Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout91-359 - Resolutions RESOLUI~ONNO. 91-359 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OOUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO ~, CALIFORNIA, D~TfING VICIOR/A PLANNED CC~9~3NITY ~ 91-03, SUBAREA E, A Pd~QU~"T TO AM~qD THE VICTORIA ~ ~ IAND USE MAP FR~4 M~Di-t~ RESID~PIAL (8- 14 ~I.TNG UNITS PER' ACRE) TO I3C~~ RESID~AL (4-8 DWi.LING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 10.1 ACRES OF LAND IDCAT~D ON THE FAST SIDE OF M/I.T.IK~ AV~f~E SOUTH OF THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RA]7;~OAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN ~ ~F - APN: Pf~TTON OF 227-691-01 A. Recitals. (i) On May 20, 1981, the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved the enactment of the Victoria Planned C~,~nity through the adoption of Ordinance No. 143. (ii) On August 5, 1991, the City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Victoria Planned C~m~nity Amendment No. 91-03, Subarea E, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Victoria Planned C~.~,unity Amendment is referred to as "the application." (iii) On October 9, 1991, the Planning C~m~dssion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and following the conclusion of said public hearing, adopted Resolution No. 91-154 rec~,u~~ to the City Council that the application be denied. (iv) On November 20, 1991, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing prior to the adoption of this Resolution. (v) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, ~/~EREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determine, and resolve as follc~s: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-refer~ public hearing on November 20, 1991, including written ar~ oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to 10.1 acres of land located on the east side of Milliken Avenue south of the Southern Pacific Railroad right- of-way and is presently undeveloped. Said pro~ is currently designated Med~__ium R~sidential (8-14 dwelling units per acre); and Resolution No. 91-359 Page 2 (b) The property to the north of the subject site, past the Southern Pacific RaiLroad right-of-way, is designated Low Residential (2-4 dwelling unite per acre) and is developed with single family residences; the property to the south is designated Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) and is vacant; the property to the east is designated Low- Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with single family residences under construction; and the property to the west is designated Park and is vacant; and (c) This amendment conflicts with the Ta~d Use Policies of the General Plan and Victoria Planned Community and will not provide for develop- ment, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and (d) This amendment does not promote the goals and objectives of the Tand Use Element; and (e) The properties located in Subarea E of the application are not suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district and are not compatible with existing and adjacent land use designations as evidenced by the location of the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way to the north and tb~ properties' close proximity to the intersection of Milliken Avenue and Base Line Road, which are major arterials; and (f) ~ amendment would not have a significant impact on the env~t nor on the surrounding properties as evidenced by the findings and conclusions listed in Parts I and II of the Initial Study; and 3. This Council hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Council hereby issues a Negative Declaration. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Council hereby resolves to deny Victoria Planned C~t.,~nity Amendment 91-03, Subarea E, amending the Victoria Planned C~,.~,~nity ~and Use Map from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low- Med~ium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for 10.1 acres of land located on the east side of Milliken Avenue south of the Southern Pacific · Railroad right-of-way as shown in Exhibit "A." 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASS~D, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 20th day of November, 1991. AYES: Alexander, Buquet, Williams NOES: Stout, Wright ABS~T: None Resolution No. 91-359 Page 3 Dennis L. Stout~ Mayor D~hra J. A~, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY ~.FRK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted_ by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 20th day of Nove~er, 1991. Executed this 21st day of November, 1991 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. 'De~ J. ~a~, City Clerk Resolution No. 91-359 Page 4 HIGHLAND AVENUE BASE LINE ROAD EXHIBIT 'A'