HomeMy WebLinkAbout1998/12/16 - Agenda PacketCITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
REGULAR MEETINGS
1st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:00 p.m.
December 16,1998
Civic Center
Council Chambers
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
City Councilmembers
William J. Alexander, Mayor
Diane Williams, Mayor Pro Tern
Paul Biane, Councilmember
James V. Curatalo, Councilmember
Bob Dutton, Councilmember
Jack Lam, City Manager
James L. Markman, City Attorney
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk
City Office: 477-2700
City Council Agenda
December 16, 1998
All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing.
The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, one
week prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such
items.
1. Roll Call:
A. CALL TO ORDER
Alexander , Biane
Curatalo , Dutton
and Williams
B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
Presentation of a Certificate of Recognition commending Jimmy
Schafer and Amanda Bratvoid of Alta Loma High School for being
selected to play in the Pasadena City Rose Bowl Band.
Presentation of a Proclamation commending the Pop Warner
Panthers Midget Division and Braves Junior Midget Division on
their Mount Baldy Conference Championship and the Pop Warner
Eagles on its American Football Conference (A.F.C.) Division
Championship.
C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
This is the time and place for the general public to address the City
Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any
issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may
receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.
Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual.
D. CONSENT CALENDAR
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and
non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time
without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember
or member of the audience for discussion.
Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 11/25/98 and 12/2/98 and
Payroll ending 11/18/98 for the total amount of $2,591,312.36.
Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of
November 30, 1998.
10
City Council Agenda
December 16, 1998
2
o
Approval and execution of a Cooperative Agreement (CO98-069)
between the San Bernardino Associated Governments/San
Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SANBAG) and the
City of Rancho Cucamonga for the funding of the construction of
the Highland Avenue Realignment and the construction of Day
Creek Boulevard (Highland Avenue/Day Creek Boulevard Project).
RESOLUTION NO. 98-217
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE EXECUTION
OF THE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE SAN BERNARDINO
ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS/SAN
BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION
AUTHORITY AND THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA FOR THE PROPOSED DESIGN,
FUNDING AND CONSTRUCTION
ADMINISTRATION RESPONSIBILITIES OF
HIGHLAND AVENUE/DAY CREEK BOULEVARD
PROJECT
Approval to authorize the Advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids"
for the construction of the Highland Avenue Realignment and the
construction of Day Creek Boulevard from Highland Avenue to
Base Line Road to be funded from Account No. 32-4637-9710 and
Account No. 22-4637-9710.
RESOLUTION NO. 98-218
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION
OF HIGHLAND AVENUE REALIGNMENT AND
THE CONSTRUCTION OF DAY CREEK
BOULEVARD FROM HIGHLAND AVENUE TO
BASE LINE ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT IN
SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND
DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE
TO RECEIVE BIDS
Approval to declare Surplus Miscellaneous City-Owned
Equipment.
Approval to appropriate $27,000 from the Data Processing
Replacement Reserve to fund the Library's LAN Network project.
15
19
20
22
27
43
City Council Agenda
December 16, 1998
3
Approval of Parcel Map, Improvement Agreement and
Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape
Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance
District Nos. 1 and 2 for Parcel Map 15170, located on the east
side of Hellman, north of Wilson, submitted by Hillside Cove
Associates, LLC.
RESOLUTION NO. 98-219
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NO.
15170, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY
RESOLUTION NO. 98-220
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
TEHC ITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION
OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1
AND 2 FOR PARCEL MAP 15170
Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security
and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District
No. 2 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 3 for
Tract 15766, located on Base Line Road, approximately 800' west
of Victoria Park Lane, submitted by R. C. Apartments L.L.C., a
Developer.
RESOLUTION NO. 98-221
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENTAND IMPROVEMENTSECURITY
FOR TRACT MAP NUMBER 15766
RESOLUTION NO. 98-222
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION
OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 AND STREET
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1
AND 3 FOR TRACT MAP NUMBER 15766
44
46
47
52
53
City Council Agenda
December 16, 1998
4
10.
11.
12.
13.
Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security
for the Installation of a Master Plan Storm Drain System relating to
Tract 14534-2, located in Victoria Park Lane, east of Rochester
Avenue, submitted by William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California
Corporation.
RESOLUTION NO. 98-223
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENTAND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY
FOR THE INSTALLATION OF A MASTER PLAN
STORM DRAIN SYSTEM RELATING TO TRACT
14534-2
Approval to reject all bids for the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center
Canopy Addition Project because the bids substantially exceed the
Engineer's Estimate.
Approval to award and authorization for execution of Contract
(CO98-070) for the construction of landscaping and irrigation for
the Haven Avenue Beautification Project between Base Line Road
and Church Street, to be funded from Beautification Funds,
Account No. 21-4647-9709.
Approval to accept the Senior Center Parking Lot Expansion
Project, Contract No.98-008, as complete, Release the Bonds, and
authorize the City Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion" and
approve the final contract amount of $157,761.95.
RESOLUTION NO. 98-224
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE SENIOR CENTER
PARKING LOT EXPANSION PROJECT,
CONTRACT NO. 98-008 AND AUTHORIZING
THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION
FOR THE WORK
Approval to accept the traffic signal lighting at the intersection of
Arrow Route and Red Oak Avenue, Contract No. 98-022, as
complete, Release the Bonds, and authorize the City Engineer to
file a "Notice of Completion" and approve the final contract amount
of $119,373.00.
56
58
60
61
63
64
65
City Council Agenda
December 16, 1998
5
14.
15.
16.
RESOLUTION NO. 98-225
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL
LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF ARROW
ROUTE AND RED OAK AVENUE, CONTRACT
NO. 98-022 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF
A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
Approval to accept the Tapia Via Street Improvements, from Grove
Avenue to Rancheria Street, Contract No. 98-012, as complete,
Release the Bonds, and authorize the City Engineer to file a
"Notice of Completion" and approve the final contract amount of
$195,194.41.
RESOLUTION NO. 98-226
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR TAPIA VIA STREET
IMPROVEMENTS, FROM GROVE AVENUE TO
RANCHERIA STREET, CONTRACT NO. 98-012
AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE
OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
Approval to accept the Spruce Park Skate Park, Contract No. 98-
032, as complete, Release the Bonds, and authorize the City
Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion" and approve the final
contract amount of $120,079.80
RESOLUTION NO. 98-227
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE SPRUCE AVENUE
SKATE PARK, CONTRACT NO. 98-032, AND
AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
Approve of the improvements, Release the Faithful Performance
Bond, and file a "Notice of Completion" for improvements for PM
15074, located on the north side of La Vine Street 230 feet east of
Hellman Avenue, submitted by Mr. Denning M. Perdew, Executor
for the estate of John L. Perdew.
66
67
68
69
71
72
City Council Agenda
December 16, 1998
RESOLUTION NO. 98-228
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 15074,
AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE
OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
73
E. CONSENT ORDINANCES
The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first
reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non-
controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time
without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be
removed for discussion.
CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND
VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 98-03 - RANCHO
CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - A request to
change the Victoria Community Plan Land Use Map from Medium
Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and Community Facility
to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for 17
acres of land on the north side of Base Line Road, approximately
1,300 feet east of the intersection of Rochester Avenue - APN:
0227-091-18 through 21. Staff has prepared a Negative
Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration.
ORDINANCE NO. 592 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA
COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 98-03, A
REQUEST TO CHANGE THE VICTORIA
COMMUNITY PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM
MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING
UN ITS PER ACRE) AND COMMUNITY FACILITY
TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8
DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 17 ACRES
OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF
BASE LINE ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 1,300
FEET EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF
ROCHESTER AVENUE, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 0227-
091-18 THROUGH 21
74
City Council Agenda
December 16, 1998
CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND
VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 98-04 - CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to change the Victoria
Community Plan Land Use Map from Medium Residential (8-14
dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling
units per acre) for approximately 6 acres of land on the north side
of Base Line Road, approximately 1,100 feet east of the
intersection of Rochester Avenue and for 2 ½ acres of land
approximately 2,000 feet east of the intersection of Rochester
Avenue - APN: 0227-091-22, 25, and 43. Staff has prepared a
Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration.
