HomeMy WebLinkAbout91-198 - Resolutions RESOIlrfION NO. 91-198
A RESOIJ3TION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
ClXlAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ~ B(XILEVARD
SPECIFIC PLAN AMEN/kMflqT 91-03 AMfl~DING THE ~
~ SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE MAP FRC~ MfDIt~
RESIDflgTIAL (8-14 UWF[.T.TNG UNITS PER ACRE) TO A ~
C~v~4~RClAL DESIGNATION WITH A MASTER PLAN Pd~Q~ FOR
2.0 ACRES OF LAND LOCATf~ ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF
~.L BO~ AND ~A AVfNUE, AND MAK/]gG
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THERfDF - APN: 1100-161-02
A. Recitals.
(i) On September 16, 1987, the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga approved the enactment of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan
through adoption of Rmsolution No. 87-505.
(ii) On November 15, 1990, Planning Network, on behalf of Charles V.
Cummins, filed an application for Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment
No. 91-03, requesting a Conmunity Co~-~rcial land use designation for the
subject property as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in
this Resolution, the subject Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment is
referred to as "the application."
(iii) on May 22, 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and
following the conclusion of said public hearing, adopted Resolution No. 91-53
rec~u~JKting to the City Council that said application be approved and a
Negative Declaration be certified.
(iv) on July 17, 1991, the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga held a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing prior
to its adoption of this Resolution.
(v) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does
hereby find, determine and resolve as follows:
1. ~nis Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set
forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during
the above-referenced public hearing on July 17, 1991, including written and
oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby
specifically finds as follows:
Resolution No. 91-198
Page 2
(a) The application applies to approximately 2.0 acres of land
located on the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue with
a street frontage of 630 feet and is presently developed with a vacant service
station. Said property is currently designated Medium ~sidential (8-14
dwelling units per acre); and
(b) The property to the north of the subject site is designated
Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and is underdeveloped with a
single family home. The property to the south is designated Cuit. t,unity
C~t,[L~_rcial and is undeveloped. The property to the east is designated Medium
Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with an existing,
non-conforming market. The property to the west is designated C~tm~unity
C~m~rcial and is developed with a vacant market and motel; and
(c) This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies
of the General Plan or the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and will provide
for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General
Plan and With related development; and
(d) This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the
Land Use Element; and
(e) That the subject property is suit~_ble for the proposed
specific plan designation of Con~¥unity Col,~t~rcial as evidenced by the site's
being in close proximity to properties on the west and south which have
C~tutt.lnity OJ~t~t~rcial land use designations; and
(f) That the proposed amendment would not have significant
impacts on the environm~_nt nor on the surrounding properties as evidenced by
the findings and conclusions listed in Parts I and II of the Initial Study of
this application and of General Plan Amendment 90-02B and that the issuance of
a Negative Declaration is appropriate; and
(g) That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the
General Plan, the Development Code, and the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan.
3. This Council hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and
considered in c~t~liance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970
and, further, this Council hereby issues a Negative Declaration.
4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs
1, 2, and 3 above, this Council hereby approves Foothill Boulevard Specific
Plan Amendment No. 91-03, amending the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Land
Use Map from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to a C~mtt~nity
C~mt~rcial designation with a Master Plan requirement for 2.0 acres of land
located on the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue, as
shown on Exhibit "A."
5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
Resolution No. 91-198
Page 3
PASS~D, APPROVED, and ADOPTSD this 17th day of July, 1991.
AYES: Alexander, Buquet, Stout, Williams
NOES: None
ABSS~T: Wright
De]bra J. A~, City Clerk
I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLRJ~K of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed,
approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, at a rec3ular meeting of said City Council held on the 17th day of
July, 1991.
Executed this 18thday of July, 1991 at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
'D~bra J. A~, City Clerk
Resolution No. 91-198
Page 4
,-.
,~, ir.h h. YL ;' L ." -- /
VL '~ : ."
I ETIIANOA AREA
GENERAL PLAN AMENOIIENT~
LM LM
I [] PII'OPERTE$ CUItllENi'L¥
DESIGNATED MEDIUM
RESIDENTIAL (I-14 OIELLING
UNITS PER ACRE) UNDER
CONSIOERATIO# FOR
1'0 LOI NEDIUM RESIOENTIAL
(4-1 DIELLING UNITS PER ACRE)
Off. LM
el®m, '""
LM
~PA SI-OIA (FSPA g1-03)
aClUeSt to change land use GPA 90-02B {FSPA gO-03)
signation from Medium Reque~ lo change the land use
sidential to Commercial designation from Medium
Reaidential to Commercial