HomeMy WebLinkAbout91-200 - Resolutions RESOLUTION NO. 91-200
A RESOLUI~ON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITy OF RANCHO
CU~, CALIFORNIA, DENYING FOOTHILL BOULEVARD
SPtDCIFIC PLAN ~ 91-02, SUBAREA 1, A R~ TO
AMEND THE ~I. BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE MAP
FROM MSDIUM RESID~N'UIAL (8-14 DWF~I.~G UNITS PER ACRE) TO
I/YW MEDIUM RESIDUalS/AL (4-8 DW~IING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR
APPROXIMATELY 14.20 ACRES OF LAND BORDERED ON THE NORi~
BY ~ BOULEVARD, ON THE EAST BY THE EASTERN CITY
~, ON THE SOUTH BY EXISTING IDW MEDIUM RESIDENT/AL
DESIGNATED 1AND, AND ON THE WEST BY A UTILITY CORRIDOR,
AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THERSDF - APN: 229-041-10
A. Recitals.
(i) On September 16, 1987, the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga approved the enactment of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan
through adoption of Resolution No. 87-505.
(ii) On March 15, 1991, the City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an
application for Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment No. 91-02 as
described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution,
the subject Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the
application."
(iii) On May 22, 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and
following the conclusion of said hearing, adopted Resolution No. 91-57
rec~u~ndingtothe City Council that said application bedenied.
(iv) On July 17, 1991, the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga held a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing prior
to its adoption of this Resolution.
(v) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does
hereby find, determine and resolve as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifies and finds that all of the facts set
forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during
the above-referenced public hearing on July 17, 1991, including written and
oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby
specifically finds as follows:
Resolution No. 91-200
Page 2
(a) This amendment may conflict with the Land Use Policies of
the General Plan and the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and may not provide
for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General
Plan and with related development; and
(b) This amendment may not promote the goals and objectives of
the Land Use Element; and
(c) That the property located in Subarea 1 of the application
is not suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district due to the
subject property's potential incompatibility with existing and surrounding
land uses as evidenced by the site's being bordered on the north by a major
arterial road; and
(d) That the proposed amendment would not have significant
impacts on the envirorm~nt nor on the surrounding properties as evidenced by
the findings and conclusions listed in Parts I and II of the Initial Study but
that land use incompatibilities may result; and
(e) That the proposed amendment may not be in conformance with
the General Plan and the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan due to the potential
to establish ~tible land use relationships with single family uses and
significant traffic activity.
3. This Council hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and
considered in cc~liance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970
and, further, this Council does not issue a Negative Declaration because the
land use change may not pro~Dte the goals and objectives of the General Plan.
4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs
1, 2, and 3 above, this Council hereby denies Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan
Amendment No. 91-02, Subarea 1, a request to amend the Foothill Boulevard
Specific Plan Tand Use Map from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per
acre) to Low Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for approxi-
mately 14.20 acres of land bordered on the north by Foothill Boulevard, on the
east by the eastern city limits, on the south by existing Low Medium
Residential designated land, and on the west by a utility corridor, as shown
on Exhibit "Al."
5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
PASS~D, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 17th day of July, 1991.
AYES: Alexander, Buquet, Stout, Williams
NOES: None
ABS~I~T: Wright
Resolution No. 91-200
Page 3
D~ra J. A~s, city Ci~
I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CY.FRK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed,
approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 17th day of
July, 1991.
Executed this 18th day of July, 1991 at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
De~ra J. Ad__~, City Clerk
Resolution No. 91-200 Page 4
VICTOIIA
' VL //'
V L I ~' ~: ../
Etiwanda Specific Plan
Amendments 91-03
Foothill Blvd. Specific Plan
Amendments 91-02
LM
llll - Di~tei~t Dee~Bnation
L~ PROPERTIES CURR[#TLY
DESI~IIATED ll[I)lUId
RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DIELLING
UI~S PER ACRE) UIIDER
OOlIS~(RATI~ FOR REDESIG#A'rlON
1'0 LOll IEI}IIIll RE~IOENTIAL
[4-8 DIELLIRG I#flT§ PER ACRE}
OP LMJ [~1
- ESPA Subarea Nos.
I - FSPA Subarea Nee.
C