ORDINANCE NO. 593 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA
COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 98-04, A
REQUEST TO CHANGE THE VICTORIA
COMMUNITY PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM
MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING
UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW-MEDIUM
RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER
ACRE) FOR 6 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON
THE NORTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD,
APPROXIMATELY 1,100 FEET EAST OF THE
INTERSECTION OF ROCHESTER AVENUE
AND FOR 2 Y2 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON
THE NORTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD,
APPROXIMATELY 2,000 FEET EAST OF THE
INTERSECTION OF ROCHESTER AVENUE,
AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF - APN: 0227-091-22, 25, AND 43
78
F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public
hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to
receive public testimony.
CONSIDERATION OF CODE AMENDMENTS REGARDING
GRADING REVIEW AND TIME EXTENSIONS - CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
82
City Council Agenda
December 16, 1998
ORDINANCE NO. 594 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 15, CHAPTER
15.12 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING REVIEW OF
GRADING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
ORDINANCE NO. 595 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 16 OF THE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE
REGARDING THE EXTENSION OF
SUBDIVISION MAPS
ORDINANCE NO. 596 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT
CODE AMENDMENT 98-01, AMENDING
SECTION 17.02.100 OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA DEVELOPMENT CODE,
REGARDING LAPSE OF APPROVALS AND
EXTENSIONS
87
89
93
G. PUBLIC HEARINGS
The following
requirements.
testimony.
items have no legal publication or posting
The Chair will open the meeting to receive public
No Items Submitted.
H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
The following items do not legally require any public testimony,
although the Chair may open the meeting for public input.
No Items Submitted.
City Council Agenda
December 16, 1998
9
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
The following items have been requested by the City Council for
discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair
may open the meeting for public input.
DISCUSSION OF CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEES,
SUBCOMMITTEES AND COMMISSIONS
2. RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SIGNAGE TASK FORCE
3. PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES UPDATE
A. PARKS & FACILITIES UPDATE
1. Rancho Cucamonga Family Sports Center
2. Rancho Cucamonga Public Library
3. Stadium
4. Spruce Avenue Park Skate Facility
5. Heritage Park
6. Etiwanda Creek Park
7. Central Park
B. COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE
1. Seniors
2. Teens
3. Youth Activities
4. Youth Sports
5. Rancho Cucamonga Family Sports Center
6. Adult Sports
7. Facilities
8. The Grapevine
9. Contract Classes
10. Community-wide Special Events
11. Proposed Boxing Program
12. Senior Transportation Program
13. Trips and Tours
14. Human Services
15, Park and Recreation Commission
16. Epicenter
95
104
132
J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to
discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this
meeting, only identified for the next meeting.
City Council Agenda
December 16, 1998
10
K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
This is the time and place for the general public to address the City
Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any
issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may
receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.
Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual.
L. ADJOURNMENT
MEETING TO ADJOURN TO EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS:
PROPERTY CLAIM SETTLEMENT PER GOVERNMENT CODE
SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT BERYL,
BETWEEN 19TM STREET AND HIGHLAND; LARRY TEMPLE,
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR, NEGOTIATING
PARTY, REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS OF PAYMENT.
PROPERTY NEGOTIATIONS PER GOVERNMENT CODE
SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON ETIWANDA
AVENUE AND VICTORIA AVENUE, NEGOTIATING PARTY
BRAD BULLER, REGARDING TERMS OF AGREEMENT.
I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my
designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda
was posted on December 10, 1998, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the
meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
LIST OF WARRANTS
FOR PERIODi 12-02-98 (98/99)
RUN DATE: 12/02/98 PAGE: 1
VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMT.
5121 DE VOOGHT, SCOTT J. 360.00
6050 JOSEPH FILIPPI WINERY 150.00
4635 A & K PHOTOGRAPHY ~1.36
** CHECK# OVERLAP
3448 ALL WELDING MAINTENANCE REPAIRS # 133701- 1,185.00-
{~4 133702 - 134000
47~3 AMERICAN CABLE ENTERTAINMENT ADVERTISING 134001~ 765.00-
<44 134002 - 134102
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES # 134103*
RECREATION REFUND 134104*
4<4 134105 - 134106
PHOTO DEVELOPING & SUPPLIES # 134107
4{{ 134108 - 134108
10 A & R TIRE SERVICE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE # 134109
1 A A EGUIPMENT RENTALS CO.,INC. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES 134110 81.60
391~ A.& M. EOUIPMENT AND SERVICES REBUILD KIT 134111 133.23
2732 ABC LOCKSMITHS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 134112 38.79
7 ABLETRONICS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 134113 ~4.21
3785 ACTION ART RECREATION SUPPLIES 134114 982.68
57~2 ADAM, ROBERT INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 134115
5231 AEF SYSTEMS CONSULTING, INC. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES # 134116 1,800.00
5509 AIR CONTROLLED ENVIRONMENTS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 134117 13~.~7
6024 AIRGAS RECREATION REFUND 134118 192.79
4207 ALERT COMMUNICATIONS CO. INSTALLATION/SERVICE # 134119 170.00
3448 ALL WELDING MAINTEN~NCE REPAIRS 134120 355.00
3778 ALPERT, MELANIE INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 134121 1,365.00
5650 ALTA LOMA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 134122 1o~00.00
5~50 ALTA LOMA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 134123 300.00
4763 AMERICAN CABLE ENTERTAINMENT ADVERTISING 1341~4 765.00
20971 ANDREWS, THERE8E RECREATION REFUND # 1341~5 43.00
5321 APOLLO WOOD RECOVERY, INC. SUPPLIES & SERVICE # 13412~ 132.22
667 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION VISA MONTHLY BILLINGS 134127 41.68
402 AUTO RESTORATORS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 134128 128.33
4102 B & K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 134129
33 BASELINE TRUE VALUE HARDWARE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 134130 36.43
5~9 BBR SURVEYING INSTRUMENTS COoINC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 134131 15~.77
5791 BELETTO, NANCY INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 134132 260.00
~5~ BENEFIELD, KINGSLEY INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 134133 43.20
5119 BENSON, MAURY INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 134134
46~9 BORDNER, MARGIE INSTRUCTOR PMT 134135 943.~0
20974 BROADWAY MY WAY ENTERTAINMENT 12/05/98 134136 300.00
4369 BRODART BOOKS LIBRARY SUPPLIES # 134137 1,&80.34
1166 BRUNSWICK DEER CREEK LANES INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 134138
6007 BUDCO RECREATION REFUND # 134139
5591 BURCHFIELD, DARRELL INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 134140 175.50
552 BURK-BLACKSCHLEGER, ROSEANN INSTRUCTOR PMT 134141 3,668.20
5746 BUSINESS SPECIALTIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 134142 3,198.20
20972 C & G CONSTRUCTION, INC. DEPOSIT REFUND 134143 1o000.00
68 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SERVICE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 134144 ~64. 10
69 CHAFFEY dOINT UNION H.S. DISTRICT RENTAL - AUDITORIUM R.C.H.S. 134145 405.00
73 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO, INC. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES # 134146 870.60
74 CITY RENTALS EGUIPMENT RENTAL/SUPPLIES # 134147 279.21
949 CLARK, KAREN INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 134148 252.00
5407 COMBINED MARTIAL SCIENCE INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 134149 324.00
20970 COMMUNITY BAPTIST CHURCH SETTLEMENT CLAIM 134150 34~.95
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONgA
LIST OF WARRANTS
FOR PERIOD: 12-02-98 (98/99)
RUN DATE: I2/02/98 PAGE:
VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMT.
CHECK# OVERLAP
&43 COMPUTERLAND COMPUTER MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES #
5373 COST CONTROL ASSOCIATES MAINTENANCE #
5~51 COVOC CORPORATION MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
20~73 CREATIVE BUILDING CONCEPTS DEPOSIT REFUND
534~ CREATIVE MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES #
134156 -
85 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST
23~ D & K CONCRETE CO
2512 D.A.R.E. AMERICA
4488 DA~HDEVIRIAN, KATHY
284 DAISY WHEEL RIBBON CO, INC
2478 DAPPER TIRE
1290 DEER CREEK CAR WASH
5138 DIAMOND FENCE CO.
5875 DINGEY THE CLOWN AND FRIENDS
5788 DUFFY, RICK/USKO
36506 DUNCAN, LAURA
57~7 ELITE PERSONNEL SERVICES° INC.
