The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2004/04/21 - Agenda Packet CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10500 Civic Center Drive ~ Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730-3801 AGENDAS · Redevelopment Agency · Fire Protection District · City Council REGULAR MEETINGS 1st and 3ra Wednesdays + 7:00 p.m. APRIL 21, 2004 AGENCY~ BOARD & CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS William J. Alexander .................... Mayor Diane Williams ............... Mayor Pro Tern Rex Gutierrez ............................ Member Robert J. Howdyehell ............... Member Donald J. Kurth, M.D ................ Member Jack Lam ......................... City Manager James L. Markman ............. City Attorney Debra J. Adams ..................... City Clerk ORDER OF BUSINESS 5:30 p.m. Closed Session .................... Tapia Conference Room 7:00 p.m. Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting... Council Chambers Regular Fire Protection District Meeting ... Council Chambers Regular City Council Meeting ............. Council Chambers INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL The City Council encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the Agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the City Council on any agenda item. Please sign in on the clipboard located at the desk behind the staff table. It is important to list your name, address and phone number. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under "Public Communications". Them is opportunity to speak under this section at the beginning and the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the City Council should be given to the City Clerk for distribution. To address the City Council, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. All items to be placed on a City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, one week prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's office receives all such items. AGENDA BACK-UP MATERIALS Staff reports and back-up materials for agenda items are available for review at the City Clerk's counter and the Public Library. A complete copy of the agenda is also available at the sign in desk located behind the staff table during the Council meeting. LIVE BROADCAST Council meetings are broadcast live on Channel 3 for those with cable television access. Meetings are rebroadcast on the second and fourth Wednesdays of each month at 11:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. The City has added the option for customers without cable access to view the meetings "on-demand" from their computers. The added feature of "Streaming Video On Demand" is available on the City's website at www.ci.rancho- cucamonga.ca.us/whatsnew.htm for those with Hi-bandwidth (DSL/Cable Modem) or Low-bandwidth (Dial-up) Intemet service. The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers Located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Members of the City Council also sit as the Redevelopment Agency and the Fire District Board. Copies of City Council agendas and minutes can be found at http:llwww, ci. rancho-cucamonga, ca.us IIf you need special ass stance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please ~ contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477-2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the ~'~,~ meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. ~ Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA APPdL 21, 2004 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY CUCKMONGA HALL, 10500 Civic CENTER DRIVE A. CALL TO ORDER 1. Roll Call: Alexander __, Gutierrez __, Howdyshell__, Kurth__, and Williams__. B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS I. Presentation of a Proclamation to the First 5 San Bernardino Commission in recognition of their significant contributions to the City's Youth Enrichment Services (YES) Program. 2. Presentation by Dennis Yates, Board Member, AQMD. 3. Presentation of a Proclamation declaring April 18 - 24, 2004 "National Victim's Week." C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS I This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. D. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS [ This is the time and place for reports to be made by members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda. E. CONSENT CA1,ENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember or member of the audience for discussion. 1. Approval of Minutes: March 31,2004 (Special Meeting) April 7, 2004 2. Approval of Warrants, Register 3/26/2004 through 4/12/2004, and 1 Payroll ending 4/12/04, for the total amount of $3,626,186.05. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA APRiL 21, 2004 -- 7:00 P.M. 2 cRAIqCHO THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY UCAMONGA HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE 3. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of March 23 31, 2004. 4. Approval to award a contract to Delta MicroimagJng, Inc. (CO 04- 036) of Fresno, California, for backfile conversion services in an 29 annual amount not to exceed $40,000 for the period of April 21, 2004 through April 20, 2005, with an option to renew for additional one-year periods upon review and confirmation of pricing and mutual consent, up to a total of three years, to be funded from 1016-301- 530. 5. Approval of a Community Facilities District Advance and Reimbursement Agreement with BCA Development (CO 04-037). 53 6. Approval to appropriate funds received from the U.S. Department of 62 Housing and Urban Development for a grant in the amount of $804,735 for construction of a Senior Center at Central Park, Fund 1239303-5650/1496239-0. 7. Review and confirmation of Epicenter improvements proposed by 63 Valley Baseball, Inc. 8. Approval of Amendment No. 4 to the Amended and Restated Lease Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Valley 64 Baseball, Inc., relating to reduction in available parking spaces in Parking Lot G and change in reimbursement for the Expanded Parking Lot. 9. Approval of Amendment No. 5 to the Amended and Restated Lease Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Valley 67 Baseball, Inc., relating to replacement of the Scoreboard. 10. Approval of Parcel Map 16238 and monumentation cash deposit located at the southwest corner of Milliken Avenue and 6 h Street, 69 submitted by Silver Oak Development. RESOLUTION NO. 04-125 71 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP 16238 AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT 11. Approval to authorize the City Manager and/or his designee to sign the Distribution and Service Extension Agreement with Regency 72 Realty Group, Inc. (CO 04-038) and future distribution and service extension agreements along with amendments thereto for the extension of electric utilities within the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal utility Service Area. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA APPaL 21, 2004 - 7:00 P.M. 3 C~U~,rCHO THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY UGAMONGA HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE 12. Approval to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 74 13835, located on the northeast corner of Highland Avenue and Rochester Avenue, submitted by Sheffield Homes, LLC. 13. Approval to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 13851 located north of Wilson Avenue and west of Deer Creek Channel, 76 submitted by DPDG Fund I, LLC. 14. Approval to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bonds for Trac 13270, located on the northwest corner of Milliken Avenue and Church 78 Street, submitted by Lewis Homes. 15. Approval to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bonds for Tract 79 15875-1, located on the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard, submitted by Kaufman and Broad of Southern California, Inc. 16. Approval to release the Faithful Performance Bend, No. 612882, in the 8'1 amount of $50,855.00 for the In-Roadway Warning Lights at 19th Street (SR 30) and Jasper Street, Contract No. 02-091. 17. Approval of Improvement Agreement extension, for Tract 16116, 83 located at the southwest corner of Banyan Street and East Avenue, submitted by KB Home Greater Los Angeles, Inc. RESOLUTION NO. 04-126 86 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 16116 F. CONSENT ORDINANCES The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non- controversial. The Council will act upon them at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion. No Items Submitted. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA APRIL 21, 2004 - 7:00 P.M. 4 c~CHO THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY UCAMONGA HALL, 10500 Civic CENTER DRIVE G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. 1. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND 87 DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2001-00534 CABOT INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES, L.P. - A request to amend the circulation within the Industrial Park Development District, Subarea 6, to eliminate Center Avenue from 6th Street south to Trademark Parkway, submitted by Cabot Industrial Properties - APN's 209-072- 06, -11, -16, -17 and -35. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impacts for consideration. RESOLUTION NO. 04-127 92 A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT CODE PER DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2001-00534 - AMENDING THE CIRCULATION WITHIN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, SUBAREA 6, TO ELIMINATE CENTER AVENUE FROM 6TM STREET SOUTH TO TRADEMARK PARKWAY AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 209-072, -11, -16, -17 AND -35. ORDINANCE NO. 722 (first reading) 94 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2001-00534, TO AMEND THE STREET CIRCULATION WITHIN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, SUBAREA 6, ELIMINATING THE EXTENSION OF CENTER AVENUE FROM 6TM STREET SOUTH TO TRADEMARK PARKYVAY BY AMENDING SECTION 17.30.080, FIGURE 17.30.080-H OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA DEVELOPMENT CODE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF CITY COUNCIL AGENDA APRIL 21, 2004 - 7:00 P.M. 5 cRANcHO THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY IJCAMONGA HALL, 10800 CIvic CENTER DRIVE H. PUBLIC HEARINGS I The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. 1. CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL OF USE DETERMINATION DRC;, 100 2004-00093 - STEVE KNECHT - An appeal of the Planning Commission's decision denying a request to determine that a dog breeding establishment with outside runs is similar to an animal care facility within the Very Low Residential District at 10158 Sun Valley - APN: 1074-081-12. RESOLUTION NO. 04-128 128 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, UPHOLDING THE ACTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND DENYING THE APPEAL OF USE DETERMINATION DRC2004-00093, BY DETERMINING THAT DOG BREEDING ESTABLISHMENTS WITH OUTSIDE RUNS ARE NOT SIMILAR TO AN ANIMAL CARE FACILITY WITHIN THE VERY LOW (.1-2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF I. CITY i~ANAGER~S STAFF REPORTS The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. No Items Submitted. J. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. 1. PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICE~ UPDATE 131 2. ANIMAL SHELTER AD HOC SUBCOMMITTEE UPDATF 142 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA APRIL 21, 2004 - 7:00 P.M. 6 cg~,,c.o THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY L~-.~IONGA HALL, 'J 0500 Civic CENTER DRIVE 3. DECISION ON THE REQUEST OF DOUGLAS E. BARNHART, INC., 147 TO SUBSTITUTE COAST ROOF CO. FOR ZSOLT KISS, INC., DBA GOLDEN STATE ROOFING, ON THE CENTRAL PARK SENIOR/COMMUNITY CENTER PROJECT RESOLUTION NO. 04-129 155 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, MAKING FINDINGS, DENYING OBJECTIONS, AND APPROVING THE REQUEST OF DOUGLAS E. BARNHART, INC., TO SUBSTITUTE COAST ROOF CO. FOR ZSOLT KISS, INC., DBA GOLDEN STATE ROOFING, ON THE CENTRAL PARK SENIOR/COMMUNITY CENTER PROJECT K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR THE NEXT MEETING This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this meeting, only identified for the next meeting. L. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS [ This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. M. ADJOU MENT I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on April 15, 2004, seventy two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. March 31, 2004 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Special Meeting A. CALL TO ORDER A special meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, March 17, 2004, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor William J. Alexander called the meeting to order at 5:33 p.m. Present were Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, Robed J. Howdyshell, Donald J. Kurth, M.D. (arrived at 5:34 p.m.), Diane Williams (arrived at 5:35 p.m.) and Mayor William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager; Linda D. Daniels, RDA Director; Flavio Nunez, RDA Analyst; Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director; Tamara Layne, Finance Officer; Rose Colum, Budget Analyst; Helen Leeds, Sr. Accountant; Shelly Munson, Information Systems Specialist; Sam Davis, Information Systems Specialist; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Brad Buller, City Planner; Trang Huynh, Building Official; John Thomas, Plan Check ManagedFire; Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director; Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III; Deborah Clark, Library Director; Captain Pete Ortiz, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; Fire Chief Dennis Michael and Battalion Chief Peter Bryan, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst III; Kimberly Thomas, Management Analyst II; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. II B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS I B1. Melanie Ingrain asked if this information could be videotaped and shown on Channel 3 so the public will know more about the City's budget. Mayor Alexander felt a synopsis could possibly be prepared and put on Channel 3. Ms. Ingram pointed out that the City of Upland held a special Council meeting this morning at 8:00 for an impodant item pertaining to the Colonies project. She expressed her disapproval of how this was done. She also asked that a staff report be given for the Consent Calendar item so that the public has more information about it. She felt this should also be done at a regular City Council meeting. [[ C. CONSENT CALENDAR I C1. Approval to authorize the City Engineer to execute Hazard Mitigation Grant Applications for DR 1498 and to file said applications in the Governor's Office of Emergency Services. Staff report presented by Joe O'Neil, City Engineer. City Council Minutes March 31,2004 Page 2 RESOLUTION NO. 04-102 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER TO EXECUTE HAZARD MITIGATION GRANT APPLICATIONS, PREPARED FOR DR 1498, AND TO FILE SAID APPLICATIONS IN THE GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES MOTION: Moved by Howdyshell, seconded by Williams to approve Resolution No. 04-102. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. I D1. STUDY SESSION - FISCAL YEAR 2004/05 PRE-BUDGET DISCUSSION~ A power point presentation was given by Jack Lam, which is on file in the City Clerk's office. Councilmember Kurth stated he was concerned where the money was going to come from so that public safety does not have to be cut. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated there are cuts in every department's budget to help with the shortfall. Councilmember Williams did not feel any services should be diminished and that street improvements should be kept up also. She stated she is reluctant to diminish our reserves and felt a minimum should be set so that we do not go under that amount. She stated she did not want development to slow down because there is not enough City staff to assist with plan checks, inspections, etc. She felt this area should be looked into because she did not feel there were enough staff. Mayor Alexander did not feel there were enough staff in Planning to get the projects through the process. He stated public safety is very important, but felt public safety might also have to take a hit. He felt Assemblyman Dutton would be a friend to the City after talking to him yesterday. He felt the City might need to go to the voters for a special tax to backfill revenue for services. He felt the City should suppod the League's initiative. He did not feel the City should dip into reserves too often, but should to help out if needed. He felt these issues should be dealt with individually and felt we should see if the community will go for a tax through a special election. Councilmember Howdyshell did not feel we can keep cutting City employees without cutting public safety also. He stated he likes the backfills that the City Manager has come up with and that he looks forward to some additional meetings to discuss this further. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he also likes Assemblyman Dutton, but did not feel there would be a legislative solution very soon. He stated the last option he would go to is to raise taxes. He stated he hopes that the big projects in the City will increase revenue enough so that taxes do not have to be raised. He wanted to know if sales tax could be counted on to help the City survive. He hoped that sales tax could be secure enough to help the City. He stated all the departments are important. Councilmember Williams commented that she and other City representatives got to speak to Brulte and Longville while waiting at the airport yesterday and had some good discussions. She stated the Fullerton Library charges for non-resident library cards. She suggested our Library Board check into this matter. She stated many cities are doing this and felt our library should do the same. City Council Minutes March 31,2004 Page 3 Mayor Alexander reiterated his suggestion to break these issues down into smaller pieces and discuss them further. Jack Lam, City Manager, asked for permission to do the following: · re-examine the PERS rate structure and payment schedules · continue suspension of annual depreciation charges in the general fund · examine a formula to determine how we can transfer funds from the Redevelopment Fire Fund into the Operating Fund of the Fire District MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Williams to approve the policy direction as suggested by the City Manager outlined above. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. MOTION: Moved by Kurth, seconded by Gutierrez to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 6:54 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: April 7, 2004 CITy OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION MINUTES The Rancho Cucamonga City Council held a closed session on Wednesday, April 7, 2004, in the Tapia Room of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 5:30 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander. Present were Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, Robert J. Howdyshell, Donald J. Kurth, M.D., Diane Williams and Mayor William J. Alexander. Aisc present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; and Joe O'Neil, City Engineer. Mayor Alexander announced the closed session items. B1. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY OWNED BY BEST CALIFORNIA GAS, LTD., APN: 227-131-060; JOSEPH O'NEIL, CITY ENGINEER, NEGOTIATING PARTY, REGARDING STATUS OF NEGOTIATIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE - CITY B2. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY OWNED BY BASELINE & 1-15 PROPERTIES, APN: 227-131-059; JOSEPH O'NEIL, CITY ENGINEER, NEGOTIATING PARTY, REGARDING STATUS OF NEGOTIATIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE - CITY B3. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY OWNED BY MOHSEN GHANEIAN AND CIRCUIT CORPORATION, APN: 227-131-54 AND 061; JOSEPH O'NEIL, CITY ENGINEER, NEGOTIATING PARTY, REGARDING STATUS OF NEGOTIATIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE CITY - B4. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(a) REGARDING STATUS OF AND SETTLEMENT NEGOTIATIONS ON THE EMINENT DOMAIN PROCEEDING TITLED CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, ET AL, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CASE NO. RCV 067792. [I c. I No communication was made on the closed session item. City Council Minutes April 7, 2004 Page 2 D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION The closed session began at 5:35 p.m. The closed session recessed at 6:41 p.m. with no action taken. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Re,qu ar Meetin,q A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, April 7, 2004, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor William J. Alexander called the meeting to order at 7:08 p.m. Present were Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, Robert J. Howdyshell, Donald J. Kurth, M.D., Diane Williams and Mayor William J. Alexander. Aisc present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Mike Nelson, Sr. Redevelopment Agency Analyst; James C. Frost, City Treasurer; Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director; Sid Siphomsay, Information Systems Analyst; Shelly Munson, Information Systems Specialist; Dawn Haddon, Purchasing Manager; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Brad Buller, City Planner; Tom Grahn, Associate Planner; Donald Granger, Assistant Planner; Trang Huynh, Building Official; Kevin MoArdle, Community Services Director; Paula Pachon, Management Analyst Ill; Deborah Clark, Library Director; Captain Pete Odiz, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; Fire Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst III; Kimberly Thomas, Management Analyst II; Kathy Scott, Deputy City Clerk; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. B1. Presentation of a Proclamation in recognition of "National Library Week" and update on Telethon 2004. The City Council presented the Proclamation to Deborah Clark, Library Director. City Council Minutes April 7, 2004 Page 3 Deborah Clark, Library Director, talked about the new Library at the Cultural Center and also talked about the upcoming Library Telethon to take place April 16 - 18, 2004. She introduced Ray Wimberly, Library Board President; Paul Williams, Library Foundation President; and Tony Mize, Community Foundation President, and stated they were part of the PAL campaign, which is a campaign promoting arts and literacy and is the backbone of the fundraising for the new cultural center, library and performing arts theater. She then introduced Rebecca Davies. Rebecca Davies, co-chair for the school's subcommittee for the PAL campaign, informed everyone about the campaign and introduced her committee members. Tony Mize, Community Foundation President, talked about the press conference that would be held tomorrow morning at 10:00 at Lions Park, and that a substantial participation for the PAL campaign would be announced. II C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS I C1. John Lyons felt the Bucks for Books campaign is a very good thing. He mentioned the fundraiser that Councilmember Kurth was having tomorrow night for his campaign and that Congressman Gary Miller is helping him out according to the invitation. Mr. Lyons stated once he contacted Congressman Miller he said he is not involved with this, but that he only allowed Councilmember Kurth to use his name. He also mentioned that Councilmember Kurth never retracted the false statement he made that he is running for "re-election". C2. John Shanahan wanted to talk about illegal immigration and an initiative about this. He stated if people would like more information about this they can go to www.save187.com. He stated people can also access the petition from this website so it can be mailed back. [1 ])-COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS D1. Councilmambar Howdyshell wanted to recognize Lois May Smith from the League of Woman Voters and thanked her for her participation at the Council meetings. He stated he wanted to salute Karen Brown from Banyan School for being such a great teacher in the community, D2. Councilmember Gutiarrez stated he attended the grand opening of Ralph's Market at Highland and Day Greek and how wonderful it was to see so many people out to support it. Ha also commented that Ralph's donated $$00 to many of the school's music programs in the community. D3. Councilmember Kurth commented on the progress of the mall and all the work going on in Central Park. He stated yesterday he attended the grand opening of a Noodle Company. He added he felt more fields were needed for the sports teams. D4. Gouncilmember Williams talked about the performance of the Etiwanda Intermediate School jazz band at the Ralph's Market opening. She stated they were invited to a Texas Jazz Festival and what a great job they do. She stated some of the Councilmembers toured the Olen Jones Apartments last week and what a wonderful facility this is for those age 55 and over. She stated she went to the Sheriff's Award Recognition Dinner and talked about the award presented to dodi Miller from the Rancho Cucamonga Station because of her car seat program. City Council Minutes April 7, 2004 Page 4 I[ ~. CONSENT CALENDAR [ El. Approval of Minutes: March 17, 2004 E2. Approval of Warrants, Register 3/6/2004 through 3/25/2004 and Payroll ending 3/25/2004, for the total amount of $7,454,114.36. E3. Approval of plans, specifications and estimates and to authorize the advedising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for improvements in Phase lB(E) of Community Facilities District 2001-01, including landscaping and amenities on Arbor Lane between Church Street and the northerly terminus of Arbor Lane, to be funded from Account Number 16123035650/1442612-0. RESOLUTION NO. 04-103 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS IN PHASE lB(E) OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2001-01, INCLUDING LANDSCAPING AND AMENITIES ON ARBOR LANE BETWEEN CHURCH STREET AND THE NORTHERLY TERMINUS OF ARBOR LANE, IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS E4. Approval to appropriate $178,750 for construction survey services for CFD 2001-01 - Phase 1Bb (north side of Foothill Boulevard west of Day Creek Boulevard, Phase 1Bc (Phase lA Sidewalk & Landscape), Phase 1Bd (Church Street/Etiwanda Avenue Traffic Signal) and Phase 1Be (Arbor Lane Landscaping) to be funded from CFD 2001-01 funds, Acct. No. 16123035300/1442612-0. E5. Approval to authorize a "YES" vote for each city-owned parcel for the Mosquito Control and Disease Prevention Measure by the West Valley Mosquito and Control District. E6. Approval for the purchase of two (2) 2004 Ford Explorers from Fritts Ford of Riverside in the amount of $45,256.38, funded from the Code Enforcement Grant Program (CEGP), Fund. 1244-302-5604. REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION BY HOWDYSHELL. E7. Approval of the purchase of steel pipe and related appurtenances associated with water improvements to be constructed by Phases lB(B), 3B(A), and 3B(B), of Community Facilities Districts 2001-01 and 2003-01, from West Coast Pipe Linings, Inc., for the amount of $116,420.00 and from Inland Water Works Supply Co. for the amount of $49,250.00, to be funded from Acct. Nos. 16123035650/1442612-0 and 16143035650/1442614-0. REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION BY HOWDYSHELL. E8. Approval of a Resolution in support of an Application for Senior Supportive Services Older American Act Title III-B Grant Funds for senior services that promote socialization. RESOLUTION NO. 04-104 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING APPLICATION FOR SENIOR SUPPORTIVE SERVICES FOR OLDER AMERICAN ACT TITLE III-B GRANT FUNDS FOR SENIOR SERVICES THAT PROMOTE SOCIALIZATION City Council Minutes April 7, 2004 Page 5 E9. Approval of sole source vendor selection for the purchase of pads, supplies, and services for the Vactor Storm Drain truck, Elgin Street Sweepers, and Mobile Street Sweeper from Haaker Equipment Company of Pomona for an annual total not to exceed $35,000 for fiscal year 2003/04, with an option to renew annually after review and confirmation of pricing, for additional one year periods, up to a total of three years, to be funded from 1006-303-5250 ($10,000) and 1001-317-5250 ($25,000). REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION BY HOWDYSHELL. El0. Approval of Grant of Easement between City and Southern California Edison which grants Southern California Edison access rights to its portion of the Arbors Electrical Substation located at 8275 Rochester Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 04-105 a RESOLUTION Of THE CITY COUNCIL Of THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO APPROVE A GRANT OF EASEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON REGARDING THE ARBORS ELECTRICAL SUBSTATION LOCATED AT 8275 ROCHESTER AVENUE Ell. Approval of the purchase of irrigation systems repair pads from M & M Irrigation Supply, Inc., of Corona, in an annual amount not to exceed $75,000 for the period of April 7, 2004 through April 6, 2005, with an option to renew for additional one year periods upon review and confirmation of pricing and mutual consent up to a total of three years, to be funded from Acct. Nos. 1001-316-5200 ($14,000); 1130- 303-5200 ($6,000); 1131-303-5200 ($8,700); 1133-303-5200 ($7,000); 1134-303-5200 ($9,100); 1136- 303-5200 ($1,000); 1137-303-5200 ($4,200); 1140-303-5200 ($1,000); 1700-201-5203 ($4,000); and 1848-303-5200 ($20,000}. E12. Approval of Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for Parcel Map 15948, located on the nodh side of 6th Street, east of Archibald Avenue, submitted by Hartwell Corporation, a California Corporation, owner. RESOLUTION NO. 04-106 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR PARCEL MAP 15948 E13. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for DRC2003-00869, located at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and 6th Street, submitted by Atlas Development Corporation. RESOLUTION NO. 04-107 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR DRC2003-00869 RESOLUTION NO. 04-108 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DRC2003-00869 City Council Minutes April 7, 2004 Page 6 E14. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security, Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 3 for Parcel Map No. 16033, located on the southeast corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Foothill Blvd., submitted by O & S Holdings, LLC -APN: 0229-021-62, 63 and 64. RESOLUTION NO. 04-109 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 16033, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTS AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES RESOLUTION NO. 04-110 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 3 FOR PARCEL MAP 16033 E15. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security, Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 and Street Lighting Maintenance Nos. 1 and 3 for Tract No. 16374 located on the southeast corner of Base Line Road and Victoria Park Lane submitted by Standard Pacific Corporation - APN Nos: 227-161-28, 31,33, 35, 36, 38 and 227-171-08, 11, 12, 20, 22, 23, 25. RESOLUTION NO. 04-111 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 16374, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTS, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES RESOLUTION NO. 04-112 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 3 FOR TRACT 16374 E16. Approval of an At-Grade Crossing Agreement (with crossing signal equipment) between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company (BNSF) (CO 04-034) for the proposed widening improvements to the Sixth Street At-Grade Railroad crossing, CPUC Crossing #002-98.10C, located east of Archibald Avenue and west of Lucas Ranch Road, across BNSF's right-of- way designated as MP 96.10, LS 7600, DOT No. 026326R. RESOLUTION NO. 04-113 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AT-GRADE CROSSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMQNGA AND THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY (BNSF), FOR THE PROPOSED WIDENING IMPROVEMENTS TO SIXTH STREET AT-GRADE RAILROAD CROSSING, CPUC CROSSING #002- 98.10-C, LOCATED EAST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND WEST OF LUCAS RANCH ROAD, ACROSS BNSF'S RIGHT OF WAY, DESIGNATED AS MP 98.10, LS7600, DOT NO. 026326R City Council Minutes April 7, 2004 Page 7 E17. Approval to accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $74,236.21 to the apparent Iow bidder, Dye and Browning Construction, Inc. (CO 04-022), and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $7,423.62 for the Beryl Community Trail from Hillside Road to north of Almond Street, to be funded from Beautification funds, Acct. No. 11103035650!1436110-0. E18. Approval of an agreement to dedicate an easement for road purposes for Jack Benny Drive through the Edison power corridor to the west of Day Creek Channel, submitted by Southern Cafifornia Edison on behalf of the developer Guardian Storage Centers (CO-04r023 035). RESOLUTION NO. 04-114 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AGREEMENT TO DEDICATE AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD PURPOSES FOR DRCDR00-17 E19. Approval of a lease agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the West End Family Counseling Services (CO 04-024) to establish an office use within the Norton-Fisher House. RESOLUTION NO. 04-115 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AGREEMENT BETVVEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE WEST END FAMILY COUNSELING SERVICES RELATING TO THE USE OF THE NORTON-FISHER HOUSE AS AN OFFICE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF, APN: 0227-131-24 E20. Approval of a Subordination Agreement (CO 04-025) from Russell L. and Jodi Kay for the property located at 9232 Cottonwood Way (APN: 1062-111-08). RESOLUTION NO. 04-116 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT FROM RUSSELL L. AND JODI KAY AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME E21. Approval to accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $250,770 to the apparent Iow bidder, Mobassaly Engineering, Inc. (CO 04-026), and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $25,077 for the Grove Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation from Arrow Route to Foothill Boulevard, to be funded from Measure "1" funds, Acct. No. 11763035650/1263176-0. E22. Approval and execution of an agreement between San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (CO 04-027) and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the establishment of responsibilities for the funding to complete the remaining items of repair, design and construction of peripheral work relating to the Route 210 construction. E23. Approval to accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $193,049.00 to the apparent Iow bidder, Steiny and Company,/nc. (CO 04-028), and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $19,304.90 for the Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at Los Osos High School, to be funded from Transportation funds, Acct. No. 11243035650/1415124-0 and appropriate an additional amount of $92,500.00 to Acct. No. 11243035650/1415124-0 from Transportation fund balance. City Council Minutes April 7, 2004 Page 8 E24. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 15724, located on the south side of Terra Vista Parkway, east of Coyote Canyon Park, submitted by KB Home Greater Los Angeles, Inc. RESOLUTION NO. 04-117 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 15724 E25. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 16264, located on the south side of Mountain View Drive between Milliken Avenue and Terra Vista Parkway, submitted by KB Home Greater Los Angeles, Inc. RESOLUTION NO. 04-118 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 16264 E26. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a cash surety for maintenance and file a Notice of Completion for Improvements for DRC2002-00187, submitted by 9101 Center Avenue Associates, located on the west side of Center Avenue between 6th and 7th Streets at 9118 Center Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 04-119 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2002-00187 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK E27. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, release the Labor and Material Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for Improvements for DRC2001-00497, located on the west side of Hermosa Avenue, north of 6th Street, submitted by OItmans Construction Company. RESOLUTION NO. 04-120 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2001-00497 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK E28. Approval to accept improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for DRC2001-00718, located at 9471 Buffalo Avenue, submitted by Oltmans Constructions Company. RESOLUTION NO. 04-121 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2001-00716 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF: A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK City Council Minutes April 7, 2004 Page 9 E29. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bonds, and file a Notice of Completion for interior tract improvements for Tract 15814, submitted by Fieldstone Communities Inc., located on the southwest corner of Highland and Rochester Avenues. RESOLUTION NO. 04-122 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE INTERIOR TRACT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 15814 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK E30. Approval to release Faithful Performance Bond No. 3419189 in the amount of $313,174 for the Arrow Route Pavement Rehabilitation from Grove Avenue to Baker Avenue, Contract No. 02-050. E31. Approval to release Faithful Performance Bond No. B34219872 in the amount of $31,810.50 for the Community Trail Fencing and PCC Curb along Summit Trail, south of Summit Avenue, east of Etiwanda Avenue, and along Hillside Trail, north and south of Hillside Road, west of Beryl Street, Contract No. 02- 058. E32. Approval to release Faithful Performance Bond No. UC909600020 in the amount of $191,750.93, for the Archibald Avenue and 19th Street, Southwest Corner Landscape Improvements, Contract No. 02-068. E33. Approval to accept the Haven Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation from Alta Loma Drive to Lemon Avenue, Contract No. 03-031 as complete, retain the Faithful Performance Bond as a Guarantee Bond, release the Labor and Material Bond, and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $74,189.36. RESOLUTION NO. 04-123 A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE HAVEN AVENUE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM ALTA LOMA DRIVE TO LEMON AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. 03-031, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK MOTION: Moved by Kurth, seconded by Gutierrez to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports contained within the Consent Calendar with the exception of items E6, E7 an E9. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. DISCUSSION OF ITEM E6. Approval for the purchase of two (2) 2004 Ford Explorers from Fritts Ford of Riverside in the amount of $45,256.38, funded from the Code Enforcement Grant Program (CEGP), Fund. 1244-302-5604. Councilmember Howdyshell felt the staff report misrepresents what really happened and asked for Dawn Haddon, Purchasing Manager, to correct this so the record is accurate. Dawn Haddon, Purchasing Manager, stated Building and Safety had come to her to discuss specifications for two vehicles they had a need for because of some grant funds they had. She stated that Purchasing had already gone out and awarded a bid for Ford Explorers on February 4. She stated this information was discussed with Building and Safety who said this would meet their needs. She stated Fritts Ford was then notified who stated they would hold the price that was recently awarded. She stated they are asking City Council to approve the purchase of two additional Explorers based on the bid that was awarded on February 4 for the Engineering Explorers. MOTION: Moved by Howdyshell, seconded by Kurth to approve item E6. Motion carried unanimously 5- 0. City Council Minutes April 7, 2004 Page 10 DISCUSSION OF ITEM E7. Approval of the purchase of steel pipe and related appurtenances associated with water improvements to be constructed by Phases lB(B), 3B(A), and 3B(B), of Community Facilities Districts 2001-01 and 2003-01, from West Coast Pipe Linings, Inc., for the amount of $116,420.00 and from Inland Water Works Supply Co. for the amount of $49,250.00, to be funded from Acct. Nos. 16123035650/1442612.0 and 16143035650/1442614.0. DISCUSSION OF ITEM E9. Approval of sole source vendor selection for the purchase of parts, supplies, and services for the.Vactor Storm Drain truck, Elgin Street Sweepers, and Mobile Street Sweeper from Haaker Equipment Company of Pomona for an annual total not to exceed $35,000 for fiscal year 2003~04, with an option to renew annually after review and confirmation of pricing, for additional one year periods, up to a total of three years, to be funded from 1006-303-5250 ($10,000) and 1001-317-5250 ($25,000). Councilmember Howdyshell stated he wanted to ask Mr. O'Neil, City Engineer a question because he did not feel there was a strong effort in negotiating pricing in either of the sole source purchases and asked for additional information. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated the pipe item was one of urgency because the cost of steel being so high. He stated they wanted to purchase it as quickly as possible. He stated this was the only vendor they could find that even had the pipe they could afford. He stated if the project was bid they felt the cost would be substantially higher. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, felt they were basically stuck on the street sweeper issue because of being the only one in town they can buy from and get what they need. Councilmember Howdyshell askedif there wash t someone at the State or County eve they could tag on to. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated no there wasn't at the time. MOTION: Moved by Howdyshell, seconded by Williams to approve items E7 and E9. Motion carried unanimously 5-0 No Items Submitted. II [I G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS I Gl. CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USI- PERMIT DRC2003-00719 - ,JAMES A. MARTIN JR. - The appeal of the Planning Commission decision to approve the development of a 2,947 square foot gas station and convenience store and 2,504 square foot fast food restaurant on 1.48 acres of land in the Village Commercial District, located at the northeast corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Highland Avenue - APN: 1089-121-08 and 1089-401-66. Related files: Preliminary Review DRC2003-00063 and Pre-Application Review DRC2003-00064. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Staff report presented by Donald Granger, Assistant Planner. City Council Minutes April 7, 2004 Page 11 Councilmember Gutierrez brought up these types of businesses being so close to a freeway onramp and wanted to mention it for future consideration. Mayor Alexander asked if the neighborhood was advised about the uses of this location. Brad Buller, City Planner stated it was disclosed to the KB Homebuyers. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council were: James Martin, 6527 Mimosa, stated he filed the appeal. He added Mr. Granger has done an excellent job and he appreciated his assistance. He stated the Road House is right down the street from this project and felt it would be a convenient location for anyone to pick up a six-pack and get on the freeway. He hoped the Council would put a condition that alcohol not be sold at this site. He also mentioned traffic circulation around this site and explained the challenges associated with it. He stated he was never told about the use for this location when he moved in which was in 1985. Mike Burum stated they are excited about bringing this project to the City. He continued to talk about the project and explained what it has to offer. He stated they also have restrictions for the hours they will be selling alcohol. Ray Paccini, 13255 Catalpa, stated this convenience store is going to make his life easier. He stated it would really help make things much more convenient for him. Jerri Lee, Palo Verde, stated this is the first notice she has received about this. She stated she is against the project, but felt the Council has let her down by taking down the Windrows. She felt there was too much at that location for a two-lane road. John Lyons mentioned the AM/PM at Rochester and Foothill and how crowded it is at various times of the day. He felt the City really needs more gas stations. Jim Frost felt there needed to be a median island at this location or this will not work once the area reaches build out. Ed Villanoman, Palo Verde, stated he lives south of this project. He commented on the traffic study that was done in 2001 and that a current one should be done because of the growth in this area since that time. He stated safety is also a concern. He stated if someone wants to rob this place, they are only 60 seconds from access to a get-away. He felt more trees should be planted. He stated they would like to know what the plans are for this entire area. He felt there would be too many places where people can purchase alcohol in one square mile. He felt traffic should be studied in this area so that there is more safety. Mayor Alexander asked Mr. Villanoman if he was told about this by KB Homes. Mr. Villanoman stated he does not remember being told about the projects for this area or he would never have purchased a home there. Tim Wallace, Myrtle Court, stated he is not opposed to this project going in, but felt it should be safe. He felt there needed to be a median to keep this intersection safe. He did not feel this should be open 24 hours a day and should not be open at midnight. There being no further public input, the public hearing was closed. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he felt there were a lot of places that sell alcohol, but did not feel it was fair to restrict this place from selling alcohol. He stated traffic is a concern to him around this area. He felt there would be a lot of traffic on Day Creek because of the mall being built below this project. He brought up the fast food business at Milliken and Base Line and their hours of operation. He felt the whole landscaping issue needs to be addressed from Etiwanda west. He felt there is a lot of work to be done to beautify this area. He stated he would not support this project without considering the median. He felt the median was definitely warranted. City Council Minutes April 7, 2004 Page 12 Councilmember Howdyshell stated the developer has addressed the lighting issue and the lowering of the pad. He stated his main concern is the median and felt it would make things safer. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated they can definitely ask the developer to put in a median. He said he would never argue against additional safety. He also pointed out the landscape project that is going in on the south side of Highland is not this developer and indicated it is the Mormon Volunteer project. Councilmember Kurth stated he especially liked Jerry Lee's comments about trees. He stated he felt there was too much traffic in the City. He stated he felt the City's standards have been met for this project by the developer. He stated he gives credit to the Planning Commission and that he will support their decision. He stated he did not see why alcohol at this location would really matter since it is being sold across the street. He felt the staff and Planning Commission have done everything possible to make this a good project and that he supports it. Councilmember Williams stated just because there are a number of liquor licenses allowed in an area, the City does not have to approve a certain number. She asked what is being done about the trees. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated there is a very dense planting planned along the freeway. Councilmember Williams stated she would suppod a median. She stated she did not want Rancho Cucamonga residents shopping in Fontana. She felt the City should expand their notification of a public hearing notice even though they are meeting the minimum requirements. She also brought up her concern for the hours of the fast food restaurant. Mayor Alexander stated he is not prepared to support this tonight. He felt there should be a better surveillance system at these types of locations. He felt the City owes it to the residents not to support this. He felt at best this should be delayed to mitigate some of the residents concerns. James Markman, City Attorney, stated the Council can approve this with the condition that a median be added with the approval of the City Engineer. Brad Buller, City Planner, added that more notification was sent out to residents than was required for this meeting. Councilmember Gutierrez agreed we should go beyond what is normaJly required for notification. RESOLUTION NO. 04-124 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, UPHOLDING THE ACTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003-00719 AND THE ISSUANCE OF MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR A GAS STATION WITH PUMP ISLAND CANOPY AND A SINGLE BUILDING CONTAINING A 2.947 SQUARE FOOT CONVENIENCE STORE AND 2,504 SQUARE FOOT FAST FOOD RESTAURANT ON 1.48 ACRES OF LAND IN THE VILLAGE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD AND HIGHLAND AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1089-121-08 AND 1089-401-66. MOTION: Moved by Kurth, seconded by Gutierrez to deny the appeal with the condition that the median be added upon approval of the City Engineer (Resolution No. 04-124 as modified). Councilmember Williams reminded everyone that one of the conditions is that on-site security will be in place from 8:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m., and asked if this meant a professional security guard. City Council Minutes April 7, 2004 Page 13 Brad Buller, City Planner, stated yes it does and that they will have a camera as well. He added at any time the Council or the Police Chief hears of any problems they can modify the conditions at any time. Motion carried 4-1 (Alexander voted no). G2. CONSIDERATION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT DRAFT FUNDINg, ALLOCATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2004-2005- A review of the federally-required Annual Action Plan, which includes the preliminary selection of CDBG projects, based on a new grant allocation of $1,180,000. Staff report presented by Tom Grahn, Associate Planner. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council were: Diane Case, Project Sister, told about her service and asked for the Council to suppod their cause. House of Ruth stated this has been a very tough year for them and that the CDBG funds are very important to keep things going. He continued to talk about their services and thanked the Council for their support. Sandra Weatherford, Campfire USA, had surveys for the Council to review and also talked about their program. Jim Frost wanted to thank the City for all they do to help these organizations. He felt a lot of gratitude should be given to all of these organizations for the work they do. Tony Mize, Hope Through Housing, hopes the Council will help them out. He stated they do work with the House of Ruth and the Campfire USA. He thanked the Council for their past support and hoped they will continue supporting them in the future. Greg Alvarado, Old Timers Foundation, told about their program. He thanked the Council for their consideration. There being no further input, the public hearing was closed. Councilmember Kurth stated he is thrilled about all of these programs. He thanked all of the organizations for the work they do. Councilmember Williams thanked Tom Grahn, Associate Planner, for how he manages this program and how organized it is. Councilmember Howdyshell stated he sat on a committee for nutrition and felt the Meals on Wheels Program was a good investment and should be supported. ACTION: Final Plan to be brought back at a future meeting for approval. [] H. PUBLIC HEARINGS I No Items Submitted. City Council Minutes April 7, 2004 Page 14 I. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS I1. CITY MANAGER - BUDGET UPDATE - (Oral Report) A power point presentation was given by Jack Lam, City Manager. ACTION: Report received and filed. J. COUNCIL BUSINESS J1. LEGISLATIVE UPDATE - (Oral Report) Councilmember Williams stated last week members of Council met with legislators in Sacramento and felt they just don't get it that what they are doing will affect local government. She stated it is so important to get the ballot measure approved so that the State cannot take money from the cities. She asked people to sign the petitions. She stated last Saturday, she was at Barnes and Noble with staff and the firefighters. She stated on Sunday, she and her husband were out collecting signatures. She talked about other initiatives that have qualified to be placed on the ballot. She thanked Congressman Dreier for the funding bill he got approved which will help the City. She mentioned the new Senior Center is under construction and thanked Congressman Dreier, Senator Brulte and Assemblyman Dutton for their support. J2. CONSIDERATION OF LIBRARY SUBCOMMITTEE'S RECOMMENDATION FOR NEW BOAF~I~ MEMBER Councilmember Howdyshell stated Wanda Mitchell resigned from the Library Board and thanked her for her service. He stated the Subcommittee would like to recommend ken Sakala be appointed to fill her position. MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Kurth to approve the appointment of ken Sakala to the Library Board. Motion carried unanimously [] K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR THE NEXT MEETING K1. Councilmember Williams stated she would like for the Massage Technician Ordinance to be looked at and compare ours to other cities as to what they require for licensing and hours of training, etc. She would like this to come back at a future meeting with a report. L. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS No communication was made from the public. City Council Minutes April 7, 2004 Page 15 MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Kurth to adjourn in the memory of City Employee Paul Taylor. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 9:47 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: * CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/26/2004 through 4/12/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00208461 3/31/2004 A AND A AUTOMOTIVE 104.05 AP - 00208462 3/31/2004 A AND K 30 MIN PHOTO LAB INC 10.28 AP- 00208463 3/31/2004 ABC LOCKSMITHS 82.21 AP- 00208463 3/31/2004 ABC LOCKSMITHS 177.79 AP - 00208463 3/31/2004 ABC LOCKSMITHS 18.34 AP - 00208463 3/31/2004 ABC LOCKSMITHS 4.31 AP - 00208463 3/31/2004 ABC LOCKSMITHS 30.00 AP-00208463 3/31/2004 ABC LOCKSMITHS 18.23 AP- 00208464 3/31/201M ABLAC 16.39 AP- 00208465 3/31/2004 ADAMSON, RONALD 1,155.00 AP- 00208467 3/31/2004 AIRGAS WEST 17.22 AP - 00208467 3/31/2004 AIR. GAS WEST 7.20 AP - 00208467 3/31/2004 AIRGAS WEST 17.94 AP- 00208467 3/31/2004 AIRGAS WEST 2.16 AP - 00208469 3/31/2004 AMAZON.COM CREDIT 317.15 AP - 00208472 3/31/2004 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 187.00 AP - 00208473 3/31/2004 APG COMPANY 1,260.00 AP - 00208474 3/31/2004 ARBOR NURSERY INC 488.11 AP - 00208475 3/31/2004 ARCH WIRELESS 1,086.94 AP - 00208477 3/31/2004 AUFBAU CORPORATION 21,590.00 AP - 00208477 3/31/2004 AUFBAU CORPORATION 1,570.00 AP - 00208477 3/31/2004 AUFBAU CORPORATION 547.50 AP - 00208477 3/31/2004 AUFBAU CORPORATION 16,880.00 AP-00208477 3/31/2004 AUFBAUCORPORATION 12,142.50 AP- 00208477 3/31/2004 AUFBAUCORPORATION 2,105.00 AP - 00208477 3/31/2004 AUFBAU CORPORATION 1,570.00 AP - 00208478 3/31/2004 AURORA PICTURES INC. 576.50 AP- 00208480 3/31/2004 AUTORESTORATORS INC 1,571.20 AP - 00208480 3/31/2004 AUTO RESTORATORS INC 21.28 AP- 00208481 3/31/2004 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 148.70 AP- 00208481 3/31/2004 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 171.68 AP - 00208481 3/31/2004 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 90.93 AP - 00208481 3/31/2004 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 88.36 AP- 00208481 3/31/2004 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 231.99 AP - 00208481 3/31/2004 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 75.48 AP- 00208481 3/31/2004 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 10.31 AP- 00208481 3/31/2004 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 55.90 AP - 00208481- 3/31/2004 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 1,025.78 AP- 00208482 3/31/2004 BARNES AND NOBLE 34.44 AP - 00208484 3/31/2004 BEN BOLLINGER PRODUCTIONS LTD. 800.00 AP- 00208485 3/31/2004 BERNELLHYDRAULICS INC 1,207.36 AP - 00208487 3/31/2004 BRANDMAN ASSOCIATES INC, MICHAEL 4,140.32 AP- 00208488 3/31/2004 BRODART BOOKS AP- 00208488 3/31/2004 BRODART BOOKS 1,259.34 393.69 AP- 00208489 3/31/2004 BUCKAROO COMMUNICATIONS INC. 1,100.00 AP - 00208490 3/31/2004 BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC 2,005.00 AP- 00208490 3/31/2004 BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC 13,866.88 AP- 00208490 3/31/2004 BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC 2,601.50 AP- 00208490 3/31/2004 BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC 27,134.00 AP - 00208490 3/31/2004 BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC 195.42 AP- 00208491 3/31/2004 CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC ENTRY 145.00 AP - 00208492 3/31/2004 CALSENSE 1,000.00 AP- 00208492 3/31/2004 CALSENSE 1,000.00 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page:-- 1-' Current Date: 04/13/20C Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC. CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:1 14:13:12 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/26/2004 through 4/12/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00208492 3/31/2004 CALSENSE AP - 00208492 3/31/2004 CALSENSE 2,278.94 225.91 AP - 00208492 3/31/2004 CALSENSE 1,000.00 AP- 00208493 3/31/2004 CARTE GRAPH SYSTEMS 16,593.50 AP - 00208494 3/31/2004 CHAMPION AWARDS AND SPECIALIES 24.24 AP - 00208495 3/31/2004 CITY NATIONAL BANK 88,897.03 AP - 00208496 3/31/2004 CLABBY, SANDRA 1,000.00 AP - 00208497 3/31/2004 CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. 8.08 AP - 00208498 3/31/2004 CLOUT 20.00 AP - 00208499 3/31/2004 COLTON TRUCK SLrPpLy 11.87 AP - 00208499 3/31/2004 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 25.86 AP - 00208499 3/31/2004 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 27.41 AP- 00208501 3/31/2004 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS ] 31.25 AP - 00208501 3/31/2004 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS 1 188.72 AP - 00208502 3/31/2004 COPP CRUSHING CORP, DAN 60.00 AP - 00208502 3/31/2004 COPP CRUSHING CORP, DAN 10.00 AP- 00208503 3/31/2004 CORONACLAY COMPANY 1,010.16 AP- 00208503 3/31/2004 CORONA CLAY COMPANY 1,010.16 AP- 00208504 3/31/2004 COSTA, IVA 12.00 AP - 00208506 3/31/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 170.33 AP - 00208506 3/31/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 356.23 AP - 00208506 3/31/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 328.73 AP - 00208506 3/31/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 99.18 AP - 00208506 3/31/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 51.88 AP - 00208506 3/31/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 591.62 AP - 00208506 3/31/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 653.13 AP - 00208506 3/31/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 200.03 AP - 00208506 3/31/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 54.08 AP - 00208506 3/31/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 311.13 AP - 00208506 3/31/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 23.23 AP - 00208506 3/31/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 121.93 AP - 00208506 3/31/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 348.53 AP - 00208506 3/31/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 57.96 AP - 00208506 3/31/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 81.33 AP - 00208506 3/31/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.60 AP - 00208506 3/31/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 118.86 AP - 00208506 3/31/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 68.38 AP - 00208506 3/31/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.60 AP - 00208506 3/31/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 641.13 AP - 00208506 3/31/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 259.43 AP - 00208506 3/31/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.60 AP - 00208506 3/31/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 191.23 AP - 00208506 3/31/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 868.43 AP - 00208506 3/31/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 55.20 AP - 00208506 3/31/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 149.33 AP- 00208506 3/31/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 215.43 AP - 00208506 3/31/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 68.28 AP - 00208506 3/31/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 308.93 AP - 00208506 3/31/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 134.03 AP - 00208506 3/31/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 968.83 AP - 00208506 3/31/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 166.28 AP - 00208506 3/31/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 58.48 AP - 00208506 3/31/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 44.18 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 2 Current Date: 04/13/20¢ Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC _ CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 14:13:¢ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/26/2004 through 4/12/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00208506 3/31/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 177.45 AP - 00208506 3/31/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.60 AP - 00208506 3/31/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 49.68 AP - 00208506 3/31/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 65.64 AP - 00208506 3/31/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 236.43 AP - 00208506 3/31/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 32.03 AP - 00208506 3/31/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 34.28 AP - 00208506 3/31/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 55.20 AP - 00208506 3/31/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 198.93 AP - 00208506 3/31/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 462.01 AP - 00208506 3/31/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 32.68 AP - 00208506 3/31/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 204.43 AP - 00208507 3/31/2004 D A R E AMERICA MERCHANDISE 74.53 AP - 00208508 3/31/2004 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 325.41 AP - 00208508 3/31/2004 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 242.98 AP - 00208508 3/31/2004 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 267.22 AP - 00208509 3/31/2004 DAGHDEVIRIAN, KATHY 520.80 AP - 00208510 3/31/2004 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 40,358.75 AP - 00208511 3/31/2004 DAPPER TIRE CO 60.35 AP- 00208512 3/31/2004 DAVENPORT, JAY E. 197.50 AP-00208513 3/31/2004 DAVIS, SOLLY 15.00 AP- 00208514 3/31/2004 DE LEISE, JENAE 519.24 AP - 00208516 3/31/2004 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 268.30 AP- 00208516 3/31/2004 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 174.34 AP - 00208517 3/31/2004 ED'S R V REPAIR INC 2,377.37 AP - 00208518 3/31/2004 EN POINTE TECHNOLOGIES 8,645.32 AP - 00208520 3/31/2004 EWlNG IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 127.20 AP - 00208521 3/31/2004 EXCLUSIVE EMAGES 23.70 AP- 00208521 3/31/2004 EXCLUSIVEEMAGES 43.10 AP - 00208522 3/31/2004 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 11.02 AP - 00208522 3/31/2004 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 23.48 AP - 00208523 3/31/2004 FERNANDEZ, INES 89.00 AP- 00208524 3/31/2004 FILARSKY ANDWATT 550.00 AP - 00208525 3/31/2004 FILTER RECYCLING SERVICE INC 455.00 AP - 00208526 3/31/2004 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 368.00 AP - 00208526 3/31/2004 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 868.00 AP- 00208526 3/31/2004 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 868.00 AP - 00208527 3/31/2004 FIRST PLACE TROPHIES 433.69 AP- 00208528 3/31/2004 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 178.30 AP- 00208528 3/31/2004 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 178.20 AP- 00208528 3/31/2004 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 217.18 AP- 00208529 3/31/2004 FLEET GLASS 225.30 AP - 00208530 3/31/2004 FORD OF UPLAND INC 53.06 AP- 00208530 3/31/2004 FORD OF UPLAND INC 69.10 AP- 00208530 3/31/2004 FORD OF UPLAND INC 179.51 AP- 00208532 3/31/2004 GALE GROUP,THE 54.14 AP - 00208532 3/31/2004 GALE GROUP,THE 55.10 AP- 00208532 3/31/2004 GALE GROUP,THE 175.05 AP - 00208532 3/31/2004 GALE GROUP,THE 175.05 AP- 00208533 3/31/2004 GALLS INC 398.62 AP - 00208534 3/31/2004 GAME ROOM GALLERY 1,200.00 AP - 00208537 3/31/2004 GOMEZ, CRYSTAL 56.50 AP - 00208538 3/31/2004 GRAMMER, HARRY 100.00 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 3 Current Date: 04/13/20C Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC. CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 14:13:C CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Re~ister 3/26/2004 through 4/12/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00208539 3/31/2004 GRCC/RAT 60.00 AP - 00208540 3/31/2004 GTSI CORP 9,576.00 AP- 00208541 3/31/2004 GUARDIAN 2,722.75 AP - 00208542 3/31/2004 HIRZ, MICHAEL 95.00 AP - 00208543 3/31/2004 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 32.78 AP - 00208543 3/31/2004 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 33.41 AP - 00208543 3/31/2004 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 64.65 AP - 00208544 3/31/2004 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 219.29 AP - 00208544 3/31/2004 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 507.17 AP - 00208544 3/31/2004 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 240.58 AP - 00208544 3/31/2004 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 17.64 AP - 00208544 3/31/2004 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 96.74 AP - 00208544 3/31/2004 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 8.60 AP - 00208544 3/31/2004 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 62.23 AP - 00208545 3/31/2004 HOOPER, ALISON 2,100.00 AP - 00208546 3/31/2004 HOPE THROUGH HOUSING FOUNDATION 532.00 AP - 00208547 3/31/2004 HOSE MAN INC 130.55 AP - 00208548 3/31/2004 HOYT LUMBER CO., SM 223.74 AP - 00208549 3/31/2004 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 395.55 AP- 00208549 3/31/2004 HYDROSCAPEPRODUCTS INC 113.12 AP - 00208550 3/31/2004 ICI DULUX PAINT CENTERS 706.09 AP - 00208550 3/31/2004 ICI DULUX PAINT CENTERS 170.47 AP - 00208550 3/31/2004 ICI DULUX PAINT CENTERS 143.63 AP - 00208552 3/31/2004 INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY COMPANY 25.77 AP - 00208552 3/31/2004 INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY COMPANY 207.15 AP - 00208552 3/31/2004 INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY COMPANY 55.17 AP - 00208553 3/31/2004 INDUSTRY GRAPHIX 258.60 AP - 00208554 3/31/2004 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY GROUP 29.63 AP - 00208555 3/31/2004 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 229.08 AP - 00208555 3/31/2004 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 204.88 AP - 00208555 3/31/2004 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 219.40 AP- 00208556 3/31/2004 INTERSTATEBATTER1ES 62.84 AP - 00208556 3/31/2004 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 202.22 AP - 00208557 3/31/2004 INTRAVAIA ROCK AND SAND 100.00 AP - 00208557 3/31/2004 INTRAVAIA ROCK AND SAND 34.48 AP - 00208558 3/31/2004 JACOBSEN DIVISION OF TEXTRON INC 225.00 AP - 00208558 3/31/2004 JACOBSEN DIVISION OF TEXTRON INC 206.25 AP - 00208558 3/31/2004 JACOBSEN DIVISION OF TEXTRON INC 343.45 AP - 00208558 3/31/2004 JACOBSEN DIVISION OF TEXTRON INC 13.75 AP - 00208558 3/31/2004 JACOBSEN DIVISION OF TEXTRON INC -242.76 AP - 00208559 3/31/2004 JOBS AVAILABLE 149.04 AP - 00208560 3/31/2004 JONES AND MAYER LAW OFFICES OF 25.00 AP- 00208561 3/31/2004 JUAREZ, KRISTI 49.00 AP - 00208562 3/31/2004 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC 50,1 I2.52 AP - 00208562 3/31/2004 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC 3,780.52 AP- 00208563 3/31/2004 KB HOME 325.01 AP - 00208565 3/31/2004 KCAL 96.7 AP- 00208565 3/31/2004 KCAL 96.7 1,800.00 AP- 00208566 3/31/2004 KIM PETERSON 3,350.00 500.00 AP - 00208567 3/31/2004 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES 1,270.00 AP - 00208568 3/31/2004 KLEPAR, GERTRUDE 830.00 AP - 00208570 3/31/2004 LAIRD CONSTRUCTION CO 3,800.00 AP - 00208571 3/31/2004 LANCE SOLL AND LUNGHARD 1,627.00 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 4 Current Date: 04/13/20G Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC _ CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time ~/ 14:13:C CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA .Agenda Check Register 3/26/20~4 through 4/12/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00208572 3/31/2004 LANDIN, PAULA 200.00 AP - 00208573 3/31/2004 LARRY BROWN CONSTRUCTION 1,000.00 AP - 00208574 3/31/2004 LASER LINE 89.95 AP - 00208575 3/31/2004 LEE, HO 750.00 AP - 00208576 3/31/2004 LEII~I~'ER, LUKAS 339.75 AP - 00208578 3/31/2004 LILBURN CORPORATION 2,186.25 AP - 00208579 3/31/2004 LOTT, CHARLENE 19.00 AP - 00208580 3/31/2004 MAIN STREET SIGNS 892.98 AP - 00208580 3/31/2004 MAIN STREET SIGNS 993.99 AP - 00208581 3/31/2004 MARSHALL, TAMEKA 34.00 AP - 00208582 3/31/2004 MARTIN AND CHAPMAN CO 107.36 AP - 00208583 3/31/2004 MESSENGER INVESTMENT COMPANY 1,000.00 AP - 00208584 3/31/2004 METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT 1,000.00 AP - 00208584 3/31/2004 METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT 1,000.00 AP - 00208585 3/31/2004 MIDWEST TAPE 25.99 AP - 00208585 3/31/2004 MIDWEST TAPE 97.94 AP- 00208585 3/31/2004 MIDWEST TAPE 321.84 AP - 00208587 3/31/2004 MILLIKEN, KEELY AP- 00208588 3/31/2004 MMASC 2,100.00 AP - 00208589 3/31/2004 MURRAY & ASSOCIATES, BOB 50.00 5,509.30 AP - 00208590 3/31/2004 NAPA AUTO PARTS 36.05 AP - 00208590 3/31/2004 NAPA AUTO PARTS 162.65 AP - 00208591 3/31/2004 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS INC 128.45 AP - 00208591 3/31/2004 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS INC 151.55 AP - 00208591 3/31/2004 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS INC 151.55 AP - 00208591 3/31/2004 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS INC 75.78 AP - 00208591 3/31/2004 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS INC 75.78 AP - 00208591 3/31/2004 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS INC 75.78 AP - 00208592 3/31/2004 NATIONAL DEFERRED AP - 00208593 3/31/2004 NATIONS RENT 11,259.25 914.92 AP - 00208594 3/31/2004 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS 46.28 AP - 00208594 3/31/2004 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS 46.28 AP - 00208594 3/31/2004 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS 46.28 AP - 00208594 3/31/2004 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS 46.28 AP - 00208594 3/31/2004 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS 46.28 AP - 00208594 3/31/2004 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS 46.28 AP - 00208595 3/31/2004 NEWPORT TRAFFIC STUDIES AP - 00208596 3/31/2004 NOWOTNEY, JENNIFER 1,080.00 34.00 AP - 00208597 3/31/2004 O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC 82.58 AP - 00208597 3/31/2004 O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC 119.01 AP - 00208597 3/31/2004 O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC 124.94 AP - 00208597 3/31/2004 O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC 84.94 AP - 00208598 3/31/2004 OCLC INC AP- 00208600 3/31/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 53.73 AP-00208600 3/31/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 26.16 AP - 00208600 3/31/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 262.48 AP - 00208600 3/31/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 5.83 AP- 00208600 3/31/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 15.96 1.63 AP - 00208600 3/31/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 11.57 AP- 00208600 3/31/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 18.99 AP - 00208600 3/31/2004 OFFICE DEPOT AP- 00208600 3/31/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 216.84 36.72 AP - 00208600 3/31/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 11.37 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 5 Current Date: 04/13/20¢ Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC _ CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Tim~ 14:13:¢ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/26/2004 through 4/12/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00208600 3/31/2004 OFFICE DEPOT AP - 00208600 3/31/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 203.69 AP - 00208600 3/31/20~- OFFICE DEPOT 137.05 1.92 AP - 00208600 3/31/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 32.62 AP - 00208600 3/31/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 97.91 AP - 00208600 3/31/2004 OFFICE DEPOT -46.64 AP - 00208600 3/31/2004 OFFICE DEPOT AP - 00208600 3/31/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 95.90 AP - 00208600 3/31/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 627.00 AP - 00208600 3/31/2004 OFFICE DEPOT -3.85 AP- 00208600 3/31/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 186.12 AP - 00208600 3/31/2004 OFFICE DEPOT -15.79 AP - 00208600 3/31/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 237.50 AP - 00208600 3/31/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 22.61 AP- 00208600 3/31/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 93.10 AP- 00208600 3/31/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 21.77 AP - 00208600 3/31/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 62.06 AP - 00208600 3/31/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 35.34 AP - 00208600 3/31/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 44.41 AP - 00208600 3/31/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 90.91 AP-00208600 3/31/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 217.21 AP - 00208600 3/31/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 20.34 AP - 00208600 3/31/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 19.31 AP - 00208600 3/31/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 69.58 AP-00208600 3/31/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 158.12 24.37 AP - 00208600 3/31/2004 OFFICE DEPOT -50.38 AP - 00208601 3/31/2004 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 549.00 AP - 00208601 3/31/2004 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 260.00 AP - 00208602 3/31/2004 OTT, LAURA 324.00 AP - 00208602 3/31/2004 OTT, LAURA 126.00 AP - 00208602 3/31/2004 OTT, LAURA 144.00 AP - 00208604 3/31/2004 OWEN ELECTRIC 162.50 AP - 00208605 3/31/2004 PACIFIC EQUIP AND IRRIGATION INC 1,181.13 AP - 00208608 3/31/2004 PENINSULA LIBRARY SYSTEM 300.00 AP - 00208609 3/31/2004 PEP BOYS AP- 00208609 3/31/2004 PEP BOYS 12.41 2.96 AP - 00208611 3/31/2004 PERFORMANCE AUTO BODY 2,285.62 AP- 00208611 3/31/2004 PERFORMANCE AUTO BODY 0.01 AP- 00208611 3/31/2004 PERFORMANCE AUTO BODY 2,901.12 AP- 00208612 3/31/2004 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 516.37 AP- 00208612 3/31/2004 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 85.94 AP - 00208612 3/31/2004 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 36.00 AP - 00208612 3/31/2004 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 944.67 AP- 00208612 3/31/2004 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 1,145.21 AP - 00208612 3/31/2004 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 52.22 AP - 00208612 3/31/2004 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 104.45 AP- 00208612 3/31/2004 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 246.03 AP - 00208612 3/31/2004 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 205.10 AP- 00208612 3/31/2004 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 179.87 AP- 00208612 3/31/2004 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 880.75 AP- 00208612 3/31/2004 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 210.28 AP- 00208612 3/31/2004 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 45.00 AP - 00208615 3/31/2004 PLUMMER THE PLUMBER 1,000.00 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 6 Current Date: 04/13/20E Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC _ CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time~ 14:13:C CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/26/2004 through 4/12/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00208617 3/31/2004 POMONA VALLEY KAWASAKI 104.72 AP - 00208617 3/31/2004 POMONA VALLEY KAWASAKI 119.23 AP- 00208619 3/31/2004 POUK AND STEINLE INC. 335,846.24 AP - 00208619 3/31/2004 POUK AND STEINLE INC. 3,995.90 AP- 00208619 3/31/2004 POUK AND STEINLE INC. 1,528.53 AP - 00208620 3/31/2004 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 6.81 AP - 00208621 3/31/2004 PROTECH TRANSMISSION SERVICES 2,748.00 AP - 00208622 3/31/2004 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 7.00 AP - 00208622 3/31/2004 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 7.00 AP - 00208624 3/31/2004 QWEST 3.49 AP ~ 00208625 3/31/2004 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 72.12 AP - 00208626 3/31/2004 RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY 27.96 AP - 00208627 3/31/2004 RANCHO CUCAMONGA QUAKES PROFESSIONP 10,000.00 AP - 00208628 3/31/2004 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 51.29 AP - 00208628 3/31/2004 RBM LOCK AND KEy SERVICE 2.69 AP - 00208629 3/31/2004 RCPFA 6,245.46 AP - 00208630 3/31/2004 RECREATIONAL EQUIPMENT INC 24.37 AP - 00208631 3/31/2004 REED, JOHN 300.00 AP - 00208632 3/31/2004 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 205.60 AP - 00208632 3/31/2004 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 5,262.31 AP - 00208632 3/31/2004 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 1,923.67 AP - 00208632 3/31/2004 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 15,835.45 AP - 00208632 3/31/2004 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 15,455.09 AP - 00208632 3/31/2004 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 894.94 AP - 00208632 3/31/2004 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 599.32 AP - 00208632 3/31/2004 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 1,661.70 AP - 00208632 3/31/2004 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 6,203.50 AP - 00208632 3/31/2004 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 3,959.78 AP - 00208633 3/31/2004 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT AP- 00208633 3/31/2004 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 43.64 AP - 00208634 3/31/2004 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 132.47 AP - 00208634 3/31/2004 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 110.00 65.00 AP - 00208634 3/31/2004 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 85.00 AP - 00208634 3/31/2004 ROBLES SR, RAUL P AP - 00208635 3/31/2004 ROSS, D SEAN 110.00 AP - 00208636 3/31/2004 ROTH PHI), FREDRICK 225.00 AP - 00208637 3/31/2004 SAFETY FIRST 4,970.00 AP - 00208637 3/31/2004 SAFETY FIRST 6.41 AP - 00208637 3/31/2004 SAFETY FIRST 14.31 AP- 00208637 3/31/2004 SAFETY FIRST 6.41 AP - 00208637 3/31/2004 SAFETY FIRST 6.38 AP - 00208637 3/31/2004 SAFETY FIRST 69.43 AP- 00208637 3/31/2004 SAFETY FIRST 18.46 AP- 00208637 3/31/2004 SAFETY FIRST 17.90 AP- 00208637 3/31/2004 SAFETY FIRST 10.90 AP - 00208637 3/31/2004 SAFETY FIRST 6.41 AP- 00208637 3/31/2004 SAFETY FIRST 6.41 AP - 00208637 3/31/2004 SAFETY FIRST 9.40 AP- 00208637 3/31/2004 SAFETY FIRST 1.49 AP - 00208637 3/31/2004 SAFETY FIRST 60.39 AP - 00208637 3/31/2004 SAFETY FIRST 115.99 29.06 AP - 00208637 3/31/2004 SAFETY FIRST 60.94 AP - 00208637 3/31/2004 SAFETY FIRST 54.43 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 7 Current Date: 04/13/20¢ Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC_ CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:,7 14:13:C CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/26/2004 through 4/12/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00208637 3/31/2004 SAFETY FIRST 53.36 AP - 00208637 3/31/2004 SAFETY FIRST 15.60 AP- 00208639 3/31/2004 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 15,686.17 AP - 00208640 3/31/2004 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 38,652.24 AP - 00208641 3/31/2004 SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM CO [NC 62.50 AP - 00208641 3/31/2004 SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM CO INC 258.60 AP - 00208642 3/31/2004 SCHNEIDER, DANIEL 51.38 AP - 00208643 3/31/2004 SCHNEIDERS, SUZANNE 150.00 AP - 00208644 3/31/2004 SCHNEIDERWENT, KAREN 7.54 AP - 00208645 3/31/2004 SENCHAL, CAL 255.50 AP - 00208645 3/31/2004 SENCHAL, CAL 92.00 AP - 00208645 3/31/2004 SENCHAL, CAL 66.50 AP - 00208646 3/31/2004 SEQUEL CONTRACTORS INC 603,880.00 AP - 00208646 3/31/2004 SEQUEL CONTRACTORS INC -60,388.00 AP - 00208647 3/31/2004 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 275.14 AP - 00208648 3/31/2004 SHOETERIA AP - 00208649 3/31/2004 SIERRA SPRINGS 145.44 97.32 AP - 00208650 3/31/2004 SIGN SHOP, THE 162.43 AP - 00208651 3/31/2004 SIGNATURE AUTO COLLISION CENTER 770.17 AP- 00208651 3/31/2004 SIGNATURE AUTO COLLISION CENTER 19.31 AP - 00208652 3/31/2004 S1LVIA CONSTRUCTION INC 7,418.94 AP - 00208653 3/31/2004 SMART AND FINAL 58.00 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1.29 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 77.42 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.04 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.49 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.88 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.57 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.14 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.18 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 117.53 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.42 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 41.77 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 108.08 AP - 00208662 3131/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.34 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.57 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.04 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.08 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.67 AP- 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAEDISON 13.28 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.04 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.72 AP- 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 147.68 AP- 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAEDISON 12.04 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.08 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAEDISON 12.47 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.57 AP- 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 117.67 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 0.27 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 8 Current Date: 04/13/20C Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC _ CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time~l~ 14:13:12 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Re~,ister 3/26/2004 through 4/12/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTI-IERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.93 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.96 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTI-IERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.76 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.76 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHiERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 102.27 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.57 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.08 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.93 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.04 AP ~ 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 111.57 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.04 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 36.80 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.18 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.68 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 237.75 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 34.57 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTH]ERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 74.22 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.52 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.19 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.69 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 40.61 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 55.01 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 155.39 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.12 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 45.98 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 39.99 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 41.75 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.93 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.93 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 