Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout91-199 - Resolutions RESOIITI~ON NO. 91-199 A RESOI/3TION OF %}{E CITY COUNCIL OF TH~ CITY OF RANCHO CLI?AMONGA, CALIFORNIA, D~ffING G~INq~RAL PlAN ~ 91-02B, SUBAREA 1, A Pd~XlEST TO AMEND THE Gt~Nq~RAL PLAN IAND USE MAP FRC~ M~DIL~ RESIDENT/AL (8-14 DW~.LING UNITS PER ACRE) TO IDW M~DII~ RESIDenT/AL (4-8 DW~,T.~ UNITS PER ACRE) FOR APPROXIMATELY 14.20 ACRES OF 1AND BORDERt~ ON THE NORPH BY ~ BOULEVARD, ON THE EAST BY THE RESID~IYITAL DESIGNATED 1AND, AND ON THE WEST BY A UTTLITY CORRIDOR, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT %KSRtI)F - APN: 229-041-10 A. Recitals. (i) On April 6, 1981, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved the enactment of the General Plan through the adoption of Resolution No. 81-40. (ii) On March 15, 1991, the City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for General Plan Amendment No. 91-02B as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." (iii) On May 22, 1991 and continued to May 29, 1991, the Planning C~u~,~ssion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and following the conclusion of said public hearing, adopted Resolution No. 91-56 reco~-~-~nding to the City Council that said application be denied. (iv) On July 17, 1991, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing prior to its adoption of this Resolution. (v) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determine and resolve as follows: 1. ~1~is Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the R~citals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing on July 17, 1991, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: Resolution No. 91-199 Page 2 (a) Subarea 1 of the application applies to approximately 14.20 acres of land bordered on the north by Foothill Boulevard, on the east by the eastern City limits, on the south by existing Low Medium Residential designated land, and on the west by a utility corridor and is presently undeveloped. Said property is currently designated as Medium R~sidential (8-14 dwelling units per acre); and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is designated Neighborhood C~m~rcial and is vacant. The property to the west is designated Flood Control/Utility Corridor. The property to the east is designated utility corridor in the County of San Bernardino. The property to the south is designated Low M~dium Residential and is vacant; and (c) This amendment may conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and may not provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and (d) This amendment may not promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and (e) That the property located in Subarea 1 of the application is not suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district due to the subject property's potential incompatibility with existing and surrounding land uses as evidenced by the site's being bordered on the north by a major arterial road; and (f) That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor on the surrotunding properties as evidenced by the findings and conclusions listed in Parts I and II of the Initial Study but that land use incc~patibilities may result; and (g) That the proposed amendment may not be in conformance with the General Plan due to the potential to establish incompatible land use relationships with single family uses and significant traffic activity. 3. This Council hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Council does not issue a Negative Declaration because the land use change may not promote the goals and objectives of the General Plan. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragrat~hs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Council hereby denies General Plan Amendment No. 91-02B, Subarea 1, a request to amend the General Plan Land Use Map frc~ Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low Medium (4-8 dwelling unite per acre) for approximately 14.20 acres of land bordered on the north by Foothill Boule, on the east by the eastern city limits, on the south by existing Low M~dium residential designated land, and on the west by a utility corridor, as shown on Exhibit "A." 5. ~ne City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. Resolution No. 91-199 Page 3 PASS~D, APPRDV~I), and ADOPTED this 17th day of July, 1991. AYES: Alexander, Buquet, Stout, Williams NOES: None Dennis L. Stout, Mayor D~bra J. Ad~s, City Clerk -- I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CI.ERK of the City of Rancho O/ca~onga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 17th day of July, 1991. Executed this 18th day of July, 1991 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. ~, City Clerk Resolution No. 91-199 Page 4 V~CT0~A ~ :jr.hi.'Ich~ VL : ' ' ~ -- 4, :, , . ~ ,: .' _/.. .. Etiw~nd~ A~ General Plan Amendmentl 91-02B , LM - Llfld U~e Designitio~ PROPERTIES CU~ENTLT RESIdEnTIAL (I-14 UNITS PER ACRE) UNDER Off. TO LOI E~IUI KSID[NTIAL LM (4-1 DIELLING UNITS PER ACRE) ~ I - Sub~fe~ plrk ITEM: GPA 91-02B CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PL,"~\'NI NO DIVISION TrTLE:G...,., EXqqIBFF: "a' SCALE: ~, · ~,=