5137 EMPIRE MOBILE HOME SERVICE
22~ EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS
5~17 FASTENAL COMPANY
364~2 FELIPE'S TAGUERIA
124 FENCE CRAFT OF UPLAND, INC~
155 FILARSKY & WATT
724 FLORIO, ~OAN
2840 FORD OF UPLAND, INC.
1082 FRANKLIN GUEST CO.
5502 GIORDANO, MARIANNA
4632 GLOBAL TELE-DATA CORPORATION
5312 GOODHEART, PAULA
~50 GRAINGER~ W.W
3827 GREEN ROC~ POWER EGUIPMENT
137 GTE CALIFORNIA
4486 GUARDIAN
5~09 HASTY AWARDS
820 HEARD P.H.D. , EDWARD
3334 HEILIG, KELLY
5460 HIDALGO, CARLO
~58 HIGGINS, MARTI
4~28 HOCKEY WEST
158 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO., INC.
4033 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICE
3~33 HOMELESS OUTREACH PRgMS & EDUCATION
1~I HOYT LUMBER CO., S.M.
241~ HOYT, RAYMOND
4188 I.D. BURR
42~4 IBM CORPORATION
5804 INACOM COMMUNICATIONS
46 INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT
MONTHLY WATER BILLINGS
STREET MAINTENANCE
D.A.R.E. MATERIAL
INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT
OFFICE SUPPLIES
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES #
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES/SERVICE
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT
RECREATION REFUND
PERSONNEL SERVICES #
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES #
IRRIGATION SUPPLIES #
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
REFRESHMENTS FOR MEETING
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES #
MONTHLY SERVICES
INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE #
OFFICE SUPPLIES
INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT
PARTS & INSTALLATION
INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES #
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES #
4<< 134184 -
MONTHLY TELEPHONE BILLINGS #
MEDICAL PREMIUM
RECREATION SUPPLIES #
INSTRUCTOR PMT
INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT
INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT
CERT SUPPLIES
RECREATION
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
MONTHLY SERVICES
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
#
1341c~4 -
#
134151 12,440.87
134152 268.32
134153 295.00
134154 500.00
134155 1,615.0o
134157
134158 19,846.25
13415~
134160 2,112.22
134161 347. lO
134162 16.35
134163 30400.07
134164 70.00
134165 8&O. 00
134166 270.00
134167 5~0.00
134168 55.00
134169 42~.57
134170 ~,099.00
134171 165.75
134172 57.09
134173
134174 1,192.4~
134175 405.00
134176 132.00
134177 1,893.80
134178
13417~
134180 50.00
134181 744.00
134182 993.24
134183 271.10
134184
134185 1,808.67
134186 627.~0
134187 681.30
134188
134189 1,011.60
134190 3~.50
134191 42.08
134192 70.03
134193 2,100.67
1341~4
134195 2,540,04
134196 588.00
134197 317.87
134198 1,824.70
134199
134200 1,509.&4
134201
134202 538.7~
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
LIST OF WARRANTS
FOR PERIOD~ 12-02-98 (98/99)
RUN DATE: 12/02/98 PAGE:
VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMT.
~ CHECK# OVERLAP
3736 INLAND EMPIRE SOCCER REFEREE ASSN. MEN'S SOCCER PROGRAM 134203 453.00
1952 INLAND EMPIRE STAGES, LTD. TRANSPORTATION SERVICES # 134204
5682 INLAND INDUSTRIAL MEDICAL GROUP PROFESSIONAL SERVICES # 134205 684.90
3885 INLAND LAWNMOWER VEHICLE MAINTENANCE # 134206 36.16
4718 INLAND TOP SOIL MIXES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 134207 86.20
2315 INLAND WHOLESALE NURSERY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 134208 108.62
5616 ISA MEMBERSHIP # 134209 230.00
612 JAESCHKE INC., C.R. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 134210 546.01
5214 JOHNSON, SANDRA INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 134211 18.00
4700 JONES, KEITH INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 134212 316.80
6050 JOSEPH FILIPPI WINERY RECREATION REFUND 134213 150.00
179 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN MEDICAL INSURANCE 134214 27,171.48
1218 KNOX MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 134215 593.44
4982 KORANDA CONSTRUCTION C.D.B.G. 134216 234.50
172 KOZLOVICHo DEBBIE INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 134217 2,637.00
518 KUHN, MARY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 134218 40.00
193 LAIRD CONSTRUCTION CO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 134219 11,222.55
339 LAM, JACK LEAGUE MEETING 134220 18.90
521~ LAS ROSAS - EMMA SORCINI INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 134221 &3.00
5134 LEWIS & LEWIS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 134222 288.81
979 LEWIS HOMES REFUND OF DEVELOPMENT FEES 134223 8.50
588~ LIGHTNING FENCE CO. COMMUNITY TRAILS 134224 41,418.45
200 LOS ANGELES TIMES SUBSCRIPTION 134225 16.56
349 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT. INC. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE # 134227 63,623.88
72 MARK CHRIS, INC. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 134228 248.11
4701 MARSHALL, SYLVIA RECREATION REFUND 134229 619.50
250 MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE TOWING SERVICE8 134230 45.00
3907 MASTER-SORT, INC. PRESORT MAIL SERVICES 134231 98.13
3871 MATT'S HARDWARE BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND # 134232
5283 MAYER, COBLE & PALMER PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 134233 1,187.50
31060 MCG ARCHITECTS REFUND 134234 25.00
2198 MICHAELS STORES INC. #3019 RECREATION SUPPLIES 134235 17.70
4374 MOBILE STORAGE GROUP, INC. EQUIPMENT RENTAL 134236 140. 12
5987 MOUNTAIN FRESH DRINKING WATER SYS. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 134~37 37.00
31061 NASCIMENTO, IAN MISC 134238
31064 NATIONAL INFORMATION DATA CENTER SUBSCRIPTION 134239 36.90
31062 NELSON, ARCHIE RECREATION 134240 10.00
5568 NET 10 TECNOLOGIES 2 ON-SITE CLASSES 134241 3,000.00
3600 NIELSEN, NETTIE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 134242
5473 NIGHTLINE SECURITY PATROL SECURITY SERVICE 134243 740.00
433 NIXON-EGLI EQUIPMENT VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 134244 346.2~
6025 NTIS RECREATION REFUND 134245 47.~0
5~7 OLYMPIC STUDIOS INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 134246 2,407.50
5393 OMLOR, AMY COMMUNITY SERVICES ENTERTAINMT 134247 54.00
3429 ON CALL COMPUTER SUPPLY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 134248 458.91
5702 ON WITH LEARNING, INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 134249 374.63
3964 ONTARIO ICE SKATING CENTER INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 134250 748.80
134251
134252
134253
~{4 134251 -
5461 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES #
~461 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES #
1,894.28
42.47
!
I
!
I
!
!
I
!
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
LIST OF WARRANTS
FOR PERIOD: 12-02-9S
RUN DATE: 12/02/9S PAGE: 4
VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMT.
