The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1998/09/02 - Agenda PacketCITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGULAR MEETINGS 1 st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:00 p.m. September 2, 1998 Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 City Councilmembers William J. Alexander, Mayor Diane Williams, Mayor Pro Tem Paul Biane, Councilmember James V. Curatalo, Councilmember Bob Dutton, Councilmember Jack Lam, City Manager James L. Markman, City Attorney Debra J. Adams, City Clerk City Office: 477 -2700 City Council Agenda September 2, 1998 All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, one week prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such items. A. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call: Alexander Biane Curatalo , Dutton and Williams B. ANNOUNCEMENTS /PRESENTATIONS C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. D. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non - controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember or member of the audience for discussion. Approval of Minutes: June 11, 1998 June 18, 1998 August 5, 1998 2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 8/12/98 and 8/19/98 and I 1 Payroll ending 8/6/98 for the total amount of $1,596,181.09. 1 3. Approval of Parcel Map No. 15083, located on the south side of 10 Jersey Boulevard, east of White Oak Avenue, submitted by Karubian. RESOLUTION NO. 98 -149 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 15083 12 4. Approval of Resolution granting a Taxi Cab Service Permit to Bell I 13 Cab Company (San Gabriel Transit/ City Council Agenda September 2, 1998 RESOLUTION NO. 98 -150 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A TAXICAB SERVICE PERMIT 5. Approval of the Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Rochester Avenue, Church Street, Terra Vista Parkway East Street Improvements related to Tentative Tract 15072, generally located at the southwest corner of Rochester Avenue and Base Line Road, submitted by Lewis Homes Enterprises, Inc. RESOLUTION NO. 98 -151 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTAND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR ROCHESTER AVENUE, CHURCH STREET, TERRA VISTA PARKWAY EAST STREET IMPROVEMENTS, RELATED TO TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 15072 2 14 16 18 6. Approval to transfer Lot "A" of Tract Nos. 13425 and 12046 to the 19 State of California (CALTRANS) for the construction of SR 30 Freeway. RESOLUTION NO. 98 -152 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND SIGNING OF DOCUMENTS FOR THE TRANSFER OF PROPERTIES TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA (CALTRANS) FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF SR 30 FREEWAY 7. Approval of the Environmental Initial Study Parts I and II for the proposed Foothill- Hermosa Storm Drain Installation and Traffic Signals Modifications and Issuance of a Statutory Exemption therefore. 22 23 City Council Agenda September 2, 1998 RESOLUTION NO. 98 -153 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY PARTS I AND II AND ISSUANCE OF A STATUTORY EXEMPTION FOR THE PROPOSED FOOTHILL - HERMOSA STORM DRAIN INSTALLATION AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATIONS 8. Approval to award and authorize the execution of the Professional Services Agreement (C098 -050) with Bucknam & Associates, Inc., to provide professional services for analysis of maintenance services processes, in the amount of $27,170 ($24,000 + 10% contingency) to be funded from Fund 01- 4647 -6028. 9. Approval of a Professional Services Agreement (C098 -051) with L.D. King, Inc., to provide Topographical Design Survey for proposed street improvements for nine different locations throughout the City, to be funded from the following account nos: 10- 4637 -9805 - Summit ($2,079),10-4637-9803 - 4" St. ($4,893), 10- 4637 -9518 - Beryl ($4,257), 10- 4637 -9807- Arrow ($3,531), 10- 4637 -9808 - Haven - Lemon to Wilson - ($4,257), 10 -4637- 9809 - Church ($4,257), 10- 4637 -9810 - Hellman ($1,067), 10- 4637 -9812 - Amethyst ($8,833), 32- 4637 -9703 - Haven w/s Base Line to 19`h ($4,983). 3 25 50 51 10. Approval of the Collection Center Household Hazardous Waste 53 Agreement (CO98 -052) with the County of San Bernardino Service Area 70 Consolidated Fire District (CSA 70 CFD). 11. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Parcel Map 55 15012, located on the north side of Fourth Street, between Buffalo Avenue and 1 -15, submitted by Oltmans Investment Company. RESOLUTION NO. 98 -154 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR PARCEL MAP 15012 57 /�'►�,! City Council Agenda September 2, 1998 4 12. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13835, 58 located on the northeast corner of Highland and Rochester, submitted by Sheffield Homes, L.L.C. RESOLUTION NO. 98 -155 1 60 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR TRACT 13835 13. Approval to accept Improvements, Release the Faithful 61 Performance Bond, Accept a Maintenance Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for Improvements for DR 95 -02, located on the south side of Jersey Boulevard, east of White Oak Avenue. Release: Faithful Performance Bond $154,400.00 #3SM91192600 Accept: Maintenance Bond $ 15,440.00 3SM91192600 RESOLUTION NO. 98 -156 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 95 -02, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK E. CONSENT ORDINANCES The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non- controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion. No Items Submitted. F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. 63 If 71 City Council Agenda September 2, 1998 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTAND AMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT 15727 - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES - An amendment to Tentative Tract 15727 for the purpose of developing a gated residential community with private streets of 342 single family lots and a 5 -acre public neighborhood park on a total of 82 acres of land in the Low- Medium Residential District (4 -8 dwelling units per acre), on the north side of Fourth Street, west of Archibald Avenue and bordered by Sixth Street on the north. An Environmental Impact Report was certified for Tentative Tract 15727 and staff has concluded that no additional impacts will result from the development of the amended map and that no additional environmental review is required. A Negative Declaration for the amended tentative tract will be prepared. APN: 210- 062 -02, 11, 13, 17, 18, 19, 26, 32, and 33. RESOLUTION NO. 98 -159 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT 15727, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 342 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS AND A 5 -ACRE PUBLIC NEIGHBORHOOD PARK ON 82 ACRES OF LAND WITH GATES, PRIVATE STREETS IN THE LOW- MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (4 -8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF FOURTH STREET AND THE CUCAMONGA CREEK FLOOD CONTROL CHANNELAND BORDERED BY SIXTH STREET ON THE NORTH - APN: 210 - 062 -02, 11, 13, 17, 18, 19, 26, 32, AND 33 VACATION OF A PORTION OF SAN BERNARDINO ROAD EAST OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION FRONTING 8333 8363 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND 8351 SAN BERNARDINO ROAD RESOLUTION NO. 98 -157 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TO BE VACATED A PORTION OF SAN BERNARDINO ROAD EAST OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION FRONTING 8333, 8363 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND 8351 SAN BERNARDINO ROAD- APN'S207- 571 - 76,77,78 5 64 95 112 116 City Council Agenda September 2, 1998 DISPOSITION OF QUITCLAIM OF A PORTION OF SAN BERNARDINO ROAD EAST OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION FRONTING 8351 SAN BERNARDINO ROAD RESOLUTION NO. 98 -158 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FINDING THAT CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, TO BE SURPLUS AND A BURDEN ON THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER TO SIGN THE QUITCLAIM DEED AND TO PRESENT SAME TO THE COUNTY RECORDER TO BE FILED FOR RECORD G. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. No Items Submitted. H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP OF MARKS CABLEVISION TO AMERICAN CABLE ENTERTAINMENT (ACE) COMPANY, LLC. RESOLUTION NO. 98 -160 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE ASSIGNMENT AND FRANCHISE OF A CABLE TELEVISION FRANCHISE AGREEMENT BY DCATELEVISION (DBAMARKS CABLEVISION) TO AMERICAN CABLE ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY, LLC 6 119 124 126 127 City Council Agenda September 2, 1998 7 I. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. No Items Submitted. J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this meeting, only identified for the next meeting. K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. L. ADJOURNMENT MEETING TO ADJOURN TO EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION, FIRE /ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES WORKSHOP PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957 I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on August 27, 1998, seventy -two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. June 11, 1998 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL, REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, AND FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT MINUTES Adjourned Meeting A. CALL TO ORDER An adjourned meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council, Redevelopment Agency and Fire Protection District was held on Thursday, June 11, 1998, in the Tri Communities Room of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order by Mayor, William J. Alexander. Present were Councilmembers: Paul Biane, James Curatalo, Diane Williams, and Mayor William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager; Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Agency Director; Mitch Stagerman, Sr. RDA Analyst; Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director; Tamara Layne, Finance Officer; James C. Frost, City Treasurer; Robert Bowery, Information Systems Manager; Rose Colum, Budget Analyst; Alex Ahumada, Admin Services Officer /Fire; Stacey Robinson, Accountant; Ingrid Blair, GIS /Special Districts Supervisor; Deborah Clark, Library Director; Paula Pachon, Management Analyst II; Rick Gomez, Community Development Director; Brad Buller, City Planner; Bill Makshanoff, Building Official; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer; Dave Moore, Recreation Superintendent; Chief Dennis Michael, Fire Protection District; Michelle Bancroft, Management Analyst II; Ralph Crane, Fire Battalion Chief, Captain Rod Hoops, Police Department; Lieutenant Joe Henry, Police Department; Duane Baker, Assistant to the City manager; Diane O'Neal, Assistant to the City Manager; Jenny Haruyama, Management Analyst I; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. B. ITEM OF DISCUSSION B1. DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED BUDGETS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1998/99 Jack Lam, City Manager, presented the proposed budgets for fiscal year 1998/99. He also added they had before them a copy of the summary budget as well. He stated he would be giving a power point presentation for the first time as part of his presentation. City Council /Redevelopment Agency /Fire Protection District Minutes June 11, 1998 Page 2 Councilmember Biane asked Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, when the west end of the City along Foothill will be improved. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated this is a very extensive area to improve from Vineyard to Grove, and felt it would cost about $1,000,000 to $1,500,000. He felt they needed to complete a conceptual plan to bring back to the Council, and added this is a priority of the City. Councilmember Curatalo felt the City was being managed very well. He commended Jack Lam, City Manager, and his staff for keeping the City in the black. Doug Lyon, resident of the City had several capital improvement and traffic flow related questions that he inquired about. Staff proceeded with answers to Mr. Lyon's questions. Jim Frost, City Treasurer, stated the City had previously discussed about redoing the General Plan. He felt this should still be looked at and felt it could be done through reserves. C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC Doug Lyon, resident of the City had several capital improvement and traffic flow related questions that he inquired about. Staff proceeded with answers to Mr. Lyon's questions. Jim Frost, City Treasurer, stated the City had previously discussed about redoing the General Plan. He felt this should still be looked at and felt it could be done through reserves. City Council /Redevelopment Agency /Fire Protection District Minutes June 11, 1998 Page 3 D. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Biane to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously 4 -0. The meeting adjourned at 6:27 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: * June 18, 1998 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL, REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, AND FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT MINUTES Adjourned Meeting A. CALL TO ORDER An adjourned meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council, Redevelopment Agency and Fire Protection District was held on Thursday, June 18, 1998, in the Tri Communities Room of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order by Mayor, William J. Alexander. Present were Councilmembers: Paul Biane, James Curatalo, Diane Williams, and Mayor William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager; Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Agency Director; Mitch Stagerman, Sr. RDA Analyst; Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director; Tamara Layne, Finance Officer; Rose Colum, Budget Analyst; Alex Ahumada, Admin Services Officer /Fire; Stacey Robinson, Accountant; Ingrid Blair, GIS /Special Districts Supervisor; Deborah Clark, Library Director; Paula Pachon, Management Analyst II; Rick Gomez, Community Development Director; Brad Buller, City Planner; Bill Makshanoff, Building Official; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer; Dave Moore, Recreation Superintendent; Chief Dennis Michael, Fire Protection District; Captain Rod Hoops, Police Department; Duane Baker, Assistant to the City manager; Diane O'Neal, Assistant to the City Manager; Jenny Haruyama, Management Analyst I; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. B. ITEM OF DISCUSSION B1. DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED BUDGETS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1998/99 Jack Lam, City Manager, presented the proposed budgets for fiscal year 1998/99. He stated there were a couple of items for the City Council to discuss from comments at the last meeting. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated they have distributed to the Council maps outlining the capital projects. He continued to explain each project. City Council /Redevelopment Agency /Fire Protection District Minutes June 18, 1998 Page 2 Councilmember Biane inquired if the beautification project Mr. O'Neil talked about at the last meeting was still on line. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated yes they would be done next fiscal year. Councilmember Curatalo asked if there was something that could be done to the median on Haven Avenue between 19' and Highland. Mayor Alexander explained that this area will be affected by the Route 30 freeway and that it might not be prudent to spend money for nothing. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated he would look at that and see what can be done. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated because of the construction schedule it should be taken care of within a year. Mr. Lam also noted that the budget does have $500,000 for redoing the General Plan. He added Rick Gomez, Community Development Director, and Brad Buller, City Planner, will present information on how this process will be done. Rick Gomez, Community Development Director, referred to the memorandum that the Council had received explaining this process. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated this can be left in the budget and not spent until the Council was ready to do this. He also mentioned the vehicle license fee issue and explained the status of that. Mayor Alexander stated he is happy how the League has handled some of these issues this year. C. COMMUNICATION FROM THE PUBLIC No communication was made from the public. City Council /Redevelopment Agency /Fire Protection District Minutes June 18, 1998 Page 3 D. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Curatalo to adjourn to June 25, 1998, 5:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center, Rancho Cucamonga, to adopt the City, Redevelopment Agency and Fire Protection District budgets.. Motion carried unanimously 4 -0. The meeting adjourned at 5:53 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: * August 5, 1998 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Regular Meeting A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, August 5, 1998, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 7:14 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander. Present were Councilmembers: Paul Biane, James Curatalo, Bob Dutton, Diane Williams, and Mayor William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager; Linda Daniels, RDA Director; Cathy Wahlstrom, RDA Analyst; Rick Gomez, Redevelopment Director; Dan Coleman, Principal Planner; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer; Bill Makshanoff, Building Official; Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director; Tamara Layne, Finance Officer; Dave Moore, Recreation Superintendent; Deborah Clark, Library Director; Diane O'Neal, Assistant to the City Manager; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Captain Rodney Hoops, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; and Debra J. Adams, Assistant Secretary. B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS B1. Presentation of a Certificate of Recognition to Shayne Hardy of Alta Loma Elementary School for perfect attendance. Mayor Alexander presented the certificate to Shayne Hardy. B2. Presentation of a Proclamation to William C. Schweinfurth for Alta Laguna Mobile Home Park's National Manufacturing Housing Award. Mayor Alexander presented the proclamation to Bill Schweinfurth and several mobile home residents. B3. Presentation of Certificates to Corporate Sponsors for the 1998 Library Telethon. Mayor Alexander and Deborah Clark, Library Director, presented the certificates to the sponsors for the 1998 telethon. Mayor Alexander also recognized John Mannerino and Dusty Taylor for hosting the telethon. City Council Minutes August 5, 1998 Page 2 C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC C1. Rex Gutierrez, 11021 Carlow Court, brought pictures showing the idea he previously presented to the Council for the memorial street name signs. He also reported there was a resident on Turquoise who had informed him they were having a problem with getting their mailbox bashed in and asked for the police to check into this. He also stated there is a resident on Jennet who advised him she needs her tree trimmed. D. CONSENT CALENDAR D1. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 7/8/98 (97/98),7/8/98 (98/99),7/15/98 (97/98),7/15/98 (98/99), 7/22/98 (97/98), and 7/22/98 (98/99), and Payroll ending 7/9/98 and 7/23/98, for the total amount of $6,654,268.83. D2. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of June 30, 1998. D3. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the City Hall weather protection canopy addition project. D4. Approval of a stop sign at Camino Predera. D5. Approval to order the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 for DR 97 -35, located along Center Avenue, 24th Street and 25th Street, east of Hermosa Avenue, submitted by Northtown Housing Development Corporation. RESOLUTION NO. 98 -135 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR DR97 -35 (APNS: 209- 01 -04; 209 - 101 -05, 209 - 102 -08, 209 - 102 -15, 209 - 102 -38, 209 - 102 -39, 209 - 103 -24 THROUGH 26, 209 - 103 -29, 209 - 104 -24, 209 - 122 -15 AND 209 - 123 -09) D6. Approval of extension of Comcast Cable T.V. Franchise. RESOLUTION NO. 91 -012EE A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, EXTENDING COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO FRANCHISE LICENSE WITH COMCAST CABLE T.V. FOR 90 DAYS UPON EXPIRATION OF CURRENT LICENSE WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA D7. Approval to vacate a portion of San Bernardino Road south of the Foothill Boulevard - APN's: 207- 571 -76, 77, 78 City Council Minutes August 5, 1998 Page 3 RESOLUTION NO. 98 -136 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE A PORTION OF SAN BERNARDINO ROAD EAST OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION FRONTING 8333, 8363 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND 8351 SAN BERNARDINO ROAD - APN'S 207 - 571 -76, 77, 78 D8. Approval of the disposition of City -owned property (a 14 -foot strip of San Bernardino Road ) fronting 8351 San Bernardino Road - Chavin Development - APN: 207 - 571 -76. RESOLUTION NO. 98 -137 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO QUITCLAIM A PORTION OF A 14 -FOOT STRIP OF SAN BERNARDINO ROAD EAST OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD INTERSECTION 8351 SAN BERNARDINO ROAD - APN 207-571 - 76S D9. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for Parcel Map 15155, located at the northwest corner of Jersey Boulevard and White Oak Avenue, submitted by Master Development Corporation. RESOLUTION NO. 98 -138 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NO. 15155, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY RESOLUTION NO. 98 -139 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR PARCEL MAP NO. 15155 D10. Approval to award and authorization for execution of contract (CO98 -043) to Laird Construction Company, Incorporated, for the Haven Avenue Rehabilitation Project, east side from Foothill Boulevard to Base Line Road (Account No. 32- 4637 -9840 in the amount of $235,812.60 - $214,375.10 plus 10% contingency) and west side from Foothill Boulevard to Deer Creek Channel (Account No. 32- 4637 -9839 in the amount of $91,704.90 - $83,368,10 plus 10% contingency). D11. Approval to accept the Ballfield Lighting Project at Etiwanda Creek Park, Contract No. 98 -026, as complete, Release the Bonds and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion, approve the final contract amount of $160,640.00 and appropriate $15,582.00 from the account balance of Fund 20 to be placed in Account 20- 4532 -9721. City Council Minutes August 5, 1998 Page 4 RESOLUTION NO. 98 -140 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR BALLFIELD LIGHTING PROJECT AT ETIWANDA CREEK PARK, CONTRACT NO. 98 -026 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK MOTION: Moved by Curatalo, seconded by Williams to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports contained in the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously, 5 -0. No Items Submitted. E. CONSENT ORDINANCES F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS F1. CONSIDERATION OF PUBLIC NEED AND NECESSITY IN GRANTING A TAXI CAB SERVICE PERMIT TO BELL CAB COMPANY (SAN GABRIEL TRANSIT) (To be continued to August 19, 1998) MOTION: Moved by Curatalo, seconded by Williams to continue the item to August 19, 1998, 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. Motion carried unanimously. 5 -0. F2. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION ORDERING TO BE VACATED FOUR PORTIONS OF ALLEYS GENERALLY WITHIN THE NORTHTOWN AREA BOUNDED BY HERMOSAAVENUE - MARINE AVENUE AND 26T" STREET - HUMBOLT AVENUE (V -155) Staff report presented by Joe O'Neil, City Engineer. Councilmembers Biane asked if there were other alleys in the area that are a nuisance. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated no one has come forward with a request for vacation for any of the other alleys. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council was: Nacho Gracia, 10364 Humboldt and the Northtown Housing Development, stated there are other vacations they will be requesting. He added they would like to close as many as possible. There being no further comment, public hearing was closed. City Council Minutes August 5, 1998 Page 5 RESOLUTION NO. 98 -141 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TO BE VACATED THOSE PORTIONS OF CITY STREETS (ALLEYS) GENERALLY WITHIN THE NORTHTOWN AREA BOUNDED BY HERMOSA AVENUE - MARINE AVENUE AND 26TH STREET - HUMBOLT AVENUE MOTION: Moved by Dutton, seconded by Williams to approve Resolution No. 98 -141. Motion carried unanimously, 5 -0. F3. CONSIDERATION TO AMEND TERRA VISTA PARK DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 1 LEWIS HOMES DEVELOPMENT COMPANY - a request to amend provisions for park credit for private open space in the Terra Vista Planned Community. Staff report by Dan Coleman, Principal Planner. Councilmember Dutton inquired if this was a housekeeping item. Dan Coleman, Principal Planner, stated yes. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 591. ORDINANCE NO. 591 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO TERRA VISTA PARK DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 1, AS SUPPLEMENTED MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Curatalo to waive full reading and set second reading of Ordinance No. 591 for August 19, 1998. Motion carried unanimously, 5 -0. No Items Submitted. G. PUBLIC HEARINGS H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS CONSIDERATION NGA CAL FORN A AMENDINIG CHAPTOER 3.48 OF HE RANCHO O HO C CAMONGA CU CAM• MUNIC PALL CUCAMONGA, CODE PERTAINING TO UTILITY USER'S FEES City Council Minutes August 5, 1998 Page 6 Staff report by Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public input. There being no response, public comments were closed. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 5588. ORDINANCE NO. 558B (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 3.48 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO UTILITY USER FEES MOTION: Moved by Curatalo, seconded by Biane to waive full reading and set second reading of Ordinance No. 558B for the August 19, 1998 meeting. Motion carried unanimously, 5 -0. I. COUNCIL BUSINESS 11. DISCUSSION OF FILLING CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEES SUBCOMMITTEES AND COMMISSIONS Staff report presented by Diane O'Neal, Assistant to the City Manager. A list of the approved subcommittees is on file in the City Clerk's office. Diane O'Neal, Assistant to the City Manager, stated there has been one resignation on the Planning Commission and that is Bill Bethel. She stated Dave Barker has verbally resigned but that the City had no written resignation from him. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated the City will post a "10 day" notice announcing the vacancy. Mayor Alexander suggested the Council review the list of applicants in order to fill the vacancy. The Council concurred. 12. AFTER - SCHOOL PROGRAMS OFFERED BY VARIOUS AGENCIES Staff report presented by Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager, and Dave Moore, Recreation Superintendent. They introduced Dianna Lee Mitchell with the YMCA for presentation of information also. Councilmember Dutton stated he would like to encourage joint cooperation between all agencies for programs within the community. ACTION: Report received and filed. 13. DISCUSSION ON POLICY FOR REMOVAL OF POLITICAL SIGNS FOLLOWING AN ELECTION - (Oral Presentation) City Council Minutes August 5, 1998 Page 7 James Markman, City Attorney stated he understands the Council was interested in a policy for removing political signs. He stated previously a City could require a $25 to $50 deposit to make sure the signs were removed. He stated the question is what amount would be good in a City like Rancho Cucamonga which would include not only City elections, but also state level issues. He stated he felt the ACLU might fight this if a fee were charged. He stated if the City is going to do this it needs to be enforced. He added he felt it would work for City Council campaigns, but that it would be difficult for state level issues. Mayor Alexander suggested that there be an agreement for a candidate to sign when they run for election that they will remove their signs 10 days after the election. Councilmember Williams brought up what do you do about the state level issues where they don't go through the City Clerk's office. Jim Frost, City Treasurer, felt the City should keep the existing policy in force, but that staff should go through and be able to remove any signs still up after 10 days. Jim Markman, City Attorney, stated he felt Jim Frost's idea would work. Gary Bemis felt the newspaper could publish a list of names of those that don't take down their signs which would hopefully encourage them to get them down. Councilmember Dutton felt a letter should be sent to the candidate to him know his signs need to be removed from the June election and also advise him where they are located. Bill Makshanoff, Building Official, stated he is already in the process of doing this for the City Council candidates from the June election, but that it would be useless to do this for the state or county races. Councilmember Curatalo felt if staff sees a sign in the public right of way, they should take it down instead of going back to the office and writing a letter. Mayor Alexander asked about the Billboard situation on Foothill. Bill Makshanoff, Building Official, stated SANBAG advised him it will be down by August 15. The Council thanked Mr. Makshanoff for this. J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING No items were identified for the next meeting. K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC No communications were made from the public. City Council Minutes August 5, 1998 Page 8 L. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Biane to adjourn to executive session to discuss: A) Potential Litigation -one case -per Government Code Section 54956.9; and B) Property Negotiations per Government Code Section 54956.8 for property located at Rochester, between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Route; Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager, negotiating party, regarding terms of agreement; and C) Pending Litigation per Government Code Section 54956.9 of Archambo vs City of Rancho Cucamonga. Motion carried unanimously, 5 -0. The meeting adjourned at 8:39 p.m. No action was taken in executive session. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CIVIC City Clerk Approved: ** W I O 1 Q 1 CL 1 m 1 0 1 � 1 CJ 1 � 1 0 1 W I < 1 1 z I � I o� co Ir W ;r 0• < Z r! .,�d sm =<o = 3 Z r ❑ < c 0 r S J. w > m - O J £ ! Q m I 31 0 z m m Q 3 z .0.. F- U Ln uj G iE I I~. u W n E II 4 II 2 I II N Q n C n � n .! I 0 0 - ac�o- 00000col^InnrJONOCJmnaoo ac 0 In 0. - 0r.OoNmmnoN- +mnONONNm •a0m'o0Q 0 0 0• a 'o n4'-d o inln- +,0-jonm-0n'dinUCN- +mo-oIn0,q -n a N a m (vIco onNPncnmmmoNC�aa- �a-+Oa n m D. m n 0 It a -+ In In a -+ N N Ci N o- o o m o N o o o o n o m NOP 000, 000,000 -+Oa Umin 00 n666ri6660N OI�C7NI -I �am0- �V�Nh[7N fn M a -� n N A n CL J 0mP C N 0 N m -T n -a w 01 O Nrla In Onmo o-nt'7a1n D r- M 01 o nC (a, a, OnmO O�•+0000 sr-- 00gc ta.o 0 0 0 0� c a onnnnnnnnnnmmmmmmmmmmo ao -0.0.0 -0 - 400NN0000 wnooaaa, o�a. o. o�o- a, a�o�a. o�o��o. a. o�o�o�o�o�a�o�o�o• a- o�o ,o�a.o�,o.o- a��o- 0,o�a�nnhnhh > o• eocc00000000000000000000c0000000000000000000000000 Y w S O m 0 a c o 0 Ln w In w W a ui w •, V x J J W S N J IL W d CL .. 0- G G❑ m ❑❑ V ❑� 0-O N CA O Z O W LO 1- O - m O CL m N In I L: W W w W I+_ :._ (n In W W Q w Z m In W d W to .w .V 'MU Vm ZmmW UAW+ WU U Wm £w - Dm in UZW in J z J > ❑ > ❑ < - Z J ❑ J > ❑ > ❑ U' m ❑ W J ❑ ❑ J - ❑ Z Q J Z N ILd c¢ z W Z Z W WJQILZILMZSZNZ W InZInCLZ ZamWJzQZd W O aZ I:wIT.OW MOM W WT, LZaOaW D WDLU LnLr W 0M ILO OIL0w<nzWIL OW D h-w IIIZ W W F- ZZL WOI+ -OI LW WLW -F- mZ L. O OL. I. OF•ZI -l., W F-O LnF -W:., ww1�ww zwI :) Enwch W W -jww W W"•U:W W W WI- ZM 1 Ui CL Z z JYmZUm V UUIz m JmJmIL WZU amE m Z m ❑UWmZ - Z S W W .. 'W: Q U O- > Q.-�- - W wQ Q IL E.... a - W O W D - Cr -Q W Z 7 £ U Q >" Z- Z '-+ J Z S£ J J Z 4 V z U Z z Z Z D N J Z Wu Z- Z U Q J Z Q£ U Ln > z£mzoF -OF- Cw o£zozoeOOmmo moszoF -oz F- o£ z F- d < W <- Q N- M W In M- < -- < - -.r r. W =M - < - < - d Zw0 ZT wF-J w Mm N� >zF- zmF- mF - >:17 i x >F- W ZI - sF- Z In IL F-W W Z < > m WJ :-+UZQ W <C9Q W W QJtLQwL�<NQm�❑ W mQC9 W4F-<W JLLi£QJ�- W w s < w F-UE� W+'-' W < ZwZ3zZwmF -WrW W W W Q Z Z Q W<f -WmwW <ZaW U DF- S W s IT; Z'-"mZ 'mF- ^�m.,F- .-��-+"rZmZ 'S' mm'-' mmWZS�•,mZF-- -m-r-Z U Ln m < x+24^- �OrvU'L*1 3LLIfSLOUZ�-' V'-+ V GvCiml.In ❑UJ'-+U3Q-ZmD(Jm£- W1 W W QWJ<m'-+W ZOwCOOJ:CQWQrIJm W-'CnWO ^+W'-•'<W:LWdWOCW WOQ r v > m F- Z J C W N ~ Z m W �-+ N _ c V. U7 d V ❑ z il: W U 3 `% ❑ O 2 U z W ❑ Z m Ul J VIn U OW ^ <., J m W Q W W Um >Lr < 4 N V t-• 4 m W IT S U'• N M Jam+ > U)V wCN T W m d> QU Z U'.zF- J w < Q ZzG > m HC W. Om QZ G O T Um Z Z U' 00 J F- J Z W �:.. ^�< > W -S J ZIT z W O HJE -Z0 d W W wIn -... F-J MLgE G3 < <Q ^ < F- m rJi Q < U< W U _ > (T J ^ a r W J W 7 O J _ W U; > £ C- J< Z cr m �- L: W D u , c F- < W W N W M Z In W J J C F- r- O- <- "' ❑ '" r'' �- ^ W L'' W W H C Z In Q S Z W H< W M Z^ ZI- "3- � >L Z ~m^•O ^' L:�••-'aLi7W+C >NUY --' ^ZULU -Y❑❑ O F- W S V> 2 O£ O J m Z F- C m W J< czcx `. U< F- - '-+ J m U Z W C z >E Q V E -EF C]c wr3 ❑ G <F mO OI <V £ <J- Ox <<D<- S Y z m 5 2m� E 2L ^.^ - I-G JJ r m z aO£ - M U .W� Ecr JQ Z < w 1 F- O u Z "v '' J W 2 ui < Z £ Z F- m❑ Z Z < a0.^ > r z _E'W V <,. <W z -0 z0 � £O J> w C :n m EC Z E Z L v. -m <^ Z�.: -W Z > Z m- Z >2m > <u,Ns >z� J W pW� - F-- s� - ^'-rr YCJ £ < -W0am0 dy<JUWwwL, W m0 0 C- <m 6L z 4 Q J0 F-'w O 0YY W V 0 u0<W zF- W »QF- CL 0 W < s N V < ❑v <r¢wJCww»rN.'. mU7J0CMU0a. 3 W ozMJEmmZ<<1 -WJEZ E E = U V V J F E E C O s Q Q W C D O O O m m» Q<<< W S S- J 0 0 0 Ln V C O m <E < <<<< <<<d < <<mmG=Am = GmmUV Q V u V Uvuv O R if) ur) M ",aannmC-- .0Zr,r`I`rJNM I)M'rMMnC" op, MM 7,0 -+0,M D,0 O IL r, c t\ 0 N �+ 7 C- "J O N a M -- r m O rJ Id a N O rd n -0 N -^ -0 N a M N -O rd 'D L rJ rd h a 1) m C a O N- C mNMm0• t m(ZPr^+m mnmmminti C'Im0' ^mmm m ma•0-0 O C a N N ,ui Oa0 Ina 00rNa0 O 0 q m aOlna0 O O ON N N N r4 ru ro N N ti N N N N N I NI W I C9 I Q I 0_ I P P m P z m r UiP C � I N < C = 3 - W Cl < G o F- tr W �- a > J Er O W F- I EI ¢I I ¢ I 31 ZI I ¢I Q I <I 31 of I 1- I .a. I I sl NI W I � I I E I W i W �E Q Z I¢ 0 I O Z W m 0 0 0 ocn oc�nr.conon�co -•o oa�omom a m000 NfJNN 0Om00('10f' NOONO^1nL�C a O di [) NO.0.0 Lna aN-t 60 Lt100LnPOPnN- -r c a m no rdgr -" -" 7t MVM-am,O- +O('S0-MNN 0N -AO 0 P IT - M O r"OONN -" MOO-N m - "N m N N000raom0000aon0mo^LInO -»0.00 O C m m a P 0 P 0.O 0 0 0 0, NC o nnOmL%O,Ordm ra1.7Lr:O,OPnmL, O-" l7 NaaP - "O E� C� r7 r, ¢ JOnmO- �fdt�aln�cN0O.O-NM-t0,OnmPO NM a n cr, m0, 0-+N m O'oNmPO - "m'T O'orn m0000- "-"-"- - - -+ - -f1tNNNfJNNNNNC7f7r�f)( -J 11f'�t'TP1 (iaa a a a a a a7 a VZ f �l nNtntfsu wnnnnnnnnnrnrn nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnl�nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn !� > 0000000000000000000000000c000000000c0000co000000000 ol�cnc��, c�l�I�c�c�c�c�l�r �c�I�rlr�rlc�cic�l- Lt7 clrll�c�lnc�c�I�rlrol�rl��, L^ L 'll�I'J:7L`7I70rIl^.['ll"]f7l'� x Y V x # I x x x x 2 # Z x 1# # ## # # ## # W m O n L) n # O O # f U; -. m W W J CL v c� r- t,, z D c D O O In In U) Z Ln z J z w 0 LO O F- 11 O .J+ O w W Ln V z Z W W z w Z W Cn Ln W U m LL In V Ln W Ln -" N O u In w w wuow w A w z wwM z Mw >w mcr JV F- > O-" z c W >F- O J J LLI0 Z ZJJJ z >JwJ ¢< - "z aw s zJ w < z mw<wzaa. zwLU w CaaL Wa satnr. O. d A Q -" u to W M DCL Ln In z En 0 LL W J Ln 0 0_ 0. 0 u LO !- -+ M M (L F 0_ Ln w a a Z W Z Cr W 0_ w W WL- OLn J ZL, 00 m -"z z 1-00 ZOWODZ0 w W s w u < -" -" W D W F- F- -" W �jl G ¢ w W Ln N a. > W -" < 0 M L; -" Ln LL: Ln 0 m mm LLJF W mAJ JxLnLL, V zZJ =YEzI - u¢ W Cu < > < W J -" t-F- �- Z0A0a. « UL-"W-"a 3-Om -" ww J W-" E C W W w E W <WF- Ww z a ¢DwEza- zuzwJE<az 0 w- "zJzuu WInJz zLL V •uz udzQ<Q0z F-OZZ 3<mL ^ZOC O-"Q� WE OO¢ --- OZZ F- CF- cmZZZOwZ- OZ�ZZO Z•• •• E - 0-�M Z > M Ln In-+ < In- << Cam - z w<< < a Q S - <a << - LU > F > (n F Oc LnCW F > W j M -Z Z >zM- W F Czzz <zT"IzOZzF- E¢Lnm JF m j m w < m < w w J w <C Z w < w w J-" W <E< W W W <U W Cln W a W W< aW W W mW Q <V w wF- UZAUUW<<<wz wF-- mZZW r_Lij F- F- LLn F- LL. LIJ M F-W - +A- -4 F-W <cr - +L--- su'-- E- +�sswI s z z i- s- a W Z Z Z a �' Z Z Z Z a DU» Z¢F -AZi^ W UWL W M 1L-UM 0Cr UlU - . -+ ZQUI UD'F-- +- .--..; Z ^iG- •< --U OWOO OF ¢-"W x WJ<W OwW W W - Z<OW << 0M DLL CWC<Q< << LS<CQ<W wLZEE Em 0 C.,c m wV0 =m >CCJE- aa==E E EF- m=WCSEEF JEE .EF EE s 0 U C W r Z Z u V m U W C -z-. Z O -z- •- F- 0_ V F Z u n O W ¢ w z F- Z In W m W W F s a Z _ 0 J Ln Z < G L- N ¢ m D L; z N W w -" Q L: D N c 0 W O O J O -� F- O w x £u Ln Ln x N O WO:a V C U W -� U -C V -�39 V d OW W W O - W m N<IT Z -+ O r O F- <EZ -+ J M Cr F- V Z W U -+ 1 C L < s O V O < Q F- O 00 Q N - Z Z5Q0 s E-- L m w Uw 0 UmLr -i 0zI-F- 3w C <Q -a. -^ - w -Z.W < J 3 <U:ir W C - C- w > U U F- O F- 3 = M c w m= < c Z' 3 C ^ W Z F- W Y ui L Z L^. W O er Z C - -" Ow J w E YJU-"c Z C Ll ZC,' U D <LV Nw< Lnm as u¢ L ¢ .ZCOLn<<F C.,- "C >ZLLL C <3 C- M> C zZ;c E - z:n CF- u F-U (LxuZuZ aOU <-"<_ Ou Y O> I C C ZC I- E LC -D OQZz <ZI- ZZ i ! <-"< -" WCCC W> "[L W CZ <E O< F-Y 00 u0-j W- "£mUZ7C 1F- J Zr Ll •C.. - W <CJ >< z Lf, CC C Z < 0:¢ O <Z -C -E0< ZUC< - z w U < V 7Z<OL: < EF-0c0 Li CE LL EY >0<0 2 r-Ul <J F-OM ^F- < W J Z _:n Z V- F-E F- F- Q U?OY L--JF- Z C "O<< O ZQ-' -" U.BF -3JE <WAWJa D >CC -+JC<C JZ< + W Wxu0u JJUi ZZZZ < VUVU VC]C]C]t]OCCO'wwW W Wt- k:�:9C9 C: U' L9 U' CA 3J C�C:C9mm2m2m m =2�- "- + ^-"77 Lf�0, -" -O0 �OaP01 Nm00•S0:- "N0-O0 :�i('la0 n n 1�Ln -�NLf' - Lf` c :* U�!�r.0 •tram -" 0 O a O 0 m O P N�o_n M O O N 0 ,0 r m ^ a d' m r) -" -" 0 C. M -" M •O M^ v` m P W mm rJ ram m n m a a N O a P O a IT 0 O n za It m -^ aamamm - U ^a m Pnn u x000 N- •c'o0l^.-t•Oa M nI, Z-Z L'7 -O-LO Ga N--C ) --aln0 LTi W 1 G" I C ta. E ¢ s 3 2 a ¢ 3 z L O I, - r Y iJ Liu C G] • E i I• I ! t I + I I t E 1 Z t t 1 C ' 1 '] I a r 1 Z ' m 0 0 0 V, Inmn0c gn00000OnP O"mm00I1 N 0 0 0 0 4 0 n00- Um0Nmmo0h0000In0mrl m Pd•n00mlf 000nm0 - .InnO- Nnv �cMa -n00u +0m- +OPnnOnn.0- +DOP -+0 NNN- r, -+0Pti V' -+NP -r NMI TN(^.(` M00' -�C,00 r) rd tD0 - -N � POn NN nmOINN - 00PM r M0r-MD,0M0 --n a0lnv nnommaomomo% P 0- 6 .o m- + zN%n m� t6 0 P �NM 00--0 �m -+7fJa ri ai -• m ,� r1 r1 CL 1 1 Q JmPO-- NC371n- OnmPO OnmPO -+N['1 QIn.OnmPO -N('l V 0.OnmP0 N(')�T In'Onm m 0 n p.p.p.4.04 C.C4-nt -Nnn nnnnnnmmmmmmmmmmPPPPPP 0, PPP000000000 wnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnrnnnnnnnrlNNNrnnrnnnnnr nnnrnnnnnnmmmmmmmmm > 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 -- - - - �rrc'! c�- t�; �r�c�r�c�t�c�t�r3r�t�t� t7t�t�tht�t�-- -- ---- ^I H N N -y -1 -- rl -- -- rl -" rl H ti H .-e --1 ti ^F -- -- H N ti rl rl -•1 .� - H --1 --1 ti r1 rl N rl ri rl rl -- rl -1 rr -- H ti rl rl x� Y W 2 V P P m U) N W W W Ln W `./ H J J u) d a a LO zz i o > CL CL U] .u+ F F- Lr N U) D C7 N V N U) U) U7 (n U) W W L ^. > W LL.- U7 w tii lil L7 W W L'i W Z W W w LL: w W U -+ W C w w Lii --+ Ln -- V U -- C -'r -- -- V U V z J W £ E J W J J C J Z z J Q J J J z z z < W W U) S W J U) W J S u a s D a m < « m (L a. a < << z N U) w G U; a En a CL a a w a W Z Z IL U) C_ 2. r- Z Z Z W Z Z - LF)DZa. Z ZFF r- D > DD U)D -" W WD W< DDD W W W F- LU F- Ui J w U; LL: D D w E E D Lr C N Ln r W N J I- 1- U) -" '-� In U) U) z uzu a-- uLr) u30 :n c: w z a z z Ju z z - w-" 0. JW-- - -"EE - -wLoCD ww w wa - w am www -- - --. Q z J E J z a u_ Z a z J z z z z u) u Z z z u u Z E> u D z < Z< V a< m u V u z< z<< ED W cwaaz 0--0 JJ=000> ZW ^- Oczzowmzm0 EOEz DC W Z ZZOEO£E - +U)L')U', " D <fA- +Cr-+m QQ.......... Q Z(ll- +- +QQ-+N W < �••r Q N Ul<QQr -+ t+I�U)CU)HW L�ZU: f- OH' it)"""'�I-I^1"CZO- +F-F-ZZF-CUIZ WF- LW ujz >Wzzz�- W!- W W J< W D W< J W LC < a< w u V < <<< z w I - << W W< D WO < J Q J W W W< W W W< J< J U wzmz WO= zwxwZzz w w w w <F- CLC W WI - F- WOE F -QW V W V F V u -C f- F'r W V W V U �5 --+E- M -+WZ-- xZ= -<< C ZW WCS zzxzzzmm -^C Z -L- ZZZC = -- 2 V U) - - XuMr -- W,Q <U0ZZ US-+ L� <If. -•+ V =V2S L:1 w D w D w w < < D wC w w n W uiQQW W J <h-w Ww wQ 1-T D <Q <w w W w £-- <CSEECS <EU'.0 >C> £ C =E EES >C>> x W r m > z z In V 0U)L -1 y < w Z z ., J .w w J Z E O ,FH J ,U) O Z J U 3 V U C ZO u In C7 J V W G < N- > U) w < Z :J W a< S J V C F- J C H F- U w < z > -- Z m --u 0Zwa a > w za D a M> - -z Z v- W u a z u w-• C LQ <¢ C OW In < -. U)mmL. Z -+Z<Z D <z z E V F- 3w u h U W < IL LD w00m < ---Z0Z W W In< amU - - a0 N CUs <f < - -(nJrE W ZuwCD" -•+wZ U £W zN U)a - In z ZzW Yc ZIr- JZD - U- "S C L; ZELn - x V 0 - ¢ DU) O - - m < ` <m < W mZ(nCl- J :++ m v'' w NDImw U(P. Y m <Oo umwwa u t--"Z Z <¢ < C a > -" w z I x :^ <Q u V m S n ZuwmE <uw E 3 _ a It .' G> C C m JLt) .. Z w- •-•;:; D wm L') Z- <-+ ax ^F - .+1 <JG G C -' u I` - '-' J m V m <<<- 'D m J> W C; c. w E< wW Za0"< z< --OCZE .+::: r -..tJ< :cu -j - - -£z r CJ CSZ W Q�> >m YE' - Zw wa :3 Z- Z'�ZJ --<rU W U --Cy<O •-� D wJ U< S ZO _ -+ < -.. LLi --Y <Z V ZZCL^.w - L ^w< <z I -+ w m 64 Z:z0 w <U) U D Y <>> G JOGDC Z S< ---- U)---- «:f.2::lJ- OZ W u :n0mUZm Lnwcz -"J J x Y om C' -2 - L,m YF-�CEU) W <Z--Z <U)Om -" Z -F-CL mow Wa >2d ZJJCEJ- +E3QQ<wZU; CUCma - »ZmD aJx k0Z LUUCr CL W E3 < <0 <W i ZOD << w u <<<UU "' -"--OO <LJ L- E3 < < <:. -"00 7D'�- �YYYYYYYJJJ JJJJJJ - EEEE EEEEEEEE z z z 0 000caa.L a. IL r- CL NC'7�Inu�mmomOKCJO --nn v P N mNMMI', rCM %0' n 0- m -Dmm mm"0mD-N P, C" I^ --m V 0-Tm N -a.a 4.rcn t z-C 7� !. •c Ir r a,O oNNNRC Or P,CP It rd mN N aT m m) r0m ulc V P - CmmPmm - NC.m ^Nmmmt- mcc J- v - Ot,mm 0mtc r,mn CJm P ' m u) OCJf6Ern'TM m0,0 oCMOOON -OQQ 0 0 T 00C, N ---t00 -" -O NI - )u) r4 In 7 InL') C 0-- 1n m ('1 (' C ) t7 m (' M It w 0 a a T P a Z o La F-o u Z :d V ¢ f < O S 3 Z y ❑ <OO s ¢ LO to _ -- a Ir I£ Ia I l I2 It I a 13 0 z � I D: I QI 31 Z ❑ CL ¢ V �n W ❑ £ W E a Z ¢ O ❑ z W CJ @ @nP @OOPPCOPOOOOOPD OOJOGP-- •0O^lO @O0)O V�[ ']n @Ci�OOnOOO�O- +NtI�P- �OOOOmC* 0•CJOOt'1O0N� Pn- Cl,•0OO©zoZ4Nm ComPOcn- �Infn ^JOmoo V O:no-m 0M00t -NCO V fan •OM0- 4rlO- NCvOt- I'd M01r]NrM In -+❑N❑ rd N n - ICJ d' QM•0 It O7 •0 P �aDOOVOOOa0000no ,OPOOO� nO0innOlt @C7O rio �:ooriu;oov c -oao (IiONC'IOONO�CJNCdiinm h - n rd -+ -+ -+ CJ m Cd O ❑ CL JPO -NM.t n•On @U O- +Nmgrn On @PO Nn t In 4r, in•On@ ¢O --+ --+ - +(V CJN(1iNNCdNrd(VM m MM r) r)f'7t' Inr).;t 77nr,0 n0 nV:0 •L .a CO o a •0•x•4 0 W @ @ @m @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @OJ @ @G7 W @ @ @ @OJID@ W @ @@@ @ @ @ @ @mOJ @ @(LOJ @ @tDID[D070J0J © @@ >000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 O ('] t7 ['] t7 O N t'1 ❑ t'I C) ❑ Cl C) O r7 C7 C7 [� t� ('7 ❑ M - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x i l Y i S* # W 2 V Q 4 O # ¢ W r z Ef) a V R w N iA LL) J L') O zrL0 ❑ ❑ ❑ z Q zU) £ U)DZ Z Z u - W W < J W U) D W D D u 4- I En 1, W N V L, U1 U) W U) U) J J 0. z J Z U)WU3JW W W z WU)r w N W --�-+ U) a > w W - raULLU) -+ W N V -- ¢ZM¢U) W In V) L)-- mIn w- M(,- M V < E V J- +a - - aJ ¢ ❑ ❑ J-+<❑ a a ❑ 'U) 0 U❑ ❑r D ❑❑ W W a. LL D >WZa w Z Z 0_ «ZwZ" LI) ZVU) ZaW JV W -- z w m z z U) w >4 W N¢U)D0_TLlw0D D aaJ D VDw W ND -* W Da-- - U > WDW D Dei, m Zx:)z WZWDWZZ W W W ¢ -+ =r terra L. L. U)D WwUSii)f -U)W WU)�- •�GW�-+W W r > WU)WZ W W£WA V N m V¢ J VJ¢ ¢ z¢UC --a Jswa ^s a UUzzz U)<awwIt < - E LU --W Wa - EL c W WO -- JJa a U)aJ WD W w0O W 3 U CL J--+ J ZUr oOOa¢ M <W am- +actDMW- - aaa¢ -tn -ZD in- Z-D-aa aa� cnr�..•,¢...,¢� W) -ZE W zw) -z ZU) r h w z z w r VF - ZL.> r W 0 - zr »SLY V W - +C1- F- w'-rLJ)Z W U W W J W W a W W Z W W Q U<¢ w W r< W << ¢ W< S u <W< a 1) Q< O z W r¢ u r Z W r u< z u W r W H r D W Z W rZ¢Z m0 rI- 0u-„LL <nL) v -•v¢•+ -•�E umu¢ - -: LLuJ¢ - -u - > Z_Z30ZSaN V VHS �- D¢ Q W W Q D W<' O DLL W X L'+ -- << O W D w V< `- LL W W w< LL Q< _ - W L. O D> < LL W D w w O< tea£¢ >EO¢£GE.+O¢a5i- ££O¢ ❑¢ ^£JOS L7ECEC Z r :JUr- SSr <rS >£F u £ Z Z Z Y W O C N J Z W £ ^ l w O W r Q W z > Z W J U V V Z En JW U Lr -j L) U) rH WW ¢r D a¢ w Z z w £ z J J O U) r ¢ >< C > 2 J a w< ¢ zW J Z ¢-- ❑ Z NZ J¢ ❑ ro tP. u< ^C 'J V rD w 0_ --V J D wr J ^ Oa0 Z r ¢f- „u« - - C*J ul �<LAw O U)< O ¢ - aa < C> e- ^Z as ❑c W W -- > >¢ W> U ¢ Zz a r D¢ ^^ = <W Z 3 < z r U) ¢ W W -• U' u > C L O> w a< V O V ¢< W -. E W C C W Z w J Ew>> z <Z WCLMX,W D ¢ V Z s'- ¢z Z Z PU; ^ - -a aC ❑ < m OCG -+ <Y¢ --Z¢ W J -iCD D W O ^W ^Q - ZZ¢ Z> -- C --Z O ErYJ Cat Z❑ Da W ❑F- I sI x Z<Z ,,Q£L3 - - -CE Q =IJ) wC W Z J G G I u< e? V E G e'. < <¢ W V^ S Y -" < V- ^-� a O' O<E y CS w < W --� ¢Oa Z >a(I:Dz Z Y > a C, U,> < - ❑W - -< w ^ .� :` -- T Y r L C :^. . It <J U)J V z : .^- ^V a¢ ❑J> D - W SLL Z W< W u Z V J O ^ C J V C T> 3 L.. <❑ U7 z< J J - < W -( n E - t- -- C- W W --¢¢ C <J¢ z'"O;P. CCC LL=J< W • = = S W CJ- <<< <Lr, W S W- +<<LL -1< £r L7 -G r;30Z<W J <<JZ¢LLL D0: m W V¢ ut. W O D G d d❑ z£ i❑^ »> MO > <❑ U Z Z Z< 0< W U E Z< J< W Q W C Z L¢ ^" O rrm m < 4 m W W'LL:W---- COOCr > << <<u W W I - -- - - E C C 0 Ci iaF F- � - D «SQS atLGd2¢¢¢c¢¢¢r¢¢¢s¢S¢¢ Ill U: V L7U)V wLT,mLrlTm LPL "V'L LPmL)0Tmw rrrr .at')LnM - +OO•qr 0 --r-a0 n •0 .0-0.0 NNn0- 0%'i nMD,?,- --tom -ZN ' r` m00-00n ' n z r•Oh @ Y•: P N •0 ❑ CJ @ @ •0 Z t, •0 rd cT n Z -Z r 'd O h 'd O L; 2 N N U -- N r` n .0 ( i I rl o M h @tn 0 N @01 P ^0)0, P Z PN O-Z - OPP D- n -PM n 0, Nii C)G - U ?t` - M2 TND.P MM t7 - o C) -' 0 C)OO ^O O cuTOOCO r. -•G -•N O-• Lr, 1r) a0O V OON o I'] .. .. -. .. -. .. ... -. -. '. Ll n I w I c^ 1 Q I a1 1 t mI PI 1 I 1 mi I I LLi I F- I Q I C I Z D I m I T T Z ", < O H f E 1 Q i 1 ¢ 1 Cr 3 1 z I I ¢ I ¢ I Q I 3 I Z' O!i F- a J C M W p E I < 1 Z Er 1 F 1 O 1 1 z F w 0 0 0 V 0 0 N 0,0000nCd -n00 V a v000P 0 m r nu�00Cm C- �noo�oa0n- n001 0 DP000n0 n OY%vZO Z -Z MO-0NOPO PCd - +O`W'+O000 'D ^+ n M M n m0M0 , L- 0MNn0CdM df'ICJO- +POP O -+ t' m m o n N -Cc)--f- P Cc N n -� O fd -" (7 Cl V M a Q JPO-+ Nf iad).OnmPO- +Nf'lari4nmPO- +NI']C u•11i ¢-0nnnnNNNNNNmmmmmm mmmmPPP oil OP P P wmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm >0000000000000000000000000000 Y W S V # # U) LU w LL "+ J F ¢ Cr LL W N w N O UZ UZ W it. z 3 LL: � v3 > a D z c; G Ur) OF LO w F-J¢W mN ¢ Cn LA J LZ QiaLLW W V ZJ W In W 0 0o-Q ZZ"+U1a Ln D"- WE U1 z M Z Za Z D E Q w > EOLA LA W DD D DD LL L.. a0 V V ¢ ZF-W "-C'; LL L, LO LL LLLOLL w W ¢N - W ¢¢wz - 'LL.' Ix Ili w¢ W w a = w CC^ >m0 w VW Ja`- ZS¢ < Cr m W¢ DzL; sx WF-F +Eaa C JD z Z Z¢cg <u:+ " �- OW <JaaDa* -ZZ a03 Z Z - -'Z COW «-X; CZ E3 ' -'Dma. - ^u0^ ZD CSC -+M> �> W> NON �>.•..,m., �•=" < EQS- L:i'Y ~WWL 'W W WJ CQ< �'L7Q-'<E< <Lr C<a L: QSZ V V F- Uw"I �C'-+w j CCSwD F- LL < F- f-�••�^-'" -'^"Z �¢a'z J¢a¢ >� vVavtrG r ZU=U1 Z 0 Z �� u -c sOava W W>wCEZ i", <aDOD" -LLW <DW W <LL D W w sx -LZ G.-D ^E: r EnE0 >E:,. s¢ EL "G =M=S - Z LZ Cr LL > w W V ¢ V Z V -- w " O- > U N G> ~> ¢w F- ¢¢ V r s - V J .3 C W Z E W N .- < O V C': > F- L I < L; V ^sN D Z Ll C z CECm"' WO ¢ z _W C _¢U's ZWLZ a L� < - F <L- w ¢ =Ln <LL > LC -- CiLL LL >p> V <z CCc ¢ O U7< Z < '" L V Z .: < L+ - < V .- ;�; W Z r W z z< - UZ ~ W x C w W U,L OCF -F-<Qz JW'-0- C z a Ll U a " -- - "- J C,) ¢ Y Y ¢ ma x J U) J¢ J s z C>> E ZzzzZa4<"- < < <L.:L. ~ ~> Ll'� mPLnmGmn 0 �NPOOCJV�(^d- 2 OC7m ^P c L:CM00Nmmm illm0.0mO Cu- 0C'IO0 P P 7 V% r P C. u o% ,o P rd �t N C P S Cu V) P: P m P U' OOJIct NCI V u:- -fd 0CcMLr) --C.00 a u70h0 - S P P m P C9 z E L P uZD, U � I It m D < O 2 3 Z W ❑ Q O O m c r. C1 > J r- O v� 1 1 1 Y W B O Y Q 1 a n Y 1 . N E- m Y E P ; Q -+ q m 1 m CD 1 Q O 1 3 1 W N F 1 Q tl ❑ Y 0 Z Y D 1 1 Z 1 Y m e m 1 < 1 3 Z I D 1 �+ E F- I (L ! � 1 U) B W A ❑ 1 1 ]= 1 W 1 M1 0 W L E u ¢ tl z 1 A m A O N O N z A W 1 m I I I I I I I I O O ,0 O O O O a O n h n OONOONnMMD omoonomomolnnoPnoo O O -0 O O n O M O P m cmv 0 n 0 0 N hP mn0nnntD000h0Na 0 -+-+00 n In m n N m h O n n.00�Om m 0, mC70N hN0,.n.nN.00.'o0n(.On P N N -0 O ,0 P -+ C.ON�tno MD) ON �OC')r)w)r)(no-N N- 000N04-T -m 0 ^' c m f` n m m m �0 n N P N - M -+ M N 0^ N N p .. m CL JhfdC)hm0 mPh ml')a mPmP.Oh PO --NCB 7n. OhmPO-Nmgn,oNm0. 0-Nm4Tn.0l-mP0 M V 00NNhh 0 CD, D- N t, nnPPP0000000000 - + -+ - - - -+ - ..+NfJNNNNNCJNNt'i W Cdhhmm f')C)QMnLn 0 0.0.0 mm0P PP O'OPPOPPPPP PP OPPPPPPP Cr- P PPP0.0- 0- 0, 0- 0- > N N h P P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ONNNN -- -O c- c------OO-------MO-Oc-Occ----------- Y U 1 I I I I 1 1 3 1 I I I i i Y!>FyC i g W 2 m a P N O P n O O m U a O N h h P h fd 0 P O # h h P O O O O O O O O # N N N m O m M (" 1 C') (9 c Ln Ln W L W Z ' LL C9 ' J ' ' a w w : (L a a i D d f D m 0 F N F- D L L U) N F E Z L L L W W 0 F- U) L Z L (n W W W W W❑ W U U Z W< W W W W U ❑ u E a uL) ..mW- . -�--QF - - E., Z Z z ❑ W z J<VJ »JZ j Ln J W J ❑Lr; W D ¢ Z L C9 <<J a > - a. mm J <UD- ZLL LL W CL Ln C1 Lo L^ E W Z D m Z ZZ<Law >a. W W - Z C1DWL.. LLIW V (1£mW WD< > w W W D .- W W 1- W D Z Er D Ln U) o W U D w- - -+ -- D D D D V' 4- ¢ W F- U W CL Cl m tL F - F- ZDL - WM F- ZLW J J > L min x W> Cl- O Z Z m £ L E E c z W ❑ >L JJ >Z - ma(1 a- CL mZ EE <mm ¢ O H O �- J ' -- m w I W <<J - Y W mC1W a WOWw -W2 < X Z ¢ > Z Z U O U W W << EL U J «l V Z Z =< m V Z D D U D D L- U m w U U Z m O O E ❑ O O O m > EE--Z< ZOOF -r<zo t,C:7zmm f- Zr�(LZ cm < •• •• ❑ m ❑ W ZZ<F- In<�- -�-Z a.¢- < F-<< <W � -� - U W W W ❑ WW WLZZWZLLO W Zr > >Z > >UmZJ ZZ ZF-J D < J J < < m > m C9 J Em W LLB -WLLE J ❑W <mmW7m<F -W <0W -< m U U W W W m F m < O ULa w'rm JF- W W UZr W «F-Q<X LJ1r U -F- JW L. F O �. > m m W W W W F- ��- M CL ZW- L+ -¢ - DZXXtr Z(Y SF- "Z- 1-ZOm- L J S D¢mm -W W <W - - <- -0W <wD< QW < ¢ > F- m m ❑ L ❑ E R >>wEE0LEm a. > >mEm J JE J JUmEEF -EC7m V V z W D O O V W L £ J J O < ❑ W W r 0 CZ J Z .z. c ¢ r W r V r m Y L V - m w J F W r w m Z F- > L O W Z w W F O S m o E CL - L F- > a 2 J Z ' L u o o < w �-+ w < cr m W L V cr n 3 km km E W < J z Q Z ❑ Z W 0 2 D W D C9 ❑ < N W a W m W h N N q n v n CJ O N a -0-t P a m h n h t7 O c F- W U Z W V m O W < Z L V v 3 D D U Z ❑ O Z Z > 11 m ¢ O < m Z < C: > J W L r O O S L Z r a. J L > m _ C9 < ¢ ¢ - m C9 L Z W Z CL W 2 z W F- ❑ W W D D U - E m H u V > V Z >UZr F-J U)ZS O <V >J -z S ' -W Jczu <F-0 < W - U) L) - +WF - < L- EL >m -- 2 D0 -- -m J> r " Um W W W < m O L M LUCO W < -J Z. - W 2 qL Z Z m Wh- " ZSm> WO Wr<W L -M(0- md.+< w¢ < 0 LZr rU m❑Lm¢ZD vaDY<F L <W�» Z > D W ¢ L❑W L V mum >O<(10 - <Y V JF- La m F W EF- E O L<¢ 0 - -r❑Lr O Z a. au — <�• w O may- L <Omm a zL Lq< < - m❑uDL Z --Z YE3Dm0 <L W <<Zo E as W O m a D¢ v D z w z W w - z c z r o E E J z W OL OJD r <Sm > - -Z - mWZ >¢z <O J Y m W J Jm--J3 wJm<L L, ¢J¢ W J Omni a D W < OZ -1 0 0 W <ZYWC)mm O W mF >Z < I< m J a m m m m D<¢ W W O m m D D¢ < << W Z S L < < <<<<¢<<<<<< g q m m m m m m m V U U U V V V V n in 0 -- M0,rj0 -+14' h OhNCdM-TMMrl.D..0nhn..-mm-OC m O -+ h- TM'oNCUo0.00L' M M 0 M--r'o0, N 0, M M 't -0 CO M -C n 10 m 0 rd m0-.Oam m0. m 0%m m ham it m^ N Q Qncomn nn O 0n17 nIT hn n On fJ N fJ t• r r �. r r r r � .� ... r r r r r P m P Q -- G" Z o m E m - Q F- I U Z 'Y- < O Z 3 Q D O Ir -. F- O: W U W O W J Y � o U nr 1 1 1 LLJ i � r a 1 a r r 1 r � m 1 E a�Q D,Icr 1 m m A d O r 3 1 W r F- 1 Q 1 D A Z 1 D / Ir 1 1 O 1z 1 1 D: is 1 3 z O F IL 0: V N w ❑ E W f- W E Q Z m O ❑ Z W > 0 -0000 0,004am000-00000001 -00 n0 o OOONOO 000m l00^ OOnN000o a O NMOIt noo 0 Mn -,0 I7 01nriuivioon.:.:uimomcvofi6.oc -cmo OP -0M0N 00.OPmvL�Pmn t N 0 0 .0 w 0 N 0, M 4 — N 0 —,a —M m m— NP no nn — nN It - o .4 ri p , N r, r, m0ItM0110nM000a N 0 0 " n 0 M 0 0Nn- 0 -4 - I.n00 C- 00MNNC 0 -:ria o - RrItM0 -,w 0-- nmMM10m �o- •- .0WNnN in N -0MMN- a,, - M aMP nvc�- r�onvaN -n - -M .+Q M N a n J- NM4;r0,00- NM,:r0-aNMUl0 -N MIT 0 01�mP0 aNM q,C OPmP O -N M tn,cNmPO -Nm-:r ¢��r MM- tavvcva vavnonon00000.0'4'0'0'0.O.0 -4 4 NNNNnnnnnnmmmmm W P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P 01 P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P PPP P P P P P P 0- P >000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 s s w x I x x x x x x I s x s x x x s x Z n v U c1 0 P P # O O # I") m Ln - - w �+ O J N N W W o w a It Z z D U) U) O Z Z J m > N F- W 0 �-+ LO F- I in J a w W D D U) U) z F z W Z F W W w - Z G U) V U) E d U) ❑ W w O V M W Z U) W W V m (n Q W Z W Q U) W JF- W- ❑ EO W W m W O:- W F-m- Q - m-- Il.J ❑J C J - CUh >Z❑W EU ❑- U >U) W- WU' J Z J U' C J -ILZd Z - UZZa cr DZU) - ZJ w -W m W ZJ w d w a W O O-w 1: (L DIL D m DQ -m W W Dm W> DO_ mm >m w Od Ewa- F IL U)xF ILm In DWD W 0U. z cr WLn WDZ¢❑t,-tL 0 W Z X to Ia ID Z Dzaz Dzm min LUn w mzwwQ -- WwmF- wzwDz - WawW > ILO WF- U') ••a. mw <m cnwF- W m Uim W - X< -Ln OWE MDXMDJV KOU JX WN W OQE VtrZZ V Z mW WZ F-s ZmdQ - LW W Wd -O - QW J F•W WZEO W W - W WOOW - W EUZUOZ dmZ- DILZZZ WO-I WZZ WILJUe;JZN WZ F-O V- V U V JU<- - -ZUJE W Z OZ -O 3000U)DOOOm MOO MD O F-O - ZF- W Z Z V',F ---Z W E¢ al - - (L - F M - • W to U M a W M - - - E0<Wa.M < < 0 0 a CL m < m w ZF- Zd F- > F- > mF - I- Ww W Fh-F -F U)W W LO W >HWEZ Zwd W Z UI X tr - - Z UI -+ JW Q W UQ J❑d F-m W 0000 >" - +QQ W W X - +W M JQ U' 0 W EU= W W W GM1 -Iii W F QF- W i- - W 2ZW WQUWUWQO -Jw W0U?UZmJzwx ZWdUF - F- mcx F- F- z J)JUm F- Zx DZm ZJ5 F- DmW m - W 0m WJO_Om - O - - W a. - W w F- mw i zZQCw ZZ - CU7W Z- W z -m V Z W U m m L, O J U J d O_ d V m O. Liw W d 00 F- z Jm - - EZ W - 0Zzm > -U)> Z Q W Q D W O W W x j LU D W w m W W D W D D m Z O W- D m Q V d W- Q Q D W< D Q D QEm SILO: £D:mNJOfLQO: £wU)❑tr- ❑Dm ❑U)m0_- EtrEU)tLE- +JCOEEOEJUJQ EmQ m w v z CL 2 v o> Z J W V - m m z m W - D F- a F m £ V S W Z S D 0 0 � O Z F Z J m S Q d Q O JW EEzJ Z cr- O w O m > m - m N W 4 Ul t- W Z V F- W w ¢ F- minF - O_Om w d¢ E Z D -10 0 0 00 U V U V U V m- O -t']17 7- M-0PM P N m O in m n c O It It 0 rd N i U) V Z O - d U) U U W m Ul dY z w D CD .... F- z o Z v Z O U) ¢ O D 03 Q J W U ❑ E I-- Ln U) - ❑ O J O Q W j F-Z m J x u Q JU)m m ¢ )w ¢ 0- D Z - - O W UO J U V m 02 cr Ll F- .. F- F- W -0 Z w 0- < V F-F-Z m z w 0 OF- F- >mJ 3 > W Z - Z s F- V- I D Q J m Q dF- -U JdW UmQ F- UIL Zm d V O z x W N ox W E m Q F- Z E mw U Z m m z 7 W J D 0 a F- Q O W> m E O D V U) _ O Q U W J - OmUF -F- W QO d❑Ez mF- > - a _cru vzmwU U' 10 WIZO -m W NMM I > W- mW Z _GU Ec<m U) WZ�-w- -j -1 O J 0 0 Z Z- 0 Q W m > I D W W J- Z W E- -�COF -O Z W -IM CD0 u, Z U)<OwF- Q F Z W I> m s s m -- Z Z m w❑ m m❑ VmU7e*3> W JZUW mm---- m- ZOGJF- D D D d d W W W W- Z Z Z 3 3 Q m D W- O w UUVC ❑❑❑❑0❑❑W W W W WLi Li W U' U' 00 0- 0D,.0N- Mr, I,7m-0mP - -0,'tN 0 M N M MMrd7NN -N a nc') - NNrd - o 0Nmm 00 It n .0�0IT00 �N.0 0.0 r) n Z Ui IL m D ¢ D t` mw z > n- caw z v0 m �F- a zF- v d iA. JJ> E -0 1 U) U W JJm ❑ O O V V - m O D D W 0 U V Z mF--- C mCmU)O - Ul l- U) Z W r ¢ m L� w m F- DO £w❑ »D U' O - V F- IY Ir F- V m _ Z 2 d D DzrF -JJ _ V P m clu o ❑ w U<< C Z¢ d W J w > -ZU OEF- W S -U)OC❑ J¢ <>Z-J- xwzJa_m d W - w Z F- s> O_ 2 W W m G w F- >> 'n Z Zmw.!Z U V -E Q >m<W W W m m ') -❑Z WF-WF- Q + -J J Jr Q OW WMM WIL W4XZJI (L❑JJOZJ L.o -Za 0<m- w¢w£wQQID -- -mQ- > W V F-❑ -m W E >> 3 ❑¢ JEE3 >Q =InQ W Zm V> dad ¢❑ I m WF- ❑❑00❑❑Lna V J >za -F-OE dU)ZZzZz Z Q W D d d d Q Q Q❑ U) W m¢> J J Q❑ U£ ❑❑ J J J J J J R U Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Q O 02222 2IZ----------- )-') N P v n O m- n M N- -0 a -0 m N N n n n M P N in in n�, P O m rd IT in M O P N- n N - -0nm-- 0a--m- mN P -M m- n n N V O n- 0M N O O M M P P m P a -- 0 Z E M 01 aF1 u z P D < -+ U¢I m m O a O 2 3 z W 0 <00 Fm tLmw o.�a J > s F D W U r) 1 1 1 1 W M d t Q / CL 1 t 1 e r aI¢ A m m 1 Q O 1 3 1 t W 1 F 1 Q 1 A 1 Z 1 D / ¢ 1 1 Z 1 ¢ 1 m A d / 3 z O IL m U U1 W ❑ E W F W E d z m O ❑ z W > inonl0000mo nuomoNnNOP -0a om n000 nvMrl,00nn0D.- 0"0- tn,N.n- .millM0n0O (lmtoPP� P- +Lnr)0M O.OR - + - 0O N - +Ra in O N. OmPNNmQctmNQNPPPPmNa -0mv 4m,0.0 In N a �r An -. P m -1 N (1) n < m P P OOOnNmon-t- 0-+- om000 no00 a Na0%rnMn�ONNN- 000 -Don 0mOOnP rIC Od,Om PPNammOnN- PPOCINO OC)ONOOmmON m-OnnMOm -4P,0 lr1 LnC)PN in- .inf7N C77gr 0 r cl) m N -+ - P N CL Q J0 0NMP0 -NM a N -On mPO - NC)et n.OnmPO -+NM T N,OnmPO -+NM VT 0NmP0 -+NO V n ¢mmmmmPPPPPP 01 01 P01 0000000000 - + -+ -+ - rdNNrYNNNNrd 1C)C)r)r)r) M W P P P P P P P P P P 0' P P P P O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O >000000000000000 ------------------------------------ x Y w x a a x xIx xx a xa as a 2 rJ u -+ # # m J a a W U) UI S Ln u Ln W rn Ln N w N Z W U) w U W Ln W m +-+ F W < W V 'r - W w JZ - Z J Z > Jam+ J m a_wJw a -i < m aJSn Wa ELU aEaF a_ a Loz Lnw aa.w Ua WU D >az D a Ww E W 0 Da- -D E- U)<7- m D DF a- Ln DJ >Ln > CL m< z m z z ¢ J J Lr) a m F m w EOLn w o -00 CL- w a ww zw u¢Z - wZU Z-- a<ZOa<ZUZDZW V Z W N ZOO WFDOZ OF —r -+mDEOZOU)O zoo <F aaA - < -+a S Ln(LM - < - "Fa D> ZuF< -+ Fz LnLU FFZF WF VzHFF wD<um J<W F m W (n U <sm-i Wm<W QU «W <Ll < W < � W m F W m zF¢ALnDmzU¢Lnm�wa�LnmzmsmFZSUID �+U)UZOZU- WU=E2 >SJW V -V O V Z"UPU azw<DZw<�wDww ❑womw<wFwoawPw E�mJN<mEE¢LnE >amaamE¢ Lnm vEm -+tn V m Z O la. W O W > F V F Z m z ¢ Ln Z a O O O W w a P m a m J F w F F O O O Q m m W V r) E ¢ cr O J V < a > a .. < J D J a muV' O ❑ au N O z W Z V < a Z N > W V Jm Ui¢ ZO Ln =) - < F O QI+iU' OZ W V U) V Z J mJ -FW UE fj- Z Lnz WC9 m p<FZ - 00 0ZUI m¢ >m W - <m D wV UIWJ UIU)V F .- - +EF S¢m Zm3m L) ❑- Wx<Z -" U >DLn F<0 - Q<W U) W ❑3wV w3vww -W JDF <UF- W 3 -W U) W V EW mW W xjCLazu I w z 0 >> SE WmL�- J <J JU - m z m <<W V a0DZ z W ¢aJ - Lr) - WU)E - ZZS Z JaL� W 0 00U)SuJ I LnFJ LnO - mO - >QUZW> z V <Zm3U)W W W -< J D❑Lr) W D Ln r.4 a Q< NS"W W <<J J JF -FF x Jm ❑ 0 --LU ,YY(nFFSEm - +<W Z S O"W Z3< -3a wwrwmmmm) - Um mmDZ<0 Z O a< a w w w o O O a<< a a< U- D O O O D Y Y J J J J J J J J J E E E E E E E E E E E E E E Z Z in w J a D U) U) C) Z .. Z W D Ln U) N O UI V N La Ln W W W W- W .+ W W W V F H >- s L7 Ln U, _j J Z u J¢ J Ln ❑ W ❑ Z waa_a <Dawaw wz Zwa slncnaa a. z❑aNacn U -i DE a_ wWzDDD wwD D cna W >D WU)MT F❑LnmLnw >�.:w LU <Lr, J J V Z W u w m m m V D m a aa-W Ww »NwFW +FFW ..U) in a. aJuQuz<wuDUJDOmz> zcr z DD Z Z Z C E W Z C L Z 00 O m W O O< W (nfnaa< -+ a QEQU)oAC9- +t:,aN�r U)zzz w z0zIn Zrr. <DFUW lL W w W W W< J❑ W U W W }} .. M - - -+ Z- WL�L,au0ZDuWX LLWDaaaWwwaaaDaamwWaowzw OomEEE¢ >mE3Em(nLn.Fm� JF¢ -DUI ,Z., F O V z Q U > > F Z z Ln J Z r w a W s U' ¢ a E z a D a w -3 O 0 V a❑ c D W W Z c. m a ..m J O ¢m< LLi m m< a J W 0 0- G r2 m Z < FF-j Z V LD O m 4 UIU)aZ =_ } U r W E < Ln > J :J > D > Ln W w O S r H O m r-CL Dam OJJ 00uC <CtX - < O Za¢ WZ - m JO =S L 3 W W J0J a. xDDF j ¢ 0j-0 m 0 2 - L�ZD -0 w < 0 m V a3t -mamF 0M • -7¢ ❑EU WLn Ln 0C9- MZJ SW A J F.> Z Z F ❑ O V F ww Wmwzw❑¢zZFO --<U)m wT O u U U' < O U W W<- U 3 3 J W< Z U¢ - J .. ZSZF¢<F❑EJ DZ S- mwx W W a V W F W E¢ D F < E ❑❑ C7 U m W E L7 W W L�¢¢3 <-- OOmDDa W W W S- -GDDD< D o 0 0 o a a a a a a O m m m m m m m m¢ m Ln mrd- »�mnmvLnNOnNC�n�nP�moo�ora�t� rlrla��n- LnoNO- »PVI�NPmvooaa� - +n- +rJaPa r)In 00mn.0NN0 CNP OinPNinnn rJON,Or MLr, n-+ a Omvq •00 - qr PO< rJ- +7r)•C- +m-m,4NP nnPPm0- +mmNOmad' in V NQN VrMNN -t0D, nY),OOZ MD,Pnn N Ono n (n 0 N O n qNO N nmhO4Th (n m O r) rl) m -- -- -• P P W P a.. z O m £ U ^P V Z P V m I O E O S 3 v 1. ao °o m F- m L, cn w O i J > m � O LL 'v a e 1 A A / w 1 C9 1 Q A a 1 1 1 n � m 1 £ P A Q P 1 1 m cr CO 1 Q O 1 3 1 w 1 H A Q A I Z 1 1 ¢ n n O 9 z 1 cr N o 1 Q 1 3 Z 0 H CL m U Ul W ❑ E w F- ii LU II Q n z 11 II II O: II O II ❑ II z 11 W II > 1 O O r P -.non -. O o o O m O 1 f� o o m m -• d) rd In o i•J o 0 0 0 N t1 0 0 -0 !7 Call olItC7NNNNUNI('Ira r�c�oPOOr`(�0000nomPr.r�oomonoo n P('IO.00nt� mnOn OOnPa C]nnOP1ON0('1 C] PN0nt7 -+•+•• ri -+mM mNmO -• nOnna m MM0N•O(�mO• R0 It f'7 4 I m n M -+ rd0M0 O 00 a - -+ n CD m M N 0 a r, Q JO I�mPO- +Nf'lan•OhmPO- �CJ('1aNO1�mP O-+NMI 0-4rmO.O- +NMIO.Ohm It It nnnnnnnn0'o•4Zo o•a.o44• o.onnnnnnnnn w0000000OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOo oc�-c- -- - -t7---ro�c�c- i Y 1U S N V N O CL w U? r Uf UI W O ❑ Y z Z V Z m k L W w W W (P E -• U) m m U) CO UI ❑WJ ❑ W Ul❑ ❑ ZU)m J W W VU)W Z Z Dc�1L W Q Do mm -•w— D D W DDum3LL W ZZ > -+J W IL W m w_ W w w- W W m J d W w mE >-+Z(r V V W a.Ecr O: -•w¢Jw aw- - wa.5 Z W VwcLcrz LUJJ DU]z Z 0 c ZU)IL 0DZ >cr, 0 0 .. Q DF- - »NQNUI� - a— U) F- W Z > U) u F- Z U) N -+ > £ F- W F- < 0 W J Q Q W W W W Z=<< -• Q WQF•SF•mW VHZZDQU W J W m W Z F-Z F- ¢— Z- +-E= W ILo V J- Z-• zuL� - - m0E o> V a V W- •¢000WL.<DD0- < W D W mEEE£ VmO£ooUJ ❑¢(n tY F- V Z Z E Z Z E O U U1 Z U1 W E 1-£a w w US (n O D F_ V- m J¢O0 U7 - •ZD M3mm > > V IL M U' W m D m C > 7 w E u W -+ > w m eY cn F- J m U J W U UI Q QOQ— W Wm Z-•D Q m Z£ m F > S O: W- 3 u E J Q J O¢ OmU1DF• -•¢ QZ J m >OOm W F_WOUIE MZ <m W W (Z -+U N — Qu C-• LO¢Ui ❑ Z O (XZE WOZ(.OW" •0zaz Wm .3 xa -• cr YC) .N F-CL W O ❑OW OQme� Q m J Q m❑ N W - W Q W N F F- W S CL Zz J >mZ (r mJF- J E Z Z Z Q S Q m W C 9 x x Q Q -. -, Q Q Q Q Q U U W W . -+ -• -• E E E E UI (n UI U] N U7 W !n UI N N N W U7 N !n N -• J UI > Q U) m F 0 d w 0 Z_ £ LO F_ U7 Q J J V Ln # _j -Jr U) W # W > -+ (1) U7 (J1 ❑❑J ❑ C ❑❑❑ ❑ ❑❑ ❑C_❑ — V JWUZZa zzzz z U3 Zz Za.ZJ - "JU -+DDd z555D D W DD DDDIL m �• �-+ <L k D LL W W 1L W W V to 1� w w w w W IL F -o >F-W WNEW wWILV Wt-� wW WW W W:) V crucrm QmxmxZmZ> - xm -•mwxm WNW W 0 Q LUm WJ J Z JQ(AJZZZOZZZZ >ZE WvaZZdZ_zz WO W OOQ0000_O❑D >w_(LOO11OSOO > >u >F-F -W dF -F•NF- F•a£mm F- HN "rQHF- J J Q J Q Q U Q Q Q Q J Q mw Q Q <r<< SS¢SW W -•SW W WW WWWOWF-WWF -W W W ZZZ Zvc��DC;c:c�vQ Va�(n� Vv- •uac.� V 000DwwwowwwW�wwzaawWawoww ££V Etr �U7 >ms��F- mJDDEIr�£mUmm F- U1 J Q V Li a. Z U7 N F- W a_ v o � W D > W IZ ^J x V O Q W W -• V W W O U) > V (i V z m w— Z ¢ F £ W Z J O > Z o O J W W F- m U) -• Q -+ m O V k C9 O m z m In O J F• > W UI ❑-+ W o Q l4QDW J Q I >QSUI -�U)m J WmF 0 HF - wm -+W ZZcr mF- ❑QQQ —U' w<<mWmF- ZUF_ZQWQOQJ W U' 3u0 Ul 4- -»-•d❑ DmZQ — W E1LYQ ❑ 0-1 £ ZZm ZY Q- MQJ m u ILllwz ❑F- DDS •QZF•2QD Y _O a m cr - U7 Ul u > Q Ul IL (n • Z u J ❑ JJ W OQF•m O - mm❑ m . W JW QQUJSJIi❑ W W _ _F-t1 -•WQ W WF•xQE V UHF -SZ ❑U' > ❑a-+U1D (�F- F- ❑Z -�F-DZ JD QQOmQCCYJOfA- +- +Ulmlz x-+mmW OOOOF- F•HQSOOOOtr ZZ- •QQQSWald (AU)U)NUIUINF- F•F•F -H F•F• 7�� >3333x >N .nCpaNlhNnV�flaant`r\ Om r- a,MNOO•na—NNMha0f, 0o M 0 omrf 0O m-+ P Mn - M Na-00P 0, P1P NP NP - •OMOO•N aOOOO000MrdoOO- 0000, 01 0InN- MO - •IPP0Pf'1P IT 0, MM0%100,MMO000a. 0- •ICJ - 0 0 N 0 n 0 M ONO — 0- •NOOaO- ono n— -+On N- +-+ 6 CITY OF RANCTIO CITCA7NION-GA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 2, 1998 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Maria Perez, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF PARCEL MAP NO. 15083, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF JERSEY BOULEVARD, EAST OF WHITE OAK AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY KARUBIAN RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution approving Parcel Map No. 15083, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to cause said map to record. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS Parcel Map 15083, located on the south side of Jersey Boulevard, east of White Oak Avenue in the Minimum Impact General Industrial Development District, was approved by the Planning Commission on February 11, 1998 for the division of 10.06 acres into 2 parcels. The property was previously annexed into the appropriate landscape and lighting districts with the development review application for the industrial building. The necessary public improvements were bonded for and are in the process of completion. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:dlw Attachments I: ST IFFPPZ\P&1I5083.wpd 16 i - -- -- _ARROW ROUTE - - - - - - z z __ TACOMA-AVENUE, Q Y z I_ - _ - -- - JERSEY BOULEVARD TPM 15083 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION ITEM: TPM 15083 TITLE: Vicinity Map EXHIBIT: "A" RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 15083 WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map No. 15083 submitted by Karubian, and consisting of 2 parcels located on the south side of Jersey Boulevard, east of White Oak Avenue, being a division of 10.06 acres was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on February 11, 1998, and is in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and Local Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that Act; and WHEREAS, Parcel Map No. 15083 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and WHEREAS, said Developer submits for approval said Parcel Map offering for dedication, for street, highway and related highway purposes, the streets delineated thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES, that the offers for dedication and the final map delineating the same for said Parcel Map No. 15083 is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. /a UIT Y Ur' HANUHU U U UAMUN UA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 2, 1998 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Duane A. Baker, Assistant to the City Manager SUBJECT: RESOLUTION APPROVING A TAXICAB SERVICE PERMIT TO BELL CAB COMPANY On August 19, 1998, the City Council held a public hearing to determine if the public interest, convenience and necessity was met by the issuance of a taxicab service permit to Bell Cab Co. After hearing the testimony, the City Council directed that a resolution approving the permit be prepared for their consideration. Attached for the City Council is the resolution approving the issuance of the permit and making findings in support of that decision. The findings listed in the resolution are as follows: The addition of taxi service will be responsive to a public necessity that increased services be provided to senior citizens. 2. The addition of taxi service will be responsive to a public necessity that increased services be provided to persons with disabilities. 3. No evidence was presented in opposition to the application to indicate that granting the application would depreciate the level of service in the City. In addition to the above findings, the resolution will also require that taxicab service providers supply periodic reports regarding response and waiting times. Staff will use the information to monitor the performance of the taxicab service providers and to look for any signs that performance or customer service is adversely impacted. Upon adoption of this resolution, the permit will be issued to Bell Cab Co. and will conclude the proceedings as outlined in Chapter 8.30 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. Respectfully Submitted, Duane A. Baker Assistant to the City Manager /dab 13 RESOLUTION NO. __2y' /SCE A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A TAXICAB SERVICE PERMIT A. Recitals. (i) Pursuant to Chapter 8.30 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, an application was filed by BELL CAB COMPANY ( "the application" hereinafter) for a permit to operate a taxicab service within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. (ii) The application was processed in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 8.30 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, and a duly noticed public hearing concerning the application was conducted and concluded on August 19, 1998. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determine and resolve as follows: All of the facts stated in the Recitals, Part A, of this resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented during the above- referenced public hearing, this Council hereby finds and determines as follows: a. The addition of taxi service to be provided by the applicant within the City of Rancho Cucamonga will be responsive to a public necessity that increased services be provided to senior citizens; b. The addition of taxi services to be provided by the applicant within the City of Rancho Cucamonga will be responsive to a public necessity that increased services be provided to handicapped persons; and No evidence was presented in opposition to the application to indicate that granting the application would depreciate the level of service provided to persons in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. S \RC \RTAX12 \RC 1.19 1 �y 3. Based upon substantial evidence presented during the above- referenced hearing and the specific findings made in Paragraph 2 above, this Council hereby finds, determines and concludes that the public interest, convenience and necessity justify granting the application and issuing the permit applied for. 4. Based on the findings, determinations and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 2 and 3 above, this Council hereby approves the application. 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. A. Staff shall require IL service providers to Supply pei10C11C reports regarding response and waiting times experienced by persons using taxi services in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. ADOPTED AND APPROVED this day of , 1998. Mayor I, DEBRA ADAMS, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of , 1998, and was finally adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of , 1998, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ATTEST: City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga S \RC \RTAXI2 \RC 1.19 2 5 STAFF REPORT DATE: September 2, 1998 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Henry Murakoshi, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR ROCHESTER AVENUE, CHURCH STREET, TERRA VISTA PARKWAY EAST STREET IMPROVEMENTS RELATED TO TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 15072, GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ROCHESTER AVENUE AND BASE LINE ROAD, SUBMITTED BY LEWIS HOMES ENTERPRISES, INC. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject agreement and security related to Tentative Tract Map No. 15072 and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS: Tentative Tract Map No. 15072, generally located at the southwest corner of Rochester Avenue and Base Line Road, was approved by the Planning Commission on the 24th day of June, 1998, for a residential subdivision of 545 single family lots on 90 acres of land in the Low Medium Residential Designation within the Terra Vista Community Plan. Lewis Homes Enterprises, Inc., desire to commence construction on the perimeter street of Tentative Tract 15072 prior to approval of final map. The Developer, Lewis Homes Enterprises, Inc., a California Corporation, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the constriction of the public improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $2,102,000 Labor and Materialmen Bond: $1,051,350 Copies of the agreement and security signed by the Developer are available in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:Hhl:dlw hments /(0 r---- VIM 2A- ------ >-�---- - - - - ---- --- JRjiLTD!� 1 I I gst to ROAD , I I �r}I I.r w a nl I Mt W Irt STRtIT N N, `; W n. �� STRUT - yr K w i 1 N •H w r F1 1 , w 1pM�f ,M w ra r w u• � •� � rY 11F/,1.(J rr 1 L I W ••� ••r ti ' 0" IMET _ 1 1 w rw aF a' 1 R i t1 fi M , n IH 11r � W , I• I, „ 1 HI � In �� IY W \ � .` \�� • I L ,•� SMET ti T Y ,n1 n. • ` IV 1 r • • r, w I fn r I.. r I.• u. n1 •S• N rl, y �r SIRCLT .0 1 5 yt= ♦ nr a. ,,. r Ir. 1 n, r I•I I„I t I -r -7- .. r SIT-[ UT � 111 , 1 a; fit, 1 I 1 �rl \ I I n� ♦ � ,n \ \ �f \ Sourcc: Madole avid Associates, Inc. -M slap 5 • 1 F .a 1 ' r " j i n• •� •ref 6T,� ,. ,I,. � Y ; cc* SMUT r 1 1 I N n Y u H I rrM • 1• U H „ Y 'r I � •N•f S,RtLT , 1 1 sycr D.� VICINITY MAP TENTATIVE TRACT 1072 /7 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR ROCHESTER AVENUE, CHURCH STREET, TERRA VISTA PARKWAY EAST STREET IMPROVEMENTS, RELATED TO TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 15072 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 15072, submitted by Lewis Homes Enterprises, Inc., a California Corporation, consisting of 545 lots, generally located at the southwest corner of Rochester Avenue and Base Line Road, was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on June 24, 1998; and WHEREAS, Lewis Homes Enterprises, Inc., desire to commence construction on the perimeter streets of Tentative Tract 15072 prior to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City and provide an Improvement Agreement guaranteed by acceptable Improvement Security, by Lewis Homes Enterprises, Inc., a California Corporation, as developer; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property as referred to Tentative Tract Map No. 15072. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, HEREBY RESOLVES that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the City Clerk to attest. W'*J 1.. 1 1. Y UP fileNL;tgi-�U t i.;t_A- `N1(.)N0 -A TA REPORT DATE: September 2, 1998 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Joseph E. Stofa Jr., Associate Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO TRANSFER LOT "A" OF TRACT NOS. 13425 AND 12046 TO STATE OF CALIFORNIA (CALTRANS) FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF SR 30 FREEWAY RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve a Resolution authorizing the City Engineer, on behalf of the City, to execute documents to transfer the subject properties from the City to the State of California (Caltrans) for the purpose of constructing SR 30 Freeway. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS During the planning and designing process for Tract No. 13425, a small triangular piece of land was set aside for future freeway development on the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and Highland Avenue. The property was dedicated at no cost to the City on the Tract Map by the Developer. It was intended for the eastbound on ramp at Haven Avenue. During the planning and designing process for Tract No. 12046, a small triangular piece of land was set aside for future realignment of Highland Avenue east of the future Day Creek Boulevard due to the construction of SR 30. The property was dedicated at no cost to the City on the Tract Map by the Developer. The State of California (Caltrans) is now requesting the property be turned over to them for construction of the SR 30 Freeway. There will be no cost to the City in the transfer of these properties. Respectfully submitted, Wil iam J. O'Neil City Engineer Attachments: Resolution /9 k u 1 2 0 W - J �1� o i 1 3nN3AV N3AVH L-, > • o a i L) V 1- 1977= CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION VICINITY MAP titie_; 71?�NSF�� Page a� Proposed Route 30 Freeway Highland Ave. LOT "A" Rockrose Ave. Locust Ave. Victoria Windrows Loop Southern Pacific Rail Road Base Line Road Victoria Park Lane a > a� ¢ > Cc 3 � W 0 > 5 M 1~ w Foot hill Blvd. title' CITY OF R.�NCI-10 CUCA�•IONGA ' �tl -t ENGINEERING DIVISION VICINITY MAP 1v page 10� iy n RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND SIGNING OF DOCUMENTS FOR THE TRANSFER OF PROPERTIES TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA (CALTRANS) FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF SR 30 FREEWAY WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has for its consideration and execution, documents to transfer properties, referred to as Lot "A" for Tract Nos. 13425 and 12046, to State of California for the construction of SR' 0 Freeway within Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, the documents have been review and approved by staff; and WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to transfer the subject properties to the State of California (Caltrans). NOW, THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OR RANCHO CUCAMONGA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: 1. Authorize the City Engineer to execute the documents which will transfer the properties to the State of California (Caltrans). 2. Direct the City Clerk to attach a certified copy of this Resolution to the Legal Documents signed by the City Engineer to be used by the State of California (Caltrans) in recording same. ffiffi CITY OF RANCHO (111CAINI.O' G A, STAFF REPORT DATE: September 2, 1998 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Joseph E. Stofa Jr., Associate Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY PARTS I AND H FOR THE PROPOSED FOOTHILL- HERMOSA STORM DRAIN INSTALLATION AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATIONS AND ISSUANCE OF A STATUTORY EXEMPTION THEREFORE RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve adopt the attached Resolution accepting and approving the Environmental Initial Study, Parts I and II, for the proposed improvement at Foothill Boulevard and Hermosa Avenue and direct the City Clerk to file a Statutory Exemption. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS This report presents an Environmental Assessment Initial Study Parts I and II forthe proposed storm drain installation along portions of Hermosa Avenue, Center Avenue and Foothill Boulevard to Deer Creek Channel. In addition, the intersection of Hermosa Avenue and Foothill Boulevard will be widened and existing traffic signals relocated. In conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act and State Guidelines, the attached document has been prepared to permit construction of the above mentioned improvements. It is the Engineering staff s finding that the proposed project will not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and therefore recommend that these improvements be classified as statutory exempt. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:JS Attachments a3 AA1 title; ``' " "' CITY OF Rr�NCI-10 CUC JMONGA Fa�rfl 1 �� /Vlenw oS of ENGINEERING DIVISION VICINITY MAP N 1977 � Page X 2 RESOLUTION NO. y8 _ 1c53 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY PARTS I AND II AND ISSUANCE OF A STATUTORY EXEMPTION FOR THE PROPOSED FOOTHILL - HERMOSA STORM DRAIN INSTALLATION AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATIONS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has reviewed all available input concerning the proposed improvements; and WHEREAS, said improvements require an Environmental Assessment; and WHEREAS, the proposed construction of improvements are in conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act and State Guidelines. NOW, THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OR RANCHO CUCAMONGA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: Approve the Environmental Assessment and Issuance of a Negative Declaration for the proposed storm drain and traffic signal modification. Section 2: Direct the City Clerk to file a Notice of Statutory Exemption pursuant to the Public Resources Code 21080 et seq, State California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15260 et seq and other provisions of state law. a5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM PART I - INITIAL STUDY The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City policies, ordinances, and guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full; INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. Please note that it is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the application is complete at the time of submittal; City staff will not be available to perform work required to provide missing information. General Information Application Number for the project to which this form pertains: N/A Project Title: Foothill- Hermosa Storm Drain Installation and Traffic Signal Modifications Name & Address of project owner(s): City of Rancho Cucamonga, P. O. Box 807, Rancho Cucamonza, CA 91729 Contact Person & Address: Joe Stofa, Associate Engineer Telephone Number: (909) 477 - 2740, extension 2340 Name & Address of person preparing this form (if different from above): Same as above Telephone Number: Same as above - PROJECT INFORMATION & DESCRIPTION Information indicated by asterisk ( *) is not required of non - construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff. *1) Provide a full scale (8 `/z x 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the project site, and indicate the site boundaries. 2) Provide a set of color photographs which show representative views into the site from the north, south, east and west; views into and from the site from the primary access points which serve the site; and representative views of significant features from the site. Include a map showing location of each photograph. IM 3) Project Location (describe): Storm drain on Foothill Blvd. from Deer Creek Channel to Hermosa Ave. and on Hermosa Ave. to Church Street and Traffic signal modification at Foothill and Hermosa. 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers (attach additional sheet if necessary): APN 1077 - 601 -04, 05; 208 - 331 -17 22 27, 29 30. 1077- 621 -20 *5) Gross Site Area (ac /sq. Ft.): *6) Net Site Area (total site size minus area of public streets & proposed dedications): N/A 7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the project site (attach additional sheet if necessary): N/A 8) Include a description of all permits which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies in order to fully implement the project: Caltrans Permit SBCFCD Permit 9) Describe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the project including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on site (including age and condition) and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of significant features described. In addition, site all sources of information (i.e., geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and archeological surveys, traffic studies): Foothill Blvd is a street with parkways which contain undesirable Blue Gum trees, old vacant power poles and shrubs. There are no building structures involved The area is relatively at with agradual 1 -2% slope to the south. Hermosa Ave. has a narrow storm drain channel on the west side near Foothill Blvd. There is an existing traffic signal at this intersection. 10) Describe the known cultural and /or historical aspects of the site. Site all sources of information (books, published reports and oral history): There is an existing historical house located on the south side of Foothill Blvd. There are no plans to disturb the house. 2 o7-7 11) Describe any noise sources and their levels that now affect the site (aircraft, roadway noise, etc.) And how they will affect proposed uses: There is little to no aircraft noise: the vehicular traffic noise level will remain the same after construction as before construction. No additional noise is expected. 12) Describe the proposed project in detail. This should provide an adequate description of the site in termis of ultimate use which will result from the proposed project. Indicate if there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment. Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary: This project is the first phase upstream from Deer Creek Channel at Foothill Blvd. to Church Street. The second phase is the continuation of the drain upstream from Church Street to north of 19' Street. 13) Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one - family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.) And scale of development (height, frontage, setback rear yard, etc.): The property to the south is residential and commercial; to the west is residential and commercial: to the north is commercial: and to the east is commercial. 14) Will the proposed project change the pattern, scale or character of the surrounding general area of the project? 15) Indicate the type of short-term and long -term noise to be generated, including source and amount. How will these noise levels affect adjacent properties and on -site uses. What methods of sound proofing are proposed? Noise levels as they exist will not be increased. M * 16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees: A total of 17 trees (undesirable Blue Gum) will be removed along the south side o Foothill Blvd. (9) and the west side of Hermosa Ave. (8). All trees are within Citv right-of-way and are in very poor, unstable condition. 17) Indicate and bodies of water (including domestic water supplies) into which the site drains: The proposed storm drain will be deposited into the existingZ concrete lined Deer Creek Channel lust south of Foothill Blvd. 18) Indicate expected amount of water usage. (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification, please contact the Cucamonga County Water District at 987 -2591. a. Residential (gal /day N/A Peak use (gal /day) N/A b. Commercial/Inc. (gal /day /ac N/A Peak use (gal /min/ac) N/A Landscape/Park N/A 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal. N/A Septic Tank N/A Sewer. If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests. If discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation: (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification, please contact the Cucamonga County Water District at 987 -2591. RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS 20) Number of residential units: Detached (indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size: N/A Attached (indicate whether units are rental or for sale units): 21) Anticipated range of sale prices and/or rents: El Sale Price(s) $ $ Rent (per month) $ $ 22) Specify number of bedrooms by unit type: N/A 23) Indicate anticipated household size by unit type: N/A 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who will be residing within the project: Contact the appropriate School Districts as shown in Attachment B: a. Elementary: N/A b. Junior High: N/A c. Senior High: N/A COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Describe type of use(s) and major functions(s) of commercial, industrial or institutional uses: N/A 26) Total floor area of commercial, industrial, or institutional uses by type: N/A 27) Indicate hours of operation: 28) Number of employees: Total: N/A Maximum Shift: Time of Maximum Shift: 29) Provide breakdown of anticipated job classifications, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an indication of the rate of hire for each classification (attach additional sheet if necessary): 30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside in the City: E it *30 For commercial and industrial uses only, indicate the source, type and amount of air pollution emissions. (Data should be verified through the South Coast Air Quality Management District, at (818) 572 - 6283): ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies serving the project been contacted to determine their ability to provide adequate service to the proposed project? If so, please indicate their response. Water - CCWD - Provide water for construction only. SBCFCD - accept storm drain water. 33) In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials? Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include, but are not limited to PCB's; radioactive substances; pesticides and herbicides; fuel, oils, solvents, and other flammable liquids and gases. Also, note underground storage of any of the above. Please list the materials and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, if known. N/A 34) Will the proposed project involve the temporary or long -term use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials, including but not limited to those examples listed above? If yes, provide an inventory of all such materials to be used and proposed method of disposal. The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans. N/A 3 3/ I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate evaluation of this project to the best of my ability, that the facts, statements, and information presented are true acid correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. DATE: July 29, 1998 Signature LE.'Z-� William eil Title: City Engineer JOZ BACKGROUND City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II 1. Project File: Foothill- Hermosa Storm Drain and Traffic Signal Modification 2. Related Files: Storm Drain /Traffic Signal 3. Description of Project: Install storm drain system and modify traffic signal with intersection widening. 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 5. General Plan Designation: Community Commercial - North Commercial /Office - South 6. Zoning: C 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: Commercial /Office 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Joe Stofa, Associate Engineer (909) 477 -2750, extension 2340 10. Other agencies whose approval is required: CCWD SBCFCD -C--FJ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Foothill- Hermosa Storm Drain & Traffic Signal Modification Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. O Land Use and Planning (x) Transportation/Circulation O Public Services () Population and Housing () Biological Resources () Utilities and Service Systems () Geological Problems () Energy and Mineral Resources () Aesthetics () Water () Hazards (x) Cultural Resources (x) Air Quality () Noise ( ) Recreation () Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: (X) I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. () I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project, or agreed to, by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. () I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. () I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based upon the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. () I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. Signed: William J. O'Neil City Engineer July 29, 1998 3y Ll Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Foothill - Hermosa Storm Drain & Traffic Signal Modification Page 3 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Pursuantto Section 15063 ofthe California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, an explanation is required for all "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," and "Less Than Significant Impact" answers, including a discussion of ways to mitigate the significant effects identified. 1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity? d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community? Comments: a) b) C) d) O (X) O O O (X) O O O (x) Potentially Significant Impact Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Than Significant No Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity? d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community? Comments: a) b) C) d) O (X) O O O (X) O O O (x) 2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections? b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly (e.g., through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing? J-5 Potentially Significant Impact Less Potentially Unless Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections? b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly (e.g., through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing? J-5 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Foothill - Hermosa Storm Drain & Traffic Signal Modification Page 4 Comments: a) b) C) 3. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or Potentially people to potential impacts involving: a) Fault rupture? () Significant b) Seismic ground shaking? () Issues and Supporting Information Sources: c) Impact Less d) Seiche hazards? () Potentially Unless Than () () (X) f) significant Mitigation Significant No Impact () () (X) Impact IncorDorated Impact h) 3. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Fault rupture? () () () (X) b) Seismic ground shaking? () () () (X) c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? () () () (X) d) Seiche hazards? () () () (X) e) Landslides or mudflows? () () () (X) f) Erosion, changes in topography, or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? () () () (X) g) Subsidence of the land? () () () (X) h) Expansive soils? () () () (X) i) Unique geologic or physical features? () () () (X) Comments: a) b) C) d) e) fl g) h) i) 00P Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Foothill- Hermosa Storm Drain & Traffic Signal Modification Page 5 4. WATER. Will the proposal result in: Potentially Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate ' and amount of surface water runoff? () Significant b) Exposure of people or property to water related hazards Impact Less c) Issues and Supporting Information Sources. Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Into rated Impact Im act 4. WATER. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? () () (X) ( ) b) Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding? () () () (X) c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration of surface water quality (e.g., temperature, dissolved oxygen, or turbidity)? () () () W d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body? () () (X) () e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements? () () () (X) f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations, or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? () () () (X) g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? () () () (X) h) Impacts to groundwater quality? O O O (X) i) Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? () () () (X) Comments: a) Flows southward in Hermosa Ave. will be diverted eastward in the storm drain in Foothill Blvd. to Deer Creek Channel which is according to the City's Master Drainage Plan. b) C) d) Increase of flow into Deer Creek channel at Foothill Blvd which is where this flow is tabled according to the City's Master Drainage Plan. e) f) g) J/ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Foothill - Hermosa Storm Drain & Traffic Signal Modification Page 6 h) i) 5. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? () () () (X) b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? () () () (X) c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or cause any change in climate? () () () (X) d) Create objectionable odors? () () () (X) Comments: a) Some potential dust problems during construction only. Site will be maintained with water during construction. b) C) d) Potentially Significant Impact Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Unless Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 5. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? () () () (X) b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? () () () (X) c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or cause any change in climate? () () () (X) d) Create objectionable odors? () () () (X) Comments: a) Some potential dust problems during construction only. Site will be maintained with water during construction. b) C) d) - 6. TRANSPORTATION /CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? d) Insufficient parking capacity on -site or off -site? e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? O O (X) O O O O (X) O O O (X) O O O (X) FM Potentially significant Impact Los Potentially Unless Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact - 6. TRANSPORTATION /CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? d) Insufficient parking capacity on -site or off -site? e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? O O (X) O O O O (X) O O O (X) O O O (X) FM Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Foothill- Hermosa Storm Drain & Traffic Signal Modification Page 7 f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? O O O (x) g) Rail or air traffic impacts? () () () W Comments: a) Temporary detours for traffic along Foothill Blvd. will be required during construction. Proper signing and delineation will be used during the entire construction period b) C) d) e) f) g) Potentially • Significant Impact Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Than Significant No Issues and Supporting Information Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? O O O (x) g) Rail or air traffic impacts? () () () W Comments: a) Temporary detours for traffic along Foothill Blvd. will be required during construction. Proper signing and delineation will be used during the entire construction period b) C) d) e) f) g) 7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their habitats (including, but not limited to: plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds)? b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage trees, eucalyptus windrow, etc.)? c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g., eucalyptus grove, sage scrub habitat, etc.)? d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian and vernal pool)? e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? O O c) (X) M Potentially Significant Impact Less Potentially Unless Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their habitats (including, but not limited to: plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds)? b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage trees, eucalyptus windrow, etc.)? c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g., eucalyptus grove, sage scrub habitat, etc.)? d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian and vernal pool)? e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? O O c) (X) M Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Foothill- Hermosa Storm Drain & Traffic Signal Modification Page 8 Comments: a) b) C) d) e) 8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? b) Use non - renewable resources in a wasteful and inefficient manner? c) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? Comments: a) b) C) Potentially Significant Impact Las Issues and Supporting Information Sources; Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Than Significant No Issues and Supporting Information Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? b) Use non - renewable resources in a wasteful and inefficient manner? c) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? Comments: a) b) C) 9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)? b) Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? O O O (X) y0 Potentially Significant Impact Less Potentially Unless Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)? b) Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? O O O (X) y0 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Foothill- Hermosa Storm Drain & Traffic Signal Modification Page 9 c) The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? ( ) d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards? () e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable brush, grass, or trees? ( ) Comments: a) b) C) d) e) O O (X) �) O (X) O O (X) Potentially • Significant Impact Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Than Significant No Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Impact Incorporated Impact Impact c) The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? ( ) d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards? () e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable brush, grass, or trees? ( ) Comments: a) b) C) d) e) O O (X) �) O (X) O O (X) 10. NOISE. Will the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? Comments: a) b) O O O (X) Potentially Significant Impact Less Potentially Unless Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 10. NOISE. Will the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? Comments: a) b) O O O (X) 11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? q1 Potentially Significant Impact Less Pot Potentially Unlesa Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? q1 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Foothill- Hermosa Storm Drain & Traffic Signal Modification Page 10 b) Police protection? c) Schools? d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? e) Other governmental services? Comments: a) b) C) d) Temporary restriction of traffic flow during construction. e) O O O (X) () () () (X) () () (X) () () () () (X) Potentially substantial alterations to the following utilities: ' a) Power and natural gas? Significant Significant () () () (X) c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution Impact Less Impact Issues and Supporting Information Source Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Than Significant No Unless Impact Incorporated Impact Impact b) Police protection? c) Schools? d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? e) Other governmental services? Comments: a) b) C) d) Temporary restriction of traffic flow during construction. e) O O O (X) () () () (X) () () (X) () () () () (X) 12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the Potentially substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) Power and natural gas? () () () (X) Significant () () () (X) c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities? () () () (X) Impact Lesa e) Storm water drainage? () () () (X) f) Solid waste disposal? Potentially Unless Than Comments: Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No �a Impact Incorportited Impact Impact 12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) Power and natural gas? () () () (X) b) Communication systems? () () () (X) c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities? () () () (X) d) Sewer or septic tanks? () () () (X) e) Storm water drainage? () () () (X) f) Solid waste disposal? O O O (X) g) Local or regional water supplies? () () (X) ( ) Comments: a) b) �a Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Foothill- Hermosa Storm Drain & Traffic Signal Modification Page 11 C) d) e) f) g) Relocation of 10-inch waterline in Foothill Blvd and a 6 -inch waterline in Hermosa Ave. 13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? c) Create light or glare? Comments: a) b) C) c) c) c) (X) Potentially Significant Impact Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Than Significant No Impact incorporated Impact Impact 13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? c) Create light or glare? Comments: a) b) C) c) c) c) (X) 14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Disturb paleontological resources? b) Disturb archaeological resources? c) Affect historical or cultural resources? d) Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? Li3 Potentially Significant Impact Less blues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Disturb paleontological resources? b) Disturb archaeological resources? c) Affect historical or cultural resources? d) Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? Li3 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Foothill- Hermosa Storm Drain & Traffic Signal Modification Page 12 Comments: a) Removal of trees along south side of Foothill Blvd. will be required. Five - gallon replacement trees will be planted. b) Construction will be adjacent to historical "Mitchel' house. However, no plans to disturb the house are expected. (Ref: Historic Resources Inventory) C) d) e) 15. RECREATION. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities? () () () (X) b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? () () () (X) Comments: a) b) Potentially Significant Impact Less Potentially Unlew Than [sues and Supporting Information Sources. Significant Mitigation Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 15. RECREATION. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities? () () () (X) b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? () () () (X) Comments: a) b) 16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Potential to degrade: Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self - sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? () () () (X) yy Potentially Significant Impact Less Potentially Unless Than Imes and Supporting Information Sources. Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporined Impact Impact 16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Potential to degrade: Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self - sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? () () () (X) yy Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Foothill- Hermosa Storm Drain & Traffic Signal Modification Page 13 b) Short term: Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long -term, environmental goals? (A short -term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time. Long -term impacts will endure well into the future.) () () () (X) c) Cumulative: Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ( "Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) () () () (X) d) Substantial adverse: Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? O O O (X) Comments: a) b) C) d) EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply): () General Plan EIR (Certified April 6, 198 1) ( ) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) 1115 Potentially Significant Impact Less Potentially Unless Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact b) Short term: Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long -term, environmental goals? (A short -term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time. Long -term impacts will endure well into the future.) () () () (X) c) Cumulative: Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ( "Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) () () () (X) d) Substantial adverse: Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? O O O (X) Comments: a) b) C) d) EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply): () General Plan EIR (Certified April 6, 198 1) ( ) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) 1115 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Foothill- Hermosa Storm Drain & Traffic Signal Modification Page 14 {) Industrial Area Specific Plan EIR (Certified September 19, 1981) () Industrial Area Specific Plan, Subarea 18, EIR (SCH #93102055, certified June 15, 1994) () Victoria Planned Community EIR (Certified May 20, 198 1) () Terra Vista Planned Community EIR (SCH #81082808, certified February 16, 1983) () Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan EIR (SCH #87021615, certified September 16, 1987) () Etiwanda Specific Plan EIR (SCH 482061801, certified July 6, 1983) () Etiwanda North Specific Plan EIR (SCH 489012314, certified April 1, 1992) ( ) Other: ( ) Other: APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur. Signature: Date: July 29, 1998 Print Name and Title: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer 7W State of California — The Resources ,agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS ANO RECREATION HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY IDENTIFICATION Mitchell House 1. Common name: Ser. No. - HABS HAER Loc SHL No._ UTM1: A 11- 446380 - 3774860 C B D 2. Historic name: De Larsen House 3. Street or rural address: 10 211 Foothill Blvd. NR Status City Rancho Cucamonaa zip 91730 County San Bernardino 4. Parcel number: 208- 331 -07 5. Present Owner: Ellsworth P. & Harriett Mitchel Address: 1 0 1 1 Foothill Blvd- City Rancho Cucamonaa Zip 91730 Ownership is: Public _Private X 6. Present Use Residence Original use: Residence DESCRIPTION 7a. Architectural style: Craftsmand with influence I tal i anate 7b. Briefly describe the present physical appearance of the site or structure and describe any major alterations from its original condition: A two story rectangular structure of craftsman styling with Ital ianat influence. Roof is medium gable with red tile, exposed eaves and knee braces in :-able end. Siding is stucco. Windows are single rectangular pane with wood linter and sill. Windows on lower level have transoms with leaded glass. Front door is wood with leaded glass panel. A front arcade with roof sun deck and castelation is present, continuing around west side of structure. Multiple french windows open out onto second story deck. To east of structure are several single story structures that appear to be apartments. Buildings are gable roof with composite shingle, clapboard sidings and narrow windows and a simular age as main structure. A row of eucalyptis wind break is located on north side of property along boulevard. DPR 523 (Rev. 11/85) t B. Construction date: 1917 Estimated X Factual 9. Architect Unknown 10. Builder E. DeLarson 11. Approx. property size (in feet) Frontage 165 Depth 315 or approx. acreage. 12. Date(s) of enclosed photograph(s) July 1987 Y7 Condition: Excellent _Good X Fair Deteriorated No longer in existence 14. Alterations: None Aooarent 15. Surroundings: (Check more than one if necessary) Open land X Scattered buildings Densely built -up Residential Industrial Commercial X Other:: f 16. Threats to site: None known _Private development X Zoning Vandalism Public Works project Other: 17. Is the structure: On its original site? X Moved? Unknown? 18. Related features: Additional Out buiIdinQs SIGNIFICANCE 19. Briefly state historical and /or architectural importance (include dates, events, and persons associated with the site.) This is an example of a turn of the century vineyard house. Build by E. DeLarsen in 1918, the property is unique in the location of housing for the vineyard workers in close proximity to the main house. In most vineyards, housing for the workers was located some distance away from the owners home, usually back in the vineyards. DeLarsen owned the property from 1915 to 1927. It then was transfered through several different owners until 1943 when it was bought by the current owners, Ellsworth and Harriett Mitchell. The Mitchells have long been established within. the community. Ellsworth's father established Mitchell and Son Plumbing in 1938 in Upland and the business continues under Ellsworth's children. 20. Main theme of the historic resource: (If more than one is checked, number in order of importance.) Architecture x Arts & Leisure Economic /industrial x Exploration /Settlement Government Military Religion Social /Education 21. Sources (List books, documents, surveys, personal interviews and their dates). "A Field Guide to American Houses'% Virginia and Lee McAlester; San Beranrdino County Assissor Records; persor interview with Ada Cooper, November 4, 1987 22. Date form prepared NOypmhpr 1 Q87 By (name) Lynn Merrill Organization Address: City Zip Phone: Locational sketch map (draw and label site and surrounding streets, roads, and prominent landmarks): NORTH %00TH ItL_ �_Y-. J �1 • 6A ,i ER FILE HISTORIC RESOURCES DATA ENCODING SHEET .COTE: The numbers in parentheses indicate either the number of characters (letters, numbers, punctuation marks, spaces) that may be entered or the number of lines that may be checked. 1. Ser. No. 1730 — 33_ _ _ 10. Registration Status (1): City Zip (4) Form No. (1-4) Prop. No. (0-4) _1) listed — date (6) / / _4) may become eligible 2452 —2) determined eligible — _5) eligible local listing USGS Quad Map No. (4} year (2) _6) ineligible for above X 3) appears eligible ,7) undetermined 2. UTM Zone i 61 N h' (7 A 1-1 B C 3. Property Name: Common Name (30): Mitchell House Historic Name (40): DeLarsen House Parcel No, (0 -17) 208- 331 -07 4. Address: 11. Property Given Registration Status as (1): _1) part of district X 2) individual property —3) both of above 12. NR Class Category (1): 1) district — No. of properties (0 -3) _2) site X3) building _-4) structure `5) object 10211 Foothill Blvd. 13. Other Registration (0 -9) Number (0 -5} Street Name (4 -20) _1)Historic Am. Big. Survey X 6) Cal. Historical Landmark 2) Historic Am. Eng. Rec. X 7) County Pt of Hist Interest Nearest Cross Street (0-' 0) 3) National Hist Landmark-8) Local Listing _ Rancho Cucamonga _4) State Historic Park _9) County /Regional Park City/Town (3 -20) _5) other 91730 Vicinity of Zip code (5) City/Town 14, County 3 -1etter designator (3) StSD _ 11 unknown _2) sing. family prop. —3) mutt family prop. _4) ancillary big, —5) hotel /motel — 6) comm. big. 1 -3 st —7) comm. big, over 3 st. _ 8) industrial big. _ 9) public utility big. —10) theatre _11) engineering struct. _12) civic auditorium _13) cmnty cntr /soc. hall _14) government big. _15) educational big. _16) religious big. —17) R/R depot —18) train 19) bridge — 90) canal /aqueduct —21) dam Property Attributes: 5. Type of Ownership (1 -7): _1) unknown _ 2) federal _ 3) state 6. Present Use (1 -6): _1) unknown _2) commercial X 3) residential X4) private 5) county 6) city 7) special district 4) private non-comm. _ 5) public 6) none 7. Year of Initial Construction: Individual Property (4) 1917 District (8) — 8. Architect(s) (0 -25): Unknown Bui Ider(s) (0 -25) : Unknown 9. Year of Survey (2): 87 DPR 660 (Rev. 12/83) 15. Architectural Plans and Specifications: —72) lake /river /reservoir —73) ship —24) lighthouse —25) amusement park _26) monument /mural /gravestone _27) folk art _28) street fumiture _29) landscape architr. _30) trees /vegetation --31) urban open space _32) rural open space X 33) farm /ranch —34) military property _35) CCC/WPA structure _36) ethnic minority property ethnic group (5 -20) —37) highway /trail _38) women's property 40) cemetery _39) other Yes X No EVA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 2, 1998 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Dave Blevins, Public Works Maintenance Manager SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BUCKNAM AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED, TO PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR ANALYSIS OF MAINTENANCE SERVICES PROCESSES, IN THE AMOUNT OF $27,170 ($24,000 PLUS 10% CONTINGENCY) TO BE FUNDED FROM FUND 01- 4647 -6028 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve, award and execute the subject Professional Services Agreement with Bucknam & Associates, to provide professional services for analysis of maintenance services process, in the amount of $27,170 ($24,000 plus 10% Contingency) to be funded from fund 01- 4647 -6028. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS Last fiscal year the Engineering Division conducted a re- engineering study of the division designed to evaluate the way we do business and implement well thought out changes. That plan was successful and the change process was implemented and is continuing. This fiscal year, phase II of the process was budgeted to take a critical look at our Public Works operation. Staff is recommending award and execution of the professional services agreement with Bucknam and Associates, who were instrumental in the very successful evaluation of the Engineering Division, to do the same with Public Works. The project is funded in the current fiscal year budget in account 01- 4647 -6028. Respectfully submitted, 9r, ,, 52 C/ / �, � /�, W m J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:DB:ju Ci I—y' 01 R,,AACIf() Ci.i'.\\1 1�( STAFF REPORT DATE: September 2, 1998 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Jerry A. Dyer, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH L. D. KING, INC., TO PROVIDE TOPOGRAPHICAL DESIGN SURVEY FOR PROPOSED STREET IMPROVEMENTS FOR NINE DIFFERENT LOCATIONS (See Vicinity Map) THROUGHOUT THE CITY, TO BE FUNDED FROM THE FOLLOWING ACCOUNT NOS.: 10 -4637 -9805 SUMMIT ($2,079), 10- 4637 -9803 4TH ST. ($4,893), 10- 4637 -95 18 BERYL ($4,257),10-4637-9807 ARROW ($3,53 I ), 10- 4637 -9808 HAVEN - LEMON TO WILSON ($4,257), 10- 4637 -9809 CHURCH ($4,257), 10- 4637- 9810HELLMAN($ 1,067), 10- 4637 -9812 AMETHYST ($8,833), 32 -4637 -9703 HAVEN W/S BASE LINE TO 19TH ($4,983) RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the Professional Services Agreement and an additional 10% conting-yencv with L.D. King Inc., to provide topographical design survey for proposed street improvements for nine different locations throughout the City, and authorize the Mayor to si,n said agreement and the Citv Clerk to attest thereto. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS: Requests for proposals to provide topographical design survey for various locations throughout the City were sent to five engineering consulting firms. All five firms are on the City's pre - qualified list for providing survey services. Three firms responded (L.D. King, Inc., Wagner Pacific, Inc., and Derbish, Guerra and Associates). L.D. King's proposal met all of the City's requirements at the lowest cost. L.D. King's proposal is $34,770.00 and staff is requesting a 10% contingency for a total of $38,247.00 to be funded from the following account numbers: 10- 4637 -9805 Summit ($2,079), 10- 4637 -9803 4 "' St. ($4,893), 10- 4637 -9518 Beryl ($4,257). 10- 4637 -9807 Arrow ($3,531). 10 -4637 -9808 Haven - Lemon to Wilson ($4,257), 10 -4637 -9809 Church ($4,257), 10- 4637 -9810 Hellman ($1,067), 10- 4637 -9812 Amethyst ($8,833), 32- 4637 -9703 Haven W/s Base Line to 19 "' ($4,983). Res $ctfully submitted, Wi J. O'Neil Citv Engineer WJO:JAD Attachments S/ VICINITY MAP 1 i ' r- FONTANA , � •K 4. a n � ,vaa. ava By La �p CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MAP OF - PROJECT LIMITS o ONTARIO LEGEND 1 Summit Ave - East to E/o Summit School 2 41' St. - Utica to Pittsburgh 3 Beryl St. - Base Line to 19'x' 4 Arrow Rte - Grove to Baker 5 Haven Ave - Lemon to Wilson 6 Church St. - Archibald to Center 7 Hellman Ave - N/o Arrow 8 Amethyst Ave - Highland to N. City Limits 9 Haven Ave - Base Line to 19'x' VICINITY MAP TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY VARIOUS LOCATIONS xrs. X2 CITY OF RIANCTIO (ITCANTONC-A STAFF REPORT DATE: September 2, 1998 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Robert Zetterberg, Integrated Waste Coordinator SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF THE COLLECTION CENTER HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO SERVICE AREA 70 CONSOLIDATED FIRE DISTRICT (CSA 70 CFD) RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the Household Hazardous Waste Agreement with Collection Center with the San Bernardino County Fire Department Household Hazardous Waste Division. BACKGROUND The California Public Resources Code requires Cities and Counties to prepare a Household Hazardous Waste Element (HHWE) to identify the safe collection, recycling, treatment and disposal of hazardous waste generated by households and separated from the waste stream. In accordance with the Resources Code requirements the City of Rancho Cucamonga has established a HEW Facility at 1218 Base Line Road, operated by the Engineering/Integrated Waste Management Division and contracting with the County of San Bernardino Fire Department Household Hazardous Waste Division, to train City staff and manage the safe removal of hazardous waste. ANALYSIS The City of Rancho Cucamonga has operated a HHW Facility since 1987 and has contracted with the County of San Bernardino to properly dispose of the hazardous waste. In Fiscal Year 1997/98, the City took in over 25 1,385 pounds of various HHW from over 3,810 participants. Each year the County provides 24 -hours of training for any new staff working at the facility and a 8 -hour refresher training course for current staff. The training keeps staff up to date on any legal changes passed by the Environmental Protection Agency and tests staffs' knowledge on the proper operation of the HHW Facility. S13 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT September 2, 1998 Page 2 In addition to the normal Saturday operation the County also provides support for the City's Annual Clean Sweep and BOP (battery, oil and paint) event held in April of each year which generates an additional 47,400 pounds of recyclable household hazardous waste. The San Bernardino County Fire Department Household Hazardous Waste Division (Division) and each City in the County has developed a county -wide cooperative program for the management of Household Hazardous Waste. The Division is responsible for the safe management of hazardous waste in accordance with adopted H1-1W Elements as part of AB 939. The City's desires for the protection, health and welfare of the public and its personnel, the removal of hazardous waste from homes so that such materials will pose no danger in the event of fire.. This agreement is in consideration of mutual covenants and conditions of all parties involved. The City of Rancho Cucamonga agrees to operate a HHW Facility at 12158 Base Line Road, open every Saturday from 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. in accordance with the Divisions' established procedures. Furthermore, the designated and trained employees will label, categorize and pack the waste in accordance with Division Requirements. The waste will be stored in their original containers (except used motor oil and antifreeze) and placed in the provided containers inside the waste storage area located within the fenced area of the facility. The City shall be responsible for the maintenance of the facility, the safety of persons and materials on the property, publicize to its residents the need to properly recycle, reduce, store, transport and dispose of Household Hazardous Waste. In consideration for the services provided, the city shall pay the Division quarterly payments on an amount calculated based on the 1997/98 State of California Department of Finance population at a rate of 5.080 per person. This agreement shall be effective until June 30, 1999, unless otherwise terminated or amended. This agreement has been reviewed and approved by the City Attorney, Engineering/Integrated Waste Management and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:RZ:dlw Attachments I:ASTAFFRPT,HH WFacility.wpd 4-y STAFF REPORT DATE September 2, 1998 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council ,Tack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Jr. Engineer OW SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR PARCEL MAP 1012, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOURTH STREET, BETWEEN BUFFALO AVENUE AND I -15, SUBMITTED BY OLTMANS INVESTMENT COMPANY RECONIMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreement and security extension and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS: Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Parcel Map 15012 were approved by the City Council on .June 18, 1997, as follows: Faithful Performance Bond No. 3SM 908 919 00 in the amount of S275,000.00 The developer, Oltmans Investment Company, is requesting approval of a 12 -month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement and Securities Extension are available in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted ��, iam J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:LRB:ls S-5 EXHIBIT q d S&W MAR1r40 DR vE t � FARO L 1 I P�ftcEC 2 `� r s K w 4 lu 5 f2EE."t CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO emarr "A„ STATE OF CALIFORNIA P,M. 15412 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA., CALIFORNIA. APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR PARCEL MAP 1 5012 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on September 2, 1998, by Oltmans Investment Company. as developer. for the improvement of public right -of -way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein. and generally located on the north side of Fourth Street, between Buffalo Avenue and I -1 5. WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements. described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Parcel Map 15012; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW. THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. and the City Clerk to attest thereto. S! C1 -Y OF R 1NCIfo Ci'C:�llt?Nt;'r:� STAFF REPORT DATE: September 2, 1995 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP. City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Linda R. Beek, Jr. Engineer 17&' SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR TRACT 13835, LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHLAND AND ROCHESTER, SUBMITTED BY SHEFFIELD HOMES L.L.C. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreement and security extension and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS: Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities to ; EXHIBIT 'A' h' /Gh'LA1�0+ A VENUE I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO r,PAC r �383� STATE OF CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 1383 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on September 2, 1998, by Sheffield Homes, L.L.C. as developer, for the improvement of public right -of -way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the northeast corner of Highland and Rochester. WHEREAS.. the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Tract 1383; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW. THEREFORE. the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said l nprovement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Ntayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the Citv of Rancho Cucamonua, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. AO STAFF REPORT DATE: September 2, 1998 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Linda R. Beek, Jr. Engineer SUBJECT: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND, ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 95 -02, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF JERSEY BOULEVARD, EAST OF WHITE OAK AVENUE RECOMMENDATION: The required improvements for DR 95 -02, have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to accept a Maintenance Bond and release the Faithful Performance Bond. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS: As a condition of approval of completion of DR 95-02, located on the south side of Jersey Boulevard, east of White Oak Avenue, the applicant was required to complete street improvements. It is recommended that City Council release the existing Faithful Performance Bond and accept the Maintenance Bond. Developer: Mr. Ralph Karubian 1801 South Mountain Avenue Monrovia, CA 91016 Release: Faithful Performance Bond 3SM 911 926 00 $154,400.00 Accept: Maintenance Bond 3SM 911 926 00 $ 1,440.00 Respectfully submitted, Wil iamj O'Neil Citv Engineer WJO:LRB:ls 4O EXHIBIT "A' Lu,-- ii I --JERSEY BOULE�ARD it ,x CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA DR 95-02 RESOLUTION NO. 93"1S6 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 95-02. AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for DR 95-02, have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the wort: is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. o�3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 2, 1998 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Alan Warren, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND AMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT 15727 GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES - An amendment to Tentative Tract 15727 for the purpose of developing a gated residential community with private streets of 342 single family lots and a 5 -acre public neighborhood park on a total of 82 acres of land in the Low - Medium Residential District (4 -8 dwelling units per acre), on the north side of Fourth Street, west of Archibald Avenue, and bordered by Sixth Street on the north. An Environmental Impact Report was certified to Tentative Tract 15727 and staff has concluded that no additional impacts will result from the development of the amended map and that no additional environmental review is required. APN: 210- 062 -02, 11, 13, 17, 18, 19, 26, 32, and 33. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission is scheduled to review the subject application on August 31, 1998. If the Planning Commission recommends approval, it would be appropriate forthe City Council to approve the subject application and issue a Negative Declaration. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS The applicant is requesting that Tentative Tract 15727, which was approved in November 1996, be amended to allow for the development to become a private, gated community. Staff has determined that an amended tentative tract is required to establish the authority for final maps to include private streets. The Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the project covered multiple applications (general plan amendment, zone changes, etc.) including the tentative tract map. As a result, the tentative tract was part of the application package approved by the City Council. Therefore, the amended map is also being brought to the City Council for final action. The 82 -acre site lies at the juncture of the Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Channel and Fourth Street and is bordered on the north by Sixth Street. The only changes to the tract as a result of this application will be the private ownership of the interior streets, construction of vehicle and pedestrian gates on the central spine street near its intersections with Fourth and Sixth Streets, and the shifting of street landscaping maintenance from the City to the Homeowners' Association. The interior street layout and the numbers of lots and houses remains the same as previously approved. �v CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT AMEND. TT 15727 - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES September 2, 1998 Page 2 On August 31, 1998, the Planning Commission is scheduled to review the application and the private street concept and gate designs through a related application, Design Review 98 -16. Please refer to the attached Planning Commission reports for specific issues and conclusions. FACTS FOR FINDING The recommended Facts for Finding are listed in the attached Planning Commission report dated August 31, 1998. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT The Initial Study, Part II, is included with this report. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration based on the certification of the original EIR and that no additional significant impacts are anticipated with the addition of private, gated streets. CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300 -foot radius of the project site. Staff has received requests from the State Department of Transportation and the South Coast Air Quality Management District for copies of the Negative Declaration. ACTION If the Planning Commission recommends approval and the City Council concurs with the recommendation, it would be appropriate to approve Amended Tentative Tract 15727 by the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:AW:jfs Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Planning Commission Staff Reports for Amended Tentative Tract 15727 and Development Review 98 -16 dated August 31, 1998 Resolution of Approval with Conditions 6s STAFF REPORT DATE: August 31, 1998 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Alan Warren, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND AMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT 15727 - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES - An amendment to Tentative Tract 15727 for the purpose of developing a gated residential community with private streets of 342 single family lots and a 5 -acre public neighborhood park on a total of 82 acres of land in the Low - Medium Residential District (4 -8 dwelling units per acre),on the north side of Fourth Street, west of Archibald Avenue, and bordered by Sixth Street on the north. An Environmental Impact Report was certified for Tentative Tract 15727 and staff has concluded that no additional impacts will result from the development of the amended map and that no additional environmental review is required. APN: 210- 062 -02, 11, 13, 17, 18, 19, 26, 32, and 33. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Single family residential tract; Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - Drainage facilities, vacant, and apartments; City of Ontario - Open Space, Single - Family Residential (5.1 -11 dwelling units per acre), and Multi - Family Residential (11 -16 dwelling units per acre) East - Single family residences and vineyards; Industrial Area Specific Plan, Subarea 16 (Industrial Park) West - Single family residence and vacant land; Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre); City of Ontario - Limited Industrial B. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) North - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - City of Ontario - Proposed Recreation /Open Space /Park, Low - Medium Residential (5.1 -11 dwelling units per acre), and Medium Residential (11 -16 dwelling units per acre) East - Industrial Park West - Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre), City of Ontario - General Industrial C. Site Characteristics: The project site gently slopes southward at less than 2 percent gradient. The site has been graded and construction has started on the first two phases. k -� 61 + \'�. / / �a � PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT AMEND. TO TT 15727 - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES August 31, 1998 Page 2 ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant is requesting that Tentative Tract 15727, which was approved in November 1996, be amended to allow for the development to become a private, gated community. Development Code Section 17.08.040.0.3 requires private streets be approved by the Planning Commission. The 82 -acre site lies at the juncture of the Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Channel and Fourth Street and is bordered on the north by Sixth Street. The main focus of staffs review is the "retro fitting" of gated community standards on a residential project that was not designed as a private community. The two Golden Oak Road entries are proposed to have entry and exit gates. The main entry is to be off Fourth Street and includes a guard house (with porte cochere) in addition to the remote control operated gate system. The secondary access is off Sixth Street and has only a remote control gate. B. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee reviewed the design issues of the Amended Tentative Tract under Design Review 98 -16 application. The location of the north and south gates are accommodated in the expansion of the Golden Oak Road entries as indicated on the Amended Tentative Tract. The Committee recommended approval of the design of the gates on August 4, 1998. C. Technical Review Committee: The technical issues focused on the Amended Tentative Tract process. The conditions reflect the recommended changes to the responsibility of infrastructure maintenance. With the privatization of the streets, all infrastructure maintenance (streets, storm drains, street landscaping, etc.) within the gates is transferred to the Homeowners' Association (HOA) through the Covenants, Conditions, & Restrictions (CC&Rs). In addition, provisions are included for emergency access by Fire and Police services and for school bus access, again via the HOA and CC&Rs. Rather than amending the original tentative tract resolution, a completely new resolution has been drafted that incorporates all of the original conditions (amended as needed) along with new conditions that specifically address the private community issues. D. Environmental Assessment: The site was rezoned early in 1997 to Low - Medium Residential and an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was completed to assess impacts of the land use change and the residential development potential. The EIR addressed all significant impacts of Tentative Tract 15727 and the installation of private community gates with the amended map will not result in any additional significant impacts. A Negative Declaration is recommended. FACTS FOR FINDING: The Planning Commission must make the following findings in order to approve this application: A. That the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and B. That the design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and C. That the site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and M., PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT AMEND. TO TT 15727 - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES August 31, 1998 Page 3 D. That the design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans or wildlife or their habitat; and E. That the tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and F. That the design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision; and G. That the application would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and an Environmental Impact Report has been prepared and certified by the City Council by separate Resolution. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300 -foot radius of the project site. Staff has received requests from the State Department of Transportation and the South Coast Air Quality Management District for copies of the Negative Declaration. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend approval of Amended Tentative Tract 15727 through adoption of the attached Resolution Recommending Approval with Conditions and recommend adoption of a Negative Declaration by the City Council. Respectfully submitted, �r i Brad Buller City Planner BB:AW /jfs Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Amended Tentative Tract 15727 Map Exhibit "B" - Initial Study, Part II Resolution Recommending Approval with Conditions I'm OL 5 i3 170 i 2 e. - — — - — — — — — - — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -- CZl — — — - - - --- — — — ------ -------- ---- - - ---- — — -- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -- L a L-j , 41, 1 a. ;I; Al Jt' F 1 4 I J., E "T, t z T--� ti T ., P rr IL - Exhibit "A" BACKGROUND City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II 1. Project File: Amended Tentative Tract 15727 2. Related Files: Tentative Tract 15727, GPA 95 -03A, ISPA 95 -04, DDA 95 -02 3. Description of Project: An amendment to Tentative Tract 15727 for the purpose of developing a gated residential communitywith private streets of 342 single family lots and a 5 -acre public neighborhood park on a total of 82 acres of land in the Low - Medium Residential District (4 -8 dwelling units per acre), on the north side of Fourth Street, west of Archibald Avenue and bordered by Sixth Street on the north. An Environmental Impact Report was certified for Tentative Tract 15727 and staff has concluded that no additional impacts will result from the development of the amended map and that no additional environmental review is required. A Negative Declaration for the amended tentative tract will be prepared. APN: 210- 062 -02, 11, 13, 17, 18, 19, 26, 32, and 33. 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Griffin Industries 24005 Ventura Boulevard Calabasas, CA 91302 5. General Plan Designation: Low to Medium (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) 6. Zoning: Low to Medium (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The project is surrounded by single family residential homes, an Industrial Park and Industrial. 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: (909) 477 -2750 Alan Warren 10. Other agencies whose approval is required: None Exhibit "B" 76 Initial Study for of Rancho Cucamonga Amended Tentative Tract 15727 Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. (x) Land Use and Planning (x ) Transportation /Circulation (x) Public Services () Population and Housing () Biological Resources () Utilities and Service Systems () Geological Problems () Energy and Mineral Resources () Aesthetics (x) Water () Hazards (x) Cultural Resources (x) Air Quality (x) Noise ( ) Recreation ( ) Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: () I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. () I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project, or agreed to, by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. () I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. () I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based upon the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. (X) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. Refer to "Rancho Cucamonga Industrial Area Specific Plan, Subarea 16, Redesignation Signed: EIR" ::: d No ember 20, 1996. Alan Warren Associate Planner August 4, 1998 —it Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Amended Tentative Tract 15727 Page 3 EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply): () General Plan EIR (Certified April 6, 1981) () Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) (} Industrial Area Specific Plan EIR (Certified September 19, 1981) () Industrial Area Specific Plan, Subarea 18, EIR (SCH #93102055, certified June 15, 1994) () Victoria Planned Community EIR (Certified May 20, 1981) () Terra Vista Planned Community EIR (SCH #81082808, certified February 16, 1983) () Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan EIR (SCH #87021615, certified September 16, 1987) (} Etiwanda Specific Plan EIR (SCH #82061801, certified July 6, 1983) () Etiwanda North Specific Plan EIR (SCH #89012314, certified April 1, 1992) (X) Other: Rancho C'uramnnna Inrlumtrial Area peclfic Plan, Subarea 16. Redesignation EIR (SCH# 95112019, certified November 20, 1996) () Other: 7a 08/20/1998 09:30 818 -591 -9087 x iFFIr+ Iraq —. a SENT 9Y: R CUCAMONGA COCA GEV; 8 -19 -9e 9:51AM; 909:772847 -> 1 818 591 0087; #5l5 initial Study for .l of Rancho Cucamonga Amended Tentative Tract 15727 Pao.. 4 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the project plans or proposals and /or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no signlflcant environmental effects would occu- '73 City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: Amended Tentative Public Review Period Closes: September 2, 1998 Tract 15727 Project Name: Project Applicant: Griffin Industries Project Location (also see attached map): Located on the north side of Fourth Street, west of Archibald Avenue and bordered by Sixth Street on the north - APN: 210- 062 -02, 11, 13, 17, 18, 19, 26, 32, and 33. Project Description: An amendment to Tentative Tract 15727 for the purpose of developing a gated residential community with private streets of 342 single family lots and a 5 -acre public neighborhood park on a total of 82 acres of land in the Low - Medium Residential District (4 -8 dwelling units per acre). . FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: 13 The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. ® The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but: (1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project as revised may have a significant effect on the environment. If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477 -2750 or Fax (909) 477 -2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period. September 2, 1998 Date of Determination Adopted By 7/ 1-i i r ur Ac iNt.nv k.- uk 1-k1V1v1NU1-k STAFF REPORT DATE: August 31, 1998 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Alan Warren, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 98 -16 FOR AMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT 15727 - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES - The review of a guard house, gates, and private roadway improvements for Amended Tentative Tract 15727 on a total of 82 acres of land in the Low - Medium Residential District (4 -8 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side of Fourth Street, west of Archibald Avenue, and bordered by Sixth Street on the north - APN: 210- 062 -02, 11, 13, 17, 18, 19, 26, 32, and 33. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Single family residential tract; Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - Drainage facilities, vacant, and apartments; City of Ontario - Open Space, Single - Family Residential (5.1 -11 dwelling units per acre), and Multi - Family Residential (11 -16 dwelling units per acre) East - Single family residences and vineyards; Industrial Area Specific Plan, Subarea 16 (Industrial Park) West - Single family residence and vacant land; Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre); City of Ontario - Limited Industrial B. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) North - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - City of Ontario - Proposed Recreation /Open Space /Park, Low - Medium Residential (5.1 -11 dwelling units per acre), and Medium Residential (11 -16 dwelling units per acre) East - Industrial Park West - Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre), City of Ontario - General Industrial C. Site Characteristics: The project site gently slopes southward at less than 2 percent gradient. The site has been graded and construction has started on the first two phases. 75 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 98 -16 FOR TT 15727 - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES August 31, 1998 Page 2 ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant is requesting that Tentative Tract 15727, which was approved in November 1996, be amended to allow for the development to become a private, gated community. Development Code Section 17.08.040.0.3 requires private streets be approved by the Planning Commission. The 82 -acre site lies at the juncture of the Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Channel and Fourth Street and is bordered on the north by Sixth Street. The main focus of staffs design review is the "retro fitting" of gated community standards on a residential project that was not designed as a private community. The two Golden Oak Road entries are proposed to have entry and exit gates. The main entry is to be off Fourth Street and includes a guard house (with porte cochere) with a remote control operated gate system. A secondary access is off Sixth Street and has only a remote control gate. The Planning Commission will be separately considering the Amended Tentative Tract 15727 under the public hearing portion of the meeting. B. Design Review Committee: The design, materials, and colors of the gates and the guard house were approved by the Committee (Macias, McNiel, Fong) on August 4, 1998 (Exhibit "A "), with the following changes: The north gate is approved as shown in the amended design submitted to the Design Review Committee on August 4, 1998. 2. One call /card box is required per entry lane (two at the Fourth Street gate and one at the Sixth Street gate). 3. The landscaping along Fourth Street and Golden Oak Road shall be installed as shown on approved plans on file with the Engineering Division. Reductions in the amount of cobblestone hardscape and increases in the amount of plant material may be considered and approved by the City Engineer and City Planner, at their discretion, while maintaining the general landscaping /hardscape design concept. 4. The gate house and gate elevations and design /materials were approved as submitted. Native river rock, as used on the existing wall pilasters, was approved for use on the gate house. C. Technical Review Committee: The technical issues focused on the Amended Tentative Tract process. The conditions reflect the recommended changes to the responsibility of infrastructure maintenance. With the privatization of the streets, all infrastructure maintenance (streets, storm drains, street landscaping, etc.) within the gates is transferred to the Homeowners' Association (HOA) through the Covenants, Conditions, & Restrictions (CC &Rs). In addition, provisions are included for emergency access by Fire and Police services and for school bus access, again via the HOA and CC &Rs. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 98 -16 FOR TT 15727 - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES August 31, 1998 Page 3 FACTS FOR FINDING: The Commission must make all of the following findings in order to approve this application: A. That the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and B. That the design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and C. That the site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and D. That the design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans or wildlife or their habitat; and E. That the tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and F. That the design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision; and G. This application would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and an Environmental Impact Report has been prepared and certified by the City Council by separate Resolution. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve Design Review 98 -16 through adoption of the attached Resolution. Respectfulllysubmitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:AW:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" Exhibit "B" Exhibit "C" Exhibit "D" Exhibit "E" Exhibit "F" Exhibit "G" Resolution - Design Review Committee Action Comments dated August 4, 1998 - Gated Entry Plan - Fourth & Sixth Streets Entry Plans - Fourth & Sixth Streets Conceptual Landscape Plans - Fourth & Sixth Streets Illustrative Landscape Plans - Fourth Street Gate Elevation Illustrative Landscape Plans - Fourth Street Guard House Front Elevation of Approval 77 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Alan Warren August 4,1998 DESIGN REVIEW 98 -16 FOR AMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT 15727 - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES - The review of a guard house, gates, and private roadway improvements for Amended Tentative Tract 15727 on a total of 82 acres of land, located in the Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) District, at the intersection of Fourth Street and the Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Channel and bordered by Sixth Street on the north. APN: 210- 062 -02, 11, 13, 17, 18, 19, 26, 32, and 33. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND AMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT 15727 - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES - An amendment to Tentative Tract 15727 for the purpose of developing a gated residential community of 342 single family lots and a 5 -acre public neighborhood park on a total of 82 acres of land in the Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) District, at the intersection of Fourth Street and the Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Channel and bordered by Sixth Street on the north. An Environmental Impact Report was certified for Tentative Tract 15727. APN:210- 062 -02, 11, 13, 17, 18, 19, 26, 32, and 33. Desian Parameters The applicant is requesting that Tentative Tract 15727, which was approved in November of 1996, be amended to allow for the development to become a private, gated community. Development Code Section 17.08.040.0.3 requires private streets to be approved by the Planning Commission. Since the Design Review Committee reviewed the tract design and made recommendations to the Planning Commission, it is appropriate that the committee review the gated community proposal. The main focus of staff's review is the "retro fitting" of gated community standards on a residential project that was not designed as a private community. Conceptually, staff does not have a concern with this project becoming a "gated community." The main entry is to be off Fourth Street and includes a Guard House (with porte cochere) in addition to the code /card operated gate system. The secondary access is off Sixth Street and has only a code /card gate. The 82 -acre site lies at the juncture of the Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Channel and Fourth Street, and is bordered on the north by Sixth Street. The project site gently slopes southward at less than 2 percent gradient and has been rough graded and construction started on Phases 1 and 2. Early in 1997, the site was rezoned to Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) and an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was completed to assess impacts of the land use change and the residential development potential. The EIR addressed all significant impacts of the tentative tract and the installation of private, community gates will not result in any additional significant impacts. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Major Issues: The following issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project The proposed gate designs are modifications to the City's design standards for gated communities. The main entry off Fourth Street does appear to accommodate large moving vans, furniture trucks, school buses and fire equipment around the porte cochere. The orientation of the call box (facing which aisle) is not shown. Staff recommends that a call /card box be provided for each vehicle entry as provided in the Residential Design Guidelines. Resident entry is to be via radio controlled devices (similar to garage door openers). Exhibit "A" -78 DRC COMMENTS DR 98 -16 & TT15727 August 4, 1998 Page 2 2. The gate off Sixth Street has a 20 -foot wide entry drive aisle and a 14 -foot wide exit aisle. The Fire District regulations call for each aisle to be at least 20 feet wide. Widening the aisle to the east would result in a three -foot planting area behind the curb adjacent sidewalk. To satisfy the aisle width standard, staff suggests that the applicant consider moving the gate area southerly and use some of Lot 196 (Lot 1 on the Site Plan /Grading Plan) to widen the exit drive aisle. The proposal to bring the curb within 1 foot of the west property line works with existing grades at the north end of the area to be widened, but in the gate location, at least 3 feet is needed to daylight a 2:1 slope at the property line. In the same area, the plans show mechanical gate opening devices on both sides of the exiting aisle, but only one along the entry aisle. If an opening device is needed on the west side of Golden Oak Road, sufficient area between the curb line and the adjoining west property line is available for its placement. Again additional area may be acquired from Lot 196. The applicant has been advised of these concerns and may have solutions ready for the committee's consideration at the meeting. Also, the Sixth Street gate does not have a separate visitor lane. Staff recommends that this gate have a sign identifying it as a resident only (no visitors or delivery) entrance. Sign should be subject to the Sign Ordinance regulations and City Planner approval. 3. The tentative tract map shows a potential residential circulation plan for the adjoining northwestern properties. One street joins Golden Oak Road just north of the northern gates. No other street joins up with the tract's street system although Old Post Drive stubs at the western boundary. This street is intended, under the existing tentative map, to join up with a street in the future residential development to the west. The southern most cul -de -sac in the future plan scales out to 600 feet in length which satisfies the maximum City Standard and Old Post Road is not extended into the future plan. The City may, however, wish to preserve emergency access and drainage easements to Old Post Drive, to allow flexibility for future development here. Staff recommends that the amended tentative tract provide emergency access and drainage easement agreements for the adjacent property at this point. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: 1. All drainage easements along the northern property lines should not be granted to the City (as listed on the Amended Tentative Tract) but to the adjacent property owners. 2. The applicant states that school bus access will be made available to the community via the same method as provided for police and fire services. In addition, a bus stop will be provided at the northeast corner of Golden Oak Road and Brook Drive. This feature will be identified with a bus stop sign and paving between the adjacent side walk and curb line. Staff believes these are acceptable provisions for the school bus issue. Approval of the plan should be conditioned in the CC &R's to provide bus access into the community for the school district(s). The gates and cul -de -sac fencing (at Glenaire and Springbrook Courts) are to be tubular steel and finished in a dark, forest green color. Staff believes this design will present attractive gate entries and recommends that the gate /fence color be non - glossy. The gates and fences should not exceed 6 feet in height (above grade), but may extend to the height of the stone columns (no higher than 8 feet) as a design feature as shown on the main Fourth Street entry. 79 DRC COMMENTS DR 98 -16 & TT15727 August 4, 1998 Page 3 4. The guard house is designed with stucco and a cobblestone base. Staff recommends that the structure be finished with a native fieldstone base and with colors and materials previously approved for the tract phases, subject to approval by the City Planner. 5. The illustrative landscape plans for the gate areas appear appropriate. Final design will be coordinated with the approved landscape plans for Fourth Street and Golden Oak Road and subject to City Engineer and City Planner approval. 6. All conditions of the approved tentative tract map shall apply to the amended map, by reference, in addition to those conditions required for these applications by the Design Review Committee, Planning Commission, and City Council. The final tracts will be required to join all districts, including the landscape maintenance district, as required by TT 15727. The installation, and acceptance by the City, of a public, 5 -acre park, with all standard neighborhood park facilities (as presently provided for with public improvement bonds), prior to the occupancy of 30 percent of the units or prior to building permit issuance of 70 percent of the units, whichever occurs first is also required. The public park is not to be included within the private, gated community. 