HomeMy WebLinkAbout2004/08/18 - Agenda Packet 10500 Civic Center Drive + Rancho Cucamonga, GA 91730-:380'1
-~GENDAS
m Ci%y Co nci
]]¢~EGULAR I~EETINGS
1St and 3rd Wednesdays + 7:00 p.m.
AGENCY~ ]~OARD & CITY COUNCIL 1M[EMBERS
William J. Alexander .................... Mayor
Diane Williams ............... Mayor Pro Tern
Rex Gutierrez ............................ Member
Robert J. Howdyshell ............... Member
Donald J. Kurth, M.D ................ Member
Jack Lam ......................... City Manager
James L. Markman ............. City Attorney
Debra J. Adams ..................... City Clerk
~I~R~ER OF ~US[NESS
5:30 p.m. Closed Session .................... Tapia Congerence Room
7:00 p.m. Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting... Council Chambers
Regular Fire Protection District Meeting ... Counc# Chambers
Regular City Council Meeting ............. Council Chambers
INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC
~.~NCHO
~,~UGAMONGA
TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL
The City Council encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length
of the Agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply
indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your
entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping,
booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience.
The public may address the City Council on any agenda item. Please sign in on the clipboard located at the desk
behind the staff table. It is important to list your name, address and phone number. Comments are generally
limited to 5 minutes per individual.
If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under "Public Communications". There
is opportunity to speak under this section at the beginning and the end of the agenda.
Any handouts for the City Council should be given to the City Clerk for distribution.
To address the City Council, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your
name for the record and speak into the microphone.
All items to be placed on a City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00
p.m. on Tuesday, one week prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's office receives all such items.
AGENDA BACK-UP MATERIALS
Staff reports and back-up materials for agenda items are available for review at the City Clerk's counter and the
Public Library. A complete copy of the agenda is also available at the sign in desk located behind the staff table
during the Council meeting.
LIVE BROADCAST.
Council meetings are broadcast live on Channel 3 for those with cable television access. Meetings are
rebroadcast on the second and fourth Wednesdays of each month at 11:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. The City has
added the option for customers without cable access to view the meetings "on-demand" from their computers.
The added feature of "Streaming Video On Demand" is available on the City's website at www.ci.rancho-
cucamonga.ca.uslwhatsnew.htm for those with Hi-bandwidth (DSL/Cable Modem) or Low-bandwidth (Dial-up)
Internet service.
The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the
Council Chambers Located at 10500 Civic Center Drive.
Members of the City Council also sit as the Redevelopment Agency and the Fire District Board.
Copies of City Council agendas and minutes can be found at http:llwww, ci. rancho-cucamonga, ca. us
If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please
contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477-2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the
meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility.
Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. -
Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session.
~ CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
AUGUST 18, 2004 - 7:00 P.M.
THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS~ CITY 1
cRANcHO HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
1. Roll Call: Alexander_, Gutierrez__,
Howdyshell__, Kurth__, and Williams__.
II B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
II C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS I
This is the time and place for the general public to address the City
Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any
issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may
receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.
Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual.
II D. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS [
This is the time and place for reports to be made by members of the
City Council on matters not on the agenda.
l[ E. CONSENT CALENDAR
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and
non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time
without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember
or member of the audience for discussion.
1. Approval of Minutes: July 7, 2004
July 21, 2004
July 26, 2004 (Special Meeting)
2. Approval of Warrants, Register July 27 through August 10, 2004, and 1
Payroll ending August 10, 2004, for the total amount of
$5,369,748.(;9.
3. Approve to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of July 31, 26
2004.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
AUGUST 18, 2004 - 7:00 P.M.
THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY 2
{..~,~'~CHO HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
UCAMONGA
4. Approval of an appropriation of $1,001,822 to Capital Reserve Acct. 32
No. 10250015300 for the Environmental Review and Construction of
the Emergency Erosion Control Projects necessary in the wake of the
Grand Prix Fire, to be funded from Reserve Fund Balance.
5. Approval to award designated contracts to the specified sub- 38
contractors, for the construction of the Rancho Cucamonga Cultural
Center Project, totaling $22,052,625 and authorize the expenditure of
a 5% contingency for each contract, totaling $1,102,631 to be funded
from the following sources: RDA 2001 Tax Allocation Bonds Account
No. 2650801-5650/1357650-6314 ($3,176,850); RDA 2004 Tax
Allocation Bonds Account No. 2656801-5650/1357660-6314
($7,932,535); State Library Grant Funds Account No. 1310602-
5650/1357310-6314 ($5,382,087); City Community Development
Block Grant Funds Account No. 1204314-5650/1388204-6314
($464,064); County Community Development Block Grant Funds
Account No. 1205301-5650/1357205-6314 ($500,000); and Forest
City Participation Funds Account No. 1615303-5650/1357615-6314
($5,699,620); and authorize the appropriation of $3,176,850 into
Account No. 2650801-5650/13575650-6314; $7,932,535 into Account
No. 2660801-5650/1357660-6314; $2,428,937 into Account No.
1310602-5650/1357310-6314; $67,994 into Account No.1204314-
5650/1388204-6314; and $500,000 into Account No. 1205301-
5650/1357205-6314.
6. Approval of a contract amendment (CO 03-090) adjusting the hourly 42
rate for inspection services provided by Associated Engineers, Inc.
7. Approval of Payment Agreement by and among the Ontario
Redevelopment Agency (CO 04-108) and the City of Rancho 44
Cucamonga regarding installation of public improvements along 4th
Street between Haven Avenue and Milliken Avenue, funds to be
appropriated from Transportation and Beautification in fiscal year
2005/06.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-262 46
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PAYMENT
AGREEMENT BY AND AMONG THE ONTARIO
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGARDING
INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
ALONG 4TM STREET BETVVEEN HAVEN
AVENUE AND MILLIKEN AVENUE
8. Approval of Reimbursement Agreement by and among the Ontario
Redevelopment Agency, the City of Rancho Cucamonga and 48
Jefferson On Fourth, LP. (CO 04-109) regarding installation of 60'
storm drain and other related improvements with no City funds
involved for Parcel map 16245, located north of 4th Street, west of
Milliken Avenue, submitted by Jefferson On Fourth, L.P.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
AUGUST 18, 2004 - 7:00 P.M.
THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY 3
~,RANcHO HALL, 10500 Civic CENTER DRIVE
I.~AMOlqGA
RESOLUTION NO. 04-263
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING REIMBURSEMENT
AGREEMENT BY AND AMONG THE ONTARIO
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, THE CiTY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND JEFFERSON
ON FOURTH, · L.P. REGARDING
INSTALLATION OF 60" STORM DRAIN AND
OTHER RELATED IMPROVEMENTS WITH NO
CITY FUNDS INVOLVED FOR PARCEL MAP
16245
9. Approval to authorize the execution of a Professional Services 52
Agreement in the amount of $166,100.00 to Butsko Utility Design, Inc.
(CO 04-110), for system planning and design of Stadium Business
Park and Rochester Business Park and continued technical electrical
engineering support within the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility
service area to fund $28,700 from 17053035650/1489705-6310,
$37,400 from 17053035650/1488705-6310 and $100,000 from
17053035309.
10. Approval of a contract between the County of San Bernardino (CO 04-
111) and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for $500,000 in County 55
Community Development Block Grant funds for the construction of the
Victoria Gardens Cultural Center and authorization to accept these
funds and appropriate the $500,000 into Account No. 1205000-4740.
11. Approval to authorize the execution of a Professional Services
Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Pouk &
Steinle, Inc, (CO 04-112) for operations and maintenance services for 57
the City's Municipal Utility Substation and Distribution System not to
exceed $510,000.00, to be funded from Account Ne.17053035309.
12. Approval of an agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga
and Rancho Cucamonga/Fontana YMCA (CO 04-113) for use of the 59
Central Park Facility.
13. Approval to execute contract renewals (CO 90-145, 89-136, 93-006)
with Mariposa Horticultural Enterprises, Inc., of Irwindale, California, 7'1
for the maintenance of City parks and landscape sites, in the amount
of $1,300,800 to be funded from 1001312-5304 ($7,200), 1001316-
5300 ($420,680), 1008316-5300 ($73,870), 1110316-5650/1481110-0
($4,000), 1110316-5650/1119110-0 ($35,000), 1130303-5300
($226,883), 1131303-5300 ($74,321), 1132303-5300 ($2,150),
1133303-5300 ($302,820), 1134303-5300 ($124,876), 1137303-5300
($17,000) and 1140303-5300 ($12,000) for fiscal year 2004-2005.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
AUGUST 18, 2004 - 7:00 P.M.
THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY
(~NCHO HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
UCAMONG~
14. Approval to execute contract renewals (CO 92-011) with Trugreen 72
Landcare (formerly Golden Bear Arborists) of Monrovia, California, for
the maintenance of City trees, in the amount not to exceed $477,100
to be funded from 1001316-5300 ($48,690), 1130303-5300
($184,210), 1131303-5300 ($1,050), 1133303-5300 ($500), 1134303-
5300 ($150), 1136303-5300 ($300), 1137303-5300 ($350), 1130303-
5310 ($51,300), 1131303-5310 ($62,500), 1133303-5310 ($37,000),
1134303-5310 ($13,900), 1136303-5310 ($26,450), 1137303-5310
($13,650), 1138303-5310 ($20,000), 1139303-5310 ($2,100),
1140303-5310 ($2,350), 1848303-5310 ($12,600) as approved in the
fiscal year 2004-2005 budget.
15. Approval to execute contract renewals (CO 90-143, 90-144, 93-041, 73
93-080, 02-018) with Trugreen Landcare of Anaheim, California, for
the maintenance of various landscape sites Citywide, in the amount
not to exceed $2,350,913 to be funded from 1110303-5300 ($27,600),
1130303-5300) ($368,400), 1131303-5300 ($1,014,993), 1134303-
5300 ($319,220), 1135303-5300 ($1,890), 1136303-5300 ($244,100),
1137303-5300 ($245,070), 1138303-5300 ($24,500), 1139303-5300
($19,600), and 1140303-5300 ($85,540) for fiscal year 2004-2005.
16. Approval of renewal of a Professional Services Agreement for fiscal
year 2004/05 with Social Vocational Services (CO 03-102) for weekly 74
park litter and trash pick-up in the amount of $43,500 with an option to.
renew for additional one year periods upon review and confirmation of
pricing and mutual consent, allowing yearly increases based on the
June Consumer Price Index (CPI) and increases for additional parks,
to be funded from Landscape Maintenance District Accounts
1130303-5300 ($4,800), 1131303-5300 ($14,550), 1134303-5300
($14,550), 1137303-5300 ($3,600), 1140303-5300 ($3,600) and
General Fund Account 1001316-5300 ($2,400).
17. Approval of a Master Plan Transportation Facility Reimbursement
Agreement for construction of traffic signal at the intersection of 76
Banyan Street and Etiwanda Avenue in connection with development
of Tract 16147, submitted by Pacific Crest Communities, Inc., to be
funded from Transportation Reimbursement Account No,
11243035650/1026124-0.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-264 78
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A MASTER PLAN
TRANSPORTATION FACILITY REIMBURSE-
MENT AGREEMENT FOR THE INSTALLATION
OF A TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT THE
INTERSECTION OF BANYAN STREET AND
ETIWANDA AVENUE
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
AUGUST 18, 2004 - 7:00 P.M.
THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY
I .,~fCHO HALL, 10500 Civic CENTER DRIVE
[ ;UCAMONGA
18. Approval of Improvement Agreement Supplement and Security for 79
Tract No. 16370, located on the northwest corner of Church Street
and Arbor Lane submitted by Standard PacificNictoria Arbors LLC.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-265 80
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT SUPPLEMENT AND SECURITY
FOR TRACT NO. 16370
19. Approval to accept improvements, release the Faithful Performance 8'1
Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond and File a Notice of Completion for
improvements for Tract 14497, located on the west side of Bluegrass
Avenue south of Wilson Avenue, submitted by Standard Pacific
Corporation.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-266 84
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
iMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 14497 AND
AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
20. Approval to accept the Arrow Route Pavement Rehabilitation from 85
Haven Avenue to Milliken Avenue, Contract No. 04-001, as complete,
retain the Faithful Performance Bond as a Guarantee Bond, release
Labor and Material Bond and authorize the City Engineer to file a
Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of
$269,946.94.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-267 88
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE ARROW
ROUTE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM
HAVEN AVENUE TO MILLIKEN AVENUE,
CONTRACT NO. 04-001 AND AUTHORIZING
THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION
FOR THE WORK
21. Approval to release Faithful Performance Bond No. 6024485 in the 89
amount of $453,272.17, for the East Avenue Street improvements
rd
from Banyan Street to north of 23 Street, Contract No. 03-018.
22. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and 91
Monumentation Cash Deposit for Tract 16335, located on the east
side of East Avenue, north of Base Line Road, submitted by KB Home
Greater Los Angeles, Inc., and release of previously submitted
Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and
Monumentation Cash Deposit accepted by City Council on December
3, 2003, from APHRCK, LLC.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
AUGUST 18, 2004 - 7:00 P.M.
THE MEETING TO BE H~'LD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY 6
(.~,~CHO HALL, 10500 Civic CENTER DRIVE
L'C~MONGA
RESOLUTION NO. 04-268 94
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES
AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT FOR
TRACT 16335 AND RELEASING THE
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT,
IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND
MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT
PREVIOUSLY ACCEPTED BY CITY COUNCIL
ON DECEMBER 3, 2003
23. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security and 95
Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1
and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 for DRC2002-
00018 located at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Alta
Loma Drive submitted by Panorama Development.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-269 97
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITIES FOR DRC2002-00018
RESOLUTION NO. 04-270 98
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION
OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. '1 AND
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR DRC2002-00018
24. Approval to accept the Beryl Community Trail from Hillside Road to 106
north of Almond Street, Contract No. 04-022, as complete, retain the
Faithful Performance Bond as a Guarantee Bond, release Labor and
Material Bond and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of
Completion and approve the final contract amount of $80,550.29.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-271 109
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE BERYL
COMMUNITY TRAIL FROM HILLSIDE ROAD
TO NORTH OF ALMOND STREET,
CONTRACT NO. 04-022 AND AUTHORIZING
THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION
FOR THE WORK
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
AUGUST 18, 2004 - 7:00 P.M.
THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY 7
{~,RANCHO HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
UCAMONGA
The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first
reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non-
controversial. The Council will act upon them at one time without
discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be
removed for discussion.
1. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING REGULATIONS
APPLICABLE TO VEHICULAR CRUISING, AND AMENDING THE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE
ORDINANCE NO. 731 (second reading) 1 10
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING REGULATIONS
APPLICABLE TO VEHICULAR CRUISING,
AND AMENDING THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MUNICIPAL CODE
2. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE FINDING AND DECLARING
THAT DESIGNATED PRIVATE ROADS TO VICTORIA GARDENS1
AND PARKING STRUCTURES THEREIN, SHALL BE SUBJECT TO
SPECIFIC PROVISIONS OF THE CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE
ORDINANCE NO. 732 (second reading) 112
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, FINDING AND DECLARING
THAT DESIGNATED PRIVATE ROADS TO
VICTORIA GARDENS, AND PARKING
STRUCTURES THEREIN, SHALL BE
SUBJECT TO SPECIFIC PROVISIONS OF THE
CALIFORNIA VEHICULAR CODE
G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public
hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to
receive public testimony.
No items submitted.
, CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
AUGUST 18, 2004 - 7:00 P.M.
THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY 8
R~c.o HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
CUCAMONG^
II H. PUBLIC HEARINGS I
The following items have no legal publication or posting
requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public
testimony.
1. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE TO REVISE REGULATIONS 115
PERTAINING TO NUISANCE ABATEMENT, AMENDING TITLE 8 OF
THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE, AND
DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF RELATED TO STAGNANT
WATER
ORDINANCE NO. 733 (first reading) 117
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, REVISING REGULATIONS
PERTAINING TO NUISANCE ABATEMENT,
AMENDING TITLE 8 OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE, AND
DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF
2. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE REVISING REGULATIONS 119
PERTAINING TO POSSESSION AND CONSUMPTION OF
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES WITHIN CITY PARKS, AND AMENDING
TITLE 12 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE
ORDINANCE NO, 734 (first reading) 121
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, REVISING REGULATIONS
PERTAINING TO POSSESSION AND
CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC
BEVERAGES WITHIN CITY PARKS, AND
AMENDING TITLE 12 OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE
I[ I. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS I
The following items do not legally require any publie testimony,
although the Chair may open the meeting for public input.
1. CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL OF HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW 124
DRC2003-00961 - LYNNE AND RENEE MASSEY (CONTINUED
FROM JULY 21, 2004)
, CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
AUGUST 18, 2004 - 7:00 P.M.
THE MEET~N(~ ;O BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, C~TY 9
~RANcHO HALL, i 0500 Civic CENTER DRIVE
UCAMONGA
RESOLUTION NO. 04-272 178
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, UPHOLDING THE ACTION OF
THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND
APPROVING HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT
REVIEW DRC2003-00961, A REQUEST TO
CONSTRUCT A 3,628 SQUARE FOOT
SINGLE-FAMILY HOME ON LOT 12 OF TRACT
10035 IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DiSTRiCT
(2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED
AT 8045 CAMINO PREDERA; AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN:
0207-631-02
The following items have been requested by the City Council for
discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair
may open the meeting for public input.
1. PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES '181
UPDATE
I(. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR THE NEXT
MEETING
This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to
discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this
meeting, only identified for the next meeting.
Il PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS I
This is the time and place for the general public to address the City
Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any
issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Council may
receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.
Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual.
I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my
designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing
agenda was posted on August 12, 2004, seventy-two (72) hours prior
to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center
Drive.
July 7, 2004
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION MINUTES
II ^. OP.D I
The Rancho Cucamonga City Council held a closed session on Wednesday, July 7, 2004, in the Tapia
Room of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The
meeting was called to order at 5:30 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander.
Present were Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, Robert J. Howdyshell, Donald J. Kurth, M.D., Diane
Williams and Mayor William J. Alexander.
Also present were: Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Larry Temple,
Administrative Services Director; and George Rivera, Administrative Services Manager.
II B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) I
Mayor Alexander announced the closed session item.
B1. LABOR NEGOTIATIONS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6 TO GIVE GEORGE
RIVERA, ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES MANAGER; PAMELA EASTER, DEPUTY CITY MANAGER;
AND LARRY TEMPLE, ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR, DIRECTION IN REGARDS TO THE
MEET AND CONFER PROCESS - CITY
Il C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) I
No communication was made on the closed session item.
Il D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION I
The closed session began at 5:30 p.m.
II E. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS ]
The closed session recessed at 6:54 p.m. with no action taken.
City Council Minutes
July 7, 2004
Page 2
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Regular Meetinq
A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, July 7, 2004, in the
Council Chambers of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga,
California. Mayor William J. Alexander called the meeting to order at 7:08 p.m.
Present were Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, Robert J. Howdyshell, Donald J. Kurth, M.D., Diane
Williams and Mayor William J. Alexander.
Also present were: Pam Easter, Deputy City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Linda D. Daniels,
RDA Director; Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director; Dawn Haddon, Purchasing Manager; Sid
Siphomsay, Information Systems Analyst; Michael Toy, Information Systems Specialist; Jon Gillespie,
Traffic Engineer; Mike TenEyck, Administrative Resource Manager; Brad Buller, City Planner; Alan
Warren, Assistant Planner; Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director; Dave Moore, Recreation
Superintendent; Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III; Francie Palmer, Marketing Manager; Deborah
Clark, Library Director; Captain Pete Odiz, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; Chief Peter Bryan,
Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager; Michelle
Dawson, Management Analyst Ilk Kimberly Thomas, Management Analyst II; Kathy Scott, Deputy City
Clerk; and Shirr'l Griffin, Office Specialist II.
II .. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS I
B1. Presentation of a Proclamation to Sunrise Life Development for their contributions to the community
by operating the job center at no cost to the City.
Mayor Alexander presented the Proclamation to Art Lucero of Sunrise Life Development.
Mr. Lucero said this is a privilege to be of service to the community. He said this is a "win-win" solution
for the City in that the business owners who are there and want to conduct business, we help to protect
them so that their customers aren't harassed; and, it's a win for the businesses because their sales
increase due to returning customers. He said it is also a blessing to the Police Department, as they don't
get as many calls, and the day laborers themselves have an opportunity to find some gainful employment.
II c. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS [
C1. Earle Anderson regarding building the extension of the existing flood control channel before the next
rainy season - Bella Vista project.
C2. Sharon Mofff regarding Bella Vista project.
C3. Scott Motif regarding Bella Vista project.
C4. Eniko Wills regarding Bella Vista project.
City Council Minutes
July 7, 2004
Page 3
Councilmember Gutierrez stated that at the next meeting staff would provide an update on the status of
the Bella Vista project.
C5. Nicole Myerchin regarding the need for foster parents at the animal shelter, compliance to the
Hayden Law, and thanks to City Council for submitting application in regards to the transportation
program.
C6. Nacho Gracia, Northtown Housing Development Corp., re the grand opening of the Olen Jones
Senior Community Complex.
C7. John Lyons re 4th of July Celebration and upcoming election.
C8. Kevin Hoyt re City's support of the Freedom's Flame - September 11 th Memorial.
D. CouNciL COMMUNICATIONS
D1. Kurth regarding the West Nile Virus and efforts to rid of standing water and places for mosquitoes to
breed; the success of the 4th of July Celebration; emphasis on keeping an eye on children around
swimming pools; the fact that Fire Station No. 176 is now in service protecting the citizens.
D2. Gutierrez regarding the success of the 4th of July Celebration. He heard positive comments on the
ingress and egress and hopes there's a way of accommodating more people in the future.
DS. Williams regarding the success of the 4th of July Celebration. She commended staff on a fabulous
job; the successful June 19th demonstration of the California Discovery Gardens at the Maloof Foundation
compound.
D4. Howdyshell regarding the success of the 4th of July Celebration and concerns with illegal fireworks.
II ~. CONSENT CALENDAR I
El. Approval of Minutes: May 27, 2004
May 27, 2004 (Special Study Session)
June 2, 2004
June 3, 2004 (Special Study Session - Gutierrez absent)
June 14, 2004 (Special Meeting)
E2. Approval of Warrants, Register June 8 through June 29, 2004, and Payroll ending June 29, 2004, for
the total amount of $5,919,646.16.
E3. Approval for the acceptance of the Additive Alternate Bid for the Central Park Community Center
kitchen equipment with Douglas E. Barnhart, Inc., in the amount of $55,000.
E4. Approval of a Resolution supporting the Local Government Budget Package as negotiated between
Governor Schwarzenegger and cities, counties, and special districts.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-213
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING THE LOCAL
City Council Minutes
July 7, 2004
Page 4
GOVERNMENT BUDGET PACKAGE AS NEGOTIATED BETWEEN
GOVERNOR SCHWARZENEGGER AND CITIES, COUNTIES, AND
SPECIAL DISTRICTS
E5. Approval of IBM hardware and software maintenance agreements with IBM for fiscal year 2004/2005
in the amount of $56,403 from Acct. No. 1001-209-5300.
E6. Approval for the purchase of two (2) Ford F-250 Heavy Duty Super Cab trucks with utility body and
one (1) Ford F-350 DRW Super Duty stake bed truck for Engineering Department, Parks and Facilities
Divisions, at Central Park, from Sunrise Ford of Fontana, in the amount of $79,406.12 and an
appropriation of $79,406.12 from the Park Development Fund balance into Fund 1120-305-5604.
E7. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security, Drainage Acceptance Agreement and
Maintenance Agreement for Installation of the Orphan Flow Drainage System for Tentative Tract 14759,
located at Wardman Bullock Road and the future Wilson Avenue, submitted by Pulte Homes.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-214
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT' SECURITY, DRAINAGE
ACCEPTANCE AGREEMENT AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR
TENTATIVE TRACT 14759
E8. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security, Ordering the Annexation to
Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 3 for Parcel
Map No. 15716-2 located on the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Day Creek Boulevard,
submitted by Victoria Gardens, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-215
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER
15716-2 AND IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
RESOLUTION NO. 04-216
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF
CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1
AND 3 FOR PARCEL MAP NUMBER 15716-2
Eg. Approval to utilize Associated Engineers, Inc. and Aufbau Corporation to provide contract inspection
services for fiscal year 2004/2005, to be funded from the following accounts: 1001-305-5300 -
Development Management Contract Inspection, $37,500.00; 1001-305-5306 - Development Management
Contract Services/CFD, $100,000.00; 1001-307-5300 - Project Management General Contract Services,
$37,500.00; 1001-307-5306 - Project Management General Contract Services/CFD, $100,000.00; and
1170-303-5300 - Administration Gas Tax/Contract Services, $65,000.00.
El0. Approval to utilize Dan Guerra and Associates, Aufbau Corporation and Architerra Design Group to
provide development plan checking services for fiscal year 2004/2005, to be funded from the following
accounts: 1001-305-5300 - Development Management Contract Services, $520,000.00; 1001-305-5303 -
Development Management Contract Services Reimbursable, $100,000.00; and 1110-316-5300 -
Beautification Plan Check Services, $86,640.00.
Ell. Approval of Map for Parcel Map 16480, located at the nodhwest corner of Spruce Street and
Foothill Boulevard, submitted by Western Land Properties.
City Council Minutes
July 7, 2004
Page 5
RESOLUTION NO. 04-217
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER
16480
E12. Approval of a Master Plan Transportation Facility Reimbursement Agreement, SRA-30, (CO 04-
074) in conjunction with the development of Tract 14380, located at the northwest corner of Wilson and
Etiwanda Avenues, submitted by Mastercraft Homes.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-218
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A MASTER PLAN
TRANSPORTATION FACILITY REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR
ONE TRAVEL LANE AND MEDIAN CURBS IN WILSON AVENUE,
BE'FWEEN ETIWANDA AVENUE AND CERVANTES PLACE, SRA-30
E13. Approval of a Resolution of the City Council authorizing Transportation Enhancements (TEA-3)
grant application for funding of the Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail project.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-219
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING GRANT APPLICATION
FOR THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT
ACTIVITIES (TEA) PROGRAM FUNDING FOR THE PACIFIC
ELECTRIC INLAND EMPIRE TRAIL PROJECT
E14. Approval and authorize the execution of a sole source Professional Services Agreement in the
amount of $290,000.00 to Applied Metering Technology, Inc., (CO 04-075) for installation, configuration
and meter testing services within the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility service area, to be funded
from Acct. No. 17053035309.
E15. Approval to accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the
amount of $413,474.00 to the apparent Iow bidder, American Asphalt South, Inc., (CO 04-076) and
authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $41,347.40 for the 2004/2005 Local
Street Pavement Rehabilitation - Slurry Seal of Various Streets, to be funded from Gas Tax funds, Acct.
No. 11703035650/1022170-0 and appropriate an additional amount of $60,000.00 from Measure "1" fund
balance to Acct. No. 11763035650/1022176-0.
E16. Approval to accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the
amount of $294,889.00 to the apparent Iow bidder, Belaire-West Landscape, Inc., (CO 04-077) and
authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $29,488.90 for the Rochester Avenue,
north of Highland Avenue and Haven Avenue, north of 19th Street Landscaping project, to be funded from
Beautification funds, Acct. No. 11103165650/1339110-0 and appropriate $324,377.90 (contract award of
$294,889.00 plus 10% contingency in the amount of $29,488.90) to Acct. No. 11103165650/1339110-0
from Beautification fund balance.
E17. Approval to award and authorize the execution of a contract in the amount of $29,000 to Bluecrane,
Inc. of Redondo Beach, California, (CO 04-078) and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in
the amount of $2,900 for consulting services for the purpose of the completion of a hazard mitigation plan
and authorize an appropriation in the amount of $31,900 ($29,000 plus a 10% contingency of $2,900) into
Acct. No. 1025001-5300 to fund the contract.
E18. Approval to award and continue a Professional Services Agreement in an annual amount not to
exceed $85,000 for the period of July 1,2004 through June 30, 2005, to Huls Environmental, LLC, (CO
04-079) with an option to renew for additional one year periods, upon review and confirmation of pricing
and mutual consent, up to a total of three years, to be funded from Acct. No. 1001-313-5300.
City Council Minutes
July 7, 2004
Page 6
E19. Approval to accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the
amount of $592,000.00 to the apparent Iow bidder, Sully-M~?ler' Contracting Company, (COth 04-080) and
authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $59,200.00 for the 6 Street Storm
Drain, Railroad Crossing Improvements and Pavement Rehabilitation from Archibald Avenue to 380' west
of Hermosa Avenue, to be funded from Transpodation funds, Acct. No. 11243035650/1081124-0.
E20. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Parcel Map 15349, located on the northeast
corner of Milliken Avenue and Church Street, submitted by LDC Cougar, LLC (aka Lewis Communities).
E21. Approval to accept improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, and file a Notice of
Completion for improvements for PM 15970, located at the northeast corner of Hermosa Avenue and
Victoria Street, submitted by HMC Professional Services, LLC.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-220
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 15970 AND AUTHORIZING THE
FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
E22. Approval to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 14120, located on the south side of
Vintage Drive, west of Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by Carriage Estates, LLC.
E23. Approval to accept improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance
Bond, and file a Notice of Completion or improvements for Tract 14493-1, located on the southwest
corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Banyan Street, submitted by Young California Cucamonga, L.P.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-221
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 14493-1 AND AUTHORIZING THE
FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
E24. Approval to accept improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance
Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for Tract 15783, located on the west side of
Carnelian Street at Vivero Street, submitted by G & D Construction, Inc.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-222
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 15783 AND AUTHORIZING THE
FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
E25. Approval to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 15947, located at the southwest
corner of Base Line Road and Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by WL Homes, LLC, dba John Laing Homes.
E26. Approval to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 16001, located in the Terra Vista
Planned Community, bounded by Church Street, Elm Avenue and Spruce Avenue, submitted by LDC
Cougar, LLC (aka Lewis Communities).
E27. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond No. 8492620M in the amount of $53,638.06 for
the Foothill Boulevard Storm Drain Improvements from Etiwanda Avenue to 1600' easterly, Contract No.
02-133.
E28. Approval of Tract Map 16179 and Monumentation cash deposit, located at the southwest corner of
Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue, submitted by Burnett Development Corporation.
City Council Minutes
July 7, 2004
Page 7
RESOLUTION NO. 04-223
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP 16179 AND
MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT
MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Kurth to approve the staff recommendations in the staff
reports contained within the Consent Calendar. Motion carried 5-0.
II CONSENT ORDINANCES I
Fl. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
DRC2002-00156 - RICHLAND PINEHURST, INC. - A proposed Development Agreement to address
specific conditions of development and annexation for 150.8 acres of land located on the north side of
Wilson Avenue between Etiwanda Avenue and East Avenue- APN: 0225-083-01, 12, 13, 15, 16 and 20.
Related Files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16072, Annexation DRC2002-00865, and Tree Removal
Permit DRC2002-00461.
Kathryn L. Scott, Deputy City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 725.
ORDINANCE NO. 725 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT DRC2002-00156, A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RICHLAND-
PINEHURST, INC., FOR THE PURPOSE OF DEVELOPING AN
APPROXIMATE 150.8 ACRE SITE WITH UP TO 358 RESIDENTIAL
· LOTS, FOR PROPERTIES GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH
SIDE OF WILSON AVENUE BETWEEN ETIWANDA AVENUE AND
EAST AVENUE- APN: 0225-083-01, 12, 13, 15, 16, AND 20
MOTION: Moved by Kurth, seconded by Williams to waive full reading and approve Ordinance No.
725. Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
F2. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC
PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2003-00750 - HENDERSON CREEK PROPERTIES, LLC - A proposed
Etiwanda North Specific Plan Amendment from Very Low Residential (.1-2 dwelling units per acre) to Low
Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) for 63.5 acres of land and the proposed modification of the
circulation system in the Etiwanda Highlands Neighborhood of the Specific Plan - APN: 0225-084-04,
0226-081-09 and 10, and 0226-082-29.
Kathryn L. Scott, Deputy City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 726.
ORDINANCE NO. 726 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ETIWANDA NORTH
SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2003-00750, TO CHANGE THE
DISTRICT DESIGNATION FROM VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL (.1-2
DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW RESIDENTIAL (2-4
DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 63.5 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED
AT THE NORTHERLY END OF WARDMAN BULLOCK ROAD AT THE
INTERSECTION OF COLONBERO ROAD; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
City Council Minutes
July 7, 2004
Page 8
SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0225-084-04, 0226-081-09 AND 10,
0226-082-29
MOTION: Moved by Kurth, seconded by Williams to waive full reading and approve Ordinance No.
726. Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
F3. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
DRC2003-00751 - HENDERSON CREEK PROPERTIES, LLC - A proposed Development Agreement to
address specific conditions of development and annexation for 63.5 acres of land, located at the northerly
end of Wardman Bullock Road within the Etiwanda North Specific Plan - APN: 0225-084-04, 0226-081-
09 and 10, and 0226-082-29.
Kathryn L. Scott, Deputy City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 727.
ORDINANCE NO. 727 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT DRC2003-00751, A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND HENDERSON
CREEK PROPERTIES, LLC, FOR THE PURPOSE OF DEVELOPING
AN APPROXIMATE 65.3 ACRE SITE WITH UP TO 123 RESIDENTIAL
LOTS, FOR PROPERTIES GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE
NORTHERLY END OF WARDMAN BULLOCK ROAD AT THE
INTERSECTION OF COLONBERO ROAD - APN: 0225-084-04, 0226-
081-09 AND 10, AND 0226-082-29
MOTION: Moved by Kurth, seconded by Williams to waive full reading and approve Ordinance No.
727. Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
F4. CONSIDERATION OF ASSESSMENT AND ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT
DRC2003-01163 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -A proposal to change the Etiwanda North
Specific Plan land use designation from Very Low Residential (.1-2 dwelling units/acre) to Low
Residential (2-4 dwelling units/acre) for approximately 80 acres and from Very Iow Residential (.1-2
dwelling units/acre) to Flood Control/Resource Conservation for approximately 45 acres of land, generally
located north of Wilson Avenue between East Ave. and Wardman Bullock Rd. - APN: 0225-084-08
(portion) and 09 and 0226-082-05, 06, 07, 08, 11, 12, and 13. The entire project area of approximately
300 acres is also referred to as the Etiwanda Creek Annexation. Related Files: Annexation DRC2003-
01164, General Plan Amendment DRC2003-01162, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16072, Tentative Tract
Map SUBTT14749, and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16324.
Kathryn L. Scott, Deputy City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 728.
ORDINANCE NO. 728 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ETIWANDA NORTH
SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2003-01163, A REQUEST TO
CHANGE THE LAND DESIGNATION FROM VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL
(.1-2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW RESIDENTIAL (2-4
DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR APPROXIMATELY 80 ACRES
AND FROM VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL (.1-2 DWELLING UNITS PER
ACRE) TO FLOOD CONTROL/RESOURCE CONSERVATION FOR
APPROXIMATELY 45 ACRES OF LAND, GENERALLY LOCATED
NORTH OF WILSON AVENUE BETWEEN EAST AVENUE AND
WARDMAN BULLOCK ROAD; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
City Council Minutes
July 7, 2004
Page 9
THEREOF - APN: 0225-084-08 (PORTION) AND 09 AND 0226-081-05,
06, 07, 08, 11, 12 AND 13
MOTION: Moved by Kurth, seconded by Williams to waive full reading and approve Ordinance No. 728.
Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
] G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS I
Gl. CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL OF HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2003-00961 - LYNNE AND
RENEE MASSEY - The appeal of the Planning Commission decision to approve a single-family
residence in the Low Residential District, located at 8045 Camino Predera, Lot 12 of Tract 10035, as
proposed by Mike and Wendy Stachowiak -APN: 0207-631-02.
Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager, stated that Item F4 is an appeal of the Planning Commission
decision. She introduced Alan Warren, Assistant Planner, to present the staff report.
Staff report present by Alan Warren, Assistant Planner.
Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council were:
Renee Massey, 8088 Camino Predera, requested that Council recognize and agree to the
importance of a lower profile than has been currently approved for this project. She said
approximately two years ago she came before this Council with regard to a Concordia Homes
project on this same acreage, same hillside, and with the same concerns. She said the result of
their mutual effort with Mr. Snell of Concordia and the Council's recognition of their concerns lead
to an agreement that Concordia would modify the project to reduce the profile of the affected lots.
Regardless, that project never moved forward; instead, they have the original tract map, which
Concordia is now selling and developing lot by lot. She said this means that the City does not
have an obligation to notify neighboring homeowners. She said it was a surprise to see the three
lots being developed simultaneously at the north end of the tracts - lots 19, 20 & 21, which were
not required to go to Design Review Committee (DRC) or through the Planning Commission. It
was apparent that lot 17 had already been through the process of DRC and Planning
Commission approval and the time for any appeal had passed. She said along with Buquets and
Jim Ford, they met with Brad Buller to discuss concerns for the remaining lots and how they
would be allowed to be developed, at which time they again voiced concerns over the Hillside
Ordinance and the need for reduced profiles for all future homes along this street as outlined in
the City's development standards. She said many times it references integrity of the hillside and
it addresses preservation of views. She said in the meantime lot 12 was already going through
the DRC and it wasn't until the Planning Commission meeting on May 26th that they were able to
express to the Commission that as far as Lynne and her were concerned, this project did not
meet those standards. The DRC had requested the applicant investigate lowering the height of
the house and noted that it was possible to redesign the project and further reduce the height of
the home. She said the applicant chose not to make any changes or submit any information on
the committee's request to investigate the idea. The Planning Commission did approve the
project because DRC had not required that a design be explored. She said they had not had the
opportunity to meet Mike and Wendy Stachowiak, so after the appeal was filed, they were invited
to their home to bring them up to date with the process over the last four years. She said they
were surprised and could understand their concerns; at that time, Lynne did tell them that
dropping the pad 6 to 8 feet would accomplish the goal of a reduced profile and still give them
their view and backyard. She commented that the Stachowiaks were not interested in doing that.
She said the staff report states that the house satisfied all requirements of the Hillside
Development Standard; however, site characteristics state the grades are approximately 24%
over most of the lot with significant stepper grades near the south portion. She asked if this is
City Council Minutes
July 7, 2004
Page 10
true, why was a slope analysis not required to determine the true grade; if an approximation is
being used and recognition of steeper grades apparent, then she is not sure a true picture of this
lot is being presented. She said the crux of the matter Es if this project is approved as is, it will
set the standard for the rest of the lot-by-lot developments; if this project is approved as is,
without dropping the pad of the home, there will be no reason for the rest of the lots to have a Iow
profile. She said they are not expecting anything less than what the City approved along Red Hill
Country Club Drive with Iow profile homes showing sometimes roof tops and sometimes not even
that. These are expectations andCstandards that already exist. She said her and Lynne
respectfully request that the Council recognize the standard that this project will create and ask
that the project be modified to achieve a good solution for this.whole area.
Councilmember Gutierrez asked Mrs. Massey to what degree is their view impacted.
Renee Massey answered that it is not impacted at all at this time.
Chuck Buquet, 8725 Camino Predera, referred to a tract map and located where he lives and the
lots affected. He said the Red Hill area is an eclectic community but it is a community with some
very unique characteristics. He said his concern with respect to what has occurred is that they
have been expressing concern about this site even before Concordia owned it. He said they
have been working with staff and the development interests that have come through. He said
with respect to this property back when the map was done with the Concordia presentation of this
project, there was discussion with respect to the slope areas. He said during an appeal, it's a
little disheartening to the appellant when the only resolution that is offered is the one that denies
the appeal. He said it would be nice to give the impression that there is an opportunity or
alternative available that would support what they requested. He said he has Planning
Commission minutes from January 24, 2001, whereby it indicates that the planner assigned at
that time states that the site has slopes in excess of 30% and indicated that a site with 30% slope
could not be developed into current standards and the only way to achieve the development site
is to have slopes as steep as 1.5 to 1 and some retaining walls as high as ten feet. He said the
Concordia map that had come through with the process had addressed those things. He said
there was reference to the April 6, 2004 Design Review comments, item 3, which states, "As part
of the grading design, a significant mound (remnant feature of the Camino Predera roadway cut)
is proposed to be removed from the front yard area." He said that remnant mound is not really a
remnant mound; it's a natural contour of the hill. He said that is an approximate 28.-- something
slope going down from that hill down to the bottom of the property. He passed out exhibits. He
said Mrs. Massey made reference regarding the slope analysis and variance. He said back when
Concordia had to go through a variance process in order to be able to do what they wanted to do
and develop in those areas. He said they asked for an opportunity to review and in meetings with
the City Planner, he indicated that a variance would be required for this project; when it went
before the Planning Commission, there was no requirement for a variance and there was no
advertisement for a variance as part of this project approval. He said that issue was raised, and
he still does not have an answer to that. He said the other question asked that we review city
files with respect to a slope analysis. He said a slope analysis is required when there are slopes
in excess of 8%, particularly to determine the exact percentages of that slope as to determine
where you can develop and where you can't develop as far as building. He handed to Council
excerpts from the City's Development Code, 17.24.030 (D), regarding slope analysis map for the
purpose of determining the amount and location of land as it exists. He referenced item no. 3,
"The slope profile shall extend far enough from the project site boundary to clearly show impact
on adjacent property, at least one hundred fifty feet." He quickly referenced the Hillside
Development Ordinance handout materials that referenced the requirements and the last page,
indicating the street grade at '~322, curb line and roofline elevation at 1312, which would be 12
feet below the street grade, which is what they worked hard to achieve. He asked that the
Council do what the Planning Commission suggested, the DRC, which was to have the applicant
evaluate and come up with a way through a combination of pad grade and roof profile, reduce the
profile of that house. He said he has not seen that many garages that have a set of windows on
the top of the garage in the front, and he would suggest that is not appropriate here, and ask for
your consideration. He also requested that the Council ask that the same be done here as Lot
City Council Minutes
July 7, 2004
Page 11
17, which has a driveway coming on the left side, across the front and into the garage which has
allowed them to drop down at least eight feet.
Virgil Buckner, 9394 Kempster, Fontana, stated he had been a neighbor of Mike and Wendy
Stachowiak for over twenty years. He said he needed for it to be on the record that they are very
good people. He said their plans have been changed more than once to try and appease the
neighbors; he said he doesn't think the neighbors can be appeased, as they don't want anybody
building there and would like to stop that from happening. He said his friends' lives have been
put on hold over this issue, and while they have been waiting, the interest rates are climbing,
which is costing them more money. He said all they want is the American dream--the inherent
right to build a house on their property. He said it seems the existing neighbors would like to
impose new standards on these people coming in here; however, these standards weren't
imposed on them. He said according to your Planning Commission, these ideas work. They
have gone through all the proper channels. He asked that the Council do not impose standards
on them that weren't imposed on everyone else that has built in that area.
Wendy Stachowiak, 9427 Mango, Fontana, owners of the home at 8045 Camino Predera. She
said they bought this lot because it looked like a nice area to live in. She said they liked the
schools and liked the community. She didn't know about the Concordia homes, etc. She said
her dream home would have been two stories above ground like the others down the street, but
in consideration of the neighbors and the third set of plans that they had to submit (as the first
were rejected), they put one story of the home underground, leaving only a single story above
ground for profile. She said when they went to the Design Review Committee (DRC), there were
no changes and no stipulations, so we left it as was. She said DRC mentioned that we might
want to push it further down the hill or drop the pitch of the roof. She said a couple of plans were
drawn up that showed a different pitch in the roof, but it didn't look right, and they had already
dropped it one full story, so they didn't do that. She said the Chairman of the Commission said it
looks to him that we were sent mixed messages to begin with, as the house was approved, but
we were told to look at these two things and it was suggested maybe if you would like to... She
said the Chairman said if he were them, he wouldn't even consider dropping the roof or pushing it
down the hill because DRC has already approved it. She said another lady on the Commission
asked if we would consider dropping the roofline. She said they would. At the Planning
Commission meeting, the front profile of the garage was lowered so it's level with the rest of the
house. The Chairman thought that was a very good, win/win situation. The house was tailored to
appease the neighbors and yet we were happy at the same time. She said because of the slope
of the land, pushing the house further down the hill wouldn't change the roof pitch much; it
wouldn't lower the house but maybe a couple of feet and it would lose the whole backyard for the
kids. She said there's still enough back yard there now so with a small retaining wall, there is a
grass area. She said they tried to work with the neighbors on this; they have gone by all the
guidelines that the City has set. She asked that the Council please consider upholding the
Planning Commission's decision to let them build this home. She said interest rates are rising,
and if they get much higher, they won't be able to afford to live there. She said she would like to
be an added member to this community.
Mike Stachowiak, 9427 Mango, Fontana, stated his neighbors have said that they have not tried
to work with the Planning Commission much at all. He said they have done this three different
times; turned in the first set of plans, and they were rejected; second set of plans were rejected
and the third set of plans were accepted. He said they have complied with all the Hillside building
codes and regulations, etc. They are at 24 feet on the height line, and they are allowed 30 feet.
He said to be asked to push the house further down the hill is unacceptable. He said the plans
were designed and accepted and he asks that the Council tonight continue to honor the plans.
He said that Mr. Buquet is currently developing two-story townhomes at the bottom of that hill.
He said any view that he would have had, he wouldn't have. He said he would only have a view
of the back of the new townhomes.
Suzanne Buquet, 8725 Camino Predera, stated she wanted to clarify a few things. She said the
townhomes that Mike mentioned are not their townhomes; they belong to a client. She referred to
City Council Minutes
July 7, 2004
Page 12
the tract map. She said Mr. Snyder, the builder of the Mike & Wendy's house, has also
purchased three other lots. She said they are concerned because whatever happens to this
particular house, which is not personal and is not affecting their view, will set the stage for
everything else. She said they did try in good faith and made an offer on the houses across the
street from them (vacant lots), but the price that Mr. Snyder paid and then offered to us was
almost doubled. She said when someone else made an offer to Concordia on pricing these other
lots, it was almost double that price. The said the height limitations for the Hillside Ordinance
may be 30 ft, but the CC&R's on this tract limit it to 24 feet. She said this particular house is
almost at that level.
There being no further response, the public hearing was closed.
Mayor Pro Tern Williams asked Mr. Buller, City Planner, about the requirements for notification to
neighbors.
Mr. Bullet answered that there is not any requirements by code.
Mayor Pro Tern Williams stated that the Code needs to be changed.
Mayor Pro Tern Williams stated that this really concerns her because it represents what she calls in-fill
development, especially on the west side because of the now profitability of building a single home. She
says now when you drive around on the west side, it's starting to look funny. She said there is a big
square box with no character, no individuality, no creativity, and for some reason because it's a single
family home, one at a time, we supposedly have to let the owner build whatever they want. She said this
is bringing this to a head; she said she has been complaining about it for quite some time and she thinks
we need to get real serious about sitting down and creating some in-fill guidelines. She said the west
side is starting to look funny. She said there is nothing wrong with adding new to old, but not when the
new looks so obvious and so different and so out of character to the neighborhood that it is being added
to. She said this just struck a nerve with her and it bothers her that we have all these strict rules for a
developer who is putting in a string of homes. She said she remembers working on the Concordia project
and it was finally hammered out, it was to be very pleasant and nice looking and keeping with the
character of the older style of Red Hill. She said Red Hill is eclectic and there are some homes that she
would imagine in the next few years if the profitability stays the same that would literally be torn down and
rebuilt. She said this project was hard fought, and standards were set for it, and she is very concerned.
She said she is disappointed that our Planning Commission has backed off from what they use to be very
strict about, being creative and now especially with Hillside. She said we have all these development
standards, all these codes, all these drawings; she asked what is it good for if we are not going to stick to
it. She said she has read different minutes that repeatedly say "it meets the standard," "it covers the
minimum." She said in Rancho Cucamonga that's never been our byline; we have pounded out some of
the finest, most attractive projects in the Inland Empire, and we are proud of them; and the owners, after
it's done, are very proud too. She said we have had lots of people tell the DRC (Design Review
Committee), "1 don't like your suggestion," "I'm not going to do them," and they've held firm and they do
them, and then they turn out with a beautiful project. She said if these minutes are accurate, she's
appalled to read that "they did not submit changes requested by the Design Review Committee because
they were not acceptable to them." They looked at what the DRC requested, but the clients did not like it.