CHECK# OVERLAP
310~3 OTANEZ, CAROLA RECREATION 134254 38.00
235 OWEN ELECTRIC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 134~5~ 6,477.68
31059 P.C. ELECTRIC, INC. REFUND OF OVERPAYMENT 134256 549.34
1441 PACIFIC BELL MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 134257 57.01
4223 PAPER DIRECT, INC. RECREATION SUPPLIES # 134258 236.65
818 PARAGON BUILDING PRODUCTS INC. CONCRETE SUPPLIES 134259 134.80
44~ PARK SPECIALITIES MAINTENANCE SERVICE & SUPPLIES # 134260 111,0S0.8~
540~ PARTSMASTER, INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 1342~1
757 PEP BOYS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 1342~2 94.52
3~3 PERFORMANCE AUTO BODY VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 134~63
5720 PERVO PAINT CO. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 134264 45~.77
~87 PHOENIX GROUP INFORMATION SYSTEMS MONTHLY SERVICE 134265
55~7 PHOTOMAX SUPPLY CO. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 134266 1,055.~8
4554 PITASSI, PETER J. ARCHITECTURAL PROJECT 134267 10,140.54
7~1 PMI/DELTA CARE MEDICAL INSURANCE 134268
104~ POMONA VALLEY KAWASA½I VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 13426~ 441.72
2719 PONCHAUD, JANICE INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 134270 65.40
5177 PORT SUPPLY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 134271 ~58.70
30~71 POTTER, MELISSA MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 134272 37.17
6~3 POWERSTRIDE BATTERY CO. , INC. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 134273 165.~2
758 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION, INC. MAINT/RECREATION SUPPLIES 134274 99.83
5316 PRECISION GYMNASTICS INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 134275 223.80
~026 PRICE RIGHT EMB. BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND # 134276 168.87
65 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 2,87~.61
4668 PULLTARPS MANUFACTURING 257.91
58~9 GUALTIY ONE ENGRAVERS ~4.82
(~ 134277 - 134277
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 134278
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 13427~
OFFICE SUPPLIES # 134280
~ 134~81 - 134281
VEHICLE MAINT, SUPPLIES&SERVICE # 134282
SOIL TESTING SERVICES # 134283
TGIF MINI PLAN # 134284
RECREATION SUPPLIES 134285
MEMBERSHIP MEETINO # 134286
PERMIT DEPOSIT REFUND 134287
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 134288
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES # 134289
PRINTS # 134290
PROGRESS ESTIMATE # 134291
ELECTRICICAL SUPPLIES 134292
INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 134293
SERVICE AND SUPPLIES 1342~4
RECREATION SUPPLIES 134295
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 1342~6
PRINTING & MAIL SERVICES 134297
UNDERGROUND TANKS 134298
MAINT SUPPLIES # 1342~9
RECREATION REFUNDS 134300
INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 134301
STAFF MTG LUNCH 134302
OFFICE SUPPLIES 134303
MAINT SUPPLIES 134304
~51 R & R AUTOMOTIVE 1,8~4.87
418 R M A GROUP 5,445.00
4451 R.C. GUAKES PROFESSIONAL BASEBALL 4o000.00
~64 RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY 7.74
70 RANCHO CUCAMON~A CHAMBER 1&~.00
1050~ RANCHO PACIFIC DEV CORP 500.00
4130 RBM LOCK & KEY SERVICE ~.3~
5~14 REXEL CALCON ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 39.18
276 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 428.9~
4257 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 6,153.20
2082 ROYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 23.6~
4704 RUSH, CHRIS 254.10
3745 SAFELITE GLASS CORP. 28D. 45
5~67 SALITO, SHARON 60.00
5538 SAN ANTONIO MATERIALS 148.13
261 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 35.10
5029 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FIRE DEPT. 15.39
132 SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM CO, INC 437.47
111~8 SANCHEZ, RICHARD 5.00
5317 SANTANA, LIVIER 304.20
11170 SAVORY 225.00
1105 SEAL FURNITURE & SYSTEMS INC. 435.00
351 SIGN SHOP, THE 242.44
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
LIST OF WARRANTS
FOR PERIOD: 12-02-98 (98/99)
RUN DATE: 12/02/98 PAGE:
VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMT.
*~ CHEC½# OVERLAP
~0~6 SLOUCH~FRIENDS, INC., THE RECREATION, ENTERTAINMENT 134305 100.00
135 SO CALIF MUNICIPAL ATHLETIC FED, INC REGISTRATION 134306
5~03 SOLIS, EDWARD CONTRACT SERVICES 134307
~4 134308 - 134310
1432 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLS # 134311 37,316.71
5281 STERICYCLE, INC. SHARPS PROGRAM # 134312 174.22
11138 SUBWAY MEETING SUPPLIES 134313 43.20
5658 SUMMIT SAFETY PRODUCTS SUPPLIES 134314 113.14
5410 T & D INSTALLATIONS SUPPLIES 134315 347.56
2344 TARGET YOUTH PROGRAM & DAY CAMP SUPPL 134316 28.&5
836 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS MAINT SUPPLIES # 134317 10,172.08
456~ TEE'S PLUS POLICE DEPT SUPPLIES 134318 11o974.15
3942 TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL P MONTHLY PEST CONTROL SERVICE # 134319 847.00
2718 TERRY, DONNA INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 134320 231.00
1~19 TOMAR½ SPORTS INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 134321 648.64
5~7 TRIMBLE NAVIGATION COMPUTER PROGRAM & SUPPLIES # 134322 12,434.36
1116~ TRUONG, G.C. RECREATION REFUNDS 134323
5455 TYPECARE TYPEWRITER REPAIRS 134324 47.40
4558 U.S. GUARDS CO., INC. SECURITY GUARD SERVICE # 134325 2,052.31
1226 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE UPS SERVICE # 134326 82.00
535~ VILLICANAo DEBORAH INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 134327 48.60
4~ VISION SERVICE PLAN - (CA) MONTHLY VISION SERVICE BILLIN~ 134328
4714 VPD LIBRARY SUPPLIES 13432~ ~4.37
~4 134330 - 134330
213 WAXIE, KLEEN-LINE CORP MAINT SUPPLIES # 134331 6,309.72
50~ XEROX CORPORATION COPY MACHINE SUPPLIES/SERVICE 134332 &~.57
2021 YORA INDUSTRIES GRAFFITI REMOVER # 134333 2,058.03
TOTAL 520,520.17
'k
CITY 3F R~NCHO CUCAMONGA
LiST OF WARRANTS
N~R PERIOD: 11-25-98
VENDOR
5155
20942
4635
$832
5957
1826
440?
bo7
3637
~0967
6153
4441
4407
20968
481
2096~
5746
1061
2470
130
4O18
5401
4545
5~1
4205
9??
3364
6041
229
3088
4895
744
4540
39~Z
38~7
5387
137
137
RUN DATE: i1/24/93 P~GE: 1
NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMY.
~ CHECKa OVERLAP
U.S. BANK TRUST LEASE PAYMENT 132496~ 4,050.00-
(4( 132497 - 133320
CRIUARO, DOLLRES RECREATION REFUND 133321~ 24.00-
<<< 133322 - 133678 >>>
COSTCO RECREATION SUPPLIES 133679~ 565.60
<<< 133680 - 133924 >>>
A ~ K PHOTOGRAPHy PHOTO OEVELOPING ~ SUPPLIES 133925 43o78
ACEKA PROTECTION SERVICES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES ~ 133926 3,459.8~
ADVANCED SYSTEMS APPL. & PRODUCTS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ~ 13392? 17,015o22
<(< 133928 - 133928
AIRTOUCH CELLULAR CELLULAR PHONE BILLINGS ~ 1333~9 2,413.30
ALERT COMMUNICATIONS C~. INSTaLLATION/SERVICE 133930 212.~0
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION APA MEMBERSHIP DUES 133931 33~.00
<<< 133932 - 133932
ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION ViS~ MONTHLY BILLINGS ~ 13~933 £,6U0.45
ASPA M~MB£RSHIP DUES 133934 50°00
B & K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 133935 16.66
BANDHOLTZ, BOB RZCREATION REFUND 133936
BARCLAYS LAW PUBLISHERS CC~ TITLE 19 COMPLETE AMENDS 133937 I15.00
BEST 6U¥ CJ., INC. ]~FIC~ SUPPLIES e 133938 1,019.92
BETTER ENERG~ IDEAS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ~ 133939 1,70!.21
B[LASH, ANN RECREATION REFUND 133940 30.00
BLUE $HIELD/CAR~ AMERICA MEDICAL PREMIUM 133941
BETT~N~ THERESA RcCRE~TION REFUNO 1339&2 ~0.00
BR~DART BOG~S LibRARY SUPPLIES ~ 133943 3,152.79
BUSINESS SPECIALTIES M~INT[NANCE SUPPLIES m 133944 3,2BT.55
CHAMPION AWARDS ~ SPECIALITIES kNGRAVED PLAQUE ~ 133945
COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY VEHICLE M~INTENANCE SUPPLIES ~ 133946 373.b9
COMPUTER S~RVICE CO SIGNAL MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES ~ 133947 0,22~.46
CkEATIVE LIGHTING MAINT~NANC£ SUPPLIES 133~48 1,~00.00
<<< 133949 - 1339~1
CUCAMDNGA C2 WATER DIST MONTHLY WATER BILLINGS m 133952 16,~32.44
CUSTOM MICROFILM SYSTEMS~ INC. OFFIC~ SUPPLIES ~ 133953 2,468.51
DATAZ, INC. OxFICE SUPPLIES 133954 793.77
DEPT. 3F TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTRCL PRCFESSIONAL SERVICES 133955 04.00
DYNAMIC GRAPHICS, INC. OFFICE EQUIPMENT 133956 53.10
E S R I, INC. SOFTWARE SUPPORT FEES 133957
EIGHTH AVENUE GRAPHICS OFFICE SUPPLIES ~ 133958 400.30
EMERY, KAREN REIMEURSEMENT 133959 12.50
EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS IRRIGATION SUPPLIES 133960 186.53
FIRST STOP MOTORSPORTS, INC. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 133961 250.00
FIRST TRUST CALIFORNIA PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 133962 10~743o75
FUNDSEL~CT DEFERRED COMP 133963 2,132.00
GALE RESEARCH~ INC. LIBRARY ~30KS 133964 112o65
G[BBY'S FENCING MATERIALS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 133965 1,761o55
GOMEZ, RICK REIMBURSEMENT 133966 19.60
GREEN ROCK POW~R E~UIPM~NT MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 133967 861.98
GOT TELECOM CALIFORNIA INTERNET SERVICES 133968 1,060.00
((( 133969- 133969
GTE CALIFORNIA MONTHLY TELEPHONE BILLINGS ~ 133970 2,661.79
GTE CALIFORNIA MONTHLY TELEPHONE BILLINGS 133971 61,892.60
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
LIST OF WARRANTS
FOR PERIOD: 11-25-98 (98/99)
RUN DATE: 11/24/~ PAGE:
VENDOR NAME ITEM ION WARR NO WARR. AMT.