106.67 AP- 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.04 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.44 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 65.24 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 119.03 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 80.67 AP ~ 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 119.83 AP- 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.19 AP- 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.43 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 55.86 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.06 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 63.51 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 9 Current Date: 04/13/20C Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC. CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:q 14:13:C CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/26/2004 through 4/12/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.04 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.42 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.57 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 111.75 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 54.16 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.97 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.19 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.74 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 48.29 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 11.53 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.35 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.93 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP- 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.18 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 100.72 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.93 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.93 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.54 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 71.14 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 76.09 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 82.16 AP ~ 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 722.67 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.08 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 344.11 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.89 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.08 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.11 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.40 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.04 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 4,128.03 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.76 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 51.81 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 50.04 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON t,548.84 AP- 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAEDISON 188.38 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 44.78 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.19 AP- 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.93 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 54.48 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 80.55 AP- 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.19 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 67.39 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 86.74 AP - 00208662 3/3 t/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.04 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.75 AP - 00208662 3131/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.75 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 145.17 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 67.89 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 10 Current Date: 04/13/20¢ Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC _ CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time~ ~ 14:13:C CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/26/2004 through 4/12/2004 Check No: Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 38.92 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.75 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.04 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.04 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 224.39 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 48.16 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.04 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.53 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.76 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.77 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.57 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 32.68 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 99.04 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.97 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 65.08 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.19 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 408.98 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.49 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.99 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.71 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 179.47 AP- 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 109.38 AP- 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.19 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 87.03 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.68 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.08 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.72 AP- 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.19 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 0.19 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP- 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.76 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 28.64 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.76 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.76 AP- 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 120.91 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 121.23 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 140.41 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 56.44 AP- 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 730.56 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 165.07 AP- 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.04 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 99.24 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.72 AP - 00208662 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 11 Current Date: 04/13/20¢ Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC_CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:.~ 14:13:C II CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/26/2004 through 4/12/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00208663 3/31/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 268.40 AP - 00208664 3/31/2004 SOUTHLAND SPORTS OFFICIALS 332.00 AP - 00208665 3/31/2004 SPARKLETTS 87.00 AP - 00208667 3/31/2004 STANDARD PACIFIC OF INLAND EMPIRE 2,194.08 AP - 00208668 3/31/2004 STATEWIDE RENT A FENCE 455.80 AP - 00208669 3/31/2004 STEELWORKERS OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION 329.01 AP - 00208669 3/31/2004 STEELWORKERS OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION 796.38 AP - 00208669 3/31/2004 STEELWORKERS OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION 918.00 AP - 00208669 3/31/2004 STEELWORKERS OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION 591.74 AP - 00208669 3/31/2004 STEELWORKERS OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION 861.51 AP - 00208669 3/31/2004 STEELWORKERS OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION 349.45 AP-00208670 3/31/2004 STERICYCLE INC 198.00 AP - 00208671 3/31/2004 STERLING COI~YEE SERVICE 119.95 AP- 00208671 3/31/2004 STERLINGCOIq~EE SERVICE 213.01 AP - 00208672 3/31/2004 SULLY-MILLER CONTRACTING COMPANY 888,970.26 AP - 00208672 3/31/2004 SULLY-MILLER CONTRACTING COMPANY -88,897.03 AP- 00208673 3/31/2004 SUNRISE FORD 5.83 AP - 00208673 3/31/2004 SUNRISE FORD 4.55 AP - 00208673 3/31/2004 SUNRISE FORD 10.34 AP - 00208673 3/31/2004 SUNRISE FORD 132.49 AP- 00208673 3/31/2004 SUNRISE FORD 78.18 AP - 00208674 3/31/2004 SUNRISE TRADING CO 484.87 AP - 00208676 3/31/2004 TANNER, LAWRERY 500.00 AP - 00208677 3/31/2004 TARGET 7.02 AP - 00208677 3/31/2004 TARGET 42.45 AP- 00208677 3/31/2004 TARGET 53.22 AP - 00208678 3/31/2004 TEMP POWER SYSTEMS 90.00 AP - 00208679 3/31/2004 TEREX UTILITIES WEST 250.39 AP- 00208681 3/31/2004 TOBIN, RENEE 18.04 AP- 00208681 3/31/2004 TOBIN, RENEE 19.31 AP- 00208681 3/31/2004 TOBIN, RENEE 35.49 AP- 00208682 3/31/2004 TRAFFIC SPECIALTIES 156.78 AP - 00208683 3/31/2004 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 28,763.00 AP - 00208683 3/31/2004 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 933.89 AP- 00208683 3/31/2004 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 17,558.00 AP- 00208684 3/31/2004 U S HOME CORPORATION 101.12 AP - 00208685 3/31/2004 UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION 160.00 AP - 00208685 3/31/2004 UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION 2,944.00 AP - 00208686 3/31/2004 UNDERGROUND TECHNOLOGY INC 282.31 AP- 00208688 3/31/2004 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 21.65 AP - 00208688 3/31/2004 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 35.47 AP - 00208688 3/31/2004 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 49.05 AP - 00208688 3/31/2004 UN1FIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 33.53 AP - 00208688 3/31/2004 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 104.97 AP- 00208688 3/31/2004 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 525.33 AP - 00208688 3/31/2004 UNIF1RST UNIFORM SERVICE 49.05 AP- 00208688 3/31/2004 UN1FIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 166.11 AP - 00208688 3/31/2004 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 35.47 AP - 00208688 3/31/2004 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 557.62 AP - 00208689 3/31/2004 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P, 2,622.54 AP - 00208689 3/31/2004 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P, 22,291.58 AP - 00208690 3/31/2004 UNIQUE MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC 573.38 AP - 00208691 3/31/2004 UNITED RENTALS NORTHWEST INC 904.54 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 12 Current Date: 04/13/20C Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:. ~' 14:13:C /2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/26/2004 through 4/12/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00208692 3/31/2004 UNITED WAY 49.00 AP - 00208693 3/31/2004 UPS 30.05 AP - 00208695 3/31/2004 VERIZON 20.41 AP - 00208695 3/31/2004 VERIZON 47.65 AP - 00208695 3/31/2004 VERIZON 20.41 AP - 00208695 3/31/2004 VERIZON 20.41 AP - 00208695 3/31/2004 VERIZON 20.55 AP - 00208695 3/31/2004 VERIZON 21.76 AP- 00208695 3/31/2004 VERIZON 28.87 AP - 00208695 3/31/2004 VERIZON 20.41 AP - 00208695 3/31/2004 VERIZON 20.74 AP - 00208695 3/31/2004 VERIZON 28.87 AP - 00208695 3/31/2004 VERIZON 27.90 AP - 00208695 3/31/2004 VERIZON 20.41 AP - 00208695 3/31/2004 VERIZON 28.94 AP - 00208695 3/31/2004 VERIZON 29.84 AP - 00208696 3/31/2004 VIGILANCE, TERRENCE 357.00 AP - 00208697 3/31/2004 VIRTUAL PROJECT MANAGER INC 500.00 AP - 00208698 3/31/2004 VISTA PAINT 523.64 AP - 00208699 3/31/2004 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 124.94 AP - 00208700 3/31/2004 WASTE MANAGEMENT 215.06 AP - 00208701 3/31/2004 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 28.53 AP - 00208702 3/31/2004 WHITE CAP CONST SUPPLY 101.25 AP - 00208703 3/31/2004 WILLDAN ASSOCIATES 76,905.00 AP - 00208704 3/31/2004 WLP EVERGREEN APARTMENTS LLC 573.00 AP- 00208705 3/31/2004 WOLFF, STEVE 125.00 AP - 00208706 3/31/2004 WOODRUFF SPRADLIN AND SMART 10,769.09 AP - 00208707 3/31/2004 XEROX CORPORATION 150.53 AP - 00208707 3/31/2004 XEROX CORPORATION 150.53 AP - 00208707 3/31/2004 XEROX CORPORATION 1,794.04 AP - 00208707 3/31/2004 XEROX CORPORATION 929.35 AP - 00208707 3/31/2004 XEROX CORPORATION 150.53 AP - 00208707 3/31/2004 XEROX CORPORATION 1,794.04 AP - 00208708 3/31/2004 DRIVER ALLIANT SPECIAL EVENTS 848.75 AP - 00208710 4/1/2004 SMITH, VINCENT 76.00 AP - 00208711 4/7/2004 A AND A AUTOMOTIVE 422.44 AP - 00208712 4/7/2004 ABC LOCKSMITHS 44.55 AP - 00208713 4/7/2004 ABLAC 281.36 AP - 00208714 4/7/2004 ABLETRONICS 78.95 AP - 00208715 4/7/2004 ACCENT COMPUTER SOLUTIONS INC 112.50 AP - 00208718 4/7/2004 ADAMSON, RONALD 1,320.00 AP - 00208718 4/7/2004 ADAMSON, RONALD 1,155.00 AP - 00208719 4/7/2004 ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 606.00 AP - 00208720 4/7/2004 ADT SECURITY SERVICES INC 331.14 AP - 00208722 4/7/2004 ALLEN, SYLVESTER R 159.18 AP - 00208723 4/7/2004 ALOHA BATTERIES 960.00 AP - 00208724 4/7/2004 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 275.00 AP - 00208725 4/7/2004 ALVARADO, YVETTE 90.00 AP - 00208726 4/7/2004 AMAZON.COM CREDIT 375.28 AP - 00208728 4/7/2004 AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 200.00 AP - 00208730 4/7/2004 ARCHIBALD PET HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00208730 4/7/2004 ARCHIBALD PET HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00208731 4/7/2004 ARNOLD FIELDS PAINTING 919.00 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 13 Current Date: 04/13/20C Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Timel, n 14:13:C CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/26/2004 through 4/12/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00208732 4/7/2004 AUDIO EDITIONS 8.58 AP - 00208733 4/7/2004 AUFBAU CORPORATION 827.50 AP - 00208733 4/7/2004 AUFBAU CORPORATION 495.00 AP - 00208733 4/7/2004 AUFBAU CORPORATION 547.50 AP - 00208734 4/7/2004 AUTO RESTORATORS INC 346.85 AP - 00208735 4/7/2004 BAKER, SHARI 600.00 AP - 00208736 4/7/2004 BARNES AND NOBLE 114.78 AP - 00208738 4/7/2004 BEDON CONSTRUCTION INC. 199.26 AP - 00208739 4/7/2004 BISHOP COMPANY 899.49 AP - 00208740 4/7/2004 BOOKS ON TAPE INC 19.40 AP - 00208741 4/7/2004 BRANSKY, JODI 56.50 AP - 00208742 4/7/2004 BRODART BOOKS 156.06 AP - 00208743 4/7/2004 BROWER, DENISE 264.00 AP - 00208744 4/7/2004 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 43.31 AP - 00208744 4/7/2004 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 25.00 AP - 00208744 4/7/2004 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 22.50 AP - 00208745 4/7/2004 CAMACHO, JENNIFER i00.00 AP - 00208746 4/7/2004 CAMASTRA, MARY ANN 132.00 AP - 00208747 4/7/2004 WARREN & CO INC, CARL 683.52 AP ~ 00208748 4/7/2004 CENTRAL CITIES SIGNS INC 87.28 AP - 00208749 4/7/2004 CHAMPION AWARDS AND SPECIALIES 317.86 AP - 00208749 4/7/2004 CHAMPION AWARDS AND SPECIALIES 12.93 AP - 00208750 4/7/2004 CHOICE POINT BUSINESS AND GOVERNMENT: 96.00 AP - 00208751 4/7/2004 CLAREMONT CAMERA AND VIDEO INC 195.44 AP - 00208751 4/7/2004 CLAREMONT CAMERA AND VIDEO INC 15.00 AP - 00208752 4/7/2004 CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. 6.23 AP - 00208752 4/7/2004 CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. 211.75 AP - 00208753 4/7/2004 CLASS SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS 1,600.00 AP - 00208754 4/7/2004 COMP USA INC 55.93 AP - 00208755 4/7/2004 CONCENTRA MEDICAL CENTERS 135.62 AP - 00208755 4/7/2004 CONCENTRA MEDICAL CENTERS 173.83 AP - 00208756 4/7/2004 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS 1 437.75 AP - 00208756 4/7/2004 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS 1 2,000.00 AP - 00208756 4/7/2004 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS 1 844.60 AP - 00208756 4/7/2004 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS 1 79.37 AP - 00208757 4/7/2004 CONSOLTANTS, NIKKEN WEIINESS 100.00 AP - 00208758 4/7/2004 CORONA, PAUL 95.69 AP - 00208759 4/7/2004 COUNTRY ESTATE FENCE CO INC 1,350.11 AP - 00208760 4/7/2004 COURT TRUSTEE 118.50 AP - 00208760 4/7/2004 COURT TRUSTEE 200.00 AP - 00208761 4/7/2004 CRAIG, LAIRD 90.00 AP - 00208762 4/7/2004 CREATIVE WHOLESALE 30.02 AP - 00208762 4/7/2004 CREATIVE WHOLESALE 28.02 AP - 00208762 4/7/2004 CREATIVE WHOLESALE 28.02 AP - 00208764 4/7/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 116.53 AP - 00208764 4/7/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 6.94 AP - 00208764 4/7/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 9.15 AP - 00208764 4/7/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 122.03 AP - 00208764 4/7/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 172.63 AP - 00208764 4/7/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 211.83 AP - 00208764 4/7/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 104.43 AP - 00208764 4/7/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 155.93 AP - 00208764 4/7/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 38.68 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 14 Current Date: 04/13/20C Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC- CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:, ,t 14:13:¢ / CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/26/2004 through 4/12/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00208764 4/7/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 184.98 AP - 00208764 4/7/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 177.28 AP - 00208764 4/7/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 102.48 AP - 00208764 4/7/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 87.08 AP - 00208764 4/7/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 46.38 AP - 00208764 4/7/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 461.83 AP - 00208764 4/7/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 117.88 AP - 00208764 4/7/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 419.03 AP - 00208764 4/7/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 85.98 AP - 00208764 4/7/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 175.93 AP - 00208764 4/7/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 74.73 AP - 00208764 4/7/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 156.03 AP - 00208764 4/7/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 114.33 AP - 00208764 4/7/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 114.33 AP - 00208764 4/7/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 63.98 AP - 00208764 4/7/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 32.03 AP - 00208764 4/7/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 167.38 AP - 00208764 4/7/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 97.83 AP - 00208764 4/7/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 135.48 AP - 00208764 4/7/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 78.03 AP - 00208764 4/7/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 130.83 AP - 00208764 4/7/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 67.18 AP - 00208764 4/7/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 641.43 AP - 00208764 4/7/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 152.73 AP - 00208764 4/7/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 140.63 AP - 00208764 4/7/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 173.73 AP - 00208764 4/7/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 152.83 AP - 00208764 4/7/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 198.93 AP - 00208764 4/7/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 186.83 AP - 00208764 4/7/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 237.78 AP - 00208764 4/7/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 105.43 AP - 00208764 4/7/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 61.78 AP - 00208764 4/7/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 91.23 AP - 00208764 4/7/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 35.33 AP - 00208764 4/7/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 86.83 AP - 00208764 4/7/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 80.23 AP - 00208764 4/7/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 259.43 AP - 00208765 4/7/2004 D A R E AMERICA MERCHANDISE 210.49 AP - 00208766 4/7/2004 DAPPER TIRE CO 361.87 AP - 00208767 4/7/2004 DEALERS AUTO TRIM 95.00 AP - 00208768 4/7/2004 DELTA DENTAL 31,890.72 AP - 00208769 4/7/2004 DIETZEL, JANE 60.00 AP - 00208770 4/7/2004 EAST, CHAD 159.72 AP - 00208771 4/7/2004 EBSCO 7,306.80 AP - 00208772 4/7/2004 EIGHTH AVENUE GRAPHICS 84.04 AP - 00208773 4/7/2004 EMCOR SERVICE 15,100.00 AP - 00208774 4/7/2004 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS 557.90 AP - 00208775 4/7/2004 EN POINTE TECHNOLOGIES 7,687.15 AP - 00208776 4/7/2004 ESGIL CORPORATION 61,244.10 AP - 00208777 4/7/2004 ESPINO, YVETTE 55.00 AP - 00208778 4/7/2004 EVANS SPORTING GOODS 4.07 AP - 00208779 4/7/2004 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 172.96 AP - 00208779 4/7/2004 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 912.49 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 15 Current Date: 04/13/20C Report:CK_AGENDA PEG PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:, .,~ 14:13:G CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/26/2004 through 4/12/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00208780 4/7/2004 EWING, THOMAS E 65.00 AP - 00208781 4/7/2004 EXCLUSIVE EMAGES 34.48 AP - 00208782 4/7/2004 FASTALRE CORP 90.07 AP - 00208784 4/7/2004 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 27.33 AP - 00208784 4/7/2004 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 20.42 AP - 00208784 4/7/2004 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 17.08 AP - 00208785 4/7/2004 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 815.63 AP - 00208785 4/7/2004 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 868.00 AP - 00208785 4/7/2004 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 486.00 AP - 00208785 4/7/2004 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 815.63 AP - 00208785 4/7/2004 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 435.38 AP - 00208785 4/7/2004 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 720.00 AP - 00208786 4/7/2004 FIRST PLACE TROPHIES 211.19 AP - 00208788 4/7/2004 FUKUSHIMA, JUDITH 2,595.00 AP - 00208790 4/7/2004 GALE GROUP,THE 40.59 AP - 00208790 4/7/2004 GALE GROUP,THE 175.05 AP - 00208791 4/7/2004 GARCIA, VIVIAN 34.I3 AP - 00208792 4/7/2004 GARON-T TOWING 65.00 AP - 00208793 4/7/2004 GEOGRAPHICS 176.71 AP - 00208799 4/7/2004 GLOBAL PRESENTER 11,000.00 AP - 00208800 4/7/2004 GO FAMILY 75.00 AP - 00208801 4/7/2004 GONZALEZ, CARLOS 230.00 AP - 00208802 4/7/2004 GRAINGER, WW 354.71 AP - 00208802 4/7/2004 GRAINGER, wwq 386.15 AP - 00208804 4/7/2004 GRUENEICH RESOURCE ADVOCATES 7,159.15 AP - 00208805 4/7/2004 HAKIMI, SUSAN 227.40 AP - 00208806 4/7/2004 HARALAMBOS BEVERAGE COMPANY 354.62 AP - 00208807 4/7/2004 HARDY, BRADLEY 260.50 AP - 00208808 4/7/2004 HI STANDARD AUTOMOTIVE 115.23 AP - 00208809 4/7/2004 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 47.78 AP - 00208809 4/7/2004 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 7.15 AP - 00208810 4/7/2004 HOPKINS, PETE 90.00 AP - 00208812 4/7/2004 HURST, CHERYL ' 288.50 AP - 00208813 4/7/2004 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 446.09 AP - 00208813 4/7/2004 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 0.85 AP - 00208814 4/7/2004 IEMA 25.00 AP - 00208817 4/7/2004 1RILIAN, MOE 115.00 AP - 00208819 4/7/2004 JOHNSON, VIVIAN 10.54 AP - 00208820 4/7/2004 JRC HOUSING 6,745.00 AP - 00208821 4/7/2004 KELLY BLUE BOOK 56.00 AP - 00208822 4/7/2004 KELLY PAPER COMPANY 32.35 AP - 00208822 4/7~2004 KELLY PAPER COMPANY 21.25 AP - 00208822 4/7/2004 KELLY PAPER COMPANY -1.15 AP - 00208823 4/7/2004 KLAUS AND SONS 2,025.00 AP 00208825 4/7/2004 LA VOZ 576.00 AP 00208827 4/7/2004 LEFE, ROY A 65.00 AP 00208828 4/7/2004 LEIFFER, LUKAS 310.50 AP 00208829 4/7/2004 LEWIS OPERATING CORP 20.50 AP 00208830 4/7/2004 LILBURN CORPORATION 333.99 AP 00208832 4/7/201M LOPEZ, ROBERT 60.00 AP - 00208833 4/7/2004 LOWER, DARLENE 251.00 AP - 00208834 4/7/2004 M & K INVESTMENTS 53.00 AP - 00208835 4/7/2004 MANJARREZ, GISELLE 19.00 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 16 Current Date: 04/13/20¢ Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:,t 14:13:C /b CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/26/2004 through 4/12/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00208836 4/7/2004 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 5,517.82 AP - 00208836 4/7/2004 MARIFOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 446.97 AP - 00208837 4/7/2004 MARTENS, DARLENE 27.12 AP - 00208838 4/7/2004 MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE 59.44 AP - 00208839 4/7/2004 MIDWEST TAPE 11.99 AP - 00208839 4/7/2004 MIDWEST TAPE 41.98 AP - 00208839 4/7/2004 MIDWEST TAPE 133.93 AP - 00208839 4/7/2004 MIDWEST TAPE 18.99 AP - 00208840 4/7/2004 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 60.00 AP - 00208840 4/7/2004 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 130.00 AP - 00208840 4/7/2004 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 1,050.00 AP - 00208840 4/7/2004 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 320.00 AP - 00208842 4/7/2004 MOBILE STORAGE GROUP INC 145.34 AP - 00208843 4/7/2004 MORALES, MICHAEL 33.45 AP - 00208844 4/7/2004 MOUNTAIN VIEW EM PHYS MEDICAL GROUP I 185.00 AP - 00208845 4/7/2004 MOUNTAIN VIEW GLASS AND MIRROR 275.16 AP - 00208846 4/7/2004 N M A DUES C/O NAOMI ROBERTS 8.31 AP - 00208847 4/7/2004 NATIONAL DEFERRED 25,438.08 AP - 00208848 4/7/2004 NIKPOUR, MOHAMMED 265.00 AP - 00208849 4/7/2004 OAK TREE LANDSCAPING 3,010.00 AP - 00208850 4/7/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 70.14 AP - 00208850 4/7/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 6.83 AP - 00208850 4/7/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 138.09 AP - 00208850 4/7/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 155.54 AP - 00208850 4/7/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 160.68 AP - 00208850 4/7/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 464.63 AP - 00208850 4/7/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 204.71 AP - 00208850 4/7/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 146.80 AP - 00208850 4/7/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 52.54 AP - 00208850 4/7/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 14.48 AP - 00208850 4/7/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 20.70 AP - 00208850 4/7/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 30.97 AP - 00208850 4/7/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 34.48 AP 00208850 4/7/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 341.50 AP 00208850 4/7/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 30.56 AP 00208850 4/7/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 97.24 AP 00208850 4/7/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 35.55 AP 00208850 4/7/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 143.10 AP 00208850 4/7/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 622.34 AP 00208850 4/7/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 21.19 AP 00208850 4/7/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 69.30 AP 00208850 4/7/2004 OFFICE DEPOT -23.88 AP 00208851 4/7/2004 ORTEGA, PHILLIP 75.00 AP - 00208852 4/7/2004 PACHECO, MARCO 140.00 AP - 00208853 4/7/2004 PACIFIC PLUMBING SPECIALTIES 227.35 AP - 00208854 4/7/2004 PAPER DIRECT INC 101.89 AP - 00208855 4/7/2004 PATTON SALES CORP 594.78 AP - 00208855 4/7/2004 PATTON SALES CORP 45.51 AP - 00208855 4/7/2004 PATTON SALES CORP 190.70 AP - 00208856 4/7/2004 PENA-DUGGAN, YOLANDA 75.00 AP - 00208857 4/7/2004 PEREZ, HECTOR 105.00 AP - 00208858 4/7/2004 PERRY, MARK A 115.00 AP - 00208859 4/7/2004 PETERMAN LUMBER INC 13.27 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 17 Current Date: 04/13/20C Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:_ ~n, 14:13:C / 7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/26/2004 through 4/12/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00208859 4/7/2004 PETERMAN LUMBER INC 60.44 AP - 00208860 4/7/2004 PHOENIX GROUP INFORMATION SYSTEMS 531.64 AP - 00208861 4/7/2004 PIZZOLA, PETE 115.00 AP - 00208862 4/7/2004 POMONA PRINT STOP 842.39 AP - 00208863 4/7/2004 POURItASSANIAN, ABBY 30.00 AP - 00208864 4/7/2004 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 170.25 AP - 00208865 4/7/2004 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 7.00 AP - 00208865 4/7/2004 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 7.00 AP - 00208867 4/7/2004 QUINTANA, ZITA 193.00 AP - 00208869 4/7/2004 RADFORD, DANIEL 115.00 AP - 00208869 4/7/2004 RADFORD, DANIEL 25.00 AP - 00208870 4/7/2004 RADULESCU, ELIADE 50.00 AP - 00208871 4/7/2004 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITIZEN PATROL 416 190.00 AP - 00208872 4/7/2004 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FAMILY YMCA 1,250.00 AP - 00208872 4/7/2004 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FAMILY YMCA 500.00 AP - 00208873 4/7/2004 RANCHO CUCAMONGA QUAKES PROFESSION,~ 452.55 AP - 00208874 4/7/2004 RANCHO CUCAMONGA ROTARY CLUB 15.00 AP - 00208875 4/7/2004 REDINGER, TOM 70.00 AP - 00208876 4/7/2004 REINHARDTSEN, DEBRA 282.50 AP - 00208877 4/7/2004 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 65.58 AP - 00208877 4/7/2004 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 596.00 AP - 00208878 4/7/2004 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 5.00 AP - 00208878 4/7/2004 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 5.00 AP - 00208879 4/7/2004 RIVERSIDE CO DEPT CHILD SUPPORT 226.00 AP - 00208880 4/7/2004 ROBERT HALF TECHNOLOGY 1,056.00 AP - 00208880 4/7/2004 ROBERT HALF TECHNOLOGY 1,056.00 AP - 00208881 4/7/2004 ROBERTS, KATIE 25.00 AP - 00208883 4/7/2004 ROLATAPE CORPORATION 39.64 AP - 00208884 4/7/2004 S AND S WORLDWIDE 6.98 AP - 00208884 4/7/2004 S AND S WORLDWIDE 1,248.34 AP - 00208885 4/7/2004 S AND W PLASTICS 153.52 AP - 00208887 4/7/2004 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT 142.00 AP - 00208888 4/7/2004 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY AUDITOR CONTR( 376.50 AP - 00208888 4/7/2004 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY AUDITOR CONTR( 376.50 AP - 00208888 4/7/2004 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY AUDITOR CONTR( 502.00 AP - 00208889 4/7/2004 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY DEPT PUBLIC WO! 258.98 AP - 00208890 4/7/2004 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 300.00 AP - 00208892 4/7/2004 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS 128.46 AP - 00208893 4/7/2004 SAN BERNARDINO CTY CHILD SUPPORT PAYM 233.50 AP - 00208894 4/7/2004 SAN BERNARDINO CTY CHILD SUPPORT PAY~ 213.00 AP - 00208895 4/7/2004 SBC 9,443.78 AP - 00208896 4/7/2004 SCMAF INLAND VALLEYS 1,320.00 AP - 00208897 4/7/2004 SEVENTEEN 20.00 AP - 00208898 4/7/2004 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 115.00 AP - 00208899 4/7/2004 SHESHUNOFF INFORMATION SERVICES 394.95 AP - 00208901 4/7/2004 SIMS, DIANA LAURIE 250.00 AP - 00208903 4/7/2004 SONSATIONAL ACTIVITIES 100.00 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,367.89 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.86 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 106.94 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTI-IERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 202.39 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 18 Current Date: 04/13/20C Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:. ~ 14:13:C / CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/26/2004 through 4/12/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTI-~RN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 0.40 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 92.65 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.57 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 63.46 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,217.74 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.29 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 107.39 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 113.24 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.04 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 74.32 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 32.43 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.61 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,868.92 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 50.45 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 75.27 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.08 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 54.21 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.75 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 47.27 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTI-IFRN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.83 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.04 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 389.24 AP - 00208907 4[7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 33.30 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 110.85 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 152.26 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.83 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 165.06 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 142.02 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.87 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 52.99 AP 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDIS ON 16.52 AP 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 4,609.26 AP 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.69 AP 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.33 AP 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.78 AP 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.78 AP 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.69 AP 00208907 4~7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED1SON 13.33 AP 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 29.73 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.57 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.29 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 97.29 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 19 Current Date: 04/13/20C Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: .,, 14:13:C / CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/26/2004 through 4/12/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 165.26 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 118.28 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 275.88 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 56.06 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 29.38 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 129.64 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.00 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 40.63 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.41 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 4,624.24 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 177.11 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13,087.81 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 97.98 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.33 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 78.24 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 48.64 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.04 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.04 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.33 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.33 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.83 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.57 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.04 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.08 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 138.21 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.t4 AP 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.29 AP 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.50 AP 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 72.11 AP 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 83.91 AP 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 130.41 AP 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 30.71 AP 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.33 AP 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 85.93 AP 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 86.72 AP 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 47.08 AP 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.43 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 71.17 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 48.40 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.99 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 92.87 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.76 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 90.64 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 108.16 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.72 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.58 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19,097.13 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.08 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 20 Current Date: 04/13/21912 Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 14:13:C CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/26/2004 tluough 4/12/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP - 00208907 4~7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP - 00208907 4/7/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,106.16 AP - 00208908 4/7/2004 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY 269.86 AP - 00208909 4/7/2004 STOFA, JOSEPH 15.00 AP - 00208910 4/7/2004 STONE ROOFING 375.00 AP - 00208911 4/7/2004 STONE, VIVIAN 132.00 AP - 00208912 4/7/2004 STOVER SEED COMPANY 299.01 AP - 00208913 4/7/2004 TANGRAM INTERIORS 474.56 AP - 00208914 4/7/2004 THEATRICAL LIGHTING & SCENIC SERVICE 355.58 AP - 00208915 4/7/2004 THOMAS, KIMBERLY 17.96 AP - 00208916 4/7/2004 TOBIN, RENEE 11.74 AP - 00208917 4/7/2004 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 2,780.00 AP - 00208918 4/7/2004 TURCH AND ASSOCIATES, DAVID 4,000.00 AP - 00208919 4/7/2004 TUTORWHIZ INC 929.60 AP - 00208920 4/7/2004 UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION 3,795.00 AP - 00208920 4/7/2004 UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION 60.00 AP - 00208921 4/7/2004 UNDERGROUND TECHNOLOGY INC 464.77 AP - 00208924 4/7/2004 UNIQUE CREATIONS 86.15 AP - 00208925 4/7/2004 UNITED TRAFFIC 987.98 AP - 00208925 4/7/2004 UNITED TRAFFIC 474.21 AP - 00208926 4/7/2004 UNITED WAY 586.32 AP - 00208927 4/7/2004 UPS 59.99 AP - 00208928 4/7/2004 VALLEY CREST TREE COMPANY 668.05 AP - 00208929 4/7/2004 VAN TILBURG, JACK F 66.00 AP - 00208930 4/7/2004 VEND U COMPANY 120.81 AP - 00208932 4/7/2004 VERIZON 570.62 AP - 00208932 4/7/2004 VERIZON 29.38 AP - 00208932 4/7/2004 VERIZON 1,196.09 AP - 00208932 4/7/2004 VERIZON 90.81 AP - 00208932 4/7/2004 VERIZON 91.56 AP - 00208932 4/7/2004 VERIZON 20.41 AP - 00208932 4/7/2004 VERIZON 20.41 AP - 00208932 4/7/2004 VERIZON 20.41 AP - 00208932 4/7/2004 VERIZON 31.75 AP - 00208932 4/7/2004 VERIZON 27.90 AP - 00208932 4/7/2004 VERIZON 28.34 AP - 00208932 4/7/2004 VERIZON 27.13 AP - 00208932 4/7/2004 VERIZON 28.34 AP - 00208932 4/7/2004 VERIZON 400.93 AP - 00208932 4/7/2004 VERIZON 20.75 AP - 00208932 4/7/2004 VERIZON 20.41 AP - 00208932 4/7/2004 VERIZON 27.90 AP - 00208932 4/7/2004 VERIZON 204.02 AP - 00208932 4/7/2004 VERIZON 28.72 AP - 00208932 4/7/2004 VERIZON 28.87 AP - 00208932 4/7/2004 VERIZON 91.18 AP - 00208932 4/7/2004 VERIZON 29.34 AP - 00208932 4/7/2004 VERIZON 528.92 AP - 00208932 4/7/2004 VERIZON 20.66 AP - 00208932 4/7/2004 VERIZON 28.87 AP - 00208932 4/7/2004 VERIZON 91.56 AP - 00208932 4/7/2004 VERIZON 91.18 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 21 Current Date: 04/13/20¢ Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:_, 14:13:£ 2./ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/26/2004 through 4/12/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00208932 4/7/2004 VERIZON 91.18 AP - 00208932 4/7/2004 VERIZON 29.45 AP - 00208932 4/7/2004 VERIZON 20.41 AP - 00208932 4/7/2004 VERIZON 56.11 AP - 00208932 4/7/2004 VERIZON 59.45 AP - 00208932 4/7/2004 VERIZON 32.25 AP - 00208932 4/7/2004 VERIZON 131.32 AP - 00208933 4/7/2004 VIDEO GUYS, THE 779.30 AP - 00208934 4/7/2004 VIGILANCE, TERRENCE 357.00 AP - 00208935 4/7/2004 VILLALUZ, TED 25.00 AP - 00208936 4/7/2004 VIRTUAL PROJECT MANAGER INC 500.00 AP - 00208937 4/7/2004 VISION SERVICE PLAN CA 7,017.48 AP - 00208938 4/7/2004 VOLM, LIZA 112.50 AP - 00208939 4/7/2004 WALKER, KENNETH A 40.00 AP - 00208940 4/7/2004 WALL STREET JOURNAL 213.35 AP - 00208941 4/7/2004 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 641.12 AP - 00208942 4/7/2004 WARD, DES1REE 525.00 AP - 00208943 4/7/2004 WEST COAST NETTING 3,100.00 AP - 00208944 4/7/2004 WEST END MATERIAL SUPPLY 401.52 AP - 00208945 4/7/2004 WEST PAYMENT CENTER 921.79 AP ~ 00208946 4/7/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 72.38 AP - 00208946 4/7/2004 WEST VALLEY/VIRF LLC 255.09 AP - 00208946 4/7/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 203.28 AP - 00208947 4/7/2004 WESTERN HIGHWAY PRODUCTS INC 867.26 AP - 00208947 4/7/2004 WESTERN HIGHWAY PRODUCTS INC -108.98 AP - 00208948 4/7/2004 WlESER EDUCATIONAL 1,205.35 AP - 00208949 4/7/2004 XEROX CORPORATION 176.33 AP - 00208950 4/7/2004 YEE, LARRY 58.00 AP - 00208950 4/7/2004 YEE, LARRY 90.00 AP - 00208951 4/7/2004 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES INC 4,489.43 AP - 00208952 4/7/2004 ZWISSLER, JAMES i I0.00 AP - 00208953 4/8/2004 GREEN, DONNA 100.00 Total for Check ID AP: 2,826,285.86 Total for Entity: 2,826,285.86 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 22 Current Date: 04/13/20C Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 14:13:C City of Rancho Cucamonga City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary March 31, 2004 Pat Market Book % of Days to YTM YTM Investments Value Value Value Portfolio Term Maturity 360 Equiv. 365 Equiv. Local Agency Investment Funds 37,583,155.84 37,583,15584 37,583,155.84 22.77 1 1 1.420 1.440 Certificates of Deposit/Nag - Bank 1,515,000.00 1,523,367.65 1,515,000.00 0.92 733 515 2.150 2.180 Commercial Paper- Discount 5,000,000.00 4,991,641.67 4,991,641.67 3.02 59 39 1.022 1.036 Fc-~dera~ Agency Issues - Coupon 121,000,000.00 121,532,048 80 120,933,068.75 73.28 1,542 1,285 3,229 3.274 Investments 165,098,155.84 165,630,213.96 165,022,866.26 100.00% 1,139 948 2.741 2.77,9 Cash and Accrued Interest Passpook/Checking 117,307.08 117,307.08 117,307.08 I I 0.493 0.500 (not included in yield calculations) Accrued Interest at Purchase 5,484.44 5,484.44 Subtotal 122,791.52 122,791 Total Cash and Investments 165,215,462.92 165,753,005.48 165,145,657.78 1,139 948 2.741 2.779 Total Earnings March 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date Current Year 399,390.68 3,376,605.34 Average Daily Balance 163,890,669.75 159,861,671.48 Effective Rate of Return 2.87% 2.80% I certify that this report accurately reflects all City pooled investments and is in comformity with the investment policy adopted Mamh 5, 2003. A copy of the investment policy is available in the Administrative Services Department. The Investment Program herein shown provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet the next six months estimated expenditures. The month-end market values were obtained from (IDC)-Interactive Data Corporation pricing service. The attached Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents as of the prior month's end is provided under the City official Investment Policy. The provisions of the individual bond documents govem the management of these funds. Portfolio CITY CP R~un Date: 04,'13z2004 - 15:53 PM (PRF_PM1) SymRept *v6.21 Re~o~ Var. 5.00 City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Page 2 Portfolio Details - Investments March 31, 2004 Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to Maturity CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rata ~,i...