She said to get rid of the Design Review Committee, why bother, why are we doing this. She said it's
ridiculous to go through all this. She said it's like Rancho Cucamonga's essence is sliding like sand
through her fingers. She said as she drives around town, she is seeing it everywhere. She said these
poor people are getting the brunt of my disgruntledness, but what they should have done was gotten an
independent architect, walked out to the site and driven around Red Hill. She said there are a lot of
driveways that are very steep and the homes are in high demand, so it's not that a steep drive is a
detriment completely. She said an architect should have gone out there, and working with these
restrictions, sculpted a beautiful home under this hillside. She said from the drawings, it looks like they
took a page out of a catalog and tried to carve a house up to make it fit and cover the minimum standards
that are required. She said she is really disappointed. She thinks going back to the DRC would be an
opportunity to drop that house a little bit. She said there's other ways to drop it besides just cutting off the
roof. She said the straight roofline doesn't impress her either, but that's her own problem. She said there
City Council Minutes
July 7, 2004
Page 13
are ways that it could be dropped or maybe the design could be redone. She said she likes the idea of
the private road behind the houses. She thinks that should be researched as to how that could be done,
then you don't have along the front piece of the street, garage door after garage door. She thinks it needs
to go back to DRC and she thinks the Planning Commission needs to be reminded that there's a slope
analysis required, which evidently was not done. She said these are there own rules that they did not
follow.
Couneilmember Kurth said he's always loved the Red Hill area, and it has a lot of character. He said
when he drove down Camino Predera to look at the topography and try to understend it better, and when
he saw the first three houses, it was almost shocking. He said they are so big, that you feel you are
traveling into a canyon. He said he's sure they meet all the requirements, but it didn't seem to fit the
neighborhood. He said the development of this hillside has been a difficult area to develop for a long,
long time; people have spent a lot of time trying to figure out what is going to fit with the community end
meet all the codes end still be a nice place to live. He said it seems that the developer feels thet maybe
he would rather not meet all those requirements, or can't meet them, so he has chosen to sell off these
lots individually. He said it is unfair to the purchasers because now they are stuck with the problems that
have never been completely resolved. He said in his opinion it is a matter of aesthetics; he does not think
it sets e precedent for every area of Rancho Oucamonga, but in this area, he thinks that the architect can
do a better job at designing this house so that it fits better with the community, with the surrounding,
existing houses. He said he thinks that the architecture that is developed does need to apply to all the
houses because it's all those houses - 10 to 12 - and they need to fit with the neighborhood/existing
houses. He said he would support the appeal. He said he feels it's their obligation to do that.
Mayor Alexander asked dim Markman, City Attorney, if there is a slope analysis required and did the
Planning Commission, in fact, error.
dim Markman, City Attorney, stated he has not independently verified any of what Mr. Buquet said about
percentages; Jn fact, he has not even had an opportunity to talk to the Planning staff. He said Brad is
familiar with that position, so is the City Engineer's Office, so he deferred to them. He said there is a
requirement there to get an analysis done if there's a slope of a certain percentage. He said Chuck
Buquet could have been talking about the whole project; he does not know what percentage specificelly
applies to this lot or whether they have looked at that, so he would defer to the Engineer.
Brad Bullet, City Planner, stated that with this project, they required a conceptual grading plan to start
with, which did go through grading committee, so they are capable of knowing the slopes, conditions, and
there was a map that shows the existing grading conditions on the east and west, north end south of this
subject site. He said, in fact, when the original map was approved early in 1981, there was a grading
plan that came with that. He said there was no need for a slope analysis because typically that slope
analysis calculation is how land development density numbers, range, where it can and where it can't be
developed are determined. He said these were all buildable lots that were originally entitled to be built
upon. He said he has been here and has seen five/six different projects proeessed on this same pieee of
property. He said they have had approvals of homes, or at least Commission approval, that fronted the
entire street. He said then they had another developer come in and looked at alternatives. He seid it is
true the last one came in and came up with this extremely creative idea about putting a private road
down; but there was mass discussion on the part of the Commission about whether or not we want these
huge retaining walls facing the south, Foothill Blvd., as viewed from down below. He said there was a lot
of concern, but it was still deemed to be a better solution neighborly wise to do that. He said there is
nothing legally that we can determine that would require this developer to do a lower drive or private drive
concept; that was just one that was worked out, negotiated; he said he has the ability to sell these off
independently, and we are then subject to having to review them independently. He said under that
review, we have the right to notice neighbors, which we did. He said Mr. Buquet and Mrs. Massey have
always indicated to us their interest and so we have been trying to keep them abreast. He said Mr.
Buquet even submitted his comments to Design Review, which was how he did not feel that it was within
the spirit intent of which should have been the right design for this site. He said the Design Review
considered that in their evaluation. He said from staff's opinion, for this specific request, there was not
the need and requirement for the slope analysis. He said we had all the technical data necessary.
City Council Minutes
July 7, 2004
Page 14
Jim Markman, City Attorney, said he would put it a different way; he would say that the data was all there
in the file that constituted the equivalent of a slope analysis so it would have been wasteful and expensive
to generate another one and put a cover sheet on it to compile the same information.
Councilmember Williams stated that the grading plan has been absolute; she asked if there is no change
at all to the grading plan whatsoever.
Brad Buller, City Planner, answered that the reason for a slope analysis is to look at the original
topography of the property--not the intended design of the property. That's where your precise grading
plan comes from.
Mayor Pro Tem Williams said you already had a grading plan so she is asking if this is the original
grading plan and if they are sticking to it exactly.
Brad Bullet, City Planner, answered, "No." He said there was an original concept grading plan for the
tract, which left the lots as they are today. He said it was graded for the streets as they exist, and the lots
were left. He said the original base topography hasn't changed, but their design of their product and the
way they wanted to put the house on the property did impact and it did change the grading plan, and that
is what was submitted and approved and reviewed by the Committee and the Commission.
Mayor Pro Tern Williams asked if there's any reason that since the Design Review asked them to do other
things, that they just caved or just ignored it. She said she's really disappointed if that's what Design
Review is all about.
Mayor Pro Tem Williams said she is talking about referring back to the originally approved design for the
homes on that street. She said it was long and thought out and an agreement was reached on what the
homes on that street should look like, and now that's been thrown away; and one at a time, now you can
bring back the very thing that was thrown out. She said, in other words, we're reversing the process. She
said she is a little disturbed that Rancho Cucamonga is going to start doing that sort of thing, as we didn't
use to do that.
Mayor Alexander said if he understands it correctly, the street located on the lower elevation was a tract
submittal and not a single individual plan and that's why in fact there is no necessary compliance with that
particular lot being located lower, because there is no valid plan for all these houses to be built by
Concordia.
Brad Buller confirmed that is correct.
Mayor Alexander said they are being sold off individually. He said some of the reasons the standards in
Rancho Cucamonga are difficult to adhere to is because the standards are higher to begin with. He said
he does think they are meeting the standards. He said he does understand the Buquets and Masseys
concerns, and he appreciates that. He said he drove the area twice. He asked if there is a requirement
for landscaping also to be dropped in this particular project or could they have grown mature trees.
Brad Buller, City Planner, said there is no condition about limitation of vegetation.
Mayor Alexander said there are tons of trees at Red Hill that are completely obscure. He asked the City
Attorney if we could establish a standard with respect to vision. He said if people are going through the
process, he doesn't think that we're very fair in going back and changing the rules in mid stream; He
asked Mr. Markman if we intend on going ahead and dropping this down, can a standard be established
like that.
Jim Markman, City Attorney, answered that you could do either. He said if you read the Hillside
Ordinance, like so many Rancho Cucamonga ordinances, it gives incredible amounts of discretion--first,
in this case of the Planning Commission and now the Council. He said if you feel you need to put
conditions on this project in a way that meets the values in addition to the minimum standards, you can
do it; or, if you don't think that's fair, which he said he can understand why Council wouldn't think it's fair,
City Council Minutes
July 7, 2004
Page 15
(because it does not give a whole lot of criteria for people that follow in the first instance, because they
get to the Council level and something will change), you can change that; you can direct the staff to
explicitly deal with this problem and structurally change the standard. He said if you are concerned about
view protection, you could even deal with landscaping, trees, anything that blocks lines of sight. He said
that is up to the Council.
Mayor Alexander stated that he is in favor of denying the appeal. He said we have an issue here where
people were lead down a path, accommodating the plans that they needed to accommodate and went
farther than they absolutely needed to. He said we have existing people in the area who do have a
concern about the whole characteristic of Red Hill and preserving some areas where the entire public can
still drive the area and have a view. He said we can for future development look at controlling that and
set that standard or that guideline knowing that maybe that's what we want to do. He said he does not
feel that if we deny the appeal, and indicate that we are going to establish this, that we're setting a
precedent by allowing this to be built; they've already dropped this. He said he does not want to punish
people who have jumped through the hoops just because it is going to impact some views.
Councilmember Howdyshell asked is it accurate that we don't have any view corridor requirements.
Brad Buller, City Planner, respond that that is accurate.
Councilmember Howdyshell asked if it's accurate that they have been to the DRC three times.
Brad Buller, City Planner, stated they have been to DRC throe times; they have made numerous
revisions, not just three times, but they have worked with both staff and Design Review.
Jim Markman, City Attorney, stated in answer to the first question, there is nothing in the Hillside
Standards that literally says no new construction or foliage or either will block an existing view; however,
Chapter 24 is full of value statements about view protection as well as natural contour protection and part
of what you have to submit with an application or line of sight diagrams, so there is no question that one
of the values for Hillside Protection is protection of views. He said it is up to the Council's discretion. He
said you don't have a literal specific standard as Bill said, but you do have the discretionary authority to
protect a view if it's demonstrated that a view is going to be disrupted. He said you could do it now; it's
not literally and clearly stated to be a development standard.
Councilmember Howdyshell said he would imagine that the building of the road down below like the
previous developer was going to do is terribly expensive, and he can't imagine somebody wanting to build
on a hill and then accepting a requirement to set their house down in a hole. He said he believes that
they lowered the profile of the home and he can see reason to use the existing street and not have to
have a privately maintained and built street down below with a large retaining wall. He said if the majority
of the Council is going to send this back to Planning, we need to be very clear on what's accepted and
what's unacceptable with this so that we don't jerk them around any more.
Councilmember Gutierrez said he wants Mike and Wendy to be a part of our community, to beat the
interest rates, and we want them to be happy with the home. He asked staff if is it true that if he lowered
his home further that the townhomes would impede his view, or do we not have enough information right
now to know that.
Brad Bullet, City Planner, stated there are two townhome projects; one has been approved, just west of
the flood channel, west of the Albertsons. He said that is probably the project most closely related to this
OhO not the one that the Buquets represent as a consultant. He said there is a condominium project
approved on that project site. He said it's been approved and they have been trying to pencil it; what they
heard two weeks ago is that they may not be able to build the project if it ends up being too expensive
and so we may come back with a whole new project on that site. He said at this stage it's been entitled
from a standpoint of a land use approval, but they have not gone through any building grading permit
process to actually begin the project.
City Council Minutes
July 7, 2004
Page 16
Councilmember Gutierrez stated then we really don't know to what degree Mike and Wendy's view will be
blocked by any future projects in front of them. He said he is familiar with Red Hell as well. He said there
are a variety of designs in that neighborhood. He agrees with Mrs. Williams in that it seems that we are
getting away from what makes that community and the City in general unique. He said he was on
Etiwanda Avenue a couple of days ago and saw a small home that had been there many years, and right
up against it on each side are huge, two-story monstrosities; he said the contrast really struck him. He
said that Mrs. Williams' fears are consistent with his. He said he feels Red Hill is neglected and thinks we
could redo Red Hill, but that's another issue. He said what he wants to see happen is that any new
homes built in this development, particularly with this home, meet the community standards for what is
adequate vista wise; and if neighbors in the community, which they should have an input, have
disagreements on different opinions, they should be listened to. He said he feels bad for what Mike and
Wendy have been through. He said he heard comments that were made by the Planning Commission,
and that disturbs him. He wants the public to know that the Council is the final word; they make the policy,
the law--not the Planning Commission; they follow our lead. He said what we need to do is make sure
that we revisit these ordinances--Hillside; line of sight, etc, and make a standard, because it's definitely
not clear, and that is not fair to the Stachowiaks. He said he feels badly for them, but we do need to get
together to revisit and redo, refine and keep making this community better by having some consistency
and making sure that the Planning Commission knows what that consistency is. He said he thinks we
need to take the lead there and thinks the Planning Commission takes too much of the lead. He said we
are the leaders.
Mayor Alexander asked if there is a "line of sight" ordinance that he is not aware of.
Councilmember Gutierrez stated he thinks we need to set one (line of sight ordinance).
Mayor Alexander stated if we don't have one, how could we enforce it?
Gutierrez said we need to develop an idea of what are standards are, as they have been lost over the last
several years.
Mayor Alexander said if we are going to set a new standard for people who are developing in this
community, we must tell them up front rather than have them spend thousands of dollars and go through
a process and then it be flushed down the toilet simply because we want to change the rules midstream.
He said if we want to go ahead and change the rules, then we better do it beforehand so people know
where we're coming from.
Mayor Pro Tem Williams stated that it is not at all unfair; if you read these guidelines, and had the
guidelines been followed, there would not have been the issue. She read the following from the Hillside
Ordinance, "Any significant public vista or view corridor as seen from a secondary collector or major
arterial should be protected." She said this may not be considered a secondary street, but it is a very
common street for people to drive along just to see the view. She said she wasn't even talking so much
about view, she was talking more the view she has looking at the houses; but regardless, she said we
have set some guidelines, and she doesn't feel we are changing anything. She said we may need to
clarify them, but the guidelines should have been followed more closely.
Councilmember Kurth stated this is a difficult issue, and property owners have certain rights, which he is
very respectful of. He said he hopes that the owners of this property can find a way to develop a house
that they believe can be their dream house. He believes that if we work a little harder at it, we can do a
better job, and get a better house for the homeowner as well as for the whole community.
Mayor Alexander said he doesn't want to insult the Planning Commission, as they are absolutely one of
the best buffers in the world that we have; he said the Planning Commission makes lots of decisions and
only when they're appealed do they come here. He said we may never in fact see them nor do we put
our seal of approval on them; they go through the Planning Commission, and they are approved at that
level He said if we don't have confidence in the Planning Commission and want to replace them, that's
another thing. He said, "Planning Commission, you do a tremendous job."
City Council Minutes
July 7, 2004
Page 17
RESOLUTION NO. 04-224
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, UPHOLDING THE ACTION OF THE
PLANNING COMMISSION AND APPROVING HILLSIDE
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00961, A REQUEST TO
CONSTRUCT A 3,628 SQUARE FOOT SINGLE-FAMILY HOME ON
LOT 12 OF TRACT 10035 IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4
DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED AT 8045 CAMINO
PREDERA; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN:
0207-631-02.
MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Howdyshell to approve the Resolution No. 04-224,
upholding the action of the Planning Commission. Motion failed (3-2 with Councilmembers Gutierrez,
Williams and Kurth voting against the motion).
Brad Buller, City Planner, asked if it is the intent then to defer it back to the Commission with specific
direction and should that be included in the resolution.
Mayor Pro Tem Williams stated she would like as starters to go back to the Design Review comments, as
they had some good suggestions. She said they are hard-working individuals, but she thinks this one
was sod of easier to push along because they are a little over worked right now.
Brad Bullet, City Planner, stated they will prepare a resolution with the condition on that approval of the
appeal that it be referred back to design review.
Jim Markman, City Attorney, stated that is up to the applicant. He said if this appeal is granted, that's the
end of this process. He said what the Council can do when they get this at the next meeting, is instruct
the staff that if the applicant wants to stick with that application, save filing fees and do everything all over,
modify their application and take whatever direction they took from tonight's council discussion as well as
the staff, it can be processed that way. He said the only real relief you can give is to relieve them from
having to go through a whole new application.
MOTION: Moved by Kurth, seconded by Williams to direct staff to bring back a resolution granting the
appeal to the next City Council meeting for consideration. Motion carried 3-2 (Alexander and Howdyshell
voted against the motion).
No Items Submitted.
II I. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS I
I1. PRESENTATION ON CODE ENFORCEMENT'S FIRST GRANT FUNDED NEIGHBORHOOD
CL~:AN-UP DAY - (Oral)
City Council Minutes
July 7, 2004
Page 18
Presentation by Mark Salazar, Code Enforcement Supervisor and Alison Rowlen, Code Enforcement
Officer, gave the oral presentation.
]1 J. COVNCI m SINESS [
J'l. CONSIDERATION OF THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION AND CITY COUNCIL COMMUNITY
SERVICES SUBCOMMITTEE'S RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE ONE NEW APPOINTMENT TO
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Councilmember Gutierrez gave the oral report. He stated the Community Foundation and City Council
Community Services Subcommittee recommends the appointment of Darren Vilardo to the Community
Foundation Board of Directors.
MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Howdyshell, to approve the appointment of Darren Vilardo
to the Community Foundation Board of Directors. Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
J2. LEGISLATIVE UPDATE - (Oral)
Councilmember Williams talked about the local government-funding package. She said there were
enough signatures to get a measure on the ballot to protect local funding. She said the Governor struck a
deal with cities, counties and special districts saying give him two more years of takeaways and he will
promote a different initiative and will help get the initiative through that there will be no more state
takeaways after two years and no more mandates. She said last week they heard that the Governor is
beginning to cave on his promise. She said all cities in the state and the counties have had this coalition
we've been working on and it kicked it. She said we were told from an insider in the Governor's Office
that the Governor said to call it off. She said every legislator that was involved in this was hit with a
phone call, fax and e-mail. They were told that the Governor stands beside you and is committed. She
said it started to unravel again, and so they went to Sacramento this date and talked to legislators. She
reminded them that we were counting on them to support the Governor's first package and are counting
on the Governor to support it. She quoted the Mayors of LA and Oakland regarding this issue. She said
that $40 billion has been taken from local government in recent years. She said the last they heard is that
they are still trying to find a compromise that the League of Cities could be happy with. She said the
Governor said he would get this to the Legislature. She said we were lead to believe that if he could not
get this through the Legislature, that he would support our initiative. She said our initiative says "no
takeaways." She said the Governor's plan says two years of takeaways ($2.5 billion), then no more
takeaways. She said now the Governor is saying he won't support our initiative no matter what because
he needs that two year's worth. We are saying that he better hold his word here. She encouraged
anybody who knows anybody in Sacramento to call them or send an e-mail that cities, counties and
special districts need this package passed. She said nobody is taking a leadership role in getting this
thing done.
Councilmember Kurth thanked Mayor Pro Tern Williams for providing the leadership needed to take our
message to Sacramento. He said the League of Cities and Mayor Pro Tern Williams have been
organizing this fight at a local level, and Legislator Bob Dutton and our current Senator Jim Brulte have
been fighting for us trying to hold the State accountable and not allow them to take our money out of our
City coffers. He said Diane is the one at the local level who has been leading the charge, and he wants
to publicly thank her.
"[I K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR THE NEXT MEETING
K1. Report on extension of flood channel - Bella Vista project.
City Council Minutes
July 7, 2004
Page 19
II ,~. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS I
L1. John Lyons re Item G1 (appeal).
L2. Hilda Phillips re 4thof July & Red Hill area.
L3. Maria J. Perez re exhibit to honor all presidents.
L4. Carol Douglas re"Clean-up Day."
L5. Mike Stachowiak re G1 (appeal).
MOTION: Movad by Williams, seconded by Howdyshell to adjourn. Motion carriad unanimously 5-0.
The meeting adjourned at 9:32 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Debra J. Adams, CMC
City Clerk
Approved: *
July 21, 2004
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION MINUTES
The Rancho Cucamonga City Council held a closed session on Wednesday, July 21, 2004, in the Tapia
Room of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The
meeting was called to order at 5:30 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander.
Present were Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, Robed J. Howdyshell, Donald J. Kurth, M.D., Diane
Williams and Mayor William J. Alexander.
Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager; James Markman, City
Attorney; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director; and George Rivera,
Administrative Services Manager.
ii CLO D I
Mayor Alexander announced the closed session item.
B1. LABOR NEGOTIATIONS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6 TO GIVE GEORGE
RIVERA, ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES MANAGER; PAMELA EASTER, DEPUTY CITY MANAGER;
AND LARRY TEMPLE, ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR, DIRECTION IN REGARDS TO THE
MEET AND CONFER PROCESS - CITY
B2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL PUSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54956.9(A) TO DISCUSS THE EMINENT DOMAIN PROCEEDING TITLED (CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA V. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, ET AL., SAN BERNARDINO
COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CASE NO. RCV 068007 - CITY
Il c. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)
No communication was made on the closed session items.
D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION
The closed session began at 5:30 p.m.
II E. CiTY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS I
City Council Minutes
July 21,2004
Page 2
The closed session adjourned at 6:53 p.m. and reconvened at 9:26 p.m. Closed session adjourned at
10:03 p.m. with no action taken.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Regular Meeting
A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, July 21, 2004, in the
Council Chambers of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga,
California. Mayor William J. Alexander called the meeting to order at 7:14 p.m.
Present were Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, Robert J. Howdyshell, Donald J. Kurth, M.D., Diane
Williams and Mayor William J. Alexander.
Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Pam Easter, Deputy City Manager; James Markman, City
Attorney; Linde D. Daniels, RDA Director; James Frost, City Treasurer; Larry Temple, Administrative
Services Director; Charles Scott, Sr. Information Systems Specialist; Shelly Munson, Information Systems
Specialist; Dawn Haddon, Purchasing Manager; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Brad Buller, City Planner;
Larry Henderson, Principal Planner; Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director; Dave Moore,
Recreation Superintendent; Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III; Deborah Clark, Library Director;
Captain Pete Ortiz, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; Chief Peter Bryan, Rancho Cucamonga Fire
Protection Districtl Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager; Kimberly Thomas, Management Analyst
II; Kathy Scott, Deputy City Clerk; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk.
No announcements/presentations were made.
C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
C1. John Lyons, Etiwanda, stated he wanted to complain about Councilmember Kurth. He mentioned
Councilmember Kurth's comments he had made in the newspaper the other day about managed growth.
He talked about the growth in Etiwanda and the impacts it can have on the City. He mentioned the
availability of water CVWD can provide for this area. He asked everyone to vote "no" on Kurth at the
November election.
C2. Janet Ryerson, Sr. Advisory Committee, said thank you to the Council for Central Park. She
commented on the progress of the park, which includes a senior center and community center. She felt
this was a great accomplishment for the City. She felt they are meeting the challe.nges of today and the
future. She again stated thank you for raising the bar for this project.
City Council Minutes
July 21,2004
Page 3
C3. An unidentified man thanked the City Council for what they have done with the new senior center
and Central Park. He talked about how much better it will accommodate all of the seniors and their
activities. He thanked the Council for looking out for them.
C4. Pauline Dean mentioned the $10,000,000 that Senator Brulte got for the senior center. She also
mentioned the money that Congressman Dreier obtained for this project. She asked everybody to help
write letters to our legislators to get $500,000 for transportation use.
Mayor Alexander stated it is Pauline Dean and the seniors that have worked so hard to get this project
where it is today.
C3. Melanie Ingram wished Ms. Dean a "Happy Birthday." She distributed copies of a report from the
Center for Governmental Studies entitled "Losing Ground" and how this relates to managing growth in the
City. She also commented on an article she read in the Daily Bulletin where Councilmember Kurth stated
that it didn't matter how he got elected.
l[ o. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS I
D1. Councilmember Gutierrez commented on construction delays throughout the City and also the dust
created from the construction. He asked for people to be patient because he felt it would be very
rewarding once everything was completed. He commented on the mall project stating he is very excited
about it. He felt the City needs the revenue and jobs the mall would create. He commented on the
musical that took place at Los Osos High School last weekend. He stated the Music Man was a great
production.
D2. Councilmember Howdyshell stated he is very excited about the new senior facility and the mall. He
expressed thanks to the staff for all of their work on this.
Mayor Alexander stated he agreed.
D3. Councilmember Kurth stated he is proud of all the great things going on in the City, and stated it is a
team effort that has got this done. He commented on the people he has met while he is walking precincts
and that he has forwarded their issues so they can be resolved. He stated he is proud to be part of this
team.
D4. Councilmember Williams commented on the wonderful "Project Isaiah," which has taken weapons off
the street and turned them into steel. She stated the Governor was at the Ontario Mills and commented
on the number of people that were in attendance supporting his message about the budget. She
commented on the inland Empire Division of the League and the speaker from the League's last meeting
that was talking about Measure I. She stated this needed to be extended when it comes to the voters
again because of all the things it does for transportation issues.
D5. Mayor Alexander stated the City is working hard to keep the Library open as many hours as
possible. He added he agreed with everything other Councilmembers have stated about the senior
center. He also commented on Marsha Banks correcting the pronunciation of "Cucamonga," and also
stated the City is trying to make the Route 30 Freeway as safe as possible.
[[ E. CONSENT CALENDAR I
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated E7 needs to be removed from the agenda and that it will come
back at a future meeting.
City Council Minutes
July 21, 2004
Page 4
El. Approval of Warrants, Register July 1 through July 13, 2004, and Payroll ending July 13, 2004, for
the total amount of $3,778,319.76.
E2. Approve to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of June 30, 2004.
E3. Approval of plans and specifications for the "Removal and Replacement of Grand Prix Fire Damaged
Fencing along the Skyline, Monroe Canyon, Davis and Hermosa Easement Community Equestrian Trails"
and authorize the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids," to be funded from Capital Reserve
Acct. No. 1025001-5650/1497025-0 as approved in the FY 2004/05 budget.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-225
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR "REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT OF GRAND
PRIX FIRE DAMAGED FENCING ALONG THE SKYLINE, MONROE
CANYON, DAVIS AND HERMOSA EASEMENT COMMUNITY
EQUESTRIAN TRAILS" AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE
CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
E4. Approval of plans and specifications for the "Removal and Replacement of Grand Prix Fire Damaged
Flexible Metal Guard Rails and Posts at 4 Locations" and authorize the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice
Inviting Bids," to be funded from Capital Reserve Acct. No. 1025001-5650/1498025-0 as approved in the
FY 2004/05 budget.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-226
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR "REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT OF GRAND
PRIX FIRE DAMAGED FLEXIBLE METAL GUARD RAILS AND POSTS
AT 4 LOCATIONS" AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY
CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
E5. Approval to Summarily Vacate the Drainage and Trail Easement of Parcel Map No. 15349, a
dedicated easement for future drainage and trail purposes; located north of Church Street, east side of
Milliken Avenue; V-196 - APN: 227-151-73.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-227
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE
VACATION OF THE DRAINAGE AND TRAIL EASEMENT OF PARCEL
MAP NO. 15349, A DEDICATED EASEMENT FOR FUTURE
DRAINAGE AND TRAIL PURPOSES, LOCATED NORTH OF CHURCH
STREET, EASE SIDE OF MILLIKEN AVENUE; V-196 - APN: 227-151-
73
E6. Approval of Resolution allowing City Engineer to send a Notice of Intent to Purchase Property, to be
funded by developer, in response to a Caltrans offer to sell pursuant to Government Code 54220 through
54227, for property located on the east side of Mulberry Street, south of 210 Freeway and west of
Etiwanda Creek Channel, APN: 228-011-18 and -29.
City Council Minutes
July 21, 2004
Page 5
RESOLUTION NO. 04-228
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER
TO SEND NOTICE OF INTENT TO PURCHASE PROPERTY ON THE
EAST SIDE OF MULBERRY STREET, SOUTH OF THE 210 FREEWAY
AND WEST OF ETIWANDA CREEK CHANNEL
E7. Approval for the purchase of one lot of lobby furniture for Central Park from Lloyd Henry Interior
Systems, Inc., of Montrose, CA, in the amount of $79,044 and appropriation of $79,044 from the Park
Development Fund balance into Fund 1120305-5200. REMOVED FROM AGENDA.
E8. Approval of a Request from Valley Baseball Inc. (Quakes) and Baseballers Against Drugs (BAD) for
a Waiver of Fees and Charges for a Free Youth Baseball Clinic at the Rancho Cucamonga Stadium on
August 3, 2004.
E9. Approval of Amendment to (CO#03-100) agreement with Dan Guerra & Associates for Increased
Scope of Work to Include Additional Staking Services for the Central Park Landscape and Irrigation
Project.
El0. Approval of an Amendment to the Ground Lease between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and J.
Filippi Winery for property located at 12467 Base Line Road.
El1. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security, Ordering the Annexation to
Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 and Summarily
Ordering the Vacation (V-197) of Peach Tree Lane and disposition of City-owned property by quitclaiming
Lot A and a portion of Lot B of Tract 9588, for Tract 16430 located on the west side of Archibald Avenue
between Wilson Avenue and Hillside Road, submitted by Archibald Ventures, LLC.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-229
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER
16430, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND SECURITY
RESOLUTION NO. 04-230
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF
CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1
AND 2 FOR TRACT 16430
RESOLUTION NO. 04-231
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE
VACATION (V-197) OF PEACH TREE LANE AND DISPOSITION OF
CITY-OWNED PROPERTY BY QUITCLAIMING LOT A AND A
PORTION OF LOT B OF TRACT 9588
E12. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and Ordering the Annexation to
Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. I and 7 for Tract Map
16113, located on the west side of East Avenue, south of Wilson Avenue, submitted by Trimark Pacific
Rancho Cucamonga, LLC.
City Council Minutes
July 21,2004
Page 6
RESOLUTION NO. 04-232
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP 16113,
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES
RESOLUTION NO. 04-233
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF
CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 7 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1
AND 7 FOR TRACT MAP 16113
E13. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities for Public Street
Improvements and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Light
Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 for Parcel Map 16167, located at the southeast corner of Vineyard
Avenue and 9th Street, submitted by ON Vineyard, LLC.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-234
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP 16167,
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES
FOR PUBLIC STREET IMPROVEMENTS
RESOLUTION NO. 04-235
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF
CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1
AND 2 FOR PARCEL MAP 16167
E14. Approval to award the execution of a contract in the amount of $166,555.55 to Global Presenter
(CO 04-093) of Huntington Beach, and authorize the expenditure of a contingency in the amount of
$12,481.91 for an AudioNisual Presentation System Upgrade for the City Council Chambers and to
furnish and install an AudioJisual Presentation System for the Emergency Operations Center (EOC) and
authorize an appropriation of $21,475.00 from the COPS/Dreier EOC Grant to Acct. No. 1382105-5603
and an appropriation of $66,171.76 ($61,998.10 plus a 5% contingency of $4,173.66) to Acct. No.
2624801-5650/1348624-6314 for the EOC System (total cost of $83,473.10 plus contingency of
$1,173.66), and approval of a transfer from Acct. No. 2650801-9624 to Acct. No. 262400-8650 in the
amount of $66,171.76.
E15. Approval of a Professional Services Agreement with Associated Engineers, Inc. (CO 04-094), Dan
Guerra & Associates (CO 04-095), Dawson Surveying, Inc. (CO 04-096), and SB&O, Inc. (CO 04-097) to
provide Annual Construction Survey Services for FY 2004/2005, with an option to renew annually up to
an additional two years after review of fees and mutual agreement of both parties, for proposed Capital
Improvement Projects through the City, for a total not to exceed $500,000 annually, to be funded from
various individual project accounts.
E16. Approval of Professional Services Agreements with Krazan & Associates, Inc. (CO 04-098), Ninyo
& Moore (CO 04-099), and RMA Group (CO 04-100) to provide annual soils and material testing services
for FY 2004/2005, with an option to renew annually up to an additional two years after review of fees and
mutual agreement of both parties, for proposed Capital Improvement Projects throughout the City, for a
total not to exceed $500,000 annually, to be funded from various individual project accounts.
City Council Minutes
July 21,2004
Page 7
E17. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, and file a Notice of
Completion for Improvements for DRC2001-00719, located at the east side of the southern terminus of
Hyssop Drive, east of the I-15 Freeway, submitted by Erin Madison, Inc.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-236
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2001-00719 AND AUTHORIZING THE
FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
E18. Approval of release of a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for Parcel Map
13692, located on the nodh side of Northridge Drive, west of Haven Avenue.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-237
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING OF REAL PROPERTY
IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FOR PARCEL
MAP 13692, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF NORTHRIDGE
DRIVE, WEST OF HAVEN AVENUE
E19. Approval to accept the Carnelian Street Storm Drain and Street Rehabilitation Improvements from
Vivero Street to 19th Street, Contract No. 03-058 as complete, release the bonds, accept a Maintenance
Bond, and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract'
amount of $2,851,650.37.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-238
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE CARNELIAN STREET
STORM DRAIN AND STREET REHABILITATION IMPROVEMENTS
FROM VIVERO STREET TO 19TH STREET, CONTRACT NO. 03-058
AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION
FOR THE WORK
E20. Disapproval of Final Map for Tract Map 16114, located on the east side of East Avenue, south of
Wilson Avenue, submitted by Trimark Pacific Rancho Cucamonga, LLC
RESOLUTION NO. 04-239
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DISAPPROVING TRACT MAP 16114
MOTION: Moved by Kurth, seconded by Williams to approve the staff recommendations in the staff
reports contained within the Consent Calendar. Motion carried 5-0.
[I F. CONSENT ORDINANCES
No Items Submitted.
City Council Minutes
July 21,2004
Page 8
II ~. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
Gl. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND ANNEXATION DRC2003-01051 - TRAIGH PACIFIC;, -
A proposed Annexation of approximately 240 acres of land into the City of Rancho Cucamonga, located
within the Etiwanda North Specific Plan north of the lower SCE corridor between Etiwanda Avenue and
East Avenue - APN: 0225-083-05, 06, 07, 10, 21 thru 26 and 0225-084-02 and 03. Related Files:
Tentative Tract Map SUBTT14749, Etiwanda North Specific Plan Amendment DRC2003-00409, General
Plan Amendment DRC2003-00410, and Development Agreement DRC2003-00411.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2003-00410 -
TRAIGH PACIFIC - A proposed General Plan Amendment of approximately 168.77 acres of land from
Very Low Residential (.1-2 dwelling units per acre), to Low residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and
Conservation, for land located north of the SCE corridor between Etiwanda Avenue and East Avenue -
APN: 0225-083-05, 06, 07, 10, 22, 23, 25, and 26 and 0225-084-02. Related Files: Annexation
DRC2003-01051, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT14749, Etiwanda North Specific Plan Amendment
DRC2003-00409 and Development Agreement DRC2003-00411.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT
DRC2003-00409 - TRAIGH PACIFIC - A proposed Etiwanda North Specific Plan Amendment of
approximately 168.77 acres of land from Very Low Residential (.1-2 dwelling units per acre), to Low
residential {2-4 dwelling units per acre) and Flood Control/Resource Conservation and master-planned
circulation modifications to the north, for land located north of the SCE corridor between Etiwanda
Avenue and East Avenue - APN: 0225-083-05, 06, 07, 10, 22, 23, 25 and 26 and 0225-084-02. Related
Files: Annexation DRC2003-01051, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT14749, General Plan Amendment
DRC2003-00410 and Development Agreement DRC2003~00411.
CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND TENTATIVE TRACT
MAP SUBTT14749 - TRAIGH PACIFIC - A proposed subdivision of 168.77 acres into 269 residential lots
and a remainder parcel in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and Flood Control
within the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, located north of the SCE corridor between Etiwanda Avenue and
East Avenue - APN: 0225-083-05, 06, 07, 10, 22, 23, 25, and 26 and 0225-084-02. Related Files:
Annexation DRC2003-01051, Etiwanda North Specific Plan Amendment DRC2003-00409, General Plan
Amendment DRC2003-00410, and Development Agreement DRC2003-00411.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2003-00411 - TRAIGH
PACIFIC - A proposed Development Agreement to address specific conditions of development and
annexation for 168.77 acres of land within the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, located north of the SCE
corridor between Etiwanda Avenue and East Avenue- APN: 0225-083-05, 06, 07, 10, 22, 23, 25, and 26
and 0226-084-02. Related Files: Annexation DRC2003-1051, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT14749,
Etiwanda North Specific Plan Amendment DRC2003-00409 and General Plan Amendment DRC2003-
00410.
A staff report was presented by Larry Henderson, Principal Planner. Mr. Henderson introduced Kent
Norton, consultant, who informed the Council on environmental issues. He referred to a letter that was
included in the agenda packet.
Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council were:
Craig Page, Traigh Pacific, stated he started working on this project with the County and has now
worked with the City to complete it. He stated it is consistent with adjacent projects that have
recently been approved. He stated they have reviewed the conditions of approval and they are
acceptable to the applicant. He respectfully request that the Council deny the appeal of the
tentative map, certify the EIR, approve the General Plan and Etiwanda North Specific Plan
Amendments and authorize annexation in the Development Agreement.
City Council Minutes
July 21, 2004
Page 9
John Lyons stated he keeps waiting for the Council to increase densities. He did not feel there
was much planning for flooding in the Etiwanda area and stated it is in the flood plain. He stated
he would like to have a wilderness park built on the north end of the City. He stated this would
give the mountain lions a place to go.
Craig Sherman, representing Spirit of the Sage and Habitat Trust, Inc., stated he faxed
information which was distributed to the Council and that he would provide the original documents
to be included in the record. He felt the City needs to figure out how they want their General Plan
to be so things are not done piece meal. He felt there needed to be a water study done to make
sure there is enough water for this new development. He did not feel the Development
Agreement was circulated according to CEQA. He did not feel the impacts have been addressed
through the EIR. He felt the sewer issue should also be addressed,
Chuck Buquet stated this is the North Etiwanda area under the Etiwanda Specific Plan. He
stated this project does meet the high standards of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. He stated he
would love to see this developed under the City rather than the County. He thanked the
developer for that.
Vicky Vaughn, Sacramento Street and from the Alta Loma Riding Club, stated the equestrian
center is a great part of this plan and is just what they need. She stated it will open up trails for
them. She felt the Council should go ahead with this project.
There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed.
Councilmember Gutierrez asked how much mitigation was done by the developer as it relates to open
space for this project.
Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, stated they are providing 164 acres of offsite mitigation land.
Councilmember Gutierrez asked how many acres the City has of open space bordering these
developments.
Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, stated considering all of the annexations the Council has been
brought for approval, there are 365.7 acres.
Councilmember Gutierrez inquired how much land is in the North Etiwanda Preserve.
Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, stated there are over 900 acres. He also stated there are 1,200
acres in the Day Creek Preserve and 800 acres in the flood control district that is being set aside as
conservation areas as part of the San Sevaine flood control improvement project.
Councilmember Gutierrez stated this is over 3,000 acres and asked if it is contiguous.
Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, stated most of it is contiguous.
Councilmember Gutierrez stated he just wants the public to know there is an effort with the County
through these approximate 3,000 acres to preserve this open space that can be used for wildlife. He
wanted to make this point so everyone is aware of this.
Councilmember Howdyshell felt this is a super project and agreed with the comments made by the Alta
Loma Riding Club.
Councilmember Kurth felt by doing this it allowed the City to take control of this area. He felt the
standards can be held high.
Councilmember Williams echoed what had been said. She wanted to thank County Supervisor,' Paul
Biane, for his cooperation and continued work on this.
City Council Minutes
July 21,2004
Page 10
Mayor Alexander stated he appreciated what Mr. Lyons stated. He felt his was the best alternative out
there and felt it was a win/win situation. He stated there are wild land areas in the City where there are
streams, walking paths, trees, etc.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-240
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THE FINAL
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PREPARED FOR THE TRACY
RESIDENTIAL PROJECT, WHICH INCLUDES THE ANNEXATION OF
APPROXIMATELY 240 ACRES, A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT,
ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
SUBTT14749, AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, FOR A
RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 168.77 ACRES INTO 269 LOTS FOR
SINGLE-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT, WITHIN THE VERY LOW
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (.1-2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE
ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED NORTH OF THE
LOWER SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON (SCE) CORRIDOR
BETWEEN ETIWANDA AVENUE AND EAST AVENUE - APN: 0225-
083-05, 06, 07, 10, 22, 23, 25 AND 26 AND 0225-084-02
RESOLUTION NO. 04-241
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING INTENT TO PURSUE A
CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION AND REQUESTING THE LOCAL
AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION TO INITIATE PROCEEDINGS
FOR THE ANNEXATION OF PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED
NORTH OF THE LOWER SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON (SCE)
CORRIDOR BETWEEN ETIWANDA AVENUE AND EAST AVENUE, AS
DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A," DEPICTED IN EXHIBIT "B," AND
OUTLINED IN EXHIBIT "C," THE PLAN OF SERVICES
RESOLUTION NO. 04-242
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT DRC2003-00410, TO CHANGE THE GENERAL PLAN
LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL (.1-2
DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW RESIDENTIAL (2-4
DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND CONSERVATION FOR 168.77
ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED NORTH OF THE LOWER SOUTHERN
CALIFORNIA EDISON (SCE) CORRIDOR BETWEEN ETIWANDA
AVENUE AND EAST AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF - APN: 0225-083-05, 06, 07, 10, 22, 23, 25, AND 26 AND
0225-084-02
RESOLUTION NO. 04-243
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING AN APPEAL OF THE
PLANNING COMMISSION'S APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
SUBTT14749 FOR A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 168.77 ACRES
INTO 269 LOTS FOR SINGLE-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT, WITHIN THE
VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (.1-2 DWELLING UNITS PER
ACRE) OF THE ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED
NORTH OF THE LOWER SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON (SCE)
CORRIDOR BETWEEN ETIWANDA AVENUE AND EAST AVENUE
City Council Minutes
July 21, 2004
Page 11
AND APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT14749 FOR A
RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 168.77 ACRES INTO 269 LOTS FOR
SINGLE-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT, WITHIN THE VERY LOW
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (.1-2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE
ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED NORTH OF THE
LOWER SCE CORRIDOR BETWEEN ETIWANDA AVENUE AND EAST
AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN:
0225-083-05, 06, 07, 10, 22, 23, 25, AND 26 AND 0225-084-02
MOTION: Moved by Kurth, seconded by Howdyshell to approve Resolution Nos. 04-240, 04-241, 04-242
and 04-243. Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the titles or Ordinance Nos. 729 and 730.
ORDINANCE NO. 729 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ETIWANDA NORTH
SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2003-00409, TO CHANGE THE
DISTRICT DESIGNATION FROM VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL (.1-2
DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW RESIDENTIAL (2-4
DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND FLOOD CONTROL/RESOURCE
CONSERVATION FOR 168.77 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED NORTH
OF THE LOWER SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON (SCE)
CORRIDOR BETWEEN ETIWANDA AVENUE AND EAST AVENUE;
AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0225-083-
05, 06, 07, 10, 22, 23, 25, AND 26 AND 0225-084-02
ORDINANCE NO. 730 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT DRC2003-00411, A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND TRAIGH
PACIFIC, FOR THE PURPOSE OF DEVELOPING AN APPROXIMATE
168.77 ACRE SITE WITH UP TO 269 RESIDENTIAL LOTS, FOR
PROPERTIES GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF THE SOUTHERN
CALIFORNIA EDISON (SCE) CORRIDOR BETWEEN ETIWANDA
AVENUE AND EAST AVENUE - APN: 0225-083-05, 06, 07, 10, 22, 23,
25, AND 26 AND 0225-084-02
MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Kurth to waive full reading and set second reading of
Ordinance Nos. 729 and 730 for the August 4, 2004 meeting. Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
[] U. PUBLIC HEARINGS ]
No Items Submitted.
City Council Minutes
July 21,2004
Page 12
II ~. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF ~PORTS I
I1. STATUS OF EMERGENCY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES - BELLA VISTA PROJECT
Staff report presented by Joe O'Neil, City Engineer.
Councilmember Gutierrez asked if they are proceeding as if the City has the funding.
Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated they will be looking for the funding as they proceed with the plan.
Councilmember Howdyshell inquired how long this will take to do the work.
Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated this is a very short stretch of property so it would probably not take more
than three months to get it done, but felt it could probably be done quicker.
Councilmember Howdyshell asked if the ownership on the land is solved.
Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated the City does not have any dedication from the property owners. He
indicated they have talked to them and they have advised they are willing to do this, but added they have
not actually seen the plans as yet and do not know the impact it will have on them.
Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public comments. Addressing the City Council were:
Earl Anderson, Bella Vista, stated he was here tonight with many of the residents that live on Bella
Vista. He stated he is pleased with what he has heard. He felt the major thing that needs to be
done is for the Council to find the funds so that it this is completed by December. He stated he is
frustrated and asked what the Council can do to approve the necessary money to go forward to get
this completed.
Mayor Alexander pointed out the equestrian and riding trails are development funded. He started he did
not want people to think the City has so much money they are building trails all over because it is up to a
developer to do this. He stated the City is committed, but felt it was also the homeowner's responsibility
to assist with this.
Sharon Mor[f, Bella Vista, asked what they can do to get funds from the Council to get this project
taken care of.
Mayor Alexander stated the City is doing everything they can do to find the funding.
Jack Lam, City Manager, explained how capital funding works. He stated if no capital funds can be
found, then they have to find other sources.
ACTION: Report received and filed.
12. CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL OF HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2003-00961 - LYNNE AND
RENEE MASSEY
Staff report presented by Brad Buller, City Planner.
Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City council were:
Wendy Stachowiak stated they are trying to make everyone happy with this. She stated they are
trying to get their home built so their children have a place to live. She stated they do care about
their neighbors and their views. She stated the new design is not exactly what they wanted, and
that it is costing them thousands for the redesign work.
City Council Minutes
July 21, 2004
Page 13
An unidentified woman stated she has not heard from anyone in the last two weeks. She
questioned if this was approved for result or effort. She stated if it was approved for effort, the
Stachowiak's were led through a City process and made the effort and it is not their fault. She
stated if it was approved for result, the project meets the minimum requirements and should have
been planned better. She asked if that is good enough. She stated they want to work with
everyone so they are all happy.
Mike Schneider, Engineer for the project, stated on Monday they submitted some plans to Brad
Bullet stating the roof has been lowered on this house. He asked instead of approving the
appeal, the Council allow them the opportunity to meet with the Masi's and show them their new
plans so they can come up with a solution for everyone.
Chuck Buquet stated he disagreed with Mr. Schneider and did not feel his calculations are
correct. He stated the suggestion for dropping the roof will still not make a difference. He stated
they have been working on these types of issues for a number of years for this area. He stated
he blames the people that sell these lots for not disclosing all of the information about the
property. He felt they should be able to go back through the p¢ocess and not pay the fees.
Mr. Stachowiak stated he has complied with all City regulations and did not feel someone should
be able to come in now and say this is not approved. He felt this was unfair. He asked the
Council to reconsider their previous decision and deny the appeal and let him build his home.
Jim Ford, Predera Court, commented on how his view could be completely obstructed depending
on how lots around his home are built. He thinks everyone should be entitled to keep their view,
even if you have lived in your home for awhile.
There being no further input, public comments were closed.
Mayor Alexander asked if there is a regulation about not being able to block a view in Red Hill.
Brad Bullet, City Planner, stated we do not have an Ordinance that states what views are to be protected,
but stated what came out at a previous meeting is that the Hillside Standards talk about view as being an
important element when reviewing hillside projects.
Mayor Alexander felt people should be told this. He stated he still felt it was irresponsible for the Council
to accept the appeal and put these people in jeopardy. He stated it was unfair. He felt this should be
continued so that there is some type of resolution.
Councilmember Williams stated the Design Review Committee had asked for certain changes, but did not
feel those had been made. She also felt it should go back to Design Review again and the Planning
Commission so that it is acceptable to the neighborhood. She is afraid this will set the standard if it is
approved.
Brad Buller, City Planner, stated there was disclosure from staff about the history of the property, the last
approval, about the issue of the hillside envelope, and that minimum was not going to be allowed. He
stated there have been many revisions through this process.
Councilmember Williams stated the minutes that have been included with this agenda did not reflect this.
She asked Mr. Bullet if this can be worked through.
Brad Bullet, City Planner, stated yes.
Councilmember Kurth felt this was something that could be worked out, but felt the fees should be
waived.
City Council Minutes
July 21, 2004
Page 14
RESOLUTION NO. 04-244
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REVERSING THE ACTION OF THE
PLANNING COMMISSION AND DENYING THE APPLICATION FOR
HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00961, A REQUEST TO
CONSTRUCT A 3,628 SQUARE FOOT SINGLE-FAMILY HOME ON
LOT 12 OF TRACT 10035 IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4
DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED AT 8045 CAMINO
PREDERA; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN:
0207-631-02
MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Howdyshell to continue the item for one month so things
can be worked out.
Councilmember Gutierrez felt the Council should possibly consider an Ordinance about blocking people's
views.
Councilmember Kurth felt this should go back to Design Review.
Motion carried 4-1 (Kurth voted no).
J1. PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATF
ACTION: Report received and filed.
J2. CONSIDERATION OF LIBRARY SUB-COMMITTEE'S RECOMMENDATIONS FOR NEW BOARD
MEMBER
Councilmember Howdyshell stated they were sorry to hear that Paula Pachon had resigned, but felt
Bruce Bowen will be a great boardmember.
MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Alexander to appoint Bruce Bowen. Motion carried
unanimously 5-0.