*~ CHECK~ OVERLAP
6029 GTR TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 13397Z
4525 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 133973
5699 HARALAM805 BEVERAGE COMPANY RECREATION SUPPLIES I33974
31049 HASBROUCKt ALISA RECREATION 133975
1Z34 HO~EMAN MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I33976
495 HYORD-SCAPE PRODUCTSt INC LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES e 133977
103 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUST-AS7 DEFERRED COMP I33978
588Z ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 401 01 # 133979
46 INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES e 133980
3736 INLAND EMPIRE SOCCER REFEREE ASSN. MEN'S SOCCER PROGRAM 13398!
5193 INTERACTIVE DATA CORPORATION MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 133982
855 INTERSECTION DEVELOPMENT CORP. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES e 133983
1941 JACOBSEN DIVISION OF TEXTRONt INC. MAINT SUPPLIES . 133984
5~29 KiNGSLeY DEPOSITORY CO. RECREATION SUPPLIES ~ 133985
5059 KINKO'S COPIES RECREATION SUPPLIES 133996
1218 KNOX MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES e 133987
4982 KORANDA CONSTRUCTION C.O.B.G. 133988
17Z RDZLOVICH~ DEBBIE INSTRUCTOR PAYNENT 133989
4764 KULI IMAGE INC. RECREATION SUPPLIES e 133990'
4217 LADNER COATINGS EMERGENCY INSTALLATION 133991
31050 LAVERTUt JUOITH RECREATION 133992
849 LAWSON PRODUCTSt INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 133993
1455 LONG°S ORUGS FILM PROCESSING 133994
566Z LOS ANGELES COCA COLA BTL. CO. RECREATION SUPPLIES 133995
((( 133996 - 133996
3~56 LU°S LIGHTMCUSE~ INC. OIL &NALYSZS ! 133997
2448 LUBRICATION ENGINEERSt INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 133998
31051 MAN~ALAt ANNETTE RECREATION 133999
7Z MARK CHRISt INC. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 134000
½T63 MARKS CAbLEVISION ADVERTISING 134001
2198 MICHAELS STORES INC. g3019 RECREATION SUPPLIES 134002
5301 NZW WEST SIGNAL MAINTENANCE 134003
Z361 NEWPORT TRAFFIC STUDIES MAINTENANCE ~ 13400&
3600 NIELSEN. NETTIE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 134005
½3~ NIXON-EGLI EQUIPMENT VEHICLE MAINTENANCE ~ 134006
6025 NTIS RECREATION REFUND 13400T
31052 NUNEZ, MIKE R~CREATION 134008
.0~8 OLO HICKORY CONSTR~TION CHA~FEY GARCIA BaRN CONST. ~ 134009
31055 OLEN, PHYLLIS RECREATION 134010
3049 ONTARIO FIRE EXTINGUISHER CO. ~IRE EXTINGUISHER SERVICES 134011
Z24 ORANGE COd~TY STRIPING SVC~ INC. ~USINESS LICENSE 134012
4904 OTTt LAURA INSTRUCTOR SNR. EXERCISE CLASS ~ 134013
Z35 OWEN ELECTRIC M~INTENANCE SUPPLIES ~ 134014
338 PACIFIC E~UIPT & IRRIGATION. INC. M~INTE~ANCE SUPPLIES ~ 134015
31057 PACIFIC POCLS 6U$INE$S LICENSE 134016
5.09 PARTSMASTERt INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 134017
.57 PATTON SALES CORP. M~INTENANCE SUPPLIES 13A018
~1~56 P£ARCEt ANdREa REC~ATION 134019
31054 PEREZt MARC~ RECREATION 134020
z55 POMA OISTRI6uTING CO VEHICLE M~INTENANCE ~ SUPPLIES ~ 134021
758 PRAXAIR DISTRISUTIONt INC. MAINT/RECREATION SUPPLIES 1340~Z
345.00
gl.00
431.55
38.00
76.6;>
1t161.82
7ZO.00
6t944o71
597.01
453.00
1,179.96
740.28
3tZ77.61
316.T9
275.24
587.50
61.20
593.57
5,000.00
52.00
1,022o26
7.53
197.77
8Z.54
35.00
434.91
765.00
5~.52
1,809.75
225.00
30.00
216.57
37.50
45.00
48,084.47
24.00
93.00
3,328.53
231.00
3 ~638..~5
59.90
11.66
12.0T
74.00
£0.00
12,331.82
96.30
J
,j
VENDOR
31053
4025
27 05
264
5w~
545
5665
11101
276
16
5072
.301
301
301
3249
336~
3896
11162
692
1327
319
5903
~432
2~7
902
~008
5658
~733
.- 5869
11,%1
1261
39~Z
1919
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
LIST OF WARRANTS
FOR PERIOD: 11-25-98 C98/99)
RUN DATE: 11/24/'98 PAGe: 3
= === === = = = = = = =
NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WAR~. AMY.
= = ~= ~= =====: === =========================================
*'::-'~ CH2CK# (]VE~LAP
PUTTNKDWSKI, CINDY RECREATION ~ 134023
R g R AUTOMOTIVE V~HICLE M21NT,SUPPLIES&SERVICE 134024
R d SUPPLY CO* M~INTEN~NCE SUPPLIES 134025
R.H.F., INC. V~HICL~ M&~NT SERVICECSUPPLIES 134026
RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY RECREATION SUPPLIES 134027
~EO WING $HJc STORE S~F~TY 600TS ~ 13402~
RED WING SHOE STORE S~FETY ~00TS 134029
REGULaTICN COMPLIANCE, iNC. T?&iNiNG SERVICES 134030
R£PPEY, KRIS R£CREATION REFUNDS 134031
RIVERSIDE bLUEPRINT P~INTS ~ 134032
ROBLES, R~bL Po, SR. T~RE ~EP~IR 134033
ROSS ~IST~IBUTING CSRPU2~TION, RDN M~INTENANCE SUPPLIES 134034
ROTARY CORPORATION MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES ~ 134035
RT LAWRENCE CORPORATION COMPUTER CONSULTANTS " 134036
SAN BERN C6 AGRICULTURE DEPT. W~EO ABATEMENT SERVICES 134037
SAN BERN CO SHERIFFS CONTRACT SHERIFFS SERVICE # 134038
SAN BERN CO SHERIFFS CSNTRACT SHERIFFS SERVICE 134039
SAN BERN CO SHERIFFS C2~TR~CT SHERIFFS SERVICE 134040
SAN BERN CO SHERIFES C~NT2ACT SHS2IFFS SERVICE e 134041
SAN ~ERN CO ~klS wAST. MGMENT ~q~NT~LY S~kVIC~ 134042
SAN ~E~NARCZN3 COUNTY C~L-~ PT?GRAM 134043
SAN B~NARCIN2 COUNTY ~SCUNZNTARY HANDLING FEE 134044
SAN BERN&R£IN3 COUNTY FILING ~E 134045
SCHWAAB, INC. SU~FLIES m 134046
SEAL FURNITURE C SYST£MS INC. OPFICE SUPPLIES 1340~?