~,y~S 360 Maturity Local Agency In~,e=[i~.[ Funds SYS00005 00005 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND 37,583,155.84 37,583,155.84 37,583,155.84 1.440 1.420 1 Subtotal and Average 36,450,897.78 37,583,155.84 37,583,155.84 37,583,155.84 1.420 1 CerUf;,.~=, of Deposit/Neg. - Bank 06050E6Q3 1228 BANK OF AMERICA 08/27/2003 1,515,000.00 1,523,367.65 1,515,000.00 2.150 2.150 515 08/29/2005 Subtotal and Average 1,515,000.00 1,515,000.00 1,523,367.65 1,515,000.00 2,150 515 Commercial Paper - Discount 45974MEA2 1251 INTERNATIONAL LEASE FINANCE CO 03/12/2004 5,000,000.00 4,991,641.67 4,991,641.67 1.020 1,022 39 03/10/2004 Subtotal and Average 3,542,623.57 5,0O0,O00.00 4,991,641.67 4,991,641.67 1.022 39 Federal Agency Issues - Coupon 31331LM88 1127 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 05/07/2002 2,000,000.00 2,008,125.00 2,000,O00.00 5.200 5.129 1,131 03/07/2007 31331QK55 1199 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 05/19/2003 2,500,000.00 2,507,031.25 2,496,875~00 3.120 3.104 1,509 05/19/2008 31331QM79 1205 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 06/03/2003 2,000,000.00 2,007,500.00 2,000,000.00 3.210 3.166 1,524 06/03/2008 31331QN78 1207 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 06/09/2003 5,500,000.00 5,500,000.00 5,500,000.00 2.440 2407 1,072 03/09/2007 3133107C5 1226 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 08/13/2003 3,000,000.00 3,019,687.50 2,995,312.50 3.050 3.049 1,229 08/13/2007 31331TFG1 1231 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 09/24/2003 2,000,000.00 2,021,250.00 1,996,562.50 3.370 3,370 1,271 09/24/2007 31331TGY1 1234 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 10/15/2003 3,000,000.00 3,002,812.50 3,000,000.00 3.625 3.575 1,293 10/16/2007 31331TGV7 1236 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 10/27/2003 3,000,0~0.00 3,027,187.50 3,000,000.00 3,010 2.969 1,121 04/27/2007 31331THR5 1241 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 11/10/2003 2,000,000.00 2,021,875.00 2,000,000.00 3.170 3.127 1,134 05/10/2007 31331TND9 1244 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 12/17/2003 2,000,000.00 2,030,625.00 2.000,B00.00 3.970 3.916 1,538 06/17/200~ 31331'rWH0 1253 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 03/17/2004 2,000,000.00 1,995,000.00 2,000,000.00 3.240 3.196 1,446 03/17/2008 31331T~VJ6 1254 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 03/17/2004 4,000,000.00 3,991,250.00 3,997,500.00 3.550 3.517 1,691 11/17/2008 3133Mg4J8 01050 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/17/1999 3,000,000.00 3,032,812.50 2,984,531.25 6.230 6,265 77 06/I 7/2(X~ 31339XJJ4 1210 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/12/2003 5,000,000.00 5,000,0~0.00 5,000,000.00 2,650 2.614 1,166 06/11/'2007 31339XB78 1211 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06'16/2003 3,000,0C0,00 3,00~,437.50 3,000,000.00 2.430 2.397 1,079 03/16/2007 31339X].B8 1212 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/19/2003 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2.625 2.589 1,174 06/19/2007 31339XPL2 1213 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/26/2003 2,000,000.00 1,993,750,00 2,000,000.00 2.450 2,417 1,273 09/~7 31339YHG0 1218 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 07/16/2003 3,000,000.00 3,007,500.00 3,000,000.00 2.540 2.506 1,110 04/16~2007 3133X1 P27 1237 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 10/27/2003 3,000,000.00 3,048,750.00 3,000,000.00 4.000 3.945 1,670 10/27/2~08 3133X3DX8 1247 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 01/29/2004 2,(X~O,000.00 2,014,375.00 2,000,000.GO 3.355 3.310 1,306 10/29/2007 3133X3E25 1248 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 01/29/'2004 2,000,000.00 2,025,625.00 2,0GO,GO0.00 3.320 3.275 1,306 10/29/2007 3133X4MR9 1255 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 03/2W2004 5,000,000.00 5,004,687.50 5,000,000.00 2.750 2.713 999 12/26/2006 3133X4XF3 1256 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 03V29/2004 2,000,000.00 2,003,125.00 2,0~0,000.00 3.500 3.4.53 1.366 12/28~007 3128X1BD8 1198 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MoF~rG. CORP. 05/19/2003 5,000,000.00 5,016,795.35 4,~33,750.00 3.500 3.479 1,509 05/19/2008 Portfolio CITY Dete: 04/I 3~2004 - 15:53 CP PM (PRF_PM2) SymRep~ V6.21 City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Page 3 Portfolio Details - Investments March 31, 2004 Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to Maturity CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Mood,s 360 Maturity Federal Agency Issues - Coupon 3128X1FG7 1203 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 05/28/2003 3,000,000.00 3,005,379.18 3,000,000.00 2.500 2.466 971 11/28/2006 3128XIDK0 1204 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 05/'28/2003 4,000.000.00 4,013,079.83 4,000,000.00 3.100 3.058 1,336 11/28/2007 3128XIJD0 1208 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 06/12/2003 5,000,000.00 5,015,04.5.17 4,998,500.00 3.030 2.995 1,532 06/11/2008 3128XIJN8 1209 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP, 06J12/2003 2,000,000.00 2,001,279.91 2,000,~00.00 2.400 2.367 1,166 06/11/2007 3128XIL95 1233 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 10/0~/2003 4,000,000.00 4,026,931.76 3,997,600.00 2.800 2.782 899 09/17/'2006 3128X12K2 1239 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 11/03~2003 4,000,000.00 4,064,732.06 3,983,125.00 4.010 4.048 1,665 10/22/200~ 3128X2P25 1257 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 03/30/2004 3,000,000.00 3,019,586.79 3,000,000.00 4.000 3.945 1,824 03/30/2009 3136FOLU4 1101 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 05/24/2001 2,000,000.00 2,013,125.00 2,000,000.00 5.710 5.632 783 05/24/2006 3136F3VQ6 1202 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 05/27/2003 7,000,000.00 7,008,750.00 6,996,.500.00 2.500 2.479 1,149 05/25/2007 3136F3Q82 1219 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 07/16/2003 4,000,000.00 4,006,250.00 4,000,000.00 2.5CO 2.466 1,201 07/16/2007 3136F32F2 1222 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 07/29/2003 4,000,000.00 4,027,600.00 3,993,750.00 3.300 3.289 1,580 07/29/2008 3136F4B45 1243 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 12/12/2003 2,C~0,0~0.00 2,005,625.00 2,000,000.00 3.300 3.255 985 12/12/2006 3136F5EE7 1250 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 03/05/2004 3,000,000.00 3,014,062.50 2,999,062,50 3.750 3.707 1,712 12/08/2008 3136FSGP0 1252 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 03/16/2004 4,000,000.00 4,022,500.00 4,000,000.00 4.040 3.986 1,810 03/15/2009 Subtotal and Average 121,374,141.33 121,000,0~0.00 121,532,048.80 120,933,068.75 3.229 1,285 Total and Average 163,890,669.75 165,098,155.84 165,630,213.96 165,022,866.26 2.741 948 Portfolio CITY City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Page 4 Portfolio Details - Cash March 31, 2004 Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date ParValue ;,;&,k=iValue BookValue Rate Moody's 360 Maturity Savings/Miscellaneous Accounts SYS00180 00180 BANK OF AMERICA 117,307.08 117,307.0~ 117,307.08 0.500 0.493 1 Average Balance 0.00 AccqJed Interest at Purchase 5,484.44 5,484.44 I Subtotal 122,791.52 122,791.52 Total Cash and In w=,~,~,;,~,= 163,890,669.75 165,215,462.92 165,753,005.48 165,145,657.78 2.741 948 Portfolio CITY City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Activity By Type Page 5 March 1, 2004 through March 31, 2004 Beginning Stated Transaction Purchases Redemptions Ending CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Rate Date or ~,~p~;~=, or Withdrawals Balance Local Agency Investment Funds (Monthly Summary) SYS00005 0~005 LOCAL AGENCY iNVST FUND 1.440 11,300,000.00 7,500,000.00 Subtotal 33,783,155.84 11,300,000.00 7,500,000.00 37,583,155.84 Savings/Miscellaneous Accounts (Monthly Summary) SYS00180 00180 BANK OF AMERICA 0.50~ 0.00 920,390.00 Subtotal 1,037,697.08 .0.00 ~,3~.00 117,307.08 Certificates of Deposit/Neg, - Bank Subtotal 1,515,000.00 1,515,000.00 Fe~eia; Agency Issues - Coupon Subtotal 119,922,361.25 22,99;.r~ ~,n 21,~;?$5 O0 120,9~'~.n~ 75 Porfforio CiTY CP ~ Date; PM (PRF_PM3) Sy~Rept V6.23 04/13/2004 15:53 Report Vet. 5.00 City of Rancho Cucamonga Summary of Cash and investments with Fiscal Agents For the Month Ended February 29, 2004 Trustee and/or Purchase Maturity Cost Bond Issue Payinq Aqent Account Name Investment Date Date Yield Value Assessment District No 93-1 US Bank rmprvmnt Fund Fimt Amedcan Treasury Obligation 8/4/1997 N/A* 0.46% $ 257,311.78 Masi Plaza Imprvmnt Fund Cash N/A N/A N/A Reserve Fund First Amedcan Treasury Obligation 8/4/1997 N/A* 0.46% 243,059.18 Reserve Fund N/A N/A N/A Redemp. Fund First Amedcan Treasury Obligation 8/4/1997 N/A 0.46% 80,218.32 Redemp. Fund Cash N/A N/A N/A $ 580,589.28 PFA RFDG Rev Bonds series US Bank Expense Fund First Amedcan Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A* 0.00% $ Cash N/A N/A N/A 1999 A (St) & 1999 B (Subord) Sub Resrv. Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A* 0.46% 581,819.34 Cash N/A N/A N/A Sr. Resrv. Fund First American Treasury Obtigation 7/1/1999 N/A* 0.46% 1,093,018.14 Cash N/A N/A N/A Redemption Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A* 0.00% Cash N/A N/A N/A Revenue Fund First American Treasury Obligation 3/2_/2000 N/A* 0.00% 0.83 Cash N/A N/A N/A Residual Fund First American Treasury Obtigation 1/16/2001 N/A* 0.46% 60,416.69 Cash N/A N/A N/A $ 1,735,255.00 TOTAL CASH AND INVESTMENTS WITH FISCAL AGENTS $ 2,315,844.28 · Note: These investments are money market accounts which have no stated matudty date as they may be liquidated upon demand. [~ A N C H O C U C A M O N G A CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Staff Report DATE: April 21, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP FROM: Debbie Adams, City Clerk BY: Diane Young, Records Coordinator Dawn Haddon, Purchasing Manager SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO AWARD A CONTRACT TO DELTA MICROIMAGING, INC. OF FRESNO, CA, FOR BACKFII E CONVERSION SERVICES IN AN ANNUAL AMOUNt NOT TO EXCEED $40,000 FOR THE PERIOD OF APRIL 21, 2004 THROUGH APRIL 20, 2005, WITH AN OPTION TO RENEW FOR ADDITIONAL ONE YEAR PERIODS, UPON REVIEW AND CONFIRMATION OF PRIC1NG AND MUFUAL CONSENT, UP TO A TOTAL OF THRFF, YEARS, TO BE FUNDED FROM 1016-301-5300. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve and award backfile conversion services to Delta Microlmaging, Inc. of Fresno, CA, in an annual amount not to exceed $40,000, for the period of April 21, 2004, through April 20, 2005, with an option to renew for additional one year periods, upon review and confirmation of pricing and mutual consent, up to a total of three years, to be funded from 1016-301-5300. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The City Clerks Office and Purchasing worked together to develop a scope of work of key backfile conversion services. From this scope of work a Request for Proposal was advertised on August 11, 2003, posted on the City website, and mailed to 26 vendors. Nine (9) responses were received. Of the nine (9) vendors that responded tO the Request for Proposal, Delta Microlmaging, Inc. was selected as the most responsive and responsible vendor. Bid America, who appeared to have been the lowest in price was determined to be unacceptable based on further sample testing submitted during the selection phase. Staff is recommending award of the proposal to the most responsive, responsible proposal from Delta Microlmaging, Inc.. Please see attached supporting documents: (1) Backfile Abstract of Bids (2) Backfile Conversion Pricing Sample and Final Rating (3) Final Committee Evaluation of Backfile Conversion Bid (4) Final Analysis of Bid Americas sample documents (5) Professional Services Agreements. Respectfully submitted, Debbie Adams City Clerk DA:DY:klh Backfile Abstract Page 1 (unit pdc~ng was used in a mock senado of normal day-to-day, see at~ached) Delta Microimaing Integrated Scanning of America Unit Pdca (th Unit Price (to include all include all Task prep work) Other Cost (specif~) Lead Times prep work) Other Cost Lead Times Image Converelon: 16mm rolled film 30 days per batch (10 rolls of based on t80 rolls) 0.07 film) .04 per frame 40,000 frames a day 35mm rolled film 30 days per batch (10 rolls of based on 165 rolls) 0.21 film/ .06 per frame 10,000 frames a day Large Format Scanning: 18"x26" and up (based Building & Planning- 30 days 1.00 per on 26,500 +1-) 0.g Engineering - 2 weeks drawing 300 drawings a day comes with the drawings so it 8 112" pages (based on will be the same - 30 days per t0~000 +/-) 0.065 batch .10 per page thousands a da)/ Indexing: 6 or more flies will be a $17 )er hour charge instead, then be charged the fiat .005 per Each line .005 per field scanning rate keystroke I* negotiable, very flexible CD-ROM Disks: $15 per labele( Master Copy included CE 100 per day $10 per labele( Additional Copies included CE 100 per day $5.50 per cubi( Document Destruction no charge fee Other: Optional Labor $20 per houl Laser Fiche Formattin Travel Costs $75 per trip $30 per td~ flexible Shipping & Mailing standard UP~ Cost no charge rate-~ flexible il- scanning includes: prep, scenning, oneindex, page checking, twoCD i 1- (*) for example, a lO characte~'s field (line) dual entered !copies (entry plus verification) will.cost $.10 repeat lookup and i2- rolled film conversion prices included: conversion services, one index, i autoincrement fields are not charged. i3- the turnaround times may changed for the projects dealing with the i rolled film as DMI has not yet worked on. ~), Prel Ked Hinojos, Purchasing Division, October 30, 2003 Backfile Abstract Page 2 (una pnong was u~u ,, .~ ,,,u~. ~nado of normal ds.v-to-day, see attached) R. C. Center, Inc. Document Imaging Services Corp. Unit Price (to Unit Price (to include all include all Task prep work} Other Cost Lead Times prep work} Other Cost Lead Times Image Conversion: 16mm rolled film (b~__~ed on 180 rolls) 0.035 10 roils = one week 0.045 option 2:.045 10 rolls/week 35mm rolled film 3ased on 165 rolls) 0.18 10 rolls = one week 0.065 option 2:.065 Large Format Scanning: 18"x26" and up (based on 26,500 +1-) 0.7.~ 500/one week 0.98 1,000 docs/week B tl2" pages (based on 10,000 +/-) 0.0.~ ~00/one week 0.1~ Indexing: Each line .08 per inde3 included 0.0.~ as above CD-ROM Disks: Master Copy 10.00 ncluded 0.0C Additional Copies 7.00 ncluded 15.0( Document De~struction .30 lb ~nc[uded 3.5( Other: none 3ptional Labor __ Laser Fiche Formatting 0.02 'ravel Costs none at cost to be determined Shipping & Mailing at cosl to be determined Cost none !:;......~*:..~*~;.~.: i Vendor Comments: ~venaor ~umm~[l~' 1- has 2 options, prices only change for the rolled film. It's unclear what ! the difference is Prepared by Ked Hinojos, Purchasing Division, October 30, 2O03 Backfile Abstract Page 3 ~.u~,,L p.~,,~ ,~o= ~,~ed in a mock senario of normal day-to-day, see attached) ATI, Inc. The California Document Company, LLC Unit Price (to Unit Price (to include all include all Task prep work) Other Cost Lead Times prep work) Other Cost Lead Times Image Convemion: 16mm rolled film (based on 180 rolls) 0.0." n/a n/a 0.0475 15-20 day 35mm rolled film (based on 165 rolls) 0.0.~ n/a n/a 0.075 15-20 da}' Large Format Scanning: '18"x26" and up (based :)n 26,500 +1-) 0.75 / ima~le n/a n/a 0.85 15-20 da}' tl2" pages (based on 10,000 +/-) 0.06 / ima~le n/a n/a 0.0~ 15-20 da}' Indexing: 3.015 / indexing Each line field n/a n/a 0.0.~ 15-20 da}' CD-ROM Disks: Master Copy 7.00 / copy n/a n/a 25.0C 15-20 da}' Additional Cop~es 3.00 / copy n/a n/a 20.0( 1 5-20 day Document Destruction 0.005 / pape~ n/a e/a 4.00/cu. Ft 15-20 da)' Other: Optional Labor Laser Fiche Formatting ~ctual - see Travel Costs below * n/a n/a inc. CD media * pick up & pack - $35/trip Shipping & Mailing ~ctual - see 10.00/next day return & pack - $35/trip ~ost below * n/a n/a ~ervice .................................................................................................................................................. ! Vendor Comments: iVendor Comments: il- *Travel and shipping / Mailing costs: are based upon actual costs. iDocuments will be picked up fi.om your location by company track to ~ensure their safety. Actual conversion of the documents will be executed i n our Milpitas, California headquarters. 2- the cost of each trip will be limited to $650. Prepared by Keri Hinojos, Purchasing Division, October 30, 2003 Backfile Abstract Page 4 Effective Information Resource Corp. Bid America / Convert-A-Doc Unit Price (to Jnlt Price (to include all include all Task prep work) Other Cost Lead Times prep work) Other Cost Lead Times Image Conversion: 16mm rolled film based on 180 rolls) 0.06.~ 10 rolls per week .045/image 7 days 35mm rolled film based on 165 rolls) 0.3.~ 10 rolls per week .075/image 7 da~s Large Format Scanning: 18"x26" and up (based on 26,500 +/-) 0.6 2000 per week .§7/image 14 days 8 1/2" pages (based on 10,000 +1-) 0.07 one week .0525/image 7 days Indexing: Each line 0.02 as above * .007/imag( 14 days CD-ROM Disks: Master Cop}' included no charge n/a Additional Copies 15.0C 8.50/CD 3 days ~)ocument Destruction 2.00 per bo) 26.00/2001bs 7 days )ther: Optional Labor Laser Fiche Formatting Travel ~,~E~ 50.00 per tdp ~5.00 / tdp 3 da~s 5.00 plus Shipping & Mailing 3ostage or Cost =ourier cost not anticipated n/a ! Vendor Comments: iVendor Comments: il- * standard lead time, where we have listed "as above" for indexing, imeans that if we are converting film or documents at a one batch per iweek rate, we will provided the index to the images on the same schedule. iThe index and images will be on the same CD-ROM, and identified ishowing the CD contents. by Ked Hinojos, Purchasing Division, October 30, 2003 Prepared Backfile Abstract (unit pdcin~ I was used in a mock senado of normal day-to-day, see attached) Page 5 Information Manufacturing Corp. Unit Price (to include all Task prep work) Other Cost Lead Times Image Convemlon: 16mm rolled film based on 180 rolls) .1384 / imag( 30 workin~ days 35mm rolled film based on 165 rolls) .1384 / image 30 working days Scanning: 16"x26" and up (based on 26,500 +/-) 5.74 / image 60 workin~ days E~ 1/2" pages (based on 10,000 +1-) .1196 / image 60 working days Indexing: Each line .055 / indel included above CD-ROM Disks: Master Copy 1.6.~ included above Additional Copies 1.6." included above Document Destruction Other: Optional Labor Laser Fiche Formatting12,530.00j kick rravel Costs ~off meeting Shipping & Mailing ~$14.10 per 2 lb Cost ~express saver Prepared by Ked Hinojos, Purchasing Division, October 30, 2003 Backfile Conversion Pricing Sample and Final Rating Based on the following assumptions: Prices compared are for one (1) CD containing 18,000 images constituting 7,500 building permits each requiring 4 lines of indexing. Sub-total shows cost without travel costs, shipping or handling; Total includes costs for one trip and/or shipping/handling. Prices are shown in dollars. 4 lines of Final Ranking Vendor 18,000 indexing Master Formatting Sub- Trip Charge/ Total Based on images esi images = CD Total Ship/Handling Comprehensive aprx. 7.5M indexes) (~FOU p Scores Bid America 810.00 126.00 936.00 85.00 1021.00 1 Delta 1260.00 112.50 1372.50 75.00 1447.50 2 Mirolmaging Unknown 2460.00 DiSC 810.00 1500.00 150.0 2460.00 At cost from San Diego) + unknown travel, 3 ship/handlin~l R.S. Center 630.00 2400.00 10.00 3040.00 3040.00 4 ATI 540.00 450.00 7.00 990,00 650,00 (max) 1647.00 5 2400.00 I.S.A. 720.00 15.00 3135.00 30.00 3165,00 6 ***see note below Cai Docs 855.00 900.00 25.00 1790.00 35.00 (+35.00) 1815.00 (+35.00) 7 Effective Info Rsrc 1170.00 1500.00 2670.00 50.00 2720.00 8 Grp Info Mfg Co 2530.00 (initial tdp) plus 2919.45 * company 2491.20 412.50 1.65 2919.45 14.10 per 2 lb pkg + unknown costs for 9 is out of thereafter ship/handling state, travel 2530.00 (initial tdp) plus 4142.85 cost iS 2491.20 1650.00 1.65 4142.85 14.10 per 2 lb pkg + unknown costs for 9 ~ prohibitive, thereafter ship/handling .... Assumed averages of a 5-digit address, 10-character street name, 10-character description and 7-digit permit number. Then the figure was doubled to accommodate ISA's "dual entry" process, then multiplied by the .005 per keystroke proposed price. ~ Prepared by: Diane Young, City Clerks Office and Keri Hinojos, Purchasing Division Page 1 ~.~ 4/14/2004I:~PURCHASE~RFP-RFB-RFQ's & info\City Clerks Backfile RFPXBackfile Pricing Comparisons & Final Rankings.doc FINAL COMMI3-rEE EVALUATION OF BACKFILE CONVERSION BID Delta Comments: ISA Comments: Criteria Possible Score Microima~lin~l S19+K18+D18= * Keri: although not the lowest, total S10+K9+D0 * Keri: very high overall, very unclear on Price Proposal 20 x 3 = 60 55 pricing based on Diane's scenario is = 19 key stroking. reasonable. Understanding of project objectives; S20+K20+D20= * Shelly: very specific & helpful. S19+K19+D10 * Shelly: no specifics on versions of project approach 60 * Keri: very cleady, formatted = 48 Laserfiche correctly, processes were defined, * Keri: provided very detailed info, but 20 x 3 = 60 appears to be tight and concise, may be possible overkill for what our needs are. Compatibility, facility storage, S20+K20+D20= * Shelly: using version of Laserfiche S20+K20+D20 * Shelly: on line status & record publishing technical resources and process 60 that we are using, which is critical. = 60 * Keri: online retrieval per web-based · Keri: security cameras & pickup access appears to be a plus. management 20 x 3 = 60 se~ice a plus, processes are clear, appears to leave little room for error, equipment is new and up to date. Experience and expertise with public S15+K15+D15= * Shelly: worked with us before & S15+K15+D15 * Keri: 35 yrs total employee experience. 45 had no problems at all. = 45 agencies and similar types of efforts 15 x 3 = 45 * Keri: 38 yrs total employee experience References S10+Kg+D10 * Keri: all cities but listed Diane & S10+KIO+D10 * Keri: all city agencies with like projects. = 29 Shelly Hays as 3rd, should have = 30 10 x 3 = 30 used other non-related ref., did state more available upon request. Standard lead times S5+K4+D5 S5+K5+D5 * Keri: very quick =/day production 5x3=15 =14 =15 Quality and completeness of S5+K5+D5 * Keri: format was followed S5+K4+D2 * Keri: format not followed which made it submitted proposal 5 x 3 = 15 = 15 = 11 hard to follow and find pertinent info. Other: Subcontractors NO All work done in house NO ~.11 work done in house 285 278 228 Total Evaluation Ranking Total Prepared by Keri Hinojos, Purchasing Division, November 20, 2003 I:XPURCHASE~,FP-RFB-Ri~Q's & info\City Clerks Backfile RFP~Evaluation Ranking.doc Page 1 of 5 FINAL COMMITTEE EVALUATION OF BACKFILE CONVERSION BID Possible R.S. Center Comments: Doc. Imaging Comments: Criteria . Score Svcs S19+K19+D18 S17+K10+D5 * Shelly: Laserflche formatting cost? Price Proposal 20 x 3 = 60 = 56 = 37 * Keri: high travel costs & indexing costs, shipping/handling unknown costs. Understanding of project objectives; sla+K20+D15 S20+K20+D20 project approach 20 x 3 = 60 -- 54 = 60 Compatibility, facility storage, sla+K15+D15 * Keri: not labeled with original S17+K19+D20 * Shelly: uses subcontractors for some = 48 questions, processes seemed vague, = 56 work. technical resources and process 20 x 3 = 60 not detailed & open to error. * Keri: 2 other software's used, well- management defined project plan, shipped materials, ogged tracking, newer equip. Experience and expertise with public S13+K13+D8 * Shelly: using subcontractors for large S15+K15+D15 * Keri: 32 yrs total employee expenence, = 34 docs. = 45 multiple gov't agencies at high volume. agencies and similar types of effods 15 x 3 = 45 * Keri: 14 yrs total employee experience. Sa+K10+D2 * Shelly: not detailed project S10+K10+D10 * Keri: all cities with like projects, References 10 x 3 = 30 = 20 description. = 30 awarded contact from City of Diamond · Keri: All cities, all related projects. Bar. Standard lead times SE+KE+D5 * Keri:/week production is e plus S4+KE+D5 * Keri:/week production a plus 5x3=15 =15 =14 Quality and completeness of S4+K4+D4 * Keri: again, slightly out of format (i.e.- D4+KE+D2 * Keri: exact format was used, easy to submitted proposal 5 x 3 = 15 = 12 questionnaire not labeled). = 11 read and follow. Other: Subcontractors Yes Yes * Diane: uses subcontractors 285 242 253 Total Evaluation Ranking Total Prepared by Keri Hinojos, Purchasing Division, November 20, 2003 I:~PURCHASE~FP-RFB-RFQ's & info\City Clerks Backfile RFP~Evaluation Ranking.doc Page 2 of 5 FINAL COMMITTEE EVALUATION OF BACKFILE CONVERSION BID Possible ATI, Inc. Comments: The California Comments: Criteria Score Doc. Co. S19+K19+D10 * Keri:travel cost are unsure S18+K19+D10 Price Proposal 20 x 3 = 60 = 48 = 47 Understanding of project objectives; si 9+K19+D10 * Keri: may not realize the small nature S18+K20+D20 * Keri: based on questionnaire answers project approach 20 x 3 = 60 = 48 of our needs = 58 will need. Compatibility, facility storage, S20+K20+D15 * Keri: very detailed processes and S10+K19+D15 * Shelly: no mention of using Lasen~cshe = 55 well managed, but may be a bit overkill = 44 system, which would mean an extra step technical resources and process for our needs, or process for us to use the files with our management 2o x 3 = 60 system. · Keri: Laserriche not initially used, but overall process & plan appear to be good. Experience and expertise with public S20+K15+D15 S10+K15+D5 * Keri: 47 years total employee agencies and similar types of efforts 15 x 3 = 45 = 50 = 30 experience. · Diane: not cities, only 1 gov't agency. References S10+K4+D8 * Keri: 1 city, 2 state, appeared to be S5+K3+D5 * Shelly: not enough info on project = 22 larger projects then our needs. = 13 descriptions. 10 x 3 = 30 * Ked: no city agencies, didn't reference microfilm in client projects. · Diane: not cities, only 1 9ov't agency. Standard lead times SO+KO+DO * Shelly: none listed S5+K4+D5 * Ked: l/mo. Production time. 5 x 3 = 15 = 0 * Keri: Provided no ETA's & could have = 14 advised with an estimate. Quality and completeness of S5+K4+D4 * Keri: overkill and format not followed, S4+K5+D2 * Keri: followed format and used form, submitted proposal 5 x 3 = 15 = 15 very cumbersome to get through. = 11 easy to follow. Other: Subcontractors NO Storage facility offsite NO 285 236 217 Total Evaluation Ranking Total Prepared by Keri Hinojos, Purchasing Division, November 20, 2003 I:XPURCHASE~FP-RFB-RFQ's & info\City Clerks Backfile RFP~Evaluation Ramking.doc Page 3 of 5 FINAL COMMITTEE EVALUATION OF BACKFILE CONVERSION BID Effective Info. Comments: Bid America / Comments: Possible Resource Convert-A-Doc Criteria ' Score Corp. S19+K18+D5 * Keri: overall high on images & S18+K20+D18 Price Proposal 20 x 3 = 60 = 42 indexing trip costs good. = 56 Understanding of project objectives; S10+K20+D20 * Shelly: storage & retrieval not S20+K20+D20 project approach 20 x 3 = 60 = 30 acceptable. = 60 · Keri: clear what needs to be done. Compatibility, facility storage, S10+K18+D15 * Shelly: did not understand or use S20+K19+D20 = 43 Laserfiche system criteria for = 59 technical resources and process compatibility, would cause extra management 20 x 3 = 60 process for us. · Keri: Laserfiche not used initially, storage system could lack organization, room for error lacks Q.C.. Experience and expertise with public S10+K15+D15 * Shelly: did not state specific S15+K15+D15 = 40 experience with named systems, not = 45 agencies and similar types of efforts 15 x 3 = 45 sure. · Keri: 16 yrs total employee experience. References S10+KIO+D10 * Keri: All cities with like projects. S10+K10+DIO 10x3=30 =30 =30 Standard lead times S3+KS+D5 * Keri: per week production. SS+K5+D5 5x3=15 =13 =15 Quality and completeness of S4+K5+D5 * Keri: exact format used. SS+KS+D5 submitted proposal 5 x 3 = 15 = 14 = 15 Other: Subcontractors NO NO 285 212 280 Total Evaluation Ranking Total Prepared by Keri Hinojos, Purchasing Division, November 20, 2003 I:~PURCHASELRFP-RFB-RFQ's & info\City Clerks Backfile RFP~Evaluation Ranking.doc Page 4 of 5 FINAL COMMITTEE EVALUATION OF BACKFILE CONVERSION BID Info. Comments: Additional Overall Comments: Criteria Possible Score Manufacturing Corp. Ranking in order: NO RATING, OUTOF STATE 1. Bid America = 280 Price Proposal 20x3=6o 2. Delta Microimaging =278 3. Document Imaging = 253 Understanding of project objectives; 4. R.S. Center = 242 project approach 2o x 3 = 60 5. ATI = 236 6. ISA = 228 Compatibility, facility storage, 7. Cai Doc = 217 technical resources and process 20 x 3 = 6o 8. Effective Imaging = 212 management 9. Info. Manufacturing = 0 (out of state) Experience and expertise with public agencies and similar types of effods 15x3=45 References 10x3=30 Standard lead times 5x3=15 Quality and completeness of submitted proposal 5 x 3 -- ~5 Other: 285 0 Total Evaluation Ranking Total Prepared by Keri Hinojos, Purchasing Division, November 20, 2003 I:~PURCHASE~FP-RFB-RFQ's & info\City Clerks Backfile RFP~Evaluation Ral~ing.doc Page 5 of $ NOTES: While a cursory review of BidAmerica's sample work looks good overall, a closer look reveals some problems with quality of the images. Some building permit and Engineering drawing documents were printed to demonstrate the difference between BidAmerica's images and Delta's images. The notes below outline specific results of'the image and indexing quality control checks of BidAmerica's samplings. ENGINEERING DRAWINGS: Drawing 25 - Missed scanning backside of sepia drawing that shows drawing number Drawing 124 - Good. Drawing 156 -bottom left comer folded over in scanning, cutting offthe end of"1424-2". Drawing number wrong; picked up "File No. 1424" instead &drawing number. Drawing 1049 - can't read text and numbers in Engineer's stamp on right side. Drawing number in bottom right comer is not fully legible. (not a problem on Delta's image) Drawing 1084 - Light blue pencil marks not picked up (can't see them on the one Delta scanned either.) Text blurry; can't make out some numbers/letters that are very crisp on original (clear and legible on Delta's image). Drawing 1498 - some text not legible in dark areas; some other numbers and text are a little blurry and hard to read. (better on Delta image) FIRE PLANS: (Note: can't compare these images vs. what Delta did because these weren't sent to Delta; they are being done in-house.) 8880 Foothill - Starbucks - Text in comer box very blotchy and hard to read. Small text in other boxes on plans not legible. Missed PMT in front of permit number. 11201 - 11241 Jersey - Images a little "dirty" (should have used despeckle or background suppression to dean up) 12499 Foothill - Claim Jumper - Fine 9155 Archibald #302 - "Earthquake Brace Components" not legible; picked up wrong permit number (picked up plan check number instead); rubber stamp on back side too light (can't read text under "Fire Sprinkler T.I." and "00-0581". 11530 69 #100 - Pretty good; numbers a little blurred; some areas not legible, but difficult to read even on original; missed PMT in front of permit number. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CONTRACT SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR RECORDS BACKFILE CONVERSION AND SCANNING SERVICES This Agreement is mede and entered into this 21st day of Apd12004, by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter referred to as "CITY") and Delta Microlmaging (hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR"), collectively referred to as the "Parties." RECITALS A. CITY requires the services of a contractor for converting paper and microfilmed records to digital format per specification of RFP # 03 / 04 -201, Backflle Conversion Services. B. CONTRACTOR represents that it is fully qualified to perform such services by virtue of its experience and the training, education and expertise of its pdncipels and employees. C. CITY desires to retain CONTRACTOR to perform the conversion and scanning services specified in this Agreement, and CONTRACTOR desires to perform such services in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises, covenants, and conditions herein contained, CITY and CONTRACTOR agree as follows: 1. Contractor's Services. A. Scope of Services. CONTRACTOR shall provide records conversion and scanning services, as more particularly described in the Scope of Services attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and hereby incorporated by reference. CONTRACTOR is responsible for obtaining and supplying all materials, supplies, and equipment necessary to provide the service. CONTRACTOR agrees to retrieve records on an as-needed basis from City Hall or other location designated by CITY. CONTRACTOR shall maintain all records received from CITY in good condition, and shall retum such items to CITY upon completion of conversion, unless CITY authorizes, in writing, that CONTRACTOR may destroy such items. B. Chan,qes to Scope of Services. CITY shall have the dght to request, in wdfing, changes in the scope of work or the services to be performed. Any changes mutually agreed upon by the Parties, and any increase or decrease in compensation, shall be in writing and shall automatically be incorporated into this Agreement without further action by the Parties. Notwithstanding the foregoing, CITY may reduce the services required to be performed by CONTRACTOR, and CITY'S obligation to pay shall be reduced proportionately. Page 1 3/31/2004 C:~Documents and Settings\Tyler Burton. DMl~Desktop~Dowloads~DeltaPSA.DOC q2 C. Time for Performance. CONTRACTOR shall perform all services in accordance with the Schedules set forth in Exhibit "A". D. Standard of Performance. CONTRACTOR shall perform all work set forth in Exhibit "A" under "Scope of Work" of proposal. "Contractor shall perform all required services in a professional, competent manner, end in acoordance with all applicable industry standards, comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, ordinances, codes and regulations. E. Personnel. CONTRACTOR represents that it has, or wilt secure at its own expense, all personnel required to perform the services under this Agreement. All of the services required under this Agreement shall be performed by CONTRACTOR or under its supervision, and all personnel engaged in the work shall be qualified to perform such services. 1. Permits and Licenses. CONTRACTOR shall obtain and maintain during the Agreement term all necessary licenses, permits and certificates required by law for the provision of services under this Agreement. 2. City's Duties. CITY agrees to provide the CONTRACTOR with an inventory of each batch of records to be converted and/or scanned. CITY will also provide said responsibilities provisioned in Exhibit "A". CITY shall provide such further assistance as is reasonably necessary for CONTRACTOR to perform its obligations hereunder." 3. Term of Agreement. The term of this Agreement shall commence on Apdl 21, 2004, and shall continue until April 20, 2005. Upon notice given to CONTRACTOR by CITY no less than thirty (30) days prior to expiration hereof, this Agreement shall continue in effect, on the same terms and conditions, for additional one year period, upon review and confirmation of pdcing and mutual consent, up to a total of three years, unless sooner terminated as provided herein. 4. Compensation. CITY agrees to pay CONTRACTOR in an amount not to exceed pdces quoted by CONTRACTOR in CONTRACTOR'S response to the Request for Proposal dated August 26, 2003, attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and incorporated by reference herein with a total annual amount not to exceed $40,000. 5. Method of Payment. CONTRACTOR shall provide CITY with a written invoice within thirty (30) calendar days after the completion of production of each batch of records. W~hin ten (10) business days of receipt of each invoice, CITY shall notify CONTRACTOR in writing of any disputed amounts included on the invoice. CITY agrees to pay CONTRACTOR all undisputed amounts included on the invoice within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of the invoice. CITY may withhold payment if CONTRACTOR does not return all records received from CITY not authorized by CITY to be destroyed. At any time dudng regular working hours, all records, invoices, and other materials maintained by CONTRACTOR related to services provided pursuant to this Agreement shall be available for review and audit by CITY. 6. Ownership of Work Product. All documents, images, reproductions, media of any nature, and written material ("Work Product") produced by CONTRACTOR in the performance Page 2 3/31/2004 C:~Documents and Settings\Tyler Burton. DMl~Desktop~owloads~DeltaPSA.DOC of this Agreement, including any and all intellectual property dghts allegedly arising therefrom, are, and shall forever be, the property of CiTY without restriction or limitation upon its use or dissemination by CITY. CONTRACTOR hereby irrevocably assigns to CITY any and all intellectual property fights that it might acquire by operation of law, or otherwise, in connection with the perk)rmance of this Agreement. 7. Status as Independent Contractor. CONTRACTOR is, and shall at all times remain as to CITY, a wholly independent contractor. CONTRACTOR shall have no power to incur any debt, obligation, or liability on behalf of CITY. Neither CITY nor any of its agents shall have control over the conduct of CONTRACTOR or any of CONTRACTOR'S employees, except as set forth in this Agreement. CONTRACTOR shall not, at any time, or in any manner, represent that it or any of its officers, agents or employees are in any manner employees of CITY. 8. Confidentiality. All data, documents, discussion, or other information developed or received by CONTRACTOR or provided for performance of this Agreement are deemed confidential and shall not be disclosed by CONTRACTOR without prior written consent by CITY. CITY shall grant such consent if disclosure is legally required. Unless authorized by CITY to be destroyed, all CITY data, documents, and media of any nature provided to CONTRACTOR by CITY in connection with this Agreement, shall be returned to CITY upon the termination of this Agreement. CONTRACTOR'S covenant under this section shall survive the termination of this Agreement. 9. Conflicts of Interest. CONTRACTOR hereby warrants for himself, his employees, and subcontractors that those persons presently have no interest and shall not obtain any interest, direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner with the performance of the services contemplated by this Agreement. No person having such conflicting interest shall be employed by or associated with CONTRACTOR in connection with services to be performed hereunder. CONTRACTOR hereby warrants for himself, his employees, and subcontractors that no such person shall engage in any conduct which would constitute a conflict of interest under any City ordinance, state law or federal statute. 10. Indemnification. A. To the maximum extent permitted by law, CONTRACTOR shall indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, losses, suits, actions, liabilities, costs and/or expenses for any damage due to death or injury to any person and/or damage to any property, other loss of any nature, or breach of any term of this Agreement, resulting from any acts or omissions, including but not limited to, alleged intentional, reckless or negligent acts, errors or omissions, of CONTRACTOR or any of its officers, employees, servants, agents, or subcontractors in the performance of this Agreement. Such costs and expenses shall include reasonable attomeys' fees incurred by counsel of CITY'S choice. B. CONTRACTOR'S obligations under this or any other provision of this Agreement will not be limited by the provisions of any wonders compensation act or similar act. Page 3 3/31/2004 C:~)ocurnents and Settings\Tyler Burton. DMl~Desktop~Dowloads~)eltaPSA.DOC CONTRACTOR expressly waives its statutory immunity under such statutes or laws as to the CITY, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers. C. CITY does not, and shall not, waive any dghts that it may possess against CONTRACTOR because of the acceptance by CITY, or the deposit with CITY, of any insurance policy or certificate required pursuant to this Agreement. This indemnification prevision shall apply regardless of whether or not any insurance policies ara determined to be applicable to the claim, demand, damage, liability, loss, c~st or expense. CONTRACTOR agrees that CONTRACTOR'S covenant under this section shall survive the termination of this Agreement. D. CONTRACTOR agrees to pay all required taxes on amounts paid to CONTRACTOR under this Agreement, and to indemnify and hold CITY harmless from any and all taxes, assessments, penalties, and interest asserted against CITY by reason of the independent contractor relationship created by this Agreement. CONTRACTOR shall fully comply with the workers' compensation laws regarding CONTRACTOR and CONTRACTOR'S employees. CONTRACTOR further agrees to indemnify and hold CITY harmless from any failure of CONTRACTOR to comply with applicable workers' compensation laws. CITY shall have the dght to offset against the amount of any fees due to CONTRACTOR under this Agreement any amount due to CITY from CONTRACTOR as a result of CONTRACTOR'S failure to promptly pay to CITY any reimbursement or indemnification arising under this Section. 11. Insurance. Prior to commencement of work under this Agreement, CONTRACTOR shall submit to the CITY'S Risk Management Office for review a current copy of a certificate or certificates of insurance, together with endorsements, showing that the insurance policies are in effect in the required amounts and form as required below. Upon receipt by the CITY the approved originals will be attached hereto as "Exhibit C u and shall be deemed incorporated herein by reference. A. CONTRACTOR shall at all times during the term of this Agreement caffy, maintain, and keep in full force and effect, insurance as follows: 1. Commercial General Liability Insurance with minimum limits of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) for each occurrence and Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) in the aggregate for any personal injury, death, loss or damage. 2. Automobile Liability Insurance for any owned, non-owned or hired vehicle used in connection with the performance of this Agreement with minimum limits of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per accident and Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) in the aggregate for bodily injury and property damage. 3. Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California. B. CONTRACTOR shall require each of its subcontractors to maintain insurance coverage that meets all of the requirements of this Agreement. Page 4 3/31/2004 C:~Documents and Settings\Tyler Burton.DMl~Desktop~Dowloads~DeltaPSA.DOC C. The policies required by this Agreement shall be issued by an insurer admitted in the State of Califomia and with a rating of at least A: VII in the latest edition of Best's Insurance Guide. D. CONTRACTOR agrees that if CONTRACTOR does not keep the insurance required in this Agreement in full force and effect, CITY may either immediately terminate this Agreement or, if insurance is available at a reasonable cost, CITY may procure the necessary insurance and pay, at CONTRACTOR'S expense, the premium thereon. E. CONTRACTOR shall provide proof that policies of insurance expiring during the term of this Agreement have been renewed or replaced with other policies providing at least the same coverage. Such proof will be furnished at least two weeks pdor to the expiration of the coverages. F. The general liability and automobile policies of insurance shall contain an endorsement naming CITY, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers as additional insureds. All of the policies shall contain an endorsement providing that the policies cannot be canceled or reduced in limits except on thirty (30) days prior written notice by the insurer to CITY. G. The insurance provided by CONTRACTOR shall be primary to any other coverage available to CITY. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by CITY, its officers, employees, agents or volunteers, shall be in excess of CONTRACTOR'S insurance and shall not contribute with it. H. No insurance coverage provided pursuant to this Agreement shall prohibit CONTRACTOR, and CONTRACTOR'S employees, agents or subcontractors, from waiving the right of subrogation prior to a loss. CONTRACTOR hereby waives all dghts of subrogation against CITY. I. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be approved by CITY. At the option of CITY, CONTRACTOR shall either reduce or eliminate the deductibles or self-insured retentions with respect to CITY, or CONTRACTOR shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and expenses, unless otherwise agreed to in writing by CITY. J. Procurement of insurance by CONTRACTOR shall not be construed as a limitation of CONTRACTOR'S liability or as full performance of CONTRACTOR'S duties to indemnify, hold harmless and defend under this Agreement. 12. Cooperation. In the event any claim or action is brought against CITY relating to CONTRACTOR'S performance in connection with this Agreement, CITY shall render such reasonable assistance as CONTRACTOR may require in connection with CONTRACTOR'S obligations under Section 10 hereof. Page 5 3/31/2004 C:~Documents and Settings\Tyler Burton. DMl~Desktop~3owtoads~DeltaPSA.DOC 13. Records and Inspections. CONTRACTOR shall maintain full and accurate records with respect to all matters covered under this Agreement for a period of at least three (3) years. CITY shall have access to such records without charge, during nom3al business hours, and the right to examine and audit the same and to make transcripts therefrom, and to inspect all documents, proceedings, and activities. 14. Termination of Agreement. A. The CITY may terminate this Agreement for any or no reason by providing CONTRACTOR no less than thirty (30) days prior written notice of its intent to terminate. CONTRACTOR may only terminate this Agreement for cause. B. In the event of termination of this Agreement by CITY, due to no fault or failure of performance by CONTRACTOR, CONTRACTOR shall be paid based on the number of records converted and/or scanned which have been satisfactorily produced by CONTRACTOR at the time of termination. In no event shall CONTRACTOR be entitled to receive more than the amount that would be paid to CONTRACTOR for the full performance of the services required by this Agreement. 15. Force Majeure. CONTRACTOR shall not be liable for any failure to perform if CONTRACTOR presents acceptable evidence, in CITY'S sole judgment that such failure was due to causes beyond the control, and without the fault or negligence, of CONTRACTOR. 16. Notices. Any notices, bills, or invoices required by this Agreement shall be deemed received on: (a) the day of delivery if delivered by hand or overnight courier service during CONTRACTOR'S and CITY'S regular business hours or by facsimile before or during CONTRACTOR'S regular business hours; or (b) on the third business day following deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid, addressed as set forth below, or to such other addresses as the Parties may, from time to time, designate in wdting. Page 6 3/31/2004 C:~Documents and Settings\Tyler Burton. DMl~esktop~Dowloads~DeltaPSA.DOC If to CITY: If to CONTRACTOR: City of Rancho Cucamonga Tyler Burton 10500 Civic Center Drive Delta Microlmaging Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9961 N. Lower Sacramento Rd. Stockton, CA 95210 Attn: Debra Adams, City Clerk Facsimile No. (909) 477-2846 Facsimile No. (209) 952-8250 17. Non-Discrimination and Equal Employment Opportunity. In the performance of this Agreement, CONTRACTOR shall not discriminate against any employee, subcontractor, or applicant for employment because of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, ancestry, age, physical or mental handicap, medical condition, or sexual orientation or other basis prohibited by law. CONTRACTOR will take affirmative action to ensure that subcontractors and applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, ancest~j, age, physical or mental handicap, medical condition, or sexual orientation. 18. Compliance with Laws. CONTRACTOR shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, ordinances, codes and regulations in the performance of this Agreement. 19. Prohibition Against Assignment. CONTRACTOR shall not delegate, transfer, subcontract or assign its duties or dghts hereunder, either in whole or in part, without CITY'S prior written consent, and any attempt to do so shall be void and of no effect. CITY shall not be obligated or liable under this Agreement to any party other than CONTRACTOR. 20. Attomeys' Fees. In the event that CITY or CONTRACTOR commences any legal action or proceeding to enforce or interpret the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its costs of suit, including reasonable attorneys' fees. 21. Entire Agreement. This Agreement, and any other documents incorporated herein by specific reference, represents the entire and integrated agreement between CONTRACTOR and CITY with respect to the subject matter contained herein. This Agreement supersedes all prior oral or written negotiations, representations or agreements. Any modification of this Agreement will be effective only if it is in writing and executed by CITY and CONTRACTOR. 22. Exhibits and Conflicting Provisions. All documents referenced as exhibits in this Agreement are hereby incorporated in this Agreement. In the event of any material discrepancy between the express provisions of this Agreement and the provisions of any document incorporated by reference, the provisions of this Agreement shall prevail. 23. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 24. Severability. Wherever possible, each provision of this Agreement shall be interpreted in such a manner as to be valid under applicable law. If any provision of this Agreement is Page 7 3/31/2004 C:~Documents and Settings~Tyler Bu~ton. DMl~Desktop~owloads~DeltaPSA.DOC determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall nevertheless continue in full force and effect. 25. Captions. The captions used in this Agreement are solely for reference and the convenience of the Parties. Said captions are not a part of the Agreement, in no way bind, limit, or describe the scope or intent of any provision, and shall have no etf~ct upon the construction or interpretation of any provision herein. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA: DELTA MICRO IMAGING: William J. Alexander, Mayor ~ Date Date ~/"~1/0~-~ Page 8 3/31/2004 C:~Documents and Settings\Tyler Bur~on. DMl~Desktop~Dowloads~DeltaPSA.DOC EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF WORK The City Clerk's Office is responsible for the City's vital original hard copy records and long-term records, as well as various other media such as CD-ROM, videotapes, microfilm/microfiche and City Council and Commission meeting recordings. The City Clerk's Office delegates departmental record management functions to the City's departments. The long-term objectives of this effort are to convert the City's current and future records from paper and microfilm to electronic storage, which will facilitate sharing and retrieving data intereally. The City currently utilizes an Electronic Imaging System (ELS) called Lasen=iche (Version 6). All references to ElS in this RFP specifically relate to LaserFiche. Required Backfile Tasks Prospective vendor must perform document preparation as part of the per-image cost, to include: · Scanning · Indexing to all applicable tasks · Audit of the quantity of pages received, captured and returned · Certified document destruction. Scan Microfilm The City may require conversion of microfilmed images where paper no longer exists. The following volumes of each format are estimates only for a one (1) year period: · 16mm roll microfilm images - 35 rolls of building permits & attachments, 98 roils of various agenda packets, 47 rolls of various Planning & Engineering documents · 35mm roll microffim images, 165 rolls of various Building, Planning and Engineering documents Micrefilm conversion must include: a. All images scanned to 200 dpi resolution b. Images to be single-page TIFF Group 4 c. Each set of images between 'blips" will be treated as a separate file d. File names are to reflect index-specific fields e. Anticipated indexing fields include, but may not be limited to, the following. Not alt fields will be required for all images: i. Address ii. Street Name iii.Unit Number (if applicable) iv. Description v. Permit Number vi. Department Name vii.Document Type viii. Date ix. Key word, subject, contract number or other information f. Indexing of images will be in a format that is compatible with the ElS Page 9 3/31/2004 C:~Documents and Settings\Tyler Burton. DMl~,Desktop~Dowloads\DeitaPSA.DOC g. Service bureau is to provide quality control (QC) functions such as image rotation, image deskew and despeckle, and background suppression. h. All images and indexes will be retumed on properly indexed CD-ROM disks. Scan Larqe Format Drawin(Is The City requires scanning of an ongoing volume of large format drawings and maps currently on various mediums such as, but not limited to, Mylar, bund, linen and sepia. A portion of these maps and drawings may be fragile due to age and wear. Volumes of each format are estimates only for a one (1) year pe~ed: · 18" x 26' and la~ger - QTY: 26,500 +/- Large format conversions must include: a. Documents will be scanned on a production scanner that will produce TIFF images with a resolution of 200 or 300 dpi, based on the document requirement. b. Images are to be indexed by directory names (field specific name), file names (field specific name), and specified fields. c. Anticipated indexing fields include the following. Not all fields will be required for all documents: i. Address ii. Street Name iii.Unit Number (if applicable) iv. Desc. flption v. Permit Number vi. Department vii.Document Type viii. Project I.D. or Name ix. Year Approved x. Key word, subject, contract number or other information d. Indexing of images will be in a format that is compatible with the ElS e. Service bureau is to provide QC functions such as image rotation, image deskew and despckie, and background suppression. f. All images and indexes will be retumed on pmpedy indexed CD-ROM disks. Page 10 3/31/2004 C:~Documents and Settings\Tyler Burton. DMl~Desktop~)owloads~DeitaPSA.DOC $c~n8I" The City will require the convemion of supporting documentation, which am paper-based pages to be scanned at 200 or 300 dpi, based on the condition of the originals and the resulting image quality. Scanning will require duplex capabilities. Indexing will not be required for the majority of these documents because they will become a part of the file which they support. Volumes of each format are estimates only for a one (1) year period: · 8 % documents - QTY: 25,000 pages +/- Specifications for this process will include: a. Documents will be scanned on a production scanner that will produce single-page TIFF Group 4 images b. Images will be merged with the appropriate file so as to result in one file comp~.%~l of all related documents. Page 11 3/31/2004 C:~Documents and Settings\Tyler Burton.DMl~Desktop~)owloads~DeltaPSA.DOC T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE: April 21, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Duane A. Baker, Assistant to the City Manager SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT ADVANCE AND REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT WITH BCA DEVELOPMENT, INC. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached Advance and Reimbursement Agreement related to a proposed Community Facilities District (CFD) to fund public improvements. This agreement provides that the developer deposit funds to pay for all services associated with the formation of the CFD. The initial deposit is $50,000. If a CFD is formed, this agreement provides for the developer to be reimbursed from the bond proceeds. BACKGROUND The proposed CFD is being requested by BCA Development, Inc. to fund public improvements and facility fees associated with the Rancho Etiwanda Estates residential development. This project consists of 632 single-family residential units. The development is located at the northern terminus of Day Creek Boulevard. The CFD is being contemplated to fund the extension of Day Creek Boulevard, improvements to Etiwanda Avenue, new regional and local storm drains, park fees and school fees. City policy is to require anyone requesting the formation of a CFD to pay all of the associated costs. Further, it has been the City's practice to allow the developers to have these costs reimbursed from the proceeds of the bonds associated with the CFD. This does not affect the City in any way as the payments for the bonds are coming solely from the developer. Also, should the City Council decide during the CFD public hearing not to form the CFD, the City is in no way obligated to repay the developer. Page 2 April 21, 2004 APPROVAL OF A COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT ADVANCE AND REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT WITH BCA DEVELOPMENT, INC. This initial agreement provides for a deposit of $50,000 to pay for the City's Financial Advisor, Bond Counsel and Special Tax Consultant. Should the City require the services of other professionals, we have the ability to request that additional funds be deposited to pay for those services. This agreement provides for the developer to pay all costs associated with this process. This agreement will not affect the City's budget. Finally, this agreement will facilitate financing for needed public improvements in the community. For these reasons, it is recommended that the City Council approve this Advance and Reimbursement Agreement. Respectfully submitted, Duane A. Baker Assistant to the City Manager COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT ADVANCE AND REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT (the "Agreement"), dated as of April 21,2004, by and between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation (the "City") and BCA DEVELOPMENT, iNC., ("Applicant"). RECITALS A. The Applicant proposes to develop that property located within the City commonly known as Rancho Etiwanda Estates. The Applicant has made application with the City to request that the City initiate proceedings under the previsions of the "Mello- Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982," as amended, (Government Code Section 53311 and following), to form a community facilities district (the "Community Facilities District") to finance the acquisition and/or construction of certain public improvements necessary to serve such development or required to be constructed as a result of the development. B. In order to evaluate the financial feasibility of the proposed Community Facilities District and to undertake the proceedings to consider the formation of such Community Facilities District (the "Formation Proceedings") and to subsequently authorize, issue and sell bonds of the Community Facilities District to finance the acquisition and/or construction of the public improvements (the "Issuance Proceedings"), it will be necessary for the City to incur certain expenses. Section 53318(d) of the Act provides that the City may require that an application for formation of a community facilities district be accompanied by the payment in a fee in the amount which the City Council determines is sufficient to compensate the City for all costs incurred in conducting the Formation Proceedings and the Issuance Proceedings. C. The Applicant has agreed to advance funds, and has advanced $50,000 to the City for the payment of all initial consulting and administration costs and expenses related to the Formation Proceedings and the Issuance Proceedings. Such monies shall be subject to reimbursement or credit pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement upon the successful sale of bonds for the Community Facilities District and the receipt by the City of the proceeds of such bonds. D. Pursuant to Section 53314.9 of the Act, the City Council is authorized to accept advances of funds from any source, including, but not limited to, private persons or private entities, and to enter into an agreement with such person or entity to repay all or a portion of the funds under certain conditions. E. The parties hereto wish to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Sections 53318(d) and 53314.9 of the Act to provide for the advance of monies and reimbursement or credit for monies so advanced. WBD~294293.1 1 AGREEMENT The pa,rties hereto, for mutual consideration, agree as follows: SECTION 1. Advances. The Applicant shall advance monies to the City in such amounts and at such times as specified below to pay all costs and expenses incurred by the City in undertaking both the Formation Proceedings and the Issuance Proceedings, including without limitation, the following: A. Special Tax Consultant services; B. Bond counsel services; C. Financial advisory services; D. Appraisal and market absorption services; and E. City staff and City Attorney services. All such costs and expenses are collectively referred to as the "Formation and Issuance Costs." Advances have and shall be made to the City pursuant to the following schedule: 1. The Applicant has advanced to the City the sum of $50,000, receipt of which is acknowledged by the City. 2. If monies in addition to the initial advance are necessary to pay for the Formation and Issuance Costs, the City shall as necessary and from time to time make written demand upon the Applicant and the Applicant shall immediately thereafter, within five (5) working days, deposit said monies with the City to pay for the balance of the Formation and Issuance Costs. If the full amount of any future advance requested by the City is not timely received, all Formation Proceedings and Issuance Proceedings shall be suspended until the full amount of such advance is received. SECTION 2. Records. The City agrees to keep records consistent with its regular accounting practices of the amount of monies advanced from the Applicant and the expenditure of such monies. Additionally, the City shall enter into and maintain contracts with all consultants that shall specify the scope of services and compensation to be paid to all such consultants. Such records and contracts shall be available for review by the Applicant during normal business hours upon reasonable notice to the City. SECTION 3. Reimbursement. If the Community Facilities District is formed and special tax bonds are issued and sold by the Community Facilities District, monies WBD~94293.1 2 advanced by such Applicant pursuant to this Agreement shall be reimbursed, without interest, to the Applicant solely from the proceeds of such bonds. SECTION 4. Ownership of Documents. All plans, specifications, reports, appraisals and other documentation as prepared as a part of the Proceedings shall become the property of the City, regardless as to whether the Community Facilities District is actually formed. SECTION 5. No Obligation to Form Community Facilities District; Abandonment of Proceedings. The Applicant acknowledges that the decision of the City Council to form the Community Facilities District is an exercise of the legislative authority of the City Council and that the City may not enter into a contract to obligate the City Council to exercise its legislative discretion in a particular manner. This Agreement does not, therefore, in any way create a contractual, legal or equitable obligation of or commitment by the City to approve the formation of the Community Facilities District. The City expressly reserves the right to abandon the Proceedings for any reason at any time prior to the completion thereof. Should the Applicant elect to abandon the Proceedings, the Applicant shall provide written notification of such election to the City and request the City to immediately terminate all consulting agreements and use all efforts to minimize any and all additional Formation and Issuance Costs. If the Proceedings to form the Community Facilities District are not completed and are abandoned for any reason at any time prior to the successful sale of bonds or the City is unable for any reason to issue or sell the bonds, there will be no obligation on the part of the City to reimburse the Applicant for any monies previously advanced pursuant to this Agreement. In such event, the City does, however, agree to return to Applicant any monies previously advanced by Applicant, without interest, which remain on deposit with the City and which the City determines are in excess of the amount necessary to pay for any outstanding Formation and Issuance Costs previously incurred by the City. SECTION 6. Mediation. The parties hereby agree that, claims, disputes or controversies of whatever nature, arising out of, in connection with, or in relation to the interpretation, performance or breach of this Agreement (or any other agreement contemplated by or related to this Agreement) (collectively, a "Dispute"), shall be settled promptly and expeditiously, at the request of any party to this Agreement, exclusively by mediation conducted in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Each party shall appoint a mediator within seven days of receipt of notice of Dispute and the mediators selected by the parties shall jointly select another mediator within 7 days of their appointment. The final decision regarding the Dispute shall be determined by a majority vote of the mediators within 20 business days of the appointment of the mediators and in accordance with the Commercial Mediation Rules of the American Arbitration Association then in effect. The parties expressly agree that the mediators shall determine the discovery methods that shall be available to the parties under this Section 6 as appropriate under the circumstances. Each party hereto expressly consents to, and waives any future objection to, such forum and mediation rules. Judgment upon any award may be entered by any state or federal WBD~294293.1 3 x7 court having jurisdiction thereof. The mediators' fees and any filing or other fees required by the Commercial Mediation Rules shall, to the extent required, shall be shared equally by the parties. Adherence to this dispute resolution process shall not limit the right of the parties hereto to obtain any provisional remedy, including without limitation, injunctive or similar relief, from any court of competent jurisdiction as may be necessary to protect their respective rights and interests pending mediation. Notwithstanding the foregoing sentence, this dispute resolution procedure is intended to be the exclusive method of resolving any Disputes arising out of or relating to this Agreement. SECTION 7. Attorneys' Fees, If any party brings an action to enforce its rights hereunder, the prevailing party in any such action shall be entitled to its reasonable attorneys' fees to be paid by the losing party as fixed by the court. SECTION 8. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. SECTION 9. Authority to Execute Agreement. The City and the Applicant represent that the individuals signing this Agreement have full right and authority to bind their respective parties to this Agreement. SECTION 10. Successor and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding on and inure to the benefit of the respective parties and their respective heirs, legal representatives, successors and assigns. Applicant may not assign its rights or obligations hereunder except upon written notice to City within ten (10) days of the date of such assignment indicating the name and address of the assignee. Upon such notice and the assumption by the assignee in writing delivered to the City of the rights, duties and obligations of the Applicant arising under or from this Agreement, Applicant shall be released for all future duties or obligations arising under or from this Agreement. SECTION 11. No Third Party Beneficiaries. No person or entity shall be deemed to be a third party beneficiary hereof, and nothing in this Agreement (either express or implied) is intended to confer upon any person or entity, other than the City, the Community Facilities District and the Applicant, any rights, remedies, obligations or liabilities under or by reason of this Agreement. SECTION 12. Non-Liability of Officials and Employees of the City. No representative, agent, attorney, consultant, or employee of the City shall personally be liable to the Applicant in the event of any default by the City under the terms of this Agreement. SECTION 13. Release. Except in the event of the City's sole negligence or willful misconduct, the Applicant hereby fully and irrevocably releases, waives, acquits and discharges the City and its elective or appointive boards, council members, officers, and employees of and from any and all claims, rights, grievances, demands, damages, debts, WBD~94293.1 4 liabilities, obligations, costs, expenses, causes of action, or damages of any nature, including attorneys' fees, whether known or unknown, existing or potential, anticipated or unanticipated, or which may hereafter be sustained, arising out of, or related to, this Agreement. SECTION 14. Singular and Plural; Gender. Whenever used herein, the singular number shall include the plural, the plural number shall include the singular, and the masculine feminine or neuter gender shall include the others whenever the context of the Agreement so indicates. SECTION 15. Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire Agreement between the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof. This Agreement may not be altered, modified or amended except by an instrument in writing executed by all of the parties. SECTION 16. Governing Law. This Agreement has been executed in and shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. SECTION 17. Construction. This Agreement shall be construed as a whole and in accordance with its fair meaning. Captions and organizations are for convenience and shall not be used in construing meaning. SECTION 18. Severability. If any term, covenant, condition or provision of this Agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable the remainder of the provision thereof shall remain in full force and effect and shall in no way be affected, impaired or invalidated thereby. SECTION 19. Notices. All notices and demands shall be given in writing by personal delivery or first-class mail, postage prepaid. Notices shall be addressed as appears below for the respective party; provided that, if any party gives notice of a change of name of address, notices to the giver of that notice shall thereafter be given as demanded in that notice. Notices shall be deemed received seventy-two (72) hours after deposit in the United States mail. CITY: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attention: City Manager Copy to: Best Best & Krieger LLP 402 West Broadway, 13th Floor San Diego, CA 92101 Attention: Warren Diven WBD~94293.1 5 Richards, Watson & Gershon Attorneys at Law Number Once Civic Center Circle Brea, CA 92822-1059 Attention: James L. Markman APPLICANT: BCA DEVELOPMENT, INC. 17780 Fitch Street, Suite 120 Irvine, CA 92614 Attention: Ben C. Anderson, President SECTION 20. Time of the Essence, Time is of the'essence in the performance of the parties respective obligations herein contained. SECTION 21. Waiver. The waiver by one party of the performance of any covenant, condition or promise shall not invalidate this Agreement, nor shall it be considered a waiver by him of any other covenant, condition or promise. The waiver by either or both parties of the time for performing any act shall not constitute a waiver of the time for performing any other act or an identical act required to be performed at a later time. The exercise of any remedy provided in this Agreement shall not be a waiver of any consistent remedy provided by law, and any provision of this Agreement for any remedy shall not exclude other consistent remedies unless they are expressly excluded. SECTION 22. Amendment. No provision of this Agreement may be modified, waived, amended or added to except by a writing signed by the party against which the enforcement of such modification, waiver, amendment or addition is or may be sought. [Remainder of this page intentionally left blank. Next page is the signature page.] WBD~294293.1 6 Signature Page to Community Facilities District Reimbursement Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and BCA Development, Inc. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and Applicant have executed this Agreement thereby indicating that they have read and understood same, and indicate their full and complete consent to its terms. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA By: Attest: City Clerk BCA DEVELOPMENT, hNC. corporation By: WBD\294293.1 7 ¢/ I~ a N C H O C U C a M O N G A CO~I~U~I?¥ ~1~ l~VI Cl~& DA~: April 21, 2004 TO: Mayor and Membem of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager ~M: Kevin McArdle, Community Se~ices Director BY: Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III ~ SU~E~: REQUEST TO APPROVE AND APPROPRIATE FUNDS RECEIVED FROM THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT FOR A G~NT IN THE AMOUNT OF $804,735 FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A SENIOR CENTER AT CENT~L PARK (FUND 1239303-5650/1496239-0) RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve a grant agreement and appropriate funds received from the U.S. Depa~ment of Housing and Urban Development for a grant in the amOunt of $804,735 for construction of a senior center at Central Park (fund 1239303- 5650/1496239-0). BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS With assistance from Congressman David Dmier, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has received ~nding in the amount of $804,735 from the U.S. Depa~ment of Housing and Urban Development for an EDI-Special Proje~ Grant No. B-03-SP-CA-0115, as funded by Congress in the VA-HUD-Independent Agencies Act for FY 2003 (PH 108-7). An application package has been submiEed for this funding and staff is in the progress of finalizing environmental documents for the release of these critical funds for the ~nstruction of the senior center at Central Park. FISCAL IMPACT The grant requires no matching funds. Kevi Comr Jni~ Se~ices Director h~COMMSER~uncil&Boa~siCi~unci~Sta~epo~s~O~WUDSenio~nte~ntFunds4.21.04.~c R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A C 0 MI~IUNITY ~ E R Vl CE S Staff Report DATE: April 21, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director BY: Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III SUBJECT: REVIEVV AND CONFIRMATION OF EPICENTER IMPROVEMENTS BY VAJIFY BASEBALL, INC. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council review and confirm Epicenter improvements proposed by Valley Baseball, Inc (Quakes). BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS As required in the Amended and Restated Lease between the City and Quakes, Valley Baseball, Inc. has notified the City of their desire to make improvements around and to the Epicenter. These improvements will be at the sole expense of the Quakes and will follow all rules and regulations as outlined in the Lease. The identified improvements include: · installation of a new audio system within the framework of the seating area to replace current centerfield audio system. This system will have a minimum of nine (9) speakers and use existing amplifiers currently at the Epicenter. · Remodel and reconstruction of the front serving areas of the "Caf~ and Pavilion" concession stands. · Convert four individual luxury suites (Suites 12 & 13 and Suites 6 & 7) into 1 luxury suite and to create a video room for the new scoreboard. Community Services, Engineering and Building and Safety staff have reviewed the proposed modifications at the time the request was received and have found no concerns regarding the Quakes' request. Therefore, staff recommends that the City Council confirm the Epicenter improvements proposed by the Quakes. FISCAL IMPACT There ~1 be no cost to the City associated with any of the identified improvements. v KCevin'-1 Commbnity Services Director __,~ R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A COHHUNITY SERVICES Staff Report DATE: April 21,2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director BY: Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED LEASE AGREEMENT BETVVEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND VALLEY BASEBALL, INC. RELATING TO THE EXPANDED PARKING LOT REIMBURSEMENT RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Cit~, Council approve the attached Amendment No. 4 to the Lease Agreement between the City and Valley Baseball, Inc. (Quakes) relating to reimbursement for the expanded parking lot. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Construction of an electrical substation in the southwestern corner of the Expanded Parking Lot (Parking Lot G) at the Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter commenced in September 2003, and resulted in a loss of approximately sixty-three parking spaces available to the Quakes for game day and special event revenue. Due to the unavailability of approximately 63 parking spaces, the Quakes anticipate a loss of approximately $3,880 in game day parking revenue and an additional loss of approximately $900 in future special event earnings. Therefore, based upon this analysis staff recommends that the City Council approve Amendment Number 4 to the Amended and Restated Lease between the City and the Quakes that results in change of annual expanded parking lot reimbursement to the City from $72,000 to $67, 248. These annual totals reflect the monthly decrease from the existing $6,000 per month to the new rate of $5,604 per month. CITY COUNCIL CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENT 4 TO THE AMENDED & RESTATED LEASE BETWEEN CITY & VALLEY BASEBALL, INC. APRIL 21, 2004 PAGE 2 FISCAL IMPACT City revenues from the Quakes use of the expanded parking lot will be reduced by $4,752 per year. mitted, Kevin ~cArdl~ Community Services Director Attachment h~MMSERV~C~unci~&B~ards~cityc~unci~Sta~Rep~/ts~2~4~QuakesAmendment4~4~21~4~d~c AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO AMENDED AND RESTATED LEASE BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ("CITY" HEREINAFTER) AND VALLEY BASEBALL CLUB, INC. ("TENANT" HEREINAFTER) A. Recitals. (i) During August, 1999, City and Tenant entered into the above-referenced Amended and Restated Lease which has been amended three times prior to this Amendment No. 4. Said Lease as so amended three times hereinafter is referred to as "thc Lease." (ii) Thc parties wish to again amend the Lease in reference to the reduction of Improvement Rent provided for in Section 4.08 of the Lease because of the loss of sixty-three (63) parking spaces in the Expanded Parking Lot due to Cit?s construction of an electrical substation. B. Amendment No. 4. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Section 4.08 of the Lease hereby is amended by replacing the sum of Six Thousand Dollars ($6,000.00) provided for in the first sentence thereof with the sum of Five Thousand Six Hundred Four Dollars ($5,604.00), effective as of October 1, 2003. 2. Other than as expressly amended hereby, the Lease, and each and every term and provision thereof, shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have entered into this Amendment No. 4 as of the dates stated below as to each such party. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Dated: By: Mayor Dated: Attest: City Clerk VALLEY BASEBALL CLUB, INC. Dated: By: President 11231-0001\753804vl .doc ~ I~ A N C H O C U C ^ ivl O N G A C 0 M M U N I TY ~ l~l~VIC~:& SmffRetx DATE: April 21,2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director BY: Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III ~)? SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED LEASE AGREEMENT BE-rVVEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND VALLEY BASEBALL, INC. RELATING TO REPLACEMENT OF THE SCOREBOARD RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached Amendment No. 5 to the Lease Agreement between the City and Valley Baseball, Inc. (Quakes) relating to replacement of the scoreboard. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The City has received official notification from the Quakes of their desire to replace the scoreboard referred to in the Amended and Restated Lease Agreement with a new right field scoreboard which will include the following: · 13.3' x 23.6' 23mm ProStar Video Display · 3.6' x 21.7' 46mm Galaxy Matrix Display · Custom scoreboard retrofit with LED amber digits and two (2) LED amber 10.6' x 5.3' 34mm Team Name Message Centers · 6' x 34.6" LED Identification Display- duel sided The specifications for the new scoreboard have been reviewed by the Community Services Department, the Engineering Division and Building and Safety and no concerns regarding the Quakes request have been identified. Therefore, staff recommends that the City Council approve Amendment Number 5 to the Amended and Restated Lease. FISCAL IMPACT There v be no cost to the City associated with approval of this Amendment. ~,Fdle -' CommL ~ity Services Director ~ 7 AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO AMENDED AND RESTATED LEASE BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ("CITY" HEREINAFrER) AND VALLEY BASEBALL CLUB, INC. ("TENANT" HEREINAFTER) A. Recitals. (i) During August, 1999, City and Tenant entered into the above-referenced Amended and Restated Lease which has been amended four times prior to this Amendment No. 5. Said Lease as so amended four times hereinafter is referred to as "the Lease." (ii) The parties wish to again amend the Lease to provide for a new right field scoreboard. B. Amendment No. 5. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Section 32.01 of the Lease hereby is amended to replace the scoreboard referred to in the Lease with a new right field scoreboard which will include the following: 13.3' x 23.6~ 23mm ProStar Video Display 3.6' x 21.7' 46man Galaxy Matrix Display Custom scoreboard retrofit with LED amber digits and two (2) LED amber 10.6' x 5.3' 34mm Team Name Message Centers 6' x 34.6' LED Identification Display - dual sided 2. Other than as expressly amended hereby, the Lease, and each and every term and provision thereof, shall remain in full force and effect. 1N WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have entered into this Amendment No. 5 as of the dates stated below as to each such party. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Dated: By: Mayor Dated: Attest: City Clerk VALLEY BASEBALL CLUB, INC. Dated: By: President 11231-0001 \769467v I .doc R A N H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT StaffReport DATE: April 21, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF PARCEL MAP 16238 AND MONUMENTATION DEPOSIT CASH DEPOSIT, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF MILL1KEN AVENUE AND 6TM STREET, SUBMITTED BY SILVER OAK DEVELOPMENT RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, approving Parcel Map 16238, accepting the monumentation cash deposit and authorizing the Mayor to sign said agreement and the City Clerk to cause said map to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tentative Parcel Map 16238, located at the southwest corner of Milliken Avenue and 6t~ Street, in the Mixed Use District of the Rancho Cucamonga Subarea 18 Specific Plan, was approved by the Planning Commission on October 22, 2003. This project is for a subdivision of 3 parcels on 3.47 acres of land. The Developer, Silver Oak Development, is submitting a monumentation cash deposit to guarantee the setting of the monuments in the following amounts: Monumentation Cash Deposit: $2,550.00 The Improvement Agreement and other related bonds were accepted under DRC2003-00330 by the City Council on December 17, 2003. Copies of the securities are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully submitted, William J. O Neil City Engineer WJO:WV:tch ~ Attachments 6TH STREET ~1~ 4TH STREET 0 SAN (~, BERNARDIN( FRWY N CITY OF rip, M: ~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA TrrL~:~ ENGIN-g,E~ING DIVISION SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE OF PERFORMANCE (SETTING OF FINAL MONUMENTS) City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia 91730 Gentlemen: Pursuant to Chapter 4, Article 9, Section 66497 of the Government Code, the undersigned hereby agrees that all monuments shown on the final map of Parcel Map 16238 are to be set and furnished by the subdivider's engineer or surveyor as specified in the Engineer's or Surveyor's Certificate and agrees to furnish the notes thereon to complete all engineering requirements specified in Section 66497, of the Government Code. The undersigned hands you herewith the sum of $ $ :~550.00 (Receipt No..~'-~-~,~.~ ) as a cash deposit, said deposit to guarantee that the monuments will be set and the notes furnished as above provided on or before the date specified in the Engineer's or Surveyor's certificate and that the engineer or surveyor will be paid by the undersigned upon satisfactory completion of such work. It is further understood and agreed that in the event the undersigned fails to complete the above requirements within the time specified, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to complete said requirements or cause them to be completed and the cost thereof is to be a charge against said cash deposit, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to make the necessary transfer from said cash deposit to the credit for the proper city fund. It is.further agreed that if the undersigned does not present evidence to the City Council that he has paid the engineer or surveyor for the setting of the final monuments, and if the engineer or surveyor gives the notices prescribed in Section 66497 of the Government Code, the City shall pay to said engineer or surveyor, the cash deposit herein made. If the cost of completing said requirements exceeds the amount of the cash deposit, the undersigned agrees to pay the difference within thirty (30) days after receiving written statement from the City of Rancho Cuc .amonga specifying the amount of the difference between the cash deposit and the actual cost of said requirements, Cordially, ~ ~ Signature /o,,z,~.