Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2004/08/04 - Agenda Packet
'~, ~_,t~],~ '10500 Civic Center Drive + Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730-3801 AGENDAS [] City ~GULAR MEEtiNGS ~st and 3rd Wednesdays + 7:00 p.m. AGENCYs BOARD & CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS William J. Alexander .................... i~layor Diane Williams ............... l~tayor Pro Tern Rex Gutierrez ............................ Member Rober~ J. Howdyshell ............... Member Donald J. Kur~h, I~l.D ................ Member Jack Lam ......................... City iVlanager James L. i~larkman ............. City Attorney · Debra J. Adams ..................... City Clerk ©RDER OF BUSI~NESS 5:30 p.m. Closed Session .................... Tapia Conference Room 7:00 p.m. Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting... Council Chambers Regular City Council Meeting ............. Council Chambers INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC ~.~CHO ~ON~ TO ADDRESS THE CiTY COUNCIL The City Council encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the Agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the City Council on any agenda item. Please sign inon the clipboard located at the desk behind the staff table. It is important to list your name, address and phone number. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under "Public Communications". There is opportunity to speak under this section at the beginning and the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the City Council should be given to the City Clerk for distribution. To address the City Council, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. All items to be placed on a City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, one week prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's office receives all such items. AGENDA BACK-UP MATERIALS Staff reports and back-up materials for agenda items are available for review at the City Clerk's counter and the Public Library. A complete copy of the agenda is also available at the sign in desk located behind the staff table during the Council meeting. LIVE BROADCAST Council meetings are broadcast live on Channel 3 for those with cable television access. Meetings are rebroadcast on the second and fourth Wednesdays of each month at 11:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. The City has added the option for customers without cable access to view the meetings "on-demand" from their computers. The added feature of "Streaming Video On Demand" is available on the City's website at www.ci.rancho- cucamonga.ca.us/whatsnew.htm for those with Hi-bandwidth (DSt/Cable Modem) or Low-bandwidth (Dial-up) Internet service. The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers Located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Members of the City Council also sit as the Redevelopment Agency and the Fire District Board. Copies of City Council agendas and minutes can be found at http:llwww, cLrancho-cucamonga, ca.us If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477-2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA AUGUST 4, 2004 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS~ CITY RANCHO HALL, 10500 Civic CENTER DRIVE ~.U~AMONGA 1. Roll Call: Alexander __, Gutierrez __, Howdyshell__, Kurth__, and Williams__. a. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS II c. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. It D. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS I This is the time and place for reports to be made by members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda. I E. CONSENT CALENDAR I The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember or member of the audience for discussion. 1. Approval of Minutes: June 15, 2004 (Special Joint Meeting) June 16, 2004 2. Approval of Warrants, Register July 14 through July 26, 2004, and Payroll ending July 26, 2004, for the total amount of $4,440,268.87. 3. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for 28 the Highland Avenue Landscape Improvements east of Day Creek Boulevard, to be funded from Acct. No. 11103165650/1454110-0. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ; AUGUST 4, 2004 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY (..~RANCHo HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE UCAMONGA RESOLUTION NO. 04-245 31 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR "THE HIGHLAND AVENUE LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS EAST OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD" IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS 4. Approval of Final Map and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape 36 Maintenance District No. 9 and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 8 for Tract Map 16454, located at the southeast corner of Base Line Road and Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by KB Home Greater Los Angeles, Inc. RESOLUTION NO. 04-246 39 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NO. 16454 RESOLUTION NO. 04-247 40 A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 9 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 8 FOR TRACT MAP 16454 5. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and 51 Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 for SUBTT16545, located on the southwest corner of Archibald Avenue and Banyan Street, submitted by Cucamonga Ventures, LLC. RESOLUTION NO. 04-248 54 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT NO. 16545, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA AUGUST 4, 2004 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY 3 RANCHO HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE ~.UC~AMONGA RESOLUTION NO. 04-249 55 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR TRACT NO. 16545 6. Approval for use of the existing Senior Center Building for theater arts 63 programming during the interim time period between the opening of the new Central Park Senior Center and the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center. 7. Approval .of a Resolution authorizing the destruction of City Records 64 pursuant to California Government Code Section 34090, the City's Records Retention Schedule, and other applicable legal citations. RESOLUTION NO. 04-250 65 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF CITY RECORDS WHICH ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED AS SET FORTH IN CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 34090 AND OTHER APPLICABLE LEGAL REFERENCES 8. Approval of a Grant of Easement to Southern California Edison 92 Company for the underground work along East Avenue from north of Banyan Street to north of 23rd Street for the consideration of Fire Station No. 176. RESOLUTION NO. 04-251 94 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE GRANT OF EASEMENT TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY 9. Approval of an Amendment to Reimbursement Agreement, SRA-35, 95 for Traffic Signal Installation at Carnelian and Vivero Streets, in conjunction with the development of Tract 15783, located on the west side of Carnelian Street at Vivero Street, submitted by G & D Construction, Inc., to be funded from Transportation Reimbursement Acct. No. 11243035650/1026124-0. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA AUGUST 4, 2004 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY 4 RANCHO HALL, 10500 Civic CENTER DRIVE RESOLUTION NO. 04-252 98 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION AT THE INTERSECTION OF CARNELIAN AND VIVERO STREETS, SRA-35 10. Approval of a Map and Development Review DRC2002-00292 for 99 Parcel Map 16044, located on the southeast corner of White Oak Avenue and Arrow Route, submitted by Capellino and Associates. RESOLUTION NO. 04-253 103 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NO. 16044 1. Approval of a Proposal for Co-Sponsorship and Waiver of Various 104 Fees and Charges for the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce's Carnival and Grape Harvest Festival scheduled for October 1 - 3, 2004, at the Epicenter Special Event Area. 2. Approval of a request to issue a Public Convenience and Necessity, 107 DRC2004-00617-Chevron, for a Type 21 off-sale liquor license for a Chevron gas station in the Community Commercial District, located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, west of Vineyard Avenue at 8801 Foothill Boulevard -APN: 0207-211-12 through 15, 38 and 40. RESOLUTION NO. 04-254 1 11 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A DETERMINATION OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY DRC2004-00617 FOR A CONVENIENCE MARKET (CHEVRON SERVICE STATION) OF BEER, WINE, GOURMET FOOD, AND RELATED ITEMS, LOCATED WEST OF VINEYARD AVENUE AND SOUTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF- APN: 0207-211-12, THRU 15, 38 AND 40 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA AUGUST 4, 2004 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD In THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY 5 ~CHO HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE 13. Approval to award the Structural Steel and Miscellaneous Metals 113 and Metal Decking Contract to W&W Steel (CO 04-101), for the construction of the Rancho Cucamonga Cultural Center Project, totaling $6,700,000 and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency, of $670,000, for a total of $7,370,000 to be funded from 2001 Tax Allocation Bonds to Redevelopment Agency Account No. 2650801-5650/1357650-6314, State Library Grant Funds Account No. 1310602-5650/1357310-6314, and authorize the appropriation of $5,323,150 into Account No. 2650801- 5650/1357650-6314, and the appropriation of $2,046,850 into Account No. 1310602-5650/1357310-6314. Also, approval of the plan check/permit fees associated with the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center Project; and approval of a budget appropriation of $185,000 into Account Number 2650801-5650/1357650-6320. 14. Approval of an Acquisition Agreement (CO 04-105) for the City to 114 acquire off-site property, security and deposits for Tract Map 16454, located at the southeast corner of Base Line Road and Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by KB Home Greater Los Angeles, Inc. RESOLUTION NO. 04-255 'l'17 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN ACQUISITION AGREEMENT OF OFF-SITE PROPERTY, SECURITY, AND DEPOSIT FOR TRACT MAP 16454, FROM KB HOME GREATER LOS ANGELES, INC., AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME 15. Approval of a Professional Services Agreement with SB&O, Inc. (CO 04-106) in the amount of $37,000, and authorize the expenditure of a '118 10% contingency in the amount of $3,700 to provide Fiscal year 2004/2005 Topographical Design Survey Services for proposed capital improvement projects at various locations within the City, to be funded from Measure I, Drainage, Beautification and Transportation Funds. 16. Approval of a Resolution approving a Boundary Map showing the boundaries of the territory proposed for inclusion in proposed Community Facilities District No. 2004-01 (Rancho Etiwanda Estates). RESOLUTION NO. 04-256 123 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A BOUNDARY MAP SHOWING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE TERRITORY PROPOSED FOR THE INCLUSION IN PROPOSED COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2004-01 (RANCHO ETIWAN DA ESTATES) CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ' AUGUST 4, 2004 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY 6 [~CHO HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE {'~I/CAMONGA 17. Approval of a Resolution declaring the City's intention to establish 126 Community Facilities District No. 2004-01 (Rancho Etiwanda Estates) and to authorize the levy of a special tax therein to finance the provision of certain public services and the acquisition of certain public facilities. RESOLUTION NO. 04-257 128 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ESTABLISH COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2004-01 (RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES) AND TO AUTHORIZE THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX THEREIN TO FINANCE THE PROVISIONS OF CERTAIN PUBLIC SERVICES AND THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN PUBLIC FACILITIES 18. Approval of a Resolution ordering and directing the preparation of a 147 report for Proposed Community Facilities District No. 2004-01 (Rancho Etiwanda Estates). RESOLUTION NO. 04-258 149 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING AND DIRECTING THE PREPARATION OF A REPORT FOR PROPOSED COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2004-01 (RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES) 19. Approval of a Resolution declaring intention to issue bonds secured 15'1 by special taxes to pay for the acquisition or construction of certain public facilities in Community Facilities District No. 2004-01 (Rancho Etiwanda Estates). RESOLUTION NO. 04-259 153 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING INTENTION TO ISSUE BONDS SECURED BY SPECIAL TAXES TO PAY FOR THE ACQUISITION OR CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN PUBLIC FACILITIES IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2004-01 (RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES) 20. Approval of a Resolution in support of the Measure I Extension which '1S6 will be placed on the November 2004 Ballot for voter approval. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA AUGUST 4, 2004 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY 7 (,~,RANcHO HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE UCAMONG~ RESOLUTION NO. 04-260 158 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, IN SUPPORT OF THE MEASURE I EXTENSION WHICH WILL BE PLACED ON THE NOVEMBER 2004 BALLOT FOR VOTER APPROVAL II F. CONSENT ORDINANCES The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non- controversial. The Council will act upon them at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion. 1. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2003-00409 - TRAIGH PACIFIC - A proposed Etiwanda North Specific Plan Amendment of approximately 168.77 acres of land from Very Low Residential (.1-2 dwelling units per acre), to Low residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and Flood Control/Resource Conservation and master-planned circulation modifications to the north, for land located north of the SCL corridor between Etiwanda Avenue and East Avenue - APN: 0225-083-05, 06, 07, 10, 22, 23, 25 and 26 and 0225-084-02. Related Files: Annexation DRC2003-01051, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT14749, General Plan Amendment DRC2003-00410 and Development Agreement DRC2003-00411. ORDINANCE NO. 729 (second reading) 160 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2003-00409, TO CHANGE THE DISTRICT DESIGNATION FROM VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL (.1-2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW RESIDENTIAL (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND FLOOD CONTROL/RESOURCE CONSERVATION FOR 168.77 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED NORTH OF THE LOWER SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON (SCL) CORRIDOR BETWEEN ETIWANDA AVENUE AND EAST AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF-APN: 0225-083-05, 06, 07, 10, 22, 23, 25, AND 26 AND 0225-084-02 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA AUGUST 4, 2004 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY 8 RANCHO HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE (~UCAMONGA 2. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2003-00411 - TRAIGH PACIFIC - A proposed Development Agreement to address specific conditions of development and annexation for 168.77 acres of land within the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, located north of the SCE corridor between Etiwanda Avenue and East Avenue - APN: 0225-083-05, 06, 07, 10, 22, 23, 25, and 26 and 0226-084-02. Related Files: Annexation DRC2003-1051, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT14749, Etiwanda North Specific Plan Amendment DRC2003-00409 and General Plan Amendment DRC2003-00410. ORDINANCE NO. 730 (second reading) 178 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2003-00411, A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND TRAIGH PACIFIC, FOR THE PURPOSE OF DEVELOPING AN APPROXIMATE 168.77 ACRE SITE WITH UP TO 289 RESIDENTIAL LOTS, FOR PROPERTIES GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON (SCE) CORRIDOR BETWEEN ETIWANDA AVENUE AND EAST AVENUE - APN: 0225-083-05, 06, 07, 10, 22, 23, 25, AND 26 AND 0225-084-02 II G.ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS I The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. 1. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF 220 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A NEW COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE FOR SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT, AND THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA POLICE DEPARTMENT, BY MODIFYING CERTAIN FEES ESTABLISHED IN RESOLUTION 03-030 RESOLUTION NO. 04-261 221 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A NEW COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE FOR SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT, AND THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA POLICE DEPARTMENT, BY MODIFYING CERTAIN FEES ESTABLISHED IN RESOLUTION 03-030 I CITY COUNCIL AGENDA AUGUST 4, 2004 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY 9 l~cH0 HALL, 10500 Civic CENTER DRIVE (~A~CAMONC~ II n. PUBLIC HEARINGS ] The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. 1. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING REGULATIONS 274 APPLICABLE TO VEHICULAR CRUISING, AND AMENDING THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE ORDINANCE NO. 731 (first reading) 276 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO VEHICULAR CRUISING, AND AMENDING THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE 2. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE FINDING AND DECLARING THAT DESIGNATED PRIVATE ROADS TO VICTORIA GARDENS, 279 AND PARKING STRUCTURES THEREIN, SHALL BE SUBJECT TO SPECIFIC PROVISIONS OF THE CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE ORDINANCE NO. 732 (first reading) 281 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FINDING AND DECLARING THAT DESIGNATED PRIVATE ROADS TO VICTORIA GARDENS, AND PARKING STRUCTURES THEREIN, SHALL BE SUBJECT TO SPECIFIC PROVISIONS OF THE CALIFORNIA VEHICULAR CODE II I. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. 1. LEGISLATIVE UPDATE - (Oral) 2. PRESENTATION OF POLICE DEPARTMENT'S "SAFE DRIVER RECOGNITION PROGRAM" - (Oral) 3. REQUEST BY THE FREEDOM'S FLAME MEMORIAL FOUNDATION TO USE FIRE STATION 174 FOR A 9/11 284 MEMORIAL EVENT CITY COUNCIL AGENDA AUGUST 4, 2004 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY l0 HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE J. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. 1. DESIGNATION OF A VOTING REPRESENTATIVE AND AN 288 ALTERNATE FOR THE LEAGUE OF CITIES ANNUAL MEETING K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR THE NEXT MEETING This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this meeting, only identified for the next meeting. L. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on July 29, 2004, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. June 15, 2004 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Special Joint Meetin¢~ A. CALLTO ORDER A special joint meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council and Planning Commission was held on Tuesday, June 15, 2004, in the Tri Communities Room of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 5:44 p.m. Present were Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, Robert J. Howdyshe11, Dr. Donald J. Kurth, Diane Williams and Mayor William J. Alexander. Present were Planning Commissioners: Richard Fletcher, Larry McNiel, Cristine McPhail, Para Stewart, and Chairman Rich Macias. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Brad Buller, City Planner; Larry Henderson, Principal Planner; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. B. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC No communication was made from the public. C. ITEM OF BUSINESS C1. DISCUSSION OF HAVEN AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT Brad Buller, City Planner, referred to a drawing on the wall that was provided by Lewis Homes and gave some background information on the Haven Overlay District (HOD). He indicated the City's center point was intended to be Haven and Foothill. He stated Haven Avenue was referred to as the "premier street." Mr. Buller also referred to information distributed to the Council and Commission, which is on file in the City Clerk's office. Mr. Bullet reported the highest demand of construction in the City is for housing units. He also felt a meeting of this type is productive so it can be discussed the possibility for more housing units in the City. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he is not opposed to housing as long as it is not overdone, but also felt there should be a good mixed use. He also indicated he felt Haven Avenue was beginning to be the stepchild. Councilmember Gutierrez asked what happens when a developer comes in and indicates they want to build something in a certain area. Brad Bullet, City Planner, advised they can test the water, and that there is a process for doing that. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he hopes the applicants are encouraged and not shot down. He stated the Council likes to know and cares what is going on. He felt a lot of attention has been put on Foothill. He stated Haven is a very interesting street with a lot going on. He hoped the City will keep an open mind. Joint City Council/Planning Commission Minutes June 15, 2004 Page 2 Commissioner McNiel stated in the early years, the Planning Commission got a reputation of being tough in its standards. He felt things do not have to happen immediately, and that the City and Haven do not have to be maxed out. He also indicated he did not think the mall would be a downtown area. He felt the housing on Haven, if approved, should be upper class and treated like the housing around the golf course. Councilmember Williams felt the old KMART Center should be developed and did not feel housing should come right up to Haven Avenue. She felt the overlay of Haven should include the original plan with office buildings along there. Mayor Alexander suggested there be mixed uses along Haven and felt they should be upscale. Chairman Macias stated they use the General Plan as a guiding document. He stated as a group they are open to innovative planning. Mayor Alexander felt the City should be open to ideas and listen to what developers are proposing. Councilmember Gutierrez also felt the KMART Center should have something done to it. Councilmember Kurth felt there should be a way to have it all and have it look nice and be upscale. Commissioner Fletcher stated he has always thought of Haven as upscale. He felt there should be a place for residents to go to work. He felt there were better areas, other than Haven Avenue, for mixed uses. He thought Haven should be preserved as office. Commissioner McPhail stated the Planning Commission does welcome innovative designs. She stated sometimes the market hinders the design that is presented to them. She felt the Planning Commission should encourage the finest of design, the best of materials and innovation, and that they should not settle for less. Commissioner Stewart stated she is not going to give up on Haven Avenue as office, but felt she is willing to listen to other ideas as well. She expressed the City needs senior housing, and felt there could be a high-end senior project on Haven. Mayor Alexander felt the Planning Commission needs to think about Iow and moderate housing as well because of State mandates. Addressing the Council and Commission was: David Lewis, Lewis Homes, stated they have envisioned first class office facilities for Haven Avenue just as the Council has mentioned. He stated what they are proposing is to have housing next to the existing housing on the west side of their property. He indicated this would be of the highest standards as they have done in the past for other projects. Councilmember Kurth felt the proposed plan portrays the goals he has in mind. Councilmember Williams added she did not feel any of this properly should be retail. Councilmember Kurth left the meeting at 7:10 p.m. Commissioner Stewart suggested the whole thing needs to be master planned. Joint City Council/Planning Commission Minutes June 15, 2004 Page 3 D. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 7:15 p.m. Sincerely, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved by Planning Commission: July 14, 2004 Approved by City Council: * June 16, 2004 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA C~TY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION MINUTES II A. CALL TO ORDERIl The Rancho Cucamonga City Council held a closed session on Wednesday, June 16, 2004, in the Tapia Room of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 5:30 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander. Present were Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, Robed J. Howdyshell, Donald J. Kurth, M.D., Diane Williams and Mayor William J. Alexander. Aisc present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director; George Rivera, Administrative Services Manager; Brad Buller, City Planner; and Trang Huynh, Building Official. ][ B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) [ . Mayor Alexander announced the closed session items. B1. LABOR NEGOTIATIONS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6 TO GIVE GEORGE RIVERA, ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES MANAGER; PAMELA EASTER, DEPUTY CITY MANAGER; AND LARRY TEMPLE, ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR, DIRECTION IN REGARDS TO THE MEET AND CONFER PROCESS - CITY B2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING POTENTIAL LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9 (ONE CASE) - CODE ENFORCEMENT. II C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) No communication was made on the closed session item. D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION The closed session began at 5:35 p.m. [[ E. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS F. RECESS The closed session recessed at 6:53 p.m. with no action taken. City Council Minutes June 16,2004 Page 2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Regular Meeting II A. CALL TO ORDER I A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, June 16, 2004, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor William J. Alexander called the meeting to order at 7:11 p.m. Present were Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, Robert J. Howdyshell, Donald J. Kurth, M.D,, Diane Williams and Mayor William J. Alexander. Aisc present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Mike Nelson, Sr. RDA Analyst; Jim Frost, City Treasurer, Joe Kamrani, Sr. Information Systems Analyst; Sam Davis, Information Systems Specialist; Jon Gillespie, Traffic Engineer; Brad Buller, City Planner; Larry Henderson, Principal Planner; Donald Granger, Assistant Planner; Trang Huynh, Building Official; Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director; Dave Moore, Recreation Superintendent; Paula Pachon, Management Analyst Ill; Bill Pallotto, Recreation Supervisor; Ryan Samples, Recreation Coordinator; Deborah Clark, Library Director; Captain Pete Odiz, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; Peter Bryan, Fire Chief and Mike Bell, Acting Deputy Fire Chief, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager; Kimberly Thomas, Management Analyst II; Kathy Scott, Deputy City Clerk; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. B1. Presentation of Commemorative Retirement Plaque to L. Dennis Michael, Fire Chief, in honor of his retirement after 28 years with the Fire District. Mayor Alexander, the City Council and City Manager presented Chief Michael with a commemorative retirement plaque and congratulated him on his retirement. Chief Michael stated it was a rewarding experience for him to have worked here. B2. Presentation of YWCA WVoman of Achievement Award" to Pauline Dean. Mayor Alexander and the City Council presented Ms. Dean with a Certificate and Proclamation. B3. Presentation of Proclamation to Deputies Brett Zour and Greg Hill for receiving the State MADD (Mothers Against Drunk Drivers) Award. Mayor Alexander and the City Council presented the Proclamation to Deputies Zour and Hill and congratulated them on this special recognition. B4. Presentation of Bicycle "Rodeo" by the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department and recognizing the contributors of the event. A power point presentation was given by Deputy Ron Ives, which is on file in the City Clerk's office. City Council Minutes June 16, 2004 Page 3 Il C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS II C1. John Lyons commented on Chief Michael retiring from the Fire District. He continued to talk about the District and the great organization it has become. He felt Chief Michael should be rewarded for his years of service and thanked him for the job he has done. C2. Melanie Ingram talked about her daughter's graduation from ALHS and added that Mayor Alexander also attended. C3. Nicole Myerchin commented on the need for people to foster a pet. She stated the number for HOPE is 989-8038. She stated the death of President Reagan made her stop to think about her life. She stated she stopped to think what a great leader is and felt it was all of the City Council. She hoped the Council will do the right thing with animals in the community because they have great hearts and souls. Il o. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS I D1. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he was sorry to miss the bicycle rodeo, but felt it was a successful event. He expressed his appreciation to Chief Michael for what he has done for the community. He stated the City is doing what they can to protect the animals at the animal shelter. He mentioned an elderly resident had called him stating they were not able to get out of their building because they had no elevator for access. He stated he would be talking to staff about these requirements. He stated he remains committed to the well being of people in the City. D2. Councilmember Howdyshell commented on the retirement of Chief Michael and the great job he has done, but felt Chief Bryan will do a great job behind him. He attended the Wells Fargo Bank grand opening and told how they were giving money to the schools. He stated the spay mobile was out this weekend doing a great job. He added he attended the bicycle rodeo this past weekend and mentioned what a great event it was. D3. Councilmember Kurth commented on the retirement of Chief Michael and congratulated him. He commented on the "happy trails" card he had received in the mail and how people should take care of the trails. He felt the bicycle rodeo was great and how much the children enjoyed it. He thanked the Police Department for all of the things they do in the community. He stated he has been walking in the Etiwanda area getting a feel for what people think about the City. He stated he heard comments on the recent water conservation efforts and felt everyone did a great job through this crisis. He also felt the Metropolitan Water District did a great job handling this emergency situation. He suggested there be a back-up system in place in case this type of situation occurs in the future. D4. Councilmember Williams also commented on how great an event the bicycle rodeo was. She stated she and Mayor Alexander attended the Route 210 Task Force meeting that recently took place. She stated there are still some issues that need to be resolved before it is finally complete and that the Task Force will continue with the meetings. She appreciated the work that the Task Force members have done. She stated she will be going to Sacramento on June 17 for a press conference re the initiative to save the City's revenue. She added that some of the legislators are challenging the Governor's initiative pertaining to this. She felt people should write Assemblyman Dutton to express their opinion. City Council Minutes June 16, 2004 Page 4 ][ t. CONSENT CALENDAR ] El. Approval of Minutes: May 19, 2004 (Kurth absent) E2. Approval of Warrants, Register May 25 through June 7, 2004, and Payroll ending June 7, 2004, for the total amount of $4,406,641.55. E3 Approve to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of May 31, 2004. E4. Approval of plans, specifications and estimates and to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the installation of fiber optic cabling on Base Line Road and at the Victoria Gardens Regional Center, to be funded from Acct. No. 17120015603. RESOLUTION NO. 04-190 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE INSTALLATION OF FIBER OPTIC CABLING ON BASE LINE ROAD AND AT THE VICTORIA GARDENS REGIONAL CENTER, IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS E5. Approval of Plans, Specifications and Estimates and to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for Improvements in Phase 01/03 Final Work of CFD's 2001-01 & 2003-01 for final street overlay, final striping, street and trail lighting, etc. on Day Creek Boulevard, Victoria Gardens Lane, Victoria Park lane, Arbor Lane and Church Street, to be funded from Acct. Nos. 16123035650/1442612-0 and 16143035650/1442614-0. RESOLUTION NO. 04-191 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS IN PHASE 01/03 FINAL WORK OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICTS 2001-01 AND 2003-01 (TO BE BID AND CONSTRUCTED AS ONE PROJECT), INCLUDING FINAL STREET OVERLAY, FINAL STRIPING, STREET AND TRAIL LIGHTING, ETC. ON DAY CREEK BOULEVARD, VICTORIA GARDENS LANE, VICTORIA PARK LANE, ARBOR LANE AND CHURCH STREET, IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS E6. Approval to pay Cucamonga Valley Water District $45,504 for costs associated with the Central Park Senior/Community Center Project from Park Development Fund Acct. 1120305-5650/1343120-0. E7. Approval to purchase annual server software license from CDW-G in the amount of $59,101, to be funded from Fiscal Year 2003/2004 General Fund, Administrative Services Depadment, Information Systems Division Acct. No. 1001-209-5152. E8. Approval of Landmark Designation DRC2003-01073 -Judy Spaulding, et al - A request to designate 26 walnut trees lining Beryl Avenue north of Hillside Road and south of Carrari Court as a Designated Local Landmark- APN: 1061-371-26, 27, 28, 29, 31, and 40. City Council Minutes June 16, 2004 Page 5 RESOLUTION NO. 04-192 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING HISTORIC LANDMARK DRC2003-01073, DESIGNATING THE 26 WALNUT TREES LINING BERYL AVENUE, LOCATED NORTH OF HILLSIDE ROAD AND SOUTH OF CARRARI COURT, A HISTORIC LOCAL LANDMARK; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1071-371-25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 31,33, AND 40 E9. Approval of Resolutions relating to the November 2, 2004 Election. RESOLUTION NO. 04-193 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN SAID CITY ON TUESDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF NOVEMBER 2004, FOR THE ELECTRON OF CERTAIN OFFICERS OF THE CITY AS REQUIRED BY THE PROVISIONS OF THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA RELATING TO GENERAL LAW CITIES, AND CONSOLIDATING SAID ELECTION WITH THE PRESIDENTIAL GENERAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON SAID DATE RESOLUTION NO. 04-194 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A CHARGE TO CANDIDATES FOR ELECTIVE OFFICE FOR PREPARATION OF MATERIALS SUBMITTED TO THE ELECTORATE AND THE COSTS OF THE CANDIDATES STATEMENT FOR THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN THE CITY ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 2, 2004 El0. Approval of Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1,2, and 6 for DRCDR00-79, located at the northwest corner of Haven Avenue and Civic Center Drive, submitted by Burnett Development Corporation and United Dominion Realty Trust. RESOLUTION NO. 04-195 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1,2 AND 6 FOR DRCDR00-79 Ell. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities, and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for DRC2003-00732, located on the north and south sides of Jack Benny Drive, east of Rochester Avenue, submitted by Bates-Evergreen Partners, LLC, and Stadium Plaza South, LLC. RESOLUTION NO. 04-196 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR DRC2003- 00732 City Council Minutes June 16, 2004 Page 6 RESOLUTION NO. 04-197 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DRC2005-00732 E12. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Nos. 1 and 6 for DRCDR00-41, located on the south side of 6th Street between Haven and Hermosa Avenues, submitted by Cabot Industrial Properties, L.P., a Delaware Limited Partnership. RESOLUTION NO. 04-198 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR DRCDR00-41 RESOLUTION NO. 04-199 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DRCDR00-41 E13. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for DRC2001-00805, located at 10863 and 10865 Jersey Boulevard, submitted by Ralph Karubian, Sol Stone, Marcia Stone, Charles Karubian and Laurence Karubian. RESOLUTION NO. 04-200 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DRC2001-00805 E14. Approval to accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $186,746.11 to the apparent Iow bidder, America West Landscape, Inc., (CO 04-066) and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $18,674.61, for the Carnelian Street Landscape Improvements from Vivero Street to 1000' south of Vivero Street, to be funded from Beautification funds, Acct. No. 11103165650/1172110-0. E15. Approval to authorize the City Manager to enter into a non-exclusive Master Power Purchase and Sale Agreement (Agreement) by and between the City and Coral Power, LLC, (CO 04-067) of Houston, Texas (Coral), subject to any modifications approved by the City Manager and the City Attorney, authorize the City Manager to execute the Confirmation Orders with Coral in amounts necessary to provide electric service to new customers, to be funded from Acct. No. 17053035209. E16. Approval to accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $77,666.90 to the apparent Iow bidder, Dye & Browning Construction, Inc., (CO 04-068) and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $7,766.69, for the ADA 2003-2004 Access Ramp and Drive Approach Improvements, to be funded from Pedestrian Grant/Article 3 and Measure "l" funds, Acct Nos. 12143035650/1150214-0 ($11,610.81) and 11763035650~1150176-0 ($73,822.78) City Council Minutes June 16, 2004 Page 7 E17. Approval to accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $1,633,776.57 to the apparent Iow bidder, Ecology Constructions, Inc., (CO 04-069) and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $163,377.66 for the Phase lB(E) of Community Facilities District 2001-01, including Landscaping and Amenities on Arbor Lane, to be funded from CFD 2001-01 funds, Acct. No. 16123036650/1442612-0. E18. Approval to accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $96,555.00 to the apparent Iow bidder, E.G.N. Construction, Inc., (CO 04-070) and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $9,655.50 for the Bus Bay on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, east of Haven Avenue, to be funded from AB2766 Air Quality Improvement funds and Measure "1" funds, Acct. Nos. 11053035650/1238105-0 ($70,000.00) and 11763035650/1238176-0 ($35,000.00) and appropriate an additional amount of $5,000.00 to Acct. No. 11763035650/1238176-0 from Measure "1" fund balance. E19. Approval of request to enter into a Lease Hold Agreement at the Epicenter Stadium, located at 8378 Rochester Avenue, between Verizon Wireless and the City of Rancho Cucamonga (CO 04-071) for the purpose of installing a wireless communication facility for Verizon Wireless Personal Communication Service. E20. Approval to accept the Modification of Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at Archibald Avenue and 19th Street, Contract No. 03-067 as complete, retain the Faithful Performance Bond as a Guarantee Bond, release the Labor and Material Bond, and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $36,674.00. RESOLUTION NO. 04-201 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE MODIFICATION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND 19TM STREET, CONTRACT NO. 03-067 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK E21. Approval to accept the 2003/2004 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation - Slurry Seal of Various Streets, Contract No. 03-068 as complete, release the bonds, accept a Maintenance Bond, and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $159,855.00. RESOLUTION NO. 04-202 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE 2003/2004 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - SLURRY SEAL OF VARIOUS STREETS, CONTRACT NO. 03-068 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK E22. Approval to accept the Highland Avenue Landscape Improvements east of Day Creek Boulevard, Contract No. 04-019 as complete, retain the Performance Bond as a Guarantee Bond, release the Labor and Material Bond, and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $78,868.00. RESOLUTION NO. 04-203 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE HIGHLAND AVENUE LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS EAST OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD, CONTRACT NO. 04-019 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK C!ty Council Minutes June 16, 2004 Page 8 MOTION: Moved by Kurth, seconded by Williams to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports contained within the Consent Calendar. Motion carried 5-0. il F, CONSENT ORDINANCES ] Fl. CONSIDERATION OF SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE FOR ENVIRONMENTAl ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT - DRC2001-00534 - CABOT INDUSTRIAl PROPERTIES, L.P. - A request to amend the circulation within the Industrial Park Development District, Subarea 6, to eliminate Center Avenue from 6th St. south to Trademark Parkway, submitted by Cabot Industrial Properties - APN's 209-072-06 -11, -16, -17 and -35. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 722. ORDINANCE NO. 722 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2001-00534, TO AMEND THE STREET CIRCULATION WITHIN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, SUBAREA 6, ELIMINATING THE EXTENSION OF CENTER AVENUE FROM 6TM STREET SOUTH TO TRADEMARK PARKWAY BY AMENDING SECTION 17.30.080, FIGURE 17.30.080-H OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA DEVELOPMENT CODE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Kurth to approve Ordinance No. 722. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS Gl. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND ANNEXATION DRC2002-00865 - RICHLAND PINEHURST, INC. - A proposed Annexation of 160.0 acres of land into the City of Rancho Cucamonga, located within the Etiwanda North Specific Plan on the north side of Wilson Avenue between Etiwanda Avenue and East Avenue - APN: 0225-083-01, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 20. Related Files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16072, Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00461, and Development Agreement DRC2002-00156. (CONTINUED FROM JUNE 2, 2004) CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16072 - RICHLAND PINEHURST, INC. - The proposed residential subdivision of approximately 150.8 acres into 359 lots in the Iow (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and Very-Low (.1-2 dwelling units per acre) Residential Districts, with an average density of 2.3 dwelling units per acre for the entire project, in the Upper Etiwanda Neighborhood of the Etiwanda Nodh Specific Plan, located on the north side of Wilson Avenue between Etiwanda Avenue and East Avenue - APN: 0225-083-01, 12, 13, 15, 16 and 20. Related Files: Development Agreement DRC2001-00156; Annexation DRC2002-00865, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00461. City Council Minutes June 16, 2004 Page 9 CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2002-00156 - RICHLAND PINEHURST, INC. - A proposed Development Agreement to address specific conditions of development and annexation for 150.8 acres of land located on the north side of Wilson Avenue between Etiwanda Avenue and East Avenue - APN: 0225-083-01, 12, 13, 15, 16 and 20. Related Files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16072, Annexation DRC2002-00865, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2002-00461. Staff report presented by Larry Henderson, Principal Planner. He stated there has been additional information distributed that was not included in the agenda packets and that it should be made part of the record. Councilmember Kurth inquired what the density was. Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, stated it is 2.3 units per acre, which is comparable to the projects to the west of this. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council were: Stan Morris, NBS Consulting, stated they started processing this through the County several years ago and started working with the City one-and-a-half years ago to go through the City's procedures. He stated he is asking the Council to approve this so they can continue with this process through LAFCO. Lewis Burrelson stated they are residents in the City. He adde,d that when he moved to the City it was planned, as he knew it, to have this area be Iow density. He hoped this would remain for the future. He stated as residents they will be stuck with whatever is built and wished the developer would have come to him to get his opinion of this project. Craig Sherman, representing the Habitat Wildlife and Sage Council, stated they are opposing this project and have submitted letters to the City Council regarding this, which are on file in the City Clerk's office. He continued to point out his reasons contained in his letters to the Council. Dr. Travis Longcore submitted information, which is on file in the City Clerk's office. He continued to talk about the information contained in the documents he submitted. He felt this information should be looked at. Patricia Burrelson stated she is concerned about the development in this area. She stated her neighbors did not get the notification for this meeting. She is concerned about the traffic on Wardman Bullock. She stated she is also concerned about having enough schools for all of these people. She felt the value of their homes will decrease because of the density being higher. She stated she will miss the fields for recreational uses and is opposed to this project. John Lyons felt this was butchering Etiwanda again. He stated he is concerned about there being enough water and also fire and police protection for this area. He felt a Mello-Roos Police and/or Fire District tax would be in order. He felt it should be reviewed as to flood control property being sold. Carol Douglas, Alta Loma Riding Club, felt one way or the other these homes will be built, whether they will be in the City or the County. She hoped this project will be built to City standards, but hoped they will be one-half acre lots. She stated the Riding Club suppor[s this annexation. Melanie Ingrain felt if certain things have not been taken care of through the EIR, etc., she felt the City should take more time to study this. She stated she is also concerned about water for this area. She stated she questioned if this could be annexed and left vacant. She stated she was not sure why this is needed. She felt they should be left as one-half acre lots. City Council Minutes June 16, 2004 Page 10 Jim Frost stated Rancho Cucamonga, as we know it, is going to cease to exist. He would like to see what the City can do in the future by looking at all of the vacant land. There being no further response, the public hearing was closed. James Markman, City Attorney, stated Mr. Sherman has submitted three original letters with photographs for the record. Councilmember Gutierrez stated his comments apply to all three of the public hearing items. He wanted to know how this area has changed as was mentioned previously. Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, explained how they took an average density of all these units to come up with what is being proposed. Councilmember Gutierrez stated this area is going to be developed one way or the other. He stated he is concerned about open space. He stated he is concerned about this area and added that is why he sits on the County's North Etiwanda Preserve Commission. He inquired if development continues at the rate it is going with land that has been spoken for in North Etiwanda, how many homes do we think we are looking at until we reach our boundaries and we get into open space that we can preserve. Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, stated there are projected 950 dwelling units, which would project a gross density of 1.18 dwelling units per acre for 800 acres of land. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he feels there is an effort to preserve open space in the City. He stated he does want to preserve the land of the City even though there is nothing the City can do to stop some of the building. Councilmember Howdyshell asked of the 800 acres to be annexed, how much of it is planned for open space. Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, referred to a map for this information. Councilmember Howdyshell asked if there will be taxes to cover emergency services. Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, stated yes. Mayor Alexander felt what would happen by not approving this is that it would go to the County and the City would not get any revenue for a development, but would still have to provide services and this would be built under County regulations. He felt the City would wind up with a better density by having this built under the City as opposed to the County. Councilmember Kurth felt if this development is built under County standards it will not meet City standards. He added if it is built under City standards, we can also preserve as much open space as possible. Councilmember Williams inquired the total number of units that would be built under the County as opposed to the City. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated counting all three of these annexations, there would be approximately 1,300 less units by this being done in the City. Councilmember Williams verified there would be trails, trailheads, etc. if this is done in the City. She also felt the landowners have rights to build. She did not feel the City has a lot of choice. She asked if the schools have to give a "will serve" before a project can be built. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated the laws have been changed on this so it is not a requirement, but the schools are aware of the annexations and the City has taken this into account. City Council Minutes June 16, 2004 Page 11 RESOLUTION NO. 04-204 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PREPARED FOR THE RICHLAND-PINEHURST RESIDENTIAL PROJECT, WHICH INCLUDES ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 160 ACRES, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16072, AND ASSOCIATED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, FOR A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 150.8 ACRES INTO 358 LOTS FOR SINGLE-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT, WITHIN THE LOW (2-4 DWELLING UN~TS PER ACRE) AND VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS (.1-2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS (.1-2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), IN THE UPPER ETIWANDA NEIGHBORHOOD OF THE ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF WILSON AVENUE BETWEEN ETIWANDA AVENUE AND EAST AVENUE- APN: 0225-083-01, 12, 13, 15, 16, AND 20 RESOLUTION NO. 04-205 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING INTENTION TO PURSUE A CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION AND REQUESTING THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION TO INITIATE PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNEXATION OF PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF WILSON AVENUE BETWEEN ETIWANDA AVENUE AND EAST AVENUE, AS DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A", DEPICTED IN EXHIBIT "B," AND OUTLINE IN EXHIBIT "C," THE PLAN OF SERVICES RESOLUTION NO. 04-206 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16072 FOR A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 358 LOTS ON APPROXIMATELY 150.8 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND VERY LOW (.1-2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS OF THE ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF WILSON AVENUE BETWEEN ETIWANDA AVENUE AND EAST AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0225-083-01, 12, 13, 15, 16 AND 20, AND APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16072 FOR A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 358 LOTS ON APPROXIMATELY 150.8 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND VERY LOW (.1-2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS OF THE ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF WILSON AVENUE BETWEEN ETIWANDA AVENUE AND EAST AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0225-083-01, 12, 13, 15, 16 AND 20 MOTION: Moved by Kurth, seconded by Howdyshell to approve Resolution Nos. 04-204, 04-205 and 04- 206. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 725. City Council Minutes June 16, 2004 Page 12 ORDINANCE NO. 725 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2002-00156, A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETVVEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RICHLAND- PINEHURST, INC., FOR THE PURPOSE OF DEVELOPING AN APPROXIMATE 150.8 ACRE SITE WITH UP TO 358 RESIDENTIAL LOTS, FOR PROPERTIES GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF WILSON AVENUE BETWEEN ETIWANDA AVENUE AND EAST AVENUE- APN: 0225-083-01, 12, 13, 15, 16, AND 20 MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Williams to waive full reading and set second reading of Ordinance No. 725 for the July 7 meeting. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. A recess was taken at 9:23 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 9:34 p.m. with all Councilmembers present. G2. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND ANNEXATION DRC2003-00753 - HENDERSON CREEK PROPERTIES, LLC - A proposed Annexation of approximately 100 acres of land into the City of Rancho Cucamonga, located within the Efiwanda North Specific Plan at the northerly end of Wardman Bullock Road - APN: 0225-084-04, 0226-081-09 and 10, and 0226-082-28 and 29. (CONTINUED FROM JUNE 2, 2004) CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2003-00749 - HENDERSON CREEK PROPERTIES, LLC - A proposed General Plan Land Use Amendment from Very Low Residential (.1-2 dwelling units per acre) to Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) for 63.5 acres of land, located at the northerly end of Wardman Bullock Road - APN: 0225-084-04, 0226-081-09 and 10, and 0226-082-29. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC, PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2003-00750 - HENDERSON CREEK PROPERTIES, LLC, - A proposed Etiwanda North Specific Plan Amendment from Very Low Residential (.1-2 dwelling units per acre) to Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) for 63.5 acres of land and the proposed modification of the circulation system in the Etiwanda Highlands Neighborhood of the Specific Plan - APN: 0225-084-04, 0226-081-09 and 10, and 0226-082-29. CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT16324 - HENDERSON CREEK PROPERTIES, LLC, - The proposed subdivision of 63.5 acres into 123 lots for single-family development, within the Very-Low Residential District (.1-2 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, located at the northerly end of Wardman Bullock Road - APN: 0225-084-04, 0226-081-09 and 10, and 0226-082-29. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2003-00751 - HENDERSON CREEK PROPERTIES, LLC - A proposed Development Agreement to address specific conditions of development and annexation for 63.5 acres of land, located at the northerly end of Wardman Bullock Road within the Efiwanda North Specific Plan - APN: 0225-084-04, 0226-081- 09 and 10, and 0226-082-29. Staff report presented by Larry Henderson, Principal Planner. Councilmember Kurth asked if there would be issues with water and school. City Council Minutes June 16, 2004 Pagel$ Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, stated there are no issues with water and that they are trying to work with the school district for another school. He felt they will provide adequate schools. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council were: Lewis Burrelson stated he did not know where the students are going to go. He felt it would take years for a new school to get approved and be built. Mayor Alexander stated sometimes the City cannot help with some of these types of issues because it is up to the school board to handle this. He stated unfortunately the school districts sometimes wait until there is an impact before they do something. Mr. Burrelson stated he did not think a developer would develop this property under the County address and felt this would be a good deal for him if approved by the City. He felt there is a better alternative than annexing this into the City. Pam Steele, Hogle Ireland, stated they had been working with the County for three years and then two years ago started working with the City. She stated they have lowered the density a little for this project. She stated the lot average size will be 18,000 square feet. She felt this project will add to the value of the area and added they do have equestrian lots as well. Lori Corob stated she did not feel the City has helped them when there has been floods or other problems and that they still had to pay the taxes. She mentioned there have been schools that have opened and that they were not ready when they opened. She felt development should stop so that services can catch up to them. She stated traffic is also a concern to her. She felt the Council should look at this whole plan. Craig Sherman, Spirit of the Sage and Habitat Trust, stated they have submitted information, which is a part of the record. He felt the Council is piecemealing all of this, and did not feel the Council is planning for their community. He did not think the trees should be cut down and then turn around and plant new ones. He stated that is killing trees and he did not agree. Dr. Travis Longcore stated he has been retained by Mr. Sherman and that his comments from the previous item apply here as well. He did not feel the EIR's were consistent between this project and the previous one. He felt the Council should take the advice of the people that are experts in this area. Carol Douglas echoed her comments from the last item that she would rather see this built under the City than the County. She felt it was a well-planned community. Susan Hod, representing Henderson Creek, corrected comments made by Mr. Longcore. She added the Depadment of Fish and Game do not have a problem with the EIR. She stated she wanted this clarified for the record. She stated they do not have any trees on site as mentioned by Mr. Craig Sherman. Patricia Burrelson stated she is concerned about the traffic and felt there should be a different entrance other than just Wardman Bullock Road. She was concerned about the school impacts and the wildlife in this area. She hoped that the density does not change in this area. Mayor Alexander asked Ms. Burrelson why her children had to change schools, as she previously mentioned, and if she had talked to the school district. Ms. Burrelson stated the schools told her it is because there was so much development in the area. Coumcilmember Kurth inquired if there was another entrance into this project. Brad Bullet, City Planner, stated there are other ways to get in and out of this project. City Council Minutes June 16,2004 Page 14 Marcus Solomon stated he feels development is going faster than the City can accommodate. He asked if there is a way to hold off on this. He asked that the Council take care of these residents. There being no further input, the public hearing was closed. Councilmember Williams stated schools will never build until there is a need. She suggested these people go to the school board with these concerns. Councilmember Gutierrez stated this is a never-ending cycle. He commented on the schools and felt they were still rated very high in the City. James Markman, City Attorney, responded to Mr. Sherman's comments stating the State will not allow the City to control a project so there are adequate schools. He stated the school community gets fees when a development is built and the City does not. He stated the City cannot deny a project because of the school availability. He mentioned the University Crest project that was approved by the County under EIR and the City filed a lawsuit to arrest those projects because they were building out with density and grading standards that were far below anything Rancho Cucamonga would allow. He stated the County General Plan stated if you are building in a City Sphere of Influence you had to build to City standards. He stated once the lawsuit was filed, the County promptly, at the advice of County Counsel, got rid of that language without any environmental work whatsoever and just struck out any requirement to build to City standards. Then the City filed lawsuit number two challenging this change in the General Plan, which went all the way to the Court of Appeals. He stated the City won this case in the Court of Appeals, which stopped them from getting away from City standards. He stated this led to the process we are doing right now. He stated the City is not disingenuous as Mr. Sherman stated. He stated it is not fair to say these projects are being piecemealed. He stated these are being brought to the Council at one time so the Council knows the cumulative impacts. Councilmember Williams stated LAFCO encourages large projects, not piecemealing. Councilmember Kurth stated he felt the traffic needs to be worked on as a community and stated he realizes there are some issues with the schools. He stated the City is trying to solve these issues. He felt staff has done a good job. Mayor Alexander stated he knows everyone is not going to be happy, but the City will do its best. RESOLUTION NO. 04-207 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PREPARED FOR THE HENDERSON CREEK RESIDENTIAL PROJECT, WHICH INCLUDES ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 100 ACRES, A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT, ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16324, AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, FOR A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 63.5 ACRES INTO 123 LOTS FOR SINGLE-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT, WITHIN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (.1-2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT THE NORTHERLY END OF WARDMAN BULLOCK ROAD - APN: 0225-084-04, 0226-081-09 AND 10, AND 0226-082-29 City Council Minutes June 16, 2004 Page15 RESOLUTION NO. 04-208 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING INTENT TO PURSUE A CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION AND REQUESTING THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION TO INITIATE PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNEXATION OF PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTHERLY END OF WARDMAN BULLOCK ROAD AT THE INTERSECTION OF COLONBERO ROAD, AS DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A", DEPICTED IN EXHIBIT "B," AND OUTLINED IN EXHIBIT "C," THE PLAN OF SERVICES RESOLUTION NO. 04-209 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2003-00749, TO CHANGE THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL (.1-2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW RESIDENTIAL (2~4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 63.5 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED AT THE NORTHERLY END OF WARDMAN BULLOCK ROAD AT THE INTERSECTION OF COLONBERO ROAD; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0225-084-04, 0226-081-09 AND 10, AND 0226-082-29 RESOLUTION NO. 04-210 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16324 FOR A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 63.5 ACRES INTO 123 LOTS FOR SINGLE-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT, WITHIN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (.1-2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT THE NORTHERLY END OF WARDMAN BULLOCK ROAD; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 02251084-04, 0226-081-09 AND 10, AND 0226-082-29, AND APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16324 FOR A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 63.5 ACRES INTO 123 LOTS FOR SINGLE-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT, WITHIN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (.1-2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT THE NORTHERLY END OF WARDMAN BULLOCK ROAD; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0225-084-04, 0226-081-09 AND 10, AND 0226-082- 29 Motion: Moved by Williams, seconded by Gutierrez to approve Resolution Nos. 04-207, 04-208, 04-209 and 04-210. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 726. City Council Minutes June 16, 2004 Page 16 ORDINANCE NO. 726 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2003-00750, TO CHANGE THE DISTRICT DESIGNATION FROM VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL (.1-2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW RESIDENTIAL (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 63.5 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE NORTHERLY END OF WARDMAN BULLOCK ROAD AT THE INTERSECTION OF COLONBERO ROAD; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0225-084-04, 0226-081-09 AND 10, 0226-082-29 MOTION: Moved by Howdyshell, seconded by Williams to waive full reading and set second reading of Ordinance No. 726 for the July 7 meeting. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 727. ORDINANCE NO. 727 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY couNcIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2003-00751, A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND HENDERSON CREEK PROPERTIES, LLC, FOR THE PURPOSE OF DEVELOPING AN APPROXIMATE 65.3 ACRE SITE WITH UP TO 123 RESIDENTIAL LOTS, FOR PROPERTIES GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTHERLY END OF WARDMAN BULLOCK ROAD AT THE INTERSECTION OF COLONBERO ROAD - APN: 0225-084-04, 0226- 081-09 AND 10, AND 0226-082-29 MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Williams to waive full reading and set second reading of Ordinance No. 727 for the July 7 meeting. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. G3. CONSIDERATION OF ANNEXATION DRC2003-01164 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA-A proposed annexation of approximately 300 acres of land generally located north of Wilson Avenue between East Avenue and Wardman Bullock Road - APN: 0225-084~05, 06, 07, 08, and 09 and 0226- 081-05, 06, 07, 08, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2003- 01162 and Etiwanda North Specific Plan Amendment DRC2003-01163. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2003-01162 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A proposal to change the General Plan land use designation from Very Low Residential (.1-2 dwelling units per acre) to Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) for approximately 80 acres of land and from Very Low Residential (.1-2 dwelling units per acre) to Conservation for approximately 45 acres of land, generally located north of Wilson Avenue between East Avenue and Wardman Bullock Road - APN: 0225-084-08 (podion) and 09 and 0226-081-05, 06, 07, 08, 11, 12, and 13. The entire project area of approximately 300 acres is also referred to as the Etiwanda Creek Annexation. Related Files; Annexation DRC2003-01164, Etiwanda North Specific Plan Amendment DRC2003-01163. Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16072, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT14749, and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16324. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. City Council Minutes June 16, 2004 Page 17 CONSIDERATION OF ASSESSMENT AND ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2003-01163 - CITY OF: RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A.proposal to change the Etiwanda North Specific Plan land use designation from Very Low Residential (.1-2 dwelling units per acre) to Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) for approximately 80 acres and from Very Iow Residential (.1-2 dwelling units per acre) to Flood Control/Resource Conservation for approximately 45 acres of land, generally located north of Wilson Avenue between East Avenue and Wardman Bullock Road - APN: 0225-084-08 (portion) and 09 and 0226-082-05, 06, 07, 08, 11, 12, and 13. The entire project area of approximately 300 acres is also referred to as the Etiwanda Creek Annexation. Related Files: Annexation DRC2003-01164, General Plan Amendment DRC2003-01162, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16072, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT14749, and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16324. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Staff report presented by Larry Henderson, Principal Planner. Councilmember Gutierrez inquired if there is no developer, what is the reason for raising the density. Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, stated this will make it consistent with the adjacent land uses. Councilmember Gutierrez asked if more money is being made by there being more houses on a lot. Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, stated he did not know. Brad Buller, City Planner, added this density is being recommended because it is consistent with the neighborhood. Councilmember Williams talked about LAFCO's requirements when annexations are being done stating they do not like to leave a donut hole. Debra Meier, Centex Homes, informed the Council they will probably go less with the density than 2.5 units per acre. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council were: Craig Sherman, representing Habitat Trust and Spirit of the Sage, referred to documents he previously faxed and distributed this evening. He felt the impacts need to be evaluated. He did not agree with the argument that if this is built by the County it will not be done to City standards. He stated his comments from his letter are for the record, which is on file in the City Clerk's office. Dr. Travis Longcore talked about environmental issues and the biological resource impacts, which were included in the information he distributed and is on file in the City Clerk's office. Led CoreL stated the plan has changed from when she originally purchased her home. She asked the Council to let this area be. There being no further public input, the public hearing was closed. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he supports this, but will not support more than two units per acre. City Council Minutes June 16, 2004 Page 18 RESOLUTION NO. 04-211 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING INTENTION TO PURSUE A CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION AND REQUESTING THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION TO INITIATE PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF WILSON AVENUE BETWEEN EAST AVENUE AND WARDMAN BULLOCK ROAD AS DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A," DEPICTED IN EXHIBIT "B," AND OUTLINED IN EXHIBIT "C," THE PLAN OF SERVICES RESOLUTION NO. 04-212 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2003-01162, TO CHANGE THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL (.1-2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW RESIDENTIAL (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR APPROXIMATELY 80 ACRES OF LAND, AND FROM VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL (.1-2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO CONSERVATION FOR APPROXIMATELY 45 ACRES OF LAND, GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF WILSON AVENUE BETWEEN EAST AVENUE AND WARDMAN BULLOCK ROAD; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0225-084-08 (PORTION) AND 09 AND 0226-081-05, 06, 07, 08, 11, 12 AND 13 MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Gutierrez to approve Resolution Nos. 04-211 and 04-212. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 728. ORDINANCE NO. 728 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2003-01163, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE LAND DESIGNATION FROM VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL (.1-2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW RESIDENTIAL (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR APPROXIMATELY 80 ACRES AND FROM VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL (.1-2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO FLOOD CONTROL/RESOURCE CONSERVATION FOR APPROXIMATELY 45 ACRES OF LAND, GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF WILSON AVENUE BETWEEN EAST AVENUE AND WARDMAN BULLOCK ROAD; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0225-084-08 (PORTION) AND 09 AND 0226-081-05, 06, 07, 08, 11, 12 AND 13 MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Howdyshell to waive full reading and set second reading of Ordinance No. 726 for the July 7 meeting.. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. City Council Minutes June 16, 2004 Page 19 No Items Submitted. II I. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS I I1. CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL OF USE DETERMINATION DRC2004-00093 - STEVE KNECHT - An appeal of the Planning Commission's decision denying a request to determine that a dog breeding establishment with outside runs is similar to an animal care facility within the Very Low Residential District at 10158 Sun Valley-APN: 1074-081-12. (CONTINUED FROM JUNE 2, 2004) Staff report presented by Larry Henderson, Principal Planner. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public input. Addressing the City Council were: Joan Knecht informed the Council about their business. Councilmember Gutierrez asked what she defines as a kennel. Mr. Knecht stated five or more dogs. Brad Bullet, City Planner, stated there is a provision that you are not allowed to have more than three dogs. Nicole Myerchin asked that this proposal be denied because it would be setting a precedent. She stated there is a difference between a shelter and a breeding facility. She did not feel these people are complying with the law and that they have not tried to comply with the law until they were caught. She stated there are plenty of purebred retrievers that need homes. She did not feel these people should be granted special consideration. ' Steve Knecht stated they have purebred retrievers that are licensed. He stated people do want their dogs. He added they could not get a license because they have more than three dogs. Councilmember Gutierrez felt this facility is an animal care facility. He felt there was something to be said for a purebred animal, but felt these people are taking better care of these dogs than the animal shelter does. He did not feel these people are harming animals. He stated he would not classify this as "backyard breeding." He stated he would support their efforts in what they are doing. Councilmember Kurth asked for a definition of what the law says. James Markman, City Attorney, stated if the Council allows this use, they would need to add dog- breeding facilities approved to be put in this zone. He stated this is not, under any stretch of the legal imagination, going to be defined in a court of law as an animal care facility. He stated if the Council wants to approve this, he felt they should change the Ordinance. Mayor Alexander stated for their area, he cannot support what they are doing. He stated either the appeal has to be denied or they will have to change the Ordinance. Councilmember Williams stated she disagreed because they felt they could have a CUP. Mayor Alexander felt this would be setting a precedent by approving this. City Council Minutes June 16, 2004 Page 20 Councilmember Williams stated this CUP would have to be evaluated on the site. She felt there were more people that are breeding dogs than the City knows about and that they are also breaking the law. She stated she would support a CUP. Councilmember Gutierrez felt the language in the Ordinance needs to be cleaned up. He hated for these people to be the ones to set the example. He felt a CUP should be granted. Councilmember Kurth stated he doesn't think he can support this. He felt the law should be rewritten. Councilmember Howdyshell felt these people are trying to do what is right, but felt it should be denied because this does not support the law. He stated he would deny the appeal. RESOLUTION NO. 04-128 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, UPHOLDING THE ACTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND DENYING THE APPEAL OF USE DETERMINATION DRC2004-00093, BY DETERMINING THAT DOG BREEDING ESTABLISHMENTS WITH OUTSIDE RUNS ARE NOT SIMILAR TO AN ANIMAL CARE FACILITY WITHIN THE VERY LOW (.1-2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Kurth to approve Resolution No. 04-128. Councilmember Kurth felt the Planning Commission does a great job and felt the Council should support them. Councilmember Gutierrez felt these people need to know what their next step is. Mayor Alexander stated he is not in favor of Code Enforcement going out and shutting them down, but felt someone needs to go about changing the law. Councilmember Williams felt the Council should never be a rubber stamp of the Planning Commission. Councilmember Kudh felt once the rules are set, they need to be followed. Motion carried 3-2 (Gutierrez and Williams voted no). 12. APPROVAL OF A REVISED AGREEMENT WITH THE OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION (CO 92-015) THAT ENSURES RANCHO CUCAMONGA HOMEBOUND SENIORS ARE SERVED HOT MEAI,~ INSTEAD OF FROZEN MEALS AND THAT THE ANTICIPATED EXPANDED PARTICIPATION IN THF CENTRAL PARK CONGREGATE SENIOR LUNCH PROGRAM WILL ALSO BE ACCOMMODATED Staff report presented by Dave Moore, Recreation Superintendent. Councilmember Howdyshell asked what amount is collected for the meals. Dave Moore, Recreation Superintendent, stated $2.50 and that it is a donation. Councilmember Howdyshell asked if the people know the whole cost of the meal and felt they should be made aware of what the total cost is even though this is on a donation basis. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public input. Addressing the City Council was: Greg Alvarado, OIdtimers Foundation, thanked the Council for pursuing these issues for the seniors. He stated they are willing to meet the needs of the seniors. City Council Minutes June 16, 2004 Page 21 Councilmember Howdyshell thanked him for the services they provide to the seniors. Mr. Alvarado commented that the $2.50 is a donation. MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Kurth to approve CO 92-015 as revised. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. 01. APPOINTMENT OF T~NG HUYNH, BUILDING OFFICIAL, TO REPRESENT ~NCHO CUCAMONGA ON THE WEST VALLEY MOSQUITO AND VECTOR CONTROL DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS Staff repod presented by Jack Lam, City Manager. MOTION: Moved by Ku~h, seconded by Williams to approve the appointment of Trang Huynh to represent Rancho Cucamonga on the West Valley Mosquito and Vector Control District Board of Directors. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. J2. PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATF MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Howdyshell to receive and file the repod. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. J3. DISCUSSION ON REQUIREMENTS FOR SOLICITING IN THE CITY Staff repo~ presented by Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager. Councilmember Williams suggested that the requirements for solicitors be put on Channel 3. ACTION: Repo~ received and filed. J4. CONSIDERATION OF CITY COUNCIL COMMUNITY SERVICES SUB-COMMITTEE'S RECOMMENDATION TO FILL ~O VACANCIES ON THE PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION An oral repo~ was given by Councilmember Ku~h. MOTION: Moved by Howdyshell, seconded by Ku~h to reappoint Patricia Carlson and Ann Punter to the Park and Recreation Commission. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. II K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR THE NEXT MEETING I ~o Roms were idontifie~ for th~ noxt L. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS No communication was made from the public. City Council Minutes June 16, 2004 Page 22 il M, ADJOURNMENT I MOTION: Moved by Kurth, seconded by Williams to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 12:03 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: * CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 7/14/2004 through 7/26/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00212398 7/14/2004 A AND A AUTOMOTIVE 207.41 AP - 00212398 7/14/2004 A AND A AUTOMOTIVE 50.00 AP - 00212399 7/14/2004 AA EQUIPMENT 631.42 AP - 00212400 7/14/2004 ABC LOCKSMITHS 40.95 AP- 00212400 7/14/2004 ABC LOCKSMITHS 5.92 AP-00212400 7/14/2004 ABC LOCKSMITHS 987.08 AP- 00212400 7/14/2004 ABC LOCKSMITHS 82.50 AP-00212400 7/14/2004 ABC LOCKSMITHS 990.04 AP-00212400 7/14/2004 ABC LOCKSMITHS 380.00 AP- 00212400 7/14/2004 ABC LOCKSMITHS 90.58 AP 00212400 7/14/2004 ABC LOCKSMITHS : 3.23 AP 00212401 7/14/2004 ABDELKADER, INTISAR 1.00 AP 00212402 7/14/2004 ABLETRONICS 708.26 AP 00212402 7/14/2004 ABLETRONICS 18.94 AP 00212404 7/14/2004 ALL CITIES TOOLS 485.91 AP 00212405 7/14/2004 AMCOR PET PACKAGING 101.73 AP - 00212406 7/14/2004 AMERICAN CLASSIC SANITATION 69.70 AP - 00212406 7/14/2004 AMERICAN CLASSIC SANITATION 213.45 AP - 00212406 7/14/2004 AMERICAN CLASSIC SANITATION 155.40 AP- 00212406 7/14/2004 AMERICAN CLASSIC SANITATION 213.45 AP - 00212407 7/i4/2004 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 179.00 AP - 00212408 7/14/2004 ANCHETA, KlM 180.00 AP ~ 00212409 7/14/2004 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 5,000.00 AP - 00212409 7/14/2004 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 576.00 AP - 00212409 7/14/2004 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 888.00 AP - 00212409 7/14/2004 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 576.00 AP - 00212409 7/14/2004 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 3,000.00 AP - 00212409 7/14/2004 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 648.00 AP- 00212410 7/14/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 833.59 AP - 00212410 7/14/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 390.00 AP - 00212410 7/14/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 160.70 AP- 00212411 7/14/2004 ARTISTIC SIGNATURES 1,319.94 · AP- 00212411 7/14/2004 ARTISTIC SIGNATURES 99.03 AP- 00212411 7/14/2004 ARTISTIC SIGNATURES 164.96 AP-00212412 7/14/2004 ASSI SECURITY 325.00 AP- 00212412 7/14/2004 ASSI SECURITY 2,873.50 AP-00212412 7/14/2004 ASSI SECURITY 616.50 AP- 00212413 7/14/2004 ATHLETIC FIELD SPECIALISTS 18,500.00 AP - 00212414 7/14/2004 ATKINSON, STEFANI 40.00 AP - 00212414 7/14/2004 ATKINSON, STEFANI 49.00 AP- 00212415 7/14/2004 AUTO SPECIALISTS 120.00 AP - 00212416 7/14/2004 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 799.51 AP - 00212416 7/14/2004 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 477.19 AP - 00212416 7/14/2004 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 14.06 AP - 00212416 7/14/2004 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 36.74 AP - 00212416 7/14/2004 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 50.52 AP- 00212416 7/14/2004 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 32.85 AP - 00212416 7/14/2004 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 55.02 AP- 00212416 7/14/2004 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 147.53 AP- 00212416 7/14/2004 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 239.22 AP- 00212416 7/14/2004 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 48.50 AP - 00212416 7/14/2004 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 10.35 AP - 00212417 7/14/2004 BEARD PROVENCHER AND ASSOC 5,394.00 ~ User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 1 Current Date: 07/27/20¢ Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:25:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 7/14/2004 through 7/26/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00212417 7/14/2004 BEARD PROVENC}IER AND ASSOC 9,330.00 AP - 00212417 7/14/2004 BEARD PROVENCHER AND ASSOC 1,725.00 AP - 00212418 7/14/2004 BERNELL HYDRAULICS INC 905.78 AP- 00212418 7/14/2004 BERNELL HYDRAULICS INC 321.43 AP - 00212418 7/14/2004 BERNELL HYDRAULICS iNC 214.63 AP - 00212418 7/14/2004 BERNELL HYDRAULICS INC 302.50 AP - 00212418 7/14/2004 BERNELL HYDRAULICS INC 1,534.09 AP- 00212418 7/14/2004 BERNELLHYDRAULICS INC 238.81 AP - 00212419 7/14/2004 BOCTOR, ALFRED 40.00 AP- 00212420 7/14/2004 BONAFEDE, VICTORIA 85.00 AP- 00212421 7/14/2004 BOYLE ENGINEERING 2,175.40 AP - 00212422 7/14/2004 BRIDGES, DAN 90.00 AP- 00212423 7/14/2004 BRODARTBOOKS 4,057.17 AP - 00212423 7/14/2004 BRODART BOOKS 226.28 AP- 00212423 7/14/2004 BRODART BOOKS 4.87 AP- 00212423 7/14/2004 BRODART BOOKS 340.24 AP- 00212424 7/14/2004 BROWN, P.J. 1.00 AP - 00212425 7/14/2004 BRYAN, ALAN 30.00 AP - 00212427 7/14/2004 CALIFORNIA PARK & RECREATION SOCIETY 55.00 AP - 00212428 7/14/2004 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 114.79 AP - 00212428 7/14/2004 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 24.62 AP - 00212428 7/14/2004 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF -2,456.00 AP - 00212428 7/14/2004 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 663.54 AP - 00212428 7/14/2004 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 1,649.74 AP - 00212428 7/14/2004 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 21.59 AP - 00212429 7/14/2004 CALLAHAN, MICHAEL 40.00 AP- 00212430 7/14/2004 CAMPOS, MARTHA 16.05 AP- 00212431 7/14/2004 CAO, MICHAEL 3.75 AP - 00212432 7/14/2004 CARDENAS, NANCY 200.00 AP - 00212433 7/14/2004 CARRASCO, ELAINE 16.00 AP - 00212434 7/14/2004 CARREON, ELIZABETH 49.00 AP - 00212435 7/14/2004 CDW GOVERNMENT 1NC. 59,100.88 AP- 00212436 7/14/2004 CENTRAL CITIES SIGNS INC 161.38 AP - 00212437 7/14/2004 CHACON, LORENA 66.00 AP - 00212438 7/14/2004 CHAMPION AWARDS AND SPECIALIES 1,456.24 AP- 00212439 7/14/2004 CIVIC SOLUTIONS INC 13,280.00 AP - 00212439 7/14/2004 CIVIC SOLUTIONS INC 400.00 AP - 00212440 7/14/2004 CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. 878.51 AP - 00212440 7/14/2004 CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. 903.02 AP - 00212440 7/14/2004 CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. 450.03 AP - 00212441 7/14/2004 CLAIJSEN, PATRICIA 45.00 AP - 00212442 7/14/2004 CLAYTON GROUP SERVICES INC 1,440.13 AP - 00212443 7/14/2004 COASTAL BUILDING SERVICES INC 16,438.00 AP - 00212444 7/14/2004 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 105.52 AP - 00212444 7/14/2004 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 17.38 AP - 00212444 7/14/2004 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 187.89 AP - 00212445 7/14/2004 CONCENTRA MEDICAL CENTERS 2,965.49 AP - 00212445 7/14/2004 CONCENTRA MEDICAL CENTERS 99.27 AP - 00212445 7/14/2004 CONCENTRA MEDICAL CENTERS 83.35 AP - 00212445 7/14/2004 CONCENTRA MEDICAL CENTERS 58.68 AP - 00212445 7/14/2004 CONCENTRA MEDICAL CENTERS 91.15 AP - 00212445 7/14/2004 CONCENTRA MEDICAL CENTERS 59.29 AP- 00212445 7/14/2004 CONCENTRA MEDICAL CENTERS 91.15 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 2 Current Date: 07/27/20C Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:25:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 7/14/2004 through 7/26/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00212445 7/14/2004 CONCENTRA MEDICAL CENTERS 80.63 AP - 00212445 7/14/2004 CONCENTRA IVIEDICAL CENTERS 11.69 AP - 00212445 7/14/2004 CONCENTRA MEDICAL CENTERS 47.60 AP - 00212445 7/14/2004 CONCENTRA MEDICAL CENTERS 25.00 AP - 00212445 7/14/2004 CONCENTRA MEDICAL CENTERS 1,278.00 AP - 00212445 7/14/2004 CONCENTRA MEDICAL CENTERS 149.39 AP ~ 00212445 7/t4/2004 CONCENTRA MEDICAL CENTERS 80.63 AP 00212446 7/14/2004 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS ] 65.73 AP 00212447 7/14/2004 COPP CRUSHING CORP, DAN 20.00 AP 00212448 7/14/2004 COUNTRY ESTATE FENCE CO 1NC 1,160.64 AP 00212448 7/14/2004 COUNTRY ESTATE FENCE CO INC 1,701.00 AP 00212451 7/14/2004 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 3,655.00 AP 00212452 7/14/2004 DAVIES INC, ALBERT 26,229.56 AP 00212452 7/14/2004 DAVIES INC, ALBERT 26,229.56 AP - 00212453 7/14/2004 DE LOS REYES, MARILOU 200.00 AP - 00212454 7/14/2004 DEER CREEK CAR CARE CENTER 1,750.00 AP- 00212455 7/14/2004 DEL MECHANICAL 166.25 AP- 00212455 7/14/2004 DEL MECHANICAL 825.48 AP - 00212455 7/14/2004 DEL MECHANICAL 117.50 AP - 00212456 7/14/2004 DELTA MICROIMAGING INC 527.03 AP - 00212458 7/14/2004 DIETERICH INTERNATIONAL TRUCK 44.83 AP - 00212458 7/14/2004 DIETERICH INTERNATIONAL TRUCK 44.83 AP - 00212459 7/14/2004 DIETERICH POST COMPANY 512.95 AP - 00212460 7/14/2004 DRIVER ALLIANT SPECIAL EVENTS 510.04 AP - 00212461 7/14/2004 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 53.06 AP - 00212461 7/14/2004 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 249.20 AP- 00212462 7/14/2004 DURA ART STONE 597.91 AP - 00212464 7/14/2004 DUROUSSEAIJ, STEVE 45.00 AP - 00212465 7/14/2004 DYNASTY SCREEN PRINTING 177.25 AP- 00212467 7/14/2004 EMCOR SERVICE 8,325.00 AP- 00212467 7/14/2004 EMCOR SERVICE 1,633.09 AP - 00212467 7/14/2004 EMCOR SERVICE 3,248.66 AP- 00212467 7/14/2004 EMCOR SERVICE 8,325.00 AP - 00212468 7/14/2004 EN POINTE TECHNOLOGIES 2,156.08 AP - 00212468 7/14/2004 EN POINTE TECHNOLOGIES 180.00 AP- 00212469 7/14/2004 ESPINO'S COP SHOP INC 286.16 AP - 00212469 7/14/2004 ESPINO'S COP SHOP 1NC 90.00 AP - 00212470 7/14/2004 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 185.93 AP- 00212471 7/14/2004 F S MOTOR SPORTS INC 75.00 AP - 00212471 7/14/2004 F S MOTOR SPORTS INC 185.00 AP - 00212472 7/14/2004 FARMER, STEPHANIE 64.00 AP- 00212473 7/14/2004 FAROOQ, NIKKI 100.00 AP - 00212474 7/14/2004 FARR, GERI 30.00 AP - 00212475 7/14/2004 FAUST PRINTING INC 1,285.46 AP - 00212476 7/14/2004 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 5.50 AP - 00212476 7/14/2004 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 5.50 AP - 00212477 7/14/2004 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 486.00 AP - 00212477 7/14/2004 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 331.69 AP - 00212477 7/14/2004 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 486.00 AP - 00212477 7/14/2004 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 868.00 AP - 00212477 7/14/2004 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 868.00 AP - 00212477 7/14/2004 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 846.30 AP - 00212477 7/14/2004 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 348.00 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 3 Current Date: 07/27/20E Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:25:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 7/14/2004 through 7/26/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00212477 7/14/2004 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 486.00 AP - 00212477 7/14/2004 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 331.69 AP - 00212478 7/14/2004 FISHER SCIENTII~IC 55.08 AP ~ 00212480 7/t4/2004 FORT, TODD OR CORTLAND 81.00 AP - 00212482 7/14/2004 GAINES, SANDRA 65.00 AP - 00212483 7/14/2004 GARCIA, VANESSA 40.00 AP - 00212484 7/14/2004 GAY AND SUNRISE RENT A CAR, LORIANNE 218.85 AP ~ 00212486 7/14/2004 GEOGRAPHICS 3,942.57 AP - 00212487 7/14/2004 GERSTENACKER, CARLOS 90.00 AP - 00212488 7/14/2004 GIANT INLAND EMPIRE RV CENTER 54.77 AP - 00212490 7/14/2004 GONZALES, CARLOS 150.00 AP - 00212491 7/14/2004 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 166.08 AP - 00212491 7/14/2004 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 84.66 AP - 00212491 7/14/2004 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 83.26 AP - 00212491 7/14/2004 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 92.72 AP - 00212491 7/14/2004 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 117.78 AP- 00212492 7/14/2004 GTSI CORP 2,971.31 AP 00212493 7/14/2004 GUEVARA, YESENIA 8.50 AP 00212494 7/14/2004 HAZEGH, MASSIE 16.00 AP 00212495 7/14/2004 HEIL, MARY 47.00 AP 00212496 7/14/2004 HERTZ EQUIP RENTAL 202.53 AP 00212496 7/14/2004 HERTZ EQUIP RENTAL 1,734.19 AP 00212496 7/14/2004 HERTZ EQUIP RENTAL 776.83 AP 00212496 7/14/2004 HERTZ EQUIP RENTAL 1,037.01 AP 00212496 7/14/2004 HERTZ EQUIP RENTAL 260.18 AP - 00212496 7/14/2004 HERTZ EQUIP RENTAL 2,239.82 AP- 00212497 7/14/2004 HIGHLAND, DARCY 62.00 AP - 00212498 7/14/2004 HOFFMAN, ANITA 90.00 AP - 00212499 7/14/2004 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 135.00 AP - 00212499 7/14/2004 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 260.49 AP - 00212499 7/14/2004 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO/NC 49.03 AP - 00212499 7/14/2004 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 33.09 AP- 00212499 7/14/2004 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 109.91 AP - 00212499 7/14/2004 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 291.47 AP - 00212499 7/14/2004 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 205.53 AP - 00212499 7/14/2004 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 90.00 AP - 00212499 7/14/2004 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 49.03 AP- 00212499 7/14/2004 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 281.82 AP- 00212499 7/14/2004 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 439.91 AP- 00212499 7/14/2004 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 277.72 AP - 00212500 7/14/2004 HOLT'S AUTO ELECTRIC INC 350.19 AP- 00212501 7/i4/2004 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 4.31 AP - 00212501 7/14/2004 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 171.72 AP- 00212502 7/14/2004 HONORE, ELSA 11.50 AP- 00212503 7/14/2004 HOSE MAN INC 116.99 AP- 00212503 7/14/2004 HOSE MAN INC 18.06 AP- 00212503 7/14/2004 HOSE MAN INC 129.80 AP- 00212503 7/14/2004 HOSE MAN INC 65.29 AP- 00212504 7/14/2004 HOYT LUMBER CO., SM 231.68 AP - 00212504 7/14/2004 HOYT LUMBER CO., SM 993.22 AP- 00212504 7/14/2004 HOYT LUMBER CO., SM 331.54 AP- 00212505 7/14/2004 HULS ENVIRONMENTAL MGT LLC 6,998.75 tr. AP - 00212507 7/14/2004 HUNTINGTON HARDWARE 416.86 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 4 Current Date: 07/27/20t2 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:25:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 7/14/2004 through 7/26/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00212508 7/14/2004 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 328.55 AP - 00212508 7/14/2004 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 208.61 AP - 00212509 7/14/2004 INLAND VALLEY APPRAISERS 125.00 AP - 00212510 7/14/2004 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 193.20 AP - 00212510 7/14/2004 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 300.15 AP - 00212511 7/14/2004 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 244.22 AP- 00212513 7/14/2004 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 353.22 AP - 00212513 7/14/2004 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 20.69 AP - 00212514 7/14/2004 INTRAVAIA ROCK AND SAND 803.66 AP- 00212514 7/14/2004 INTRAVAIA ROCK AND SAND 129.30 AP- 00212515 7/14/2004 ISA, JACKIE 60.00 AP- 00212516 7/14/2004 IZQUIERDA, CONNIE 38.15 AP- 00212517 7/14/2004 J D C INC 90,093.00 AP- 00212517 7/14/2004 J D C INC -9,009.30 AP- 00212518 7/14/2004 JOHNSON POWER SYSTEMS 15,688.53 AP- 00212519 7/14/2004 JONES, DEBORAH 60.00 AP- 00212520 7/14/2004 JUAREZ, GUS R 90.00 AP - 00212521 7/14/2004 KERREY CONSULTING, IULES 350.00 AP - 00212521 7/1412004 KERREY CONSULTING, JULES 560.00 AP - 00212521 7/14/2004 KERREY CONSULTING, JULES 210.00 AP - 00212522 7/14/2004 KLEINFELDER INC 1,679.50 AP - 00212524 7/14/2004 KOCH MATERIALS COMPANY 128.06 AP - 00212525 7/14/2004 LILBURN CORPORATION 8,584.41 AP - 00212525 7/14/2004 LILBURN CORPORATION 80.09 AP - 00212526 7/14/2004 LOS ANGELES FREIGHTLINER 149.55 AP - 00212526 7/14/2004 LOS ANGELES FREIGHTLINER 92.33 AP - 00212527 7/14/2004 LOWE'S COMPANIES INC. 169.17 AP - 00212527 7/14/2004 LOWE'S COMPANIES INC. 27.56 AP- 00212527 7/14/2004 LOWE'S COMPANIES INC. 215.34 AP - 00212527 7/14/2004 LOWE'S COMPANIES INC. 118.05 AP - 00212527 7/14/2004 LOWE'S COMPANIES INC. 76.98 AP- 00212528 7/14/2004 M & M BOYS SUPPLY 1,063.58 AP - 00212529 7/14/2004 MARK CHRIS INC 38.90 AP - 00212529 7/14/2004 MARK CHRIS 1NC 61.42 AP - 00212530 7/14/2004 MARTIN AND CHAPMAN CO 53.49 AP - 00212530 7/14/2004 MARTIN AND CHAPMAN CO 21.16 AP - 00212531 7/14/2004 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 209.91 AP - 00212532 7/14/2004 MCMASTER, MARIAN 40.00 AP - 00212534 7/14/2004 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 32.50 AP - 00212535 7/14/2004 MOBILE MODULAR MANAGEMENT CORP 4,917.73 AP - 00212536 7/14/2004 MORENO, LISA 65.00 AP - 00212537 7/14/2004 MOUNTAIN VIEW EM PHYS MEDICAL GROUP I 110.00 AP - 00212538 7/14/2004 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 9.69 AP - 00212539 7/14/2004 MUNAR, ANDRE 42.87 AP - 00212540 7/14/2004 NAPA AUTO PARTS 9.75 AP - 00212540 7/14/2004 NAPA AUTO PARTS 33.1! AP - 00212540 7/14/2004 NAPA AUTO PARTS 28.90 AP- 00212540 7/14/2004 NAPA AUTO PARTS 118.78 AP - 00212542 7/14/2004 NATIONS RENT 36.93 AP - 00212543 7/14/2004 NEC BUSINESS NETWORK SOLUTIONS INC 1,041.65 AP - 00212543 7/14/2004 NEC BUSINESS NETWORK SOLUTIONS/NC 1,050.00 AP - 00212544 7/14/2004 NESTOR TRAFFIC SYSTEMS 33,840.00 ,~, AP - 00212545 7/14/2004 NIKPOUR, MOHAM1VIED 30.00 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 5 Current Date: 07/27/2012 Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:25:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 7/14/2004 through 7/26/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00212546 7/14/2004 NIXON EGLI EQUIPMENT CO 148.92 AP - 00212547 7/14/2004 NJUGUNA, SAMMY 90.00 AP - 00212548 7/14/2004 O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC 33.40 AP - 00212548 7/14/2004 O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC 228.25 AP- 00212548 7/14/2004 O C B REPROGRAPHICS iNC 712.14 AP - 00212548 7/14/2004 O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC 35.19 AP - 00212548 7/14/2004 O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC 227.62 AP- 00212548 7/14/2004 O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC 37.71 AP - 00212548 7/14/2004 O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC 485.09 AP - 00212548 7/14/2004 O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC 118.53 AP- 00212548 7/14/2004 O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC 477.71 AP - 00212549 7/14/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 899.94 AP- 00212549 7/14/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 161.79 AP - 00212549 7/14/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 8.65 AP ~ 00212549 7/14/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 178.21 AP - 00212549 7/14/2004 Ob-FICE DEPOT 54.14 AP - 00212549 7/14/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 762.00 AP- 00212549 7/14/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 34.84 AP- 00212549 7/14/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 907.17 AP-00212549 7/14/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 28.53 AP - 00212549 7/14/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 47.20 AP - 00212549 7/14/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 9.07 AP - 00212549 7/14/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 1,332.74 AP - 00212550 7/14/2004 OFFICE MAX 59.21 AP- 00212550 7/14/2004 OFFICEMAX -10.83 AP - 00212551 7/14/2004 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 64.29 AP - 00212551 7/14/2004 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 1.93 AP - 00212551 7/14/2004 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 116.47 AP - 00212551 7/14/2004 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 43.60 AP - 00212551 7/14/2004 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 198.15 AP - 00212551 7/14/2004 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 21.10 AP - 00212551 7/14/2004 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 269.29 AP - 00212551 7/14/2004 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 229.16 AP - 00212551 7/14/2004 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 319.93 AP - 00212551 7/14/2004 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 133.55 AP - 00212551 7/14/2004 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 78.61 AP - 00212551 7/14/2004 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 19.28 AP - 00212552 7/14/2004 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 842.05 AP- 00212553 7/14/2004 OWEN ELECTRIC 191.73 AP- 00212553 7/14/2004 OWEN ELECTRIC 119.41 AP- 00212553 7/14/2004 OWEN ELECTRIC 7,469.96 AP- 00212553 7/14/2004 OWEN ELECTRIC 86.89 AP-00212553 7/14/2004 OWEN ELECTRIC 4,150.36 AP- 00212555 7/14/2004 PERVO PAINT CO 880.32 AP - 00212556 7/14/2004 PHASE II SYSTEMS 3,500.00 AP - 00212557 7/14/2004 PHOTOGRAPHY BY KENNETH 35.00 AP- 00212558 7/14/2004 PIZTOLA, PETE 90.00 AP - 00212560 7/14/2004 POUK AND STEINLE INC. 373,869.06 AP - 00212561 7/14/2004 POURHASSANIAN, ABBY 200.00 AP - 00212562 7/14/2004 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION INC 378.55 AP- 00212562 7/14/2004 PRAXA1R DISTRIBUTION INC 98.88 AP - 00212566 7/14/2004 Q-STAR TECHNOLOGY LLC 9,882.97 AP - 00212568 7/14/2004 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 63.55 ~ User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 6 Current Date: 07/27/20C Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:25:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 7/14/2004 through 7/26/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00212568 7/14/2004 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 52.68 AP - 00212568 7/14/2004 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 390.70 AP - 00212568 7/14/2004 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 476.59 AP- 00212568 7/14/2004 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 1,261.98 AP- 00212568 7/14/2004 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 360.94 AP - 00212569 7/14/2004 RAGHAVAN, GIRIJA 52.00 AP - 00212570 7/14/2004 RAIN FOR RENT RIVERSIDE 3,709.88 AP- 00212571 7/14/2004 RAMIREZ, SYLVIA 85.00 AP - 00212572 7/14/2004 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FAMILY YMCA 500.00 AP - 00212572 7/14/2004 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FAMILY YMCA 1,250.00 AP- 00212575 7/14/2004 REXEL CALCON 28.30 AP- 00212575 7/14/2004 REXEL CALCON 116.93 AP- 00212577 7/14/2004 RISING STARS 557.00 AP 00212578 7/14/2004 RISTWAY, CANDACE 90.00 AP 00212578 7/14/2004 RISTWAY, CANDACE 150.00 AP 00212579 7/14/2004 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 124.45 AP 00212581 7/t4/2004 ROBERT HALF TECHNOLOGY 1,056.00 AP 00212581 7/14/2004 ROBERT HALF TECHNOLOGY 1,056.00 AP 00212582 7/14/2004 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 70.00 AP 00212582 7/14/2004 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 116.00 AP - 00212582 7/14/2004 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 85.00 AP - 00212582 7/14/2004 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 85.00 AP - 00212582 7/14/2004 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 85.00 AP- 00212582 7/14/2004 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 85.00 AP- 00212583 7/14/2004 RODRIGUEZ, CLAUDIA 39.00 AP- 00212583 7/14/2004 RODRIGUEZ, CLAUDIA 5.45 AP- 00212584 7/14/2004 ROHDE, ROSEMARIE 54.00 AP- 00212585 7/14/2004 ROTARY CORPORATION 122.32 AP- 00212585 7/14/2004 ROTARY CORPORATION 335.33 AP - 00212586 7/14/2004 ROWSON, ALAN 49.00 AP - 00212587 7/14/2004 SAN BERNARDINO CO FIRE DEPT 739.72 AP - 00212587 7/14/2004 SAN BERNARDINO CO FIRE DEPT 1,123.94 AP - 00212587 7/14/2004 SAN BERNARDINO CO FIRE DEPT 1,049.16 AP - 00212588 7/14/2004 SAN BERNARD1NO COUNTY 472.55 AP - 00212588 7/14/2004 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 325.90 AP - 00212589 7/14/2004 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 1,922.24 AP - 00212590 7/14/2004 SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM CO INC 293.06 AP - 00212591 7/14/2004 SCHALLER, DOUG 44.00 AP - 00212592 7/1412004. SCHNEIDERS, SUZANNE 150.00 AP - 00212593 7/14/2004 SERAFINI SMITH, CECILIA 56.00 AP - 00212595 7/14/2004 SHAMKANI, CANDACE 67.00 AP- 00212596 7/14/2004 SHEA CO INC, J.F. 937.50 AP-00212598 7/14/2004 SMIDERLE BEA 31.54 AP- 00212598 7/14/2004 SMIDERLE BEA 17.41 AP- 00212598 7/14/2004 SMIDERLE BEA 10.76 AP- 00212598 7/14/2004 SMIDERLE BEA 9.64 AP-00212598 7/14/2004 SMIDERLE BEA 10.98 AP-00212598 7/14/2004 SMIDERLE BEA 20.00 AP - 00212598 7/14/2004 SMIDERLE BEA 20.00 AP - 00212598 7/14/2004 SMIDERLE BEA 10.00 AP- 00212598 7/14/2004 SMIDERLE BEA 7.43 AP - 00212599 7/14/2004 SMITH, JENNIFER 40.00 AP - 00212600 7/14/2004 SMOKE DETECTORS, THE 1,500.00 / User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 7 Current Date: 07/27/20¢ Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:25:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 7/14/2004 through 7/26/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00212600 7/14/2004 SMOKE DETECTORS, THE 250.00 AP - 00212601 7/14/2004 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 184.30 AP - 00212601 7/14/2004 SO CAL1F GAS COMPANY 1,915.35 AP- 00212601 7/14/2004 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 172.54 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,859.83 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.78 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.66 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 5,365.12 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 623.95 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTI-IERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 78.11 AP - 00212606 711412004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 55.94 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.92 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.35 AP- 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAEDISON 105.71 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.74 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.76 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.97 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.36 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.35 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.33 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.63 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.76 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.76 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.05 AP- 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP- 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.19 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 70.59 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 33.59 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 100.83 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 117.03 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.36 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.27 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 78.00 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 57.46 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.47 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 94.75 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 127.34 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 95.33 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.04 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.76 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.19 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.82 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 88.98 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.76 AP- 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 101.14 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.03 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.49 AP- 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.33 ~ User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 8 Current Date: 07/27/20¢ Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:25:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 7/14/2004 through 7/26/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 62.09 AP - 00212606 7/1412004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 143.13 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.24 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.92 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 61.48 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.19 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP- 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.62 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.36 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.53 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.53 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 39.17 AP- 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.57 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.19 AP- 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.34 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 35.32 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.03 AP- 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 81.25 AP- 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.76 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 7.09 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 47.20 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.74 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.76 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 139.30 AP 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.91 AP 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 137,89 AP 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21,58 AP 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 44.98 AP 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.12 AP 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 5,701,25 AP 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 71.94 AP 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 115,92 AP 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.32 AP 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERNCALIFORNIAEDISON 126.22 AP 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.19 AP 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 80,44 AP 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 56,24 AP 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.76 AP 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERNCALIFORNIAEDISON 12.47 AP 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.19 AP 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.19 AP 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.19 AP 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.76 AP 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.35 AP 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 70.77 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 68.33 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2.03 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 85.70 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.37 ,,~ AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 11.20 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 9 Current Date: 07/27/20¢ Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:25:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 7/14/2004 through 7/26/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.34 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.17 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 47.56 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.92 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 89.22 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.76 AP 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.33 AP 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.20 AP 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.28 AP 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.20 AP 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 134.84 AP 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.76 AP 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.17 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTI-IFRN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.76 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHJ~RN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.03 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.34 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 79.33 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 38.80 AP- 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,875.92 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.77 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 111.18 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 8,060.40 AP- 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,019.87 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,110.38 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 61.23 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.57 AP- 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.05 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.12 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.04 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 121.47 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 46.19 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 117.43 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.48 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 63.22 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 32.19 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.77 AP - 00212606 7/t4/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.19 AP- 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.19 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.76 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 39.21 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 65.55 AP- 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 198.68 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 135.49 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 187.31 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 27.17 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTI-IERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 61.23 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 275.30 AP- 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 6,813.83 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.79 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.05 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.19 L~ User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 10 Current Date: 07/27/20C Report:CK_AGENDA PEG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:25:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 7/14/2004 through 7/26/2004 Cheek No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 113.37 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.19 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 141.20 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 38.99 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.04 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 106.97 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.19 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 58.02 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 59.38 AP 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 29.00 AP 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.19 AP 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTI-IERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP - 00212606 711412004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 54.05 AP - 00212606 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.50 AP - 00212607 7/14/2004 SOUTHLAND SPORTS OFFICIALS 332.00 AP - 00212610 7/1412004 STANTON, REGINA 56.00 AP - 00212611 7/14/2004 STERLING COI~I~EE SERVICE 364.33 AP- 00212612 7/14/2004 STEWART, DEBRA 40.00 AP - 00212613 7/14/2004 STOCKWELL, KATI-[LEEN 10.00 AP- 00212614 7/14/2004 SUMMERS, KIMBERLY 69.60 AP - 00212615 7/14/2004 SUMMIT TRAINING SOURCE INC 900.00 AP- 00212616 7/1412004 SUNRISE FORD 6.83 AP-00212616 7/14/2004 SUNRISE FORD 27.24 AP- 00212616 7/14/2004 SUNRISE FORD 598.29 AP- 00212617 7/14/2004 T AND D INSTALLATIONS 219.88 AP- 00212617 7/14/2004 T AND D INSTALLATIONS 163.64 AP - 00212617 7/14/2004 T AND D INSTALLATIONS 32.34 AP - 00212617 7/t4/2004 T AND D INSTALLATIONS 62.03 AP- 00212617 7/14/2004 T AND D INSTALLATIONS 68.61 AP- 00212617 7/14/2004 T AND D INSTALLATIONS 161.89 AP- 00212617 7/14/2004 T AND D INSTALLATIONS 56.12 AP- 00212617 7/14/2004 T AND D INSTALLATIONS 183.25 AP - 00212617 7/14/2004 T AND D INSTALLATIONS 346.54 AP- 00212617 7/14/2004 T AND D INSTALLATIONS 90.34 AP - 00212618 7/14/2004 TAUSSIG AND ASSOCIATES INC, DAVID 516.25 AP - 00212620 7/14/2004 TESTERO, GABY 52.00 AP-00212621 7/14/2004 TRAFFIC SPECIALTIES 156.78 AP - 00212622 7/14/2004 TRAINING NETWORK, THE 464.70 AP - 00212625 7/14/2004 UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION 160.00 AP- 00212625 7/14/2004 UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION 3,215.00 AP- 00212625 7/14/2004 UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION 396.00 AP - 00212626 7/14/2004 UN1FIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 51.21 AP - 00212626 7/14/2004 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 26.69 AP- 00212626 7/14/2004 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 51.21 AP- 00212626 7/i4/2004 UNII~IRST UNIFORM SERVICE 551.18 AP- 00212626 7/14/2004 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 36.99 1] User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 11 Current Date: 07/27/20¢ Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:25:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 7/14/2004 through 7/26/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00212626 7/14/2004 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 587.36 AP - 00212626 7/14/2004 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 51.21 AP - 00212626 7/14/2004 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 23.56 AP - 00212626 7/14/2004 UN1FIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 87.31 AP - 00212626 7/14/2004 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 36.99 AP - 00212626 7/14/2004 UNIF1RST UNIFORM SERVICE 110.66 AP - 00212626 7/14/2004 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 634.91 AP - 00212626 7/14/2004 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 23.56 AP - 00212626 7/14/2004 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 107.32 AP - 00212626 7/14/2004 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 107.32 AP- 00212627 7/14/2004 UPS 21.60 AP- 00212627 7/14/2004 UPS 25.64 AP- 00212627 7/14/2004 UPS 30.36 AP-00212627 7/14/2004 UPS 21.09 AP - 00212628 7/14/2004 VALDEZ, STEPHANIE 34.00 AP - 00212629 7/14/2004 VALLEY ROOTER AND PLUMBING REPAIR 600.00 AP- 00212631 7/14/2004 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 5,618.84 AP- 00212632 7/14/2004 VERIZON 59.69 AP- 00212632 7/14/2004 VERIZON 28.88 AP - 00212632 7/14/2004 VERIZON 20.41 AP - 00212632 7/14/2004 VERIZON 20.41 AP- 00212632 7/14/2004 VERIZON 27.56 AP-00212632 7/14/2004 VERIZON 20.41 AP - 00212632 7/14/2004 VERIZON 30.82 AP-00212632 7/14/2004 VERIZON 28.88 AP-00212632 7/14/2004 VERIZON 27.91 AP- 00212632 7/14/2004 VERIZON 20.41 AP-00212632 7/14/2004 VERIZON 20.41 AP- 00212632 7/14/2004 VERIZON 37.71 AP- 00212632 7/14/2004 VERIZON 61.71 AP - 00212632 7/14/2004 VERIZON 60.42 AP - 00212632 7/14/2004 VERIZON 28.88 AP- 00212632 7/14/2004 VERIZON 116.43 AP-00212632 7/14/2004 VERIZON 20.75 AP-00212632 7/14/2004 VERIZON 27.91 AP-00212632 7/14/2004 VERIZON 27.91 AP - 00212632 7/14/2004 VERIZON 20.41 AP- 00212632 7/14/2004 VERIZON 20.41 AP- 00212632 7/14/2004 VERIZON 20.44 AP- 00212632 7/14/2004 VERIZON 28.92 AP - 00212633 7/14/2004 VOGEL, ROCHELLE 40.00 AP - 00212634 7/14/2004 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO -160.05 AP - 00212634 7/14/2004 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 571.08 AP - 00212634 7/14/2004 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 96.95 AP - 00212634 7/14/2004 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 493.69 AP - 00212634 7/14/2004 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 456.41 AP - 00212634 7/14/2004 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 45.18 AP- 00212635 7/14/2004 WATSON, CHRISTINE 45.00 AP - 00212636 7/14/2004 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 56.00 AP - 00212636 7/14/2004 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 7,682.22 AP - 00212636 7/14/2004 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 517.20 AP - 00212636 7/14/2004 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 134.38 AP - 00212636 7/14/2004 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 11.35 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 12 Current Date: 07/27/2012 Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:25:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 7/14/2004 through 7/26/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00212636 7/14/2004 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 948.54 AP - 00212636 7/14/2004 WAXlE SANITARY SUPPLY 910.46 AP - 00212636 7/14/2004 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 213.09 AP - 00212636 7/14/2004 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 1,011.49 AP - 00212636 7/14/2004 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 25.08 AP - 00212636 7/14/2004 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 749.25 AP- 00212636 7/14/2004 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 768.63 AP - 00212636 7/14/2004 WAXYE SANITARY SUPPLY 65.06 AP - 00212636 7/14/2004 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 429.97 AP- 00212636 7/14/2004 WAXiE SANITARY SUPPLY 314.91 AP - 00212636 7/14/2004 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 225.51 AP- 00212637 7/14/2004 WEIHERT, LENEE 51.50 AP - 00212638 7/14/2004 WEST END MATERIAL SUPPLY 23.77 AP- 00212639 7/14/2004 WHITE CAP CONST SUPPLY 65.06 AP - 00212640 7/14/2004 WHITLEY, SAMANTHA 44.00 AP- 00212641 7/14/2004 WIDJAJA, SULISTIAWATI 128.00 AP- 00212642 7/14/2004 WILSON AND BELL 81.56 AP - 00212642 7/14/2004 WILSON AND BELL 422.93 AP- 00212642 7/14/2004 WILSON AND BELL 364.50 AP - 00212642 7/14/2004 WILSON AND BELL 405.49 AP- 00212642 7/14/2004 WILSON AND BELL 89.67 AP - 00212642 7/14/2004 WILSON AND BELL 434.05 AP- 00212642 7/14/2004 WILSON AND BELL 562.88 AP- 00212642 7/14/2004 WILSON AND BELL 361.82 AP- 00212642 7/14/2004 WILSON AND BELL 393.70 AP - 00212642 7/14/2004 WILSON AND BELL 248.32 AP- 00212643 7/14/2004 WITZEL, LORETTA 98.00 AP - 00212646 7/14/2004 YAZELL, MONICA 39.00 AP - 00212647 7/14/2004 YEE, LARRY 58.00 AP - 00212648 7/14/2004 ZOUR, BRETT 459.40 AP - 00212649 7/14/2004 ZUNIGA, VALERiE 20.00 AP- 00212651 7/14/2004 ABLAC 281.36 AP- 00212652 7/14/2004 ADT SECURITY SERVICES INC 331.14 AP - 00212654 7/14/2004 ALLEN, SYLVESTER R 68.22 AP - 00212655 7/14/2004 BAKER, SHARI . 600.00 AP - 00212656 7/14/2004 BEN BOLLINGER PRODUCTIONS LTD. 1,000.00 AP- 00212657 7/14/2004 BROWER, DENISE 264.00 AP - 00212658 7/14/2004 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 25.00 AP - 00212658 7/14/2004 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 22.50 AP- 00212659 7/14/2004 CCCA 560.00 AP- 00212662 7/14/2004 COURT TRUSTEE 118.50 AP - 00212662 7/14/2004 COURT TRUSTEE 200.00 AP - 00212664 7/14/2004 DELLH1ME, SIGMUND 400.00 AP- 00212665 7/14/2004 DICK, ERIC 50.00 AP- 00212665 7/14/2004 DICK, ERIC 50.00 AP- 00212666 7/14/2004 DYNASTY GYM 2,645.00 AP - 00212667 7/14/2004 ETCO DEVELOPMENT 942.00 AP - 00212669 7/14/2004 FOSTER, CHRISTINE 100.00 AP - 00212670 7/14/2004 GOLDEN WEST DISTRIBUTING 60.60 AP - 00212671 7/14/2004 GONZALES, CARLOS 40.00 AP- 00212672 7/14/2004 HAKIMI, SUSAN 227.40 AP- 00212673 7/14/2004 HARALAMBOS BEVERAGE COMPANY 733.91 AP-00212674 7/14/2004 HARDY, BRADLEY 260.50 13 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 13 Current Date: 07/27/20C Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:25:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 7/14/2004 through 7/26/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00212675 7/14/2004 HDL COREN AND CONE 2,000.00 AP - 00212676 7/14/2004 I-IEILIG, KELLY 1,092.00 AP - 00212677 7/14/2004 HINRICHSEN, BARBARA 2,000.00 AP- 00212678 7/14/2004 HURST, CHERYL 288.50 AP- 00212679 7/14/2004 ICMA 1,130.00 AP - 00212680 7/14/2004 INLAND EMPIRE UTILITIES AGENCY 40.00 AP - 00212680 7/14/2004 INLAND EMPIRE UTILITIES AGENCY 40.00 AP - 00212682 7/14/2004 JAMES, CAMBRIAN 750.00 AP- 00212684 7/14/2004 LAFCO 5,350.00 AP- 00212685 7/14/2004 LaLONDE, JOHN 500.00 AP - 00212686 7/14/2004 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 175.00 AP - 00212687 7/14/2004 LOWER, DARLENE 251.00 AP - 00212688 7/14/2004 MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE 75.74 AP - 00212689 711412004 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 600.00 AP- 00212690 7/14/2004 MSA 190.00 AP - 00212691 7/14/2004 N M A DUES C/O NAOMI ROBERTS 8.31 AP - 00212693 7/14/2004 NATIONAL DEFERRED 27,536.95 AP - 00212694 7/14/2004 PEREZ, HECTOR 40.00 AP- 00212695 7/14/2004 PHOTOGRAPHY BY KENNETH 35.00 AP - 00212695 7/14/2004 PHOTOGRAPHY BY KENNETH 235.00 AP - 00212696 7/14/2004 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 156.63 AP- 00212697 7/14/2004 QUINTANA, ZITA 193.00 AP - 00212698 7/14/2004 RANCHO CIJCAMONGA QUAKES PROFESSIONP 11,125.00 AP - 00212700 7/14/2004 REINHARDTSEN, DEBRA 282.50 AP - 00212701 7/14/2004 RIVERSIDE CO DEPT CHILD SUPPORT 226.00 AP - 00212702 7/14/2004 RIVERSIDE CO DEPT CHILD SUPPORT 250.00 AP - 00212705 7/14/2004 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 12,336.20 AP - 00212706 7/14/2004 SAN BERNARDINO CTY CHILD SUPPORT PAYM 131.00 AP - 00212707 7/14/2004 SAN BERNARDINO CTY CHILD SUPPORT PAYM 213.00 AP - 00212708 7/14/2004 SAN BERNARDINO CTY CHILD SUPPORT PAYM 213.50 AP- 00212709 7/14/2004 SCOTT, DIANA 250.00 AP- 00212710 7/14/2004 SHROPE, DOUGLAS 1,500.00 AP - 00212713 7/14/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOC OF GOVERNM' 11,191.00 AP- 00212714 7/14/2004 STEVENS, MICHELE 750.00 AP- 00212715 7/14/2004 STOFA, JOSEPH 15.00 AP - 00212717 7/14/2004 UN/FIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 546.26 AP - 00212717 7/14/2004 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 23.56 AP- 00212717 7/14/2004 UN/FIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 51.21 AP- 00212717 7/14/2004 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 39.61 AP- 00212717 7/14/2004 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 134.82 AP- 00212718 7/14/2004 UNITED WAY 511.12 AP - 00212719 7/14/2004 VIRTUAL PROJECT MANAGER INC 500.00 AP - 00212720 7/14/2004 VOLM, LIZA 112.50 AP- 00212721 7/14/2004 WARD, DESIREE 525.00 AP - 00212722 7/14/2004 YEE, LARRY 6.00 AP - 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 152.13 AP- 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 158.68 AP - 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 146.38 AP - 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 407.43 AP - 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 150.98 AP - 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 143.73 AP- 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 141.78 AP- 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 127.63 l ~ User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 14 Current Date: 07/27/20C Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:25:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 7/14/2004 through 7/26/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 624.43 AP - 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 461.48 AP - 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 594.08 AP - 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,198.18 AP- 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 33.68 AP - 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 785.43 AP - 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 76.23 AP- 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 796.93 AP - 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,107.43 AP- 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 18.40 AP - 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 44.03 AP - 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 750.93 AP- 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 60.13 AP - 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 312.78 AP - 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 402.83 AP - 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 80.83 AP- 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 214.23 AP - 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 180.53 AP - 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 931.38 AP - 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 753.23 AP - 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 377.18 AP- 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 201.58 AP - 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 4,904.93 AP - 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 55.53 AP - 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 654.33 AP- 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 818.78 AP - 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 121.78 AP - 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 448.48 AP - 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 36.80 AP - 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,137.23 AP - 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 471.38 AP - 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 562.23 AP - 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 258.63 AP- 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,337.33 AP - 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 677.23 AP- 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 60.13 AP- 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 116.13 AP- 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 126.48 AP - 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 205.48 AP - 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 265.98 AP - 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 327.73 AP - 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 60.13 AP - 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 129.83 AP- 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 163.18 AP- 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 722.18 AP- 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 859.03 AP - 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 68.48 AP- 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,691.53 AP - 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 3,830.93 AP- 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 159.02 AP- 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 348.00 AP - 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 12,768.18 AP - 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 562.68 /,5 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 15 Current Date: 07/27/20(i Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:25:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 7/14/2004 through 7/26/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,810.95 AP - 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 156.28 AP - 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,351.13 AP- 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 692.18 AP - 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 586.48 AP - 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 363.73 AP- 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 128.78 AP- 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 821.08 AP - 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 289.78 AP - 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,339.63 AP - 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 489.78 AP - 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,111.93 AP - 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 336.93 AP - 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 32.83 AP- 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 471.38 AP- 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 988.53 AP - 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 757.73 AP - 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 306.93 AP - 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 54.68 AP - 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 23.63 AP - 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 538.18 AP - 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 202.28 AP - 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 46.33 AP- 00212726 7/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 174.78 AP- 00212727 7/21/2004 ABC LOCKSMITHS 3.23 AP- 00212728 7/21/2004 ACCU CUT 122.40 AP-00212728 7/21/2004 ACCLICUT -18.60 AP - 00212729 7/21/2004 ADAMSON, RONALD 957.00 AP- 00212730 7/21/2004 ABF SYSTEMS CONSULTING INC 875.00 AP- 00212731 7/21/2004 ALLIANCE BUS LINES INC 519.30 AP- 00212733 7/21/2004 ALPERT PRINTING 1,127.03 AP - 00212734 7/21/2004 ALTA PARK APARTMENTS 506.64 AP-00212735 7/21/2004 AMAZON.COMCREDIT 661.98 AP - 00212737 7/21/2004 ARCH WIRELESS 669.77 AP - 00212738 7/21/2004 ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS 15,881.00 AP - 00212739 7/21/2004 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE -15.52 AP - 00212739 7/21/2004 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 22.63 AP- 00212740 7/21/2004 BADDER, JENNY 50.00 AP- 00212741 7/21/2004 BARNES AND NOBLE 2,690.30 AP - 00212741 7/21/2004 BARNES AND NOBLE 511.42 AP- 00212741 7/21/2004 BARNES AND NOBLE 675.50 AP - 00212741 7/21/2004 BARNES AND NOBLE 656.42 AP - 00212741 7/21/2004 BARNES AND NOBLE 974.81 AP - 00212741 7/21/2004 BARNES AND NOBLE 1,542.74 AP - 00212741 7/21/2004 BARNES AND NOBLE 1,424.36 AP- 00212741 7/21/2004 BARNES AND NOBLE 573.42 AP - 00212744 7/21/2004 BERN MARIES PROMOTIONAL PRODUCTS 2,092.57 AP- 00212745 7/21/2004 BISHOP COMPANY 222.72 AP - 00212746 7/21/2004 BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS CORP 2,357.57 AP - 00212746 7/21/2004 BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS CORP 5,950.50 AP - 00212747 7/21/2004 BOOKS ON TAPE INC 7,000.00 AP - 00212747 7/21/2004 BOOKS ON TAPE INC 178.43 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 16 Current Date: 07/27/20C Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:25:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 7/14/2004 through 7/26/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00212748 7/21/2004 BRANDMAN ASSOCIATES INC, MICHAEL 8,033.21 AP- 00212749 7/21/2004 BRODARTBOOKS 545.18 AP - 00212750 7/21/2004 BROWNE, JILLIAN 24.00 AP - 00212753 7/21/2004 CALIFORNIA CODE CHECK INC. 13,930.00 AP - 00212753 7/21/2004 CALIFORNIA CODE CHECK INC. 11,375.00 AP - 00212754 7/21/2004 CALIFORNIA STATE LIBRARY 3,870.00 AP- 00212755 7/21/2004 CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES 170.00 AP- 00212756 7/21/2004 CLAEYS, MICHAEL 750.00 ,ap_ 00212757 7/21/2004 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 201.20 AP - 00212757 7/21/2004 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 1,860.96 AP - 00212758 7/21/2004 CONCENTRA MEDICAL CENTERS 91.15 AP - 00212758 7/21/2004 CONCENTRA MEDICAL CENTERS 11.69 AP - 00212758 7/21/2004 CONCENTRA MEDICAL CENTERS 59.29 AP- 00212759 7/21/2004 COPART 410.81 AP - 00212761 7/21/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 220.78 AP - 00212761 7/21/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 98.38 AP - 00212761 7/21/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 517.38 AP- 00212761 7/21/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,241.88 AP- 00212761 7/21/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 653.08 AP- 00212761 7/21/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 961.28 AP- 00212761 7/21/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 610.53 AP - 00212761 7/21/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 136.03 AP- 00212761 7/21/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 618.58 AP- 00212761 7/21/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 81.98 AP- 00212761 7/21/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 69.33 AP - 00212761 7/21/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 669.18 AP - 00212761 7/21/2004 CUCAMONOA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 858.93 AP - 00212762 7/21/2004 DAN GUEKRA AND ASSOCIATES 5,810.00 AP - 00212762 7/21/2004 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 47,352.50 AP - 00212762 7/21/2004 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 13,965.00 AP - 00212762 7/21/2004 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 9,195.00 AP- 00212762 7/21/2004 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 14,160.00 AP - 00212762 7/21/2004 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 160.00 AP- 00212763 7/21/2004 DATA QUICK 93.50 AP- 00212763 7/21/2004 DATA QUICK 93.50 AP- 00212764 7/21/2004 DAVIS, GEORGE 175.00 AP- 00212765 7/21/2004 DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION 41,773.58 AP- 00212766 7/21/2004 DYE AND BROWNING CONSTRUCTION 79,740.26 AP - 00212766 7/21/2004 DYE AND BROWNING CONSTRUCTION -7,974.03 AP - 00212768 7/21/2004 ELLISON EDUCATIONAL EQUIPMENT INC 377.34 AP - 00212769 7/21/2004 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 20.86 AP - 00212770 7/21/2004 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 364.50 AP- 00212770 7/21/2004 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 360.00 AP- 00212771 7/21/2004 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 137.03 AP - 00212772 7/21/2004 FOOTHILL FAMILY SHELTER 417.00 AP - 00212772 7/21/2004 FOOTHILL FAMILY SHELTER 413.00 AP - 00212773 7/21/2004 GALE GROUP,THE 175.05 AP - 00212773 7/21/2004 GALE GROUP,THE 62.66 AP - 00212774 7/21/2004 GARCIA, VIVIAN 14.25 AP- 00212776 7/21/2004 GENERAL NUTRITION CENTER #2176 135.37 AP - 00212778 7/21/2004 GOLF VENTURES WEST 343.31 AP- 00212778 7/21/2004 GOLF VENTURES WEST 365.66 AP_00212780 7/21/ 004 ORIBIB, BET. 6.13 /? User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 17 Current Date: 07/27/20C Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:25:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 7/1412004 through 7/26/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00212780 7/21/2004 GRIBIB, BETH 20.00 AP- 00212781 7/21/2004 GTSI CORP 10,329.68 AP- 00212781 7/21/2004 GTSI CORP 6,415.32 AP- 00212782 7/21/2004 HALE, SHERRI 24.00 AP - 00212783 7/21/2004 HALL & FOREMAN INC. 300.00 AP- 00212784 7/21/2004 HARRIS, CHRISTOPHER 12.38 AP - 00212785 7/21/2004 HIP, CO LLC 500.00 AP - 00212785 7/21/2004 HIRCO LLC 895.16 AP - 00212786 7/21/2004 HOMELESS OUTREACH PRGMS AND EDUCATI( 542.00 AP - 00212786 7/21/2004 HOMELESS OUTREACH PRGMS AND EDUCATI( 534.00 AP- 00212787 7/21/2004 HOUSE OFRUTH 633.00 AP - 00212788 7/21/2004 HOWARD, LA TASHA 24.00 AP - 00212789 7/21/2004 HUMANE SOCI~TY OF SAN BERNARDINO VALI 210.00 AP - 00212790 7/21/2004 INLAND FAIR HOUSING AND MEDIATION 1,928.68 AP - 00212790 7/21/2004 INLAND FAIR HOUSING AND MEDIATION 1,173.96 AP- 00212790 7/21/2004 INLAND FAIR HOUSING AND MEDIATION 813.41 AP- 00212790 7/21/2004 INLAND FAIR HOUSING AND MEDIATION 895.12 AP- 00212792 7/21/2004 JMG SECURITY SYSTEM 68.93 AP - 00212793 7/21/2004 JOHNSON, YVETTE 70.00 AP - 00212794 7/21/2004 JONES AND MAYER LAW OFFICES OF 450.00 AP - 00212794 7/21/2004 JONES AND MAYER LAW OFFICES OF 491.72 AP - 00212795 7/21/2004 JORDAN, GRACE 49.00 AP- 00212796 7/21/2004 JUAREZ, JAMIE 98.00 AP - 00212797 7/21/2004 JUST PUMPING 685.00 AP - 00212798 7/21/2004 KC PRINTING & GRAPHICS INC 1,030.36 AP - 00212798 7/21/2004 KC PRINTING & GRAPHICS INC 453.25 AP - 00212799 7/21/2004 KRAZAN AND ASSOCIATES INC 1,410.00 AP - 00212800 7/21/2004 LA CHASE, T1NA 80.00 AP - 00212800 7/21/2004 LA CHASE, TINA 200.00 AP- 00212801 7/21/2004 LAIRD CONSTRUCTION CO 145,957.93 AP- 00212801 7/21/2004 LAIRD CONSTRUCTION CO -14,595.79 AP - 00212802 7/21/2004 LANCE SOLL AND LUNGHARD 5,754.00 AP - 00212803 7/21/2004 LILBURN CORPORATION 10,419.80 AP - 00212803 7/21/2004 LILBURN CORPORATION 8,144.50 AP - 00212803 7/21/2004 LILBURN CORPORATION 2,461.00 AP- 00212805 7/21/2004 M & M BOYS SUPPLY 51.80 AP- 00212806 7/21/2004 MANELA, ROSARIO 7.56 AP- 00212806 7/21/2004 MANELA, ROSARIO 56.63 AP - 00212807 7/21/2004 MARTINEZ, SUSAN 63.00 AP-00212808 7/21/2004 MCI 640.81 AP- 00212808 7/21/2004 MCI 595.02 AP- 00212810 7/21/2004 MIDWEST TAPE 17.98 AP - 00212810 7/21/2004 MIDWEST TAPE 52.97 AP- 00212810 7/21/2004 MIDWEST TAPE 15.98 AP- 00212810 7/21/2004 MIDWEST TAPE 131.96 AP- 00212810 7/21/2004 MIDWEST TAPE 98.93 AP- 00212810 7/21/2004 MIDWEST TAPE 136.93 AP - 00212812 7/21/2004 MOORE, NATALIE 45.00 AP- 00212813 7/21/2004 MORENO, LISA 40.00 AP- 00212815 7/21/2004 NAZIRI, ELIZABETH 25.00 AP - 00212816 7/21/2004 NEC BUSINESS NETWORK SOLUTIONS INC 200.00 AP- 00212816 7/21/2004 NEC BUSINESS NETWORK SOLUTIONS/NC 200.00 AP- 00212816 7/21/2004 NEC BUSINESS NETWORK SOLUTIONS INC 150.00 /~ User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 18 Current Date: 07/27/20G Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:25:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 7/14/2004 through 7/26/2004 Check No. .Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP- 00212816 7/21/2004 NEC BUSINESS NETWORK SOLUTIONS INC 100.00 AP - 00212816 7/21/2004 NEC BUSINESS NETWORK SOLUTIONS INC 200.00 AP - 00212817 7/21/2004 O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC 36.66 AP- 00212817 7/21/2004 O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC 85.34 AP - 00212817 7/21/2004 O C B REPROGRAPHiCS INC 144.76 AP - 00212817 7/21/2004 O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC 33.14 AP- 00212817 7/21/2004 O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC 95.68 AP- 00212817 7/21/2004 O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC 32.86 AP - 00212817 7/21/2004 O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC 75.72 AP-00212819 7/21/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 49.13 AP- 00212819 7/21/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 1.94 AP- 00212819 7/21/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 30.39 AP- 00212819 7/21/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 5.08 AP-00212819 7/21/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 14.78 AP- 00212819 7/21/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 187.92 AP-00212819 7/21/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 77.58 AP- 00212819 7/21/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 44.44 AP- 00212819 7/21/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 75.37 AP- 00212819 7/21/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 15.97 AP-00212819 7/21/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 126.71 AP-00212819 7/21/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 91.40 AP-00212819 7/21/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 449.64 AP- 00212819 7/21/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 284.73 AP- 00212819 7/21/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 588.93 AP- 00212819 7/21/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 7.39 AP- 00212819 7/21/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 50.67 AP- 00212819 7/21/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 343.09 AP - 00212819 7/21/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 343.09 AP-00212819 7/21/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 123.32 AP-00212819 7/21/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 179.08 AP-00212819 7/21/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 8.15 AP - 00212819 7/21/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 15.11 AP- 00212819 7/21/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 422.36 AP- 00212819 7/21/2004 OFFICE DEPOT -96.21 AP- 00212819 7/21/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 96.21 AP- 00212819 7/21/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 8.84 AP-00212819 7/21/20~4 OFFICE DEPOT 222.16 AP- 00212819 7/21/20~4 OFFICE DEPOT 25.92 AP- 00212819 7/21/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 19.34 AP- 00212819 7/21/20~4 OFFICE DEPOT 53.98 AP- 00212819 7/21/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 7.07 AP- 00212819 7/21/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 248.13 AP- 00212819 7/21/2004 OFFICE DEPOT i03.70 AP- 00212819 7/21/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 23.27 AP - 00212819 7/21/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 20.04 AP-00212819 7/21/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 9.31 AP- 00212819 7/21/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 97.33 AP- 00212819 7/21/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 24.05 AP - 00212820 7/21/2004 OWEN ELECTRIC 3,864.26 AP - 00212821 7/21/2004 PACIFIC EQUIP AND IRRIGATION [NC 231.07 AP- 00212821 7/21/2004 PACIFIC EQUIP AND IRRIGATION INC 269.15 AP - 00212822 7/21/2004 PACIFIC PLUMBING SPECIALTIES 925.14 AP - 00212822 7/21/2004 PACIPIC PLUMBING SPECIALTIES 1,050.82 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: t9 Current Date: 07/27/20C Report:CK_AGENDA KEG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:25:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 7/14/2004 through 7/26/2004 Cheek No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00212823 7/21/2004 PATEL, PARUN 6.13 AP- 00212826 7/21/2004 PEREZ, CARLOS 1,150.00 AP - 00212827 7/21/2004 PERFORMANCE AUTO BODY 863.65 AP- 00212827 7/21/2004 PERFORMANCE AUTO BODY 1,176.10 AP- 00212828 7/21/2004 PHOENIX GROUP INFORMATION SYSTEMS 572.24 AP-00212829 7/21/2004 PITNEY BOWES 172.00 AP - 00212830 7/21/2004 POMONA INLAND VALLEY COUNCIL OF CHUR~ 519.75 AP - 00212830 7/21/2004 POMONA INLAND VALLEY COUNCIL OF CHUR~ 594.00 AP ~ 00212831 7/21/2004 POMONA VALLEY KAWASAKI 722.62 AP ~ 00212831 7/21/2004 POMONA VALLEY KAWASAKI 835.41 AP - 00212832 7/21/2004 PORTERA, ELEANOR 45.00 AP- 00212833 7/21/2004 POWERPLUS 25.00 AP- 00212833 7/21/2004 POWERPLUS 25.00 AP - 00212834 7/21/2004 PRECISION BUILDING 30.00 AP - 00212835 7/21/2004 R AND B REINFORCING STEEL CORF 458.82 AP - 00212836 7/21/2004 REFRIGERATION CONTROL COMPANY INC 900.22 AP - 00212836 7/21/2004 REFRIGERATION CONTROL COMPANY INC 110.00 AP - 00212836 7/21/2004 REFRIGERATION CONTROL COMPANY LNC 286.88 AP - 00212836 7/21/2004 REFRIGERATION CONTROL COMPANY INC 808.11 AP - 00212837 7/21/2004 REPUBLIC ELECTRIC 923.44 AP-00212837 7/21/2004 REPUBLIC ELECTRIC 6,075.59 AP- 00212837 7/21/2004 REPUBLIC ELECTRIC 651.12 AP - 00212837 7/21/2004 REPUBLIC ELECTRIC 5,960.00 AP - 00212840 7/21/2004 ROBERT HALF TECHNOLOGY 660.00 AP - 00212842 7/21/2004 ROSSCRETE ROOFING INC 122.00 AP - 00212844 7/21/2004 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 74.50 AP - 00212845 7/21/2004 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 498.00 AP - 00212845 7/21/2004 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 498.00 AP - 00212845 7/21/2004 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 664.00 AP - 00212846 7/21/2004 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEFT 6,580.22 AP ~ 00212846 7/21/2004 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT 6,484.99 AP- 00212847 7/21/2004 SBC LONG DISTANCE 7.79 AP- 00212848 7/21/2004 SBC 1,910.93 AP- 00212848 7/21/2004 SBC 5,018.04 AP - 00212849 7/21/2004 SHEA INFORMATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENq 937.50 AP- 00212850 7/21/2004 SIGNET TESTING LABS INC 2,137.50 AP - 00212851 7/21/2004 SMART AND FINAL 354.50 AP- 00212851 7/21/2004 SMART AND FINAL 18.75 AP - 00212852 7/21/2004 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 20.87 AP- 00212852 7/21/2004 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 132.81 AP - 00212853 7/21/2004 SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL INC 5,101.96 AP - 00212853 7/21/2004 SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL INC 518.00 AP - 00212854 7/21/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19,429.89 AP - 00212854 7/21/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 46.56 AP- 00212854 7/21/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 53.28 AP - 00212854 7/21/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 37.05 AP - 00212854 7/21/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 45.24 AP - 00212854 7/21/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 35,221.23 AP - 00212854 7/21/2004 SOUTI-I~RN CALIFORNIA EDISON 181.47 AP - 00212854 7/21/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 44.24 AP - 00212854 7/21/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,727.75 AP - 00212854 7/21/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,868.67 AP - 00212854 7/21/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 4,212.90 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 20 Current Date: 07/27/2012 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:25:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 7/14/2004 through 7/26/2004 .Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00212854 7/21/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12,120.96 AP - 00212854 7/21/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14,992.80 AP - 00212855 7/21/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LIBRARY 100.00 AP - 00212858 7/21/2004 STEELWORKERS OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION 708.33 AP - 00212858 7/21/2004 STEELWORKERS OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION 708.33 AP - 00212858 7/21/2004 STEELWORKERS OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION 786.53 AP- 00212859 7/21/2004 STERICYCLE INC 221.32 AP- 00212860 7/21/2004 TMOBILE 44.55 AP- 00212861 7/21/2004 TARGET STORES DIVISION 119.90 AP- 00212861 7/21/2004 TARGET STORES DIVISION 76.41 AP- 00212861 7/21/2004 TARGET STORES DIVISION 48.00 AP- 00212861 7/21/2004 TARGET STORES DIVISION 244.95 AP - 002 I2862 7/21/2004 TEAM PHYSICAL THERAPY 789.03 AP - 00212863 7/21/2004 TIMES COMMUNITY NEWS 126.00 AP - 00212863 7/21/2004 TIMES COMMUNITY NEWS 126.00 AP - 00212863 7/21/2004 TIMES COMMUNITY NEWS 126.00 AP - 00212864 7/21/2004 TOBIN, RENEE 80.81 AP - 00212864 7/21/2004 TOBIN, RENEE 8.66 AP- 00212865 7/21/2004 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS INC t,851.55 AP - 00212866 7/21/2004 TRENCHING BY DAVIS INC I03.97 AP - 00212867 7/21/2004 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 6,479.26 AP - 00212867 7/21/2004 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 20,963.93 AP - 00212867 7/21/2004 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 60,312.67 AP - 00212867 7/21/2004 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 18,238.33 AP - 00212867 7/21/2004 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 48.72 AP- 00212867 7/21/2004 TRUGREENLANDCARE 15,415.77 AP - 00212867 7/21/2004 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 13,882.38 AP - 00212867 7/21/2004 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 581.00 AP - 00212867 7/21/2004 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 681.60 AP - 00212868 7/21/2004 UNDERGROUND TECHNOLOGY INC 425.54 AP - 00212869 7/21/2004 URBAN CROSSROADS INC 660.00 AP - 00212870 7/21/2004 VALLEY ROOTER AND PLUMBING REPAIR 2,331.00 AP- 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 43.69 AP- 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 77.46 AP- 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 570.62 AP- 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 131.96 AP- 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 135.14 AP- 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 27.55 AP- 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 591.93 AP- 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 601.16 AP- 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 86.75 AP- 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 28.34 AP-00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 139.09 AP- 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 91.16 AP- 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 20.42 AP- 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 27.95 AP- 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 91.16 AP- 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 91.16 AP- 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 91.16 AP - 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 91.16 AP - 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 30.42 AP - 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 22.42 AP- 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 35.89 31 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 21 Current Date: 07/27/20E Report:CK_AGENDA KEG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:25:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 7/14/2004 through 7/26/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP-00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 91.16 AP- 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 91.16 AP-00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 91.16 AP-00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 91.16 AP- 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 91.16 AP-00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 91.16 AP- 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 28.34 AP- 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 131.93 AP- 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 91.16 AP- 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 91.16 AP- 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 91.16 AP- 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 28.00 AP- 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 20.42 AP- 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 20.42 AP- 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 28.35 AP- 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 20.42 AP- 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 91.16 AP- 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 169.96 AP- 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 127.82 AP- 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 158.91 AP- 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 626.38 AP-00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 163.25 AP- 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 60.56 AP - 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 115.60 AP- 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 180.46 AP- 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 1,245.43 AP-00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 27.95 AP - 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 47.06 AP- 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 47.79 AP 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 464.25 AP 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 464.25 AP 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 205.43 AP 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 42.54 AP 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 82.74 AP 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 91.16 AP 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 89.77 AP 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 28.34 AP 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 33.23 AP- 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 89.77 AP-00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 28.92 AP- 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 28.34 AP- 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 29.74 AP- 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 318.02 AP-00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 91.19 AP- 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 89.73 AP- 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 89.73 AP- 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 89.73 AP- 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 91.19 AP- 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 91.19 AP- 00212873 7/21/2004 VER1ZON 91.19 AP- 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 92.33 AP - 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 29.34 AP - 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 354.22 ~.. User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 22 Current Date: 07/27/20¢ Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:25:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 7/14/2004 through 7/26/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP-00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 91.16 AP - 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 492.08 AP- 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 29.39 AP - 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 386.65 AP- 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 60.05 AP-00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 89.77 AP-00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 29.34 AP-00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 29.34 AP-00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 29.33 AP-00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 58.69 AP- 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 29.33 AP- 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 86.62 AP- 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 159.40 AP-00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 59.74 AP- 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 29.33 AP- 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 27.91 AP-00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 398.60 AP-00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 29.33 AP- 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 28.88 AP- 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 89.77 AP- 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 150.77 AP- 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 91.16 AP- 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 91.16 AP- 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 91.16 AP- 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 27.91 AP-00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 146.83 AP-00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 89.73 AP-00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 88.65 AP-00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 85.04 AP- 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 179.22 AP- 00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 27.55 AP-00212873 7/21/2004 VERIZON 122.34 AP- 00212874 7/21/2004 VERIZON 32.45 AP-90212875 7/21/2004 VUONG, ANNIE 145.00 AP- 00212876 7/21/2004 WAFER, LEON 100.00 AP - 00212877 7/21/2004 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 642.58 AP - 00212877 7/21/2004 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 6,980.91 AP - 00212877 7/21/2004 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 170.28 AP - 00212877 7/21/2004 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 326.64 AP- 00212877 7/21/2004 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 928.63 AP - 00212877 7/21/2004 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 262.43 AP- 00212877 7/21/2004 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 310.12 AP - 00212877 7/21/2004 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 262.43 AP - 00212877 7/21/2004 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 52.49 AP - 00212877 7/21/2004 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 687.93 AP - 00212877 7/21/2004 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 1,296.62 AP- 00212877 7/21/2004 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 152.13 AP- 00212878 7/21/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 142.56 AP - 00212878 7/21/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 237.93 AP - 00212878 7/21/2004 WEST VALLEY IvlRF LLC 110.00 AP- 00212878 7/21/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 34.98 AP- 00212878 7/21/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 216.81 AP - 00212878 7/21/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 117.92 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 23 Current Date: 07/27/20C Report:CK_AGENDA PEG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:25:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 7/14/2004 through 7/26/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00212878 7/21/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 109.78 AP - 00212878 7/21/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 26.40 AP - 00212878 7/21/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 123.86 AP - 00212878 7/21/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 101.64 AP - 00212878 7/21/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 18.92 AP - 00212878 7/2t/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 116.82 AP - 00212882 7/21/2004 WU, IRENE 30.00 AP- 00212883 7/21/2004 XEROX CORPORATION 33.92 AP - 00212883 7/21/2004 XEROX CORPORATION 33.92 AP- 00212884 7/21/2004 YNIQUEZ, TRACY 29.63 AP-00212885 7/21/2004 ZAMORA, SANDRA 60.00 AP-00212887 7/21/2004 AACT 55.00 AP- 00212888 7/21/2004 ABLAC 16.39 AP- 00212890 7/21/2004 ALLIANCE BUS LINES INC 519.30 AP - 00212892 7/21/2004 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION 470.00 AP - 00212892 7/21/2004 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION 290.00 AP - 00212892 7/21/2004 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION 280.00 AP - 00212892 7/21/2004 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION 322.00 AP- 00212894 7/21/2004 BODY SHOTS 1,251.25 AP- 00212895 7/21/2004 BOOKS ON TAPE INC 77.58 AP- 00212895 7/21/2004 BOOKS ON TAPE INC 82.75 AP ~ 00212896 7/21/2004 BORDNER, MARGIE 871.20 AP - 00212897 7/21/2004 BRUNSWICK DEER CREEK LANES 1,118.25 AP- 00212898 7/21/2004 BURKE, KAREN 225.00 AP - 00212899 7/21/2004 CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES 72,415.22 AP- 00212900 7/21/2004 CAPRCBM 165.00 AP- 00212901 7/21/2004 CARAWAY, ROBIN 18.00 AP - 00212902 7/21/2004 CENTER ICE ARENA 396.90 AP- 00212903 7/21/2004 CLABBY, SANDRA 1,000.00 AP- 00212904 7/21/2004 CLARK, KAREN 372.00 AP - 00212905 7/21/2004 CLASS SOFTWARE SOLIJTIONS t7,531.25 AP - 00212907 7/21/2004 COASTAL BUILDING SERVICES INC 40.00 AP - 00212908 7/21/2004 COMBINED MARTIAL SCIENCE INC 2,276.70 AP-00212909 7/21/2004 CPRS 130.00 AP - 00212910 7/21/2004 CRAWFORD, JOHN 900.00 AP - 00212911 7/21/2004 DAGHDEVIRIAN, KATHY 885.60 AP - 00212912 7/21/2004 DANCE TERRIFIC 2,304.13 AP- 00212913 7/21/2004 DAVENPORT, JAY E. 632.00 AP- 00212914 7/21/2004 DAWSON, MICHELE 81.26 AP- 00212914 7/21/2004 DAWSON, MICHELE 20.00 AP- 00212915 7/21/2004 DE LEISE, JENAE 519.24 AP- 00212916 7/21/2004 DELANY, DANI 107.10 AP - 00212917 7/21/2004 DILLON, BERNIE 66.00 AP- 00212918 7/21/2004 DIRECTV 63.05 AP - 00212919 7/21/2004 DRACHAND, DI ANNE ' 1,440.00 AP - 00212920 7/21/2004 DUIq~'¥, RICK 2,201.50 AP- 00212921 7/21/2004 DYAN, DIANE 1,072.50 AP- 00212924 7/21/2004 ELCHICANO 65.00 AP - 00212925 7/21/2004 EXPERIAN 50.00 AP - 00212927 7/21/2004 FULLERTON CIVIC LIGHT OPERA SCENIC RENq 1,077.50 AP-00212928 7/21/2004 GARCIA, VIVIAN 27.38 AP - 00212929 7/21/2004 GIORDANO, MARIANNA 207.00 AP - 00212930 7/21/2004 GONSALVES AND SON,JOE A 2,500.00 e:~q User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 24 Current Date: 07/27/20¢ Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:25:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 7/14/2004 through 7/26/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP- 00212931 7/21/2004 HANGER 18 LLC. 819.00 AP - 00212932 7/21/2004 HARMONY ARTISTS INC 2,000.00 AP- 00212935 7/21/2004 HOYT, RAYMOND 1,045.20 AP- 00212936 7/21/2004 HSU, STEVE 342.00 AP - 00212937 7/21/2004 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 356.87 AP- 00212938 7/21/2004 IBM CORPORATION 417.38 AP-00212938 7/21/2004 IBM CORPORATION 5,128.38 AP - 00212941 7/21/2004 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN t72.80 AP - 00212942 7/21/2004 INLAND VALLEY DANCE ACADEMY 1,672.25 AP - 00212944 7/21/2004 ISPA FOUNDATION 500.00 AP- 00212945 7/21/2004 JONES, BOB 1,632.00 AP- 00212946 7/21/2004 KELLEY BLUE BOOK 89.00 AP- 00212947 7/21/2004 KIDSART 1,613.50 AP- 00212949 7/21/2004 KOZLOVICH, DEBBIE 3,192.90 AP- 00212952 7/21/2004 LIM, HEATHER 813.00 AP- 00212953 7/21/2004 LIVE OAK DOG OBEDIENCE 528.00 AP- 00212954 7/21/2004 MARQUINA, VANIA 144.00 AP- 00212955 7/21/2004 MARSHALL, SYLVIA 967.20 AP-00212956 7/21/2004 MCLS 150.00 AP - 00212957 7/21/2004 MIDWEST TAPE 26.98 AP- 00212957 7/21/2004 MIDWEST TAPE 22.99 AP 00212958 7/21/2004 MOE, JOHN 324.00 AP 00212961 7/21/2004 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS INC 969.75 AP 00212962 7/21/2004 NATIONAL DEFERRED 11,503.47 AP 00212963 7/21/20~4 NEPTUNE FIRE PROTECTION 90.00 AP 00212965 7/21/20~4 OFFICE DEPOT 40.15 AP 00212965 7/21/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 3.64 AP 00212965 7/21/2004 OFFICE DEPOT -3.64 AP 00212967 7/21/2004 PACIFIC TILE AND CONSTRUCTION 40.00 AP - 00212968 7/21/2004 PACIFICARE OF CALIFORNIA 54,090.72 AP - 00212969 7/21/2004 PACIFICARE OF CALIFORNIA 50,238.21 AP - 00212969 7/21/2004 PACIFICARE OF CALIFORNIA 1,990.08 AP - 00212970 7/21/2004 PARKER, SHANNON 96.00 AP - 00212971 7/21/2004 PEPES TOWING SERVICE 68.40 AP- 00212972 7/21/2004 PHASE II SYSTEMS 3,500.00 AP - 00212973 7/21/2004 PHOTOGRAPHY BY KENNETH 100.00 AP - 00212973 7/21/2004 PHOTOGRAPHY BY KENNETH 35.00 AP - 00212974 7/21/2004 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 6.81 AP- 00212975 7/21/2004 PRECISION GYMNASTICS 1,318.80 AP- 00212976 7/21/2004 PRIMEVESTCAPITAL 590.70 AP- 00212978 7/21/2004 PROTECTION SERVICE INDUSTRIES L.P. 198.74 AP - 00212979 7/21/2004 PURE HEART MINISTRIES 11.00 AP - 00212982 7/21/2004 RANCHO SCREEN PRINT AND EMBROIDERY 393.29 AP- 00212983 7/21/2004 RCPFA 6,183.02 AP - 00212986 7/21/2004 SALVIATI, MARTHA 252.00 AP - 00212987 7/21/2004 SAN BERNARDINO CO FIRE DEPT 2,157.00 AP - 00212987 7/21/2004 SAN BERNARDINO CO FIRE DEPT 812.00 AP - 00212989 7/21/2004 SAN BERNARD1NO COUNTY 116,100.00 AP - 00212992 7/21/2004 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT 1,139,408.00 AP - 00212992 7/21/2004 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT 24,281.00 AP - 00212992 7/21/2004 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT 12,680.00 AP- 00212993 7/21/2004 SAWYERS, MARY 215.00 AP - 00212994 7/21/2004 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 75.00 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 25 Current Date: 07/27/20E Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:25:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 7/14/2004 through 7/26/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount. AP - 00212995 7/21/2004 SHERLOCK, ROBERT M 500.00 AP - 00212997 7/21/2004 SMART AND FINAL 668.01 AP - 00212997 7/21/2004 SMART AND FINAL 75.67 AP - 00212997 7/21/2004 SMART AND FINAL 120.14 AP- 00212997 7/21/2004 SMART AND FINAL 167.12 AP-00212998 7/21/2004 SOFTCHOICECORPORATION 3,480.33 AP - 00212998 7/21/2004 SOFTCHOICE CORPORATION 985.00 AP - 00212999 7/21/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA RISK MANAGEMENT. 4,875.00 AP - 00213000 7/21/2004 STEELWORKERS OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION 708.37 AP- 00213001 7/21/2004 STERLING COFPEE SERVICE 38.40 AP- 00213001 7/21/2004 STERLING COFPEE SERVICE 86.68 AP- 00213001 7/21/2004 STERLING COPPt:E SERVICE 215.10 AP- 00213002 7/21/2004 TERRY, DONNA 441.00 AP - 00213003 7/21/2004 THEATRE COMPANY, THE 3,500.00 AP - 00213004 7/21/2004 THOMPSON PUBLISHING GROUP 498.00 AP - 00213006 7/21/2004 TUTORWHIZ INC 2,298.10 AP - 00213008 7/21/2004 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P, 2,632.45 AP 00213008 7/21/2004 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P, 22,375.83 AP 00213011 7/21/2004 UNITEDWAY 49.00 AP 00213012 7/21/2004 UPLAND TENNIS CLUB 2,030.40 AP 00213013 7/2t/2004 UPS 33.11 AP 00213015 7/21/2004 VIGILANCE, TERRENCE 267.75 AP 00213015 7/21/2004 VIGILANCE, TERRENCE 357.00 AP- 00213016 7/21/2004 WESTERN CHAPTER ISA 280.00 AP- 00213019 7/21/2004 ZAILO, ROBERT 504.00 AP - 00213021 7/22/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 166.87 AP- 00213021 7/22/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 7.41 AP- 00213021 7/22/2004 OFFICE DEPOT -14.83 AP- 00213021 7/22/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 122.71 AP - 00213021 7/22/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 118.31 AP - 00213021 7/22/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 5.19 AP- 00213021 7/22/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 303.71 AP - 00213021 7/22/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 103.99 AP- 00213021 7/22/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 67.83 AP - 00213021 7/22/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 22.20 AP - 00213021 7/22/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 11.10 AP - 00213021 7/22/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 71.58 AP- 00213021 7/22/2004 OFFICE DEPOT !1.76 AP - 00213021 7/22/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 95.57 AP - 00213021 7/22/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 275.97 AP- 00213021 7/22/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 73.34 AP - 00213021 7/22/2004 OlqqCE DEPOT 24.88 AP - 00213021 7/22/2004 OFIqCE DEPOT 12.36 AP- 00213021 7/22/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 88.55 AP- 00213021 7/22/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 330.24 AP- 00213021 7/22/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 592.24 AP- 00213021 7/22/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 123.52 AP- 00213021 7/22/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 28.90 AP - 00213021 7/22/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 74.22 AP - 00213021 7/22/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 68.22 AP - 00213021 7/22/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 26.53 AP - 00213021 7/22/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 220.00 AP - 00213021 7/22/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 47.72 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 26 Current Date: 07/27/20¢ Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:25:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 7/14/2004 through 7/26/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00213021 7/22/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 18.55 AP - 00213021 7/22/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 4.89 AP - 00213021 7/22/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 332.49 AP - 00213021 7/22/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 40.46 AP - 00213021 7/22/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 907.50 AP - 00213021 7/22/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 220.15 AP - 00213021 7/22/2004 OFFICE DEPOT -8.85 AP-00213021 7/22/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 5.30 AP-00213021 7/22/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 3t9.41 AP - 00213022 7/22/2004 FiLIPPI WINERY, JOSEPH 215.50 AP - 00213023 7/22/2004 G & D CONSTRUCTION INC 1,000.00 AP - 00213023 7/22/2004 G & D CONSTRUCTION INC 1,000.00 AP- 00213023 7/22/2004 G & D CONSTRUCTION INC 139,776.00 AP - 00213024 7/22/2004 HMC PROFESSIONAE SERVICES LLC. 1,100.00 AP - 00213025 7/22/2004 LOZA, JULIO 500.00 AP - 00213026 7/22/2004 OLTMANS CONSTRUCTION CO 5,000.00 AP - 00213027 7/22/2004 TEMP POWER SYSTEMS 250.00 AP - 00213028 7/22/2004 VLASEK, RORY 500.00 Total for Check ID AP: 3,705,340.19 Total for Entity: 3,705,340.19 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 27 Current Date: 07/27/20C Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:25:5 R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING D~PART~IENT Staff Report DATE: August 4, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Maria E. Perez, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR THE HIGHLAND AVENUE LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS EAST OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NO. 11103165650/1454110-0 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council approve the plans and specifications for the Highland Avenue Landscape Improvements, located 425 feet east of Day Creek Boulevard to 459 feet west of Locust Avenue, along the south side, and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids." BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS This project will install cobblestone hardscape, trees, shrubs and mulch along the south side of Highland Avenue from 425 feet east of Day Creek Boulevard to 459 feet west of Locust Avenue. Volunteers from the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints were originally committed to install the improvements as a volunteer project. However, current law does not allow volunteer work on public works projects unless prevailing wages are paid. The project would not be cost effective when compared to having the work performed by skilled labor. Funds have been budgeted for it to be a public bid project. The project will be funded from Beautification funds (Account No. 11103165650/1454110-0). The new landscaped area was added to LMD No. 8, site VW-16 addition earlier this year when the irrigation was installed. Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt per Article 19, Section 15301 (c) of the CEQA guidelines. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT HIGHLAND AVENUE LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS August 4, 2004 Page 2 The project plans and specifications were completed by staff and approved by the City Engineer. The Engineer's estimate is $88,000.00, including a 10% contingency, plus an additional estimate of $300.00 for printing services. Legal advertising is scheduled for August 10 and August 17, 2004, with a bid opening at 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, August 31, 2004, unless extended by Addenda. Resp,~u~ Ily submitte Willi~m/J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:MEP Attachments: Vicinity Map and Resolution PROJECT LOCATION 8TH ~J 5TH ST z 4THST ONIARIO CITY LIMIT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~ DAY ~ BL~. ~ ~9' ~ OF ~ A~. ~CINI~ ~P ~ ; RESOLUTION NO. I~ L/. ~Z/~' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR "THE HIGHLAND AVENUE LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS EAST OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD" IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for the "THE HIGHLAND AVENUE LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS EAST OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, August 31, 2004, sealed bids or proposals for the "THE HIGHLAND AVENUE LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS EAST OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "THE HIGHLAND AVENUE LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS EAST OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD". PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that RESOLUTION NO. August 4, 2004 Page 2 regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein before stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.5 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public work's project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 pement in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or RESOLUTION NO. August 4, 2004 Page 3 journeymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work herein before mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least 10% of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashiers' check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the Iow bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be 100% of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to 100% of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done RESOLUTION NO. August 4, 2004 Page 4 thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. On the date and at the time of the submittal of the Bidder's Proposal the Prime Contractor shall possess any and all contractor licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; Including but not limited to a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) or a Specialty Class "C27" license (Landscape Contractor) sufficient to cover all the work to be performed by the Prime Contractor in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code," Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, Engineering Counter, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and payment of $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS), said $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS) is non refundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional non- reimbursable payment of $15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of · Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga reserves the right to reject any or all bids. RESOLUTION NO. August 4, 2004 Page 5 Questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids for the "THE HIGHLAND AVENUE LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS EAST OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD" may be directed to: Maria E. Perez, Associate Engineer at (909) 477-2740, ext. 4036. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this 4th day of August, 2004 Publish Dates: August 10, 2004 and August 17, 2004 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this 4th day of August, 2004. William J. Alexander, Mayor A'FI'EST: Debra J. Adams, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 4th day of August, 2004. Executed this 4th day of August, 2004, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk ADVERTISE ON: August 10, 2004 and August 17, 2004 E N G I N E E R I N G D E P A R T M E N T Staff Report DATE: August 4, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Rene Guerrero, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF FINAL MAP AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 9 AND STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 8 FOR TRACT MAP 16454, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND ETIWANDA AVENUE, SUBMI'I-rED BY KB HOME GREATER LOS ANGELES, INC. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Tract Map 16454, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. I and 8 and authorizing the City Clerk to cause said map to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract Map 16454, located at the southeast corner of Base Line Road and Etiwanda Avenue, in the Iow-medium residential district, on August 27, 2003, for a subdivision of 188 lots on 37.82 acres of land. Tract Map No. 16454- 1 was the first of two final maps, being a subdivision of 81 lots on 27.14 acres of land, and wes approved by the City Council on February 4, 2004. Tract Map No. 16454 is the second of two final maps, being a subdivision of 36 lots on the remaining 10.68 acres of land. Prior to the approval of Tract Map No. 16454-1, the Developer, KB Home Greater Los Angeles, Inc., submitted an agreement, securities and monumentation cash deposit to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for both Tracts in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond $3,208,700.00 Labor and Material Bond $1,604,350.00 Monumentation Cash Deposit $ 8,2.50.00 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TRACT 16454 - KB HOME GREATER LOS ANGELES, INC. August 4, 2004 Page 2 The Developer is required to install portions of Base Line Road with this development. The required off-site improvements are located on property owned by neither the Developer nor the City. The Developer has made a good faith effort to acquire the off-site property, but has been unable to do so. An Acquisition Agreement has been executed and is scheduled for approval on tonight's agenda under a separate staff report. A letter of approval has been received from Cucamonga Valley Water District. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms signed by the Developer with the previous map are on file in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully submitted, COMMUNITY DEPARTMENT SERVICES ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT W~l~a'm J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:RG:tch Attachments VI¢IN/T Y MA NOT 7'0 SCALE CITY OF ITEM: 7-F-AcT RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: ENGINEERING DIVISION EXHIBIT: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NO. 16454 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 16454, submitted by KB Home Greater Los Angeles, Inc., and consisting of a subdivision of 37.82 acres of land into 118 lots, located at the southeast corner of Base Line Road and Etiwanda Avenue, in the Iow-medium residential district, was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on August 27, 2003; and WHEREAS, Tract Map No. 16454 is the second of two final maps for the division of land approved consisting of 36 lots on 10.68 acres of land as shown on the Tentative Tract Map; and WHEREAS, all the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have been met by posting the Improvement Securities with Tract 16454-1, by KB Home Greater Los Angeles, Inc., as developer; and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Tract Map No. 16454, be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. OZ¢. MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 9 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 8 FOR TRACT MAP 16454 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "72 Act"), said Landscape Maintenance District No. 9, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. I and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the 72 Act authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owner of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding the such provisions of the 72 Act related to the annexation of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the maintenance Districts on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of cedain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 72 Act to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and RESOLUTION TRACT 16454 - KB HOME GREATER LOS ANGELES, INC. August 4, 2004 Page 2 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 72 Act and/or Article XIIID applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amount snot to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The above recitals are all true and correct SECTION 2: This City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determine in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvements. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property To Be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: KB HOME GREATER LOS ANGELES, INC. The legal description of the Property is: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 16454, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY: PARCEL NO. 1; LOT 3, BLOCK "R", ACCORDING TO THE PRELIMINARY MAP OF ETIWANDA COLONY LANDS, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 2 OF MAPS, PAGE(S) 24, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. EXCEPT THEREFROM THAT PORTION DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 3 AND THE CENTER LINE OF BASE LINE AVENUE, SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 3; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 3, A DISTANCE OF 33 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 3, A DISTANCE OF 127 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEG. 47' 34" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 114.93 FEET TO A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 20 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90 DEG. 11' 52", A DISTANCE OF 31.45 FEET TO A LINE TANGENT; THENCE NORTH 0 DEG. 00' 34" WEST ALONG SAID TANGENT LINE TOT THE SOUTH LINE OF BASE LINE AVENUE (66 FEET WIDE); THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE OF BASE LINE AVENUE TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. ALSO EXCEPT THEREFROM ALL THAT PORTION OF SAID LOT 3 LYING WEST OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 3 WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF BASE LINE AVENUE, 66 FEET WIDE; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEG. 34' 44" WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF BASE LINE AVENUE, A DISTANCE OF 360.78 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 01 DEG. 11' 01" WEST, 385.08 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY 242 FEET, PLUS OR MINUS, TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 3, 300 FEET EASTERLY OF THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 3. ALSO EXCEPT THEREFROM THAT PORTION DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A POINT IN THE CENTER LINE OF BASE LINE AVENUE, 66 FEET WIDE, SAID POINT BEING NORTH 89 DEG. 47' 34" EAST, 1029.61~FEET ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF BASE LINE AVENUE FROM THE CENTER LINE INTERSECTION OF SAID BASE LINE AVENUE AND ETIWANDA AVENUE, AS SAID AVENUES ARE SHOWN ON THE RECORDED MAP OF SAID ETIWANDA COLONY LANDS; THENCE SOUTH 01 DEG. 11' 01" WEST, 370.02 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 01 DEG. 11' 01" WEST, 32.98 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 63 DEG. 48' 59" EAST, 114 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0 DEG. 40' 44" EAST, 54 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEG. 47' 34" EAST, 81.63 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0 DEG. 00' 34" WEST, 50.97 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY WITH A EXHIBIT "A" (CONTINUED) RADIUS OF 270 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 18 DEG. 42' 55", A DISTANCE OF 88.19 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEG. 47' 34" WEST, 169.60 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 3 WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF BASE LINE AVENUE, 66 FEET WIDE; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEG. 47' 34" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE OF BASE LINE, 199.54 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0 DEG. 00' 34" EAST, PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 3, 47.07 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 0 DEG. 00' 34" EAST, 129.93 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEG. 47' 34" WEST, PARALLEL TO THE CENTER LINE OF BASE LINE, 142.01 FEET; THENCE NORTH 1 DEG. 11' 01" EAST, 150.04 FEET TO A POINT THAT IS 60.00 FEET SOUTH OF THE CENTER LINE OF BASE LINE; THENCE NORTH 89 DEG. 47' 34" EAST, PARALLEL WITH THE CENTER LINE OF BASE LINE, 118.11 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 20.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGEL FO 90 DEG. 11' 52" AND A DISTANCE OF 31.48 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL NO. 2: THE EAST ¥2 OF LOT 6, BLOCK "R", ACCORDING TO THE PRELIMINARY MAP OF THE ETIWANDA COLONY LANDS, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 2 OF MAPS, PAGE(S) 24, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR FREEWAY PURPOSES IN A DEED RECORDED JUNE 19, 1973, IN BOOK 8207, PAGE 426, OFFICIAL RECORDS. PARCEL NO. 3: THAT PORTION OF LOT 3, BLOCK "R", ACCORDING TO THE PRELIMINARY MAP OF THE ETIWANDA COLONY LANDS, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 2 OF MAPS, PAGE(S) 24, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A POINT IN THE CENTER LINE OF BASE LINE AVENUE, 66 FEET WIDE, SAID POINT BEING NORTH 89 DEG. 47' 34" EAST, 1029.61 FEET ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF BASE LINE AVENUE FROM THE CENTER LINE INTERSECTION OF SAID BASE LINE AVENUE AND ETIWANDA AVENUE, SAID AVENUES ARE SHOWN ON THE RECORDED MAP OF SAID ETIWANDA COLONY LANDS; THENCE SOUTH 01 DEG. 11' 01" WEST, 370.02 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 01 DEG. 11' 01" WEST, 32.98 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 63 DEG. 48' 59" EAST, 114 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0 DEG. 40' 44" EAST, 54 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEG. 47' 34" EAST, 81.63 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0 DEG. 00' 34" WEST, 50.97 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY WITH A RADIUS OF 270 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 18 DEG. 42' 55", A DISTANCE OF 88.19 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEG. 47' 34" WEST, 169.60 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXHIBIT "A" (CONTINUED) PARCEL NO. 4: THAT PORTION OF LOT 3, BLOCK "R", ACCORDING TO THE PRELIMINARY MAP OF ETIWANDA COLONY LANDS, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 2 OF MAPS, PAGE(S) 24, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 3 WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF BASE LINE AVENUE, 66 FEET WIDE; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEG. 47' 34" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE OF BASE LINE, 198.54 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0 DEG. 00' 34" EAST, PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 3, 47.07 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 0 DEG. 00' 34" EAST, 129.93 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEG. 47' 34" WEST, PARALLEL TO THE CENTER LINE OF BASE LINE, 142.01 FEET; THENCE NORTH 1 DEG. 11' 01" EAST, 150.04 FEET TO A POINT THAT IS 60.00 FEET SOUTH OF THE CENTER LINE OF BASE LINE; THENCE NORTH 89 DEG. 47' 34" EAST, PARALLEL WITH THE CENTER LINE OF BASE LINE, 118.11 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 20.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90 DEG. 11' 52", A DISTANCE OF 31.46 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL NO. 5: PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 3928, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 37 OF PARCEL MAPS, PAGE(S) 28, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. PARCEL NO. 6: LOT 5, AND THE WEST Y2 OF LOT 6, BLOCK "R", ACCORDING TO THE PRELIMINARY MAP OF ETIWANDA COLONY LANDS, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 2 OF MAPS, PAGE(S) 24, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION OF LOT 5 DESCRIBED AS THE SOUTH 150 FEET OF THE WEST 200 FEET. PARCEL NO. 7: LOT 4, BLOCK "R", ACCORDING TO THE PRELIMINARY MAP OF ETIWANDA COLONY LANDS, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 2 OF MAPS, PAGE(S) 24, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. PARCEL NO. 11: LOTS 2 AND 7, BLOCK "R", ACCORDING TO THE PRELIMINARY MAP OF ETIWANDA COLONY LANDS, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 2 OF MAPS, PAGE(S) 24, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. EXHIBIT "A" (CONTINUED) EXCEPT THOSE PORTIONS OF LOT 2 AND 7, BLOCK "R", PRELIMINARY MAP OF ETIWANDA COLONY LANDS, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 2 OF MAPS, PAGE 24, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, AS CONTAINED IN THE FINAL ORDER OF CONDEMNATION FILED MARCH 31, 1975, 1N BOOK 8647, PAGE 607, OFFICIAL RECORDS, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 7; THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF LAST SAID LOT, NORTH 0 DEG. 03' 16" WEST, 262.55 FEET; THENCE NORTH 44 DEG. 47' 32" EAST, 569.25 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH A RADIUS OF 1200 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 22 DEG. 50' 02", A DISTANCE OF 478.23 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 2; THENCE ALONG SAID EAST LINE AND THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 7, SOUTH 0 DEG. 03' 31" EAST, 1061.11 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 7; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE, SOUTH 89 DEG. 48' 57" WEST, 663.24 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL NO. 12: THAT PORTION OF LOT 11, BLOCK "R", AS SHOWN ON PRELIMINARY MAP OF ETIWANDA COLONY LANDS, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 2 OF MAPS, PAGE(S) 24, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 11; THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT, NORTH 89 DEG. 48' 57" EAST, 401.51 FEET; THENCE COURSE "A", SOUTH 44 DEG. 47' 32" WEST 569.38 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT; THENCE ALONG SAID WEST LINE, NORTH 0 DEG. 3' 01" WEST, 402.78 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXHIBIT "A - ~ ~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. c] STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 8 ST~v1- L/Cfi-ITs 74- eA. ~Tg-£~T 7'~£~ .~0~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NORTil COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA 7'~./t~4-t:54- Exhibit B To Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2004/2005 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 9 (LOWER ETIWANDA): Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 (LMD #9) represents landscape sites throughout the Lower Etiwanda Area. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district, Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The various sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands and street trees. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): Street Light Maintenance District No. I (SLD #1)) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of streetlights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 (SOUTH ETIWANDA) Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 (SLD #8) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of streetlights and traffic signals located on local streets in what is termed the South Etiwanda area of the City. Generally, this area encompasses the area of the City east of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard and south of Highland Avenue within the incorporated area of the City. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the South Etiwanda area. Exhibit "B" continued Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2004/2005) For Project: TR 16454 Number of Lamps Street Lights 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L SLMD # 1 --- 15' - ........ SLMD # 2 59' - ........... Community Trail Turf Non-Turf Trees Landscaping DGSF SF SF EA LMD # 1 ...... 11,650* 59* *Existing items installed with original project (TR 16454-1 ) Assessment Units by District Parcel DU SLMD1 SLMD8 LMD9 --- 36 36 36 36 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2004/2005 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.9 (LOWER ETIWANDA): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $375.91 for the fiscal year 2004/05. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 (Lower Etiwanda): # of Physical Assessment # of Rate Per Units Units Factor Assessment Assessment Land Use Type Units Unit Revenue Single Family Parcel 269 1.0 269 $375.91 $101,119.79 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 16454)is: 36 Parcel x 1 A.U. Factor x $375.91 Rate Per A.U. = $13,532.76 Annual Assessment STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I (ARTERIAL STREETS) The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2004/05. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. I (Arterial Streets): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Family Parcel 19,803 1.00 19,803 $17.77 $351,899.31 Multi-Family Unit 7,402 1.00 7,402 $17.77 $131,533.54 Commercial Acre 2,288.82 2.00 4,577.64 $17.77 $81,344.66 TOTAL $564,777.51 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 16454) is: 36 Acres x 1 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $639.72 Annual Assessment STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 (SOUTH ETIWANDA) The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $193.75 for the Fiscal Year 2004/05. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda): # of Rate Per Physical # of Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Family Parcel 350 1.00 350 $193.75 $67,812.50 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 16454) is: 36 Parcels x 1.0 A.U. Factor x $193.75 Rate Per A.U. =- $6,975.00 Annual Assessment R A C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Sta Re ort TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Mark Brawthen, Contract Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, iMPROVEMENT SECURITY AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR SUBTT16545, LOCATED ON SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND BANYAN STREET, SUBMITTED BY CUCAMONGA VENTURES, LLC RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Tract No. 16545, accepting the subject agreement and securities, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 and authorizing the Mayor to sign said agreement and the City Clerk to cause said map to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tentative Tract No. 16545, located on southwest corner of Archiblad Avenue and Banyan Street in the Low Residential Development District, was approved by the Planning Commission on November 13, 2003 for the division of 3.10 acres into 10 lots. The Developer, Cucamonga Ventures, LLC, is submitting an agreement, securities and monumentation cash deposit to guarantee the construction of the public street improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond $171,600.00 Labor and Material Bond $ 85,800.00 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TRACT 16545 CUCAMONGA VENTURES, LLC August 4, 2004 Page 2 Copies of the agreement and securities are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully submitted, COMMUNITY DEPARTMENT SERVICES ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT W(lli,C'm O. O'Neil Cit~' Engineer WJO:MB:tch Attachments VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE LEMON A~IUE PROJECT SITE ~ lgTH STREET RANCHO CUCAMONGA NOT TO SCALE City of Item: TRACT NO. 16545 Rancho Cucamonga Title: VICINITY MAP ENGINEERING EXHIBIT: 1_ DIVISION RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 16545, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES WHEREAS, Tentative Tract No. 16545, submitted by Cucamonga Ventures, LLC, and consisting of a subdivision of 17.2 acres of land into 23 parcels, located on the west side of East Avenue, south of Wilson Avenue, in the Very Low Residential District (Etiwanda Specific Plan) was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on June 27, 2001; and WHEREAS, Tract No. 16545 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on the Tentative Tract Map; and WHEREAS, all the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met by posting the Improvement Securities by Cucamonga Ventures, LLC, as developer; and WHEREAS, said Developer submits for approval said Tract map offering for dedication, for street, highway and related purposes, the streets delineated thereon and the easements dedicated thereon for storm drain, sidewalk, street tree and landscape purposes. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and that said Tract No. 16545 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 2 FOR TRACT NO. 16545 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "72 Act"), said Landscape Maintenance District 1, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. I and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the 72 Act authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owner of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding the such provisions of the 72 Act related to the annexation of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Arlicle XIIID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the maintenance Districts on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 72 Act to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and RESOLUTION TR 16545 - CUCAMONGA VENTURES, LLC August 4, 2004 Page 2 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 72 Act and/or Article XIIID applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amount snot to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The above recitals are all true and correct SECTION 2: This City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determine in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvements. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property To Be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: CUCAMONGA VENTURES, LLC, The legal description of the Property is: Real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as follows: THE NORTH THREE HUNDRED SIXTY-FIVE (365) FEET OF LOT 1, AND THE NORTH THREE HUNDRED SIXTY-FIVE (365) FEET OF THE EAST FORTY-SiX AND TWO TENTHS (46.2) FEET OF LOT 2, TRACT 2051, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 22 OF MAPS, PAGE 36, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY APN: 1062-401-08-0-000 EXHIBIT "A" ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 2 BANYAN o STREET 5 ~ ~ 10 LoT ~ EXISTJb~ / Lo~ 18 TF~ACT 988d LEGEND 51- STREET CITY OF ~NCHO CUCAMONGA ~o~ COUNTY OF SA~ BE~A~I~O STATE OF CALIFO~IA T~ IG5~5 Exhibit B To Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2004/2005 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I (GENERAL CITY): Landscape Maintenance District No. I (LMD #1) represents 23.63 acres of landscape area, 41.88 acres of parks and 16.66 acres of community trails that are located at various sites throughout the City. These sites are not considered to be associated with any one particular area within the City, but rather benefit the entire City on a broader scale. As such, the parcels within this district do not represent a distinct district area as do the City's remaining LMD's. Typically parcels within this district have been annexed upon development The various sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, paseos, street trees, entry monuments, community trails and parks. The 41.88 acres of parks consist of Bear Gulch Park, East and West Beryl Park, Old Town Park, Church Street Park, Golden Oaks Park and the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I (ARTERIAL STREETS): Street Light Maintenance District No. I (SLD #1)) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (LOCAL STREETS): Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (SLD #2) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally, this area encompasses the residential area of the City west of Haven Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit this area of the City. This sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets generally west of Haven Avenue. Exhibit "B" continued Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 200412005) For Project: TR 16545 Number of Lamps Street Lights 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L SLMD # 1 5 ............ SLMD # 2 --- 2 ......... Community Trail Turf Non-Turf Trees Landscaping] DGSF SF SF EA LMD # 1 ...... 14,470 31 *Existing items installed with original project (TR 16545) Assessment Units by District Parcel DU SLMD1 SLMD2 LMD1 ...... 10 10 10 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2004/2005 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 (GENERAL CITY): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $92.21 for the fiscal year 2004/05. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. I (General City): # of Physical # of Rate Per Units Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Type Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Family Parcel 7699 1.0 7951 $92.21 $733,161.71 Multi-Family Units 7091 0.5 3570 $92.21 $329,189.70 Comm/Ind. Acre 2 1.0 2 $92.21 $184.42 TOTAL $1,062,535.83 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TRACT 16545) is: 10 Acres x 1.0 A.U. Factor x $92.21 Rate Per A.U. = $922.10 Annual Assessment STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2004/05. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Family Pamel 19,803 1.00 19,803 $17.77 $351,899.31 Multi-Family Unit 7,402 1.00 7,402 $17.77 $131,533.54 Commercial Acre 2,288.82 2.00 4,577.64 $17.77 $81,344.66 TOTAL $564,777.51 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TRACT 16545) is: 10 Units × 1 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $177.70 Annual Assessment STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (LOCAL STREETS): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $39.97 for the fiscal year 2004/05. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Family Parcel 6050 1.00 6050 $39.97 $241,818.50 Multi Family Unit 24 1.00 919 $39.97 $36,732.43 Commercial Acre 19.05 2.00 19.05 $39.97 $1,522.86 Total $280,073.79 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TRACT 16545) is: 10 Parcels/Acres x 1 A.U. Factor x $39.97 Rate Per A.U. = $399.70 Annual Assessment R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A DATE: August 4, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Direc/t~ Nielsen, Recreation Supervisor ~...~ BY: Nettie SUBJECT: APPROVAL FOR THE USE OF THE EXISTING SENIOR CENTER BUILDING FOR THEATRE ARTS PROGRAMMING DURING THE INTERIM TIME PERIOD BETWEEN THE OPENING OF THE NEW CENTRAL PARK SENIOR CENTER AND THE VICTORIA GARDENS CULTURAL CENTER RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the use of the existing Senior Center for Theatre Arts programming, effective January 1, 2005, or when current senior programs are relocated to Central Park. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The James Brulte Senior Center at Central Park is estimated to open for use by January 1, 2005. The existing Senior Center on Arrow Route will be vacated. The best potential temporary use for this space is Theatre Arts programming in preparation for the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center. This use would be temporary, during the interim time period between the opening of the new Central Park Senior Center and the opening of the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center. Staff has had the opportunity to develop a plan to successfully implement new arts programming and expand volunteer services in advance of moving into the Cultural Center. This plan provides programming space, and the ability to properly transition staff and equipment to the Cultural Center. Through new program revenues and the relocation of existing staff, this temporary use will not required any additional funds beyond what has been adopted in the 2004-2005 Recreation Fund Budget. The space will be vacated when the Cultural Center opens in 2006. City Council Approval of the Temporary Use of the Existing Senior Center as a Theatre Arts Center August 4, 2004 Page 2 PROGRAMMING PLAN/VISION Building community involvement in the performing arts, generating greater awareness and support of the future Cultural Center, and implementing new performing arts programs are the top priorities for the Theatre Arts Center. Community involvement and awareness strategies include focused marketing efforts, building and training a volunteer core and building a healthy array of professional instructors in all disciplines of performing arts. New programming opportunities, which will be carried over to the Cultural Center, include instruction in such areas acting, improvisation, musical theatre, costuming, make-up, scenic art and set construction, and a teen theatre program. These programs will be fee based and have already been adopted in the 2004-2005 Recreation Fund Budget in Community Services. Small-scale stage productions will also be offered at the center to begin sampling and building an audience base. The venue provides the ideal setting for students of the performing arts to interact, learn their craft and build community support for the Cultural Center. Existing Cultural Arts staff will be stationed at the building to supervise program operations. When the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center opens in 2006 we will have had the opportunity to create a volunteer force which will be essential to our operations, establish relationships within the community, build a rapport with our professional instructors and school representatives, sample our target audience for programming preferences, build our audience base and heighten awareness and excitement for the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center. Res~ !ally subrrti~t~d~ Kevin Ardle Commu~ lity Services Director T H E C I T Y O F I~AN C H 0 C LICAPl 0 N GA Staff Report DALE: August 4, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Diane Young, Records Coordinator ~U~/ SUBJECT: Destruction of City Records RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached Resolution authorizing the destruction of City records pursuant to California Government Code Section 34090, the City's Records Retention Schedule, and other applicable legal citations. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The records in the attached destruction requests have met their required retention as listed in the City's Records Retention Schedule, and are due for final disposition. The records have been reviewed and approved for destruction by the Department representatives, the Department Head and the City Attorney. DMY (Attachments as noted) Resolution No. 04-*** Page 1 RESOLUTION NO. 04-*~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF CITY RECORDS WHICH ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED AS SET FORTH IN CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 34090 AND OTHER APPLICABLE LEGAL REFERENCES WHEREAS, it has been determined that certain City records have been retained in compliance with all applicable Federal, State and local statutes; and WHEREAS, said City records have met their useful life and are no longer required for public or private purposes: WHEREAS, destruction of said records is necessary to conserve storage space, increase staff productivity, a nd maintain conformance with the City's Records Management Policy; and WHEREAS, said records as listed in Exhibit "A" attached hereto have been approved for destruction by the City Attorney; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: That approval and authorization is hereby given to destroy those records described as Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof. Resolution No. 04-*** Page 2 SECTION 2: That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution, and thenceforth and thereafter the same shall be in full force and effect. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 4th day of August, 2004 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: William J. Alexander, Mayor ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 4th day of August, 2004. Executed this 5th day of August, 2004, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk Resolution N~-~**~age-3 EXHIBIT 'A' Records Destruction Authorizations for the following Departments / Divisions City Manager Personnel Finance Planning Community Services Engineering/Admin Nol~ification Number Destruction Notification Report 05/25/2004 lS~ City of Rancho Cucamonga (RC) 10:14:33 i Records Management Division (TMP) ~) I CZTY MANAGER (4122) Bil~to Name: (4122) Re~ords Coordinator: KENDRENA, DONNA Hail Code: Phone: (909)477-2700 ext: 2015 ]The/following records are due for destruction on 6/30/2004. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide a memo justtfylng the hold. / ,. _ . iDestroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy (X)[Code Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beg. Ending Hold? 06/30/2004 Location Space# '/ Archive ~ 2459 1020.4 Newspaper Articles 02/01/2000 03/31/2001 03/31/2004 v3-03-02 2 Bo o~. wspaper Olpping~ (2/]/00 - 3/31/01) E =lExcluded Eligible Boxes on Hold = 0 ~ Elgibile Boxes Checked Out = 0 Elgibile Boxes Excepted = 0 Boxes to be Destroyed for this Department = 1 ( Excluding boxes on hold or boxes with folders on hold or checked out, and excluding boxes selected for exception ) Date ~ua~e Baker, Asst to City Mgr Date / Jac~tam, City~anaCr Date Jim Markman, City Attorney Page I ~ * "' 05/25/2004 No~ificat on Number Destruction Notification Report Records Management Division (TMP) PERSONNEL (4124) Bill to Name= (4124} Records Coordinator= Chris Pittenger Hail Code.' Phone= (909)477-2700 ext= 2411 Th~ following records are due for destruction on 6/30/2004. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide a memo justifying the hold. / RE~URN THE SIGNED LIST TO THE RECORDS DIVISION BY 3UNE 15, 2004. Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beg. Ending Hold? 06/30/2004 Location Space# Shred 2231 5010.2 Individual Personnel Folders 01/01/1995 04/30/1999 04/30/2004 03-02-02 5 Box Contents: Inactive Personnel Files 1/95 - 4/99 Excluded Eligible Boxes on Hold Elgibi[e Boxes Checked Out Elgibile Boxes Excepted Boxes to be Destroyed for this Department ( Excluding boxes on hold or boxes with folders on hold or checked out, and excluding boxes selected for exception ) ]1 IL. I Date Persr -Date ' Larry Temple, Adm Svcs Dir Date / .Jim i~la~fi~man, City Attorney Page I Not fication Number Destruction Notification Report 05/25/2004 lsg City of Rancho Cucamonga (RC) 10:15:01 Records I~lanagement Division (TMP) ~ FINANCE (4151) 3ill,to Name: (4151) ~,ecprds/Coordinator: LAYNE~ TAHARA Hail Code: Phone: (909)477-2700 ext: 2430 Th~following[ records are due for destruction on 6/30/2004. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide a memo justifying the hold. / RETURN THE SIGNED LIST TO THE RECORDS DIV[SZON BY 3UNE 15, 2004. I On Destroy ~estroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates (X)~ode Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beg. Ending Hold? 06/30/2004 Location Space# t~'~ Lg78 4012.0 :~0~¢~.¢-t ~}=u.~.~'~ 07/0t/1993 06/30/1995 06/30/2004 02-02-02 4 Box Contents'..lournals Alt. Folder Cf Alt. Folder Number Description Beginning Date Ending Date Record Title Name 3 Trial Balance Journal 07/01/1993 06/30/~994 4 Encumbrance Journal 07/01/1994 06/30/1995 S~[.- 1979 4012.8 ~0~-~'~-\ %/0L~C~'~A~ 07/01/1994 06/30/1995 06/30/2004 02-02-01 1 I 4 95 BOX Contents: .Journals, Ledgers 99 - Alt. Folder # Alt. Folder Number Description Beginning Date Ending Date Record Title Name 3 Treasury Report 07/01/i994 06/30/~995 1955 4010.1 Accounts Payable 07/01/1996 06/30/1997 06/30/2004 07-03-01 1 Box Contents: A/P 1996-97 (C Misc- Cyborg) 1956 4010.1 Accounts Payable 07/01/1996 06/30/1997 06/30/2004 07-03-01 2 Box Contents: A/P 1996-97 (Best Buy - Byrd) hred 1957 4010.1 Accounts Payable O7/01/1996 O6/30/1997 06/30/2004 O7-O3-01 3 Box Contents: A/P [996-97 (Albertson's - Bemell) hred 1958 4010.1 Accounts Payable 07/01/1996 06/30/1997 06/30/2004 07-03-01 5 Box Contents: A/P 1996-97 (A Misc - Airtouch Cellular) ;hred 1965 4010.1 Accounts Payable O7/O1/1996 06/30/1997 06/30/2004 02-03-02 3 Box Contents: A/P 1996-97 (I Misc ~ ]on) ' ' Date ' 3im Mai'kmart, City Attorney Date Tamara Layne, Cl~icer Date Larry Temple~ Adm Svcs Dir Page I .I . Notlification Number Destruction Notification Report 05/2S/2004 ~ 10:15:01 16~ City of Rancho Cucamonga (RC) Records Management Division (TMP) FZNANCE (4151) Bii to Name: (4151) Re~ords Coordinator: LAYNE, TAMARA Mail Code: Phone: (909)477-2700 ext: 2430 Th~ following records are due for destruction on 6/30/2004. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of E~CH page. Zf you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide a memo justifying the hold. RE,TURN THE St*GNED Lt*ST TO THE RECORDS DIIVZSION BY IUNE 15, 2004. Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy Code Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beg. Ending Hold? 06/30/2004 Location Space# ;hred 1965 4010.1 Accounts Payable 07/01/1996 06/30/1997 06/30/2004 02-03-02 3 Box Contents: A/P 1996-97 (I Misc - ~on) ;hred 1966 4010.1 Accounts Payable 07/01/1996 06/30/1997 06/30/2004 02-03-02 1 Box Contents: A/P 1996-97 (Luc - Mark) 1967 4010.1 Accounts Payable 07/01/1996 06/30/1997 06/30/2004 02-03-02 5 Box Contents: A/P 1996-97 (Mars - Oran) ;bred 1969 4010.1 Accounts Payable 07/01/1996 06/30/1997 06/30/2004 05-02-03 1 Box Contents: A/P 1996-97 (Office Depot) 1970 4010.1 Accounts Payable 07/01/1996 06/30/1997 06/30/2004 07-02-03 4 Box Contents: A/P 1996-97 (Exc - Gyp) 1972 4010.1 Accounts Payable 07/01/1996 06/30/1997 06/30/2004 02-03-02 4 Box Contents: A/P 1996-97 (D Mist - Ew) 1983 4010.1 Accounts Payable 07/01/lg96 06/30/1997 06/30/2004 04-01-03 6 Box Contents: A/P 1996-97 (Pru*Res) ;hred 1984 4010.1 Accounts Payable 07/01/1996 06/30/1997 06/30/2004 04-01-03 4 Box Contents: A/P 1996-97 (Recreation refunds) Date Tam.ne, Fin Officer Date ' Larry Te , ~ I~a[~ / 3im~i~arkman~ City Attorney Page 2 ! N~t~ficati~n Number Destruction Notification Report 05/25/2004 ~ 10:15:01 151 City of Rancho Cucamonga (RC) ~ Records Management Division (TMP) FINANCE (4151) Bil to Name: (4151) Reeords Coordinator: LAYNE, TAMARA Mail Code: Phone: (909)477-2700 ext: 2430 Th~ following records are due for destruction on 6/30/2004. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. Zfyou want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide a memo justifying the hold. / RE~URN THE SIGNED LlrST TO THE RECORDS DTVISION BY 1UNE 15, 2004. Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beg. Ending Hold? 06/30/2004 Location Space# Shred 1984 4010.1 Accounts Payable 07/01/1996 06/30/1997 06/30/2004 04-01-03 4 Box Contents: A/P 1996-97 (Recreation refunds) ;hred 1985 4010.1 Accounts Payable 07/01/1996 06/30/1997 06/30/2004 04-01-03 5 Box Contents: A/P 1996-97 (Onc- Pro) ihred 1986 4010.1 Accounts Payable 07/01/1996 06/30/1997 06/30/2004 04-02-02 6 Box Contents: A/P 1996-97 (Recr & BusLic refunds) Shred 1996 4010,1 Accounts Payable 07/01/1996 06/30/1997 06/30/2004 04-01-03 1 Box Contents: A/P 1996-97 (Edison & petty cash) Shred 1997 4010.1 Accounts Payable 07/01/1996 06/30/1997 06/30/2004 07-04-03 2 Box Contents: A/P 1996-97 (Recr & BUS Lic refunds) Shred 1998 4010.1 Accounts Payable 07/01/1996 06/30/1997 06/30/2004 03-02-01 2 BOX Contents: A/P 1996-97 (Thor - Visa) Shred 1999 4010.1 Accounts Payable 07/0;I./1996 06/30/1997 06/:30/2004 07-04-02 :3 Box Contents: A/P 1996-97 (Rho - Shi) ;bred 2000 4010.1 Accounts Payable 07/01/1996 06/:30/1997 06/30/2004 03-01-02 6 Box Contents: A/P ~,996-97 (Sie- Ter) I, ,? 7, I Fin Officer Date Larry Temple, Adrm-S~cs Dir Date ! .lira Markman, City Attorney Page 3 / N~ificati~n Number Destruction Notification Report 05/25/2004 159i City of Rancho Cucamonga (AC) lO:15:o2 Records Management Division (TMP) FINANCE (4151) to Name: (4151) ards Coordinator: LAYNE~ TAHARA Mail Code: Phone: (909)477-2700 ext: 2430 ; following records are due for destruction on 6/30/2004. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide a memo justifying the hold. RE~URN THE STGNED LI'ST TO THE RECORDS DIV][SION BY 3UNE 1S~ 2004. Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy Code Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beg. Ending Hold? 06/30/2004 Location Space# 3hred 2000 4010.1 Accounts Payable 07/01/1996 06/30/1997 06/30/2004 03-01-02 6 Box Contents: A/P 1996-97 (Sie- Ter) ;bred 2001 4010.1 Accounts Payable 07/01/1996 06/30/1997 06/30/2004 03-01-02 S Box Contents: A/P 1996-97 (Visi- ZOU) Shred 2002 4010.1 Accounts Payable 07/01/1996 06/30/1997 06/30/2004 03-02-01 3 Box Contents: A/P 1996-97 (So Cai Edison) --Shred 2003 4010.1 Accounts Payable 07/01/1996 06/30/1997 06/30/2004 03-02-01 Box Contents: A/P 1996-97 (Recr 8* Bus Lic refunds) Shred 2097 4010.1 Accounts Payable 07/01/1996 06/30/1997 06/30/2004 04-03-02 6 Box Contents: A/P 1996-97 (GTE Calif) 2098 4010.1 Accounts Payable 07/01/1996 06/30/1997 06/30/2004 04-02-02 1 Box Contents: A/P 1996-97 (Cuca CO. Water Dlst) 2332 4010.1 Accounts Payable 07/01/1996 06/30/1997 06/30/2004 07-08-03 2 Box Contents: YTD Payments by Vendor (FY 96/97) Shred 23:33 4010.1 Accounts Payable 01/01/1997 06/30/1997 06/30/2004 07-08-03 3 Box Contents: Demand Warrant Register (1/97 - 6/97) Date Fin Officer Date Larry Temple, cs Dir Date 3irfi Markman, City Attorney Page 4 .r Notification Number Destruction Notification Report 05/25/2004 tss City of Rancho Cucamonga (RC) 10:15:02 Records Management Division (TMP) F/NANCE (4151) E3il~ :o Name: (4151) F~:~ ~rds Coordinator: LAYNE, TAHARA Hail Code: Phone: (g09)477-2700 ext: 2430 l*h~ following records are due for destruction on 6/30/2004. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide a memo justifying the hold. RE~fURN THE STGNED L]~ST TO THE RECORDS Drv/sroN BY .JUNE 15, 2004. Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beg. Ending Hold? 06/30/2004 Location Space# ~hred 2333 4010.1 Accounts Payable 01/01/1997 06/30/1997 06/30/2004 07-08-03 3 Box Contents: Demand Warrant Register (1/97 - 6/97) Shred 2334 4010.1 Accounts Payable 07/01/1996 06/30/1991 06/30/2004* 07-08-03 4 Box Contents: YTD Payable Project Posting (FY96/97) 2043 4050.3 Bond Statement Files 07/01/1991 06/30/1994 YES 06/30/2004 03-03-01 1 BOXRECORD TITLE #4050.3 ON HOLD / FOLDER #1 RECORD TZTLE #4050.3 ON HOLD / Box Contents: Bond Bank Struts (7/1991 - 6/1994) Alt. Folder # Alt. Folder Number Description Beginning Date Ending Date Record Title Name 1 ~** Retain for life of bond before destruction *** 07/01/1991 06/30/1994 Bond Statement Files 2 RDA 1994 tax allocation refunding 07/01/1991 06/30/1994 Bond Statement Files 3 City - Escrow for Trust #79954 07/01/1991 06/30/1994 Bond Statement Files 4 RDA (No fuCcher description) 07/01/1991 06/30/1994 Bond Statement Files 5 CFD 84-1 - Special Tax Bonds Series A 07/01/1991 06/30/1994 Bond Statement Files 6 RDA Project 1986 & 1987 Series A' 07/01/1991 06/30/1994 Bond Statement Files 7 Escrow for 1984 Series A Trust #79504 07/01/1991 06/30/1994 Bond Statement Files 8 City - 1988 Ced: of Participation 07/01/1991 06/30/1994 Bond Statement Files 9 Northeast Corem Park Project - C.O.P's 07/01/1991 06/30/1994 Bond Statement Files 10 RDA Escrow for Series 1986 Trust #79774 07/01/1991 06/30/1994 Bond Statement Files 11 RDA Escrow for Series 1987 Trust #79774 07/01/1991 06/30/1994 Bond Statement Files 12 RDA Escrow for Trust #79873 07/01/1991 06/30/1994 Bond Statement Files 13 City - Nortgage Rev Bonds 1984 Series A 07/01/1991 06/30/1994 Bond Statement Files Date Fin Officer Date Larry Ted~e, A~vcs ~ D~te * 3im~arkman, City Attorney Page 5 No ification Number Destruction Notification Report 05/25/2004 City of Rancho Cucamonga (RC) 10:1s:o2 Records Management Division (TMP) FZNANCE (4151) toName: (4151) )rds Coordinator: LAYNE, TAMARA Mail Code: Phone: (909)477-2700 ext: 2430 ~ following records are due for destruction on 6/30/2004. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of ;N page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide a memo justifying the hold. THE RECORDS Dt'VI'SlrON BY 1UNE 15r 2004. Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy Box Number~_~Code (Box Contents) Beg. Ending Hold? 06/30/2004 Location Space# ~043 ~.~'~1~050.3 Bond Statement Files 07/01/1991 06/30/1994 YES 06/30/2004 03-03-01 BOXRECORD TITLE #4050.3 ON HOLD / FOLDER #1 RECORD TZTLE #4050.3 ON HOLD / Box Contents: Bond Bank Struts (7/1991 - 6/1994) Alt. Folder # Alt. Folder Number Description Beginning Date Ending Date Record Title Name 14 RDA Mortgage Rev Bonds 1984 Series A 07/01/1991 06/30/1994 Bond Statement Files 15 R.C./Palmdale/Porterville/Colton Mor Rev Bonds '84 Series A 07/01/1991 06/30/1994 Bond Statement Files 16 West End Communications 1991 Rev Bonds A & B 07/01/1991 06/30/1994 Bond Statement Files 2355 4030.6 Cancelled Checks (Non-RDA or Fire) 11/04/1998 03/31/1999 03/31/2004 03-03-03 4 Box Contents: A/P Canceled Checks (1/99 - 3/99) Alt. Folder # Alt. Folder Number Description Beginning Date Ending Date Record Title Name 1 Check Numbers 133400 - 137999 11/04/1998 03/31/1999 Cancelled Checks (Non-RDA or Fire) lhred 2623 4030.6 Cancelled Checks (Non-RDA or Fire) 03/31/1999 06/09/1999 06/09/2004 02-03-03 13 Box Contents: A/P Canceled Checks (3/99 - 6/99) Alt. Folder # Alt. Folder Number Description Beginning Date Ending Date Record Title Name i Check #'s 138000 thru 140299 03/31/1999 06/09/1999 Cancelled Checks (Non-RDA or Fire) Shred 2690 4030.6 Cancelled Checks (Non-RDA or Fire) 09/03/1958 02/04/1999 02/04/2004 02-02-03 10 Box Contents: Payroll Canceled Checks (9/98 -'2/99) Alt. Folder # Alt. Folder Number Description Beginning Date Ending Date Record Title Name i Check number~ 131100 thru 133899 09/03/1998 02/04/1999 Cancelled Checks (Non-RDA or Fire) 1599 4020.3 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 01/03/1995 02/07/1995 02/07/2004 00-02-02 6 Date Fin Officer Date Larry Tern Ad Date .li · ar man, city Attorney Page 6 Number Destruction Notification Report 05/25/2004 City of Rancho Cucamonga (RC) 10:15:02 Records Management Division (TMP) FINANCE (4151) (4151) Coordinator: LAYNE, TAMARA Mail Code: Phone: (909)477-2700 ext: 2430 records are due for destruction on 6/30/2004. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to be destroyed, then sign &. date the bottom of If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide a memo justifying the hold. S]~GNED LlrST TO THE RECORDS Dr*vi'SION BY 1UNE 15, 2004. Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beg. Ending Hold? 06/30/2004 Location Space# 1599 4020.3 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 01/03/1995 02/07/1995 02/07/2004 08-02-02 e Folder # Alt. Folder Number Description Beginning Date Ending Date Recdrd Title Name I RECEIPT # 22762 THRU 23854 01/03/1995 02/07/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 2 DATED: 01/03/95 01/03/1995 02/07/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 3 DATED: 01/09/95 01/03/1995 02/07/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 4 DATED: 01/04/95 01/03/1995 02/07/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 5 DATED: 01/05/95 01/03/1995 02/07/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Flies 6 DATED: 01/09/95 01/03/1995 02/07/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 7 DATED: 01/10/95 01/03/1995 02/07/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 8 DATED: 01/11/95 01/03/1995 02/07/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 9 DATED: 01/12/95 01/03/1995 02/07/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 10 DATED: 01/16/95 01/03/1995 02/07/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 11 DATED: 01/17/95 01/03/1995 02/07/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Piles 12 DATED: 01/18/95 01/03/1995 02/07/1995 Dally Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 13 DATED: 01/19/95 01/03/1995 02/07/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 14 DATED: 01/23/95 01/03/1995 02/07/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Flies 15 DATED: 01/24/95 01/03/1995 02/07/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 16 DATED: 01/25/95 01/03/1995 02/07/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 17 DATED: 01/26/95 01/03/1995 02/07/1995 Dally Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 18 DATED: 01/30/95 01/03/1995 02/07/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 19 DATED: 01/31/95 01/03/1995 02/07/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 20 DATED: 02/01/95 01/03/1995 02/07/1995 Dally Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 21 DATED: 02/02/95 01/03/1995 02/07/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 22 DATED: 02/06/95 01/03/1995 02/07/1995 Daily Cash Receipts/ Revenue Files Date Larry Temple, A-~ffi Svcs Dir D'ate' 31m Markman, City Attorney Fin Officer Page 7 N~tlificati~n Number Destruction Notification Report 05/25/2004 City of Rancho Cucamonga (AC) lO:1S:O2 151 Records Management Division (TMP) / FINANCE (4151) Bil~to Name: (4151) Re~ords Coordinator: LAYNE, TAMARA Mail Code: Phone: (909)477-2700 ext: 2430 . Th~~following records are due for destruction on 6/30/2004. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide a memo justifying the hold. RE,TURN THE SZGNED LZST TO THE RECORDS DI'VI'SlrON BY ,1UNE 15, 2004. Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beg. Ending Hold? 06/30/2004 Location Space# 1599(~o~'~020.3 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 01/03/1995 02/07/1995 02/07/2004 08-02-02 6 Alt. Folder # Alt. Folder Number Description Beginning Date Ending Date Record Title Name 23 DATED: 02/07/95 01/03/1995 02/07/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files ;hred 1600 4020.3 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 03/27/1995 05/02/1995 05/02/2004 08-02-02 1 Alt, Folder # Alt. Folder Number Description Beginning Date Ending Date Record Title Name 1 RECEIPT # 25293 THRU 26593 03/27/1995 05/02/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 2 DATED: 03/27/95 03/27/1995 05/02/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 3 DATED: 03/28/95 03/27/1995 05/02/1995 Dally Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 4 DATED: 03/29/95 03/27/1995 05/02/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 5 DATED: 03/30/95 03/27/1995 05/02/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 6 DATED: 04/03/95 03/27/1995 05/02/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 7 DATED: 04/04/95 03/27/1995 05/02/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 8 DATED: 04/05/95 03/27/1995 05/02/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 9 DATED: 04/06/95 03/27/1995 05/02/1995 Dally Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 10 DATED: 04/10/95 03/27/1995 05/02/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 11 DATED: 04/11/95 03/27/1995 05/02/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 12 DATED: 04/12/95 03/27/1995 05/02/1995 Dally Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 13 DATED; 04/13/95 03/27/1995 OS/02/1995 Daily Cash Recelpts / Revenue Files 14 DATED: 04/17/95 03/27/1995 05/02/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 15 DATED: 04/18/95 03/27/1995 05/02/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 16 DATED: 04/19/95 03/27/1995 05/02/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 17 DATED: 04/20/95 03/27/1995 05/02/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 18 DATED: 04/24/95 03/27/1995 05/02/1995 Daily Cash Receipts/ Revenue Files Date Fin Officer Date Larry T~afl~'lJle~.~ S~cs ~f~r Date 3im Markman, City Attorney Page 8 Number Destruction Notification Report 05/25/2004 City of Rancho Cucamonga (RC) 1o:15:o2 Records Management Division (TMP) (~ FINANCE (4151) ~ (4151) Coordinator: LAYNE, TAHARA Mail Code: Phone: (909)477-2700 ext: 2430 following records are due for destruction on 6/30/2004. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of if you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide a memo justifying the hold. SZGNED LZST TO THE RECORDS DZVlrSTON BY .1UNE 15, 2004. Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy Box N.umber~Code (Box Contents) Beg. Ending Hold? 06/30/2004 Location Space# 1600~_~*~'~t020.3 Dally Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 03/27/1995 05/02/1995 05/02/2004 08-02-02 1 Folder # Alt. Folder Number Description Beginning Date Ending Date Record Title Name 19 DATED: 04/25/95 03/27/1995 05/02/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 20 DATED: 04/26/95 03/27/1995 05/02/1995 Dally Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 21 DATED: 04/27/95 03/27/1995 05/02/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 22 DATED: 05/01/95 03/27/1995 05/02/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 23 DATED: 08/02/95 03/27/1995 05/02/1995 Dai~y Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 1601 4020.3 Dally Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 02/08/1995 03/23/1995 03/23/2004 08-02-02 2 Folder # Alt, Folder Number Description Beglnntng Date Ending Date Record Title Name I RECEIPT # 23855 THRU 25292 02/08/1995 03/23/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Flies 2 DATED: 02/08/95 02/08/1995 03/23/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 3 DATED: 02/09/95 02/08/1995 03/23/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 4 DATED: 02/13/95 02/08/1995 03/23/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 5 DATED: 02/14/95 02/08/1995 03/23/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 6 DATED: 02/15/95 02/08/1995 03/23/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 7 DATED: 02/16/95 02/08/1995 03/23/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 8 DATED: 02/21/95 02/08/1995 03/23/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 9 DATED: 02/22/95 02/08/1995 03/23/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 10 DATED: 02/23/95 02/08/1995 03/23/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 11 DATED: 02/27/95 02/08/1995 03/23/1995 Dally Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 12 DATED: 02/28/95 02/08/1995 03/23/1995 Dally Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 13 DATED: 03/01/95 02/08/1995 03/23/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 14 DATED: 03/02/95 02/08/1995 03/23/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files T~ple, d~ Svcs Oir Date 3il Markman, City Attorney Fin Officer Date Larry Page 9 Number Destruction Notification Report 05/25/2004 City of Rancho Cucamonga (RC) 10:15:02 Records Management Division (TMP) FZNANCE (4151) (4151) Coordinator: LAYNE, TAMARA Hail Code: Phone: (909)477-2700 ext: 2430 following/ records are due for destruction on 6/30/2004. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide a memo justifying the hold. SZGNED LI'ST TO THE RECORDS D/VTS1[ON BY 1UNE 15, 2004. Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beg. Ending Hold? 06/30/2004 Location Space# % 1601C(L%'1%~'~/,.~020,3 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 02/08/1995 03/23/1995 03/23/2004 08-02-02 Folder # Alt, Folder Number Description Beginning Date Ending Date Record Title Name 15 DATED: 03/06/95 02/08/1995 03/23/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 16 DATED: 03/07/95 02/08/1995 03/23/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 17 DATED: 03/08/95 02/08/1995 03/23/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 18 DATED: 03/09/95 02/08/1995 03/23/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 19 DATED: 03/13/95 02/08/1995 03/23/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 20 DATED: 03/14/95 02/08/1995 03/23/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 21 DATED: 03/15/95 02/08/1995 03/23/1995 Dally Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 22 DATED: 03/16/95 02/08/1995 03/23/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 23 DATED: 03/20/95 02/08/1995 03/23/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 24 DATED: 03/21/95 02/08/1995 03/23/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 25 DATED: 03/22/95 02/08/1995 03/23/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 26 DATED: 03/23/95 02/08/1995 03/23/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 1602 4020.3 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 06/01/1995 06/30/1995 06/30/2004 08-02-02 3 Folder # Alt. Folder Number Description Beginning Date Ending Date Record Title Name 1 RECEIPT # 27616 THRU 28706 06/01/1995 06/30/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 2 OATED: 06/01/95 06/01/1995 06/30/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 3 DATED: 06/05/95 06/01/1995 06/30/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 4 DATED: 06/06/95 06/01/1995 06/30/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 5 DATED: 06/07/95 06/01/1995 06/30/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 6 DATED: 06/08/95 06/01/1995 06/30/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 7 DATED: 06/08/95 06/01/1995 06/30/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files ~ne, Fin Officer Date Larry Templ~e, A~vc-~ DY ~"' Date ~ 3im Harkman, City Attorney Page 10 NoTification Number Destruction Notification Report 05/25/2004 151 City of Rancho Cucamonga (RC) 10:15:0~ Records Management Division (TrflP) F/NANCE (4151) Bil~ to Name: (4151) Re~ords Coordinator: LAYNE, TAHARA Hail Code: Phone: (909)477-2700 ext: 2430 e following records are due for destruction on 6/30/2004. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide a memo justifying the hold. 3NED LIST TO THE RECORDS DTVZSION BY 3UNE 15~ 2004. Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy Code Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beg. Ending Hold? 06/30/2004 Location Space# :/.602 C~'~020.3 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 06/0:L//.995 06/30/1995 06/30/2004 08-02-02 3 Alt. Folder # Alt. Folder Number Description Beginning Date Ending Date Record Title Name 8 DATED: 06/12/95 06/01/1995 06/30/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 9 DATED: 06/13/95 06/01/1995 06/30/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 10 DATED: 06/14/95 06/01/1995 06/30/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 11 DATED: 06/15/95 06/01/1995 06/30/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 12 DATED: 06/19/95 06/01/1995 06/30/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 13 DATED: 06/20/95 06/01/1995 06/30/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 14 DATED: 06/21/95 06/01/1995 06/30/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files IS DATED: 06/22/95 06/01/1995 06/30/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 16 DATED: 06/26/95 06/01/1995 06/30/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 17 DATED: 06/27/95 06/01/1995 06/30/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 18 DATED: 06/28/95 06/01/1995 06/30/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 19 DATED: 06/29/95 06/01/1995 06/30/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 11.604 4020.3 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 05/03/1995 05/3/./1995 05/3~./2004 08-02-02 5 Alt. Folder # Alt. Folder Number Description Beginning Date Ending Date Record Title Name I RECEIPT # 26594 THRU 27615 05/03/1995 05/31/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 2 DATED: 05/03/95 05/03/1995 05/31/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 3 DATED: 05/04/95 05/03/1995 05/31/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 4 DATED: 05/08/95 05/03/1995 05/31/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 5 DATED: 05/09/95 05/03/1995 05/31/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 6 DATED: 05/10/95 05/03/1995 05/31/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 7 DATED: 05/11/95 05/03/1995 05/31/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files Date Fin Officer Date Larry Temple, Adh~/'cs Oir Date 3i~/Harkman, City Attorney Page 11 Number Destruction Notification Report 05/25/2004 City of Rancho Cucamonga (AC) lO:1S:O2 Records Management Division (TMP) FINANCE (4151) (4151) Coordinator: LAYNE, TAMARA Nail Code: Phone: (909)477-2700 ext: 2430 ' following records are due for destruction on 6/30/2004. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide a memo justifying the hold. SIGNED LIST TO THE RECORDS DIVISION BY JUNE let 2004. Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beg. Ending Hold? 06/30/2004 Location Space# 1604~'~.%)4020.3 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 05/03/1995 05/31/1995 05/31/2004 08~02-02 5 Folder # Alt. Folder Number Description Beginning Date Ending Date Record Title Name 8 DATED: 05/15/95 05/03/1995 05/31/1995 Daily Cash Recei its / Revenue Files 9 DATED:, 05/16/95 05/03/1995 05/31/1995 Daily Cash Recei its / Revenue Files 10 DATED: 05/17/95 05/03/1995 05/31/1995 Daily Cash Recei )ts / Revenue Files 11 DATED: 05/18/95 05/03/1995 05/31/1995 Daily Cash Recel its / Revenue Files 12 DATED: 05/22/95 05/03/1995 05/31/1995 Daily Cash Recei Its / Revenue Files 13 DATED: 05/23/95 05/03/1995 05/31/1995 Daily Cash Recei its / Revenue Files 14 DATED: 05/24/95 05/03/1995 05/31/1995 Daily Cash Recei its / Revenue Files 15 DATED: 05/25/95 05/03/1995 05/31/1995 Daily Cash Recei )ts / Revenue Files 16 DATED: 05/29/95 05/03/1995 05/31/1995 Daily Cash Recei )ts / Revenue Files 17 DATED: 05/30/95 05/03/1995 05/31/1995 Daily Cash Recei )ts / Revenue Files 18 DATED: 05/31/95 05/03/1995 05/31/1995 Daily Cash Recei ~ts / Revenue Files 2147 4020.3 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 07/01/1994 06/30/1995 06/30/2004 07-07-02 1 Contents: Cash rec journals from Quadrant 94/95 Folder # Alt. Folder Number Description Beginning Date Ending Date Record Title Name I Daily cash receipts journal 7/94 - 8/94 07/01/1994 06/30/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 2 Daily cash receipts journal 9/94 - 10/94 07/01/1994 06/30/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 3 Daily cash receipts journal 11/94 - 12/94 07/01/1994 06/30/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 4 Daily cash receipts journal 1/95 - 2/95 07/01/1994 06/30/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 5 Daily cash receipts journal 3/95 - 4/95 07/01/1994 06/30/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 6 Daily cash receipts journal 5/95 - 6/95 07/01/1994 06/30/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 1976 4012.8 General Ledger & Postings 07/01/1994 06/30/1995 06/30/2004 07-05-01 6 Contents: Ledgers, 3ournals Folder # Alt. Folder Number Description Beginning Oate Ending Date Record TiUe Name Fin Officer Date Larr Dir Date larkman, City Attorney Page 12 Nol iflcation Number Destruction Notification Report 05/25/2004 15; City of Rancho Cucamonga (RC) lO:15:02 Records Management Division (TMP) FINANCE (4151) Bill :o Name: (4151) Re* ords Coordinator: LAYNE, TAMARA Mail Code: Phone: (909)477-2700 ext: 2430 Th E following records are due for destruction on 6/30/2004. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EA CH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide a memo justifying the hold. RE]TURN THE SIGNED LIST TO THE RECORDS DIVISION BY.~UNE 15, 2004. Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy IX/Code Box Number Code (Sox Contents) Beg. Ending Hold? 06/30/2004 Location Space# £..c../~.~..yc 1976 012.8 General Ledger & Postings 07/01/1994 06/30/1995 06/30/2004 07-05-01 o Box Contents: Ledgers, Journals Alt. Folder # Att. Folder Number Description Beginning Date Ending Date Record Title Name 1 Expenditure Ledger 07/01/1994 06/30/1995 General Ledger & Postings 2 Expenditure [edgers & 07701/1994 06/30/1995 General Ledger & Postings ~can/Recyc 1979 4012.8 General Ledger & Postings 07/01/1994 06/30/1995 06/30/2004 02-02-01 1 Box Contents: Journals, Ledgers 1994~95 Alt. Folder # Alt. Folder Number Description Beginning Date Ending Date Record Title Name 5 General Ledger 07/01/1994 06/30/1995 General Ledger A Postings 6 Revenue Ledger 07/01/1994 06/30/1995 General Ledger & Postings ~ ,hred 1012 4012.8 .lournal Voucher O7/O1/1994 06/30/1995 06/30/2004 15-02-01 1 Alt. Folder # Alt, Folder Number Description Beginning Date Ending Date Record Title Name 1 ADJUSTING ENTR/ES AND APPROPRATION ENTP~ES 07/01/1994 06/30/1995 Journal Voucher 2 JULY 1994 07/01/1994 06/30/1995 .lournal Voucher 3 AUG 1994 07/01/1994 06/30/1995 3ournal Voucher 4 SEPT 1994 07/01/1994 06/30/1995 Joumal Voucher 5 OCT 1994 07/01/1994 06/30/1995 Journal Voucher 6 NOV 1994 07/01/1994 06/30/1995 Journal Voucher 7 DEC 1994 07/01/1994 06/30/1995 Journal Voucher 8 JAN 1995 07/01/1994 06/30/1995 3oumal Voucher 9 FEB 1995 07/01/1994 06/30/1995 3ournal Voucher ~ate Tam/~_~yne, Fin Officer Date Larry TeStiCle, ~A~..~vcs Dir ' Dat~ lin~Markman, City Attorney Page 13 Noti ication Number Destruction Notification Report 05/25/2004 ~ 10:15:02 159 City of Rancho Cucamonga (AC) ii Records Management Division (TMP) ~(~ FTNANCE (41S1) Bil to Name: (41SI) Re~ords Coordinator: LAYNE, TAMARA Mail Code: Phone: (909)477-2700 ext: 2430 Thee following records are due for destruction on 6/30/2004. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of E/~CH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide a memo justifying the hold. / THE SIGNED LTST TO THE RECORDS DIVISTON BY JUNE 15, 2004. Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy Code Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beg. Ending Hold? 06/30/2004 Location Space# 1612~'C6~'~.~012.8 .lournal Voucher 07/01/1994 06/30/1995 06/30/2004 15-02-01 1 Alt. Folder # Alt. Folder Number Description Beginning Date Ending Date Record Title Name 10 MAR 1995 07/01/1994 06/30/1995 3ournal Voucher 11 APRIL 1995 07/01/1994 06/30/1995 3ournal Voucher 12 MAY 1995 07/01/1994 06/30/1995 3ourllal Voucher 13 JUNE 1995 07/01/1994 06/30/1995 ]ourf~al Voucher hred 1976 4012.8 3ournal Voucher 07/01/1994 06/30/1995 06/30/2004 07-05-01 6 Box Contents: Ledgers, 3ournals Alt. Folder # Alt. Folder Number Description Beginning Date Ending Date Record Title Name 3 Cash Receivables 07/01/1994 06/30/1995 ]ournal Voucher hred 1978 4012.8 .lournal Voucher 07/01/1993 06/30/1995 06/30/2004 02-02-02 4 Box Contents: Journals Alt. Folder # Alt. Folder Number Description Beginning Date Ending D~te Record Title Name i Cash Receivables 07/01/1993 06/30/1994 ]ournal Voucher 2 Cash disbursements 07/01/1993 06/30/1994 Journal Voucher Shred 1979 4012.8 3ournal Voucher 07/01/1994 06/30/1995 06/30/2004 02-02-01 1 Box Contents: Journals, Ledgers 1994-95 Alt. Folder # Alt. Folder Number Description Beginning Date Ending Date Record Title Name 1 Appropriations 3ournal 07/01/1994 06/30/1995 3ournal Voucher 2 Cash Disbursements 07/01/1994 06/30/1995 Journal Voucher Date Fin Officer Date Larry Temple, Ad'~m~Svcs Oir Date 3ir~ Markman, City Attorney Page 14 Notification Number Destruction Notification Report 05/25/2004 lSS~ City of Rancho Cucamonga (RC) 10:15:02 ,I Records Management Division (TMP) FTNANCE (4151) Bil to Name: (4151) Re~ords Coordinator: LAYNE, TAMARA Mail Code: Phone: (909)477-2700 ext: 2430 Th~ following records are due for destruction on 6/30/2004. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide a memo justifying the hold. I REIURN THE SIGNED LI'ST TO THE RECORDS DIVTSION BY 3UNE 15, 2004. Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy (X)lCode Box N~mber.\Code (Box Contents) Beg. Ending Hold? 06/30/2004 Location Space# 1979 (.~C~012.8 .lournal Voucher 07/01/1994 06/30/1995 06/30/2004 02-02-01 1 Box Contents: Journals, Ledgers 1994-95 Alt. Folder # Alt. Folder Number Description Beginning Date Ending Date Record Title Name 4 Adjusting Journal 07/01/1994 06/30/1995 Journal Voucher Shred 2720 4040.5 Payroll Deductions &Authorization 01/01/1999 06/30/1999 06/30/2004 07-06-02 12 Box Contents: Payroll Deduction Regis (1/99 - 6/1999) Shred 2349 4040.9 Time Cards 03/14/1999 05/09/1999 05/09/2004 04-02-01 2 Box Contents: Time Cards (3/99 - 5/99) ;bred 2350 4040.9 Time Cards 01/03/1999 02/28/1999 02/28/2004 04-02-01 3 Box Contents: Time Cards (1/99 - 2/99) 2704 4041.2 Vacation & Sick Leave Reports 01/01/2000 06/30/2000 06/30/2004 15-02-01 3 Box Contents: Vac/Sick/Comp Report (1/2000 ~ 6/2000) A~t. Folder # Alt. Folder I~umber Description Beginning Oate Ending Date Record Title Name 1 1st and 2nd Quarters 01/01/2000 06/30/2000 Vacation & Sick Leave Reports Eligible Boxes on Hold = 1 Elgibile Boxes Checked Out = 0 Eigibiie Boxes Excepted = 0 Boxes to be Destroyed for this Department = 44 ( Excluding boxes on hold or boxes with folders on hold or checked out, and excluding boxes selected for exception ) Date Fin Officer Date Larry Templ~ AdheSives Dir Date ' 3im Markman, City Attorney Page 15 Notlification Number Destruction Notification Report 05/25/2004 161 City of Rancho Cucamonga (RC) 10:20:4~ Records Management Division (TMP) PLANNTNG DIVZS][ON (4333) Bil to Name= (4333) Re~ords Coordinator: SANCHEZ, GAZL Mail Code: Phone: (909)477-2700 ext: 4327 Th~ following records are due for destruction on 6/30/2004. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of · EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide a memo justifying the hold. IRE[tURN THE SI'GNED LIST TO THE RECORDS DZVI'SI'ON BY 3UNE 15, 2004. )estroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy (Xi :ode Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beg. Ending Hold? 06/30/2004 Location Space# ~can/Recyc 2584 8020.2 Conditional Use Permits (CUP's) 08/0~./~.990 06/30/2000 06/30/2004 03-02-03 6 Box Contents: CUP's (1996) Alt. Folder # Alt. Folder Number Description Beginning Date Ending Date Record Title Name 1 CUP 96-18 (Rainbow Praise Center) 08/01/1990 06/30/2000 Conditional Use Permits (CUP's) 2 CUP 96-19 (Traffic School) 08/01/1990 06/30/2000 Conditional Use Permits (CUP's) 3 CUP 96-21 (Texaco) 08/0~./~990 06/30/2000 Conditional Use Permits (CUP'S) 4 CUP 96-22 (Coye Dahlstrom) 08/01/~990 06/30/2000 Conditional Use Permits (CUP's) 5 CUP 96-23 (Golf Center) 08/01/~990 06/30/2000 Conditional Use Permits (CUP's) 6 CUP 96-24 (Mountain View Baptist) 08/01/1990 06/30/2000 Conditional Use Permits (CUP's) 7 CUP 96-25 (Technologies) 08/01/1990 06/30/2000 Conditional Use Permits (CUP's) 8 CUP 96-26 (Brooklyn Deli) 08/01/1990 06/30/2000 Conditional Use Permits (CUP's) 9 CUP 96-28 (Walker Sheet Metal) 08/01/1990 06/30/2000 Conditional Use Permits (CUP's) 10 CUP 96-29 (Door Components) 08/01/1990 06/30/2000 Conditional Use Permits (CUP's) 11 CUP 96-30 (Mortuary) 08/01/1990 06/30/2000 Conditional Use Permits (CUP's) 12 CUP 96-3! (Romanoskl) 08/0Z/1990 06/30/2000 Conditional Use Permits (CUP's) 13 CUP 96-32 (Auto Nation) 08/01/1990 06/30/2000 Conditional Use Permits (CUP'S) 14 CUP 96-32 - HOD (Auto Nation) 08/01/~990 06/30/2000 Conditional Use Permits (CUP's) 15 CUP 96-33 (Pat & Elaine Hein) 08/01/1990 06/30/2000 Conditional Use Permits (CUP's) 16 CUP 96-34 (True Authority Faith) 08/01/1990 06/30/2000 Conditional Use Permits (CUP's) 17 *** Needs to be Scanned *** 08/01/1990 06/30/2000 Conditional Use Permits (CUP's) ~can/Recyc 2590 8020.2 Conditional Use Permits (CUP's) 04/01/1987 04/30/2000 04/30/2004 06-03-02 B Box Contents; CUP's Alt. Folder # Alt, Folder Number Description Beginning Date Ending Date Record Title Name I'r _ II I Date / Brad Bu~y Pla~'"'' ' Dot~- Jim I~arkm~,~city Attorney Page Number Destruction Notification Report 05/25/2004 City of Rancho Cucamonga (RC) ~.0:20:43 Records Management Division (TMP) . C~ PLANNZNG DZVTSTON (4333) ~ ~ (4333) '., GAZL Mail Code: Phone: (g09)477-2700 ext: 4327 following records are due for destruction on 6/30/2004. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of Zf you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide a memo justifying the hold. SZGNED Lt'ST TO THE RECORDS DZVZSZON BY 3UNE 15, 2004. Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beg. Ending Hold? 06/30/2004 Location Space# 2590 8020.2 Conditional Use Permits (CUP's) 04/0~./1987 04/30/2000 04/30/2004 06-03-02 6 Contents: CUP'S Folder # Alt. Folder Number Description Beginning Date Ending Date Record Title Name ! CUP 96-35 (Lewis Devpt) 04/01/1987 04/30/2000 Condltlonal Use Permits (CUP's) 2 CUP 98-12 (Christian Faith Center) 04/01/1987 04/30/2000 Conditional Use Permits (CUP's) 3 CUP 97-i4 (Nextel) 04/01/I987 04/30/2000 Conditional Use Permits (CUP's) 4 CUP 97-22 (Arco) 04/0!/1987 04/30/2000 Conditional Use Permits (CUP's) 5 CUP 97-18 (Thomas Winery) 04/01/1987 04/30/2000 Conditional Use Permits (CUP's) 6 CUP 98-03 (Smith) 04/0!/!987 04/30/2000 Conditional Use Permits (CUP's) 7 CUP 97-16 (Spaghetti Factory) 04/01/1987 04/30/2000 Conditional Use Permits (CUP's) 8 CUP 97-2! (University of La Verne) 04/0i/i987 04/30/2000 Conditional Use Permits (CUP's) 9 CUP 97-15 (Deer Creek Car Wash) 04/0!/1987 04/30/2000 Conditional Use Permits (CUP's) I0 CUP 97-17 (Arco) 04/01/1987 04/30/2000 Conditional Use Permits (CUP's) ii CUP 97-13 (Wohl) 04/0i/i987 04/30/2000 Conditional Use Permits (CUP's) 12 CUP 87-17 (Barton) 04/01/1987 04/30/2000 Conditional Use Permits (CUP's) 13 CUP 87-17 (Barton) 04/01/1987 04/30/2000 Conditional Use Permits (CUP's) 14 *** Needs to be Scanned *** 04/01/1987 04/30/2000 Conditional Use Permits (CUP's) 2611 8020.2 Conditional Use Permits (CUP's) 06/O~./:l. gg7 04/30/2000 04/30/2004 O3-02-0~. 4 Contents: CUP 97-19 (Lucky's) Folder # Alt. Folder Number Description Beginning Date Ending Date Record Title Name I CUP 97-19 (Lucky's - Castillo Company) 06/01/1997 04/30/2000 Conditional Use Permits (CUP's) 2 CUP 97-19 (Lucky's/Savon) PJans (2 folders) 06/01/1997 04/30/2000 Conditional Use Permits (CUP's) 3 *** Needs to be Scanned *** 06/01/1997 04/30/2000 Conditional Use Permits (CUP's) :can/Recyc 2612 8020.2 Conditional Use Permits (CUP's) ~.0/0Z/~.997 0~./3~/2000 0:1./3:1./2004 06-02-02 Z Contents: CUP's (1997 & 1998) I II I Date....~rad B e~u~ ' y ~ -- Date ~lim Markman, City Attorney Page 2 NO :ification Number Destruction Notification Report 05/25/2004 :6~ City of Rancho Cucamonga (RC) 10:20:43 Records Management Division (TMP) ~ PLANNING DIVISION (4333) Bill ~o Name: (4333) Re~ :orals Coordinator: SANCHEZ, GAlL Mail Code: Phone: (909)477-2700 ext: 4327 ihE ~ following records are due for destruction on 6/30/2004. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of E.~ CH page. ]if you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide a memo justifying the hold. TURN THE SZGNED L]~ST TO THE RECORDS D/V]~SZON BY 3UNE 15, 2004. Destroy Permapent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy (X] Code Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beg. Ending Hold? 06/30/2004 Location Space# ~an/Recyc 2612 8020.2 Conditional Use Permits (CUP's) 10/01/1997 01/31/2000 01/31/2004 06-01-02 1 BOX Contents: CUP's (1997 & 1998) Alt. Folder # Alt. Polder Number Description Beginning Date Ending Date Record Title Name i CUP 97-38 (Desperado's) 10/01/1997 01/31/2000 Conditional Use Permits (CUP's) 2 CUP 98-22 (Sauter); CUP 98-23 (Vineyard Christian Fellowship); 10/01/1997 01/31/2000 Conditional Use Permits (CUP's) 3 CUP 98-25 (Chevron); CUP 98-26 (Mercedes 8enz); 10/01/1997 01/31/2000 Conditional Use Permits (CUP's) 4 CUP 98-27 (Vineyard Christian Church); CUP 98-28 (Prosser); 10/01/1997 01/31/2000 Conditional Use Permits (CUP's) 5 CUP 98-29 (Precision Gymnastics); CUP 98-30 (Northtown Housing): 10/01/1997 01/31/2000 Conditional Use Permits (CUP's) 6 CUP 98-31 (Arby's); CUP 98-32 (Cardlock Fuels Systems) 10/01/1997 01/31/2000 Conditional Use Permits (CUP's) 7 *** Needs to be Scanned *** 10/01/1997 01/31/2000 Conditional Use Permits (CUP's) Eligible Boxes on Hold = 0 Elgibile Boxes Checked Out = 0 Elgibile Boxes Excepted = 0 Boxes to be Destroyed for this Department = 4 ( Excluding boxes on hold or boxes with folders on hold or checked out, and excluding boxes selected for exception ) I II I I Page 3 Notification Number Destruction Notification Report 05/25/2004 16~ City of Rancho Cucamonga (RC) lO:2O:55 ! · Records Management Division (TMP) ~ COMMUNTTY SERV]:CES (4532) Bill to Name: (4532) RecOrds Coordinator: HORALES, MELzSSA Hail Code: Phone: (909)477-2760 ext: 2103 Th~ following/ records are due for destruction on 6/30/2004, Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EAfH page. ][f you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide a memo justifying the hold. / RE~'URN THE S]~GNED LIST TO THE RECORDS DI'VI'SZON BY 3UNE 15, 2004. / pestroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy (X)~ode Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beg. Ending Hold? 06/30/2004 Location Space# tred 2748 14010.2 Registration Forms & Receipts 12/17/2001 03/10/2002 03/10/2004 T1-01-01 7 Box Contents: CSD Receipts & Sr Ctr Deposits (1 of 5) Alt. Folder # Alt. Folder Number Description Beginning Date Ending Date Record Title Name 1 Winter 2002 receipts & deposit records from Senior Center 12/17/2001 03/10/2002 Registration Forms & Receipts 2749 14010.2 Registration Forms & Receipts 12/17/2001 03/11/2002 03/11/2004 T1-01-01 8 Box Contents: Winter 2002 deposits (Box 2 of 5) Alt. Folder # Alt. Folder Number Description Beginning Date Ending Date Record Title Name i Winter 2002 deposits (Lions East & West and CSD) 12/17/200! 03/ii/2002 Registration Forms E Receipts 2750 14010.2 Registration Forms & Receipts 12/17/2001 03/11/2002 03/11/2004 T1-01-01 g Box Contents: Winter 2002 Regist Forms (Box 3 of 5) 2751 14010.2 Registration Forms & Receipts 12/O1/2001 03/31/2002 O3/31/2OO4 T1-O1-O1 10 Box Contents: Winter 2002 Regist Forms (Box 4 of 5) Alt. Folder # Alt. Folder Number Description Beginning Date Ending Date Record Title Name i Winter 2002 program registrations (Lions East) 12/01/2001 03/31/2002 Registration Forms & Receipts ;hred 2752 14010.2 Registration Forms & Receipts 12/01/2001 03/31/2002 03/31/2004 T1-01-01 11 Box Contents: Winter 2002 Deposits (Box 5 of 5) Alt. FoJder # Alt. Folder Number Description Beginning Date Ending Date Record Title Name i Winter 2002 Program Reglst deposits (Lions East) 12/01/2001 03/31/2002 Registration Forms & Receipts 2753 14010.2 Registration Forms & Receipts 03/01/2002 06/30/2002 06/30/2004 T1-01-01 12 Box Contents: Spring 2002 Deposits (Box i of 5) Date Melissa Morales, Sr Adm Secty Date die, Comm Svcs Dir 'Dat,~ Jim M-arC'an, City Attorney Page I / ~lo~ification Number Destruction Notification Report 05/25/2004 t6~ City of Rancho Cucamonga (RC) 10:20:55 ! Records Management Division (TMP) ~ / COMMUNITY SERVTCES (4532) (~) 3illto Name: (4532) ~.e~ords Coordinator: MORALES, MELTSSA Mail Code: Phone: (g0g)477-2760 ext: 2103 Th~]following records are due for destruction on 6/30/2004. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional S months, provide a memo justifying the hold. / RETURN THE SI'GNED LTST TO THE RECORDS DTVI'SI'ON BY 1UNE 15, 2004. Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beg. Ending Hold? 06/30/2004 Location Space# 2753 14010.2 Registration Forms & Receipts 03/01/2002 06/30/2002 06/30/2004 T1-01-01 12 Box Contents: Spring 2002 Deposits (Box ! of 5) Alt. Folder # Alt. Folder Number Description Beginning Date Ending Date Record Title Name i Spring 2002 deposit records (Lions East) 03/01/2002 06/30/2002 Registration Forms & Receipts ~hred 2754 14010.2 Registration Forms & Receipts 03/01/2002 06/30/2002 06/30/2004 T1-01-01 13 Box Contents: Spring 2002 Regist forms (Box 2 of 5) Alt. Folder # Alt. Folder Number Description Beginning Date Ending Date Record Title Name 1 Spring 2002 registration forms (Lions East) 03/01/2002 06/30/2002 Registration Forms & Receipts 3hred 2755 14010.2 Registration Forms & Receipts 03/01/2002 06/30/2002 06/30/2004 T1-01-01 14 Box Contents: Spring 2002 deposits (Box 3 of 5) Alt. Folder # Alt. Folder Number Description Beginning Date Ending Date Record Title Name 1 Spring 2002 deposits (CSD & Lions East) 03/01/2002 06/30/2002 Registration Forms & Receipts ;hred 2756 14010.2 Registration Forms & Receipts 03/01/2002 06/30/2002 06/30/2004 T1-01-01 15 Box Contents: Spring 2002 Deposits (BOX 4 of 5) Alt. Folder # Alt. Folder Number Description Beginning Date Ending Date Record Title Name i Spring 2002 deposits (Sr. Ctr., CSD, Lions East) 03/01/2002 06/30/2002 Registration Forms & Receipts ~hred 2757 14010.2 Registration Forms & Receipts 03/01/2002 06/30/2002 06/30/2004 T1-01-01 16 Box Contents: Spring 2002 Regist forms (Box $ of 5) Date Mel~ssa Morales, Sr Adm Secty Date Kevin McAfdle, Comm Svcs Dir Date / 3im I~rkman, City Attorney Page 2 Notification Number Destruction Notification Report 05/25/2004 t6~ City of Rancho Cucamonga (RC) 10:20:55 ! Records Management Division (TMP) ~ COMMUNITY SERVICES (4532) ailllto Name: (4532) [~ecorcls Coordinator: MORALES, MEL1.SSA Mail Code: Phone. (909)477-2760 ext: 21.03 / Th~ following records are due for destruction on 6/30/2004. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. 1.f you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide a memo justifying the hold. / RE~'URN THE St'GNED LI'ST TO THE RECORDS D1.V1.St'ON BY 3UNE t5f 2004. Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beg. Ending Hold? 06/30/2004 Location Space# 2757 1401.0.2 Registration Forms & Receipts 03/01./2002 06/30/2002 06/30/2004 T1.-0].-01. 1.6 Box Contents: Spring 2002 Regist forms (BOX 5 of 5) ;hred 2763 14010.2 Registration Forms & Receipts 12/01/2001 03/31/2002 03/31/2004 T1-01-0t 22 Box Contents: Winter 2002 Playschool Alt. Folder # Alt. Folder Number Description Beginning Date Ending Date Record Title Name ! Winter 2002 Playschool registration forms & deposit records 12/01/200! 03/31/2002 Registration Forms & Receipts Eligible Boxes on Hold = 0 Elgiblle Boxes Checked Out = 0 Elgibile Boxes Excepted = 0 Boxes to be Destroyed for this Department = 11. ( Excluding boxes on hold or boxes with folders on hold or checked out, and excluding boxes selected for exception ) Date Melissa Morales~ Sr Adm Secty Date Kevin t4cA~le, Comm Svcs Dir Date ' .lim'~arkman, City Attorney Page 3 NoUfication' Number Destruction Notification Report 05/25/2004 '16i City of Rancho Cucamonga (RC) 10:28:26 ! Records Management Division (TMP) --~ .J ENGTNEERI'NG/ADMI'N (4637) ~ Billto Name: (4637) Rewords Coordinator: Diane Whyte Mail Code: Phone: (909)477-2700 ext: 4013 Tl~e'k following records are due for destruction on 6/30/2004. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of E/~CN page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide a memo justifying the hold. / I R1TURN THE SI~GNED LZST TO THE RECORDS DI'VZS[ON BY 3UNE 15, 2004. /Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beg. Ending Hold? 06/30/2004 Location Space# Scan/Recyc 2586 8020.2 Conditional Use Permits (CUP's) 01/01/1989 06/30/2000 06/30/2004 06-02-01, 2 1 CUP's: 87-19, 88-18, 90-16, 91-09, 01/01/1989 06/30/2000 Conditional Use Permits (CUP's) 2 CUP's: 93~04, 93-08, 93-20, 93-21, 93-49, 01/01/1989 06/30/2000 Conditional Use Permits (CUP's) 3 CUP's: 94-13, 94-16, 94-39, 95-11, 95-40, 95-37 01/01/1989 06/30/2000 Conditional Use Permits (CUP's) 4 CUP'S: 96-16, 96-21, 96-26, 96-27, 96-33, 01/01/1989 06/30/2000 Conditional Use Permits (CUP's) 5 CUP'S: 97-02, 97-03, 97-05, 97-15, 97-32, 97-45, 97-47 01/01/1989 06/30/2000 Conditional Use Permits (CUP's) 6 CUP'S: 98-17, 98-24, 98-26, 98-30, 98-32, 99-09, 99-47 01/01/1989 06/30/2000 Conditional Use Permits (CUP's) Excluded Eligible Boxes on Hold = 0 Elgibile Boxes Checked Out = 0 Elgibile Boxes Excepted = 0 Boxes to be Destroyed for this Department = 1 ( Excluding boxes on hold or boxes with folders on hold or checked outt and excluding boxes selected for exception ) ./ Date ell, City Engineer Date / .lim Mark~an, ~i1~y~Attorney Page R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A E~,'GIN E ERIN G DE PAR T~ E NT SlaffReport DATE: August 4, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer ~ BY: Jerry A. Dyer, Senior Civil Enginees,~J SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A GRANT OF ~ASEMENT TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY FOR THE UNDERGROUND WORK ALONG EAST AVENUE FROM NORTH OF BANYAN STREET TO NORTH OF 23RD STREET FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF FIRE STATION NO. 176 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution authorizing the City Engineer to sign the Grant of Easement to Southern California Edison Company for the underground work along East Avenue from north of Banyan Street to north of 23rd Street for the construction of Fire Station No. 176. BACKGROUND/ANALYSI~ When East Avenue was widened for Fire Station No. 176 electrical underground substructure facilities were placed along the east side across the park frontage. This section of East Avenue was never dedicated as street right-of-way with the park construction since the City owned the property. Hence, Edison has requested the City grant an easement for the underground. A copy of the Grant of Easement is available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully submitted,. WI 'II'am J. O Neil City Engineer WJO:JAD Attachments: Vicinity Map/Resolution ~OJ~GT ~ LOCATION ~~ CI~ OF ~CHO CUC~ONGA ~ Av~ NO~ OF ~ VICINITY M~ RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE GRANT OF EASEMENT TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has for its consideration a Grant of Easement to Southern California Edison Company for the utility underground work along East Avenue from north of Banyan Street to north of 23rd Street for the construction of Fire Station No. 176. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, hereby resolves that said Grant of Easement be hereby approved and the City Engineer is hereby authorized to sign the Grant of Easement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. T H CITY OF Sb fff Report DATE: August 4, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Betty Miller, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT, SRA-35, FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION AT CARNELIAN AND VlVERO STREETS, IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF TRACT 15783, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF CARNELIAN STREET AT VlVERO STREET, SUBMITTED BY G & D CONSTRUCTION, INC., TO BE FUNDED FROM TRANSPORTATION REIMBURSEMENT ACCOUNT NUMBER 11243035650/1026124-0 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the amendment to the Reimbursement Agreement for the installation of a traffic signal at Carnelian and Vivero Streets, in conjunction with the development of Tract 15783, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: As a Condition of Approval of Tentative Tract 15783, G & D Construction, the Developer, was required to install a traffic signal at Carnelian and Vivero Streets. After the signal was installed, the Developer installed additional sidewalk improvements that required adjustments to the traffic signal. The signal was retrofitted with pedestrian crossing facilities on the west side of Carnelian Street. The additional improvements have been completed by the Developer. Whenever a developer is required, as a condition of approval of a development permit, to construct a public facility that is determined by the City to have supplemental size, length or capacity over what is needed for the impacts of that development, and when such construction is necessary to ensure efficient and timely construction of the facilities network, a reimbursement agreement with the developer and a credit against the Transportation Development Fee shall be offered. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT SRA-35 - G & D CONSTRUCTION August 4, 2004 Page 2 The Developer has submitted an itemized accounting of the construction costs of the required signal modification. Staff has reviewed and concurs with the submittal. The total cost of said improvements is $7,026.75, to be reimbursed from the City Transportation Reimbursement Account Number 11243035650/1026124-0. Copies of the agreement signed by the Developer are available in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitte.d, V~illit{m J. O'Ueil City Engineer WJO:BM:tch Vivero Street 210 ~ ~ ~ Baseline ~1~~i''er° Footh~U CITY OF ITEM: R~ANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: Vicinity Map ENGiNEERING DIVISION EXHIBIT: Tract 15783 RESOLUTION NO. 0~-~_ c:~ ~)~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION AT THE INTERSECTION OF CARNELIAN AND VIVERO STREETS, SRA-35 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has for its consideration an amendment to a Reimbursement Agreement submitted by G & D Construction, Inc., the Developer, for off-site improvements, in conjunction with the development of Tract 15783, located on the west side of Carnelian Street at Vivero Street; and WHEREAS, the Developer, at Developer's expense, has completed the required improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY 'COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, HEREBY RESOLVES that said Reimbursement Agreement be and the same is hereby approved and the Mayor is herby authorized to sign said Reimbursement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the City Clerk to attest thereto. R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ~NGIN EE ~1 N G D EPAI~TH ENT Staff Report DATE: July 20, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Mark Brawthen, Contract Engineer SUBJECT APPROVAL OF A MAP AND A DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2002- 00292 FOR PARCEL MAP 16044, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF WHITE OAK AVENUE AND ARROW ROUTE, SUBMITTED BY CAPELLINO AND ASSOCIATES RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Parcel Map 16044 and authorize the City Engineer to cause said map to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tentative Parcel Map 16044, located on the southeast corner of White Oak Avenue and Arrow Route in the General Industrial District (Subarea 8), was approved by the Planning Commission on January 8, 2003 for the division of 3.66 acres into 5 parcels. Parcel Map 16044 is a subdivision of a portion of previously approved Parcel Map 12959-1 (Parcels 1 and 2). The City Council approved Parcel Map 12959-1 on October 7, 1991 along with an improvement agreement and securities (Resolution No. 92-263). At time of approval Parcel Map 12959-1 was also annexed into the appropriate landscape and lighting maintenance districts (Resolution No. 92-264). All Public Improvements were installed with Parcel Map 12959-1. The estimated cost of the required revision to the existing improvements resulting from the Parcel Map 16044 is less than Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00), and does not require an agreement or security. Said improvements will be noted on the building permit hard card for DRC2002'-00292 an~ shall be constructed and accepted by the City prior to occupancy. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2002-00292 - CAPELLINO AND ASSOCIATES August 4, 2004 Page 2 Respectfully submitted, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ENGINEERING DIVISION WirtiaCn J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:MB:tch Attachments Vicinity Map City of Rancho Cucamonga Parcel Map 16044 5 parcels Exhibit "A" City of Item: Staff Report Rancho Cucamonga Title: Parcel Map 16044 ENGINEERING EXHIBIT B: 5 Parcels DIVISION A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP 16044 WHEREAS, Tentative Pamel Map No. 16044, submitted by Capellino and Associates, and consisting of 5 parcels, located on the southeast corner of Arrow Route and White Oak Avenue being a division of Parcels 1 and 2 of Parcel Map 12959-1, was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on January 8, 2003, and is in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and Local Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that Act; and WHEREAS, Parcel Map No. 16044 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and WHEREAS, said Developer submits for approval said Parcel Map offering for dedication, the rights of Flood Inundation over areas shown on the annexed map theron for storm drain, purposes. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that said easements and the final map delineating the same for Parcel Map No. 16044 is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. R A N C h O C U C A M O N G a COMFIUNITY ~E I~VICE& DATE: August 4, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director BY: Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF A PROPOSAL FOR COISPONSORSHIP AND WAIVER OF VARIOUS FEES AND CHARGES FOR THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE'S CARNIVAL AND GRAPE HARVEST FESTIVAL SCHEDULED FOR OCTOBER 1-3, 2004 AT THE EPICENTER SPECIAL EVENT AREA. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council consider the attached request from the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce for co-sponsorship of their Carnival and Grape Harvest Festival that is scheduled for October 1-3, 2004, (move-in/out dates extend the Chamber's request to include September 28~h, 29th and 30th and October 4th) at the Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter Special Event Area and waive the base rent, the move in/out rental fee, basic maintenance expenses and any City related permits required for the event and to allow for the sale and consumption of alcohol within restricted locations on the site. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce has hosted a wine and grape festival for the community for a number of years. Four years ago the Chamber scaled back the event to make the festival more manageable to staff with their volunteer core, moved the dates of the festival back to the traditional dates of early October and moved the event to bring it back to Rancho Cucamonga at the Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter Special Event Area. This year the Chamber will once again include a Carnival as a part of the Festival that would include 6-8 adult rides and 6-8 children's rides. This additional feature necessitates a 5-day move- in/move-out timeframe for the Festival. The exact hours of the Carnival are not set at this time, however, the Festival will be open to the public from 6:00 p.m. until midnight on Friday, October 1st, 12-noon until midnight on Saturday, October 2n~ and 11:00 a.m. until 6:00 p.m. on Sunday, October 3rd. Other activities planned for the Festival include business vendor booths, arts and crafts, community stage featuring local entertainment, food and beverage vendors and a wine/beer pavilion at the Epicenter Special Event Area. Parking Lots A, B, C, D and E at the Epicenter will be used for parking for the Festival (A number of parking spots in Lot E will be reserved for Animal Shelter CITY COUNCIL Co-SPONSORSHIP OF GRAPE HARVEST FESTIVAL AUGUST 4, 2004 parking for the weekend). All adult softball, soccer and Little League activities will be cancelled for the weekend to ensure adequate parking for the Carnival and Grape Harvest Festival. Based upon requirements of the event, conditions of use for the site and cost estimates associated with the use of the Epicenter have been developed by staff. Traditional rental fees for such an event would include a base rent for the Epicenter Special Event Area and parking lots A, B, C and D, and E, move in/out rent for the Epicenter Special Event Area, maintenance services and police security. Estimates of these fees are detailed below: · Base Rent - Event Dates (Special Event Area, Parking lots A, B, C D & E) $12,000 · Move in/out Rental (Special Event Area) $ 5,000 · Maintenance (includes additional suppod for refuse pick-up service as requested by the Chamber) $ 5,099 · Police Security (event days/timeframe$ only) $ 5.666 Total $ 27,765 In accordance with Epicenter policy, in addition to the fees noted above the following charges would also be required from the Chamber: 10% admissions fee based upon gross revenue from the Festival ticket sales and 10% of gross revenue on Chamber sold food, beverage and merchandise sales. These fees and an accounting of their sales are due to the City within 5-working days of the event. As in the past, staff recommends that the Council waive the percentage payment from outside food/beverage vendors due to the difficulty for the Chamber to collect these fees. Staff has recently received a request from the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce for co- sponsorship and waiver of all fees, except for the admissions tax, for the upcoming Festival. However, to be consistent with previous years' support by the Council and with other co- sponsorship requests that the City Council has approved in the past, it is staff's recommendation that the City Council waive the base rent fee ($12,000), the move in/out rental fee ($5,000) and the basic maintenance costs ($277) associated with the Chamber's use of the Epicenter for their 2004 Carnival and Grape Harvest Festival. Basic maintenance services include: minimal site supervision, a once daily refuse pick-up service and street sweeping at the conclusion of the event. Staff would also request that the City Council approve the waiver of fees for any building/fire inspections and permits. At this time the fiscal impact of this portion of the request is not known. Due to the addition of the Carnival and consistent with other co-sponsored events of this nature, the Chamber of Commeme and the Chamber's Carnival vendor, L.O. Productions, would be required to provide $2 million dollar comprehensive public liability coverage, $1 million dollar automobile coverage and $1 million coverage for Worker's Compensation. Insurance documents should also include an endorsement naming the City of Rancho Cucamonga as additionally insured for the full time frame of the event including move-in and move-out dates. A refundable damage/security/performance deposit in the amount of $2,500 would also be required from the Chamber. Payment of fees and approval of insurance documents are traditionally required prior to the start of the event. Staff does not recommend waiver of the direct service fees for police security and the enhanced maintenance services, the percentage Festival admissions and the percentage on Chamber sold food, beverage and merchandise nor the damage/security deposit as doing so would not be consistent with other City Council co-sponsored activities that have taken place at the Epicenter. In addition, the Chamber has agreed to the payment of the Admissions Tax for gate admission. -2- CITY COUNCIL Co-SPONSORSHIP OF GRAPE HARVEST FESTIVAL AUGUST 4, 2004 Lastly, staff also recommends that City Council approve the sale and consumption of beer and wine for the Festival within restricted locations at the Epicenter Special Event Area (Expanded Parking Lot), as outlined in Ordinance Number 634. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of ce-sponsorship and waiver of fees as recommended by staff would result in a waiver of $17,277 in fees that would be offset, in part, by the admissions percentage and Chamber concessions/merchandise revenues received from the event. Community Services Director Attachment ~c~MMSERwc~unci~&B~ards~cityc~unci~Sta~Rep~rts~3~GrapeHa~vestFestiva~c~Sp~ns~rship8~4~4~dcc -3- TH E C I T Y OF I~AN C H 0 CU CAH 0 N C.A StaffRepor DATE: August 4, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, AICP, Senior Planner Eric Elder, Planning Aide SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF A PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY DRC2004-00617 - CHEVRON - A request to issue a Public Convenience and Necessity for a Type 21 off-sale liquor license for a Chevron gas station in the Community Commercial District, located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, west of Vineyard Avenue at 8801 Foothill Boulevard - APN: 0207-211-12 thru 15, 38, and 40. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the determination of Public Convenience and Necessity for a Chevron Service Station through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval, and forward a copy to the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC). ANALYSIS: A. Backqround: The Chevron Service Station is located west of Vineyard Avenue and south of Foothill Boulevard, as shown on the attached Site Plan (Exhibit "B"). The Chevron Service Station has a convenience market, drive-thru carwash and pump island. The convenience market sells beer, wine, gourmet foods, magazines, and related items. They do not sell videos and do not have coin-operated amusement devices. They operate Monday through Sunday, 24 hours a day. B. Requirements from Department of Alcohol Beveraqe Control: The Department of Alcohol Beverage Control (ABC) regulates the distribution of liquor licenses by setting limits on the various types of licenses in each census tract. The limits are calculated based on the ratio of liquor licenses to population of the census tract. According to ABC staff, the off-sale and on-sale licenses in this census tract are over limit, and a finding of Public Convenience or Necessity is required. Additionally, ABC staff stated that a finding of Public Convenience and Necessity (PCN) is required by the local agency (as governed by Section 23958 of the Business and Professional Code), because of a moratorium on CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CHEVRON SERVICE STATION - DRC2004-00617 August 4, 2004 Page 2 new ABC licenses within San Bernardino County. The legislation purposely left the term Public Convenience and Necessity undefined, so that the local legislative body, in this case the City Council, would have the greatest latitude for discretion based on the local conditions and circumstances. C. Facts To Support A Public Convenience And Necessity Determination: Tl~e following are facts to support the requested Public Convenience and Necessity. Fact: A retailer of beer, wine, gourmet foods, and other related items is a common and accepted business. Fact: The site is located west of Vineyard Avenue and south of Foothill Boulevard, which are designated as major thoroughfares, and the site is suited for this type of business. Fact: The site is not close to sensitive users, such as day care facilities, schools, and/or churches. Fact: On April 2, 2003, the City Planner approved Conditional Use Permit DRCCUP00-17, to establish the business at the site. Fact: Rancho Cucamonga residents would be afforded more shopping opportunities for personal and convenience items and services. CONCLUSION: Based on the above analysis, staff finds that the oft-sale (Type 21) license at the site will not have a negative impact to the surrounding uses. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:NF/ge Attachments: Exhibit"A" - Census Tract Map Exhibit"B" - Site Plan Resolution of Approval for Public Convenience and Necessity DRC2004-00617 8.07 19TH 8.1 FOOTHILL ! ' ARROW A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO cUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A DETERMINATION OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY DRC2004-00617 FOR A CONVENIENCE MARKET (CHEVRON SERVICE STATION) OF BEER, WINE, GOURMET FOOD, AND'RELATED ITEMS, LOCATED WEST OF VINEYARD AVENUE AND SOUTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0207-211-12, THRU 15, 38, AND 40. A. Recitals. 1. Chevron Products Company filed an application for Public Convenience and Necessity DRC2004-00617, as described in the title of this Resolution, for a Type 21 (off-sale) license from the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC). 2. Section 23958 of the Business and Professional Code requires the City of Rancho Cucamonga to make a determination that the issuance of the said license will service the public convenience or necessity. 3. On the 4th day of August 2004, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga reviewed said application prior to the adoption of this Resolution. 4. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced meeting on August 4, 2004, including written and oral staff reports, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. A convenience store selling beer, wine, gourmet foods, and other related items is a common and accepted business; and b. The site is located west of Vineyard Avenue and south of Foothill Boulevard, which are designated as major thoroughfares, and the site is suited for this type of business; and c. The site is not close to sensitive users, such as day care facilities, schools, and/or churches; and d. On April 2, 2003, Conditional Use Permit DRCCU P00-17 was issued to a Chevron Service Station to establish the business at the site; and e. Rancho Cucamonga residents would be afforded more shopping opportunities for personal and convenience items and services. CiTY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 04- CHEVRON SERVICE STATION - DRC2004-00617 August 4, 2004 Page 2 3. Based upon the findings set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council concludes that the issuance of an off-sale liquor license for Chevron Service Station will not have a negative impact to the surrounding uses. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, and 3 above, this Council hereby determines that the issuance of an off-sale liquor license for Chevron Service Station will service the Public Convenience and Necessity. '/ 5. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. H CiTY 0 F I~AN CliO CUCAHONGA S fff Rel:x}rt DATE: August 4, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director BY: Karen McGuire-Emery, Senior Park Planner SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO AWARD THE STRUCTURAL STEEL AND MISCELLANEOUS METALS AND METAL DECKING CONTRACT TO W&W STEEL, FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CULTURAL CENTER PROJECT, TOTALING $6,700,000 AND AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF A 10% CONTINGENCY, OF $670,000, FOR A TOTAL OF $7,370,000 TO BE FUNDED FROM 2001 TAX ALLOCATION BONDS TO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ACCOUNT NO. 2650801- 5650/1357650-6314, STATE LIBRARY GRANT FUNDS ACCOUNT NO. 1310602-5650/1357310-6314, AND AUTHORIZE THE APPROPRIATION OF $5,323,150 INTO ACCOUNT NO. 2650801- 5650/1357650-6314, AND THE APPROPRIATION OF $2,046,850 INTO ACCOUNT NO. 1310602-5650/1357310-6314. ALSO, APPROVAL OF THE PLAN CHECK/PERMIT FEES ASSOCIATED WITH THE VICTORIA GARDENS CULTURAL CENTER PROJECT; AND APPROVAL OF A BUDGET APPROPRIATION OF $185,000 INTO ACCOUNT NUMBER 2650801-5650/1357650-6320. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council accept the bid received and award and authorize the execution of the steel contract totaling $6,700,000, to W & W Steel, for the construction of the Rancho Cucamonga Cultural Center Project to be funded from the accounts listed above, and authorize the appropriation of $5,323,150 into Account No. 2650801-5650/1357650-6314. Funding from the State Library Grant Funds Account No. 1310602-5650/1357310-6314 is included in the adopted FY 2004/05 Budget. These appropriations include the 10% contingency. In addition, it is recommended that the Redevelopment Agency Board approve the Plan //3 Page 2 August 4, 2004 APPROVAL TO AWARD THE STRUCTURAL STEEL AND MISCELLANEOUS METALS AND METAL DECKING CONTRACT TO W & W STEEL, FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CULTURAL CENTER PROJECT, TOTALING $6,700,000 AND AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF A 10% CONTINGENCY, OF $670,000, FOR A TOTAL OF $7,370,080 TO BE FUNDED FROM 2001 TAX ALLOCATION BONDS TO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ACCOUNT NO. 2650801-5650/1357650-6314, STATE LIBRARY GRANT FUNDS ACCOUNT NO. 1310602- 5650/1357310-6314, AND AUTHORIZE THE APPROPRIATION OF $5,323,150 INTO ACCOUNT NO. 2650801-5650/1357310-6314, AND THE APPROPRIATION OF $2,046,650 INTO ACCOUNT NO. 1310602-5650/1357310-6314. ALSO, APPROVAL OF THE PLAN CHECK/PERMIT FEES ASSOCIATED WITH THE VICTORIA GARDENS CULTURAL CENTER PROJECT; AND APPROVAL OF A BUDGET APPROPRIATION OF $185,000 INTO ACCOUNT NUMBER 2650801- 5650/1357650.-6320. Check/Permit Fees associated with the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center Project in the amount of $185,000 and approve a budget appropriation of $185,000 into Account Number 2650801-5650/13576,50-6320. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The Rancho Cucamonga Cultural Center Project is a multi-prime contract, and C.W. Driver was selected, under separate Council action, to serve as the Construction Management Firm. Construction documents for the Rancho Cucamonga Cultural Center Project were broken down by trade into 26 separate bid packages. (see attached Bid Package Table - Priority I and 2) On June 2, 2004, the City solicited bids for 15 of the 26 contracts. Bids for these 15 bid packages were received and opened on Tuesday, July 27, 2004. The total of the Iow bids received for the 15 bid packages was 6% over the Construction Manager's cost estimate of $27,178,390. Upon investigation, staff and the Construction Manager determined that this increased cost was due to the continuing increase in costs for steel, metal and concrete materials. The remaining 11 bid packages (see attached Bid Package Table - Priority 3) are currently being reviewed for value engineering cost savings and will be advertised and awarded at a later date. Staff is in the process of reviewing all the bid packages received to ensure that the 14 currently remaining are in compliance with the bid requirements, and anticipates award of these bid packages at the regularly scheduled August 18, City Council meeting. However, due to the escalating steel costs, staff reviewed the steel bid package first, and is proceeding with the award of that bid package as quickly as possible so the contractor can place his material order and guarantee the price of materials. Two bids were received for bid package 5-1 Structural Steel, Miscellaneous Metals and Metal Decking. Although the apparent Iow bidder for the steel bid package was Lynx Iron Corporation in the amount of $6,491,800, they did not attend any one of the advertised, mandatory pre-bid meetings, which were held on 5 separate days at various locations throughout the region. For this reason, they are considered non- responsive in this bid. The second Iow bidder for the steel bid package was W & W Steel, providing a bid in the amount of $6,700,000. Staff has reviewed their bid and has found it to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements. Page 3 August 4, 2004 APPROVAL TO AWARD THE STRUCTURAL STEEL AND MISCELLANEOUS METALS AND METAL DECKING CONTRACT TO W & W STEEL, FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CULTURAL CENTER PROJECT, TOTALING $6,700,000 AND AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF A 10% CONTINGENCY, OF $670,000, FOR A TOTAL OF $7,370,000 TO BE FUNDED FROM 2001 TAX ALLOCATION BONDS TO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ACCOUNT NO. 2650801-5650/1357650-6314, STATE LIBRARY GRANT FUNDS ACCOUNT NO. 1310602- 5650/1357310-6314, AND AUTHORIZE THE APPROPRIATION OF $5,323,150 INTO ACCOUNT NO. 2650801-5650/1357310-6314, AND THE APPROPRIATION OF $2,046,850 INTO ACCOUNT NO. 1310602-5650/1357310-6314. ALSO, APPROVAL OF THE PLAN CHECKJPERMIT FEES ASSOCIATED WITH THE VICTORIA GARDENS CULTURAL CENTER PROJECT; AND APPROVAL OF A BUDGET APPROPRIATION OF $185,000 INTO ACCOUNT NUMBER 2650801- 5650/1357650-6320. Funds for construction of the project are from a variety of sources including a state library grant of almost $7.8 Million, financial participation by the mall developer, Forest City, and RDA funds generated through the sale of Tax Allocation bonds, as well as City and County Community Development Block Grant Funds. No City General Funds will be used for construction of the Cultural Center. It is anticipated that construction will be completed in the spring/summer of 2006. Now that the City has completed the plans for the Cultural Center project and has obtained final approval with the City's Building & Safety Department fees for the plan check and permitting process are due. Permits will also be required for the actual construction of the Cultural Center project. The Plan Check/Permit Fees are required to be paid to the City by the Redevelopment Agency and this Staff Report approves and appropriates those monies necessary to complete these requirements. Also, while CVWD and school districts do not collect fees for City owned projects, the Inland Empire Utilities Agency is required to collect fees for sewer/capital capacity and treatment. Included in the appropriation is the estimated capital capacity fee that is paid by the Agency to the Inland Empire Utilities Agency. Community Services Director Attachment RANCHO CUCAMONGA CULTURAL CENTER June 1, 2004 BID PACKAGE PRIORITY GROUPS Bid Pkg IDescription SUBTOTAL - PRIORITY 1 03-1 Concrete, Concrete Reinforcement, Earthwork 05-1 Structural Steel, Misc. Metals and Metal Decking 09-1 Metal Stud Framing, DrTwall, Plaster, Acoustical Insulation and Sealants, Fireproofing, Firestopping and Doors/Frames/Hardware 14-1 Elevators 15-1 Fire Protection Systems 15-2 Plumbing & Site Utilities 15-3 Heating, Ventilating and Air Conditioning 16-1 Electrical SUBTOTAL - PRIORITY 2 01-1 Manlift / Matedal Hoist .. 04-1 Precast Concrete and Unit Masonry 06-1 Finish Carpentry and Architectural Woodwork 07-1 Built-up Roofing and Waterproofing 07-2 Sheet Metal Roofing / Underlayment Insulation, Flashing, Sheet Metal, Metal Panels and Roof Hatches 08-2 Glass and Glazing 09-3 Ceramic Tile SUBTOTAL - PRIORITY 3 01-2 Final Clean-up 02-1 Landscaping, Irriagation Systems and Site Furnishings 02-2 Site Concrete 02-3 Bituminous Concrete Paving, Pavement Markings 09-2 Tackable Wallboard Systems, Acoustical Treatments and Acoustical Ceiling Systems 09-4 Resilient Floodng and Carpeting 09-5 Painting and Wall Coverings 10-1 Fire Extinguishers Cabinets, ToilefJBath Accessories, Metal Lockers, Markerboards/Tackboards, Miscellaneous Specialties, Coiling Door Systems, Window Coverings and Operable Partitions and Hydraulic Lifts 11-1 Theater Rigging Systems and Theatrical Draperies 11-2 Food Service Equipment 12-1 Theater Seating ~ A N C H O C U C A M O N G A E N G I NE E R I N G D E P A R T M E N T DATE: August 4, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Rene Guerrero, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF AN ACQUISITION AGREEMENT FOR THE CITY TO ACQUIRE OFF-SITE PROPERTY, SECURITY AND DEPOSITS FOR TRACT MAP 16454, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND ETIWANDA AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY KB HOME GREATER LOS ANGELES, INC. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution approving an Acquisition Agreement, Security and Deposit, and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The Developer is constructing two separate projects, Tracts 16454 and 16455, along Base Line Road, east of Etiwanda Avenue. Both projects will take access from Base Line Road via Emmett Way and Shelby Place. A Not-A-Part parcel that separates said streets has frontage along Base Line Road and the Developer has proposed to construct street improvements along said pamel's frontage to complete Base Line Road between their two projects. Consistent with the Developer's proposal, a condition of approval to construct said off-site improvements was placed on the tentative map. During plan check of the final map, the Developer made a good faith effort to acquire the off-site property, but has been unable to do so to date. Since a condition of approval requires construction of off-site improvements on property owned by neither the Developer nor the City, the Developer has executed an Acquisition Agreement to allow approval of their final map, also on tonight's agenda. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TRACT 16454 - KB HOME GREATER LOS ANGELES, INC. August 4, 2004 Page 2 The City is authorized by state law to acquire by eminent domain that property necessary for installation or construction of improvements on off-site property. The Developer has signed the agreement and submitted the appropriate deposit and security for the acquisition. This agreement allocates costs and responsibilities towards obtaining said properties. The agreement has been reviewed and approved by the City Attorney and is available in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted, City Engineer WJO:RG:tch Attachments V/¢INITY NOT TO SCALE CITY OF ITEM: 73z-AcT RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: ENG~EE~G DIVISION E~IBIT: RESOLUTION O$.~..- ~5~' A RESOLUT, ON OF THE C,TY COU.C,L OF THE C,TY OF RA. CHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN ACQUISITION AGREEMENT OF OFF-SITE PROPERTY, SECURITY AND DEPOSIT FOR TRACT MAP 16454, FROM KB HOME GREATER LOS ANGELES, INC., AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME WHEREAS, the Developer, KB Home Greater Los Angeles, Inc., has submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga tract and improvement plans for review as conditioned by Planning Commission Resolution No. 03-118, located at the southeast corner of Base Line Road and Etiwanda Avenue; and WHEREAS, for the Developer to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to recording the final map of said development, said Developer has offered the Acquisition Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution by said City, together with good and sufficient security and deposit. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: 1. That said Acquisition Agreement be and the same is hereby approved, and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Agreement on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and 2. That said Acquisition Agreement is accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney. R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTME~f SbffR port DATE: August 4, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: rJ William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Jerry A. Dyer, Senior Civil Enginee SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A PROFESSIOI~AL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH SB&O, INC., IN THE AMOUNT OF $37,000 AND AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF A 10% CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,700 TO PROVIDE FISCAL YEAR 2004/2005 TOPOGRAPHICAL DESIGN SURVEY SERVICES FOR PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS WITHIN THE CITY, TO BE FUNDED FROM MEASURE I, DRAINAGE, BEAUTIFICATION AND TRANSPORTATION FUNDS RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the Professional Services Agreement with SB&O, Inc., to provide fiscal year 2004/2005 topographical design survey services, for proposed capital improvement projects at various locations within the City, and authorize the Mayor to sign said agreement and the City Clerk to attest thereto. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Requests for proposals were advertised to provide design survey services for proposed capital improvement projects at various locations within the City. Six firms responded, and after review and rating of the proposals, the proposal submitted from SB&O, Inc., CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Professional Services Agreement with SB&O August 4, 2004 Page 2 was accepted as meeting the best needs of the City based on their qualifications, experience, and lowest overall cost. Respectfully submitted, City Engineer W JO:JAP Attachments N AVE ~T~ ~T NTS ONTARIO CITY LIMIT LEGEND TH E CITY OF I~AN C H 0 C U CAM 0 N GA Staff Report DATE: August 4, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Duane A. Baker, Assistant to the City Manager SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION APPROVING A BOUNDARY MAP SHOWING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE TERRITORY PROPOSED FOR INCLUSION IN PROPOSED COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2004- 01 (RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES) RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached resolution adopting a boundary map showing the boundaries of the territory proposed for inclusion in proposed Community Facilities District (CFD) 2004-01 (Rancho Etiwanda Estates). This is a necessary function required for the formation of any CFD. The boundary map clearly identifies the property to be included in the proposed CFD. BACKGROUND The proposed CFD is being requested by the property owner to fund roads, storm drains, parks, water facilities and school facilities to serve the area and their development which is generally located west of Etiwanda Avenue, east of Day Creek Channel, and north of the ultimate extension of Day Creek Boulevard. These facilities will serve the residents in the community by providing needed flood protection, transportation throughout the community, schools, parks and water service to the northeast area of the City. To help fund these improvements, the developer has requested that a CFD be formed. This request is in keeping with the City's policy on CFD formations and all associated costs are being borne by the developer. In order to form the CFD, several preliminary actions are required by the City Council. One of those actions is the adoption of a boundary map that clearly shows which properties are included in the proposed CFD. The attached resolution accomplishes this purpose. APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A BOUNDARY MAP FOR PROPOSED COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2004-01 (RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES) August 4, 2004 Page 2 By adopting this resolution, the City Council is not actually forming the CFD. A public hearing and election of the affected property owners must still be held. After the public hearing the City Council will make the final decision whether or not to form the CFD. This resolution does not obligate the City Council to form the CFD. This action meets the statutory requirements for forming a CFD and all associated costs are borne by the developer with no negative impact to the City's general fund. This action is also consistent with established City policy. For these reasons, it is recommended that the City Council approve this resolution. Re~ctfully submitted, Duane A. Baker Assistant to the City Manager -2- RESOLUTION NO. 2004- ~,.~ (~ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A BOUNDARY MAP SHOWING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE TERRITORY PROPOSED FOR THE INCLUSION IN PROPOSED COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2004-01 (RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES) WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA ("City Council"), in response to a petition received from the owner of certain property located within the City of Rancho Cucamonga identified as Tentative Tract Map Nos. 16226 and 16227 and commonly known as Rancho Etiwanda Estates, desires to initiate proceedings to create a Community Facilities District pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California (the "Act"). This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be designated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2004-01 (RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES) (the "District"); and, WHEREAS, there has been submitted a map showing the boundaries of the territory proposed for inclusion in the District including properties and parcels of land proposed to be subject to the levy of a special tax by the District. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND DETERMINED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1. The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. The map designated as "BOUNDARIES OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2004-01 (RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES)" submitted to the City Council showing the boundaries of the territory proposed for inclusion in the District including properties and parcels of land proposed to be subject to the levy of a special tax by the District is hereby approved. SECTION 3. A certificate shall be endorsed on the original and on at least one (1) copy of the map of the District, evidencing the date and adoption of this Resolution, and within fifteen (15) days after the adoption of the Resolution fixing the time and place of the hearing on the formation or extent of such District, a copy of such map shall be filed with the correct and proper endorsements thereon with the County Recorder, all in the manner and form provided for in Sections 3110 and 3111 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 2004. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: William J. Alexander, Mayor ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk SHEET 1 OF I PROPOSED BOUND~,RIES OF CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2004-01 (RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES) COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORN IA (1) Filed in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucemonga this day of ,2004. ~ ~ ,,., ~0225-081-11 ........ ' '"'1Edison Corridor De bra J. Adams, City Clerk I 0225_071_48 /~q?~' 0225.081.09 LU,q'~, (2) I hereby cer[ity that the within map showing the proposed boundaries of City of Rancho Cucamonga Community /~ I ~ml~ ~ Facilities Distdct No. 2004-01 (Rancho Etiwanda Estates), County of San Bernardino, State of California, ~~.~ ~ was approved by the City Council of the City of Rancho I ,,,~.~07 ~°~ <~ Cucemonga at a regular meeting thereof, heldonthe i-- 02 dayo, ,2004, by its Resolution ~r dison Corridor Debra O. Adams, City Clerk ~ /~ 25TH/ / STREET ~ (3) Filedthis dayof ,2004, atthe Approximate ScaleI 0225-081-05~/ ~ hour of__ o'clock_m, in Book of ~. .... r'~ Maps of Assessment and Community Facilities '// Districts at page and as Instrument No. mode to the Assessor RecorderoftheCountyofSanBernardino, Stateof mops of the County California. of San Bernardino for ~ / / LEO a description of '~he END Larry Walker lines and dimensions LM / / Proposed Boundaries of City of Auditor/Controller-Recorder of County of San Bemardino of each lot and *"¢' Rancho Cucamonga Community parcel. (..) Facilities District No. 2004--01 ~ / / 0225-On1-nn Assessor Parce[ Number Fee Deputy r~ ~' WILSON AVENUE Exempt recording requested, per ~repared by David Taussi(~ & Associates, Inc. , ~ CA Government Code §6103 TH E C I T Y O F ~ANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE: August 4, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Duane A. Baker, Assistant to the City Manager SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION DECLARING INTENTION TO ESTABLISH COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2004-01 (RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES) AND TO AUTHORIZE THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX THEREIN TO FINANCE THE PROVISION OF CERTAIN PUBLIC SERVICES AND THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN PUBLIC FACILITIES RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached resolution declaring its intention to establish Community Facilities District (CFD) 2004-01 (Rancho Etiwanda Estates) and to authorize the levy of a special tax in the CFD to finance the acquisition of certain public facilities. This action is recommended in accordance with the request of the property owner and pursuant to City policy. BACKGROUND The proposed CFD is being requested by the property owner to fund roads, storm drains, parks, water facilities and school facilities to serve the area and their development which is generally located west of Etiwanda Avenue, east of Day Creek Channel, and north of the ultimate extension of Day Creek Boulevard. These facilities will serve the residents in the community by providing needed flood protection, transportation throughout the community, schools, parks and water service to the northeast area of the City. To help fund these improvements, the developer has requested that a CFD be formed. This request is in keeping with the City's policy on CFD formations and all associated costs are being borne by the developer. In order to form the CFD, several preliminary actions are required by the City Council. One of those actions is the adoption of resolution of intention to establish the CFD and to authorize the levy of a special tax to acquire the public facilities. This resolution not only declares the City's intention but also sets a public hearing on the matter. The public hearing is scheduled for September 15, 2004. At the public hearing the City APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION DECLARING INTENTION TO ESTABLISH COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2004-01 (RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES) AND TO AUTHORIZE THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX THEREIN TO FINANCE THE PROVISION OF CERTAIN PUBLIC SERVICES AND THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN PUBLIC FACILITIES August 4, 2004 Page 2 Council will take testimony and make a final determination whether or not to form the district. If the City Council decides to form the CFD then an election is held of the property owners. In this case there is only one property owner and they are requesting the CFD. This resolution does not obligate the City Council to form the CFD. This action meets the statutory requirements for forming a CFD and all associated costs are borne by the developer with no negative impact to the City's general fund. This action is also consistent with established City policy. For these reasons, it is recommended that the City Council approve this resolution. Respectfully submitted, Assistant to the City Manager -2- RESOLUTION NO. 2004 -~ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ESTABLISH COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2004-01 (RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES) AND TO AUTHORIZE THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX THEREIN TO FINANCE THE PROVISIONS OF CERTAIN PUBLIC SERVICES AND THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN PUBLIC FACILITIES WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA (the "City Council"), in response to a petition received from the owner of certain property located within the City of Rancho Cucamonga identified as Tentative Tract Map Nos. 16226 and 16227 and commonly known as Rancho Etiwanda Estates requesting that the City Council initiate proceedings to consider the formation of a community facilities district, desires to initiate such proceedings pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Govern ment Code of the State of California (the "Act") to finance the acquisition or construction of certain public facilities; and WHEREAS, pursuant to such petition the City Council desires to initiate proceedings to consider the formation of such community facilities district which shall hereinafter be referred to as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2004-01 (RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES) (the "District"); and, WHEREAS, this City Council is now required to proceed to adopt its Resolution of Intention to initiate the proceedings for the establishment of such District, to set forth the boundaries for such District, to indicate the type of public facilities proposed to be financed by such District, to indicate the rate and apportion ment of a special tax sufficient to finance the acquisition or construction of such public facilities and the administration of the District and any indebtedness incurred by the District, to set a time and place for a public hearing relating to the establishment of such District; and WHEREAS, a map of such District has been showing the boundaries of the territory proposed for inclusion in the District including properties and parcels of land proposed to be subject to the levy of a special tax by the District has been previously approved by this City Council. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND DETERMINED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1. Recitals. The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. Initiation Of Proceedin.cls. These proceedings are initiated by this City Council pursuant to the authorization of Section 53318 of the Government Code of the State of California. SECTION 3. Boundaries Of District. It is the intention of this City Council to establish a community facilities district pursuant to the provisions of the Act, and to determine the boundaries and parcels on which special taxes may be levied to finance the provision of certain public services and the acquisition of certain public facilities. A description of the boundaries of the territory proposed for inclusion in the District including properties and parcels of land proposed to be subject to the levy of a special tax by the District is as follows: All that property as shown on a map as previously approved by this City Council, such map designated by the name of this District, a copy of which is on file in the Office of the City Clerk and shall remain open for public inspection. SECTION 4. Name Of District. The name of the proposed Community Facilities District to be established shall be known and designated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2004-01 (RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES). SECTION 5. Description Of Public Facilities. It is the further intention of this City Council to finance the acquisition or construction of certain public facilities. A general description of the public facilities to be acquired or constructed is set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. The public facilities described in Exhibit A are facilities which this legislative body is authorized by law to contribute revenue to or to construct, own or operate. It is hereby further determined that the proposed public facilities are necessary to meet increased demands and needs placed upon the City and other public agencies as a result of development within the District. The cost of acquiring or constructing such public facilities includes incidental expenses where applicable including, but not limited to, the costs of planning and designing such facilities; all costs associated with the establishment of the District, the issuance and administration of bonds, including the payment of any rebate obligation due and owing to the federal government, the determination of the amount of any special taxes to be levied, the costs of collecting any special taxes, and costs otherwise incurred in order to carry out the authorized purposes of the District, together with any other expenses incidental to the acquisition, construction, completion and inspection of such facilities SECTION 6. Special Tax. It is hereby further proposed that, except where funds are otherwise available, a special tax sufficient to pay for such public facilities and related incidental expenses authorized by the Act, secured by recordation of a continuing lien against all non-exempt real property in the District, will be levied annually within the boundaries of the District. Under no circumstances will the special tax levied against any parcel used for private residential purposes be increased as a consequence of delinquency or default by the owner of any other pamel or parcels within the District by more than 10 percent. For further particulars as to the rate and method of apportionment of the 2 proposed special tax (the "Rate and Method of Apportionment") reference is made to the attached and incorporated Exhibit B, which sets forth in sufficient detail the method of apportionment to allow each landowner or resident within the proposed District to clearly estimate the maximum amount that such person will have to pay. The Rate and Method of Apportionment also sets forth the tax year after which no further special tax shall be levied or collected against any parcel used for private residential purposes. A parcel shall be considered "used for private residential purposes" not later than the date on which an occupancy permit or the equivalent for private residential use is issued for such parcel. The special taxes herein proposed, to the extent possible, shall be collected in the same manner as ad valorem property taxes or in such other manner at this City Council shall determine, including without limitation, direct billing of the affected property owners, and shall be subject to the same penalties, procedure, sale and lien priority in any case of delinquency as applicable for ad valorem taxes. Any special taxes that may not be collected on the County tax roll shall be collected through a direct billing procedure by the Treasurer of the City, acting for and on behalf of the District. The special tax obligation for any parcel may be prepaid and permanently satisfied in whole or in part pursuant to the provisions therefor contained in the Rate and Method of Apportionment. SECTION 7. Public Hearin.q. NOTICE IS GIVEN THAT ON SEPTEMBER 15, 2004, AT THE HOUR OF 7:00 O'CLOCK P.M., IN THE REGULAR MEETING PLACE OF THE CITY COUNCIL BEING THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, LOCATED AT 10500 CiViC CENTER DRIVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD WHERE THIS CITY COUNCIL WILL CONSIDER THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE PROPOSED COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT, THE PROPOSED METHOD AND APPORTIONMENT OF THE SPECIAL TAX, AND ALL OTHER MATTERS AS SET FORTH IN THIS RESOLUTION OF INTENTION. THAT AT THE ABOVE-MENTIONED TIME AND PLACE FOR PUBLIC HEARING ANY PERSONS INTERESTED, INCLUDING TAXPAYERS AND PROPERTY OWNERS MAY APPEAR AND BE HEARD, AND THAT THE TESTIMONY OF ALL INTERESTED PERSONS FOR OR AGAINST THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE DISTRICT, THE EXTENT OF THE DISTRICT, OR THE FINANCING OF THE PUBLIC FACILITIES, WILL BE HEARD AND CONSIDERED. ANY PROTESTS MAY BE MADE ORALLY OR IN WRITING. HOWEVER, ANY PROTESTS PERTAINING TO THE REGULARITY OR SUFFICIENCY OF THE PROCEEDINGS SHALL BE IN WRITING AND CLEARLY SET FORTH THE IRREGULARITIES AND DEFECTS TO WHICH THE OBJECTION IS MADE. ALL WRITTEN PROTESTS SHALL BE FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY COUNCIL ON OR BEFORE THE TIME FIXED FORTHE PUBLIC HEARING. WRITTEN PROTESTS MAY BE WITHDRAWN IN WRITING AT ANY TiME BEFORE THE CONCLUSION OF THE PUBLIC HEARING. IF A WRITTEN MAJORITY PROTEST AGAINST THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE DISTRICT IS FILED, THE PROCEEDINGS SHALL BE ABANDONED. IF SUCH MAJORITY PROTEST IS LIMITED TO CERTAIN PUBLIC FACILITIES OR PORTIONS OF THE SPECIAL TAX, THOSE FACILITIES OR THAT TAX SHALL BE ELIMINATED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. SECTION 8. Election. If, following the public hearing described in the Section above, the City Council determines to establish the District and proposes to levy a special tax within the District, the City Council shall then submit the levy of the special taxes to the qualified electors of the District. If at least twelve (12) persons, who need not necessarily be the same twelve (12) persons, have been registered to vote within the District for each of the ninety (90) days preceding the close of the public hearing, the vote shall be by registered voters of the District, with each voter having one (1) vote. Otherwise, the vote shall be by the landowners of the District who were the owners of record at the close of the subject hearing, with each landowners or the authorized representative thereof, having one (1) vote for each acre or portion of an acre of land owned within the District. SECTION 9. Notice. Notice of the time and place of the public hearing shall be given by the City Clerk by causing the publication of a Notice of Public Hearing in the legally designated newspaper of general circulation, such publication pursuant to Section 6061 of the Government Code, with such publication to be completed at least seven (7) days prior to the date set for the public hearing. SECTION 10. Reservation Of Rights To Authorize Tender Of Bonds. The City Council reserves to itself, in its capacity as the legislative body of the District if formed, the right and authority to allow any interested owner of property within the District, subject to the provisions of Government Code Section 53344.1 and to such conditions as this City Council may impose, and any applicable prepayment penalties as may be described in the bond indenture or comparable instrument or document, to tender to the Treasurer of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting for and on behalf of the District, in full payment or part payment of any installment of the special taxes or the interest or penalties thereon which may be due or delinquent, but for which a bill has been received, any bond or other obligation secured thereby, the bond or other obligation to be taken at par and credit to be given for the accrued interest shown thereby computed to the date of tender. SECTION 11. Advances Of Funds Or Work-In-Kind. At any time either before or after the formation of the District, the City Council may accept advances of funds or work- in-kind from any source, including, but not limited to, private persons or private entities and may provide, by resolution, for the use of those funds or that work-in-kind for any authorized purpose, including, but not limited to, paying any cost incurred by the City in creating the District. The City may enter into an agreement, by resolution, with the person or entity advancing the funds or work-in-kind, to repay all or a portion of the funds so advanced, or to reimburse the person or entity for the value, or cost, whichever is less, of the work-in-kind, as determined by the City Council. The City has entered into a Community Facilities District Advance and Reimbursement Agreement with BCA Development, Inc. to provide for such advances for the payment of all initial consulting and administration costs and expenses related to the proceedings to consider the formation of the District and to subsequently authorize, issue and sell bonds for the District. Such 4 advances are subject to reimbursement pursuant to the terms of such agreement. No such agreement shall constitute a debt or liability of the City. PASSED, APPROVED, And ADOPTED this day of , 2004. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: William J. Alexander, Mayor ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk Exhibit "A" Description of Public Facilities The public facilities proposed to be financed by the District are generally described as follows: 1. Day Creek Boulevard - grading, storm drain, sewer, water, dry utilities, streets and landscaping. 2. Etiwanda Avenue - grading, sewer, water, dry utilities, streets and landscaping. 3. Cucamonga Valley Water District ("CVWD") reservoir transmission main. 4. Storm drain facilities including the northern property line storm drain and the Etiwanda Avenue storm drain. 5. Park facilities. 6. Equestrian facilities. 7. School facilities to be owned by the Etiwanda School District. 8. School facilities to be owned by the Chaffey Joint Union High School District. 9. Water and sewer facilities to be owned by CVWD which are authorized to be financed from the proceeds of capacity charges levied by CVWD. 10. Flood control facilities to be owned by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District. 11. Open space to be owned by the County of San Bemardino EXHIBIT "B" RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2004-01 OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES) A Special Tax hereinafter defined shall be levied on all Assessor's Parcels of Taxable Property in Community Facilities District No. 2004-01 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ("CFD No. 2004-01") and collected each Fiscal Year commencing in Fiscal Year 2005-06, in an amount determined by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, through the application of the Rate and Method of Apportionment as described below. All of the real property in CFD No. 2004-01, unless exempted by law or by the provisions hereof, shall be taxed for the purposes, to the extent and in the manner herein provided. A. DEFINITIONS The terms hereinafter set forth have the following meanings: "Acre or Acreage" means the land area of an Assessor's Parcel as shown on an Assessor's Parcel Map, or if the land area is not shown on an Assessor's Parcel Map, the land area shown on the applicable final map, parcel map, condominium plan, or other recorded County parcel map. "Act" means the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended, being Chapter 2.5, Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California. "Administrative Expenses" means the following actual or reasonably estimated costs directly related to the administration of CFD No. 2004-01: the costs of computing the Special Taxes and preparing the annual Special Tax collection schedules (whether by the City or designee thereof or both); the costs of collecting the Special Taxes (whether by the County or otherwise); the costs of remitting the Special Taxes to the Fiscal Agent; the costs of the Fiscal Agent (including its legal counsel) in the discharge of the duties required of it under the Indenture; the costs to the City, CFD No. 2004-01 or any designee thereof of complying with arbitrage rebate requirements; the costs to the City, CFD No. 2004-01 or any designee thereof of complying with disclosure requirements applicable to CFD No. 2004-01 and/or the City associated with applicable federal and state securities laws and of the Act; the costs associated with preparing Special Tax disclosure statements and responding to public inquiries regarding the Special Taxes; the costs of the City, CFD No. 2004-01 or any designee thereof related to an appeal of the Special Tax; the costs associated with the release of funds from any escrow account; and the City's annual administration fees and third party expenses. Administrative Expenses shall also include amounts estimated or advanced by the City or CFD No. 2004-01 for any other administrative purposes of CFD No. 2004-01, including attorney's fees and other costs related to commencing and pursuing to completion any foreclosure of delinquent Special Taxes. City of Rancho Cucamonga (Rancho Etiwanda Estates) August 4, 2004 CFDNo. 2004-OI PageI "Assessor's Parcel" means a lot or parcel shown in an Assessor's Parcel Map with an assigned Assessor's parcel number. "Assessor's Parcel Map" means an official map of the County Assessor of the County designating parcels by Assessor's parcel number. "Authorized Facilities" means those authorized improvements, as listed on Exhibit "A" to the Resolution of Formation. "Bonds" means any bonds or other debt (as defined in Section 53317(d) of the Act), whether in one or more series, issued by CFD No. 2004-01 under the Act. "CFD Administrator" means an official of the City, or designee thereof, responsible for determining the Special Tax Requirement and providing for the levy and collection of the Special Taxes. "CFD No. 2004-01" means Community Facilities District No. 2004-01 (Rancho Etiwanda Estates) of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. "City" means the City of Rancho Cucamonga. "Council" means the City Council of the City, acting as the legislative body of CFD No. 2004-01. "County" means the County of San Bernardino. "Developed Property" means for each Fiscal Year, all Taxable Property, exclusive of Taxable Public Property and Taxable Property Owner Association Property, for which a building permit for new construction was issued after March 1, 2004 and prior to March 1 of the prior Fiscal Year. "Fiscal Agent" means the trustee or fiscal agent under the Indenture. "Fiscal Year" means the period starting July 1 and ending on the following June 30. "Indenture" means the bond indenture, fiscal agent agreement, resolution or other instrument pursuant to which Bonds are issued, as modified, amended and/or supplemented from time to time. "Land Use Class" means any of the classes listed in Table 1 below. "Maximum Special Tax" means the Maximum Special Tax, determined in accordance with Section C below that can be levied in any Fiscal Year on any Assessor's Parcel. "Non-Residential Property" means all Assessor's Parcels of Developed Property for which a building permit was issued for a non-residential use. City of Rancho Cucamonga (Rancho Etiwanda Estates) August 4, 2004 CFD No. 2004-01 Page 2 "Outstanding Bonds" means all Bonds which are deemed to be outstanding under the Indenture. "Property Owner Association Property" means, for each Fiscal Year, any property within the boundaries of CFD No. 2004-01 that was owned by a property owner association, including any master or sub-association, as of January 1 of the prior Fiscal Year. "Proportionately" means, for Developed Property, that the ratio of the actual Special Tax levy to the Maximum Special Tax is equal for all Assessor's Parcels of Developed Property. For Undeveloped Property, "Proportionately" means that the ratio of the actual Special Tax levy per Acre to the Maximum Special Tax per Acre is equal for all Assessor's Parcels of Undeveloped Property. The term "Proportionately" shall be similarly applied to other categories of Taxable Property as listed in Section E below. "Public Property" means property within the boundaries of CFD No. 2004-01 owned by, irrevocably offered or dedicated to, or for which an easement for purposes of public right-of- way has been granted to the federal government, the State of California, the County of San Bernardino, the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or any local government or other public agency, provided that any property leased by a public agency to a private entity and subject to taxation under Section 53340.1 of the Act shall be taxed and classified according to its use. "Residential Floor Area" means all of the square footage of living area within the perimeter of a residential structure, not including any carport, walkway, garage, overhang, patio, enclosed patio, or similar area. The determination of Residential Floor Area shall be made by reference to the building permit(s) issued for such Assessor's Parcel. "Residential Property" means all Assessor's Parcels of Developed Property for which a building permit has been issued for purposes of constructing one or more residential dwelling units. "Resolution of Formation" means the Resolution of Formation adopted pursuant to Government Code Section 53325.1 for CFD No. 2004-01. "Special Tax" means the special tax to be levied in each Fiscal Year on each Assessor's Parcel of Taxable Property within CFD No. 2004-01 to fund the Special Tax Requirement. "Special Tax Buydown" means a mandatory bond principal buydown payment made by the property owner to reduce the amount of Outstanding Bonds to compensate for a loss of Special Tax revenues resulting from the construction of fewer residential dwelling units, smaller residential dwelling units, or a modified amount of non-residential Acreage, as determined in accordance with Section D below. "Special Tax Requirement" means that amount required in any Fiscal Year for CFD No. 2004-01 to: (i) pay debt service on all Outstanding Bonds; (ii) pay periodic costs on the Bonds, including but not limited to, credit enhancement and rebate payments on the Bonds; (iii) pay Administrative Expenses; (iv) pay any amounts required to establish or replenish any reserve funds for all Outstanding Bonds; (v) pay directly for acquisition or construction City of Rancho Cucamonga (Rancho Etiwanda Estates) ,4 ugust 4, 2004 CFDNo. 2004-OI Page3 /3¢ of Authorized Facilities to the extent that the inclusion of such amount does not increase the Special Tax levy on Undeveloped Property; (vi) pay for reasonably anticipated Special Tax delinquencies based on the delinquency rate for the Special Tax levy in the previous Fiscal Year; less (vii) a credit for funds available to reduce the annual Special Tax levy, as determined by the CFD Administrator pursuant to the Indenture. "State" means the State of California. "Taxable Property" means all of the Assessor's Parcels within the boundaries of CFD No. 2004-01 which are not exempt from the Special Tax pursuant to law or Section F below. "Taxable Property Owner Association Property" means all Assessor's Parcels of Property Owner Association Property that are not exempt pursuant to the provisions of Section F below. "Taxable Public Property" means all Assessor's Parcels of Public Property that are not exempt pursuant to the provisions of Section F below. "Undeveloped Property" means, for each Fiscal Year, all Taxable Property not classified as Developed Property, Taxable Public Property or Taxable Property Owner Association Property. B. ASSIGNMENT TO LAND USE CATEGORIES Each Fiscal Year, all Taxable Property within CFD No. 2004-01 shall be classified as Developed Property, Taxable Public Property, Taxable Property Owner Association Property, or Undeveloped Property, and shall be subject to Special Taxes in accordance with the rate and method of apportionment determined pursuant to Sections C and E below. Residential Properly shall be assigned to Land Use Classes 1 through 5 and Non-Residential Property shall be assigned to Land Use Class 6. The Maximum Special Tax for Residential Property shall be based on the Residential Floor Area of the dwelling unit(s) located on the Assessor's Parcel. The Maximum Special Tax for Non-Residential Property shall be based on the Acreage of the Assessor's Parcel. The Maximum Special Tax for any Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property containing more than one Land Use Class shall be deternfined pursuant to Section C below. C. MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX 1. Developed Property (a) Maximum Special Tax The Maximum Special Tax for each Assessor's Parcel classified as Developed Property is shown below in Table 1. City of Rancho Cucamonga (Rancho Etiwanda Estates) August 4, 2004 CFD No. 2004-01 Page 4 TABLE 1 Maximum Special Tax for Developed Property in Community Facilities District No. 2004-01 Land Use Class Description Residential Floor Area Maximum Special Tax 1 Residential Property more than 4,000 SF $5,555 per unit 2 Residential Property 3,801 - 4,000 SF $5,414 per unit 3 Residential Property 3,601 - 3,800 SF $5,156 per unit 4 Residential Property 3,400 - 3,600 SF $4,941 per unit 5 Residential Property less than 3,400 SF $4,666 per unit Non-Residential 6 Property NA $20,342 per Acre (b) Multiple Land Use Classes In some instances an Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property may contain more than one Land Use Class. The Maximum Special Tax levied on an Assessor's Parcel shall be the sum of the Maximum Special Taxes for all Land Use Classes located on that Assessor's Parcel. For an Assessor's Parcel that contains both Residential Property and Non-Residential Property, the Acreage of such Assessor's Parcel shall be allocated to each type of property based on the amount of Acreage designated for each land use as determined by reference to the site plan approved for such Assessor's Parcel. The CFD Administrator's allocation to each type of property shall be final. 2. Undeveloped Property, Taxable Public Property, and Taxable Property Owner Association Property (a) Maximum Special Tax The Maximum Special Tax for Undeveloped Property, Taxable Public Property, and Taxable Property Owner Association Property shall be $22,260 per Acre. cFDCity°fRanch°Cucam°nga(Ranch°EtiwandaEstateS)No. 2004-01 August4,2OO4page 5 /~ D. SPECIAL TAX BUYDOWN All of the requirements of this Section D, which describes the need for a Special Tax Buydown that may result fiom a change in development as determined pursuant to this Section D, shall only apply after the sale o£Bonds by CFD No. 2004-01. The foliowing definitions apply to this Section D: "Certificate of Satisfaction of Special Tax Buydown" means a certificate fiom the CFD Administrator stating that the property described in such certificate has sufficiently met the Special Tax Buydown Requirement for such property as calculated under this Section D. "Letter of Compliance" means a letter from the CFD Administrator allowing the issuance of building permits based on the prior submittal of a Request £or Letter of Compliance by a property owner. "Special Tax Buydown Requirement" means the total amount o£ Special Tax Buydown necessary to be prepaid to permit the issuance of building permits listed in a Request for Letter of Compliance, as calculated under this Section D. "Update Property" means an Assessor's Parcel of Undeveloped Property £or which a building permit has been issued. For purposes o£all calculations in this Section D, Update Property shall be taxed as if it were already Developed Property durin~ the current Fiscal Year. 1. Request for Letter of Compliance The CFD Administrator must submit a Letter o£ Compliance to the City £or a specific Assessor's Parcel or lot prior to the issuance by the City o£ a building permit for the construction of any residential and/or non-residential development on that Assessor's Parcel or lot. I£a Letter o£Compliance has not yet been issued, and a property owner wishes to request a building permit for an Assessor's Parcel or lot, the property owner must first request a Letter o£Compliance fiom the CFD Administrator. The request from the property owner shall contain a list of all building permits currently being requested, the Assessor's Parcels or tract and lot numbers on which the construction is to take place, and the Residential Floor Area (£or each residential dwelling unit) or the Acreage (for each non- residential parcel) associated with each building permit. 2. Issuance of Letter of Compliance Upon the receipt ora Request for Letter o£Compliance, the CFD Administrator shall assign each building permit identified in such request to Land Use Classes 1 through 6 as listed in Table 2 below, based on the type of use and the Residential Floor Area identified for each such building permit. If the CFD Administrator determines (i) that the number o£building permits requested for each Land Use Class, plus those building permits previously issued for each Land Use Class, will not cause the total number of residential units or non-residential Acreage within any such Land Use Class to exceed the number of units or Acreage for such Land Use Class identified in Table 2 below, and (ii) that the total number o£ residential City of Rancho Cucamonga (Rancho Etiwanda Estates) August 4, 2004 CFDNo. 2004-O1 Page6 dwelling units anticipated to be constructed pursuant to the current development plan for CFD No. 2004-01 shall not be less than 632, then a Letter of Compliance shall be submitted to the City by the CFD Administrator approving the issuance of the requested building permits. This Letter of Compliance shall be submitted to the City by the CFD Administrator within ten days of the submittal of the Request for Letter of Compliance by the property owner. However, should (i) the building permits requested, plus those previously issued, cause the total number of residential units or non-residential Acreage within any such Land Use Class to exceed the number of units or non-residential Acreage for such Land Use Class identified in Table 2 below, or (ii) the CFD Administrator determine that changes in the development plan may cause a decrease in the number of residential dwelling units within CFD No. 2004-01 to below 632 dwelling units, then a Letter of Compliance will not be issued and the CFD Administrator will be directed to determine if a Special Tax Buydown shall be required. TABLE 2 Expected Dwelling Units and Non-Residential Acreage per Land Use Class Community Facilities District No. 2004-01 Land Use Class Description Residential Floor Area Number of Units/Acres 1 Residential Property 'more than 4,000 SF 70 units 2 Residential Property 3,801 - 4,000 SF 94 units 3 Residential Property 3,601 - 3,800 SF 131 units 4 Residential Property 3,401 - 3,600 SF 172 units 5 Residential Property less than 3,400 SF 165 units Non-Residential 6 NA 0.00 acres Property 3. Calculation of Special Tax Buydown If a Special Tax Buydown calculation is required as a result of item 2, above, the CFD Administrator shall review the current development plan for CFD No. 2004-01 in consultation with the current property owners for all remaining Undeveloped Property in CFD No. 2004-01, and shall prepare an updated version of Table 2 identifying the revised number of units or non-residential Acreage anticipated within each Land Use Class. The CFD Administrator shall not be responsible for any delays in preparing the updated Table 2 that results from a refusal on the part of one or more current property owners of Undeveloped Property to provide information on their future development. City of Rancho Cucamonga (Rancho Etiwanda Estates) August 4, 2004 CFDNo. 2004-O1 Page7 /~ The CFD Administrator shall then review the updated Table 2 and determine the Special Tax Buydown Requirement, if any, to be applied to the property identified in the Request for Letter of Compliance to assure the CFD's ability to collect special taxes equal to 110% debt service coverage on the Outstanding Bonds, plus the cost of annual CFD administration. The calculations shall be undertaken by the CFD Administrator, based on the data in the updated Table 2, as follows: Step 1. Compute the sum of the Maximum Special Tax to be levied on all Developed Property and Update Property within CFD No. 2004-01, plus the sum of the Maximum Special Tax to be levied on all future development as identified in the current development plan as determined by the CFD Administrator in consultation with the property owner(s). Step 2. Determine the amount of Special Tax required to provide 110% debt service coverage on the Outstanding Bonds, plus any other costs associated with the Special Tax Requirement. Step 3. If the total sum computed pursuant to step 1 is greater than or equal to the amount computed pursuant to step 2, then no Special Tax Buydown will be required and a Letter of Compliance shall immediately be issued by the CFD Administrator for all of the building permits currently being requested. If the total sum computed pursuant to step 1 is less than the amount computed pursuant to step 2, then continue to step 4. Step 4. Determine the Maximum Special Tax shortfall by subtracting the total sum computed pursuant to step 1 from the amount computed pursuant to step 2. Divide this Maximum Special Tax shortfall by the amount computed pursuant to step 2. Step 5.The Special Tax Buydown Requirement shall be calculated using the prepayment formula described in Section I. 1, with the following exceptions: (i) skip Paragraphs 1, 2 and 3, and begin with Paragraph 4; (ii) the Bond Redemption Amount in Paragraph 4 of the prepayment formula described in Section I. 1 shall equal the product of the quotient computed pursuant to step 4 above times the Previously Issued Bonds, as defined in Section 1.1; (iii) the Capitalized Interest Credit described in Paragraph 11 of Section I. 1 shall be $0; and (iv) any payments of the Special Tax Buydown (less Administrative Fees and Expenses) shall be disbursed pursuant to the Indenture. The Special Tax Buydown computed under step 5 shall be billed directly to the property owner of each Assessor's Parcel identified in the Request for Letter of Compliance and shall be due within 30 days of the billing date. If the Special Tax Buydown is not paid within 45 days of the billing date, a delinquent penalty of 10 percent shall be added to the Special Tax Buydown. Upon receipt of the Special Tax Buydown payment, the CFD Administrator shall issue a Letter of Compliance and a Certificate of Satisfaction of Special Tax Buydown for the subject property. City of Rancho Cucamonga (Rancho Etiwanda Estates) August 4, 2004 CFDNo. 2004-OI Page8 4. Costs and Expenses Related to Implementation of Special Tax Buydown The property owner of each Assessor's Parcel identified in the Request for Letter of Compliance shall pay all costs of the CFD Administrator or other consultants required to review the application for building permits, calculate the Special Tax Buydown, issue Letters of Compliance or any other actions required under Section D. Such payments shall be due 30 days after receipt of invoice by such property owner. A deposit may be required by the CFD Administrator prior to undertaking work related to the Special Tax Buydown. E. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF THE SPECIAL TAX Commencing with Fiscal Year 2005-06 and for each following Fiscal Year, the Council shall determine the Special Tax Requirement and shall levy the Special Tax until the total Special Tax levy equals the Special Tax Requirement. The Special Tax shall be levied each Fiscal Year as follows: First: The Special Tax shall be levied on each Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property in an amount equal to 100% of the applicable Maximum Special Tax; Second: If additional monies are needed to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement after the first step has been completed, the Special Tax shall be levied Proportionately on each Assessor's Parcel of Undeveloped Property at up to 100% of the Maximum Special Tax for Undeveloped Property; Third: If additional monies are needed to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement after the first two steps have been completed, then the Special Tax shall be levied Proportionately on each Assessor's Parcel of Taxable Property Owner Association Property at up to the Maximum Special Tax for Taxable Property Owner Association Property; Fourth: If additional monies are needed to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement after the first three steps have been completed, then the Special Tax shall be levied Proportionately on each Assessor's Parcel of Taxable Public Property at up to the Maximum Special Tax for Taxable Public Property; Notwithstanding the above the Council may, in any Fiscal Year, levy Proportionately less than 100% of the Maximum Special Tax in step one (above), when (i) the Council is no longer required to levy the Special Tax pursuant to steps two through four above in order to meet the Special Tax Requirement; and (ii) all authorized CFD No. 2004-01 Bonds have already been issued or the Council has covenanted that it will not issue any additional CFD No. 2004-01 Bonds (except refunding bonds) to be supported by the Special Tax. Further notwithstanding the above, under no circumstances will the Special Tax levied against any Assessor's Parcel of Residential Property for which an occupancy permit for private residential use has been issued be increased by more than ten percent as a consequence of delinquency or default by the owner of any other Assessor's Parcel within CFD No. 2004-01. City of Rancho Cucamonga (Rancho Etiwanda Estates) August 4, 2004 CFD No. 2004-01 Page 9 F. EXEMPTIONS No Special Tax shall be levied on up to 78.75 Acres of Public Property and/or Property Owner Association Property. Tax-exempt status will be irrevocably assigned by the CFD Administrator in the chronological order in which property becomes Public Property or Property Owner Association Property. However, should an Assessor's Parcel no longer be classified as Public Property or Property Owner Association Property its tax-exempt status will be revoked. Public Property or Property Owner Association Property that is not exempt from the Special Tax under this section shall be subject to the levy of the Special Tax and shall be taxed Proportionately as part of the third and fourth steps in Section E above, at up to 100% of the applicable Maximum Special Tax for Taxable Public Property or Taxable Property Owner Association Property. G. APPEALS AND INTERPRETATIONS Any landowner or resident who feels that the amount of the Special Tax levied on their Assessor's Parcel is in error may submit a written appeal to CFD No. 2004-01. The CFD Administrator shall review the appeal and if the CFD Administrator concurs, the amount of the Special Tax levied shall be appropriately modified. The Council may interpret this Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Tax for purposes of clarifying any ambiguity and make determinations relative to the annual administration of the Special Tax and any landowner or resident appeals. Any decision of the Council shall be final and binding as to all persons. H. MANNER OF COLLECTION The Special Tax will be collected in the same manner and at the same time as ordinary ad valorem property taxes; provided, however, that CFD No. 2004-01 may directly bill the Special Tax, may collect Special Taxes at a different time or in a different manner if necessary to meet its financial obligations, and may covenant to foreclose and may actually foreclose on delinquent Assessor's Parcels as permitted by the Act. I. PREPAYMENT OF SPECIAL TAX The following definition applies to this Section I: "Previously Issued Bonds" means, for any Fiscal Year, all Outstanding Bonds that are deemed to be outstanding under the Indenture after the first interest and/or principal payment date following the current Fiscal Year. Only an Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property, or Undeveloped Properly for which a building permit has been issued, may be prepaid. The Special Tax obligation applicable to an Assessor's Parcel in CFD No. 2004-01 may only be prepaid after all authorized CFD No. City of Rancho Cucamonga (Rancho Etiwanda Estates) ~4ugust 4, 2004 CFD No. 2004-01 Page 10 2004-01 Bonds have already been issued, or after the Council has covenanted that it will not issue any additional CFD No. 2004-01 Bonds (except refunding bonds) to be supported by Special Taxes levied under this Rate and Method of Apportionment. The obligation of the Assessor's Parcel to pay any Special Tax may be permanently satisfied as described herein, provided that a prepayment may be made with respect to a particular Assessor's Parcel only if there are no delinquent Special Taxes with respect to such Assessor's Parcel at the time of prepayment. An owner of an Assessor's Parcel intending to prepay the Special Tax obligation shall provide the CFD Administrator with written notice of intent to prepay. Within 30 days of receipt of such written notice, the CFD Administrator shall notify such owner of the prepayment amount of such Assessor's Parcel. Prepayment must be made not less than 45 days prior to any redemption date for the CFD No. 2004-01 Bonds to be redeemed with the proceeds of such prepaid Special Taxes. The Prepayment Amount (defined below) shall be calculated as summarized below (capitalized terms as defined below): Bond Redemption Amount plus Redemption Premium plus Defeasance Amount plus Administrative Fees and Expenses less Reserve Fund Credit less Capitalized Interest Credit Total: equals Prepayment Amount As of the proposed date of prepayment, the Prepayment Amount (defined below) shall be calculated as follows: Paragraph No.: 1. Confirm that no Special Tax delinquencies apply to such Assessor's Parcel. 2. For Assessor's Parcels of Developed Property, compute the Maximum Special Tax for the Assessor's Parcel to be prepaid. For Assessor's Parcels of Undeveloped Property for which building permits have already been issued, compute the Maximum Special Tax for the Assessor's Parcel to be prepaid as though it were already designated as Developed Property, based upon the building permit which has been issued for that Assessor's Parcel. 3. Divide the Maximum Special Tax computed pursuant to paragraph 2 by the estimated Maximum Special Taxes for CFD No. 2004-01 based on the Developed Property Special Taxes which could be charged in the current Fiscal Year on all expected development in CFD No. 2004-01, excluding any Assessor's Parcels which have been prepaid; and 4. Multiply the quotient computed pursuant to paragraph 3 by the Previously Issued Bonds to compute the amount of Previously Issued Bonds to be retired and prepaid; and City of Rancho Cucamonga (Rancho Etiwanda Estates) ~4ugust 4, 2004 CFDNo. 2004-O1 Pagell 5. Multiply the Bond Redemption Amount computed pursuant to paragraph 4 by the applicable redemption premium (e.g., the redemption price- 100%), if any, on the Previously Issued Bonds to be redeemed (the "Redemption Premium"). 6. Compute the amount needed to pay interest on the Bond Redemption Amount from the first bond interest and/or principal payment date not covered by the current Fiscal Year Special Taxes until the earliest redemption date for the Previously Issued Bonds.. 7. Determine the Special Taxes levied on the Assessor's Parcel in the current Fiscal Year that have not yet been paid. 8. Add the amounts computed pursuant to paragraphs 6 and 7. 9. Compute the net present value of the amount computed pursuant to paragraph 8, using as a discount rate the rate of return reasonably assumed for the conservative investment of these funds by the CFD Administrator (the "Defeasance Amount"). 10. The administrative fees and expenses of CFD No. 2004-01 are as calculated by the CFD Administrator and include the costs of computation of the prepayment, the costs to invest the prepayment proceeds, the costs of redeeming CFD No. 2004-01 Bonds, and the costs of recording any notices to evidence the prepayment and the redemption (the "Administrative Fees and Expenses"). 11. The reserve fund credit (the "Reserve Fund Credit") shall equal thc lesser of: (a) the expected reduction in the reserve requirement (as defined in the Indenture), if any, associated with the redemption of Previously Issued Bonds as a result of the prepayment, or (b) the amount derived by subtracting the new reserve requirement (as defined in the Indenture) in effect after the redemption of Previously Issued Bonds as a result of the prepayment from the balance in the reserve fund on the prepayment date, but in no event shall such amount be less than zero. No Reserve Fund Credit shall be granted if the amount then on deposit in the reserve fund for the Previously Issued Bonds is below 100% of the reserve requirement (as defined in the Indenture). 12. If any capitalized interest for the Previously Issued Bonds will not have been expended as of the date immediately following the first bond interest and/or principal payment date following the current Fiscal Year, a capitalized interest credit shall be calculated by multiplying the quotient computed pursuant to paragraph 3 by the expected balance in the capitalized interest fund after such first interest and/or principal payment (the "Capitalized Interest Credit"). City of Rancho Cucamonga (Rancho Etiwanda Estates) August 4, 2004 CFD No. 2004-01 Page 12 13. The Special Tax prepayment is equal to the sum of the amounts computed pursuant to paragraphs 4, 5, 9, and 10, less the amounts computed pursuant to paragraphs 11 and 12 (the "Prepayment Amount"). From the Prepayment Amount, the amounts computed pursuant to paragraphs 4, 5, 9, 10,11 and 12 shall be deposited into the appropriate fund as established under the Indenture and be used to redeem Previously Issued Bonds, as applicable, or make scheduled debt service payments or to pay administrative expenses related to the prepayment of the Special Tax. The Prepayment Amount may be insufficient to redeem a full $5,000 increment of CFD No. 2004-01 Bonds. In such cases, the increment above $5,000 or integral multiple thereof will be retained in the appropriate fund established under the Indenture to be used with the next prepayment of CFD No. 2004-01 Bonds or to make scheduled debt service payments on such bonds. Upon confirmation of the payment of the current Fiscal Year's Special Tax levy as determined under paragraph 7 (above), the CFD Administrator shall remove the current Fiscal Year's Special Tax levy for such Assessor's Parcel from the County tax rolls. With respect to any Assessor's Parcel for which the Special Tax obligation is prepaid in full in accordance with this Section I., the Council shall cause a suitable notice to be recorded in compliance with the Act, to indicate the prepayment of Special Taxes and the release of the Special Tax lien on such Assessor's Parcel, and the obligation of such Assessor's Parcel to pay the Special Tax shall cease. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no Special Tax prepayment shall be allowed unless, at the time of such proposed prepayment, the amount of Maximum Special Taxes that may be levied on Taxable Property within CFD No. 04-1 (after excluding 78.75 Acres of Public Property and Property Owner Association Property as set forth in Section F) both prior to and after the proposed prepayment is at least 1.1 times the maximum annual debt service on all Previously Issued Bonds, plus the cost of annual CFD administration. I. TERM OF SPECIAL TAX The Special Tax shall be levied for a period not to exceed fifty years commencing with Fiscal Year 2005-06, provided however that Special Taxes will cease to be levied in an earlier Fiscal Year if the CFD Administrator has determined (i) that all required interest and principal payments on the CFD No. 2004-01 Bonds have been paid; and (ii) all Authorized Facilities have been constructed. C:~HOME~Rancho Cucamonga\CFD 2004-01 _5.doc City of Rancho Cucamonga (Rancho Etiwanda Estates) August 4, 2004 CFD No. 2004-01 Pagel3 /q~ TH E C lTV 0 F I l~A N C H 0 C U CAH 0 N GA SlaffReport DATE: August 4, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Duane A. Baker, Assistant to the City Manager SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION ORDERING AND DIRECTING THE PREPARATION OF A REPORT FOR PROPOSED COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2004-01 (RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES) RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached resolution ordering and directing the preparation of a report for proposed Community Facilities District (CFD) 2004-01 (Rancho Etiwanda Estates). This special tax report is necessary to provide the City Council with information on the proposed CFD with which to base their final decision. The action is recommended in accordance with the request of the property owner and pursuant to City policy. BACKGROUND The proposed CFD is being requested by the property owner to fund roads, storm drains, parks, water facilities and school facilities to serve the area and their development which is generally located west of Etiwanda Avenue, east of Day Creek Channel, and north of the ultimate extension of Day Creek Boulevard. These facilities will serve the residents in the community by providing needed flood protection, transportation throughout the community, schools, parks and water service to the northeast area of the City. To help fund these improvements, the developer has requested that a CFD be formed. This request is in keeping with the City's policy on CFD formations and all associated costs are being borne by the developer. In order to form the CFD, several preliminary actions are required by the City Council. One of those actions is the preparation of a special tax report to provide the City Council with necessary information and findings on which they can base their final decision on whether or not to form the CFD. Generally, the report will contain a full and complete description of the public facilities to be acquired; a general cost estimate setting forth the costs of acquiring the public facilities and providing the specified public services; APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION ORDERING AND DIRECTING THE PREPARATION OF A REPORT FOR PROPOSED COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2004-01 (RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES) August 4, 2004 Page 2 and the particulars of the rate and method of apportionment for the proposed special tax. This action meets the statutory requirements for forming a CFD and all associated costs are borne by the developer with no negative impact to the City's general fund. This action is also consistent with established City policy. For these reasons, it is recommended that the City Council approve this resolution. Respectfully submitted, Duane A. Baker Assistant to the City Manager -2- RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING AND DIRECTING THE PREPARATION OF A REPORT FOR PROPOSED COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2004-01 (RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES) WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA (the "City Council"), has declared its intention to initiate proceedings to consider the creation of a Community Facilities District pursuant to the terms and previsions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California (the "Act"). This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be designated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO 2004-01 (RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES) (the "District"); and, WHEREAS, this City Council directs, pursuant to the provisions of Section 53321.5 of the Government Code of the State of California, the preparation of a report to provide more detailed information relating to the proposed District, the proposed public facilities to be financed through the District, and estimate of the cost of providing such facilities (the "Special Tax Report"). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND DETERMINED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1. The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. The City Manager is hereby directed and ordered to prepare or cause to be prepared the Special Tax Report to be presented to this City Council, generally setting forth and containing the following: FACILITIES: A full and complete description of the public facilities the acquisition or construction of which is proposed to be financed through the District. COST ESTIMATE: A general cost estimate setting forth costs of acquiring or constructing such public facilities. SPEClAL TAX: Further particulars regarding the rate and method of apportionment for the proposed special tax. SECTION 3. The Special Tax Report, upon its preparation, shall be submitted to this City Council for review, and such report shall be made a part of the record of the public hearing on the Resolution of Intention to establish such District. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 2004. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: William J. Alexander, Mayor ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk T H E C I T Y OF I I [~ANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE: Au~ust 4, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Duane A. Baker, Assistant to the City Manager SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION DECLARING INTENTION TO ISSUE BONDS SECURED BY SPECIAL TAXES TO PAY FOR THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN FACILITIES IN PROPOSED COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2004-01 (RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES) RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached resolution declaring its intention to issue bonds secured by special taxes to pay for the acquisition of certain facilities in proposed Community Facilities District (CFD) 2004-01 (Rancho Etiwanda Estates). The total amount of bonds necessary to acquire the facilities is estimated to be $45,000,000.00. This is a necessary function required for the formation of any CFD. In order to acquire the public facilities, it is necessary to issue bonds which are secured by the special taxes collected by the CFD. BACKGROUND The proposed CFD is being requested by the property owner to fund roads, storm drains, parks, water facilities and school facilities to serve the area and their development which is generally located west of Etiwanda Avenue, east of Day Creek Channel, and north of the ultimate extension of Day Creek Boulevard. These facilities will serve the residents in the community by providing needed flood protection, transportation throughout the community, schools, parks and water service to the northeast area of the City. To help fund these improvements, the developer has requested that a CFD be formed. This request is in keeping with the City's policy on CFD formations and all associated costs are being borne by the developer. In order to form the CFD, several preliminary actions are required by the City Council. One of those actions is the adoption of resolution of intention to issue bonds. The debt service for these bonds will be secured by special taxes collected by the CFD for this specific purpose. The attached resolution accomplishes this purpose. APPROVal Of a RESOLUTION DECLARING INTENTION TO ISSUE BONDS SECURED BY SPECIAL TAXES TO PAY FOR THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN FACILITIES IN PROPOSED COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2004-01 (RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES) August 4, 2004 Page 2 By adopting this resolution, the City Council is not actually forming the CFD. A public hearing and election of the affected property owners must still be held. After the public hearing the City Council will make the final decision whether or not to form the CFD. This resolution does not obligate the City Council to form the CFD. This action meets the statutory requirements for forming a CFD and all associated costs are borne by the developer with no negative impact to the City's general fund. This action is also consistent with established City policy. For these reasons, it is recommended that the City Council approve this resolution. R~.~.~C.,..~ectfu I ly sub mitted, Duane A. Baker Assistant to the City Manager -2- RESOLUTION NO. L/~/-/J-~'Sl~:/j' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING INTENTION TO ISSUE BONDS SECURED BY SPECIAL TAXES TO PAY FOR THE ACQUISITION OR CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN PUBLIC FACILITIES IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2004-01 (RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES) WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA (the "City Council"), has initiated proceedings to create a Community Facilities District pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of lg82", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California (the "Act") to finance the acquisition or construction of certain authorized public facilities. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2004-01 (RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES) (the "District"); and, WHEREAS, it is the intention of this legislative body to finance the acquisition of all or a portion of such public facilities through the issuance of bonds, such bonds to be secured by special taxes to be levied on taxable property within the District, all as authorized pursuant to the Act. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND DETERMINED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1. The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. This City Council declares that the public convenience and necessity requires that a bonded indebtedness be incurred to finance the acquisition or construction of all or a portion of certain public facilities as proposed for the designated District. SECTION 3. The purpose for the proposed debt is to finance the acquisition or construction of authorized public facilities consisting of the public facilities described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 4. The amount of the proposed bonded indebtedness, including the cost of the facilities, together with all incidental expenses, contingencies and financing costs is generally estimated to be: $45,000,000 SECTION 5. NOTICE IS GIVEN THAT ON SEPTEMBER 15, 2004, AT THE HOUR OF 7:00 O'CLOCK P.M. IN THE REGULAR MEETING PLACE OF THE LEGISLATIVE BODY, BEING THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, LOCATED AT 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, A HEARING WILL BE HELD ON THE INTENTION OF THIS LEGISLATIVE BODY TO INCUR A BONDED 1 INDEBTEDNESS TO FINANCE PUBLIC FACILITIES IN THE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT BY THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX. AT THE TIME AND PLACE FIXED FOR SAID PUBLIC HEARING ANY PERSONS INTERESTED, INCLUDING PERSONS OWNING PROPERTY WITHIN THE AREA, MAY APPEAR AND PRESENT ANY MATTERS RELATING TO THE PROPOSED INTENTION AND NECESSITY FOR INCURRING THE BONDED INDEBTEDNESS WHICH WILL PAY FOR ALL OR A PORTION OF THE PROPOSED PUBLIC FACILITIES AND WHICH WILL BE SECURED BYA SPECIAL TAXTO BE LEVIED WITHIN SAID COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT. SECTION 6. Notice of the time and place of the public hearing shall be given bythe City Clerk by publishing a Notice of Public Hearing in a legally designated newspaper of general circulation, such publication pursuant to Section 6061 of the Government Code, with said publication to be completed at least seven (7) days prior to the date set for the public hearing. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of 2004. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: William J. Alexander, Mayor ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk EXHIBIT A DESCRIPTION OF PUBLIC FACILITIES The public facilities proposed to be financed by the District are generally described as follows: 1. Day Creek Boulevard - grading, storm drain, sewer, water, dry utilities, streets and landscaping. 2. Etiwanda Avenue - grading, sewer, water, dry utilities, streets and landscaping. 3. Cucamonga Valley Water District ("CVWD") reservoir transmission main. 4. Storm drain facilities including the northern property line storm drain and the Etiwanda Avenue storm drain. 5. Park facilities. 6. Equestrian facilities. 7. School facilities to be owned by the Etiwanda School District. 8. School facilities to be owned by the Chaffey Joint Union High School District. 9. Water and sewer facilities to be owned by CVWD which are authorized to be financed from the proceeds of capacity charges levied by CVWD. 10. Flood control facilities to be owned by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District. 11. Open space to be owned by the County of San Bernardino R A C H O C U C A M O N G ^ 'E NG1NI~I~I~ING DI~DADTHI~NT StaffR port DATE: August 4, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Erica Darplee, Management Analyst I SUBJECt: APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, IN SUPPORT OF MEASURE I WHICH WILL BE PLACED ON THE NOVEMBER 2004 BALLOT FOR VOTER APPROVAL. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended the City Council adopt Resolution No. __ in support of Measure I, San Bernardino County's one-half of one pement sales tax for transportation improvements, scheduled for voter consideration on the November 2, 2004 ballot. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: San Bernardino County voters approved Measure I, the County's one-half of one percent transactions and use tax for transportation improvements, in November 1959. Since its inception, Measure I has provided funding for numerous transportation projects, including public buses, traffic signals, and more. The current Measure I provision will expire in 2009, and a new ballot measure is underway to extend the existing tax. Should the Measure I extension meet with voter approval, it would mean that many transportation improvements would be possible for the community in Rancho Cucamonga. Some of the major projects would include new 1-15 interchanges at Arrow Route and Base Line, major road improvements on Foothill Boulevard and Base Line Road, as well as millions for local street improvement projects. Since its inception, Measure I funds have provided for numerous transportation improvements throughout San Bernardino County. To date, over $13 million in Measure I funding has been used for overlay, widening and signal projects in Rancho Cucamonga alone. The Measure I extension is estimated to raise neady $6 billion for transportation projects countywide if passed. This will include major improvements to all local freeways and highways, expanding public transit for commuters, seniors and riders with disabilities and providing cities funding to maintain and improve local streets and roads. The most CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL TO SUPPORT THE MEASURE I EXTENSION UP FOR VOTER APPROVAL ON NOVEMBER 2, 2004 JULY 11,2003 PAGE 2 compelling reason for the extension is the fact that the population of San Bernardino County will increase from 1.7 million residents to 2.6 million by the year 2025, an increase of over 50% in the next 20 years. San Bernardino County will need a transportation system that can accommodate this rapid growth, and the extension of Measure I will provide the funds necessary to meet this growth. Re_sp~c..tfully submitted, VVilJ~m J. O'Neil City Engineer RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUOAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, IN SUPPORT OF THE MEASURE I EXTENSION WHICH WILL BE PLACED ON THE NOVEMBER 2004 BALLOT FOR VOTER APPROVAL WHEREAS, since 1990, Measure I has supplied San Bernardino County with the funding to provide its residents with safer roads, more reliable public transit and traffic congestion relief; and WHEREAS, San Bernardino County is one of the most rapidly growing counties in California and is anticipated to grow to a population of more than 2.6 million people by the year 2025; and WHEREAS, a substantial level of transportation funding throughout San Bemardino County and its cities is provided by Measure I; and WHEREAS, extending Measure I will raise nearly $6 billion for much needed transportation projects, programs and improvements in San Bernardino County between 2010 and 2040; and WHEREAS, Measure I will provide major improvements to all freeways and highways within the county; and WHEREAS, Measure I will expand public transit programs and options for commuters, seniors and riders with disabilities; and WHEREAS, Measure I will provide the crucial funding needed for communities such as Rancho Cucamonga to maintain and improve local streets and roads; and WHEREAS, if Measure I is not extended, the transportation network within San Bernardino County would be seriously crippled, adversely affecting commuters and residents throughout the county; and WHEREAS, by passing Measure I on the November 2004 ballot, San Bernardino County will ensure a stable source of locally controlled funding to relieve traffic congestion, increase public transit programs, build new highways and improve local streets; and CITY COUNC1L RESOLUTION NO. MEASURE I August 4, 2004 Page 2 WHEREAS, passing Measure I would ensure that the City of Rancho Cucamonga would be able to provide a safer environment to their residents and maintain the high quality of life we enjoy. NOW, THEREFORE be it resolved that the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby supports the passage of Measure I on the November 2nd, 2004 ballot. T H E C I T Y 0 F I~ANCHO C'UCAH ONGA Memorandum DATE: August 4, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of City Council ICP, City Manager ..~/~rad BT.ller, City Planner '~UEMECT: CITY COUNCIL AGENDA FOR 8/4~04, ITEM F1 AND F2 (CONSENT ORDINANCES) The Project EIR Consultant for the Traigh Pacific project (Michael Brandman Associates) submitted the attached memorandum in response to Mr. Craig Sherman's comments made at the previous public hearing. The Planning Division is requesting to pull these items from the Consent Calendar in order to enter the additional clarification to the public record. Thank you. BB:Is cc: Debbie Adams, City Clerk August 3, 2004 . Larry Henderson City of Rancho Cucamonga ~ 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Subject: Clarification of Sewer Line Issues on the Tracy EIR Dear Mr. Henderson: In preparation for thc City Council meeting tomorrow, MBA would like to provide the folh~wing information to clarify materials already presented in the Draft EIR, Final EIR, and additional responses to written and verbal comments made regarding thc Tracy project by Mr. Sherman, an attorney with the Spirit of thc Sage Council. At the City Council meeting on July 21, 2004, Craig Sherman with the Spirit of the Sage Council stated that the EIR did not address impacts of extending a sewer line 3 miles in existing public rights-of-way (existing roads) to serve the project site. Thc Draft EIR did state in Section 3.11.3, Utilities, that a sewer line would need to be extended approximately 13,000 feet along East Avenue from the project boundary south almost to the 1-15 Freeway to serve the proposed project. The Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD-now the Cucamonga Valley Water District) approved its most recent "Waste Water System Master Plan" (WWSMP) in April of 2003. Prepared by Montgomery Watson Engineering, the plan shows the "East Avenue/Highland Trunk" main sewer line is planned to eventually serve the project area (page 4-1). The Master Plan indicates that local service lines will be connected to this trunk line as needed as growth occurs, as in the case of Tentative Tract 14749 (Tracy). In addition, the WWSMP projects future sewage flows based on planned land uses, and the proposed Tracy project is consistent with the land uses indicated for the project area (i.e., very low and low density residential uses). Because this work will be within existing rights-of-way, no impacts to biological or firchaeological resources are expected. The air quality analysis for this project was prepared by The Chambers Group, Inc. The amount and type of emissions expected from this type of sewer line construction would be similar to those already estimated in the EIR. The EIR concluded that construction of the proposed project, even without the proposed sewer line would create significant short-term air quality impacts due to NOx and ROG emissions. The additional emissions from construction of the sewer pipeline would incrementally increase project-related emissions, as shown in Table 3.6-3 from the Draft EIR, and the new Table 1 in this section. However, this additional information does not change the conclusion or proposed mitigation measures of the Tracy EIR because pipeline projects are regulated by standard codes and procedures already in place and implemented by or required by the City for construction of such projects. Larry Henderson City of Rancho Cucamonga August 3, 2004 Page 2 (Table from Dmfr EIR) Table 3.6-3 Daily Construction Emissions (pounds/day) Description CO NO~ ROG PM~0 Total Daily Construction Emissions~ 56.5 135.3 1,408.7 58.6 SCAQMD Daily Thresholds 550 100 75 150 Exceeds Thresholds? No Yes Yes No Total Quarterly Conslraction Emissions (tons)2 2.4 5.9 16.6 2.5 ,SCAQMD Quarterly Thresholds (tons) 24.75 2.5 2.5 6.75 iExceeds Thresholds? No Yes Yes No Soul'ce: The Chambers Group, Inc. 2000 ~ Value assumes that all aspects of construction overlap on a daily basis. In actuality, daily emissions would be less 2 Assumes construction occurs 77 days per quarter with ten days devoted to of asphalt application and 23 days devoted to the application of paims and coatings Note: high calculated ROG emissions result from "worst case" SCAQMD modeling Table 1 Estimated Emissions from East Avenue Sewer Line Extension (pounds/day) Desnription CO NOx ROG PM~o Sewer Line Construction Emissions~ 28.9 39.9 4.7 2.3 DEIR Daily Construction Emissions from Table 3.6-3) 56.5 135.3 1,408.7 58.6 New Total Daily Emissions 85.4 175.2 1,413.4 60.9 SCAQMD Daily Thresholds 550 100 75 150 Exceeds Thresholds? No Yes Yes No Conclusions Changed from Dmt~ E1R? No No No No Source: Michael Brandman Associates July 2004 ~ see Appendix A The City of Rancho Cucamonga has standard conditions of approval for private projects and standard operating procedures for construction of its own public works projects. These measures are applicable to consamction of a pipeline within the right-of-way of an existing road, such as the proposed sewer line within East Avenue. Construction of this line will cause minor temporary impacts such as traffic delays LanT Henderson City of Rancho Cucamonga A6gust 3, 2004 Page 3 ~long East Avenue and feeder streets from Wilson Avenue south to the 1-15 Freeway. These potential impacts are effectively controlled by standard mitigation measures such as: · Standard traffic control and routing procedures (e.g., flag personnel, lane closures, signs notifying drivers of delay and detour routes, etc.); · Dust control and other vehicular emission controls on construction equipment; and · Regular watering of exposed soil and other standard erosion/dust control measures' which help protect water quality. In addition, the EIR contained the following mitigation measures that apply to onsite and offsite improvements or activities: 3-4 Requires a Dust Control Plan for each phase; 4-4 Requires a Water Quality Management Plan; 4-5 Paving permit to meet NPDES requirements; 5-3 East Avenue road construction from project south to 23rd Avenue (partially includes segment of roadway for new sewer line installation); and 5-6 "Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the developer shall coordinate all construction- related activities to minimize congestion and delay on local roadways, to the satisfaction of City Engineer." Summary Any potential impacts from sewer line expansion in an existing roadway are well within the order of magnitude estimated for all construction activities for the Tracy project. The EIR concluded that NOx and ROG emissions from construction would be significant (i.e.,. would exceed SCAQMD daily thresholds). Even adding emissions separately from the sewer extension project onto project construction emissions will not change the conclusions of the EIR regarding short-term air quality impacts (i.e.,. significant for NOx and ROG). Sincerely, MICHAEL BRANDMAN ASSOCIATES Kent Norton, AICP, REA Director of Environmental Services Attachments: Appendix A, Air Quality Data KKN:sep H:\C[ient\08 ] 30025TracyFEIR-scwerletter.doc APPENDIX A AIR QUALITY DATA Tracy Sewer Extension Project (Excavation) .... Tracy Total Hours/Day Hours/Day Miles/Day Total CO VOC NOx SOx PM~o Fuel Use Excavator Equipment Type Number 1 Operation4 Operation4 Each Miles/Da¥o lb/da10.2[ Ib/da~t 0.03 lb/da22.27 Ib/dal.8~t ' lb/daY1.39 gal/daY46.40 Wheeled Loader 1 7 7 0 6.24 1.13 13.04 1.13 0.85 28.35 Asphalt Paver 1 3 3 0 1.13 0.16 3.70 0.32 0.16 8.05 Backhoe 1 5 5 0 3.84 0.77 5.63 0.51 0.26 12.79 Concrete Vibrator I 2 2 0 1.77 0.08 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.37 Small Generator Set 0 7 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL 23.18 3.07 44.68 3.83 2.66 95.96 Hours of operation reflect an 8-hour workday with two t'Eteen-minute breaks per day (7.5 hours of operation). Half-hour lunch breaks are not considered part of the workday. Trac)' Sewer Extension Dust Emission tiga6on) ictivi~y P~I,o Activity Level Units lb/day Excavatin~ 75 Cu.Yrds 1.14 Equipment Travel on Unpaved Surfaces 20 Miles/Day 6.93 Pickup Truck Travel on Unpaved Sur[aces 5 Miles/Day 2.54 Storacje Pile Wind Erosion 0.200 Acres 5.98 Soil Droppin~ 300 Cu.Yds/Da 0.54 Loss from Haul Trucks 4 Trips/Day 23,67 Material Loadin~l 200 cu.Yds 3.04 TOTAL 43.85 Tracy Sewer Extension Project (Excavation) Asphaltic Paving Emissions ~Pre-Mitigation) 0.2 AreaEmissionPaved/DaYFactor (Ib/acre-day)(acres) 2.62 Reference: URBEMIS2002 User's Guide, 2003 VOC Emissions lb/da)' 0.52 Trac¥ Sewer Extension Project Excavatior Motor Vehicle Emissions 1Pre-Mitigation) Trips/ Starts/Day Exhaust Fugitive Total Number of Day per Miles/Trip per Total Total CO VOCa NOx PM~o PM~0 PM~o SOx Vehicle Type Vehicles Vehicle :)er Vehicle Vehicle Miles/Da)' Starts/Day lb/day lb/da), lb/da)' Ib/da}~ lb/da;/ Ib/da~, lb/da}, On-site pickup truck 2 10 0.75 20 15 200 8.20 1.17 0.04 0.000 0.04 0.04 0.002 Watering truck 1 4 0.75 2 3 8 0.02 0.00 0.12 0.003 0.04 0.04 0.001 Haul truck, on-sita I 5 0.75 4 0 0.05 0.01 0.16 0.006 0.14 0.15 0.001 Heavy Duty Idling Emissions 15 mis/tn~/da¥) I 5 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 Off-sita commuter 4 4 10 4 160 16 2.18 0.48 0.21 0.000 0.20 0.20 0.002 Haul truck, off-site 1 5 10 2 50 10 0.42 0.12 1.71 0.052 1.9~ 1.98 0.020 TOTAL 10,87 1.79 2.23 0.061 2.36 2.42 0.026 Exhaust Fugitive Total CO VOC NOx SOx PM~o PM~0 PM~0 Source lb/day lb/day lb/da}' lb/day lb/day lb/day lb/day 3n-Site Construction Equipment Exhaust 23.18 3.07 44.68 3.83 2.66 2.66 :3n-Site Motor Vehicles 8.27 1.19 0.31 0.00 0.01 0.01 ~n-Site Fugitive PM10 43.85 43.85 ~,sphaltic Paving 0.52 0.00 ~,rchitectural Coating 0.00 0.00 Total On-Site 31.44 4.78 44.99 3.83 2.67 43.85 46.52 Off-Site Motor Vehicles 2.60 0.60 1.92 0.00 0.05 2.13 2.18 Total Off-Site 2.60 0.60 1.92 O.O0 0.05 2.13 2.18 TOTAL 34.04 5.38 46.90 3.83 2.72 45.98 48.70 Exhaust Fugitive Total CO VOC NOx SOx PM~o PM~0 PM~0 Source lb/da}, lb/day lb/da}' lb/day lb/day lb/da), lb/da}' On-Site Construction Equipment Exhaust 23.18 3.07 44.68 3.83 2.66 2.66 Mitigation Reduction (%) 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 Mitigation Reduction (lb/day) -3.48 -0,46 -6.70 -0.57 Remaining Emissions 19.70 2.61 37.98 3.25 2,26 0.00 2.26 On-Site Motor Vehicles 8.27 1.19 0.31 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 Miti~lation Reduction (%) 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.00 0.00 Miti~lalion Reduction (lb/day) -1.24 -0,18 -0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Remaining Emissions 7.03 1.01 0.26 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 On-Site Fugitive PM10 43.65 43.95 Miti~lation Reduction (%) 0.00 Mitigation Reduction (lb/day) 0.00 0,00 Remainin~l Emissions 43.85 43.85 Asphaltic Paving 0.52 Mitigation Reduction (%) 0,00 vliti~ation Reduction (lb/da},) 0.00 ~emaining Emissions 0.52 total On-Site 26.73 4.14 38.24 3.25 2.27 43.85 46.12 Dff-Site Haul Truck Soil Loss' 0.00 0.00 ~liti~lation Reduction (%) vliti~ation Reduction (lb/day) 0.00 0.00 Remaining Emissions 0.00 0.00 Dff-Site Motor Vehicies 2.60 0.60 1.92 0.00 0.05 2.13 2.18 ~liti~lation Reduction (%) 0,15 0.15 0,15 0.15 0.15 Mitigation Reduction (lb/day) -0.39 -0.09 -0.29 0.00 -0.01 0.00 -0.01 Remaining Emissions 2.21 0.51 1.63 0,00 0.04 2.13 2.18 Total Off-Site 2,21 0.51 1.63 0.00 0.04 2.13 2.18 TOTAL 28.94 4.66 39.87 3.25 2.31 45.98 48.29 ORDINANCE NO. 729 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2003-00409, TO CHANGE THE DISTRICT DESIGNATION FROM VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL (.1-2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW RESIDENTIAL (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND FLOOD CONTROL/RESOURCE CONSERVATION FOR 168.77 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED NORTH OF THE LOWER SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON (SCE) CORRIDOR BETWEEN ETIWANDA AVENUE AND EAST AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF- APN: 0225-083-05, 06, 07, 10, 22, 23, 25, AND 26 AND 0225-084-02. A. RECITALS. 1. Traigh Pacific (the "Applicant") seeks approval of a series of actions related to the annexation of land from unincorporated San Bernardino County into the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the approval of a General Plan Amendment, Etiwanda North Specific Plan Amendment, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT14749, and associated Development Agreement. The actions also include the development 107.28 acres of the 168.77-acre site with 269 single-family housing units (99.26 acres), park area (3.1 acres), equestrian park (2.7 acres), equestrian trail (0.44 acres), and drainage channel (1.77 acres). The development would have a gross density of 1.59 dwelling un[ts per acre, and a net density of 2.5 dwelling units per acre. The remaining 61.49 acres will continue to be used for flood control purposes. The proposed annexation action encompasses a total of 240 acres and includes the development site plus adjacent parcels owned by Southern California Edison and San Bernardino County Flood Control District. These series of actions and approvals are hereinafter defined in this Ordinance as the "Project." 2. The Applicant has submitted the following applications relating to the Project: Annexation DRC2003-01051, General Plan Land Use Amendment DRC2003- 00410, Etiwanda North Specific Plan Amendment DRC2003-00409, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT14749, and Development Agreement DRC2003-00411 (collectively the "Project Applications"). These Project Applications, as well as the appeal of the Planning Commission's approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT14749, constitute the matters involving the Project, which are submitted to the City Council for decision and action. 3. The Applicant's request for Etiwanda North Specific Plan Amendment DRC2003-00409 is for the amendment to the District Designation for 168.77 acres of land from Very Low Residential (.1-2 dwelling units per acre) to Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and Flood Control/Resource Conservation, for that portion of land depicted on Exhibit "A" to this Ordinance. 4. The property to the north of the subject site is designated Flood Control/Utility Corridor and Hillside Residential and is comprised of vacant land, utility corridors, and scattered single-family residences. The property to the west is designated Low Residential (2 to 4 dwelling units per acre) and is the site of the previously approved Rancho Etiwanda Estates. The property to the east is designated Conservation and Very Low Residential (. 1-2 dwelling units per acre) and is the proposed site of Tentative Tract Map 16324 - Henderson Creek. The property to the south is designated Flood Control/Utility Corridor, Conservation, and Very Low Residential and is comprised of a SCE power line corridor, and the Etiwanda Creek Flood Control basins and conservation area. 5. On June 9, 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Project, and after receipt of public testimony, closed the hearing on that date. On June 9, 2004, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 04-78, recommending approval of Efiwanda North Specific Plan Amendment DRC2003-00409 along with other associated applications. 6. On July 21,2004, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Final Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") and the Project, at which time all interested parties were given an opportunity to be heard and to present evidence regarding the Final EIR and the Project, and after the receipt of public testimony, the City Council closed the hearing. 7. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. ORDINANCE. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determine, and ordain as follows: SECTION 1: This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2: Based upon the facts and information contained in the record of this project, the City Council makes the following findings and statements, and takes the following actions, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et. seq.): a. The City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, prepared the Draft Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") for the Project, including certain technical appendices (the "Appendices") to the Draft EIR (State Clearinghouse No. 2003081085). The Draft EIR was circulated for a 45-day public review and comment period from December 5, 2003 through January 28, 2004. Comments were received during that period and written responses were prepared and sent to all persons and entities submitting comments. Those comments and the responses thereto have been included in the Final EIR, as well as the revisions to the Draft EIR. Those documents, together with the Draft EIR and Appendices, comprise the Final EIR. b. The City Council finds that the Final EIR was completed pursuant to CEQA, and the State Guidelines for Implementation of CEQA, 14 California Code of Regulations, Section 15000, et. seq. ("the Guidelines"). By Resolution No. 04-~, the City Council has certified the Final EIR as being in compliance with the requirements of CEQA. ¢. The City Council finds that the Final EIR was presented to the City Council and that the City Council reviewed and considered the information in the Final EIR and has reached its own conclusions with respect to the Project and as to whether and how to approve the various components of the project approvals. d. The City Council finds that the Final EIR represents the independent judgment of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and adequately addresses the impacts of the Project and imposes appropriate mitigation measures for the Project. e. Public Resources Code Section 21081 provides that no public agency shall approve or carry out a project for which an environmental impact report has been completed which identifies one or more significant environmental effects unless the public agency makes one or more of the following findings with respect to each significant effect: i) Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the project, which mitigate or avoid the significant environmental effects thereof as identified in the completed environmental impact report. ii) Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and such changes have been adopted by such agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency. iii) Specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the environmental impact report. f. The City Council finds, based upon the Final EIR, public comments, public agency comments, and the entire record before it, that the Project may create significant impacts in the areas Earth Resources, Water Resources, Transportation/Circulation, Air Quality, Bioiogical Resources, Hazards, Noise, Public Services, Utilities, Aesthetics, and Cultural Resources. However, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the Project, which will mitigate and in some cases, avoid the significant impacts. The specific changes and alterations required, and a brief explanation of the rationale for the findings with regard to each impact, are contained in the "CEQA Findings" for the Project (Exhibit "F" to the July 21,2004 City Council Staff Report) and are incorporated herein by reference. In addition to the rationale and explanation contained in the "CEQA Findings," the City Council makes the following additional findings regarding the impacts of the Project on the resources and services listed in this paragraph: i) Earth Resources. The Final EIR finds that development of the Project would expose people and structures to risks associated with seismic ground shaking produced by numerous regional faults. Additionally, development of the project would require removal of vegetation to prepare for grading; this would create a short-term increased potential for topsoil erosion. Potential erosion in the long-term would result from increased surface runoff rates due to road paving and construction of impermeable structures. Mitigation measures are imposed which require a detailed geologic and geotechnical investigation for each lot prior to the grading of the Project site. Specifically, the developer must: demonstrate that each lot is buildable and complies with recommendations and specifications found in the geotechnical investigation report included in Appendix C of the Final EIR (Mitigation Measure 3-1); identify potential geologic and soil limitations and recommend appropriate engineering and design measures to adequately protect structures and inhabitants (Mitigation Measure 3-2); and identifl/these construction measures on applicable grading plans, and implement them to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Further, mitigation measures are imposed on the project that require preparation and approval of a Dust Control Plan and a Landscape and Irrigation Plan to reduce the likelihood of erosion (Mitigation Measures 3-4 and 3-5). Based on these mitigation measures, and the additional ones contained in the Final EIR, the City Council finds that the effects of seismic shaking on persons and structures and the possibility of erosion will be mitigated to a level of less than significant. ii) Water Resources. The Final EIR identifies that conversion of the Project site to urban uses would increase the amount of sediment, suspended debris, landscape maintenance or associated chemicals (e.g., fertilizers, herbicides, etc.), and materials related to automotive wear (e.g., tire rubber, oil, antifreeze, etc.) that would reach the local drainage system due to run-off caused by grading or by being washed off streets during storm events or street-sweeping activities. Mitigation measures imposed on the applicant would require the Project developer to apply for and receive a National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit and, if necessary, to obtain Clean Water Act Section 401 and 404 permits (for water quality certification for dredge and fill operations); additionally, the developer will be required to implement all applicable Best Management Practices (BMPs) to prevent construction of the Project from polluting surface and ground waters. The City Council finds that implementation of this mitigation measure will mitigate impacts on water quality to a level of less than insignificant. Additionally, the Final EIR identifies that the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has identified the Project site as within a flood zone designated "Flood Zone D." Mitigation measures will require the developer to install a revetment along the East Etiwanda Channel adjacent to the Project site, and implement on- and off-site drainage system improvements outlined in the Project Drainage Study (Appendix D of the draft EIR). The City Council finds that the revetment and drainage improvements will reduce flood impacts associated with the Project to a level of less than significant. iii) Transportation and Circulation. The Final EIR indicates that the proposed Project would increase vehicle trips and impact the level of service along arterial streets and intersections; specifically, the Project is anticipated to generate a total of 2,956 daily vehicle trips at build-out. Further, it is assumed that at build-out 68 percent of the Project traffic would enter/exit the site along Etiwanda Avenue, while 32 percent would use East Avenue; this distribution would cause some roads to be more intensely affected than others. Additionally, the Final EIR found that the level of service at the intersection of Etiwanda and Highland Avenues could be reduced to a "D" level during the morning peak hour at full build-out. Mitigation Measures are imposed to require the developer to contribute a fair share to the traffic signal mitigation program of the County of San Bernardino and/or the City of Rancho Cucamonga to help fund the construction of traffic signals at the intersections of: Day Creek Boulevard/Banyan Avenue; Day Creek Boulevard/SR-210 West-bound ramp; Day Creek Boulevard/SR 210 East-bound ramp; Etiwanda Avenue/Banyan Avenue; Etiwanda Avenue/VVilson Avenue; and East Avenue/Banyan Avenue. Further, the developerwill be required to pay a "fair share" contribution towards off-site impacts to linked roadways and intersections as outlined in the Project traffic report; this "fair share" amount is approximately $63,818 as of the date of the traffic study. The City Council finds that based on these mitigation measures, traffic at the study intersections will be reduced to operate at a level of service of D or better (with all but one intersection operating at level of service C or better) and that the impacts of the Project on Traffic and Circulation will be mitigated to a level of less than significant. iv) Air Quality. The Final EIR identifies that the Project may create significant and unavoidable impacts on Air Quality. Specifically, the Final EIR identifies that emissions from construction-related activities are likely to exceed the threshold of significance specified by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). These impacts are short-term and can cause nuisance impacts to adjacent land uses in the local area by way of fugitive dust produced by grading of the site. In addition, construction-related emissions, particularly from architectural coatings (painting) and off-road diesel equipment, are anticipated to produce significant levels of reactive organic compounds (ROC) and nitrogen oxides (NO×) that would exceed SCAQMD thresholds of significance and result in significant short-term air pollution impacts. Comprehensive mitigation measures (Mitigation Measures 6-1 - 6-10) are imposed on the Project which will require various dust control measures, emission control measures, and off-site actions. Included in those measures are requirements to ensure that all construction equipment is properly serviced and maintained and that trucks are not left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes), reestablishment of ground cover through seeding and watering, phased grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended pedods of time, suspension of grading operations during periods of high wind (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph), and regular washing and sweeping of the site. The Final EIR also indicates that the Project would produce long-term impacts on Air Quality as a result of the additional external vehicle trips that will be generated, and their attendant production of NOx and PM~0 in excess of SCAQMD standards. Further, secondary impact potential would derive from energy consumption by on-site residential heaters, stoves, water heaters, and similar consumptive appliances. Mitigation measures imposed on the Project to reduce long-term impacts include requiring the developer to demonstrate that all residential structures have incorporated high- efficiency/Iow-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters (Mitigation Measure 6-11), and that all residential structures have incorporated thermal pane windows and weather-stripping (Mitigation Measure 6-12). Further, the developer will be required to make a fair share contribution to a "park and ride" facility along the 1-15 or 1-10 freeways, as well as construct a bus stop/shelter at the trailhead park, if directed by OmniTrans. The City Council finds that with the implementation of the recommended mitigation measures directed at both short- and long-term impacts, emissions will be reduced and the Project's contribution to regional emission of criterial pollutants will be minimized. However, the City Council finds that despite the imposition of all of these comprehensive mitigation requirements, the Project will produce significant short- and long-term impacts on Air Quality due to emissions, and that these impacts will remain significant after mitigation. v) Biolo,qical Resources. The Final EIR indicates that, priorto the Grand Prix fire in October 2003, the Project site contained approximately 109 acres of sage scrub (including white sage), along with California buckwheat, California filago, valley lessingia, popcorn flower, and common phacelia; the Project will eliminate this vegetation through development of the area. Further, the Project will impact sensitive plant species present on the site (as determined before the 2003 wildfire) including Plummer's mariposa lily, Pious daisy, and four separate types of spineflowers (Ramona, prostrate, California, and Parry's). Development of the site will also impact wildlife corridors and will remove habitat that suppods a number of sensitive species that were either observed onsite or have a moderate to high potential to occur onsite, including the sharp-shinned hawk, Southern California rufous-crowned sparrow, red-shouldered hawk, white-tailed kite, northern harrier, Cooper's hawk, San Diego horned lizard, and orange-throated whiptail. The Final EIR indicated that the California gnatcatcher (a federally listed threatened species) has not been observed on-site and has a Iow probability of occurring on the site due to the type of vegetation present. Also, the Final EIR found that while a portion of the Project site (the Etiwanda Creek channel) is within the historical range fo the endangered San Bemardino Kangaroo Rat (SBKR), since the creek channel is not proposed for development, the Project will not cause direct impacts to the SBKR. The Final EIR further found that development of the site will remove 0.48 acres of land in four small drainages that are under Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) jurisdiction, but that none of these areas is considered a wetland. The Final EIR found that the Project is not consistent with the goals of the North Etiwanda Open Space and Habitat Preservation Program (NEOSHPP) since it does not include any on-site preservation of open space lands. Mitigation measures have been imposed on the project to require the Project developer to acquire and convey to the County approximately 164 acres of land as off-site mitigation land. This 164-acre area is intended to accomplish a 1:5 to 1 ratio to mitigate for the loss of the approximately 109 acres of sage scrub and to mitigate the potential loss of habitat for sensitive plants and animal species. The City finds that the recommended mitigation measures will help reduce potentially significant impacts regarding the loss of habitat, but that the impacts will remain significant after mitigation. vi) Hazards.. The Final EIR identifies that the Project would expose people and structures to potential hazards due to the possibility of hazardous materials spills on nearby state highways, and due to the minor use of chemicals and other materials typical of suburban uses. Additionally, the Project would expose more people and structures to potential wildfire hazards, and would expose more people to potentially dangerous wildlife/human encounters. Mitigation measures imposed will require submission of a plan detailing proper clean-up efforts for any hazardous or toxic substance that is discovered or released during construction (Mitigation Measure 9-1); development of fuel modification zones, and the requirement of"firewise" landscaping and the use of fire- resistant building materials to reduce fire hazards (Mitigation Measures 9-2 - 9-4); and the posting of signs warning of the potential risk of wildlife/human interactions on the site (Mitigation Measure 9-8). The City Council finds that after implementation of these measures, potentially significant impacts relating to Hazards will be reduced to a level of less than significant. vii) Noise. The Final EIR identifies the likelihood of short-term impacts on ambient noise levels during construction of the Project. The primary source of construction noise is heavy equipment associated with construction activities; earth- moving equipment is anticipated to create noise up to 90-dB. A mitigation measure has been imposed that will require the construction contractors to adhere to the City's Development Code for hours of construction activity - 6:30 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday, with no construction to take place on Sundays or holidays (Mitigation Measure 10-2). Based on this mitigation measure, the City Council finds that the short term noise impacts from the Project will be reduced to less than significant levels. The Final EIR also identified that noise levels would increase in the long-term due to additional motor vehicle noise and from general human activity. In the opening year (2005), noise levels at fifty feet from the centerline of area roadways would range from a Iow of 58.1 CNEL along Wilson Avenue east of Etiwanda Avenue to a high of 78.3 CNEL along Highland Avenue east of Etiwanda Avenue. A mitigation measure will be imposed to require the developer to document that exterior residential areas will have exterior noise levels of less than 65 dB CNEL (Mitigation Measure 10-5), and that interior living area noise levels are less than 45 dB CNEL (Mitigation Measure 10-6). Further, the developer will be required to incorporate site designs and measures to help reduce proposed noise levels over the long-term. The City Council finds that based on these mitigation measures, the potential noise impacts of the Project on current and future residents will be mitigated to a level of less than significant. viii) .Public Services. The Final EIR identifies that due to population increases associated with the Project, the proposed Project would incrementally increase the need for public services in the areas of fire protection, police protection, schools, libraries, medical services, and roads. A mitigation measure is imposed to require the developer to pay all legally established public service fees, including police, fire, schools, parks, and library fees (Mitigation Measure 11- 1). Additionally, in order to reduce the number of fire incidents requiring response by the City's Fire Department, the project developer would be required to obtain approval from the Fire Department with regard to adequate fire flow and installation of acceptable fire-resistant structural materials in project buildings (Mitigation Measure 11-3). Additionally, the developer will be required to post a bond in an amount sufficient to ensure installation and maintenance of public and private reads, and drainage facilities necessary for each phase of the project (Mitigation Measure 11-5). The City Council finds that the imposition and implementation of these mitigation measures will mitigate the Project's impacts on Public Services to a level of less than significant. ix) Utilities. The Final EIR identifies that the Project would create potentially significant impacts as a result of new residential water requirements of approximately 602,819 gallons of water per day; this water would be provided from an existing two million gallon water reservoir via an existing water main, however, as growth continues in the Project area, additional offsite water storage facilities would be required. Further, the Final EIR indicates that based on an estimate of 270 gallons of wastewater per unit per day being produced, the Project would require construction of a sewer main to transport the wastewater to an existing sewage treatment plant. Additionally, the Project would generate the need for increased electricity, natural gas, and telephone and television cables, and would increase the amount of solid waste produced. A mitigation measure imposed requires the contribution of funds for sewer service (Mitigation Measure 12-1). Further mitigation measures require submission of development plans to Southern California Edison, the Gas Company, and Verizon in order to facilitate engineering design and construction of improvements necessary to provide electrical, natural gas, and telephone service to the Project; these companies must also provide "will-serve" letters in order for building permits to issue. The City Council finds that imposition of these mitigation measures will reduce the impacts of the Project on Utilities to a level of less than significant. x) Aesthetics. The Final EIR identifies that the Project may create significant and unavoidable impacts on Aesthetics. In the short-term, the landscape would be altered by grading and clearing, and views of the Project site would include the heavy construction equipment and machinery used to prepare the Project site for construction of new homes. Long-term impacts would occur due to a fundamental change in the visual and aesthetic character of the area, and would transform the existing natural terrain into a developed and planned community. Additionally, the presence of homes would mean more lighting at night, as well as increased glare due to additional windows in the community. Mitigation measures will require that outdoor lighting comply with the requirements of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan design guidelines and the City's General Plan (Mitigation Measure 13-1), and that a detailed landscaping and wall treatment plan be prepared (Mitigation Measure 13-5). Even with the imposition and implementation of these and other mitigation measures, the City Council finds that the impact of the Project on Aesthetics will remain significant after mitigation. xi) Cultural Resources. The Final EIR identifies that while the existence of paleontological resources is unlikely on the Project site, such resources may be discovered during construction of the Project. Also, one historic archeological site was previously recorded on the property, CA-SBR- 3131H. This prior survey found what appeared to be the remains of a construction camp used by the Etiwanda Water Company in the 1880s; the structure consisted of rock walls, hand-forged metal barrel hoops and nails, barbed wire, and glass fragments. Mitigation measures imposed require that a qualified paleontologist conduct a preconstruction field survey of the Project site and submit a report of findings and specific recommendations for further mitigation measures (Mitigation Measure 14-1). Should any prehistoric archaeological resources be found before or during grading, a qualified archaeologist would be retained to monitor construction activities, and take appropria{e measures to protect or preserve the resources. The City Council finds that with the implementation of these mitigation measures, the Project will have a less than significant impact on paleontological, archaeological, and historical resources. xii) Cumulative Impacts -Air Quality~ Biolo.qical Resources, and Aesthetics. The Final EIR provides that this Project, together with the construction of other development projects in the vicinity, would create cumulative shod-term impacts to air qualityduring construction. This Preject would also create a significant cumulative impact to regional air quality due to additional vehicle emissions adding incremental pollutants within the South Coast Air Basin. With respect to biological resources, the Final EIR concluded that the Project would contribute to cumulatively considerable biological impacts with loss of habitat and restriction of wildlife movement in the fan area due to encroachment of human structures and activities. With respect to aesthetics, the proposed project will contribute incrementally to cumulatively considerable aesthetic impacts related to the visual character of the area going from largely vacant, rural terrain to Iow density suburban development g. The City Council finds, based on the Final EIR, that after implementation of the proposed mitigation measures, the following impacts associated with the proposed Project would remain significant: air quality (short-term impacts, and shod and long-term cumulative impacts), biological resources related to the loss of habitat, and aesthetics related to short-term views (i.e. construction activities and dust) and long-term views related to transforming the existing natural terrain into a residential community h. The Final EIR describes a range of alternatives to the Project that might fulfill basic objectives of the Project. These alternatives include the required "No Project-No Development" alternative, and the "Rural Density Alterative," development under the existing land use designation. Other alternatives that were considered and rejected included the alternative location alternative and the alternative land use alternative. As set forth below, the alternatives identified in the Final EIR are not feasible because they would not achieve the basic objectives of the Project or would do so only to a much smaller degree and, therefore, leave unaddressed the significant economic, infrastructure, and General Plan goals that the Project is intended to accomplish, and are thus infeasible due to social and economic considerations, and/or they are infeasible because they would not eliminate the adverse environmental impacts of the proposed Project. Accordingly, each of the alternatives is infeasible. In making this finding, the City Council determines as follows: i) The objectives of the Project are: a) To be consistent with, and implement, the established policies and goals of the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, Etiwanda North Specific Plan, City Development Code, and all other City development guidelines; b) Annexation of 240 acres including the 168.77-acre Project site and adjacent utility easements and corridors into the City of Rancho Cucamonga; c) To Integrate the Project with the character of the surrounding neighborhoods and establish a development that results in logical, coordinated growth; d) To establish a Project-wide circulation system that meets regional and local transportation needs and accommodates both vehicles and pedestrians; e) To provide a system of public/community facilities, including trails, open space areas, and landscaping to support the residents of the Project and surrounding area in an efficient and timely manner; f) To provide backbone public infrastructure (i.e., reads, utilities) to serve Project residents and the surrounding community; g) To minimize impacts to, and generate revenues in excess of costs for various public service agencies; and h) To provide quality housing opportunities compatible with existing and planned development that responds to market demands. ii) Under the "No Project-No Development Alternative" the project site would remain vacant which would avoid all significant project specific impacts, although cumulative impacts including traffic, noise, and air quality would eventually occur, but not to the same degree as Jf the proposed Project were built. This alternative would eliminate essentially all of the adverse impacts of the proposed Project and is, therefore, an environmentally superior alternative. This alternative does not meet the Project's basic objectives of developing a residential project consistent with the General Plan land use designation for the site. iii) Under the "No Project - Open Space Alternative" the site would remain vacant but be acquired, fenced, and maintained for open space and biological habitat as part of the NEOSHPP plan. This alternative would avoid all the significant impacts of developing the property, however, cumulative impacts including traffic, noise, and air quality, will eventually occur regardless of whether the site is developed or preserved, although perhaps not to the same degree as with the proposed Project. This is an environmentally superior alternative but does not meet the Project's basic objectives, and indeed all other objectives, of developing a project consistent with the General Plan land use designation for the site. iv) Under the "Reduced Intensity Alternative" almost all of the significant or potentially significant impacts associated with the proposed project would be eliminated. The remaining significant impact (i.e., construction emissions) could probably not be eliminated or significantly reduced by the implementation of any feasible alternative or mitigation measures at this time, unless the project were to support all custom lots of one acre or more where only building pads are graded when needed. However, the Project fiscal report indicates that fewer, larger residential lots/units would not generate sufficient public revenues to offset costs to provide services. While this alternative is environmentallysuperior to the proposed Project, it does not meet the Project's economic objectives of developing a residential project that has a positive costJbenefit ratio for the City and generates a reasonable return on investment. Also, since this alternative does not fully implement the City's goal of providing adequate park facilities for City residents. v) The "Modified Site Plan Alternative" would create a 300-foot wide buffer along the west bank of the East Etiwanda Creek to better buffer wildlife movement and create more open space. It would cluster the residential development in the southwestern portion of the site and would have 200 units with a minimum lot size of 6,000 square feet and a height limit of one story. It would eliminate the significant impacts of the proposed project-related long-term air quality (NOx and ROG emissions). However, potentially significant impacts related to short-term air pollutant emissions (ROG) and loss of biological resources would remain. Also, this alternative does not meet the Project's economic objectives of developing a residential project that has a positive cost/benefit ratio for the City and generates a reasonable return on investment. This alternative is marginally superior to the proposed Project in terms of environmental impacts, but it does not meet the Project objectives. vi) The "Rural Density Alterative" would development the site under the City's currently designated of Very Low density residential (VL) which allows a maximum of 2 units per acre of developable land with minimum 20,000 square foot lots. This alternative would locate approximately 75 units on 37 acres in the southern portion of the site, while the remaining 70 acres would be set aside as open space and biological habitat. This alternative would eliminate the significant impacts of the proposed Project related to biological resources related to loss of alluvial fan habitat and long-term air quality from NOx and ROG emissions. This alternative still has significant impacts related to short-term air pollutant emissions (ROG) and does not provide the benefits of two parks. Also, this alternative does not meet the Project's economic objectives of developing a residential project that has a positive cost/benefit ratio for the City and generates a reasonable return on investment. As such, it does not meet the Project's goals. This alternative is environmentally superior to the proposed Project, but it does not meet the Project objectives. i. Mitigation measures described in the Mitigation Monitoring Program will avoid or substantially lessen the potentially significant environmental effects of the Project. Further, the environmental, physical, social, economic and other benefits of the Project, as set forth in this section and in the "CEQA Findings" for the Project (Exhibit "F" to the July 21, 2004 City Council Staff Report), which is incorporated herein by this reference, outweigh any unavoidable, significant, adverse impacts that may occur as a result of the Project, including short- term impacts on air quality from construction-related emissions and cumulative impacts to air quality related to vehicle emissions; impacts to biological resources related to removal of habitat; and shod-term impacts to aesthetics (i.e. construction dust obscuring views) and long-term impacts to aesthetics (changes to the natural terrain). Therefore, due to overriding benefits of the Project and because the alternatives identified in the Final EIR are not feasible, as discussed in paragraph j above, the City Council hereby finds that any unavoidable impacts of the Project, including the mitigated but unavoidable impacts to short-term and long-term impacts on air quality and aesthetics, and project related and cumulative impacts to biological resources, are acceptable based on the findings contained herein and in the "CEQA Findings" for the Project. This determination shall constitute a statement of overriding considerations within the meaning of CEQA and is bas.ed on any one of the following environmental and other benefits of the Project identified in the Final EIR and the record of the City Council's proceedings: i) Provision for the use of land consistent with the established policies and goals of the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, Ftiwanda North Specific Ptan, City Development Code, and all other City Development guidelines; ii) Annexation of 240 acres including the 168.77-acre Project site and adjacent utility easements and corridors into the City of Rancho Cucamonga; iii) Integration of the Project with the character of the surrounding neighborhoods and establishment of a development that results in logical, coordinated growth; iv) Establishmentofa Project-wide circulation system that meets regional and local transportation needs and accommodates both vehicles and pedestrians; v) Provision of a system of public/community facilities, including trails, open space areas, and landscaping to support the residents of the Project and surrounding area in an efficient and timely manner; vi) Provision of backbone public infrastructure (i.e., roads, utilities) to serve Project residents and the surrounding community; vii) Minimization of impacts to, and generation of revenues in excess of costs for, various public service agencies; viii) Provision of quality housing opportunities compatible with existing and planned development that responds to market demands; ix) The addition of housing units in accomplishment of the City's Housing Element Goals and fulfillment of regional housing needs; x) City control over the developing lands on the City's perimeter; and xi) Advancement of the regional trail system by the links to be completed by the Project. j. The mitigation measures in the Final EIR that correspond to the environmental impacts which may result from the Project are hereby adopted and made a condition of approval of, or incorporated into, the Project. The City Council also hereby adopts the "Mitigation Monitoring Plan" attached as Exhibit"G" to the June 16, 2004 City Council Staff Report for this Project. The Mitigation Monitoring Plan will be used to monitor compliance with the mitigation measures and conditions that have been adopted or made a condition of Project approval as set forth in this Section of this Ordinance and in the Mitigation Monitoring Plan. k. Pursuant to provisions of the California Public Resources Code Section 21089(b), the findings contained in this Ordinance shall not be operative, vested or final until all required filing fees assessed pursuant to California Fish and Game Code Section 711.4, together with any required handling charges, are paid to the County Clerk of the County of San Bernardino. SECTION 3.: Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing on July 21, 2004, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The proposed change in density of residential development allowed on the Project site is consistent with neighboring properties, and is consistent with General Plan Policy 2.5.2.2 which expresses an intention to apply the Low Density designation to portions of Etiwanda and into the City's Sphere of Influence where the level of services, including roads, shopping and recreational opportunities, are not sufficient to justify higher densities. b. The proposed change in land use designation will promote housing opportunities and help achieve the City's regional share of housing needs. e. The amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties because the land uses and intensities of residential uses allowed are consistent and compatible with the type of housing and open space conservation areas abutting the proposed development. d. The proposed change in designations are also consistent with the provisions of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan which encourages retention of open space and the extension of the image of Old Etiwanda into this area, with relatively large lots and oppor[unities for an equestrian lifestyle. SECTION 4: Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Sections 1, 2 and 3 above, this Council hereby approves Etiwanda North Specific Plan Amendment DRC2003-00409 to establish a Low Residential District on that portion of land described in this Ordinance and depicted on Exhibit "A" to this Ordinance. SECTION 5: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Ordinance is, for any reason, deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, or preempted by legislative enactment, such decision or legislation shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or words thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, clauses, phrases, or words might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional or preempted by subsequent legislation. SECTION 6: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. 1000 0 1000 2000 Feet ~-~-~PROPOSEDLOW ~PROPOSED RESOURCE CONSERVATION ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT EXHIBIT "A" DRC2003-00409 ORDINANCE NO. 730 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2003-004'1'1, A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETVVEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND TRAIGH PACIFIC, FOR THE PURPOSE OF DEVELOPING AN APPROXIMATE 168.77 ACRE SITE WITH UP TO 269 RESIDENTIAL LOTS, FOR PROPERTIES GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON (SCE) CORRIDOR BETWEEN ETIWANDA AVENUE AND EAST AVENUE - APN: 0225-083-05, 06, 07 10, 22, 23, 25, AND 26 AND 0225-084-02. A. RECITALS. 1. California Government Code Section 65864 now provides, in pertinent part, as follows: "The Legislature finds and declares that: a. The lack of certainty in the approval of development projects can result in a waste of resources, escalate the cost of housing and other developments to the consumer, and discourage investment in the commitment to comprehensive planning, which would make maximum efficient utilization of resources at the least economic cost to the public; and b. Assurance to the applicant for a development project that upon approval of the project, the applicant may proceed with the project in accordance with existing policies, rules and regulations, and subject to conditions of approval, will strengthen the public planning process, encourage private participation in comprehensive planning, and reduce the economic costs of development." 2. California Government Code Section 65865 provides, in pertinent part, as follows: "Any city...may enter into a Development Agreement with any person having a legal or equitable interest in real property for the development of such property as provided in this article..." 3. California Government Code Section 65865.2 provides, in part, as follows: "A Development Agreement shall specify the duration of the Agreement, the permitted uses of the property, the density of intensity of use, the maximum height and size of proposed buildings, and provisions for reservation or dedication of land for public purposes. The Development Agreement may include conditions, terms, restrictions, and requirements for subsequent discretionary actions, provided that such conditions, terms, restrictions, and requirements for discretionary actions shall not prevent development of the land for the uses and to the density of intensity of development of the land for the uses and to the density of intensity of development set forth in the Agreement..." 4. "Attached to this Ordinance, marked as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference is proposed Development Agreement DRC2003-00411, concerning that property generally located north of the SCE corridor between Etiwanda Avenue and East Avenue, and legally described in the attached Development Agreement. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, the Development Agreement Attached hereto as Exhibit "A" is referred to as the "Development Agreement." 5. On June 9, 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a duly noticed public hearing concerning the Development Agreement and concluded said hearing on that date and recommended approval through adoption of its Resolution No. 04-**. 6. On June 16, 2004, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing concerning the Development Agreement. 7. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. ORDINANCE, NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determine, and ordain as follows: SECTION 1: This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2: Prior to the adoption of this Ordinance, this Council has reviewed the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) as certified by the City of Rancho Cucamonga as legally sufficient for the Henderson Creek Properties development project. SECTION 3: Based upon substantial evidence presented during the above- referenced public hearing on June 9, 2004, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The location, design, and proposed uses set forth in this Development Agreement are compatible with the character of existing development in the vicinity. b. This Development Agreement shall not become effective until General Plan Amendment DRC2003-00410, and Etiwanda North Specific Plan Amendment DRC2003-00409 have been reviewed and approved by the City Council. SECTION 4: It is Expressly found that the public necessity, general welfare, and good zoning practice require the approval of the Development Agreement. SECTION 5: This Council hereby approves Development Agreement DRC2003- 00411, attached hereto as Exhibit "A." SECTION 6: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2003-00411 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND TRAIGH PACIFIC PROPERTIES (dba TRACY DEVELOPMENT) CONCERNING THE PROPOSED TENTATIVE TRACT 14749 This Agreement (the "Development Agreement") is made and entered into this 21st day of July, 2004, by and between Traiqh Pacific Properties (dba Tracy Development) and Parkwest Landscape, California corporations; and San Bernardino Flood Control District, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation (the "CITY") pursuant to the authority of Section 65864 through 65869.5 of the California Government Code. Traiqh Pacific Properties, Parkwest Landscape, and San Bernardino Flood Control District, and its successors and assigns, if any, are referred to collectively hereinafter as the "Property Owner". The CITY and Traiqh Pacific Properties et. al. are collectively referred to herein as the "Parties". _ RECITALS: A. To provide more certainty in the approval of development projects, to encourage private participation in comprehensive planning, and to reduce the economic risk of development, the Legislature of the State of Califo(nia has adopted Sections 65864, et seq. of the California Government Code, thus authorizing the CITY to enter into binding development agreements with persons having legal or equitable interests in real property, in order to establish development rights with respect thereto. B. Section 65865(b) of the California Government Code authorizes the CiTY to enter into a binding development agreement with respect to real property which is in unincorporated territory but also within the CITY's sphere of influence, provided that the effectiveness of the development agreement is conditioned upon the annexation of such real property to the CITY within the period of time for annexation as specified in the Development Agreement. C. Property Owner owns fee title to approximately 168.8-acres of real property located entirely within the County of San Bemardino (the "County") and more particularly described in Exhibit "A" and depicted on Exhibit "B" attached hereto (the "Project Site"). D. - On April 24, 2003 the City received an application for Tentative Tract Map (SUBTT14749), a General Plan Amendment (DRC2003-00410), an Etiwanda North Specific Plan Amendment (DRC2003-00409), along with this Development Agreement (DRC2003-00411) and a request for Annexation (DRC2003-01051) of the Proposed Project. An Environmental Impact Report has been prepared to address the potential environment impacts of the proposed project and all discretionary actions anticipated by the CITY and the Local Agency Formation Commission. E. As set forth in Ordinance No. __ adopted by the City Council on __ (the "Enacting Ordinance"), the execution of this Development Agreement and performance of and compliance with the terms and conditions set forth herein by the Development Agreement 1 Traigh Pacific Properties Parties hereto: (i) is in the best interest of the CITY; (ii) will promote the public convenience, general welfare, and good land use practices in the CITY; (iii) will promote preservation of land values; (iv) will encourage the development of the Project by providing a level of certainty to the Property Owner; and (v) will provide for orderly growth and development of the CITY consistent with the CITY's General Plan. AGREEMENT: NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above recitals, and the mutual promises and covenants of the Parties, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which us hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows: Section 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS A. Effectiveness of Development Aqreement Notwithstanding the effective date of the Enacting Ordinance, this Development Agreement shall only become effective, and the rights and obligations of the Parties shall only arise, upon the date that the last of the following have occurred: 1. The project site has been annexed to the CITY and said annexation is final as to any and all administrative actions, and is not subject to judicial challenge; and 2. The Project and the Final EIR have been approved by the CITY and all (~ntitlements have been issued for completion by Property Owner. B. Term The term of this Development Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date and shall extend for a period of 10 years thereafter, unless this Development Agreement is terminated, modified or extended ,by circumstances set forth in this Development Agreement, including, without limitation, the extensions provided below and any extE~nsions attributable to "force majeure" circumstances described in Section 2.D.4 hereof or by mutual written consent of the Parties. Following the expiration of the Term, this Development Agreement shall be deemed terminated and of no further force and effect; provided, however, that such termination shall not affect any right or duty arising from the project entitlements granted prior to, concurrently with, or subsequent to the approval of this Development Agreement an~ the structures that are developed in accordance with this Development Agreement and the use of those structures shall continue to be governed by this Development Agreement for purposes of ensuring, for land use purposes, that those structures continue to be legal conforming structures and that those uses continue to be legal conforming uses. C.. Assi,qnment Subject to the terms of this Development Agreement, Property Owner shall have the right to convey, assign, sell, lease, sublease, encumber, hypothecate or otherwise transfer (for purposes of this Development Agreement, 'q'ransfer") the Project Site, in whole or in part, to any person, partnership, joint venture, firm or corporation or other Development Agreement 2 Traigh Pacific Properties l~'~ entity at any time during the term of this Development Agreement, and to the extent of each such Transfer, the transferor shall be relieved of its legal duty to perform such obligations under this Development Agreement at the time of the Transfer, except to the extent Property Owner is in default, as defined in Section 3.C hereof, of any of the terms of this Development Agreement when the Transfer occurs. If all or a portion of the Project Site is Transferred and there is noncompliance by the transferee owner with respect to any term and condition of this Development Agreement, or by the transferor with respect to any portion of the Project Site not sold or Transferred, such noncompliance shall be deemed a breach of this Agreement by that transferee or transferor, as applicable, but shall not be deemed to be a breach hereunder against other persons then owning or holding any interest in any portion of the Project Site and not themselves in breach under this Development Agreement. Any alleged breach shall be governed by the provisions of Section 3.C hereof. in no event shall the reservation or dedication of a portion of the Project Site to a public agency cause a transfer of duties and obligations unless specifically stated to be the case in this Development Agreement, any of the exhibits attached to this Development Agreement, the instrument of conveyance used for such reservation or dedication, or other form of agreement with such public agency. Concurrently, with any such sale, transfer or assignment, or within ten business days thereafter, the Property Owner shall notify the CITY, in writing, of such sale, transfer or assignment and shall provide the CITY with an executed agreement, in a form reasonably acceptable to the CITY, by the purchaser, transferee or assignee and providing therein that the purchaser, transferee or assignee expressly and unconditionally assumes all the duties and obligations of the Property Owner under this agreement. D. Amendment of Aqreement This Development Agreement may be amended from time to time by mutual consent of the Parties in accordance with the provisions of Government Code Sections 65867 and 65868. Notwithstanding anything stated to the contrary in this Development Agreement, the parties may enter into one or more implementing agreements, as set forth below, to clarify the intended application or interpretation of this Development Agreement, without amending this Development Agreement. Property Owner and the CITY acknowledge that the provisions of this Development Agreement require a close degree of cooperation between Property Owner and the CITY and that, in the course of the development of the Project Site, it may be necessary to supplement this Development Agreement to address the details of the Parties' respective performance and obligations, and to otherwise effectuate the purposes of this Development Agreement and the intent of the Parties. If and when, from time to time, the Parties find that it is necessary or appropriate to clarify the application or interpretation of this Development Agreement, the Padies may do so through one or more implementing agreements (the "Implementing Agreement"), which shall be executed by the City Planner and by an authorized representative of Property Owner. After execution, each Implementing Agreement shall be attached as an addendum and become a part of this Development Agreement, and may be further changed or supplemented from time to time as necessary. Such implementing Development Agreement 3 Traigh Pacific Properties Agreement shall not require the approval of the City Council of the CITY and shall only be executed by the City Planner (on Behalf of the CITY), if the City Planner has made a reasonable determination that such implementing agreements are not materially inconsistent with this Development Agreement, and applicable ordinances, rules, regulations and official policies of the CITY in effect at the time of execution of this Development Agreement. Any changes to this Development Agreement which would impose additional obligations on the CITY beyond those which would be deemed to arise under a reasonable interpretation of this Development Agreement, or which would purport to change land use designations applicable to the Project Site under the applicable Project Entitlements, shall be considered "material" and shall require amendment of this Agreement in accordance with the provisions of California Government Code Sections 65867 and 65868. Section 2. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROJECT A. Land Use and Project Entitlements The Project Entitlements are depicted on the Tentative Tract Map, Conceptual Grading Plan, and Conceptual Landscape Plan, attached hereto as Exhibits lA- 1C. Project Entitlements refers to the following material related to the approval of the Development Agreement (DRC2003-00411) and the Tentative Tract Map (SUB'F¥14749): all plans that constitute the approved project, all Planning Commission and City Council Resolutions of Approval including the associated conditions of approval, and all mitigation measures included in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan and the Environmental impact Report. The Parties acknowledge that, without being obligated to do so, Property Owner plans to develop the Project Site in substantial conformity with the Project Entitlements as approved by this Development Agreement. During the Term of this agreement, the permitted uses for the Project, or any portion thereof, the density and intensity of use, zoning, maximum height and size of proposed buildings, building and yard setback requirements, provisions for the reservation or dedication of land, design and performance standards and other terms and conditions of development of the Project constitute the Entitlements as approved by this Development Agreement. The specific terms of this Development Agreement shall supercede and be controlling over any conflict and/or inconsistency with the Project Entitlements. The Parties acknowledge and agree that the total number of lots in the approved tract totals 269 lots, and that lots may be shifted between phased tracts without increasing the overall number of lots and be in substantial conformity with the Project Entitlements as approved by this Development Agreement. The CITY Planner shall exercise his reasonable discretion to review transfers of lots between tracts and make the determination of substantial compliance. Other certain specific modifications of the Project Entitlements to which the Parties agree are set forth below. All Exhibits attached hereto constitute material provisions of the Development Agreement, and are incorporated herein. B. Rules and Re.qulations Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65856 and except as otherwise explicitly provided in this Development Agreement, (1) the ordinance, rules and Develot~ment Agreement 4 Traigh Pacific Properties l~,¢ regulations and official policies governing permitted uses of the Project Site, the density and intensity of such uses, and the design, improvement, and construction standards and specifications applicable to development of the Project and in effect as of the date of this Development Agreement, and (2) and those ordinances of the CITY, as implemented by this Development Agreement, rules, regulations and official policies in effect as of the date of this Development Agreement, but only to the extent that they are consistent with the Project Entitlements, as modified and/or amended by this Development Agreement (collectively the "Existing Laws"), except that the CITY's street improvement, lighting, storm drain, and the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA") standards shall be followed, and the landscape standards applicable shall be those specified in this Development Agreement or if none are so specified, the CITY's Standards. In the event of any conflict between the Existing Laws and the other CITY ordinances, rules, regulations and official policies, then the Existing Laws shall control. The CITY shall not be prevented in subsequent actions applicable to the Project, from applying new ordinances, rules regulations, and policies in effect ("Future Policies") to the extent that they do not conflict with the Existing Laws. Such conflict shall be deemed to occur if, without limitation, such Future Policies: 1. Modify the permitted types of land uses, the density or intensity of use, the maximum height or size of proposed buildings on the property, building and yard setback requirements, or impose requirements for the construction or provisions of on- site or offsite improvements or the reservation or dedication of land for public use, or the payment of fees or the imposition of extractions, other than as are in each case specifically provided for in this Development Agreement; 2. Prevent the Property Owner from obtaining all necessary approvals, permits, certificates or other entitlements at such dates and under such circumstances as the Property Owner would otherwise be entitled under this Development Agreement; 3. Render any conforming use of the Project Site a non-conforming use or any structure on the Project Site a non-conforming structure. C. Desi,qn and Infrastructure Issues 1. Gated Community The Proposed Project is approved as a private gated community, which shall include formation of a Homeowners Association. The Homeowners Association must be formed to assume responsibility and maintenance of the gates, common area streets, drainage facilities, interim detention basins, utility easements, streetlights, sidewalks, landscaping (including the north side of 'Lower Crest Collector') and walls throughout the project. The terms and conditions of the CC&Rs establishing the Homeowners Association shall be subject to City approval prior to recordation. 2. Homeowners Association and Private In-tract Slopes In-tract streetscape plans depicting slopes on the Homeowners Association and private slopes shall be reviewed and approved by CITY. Slopes of a ratio 2H:IV may be permitted up to 30-feet in height upon review and approval of the City Planner with retaining walls as approved by the City Planner. Proposed specific slope treatments, which shall be applied are depicted on Exhibit 2. Development Agreement 5 Traigh Pacific Properties /~' 3. Dry Utilities The Project Entitlements do not require that Burd vaults be installed and the CITY and Property Owner agree that no Burd vaults will be required throughout the Project Site. 4. Community Trail The Property Owner shall design and construct improvements to the CITY Community Trail network along the Etiwanda Creek levee, and parallel to the northerly extension of Etiwanda Avenue along the west project boundary, in accordance with CITY Standards. 5. Gradinq The Grading Plan, included in the Project Entitlements, shall conform to the Design Guidelines of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan. However, with an average slope across the site less than 8%, the Project is exempt from the CITY Hillside Development Regulations of the Development Code. 6. Street Sections The CITY desires that the design of East Avenue, Etiwanda Avenue and "Lower Crest Collector", be designed as depicted in the Etiwanda North Specific Plan Exhibit 13(D)/with community trail, and Exhibit 13(E), respectively. The following deviations from the standard CITY Engineering Division street standards or policies are acceptable as depicted on the approved plans included as part of'the Project Entitlements: a. The straight sections on interior streets (Street W) may be greater than 800-feet due to the fact that the project is a private gated community, thereby limiting the project from traffic impacts form any other development through the project. b. All interior streets that have driveway access to single-family residential lots may be designed with a 50-foot right-of-way utilizing a rolled curb; all other streets within the tract shall have a 60-foot right-of-way with a City standard 6-inch curb face. 7. Circulation Issues and Fees a. Transportation Fee/Traffic Impact Analysis The Property Owner shall construct all circulation improvements necessary to serve the area in and around the Project Site, as generally depicted on Exhibits 3A - eA. In addition, the Property Owner shall comply with Transportation Development Fees In accordance with CITY ordinance. Upon formation of a Community Facilities District ("CFD") Property Owner may include the cost of the improvement specified in this Section 2.C.7.b as part of the CFD financing. The Property Owner shall receive credit against, or reimbursement of costs, in excess of the Transportation Development Fee for the following "backbone" improvements as described herein, in Development Agreement 6 Traigh Pacific Properties /'~ conformance with City Policy: East Avenue, Lower Crest Collector and middle 38 feet of Etiwanda Avenue (full width across Southern California Edison corridor) b. Other Circulation Improvements The Properly Owner shall design and construct the following improvements: (i) Etiwanda Avenue: Improve as a Secondary Arterial from the north boundary of Tract 16072 to Lower Crest Collector, as depicted in Exhibit 4A. These improvements shall be completed prior to the first release of occupancy, or to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Property Owner may request reimbursement agreement to recover the cost for non-backbone improvements west of the centerline from future development as it occurs on adjacent properties in the City limits. If the Property Owner fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6-months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the Property Owner to reimbursement shall terminate. (ii) East Avenue: Construct Collector Street improvements from the north boundary of Tract 16072 to Lower Crest Collector, as depicted in Exhibit 3A. These improvements shall be completed prior to the first release of occupancy, or to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. (iii) Lower Crest Collector: Construct Collector Street improvements along the entire length of the Project Site, as depicted in Exhibit 6A. These improvements shall be completed prior to the first release of occupancy, or to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 8. Storm Drains The Property Owner shall design and construct the following improvements based on the criteria in the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Drainage Policy: a. Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area 3 Master Plan Storm Drain (i) The Property Owner shall provide adequate 'easements and construct local and Master Plan System 3 drainage facilities extending from the Project Site to the Etiwanda Regional Spreading Grounds. System 3 includes the projection of the existing open channel on the north boundary of Tentative Tract 14139, east of East Avenue to the Etiwanda Spreading Grounds. Standard drainage fees for the project shall be credited to the cost of permanent master plan facilities, in accordance with City Policy. The Property Owner may request a reimbursement agreement within 6 months of public improvements being accepted by the CITY, or all rights of the development to reimbursement shall terminate. (ii) The Property Owner shall participate in construction of Interim Master Plan Basin No. 2 and either the Etiwanda/Summit or the Etiwanda/Arrow Interim Regional Basin, to the satisfaction of the San Bernardino County Flood Control District. Development Agreement 7 Traigh Pacific Properties t~~ b. Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area 2 Master Plan Storm Drain (i) The channel along the nodh tract boundary constitutes a portion of the Master Plan System 2, which is required to protect the site from upstream flows. The channel shall be designed to be extended westerly along the Rancho Etiwanda Estates project. The Property Owner may also be required to install interim Master Plan Basin No.1, within the Project Site, to the satisfaction of the San Bernardino County Flood Control District. All flood protection improvements shall be completed prior to the first release of occupancy, or to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, including a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) issued by FEMA. Standard drainage fees for the project shall be credited to the cost of permanent master plan facilities, in accordance with City Policy. The Property Owner may request a reimbursement agreement within 6 months of public improvements being accepted by the CITY, or all rights of the development to reimbursement shall terminate. (ii) Property owner shall construct Interim Master Plan Basin No. 1 if so directed by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District. These improvements shall be completed prior to the first release of occupancy, or to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. c. Local Storm Drains The Property Owner shall construct local storm drains to convey development drainage to the Master Plan Storm Drain. E)~tend the local storm drain system as far on the Project Site as needed to contain Q25 within the tops of curbs, Q100 within rights-of-way and provide a 10-foot dry lane in Q10. The cost of the local storm drain system shall be borne by the Property Owner without Fee Credits. d. If interim basins are required by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District, easements shall be provided to the City for any lots containing said basins. Also, a maintenance agreement shall be executed guaranteeing private maintenance of the facilities, but providing the City with the right of access to maintain the facilities if private maintenance is insufficient and allowing the City to assess those costs to the developer, The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover the proportionate cost of the land and ultimate basin related facilities (outlet, etc.) from future development using the basin. If the developer fails to submit said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. e. Development within the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Drainage Area is responsible for ~he City's adopted regional drainage fee, which is not subject to fee creditJreimbursement like the master plan drainage fee. 9. Development of Park Sites Property owner agrees to construct the Parks in substantial conformity with the depiction and description of Exhibits 7A, 7B, and 7C in conformance with all applicable standards and permit requirements. The Parks improvements shall be completed substantially complete by the one-hundredth (100th) building permit issuance in the Project. The Property Owner will make a good faith effort to complete all actions necessary to secure and complete work necessary to include the off-site special event Development Agreement 8 Traigh Pacific Properties /~) parking area as depicted in Exhibit 7A. The City agrees to promptly process all applications and permits consistent with its usual and customary procedures. A portion of the required Equestrian Mitigation Fee shall be set aside as an endowment for capital replacement and maintenance purposes, in the event of private maintenance default by the tenant organization. The amount to be set aside shall be based on studies by the developer, subject to approval of the City Planner and City Engineer. The endowment shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits for the facility. 10. Park Fee/Equestrian Mitiqation Fee/Beautification Fee The Property Owner shall pay the following fees: a. Property Owner will pay CITY a sum totaling $269,000 (based upon $1,000 per unit) for equestrian purposes; however, the Property Owner shall receive Equestrian Mitigation Fee credit for development of the North Etiwanda Equestrian Center on Lot E as depicted on Exhibit 7A, which Equestrian Center development costs will be limited to the total amount of Equestrian Mitigation Fees paid by Tentative Tract 14749 and other contributing project. The current estimate of available Equestrian Mitigation Fees is $1.54 million. In addition, the Property Owner may request a reimbursement agreement from the City, for costs incurred in the development of the Equestrian Center that are over and above the obligation as noted above. The credit will be based on the actual cost of the improvements toward payment of the standard CITY Equestrian Mitigation Fee and the CITY Park Fee listed below in .Section 10 b. Reimbursement in excess of the CITY Equestrian Mitigation Fee reimbursement shall be in the form of Park Fee credits toward the payment of the City Park Fee listed below in Section 10 b. The North Etiwanda Equestrian Center shall be constructed with phase 1 of project development. b. The Property Owner shali' pay the CITY a sum totaling $1,775,400 for park purposes (based upon a value of $6;600 per ur~it); however, the Property Owner shall receive Park Credit for the improvements to the North Etiwanda Preserve Trailhead on lot F as depicted on Exhibit 7C, and for the excess development cost of the Equestrian Center pursuant to Section 10 a. above. The credit will be based on the actual cost of the improvements toward payment of the standard CITY Park Fee. The North Etiwanda Preserve Trailhead shall be constructed with phase I of project development. c. In exchange for construction of landscaping improvements along the south side of Lower Crest Collector, the Property Owners shall not be required to pay CITY Beautification Fees for future residential construction. 11. Development Standards The project shall be developed in accordance with the following Development Standards. The Development Standards set the minimum requirements, however, the intent of the Project is to develop the project consistent with the goals of the CiTY's Low-Density Residential District of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan. a. Lot Area: 6,400 SF minimum b. Lot Width: 60-feet minimum as measured at building setback line. Development Agreement 9 Traigh Pacific Properties d. Lot Coveraqe: 40% maximum of lot area for building structures. Paving driveways patios or pools shall not be calculated as part of building coverage. e. Buildinq Setbacks (i) Front Yard: Should be staggered with a minimum of 18- feet and an average of 20 feet throughout the tract as measured at the right-of-way line. (ii) Side Yard: 15ofeet building separation is required with a minimum of 5-feet and 10-feet side yards measured form the property line. (iii) Rear Yard: 15-feet minimum useable (iv) Garaqe Placement: Where garages are entered from the local street and the garage doors do not face the street (side-entry garages) the setback shall be 10-feet minimum from the back of the sidewalk. (v) Buildinq Heiqht: 35-feet maximum f. Number of Housinq Units: The project entitlements include 269 housing units. 12. Desiqn Review Process The Project, and all subsequent applications for residential development, shall be subject to the CITY Development/Design Review process. 13. Architectural Guidelines The Project, and all subsequent applications for residential development, shall be subject to the Architectural Guidelines of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan. 14. Open Space Transfer Plan The Property Owner shall transfer to the County of San Bernardino Special Districts OS-1 other qualified conservation entity approved by the City, in fee, a minimum of 164-acres of off-site land for permanent open space and habitat preservation; along with funding in an amount to be determined by County of San Bernardino Special Districts (or other conservation entity), to provide for long-term maintenance of said land. The preferred location of the off-site land is in the environment surrounding the North Etiwanda Preserve in the CITY Sphere of Influence, other properties may be considered based the review of appropriate Biological Habitat Assessments and concurrence of the CITY Planner. The transfer and funding shall occur prior to recording of the first final map of the Project. D. Timinq of Development and Fees 1. Development of the Perimeter Landscapinq and the Etiwanda North Specific Plan Neiqhborhood Monumentation All perimeter landscaping, including the Upper Etiwanda Neighborhood Monumentation, fencing, signage, and landscaping as depicted in the Etiwanda North Development Agreement 10 Traigh Pacific Properties Specific Plan Exhibit 25A-C, shall be completed prior to the release of occupancy of the 100~h dwelling within the project. In addition, improvements to East Avenue, Etiwanda Avenue and Lower Crest Collector shall conform to the Upper Etiwanda Neighborhood Landscape theme as illustrated in the Etiwanda North Specific Plan Exhibit 21 (Landscape Street Sections B-l, M-l, and Bo2, respectively). The landscape improvements shall be annexed to LMD No. 7, or other district as approved by the City Engineer. 2. Development of the Remainder of the Site Neither the property owner nor CITY can presently predict when or the rate at which phases of the project shall be developed, since such decisions depend on numerous factors which are not within the control of the Property Owner including, without limitation, market orientation and demand, interest rates, absorption, competition and other factors. The parties acknowledge and agree that Property Owner, subject to the restrictions and conditions in the Development Agreement, retains flexibility under this Development Agreement to develop the Project in such order and at such rate and times as are appropriate within the exercise of the Property Owner's business judgment. The CITY further acknowledges that Property Owner may desire to market, sell, or otherwise arrange for disposition of some or all of the Project Site, prior to development, and that the rate at which the Project develops will likely depend upon the business judgment of subsequent owners of the Project Site. 3. CITY's Cooperation CITY shall use good faith efforts to promptly process and take final action on any applications for permits or approvals filed by Property Owner with respect to the Project. Such cooperation shall include, without limitation, (a) using good faith efforts to process subsequent Development/Design Review in accordance with state regulations; and (b) promptly processing all ministerial permits in accordance with Section 2.1 below. Without limiting the effect of any other provision of this Development Agreement, any future regulation, whether adopted by initiative or otherwise, limiting the rate or timing of development of the Project Site or the extent thereof, shall be deemed to conflict with Property Owner's vested rights to develop the Project under this Development Agreement and shall, to that extent, not apply to the development of the Project. Processing and review of development proposals shall be subject to established procedures in effect in the entire CITY, including Development and Design Review, as specified in the Existing Laws. However, the criteria used in the evaluation of each development proposal shall be based on the objectives, policies and specific development standards specified herein. 4. Force Maieure Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the Development Agreement, Property Owner and CITY shall be excused from performance of their obligations under this Development Agreement during any period of delay caused by acts of God or civil commotion, riots, strikes, picketing, or other labor disputes, shortage of materials or supplies, or damage to or prevention of work by reason of fire, floods, Development Agreement 11 Traigh Pacific Properties l~( earthquake, or other casualties, litigation, acts or neglect of the Property Owner, as applicable. The time of performance of such obligations as well as the term of this Development agreement shall automatically be extended by the period of such delay hereunder. E. Future Entitlements With respect to any entitlements that Property Owner may require in the future, including, without limitation, tentative tract and parcel map approvals, conditional use permits, and DevelopmentJDesign Review, the CITY shall retain its discretionary-review authority and the CITY's applicable ordinances, rules, regulations and official policies. However, any such discretionary review shall be expressly subject to the provisions of this Development Agreement and the CITY may only impose conditions upon such discretionary entitlements which are consistent with the Project Entitlements as approved by this Development Agreement, except as otherwise specifically required by state or federal law. F. Environmental Review Other than the mitigation measures and conditions of approval set forth in the EIR and the Project Entitlements (and any additional future mitigation programs contemplated therein), no other mitigation measures for environmental impacts created by the Project, as presently approved and as evaluated in the EIR, shall be required. In connection with the CITY's issuance of any further entitlement (as contemplated in Section 2.E above), which is subject to CEQA, the CITY shall promptly commence and diligently process any and all initial studies and assessments required by CEQA, and to the extent permitted by CEQA, the CITY shall use the EIR and other existing environmental reports and studies as adequately addressing the environmental impacts of such matter or matters, without requiring new or supplemental environmental documentation. In the event CEQA requires any additional environmental review, the CITY may impose additional measures (or conditions) to mitigate, as permitted by CEQA, the adverse environmental impacts of such future entitlements, which were not considered at the time of approval of the Project. G. CITY Fees and Mandates by State and Federal Laws The Parties acknowledge and agree that the fees and impositions which may potentially be imposed by the CITY on the Project and Property Owner (collectively "fees") fall within one of three categories: (a) fees for processing land use and construction permit applications which are not otherwise governed by the provisions of Section 66000 of the Government Code (but which are subject to the limitations set forth in Sections 66013, 66014, and 66016-66018.5 of the Government Code) (collectively, the "Processing Fees"); (b) fees or other monetary exactions which are contemplated under ordinances or resolutions in effect as of the date of this Development Agreement and which purport to defray all or a portion of the cost of impacts to certain public facilities, improvements and other amenities from the development projects, including any fees described in Government Code Sections 66000 et seq. (collectively, the "Existing Fee Categories") (the Existing Fee Categories include any increases, decreases, or other modifications to existing fees, so long as such modified fees relate to the same category of impacts identified in the Existing Fee Categories); and (c) fees or other monetary exactions which may be imposed in the future by the CITY for Development Agreement 12 Traigh Pacific Properties l ~'~' purposes of defraying all or a portion of the cost of public facilities, improvements, or amenities related to development projects, but excluding the Existing Fee Categories ("other Fees"). The Property Owner's obligation to pay Fees shall be specifically governed by the following provisions: 1. Processinq Fees. 'The CITY may charge Planning and Engineering Plan Check and Permit Fees and Building Permit Fees, which are in force and effect on a CITY-wide basis at the time of Property Owner's application for a land use entitlement, or a construction permit. The amount of any Processing Fees shall be determined by the CITY in accordance with all applicable laws, including, without limitation, Government Code Sections 66013, 66014, and 66017-66018.5 (or any successor laws, as applicable). Unless otherwise agreed by Property Owner and the CITY, the Processing Fees assessed Property Owner shall be the same as those imposed upon other development projects throughout the jurisdictional limits of the CITY. 2. Other Fees. In consideration of the Property Owner's Agreement to modify the Project Entitlements as specifically set forth in this Development Agreement and implement the timing of development in accordance with the terms set forth above, no Other Fees shall be imposed upon the Property Owner or the Project during the term of this Development Agreement, except as may be specifically required to carry out any state or federal law or mandate enacted after the effective date of this Development Agreement, as necessary to mitigate environmental impacts of the project in accordance with 2.G above. 3. Fiscal Impact Analysis. CITY does not require Property Owner or the Proiect to complete a fiscal impact analysis for application or issuance of any approvals or permits that CITY might issue under this Development Agreement. H. N~n-discretionary Permits The Parties acknowledge that in the course of implementing the Project, Property Owner will, from time to time, apply to the CITY for various ministerial permits, licenses, consents, certificates, and approvals, including, without limitation, non-discretionary subdivision approvals, grading permits, construction permits, certificates of occupancy and permits required to connect the Project to utility systems under the CITY's jurisdiction (collectively the "Non-Discretionary Permits"). Property Owner shall have the right to apply for any such Non-Discretionary Permits in accordance with the Existing Laws (and any applicable Future Policies under Section 2.B, above). The CITY shall issue to Property Owner, upon such applications, all required Non-Discretionary Permits, subject only to compliance with the terms of this Development Agreement, the CITY's usual and customary fees and charges for such applications and Non-Discretionary Permits (subject to the provisions of Section H above) and the terms and conditions of the applicable permit application. The CITY further agrees that upon its approval of any plans, specifications, design drawings, maps, or other submittals of Property Owner in conjunction with such Non-Discretionary Permits (the "Approved Plans"), all further entitlements, approvals and consents required from the CITY to implement the Project which are consistent with and further implement such Approved Plans, shall be expeditiously processed and approved by the CITY in accordance with this Development Agreement. Development Agreement 13 Traigh Pacific Properties I. Cooperation 1. Cooperation with Other Public Aqencies. The CITY acknowledges that the Property Owner may apply from time to time for permits and approvals as may be required by other governmental or quasi-governmental agencies having jurisdiction over the Project, in conjunction with the development of or prevision of services to the Project, including, without limitation, approvals in connection with the developing and implementing a tertiary water system, potential transportation improvements and other on-site and off-site infrastructure. The CITY shall cooperate with Property Owner in its efforts to obtain such. permits and approvals from such agencies (including without limitation, the Cucamonga Valley Water District, the Inland Empire Utilities Agency, the San Bernardino County Flood Control District and Southern California Edison), and shall provide any documents or certificates reasonably required to process and obtain such permits and approvals. 2. Construction of Off-Site Improvements. To the extent that Property Owner is required to construct any off-site street improvements as a condition of developing the Project, the Property Owner shall make good faith efforts to acquire any off-site property interests necessary to construct the required public improvements. If Property Owner fails to do so, Property Owner shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the first final subdivision map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements under Government Code Section 66462 and 66462.5 at such time as the CITY decides to-acquire the property interests required for the public improvements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by Property Owner of all costs incurred by the City if the City decides to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security for a portion of those costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the City, at Property Owner's cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the CITY prior to commencement of the appraisal. To the extent that such off-site improvements, or the construction of any substantial infrastructure on-site, substantially benefit other property owners or other portions of the jurisdiction of limits of the CITY, the CITY agrees to assist Property Owner to the fullest extent possible in obtaining reimbursement or other fair share contribution by such other benefited property owners. Such assistance may include, without limitation, conditioning the approval of development projects proposed by such benefited property owners upon such owners' contribution, on a fair share, pro-rata basis, to the construction cost of such improvements. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the CITY agrees with respect to the infrastructure improvements which are adjacent to and benefit other properties (whether such properties are undeveloped or developed), any further discretionary approvals sought by such property owners shall be conditioned to require fair share reimbursement to Property Owner for construction and related costs incurred in providing such improvements to the extent legally permissible. 3. Public Financinq. The Parties hereby acknowledge that substantial public improvements must be funded in order to contribute to the Park, Beautification, Equestrian and School Fees, and the remainder of the Project Site and that public financing of a substantial portion of these improvements will be critical to the economic viability of the Project. Subject to CITY's ability to make all findings required by applicable law and complying with all applicable legal procedures and requirements, the Development Agreement 14 Traigh Pacific Properties CITY agrees to cooperate with and assist Property Owner to the fullest extent possible in developing and implementing a public financing plan for the payment of public infrastructure fees and the construction of the public infrastructure improvements. The implementation of such plan may include, without limitation, the formation of one or more assessment districts, or Mello-Roos community facilities districts, or the issuance of bonds, certificates of participation, or other debt securities necessary to implement such plan. J. Creation of the Landscape and Street Li,qhtinq Maintenance District The CITY agrees to promptly form the necessary Landscape Maintenance District (LMD) pursuant to California Streets and Highways Code Sections 22500 et seq (the "Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972") for the Project development to encompass the Project Site as well as the area being annexed by the CITY. The Property Owner shall pay for the formation of the LrvlD. The Parties agree that the LMD must be established no later than recordation of the First final tract map and that the CITY may create an LMD, which allows annexation of other areas. In addition, if outside agencies, upon their review and approval of various components of the project, impose any non- standard improvements that require extraordinary maintenance responsibilities of the _ CITY, the CITY may impose the creation of additional maintenance-districts upon the proposed development. Upon acceptance of improvements, the CITY (throughout the LMD) shall assume full responsibility for the maintenance, repair and replacement of the improvements to be maintained by the LMD pursuant to the LMDs governing documents. The Parties also acknowledge that assessments for the LMDs are collected annually in June, and to the extent that assessments are collected through the LMD for the period ending June 2006, the-City may request, and the Property Owner agrees to provide, reasonable cash deposit to fund the LMD. The CITY shall promptly upon receipt of assessments the following June, reimburse Property Owner for any such cash advances to fund the LMD. Property Owner shall annex to the existing Street Lighting District for arterial streets citywide (SLD1). Streetlights on local streets shall be privately maintained. Section 3. ANNUAL REVIEW A. Good Faith Compliance Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65866.1, the CITY shall once every twelve (12) months during the term of this Development Agreement, review the extent of good faith substantial compliance by Property Owner with the terms of this Development Agreement; provided, however, that it is intended that this review shall apply to the Project Site as a whole, as opposed to each individual property owner who may own a parcel comprising the Project Site. In connection with such annual review, Property Owner shall provide such information as may reasonably be requested by the CITY in Order to determine whether any provisions of this Agreement have been breached by Property Owner. If at any time prior to the review period there is an issue concerning a Property Owner's compliance with the terms of this Development Agreement, the provisions of this Section 3 shall apply. Development Agreement 15 Traigh Pacific Properties l' B. Certificate of Compliance If Property Owner is found to be in compliance with this Development Agreement after annual review, the City Planner shall, upon written request by Property Owner, issue a certificate of compliance ("Certificate of Compliance") to Property Owner stating that, based upon information known to the CITY, the Development Agreement remains in effect and Property Owner is not in default. The Certificate of Compliance shall be in recordable form and shall contain such information as shall impart constructive record of notice of compliance. Property Owner may record the Certificate of Compliance in the Official Records of the County of San Bernardino. C, Findin,q of Default If, upon completion of the annual review, the City Planner intends to find that Property Owner has not complied in good faith with the material terms of this Agreement (a "Default"), he shall first give written notice of such effect to the Property Owner. The notice shall be accompanied by copies of all staff reports, staff recommendations and other information concerning Property Owner's compliance with the terms of this Development Agreement as the CITY may possess and which is relevant to determining Property Owner's performance under this Development Agreement. The notice shall specify in detail the grounds and all facts allegedly demonstrating such noncompliance, so Property Owner may address the issues raised on a point-by-point basis. Property Owner shall have twenty (20) days after its receipt of such notice to file a written response with the City Planner. Within 10 days after the expiration of such 20-day response period, the City Planner shall notify Property Owner whether he has determined that Property Owner is in Default under this Development Agreement ("Notice of Default"). Such Notice of Default shall specify the instances in which the Property Owner has allegedly failed to comply with this Development Agreement and the terms under which compliance can be obtained: The Notice of Default shall also specify a reasonable time for Properly Owner to meet the terms of compliance, which time shall not be less.than thirty (30) days from the date of the Notice of Default, and which shall be reasonably related to the time necessary to bring Property Owner's performance into 9cod faith compliance. D. Ri,qht to Appeal Upon receipt of the Notice of Default, the Property Owner may appeal the City Planner's decision directly to the City Council. Such appeal shall be initiated by filing a w[itten notice of appeal with the City Clerk within the (10) calendar days following the Property Owner's receipt of the Notice of Default. The hearing on such appeal shall be scheduled in accordance with Section 17.02.080 of the CITY Development Code. At the hearing, Property Owner shall be entitled to submit evidence and to address all the issues raised by the Notice of Default. If, after considering all the evidence presented at the hearing, the City Council finds and determines on the basis of substantial evidence the Property Owner is in Default, then the City Council shall specify in writing to Property Owner the instances in which the Property Owner has failed to comply and the terms under which compliance can be obtained, and shall also specify a reasonable time for Property Owner to meet the terms of compliance, which time shall not be less than thirty (30) days from the date of such writing from the City Council and which shall be reasonably related to the time necessary to bring Property Owner's performance into good faith compliance. Development Agreement 16 Traigh Pacific Properties 1~' E. Property Owner's Cure Ri.qhts If Property Owner is in Default under this Development Agreement, it shall have a reasonable period of time to cure such Default before action is taken by the CITY to terminate this Development Agreement 0or to otherwise amend or limit Property Owner's rights under this Development Agreement. In no event shall such cure period be less than the time set forth in the finding of Default made under Sections 3C or 3D above (as applicable) or less than the time reasonably necessary to cure such Default. Any such cure period shall be extended by force majeure circumstances described in Section 2.D.4 above. Section 4. ENFORCEMENT A. Enforcement by Either Party Subject to all requirements mandated by applicable state or federal or other law, this Development Agreement shall be enforceable by any of the parties to this Agreement. B. - Cumulative Remedies In addition to any other rights or remedies, any of the Parties may institute legal action to cure, correct or remedy any Default (to the extent otherwise permitted herein and in Government Code Section 65864 et seq. or any successor laws and regulations), to enforce any covenant or agreement herein in this Development Agreement or to enjoin any threatened or attempted violation, including suits for declaratory relief, specific performance, and relief in the nature of mandamus. All of the remedies described above shall be cumulative and not exclusive of one another, and the exercise of any one or more of the remedies shall not constitute a waiver or election with respect to any other available remedy. The previsions of this Section 4B are not intended to modify other provisions of the Development Agreement and are not intended to provide additional remedies not otherwise permitted by law. C. Attorney's Fees In any legal proceedings brought by either party to enforce any covenant or any of the Parties' rights or remedies under this Development Agreement including, without limitation, any action for declaratory or equitable relief, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorneys' fees and all reasonable costs, expenses and disbursements in connection with such action. Any such attorneys' fees and other expenses incurred by either of the Parties in enforcing a judgment in its favor under this Development Agreement, shall be recoverable separately from and in addition to any other amount included in this judgment, and such attorneys' fees obligation is intended to be severable from the other provisions of this Development Agreement and to survive and not be merged into any such judgment. Development Agreement 17 Traigh Pacific Properties Section 5. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS A. Successors and Assiqns Subject to the provisions of Section 1C above, the terms of this Development Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Parties, and their successors and assigns, insofar as this Development Agreement refers to Property Owner, as defined herein, if the rights under this Development Agreement are assigned, the term "Property Owner" shall refer to any such successor or assign. B. Proiect as a Private Undertakinq It is specifically understood and agreed by and between the Parties that the Project is a private development, that neither party is acting as the agent of the other in any respect under this Development Agreement, and that each of the Parties is an independent contracting entity with respect to the terms, covenants and condition~ contained in this Development Agreement. No partnership, joint venture or other association of any kind is formed by this Development Agreement. The only relationship between the CITY and Property Owner is that of a government entity regulating the development of private property and the owner of such private property. C. Captions The captions of this Development Agreement are for convenience and reference only and shall in no way define, explain, modify, construe, limit, amplify or aid in the interpretation, construction or meaning of any of the provisions of this Development Agreement. D. MortRaqe Protection 1. Discretion to Encumber. This Development Agreement shall not prevent or limit Property Owner, in any manner, at Property Owner's sole discretion, from encumbering the Project or any portion of the Project or any improvements on the Project, by any mortgage, deed of trust or other security device securing financing with respect to all or any part of the Project or any improvements thereon (a "Mortgage"). 2. Effect of Default. This Development Agreement shall be superior and senior to any mortgage subsequently placed upon the property, or any portion thereof, or any improvement thereon, including the lien of any mortgage or deed of trust. Despite the foregoing, breach of any provision of this Development Agreement shall not defeat, render invalid, diminish or impair the lien of any Mortgage made in good faith for value. 3. Mortqaqee Not Obliqated. Notwithstanding anything in this Development Agreement to the contrary, (a) any holder of the beneficial interest under a Mortgage ("Mortgagee") may acquire to or possession of all or any portion of the Project or any improvement thereon pursuant to the remedies provided by its Mortgage, whether by judicial or non-judicial foreclosure, deed in lieu of foreclosure, or otherwise, and such Mortgagee shall not have any obligation under this Development Agreement to construct, fund or otherwise perform any affirmative obligation or affirmative covenant of Property Owner hereunder or to guarantee such performance, and Mortgagee may, after acquiring title to all or any portion of the Project as aforesaid, assign or otherwise Development Agreement 18 Traigh Pacific Properties transfer the Project or any such portion thereof to any person or entity, and upon the giving of notice of such assignment or transfer to the CITY and the assumption by the assignee or transferee of the obligations of the Property Owner with respect to the Property Owner or portion thereof so acquired which arise or accrue from and after the date of assignment or transfer, Mortgagee shall be relieved and discharged of and from any and all further obligations or liabilities under this Development Agreement with respect to the Project or portion thereof so assigned or transferred; and (b) the consent of CITY shall not be required for the acquisition of all or any portion of the Project by any purchaser at a foreclosure sale conducted pursuant to the terms of any Mortgage, and such purchaser shall, by virtue of acquiring title to the Project or such portion thereof, be deemed to have assumed all obligations of Property Owner with respect to the Project or portion thereof so acquired which arise or accrue subsequent to the purchase date, but such purchaser shall not be responsible for any prior defaults of Property Owner; provided, however, that in either of the instances referred to in clauses (a) or (b) above, to the extent any obligation or covenant to be performed by Property Owner is a condition to granting of a specific benefit or to the performance of a specific covenant by CITY, the performance thereof shall continue to be a condition precedent to the CITY's granting of such benefit and performance of such covenant hereunder. 4. Notice-of Default to Mort,qaqee: Riqht of Mortqaqee to Cum. If a Mortgagee files with the CITY Clerk, a written notice requesting a copy of any Notice of Default given Property Owner under this Development Agreement and specifying the address for delivery thereof, the CITY shall deliver to such Mortgagee, concurrently with delivery thereof to Property Owner, any notice given to Property Owner with respect to any claim of the CITY that Property Owner has not complied with the terms of this Development Agreement or is otherwise in Default under this Development Agreement. Each such Mortgagee shall have the right (but not the obligation) for a period of thirty (30) days after the expiration of any cure period given to Property Owner with respect to such Default, to cure such default; provided, however, that if any such Default cannot, with diligence, be remedied or cured within such thirty (30) day period, then such Mortgagee shall have such additional time as may be necessary to remedy or cure such Default, if such Mortgagee commences to remedy or cure within such thirty (30) day period, and thereafter diligently pursues and completes such remedy or cure. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Default is of a nature which can only be cured by Mortgagee by obtaining possession, such Mortgagee shall be deemed to have remedied or cured such Default such Mortgagee shall, within such thirty (30) day period, commences efforts to obtain possession and carry the same forward with diligence and continuity through implementation of foreclosure, appointment of a receiver or otherwise, and shall thereafter remedy or cure or commence to remedy or Cure the Default within the cure period specified in Section 3.E above. 5. Bankruptcy. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 5D4 above, if a Mortgagee is prohibited from commencing or prosecuting foreclosure or other appropriate proceedings in the nature thereof to obtain possession of the Project Site by any process or injunction issued by any court or by any reason of any action by any court having jurisdiction of any bankruptcy or insolvency proceeding involving Property Owner, Mortgagee shall for the purposes of this Development Agreement be deemed to be proceeding with diligence and continuity to obtain possession of the Property during the period of such prohibition if Mortgagee is proceeding diligently to terminate such prohibition. Development Agreement 19 Traigh Pacific Properties 6. Amendment to Development Aqreement. The CITY and Property Owner agree not to modify this Development Agreement or to allow this Development Agreement to be modified or amended in any way, or cancel this Development Agreement, without the prior written consent of each Mortgagee, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. Notwithstanding anything stated above to the contrary, the CITY and Property Owner shall cooperate in including in this Development Agreement, by suitable implementing agreement from time to time, any provision which may reasonably be requested by a proposed Mortgagee for the purpose of implementing the mortgagee-protection provisions contained in this Development Agreement and allowing such Mortgagee reasonable means to protect or preserve the lien of the Mortgage on the occurrence of a default under the terms of this Development Agreement. The CITY and Property Owner each agree to execute and deliver (acknowledge, if necessary for recording purposes) any implementing agreement necessary to effect such request; provided, however, that any such implementing agreement shall not in any material respect adversely effect any rights of the CITY under this Development Agreement or be materially inconsistent with the substantive provisions of this Development Agreement, the Project Entitlements and the Existing Laws. E. Consent Where the consent or approval of any of the Parties is required in or necessary under this Development Agreement, unless the context otherwise indicates, such consent or approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. F. Entire A.qreement This Development Agreement and the documents attached to and referred to in this Development Agreement constitute the entire agreement between Parties with respect to the subject matter of this Development Agreement. G. Further Actions and Entitlements Each of the Parties shall cooperate with and provide reasonable assistance to the other to the extent contemplated under this Development Agreement in the performance of all obligations under this Development Agreement and the satisfaction of the conditions of this Development Agreement. H. Governinq Law This Development Agreement including, without limitation, its existence, validity, construction and operation, and the rights of each of the Parties shall be determined in accordance with the laws of the State of California. I. Recordinq The CITY Clerk shall cause a copy of this Development Agreement to be recorded in the office of the Recorder of the County of San Bernardino no later than ten (10) days following the effective date of this Development Agreement. Development Agreement 20 Traigh Pacific Properties J. Time Time is of the essence in this Development Agreement and of each and every term and condition of this Development Agreement. K. Waiver The failure of any of the Parties at any time to seek redress for any violation of this Development Agreement or any applicable law or regulation or to insist upon the strict performance of any term or condition shall not prevent any subsequent act or omission of the same or similar nature which would have originally constituted a breach of or default under this Development Agreement from having all the force and effect of an original breach or default, and such subsequent act or omission may be proceeded against to the fullest extent provided by this Development Agreement. No provision of this Development Agreement shall be deemed to have been waived by a party unless the waiver is in writing and signed by all of the Parties. L. Pa~ial Invalidity If any term, covenant, condition or provision of' this Development Agreement is held' by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remainder of the provisions of this Development Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and shall in. no way be affected, impaired or invalidated thereby. M. Notices All notices between the CITY and Property Owner and any transferee under this Development Agreement, shall be in writing and shall be given by personal delivery, mail or facsimile. Notice by personal delivery or facsimile shall be deemed effective upon delivery of such notice to the party for which it is intended at the address set forth below {or, in the case of a transferee in a written notice to the CITY). Notice by mail shall be deemed effective upon receipt or rejection of the addressee. The Parties' current addresses are as follows: To CITY: Mr. Jack Lam, AICP City Manager City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga CA 91730 With Copies to: Mr. James Markman City Attorney Richards, Watson, & Gershon One Civic Center Circle Brea CA 92821 Development Agreement 21 Traigh Pacific Properties To Property Owner: Mr. Tom Tracy Traigh Pacific/Parkwest Landscape Cio Tracy Development Company 26862 Paseo Cardero San Juan Capistrano CA 92675 Either Party may change its mailing address or the person to whom notices are to be sent at any time by giving written notice of such change to the other Parties in the manner provided above. N. Indemnification Property Owner hereby agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the CITY and its Council members, representatives, agents, officers, attorneys, and employees (the "Indemnified Parties") from and against any third party claim, action, or proceeding against the Indemnified Parties to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Development-Agreement, the Project Entitlements or both. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have duly executed this Development Agreement as of the day and year first above written. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TRAIGH PACIFIC PROPERTIES Dba TRACY DEVELOPMENT By: By: Mayor NAME/TITLE A'I-I'ESTED TO: PARKWESTLANDSCAPE By: City Clerk NAME/TITLE APPROVED ASTO FORM:' City Attorney Attorney for Traigh Pacific Properties (et.al.) Development Agreement 22 Traigh Pacific Properties ~).~:~ RECEIVED - PLANNING Exhibit "A" Annexation to the City of Rancho Cucamonga LAFCO No. That parcel of land in an unincorporated area of Rancho Cucamonga, being all of the NW Quarter, and the West Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 21, Townshipl North, Range 6 West, San Bemardino Meridian, in the County of San Bemardino, State of California, more particularly describes as follows: BEGINNING at a northeast comer of the existing boundary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as established on "LAFCO No. 2879", said point also being the Northwest Comer of said Section 21; Thence leaving said existing city boundary line and continuing easterly along the northerly line (~fsaid Section 21 the following courses: 1. North 89°14'16" East, 1325.26 feet; 2. North 89° 14'56" East, 1325.25 feet; 3. North 89° 14' 48" West, 1324189 feet to the northeast comer of the West Half of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 21; 4. Thence southerly along the east line of said west half, South 00° 00'55" West, 2641.71 feet to the Southeast comer of said west half; Thence continuing westerly along the southerly line of the North Half of said Section 21 the following courses: 5. South 89° 16'39" West, 1324.88 feet; 6. South 89° 17'08" West, 1325.19 feet; 7. South 89° 14'13" West, 1324.98 feet to a point on the west line of said Section 21, being also a point on the existing boundary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as established by said LAFCO No. 2879; 8. Thence continuing northerly along the existing city boundary line and said section line, North 00° 00'30" East, 2640.16 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Page l of 2 This proposed annexation contains 240.97 acres, more or less. This legal description was prepared by me or under my direction. By:_ Robert D. Vasquez, L.S. 7300 Date Deputy County Surveyor J]JppOrRb No. --_._] epared~YI Page 2 of 2 ~)/~ EXHIBIT 'B' t NW 1/4, AND W 1/2, NE 1/4 OF SECTION 21 T 1 N, R 6 W, S.B.M. ..~.co.. LEGEND: . · , . > 9A" , ' AFFECTED AGENCIES acs E. TflJrd Street son Bernardlno, CA 924tS-OB35 -- ow or~mcuocuc~oNc~ --- I~"l~"'J ANNEXATION TO THE CITY / ' A~. ~ANIEL C. NOYE OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA VICINI~ JA~ ~' - --- ~.~. ~~- .-.,~' CONCEPTU~ G~G PLAN TENTATIVE T~CT NO. 14749 ...... SLOPE TREES: PROPERTY LINE SEE DETAIL ~ WALL/VIEWFENCE RANDOM MASSES ON SLOPE LOT IRREGULAR VISUAL PLANE ALONG SLOPE WITH VARYING GROWTH HABITS TYPICAL SLOPE PLANTING SECTION NOT TO SCALE · ~ u~ \, ~ ,~ LOT 'Z' ~ ..~ (REMAINDER PARCEL '~. ~x~s~. s~. ~R~N ~ S.B.C.F.C.D. ,~ [WF / FW~ Col~struct ;=sst Ave. ~]fftrect to 23rd Street or to connect to a street section of at least that which Is shown on Exhibit 3B. whichever occurs first. R/W R/W 12' 22' /~' 11' TRAIL I ~. J'~ '1 ~"'-~-'~"'~--~- '"'x~ EXIST. GRND EXIST. GRND. / EAST AVENUE ~? LOT 'F' "~ '~* PARK ~ Construct Et~anda Ave. per ~ R/w I · 12 . . 32 .~. 32 ~ , 12 £$UT.' ~ ~ .... 2~ ~ .~ ~l ~x. ~" ~w W~E~ ~ EXIST. GRND. / ~/ ~ ETIWANDA A~NUE EX. 12" DOM, WATER ~ ~OM LOWER CREST S'LY R/~ 66' i' £$~T. TRAIL ~'--'~-"~---~""~. EXIST. CRND. EXIST. GRND. ~ · EAST AVENUE LOT ~)' · - Con~truct · er Crest Collecto · ~ / - LOWER CREST COLLECTOR FROM ETIWANDA AVE. TO 900'~: E'LY R/W VARIES 22' S.C.E. LOWER CREST COLLECTOR FRO~ 900':1: £'L¥ OF [TlWANDA AVE TO EAST AVE. LOT ~ pAP~JNG RECAP: MJSDesign Group r~'~ll[dm~'~ ~lJ~n ~t~ Landscape Architecture + Planning + Design and lraiflmad Parkk~j Let Sight Ran EXHIBIT 7A Development Agreement DRC2003-00411 Equestrian Center Design Amenities General Description: The Equestrian Facility as proposed would consist of a large enclosed arena (100 feet by 250 feet).. Two covered round pens would be located one on each end for exercising animals and teaching some lessons. Bleacher seats for up to 50 persons would be needed for spectators. There would be 10 -12 barn stalls to house Program horses. Special Event parking (up to 12 such events per year) would include 20 Trailer and 50 passenger car spaces to be located on a graded but unimproved area on adjacent to the south SBCFCD (fee owned)/SCE (easement) Utility Corridor Area. Other items would include snack bar, office, community meeting room, and care taker apartment within the main Barn Structure. The Arena would be used for riders, shows, clinics and seminars. This area would be equipped with lights and bells for the disabled. A hydraulic lift would be available for those in wheel chairs or others in need of assistance with mounting and dismounting. The living quarters would be used as a Care Taker residence for someone (possibly a student needing experience or an internship) to care for the animals and property. The following detail list constitutes the desired and not final amenities and will be modified based upon budget considerations during the design phase: 1. Indoor and outdoor dust control 2. Indoor Fly control system 3. Concrete floors on indoor barn and aisle with rubber mats/eqatile 4. Indoor Barn Stalls equipped with Dutch type doors 5. Ventilation - Cooling/Heating,System for Barn complex (meets appitcable UBC) 6. Automatic Fire and Burglar Alarm System 7. Closed cimult (B&W) TV monitoring system 8. Lighting both inside and out (outside area minimum 1 candle foot secudty requirement of the City) 9. 270 V electrical connection for ceramic kiln for Art Therapy Program 10. Data and Cable TV wired to Office and Care Taker Unit. 11. Telephones in Barn Aisle, Office and Care Taker Unit. 12. Out door drop off area and vehicle circulation for both disabled and Horse Trailers 13. On site Staff and Visitor Parking - 6 Spaces. 14. Automatic Waters both inside and outside for each stall and 1 in the center aisle with individual and independent shut off valves. 15. Manure container enclosure with weekly pick up. 16. Signage 17. Inside and outside PA system 18. 2 Round Pens with covers 19. Vehicle security gates for driveway connections. 20. 12 outdoor horse stalls with covers and enclosures on three sides for visitors. 21. Limited (250 Sq. ft. max.) accent landscaped and irrigated planter at building entrance. 22. Perimeter landscaping shall be included within street and trail right of way and maintained by the LMD. 23. Arena Footing will consist of a minimum 6" gravel base, 4" arena Sand, and 2" of pine shavings or material may be considered during the design phase Exhibit 7 B ~:=:~l ~:~ I LOT ~' PAP, KING R~CAP: LOT 'F' T~IL H~ PA~ING P~l~a~ ~uBs~n ~m~ MJSDesign Group ,~. aad Tralaead P~aO ~ SI~ ~ ~nds~pe Amhite~ure + Planning + Design EXHIBIT 7C THE CiTY 0 F I~ANC HO CUCAM ONCA DATE: August 4, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director BY: Dawn Haddon, Purchasing Manager SUBJECT: 2004 AMENDMENT TO COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the adoption of the attached resolution, which will establish and/or adjust certain fees for Police Department and Community Services Department. Any fee model is based on a comparison of use, participation and attendance reflective of actual cost. It is analyzed and updated annually. Please see'summary schedule for new fees and services. Other fees and services remain unchanged. For ease of review, deletions are noted in blue, additions are noted in red. Respectfully submitted, Lawrence I. Temple Administrative Services Director Attach. T H E C I T Y 0 F RANCHO CUCAMONGA Memorandum DATE: August 3, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager __~..~ ~. FROM: Dawn Haddon, Purchasing Manager SUBJECT: CORRECTED PAGES FOR INCLUSION ON FrEM Gl, COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE Attached, please find corrected pages for item G1 on page 8 of the City Council Agenda dated August 4, 2004. The attached sheet replaces page 1 of the Comprehensive Fee Schedule, Resolution No. 04-261. RESOLUTION NO. 04-XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A NEW COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE FOR ~ .~..H-n SERVICES PP. OV!DE-n _Y .~.LL C!TY DEP.~.RT ....... S, ............................... PROTECTION ~ SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT AND THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA POLICE DEPARTMENT, BY MODIFYING CERTAIN FEES ESTABLISHED IN RESOLUTION 03-030 A. RECITALS. (i) The Government Code requires that prior to levying a new fee or increasing an existing fee or service charge, local agencies shall hold a public meeting at which oral or written presentations may be made; and (ii) Notice of the time and place of the hearing has been properly provided; and (iii) No valid request for mailed notice is on file with the City; and (iv) Copies of the required data were made available in the City Clerk's office to the public on Mc~dc:,., Jc~u~r~.' 27, 2003 Monday August 2, 2004 (v) All legal prerequisites to adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. RESOLUTION. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve that the following fees are established: SECTION 1: BUILDING AND SAFETY FEES 1.0 Buildinq Permit Fees A fee for each building permit or service shall be paid to the Building Official as set forth in the following Schedule of Fees: Total Valuation of Work Fees $1 .oo to $1,000.® ................................ $25.® $1,001.°°to$2,000.® .......................... $25.® for the first $1,000.oo plus $2.® for each additional $100.oo or fraction thereof, to and including $2,000.o0 A RESOLUTION OF TH E CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A NEW COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE FOR PERMITS AND SERVICES PROVIDED BY ALL CITY DEPART- MENTS, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA POLICE DEPARTMENT, BY MODIFYING CERTAIN FEES ESTABLISHED IN RESOLUTION 03-030 A. RECITALS. (i) The Government Code requires that prior to levying a new fee or increasing an existing fee or service charge, local agencies shall hold a public meeting at which oraJ or written presentations may be made; and (ii) Notice of the time and place of the hearing has been properly provided; and (iii) No valid request for mailed notice is on file with the City; and (iv) Copies of the required data were made available in the City Clerk's office to the public on Monday, January 27, 2003 (v) All legal prerequisites to adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. RESOLUTION. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve that the following fees are established: SECTION 1: BUILDING AND SAFETY FEES 1.0 Buildinq Permit Fees A fee for each building permit or service shall be paid to the Building Official as set fo~h in the following Schedule of Fees: Total Valuation of Work Fees $1 .oo to $1,000.® ................................ $25.® $1,001.°°to$2,000.® .......................... $25.® for the first $1,000.® plus $2.® for each additional $100.® or fraction thereof, to and including $2,000.® Resolution No. 04-XXX Page 2 Total Valuation of Work Fees $2,001.°°to$25,000.® ........................ $45.® for the first $2,000.® plus $7.s° for each additional $1,000.® or fraction thereof, to and including $25,000.® $25,001.00to$50,000.00 ...................... $217.5o for the first $25,000.® plus $5.5o for each additional $1,000.® of fraction thereof, to and including $50,000.®. $50,001.°°to$100,000.® .................... $355.® for the first $50,000.0,0 plus $4.® for each additional $1,000.® or fraction thereof, to and including $100,000.o0. $100,001.°° and over ........................... $555.® for the first $100,000.® plus $2.5o for each additional $1,000.® or fraction thereof. 1.1 Plan Review Fees (a) When the valuation of proposed construction exceeds one thousand dollars, and a plan is required to be submitted, a plan review fee shall be paid to the Building Official at the time of plan submittal. (b) Plan review fees for buildings and structures shall be equal to seventy-five percent (75%) of the building permit fees set forth in Section 1.0 herein. (c) Plan review fees for electrical, mechanical and plumbing work shall be equal to 25% of the total permit fee as set forth under the pertinent Section 1.7, 1.8 and 1.9 herein. (d) Plan review fees for grading shall be as set forth in the following schedule: Resolution No. 04-XXX Page 3 Quantity of Cut and Fill Fees 50 100 yards .................. $50.00 101 500 yards ............... $100.°° 501 1,000 yards ............... $200.® 1,001 2,000 yards ............... $250.00 2,001 3,000 yards ............... $300.® 3,001 4,000 yards ............... $350.oo 4,001 5,000 yards ............... $400.® 5,001 10,000 yards ............... $500.® 10,001 50,000 yards ............... $600.® 50,00 100,000 yards ............... $700.oo 100,001 yards and up ............... $900.oo The sum of Cut and Fill Yardage shall be used in computing Grading Permit and Plan Checking Fees. (e) Repetitive plan checking of production tract homes that have been previously plan checked and approved under adopted codes may have the plan check fees reduced by 50% (fifty pement), This will only apply to plans when the Design Amhitect submits a letter with his/her wet stamp and signature certifying that plans are identical to the previously approved plans. The new plans shall be wet stamped with a signature of the Design Architect. (f) Additional Plan Checking made necessary due to changes in plans or incomplete plan submission, $55.® per hour for the estimated time of checking revisions. 1.2 Compliance Inspections/Re-inspections Inspections to determine compliance of existing construction with applicable codes when not included in an active, valid building permit or inspections made necessary due to work not being ready at time specified, or work not corrected after prior written correction notice ................................................................................... $30.® 1 .__3 Chan.qe of Occupancy Change of Occupancy Inspection ........................................................ $50.® 1.4 Relocated Buildinqs Fees for inspection of a structure to be relocated into or within the City shall be $100.® when located within 25 miles of City offices, plus $2.® per mile, round trip, when located more than 25 miles from City offices. Resolution No. 04-XXX Page 4 1 .._~5Appeal of Abatement Notice An appeal of a Notice to Abate a substandard or dangerous building ............................................................................................... $100.® 1.._~6 Inspection for Temporary Utility Connection or Temporary Occupancy Inspection ............................................................................................. $30.00 1.._[7 Inspections Outside of Normal Business Hours (Minimum charge, four hours) .................................................. $50.o0 hourly 1 .._~8 Inspections for Which No Permit Fee Is Specifically Indicated (Minimum charge, one-half hour) ............................................. $50.00 hourly 1 .~9 Electrical Permit Fees (a) Permit Issuance For ssuing each permit ..................................................... $15.® For issuing each supplemental permit ................................ $ 4.s° (b) System Fee Schedule NOTE: The following are in addition to permit - issuing fee. New Residential Buildings: The following fees shall include all wiring and electrical equipment in or on each building, or other electrical equipment on the same premises constructed at the same time. For new residential buildings not including the area of garages, carports and other noncommercial automobile storage areas constructed at the same time, per square foot ......................................................... $ .035 For new garages, carports and other minor accessory buildings constructed in conjunction with a new residential building per square foot .................................... $ ,02 For other types of residential occupancies and alterations, additions and modifications to existing residential buildings, use the Unit Fee Schedule. Resolution No. 04-XXX Private Swimming Pools, Spas: Page 5 For new private residential, permanently installed spas, hot tubs or swimming pools for single-family and multi-family occupancies including a complete system of necessary branch circuit wiring, bonding, grounding, underwater lighting, water pumping and other similar electrical equipment directly related to the operation of a swimming pool, each ............................ $30.00 For other types of swimming pools, spas and alterations to existing swimming pools, use the UNIT FEE SCHEDULE. Carnivals and Circuses: Carnivals, circuses, or other traveling shows or exhibitions utilizing transportable-type rides, booths, displays and attractions. For electric generators and electrically driven rides, Each ................................................................................... $15.® For mechanically driven rides and walk-through attractions or displays having electric lighting, Each ..................................................................................... $4.5o For a system of area and booth lighting, each .................... $4.~° For permanently installed rides, booths, displays and attractions, use the UNiT FEE SCHEDULE. Services: For services of 600 volts or less and not over 200 amperes in rating, each ....................................................... $18.5o For services of 600 volts or less and over 200 amperes to 1000 amperes in rating, each ...........................$37.~ For services over 600 volts or over 1000 in rating, each ...................................................................................... $75.® Temporat3/ Power Service: For a temporary service power pole or pedestal including all pole or pedestal-mounted receptacle outlets and appurtenances, each ........................................ $15.® For a temporary distribution system and temporary lighting and receptacle outlets for construction sites, decorative light, Christmas tree sales lots, firework stands, etc., each ................................................................. $7.5o c) Unit Fee Schedule: NOTE: The following are in addition to permit issuing fee. Resolution No. 04-XXX Page 6 Receptacle, Switch and Lighting Outlets: For receptacle, switch, lighting or other outlets at which current is used or controlled, except services, feeders and meters. First 20, each ..................................... $ .75 Additional outlets, each ....................................................... $ .45 NOTE: For multi-outlet assemblies, each 5 feet or fraction thereof may be considered as one outlet. Lighting Fixtures: For lighting fixtures, sockets or other lamp-holding devices. First 20, each ........................................................ $.75 Additional fixtures, each ...................................................... $ .45 For pole or platform-mounted lighting fixtures, each .......... $ .75 For theatrical-type lighting fixtures or assemblies, each.... $ .75 Residential Appliances: For fixed residential appliances or receptacle outlets for same, including wall-mounted electric ovens; counter- mounted cooking tops; electric ranges, self contained room, console, or through-wall air conditioners; space heaters; food waste grinders; dishwashers; washing machines; water heaters; clothes dryers; or other motor- operated appliances not exceeding one horsepower (HP), kilowatt (K~N), or kilovolt-ampere (KVA), in rating, each ...................................................................................... $3.°° NOTE: For other types of air conditioners and other motor-driven appliances having larger electrical ratings, see Power Apparatus, Non-Residential Appliances: For non-residential appliances and self-contained factory- wired, non-residential appliances not exceeding one horsepower (HP), kilowatt (KW), or kilovolt-ampere (KVA), in rating including medical and dental devices; food, beverage, and ice cream cabinets; illuminated show cases, drinking fountains, vending machines; laundry machines; or other similar types of equipment, each .......... $3.0o NOTE: For other types of air conditioners and other motor-driven appliances having larger electrical ratings, see Power Apparatus. Resolution No. 04-XXX Page 7 Power Apparatus: For motors, generators, transformers, rectifiers, synchronous converters, capacitors, industrial heating, air conditioners and heat pumps, cooking or baking equipment and other apparatus, as follows: Rating in horsepower (HP), kilowatts (KW), kilovolt- amperes (KVA), or kilovolt-amperes-reactive (KVAR): Up to and including 1, each ................................................. $3.® Over 1 and not over 10, each .............................................. $7.50 Over 10 and not over 50, each .......................................... $15.50 Over 50 and not over 100, each ........................................ $30.00 Over 100, each .................................................................. $45.50 NOTE: 1. For equipment or appliances having more than one motor, transformer, heater, etc., the sum of the combined ratings may be used. 2. These fees include all switches, circuit breakers, contractors, thermostats, relays and other directly related control equipment. Busways: For trolley and plug-in-type busways, each 100 feet or fraction thereof ................................................................. $4.50 NOTE: An additional fee will be required for lighting fixtures, motors and other appliances that are connected to trolley and plug-in-type busways. No fee is required for portable tools. Signs, Outline Lighting and Marquees: For signs, outline lighting systems or marquees supplied from one branch circuit, each .............................. $1 5.50 For additional branch circuits within the same sign, outline lighting system or marquee, each ............................ $3.00 Miscellaneous Apparatus, Conduits and Conductors: For electrical apparatus, conduits and conductors for which a permit is required but for which no fee is herein set forth ................................................................... $1 1 .ce NOTE: This fee is not applicable when a fee is paid for one or more services, outlets, fixtures, appliances, power apparatus, busways, signs or other equipment. 1.10Plumbinq Permits Resolution No. 04-XXX Page 8 (a) Permit Issuance For the issuance of each permit ........................................ $15.® For issuing each supplemental permit ................................. $4.s° (b) Unit Fee Schedule (in addition to issuance fee above) For each plumbing fixture or trap or set of fixtures on one trap (including water, drainage piping, and back protection therefore) .................................................... $6.® For each building sewer and each trailer park sewer .......$15.® Rainwater systems - per drain (inside building) .................. $6.00 For each cesspool (where permitted) ................................ $22.~° For each private sewage disposal system ........................ $45.oo For each water heater and/or vent ...................................... $7.o0 For each industrial waste pretreatment interceptor including its trap and vent, excepting kitchen-type grease interceptors functioning as fixture traps ................. $12.® For installation, alteration, or repair of water piping and/or water-treating equipment, each ................................ $3.® For repair or alteration of drainage or vent piping, each fixture ........................................................................... $3.® For each lawn sprinkler system on any one meter, including back flow protection devices therefore ................ $9.® For atmospheric-type vacuum breakers not included in lawn sprinkler system: 1 to 5 .................................................................. $7.o0 Over 5, each ....................................................... $1 .o0 For each backflow protective device other than atmospheric-type vacuum breakers: 2 inches and smaller .......................................... $7.~° Over 2 inches ................................................... $15.® For each gas piping system of one to four outlets .............. $3.® For each gas piping system of five or more, per outlet ...... $ .75 Swimming pool or spa piping including water heater (not including gas piping) ................................................... $10.o0 Resolution No. 04-XXX Page 9 1.11 Mechanical Permits A fee for each mechanical permit shall be paid to the Building Official as set forth in the following Schedule of Fees: (a) Permit Issuance For the issuance of each permit ........................................ $15.oo For issuing each supplemental permit ................................. $4.oo (b) Unit Fee Schedule (in addition to issuance fees above) For the installation or relocation of each forced-air or gravity-type furnace or burner, including ducts and vents attached to such appliance, up to and including 100,000 Btu/h ....................................................................... $9.oo For the installation or relocation or each forced-air or gravity-type furnace or burner, including ducts and vents attached to such appliance over 100,000 Btu/h ................................................................................... $11 .oo For the installation or relocation of each floor furnace, includin§ vent ....................................................................... $9.oo For the installation or relocation of each suspended heater, recessed wall heater or floor-mounted unit heater ................................................................................... $9.® For the installation, relocation or replacement of each appliance vent installed and not included in an appliance permit ................................................................... $4.~° For the repair of, alteration of, or addition to each heating appliance, refrigeration unit, cooling unit, absorption unit, or each heating, cooling, absorption, or evaporative cooling system, including installation of controls regulated by this code ........................................ $9.® For the installation or relocation of each boiler or compressor to and including three horsepower, or each absorption system to and including 100,000 Btu/h ..................................................................................... $9.® For the installation or relocation of each boiler or compressor over three horsepower to and including 15 horsepower, or each absorption system over 100,000 Btu/h and including 500,000 Btu/h ....................... $16.5o For the installation or relocation of each boiler or compressor over 15 horsepower to and including 30 horsepower, or each absorption system over 500,000 Btu/h to and including 1,000,000 Btu/h ............................ $22.oo Resolution No. 04-XXX Page 10 Unit Fee Schedule For installation or relocation of each boiler or compressor over 30 horsepower to and including 50 horsepower, or for each absorption system over 1,000,000 Btu/h to and including 1,750,000 Btu/h ........... $33.~° For the installation or relocation of each boiler or refrigeration compressor over 50 horsepower, or each absorption system over 1,750,000 Btu/h ................. $56.00 For each air-handling unit to and including 10,000 cubic feet per minute, including ducts attached thereto ................................................................................. $6.so NOTE: This fee shall not apply to an air-handling unit which is an integral portion of a factory assembled appliance, cooling unit, evaporative cooler or absorption unit for which a permit is required elsewhere in this code. For each air-handling unit over 10,000 cfm .......................$11 For each evaporative cooler other than portable type ........ $6.00 For each ventilation fan connected to a single duct ............ $4. For each ventilation system which is not a portion of any heating or air-conditioning system authorized by a permit ................................................................................ $6.5o For the installation of each hood which is served by mechanical exhaust, including the ducts for such hood ..................................................................................... $6.00 For the installation or relocation of each domestic- type incinerator .................................................................. $11 For the installation or relocation of each commemial industrial-type incinerator ................................................... $45.® For each appliance or piece of equipment regulated by this code but not classed in other appliance categories, or for which no other fee is listed in this code ...................................................................................... $6.00 1.12 Permit Fees A fee for each Grading Permit shall be paid to the Building Official as set forth in the following Schedule of Fees: Resolution No. 04-XXX Page 11 Quantity of Cut and Fill Fees 50 cubic yards or less ........................ $15.50 51 to 100 cubic yards ......................... $22.50 101 to 1,000 cubic yards .................... $22.5o for the first 100 cubic yards plus $10.~° for each additional 100 cubic yards or fraction thereof. 1,001 to 10,000 cubic yards .............. $117.00 for the first 1,000 cubic yards, plus $9.® for each additional 1,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof. 10,001 to l00,000cubicyards ..........$198.® for the first 10,000 cubic yards, plus $40.50 for each additional 10,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof. 100,001 cubic yards or more ............. $562.50 for the first 100,000 cubic yards, plus $22.50 for each additional 10,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof. 1.13 Application for Plan Duplication Application for duplication processing .................................................. $50.00 SECTION 2: BUSINESS LICENSE FEES Fees for Business Licenses are found within Title 5 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, Business Taxes, Licenses and Regulations and contained in Chapters 5.04, 5.08, 5.12 and 5.16, thereof. Resolution No. 04-XXX Page 1 2 SECTION 3: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE FEES 3.1 Municipal Code Municipal Code .................................................................................. $1 50.00 Supplements to the Municipal Code will vary in cost and will be billed accordingly .............................................................. Amount Variable Binder- Printed Hardcover for Mun c pa code .............................. $50.® (Additional covers) 3.._~.2 Passport - Miscellaneous Application Processing Fee ................................. $30.o0 perapplication Photos ............................................................... $1 2.® per set of two photos SECTION 4: COPYING RATES~ MEDIA AND SUBSCRIPTION FEE~ ALL DEPARTMENTS Fee Activity Fees Photocopies ....................................... $ .25 per page* Campaign and Economic Interest Statement Retrieval Fee .............................. $5.® per request Campaign and Economic Interest Statement Retrieval Fee .............................. $ .10 per request Microfilming ........................................ $ .25 per page* Map/Plan Reproductions $3.® per sheet/per plan page Microfiche Jackets ............................. $1.00 per sheet Audio Tape ......................................... $1 0.00 per tape Video Tape ......................................... $1 0.00 per tape Computer Diskettes ........................... $1 0.00 per diskette Compact Disc ..................................... $1 0.00 per disc Resolution No. 04-XXX Page 13 Subscriptions Fees Council Agenda .................................. $118.® per year Minutes ............................................... $145.00 per year Planning Commission Agenda .......... $ 43.5o per year M~nutes ............................................... $160. per year Historic Preservation Comm. Agenda ............................................... $ 9.°° per year Engineering Plans and Specifications per set cost ......................................... Amount Variable Mailing Costs for the above (overnight) ......................................... Amount Variable Map/Plan Reproductions ...................$3.® per sheet FAX Requests - ALL DEPARTMENTS A maximum of 6 pages may be requested .............................. No Fee** *There will be a minimum charge of $1.°o for 1-3 pages ** If material requested is more than 6 pages, material will be mailed and billed at rate established by this Resolution. SECTION 5: ENGINEERING FEES 5.'1 Applications Fees Certificate of Compliance ................... $1,190.® Lot Line Adjustment ........................... $1,190.® Amending Map ................................... $1,190.® Reapportionment Map ....................... $600.® A two-sheet ParceYTract Map; $30.°° for each additional sheet · O0 Street Vacation .................................. $1,156. Standard Agreement/Doc. Processing ......................................... $298.® Release of Lien Agreement ............... $298.00 Certificate of Correction ..................... $256.® Flood Hazard Letter ........................... $314.® Bond Subsbtubon ............................... $420. Resolution No. 04-XXX Page 14 Fees Private Street Designation ................. $495.oo Reimbursement Agreement Storm Drain ........................................ $2,227.® Street and Utilities .............................. $2,827.® Traffic Study Review (Dev. Proj.) ......................................... $751 .oo 5.2 Map and Plan Checkin.q Fees Fees Property Legal Description ................ $584.00 Map Chebking Residential Parcel Map ...................... $1,370.® + $180.® per Pamel Tract Maps and Non-Residential Pamel Maps of 10 lots or less ........... $2,070.® Tract Maps and Non-Residential Parcel Maps over 10 lots ................... $1,720.oo + $35.® per Parcel or Lot 5.3 Improvement Plans Fees Widening of Existing Streets .............. $1.3~ per LF + sheet Charge for Interior Streets Interior Streets Fees 1-2 Sheets: ......................................... $1,370.oo per sheet 3-5 Sheets: ......................................... $2,740.® + $1,200.oo per sheet over 2 sheets 6-10 Sheets: ....................................... $6,340.oo + $1,095.® per sheet over 5 sheets 11 or More: ......................................... $11,815.00 + $1,025.oo per sheet over 10 sheets Storm Drain Plans .............................. Same as for Interior Streets Resolution No. 04-XXX Page 15 Hydrolo,qy Study Fees Drainage Areas up to 150 Acres ....... $1,370.® Drainage Areas over 150 Acres ........ $2,740.® Landscape and Irrigation Plans for City-Maintained Areas .................. $400.® per sheet For map and plan checking, the fees for rush checking, when approved by the City Engineer, will be 50% greater than those listed above. The fees for checking the revisions to approved plans will be on the basis of actual costs at hourly rates as determined by the City Engineer with a minimum fee of $100.°°. 5.._~4 Public Works Construction Permit Fee 5% of Improvement Cost to $25,000.oo, minimum $50.oo 4.5% of Improvement Cost for next $75,000.® 4% of Improvement Cost over $100,000.°° The Improvement Cost of a project shall be based on the Engineer's Cost Estimate as shown on Surety Bond and as approved by the City Engineer. A refundable deposit is also required. NOTE: Development Impact Fees may also apply and are addressed under separate resolutions. 5.5 Oversize Loads Fees Single Permit* .................................... $15.® Repetitive Permit*. ............................. $70.o0 initial fee + $15.® per month renewal fee to a maximum of 6 months Annual Permit*. .................................. $70.® per year * These fees are based on the provisions of the California Vehicle Code Section 35795 and CalTrans Fee Schedule. Resolution No. 04-XXX Page 16 5.6 Other Fees Collection of San Bernardino County fees, as adopted by the County, including but not limited to: # Documentary Handling Fee for Filing Notice of Determination # Development Review Fees # County Recording Fee # County Printing Fee SECTION 6: FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT FEES These Fees have been adopted by the Fire Board 6.1 Plans Checking Fees Includes Plan Review and two Inspections. Does NOT include Fee for any required Fire District Permits. A. Start-Up Fee for Commercial, Industrial or Multi-family Dwelling Units, paid prior to TRC.....$82.00 B. Plan Review Fees 1. Single Family Residence ................................................. $132.® 2. Single Family Residential Tract, per Phase .................... $132.® 3. Multi-Family Residential, per Building ............................. $677.® 4. Commercial and Industrial Development, per Building...$677.00 5. Water Plan/Underground Water Supply ......................... $132.00 6. Conditional Use Permit .................................................... $132.0o 7. Minor Development Review ............................................. $132.00 8. Parcel Map Review .......................................................... $132.® 9. Tenant improvement; per hour, one hour minimum .......... $87.® 1 0. Special Events' Review ...................................................... $87.00 11. Accessory Plans Review: Aisles, Access, Seating, Etc .............................................. $66.® 12. Alternate Method Approval ................................................ $92.® 1 3. Revision to existing Plan (e.g., As-Builts, Excluding TI Plans) .................................. $92.® 14. New Fire Sprinkler Systems, Standpipes or over ten heads .......................................... $164.® 15. Fire Sprinkler Alteration, ten heads or less ....................... $92.00 16. Pre-Engineered Fire Protection Systems ........................ $147.® 17. Fire Detection and Alarm Systems .................................. $1 54.® Resolution No. 04-XXX Page 17 Plan Review Fees 18. Flammable Finishes Spray Booth, per booth .................. $164.® 19. LPG Tank Installation Review, per tank .......................... $147.® Underground Storage Tank Removal Review, per tank ........................................................................... $147.00 21. Flammable & Combustible Liquid, Tank & Piping ........... $147.® 22. Failure to keep Appointment, one hour minimum ............. $66.o0 23. Microfilm Charges, per page ............................................... $1.00 24. Minor Plan Review not requiring a District Inspection.... No Fee C. Inspection Fees Per hour, one hour minimum 1. Field Inspection required after the Initial and Fo ow-Up Inspection ................................................ $110.® 2. Failure to keep an Inspection Appointment ....................... $66.00 3. Field Inspection of Self-Inspection Occupancies, F ' oo a~lure to Comply ............................................................... $66. 4. Fire Flow Test, ' 00 W~tness Test ............................................. $87. 5. Unscheduled Field Inspection or Investigation .................. $66.0o 6. Same Day, Short Notice Inspection .................................. $87.0o 6....~2 .I. Permit Fees [Initial Permit and subsequent renewal of Permit unless otherwise indicated (e.g. one time only Permit activity)] A. Permits 1. General Use ' 00 Permit ........................................................... $82. 2. Access Control ................................................................ No Fee 3. Aerosol Products (more than 500 lbs. of Level 2 or 3) ...$131.00 4. Aircraft Refueling ' oo Vehicles ................................................ $95. 5. Aircraft ' 00 Repair Hangar ....................................................... $84. 8. . . oo Automobile Wrecking Yard ................................................ $82. 7. Asbestos Removal ........................................................... $132.°° 8. Bowling Pin or Alley Refinishing involving Flammable F~n~shes ........................................................... $82. 9. Candles and Open Flames in Assembly Areas·.... NOT PERMITTED 1 0. Carnivals and Fairs (see also 6.2E) ................................ $132.0o 11 · · oo . Cellulose N~trate F~lm ......................................................... $82. 12. Cellulose Nitrate Storage, more than 25 lbs ..................... $84.oo 13. Combustible Fiber Storage, more than 100 cubic feet ...... $82.® Resolution No. 04-XXX Page 18 Permits 14. Combustible' Material Storage, more than 2,500 cubic feet .............................................. $115.® 15. Compressed Gases: a. Corrosive, 200 cubic feet or more ................................. $95.® b. Flammable, 200 cubic feet or more .............................. $84.® c. Highly Toxic, any amount .............................................. $95.® d. Inert/Simple Asphyxiant, 6,000 cubic feet or more ....... $85.® e. Irritant, 200 cubic feet or more ...................................... ;84.00 f. Other Health Hazards, 650 cubic feet or more ............. :184.00 g. Oxidizing (includes Oxygen), 504 cubic feet or more...: 184.00 h. Pyrophoric, any amount ................................................ ~95.00 i. Radioactive, any amount ............................................... ~98.00 j. Sensitizer, 200 cubic feet or more ................................ ~95.00 k. Toxic, any amount ......................................................... ~95.00 I. Unstable (Reactive), any amount ................................ $132.o0 16. Commemial Rubbish-Handling Operations ....................... $84.0o 17. Cryogens: a. Corrosive -- Inside, over 1 gallon .................................. $95.® b. Corrosive -- Outside, over 1 gallon .............................. $95.® c. Flammable -- Inside, over I gallon ................................ $84.® d. Flammable -- Outside, 60 gallons or more ................... :~84.00 e. Highly toxic -- Inside, over I gallon ............................... ~95.00 f. Highly toxic -- Outside, over I gallon ............................ :;95.00 g. Nonflammable -- Inside, 60 gallons or more ................. I;95.® h. Nonflammable -- Outside, 500 gallons or more ............ I;84.® i. Oxidize -- Inside, 50 gallons or more ............................ ;84.® j. Oxidizer -- Outside, 50 gallons or more ........................ $84.0o 18. Dry Cleaning Plants ......................................................... $132.00 19. Dust-Producing Operations ............................................... $84.00 20. Explosives or Blasting Agents: a. Storage, Manufacture, Process or Sell ........................ $84.® b. Use ............................................................................. $150.® 21. Fire Hydrants and Water-Control Valves, use for other purposes ...................................................... $ 84.® 22. Fire Protection Systems and Equipment, per building ... No Fee 23. Fireworks: a. Retail Sales ...................................................... NOTPERMDrTED b. Aerial Displays (see also 6.2E) .................................... $84.oo Resolution No. 04-XXX Page 19 Permits 24. Flammable or Combustible Liquids: a. Pipeline, to Use, Operate, Repair or modify a Pipeline ....................................... $132.® b. Class I Liquids, more than 5 gallons Inside a Building ......................... $84.® c. Class I Liquids, more than 10 gallons Outside a Building ....................$84.® Exceptions to b. & c.: 1. Storage or use of Class I Liquids in Vehicle, Vessel, Aircraft or Equipment Fuel Tanks. 2. Storage or use of Paints, Oils, Varnishes, or Similar Mixtures for Maintenance, Painting or Similar Purposes for less than 30 days. d. Class II or II-A Liquids, more than 25 Gallons Inside a Building ...................... $ 84.® e. Class II or III-A Liquids, more than 60 gallons Outside of a Building ............... $ 84.oo f. To remove Class I or II Liquids from an UST by other than Normal Operation ...........$ 95.oo g. Installation, Construction, Alteration or Operation where Flammable or Combustible Liquids are Produced, Processed, Transported, Stored, Dispensed or Used in any of the following: Tank Vehicles ........................................................ $95.® Equipment ............................................................ $105.oo Tanks, per tank .................................................... $121.00 Plants ................................................................... $132.® Terminals ............................................................. $132.® Wells, per well ....................................................... $ 84.® FueI-Dispensin.cl Stations (Single and/or Multiple. . Pump ~tations) ........................................ $ 95.~ Rehnenes ............................................................. $132. Distilleries ............................................................. $132.® h. Installation, Alteration, Removal, Abandon, Place Temporarily out of Service or otherwise Dispose of a tank which contained Flammable or Combustible LiquidS132.00 i. To change the type of contents in a Flammable or Combustible LiquidS132.® 25. Fruit Ripening ................................................................... $105.® 26. Fumigation or Thermal Insecticidal Fogging ................... $121.00 Resolution No. 04-XXX Page 20 Permits 27. Hazardous Materials: (see also other Permit Sections) For multiple Permits within this Section 25, the Fee will be the total of all related Permits to a maximum of $400.® or Actual Costs, whichever is greater. a. Carcinogens, 10 lbs. or more .................................... $132.® b. Corrosive Liquids, 55 gallons or more ......................... $84.® c. Corrosive Solids, 500 lbs. or more .............................. $95.® d. Flammable Solids, 100 lbs. or more ............................ $95.o0 e. Highly Toxic Liquids and Solids, any amount .............. $95.® f. Irritant Liquids, 55 gallons or more .............................. $84.® g. Irritant Solids, 500 lbs. or more .................................... $84.® h. Oxidizing Liquids: Class 4, any amount .................................................... $84.® Class 3, 10 lbs. or more ............................................... $84.oo Class 2, 100 lbs. or more ............................................. $84.oo Class 1,500 lbs. or more ............................................. $84.® i. Oxidizing Solids: Class 4, any amount .................................................... $84.® Class 3, 10 lbs. or more ............................................... $84.® Class 2, 100 lbs. or more ............................................. $84.® Class 1,500 lbs. or more ............................................. $84.® j. Organic Peroxide Liquids and Solids: Class 1, any amount .................................................... $95.® Class 2, any amount .................................................... $95.® Class 3, 10 lbs. or more ............................................... $95.® Class 4, 20 lbs. or more ............................................... $95.oo k. Other Health Hazards: Liquids, 55 gallons or more ......................................... $84.o0 Solids, 500 lbs. or more ............................................... $84.® I. Pyrophoric Liquids, any amount .................................. $95.® m. Pyrephoric Solids, anyamount .................................... $95.® n. Sensitizer Liquids, 55 gallons or more ........................ $95.oo o. Sensitizer Solids, 500 lbs. or more .............................. $95.® p. Toxic Liquids, 10 gallons or more ................................ $95.oo q. Toxic Solids, 100 lbs. or more ..................................... $95.oo r. Unstable (Reactive) Liquids: Class 4, any amount .................................................. $132 Class 3, any amount .................................................. $132.® Class 2, 5 gallons or more ......................................... $132.o0 Class 1, 10 gallons or more ....................................... $132.oo Resolution No. 04-XXX Page 21 Permits s. Unstable (Reactive) Solids: Class 4, any amount .................................................. $132.00 Class 3, any amount .................................................. $132.® Class 2, 50 lbs. or more ............................................. $132.® Class 1,100 lbs. or more ........................................... $132.00 t. Water-Reactive Liquids: Class 3, any amount .................................................... $95.® Class 2, 5 gallons or more ........................................... $95.® Class 1, 10 gallons or more ......................................... $95.® u. Water-Reactive Solids: Class 3, any amount .................................................... $95.® Class 2, 50 lbs. or more ............................................... $95.® Class 1,100 lbs. or more ............................................. $95.00 28. Hazardous Production Materials for H-6 Occupancies_.$132.® 29. High Piled Combustible Storage ........................................ $99.® 30.Liquefied Petroleum Gases; Store, Use, Handle or Dispense ........................................ $84.o0 31. Liquid or Gas-Fueled Vehicles or Equipment in Assembly Buildings ............................... $105.® 32. Lumber Yards .................................................................... $84.® 33. Magnesium Workings ...................................................... $121.00 34. Mall, Covered (see also 6.211D4) ....................................... $84.® 35. Motor Vehicle Fuel-Dispensing Stations ......................... $100.00 36. Open Burning .................................................................. No Fee 37. Organic Coatings ............................................................. $132.00 38. Ovens: industrial Baking or Drying ................................... $84.00 39. Pallet Storage .................................................................... $84.00 40. Places of Assembly: a. A-4 Stadiums, Reviewing Stands and Amusement Park .................... $84.® b. A-3 Occupant Load of 50 to 299 without a Stage ....... $95.00 c. A-2.1, Occupant Load of 300 or more without a Stage ................................. $147.00 d. A-2 Occupant Load of less than 1000 with a Stage .................................. $169.0o e. A-1 Occupant Load of 1000 or more with a Stage .................................... $225.oo 41. Pyrotechnical Special Effects Material (See also 6.2E) .................................................................. $84.0o 42. Radioactive Materials ...................................................... $132.00 Resolution No. 04-XXX Page 22 Permits 43. Refrigeration Equipment .................................................. $115.00 44. Repair Garages .................................................................. $84.00 45. Spraying or Dipping ........................................................... $84.® 46. Tents, Canopies and Temporary Membrane Structures: a. 201 to 400 square feet ................................................. $84.® b. 401 to 1500 square feetl ............................................ $110.00 c. 1501 to 15,000 square feet ........................................ $147.® d. 15,001 to 30,000 square feet ..................................... $178.0o e. Over 30,000 square feet ............................................ $210.® 47. Tire Storage ..................................................................... $132.® 48. Welding and Cutting Operations ....................................... $ 84.0o II. Special Services A. Excessive or Malicious False Alarms causing Response of Fire Apparatus. 1. Response due to "Failure to Notify" the Fire Department when working on or testing Sprinkler or Fire Alarm System. $153.00 per hour per piece of Emergency Apparatus responding 1/2 hour, minimum charge. 2. Malicious False Alarms. $153.00 per hour per piece of Emergency Apparatus responding with 1/2 hour, minimum charge. 3. Response Due to Alarm Malfunction. $153.00 per hour per piece of Emergency Apparatus responding to all False Alarms in excess of two (2) False Alarms in 30 days with 1/2 hour, minimum charge. 4. Response to False Alarms due to negligence, tampering with the system, construction or modification of the building. $153.00 per hour per piece of Emergency Apparatus responding with 1/2 hour, minimum charge. 5. Response to False Alarm by Battalion Chief and/or Fire Inspector. $50.ee per hour with 1/2 hour, minimum charge. Resolution No. 04-XXX Page 23 Special Services B. Response to Fire Setter Incidents (Juvenile or Adult) and DUI Callouts: 1. Cost Recovery for Emergency Apparatus responding. $2.s° per minute per piece of Equipment. 2. Cost Recovery for Personnel responding. $ .83 per minute per Person. 3. Cost Recoveryfor Battalion Chief or Fire Investigator responding. $ .45 per minute. C. Response to mitigate Extended Hazardous Chemical and Material Incidents beyond Normal Service requires (this includes response to railroad properties, freeways, and aircraft crashes). 1. Hazardous Incident, Overhead and Command, per hour. $273.00 per hour per piece of Apparatus 2. Apparatus and Crews assigned to the Incident, per hour. $170.°° per hour per piece of Equipment 3. Specialized Resources - HAZMAT Crews and Equipment. Actual Costs 4. Materials and Supplies used for the Incident. Actual Costs D. Special Activities - Apparatus and Crews assigned to activities that require the services, at Permittees expense, of one or more standby Fireflghters. $153.00 per hour per piece of Apparatus $ 30.00 per hour, two-hour minimum per District employee, two-hour minimum charge. E. Accelerant Detection Canine Team, Use of Arson K-9 Team by other Agencies. Fire Scene Examinations: $50.°° per hour, two-hour minimum charge Resolution No. 04-XXX Page 24 Hourly Travel Rate: $25.oo per hour, one-hour minimum, to and from Search Area Mileage, round trip ................................................. $ .35 mile Administrative Reports ............................... $25.00 per hour Mounted Photographs .......................................... $1.5° each F. Board of Appeals Requiring a Special Meeting ..................................... $245.00 SECTION 7: GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM FEES Request Fees GIS Data, Digital Format .................... $37.® per hour plus costs of material(s) Plots .............................................. $30.oo CD ROMS ..................................... $1 .oo Diskettes ....................................... $ .30 ZIP Disc ........................................ $10.® JAZ Disc ....................................... $90.® 4mm Tape .................................... $29.® Zoning Map 34 X 44" Color, E Size Sheet ............. $30.oo Zoning or General 8-1/2 X 11" B/VV Plan Map (Vicinity) ...... $1.00 Zoning or General 8-1/2 X 11" Color Plan Map (Vicinity) ..... $5.® General Plan Map 34 X 44" Color, E Size Sheet ............. $30.® Flood Plain Map 34 X 44" Color, E Size Sheet ............. $30.® Request Fees Land Available for Potential Development Report -- Citywide .......$25.oo Land Available for Potential Development Report -- Residential...$15.® Land Available for Potential Development Report- Commercial/Industrial ....................... $15.® Resolution No. 04-XXX Page 25 Request Fees Land Available for Potential Development Report- Specific Plan ...................................... $15.® Land Available for Potential Development Report -- Citywide 34 X 44" Color, 2 "E" Size Sheets .............................. $50.oo Special Reports and/or Maps ............ Time and Materials + $500.® Deposit SECTION 8: LIBRARY FEES These Fees have been adopted by the Library Board of Trustees Fines Fines are based on item rather than patron. Forexampla: A child borrowing adult materials will be assessed an adult overdue fine. Overdue Fine Per Item: Fine Borrowing Per Day Maximum Thresholds Adult ............... $ .25 ..................... $10.oo .................... $5.® Child ren .......... $. 10 ..................... $ 5.°° ..................... $5.oo Video .............. $1 .oo ...................... $10.oo .................... - ....... Best Seller Videos ............ $2.® ...................... $10.oo .................... - ....... DVD ................ $2.oo ...................... $10.oo .................... - ....... CD/ROM Software ......... $2.oo ...................... $10.oo .................... - ....... Magazine ........ $ .10 ..................... $1 .oo ..................... _ ....... Rental Fees Per Item: Loan Per Item Rental Fee Period Type Limit V deo .............. $1 .oo ...................... 7 days ................... 8 video titles, total Business Series Video .............. $2.® ...................... 3 days ................... 8 video titles, total Best Seller Videos ............ $2.® ...................... 3 days ................... 8 video titles, total DVD ................ $2.® ...................... 7 days ................... 4 DVD titles, total Best Seller DVD ................ $2 ....................... 3 days ................... 4 DVD titles, total Resolution No. 04-XXX Page 26 Loan Per Item Rental Fee Period Type Limit Audio Cassette ......... $ .25/cassette ....... 14 days ................. 4 audio cassette titles $2.® max. CD .................. $ .25 ..................... 14 days ................. 4 CD titles Best Seller CD .................. $ .50 ..................... 14 days ................. 4 CD titles Read Alongs...$ .25/cassette ....... 1 4 days ................. 4 Read Along titles Best Seller Rental Books..$1.00 ...................... 7 days ................... 4 books/No Reserves CD/ROM Software 00 ' ......... $2 ....................... 7 days ................... 4 CD/ROM t;tles Test/Deposit Books ............. $20.® Refundable Deposit Charged -- Checks Allowed; Credit Card Allowed Fees for Services: Interlibrary Loan ................................. $2.00 Reserves ............................................ $ .50 Marketing Library Card ...................... $3.00 Lost Library Card ............................... $2.0o for regular card $3.00 for marketing card Collection Fee .................................... $1 5.® per account Test Monitoring Fee ........................... $1 0.00 per test session Temporary Card ................................. $ .50 Technolo.q¥ Center: Fee in-house Computer Rental .................$3.® per hour Technology Classes Fee internet Basic Searching .................... $15.® per class Internet Intermediate Searching ........ $15.0o per class Internet Advanced Searching ............ $15.00 per class Resolution No. 04-XXX Page 27 Printouts: Fee Color ................................................... $ .30 B/W ..................................................... $. 1 0 Photocopies: Fee Color Photocopies .............................. $ .75 B/W Photocopies: Coin .................................................... $ .15 Debit Card .......................................... $ .10 Microform Copies ............................... $ .15 Research/Business Services: Fe._~e Business Locator Services ................ $5.00 per business, no charge if business is not located Brief Business Profile ......................... $1 0.00 per business, no charge if business is not located Each additional profile, $6.® Business Lists on Demand ................ $ .05~cents per record, $10.w minimum On line Data Base Searches ............. Cost of Online Connect Time + $5.® Lost Materials: Item Item Cost Processing Fee Books ............. Original Cost .............. + $5.® Media .............. Original Cost .............. + $6.® Paperback . . 5o Books ............. Original Cost .............. + $2. Magazines ...... $3.® ............................ + $1.00 Damaged Materials: Type of Damage/Loss Processing Fee Bar Code Removed ........................... $2.® Book(s) .............................................. List Cost in Computer Cover Damaged ........................... $5.® Plastic Cover Damaged ............... $2.00 Page Torn .................................... $1.0o per page Resolution No. 04-XXX Page 28 Type of Dama.qe/Loss Processinq Fee Compact Disc(s) ............................... List Cost in Computer Broken Jewel Case: Singles .......................................... $1.5o Doubles ........................................ $3.® Loss of Liner Notes ............................ $5.® Loss of Book/Pamphlets .................... $5.oo Video Cassette(s) ............................. List Cost in Computer Shell Replacement ....................... $5.oo Storage Case Damage ................ $5.® Audio Book(s) ................................. List Cost in Computer Double Case ................................ $5.00 4 Storage Case ............................ $6.® 12 Storage Case .......................... $7.oo Cassette Boxes ............................ $1 .oo SECTION 9: PLANNING FEES 9.1 Applications Those charged as a base fee, plus a per unit or per acre amount, with a maximum set at three times the base fee. Application Base Fee Per Unit Fee Maximum Fee Tentative Tract Map ........................ $2,987.® ............... $60.oo per d/u ....... $8,961 .oo Conditional Use Permit ........................ $2,921 .oo ............... $292.® per acre ...$8,763.® Development/Design Review- Residential (5 or more) ........................ $2,851 .oo ............... $57.® per d/u ....... $8,553.® Development/Design Review- Commercial/Industrial ........................ $2,851 .oo ............... $285.® per acre ...$8,553.® Initial Study ........................ $1,000.oo ............... $150.® per acre...$2,500,oo General Plan Amendment ........................ $2,866.® ............... $287.oo per acre ...$8,598.® Specific/Commercial Plan Amendment. * ........................ $2,866.® ............... $287.® per acre ...$8,598.oo Development District Amendment* ........................ $2,866.® ............... $287.oo per acre ...$8,598.® · Should be charged at half rate if filedin conjunction with a General Plan Amendment. Resolution No. 04-XXX Page 29 9.._~2 Applications Those charged on a time-and-materials basis with a deposit taken up front. Application Deposit Amount EIR Review - Sensitive ....................................... $10,000.® Development Agreement Review ......................... $5,000.00 Mitigation Plan - Complex ..................................... $1,000.® Annexation ............................................................ $2,000.® Deve opment Agreement ...................................... $2,000.°° New Specific/Community Plan ...........................$10,000.® EIR Preparation .................................................... $5,000.® Challenge to Environmental Studies ................ $5,000.® 9.3 Other Application Fees Application Fee Dev/Design Review: 4 du's or less ............................................... $1,027.°° EIR Review Only ......................................... $2,370.® Hillside Development Review 5 or more du's ............................................. $1,462.® Hillside Development Review 4 ' 0o or less du s .................................................. $244. Landmark Application .................................... $728. Residential and Small Business ............. No Fee · O0 Landmark Alteration ....................................... $835. Residential and Small Business ............. No Fee Mills Act . . oo Apphcat~on ....................................... $724. Residential and Small Business ............. No Fee Minor Development ' 0e Rewew ........................... $296. Minor Exception ............................................. $170.® Minor Time ' 0o Extension .................................... $136. Mitigation Plan (Complex) .......................... (See 9.2) Mitigation Plan (Simple) ................................. $719.® Resolution No. 04-XXX Page 30 Application Fee Non-Construction CUP .................................. $435.oo On-Site Subdivision sign cash deposit - Refundable ........................................................................ 500.00 Off-Site Subdivision sign cash deposit - Refundable ...................................................................... $500.00 Pre m nary Rev ew 325 ® Sign Perm t ........................................ $51 ® Temporary Use Permit ..................................... $68.oo Temporary Use Permit Model Home ............. $219.oo Temporary Use Permit Model Home Restoration Deposit Refundable ................................................ $5,000.® Tentative P oo arcel Map .................................. $2,514. Time Extension .............................................. $549.oo Uniform Sign P oo rogram ................................... $580. Use D · . oo eterm~nabon ......................................... $315. Var ance 871 ® Variance: 4 du's or less .................................................. $291 .oo 9.._~4 Appeal Fees Application Fe__e Appeal of a City Planner,Decision ........... $62.® Appeal of a Commission Decision in (~onnection with an Application ............ $126.® Appeal of a Tract Map ............................. $251 .oo or Parcel Map 9.5 Other Fees Application Fee Pre-application Review (P ann'ng Commission) ............................ $325.® Enterta nment Permit ............................... $571 .oo Adult Entertainment Zoning Permit ......... $571 .oo Home Occupation Permit ......................... $53.® Large Family Day Care Permit ................ $170.® Resolution No. 04-XXX Page 31 Application Fee Public Convenience or Necessities (Alcohol Beverage Control Licenses) ...... $315.® Recycling Facilities Permit ....................... $296.® Status Map Application ............................ $15.® Trail Easement Vacation .......................... $1,190.® Tree Removal/New Development ............ $432.® Tree Removal/Existing Development ...... $72.® Land Use Verification Report ................... $25.® NOTE:Planning Division Fees for documents, which are individually priced, are contained in the Document Price List. SECTION 10: RECREATION FEES Following are current fees for recreation activities and rentals. All consumable costs are to be recovered. Definition of classes of fees by groups. GROUP 1: City of Rancho Cucamonga sponsored and co- sponsored events and other governmental agencies.,. GROUP 2: .Not-Non-profit, civic, athletic, social ornanizations ~"~;~*~'~ ;"~ .... ';~" ";~' churches and schools which are located and based in the City. Applies to those functions that provide a se~ice to the community of Rancho Cucamonga. GROUP 3: ~ ~ ~ ~ ;~ ~hC City City resident private pa~ies, employee organizations, political candidate fundraisers and social events. City resident non-profit functions that do not meet Group 2 criteria. Non-resident, non-profit, civic, social organizations and schools. GROUP4: ~;* ..... ;~ ~,;,,~, .... * .... *;,,;*,,. ~, ~; .... ~ ~;~ ..... ~ City resident Resolution No. 04-XXX Page 32 commercial, business and profit making activities. Non-resident private parties, employee associations, commercial, business, profit making organizations and churches. Nei,qhborhood and Community Park Li,qhted Sports Venue Fee~ All Rancho Cucamonga based youth sports organizations which are recreation in nature and meet an overall residency rate of a minimum of 80% will have their light fee waived in full. Other sports organizations will pay their light fee in full (100%) for the electrical costs only. Classes/Workshops/Proq rams Classes and workshops shall be structured on a cost-covering basis, and fees shall be set based upon the market rate of similar programs provided in the cities of Chino, Fontana, Ontario and Upland. Non-Resident Char.qe A $~.~ $10.°° fee shall be paid by each non-resident, each class, each team member, each season to participate in City-sponsored classes. Said fee is payable at the time of registration. Does not include one-day activities or any trips sponsored by the City. Facility Rentals ~.-....i...,,-.~..-. ~-...,.. t,.q~,,4o,, ..+, ..... s~ ~ ,-, ,..-, ~,.;~ ......... fc!!CwS: Fr!d3); 5 p,.,,m,. 3,'t.d !~tcr, £ct~,rd3y, Hourly fees are based upon weekday use, Monday through Thursday from 8:00 a.m.-10:00 p.m. and on Friday from 8:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m. An increased rate for weekend use will be applied to Friday night use after 5:00 p.m. and all use on Saturday, Sunday and holidays. NOTE: All non-profit community based youth organizations are permitted one free board meeting or membership meeting per month. Each non-profit group may use one room without charge for participant registration no more than twice prior to their season and no more than four hours for each use. Groups who require room use beyond the above criteria are charged the Group 2 building rental hourly fees. Resolution No. 04-XXX Page 33 GRO'JP Roo~'~ S~ZE T~.~5 I 2 3 4 5 ~"'"" ~°~' "'""' None $8.® $8.® $25.~ ~n ~ $30.~ ~,,,~,.~'~ ~.,,~ ~,,,~ & Nono $12.~ $12.~ $35.® Sd0.® Sd0.~ ~tO~. D~;~ ~t ~ ~ ......... Sonior GROUP Roo~ ~z~ T~uE 1 2 3 4 5 C ~ ....* o~ ~ ~,c~o $12.® $12.~ $40.~ $45.~ $~5 ® , ....* ~ ~o~ ~ ~,~.~ $20.~ $20.~ $50 ~ $55.® $55.~ GROUP 1 2 3 4 5 None $5.® $5.® $10.~ $10.~ $15.® Resolution No. 04-XXX Page 34 City of Rancho Cucamonga Facility Listings City of Rancho Cucamonga Facility Listings Fees Per Hour - 8:00 am - 10:00 pm M - Th Fees Per Hour - Friday 5:00 pm - Saturday and Sunday Friday 8:00 am - 5:00 pm Room Name iG oup ii oro. 21Grou, 3 I Group4 RoomName IGro. ,I Orouo2 I Gro., 3 I Grouo4 Central Park - Senior Central Park - Senior DavidDreierEventHallA&B $ - 523.00 5 75.o015 BS.00 i)a*idDreierEventHallA&B $ $06.00 $ 95.00 ;104.0( Event A $ - $15.00 $ 50.001$ 57.00 Event A $ $ 25.00 $ 83.00 $ 69.0( Event B $ - $15.00 $ 50.00 $ 57.00 Event B $ $ 25.00 $ 53.00 $ 69.0C TimberMountain/GoldRidge $ - $ 16.00 $ 47.00 $ 57.00 TimbcrMountain/GoldRidgc $ - $ 23.00 66.00 $76,00 Timber Mountain $ - Bt0.00 $ 31.00 $ 38.00 Timber Mountain $ $ 16.00 I$ 44.00 $ 50.0C GoldRidge $ - $10.00 $ 31.00 $ 38.00 GoldRidge $ - $ 15.00 $ 44.00 ii 50.0f ClayCreek $ - $t5.00 $ 50.00 $ 57.00 ClayCrcek $ - $ 25.00 $ 63.00 69,00 GamePoinl $ - $t5.00 $ 50.00 $ 57.00~ GamePoim $ - $ 25.00 $ 63.00 69.00 Mesa Courtyard $ - $ 10.00 $ 3t.00 $ 38.00 Mesa Courtyard $ $ 15.00 $ 44.00 $ 50.00 Lookout Lounge $ - $10.00 $ 31.00 $ 38.00 LookoulLounge $ $ 15.00 $ 44.00 $50.00 Large Kitchen $ - $ 20.00 $ 25.00 $ 35.00 Large Kitchen $ - $ 20.00 $ 25.00 36.00 Central Park - Community Central Park - Community Rancho Cucamonga Hall $ - $ 38.00 125.00 $ 142.0C Rancho Cucamonga Hall $ - $ 63.00 $158.00 173.00 Alta Loma $ - $15.00 $ 50.00 $ 57.00 Alta Loma $ - $ 25.00 $ 63.00 69.00 Cucamonga $ - $15.00 $ 50.00 $ 57.00 Cucamonga $ - $ 25.00 $ 63.00 69.00 Etiwanda $ - $15.00 $ 50.00 $ 57.00 Etiwanda $ - $ 25.00 $ 63.00 69.00 Grizzly Gulch / Bear Flat $ - $15.00 $47.00 $ 57.00 Orizzly Gulch / Bear Flat $ - $ 23.00 $ 66.0£i$75.00 Grizzly Gulch $ - $10.00 ii 31.00 $ 38.00 Grizzly Gulch $ - $ 15.00 $ 44.00 $ 50.00 Bear Flat $ - $10.00 $ 31.00 $ 38.00 Bear Flat $ - $ 15.00 $ 44.00 $ 50.00 Big Horn $ - $10.00 $ 31.00 $ 38.00 Big Horn $ - $ 15.00 $ 44.00 $ 50.00 Teen Lodge $ - $15.00 $ 50.00 $ 57.00 Teen Lodge $ - $ 25.00 $ 63.00 $ 69.00 Large Kitchen $ - ii 20.0C $ 25.00 $ 35.00 Large Kitchen ii '1 20.00 $ 25.00 $ 35.00 Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center Mission $ $ 15.00 $ 50.00 $ 57.00 Mission I$ $ 25.00 $ 63.00 $ 69.00 Zinfandel $ $15.00 $ 47.00 $ 57.00 Zinfanclel! $ $ 23.00 $ 63.00 $ 75.00 Zinfandel North $ $10.00 $ 31.00 $ 38.00 Zinfandel North $ $ 15.00 $ 44.00 $ 50.00 Zinfandel South $ $10.00 $ 31.00 $ 38.00 ZinfandelSouth $ I $ 15.00 $ 44.00 $ 50.00 Thompson $ - $ 10.00 $ 31.00 $ 38.00 Thompson $ $ 15.00 $ 44.00 $ 50.00 Grenache $ $10.00 $ 31.00 $ 38.00 Grenache $ $ 15.00 $ 44.00 $ 50.00 Muscat $ $10.00 $ 31.00 $ 38.00 Muscal $ $ 15.00 $ 44.00 $ 50.00 Large Kitchen $ $20.00 $ 25.00 $ 35.00 Large Kitchen $ $ 20.00 $ 25.00 $ 35.00 Lions Center West Lions Center W~st Brookside $ $15.00 $ 50.00 $ 57.00 Brookside $ $ 25.00 $ 63.00 $ 69.00 Filippi $ $15.00 $ 50.00 $ 57.00 Filippi $ $ 25.00 $ 63.00 $ 69.0( Guasti $ , $10.00 $ 31.00 $ 38.00 Guasti $ $ 15.00 $ 44.00 $ 50.0( Opici ~$ $10.00 $ 31.00 $ 38.00 Opici $ $ 15.00 $ 44.00 $ 50.0( Small Kitchen $ $ 7.00 $ 12.00;$ 20.00 Small Kitchen $ $ 7.00 $ 12.00 $ 20.0( Lions Center East Lions Center East Regina $ $15.00 $ 50.00 $ 57.00 Regina $ $ 25.00 $ 63.00 $ 69.0¢ Thomas $ - $ t0.00 $ 3t,00 $ 38.00 Thomas $ $ t§.O0 $ 44.00 $ 50.0£ Aggazzotti $ - $ 10.00 $ 31.00 $ 38.00 Aggazzotti $ $ 15.00 $ 44.00 $ 50.0~ Gai]eano $ - $ t0.00 $ 3t.00 $ 38.00 Galleano $ $ 15.00 $ 44.00 $ 50.0£ RC Family Sports Center RC Family Sports Center Eagle $ - $10.00 $ 31.005 38.00 Eagle $ $ 15.00 $ 44.00 $ 50.0£ Hawk $ - $10.00 $ 31.00 $ 38.00 Hawk $ $ 15.00~ 44.00 $ 50.0£ Cardinal $ - $10.00 $ 31.00 $ 38.00 Cardinal $ $ 15.00 44.00 $ 50.0£ Teen Cen~er $ - $ 10.00 $ 31.00 $ 38.00 Teen Center $ $ 15.00 I$ 44.00 $ 50.0£ Note: Four (4) hour minimum charge for the banquet room use on Friday after 5:00pm, Saturday and Sunday. Resolution No. 04-XXX Page 35 Cancellation Fee: A cancellation fee for all room rentals shall be assessed as follows: · 14 or more calendar days notice - full refund of all fees · 7-13 working days notice - 50% refund of all fees · 1-6 working days notice - 25% refund of all fees · No notice (no shows) - refund of damage/security deposit only. Facility Decoratin.q Discount: Rooms may be reserved for up to two (2) hours prior to and after the event at the rate of 50% of the normal room rental rate for the purposes of set-up and removal of decorations. Overtime Fee: For rentals that go over in time from their rental contract a fee will be assessed equal to staff cost plus rental fee to be calculated at a rate of time-and-a-half. Other Fees: If additional City staff is required, services will be charged at the rate of $10.® per hour for staff time. ~^~'"" '~ .... ~* ~ ...... ~'"'~ *~" "~' .... ~" $299.e~. Atthe discretion of the Community Services Director, additional damage/security deposit may be required according to event/rental requirements and the City,s liability exposure. Damage deposit fees will be applied to all groups who's use of the room (s) is defined as a party, reception, dance or includes the use of food, beverages or any other application that provides risk of damages. An additional $500.® Damage/Security deposit and a $50.® Administration Fee will be required for alcohol use at approved alcohol use City facilities. Damage/Security deposit fees may range from $100.® (small rooms) to $500.® (banquet rooms). Per Day Fees Rental Item Fee Coffee Pot (small) .............................. $5.® Coffee Pot (large) ............................... $15.® Copy Service ...................................... $ .0s per page Flip Chart/Easel ................................. $20.00 Microphone ........................................ $10.00 PA System (small) ............................. $40.oo Piano* (see Note:) .............................. $25.® Podium with PA .................................. $40.® Projector/Overhead ............................ $10.® Projector/Shde .................................... $20. Screen ................................................ $20.® Stage (large) ...................................... $50.® Stage (small) ...................................... $20.® TV. with Video Player ........................ $20.® Resolution No. 04-XXX Page 36 White Board with Easel ...................... $10.® * The piano is tuned by the City twice a year. If the piano does not meet the standards of the user, the City will arrange for tuning at the user's sole expense. Tuning fees will be added to rental cost. COMMUNITY AMPHITHEATER The following are rental fees for Amphitheaters. The first hour of monitoring is included in the stage rental for Groups 2 and 3. Community Amphitheater Fees GROUP I 2 3 4 5 6 Stage (Flat Fee) None $25.® $25.® $72.® $~0.~ $95.® Staff: Sound Monitor None $10.® $10.® $10.® $10.~ $10.~ (Hourly) Equestrian Center Fees - Room Rental (Hourly) * Fees and Charges will be as follows: GROUP ROOM SIZE TIME 1 2 3 4 5 6 Small 8am-5pm None $8.® $8.® $25.0o $30.® $30.® Small 5pm-8am None $12.® $12.® $35,0o $40.~ $~0.~ Daily Snack Bar ** None $5.® $5.® $10.® $10.® $15,® Kitchen GROUP I 2 3 4 5 6 Annual Shared Storage Fee N/C $75.® N/A N/A N/A N/A Equestrian Center Lights *** 100% Actual Energy Consumption * Includes use of P.A. System. ** A deposit may be required for this use. (See Equestrian Usage Policies.) *** The small arena will have a coin-metered box for electrical cost recovery. Storage For City Community Centers and Public Facilities, no storage will be provided to groups on an ongoing basis without the approval of the Community Services Director. Resolution No. 04-XXX Page 37 Some City parks may be reserved for use. Rental fees for picnic shelters located in these parks are as follows: Picnic Shelter (Hourly) ~.U.~LTER S!"~ I 2 3 4 5 Sma!! .~!c.".c $3.~ $3.~ $5.~ $9.~ $8.~ Lar~',o .~,~c~c $5.~ $5.(~ $8.~ $12.~ $12.~ GROUP SHELTER SIZE I 2 3 4 Small None $5.® $8.® $11 .~ Large None $7.® $11.00 $15.® Civic Center Cou~yard (Hourly) Rental of the Civic Center Cou~yard provides renter with use of the Rains Conference Room and the restrooms. For each City staff member required, se~ices will be charged at the rate of $10.® per hour per staff member. When damage/security deposit is required, the charge is $200.®. At the discretion of the Community Se~ice Director, additional damage/securi~ deposit may be required according to the even~rental requirements and the City's liability exposure. The following are rental fees for the Civic Center Cou~yard: GROUP I 2 3 4 5 6 None $20.® $20.® $50.® $55.~ $55.~ Street Banner Display Fees .................................................... $75. ~ .......... Administrative Fee ............................. $50.® If the City becomes involved in creation and preparation of the banner NOTE:Applicant is still responsible for the actual cost of banner (payable in advance). Mobile Recreation Unit Rental Three hours minimal rental $250.® Each additional hour $50.°°/hour Staffing charge Minimum of 2 staff ~$10/hr for 30 or less padicipants Additional staffing will be required for padies over 30 at ratio of 1 staff member per 15 pa~icipants. Mobile Lift Resolution No. 04-XXX Page 38 Fees Lift Service ......................................... $300.® Plus the cost of 2-Staff Members for the full time frame of the event. ($10.® hourly per Staff Member.) NOTE:Equipment is available for rent only for events conducted on City property and would require 2 part-time Staff Members to deliver, operate and return the equipment. EPICENTER TOURNAMENT AND LEAGUE FEES Rental Fees (Per Field) GROUP 1-3 2 GROUP 4-6 3-4 Field Rental* 2 Hours and Less $35.® $100.® 4 Hours and Less $70.® $200.® All Day $140.oo $265.® Deposit $250.oo $400.o0 Infield Lining Actual Cost Actual Cost Light Fee Actual Cost Actual Cost * Includes initial field dragging and watering. The deposit will be applied to the total rental fee. When additional City staffing, equipment and material are required for tournaments and/or special event programs scheduled at the Epicenter Sports fields, the applicant is required to pay all event- related expenses. This will include the cost for Police Security when deemed necessary. Community and Nei.qhborhood Park Leagues and Tournaments Should there be a need for City staff to oversee and coordinate activities, the fee is $10.® per hour per staff member required. Applicant is also required to pay all event related expenses. This will include the cost for Police Security when deemed necessary. Community Softball Field & Soccer Fields (Per Field) Organized Leagues and Tournaments* GROUP 1-3 2 GROUP 3- 4 ** 2 Hours and Less None $2~.o0 $50.® $50.~ 4 Hours and Less None $35.® $90. All Day None $~5.(~ $160.o0 $!~0.~ . 60 A $5. non-resident fee will be assessed per non-resident team per tournament. Resolution No. 04-XXX Page 39 Ail other rental fees are still applicable. ** A $200.oo refundable security, damage, cleaning, performance deposit is required. Applicant is required to pay all event related expenses. This will include the cost for Police Security when deemed necessary Rental Fees (Per Field) GROUP 1-6 4 Drag and Line* Actual Cost * Drag and Line fees include staff costs and are for one drag and line per field. GROUP 1-3 GROUP 4-.6 Bases* $20.® $40.® * Bases are available only when renting the fields for a tournament. Fee is based on per field, per day, basis subject to availability by City. Snack Bar For City-Owned snack bars located in City Parks, fees will be assessed as follows: GROUP 1. GROUP 2 GROUP 3-64 Seasonal None $450.® N/A Other non-profit groups bringing in snack bars {i.e. trailers) will be charged a flat $300.00seasonal permit fee, unless group is participating in e City-Sponsored event. Storage For City-Owned storage located in City Parks, fees will be assessed as follows: GROUP 1 GROUP 2 GROUP 3-6 4 Seasonal None $75.00 N/A R.C. FAMILY SPORTS CENTER RENTAL F;~-~ -- Athletic Use ONLY Basketball Courts (Per Court) GROUP 1 ~RO~JP 2-4 GROUP 2-3 GROUP 4 2 Hours and Less None $~.9.~ $40.® $50.® $50.~ 4 Hours and Less None $75.~ $75.00 $90.® $90. 6 Hours and Less None $!09.® $100.® $120.® $!20.~ GROUP 1 GR4;;~JP-2-4 GROUP 2-3 GROUP 4 Staff: 2 Persons None $20.® $20.® $20.® $20.® (Hourly) Refundable None $200.~ $200.°° $200.°° $200 Cleaning/Damage Deposit Resolution No. 04-XXX Page 40 Racquetball Courts (Per Court) GROUP 1 GROUP-2-,! GROUP 2-3 GROUP 4 GROUP~S-6 3 Hours and Less None $45.® $45.® $60.® 6 Hours and Less None --$75.ce $75.® $90.® $90. Staff: 2 Persons None $20.® $20.® $20.® $20. (Hourly) Refundable None ¢o~ ~ $200.00 $200.00 ~o~ Cleaning/Damage Deposit R.C. Sports Center Teen Center Rental (Hourly) GROUP 1 GROUP 2-4 GROUP 2-3 GROUP 4 ~ Rental Fee: 2 Hour Minimum None cAr~ ~ $40.® $50.00 e~r~ Staff: 1 Staff, 1-30 Persons None $10.® $10.® $10.® $!0. (Hourly) 2 Staff, 30 + Persons None $20.® $20.® $20.® $20. (Hourly) Refundable None $200.~ $200.® $200.® $200. Cleaning/Damage Deposit EPICENTER STADIUM COMPLEX FEER Stadium Events Ticketed Events * Non-Ticketed Events a. Stadium Rental $1,500.® per day $2,000.® per day plus 10% of gross ticket sales b. Sky Box Rental Rate $50.® per hour $50.® per hour c. Cafe' Area Rental Rate $50.® per hour $50.® per hour d. Pavilion Area Rental Rate i. Covered Pavilion $50.® per hour $30.® per hour (3rd Base side) ii. Open Pavilion $25.® per hour $15.® per hour (1 st Base side) e. Event Expenses Applicant is required to pay all event related expenses including personnel, equipment and materials and other related costs. Resolution No. 04-XXX Page 41 Parkinq Lot Events Ticketed Events * Non-Ticketed Events a. Stadium On-Site Lots i. Rental rates for $500.® per day $670.® per day Parking Lots plus 10% of gross A, B, C ticket sales ii. Rental rates for $250.® per day $ 335.® per day Parking Lots plus 10% of gross D, E, F ticket sale b. Expanded Parking Lots ii. Parking Lot #2 $500.°°per day $335.® per day plus 10% of gross ticket sales iii. Parking Lot #3 $1,500.® per day $2,000.® per day plus 10% of gross ticket sales OR Expanded Parking Lots iii. Event Quadrant $250.® per day $335.® per day A-F plus 10% of gross ticket sales c. Event Expenses Applicant is required to pay event-related expenses including personnel, equipment and materials and other related costs. Parkinq Fees ** a. Baseball Events Option to charge: $2.® per car; $15.® per bus b. Concerts and Option to charge: $3.® to $5.® per car; $5.® to Special Events $10.® VIP per car; $15.® per bus, depending on event c. Parking Lot Events Option to charge: $2.® to $5.® per car Concessions * a. Food and Beverage 20% of gross sales 10% for non-profit organizations b. Merchandise and 20% of gross sales to be negotiated Novelties (Books, Novelties, 10% for non-profit organizations Tapes, CD's, Programs, T-Shirts, etc.) Resolution No. 04-XXX Page 42 Miscellaneous a. Commercial Filming Minimum of $1,000.00 to $4,000.00 per day, depending on filming requirements, plus actual costs for City services b. Commercial Filming Minimum of $500.® to $2,000.® per day, in Parking Lot depending on filming requirements, plus actual costs for City services ¢. Commercial Photograph Minimum of $500.® to $2,000.® per day, depending on photography requirements, plus actual costs for City services d. Location Credit Required e. Deposit Minimum of $500.® to $2,500.oo per day, depending upon event/rental requirements. At the discretion of the Community Services Director, additional damage/security deposit may be required according to event/rental requirements and the City's liability exposure. f. Additional Move-in/ 50% of daily event rental rate Move-Out Days* g. Tent/Canopy Maintenance Minimum of $300.® to $1,000.00 per event Reserve Fee depending upon event/rental requirements. * Based upon the event proposed, the fees shown may be subject to negotiation. * Based on Provisions of Municipal Ordinance. ** Exception to Parking Rates apply to vehicles entitled to occupy the preferred parking area (Lot A) delineated in the lease with Valley Baseball Club, Inc. SECTION 1 1: RANCHO CUCAMONGA SHERIFF DEPARTMENT FEES Description Fe__~e Fingerprinting ..................................... $1 0.00 per card Criminal Reports ................................ $20.® Traffic Accident Reports .................... $20.00 Traffic Accident Reports - Mail .......... $20.® Criminal History Letters ..................... $1 5.® Bicycle License .................................. $3.® Special Event Jobs *. ......................... NO FEE Resolution No. 04-XXX Page 43 Costs Associated with Towing and Releasing Stored or Impounded Vehicles .......... $75.00 100.00 Repossession Vehicle Release Fee..$15.® Citation Proof of Correction **. .......... $15.® Copy of citation or other document - Not A Report ...................................... $5.® Deputy Reserve ................................. $31.~ 37.07 hourly Deputy II ............................................. $57.27 67.10 hourly Sergeant ............................................. $6~,.39 83.16 hourly * There is no fee for special events. However, if security services are required for the event such as regular or reserve officers, or private security, these fees are separate. ** This fee will not apply to persons residing or working within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or citations issued by the Rancho Cucamonga Police. SECTION 12: MISCELLANEOUS FEES Description Fee Calculation for 1915 Bond Act Assessment Districts ........................ $7.s° Amendment to Tax Statements for Prepaid Assessments ................. $20.® Resolution No. 04-XXX Page 44 Description Fe__e B,ngo L~cense ................................... $50. Industrial Bond Development Bond Application ............................... A fee of 1/4 of 1% of the established maximum amount of the proposed bond application and not less than $1,250.00 Dog Licensing .................................... (See Resolution 81-79) Filming Permits: (Note Fire and Police Department Fees) Application Fee (See Planning and Recreation Fees) ....................................................... $129.00 Basic Fee for each day of filming ..$132.~° Business ' 0o L~cense Tax ........................ $20. Investigation Fee ................................ $110.°° per filming day Fire Department ................................. $100.oo per hour * Massage Establishment Application .$225.® Renewal ............................................. $111 .oo Massage Outcall Service .................. $90.® Renewal ............................................. $45.o0 Massage Technician Application ...... $178.oo Renewal ............................................. $90.oo Mobile Home Park Rent Mediation Appeal Fee (per Section 8.08, Municipal Code) ...$300.® Mobile Home Park Rent Mediation Filing Fee (per Section 8.08, Municipal Code)...$15.oo Police Department** ........................ (See Rancho Cucamonga Sheriff Department Fees) School Fees ...................................... (See Ordinance Nos. 69-C and Ordinance No. 74 regarding these fees) Solicitor, Non-profit, Identification Badge ........................... $5.® each Resolution No. 04-XXX Page 45 Description Fee Taxicab Driver's Permit Application ,,$120.oo Renewal ............................................. $60.oo Taxicab Service Application ..............$95.® Renewal ............................................. $45.oo *Per Hour for each 3-man piece of equipment. Note Police and Fire Department Fees ** Number and type of personnel is determined by the Station Commander after reviewing plans for the event C. EFFECTIVE DATE: This Resolution shall become effective with its adoption. Please see the following page for formal adoption, certification and signatures Page 46 '~ The Table below displays the non-resident fee survey of other cities from April 2003 compared to April 2004 City April ! 2003 April 2004 No Fee Fee No Fee Fee Comments Burbank X X $6 Cerritos X X 50% of whatever Class registration fee Chino X X Chino Hills X X Hockey $10 per player Claremont X X Not for all program. Softball sign up $20, Soccer $10 per team and Playschool $5 Corona X X Not for all programs. Classes, camps and swim lessons $5 per person. Adult sports have resident and Sponsor priority but no extra fee. Corona constantly challenged by those with Corona address who are actually in the county. Fontana X X $5 per person fee no change in fee policy Irvine X X $5 per person for classes over $10 Manhattan Beach X X $4 per person per class. Adult sports have a flat team rate for non-resident teams. 2003 increased the fee to $6. Moreno Valley X X $5 fee per non-resident paxticipant. Ontario X X 25% of the program fee, not to exceed $6. Adult sports $6 per person. Rancho Cueamonga X X $5 per person. Applies to all programs. Rialto X X $5 fee per person. Riverside X X $10 per person per class Temecula X X $10 per person per class Upland X X $10 fee per player adult sports only Long Beach Considering recommending non-resident fee for their 2004/2005 budget Note: many of the above cities are considering implementing or increasing non-resident fees within their programs due to budget concerns. H:\ADMINISTR ATION~NON-RESIDENTFEE2004SUR VEYDOC Page 47 ,/~ SMALL ROOM FEE SURVEY OF SURROUNDING CITIES Cities Room Hr. Rates Am/Pm Deposit Maintenance Fee Security Building Square (Small Rms) Rates Attendant Footage Chino 550 - $12-$20 Rates do $50.00 for Carp 2~ which is City/Non $95.00-$225.00 $15 for $15 for all (909) 627- 700 depending on not Profit/Church/Community. $250 for Grp 3 which is depending on if rental both grps. 7577 how many change, commercial/private has kitchen use. people Claromont 650 $6-$7 pr hour Rates do $100.00 refundable deposit, Insurance varies but usually if $40.00 None $15 pr. hr. (909) 399- not needed would cost $83.32. Resident and Non-resident only 5460 change; used when renting a large hall, not small room. La Verne 600 $20-$450 Rates do $450 deposit for profit plus $100 advance payment or whole amount Included in fees stated Included Included in (909) 596- not of rental. Plus added insurance which is $83.32(Profit Gq:,) previously, in fees fees stated 8726 change, $75 first hour $30 ea. Addl. Hr. $450 refundable deposit also $83.32 stated previously. remain the added insurance; for apmx 20 people same group as above, previously Business and Nonpmfit $250 deposit, plus insurance $83.32, plus same. $100 advance payment or whole amount or rental. Aprox. smallest amount would range from $20-$40, plus each addl hr. $20. Montclair 550 $20 per session/ Rates do $25.00 Deposit None None $15 (909) 626- $30 with food not change 8571 served. Ontario 600 - $25.00/$45.00/ Rates do $25.00- $100.00 refundable deposit. (No Group) None None $10.00 per (909) 395- 800 I $65.00 not change hour 2000 depending on facility Pomona 550 - $90 I st hr $15 for Rates do $200.00 deposit which is refundable, unless terms of the None None $20.00 per (909) 620- 700 each addl. Hr. for not change contract is violated. Insurance fee also required, hour fee. 2311 resident. Non- resident $100 Ist hr and $20 for each addl. Hr. Riverside 600 - 700 Grp 2 (4 hrs) Rates do With out food useS75.00, with food use $150.00. None None Included in (909) 826- $44.00, Gnp 2 not change Grp I, Public schools, community/service organizations. Cap rental 5312 (2hrs) $22.00, II, non-profit. Grp III, private/commeroial/non- residents. Grp 3 (4hrs) $66.00, addl hrs. $5.00 San 550 - 700 $29.00 for small Rates do $300 damage deposit $75 Clean-up deposit None Included In Bemardino Rm for each not change Fee (909) 384- addl. Hr $9.30, 5211 Medium Rm. Is $32.50 for Ist hr and $9.75 for each addl. Hour. H:~ADMiNiSTRATIONXSMALLROOMFEERESOLS URVEY.DOC Page 48 Facility Room Rental Fee Survey Survey Date: December 10, 2003 Facility ! Address/Phone Weekday Cost M - F Friday after 5:00 pm & Minimal Comments 8:00 am - 10:00 pm Saturday/Sunday Cost Rental Hours Etiwanda Gardens 7576 Etiwanda Ave. $150/staff cost included $250/staff cost included 4 hours Cost same for all room rentals Rancho Cucamonga, CA regardless of room size (909)463 - 6687 Claremont Inn 555 W. Foothill Blvd. $795/staff cost included $2,500/staff cost included 8 hours Cost same for all room rentals Hotel & Conference Claremont, CA regardless of room size Center (909) 626-2411 Ramada Claremont 840 S. Indian Hill $150/staff cost included $250 4 hour Cost same for all room rentals Blvd. regardless of room size Claremont, CA (909) 62 Guasti Villa 2903 Guasti Road $1,000/staff cost included Friday dinner $2,500 5 hour (brunch 9 Additional hours cost M - F Guasti, CA Saturday lunch $2,500 - 2; lunch 10 - 3. $200; Sat. & Sun. $400; (909) 605-7677 Saturday dinner $3,000 dinner 6 - 11 or Cost same for all room rentals Sunday any $2,000 7pm - 12 am) regardless of room size Doubletree Hotel 222 N. Vineyard Ave. $275 - $5,000 depending on $275 - $5,000 depending on 4 hour Cost same for all room rentals Ontario, CA needs/staff cost i ncl uded needs/staff cost included regardless of room size (909) 937-0900 City of Ontario 303 East B. St/ $25 - $45 per hour/staff cost $25 - $45 per hour/staff 6 hour Cost same for all room rentals Ontario, CA included cost included regardless of room size (909) 395-2000 City of Pomona 505 Garey Ave. 250 occupants - $250 No cost for weekend Hourly rate 4 rooms available to rent fee Pomona, CA 100 occupants - $100 rentals/staff cost included based on occupants in room (909) 620-2311 90 occupants - $25/staff cost ! included City of Upland 460 N. Euclid Ave. $150/staff cost is $10 per $250/staff cost is $10 per 3 hour One room for rent room size is Upland, CA hour per staff hour per staff 2,300 sq. fl. (909) 931-4100 The Upland Arena 1721 W. 11t~ Street Price depends on meal plan Price depends on meal plan Hourly Upland, CA selected selected (909) 985-8236 H:L~DMINISTRATION~FACILITY ROOM RENTAL FEE SURVEY.DOC Page 49 Alcohol Damage/Security Deposit Fee Survey City Damage Cleaning If alcohol is Deposit allowed, what is the damage deposit? Claremont $100-$200 N/A Montclair $100-$200 $500 Cerritos $200-$600 Depends on how many sheriffs you have. Could be up to $100 per sheriff, plus a $500 deposit. Upland $100 No alcohol is permitted. Ontario $100 No alcohol is permitted. Yorba Linda $100-$600 No special deposit. Just pay for security guard, which they get on their own. Rialto $100-$200 No alcohol is permitted. Diamond Bar $500 No additional fee. Page 50 ~ ~ V PICNIC SHELTER CITY RATES CITY PHONE NUMBER RESIDENT FEE NON-RESIDENT FEE SHELTER SIZES Corona 909-736-2241 $30 for 3 hours $45 for 3 hours All shelters are the $10 each add'l hour $15 each add'l hour same price. Fontana 909-428-8360 $20 flat fee for the day $43 flat fee for the day All shelters are the same price. Fullerton 714-738-6575 $11 an hour $23.an hour Max of 50 people. Irvine 949-724-6620 up to 150ppi $27 an hour up to 150ppi $38 an hour $200 deposit 150-300ppi $31 an hour 150-300ppi $44 an hour ~;300 deposit 300-500ppi $49 an hour 300-500ppi $62 an hour ,$400 deposit Moreno Valley 909-413-3280 $1 O/day $20/day Small: 2 tables Large: 4-6 table~ Ontario 909-395-2020 Large $40/day Large $50/day Large: 2 tables w/BBQ Small $20/da~, Small $30/da~/ Small: 1 table w/BBQ Orange 714-834-2300 1-50ppi $50 an hour plus $50 deposit 1-50ppi $70 an hour plus $50 deposit They base everything o.n the 51-100ppl $75 an hour plus $75 deposit 51-100ppi $95 an hour plus $75 deposit number of people at the park. 101-200ppl $75 an hour plus $125 deposit 101-200ppl $145 an hour plus $125 deposit 2 hours minimum 200+ppi $200 an hour plus $200 deposit 200+ppi $220 an hour plus $200 deposit Pomona 909-620-2321 Pavilions (3 Sizes) Gazebos: Need insurance for groups 96ppi $40 for 4 hours 32-40ppl $20 for 4 hours over 100 people. 200ppi $80 for 4 hours ;50 refundable deposit Gazebos come w/3 BBQs 48ppi $20 for 4 hours ;10 for 4 hours of electricity Pavilions come with elect/sink Riverside 909-826-2000 up to 199ppi $32 for 4 hrs $8 ea. add'l hr up to 199ppi $53 for 4 hrs $13.25 ea. add'l hr There is also a cleaning 200-400ppi $64 for 4 hrs $16 ea. add'l hr 200-400ppi $106 for 4 hrs $26.50 ea. add'l hr deposit of $75 & reservation 401+ppi $96 for 4 hrs $24 ea. add'l hr 401+ppi $158 for 4 hrs $39.50 ea. add'l hr fee of $10. San Bernardino 909-384-5233 3-50 ppi $25 flat fee $75clean up/S300 damage They base everything on the 51-100 ppi $30 flat fee $150clean up/S500 damage number of people at the park. 101-200 ppi $50 flat fee $300clean up/$750 damage 201-500 ppi $75 flat fee $750clean up/S1,000 damage 501-1,000 ppi $125 flat fee $1,500clean up/S2,000 damage 1,000+ ppi $250 flat fee $3,000clean up/S5,000 dama~le Upland 909-931-4230 $11 for every 3 hours $11 for 3 hfs & $25 flat Most shelters hold 50 ppi currently increasing fees fee for being a non res. $25 deposit for key @ Ig.park West Covina I 626-939-8430 $75 flat fee for the day $150 flat fee for the day Shelters hold between I 20-100 people. Page 51 CURRENT PROPOSED PERCENT SERVICE DESCRIPTION FEE FEE CHANGE EXPLANATION COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH $75.00 $100,00 COSTS OF THIS SERVICE TOWING AND RELEASING OF HAVE INCREASED SINCE STORED OR IMPOUNDED THE INCEPTION OF THIS VEHICLES FEE. TO BRING THE DEPARTMENT IN LINE WITH OTHER LOCAL ' DEPARTMENTS SECURI1 Y, LAW RESERVE DEPUTY SHERIFF $31.06 HOURLY $37.07 HOURLY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT ENFORCEMENT INCREASE SECURITY, LAW DEPUTY SHERIFF $57.27 HOURLY $67.10 HOURLY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT ENFORCEMENT INCREASE SECURITY, LAW SERGEANT $64.38 HOURLY $83.16 HOURLY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT ENFORCEMENT INCREASE Police Related Fee Comparison 12/17/2003 Fee Rancho Cucamonga Ontario Upland Fontana City Chino Rialto Vehicle Release $75. X- $13q X $131 , $106 Report $20 .50 page $'15 TC $5 1-9 Pgs 0 Crime $7 Fatal TC $45 lOth pg $1 Traffic Res. $13 Crime $12 11->. 10 ea Traffic Non-Res. $26 Ink Prints $10 card $10 card $10 Res. Only X X $10 Livescan Fee $10 X X , X $17 X Citation Sign-off Resident 0 $10 $10 Res..0 $35 $18 Non-Resident $15 $20 Non. $12 Clearance Letter $15 0 $11 Immigration only $9 $31 $15 Repo Fee $15 0 -- $20 $9 $15 $15 Bicycle Lic. $3 X $4 $3 X VIN Verification X X Resident $15 X $26 $30 Non-Resident $30 Parking Permit X X X X 11 X X = Do Not Pr~)vide this Service Resolution No. 04-XXX Page 53 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 4th day of August, 2004. AYES: Alexander, Gutierrez, Howdyshell, Kurth, Williams NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAINED: None William J. Alexander, Mayor ATrEST: Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a Regular Meeting of said City Council held on this 4th day of August 2004. Executed this 4th day of August 2004, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk T H C I T Y 0 F ANCHO CUCAHONGA Slaff Report DATE: August 4, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam', AICP, City Manager FROM: Duane A. Baker, Assistant to the City Manager SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO VEHICULAR CRUISING, AND AMENDING THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached ordinance prohibiting cruising. Back.qround This new ordinance defines cruising as repetitive driving past a control point established by the Police Department within specified time period. The ordinance allows the Police Department to establish a control point in an area that has been designated by signs at the beginning and end as a "cruising control area". If a driver goes past the control point two or more times within a four hour period, the Police may issue a warning notice. After the warning has been issued, a driver may be cited for passing the control point during that four hour period. This ordinance is modeled after one in use in Ontario at Ontario Mills and is specifically authorized by California Vehicle Code Section 21100(k). The purpose of the ordinance is to cut down on traffic congestion caused by unnecessary cruising of the parking lots and roads of Victoria Gardens. This congestion increases chances for accidents and restricts access to Victoria Gardens by customers, employees and employers. The City and the Police Department have been working cooperatively with Forest City Development (the owners of Victoria Gardens) on establishing certain ordinances to enhance public safety at Victoria Gardens. The ordinance presented is part of that cooperative effort. Page 2 August 4, 2004 CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO VEHICULAR CRUISING, AND AMENDING THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE As this ordinance will help protect public safety and is being presented in cooperation with the property owner, it is the recommendation of the staff that this ordinance be approved. Respectfully submitted, Assistant to the City Manager ORDINANCE NO. 7_-~/ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ADOPTING REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO VEHICULAR CRUISING, AND AMENDING THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby ordains as follows: Section 1. Title 10 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended by the addition of a new Chapter 10.72 to read as follows: "Chapter 10.72 "CRUISING PROHIBITED Sections: 10.72.010 Cruising prohibited. 10.72.020 Definitions. 10.72.030 Establishment of traffic control points. 10.72.040 Issuance of warning notices. 10.72.050 Exceptions. 10.72.010. Cruising prohibited. No person shall engage in, or permit any vehicle registered to such person to engage in, cruising in any cruising control area. A violation of this Chapter is an infraction and shall be punishable as specified in Chapter 1.12 of this Code, or any successor provision thereto. 10.72.020. Definitions. For purposes of this Chapter, the following definitions shall apply: A. 'Cruising' shall mean the repetitive driving of a motor vehicle past a traffic control point in traffic that is congested at or near the traffic control point, as determined by the ranking peace officer on duty within the affected area, within a specified time period and after the vehicle operator has been issued a warning notice that further driving past the control point will be a violation of this Chapter. A vehicle shall be deemed to be in violation of this Chapter each time it passes a traffic control point prior to the designated permissible return time. Each such violation shall constitute a separate violation and no additional warning notice shall be required before issuance of subsequent citations may occur. B. 'Cruising control area' shall mean an area subject to cruising controls, clearly identified by signs at the beginning and end of the area that briefly and clearly state the appropriate provisions of California Vehicle Code § 21100(k) and the provisions of this Chapter. C. 'Traffic control point' shall mean a location within a cruising control area that is designated by the ranking peace officer on duty within the area, as a reference point for purposes of determining if a vehicle has engaged in cruising. 10.72.030. Establishment of traffic control points. The ranking peace officer on duty within any cruising control area may, upon determining that such area is adversely impacted by traffic congestion, establish and maintain one or more traffic control points for such area. 10.72.040. Issuance of warning notices, Any peace officer may issue a written warning notice to a driver and/or to each occupant legally capable of driving a motor vehicle, who is identified by such officer as having passed a particular traffic control point two or more times within a four-hour period, or such other period as determined to be appropriate by the ranking peace officer on duty within a cruising control area. The warning notice shall identify the street on which one or more traffic control points are located and shall generally state that further driving past the same traffic control point prior to the time specified therein shall constitute a violation of Chapter 10.72 of this Code and shall be punishable by a fine. 10.72.050. Exceptions. This section shall not apply to the following: A. Authorized emergency vehicles as defined in California Vehicle Code § 165. B. Vehicles owned by a public entity or public utility. C. Vehicles licensed for public transportation. D. Commercial vehicles while being driven for business purposes. E. Vehicles used to drop off or pick up any person whose residence or place of employment is located within a cruising control area provided, however, that such person must be able to present, satisfactory proof of residence or employment to a peace officer at a traffic control point within such cruising control area." Section2. Severability. The City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences and words of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this __ day of ., 2004. Mayor I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of ,2004, and was finally passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the __ day of ~, 2004, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBERS: ATTEST: City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga T H E C I T Y 0 F I~AN CiI 0 C IJ CAH 0 N GA Staff Report DATE: August 4, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Duane A. Baker, Assistant to the City Manager SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE FINDING AND DECLARING THAT DESIGNATED PRIVATE ROADS TO VICTORIA GARDENS, AND PARKING STRUCTURES THEREIN, SHALL BE SUBJECT TO SPECIFIC PROVISIONS OF THE CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached ordinance authorizing the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department to enforce the California Vehicle Code (C.V.C.) on the roads, parking lots and parking structures in Victoria Gardens. Back.qround C.V.C. Section 21107.6 and 21107.8 authorizes city councils to pass ordinances allowing local police departments to enforce the Vehicle Code on private roads serving commercial establishments and off-street parking facilities. The City Council must hold a public hearing, the notice for which must have been provided to the owners ten days prior to the hearing. The City and the Police Department have been working cooperatively with Forest City Development (the owners of Victoria Gardens) on establishing certain ordinances to enhance public safety at Victoria Gardens. The ordinances presented are part of that cooperative effort. Page 2 August 4, 2004 CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE FINDING AND DECLARING THAT DESIGNATED PRIVATE ROADS TO VICTORIA GARDENS, AND PARKING STRUCTURES THEREIN, SHALL BE SUBJECT TO SPECIFIC PROVISIONS OF THE CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE As this ordinance will help protect public safety and is being presented in cooperation with the property owner, it is the recommendation of the staff that this ordinance be approved. Resj~ectfully submitted, Duane A. Baker Assistant to the City Manager ORDINANCE NO. ~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FINDING AND DECLARING THAT DESIGNATED PRIVATE ROADS TO VICTORIA GARDENS, AND PARKING STRUCTURES THEREIN, SHALL BE SUBJECT TO SPECIFIC PROVISIONS OF THE CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE. A. Recitals. (i) California Vehicle Code § 21107.6 authorizes the City, by ordinance, to make provisions of the California Vehicle Code applicable to private roads that serve commercial establishments, following a public hearing and pdor written notice to the owner of such road. (ii) California Vehicle Code § 21107.8 authorizes the City, by ordinance or resolution, to make specified provisions of the California Vehicle Code applicable to privately owned and maintained off-street parking facilities following a public hearing and prior written notice to the owner and operator of any such off-street parking facility. (iii) In accordance with the authorities referred to in Recitals (i) and (ii), above, the City Council desires to make provisions of the California Vehicle Code applicable to certain private roads and off-street parking facilities serving Victoria Gardens, a private commercial establishment, as specified in this Ordinance. (iv) On March 17, 2004, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing concerning the adoption of this Ordinance. Prior written notice was provided to the owner(s) of the affected private roads, and owner(s) and operator(s) of the affected off-street parking facilities, as required by law. (v) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby ordains as follows: Section 1. All facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. Section 2. Upon the effective date of this Ordinance, all provisions of the California Vehicle Code shall be applicable to those private roads serving Victoria Gardens, as are depicted in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. Section 3. Upon the effective date of this Ordinance, §§ 22350, 23103, and 23109, and the provisions of Division 16.5 (commencing with § 38000), of the California Vehicle Code shall apply to those privately owned and maintained off- street parking facilities serving Victoria Gardens, as are depicted in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Section 4. The provisions of this Ordinance shall not become effective as to privately maintained off-street parking facilities unless and until a sign has been posted in a conspicuous place at each entrance to each affected parking facility, that is not less than 17 x 22 inches in size, with lettering not less than one inch in height, stating, in effect, that the off-street parking facility is subject to public traffic regulations and control. Section 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this __ day of ,2004. Mayor I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the __ day of ., 2004, and was finally passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the __ day of ., 2004, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBERS: ATTEST: City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Victoria Gardens Site Plan Rancho Cucamonga, California Illustrative Site Plan %~, ~ 2~,il2003 Victoria Gardens-C, LLC ~ ci of Ranc. Cuca~nga ......... (90~ 4~-2700 VICTORIA T H C I T Y 0 F RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE: August 4, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Duane A. Baker, Assistant to the City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST BY THE FREEDOM'S FLAME MEMORIAL FOUNDATION TO USE FIRE STATION 174 FOR A 9/11 MEMORIAL EVENT The City has received the attached letter from the Freedom's Flame Memorial Foundation (the Foundation) requesting to use Fire Station 174 for a 9/11 Memorial event. The event is planned for the morning on Saturday, September 11, 2004. Specifically, the Foundation would like to access Station 174 in the morning around 6:30 a.m. for set-up, with a formal ceremony to take place at 8:30 a.m. The formal ceremony would conclude at approximately 10:00 a.m. After the ceremony, a group of 50 - 100 Harley Davidsons will arrive to escort the truck carrying the World Trade Center steel to a concert being held in Corona. The Foundation will be inviting members of local law enforcement and fire agencies to attend the event. They are also requesting fire apparatus from surrounding communities to be on hand for static display. Local elected officials will be invited to the event along with members of the general public. The Foundation estimates that no more than 300 people will be at the Station for the event at any one time during the morning. Logistically the Foundation is asking for use of the Station for the ceremony, to park the truck carrying the World Trade Center steel and for use of a public address system and podium. There is no rental fee for the Fire Station and we don't anticipate that additional City staff will have to be on hand to assist with the event. The public address system and podium are available at the Station. The podium belongs to the City and the public address system belongs to the Firefighters Association. Chief Ortiz does not feel that Police traffic control will be needed for the event. Based on the information presented to the City in the attached letter and through subsequent phone conversations with the Foundation chair it appears that there will Page 2 August 4, 2004 REQUEST BY THE FREEDOM'S FLAME MEMORIAL FOUNDATION TO USE FIRE STATION 174 FOR A 9/11 MEMORIAL EVENT be no direct cost to the City. Based on this information, the City Council needs to consider if wants to grant this request by the Freedom's Flame memorial Foundation to use Fire Station 174 for a 9/11 Memorial event. Assistant to the City Manager attachment July 27, 2004 Duane Baker PO Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91729-0807 Dear Sir: On behalf o£Freedom's Flame Foundation, America's 9/11 Memorial, I am requesting the use of the Jersey Fire Station on Saturday, September 11, 2004. Our use would begin in the morning and be finished by noon. The event is the second annual 9/11Memorial Recognition. Last year the event was held on September 11, 2003 at the Filippi Winery with no problems experienced. Most of the participants in the event are either law enforcement personnel', fire fighting personnel or their families and supporters. We would of course be honored if the City Council would attend. The event would include firefighter and law enforcement representatives from various agencies and the public would be invited. At the conclusion of the ceremony which would last from approximately 8:30 AM until 10:00AM, we will depart the station and move to the City of Corona £or a concert that is being co-sponsored by K-FROG Radio and Harley Davidson. We expect to be escorted at the time of our departure from Rancho Cucamonga by a group of Harley riders who will accompany us to the concert. We will be joined at the concert venue by several thousand riders from all over Southem Califomia. The Freedom's Flame Ride is the third annual and is sponsored by Full Throttle Magazine. The first Ride terminated at the Nixon Presidential Library and the second Ride terminated at Filippi's Winery last year. We are also asking that the City waive any fees. We believe that the event is Omportant to the community and the city. It is part of the beginning of the P.O.BOX 1239 · RANCHO CUCAJV~ONGA, CA · 91729-12.39 ~'~ PHONE · TOLL FREE · 866-44 NY 2 CA (866-446-9222) www,freedomsflame.us efforts to place a 9/11 Memorial in Central Park. When tragedy such as 9/11 occurs, it is critical that we do not forget those who lost their lives. Hundreds of firefighters, police officers, paramedics and civilians exhibited extraordinary bravery that day. The fact that they faced personal danger and responded to it with courage instead of fear is an important message to send to the terrorists who would attempt something like this in the future. America was reforged in "Freedom's Flame" that day. Would you please request formal approval by the City Council? ,~lo~k you and the City Council for consideration. Dennis L. Stout, Chair TH E C I T Y 0 F I~AN C H 0 C[J CAH 0 N CA Staff Report TO: Mayor and Membem of the City Coundl. / '%/ FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager~_~_.._~. BY: Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk DATE: August 4, 2004 SUBJECT: DESIGNATION OF A VOTING REPRESENTATIVE AND AN ALTERNATE FOR THE LEAGUE OF CITIES ANNUAL MEETINR RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council designate a voting representative and an alternate who can be present at the Business Session of the Annual League Meeting to be held on Sunday, September 19, at 10:15 a.m. at the Long Beach Convention Center. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS This year's Annual League Meeting is scheduled for Friday, September 17 through Sunday, September 19, in Long Beach. At the Business Session, which is to take place on Sunday, September 19, at 10:15 a.m., the membership will be taking action on conference resolutions which will guide cities and the League in an effort to improve the quality, responsiveness and vitality of local government within the State of California. The League is requesting each City designate a voting representative and an alternate to be present at the Business Session to vote on matters affecting municipal and/or League policy. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. City Manager Attachment 1400 K S'iRLi;'r 602 East l-luntington Dr., Ste. C · OF CALIFORNIA S^c~Mv:~41o, CA 95814 Monrovia, CA 91016 PH:(gl6) 658 82{10 ,,.:(626) 80 .3 5 C I T I E S vx: (916) 658-8240 Fx: (626) 305-1345 RECEIVED " JUL 1 2 200 OF CHO CLERK June 30, 2004 To: The Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Ron Loveridge, League President, Mayor, Riverside Re: Designation of Voting Delegate for 2004 League Annual Conference The League's 2004 Annual Conference is scheduled for Friday, September 17 throuqh Sunday, September 19 in Lonq Beach. One very important aspect of the annual conference is the annual business meeting where the membership takes action on conference resolutions. Annual conference resolutions guide cities and the League in our efforts to improve the quality, responsiveness and vitality of local government in California. It is important that al..~l cities be represented at the Annual Business Meeting on Sunday, September 19, at 10:15 a.m. at the Long Beach Convention Center. To expedite the conduct of business at this important policy-making meeting, each city council should designate a voting representative and an alternate who will be registered at the conference and present at the Annual Business Meeting. A voting card will be given to the city official that is designated and indicated on the enclosed "Voting Delegate Form." Please complete and return the enclosed form to the League's Sacramento office at the earliest possible time (not later than Friday, August 20, 2004), so that proper records may be established for the conference. The city's designated voting delegate may pick up the city's voting card at the Voting Card desk located in the League registration area. The Desk will be open on September 17, 18, and 19. Voting cards should be picked up before the Annual Business Meeting on September 19. The voting procedures to be followed at this conference are printed on the reverse side of this memo. Your help in returning the attached '~/oting Delegate Form" as soon as possible is appreciated. If you have any questions, please call Lorraine Okabe at (916) 658-8236. LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES Annual Conference Voting Procedures 1. Each member city has a right to cast one vote on matters pertaining to League policy. 2. To cast the city's vote, a city official must have in his or her possession the city's voting card and be registered with the Credentials Committee. 3. Prior to the Annual Conference, each city should designate a voting delegate and an alternate and return the Voting Delegate Form to the League Credentials Committee. 4. The voting delegate, or alternate, may pick up the city's voting card at the voting card desk in the conference registration area. 5. Free exchange of the voting card between the voting delegate and alternate is permitted. 6. If neither the voting delegate nor alternate is able to attend the Business Meeting, the voting delegate or alternate may pass the voting card to another official from the same city by appearing in person before a representative of the Credentials Committee to make the exchange. Prior to the Business Meeting, exchanges may be made at the "Voting Card" table in the League Registration Area. At the Business Meeting, exchanges may be made at the '¥oting Card" table in the front of the meeting room. Exchanges may not be made while a roll call vote is in progress because the Credentials Committee will be conducting the roll call. 7. Qualification of an initiative resolution is judged in part by the validity of signatures. Only the signatures of city officials who are authorized to use the city's voting card, and who have left a sample of their signature on file for the Credentials Committee, will be approved. 8. In case of dispute, the Credentials Committee will determine the right of a city official to vote at the Business Meeting. 0