SEFAC LiFT & E~UIPM~NT CORPORATION SERVICE &NO SUPPLIES ~ 134048
SENECHAL, CAt INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT # 13~049
SHARE~ TECH. FAIRCHIL~ TELECOM, INC TELEPHONE SERVICES ~ 134050
S~cLTON, KIMBERLY RECREATION REFUNDS 134051
SIEBE ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS SERVICE/SUPPLIES 134052
SIGN SHOP, THE MAINT SUPPLIES 134053
SIR SPEEDY FAXES 134054
SMART ~ FINAL DAY CAMP SUPPLIES 134055
<<< 134056 - 134056
SO CALIF E~ISDN CO. MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLINGS ~ 13405T
SO CALIF GAS CO. MONTHLY GAS BILLS 1~4058
SOLIS, EDWARD CONTRACT SERVICES 134059
<(( 134060 - 134066
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLS ~ 134067
SPEEDWAY MUFFLER INC. VEHICL£ M~INT SUPPLIES/SERVICE 134068
STANDARO PACIFIC REIMB TEMP UTILITIES 134069
STATE ENVIRONMENTAL MGMT,, INC. SERVICE ANO SUPPLIES # 13~070
STATE 2F CAeDEPARTMENT OF TRANS TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE 134071
STATE OF CALIF. LIBRARY FOUNDATION RECREATION REFUND 13~071
SUMMIT SAFETY PROOUCTS SUPPLIES 13~073
SUNRISE FORD AUTO SERVICE & SUPPLIES # 13407~
SYMBOL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. SOFTWARE AND MAINTENANCE e 134075
TECHNIC OFFICE SUPPLIES 134076
TELEqUESTIDNS EVALUATION TELECOMM EQUIPMENT 134077
TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL P MONTHLY PEST CONTROL SERVICE # 134078
TSMARK SPORTS INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES ~ 134079
130.00
~l. OT
30~.40
104.3t
~T?.7~
279.1~
b,405.15
~o.00
47.50
134.05
195.1o
502.3o
31.25
d3o,2S..4£
4,19~.60
51,57~.1~
45,4~.00
33,221.7o
35.00
7.00
89.17
109.0~
2,908.5Z
220.50
1,610.33
200.00
14~827.00
296.62
32.33
94.59
82,437.48
410.90
235.00
8,3bZ.44
91.55
1,290.00
22,872.00
8,236.20
69.15
64.71
250.76
8,593.03
245.00
400.00
420.00
206.44
CITY gF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
LIST OF WARRANTS
FOR PERIOD: ll-ZS-98 (g8/99)
RUN DATE: 11/24/98 PAGE: ~
VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMT.
~ CHECKJ OVERLAP
11166 TORWALDSON, STEVE DISMISSED PARKING CIT PMT 13¢080 ~l.00
4558 UoS. GUARDS COot INC. SECURITY GUARD SERVICE # 13¢081 Zt031.88
350 U.S. POSTMASTER POSTAGE LANDSCAPE NEWSLETTER 13¢082
g958 UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION UMP SERVICES # 13¢083 3t169.00
4788 UNDERGROUND SVC. ALERT OF SO. CALIF UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT 13¢08¢ Z12.75
3437 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFORM SERVICES # 13¢085 465.63
¢206 UNIQUE CREATIONS 15T AID KITS ~ 134086 238°39
1226 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE UPS SERVICE $ 134087 56°40
gGSg UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE POSTAGE METER MONTHLY SERVICES 134088
5285 VIKING TIRE VEHICLE SUPPLIES 134089 80o00
1103 VISTA PAINT MA:NT SUPPLIES 134090. 46~09
¢78 WARREN : CO., CARL LIABILITY CLAIMS # 13409! 866.04
213 WAXIE, KLEEN-LINE CORP MAZNT SUPPLIES i ~34092 3,334.13
4577 WELLS FARGO GUARD SERVICES SECURITY GUARD SERVICES 134093 ~,I05.77
5526 WEST GROUP PUBLISHING ~ 13¢094
30BO WHITTIER FERTILIZER LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES # ~34095 BOg.?4
X~63 WILLIAMS, ANGELIA RECREATION REFUNDS I34096 Z5~00
¢BZ7 WORLD BOOK DIRECT MARKETING LIBRARY SUPPLIES 134097 Zl.gO
675 WYNN°S FROSTEMP/MAXAIR VEHICLE MAINT SUPPLIES # I3~09B 518.~1
509 XEROX CORPORATION COPY MACHINE SUPPLIES/SERVICE 1340gg 303.78
1l~64 ZAROUR, MANAL R~CREATION REFUNDS 134X00 65.00
34B ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY VEHICLE MAINT SUPPLIES # 13410! 217.73
~l165 ZUNIGA, NANCY RECREATION REFUNDS 13410Z ZB.T5
TOTAL
Investments
~tes o~ De~W~ - Bank
Loc;d Agency Investment Funds
Total Inve~tm~lts and Avm~l~m
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
November 30, 1998
Cash
Accrued Interest at Purchase
Tolal Cash and Purchase Interest
Total Clah and Invegtments
Total Earnings
Current Year
Average Daily Balance /-)
Par Market Book
Value Value Value
8,310,532.20 8,310,532.20 8,310,532.20
15.941,372.24 15,941,372.24 15,941,372.24
59,515,000.00 59,949,637.50 59,485,865.60
2,000,000.00 2.022.600.00 1.996.250.00
100,591.82 104,342.26 95,648.00
85,867,496.26 86,328,484.20 85,829,666.04
1.318,206,18
87,185,702.44
November 30 Month Ending
488,070.89
87,317,983.09
Date
1,318,2o6.18
1,570.74
1,319,776.92
87,648,261.12
Fiscal Year To Date
2,262,223.96
87,670,508.79
6.16%
1,318,206.18
1,570.74
1,319,776.92
87,149,442.96
% of Days to YTM 3~0 YTM 365
Portfolio Term Maturity Equiv. Equiv.
9.68 365 138 5.438 5.512
18.57 1 I 5.481 5.557
6g.30 1,711 1,379 6.132 6.217
2.32 728 608 5.400 5.475
0.11 7,130 2,681 9.400 9.530
100.50% 1,246 987 5.930 6.012
Days to YTM 380 YTM 365
Term Maturity Equiv. Equiv.
1.973 2.000
1,246 987 5.930 6.012
I certify that this report accurately reflects all City pooled investments and is in comformity with the investment policy adopted October
7, 1998. A copy of the investment policy is available in the Administrative Services Department. The Investment Program herein
shown provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet the next six months estimated expenditures. The month-end mad(et values were
obtained from (IDC)-Interactive Data Corporation pdcing service.
Run Date: 12/0711998 · 17:0~
Portfolio CITY
CP
PM (PRF_PM1) SymRe134 VS.00g
CUSIP Imm~tment # Iseuer
243-954720 01013 CITIZENS BUSINESS BANK
243-954752 01023 CITIZENS BUSINESS BANK
6509-28~49 ~ 01012 SANWA
650928649 ~ 01014 SANWA
6509-28649 ~ 01021 SANWA
Subtotal end Average
Average
Balance
6,310,532.20
Local Agency Investment Funds
00005 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND
Subtotal and Average 16,934,705.57
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
FEDERAl. HOME LOAN BANK
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP.
FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN
Federal Agency Issues - Coupon
31331RAA3 00988
31331RDX0 00996
31331RMS1 01002
3133IRMA0 01004
31331RPZ2 01008
31331RUG8 01022
31331HRC3 01027
31331RYP4 01028
313393VK3 00971
3133~"YK5 00989
31331~TU5 00997
3133~ O1OO3
3133M2TM9 01005
3133M3KQ7 01011
3133~1 01019
3133M5874 O1O29
3133MSFX3 01031
3134A1LB4 00994
3134Al1'145 01 050
3134A13B4 01007
3134A14F4 01009
31~,A14R8 01010
3134A2PN2 01030
3134A2XJ2 01033
31354CRP5 00981
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details - Investments
November 30, 1998
Purchase
Date Par Value
Market Value
03/18/1998 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00
06/09/1998 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00
03/05/1998 1.000,000.00 1,000,000.00
03/16/1998 1,810,532.20 1,810,532.20
05/28/1998 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00
6,310,532.20 6,310,532.20
15,941,372.24
15,941,372.24
15,941,372.24
15,941,372.24
03/27/1997 2,000,000.00 2,041,800.00
07/17/1997 2,000,000.00 2,079,400.00
01/07/1998 1,000,000.00 1,011,900.00
01/06/1998 2,000,000.00 2,021,200.00
02/05/1998 2,500,000.00 2,504,750.00
05/27/1998 2,000,000.00 2,015,000.00
08/06/1998 1,515,000.00 1,518,787.50
08/1111998 2,000,000.00 2,011,200.00
03/1911996 1,000,000.00 1,001,900.00
04/02/1997 2,000,000.00 2,008,800.00
07/30/1997 1,000,000.00 1.009,400.00
01/06/1998 1,000,000.00 1.050,000.00
12/30/1997 1,000,000.00 1,055,600.00
02/27/1998 2,500,000.00 2,501,500.00
05/28/1998 2,000,000.00 2,001,800.00
08/27/1998 2,000,000.00 1,991:200.00
08/2611998 2,000,000.00 1,996,200.00
06/25/1997 3,000,000.00 3,054,300.00
10/22/1997 2,000,000.00 2,040,600.00
02/02/1998 1,000,000.00 998,800.00
02/18/1998 2,000,000.00 1,996,200.00
02/19/1998 1,000,000.00 997,800.00
08120/1998 2,000,000.00 1,996,800.00
11/24/1998 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00
111291199~ 2,000,000.00 2,019,400.00
Page 2
Stated YTM 360 Day~ to Maturity
Book Value Rate Moody's Equiv. Maturity Date
2,000,000.00 5.500 5.500 107 03/18/1999
2,000,000.00 5.400 5.400 190 05/0911999
1,000,000.00 5.500 5.500 98 03/0911999
1,810,532.20 5.400 5.400 105 03/16/1999
1,500,000.00 5.400 5400 176 0B/26/1~
6,310,532.20 6.438 138
15,g41,372.24
15,~41,372.24
5.557 5.481 1
5.481 I
2,000,000.00 6.620 6.529 1,212 03/27/2002
1,999,375.00 6.240 6.162 1,324 07/17/2002
1,000,000.00 6.330 6.243 1,498 01/07/2003
2,000,000.00 6.220 6.135 1,497 01/06/2003
2,500,000.00 6.140 5.973 1,527 02/05/2003
1,999,375.00 6.290 6.211 1,638 05/27/2003
1,514,303.10 5.500 5.472 245 08/03/1999
2,000,000.00 6.130 6.046 1,714 06/1112003
995,312.50 5.880 5.970 105 03/16/1999
2,000,000.00 6.540 6.450 853 04/02/2001
1,000,000.00 6.544 6.454 1,337 07/30/2002
1,000,000.00 6.230 6.145 1,497 01/(~/2003
1,000,000.00 6.110 6.028 1,123 12/28/2001
2,500,000.00 6.100 6.016 1,184 02/27/2002
2,000,000.00 6.130 6.048 1,274 05/28/2002
2,000,000.00 6.140 6.056 1,730 08/27/2003
2,000,000.00 6.050 5,g18 1,364 08/26/2002
3,000,000.00 6.630 6.537 1,150 01/24/2002
2,000,000.00 6.320 6.233 1,421 10/22/2002
99g,375.00 6.183 6.113 1,520 01/29/2003
2,000,000.00 6.160 6.076 1,540 02/16/2003
1,000,000.00 6.135 6.051 1,541 02/lg/2003
2,000,000.00 6.050 5.967 1,723 08/20/2003
2,000,000.00 5.790 5.711 1,819 11/24/2003
2,000,000.00 6.230 6.145 1,094 1112912001
Run Date: 17J0711996 - 17:08
Portfolio CITY
CP
(P~F_P~v~2) SymRe~ vs.oog
CUSIP Investment #
Federal Agency Issue~ - Coupon
31364CSJ8 00~4
31364CJ58 00992
31264FQE4 01O06
31384FC33 01016
31364FG96 01018
31364GBE8 01032
Treesuni Securities - Coupon
9126274M1 01026
Mortgage Backed Securities
3134OLWW7 0o071
3126(~J21 00203
36215wx74 ooo02
36215XZS4 00069
Average
Issuer Balance
FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN
FEDERAL NATL IvrrG ASSN
FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN
FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN
FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN
FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN
Subtotal and Avenge 58,864,0~8.73
TREASURY NOTE
Subtotal and Average
1,996,250.00
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP.
FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN
GOVERNMENT NATIONAL MORTG ASSN
GOVERNMENT NATIONAL MORTG ASSN
Subtotal and Average 96,653.75
Total Inv#t~ta and Aver~
86Ao2Ato.25
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details - Investments
November 30, 1998
Purchase
Date Par Value
Market Value
12/1 2/1996 2,000,000.00 2,001,800.00
05/05/1997 2,000,000.00 2,056,500.00
0112711998 4,000,000.00 4,006,400.00
05/04/1998 3,000,000.00 3,048,900.00
05/19/1998 2,000,000.00 2,027,600.00
10/06/1998 2,000,000.00 1,983,800.00
59,515,000.00 59,949,637.50
08103/1998
2,0~,600.00
02/23/1987 14,909.92 15,182.77
09115/1987 59,481.57 62,241.51
06/23/1986 24,507.74 25,171.90
05/23/1986 1,692.59 1,746.08
100,591.82 104,342.26
85,867,496.26
88,328,494.20
Page 3
Stated YTM 360 Days to Maturity
Book Value Rate Moody's Equiv. Maturity Date
1,980,000.00 6.160 6.291 1,109 12/14/2001
2,000,000.00 7.070 6.973 1,254 05/08/2002
3,998,125.00 0,150 6,077 1,518 0112712003
3,000,000.00 6.280 6.194 1,616 05/05/2003
2,000,000.00 6.125 6.041 1,630 05/1912003
2,000,000.00 5.670 5.592 1,770 10/06/2003
59,,485,665.60 6.132 1,379
1,996,250.00 5.375 5.400 608 0713112000
1,996,250.00 5.400 608
14,802.70 8.000 8.219 1,127 01/0112002
54,946.10 8.500 10.018 4,292 09/0112010
24,170.76 8.500 8.778 893 05/12/2001
1,726.44 9.000 8.547 835 03/15/2001
85,646.00 9.400 2,861
85,8~,6~6.04 5.6~ ~7
Ru~ Date: 12/071199~ - 17~3~
Portfolio CITY
CP
(PRF_P~!2) SymRe~ rS.00;
CUSIP Investment # ~
Checking/Savings Accounts
00180 BANK OF AMERICA
Cash Subtotal and Average
~ Interest at Purchaa4
Total Cash and Pu~ Interest
Total Cash and Investments
Average
Balance
1,115,772.85
87,317,983.09
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details - Cash
November 30, 1998
Purchase
Date Par Value
87,185,702,44
Market Value
1,318,206.18
87,648p~61.12
Stated YTM 360 Day~ to
Book Value Rate Moody's Equiv. Maturity
1,318,206.18
1,318,206.18
1,570.74
1,319,776.92
87,149,442.96
2.000 1.973 I
~7
Page 4
Ru~ Dete: 12/07/199~ - 17:08
P(xtfolio CITY
CP
PM (PRF_PId2) SymRept VS.00g
Portfolio Management
Investment Activity By Type
November 1, 1998 through November 30, 1998
Page 5
Beginning Stated Transaction Purchases
CUSIP Investment ~ Issuer Balance Rate Date or Deposits
Certificates of Deposit - Bank
Subtotal 8,310,532.20
Local Agency Investment Funds (Monthly Summary)
00005 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND 5.557 1,000,000.00
Subtotal 17,741,372.24 1,000,000.00
Checking/Savings Accounts (Monthly Summary)
00180 BANK OF AMERICA 2.000 3,368,000.00
Subtotal 581,206.18 3,368,000.00
Federal Agency Issues - Coupon
31339BZZ8 00940 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 5.240 11130/1998 0.00
3134A2XJ2 01033 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 5.790 11/24/1998 2,000,000.00
Subtotal 58,428,834.35 2,000,000.00
Treasury Securities - Coupon
Subtotal 1,996,250.00
313401WW7 00071 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 8.000 11/16/1998 0.00
31360BJ21 00203 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 8.500 11125/1998 0.00
36215WX74 00002 GOVERNMENT NATIONAL MORTG ASSN 6.500 11/t6/1998 · 0.00
36215XZS4 00069 GOVERNMENT NATIONAL MORTG ASSN 9.000 11/16/1998 0.00
Subtotal 97,422.90 0.00
Total 87,155,617.87 6,368,000.00
Sales/Maturities
or Withdrawals
2,800,000.00
2,800,000.00
2,631,000.00
2,631,000.00
942,968.75
0.00
942,968.75
496.65
397.66
823.36
59.23
1,776.90
6,375,745.65
Ending
Balance
8,310,532.20
15,941,372.24
1,318,206.18
58,4asAs6.~0
87,147,872.22
Ru~ Date: 12.~7119cJ6 - 17.1)6
Portfolio CITY
CP
PM (PRF_PM3) SymRep~ V5.00g
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY
SUBJECT:
December l 6, 1998
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Lucinda E. Hackett, Associate Engineer
APPROVAL AND EXECUTION OF A COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS / SAN
BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (SANBAG) AND
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FOR THE FUNDING OF THE
CONSTRUCTION OF THE HIGHLAND AVENUE REALIGNMENT AND THE
CONSTRUCTION OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD (HIGHLAND AVENUE /
DAY CREEK BOULEVARD PROJECT).