II K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR THE NEXT MEETING
K1. Councilmember Kurth mentioned the City Council, just prior to this meeting, saw a taser gun
demonstration, and asked for Captain Ortiz to give a report at a Council meeting in the future.
][ L. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
No communication was made from the public.
City Council Minutes
July 21,2004
Page 15
MOTION: Moved by Kurth, seconded by Gutierrez to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. The
meeting adjourned at g:26 p.m. to closed session, not to reconvene.
Respectfully submitted,
Debra J. Adams, CMC
City Clerk
Approved: *
July 26, 2004
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Special Meetin.q
A special meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Monday, July 26, 2004, in the
Training Room of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Mayor William J. Alexander called the meeting to order at 5:50 p.m.
Present were Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, Robert J. Howdyshell, Donald J. Kurth, M.D., Diane
Williams and Mayor William J. Alexander.
Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Pam Easter, Deputy City Manager; Kevin McArdle,
Community Services Director; Dave Moore, Recreation Superintendent; Francie Martindale, Marketing
Manager; Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III; Kimberly Thomas, Management Analyst II; and Debra
J. Adams, City Clerk.
B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
No communication was made from the public.
II C. ITEM(S) OFBUSINESS I
C1. REVIEW OF PROGRAMMING, POLICIES AND FEES FOR THE CENTRAL PARK SENIOR AND
COMMUNITY CENTER
Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director, stated the purpose of this meeting was to inform the
Council about the history of the project and provide other specific policy information. He informed the
Council about the notebook of information that was distributed. He stated if the Council is in concurrence
with what is in the notebook, he will be taking it to a regular City Council meeting for approval. He also
distributed a budget for Central Park. He stated it also includes Base Line and Milliken improvements.
Councilmember Gutierrez stated he received a call from a man at Etiwanda Gardens who was concerned
about the City selling alcohol at one of the community centers in Central Park. He felt it would be good to
know if it is impodant to be able to sell alcohol to make the center a success. He stated he was leaning
towards allowing alcohol, but would listen to all arguments about this.
Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director, stated it is being recommended to approve a limited
amount of alcohol be allowed because it is a high request from the public. He stated they receive many
requests from the public about the serving of alcohol. He stated as far as competition, people are
wanting the City to be flexible, where they can cook their own food, bring in their own ice sculptures, etc.
On the other hand, he stated some people want someone to do everything for them. He added that rental
revenues depend upon alcohol being sold.
Councilmember Kurth asked about how much business would the City be taking away from other
businesses.
Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director, stated he does not know.
City Council Minutes
July 26, 2004
Page 2
Mayor Alexander felt the public sector should be able to look at the City Council's recommendations on
this before it is approved.
Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director, stated the Fee Resolution will be brought back to the
Council at the August 4 meeting and then the August 18 meeting agenda will include the Ordinance
pertaining to allowing alcohol at the park.
Councilmember Gutierrez inquired of the City Manager if he felt allowing alcohol was needed to make this
profitable.
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated the original project included the sale of alcohol. He stated they feel the
market is so great and the need is there for many facilities to allow alcohol.
Mayor Alexander felt we should be able to explain to people why we are proposing this. He asked if there
is a way to gauge what we are taking away from other businesses.
Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director, stated he did not know.
Mayor Alexander stated he did not want to undercut anyone.
Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director, stated he felt our fees were on an even scale with other
facilities. He stated we will let other facilities know about the City's intent to sell alcohol.
Councilmember Williams felt the City will come out ahead over private enterprise because the City does
not have to pay for assessment district fees, construction loans, etc. like other businesses do.
Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director, brought up that Central Park can be used for the Gala,
Library Telethon, and other City events.
Councilmember Gutierrez stated he would love to know what the impact will be on Etiwanda Gardens.
Mayor Alexander felt he does not want to undercut Etiwanda Gardens.
Councilmember Howdyshell stated it would be interesting to know of all the phone calls received, if any of
those people went to other cities to get a facility. He stated it would also be interesting to know how many
Rancho clientele other cities are serving. He stated if those numbers are high this would be a gain for
everybody, and he assumed they would be.
Mayor Alexander stated he favored beer, wine and champagne.
Councilmember Williams stated she does not necessarily agree with the sale of beer, wine and
champagne. She stated she was surprised about lhe size of the "Y" facilities. She stated there is no
playground and was surprised to see the plan. She felt what was planned is a convention center. She
stated all of these services will be overwhelming and we will need to hire more people.
Jack Lam, City Manager stated this is as large a senior center as possible and if anything, this is where
more people will be needed. He stated it is not a convention center, but a community center. He stated
as far as the "Y," this is what was negotiated. He stated what is in the plan is what was represented two
to three years ago when this was started.
Councilmember Williams stated she misunderstood what the "Y" would be doing at this park. She stated
she is disappointed about youth activities at the park. She wished there would be playground equipment
for the neighborhood kids. She felt we owed this to the neighborhood.
Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director, stated they are trying to follow the master plan. He stated
this is a lot of outdoor open space for people to use.
City Council Minutes
July 26, 2004
Page 3
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated the decision for the plans has been made, but we can star[ looking
toward the future for some of these other things.
Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director, stated they are looking for a conceptual approval on the
alcohol issue, the fee issue and the YMCA.
Mayor Alexander felt we should get in touch with the people this may affect, but stated he did agree with
the sale of beer, wine and champagne. He stated he was aware of the design of the park. He also would
like to get input from business competitors on the alcohol sale issue.
Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director, felt everyone will win in this deal. He stated they tried to
design the building so that the rental rooms are shielded off from the rest of the center. He stated the
hours of operation could also be looked at.
Councilmember Kurth did not feel we should compete with local business. He felt the City's facilities will
be for people who cannot afford to go to Etiwanda Gardens. He did not think this would be competition
for Etiwanda Gardens.
Councilmember Williams felt Best Western Hotel should be included in these discussions also.
Mayor Alexander asked if the majority of the Council agree with the information as long as other facilities
are talked to, and includes some kind of outdoor activities to be looked into at the "Y."
Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public input. Addressing the City Council was:
Lou Munos, Park and Recreation Commission, thanked the staff, Mayor and Council and stated if
there are any concerns the Council has, he will be happy to take them to the Park and Recreation
Commission.
The meeting adjourned at 6:50 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Debra J. Adams, CMC
City Clerk
Approved: *
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/27/2004 through 8/10/2004
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00213029 7/28/2004 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 5,876.97
AP - 00213030 7/28/2004 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 175.80
AP - 00213030 7/28/2004 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 19.17
AP - 002 ! 3030 7/28/2004 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 56.57
AP - 00213030 7/28/2004 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 631.40
AP - 00213031 7/28/2004 AA EQUIPMJ2NT 1,290.84
AP- 00213032 7/28/2004 ABC LOCKSMITHS 112.91
AP - 00213033 7/28/2004 ABLETRONICS 9.68
AP - 00213035 7/28/2004 AES 450.00
AP - 00213036 7/28/2004 ALL WELDING 646.50
AP - 00213037 7/28/2004 AMERICAN CLASSIC SANITATION 213.45
AP - 00213037 7/28/2004 AMERICAN CLASSIC SANITATION 69.70
AP - 00213038 7/28/2004 AMERICAN RED CROSS 480.00
AP - 00213040 7/28/2004 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 410.00
AP - 00213040 7/28/2004 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 94.00
AP - 00213040 7/28/2004 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 4,160.00
AP - 00213040 7/28/2004 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 2,925.00
AP - 00213040 7/28/2004 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 1,200.00
AP - 00213040 7/28/2004 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 1,224.00
AP- 00213040 7/28/2004 ARCHITERRADESIGN GROUP 1,152.00
AP - 00213041 7/28/2004 ARLET, SHANNON 40.00
AP - 00213042 7/28/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 630.00
AP - 00213042 7/28/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 64,54
AP - 00213042 7/28/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 52.86
AP - 00213042 7/28/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 152.21
AP - 00213042 7/28/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 77.32
AP - 00213042 7/28/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 139,35
AP - 00213042 7/28/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 82.00
AP - 00213042 7/28/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 51.16
AP - 00213042 7/28/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 47.80
AP - 00213042 7/28/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION -341.16
AP - 00213042 7/28/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 37.60
AP - 00213042 7/28/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 225.46
AP - 00213042 7/28/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 690.00
AP - 00213042 7/28/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 690.00
AP - 00213042 7/28/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 217.90
AP - 00213042 7/28/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 20.37
AP - 00213042 7/28/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 117.08
AP - 00213042 7/28/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 314.31
AP - 00213042 7/28/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 233.15
AP - 00213042 7/28/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 266.48
AP - 00213042 7/28/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 2,235.49
AP - 00213042 7/28/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 45.85
AP - 00213042 7/28/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 43.61
AP-00213043 7/28/2004 ASSI SECURITY 1,002.50
AP - 00213044 7/28/2004 ASTRUM UTILITY SERVICES 8,365.00
AP - 00213045 7/28/2004 ATTAR, MONA 80.00
AP - 00213046 7/28/2004 AUFBAU CORPORATION 640.00
AP - 00213046 7/28/2004 AUFBAU CORPORATION 233.75
AP - 00213046 7/28/2004 AUFBAU CORPORATION 10,415.00
AP - 00213046 7/28/2004 AUFBAU CORPORATION 3,645.00
AP - 00213046 7/28/2004 AUFBAIJ CORPORATION 2,535.00
AP - 00213046 7/28/2004 AUFBAU CORPORATION 233.75
User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: I Current Date: 08/11/20C
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: a 08:50:1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/27/2004 through 8/10/2004
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00213046 7/28/2004 AUFBAU CORPORATION 467.50
AP - 00213046 7/28/2004 AUFBAU CORPORATION 3,675.00
AP - 00213046 7/28/2004 AUFBAU CORPORATION 352.00
AP - 00213046 7/28/2004 AUFBAU CORPORATION 10,462.00
AP - 00213047 7/28/2004 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 8.69
AP - 00213048 7/28/2004 BACHMAN, MIKE 40.00
AP - 00213049 7/28/2004 BACKER, KARRI 32.00
AP - 00213050 7/28/2004 BAILEY, KELLIE 40.00
AP - 00213051 7/28/2004 BAMBANG, SRI 27.50
AP- 00213052 7/28/2004 BANKS, TIA 35.00
AP 00213052 7/28/2004 BANKS, TIA 200.00
AP 00213053 7/28/2004 BARKER, AMANDA 15.00
AP 00213054 7/28/2004 BARNES AND NOBLE 88.06
AP 00213054 7/28/2004 BARNES AND NOBLE 900.53
AP 00213055 7/28/2004 BARNHART INC 597,285.13
AP 00213055 7/28/2004 BARNHART INC 166,384.34
AP 00213055 7/28/2004 BARNHART INC -16,638.43
AP 00213055 7/28/2004 BARNHART INC -22,362.50
AP 00213055 7/28/2004 BARNIiART INC -52,786.07
AP 00213055 7/28/2004 BARNHART [NC 245,987.50
AP 00213056 7/28/2004 BECK, DENISE 80.00
AP 00213057 7/28/2004 BENITEZ, MAGDALENA 200.00
AP 00213058 7/28/2004 BICKIYA, AMIR 40.00
AP 00213059 7/28/2004 BOWERS, SHARONNE 67.00
AP 00213060 7/28/2004 BP, EST, KERI 40.00
AP 00213061 7/28/2004 BROCK, BONNIE 32.00
AP 00213062 7/28/2004 BRODARTBOOKS 4,107.22
AP 00213062 7/28/2004 BRODART BOOKS 2,990.48
AP 00213063 7/28/2004 BROWN, ANNETTE 126.00
AP 00213064 7/28/2004 BUBALO CONSTRUCTION CO,STEVE 74,274.00
AP 00213064 7/28/2004 BUBALOCONSTRUCTIONCO,STEVE 11,175.50
AP - 00213065 7/28/2004 BURTON, BRIGETTE 80.00
AP 00213066 7/28/2004 BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC 14,108.40
AP 00213066 7/28/2004 BUTSKOUTILITYDESIGNINC 4,373.10
AP 00213067 7/28/2004 C.W. DRIVER CONTRACTORS 20,452.00
AP 00213068 7/28/2004 CALIFORNIA CODE CHECK1NC. 2,765.00
AP 00213069 7/28/2004 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 2,691.28
AP 00213070 7/28/2004 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 3,974.00
AP 00213071 7/28/2004 CAM~RON WELDING SUPPLY 17.92
AP 00213072 7/28/2004 CAMPOS, GRICELDA 40.00
AP 00213073 7/28/2004 CAZESSUS, MANUEL 88.00
AP 00213074 7/28/2004 CERTIPIED AUTO CARE 174.67
AP 00213074 7/28/2004 CERTIFIED AUTO CARE 26.83
AP 00213075 7/28/2004 CHARTER MEDIA 331.00
AP - 00213075 7/28/2004 CHARTER MEDIA 696.00
AP - 00213075 7/28/2004 CHARTER MEDIA 841.00
AP - 00213076 7/28/2004 CHE, ANH 36.00
AP - 00213077 7/28/2004 Cf-lEON, SUNNY 45.00
AP - 00213078 7/28/2004 JACKSON, CHRASHAWN 20.00
AP - 00213079 7/28/2004 CONCENTRA MEDICAL CENTERS 91.15
AP - 002~3079 7/28/2004 CONCENTRA MEDICAL CENTERS l 1.69
AP - 00213080 7/28/2004 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS ] 1,337.79
AP - 00213081 7/28/2004 CORONA CLAY COMPANY 1,010.16
User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 2 Current Date: 08/11/20C
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT~RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:50:1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/27/2004 through 8/10/2004
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00213082 7/28/2004 CORTES, EDDIE 200.00
AP - 00213084 7/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 485.18
AP - 00213084 7/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 636.98
AP - 00213084 7/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 35.13
AP 00213084 7/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 218.38
AP 00213084 7/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 108.73
AP 00213084 7/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 110.14
AP 00213084 7/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 125.33
AP 00213084 7/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 101.18
AP 00213084 7/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 725.36
AP - 00213084 7/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,006.12
AP - 00213084 7/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.93
AP ~ 00213084 7/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 394.43
AP - 00213084 7/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 541.63
AP- 00213084 7/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2,101.18
AP - 00213084 7/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 98.88
AP - 00213084 7/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 467.58
AP - 00213084 7/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 254.13
AP - 00213084 7/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 270. I3
AP - 00213084 7/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 23.63
AP - 00213084 7/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 225.34
AP - 00213084 7/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 225.34
AP - 00213084 7/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 553.13
AP - 00213084 7/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 608.23
AP - 00213084 7/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 194.23
AP - 00213084 7/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 494.38
AP - 00213084 7/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 14.88
AP - 00213084 7/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 341.48
AP - 00213084 7/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 139.03
AP - 00213084 7/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 141.33
AP - 00213084 7/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,407.92
AP - 00213084 7/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 171.23
AP - 00213084 7/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 229.88
AP - 00213084 7/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 335.68
AP - 00213084 7/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 164.33
AP - 00213084 7/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 197.68
AP - 00213084 7/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 270.13
AP - 00213084 7/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 126.38
AP - 00213084 7/28/2004 CUCA/VIONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 353.03
AP - 00213084 7/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 409.28
AP - 00213084 7/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 229.88
AP - 00213084 7/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 137.88
AP - 00213084 7/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2,748.25
AP - 00213084 7/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 766.59
AP - 00213084 7/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 156.77
AP - 00213084 7/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,259.13
AP - 00213084 7/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 587.53
AP - 00213084 7/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 185.48
AP - 00213084 7/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 470.23
AP - 00213084 7/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 220.68
AP - 00213084 7/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 29.38
AP - 00213084 7/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 631.23
AP - 00213084 7/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 145.93
User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 3 Current Date: 08/11/20C
Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: ~,~ 08:50:1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/27/2004 through 8/10/2004
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00213084 7/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 144.78
AP - 00213084 7/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 512.78
AP - 00213084 7/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 909.53
AP - 00213084 7/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 550.73
AP - 00213084 7/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 106.93
AP - 00213084 7/28/2004 CIJCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,368.00
AP 00213084 7/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 473.78
AP 00213084 7/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 87.73
AP 00213085 7/28/2004 CYBERCOMRESOURCESINC 4,060.00
AP 00213085 7/28/2004 CYBERCOMRESOURCESINC 700.00
AP 00213085 7/28/2004 CYBERCOMRESOURCESINC 805.00
AP 00213085 7/28/2004 CYBERCOM RESOURCES INC 350.00
AP - 00213085 7/28/2004 CYBERCOM RESOURCES INC 140.00
AP - 00213085 7/28/2004 CYBERCOM RESOURCES INC 70.00
AP - 00213086 7/28/2004 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 11,195.00
AP - 00213086 7/28/2004 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 13,255.63
AP - 00213087 7/28/2004 DAVIS, GEORGE 175.00
AP- 00213088 7/28/2004 DAVIS, KESSEL 40.00
AP - 00213089 7/28/2004 DEER CREEK CAR CARE CENTER 73.50
AP - 00213091 7/28/2004 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 73.75
AP - 00213092 7/28/2004 DUVALL, KAREN 76.00
AP - 00213093 7/28/2004 EASI FILE MANUFACTURING CORP 1,547.88
AP - 00213094 7/28/2004 ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEMS 4,471.70
AP - 00213094 7/28/2004 ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEMS 10,220.75
AP - 00213096 7/28/2004 EOM, YUN WON 40.00
AP - 00213097 7/28/2004 ESHANZADA, ROYA 49.00
AP - 00213097 7/28/2004 ESHANZADA, ROYA 5.00
AP- 00213098 7/28/2004 EVANS SPORTING GOODS 921.59
AP- 00213099 7/28/2004 EXCLUSIVEEMAGES 129.30
AP- 00213100 7/28/2004 FOREMOST 474.23
AP- 00213100 7/28/2004 FOREMOST 474.24
AP- 00213101 7/28/2004 FROST, CINDY 40.00
AP- 00213102 7/28/2004 GIBSON, KATHLEEN 48.00
AP- 00213103 7/28/2004 GLOVER, BRYON 81.00
AP - 00213104 7/28/2004 GOLF VENTURES WEST 66.20
AP- 00213104 7/28/2004 GOLF VENTURES WEST 533.10
AP - 00213104 7/28/2004 GOLF VENTURES WEST 308.77
AP- 00213105 7/28/2004 GRAVES AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLY 815.88
AP - 00213105 7/28/2004 GRAVES AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLY -34.91
AP - 00213105 7/28/2004 GRAVES AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLY 266.79
AP - 00213106 7/28/2004 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 646.50
AP - 00213106 7/28/2004 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPIVI~NT 344.79
AP - 00213106 7/28/2004 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 430.99
AP - 00213106 7/28/2004 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 4.10
AP - 00213107 7/28/2004 GRIDER, JESSICA 40.00
AP - 00213108 7/28/2004 HADIPOUR, ELAHEH 72.00
AP- 00213109 7/28/2004 HALE, LISA 40.00
AP - 00213110 7/28/2004 HANNEMANN, ALICIA 40.00
AP - 00213111 7/28/2004 HARBOUR, DELV1N 367.00
AP - 00213112 7/28/2004 HAWKINS, KAREL 56.00
AP- 00213113 7/28/2004 HOLLIST, KATHY 95.00
AP - 00213114 7/28/2004 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 409.18
AP - 00213114 7/28/2004 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 149.77
User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 4 Current Date: 08/11/20G
Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:., 08:50:1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/27/2004 through 8/10/2004
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00213114 7/28/2004 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 126.32
AP - 00213114 7/28/2004 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 17.13
AP- 00213115 7/28/2004 HOSE MAN INC 53.48
AP - 00213115 7/28/2004 HOSE MAN INC 116.99
AP- 00213115 7/28/2004 HOSE MAN INC 49.61
AP - 00213116 7/28/2004 tIOYT LUMBER CO., SM 366.33
AP - 00213117 7/28/2004 HUBBARD, CAROL 95.00
AP - 00213118 7/28/2004 HUGHES, JANET 40.00
AP- 00213119 7/28/2004 HUNTiNGTON HARDWARE 416.86
AP - 00213119 7/28/2004 HUNTINGTON HARDWARE 303.97
AP - 00213120 7/28/2004 HUSSAIN, NAZMUN 40.00
AP- 00213121 7/28/2004 IGOE, TAMMY 28.00
AP - 00213124 7/28/2004 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 289.80
AP - 00213124 7/28/2004 INLAND VALLEY DALLY BULLETIN 66.70
AP - 00213124 7/28/2004 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 316.25
AP - 00213124 7/28/2004 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 71.30
AP - 00213124 7/28/2004 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 602.60
AP - 00213124 7/28/2004 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 433.55
AP - 00213124 7/28/2004 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 171.35
AP - 00213124 7/28/2004 INLAND VALLEY DALLY BULLETIN 85.10
AP - 00213124 7/28/2004 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 621.00
AP - 00213124 7/28/2004 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETiN 1,775.60
AP - 00213124 7/28/2004 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETiN 265.65
AP - 00213124 7/28/2004 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETiN 104.65
AP - 00213124 7/28/2004 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 73.60
AP - 00213124 7/28/2004 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 554.30
AP - 00213124 7/28/2004 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 72.45
AP - 00213124 7/28/2004 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 305.90
AP - 00213124 7/28/2004 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 407.10
AP - 00213125 7/28/2004 INLAND WHOLESALE NURSERY 128.87
AP - 00213125 7/28/2004 INLAND WHOLESALE NURSERY 67.88
AP - 00213126 7/28/2004 JARL, GUNNEL 20.00
AP - 00213127 7/28/2004 JONES AND MAYER LAW OFFICES OF 137.50
AP - 00213128 7/28/2004 KALIN, HENRY 40.00
AP - 00213129 7/28/2004 KANG, KYONG 45.00
AP - 00213130 7/28/2004 KINDERSTUTH, OLIVIER 307.33
AP-00213131 7/28/2004 KLEINFELDERINC 2,106.50
AP - 00213132 7/28/2004 LAIRD CONSTRUCTION CO 4,500.00
AP - 00213132 7/28/2004 LAIRD CONSTRUCTION CO 4,900.00
AP- 00213133 7/28/2004 LASER TECHNOLOGY INC 178.95
AP- 00213134 7/28/2004 LEE, MIKYONG 36.00
AP - 00213135 7/28/2004 LEVENTRY, LACY 6.25
AP- 00213136 7/28/2004 LEYVA, CRYSTAL 25.00
AP - 00213137 7/28/2004 LOPEZ, MAGGIE 20.00
AP- 00213138 7/28/2004 M.S.L. ELECTRIC INC 39.53
AP - 00213139 7/28/2004 MACIEL, MARY 40.00
AP - 00213140 7/28/2004 MADLOCK, MARCELLA 76.00
AP- 00213141 7/28/2004 MALBERG, LARRY 100.00
AP - 00213142 7/28/2004 MARCIEL, PATRICIA 40.00
AP- 00213143 7/28/2004 MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE 45.00
AP - 00213144 7/28/2004 MARTINEZ, JACKQUELINE 83.80
AP - 00213145 7/28/2004 MARTINEZ, JEANETTE 32.00
AP - 00213146 7/28/2004 MARTINEZ, RANDY 45.00
User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 5 Current Date: 08/11/20C
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:,,. 08:50:1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/27/2004 through 8/10/2004
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00213147 7/28/2004 MATAELE, ALANI 1.25
AP - 00213147 7/28/2004 MATAELE, ALANI 100.00
AP - 00213148 7/28/2004 MATTHEW BENDER AND COMPANY INC 853.02
AP - 00213148 7/28/2004 MATTHEW BENDER AND COMPANY INC 72.83
AP - 00213148 7/28/2004 MATTHEW BENDER AND COMPANY INC 500.00
AP - 00213150 7/28/2004 MEGA WAY ENTERPRISES 170,266.00
AP- 00213150 7/28/2004 MEGA WAY ENTERPRISES 33,132.00
AP- 00213150 7/28/2004 MEGA WAY ENTERPRISES -3,313.20
AP- 00213150 7/28/2004 MEGAWAY ENTERPRISES -17,026.60
AP - 00213151 7/28/2004 METKA, GEILAN 36.00
AP- 00213152 7/28/2004 MILLER, JODI 45.00
AP - 00213153 7/28/2004 MINUTEMAN PRESS 569.94
AP - 00213153 7/28/2004 MINUTEMAN PRESS 8.68
AP - 00213154 7/28/2004 MORALES, AGNES 42.00
AP - 00213155 7/28/2004 MORETTI, JAMIE 94.00
AP - 00213156 7/28/2004 MUEGO, LANI 40.00
AP - 00213157 7/28/2004 MURPHY, CHERYL 40.00
AP - 00213159 7/28/2004 NAZIRI, ELIZABETH 80.63
AP - 00213160 7/28/2004 NICASSIO, TONY 45.00
AP - 00213161 7/28/2004 NINYO AND MOORE GEOTECHNICAL 235.00
AP - 00213162 7/28/2004 NISHANIAN, DAWN 95.00
AP - 00213163 7/28/2004 O'BRIEN, STEPHEN 76.00
AP - 00213164 7/28/2004 O'NEIL, KIMBERLY 76.00
AP-00213165 7/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 157.56
AP- 00213165 7/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 119.21
AP- 00213165 7/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT -8.60
AP- 00213165 7/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 4.81
AP- 00213165 7/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 201.56
AP-00213165 7/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 897.16
AP-00213165 7/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 901.43
AP - 00213165 7/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 851.11
AP - 00213165 7/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 35.00
AP - 00213165 7/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 613.69
AP - 00213165 7/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 18.16
AP - 00213165 7/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 42.71
AP - 00213165 7/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 250.27
AP - 00213165 7/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT -106.28
AP- 00213165 7/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT -1.69
AP- 00213165 7/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT -31.92
AP- 00213165 7/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT -18.16
AP - 00213165 7/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 49.07
AP- 00213165 7/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 57.84
AP-00213165 7/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 23.52
AP- 00213165 7/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 58.19
AP- 00213165 7/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 338.16
AP - 00213166 7/28/2004 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 4.07
AP - 00213166 7/28/2004 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 10.37
AP - 00213166 7/28/2004 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 6.45
AP - 00213166 7/28/2004 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE -1.61
AP - 00213166 7/28/2004 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 8.37
AP - 00213166 7/28/2004 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 28.70
AP - 00213167 7/28/2004 ORTIZ, ALBERT 200.00
AP - 00213168 7/28/2004 ORTIZ, ROSANA 80.00
User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 6 Current Date: 08/11/20G
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time' t 08:50:1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/27/2004 through 8/10/2004
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00213169 7/28/2004 OWEN ELECTRIC 217.06
AP- 00213169 7/28/2004 OWEN ELECTRIC 10.72
AP - 00213170 7/28/2004 PARK, MIKYOUNG 40.00
AP- 00213172 7/28/2004 PERRY, DARLA 120.00
AP - 00213173 7/28/2004 PHOENIX GROUP INFORMATION SYSTEMS 549.67
AP- 00213174 7/28/2004 PITTS, WENDY 40.00
AP 00213175 7/28/2004 RHFINC 70.00
AP 00213175 7/28/2004 RHFINC 70.00
AP 00213175 7/28/2004 RHFINC 120.97
AP 00213175 7/28/2004 RHFINC 70.00
AP 00213175 7/28/2004 R HF INC 70.00
AP 00213175 7/28/2004 RHFINC 127.08
AP 00213175 7/28/2004 R HF INC 70.00
AP 00213175 7/28/2004 RHFINC 70.00
AP 00213175 7/28/2004 RHFINC 70.00
AP 00213175 7/28/2004 RHF INC 70.00
AP - 00213175 7/28/2004 R H F INC 50.00
AP - 00213175 7/28/2004 R H F INC 50.00
AP - 00213176 7/28/2004 RAFFA, SUZIE 95.00
AP - 00213177 7/28/2004 RANCHO CUCAMONGA RESERVE UNIT 134 6,278.05
AP - 00213178 7/28/2004 RANDALL, TAMMY 80.00
AP- 00213179 7/28/2004 REZAI, TIBIA 18.80
AP - 00213180 7/28/2004 RHINES, STEPHANIE 80.00
AP- 00213181 7/28/2004 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 171.00
AP - 00213181 7/28/2004 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 1,336.59
AP - 00213181 7/28/2004 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 1,600.00
AP - 00213181 7/28/2004 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 4,100.18
AP - 00213181 7/28/2004 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 1,435.50
AP - 00213181 7/28/2004 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 32.00
AP - 00213181 7/28/2004 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 375.20
AP - 00213181 7/28/2004 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 27.20
AP - 00213181 7/28/2004 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 54.40
AP - 00213181 7/28/2004 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 96.00
AP - 00213181 7/28/2004 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 432.00
AP - 00213182 7/28/2004 RIOS, ANGELINA 52.00
AP- 00213183 7/28/2004 ROBENIOL, LINDA 152.00
AP - 00213184 7/28/2004 RODARTE, SILVIA 200.00
AP - 00213185 7/28/2004 ROLATAPE CORPORATION 199.93
AP - 00213186 7/28/2004 RUSSELL, KELLIE 40.00
AP- 00213187 7/28/2004 SA1D, FADIA 120.00
AP- 00213188 7/28/2004 SAKODA, JOY 65.00
AP - 00213189 7/28/2004 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY AUDITOR CONTR( 525.00
AP - 00213189 7/28/2004 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY AUDITOR CONTR( 700.00
AP - 00213189 7/28/2004 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY AUDITOR CONTR( 525.00
AP - 00213190 7/28/2004 SAN D1EGO NATIONAL BANK 52,786.07
AP - 00213190 7/28/2004 SAN DIEGO NATIONAL BANK 16,638.43
AP - 00213190 7/28/2004 SAN DIEGO NATIONAL BANK 22,362.50
AP- 00213191 7/28/2004 SARGENT PAINTING, TOM 1,900.00
AP - 00213192 7/28/2004 SCHOENFELDER, CHRISTEL 40.00
AP- 00213193 7/28/2004 SILVA, KAREN 40.00
AP - 00213193 7/28/2004 SILVA, KAREN 1.00
AP - 00213194 7/28/2004 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 946.05
AP - 00213195 7/28/2004 SMITH, BARBARA 35.00
User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 7 Current Date: 08/11/20C
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:50:1
7
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/27/2004 through 8/10/2004
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00213196 7/28/2004 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 31.06
AP - 00213196 7/28/2004 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 94.04
AP - 00213203 7]28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 4,807.25
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,834.65
AP 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTI-[ERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.06
AP 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.45
AP 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERNCALIFORNIAEDISON 13.52
AP 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERNCALIFORNIAEDISON 13.33
AP 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90
AP 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.06
AP 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON I2.90
AP 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 87.54
AP 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.37
AP 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 122.68
AP 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90
AP 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.06
AP 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.37
AP 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.52
AP 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.04
AP 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.04
AP 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90
AP 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.21
AP 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.82
AP 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 48.52
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 27.81
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 94.36
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 108.31
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 27.83
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 51.37
AP - 00213203 7~28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 64.68
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.21
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.30
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 116.30
AP ~ 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 45.31
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 85.24
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 43.12
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 85.50
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 85.76
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 109.63
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.76
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.37
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 70.12
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 45.14
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 97.56
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 97.64
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.82
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 90.50
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 106.69
User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 8 Current Date: 08/11/20¢
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC -CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:~..n 08:50:1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/27/2004 through 8/10/2004
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.83
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 9.23
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.06
AP ~ 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.64
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.64
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.33
AP ~ 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.33
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.33
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.11
AP 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.33
AP 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.37
AP 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.26
AP 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 150.38
AP 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.46
AP 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.11
AP 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.38
AP 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.42
AP 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.40
AP 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90
AP 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90
AP 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.09
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.83
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.52
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 307.97
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 104.14
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 808.56
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 94.60
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 59.37
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.52
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.06
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.96
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.92
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.23
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,048.45
AP - 00213203 7/28/20~4 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.04
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.19
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 50.93
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 104.92
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.95
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.06
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 41.90
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1.33
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 106.71
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 116.32
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 127.52
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 129.33
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.68
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 74.60
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.33
User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 9 Current Date: 08/11/20C
Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: ~. 08:50:1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/27/2004 through 8/10/2004
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.52
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.33
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.06
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 36.21
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 30.15
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.33
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.35
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.46
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.99
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 32.15
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 159.42
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 74.71
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.49
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.84
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 51.02
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.92
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.52
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.49
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 72.11
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 126.42
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 79.34
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 101.17
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 80.93
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 87.77
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 155.91
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.1 !
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.16
A~ - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.45
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 91.20
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.45
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.76
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 59.96
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,804.39
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTI~RN CALIFORNIA EDISON 50.54
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.02
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 75.34
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.75
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.64
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 70.04
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 39.11
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.02
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 59.93
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 70.37
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.02
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.95
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.75
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 41.35
User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: l0 Current Date: 08/11/20G
Report:CK_AGENDA PEG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:50:1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/27/2004 through 8/10/2004
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.38
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 201.37
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.54
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 63.15
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.33
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.33
AP- 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.33
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.03
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 59.12
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.33
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.07
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 101.66
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.46
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 157.44
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.06
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 583.54
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.76
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 77.33
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.33
AP - 00213203 7/28/20~4 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 504.03
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.92
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 29.43
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.77
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 35.63
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.21
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNiA EDISON 198.13
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.33
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.06
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 90.64
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 77.62
AP- 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CAL1FORNIAEDISON 152.87
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.95
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.76
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.06
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 85.71
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.68
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.33
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 27.03
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.33
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 116.35
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 104.43
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 76.93
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 33.26
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 180.28
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.83
User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 11 Current Date: 08/11/20C
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:50:1
II
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/27/2004 through 8/10/2004
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.92
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 120.00
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.11
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.21
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.06
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.03
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 103.40
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.90
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.73
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.06
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.21
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.18
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.06
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.33
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.26
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.14
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 29.07
AP - 00213203 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.33
AP - 00213204 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 506.14
AP - 00213204 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 6,244.62
AP - 00213204 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.83
AP - 00213204 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 5,888.15
AP - 00213204 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,624.56
AP - 00213204 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,379.01
AP - 00213205 7/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 628.41
AP - 00213206 7/28/2004 SOUTHWEST HEALTHCARE SYSTEM 280.00
AP - 00213207 7/28/2004 STEWART, DEBRA 40.00
AP - 00213208 7/28/2004 STOKLEY'S SERVICES iNC 8,230.12
AP- 00213208 7/28/2004 STOKLEY'S SERVICES [NC 6,237.83
AP - 00213208 7/28/2004 STOKLEY'S SERVICES [NC 708.00
AP - 00213209 7/28/2004 SWARTZ, DENISE 40.00
AP- 00213210 7/28/2004 T MOBILE 285.16
AP - 00213211 7/28/2004 TALOSIG, LILIAN 90.00
AP - 00213212 7/28/2004 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS 33.10
AP - 00213213 7/28/2004 TAYLOR, LINDA 40.00
AP - 00213215 7/28/2004 TIME WARNER TELECOM 2,560.90
AP- 00213216 7/28/2004 TOMARK SPORTS INC 134.68
AP - 00213216 7/28/2004 TOMARK SPORTS [NC 297.22
AP - 00213216 7/28/2004 TOMARK SPORTS 1NC 809.51
AP - 00213217 7/28/2004 TOTAL PLAN OF THE INLAND EMPIRE INC 1,933.04
AP - 00213217 7/28/2004 TOTAL PLAN OF THE INLAND EMPIRE INC 322.17
AP - 00213217 7/28/2004 TOTAL PLAN OF THE INLAND EMPIRE 1NC 322.18
AP - 00213217 7/28/2004 TOTAL PLAN OF THE INLAND EMPIRE INC 322.17
AP - 00213217 7/28/2004 TOTAL PLAN OF THE INLAND EMPIRE INC 2,942.65
AP- 00213218 7/28/2004 TREJO, ROBERT 34.00
AP- 00213219 7/28/2004 UPS 33.13
AP - 00213221 7/28/2004 VAUGI-1T, LEIGH ANN 40.00
AP - 00213222 7/28/2004 VERDICON iNC 1,207.34
AP - 00213223 7/28/2004 VERIZON INTERNET SOLUTIONS 32.45
AP - 00213224 7/28/2004 VERIZON 27.95
AP - 00213224 7/28/2004 VERIZON 20.42
User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 12 Current Date: 08/11/20C
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:50:1
12.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/27/2004 through 8/10/2004
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00213224 7/28/2004 VERIZON 27.95
AP - 00213224 7/28/2004 VERIZON 55.89
AP - 00213224 7/28/2004 VERIZON 55.89
AP - 00213226 7/28/2004 VITALE, KRISTI 40.00
AP - 00213226 7/28/2004 VITALE, KRISTI 165.00
AP - 00213228 7/28/2004 WALLACE, DWAINE 76.00
AP - 00213229 7/28/2004 WALTERS W]-IOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 210.71
AP- 00213230 7/28/2004 WEBB, ROBYN 80.00
AP - 00213231 7/28/2004 WECHSELBERGER, ADRIENNE 40.00
AP - 00213232 7/28/2004 WEEKS, SARAH 436.09
AP - 00213233 7/28/2004 WESTERN HIGHWAY PRODUCTS INC 2,147.46
AP - 00213234 7/28/2004 WHITE CAP CONST SUPPLY 470.46
AP- 00213235 7/28/2004 WICKUM, ROBERT 98.88
AP - 00213236 7/28/2004 WIGHTMAN, LAURA 78.80
AP - 00213237 7/28/2004 W1LKERSON, BRIDGET 46.00
AP- 00213238 7/28/2004 WlLLDAN ASSOCIATES 71,492.00
AP - 00213239 7/28/2004 WILLIAMS, ANDREA 65.00
AP - 00213240 7/28/2004 WRIGHT, BARBARA 185.00
AP - 00213241 7/28/2004 WVMVCD 10,946.35
AP- 00213242 7/28/2004 YNIQUEZ, TRACY 18.38
AP - 00213243 7/28/2004 ZINKOSKY, SHELLY 25.25
AP - 00213244 7/28/2004 ABBA, NATE 36.00
AP - 00213245 7/28/2004 ALLEN, SYLVESTER R 113.70
AP - 00213246 7/28/2004 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 25.00
AP - 00213247 7/28/2004 ALTA LOMA CHARTER LINES 430.08
AP - 00213248 7/28/2004 ARCHIBALD PET HOSPITAL 50.00
AP - 00213249 7/28/2004 ARELLANO, GABRIEL 30.00
AP - 00213250 7/28/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 73.89
AP - 00213250 7/28/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 156.40
AP - 00213250 7/28/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 480.00
AP - 00213251 7/28/2004 BERTS MEGA MALL 12,113.65
AP - 00213252 7/28/2004 BEVERIDGE, GEORGE 90.00
AP- 00213253 7/28/2004 BRODART BOOKS 3,530.82
AP - 00213254 7/28/2004 CAL PERS LONG TERM CARE 320.26
AP - 00213255 7/28/2004 CALIFORNIA MUNICIFAL UTILITY ASSOC 2,175.00
AP - 00213256 7/28/2004 CALIFORNIA PEACE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION 260.00
AP - 00213257 7/28/2004 CALTRANS DISTRICT 8 6,000.00
AP - 00213258 7/2812004 CARDENAS, SERGIO 20.00
AP - 00213259 7/28/2004 CHAFFEY COLLEGE 400.00
AP - 00213260 7/28/2004 CITRUS COLLEGE 600.00
AP - 00213261 7/28/2004 CITY RENTALS 47.26
AP - 00213261 7/28/2004 CITY RENTALS -20.00
AP - 00213262 7/28/2004 CORONA, LORENA 209.00
AP - 00213263 7/28/2004 COX, JACQUIE 22.50
AP - 00213264 7/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 665.00
AP- 00213265 7/28/2004 DAWSON & ASSOCIATES 1,391.63
AP - 00213266 7/28/2004 DENTAL HEALTH SERVICES 75.30
AP - 00213267 7/28/2004 DICK AND ASSOCIATES, RICHARD 322.50
AP - 00213268 7/28/2004 DIEVENDORF, CHRISTOPHER 261.25
AP- 00213269 7/28/2004 DORTA, GEORGE 51.61
AP - 00213270 7/28/2004 DOUGLASS, ROBYNN 495.00
AP - 00213272 7/28/2004 DUGAN, ALLISON 607.50
AP - 00213273 7/28/2004 ENGSTROM, DANIEL 1,000.00
User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 13 Current Date: 08/11/20¢
Report:CK_AGENDA_RE<PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: .~08:50:1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/27/2004 through 8/10/2004
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00213274 7/28/2004 EVANS, JOANNA 25.00
AP - 00213275 7/28/2004 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 11.13
AP - 00213276 7/28/2004 FEDERAL EXPRESS FREIGHT WEST INC. 58.00
AP - 00213277 7/28/2004 FIELDS, JUSTIN 90.00
AP- 00213278 7/28/2004 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 136.00
AP - 00213279 7/28/2004 GADABOUT TOURS INC 60.00
AP - 00213280 7/28/2004 GALE GROUP,THE 175.06
AP - 00213280 7/28/2004 GALE GROUP,THE 54.16
AP - 00213281 7/28/2004 GARCIA, VIVIAN 27.00
AP - 00213282 7/28/2004 GEIGER, VERNON 90.00
AP - 00213283 7/28/2004 GELDARD, CHARLOTTE 40.00
AP - 00213284 7/28/2004 GONZALES, CARLOS 40.00
AP ~ 00213285 7/28/2004 GOODMAN & ASSOCIATES 600.00
AP - 00213286 7/28/2004 GRAVES AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLY 35.73
AP - 00213287 7/28/2004 HAKIMI, SUSAN 204.66
AP - 00213288 7/28/2004 HANSON, BARRYE 10.00
AP - 00213289 7/28/2004 HILL, LAUREN 42.00
AP - 00213290 7/28/2004 HINRICHSEN, GREG 800.00
AP - 00213290 7/28/2004 HINRICHSEN, GREG 155.16
AP - 00213291 7/28/2004 H1RSCH AND ASSOCIATES 700.00
AP - 00213292 7/28/2004 HOYT LUMBER CO., SM 223.74
AP - 00213293 7/28/2004 JW'S AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY 300.00
AP - 00213294 7/28/2004 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC 67,807.22
AP - 00213294 7/28/2004 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC 2,123.26
AP - 00213295 7/28/2004 LAMB, RAMDAS 90.00
AP - 00213296 7/28/2004 LEFF, ROY A 90.00
AP - 00213297 7/28/2004 LIBRARY ADMINISTRATORS DIGEST 45.00
AP - 00213298 7/28/2004 LOBOS, JULIE 25.00
AP - 00213299 7/28/2004 LOPEZ, ROBERT 60.00
AP - 00213300 7/28/2004 MATAMOROS, LESLIE 675.00
AP - 00213302 7/28/2004 MIMIS CAFE 240.00
AP - 00213303 7/28/2004 MORIN, LAURA 80.00
AP - 00213304 7/28/2004 N M A DUES C/O NAOMI ROBERTS 8.31
AP - 00213306 7/28/2004 NATIONAL DEFERRED 27,469.60
AP - 00213307 7/28/2004 NIKPOUR, SHIRIN 60.00
AP - 00213308 7/28/2004 NJUGUNA, SAMMY 90.00
AP - 00213309 7/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 612.76
AP 00213309 7/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 31.33
AP 00213309 7/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 45.31
AP 00213309 7/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 64.85