~-., .c~ Title · ~//.~/2~, ~ Date The depositer of record (for return of any portion of the cash deposit) shall be ~IZX' ~ /~J~5~ Z~'2--~'~:2 Address NOTE: TO BE SUBMITTED FULLY FILLED OUT AND SIGNED IN TRIPLICATE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA N o ENGINEERING DIVISION OFFICIAL RECEIPT NAME: 0"/~///'~ ~' Ag~,,~/~-~., 74 ZZ~ Project No: ADDRESS: ~.,.~Z~Z'/~ .~?~. , ,~' - Prepared By: ' PHONE: ,~ ~- ENGINEER~G FEES: Plan Check Public Work Inspection Fee map Contract Bid Document street Overloa~ideload Pe~it sto~ ~ain Standard Drawings ~ Leg~ description 1 ~ 1-000-4570 hydrology Bid Packet landscape ~sc l-CiW 2-~A Lot Line Adjustment l-City 2-~A Improv Ague Ext Merger TRUSTS (Refundable): S~eet Vacation Monumentafion 1882-000-2312 Printing St Improvement Attach estimate 1001-000-4570 1882-000-2314 Reappoaioment Cons~ Pe~t 1882-000-2315 1100-000-4901 Maintenance Retention Basin (Copy to Assess Revenue) 1882-000-2322 Mailing Fee ~blic Works OT Inspect Deposit 1001-205-5200 1882-000-2319 TOTAL IN-L~U ~ES: Location Amount Median Island Utility Undergrounding 1882-000-2328 St. Light Energy Deposit -000-4808 Miscellaneous Comments: Form No.' ENG51450 White-Engineering File Yellow-Engineering Log Pink-Finance C~SH]ER i~: CSF~4jS~ TIME: TOTAl. ~'~ ~I .i: 2,558.00 ~gCEiVEi~ rr,- , ,-V,.[.P,,JII i L.L. ~.75 E R~ISg~ ~LVE RESOLUTION NO. ~)/'//" //25 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NO. 16238 AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOS1T. WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map No. 16238, submitted by Silver Oak Development, and consisting of a subdivision of 3.47 acres of land into 3 parcels, located at the southeast comer of Milliken Avenue and 6th Street, in the Mixed Use District of the Rancho Cucamonga Subarea 18 Specific Plan, was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on October 22, 2003; and WHEREAS, Parcel Map No. 16238 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on the Tentative Parcel Map; and WHEREAS, all the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met by posting the Monumentation Cash Deposit by Silver Oak Development, as developer; and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Monumentation Cash Deposit submitted by said developer be and the same is hereby approved and that said Parcel Map No. 16238 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. T H E C I T Y 0 F l~AN C H 0 C U CAH 0 N GA Staff Report DATE: April 21,2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Michael TenEyck, Administrative Resources Manager SUBJECT: Approve And Authorize The City Manager and or his designee to Sign The Distribution And Service Extension Agreement With Regency Realty Group, Inc. and future Distribution And Service Extension Agreements along with amendments thereto for the extension of electric utilities within the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility Service Area. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council Approve And Authorize The City Manager and or his designee to Sign The Distribution And Service Extension Agreement With Regency Realty Group, Inc. and future Distribution And Service Extension Agreements along with amendments thereto for the extension of electric utilities within the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility Service Area. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: On August 31, 2001, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council authorized the creation and operation of a municipally owned utility for the purpose of providing various utility services. Subsequently, on August 21, 2002, the Redevelopment Agency authorized the filing of a Wholesale Distribution Access Tariff (WDAT) Application with Southern California Edison Company for the provision of electric service to the Victoria Arbors development area by the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility. This development area will receive permanent electric service from the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility via a proposed electrical substation facility to being built at the southeast corner of Rochester Avenue and Stadium Parkway. The CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT APPROVAL OF DISTRIBUTION LINE EXTENSION WITH REGENCY REALTY GROUP April 21, 2004 PAGE 2 substation began construction on October 13, 2003 and will be operational March 1, 2004; to meet the Victoria Arbors development area scheduled operational date. On September 17, 2003 and November 12, 2003, the City Council award construction contracts for the installation of the Municipal Utilities backbone infrastructure which runs north along Rochester Ave. from the substation to Foothill Blvd. and then east along Foothill Blvd. to Day Creek Blvd. then north on Day Creek Blvd. to Base Line Rd. As new development within the Municipal Utility service area takes place, each development will be condition to extend the City's Utility infrastructure to service their development. Each new development will be required to enter into Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility standard Distribution And Service Extension Agreement. The Agreement Outlines the Applicants responsibilities for construction of the distribution system that will serve the development. Staff is requesting administrative authorization to execute these agreements in order to maintain consistency with standard utility practices of Investor own utilities. In addition, the authorization, will allow developers to begin construction activities in a timelier manner. The Distribution And Service Extension Agreement With Regency Realty Group, Inc., which has been reviewed and approved by the City Attorney, outlines the responsibilities for construction of the distribution system that will serve the development site and affirms the role of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility as the retail provider of electricity. Execution of this agreement will allow Regency Realty Group, Inc., to move forward with the construction in a timely manner. Respectfully Submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT StaffRe rt DA'IF_: April 21, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Karen Tarlton, Public Services Tech I SUBJECT: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND, FOR TRACT 13835, LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHLAND AVENUE AND ROCHESTER AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY SHEFFIELD HOMES, L.L.C. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond, for Tract 13835, located on the northeast corner of Highland Avenue and Rochester Avenue submitted by Sheffield Homes, L.L.C.. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. Developer: Sheffield Homes, EEC. 3400 Central Avenue, Suite 325 Riverside, CA 92506 Release: Bond No. 3SM 887 328 00-A $152,840.00 Respectfully submitted, Wil~i~m J. O Nei~ City Engineer WdO:KT:dlw 7¢ ~ )...~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Stafl:Re rt DALE: April 21,2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Karen Tarlton, Public Services Tech I SUBJECT: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND, FOR TRACT 13851, LOCATED NORTH OF WILSON AVENUE AND WEST OF DEER CREEK CHANNEL, SUBMITTED BY DPDG FUND I, LLC. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 13851, located north of Wilson Avenue and west of Deer Creek Channel, submitted by DPDG Fund I, LLC. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. Developer: DPDG Fund I, LLC 8300 Utica Avenue, Suite 273 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Release: Bond No. BE2638267 $85,240.00 Respectfully submitted, Williad~ J. O'Neil City Engineer W JO: KT:dlw Attachmer~t HILLSJDE TRACT 13851 WILSON BANYAN '" HIOHLAND UPLAND TORIA BASELINE FONTANA THE CITY OF R~HO Chk2~A f~DNOA 41h ONTAI~IO EI'!GIN E ERIN G DEPARTMENT Staff Report DALE: April 21, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Karen Tarlton, Public Services Tech I SUBJECT: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BONDS, FOR TRACT 13270, LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF MILLIKEN AVENUE AND CHURCH STREET, SUBMITTED BY LEWIS HOMES. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bonds, for Tract 13270, located on the northwest corner of Milliken Avenue and Church Street submitted by Lewis Homes. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. Developer: Lewis Homes P. O. Box 670 Upland, CA 91785 Release: Bond No. 114983S $50,000.00 Bond No. 966552S $68,600.00 Bond No. 966555S $14,600.00 Bond No. 966554S $75,800.00 Bond No. 966550S $48,600.00 Respectfully submitted, vvilliab0/d O Neil City Engineer WJO:KT:dlw I~ A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DE PART,lENT StaffRe rt DA3E: April 21, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Karen Tarlton, Public Services Tech I SUBJECT: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BONDS, FOR TRACT 15875- 1, LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND DAY CREEK BOULEVARD, SUBMITTED BY KAUFMAN AND BROAD OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond, for Tract 15875-1, located on the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard submitted by Kaufman and Broad of Southern California, Inc. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. Developer: Kaufman and Broad of Southern California, Inc. 801 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 201 Pomona, CA 91768 Release: Bond No. 22 70 58 $573,600.00 Bond No. 111 2741 5799 $58,700.00 Respectfully submitted, W~ttam J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:KT:dlw Attachment Vicinity Map I 210 Vicinity Map for Tract 15875 R ^ N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Staff Report DALE: April 21,2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: James T. Harris, Associate Eng neer~TJ~~'~' Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Tech~'~'i~n~ SUBJECT: RELEASE OF FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND NO. 612882 IN THE AMOUNT OF $50,655.00, FOR THE IN-ROADWAY WARNING LIGHTS AT 19TM STREET (SR 30) AND JASPER STREET, CONTRACT NO. 02-091 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release Faithful Performance Bond No. 612882 in the amount of $50,855.00 for the In-Roadway Warning Lights at 19m Street (SR 30) and Jasper Street, Contract No. 02-091. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. Contractor: New West Signal 14055 Foothill Boulevard Fontana, CA 92335 Respectfully submitted, Willi~/~. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:JTH/I~O:Is Attachments JASPER ELEMENTAllY SCHOOL I~1~I' ROAD~D£ SIGN UOUK'(~D OK EXIST CAHTILL'VE~ ~HING 8F..ACONS · ' · FIGURI~. "A" R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DE~OAR TMENT Staff R loort DALE: April 2t, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Karen Tarlton, Public Services Tech I SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION, FOR TRACT 161 t 6, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BANYAN STREET AND EAST AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY KB HOME GREATER LOS ANGELES, INC. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, Accept the subject Agreement Extension and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract 161 t 6 were approved by the City Council on March 19, 2003. The developer, KB Home Greater Los Angeles, Inc. is requesting improvement of another 12~month extension on said improvement agreement. KB Home requests an extension in order to complete the offsite improvements. These improvements include completion of undergrounding the dry utilities on Banyan Street and East Avenue, completion of the landscaping within the right-of-way areas on East Avenue and Banyan Street, completion of the community horse trails and the construction of stone pilasters along the block walls adjacent to Banyan Street. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's office Respectfully submitted, Williar~J. O'Neil City Engineer Attachments April 12, 2004 Mr. Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer Engineering Division City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: Extension of Improvement Agreement for Tract 16116 Dear Mr. James: KB Home reque, sts an extensio.n of the Improvement Agreement for Tract 16116. The request ~s necessary m order to complete the remaining offsite improvements. These improvements include completion of undergrounding the dry utilities on Banyan Street and East Avenue, completion of the landscaping within the ROW areas on East Avenue and Banyan Street, completion of the community horse trails and the construction of stone pilasters along the block walls adjacent to Banyan Street at the request of Planning. Also, the last phases of homes are still under construction so the R & R work and the street capping can not be completed until this construction is close to completion. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. If you have any questions, please contact me at (909) 802-1133. Sincerely yours KB HOME Greater Los Angeles Inc. Project Manager K8 HOME GREATER LOS ANGELES INC, 801 CORPORATE CENTER DRIVE SUITE 20I POMONA, CA 9]768 TEL 909 802 1277 TOLL FREE 800 828 0314 FAX 909 802 1128 KRHOME.COM RESOLUTION NO. ~)/'//'- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 16116 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on April 21, 2004, by KB Home Greater Los Angeles, Inc., as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located at the southwest corner of Banyan Street and East Avenue; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Tract 16116; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto TH C T Y O F RANCHO C U CA M O N GA Staff Report DATE: April 21, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT - DRC2001-00534 - CABOT INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES, L.P. - A request to amend the circulation within the Industrial Park Development District, Subarea 6, to eliminate Center Avenue from 6m Street south to Trademark Parkway. Submitted by Cabot Industrial Properties, L.P., - APN'S: 209-072-06, -1 I, -16, -17 and - 35. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council, through the approval process for said Development Code amendment, approve the elimination of Center Avenue, from 6th street south to Trademark Parkway. The developer will be required to acquire right-of-way for and construct a cul-de-sac terminus for Trademark Parkway and the City to vacate said portion of Center Avenue that is no longer needed. On September 26, 2001, the Planning Commission recommended approval of Development Code Amendment No. DRC2001-00534 and recommended adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration, which requires the Staff or an appropriate specialist monitor and approve specific mitigation activities prior to the development continuing. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Description of Project: Environmental Assessment and Development Review 0041 - A Master Plan Corporate Park - The proposed project is for the construction of a warehouse with 800,370 square feet for warehousing uses and approximately 54,000 square feet for light industrial uses on 40.16 acres of vacant land located on the south side of 6th Street, approximately 490' west of Haven Avenue. The proposed warehouse will be used for storage and distribution. Site development will occur in one phase. Use of the warehouse will be consistent with permitted uses set forth in the City of Rancho Cucamonga Industrial Area Specific Plan, Subarea 6, General Industrial. The project will require the Amendments to the Development Code, Chapter 17.30 Industrial Area Districts, to eliminate the proposed continuation of Center Avenue from 6th Street south to Trademark Parkway. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2001-00534 - CABOT INDUSTRIALPROPERTIES, L.P. April 21, 2004 Page 2 B. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The 40.16-acm site is located on the south side of 6th Street between Haven and Hermosa Avenues. It is bounded on the north and south by vacant lands. The site is bordered on the west by Deer Creek Flood Control Channel and on the east by a vocational, technical education facility currently under construction. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Part I of the Initial Study was completed by the applicant, and Staff completed Part II. Staff identified potential impacts related to traffic congestion. A Congestion Management Program/Traffic Impact Analysis (CMPFFIA) was prepared to determine whether the project would cause increase in vehicle trips or traffic congestion in excess of projections for the adopted land use. The CMP/TIA concluded that the project would not result in traffic congestion at the study intersections. On September 26, 2001, the Planning Commission further found that the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Based upon these and other findings, the Plan~ing Commission recommended approval of Development Code Amendment DRC2001-00534. BACKGROUND AND CONCLUSION: A Traffic Impact Analysis (dated January 2001) was prepared by Kimley-Hom Associates, Inc. to determine potential circulation impacts resulting from the elimination of Center Avenue. The analysis considered impacts of the proposed project on existing conditions, as well as on conditions in the year 2020 at the build-out of the General Plan levels of service for existing conditions, existing plus project. Year 2020 and Year 2020thplus project conditions for the following intersections: Hermosa Avenue/4th Street, Hermosa Avenue/6 Street, Haven Avenue/4th Street and Haven Avenue/6t~ Street. The Traffic Impact Analysis concluded that the project would not create any significant impacts at any of the previously listed intersections. On September 26, 2001, the Planning Commission per Resolution No. 01-91 determined that the said Development Code Amendment is in accord with the General Plan, the objections of the Development Code and the purposes of the Industrial Park District. Staff did not proceed with City Council action in 2001 because the developer put his project on hold. He is now in plan check with his building and public improvements. CORRESPONDENCE: These items have been advertised as a public heating in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper. The property was posted and notices were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the property side. Notice was also sent to the property owner within 300 feet of the project who had previously submitted a letter to the City dated September 18, 2001 objecting to the elimination of Center Avenue. ¢8' CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2001-00534 - CABOT INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES, L.P. April 21, 2004 Page 3 ACTION: If the City Council concurs with the Planning Commission recommendation and Staff's analysis, and believes the proposed land is preferable to existing Development Code requirements, then it would be appropriate for the City Council to approve Development Code Amendment No. DRC2001~00534 through adoption of the attached resolution and introduction of attached ordinance. Respectfully submitted, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ENGINEERING DIVISION William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:DJ:tch Attachments: Vicinity Map Planning Commission Resolution No. 01-90 Planning Commission Staff Report (September 26, 2001) Planning Commission Minutes (September 26, 2001) Letter: Phillip Homme Resolution Ordinance/with attachment ARROW 6TH STREET 4TH STREET INLAND EMPIRE SAN 0 FR'~FY'- Vicinity Map City of Rancho Cucamonga N RESOLUTION NO. O/'/-/~. '~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT CODE PER DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2001-00534 - AMENDING THE CIRCULATION WITHIN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, SUBAREA 6, TO ELIMINATE CENTER AVENUE FROM 6TM STREET SOUTH TO TRADEMARK PARKWAY AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 209-072-06, -11, -16, -17 AND -35 A. Recitals: 1. Cabot Industrial Properties, L.P., filed an application to amend the Development Code, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Code Amendment is referred to as "the application". 2. On September 26, 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing to initiate an amendment to delete Center Avenue from 6th Street south to Trademark Parkway in the Industrial Park Development District, Subarea 6, and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. On the 26th day of September 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted and concluded a duly noticed public hearing that recommended approval of Development Code Amendment DRC2001-00534 recommending to the City Council that the said Development Code Amendment be approved. 4. A true and correct copy of the proposed Development Code Amendment is included as a part of the attached draft Ordinance. 5. The Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the environmental determination prepared for said project, DRC2001-00534 Development Code Amendment Related Project: DRCDR00-41 - Development Review. 6. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. RESOLUTION NO. DRC2001-00534 - CABOT INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES, L.P., April 21, 2004 Page 2 B. Resolution: NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. This Council hereby specifically finds that the Amendment for "the application" and each and every term and provision contained herein conforms to the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 3. This Council hereby approves the Amendment to the Development Code to permit the elimination of Center Avenue from 6th Street south to Trademark Parkway, as described in "the application" - DRC2001-00534 and as specified in the attached draft Ordinance. 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF Rancho Cucamonga, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2001-00534 TO AMEND THE STREET CIRCULATION WITHIN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, SUBAREA 6, ELIMINATING THE EXTENSION OF CENTER AVENUE FROM 6TM STREET SOUTH TO TRADEMARK PARKWAY BY AMENDING SECTION 17.30.080, FIGURE 17.30.080-H OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA DEVELOPMENT CODE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A. Recitals: 1. On September 26, 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on a request to initiate an application to amend the Development Code to delete Center Avenue from 6th Street south to Trademark Parkway in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 6). The Planning Commission moved to direct staff to process said amendment to the Development Code. 2. Cabot Industrial Properties, L.P., filed an application for Development Code Amendment DRC2001-00534 as described in the title of this Ordinance. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, the subject Development Code Amendment is referred to as "the application". 3. On September 26, 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and issued Resolution No. 01-90, recommending to the City Council that the Development Code Amendment No. DRC2001-00534 be approved. 4. On April 21, 2004, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and issued Resolution No. --- approving the Development Code Amendment DRC2001- 00534. 5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. ORDINANCE NO. DRC2001-00534 - CABOT INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES, L.P., April 21, 2004 Page 2 B. Ordinance: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth'in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing on April 2t, 2004, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and b. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and c. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, s amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application. ORDINANCE NO. DRC2001-00534 - CABOT INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES, L.P., April 21, 2004 Page 3 b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project, which are listed below. Environmental Mitigation: Air Quality 1) The site shall be treated with water a minimum of twice per day, or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM10 emissions during grading. 2) Public roads used for access to the site (Buffalo Avenue and Charles Smith Avenue) shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM10 emissions from the site during such episodes. Emission reduction no quantifiable. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM10 emissions from the site during such episodes. Emissions reduction no quantifiable. 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PMlo emissions. 5) The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-site based on Iow emission factors and high-energy efficiency. The construction contractor shall ensure the construction grading plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. This will result in five percent reductions of ROG, NOx, and PM10 emissions. 6) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 7) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. ORDINANCE NO. DRC2001-00534 - CABOT INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES, L.P., April 21, 2004 Page 4 8) The construction contractor shall use Iow VOC asphalt during the asphalt paving portions of the project. Traffic 1) To mitigate the impacted intersections to LOS D or better, the applicant shall pay traffic impact fees that amount to the project's fair share of roadway improvements as identified by the City Engineer. These include but are not limited to widening roadways to their full width to add additional lanes, re-striping existing roads to add additional lanes, signalizing intersections, or other improvements identified by the City Engineer. Noise 1) The project would add people and traffic to the area and generally increase ambient noise levels since the site is currently vacant. However, the impact is not considered significant as the project is consistent with the Development Code, General Industrial/Industrial Park zoned area with no sensitive receptors in the area. 2) The proposed project is the development of one industrial building with loading areas. The development will remain consistent with surrounding land uses, zoned as General Industrial/Industrial Park. The project development would generate approximately 727 trips/day, creating no significant increase in noise caused by traffic in 'the area, and not predicted to exceed City noise limits. Therefore this impact is considered less than significant. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: in considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study an Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which, wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reported and exhibits, and the information provided fo the City Council during the public hearing, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. ORDINANCE NO. DRC2001-00534 - CABOT INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES, L.P., April 21, 2004 Page 5 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2 and 3 above, this Council hereby approves Development Code Amendment DRC2001-00534 to amend the street cimulation within the Industrial Park Development District, Subarea 6, eliminating the extension of Center Avenue from 6th Street south to Trademark Parkway by amending Figure 17.30.080-H of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code as shown in Exhibit "A" to this Ordinance. 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17. 30.080 FIGURE 17.30.080-H T H E C I T Y O F I~A~ C H 0 CII CAH ON GA DATE: April 21,2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City M~ FROM: Brad Bailer, City Pla~ ~'-~..,~ - SUBJECT: EXHIBIT "D" FOR4~SE DETERMINATION DRC2004-00093 The staff report for Use Determination DRC2004-00093 is missing a page from the Planning Commission minutes noted as Exhibit "D" (see pages 126 and 127 of the agenda packet). The entire exhibit has been reproduced and is attached to this memorandum for your thoughtful consideration. We apologize for the inconvenience this may have caused. BB:Is CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Regular Meeting March 10, 2004 Chairman Macias called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission to order at 7:00 p.m. The meeting was held in the Council Chamber at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Ddve, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Chairman Macias then led in the pledge of allegiance. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT: Richard Fletcher, Rich Macias, Cdstine McPhail, LarryMcNiel, Para Stewart ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Brad Buller, City Planner; Dan Coleman, Principal Planner; Kevin Ennis, Assistant City Attorney; Gall Sanchez, Planning Commission Secretary; Joe Stofa, Associate Planner; Emily Wimer, Assistant Planner ANNOUNCEMENTS Brad Buller, City Planner, gave a bdef ove~iew of the meeting ~rmat and public headng process. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion: Moved by Fletcher, seconded by McNiel, carded 4-0-0-1, to approve the minutes of February 11, 2004. Motion: Moved by Stewart, seconded by McNiel, carded 5-0, to approve the minutes of the Adjourned Meeting of February 25, 2004. DIRECTOR'S REPORTS A. USE DETERMINATION DRC2004-00093 - STEVE KNECHT - A request to determine that a dog breeding establishment with outside runs is similar to an Animal Care Facility within the Very Low Residential District. Dan Coleman, Senior Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman Macias invited public comments. Steve Knecht, 10158 Sun Valley, Rancho Cucamonga, stated his property is a little over an acre and the closest house to the dog runs is approximately 200 feet away. He presented notes that had been signed by the neighbors on either side indicating they have not experienced problems with the dogs. He indicated they have been breeding and showing dogs for about 23 years and a lot of the dogs they have are retired show dogs and they are part of their family. He stated they take the dogs for walks all the time. He said he considers his operation an animal care facility because they always have a standard open option to anyone who buys a dog from them that they will take back the dog at any point because they want to be sure they go to good homes. He said it was his understanding that no one in the City had ever applied for a kennel license. He stated a complaint was made to the County and that started the investigation and the complaint was right after the fires. He thought it might have come from one of the County workers behind his property. He did not think there had been any complaints to the City about their operation. He said he built the kennels to be very secure including fencing over the top because he wants to protect the dogs from predators, as they back up to the mountains. He said he was more than willing to acquire a business license and register all the dogs. Commissioner Fletcher asked if the picture on page ^16 of the staff report depicts a neighbor's house. Mr. Knecht stated that was the closest house, and it is over 200 feet. Paul Moore, 13054 23rd Street, Rancho Cucamonga, stated he purchased a dog from Mr. Knecht. He said he takes care of the dogs whenever the Knechts are out of town. He said the dogs are all caged and well taken care of. He indicated the dogs are very tame. He hoped the operation would be allowed to continue. There were no further public comments. Commissioner McNiel felt that this area would be as near to ideal in a residential area for this kind of use if it were permitted. He believed the Municipal Code does not allow the use because of the size of the parcel being less than 2% acres. He said that although the location may seem good, it can not exist by law. Commissioner Stewart stated that three elements of facts or findings that are necessary: 1) that it meets the intent of the General Plan and the District, 2) that it meets the goals and objectives of the General Plan, and 3) is it a similar use as to what is allowed in the District. She did not feel the application meets those findings. She believed it might have met the findings years ago before the land was developed into acre or ~ acre residential lots. She did not feel it is a compatible land use because the land is already developed. She stated it was disconcerting that tonight's decision would apply to the entire distdct at large. She felt that the proposed use was problematic. She said that to determine this use to be possible with a conditional use permit would mean others could also have a kennel or an animal shelter facility in their back yard. She feared that if a conditional use permit were granted, the Commission would in time be asked to revoke the permit in the future since there had already been an anonymous complaint. Commissioner McPhail concurred. She noted the lot is smaller than the 2% acre size that could be considered. Commissioner Fletcher agreed. He said he does not like to impose on what individuals can do on their own property, but he stated the Commission must look at what is compatible for the rest of the residents. He believed the use is a dog kennel, rather than an animal care facility and any other finding would be a tweaking of the Code to fit one particular circumstance. He said if the Commission were to make a favorable determination, it would mean any other similar size lot could have a similar operation. He noted it was not a question of whether the applicant has a good operation and raises healthy dogs, but is more a use determination. Chairman Macias felt staff did a good job with a straightforward explanation and the Commissioners had addressed the issues with respect to purpose and intent. He noted the Use Determination is for an entire distdct and it is not a site-specific issue. He believed the Commission's role is to be concerned about the preservation of the spidt, purpose, and intent of what the General Plan has in it. Planning Commission Minutes -2- March 10, 2004 · Motion: Moved by McNiel, seconded by Fletcher, to adopt the resolution denying Use Determination DRC2004-00093. Motion carded by the following vote: AYES: FLETCHER, MACIAS, McNIEL, McPHAIL, STEWART NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE - carded Brad Buller, City Planner, requested that the City Attorney explain the options available to the applicant. Kevin Ennis, Assistant City Attorney, explained that the Commission approved a resolution denying the Use Determination and the applicant could appeal the decision to the City Council. Mr. Knecht asked if there was a way to bdng the matter before the Planning Commission as a site- specific request. Mr. Bullet explained that the Commission made a determination this evening that the proposed use does not fit the definition or the lot size or the other factors for the Very Low Residential area. He said that means there is no provision for an applicant to even ask for a conditional use permit for that use in that area. Mr. Ennis said the action was a determination on the ability to apply for a conditional use permit and because a use determination had been made by the Commission indicating this is not a use that would be permitted in this particular zone; then the available option would be to appeal the determination, rather than to apply for a conditional use permit. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. COMMISSION BUSINESS B. DESIGN AWARDS Dan Coleman, Principal Planner, distributed photographs of nominated projects completed in 2003. He commented that several months ago, the Commission determined winners for projects completed in 2002 and decided it would be best to combine those awards with the winners for projects completed in 2003. It was the consensus of the Commission that the votes would be turned in to staff to tally. ADJOURNMENT Motion: Moved by McNiel, seconded by McPhail, carded 5-0, to adjourn. The Planning Commission adjourned at 7:28 p.m. to a workshop. The workshop adjourned at 8:00 p.m. and those minutes appear separately. Secretary Planning Commission Minutes -3- March 10, 2004 THE CITY OF I~ANCHO CIICAH ONC. A $ R rt DATE: April 21,2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Ruben Warren, Planning Technician SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF USE DETERMINATION DRC2004-00093 - STEVE KNECHT - An appeal of the Planning Commission's decision denying a request that a dog breeding establishment with outside runs is similar to an animal care facility within the Very Low Residential District at 10158 Sun Valley - APN: 1074-081-12 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council deny the appeal, thus upholding Planning Commission Use Determination DRC2004-00093 that dog breeding establishments with outside runs are not similar to an animal care facility within the Very Low (.1-2 dwelling units per acre) residential district. BACKGROUND: The appellant, Steve Knecht, filed a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) application for an Animal Care Facility after being issued a Notice of Violation by the County of San Bernardino-Human Services, Animal Care and Control Services (CSBAC). The appellant has breed 10 dogs typically producing 1-2 lifters per year at his residence in the neighborhood generally know as "The Woods." The dog facilities at his residence include two barns (8 feet x 12 feet) and six dog runs (50 feet x 4 feet). As the City Planner does not support this use for the location he asked for a Use Determination by the Planning Commission. On March 10, 2004, the Planning Commission determined the use in question is not of a similar intensity to an Animal Care Facility, which is conditionally permitted in the Very Low Residential District. The Commission's decision was timely appealed by Mr. Knecht. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: Animal Requlations, Residential Districts Development Code Table 17.08.030-E -A maximum number of 3 dogs on any site within any district is allowed. Young animals born to a permitted animal may be kept until weaned or for 4 months. Animal Care Facility Defined Development Code Section 17.02.140-C - "A use providing grooming, housing, medical care, or other services to animals including veterinary services, animal hospitals, overnight or short-term boarding ancillary to veterinary care, indoor or outdoor kennels, grooming and similar services." CiTY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2004-00093 - STEVE KNECHT April 21,2004 Page 2 Use Requlations for Residential Districts Development Code Table 17.08.030 - An animal care facility is conditionally permitted in the Very Iow Residential District. Kennel is not listed in the residential use regulation table. Kennel Defined Development Code Section 17.02.140-C -"Any lot or premises on which five or more dogs over four months old are kept for commercial boarding, breeding or training." Special Use Regulations/Agricultural Uses Development Code Section 17.08.030-E - Prior to development on lots of 2.5 acres or more dog kennels, dog training schools, small animal shelters, and dog breeding establishments with outside runs are conditionally permitted. Use Determination Development Code Section 17.02.040 - The Planning Commission shall determine whether a use not specifically listed as permitted, secondary, accessory, or temporary use in any district shall be deemed a permitted use or conditional use in one or more districts on the basis of similarity to uses specifically listed. The procedure is not an amendment procedure but rather a means for adding new uses to the list of permitted or conditioned uses. The Planning Commission decision may be appealed to the City Council. ANALYSIS: The intent of zoning regulations derived from the City General Plan and Development Code include protection of public health, safety, morals, comfort, convenience, and welfare for the physical, social, and economic stability of land uses. The Development Code also dictates comprehensive and orderly land use and resource planning. Potential odor and noise concerns surface when analyzing long-term impacts of dog breeding or kennel facilities in residential districts. Mr. Knecht's appeal (Exhibit "A") gives no reason why he believes the Commission's decision is wrong, nor does his appeal provide any new information for the Council to consider. City Planner BB:RW/Is Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Appellant's Letter of Appeal dated March 22, 2004 Exhibit "B" - Planning Commission Staff Report dated March 10, 2004 Exhibit "C"- Planning Commission Resolution 04-30 Exhibit "D"- Planning Commission Minutes dated March 10, 2004 Draft Resolution to Deny Appeal for Use Determination DRC2004-00093 /0/ March 22, 2004 " ~ ~:~ To: City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga ' 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-0807 CITY OF RANCHO Gu~,, ....... CITY CLERK Re: USE, DE,TERMiNATION DRC2004-00093 To Whom It May Concern: Please allow this document to serve as notification that I wish to appeal the decision of the City Planning Commission from the meeting held March 10, 2004. Thank you, Steve Knecht Exhibit "A" /02. T H ~ C I T Y OF ~ANCHO CIJCA~IONGA SlaffReport DATE: March 10, 2004 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Marina Lounsbury, Planning Aide SUBJECT: USE DETERMINATION DRC2004-00093 - STEVE KNECHT - A request to determine that a dog breeding establishment with outside runs is similar to an animal care facility within the Very Low Residential District. BACKGROUND: The applicant, Steve Knecht, recently applied for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) after being issued a Notice of Violation by the County of San Bernardino-Human Services, Animal Care and Control Services (CSBAC). The violation states that the applicant has more than five dogs on the property without a kennel permit, and either needs to reduce the number of dogs or obtain a kennel permit. The CSBAC officer was at the subject site because of an anonymous complaint call. The applicant was asked to comply within 30 days from the original date of violation. The applicant asked CSBCA for an extension while applying for the Conditional Use Permit. The applicant has lived at this location for approximately four years, and has developed a kennel with six outdoor runs (five are occupied by dogs and one by chickens), and two barns connected by a breezeway to accommodate the dogs. He has ten dogs in five outdoor runs in the backyard. According to the applicant, he breeds dogs to produce one to two litters a year. Prospective buyers come to his home and all pups are sold. The applicant does not have a City Business License or a Home Occupation Permit, and none of the dogs are registered with the San Bernardino County Animal Care and Control Services. The City Planner was notified of a Conditional Use Permit application, for a dog-breeding establishment within the Very Low (.1-2 dwelling units per acre) Residential District area. Because the City Planner does not support this use for that location, he asked for a Use Determination by the Planning Commission. Attached is a letter from the applicant explaining his dog breeding business and background (Exhibit "A"). The applicant wants the City to allow him ten dogs on his property, with outside dog runs, and to continue to have a dog-breeding establishment at his residence, producing one to two litters a year, with the pups remaining on-site until sold. USE DETERMINATION PROCEDURE: A Use Determination is not property specific, rather it applies to all properties within the same zone; therefore, the location, size, and orientation of the applicant's property are not relevant. If the Planning Commission determines that the use should be classified as an Animal Care Facility, then said use would be conditionally permitted on any property within the Very Low (.1-2 dwelling units per acre) Residential District. Exhibit "B" PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT USE DETERMINATION - STEVE KNECHT - DRC2004-00093 March 10, 2004 Page 2 The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, Title 17, Development Code, Section 17.02.040 states: "In order to ensure that the Development Code regulations will permit all similar uses in each district, the Planning Commission, upon its own initiative or upon wdtten request, shall determine whether a use not specifically listed as permitted, seC°ndary, accessory, or temporary use in any district shall be deemed a permitted use or Conditional use in one or more districts on the basis of similarity to uses specifically listed. The procedures of this section shall not be substituted for the amendment procedure as a means of adding new uses to the list of permitted or conditional uses. The City Planner shall compare the proposed use characteristics with the General Plan goals and objectives, as well as the purposes of each of the use districts and may determine if the proposed use should be a permitted or Conditional use in any of the districts and shall make a report of his findings to the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission shall base its decision upon meeting the following findings: 1. The use in question is of a similar intensity to other permitted or conditionally permitted uses in the same district. 