7. The card /code access system shall be in compliance with Fire District and Police (Sheriff) Department requirements. The Fire and Police Departments will be provided with the necessary equipment to gain emergency access into the community. Staff Recommendation: With the exception of the north gate configuration, staff believes that the gated community proposal is acceptable for approval. If the applicant is able to provide, at the meeting, an acceptable solution to the north gate design issues, staff would recommend that the amended tentative tract, private community plan, and gate facilities be approved subject to the conditions contained in this report and final City Engineer, City Planner, and Fire Chief approval. If, however, an acceptable solution is not evident, then staff recommends that the item be continue to the next meeting to give the applicant time to develop an improved design. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Rich Macias, Larry McNiel, Nancy Fong Staff Planner: Alan Warren Of the items discussed n the staff comments, the applicant agreed to include in the project the following numbered items listed in this report, as conditions of approval: Major Issues - Secondary Issues - Items 2 and 3 per applicant's letter dated August 3, 1998. Applicant requested Item 1 to be reduced to one call /card box. The Committee decided that as this item is a Planning Commission policy, it is more appropriate for the full Commission to consider any changes. This item remains as a condition, but the applicant was advised to bring the issue up at the Planning Commission hearing. No. 1 as listed in the Design the applicant applies only to properties to the north. Review Committee comments and explained to the drainage easements from the neighboring �W'r DRC COMMENTS DR 98 -16 & TT15727 August 4, 1998 Page 4 Items 2, 5, and 7 per applicant's letter dated August 3, 1998. Item 3 the sample gate material and color, dark green, baked glossy finish, was acceptable. Item 6 related to the Landscaping Plan along Golden Oak Drive and fourth Street. The applicant wishes to change the amount of "hardscape- cobble" in the landscaped area due to the fact that they are willing to have the Homeowners' Association take over the maintenance. The Committee stated that a reduction in the amount of hardscape would be acceptable with a comprise amount worked out with staff. The Committee recommended approval with the following conditions: The north gate is approved per the amended design submitted to the Committee on August 4, 1998. 2. One call /card box is required per entry lane (two at the Fourth Street gate, one at the Sixth Street gate). 3. The landscaping along Fourth Street and golden Oak Drive shall be installed as shown on approved plans on file with the Engineering Division. Reductions in the amount of cobblestone hardscape and increases in the amount of plant material may be considered and approved by the City Engineer and City Planner, at their discretion, while maintaining the general landscaping /hardscape design concept. 4. The gate house and gate elevations and design /materials were approved as submitted. Native river rock, as used on the existing wall pilasters, was approved for use on the gate house. NW ... i33N1S N1" ---- --- - - - --- fir, y 1 f ,... 7 - -- -------- a,vaa �niauronavrs 1� s EXHIBIT "B" I� W ia�w.iaw.w.uu.i ^_ E om � d,uan Va+Ne. x+ms_ j 1N'bU �lilJ+d.M -4 s N 0, ga SHAD0WGR0VE DRIVE O X 4th STREET SCALE = 20' .y," Exhibit SCALE i'= 20' 2 I I 2 W EL I I O 0 1 1 1- p �< a 0 Q LU ti � , W O I- \J 0 00 0 f 1 i yr. y :_ cG:.Y! - •. f s . -.n, Y F r^ JJJ 4j Q m Q In jA TIC' b i �. I I rc W N PO PPYFIEL 0 N C0UR7- Z nN '��•� O a L ', � R i E' 7 �. h7 N F, \ 00 �1 a f - i 0 0 JQ ai O X 4th STREET SCALE = 20' .y," Exhibit SCALE i'= 20' 2 I I 2 W EL • I I O y 1 1 1- Q LU � , W I- \J f 1 I7 Y F r^ t' jA TIC' b i I I N PO PPYFIEL 0 N C0UR7- Z • co C* 199JIS 419 0 CO --- — - ---------------------- — -0( CO 0 N GAija GAOJBMOPBLIS C4 0 -1 Coe =0 7- Ir CD LU i M W L --I L C8 a) L Z CO oc c uj cr- LLI 0 pnoo plellAdd0d = L) Exhibit "D" Ln Exhibit T" > co Cd 0 E 0 0 L L co L o o � 1 M 00 C: c + CO L 4-d c N 0 c JJ W 'I co leeils 419 01 "0 _lie cd 04 75 F-5 Exhibit T" CA Cv fi Exhibit "G" a�- IOA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 98 -16 AUTHORIZING GATED PRIVATE STREETS FOR AMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT 15727, IN THE LOW- MEDIUM DISTRICT (4 -8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOURTH STREET, WEST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND BORDERED BY SIXTH STREET ON THE NORTH, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 210 - 062 -02, 11, 13, 17, 18, 19, 26, 32, and 33. A. Recitals. 1. Griffin Industries has filed an application for Development Review 98 -16 for the design review of Amended Tentative Tract No. 15727, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 31st day of August 1998, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the application and Amended Tentative Tract 15727. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced meeting on August 31, 1998, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and b. That the proposed design is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and C. That the proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and d. That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby approves the application, to allow private gated streets in Amended Tentative Tract 15727 subject to each and every condition set forth below: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 98 -16 FOR TT 15727 - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES August 31, 1998 Page 2 Planning Division 1) Approval of the application is conditioned on approval by the City Council of Amended Tentative Tract 15727. 2) Emergency access, vehicle and pedestrian, shall be provided in the CC &Rs in a manner acceptable to the Police and Fire Departments. 3) A school bus stop shall be provided at the northeast corner of Golden Oak Road and Brook Drive. This feature will be identified with appropriate bus stop signing and paving between the adjacent side walk and curb line. The CC &Rs shall provide for convenient school bus access into the community for the school district(s) in a manner similar to Police and Fire Department access. 4) The gates and cul -de -sac fencing (at Glenaire and Springbrook Courts) shall be tubular steel and finished in a dark forest green color. The gates and fences shall not exceed 6 feet in height (above grade), but may extend to the height of the stone columns (no higher than 8 feet) as a design feature as shown on the main Fourth Street entry exhibit. 5) The guard house shall be constructed with stucco and a cobblestone base. The structure shall be finished with a native fieldstone base and with colors and materials previously approved for final tract phases, subject to approval by the City Planner. 6) The final landscape design shall be coordinated with the approved Landscape Plans for Fourth Street and Golden Oak Road and subject to City Engineer and City Planner approval. 7) A call /card box shall be provided for each vehicle entry. 8) Each gated entry/exit shall conform to minimum City, Police and Fire Department standards. 9) The landscaping along Fourth Street and Golden Oak Drive shall be installed as shown on approved plans on file with the Engineering Department. Reductions in the amount of cobblestone hard scape and increases in the amount of plant material may be considered and approved by the City Engineer and City Planner, at their discretion, while maintaining the general landscaping /hard scape design concept. Engineering Division 1) Install ultimate street improvements on the north side of Fourth Street from Archibald Avenue to Cucamonga Creek Channel including curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, a bus bay west of the existing entry monument, the intersection curb return, relocation of the most southerly catch basin on Archibald Avenue, and any traffic signal upgrades. Off -site street trees may be deferred until development of s• • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 98 -16 FOR TT 15727 - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES August 31, 1998 Page 3 the adjacent property. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover the cost of permanent off -site improvements from future development of the adjacent property. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within six months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. 2) Widen the west leg of the Fourth Street/Archibald Avenue intersection to accept three westbound through lanes from the Major Divided Arterial section, east of Archibald Avenue. Transition to a Major Arterial width (two westbound lanes, single left turn lane) a sufficient distance west of the intersection, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 3) Relocate up to eight 66 KV power poles as needed to accommodate the Fourth Street/Archibald Avenue intersection widening and lane drop. 4) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 KV electrical) on the project side of Fourth Street shall be undergrounded from the first pole on the east side of Archibald Avenue, to the first pole on the west side of the Cucamonga Creek Channel, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. All services crossing Fourth Street shall be undergrounded at the same time. 5) Install full frontage improvements along Sixth Street, from the east tract boundary to the west side of Golden Oak Road. Provide a cross gutter across Golden Oak Road and a temporary AC curb return on the west side, within the existing right -of -way. Widen the south side of Sixth Street as needed, west of Golden Oak Road, install AC berm, and reconstruct affected drive approaches to contain street flows, as determined by the final drainage study. Extend the widened section and berm from Golden Oak Road to Hellman Avenue. Transition to existing pavement east of the east tract boundary, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover the cost of permanent off -site improvements from future development of the adjacent property. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within six months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. 6) An in -lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of existing utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 KV electrical) on the opposite side of Sixth Street shall be paid to the City, prior to building permit issuance for the 104th house or any phase that includes that house. The fee shall be one -half the City adopted unit amount times the length of the project frontage. Unnecessary power poles on the south side of Sixth Street shall be removed. 7) Install Golden Oak Road full width, including sidewalk and street lights, from Fourth Street to Sixth Street, with Phase 1 development. in PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 98 -16 FOR TT 15727 - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES August 31, 1998 Page 4 Sidewalks along the park frontage shall be curb adjacent. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover the cost of permanent improvements west of the centerline on Golden Oak Road and north of a projection of the southerly BCR for the park drive approach, from future development of the adjacent property. If the developerfails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within six months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. 8) Install traffic signals at Fourth Street and Golden Oak Road and at Sixth Street and Golden Oak Road. The traffic signal at Fourth Street shall be operational prior to occupancy of the 100th unit. The traffic signal at Sixth Street shall be operational, prior to occupancy of the 150th unit or opening of the park, whichever occurs first. 9) Each development phase shall have two points of access and no temporary "dead end" streets shall be longer than 600 feet. 10) Prepare a final drainage study which addresses the following, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer: a) Deleted b) Substantiate that the existing facilities in Fourth Street can accommodate all flows reaching them in the ultimate (developed) condition and that Fourth Street is not adversely impacted by the lack of a storm drain lateral to pick up the sump east of Golden Oak Road. Determine the size of reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) needed to replace existing corrugated metal pipe (CMP). c) Provide a section through the flow line high point in Golden Oak Road, south of Sixth Street, to determine whether any Q100 flows will go south in Golden Oak Road. d) Provide hydrologic and hydraulic calculations. On -site storm drains shall be sized to accommodate all tributary areas in the ultimate (developed) condition. e) Revise the preliminary drainage study to reflect the Hearthside Court catch basin between nodes 15 and 16. Also include pages 8 and 9 missing from the printout for Catchment Area C. f) Determine the width of the surface overflow easement needed on Lot 14 to convey Q100 flows for the area tributary to the sump at the Springbrook Drive /Cedar Glen Place knuckle. 11) Construct all storm drains within the tract boundaries (private) and /or Fourth Street, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The developer may request a developer -to- developer reimbursement agreement, against future development within the vacant tributary area, for oversizing said facilities. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within six months of the improvements IE PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 98 -16 FOR TT 15727 - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES August 31, 1998 Page 5 being accepted by reimbursement shall credits will be given effect when building the City, all rights of the developer to terminate. No master plan storm drain fee and the developer shall pay drainage fees in permits are issued. 12) Replace the existing CMP in Fourth Street, between Archibald Avenue and Golden Oak Road, with appropriately sized RCP. Reconstruct both catch basins as determined by the final drainage study and install energy dissipation devices at the pipe outlet on the south side of Fourth Street. 13) The surface overflow drainage easement on Lot 14 shall be graded to convey Q100 overflows in the event of blockage in a sump catch basin and provisions shall be made for overflows to pass through any walls placed across the easement. Grade Lots 14 and 15, adjacent to the surface overflow drainage easement, to drain to Fourth Street through improved devices. Also design Lots A, B, C, D. and E to convey surface overflows. 14) Deleted 15) A parkway beautification master plan, including sections reflecting tree clearances required by Southern California Edison, shall be developed for Fourth Street, which expands upon the existing designated street trees and follows existing City Standards, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The Fourth Street frontage landscape treatment shall conform to said beautification master plan. 16) Interim facilities to drain the north property line will not be publicly maintained. They shall be located on individual lots and there shall be no public drainage easements. Private cross lot drainage easements shall be provided as required by, and the design of the facilities shall be approved by, the Building Official. 17) Deleted 18) Deleted 19) The park on Lot G shall be installed, with all standard neighborhood park facilities as presently provided forwith public improvement bonds for Tract 15727 -3, prior to occupancy of 30 percent of the units or prior to building permit issuance for 70 percent of the units, whichever occurs first. The park design, including grading, shall be approved by the Parks and Recreation Commission prior to final map approval. Parcels provided for park development shall be a minimum of 5 acres, based on the net yield for useable park open space. All dedicated park lands are to be located on non - restricted developable, unencumbered lands. This included, but is not limited to: clear title, no easements, no seismic faults, no grades greater than 10 percent and free from flood hazard. The public park is not to be included within the private gated community. 9a PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 98 -16 FOR TT 15727 - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES August 31, 1998 Page 6 20) All maps which have recorded to date shall be rescinded and new final maps recorded reflecting the interior private streets. All common areas for streets, storm drain facilities, sidewalks, street lights, and utilities shall be contained in a common easement. The surface overflow drainage easement on Lot 14 shall be private. 21) Revise Sheets 17 and 21 of Drawing No. 1628 to show the gated entrances. 22) All interior street and storm drain plans which have already been approved shall be revised to include the word "Private" in the title block. 23) Traffic signal plans at Fourth Street and Golden Oak Road shall be revised to reflect one leg of the intersection being private. Any decorative pavement and its effect on conduit specifications shall be indicated. Provide easements for the City to maintain the equipment. 24) The existing public storm drain easements created by separate document shall be vacated and replaced with private easements. 25) Existing public landscape easements, created by separate documents, shall be vacated and shown on the revised maps as private landscape easements in favor of the Homeowners' Association. The following easements shall be revised consistent with the approved Landscape Maintenance District Grading Plans: Lot 23 in Tract 15727 -2; Lots 1 and 6 in Tract 15272 -3; and Lot 26 in Tract 15727 -5. 26) Developer shall accept public drainage, from Golden Oak Park and Golden Oak Road north of the north project entry, and public and/or private drainage from adjacent undeveloped properties into the private street and storm drain system. 27) The line between public and private maintenance shall follow the curb on the east (park) side of the north entrance. 28) A copy of the CC &Rs approved by the City Attorney is required prior to approval of the final map. 29) The project CC &Rs shall indicate Homeowners' Association maintenance including, but not limited to, interior private streets and storm drains, street lights, sidewalks, landscaping within easements and lettered lots along Golden Oak Road, perimeter landscaping along Fourth Street, etc. The CC &Rs shall acknowledge future acceptance of landscaping between the private curb and a future perimeter wall on the west side of the north project entrance upon development of the adjacent property. The CC &Rs shall allow adjacent properties to join the private community if they so desire. If adjacent properties do not choose to join, they shall be permitted to use reciprocal emergency access and /or drainage easements. 4. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. 93 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 98 -16 FOR TT 15727 - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES August 31, 1998 Page 7 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 31ST DAY OF AUGUST 1998. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA M ATTEST: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 31 st day of August 1998, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ` zl RESOLUTION NO. e 1 -5 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT 15727, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 342 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS AND A 5 -ACRE PUBLIC NEIGHBORHOOD PARK ON 82 ACRES OF LAND WITH GATED, PRIVATE STREETS IN THE LOW- MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (4 -8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF FOURTH STREET AND THE CUCAMONGA CREEK FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL AND BORDERED BY SIXTH STREET ON THE NORTH - APN: 210 - 062 -02, 11, 13, 17, 18, 19, 26, 32, AND 33. A. Recitals. 1. On October 9, 1996, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 96 -67, thereby recommending approval, subject to specified conditions, of Tentative Tract No. 15727, which provides for the development of 342 single family lots and a neighborhood park on 82 acres of land within the Low - Medium Residential District (4 -8 dwelling units per acre). 2. On November 21, 1996, the City Council approved, subject to specified conditions, Tentative Tract No. 15727 by the adoption of Resolution 96 -165. 3. On June 24, 1998, a request was filed by Griffin Industries to amend Tentative Tract No. 15727 to allow for gated, private streets for the entire residential portion of the tract. 4. On August 26, and continued to August 31, 1998, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and recommended approval. 5. On September 2, 1998, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 6. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above - referenced public hearing on September 2, 1998 including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property generally located at the intersection of Fourth Street and the Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Channel and bordered by Sixth Street on the north, with a street frontage of 625 feet on Sixth Street and 1,835 feet on Fourth Street, a lot depth of 2,565 feet, and which is presently partially improved with new single family homes; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is developed with single family residential, the property to the south consists of apartments and open space flood control facilities, W1 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. AMEND. TT 15727 - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES September 2, 1998 Page 2 the property to the east is primarily vacant and underdeveloped and designated for industrial park uses, and the property to the west is largely underdeveloped; and C. The project, together with conditions of approval, will comply with all applicable standards of the Development Code; and d. The application proposes development at 4.68 dwelling units per acre, which is within the unit density range of the Development District for the properties; and e. The project is an in -fill piece with single family residential development to the north at similar density ranges and; hence, is a logical addition to the neighborhood. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the amended tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and b. That the design or improvements of the amended tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and C. That the site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and d. That the design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans or wildlife or their habitat; and e. That the amended tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and f. That the design of the amended tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision; and g. This application would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and an Environmental Impact Report has been prepared and certified by the City Council by separate Resolution. 4. This Council hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and that the Rancho Cucamonga Industrial Area Specific Plan Subarea 16 Redesignation Environmental Impact Report, that assessed the environmental impacts of Tentative Tract 15727, was certified on November 20, 1996, by adoption of City Council Resolution No. 96 -63. 5. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, plus the Rancho Cucamonga Industrial Area Specific Plan Subarea 16 Redesignation Environmental Impact Report, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: in CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. AMEND. TT 15727 - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES September 2, 1998 Page 3 a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the City Council; and, further, this Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. That, based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. C. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council during the public hearing, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1 -d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 6. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 above, this Council hereby recommends approval of the subject application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planninq Division 1) All applicable Mitigation Measures listed in Table 11 -1 of the "Industrial Area Specific Plan Subarea 16 Redesignation Environmental Impact Report," as certified by the City Council, shall be completed as described in the adopted Mitigation Monitoring Program. The mitigation measures include, but are not necessarily limited to the following items listed in the Mitigation Monitoring Program (Exhibit "A "): T -1, AQ -1, AQ -2, N -1, N -2, SW -1, SW -2, SW -3, SW -4, LU -1, LU -2, LU -3, LU -4, LU -5, P -1, FP -1, S -1, W -1, SD -1, SD -2, SD -3, SD -4, and CR -1. 2) A Master Plan of Walls and Phasing Plan shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Commission prior to the recordation of the final tract map. 3) Drainage easements provided on Lots 16, 35, 45, 55, 65, and 227 through 230 shall be improved as follows: a) The drainage easement at the end of "F" Street shall be totally on Lot 35, the drainage easement at the end of "H" Circle shall be totally on Lot 45, the drainage easement at the end of "I" Circle shall be totally on Lot 55, and the drainage easement at the end of "J" Circle shall be totally on Lot 65. b) The drainage easements on Lots 16, 35, 45, 55, 65, 227, 228, 229, and 230 shall be improved with irrigation systems and extensive plantings, the continuous length of the easements, 97 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. AMEND. TT 15727 - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES September 2, 1998 Page 4 prior to the final inspection on each lot and subject to City Planner approval. c) Lots 16, 227, 228, 229, and 230 shall be improved with 6 -foot high property line walls adjacent to each drainage easement from the rear property line to a point in alignment with the front house wall nearest the property line, and with an 18 -inch high property line wall from the front property line to the beginning of the 6 -foot property line wall, All walls shall comply with an approved Master Plan of Walls, subject to Planning Commission approval, and installed prior to final inspection on each lot. d) Mini sumps shall be provided along the northerly extent of the cul -de -sacs (within a right -of -entry easement of the northern properties) at Circles "J," "I," and "H" and "F" Street (between Lots 35 and 36, 45 and 46, 55 and 56, and 65 and 66), and the northerly extent of "R" Street (rear of Lots 227, 228, 229, and 230). 4) Landscaping and irrigation shall be installed along Fourth Street in landscape easements in compliance with a Conceptual Landscape Plan previously approved by the Planning Commission for public right - of -way landscape easements. The City Planner and the City Engineer may consider and approve some reductions in the cobble hardscape work and increases in the plant material counts while maintaining the general landscaping theme planned for the north side of Fourth Street. Landscaping shall be included along the future parkway area on the west side of Golden Oak Road, between Sixth Street and the boundary of the private community, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Planner. Landscaping and irrigation shall be installed along Golden Oak Road in landscape easements to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 5) Where rear lot drainage to a public facility can be achieved along "A" Street, the lot should be lowered with a rear lot grade break and depressing the pad the maximum amount possible below the street fronting the lot. 6) Lots 35, 36, 45, 46, 55, 56, 65, and 66 shall have a minimum width of 75 feet and a minimum side yard structural setback from the out parcels to the northeast of 30 feet with RV parking accommodations. Noise attenuation features will be included in the house walls facing the out parcels to ensure interior ambient noise levels required by the Development Code. 7) Pedestrian access is to be provided from "A" Street to the adjacent cul- de -sacs. 8) A disclosure statement shall be incorporated as a deed restriction on all residential lots informing future owners of the industrial zoned land to the east of the tract on both sides of Archibald Avenue. s � • CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. AMEND. TT 15727 - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES September 2, 1998 Page 5 9) The applicant shall fully mitigate the project's school facilities impacts by entering into a mitigation agreement with the Cucamonga School District prior to the issuance of any building permits. 10) Private streets, under the ownership of a Homeowners' Association may be gated as approved by Design Review 98 -16. 11) The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC &Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Division a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes. 12) Reciprocal emergency access and drainage easement agreements shall be provided for the adjacent property to the west in the area where "Old Post Road" ends at the west property line. 13) Emergency access, vehicle and pedestrian, shall be provided in the CC &Rs in a manner acceptable to the Police and Fire Departments. 14) A school bus stop shall be provided at the northeast corner of Golden Oak Road and Brook Drive. This feature will be identified with appropriate bus stop signing and paving between the adjacent sidewalk and curb line. The CC &Rs shall provide for convenient school bus access into the community for the school district(s) in a manner similar to Police and Fire Department access. 15) Each gated entry/exit shall conform to minimum City, Police, and Fire Department standards. Engineering Division 1) Install ultimate street improvements on the north side of Fourth Street from Archibald Avenue to Cucamonga Creek Channel including curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, a bus bay west of the existing entry monument, the intersection curb return, relocation of the most southerly catch basin on Archibald Avenue, and any traffic signal upgrades. Off -site street trees may be deferred until development of the adjacent property. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover the cost of permanent off -site improvements from future development of the adjacent property. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within six months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. 2) Widen the west leg of the Fourth Street/Archibald Avenue intersection to accept three westbound through lanes from the Major Divided Arterial section, east of Archibald Avenue. Transition to a Major s� FRI CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. AMEND. TT 15727 - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES September 2, 1998 Page 6 Arterial width (two westbound lanes, single left turn lane) a sufficient distance west of the intersection, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 3) Relocate up to eight 66 KV power poles as needed to accommodate the Fourth Street/Archibald Avenue intersection widening and lane drop. 4) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 KV electrical) on the project side of Fourth Street shall be undergrounded from the first pole on the east side of Archibald Avenue, to the first pole on the west side of the Cucamonga Creek Channel, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. All services crossing Fourth Street shall be undergrounded at the same time. 5) Install full frontage improvements along Sixth Street, from the east tract boundary to the west side of Golden Oak Road. Provide a cross gutter across Golden Oak Road and a temporary AC curb return on the west side, within the existing right -of -way. Widen the south side of Sixth Street as needed, west of Golden Oak Road, install A.C. berm, and reconstruct affected drive approaches to contain street flows, as determined by the final drainage study. Extend the widened section and berm from Golden Oak Road to Hellman Avenue. Transition to existing pavement east of the east tract boundary, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover the cost of permanent off -site improvements from future development of the adjacent property. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within six months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. 6) An in -lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of existing utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 KV electrical) on the opposite side of Sixth Street shall be paid to the City prior to building permit issuance for the 104th house or any phase that includes that house. The fee shall be one -half the City adopted unit amount times the length of the project frontage. Unnecessary power poles on the south side of Sixth Street shall be removed. 7) Install Golden Oak Road full width, including sidewalk and street lights, from Fourth Street to Sixth Street, with Phase 1 development. Sidewalks along the park frontage shall be curb adjacent. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover the cost of permanent improvements west of the centerline on Golden Oak Road and north of a projection of the southerly BCR for the park drive approach, from future development of the adjacent property. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within six months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. 160 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. AMEND. TT 15727 - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES September 2, 1998 Page 7 8) Install traffic signals at Fourth Street and Golden Oak Road and at Sixth Street and Golden Oak Road. The traffic signal at Fourth Street shall be operational prior to occupancy of the 100th unit. The traffic signal at Sixth Street shall be operational prior to occupancy of the 150th unit or opening of the park, whichever occurs first. 9) Each development phase shall have two points of access and no temporary "dead end" streets shall be longer than 600 feet. 10) Prepare a final drainage study which addresses the following, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer: a) Deleted b) Substantiate that the existing facilities in Fourth Street can accommodate all flows reaching them in the ultimate (developed) condition and that Fourth Street is not adversely impacted by the lack of a storm drain lateral to pick up the sump east of Golden Oak Road. Determine the size of reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) needed to replace existing corrugated metal pipe (CMP). c) Provide a section through the flow line high point in Golden Oak Road, south of Sixth Street, to determine whether any Q100 flows will go south in Golden Oak Road. d) Provide hydrologic and hydraulic calculations. On -site storm drains shall be sized to accommodate all tributary areas in the ultimate (developed) condition. e) Revise the preliminary drainage study to reflect the Hearthside Court catch basin between nodes 15 and 16. Also include pages 8 and 9 missing from the printout for Catchment Area C. f) Determine the width of the surface overflow easement needed on Lot 14 to convey Q100 flows for the area tributary to the sump at the Springbrook Drive /Cedar Glen Place knuckle. 11) Construct all storm drains within the tract boundaries (private) and/or Fourth Street, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The developer may request a developer -to- developer reimbursement agreement, against future development within the vacant tributary area, for oversizing said facilities. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within six months of the improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. No master plan storm drain fee credits will be given and the developer shall pay drainage fees in effect when building permits are issued. 12) Replace the existing CMP in Fourth Street, between Archibald Avenue and Golden Oak Road, with appropriately sized RCP. Reconstruct both catch basins as determined by the final drainage study and install /D/ CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. AMEND. TT 15727 - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES September 2, 1998 Page 8 energy dissipation devices at the pipe outlet on the south side of Fourth Street. 13) The surface overflow drainage easement on Lot 14 shall be graded to convey Q100 overflows in the event of blockage in a sump catch basin and provisions shall be made for overflows to pass through any walls placed across the easement. Grade Lots 14 and 15, adjacent to the surface overflow drainage easement, to drain to Fourth Street through improved devices. Also design Lots A, B, C, D, and E to convey surface overflows. 14) Deleted 15) A parkway beautification master plan, including sections reflecting tree clearances required by Southern California Edison, shall be developed for Fourth Street which expands upon the existing designated street trees and follows existing City Standards, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The Fourth Street frontage landscape treatment shall conform to said beautification master plan. 16) Interim facilities to drain the north property line will not be publicly maintained. They shall be located on individual lots and there shall be no public drainage easements. Private cross lot drainage easements shall be provided as required by, and the design of the facilities shall be approved by, the Building Official. 17) Deleted 18) Deleted 19) The park on Lot G shall be installed, with all standard neighborhood park facilities as presently provided for with public improvement bonds for Tract 15727 -3, prior to occupancy of 30 percent of the units or prior to building permit issuance for 70 percent of the units, whichever occurs first. The park design, including grading, shall be approved by the Parks and Recreation Commission prior to final map approval. Parcels provided for park development shall be a minimum of 5 acres, based on the net yield for useable park open space. All dedicated park lands are to be located on non - restricted developable, unencumbered lands. This included, but is not limited to: clear title, no easements, no seismic faults, no grades greater than 10 percent and free from flood hazard. The public park is not to be included within the private gated community. 20) All maps which have recorded to date shall be rescinded and new final maps recorded reflecting the interior private streets. All common areas for streets, storm drain facilities, sidewalks, street lights, and utilities shall be contained in a common easement. The surface overflow drainage easement on Lot 14 shall be private. 21) Revise Sheets 17 and 21 of Drawing 1628 to show the gated entrances. !6J CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. AMEND. TT 15727 - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES September 2, 1998 Page 9 22) All interior street and storm drain plans which have already been approved shall be revised to include the word "Private" in the title block. 23) Traffic signal plans at Fourth Street and Golden Oak Road shall be revised to reflect one leg of the intersection being private. Any decorative pavement and its effect on conduit specifications shall be indicated. Provide easements for the City to maintain the equipment. 24) The existing public storm drain easements created by separate document shall be vacated and replaced with private easements. 25) Existing public landscape easements, created by separate documents, shall be vacated and shown on the revised maps as private landscape easements in favor of the Homeowners Association. The following easements shall be revised consistent with the approved Landscape Maintenance District Grading Plans: Lot 23 in Tract 15727 -2; Lots 1 and 6 in Tract 15272 -3; and Lot 26 in Tract 15727 -5. 26) Developer shall accept public drainage, from Golden Oak Park and Golden Oak Road north of the north project entry, and public and /or private drainage from adjacent undeveloped properties into the private street and storm drain system. 27) The line between public and private maintenance shall follow the curb on the east (park) side of the north entrance. 28) A copy of the CC &Rs approved by the City Attorney is required prior to approval of the final map. 29) The project CC &Rs shall indicate Homeowners' Association maintenance including, but not limited to, interior private streets and storm drains, street lights, sidewalks, landscaping within easements and lettered lots along Golden Oak Road, perimeter landscaping along Fourth Street, etc. The CC &Rs shall acknowledge future acceptance of landscaping between the private curb and a future perimeter wall on the west side of the north project entrance upon development of the adjacent property. The CC &Rs shall allow adjacent properties to join the private community if they so desire. If adjacent properties do not choose to join, they shall be permitted to use reciprocal emergency access and /or drainage easements. 7. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. /a.3 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: AMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT 15727 SUBJECT: A RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OF 342 SINGLE FAMILY HOMES APPLICANT: CUCAMONGA CORNERPOINTE LLC LOCATION: FOURTH STREET & CUCAMONGA CREEK FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477 -2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. Time Limits Completion Date 1. Approval shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, if building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 24 months from the date of approval. 2. Approval of Amended Tentative Tract No. 15727 is granted subject to the approval of General Plan Amendment 95 -03A, Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 95 -04. & Development District Amendment 95 -02. 3. The developer shall commence, participate in, and consummate or cause to be commenced, participated in, or consummated, a Mello -Roos Community Facilities District (CFD) for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District to finance construction and/or maintenance of a fire station to serve the development. The station shall be located, designed, and built to all specifications of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and shall become the District's property upon completion. The equipment shall be selected by the District in accordance with its needs. In any building of a station, the developer shall comply with all applicable laws and regulations. The CFD shall be formed by the District and the developer by the time recordation of the final map occurs. 4. Prior to recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first, the applicant shall consent to, or participate in, the establishment of a Mello -Roos Community Facilities District for the construction and maintenance of necessary school facilities. However, if any school district has previously established such a Community Facilities District, the applicant shall, in the alternative, consent to the annexation of the project site into the territory of such existing District prior to the recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first. Further, if the affected school district has not formed a Mello -Roos Community Facilities District within twelve months from the date of approval of the project and prior to the recordation of the final map or issuance of building permits for said project, this condition shall be deemed null and void. SC - 3/96 91 Project No. AMEND TO TT 15727 This condition shall be waived if the City receives notice that the applicant and all affected school districts have entered into an agreement to privately accommodate any and all school impacts as a result of this project. Prior to recordation of the final map or prior to the issuance of building permits when no map is involved, written certification from the affected water district that adequate sewer and water facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and the Industrial Area Specific Plan. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 3. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 5. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 6. All ground- mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and /or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map. 8. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC &R's) shall not prohibit the keeping the equine animals where zoning requirements for the keeping of said animals have been met. Individual lot owners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity of appealing to boards of directors of homeowners' associations for amendments to the CC &R's. 9. Solar access easements shall be dedicated for the purpose of assuming that each lot or dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or units for use of a solar energy system. The easements may be contained in a Declaration of Restrictions for the subdivision which shall be recorded concurrently with the recordation of the final map or issuance of permits, whichever comes first. The easements shall prohibit the casting of shadows by vegetation, structures, fixtures, or any other object, except for utility wires and similar objects, pursuant to Development Code Section 17.08.060 -G -2. SC - 3196 Completion Date 106 Project No. AMEND TO TT 15727 Completion Date 10. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for City Planner and City Engineer approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. C. Trip Reduction 1. Telecommuting center shall be provided for single - family development of 500 or more units or contribute toward the development of one in an amount satisfactory to the City Council. 2. Transit improvements such as bus shelters, bus pullouts, and bus pads shall be provided. D. Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in this case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. 2. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19.08.110, and so noted on the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods. 3. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater —I —I slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15- gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1- gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5- gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 4. For single family residential development, all slope planting and irrigations shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Division to determine that they are in satisfactory condition. 5. Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development Code. This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. 6. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Division. 7. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right -of -way on the _l l perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 8. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the —I_I design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division. SC - 3196 3 166 Project No. AMEND TO TT 15727 Completion Date 9. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. E. Environmental 1. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. F. Other Agencies 1. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mail boxes. Multi- family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mail boxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mail boxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. APPLICANTS SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477 -2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: G. Site Development 1. The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical _ /_ /_ Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of issuance of relative permits. Please contact the Building and Safety Division for copies of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. H. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. 3. The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance of building permits. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477 -2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Rights -of -way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and /or tentative map. Private easements for non - public facilities (cross -lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc.) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. SC - 3196 4 167 J Project No. AMEND To TT 15727 2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights -of -way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 50 -60 total feet on Fourth Street 44 total feet on Sixth Street 3. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. 4. Private drainage easements for cross -lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map. 5. All existing easements lying within future rights -of -way shall be quitclaimed or delineated on the final map. 6. Easements for public sidewalks and /or street trees placed outside the public right -of -way shall be dedicated to the City. 7. Additional street right -of -way shall be dedicated along the bus bay on Fourth Street, to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs. Curb adjacent sidewalk shall be used along the bus bay. 8. The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off -site property interests necessary to construct the required public improvements, and if he /she should fail to do so, the developer shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Section 66462 at such time as the City acquires the property interests required for the improvements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off -site property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security for a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the developer, at developer's cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. Street Improvements All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and /or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 2. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Street Name Curb & Gutter A. C. Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr. Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Trail Other Fourth Street ✓ ✓ c ✓ ✓ e f Sixth Street ✓ ✓,b g ✓ ✓ SC - 3196 Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in -lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. (e) Class II Bike Lane in street. (f) Bus bay per Standard 119, west of entry Completion Date 1 / Project No. AMEND TO TT 15727 Completion Date monument on Fourth Street. (g) Sixth Street sidewalk along Park frontage shall be curb adjacent. 3. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees , street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right -of -way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required. C. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduitwith pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: (1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. (2) Conduit shall be 3 -inch (at intersections) or 2 -inch (along streets) galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with _I_I adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check. 4. Street improvement plans per City Standards for all private streets shall be provided for review and approval by the City Engineer. Prior to any work being performed on the private streets, fees shall be paid and construction permits shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required. 5. Street trees, a minimum of 15- gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. SC - 3196 6 X09 Project No. AMEND TO TT 15727 Completion Date 6. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. K. Public Maintenance Areas 1. A signed consent and waiver form to join and /or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. L. Drainage and Flood Control 1. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 2. A permit from the San Bernardino County Flood Control District and the Army Corps of Engineers _/ ! is required for work within their rights -of -way. 3. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk. 4. Private storm drain easements shall be graded to convey overflows in the event of a blockage in a sump catch basin on the private street. M. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 3. Water Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the — / —/- Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. N. General Requirements and Approvals 1. Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their right -of -way: Southern California Edison and the City of Ontario. 2. A non - refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new street lights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. 3. Prior to finalization of any development phase, sufficient improvement plans shall be completed beyond the phase boundaries to assure secondary access and drainage protection to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Phase boundaries shall correspond to lot lines shown on the approved tentative map. SC - 3196 /�D / / I Project No. AMEND TO TT 15727 Completion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE PREVENTION /NEW CONSTRUCTION UNIT, (909) 477 -2730, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: O. General Fire Protection Conditions 1. Mello Roos Community Facilities District requirements shall apply to this project. —I_I 2. Fire flow requirement shall be 1,000 gallons per minute. _I_I a. A fire flow shall be conducted by the builder /developer and witnessed by fire department personnel prior to water plan approval. b. For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional fire flow test of the on -site hydrants shall — / —/- be conducted by the builder /developer and witnessed by the fire department personnel after construction and prior to occupancy. 3. Fire hydrants are required. All required public or on -site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivery of any combustible building materials on site (i.e., lumber, roofing materials, etc.). Hydrants flushing shall be witnessed by fire department personnel. 4. Existing fire hydrant locations shall be provided prior to water plan approval. Required hydrants, if any, will be determined by the Fire District. Fire District standards require a 6" riser with a 4" and a 2 -1/2" outlet. Substandard hydrants shall be upgraded to meet this standard. Contact the Fire Safety Division for specifications on approved brands and model numbers. 5. Hydrant reflective markers (blue dots) shall be required for all hydrants and installed prior to final _I_I inspection. 6. All roadways within project shall comply with the Fire District's fire lane standards, as noted: X Other: See Ordinance No. 22 regarding cul -de -sacs, lengths, and turnaround . — / —/- 7. Plan check fees in the amount of $ 125.00 shall be paid prior to final plan approval. Note: Separate plan check fees for fire protection systems (sprinklers, hood systems, alarms, etc.) and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed upon submittal of plans. 8. Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 1994 UBC, UFC, UPC, UMC, NEC, and RCFD Standards 22 and 15. 9. All trees and shrubs planted in any median shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14 feet, 6 inches from ground up so as not to impede fire apparatus. 10. A Knox rapid entry key vault shall be installed prior to final inspection. Proof of purchase shall —I be submitted prior to final building plan approval. Contact the Fire Safety Division for specific details and ordering information. 11. Gated /restricted entry(s) require installation of a Knox rapid entry key system. Contact the Fire Safety Division for specific details and ordering information. 12. A $132 Fire District fee and a $1 per "plan page" microfilm fee will be due to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District prior to Building and Safety permit issuance. SC - 3196 8 / / I k-1 i r vr' ►viivkni.) k-A)%- r1iviv1NVJ1% STAFF REPORT DATE: September 2, 1998 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer SUBJECT: VACATION OF A PORTION OF SAN BERNARDINO ROAD EAST OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION FRONTING 8333, 8363 FOOTHILI, BOULEVARD AND 8351 SAN BERNARDINO ROAD RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution ordering the vacation of a portion of San Bernardino Road east ofthe Foothill Boulevard Signalized intersection fronting 8333, 8363 Foothill Boulevard and 8351 San Bernardino Road as described in Exhibit "A ". BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS On June 25, 1997, Planning Commission approved Conditional Use Permit 97 -09 for a 106,301 square foot mixed use storage facility in subarea 1 (community commercial) of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. A condition of the approval is to vacate the San Bernardino Road frontage Road. On August 5, 1998 the City Council passed Resolution No. 98 -136 declaring its intention to vacate said existing street and set the date of September 2, 1998 in the City Hall Council Chamber, as the time and place for hearing all persons objecting to the proposed vacation. Easements will be provided for all existing utilities as directed by the affected utility companies. The vacated street will be removed and incorporated into the front landscaping setback. San Bernardino Road will curve into Foothill Boulevard as indicated on the attached exhibits. The developer will provide the public improvements necessary to achieve the vacation. Caltrans has reviewed the plans and concurs with the proposed improvements. /JO'� The application for street vacation has been submitted and the Developer is now requesting the vacation to occur. The vacation of the Street is in conformity with the adopted City General Plan and the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. Respectfull submitted, Willian 'Neil City Engineer WJO:MEP: Attachments � �3 f �C U �R \0\ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION � u�luJJn� � i i Tmrn i J 11111JIJ 1� ITEM: V -151 TITLE: Vicinity Map EXHIBIT: "A" ,s 1 1 I ti� I I \ I I � I I \ I 1 ` I I ` I I \ I I I ell I II I �II II II II I II I II I II I II 1 — II I —_ II I II 1 II 1 .II I Y V/ .l J e G r s - � e Im I >i r� Cd Q II I A l l i 1 Id I -t -- — - - -- \ - = a � �4 Z d � JW 0� � C e _ W w � p � ¢= a 6 x � �< u v log C 6 ud w+ 'nV ® u ��•- i y ` - - - - - - - -J J` I - -- - -- .. -- T - - -- -- -' - -- -l. i I CL L w. I I I I I I- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - -- ca • vlavt vin m � , I � 0 Ea M U W a FZ H 11.5 RESOLUTION NO. q?— IS 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TO BE VACATED A PORTION OF SAN BERNARDINO ROAD EAST OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION FRONTING 8333, 8363 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND 8351 SAN BERNARDINO ROAD - APN'S 207 -571- 76,77,78 WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 98 -136 passed on August 5, 1998, the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga declared its intention to vacate a portion of City street hereinafter more particularly described, and set the hour of 7:00 p.m. on September 2, 1998, in the City Council Chambers, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, as the time and place for hearing all persons objecting to the proposed vacation; and WHEREAS, such public hearing has been held at said time and place and there were no protests, oral or written, to such vacation. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION LThe Council hereby finds by all the evidence submitted the portion of San Bernardino Road East oftheFoothill Boulevard Signalized intersection fronting 8333, 8363 Foothill Boulevard and 8351 San Bernardino Road is unnecessary for present or prospective public street purposes, and the City Council hereby makes its order vacating that portion of said City street as shown on Map No. V -151 on file in the office of the Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which has been further described in a legal description which is attached hereto, marked Exhibits "A" and "B ", and by reference made a part hereof. SECTION 2:The subject vacation as set forth in Exhibits "A" and "B" shall be subject to the reservations and exceptions, if any, for existing utilities. SECTION 3:The Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resolution to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. SECTION 4:The Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution, and it shall thereupon take effect and be in force. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 2 °1 day of September, 1998 %14 EXHIBIT "A" SAN BERNARDINO ROAD STREET VACATION THAT PORTION OF LOT 6, SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 7 WEST OF CUCAMONGA LANDS, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 4, PAGE 9 OF MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 6; THENCE SOUTH 0 012'30" WEST ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT, 55.32 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON - TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHWEST AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 234 FEET, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARING SOUTH 18 022'49" EAST; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 14 019'45" AN ARC LENGTH OF 58.52 FEET TO A POINT IN A LINE THAT IS PARALLEL WITH AND 30 FEET SOUTHERLY, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO, THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 6, SAID POINT BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 11 045'19" AN ARC LENGTH OF 48.01 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 6; THENCE SOUTH 89 °50'00" EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, 72.93 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON - TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 75.00 FEET, A RADIAL BEARING TO SAID POINT BEARING SOUTH 29 °20'10" WEST; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 15 012'23" AN ARC LENGTH OF 19.91 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A COMPOUND CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTH AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 2469 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 2 023'01" AN ARC LENGTH OF 102.72 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE ABOVE MENTIONED PARALLEL LINE; THENCE NORTH 89 050'00" WEST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE 228.93 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINS 4288 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS ALL AS SHOWN ON THE MAP ATTACHED HEREWITH MARKED EXHIBIT "B" AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART THEREOF. L.S. Q %% 7 N.W. COR. POINT OF BEGINNING 8 OQTHI EXHIBIT "B" -, L L LOT 6 - == 24p0•�o• SOUL nod cm . v _.._RD _ L02�J'N ' LY LINE LOT 6� N89'S0'00'W 2 � 102.i -- -_ -_ -- � 01- I 51.77' — -- I I I I 1 I 1 SAN BERNARDINO ROAD STREET VACATION "j Jf��F Of alloll TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING .31 r�l A - 14'19'45' w+ R - 234.00' r L - 58.52' T - 29.41' IA - 1512'23 I 1Q R - 75.00' I L - 19.91' I A - 11'45'19' T - 10.01' R - 234.00' I L - 48.01' I T - 24.09' I I I I 1 I 1 SAN BERNARDINO ROAD STREET VACATION "j Jf��F Of alloll 1.1 1 Y VI' KALINk -I I k- Ul- AMUINUA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 2, 1998 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer SUBJECT: DISPOSITION BY QUITCLAIM OF A PORTION OF SAN BERNARDINO ROAD EAST OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION FRONTING 8351 SAN BERNARDINO ROAD RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution for disposition of City owned property being a portion of San Bernardino Road east of the Foothill Boulevard Signalized intersection fronting 8351 San Bernardino Road, a full true complete description of said property is set forth in that true and correct copy of the Quitclaim Deed, shown and described in Exhibits "A" and "B ", attached herewith. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS September 24, 1959 the County of San Bernardino acquired, for the amount of $1.00, a 14' strip of land for San Bernardino Road from 8351 San Bernardino Road and the parcel to the east. The 14' strip is south of the original 30' wide San Bernardino Road right -of -way. On June 25, 1997, Planning Commission approved Design Review 97 -09 for a 106,301 square foot mixed use storage facility in subarea 1 (community commercial) of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. One of the conditions of the Design Review approval is to vacate (quitclaim) a portion of San Bernardino Road which currently functions as a frontage road. On July 8, 1998, Planning Commission found that the disposition of the right -of -way is in conformance with the General Plan and the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. The quitclaimed street will be removed and the area incorporated into the proposed development and maintained by the developer. On August 5, 1998 the City Council declared it's intent to dispose of by quitclaim the subject property. ii9 The application for the quitclaim process has been submitted and the developer is now requesting the disposition occur. The street quitclaim is in conformity with the adopted City General Plan and the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. Respectfully submitted, William J. it City Engineer WJO:MEP: Attachments is a f,x, I-h Co Q � SAN BERNARDINO ROAD t I V", - -- �� W i�l It _ PROJECT LOCATION CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION �N/ ITEM: TITLE: EXHIBIT: V - 151A Vicinity Map "All ial ILL 130 U41A �D SAN BERNARDINO ROAD CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION I I AREA TO BE QUITCLAIMED 17 i V-. �a• ITEM: V - 151A TITLE: Area to be Quitclaimed EXHIBIT: "B" Id d, n s r: J Y � � R U V j U CL = �1 ac cri I I ` CL Of , • m _ — v c C 4 - - -- ~; P it I I - - - -0- ------- i--- r--- T - - -T- 0 I I I I � Vid`dl VIA m . I I I I )a3 RESOLUTION NO. /F-15g A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA FINDING THAT CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, TO BE SURPLUS AND A BURDEN ON THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER TO SIGN THE QUITCLAIM DEED AN TO PRESENT SAME TO THE COUNTY RECORDER TO BE FILED FOR RECORD WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 98 -137 passed on August 5, 1998, the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga declared it intention to quitclaim a portion of City street hereinafter more particularly described, and set the hour of 7:00 p.m. on September 2, 1998, in the City Council Chambers, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, as the time and place for hearing all person objecting to the proposed disposition by quitclaim; and WHEREAS, The City Council found all the evidence submitted that the portion of San Bernardino Road is unnecessary for present or prospective public street purposes; and WHEREAS, since that portion of San Bernardino Road is owned by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in fee, a Quitclaim Deed is required, hereby remising, releasing and quitclaiming the right to said portion of San Bernardino Road; and WHEREAS, such public hearing has been held at said time and place and there were no protests, oral or written, to such disposition by quitclaim. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: The council hereby makes its order vacating that portion of San Bernardino Road ( a 14 foot strip fronting 8351 San Bernardino Road) as shown on map V -151a, on file in the office the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which has been further described in a legal description and plat attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A" and "B ", and by reference made a part hereof. SECTION 2 : That from and after the date the resolution is recorded, said portion of San Bernardino Road no longer constitutes a street or public utility easement. SECTION 3: That the City Engineer is authorized to sign the Quitclaim Deed and to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. SECTION 4: That the City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resolution and exhibits to recorded along with the Quitclaim Deed in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. is y CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. QUITCLAIM A PORTION OF SAN BERNARDINO ROAD September 2, 1998 Page 2 SECTION 5: That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution, and it shall thereupon take effect and be in force. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 2 °d day of September, 1998 a.s �i i r Ur xHiNf._-rnU 1_,U1_,r- VV1U1NUA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 2, 1998 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Paul Biane and Jim Curatalo, as members of the Cable Television Subcommittee SUBJECT: Transfer of ownership of Marks CableVision to American Cable Entertainment (A.C.E) Company, LLC. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the transfer of ownership of the Marks CableVision cable system to American Cable Entertainment (A.C.E.) Company, LLC. BACKGROUND: Since February 1994, Marks CableVision has provided cable service to nearly 23,000 Rancho Cucamonga residents. Earlier this year, Marks CableVision agreed to sell its cable system to American Cable Entertainment (A.C.E.), an experienced cable operator. The Marks CableVision cable system currently serves the the cities of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino and Yucaipa and portions of San Bernardino County. A.C.E. presently owns 10 cable clusters in 10 states, serving a total of 110,000 subscribers. In California, A.C.E. (through its affiliate Scott Cable), owns and operates the Hi -Desert cable system serving the communities of Apple Valley, Hesperia and Victorville, as well as the Tahoe Paradise community in El Dorado County. It is A.C.E.'s intent to upgrade the existing system to 750 MHz capacity and reverse the path for two -way communications capability. Upon the completion of the upgrade, A.C.E. plans to add new products, including digital tiers and high speed data services. ANALYSIS: In adherence to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) current regulations and Section 7.02. 100 of Chapter 7.02 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, Marks CableVision and A.C.E. have jointly submitted a copy of FCC Form 394 required for the legal transfer of ownership from Marks CableVision to A.C.E. After reviewing the FCC Form 394, the City found that A.C.E. has legal, technical and financial ability to operate and maintain the Marks CableVision cable system. Upon the approval of the transfer of ownership, A.C.E. assumes all rights, duties, and agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the assignor (Marks CableVision) as expressed in the City's current Cable Television Franchise Agreement. Respectfully Submitted, Paul Bian—e J Curatalo Councilmember uncilmember Attachment ia(/P CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NO. -98-146 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AUTHORIZING THE ASSIGNMENT AND TRANSFER OF A CABLE TELEVISION FRANCHISE AGREEMENT BY DCA CABLEVISION TO AMERICAN CABLE ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY, LLC RECITALS: A. DCA Cablevision, dba Marks Cablevision, ( "Franchisee ") is the duly authorized holder of a franchise ( "Franchise ") that authorizes the construction, operation, and maintenance of a cable television system within the City of Rancho Cucamonga ( "Franchise Authority "). B. On July 27, 1998, the Franchise Authority received from the Franchisee and from American Cable Entertainment Company, LLC ( "Transferee ") an application for the assignment and transfer of the existing Franchise, which application included FCC Form 394 entitled "Application for Franchise Authority Consent to Assignment or Transfer of Control of Cable Television Franchise." Supplemental information was provided to the Franchise Authority by the Franchisee and the Transferee on August 12, 1998. C. In accordance with Section 7.02.100 of Chapter 7.02 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, the Franchise Authority has the right to review and to approve the financial, technical, and legal qualifications of the Transferee in connection with the proposed assignment and transfer of the Franchise. D. The staff of the Franchise Authority has reviewed the documentation that accompanied FCC Form 394 and, based upon the representations set forth in that documentation, has concluded that the proposed Transferee has the requisite financial, technical, and legal qualifications to adequately perform, or to ensure the performance of, all obligations required of the Franchisee under the Franchise, and that the Transferee will be bound by all existing terms, conditions, and obligations under the Franchise previously granted by the Franchise Authority to the Franchisee. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: 980819 11231 -00001 syc 0593718 1 �a� Section 1. In accordance with Section 7.02.100 of Chapter 7.02 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, the Franchise Authority consents to and approves the proposed assignment and transfer of the Franchise by DCA Cablevision, dba Marks Cablevision to American Cable Entertainment Company, LLC. Section 2. The authorization, consent and approval of the Franchise Authority to the proposed assignment and transfer is conditioned upon compliance by the Franchisee or the Transferee with the following requirements, as to which they are jointly and severally responsible: 1. The Franchisee and the Transferee will execute and file in the office of the City Clerk an "Assignment and Assumption Agreement" in substantially the form attached to this resolution as Exhibit A. The Mayor is authorized to execute that document and thereby evidence the written consent of the Franchise Authority to the assignment and assumption of all rights and obligations under the Franchise. 2. An original or conformed copy of the written instrument evidencing the closing and consummation of the proposed transfer and assignment of the Franchise must be filed in the office of the City Clerk within 30 days after that closing and consummation. 3. The Franchise Authority will be reimbursed for all costs and expenses reasonably incurred by the Franchise Authority's staff in processing and evaluating the information relating to the proposed transfer and assignment of the Franchise; provided, however, that those costs and expenses will not exceed the sum of $10,000 and will be set forth in an itemized statement transmitted by the City Manager, or the City Manager's designee, to the Franchisee and the Transferee within 30 days after the effective date of this Resolution. Section 3. Nothing contained in this Resolution may be construed to extend the term of the Franchise, which will terminate in its entirety on April 17, 2000. Section 4. The City Clerk is directed to transmit a certified copy of this resolution to the following persons: Day L. Patterson, Esq. Senior Vice President and General Counsel American Cable Entertainment Company, LLC Four Landmark Square, Suite 302 Stamford, Connecticut 06901 -2502 Mr. Colin J. Clapton, President Marks Cablevision 4240 N. Hallmark Parkway San Bernardino, California 92407 980819 11231 -00001 syc 0593718 1 — 2 — �a g EXHIBIT A ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT (CABLE TELEVISION FRANCHISE AGREEMENT) THIS ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT ( "Agreement ") is made and entered into this day of , 1998, by and between DCA Cablevision, dba Marks Cablevision, a California joint venture ( "Assignor "), American Cable Entertainment Company, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ( "Assignee "), and the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a California municipal corporation ( "Franchise Authority "). RECITALS• A. Assignor is the authorized holder of a franchise that authorizes the construction, operation, and maintenance of a cable television system within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Assignor's nonexclusive cable television franchise will expire by its terms on April 17, 2000. B. Subject to the prior consent of the Franchise Authority, Assignor desires to assign and transfer to Assignee, and Assignee desires to assume, all rights, duties, and obligations under that certain cable television franchise agreement between the Franchise Authority and the Assignor that became effective on April 18, 1985, and was thereafter amended ( "Franchise Agreement "). THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. Assignor assigns and transfers to Assignee all of Assignor's rights, duties, and obligations under the Franchise Agreement. 2. Assignee covenants and agrees with Assignor and with the Franchise Authority to assume all rights and to assume and perform all duties and obligations of the Assignor under the Franchise Agreement. 3. Franchise Authority consents to the assignment and transfer by Assignor to Assignee of all rights, duties, and obligations specified in the Franchise Agreement. TO EFFECTUATE THIS AGREEMENT, the parties have caused this Assignment and Assumption Agreement to be executed by their 980819 11231 -00001 syc 0593719 1 / a9 duly authorized representatives as of the date set forth below the authorized signature. "ASSIGNOR" DCA CABLEVISION, dba MARKS CABLEVISION By TMG HOLDINGS, INC. (managing general partner) APPROVED AS TO FORM: By Title Date Legal Counsel "ASSIGNEE" AMERICAN CABLE ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY, LLC APPROVED AS TO FORM: By Title Legal Counsel Date "FRANCHISE AUTHORITY" CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVED AS TO FORM: By Mayor City Attorney Date ATTEST: City Clerk 990919 11231 -00001 syc 0593719 1 - 2 - /,3D Amen n Cable ENTERTAINMENT August 12, 1998 Mrs. Jenny Haruyama The City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Dear Jenny: At your request, I want to take this opportunity to confirm what I told you and Jerry Fulwood about our plans for improvements in the cable system serving the city. We intend to upgrade the existing system to 750 MHz capacity and to activate the reverse path for two way communications capability. Upon completion of this upgrade, we intend to add new products, including digital tiers and high speed data services, to our service offerings. As soon as possible after closing, we want to enter into negotiations with the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an extension of that franchise, which is currently scheduled to expire in 2000. We will begin the upgrade after obtaining that extension and we anticipate that upgrade will take 18 months or so to complete. We are excited about becoming the successor to Marks Cablevision in serving the City. I hope our plans to upgrade the system and introduce new services will serve as evidence of our intent to be forward thinking in our approach to services and a good corporate citizen. My thanks again to you and Jerry Fulwood for your efforts regarding this Franchise Transfer. Sincerely, Bruce A. Armst ng President & CEO BAA: hj cc: Tim Kelley Four Landmark Square, Suite 302, Stamford, Connecticut 06901 Phone: (203) 323 -1100 • Fax: (203) 325 -3110 1.31 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. AMEND. TT 15727 - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES September 2, 1998 Page 4 c) Lots 16, 227, 228, 229, and 230 shall be improved with 6 -foot - high property line walls adjacent to each drainage easement from the rear property line to a point in alignment with the front house wall nearest the property line, and with an 18 -inch high property line wall from the front property line to the beginning of the 6 -foot property line wall, All walls shall comply with an approved Master Plan of Walls, subject to Planning Commission approval, and installed prior to final inspection on each lot. d) Mini sumps shall be provided along the northerly extent of the cul-de -sacs (within a right -of -entry easement of the northern properties) at Circles "J," "l," and "H" and "F" Street (between Lots 35 and 36, 45 and 46, 55 and 56, and 65 and 66), and the northerly extent of "R" Street (rear of Lots 227, 228, 229, and 230). 4) Landscaping and irrigation shall be installed along Fourth Street in landscape easements in compliance with a Conceptual Landscape Plan previously approved by the Planning Commission for public right - of -way landscape easements. The City Planner and the City Engineer may consider and approve some reductions in the cobble hardscape work and increases in the plant material counts while maintaining the general landscaping theme planned for the north side of Fourth Street. Landscaping shall be included along the future parkway area on the west side of Golden Oak Road, between Sixth Street and the boundary of the private community, to the satisfaction.of the City Engineer and the city Planner. The final plan shall be submitted to the Design Review Committee for approval. Landscaping and irrigation shall be installed along Golden Oak Road in landscape easements to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 5) Where rear lot drainage to a public facility can be achieved along "A" Street, the lot should be lowered with a rear lot grade break and depressing the pad the maximum amount possible below the street fronting the lot. 6) Lots 35, 36, 45, 46, 55, 56, 65, and 66 shall have a minimum width of 75 feet and a minimum side yard structural setback from the out parcels to the northeast of 30 feet with RV parking accommodations. Noise attenuation features will be included in the house walls facing the out parcels to ensure interior ambient noise levels required by the Development Code. 7) Pedestrian access is to be provided from "A" Street to the adjacent cul- de -sacs. 8) A disclosure statement shall be incorporated as a deed restriction on all residential lots informing future owners of the industrial zoned land to the east of the tract on both sides of Archibald Avenue. 9) The applicant shall fully mitigate the project's school facilities impacts by entering into a mitigation agreement with the Cucamonga School District prior to the issuance of any building permits. qQ CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. AMEND. TT 15727 - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES September 2, 1998 Page 7 8) Install traffic signals at Fourth Street and Golden Oak Road and at Sixth Street and Golden Oak Road. The traffic signal at Fourth Street shall be operational prior to occupancy of the 100th unit. The traffic signal at Sixth Street shall be operational prior to occupancy of the 150th unit or opening of the park, whichever occurs first. 9) Each development phase shall have two points of access and no temporary "dead end" streets shall be longer than 600 feet. 10) Prepare a final drainage study which addresses the following, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer: a) Deleted b) Substantiate that the existing facilities in Fourth Street can accommodate all flows reaching them in the ultimate (developed) condition and that Fourth Street is not adversely impacted by the lack of a storm drain lateral to pick up the sump east of Golden Oak Road. Determine the size of reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) needed to replace existing corrugated metal pipe (CMP). c) Provide a section through the flow line high point in Golden Oak Road, south of Sixth Street, to determine whether any Q100 flows will go south in Golden Oak Road. d) Provide hydrologic and hydraulic calculations. On -site storm drains shall be sized to accommodate all tributary areas in the ultimate (developed) condition. e) Revise the preliminary drainage study to reflect the Hearthside Court catch basin between nodes 15 and 16. Also include pages 8 and 9 missing from the printout for Catchment Area C. f) Determine the width of the surface overflow easement needed on Lot 14 to convey Q100 flows for the area tributary to the sump at the Springbrook Drive /Cedar Glen Place knuckle. 11) Construct all storm drains within the tract boundaries (private) and /or Fourth Street, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The developer may request a developer -to- developer reimbursement agreement, against future development within the vacant tributary area, for oversizing said facilities. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within six months of the improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. Master plan Storm drain 46M.. fee credits, if any, will be reviewed and determined by the City Engineer. No FnasteF dFalmage fees im effeet when building peFfflft We issued. 12) Replace the existing CMP in Fourth Street, between Archibald Avenue and Golden Oak Road, with appropriately sized RCP. Reconstruct both catch basins as determined by the final drainage study and install �0� E...i.I jT�t.JI�, A-! :,Nk..,i "I t.) Uki.. it. .1'A:Vi�k. i \t.:7"A 1 °i�.Cl �� " s` I. 'e ..J 1. �'. DATE: September 2, 1998 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Joseph E. Stofa Jr., Associate Engineer SUBJECT: CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM D -7, RESOLUTION NO. 98 -153 Resolution No. 98 -153, Section 1, should be amended to read as follows: Section 1: Approve the Environmental Assessment and Issuance of a Statutory Exemption for the proposed storm drain and traffic signal modification. WJO:JES:dlw Attachment RESOLUTION NO, 98 -153 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY PARTS I AND II AND ISSUANCE OF A STATUTORY EXEMPTION FOR THE PROPOSED FOOTHILL - HERMOSA STORM DRAIN INSTALLATION AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATIONS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has reviewed all available input concerning the proposed improvements, and WHEREAS, said improvements require an Environmental Assessment; and WHEREAS, the proposed construction of improvements are in conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act and State Guidelines. NOW, THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OR RANCHO CUCAMONGA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: Approve the Environmental Assessment and Issuance of a Statutory Exemption for the proposed storm drain and traffic signal modification. Section 2: Direct the City Clerk to file a Notice of Statutory Exemption pursuant to the Public Resources Code 21080 et seq, State California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15260 et seq and other provisions of state law. t i 1 Y VT iktuN% -riki 1. V%- i-i1V1V1V UL"1 MEMORANDUM DATE: September 2, 1998 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk SUBJECT: ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARING ITEM F1 Attached you will find corrected copies of paW "wd 101 pertaining to Resolution No. 98- 159. Please substitute these with what is in your agenda packet. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. AMEND. TT 15727 - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES September 2, 1998 Page 4 c) Lots 16, 227, 228, 229, and 230 shall be improved with 6 -foot - high property line walls adjacent to each drainage easement from the rear property line to a point in alignment with the front house wall nearest the property line, and with an 18 -inch high property line wall from the front property line to the beginning of the 6 -foot property line wall, All walls shall comply with an approved Master Plan of Walls, subject to Planning Commission approval, and installed prior to final inspection on each lot. d) Mini sumps shall be provided along the northerly extent of the cul -de -sacs (within a right -of -entry easement of the northern properties) at Circles "J," "I," and "H" and "F" Street (between Lots 35 and 36, 45 and 46, 55 and 56, and 65 and 66), and the northerly extent of "R" Street (rear of Lots 227, 228, 229, and 230). 4) Landscaping and irrigation shall be installed along Fourth Street in landscape easements in compliance with a Conceptual Landscape Plan previously approved by the Planning Commission for public right - of -way landscape easements. The City Planner and the City Engineer may consider and approve some reductions in the cobble hardscape work and increases in the plant material counts while maintaining the general landscaping theme planned for the north side of Fourth Street. Landscaping shall be included along the future parkway area on the west side of Golden Oak Road, between Sixth Street and the boundary of the private community, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the city Planner. The final plan shall be submitted to �.. the Design Review Committee for approval. Landscaping and irrigation shall be installed along Golden Oak Road in landscape easements to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 5) Where rear lot drainage to a public facility can be achieved along "A" Street, the lot should be lowered with a rear lot grade break and depressing the pad the maximum amount possible below the street fronting the lot. 6) Lots 35, 36, 45, 46, 55, 56, 65, and 66 shall have a minimum width of 75 feet and a minimum side yard structural setback from the out parcels to the northeast of 30 feet with RV parking accommodations. Noise attenuation features will be included in the house walls facing the out parcels to ensure interior ambient noise levels required by the Development Code. 7) Pedestrian access is to be provided from "A" Street to the adjacent cul- de -sacs. 8) A disclosure statement shall be incorporated as a deed restriction on all residential lots informing future owners of the industrial zoned land to the east of the tract on both sides of Archibald Avenue. 9) The applicant shall fully mitigate the project's school facilities impacts by entering into a mitigation agreement with the Cucamonga School District prior to the issuance of any building permits. q� CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. AMEND. TT 15727 - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES September 2, 1998 Page 7 8) Install traffic signals at Fourth Street and Golden Oak Road and at Sixth Street and Golden Oak Road. The traffic signal at Fourth Street shall be operational prior to occupancy of the 100th unit. The traffic signal at Sixth Street shall be operational prior to occupancy of the 150th unit or opening of the park, whichever occurs first. 9) Each development phase shall have two points of access and no temporary "dead end" streets shall be longer than 600 feet. 10) Prepare a final drainage study which addresses the following, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer: a) Deleted b) Substantiate that the existing facilities in Fourth Street can accommodate all flows reaching them in the ultimate (developed) condition and that Fourth Street is not adversely impacted by the lack of a storm drain lateral to pick up the sump east of Golden Oak Road. Determine the size of reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) needed to replace existing corrugated metal pipe (CMP). c) Provide a section through the flow line high point in Golden Oak Road, south of Sixth Street, to determine whether any Q100 flows will go south in Golden Oak Road. d) Provide hydrologic and hydraulic calculations. On -site storm drains shall be sized to accommodate all tributary areas in the ultimate (developed) condition. e) Revise the preliminary drainage study to reflect the Hearthside Court catch basin between nodes 15 and 16. Also include pages 8 and 9 missing from the printout for Catchment Area C. f) Determine the width of the surface overflow easement needed on Lot 14 to convey Q100 flows for the area tributary to the sump at the Springbrook Drive /Cedar Glen Place knuckle. 11) Construct all storm drains within the tract boundaries (private) and/or Fourth Street, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The developer may request a developer -to- developer reimbursement agreement, against future development within the vacant tributary area, for oversizing said facilities. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within six months of the improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. Master plan storm drain 4.. fee credits, if any, will be reviewed and determined by the City Engineer. No mesteF P1111M dMimage fees in effeet when building pefmits aFe issued 12) Replace the existing CMP in Fourth Street, between Archibald Avenue and Golden Oak Road, with appropriately sized RCP. Reconstruct both catch basins as determined by the final drainage study and install /0/ DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT €...1.I. Y t.11' tl.A�'N ,1`11.9 t. €�i1 l r . �` O R : � S..,s ..1M September 2, 1998 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Joseph E. Stofa Jr., Associate Engineer CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM D -7 RESOLUTION NO 98 -153 Resolution No. 98 -153, Section 1, should be amended to read as follows: Section 1: Approve the Environmental Assessment and Issuance of a Statutory Exemption for the proposed storm drain and traffic signal modification. WJO:JES:dlw Attachment RESOLUTION NO. 98 -153 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY PARTS I AND II AND ISSUANCE OF A STATUTORY EXEMPTION FOR THE PROPOSED FOOTHILL -HERMOSA STORM DRAIN INSTALLATION AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATIONS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has reviewed all available input concerning the proposed improvements; and WHEREAS, said improvements require an Environmental Assessment; and WHEREAS, the proposed construction of improvements are in conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act and State Guidelines. NOW, THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OR RANCHO CUCAMONGA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: Approve the Environmental Assessment and Issuance of a Statutory Exemption for the proposed storm drain and traffic signal modification. Section 2: Direct the City Clerk to file a Notice of Statutory Exemption pursuant to the Public Resources Code 21080 et seq, State California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15260 et seq and other provisions of state law.