AP 00213310 7/28/2004 OMNITRANS 646.00
AP 00213311 7/28/2004 OTT, LAURA 90.00
AP 00213311 7/28/2004 OTT, LAURA 333.00
AP 00213311 7/28/2004 OTT, LAURA 120.25
AP 00213312 7/28/2004 PACHECO, MARCO 90.00
AP 00213313 7/28/2004 PAPER DIRECT INC 5.00
AP 00213314 7/28/2004 PEREZ, HECTOR 70.00
AP- 00213316 7/28/2004 POMONA PRINT STOP 823.21
AP - 00213317 7/28/2004 POURHASSANIAN, ABBY 90.00
AP - 00213318 7/28/2004 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 156.63
AP- 00213319 7/28/2004 PRECINCT REPORTER 51.00
AP - 00213320 7/28/2004 PRINCIPAL LIFE 1,661.75
AP - 00213321 7/28/2004 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 7.00
User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 14 Current Date: 08/11/20~
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:, ,,08:50:1
/
q
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/27/2004 through 8/10/2004
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00213323 7/28/2004 RAMIREZ, DOLORES 34.00
AP - 00213324 7/28/2004 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 12.45
AP - 00213325 7/28/2004 REDINGER, TOM 90.00
AP - 00213326 7/28/2004 SAFECO LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 1,818.00
AP - 00213327 7/28/2004 SCHWARZER, ROY 90.00
AP - 00213328 7/28/2004 SENCHAL, CAL 175.00
AP- 00213328 7/28/2004 SENCHAL, CAL 71.00
AP- 00213328 7/28/2004 SENCHAL, CAL 73.50
AP- 00213329 7/28/2004 SIGN SHOP, THE 592.63
AP- 00213329 7/28/2004 SIGN SHOP, THE 75.43
AP - 00213330 7/28/2004 SMART AND FINAL 85.68
AP- 00213330 7/28/2004 SMART AND FINAL 71.19
AP - 00213330 7/28/2004 SMART AND FINAL 196.10
AP - 00213331 7/28/2004 SMITH, JULIANNE 40.00
AP- 00213332 7/28/2004 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 910.77
AP - 00213333 7/28/2004 SOUTHLAND SPORTS OFFICIALS 332.00
AP - 00213335 7/28/2004 LIMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION 200.00
AP- 00213335 7/28/2004 UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION 2,553.00
AP- 00213337 7/28/2004 US POSTMASTER 7,500.00
AP - 00213339 7/28/2004 VARGO, KAREN 400.00
AP - 00213340 7/28/2004 VENTURA, MIKE 36.00
AP - 00213340 7/28/2004 VENTURA, MIKE 4.00
AP - 00213341 7/28/2004 VIGILANCE, TERRENCE 357.00
AP - 00213342 7/28/2004 VOGEL, ROCHELLE 30.00
AP - 00213343 7/28/2004 VU, LUONG DINH 147.25
AP - 00213345 7/28/2004 WALKER, KENNETH A 90.00
AP - 00213346 7/28/2004 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 36.51
AP - 00213347 7/28/2004 WHITE, LARRY 90.00
AP - 00213348 7/28/2004 XEROX CORPORATION 929.35
AP - 00213349 7/28/2004 YEE, LARRY 95.00
AP 00213350 8/4/2004 ACCELA 6,523.18
AP 00213351 8/4/2004 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 125.00
AP 00213352 8/4/2004 ARCH]TERRA DESIGN GROUP 2,534.56
AP 00213353 8/4/2004 ASSI SECURITY 967.00
AP 00213353 8/4/2004 ASSI SECURITY 370.50
AP 00213354 8/4/2004 ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS 19,641.00
AP 00213356 8/4/2004 CAMPBELL-COOK, GENA 140.00
AP 00213357 8/4/2004 CHAVEZ, OLIVIA 80.00
AP 00213358 8/4/2004 CI-~, ANH 90.00
AP 00213359 8/4/2004 CITY NATIONAL BANK 71,233.47
AP - 00213359 8/4/2004 CITY NATIONAL BANK 89,520.19
AP - 00213361 8/4/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 75.08
AP - 00213361 8/4/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,570.78
AP - 00213361 8/4/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,922.58
AP - 00213361 8/4/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 3,572.58
AP - 00213361 8/4/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.60
AP ~ 00213361 8/4/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 200.17
AP - 00213361 8/4/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 602.48
AP - 00213361 8/4/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 3,827.13
AP - 00213361 8/4/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 55.20
AP - 00213361 8/4/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2,230.88
AP - 00213361 8/4/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 412.77
AP - 00213361 8/4/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 152.83
User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 15 Current Date: 08/11/20C
Report:CK_AGENDA PEG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: ~8:50:1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/27/2004 through 8/10/2004
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00213361 8/4/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 809.48
AP - 00213361 8/4/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 30.53
AP - 00213361 8/4/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 139.03
AP - 00213361 8/4/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 758.88
AP - 00213361 8/4/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 127.64
AP - 00213361 8/4/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 186.63
AP - 00213361 8/4/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 64.73
AP - 00213361 8/4/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 105.68
AP - 00213361 8/4/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 657.78
AP - 00213361 8/4/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 210.43
AP - 00213361 8/4/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.60
AP - 00213361 8/4/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 542.78
AP - 00213361 8/4/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 605.93
AP - 00213361 8/4/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 130.28
AP - 00213361 8/4/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 186.18
AP - 00213361 8/4/2004- CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 287.38
AP - 00213361 8/4/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 109.13
AP - 00213361 8/4/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 148.23
AP - 00213361 8/4/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2,148.51
AP - 00213361 8/4/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 128.17
AP - 00213361 8/4/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.60
AP - 00213361 8/4/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.60
AP - 00213361 8/4/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,594.93
AP - 00213361 8/4/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 887.33
AP - 00213361 8/4/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 887.33
AP - 00213361 8/4/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 668.03
AP - 00213361 8/4/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 787.63
AP - 00213361 8/4/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,467.28
AP - 00213361 8/4/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 192.38
AP - 00213361 8/4/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 119.93
AP - 00213361 8/4/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 162.13
AP - 00213362 8/4/2004 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 748.87
AP - 00213362 8/4/2004 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 1,277.92
AP - 00213362 8/4/2004 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 2,235.78
AP - 00213362 8/4/2004 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 298.47
AP - 00213362 8/4/2004 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 642.19
AP - 00213363 8/4/2004 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 7,700.00
AP - 00213363 8/4/2004 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 16,990.00
AP - 00213364 8/4/2004 DILLON, BERNIE 66.00
AP - 00213365 8/4/2004 ECS IMAGING INC 16,690.96
AP - 00213366 8/4/2004 EFFYCHIOU, AUDREY 375.00
AP - 00213367 8/4/2004 EMBASSY SUITES HOTEL - SAN DIEGO BAY 939.56
AP - 00213368 8/4/2004 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 14.97
AP - 00213368 8/4/2004 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 14.97
AP - 00213368 8/4/2004 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 14.97
AP - 00213368 8/4/2004 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 17.35
AP - 00213368 8/4/2004 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 13.02
AP - 00213368 8/4/2004 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 14.97
AP - 00213369 8/4/2004 FERNANDEZ, INES 49.00
AP - 00213370 8/4/2004 FIELDMAN ROLAPP AND ASSOCIATES 3,918.20
AP - 00213370 8/4/2004 FIELDMAN ROLAPP AND ASSOCIATES 6,870.23
AP - 00213371 8/4/2004 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 110.23
AP - 00213371 8/4/2004 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 86.71
User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 16 Current Date: 08/11/20C
Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:.t 08:50:1
~It,
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/27/2004 through 8/10/2004
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00213371 8/4/2004 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 130.85
AP - 00213372 8/4/2004 GUSTAFSON, RICHARD 17.00
AP - 00213374 8~4~2004 HINRICHSEN, BARBARA 95.00
AP - 00213375 8/4/2004 ICMA 228.00
AP - 00213375 8/4/2004 ICMA 228.00
AP - 00213378 8/4/2004 ISHERWOOD, LINDA 14.00
AP - 00213379 8/4/2004 KEITH COMPANIES, THE 2,291.52
AP - 00213380 8/4/2004 KIRCHNER, JACLYN 40.00
AP - 00213381 8/4/2004 KOTZIN AND ASSOCIATES, R 5,324.80
AP - 00213383 8/4/2004 LANDRETH, PAMELA 80.00
AP - 00213384 8/4/2004 LANSANG, CHRISTINE 40.00
AP - 00213386. 8/4/2004 LEE, JIYOUN 40.00
AP - 00213388 8/4/2004 M & M BOYS SUPPLY 97.50
AP 00213388 8/4/2004 M &M BOYS SUPPLY 160.78
AP 00213388 8/4/2004 M & M BOYS SUPPLY 199.06
AP 00213388 8/4/2004 M & M BOYS SUPPLY 852.47
AP 00213388 8/4/2004 M & M BOYS SUPPLY 210.26
AP 00213389 8/4/2004 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 497.46
AP 00213389 8/4/2004 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 2,845.19
AP 00213389 8/4/2004 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 737.24
AP - 00213389 8/4/2004 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 63.40
AP - 00213389 8/4/2004 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 4,282.99
AP - 00213389 8/4/2004 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT 1NC 2,000.00
AP - 00213389 8/4/2004 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 395.72
AP - 00213389 8/4/2004 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 2,559.06
AP - 00213389 8/4/2004 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 7,320.86
AP - 00213389 8/4/2004 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 1,141.79
AP - 00213389 8/4/2004 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 497.46
AP - 00213389 8/4/2004 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 2,559.06
AP - 00213389 8/4/2004 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 766.42
AP - 00213389 8/4/2004 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 737.24
AP - 00213389 8/4/2004 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 4,282.99
AP - 00213389 8/4/2004 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 4,845.19
AP - 00213389 8/4/2004 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 10,718.70
AP - 00213389 8/4/2004 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 1,63 i. 13
AP - 00213389 8/4/2004 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 4,944.45
AP - 00213390 8/4/2004 MARTINEZ, ANA 200.00
AP - 00213391 8/4/2004 MICROAGE COMPUTERMART 4,998.52
AP - 00213392 8/4/2004 MOURAD, ESTELA 80.00
AP - 00213393 8/4/2004 NATIVIDAD, ELIZABETH 80.00
AP - 00213394 8/4/2004 NEC BUSINESS NETWORK SOLUTIONS INC 550.00
AP - 00213395 8/4/2004 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS 95.81
AP - 00213395 8/4/2004 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS 46.28
AP - 00213395 8/4/2004 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS 52.28
AP - 00213395 8/4/2004 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS 46.28
AP - 00213396 8/4/2004 O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC 45.04
AP - 00213396 8/4/2004 O C B REPROGRAPHiCS INC 209.20
AP - 00213396 8/4/2004 O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC 176.71
AP - 00213396 8/4/2004 O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC 32.86
AP - 00213396 8/4/2004 O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC 32.86
AP - 00213396 8/4/2004 O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC 110.29
AP - 00213396 8/4/2004 O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC 460.12
AP - 00213396 8/4/2004 O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC 39.52
User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 17 Current Date: 08/11/20C
Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_Re - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:l7-08:50:1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/27/2004 through 8/10/2004
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00213396 8/4/2004 O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC 232.96
AP - 00213396 8/4/2004 O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC 291.73
AP - 00213396 8/4/2004 O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC 32.86
AP - 00213396 8/4/2004 O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC 37.67
AP - 00213396 8/4/2004 O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC 396.10
AP - 00213396 8/4/2004 O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC 148.99
AP - 00213396 8/4/2004 O C B REPROGRAPHICS [NC 291.73
AP - 00213397 8/4/2004 OCtIOA, JESSE 40.00
AP - 00213398 8/4/2004 OCLC [NC 52.40
AP - 00213399 8/4/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 199.37
AP - 00213399 8/4/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 237.05
AP - 00213399 8/4/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 324.17
AP - 00213399 8/4/2004 OFFICE DEPOT -20.15
AP - 00213399 8/4/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 20.14
AP - 00213399 8/4/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 4.09
AP - 00213399 8/4/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 93.44
AP 00213400 8/4/2004 ORACLE CORP 12,396.10
AP 00213401 8/4/2004 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 825.00
AP 00213403 8/4/2004 OWEN ELECTRIC 16.60
AP 00213405 8/4/2004 PARRES, REBECCA 80.00
AP 00213406 8/4/2004 PASCUAL, CARMEN 200.00
AP 00213407 8/4/2004 PENTE, CHRISTINE 80.00
AP 00213408 8/4/2004 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 42.00
AP - 00213408 8/4/2004 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 343.01
AP - 00213408 8/4/2004 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 209.88
AP - 00213408 8/4/2004 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 193.84
AP - 00213408 8/4/2004 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 520.63
AP - 00213408 8/4/2004 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 27.00
AP - 00213409 8/4/2004 PEZO, JANET 76.00
AP - 00213410 8/4/2004 P1NCOTT, CARRIE 90.00
AP - 00213412 8/4/2004 PRABHU, SUNIL 40.00
AP - 00213413 8/4/2004 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION INC 168.75
AP - 00213414 8/4/2004 PRESTON, ERIKA 40.00
AP - 00213416 8/4/2004 RAND, TERESA 140.00
AP - 00213417 8/4/2004 REINOSO, MARTHA 40.00
AP - 00213418 8/4/2004 RETANA, LAURA 40.00
AP - 00213419 8/4/2004 REVELO, CLAUDIA 200.00
AP - 00213420 8/4/2004 RMA GROUP 4,161.03
AP - 00213421 8/4/2004 ROBERTS, LORI 40.00
AP - 00213422 8/4/2004 ROWLAND, FRANCIS 40.00
AP - 00213424 8/4/2004 SAFEWAY SIGN COMPANY 1,103.96
AP - 00213425 8/4/2004 SAN BERNARD[NO COUNTY 41,052.19
AP - 00213425 8/4/2004 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 35,937.01
AP - 00213426 8/4/2004 SAN DIEGO MARRIOTT HOTEL AND MARINA 258.12
AP - 00213426 8/4/2004 SAN DIEGO MARRIOTT HOTEL AND MARINA 242.12
AP - 00213427 8/4/2004 SCHULTZ, WALLY 119.00
AP - 00213428 8/4/2004 SINGLETON, CARMON 27.00
AP - 00213429 8/4/2004 SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES 1,500.00
AP - 00213429 8/4/2004 SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES 1,500.00
AP - 00213431 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALII~ORNIA EDISON 12.90
AP- 00213431 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 271.98
AP - 00213431 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 115.64
AP - 00213431 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALIEORNIA EDISON 14.19
User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 18 Current Date: 08/11/20C
Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: ~,08:50:1
/
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/27/2004 through 8/10/2004
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00213431 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDIS ON 14.19
AP- 0021343I 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90
AP - 00213431 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALiFORNIA EDISON 14.19
AP - 00213431 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALiFORNIA EDISON 14.81
AP - 00213431 81412004 SOUTHERN CALiFORNIA EDISON 79.92
AP - 00213431 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90
AP - 00213431 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.83
AP - 00213431 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALiFORNIA EDISON 1.30
AP - 00213431 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALiFORNIA EDISON 13.76
AP - 00213431 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALiFORNIA EDISON 23.33
AP - 00213431 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALiFORNIA EDISON 43.12
AP - 00213431 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 89.47
AP- 00213431 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.29
AP - 00213431 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALiFORNIA EDISON 25.13
AP - 00213431 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALiFORNIA EDISON 11.98
AP - 00213431 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALiFORNIA EDISON 14.54
AP - 00213431 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALiFORNIA EDISON 81.77
AP - 00213431 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALiFORNIA EDISON 13.76
AP - 00213431 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALiFORNIA EDISON 14.69
AP - 00213431 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.37
AP - 00213431 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALiFORNIA EDISON 111.22
AP - 00213431 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.21
AP - 00213431 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.68
AP - 00213431 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALiFORNIA EDISON 15.28
AP - 00213431 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.19
AP - 00213431 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.23
AP - 00213431 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.19
AP- 00213431 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.19
AP - 00213431 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 131.04
AP- 00213431 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 91.93
AP- 00213431 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.53
AP - 00213431 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALiFORNIA EDISON 147.23
AP - 00213431 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALiFORNIA EDISON 123.29
AP - 00213431 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALiFORNIA EDISON 14.23
AP - 00213431 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALiFORNIA EDISON 13.76
AP - 00213431 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.07
AP - 00213431 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON , 72.81
AP - 00213431 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALiFORNIA EDISON 13.06
AP - 00213431 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALiFORNIA EDISON 16.05
AP - 00213431 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALiFORNIA EDISON 181.63
AP - 00213431 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALiFORNIA EDISON 238.34
AP - 00213431 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALiFORNIA EDISON 101.05
AP - 00213431 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALiFORNIA EDISON 105.40
AP - 00213431 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 39.48
AP - 00213431 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALiFORNIA EDISON 201.47
AP - 00213431 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.52
AP - 00213432 8/4/2004 STEINY AND COMPANY INC 7,695.00
AP - 00213432 8/4/2004 STE1NY AND COMPANY ][NC -769.50
AP - 00213432 8/4/2004 STEINY AND COMPANY INC 206,428.13
AP - 00213432 8/4/2004 STEINY AND COMPANY INC 17,488.90
AP - 00213432 8/4/2004 STE1NY AND COMPANY INC 17,488.90
AP - 00213432 8/4/2004 STEINY AND COMPANY INC -15,591.15
AP - 00213432 8/4/2004 STEINY AND COMPANY INC -1,748.89
User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 19 Current Date: 08/11/20C
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:, ~n,08:50:1
/
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/27/2004 through 8/10/2004
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00213432 8/4/2004 STEINY AND COMPANY INC -1,748.89
AP - 00213432 8/4/2004 STEINY AND COMPANY INC 77,219.60
AP - 00213432 8/4/2004 STEINY AND COMPANY INC -7,721.96
AP - 00213433 8/4/2004 STEVENS, CHRISTINA 20.00
AP - 00213434 8/4/2004 SULLY-MILLER CONTRACTING COMPANY 895,201.93
AP - 00213434 8/4/2004 SULLY-MILLER CONTRACTING COMPANY -89,520.19
AP - 00213434 81412004 SULLY-MILLER CONTRACTING COMPANY 712,334.68
AP - 00213434 8/4/2004 SULLY-MILLER CONTRACTING COMPANY -71,233.47
AP - 00213435 8/4/2004 TELLKAMP, SUZIE 40.00
AP - 00213436 8/4/2004 TRUDO, TERRANCE 40.00
AP - 00213437 8/4/2004 TURCH AND ASSOCIATES, DAVID 4,000.00
AP - 00213438 8/4/2004 UNION ENGINEERING COMPANY INC 60,143.13
AP - 00213438 8/4/2004 UNION ENGINEERING COMPANY INC -8,982.90
AP - 00213439 8/4/2004 UNIQUE MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC 367.29
AP - 00213440 8/4/2004 VAZQUEZ, JUAN ANTONIO 160.00
AP - 00213442 8/4/2004 VERIZON 42.54
AP - 00213442 8/4/2004 VERIZON 87.20
AP - 00213442 8/4/2004 VERIZON 65.12
AP - 00213442 8/4/2004 VERIZON 129.90
AP - 00213442 8/4/2004 VERIZON 47.06
AP - 00213442 8/4/2004 VERIZON 48.54
AP - 00213442 8/4/2004 VERIZON 464.25
AP - 00213442 8/4/2004 VERIZON 570.62
AP - 00213442 8/4/2004 VERIZON 205.43
AP - 00213442 8/4/2004 VERIZON 77.46
AP - 00213442 8/4/2004 VERIZON 82.74
AP - 00213442 8/4/2004 VERIZON 91.23
AP - 00213442 8/4/2004 VERIZON 91.21
AP - 00213442 8/4/2004 VERIZON 28.92
AP - 00213442 8/4/2004 VERIZON 27.95
AP - 00213442 8/4/2004 VERIZON 88.15
AP - 00213442 8/4/2004 VERIZON 43.76
AP - 00213442 8/4/2004 VERIZON 51.94
AP - 00213442 8/4/2004 VERIZON 47.23
AP - 00213442 8/4/2004 VERiZON 55.28
AP - 00213442 8/4/2004 VERIZON 55.89
AP - 00213442 8/4/2004 VERIZON 28.35
AP - 00213442 8/4/2004 VERIZON 401.00
AP - 00213442 8/4/2004 VERIZON 18.34
AP - 00213442 8/4/2004 VERIZON 29.39
AP - 00213442 8/4/2004 VERIZON 154.93
AP - 00213442 8/4/2004 VERIZON 28.39
AP - 00213442 8/4/2004 VERIZON 91.23
AP - 00213442 8/4/2004 VERIZON 89.77
AP - 00213442 8/4/2004 VERIZON 28.92
AP - 00213442 8/4/2004 VERIZON 29.50
AP - 00213442 8/4/2004 VERIZON 139.14
AP - 00213442 8/4/2004 VERIZON 50.48
AP - 00213442 8/4/2004 VERIZON 495.98
AP - 00213442 8/4/2004 VERIZON 111.79
AP - 00213442 · 8/4/2004 VERIZON 27.95
AP - 00213442 8/4/2004 VERIZON 38.38
AP - 00213442 8/4/2004 VERJZON 38.38
User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 20 Current Date: 08/11/20t2
Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time' .~ ~08:50:I
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/27/2004 through 8/10/2004
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00213442 8/4/2004 VERIZON 29.52
AP - 00213442 8/4/2004 VERIZON 91.23
AP - 00213442 8/4/2004 VERIZON 89.77
AP - 00213442 8/4/2004 VERIZON 89.77
AP - 00213442 8/4/2004 VERIZON 30.15
AP - 00213442 8/4/2004 VERIZON 28.87
AP - 00213442 8/4/2004 VERIZON 27.95
AP - 00213443 8/4/2004 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 1,224.44
AP - 00213443 8/4/2004 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 10.00
AP - 00213443 8/4/2004 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 629.01
AP - 00213443 8/4/2004 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 13.31
AP - 00213443 8/4/2004 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 151.98
AP - 00213443 8/4/2004 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 30.92
AP - 00213444 8/4/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 127.38
AP - 00213444 8/4/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 37.84
AP - 00213444 8/4/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 112.86
AP - 00213444 8/4/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 25.96
AP - 00213444 8/4/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 143.88
AP - 00213444 8/4/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 120.56
AP - 00213444 8/4/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 31.68
AP - 00213444 8/4/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 54.12
AP - 00213444 8/4/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 87.56
AP - 00213445 8/4/2004 WESTERN LAWN EQUIPMENT COMPANY INC 308.28
AP - 00213446 8/4/2004 WHITTIER FERTILIZER 378.00
AP - 00213446 8/4/2004 WHITTIER FERTILIZER 53.00
AP - 00213447 8/4/2004 WSA US GUARDS CO INC 1,682.03
AP - 00213447 8/4/2004 WSA US GUARDS CO INC 2,748.50
AP - 00213447 8/4/2004 WSA US GUARDS CO INC 5,646.50
AP - 00213447 8/4/2004 WSA US GUARDS CO INC 5,721.30
AP - 00213447 8/4/2004 WSA US GUARDS CO INC 2,294.25
AP - 00213447 8/4/2004 WSA US GUARDS CO INC 448.50
AP - 00213447 8/4/2004 WSA US GUARDS CO INC 2,883.64
AP - 00213447 8/4/2004 WSA US GUARDS CO INC 2,208.00
AP - 00213447 8/4/201M WSA US GUARDS CO INC 5,511.41
AP - 00213447 8/4/2004 WSA LIS GUARDS CO INC 1,647.52
AP - 00213447 8/4/2004 WSA US GUARDS CO INC 3,474.54
AP - 00213447 8/4/2004 WSA US GUARDS CO INC 2,718.24
AP - 00213448 8/4/2004 XEROX CORPORATION 10,594.45
AP - 00213448 8/4/2004 XEROX CORPORATION 33.92
AP - 00213448 8/4/2004 XEROX CORPORATION 33.92
AP - 00213448 8/4/2004 XEROX CORPORATION 150.53
AP - 00213448 8/4/2004 XEROX CORPORATION ' 150.53
AP - 00213448 8/4/2004 XEROX CORPORATION 929.35
AP - 00213449 8/4/2004 ZUNIGA, VALERIE 28.00
AP - 00213450 8/4/2004 ABLAC 16.39
AP - 00213452 8/4/2004 ALLIANCE BUS LINES INC 539.85
AP - 00213453 8/4/2004 ALTA FIRE EQUIPMENT CO 27.78
AP - 00213454 8/4/2004 ALTA LOMA CHARTER LINES 469.17
AP - 00213455 8/4/2004 ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF FOOTHILL COMMUN] 1,200.00
AP - 00213456 8/4/2004 BALNEG, RAFAEL 400.00
AP - 00213459 8/4/2004 BILL BLANCHARDS LITTLE BIG BAND 250.00
AP - 00213459 8/4/2004 BILL BLANCHARDS LITTLE BIG BAND 250.00
AP - 00213460 8/4/2004 BMJ WORK GROUP INC 150.00
User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 21 Current Date: 08/11/20¢
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:50:1
21
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/2712004 through 8/10/2004
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00213461 8/4/2004 BOCTOR, ALFRED 60.00
AP - 00213462 8/4/2004 BOLTON, CYNTHIA 50.00
AP - 00213463 8/4/2004 BOPKO, CHRISTOPHER 200.00
AP - 00213464 8/4/2004 BRUCE, INGRID 250.00
AP - 00213464 8/4/2004 BRUCE, INGRID 250.00
AP - 00213465 8/4/2004 CAL PERS LONG TERM CARE 315.92
AP - 00213466 8/4/2004 CALAA I00.00
AP - 00213467 8/4/2004 CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATIO~ 1,019.00
AP - 00213468 8/4/2004 CASTELLS, GEORGE 66.85
AP - 00213470 8/4/2004 CHANCA, FERNANDO 60.00
AP 00213472 8/4/2004 CLABBY, SANDRA 1,000.00
AP 00213473 8/4/2004 CLARK, DEBORAH 10.00
AP 00213474 8/4/2004 CLOUT 20.00
AP 00213476 8/4/2004 DAVIES INC, ALBERT 107,085.69
AP 00213478 8/4/2004 DELEISE, JENAE 519.24
AP 00213479 8/4/2004 DELLHIME, SIGMUND 922.10
AP 00213479 8/4/2004 DELLHIME, SIGMUND 51.65
AP - 00213480 8/4/2004 DELTA DENTAL 31,982.36
AP - 00213481 8/4/2004 DEMPSTER, KERI 240.00
AP - 00213482 8/4/2004 DOUGLASS, ROBYNN 495.00
AP - 00213485 8/4/2004 ET1WANDA GARDENS 4,270.00
AP - 00213486 8/4/2004 ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT 385.00
AP - 00213487 8/4/2004 EXCLUSIVE EMAGES 77.58
AP - 00213487 8/4/2004 EXCLUSIVE EMAGES 126.06
AP - 00213488 8/4/2004 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 17.02
AP - 00213488 8/4/2004 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 16.08
AP - 00213488 8/4/2004 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 15.77
AP - 00213488 8/4/2004 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 18.60
AP - 00213488 8/4/2004 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 18.14
AP - 00213489 8/4/2004 FIRST PLACE TROPHIES 993.99
AP - 00213489 8/4/2004 FIRST PLACE TROPHIES 95.36
AP - 00213491 8/4/2004 GADABOfJT TOURS INC 646.00
AP - 00213491 8/4/2004 GADABOUT TOURS INC 200.00
AP ~ 00213492 8/4/2004 GALLS INC. 509.85
AP - 00213493 8/4/2004 GALLS INC 227.24
AP - 00213494 8/4/2004 GONZALES, CARLOS 110.00
AP - 00213496 8/4/2004 GTSI CORP 1,708.24
AP - 00213497 8/4/2004 GUARDIAN 2,532.65
AP - 00213498 8/4/2004 HAAS DICTATING SYSTEMS 495.54
AP - 00213498 8/4/2004 HAAS DICTATING SYSTEMS 149.85
AP - 00213501 8/4/2004 IBM CORPORATION 849.66
AP - 00213502 8/4/2004 INSIGHT PUBLIC SECTOR 2,583.73
AP - 00213503 8/4/2004 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL 111.51
AP - 00213505 8/4/2004 IRON MOUNTAIN OSDP 366.50
AP - 00213506 8/4/2004 JOHNSON, CHEARICE 250.00
AP - 00213507 8/4/2004 KENDRENA, DONNA 47.46
AP - 00213508 8/4/2004 KONG, SOPHEAK 250.00
AP - 00213509 8/4/2004 KORANDA CONSTRUCTION 6,736.50
AP - 00213511 8/4/2004 LARSON, KELLEY 64.43
AP - 00213512 8/4/2004 LETS STOR IT 58.00
AP ~ 00213513 8/4/2004 LIL STITCH 309.78
AP - 00213514 8/4/2004 LOPEZ, ROBERT 60.00
AP - 00213515 8/4/2004 LOS ANGELES TIMES 42.00
User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 22 Current Date: 08/11/20C
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:50:1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/27/2004 through 8/10/2004
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00213516 8/4/2004 LOS ANGELES TIMES 42.00
AP - 00213519 8/4/2004 MARRIOTT HOTEL AND MARINA 1,155.40
AP - 00213519 8/4/2004 MARRIOTT HOTEL AND MARINA 48.00
AP - 00213519 8/4/2004 MARRIOTT HOTEL AND MARINA 96.00
AP - 00213519 8/4/2004 MARRIOTT HOTEL AND MARINA 160.00
AP - 00213520 8/4/2004 MARRIOTT HOTEL AND MARiNA 80.00
AP - 00213521 8/4/2004 MARRIOTT HOTEL AND MARINA 1,374.19
AP - 00213522 8/4/2004 MARRIOTT HOTEL AND MARINA 693.24
AP - 00213523 8/4/2004 MARRIOTT HOTEL AND MARINA 693.24
AP - 00213524 8/4/2004 MMASC 66.00
AP - 00213525 8/4/2004 NATIONAL DEFERRED 11,084.93
AP - 00213526 8/4/2004 NIKPOUR, MOHAMMED 60.00
AP - 00213527 8/4/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 49.73
AP - 00213527 8/4/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 5.86
AP - 00213527 8/4/2004 OE?'ICE DEPOT -119.21
AP - 00213527 8/4/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 22.01
AP - 00213527 8/4/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 155.60
AP - 00213527 8/4/2004 OI~YICE DEPOT 6.38
AP - 00213527 8/4/2004 OFFICE DEPOT -14.46
AP - 00213527 8/4/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 133.08
AP - 00213527 8/4/2004 OFFICE DEPOT -21.38
AP - 00213527 8/4/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 8.81
AP - 00213527 8/4/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 139.88
AP - 00213527 8/4/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 119.21
AP - 00213527 8/4/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 138.16
AP - 00213528 8/4/2004 ONTARIO, CITY OF 94,116.00
AP - 00213530 8/4/2004 PARSAC 81,462.00
AP - 00213532 8/4/2004 PORAC 240.00
AP - 00213533 8/4/2004 POURHASSANIAN, ABBY 30.00
AP - 00213534 8/4/2004 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 6.81
AP - 00213535 8/4/2004 PRINCIPAL LIEE 16,027.17
AP - 00213536 8/4/2004 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 270.29
AP - 00213537 8/4/2004 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 60.00
AP - 00213537 8/4/2004 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 30.00
AP - 00213538 8/4/2004 RANCHO CUCAMONGA QUAKES PROFESSIONA 10,000.00
AP - 00213539 8/4/2004 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 28.28
AP - 00213540 8/4/2004 RCPFA 6,133.81
AP - 00213541 8/4/20tM RDO EQUIPMENT COMPANY 274.81
AP - 00213541 8/4/2004 RDO EQUIPMENT COMPANY 518.54
AP - 00213542 8/4/2004 REGAN, JO CAROL 18.57
AP - 00213543 8/4/2004 REINHARDT, RITA 48.00
AP-00213543 8/4/2004 REINHARDT, RITA 312.00
AP - 00213544 8/4/2004 REMINGTON ARMS CO INC 58.66
AP - 00213545 8/4/2004 JONES, RENO 900.00
AP - 00213546 8/4/2004 RWB PARTY PROPS INC 3,232.50
AP - 00213547 8/4/2004 SALERNO, LIANNE 19.00
AP - 00213548 8/4/2004 SAMATER, SAM 120.00
AP - 00213549 8/4/2004 SAN BERNARDINO CO FIRE DEPT 28,525.50
AP - 00213551 8/4/2004 SANCHEZ, YVONNE 40.00
AP - 00213552 8/4/2004 SCOTT, DAVID 30.00
AP - 00213553 8/4/2004 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 75.00
AP - 00213554 8/4/2004 SIERRA SPRINGS 135.00
AP - 00213555 8/4/2004 SIR SPEEDY 118.65
User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 23 Current Date: 08/11/20C
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:50:1
23
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/27/2004 through 8/10/2004
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00213556 8/4/2004 SLJ PRO AUDIO SERVICES 330.00
AP - 00213556 8/4/2004 SLJ PRO AUDIO SERVICES 870.00
AP - 00213557 8/4/2004 SMART AND FINAL 14.85
AP - 00213557 8/4/2004 SMART AND FINAL 307.23
AP - 00213557 8/4/2004 SMART AND FINAL 391.11
AP - 00213557 8/4/2004 SMART AND FINAL 27.34
AP - 00213559 8/4/2004 SONSATIONAL ACTIVITIES 5,000.00
AP - 00213560 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.93
AP - 00213560 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 118.46
AP - 00213560 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 88.69
AP - 00213560 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.54
AP - 00213560 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 448.88
AP - 00213560 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 106.83
AP - 00213560 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.89
AP - 00213560 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.21
AP - 00213560 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 56.36
AP - 00213560 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 66.12
AP - 00213560 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.75
AP - 00213560 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.76
AP- 00213560 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.19
AP - 00213560 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90
AP - 00213560 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 122.46
AP - 00213560 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.37
AP ~ 00213560 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 86.59
AP - 00213560 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 49.73
AP - 00213560 8/4/2004 SOUTI-IERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 173.57
AP - 00213560 81412004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 116.65
AP - 00213560 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 43.95
AP - 00213560 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.37
AP - 00213560 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 138.91
AP - 00213560 81412004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 92.80
AP - 00213560 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.76
AP - 00213560 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 42.12
AP - 00213560 8/4/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 128.27
AP - 00213561 8/4/2004 SPEEDWAY MUIq~LER INC 587.59
AP - 00213562 8/4/2004 STACHOWIAK, MIKE AND WENDY 10.00
AP - 00213563 8/4/2004 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY 269.86
AP - 00213564 8/4/2004 STERLING COIq~EE SERVICE 254.58
AP - 00213565 8/4/2004 STEVES TOWING AND TRANSPORT 138.00
AP - 00213568 8/4/2004 UNITED WAY 49.00
AP - 00213571 8/4/2004 VERIZON 29.04
AP - 00213572 8/4/2004 VIGILANCE, TERRENCE 400.00
AP - 00213573 8/4/2004 VISION SERVICE PLAN CA 7,512.12
AP - 00213574 8/4/2004 WALKER, JANET 499.00
AP - 00213574 8/4/2004 WALKER, JANET 49.55
AP - 00213574 8/4/2004 WALKER, JANET 4.31
AP - 00213576 8/4/2004 WILSON AND BELL 60.82
AP - 00213576 8/4/2004 WILSON AND BELL 915.08
AP - 00213578 8/4/2004 YEE, LARRY 35.00
AP - 00213580 8/4/2004 MARRIOTT HOTEL AND MARINA 1,155.40
AP - 00213580 8/4/2004 MARRIOTT HOTEL AND MARINA 80.00
AP - 00213581 8/4/2004 MARRIOTT HOTEL AND MARLNA 1,374.19
AP - 00213581 8/4/2004 MARRIOTT HOTEL AND MARINA 160.00
User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 24 Current Date: 08/11/20C
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:50:1
.2'-/
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
A~enda Check Register
7/27/2004 through 8/10/2004
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP q 00213582 8/4/2004 MARRIOTT HOTEL AND MARINA 693.24
AP - 00213582 8/4/2004 MARRIOTT HOTEL AND MARINA 48.00
AP - 00213583 8/4/2004 MARRIOTT HOTEL AND MARINA 693.24
AP 2 00213583 8/4/2004 MARRIOTT HOTEL AND MARINA 96.00
Total for Check ID AP: 4,625,232.66
Total for Entity: 4,625,232.66
User: AtIAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 25 Current Date: 08/11/20C
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:50:1
City of Rancho Cucamonga
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
July 31,2004
Par Market Book % of Days to YTM YTM
Investments Value Value Value Po~'ffolio Term Maturity 360 Equiv. 365 Equiv.
Local Agency Investment Funds 23,730,050.22 23,730,050.22 23,730,050.22 13.30 1 1 1.582 1.604
Certificates of Deposit/Neg. - Bank 1,515,0~0.00 1,509,721 59 1,515,000.00 0.85 733 393 2.150 2.180
Federal Agency Issues - Coupon 148,250,000.00 146,501,019.84 148,171,856.25 83,05 1,481 1,223 3.236 3.281
Treasury Securities - Coupon 5,000,000.00 5,015,62500 4,985,546.88 2.79 1,070 1,017 3.184 3.229
Investments 178,495,050.22 176,756,416.65 178,402,453.35 100.00% 1,266 1,048 3.005 3.047
Cash and Accrued Interest
Passbook/Checking 983,929.88 983,929.88 983,829.88 I 1 0.493 0~500
(not included in yield calculations)
Accrued Interest at Purchase 11,377.03 11,377.03
Subtotal 995,306.91 995,306~91
Total Cash and Investments
179,478,980.10 177,751,723.56 179,397,760.26 1,266 1,048 3.005 3.047
Total Earnings July 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year TO Date
Current Year 451,914.99 451,914.99
Average Dally Balance 181,365,321.08 181,365,321.08
Effective Rate of Return 2.93% 2.93%
I certify that this report accurately reflects ail City pooled investments and is in comformity with the investment policy adopted March 5, 2003. A copy of the investment policy is available in the
Administrative Services Department. The Investment Program herein shown provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet the next six months estimated expenditures. The month-end market values
were obtained from (IDC)-Interactive Data Corporation pricing service.
The attached Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents as of the prior month's end is provided under the City official Investment Policy. The provisions of the individual bond documents
govern the management of these funds.
Portfolio CiTY
CP
Run Date: 08/10/2004 - ra;46 PM (PRF_PM1) SymRept V6,21
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Portfolio Management Page 2
Portfolio Details - Investments
July 31,2004
A~rage Purchase Stated YI'M Days to Maturity
CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rata Moody's 360 Maturity Date
Local Agency Investment Funds
SYSOOO05 00005 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND 23,730,050.22 23,730,050.22 23,730,050.22 1.604 1.582 1
Subtotal and Average 26,423~62.24 23,730,050.22 23,730,050.22 23,730,05~.22 1.582 1
Certificates of Deposit/Neg. - Bank
06050E6Q3 1228 BANK OF AMERICA 06/27/2003 1,515,000.00 1,509,721.59 1,515,000.00 2.150 2.150 393 00/29/2005
Subtntal and Average 1,515,000.00 1,515,000.00 1,509,721.59 1~515,900.00 2.150 393
Federal Agency Issues - Coupon
31331QK55 1199 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 05/19/2003 2,500,000.00 2,441,406.25 2,496,875.00 3.120 3.104 1,387 05/19/2008
31331QM79 1205 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 06/03/2003 2,000,000.00 1,958,125.00 2,~00,CO0.00 3.210 3.166 1,402 06/03/2008
31331QN78 1207 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 06/09/2003 5,500,000.OD 5,388,281.25 5,500,000.00 2.440 2.407 950 03/09/2007
31331Q7C6 1226 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 08Jl 3/2003 3,000,000.CO 2,965,312.50 2,995,312.50 3.050 3.049 1,107 08/13/2007
31331TFG1 1231 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 09/24/2003 2,000,000.00 1,g90,000.00 1,996,562.50 3.370 3.370 1,149 09/24/2007
31331TGV7 1236 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 10/27/2003 3,000,000.00 2,975,625.00 3,000,000.00 3.010 2.969 999 04/27/2007
31331THR5 1241 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 11/10/2003 2,000,000.00 1,990,625.00 2,000,000.00 3.170 3.127 1,012 05/10/2007
31331TND9 1244 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 12/17/2003 2,600,000.00 1,974,375.00 2,000,000.00 3.970 3.916 1,416 06Jl 7/2008
31331TWH0 1253 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 05/17/2OO~ 2,000,000~00 1,931,875.00 2,000,000.00 3.240 3.196 1,324 ~3/17/2(X)8
31331TWJ6 1254 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 05/17/2004 4,000,000.00 3,857,500.00 3,997,500.00 3.550 3.517 1,569 11/17/2008
31331TG62 1263 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 04/29/2004 3,500,000.00 3,489,062.50 3,479,000.00 3.920 4.012 1,548 10/27/2008
31331TU25 1272 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 06/10/2004 3,000,000.00 3,028,125.00 3,000,000.00 4.0C~ 3.945 1,226 12/10/2007
31331TV57 1274 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 07/07/2004 1,500,000.00 1,502,812.50 1,499,531.25 4.220 4.172 1,254 01/07/2008
31339XJJ4 1210 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/12/2003 5,000,000.00 4,900,000.00 5,000,000.00 2.650 2.614 1,044 06/11/2007
31339X~78 1211 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/16/2003 3,000,000.00 2,937,187.50 3,000,000.00 2.430 2.397 957 05/15/2007
31339XLB8 1212 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/19/2003 2,000,000.00 1,957,500.00 2,000,000.00 2.625 2.589 1,052 06/19/2007
31339XPL2 1213 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/26/2003 2,000,000.00 1,937,51~.00 2,000,000.00 2.450 2.417 1,151 09/26/2007
31339YHG0 1218 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 07/16/2003 3,000,000.00 2,940,000.00 3,000,000.00 2.540 2.506 988 04/16J'2007
3133X1P27 1237 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 10/27/2003 3,000,000.00 2,996,250.(X3 3,000,000.00 4.000 3.945 1,548 10/27/2008
3133X3OX8 1247 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 01/29/2004 2,000,000.00 1,988,750.00 2,000,000.00 3.355 3.310 1,184 10/29/2007
3133X3E25 1248 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 01/29/2004 2,000,000.00 1,986,250.00 2,000,000.00 3.320 3.275 1,184 10/29/2007
3133X4MR9 1255 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 03/26/2004 5,000,000.00 4,951,562.50 5,000,000.00 2.750 2.713 877 12/20/2006
3133X4XF3 1256 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 03/29/2004 2,000,000.00 1,954,375.00 2,000,000.00 3.500 3.452 1,244 12~6/2007
3133XSWA2 1264 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 04/30/2004 2,000,000.00 1,970,625.00 2,000,000.00 3.210 3.167 1,277 01/30/2008
3133X77K4 1268 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/26/2004 2,000,000.00 2,010,000.00 2,000,000.00 4.080 4.025 1,304 02/26/2008
3133X76T6 1269 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/25/2004 2,000,000.00 2,016,875.00 1,999,375.00 4.070 4.024 1,306 02/25/2008
3133XTFR0 1273 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/17/2004 3,000,000.00 3,008,437.50 3,000,000.CO 4,250 4193 1,324 03/17/2008
3128X1BD8 1198 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 05/19/2CO3 5,000,000.C~ 4,952,845.00 4,993,750.00 3.500 3.479 1,387 05/19/2008
Portfolio CITY
CP
Run Date: 08/10)2004 - 16:46 PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept V6.21
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Portfolio Management Page 3
Portfolio Details - Investments
July 31,2004
Average Purchase Stated ~"rM Days to Maturity
CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Data Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 360 Maturity Data
Federal Agency Issues - Coupon
3128X1FG7 1203 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 05/28/2003 3,000,000.00 2,960,321.96 3,000,000.00 2.500 2.466 849 11/28/20(~
3128X1DK0 1204 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 05/28/2003 4.000,000.00 3.941.256.10 4,000.000.CO 3.100 3.058 1.214 11/28/2007
3128X1JD0 1208 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 06/12/2003 5.000,000.00 4.866.374.97 4,998.500.00 3.030 2.965 1.410 06/11/2008
3128X1JN8 1209 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 06/12/2003 2,000,000.00 1,948,089.80 2,0CO,000.00 2.400 2.367 1,044 06/11/2007
3128X1L96 1233 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 10/08/2003 4,000,000.00 3,984,503,78 3,997,600.00 2.800 2.782 777 09/17/2006
3128X12K2 1230 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 11/05/2003 4,000,000.00 4,004,485.85 3,983,125 00 4.010 4.048 1,543 10P.2/2008
3128X2P25 1257 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 03/30/2004 3,000,000.00 2,986,031.80 3,000,C~0.00 4.000 3.945 1,702 03/30/2009
3128X07G8 1258 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 04/12/2004 1,250,000.00 1,244,605.09 1,248,750.00 3.650 3.626 1,375 05/07/2008
3128X25Y7 1260 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 04/19/2004 2,000,000.C~ 1,963,532.10 1,997,600.00 2.920 2.916 1,174 10/19/2007
3128X3BF9 1261 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 04/20/2004 1.CO0.000.00 992.133.03 1.000.000.00 3.280 3.235 1.181 10/20/2007
3128X3CS0 1262 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 04/29/2004 5,000,000.00 4,983,025.36 5,000,000.00 3.450 3.403 1,184 10/29/2007
3128X3FD0 1266 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 05/17/2004 2,000,000,00 2,001,144.10 2,000,000.00 3.500 3.452 1,019 05/17/2007
3129X3FC2 1267 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 05/24/2004 3,000,000.00 3,008,195.80 2,999,062.50 3.750 3.708 1,209 11/23/2007
3136F3VQ6 1202 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 05/27/2003 7,000,000.00 6.849,062.50 6,996,500.00 2.500 2.479 1.027 03/25/2007
3136F3Q82 1219 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 07/16/2003 4,000,000.00 3,901,250.00 4,000,000.00 2.500 2.466 1,079 07/16/2007
3136F32F2 1222 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 07/29/2003 4,000,000,00 3,923,750.00 3,993,750.00 3.300 3.289 1.458 07/29/2008
3136F4645 1243 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 12/12/2003 2,000,000.00 1.985,000.00 2,000,000.00 3.300 3.255 863 12/12/2006
3136F5EE7 1250 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 05/05/2004 3,000,000.00 2,973,750.00 2,999,062.50 3.750 3.707 1,590 12/08/2008
3136F5GP0 1252 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 05/16/2004 4,O00,000.CO 3,986.250.00 4,000,000.00 4.040 3.985 1,688 03/13/2009
3136F5PB1 1259 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 04/12/2004 1.000.000.00 985.937.50 1.CO0.000.00 3.020 2.979 1.167 10/12/2CO7
3136FSZV6 1270 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 06/03/2004 5,(X30,000.CO 5,010,937.50 5,000,000.00 4.300 4.242 1,310 03/03/2008
Subtotst and Average 147,881,624.40 148~50,000.00 146,501,019.84 148,171,856.25 3.236 1,223
Treasury Securities - Coupon
912828CG3 1271 TREASURY NOTE 06/09/2004 5,000,000.00 6,015,625.00 4,985,54~,88 3.125 3.184 1,017 03/13/2007
Subtotal and Average 4,985,546.88 5~000,000.00 5,015,625.00 4,985,546.88 3.184 1,017
Total and A~rage 181,365,321.08 178,495,050.22 176,756,416.65 178,402,453.35 3.005 1,048
Portfolio CITY
CP
Date: 08/10~2004 - 16:46 PM (PRF_PM2) Syn~ept V6.21
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Portfolio Management Page 4
Portfolio Details - Cash
July 31, 2004
Average Purchase Stated Y'FM Days to
CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 360 Maturity
Savings/Miscellaneous Accounts
SYS00180 00180 BANK OF AMERICA 983,929.88 983,929.88 983,929.88 0.500 0.493 1
Average Balance 0.00 Accrued Interest at Purchase 11,377.03 11,377.03 1
Subtotal 995,306.91 995,306.91
Totel Cash and Investmentss 181,365,321.08 179,478,980.10 177,751,723.56 179,397,760.26 3.005 1,048
Portfolio CITY
CP
Dat e: 08/10/2004 - 16:46 PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept V6.21
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Portfolio Management Page 5
Activity By Type
July 1, 2004 through July 31,2004
Beginning Stated Transaction Purchases Redemptions Ending
CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Rate Data or D~poslta or Withdrawals Balance
Local Agency Investment Funds (Monthly Summary)
SYS00005 0~005 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND 1.604 3,415,030.53 8,s00,000.00
Subtotal 29,215,019.68 3,415,030.53 8,900,000.00 23,730,050.22
Savings/Miscellaneous Accounts (Monthly Summary)
SYSO0180 00180 BANK OF AMERICA 0.500 438,177.C~ 0.00
Subtotal 545,752.82 438,177.06 0.00 983,929.88
Certificates of DeposiVNeg. - Bank
Subtotal 1,515,000.00 1,515,000.00
Federal Agency Issues - Coupon
31331TV57 1274 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT SANK 4.220 07107/2004 1,499,531.25
Subtotal 146,672,325,00 1,499,531,25 0.00 148,171,856.25
Treasury Securities - Coupon
Subtotal 4,985,546.88 4,985,546.88
Total 182,933,644.39 5,352,738.84 8,900,000.00 179,386,383.23
Po~folio CITY
Oate: 0~/10/2004 - 16:46 PM (PRF_PM3) Sy~nRept V6.21
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents
For the Month Ended June 30, 2004
Trustee and/or Purchase Maturity Cost
Bond Issue Paylna Aaent Account Name Investment Date Date Yield Value
Assessment District No 93-1 US Bank Imprvmnt Fund First Amedcan Treasury Obligation 8/4/1997 N/A* 0.56% $ 257,311.78
Masi Plaza Imprvrnnt Fund Cash N/A N/A N/A
Reserve Fund First American Treasury Obligation 8/4/1997 N/A* 0,56% 242,874.86
Reserve Fund N/A N/A N/A
Redemp. Fund First Amedcan Treasury Obligation 8/4/1997 N/A 0.52% 382.53
Redemp. Fund Cash N/A N/A N/A
$ 500,569.17
PFA RFDG Rev Bonds series US Bank Expense Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A* 0.00% $
Cash N/A N/A N/A
1999 A (Sr) & 1999 B (Subord) Sub Resrv. Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A* 0.56% 581,377.05
Cash N/A N/A N/A
Sr. Resrv. Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A* 0.56% 1,092,187.06
Cash N/A N/A N/A
Redemption Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A* 0.00%
Cash N/A N/A N/A
Revenue Fund First Amedcan Treasury Obligation 3/2/2000 N/A* 0.00%
Cash N/A N/A N/A
Residual Fund First Amedcan Treasury Obligation 1/16/2001 N/A* 0.56% 119,718.53
Cash N/A N/A N/A
$ 1,793,282.64
TOTAL CASH AND INVESTMENTS WITH FISCAL AGENTS $ 2,293,851.8.~_1
· Note: These investments are money market accounts which have no stated matudty dste as they may be liquidated upon demand.
i:tfinanceICash with Fiscal Agents.xls 7/13/2004 12:17 PM
T H E C I T Y 0 F
I~ANCII 0 CUCAMONGA
Staff Repor
DATE: August 18, 2004
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Maria E. Perez, Associate Engineer
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF AN APPROPRIATION OF $1,001,822, TO CAPITAL
RESERVE ACCOUNT NO. 10250015300, FOR THE ENVIRONMENTAL
REVIEW AND CONSTRUCTION OF THE EMERGENCY EROSION
CONTROL PROJECTS, NECESSARY IN THE WAKE OF THE GRAND
PRIX FIRE, TO BE FUNDED FROM RESERVE FUND BALANCE
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of an appropriation of $1,001,822, to account No.
10250015300, for the environmental review and construction of the emergency erosion
control projects, necessary in the wake of the Grand Prix Fire, to be funded from capital
reserve fund balance.
BACKGROUND
Immediately after the Grand Prix Fire, key staff members were assembled as a team to
prepare the City for the expected winter floods. The team is comprised of staff from the
City's Engineering Division, Maintenance Crew, Fire Department, Administrative
Services Finance Group and the Police Department. The first order of business was to
become familiar with the burned terrain that posed a threat to residents and City
facilities. Engineering and Maintenance gathered maps, plans of existing facilities and
walked the burned areas along the north edge of the City. Initial field reviews revealed
the areas of the community that appeared to be most vulnerable.
Concurrently, team members from Engineering, Finance and Fire attended information
sessions sponsored by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the
Governor's Office of Emergency Services (OES) and the Natrual Resource
Conservation Service (NCRS) on how and where communities would be able to seek
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Re: Environmental Review and Construction of the Emergency Erosion Control Projects
August 18, 2004
Page 2
funding and reimbursement for emergency measures taken in response to the fire and
the impending floods. Rancho Cucamonga was represented at every training session
and briefing that occurred during the months of October and November.
As the burned area was studied by representatives of FEMA for the potential of
flooding, we noted there was limited information on the areas within the City that sit
above San Bernardino County Flood Control debris basins. FEMA developed a post-
fire advisory flood map, which is a determination of an expanded flood hazard threat
beyond the standard flood maps on file at City Offices.
With the fire threat over, the next cdsis to face were the imminent debris flows from the
burned areas. Debds production is very difficult to predict even in areas where
precipitation data is available. Additionally, engineering standard debris yield
calculations ara based on conditions 5 years after a burn where the hillsides have had
time to revegetate. Therefore, if the winter storm season was heavy it could pose a
significant threat to the northwest quadrant of the City because those areas had virtually
no revegetation in such a short span of time. Staff efforts were immediately dedicated
to deploying available protective measures as well as educating the residents about the
looming threat.
Team members participated in assembling preparedness handouts for residents,
including the development of an erosion control handout that won a Capio Award of
Distinction for Special Publication. Research on which measures residents could take
on their own to protect themselves and their property was conducted and made
available to the public via channel 3, through the Internet and by mailers.
A community meeting was organized and held on December 12, 2003 at Chaffee
Community College. Residents throughout the northern part of the City were invited to
padicipate. Accommodations were made for up to 700 hundred attendees.