2. The use in question meets the purpose and intent of the distdct in which it is proposed. 3. The use in question meets and conforms to the applicable goals and objectives of the General Plan." ANALYSIS: A. Animal Care Facility Defined: The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, Title 17, Development Code Section 17.02.140 defines Animal Care Facility as: "A use providing grooming, housing, medical care, or other services to animals, including veterinary services, animal hospitals, overnight or short-term boarding ancillary to veterinary care, indoor or outdoor kennels, grooming, and similar services." Further clarification is found in the definition of a "kennel": "Any lot or premises on which five or more dogs, which are four months old are kept for commercial boarding, breeding, and training." B. Purpose of the Very Low (.1-2 dwellinq units per acre) Residential District: The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, Title 17, Development Code Section 17.08.020.A states: "This distdct is intended as an area for very Iow density single-family residential use, with a minimum lot size of 20,000 square feet and a maximum residential density of up to two units per gross acre." Attached is a list of secondary uses that are permitted or may be conditionally permitted in the Very Low (.1-2 dwelling units per acre) Residential District. The intent that the primary use shall be single-family homes, is further explained by Section 17.08.030.E., which states that the following is a permitted use: "Prior to development, the following agricultural uses are either permitted or conditionally permitted on lots of 2.5 acres or more: Raising, grazing, breeding, boarding, or training of large or small animals, except concentrated lot feeding and Commercial poultry and rabbit raising enterprises, subject to the following: Cats and dogs shall be limited to the keeping of no more than four cats and/or four dogs, over four months of age." Later, this section indicates that the following use may be allowed subject to a Conditional Use Permit: "Dog PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT USE DETERMINATION - STEVE KNECHT - DRC2004-00093 March 10, 2004 Page 3 kennels, dog training schools, small animal shelters, and dog breeding establishments with outside runs." Clearly, the intent is that dog breeding is an agricultural use more appropriate on larger lots before development of land to its highest and best use (single- family residential). Nevertheless, as discussed earlier in this report, Animal Care Facility does include kennels. After development, Table 17.08.030 E - Animal Regulations, Residential Districts, states that the maximum number of dogs allowed on any site, regardless of lot size, is three, excluding pups up to four months old. C. Land Use Compatibility: The basic intent of zoning regulations is to separate incompatible uses in order "to protect the public health, safety, morals, comfort, conveniences, and welfare," and to implement the goals of the General Plan. Implicit in this intent is the concept of separation of land uses of marked differences in intensity. The General Plan states: "Our general policy direction has been and continues to be the protection of our single-family residential neighborhoods from development densities and intensities that would significantly diminish the quality of these neighborhoods." Although this report is not addressing a specific Conditional Use Permit request, it is important, to note that the most critical issues to assure neighborhood compatibility of a kennel, including a commercial dog breeding operation, are noise and odor. The City regulation is a maximum of three dogs on any residential lot, regardless of size. The applicant has ten dogs which, when barking, can be expected to be louder than three dogs. Likewise, the greater the number of dogs, the greater the potential for odors from feces and urine. If the Commission determines that Animal Care Facility includes commercial dog breeding, then staff will begin processing the applicant's Conditional Use Permit and address specific impacts and mitigations. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Commission determine that a dog breeding business with outside dog runs is not similar to an Animal Care Facility by adopting the attached Resolution of Denial. Respectfully submitted, City Planner BB:ML/jm Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Applicant's letter received January 29, 2004 Exhibit "B" - Site Plan of residence and location of dog runs Exhibit "C" - Copy of Assessor's Map - Site location and surrounding area Exhibit "D" - Development Code Land Use Matrix Exhibit "E" - Development Code Special Land Use Regulations Exhibit "F" - Notice of Violation, issued by CSBAC Exhibit "G" - GIS Site Plan of Surrounding Area Exhibit "H" - Site Photographs Draft Resolution of Denial for Use Determination DRC2004-00093 10158 Sun Valley Drive Alta Loma, CA 91737 (909) 980 4713 (home) (310) 332-0919 (work) smknecht@aol.com knechst @ voughtaircraft.com City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Dept 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91730 To whom it concerns: The attached package is being submitted to request a conditional use permit at our property located at 10158 Sun Valley Drive in Ranch Cucamonga. We are submitting this request due to a violation notice from the county health dept.. They are requiring that we obtain a permit for more than 4 dogs or reduce the number of dogs we own. There are no complaints on file about our dogs as far as we know. My wife and I have been breeding and showing Golden Retrievers for more than 23 years. We currently have 10 dogs that range from 11 years old to less than 1 year old. All of our dogs are AKC registered and exhibit all the good traits of the breed such as calm temperament and ease of training. We only breed the highest quality dogs and produce pups that will fit well in a family setting. Typically we have one to two litters per year and always have homes for the pups before they are 8 weeks old. Our property is situated in the "Woods" of Alta Loma and the lot size is 1 1/8 acres The standard lot spacing in this neighborhood is ~/2 acre with many larger lots.' Our lot is fully fenced with six foot high chain link fence on all sides. I have built two small barns - 8 feet x 12 feet to accommodate the dogs. Additionally there are 6 dog runs that are 50 feet long and four feet wide attached to the barns. These runs are 6 foot high chain link fence topped with metal roofs attached to the barns and fencing. The runs also have underground close mesh wire to prevent predators from entering the areas and to positively ensure security for our animals. Large eucalyptus trees provide shade to a big portion of the runs in addition to the metal roofing. Them are two water faucets at the end of the runs as well as overhead lights for added security and utility. The area is cleaned and maintained on a daily basis and no animal waste is allowed to accumulate. This helps ensure the health of our dogs and assures that there is absolutely no waste runoff. The above noted area is in the far north portion of the property as shown on the attached sketches. As can be seen, the closest neighbors are a long distance from the dog runs. The subject area is bordered on the back side by a bridle path and the San Bemardino mountains. In addition, we can provide references as needed about our animals and the veracity of the above statements. Your expeditious review and approval of this request is sincerely appreciated. Sincerely, IO7 FI ~1 DES'CRIPTION ' CREATIV[ BUILDER R~ancho Cucarnonga Development Code Section 17.08.030 Table 17.08.030- Use Regulations for Residential Districts' USE VL L LM M MH H A.' Residential Uses 1. Single-Family Detached P P · P P* · 2. Single-Family Attached (du-, tri- and p p p p four-plex) 3. Multiple Family Dwellings P* P P P 4. Mobile Home Parks C C C C C · C B. Other Uses · ~ 1. Animal Care Facility C 2. Cemetery C C C C C C 3. Chumh C C C C C C 4. Club, Lodge, Fraternity & Sorority C C C C C 5. College or University C C C C C C :' 6. Convalescent Center C C C C 7. Public Facility' C C C C C C 8. Day Care Facility Accessory - 6 or less P P P P P P Non-Accessory - 7 or more C C C C C C 9. Fire & Police Station C C C C C C 10. Hospital C C C C 11. Outdoor Recreation Facility C C C C C C (non-cornrnemial) 12. Public Park and Playground P P P P P P ~3. Residential Care FacJlity Accessory - 6 or less P P P P P P Non-Accessory - 7 or more C C C C 14. Schools, Private & Parochial C C C C C C 15. Stable, Commercial C j 16. Stable, Private P R_aancho Cucar~onga Development Code Section 17.08.030 USE VL L LM M MH H 17. Utility or Service Facility C C C C C C 18. Recreational Vehicle Storage or C C C C C Mini-Storage for public use C. A._ccessory Uses 1. Accessory Structure P P P P P P 2. Antenna P P P P P ' P 3. Caretaker's Residence C C C C C C 4. Guest House P P P 5. Home Occupation P P P P P P 6. Lodging Unit P P P 7. Other Accessory Uses P P P P P P 8. Private Garage P P P P P P 9. Private Swimming Pool P P P P P P 10. Second Dwelling Unit (including p p p elder cottage) 11. Feed & Tack Store (if accessory to C commercial stable) 12. Dormitory (if accessory to college or C C C C C C school) 13, Uses in Historic Structures C C C C C C D. 1. Temporary Uses as prescribed in Section 17.04;070 and subject to P P P P P P those provisions -- 2. Temporarytrailersfor use in conjunction with religious and C C C C C C agricultural uses for a specified interim period. .. , ,..~_ ~.~;.~.~, .... ;, ,,~h~~me~nda~nly. Note: Symbol * indicates pert ~J p = Permitted Use C = Conditional Use Permit required (~ S~cial Use Re.qulations 1. Agricultural Uses. Prior to development, the following agricultural uses are either permitted or conditionally permitted on lots of 2.5 acres or more: 47.08.4 l// Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.08.030 a. Permitted Uses: (1) Farms for orchards, trees, field crops, truck gardening, flowering gardening, and other similar enterprises carried on in the general field of agriculture. (2) Raising, grazing, breeding, boarding or training of large or small animals: except concentrated lot feeding and commercial poultry and rabbit raising enterprises, subject to the following: (a) Cats and dogs shall be limited to the keeping of no more than four cats and/or four dogs, over four months of age. (b) Small livestock are allowed with the number of goats, sheep, and similar animals limited to 12 per acre of total gross area, with no more than one male goat. (c) Cattle and heroes, including calves and colts over six months of age, with a maximum number of four animals per acre of total gross area. (d) Combinations of the above animals provided the total density on any given pamel shall not exceed that herein specified. (e) In no event shall there be any limit to the permissible number of sheep which may be grazed per acre, where such grazing operation is conducted on fields for the purpose of cleaning up unharvested crops, stubble, volunteer, er wild growth and further, where such grazing operation is not conducted for more than four weeks in any six-month period. (3) Aviary shall be limited to 50 birds per acre. (4) An apiary is permitted provided that all hives or boxes housing bees shall be placed at least 400 feet from any street, road, highway, public school, park, property boundary, or from any dwelling or place of human habitation other than that occupied by the owner or caretaker of the apiary. Additionally, a water source shall be provided on-site. (5) Retail sale of products raised on property excluding retail nursery and sale ~ of animals for commercial purposes. b. Conditional Use Permit required: (1) Wholesale distributor and processor of nursery-plant stock. Retail nursery where incidental and contiguous to propagation of nursery stock and/or wholesale distributor. Outdoor storage and display is prohibited except for nursery-plant stock. Dog schools, small animal shelters, and dog breeding kennels, dog training establishments with outside runs. (3) The raising of chinchilla, nutria, hamsters, guinea pigs, cavy, and similar small animals. Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.08.030 (4) Frog farms. (5) Worm farms. 2. Animals. Keeping of animal's accessory to residential use shall be limited as follows: a. Number of Animals. The number of animals kept on any site shall not exceed the maximum number and combination of animals allowable as set forth in Table 17.08.030-E. For example, the following combination of animals would be permitted in the Very Low District: two horses, one pony, one cow, four goats, etc. b. Location of Animals. All animals, excluding household pets, shall be kept a minimum distance of 70 feet from any adjacent dwelling, school, hospital or church located on any adjoining site. The location of corrals, fenced enclosures, barns, stables or other enclosures used to confine horses shall conform to this requirement. c. Deed Restrictions. New subdivision Conditions, Covenants and Restrictions shall not prohibit the keeping of equine animals, where district requirements for the keeping of said animals have been met. Individual lot owners shall have the option of keeping equine animals without the necessity of appealing to boards of directors or homeowner's associations for amendments to CC&R's. A copy of the CC&R's for single-family subdivisions shall be reviewed and approved by the City prior to final map recordation. Except as provided herein above, this section shall not be construed to supersede animal regulations contained in the Conditions, Covenants, and Restrictions of any site or dwelling unit. However, in no case shall private deed restrictions permit animals or numbers of animals beyond those allowable in this section. d. Exotic or Wild Animals. Keeping of exotic or wild animals shall be permitted subject to issuance of a Conditional Use Permit. e. Offspring. Young animals born to a permitted animal kept on the site may be kept until such animals are weaned (cats and dogs - 4 months; large animals - 6 months; horses - 12 months). Table 17,08,030-E -Animal Regulations, Residential Districts Minimum Site Maximum Allowable Area Per Number Of Residential Type of Animal Animal(a) Animals On Required An}/Site® District 1. Each horse, mule, donkey or pony® 10,000 6. VL, L® 2. Each large animal other than a horse, 20,000 3 VL, L® pony, mule, or donkey 3. Each smallanimal 5,000 6 All 4. Each 5 birds or rodents® 5,000® 25® All 5. Each cat None 3 All ~,~ 6. Each dog None 3 All ~_.,~,,~ ounty of San Bernardino - Human Se~ices System ~ Depa~ment of Public Health ~ ~~ ~ ~.~L C~.E ~.O CO.~.O~ S~.V~C~S 606 East Mill Street ~_ ~ ~ sa~~oo3 ~F VIOLATION O~te Name ~ ~~ _Ci~ ~ Address ~'~ I'~ ~ ~Operator ~' ~, Kind of Pla~ ~ ~ ~~ - PREMISES/ANIMAL(S) AT ~ ~ ~~ Re: - ~'re~Y notified that you are in violation of ~A~~ ~ ~ NATUREOFVIO~TION--~~ J~-~-~ h , reb requested to ~C ' ' -- You are he Y ,,e~ co~,'~ w,,,,h'~ ~q~e~t w,t,,. _ ~~ ~n~ ~ ~ ~ . ~0~. ,o ~vo,d,~'e~ ~c,,o.. be directed to: Questions relative to this violation should RESOLUTION NO. 04-30 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING USE DETERMINATION DRC2004-00093, BY DETERMINING THAT DOG BREEDING ESTABLISHMENTS WITH OUTSIDE RUNS ARE NOT SIMILAR TO AN ANIMAL CARE FACILITY WITHIN THE VERY LOW (.1-2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. .Recitals. 1. Steve Knecht filed an application for Use Determination DRC2004-00093, for a dog- breeding kennel for ten dogs he has been operating for four years, located at 10158 Sun Valley Ddve. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Use Determination request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 10th day of March 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the Use Determination and concluded said meeting on that date. , 3. All legal prerequisites pdor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. The Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting on March 10, 2004, including written and oral staff reports, the Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The use in question is not of a similar intensity to other permitted or conditionally permitted uses in the same district. The purpose and intent of the Development Code, stated ill part in Section 17.02.010.C. is "to protect the public health, safety, morals, comfort, conveniences, and welfare." The application applies to property at 10158 Sun Valley Drive in the Very Low (.1-2 dwelling units per acre) Residential District. The Development Code Section 17.08.020.A, states that: 'q'his distdct is intended as an area for very Iow density single-family residential use, with a minimum lot size of 20,000 square feet,, and a maximum residential density of up to two units per gross acre." b. The Development Code Table 17.08.030, lists the secondary permitted and conditionally permitted uses that may be allowed in the Very Low (.1-2 dwelling units per acre) Residential District, and in said Table, "Kennel," "dog kennel" or "dog-breeding kennel" is not listed. Rather, the applicant's dog-breeding kennel is specifically listed as an agricultural use that should only be permitted prior to development. Development Code Section 17.08.030.E., states that the following is a permitted use: "Prior to development, the following agricultural uses are either permitted or conditionally permitted on lots of 2.5 acres or more: Raising, grazing, breeding, boarding, or training of large or small animals, except concentrated lot feeding and commercial Exhibit "C" PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-30 USE DETERMINATION DRC2004-00093 - STEVE KNECHT March 10, 2004 Page 2 poultry and rabbit raising enterprises, subject to the following: Cats and dogs shall be limited to the keeping of no more than four cats and/or four dogs, over four months of age." Later, this same section indicates that the following use may be allowed subject to a Conditional Use Permit: "Dog kennels, dog training schools, small animal shelters, and dog breeding establishmentS with outside runs." Therefore, the intent is that dog breeding is an agricultural use more appropriate on lots of 2.5 acres or larger before development of land to its highest and best use (i.e., single-family residential). The proposed site for the use is on a lot smaller than 2.5 acres and already developed with a single-family residence; therefore the property does not qualify to have agricultural uses, such as dog breeding facilities. Therefore, this use is not allowed on the subject property. c. The use in question does not meet the purpose and the intent of the district in which it is proposed. The application applies to property at 10158 Sun Valley Drive within the Very Low (.1-2 dwelling units 'per acre) Residential District. The intent is that the primary use shall be single-family homes according to Development Code Section 17.08.020.A, which states: 'q'his district is intended as an area for very Iow density single-family residential use, with a minimum lot size of 20,000 square feet, and a maximum residential density of up to two units 'per gross acre." d. The use in question does not meet and conform to the applicable goals and objectives of the General Plan. The General Plan states: "Our general policy direction has been and continues to be the protection of our single-family residential neighborhoods from development densities and intensities that would significantly diminish the quality of these neighborhoods." The · City regulation is a maximum of three dogs on any residential lot, regardless of size. The applicant has ten dogs which, when barking, can be reasonably expected to be louder than three dogs. 3. Based upon. substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting on March 10, 2004, including written and oral staff reports, the Commission hereby specifically finds and concludes as follows: a. The application contemplates the keeping and breeding of dogs, currently 10 in number, which exceeds the number of dogs currently permitted or conditionally permitted in the same district. b. The use is in conflict with the uses cun'ently permitted in the Very Low Residential District and is only noted as an agricultural use permitted prior to development on lots of 2.5 acres or more. c. The use is in conflict with the primary intent of the Very Low Residential District, which is "for very Iow density single-family residential use." d. The use does not conform to the applicable goals and objectives of the General plan because of the number of dogs being kept and the potential for excessive noise, and possible odor concerns resulting from keeping this number of dogs. 4. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above referenced meeting and upon specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1,2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby determines that the keeping and breeding of dogs in the Very Low Residential District is not similar to an Animal Care Facility, is not of a similar intensity to other permitted or conditionally permitted uses in the same district, does not meet the purpose or intent of the Very Low Residential District, and does not conform to the goals and objectives of the General Plan. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-30 USE DETERMINATION DRC2004-00093- STEVE KNECHT March 10, 2004 Page 3 5. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED ;I'HIS 10TH DAY OF MARCH 2004. pLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Rich Macias, Chairman ATTE~ I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do h~reby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of March 2004, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: coMMISSIONERS: F_-LETCHER, NACIAS, McNIEL, McPHAIL, STEWART NOES: cOMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: cOMMISSIONERS: NONE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Regular Meeting March 10, 2004 Chairman Macias called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Plar~ning Commission to order at 7:00 p.m. The meeting was held in the Council Chamber at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Ddve, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Chairman Macias then led in the pledge of allegiance. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT: Richard Fletch~;', Rich Macias, Cdstine McPhail, Lamj McNiel, Para Stewart ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Brad Buller, City Planner;, Dan Coleman, Principal Planner;, Kevin Ennis, Assistant City Attorney; Gall Sanchez, Planning Commission Secretary; Joe Stofa, Associate Planner;, Emily Wimer, Assistant Planner ANNOUNCEMENTS Brad Buller, City Planner, gave a bdef overview of the meeting format and public headng process. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion: Moved by Fletcher, seconded by McNiel, carded 4-0-0-1, to approve the minutes of February 11, 2004. Motion: Moved by Stewart, seconded by McNiel, carried 5-0, to approve the minutes of the Adjourned Meeting of February 25, 2004. DIRECTOR'S REPORTS A. USE DETERMINATION DRC2004-00093 - STEVE KNECH'~ - A request to determine that a dog breeding establishment with outside runs is similar to an Animal Care Facility within the Very Low Residential District. Dan Coleman, Senior Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman Macias invited public comments. Steve Knecht, 10158 Sun Valley, Rancho Cucamonga, stated his property is a little over an acre and the closest house to the dog runs is approximately 200 feet away. He presented notes that had been signed by the neighbors on either side indicating they have not experienced problems with the dogs. He indicated they have been breeding and showing dogs for about 23 years and a lot of the dogs they have are retired show dogs and they are part of their family. He stated they take the dogs for walks all the time. He said he considers his operation an animal care facility because they always Exhibit y I Z Motion: Moved by McNiel, seconded by Fletcher, to adopt the resolution denying Use Determinati°n DRC2004-00093. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: FLETCHER, MAClAS, McNIEL, McPHAIL, STEWART NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE - carded Brad Buller, City Planner, requested that the City Attomey explain the options available to the applicant. Kevin Ennis, Assistant City Attomey, explained that the Commission approved a resolution denying the Use Determination and the applicant could appeal the decision to the City Council. Mr. Knecht asked if there was a way to bdng the matter before the Planning CoMmission as a site- specific request. Mr. Buller explained that the commission made a determination this.evening that the proposed use does not fit the definition or the lot size or the other factors for the Very Low Residential area. He said that means them is no provision for an applicant to even ask for a conditional use permit for that use in that area. Mr. Ennis said the action was a determination on the ability to apply for a conditional use permit and because a use determination had been made by the Commission indicating this is not a use that would be permitted' in this particular zone; then the available option would be to appeal the determination, rather than to apply for a conditional use permit. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. COMMISSION BUSINESS B. DESIGN AWARDS Dan coleman, Principal Planner, distributed photographs of nominated projects completed in 2003. He commented that several months ago, the commission determined winners for projects completed in 2002 and decided it would be best to combine those awards with the winners for projects completed in 2003. It was the consensus of the Commission that the votes would be turned in to staff to tally. ADJOURNMENT Motion: Moved by McNiel, seconded by McPhail, carded 5-0, to adjourn. The Planning Commission adjourned at 7:28 p.m. to a workshop. The workshop adjourned at 8:00 p.m. and those minutes appear separately. Secretary Planning Commission Minutes -3- March 10, 2004 RESOLUTION NO. 0 -12 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, UPHOLDING THE ACTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND DENYING THE APPEAL OF USE DETERMINATION DRC2004-00093, BY DETERMINING THAT DOG BREEDING ESTABLISHMENTS WITH OUTSIDE RUNS ARE NOT SIMILAR TO AN ANIMAL CARE FACILITY WITHIN THE VERY LOW (.1-2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. Steve Knecht, filed an application for Use Determination DRC2004-00093, for an operating dog-breeding kennel for ten dogs, located at 10158 Sun Valley Drive, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Use Determination request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 10th day of March 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. Following the conclusion of the meeting, the Planning Commission adopted its Resolution No. 04-30 denying the application. 3. The decision represented by Planning Commission Resolution No. 04-30 was timely appealed by Mr. Knecht to this Council. 4. On April 21,2004, the City Council of the City.of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed meeting on the application. 5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing on April 21, 2004, including written and oral staff reports, the minutes of the above-referenced Planning Commission meeting, and the contents of Planning Commission Resolution No. 04-30, and together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located in the Very Low (.1-2 dwelling units per acre) Residential District; and b. The use in question is not of a similar intensity to other permitted or conditionally permitted uses in the same district. The purpose and intent of the Development Code, stated in part in Section 17.02.010.C. is "to protect the public health, safety, morals, comfort, conveniences, and welfare." The Development Code Section 17.08.020.A, states that: "This district is intended as an CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. USE DETERMINATION DRC2004-00093 - STEVE KNECHT April 21,2004 Page 2 area for very Iow density single-family residential use, with a minimum lot size of 20,000 square feet, and a maximum residential density of up to two units per gross acre." c. The Development Code Table 17.08.030, lists the secondary permitted and conditionally permitted uses that may be allowed in the Very Low (.1-2 dwelling units per acre) Residential District, and in said Table, "Kennel," "dog kennel" or "dog-breeding kennel" is not listed. Rather, the applicant's dog-breeding kennel is specifically listed as an agricultural use that should only be permitted prior to development. Development Code Section 17.08.030.E., states that the following is a permitted use: "Prior to development, the following agricultural uses are either permitted or conditionally permitted on lots of 2.5 acres or more: Raising, grazing, breeding, boarding, or training of large or small animals, except concentrated lot feeding and commercial poultry and rabbit raising enterprises, subject to the following: Cats and dogs shall be limited to the keeping of no more than four cats and/or four dogs, over four months of age." Later, this same section indicates that the following use may be allowed subject to a Conditional Use Permit: "Dog kennels, dog training schools, small animal shelters, and dog breeding establishments with outside runs." Therefore, the intent is that dog breeding is an agricultural use more appropriate on lots of 2.5 acres or larger before development of land to its highest and best use (i.e., single-family residential). The proposed site for the use is on a lot smaller than 2.5 acres and already developed with a single-family residence; therefore the property does not qualify to have agricultural uses, such as dog breeding facilities. Therefore, this use is not allowed on the subject property. d. The use in question does not meet the purpose and the intent of the district in which it is proposed. The application applies to property in the Very Low (.1-2 dwelling units per acre) Residential District. The intent is that the primary use shall be single-family homes according to Development Code Section 17.08.020.A, which states: "This district is intended as an area for very Iow density single-family residential use, with a minimum lot size of 20,000 square feet, and a maximum residential density of up to two units per gross acre." e. The use in question does not meet and conform to the applicable goals and objectives of the General Plan. The General Plan states: "Our general policy direction has been and continues to be the protection of our single-family residential neighborhoods from development densities and intensities that would significantly diminish the quality of these neighborhoods." The City regulation is a maximum of three dogs on any residential lot, regardless of size. The applicant has ten dogs which, when barking, can be reasonably expected to be louder than three dogs. f. The March 22, 2004, appeal letter filed by the applicant, Mr. Knecht, gave no reason why he believes the Commission's decision was wrong, nor did his appeal provide any new facts or other evidence for the Council to consider. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The application contemplates the keeping and breeding of dogs, currently 10 in number, which exceeds the number of dogs currently permitted or conditionally permitted in the same district. b. The use is in conflict with the uses currently permitted in the Very Low Residential District and is only noted as an agricultural use permitted prior to development on lots of 2.5 acres or more. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. USE DETERMINATION DRC2004-00093 - STEVE KNECHT April 21,2004 Page 3 c. The use is in conflict with the primary intent of the Very Low Residential District, which is "for very Iow density single-family residential use." d. The use does not conform to the applicable goals and objectives of the General plan because of the number of dogs being kept and the potential for excessive noise, and possible odor concerns resulting from keeping this number of dogs. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, and 3, above, this Council hereby denies the appeal, and upholds the action of the Planning Commissionrepresented by Planning Commission Resolution No. 04-30. 5. This Council hereby provides notice to Mr. Steve Knecht, the appellant and original applicant, that the time within which judicial review of the decision represented by this Resolution must be sought is governed by the provisions of California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. 6. The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby directed to: (a) certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and (b) forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail, return-receipt requested, to Mr. Steve Knecht at the addresses identified in City records. R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A COMMUNITY SERVICES Staff Report DATE: April 21,2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III Karen McGuire-Emery, Senior Park Planner SUBJECT: PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE BACKGROUND In accordance with the City Council's request to become more informed of park and recreation facility issues, programs, projects and events, this report is provided to highlight pertinent issues, projects and programs occurring in both the Community Services Department and the Park Design/Development and Maintenance Sections of Engineering. A. PARKS AND FACILITIES UPDATE Central Park: · A lot of visible changes have taken place this month. The building is taking shape now that the slab has been poured and framing is proceeding well. Work has begun on the new Milliken entry and new curb and gutter have been installed along Base Line, with sidewalk and paving to follow. Central Park Landscape and Irrigation Project: · A pre-bid meeting was held on April 6t~ with American Landscape, Douglas Barnhart and the City. Work is scheduled to begin in May. Rancho Cucamonga Cultural Center Parking Project: · Work has been proceeding very well. The second level of the west parking structure is over 50 % complete and it is anticipated that the balance of the second level will be completed by April 21st. All columns, shear walls and retaining walls have been installed on the east structure. Underground fire, plumbing and electrical has been installed on half of the east structure with the balance to be completed by April 16m. The north and west retaining walls on the east structure are scheduled to be waterproofed by the April 21s~. City Council Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update Apdl 21, 2004 Heritage Park: · West Coast Netting completed the install of the new overhead netting on the senior field (old net damaged due to winds from fire). B. COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE Senior Services: · The V.I.P. Club will hold their annual Card Party at the Senior Center on Saturday, April 24, 2004, at 10:00 a.m. Play all of your favorite card games, play bingo, eat lunch, and have fun, fun, fun! This is a fund raising event for the V.I.P. Club. Come out and support it. · Senior Advisory Committee will hold its next regular meeting on Monday, April 26, 9:00 a.m. at the Senior Center. Human Services: · Senior Companion Preqram - For over 25 years Community Senior Services, a non-profit agency, has provided much needed support for senior and their families. The Senior Companion Program is one of nine services/programs offered. This program is designed to help senior in their homes by providing transportation, grocery shopping, community information and companionship. If you are 60 years of age, live on a limited income, would like to earn some extra money and become involved in your community, this program is for you. Please call (909) 593-7511 for more information. · Senior Help Line - The Help Line at (909) 596-1111 is a free service which will guide one through the maze of local senior services, with quick and easy information about hundreds of agencies. Sponsored by Community Senior Services · Senior Gasoline Service Preqram - A unique Gasoline Pumping Program to assist Rancho Cucamonga seniors, 60 and over was introduced by the Senior Advisory Committee in 1999. Nine Rancho Cucamonga service stations have agreed to participate in this program to provide attendant gas pumping for seniors at self-service prices. This service is particularly valuable to the very old and frail as well as many senior women. The ability to operate a motor vehicle is a vital component to large segment of seniors insuring full integration into society and independent living. The program is easily administered through the Senior Center, with a fairly simple procedure for seniors to participate. Each senior, 60 years of age and above, who registers in the program will receive (1) a list of participating stations and the procedures to follow, and (2) an I.D. placard to display in their vehicles. Each participating service station will provide, upon request, refueling service to a senior driver of a vehicle that displays the placard, at a self-service price. The program operates each week Monday through Friday between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. To receive your I.D. placard, register at the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center. · ClearView 500 Maqnifyinq Machine - The Senior Center recently received a ClearView 500 magnifying machine from the State of California Department of Rehabilitation. The machine was provided to the Senior Center specifically for the use by blind and visually impaired 15Z. City Council Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update April 21, 2004 seniors and is designed to magnify any document. Users may also use this helpful tool to complete bills, write letters, read a book, or even look at photos. The machine is available for use Monday through Friday, from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. · Shoppinq for Seniors - The following agencies provide alternative means for grocery shopping for seniors and others in the Rancho Cucamonga area: *:, Shoppin' For Seniors - Only pay for your groceries! No delivery fees! Shopping done at Stater Brothers. Some restrictions apply. Call (909) 799-7327 for more information. o:o whyrunout.com Stater Brothers. offers online shopping service through whyrunout.com. Delivery fees apply. Multiple stops possible. Call 1-877-274-6748 for more information. · For the first quarter of 2004, the total number of rides provided through the Senior Transportation Proqram, a joint venture between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho CucamongaJFontana Family YMCA was 2,524. Trips and Tours: · Champions On Ice, - April 24, 2004. Travel with us to the beautiful Arrowhead Pond of Anaheim to watch the best in ice entertainment! Featuring the following performers: Michelle Kwan, Irina Slutskaya, Timothy Goebel, Evgeni Plushenko, Elvis Stojko, Sasha Cohen, Victor Petrenko, Philippe Candeloro, Surya Bonaly, Nicole Bobek, Oksana Kazakova and Artur Dmitriev, Naomi Lang and Peter Tchemyshev, Dan Hollander, Irina Grigorian, Vladimir Besedin and Oleksiy Polishchuk, Ann Patdce McDonough, Fumie Suguri, Tatiana Totmyanina and Maxim Marinin, Elena Sokolova. Enjoy souvenirs and refreshments on your own! Cast of skaters subject to change. Cost: $58.00 per person. · California Strawberry Festival, May 15, 2004. What better way to spend a mid-spring afternoon than at the California Strawberry Festival! The delicious heart-shaped fruit of Oxnard is ripe and the 21st Annual California Strawberry Festival is ready to tempt the taste buds of Southern Californians everywhere. One of the nation's most popular weekend celebrations, the event is held May 15 and 16 and pays tasty tribute to the luscious fruit garnered from the City's bountiful 6,600 berry acres. Presented by the California Strawberry Festival Committee, this multi-faceted event serves up a menu of delectable strawberry delights from strawberry pizza and shortcake to chocolate dipped strawberries and more, along with non-stop entertainment, and participatory activities for berry lovers of all ages. Let us get you there; then it's shopping, food, and fun all on your own! Cost: $32.00 per person. Volunteer Services: The table on the following page summarizes CSD volunteer usage for the month of February 2004 and year-to-date: City Council Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update April 21, 2004 Month: Febuary 2004 YEAR TO DATE ~ of # of Volunteers ~ of Hours SValue Volunteers ~of Hours ;Value Admin 5 15 210 10 30 420 Sports 167 2,192 30,688 539 5,019 70,266 Sr & Human 58 450 6,300 121 916 12,824 Services Special 7 14 196 14 28 392 Events Youth 44 127 1,778 125 307 4,298 Programs *Based on value of $14.00 per hour. Teens: · The table below summarizes teen pro.qram participation for the month of March 2004: Program Attendance/Participation -March 2004 Teen Center 890 Homework Room 30 TRAC Babysitting 57 participants; 12 volunteers; 14 volunteer hours TRAC Monthly Activities 42participants Spruce Skate Facility 1,290 · The Spruce Park Skate Park - Participation numbers ara up due to the groat weather we have been having. Staff continues to meet with regular participants on a monthly basis discussing park issues, new safety information, laws and u~coming major event in other cities. Currently staff is presenting safety assemblies for 4u' graders at five of our local elementary schools. The assemblies are a power point presentation that is lighthearted and fun with an educational component. Youngsters have the opportunity to win prizes for answering questions correctly. · Beginning on April 1st the Department is partnering with Lewis Apartment Communities to provide two programs for youngsters in the area. The first is an after school Teen Proqram for youth in grades 6th through 10th. This program is offered at Sycamore Apartments Monday through Friday from 2:00 p.m. until 5:00 p.m. Activities will include: a homework room complete with computers, games and activities. Cost for this program is $10.00 per week. In addition, a Kids Club has been started at Evergreen Apartments (Monday/Wednesday/Friday from 2:00 p.m.