HomeMy WebLinkAbout2004/03/17 - Agenda Packet (partial)Annual Engineer's Report
Fiscal Year 2004/2005
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Landscape Maintenance District No. 1
(General City)
ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT
Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 1
(General City)
City of Rancho Cucamonga
San Bernardino County, State of California
This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the
improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year
20004/2005, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention.
Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a
detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The
undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council.
Dated this 17th day of March, 2004.
Approved by
TABLE OF CONTENTS
OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................................. 1
SECTION 1 - DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS: ............................................. 2
SECTION 2 - ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES: ..................................... 15
SECTION 3 - METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT: ................... 16
A. GENERAL ......................... : .............................................................................................. 16
B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ......................................................................................... 16
C. ASSESSMENT ................................................................................................................... 17
SECTION 4 - ANNEXATIONS: ..................................................................................... 18
SECTION 5 - ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS: ............................................................... 19
Overview
The FY 20004/2005 Annual Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City)
is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of
the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Light Act of 1972).
Section 1 Description of Improvements
The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Assessment District consist
of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed
to be maintained, and ara attached hereto.
Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses
An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and
expenses in connection therewith for FY 20004/2005, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached
hereto.
Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment
Discuses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method
reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly
apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel.
The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within
the District for FY 20004/2005, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the
District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment
Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is
made a part of this Engineer's Report
Section 4 Annexations
List the developments, which have annexed to the Landscape Maintenance District within
Calendar year 2003.
Section 5 Assessment Diagrams
Shows the boundaries of the areas to be annexed to the Landscape Maintenance District No.
1 and the general boundaries of the District. For details regarding the boundaries and
dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within the Landscape
Maintenance District No. 1, refer to the San Bernardino County Assessor's maps.
Section I - Description of Improvements:
Landscape Maintenance District No. I (LMD #1) represents 23.63 acres of landscape area,
41.88 acres of parks and 16.66 acres of community trails, which are located at various sites
throughout the City. These sites are not considered to be associated with any one particular
area within the City, but rather benefit the entire City on a broader scale. As such, the
pamels within this district do not represent a distinct district area as do the City's remaining
LMD's. Typically parcels within this district have been annexed upon development
The various sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, paseos,
street trees, entry monuments, community trails and parks. The 41.88 acres of parks consist
of Bear Gulch Park, East and West Beryl Park, Old Town Park, Church Street Park, Golden
Oaks Park and the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center.
The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows:
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
SITE LOCATIONS
March 17, 2004
Site # Descriptive Locations
A-1 The north and south side of Wilson from Hellman to Amethyst.
Ground Cover area: 22,982 square feet
A-2 The east side of Hellman from 326 feet south of Pepperidge to 73 feet north of
Pepperidge.
Ground Cover area: 5,810 square feet
A-3 The south side of 19th Street from 62 feet east of Mayberry to 173 feet east of
Mayberry.
Ground Cover area: 1,680 square feet
A-4 The south side of Wilson from Amethyst to Archibald; the planters and cutouts on
the west side of Archibald from Wilson to 105 feet south of Cottonwood.
Ground Cover area: 5,625 square feet
A-5 The north and south side of Diamond Court from Klusman to Diamond Ave.
Ground Cover area: 3,143 square feet
A-6 The parkway on the nodh side of Wilson from 348 feet east of Morning Canyon to
Alder Ridge.
Ground Cover area: 5,700 square feet
A-7 The cutouts and vines on the south side of Wilson from the Alta Loma Channel to
240 feet east of Zapata.
Ground Cover area: 911 square feet
A-8 The east side of Broken Star from 80' south of Highland to Highland; the north side
of Highland from Amethyst to Broken Star including wood chip area north of
sidewalk, the south side of Highland from Broken Star to Amethyst; the west side of
Amethyst from 140 feet south of Highland to 265 feet south of Highland.
Ground Cover area: 16,870 square feet
A-9 The south side of Highland from Hellman to Broken Star.
Ground Cover area: 7,865 square feet
A-10 The south side of 19th from 170 feet west of Pilgrim to 167 feet east of Pilgrim.
Ground Cover area: 1,808 square feet
Site # Descriptive Locations
A-11 The east side of Amethyst from Lemon to 230 feet north of Apricot
Ground Cover area: 2,115 square feet
A-12 The west side of Sapphire from 710 feet north of Hillside to Hillside.
Ground Cover area: 4,500 square feet
A-13 The south side of Victoria from 110 feet west of London to Ramona.
Ground Cover area: 2,705 square feet
A-14 The west side of Amhibald from 273 feet north of La Gloria to Lemon; the La Gloria
median from Archibald to Jadeite; the north and south side of La Gloria from
Archibald to 53 feet east of Jadeite; the north side of Lemon from Archibald to 55
feet east of Klusman.
Ground Cover area: 12,880 square feet
A-15 The planters and cutouts on the east side of Archibald from 610 feet south of
Cottonwood to Wilson; the south side of Wilson from Archibald to Alta Loma
Channel.
Ground Cover area: 2,110 square feet
A-16 The cutouts and planters on the east side of Archibald from Banyan to 190 feet
north of Sunflower.
Ground Cover area: 1,580 square feet
A-17 The cutouts and planters on the west side of Archibald from 225 feet south of
Wilson to Banyan.
Ground Cover area: 2,362 square feet
A-18 The cutouts and planters on the north side of Banyan from Jadeite to 410 feet west
of Jadeite.
Ground Cover area: 216 square feet
A-19 The cutouts and planters on the east side of Amethyst from 192 feet south of
Sunflower to Manzanita.
Ground Cover area: 4,325 square feet
A-20 The west side of Archibald from 210 feet north of La Colina to 230 feet south of
Almond; the south side of La Colina from Archibald to Jadeite.
Ground Cover area: 17,120 square feet
A-21 The planter adjacent to the equestrian trail from Riverwood to Raspberry north of
the County flood retention basin that is west of Chaffey College.
Ground Cover area: 22,832 square feet
4
Site # Descriptive Locations
A-22 The west side of Haven from Carrari to Vista Grove.
Ground Cover area: 4,572 square feet
A-23 The west side of Haven from 434 feet north of Manzanita to 258 feet south of
Manzanita.
Ground Cover area: 48,390 square feet
Turf area: 5,868 square feet
A-24 The south side of 19th from 286 feet east of Amethyst to 166 feet west of Klusman.
Ground Cover area: 5,904 square feet
A-25 The equestrian trail and planters on the east side of Hermosa from 421 feet south of
Whispering Forest to Sun Valley.
Ground Cover area: 17,529 square feet
A-26 The west side of Haven from 630 feet north of Wilson to Wilson; the parkway on the
north side of Wilson from Haven to Mayberry; the parkway on the east side of
Mayberry from Wilson to 382 feet north of Poplar, and the east and west side of
Cartilla from Wilson to Poplar.
Ground Cover area: 35,540 square feet
A-27 The east side of Mayberry from 19th to 109 feet north of 19th; the north side of 19th
from Mayberry to 93 feet east of Castle Gate.
Ground Cover area: 5,145 square feet
A-28 The east side of Hermosa from 360 feet south of Manzanita to Manzanita, and the
south side of Manzanita from Hermosa to Raspberry.
Ground Cover area: 7,421 square feet
A-29 The south side of Wilson from 240 feet west of Timbermist to Hermosa; the west
side of Hermosa from Wilson to 213 feet south of Oak Grove.
Ground Cover area: 11,184 square feet
A-30 The equestrian trail and plant material from the curb to the tract wall on the west
side of Hermosa from 118 feet south of Hillside to 160 feet south of Waterford.
Ground Cover area: 12,132 square feet
A-31 The south side of Lemon from London to Calle Hermosa.
Ground Cover area: 4,404 square feet
A-32 The north side of Lemon from the Alta Loma Channel to London; the east side of
London from Lemon to Cypress.
Ground Cover area: 4,463 square feet
Site # Descriptive Locations
A-33 The parkway on the east side of London from 158 feet noah of Banyan to 310 feet
noah of Banyan.
Ground Cover area: 1,029 square feet
A-34 The south side of Alta Loma from Mayberry to Revere.
Ground Cover area: 2,772 square feet
There was 1,512 square feet of ground cover deleted from this site 7-1-00
A-35 The west side of Hermosa from Lemon to 125 feet noah of Highland, the parkway
on the south side of Lemon from 621 feet west of Hermosa to Hermosa.
Ground Cover area: 10,494 square feet
A-36 The south side of Lemon from 385 feet west of Mayberry to Cartilla.
Ground Cover area: 4,850 square feet
A-37 The south side of Hillside noah and south of the equestrian trail from Beryl to 203
feet east of Eastwood.
Ground Cover area: 4,900 square feet
A-38 The median in the 9200 block of Monte Vista
Ground Cover area: 500 square feet
A-39 The south side of Almond from Henry to Sapphire; the west side of Sapphire from
Almond to 255 feet south of Bella Vista.
Ground Cover area: 6,926 square feet
A-40 The parkway on the east side of Jasper from Hunter to Highland; the parkway on
the south side of Highland from Jasper to Carnelian; the west side of Carnelian from
Highland to 210 feet south of Highland.
Ground Cover area: 14,858 square feet
A-41 The west side of Sapphire from 236 feet north of Thoroughbred to Banyan.
Ground Cover area: 2,656 square feet
A-42 The parkway on the west side of Beryl from 132 feet noah of Sunflower to 23 feet
noah of Sunflower; and from Sunflower to Banyan.
Ground Cover area: 4,735 square feet
A-43 The noah side of Base Line from Topaz to the Cucamonga Creek Channel.
Ground Cover area: 4,563 square feet
A-44 The cutouts on the west side of Sapphire from Banyan to Marble.
Ground Cover area: 7,300 square feet
Site # Descriptive Locations
A-45 The mainline for this site was connected to A-46 9-8-99.
A-46 The south side of Banyan from 225 Northstar to Zircon.
Ground Cover area: 7,448 square feet
A-47 The cutouts and vines on the north side of Banyan from 180 feet east of Zimon to
186 feet west of Vineyard.
Ground Cover area: 1,300 square feet
A-48 The parkway on the west side of Beryl from 452 feet north of Cielito; 158 feet south
of Cielito and the easement between 9063 and 9073 Cielito from Cielito to 170 feet
south of Cielito.
Ground Cover area: 6,916 square feet
A-49 The east side of Carnelian from 662 feet south of Banyan to Banyan; the south side
of Banyan from Carnelian to Northstar.
Ground Cover area: 5,906 square feet
A-50 The north side of Almond from Sapphire to Crest View; the east and west side of
Skyline from Almond to 595 feet north of Almond.
Ground Cover area: 17,600 square feet
A-51' The planter adjacent to the equestrian trail; from Haven to Riven~ood, north of
County flood retention basin, west of Chaffey College. The west side of
Haven from 400 feet north of Amber
To 270 feet south of Amber.
Ground Cover area: 37,977 square feet
A-52 The east side of Riverwood, from 188 feet south of Charwood to 193 feet north of
Chanvood.
Ground Cover area: 2,750 square feet
A-53 The west side of Jasper from Hunter to Highland. The south side of Highland from
Jasper to 308 feet west of Sard. The east and westside of Sard from Highland to
Hunter.
Ground Cover area: 7,445 square feet
A-54 The west side of Beryl from 233 feet north of Mignonette to Mignonette.
Ground Cover area: 2,637 square feetMarch 17, 2004
Site # Descriptive Locations
A-55 The nodhside of 19th from Cartilla to Mayberry. The eastside of Mayberry from 19th
to Heather.
Ground Cover area: 8,410 square feet
A-56 The north and Southside of Wilson from Beryl to 731 feet west of Buckthorn. The
Westside of Beryl from 410 feet west of Buckthorn. The Westside of Beryl from 410
feet north of Wilson to 220 feet south of Wilson.
Ground Cover area: 19,708 square feet
A-57 The eastside of Hermosa From 115 north of Coca To 451 feet north of Coca. The
trail north of water retention basin from Hermosa to 619 feet east of Hermosa.
Ground Cover area: 9,406 square feet
A-58 The Westside of Haven from 510 feet south of Victoria to 1005 feet south of
Victoria.
Ground Cover area: 7,301 square feet
A-59 The eastside of Amhibald from 820 feet east of Lemon to 448 feet south of Lemon
and continues from 275 feet south of Lemon to 185 feet south of Lemon.
Ground Cover area: 4,777 square feet
A-60 The south side of Lemon from 290 feet south of Archibald to London. The West
side of London from Lemon to Orange.
Ground Cover area: 2,569 square feet
A-61 The north side of Carrari from Archibald to London.
Ground Cover area: 4,088 square feet Site not accepted as of July 18, 2002.
A-62 The eastside of Archibald from Carrari to 505 feet north of Meadowood.
Ground Cover area:2,569 square feet. Site not accepted as of July 18, 2002.
A-83 The southside of Almond street from Carriage to Almond
Ground Cover area: 4,088 square feet. Site not accepted as of July 18, 2002.
A-64 The east side of Beryl from Cottonwood to Wilson. The south side of Wilson from
Beryl to 437 feet east of Beryl. The north side of Wilson from Cousins to 474 feet
east of Cousins.
Ground Cover area: 11,973 square feet. Site not accepted as of July 18, 2002.
A-65 The eastside of Archibald from LaGIoria to 328 feet north of LaGIoria
Ground Cover area: 2,279 square feet.
A-66 The eastside of Hermosa from Watedord to 500 feet north of Waterford.
Ground Cover area: 4,695 square feet.
8
Site # Descriptive Locations
A-67 The Southside of 19th from 220 feet east of Sapphire to Via Serena.
Ground Cover area: 3,208 square feet.
B-1 The median on Blue Gum from Etiwanda to Blue Gum Court.
Ground Cover area: 5,100 square feet
B-2 The north side of 19th from Highland to Palm; the west and east side of Alameda
from 19th to Ring; the east side of Palm from 19th to Ring.
Ground Cover area: 22,550 square feet
B-3 The paseo from Sutter Ct. to Deer Creek Channel.
Ground Cover area: 294 square feet
B-4 The north side of Banyan from Deer Creek Channel to 355 feet west of
Fredericksburg.
Ground Cover area: 9,200 square feet
B-5 The north side of Lemon from Semillion to 188 'feet west of Terracina.
Ground Cover area: 14,472 square feet
B-6 The north side of Lemon from Barsac to Semillion.
Ground Cover area: 15,784 square feet
B-7 The south side of Banyan from Cabernet to 414 feet east of Cabernet.
Ground Cover area: 18,814 square feet
B-8 The south side of Banyan from Callaway to Muscat.
Ground Cover area: 10,505 square feet
B-9 The east side of Haven from Banyan to 240 feet north of Banyan; the north side of
Banyan from Haven to Merlot.
Ground Cover area: 24,975 square feet
B-10 The east side of Haven from 400 feet south of Banyan to Banyan; the south side of
Banyan from Haven to Callaway.
Ground Cover area: 14,548 square feet
B-11 The south side of Banyan from Muscat to Cabernet.
Ground Cover area: 33,282 square feet
B-12 The north side of Lemon from BarsaC to 135 feet east of Valinda.
Ground Cover area: 13,464 square feet
9
Site # Descriptive Locations
B-13 The south side of 19th from Inyo to 585 feet east of San Benito; the parkways on
the east and west side of San Benito from 19th to San Mateo; the east side of Inyo
from 19th to paseo south of 19th and the paseo running east from Inyo to Sonora.
Ground Cover area: 17,563 square feet
Turf area: 3,387 square feet
B-14 The paseo from San Benito and Sonora to the Deer Creek Channel.
Ground Cover area: 2,000 square feet
B-15 The paseo from Stanislaus and Lavine to the Deer Creek Channel.
Ground Cover area: 1,040 square feet
B-16 The paseo from inyo to Mendocino.
Ground Cover area: 225 square feet
B-17 The paseo from Yuba Ct. to Deer Creek Channel.
Ground Cover area: 918 square feet
B-18 The south side of Wilson from 377 feet west of Canistel to 1032 feet east of
Canistel.
Ground Cover area: 6,762 square feet
B-19 The east side of Haven from the Southern Pacific Railroad to 341 feet south of
Victoria.
Ground Cover area: 6,415 square feet
B-20 The east side of Haven from 341 feet south of Victoria to Victoria; the south side of
Victoria from Haven to 237 feet east of Mango.
Ground Cover area: 16,900 square feet
B-21 The south side of 19th from Valinda to Inyo.
Ground Cover area: 3,900 square feet
B-22 The south side of Lemon south of the sidewalk from 188 feet west of Terracina to
284 feet north of Marbella. The parkway on the south side of Lemon from 188 feet
west of Terracina to 517 feet north of Marbella. The turf in the parkway at the end of
the cul-de-sac on Sonterra Court. The parkway on the north side Lemon from 188
feet west of Terracina to 526 feet south of Terracina. The northside of Lemon north
of the sidewalk from 188 feet west of Terracina to 562 feet south of Terracina.
The turf in the parkway at the end of the cul-de-sac at Serena Street.
Ground Cover area: 17,688 square feet.
Turf Area: 6,390 square feet.
10
Site # Descriptive Locations
B-23 The parkway on the east side of Lemon from 129 feet south of Marbella to 526 feet
south of Terracina. The slope On the east side of Lemon east of the sidewalk from
129 feet south of Marbella to 562 feel south of Terracina. The west side of Lemon
west of the sidewalk from 284 feet north of Marbella to 129 feet south of Marbella.
The parkway on the west side of Lemon from 517 feet north of Marbella to 129 feet
south of Marbella.
Ground Cover. area: 22,531 square feet.
There was 11,844 square feet of ground cover deleted from this site 7-1-00.
B-24 The south side of Highland from 327 feet west Deer Creek Channel to Deer Creek
Channel. The paseo from Los Osos to Deer Creek Channel.
Ground Cover area: 4,946 square feet.
B-25 The south side of Banyan from 152 feet west of Cantabria to 930 feet west of
Cantabria.
Ground Cover area: 16,693 square feet.
B-26 The north side of Wilson from 590 feet west of High Meadow Place to 187 feet east
of High Meadow Place.
Ground Cover area: 3,208 square feet.
11
Site # Descriptive Locations
C-1 The north side of 26th from Andover to Hermosa; the east side of Hermosa from
26th to 331 feet north of Concord.
Ground Cover area: 12,804 square feet
Turf area: 9,423 square feet
C-2 The entry monument on the north east and northwest corners of 4th and Amhibald.
Ground Cover area: 5,860 square feet
Turf area: 426 square feet
C-3 The south side of Base Line from Ramona to 128 feet east of Cambridge.
Ground Cover area: 17,262 square feet
C-4 The south side of Base Line from 440 feet west of Ramona to Ramona.
Ground Cover area: 6,198 square feet
C-5 The south side of Base Line from 340 feet west of Center to 103 feet east of Center.
Ground Cover area: 8,850 square feet
C-6 The south side of Base Line from Ivy to 105 feet west of Marine.
Ground Cover area: 8,080 square feet
C-7 The parkway on the north side of Chumh from 142 feet east of Teak to 230 feet
west of Teak.
Ground Cover area: 1,813 square feet
C-8 The west side of Hermosa from 524 feet north of Pale Alto to 142 feet south of Pale
Alto.
Ground Cover area: 2,650 square feet
C-9 The parkway on the west side of Hermosa from 163 feet north of Ironwood to 145
feet south of Ironwood.
Ground Cover area: 1,500 square feet
C-10 The entry monument parkway on the south side of Base Line from the western city
limit to Alta Cuesta.
Ground Cover area: 9,756 square feet
12
Site # Descriptive Locations
C-11 The parkway on the east side of Beryl from Alder to 135 feet north of Culpepper.
Ground Cover area: 3,400 square feet
C-12 The parkway on the east side of Hellman from Tryon to 665 feet north of Tryon.
Ground Cover area: 8,280 square feet
C-13 The parkway on the west side of Hellman from 500 feet north of Church to Church.
Ground Cover area: 2,416 square feet
13
D-1 The east side of Rochester from Church to Base Line.
Ground Cover area: 11,126 square feet
Turf area: 16,794 square feet
D-2 The east side of Rochester from 146 feet south of Chervil to Church St.
Ground Cover area: 11,908 square feet
Turf area: 9,950 square feet
Ground cover, shrubs and turf areas that make up parkways, median islands and
paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company.
Parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews.
t4
Section 2 - Estimate of Costs and Expenses:
The budgeted costs for LMD #1 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover,
shrubs and the neighborhood park. These functions, along with tree maintenance and
certain irrigation system repair and testing, are performed through a Contract Services
Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The
projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #1 are as follows:
Personnel
Regular Payroll $53,720.00
Part-time Salaries $35,030.00
Fringe Benefits $21,360.00
Subtotal Personnel $110,110.00
Operations
Maintenance and Operations
Landscaping $64,520.00
Facilities $16,000.00
Vehicle Maintenance and Operations $3,000.00
Emergency & Routine Vehicle Equipment Rental $1,000.00
Equipment Maintenance $4,800.00
Utilities
Water Utilities $154,000.00
Telephone Utilities $3,500.00
Electric Utilities $45,000.00
Contract Services
Parkway & Median Landscape Maintenance $423,920.00
Park Landscape Maintenance $183,700.00
Tree Maintenance $54,300.00
CCWD Manditory Annual Backflow Cert. $4,500.00
Contract Services - Facilities $19,000.00
Subtotal Operations $977,240.00
Capital Expenditures
Outlay/Equipment $4,325.00
Subtotal Capital Expenditures $4,325.00
Capital Project $40,000.00
$40,000.00
Assessment Administration and General Overhead $130,890.00
Total LMD #1 Expenditure Budget $1,262,565.00
Less Prior Year District Carryover $180,296.23
Assessment Revenue Required $1,082,268.77
Section 3 - Method of Assessment Apportionment:
A. General
The 1972 Act permits the establishments of assessment districts for the
purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction,
maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The
1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to
benefit rather than assessed value:
"The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may
be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount
among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be
received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements."
The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects
the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly
apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel.
Assessment Methodology
Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to
relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent
Dwelling Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit
of assessment. A single family home equals one The Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU).
Every other land-use is converted to EDU's based on an assessment formula that
equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use),
and size of the property, as compared to a single-family home (SFR).
The EDU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most
appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts
formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are
apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table
provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each
parcel's EDU.
LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS
Property Type EDU Value Multiplier
Non-Residential Improved 2,00 Acres
Single Family Residential 1.00 Unit
]6
It is recommended that the rate per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU.) remain at $92.21
for the FY 20004/2005, The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the
district:
# of # of Rate per
Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
Land Use Type Units Unit Factor Units Unit Revenue
Single Family Pamel 8033 1.0 8033 $92.21 $740,722.93
Multi-Family Pamel 7404 0.5 3702 $92.21 $341,361.42
Comm/Ind Parcel 2 1.0 2 $92.21 $184.42
Total $1,082,268.77
C. Assessment
All assessed lots or pamels within the District are listed on the assessment
role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and hereby
made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the
net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal
Year 20004/2005, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the
District, These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County
assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor
and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report.
t7
Section 4 - Annexations:
Calendar Year 2003 Annexations
Landscape Maintenance District No. I
PROJECT UNITS ANNEX DATE
DR 00-60 96 MF 1/15/2003
PM 15970 2 SF 4/16/2003
TR 16237 8 SF 6/8/2003
TR 16332 22 SF 6/18/2003
PM 16058 2 SF 7/2/2003
TR 16344 18 SF 8/16/2003
TR 16262 15 SF 8/20/2003
TR 16431 15 SF 11/19/2003
DRC 2002-00601 168 MF 11/19/2003
Section 5 - Assessment Diagrams:
Landscape Maintenance District 1
I--IILLSIC>E
,SITE
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE'MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 2
LMD
HILLSIDE ROAD
~~7 Z / ~7~ / ~ ~.
COUNTY OF SAN BE~A~INO
STATE OF CALIFO~IA
FOOTHILL ( ROUTE: 66 ) BOU~LL-VARD
City of Item: Staff Report
Rancho Cucamonga Title: Vicinity Map
ENGINEERING
DIVISION EXHIBIT: #~ (DR°O-60)
'LF- GEND ~Fsv
i[,,000 Lu~ .~.--
,.-~ ST~-T L~
NO
CITY OF
Parcel Nap 15970
RANCHO CUCAMONGA 'rrr~.~_- y/till-my
ENG~G DIVISION ExIrmlT:
/)/
EXHIBIT "A"-- ~.
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
~ LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. i
STREE'1~ LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 2
ST~-.£ET Z./CTt-/T$ /
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NORTll
couNTY or SAN .E~*R~iNO /P4
Vicinity Map ~
NORTH
~2ITY OF ITEM:
RANCHO CUCAMONGA i~iTLE: ~
ENGINEERING DIVISION EXHIBIT: ~
Vicinity Map
MAIN
METROLINK
PM 16058
8838 REID AVE.
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA Trm.~._. I//c//,,//--r"r'/'.'/~P
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAI'NTENANCE DISTRICT NO.
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 2
TM/I.
OOIffIvlU~41TY' '7-1e~lZ._ ~0o0 DerSF
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Vicinity Map
Nor Y~ $CA~£
t oc4 rloN
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA Tnn,~: VIc//~ITY hfS?
ENGn~.~.~G I~IVISION F_,XI~IT: ~
F.~HIBIT "A" ~' ~
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 2
o°T,e.L~ET L/ q/-/-f'~ /75_A.
,S77z. t~l~T T~e~' $
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NORTII
COUNTY OF SAN BI~.RNARDINO y/
Vicinity Map
FERON
MAIN
METROLINK
PM 16057
N 9835 FERON BLVD.
Vicinity Map
BASE LI I
TRACT 16344
/37
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
CITY OF ~: ;zF. ACT flAP' 1~4-$I
RANCHO CUCAMONGA Trr[.~.._ WCl/qlT)" ?ffAF
ENGINR. RRING DIVISION EXPI~RIT: ~
r F-~(HIBIT "A"- Z.
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT'NOS. ! AND 2
$T, eEET Ll6kll'$ ~
A
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NORT.
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ~/
~ REDHILL COOt, ffRY CLUB
~/. str~ ~ N.T.S.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
VICINITY MAP.
DRc2002_O0601 ........... ,,.,
8250 VINEYARD AVENUE 1.2.[
! ~ COUN/~ CLUB .
~ N.T.S.
Exhibit A-2
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA VICINITY MAP
DRC2002-00601 ! 2 ~
Annexation to LMD 1, SLMD 1 and SLMD 2
Vicinity Map
DRC2002-00306
N
S
Proposed Additions to Work Program
For DRC2002-00306
3 Streetlights, existing
- 19 Street Tre~es, proposed
TUTOR TIME LEARNING CENTER
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
Al~a Loma Drive
Annual Engineer's Report
Fiscal Year 2004/2005
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Landscape Maintenance District No. 2
(Victoria Planned Community)
ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT
Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 2
(Victoria Planned Community)
City of Rancho Cucamonga
San Bernardino County, State of California
This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the
improvements, budgets, pamels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year
2004/2005, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention.'
Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a
detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The
undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council.
Dated this 17th day of March, 2004·
Approved b~~/,,.('~
William J. O'Neii~ty I~ngineer
li
TABLE OF CONTENTS
OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................................. 1
SECTION 1 - DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS: ............................................. 2
SECTION 2 - ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES: .......................................
SECTION 3 - METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT: .....................
A. G~NERAL .......................................................................................................................... 6
B. ASS~$$M~TM~THODOLOG¥ ........................................................................................... 6
C. ASSESSMENT ..................................................................................................................... 7
SECTION 4 - ANNEXATIONS: ....................................................................................... 8
SECTION 5 - ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS: ................................................................. 9
III
Overview
The FY 2004/2005 Annual Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Victoria
Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1,
Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and
Light Act of 1972).
Section 1 Description of Improvements
The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Assessment District consist
of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed
to be maintained, and are attached hereto.
Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses
An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and
expenses in connection therewith for FY 2004/2005, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached
hereto.
Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment
Discuses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method
reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly
apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel.
The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within
the District for FY 2004/2005, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the
District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment
Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is
made a part of this Engineer's Report
Section 4 Annexations
List the developments, which have annexed to the Landscape Maintenance District within
Calendar year 2003.
Section 5 Assessment Diagrams
Shows the boundaries of the areas to be annexed to the Landscape Maintenance District No.
2 and' the general boundaries of the District. For details regarding the boundaries and
dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within the Landscape
Maintenance District No. 2, refer to the San Bernardino County Assessor's maps.
Section I - Description of Improvements:
Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (LMD #2) represents landscape sites throughout the
Victoria Planned Community. These sires are associated with areas within Victoria and as
such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those
pamels within that community. Because of this, assessments required for this district are
charged to those pamels within that planned community.
The sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, street trees, paseos,
community trails and parks. The 32.37 acres of parks in Victoria consist of Kenyon Park,
Victoria Groves Park, Vintage Park, Windrows Park and Ellena Park
The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows:
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2
SITE LOCATIONS
Site # Descriptive Locations
VW-1 Base Line median from Victoria Park Lane to 830 feet west of Victoria Park Lane.
Ground Cover area: 4,514 square feet
VW-2 The north side of Base Line, 300 feet east and west of Swanson; the east and west
sides of Swanson from Base Line to Province; the paseo from the intersection of
Swanson and Province to Atwood with outlet to Dunmore; the paseo from Atwood to
the Southern Pacific Railroad; the north side of Saratoga from Powell to Dunmore;
the paseo from Saratoga to Etiwanda; the south side of Atwood from Victoria Park
Lane to Travis; the north side of Atwood from Walcott to Victoria Park Lane.
Ground Cover area: 18,753 square feet
Turf area: 73,931 square feet
VW-3 The Victoria Park Lane median and the west and east side parkways from Base
Line to the entrance to Victoria Village.
Ground Cover area: 24,453 square feet
Turf area: 2,637 square feet
VW-4 The Victoria Park Lane median and the west and east side parkways from Victoria
Village entrance to Atwood.
Ground Cover area: 30,695 square feet
Turf area: 10,242 square feet
2
VW-5 The Victoria Park Lane median and the west side and east side parkways from
Atwood to the Southern Pacific Railroad.
Ground Cover area: 49,513 square feet
VW-6 The paseo running north from 12732 Farrington to the Southern Pacific Railroad.
Ground Cover area: 285 square feet
VW-7 The paseo running north from 12840 Farrington to the Southern Pacific Railroad.
Ground Cover area: 266 square feet
VW-8 The Victoria Park Lane median and the west side parkway from the Southern
Pacific Railroad to South Victoria Windrows Loop. The Victoria Park Lane east side
parkway from the Southern Pacific Railroad to Zinnia Ct.
Ground Cover area: 40,548 square feet
Site # Descriptive Locations
V~V-9 The Victoria Park Lane east side parkway from Barberry to North Victoria Windrows
Loop at Windrows Park.
Ground Cover area: 91188 square feet
Turf area: 3,851 square feet
VW-10 The west side of Victoria Park Lane from South Victoria Windrows Loop to Dahlia
Ct.; the Victoria Park Lane median from Zinnia Ct., to Dahlia Ct.; and the east side
of Victoria Park Lane from North Victoria Windrows Loop at Windrows Park to
Dahlia Ct.
Ground Cover area: 27,398 square feet
Turf area: 37,350 square feet
VW-11 The east side parkway on South Victoria Windrows Loop from Silktassel to Victoria
Park Lane; the parkway on the south side of Victoria Park Lane from the
intersection of South Victoria Windrows Loop and North Victoria Windrows Loop to
Dahlia Ct.; the Victoria Park Lane median from the intersection of North and South
Victoria Windrows Loop to Dahlia Ct.; and the parkway on the north side of Victoria
Windrows Loop from the intersection of North and South Victoria Windrows Loop to
Dahlia Ct..
Ground Cover area: 23,082 square feet
Turf area: 241187 square feet
VW-12 The Victoria Park Lane median from the intersection of North and South Victoria
Windrows Loop west to the tract wall; the parkway on the north side of Victoria Park
Lane from the intersection of North and South Victoria Windrows Loop, west to the
tract wall; the parkway on the west side of north Victoria Windrows Loop from
Silverberry to Victoria Park Lane and; the parkway on the south side of Silverberry
from the wall to North Victoria Windrows Loop.
Ground Cover area: 149,010 square feet
Turf area: 38,842 square feet
VW-13 The parkway on the south side of Victoria Park Lane from the west tract wall to
South Victoria Windrows Loop; and the west side of South Victoria Windrows Loop
from Victoria Park Lane to Snapdragon.
Ground Cover area: 20,068 square feet
Turf area: 16,476 square feet
VW-14 The parkway on the west side of South Victoria Windrows Loop from Snapdragon to
Victoria Park Lane; the parkway on the north and south side of Sugargum from
South Victoria Windrows Loop to the wall; the parkways on the east and west sides
of Basswood from Sugargum to Blazing Star; and the parkway on the north side of
South Victoria Windrows Loop from Victoria Park Lane to Silktassel.
Ground Cover area: 21,466 square feet
Turf area: 101335 square feet
4
Site # Descriptive Locations
VW-15 The parkway on the north side of Bougainvillea Way from Peach to North Victoria
Windrows Loop; the parkway on the east side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from
Bougainvillea Way and following that curb line to Citrus. The parkway on the north
side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Locust and following that curb line to
Silverberry; the parkway on the north side of Silverberry from North Victoria
Windrows Loop to the tract wall; the paseo from North Victoria Windrows Loop at
Silverberry to Nasturtium; and the paseo from North Victoria Windrows Loop at
Locust to Pistachio and continuing to Bougainvillea.
Ground Cover area: 45,929 square feet
Turf area: 12,207 square feet
VW-16 The south side of Highland from 563 feet west of Locust to 534 feet east of Locust.
The east and west side of Locust from Highland to North Victoria Windrows Loop.
The parkway on the south side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Citrus east to
Bougainvillea Ct.; the parkway on the north side of North Victoria Windrows Loop
from Twinspur to Locust.
Ground Cover area: 27,068 square feet
Turf area: 34,081 square feet
VW-17 This site was modified and added to VW-16, 1-5-99.
VW-18 The south side of Highland from 12583 Highland, the Polka Palace to Rockrose.
Ground Cover area: 2,800 square feet
Turf area: 8,515 square feet
VW-19 The north side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Rosemary to Rockrose; the
east side of Rockrose from North Victoria Windrows Loop to Highland; the south
side of Highland from Rockrose to Etiwanda; and the horse trail from Highland and
Etiwanda to the Fire Station.
Ground Cover area: 21,027 square feet
Turf area: 32,266 square feet
VW-20 The parkway on the south side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Victoria Park
Lane to Plum; the paseo from Tipu east to the open field; and the parkway on the
west side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Plum Way to Rosemary Ct.
Note: The area in front of Windrows Park is watered by VW-20 water meter, but is
maintained by City crews.
Ground Cover area: 2,110 square feet
Site # Descriptive Locations
VW-21 The east side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Rosemary Ct., to the trail south
of Kalmia St.; the trail and paseo from North Victoria Windrows Loop south of
Kalmia St., to Etiwanda Ave., and north to the Fire Station; and the south side of
Basil St., from North Victoria Windrows Loop to Santolina PI.
Ground Cover area: 49,187 square feet
Turf area: 57,532 square feet
VW-22 The paseo from North Victoria Windrows Loop at Rockrose to the north east corner
of Windrows Park and from that corner to Plum.
Ground Cover area: 13,689 square feet
Turf area: 19,953 square feet
VW-23 The west side of Rockrose from Highland to North Victoria Windrows Loop; the
parkway on the north side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Rockrose to
Twinspur; and the parkway on the south side of Nodh Victoria Windrows Loop from
Bougainvillea Ct., to Rosemary.
Ground Cover area: 18,299 square feet
Turf area: 3,425 square feet
VW-24 The M.W.D. easement from Jasmine and Ironbark to Sweet Gum Dr.
Ground Cover area: 475 square feet
Turf area: 4,730 square feet
VW-25 The north side of Baseline from from 384 feet west of Wanona to Etiwanda. The
west side of Etiwanda from Baseline to Craig.
Ground Cover area: 20,934 square feet
Turf area: 3,079 square feet
VW-26 The Paseo from Grape to 630 feet west of Grape.
Ground Cover area 7,021 square feet
VW-27 The southside of Baseline from 251 feet west of Swanson to Etiwanda.
Ground Cover area 16,149 square feet
6
Site # Descriptive Locations
VG-1 The turf and ground cover on the south side of Highland from the Deer Creek
Channel to Fairmont; the turf and ground cover from Highland on the west side of
Fairmont to Victoria Park Lane; the ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park
Lane south of the horse trail; from 475 feet east of Milliken to Fairmont; the turf on
the north side of Victoria Park Lane from 275 feet east of Milliken to Fairmont; the
turf in the parkway on the east side of Fairmont from Victoria Park Lane to Highland.
Ground Cover area: 21,573 square feet
Turf area: 47,604 square feet
VG-2 The turf on the east side of York from Delaware to Fairmont; the ground cover on
the south side of Fairmont from York Place and continuing on that curb line to
Victoria Park Lane; the turf and ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park
Lane, west of Milliken, from Fairmont to Milliken; the parkway on the west side of
Milliken from Victoria Park Lane to Fairmont; the Milliken median from Fairmont to
Victoria Park Lane; the turf on the nodh side of Victoria Park Lane from 273 feet
west of Milliken to Milliken; the ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park Lane,
south of the horse trail, from 468 feet west of Milliken to Milliken.
Ground Cover area: 29,395 square feet
Turf area: 73,608 square feet
VG-3 The turf and ground cover, north of the sidewalk, on the north side of Fairmont from
Nova Ct., and continuing on that curb line to York PI.; and the turf south of the
sidewalk on the north side of Fairmont from Armstrong PI., and continuing on that
curb line to York PI.; the ground cover on the west side of York PI., from Fairmont to
Delaware and the ground cover on the east side of York PI.; the turf and ground
cover on the west side of Fairmont from Emerson continuing along that curb line to
Armstrong PI.; the turf and ground cover on the east and west sides of Biola PI.
Ground Cover area: 57,189 square feet
Turf area: 38,343 square feet
VG-4 The turf and ground cover on the south side of Fairmont from Armstrong to Milliken;
the turf and ground cover on the west side of Milliken from Fairmont to the Southern
Pacific Railroad; the Milliken median from Fairmont to the Southern Pacific Railroad;
the ground cover on the north side of the Southern Pacific Railroad from Deer
Creek Channel to Rochester, including the paseo to Baylor; the ground cover on the
north side of Fairmont from Milliken to Nova Ct.; the turf on the north side of
Fairmont from Milliken to Armstrong.
Ground Cover area: 197,763 square feet
Turf area: 24,151 square feet
VG-5 The paseo from Biola at Amarillo to Delaware at York.
Ground Cover area: 12,448 square feet
Turf area: 44,896 square feet
7
Site # Descriptive Locations
VG-6 The paseo beginning at the northeast corner of Victoria Groves park and Fairmont
and extending to the Deer Creek Channel.
Ground Cover area: 73,442 square feet
Turf area: 74,778 square feet
VG-7 The paseo that begins on the south side of Donnelly at Fairmont and continues to
the Deer Creek Channel including the southward extension on the west side of
Albright from Donnelly to Pacific and the paseo from Pacific to Charleston.
Ground Cover area:43,427 square feet
Turf area: 51,765 square feet
VG-8 The ground cover on the west side of Milliken from 566 feet north of Victoria Park
Lane to Victoria Park Lane; the ground cover and turf north of the horse trail on
Victoria Park Lane from Milliken to Fairmont; the ground cover on the east side of
Fairmont from Victoria Park Lane to 156 feet north of Victoria Park Lane.
Ground Cover area:21,614 square feet
Turf area: 8,614 square feet
VG-9 The ground cover on the east side of Fairmont from 156 feet north of Victoria Park
Lane to Kenyon Way; the ground cover on the south side of Kenyon from Fairmont
to 197 feet east of Fairmont; the turf on the south side of Kenyon from Fairmont to
316 feet east of Fairmont; the turf and ground cover on the south side of Baltimore
Drive from Fairmont to Baltimore Court; the turf and ground cover on the north side
of Baltimore Drive from Fairmont to Vanderbilt; the turf and ground cover on the
east side of Vanderbilt from Baltimore to Brown; the paseo from Vanderbilt and
Brown to Kenyon.
Ground Cover area:48,481 square feet
Turf area: 11,357 square feet
VG-10 The ground cover on the south side of Kenyon from 197 feet east of Fairmont to
Milliken; the turf on the south side of Kenyon from 316 feet east of Fairmont to
Milliken; the ground cover on the west side of Milliken from Kenyon to 566 feet north
of Victoria Park Lane; the turf and ground cover on the west side of Capitol from
Brown to Bethany; the paseo from Capitol and Brown to Kenyon.
Ground Cover area: 34,241 square feet
Turf area: 11,031 square feet
VG-11 The tud on the west side of Milliken from the Southern Pacific Railroad to Base
Line.
Turf area: 13,180 square feet
This site was reduced on 4-1-2002 by 25,718 sq. fl. of turf and 3,037 sq. fl. of
ground cover.
8
Site # Descriptive Locations
VG-12 The tud and ground cover on the south side of Fairmont from the southeast corner
of Milliken and Fairmont along that curb line to Victoria Park Lane; the turf and
ground cover on the west side of Fairmont from the southwest corner of Victoria
Park Lane and Fairmont (located east of Milliken) and continuing along that curb
line to Milliken; the turf on the east side of Milliken from the Southern Pacific
Railroad to 730 feet south of Victoria Park Lane; the ground cover on the east side
of Milliken from the Southern Pacific Railroad to 766 feet south of Victoria Park
Lane.
Ground Cover area: 53,068 square feet
Turf area: 36,431 square feet
VG-13 The paseo from Victoria Park Lane to Verona; from Verona to Napoli and Genova
and to Tivoli.
Ground Cover area: 17,993 square feet
Turf area: 16,344 square feet
VG-14 Base Line median from Milliken to Ellena East; the turf and ground cover on the
north side of Base Line from Ellena East to Ellena West; the turf and ground cover
on the east side of Ellena West from Base Line and following that curb line to
Kenyon; the north side of Ellena West from Kenyon to Casoli; the turf and ground
cover on both sides of Casoli from Ellena West to Candela; the turf and ground
cover on both sides of Crema Place from Ellena west to Candela.
Ground Cover area: 79,948 square feet
Turf area: 62,999 square feet
VG-15 The turf and ground cover on the west side of Rochester from the Railroad tracks to
Base Line; the turf and ground cover on the north side of Base Line from Rochester
to Ellena East; the Base Line Median from Rochester to Ellena East; the turf and
ground cover on the east side of Ellena east from Base Line and continuing along
that curb line to 275 feet north of Berra Road; the turf and ground cover on both
sides of Berra from Ellena East to Comiso.
Ground Cover area: 58,588 square feet
Turf area: 57,306 square feet
VG-16 The paseo from Base Line to Ellena West with entrances to Amelia and Payola.
Ground Cover area: 9,661 square feet
Turf area: 11,529 square feet
VG-17 The paseo from Fairmont to the Southern Pacific Railroad; the paseo from Fabriano
to Martano.
Ground Cover area: 35,351 square feet
Turf area: 40,291 square feet
VG-18 The paseo from Rapallo to Gandino and south to the Southern Pacific Railroad.
Site # Descriptive Locations
Ground Cover area: 4,281 square feet
VG-19 The paseo from Tolentino to Pizolli and to Tolentino.
Ground Cover area: 12,555 square feet
Turf area: 17,856 square feet
VG-20 The turf on the east side of Milliken from 730 feet south of Victoria Park Lane to
Victoria Park Lane; the ground cover on the east side of Milliken from 766 feet south
of Victoria Park Lane to Victoria Park Lane; the turf and ground cover on the south
side of Victoria Park Lane from the southeast corner at Milliken heading east to
Fairmont; the turf and ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from
Parma to the northeast corner of Milliken and Victoria Park Lane; the ground cover
on the west side of Parma from Victoria Park Lane median from Milliken to Pandio
Ct.; the Milliken median from Victoria Park Lane to 440 feet south of Kenyon; the
parkway on the west side of Milliken from 420 feet south of Kenyon to Victoria Park
Lane.
Ground Cover area: 76,232 square feet
Turf area: 97,979 square feet
VG-21 The ground cover on the east side of Parma; the ground cover on the north side of
Victoria Park Ln, from Parma to 653 feet east of Kenyon; the turf on the north side
of Victoria Park Lane from Parma to 653 feet east of Kenyon; the turf on the north
side of Victoria Park Lane from Parma to 547 feet east of Kenyon; the turf and
ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park Lane from Fairmont to 422 feet east
of Kenyon; the turf and ground cover on the east and west sides of Kenyon from
Victoria Park Lane to the Southern Pacific Railroad; the paseo from Kenyon to
Rapallo; the paseo from Kenyon to Bari; the Victoria Park Lane median from
Pandino Ct. to Portofino Ct.
Ground Cover area: 69,167 square feet
Turf area: 58,692 square feet
VG-22 The ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from 653 feet east of
Kenyon to Rochester; the turf on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from 547 feet
east of Kenyon to Rochester; the Victoria Park Lane median from Portofino Ct., to
Rochester Ave.; the turf and ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park Lane
(north of sidewalk) from Kenyon to the east side of Vintage Park; the turf and
ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park Lane from the east side of Vintage
Park to Rochester; the turf and ground cover on the west side of Rochester from
Victoria Park Lane to the Southern Pacific Railroad.
Ground Cover area: 83,397 square feet
Turf area: 89,674 square feet
10
VG-23 The turf and ground cover on the east side of Kenyon from Victoria Park
Lane to 409 feet west of Grimaldi; the ground cover on the south side of
Portofino from Kenyon to Bergano; the turf and ground cover on the north
and south side of Lark from Kenyon to the west side of Rancho Cucamonga
High School; the ground cover on the east and west side of Matera from
Lark to Pescara; the ground cover on the north and south side of Grimaldi,
from Kenyon to Brindisi; the turf and ground cover on the west side of
Kenyon from Lark to Victoria Park Lane; the ground cover on the north and
south side of Mamello from Kenyon to Landriano. The paseo from southwest
corner of Kenyon Park to Kenyon. The paseo from south west corner of
Kenyon Park to Kenyon.
Ground Cover area: 63,733 square feet
Turf area: 82,565 square feet
VG-24 The north side of Kenyon from Autumn Glen court to Woodruff. The east
side of Woodruff from Kenyon to 403 feet north of Kenyon.
Ground Cover area: 8,447 square feet
Turf area: 5,320 square feet
VG-25 The paseo west of Torino from Kenyon to Highland; the turf and ground
cover on the south side of Highland from the northwest corner of Tract
13440 to the east end of Tract 13440.
Ground Cover area: 40,800 square feet
Turf area: 24,134 square feet
VG-26 The paseo from Brindisi Ct., to Messina; the turf and ground cover on the
north side of Brindisi Ct., to the end of the cul-de-sac; the turf and ground
cover on the west side of Messina from the paseo to Treviso Way.
Ground Cover area: 18,905 square feet
Turf area: 1,141 square feet
VG-27 The Milliken median from 440 feet south of Kenyon to Highland; the parkway
on the west side of Milliken from 420 feet south of Kenyon to Kenyon.
Ground Cover area: 4,030 square feet
Turf area: 3,006 square feet
Reduced 1,670 square feet of G.C. on 7-1-00
VG-28 The east side of Rochester from Victoria Park Lane to Highland.
Ground Cover area: 60,902 square feet
VG-29 The southside of Highland from Fairmont to Milliken. The westside of
Milliken from Highland Kenyon. The Norhtside of Kenyon from Milliken to
Fairmont. The Groundcover on the eastside of Fairmont, east of sidewalk, from
Kenyon to Highland.
Ground Cover area: 36,506 square feet
Turf area: 16,877 square feet
Reduced 18,940 of turf on 7-1-00
VG-30 The southside of Tresenda from Santo to Sapada. The paseo from Sapada
to Carano. The southside of Montella from Carano to Trivento.
Ground Cover area: 6,797 square feet
Turf area: 2,462 square feet
VG-31 The eastside of Brienza from Larino to Letini.The westside of Tindari from
Letini to Larino. The Greenbelt on the southside of Marconi from Trivento to
Comisco. The Eastside of Comisco from Scalea to Santo.
Ground Cover area: 23,419 square feet
Turf area: 18,351 square feet
VG-32 The north side of Candela from Terini to Bettoloa. Ground Cover
area:
20,172 square feet
Turf area: 8,190 square feet
VG-33 The paseo from the Sapri to Railroad.
Ground Cover area: 894 square feet
VG-34 The paseo from Bronte to Railroad.
Ground Cover area: 894 square feet
VG-35 The east side of Rochester from 555 feet south of Palmi to Victoria Park
Lane. The south
side of Victoria Park Lane and median from Rochester to east side of Deer
Creek Channel.
Ground Cover area: 53,646 square feet
Turf area: 11,150 square feet
VG-36 The north side of Victoria Park Lane from the east side of Deer Creek
Channel to Rochester.
Ground Cover area: 55,780 square feet
Turf area: 10,500 square feet
VG-37 The paseo at the end of Armadore.
Ground Cover area: 1,350 square feet
VG-38 The eastside of Milliken from 106' feet north of Victoria Park Lane to Kenyon.
The north & south of Spring Mist Drive From Milliken to Summerstone. The
south side of Kenyon from Milliken to Kenyon Park.
Ground Cover area: 28,051 square feet
Turf area: 4,533 square feet
VG-39 The north side of Victoria Park Lane from Kenyon paseo to 132' east of
Milliken. The Kenyon Paseo outlet from Victoria Park Lane to FainNinds
Court. The Paseo from Victoria Park Lane to southwest corner of Kenyon
Park.
Ground Cover area: 55,089 square feet
Turf area: 13,120 square feet
VG-40 The south side of Highland from 413 feet west of Highland paseo to
Highland paseo. The east side of Highland paseo from Highland to Kenyon.
The north side of Kenyon from Highland paseo to Autumn Glen Court.
Ground Cover area: 56,553 square feet
VG-41 The Westside of Rochester from 294 feet south of Highland to Lark. The
north side of Lark From Rochester to 1230 feet west of Rochester.
Ground Cover area: 31,413 square feet
VG-42 The southside of Highland from 1314 feet west of Rochester to Rochester.
The west side of Rochester from Highland to 294 feet south of Highland.
Ground Cover area: 18,464 square feet
VG-43 The north side of Victoria Park Lane and the median from Day Creek Blvd. to
Day Creek Channel. The east and west side of Kensington Place from
Victoria Park Lane to Stratford Drive.
Ground Cover area: 70,669 square feet
Turf area: 7,888 square feet
VG-44 The west side of Day Creek Blvd. from 572 feet north of Silverberry to day
Creek Blvd. The south side of Silverberry from Kensington to Day Creek
Blvd.
Ground Cover area: 36,835 square feet
VG-45 The West side of Milliken from Freeway to Kenyon. Not accepted as of
July 22, 2002.
VG-46 The Baseline Median from 657 feet east of Virginia Drive to Rochester. The
north side of Baseline from 278 feet east of Virginia to Rochester. The outlet
at Huntley. The east side of Rochester from Baseline to 105 feet north of
Shenandoah.
Ground Cover area: 33,135 square feet
VG-47 The north side of Baseline from 400 feet east of Day Creek Blvd. to Day
Creek Blvd.
Ground Cover area: 3,243 square feet
VG-48 The East side of Day Creek Blvd. And median from Baseline to Victoria Park
Lane. The south side of Victoria Park Lane from Day Creek Blvd. to 390 feet
east of Day Creek Bird
Ground Cover area: 50,318 square feet
VG-49 The north side of Victoria Park Lane and median from 390 feet east of Day
Creek Bird to Day Creek Blvd. The east side of Day Creek Bird and median
from Victoria Park Lane to Highland. The south side of Highland from Day
Creek Blvd. to 440 feet east of Day Creek Blvd.
Ground Cover area: 51,549 square feet
Turf area: 3,930 square feet
VG-50 The westside of San Carmela from 389 feet north of Baseline to Baseline.
The north side of Baseline from San Carmela to 264 feet west of Durness.
Ground Cover area: 18,043 square feet
VG-51 Paseo south of Saxon to Railroad right away.
Ground Cover area: 1,398 square feet
VG~52 The north side of Sugar Gum from Day Creek Blvd. to Kensington. The
south side of Sugar Gum from Day Creek Blvd. to 111 feet east of Suffolk.
Ground Cover area: 4,362 square feet
VG-53 The southside of Victoria Park Lane from 296 feet west of Kensington to
Milliken. The west side of Day Creek Blvd. from Victoria Park Lane to 397
feet south of Sugar Gum.
Ground Cover area: 28,532 square feet
Turf area: 11,070 square feet
Ground cover, shrubs and tud areas that make up parkways, median islands and
paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company.
Parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews.
4
Section 2 - Estimate of Costs and Expenses:
The budgeted costs for LMD #2 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover,
shrubs and the neighborhood park. These functions, along with tree maintenance and
certain irrigation system repair and testing, are performed through a Contract Services
Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The
projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #2 are as follows:
Personnel
Regular Payroll $547,620.00
Overtime Salaries $1,000.00
Part-time Salaries $27,300.00
Fringe Benefits $205,060.00
Subtotal Personnel $780,980.00
Operations
Maintenance and Operations
Landscaping $65,900.00
Facilities $8,000.00
Vehicle Maintenance and Operations $22,560.00
Emergency & Routine Vehicle Equipment Rental $1,000.00
Equipment Maintenance $15,140.00
Utilities
Water Utilities $323,000.00
Telephone Utilities $1,790.00
Electric Utilities $33,000.00
Contract Services
Parkway & Median Landscape Maintenance $960,550.00
Park Landscape Maintenance $47,500.00
Tree Maintenance $46,000.00
CCWD Manditory Annual Backflow Cert. $3,500.00
Contract Services - Facilities $11,000.00
Subtotal Operations $1,538,940.00
Capital Expenditures
Outlay/Building Improvements $5,000.00
Outlay/Equipment $1,500.00
Subtotal Capital Expenditures $6,500.00
Assessment Administration and General Overhead $193,190.00
Total LMD #2 Expenditure Budget $2,519,610.00
Less Prior Year District Carryover $62,627.88
Assessment Revenue Required $2,456,982.12
Section 3 - Method of Assessment Apportionment:
A. General
The 1972 Act permits the establishments of assessment districts for the
purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction,
maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The
1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to
benefit rather than assessed value:
"The net amount to be assessed upon/ands within an assessment district may
be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount
among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be
received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements."
The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects
the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly
apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel.
B. Assessment Methodology
Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to
relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent
Dwelling Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit
of assessment. A single family home equals one The Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU).
Every other land-use is converted to EDU's based on an assessment formula that
equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use),
and size of the property, as compared to a single-family home (SFR).
The EDU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most
appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts
formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are
apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table
provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each
parcel's EDU.
LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS
Property Type EDU Value Multiplier
Non-Residential Improved 2.00 Acres
Vacant 0.25 Acres
Multi-Family 1.00 Unit
Single Family Residential 1.00 Unit
It is recommended that the rate per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU.) remain at
$422.00 for the FY 2004/2005. The following table summarizes the assessment rate
for the district:
# of # of Rate per
Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
Land Use Type Unit Type Unit Factor Units Unit Revenue
Single Family Parcel 5501 1.00 5501 $422.00 $2,321,422.00
Multi-Family Parcel 124 1.00 124 $422.00 $52,328.00
Comm/Ind Acre 56.37 2.00 112.74 $422.00 $47,576.28
Vacant Acre 337.97 0.25 84.4925 $422.00 $35,655.84
Total $2,456,982.12
C. Assessment
All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment
role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and hereby
made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the
net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal
Year 2004/2005, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the
District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County
assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor
and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report.
Section 4 - Annexations:
Calendar Year 2003 Annexations
Landscape Maintenance District No. 2
PROJECT UNITS ANNEX DATE
PM 15781 12.19 AC 11/20/2002
TR 16312 81 SF 6/4/2003
TR 16253 10 SF 6/4/2003
TR 16314 42 SF 7/16/2003
TR 16313 48 SF 7/16/2003
TR 16369 37 SF 8/6/2003
TR 16373 70 SF 11/6/2003
TR 16371 53 SF 11/5/2003
Section 5 - Assessment Diagrams:
Landscape Maintenance District 2
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 16253
SITE UTILIZATION
VICINITY MAP
5ueJ£cT'
SITE UTILIZATION
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 16255
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 15716
TRACTINDEX WITH PLANNING' AREAS
r~_~ ~r m T VICTORIA ARBORS
-- Vtctt, tt ~f t'ttq P
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 15716
TRACT INDEX WITH PLANNING AREAS
~ ~__~_~,~..? , VICTORIA ARBORS
-, ~ J~_
'TRACT NO. 15948 -' 5947
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 15716
t"22'_"2'j2'Z.D'.j"_'°" I ,~,~,, ~ TRACT INDEX WITH PLANNING AREAS
liiiii: ,~.~] *~-- VICTORIA ARBORS
Annual Engineer's Report
Fiscal Year 2004/2005
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A
(Hyssop Maintenance District)
ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT
Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A
(Hyssop Maintenance District)
City of Rancho Cucamonga
San Bernardino County, State of California
This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the
improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year
2004/2005, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention.
Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a
detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The
undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council.
Dated this 17th day of March, 2004.
Approved by'/~.: ~(~ t(:(/~,/~,~ '~, :,~. ~
/~illi~m J. O'Neil, ~ :n~ineer
TABLE OF CONTENTS
OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................................. 1
SECTION 1 - DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS: ............................................. 2
SECTION 2 - ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES: ....................................... 3
SECTION 3 - METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT: ..................... 4
A. GENERAL .......................................................................................................................... 4
B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................... 4
C. ASSESSMENT ..................................................................................................................... 5
SECTION 4 - ANNEXATIONS: ....................................................................................... 6
SECTION 5 - ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS: ................................................................. 7
III
Overview
The FY 2004/2005 Annual Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A (Hyssop
Maintenance District ) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4,
Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California
(Landscape and Light Act of 1972).
Section 1 Description of Improvements
The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Assessment District
consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the
improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto.
Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses
An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs
and expenses in connection therewith for FY 2004/2005, is set forth on the lists
thereof, attached hereto.
Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment
Discuses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The
method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services
provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel.
The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands
within the District for FY 2004/2005, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of
land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the
County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County
Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report
Section 4 Annexations
List the developments, which have annexed to the Landscape Maintenance District
within Calendar year 2003.
Section 5 Assessment Diagrams
Shows the boundaries of the areas to be annexed to the Landscape Maintenance
District No. 3A and the general boundaries of the District. For details regarding the
boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within
the Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A, refer to the San Bernardino County
Assessor's maps.
Section I - Description of Improvements:
Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A (LMD #3A) represents a landscape parkway
on Hyssop Drive south of Sixth Street. The site is associated with an area within that
district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly
attributed to those pamels within that district. Because of this, assessments required
for this district are charged to those parcels within that district.
The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows:
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3A
SITE LOCATIONS
Site# Descriptive Location
J-1 The west side of Hysop from 7th street to the south end of
the cul-de-sac.
Ground Cover area: 6,050 square feet.
Section 2 - Estimate of Costs and Expenses:
The budgeted costs for LMD #3A are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover,
shrubs and the neighborhood park. These functions, along with tree maintenance and
certain irrigation system repair and testing, are performed through a Contract Services
Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The
projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #3A are as follows:
Operations
Operations
Maintenance and Operations $430.00
Utilities
Water Utilities $830.00
Electric Utilities $210.00
Contract Services
Landscape Maintenance $2,130.00
Subtotal Operations $3,400.00
Assessment Administration and General Overhead $460.00
Total LMD #3a Expenditure Budget $3,860.00
Less Prior Year District Carryover $560.00
Assessment Revenue Required $3,300.00
Section 3 - Method of Assessment Apportionment:
A. General
The 1972 Act permits the establishments of assessment districts for the
purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction,
maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The
1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to
benefit rather than assessed value:
"The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may
be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount
among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be
received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements."
The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects
the composition of the pamels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly
apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel.
B. Assessment Methodology
Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to
relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent
Dwelling Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit
of assessment. A single family home equals one The Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU).
Every other land-use is converted to EDU's based on an assessment formula that
equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use),
and size of the property, as compared to a single-family home (SFR).
The EDU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most
appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts
formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each pamel from improvements are
apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table
provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each
parcel's EDU.
LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS
Property Type EDU Value Multiplier
Industrial 1.00 Unit
It is recommended that the rate per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU.) remain at
$413.74 for the FY 2004/2005. The following table summarizes the assessment rate
for the district:
# of # of Rate Per
Physical Unit Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
Land Use Type Units Units Units Unit Revenue
Industrial Parcel 8 1.0 8 $413.74 $3,309.92
C. Assessment
All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment
role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and hereby
made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the
net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal
Year 2004/2005, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the
District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County
assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor
and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report.
Section 4 - Annexations:
Calendar Year 2003 Annexations
Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A
No Annexations
Section 5 - Assessment Diagrams:
Landscape Maintenance District 3A
LEGEND
Ci~ Limi~
0 1 Miles
Annual Engineer's Report
Fiscal Year 2004/2005
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B
(Commercial Industrial Maintenance District)
ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT
Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B
(Commercial Industrial Maintenance District)
City of Rancho Cucamonga
San Bernardino County, State of California
This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the
improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year
2004/2005, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention.
Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a
detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The
undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council.
Dated this 17'h day of March, 2004.
Approved
/ William J. O'No'~it9 Engineer
[!
TABLE OF CONTENTS
OVERVIEW .............................................................................................................................
SECTION 1 - DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS: ............................................. 2
SECTION 2 - ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES: ....................................... 4
SECTION 3 - METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT: ..................... 5
A. GENERAL .......................................................................................................................... 5
B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................... 5
C. ASSESSMENT ..................................................................................................................... 6
SECTION 4 - ANNEXATIONS: ....................................................................................... 7
SECTION 5 - ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS: ................................................................. 8
III
Overview
The FY 2004/2005 Annual Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B
(Commercial Maintenance District) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of
Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of
California (Landscape and Light Act of 1972).
Section 1 Description of Improvements
The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Assessment District
consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the
improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto.
Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses
An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs
and expenses in connection therewith for FY 2004/2005, is set forth on the lists
thereof, attached hereto.
Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment
Discuses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The
method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services
provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel.
The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands
within the District for FY 2004/2005, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of
land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the
County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County
Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report
Section 4 Annexations
List the developments, which have annexed to the Landscape Maintenance District
within Calendar year 2003.
Section 5 Assessment Diagrams
Shows the boundaries of the areas to be annexed to the Landscape Maintenance
District No. 3B and the general boundaries of the District. For details regarding the
boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within
the Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B, refer to the San Bernardino County
Assessor's maps.
Section I - Description of Improvements:
Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (LMD #3B) represents landscape sites
throughout the Commercial/Industrial Maintenance District. These sites are
associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the
landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district.
Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels
within that district.
The various landscape sites that are maintained by this district consist of median
islands, parkways, street trees, entry monuments, the landscaping within the Metrolink
Station and 22.87 acres associated with the Adult Sports Park (not including the
stadium, parking lots or the maintenance building).
The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows:
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B
SITE LOCATIONS
Site # Descriptive Locations
J-2 The monument at the northeast corner of Haven and 4th Street.
Ground Cover area: 5,715 square feet
Turf area: 6,068 square feet
J-3 he 6th street median from Milliken to Pittsburg.
Ground Cover area: 3,300 square feet
J-4 he entry monuments on the east and west side of 4th and Milliken.
Ground Cover area: 19,771 square feet
Turf area 9,060 square feet
J-5 The Milliken median from Arrow to Jersey
Ground Cover area: 10,220 square feet
J-6 The Spruce median from Foothill to White Oak.
Ground Cover area: 4,300 square feet
J-7 The 6th Street median from Pittsburg to Richmond.
Ground Cover area: 51114 square feet
J-8 The 6th Street median from Richmond to Buffalo.
Ground Cover area: 2,476 square feet
J-9 The Milliken railroad underpass.
Ground Cover area: 165,633 square feet 12-12-01
added 5199 sq feet
Turf area: 4,897 square feet
J-10 The 6th street median from Cleveland to 1,820 feet east of Cleveland.
Ground Cover area: 13,310 square feet
J-11 The 6th Street median from Buffalo to Rochester.
Ground Cover area: 12,400 square feet
J-12 The Milliken median from Arrow to Jersey.
Ground Cover area: 13,855 square feet
J-13 The Milliken median from Century to Foothill Blvd.
Ground Cover area: 3,330 square feet
J-14 The 6th Street median from Utica to Cleveland.
Ground Cover area: 8,559 square feet.
Not accepted as of July 22, 2002.
Section 2 - Estimate of Costs and Expenses:
The budgeted costs for LMD #3B are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover,
shrubs and the neighborhood park. These functions, along with tree maintenance and
certain irrigation system repair and testing, are performed through a Contract Services
Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The
projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #3B are as follows:
Personnel
Regular Payroll $141,040.00
Overtime Salaries $2,500.00
Part-time Salaries $12,000.00
Fringe Benefits $53,320.00
Subtotal Personnel $208,860.00
Operations
Maintenance and Operations
Landscaping $13,300.00
Sports Complex $37,000.00
Animal Shelter $12,600.00
Facilities $1,000.00
Vehicle Maintenance and Operations $1,800.00
Emergency & Routine Vehicle Equipment Rental $2,000.00
Equipment Maintenance $22,190.00
Utilities
Water Utilities $70,000.00
Telephone Utilities $3,360.00
Electric Utilities $40,000.00
Contract Services
Landscape Maintenance $235,680.00
Landscape Maintenance - Sports Complex $41,000.00
Landscape Maintenance - Metrolink $30,000.00
Facilities $40,000.00
Tree Maintenance $35,300.00
CCWD Manditory Annual Backflow Cert. $2,500.00
Subtotal Operations $587,730.00
Capital Expenditures
Outlay/Equipment $2,250.00
Subtotal Capital Expenditures $2,250.00
Assessment Administration and General Overhead $62,050.00
Total LMD #3b Expenditure Budget $860,890.0'0
Less Prior Year District Carryover $50,363.75
Assessment Revenue Required $810,526.25
4
Section 3 - Method of Assessment Apportionment:
A. General
The 1972 Act permits the establishments of assessment districts for the
purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction,
maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The
1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to
benefit rather than assessed value:
"The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may
be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount
among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be
received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements."
The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects
the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly
appodion the costs based on benefit to each parcel.
B. Assessment Methodology
Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to
relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent
Dwelling unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit
of assessment. A single family home equals one The Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU).
Every other land-use is converted to EDU's based on an assessment formula that
equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use),
and size of the property, as compared to a single-family home (SFR).
The EDU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most
appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts
formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are
apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table
provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each
parcel's EDU.
LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS
Property Type EDU Value Multiplier
Commercial / Industrial 1.00 Acre
It is recommended that the rate per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU.) remain at
$352.80 for the FY 2004/2005. The following table summarizes the assessment rate
for the district:
# of Rate Per
Physical # of Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
Land Use Unit Type Units Units Units Unit Revenue
Comm/Ind Acre 2297.41 1.0 2297.41 $352.80 $810,526.25
C. Assessment
All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment
role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and hereby
made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the
net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal
Year 2004/2005, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the
District. These lots and pamels are more particularly described on the County
assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor
and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report.
Section 4 - Annexations:
Calendar Year 2003 Annexations
Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B
PROJECT UNITS ANNEX DATE
DR DR 00-79 3.71 AC 1/15/2003
DRC 2002-00820 3.57 AC 3/19/2003
DRC 2001-00805 9.21 AC 4/16/2003
DRC CUP 00-09 2.85 AC 4/16/2003
DRC 2002-00218 8.46 AC 5/7/2003
DRC 2002-00728 3.47 AC 5/21/2003
DRC DR 00-17 4.5 AC 5/21/2003
PM 16042 12.87 AC 6/4/2003
PM 15731 2.95 AC 7/2/2003
CUP 95-25 9.3 AC 7/16/2003
TR 16398 8.2 AC 7/16/2003
DRC 2002-00187 4.94AC 8/20/2003
PM 15665 34.78 AC 11/19/2003
DRC 2002-00306 1.75 AC 12/3/2003
7
Section 5 - Assessment Diagrams:
~~ < ~ - ~ ~ < > < Landscape Maintenance District 3B
E E
i !
. !
~ i ~ ~i · ~l~nAv
Banyan
19th ~
Base Line Rd Line Rd
Foothill Blvc
Arrow RI Arrow Rt
8th ST Legend
~ ' ~ City Limits
£ ~16th ~
~ ._= LU ~ LMD 3B
N.T.S.
City of Rancho CucamonRa
EXHIBIT *A'
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6
LEaF_ND
I-I P,5~' ~']"REETLIq H
(o~c~oo~-OOSTO)
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~o~
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO S~BT~I~3
STATE OF CALIFO~IA _
CIVIC CE ,,ITE~R.
~ AR~O~ ROUTE
SITE
N
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ENGINEERING DIV~ION
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6
RANCHO.
CUCAMONGA
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ENGINE.~ING DIVISION
ASsEss~'v[~I~ ])IAGI~
LANDSCAPE IVIAII~AiqCE DISTRICT lqO: 3B
ST.R.EET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6
VICINITY MAP
N.T.S.
City of Item: Staff Report
Rancho Cucamonga Title: Vicinity Map
ENGINEERING
DIVISION EXHIBIT: DRCCUP00-09
EXHIBIT
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6
/ 'P?oP~sED"'- ----
I
I
c[212
P~ASELINE ~
DAsr_Lh\Iz_ /~OAD,
SITE
..
4TH STREET (SAN EIERNARDINO AVENUE)
bJ
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
N.T.S.
PROJE~
00805
8~ S~EET
SAN BER~RDI~O ~
City of Rancho Cucamon~a
/$~
EXHIBIT
'" ASSF_,SSM~,~HT DIAGRAM
: LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B
S ~,TX~ET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6
3ERSL¥ ISOULEVA,ffD
7 ..
- ,~ ~ - ._ .F,...~.,-
tOeCo~ JERSEY ,LEGENd.
~ '15.00:
HPS¥ ST. LIC~HT
108(05 .J'£R, SEY ,
I
RANCHO.
CUCAMONGA
ONTARIO
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRI~p:~'6
4. 3 9 ,0~, .
P a
~' ~ pa~l~
'~X~ ~ ~ "~
~~2 AC .
CITY OF RANCHO CUCA~ONGA ~oa~u
COUNTY OF SAH BERHARDINO
STATE OF CALIFO~IA
DRCDR O0-1"I..-~
~RRO~ RO~T~
K TRAIN
City of Item: Staff Report
Rancho Cucamonga Title: Vicinity Map
ENGINEERING
DIVISION EXHIBIT: DRCDR00-17
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANC£ DISTRICT NO. ~!~
ST~ET LIGHT~G MA~T~ANCE D[~CT NOS.; AN
-
· ~ .~ '
PARCEL I
PORT~ON OF LOTS IO~*~JO6
~CDROO-i~
PARCEL
................ ! ~ ....
i ~[~ ~', ~ I ~ I
_ , -~ ..... ' -~ , ~'.~ '~
ARRO~
I
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~ORTII
COUNTY OF SA~ B~RHARDI~O
STAT~ OF CALIFO~IA P~~-I~
.Winery
~. Mixed U,~e ]... 9.&/e~'res 4-6/~
Mixed Use
A~s-- NAP
' ! !0:0 Acre*
o,~ Ac~
Victoria Gardefls Lane
Th area is comprised of approximatd~:
Foothill Boulevard
CITY OF ITEM:
RANCHO CUCAMONGA T~TLE: ~
ENGINEERING DIVISION EXHIBIT:
007'18'--
City of Rancho Cucamonga
EXHIBIT "A"
· ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B
' STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6
L,E(~EIdD
,' e- g~O0 L HP. SV 5TRF..£'~ LIGHT
DR C 2OO,I- 007 i/:3 ....
\
/
/
/
COSTCO /
CITY OF R^NCHO
COUNTY' O~ SAN BD~LN^RDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
·' ; ! I I~ZS.
z~,.,~,~' DRC200Z-'O0185
F_O0 7'/4-1L-/.. ~'/.. VD,
City of Rancho Cucamon.qa
EXHIBIT "A"
AssESs1viE1VT DIAC, R,AiVI
LANDSCAPE IvIAII,,TTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NOR'ri,
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
,c,, c' ,z'-r- .~.. ~, ' ~'~
ARROW ROUTE
,, LOCATION
I < 7TH STREET
~ll
~, ,t, 6TH STREET II z
/
4m STREET
CITY OF ~2,1: ~~~_~
RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~~1
EI~GINE~ERING DIVISION EXIH~IT:
//$
r)~s
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ' STATE OF CALIFO~IA
· BASE UNE ROAD
Z
CHURCH ~T.
FOOTHILL BLVD.
CITY OF 1TEM: ~
RANCHO CUCAMONGA Tn'LF~ ~!
ENGiN~,ERING DIVISION
CITY OF RAI~CI-IO CUCAMONGA . No~'r~,,~
COUNTY OF SAI~I BERNARDII'qO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~
CITY OF n~.~
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
:~l'C-]~r,,~, DIVISION F,X.I-n~IT:
· CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA norT'
cOunTY O~ san ~.RN^r~no
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ARROW ROU TE
N
~ STREET
~ 5TH S~EET
City of Item: Staff Report
Rancho Cucamonga Title: Vicinity Map
ENGINEERING
DIVISION EXHIBIT: DRC2002-00187
CITY OF ~C~f C~CAMO~GA
COU~Y 0F SAN BE~ARDIN0
STATE OF CALIFO~IA
I0 PWY
VI G'I NI I'Y MA?
CJ't~JE OF
RANCHO
8TM STREET
N.T.S.
'l / "! III
6*"
STREET
!:- ~' VIC~TY ~.
PARCEL MAP 16139
8TM STREET
N.T.S.
Parcel A
Parcel B
/
6TM STREET
· ' Exhibit A-2
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
............ VICiNTi~-~-~-~ .......................... ~__
PARCEL MAP 16139
Annexation to LIVID 3B, SLD 1 and SLD 6
CITY OF
~ANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLm~
~GINEERING DIVISION
" sx~u~,:,om'mo ~..,mmmA~iceUmmUcrNos.
_ _ _ '~ ~' :
~, d { ~-. ~ . I~'t . ~ ~ ~-~---
~ .... ~ ~' ~...___.__
'~ ' mil ' '
. ~ .. .~ ' ~--
J~'~) iii/ ~-~.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONC, A ..... ~'oa'r,! ,~
COUI',,FrY OF SAN BE. RNARDIN_O . .. ' ~t": '.
.... . . .STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~
Annual Engineer's Report
Fiscal Year 2004/2005
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Landscape Maintenance District No. 4
(Terra Vista Planned Community)
ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT
Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 4
(Terra Vista Planned Community)
City of Rancho Cucamonga
San Bernardino County, State of California
This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the
improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year
2004/2005, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention.
Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a
detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The
undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council.
Dated this 17th day of Mamh, 2004.
~/ William J. O'Neil,~ty En~gineer
TABLE OF CONTENTS
OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................................. 1
SECTION 1 - DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS: ............................................. 2
SECTION 2 - ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES: ....................................... 8
SECTION 3 - METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT: ..................... 9
A. GENERAL .......................................................................................................................... 9
B. ASSESSMENT ]METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................... 9
C. ASSESSlVlENT ................................................................................................................... 10
SECTION 4 - ANNEXATIONS: ..................................................................................... 1!
SECTION 5 - ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS: ............................................................... 12
III
Overview
The FY 2004/2005 Annual Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra
Vista Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article
4, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California
(Landscape and Light Act of 1972).
Section 1 Description of Improvements
The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Assessment District
consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the
improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto.
Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses
An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs
and expenses in connection therewith for FY 2004/2005, is set forth on the lists
thereof, attached hereto.
Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment
Discuses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The
method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services
provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel.
The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands
within the District for FY 2004/2005, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of
land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the
County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County
Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report
Section 4 Annexations
List the developments, which have annexed to the Landscape Maintenance District
within Calendar year 2003.
Section 5 Assessment Diagrams
Shows the boundaries of the areas to be annexed to the Landscape Maintenance
District No. 4 and the general boundaries of the District. For details regarding the
boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within
the Landscape Maintenance District No. 4, refer to the San Bernardino County
Assessor's maps.
Section 1 - Description of Improvements:
Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 (LMD #4) represents landscape sites
throughout the Term Vista Planned Community. These sites are considered to be
associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the
landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district.
Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels
within that district.
The various landscape sites in Terra Vista that are maintained by the district consist of
parkways, median islands, street trees, paseos and parks. The 36.23 acres of park
consist of Coyote Canyon Park, Milliken Park, West Greenway
The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows:
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4
SITE LOCATIONS
Site # Descriptive Location
TV-1 The monument on the southwest corner of Haven and Base Line; the Base
Line median from Haven to the Deer Creek Channel; and the south side of
Base Line from Haven to Deer Creek Channel less the frontage of the
condominium complex.
Ground Cover area: 181091 square feet
Turf area: 21,799 square feet
TV-2 Base Line median from Spruce to Deer Cr. eek Channel; the south side of
Base Line from Deer Creek Channel to Spruce; the west side of Spruce from
Base Line to Terra Vista Parkway; the north side of Spyglass from Spruce to
Roxbury.
Ground Cover area: 15,072 square feet
Turf area: 18,858 square feet
TV-3 The Base Line median east of Spruce.
Ground Cover area: 12,707 square feet
Turf area: 181820 square feet
TV-4 The south side of Base Line from 800 feet east of Spruce to Milliken. The
cul-de-sac at the north end of Cascade.
Ground Cover area: 9,278 square feet
Turf area: 12,659 square feet
TV-5 The north side of Terra Vista Parkway from Belpine to 112 feet west of
Butterfield; Terra Vista Parkway median from Spruce to Milliken and the
south side of Terra Vista Parkway from 164 feet west of Belpine to Belpine.
Ground Cover area: 13,411 square feet
Turf area: 6,555 square feet
TV-6 The north side of Terra Vista Parkway from Spruce to 175 feet north of
Countryside and Terra Vista Parkway median from Church to Spruce.
Ground Cover area: 17,991 square feet
Turf area: 11,413 square feet
TV-7 The north side of Church from the Deer Creek Channel to Terra Vista
Parkway; the west side of Terra Vista Parkway from Church to 175 feet north
of Countryside.
Ground Cover. area: 9,924 square feet
Turf area: 5,378 square feet
TV-8 The southeast corner of Church and Haven; the Church median from Haven
to Terra Vista Parkway and the wash end on the Northwest corner of the
Deer Creek Channel and Church.
Ground Cover area: 26,876 square feet
Turf area: 2,306 square feet
TV-9 The Church median from Terra Vista Parkway to Elm.
Ground Cover area: 3,749 square feet
TV-10 The east side of Valencia from Base Line to the pre-school; the south side of
Augusta from Valencia to Meadow Lark and the west side of Summerfield
from Valencia to Evergreen.
Ground Cover area: 20,818 square feet
Turf area: 18,634 square feet
TV-11 The paseo at Parkside and Clover from Parkside to the Deer Creek Channel.
Ground Cover area: 2,795 square feet
TV-12 The east side of Haven from the pre-school to the Southern Pacific Railroad.
Ground Cover area: 6,170 square feet
Turf area: 2,091 square feet
TV-13 The east side of Spruce from Elm to Mountain View; the north and south
sides of Norfolk from Spruce to Cardiff; the south side of Mountain View from
Spruce to 290 feet east of Belvedere and the paseo from Spruce to
Countryview.
Ground Cover area: 8,459 square feet
Turf area: 3,355 square feet
TV-14 The south side of Mountain View from 290 feet east of Belevedere to 590
feet east of Fairhaven; the paseo south of Mountain View between
Belevedere and Fairhaven to Country View and from Countryview to West
Greenway Corridor.
Ground Cover area: 19,030 square feet
Turf area: 8,430 square feet
TV-15 The north side of Mountain View from 634 feet west of Biarritz to Milliken.
Ground Cover area: 4,571 square feet
Turf area: 4,738 square feet
TV-16 The west Greenway Corridor from the northeast corner of Elm and Spruce to
West Greenway Park.
Ground Cover area: 15,529 square feet
Turf area: 20,884 square feet
TV-17 The west side of Milliken from 585 feet north of Mountain View to Mountain
View.
Ground Cover area: 5,835 square feet
Turf area: 3,564 square feet
TV-18 The south side of Mountain View from approximately 250 feet west of
Claridge to Terra Vista Parkway; the south side of Terra Vista Parkway from
Mountain View to East Greenway Corridor; Terra Vista Parkway from
Mountain View to East Greenway Corridor.
Ground Cover area: 18,316 square feet
Turf area: 5,944 square feet
TV-19 The Terra Vista Parkway median from Milliken to Mountain View; the north
side of Terra Vista Parkway from 68 feet north of Addison to Mountain View;
the west side of Mountain View from Grapevine to Terra Vista Parkway.
Ground Cover area: 20,306 square feet
Turf area: 3,886 square feet
TV-20 The Church median from Milliken to 675 feet east of Milliken.
Ground Cover area: 2,860 square feet
4
TV-21 The Church median from Milliken to Spruce.
Ground Cover area: 16,811 square feet
Turf area: 335 square feet
TV-22 The Milliken median from Mountain View to Foothill.
Ground Cover area: 16,436 square feet
TV-23 The Milliken underpass from West Greenway Park to Milliken Park.
Ground Cover area: 19,271 square feet
Turf area: 22,139 square feet
TV-24 The east side of Haven from 145 feet south of Creekbridge to 600 feet north
of Creekbridge; the northside of Creekbridge from Brookside to Haven and
the paseo from Creekbridge and Brookside to the Deer Creek Channel.
Ground Cover area: 5,851 square feet
Turf area: 9,965 square feet
TV-25 The east side of Haven from 145 feet south of Creekbridge to 410 feet south
of Creekbridge.
Ground Cover area: 3,319 square feet
Turf area: 1,677 square feet
TV-26 The paseo at Plymouth south of Essex from Plymouth to the Deer Creek
Channel.
Ground Cover. area: 1,956 square feet
TV-27 The paseo from Terra Vista Parkway to Windsong and from Windsong to
Plymouth.
Ground Cover area: 2,270 square feet
Turf area: 2,731 square feet
TV-28 The paseo at 7552 Hardy.
Ground Cover area: 630 square feet
Turf area: 733 square feet
TV-29 The East Greenway Corridor from Milliken Park to Terra Vista Parkway.
Ground Cover area: 17,780 square feet
Turf area: 51,478 square feet
TV-30 The Milliken Median from Mountain View to Base Line.
Ground Cover area: 11,890 square feet
TV-31 The paseo from Elm to West Greenway Park.
Ground Cover area: 4,770 square feet
TV-32 The Greenwich paseo from Greenwich to Muirfield.
Ground Cover. area: 11323 square feet
TV-33 The south side of Mountain View from 430 feet west of Country View to
Country View.
Ground Cover. area: 3,434 square feet
Turf area: 1,853 square feet
TV-34 The south side of Terra Vista Parkway from 390 feet west of Belpine to
Belpine.
Ground Cover area: 1,342 square feet
Turf area: 1,887 square feet
TV-35 The Trail Northeast of Ruth Musser School from Terra Vista Parkway to
Spruce.
Ground Cover area: 91285
TV-36 The north side Meyers from Emery Place to Elm.
Ground Cover. area: 9,141 square feet
Turf area: 5,895 square feet
TV-37 The north side of Meyers from Emery Place to Elm.
Ground Cover area: 5,860 square feet
Turf area: 51300 square feet
TV-38 The Church median from Rochester to Terra Vista Parkway median from
Church to 853 north of Church.
Ground Cover area: 8,510 square feet
TV-39 The north side of Mountain View from 250 feet east of Milliken to Milliken. The
eastside of Milliken from Mountain View to Terra Vista Parkway.
Ground Cover area: 16,751 square feet
TV-40 The southside of Terra Vista Parkway from Milliken to Mountain View.
Ground Cover area: 11,630 square feet.
TV-41 The paseo from south of Terra Vista parkway to Mountain View which is east of
Milliken.
Ground Cover area: 4,081 square feet
TV-42 The north side of Mountain View from Terra Vista Parkway to 250 feet east of
Milliken.
Ground Cover ama: 10,994 square feet
TV-43 Church median and parkway from Malaga to Terra Vista Parkway.
Ground Cover area: 7,506 square feet
TV-44 The southside of Chumh from Terra Vista Parkway to Rochester.
Ground Cover area: 10,400 square feet
TV-45 The westside of Rochester from Church to Malaga.
Ground Cover area: 20,693 square feet
TV-46 The north side of Malaga from Church to Rochester.
Ground Cover area: 19,843 square feet
TV-47 The eastside of Terra Vista Parkway from Church to Brandywine. The paseo from
Brandwine to Bunker Hill Drive. The eastside of Radcliff from Bunker to Malada.
Ground Cover area: 17,838 square feet
Section 2 - Estimate of Costs and Expenses:
The budgeted costs for LMD #4 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover,
shrubs and the neighborhood park. These functions, along with tree maintenance and
certain irrigation system repair and testing, are performed through a Contract Services
Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The
projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #4 are as follows:
Personnel
Personnel
Regular Payroll $598,720.00
Overtime Salaries $1,000.00
Part-time Salaries $11,000.00
Fringe Benefits $222,560.00
Subtotal Personnel $833,280.00
Operations
Maintenance and Operations
Landscaping $57,840.00
Facilities $14,620.00
Vehicle Maintenance and Operations $28,980.00
Equipment Maintenance $18,100.00
Emergency & Routine Vehicle Equipment Rental $1,000.00
Utilities
Water Utilities $131,000.00
Telephone Utilities $2,940.00
Electric Utilities $25,410.00
Contract Services
Parkway & Median Maintenance $291,150.00
Park Landscape Maintenance $51,500.00
Tree Maintenance $13,200.00
CCWD Manditory Annual Backflow Cert. $1,700.00
Contract Services - Facilities $16,000.00
Subtotal Operations $653,440.00
Capital Expenditures
Outlay/Building Improvements $4,000.00
Outlay/Equipment $9,450.00
Subtotal Capital Expenditures $13,450.00
Assessment Administration and General Overhead $125,470.00
Total LMD #4 Expenditure Budget $1,625,640.00
Less Prior Year District Carryover $107,751.28
Assessment Revenue Required $1,517,888.72
Section 3 - Method of Assessment Apportionment:
A. General
The 1972 Act permits the establishments of assessment districts for the
purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction,
maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The
1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to
benefit rather than assessed value:
"The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may
be apportioned by any formula or method which fa/dy distributes the net amount
among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be
received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements."
The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects
the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly
apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel.
B. Assessment Methodology
Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to
relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent
Dwelling Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit
of assessment. A single family home equals one The Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU).
Every other land-use is converted to EDU's based on an assessment formula that
equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use),
and size of the property, as compared to a single-family home (SFR).
The EDU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most
appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts
formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are
apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table
provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each
parcel's EDU.
LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS
Property Type EDU Value Multiplier
Multi-family 1.00 Unit
Single Family 1.00 Parcel
Commercial / Industrial 1.00 Acre
Senior Housing 1.00 Unit
It is recommended that the rate per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU.) remain at same
rate for the FY 2004/2005. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for
the district:
# of # of
Physical Unit Physical Assessment Assessment Rate Per
Land Use Type Units Unit Units Assessment Unit Revenue
Single Family Parcel 2653 1 2653 $252.50 $669,882.50
Multi-Family Unit 3280 1 3280 $222.00 $728,160.00
Senior Housing Unit 216 1 216 $148.36 $32,045.76
Commercial Acre 229.25 1 229.25 $382.99 $87,800.46
Total $1,517,888.72
C. Assessment
All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment
role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and hereby
made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the
net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal
Year 2004/2005, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the
District. These lots and pamels are more particularly described on the County
assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor
and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report.
10
Section 4 - Annexations:
Calendar Year 2003 Annexations
Landscape Maintenance District No. 4
PROJECT UNITS ANNEX DATE
TR 15724 78 MF 3/5/2003
PM 15923 216 SH 8/6/2003
DRC 2001-00437 1.39 AC 11/5/2003
ll
Section 5 - Assessment Diagrams:
< ~ ~ · < Landscape Maintenance District 4
r-"~~ = - <
,..-..i ~ ~ ~ = ~
,~ ~ ,ff ............. ~ i, [ ......
B~nyan S~ ~
!
I
Arrow Rt ~,rrow Rt
I
I
8th St> ! Legend
· ~ ~ City Limits
.o ~'6th ~
LMD
4
acer,raW ~¢¢ ..... t~ein~ o~ ..~ 4th 4th St
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA TrrLE:~
~'~GINEEEING DIVISION
EXHIBIT "A -~ ~
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAU~TENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTP~CT NOS. i AND 4
{
!
~ '"'---~-- ~ i ' ' ' /' '
L I ,.-' ? ~ ~ , '~ .......... 4--~___ ; i ,~...
CITY OF ~NCHO CUCAMONGA NORTtl ~
COUNTY OF SAN BE~ARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~
~ NORTH Q 1"=200'
CITY OF I~m:
RANCHO CUCAMONGA e~t TITLE: Parcel Map 15630
ENGINEERING DIVISION ~:~ EXHIBIT:' Vicinity Map
PARCEL MAI) 15923
title;
CITY OF RANCi-IO CUCAMONGA
/\
ENGINEERING DIVISION N
VICINITY MAP
216 Market Rate Senior
Apartments per DRC2002-00633
Parcel for
Future Development
PARCEL MAP 15923
Annexation to LMD 4, SLD 1 and SLD 4
~.o?- .... -.~.OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A "'
, AN SCALE: 1==150'
~ ,
P~EL B
~'
, ~s(5'~t u ]~ 8~5~'~'E I ~-~' I
~. I & ~ ~ , f NO. I DELTA ~DI~ I LENGTH ~ TANG~T II
~.~. .
/ ~
'0" :. ~.~:?}:;' '-~:~''''
= ~G LOT UNE TO R~N ROB~
~ = N~ LOTUNE
........ ~M~ UNE nwc
Annual Engineer's Report
Fiscal Year 2004/2005
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Landscape Maintenance District No. 5
(Tot Lot)
ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT
Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 5
(Tot Lot)
City of Rancho Cucamonga
San Bernardino County, State of California
This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the
improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year
2004/2005, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention.
Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a
detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The
undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council.
Dated this 17th day of March, 2004.
William J. O'Neil, ~'ity ~:ngineer
TABLE OF CONTENTS
OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................................. 1
SECTION 1 - DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS: ............................................. 2
SECTION 2 - ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES: ....................................... 3
SECTION 3 - METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT: ..................... 4
A. GENERAL .......................................................................................................................... 4
B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................... 4
C. ASSESSMENT ..................................................................................................................... 5
SECTION 4 - ANNEXATIONS: ....................................................................................... 6
SECTION 5 - ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS: ................................................................. 7
III
Overview
The FY 2004/2005 Annual Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (Tot Lot)
is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2,
Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and
Light Act of 1972).
Section 1 Description of Improvements
The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Assessment District
consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the
improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto.
Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses
An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs
and expenses in connection therewith for FY 2004/2005, is set forth on the lists
thereof, attached hereto.
Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment
Discuses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The
method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services
provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel.
The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands
within the District for FY 2004/2005, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of
land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the
County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County
Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report
Section 4 Annexations
List the developments, which have annexed to the Landscape Maintenance District
within Calendar year 2003.
Section 5 Assessment Diagrams
Shows the boundaries of the areas to be annexed to the Landscape Maintenance
District No. 5 and the general boundaries of the District. For details regarding the
boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within
the Landscape Maintenance District No. 5, refer to the San Bernardino County
Assessor's maps.
Section I - Description of Improvements:
Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (LMD #5) represents a landscaped tot lot,
located on the southwest corner of Andover Place and Bedford Drive. This site is
associated with a group of 44 single family parcels which all have a common usage of
the tot lot such that any benefit derived from the landscaping can be directly attributed
to those particular parcels. Because of this, assessment required for this district is
charged to those specific parcels.
The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows:
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5
SITE LOCATIONS
Site # Descriptive Location
I-1-5 The tot lot on the southwest corner of Andover and Bedford.
Ground Cover area: 1,506 square feet
Turf area: 11070 square feet
LMD-5 TOTAL GROUND COVER: 1,506 square feet
LMD-5 TOTAL TURF: 1,070 square feet
Section 2 - Estimate of Costs and Expenses:
The budgeted costs for LMD #5 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover,
shrubs and the neighborhood park. These functions, along with tree maintenance and
certain irrigation system repair and testing, are performed through a Contract Services
Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The
projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #5 are as follows:
Operations
Maintenance and Operations
Landscaping $300.00
Vehicle Maintenance and Operations $70.00
Utilities
Water Utilities $540.00
Electric Utilities $260.00
Contract Services
Landscape Maintenance $1,800.00
Subtotal Operations $2,970.00
Assessment Administration and General Overhead $890.00
Total LMD #5 Expenditure Budget $3,860.00
Prior Year Deficit Recovery $1,124.86
Assessment Revenue Required $4,984.86
Section 3 - Method of Assessment Apportionment:
A. General
The 1972 Act permits the establishments of assessment districts for the
purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction,
maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The
1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to
benefit rather than assessed value:
"The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may
be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount
among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be
received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements."
The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects
the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly
apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel.
B. Assessment Methodology
Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to
relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent
Dwelling Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit
of assessment. A single family home equals one The Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU).
Every other land-use is converted to EDU's based on an assessment formula that
equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use),
and size of the property, as compared to a single-family home (SFR).
The EDU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most
appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts
formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are
apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development.. The following table
provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each
parcel's EDU.
LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS
Property Type EDU Value Multiplier
Single Family 1.00 Pamel
4
It is recommended that the rate per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU.) remain at
$113.29 for the FY 2004/2005. The following table summarizes the assessment rate
for the district:
# of Rate per
Physical Unit # of Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
Land Use Type Units Unit Factor Units Unit Revenue
Single Family Parcel 44 1 44 $113.29 $4,984.76
C. Assessment
All assessed lots or parcels within the DistriCt are listed on the assessment
role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and hereby
made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the
net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal
Year 2004/2005, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the
District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County
assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor
and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report.
Section 4 - Annexations:
Calendar Year 2003 Annexations
Landscape Maintenance District No. 5
No Annexations
Section 5 - Assessment Diagrams:
Landscape Maintenance District 5
Annual Engineer's Report
Fiscal Year 2004/2005
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Landscape Maintenance District No. 6
(Caryn Planned Community)
ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT
Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 6
(Caryn Planned Community)
City of Rancho Cucamonga
San Bernardino County, State of California
This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the
improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year
2004/2005, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention.
Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a
detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The
undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council.
Dated this 17th day of March, 2004.
,/William J. O'Neil, C_~ Engineer
TABLE OF CONTENTS
OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................................. 1
SECTION 1 - DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS: ............................................. 2
SECTION 2 - ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES: ....................................... 6
SECTION 3 - METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT: ..................... 7
A. GENEI~'a~ .......................................................................................................................... 7
B. ASSESSMENT ]METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................... 7
C. ASSESSMENT ..................................................................................................................... 8
SECTION 4 - ANNEXATIONS: ....................................................................................... 9
SECTION 5 - ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS: ............................................................... 10
III
Overview
The FY 2004/2005 Annual Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 (Caryn
Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4,
Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California
(Landscape and Light Act of 1972).
Section 1 Description of Improvements
The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Assessment District
consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the
improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto.
Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses
An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs
and expenses in connection therewith for FY 2004/2005, is set forth on the lists
thereof, attached hereto.
Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment
Discuses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The
method reflects the composition of the pamels, and the improvements and services
provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel.
The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands
within the District for FY 2004/2005, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of
land within the District. These lots and pamels are more particularly described on the
County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County
Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report
Section 4 Annexations
List the developments, which have annexed to the Landscape Maintenance District
within Calendar year 2003.
Section 5 Assessment Diagrams
Shows the boundaries of the areas to be annexed to the Landscape Maintenance
District No. 6 and the general boundaries of the District. For details regarding the
boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within
the Landscape Maintenance District No. 6, refer to the San Bernardino County
Assessor's maps.
Section I - Description of Improvements:
Landscape Maintenance District No. $ (LMD #6) represents landscape sites
throughout the Caryn Planned Community. These sites are associated with areas
within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can
be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this,
assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district.
The various sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands,
paseos, street trees, and community trails..
The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows:
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6
SITE LOCATIONS
Site # Descriptive Locations
CC-1 The Milliken median from 355 feet S/0 Vintage to Banyan. The south side of
Banyan from 1290 feet west of Milliken to Milliken; the west side of Milliken
from Banyan to 801 feet south of Vintage.
Ground Cover area: 112,068 square feet
Turf area: 20,222 square feet
CC-2 This site was deleted 7-1-00 and was combined with CC-l. Both sites had
7784 square feet of ground cover deleted and 4077 of turf deleted.
CC-3 The paseo on the west side of Morning from Morning Place to Deer Creek
Channel.
Ground Cover area 2,801 square feet
Turf area: 124 square feet
CC-4 The west side of Morning PI., from Banyan to Starview PI.; the north side of
Star View PI., from Morning PI., to Star View CT.
Ground Cover area: 14,273 square feet
Turf area: 5,513 square feet
CC-5 Silver Sun paseo from the end of Silver Sun cul-de-sac to Deer Creek
Channel.
Ground Cover area: 25,890 square feet
Turf area: 12,084 square feet
CC-6 The east and west side of Netherlands View Loop from Vintage to Vintage.
The Netherlands View Loop paseo from Netherlands View Loop to Mt
Sterling CT.
Ground Cover area: 88,902 square feet
Turf area: 676 square feet
CC-7 The east and west side of Hillview Loop from Mt. Rainer CT. to Kettle Peak.
Ground Cover area: 14,930 square feet
Turf area: 6,318 square feet
CC-8 The paseo from Hillview Loop to Vintage Drive.
Ground Cover area: 42,107 square feet
Turf area: 22,752 square feet
CC-9 The south side of Vintage from 250 feet west of Hillview Loop to Hillview
Loop. The west side of Hillview Loop from Vintage to Kettle Peak. The west
side of Kettle Peak from Hillview Loop to Donner Pass CT. The east side of
Hillview Loop from Kettle Peak to Tioga Peak.
Ground Cover area: 47,334 square feet
Turf area: 4,954 square feet
CC~10 The east side of Terrace View Loop from Vintage to Butler Peak. The west
side of Terrace View Loop from Rainbow Falls CT. to Vintage.
Ground Cover area: 241603 square feet
CC-11 The paseo from Caryn School to Banyan. The south side of Banyan from
the paseo to Rochester. The east and west side of Mt. Baldy CT. from
Banyan to Sierra Crest View Loop. The north side of Sierra Crest View Loop
from Hilltop CT. to Woodland CT.
Ground Cover area: 47,507 square feet
Turf area: 7,810 square feet
CC-12 The separation paseo from Vintage to Pinnacle Peak.
Ground Cover area: 50,325 square feet
Turf area: 15,021 square feet
CC-13 The east side of Hillview Loop from Tioga Peak CT. to Vintage. The south
side of Vintage From Hillview Loop to Terrace View Loop. The north side of
Vintage from Hillview Loop to Caryn School. The east side of Terrace View
Loop from Vintage to Mt. San Antonio CT.
Ground Cover area: 26,162 square feet
Turf area: 4,508 square feet
CC-14 The east side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Mt. Waverly to Vintage. The
north side of Vintage from Sierra Crest View Loop to Sierra Crest View Loop.
The east and west side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Vintage to Mt. Wilson
CT. The south side of vintage from Netherlands View Loop to 330 feet west
of Netherlands View Loop.
Ground Cover area: 73,250 square feet
Turf area: 16,525 square feet
CC-15 The south side of Sierra Crest View Loop From Mt. Waverly CT. to Mt.
Cambridge CT. The nodh side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Mt.
Cambridge CT. to Woodland CT. The north side of Sierra Crest View Loop
from Hilltop CT. to Caryn School. The Sierra Crest View Loop paseo from
Sierra Crest View Loop to Mt. Sherman CT.
Ground Cover area: 70,990 square feet
Turf area: 7,699 square feet
CC-16 The south side of Vintage from Netherlands View Loop to Rochester. The
north side of Vintage from Rochester to Sierra Crest View Loop. The east
and west side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Mt. Wilson CT. to Mt.
Cambridge CT. The Netherlands View Loop paseo from Vintage to Mt.
Sterling CT.
Ground Cover area: 77,202 square feet
Turf area: 3,954 square feet
CC-17 The east side of Milliken from Vintage to Banyan
Ground Cover area: 13,740 square feet
Turf area: 9,088 square feet
CC-18 The north side of Vintage from Milliken to Hillview Loop. The south side of
Vintage from 104 feet west of Hillview to Milliken.
Ground Cover area: 32,909 square feet
Turf area: 8,599 square feet
CC-19 The Terrace View Loop paseo from Vintage to Terrace View Loop.
Ground Cover area 17,496 square feet
Turf area: 15,617 square feet
4
CC-20 The east side of Terrace View Loop from Mt. San Antonio CT. to El Capitan
CT. The west side of Terrace View Loop from Butler Peak PI. to Mt San
Antonio CT.
Ground Cover area: 20,627 square feet
Turf area: 20,017 square feet
CC-21 The west side of Rochester from Banyan to 780 feet south of Vintage
Ground Cover area: 49,984 square feet
CC-22 The south side of Vintage from Terrace View Loop to Sierra Crest View
Loop. The east and west side of Hillview loop from Vintage to Mt. Rainer
CT.
Ground Cover area: 11,609 square feet
Turf area: 3,763 square feet
CC-23 The south side of Banyan from Milliken to Butler Peak PI. The west side of
Butler Peak PI. from Banyan to Terrace View Loop. The norfh side of
Terrace View Loop from Butler Peak PI. to Rainbow Falls CT.
Ground Cover area: 12,132 square feet
CC-24 The north side of Terrace View Loop From El Capitan CT. to Butler Peak PI.
The east side of Butler Peak PI. from Terrace View Loop to Banyan. The
south side of Banyan from Butler Peak PI. to 990 feet east of Butler Peak PI.
Ground Cover area: 14,452 square feet
CC-25 This site was moved to CC-13. This mainline was part of CC-13 and should
not of been its own site.
CC-26 The east side of Rochester from Vintage to 562 feet north of Vintage. The
north and south
side of Vintage from to Rochester to Thunder Mountain.
Ground Cover area: 1 8,212 square feet
CC-27 The Westside of Milliken north of Freeway. Not accepted as of July 22,
2002.
CC-28 The east side of Milliken from Vintage to the 210 freeway right of way.
Ground Cover area: 17,724 square feet
5
Section 2 - Estimate of Costs and Expenses:
The budgeted costs for LMD #6 are for direct maintenance of tur/, ground cover,
shrubs and the neighborhood park. These functions, along with tree maintenance and
certain irrigation system repair and testing, are performed through a Contract Services
Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The
projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #6 are as follows:
Personnel
Regular Payroll $14,140.00
Fringe Benefits $5,230.00
Subtotal Personnel $19,370.00
Operations
Maintenance and Operations
Landscaping $13,190.00
Vehicle Maintenance and Operations $2,480.00
Emergency & Routine Vehicle Equipment Rental $100.00
Equipment Maintenance $270.00
Utilities
Water Utilities $81,800.00
Electric Utilities $5,200.00
Contract Services
Parkway & Median Landscape Maintenance $251,630.00
Tree Maintenance $25,200.00
Subtotal Operations $379,870.00
Assessment Administration and General Overhead $32,480.00
Total LMD #6 Expenditure Budget $431,720.00
Less Prior Year District Carryover $117,080.00
Assessment Revenue Required $314,640.00
6
Section 3 - Method of Assessment Apportionment:
A. General
The 1972 Act permits the establishments of assessment districts for the
purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction,
maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The
1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to
benefit rather than assessed value:
"The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may
be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount
among afl assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be
received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements."
The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects
the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly
apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel.
B. Assessment Methodology
Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to
relate the different types of pamel improvements to each other. The Equivalent
Dwelling Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit
of assessment. A single family home equals one The Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU).
Every other land-use is converted to EDU's based on an assessment formula that
equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use),
and size of the property, as compared to a single-family home (SFR).
The EDU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most
appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts
formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are
apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table
provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each
parcel's EDU.
LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS
Property Type EDU Value Multiplier
Single Family 1.00 Parcel
7
It is recommended that the rate per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU.) remain at
$246.97 for the FY 2004/2005. The following table summarizes the assessment rate
for the district:
# of # of Rate per
Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
Land Use Unit Type Units Unit Factor Units Unit Revenue
Single Family Parcel 1274 1.0 1274 $246.97 $314,639.78
C. Assessment
All assessed lots or pamels within the District are listed on the assessment
role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and hereby
made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the
net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal
Year 2004/2005, and describes each assessable lot or pamel of land within the
District. These lots and pamels are more particularly described on the County
assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor
and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report.
8
Section 4 - Annexations:
Calendar Year 2003 Annexations
Landscape Maintenance District No. 6
No Annexations
Section 5 - Assessment Diagrams:
Landscape Maintenance District 6
Arrow
LEGEND
LMO 6 Boundary
N.T.S.
STREET
El
City of Rancho Cucamon.qa
EXHIBIT "A"
-~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
'LANDSCAPE MAINTeNaNCE DISTRICT NO.6
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 5~)S. 1 AND 5
- LEGEI~ID
~,.i' I .. o--* SLD ~5, S~OL H?SV 5TREETLIGHT
""2:3 , I e--. SLD#I, 2500L HPSV
I' ~ -~----- ---
'" "?' LO5, 0505
HIGH $~HO0I_..
· ' ~" ~--~1 '
- L~ '"----+~3~D ~ j',tJLLIKEN AVE.
,+
t'
, /
City of Item: Staff Report
Rancho Cucamonga Title: Annexation Map
ENGINEERING
The Improyements
DIVISION
EXHIBIT:
Annexation of Work Program
CITY OF RANCHO CUC~NGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Annual Engineer's Report
Fiscal Year 2004/2005
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Landscape Maintenance District No. 7
(North Etiwanda)
ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT
Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 7
(North Etiwanda)
City of Rancho Cucamonga
San Bernardino County, State of California
This Repod describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the
improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year
2004/2005, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention.
Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a
detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The
undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council.
Dated this 17th day of March, 2004.
' William J. O'Neil, ~ity E~gineer
TABLE OF CONTENTS
OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................................. 1
SECTION 1 - DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS: ............................................. 2
SECTION 2 - ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES: ....................................... 6
SECTION 3 - METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT: ..................... ?
A. GENERAL .......................................................................................................................... 7
B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................... 7
C. ASSESSMENT ..................................................................................................................... 8
SECTION 4 - ANNEXATIONS: ....................................................................................... 9
SECTION 5 - ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS: ...............................................................10
III
Overview
The FY 2004/2005 Annual Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (North
Etiwanda) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1,
Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape
and Light Act of 1972).
Section 1 Description of Improvements
The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Assessment District
consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the
improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto.
Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses
An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs
and expenses in connection therewith for FY 2004/2005, is set forth on the lists
thereof, attached hereto.
Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment
Discuses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The
method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services
provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel.
The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands
within the District for FY 2004/2005, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of
land within the District. These lots and pamels are more particularly described on the
County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County
Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report
Section 4 Annexations
List the developments, which have annexed to the Landscape Maintenance District
within Calendar year 2003.
Section 5 Assessment Diagrams
Shows the boundaries of the areas to be annexed to the Landscape Maintenance
District No. 7 and the general boundaries of the District. For details regarding the
boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within
the Landscape Maintenance District No. 7, refer to the San Bernardino County
Assessor's maps.
Section I - Description of Improvements:
Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (LMD #7) represents landscape sites
throughout the Etiwanda North Area. These sites are associated with areas within that
district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly
attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required
for this district are charged to those parcels within that district.
The various sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands,
paseos, street trees, community trails and Etiwanda Creek Park.
The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows:
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7
SITE LOCATIONS
Site # Descriptive Location
EN-1 The Northside of Wilson from San Sevaine to Ridgeline: The Eastside of
Ridgeline from Wilson to Arcadia, The southside of Arcadia from Ridgeline to
77 feet east of Ridgeline.
Ground Cover area 27,325 square feet
Turf area: 19,334 square feet
EN-2 The Metropolitan Water District easement on the Southside of Crescenta
Way from San Marino to Ridgeline.
Ground Cover area: 38,104 square feet
Turf area: 411250 square feet
EN-3 The Wilson Median from Wardman Bullock to San Sevaine.
Ground Cover area: 15,706 square feet
EN-4 The Planters on the northside of the drainage easement that is between and
parallel to Highland and Arapaho east of Etiwanda Ave.
Ground Cover area: 63,972 square feet
EN-5 The southside of Wilson from 1,115 feet west of San Sevaine to 205 feet
east of San Sevaine. The Landscape east of San Sevaine from
24th to south end tract.
Ground Cover area: 45,584 square feet
2
Turf area: 3,527 square feet
EN-6 The northside of Wilson from Wardman Bullock to Ridgeline. The westside
of Ridgeline from Wilson to 120 feet north of Arcadia.
Ground Cover area: 29,226 square feet
Turf area: 15,136 square feet
EN-7 The parkway on the eastside of Wardman Bullock from 24th street to 857
feet north of Glendora. The cobblestone between the tract wall and the flood
wall will be handled as as extra for debris pickup and weed control on an as
needed basis.
Ground Cover area: 10,268 square feet
EN-8 The southside of Crescenta Way from Ridgeline to Crestline.
Ground Cover area: 501305 square feet
Turf area: 351960 square feet
The following sites have not been accepted and are not a part of this contract as of 1-
14-98. These sites will be added when they have been accepted by the city.
EN-9 The paseo from Meadow Brook to Rock Creek Road.
Ground Cover area: 1,400 square feet
Turf area: 6,555 square feet
EN-10 The paseo from Etiwanda to North Rim Way. The westside of Etiwanda from
175 feet north of North Rim Way to 171 feet south of Golden Prarie Drive.
Ground Cover area: 49,020 square feet
Turf area: 4,445 square feet
EN-11
-~'~ill the city's property.
Old Ground Cover area: ,548 square feet
Old Turf area: 800 square feet
EN-12 The cul-de-sac on the northside of Ridgecrest at Etiwanda Creek Channel.
Ground Cover area: 1,870 square feet
Turf area: 700 square feet
EN-13 The east side of San Sevaine from Wilson to 136 feet north of Crescenta.
Ground Cover area: 3_ 0,473 square feet
Turf area: 5,037 square feet
EN-14 The west side of San Sevaine from 150' north of Wilson to 136' north of
Crescenta.
Ground Cover area: 551166 square feet
Turf area: 235 square feet
EN-15 The north side of Youngs Canyon Road from 500 feet east of Koch to 692
feet west of Koch. The south side of Youngs Canyon Road from 349 feet
east of Koch to 692 feet west of Koch. The east and west side of Koch
place from Youngs Canyon Road to 132 feet north of Youngs Canyon Road.
The west side of Koch from Youngs Canyon Road to 132 feet south of
Youngs Canyon Road. The east side of Koch from 82 feet south of Youngs
Canyon Road to Youngs Canyon Road. The trailhead north east of the east
end of Youngs Canyon Road to the south end of San Sevaine Horse Trail.
The south end of San Sevaine Horse from the trail head to 254 feet north of
trailhead.
Ground Cover area:4 2,925 square feet
EN-16 The east side of Wardman Bullock from 225 feet south of San Segundo
Drive to 80 feet north of Dona Way.
Ground Cover area: 2,056 square feet
EN-17 The north side of Colonbero from San Sevaine Channel to Guidera Drive.
The south side of Colonbero from San Sevaine Channel to 400 feet north of
Guidera Drive. The north side of Aggazzotti from Colonbero to 475 feet east
of Colonbero. This site has a pump which will be adjusted and maintained
by city personnel.
Ground Cover area: 43,241 square feet
EN-18 The north side of Aggazzotti Road from San Antonio Drive to San $evaine
Road. The west side of San Sevaine road from Aggazzotti to 702 feet south
of Aggazzotti. The East side of San Sevaine Road from 702 feet south of
Aggazzotti to Regina.
Ground Cover area: 47,823 square feet
EN-19 The south side of Wilson from Etiwanda to Estates Way.
Ground Cover area: 45,727 square feet
EN-20 The southside or Wilson from Estates Way to Hanley.
Ground Cover area: 14,207 square feet
EN-21 The north side of Wilson from Etiwanda to Cervantes. The Wilson meidan
from Etiwanda To Cervantes. The Westside of Etiwanda From Wilson To
Del Notre Place.
EN-22 Not accepted as of July 22, 2002.
EN-23 The north side of Wilson and median from Etiwanda west to Etiwanda. The
eastside of Etiwanda from Wilson to 1150 feet north of Wilson.
Ground Cover area: 32,027 square feet
EN-24 The north side of Vintage from 360 feet west of Ascot to 230 feet east of
Countrywood.
Ground Cover area: 34,707 square feet
EN-25 Not accepted as of July 22, 2002
5
Section 2 - Estimate of Costs and Expenses:
The budgeted costs for LMD #7 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover,
shrubs and the neighborhood park. These functions, along with tree maintenance and
certain irrigation system repair and testing, are performed through a Contract Services
Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The
projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #7 are as follows:
Regular Payroll 108,980.00
Part-time Salaries 7,500.00
Fringe Benefits 40,470.00
Subtotal Personnel $156,950.00
Operations
Maintenance and Operations
Landscaping $24,070.00
Trees $3,000.00
Parks $13,100.00
Facilities $4,000.00
Vehicle Maintenance and Operations $3,620.00
Emergency & Routine Vehicle Equipment Rental $500.00
Equipment Maintenance $610.00
Utilities
Water Utilities $49,000.00
Telephone Utilities $3,150.00
Electric Utilities $17,100.00
Contract Services
Parkway & Median Landscape Maintenance $250,530.00
CCWD Manditory Annual Backflow Cert. $3,500.00
Tree Maintenance $13,100.00
Parks $10,000.00
Facilities $5,000.00
Subtotal Operations $400,280.00
Assessment Administration and General Overhead $44,400.00
Total LMD #7 Expenditure Budget $610,630.00
Less Prior Year District Carryover $110,138.50
Assessment Revenue Required $500,491.50
Section 3 - Method of Assessment Apportionment:
A. General
The 1972 Act permits the establishments of assessment districts for the
purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction,
maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The
1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to
benefit rather than assessed value:
"The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may
be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount
among afl assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be
received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements."
The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects
the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly
apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel.
B. Assessment Methodology
Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to
relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent
Dwelling Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit
of assessment. A single family home equals one The Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU).
Every other land-use is converted to EDU's based on an assessment formula that
equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use),
and size of the property, as compared to a single-family home (SFR).
The EDU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most
appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts
formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are
apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table
provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each
parcel's EDU.
LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS
Property Type EDU Value Multiplier
Single Family 1.00 Parcel
Comm/Ind 2.00 Acre
it is recommended that the rate per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU.) remain at
$307.05 for the FY 2004/2005. The following table summarizes the assessment rate
for the district:
# of # of Rate per
Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue
Single Family Parcel 1620 1.00 1620 $307.05 $497,421.00
Comm/Ind Acre 5 2.00 10 $307.05 $3,070.50
Total $500,491.50
C. Assessment
All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment
role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and hereby
made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the
net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal
Year 2004/2005, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the
District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County
assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor
and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report.
Section 4 - Annexations:
Calendar Year 2003 Annexations
Landscape Maintenance District No. 7
TR 16116 3/19/2003 48 SF
Total 48
Section 5 - Assessment Diagrams:
Landscape Maintenance District 7
Hillside I
Une Rd
Annual Engineer's Report
Fiscal Year 2004/2005
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Landscape Maintenance District No. 8
(South Etiwanda)
ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT
Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 8
(South Etiwanda)
City of Rancho Cucamonga
San Bernardino County, State of California
This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the
improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year
2003/2004, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention.
Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a
detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The
undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council.
Dated this 17th day of March, 2004.
Approved ~ ~ ,
/ William J. 0 Nei~it~, Engineer
[!
TABLE OF CONTENTS
OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................................. 1
SECTION 1 - DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS: ............................................. 2
SECTION 2 - ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES: ....................................... 3
SECTION 3 - METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT: ..................... 4
A. GENERAL .......................................................................................................................... 4
B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................... 4
C. ASSESSMENT ..................................................................................................................... 5
SECTION 4 - ANNEXATIONS: ....................................................................................... 6
SECTION 5 - ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS: ................................................................. 7
III
Overview
The FY 2003/2004 Annual Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 (South
Etiwanda) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1,
Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape
and Light Act of 1972).
Section 1 Description of Improvements
The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Assessment District
consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the
improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto.
Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses
An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs
and expenses in connection therewith for FY 2003/2004, is set forth on the lists
thereof, attached hereto.
Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment
Discuses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The
method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services
provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel.
The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands
within the District for FY 2003/2004, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of
land within the District. These lots and pamels are more particularly described on the
County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County
Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report
Section 4 Annexations
List the developments, which have annexed to the Landscape Maintenance District
within Calendar year 2003.
Section 5 Assessment Diagrams
Shows the boundaries of the areas to be annexed to the Landscape Maintenance
District No. 8 and the general boundaries of the District. For details regarding the
boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within
the Landscape Maintenance District No. 8, refer to the San Bernardino County
Assessor's maps.
Section 1 - Description of Improvements:
Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 (LMD #8) represents landscape sites
throughout the Etiwanda South Area. These sites are associated with areas within that
district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly
attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required
for this district are charged to those parcels within that district.
The various sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands,
paseos, street trees and community trails.
The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows:
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8
SITE LOCATIONS
Site # Descriptive Location
Es-1 The eastside of East Ave. from 480 feet south of Catalpa to 182 feet
north of Catalpa. The north and south side of Catalpa from; East Ave. to
Brownstone.
Ground Cover area: 10,355 square feet
Turf area: 6,258 square feet
Es-2 The south side of Highland from 361 feet east of East Avenue, to 210
feet East of Starstone.
Ground Cover area: 16,686 square feet
Es-3 The south side of Fischer from 860 feet West of Mulberry to Mulberry.
Ground Cover area: 6,630 square feet
LMD-8 TOTAL GROUND COVER: 33,671 square feet
LMD-8 TOTAL TURF: 6,258 square feet
2
Section 2 - Estimate of Costs and Expenses:
The budgeted costs for LMD #8 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover,
shrubs and the neighborhood park. These functions, along with tree maintenance and
certain irrigation system repair and testing, are performed through a Contract Services
Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The
projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #8 are as follows:
Operations
Maintenance and Operations
Landscaping $2,080.00
Vehicle Maintenance and Operations $1,400.00
Utilities
Water Utilities $3,230.00
Telephone Utilities $530.00
Electric Utilities $420.00
Contract Services
Parkway & Median Landscape Maintenance $16,185.20
Subtotal Operations $23,845.20
Assessment Administration and General Overhead $2,810.00
Total LMD #8 Expenditure Budget $26,655.20
Prior Year District Carryover $0.00
Assessment Revenue Required $26,655.20
Section 3 - Method of Assessment Apportionment:
A. General
The 1972 Act permits the establishments of assessment districts for the
purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction,
maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The
1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to
benefit rather than assessed value:
"The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may
be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount
among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be
received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements."
The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects
the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly
apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel.
B. Assessment Methodology
Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to
relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent
Dwelling Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit
of assessment. A single family home equals one The Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU).
Every other land-use is converted to EDU's based on an assessment formula that
equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use),
and size of the property, as compared to a single-family home (SFR).
The EDU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most
appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts
formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are
apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table
provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each
pamel's EDU.
LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS
Property Type EDU Value Multiplier
Single Family 1.00 Parcel
4
It is recommended that the rate per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU.) remain at
$151.45 for the FY 2003/2004. The following table summarizes the assessment rate
for the district:
# of # of Rate per
Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
Land Use Unit Type Units Unit Factor Units Unit Revenue
Single Family Parcel 176 1.0 176 $151.45 $26,655.20
C. Assessment
All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment
role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and hereby
made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the
net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal
Year 2003/2004, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the
District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County
assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor
and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report.
Section 4 - Annexations:
Calendar Year 2003 Annexations
Landscape Maintenance District No. 8
PROJECT UNITS ANNEX DATE
TR 16302 23 SF 5/7/2003
Section 5 - Assessment Diagrams:
Landscape Maintenance District 8
§
§
Base Une Rd
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
/
VICINITY MAP
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.2001-01
EXHIBIT A
Annual Engineer's Report
Fiscal Year 2004/2005
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Landscape Maintenance District No. 9
(Lower Etiwanda)
ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT
Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 9
(Lower Etiwanda)
City of Rancho Cucamonga
San Bernardino County, State of California
This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the
improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year
2004/2005, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention.
Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a
detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The
undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council.
Dated this 17th day of March, 2004.
J. O'Neil, Cit~y Engineer
TABLE OF CONTENTS
OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................................. 1
SECTION 1 - DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS: ............................................. 2
SECTION 2 - ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES: ....................................... 4
SECTION 3 - METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT: ..................... 5
A. GENERAL .......................................................................................................................... 5
B. ASSESSMENT IVIETHODOLOGY ........................................................................................... 5
C. ASSESSMENT ..................................................................................................................... 6
SECTION 4 - ANNEXATIONS: ....................................................................................... 7
SECTION 5 - ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS: ................................................................. 8
III
Overview
The FY 2004/2005 Annual Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 (Lower
Etiwanda) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1,
Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape
and Light Act of 1972).
Section 1 Description of Improvements
The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Assessment District
consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the
improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto.
Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses
An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs
and expenses in connection therewith for FY 2004/2005, is set forth on the lists
thereof, attached hereto.
Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment
Discuses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The
method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services
provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel.
The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands
within the District for FY 2004/2005, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of
land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the
County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County
Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report
Section 4 Annexations
List the developments, which have annexed to the Landscape Maintenance District
within Calendar year 2003.
Section 5 Assessment Diagrams
Shows the boundaries of the areas to be annexed to the Landscape Maintenance
District No. 9 and the general boundaries of the District. For details regarding the
boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within
the Landscape Maintenance District No. 9, refer to the San Bernardino County
Assessor's maps.
Section 1 - Description of Improvements:
Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 (LMD #9) represents landscape sites
throughout the Lower Etiwanda Area. These sites are associated with areas within
that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be
directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments
required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district.
The various sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands and
street trees.
The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows:
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 9
SITE LOCATIONS
Site # Descriptive Location
9-1 The west side of East Ave. from 380 feet north of Chateau to 290 feet
south of Chateau.
Ground Cover area: 4,426 square feet
Hardscape area: 6,555 square feet
9-2 The west side of East Ave. from 339 feet north of Brookfield to 157 feet
north of Brookfield. Brookfield from East Ave. to Oak Crest. The east
side of Oak Crest to 137 feet north of Brookfield.
Ground Cover area: 2,390 square feet
Hardscape area: 3,333 square feet
9-3 The west side of East Ave. from 790 feet north of Highfield to 256 feet
south of Highfield.
Ground Cover area: 8,769 square feet
Hardscape area: 4,853 square feet
9-4 The west side of East Ave. From 295 feet north of Via Veneto To Via
Veneto. The north side of Via Veneto From East Ave to Dolcetto. The
2
east side of Dolcetto from Via Veneto to Miller Ave. The south side of
Miller Ave from 372 feet west of Dolcetto to 240 feet east of Dolcetto.
The west side of Dolcetto from Miller to Garcia. The north side of
Garcia from Dolcetto to Etiwanda Ave.
Ground Cover area: 22,748 square feet
Hardscape area: 48,612 square feet
Section 2 - Estimate of Costs and Expenses:
The budgeted costs for LMD #9 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover,
shrubs and the neighborhood park. These functions, along with tree maintenance and
certain irrigation system repair and testing, are performed through a Contract Services
Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The
projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #9 are as follows:
Personnel
Part-time Salaries $5,000.00
Subtotal Personnel $5,000.00
Operations
Maintenance and Operations
Landscaping $10,000.00
Facilities $4,000.00
Emergency & Routine Vehicre Equipment Rental $200.00
Utilities
Water Utilities $10,000.00
Electric Utilities $850.00
Contract Services
Parkway & Median Landscape Maintenance $44,750.00
Tree Maintenance $7,050.00
Facilities $5,560.00
Subtotal Operations $82,410.00
Capital Expenditures
OutlayNehicles $10,650.00
Outlay/Computer $630.00
Subtotal Capital Expenditures $11,280.00
Reserve for Capital Maintenance and Improvements $388,723.00
Assessment Administration and General Overhead $39,358.00
Total LMD #9 Expenditure Budget $524,771.00
Assessment Revenue Required $524,771.00
4
Section 3 - Method of Assessment Apportionment:
A. General
The 1972 Act permits the establishments of assessment districts for the
purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction,
maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The
1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to
benefit rather than assessed value:
"The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may
be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount
among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be
received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements."
The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects
the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly
apportion the costs based on benefit to each pamel.
B. Assessment Methodology
Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to
relate the different types of pamel improvements to each other. The Equivalent
Dwelling Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit
of assessment. A single family home equals one The Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU).
Every other land-use is converted to EDU's based on an assessment formula that
equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use),
and size of the property, as compared to a single-family home (SFR).
The EDU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most
appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts
formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are
apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table
provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each
parcel's EDU.
LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS
Property Type EDU Value Multiplier
Single Family 1.00 Pamel
Multi-Family 1.00 Unit
It is recommended that the rate per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU.) remain at
$375.91 for the FY 2004/2005. The following table summarizes the assessment rate
for the district:
# of # of Rate per
Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
Land Use Unit Type Units Unit Factor Units Unit Revenue
Single Family Parcel 594 1.0 594 $375.91 $223,290.54
Multi-Family Unit 802 1 802 $375.91 $301,479.82
Total $524,770.36
C. Assessment
All assessed lots or pamels within the District are listed on the assessment
role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and hereby
made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the
net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal
Year 2004/2005, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the
District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County
assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor
and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report.
6
Section 4 - Annexations:
Calendar Year 2003 Annexations
Landscape Maintenance District No. 9
PROJECT UNITS ANNEX DATE
CUP 99-56 11.31 AC 4/16/2003
TR 16335 110 MF 12/3/2003
7
Section 5 - Assessment Diagrams:
Landscape Maintenance District 9
Wilson Av
~se Une Rd
BASELINE ROAD
MtLLER AVE.
PI~OJECT SITE
FOOTHILL (RT 66) BOULEVARD
ARROW ROUTE
CITY OF rrF~~
RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~rr~.~.--b~~?.Y''_~A~_~
~G~G D~0N '. ._
· ' " /-~
EXHIBIT "A ~' ~ #
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 9
STREET I~IGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 8
MILLER
PROJECT
FO O T~ liL L :BOULE'VAR[!
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NORTI~
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
HIGHLAND AVENUE
~CTOR~ ~REET
PROJECT
SASE UNE '~
CITY OF n'zM:~
RANCHO CUCAMONGA TI~,~,:~
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 9
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 8
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONC;A
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Annual Engineer's Report
Fiscal Year 2004/2005
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Landscape Maintenance District No. 10
(Rancho Etiwanda)
ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT
Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 10
(Rancho Etiwanda)
City of Rancho Cucamonga
San Bernardino County, State of California
This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the
improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year
2004/2005, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention.
Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a
detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The
undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council.
Dated this 17th day of March, 2004.
Ap p roved by'~_,~/(¢¢(, ~<"/~
v/ William J. O'Neil~City Engineer
[!
TABLE OF CONTENTS
OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................................. 1
SECTION 1 - DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS: ............................................. 2
SECTION 2 - ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES: ....................................... 3
SECTION 3 - METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT: ..................... 4
A. GENERAL .......................................................................................................................... 4
B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................... 4
C. ASSESSMENT ..................................................................................................................... 5
SECTION 4 - ANNEXATIONS: ....................................................................................... 6
SECTION 5 - ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS: ................................................................. 7
III
Overview
The FY 2004/2005 Annual Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 (Rancho
Etiwanda) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1,
Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape
and Light Act of 1972).
Section 1 Description of Improvements
The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Assessment District
consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the
improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto.
Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses
An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs
and expenses in connection therewith for FY 2004/2005, is set forth on the lists
thereof, attached hereto.
Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment
Discuses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The
method reflects the composition of the pamels, and the improvements and services
provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel.
The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands
within the District for FY 2004/2005, and describes each assessable lot or pamel of
land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the
County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County
Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report
Section 4 Annexations
List the developments, which have annexed to the Landscape Maintenance District
within Calendar year 2003.
Section 5 Assessment Diagrams
Shows the boundaries of the areas to be annexed to the Landscape Maintenance
District No. 10 and the general boundaries of the District. For details regarding the
boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within
the Landscape Maintenance District No. 10, refer to the San Bernardino County
Assessor's maps.
Section 1 - Description of Improvements:
Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 (LMD #10) represents landscape sites
throughout the Rancho Etiwanda Area. These sites are associated with areas within
that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be
directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments
required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district.
The various sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, street
trees and a neighborhood park.
The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows:
2004/2005
Ground Cover, Shrubs and Turf 5.61
Parks 10.40
Total Area 10.40 Acres
Ground cover, shrubs and turf areas that make up parkways, median islands and
paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company.
Parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews.
Section 2 - Estimate of Costs and Expenses:
The budgeted costs for LMD #10 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover,
shrubs and the neighborhood park. These functions, along with tree maintenance and
certain irrigation system repair and testing, are performed through a Contract Services
Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The
projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #10 are as follows:
Personnel
Over Time $2,000.00
Pad-time Salaries $12,000.00
Subtotal Personnel $14,000.00
Operations
Maintenance and Operations
Landscaping $42,000.00
Parks $6,000.00
Facilities $8,000.00
Emergency & Routine Vehicle Equipment Rental $2,000.00
Equipment Maintenance $4,000.00
Utilities $0.00
Water Utilities $73,655.00
Electric Utilities $21,340.00
Contract Services $0.00
Parkway & Median Landscape Maintenance $17,000.00
Facilities $18,000.00
Tree Maintenance $5,000.00
Subtotal Operations $196,995.00
Capital Expenditures
Outlay/Vehicles $24,850.00
Subtotal Capital Expenditures $24,850.00
Reserve for Capital Maintenance and Improvements $139,130.00
Total LMD #10 Expenditure Budget $374,975.00
Assessment Revenue Required $374,975.00
Section 3 - Method of Assessment Apportionment:
A. General
The 1972 Act permits the establishments of assessment districts for the
purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction,
maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The
1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to
benefit rather than assessed value:
"The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may
be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount
among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be
received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements."
The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects
the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly
apportion the costs based on benefit to each pamel.
B. Assessment Methodology
Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to
relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent
Dwelling Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit
of assessment. A single family home equals one The Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU).
Every other land-use is converted to EDU's based on an assessment formula that
equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use),
and size of the property, as compared to a single-family home (SFR).
The EDU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most
appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts
formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are
apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table
provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each
parcel's EDU.
LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS
Property Type EDU Value Multiplier
Non-Residential Improved 2.00 Acres
Single Family Residential 1.00 Unit
4
It is recommended that the rate per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU.) remain at
$597.09 for the FY 2004/2005. The following table summarizes the assessment rate
for the district:
Cf Of Rate per
Cf Of Equivalent Equivalent Equivalent
Unit Physical Dwelling Dwelling Dwelling
Land Use Type Units Unit Factor Units Unit Revenue
Single Family Unit 628 1.00 628 $597.09 $374,972.52
Total $374,972.52
C. Assessment
All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment
role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and hereby
made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the
net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal
Year 2004/2005, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the
District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County
assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor
and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report.
5
Section 4 - Annexations:
Calendar Year 2003 Annexations
Landscape Maintenance District No. 10
PROJECT UNITS ANNEX DATE
TR 16306 26 SF 11/19/2003
Section 5 - Assessment Diagrams:
7
Landscape Maintenance District 16
Arrow Rt
LEGEND
WILSON AVE.
VINTAGE DR.
i¢~"~ PROJECT SITE
ROUTE ZtO , ',
V~ MAP
NOT TO SCALE
·
NORTH
]IANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: VIC#fi/7"}f/~Aff>
{~KHIBIT "A"- 4'
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 10
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7 ·
CITY OF ~NCHO CUCAMONGA NO~rH
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFO~IA T~.