Representatives from the California Department of Forestry, FEMA, San Bernardino
County Flood Control, City Fire Department and the Engineering Division provided an
update on the situation and fielded resident's questions. Information on Flood
Insurance and property protection was also made available.
At this time, an audit was conducted by Public Works staff and Engineering to identify
materials and equipment available at the City Yard (e.g. sand bags, sand, K-rail) which
would be vital in emergency response and preparedness measures. The City had 11
sections of k-rail in storage that were distributed to the locations determined to be of
highest risk. An order for additional k-rail was immediately placed. Sand bags and
sand were made available to residents at several fire stations throughout town.
Simultaneously, staff engineers were also working with NRCS to gain funding for
temporary protection measures. A list of measures developed by the Engineering Team
identified minimum protection measures for residents and was reviewed in the field with
representatives from NRCS on two different occasions. At the time, NRCS did not have
funds at their disposal to implement the recommended measures, however FEMA
agreed to accommodate the projects recommended by NRCS in early December. This
included the purchase and placement of several debris racks and some of the k-rail. ,,~
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Re: Environmental Review and Construction of the Emergency Erosion Control Projects
August 18, 2004
Page 3
When the Christm, as storm hit, City Fire and Maintenance Crews were on the scene
placing additional k-rail and working tirelessly, around-the-clock to protect residents and
property from the waves of mud. As the storm ebbed, the engineering team completed
additional field reviews to survey damage and clean-up efforts. This field review
revealed that immediate measures were needed to be taken in order to clean up the
damage from the Christmas storm, as well as to prevent against any possible
impending storms that could lead to further destruction of public or private property.
Successive adjustments were made throughout the remainder of the rain season.
Shortly after the Christmas flood, the disaster declaration for the Grand Prix Fire was
extended to include flooding. Staff pushed for consideration of all qualified flood
protection measures within FEMA's project guidelines to receive the maximum federal
reimbursement. Staff ,worked with the Public Assistance Coordinator assigned to the
City by FEMA to prepare project worksheets and relative backup information for each
location.
Final proposals were submitted for review on March 29, 2004. FEMA ruled that several
of the measures proposed by the City were not eligible for funding. The total of the
City's original request submitted for consideration was $1,511,554.50. $853,717.50 of
the original amount was found to be eligible for reimbursement under FEMA guidelines,
of that amount FEMA reimburses 75% with the City obligated for the remaining 25%.
~ 1
The City s obligated portion of this amount is $213,429.00.
For various reasons, not all of our recommended projects were approved for funding.
These projects are very important and we recommend the City provide funding so all
identified projects can be built. The cost of the remaining projects amounts to $638,042
plus an additional $100,000 for a spillway at Bella Vista, which FEMA chose not to fund.
Staff is currently exploring other avenues for reimbursement of those projects, which
FEMA deemed ineligible. There exists the possibility that the State, through the
Governor's Office of Emergency Services (OES), may reimburse up to 18.75% of the ·
City's portion of the project costs. Approval for the reimbursement has already been
issued by the Governor's office, however due to California State budget issues the
money has not been released. As of the date of this report, the state legislature is in
control of disbursing the money and there is no word yet on whether or not the money
will be releasedz.
The flood control/erosion projects identified by staff total $853,717.50. In
correspondence with this figure, engineering staff has identified the need for an
additional $23,500.003 that will cover the environmental review costs for these projects.
These projects will also require technical plan checking. There are several parts of the
designs such as a spillway and structural calculations for street crossings that will
~ See Funding Breakout Table on Page 6.
2 The estimated total costs of these projects still under review are $638,042. These costs are included in the
requested appropriation and are included in the Funding Breakout Table on Page 6. ,, ,/
3 See Funding Breakout Table on Page 6.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Re: Environmental Review and Constru~ion ofthe Eme~encyErosion Control Pr~e~s
August18,2004
Page 4
require outside specialty technical checking. Staff's estimate for the required technical
reviews amounts to $21,900.004.
The estimated total cost for the City to finance all of the projects including funding for
FEMA matching funds is $1,001,822. Council has already appropriated funding for the
design portions of these projects and the City's consultant has completed the
preliminary stages of design. Currently, the process of formalizing the designs into
engineered drawings and specifications is underway. The project manager has
indicated that a submittal for plan check is expected before the end of August. At that
time, staff will review the drawings and specifications. Final design of the series of
projects is expected to be complete by the first of October. Staff intends to have the
projects out to bid by mid October and under construction as soon as possible
thereafter. If staff can provide technically acceptable plans and specifications for all or
part of the projects at an earlier date, they will be brought before Council for permission
to advertise.
Staff also applied for nine Hazard Mitigation Grants through the OES. The applications
were submitted April 1, 2004 and are currently under review. The OES has indicated
that the funds set aside for the current disaster have already been spoken for but our
projects will remain in the queue for Pre-disaster Mitigation Funds. These funds require
approval before a project begins construction and that will not be until next year. It is
the City's desire to have the projects completed as soon as possible, which makes
waiting for construction through a second rainy season unreasonable.
Cost allocations for the above projects have now been determined and these projects
are necessary in order to address future emergency needs. Therefore, it is
recommended Council approve these improvements and allocate the necessary City
share from the Capital Reserve Fund, which exists primarily for such emergency
situations, to allow for these projects to move forward.
See Funding Breakout Table on Page 6. ~,~,~
CiTY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Re: Environmental Review and Construction of the Emergency Erosion Control Projects
August 18, 2004
Page 5
A iisting of the projects targeted in this report is as follows:
LOCATION ASSETS PROTECTED PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT COST
406 LF k-rail, 300 LF bag
Crestview Dr. & Crastview
Crestview @ N. City limits Ct. (residences) high, sandbags, remove $11,925.00
mud/sediment behind levee
Crestview Dr. & Crestview Increase height of berm - $10,000.00
Crestview @ N. City limits Ct. (residences) 500 LF
Place k-rail, repair
Skyline Dr. at N. City limits Skyline Dr. and adjacent streambed, rock armour at
residences curve, place debris rack, $54,380.00
add to inlet sb-ucture
70 LF k-rail, remove
Almond & residences
Almond W/O Carnelian adjacent to the south mud/sediment from $2,100.00
pavement
N/O La Colina & Via Paraiso Almond & residences 420 LF k-rail (placed 3-3-04)
knuckle adjacent to channel and construct debris rack 70 $132,050.00
LF
N/O La Colina & Via Paraiso Almond & residences Construct inlet structure at
knuckle adjacent to channel north end of channel $60,780.00
N/O Almond, W/O Carnelian Bella Vista, Carnelian & 150' Debris rack at nodh
surrounding residences end of wash $246,375.00
Replace undersized
N/O Almond, W/O Bella Vista, Carnelian and channel, construct spillway,
debris rack and berms to $362,160.00
Carnelian5 surrounding residences direct flows to center of
canyon
King's Ranch Rd, E/O King's Ranch estate homes Construct debds racks 70
Gateway LF $34,250.00
Construct Iow flow drainage
Amethyst at Almond Residents to the south system, reconstruct street, $139,207.00
armour inlet
Construct concrete down
Huntswood, N/O North face of debris basin drain within existing basin to
Meadowood and homes to the south intercept flows from the $19,887.00
north
Place debris rack in
Hermosa at Almond Homes to the south streambed, build debds $263,380.00
basin w/Iow-flow outlet, k-rail
Place debris racks at
Hermosa at Almond Homes to the south crossing, dp-rap at outlet, .$275,060.00
berm E./O streambed
s This project requires an additional $100,000 for the construction of the spillway, which is not eligible for funding
under FEMA. This amount is included in the Funding Breakout Table on Page 6.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Re: Environmental Review and Constru~ion ofthe Eme~ency Erosion Control Projects
August18,2004
Page 6
Related to the projects listed above, the requested $1,001,822.00 will .provide for the
following:
$ 23,500.00 Environmental Review Costs
$ 21,900.00 Technical Plan Check Costs
$ 218,380.00 City portion of Eligible projects
$ 638,042.00 Estimated cost of unfunded projects (thoserejected
by FEMAi but currently under consideration by OES)
$ 100,000.00 Bella Vista Spillway, not included at FEMA's
discretion
$ 1,001,822.00 Estimated Total for completion
The construction estimates above were created using FEMA approved national rates.
These estimates may vary considerably in the current construction market. Additional
appropriations to match the difference will be requested at the time the individual
projects are awarded. The construction of the flood mitigation measures is a one-time-
expense; the projects will be competitively bid as soon as practicable.
Respectfully submitted,
Wi~'~ J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:DJ:tch
Attachment
THE CITY OF
t~AN CI~ 0 C U CAM 0 N GA
DATE: August 18, 2004
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AiCP, City Manager
FROM: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director
BY: Karen McGuire-Emery, Senior Park Planner
SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO AWARD DESIGNATED CONTRACTS TO THE SPECIFIED SUB-
CONTRACTORS, FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CULTURAL CENTER PROJECT, TOTALING $22,052,625 AND AUTHORIZE THE
EXPENDITURE OF A 5% CONTINGENCY FOR EACH CONTRACT, TOTALING
$1,102,631 TO BE FUNDED FROM THE FOLLOWING SOURCES: RDA 2001 TAX
ALLOCATION BONDS ACCOUNT NO. 2650801-5650/1357650-6314 ($3,176,850);
RDA 2004 TAX ALLOCATION BONDS ACCOUNT NO. 2656801-5650/1357660-6314
($7,932,535); STATE LIBRARY GRANT FUNDS ACCOUNT NO. 1310602-
5650/1357310-6314 ($5,382,087); CITY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK
GRANT FUNDS ACCOUNT NO. 1204314-5650/1388204-6314 ($464,064); COUNTY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS ACCOUNT NO. 1205301-
5650/1357205-6314 ($500,000); AND FOREST CITY PARTICIPATION FUNDS
ACCOUNT NO. 1615303-5650/1357615-6314 ($5,699,620); AND AUTHORIZE THE
APPROPRIATION OF $3,176,850 INTO ACCOUNT NO. 2650801-5650/13575650-
6314; $7,932,535 INTO ACCOUNT NO. 2660801-5650/1357660-6314; $2,428,937
INTO ACCOUNT NO. 1310602-5650/1357310-6314; $67,994 INTO ACCOUNT
NO.1204314-5650/1388204-6314; AND $500,000 INTO ACCOUNT NO. 1205301-
5650/1357205-6314.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council accept the bids received and award and authorize the
execution of contracts totaling $22,052,625 to the listed sub-contractors, for the construction of
the Rancho Cucamonga Cultural Center Project to be funded from the accounts listed above,
and authorize the appropriation of $3,176,850 into Account Number 2650801-5650/13575650-
6314; $7,932,535 into Account Number 2660801-5650/1357660-6314; $2,428,937 into
Account Number 1310602-5650/1357310-6314; $67,994 into Account Number 1204314-
5650/1388204-6314; and $500,000 into Account Number 1205301-5650/1357205-6314.
RANCHO CUCAMONGA CULTURAL CENTER BIDS
August 18, 2004
Side 2
Funding for a portion of the City CDBG Funds Account Number 1204314-5650/138.8204-6314;
a portion of funding from the State Library Grant Funds Account Number 1310602-
5650/1357310-6314, as well as the Forest City Participation Funds Account Number 1615303-
5650/1357615-6314 are included in the adopted FY 2004/05 Budget. These appropriations
include the 5% contingency.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
Construction documents for the Rancho Cucamonga Cultural Center Project were broken
down by trade into 26 separate bid packages. (see attached Bid Package Table - Priority 1
and 2) On June 2, 2004, the City solicited bids for 15 of the 26 contracts. Bids for these 15
bid packages were received and opened on Tuesday, July 27, 2004. The total of the Iow bids
received for the 15 bid packages was 6% over the Construction Manager's cost estimate of
$27,178,390. Upon investigation, staff and the Construction Manager determined that this
increased cost was due to the continuing increase in costs for steel, metal and concrete
materials. On August 4, 2004, the City Council awarded the Structural Steel contract to W&W
Steel Company. All of the other initial 14 bid packages received were reviewed to ensure
compliance with the bid requirements. The remaining 11 bid packages (see attached Bid
Package Table - Priority 3) are currently being reviewed for value engineering cost savings
and will be advertised and awarded at a later date.
Funds for construction of the project are from a variety of sources including a state library grant
of almost $7.8 Million, financial participation by the mall developer, Forest City, and RDA funds
generated through the sale of Tax Allocation bonds, as well as City and County Community
Development Block Grant Funds. No City General Funds will be used for construction of the
Cultural Center.
It is anticipated that construction will be completed in the spring/summer of 2006.
· Community Services Director
Attachments
RANCHO CUCAMONGA CULTURAL CENTER June 1, 2004
BID PACKAGE PRIORITY GROUPS
Bid Pkg IDescrlptl°n
SUBTOTAL - PRIORITY 1
03-1 Concrete, Concrete Reinforcement, Earthwork
05-1 Structural Steel, Misc. Metals and Metal Decking
09-1 Metal Stud Framing, Drywall, Plaster, Acoustical Insulation and
Sealants, Fireproofing, Firestopping and Doore
'Frames/Hardware
14-1 Elevators
15-1 Fire Protection Systems
15-2 Plumbing & Site Utilities
15-3 Heating, Ventilating and Air Conditioning
16-1 Electrical
SUBTOTAL - PRIORITY 2
01-1 Manlift/Material Hoist
04-1 Precast Concrete and Unit Masonry
06-1 Finish Carpentry and Architectural Woodwork
07-1 Built-up Roofing and Waterproofing
07-2 Sheet Metal Roofing / Underiayment insulation, Flashing, Sheet
Metal, Metal Panels and Roof Hatches
08-2 Glass and Glazing
09-3 Ceramic Tile
SUBTOTAL - PRIORITY 3
01-2 Final Clean-up
02-1 Landscaping, Irriagation Systems and Site Furnishings
02-2 Site Concrete
02-3 Bituminous Concrete Paving, Pavement Markings
09-2 Tackable Wallboard Systems, Acoustical Treatments and
Acoustical Ceiling Systems
09-4 Resilient Flooring and Carpeting
09-5 Painting and Wall Coverings
10-1 Fire Extinguishers Cabinets, Toilet/Bath Accessories, Metal
Lockers, Markerboards/Tackboards, Miscellaneous Specialties,
Coiling Door Systems, Window Coverings and Operable
~Partitions and Hydraulic Lifts
11-1 !Theater Rigging Systems and Theatrical Draperies
11-2 Food Service Equipment
12-1 Theater Seating
Low Bid Summary
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Rancho Cucamonga Cultural Center
Bid Date &Time: July27,2004 @ 2:00 p.m.
BID PACKAGE BREAKDOWN
BID APPARENT LOW
PKG. # BID PACKAGE DESCRIPTION SUBCONTRACTOR BID AMOUNT
1-1 Manlift/Material Hoist SHEEDY HOIST $126~298
3-1 Concrete, Concrete Reinfomement, PRIZIO CONSTRUCTION
Earthwork, Lightweight Insul. Conc. $3~207r777
4-1 Precast Concrete and Unit Masonry JB MCGALLIARD & SONS
$579~65."
6-1 Finish Carpentry and Amhitectuml ISEC INC.
Woodwork $483~384
7-1 Built-up Roofing and Waterproofing LETNER ROOFING CO. $379~98c.
7-2 Sheet Metal Roofing / Underlayment CROWNER SHEET METAL
Insulation, Flashing, Sheet Metal, Metal
Panels and Roof Hatches $627r500
8-1 Glass and Glazing HUNTINGTON GLASS $458~468
9-1 Metal Stud Framing, Drywall, Plaster, STANDARD DRYWALL INC.
Acoustical Insulation and Sealants,
Fireproofing, Firestopping and Doors
~Frames/Hardware $6r968~040
9-3 ;eramic Tile _AMBARD, INC. $365r414
14-1 Elevators MITSUBISHI $216r100
15-1 Fire Protection Systems COSCO FIRE
PROTECTION $670r000
15-2 Plumbing & Site Utilities TEMECULA MECHANICAL
CO. $1 r090~000
15-3 Heating, Ventilating and Air Conditioning ACH MECHANICAL
CONTRACTORS $2~4101000
16-1 Electrical BERGELECTRIC CORP. $4~470~000
TOTAL $22,052,625
PROJECT BUDGET SUMMARY
BID PACKAGE BID AMOUNT $22,052,625
5% PROJECT CONTINGENCY $1,102,631
TOTAL $23,155,256
Page 1 of 1 ~//
~ A C h 0 C U C A M O N G A
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Staff Report
DATE: August 18, 2004
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A CONTRACT AMENDMENT (CONTRACT CO 0J'-090)
ADJUSTING THE HOURLY RATE FOR INSPECTION SERVICES
PROVIDED BY ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS, INC.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council, by minute action, authorize the inspection .
hourly rate be adjusted from $58.00 per hour to $62.00 per hour for Associated
Engineers, Inc., contract CO 03-090.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSI~
At the City Council meeting of July 7, 2004 the City Council authorized the continued
utilization of Associated Engineers, Inc., for contract inspection services. Associated
Engineers, Inc., is continuing their scope of services under an existing contract
approved by City Council on September 3, 2003, Contract CO 03-090. At that time, the
hourly rate of $58.00 was offered to the City, discounted from their normal rate of
$68.00 per hour.
Currently, Associated Engineers is requesting an adjustment of the rate to $62.00 per
hour, up $4.00 from the rate agreed upon in September 2003. Though it is an increase,
it is still below their normal rate of $68.00. This increase is directly attributed to
increased costs including insurance and gasoline. Additionally, Associated Engineers,
Inc., provides for their inspectors' vehicles and cell phones at no extra charge to Rancho
Cucamonga.
The increase to $62.00 per hour is still highly competitive when comparing rates with
other inspection firms. Staff has informally contacted various other construction
inspection consultants to determine the market rate for inspection services and has
determined that the requested fee structure of Associated Engineers is below average
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
INSPECTION SERVICES
July 7, 2004
PAGE 2
· market rates. Due to the extremely heavy workload for inspection services it is
necessary to utilize contract consulting services. It should be noted costs are incurred
only when work is done. There are no on call or retainer costs. Staff recommends City
Council authorize the requested increase.
Respectfully submitted,
WiftL~ J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:DJ:tch
Attachment
~ NG I N 1~ g DIN G D ~ PAD TMI~N T
Staff Report
DA~E: August 18, 2004
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF PAYMENT AGREEMENT BY AND AMONG THE ONTARIO
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
REGARDING INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS ALONG 4TM
STREET BE'TWEEN HAVEN AVENUE AND MILLIKEN AVENUE, FUNDS TO
BE APPROPRIATED FROM TRANSPORTATION AND BEAUTIFICATION IN
FISCAL YEAR 2005/06
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the Payment
Agreement and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The City of Ontario Redevelopment Agency would like to move forward with public
improvements along 4~h Street between Haven Avenue and Milliken Avenue. The
improvements consist of median island, median landscape, widening the southerly side of the
street, street lights on the south side, traffic signals with interconnect conduit, and an 8' x 11"
RCB storm drain facility extending from Cleveland Avenue to Haven Avenue. The Ontario
Redevelopment Agency's total project cost is approximately 10.2 million dollars.
The City of Ontario requests Rancho Cucamonga share the cost of certain improvements. The
estimated breakdown of the financial obligation of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is as follows:
Improvement Cost R.C. % R.C. Cost
Street Improvements N/A 0% $ 0
Storm Drain Improvements N/A 0% $ 0
Traffic Signals $ 737,000 50% $368,500
Median Curb $ 220,000 50% $110,000
Median Landscape / Irrigation $1,020,000 50% $510,000
$988,500
q¢
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
APPROVAL OF PAYMENT AGREEMENT
August 18, 2004
Page 2
In addition the agreement stipulates maintenance responsibilities. The traffic signals will be
maintained per the existing agreement between Rancho Cucamonga and Ontario. The median
landscaping will be maintained by Ontario at no cost or expense to Rancho Cucamonga. The
60-inch storm drain on the north side of 4th Street between Milliken and Cleveland will be
maintained by Rancho Cucamonga at no cost or expense to Ontario.
Ontario Redevelopment Agency anticipates construction will start January 2005. The first
course of construction will be the storm improvements in the City of Ontario. By the time the
contractor starts the median and Ontario Redevelopment Agency submits for billing it should be
July or August of 2005. Therefore staff is not appropriating any funds at this time. Staff will
make the appropriations with adoption of the budget for fiscal year 2005/06. Funds which will
be used will come from the Transportation and Beautification Fund balances.
Copies of the agreements are available in the City Clerk's office.
Respectfully submitted,
O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:DJ:tch
Attachments
RESOLUTION NO. /) ¥-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
PAYMENT AGREEMENT BY AND AMONG THE ONTARIO
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA REGARDING INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS ALONG 4TM STREET BETWEEN HAVEN
AVENUE AND MILLIKEN AVENUE
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its
consideration a Payment Agreement with Ontario Redevelopment Agency for the installation of
Public Improvements along 4th Street between Haven Avenue and Milliken Avenue; and
WHEREAS, installation of such improvements, described in said Payment Agreement
and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the Ontario Redevelopment
Agency Project; and
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows:
1. That said Payment Agreement be and the same is hereby approved and
the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Payment Agreement on
behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the City Clerk to attest
thereto.
ESTIMATE OF 100% OF IMPROVEMENT COSTS
r) mAFFIC: $10NALS ~737.000 August 9, 2004
MEDIAN CURB CONSTRUCTION ~220,000 EXH I B IT 'A'1
ME01AN LANDSCAPE z. IRRIGATION $1.020,000 FOURTH STREET Ih'IPROVEIVIENTS
PROPOSED DOST SHARING OF IMPROVEMENTS
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Staff Report
DATE: August 18, 2004
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT BY AND AMONG
THE ONTARIO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA AND JEFFERSON ON FOURTH, L.P. REGARDING
INSTALLATION OF 60" STORM DRAIN AND OTHER RELATED
IMPROVEMENTS WITH NO CITY FUNDS INVOLVED FOR PARCEL
MAP 16245, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 4*"
STREET AND MILLIKEN AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY JEFFERSON AT
FOURTH, L.P.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution for Parcel Map 16245,
accepting the subject Reimbursement Agreement, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk
to sign said agreement.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Parcel Map 16245, located at the northwest comer of 4th Street and Milliken Avenue, within the
Mixed Use District of the Rancho Cucamonga Subarea 18 Specific Plan, was approved by the
Planning Commission on November 12, 2003. This project is for a subdivision of 2 parcels on
23.56 acres of land.
The Developer, Jefferson at Fourth, L.p., previously submitted an agreement and securities to
guarantee the construction of 4th Street 60"Storm Drain and other related improvements and was
approved by the City Council on March 17, 2004, in the following amounts:
Faithful Performance Bond $ 380,800.00
Labor and Material Bond $190,400.00
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
PARCEL MAP 16245- JEFFERSON ON FOURTH, L.P.,
August 18, 2004
Page 2
One of the conditions of Parcel Map 16245 is that downstream storm drain systems provide
adequate protection for the development. As a result, the Developer has requested the Ontario
Redevelopment Agency and City of Ontario's approval for Developer to construct a portion of
the ultimate 4th Street storm drain and other related improvements. The 60" storm drain
constructed by the developer will be located on 4th Street and extend from Milliken Avenue
easterly to Cleveland Avenue. These improvements will ultimately connect to a proposed
extension of the storm drain system that will involve the construction of an 8' x 11' reinforced
concrete box extending from Cleveland Avenue to Haven Avenue. This additional extension
will be built by the Ontario Redevelopment Agency beginning in January 2005.
Approval of the Developer's request to allow Developer to proceed with the storm drain
construction will enable Developer's project to be constructed now rather than waiting until the
Ontario RDA Agency constructs said improvements later this year. As an accommodation to
Developer's construction schedule, the City of Ontario and it's Agency and City of Rancho
Cucamonga are agreeable to allow the Developer to install said improvements. Ontario
Redevelopment Agency will reimburse Developer the differential construction cost and City of
Rancho Cucamonga will provide inspections and maintenance pertaining to the 60" storm drain.
This project will be done at no cost to the City of Rancho Cucamonga except for budgeted
inspection costs.
The Developer is submitting a Reimbursement Agreement by and among the Ontario
,Redevelopment Agency, the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Jefferson On Fourth, L.P., for the
installation of the 4th Street 60" storm drain and other related improvements. Copies of the
agreement are available in the City Clerk's office.
Respectfully submitted,
(W~' iam J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:DJ:tch
Attachments
~'PROJECT ~
J[ ,~ / FOURTH STREET
\ g
Z
~Q /~ CONCOURS /~C~A LANE
SHELBY ~ EMPIRE
.... ~~ SAN BERNARDINO FWY
N
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ENGINE. ERING DIVISION EXIJTI~IT: ~
SOL ION NO. ¥" ;2
A RESOLUTION OF THE C1TY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT BY AND AMONG THE
ONTARIO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND JEFFERSON ON FOURTH,
L.P., REGARDING INSTALLATION OF 60'" STORM DRAIN
AND OTHER RELATED IMPROVEMENTS WITH NO CITY
FUNDS INVOLVED FOR PARCEL MAP NO. 16245,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucan~onga, California, has for its
consideration a Reimbursement Agreement submitted by Jefferson On Fourth, L.P., the
Developer, for the installation of 4th Street 60" storm drain and other related improvements and
generally located on the north side of 4th Street between former Cleveland and Milliken
Avenues; and
WHEREAS, installation of such improvements, described in said Reimbursement
Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of
said real property referred to as Parcel Map 16245; and
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows:
1. That said Reimbursement Agreement be and the same is hereby
approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said
Reimbursement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga and the City Clerk to attest thereto.
F~ ,~ N C H 0 C U C A M 0 N G A
ENGINEERING DEPART~IENT
Staff Report
DATE: August 18, 2004
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Michael TenEyck, Administrative Resource Manager
SUBJECT: APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF A PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES AGREEMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF $166,100.00 TO BUTSKO
UTILITY DESIGN INC., FOR SYSTEM PLANNING AND DESIGN OF
STADIUM BUSINESS PARK AND ROCHESTER BUSINESS PARK AND
CONTINUED TECHNICAL ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING SUPPORT '
WITHIN THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY SERVICE
AREA TO BE FUNDED $28,700 FROM 17053035650/1489705-6310,
$37,400 FROM 17053035650/1488705-6310 AND $100,000 FROM
170530353O9
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the City Council authorize the execution of a Professional Services
Agreement in the amount of $166,100.00 to Butsko Utility Design Inc., for system planning
and design of Stadium Business Park and Rochester Business Park and continued
technical electrical engineering support within the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility
service area to be funded $28,700 from 17053035650/1489705-6310, $37,400 from
17053035650/1488705-6310 and $100,000 from 17053035309
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
On August 31, 2001, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council authorized the creation and
operation of a municipally owned utility for the purpose of providing various utility services.
A critical element of the City's plans to serve this area is the construction of an electrical
distribution system to relay energy from the City's substation and interconnection with
Southern Califomia Edison's transmission system, located at the southeast comer of
Rochester Avenue and Stadium Parkway, to the Victoria Arbors Master Plan area. Butsko
Utility Design was selected as the City's electrical design engineer at the October 2, 2002,
Council meeting after Staff had solicited proposals from qualified design firms to provide
the necessary services. Council initiated the preliminary design and final design of the
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
APPROVAL OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN, INC.
FOR VARIOUS SERVICES RELATED TO THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY
AUGUST 18, 2004
PAGE 2
offsite electrical distribution system via the approval of professional services agreements
with Butsko Utility Design on December 18, 2002 and April 16, 2003, respectively. The
project was separated into two major sections: 1) Conduit and Substructure Section; 2)
Cabling, Connections, and Equipment Section. Both sections of these projects are currently
finishing construction.
Additionally, staff solicited a separate proposal from Butsko to provide plan check services
for the distribution conduit and substructure system and design services for the cabling,
connection, and equipment to serve the Stadium Business Park located on the south of the
substation on Rochester Ave. and Rochester Business Park to be located on the west side
of Rochester Avenue south of Arrow.
As the City's electrical design engineer and architect of the distribution system, Butsko is
uniquely qualified to provide inspection, design and project management services for these
vitally important and time-sensitive projects.
The developers of these projects are conditioned to be served by the Rancho Cucamonga
Municipal Utility and have requested the City to begin design of the conduit and
substructure system for these sites. This portion of Rancho Cucamonga's ultimate electric
distribution system is outside of the scope of Butsko's original design that was limited to the
Victoria Gardens Mall onsite system and the offsite system within Rochester Avenue,
Foothill Boulevard and Day Creek Boulevard.
Stadium Business Park and Rochester Business Park will pay the City for all costs for plan
check and design services associated with the developments per the provisions of their
approved Service Distribution Line Extension Agreements.
Lastly, staff identified ongoing consultant services that will be required to address
operational and technical issues during the Municipal Utility's start-up period. Staff solicited
a separate proposal for these services. Staff projected a budget for these services based
upon the anticipated number of hours of assistance that will be required for the fiscal year
2004-05 and the hourly rate for electrical design services. These cost were included within
the original business model approved by Council on April 16, 2003. However, the City will
only pay for services actually rendered and are not committed to any minimum monthly
charges.
The breakdown of the various services proposed and their associated costs is as follows:
· System planning and design of the onsite electrical substructure plans and the
design of the onsite Electrical Cable, Connections and Equipment Project for the
Rochester Business Park development in the amount not to exceed of $37,400 per
the provisions of their Service Distribution Line Extension Agreement.
· System planning and design of the onsite electrical substructure plans and ihe
design of the onsite Electrical Cable, Connections and Equipment Project for the
CiTY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
APPROVAL OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN, INC.
FOR VARIOUS SERVICES RELATED TO THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY
AUGUST 18, 2004
PAGE 3
Stadium Business Park development in the amount not to exceed of $28,700 per the
provision of their Service Distribution Line Extension Agreement..
· Continuing consultant services for electric distribution operations and technical
support for the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility in the amount not to exceed of
$100,000.
The combined cost for all services is $166,100. It is recommended the City Council
authorize the execution of a Professional Services Agreement in the amount of
$166,100.00 to Butsko Utility Design Incl, for system planning and design of Stadium
Business Park and Rochester Business Park and continued technical electrical engineering
support within the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility service area to be funded $28,700
from 17053035650/1489705-6310, $37,400 from 17053035650/1488705-6310 and
$100,000 from 17053035309.
Respectfully submitted,
Wi~3~/n J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:DJ:tch
Attachment
R A N C H O C U c A M O N G A
F 1
COMMUNITY ~ERVICES
Staff Report
DATE: August 18, 2004
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director
BY: Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A CONTRACT BETVVEEN THE COUNTY OF SAN
BERNARDINO AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FOR
$500,000 IN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
FUNDS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE VICTORIA GARDENS
CULTURAL CENTER AND AUTHORIZATION TO ACCEPT THESE
FUNDS AND APPROPRIATE THE $500,000 INTO ACCOUNT NUMBER
1205000-4740
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council approve a contract between the County of San
Bernardino and the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the amount of $500,000 in County
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds for the construction of the Victoria
Gardens Cultural Center. In addition, it is recommended that the City Council accept
the funding from the County and appropriate the $500,000 into account number
1205000-4740.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
The San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors, as part of their 2000-2005
Consolidated Plan and the 2003-2004 and 2004-2005 Action Plans, has approved
County CDBG funding in the amount of $500,000 towards the construction of the City's
Victoria Gardens Cultural Center. The City is eligible to receive this funding since
approximately 1,850 square feet of the library (a component of the Cultural Center) will
be set aside for the operation of programs and services (literacy, tutoring and homework
assistance) that benefit primarily Iow-moderate-income residents. As part of the contract
requirements the City will be required to provide the County documentation identifying
the benefit to Iow-and-moderate-income persons for a period of twenty-five years.
City Council
APPROVAL OF A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO AND THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FOR $500,000 IN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
FUNDS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE VICTORIA GARDENS CULTURAL CENTER AND
AUTHORIZATION TO ACCEPT THESE FUNDS AND APPROPRIATE THE $500,000 INTO ACCOUNT
NUMBER 1205000-4740
August 18, 2004
Page 2
FISCAL IMPACT:
Acceptance of the $500,000 in funding from the County of San Bemardino will provide
much needed funding for the construction of the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center.
mitted,
h t~MMSER V~C~unci~&B~ard$~CityC~unci~tStaffRep~t$~2~4~C~untyCDBGC~ntract~u~tura~Center8~ 18. 04. doc
R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
~ NC IN I~ E l~ I N G D E DAD T H E N T
Staff Relmrt
DATE: August 18, 2004
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Erica Darplee, Management Analyst I
SUBJECT: Authorize the execution of a Professional Services Agreement between the
City and Pouk & Steinle, Inc. for operations and maintenance services for the
City's municipal utility substation and distribution system not to exceed
$510,000, to be funded from Account No. 1705-303-5309.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the City Council authorize the execution of a Professional Services
Agreement between the City and Pouk & Steinle, Inc. for operations and maintenance
services for the City's municipal utility substation and distribution system not to exceed
$510,000, to be funded from Account No. 1705-303-5309.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
In response to the unstable energy situation in the State of California, the City of Rancho
Cucamonga on August 31, 2001, authorized the creation and operation of a municipally
owned utility for the purpose of providing various utility services. Subsequently, on August
21, 2002, the Redevelopment Agency authorized the filing of a Wholesale Distribution
Access Tariff (WDAT) Application with Southern California Edison Company (Edison) for
the potential provision of electric service to the Victoria Arbors development area by the
Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility. The construction of the Arbors electrical substation
was completed in February 2004, and the substation has been providing power to the
Victoria Gardens mall and surrounding retail/commercial development areas since June
2004.
The next step in continuing the City's strategy to provide reliable electric service to the
Victoria Arbors area is to initiate daily operations and maintenance services of the City
operational electrical distribution system. The cost of operations and maintenance were
included within the original business model approved by Council on April 16, 2003.
.5?
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH POUK & STEINLE, INC. TO PROVIDE OPERATIONS
AND MAINTENANCE SERVICES TO THE CITY'S ELECTRICAL SUBSTATION AND DISTRIBUTION
SYSTEM
AUGUST 18, 2004
PAGE 2
A Request for Proposals for operations and maintenance services was sent to Pouk &
Steinle, Inc. in June 2004. Staff, per the recommendation of the City's electrical consulting
team, as well as the City's attorneys, advised the utility should seek to retain Pouk &
Steinle, Inc. to serve as the City's operations and maintenance contractors. This is due to
the fact that Pouk & Steinle, Inc. was the firm who built and installed the City's electrical
distribution system, and that contract includes a one-year warranty period within which
Pouk and Steinle, Inc. will repair any warranty issues in the conduit or cabling. In order to
avoid third-party actions that may void this warranty, it is recommended that the City retain
the original construction contractor for all maintenance and repair issues during'~he first
year of operations. Following the first year, the City may increase the scope of its
competitive bid process for contracts covering future years.
The drafting and negotiation of the Professional Services Agreement has now been
completed and is presented to the Council for its approval. This agreement establishes the
terms and conditions of all aspects of the operations and maintenance program for the
municipal utility on a time and equipment basis.
The agreement does not provide for a monthly retainer. The City will only pay for actual
services rendered on a time-and-materials basis and the City will control authorization for
all routine and emergency work. Staff has surveyed other municipal utilities and found that
Pouk and Steinle, Inc. is contracted for operation and maintenances services with the City
of Riverside, City of Anaheim as well as with other local newly formed "Greenfield" electric
utilities.
Payment for services rendered under this contract is contingent upon pre-approved and
requested work orders submitted by Engineering staff, and it should be clear that this
contract in no way represents a "blank check" for the contractor to perform unauthorized
work as a means to reap additional monetary benefits.
This agreement will further ensure the City's electric infrastructure is maintained per
equipment manufacturers suggestions, as well as provide the City with a team of
professionals who are able to promptly respond to emergency calls during urgent
situations. As the mall is about to begin its first year as an extremely viable and significant
asset to the City, it is important to remember that RCMU must operate as a responsive
service provider to ensure that success. In this capacity, it is the responsibility of RCMU to
provide the most reliable and timely technical service, as well as customer service possible
in order to keep its clients happy. Part of that responsibility is securing the best operations
and maintenance contractor possible to ensure customer satisfaction.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH POUK & STEINLE~ INC, TO PROVIDE OPERATIONS
AND MAINTENANCE SERVICES TO THE CITY'S ELECTRICAL SUBSTATION AND DISTRIBUTION
SYSTEM
AUGUST 18, 2004
PAGE 3
It is recommended the City Council authorize the execution of a Professional Services
Agreement between the City and Pouk & Steinle, Inc. for operations and maintenance
services for the City's municipal utility substation and distribution system not to exceed
$510,000, to be funded from Account No. 1705-303-5309.
Respectfully submitted,
Wi~t~ J, O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:DJ:tch
Attachment
R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
COMMUNITY SERVICES
DAT~: Au[lust 18, 2004
TO: Mayor and Members of tho Gi~ Gouncil
dack karo, ~lG~, City Manager
~M: Kevin McArdle, Communi~ So.ices Dire~r
Dave Moore, Recreation Superintendent ~
BY:
~: APPROVAL OF AN AGREEMENT BE~EEN THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONG~FONTANA
YMCA FOR USE OF THE CENTRAL PARK FACILITY
RECOMMENDATION
The Park and Recreation Commission has reviewed the draft agreement concerning
the YMCA and its use of the Central Park Goldy S. Lewis Community Center and is
forwardin[l their recommendation that the City Council approve the attached
agreement and authorize staff to make any non-program substantive changes as
necessary.
BACKGROUND~,NALYSIS
This draft agreement has been reviewed by the City Council at the July 26, 2004
City Council Central Park Workshop. There haven't been any changes to the
proposed agreement since then. Both City staff and YMCA staff are confident that
all relative policy, management and operational issues have been addressed within
this agreement. This agreement applies to those areas that have been designed for
YMCA use and include a teen drop-in room, two meeting rooms for teen activities
and an office/administration area with a staff work room. In addition, YMCA staff will
have access to a staff conference room, staff lounge and staff restrooms. YMCA
staff will also have the ability to request additional rooms for special occasions on a
limited basis. Included within this agreement is an annual fee that will charged to the
YMCA for any direct expenses related to the maintenance of their allocated area and
its utilities.
Although the YMCA's emphasis at Central Park will be teen programming, staff
recognizes that they will plan to provide some programs for other age groups. Staff
CITY COUNCIL
AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND YMCA FOR USE OF CENTRAL
PARK FACILITY
August 18, 2004
Page 2
will continue to meet monthly with the YMCA on general issues and twice yearly to
discuss and confirm program scheduling to insure that program conflicts don't arise.
Community Services Director
Attachment: Draft Facility Use Agreement Between the City of Rancho Cucamonga
and the Rancho Cucamonga/Fontana YMCA
FACILITIES USE AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of the __ day of ,
2004, by and between the YMCA, a California nonprofit agency (hereinafter "YMCA") and the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation (hereinafter "City").
Recitals
(i) YMCA is a nationally recognized community based nonprofit organization
that, through its officers, agents, employees and volunteers, has undertaken to provide
various recreational and educational programs of benefit to the residents of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, and surrounding areas. YMCA has requested City to permit its use of
certain City-owned facilities, on a non-exclusive basis, to assist with and further the provision
of YMCA's programs.
(ii) Subject to the terms and conditions hereof, City desires to permit the
nonexclusive utilization by YMCA of three meeting rooms commonly known as "Bear Flat",
"Grizzly Gulch" and "Teen Lodge", one office and office administrative area, and one
workroom, totaling approximately 3,934 square feet in area, in City's Central Park Center
(sometimes collectively referred to herein as "the Facilities"). Additional space will also be
made available to YMCA, on an as-needed basis, subject to availability, as set forth herein.
(iii) It is the intent of the City and YMCA to make the Facilities available in order
to give the YMCA a physical presence in the City, pending its development of a capital
building project and campaign, and with City's assistance, identification of a suitable location
for a permanent facility. It is the further intent of the City and the YMCA in entering this
Agreement to set forth all terms and conditions applicable to YMCA's use of the Facilities.
Agreement
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between City and YMCA as follows:
1. Specific Provisions
A. Term of Agreement. Unless sooner terminated as provided herein, the
term of this Agreement shall be ten (10) years, commencing upon the opening of City's
Central Park Center ("Center" sometimes herein). Said ten (10) year term shall automatically
renew for a five (5) year term, and said five (5) year term shall thereafter automatically renew
for ten (10) consecutive one (1) year terms. Either City or YMCA may terminate this
Agreement for any or no reason by providing the non-terminating party no less than one
hundred eighty (180) days prior written notice of its intent to terminate. Either party may
immediately terminate upon a breach by the other party remaining uncured after thirty (30)
days' prior written notice. Further, in the event of total or partial destruction of the Center,
this Agreement may be terminated by City without prior notice. City shall have the sole right
to determine and declare that the Center is fully or partially destroyed for purposes of this
termination provision. This Agreement grants only a revocable license to use the Facilities.
Nothing herein shall be deemed to create a leasehold or any other kind of interest, other than
a revocable license.
B. Compensation. City shall bear all costs for and related to the
maintenance and operation of the Center except as may be expressly set forth herein this
Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, it is the intent of the parties that the YMCA will
pay City for all of City's actual costs, including costs of ordinary wear and tear, attributable to
YMCA's use of the Facilities. Based upon a total area of 3,934 square feet to be used by
YMCA pursuant to this Agreement, and the parties' best estimate of actual costs to the City,
YMCA shall pay City the total annual amount of $20,498.00, payable in monthly payments
without demand from City, in the amount of $1,708.00, for so long as YMCA shall have first
priority in scheduling use of the Facilities. Said fee shall not be increased more than five
percent (5%) per year for inflation based upon the percentage of increase in the consumer
price index (all consumers) applicable to the area, over the index in effect on October 1st of
the prior year. It is understood that this amount may also change depending on increases or
decreases in costs to the City in providing such space to YMCA, and the extent to which both
parties agree that YMCA relinquished the use of the Facilities for a period exceeding six (6)
consecutive months and that the City was able to make the Facilities available to another
user or users. City reserves the right to schedule any user in the rooms used by YMCA
when not scheduled by the YMCA. In such event, compensation due to the City shall from
the YMCA will be prorated on a square foot basis to reflect any use by non-YMCA users.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, no increase in monthly payments shall be made
except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice by City to YMCA.
C. Use of Facilities.
1. YMCA may use the Facilities for the provision of its community
programs, as may be coordinated with City's Community Services Department. YMCA
acknowledges and agrees that the Facilities, as described and defined in the Recitals, are
sufficient for YMCA's programming and administrative needs. The parties agree that
YMCA's primary programming emphasis shall be geared toward the teenage population. In
order to avoid conflicts with City programs, YMCA's provision of any other kind of programs
shall require City's prior consent, addressed in the City's semi-annual meetings with the
YMCA and noted in the meeting's minutes. The City and YMCA shall meet semi-annually
prior to May 1st and November 1st of each year to discuss, coordinate and plan programs to
be provided by YMCA for the following calendar year. The parties may agree to concurrently
provide community programs. The City will utilize its best efforts to advertise Central Park's
YMCA programs in City publications and on its cable television channel, consistent with
City's cable channel use policy.
YMCA shall have the use of the Facilities for its programs Monday through
Saturday, 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., and Sundays from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., unless different
hours are approved no less than three (3) days in advance, in writing, by the Central Park
Recreation Supervisor. YMCA's Executive Director and supervisory staff shall have access
to the Facilities twenty-four (24) hours per day, provided there is no disruption of other
permitted users' use. The City shall provide a building security system for the Center.
Electronic entry codes shall be given only to YMCA staff as authorized by the Executive
Director and 2 or 3 key programming volunteers as approved by the City. City staff will
review entry reports each month and provide a copy thereof to the Executive Director upon
request. YMCA shall regularly staff its reception desks during normal program hours as a
means of more fully advertising its programs.
City will install simple identification signs within interior areas of the Facilities.
City shall use its best efforts to include and identify the YMCA on four exterior directional
signs that state in smaller lettering, "YMCA Programs". City shall work with YMCA to provide
temporary room signage and directional signage, acceptable to YMCA, to be installed by
City. City shall install the YMCA logo at areas approved by the City and acceptable to the
YMCA.
YMCA shall be allowed short-term use of other City rooms reserved no more
than sixty (60) days in advance of YMCA's request, at no additional cost, upon the written
approval of the Central Park Recreation Supervisor. Depending upon availability, requests
for such use to occur more than sixty (60) days in advance of YMCA's request will be
accommodated upon payment of all applicable fees in accordance with the City's Fee
Resolution, provided the request is approved by the Central Park Recreation Supervisor.
2. By May 1st and November 1st of each year, YMCA shall submit to City
a written schedule of its proposed use of the Facilities for July through December, and
January through June, respectively. Subject to YMCA's use pursuant to the updated
schedule, as provided below, City shall be entitled to reserve up to thirty (30) days in
advance, and permit, use by others of any of the Facilities at times and on days when YMCA
is not scheduled to use the specific Facility. In furtherance thereof, YMCA shall submit to
City by the 1st of each month, an updated schedule for use of the Facilities for the following
thirty (30) days. Should YMCA request a change in its scheduled use of the Facilities less
than thirty (30) days in advance, the request shall be approved unless the Facility requested
has been reserved for third party use as permitted in this subsection.
3. The following common areas shall be available to YMCA, subject to
City's prior use: staff conference room; staff lounge; and staff bathrooms. Unless otherwise
permitted in writing by the Recreation Supervisor, the staff lounge and bathrooms may be
used by YMCA staff, Monday through Saturday, 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., and Sundays from
8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., so long as City staff are present in the building. The staff conference
room must be reserved in advance. YMCA and its invitees may use parking facilities of the
Central Park Community Senior Center only during YMCA's permitted hours and days of
operation. Use of said parking facilities at any other time is prohibited without the prior
written consent of the Recreation Supervisor.
D. Condition of Facilities.
1. City offers, and YMCA accepts for its use, the Facilities, and all
portions thereof, in "as is" condition, without any warranty, express or implied, whatsoever,
and City hereby disclaims, and YMCA agrees to not assert the existence of, any such
warranties. YMCA shall keep the Facilities in good, safe and suitable condition for the uses
contemplated therein, including the storage, securing and maintenance of equipment not
intended for public use or for rental. No physical alterations to the Facilities of any kind,
including, but not limited to, movement of partitions, improvements, fixture installments or
equipment additions or removals, may be made, authorized or permitted without City's prior
written consent. Permitted alterations, improvements, fixtures installments or equipment
additions or removals undertaken by YMCA must conform to and be in compliance with all
applicable codes, ordinances or laws. YMCA agrees to repair or replace any property of City
that is damaged by YMCA or any of its invitees, excepting damage determined by City to be
attributable to normal wear and tear.
2. City shall provide the Facilities with normal janitorial service nightly
(vacuuming, emptying of trash receptacles, etc.). At all other times, YMCA staff shall
maintain the Facilities in clean and organized condition at all times during its use. Extra
clean-up necessitated by YMCA or the acts of its invitees shall be performed by YMCA. City
shall provide a mutually agreed-upon number of tables and chairs for YMCA's use, and
YMCA shall be solely responsible for setting up tables and chairs for its use, and storing the
same at the end of the day, as required by City. YMCA will lock up all cabinets designated
by City for YMCA's use, including all of its supplies and equipment.
3. Upon termination or expiration of this Agreement, YMCA agrees to
leave the Facilities, and any p.ortion thereof that it may utilize, in the condition the Facilities
are in upon YMCA's commencement of use thereof, absent allowance for normal wear and
tear. YMCA shall either perform any necessary repair or renovation activities which may be
required to return the Facilities to the required condition, or alternatively pay to City, upon
demand by City, the reasonably calculated sums to accomplish such renovation or repair.
E. Utilities; Telephone; Fixtures. In partial consideration of the monthly sum
to be paid to City by YMCA pursuant to this Agreement, City shall provide and pay for all
utilities, except telephone service, including electrical power, water, and, if available, gas.
Cable television service shall be separately contracted and paid for by YMCA.
City shall be responsible for installation of telephones and related equipment,
to be owned by City and used solely by YMCA to conduct YMCA business. YMCA may
request modifications to equipment and/or installations in writing to the Center Coordinator.
Upon the Coordinator's approval of the request, it shall be forwarded to the City's Purchasing
Department for processing. YMCA shall pay for any and all labor and material costs incurred
by the City in complying with any such request, within thidy (30) days of receipt of City's
invoice.
Unless otherwise agreed to in writing, YMCA shall be responsible for monthly
payment of all telephone bills attributable to its telephone use (including use attributable to its
invitees), as reflected in telephone usage reports and invoices that City will provide, monthly,
to YMCA. YMCA is responsible for all costs of replacement of missing, and repair of
damaged, telephone equipment.
City will install standard computer conduit and wiring within the Facilities, with
connection points at mutually agreed upon locations. YMCA shall be responsible for
providing any and all computer equipment for its own use, including the safekeeping of such
equipment.
Any and all equipment, fixtures and materials permitted to be attached or
otherwise affixed to the Facilities by YMCA, in a permanent manner, shall be attached or
affixed in a manner which conforms to all existing City codes or regulations for such
installation, following City's written approval. Any such materials, fixtures or equipment
attached or affixed shall, unless otherwise agreed upon, become the property of City at the
time of such installation.
Any and all equipment, fixtures, personal property, or other items provided by
and utilized on the premises by YMCA, which are of a portable nature shall remain the
property of YMCA and City shall have no responsibility to contribute in any manner to the
repair or replacement of such equipment, unless damaged by City staff.
Within thirty (30) days of the opening date of the Central Park building, City
shall equip the office area of the facilities with partitions, desks, desk chairs and guest chairs
for a reception area. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, YMCA shall
replace or pay the costs of replacement of any worn or damaged chairs or other City-
supplied furnishings upon City's request. Following the first year of this Agreement, YMCA
shall be responsible for the cost of providing additional furnishings beyond those originally
provided by City. Furthermore, YMCA shall be responsible to ensure that all furnishings and
equipment within areas comprising the Facilities are in new or like new condition, and
complimentary to the design of the Facilities. YMCA shall be responsible for providing any
and all necessary office equipment and all equipment necessary to conduct its programs.
F. YMCA shall maintain all portions of the Facilities that it may utilize in safe
and first class condition and, further, shall administer its programs in a safe and first class
manner, in compliance with all applicable federal, state, county and local laws, ordinances,
rules and regulations including, but not limited to, fair labor practices, fire safety regulations,
health and safety regulations, nondiscrimination regulations and building codes.
Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 1.A of this Agreement, YMCA's violation of any
applicable law, policy or regulation, where the same constitutes a threat to the public health,
safety or welfare, or causes the City to be exposed to civil or criminal liability, shall be
grounds for City to immediately suspend, without prior, written notice and without affecting its
right to terminate this Agreement, YMCA's right to use the Facilities unless and until, in the
City's sole discretion, such violation is cured. YMCA shall supervise all YMCA staff and its
invitees, and shall manage and oversee all YMCA programs. City staff shall not be called
upon by YMCA to perform any functions of YMCA staff.
G. Indemnification. YMCA shall indemnify, defend and hold City and City's
Redevelopment Agency, and City's and Agency's elected officials, officers, agents,
employees and volunteers, free and harmless from any and all (i) claims for damages caused
by injury or death to any person, or injury to property, (ii) stop notices and mechanics liens,
and/or (iii) other losses whatsoever, arising out of or proximately caused by the acts or
omissions of YMCA or any of its officers, employees, volunteers, agents or invitees, in
connection with YMCA's use and occupancy of the Facilities and its related operations.
YMCA's obligation to indemnify herein includes payment of all attorneys' fees, experts' costs
and cost of suit as may be incurred by or on behalf of any of the foregoing indemnitees. The
provisions of this indemnity shall not apply to any claims or liabilities solely arising out of or
connected to City's active negligence.
YMCA shall promptly pay all charges for which it may become legally
responsible in connection with its performance of this Agreement, including, but not limited
to, charges for equipment and labor, and YMCA shall indemnify, defend and hold City
harmless from any failure to make any such payments.
YMCA shall promptly report any injuries, criminal acts, suspicious or
threatening behavior of any of its invitees, and any observed hazardous conditions of the
Facilities to the Recreation Supervisor.
H. Insurance. Throughout the term of this Agreement, and unless otherwise
required by City's risk manager, at YMCA's sole cost and expense, YMCA shall keep or
cause to be kept in full fome and effect, for the mutual benefit of City and YMCA,
comprehensive, commercial general liability insurance protecting against claims and liability
for personal injury, death, or property damage arising from YMCA's operation and the use,
occupancy, or disuse of the Facilities, and/or adjoining areas and ways, with such insurance
providing protection of at least One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) for bodily injury or death
to any one person or for any one accident or occurrence, and at least One Million Dollars
($1,000,000.00) for property damage.
All insurance required by express provision of this Agreement shall be carried
only in responsible insurance companies licensed to do business in the State of California.
YMCA agrees that City, City's Redevelopment Agency, and City's and Agency's elected
officials, officers, agents, employees, volunteers and agents shall be named as additional
insured on all such policies. All such policies shall contain language to the effect that: (a)
the insurer waives the right of subrogation against City and Agency, and City's and Agency's
officials, officers, employees, volunteers, agents and representatives, (2) the policies are
primary and noncontributing with any insurance that may be carried by City or Agency, and
(3) such policies shall not be cancelled or materially changed except after thirty (30) day
written notice by insurer to City. YMCA shall furnish City with copies of all such policies, or
certificates and endorsement(s), promptly upon receipt. YMCA may effect for its own
account insurance not required under this Agreement.
I. Limitations on Assi.qnment. No interest in or arising out of this Agreement
may be transferred or assigned, nor may any required performance be subcontracted, in
whole or in part, by YMCA, without the prior written consent of City and any such transfer,
assignment or subcontract made without City's consent shall be void. YMCA shall not permit
use of the Facilities by third parties, without City's prior written consent. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, these third parties must be non-profit, business or private groups having a formal
programming relationship with the YMCA and are using the facility to assist the YMCA to
provide a program for the community and not to promote their own business or financial gain.
Said groups may use the YMCA facilities free of separate charge if agreed to in writing by
both parties.
J. Emer.qency Operation Center. Notwithstanding any other provision in this
Agreement, YMCA acknowledges that the Central Park Center has been designated an
auxiliary emergency operation center for City. At any such time as the City, in its sole
discretion, determines that it requires the use of the Facilities as an emergency center,
YMCA agrees that it shall promptly cease utilization of the Facilities for such time as the City
requires. City shall prorate or offset payments due City from YMCA for use of the Facilities
as a result of such emergency operation use lasting two hours or longer.
2. General Provisions.
A. Notices and Representatives. Any notice required or permitted pursuant
to this Agreement shall be given by personal service or by deposit of the same in the United
States mail, postage prepaid and addressed to the parties as follows:
YMCA: Dianna Lee-Mitchell, YMCA Executive Director
11200 Baseline Road
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701
City: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director
City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Mailed notice shall be deemed served on the third business day following mailing.
B. Amendments. This Agreement may only be amended in writing by a
document signed by both parties hereto.
C. Section Headings. Any section headings in this Agreement have been
provided solely for the convenience of the parties and in no way shall serve, or shall be
construed or interpreted to serve, to altar, amend, limit, or expand the express provisions set
forth in each section. This Agreement shall be construed as if drafted by all parties hereto
and shall not be construed against any single party.
D. Governinq Law. The laws of the State of California shall govern this
Agreement and venue for any action brought to enforce any provision of this Agreement shall
be in the Superior Court of the County of San Bernardino.
E. Permits and Approvals. YMCA shall, at its sole cost and expense, obtain
any and all governmental permits, approvals or concurrences required for the use of the
Facilities. I
F. Nondiscrimination. YMCA agrees that in its performance of this
Agreement and use of the Facilities, it shall not discriminate against any person, including,
but not limited to, any employee, agent, volunteer, or officer of YMCA, or any invitee of
YMCA, on the basis of gender, ancestry, color, marital status, sexual preference, religious
beliefs, or age.
G. Entire Aqreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement
between the parties with respect to YMCA's use of the Facilities. No representation,
promise, or understanding, whether express or implied, that is not set forth herein, shall be
valid, binding or of any force or effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement
as of the date first set forth above.
YMCA
BY:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Mayor William J. Alexander
10
R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
~ N GINI~I~I~INC DI~DAI~T~II~N?
Staff Report
DATE: August 18, 2004
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Jeff Barnes, Parks and Landscape Maintenance Superintendent
SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO EXECUTE CONTRACT RENEWALS (CO 90-145, 89-136, 93-006) WITIt
MARIPOSA ltORTICULTLrRAL ENTERPRISES, INC., OF IRWINDALE, CALIFORNIA,
FOR Tltq~ MAINTENANCE OF CITY PARKS AND LANDSCAPE SITES, IN THE AMOUNT
OF $1,300,800 TO BE FUNDED FROM 1001312-5304 ($7,200), 1001316-5300 ($420,680),
1008316-5300 ($73,870), 1110316-5650/1481110-0 ($4,000), 1110316-5650/1119110-0 ($35,000),
1130303-5300 ($226,883), 1131303-5300 ($74,321), 1132303-5300 ($2,150), 1133303-5300
($302,820), 1134303-5300 ($124,876), 1137303-5300 ($17,000) AND 1140303-5300 ($12,000) FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2004-2005
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve and execute the contract renewals (CO 90-145, 89-136, 93-006)
with Mariposa Horticultural Enterprises, Inc. for the maintenance of city parks and landscape sites, in the amount of
$1,300,800 to be funded from 1001312-5304 ($7,200), 1001316-5300 ($420,680), 1008316-5300 ($73,870),
1110316-5650/1481110-0 ($4,000), 1110316-5650/1119110-0 ($35,000), 1130303-5300 ($226,883), 1131303-5300
($74,321), 1132303-5300 ($2,150), 1133303-5300 ($302,820), 1134303-5300 ($124,876), 1137303-5300 ($17,000)
and 1140303-5300 ($12,000) for Fiscal Year 2004-2005.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The City Council has previously awarded contracts (CO 90-145, 89-136, 93-006) to Mariposa Horticultural
Enterprises, Inc. These maintenance contracts have been renegotiated this year, with a price increase of 4%, based
on the Consumer Price Index for June 2004. The City Attomey has reviewed these contracts and has approved their
renewal. Mariposa is one of two landscape contractors used by the City to maintain various landscape sites citywide.
Landscape maintenance of city parks and landscape sites has been budgeted in the fiscal year 2004-2005 budget.
Updated bonds and insurance certificates have been submitted as per the City requirements.
Resp~lly submitted, '
Will~a,~ ~. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:JB:dlw
'71
[~ A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
ENGINEERING DE PARTt~IENT
Staff?Report
DATE: August 18, 2004
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Jeff Barnes, Parks and Landscape Maintenance Superintendent
SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO EXECUTE A CONTRACT RENEWAL (CO 92-011) WITH TRUGREEN
LANDCARE (FORMERLY GOLDEN BEAR ARBORISTS) OF MONROVIA, CALIFORNIA,
FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF CITY TREES, IN THE AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED
$477,100 TO BE FUNDED FROM 1001316-5300 ($48,690), 1130303-5300 ($184,210), 1131303-
5300 ($1,050), 1133303-5300 ($500), 1134303-5300 ($150), 1136303-5300 ($300), 1137303-5300
($350), 1130303-5310 ($51,300), 1131303-5310 ($62,500), 1133303-5310 ($37,000), 1134303-5310
($13,900), 1136303-5310 ($26,450), 1137303-5310 ($13,650), 1138303-5310 ($20,000), 1139303-
5310 ($2,100), 1140303-5310 ($2,350), 1848303-5310 ($12,600) AS APPROVED IN THE FISCAL
YEAR 2004-2005 BUDGET.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve and execute a contract renewal (CO 92-011) with TruGreen
Landcare (formerly Golden Bear Arborists) of Monrovia, California for thc maintenance of city trees, in the amount
not to exceed $477,100 to be funded fi.om 1001316-5300 ($48,690), 1130303-5300 ($184,210), 1131303-5300
($1,050), 1133303-5300 ($500), 1134303-5300 ($150), 1136303-5300 ($300), 1137303-5300 ($350), 1130303-5310
($51,300), 1131303-5310 ($62,500), 1133303-5310 ($37,000), 1134303-5310 ($13,900), 1136303-5310 ($26,450),
1137303-5310 ($13,650), 1138303-5310 ($20,000), 1139303-5310 ($2,100), 1140303-5310 ($2,350), 1848303-5310
($12,600) as approved in the fiscal year 2004-2005 budget.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The City Council previously awarded a contract (CO 92-01 I) to TruGreen Landcare (formerly Golden Bear
Arborists). This maintenance contract has been renegotiated each year, with no price increase since 1994. This year,
TruGreen has informed staff that they wish to continue service to the City and have requested a price increase of 4%,
based on the June 2004 Consumer Price Index. Tree maintenance has been budgeted in the fiscal year 2004-2005
budget. The City Attorney has reviewed these contracts and has approved their renewal. Updated bonds and
insurance certificates have been submitted as per the City requirements.
Respectfully submitted,
WJO:JB:ju
R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
I~ NCIN~EDIN C DE DAI~T~IE NT
Staff Report
DATE: August 18, 2004
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Jeff Bames, Parks and Landscape Maintenance Superintendent
SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO EXECUTE CONTRACT RENEWALS (CO 90-143, 90-144, 93-041, 93-080, 02-
018) WITH TRUGREEN LANDCARE, OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA, FOR THE
MAINTENANCE OF VARIOUS LANDSCAPE SITES CITYWIDE, IN THE AMOUNT NOT
TO EXCEED $2,350,913 TO BE FUNDED FROM 1110303-5300 ($27,600), 1130303-5300
($368,400), 1131303-5300 ($1,014,993), 1134303-5300 ($319,220), 1135303-5300 ($1,890),
1136303-5300 ($244,100), 1137303-5300 ($245,070), 1138303-5300 ($24,500), 1139303-5300
($19,600), AND 1140303-5300 ($85,540) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2004-2005
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve and execute the contract renewals (CO 90-143, 90-144, 93-041, 93-
080, 02-018) with TruGreen LandCare for the maintenance of city parks and landscape sites, in the amount not to
exceed $2,350,913 to be funded from 1110303-5300 ($27,600), 1130303-5300 ($368,400), 1131303-5300
($1,014,993), 1134303-5300 ($319,220), 1135303-5300 ($1,890), 1136303-5300 ($244,100), 1137303-5300
($245,070), 1138303-5300 ($24,500), 1139303-5300 ($19,600), and 1140303-5300 ($85,540) for Fiscal Year 2004-
2005.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The City Council has previously awarded contracts (CO 90-143, 90~144, 93-041, 93-080, 02-018) to TruGreen
LandCare. These maintenance contracts have been renegotiated this year, with a price increase of 4%, based on the
Consumer Price Index for June 2004. TruGreen is one of two landscape contractors used by the City to maintain
various landscape sites citywide. Landscape maintenance of city parks and landscape sites has been budgeted in the
fiscal year 2004-2005 budget. The City Attorney has reviewed these contracts and has approved their renewal.
Updated bonds and insurance certificates have been submitted as per the City requirements.
Refipe~t ~fully submitted,
City Engineer
WJO:JB:dlw
[~ A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
ENGINEERING DE PART'fEN T
Staff Report
DATE: August 18, 2004
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Jeff Barnes, Parks and Landscape Maintenance Superintendent
SUBJECT: APPROVE RENEWAL OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2004-2005 WITH SOCIAL VOCATIONAL
SERVICES FOR WEEKLY PARK LITTER AND TRASH PICK-UP IN
THE AMOUNT OF $43,500 WITH AN OPTION TO RENEW FOR
ADDITIONAL ONE YEAR PERIODS UPON REVIEW AND
CONFIRMATION OF PRICING AND MUTUAL CONSENT, ALLOWING
YEARLY INCREASES BASED ON THE JUNE CONSUMER PRICE
INDEX (CPI) AND INCREASES FOR ADDITIONAL PARKS, TO BE
FUNDED FROM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT ACCOUNTS
1130303-5300 ($4,800), 1131303-5300 ($14,550), 1134303-5300 ($14,550),
1137303-5300 ($3,600), 1140303-5300 ($3,600) AND GENERAL FUND
ACCOUNT 1001316-5300 ($2,400)
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve renewal of a professional services agreement
for fiscal year 2004-2005 with Social Vocational Services for weekly park litter and trash pick-
up in the amount of $43,500 with an option to renew for additional one year periods upon review
and confirmation of pricing and mutual consent, allowing yearly increases based on the June
Consumer Price Index (CPI) and increases for additional parks, to be funded from Landscape
Maintenance District accounts 1130303-5300 ($4,800), 1131303-5300 ($14,550), 1134303-5300
($14,550), 1137303-5300 ($3,600), 1140303-5300 ($3,600) and general fund account 1001316-
5300 ($2,400).
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Social Vocational Services (SVS) is a non-profit corporation established in 1978. SVS provides
vocational services for persons with disabilities by placing them into community work
environments. SVS is funded by the State of California and currently place their clients with over
200 employers throughout California. SVS programs are specifically designed for individuals
who need assistance in gaining experience, training or social skills necessary for successful
independent work and community integration. SVS participants are challenged by disabilities
which include mental retardation, cerebral palsy, epilepsy, autism, learning disabilities, traumatic
-Tq
brain injuries and other conditions. SVS supports these individuals in leading healthy and
productive lives within the community, helping to enhance their self-esteem and offering the
opportunity for personal growth.
On September 17, 2003, the City Council approved a Professional Services Agreement with
Social Vocational Services (SVS) to perform weekly park litter and trash pickup in 15 City parks
for an initial trial period, with the option to extend the contract dependent on good performance.
It was decided that the daily park clean-up activities then performed by City staff might be a
work activity suited to the SVS clients. This activity requires a good deal of time to accomplish
each day, while only requiring entry level skills to complete the tasks. Those tasks include:
policing the entire park for litter and debris pick-up; emptying trash cans and replacing the can
liners; hosing-off picnic pads and tables; and, raking out the playground sand areas. During the
past year, SVS has successfully fulfilled the goal of providing low-cost, high-quality trash
removal and litter pick up in thesel5 parks. The shift of the litter and debris clean-up to the SVS
crews has freed-up 40-80 hours per week previously spent on these activities by City
Crews, which has enabled our staff to perform more technical maintenance duties. SVS has
filled a niche in our labor resource pool by providing low-cost contract support that fits a specific
need in our recurring maintenance activities.
Due to the overwhelming success of this partnership, staff would like to expand the scope of
services provided by SVS to include one additional park (Day Creek Park) resulting in a total of
16 sites. SVS is not requesting an increase in rates for this fiscal year. Therefore, staff
recommends renewing the Professional Services Agreement with Social Vocational Services.
Funding for this service has been approved in the FY 2004/05 budget.
Respectfully submitted,
~illi, gin J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:JB:dlw
R A N H O C U C A M O N G A
E N G I N E E ~ I N G ~) E P A R T M E N T
St f Repor
DATE: August 18, 2004
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Joe Stofa, Associate Engineer
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A MASTER PLAN TRANSPORTATION FACILITY
REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF
TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT THE INTERSECTION OF BANYAN STREET
AND ETIWANDA AVENUE IN CONNECTION WITH DEVELOPMENT
.OF TRACT 16147, SUBMITTED BY PACIFIC CREST
COMMUNITIES, INC., TO BE FUNDED FROM TRANSPORTATION
REIMBURSEMENT ACCOUNT NO. 11243035650/1026124-0
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving the
Transportation Facility Reimbursement Agreement for construction of Banyan Street
and Etiwanda Avenue traffic signal and authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign
said agreement and to cause same to record.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
As a Condition of Approval of Tract 16147 Pacific Crest Communities, Inc., the
developer, was required to construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Banyan Street
and Etiwanda Avenue.
The above required signal improvements has been completed by the developer and
accepted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
The developer has submitted an itemized statement to the City for reimbursement. The
total cost of the signal was $169,303.00 with Transportation Fee Credit against their
building permits in the amount of $120,000.00. The remaining amount of $49,303.00
has been budgeted in the 2004/05 Transportation Reimbursement Account for said
signal.
%,
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
TR 16147 - PACIFIC CREST COMMUNITIES, LLC.
August 18, 2004
Page 2
Staff has reviewed the statement for construction costs submitted and have confirmed
the amount of $49,303.00 reimbursement to the developer for the installation of a traffic
signal at the intersection of Banyan Street and Etiwanda Avenue.
Copies of the agreement signed by the Developer are available in the City Clerk's office.
Respectfully submitted,
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
ENGINEERING DIVISION
William J. O'Noil
City Engineer
WJO:JS:tch
Attachments
'77
RESOLUTION NO. 2
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING A MASTER PLAN
TRANSPORTATION FACILITY REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT
FOR THE INSTALLATION OF A TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT THE
INTERSECTION OF BANYAN STREET AND ETIWANDA AVENUE
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has for its
consideration a Master Plan Transportation Facility Reimbursement Agreement submitted
by Pacific Crest Communities, Inc., the developer of Tract 16147, for the installation of a
traffic signal at the intersection of Banyan and Etiwanda Avenue; and
WHEREAS, the developer, at developer's expense, has completed the required
improvements; and
WHEREAS; the developer request reimbursement for the portion of the traffic signal
improvements as entitled to per the conditions of his development by means of said
Reimbursement Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, HEREBY RESOLVES that said reimbursement agreement be and
the same is hereby approved and the Mayor is herby authorized to sign said Reimbursement
Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the City Clerk to attest thereto and cause
said agreement to record.
R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
]~ NC I N E E l~ I N G D E PAD TH E N T
DATE: August 18, 2004
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Joe Stofa Jr., Associate Engineer
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT SUPPLEMENT AND
SECURITY FOR TRACT NO. 16370, LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST
CORNER OF CHURCH STREET AND ARBOR LANE SUBMITTED BY
STANDARD PACIFIC / VICTORIA ARBORS LLC.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving the subject
improvement Agreement and Security and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said
agreement.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSI~
Tract No. 16370 (Phased Tract of Tentative Tract No. 15974), located on the northwest corner
of Church Street and Arbor Lane was approved by the Planning Commission on March 7, 2001
for the development of 555 single family lots. Tract No. 16370 allows for the construction of 82
single-family residences.
The Developers, Standard Pacific Corporation / Victoria Arbors, LLC, has submitted an
agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site traffic signal improvement at
the intersection of Arbor Lane and Church Street in the following amounts:
Faithful Performance Bond $115,000.00
Labor and Material Bond $ 57,500.00
Copies of the agreement and securities are available in the City Clerk's Office.
Respectfully submitted,
Wil'lia~ J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:RG:tch
Attachments
RESOLUTION NO. ~ ~/'" ,~, ¢ ~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT SUPPLEMENT AND SECURITY FOR TRACT
NO. 16370
WHEREAS, Tract Map 16370 (Phased Tract of Tentative Tract No. 15974) submitted by
Standard Pacific / Victoria Arbors, LLC and consisting of $2 single family homes located at the
northwest corner of Church Street and Arbor Lane was approved by the Planning Commission
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on March 7, 2001 and is in compliance with the State
Subdivision Map Act and Local Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that Act; and
WHEREAS, Tract Map No. 16370 is the final map of a portion of the division of Land
approved as shown on said Tentative Tract Map No.15974; and
WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final
map by the City Council of said City have now been met by entry into an Improvement
Agreement guaranteed by acceptable Improvement Security by Standard Pacific / Victoria
Arbors, LLC.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security
submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby
authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
and the City Clerk to attest said Tract Map No. 16370 is hereby approved.
R A N H O C U C A M O N G A
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Staff Report
DATE: August 18, 2004
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: wilram d. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Betty Miller, Associate Engineer
SUBJECT: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS,. RELEASE THE FAITHFUL
PERFORMANCE BOND, ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND AND
FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR
TRACT 14497, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF BLUEGRASS
AVENUE SOUTH OF WILSON AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY
STANDARD PACIFIC CORPORATION
RECOMMENDATION:
The required improvements for Tract 14497 have been completed in an
acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said
improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and
authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond and accept a
Maintenance Bond.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
As a condition of approval of completion of Tract 14497, located on the west side
of Bluegrass Avenue south of Wilson Avenue, the applicant was required to
complete street improvements. The improvements have been completed and it
is recommended that the City Council release the existing Faithful Performance
Bond and accept the Maintenance Bond.
Developer: Standard Pacific Corporation
Release: Faithful Performance Bond No. 11133621513 $848,600.00
Accept: Maintenance Bond No. 11133621513-M $84,860.00
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
TRACT 14497 - STANDARD PACIFIC CORPORATION
August 15, 2004
Page 2
Respectfully submitted,
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
ENGINEERING DIVISION
City Engineer
Attachments
WJO:BM:tch
v BOUNOAR"~ OF ANNEXATION
NORTH ~ lqTS
CITY OF I~M: Tract ~
RANCHO CUCAMONGA TIT~E: Rancho Etiwanda
ENGINEERING DIVISION EXHIBIT: Vicinit~ Map
RESOLUTION NO. ~)/'~ "',~ ~'
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING
THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 14497 AND
AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 14497 have
been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the
work is complete.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is
authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San
Bernardino County.
I~ A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Slaff Report
DATE: August 18, 2004
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Cindy Hackett, Associate Engineer
Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: ACCEPT THE ARROW ROUTE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM
HAVEN AVENUE TO MILLIKEN AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. 04-001 AS
COMPLETE, RETAIN THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND AS A
GUARANTEE BOND, RELEASE THE LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND AND
AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION
AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $269,946.94
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council accept the Arrow Route Pavement Rehabilitation
from Haven Avenue to Milliken Avenue, Contract No. 04-001, as complete, authorize the
City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion, retain the Faithful Pedormance Bond as a
Guarantee Bond, authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of
$278,938.00 six months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received
and authorize the release of the retention in the amount of $26,776.90, 35 days after
acceptance. Also, approve the final contract amount of $269,946.94.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and
specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
The Arrow Route Pavement Rehabilitation from Haven Avenue to Milliken Avenue scope of
work consisted of cold planing, removal and replacement of heavy alligatored pavement,
asphalt rubber overlay, adjusting manholes, gas valves and water valves, replacement of
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Re: Accept Arrow Route Pavement Rehabilitation
August 18, 2004
Page 2
damaged traffic signal loops, re-striping, and pavement markings. Pertinent information of
the project is as follows:
> Budgeted Amount: $280,000.00
> Account Number: 11763035650/1373176_0
> Engineer's Estimate: $335,200.00
'~ City Council's Approval to Advertise:November 5, 2003
> Publish dates for local paper: November 11 & 18, 2003
> Bid Opening: November 25, 2003
;~ Contract Award Date: January 7, 2004
> Low Bidder: Silvia Construction, Inc.
> Contract Amount: $278,938.00
;> 10% ~ontingency: $27,893.80
~ Final Contract Amo'unt: $269,946.94
> Difference in Contract Amount: -$8,991.06 (3.22%) (savings)
During the pre-construction meeting, the contractor and staff negotiated at the contractor's
request to reduce the crushed aggregate base by substituting with additional asphalt
concrete. However, because of less asphalt removals during construction, the substitution
did not increase the quantities of asphalt concrete or asphalt rubber hot mix, therefore the
reduction of crushed aggregate base along with other bid quantity differences with
constructed quantities resulted in the net reduction of $8,991.06 to the contract.
Respectfully submitted,
City Engineer
WJO:CH/RO:Is
Attachments
ARROW ROUTE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION
(FROM HAVEN AVENUE TO MU.I.rKEN AVENUE)
.4
\
FO~HILL BL~
CITY OF 'RANCHO CUCAMONGA I
VICINITY MAp· ~
RESOLUTION NO. ~)~/" 2~/7
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE
ARROW ROUTE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM
HAVEN AVENUE TO MILLIKEN AVENUE, CONTRACT NO.
04-001 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
WHEREAS, the Arrow Route Pavement Rehabilitation from Haven
Avenue to Milliken Avenue, Contract No. 04-001, has been completed to the satisfaction
of the City Engineer; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the
work complete.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to
sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino
County.
I~ A C H O C U C A M O N G A
ENGINEERING D E PA R Tl~l E N T
Slaff Report
DATE: August 18, 2004
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Jerry Dyer, Senior Civil Engineer ~]/~1~
Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Teohnician~
SUBJECT: RELEASE OF FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND NO. 6024485 IN THE
AMOUNT OF $453,272.17, FOR THE EAST AVENUE STREET
IMPROVEMENTS FROM BANYAN STREET TO NORTH OF 23RD STREET,
CONTRACT NO. 03-018
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release Faithful
Performance Bond No. 6024485 in the amount of $453,272.17 for the East Avenue Street
Improvements from Banyan Street to North of 23rd Street, Contract No. 03-018.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain
free from defects in materials and workmanship.
Contractor: Vance Corporation
2271 N. Locust Avenue
Rialto, CA 92377
Respectfully subm!tted,
City Engineer
WJO:JAD/RO:Is
Attachments
VICINITY MAP
EAST AVE STREET IMPROVEMENTS
FROM BANYAN ST. TO NORTH OF 23RD ST.
PROJECT
LOCATION
Banyan a~
~,~-~: ~ Route 30
19th ,~ hland Av
Base Li~
Foothil
Rt
8th ~-
Freeway
4th St
EXHIBIT 'A'
[~ A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
Staff Report
DATE: August 18, 2004
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT
SECURITIES AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT FOR
TRACT 16335, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EAST
AVENUE, NORTH OF BASE LINE ROAD, SUBMITTED BY KB
HOME GREATER LOS ANGELES INC., AND RELEASE OF
PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT,
IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND MONUMENTATION CASH
DEPOSIT ACCEPTED BY CITY CQUNCIL ON DECEMBER 3,
2003, FROM APHRCK, LLC
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution (1) accepting
the new Improvement Agreement, Securities and Monumentation Cash Deposit, (2)
releasing the previous Improvement Agreement and Securities and authorizing the
Finance Department to refund the previous Monumentation Cash Deposit, and (3)
authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign and release said agreements.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The map, Improvement Agreement, Securities and Monumentation Cash Deposit for
Tract 16335, located on the east side of East Avenue, north of Base Line Road, was
approved by City Council on December 3, 2003. The Tract Map was recorded on
January 23, 2004.
The property has been purchased by KB Home Greater Los Angeles Inc., who has
submitted an agreement and securities to guarantee the completion of the public
improvements in the following amounts:
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
TRACT 16335- KB HOME GREATER LOS ANGELES INC.
August18,2004
Page 2
Faithful Performance Bond $ 269,400.00
Labor and Material Bond $ 134,700.00
Monumentation Cash Deposit $ 2,870.00
The above mentioned securities shall replace the securities submitted by the
original developer, APHRCK, LLC and accepted by City Council on December 3,
2003. By process of this agreement, KB Home Greater Los Angeles Inc. as the
new developer, has responsibility of the project.
Respectfully submitted,
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:WV:tch
Attachments: Vicinity Map
Resolution
HIGHLAND AVFNUE
VICTORIA STREET
Li,.I
::3 PROJECT
Z
BASE LINE R~
N
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITL~~~~_
~IGINEERING DIVISION
RESOLUTION ~. ~ ~ ¢
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND MONUMENTATION
CASH DEPOSIT FOR TRACT 16335 AND RELEASING THE
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND
MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT PREVIOUSLY ACCEPTED BY
CITY COUNCIL ON DECEMBER 3, 2003
WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California did
consider an Improvement Agreement, related Securities and Monumentafion Cash Deposit,
submitted by KB Home Greater Los Angeles Inc., as developer, for the improvement of public
right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on
the east side of East Avenue, north of Base Line Road and release of the previously approved
Improvement Agreement, Securities and Monumentation Cash Deposit for APHRCK, LLC.
WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and
sufficient Improvement Securities, which are identified in said Improvement Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES that (1) said Improvement Agreement, Improvement
Securities and Monumentation Cash Deposit submitted by KB Home Greater Los Angeles Inc.
are hereby approved, (2) the previously approved Improvement Agreement, Securities and
Monumentation Cash Deposit from APHRCK, LLC are released and (3) the Mayor is hereby
authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
and the City Clerk to attest thereto.
~NG1N E EI~INC DEPA~THI~NT
Repor
DA'I~: August 18, 2004
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
~)M: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Betty Miller, Associate Engineer
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NOS. I AND 2 FOR DRC2002-00018 LOCATED AT
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND ALTA LOMA DRIVE
SUBMITTED BY PANORAMA DEVELOPMENT
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions accepting the subject
agreement and security for DRC2002-00018, ordering the annexation to Landscape
Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 and authorizing
the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
DRC2002-00018, located at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Alta Loma Drive in the
Office/Professional Development District, was approved by the Planning Commission on July
10, 2002, for the conditional use permit.
The Developer, Panorama Development, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee
the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts:
Faithful Performance Bond $37,100.00
Labor and Material Bond $18,550.00
Copies of the agreement and securities are available in the City Clerk's Office.
Respectfully submitted,.
City Engineer
WJO:BM:tch
Attachments
Vicinity Map
N DRC2002-0001~
S
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. APPROVING,
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITIES FOR DRC2002-00018
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has
for its consideration an Improvement Agreement by Panorama Development as developer, for
the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to th~ real property specifically described
therein, and generally located at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Alta Loma Drive;
and
WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said
Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the
development of said real property referred to as DRC2002-00018; and
WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good
and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, as follows:
1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the
Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City
Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and
2. That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient,
subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney.
77
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE
ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I AND STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR DRC2002-00018
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has
previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and
Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State
of California (the "72 Act"), said Landscape Maintenance District 1, Street Lighting Maintenance
District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 (referred to collectively as the
"Maintenance Districts"); and
WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the 72 Act authorize the
annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and
WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of
resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority
protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owner of property within
the territory to be annexed; and
WHEREAS, notwithstanding the such provisions of the 72 Act related to the annexation
of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California
("Article XIIID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy
assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the maintenance Districts on
the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and
WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the
"Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual
assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto
(the "improvements"); and
WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed
forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance
District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and
Waiver"); and
WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have
expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 72 Act to the
annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the
annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and
RESOLUTION
DRC2002-00018- PANORAMA DEVELOPMENT
August 18, 2004
Page 2
WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also
expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 72 Act and/or
Adicle XIIID applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the
Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and
have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed
annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory
to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the
Territory in amount snot to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B hereto.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: The above recitals are all true and correct
SECTION 2: This City Council hereby finds and determines that:
a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not
exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each
such parcel from the Improvements.
b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the
Improvements has been determine in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the
maintenance of the Improvements.
c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed
annual assessments.
SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the
Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from
the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and
orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the
amounts set forth in Exhibit B.
SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including levy of all
assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory.
Exhibit A
Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property
To Be Annexed
The Owners of the Property are:
PARCEL C: GEORGE W. FASCHING AND GERALDINE FASCHING, HUSBAND AND
WIFE AS JOINT TENANTS, AS TO AN UNDIVIDED ~ INTEREST AND TOM ENNIS AND
CAROL ENNIS, HUSBAND AND WIFE, AS JOINT TENANTS, AS TO AN UNDIVIDED
INTEREST, AS TENANTS IN COMMON
PARCEL D: LOS OSOS PLAZA, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
The legal description of the Property is:
PARCELS C AND D OF CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE NO. 531, IN THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
RECORDED JULY 24, 2002 AS DOCUMENT NO. 2002-0384141 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS
OF SAID COUNTY.
The above described parcels are shown on sheet A-2 attached herewith and by this
reference made a part herof.
Exhibit B
To
Description of the District Improvements
Fiscal Year 2004/2005
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (GENERAL CITY):
Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (LMD #1) represents 23.63 acres of landscape area,
41.88 acres of parks and 16.66 acres of community trails that are located at various sites
throughout the City. These sites are not considered to be associated with any one particular
area within the City, but rather benefit the entire City on a broader scale. As such, the
parcels within this district do not represent a distinct district area as do the City's remaining
LMD's. Typically parcels within this district have been annexed upon development
The various sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, paseos,
street trees, entry monuments, community trails and parks. The 41.88 acres of parks
consist of Bear Gulch Park, East and West Beryl Park, Old Town Park, Church Street Park,
Golden Oaks Park and the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center.
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS):
Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD #1) is used to fund the maintenance and/or
installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City.
The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to
benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the
maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district.
The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic
signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets
dedicated to the City.
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (LOCAL STREETS):
Street Light Maintenaoce District No. 2 (SLD #2) is used to fund the maintenance and/or
installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets throughout the City but
excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally, this area
encompasses the residential area of the City west of Haven Avenue. It has been
determined that the facilities in this district benefit this area of the City.
This sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals
(or a portion thereof) on local streets generally west of Haven Avenue.
Exhibit "B" continued
Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2004/2005)
For Project: DRC2002-00018
Number of Lamps
Street Lights 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L
SLMD # 1 4* - ...........
SLMD # 2 ...... 1 ......
Community Trail Turf Non-Turf Trees
Landscaping DGSF SF SF EA
LMD # 1 ---
*Existing items installed with Alta Loma Drive, by California Department of Transportation
Assessment Units by District
Parcel Acres SLMD1 SLMD2 LMD1
"C" 1.09 2.18 2.18 1.09
"D" 1.62 3.24 3.24 1.62
Exhibit C
Proposed Annual Assessment
Fiscal Year 2004/2005
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 (GENERAL CITY):
The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $92.21 for the fiscal year 2004/05. The following table
summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. I (General City):
# of Physical # of Rate Per
Units Assessment Assessment Assessment
Land Use Type Units Factor Units Unit Revenue
Single
Family Parcel 7699 1.0 7951 $92.21 $733,161.71
Multi-Family Units 7091 0.5 3570 $92.21 $329,189.70
Comm/Ind. Acre 2 1.0 2 $92.21 $184.42
TOTAL $1,062,535.83
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (DRC2002-00018) is:
Parcel C: 1.09 Acres x 1.0 A.U. Factor x $92.21 Rate Per A.U. = $100.51 Annual Assessment
Parcel D: 1.62 Acres x 1.0 A.U. Factor x $92.21 Rate Per A.U. = $149.38 Annual Assessment
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS):
The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2004/05. The following table
summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets):
# of # of Rate Per
Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue
Single
Family Parcel 21,151 1.00 21,151 $17.77 $375,853.27
Multi-Family Unit 8,540 1.00 8,540 $17.77 $151,755.80
Commercial Acre 2,380.36 2.00 4,760.72 $17.77 $84,597.99
TOTAL $612,207.06
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (DRC2002-00018) is:
Parcel C: 1.09 Acres x 2.0 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $38.74 Annual Assessment
Parcel D: 1.62 Acres x 2.0 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $57.57 Annual Assessment
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (LOCAL STREETS):
The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $39.97 for the fiscal year 2004/05. The following table
summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets):
# of # of Rate Per
Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue
Single
Family Parcel 6050 1.00 6050 $39.97 $241,818.50
Multi Family Unit 24 1.00 919 $39.97 $36,732.43
Commercial Acre 19.05 2.00 19.05 $39.97 $1,522.86
Total $280,073.79
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (DRC2002-00018) is:
Parcel C: 1.09 Acres x 2.0 A.U. Factor x $39.97 Rate Per A.U. = $87.13 Annual Assessment
Parcel D: 1.62 Acres x 2.0 A.U. Factor x $39.97 Rate Per A.U. = $129.50 Annual Assessment
R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
E~GINEERING DEPARTMENT
Staff Report
DATE: August 18, 2004
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Cindy Hackett, Associate Engineer (~
Richard Oaxaca, Engineering TechniciEn~
SUBJECT: ACCEPT THE BERYL COMMUNITY TRAIL FROM HILLSIDE ROAD TO
NORTH OF ALMOND STREET, CONTRACT NO. 04-022 AS COMPLETE,
RETAIN THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND AS A GUARANTEE
BOND, RELEASE THE LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND AND AUTHORIZE
THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND
APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $80,550.29
RECOMMENDATION
it is recommended that the City Council accept the Beryl Community Trail from Hillside
Road to North of Almond Street, Contract No. 04-022, as complete, authorize the City
Engineer to file a Notice of Completion, retain the Faithful Performance Bond as a
Guarantee Bond, authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of
$74,236.21 six months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received
and authorize the release of the retention in the amount of $3,711.81, 35 days after
acceptance. Also, approve the final contract amount of $80,550.29.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and
specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
The Beryl Community Trail from Hillside Road to North of Almond Street scope of work
consisted of construction of community trail including retaining curb, trail run-off deflector,
adjustment of existing utilities to new grade, and the installation of a PVC rail fence.
Pertinent information of the project is as follows:
~ Budgeted Amount: $200,000.00
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Re: Accept Bell Community Trail Proje~
August18,2004
Page 2
> Account Numbers: 11103035650/1436110-0
~ Engineer's Estimate: $98,650.00
> City Council's Approval 1o Advedise: February 4, 2004
~ Publish dates for local paper: February 10 & 24, 2004
> Bid Opening: March 2, 2004
> Contract Award Date: April 7, 2004
> Low Bidder: Dye and Browning Construction, Inc.
> Contract Amount: $74,236.21
~' 10% Contingency: $7,423.62
> Final Contract Amount: $80,550.29
~' Difference in Contract Amount: $6,314.08 (8.51%)
The net increase in the total cost of the project is a result of actual contract bid item
quantities that are above the estimated quantities. Notable overages were an increase in
the installation of PVC 2-rail fencing that was added and during removals large rocks were
encountered which resulted in additional decomposed granite material needing to be
placed to fill voids created by the removal of said large rocks.
Respectfully submitted,
VV~a~m J. O Neil
City Engineer
WJO:CH/RO:Is
Attachments
/07
BERYL COMMUNITY TRAIL
(FROM HTr.T..~IDE ROAD TO NORTH OF ~L~0ND STREET)
24TH ST
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE
BERYL COMMUNITY TRAIL FROM HILLSIDE ROAD TO
NORTH OF ALMOND STREET, CONTRACT NO. 04-022
AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
WHEREAS, the Beryl Community Trail from Hillside Road to North of
Almond Street, Contract No. 04-022, has been completed to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the
work complete.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to
sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino
County.
ORDINANCE NO. 731 c
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING
REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO VEHICULAR CRUISING,
AND AMENDING THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL
CODE.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby ordains as follows:
SECTION 1: Title 10 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby
amended by the addition of a new Chapter 10.72 to read as
follows:
"Chapter 10.72
"CRUISING PROHIBITED
Sections:
10.72.010 Cruising prohibited.
10.72,020 Definitions.
10.72.030 Establishment of traffic control points.
10.72,040 Issuance of warning notices.
10.72.050 Exceptions.
10.72.010. Cruising prohibited. No person shall engage in, or permit
any vehicle registered to such person to engage in, cruising in any
cruising control area. A violation of this Chapter is an infraction and shall
be punishable as specified in Chapter 1.12 of this Code, or any successor
provision thereto.
10.72.020. Definitions. For purposes of this Chapter, the following
definitions shall apply:
A. 'Cruising' shall mean the repetitive driving of a motor vehicle past a
traffic control point in traffic that is congested at or near the traffic
control point, as determined by the ranking peace officer on duty
within the affected area, within a specified time period and after the
vehicle operator has been issued a warning notice that further driving
past the control point will be a violation of this Chapter. A vehicle
shall be deemed to be in violation of this Chapter each time it passes
a traffic control point prior to the designated permissible return time.
Each such violation shall constitute a separate violation and no
additional warning notice shall be required before issuance of
subsequent citations may occur.
B. 'Cruising control area' shall mean an area subject to cruising controls,
clearly identified by signs at the beginning and end of the area that
briefly and clearly state the appropriate provisions of California
Vehicle Code § 21 lO0(k) and the provisions of this Chapter.
/iD
C. 'Traffic control point' shall mean a location within a cruising control
area that is designated by the ranking peace officer on duty within the
area, as a reference point for purposes of determining if a vehicle has
engaged in cruising.
10.72.030. Establishment of traffic control points. The ranking peace
officer on duty within any cruising control area may, upon determining that
such area is adversely impacted by traffic congestion, establish and
maintain one or more traffic control points for such area.
10.72.040. Issuance of warning notices. Any peace officer may issue
a written warning notice to a driver and/or to each occupant legally
capable of driving a motor vehicle, who is identified by such officer as
having passed a particular traffic control point two or more times within a
four-hour period, or such other period as determined to be appropriate by
the ranking peace officer on duty within a cruising control area. The
warning notice shall identify the street on which one or more traffic control
points are located and shall generally state that further driving past the
same traffic control point prior to the time specified therein shall constitute
a violation of Chapter 10.72 of this Code and shall be punishable by a
fine.
10.72.050. Exceptions. This section shall not apply to the following:
A. Authorized emergency vehicles as defined in California Vehicle Code
§ 165.
B. Vehicles owned by a public entity or public utility.
C. Vehicles licensed for public transportation.
D. Commercial vehicles while being driven for business purposes.
E. Vehicles used to drop off or pick up any person whose residence or
place of employment is located within a cruising control area provided,
however, that such person must be able to present satisfactory proof
of residence or employment to a peace officer at a traffic control point
within such cruising control area."
SECTION2: Severability. The City Council declares that, should any
provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance
be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court
of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive
legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs,
sentences and words of this Ordinance shall remain in full force
and effect.
SECTION 3: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance.
ORDINANCE NO. 732
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FINDING AND
DECLARING THAT DESIGNATED PRIVATE ROADS TO
VICTORIA GARDENS, AND PARKING STRUCTURES
THEREIN, SHALL BE SUBJECT TO SPECIFIC PROVISIONS
OF THE CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE.
A. RECITALS.
(i) California Vehicle Code § 21107.6 authorizes the City, by ordinance, to make
provisions of the California Vehicle Code applicable to private roads that
serve commercial establishments, following a public hearing and prior written
notice to the owner of such road.
(ii) California Vehicle Code § 21107.8 authorizes the City, by ordinance or
resolution, to make specified provisions of the California Vehicle Code
applicable to privately owned and maintained off-street parking facilities
following a public hearing and prior written notice to the owner and operator
of any such off-street parking facility.
(iii) In accordance with the authorities referred to in Recitals (i) and (ii), above,
the City Council desires to make provisions of the California Vehicle Code
applicable to certain private roads and off-street parking facilities serving
Victoria Gardens, a private commercial establishment, as specified in this
Ordinance.
(iv) On August 4, 2004, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing
concerning the adoption of this Ordinance. Prior written notice was provided
to the owner(s) of the affected private roads, and owner(s) and operator(s) of
the affected off-street parking facilities, as required by law.
(v) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.
B. ORDINANCE.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
ordains as follows:
SECTION 1: All facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true
and correct.
SECTION 2: Upon the effective date of this Ordinance, all provisions of the
California Vehicle Code shall be applicable to those private roads
serving Victoria Gardens, as are depicted in Exhibit "A" attached
hereto and incorporated by reference herein.
SECTION 3: Upon the effective date of this Ordinance, §§ 22350, 23103, and
23109, and the provisions of Division 16.5 (commencing with §
38000), of the California Vehicle Code shall apply to those
privately owned and maintained off-street parking facilities serving
Victoria Gardens, as are depicted in Exhibit "A" attached hereto.
SECTION 4: The provisions of this Ordinance shall not become effective as to
privately maintained off-street parking facilities unless and until a
sign has been posted in a conspicuous place at each entrance to
each affected parking facility, that is not less than 17 x 22 inches
in size, with lettering not less than one inch in height, stating, in
effect, that the off-street parking facility is subject to public traffic-
regulations and control.
SECTION 5: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance.
Victoria Gardens Site Plan Rancho Cucamonga, California
Illustrative Site Plan ' ;-,":, 6 ~ ^p~i, 2003
Victoria Gardens-C. LLC .~ ci o,.a~choC~o.g. ~ I~:''"':':?°'~ .... ~
R A N C H O C U C A ivl O N G A
]~ [Il L D I N C AND ~AI~E TY
DATE: August 11,2004
TO: Mayor and Members of City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Trang Huynh, Building and Safety Official /'~ ~'"'"'~.-v
BY:
Mark D. Salazar, Code Enforcement Supervisor)r/l/~
CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE TO ~EVISE REGULATIONS
PERTAINING TO NUISANCE ABATEMENT, AMENDING TITLE 8 OF
THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE, AND DECLARING
THE URGENCY THEREOF RELATED TO STAGNANT WATER.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached Ordinance prohibiting the
condition of stagnant water located at properties in the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS
On June 25, 2004, West Valley Mosquito and Vector Control District issued a Press Release
advising that 101 dead birds tested positive for West Nile Virus during the week of June 8th,
2004 as reported by the California Department of Health Services. Of those reported during
that week, 16 were located within the City limits of Rancho Cucamonga. At that time, eight (8)
human cases tested positive for the West Nile Virus in San Bernardino County.
On July 2, 2004, West Valley Mosquito and Vector Control District issued a Press Release
advising that 10 more dead birds tested positive for West Nile Virus within the City limits of
Rancho Cucamonga. As of that date in 2004, 12 mosquito pools have been tested positive for
West Nile Virus in the West Valley District. Additionally, five (5) horses have been euthanized in
the Sate of California, as there is no current vaccination for this virus.
Most people who become infected with West Nile Virus do not experience symptoms or become
ill. About one out of every 150 people infected with West Nile Virus may develop a more severe
form of the illness and adults over 55 years of age are at an increased risk of serious
complications from West Nile Virus infection.
As of today, two human deaths have been confirmed to be associated with West Nile Virus in
San Bernardino and Orange Counties.
//5
The West Valley Mosquito and Vector Control District (WVMVCD) is requesting that
precautionary steps are taken by communities in their district, which includes Rancho
Cucamonga, to help contain the continued spread of the West Nile Virus. These steps include:
· Removing standing water.
· Regularly clean pools, spas, ponds, and fountains, and keep the pumps functioning
properly to prevent mosquito breeding.
· Report mosquito problems, standing water sources, and nonfunctional pools, spas or
ponds to the District.
In keeping with the standards to reduce the opportunity for continued mosquito breeding within
the City limits of Rancho Cucamonga, staff researched current adopted codes by the City and
found inadequate support to properly address and abate the problem of what is commonly
referred to as "green pools". "Green pools" are swimming pools or ponds or similar water areas
which have been neglected by regular use and proper filtering maintenance. Algae and other
harmful bacteria can build in these areas, that were once used for recreation and personal
enjoyment, turning the appearance of the water color to a green or black and now allowing for
and inviting the breeding of mosquito and their larva. Numerous green pools have been
identified in Rancho Cucamonga by the recent aerial survey conducted by WVMVCD.
The Building Inspectors and Code Enforcement Staff have worked hand-in-hand with the West
Valley Mosquito and Vector Control District to both educate the public and encourage the
removal of "green pool" occurrences. Generally, staff receives voluntary compliance from the
public. The current code sections that staff may apply to "green pools" do not adequately cover
the nature of "green pools" and were not fully intended to address the filtration of "green pools".
Therefore, staff is recommending to Members of the City Council to adopt the attached
Ordinance which requires the abatement of "green pool" situations and the enforcement
mechanism for this mosquito breeding problem related to "green pools".
Respectfully su~bm, itted, /~
Building and Safety Official
-2-
ORDINANCE NO. -- ~-7-~~
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REVISING REGULATIONS
PERTAINING TO NUISANCE ABATEMENT, AMENDING TITLE
8 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE, AND
DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby ordains as follows:
Section 1. Section 8.23.060 of Chapter 8.23 of Title 8 (Nuisance Abatement) of thc
Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is bereby amended by adding a new subsection "W'
to read as follows:
"H. The presence of standing water in any swimming pool, spa, hot tub,
pond, bird bath, excavation or any other place, thing or location that is in an
unhealthy, stagnant, or otherwise unsafe condition due to neglect, lack of
maintenance, or insufficient or improper treatment or filtration. For purposes of
this subsection, standing water that is deemed to be unhealthy and a nuisance
includes, but is not limited to, standing water found to contain or be likely to
attract, unhealthy vegetation, mosquito larvae or other harmful insects, bacteria,
pathogens or disease."
Section 2. Penalties.
It shall be unlawful for any person, firm, partnership, or corporation to violate any
provision or to fail to comply with any of the requirements of this Ordinance hereby
adopted. Any person, firm, partnership or corporation violating any provisions of this
Ordinance or failing to comply with any of the requirements thereof shall be deemed
guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be punished by a fine not
exceeding one thousand dollars ($1,000.00), or by imprisonment not exceeding six
(6)months, or by both such fine and imprisonment. Each and every person, firm,
partnership, or corporation shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and
every day or any portion thereof during which any violation of any of the provisions of
this Ordinance is committed, continued or permitted by such person, firm, partnership or
corporation, and shall be deemed punishable therefor as provided in this Ordinance.
Section 3. Civil Remedies Available.
The violation of any of the provisions of this Ordinance shall constitute a nuisance and
may be abated by the City through civil process by means of restraining order,
preliminary or permanent injunction or in any other manner provided by law for the
abatement of such nuisances.
Section 4. Severability.
The City Council declares that, should any article, provision, section, paragraph, sentence
or word of this Ordinance hereby adopted be or declared invalid by any final court action
11'7
in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislative, the
remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences and words of this Ordinance hereby
adopted shall remain in full force and effect.
Section 5. Urgency and Effective Date.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga finds and declares that there is an
immediate risk to the public health caused by the confirmed presence in southern
California of the West Nile virus, known to be spread by mosquitoes. The City Council
further finds and declares that the presence of standing water and the opportunity it
presents for disease-carrying mosquitoes to breed and proliferate, significantly
contributes to the spread of the virus. Based thereon, the City Council hereby finds and
declares that it is necessary that this Ordinance take effect immediately in order to fully
protect and preserve the public health and safety.
Section 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall
cause the same to be published in the manner prescribed by law.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of ., 2004
William J. Alexander, Mayor
I, Debbie Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify
that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of ,2004, and was
finally passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
held on the __ day of ,2004, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ATTEST:
City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
I~ a N C H 0 C U C a m 0 N G ^
COM~IJNIT¥ ~ I~ l~Vl CI~ &
S~tf~ g~I't **Revised Staff Report**
DATE: August 18, 2004
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director
BY: Bill Pallotto, Recreation Supervisor
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REVISING
REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO POSSESSION AND CONSUMPTION
OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES WITHIN CITY PARKS, AND AMENDING
TITLE 12 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached Ordinance revising
regulations pertaining to possession and consumption of alcoholic beverages within City
parks, and amending Title 12 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code in order to
permit the serving of alcoholic beverages in the Senior and Community Center at
Central Park under designated conditions.
BACKGROUND~,NALYSIS
Attached is a copy of an Ordinance that would amend regulations relating to the
consumption of alcoholic beverages in City parks for consideration by the City Council.
This Ordinance was reviewed and discussed by City Council at the July 26, 2004 City
Council Central Park Workshop. As discussed at the Workshop, city staff continues to
receive a tremendous number of requests for rental of large multi-purpose rooms that
allow consumption of alcoholic beverages. In order to help meet this significant public
demand, staff is therefore recommending the use of Central Park Multi-Purpose Rooms
and surrounding areas (Rancho Cucamonga Hall, David Dreier Hall and the Mesa
Courtyard and the lobby area adjacent to these areas only) to allow the consumption of
beer, wine and champagne only at approved functions and under strict conditions.
~APPR~VAL TO AMEND THE ALCOHOL ORDINANCE AT CENTRAL PARK
August 18, 2004
Page 2
At the July 26 City Council Workshop relating to Central Park, the City Council
discussed the pros and cons associated with the possibility of allowing alcoholic
beverages at Central Park. Individual City Councilmembers conveyed various opinions
with regards to this proposed policy change and took no action at the Workshop
regarding the Ordinance. The City Council did direct staff to meet with local caterers to
bring them up to date on plans for Central Park, particularly plans for room rentals,
catering policies and alcoholic beverage regulations. Staff invited all local caterers to a
meeting held on Thursday, August 5. Six catering businesses were represented at the
meeting as well as the Executive Director of the Chamber of Commerce. As a result of
this meeting, the local caterers are now current on plans for Central Park and are
looking forward to the catering opportunities that will be presented at the new facility.
Staff is making the final edits to the administrative policies and procedures that will
govern the serving of beer, wine and champagne in the Central Park facility. A draft of
these policies and procedures was also reviewed by the City Council at the July 26
Workshop. These items will be presented to the City Council for approval at an
upcoming City Council meeting, simultaneous with second reading of this Ordinance.
Respe~ ~ully .su~pp]j~ted,
Comm ~nity Services Director
Attachment: Amended Alcohol Ordinance
ORDINANCE NO. ~
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REVISING REGULATIONS
PERTAINING TO POSSESSION AND CONSUMPTION OF
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES WITHIN CITY PARKS, AND
AMENDING TITLE 12 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MUNICIPAL CODE
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby ordains as follows:
Section 1. Subsection "B" of Section 12.04.010 of Chapter 12.04 of Title'12
of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
"B.1. Possess an open container of an alcoholic beverage or consume any
alcoholic beverage, except as follows:
a. Beer and wine that is sold within the interior of the stadium
building located in the sports complex on the west side of Rocbester
Avenue, south of Foothill Boulevard.
b. In the following areas of the James L. Brulte Senior Center
and Goldy S. Lewis Community Center in Central Park: the David Dreier
Hall, the Rancho Cucamonga Hall, the Mesa Courtyard, and in any lobby
and patio area immediately adjacent to these areas, during City-permitted
or operated functions, so long as City- required insurance and security is
provided, and, if required by State law, an ABC liquor license is first
obtained and proof thereof provided to the City.
c. Within any other areas in City parks specifically permitted
City Council resolution, or otherwise by law.
2. The City Manager shall cause signs to be posted as follows:
a. Subject to the provisions of subsections b and c, below, at
each entrance to each City park, a sign substantially stating, as follows:
'Possession or consumption of alcoholic beverages in City parks is
prohibited - R.C.M.C. § 12.04.010'
b. At the entrance to the Sports Complex located on the west
side of Rochester Avenue, south of Foothill Boulevard, a sign
substantially stating, as follows:
'Except for the possession or consumption of beer or wine sold
within the stadium building located on these premises, possession
78S367-1
or consumption of alcoholic beverages in City parks is prohibited -
R.C.M.C. §12.04.010'
c. At the entrance to Central Park, a sign substantially stating,
as follows:
'Possession or consumption of alcoholic beverages is prohi6ited in
this park except where posted otherwise within the James L. Bmlte
Senior Center and Goldy $. Lewis Community Center - R.C.M.C.
§12.04.010'
3. For the purpose of this Chapter, the term 'alcoholic beverage' or
'alcoholic beverages' shall have the meaning set forth in Section 23044 of
the California Business and Professions Code, or any successor provision
thereto. The term 'open container of an alcoholic beverage' shall mean
any can, bottle or other receptacle containing any alcoholic beverage that
has been opened, or a seal broken, or the contents of which have been
partially removed."
Section 2. Penalties.
Any person, firm, partnership or corporation violating any provision of
this Ordinance or the Section hereby adopted, or failing to comply with
any of the requirements thereof, is guilty of an infraction, and upon
conviction thereof, shall be punished by a fine not exceeding one
hundred dollars ($100) for a first violation; by a fine not exceeding two
hundred dollars ($200) for a second violation of the same provision
within one (1) year; and by a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars
($500) for each additional violation of the same provision within one (1)
year.
Section 3. Severability.
The City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph,
sentence, or word of this Ordinance or the Section hereby adopted be rendered or
declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or
by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections,
paragraphs, sentences and words of this Ordinance and said Section shall remain
in full force and effect.
785367-1 i ~,~ ,~
Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and
shall cause the same to be published in the manner prescribed by law.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of ,2004.
Mayor
I, Debbie Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby
cetiify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting.of the
City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of
,2004, and was finally passed at a regular meeting of the City
Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the __ day of
,2004, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
AB SENT: COUNCIl.MEMBERS:
ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ATTEST:
City Clerk of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga
I:\COMMSERV~CENTRAL PARK PROJECT~2004~Alcohol Ol~lln~nc8 Amemtment.7.29.04.DO C
R A N C H O C u C A M O N G A
DATE: August 18, 2004
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Dilect~/~1
BY: Bill Pallotto, Recreation Supervisor
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REVISING
REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO POSSESSION AND CONSUMPTION
OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES WITHIN CITY PARKS, AND AMENDING
TITLE 12 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached Ordinance revising
regulations pertaining to possession and consumption of alcoholic beverages within City
parks, and amending Title 12 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code in order to
permit the serving of alcoholic beverages in the Senior and Community Center at
Central Park under designated conditions.
BACKGROUND~,NALYSIS
Attached is a copy of an Ordinance that would amend regulations relating to the
consumption of alcoholic beverages in City parks for consideration by the City Council.
This Ordinance was reviewed and discussed by City Council at the July 26, 2004 City
Council Central Park Workshop. As discussed at the Workshop, city staff continues to
receive a tremendous number of requests for rental of large multi-purpose rooms that
allow consumption of alcoholic beverages. In order to help meet this significant public
demand, staff is therefore recommending the use of Central Park Multi-Purpose Rooms
and surrounding areas (Rancho Cucamonga Hall, David Dreier Hall and the Mesa
Courtyard and the lobby area adjacent to these areas only) to allow the consumption of
beer, wine and champagne only at approved functions and under strict conditions.
APPROVAL TO AMEND THE ALCOHOL ORDINANCE AT CENTRAL PARK
August 18, 2004
Page 2
At the July 26 City Council Workshop relating to Central Park, the Council expressed
their support of this Ordinance and directed staff to meet with local caterers to bring
them up to date on plans for Central Park, particularly plans for room rentals, catering
policies and alcoholic beverage regulations. Staff invited all local caterers to a meeting
held on Thursday, August 5. Six catering businesses were represented at the meeting
as well as the Executive Director of the Chamber of Commerce. As a result of this
meeting, the local caterers are now current on plans for Central Park and are looking
forward to the catering opportunities that will be presented at the new facility.
Staff is making the final edits to the administrative policies and procedures that will
govern the serving of beer, wine and champagne in the Central Park facility. A draft of
these policies and procedures was also reviewed by the City Council at the July 26
Workshop. These items will be presented to the City Council for approval at an
upcoming City Council meeting, simultaneous with second reading of this Ordinance.
Attachment: Amended Alcohol Ordinance
ORDINANCE NO. ~ ~/
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REVISING REGULATIONS
PERTAINING TO POSSESSION AND CONSUMPTION OF
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES WITHIN CITY PARKS, AND
AMENDING TITLE 12 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MUNICIPAL CODE
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby ordains as follows:
Section 1. Subsection "B" of Section 12.04.010 of Chapter 12.04 of Title 12
of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
"B.1. Possess an open container of an alcoholic beverage or consume any
alcoholic beverage, except as follows:
a. Beer and wine that is sold within the interior of the stadium
building located in the sports complex on the west side of Rochester
Avenue, south of Foothill Boulevard.
b. In the following areas of the James L. Brulte Senior Center
and Goldy S. Lewis Community Center in Central Park: the David Dreier
Hall, the Rancho Cucamonga Hall, the Mesa Courtyard, and in any lobby
and patio area immediately adjacent to these areas, during City-permitted
or operated functions, so long as City- required insurance and security is
provided, and, if required by State law, an ABC liquor license is first
obtained and proof thereof provided to the City.
c. Within any other areas in City parks specifically permitted
City Council resolution, or otherwise by law.
2. The City Manager shall cause signs to be posted as follows:
a. Subject to the provisions of subsections b and c, below, at
each entrance to each City park, a sign substantially stating, as follows:
'Possession or consumption of alcoholic beverages in City parks is
prohibited - R.C.M.C. §12.04.010'
b. At the entrance to the Sports Complex located on the west
side of Rochester Avenue, south of Foothill Boulevard, a sign
substantially stating, as follows:
'Except for the possession or consumption of beer or wine sold
within the stadium building located on these premises, possession
785367-1 ]2/
or consumption of alcoholic beverages in City parks is prohibited -
R.C.M.C. §12.04.010'
c. At the entrance to Central Park, a sign substantially stating,
as follows:
'Possession or consumption of alcoholic beverages is prohibited in
this park except where posted otherwise within the James L. Bmlte
Senior Center and Goldy S. Lewis Community Center - R.C.M.C.
§12.04.010'
3. For the purpose of this Chapter, the term 'alcoholic beverage' or
'alcoholic beverages' shall have the meaning set forth in Section 23044 of
the California Business and Professions Code, or any successor provision
thereto. The term 'open container of an alcoholic beverage' shall mean
any can, bottle or other receptacle containing any alcoholic beverage that
has been opened, or a seal broken, or the contents of which have been
partially removed."
Section 2. Penalties.
Any person, firm, partnership or corporation violating any provision of
this Ordinance or the Section hereby adopted, or failing to comply with
any of the requirements thereof, is guilty of an infraction, and upon
conviction thereof, shall be punished by a fine not exceeding one
hundred dollars ($100) for a first violation; by a fine not exceeding two
hundred dollars ($200) for a second violation of the same provision
within one (1) year; and by a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars
($500) for each additional violation of the same provision within one (1)
year.
Section 3. Severability.
The City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph,
sentence, or word of this Ordinance or the Section hereby adopted be rendered or
declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or
by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections,
paragraphs, sentences and words of this Ordinance and said Section shall remain
in full fome and effect.
785367-1 I~
Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and
shall cause the same to be published in the manner prescribed by law.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this __ day of ,2004.
Mayor
I, Debbie Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the
City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of
,2004, and was finally passed at a regular meeting of the City
Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the __ day of
,2004, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ATTEST:
City Clerk of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga
I:\COMMSERV~CENTRAL PARK PROJ~CT~200~Alcohol Ordinance Amendment.7.29.04.DO C
785367-1
TH E C I T Y OF
I~ANCi1 0 CUCAH ONCA
SbffReport
DATE: August 18, 2004
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL OF HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW
DRC2003-00961 - LYNN AND RENEE MASSEY - The appeal of the Planning
Commission decision to approve a single-family residence in the Low Residential
District, located at 8045 Camino Predera, Lot 12 of Tract 10035, as proposed by
Mike and Wendy Stachowiak - APN: 0207-631-02.
ACTION: Upon Council review of the modified plans as submitted on August 9, 2004, by the
applicant and agreed to by the appellant, it would be appropriate if the City Council agrees, to
approve the attached resolution upholding the action of the Planning Commission thereby
approving Hillside Development Review DRC2003-00961, subject to the new redesign as
submitted August 9, 2004, and conditioned with this resolution.
The resolution reversing the action of the Planning Commission and denying the application for
the hillside development review has also been included with this report since it was the last
requested action before the City Council on July 21, 2004.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: This item was previously reviewed by the City Council on July 7
and July 21, 2004. At the July 21, 2004 meeting, the City Council continued the matter for 30
days in order to allow time for the applicant to work with the appellant and the neighbors on
some options for redesigning their home. Staff joined the applicant and the neighbors at a
meeting on July 28, 2004, where redesign options were discussed. Staff suggested that flipping
the building and moving the driveway and garage to the east side of the lot would help lower the
overall height of the building between 1 and 2 feet. This was noted as a possible criteria for ail
other future home development along this street. Following that meeting, the applicant hand
delivered a revised plan for their home on August 9, and noted that he and the appellant had
agreed to the revisions. Staff confirmed this agreement with both parties.
The revised plans did not flip the floor plan but did lower the maximum height of the roof to no
greater than 14 feet, O-inches above the street curb elevation (see Exhibit "A"). Because the
revised plans are only building elevations, and no new site plan or grading plan was submitted,
because of time constraints, staff has added a condition to the resolution being considered by
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DRC2003-00961 - APPEAL/MASSEY
August 18, 2004
Page 2
the Council tonight that stipulates the revised site plan and grading plan be reviewed and
approved by the City Planner prior to issuance of building permits.
CONCLUSION: If the City Council concurs, it would be appropriate to uphold the action of the
Planning Commission and approve the application by the adoption of the attached resolution
with the added condition regarding the maximum building height.
Respectfully submitted,
Bred Buller
City Planner
BB:Is
Attachments: Exhibit"A"- Revised Elevations dated August 9, 2004
Exhibit "B" - City Council Staff Reports dated July 21 and July 7, 2004
Draft Resolution to Deny Appeal and Approve DRC2003-00961
~-24' ABOVE
RIGHT ELEVAT[OI
F~EAF~ ELEVATION '- ~:~ ~'~ '
TH E CITY OF
I~2AN C H 0 C U CAH ON GA
Stafl:Retx
DA/F: July 21, 2004
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Larry Henderson, Acting City Planner
BY: Alan Warren, AICP, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL OF HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW
DRC2003-00961 - LYNN AND RENEI= MASSEY - The appeal of the Planning
Commission decision to approve a single-family residence in the Low Residential
District, located at 8045 Camino Predera, Lot 12 of Tract 10035, as proposed by
Mike and Wendy Stachowiak - APN: 0207-631-02.
ACTION: If the Council concurs that the findings and conclusions contained in the resolution
corresponds with the Council members' comments of the July 7, 2004, meeting, it would be
appropriate to approve the subject appeal by the adoption of the attached resolution.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: At the July 7, 2004, meeting, the City Council determined that the
Planning Commission approval of a two-story single-family house on Lot 12 of Tract 10035
along Camino Predera proposed under DRC2003-00961 did not satisfy all requirements of the
Hillside Development Standards. The Council directed staff to draft a resolution approving the
appeal, thus denying the project.
Respectfully submitted,
BB:AW\ma
Attachments: Draft Resolution to Deny the Application for Hillside Design Review DRC2003-00961
Il //
CC g-/o¢
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REVERSING THE ACTION OF THE
PLANNING COMMISSION AND DENYING THE APPLICATION FOR
HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00961, A REQUEST TO
CONSTRUCT A 3,626 SQUARE FOOT SINGLE-FAMILY HOME ON LOT 12
OF TRACT 10035 IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4 DWELLING
UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED AT 8045 CAMINO PREDERA; AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0207-631-02.
A. Recitals.
1. Mike and Wendy Stachowiak filed an application for the approval of Development
Review DRC2003-00961, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution,
the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application."
2. On the 26th day of May 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date by the
adoption of Resolution 04-69 approving the application.
3. The decision represented by said Planning Commission Resolution was appealed in a
timely manner to this Council by Lynn and Renee Massey.
4. On July 7, 2004, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly
noticed public hearing on the application.
5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A,
of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the
above-referenced public hearing on July 7, 2004, including wdtten and oral staff reports, the minutes
of the above-referenced Planning Commission meeting, and the contents of Planning Commission
Resolution No. 04-69, and together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as
follows:
a. The application applies to property located on the southern slope of Red Hill at
8045 Camino Predera, with a street frontage of 82 feet and lot depth of 181 feet; and
b. The subject property is on the downhill side of Camino Predera, with a slope
gradient of approximately 20-30 percent, and is approximately 40 feet below street grade at the rear
(south) property line; and
c. The application proposes to construct a single-family house with the upper floor
level approximately matching the street grade of Camino Predera; and
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 04- **
DRC2003-00961 - STACHOWIAK
July 21,2004
Page 2
d. The properties to the northeast have been developed with single-family homes.
The properties to the north, east, and west are presently vacant; and
e. The site is vacant and contains no vegetation other than native shrubs and
grasses with a row of mature Silk Oak trees along the south property line; and
f. The applicants are proposing to develop a 3,628 square foot split level house
on a lot that is subject to the City's hillside development regulations.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council dudng the above-
referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above,
this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. That the Red Hill area exhibits the distinctive residential character of the eady
development of the community, and
b. That the proposed design does not enhance, nor continue, the existing residential
character of the Red Hill area, ar}d
c. That the proposed design does not fully address the hillside setting of the
neighborhood, nor the standards and guidelines nor the hillside development ordinance.
d. That the future development of Red Hill should present design features and scale
that are in keeping with the historic character of the surrounding area.
4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, and 3, above, this
Council hereby reverses the action of the Planning Commission, and denies the application.
5. This Council hereby provides notice to Lynn and Renee Massey, the appellants, and
Mike and Wendy Stachowiak, the applicants, that the time within which judicial review of the
decision represented by this Resolution must be sought is governed by the provisions of California
Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6.
6. The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby directed to: (a) certify to the
adoption of this Resolution, and (b) forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified
mail, return-receipt requested, to Mike and Wendy Stachowiak and to Lynn and Renee Massey at
the addresses identified in City records.
This page
Intentionally
Left Blank
T H E C I T Y OF
I~ANCH 0 C U CAHON GA
DATE: July 7, 2004
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Larry Henderson, Acting City Planner
BY: Alan Warren, AICP, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL OF HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW
DRC2003-00961 - LYNN AND RENEE MASSEY - The appeal of the Planning
Commission decision to approve a single-family residence in the Low Residential
District, located at 8045 Camino Predera, Lot 12 of Tract 10035, as proposed by
Mike and Wendy Stachowiak - APN: 0207-631-02.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council deny the appeal filed in
opposition to the project, thus upholding the Planning Commission approval of Hillside Design
Review DRC2003-00961.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The purpose of this public hearing is to consider the specific
request of the appellants, which is for the City Council to deny the Planning Commission
approval for a two story single-family house on Lot 12, Tract 10035 along Camino Predera. The
Planning Commission, by its approval on May 26, 2004, determined that the single-family house
proposed under DRC2003-00961 satisfied all requirements of the Hillside Development
Standards. Two neighboring residents spoke in opposition to the application at the Planning
Commission meeting (see Exhibit "C"). The subject appeal was submitted on June 7, 2004.
While the approved design is well within the City Hillside standards, the appellants are
requesting that the house, and others as may be proposed, be provided with a "lower profile"
than is presently approved (Exhibit "A"). The assumed reason for the lower building profile is to
preserve views from their house on the north side of the street. In a meeting with the Mayor and
staff, the appellants stated that their desire is that the house be lowered so that only the roof is
visible above street grade.
Staff analysis of the proposed hillside design is contained in the attached Planning Commission
report of May 26, 2004.
132
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DRC2003-00961 - APPEAL/MASSEY
July 7, 2004
Page 2
CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily
Bulletin newspaper and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of
the project site.
CONCLUSION: If the City Council concurs with the findings and conclusions of the Planning
Commission, it would be appropriate to deny the subject appeal by the adoption of the attached
resolution.
Respectfully submitted,
Acting City Planner
LH:AW:Is
Attachments: Exhibit "A"- Letter of Appeal, dated June 7, 2004
Exhibit "B" - Planning Commission Staff Report, May 26, 2004
Exhibit "C"- Planning Commission Minutes, May 26, 2004
Draft Resolution to Deny Appeal for Hillside Desig? Review DRC2003-00961
APPEAL '~~-~..~_. REQUEST FORM
· Mayor
(Staff ,u~se only) ~ (~P-~, City Councilmembers
FILE N,.,: ~ ' Jack Lam Cty Manager
; : James Markman, City Attorney
' ' , : : , Dabble Adams, City Clerk
C~y o/Rancho Cu~amon~a Gall Sanchez, Planning Commission Secretary
Case File No.
Project:
Appellant:
E-mail Address:
I acknowledge the filing of this appeal and certify that all of the above infor~,ation is true and correct.
P#nt Name and 77tie
RECEIVED
Date/Time Received Received By Fees Received Receipt No. Fire Receipt No.
i:\Final\Forms\Counter~ppeal Request F~_ro). 04/03/03 G1TY OF RANCHO
A I-7-o¢ cc
Reason for appealing City Planner's decision:
To request the council recognize and agree to the importance of a
lower profile than has currently been approved for this project. This is
necessary in order to set the standard of future projects along Camino
Predera, and to protect the integrity of the Red Hill Community.
A Tentative Map was previously approved approximately two years
ago on these very lots (a Concordia Homes project) which included a
number of requirements and Conditions of Approval that served to reduce
the profile of future residential along this hillside and was supported by
neighbors and City Council following an almost four year collective effort.
These lots will now be developed one by one and because of the
strict hillside standards, all future projects will have an impact on what is
left of the Red Hill area, a unique and beautiful community. Therefore, it is
very important that the Stachowiak project be a model for those to come.
THE CITY OF
~A N C Il 0 C U CA ~I 0 N GA
Staff Report
DATE: May 26, 2004
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM[ Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Alan Warren, AICP, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DR02003-00961 MIKE AND WENDY
STACHOWlAK - A request to develop a single-family residence in the Low
Residential District at 8045 Camino Predera, Lot 12 of Tract 10035, APN:
0207-631-02.
PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Site Characteristics: The site is vacant with native shrubs and grasses with a line of
mature Silk Oaks along the south property line. The grades are approximately 24
percent over most of the lot with significant steeper grades near the south portion.
ANALYSIS:
A. General: The site is a single-family residential lot that had previously been approved for
a new tract development along the south side of Camino Predera on Red Hill facing
Foothill Boulevard. The proposed house complies with the zoning and Hillside
Development Regulations. The design is a true split-level with the first floor entry floor
becoming the second floor on the down slope porHon of the lot. Because of the plus 5-
foot cut to accommodate the down slope "first" floor, and near 7-foot cut of the front
mound for the driveway, the Hillside Development Regulations (Section 17.24.020B.2)
require Planning Commission review and approval. Refer to the Design Review
Committee (DRC) action comments of April 6, 2004, regarding the cut issues.
B. Desiqn Review Committee: The proposal was reviewed and recommended for approval
by the Design Review Committee (McPhail, Stewart, Fong), as submitted on April 6,
2004. At the meeting, the Committee and the applicant were advised of a neighboring
resident's concern regarding the obstruction of existing views to the south. Since the
design complies with the present City standards the Committee approved the project.
The Design Review Committee did request that the applicant investigate the potential of
reducing the roof pitch and moving the footprint a little further down the slope in order to
lower the height of the house. The applicant has chosen to not make any changes to
the plans submitted to the Committee, and has not submitted any information on the
Committee's request to investigate reducing the height of the home. This is a design
~, policy issue and should be discussed by the Planning Commission. The project design
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DRC2003-00961 - STACHOWIAK
May 26, 2004
Page 2
does comply with City standards, but it is possible to redesign the project and further
reduce the height of the home. The Committee offered to review, on its consent
calendar, any changes the applicant may wish to consider regarding the neighboring
resident's concerns.
C. Environmental Assessment: The application is categorically exempt from CEQA review.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends affer reviewing the height and design of the home,
approval of DRC2004-00961 as submitted or with modified conditions, by the adoption of the
attached Resolution of Approval.
Brad Buller
City Planner
BB:AW:Is
Attachments: Exhibit "A"- Location Map
Exhibit "B" - Site Plan
Exhibit"C"- Grading Plan
Exhibit "D"- Sections
Exhibit "E" - Roof Plan/Main Floorplan
Exhibit "F" - Lower Floorplan
Exhibit "G"- Elevations
Exhibit "H" - Design Review Committee Action Minutes April 6, 2004
Exhibit "1" - Letter from Chuck Buquet dated April 5, 2004
Draft Resolution of Approval for DRC2003-00961
Vicinity Map
DRC2003-00961
Foothill Blvd.
Exhibit
',~ ~'~ 4, ~ ~ ..........................................
t ~ , ~ ......... COUNTRy
S~TE PREDERA
I
~ ,, VICINITY MAP
~ ~ "' /23/'04
SITE PLAN
PROJECT INFORMATION STACHOWIAK RESIDENCE
LOT 12 TRACT 10055
'~.~" ~*~" 8045 CAMINO PREDERA
LOT COVERAGE --- 1954 SF ~ F~,8IB~ RANCHO CUCAMONOA CA 91750
% LOT COVERAGE -- 15%
~ ~,*,, I ,.~%~ A DRC 2005-0096~
.... /,,~,,, r~ ...........................
GRADING PLAN
STACHOWlAK RESIDENCE
LOT 12 TRACT 10035
8045 CAMINO PREDERA
RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91730
DRC 2005-00961
~ ~ . ......... ~ ...... SECTION D-D
SECTION B-B
SECTION E-E ......
VIEW AT CURB HE~OHT
............. ~'~7~ X - S E C T JO N S
s~c~,~, %-c ~ .... ~ s~c,ow~
s~ S~T ~ Or ~ ~ X-S~CT ~OC~O~ LOT 17 TRACT 10035
'~'~ ...... ~ .... 8045 CAMINO PREDERA
~. ~"'"~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91730
~u. ~. ~,,, ~ ~.~ % ¢ ~ DRC 2003-00961
MAIN FLOOR PLAN
LOLt~ FLOOR PLAN
5~T NO. ~
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
7:10 p.m. Alan Warren April 6, 2004
HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2003-00961 - MIKE & WENDY STACHOWIAK - A request to
develop a single-family residence in the Low Residential Distdct at 8045 Camino Predera Street, Lot
12 of Tract 10035 - APN: 0207-631-02.
Desiqn Parameters: The site is a single-family residential lot that had previously been approved for
a new tract development along the south side of Camino Predera Street above Foothill Boulevard.
The previous design review application proposed a private street along the lower portions of the lots
that fronted on Camino Predera Street. Vehicle access to many of the lots was to be from the south
(downhill side of lots) off the private street. The subject lot was to be part of the access to the
pdvate street that was to be attained with a lot line adjustment and deletion of one of the 21 lots.
The recent development approval for the area included a private ddve access along the south
portions of each lot. In order to keep this option open for future development consideration, staff
recommends that an access easement be provided for the benefit of the lot to the east. Further,
staff recommends that a similar easement be provided on the remaining lots that were to gain
vehicle access along the south portion of the lots. The project proponent has decided to develop
only a few of the lots and to sell most of the original lots to individual developers. The previous
project had a controversial process with residents on the north side of Camino Predera Street in
opposition to the potential blocking of views south across the site.
The grades are around 24 pement over most of the lot with significant steeper grades near the south
portion.
Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee
discussion.
Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion
regarding this project:
1. The major issue for any house product proposed on the south side of the street is the concam
of residents on the north side regarding potential view obstructions to the south. The
proposed house is a true split level design that exhibits a single-story facing the street. This
entry level becomes the second floor as the structure continues down the slope. The two-
story portion faces south down the slope. The house fits within the building envelope as
required by the Hillside Development provisions.
2. Due to the lowering of the house in relation to the existing street level, grading cuts in excess
of 5 feet (up to 9 feet) are proposed. As a result, the project will need to be approved by the
Planning Commission as required by the Hillside Development standards. The cut was
needed to lower the house in relation to the existing street grade. Staff believes that the
amount of vertical cut is justified in this case to lower the house to single-story level with the
street grade
3. As part of the grading design, a significant mound (remnant feature of the Camino Predera
roadway cut) is proposed to be removed from the front yard area. The isolated mound does
not appear to be a significant land feature and, therefore, staff does not believe its retention is
important to the intent of the hillside standards.
Secondary Issue~: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the
Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues:
1. There is an existing line of mature trees (Silk Oaks) along the south portion of the site. The
grading for the rear yard does not appear to affect the trees retention. Staff recommends that
the trees be protected in an appr0Pdate manner during construction.
2. City residential standards require a 15-foot level backyard area immediately behind the rear
wall of houses. The level area behind the rear wall is less than this amount. Staff
recommends that a 15-foot level area be provided with a deck or stepped retaining walls
below the proposed retaining walls just behind and below the rear ofthe house. Staff believes
such a feature will satisfy the intent of the rear backyard requirement.
3. Front yard and rear slope landscaping should be provided in pursuant to City standards.
Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be
incorporated into the project design without discussion:
1. Round off and contour all graded slopes to blend with the existing terrain, and present a more
natural appearance.
2. Establish proper soil management techniques to reduce the adverse effects (i.e., erosion) of
grading.
3. Select plant materials for their suitability to the environment and compatibility with Xedscape
principles (i.e., wa~er conservation). Include existing mature trees worthy of preservation in the
landscape concept.
4. Select fast growing vegetative ground covers for fill/cut slope areas to retard soil erosion.
5. Significant landscaping is required for down slope elevations. Slopes that required
landscaping shall be planted with informal clusters of trees and shrubs to soften and vary the
slope plane. Jute netting is required.
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee forward the application to the
Planning Commission with a favorable recommendation subject to the above listed conditions.
Desi.qn Review Committee Action:
Members Present: McPhail, Stewart, Fong
Staff Planner: Alan Warren
The Committee received and reviewed written comments from neighboring residents requesting
alternative designs be considered.
The Committee approved the project, with a Conceptual Planting Plan, as submitted and with the
above listed conditions except as noted:
1. The Committee requested that the applicant investigate the potential of reducing the roof pitch
and moving the footprint a little further down the slope in order to lower the height of the
house. The modification should come back to the DRC on the Consent Calendar.
2. The rear 15-foot level are. a required in the backyard maybe attained with an expanded deck
area at the rear of the house.
3. The specific pool area design is not required at this time, but it should be returned to the DRC
as a MDR application when the pool plans have reached a more detailed concept.
/4 7
April 5, 2004
Brad Buller, City Planner
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P. O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-0807
Re: Hillside Design Review DRC2003-00768 - Lot 17 of Tract 10035 -
APN: 0207-631-07
Hillside Design Review DRC2003-00961 - Lot 12 of Tract 10035 -
APN: 0207-631-02
Dear Brad:
This is as a follow-up to a number of meetings and discussions concerning
development of the hillside area located on the East Side of Camino Predera
over the past several years. As you will recall, the referenced lots are within a
tract that was the subject of a tentative tract map that involved considerable
review and input from the City and property owners along this street. The
approved tentative map was abandoned when the developer determined that the
measures collectively arrived on by the City, the developer and adjacent property
owners were not cost-effective for timely development of this property. The
developer has since developed three lots at the north end of this tract and is
apparently selling this tract off for individual lot development of what was
originally intended as a custom lot subdivision.
This correspondence is to register my continuing concern with what has been
proposed and approved along one of the last remaining vestiges of the Red Hill
area over the past several months. This correspondence is to formally request
that careful study be given to impacts of the referenced and future development
of this particular hillside area pdor to any Design Review Approvals by either City
staff or the Planning Commission. The Red Hill area is one of the only areas
within the southwestern portion of the City that allows a unique opportunity for
residential development that can capitalize on the natural hill contours and still
allow for views of the valley that can be shared by all with proper development of
this area.
The City of Rancho Cucamonga has a reputation of challenging builders to
design projects that go well beyond "meeting the requirements" as I have
experienced first hand with some of the projects that I have been a part of over
many years. I believe that the result has, or in this case, will be development that
compliments the area that will be embraced by existing and new residents in
each case. While development interests do not often appreciate this approach,
the result can be a supedor byproduct of the additional attention to detail that
occurs with such a process.
The City of Rancho Cucamonga has hillside development standards that are
intended to provide direction to encourage development that is sensitive to the
unique characteristics common to hillside properties. During the tentative tract
map review and approval process, the Planning Commission gave direction to
the developer to reduce the profile of the residential product through a
combination of split level design and exploration of driveway alternatives that
could serve to reduce the overall residential profiles along this hillside slope. A
unique driveway access design proposed by the developer and approved by the
Planning Commission reduced the need to have a row effect of driveways,
garages and houses along the eastern edge of Camino Predera.
The three homes nearing completion on the northern three lots, while generally
attractive, have resulted in an imposing street massing and height that does not
seem appropriate for a hillside area. The sideyard setback areas between these
large houses are very similar to a normal tract configuration and in essence,
block out any view of the valley from the existing custom homes built some years
ago across the street on the West Side of Camino Predera. The City's minimum
architectural standards included within the hillside development requirements
states that buildings on hillsides should be terraced to follow the slope so the
building correctly fits into the ground and minimizes the effect on the hillside.
Further guidance is given in these standards to not allow rigid vertical elements
on the downhill side of the residence. Specifically, "The design of the structure
shall give consideration to the lot's size and configuration in order to avoid the
appearance of overbuilding or crowding and to minimize the blocking of views.
For example, within a development, the majority of the units should not be
designed with minimum setback to minimum setback." The three houses, when
viewed both from Camino Predera and at the east elevation when viewed from
Vineyard, appear overbuilt for the hillside area constructed.
The referenced development proposed for Lot 17 and Lot 12 also appear to have
a large building mass and profile in relation to the hillside condition, based upon
my last review of plans filed with the City for these lots. Both appear to be
designed to create as high a finished floor grade as may be possible in order to
maximize "view capture" for future residents. They appear to have the lower floor
grade that is also a substantial height above the proposed rear yard grade, which
makes the rear vertical element more pronounced than one would expect when
seeking to reduce the appearance of overbuilding when viewed from the east.
We are a bit perplexed as to why Lot 17 is on the Design Review Committee
agenda, even as a consent agenda item. It was our understanding during a
meeting with you and our concerned neighbor some weeks ago that this design
was already the subject of a City Planner Approval in December 2003. He was
2
advised that he had no recourse as to design review input or reconsideration of
the pad elevation that was approved at that time. As you are probably well
aware, this lot now has what appears to be a precise grade pad that was
completed a few weeks ago, and the lot between this lot and the three heady
constructed houses has been mass graded by the builder.
The City's hillside development standards also provide that "Any significant
public vista or view corridor as seen from a secondary, collector or major arterial
should be protected." On this same page of the materials under the "This"
illustrative exhibit, it states "Siting the new dwelling downhill and changing the
massing will allow better views for the uphill house." Under the "Not This"
illustrative exhibit, it states "Siting the new building uphill near the existing
dwelling will obstruct most of the view for the uphill house." This view corddor
text continues "Projects should incorporate clustering, variable setbacks, multiple
orientations, and other site planning techniques to preserve open spaces, protect
natural features, and offer views to residents." Gang driveways as also
illustrated within the City's hillside development standards document, and
proposed with the tentative tract map that was abandoned by the developer, also
could serve to reduce profile along the street edge of this hillside area. This
would allow for a housing product that was garage loaded from the base, and
allow for more flexibility with the overall residential pad grade, rather than
creating a need to have a fixed number of driveways and garages along the
existing streetscape. The existing homeowners and property owners along the
West Side of Camino Predera do not expect to have a completely unobstructed
view of the valley as they currently have with this property being vacant. They
also do not believe it unreasonable to expect to be able to enjoy some
preservation of view sharing opportunity with any new development that may be
contemplated for these vacant lots.
Based upon the foregoing, we are requesting that the referenced design review
consideration be continued until the issues presented with this correspondence
can be evaluated within the context of the City's hillside development standards,
as well as within the context of the City's Checklist for Hillside Design Review.
We believe that a master plan approach should be undertaken to determine what
would be reasonable and prudent residential product along the entire hillside
slope area, and not just on a case by case basis as currently being provided
under the individual lot development strategy being followed by the builder. We
also believe that this existing hillside area needs to be developed in a manner
provided in the City's hillside guidelines, which states "Design of building sites
should be sensitive to the natural terrain" and should also respect the sensitivity
of the existing properties on both sides of the street. This hillside is too important
a resource to allow it to continue to be developed in a case by case piecemeal
approach.
3
We have taken the liberty of enclosing various documents and materials for your
ease in review as pertains to the references and attributed text in the foregoing
correspondence. We truly hope that you and the Design Review Committee will
seriously consider our request as being timely with what we believe will be
development that we expect will continue to be otherwise individually presented
along this entire hillside area.
Thank you for your time and attention to this matter of considerable importance
to our neighborhood. Please feel free to contact me at your earliest opportunity
should you have any questions or need of additional information or assistance
with all the foregoing.
Sincerely,
Chuck and Suzanne Buquet
8725 Predera Court
Enclosures
Cc: Planning Commission
Mayor and City Council
4
17.24.070 Development standards.
W~thin the framework of previous design guidelines, the following standards have been
prepared to give more specific direction. These are minimum standards and shall apply to
any use, development, or alteration of land as specified in Section 17.24.020.
D. Architecture.
1. The building envelope for all structures shall be as follows:
a. Downhill Lot - An overall maximum height of 30 feet is permitted, as measured from
finished grade, from the minimum front setback extending towards the rear of the lot. The
maximum height at the side setbacks shall be 15 feet extending up towards the center of
the lot at a 45 degree angle to a maximum height of 30 feet as measured from finished
grade.
BUILDING ENVELOPE FOR DOWNHILL LOT
Downhill Section \?~';;~ [ I Mifllm~fft side setba=k
S~eet ~vatioa ·,
b. Uphill Lot - A maximum height of 15 feet is permitted at the minimum front setback and
shall extend up and toward the rear of the lot at a 45 degree angle to a maximum overall
height of 30 feet as measured from finished grade. A maximum height at the side setbacks
shall be 15 feet extending up toward the center of the lot at a 45 degree angle to a
maximum height of 30 feet as measured from finished grade,
BUILDING ENVELOPE FOR UPHILL LOT
.j~ ,.,...th.ok Street Elevation
Uphill Section
c. Cross Slope lots - A maximum overall height of 30 feet is permitted, as measured from
finished grade, from the minimum front setback extending toward the rear of the lot. The
maximum height at the side setbacks shall be 15 feet extending up toward the center of
the lot at a 45 degree angle to a maximum of 30 feet as measured from finished grade.
d. The foregoing previsions are intended to apply to the main bulk and overall mass of the
building. Architectural enrichments and variations in roof massing are encouraged.
Projections above the height limits for architectural features may be considered subject to
the previsions contained in Section 17.04.050-B-1-f.
2. Terrace the building to follow the slope. Where possible, use roofs on lower levels for
the deck open spaces of upper levels. Where decks are provided, they shall be a minimum
of 6 feet in width to provide adequate usable area and to effectively break-up the mass.
THIS ..... NOT THIS
3. Provide architectural treatment to all sides of a structure. Elements of the architectural
treatment used on the front facade shall be repeated on all sides of a structure with
additional emphasis on those elevations visible from adjacent properties or public rights-of-
way
THIS
NOT THIS /'lllL/u~tlJr.& Oi"upt the
2. Preserve views of significant visual features as seen from both within and outside a
hillside development. When designing lots and plotting homes, the following provisions
should be taken into consideration:
a. Homes should be odented to allow view opportunities, although such views may be
limited; however, residential privacy should not be unreasonably sacrificed.
/55
THIS
" ~ NOT THIS
b. Any significant public vista or view corridor as seen from a secondary, collector or major
arterial should be protected.
3. Projects should incorporate clustenng, vadable setbacks, multiple orientations, and
other site planning techniques to preserve open spaces, protect natural features, and offer
views to residents.
4. Whenever possible, as based on the overall parcel configuration and orientation, homes
shoutd be designed to front onto eastJwest streets or should be plotted to follow the natural
contours rather than fronting onto north/south streets.
5. Where possible, graded areas should be designed with manufactured slopes located on
the uphill side of structures, thereby, hiding the slope behind the structure.
THIS
NOT THIS
6. Clustering of development through transfer of dwelling unit allocations should be
encouraged in environmentally sensitive areas in order to reduce the potential for fire
157
hazard and spread, erosion and excess runoff and to preserve existing natural features
and open space.
B. Driveways and Roadways.
1. Driveways which serve more than one parcel are encouraged as a method of reducing
unnecessary grading, paving and site disturbance.
2. Roadways should conform to the natural landform. They should not greatly alter the
physical and visual character of a hillside by creating large notches in ridgelines or by
defining wide straight alignments. Reduced mad sections, split sections, and parking bays
should be considered in the lay-out of hillside streets to reduce grading.
NOT THIS
2. The design of the structure shall give consideration to the lot's size and configuration in
order to avoid the appearance of overbuilding or crowding and to minimize the blocking of
views. For example, within a development, the majodty of the units should not be designed
with minimum setback to minimum setback.
3. Avoid large expanses of a single material on walls, roofs, or paving areas. Create
interesting, small scale patterns by breaking-up building mass, van/ing building materials,
and through design and placement of windows and doom.
THIS NOT THIS
4. Building materials and color schemes should blend with the natural landscape. Treated
wood or materials of a wood-like appearance, having the necessary fire retardant
characteristics, are encouraged for extedor surfaces. Where extedor stucco is used, it
should have a final coat of integrated color in a muted earth tone. Contrasting color
accents should be kept to a minimum, particularly on the view side. Use of other natural
materials, such as river rock, is encouraged.
D. Walls and Fences.
1. Walls and fences can be used to define a sense of place ahd create an attractive
appearance. However, walls should not dominate a view, and their height should be
limited adjacent to a street or trail or within a rear yard. Terracing and extensive
landscaping can reduce the effective bulk. In addition, street front walls should incorporate
varying design and natural materials. The use of open view fencing is enceureged, so long
as adequate public safety and residential pdvacy are maintained.
"' ~ R~ml~ w~l~ - ~ end ~ e~v~.-
~ L~, etava~n, ~ ~e ofpm~sed.~i~ p~d~.
~ S~e~ - ex~s~ e~ pm~ed cressida, ~pm~n~, ~gh~mf-way, e~. Sh~ ~en~ m~i a~
· ..
· '. ' ~. In~e ~ ofbp~e~a).. . .
AnY bf the foll°wlng ltems maY be mqulmd based upon further revlew of ~e de~pm~t ~pll~, Thd confon~ ~f
these ifenm am described in other handouts, Stale Regutations, or tho CA*Y'~ Ordlnsnne:
~ . -. ·Slope AnalYS L~ Map: F°r the purpose of de,straining the amount and location of land, es'
it exists in its natuial state, 'by a range of slope gradients · ,
"* :'i: .' . [~ Use I~ese topographical mop prepared by · registered civil en~neer, land. cape emhitac~ ~rlicen~edtan~ surveyor.
, .* ~..Dmwnt~es~eleofn~t~es~then1in~ht~*~feetandac~nt~u~interv~s~me~sGmdingp~an.~
· ~ ~ Indude ell surrounding properties wf~*n 150 feet of the.alta boundelfe~
0 DrewMopebend~infoemngeofOupfoSpercent,>Spe~er~op~10pe~o~>lO~t.~lS~n~>15
.. . . . pement.up fo ~O pement. > 20 pemenl up to 25 percen~ >25 pempnt up fo SO percen~ end >30 pe~~
.... . Cel~utaletandamelnacr~ln~achal~petrandanclasspercentalleof~tefothlecmage.
.. Draw e'heavy, e~lld r~e Indi~elfog the B pement grade d/f~mn~/, ,.
[~ In addition, one ~op~of the Map elmll be colored with each slope bendin contm~Ung ~
[~ Ioclude souwe of cl~t~ and scale of data u~d ln slope ensty~ta end ~lope prof//es.
0 $i~e~a~be~curate~y~cu~eted~nd~d~nt~ndc~n~3taofw~ththe~e~e~canm!ne~in~ec~r~1~24~4~of
O- Slope Profiles: A minimum of throe slope profiles shall:
Drawn st ~sme scale and Indexed. or keyed, fo the Slope Anelyd~ Mop.
~ Show existing an~l p~cl topography, etruot~res, end infmelru~tum. Pmpo~e'd topography, atr~c~uras and
infrestrucfum cheil be drown with · he~,y, ~lid line..ExiMfog topogrephy, afng~um~.·end irgrmab~cfure shell be
dmwn with e slmrt cleshe~
Hillside DR Filing - 11/99 * · . Page
RESOLUTION NO 04-69
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT
REVIEW DRC2003-00961, A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A 3,628
SQUARE FOOT SINGLE-FAMILY HOME ON LOT 12 OF TRACT 10035 IN
THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE),
LOCATED AT 8045 CAMINO PREDERA; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0207-631-O2.
A. Recitals.
1. Mike and Wendy Stachowiak filed an application for the approval of Development
Review DRC2003-00961, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution,
the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application."
2. On the 26th day of May 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the. Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are tree and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced meeting on May 26, 2004, including wdtten and oral staff reports, this Commission
hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to property located at 8045 Camino Predera, with a street
frontage of 82 feet and lot depth of 181 feet; and
b. The subject preperty is on the downhill side of Camino Predera, with slope gradient
of approximately 20-30 percent, and is approximately 40 feet below street grade at the rear (south)
property line; and
c. The application proposes to construct a single-family house with the upper floor
level approximately matching the street grade of Camino Predera; and
d. The properties to the northeast have been developed with single-family homes.
The properties to the north, east, and west are presently vacant; and
e. The site is vacant and contains no vegetation other than native shrubs and grasses
with a row of mature Silk Oaks along the south property line; and
f. A 15-foot pdvate drainage and equestrian easement exists along the rear of the site
that is shared equally with property owners to the north; and
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-69
DRC2003-00961 - STACHOWIAK
May 26, 2004
Page 2
g. The proposed development is consistent with single-family development in the area
(Tract 10035); and
h. The applicants are proposing to develop a 3628 square foot split level house on a
lot that is subject to the City's hillside development regulations.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above,
this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. The proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and
b. The proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and
the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and
c. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the
Development Code; and
d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be
detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
4. The Commission hereby finds and determines that the project identified in this Resolution
is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental QualityAct of 1970, as
amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pumuant to Section 15303(a) of the State
CEQA Guidelines.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth
below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
PlanninR Division:
1) Approval is for a 3,628 square foot home on Lot 12 of Tract 10035,
located at 8045 Camino Predera.
2) In addition to the vegetation required by the Hillside Ordinance,
extensive fast growing ground cover plantings will be required on the
front and rear slope areas to provide erosion control to the satisfaction
of the City Planner. Jute netting is required.
3) Establish proper soil management techniques to reduce the adverse
effects (i.e., erosion) of grading.
4)Round off and contour all graded slopes to blend with the existing
terrain, and to present a natural appearance.
5) Retaining walls exposed to public view and return walls are to be
decorative masonry and compatible with the architectural style.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-69
DRC2003-0096'1 - STACHOWIAK
May 26, 2004
Page 3
6) A detailed Planting and Irrigation Plan, including slope planting, shall
be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City
Planner review and approval pdor to the issuance of building permits.
7) The rear 15-foot level area required in the backyard may be attained
with an expanded deck area at the rear of the house.
8) The existing Silk Oak trees shall be preserved in place.
· 9) The garage roof pitch shall be reduced so as to lower the garage roof
peak to the same height as the roof peak over the main portion of the
house.
Enqineednq Division:
1 ) Install ddve approach per City standards, to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer. Protect existing improvements and repaidreplace all
damaged improvements as directed by the City Engineer:
a. Revise existing Street Improvement Plans Drawing No. 922 as
required by the City Engineer. No street tree installations are
required.
b. Prior to any work being performed in the Public right-of-way, fees
shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the
City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required.
2) Prevent all drainage from crossing over side lot lines and convey all
site flows to public street, storm drain or other drainage easement.
3) Provide swales for over flow purposes in case sump area drains
become blocked. Provide for surface drainage to pass through/over
any proposed walls, fences etc. from rear to side and side to front
yards. Adequate provisions shall be made for conveyance and
disposal of sur[ace drainage entedng and exiting the property.
4) Provide a minimum 1-foot wide earthen bench on-site adjacent to all
property lines, then slope at maximum 20 percent to join side yard
swale flowline.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF MAY 2004.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Rich Macias, Chairman
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-69
DRC2003-00961 - STACHOWIAK
May 26, 2004
Page 4
I, Bred Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 26th day of May 2004, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, MAClAS, McNIEL, McPHAIL, STEWART
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
STANDARD CONDITIONS
PROJECT #: DRC2003-00961
SUBJECT: Hillside Design Review
APPLICANT: Mike and Wendy Stachowiak
LOCATION: 8045 Camino Predera, Lot 12, Tract 10035
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE
WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
A. General Requirementscompletion Date
1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its / /
agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to
relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or
employees, for any Court costs and atlomey~s fees which the City, its agents, officers, or
employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole
discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation
shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition.
2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 04-69, Standard /.~/
Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The
sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and
are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect.
B. Time Limits
1. Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or Development/Design Review approval shall expire if /_~/
building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date
of approval. No extensions are allowed.
C. Site Development
1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include / /_.__
site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and
grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, and the Development
Code regulations.
SC-1-04 I
i:~planning\final~plngcomm\drc2003-00961 condS-26.doc
project No. DRC2003-00961
Completion Date
2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions /~
of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner.
3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building COde and /___/ ..
State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be
submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division
to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy.
4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be / /
submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits.
5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for / /
consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment,
building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved
use has commenced, whichever comes first.
6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all / /
other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effsct at the
time of building permit issuance.
7. If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units with/__~/
all receptacles shielded from public view.
8. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be /.__/
located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete
or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. For single-
family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults.
9. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, /.__/
including proper illumination.
10. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property / /
owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape
maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to
the issuance of building permits.
11. For single family residential development, a 2-inch galvanized pipe shall be attached to each /__/
support post for all wood fences, with a minimum of two Y~-inch lag bolts, to withstand high winds.
Both post and pipe shall be installed in an 18-inch deep concrete footing. Pipe shall extend at
least 4 feet, 6 inches above grade.
12. Wood fencing shall be treated with stain, paint, or water sealant. /---/
13. Slope fencing along side preperty lines may be wrought iron or black plastic coated chain link to /~/
maintain an open feeling and enhance views.
14. Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river reck. Other stone veneers may bo manufactured /~/
products.
D. Building Design
1. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or /.___/
projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and
streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be amhitecturally integrated
with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Details shall be
included in building plans.
SC-1-04
2
i:~olanning\final\forms~p~ngcomm\drc2003-00961 condS-2$.doc
Project No. DRC2003-00961
Completion Date
E. Landscaping
1. A detailed landscape and irrigation ptan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in / /
the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape amhitect and
submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior ~ ~ ~ ~1.
final map approval in the case of a custom.lot subdivision.
2. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in __/ /.__
accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19.08.110, and so noted on the grading plans. The
location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be
shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's
recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and tdmming methods.
3. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 ~/ /.__
slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion
control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be
installed by the developer prior to occupancy.
4. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, bat less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater .__/ /___
slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as
follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size
shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks
in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or
larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in
staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall
include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy.
5. For single-family residential development, ali slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously ___/ /~
maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold
and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be
conducted by the Planning Division to determine that they are in satisfactory condition.
6. Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development ._~/
Code and/or Hillside Development Standards. This requirement shall be in addition to the
required street trees and slope planting.
7. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in .__./~/
the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and
coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the
Engineering Division.
8. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the ___/ /
perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer.
9. Ail walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the .___/.__/
design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division.
F. Other Agencies
1. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location /__~
of mailboxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for
mailboxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the
overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of
building permits.
SC-1-04
3
i:~planning\final\forms~plngcomm\drc2003*00961 cond5-26.doc
Project No. DRC2003-O0961
Cornpletion Date
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR
COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S)
G. General Requirements
1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: .__/ /--_
a. Site/Pict Plan;
b. Foundation Plan;
c. Floor Plan;
d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan;
e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size
of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams;
f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste
diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air
conditioning; and
g. Planning Division Project Number (i.e., SUBTT #, SUBTPM#, DRC #) clearly identified on
the outside of all plans.
2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. .__./ /___
Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required pdor to plan check submittal.
3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to .~ /___
the City prior to permit issuance.
4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. ~ /---
H. Site Development
1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be ~ /.__
marked with the project file number (i.e., DRC2001-00001). The applicant shall comply with the
latest adopted Ca forn a Codes, and a other app cab e codes, ordinances, and regulations in
effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Division for availability of
the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts.
2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential project or major addition, the applicant ._._/ ~
shal~ pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to:
City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and
Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School
Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division
prior to permit issuance.
3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map ~ /
recordation and prior to issuance of building permits.
4. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday _._./ /
through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays.
SC-1-04
4
i:~planning\fina~,forms~plngcorn rn\drc2003-00961 cond5-26.doc
Project No. DRC2003-00961
Completion Date
I. New Structures
1. Provide compliance with the Califomia Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances / /
considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness.
2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. / /
3. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions. / /
J. Grading
1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Building Code, City Grading/ /
Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial
conformance with the approved grading plan.
2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to ! /
perform such work.
3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and. submitted at the ___/ /~
time of application for grading plan check.
4. The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, ~ /___
submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building
permits.
5. In hillside areas, residential developments shall be graded and constructed consistent with the ~ /___
standards contained in the Hillside Development Regulations Section 17.24.070.
6. A separate grading p~lan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for ~ /~
existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of
combined cut and fill. The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California
registered Civil Engineer.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR
COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
K. Security Hardware
1. A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doora. --/ /
2. One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doora. If windows ara within / /
40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used.
3. All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices. /~
L. Windows
1. All sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be lifted / /
from frame or track in any manner.
M. Building Numbering
1. Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for night'time / /
visibility.
SC-1-04
5
i:~olanning\finaEforrns~olngcomrn\drc2003'00961 condS-26-d°c
Project No. DRC2003-00961
Comoletion Date
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING
SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
SEE A'I'I'ACHED
SC-1-04
6
/7/
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT
STANDARD CONDITIONS
PROJECT/FILE #: DRC2003-00961 APPLICANT NAME: Concordia RC
PROJECT NAME: Stachowiak OCCUPANCY CLASS: R-3
LOCATION: 8045 Camino Predera FLOOR AREA: 1954 sq.ft.
DATE: 10-20-03 · TYPE CONSTRUCTION: V-n
PLAN TYPE: SFR FD REVIEW BY: Moises Eskenazi
PLANNER: Alan Warren Non-High Fire Hazard
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR
PROJECT.
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT- STANDARD CONDITIONS & REQUIREMENTS.
FSC-1 Prior to building permit issuance complete the following:
1. The required fire flow for this project is 1000 Clallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20
pounds per square inch. This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix Ill-A, as
amended. Contact CCWD for a fire flow test. Please allow 10 working days for test results. Submit the fire
flow letter from CCWD to FCS (909) 477-2713.
2. Illustrate the location of the closest fire hydrants to the property on the site plan to be submitted.
FCS- 2 Prior to occupancy final or final complete the following:
1. Address Single-family: New single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers
on a contrasting background. The numbers sha~l be internally or extemally illuminated during periods of
darkness. The numbers shalt be visible from the street. When building setback from the public roadway
exceeds 100 feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be disptayed at the property entry.
/TZ
its residents will not have to live with what the County dictates. He felt annexation is a better
;e for the City.
oner McPhail concurred. She said that in a perfect wortd there would be no more
that is not reality. She felt that if development occurs under County standards, the
City would something the City does not want. She believed having the area
under City ows certain safeguards that are important for the future.
Commissioner the action is similar to what the Commission acted upon several
weeks ago. She are always very challenging. She noted that the City could
deal with uire mitigation measures when,a specific project comes before
the City in the future, the area is a positive step because she believed any
development under Count ~ would have a higher density and less open space and the City
would have less control She thought the City has a higher standard of
development than the County. the proposal includes considerably more conservation land
and open space than under ~ and she felt that is a positive outcome. She noted
environmental issues would still Based upon what was before the Commission
tonight, she felt the project should be a She again noted that equestrian issues could be
addressed when a development project is
Commissioner McNiel stated that wher ~repared, the Sphere of Influence
was addressed because the land was ultimately to ~ of the City, particularly
with respect to Police and Fire services. He said same time the City was planning the
Sphere, the County was also planning the sphere and document contained some
frightening aspects. He indicated one such idea was t¢ , transfers where a 100-acre site
with only 10 buildable acres could take the yield of the 100 it on the 10 acres, which
could result in condominiums. He observed the City plan do. es not that prospect. He said the
City has made every possible effort to draw the Sphere , so that the City would
have better control, resulting in less density and a better fit with image. He moved
approval of the resolutions.
Chairman Macias agreed with the Commissioners' comments. He was
given the public testimony, would allow the City to better address any sig s that occur
as a result of future development at the site. He was encouraged by the reduction can be
built and the increase in conservation land. He felt the project is the of a very
straightforward planning effort that will stand the test of any legal challenge.
Motion: Moved by McNiel, seconded by Fletcher, to adopt the resol'
of Annexation DRC2003-00961, General Plan Amendment DRC2003-01162, and Etlwanda
Specific Plan Amendment DRC2003-01163. Motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: FLETCHER, MAClAS, McNIEL, McPHAIL, STEWART
NOES: NONE
,~j. HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2003-00961 - MIKE AND WENDY STACHOWIAK- A request
to develop a single-family residence in the Low Residential District, located at 8045 Camino
Predera, Lot 12 of Tract 10035 -APN: 0207-631-02.
Alan Warren, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report.
Chairman Macias invited public comments.
Planning Commission Minutes -9- May 26, 2004
Mike Schneider, Cornerstone Group, 1485 Spruce Street, Riverside, stated he represented Mike and
Wendy Stachowiak. He said they worked with staff about eight months. He reported they looked at
the possibility of moving the house 5 feet down the hill and it only reduced the total height 1 foot
while increasing the slope on the ddveway to an unacceptable level. He commented that Mr. Buquet
voiced concerns about the view, but stated that Mr. Buquet's house is several houses down the
street. He said they looked at the possibility of using a hip mol over the garage but it reduced the
amount of storage that they want to put there. He indicated it would be possible to change the
roofline.
Wendy Stachowiak, 8045 Camino Predera, Rancho Cucamonga stated they spoke to most of the
homeowners on the street and they only received opposition from one.
Mike Stachowiak, 8045 Camino Predera, Rancho Cucamonga, commented that the Hillside
regulations state that houses cannot exceed 30 feet and pointed out that their house is only 22 feet.
He said the cC&Rs dictate a height no higher than 20 feet above the curb at the midpoint of the lot
and their house is 4 feet below that maximum. He maintained they have done a lot to be within
limits.
Mm. Stachowiak indicated they originally wanted a 2-story house with the first story at ground level
and the second story above, but they changed it to put the second story below street level. She felt
they have done everything to make everyone else happy and still get what they want.
Mr. Schneider noted that the excessive cut, which requires Commission review, will occur inside the
house and will not be seen from the outside.
Mr. Stachowiak said that when Camino Predere Street was constructed, excess dirt was placed on
their lot. He stated they would not have excess cut if that had not happened.
Renee Messey, 8088 Camino Predera, stated the road actually cut through the natural hill and no
excess fill was placed on the lot. She said that several years ago Concordia Homes planned a tract
at this location and the neighbors spent a lot of time with staff and the developer to design an
acceptable project; however it never was built. She said that plan called for the three homes just
finished to the east, two homes at street level, and the remaining homes below street level with
another street to the south for access. She commented that the lots are now being sold separately.
She said she spoke with Mr. Warren and Brad Buller about this difficult hillside area that will be built
house by house. She felt it is important that this house set the standard because it is in the middle
of the houses yet to be built. She believed the area is unique and said Rancho Cucamonga
shouldn't look like recent development in Upland where the houses are dght next to each other and
square. She thought such development feels like it is closing in on the area. She favored staffs
suggestion to consider moving the house toward the back end of the property because she thought it
would set the standard for open space that was planned for in the Concordia tract. She said the
house across the street will be huge and she will be affected by what is built there. She asked the
Commission to look at the recommendations of the Design Review Committee and direct the
applicant to look at it further.
Chuck Buquet, 725 Predera Court, Rancho Cucamonga, stated the project is one lot cattycomer
from where he lives. He said his objection is not about his view. He commented that Concordia
originally wanted to construct cookie-cutter 2-story houses and they were told to drop the homes. He
said Concordia got an approval and then decided to sell off the lots in what he felt was a "bait-and-
switch" action. He felt it is regrettable that Planning's policy is that a single lot development is
treated as one man's castle. He believed the three houses to the north are not castles. He said the
proposed house is on the best of the remaining lots to be developed. He acknowledged the lot
would be developed but said he wants to make sure it is a good plan. He wanted the house reduced
to a single-story profile with the house set behind the garage. He noted the house is set back 27 feet
from the curb face and believed it wodd be better to reduce the roofline and reduce the garage
Planning Commission Minutes -10- May 26, 2004
profile to a single story. He wanted the house to be dropped so it would not stick out. He
commented the house is 3,600 square feet, which he felt is large for the lot. He said the neighbors
do not want a corridor effect. He felt the Design Review Committee had good suggestions to reduce
the roof profile and slide the house downh He indicated they chatted with the Stachowiaks when
they visited and his objections are not about his view but that he wants a house that is sensitive to
the hillside and the neighbors. He asked that the Commission direct the applicant to go back and
respond to the points raised by the Design Review Committee. He suggested future homes be built
with gang driveways and garage loaded access. Mr. Buquet believed that whatever is approved
here will set the tone for development on all the other lots. He said this is the first house and it is on
a prime lot and will set the tone for future development.
There were no further public comments on this item.
Commissioner Fletcher noted that the Design Review Committee requested the applicant investigate
other options and the applicant chose not to make any changes or submit any additional infoffnation.
He was bothered that there was no response from the applicant. He felt the comment with respect
to this house setting the tone for future development was appropriate.. He thought moms work could
be done on the application and it may be a better project as a result. He agreed it is a unique ama.
He did not believe view is a big issue and he thought the uphill residents just have to accept the fact
that views will be impacted. He felt it is appropriate to build special homes in this amsa. Conversely,
he acknowledged this is a personal home for the applicant and they spent time and effort on how
they wanted it designed. He thought a little more work could be done and the application could
return to the Design Review Committee.
Commissioner McPhail stated she was on the Design Review Committee. She pointed out the
project fits within the Hillside standards and said .that was why the Committee did not mandate that
the roof be dropped. She said they asked the applicant to look at the idea for the sake of the
neighbors. She also noted the applicant indicated they designed the garage to have storage above
so that they wouldn't fill the garage with things and have to park their cars in the driveway.
Commissioner Stewart indicated she would like to ask the applicant a question regarding the 'l-foot
reduction.
Chairman Macias invited additional public comment.
Mr. Schneider said the berm is 25 feet at the middle of the lot and closer to 27 or 28 feet at the back.
He noted that moving the house back 5 feet only. lowered the house profile 1 foot but the driveway
becomes steeper. He also said that would move the bac, kyard into a steeper area of the lot. He
commented the applicants have three children. He stated the house appears to be a single story
from Camino predera and noted it is below the maximum height allowable.
Commissioner Stewart asked if changes could be made to the roof.
Mr. Schneider stated the roof pitch could be lowered to make the roof level with the roof over the
main part of the house. He said they tried a hip or hip and partial gable design and it destroyed the
design of the house. He reported this was the third design in 8 months. He said they looked at what
the Design Review Committee requested, but his clients did not like it. He commented that lots
range from 10 to 30 feet below the street level and said that the houses currently built are two-story
houses above the street, which this is not.
Mrs. Stachowiak observed their house gives the appearance of a single-story house, not a 2-story
house from Camino Predere. She did not feel it would give a corridor effect. She stated they airs
homeowners, not developers. She noted theirs is a small area beyond the deck that will give her a
small backyard for her children to play. She did not want to push the house back on the lot and force
her children to play in the front yard. She said she would like to enter on the first floor with her
Planning Commission Minutes -11- May 26, 2004
/?5
bedrooms above, but she will have to have the bedrooms below instead. She observed their first
step would be level with the sidewalk. She felt the neighbors are comparing her Iow-profile house to
three 2-story houses down the street. She said they did not submit the changes requested by the
Design Review Committee because they were not acceptable to them.
Commissioner Stewart agreed their ho.use us not like the others. She asked if they would be
agreeable to the change to the mofline.
Mr. Schneider stated the gable pitch could be changed to be in line with the rest of the roof.
Mrs. Stachowiak said she was not happy about such a change but was willing to do it to get her
house built.
Mrs. Messey stated that when the original 21-1ot project was approved, the Commission set a
standard and did not want 2-story houses.
Bred Buller, City Planner, commented there were two projects even before Concordia Homes. He
said it had always been staff's position that the design should start with a single stoP/massing from
the street and have the second story drop down the hill. He indicated staff does not feel it is
necessary to allow things above the garage, as the garege is the most predominant part of the house
from the street level. He remarked staff feels the storage could be in a variety of other places or it
could be scaled down a little to lower the view from the street. He noted that was a policy matter for
the commission to decide. He acknowledged the house as proposed complies with the technical
envelope of the Hillside Ordinance.
commissioner McNiel felt it was interesting that a custom lot subdivision is opposed as being
piecemeal development. He said previous developers told the City it was crazy to require
compliance with the Hillside Ordinance. He stated Concordia worked out a beautiful design but it
was obviously not financially feasible. He observed they own the lots and have the right to sell them
off for individual development. He agreed the standards need to be set now. He did not remember
the first three houses being processed. He felt this was an acceptable house. He noted the
applicant said they could drop the pitch on the garage roof to meet the balance of the roofline. He
supported the project and recommended the roofline be dropped.
Commissioner McPhail felt'it would be good to drop the roof pitch.
Commissioner Fletcher stated he had been bothered that the applicant was not willing to come back
to the Design Review Committee. He said the Committee works with developers in a give-and-take
fashion to come up with better projeCts, not to merely throw up roadblocks.
Commissioner Stewart felt the applicants were cooperative with the Design Review Committee. She
felt they listened to the committee but said this is their dream house and they have to live in it. She
appreciated their willingness to lower the roof over the garage and felt it is a nice compromise.
Chairman Macias felt the Design Review committee gave a mixed message by approving the project
but asking the applicant to investigate other options. He appreciated that the applicant looked at the
other options and thanked them for making the compromise.
Mr. Buller marked the desired height of the revised gable roof pitch to be sure staff knew what the
Commission and applicant were thinking. The Commission and applicant agreed.
Motion: Moved by McPhail, seconded by McNiel, to adopt the resolution approving Hillside Design
Review DRC2003-00961 with modification to require that the garage roof pitch be reduced to lower
the peak to the same height as the peak over the main portion of the house. Motion carded by the
following vote:
Planning Commission Minutes -12- May 26, 2004
AYES: FLETCHER, MACIAS McNIEL, McPHAIL, STEWART
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE - carded
DIRECTOR'S REPORTS
~RAM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2004/05
Jerry Dyer, Senior Civil Engineer presented the staff report and indicated Item '18
because it is the same as Item 10.
Commissioner McNiel noted that Item 23 calls for installing field lighting h School.
He questioned why the City is installing lights at the school.
Mr. Dyer responded there is a Joint Use Agreement.
Commissioner McNiel asked about the removal of the Route 66
Mr. Dyer responded the plans call for removal of the old installation of a pedestrian
bridge.
Commissioner Fletcher asked about work on the ; Trail.
Mr. Dyer responded Phase I is in the EIR phase ~ II is currently in design.
commissioner Fletcher noted that Items 56 and 58 are for installation of traffic signals at three
different intersections. He asked nines the criteria for installation.
Mr. Dyer replied
Dan James, Senior Civil tated that the number of accidents is also considered.
Chairman Macias was 3 see Item 5 calling for designing and constructing landscaping north
of the Metrolink tracks, very dusty there.
Mr. Dyer stated the, grant for a portion of this project.
Chairman who owns the land.
Mr. Dyer that the land is leased by the City from BNSF Railroad and Metrolink.
public comments but there were none.
Moved by McNiel, seconded by Stewart, to find the Capital Improvement Program in
~ce with the General Plan. Motion carded by the following vote:
FLETCHER, MACIAS, McNIEL, McPHAIL, STEWART
~IOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE - carded
Planning Commission Minutes -13- May 26, 2004
/7?
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, UPHOLDING THE ACTION OF THE
PLANNING COMMISSION AND APPROVING HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT
REVIEW DRC2003-00961, A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A 3,628
SQUARE FOOT SINGLE-FAMILY HOME ON LOT 12 OF TRACT 10035 IN
THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE),
LOCATED AT 8045 CAMINO PREDERA; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF- APN: 0207-631-02.
A. Recitals.
1. Mike and Wendy Stachowiak flied an application for the approval of Development
Review DRC2003-00961, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution,
the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application."
2. On the 26th day of May 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date by the
adoption of Resolution 04-69.
3. The decision represented by said Planning Commission Resolution was appealed in a
timely manner to this Council by Lynn and Renee Massey.
4. On July 7, 2004, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly
noticed public hearing on the application and continued the item to July 21, and August 18, 2004,
respectively.
5. All legal prerequisites pdor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A,
of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council dudng the
above-referenced public hearing on July 7, 21, and August 18, 2004, including written and oral staff
reports, the minutes of the aboveIreferenced Planning Commission meeting, and the contents of
Planning Commission Resolution No. 04~69, and togetherwith public testimony, this Council hereby
specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to property located at 8045 Camino Predera, with a street
frontage of 82 feet and lot depth of 181 feet; and
b. The subject property is on the downhill side of Camino Predera, with slope gradient
of approximately 20-30 percent, and is approximately 40 feet below street grade at the rear (south)
property line; and
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 04-**
DRC2003-00961 - STACHOWIAK
August18,2004
Page 2
c. The application proposes to construct a single-family house with the upper floor
level approximately matching the street grade of Camino Predera; and
d. The properties to the northeast have been developed with single-family homes.
The properties to the north, east, and west are presently vacant; and
e. The site is vacant and contains no vegetation other than native shrubs and grasses
with a row of mature Silk Oaks along the south property line; and
f. A 15-foot private drainage and equestrian easement exists along the rear of the site
that is shared equally with property owners to the north; and
g. The proposed development is consistent with single-family development in the area
(Tract 10035); and
h. The applicants are proposing to develop a 3628 square foot split level house on a
lot that is subject to the City's Hillside Development Regulations.
i. The applicants have met with staff and the appellants, and have agreed upon
revised plans allowing a maximum height of the roof to be no greater than 14 feet, 0-inches above
the street curb elevation.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-
referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above,
this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. The proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and
b. The proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and
the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and
c. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the
Development Code; and
d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be
detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
4. The Council hereby finds and determines that the project identified in this Resolution is
categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as
amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15303(a) of the State
CEQA Guidelines.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4, above,
this Council hereby denies the appeal, upholds the action of the Planning Commission, and
approves the application and the issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration subject to all
conditions of approval contained herein and in the Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No.
04-69 attached hereto.
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 04- **
DRC2003-00961 - STACHOWlAK
August 18, 2004
Page 3
Planninq Division
1 ) The maximum height of the roof shall not be greater than 14 feet,
0-inches above the street curb elevation. The revised site plan and
grading plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner
prior to the issuance of building permits.
6. This Council hereby provides notice to Lynn and Renee Massey, the appellants, and
Mike and Wendy Stachowiak, the applicants, that the time within which judicial review of the
decision represented by this Resolution must be sought is governed by the provisions of California
Cede of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6.
7. The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby directed to: (a) certify to the
adoption of this Resolution, and (b) forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified
mail, return-receipt requested, to Mike and Wendy Stachowiak and to Lynn and Renee Massey. at
the addresses identified in City records.
R A N C H O C U C a M O N G A
COMMUNITY SE I~VICE&
DATE: August 18, 2004
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director
Joe O'Neil, City Engineer
Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III
Karen McGuire-Emery, Senior Park Planner
SUBJECT: PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES
UPDATE
BACKGROUND
In accordance with the City Council's request to become more informed of park and recreation
facility issues, programs, projects and events, this report is provided to highlight pertinent
issues, projects and programs occurring in the Community Services Department and the Park
Design/Development and Maintenance Sections of Engineering and in the Planning Division.
A, PARKS AND FACILITIES UPDATE
Central Park:
Finished curb and gutter placement in the parking lots. Site concrete work underway in the
main area in front of the building. Metal framing inside the building is continuing. Continuing
work on the in-wall and overhead mechanical, electrical and plumbing. Lath work completed;
now working on plaster on the outside of the building. Fire sprinkler contractor prepared
drawings and is gearing up for fire sprinkler installation.
Central Park Landscape and Irrigation Project:
· All mainline trenches have been backfilled and work is beginning on the irrigation installation
along Base Line Road.
Rancho Cucamonga Cultural Center Parking Project:
· Work has been proceeding very well. Anticipate the last concrete pour for the East structure
spandrel walls to occur this Friday. Work is continuing on the elevator installations and both
sets of stairs have been completed. In addition, steel framing for the canopy and dome
structures has been completed. On the West Structure - work is proceeding on completing
the elevator installations, as well as color coating the exterior of the structure.
City Council
Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update
August 18, 2004
· Site improvements including rough grading and installation of the retaining wall footings for
the Cultural Center stairs has begun.
Rancho Cucamonga Cultural Center Project:
· On June 2, 2004, the City solicited bids for 15 of 26 contracts for the project. Bids for these
15 bid packages were received and opened on Tuesday, July 27, 2004. The structural steel
bid was awarded on August 4th and the remaining 14 bids are scheduled to be awarded on
August 18Th. The balance of the 11 bid packages is currently being reviewed for value
engineering cost savings and will be advertised and awarded at a later date.
Red Hill Park:
· Soccer field renovation is complete. Renovation included de-thatching and aerification of
fields, leveling Iow spots with sand, seeding and topdressing.
Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail
· The Master Plan was completed and adopted by City Council on December 6, 2000. Four
million dollars in Federal and State grant funds have been obtained. Phase I between
Haven and 1200 feet east of Etiwanda is still in Federal environmental review.
Environmental documents were resubmitted to Caltrans on July 21, 2004. Second plan
check completed on engineering construction design phase for Phase II between Amethyst
and Archibald.
Eflwanda Railway Station Property
· Master Plan was completed and adopted by City Council on December 6, 2000, that
identified the station as a "signature trailhead" high priority for the Pacific Electric Inland
Empire Trail. Fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) in Community Development Block Grant
funds was approved in FY 2004-2005, mostly for demolition of accessory structures on the
property. A conceptual site plan and community garden plan are complete. Architerra
agreed to donate their services to prepare community garden construction plans. Staff has
obtained estimates for HazMat clean up that SANBAG (property owner) agreed to pay for;
however, no action taken yet by SANBAG. Staff has met with a restaurateur interested in
leasing Station building for an upscale steakhouse; however, before proceeding, City
Council policy discussion needs to take place regarding desired uses for the property. If
City wishes to sublease the Station, or a portion of it, to a commercial business, then a
Request for Proposals should be issued.
B. COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE
Senior Services:
· Hawaiian Luau, Thursday, August 19, 10:00 a.m. Please join us for our "vacation" to the
sandy beaches of Hawaii. The event includes refreshments, entertainment and door prizes.
We will set the mood through decorations and music - you can complete it by wearing your
favorite beach attire! This event is co-sponsored by the V.I.P. Club.
City Council
Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update
August 18, 2004
,, Senior Advisory Committee - Due to senior vacations, there will not be a meeting during the
month of August. The next regular meeting of the Committee will take place on Monday,
September 27th, at 9:00 a.m. at the Senior Center.
Senior Transportation:
· During the second quarter of 2004 (April, May and June) 2,710 rides were provided for
seniors through the YMCNCity sponsored transportation program. Monthly miles dudng the
same reporting period averaged 1,677. On-going challenges for the program continue to be
getting seniors to call for service the day before needed and the cost of fuel (approximately
$600/month).
Human Services:
· Homeowners and Renters Rebate - Volunteers from AARP are preparing homeowners and
renters rebate forms for all members of the community on Tuesdays, from 12:00 - 3:00
p.m., through August 31st. Appointments are not necessary; interested community members
will be assisted on a first come, first served basis. Please call (909) 477-2780 for more
information.
· ClearView 500 Maqnifyinq Machine - The Senior Center received the Clear View machine
from the State of California Department of Rehabilitation. This helpful device provides
assistance to visually impaired seniors and is used to magnify letters, books, text and
pictures. The machine is available for use Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00
p.m. Saturday and/or Sunday hours vary and community members are urged to call the
Senior Center to verify availability.
· The Alzheimer's Association Safe Return Program assists in the safe and timely return of
individuals with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias for those who leave their
residence and become lost. The Senior Center is a registration site and can provide the
following benefits: identification products, national information/photo database, a 24 hour
toll-free crisis line, fax alert notification system, local Alzheimer's association chapter support
and wandering behavior information/training.
· Manicures & Pedicures - Seniors can rejuvenate with a manicure, pedicure or both at the
Senior Center. Services are pedormed by licensed and trained staff using only the highest
quality hand and foot care products. Services are available by appointment only. Call the
Senior Center at 477-2780 to make an appointment. Cost: $10.00 for a Pedicure and $8.00
for a Manicure.
Trips and Tours:
· "Bye Bye Birdie" & Buffet Lunch at the Lawrence Welk Resort and Theater, August 21,
2004. We'll start with a buffet lunch and then off to enjoy "Bye Bye Birdie". This play
canters on Conrad Birdie, an Elvis Presley-type rock 'n' roll star who is drafted into the Army,
much to the horror of his broke agent, Albert Peterson. In an attempt to get some publicity to
get rich and marry his sweetheart, Rose, Albert makes arrangements for Conrad to appear
on "The Ed Sullivan Show," where he will give his last kiss as a civilian to a girl. The lucky
recipient, Klm, is selected from Conrad's fan club and the group sets out to Sweet Apple,
Ohio, to meet her, much to the dismay of Kim's new boyfriend, Hugo. Relationships begin to
City Council
Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update
August 18, 2004
unravel as Rose gets impatient with Albert, and the jealous Hugo knocks Conrad out cold
during the televised kiss. Cost: $65.00 per person.
Volunteer Services:
· The table below summarizes the Community Services Department's volunteer usaqe for the
month of June 2004 and year-to-date:
Month: June 2004 YEAR TO DATE
~ of ~ of
Volunteers ~ of Hours $ Value Volunteers ~ of Hours iValue
Admin 5 15 210 25 75 1050
Sports 192 1,492 20,888 930 7,839 109,746
Seniors & 63 911 12,753 382 3,358 47,011
Human
Services
Special 0 0 0 88 453 6,342
Events
Youth 58 100.5 1,407 360 888 12,432
Programs
based on $14.00/hour
Teens:
· The table below summarizes teen proqram participation for the month of July 2004:
Program Attendance/Participation - July 2004
Teen Center 1,280
Homework Room 48
TRAC - Babysitting 14 participants
TRAC - Snack Bars 141 volunteers/51.5 volunteer hours
Spruce Skate Facility 1,000
Summer Volunteen Connection 30 volunteers; 790 volunteer hours
Teen Self Defense Workshop 6 participants/2 hours '
Teen Trips 78 participants
· The Teen Center began its summer hours of operation on June 21st and will continue
extended hours through September 3, 2004. During this timeframe the Center will be open
from 11:00 a.m. until 6:00 p.m. Monday through Thursday and from 11:00 a.m. until 8:00
p.m. on Friday. The summer drop-in fee is $2.00 per day (non-residents pay an additional
$5.00 non-resident fee per quarter).
· TRAC teens with our summer snack bars have gotten off to a great start. Many of our
volunteers are new and are highly motivated. TRAC teens will be working the snack bars at
our Movies in the Park, Concerts in the Park and swim programs.
City Council
Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update
August 18, 2004
· Spruce Park Skate Facility continues to be a hub of activity. Staff meets with the local
skaters on the first Thursday of each month and updates them on the latest safety
awareness laws, upcoming events and discusses facility issues.
· Summer Volunteen Connection is a demanding but rewarding job. Our volunteers work with
children ages 2-12 in a variety of our summer programs such as day camp, sport camp, play
camp, kid explorers, the mobile recreation program and Movies and Concerts in the Park.
Participants have gone through an interview and training program before being placed in our
programs. The Volunteen Connection is a great job preparation tool for teens getting ready
for their first paying job.
· Teen Trips began during the week of July 12t~ and will take place every Wednesday through
August 11th. Trip locations include: Pharaoh's Lost Kingdom, Universal Studios, Knott's
Berry Farm, Magic Mountain, Disneyland and our week long summer camping trip to
Campland on the Bay in San Diego takes place at the end of August for youngsters in 6th
through 12th grade.
· The "REAL" Action Committee was developed this past spring to get high school students
involved in sharing their ideas to expand age appropriate teen programs. REAL is an
acronym that stands for: Rancho Cucamonga, Etiwanda, Alta Loma and Los Osos High
Schools. The Committee meets monthly and has been working on several program ideas
including movies in the park as a special event for teens and a quarterly dance/club night.
Teens participating are excited about making a difference in their community.
Youth Activities:
· Our Playcamp registration for the summer session is currently at 507 students enrolled in 30
classes. Waiting lists exist for many of our Playcamp programs.
· Over three hundred (300+) children were served during the past month at our 5 regular park
stops. During the summer months (July 12th through August 13th) the schedule for our
Mobile Recreation proqram, "Fun on the Run" is as follows:
Weekday Park Location Timeframe
Mond ay EI lena Pa rk 11:00 am- 3:00 pm
Tuesday Old Town Park 11:00 am - 3:00 pm
Wednesday Heritage Park 11:00 am - 3:00 pm
Thursday Mountain View Park 11:00 am - 3:00 pm
Friday Windrows Park 11:00 am - 3:00 pm
Lewis Partnership:
· In conjunction with the Lewis Apartment Communities, the Community Services Department
is continuing to operate a Teen Center pro.qram at the Sycamore Apartments. This program
runs Monday through Friday from 3:00 p.m. until 5:00 p.m. for youngsters, ages 6 to 12. A
Kids Club meets Monday through Friday at the Del Mar Apartment Complex and Tuesday
and Thursday at, either the Moniceto, Carmel, Evergreen or Terra Vista Apartments, in the
Terra Vista community (dates and locations are on an alternating schedule). The Kids Club
City Council
Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update
August 18, 2004
meets from 3:00 p.m. until 5:00 p.m. for children ages 5-11. The Lewis Corporation provides
funding for these valuable community youth programs without impact to the City's budget.
Youth Sports:
· The next Sports Advisory Committee meeting will take place on October 13th. At this
meeting the groups will be turning in their spring/summer 2005 field allocation requests.
· The table below summarizes youth sports activities for the reporting period:
Activity # Participants Age/Gender # Teams
Pee Wee Soccer 320 3-5/boys & girls 62
Youth Basketball 935 6-16/boys & girls 104
Youth Volleyball Camp 40 8-14/boys & girls N/A
Youth Soccer Camp 40 6-14/boys & girls N/A
Youth Basketball Camp 40 6-14/boys & girls N/A
Cucamonga Middle School - 35 6-13/boys & girls N/A
Youth Sports Camp
Cucamonga Middle School 20 8-adult N/A
(CMS) Judo
Cucemonga Middle School 35 8-14/boys & girls 4
(CMS) Youth Basketball Practice
Northtown Youth Basketball 59 6-17/boys & girls 6
Northtown Pee Wee Baseball 13 3-5/boys & girls 2
Northtown Play Camp 23 6-13/boys & girls N/A
Northtown Recreation Classes 26 6-15/boys & girls N/A
Learn to Swim Aquatics 670 6months-adult N/A
Program
RC Family Sports Center:
· The table below provides drop-in/open play participation at the Center for the reporting
period:
Activity # Participants
Adult Basketball 393
Youth Basketball 811
Adult Racquetball 289
Youth Racquetball 87
Adult Volleyball 29
Youth Volleyball 15
Jazzercise 1,120
· The table below summarizes organized adult activity at the Sports Center during the
reporting period:
Activity # Participants Age/Gender # Teams
Racquetball 24 Adult/Male & Females N/A
Basketball (full court) 120 Adult/Males 12
Basketball (3-on-3) 60 Adult/Males 12
City Council
Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update
August 18, 2004
Adult Sports:
· Thirty-six (36) adults are participating in our tennis leaques.
· The table below summarizes adult sports activities at the Epicenter for the reporting pedod:
Activity # Participants # Teams Gender
Softball 2,640 165 Males/Females
Soccer 672 42 Males/Females
Flag Football 60 6 Males
Non-Profit Sports Organizations:
· Bi-annually, the Community Services Department, through the Sports Advisory Committee
allocates sport fields for non-profit orqanized youth sport leaques. For the reporting period,
10 non-profit sport groups utilized 18 City parks and had 59,907 participants and spectators
enjoying our parks during both practices and game times.
Special Events:
· Our Concerts in the Park series began on July 7~. Concerts have taken place on Thursday
evenings from July 8t~ and will continue through August 26~ at the Red Hill Community Park
Amphitheater. All concerts start at 7:00 p.m. The lineup for the remaining 2-weeks of
entertainment includes:
August 19"~ The Fenians (Irish Rock)
August 26"~ The Answer (Classic Rock)
Food vendors, everything from BBQ, Mexican food to delicious deserts, (funnel cake and
kettle corn) will be available starting at 6:00 p.m.
· Our Movies in the Park series started up in July. Movies have been shown at Milliken Park
on Monday evenings, Windrows Park on Wednesday evenings and Red Hill Community
Park on Friday evenings and will continue through August 20~. All movies start at dusk. Our
last movie of the summer series is Finding Nemo (Rated G). Snack items will be available
for purchase courtesy of our TRAC program.
· Staff is currently creating and programming our upcoming events for 2004/2005. These
include: Central Park Dedication/Grand Opening, Harvest Carnival, Snow Day, and the
Holiday Tree Lighting.
Performing and Cultural Arts:
· The City's summer Community Theatre production of "The Music Man" closed on July 18th
after six well-attended performances presented at the new Los Osos High School Theatre.
The cast of 85 members of varying ages sung and danced their hearts out to the familiar
tunes of Meredith Wilson and entertained nearly 1,800 audience members who attended the
production. Ticket sales showed a large increase in senior citizen attendance, contributed
largely to their attraction to an ali-American, old-fashioned Broadway musical and increased
marketing efforts to that segment of the population.
City Council
Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update
August 18, 2004
With an average attendance of approximately 300 per performance, "The Music Man"
exceeds all previous average attendance figures of our community theatre productions, with
the single exception of the City's highly successful production of "Joseph and the Amazing
Technicolor Dreamcoat" this past spring that averaged approximately 440 per performance.
The City's production of "The Music Man" received favorable reviews and feature stories in
the Daily Bulletin, RC Voice and ReviewPlays.com, a new Los Angeles based on-line review
site.
Park and Facilities:
· The table below and on the next page provides usage information for park picnic shelters
and special use facilities for the month of June 2004.
Location/Facility Attendance Number of Number Hours of Use
Applications of
Processed Rentals
Red Hill Community Park Picnic 3,240 43 60 209
Shelters
Heritage Community 1,887 28 35 121
Park Picnic Shelters
Hermosa Park Picnic Shelter 473 16 19 70
Milliken Park Picnic Shelter 590 22 23 116
Coyote Canyon Picnic Shelter 285 10 12 42
Civic Center Courtyard* 0 0 0 0
Amphitheater 0 0 0 0
Equestrian 200 5 11 21
* The Civic Center is not available for public rental due to the Cil's construction project,
Heritage Park Equestrian Center:
· Equestrian Center usa.qe for the month of Auqust 2004 is shown in the table below.
Group Date Event/Time Frame
Alta Loma Riding Club August 5~ Board Meeting/7:00 pm-8:30 pm
Equestrian Patrol August 12~ Meeting/6:00 pm-9:00 pm
Alta Loma Riding Club August 17~ Membership Meeting/7:00 pm-8:30 pm
Alta Loma Riding Club August 21st Playday/4:00 pm-10:00 pm
4-H Club August 30~ Ice Cream Social/6:00 pm - 8:00 pm
Facilities:
· The table below displays buildinq rentals and recreation contract class attendance numbers
for the month of July 2004.
Activity Program Numbers July Attendance
Lions East Rentals 73 bookings 150
Lions East Building 552 facility hours 3,755
Lions West Rentals 115 bookings 3,595
Lions West Building 584 facility hours 5,474
City Council
Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update
August 18, 2004
· Two hundred and eighty-five (285) recreation classes are being offered during the summer.
· Staff is continuing to meet quarterly with users of the Equestrian Center to address
maintenance needs and programming. Our local groups are very cooperative and
supportive of the City's efforts.
· Park monitors keep daily reports of activities in our parks, often helping out residents in
need of assistance.
DepaAmental I City Marketing:
· Marketing efforts continue being implemented for the promotion of the Victoria Gardens
Cultural Center and the Promotinq Arts and Literacy (PAL) fundraising campaign.
· The second in a series of 7 Central Park Bookmarks has been printed and distributed.
Barnhart Construction, the Central Park contractor provided a financial sponsorship in
support of this project. Distribution of the 20,000 bookmarks continues at the checkout
desks at the Library, reception desks at our Community Centers and through a partnership
with the local Barnes and Noble bookstore.
· The August issue of the Central Park Newsletter is now available for download by the
community.
· A commercial for the Mark Christopher Charity Classic has been edited to reflect actual
construction footage of several key projects such as the Victoria Gardens shopping district,
Central Park, Town Square and Foothill Crossing. These were premiered at the August '16th
Media Sponsored Day reception.
Park and Recreation Commission:
· The next meeting of the Park and Recreation Commission is scheduled for August 19, 2004.
At this meeting the following items are scheduled to be discussed/acted upon by the
Commission:
Update on Senior Advisory Committee.
Update on Sports Advisory Committee.
Update on Central Park Project.
Update on Victoria Gardens Cultural Center Project.
Consideration of a recommendation from the Sports Advisory Committee regarding
Pony Baseball's request for allocation of fields and membership in the Sports
Advisory Committee.
>' Consideration of issues and options associated with vehicular parking on residential
streets near Heritage Park.
> Review of existing Park Master Plan relating to sports complexes.
Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation:
· With the recent restructuring of The Rancho Cucamon.qa Community Foundation, the
Foundation's Board of Directors will meet three times per year: in February, June and
October on the second Wednesday of the month at 5:00 p.m. Therefore the next
City Council
Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update
August 18, 2004
regularly scheduled meeting of the Community Foundation's Board of Directors will take
place on October 13th. items currently agendized for this meeting include:
A guest speaker on the arts/fundraising.
Update on Victoria Gardens Cultural Center project.
New member orientation.
Appointment of Committee members to the Finance, Fund Development and
Membership/Nominating Committees.
> Foundation Members update and discussion on accomplishment of goals for the PAL
Campaign.
· The Executive Committee of the Foundation, comprised of the President, Vice-President and
Chairs of the Finance, Fund Development and Membership/Nominating Committees, will meet
quarterly in March, June, September, December on the second Wednesday of the month at 9:00
a.m. The next meeting of the Executive Committee is scheduled for September 8th. At this
meeting the following items will be discussed:
> Foundation Members update and discussion on accomplishment of goals for the PAL
Campaign.
Update on Victoria Gardens Cultural Center project.
Updates on Board subcommittees.
Consideration of additional appointments to the Foundation Board of Directors.
· The President of the Community Foundation and two Boardmembers will continue attending PAL
Campaiqn Cabinet meetings on the first Wednesday of the month at 4:00 p.m. Cabinet meetings
are held with peers on the Library Foundation to coordinator the operations of the PAL Campaign.
The next meeting of the PAL Campaign Cabinet is scheduled for September 1st.
Respectfully submitted,
Kevin McArdle
Community Services Director City Planner
htCOMMSERVtCouncil&Board$[CJtyCouncil~taffRepo/t$~2OO4~updateS. 18,04. d0c