-5:00 p.m.) and the Del Mar Apartments (Tuesday/Thursday from 2:00 p.m.-5:00 p.m.). The Kids Club offers free drop-in recreational programming. Youth Activities: · Playschool registration for our winter session is currently at 715 students in 42 classes. All classes are filling up quickly with waiting lists developing for many of our classes. City Council Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update April 21, 2004 · The Mobile Recreation Program "Fun on the Run" is becoming a fun neighborhood event. The Fun on the Run Unit program is going very well this winter. This past month, 685 children were served through the program at 5 park sites. The program runs from January 5th through March 26th, Monday through Friday from 2:30 pm to 5:00 pm. The table bellows outlines the parks being visited during the reporting period: Wee kd ay Pa rk Location _,~,~I~.z~L]~j~..~_~_~_~ Monday Bear Gulch Park Tuesday Old Town Park Wednesday Hermosa Park Thursday Mountain View Park Friday Ellena Park Youth Enrichment Services Grant Program: ~ ~1~1 ~l~~ll~0 · The table below illustrates attendance/participation figures for programs/services provided through the YES Grant for the month of March 2004. Program Attendance/Participation FACTS Center Visits 1,485 Parent Education Classes 12 classes; 73 participants Car Seat Checks 55 Child Care 38 Youth Sports: · The Sports Advisory Committee met on April 14, 2004. At this meeting the fall/winter field allocation requests were due for the timeframe of August 1, 2004 through January 31, 2005. The next meeting on the Committee will be on May 12, 2004. · The table below summarizes youth sports activities for the reporting period; Activity # Participants Age/Gender # Teams Pee Wee Soccer 350 3-5/boys & girls 35 Youth Basketball 950 6-16/boys & girls 122 Inland Valley Basketball 320 8-9/boys & girls 16 Tournament at RC Family Sports Center Track & Field Program 96 8-14/boys & girls N/A : Track & Field Meet 120 8-14/boys & girls N/A Rancho Cucamonga Middle 67 8-17/boys & girls 7 School (RCMS) Youth Basketball Cucamonga Middle School 120 8-14/boys & girls 4 (RCMS) Youth Basketball Practice Cucamonga Middle School 120 8-Adult N/A (CMS) Judo City Council Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update April 21,2004 RC Family Sports Center: · The table below provides drop-in/open play participation at the Center for the reporting period: Activity # Participants Adult Basketball 656 Youth Basketball 1,295 Adult Racquetball 403 Youth Racquetball 44 Adult Volleyball 48 Youth Volleyball 8 Jazzercise 1,320 · The table below summarizes organized adult activity at the Sports Center during the reporting period: Activity # Participants Age/Gender # Teams Racquetball 15 Adult]Males N/A Basketball (full court) 100 Adult]Males 10 Basketball (3-on-3) 40 Adult]Males 8 · The City will be hosting the Boys "C" Division Basketball Tournament on March 20th and 21st at the Rancho Cucamonga Family Sports Center. Approximately 15 cities from the Inland Empire will be participating. In addition, JoAnn Gwynn our Youth Sports Recreation Coordinator will be chairing the entire tournament that will be accommodating over 70 teams in the cities of Fontana, Colton, Riverside and Rancho Cucamonga. Adult Sports: · Four (4) adult softball tournaments are scheduled at the Epicenter and Adult Sports Complex during the month of April 2004. · Thirty (30) adults are participating in our tennis leaques. · The table below summarizes adult sports activities at the Epicenter for the reporting period: Activity # Participants # Teams Gender Softball 2,480 155 Males/Females Soccer 640 40 Males/Females Flag Football 80 8 Males Non-Profit Sports Organizations: · Bi-annually, the Community Services Department, through the Sports Advisory Committee allocates sport fields for non-profit orqanized youth sport lea.ques. For the reporting period, 10 non-profit sport groups utilized 18 City parks and had 59,907 participants and spectators enjoying our parks during both practices and game times. City Council Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update April 21, 2004 Special Events: · Northtown Housing Development Corporation and the Community Services Department are meeting to plan this year's Cinco de Mayo celebration that will take place on Saturday, May 1, 2004, at Old Town Park. The event will run from 12:00 noon until 5:00 p.m. and will include traditional mariachi bands, a Tex Mex band, ballet folklorico and Aztec dancers, face painting, activities and game booths for youngsters, authentic Mexican food and a classic car show. · Staff is currently programming our upcoming summer events, for 2004 including: the 4th of July celebration that will take place this year at the Epicenter due to construction at Chaffey College, and the Concerts in the Park and the Movies in the Park series. Performing and Cultural Arts: · Over 1700 people, young and old, attended the brief run (only four performances) of the City's production of "Joseph and the Amazinq Technicolor Dreamcoat" presented March 25th through Mamh 28t~ at the Alta Loma High School Theatre. The show, which featured 58 community members from Rancho Cucamonga and nearby cities, drew the largest audiences ever for the City's theatre program, breaking all box office and attendance records for the past five productions. The production earned an excellent review from Theatre Critic Don Maslowski in the Daily Bulletin, who praised the production for its talented cast, beautiful voices and difficult yet well executed dance numbers, comparing it to the professional touring production currently moving through southern California, only giving the RC production higher marks for its sheer vitality and youthful energy. The review concluded its lengthy praise for the production with the simple statement: "It doesn't get much better that this." The show's directors, Keely Milliken and Alison Hooper, rehearsed with the cast three times per week for ten weeks prior to the show's opening which turned out strong soloist voices, beautiful choral harmonies, and extremely challenging dance moves. Several Rancho Cucamonga residents were showcased in the various musical numbers including three exceptional soloists, Gary Ablard, Brandon Alpert, and Julian Arrellano who, as Joseph's jealous brothers, provided humor and added to the non-stop energy. We are pleased to say that Milliken and Hooper have agreed to return to direct again next year. · As one show ends, another begins, as the City plans for the summer family musical, "The Music Man". to be presented July 9, 10, 11, 16, 17 and 18th. Auditions for this classic Broadway show will be held April 28th and May 1st and is open to all community members age 8 though adult. A variety of ages will be cast to represent the varied citizens of a small town in Iowa, around the turn of the century, who are swept up in a slick con man's scheme to start a boy's marching band. Notable numbers from "The Music Man" include the rousing "76 Trombones" and romantic ballad "Till There Was You." The production will be directed by Barbara Hinrichsen & John LaLonde, who have headed four of the City's previous productions including "The Sound of Music", "The Pajama Game", "Once Upon a Mattress" and last summer's "Bye, Bye Birdie". Joining Hinrichsen and LaLonde will be Doug Austin as Vocal Director, and Michele Stevens as Choreographer, both who have served on the production team for past productions with the City. "The Music Man" will mark the City's seventh musical theatre production. 157 City Council Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update April 21, 2004 · The RC Performance Troupe will perform live on RCTV-3 during the "Kids Connect with Culture", at the Library Telethon, as well as in a taped segment, showing off their singing and dancing abilities on Saturday, April 17th during the evening showcase hosted by opera singer Rod Gilfry. The Troupe is now in its second year of existence and is guided by instructors Keely Milliken (vocal instruction) and Alison Hooper (dance instruction). The Troupe meets each Saturday morning for 10 consecutive weeks per quarter/session, beginning with the fall session and concluding with the spring session. The Troupe also will perform at the "Quakes Connect with Culture" event on May 15th and will also perform the year's line-up of musical numbers and routines at a Starlight Showcase on June 12th at the Chaffey College theatre. The Troupe disbands for the summer and auditions will be held in September to select the 2004-2005 Troupe. · James V. Curatalo Performinq Arts Memorial Scholarship Fund - Youth between the ages of 8 and 18 can now apply for scholarship funding in which to participate in a number of the City's performing arts classes, programs and productions. Awards in the amount of $200 each will be given to selected youth who best express their desire to develop their performing arts talents and experiences. Information on this new scholarship fund is available in the spring issue of The Grapevine and on our City's website at www. RCPark.com. Park and Facilities: · The table below provides usage information for park picnic shelters and special use facilities for the month of February 2004. Location/Facility Attendance Number of Number Hours of Use Applications of Processed Rentals Red Hill Community Park Picnic 985 22 26 75 Shelters Heritage Community 565 18 18 57 Park Picnic Shelters Hermosa Park Picnic Shelter 190 6 6 23 Milliken Park Picnic Shelter 308 11 12 39 Coyote Canyon Picnic Shelter 180 5 7 19 Civic Center Courtyard* 0 0 0 0 Amphitheater 0 0 0 0 Equestrian Unknown 4 4 25 * Not available due to Civic Center construction project. Heritage Park Equestrian Center: · Equestrian Center usa,qe for the month of April 2004 is shown in the table below and on the following page: Group Date Event/Time Frame Alta Loma Riding Club April 1s' Board Meeting/7-8:30 p.m. Rising Stars of April 3~ Easter Show/7-4:00 p.m. Equestrian Therapy Equestrian Patrol April 8'" Meeting/6-9:00 p.m. San Bemardino County April 10th Large Animal Rescue Training/8-4:00 p.m. San Bernardino County April 14t~ Large Animal Rescue Training/8-4:00 p.m. City Council Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update April 21, 2004 Group Date Event/Time Frame 4-H Club April 17t' Horse Mastership Testing/8-4:00 p.m. 4-H Club April 19t' General Meeting/7-9:00 p.m. Alta Loma Riding Club April 20t~ Membership Meeting/7-8:30 p.m. San Bernardino April 24~ Animal Rescue Clinic/9-12-noon Alta Loma Riding Club April 25t~ Horse Show/9-3:00 p.m. Facilities: · The table below displays buildin,q rentals and recreation contract class attendance numbers for the month of March 2004. Activity Program Numbers March Attendance Lions East Rentals 113 bookings 2,100 Lions East Building 403 facility hours 5,101 Lions West Rentals 240 bookings 2,180 Lions West Building 761 facility hours 6,745 Winter Session Recreation 308 classes 8,163 Contract Classes · Staff is continuing to meet quarterly with users of the Equestrian Center to address maintenance needs and programming. Our local groups are very cooperative and supportive of the City's efforts. · Park monitors keep daily reports of activities in our parks, often helping out residents in need of assistance. Departmental/City Marketing: · Marketing efforts continue being implemented fro the promotion of the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center and the Promotinq Arts and Literacy (PAL) fundraising campaign. Staff provided information/table-top displays to three community events in order to increase awareness of the project. · A press conference was held on April 8~h to announce the $1,000,000 pledge by the Lewis Family for the Playhouse Theatre at the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center. In addition, the press conference provided marketing assistance for the Library Telethon being held April 16-18, 2004. · Bookcovers were created as part of the "Bucks for Bricks" appeal benefiting the Library at the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center. · "Buildinq the Dream - Central Park I1" show to air on RCTV 3 currently in production to continue sharing construction progress to the community about the construction of Phase 1 of Central Park. · inland Counties Television Network (ICTN) taped a on-site piece regarding the Central Park project on March 18th, the exact air date is not know. Staff has requested a copy of the aired piece. City Council Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update April 21, 2004 · The March issue of the "Central Park Newsletter'' was published (available for download via RCpark.com webstie). Over 150 individuals are currently signed-up to receive notification of the every other month publication. Epicenter Marketing: · A postcard mailer is being developed to promote the designation of "Finest Class 'A" Stadium in the Country" by Baseball America for mailing to film industry location scouts. Park and Recreation Commission; · The next meeting of the Park and Recreation Commission is scheduled for April 15, 2004. At this meeting the following items are scheduled to be discussed/acted upon by the Commission: Update on Senior Advisory Committee. Update on Sports Advisory Committee. Update on Central Park Project. Update on Victoria Gardens Cultural Center Project. Commission discussion regarding attendance at the California and Pacific Southwest Recreation and Park Training Conference held March 10-13, 2004. Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation: · The Rancho Cucamonqa Community Foundation met on April 21, 2004. The following items were discussed/acted upon at this meeting. Update on the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center Project. Further refinement of restructuring options for the Community Foundation Board. Report and Discussion of Board Member Goals and Objectives for the PAL Fundraising Campaign. > Refinement of parameters regarding the Community Foundation's Gala. > Foundation member update and discussion on solicitation efforts for the PAL Fundraising Campaign. Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter: · The following activities/rentals took place during the reporting period: ~. Tommy and Mike Productions - Car Sale - April 1, 2004 through April 5, 2004 - Epicenter Special Event Area. > Abundant Living Family Church - Easter Services - April 10 and 11th, 2004 - Epicenter Stadium and Baseball Fields. > NonStop Pictures - Hampton Inn TV Commercial- April 15, 2004 - Epicenter Stadium. · Staff is in the process of working with the following applicants for future activities at the Epicenter: > BBC - Television Show Comedy Shot - April 22, 2004 - Epicenter Stadium. City Council Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update April 21, 2004 Mt. Baldy Boy Scouts of America - Scout-O-Rama - April 30 - May 2nd, 2004 - Epicenter and Adult Sports Complex - Soccer Fields. Maintenance Superintendents Association - Mini Equipment Show - May 27, 2004 - Epicenter Parking Lots A & B. RC Police Department - Bike Rodeo - June 5, 2004 - Epicenter Special Event Area. Daily Bulletin/Quakes/City - Ali-Star Game - June 8, 2004 - Epicenter Stadium. Rancho Cucamonga High School - Graduation - June 10, 2004 - Epicenter Stadium. ~O~e O,Neil Community Services Director City Engineer h~COMMSERWCouncil&Boards~CityCouncil~StaffReports~2004~update4.21.04.d~c T H E C I T Y 0 F RANCHO CUCAMONGA StaffRe rt DATE: April 21,2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Rex Gutierrez, Council Member Robed Howdyshell, Council Member SUBJECT: Animal Shelter Ad Hoc Subcommittee Update Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council receive the information update on new Animal Shelter and animal care programs and approve an appropriation of funds to establish a foster care program through a partnership with local non-profit organization H.O.P.E. (Helping Out Pets Everyday). Background On October 15, 2003, the City Council approved the recommendations of the Animal Shelter Ad Hoc Subcommittee to investigate and establish a numl~er of new animal care programs and services. The following information provides updates on several exciting new programs to enhance the services provided at the Animal Shelter: · City of Rancho Cucamon.qa Spay and Neuter Voucher Proqram At the recommendation of the Animal Shelter Ad Hoc Committee, the City Council approved the use of $5,000 in City funds to establish the Rancho Cucamonga Spay and Neuter Voucher Program to promote responsible pet ownership in our community. This new program was launched in March 2004 and has been very popular. In the 7 weeks since we commenced offering the vouchers, the City has issued 49 vouchers to our residents. This represents $1,950 in funds to assist with the costs of spay and neuter procedures. Information on the voucher program and process is attached for your information. · Spaymobile The Humane Society of San Bernardino Valley operates a mobile spay/neuter and vaccination clinic. The Humane Society will bring the "Spaymobile" to areas of the City that are producing the most numbers of unwanted animals. Daily cost of operation is $1,400 and the Humane Society asks the City to pay half of that cost. Council previously approved the use of City funds to provide this service to our community and the Spaymobile is scheduled to be at Old Town Park on Feron Boulevard on Saturday, June 12. City staff will work closely with the Humane Society to publicize this service in order that interested residents will make an April 21,2004 Staff Report: Animal Shelter Ad Hoc Subcommittee Recommendations Page 2 of 2 appointment with the Humane Society and take advantage of this opportunity for convenient, Iow-cost spay and neuter services, as well as Iow-cost vaccinations, in their own neighborhood. The "Spaymobile" can perform approximately 20 operations per day. · Shelter Foster Care Proqram The City Council directed staff to work with the County to explore shelter animal foster care programs and the feasibility of establishing such a program at the Rancho Cucamonga Animal Shelter. City and Shelter staff have met with representatives from the local, non-profit organization H.O.P.E. (Helping Out Pets Everyday) to learn about their existing animal foster care programs they have through the Upland Animal Shelter. We recommend creating a partnership with H.O.P.E. and the Shelter to establish a cat foster care program with the goal of decreasing the number of cats euthanized at the Shelter. This is a pilot program focusing on cats, if the foster care program is as effective as we hope it will be, the program may be expanded to dogs in the future. H.O.P.E. has requested that City funds be made available to the foster families to provide formula, food, and medicine to the volunteers that agree to foster these animals. H.O.P.E. will provide all necessary screening of potential foster volunteers and work closely with Shelter staff in administration of this new program. H.O.P.E. has requested City funds in the amount of $2,000 be made available for foster care supplies for the volunteers and it is the recommendation of the Animal Shelter Ad Hoc Subcommittee that this request be approved by the City Council. City and Shelter staff will review all receipts submitted by H.O.P.E. for reimbursement to ensure that any City funds for this program are used for the fostering of animals in our community. Recommendations The Animal Shelter Ad Hoc Subcommitee recommends that the City Council approve the use of $2,000 in contract services contingency funds in the City's animal shelter budget to establish a foster care program through a partnership with the Animal Shelter and H.O.P.E. Respectfully Submitted, Michelle Dawson Management Analyst III Staff to City Manager/Animal Shelter Ad Hoc Subcommittee Rancho Cucamonga Spay and Neuter Voucher Program How it Works: · Pet owner calls POPCO: (877) 44POPCO (877) 447-6726 · POPCO screens caller to determine if funds other than the City's are available for the caller · Residence of the caller is verified for eligibility · POPCO faxes voucher request information to the City · City Manager's staff issues a voucher to the resident through the mail · Pet owner takes the voucher to one of the local participating veterinarians: Archibald Pet Hospital Alta Loma Animal Hospital 9790 19th Street 7289 Amethyst Avenue Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga Victoria Animal Hospital Humane Society of San Bernardino Valley 11438 Kenyon Way763 West Highland Avenue Rancho CucamongaSan Bernardino · Veterinarian signs the voucher and notes the cost of the procedure · Veterinarian forwards the voucher to the City for payment within 90. days of the issue date · The City reimburses the veterinarian for the voucher amount THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SPAY AND NEUTER VOUCHER PROGRAM THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, IN PARTNERSHIP WITH THE NON- PROm PET OVERPOPULATION COALITION (POPCO), OFFERS VOUCHERS TO CITY RESIDENTS TO ASSIST WITH THE COST OF SPAYING OK NEUTERING THEIR PETS. VOUCHERS ARE AVAILABLE BY CALLING POPCO AT (877) 44POPCO (877) 447-6726 FUNDING FOR. THIS PROGRAM 1S LIMITED, VOUCHERS WILL BE ISSUED ON A HRST-COME, HRST-SERVED BASIS. RANC:HO CUCAMONGA Be a part o£ the pet overpopulation solution--become a POPCO volunteer/ /~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Voucher Number SPAY AND NEUTER VOUCHER Pet Owner: Address: Telephone Number: City: Zip: Animal Information Circle One: Male Female Circle One: Cat Dog -- Breed: Color(s): Age: Authorized Fee: -- Veterinarian Hospital: Address: City: Zip: Date of Surgery: Veterinarian Signature: (Maximum Amount for Cat $25.00; Dog $50.00) FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 1SSUING AGENCY Name of Organization: Approval: Date: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Representative Signature: Issue Date: Accounting Approval: Date: Voucher expires 60 days from issue date. Surgery must be completed by that date for voucher to be valid. Voucher must be submitted for payment within 90 days of issue date. Participating Veterinary Clinics: Archibald Pet Hospital Alta Loma Animal Hospital Victoria Animal Hospital Humane Society of San Bernardino Valley 9790 19th Street 7289 Amethyst Avenue 11438 Kenyon Way 763 West Highland Avenue Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino 941-7310 987-6224 944-8944 882-2934 Please join us in helping the animal population in San Bemardino County by supporting this event! Join us for a day of food, music, snacks, games, contests, a BIG raffle, classic cars on display, animal shelter pet adoptions, and so much more! T-shirts available. Dash plaques for the 1 st 50 vehicles. Special awards! ~ PETS ON A LEASH ARE WELCOME TO ATTEND -- PLEASE NO DOGS IN HEAT and NO AGGRESSIVE DOGS.t! *Shelter Contacts: Microchips Sherry Beardsley or Jennifer Pennell Car Club Contact: at (909) 466-7387 Available! Eric Waymire (909) 283-0060 T H C I T Y O F RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE: April 21, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: James L. Markman, City Attorney BY: Darold Pieper, Deputy City Attorney SUBJECT: DECISION ON THE REQUEST OF DOUGLAS E. BARNHART, INC., TO SUBSTITUTE COAST ROOF CO. FOR ZSOLT KISS, INC., DBA GOLDEN STATE ROOFING, ON THE CENTRAL PARK SENIOR/ COMMUNITY CENTER PROJECT BACKGROUND: The City of Rancho Cucamonga is constructing the Central Park Senior/Community Center Construction Project (the "Project"). Douglas E. Barnhart, Inc. ("Barnhart"), is the prime contractor on the Project, and Zsolt Kiss, Inc., dba Golden State Roofing ("Golden State"), is currently a subcontractor to Barnhart. Barnhart has requested that it be permitted to substitute Coast Roof Co. in place of Golden State as a subcontractor pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 4107(a) because Golden State has failed and refused to provide the required payment and performance bonds or to sign the required form of subcontract. Golden State objected to the proposed substitution and requested a hearing by the City pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 4107(a). The City Council previously adopted Resolution No. 04-008 providing that in any situation requiring the conduct of an evidentiary hearing to resolve a subcontract substitution dispute, the City Attorney, or designee thereof, shall conduct the hearing in accordance with the provisions of the Public Contract Code. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT RE: Subcontractor Substitution April 21,2004 Page 2 A hearing was held pursuant to Resolution No. 04-008 on April 6, 2004, before Darold Pieper, Deputy City Attorney, acting as the Hearing Officer, and he has prepared a Statement of Decision dated April 14, 2004. Attached to this report is the Statement of Decision, the transcript of the hearing, and all exhibits, affidavits and declarations admitted in evidence during the hearing, together with a proposed resolution that would constitute the City Council's decision in this matter. The Hearing Officer found that Golden State has failed and refused to provide the lawfully required payment and performance bonds, and to properly execute the required subcontract. The Statement of Decision recommends that Golden State's objections be overruled, and that Barnhart's substitution request be granted. The proposed resolution implements those findings and recommendations. Pursuant to Resolution No. 04-008 the City Council shall consider the Statement of Decision, transcript, other materials, and the resolution submitted to it, and shall take action thereon; the City Council, in its sole discretion, may adopt the submitted resolution, modify the submitted resolution and then adopt it, or direct the preparation of another resolution for its consideration and adoption; and the City Council's adoption of a resolution in reference to the dispute shall be the final action of the awarding authority taken to resolve the dispute. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS: The recommended action will have no fiscal impact on the Project. Any additional costs resulting from the proposed substitution will be the sole responsibility of Barnhart. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Find that the Statement of Decision, including its Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, is true and correct and adopt the Statement of Decision in its entirety as the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law of the City Council. 2. Overrule the objections of Golden State to the substitution request made by Barnhart. 3. Authorize Barnhart to substitute Coast Roof Co., Inc., in place of Golden State, pursuant to its written request of February 10, 2004, as authorized by Public Contract Code Section 4107(a). lq7 CiTY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT RE: Subcontractor Substitution April 21,2004 Page 3 ATTACHMENTS The Statement of Decision is attached to this staff report. The transcript of the hearing and the attached exhibits are too voluminous to be attached and are provided under separate cover. Respectfully submitted, Darold Pieper Deputy City Attorney l In Re the Matter of 2 DOUGLAS E. BARNHART, INC., 3 Petitioner, VS. 4 ZSOLT KISS, INC., dba GOLDEN 5 STATE ROOFING, 6 Respondent. 7 8 9 STATEMENT OF DECISION 10 11 On April 6, 2004, a hearing was held at the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Hall, in the Rains 12 Room, in connection with City of Rancho Cucamonga ("City") Central Park Senior/Community 13 Center Construction Project ("Project"). The heating was on the request for substitution of 14 subcontractor Zsolt Kiss, Inc., dba Golden State Roofing Company ("Golden State"), by prime 15 contractor Douglas E. Barnhart, Inc. ("Bamhart"). The hearing was held pursuant to California 16 Public Contract Code Sections 4107 and 4107.5~. The undersigned, Darold Pieper, Deputy City 17 Attorney, acted as the Hearing Officer pursuant to City Council Resolution No. 04-008. As a 18 result of the testimony and evidence presented by the parties at the hearing, the Hearing Officer 19 finds and reports to the City Council as follows: 20 21 Findings of Fact 22 1. Barnhart requested that the City permit it to substitute Coast Roof Co., Inc., in place of 23 Golden State by written request hand delivered to the City on February 10, 2004. The 24 request was based on Golden State's alleged failure to supply a payment and 25 performance bond pursuant to Section 4107(a)(4). 26 27 ~ All subsequent statutory references are to the Public Contract Code unless otherwise 28 stated. 11231-0130\771299v3 .doc Statement of Decision 1 2. Golden State filed an objection with the City to the substitution request and requested a 2 hearing by certified letter dated February 20, 2004. 3 3. The Hearing Officer served a Notice of Hearing dated March 25, 2004, on the parties by 4 certified mail, setting the hearing date and time as April 6, 2004, at 9:00 a.m. in the 5 Rains Room of the Rancho Cucamonga City Hall. 6 4. The hearing commenced at 9:00 a.m. on April 6, 2004, as scheduled. Golden State was 7 represented by Frank Kiss, acting in pro per, and Barnhart was represented by Eric G. 8 Stenman, Corporate Counsel. Witnesses were sworn and testimony was taken. 9 5. Bamhart required all subcontractors submitting bids in excess of $100,000 to provide a 10 payment and performance bond. ( eporter s Transcript, p. 16 line 19 p. 17 Iine 21, 11 Exhibit 2, Exhibit 3) 12 6. Bamhart published written notices inviting bids from subcontractors on August 19 and 13 August 22, 2003 (Barnhart Notices). (Reporter's Transcript, p. 16 line 25 - p. 17 line t4 21, Exh/bit 2, Exhibit 3) 15 7. The Bamhart Notices stated that all subcontractors submitting bids in excess of 16 $100,000 would be required to provide a payment and performance bond. (Reporter's 17 Transcript, p. 16 line 25 - p. 17 line 21, Exhibit 2, Exhibit 3) 18 8. The Barnhart Notices stated that Bamhart may pay up to 1% of a subcontractor's 19 payment and performance bond premium. (Reporter's Transcript, p. 16 line 25 - p. 17 20 line 21, Exhibit 2, Exhibit 3) 21 9. The Bamhart Notices required ali subcontractors submitting bids in excess orS100,000 22 to sign an "AGC San Diego Standard Long Form Subcontract and Waiver of 23 Subrogation." (Reporter's Transcript, p. 16 line 19 - p. 17 line 21, Exhibit 2, Exhibit 3) 24 10. Golden State asserts that the Bamhart Notices, being published only six and nine days 25 before the stated bid due date of August 29, 2003, did not comply with an unspecified 26 provision of California law requiring that subcontractors should receive at least 14 days 27 published notice before the bid due date, and that publication must take place within 28 some specified geographical region. Golden State offered no evidence that such a law 11231-0130\771299v3.doc Statement of Decision 1 does, in fact, exist, and Golden State's assertion was refuted by Barnhart (Reporter's 2 Transcript, p. 25 line 19 - p. 29 line 15, p. 60 line 21 p. 61 line 1) 3 11. Golden State submitted its bid to Bamhart in the total amount of $287,590 on 4 September 8, 2003, and its bid was accepted and utilized by Bamhart in formulating its 5 bid to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Golden State's bid did not make any reference to 6 payment or performance bonds. (Reporter's Transcript, p. 15 line 1 -p. 15 line 16, 7 Exhibit 1) 8 12. Barnhart tendered Golden State its "San Diego AGC Long Form Subcontract" 9 ("Barnhart Subcontract") by letter dated December 17, 2003, with instruction that it be 10 signed and returned together with its payment and performance bonds. (Reporter's 11 Transcript, p. 21 line 16 - p. 23 line 1, Exhibit 6) 12 13. The Bamhart Contract tendered to Golden State was in the sum of $293,34i, a figure 13 comprised of the bid amount of $287,590 plus the sum of $5,751 on account of the cost 14 of the payment and performance bond premium. This represented an allowance on 15 account of the premium of 2%, not the 1% offered in the published written notices. 16 (Reporter's Transcript, p. 23 line 3 - p. 24 line 3, Exhibit 2, Exhibit 3, Exhibit 7) 17 14. Frank R. Kiss acknowledged receipt of Bamhart's December 17, 2003, letter and 18 enclosures on behalf of Golden State on December 17, 2003. (Reporter's Transcript, p. 19 22 line 25 - p. 23 line 2, Exhibit 6) 20 15. The Barnhart Subcontract was signed by Frank R. Kiss for Golden State on or before 21 February 3, 2004, the date it was stamped received by Barnhart, and thereafter tendered 22 to Barnhart. (Exhibit 7, pp. 1 and 16). 23 16. The Barnhart Subcontract tendered to Bamhart by Golden State deleted the stated price 24 of $293,341, restored the price to the bid amount of $287,590, and deleted multiple 25 references to the subcontractor bonding required of Golden State. (Reporter's 26 Transcript, p. 23 line 3 -p. 24 line 16, Exhibit 7, pp. 2, 3, and 20) 27 17. Golden State has at all times refused, and continues to refuse, to provide payment and 28 performance bonds to Bamhart (Reporter's Transcript, p. 23 line 3 p. 25 line 8, p. Statement of Decision I 1231-0130\771299v3.doc 1 Exhibit 7, pp. 2, 3, and 20, Exhibit C) 2 18. Golden State denied that it ever read the two notices published by Barnhart (Exhibit 2 3 and Exhibit 3), further denies that it ever received any information from the isqft.com 4 website, and therefore asserts that it never learned of Bamhart's subcontractor bonding 5 requirements prior to submitting its bid. (Reporter's Transcript, p. 41 lines 17 - 25) 6 19. Golden State admitted that it obtained its information concerning the Project from the 7 Southern California Construction Bulletin - Inland Empire Edition, a publication of 8 Reed Construction Data published on July 28, 2003 ("Reed Notice") (Exhibit A), and a 9 list of pre-qualified bidders from the City dated July 24, 2004 ("City List") (Exhibit B). 10 (Reporter's Transcript, p. 36 line 5 - p. 39 line 4, p. 41 lines 14-19, p. 42 line 9 - p. 44 11 line 8, p. 62 lines 14 - 23, Exhibit A, Exhibit B) 12 20. The Reed Notice reflects that the original bid due date for the Project was August 19, 13 2003,. a date 22 calendar d~ys after the publication of the Reed notice. (Exhibit A) 14 21. Bamhart's original published notices reflected a bid due date of August 28, 2003, a date 15 31 calendar days after the publication of the Reed notice. (Exhibit 2, Exhibit 3, 16 Exhibit A) 17 22. The ultimate extended bid due date was September 10, 2003 ("Final Bid Due Date"), a 18 date 44 calendar days after the publication of the Reed Notice. (Reporter's Trm~script, 19 p. 29 lines 17 21, Exhibit 4, Exhibit A) 20 23. Golden State received the City List by fax on August 28, 2003, the same date as the 21 publication of the Reed Notice, and a date 44 calendar days before the Final Bid Due 22 Date. It did not receive the fax on August 26, 2003, as stated by Mr. Kiss, since that 23 date was a Saturday when the City offices were closed. (Reporter's Transcript, p. 42 24 line 20 - p. 43 line 9, Exhibit B) 25 24. The Barnhart Notices were first published on August 19, 2003, a date 22 calendar days 26 before the Final Bid Due Date. (Reporter's Transcript, p. 16 line 25 - p. 17 line 21, 27 Exhibit 2, Exhibit 3, Exhibit 4, Exhibit A) 28 /// -4. Statement of Decision 11231 0130\771299v3.doc 1 25. Golden State has offered no testimonial or written evidence that it made any effort to 2 contact Bamhart and learn of Bamhart's subcontracting requi~'ements following Golden 3 State's receipt of the information in the Reed Notice and the City List and prior to the 4 submission of its bid to Barnhart. (Reporter's Transcript, All Exhibits) 5 26. Golden State knew that it had no knowledge of Bamhart's subcontracting requirements 6 because it had not seen any of Barnhart's advertisements, but it took no steps to 7 ascertain that information even though it had least 22 and as many as 44 calendars days 8 in which contact Barnhart and obtain that information directly. (Findings 18 - 25) 9 10 Conclusions of Law I 1 1. Ail requests for substitution, a hearing, and notices of hearing were properly given as 12 required by law. (Findings 1 3) 13 2. No evidence was offered of any California law specifying the number of days in 14 advance of the bid date by which a notice inviting bids from subcontractors must be 15 published, or specifying the geographical region of such publication. (Finding 10) 16 3. Section 20164, which requires 10 days public notice before opening of bids, applies to 17 the publication of the notice inviting bids by cities, not to any notices published by 18 contractors for bids by subcontractors. 19 4. Bamhart published the Bamhart Notices inviting bids by subcontractors and included 20 the amount and requirements for subcontractor bonds as required by Section 4108(c). 21 (Findings 6 9) 22 5. The Bamhart Notices were legally sufficient in all respects. (Findings 6 - 9, 23 Conclusions 3 - 4) 24 6. If Golden State did not have timely knowledge of Bamhart's subcontracting 25 requirements before submitting its bid that lack of knowledge is due to lack of diligence 26 or to neglect on Golden State's part, and Golden State is estopped to assert that the 27 Bamhart Notices were not timely published or were not published in an appropriate 28 geographic region. (Finding 26) -5- Statement of Decision 1123143130\771299v3.doc /63 I 7. Pursuant to Section 4107(a)(4), Golden State has failed and refused to meet the bond 2 requirements of the prime contractor as set forth in Section 4108. (Finding 17) 3 8. Pursuant to Section 4107(a)(1), Golden State has failed and refused to execute a written 4 contract in accordance with the terms of that Section. (Finding 16) 5 9. Bamhart is legally entitled to substitute Coast Roof Co., Inc., in place of Golden State, 6 pursuant to its written request of February 10, 2004, as authorized by Section 4107(a). 7 8 Dated: April 14, 2004 9 12 Darold Pieper ~ ' ~;tJear:n~ Officer 13 14 Attachment: Reporter's Transcript with Exhibits 1-7 and A-C 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Statement of Decision A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MAKING FINDINGS, DENYING OBJECTIONS, AND APPROVING THE REQUEST OF DOUGLAS E. BARNHART, INC., TO SUBSTITUTE COAST ROOF CO. FOR ZSOLT KISS, INC., DBA GOLDEN STATE ROOFING, ON THE CENTRAL PARK SENIOR/ COMMUNITY CENTER PROJECT WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is constructing certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamunga known as the Central Park Senior/Community Center Construction Project (the "Project"). WHEREAS, Douglas E. Bamhart, Inc. ("Barnhart"), is the prime contractor on the Project. WHEREAS, Zsolt Kiss, Inc., dba Golden State Roofing ("Golden State"), is a subcontractor to Bamhart. WHEREAS, Barnhart has requested that it be permitted to substitute Coast Roof Co. in place of Golden State as a subcontractor pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 4107(a). WHEREAS, Golden State objected to the proposed substitution and requested a hearing by the City pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 4107(a). WHEREAS, the City Council has previously adopted Resolution No. 04-008 providing that in any situation specified in California Public Contract Code Section 4107 or 4107.5 requiring the conduct of an evidentiary heating to resolve a dispute as to whether a prime contractor should be allowed to substitute a subcontractor for a subcontractor listed in a submitted bid, the City Attorney, or designee thereof, shall conduct the hearing in accordance with the provisions of said sections of the Public Contract Code. WHEREAS, a hearing was held pursuant to Resolution No. 04-008 on April 6, 2004, before Darold Pieper, Deputy City Attorney, acting as the Heating Officer, and he has prepared a Statement of Decision dated April 14, 2004. WHEREAS, the transcript of the hearing, all exhibits, affidavits and declarations admitted in evidence during the hearing, a statement of decision, and a resolution constituting a proposed decision have been transmitted to the City Council as required by Resolution No. 04-008. WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the statement of decision, the transcript, the evidence admitted during the hearing, and the public testimony given at the City Council meeting of April 21, 2004. WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 04-008 the City Council shall consider the Statement of Decision, the transcript, other materials and resolution submitted to it, and the proposed resolution, and shall take action thereon; the City Council, in its sole discretion, may adopt the submitted resolution, modify the submitted resolution and then adopt it, or direct the preparation of another RESOLUTION NO. Page 2 resolution for its consideration and adoption; and the City Council's adoption of a resolution in reference to the dispute shall be the f'mal action of the awarding authority taken to resolve the dispute. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does find and decree as follows: 1. The Statement of Decision, including its Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, is tree and correct and is adopted in its entirety as the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law of the City Council. 2. The objections of Golden State to the substitution request of Bamhart are overruled. 3. Bamhart is authorized to substitute Coast Roof Co., Inc., in place of Golden State, pursuant to its written request of February 10, 2004, as authorized by Public Contract Code Section 4107(a). PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this April 21, 2004. William J. Alexander, Mayor ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, City Clerk 1, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the July 2nd, 2003. Executed this April 21 st, 2004, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk