HomeMy WebLinkAbout1998/12/02 - Agenda PacketCITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
REGULAR MEETINGS
1 st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:00 p.m.
December 2,1998
Civic Center
Council Chambers
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
City Councilmembers
William J. Alexander, Mayor
Diane Williams, Mayor Pro Tern
Paul Biane, Councilmember
James V. Curatalo, Councilmember
Bob Dutton, Councilmember
Jack Lam, City Manager
James L. Markman, City Attorney
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk
City Office: 477-2700
City Council Agenda
December 2, 1998
All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing.
The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, one
week prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such
items.
A. CALL TO ORDER
Pledge of Allegiance.
Roll Call: Alexander Biane ~
Curatalo , Dutton__
and Williams
B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
Presentation of a Proclamation to Assemblyman Fred Aguiar.
C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
This is the time and place for the general public to address the City
Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any
issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may
receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.
Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual.
D. CONSENTCALENDAR
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and
non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time
without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember
or member of the audience for discussion.
1. Approval of Minutes: October 21, 1998
November 4, 1998
Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 11/11/98 and 11/18/98 and
Payroll ending 11/10/98 for the total amount of $1,495,505.13.
Approval of a Resolution to adopt new trust requirements under
the Small Business Job Protection Act.
RESOLUTION NO. 98-211
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING NEW TRUST
REQUIREMENTS UNDER THE SMALL
BUSINESS JOB PROTECTION ACT FOR THE
CITY'S DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
10
11
City Council Agenda
December 2, 1998
2
Approval to appropriate $191,736.00 from Trust Account Fund No.
70-276-477 for undergrounding of the existing overhead utility
lines along Highland Avenue east of Eftwanda Avenue in
conjunction with Freeway Utility Relocation Project.
Approval of the Improvement Agreement and Improvement
Security for street improvements at model site related to Tentative
Tract 15072, generally located at the southwest corner of
Rochester Avenue and Base Line Road, submitted by Lewis
Development Co.
RESOLUTION NO. 98-212
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENTAND IMPROVEMENTSECURITY
FOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS AT MODEL
SITE, RELATED TO TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
15072
27
28
30
E. CONSENT ORDINANCES
The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first
reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non-
controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time
without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be
removed for discussion.
CONSIDERATION TO AMEND CITY ORDINANCE NO. 522 IN
ORDER TO DELETE THE MANDATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR
THE PROVISION OF TELECOMMUTING CENTERS AND ON-
SITE VIDEO CONFERENCE FACILITIES. AND THAT NEW
HOMES AND OFFICE BUILDINGS BE CONDITIONED TO BE
EQUIPPED WITH CATEGORY 5 TELEPHONE CABLE OR FIBER
OPTIC CABLE AS APPROPRIATE
ORDINANCE NO. 522 A (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT
CODE AMENDMENT 98-03, AMENDING
CHAPTERS 1708 AND 17.10 OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE, REGARDING
TRIP REDUCTION REQUIREMENTS, AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
31
City Council Agenda
December 2, 1998
3
APPROVAL OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 10.68
OF TITLE 10 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL
CODE PERTAINING TO THE USE OF SPRUCE AVENUE PARK
SKATE FACILITY
ORDINANCE NO. 414 B (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 10.68 OF
TITLE 10 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO THE USE
OF SPRUCE AVENUE PARK SKATE FACILITY
33
F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public
hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to
receive public testimony.
CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 98-04 - RANCHO CUCAMONGA
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - A request to change the General
Plan Land Use Map from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units
per acre) and Civic/Community to Low-Medium Residential (4-8
dwelling units per acre) for 17 acres of land on the north side of
Base Line Road, approximately 1,300 feet east of the intersection
of Rochester Avenue - APN: 0227-091-18 through 21. Staff has
prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for
consideration.
RESOLUTION NO. 98-213
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT 98-04, A REQUEST TO CHANGE
THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM
MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING
UNITS PERACRE)AND CIVIC/COMMUNITY TO
LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING
UNITS PER ACRE), WITH A MASTER PLAN
REQUIREMENT, FOR 17 ACRES OF LAND,
LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BASE
LINE ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 1,300 FEET
EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF
ROCHESTER AVENUE, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 0227-
91-18 THROUGH 21
35
37
City Council Agenda
December 2, 1998
CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND
VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 98-03 - RANCHO
CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - A request to
change the Victoria Community Plan Land Use Map from Medium
Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and Community Facility
to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for 17
acres of land on the north side of Base Line Road, approximately
1,300 feet east of the intersection of Rochester Avenue - APN:
0227-091-18 through 21. Staff has prepared a Negative
Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration
ORDINANCE NO. 592 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA
COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 98-03, A
REQUEST TO CHANGE THE VICTORIA
COMMUNITY PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM
MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING
UNITS PER ACRE) AND COMMUNITY FACILITY
TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8
DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 17 ACRES
OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF
BASE LINE ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 1,300
FEET EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF
ROCHESTER AVENUE, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 0227-
091-18 THROUGH 21
35
40
CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 98-05 - CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA - A request to change the General Plan Land Use
Map from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to
Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for
approximately 6 acres of land on the north side of Base Line Road,
approximately 1,100 feet east of the intersection of Rochester
Avenue - APN: 0227-091-22 and 25. Staff has prepared a
Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration.
44
City Council Agenda
December 2, 1998
RESOLUTION NO. 98-214
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT 98-05, A REQUEST TO CHANGE
THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM
MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING
UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW-MEDIUM
RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER
ACRE), WITH A MASTER PLAN
REQUIREMENT, FOR SIX ACRES OF LAND,
LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BASE
LINE ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 1,100 FEET
EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF
ROCHESTER AVENUE, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORTTHEREOF-APN: 0227-
091-22 AND 25
CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND
VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 98-04 - CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to change the Victoria
Community Plan Land Use Map from Medium Residential (8-14
dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling
units per acre) for approximately 6 acres of land on the north side
of Base Line Road, approximately 1,100 feet east of the
intersection of Rochester Avenue and for 2 ½ acres of land
approximately 2,000 feet east of the intersection of Rochester
Avenue - APN: 0227-091-22, 25, and 43. Staff has prepared a
Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration.
ORDINANCE NO. 593 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA
COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 98-04, A
REQUEST TO CHANGE THE VICTORIA
COMMUNITY PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM
MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING
UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW-MEDIUM
RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER
ACRE) FOR 6 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON
THE NORTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD,
APPROXIMATELY 1,100 FEET EAST OF THE
INTERSECTION OF ROCHESTER AVENUE
AND FOR 2 ¼ ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON
THE NORTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD,
APPROXIMATELY 2,000 FEET EAST OF THE
INTERSECTION OF ROCHESTER AVENUE,
AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF - APN: 0227-091-22, 25, AND 43
47
44
49
City Council Agenda
December 2, 1998
G. PUBLIC HEARINGS
The following items have no legal publication or posting
requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public
testimony.
CONSIDERATION OF AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING
COMMISSION'S DECISION REGARDING THE LA FOURCADE
ARCH UNDER CUP 91-24 - MASl COMMERCE PARTNERS - A
request to appeal the Planning Commission's decision in denying
the change in location of placing the La Fourcade Arch on Building
5 - APN: 229-011-39.
53
H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
The following items do not legally require any public testimony,
although the Chair may open the meeting for public input.
No Items Submitted.
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
The following items have been requested by the City Council for
discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair
may open the meeting for public input.
SELECTION OF TWO COUNCIL MEMBERS TO SERVE ON THE
GENERAL PLAN REVISION TASK FORCE
CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FROM CITIZENS
COMMITTED TO CHILDREN TO SUPPORTA BOND MEASURE
FOR ALTA LOMA SCHOOL DISTRICT
RESOLUTION NO. 98-215
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, IN SUPPORT OF A GENERAL
OBLIGATION BOND FOR THE ALTA LOMA
SCHOOL DISTRICT
55
56
57
3. REPORT ON HISTORY OF CENTRAL PARK 58
City Council Agenda
December 2, 1998
J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to
discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this
meeting, only identified for the next meeting.
K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
This is the time and place for the general public to address the City
Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any
issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may
receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.
Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual.
L. ADJOURNMENT
MEETING TO ADJOURN TO EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS
PROPERTY NEGOTIATIONS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT ROCHESTER, BETWEEN
FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND ARROW ROUTE; JERRY FULWOOD,
DEPUTY CITY MANAGER, NEGOTIATING PARTY, REGARDING
TERMS OF PAYMENT.
I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my
designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda
was posted on November 25, 1998, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the
meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive.
October 21, 1998
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Re.qular Meetincl
A. CALL TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, October 21, 1998, in
the Council Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga,
California. The meeting was called to order at 7:20 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander.
Present were Councilmembers: Paul Biane, James Curatalo, Bob Dutton, Diane Williams, and Mayor
William J. Alexander.
Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City
Manager; Linda Daniels, RDA Director; Jan Reynolds, RDAAnalyst; Rick Gomez, Community Development
Director; Brad Buller, City Planner; Brent LeCount, Associate Planner; Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer;
Bob Zetterberg, Integrated Waste Coordinator; Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director; Tamara
Layne, Finance Officer; Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director; Dave Moore, Recreation
Superintendent; Paula Pachon, Management Analyst II; Diane O'Neal, Assistant to the City Manager; Chief
Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk.
B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
B1. Presentation of Certificates to Red Ribbon Button Design Winner and Honorable Mention
Recipients.
Paula Pachon, Management Analyst II, recognized David Quintenald as the winner of the design contest.
Francis Lee, Celese Shaw and Jessica Mock were also recognized for their efforts. Mayor Alexander also
presented a proclamation.
B2. Presentation of a Proclamation declaring October 23-31, 1998, as Red Ribbon Week in Rancho
Cucamonga.
Mayor Alexander presented a proclamation to Michelle Richardson.
Paula Pachon, Management Analyst II, added she has done a lot of work in conjunction with the Red Ribbon
Week program.
B3. Presentation of a Proclamation proclaiming October 24, 1998, as "Make a Difference Day," the week
of October 17 - 25, 1998, as "Second Chance Week," and November 15, 1998, as "America Recycles Day."
City Council Minutes
October 21, 1998
Page 2
Mayor Alexander read the proclamation and talked about the programs.
Sue Pitani presented the Council with a gift that was made with recycled products.
B4. Rod Hoops, Police Chief, introduced five new deputies for Rancho Cucamonga.
Bannes, Jean Molina, Tina Schafia, John Petovich and Matthew Yost.
They are: John
C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
C1.
John Lyons of Etiwanda stated he spoke at a previous meeting about Rex Gutierrez and how he
should pay restitution for what he has cost the City. He stated Mr. Gutierrez is under investigation
by the Department of Justice. He added he is circulating a petition to try to get the Council to force
Mr. Gutierrez to reimburse the City. He also commented on Mr. Gutierrez's campaign contributions.
He stated he did not feel Mr. Gutierrez was disclosing all information to the people of Rancho
Cucamonga. He stated he would be continuing his petition drive until January, 1999.
C2. Toni Rhodes inquired what special election was everyone talking about.
James Markman, City Attorney, stated it was the one held in June, 1998.
D. CONSENT CALENDAR
D 1. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 9/9/98, 9/30/98 and 10/7/98 and Payroll ending 9/17/98 for the
total amount of $2,566,605.33.
D2. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of September 30, 1998.
D3. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Off-Sale Beer and Wine for Rancho Cucamonga Drive-Thru
Dairy, Dasharath S. Patel & Gita Dasharathpatel, 8008 Archibald Avenue.
D4. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On-Sale Beer and Wine for Coco's, L&M Restaurants, Dean A.
Liuzzi, 12469 Foothill Blvd.
D5. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Off-Sale General for Lucky 573, Lucky Stores, Inc., northwest
corner Foothill Blvd. & Vineyard Avenue.
D6. Approval of a request to make a determination of Public Convenience or Necessity (PCN) 98-03 -
D ELRAHIM, for the issuance of an Alcohol Beverage Control License (Off-Sale General) for a service station
with convenience store, located at the southwest corner of Arrow Highway and Hermosa Avenue. APN 209-
04109, 22, 31 and related file: Conditional Use Permit 97-41.
City Council Minutes
October 21, 1998
Page 3
RESOLUTION NO. 98-188
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A DETERMINATION OF PUBLIC
CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY AND A REQUEST FOR THE ISSUANCE OF AN
ALCOHOL BEVERAGE LICENSE FOR A SERVICE STATION AND
CONVENIEN C E STORE LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORN ER OF ARROW
HIGHWAY AND HERMOSA AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF
D7. Approval of Easement Agreement for Reservation or Grant of Easement for Development Review
97-17, located at 6009 Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by Bruce and Mathilda McBride, Owners/Developers.
RESOLUTION NO. 98-189
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING EASEMENT AGREEMENT FOR
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 97-17
D8. Approval of the Environmental Initial Study Parts I and II for the proposed raised curb medians with
landscape from Vineyard Avenue to Haven Avenue along Foothill Blvd., including Deer Creek Channel
Bridge widening and issuance of a Categorical Exemption therefore.
RESOLUTION NO. 98-190
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL
STUDY PARTS I AND II AND ISSUANCE OF A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION
FOR THE PROPOSED RAISED CURB MEDIANS FROM VINEYARD AVENUE TO
HAVEN AVENUE ALONG FOOTHILL BLVD., INCLUDING DEER CREEK
CHANNEL BRIDGE WIDENING
D9. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and ordering the Annexation to
Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for C.U.P.
97-09, located at 8363 and 8333 Foothill Boulevard, submitted by Bear Gulch LLC.
RESOLUTION NO. 98-191
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENTAGREEMENTAND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR C.U.P. 97-09
RESOLUTION NO. 98-192
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN
TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR C.U.P. 97-09
City Council Minutes
October 21, 1998
Page 4
D10. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to
Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District 1 and 2 for Tract 15926,
located on the southwest corner of Hellman Avenue and Pepperidge Lane, submitted by Mr. Cecil Carney.
RESOLUTION NO. 98-193
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 15926,
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY
RESOLUTION NO. 98-194
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN
TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR TRACT MAP NO.
15926
D 11. Approval of Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement and Ordering the Annexation
to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 for DR 98-14,
located on the north side of La Senda Road, west of Sapphire Street, submitted by Michael David Cofield
and Patricia Lynne Cofield.
RESOLUTION NO. 98-195
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT
AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM MICHAEL DAVID COFIELD AND PATRICIA
LYNNE COFIELD AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN
THE SAME
RESOLUTION NO. 98-196
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN
TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 FOR DR 98-14
D12. Approval of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) (CO98-059) with Inland Valleys Resource
Center Court Referral Program to screen and monitor individuals performing court mandated community
service hours with the City.
D13. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13750, located at Wilson and Cherry
Avenues, submitted by First City/Hunter's Ridge Limited Partnership and Alper Development.
City Council Minutes
October 21, 1998
Page 5
RESOLUTION NO. 98-197
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13750
D14. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Parcel Map 13845, located on the southwest
corner of Rochester Avenue and Foothill Boulevard, submitted by Masi Commerce Center Partners.
RESOLUTION NO. 98-198
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13845
D 15. Approval to release the Faithful Performance Bond and accept a Maintenance Bond for on-site street
improvements for Tract 14534-2, located on the southeast corner of Victoria Park Lane and Rochester
Avenue.
MOTION: Moved by Curatalo, seconded by Biane to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports
contained in the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0.
No Items Submitted.
E. CONSENT ORDINANCES
F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
Fl. CONSIDERATION OF CODE AMENDMENTS REGARDING GRADING REVIEW AND TIME
EXTENSION
MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Biane to continue the item indefinitely, with it to be readvertised
due to an error in the information of the legal ad. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0.
No Items Submitted.
G. PUBLIC HEARINGS
City Council Minutes
October 21, 1998
Page 6
H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
H1. UPDATE AND DISCUSSION OF THEVIETNAM MEMORIAL MOVING WALL TO BE HELD AT THE
EPICENTER OCTOBER 24 - 29, 1998
Staff report by Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director.
Action: Report receive and filed.
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES UPDATE
A. PARKS & FACILITIES UPDATE
1. Lions West Community Center
2. Rancho Cucamonga Family Sports Center
3. Rancho Cucamonga Public Library
4. Stadium
5. Civic Center
6. Spruce Avenue Park Skate Facility
7. Victoria Groves
8. Coyote Canyon Park
9. Red Hill Park
10. Lions Park
11. Spruce Avenue Park
12. Etiwanda Creek Park
13. Central Park
14. All Park Facilities
15. Metrolink
COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE
1. Seniors
2. Teens
3. Youth Activities
4. Youth Sports
5. Rancho Cucamonga Family Sports Center
6. Adult Sports
7. Facilities
8. The Grapevine
9. Contract Classes
10. Community Wide Special Events
11. Proposed Boxing Program
12. Senior Transportation Program
13. Trips and Tours
14. Human Services
15. Park and Recreation Commission
16. Epicenter
Report received and filed.
City Council Minutes
October 21, 1998
Page 7
J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
No items were identified for the next meeting.
K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
No communications were made from the public.
L. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Dutton to adjourn to executive session to discuss Property
Negotiations per Government Code Section 54956.8 for property located at Rochester, between Foothill
Boulevard and Arrow Route; Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager, Negotiating Party, regarding Terms of
Payment. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 7:50 p.m. with no action taken in
executive session.
Respectfully submitted,
Debra J. Adams, CMC
City Clerk
Approved:
November 4, 1998
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Re.aular Meeting
A. CALL TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, November 4, 1998, in
the Council Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga,
California. The meeting was called to order at 7:04 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander.
Present were Councilmembers: Paul Biane, James Curatalo, Bob Dutton, Diane Williams, and Mayor
William J. Alexander.
Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City
Manager; Linda Daniels, RDA Director; Rick Gomez, Community Development Director; Dan Coleman,
Principal Planner; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer; Cindy Hackett, Associate
Engineer; Bob Zetterberg, Integrated Waste Coordinator; Bill Makshanoff, Building Official; Larry Temple,
Administrative Services Director; Ingrid Blair, GIS/Special Dist. Supervisor; Kevin McArdle, Community
Services Director; Dave Moore, Recreation Superintendent; Paula Pachon, Management Analyst II; Debbie
Clark, Library Director; Diane O'Neal, Assistant to the City Manager; Jenny Haruyama, Management Analyst
I, Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Captain Rodney Hoops, Rancho
Cucamonga Police Department; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk.
B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
B1. Presentation to the City of a $1,000 donation from Target Stores to the Rancho Cucamonga Police
Department.
Steve Fatuloff, National Investigator, presented Captain Rodney Hoops, Police Department, a check in the
amount of $1,000.00.
B2. Presentation of Stork Elementary's GATE Fall GIS City Government Project.
Principal Gayle Tangeman; William Mumbleau, Edison International; Jean Mumbleau, 5th Grade GATE
Coordinator, made their presentation of their plan to control traffic for the Christmas lights on Thoroughbred.
Some of the GATE students also made comments about the process they went through to come up with this
plan.
Mayor Alexander presented them with a proclamation.
City Council Minutes
November 4, 1998
Page 2
B3. Presentation to the City from American Public Works Association/Urban Regional Information
Systems Association (APWA/URISA) Most Original Award for GIS in Public Works, Project Showcase
October 15, 1998.
Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, and Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director, told about the award the City
had won. They thanked staff for their assistance.
B4. Jack Stutz, Leonard Robinson, and Steve LaManlra of Tamco received a proclamation from Mayor
Alexander for their safety program and accomplishments in this area.
C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
C1.
Malissa McKeith, 4993 Ginger Court, stated she has heard rumors that the City of Rancho
Cucamonga is negotiating with Lewis Homes on a land swap that would swap the Central Park
property and allow for the construction of homes on the park property in return for land that would
be located on Arrow. She asked if someone could confirm or dispel that rumor.
Mayor Alexander and the Council dispelled that rumor stating it is not true.
Malissa McKeith stated there is a photograph showing that the park property is excluded from the
parks district and that there are people that live across the street from the Central Park property and
pay fees into the district; however they have not had Central Park near them to enjoy for the last 15
years. She asked why the park is not part of the park district.
James Markman, City Attorney, stated the park district was structured for Red Hill and Heritage Parks and
was based on allocation of the use of those parks through certain areas of the City. He stated the park
district doesn't cover the whole City. He stated Cental Park was acquired through a series of dedications
from Lewis Homes over a 15-year period so that the acquisition costs were really a part of the dedication
from their planned development.
Malissa McKeith asked if Central Park could be included in the parks district and could that legally
be done.
James Markman, City Attorney, stated the City is exploring every mechanism for financing the development
and maintenance of Central park that is available under law. He felt anything that is done would probably
have to be done under an election because of Proposition 218. He stated staff is working with the public
to see what their priorities are for what goes in the park and also to ask what funding mechanism they would
like.
C2.
Linda Lapham, 6011 Cameo St., stated she also owns a sign business. She stated she has tried
to do business with the City to do regulatory and warning signs for over ten years, and has had no
luck. She understands there is a sign business within the City called Central City signs, which the
City does buy signs from. She added they have not had a valid business license since December,
1997. She asked she be considered to have her sign business looked at which is called "Vue-Way
Signs" as a possible supplier of signs to the City. She left her business card with the City Clerk.
City Council Minutes
November 4, 1998
Page 3
Mayor Alexander stated the City would looked into this.
C3.
Gary Kendrick congratulated Mayor Alexander, and Councilmembers Williams and Curatalo on their
recent election victory.
C4. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated he would like to request two executive sessions be added to the
agenda which would need a four-fifths vote to add them.
MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Williams to add the two executive session items. Motion carried
unanimously, 5-0. (See under adjournment for the two added items.)
D. CONSENT CALENDAR
D1.
Approval of Minutes:
September 2, 1998
September 16, 1998
October 7, 1998 (Biane absent)
October 15, 1998 (Special Meeting-
Curatalo/Dutton absent)
D2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 10/14/98 and 10/21/98 and Payroll ending 10/1/98, for the total
amount of $1,666,939.62.
D3. Approval to accept the assumption of Liability Rider, transferring liability for the Faithful Performance
Bond and Labor and Material Bond for Tract 12659-3, located at Etiwanda Avenue and Wilson Street, from
Fireman's Fund Insurance Company to Safeco Insurance Company of America, submitted by Centex
Homes.
D4. Approval of extension of Comcast Cable T.V. Franchise.
RESOLUTION NO. 91-012FF
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, EXTENDING COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
FRANCHISE LICENSE WITH COMCAST CABLE T.V. FOR 90 DAYS UPON
EXPIRATION OF CURRENT LICENSE WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA
D5. Approval to award a contract for the Rancho Cucamonga Public Library Expansion Project to
Schechtman Construction in the amount of $45,000 plus a 10% contingency) to be funded from Account No.
20-4532-9842 (Park Development Fund).
D6. Approval of Parcel Map No. 15209, located on the north side of Bell Court east of Red Oak Avenue,
submitted by Bell Court industrial.
City Council Minutes
November 4, 1998
Page 4
RESOLUTION NO. 98-200
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 15209
D7. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and ordering the Annexation to
Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for
Development Review 97-33, located at the southwest corner of Sixth Street and Rochester Avenue,
submitted by Dove Investments, Inc.
RESOLUTION NO. 98-201
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENTAGREEMENTAND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 97-33
RESOLUTION NO. 98-202
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN
TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DEVELOPMENT
REVIEW 97-33
D8. Approval to accept Improvement, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance
Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for DR 97-02, located on the northwest corner of
Sixth Street and Hyssop Drive.
Release: Faithful Performance Bond $68,300.00
No. 229701S
Accept: Maintenance Bond $ 6,830.00
No. 229701S
RESOLUTION NO. 98-203
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 97-02 AND AUTHORIZING
THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
MOTION: Moved by Dutton, seconded by Curatalo to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports
contained in the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0.
City Council Minutes
November 4, 1998
Page 5
No Items Submitted.
No Items Submitted.
No Items Submitted.
No Items Submitted.
No Items Submitted.
E. CONSENT ORDINANCES
F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
G. PUBLIC HEARINGS
H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
J1. Councilmember Dutton asked that a report come back regarding the policy for doing business with
the City because of comments made earlier in the meeting.
K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
K1. Mayor Alexander stated he would like to see everyone get their election signs down within 10 days.
K2. Councilmember Biane congratulated Mayor Alexander and Councilmembers Curatalo and Williams
on their election victories and stated he is looking forward to working with them in the future.
City Council Minutes
November 4, 1998
Page 6
L. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Biane to adjourn to executive session to discuss: A) Property
Negotiations per Government Code Section 54956.8 for property located at Eftwanda Creek Park; Jerry
Fulwood, Deputy City Manager, Negotiating Party; B) Property Negotiations per Government Code Section
54956.8 for property located at Rochester between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Route; Jerry Fulwood,
Deputy City Manager; Negotiating Party, regarding Terms of Payment; and C) Discussion of existing
litigation per Government Code Section 54956.9 with CURE. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. The meeting
adjourned at 7:41 p.m. No action was taken in executive session.
Respectfully submitted,
Debra J. Adams, CMC
City Clerk
Approved: **
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA
LIST OF WARRANTS
FOR PERIOD: 11-11-98 (98/99)
RUN DATE: 11/10/9S PAOE: I
VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMT.
3835
SIMPLER LIFE EMEROENCY PROVISIONB
ITO, LYNN
962
6011
43~1
1826
1430
5243
2437
t 135
4102
33
5670
41
1247
31~3
~43
85
1291
4826
6O
2110
105
4109
5744
3869
4524
2349
331~
5521
155
3~49&
3~497
5609
744
2834
1684
3~498
44&3
5244
36499
4S36
AT&T
ABC SCHOOL SUPPLY
ADV~M~ICED COPY SYSTEMS
AIRTOUCH CELLULAR
~dqERICAR BUSINESS FORM8
AMTECH LIQHTII~ SERVICES
ARLY SOUND
ABSOC IATED ENOINEERS
ASSOCIATED OROUP, THE
AUTO SPEC I~M. ISTS
B & K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE
BASELINE TRUE VALUE HARDWARE
BETTY JEAN'S PARTY PONIES
BISHOP COMPANY
BLAKE PAPER CO. , INC.
CALIFORNIA JOURNAL
CARDKEY SYSTEMS, INC
CENTRAL CITIES SION SERVICE
COMPUTERLAND
CUCAMONOA CO WATER DIST
DATAVAULT - ~.S. ~FE DEPOSIT CO.
DAWSON
DELTA DENTAL
DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES
DERBISH GUERRA & A~SOC.
DIRECT EDGE, INC.
DIRECT TV
DURO, KELLY
ELLISON EDUCATIONAL EQUIPMENT INC.
ESGIL CORP.
ESKENAZI, MOISES
EXPERIAN
FILARSKY & WATT
FLYNN, BARBARA
FOWLER CONSTRUCTION CO.
FRAWLEY, KEN
FUNDSELECT
OEIOER BROTHERS WEST
GENTRY BROS., INC.
OILKEY, KATHLEEN
GLOBAL EQUIPMENT COMPANY
ODDMOTHERS RESTORANTE & LOUNGE0 THE
OOLDEN WEST DISTRIBUTINO
OOMEZ, MARIA
GONZALEZ, MARVIN
GRAINGER, W.W
SUPPLIES
RECREATION
MONTHLY TELEPHONE BILLINGS
RECREATION REFUND
OFFICE E~UIPMENT
CELLULAR PHONE BILLINGS
OFFICE ~UPPLIE8
LIGHTING SUPPLIES
PROFESSION~ SERVICES
PROFESSIOI~ SERVICES
~T~Y ~INTE~E 8ERVICE
VEHICLE ~INTENANCE
MAINTE~E B~PLIE8
MAINTE~CE SUPPLIES
RECREATI~ ~ERVICE
MAINTEN~CE SUPPLIES
RECREATI~ SUPPLIES
8UBSCRIPTI~
PROFE88IO~ SERVICES
MAINTEN~E 8~PLIE8
C~PUTER MAINTENA~E/SUPPLIES
M~THLY ~TER BILLI~8
DATA 8T~AOE
LIBR~Y 8UB~RIPTI~
DENTAL INSTANCE
CLASS "A" LICENSE
CONTRACT SERVICE
MAINTE~E E~IPMENT
SUBSCRIPTI~
PROFESEION~ SERVICES
LIBRARY S~PLIEB
PROFE~SI~AL SERVICES
MILEAOE REIMBURSEMENT
PROFESSIONAL SERVICE8
MONTHLY SERVICES
RECREATION REFUND
DEPOSIT REFUND
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
DEFERRED COMP
OFFICE SUPPLIES
PROORESS PAYMENTS
PROFESSION~ SERVICES
OFFICE EQUIPMENT
PROFESSIONAL ~ERVICES
RECREATION SUPPLIES
RECREATI~ REFUND
PROFESSI~L ~ERVICE8
MAINTENANCE S~PLIES
** CHECK# OVERLAP
130026* 82. 14-
130027 - 132405 >:>~
132406# 52. 00-
132407- 133~01 >)>
133~02 O. 30
133~03 278.93
133504 36. 64
~ 133~0~ 1, ~44. ~8
133~06 323.81
1~7 3~. ~
e 133~8 1, 100. O0
13350~ ~1.25
133510 1 , ~3.04
e 133511 3, 276. 53
e 133512 2, 32~. 29
133~13 12.87
1335i4 400. O0
e 133515 404.8~
13351~ 4~. ~1
1~517 39. 95
~ 133518 487. 50
e 133519 9, 555. 99
13~5~0 775. 80
1335~1 - 133~1 ~
g 1~522 15, 070. 29
133523 275. 75
133~24 22. 80
13352~ 23, 280. 48
133526 7. O0
e 133927 20~ 246. O0
133~28 302. 50
133529 24. 9~
13~30 ~00. O0
133~31 3~9.94
13393~ 9,899. 96
133~33 18. 90
~ 133~34 100. O0
133~3~ 1, ~00. O0
133~36 ~0. O0
133537 1,000. O0
133538 ~50. O0
13~39 ~, 13~. O0
~ 133540 571. 70
133541 143, 110. 80
13354~ 75. O0
133543 91~. 65
133544 150. O0
13354~ 48. 5~
133~46 48. O0
133~47 ~00. O0
~ 133548 1,404. 61
,I
I
'1
.I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA
LIST OF WARRANTS
FOR PERIOD: 11-11-98 (98/99)
RUN DATE: 11/10/98 PAOE: 2
VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR, AMT.
OREENSTEEL, INC.
OROLIER PUBLISHINO COMPANY
137 OTE CALIFORNIA
31033 HAWTHORNE MACHINERY CO.
3520 HAYNES, FRANKLIN
4600 HAZPAK, INC.
2256 HI-LINE ELECTRIC COMPANY
437 HINDERLITER, de LLAMAS & ASSOCIATES
31038 HINES HORTICULTURE, INC.
4928 HOCKEY WEST
158 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO., INC.
31037 HOME TEAM SERVICES
3633 HOMELESS OUTREACH PRGMS & EDUCATION
1234 HOSEMAN
161 HOYT LUMBER CO., S.M.
103 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUST-457
5882 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 401
2733 ICMA Subscription Renewals
5804 INACOM COMMUNICATIONS
3736 INLAND EMPIRE SOCCER REFEREE ASSN.
908 INLAND MEDIATION BOARD
585~ INTERNATIONAL CALCULATOR
3989 INTOXIMETERs, INC.
30958 ITO, LYNN
&037 JOHNNY STARR & THE OALAXY
4431 JON'S FLAG SHOP
5790 KAMRANI, dOSEPH
4128 KELLY EQUIPMENT
2220 KELLY PAPER COMPANY
5894 KELLY, KRISTY
1218 KNOX
518 KUHN, MARY
4764 KULI IMAGE INC.
193 LAIRD CONSTRUCTION CO
321 LANDSCAPE WEST, INC.
849 LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC.
4993 LESLIE INC., dAY
5884 LILBURN CORPORATION
5479 LOMBARDI, OINNY
4189 LONO BEACH UNIFORM CO., INC.
3156 LU'S LIOHTHOUSE, INC.
3201 LUPE & dOHNNY'S BODY & PAINT SHOP
600 LYNCH, dANIE
549 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT. INC.
72 MARK CHRIS, INC.
4763 MARKS CABLEVISION
4727 MARSHALL PLUMBINO
31035 MAUl DONUTS II
5~83 MAYER, COBLE & PALMER
#* CHECK#
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES/SERVICES
LIBRARY SUPPLIES
<<< 133551 -
MONTHLY TELEPHONE BILLINOS #
BUSINESS LICENSE
PUPPET WORKSHOP
HAZ-MAT CLEAN-UP #
MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT
SALES TAX AUDIT SERVICES #
BUSINESS LICENSE
RECREATION #
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES #
BUSINESS LICENSE
MONTHLY SERVICES
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
133564 -
#
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
DEFERRED COMP
01 #
MEMBERSHIP DUES #
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
MEN'S SOCCER PROORAM #
LANDLORD/TENANT DISPUTE RESOL. #
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
RECREATION
RECREATION REFUND
RECREATION SUPPLIES
REIMBURSEMENT #
VEHICLE SUPPLIES #
PAPER SUPPLIES #
RECREATION
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES #
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
RECREATION SUPPLIES #
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE #
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES #
RECREATION EVENT
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES #
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
6 WHITE MONOOOSE BICYCLES
OIL ANALYSIS #
MAINTENANCE
RECREATION SUPPLIES
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE #
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
ADVERTISINO
REHAB. PROGRAM
BUSINESS LICENSE
PROFESSIONAL SERVICE
OVERLAP
133549 1,183.55
133550 285.79
133551
133552 3,093.53
133553 11.50
133554 300.00
133555 1,456.50
133556 404.91
133557 1,728.89
133558
13355~ 2,527.11
133561 73.80
1335&~ 10400.00
133563 ~7.84
133564
133565 510.19
133566 708.00
133567 60 944. 71
133568 1, 499. O0
133569 1,760. O0
133570 859.00
133571 1,813.64
133572 107.00
133573 76.98
133574 52.00
133575 500.00
133576 134.69
133577 173.99
133578 206.62
133579 48.27
133580 100.00
133581 438.76
133582 40.00
133583 6,217.71
133584 248.67
133~B5 190.59
133586 1,676,90
133587 200.00
133~88 ~,048.76
133589 400.00
133590 697.79
133591 551.96
133592 744.68
133593 33.71
133594 2,442.71
133595
133596 37.73
133597 561.88
133598 30.01
133599 1,250.00
,I
,I
'l
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'1
I
l
I
I
I
I
.I
I
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONgA
LIST OF WARRANTS
FOR PERIOD: 11-11-98
RUN DATE: 11/10/9B PAOE: 3
VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION HARR NO ~ARR. AMT.
5S56 MENDOZA, INC., E.A.
2t9S MICHAELS STORES INC. #3019
749 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY
5797 MMC, INC.
31034 MORAGA FAMILY DAYCARE
1020 MOUNTAIN VIEW QI_AS9 & MIRROR
2248 N~PA AUTO PARTS
3103~ NEWPORT MEAT CO., INC.
433 NIXON-EQLI EQUIPMENT
4327 OR~d~QE SPORTING GOODS
44~ PARK SPECIALITIES
5318 PARKER, SHANNON
757 PEP BOYS
3~3 PERFORMANCE AUTO BODY
31040 PIA BELLA, MARIA
6035 PIERCE, QREQORY
4554 PITASSI, PETER J.
5177 PORT BlIPPLY
6~3 POWERSTRIDE BATTERY CO., INC.
758 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION, INC.
3103& PRIORITY RESEARCH & RECOVERY SER.
583 PROTECTION SERVICE INDUSTRIES
65 PRUDENTI~N_ OVERALL 8UPPLY
4440 PUTI~N, BILC
5899 ~UALTIY ONE ENGRAVER8
11145 R N D WORKS
31113 R.C. PHOTOGRAPHY & ASSOCIATES
264 RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY
70 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER
11131 RIALTO, CITY OF
561S RICHARDS, WATSON, & GERSHON
7223 RICO, ERIC
11146 ROSS CONSTRUCTION
31S8 RUSSELL, NEAL
5967 SALITO, SHARON
581 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
5029 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FIRE DEPT,
13~ SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM CO, INC
5088 SANTA FE SPRINGS, CITY OF
1105 SEAL FURNITURE & SYSTEMS INC.
389& SENECHAL0 CAL
11148 SHANKS, LEIGH
1114~ SHOWTIME REMODELERS
2507 SIEBE ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS
351 SIGN SHOP, THE
5096 SLOUCH&FRIENDS, INC., THE
1327 SMART & FINAL
319 SO CALIF GAS CO.
~87 SOUTH COAST A 0 M D
PROGRESS ESTIMATE
RECREATION SUPPLIES
ALARM SERVICES
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
BUSINESS LICENSE
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
VEHICLE M~INTEN~NCE
BUSINESS LICENSE
VEHICLE M~INT~E
72 DOZEN 80F'FBALLS
MAINTENANGE ~ERV~CE & SUPPLIES
INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT
VEHICLE I~INTE!~E SUPPLIES
VEHICLE M~INTEN~NCE
RECREATION
RECREATION REFUND
~RCHITECT~L PROJECT
MAINTE~E 8~PLIE8
VEHICLE ~Z~E~E 8~PLIE8
MAINT/RECREATI~ 8~PLIES
BUSINESS LICE~E
PROTECTI~ SERVICES-LIONS CNTR
M~INTE~E ~PLIE8
W~ C~UTER SERVICE
OFFICE 8~PL[E8
BU8INE88 L~CE~E REFUNDS
PHOTO 8~PLIE8
RECREATI~ 8~PLIE8
MEMBER~IP MEETING
REQISTRATION
LEGAL SERVICE8
REFUND PER~ DE~CTION
BUSINS88 LICENSE REFUND
RECREATION ~UPPLIE~
RECREATION ~UPPLIE8
CAL-ID PRIAM
UNDERQRO~D TANKS
MAINT 8UPPLIE~
LITERACY PROGRAM
OFFICE SUPPLIES
INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT
RECREATION REFUND8
PERMIT DEPOSIT REFUND
SERVICE/S~PLIES
MAINT SUPPLIES
RECREATION, ENTERTAINMENT
DAY CAMP S~PLIE8
MONTHLY OA8 BILLS
STORAGE T~K
** CHECK# OVERL~
133b00 2,700.00
133601 62.90
133&02 3,755.52
133603 4,909.85
133&04 31. 50
13'3A05 31.71
133606 - 13~07
# 13360S 1~619.13
[33609 12.00
133A10 32. 56
133611 303. 53
133A12 2~o000.00
133613 168.00
133A14 18. 31
133615 1,670.04
# 133616 50.00
133617 400.00
133618 1o855.20
13~19 467.79
# 133A20 518.17
133621 31.67
133622 9.00
133623 2,593.22
133a~.4 27.25
13:~.5
133~26 60.34
1336~7
13~28 387.90
13~9 19. 34
~ 133630 800.00
133a31 20.00
~ 1~63~ 71.99
13~33 ~00.00
133a34 34.00
13363~ 12~.00
133636 60.00
133637 ~7,000.00
133638 311.42
133640 110,00
133641 192.50
133642 164.50
133643
133644 25000
133~45 15,721.00
133~46 7.54
133647 200.00
e 133~48 73.19
e 133~49 31~.11
1336~ 189~20
133651 - 133655
~]
,J
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
1
i
,]
I
I
I
!
VENDOR NAME
1432 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
3597 STATE OF CALIFORNIA
3597 STATE OF CALIFORNIA
3632 STEELWORKERS OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION
11150 STEINMETZ, MADONNA
5281 STERICYCLE, INC.
5079 SYNCHRONEX
3735 TANNER, O.C.
2344 TAROET
1262 TELEQUESTIONS
5980 TEN SPEED PRESS
394~ TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL P
2958 UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION
3437 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE
2682 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
4714 VPD
5800 WAKEHAM-BAKER, INC.
478 WARREN & CO , CARL
5176 WEST END KIDS CLUB OF THE YMCA
5811 WESTCOAST SAFETY SUPPLY
509 XEROX CORPORATION
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA
LIST OF WARRANTS
FOR PERIOD: 11-11-98 (98/99)
RUN DATE: 11/10/98 PAQE: 4
ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMT.
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
** CHECK# OVERLAP
MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLS # 133656
ANNUAL RENT-TRANSFER SITE 133657
ANNUAL RENT-TRANSFER SITE 133658
OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION 133&59
RECREATION REFUNDS # 133660
SHARPS PROORAM # 133661
VIDEO DETECTION SYSTEM 133662
EMPLOYEE SERVICE AWARDS # 133663
YOUTH PROQRAM & DAY CAMP SUPPL # 133664
EVALUATION TELECOMM EQUIPMENT # 133665
VARIOUS LIBRARY SUPPLIES 133666
MONTHLY PEST CONTROL SERVICE # 1336b7
UMP SERVICES # 133~8
UNIFORM SERVICES 133669
POSTAQE METER MONTHLY SERVICES 133670
LIBRARY SUPPLIES 133671
PROQRESS PAYMENT #2 133672
LIABILITY CLAIMS 133673
WEST END KIDS PROQRAM 133674
SAFETY SUPPLIES 133675
COPY MACHINE SUPPLIES/SERVICE # 133676
11,564.23
10.00
434.40
666,67
43. 50
232.29
9,121.04
8,416.30
71.12
1,750.00
40.10
4o121.75
395.45
4,500.00
124.36
&,560.10
~25.00
2,148.00
4,864.24
1,012.86
** TOTAL
511,078.50
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA
LIST OF WARRANTS
FOR PERIOD: 11-18-98
RUN DATE: 11/18/98
VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARP NO WARP, AMT.
CHECK# OVERLAP
31048 PEREZ, HEL~A RECREATION 130397- ~1.00-
<<< 1303~8 - 13~486 >>}
1107& SWAN, JUNE DEPOSIT PERMIT REFUND 13~487- ~50.
<~ 13~488 - 13~1~ >~>
30975 INLAND EMPIRE PURCHASIN~ ~ROUP MEETIN~ 13~13- 75.00-
00-
5857 MACKENZIE ELECTRIC 8,0~0.75
5903 SOLIS, EDWARD 3~0.00
31047 LANDIN~ BEN 4~0.00
20954 C P R S 30.00
6036 CARRIAOES BY MAROARET 500.00
20949 1ST STOP MARKET ~. 9~
I A A EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO.,INC. ~80.41
4373 A-CO SANITATION 131.68
20946 A. HARLEQUIN COSTUME 33.75
20959 AAA CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 3~.00
59~& ABBOT OFFICE SYSTEMS 3~4.~4
2732 ABC LOCKSMITHS 310.49
4347 ACCURATE SMOQ, AUTO, TRUCK & 249.95
3785 ACTION ART 58.35
14 ACTION TRAVEL A~ENCY ~10.00
~0957 ADVANCED PLANNIN~ INSURANCE 1~. O0
5231 AEF SYSTEMS CONSULTIN~ INC. 1~o 140.00
~0955 AHERN, SARAH ~0.00
4337 ALFAX WHOLESALE FURNITURE, INC, 1,~68.87
3448 ALL WE[~DIN~ 1, 185,00
17 ALTA FIRE EQUIPMENT CO. 1~.~7
1430 AMERICAN BUSINESS FORMS ~1~.53
~0950 AMERICAN DIE CASTINQ 58.88
409 AMERICAN EXPRESS ~3.05
20966 AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF CERTIFIED 40.00
37 AMERICAN SOCIETY OF PUBLIC ADMIN 1~0.00
37 AMERICAN SOCIEiY OF PUBLIC ADMIN. 80.00
2094B AMERICANWEST MESSA~INO/PA~INQ CORP. ~6.00
20964 ANDERSON~ DON J. ~o0~.00
20961 ANTONETTO~ dOAN 5~.00
5321 APOLLO WOOD RECOVERY, INC. 2~1. 55
5807 ARCHITERRA DESIQN QROUP ~,53~.~5
667 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 8~9. 12
3977 AUTODESK, INC. 1,~7~.84
4102 B & K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE ~,9~1.97
803 BALDY VIEW PUBLIC/PRIVATE COALITION 90.00
20965 BAMBER, JULIE 1D. 00
6153 BARCLAYS LAW PUBLISHERS 77.00
4475 BARNES & NOBLE 449.37
5121 DE VOO~HT, SCOTT d. , D70.00
5525 BOWERY, ROBERT ~40.00
~(( 13~614 - 133~58
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES # 13325~
~ 133~&0 - 133~7&
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES # 133~77-
REFUND-BUSINESS RELATED EXP. 133&78-
~4 133&79 - 133&79
CONTRACT SERVICE 133~80-
CONTRACT SERVICES # 133~81-
RECREATION 133~8~*
AWARD ENTRY FEE 133&83-
RECREATION REFUND 133~84-
((( 133&85 - 13368~
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 133~87
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES # 133688
E~UIPMENT RENTAL 133689
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 133~0
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 133&~1
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 133~9~
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 133~93
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES # 133~4
RECREATION SUPPLIES 133~5
AIRLINE TICKETS 133~
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 133&97
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES # 133~98
RECREATION REFUND 133699
OFFICE E~UIPMENT 133700
MAINTENANCE REPAIRS # 133701
SERVICE/SUPPLIES 13370~
OFFICE SUPPLIES # 133703
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 133704
AMERICAN EXPRESS BILLINGS 133705
MEMBERSHIP FEE 13370~
ANNUAL DUES 133707
ANNUAL DUES 133708
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 13370~
RELEASE OF CASH BOND 133710
RECREATION REFUND 133711
SUPPLIES & SERVICE # 13371~
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES # 133713
VISA MONTHLY BILLINGS # 133714
OFFICE SUPPLIE 133715
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 13371~
CLOUT MEETINQ # 133717
CLASS REFUND 133718
CCR TITLE 1~ COMPLETE AMENDS 133719
LIBRARY SUPPLIES # 133720
1 A A EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO,INC. ~3.41-
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA
LIST OF WARRANTS
FOR PERIOD: 11-18-98
RUN DATE: 11/18/98 PAGE: 2
VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMT.
~* CHECK# OVERLAP
33 BASELINE TRUE VALUE HARDWARE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 133721 25. 13
4441 BEST BUY CO., INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES # 133722 355.37
20947 BIRCHWOOD MARKETING GRAPHICS BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 133723 32.28
41 BISHOP COMPANY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 133724 965.51
1247 BLAKE PAPER CO., INC. RECREATION SUPPLIES # 133725 47. 15
209&0 BONTEMPO, COLLETTE RECREATION REFUND 13372& 28.75
5145 BOSE, RATHINDRA CASH ADVANCE 133727 267.21
5525 BOWERY, ROBERT REFUND-BUSINESS RELATED EXP. 133728 33.07
20952 BRINDLEY INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 133729 20.00
4369 BRODART BOOKS LIBRARY SUPPLIES # 133730 5,283.04
20962 BROWN, WILLIAM R. DEPOSIT REFUND 133731 500.00
5341 BUCKNAM & ASSOCIATES CONSULTANT SERVICES 133732
20953 BURNHAM SERVICE COMPANY, INC. BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 133733 61.65
5959 BUSINESS WEEK SUBSCRIPTION 133734 37.95
1648 C A P C A MEMBERSHIP DUES 133735 75.00
1851 CAL WESTERN PAIN]' MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 133736
97 CALIF. PARK ~ RECREATION SOCIETY, INC REGISTRATION 133737
4412 CALIFORNIA ELECYRONIC ENTRY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES/SERVICE # 133738 822.04
l~ll CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL STATISTICS INC DEBT STATEMENT CITY OF R.C. 133739 375.00
4735 CALOLYMPIC SAFETY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 133740 245.50
68 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SERVICE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 133741 335.94
5845 CERAMICS & CRAFIS CERAMIC EQUIPMENT & SUPPLIES 133742 1,047. 50
69 CHAFFEY JOINT UNION H S DISTRICT RENTAL. - AUDITORIUM R.C.H.S. 133743 3~ 175.70
488 CHEVRON U S A, INC GASOLINE CHARGES 133744 65.~0
713 CHICK'S SPORTINQ GOODS INC RECREATION SUPPLIES # 133745 468.04
20951 CITY CONCRETE PRODUCTS, INC. BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 13374& 40.80
74 CITY RENTALS EGUIPMENT RENTAL/SUPPLIES 133747 49.78
20956 CLEVELAND, RANDALL RECREATION REFUND 133748 10.50
4211 COAST RECREATION, INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 133749 3o010. 15
23~2 COM SER COMPANY, INC. SERVICE/REPAIRS 133750 517.09
643 COMPUTERLAND COMPUTER MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES # 133751 372.82
4907 CONTRACTORS EQUIPMENT CO. EQUIPMENT # 133752
20963 COOGAN, dACA CYBERSPACE CLASS REFUND 133753 15.00
~0958 CORPORATE IMAGE BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 133754 58.81
~4 133757
MONTHLY WATER BILLINGS 133758
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 133759
OFFICE SUPPLIES 133760
CONTRACT SERVICE # 133761
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 133762
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 133763
RECREATION REFUND 133764
EMPLOYEE OF THE MONTH # 133765
REGISTRATION FEES 133766
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE # 133767
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 133768
PERSONNEL SERVICES # 133769
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES # 133770
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 133771
RECREATION SUPPLIES 133772
SUPPLIES 133773
133755 -
85 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST # 22,064.46
36500 DAVEY ROOFINg, INC. 39.60
347 DAY-TIMERS, INC. 22.74
105 DERBISH GUERRA & ASSOC. 11,924.00
4553 DESIGN WEST 21.53
5534 DIAL COMMUNICATIONS 60.00
36501 DIAZ, ALMA 80.00
4544 DICK, ERIC 75.00
3650~ DIEHL, EVANS & COMPANY, LLP 3~0.00
839 DIETERICH INTERNATIONAL TRUCK
3779 DORNING, GLENN B. 33.13
5767 ELITE PERSONNEL SERVICES~ INC. 589.41
5137 EMPIRE MOBILE HOME SERVICE 1~ 111. 50
3~410 EGUILON ENTERPRISES 22.00
5262 EVANS SPORTING GOODS 3o050.00
6030 EVI-PAQ 57.36
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA
LIST OF WARRANTS
FOR PERIOD: 11-18-98
RUN DATE: 11/18/98 PAQE: 3
VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMT.
** CHECk# OVERLAP
229 EWINQ IRRIQATION PRODUCTS IRRIQATION SUPPLIES # 133774 315.49
5~i7 FASTENAL COMPANY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 133775 255.00
i23 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP DELIVERY SERVICE 13377~ 15.50
2~0~ FILTER RECYCLIN~ SERVICE, INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 133777
36503 FLAIR COMPANY BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 133778
476~ FOOTHILL FAMILY SHELTER FAMILY SHELTER 133779 242.50
36504 FRANCISCO, WENDY REIMBURSEMENT 133780 75.00
5833 FRITTS FORD EOUIPMENT 133781
36505 ~-TECH COMMUNICATIONS BUSINESS LIC£NBE REFUND 133782 20.00
3356 ~ARCIA, VIVIAN MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 133783 ~1.42
3~ ~IBBY'S FENCIN~ MATERIALS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 133784 2~041.85
3388 OOLDEN BEAR ARBORISTS, INC. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 133785 4,300.00
38~7 ~REEN ROCK POWER EOUIPMENT MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 13378~ 200.31
444 133787 - 133788
137 ~TE CALIFORNIA MONTHLY TELEPHONE BILLINQS # 133789 8,5~6.70
2855 HAVEN WINE & LIQUOR CO SUB-COMMITTEE MEETINQS # 133790 344.54
46~ HCS-CUTLER STEEL CO. E~UIPMENT MAINTENANCE # 133791 12&.71
4845 HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH MONTHLY RENT 13379~ 10000.00
4~8 HOCKEY WEST RECREATION 133793 115.&7
158 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO., INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 133794
2255 HOLT'S AUTO ELECTRIC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 133795
3634 HOUSE OF RUTH 93/94 CDB~ CONTRACT 13379b ~13.00
167 I C B 0 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 133797 105.00
~188 I.D. BURR MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 1337~8 ~1.44
~733 ICMA Subscription Renemals MEMBERSHIP DUES 133799 1,184.00
2733 ICMA Subscription Renemals MEMBERSHIP DUES 133800 75.00
3736 INLAND EMPIRE SOCCER REFEREE ASSN. MEN'S SOCCER PRO~RAM 133801 453.00
~2 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN SUBSCRIPTIONS # 13380~ ~3.84
1~2 INLAND VALLEY DA~LY BULLETIN ADVERTISING 133803
1471 IRON A~E CORPORATION SAFETY SHOES # 133804 133.83
133805 - 133805
612 JAESCH½E INC., C.R. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE # 13380~
31043 JOHNSON, TIMOTHY REFUND OF DEPOSIT 133807 500.00
31044 KEDNEY, dUDY RECREATION 133808 48.00
14~ ~IN~, L.D. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES # 133809 10,290.00
1218 KNOX MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 133810 40.78
4~82 KORANDA CONSTRUCTION C.D.B.9. # 133811 520.00
424~ LAIDLAW TRANSIT, INC. TRANSPORTATION SERVICES 133812 797.97
1~7 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES ANNUAL DUES 133813 100.00
2358 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES MEETIN~ REGISTRATION 133814 200.00
5818 LECTORUM PUBLICATIONS, INC. LIBRARY SUPPLIES 133815 l&. D4
5380 LIFE ASSIST MEDICAL SUPPLIES 133816 81.76
1455 LONQ'S DRUQS FILM PROCESSINQ 133817
5~6~ LOS ANGELES COCA COLA BTL. CO. RECREATION SUPPLIES 133818
200 LOS ANQELES TIMES SUBSCRIPTION 133819 33.12
31041 M.½.P CONSTRUCTION RELEASE OF DEPOSIT 133820 1,000.00
10~5 MC MASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 133821 14.~0
603~ MCQRUFF SAFE KiDS RECREATION REFUND 133822
60~ MEYER~ PAT REIMBURSEMENT FOR SUPPLIES 133823 30.00
21~8 MICHAELS STORES INC. #301~ RECREATION SUPPLIES 133824 21.51
5852 MIDWEST TAPE LIBRARY SUPPLIES 133825 29 90
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
LIST OF WARRANTS
FOR PERIOD: 11-18-98 (98/99)
RUN DATE: 11/18/98 PAGE:
VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMT.
CHECK# OVERLAP
31046 MINOLTA BUSINESS SYSTEMS, INC. BUSINESS LICENSE
3860 MOBILE MINI, INC. STORAGE SUPPLIES #
3316 MR. T'S 24-HR. TOWING TOWING #
4853 OCLC, INC. CORE SERVICES CHARGES
5~3 OFFICE DEPOT
5393 OMLOR, AMY
232 OMNITRANS
3429 ON CALL COMPUTER SUPPLY
4904 OTT, LAURA
338 PACIFIC EGUIPT & IRRI~ATION, INC~
1823 PAGENET
31048 PEREZ, HELQA
31042 PERSHINg, RUSS CONSTRUCTION
31045 PIERCE, JUNE
272 PITNEY BOWES
255 POMA DISTRIBUTIN~ CO
3952 POMONA INL VALLEY CNCL OF CHURCHES
2~61 PORCU, DANIEL
30936 POTTER, MELISSA
758 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION~ INC
65 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY
3663 R & T SPECIALTY, INC.
418 R M A GROUP
~64 RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY
70 RANCHO CUCAMONgA CHAMBER
2496 RANCHO GRANDE KIWANIS
207 RANCHO MINI STORAGE
6003 RANCHO PARTY RENTALS
5914 REXEL CALCON ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
~76 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT
6~6 ROBLES, RAUL P~ , SR.
1492 SAN BERN CO FLOOD CONTROL DEPT
303 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
5338 SAN BERNARDINO, CITY OF
11151 SCHILLIN~ LAURA A
5752 SCHWAAB, INC.
6033 SCRIPPS CENTER FOR EXECUTIVE HEALTH
11134 SCTC INSTITUTE
18~9 SHARED TECH FAIRCHILD TELECOM, INC
5274 SHAROU, DIANA
351 SIGN SHOP, THE
4513 SIMON & SCHUSTER
692 SIR SPEEDY
1327 SMART & FINAL
31~ SO CALIF OAS
135 SO CALIF MUNICIPAL ATHLETIC FED, INC
5~03 SOLIS, EDWARD
1432 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1115~ SOZO~OWSKI, dON
4568 SPECIALTY CLEANIN~ SYSTEMS
OFFICE SUPPLIES
COMMUNITY SERVICES ENTERTAINMT
BUS PASSES
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
INSTRUCTOR SNR. EXERCISE CLASS
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
PAGING SERVICE
RECREATION
RELEASE OF DEPOSIT
RECREATION
POSTAGE METER RENTAL
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE & SUPPLIES
WEST END HUNGER PROGRAM
RECREATION, ENTERTAINMENT
RECREATION
MAINT/RECREATION SUPPLIES
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
D A R E SUPPLIES
SOIL TESTING SERVICES
RECREATION SUPPLIES
MEMBERSHIP MEETING
MEMBERSHIP DUES
MINI STORAGE
RECREATION REFUND
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
PRINTS
TIRE REPAIR
INSPECTION FEE
ENGINEERING OFFICE SUPPLIES
TELETHON SUPPORT
RECREATION REFUNDS
SUPPLIES
RECREATION REFUND
SEMINAR REGISTRATION
TELEPHONE SERVICES
~RAPHIC DESIGNER
MAINT SUPPLIES
LIBRARY SUPPLIES
FAXES
DAY CAMP SUPPLIES
MONTHLY ~AS BILLS
REGISTRATION
CONTRACT SERVICES
MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLS
REFUND TUP CASH DEPOSIT
MAINTENANCE
133830 -
#
133826 7.54
133827 261.84
133828 28D. 00
133829 72.34
133832
133833 3,344.04
133834 50. GO
133835 381.00
13383~
133837 ~21.00
133838 22~.7~
133839 788.36
133840 21.00
133841 500.00
133842 24.00
133843 352.35
133844 10,733.78
133845 1,026.00
13384~ 200.00
133847 150.00
133848 99.41
133849 54.50
133850 753.00
133851 330.00
133852 1~.~1
133853 30.00
133854 100.00
133855 750.00
133856 70.0O
133857 3~.49
133858 3.50
133859 118.50
133860 11~0~5.00
133861 200.00
133862 1~33~.00
1338~3 ~0.00
1338~4 32.83
133865 1,&14.90
1338&& 7&O. 00
133867 7~4.98
133868 525.00
133869 75.43
133870 171.3~
133871
133872 1,381. 1~
133873
133874 13~.00
133875 190.00
133876 4,700.51
133877 500.00
133878 4, 150.00
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
LIST OF WARRANTS
FOR PERIOD: 11-18-98 (98199)
RUN DATE: 11/18/98 PAGE: 5
VENDOR NAME ' ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMT.
CHECK# OVERLAP
3017 STATE OF CALIFORNIA UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 133879 1,9&0.00
30i7 STATE OF CALIFORNIA UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 133880 30.00
3632 STEELWOR½ERS OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION 133881 912.74
11153 SUN RAMS PRODUCTS, INC. BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS 133882 34.80
11076 SWAN, dUNE DEPOSIT PERMIT REFUND 133883 250.00
2344 TARGET YOUTH PROGRAM & DAY CAMP SUPPL # 133884 68.47
836 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS MAINT SUPPLIES # 133885 107.3~
11154 TORO COMPANY SEMINAR 133886 280.00
5455 TYPECARE TYPEWRITER REPAIRS # 133887 111.33
2737 U.C. REGENTS POCKET GUIDE 133888 432.00
5155 U.S. BANK TRUST LEASE PAYMENT 133889 104,517.00
5155 U.S. BANK TRUST LEASE PAYMENT 133890 2,620.35
350 U.S. POSTMASTER POSTAGE LANDSCAPE NEWSLETTER 133891 6°500.00
343'7 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFORM SERVICES 133892 468.45
5601 UNIQUE MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. MANAGEMENT SERVICES 133893 639. 5&
5520 UNIQUE PAVING MATERIALS OF CA,INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 133894 460.31
6027 UNISYS CORPORATION BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 133895 4~5.00
6004 UNITEK RECREATION REFUND 133896 ~,517.04
5307 VALLEN SAFETY SERVICE & SUPPLIES # 133897 6,016.85
10662 VENTURE PUBLISHING, INC SUBSCRIPTION 133898 4.50
11160 VERANDA COMMUNICATIONS, INC AUDIO TAPES 133899 23. O0
11160 VERANDA COMMUNICATIONS, INC AUDIO TAPES 133900 80.00
474 VERMEER-CALIFORNIA MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 133901 248.72
11155 VINEYARD CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP RECREATION REFUNDS 133~02 190.00
4'714 VPD LIBRARY SUPPLIES 133903 64.38
11156 WAGNER STEEL, INC. BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 133904 6.0~
11157 WATER OF LIFE CHURCH RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND # 133905 400.00
213 WAXIE, KL. EEN-LINE CORP MAINT SUPPLIES # 133906 1,318.81
4577 WELLS FARGO GUARD SERVICES SECURITY GUARD SERVICES 133907 1,033.85
5526 WEST GROUP PUBLISHING # 133908 174.55
5838 WIRE CRAFTERS SUPPLIES 133909 543.00
509 XEROX CORPORATION COPY MACHINE SUPPLIES/SERVICE # 133910 645.89
11158 YAP, ALICE RECREATION REFUNDS 133911 17.00
1~15~ YEE INVESTMENTS, TONE BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS # 133~12 1,909.80
371 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE RECREATION SUPPLIES 133913 16.97
TOTAL 359, 1~8.49
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
December 2, 1998
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, City Manager
Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director
Approval to Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City
of Rancho Cucamon~,a, California, Adoprint, New Trust Requirements
Under the Small Business Job Protection Act
Recommendation
It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached resolution adopting new trust
requirements as required by law for the City's deferred compensation plan.
Backt, round
In 1996, congress passed the Small Business Job Protection Act that requires state and local
government deferred compensation plans (Section 457 Plans) to hold all assets and income in a trust
for the exclusive benefit of employees. Congress established the new trust requirement in order to
protect the assets from creditors in the event that the state or local government becomes insolvent.
The Act also requires that the trust be established by January 1, 1999. The attached "Deferred
Compensation Plan Amended and Restated Plan and Trust/Custodial Document" complies with the
requirements of the Act.
Respecttully submitted,
Lawrence I. Temple
Administrative Services Director
Attachment
RESOLUTION NO. ~-" o~//
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA ADOPTING NEW TRUST
REQUIREMENTS UNDER THE SMALL BUSINESS JOB
PROTECTION ACT FOR THE CITY'S DEFERRED
COMPENSATION PLAN
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter "City") has employees
currently participating in a 457 deferred compensation retirement savings plan administered by
Great Western Bank; and
WHEREAS, the City wishes to adopt the Fund Select Specimen Plan and Trust
Document which includes those statutory revisions made to Internal Revenue Code Section 457
by the Small Business Job Protection Act of 1996; and
WHEREAS, Great Western Bank/Fund Select Advisers are able to administer the
deferred compensation plan for the City in accordance with the terms of their respective
agreements.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, California as follows:
1. The City hereby establishes the deferred compensation plan and adopts the 457
Plan and Trust Document.
2. A trust is hereby created to hold all the assets of the plan for the exclusive benefit
of participants and beneficiaries except that expenses and taxes may be paid from the
trust, as provided in the plan document. The trustee shall be the City, or its
designated officer or such other person or entity as may agree to act in that capacity.
3. The City or its designated officer is hereby authorized to execute all necessary
agreements with Fund Select Advisers, Inc. and Great Western Bank incidental to the
administration of the Plan, and shall do all things necessary and proper to implement
this Resolution.
4. This Amended and Restated Plan and Trust Document supersedes and replaces
any prior plan adopted by the City.
//
Resolution No.
Page 2
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAINED:
day of__
,1998.
William J. Alexander, Mayor
ATTEST:
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk
I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California
do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the
City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City
Council held on the day of__., 1998 in Rancho Cucamonga, California
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk
DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
AMENDED AND RESTATED PLAN AND TRUST DOCUMENT
Section 1.
Section 2.
Section 3.
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
Name: The name of this Plan and Trust Document is the Rancho Cucamonga
Deferred Compensation Plan, hereinafter referred to as the "Plan." This Plan is the
continuation in restated form of the Rancho Cucamonga Deferred Compensation Plan
previously established by the City Council.
Purpose: The primary purpose of the Plan is to attract and retain personnel by
permitting them to enter into agreements with the Employer that will provide for
deferral of payment of a portion of their current Compensation until death, disability,
retirement, termination of employment, or other events as provided herein, in
accordance with applicable provisions of State law, and Section 457 and other
applicable Sections of the Internal Revenue Code. Except as otherwise stated herein,
this amended and restated Plan shall become effective January 1, 1999..
Definitions: For the purposes of this Plan when used and capitalized herein the
following words and phrases shall have the meanings set forth below.
"Account" means the book account maintained in accordance with Subsection 6.4 for
the purpose of recording Deferred Compensation and investment gains or losses
allocated thereto.
"Administrator" means the service provider or providers with whom the Employer
contracts either investment, record-keeping or other management services for the
Plan.
"Beneficiary" means the person or persons a Participant designates to receive his
interest under the Plan after the Participant's death, [provided that a married
Participant may designate someone other than his spouse as his Beneficiary only with
his spouse's consent.] The designation may be made, and may be revoked and
changed, only by a written instrument (in form acceptable to the Employer) signed
by the Participant, consented to by the Participant's spouse if necessary, and filed
with the Employer prior to the Participant's death, or if no designated Beneficiary
survives the Participant, his Beneficiary shall be his spouse if he is married, or, if not,
his estate.
"Code" means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
3.5
"Compensation" means the total of all amounts of salary or wages which would be
paid by the Employer to or for the benefit of an Employee (if he were not a
Participant in the Plan) for services performed during the period that the Employee
is a Participant, including any amounts of Deferred Compensation that may be
credited to the Participant's Account. Compensation shall be taken into account at
its present value and its amount shall be determined without regard to any
community property laws.
3.6
"Trustee/Custodian" means a bank, trust company, financial institution, or other
legally authorized entity appointed by the Employer to have custody of assets in the
Investment and Trust/Custodial Fund.
3.7
"Deferred Compensation" means the amount of Compensation which the Participant
defers pursuant to his Participation Agreement in accordance with the provisions of
this Plan.
3.8
"Disability" means the inability of a Participant to engage in his usual occupation by
mason of a medically determinable physical or mental impairment as determined by
the Employer on the basis of advice from a physician or physicians.
3.9
"Election Period" means the 59-day period after separation from service with the
Employer during which a Participant may elect to defer commencement of benefit
payments under the Plan.
3.10
"Employee" means any individual who provides services for the Employer, whether
as an employee of the Employer or as an independent contractor, and who has been
designated by the Employer as eligible to participate in the plan.
3. l 1 "Employer" means the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
3.12
"Employer Contribution" means the contribution made by the Employer pursuant to
Subsection 5.2 of the Plan.
3.13
"Employment Period" means a period from January 1 through December 31 of the
same year, except that the first Employment Period of an Employee hired on any date
other than January 1 shall be the period beginning with the date of employment and
ending on December 31 of the same year.
3.14
"Includible Compensation" means Compensation which (taking into account the
provisions of the Code, including Section 403(b) and Section 457) is currently
includible in gross income for federal income tax purposes.
3.15
"Investment and Trust Fund" means a fund established by the Employer as a
convenient method of setting aside a portion of its assets to meet its obligations under
the Plan, as provided in Subsection 6.1. The fund may be in any form permitted
under Section 457 (g).
3.16
"Normal Retirement Age" means the date a Participant attains age 70 ½ or, at the
election of the Participant, any earlier date that is no earlier than the earliest age at
which the Participant has the right to retire under the California Public Employees
Retirement System and to receive immediate retirement benefits calculated without
actuarial reduction, but in any event not later than the date or age at which the
participant separates from service with the Employer. If a Participant is employed
by the Employer beyond age 70 ½, his Normal Retirement Age may be the age at
which he separates from service with the Employer, provided that the distribution
requirements of Subsection 7.5 are still satisfied with respect to the Participant, and
provided further that a Participant who has utilized the catch-up deferral provisions
of Subsection 5.3(b) may not thereafter change his Normal Retirement Age.
3.17 "Participant" means any Employee who fulfills the participation requirements under
Section 4.
3.18
"Participation Agreement" means the agreement executed and filed by an Employee
with the Employer pursuant to Section 4, under which the Employee elects to
become a Participant in the Plan and to defer Compensation thereunder.
Section 4. Participation in the Plan:
4.1
Participation. Each Employee may elect to become a Participant in the Plan and
defer payment of compensation not yet earned by executing a written Participation
Agreement and filing it with the Employer at any time during active employment
with the Employer. Compensation shall be deferred for any calendar month only if
a Participation Agreement providing for such deferral has been entered into and is
effective before the beginning of such month.
4.2
Modification of Deferral. A Participation Agreement shall remain in effect until it
is terminated or modified. A Participant may modify an existing Participation
Agreement to effect subsequent deferrals in accordance with rules established by the
Employer. Such modification must be filed by the Participant with the Employer
prior to the beginning of the month for which the modification is to be effective.
4.3
Termination of Deferral. A Participant may terminate further deferral of
Compensation under the Plan effective at the beginning of any month by filing with
the Employer an executed notice of termination of his Participation Agreement prior
to the effective date of termination. Once further deferral of Compensation is
terminated, a Participant may rejoin the Plan in accordance with rules established by
the Employer. No previously deferred amounts shall be payable to an Employee
upon terminating further deferral of Compensation under the Plan unless otherwise
due pursuant to Section 7 hereof.
4.4
Selection of Investment Options. The Participation Agreement shall also provide for
the selection, pursuant to Subsection 6.3, of one or more investment options in the
Investment and Trust Fund to which the Participant's Deferred Compensation shall
be allocated; provided that any amounts so allocated equal or exceed a minimum of
$10.00 per pay period. The employer shall invest the Participant's deferrals in
accordance with such selection.
Section 5. Amount of Deferrals: Deferral of Compensation:
5.1
Deferral of Compensation. During each Employment Period in which an Employee
is a Participant in the Plan, the Employer shall defer payment of such part of the
Participant's Compensation as is specified by the Participant in the Participation
Agreement which the Participant has executed and filed with the Employer.
5.2
Employer Contribution. During each Employment Period in which an Employee is
a participant in the Plan, the Employer may make an Employer Contribution to the
Participant's Account at an amount or percentage specified by resolution or labor
contract approved by the Employer.
5.3
Limitation. The amount of Compensation which may be deferred by a Participant
and the amount of Employer Contributions, if any, made to a participant's Account
are subject to the following limitations:
(a)
Annual Limitation. Except as provided in Paragraph (b) below, the maximum
amount that a Participant may defer during an Employment Period when added to the
amount of any Employer Contribution for such Participant during the Employment
Period, shall not exceed the lesser of $8,000 (or as may be adjusted for cost-of-living
by the Secretary of the Treasury) or 33 1/3% of the Participant's Includible
Compensation. The minimum amount that a Participant may defer is $10.00 per pay
period.
(b)
Catch-Up Deferrals. For one or more of a participant's last three Employment
Periods ending before the Participant attains Normal Retirement Age, the maximum
amount a Participant may defer during the Employment Period, when added to the
amount of any Employer Contribution for such Participant during the Employment
Period established in Paragraph (a) above, plus so much of such maximum amounts
determined under such Paragraph (a) for Employment Periods beginning after
December 31, 1978 but before the current Employment Period in which the
Participant was eligible to participate in the Plan (or in another eligible deferred
compensation plan under Section 457(b) of the Code) less the amount of
compensation actually deferred under such paragraph (a) for such prior Employment
Periods shall not exceed $15,000 per each of such three Employment Periods. The
provisions of this Paragraph (b) shall not apply more than once to each Participant.
(c)
Aggregation of Plans. In applying Paragraphs (a) and (b) above, the amount that may
be deferred by a Participant under the Plan for any Employment Period shall be
reduced by (i) the amount deferred by the Participant for such Employment Period
under any other eligible deferred compensation plan under Section 457(b) of the
Code, (ii) any Employment Period under Section 403(b) of the Code, (iii) any
amount excluded from the Participant's gross income for such Employment Period
under Section 402(a)(8) or Section 402(h)(B) of the Code, and (iv) any amount with
respect to which a deduction is allowable for such Employment Period by mason of
a contribution on behalf of the Participant to an organization described in Section
501(c)(18) of the Code. The Participant shall inform the Employer of his
participation in any of the above-listed plans and is solely responsible for any
violation of this Paragraph (c).
Section 6. Investment and Trust Fund Provisions:
6.1
Investment and Trust Fund. The Employer shall establish an Investment and Trust
Fund for the purpose of investing amounts of Deferred Compensation and Employer
Contributions, if any, credited to Participant Accounts. Such Participants Accounts
shall at all times be held by the Trustee for the exclusive benefit of the Participant or
Beneficiary.
6.2 Trust/Custodial Provisions:
(a)
Trustee. The Trustee shall be, at any time the duly appointed and authorized
Administrative Services Director. Resignation, removal and appointment of such
Trustee, as well as compensation and expense reimbursement of the Trustee, if any
shall also be in accordance with appropriate legal guidelines for resignation, removal,
appointment, compensation and expense reimbursement of the City of Rancho
/7
Cucamonga. In the event the position of Administrative Services Director is vacant,
the City Manager or City Council, may appoint another person or entity to serve as
Trustee until the position is filled. In the event the position of Administrative
Services Director is abolished, the incumbent declines appointment or the incumbent
is otherwise unwilling or unable to serve as Trustee, the City Manager or City
Council may appoint another person or entity as Trustee.
(b)
The Trustee or the Employer shall adopt various investment options for the
investment of deferred amounts by Participants or their Beneficiaries, and shall
monitor and evaluate the appropriateness of continued offering by the Plan. The
Trustees or the Employer may de-select options that are determined to be no longer
appropriate for offering. In adopting or de-selecting such options, the Trustees or
Employer, the Participants or their Beneficiaries shall be entitled to select from
among the available options for investment of their deferred amounts. In the event
options are de-selected, the Trustee or Employer may require Participants to move
balances to an alternative option offered by the Plan. If any Participants fail to act
in response to the written notice, the Trustees or employer shall transfer monies out
of the de-selected option to an alternative option chosen by the Trustee or Employer.
By exercising such right to select investment options or by failing to respond to
notice to transfer from a de-selected option where the Trustees or Employer move the
monies on behalf of such Participants, the Participants, and their Beneficiaries agree
that none of the Plan fiduciaries will be liable for any investment losses, or lost
investment opportunity in situations where monies are moved by Trustee or
Employer, that are experienced by a Participant or Beneficiary in the investment
option(s) they select or are selected for them if they fail to take appropriate action in
regard to de-selected fund.
(c)
Designation of Fiduciaries. The Employer, Administrator and Trustee and the
persons they designate to carry out or help carry out their duties or responsibilities
are fiduciaries under the Plan. Each fiduciary has only those duties or responsibilities
specifically assigned to him under the Plan or delegated to him by another fiduciary.
Each fiduciary may assume that any direction, information of action of another
fiduciary is proper and need not inquire into the propriety of any such action,
direction or information. Except as provided by law, no fiduciary will be responsible
for the malfeasance, misfeasance or nonfeasance of any other fiduciary.
(d) Fiduciary Standards.
(1)
The Trustee and all other fiduciaries shall discharge their duties with respect
to this Plan solely in the interest of the Participants and Beneficiaries of the
Plan. Such duties shall be discharged for the exclusive purpose of providing
benefits to the Participants and Beneficiaries and defraying expenses of the
Plan.
(2)
All fiduciaries shall discharge their duties with the care, skill, prudence and
diligence under the circumstances then prevailing that a prudent person acting
in like capacity and familiar with such matters would use in the conduct of
an enterprise of a like character and with like aims, and as defined by
applicable State law.
(e)
Trustee's Power and Duties. The Trustee's powers and duties shall be those defined
under applicable State law.
This Plan and Investment and Trust Fund is intended to be exempt from taxation
under Section 501 (a) of the Internal Revenue Code ("Code") and intended to comply
with Section 457(g) of such code. The Trustee shall be empowered to submit or
designate appropriate agents to submit this Plan and Investment and Trust Fund to
the Internal Revenue Service for a determination of the eligibility of the Plan under
Section 457, and the exempt status of the Investment and Trust Fund under Section
501 (a), if the Trustees conclude that such a determination is desirable.
6.3
Investment Options. Each Participant may allocate his Deferred Compensation and
employer Contributions, if any, among the investment options, if any, provided under
the Plan. A Participant may change his investment options in accordance with rules
established by the Employer. Such modification may effect transfers of
Compensation already deferred and any Employer Contributions that may have
already been made from one investment option to another and/or may prospectively
change the investments to which future deferrals of Compensation and Employer
Contributions, if any, shall be allocated, effective as soon as practicable after the
Participant makes the change.
6.4
Account. The Employer shall maintain an Account for each Participant to which
shall be credited any Employer Contributions made for such Participant and such
Participant' s Deferred Compensation at such times as it would have been payable but
for the terms of his Participation Agreement. Each Participant's Account shall be
revalued at least quarterly to reflect the eamings, gains and losses creditable thereto
or debitable therefrom in accordance with the performance of the investment options
selected by the Participant pursuant to Subsections 4.4, 6.2 and 6.3. The earnings,
gains and losses creditable to or debitable from an Account shall mean the actual
earnings, gains and losses of each investment option, on a pro rata basis among the
Accounts of those Participants who selected that investment option.
Section 7. Distribution of Benefits.
7.1
Payments on Separation from Service. Subject to the provisions of Subsection 7.5,
upon a Participant's separation from service with the Employer for any reason
(including disability), the entire amount credited to his Account (less any federal,
state or local income tax required to be withheld therefrom) shall be paid to him in
a single lump sum immediately after the expiration of the Election Period; provided,
however, that during such Election Period a Participant (including a Participant who
has utilized the catch-up deferral provisions of Subsection 5.3(b) with an Account
balance in excess of an amount specified by the Employer, which amount shall not
exceed the amount specified in Section 457(e)(9)(A) of the Code, as the same may
be adjusted from time-to-time, may irrevocably elect in writing (on a form acceptable
to the Employer) a specific later date for first receiving payment under the Plan. In
addition, a Participant may elect a different method of payment as provided in
Subsection 7.2 by filing the appropriate form with the Employer no later than ninety
days prior to the Participant's elected payment date. The Account balance of a
Participant with less than the amount specified by the Employer in his Account at the
time of his separation from service shall be paid in a single lump sum to the
Participant (less applicable taxes) as soon as practicable following his separation
from service.
A Participant who has elected a specific later date for first receiving a payment under
the Plan, as set forth above, may elect to further defer the date upon which such
payment(s) will begin. Such election to further defer payment may be made only
once, to a later date, as long as payments have not yet begun when such election is
made.
7.2
Optional Forms of Benefit Payments. Subject to the provisions of Section 7.5, as an
alternative to payment in a lump sum, a Participant whose Account balance exceeds
the amount specified by the Employer under Subsection 7.1 above, may elect to
receive payment under the Plan in the form of substantially equal monthly, quarterly,
semiannual or annual installments for a period not to exceed the life expectancy
(which may be recalculated annually) of the Participant or the joint life expectancy
of the Participant and his Beneficiary; provided that no single payment (other than
the last scheduled payment) is specified less than $100.00. Any amount remaining
in the Participant's Account at the end of the specified period shall be paid in a single
lump sum payment. Altematively, such a Participant may elect an annuity under any
one of the settlement options offered in a commercial annuity contract purchased by
the Employer for the purpose of providing benefit payments for the life of the
Participant or the joint lives of the Participant and his Beneficiary and once begun,
7.3
7.4
periodic payments must be made not less frequently than annually, in a substantially
non-increasing amounts.
Emergency Withdrawals. Except as otherwise provided in Subsection 7.5,
distributions to or on behalf of a Participant shall be made only in the event of his
separation from service with the Employer, unless such Participant experiences an
unforeseeable emergency. "Unforeseeable emergency" means a severe financial
hardship to the Participant resulting from (a) a sudden unexpected illness or accident
of the Participant or a dependent of the Participant as defined in Section 152(a) of the
Code, (b) the Participant's loss of property due to casualty, or (c) other similar
extraordinary and unforeseeable circumstances arising as a result of events beyond
the control of the participant. Examples of events which may cause an
"unforeseeable emergency" are catastrophic illness, flood, fire, earthquake, death in
the family or disabling injury. Withdrawals will not be permitted for expenditures
normally budgetable, such as a down payment on a home, purchase of an automobile,
or education expenses. Withdrawal will not be allowed to the extent that the
hardship may be relieved (i) through reimbursement or compensation by insurance
or otherwise, (ii) by liquidation of the Participant's assets (to the extent such
liquidation would not itself cause severe financial hardship), or (iii) by cessation or
temporary suspension of deferrals under the Plan. Withdrawals of amounts because
of an unforeseeable emergency will be permitted only to the extent reasonably
needed to satisfy the emergency. Former Employees who have not yet received
distribution of their entire Account balances shall also be eligible for emergency
withdrawals under the same conditions as active Participants. A Participant or
former Employee who experiences such an unforeseeable emergency may apply to
the Employer for a withdrawal which shall be permitted, in the discretion of the
Employer, only to the extent it complies with the requirements of this Subsection 7.3.
Any amount approved hereunder for emergency withdrawal shall be paid to the
Participant in a single lump sum (less any applicable withholding taxes). The
withdrawal shall be effective at the later of the date specified in the Participant's
application or the date approved by the Employer.
Payments on the Death of a Participant.
Death After Benefit Commencement. If the Participant dies after having begun to
receive installment payments in accordance with Section 7.2, payment of the
remainder of such scheduled payments shall be suspended for a period of sixty days
after the Participant's death. During each sixty-day suspension period, the
Beneficiary of such Participant may elect, subject to the distribution requirements of
Subsection 7.5, to receive the balance then credited to the Participant's Account in
a single lump sum or in installments as specified under Section 7.2, provided that the
Participant's Account will be distributed to the Beneficiary at least as rapidly as
under the method of distribution being used prior to the Participant's death. If no
such election is made by the Beneficiary by the end of the sixty-day suspension
9
(b)
7.5
(a)
(b)
period, the remaining installment payments selected by the Participant (adjusted, if
necessary to comply with the distribution requirements of Subsection 7.5) shall be
paid to the Beneficiary.
Death Prior to Benefit Commencement. Subject to the provisions of Section 7.5, if
the Participant dies before distribution of his Account commences, his Beneficiary
shall receive distribution of such Participant's Account as provided under Section
7.1, treating the Beneficiary as if he were the Participant; provided, however, that if
the Beneficiary elects installment payments, the Participant' s entire Account shall be
distributed over a period not to exceed 15 years (or the life expectancy of the
Participant's surviving spouse, if such spouse is the Participant's Beneficiary).
Provisions Required Pursuant to Code Section 401(a)(9).
Timing and Amount of Required Distributions.
(1)
Notwithstanding any of the foregoing, distribution of a Participant's entire
Account shall commence not later than April 1 following the calendar year
in which he attains age 70 ½, whether or not the Participant has separated
from service with the Employer. Unless the form of distribution is a single
lump sum payment, distributions shall be made over a period not exceeding
the life expectancy of the participant, or the joint life expectancy of the
Participant and his Beneficiary.
(2)
If the Participant's entire Account is to be distributed in a form other than a
single lump sum payment, then the amount to be distributed each year must
be at least an amount equal to the quotient obtained by dividing the
Participant' s entire Account balance (determined as of the last valuation date
of the preceding calendar year) by the life expectancy of the Participant or (if
applicable) the joint life expectancy of the Participant and his designated
Beneficiary. Life expectancy and joint life expectancy shall be computed by
the use of the retum multiples contained in Section 1.72-9 of the Treasury
Regulations.
Distributions After Death.
(1)
If the Participant dies after having begun to receive installment payments in
accordance with Subsection 7.2, the remaining portion of such Participant's
Account shall continue to be distributed at least as rapidly as under the
method of distribution being used prior to the Participant's death.
(2)
If the Participant dies before distribution of his Account commences, the
Participant's entire Account shall be distributed in one of the distribution
10
(c)
7.6
7.7
options provided under Subsections 7.1 and 7.2 no later than December 31
of the calendar year which contains the fifth anniversary of the Participant's
death except:
(i) that if the beneficiary is not the participant's spouse, and such non-spousal
beneficiary elects to commence distribution by December 31, of the year
following the year the Participant died, such non-spousal beneficiary may
elect a periodic payment not exceeding 15 years, as set forth in Section 7.4(b)
above; or
(ii) that if the designated Beneficiary is the participant's surviving spouse,
such spouse may elect to receive distribution of the participant's entire
Account in substantially equal monthly, quarterly, semiannual or annual
installment payments over the life expectancy of the surviving spouse. Such
distributions are required to commence on or before the later of(i) December
31 of the calendar year immediately following the year in which the
Participant died, or (ii) December 31 of the calendar year in which the
Participant would have attained age 70 ½. If the spouse dies before such
payments begin, subsequent distributions shall be made as if the spouse had
been the Participant. For purposes of this subparagraph, payments will be
calculated by use of the return multiples specified in Section 1.72-9 of the
Treasury Regulations.
Interpretation. The provisions of this Subsection 7.5 shall override any
distribution option in the Plan that are inconsistent with this Subsection. All
distributions under the Plan shall be made in accordance with Treasury
Regulations issued under Section 401(a)(9) of the Code. The provisions of
this Subsection shall be effective as of January 1, 1989.
Effect of Reemployment. If a Participant who separates from service again
becomes an Employee. no distributions shall be made or continued to the
Participant while he is so employed. Any amounts which the Participant was
entitled to receive on his prior separation from service shall be held until the
Participant or his Beneficiary is again entitled to a distribution under the
terms of the Plan.
De Minimis Distributions. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan,
if the Participant has not deferred any amount for a 2-year period and the total
amount of the Participant's Account under the Plan does not exceed $5,000,
a Participant may elect to receive, or the Plan may elect to distribute without
the Participant's consent, the entire value of the Participant's Account in a
lump sum distribution. No subsequent distribution under this provision to
such Participant may be made, once such distribution occurs.
11
Section 8.
Section 9.
9.1
9.2
9.3
(a)
(b)
Nonassignability: The interest of a Participant or Beneficiary in the
contractual obligation established by the Plan, shall not be assignable in
whole or in part, directly or by operation of law or otherwise, in any manner.
Miscellaneous:
No Effect on Employment. Neither the establishment of the Plan nor any
modification thereof, nor the establishment of an Account, nor any agreement
between the Employer and the Custodian, nor the payment of any benefits,
shall be construed as giving to any Participant or other person any legal or
equitable right against the Employer except as herein provided, and in no
event shall the terms of employment of the Employee or Participant be
modified or in any way affected hereby.
Construction. This Plan shall be construed, administered and enforced
according to the Constitution and laws of the State of California.
Plan-to-Plan Transfers. Plan-to-plan transfers shall be permitted as follows:
Transfers from Plan. To the extent and in the manner permitted under
Section 457(e)(10) of the Code and the Treasury Regulations thereunder, the
balance in the Account of a Participant who is no longer an Employee and
who subsequently becomes a participant in another eligible deferred
compensation plan under Section 457(b) of the Code shall be transferred to
his account in the plan of his new employer; provided that such plan provides
for the receipt of such transferred amounts. If a Participant's Account has
been transferred to such plan, the Participant shall not be entitled to receive
any benefit under this Plan, notwithstanding anything in this Plan to the
contrary.
l ranst~rs to Plan. If prior to becoming an Employee, an individual
participated in another eligible deferred compensation plan under Section
457(b) of the Code, the Employer may in its discretion accept transfer of any
amount credited to the deferred compensation account of such Employee
under that plan and, in the event of such transfer, shall establish for the
Employee an Account under the Plan to which such amount shall be treated
as an amount deferred under and subject to the terms of the Plan, except that
no amount so transferred will be taken into account in applying the deferral
limitations set forth in Subsection 5.1.
12
Section 10.
Section 11.
10.1
10.2
11.1
11.2
(a)
Amendment and Termination:
Amendment and Termination. The Employer may at any time and from time
to time by action of its governing or appointing board as evidenced by an
instrument in writing duly executed by the Employer modify, amend,
suspend, or terminate the Plan in whole or part (including retroactive
amendments) or cease deferring Compensation pursuant to the Plan for some
or all Participants. In the event of such an action, the Employer shall deliver
to each affected Participant a notice of such modification, amendment or
termination or a notice that it shall cease deferring Compensation; provided,
however, that the Employer shall not have the right to reduce or affect the
value modification, amendment, termination or cessation.
Interpretation. This Plan is intended to qualify as an eligible deferred
compensation plan under Section 457 of the Code, and shall be interpreted
and administered in a manner consistent with such qualification. The
Employer reserves the right to amend the Plan to the extent that it may be
necessary to conform the Plan to the requirements of Section 457 of the Code
an any other applicable law, regulation or ruling, including amendments that
are retroactive to the effective date of the Plan. In the event that the Plan is
deemed by the Intemal Revenue Service to be administered in a manner
inconsistent with Section 457 of the Code, the Employer shall correct such
administration within the period provided in Section 457 of the Code. The
Employer reserves the right to take such action and do such things as are
required to make the Plan, as administered, consistent with Section 457 of the
Code.
Plan Administration:
Administration. The Plan shall be administered by the Employer, which may
recommend rules and regulations for the administration of the Plan consistent
with the terms of the Plan. All rules and regulations recommended by the
Employer shall be final and conclusive upon adoption by resolution of the
governing or appointing board of the Employer.
Powers. The Employer shall have all powers to perform all duties necessary
to exercise its functions including, but not limited to, the:
Determination of Employee' s eligibility, participation and benefits under the
Plan;
13
Establishment and maintenance of written records showing at any time the
interest of a Participant in his book Account.
(c) Interpretation and construction of the provisions of the Plan;
(d)
Direction of the Employer (or the Trustee on behalf of the Employer) to make
disbursement of benefits under the Plan;
(e)
Appointment of such agents, advisors, counselors and delegates including an
Administrator as may be necessary and appropriate for the administration and
operation of this Plan and the delegation to such agent, advisors, counselors
and delegates of any of its discretionary and ministerial powers and duties in
accordance with this Section; and
(f)
Composition of any provision to Participants of all forms as described in this
Plan.
11.3
Revocability of Administrative Action. Any action taken by the Employer
with respect to the rights or benefits under the Plan of any person shall be
revocable by the Employer as to payments or distributions not therefore made
pursuant to such actions and appropriate adjustments may be made in future
payments or distributions to a Participant or Beneficiary to offset any excess
payment or underpayment theretofore made to such Participant or
Beneficiary.
Section 12.
Gender and Plurals. The masculine gender shall include the feminine and
neuter, the masculine pronoun shall include the feminine and neuter. the
singular number the plural, and conversely, whenever appropriate.
14
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
December 12, 1998
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Mike Olivier, Senior Civil Engineer
APPROVAL TO APPROPRIATE $191,736.00 FROM TRUST ACCOUNT FUND
NO. 70-276-477 FOR UNDERGROUNDING OF THE EXISTING OVERHEAD
UTILITY LINES ALONG HIGHLAND AVENUE EAST OF ETIWANDA
AVENUE IN CONJUNCTION WITH FREEWAY UTILITY RELOCATION
PROJECT
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve the appropriation of $191,736.00 from Trust
Account Fund No. 70-276-477 for undergrounding of the existing overhead utility lines along
Highland Avenue east of Etiwanda Avenue in conjunction with the freeway utility relocation project.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
During the construction of the Route 30 Freeway, it is necessary to relocate the overhead utilities
along Highland Avenue from Etiwanda to west of Locust Avenue. Currently, a development north
of Highland Avenue is conditioned to underground approximately 1300 feet of overhead utilities
along Highland Avenue. By utilizing previously paid in-lieu fees from the City's Trust Account No.
70-276-477 for undergrounding in this reach, and combining the development's required
undergrounding, it is more economical to underground the entire reach from Etiwanda Avenue to
west of Locust Avenue than to have the facilities relocated. The developer has indicated an
eagerness to participate.
Respectfully Submitted, .
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:MO:sd
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
December 2, 1998
TO:
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM:
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY
SUBJECT:
Henry Murakoshi, Associate Engineer
APPROVAL OF THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY FOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS AT MODEL SITE RELATED TO
TENTATIVE TRACT 15072, GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST
CORNER OF ROCHESTER AVENUE AND BASE LINE ROAD, SUBMITTED BY
LEWIS DEVELOPMENT CO.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject agreement and
security related to Tentative Tract Map No. 1 $072 and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign
said agreement.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Tentative Tract Map No. 15072, generally located at the southwest comer of Rochester Avenue and Base
Line Road, was approved by the Planning Commission of the 24~ day of June, 1998, for a residential
subdivision of 545 single family lots on 90 acres of land in the Low Medium Residential Designation
within the Terra Vista Community Plan.
Lewis Development Co., desire to commence construction on streets at model site of Tentative Tract
15072 prior to approval of final map.
The Developer, Lewis Development Co., a California Corporation, is submitting an agreement and security
to guarantee the construction of the improvements in the following amounts.
Faithful Performance Bond: $493,200
Labor and Materialmen Bond: $246,600
Copies of the agreement and security signed by the Developer are available in the City Clerk's office.
Respectfully Submitted,
City Engineer
WJO:HM:dlw
~Attachments
z
i
I
I
I
i I
i
!
RESOLUTION NO. q ~"',::2/'~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY FOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS AT MODEL SITE,
RELATED TO TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 15072
WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 15072, submitted by Lewis Development Co., a
California Corporation, consisting of 545 lots, generally located at the southwest comer of Rochester
Avenue and Base Line Road, was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga on June 24, 1998; and
WHEREAS, Lewis Development Co., desire to commence construction on streets at model
site Tentative Tract 15072 prior to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City and
provide an Improvement Agreement guaranteed by acceptable Improvement Security, by Lewis
Development Co., a California Corporation, as developer; and
WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement
Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of
said real property as referred to Tentative Tract Map No. 15072.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, HEREBY RESOLVES that said Improvement Agreement and said
Improvement Security submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the
Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga and the City Clerk to attest.
ORDINANCE NO. 522A
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE
AMENDMENT 98-03, AMENDING CHAPTERS 17.08 AND 17.10
OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE,
REGARDING TRIP REDUCTION REQUIREMENTS, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
RECITALS.
1. On September 23, 1998, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing with respect to the above
referenced Development Code Amendment. Following the conclusion of said public
hearing, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 98-74, thereby
recommending that the City Council adopt Development Code Amendment 98-03.
2. On November 18, 1998, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing prior to the
adoption of this Ordinance.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.
B. ORDINANCE.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ordains as follows:
SECTION 1: This Council hereby specifies and finds that all of the facts set forth
in the Recitals, Part A, of the Ordinance are true and correct.
SECTION 2:
This Council hereby finds and certifies that the proposed
amendment has been reviewed and considered in compliance with
the California Environmental Act (CEQA) of 1970, and determines
that the proposed amendment will help to improve air quality, and
therefore the amendment is categorically exempt from environmental
review provisions of the California Environmental Act (CEQA) per
Section 15308 of the CEQA Guidelines, and further this Council
hereby directs the City Clerk to file a Notice of Exemption pursuant
to CEQA Guidelines, Section 15062, regarding this matter.
SECTION 3: The text of Section 17.08.030.E.8 is hereby deleted.
SECTION 4: The text of Section 17.010.030.F.7 is hereby deleted.
SECTION 5: The text of Section 17.10.070.B is hereby deleted.
Ordinance No. 522A
Page 2
SECTION 6:
SECTION 7:
The City Council declares that, should any provision, section,
paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance be rendered or
declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent
jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining
provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences, and words of this
Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect.
The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this ordinance and shall
cause the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at
least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general
circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated
in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 2nd day of December, 1998.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAINED:
ATTEST:
William J. Alexander, Mayor
Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk
I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the Council
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 18th day of November, 1998, and was finally passed
at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 2nd day of
December, 1998.
Executed this 3rd day of December, 1998, at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk
ORDINANCE NO. 414B
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA AMENDING CHAPTER 10.68 OF TITLE
10 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE
PERTAINING TO THE USE OF SPRUCE AVENUE PARK SKATE
FACILITY
THE CITY COUNCIL OF CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: Section 10.68.060 of Chapter 10.68 of Title 10 of the Rancho
Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby deleted.
SECTION 2:
A new Section 10.68.060 is hereby added to Chapter 10.68 of Title
10 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to read as follows:
"10.68.060 Regulations Applicable to Spruce Avenue
Park Skate Facility.
"A. Spruce Avenue Park Skate Facility is designed and
maintained, and is hereby designated as, a skateboard
park in which skateboarding, in-line skating and roller
skating is permitted pursuant to the provisions of this
Section 10.68.060.
"B. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Chapter,
every person riding a skateboard, or utilizing in-line
skates or roller skates at Spruce Avenue Park Skate
Facility must: (1) wear a fully-functional helmet, elbow
pads, and knee pads while utilizing the Facility; (2) be
supervised by an adult if under the age of fourteen (14);
and (3) comply with all posted rules and regulations."
SECTION 3:
Prior to commencing enforcement hereof, the Director of Community
Development, or a designee thereof, is hereby directed to post signs
affording reasonable notice to users of Spruce Avenue Park Skate
Facility of the following: (1) any person utilizing the Facility must
wear a functional helmet, elbow pads, and knee pads and be
supervised by an adult if under the age of fourteen (14); (2)
skateboarding, in-line skating and/or roller skating is deemed to be
a hazardous activity and the City of Rancho Cucamonga may not be
liable for injuries incurred by persons who participate in any such
hazardous activity; and (3) failure to comply with these regulations
and/or any other posted regulations will subject the violator to
citation.
The Director is authorized to set forth any other rules and regulations
which he or she deems appropriate in signs providing the notice
described above.
Ordinance No. 4141B
Page 2
SECTION 4.
SECTION 5.
SECTION 6.
SECTION 7.
Penalties. A violation of this Ordinance, or the section hereby
adopted, shall constitute an infraction and shall be punishable
therefor as set forth in Section 1.12.030 of this Code.
Severability. The City Council declares that, should any provision,
section, paragraph, sentence or word of this Ordnance be rendered
or declared invalid by any final court action in a court or competent
jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining
provision, sections, paragraphs, sentences and words of this
Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect.
Civil Remedies Available. A violation of any of the provisions of
this Ordinance, or the section adopted hereby, shall constitute a
nuisance and may be abated by the City through civil process by
means of restraining order, preliminary or permanent injunction, or
in any other manner provided by law for the abatement of such
nuisances.
The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause
the same to be published within fifteen days after its passage at
least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general
circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated
in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 2°" day of December, 1998.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAINED:
William J. Alexander, Mayor
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
December 2, 1998
TO:
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM:
Brad Buller, City Planner
BY:
Alan Warren, AICP, Associate Planner
SUBJECT:
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 98-04 -
RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - A request to change the
General Plan Land Use Map from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre)
and Civic/Community to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for 17
acres of land on the north side of Base Line Road, approximately 1,300 feet east of the
intersection of Rochester Avenue - APN: 0227-091-18 through 21.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN
AMENDMENT 98-03 - RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - A
request to change the Victoria Community Plan Land Use Map from Medium
Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and Community Facility to Low-Medium
Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for 17 acres of land on the north side of Base
Line Road, approximately 1,300 feet east of the intersection of Rochester Avenue -
APN: 0227-091-18 through 21.
Because there are smaller, similarly zoned, out parcels adjacent to the parcels included in these
applications, staff recommends that General Plan Amendment 98-05 and Victoria Community
Plan Amendment 98-04 be reviewed concurrently.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission recommends adoption of the attached Resolution approving General Plan
Amendment No. 98°04 and the Ordinance adopting Victoria Community Plan Amendment No. 98-03.
BACKGROUND
The subject applications were filed by the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency (RDA) for
properties owned by the agency, located on the north side of Base Line Road, east of Rochester
Avenue. The Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing on the subject applications
on October 28, and continued to November 11, 1998. No written or oral opposition to the land use
amendment was received.
The Etiwanda School District did advise City staff of its concerns regarding any additional residential
development that could impact the District's ability to provide educational services. The Planning
Commission concurred with staffs analysis that these amendments should significantly lessen the
anticipated impacts when development occurs because of the reduction in residential unit density.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
GPA 98-04 & VCPA 98-03 - CITY OF R.C. RDA
December 2, 1998
Page 2
Staff recommends that the City Council identify, through minute action, the need for future developers
of the properties to execute an agreement with the Etiwanda School District to provide adequate
mitigation prior to City approval of any residential project.
The Planning Commission concurs with staff that the requested Low-Medium Residential use range
of 4-8 dwelling units per acre, is compatible with the surrounding land uses. Also, the Commission
finds that the site is suitable in size for the requested land use change. Because of the small adjoining
parcels on the east and west sides of the site, Planning Commission initiated land use applications for
the same residential density are accompanying these RDA applications. With the land use changes,
a "Master Plan" requirement is also recommended to ensure that the development proposal of each
parcel is reviewed within a coordinated planning process.
Therefore, the Planning Commission recommends approval of General Plan Amendment 98°04, with
a Master Plan requirement, and Victoria Community Plan Amendment 98-03 (see attached Planning
Commission Staff Report dated November 10, 1998; Adopted Resolution Nos. 98-84'and 98-85; and
the associated meeting minutes.)
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
The Planning Commission finds that there will be no environmental impacts resulting from the
requested land use amendment and recommends adoption of a Negative Declaration.
CORRESPONDENCE
This item was advertised as a public hearing in theInland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property
was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the project site.
ACTION
If the City Council concurs with the recommendations of the Planning Commission and staff, it would
be appropriate to adopt the attached Resolution of Approval for General Plan Amendment No. 98-04
and the attached Ordinance adopting Victoria Community Plan Amendment No. 98-03.
Brad Buller
City Planner
BB:AW/jfs
Attachments:
Planning Commission Staff Report dated November 10, 1998
Planning Commission Minutes dated November 10, 1998 (draft)
Planning Commission Resolutions Nos. 98-84 and 98-85
Resolution Approving GPA 98-04
Ordinance Adopting VCPA 98-03
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FLANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT 98-04, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE GENERAL PLAN
LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS
PER ACRE) AND CIVIC/COMMUNITY TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL
(4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), WITH A MASTER PLAN
REQUIREMENT, FOR 17 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE NORTH
SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 1,300 FEET EAST OF THE
INTERSECTION OF ROCHESTER AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0227-091-18 THROUGH 21.
A. Recitals.
1. The Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency (RDA) filed an application for General
Plan Amendment No. 98-04 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this
Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application."
2. On October 28, and continued to November 10, 1998, the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. On
November 10, 1998, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the application to the City
Council.
3. On December 2, 1998, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted
a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part
A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-
referenced public hearing, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony,
this Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to four parcels of land totaling approximately 17 acres of
land, basically a rectilinear configuration, located on the north side of Base Line Road,
approximately 1,300 feet east of the intersection of Rochester Avenue and which are presently
vacant. Said properties are currently designated as Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per
acre) and Civic/Community; and
b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated Low-Medium Residential
(4-8 dwelling units per acre) and is vacant with an unused railroad right-of-way. The property to the
west is designated Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with a fire
station. The property to the east is designated Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per
acre) and is vacant and partially developed with a public storage facility. The property to the south,
on the south side of Base Line Road, is designated Commercial and is vacant; and
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
GPA 98-04 - CITY OF R.C. RDA
December 2, 1998
Page 2
c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan
and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and
with related development; and
d. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives ofthe Land Use Element; and
e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent
properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding
properties.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-
referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2
above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. That the subject properties are suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed
district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land uses in the surrounding area;
and
b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the
environment nor the surrounding properties; and
c. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan.
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration,
together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the
application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a
significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration based upon the findings
as follows:
a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California
Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated
thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the
independent judgment of the City Council; and, further, this Council has reviewed and considered
the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application.
b. That, based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into
the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur.
c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of
Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study
and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have
potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends.
Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports
and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council during the public hearing, the City
Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title
14 of the California Code of Regulations.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Council hereby approves General Plan Amendment No. 98-04 to change the General Plan Land
Use Map for the subject properties to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), as
shown on the attached Exhibit "A," with a Master Plan requirement.
6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
LAND USE PLAN
RESIDENTIAL
VERY LOW <2 DU's/AC
LOW 2-4 DU's/AC
LOW-MEDIUM 4-8 DU's/AC
MEDIUM 8-14 DU's/AC
MEDIUM-HIGH 14-24 DU's/AC
HIGH 24-30 DU's/AC
MASTER PLAN REQUIRED
COMMERCIAL/OFFICE
COMMERCIAL
I _:~ COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL
F~ NEIGHBORHOOD COMM,
~ REGIONAL COMMERCIAL
f::::Z,~:i~ OFFICE
OPEN SPACE
L-~,., HILLSIDE
RESIDENTIAL
__1 I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I
IIIIIIIII
--IIIIIIIIII
OPEN SPACE
FLOOD CONTROL/UTILITY CORb. '"""'"'
:.:.:.:.'.'
SPECIAL BOULEVARD
C FACILITIES
EXISTING SCHOOLS
PROPOSED SCHOOLS'
PARKS '(EXISTING PARKS SHOWN 'P')
CIVIC/COMMUNITY
CITY OF RANCHO
GENERAL PLAN
Foothill alvd:
CUCAMONGA
::::".i: ':':':':':
';;;:: ............ '.'.'.'.'.
Project:
Title:
Exhibit: A Date:
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN
AMENDMENT 98-03, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE VICTORIA
COMMUNITY PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14
DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND COMMUNITY FACILITY TO LOW-
MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 17
ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BASE LINE
ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 1,300 FEET EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF
ROCHESTER AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORTTHEREOF
- APN: 0227-091-18 THROUGH 21.
A. Recitals.
1. The Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency filed an application for Victoria
Community Plan Amendment No. 98-03 as described in the title of this Ordinance. Hereinafter in
this Ordinance, the subject Victoria Community Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application."
2. On October 28, and continued to November 10, 1998, the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
3. On November 10, 1998, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
recommended approval of the associated General Plan Amendment No. 98-04 to change the
General Plan Land Use Map from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and
Civic/Community to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre).
4. On November 10, 1998, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the
application to the City Council.
5. On December 2, 1998, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved
associated General Plan Amendment No. 98-04 to change the General Plan Land Use Map from
Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and Civic/Community to Low-Medium Residential
(4-8 dwelling units per acre).
6. On December 2, 1998, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted
a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
7. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.
B. Ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and ordained by the City Council of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part
A, of this Ordinance are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-
referenced public hearing, including written and oral staff reports, together with 'public testimony,
this Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
VCPA 98-03 - CITY OF R.C. RDA
December 2, 1998
Page 2
a. The application applies to four parcels of land totaling approximately 17 acres,
basically a rectilinear configuration, located on the north side of Base Line Road, approximately
1,300 feet east of the intersection of Rochester Avenue and which is presently vacant. Said
properties are currently designated as Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and
Community Facility; and
b. All of the surrounding properties are within the Victoria Planned Community. The
property to the north of the subject site is designated Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units
per acre) and is vacant with an unused railroad right-of-way. The property to the west is designated
Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with a fire station. The property
to the east is designated Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and is vacant and
partially developed with a public storage facility. The property to the south, on the south side of
Base Line Road, is designated Regionally Related Commercial and is vacant; and
c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan
and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan,
the Victoria Community Plan, and with related development; and
d. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the General Plan Land Use
Element and the Victoria Community Plan; and
e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent
properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding
properties.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-
referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2
above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district
in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land uses in the surrounding area; and
b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the
environment nor the surrounding properties; and
c. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan.
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration,
together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the
application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a
significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration based upon the findings
as follows:
a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California
Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated
thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the
independent judgment of the City Council; and, further, this Council has reviewed and considered
the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application.
b. That, based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into
the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur.
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
VCPA 98-03 - CITY OF R.C. RDA
December 2, 1998
Page 3
c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of
Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study
and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have
potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends.
Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports
and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council during the public hearing, the City
Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title
14 of the California Code of Regulations.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Council hereby approves Victoria Community Plan Amendment No. 98-03 to change the Land
Use Map for the subject properties to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), as
shown on the attached Exhibit "A."
6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance.
RESIDEI~q'IA L
L Low Density (2-~ DU/AC)
I.~1 Low Medium Density (4-8 DU/AC)
M Medium Density (8-14 DU/AC)
MH Medium High Densit)' (14-24 DU/AC)
H High Densit.,,' (24-30 DU/AC)
COMMERCIAL
CC Community Commercial
CF Community Facility
Neighborhood Commercial
OP Office Park
RC Recreational Commercial
RRC Regional Related Center
RR Regional Related OfficeYCommercial
VC Village Commercial
MIXED USE
MFC Financial. Restaurants. Residenual
MHO Hospital & Related Facilities, Off'me
PUBLIC & QUASI-PUBLIC
ItS
Victoria Park
!
M
E Elementa. D' School
JEll Junior High School
HS High School
P Parks
SBCFC San Bernardino County Flood Con~'ol LM
UC Utility Corridor
CITY OF R,~Ne.~O, ,.~UCAMONGA
Ln
M
LM
S.B.C.F.C.
~Base I~ine RCdT--~-[
Project:
Title:
Exhibit:
d
LM
LM
P
LM
L
LM
LM
M
VC
H
M
Date:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
December 2, 1998
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
Brad Buller, City Planner
Alan Warren, AICP, Associate Planner
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 98-05 -
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -A request to change the General Plan Land
Use Map from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium
Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for approximately 6 acres of land on the
north side of Base Line Road, approximately 1,100 feet east of the intersection of
Rochester Avenue ~ APN: 0227-091-22 and 25
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN
AMENDMENT 98-04 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to change the
Victoria Community Plan Land Use Map from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling
units per acre) to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for
approximately 6 acres of land on the north side of Base Line Road, approximately
1,100 feet east of the intersection of Rochester Avenue and for 2'~ acres of land
approximately 2,000 feet east of the intersection of Rochester Avenue
APN: 0227-091-22, 25, and 43.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission recommends adoption of the attached Resolution approving General
Plan Amendment No. 98-05 and Ordinance adopting Victoria Community Plan Amendment No.
98-04.
BACKGROUND
The subject applications were initiated by the Planning Commission in response to land use
changes filed by the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency (RDA) for properties owned by
the agency, located on the north side of Base Line Road, east of Rochester Avenue. The properties
contained in the City applications border the RDA properties on the east and west sides. The
Planning Commission and staff felt that it was important to consider the land use of these smaller
parcels in the context of the larger RDA parcels.
The Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing on the subject applications on
November 10, 1998. No written or oral opposition to the land use changes was received. The
owners of the application properties were notified by mail of the Planning Commission's intent to
consider rezoning each parcel and of the hearing date.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
GPA 98-05 & VCPA 98-04 - CITY OF R.C.
December 2, 1998
Page 2
The Planning Commission concurs with staff that the requested Low-Medium Residential use range
of 4-8 dwelling units per acre is compatible with the surrounding land uses. Also, the Commission
finds that the site is suitable in size, if part of a master planning process of the larger RDA
properties, for the requested land use change. Because there are small adjoining parcels on the
east and west sides of the RDA site, the Planning Commission initiated land use applications for
the same residential density as the accompanying RDA applications. With the land use changes,
a "Master Plan" requirement is also recommended to ensure that the development proposal of each
parcel is reviewed within a coordinated planning process.
Therefore, the Planning Commission recommends approval of General Plan Amendment 98-05 with
a Master Plan requirement and Victoria Community Plan Amendment 98-04 (see attached Planning
Commission Staff Report dated November 10, 1998; Adopted Resolution Nos. 98-86 and 98-87;
and associated meeting minutes.)
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
The Planning Commission finds that there will be no environmental impacts resulting from the
requested land use change and recommends adoption of a Negative Declaration.
CORRESPONDENCE
This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the
property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the
project site.
ACTION
If the City Council concurs with the recommendations of the Planning Commission and staff, it would
be appropriate to adopt the attached Resolution of Approval for General Plan Amendment No.
98-05 and the attached Ordinance for the approval of Victoria Community Plan Amendment
No. 98-04.
Respectfully submitted,
City Planner
BB:AW/jfs
Attachments: Planning Commission Staff Report dated November 10, 1998
Planning Commission Minutes dated November 10, 1998 (draft)
Planning Commission Resolutions Nos. 98-86 and 98-87
Resolution Approving GPA 98-05
Ordinance Adopting VCPA 98-04
LAND USE PLAN
RESIDENTIAL
VERY LOW <2 DU's/AC
LOW 2-4 DU's/AC
LOW-MEDIUM 4-8 DU's/AC
MEDIUM 8-14 DU's/AC
MEDIUM-HIGH 14-24 DU's/AC
HIGH 24-30 DU's/AC
MASTER PLAN REQUIRED
COMMERCIAL/OFFICE
COMMERCIAL
i :1 COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL
I- ~--I NEIGHBORHOOD COMM.
[¢:..,~ REGIONAL COMMERCIAL
f::::::::::i.: OFFICE
OPEN SPACE
E-'-;:~ HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL
OPEN SPACE .. ............
FLOOD CONTROL/UTILITY C ' '"""""
o o. ,,,..,,,.,,, '
SPECIAL BOULEVARD .-,-,',',','
PUBLIC FACILITIES
l_~:~d EXISTING SCHOOLS .... .... .. ,.-
l(~i/.~PROPOSED SCHOOLS'
I:.~;_:~PARKS '(EXISTING PARKS SHOWN 'P')
L_ ,__1CIVIC/COMMUNITY
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
GENERAL PLAN
Project: ~7-qP/~ ~f8-o% ¢~ o,~
Title'
Exhibit' /~ Date'
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT 98-05, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE GENERAL PLAN
LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS
PER ACRE) TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER
ACRE), WITH A MASTER PLAN REQUIREMENT, FOR 6 ACRES OF
LAND, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD,
APPROXIMATELY 1,100 FEET EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF
ROCHESTER AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
- APN: 0227-091-22 AND 25.
A. Recitals.
1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has authorized the filing of an
application for General Plan Amendment No. 98-05 as described in the title of this Resolution.
Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the
application."
2. On November 10, 1998, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and recommended approval of the
application to the City Council.
3. On December 2, 1998, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted
a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part
A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-
referenced public hearing on December 2, 1998, including written and oral staff reports, together
with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to two parcels of land totaling approximately 6 acres,
basically a rectilinear configuration, located on the north side of Base Line Road, approximately
1,100 feet east of the intersection of Rochester Avenue and is presently developed with a fire
station. Said properties are currently designated as Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per
acre); and
b. The properties to the north of the subject site are designated Low-Medium
Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and are vacant with an unused railroad right-of-way.
The property to the west is designated Flood Control/Utility Corridor and is developed with
electrical transmission lines and flood control channels. The property to the east is designated
Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and is vacant. The property to the south, on
the south side of Base Line Road, is designated as Commercial and is vacant; and
9'7
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
GPA 98-05 - CITY OF R.C.
December 2, 1998
Page 2
c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General
Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General
Plan and with related development; and
and
This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element;
e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent
properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding
properties.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-
referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and
2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed
district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land uses in the surrounding area
by including a Master Plan designation requirement with adjacent properties; and
b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the
environment nor the surrounding properties; and
c. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan.
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative
Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment
for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will
have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration based upon
the findings as follows:
a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines
promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore
reflect the independent judgment of the City Council; and, further, this Council has reviewed and
considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application.
b. That, based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated
into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur.
c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code
of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial
Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project
will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources orthe habitat upon which wildlife
depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the
staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council during the public
hearing, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section
753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above,
this Council hereby approves General Plan Amendment No. 98-05 to change the General Plan
Land Use Map for the subject properties to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per
acre), as shown on the attached Exhibit "A," with a Master Plan requirement.
6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance.
ORDINANCE NO. ~ ~..~'
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN
AMENDMENT 98-04, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE VICTORIA
COMMUNITY PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14
DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8
DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 6 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON
THE NORTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 1,100 FEET
EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF ROCHESTER AVENUE AND FOR 2½
ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BASE LINE
ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 2,000 FEET EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF
ROCHESTER AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
- APN: 0227-091-22, 25, AND 43
A. Recitals.
1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has authorized the filing of an
application for Victoria Community Plan Amendment No. 98-04 as described in the title of this
Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Victoria Community Plan Amendment is
referred to as "the application."
2. On November 10, 1998, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
recommended approval of the associated General Plan Amendment No. 98-05 to change the
General Plan Land Use Map from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium
Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for the properties 1,100 feet east of Rochester Avenue.
3. On November 10, 1998, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and recommended approval of the
application to the City Council.
4. On December 2, 1998 the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved the
associated General Plan Amendment No. 98-05 to change the General Plan Land Use Map from
Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units
per acre) for the properties 1,100 feet east of Rochester Avenue.
5. On December 2, 1998, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted
a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
6. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.
B. Ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and ordained by the City Council of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part
A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-
referenced public hearing on December 2, 1998, including written and oral staff reports, together
with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
VCPA 98-04 - CITY OF R.C.
December 2, 1998
Page 2
a. The application applies to two parcels of land totaling approximately 6 acres and
one 2~ acre parcel, all of which are basically rectilinear in configuration. The first two parcels
(6 acres) are located on the north side of Base Line Road, approximately 1,100 feet east of the
intersection of Rochester Avenue and are presently developed with a fire station and the third parcel
(2~ acres) is located on the north side of Base Line Road, approximately 2,000 feet east of the
intersection of Rochester Avenue and is vacant. Said properties are currently designated as
Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre); and
b. All of the surrounding properties are within the Victoria Planned Community. For
the parcel 1,100 feet east of Rochester Avenue, the properties to the north are designated
Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and are vacant with an unused railroad
right-of-way. The property to the west is designated Utility Corridor and is developed with electrical
transmission lines and flood control channels. The property to the east is designated Medium
Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and is vacant. The property to the south, on the south
side of Base Line Road, is designated Regionally Related Commercial and is vacant. For the parcel
2,000 feet east of Rochester Avenue, the properties to the north are designated Low-Medium
Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and are vacant with an unused railroad right-of-way. The
property to the west is currently designated Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and
is being changed to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) with the approval of
Victoria Community Plan Amendment 98-03 and is vacant. The property to the east is designated
Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and is vacant. The property to the south, on the
south side of Base Line Road, is designated Regionally Related Commercial and is vacant; and
c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan
and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan,
the Victoria Community Plan, and with related development; and
d. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the General Plan Land Use
Element and the Victoria Community Plan; and
e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent
properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding
properties.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-
referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2
above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. That the subject properties are suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed
district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land uses in the surrounding area by
a General Plan Master Plan designation with adjacent properties; and
b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the
environment nor the surrounding properties; and
c. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan.
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration,
together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the
application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a
significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration based upon the findings
as follows:
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
VCPA 98-04 - CITY OF R.C.
December 2, 1998
Page 3
a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California
Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated
thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the
independent judgment of the City Council; and, further, this Council has reviewed and considered
the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application.
b. That, based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into
the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur.
c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of
Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study
and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have
potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends.
Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports
and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council during the public hearing, the City
Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title
14 of the California Code of Regulations.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Council hereby approves Victoria Community Plan Amendment No. 98-04 to change the Land
Use Map for the subject properties to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) as
shown on the attached Exhibit "A."
6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 2ND DAY OF DECEMBER 1998.
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
William Alexander, Mayor
ATTEST:
Debra Adams, City Clerk
I, Debra Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the City Council of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 2nd day of December
1998, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
I:\FINAL\JEANENNE\VCPA 98-04 Ord 12-2.ord
J/
RESID ENTI. A L
L
LM
M
MH
tl
Medium Denrsitv (8-1,1 DU/AC)
Medium Hit~ bensky (1a,-24 DU/AC)
High Density (2,-1-30 DU/AC)
COMMERCIAL
Community Commercial
Community Facility
Neighborhb'od Commercial
Office Pask
Recreational Commercial
Regional Related Center
Regional Related OfficeJCummercial
Village Commercial
CC
CF
NC
OP
RC
RRC
RR
VC
MIXED USE
~ ~ Victoria Park Ln
Lo~' Density (2-4 DU/AC)
Low Medium Densky (4.8 DU/AC)
MFC Financial. Restaurants. Residential
MHO Hospital & Related Facilities. Office
PUBLIC & QUASI.PUBLIC
M
E ElementzO' School
J POt Junior High School
HS His School
P Parks
SBCFC San Bernardino County Flood Control LM
UC Utility Corridor
)
M
LM
S.B.C.F.C.
Project:
Title:
Exhibit:
VcP8
LM
LM
P
LM
L
LM
LM
M
H
MH
M . P
Date'
DATE:
TO:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
December 2, 1998
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM:
Brad Buller, City Planner
BY:
Nancy Fong, AICP, Senior Planner
SUBJECT:
AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION REGARDING THE
LA FOURCADE ARCH UNDER CUP 91-24 - MASI COMMERCE PARTNERS -A
request to appeal the Planning Commission's decision in denying the change in
location of placing the La Fourcade Arch - APN: 229-011-39.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the City Council continue the appeal for 60 days as requested by the applicant.
BACKGROUND
At the meeting on August 12, 1998, the Planning Commission reviewed, for the first time, the
applicant's request to relocate the La Fourcade arch to a recessed area at the west elevation of
Building 5. The Commission did not approve the request because the proposed location was not
suitable as it was along the back side of the building. However, the Commission indicated that they
would be willing to work with the applicant in reviewing alternate locations. Subsequently, the
applicant proposed placing the La Fourcade arch on a pedestal within the landscaped area at the
north side of Building 5 parallel to Foothill Boulevard. In reviewing the request at the meeting on
October 28, the Commission raised concerns that the La Fourcade arch was not protected from
vandalism and the plans were inadequate in showing how the building entry design would be
modified without the arch above. The Commission did not approve the second proposal. The
applicant timely appealed the Commission's decision.
Staff has been meeting with the applicant to review the issues. At the last meeting on November
23, 1998, the applicant indicated to staff that he would like to have another opportunity to work with
the Commission in resolving their concerns regarding the proposed placement of the arch.
Attached is a copy of the letter requesting a continuance.
City Planner
BB:NF/jfs
Attachment: Letter from Applicant Requesting Continuance dated November 24, 1998
01-06-~00 07: ~M F~OM TO 1~09477'-d~47 ~. 01
MEMO
MAS! PLAZA
Brad Bullet, City Planner ~ November 24, 1998
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Michael Scamdiffio
Masi Commerce Center Partners
City Council Appeal - December 2, 1998
Location of LaFourcade I]~co~e Parapet
This l~r~-r is to request postponement of our City Council appeal referenced above to a latter
date.
As we agreed to at our meeting on Monday. November 23, MCCP will continue to work
with staff to better elucidam our proposal fat the placement of the LaFourcade parapet and
for tim decorative ¢icmmat that/s propo.~/in it, pla~ over the Compass Creek Brewery ,it
Restaurant entnmce.
I further underzrand that pI.nning staff and MCCP may agree to take this item back to the
PlalJairlg Commi-~/on for review with a more detailed graphic presentation and additional
salient informat/on I further ~d that MCCP's appeal to the City Council is still
l~a~ling and that we have nor forfeited our right to the ap_t~al.
Furthermorc, I understand that you will allow us to post a cash deposit of no more than three
tlmusxnd do'liars ($3,000.00) in cxchangc for allowing !mildins #5 (m well as otl~r
buildlng-%/fapplicable) to be released for Tenant occupancy pending the ultimate
determination of this matter. Additionally, I understand that you will give us a reasonable
mount of time to install the La Fourca& parapet (or duplicate if necessary), as well as
another decorative stru~ or axtwork over the trailcling entrance, as may be requir~ of us.
I hope this letter meets with your approval. If you have any questions, please call na~ at
909-481-5020.
Sincerely,
Michael~ Strandiffio
TOTAL P. 01
/-
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
December 2, 1998
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
Brad Buller, City Planner
SELECTION OF TWO COUNCIL MEMBERS
GENERAL PLAN REVISION TASK FORCE.
TO SERVE ON THE
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council select two representatives to the General Plan Revision Task Force.
ANALYSIS
The General Plan Task Force, with staffs assistance, will finalize an Issues Report that will
establish the scope of technical and policy matters that will be evaluated. The final Issues
Report will be developed and recommended by the Task force to the Planning Commission
and the City Council.
Planning Commission Vice Chairman Rich Macias and Commissioner John Mannerino
were selected by the Planning Commission to serve on the Joint Task Force.
After the City Council has selected their representatives, staff will convene a meeting by
mid-December to finalize the work program and schedule.
Respectfully submitted,
Brad Buller
City Planner
BB:Is
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
December 2, 1998
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
Duane A. Baker, Assistant to the City Manager
CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FROM CITIZENS COMMITrED TO
CHILDREN TO SUPPORT A BOND MEASURE IN THE ALTA LOMA
SCHOOL DISTRICT
The City has received a request from Citizens Committed to Children, a citizens group
supporting a bond measure in the Alta Loma School District, to pass a resolution in support of
this measure. Attached for your consideration is a draft resolution submitted by Citizens
Committed to Children.
The proposed bond measure will appear on the ballot in March 1999. The bonds would be
used along with matching funds from the state to fund various capital projects in the schools of
the District as well as build a permanent Banyan Elementary School. Representatives of
Citizens Committed to Children will be at the Council meeting to discuss and present this
request.
Respectfully submitted,
Duane A. Baker
Assistant to the City Manager
/dab
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA IN SUPPORT OF A GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND
FOR THE ALTA LOMA SCHOOL DISTRICT
WHEREAS, the quality education of our children is the key to the future of our
community: and
WHEREAS, as the elementary and junior high schools in the Alta Loma School
District age and as the population of the City increases there is a great need for adding
classrooms to existing schools to reduce class size, replacing deteriorating portables,
upgrading/installing elec~cal wiring, improving plumbing systems, renovating restrooms, and
constmcting permanent classrooms at Banyan Elementary School; and
WHEREAS, a general obligation bond would provide the funds for much needed
improvements to all elementary and junior high schools in the Alta School District; and
WHEREAS, a general obligation bond would also provide the funds for a permanent
Banyan Elementary School in Alta Loma to serve the needs of our community; and
WHEREAS, without the support of the community and without the funds from this
bond issue, matching state funds would not be available.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga does hereby support the general obligation bond measure of the Alta
Loma School District, to fund needed capital improvements in our local elementary schools
and to constmct a permanent Banyan Elementary School to serve our community.
CIT .Y OF RANCHO CUCAMON
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
December 2, 1998
TO:
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM:
Rick Gomez, Community Development Director
BY:
Karen McGuire-Emery, Senior Park Planner
SUBJECT: CENTRAL PARK UPDATE
When Rancho Cucamonga initiated its planning program, the City planned a hierarchy of parks and
open space consisting of neighborhood parks and community size parks, as well as various trails
throughout the community. The majority of the neighborhood park open spacewas acquired through
park dedication requirements through the development process. The community parks were acquired
through acquisition. In 1984, the City Council took advantage of an opportunity to acquire the
approximately 103.4 gross acres of land located at the Northwest comer of Milliken Avenue and
Base Line Road for a special park that would someday serve the whole city and become a major
public resource on the order of other great parks in other major cities.
The City negotiated a purchase agreement with Lewis Homes to acquire the Central Park property
through a land purchase agreement and note. The negotiated price (which was below market at the
time) was $ 5,173,500. The agreement called for ten (10) annual payments with the last to be paid
in 1994. The agreement also called for release of the property by ten (10) equal parcels one at a
time consistent with the annual payments.
Like other disposition agreements where there is a purchase and/or gifting, the purchase agreement
contains language that Lewis Homes has the right of first refusal, over a 20 year period of time, to
teacquire the property should the City wish to dispose of the property and not utilize the land for
park purposes. Central Park has been placed into the City's General Plan and this property has
since been reserved for future park purposes. There has been no city council desirous of changing
this policy.
During the mid to late 1980's, the City had fully concentrated on guiding the development of its
foundation parks--neighborhood and smaller community parks. The economy was healthy and
development in particular was strong, thus, the City's park dedication requirements enabled a
relatively rapid pace of neighborhood park development. In 1985, the City Council created the Park
and Recreation Improvement District (PD-85), to acquire, develop, and operate Red Hill and
Heritage Community Parks. In addition, in 1988, through Certificates of Participation (COP), the
City acquired the Etiwanda Creek Park land. So confident was the City during this time period that
it organized a Central Park Task Force to begin workshops on the development of a Conceptual
Master Plan for Central Park. While no revenue was available for its construction nor was there any
real time line for plan development, it was felt that a vision for the park was necessary to guide its
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
CENTRAL PARK UPDATE
December 2, 1998
Page 2
future development. Rancho Cucamonga has always had a reputation for planning for the future.
Even during those very strong economic times, the time horizon hoped for was 10 to 15 years for
completion of a park of such scale as Central Park.
Given this confidence, in late 1988, the City issued COP's to acquire the entire Central Park Parcel.
Because of the way in which the parcels were designed to be released by the property owner, no
sensible park construction could have occurred without first having acquired the entire parcel. In
1990, work on a further phase of the Master Plan, Design Development, accelerated because a maj or
State grant program gave hope that Rancho Cucamonga might qualify for a major grant that would
start the library component of the Master Plan and propel an initial phase of Central Park. As an
outgrowth of this work, a Library Master Plan was also adopted. The State Grant did not come to
fruition, however, the City gained a Library Master Plan for the future. In hindsight, it was perhaps
fortuitous that the grant program did not come to fruition since the City, at that time, was hoping for
future revenue to provide for the operations of such a facility, revenue, which did not materialize
because of the onset of severe economic and other changes.
The economic, legislative, and legal changes have affected how the City must plan for the future of
Central Park in significant ways. In 1990, the fiscal conditions in the City began to plummet as a
result of dramatic changes in Califomia's economy. Development practically shut down. It would
take another painful five years of financial cutbacks and restructuring to begin recovering, with
recovery having a far different meaning from that of the 80's. During those intervening years,
Rancho Cucamonga, like many other cities, concentrated on survival. There was downsizing,
cutbacks, budgetary restructuring, and new revenue raising just to maintain the City's existing
service levels. The General Fund sank and in order to ensure the preservation of the Central Park
property, a "refinancing" was accomplished in 1990 to defease the COP's through the
Redevelopment Agency. This action was one of many to help gain budgetary balance in the City's
General Fund. Today, Central Park is now owned outright by the City without any further General
Fund encumbrances.
During that difficult time period, not only did the City have to take actions to deal with the effects
of our local economy, it also had to face the State's raids on local revenues, as well as changes in
laws that now affect how cities can fund projects. The local revenue shift, including property tax
and ERAF (Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund) shif~ have not been reversed. This,
combined with the fact that development and park development revenues would not return to the
level of the 1980's, meant that all park development decelerated. Even Etiwanda Creek Park is still
not completed. During these intervening years, design development of Central Park was halted.
Maintenance and operations of parks in Rancho Cucamonga are funded through various assessment
districts. The passage of Proposition 62 and Proposition 218 now place particular requirements for
voter approval for any new tax or assessment revenues, such that no maintenance costs, basic, or
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
CENTRAL PARK UPDATE
December 2, 1998
Page 3
otherwise, can be placed in assessment districts without a vote of property owners. These legal
changes virtually mean that to develop revenues to implement any sizeable project, park or
otherwise, will require a direct vote.
It has also taken about two years for court decisions, legislative refinement, and legal study just to
understand the nuances of these propositions that replaced former approaches that had years of
legislative and judicial history for guidance. There is now a better understanding of what it takes
to develop a successful project under these new ground rules. Any ballot measure, to be successful
today, must have a defined process by which project, scope, cost, and method must be assessed from
the standpoint of voter preferences. In other words, not only has the structure of local budgets
changed, but the ground rules of local finance have dynamically changed wherein any approaches,
previously planned, or otherwise, must be re-examined and any strategic planning for Central Park
implementation must incorporate these new factors into the planning.
Because of greater confidence in the economy and a greater understanding of the complexities of
Prop 218, as well as greater confidence in the future, a renewed effort has been made to develop an
implementation program for Central Park. The Task Force was reconvened on October 6, 1998, and
unveiled was an approach to developing a ballot measure that would incorporate the requisite
elements of community input that would lead to successful public support for a Central Park project.
A Request For Proposal (RFP) process began in October 1998, for expert assistance in obtaining
the scientific and statistically accurate information necessary to develop the strategic plan. Once this
work is completed, an appropriate ballot measure can be prepared.
The formation of the Park and Recreation Improvement District known as PD-85, as per the
Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, was accomplished solely for the construction and
maintenance of Heritage and Red Hill Community Parks--two community size parks. No funds from
PD-85, nor funds from any other assessment district can be used for Central Park because when these
districts were formed, the Central Park area was not identified for inclusion. The philosophy of the
City is that Central Park will benefit the entire community, and currently there is no Assessment
District that includes the entire community. PD-85 was ratified, through a property owner election,
per Prop 218 requirements, in 1997.