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached Resolution authorizing the execution
of a Cooperative Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and SANBAG (Contract No.
99-0 ! 5) for the funding and construction ofthe Highland Avenue Realignment and the construction
of Day Creek Boulevard (Highland Avenue/Day Creek Boulevard Project). A certified copy of the
Resolution along with the executed copies of the Cooperative Agreement will be forwarded to
SANBAG for their execution.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
In accordance with both CalTrans and SANBAG policy, Day Creek Boulevard must be in place
prior to the construction of the Route 30 Freeway in order for the Day Creek Boulevard interchange
to be constructed. The City is therefore moving forward with the construction of Day Creek
Boulevard from Highland Avenue to Base Line Road.
To allow for the construction of the Day Creek Boulevard interchange, Highland Avenue must be
substantially realigned to the south. This is required in order to provide room for the east bound
interchange ramps and to provide adequate separation, per CalTrans standards, between the ramp
intersection at Day Creek Boulevard and the intersection of Highland Avenue with Day Creek
Boulevard This realignment needs to be complete prior to the construction of the Day Creek
Boulevard interchange.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN
SANBAG AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
December 16, 1998
Page 2
The Day Creek Boulevard construction and the Highland Avenue realignment are closely related and
should occur in the same general time frame, therefore the two projects will be constructed together.
Under the terms of the Cooperative Agreement, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will administer the
contract and pay all costs associated with the construction of Day Creek Boulevard SANBAG will
reimburse the City for all costs associated with the construction of the Highland portion, and will
either directly provide construction management support or reimburse the City for those costs.
SANBAG will also provide plans, utility relocations, and right of way for the realignment project.
The City will administer the overall contract. The Agreement was approved by the SANBAG Board
of Directors on November 4, ! 998.
On November 4, 1998, the San Bernardino Associated Governments Board of Directors approved
by minute action the Cooperative Agreement. This agreement provides $1,518,743 of Measure I
Valley Project funds for construction plus of $225,000 for construction engineering, for a total of
$1,743,743.
The proposed cooperative agreement does not save SANBAG any costs, but it ensures that two
critical components necessary to allow Route 30 construction to proceed on schedule will be in
place.
Respectfully submitted,
William J. O'Neil,
City Engineer
WJO:LEH:Ieh
Attachment
5-
,~2ozzcr
!
L
NT,$,
FUTI/RE ~UTE 3Q FIT':
IIIGIi'uLID AV
&,q,SE LJIE RD
$UGMGITiI
PROJECT LIMIT
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
DAY CREEK BL. PROJECT
NTS
RESOLUTION NO. q ?.-,~,7 / 7
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE
EXECUTION OF THE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN
THE SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS / SAN
BERMARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY AND
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FOR THE PROPOSED
DESIGN, FUNDING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION
RESPONSIBILITIES OF HIGHLAND AVENUE / DAY CREEK
BOULEVARD PROJECT
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter referred to as
"City"), has for its consideration and execution, the Cooperative Agreement with the San Bernardino
Associated Governments / San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (hereinafter referred
to as "SANBAG") for the proposed Highland Avenue / Day Creek Boulevard Project and
WHEREAS, SANBAG and the City are in mutual accord with the conditions specified in
the attached Cooperative Agreement; and
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
I--fEREBY RESOLVES that said Cooperative Agreement be approved and accepted and authorize
the Mayor to execute the same, and direct the City Clerk to attach a certified copy of this resolution
to all copies of said Agreement and mail said copy to SANBAG.
/q
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
December 16, 1998
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Lucinda E. Hackett, Associate Engineer
APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE
INVITING BIDS" FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE HIGHLAND
AVENUE REALIGNMENT AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF DAY CREEK
BOULEVARD FROM HIGHLAND AVENUE TO BASE LINE ROAD TO BE
FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NO. 32.-4637-9710 AND ACCOUNT NO. 22-
4637-9710
'RECOMMENDATION:
It is hereby recommended that the City Council approve plans and specifications for the
construction of the Highland Avenue Realignment and the Construction of Day Creek Boulevard
from Highland Avenue to Base Line Road, and approve the attached resolution authorizing the
City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids".
BACKGRO UN D/A NA LYS IS:
Highland Avenue Realignment is from 1,247 feet west of Day Creek Boulevard to 787 feet east
of Day Creek Boulevard, the scope of work to be performed consists of, but is not limited to the
construction of asphalt concrete roadway, storm drain, concrete curb and gutter, installation of
a traffic signal, street lights, signing and striping. Day Creek Boulevard is from Base Line Road
to Highland Avenue, the scope of work consists of but is not limited to the construction of the
west half of the asphalt concrete roadway, storm drain, earthen channel, street lights, concrete
curb and gutter, traffic signing and striping. The project is to be funded from Measure 'T' funds,
Account No. 32-4637-9710 and Transportation System Development funds, Account No. 22-
4637-9710. Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt per Article 19, Section
15301(c) of the CEQA guidelines.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
CONSTRUCTION OF HIGHLAND AVENUE
REALIGNMENT AND THE CONSTRUCTION
OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD
December 16, 1998
Page 2
The Highland Avenue Realignment plans were prepared by Parsons, Brinckerhoff of San
Bernardino under the direction of SANBAG and approved by the City Engineer. The Day Creek
Boulevard plans and specifications have been completed by staff and approved be the City
Engineer. The Engineer's estimate for Highland Avenue is $1,331,260, the Engineer's estimate
for Day Creek Boulevard is $2,242,000. Legal advertising is scheduled for January 12, 1999 and
January 26, 1999, with bid opening at 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, February 16, 1999.
Respectfully submitted,
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:LEH:leh
Attachments
RESOLUTION NO. ~ 7-':;Z / ?
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF HIGHLAND
AVENUE REALIGNMENT AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF
DAY CREEK BOULEVARD FROM HIGHLAND AVENUE TO
BASE LINE ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT IN' SAID CITY
AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO
ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
WI-IEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain
improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the
construction of certain improvements.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by the
City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for "The
Construction of Highland Avenue Realignment and The Construction of Day Creek Boulevard From
Highland Avenue to Base Line Road Improvement Project".
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to
advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified
in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the
following words and figures, to wit:
"NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS"
Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County,
California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the said the City of Rancho
Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, on or before the hourof2:00 P.M. on February 16, 1999, sealed bids or proposals for
the "The Construction of Highland Avenue Realignment and The Construction of Day Creek
Boulevard From Highland Avenue to Base Line Road Improvement Project" in said City.
Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive,
Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia 91730.
Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, marked, "Bid for Construction of"The Construction of Highland Avenue Realignment
and The Construction of Day Creek Boulevard From Highland Avenue to Base Line Road
Improvement Project".
PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California
Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles I and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less
than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in
which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages
for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations
of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem
wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and
are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of
such determinations to be posted at the job site.
Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman,
or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or
mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work
done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the pro-
visions of said Labor Code.
Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning
the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him.
Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any
apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the
public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate
of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in
the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be
less than one to five except:
When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee
has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of
certificate, or
go
When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five,
or
Go
When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through
apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or
When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all
of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight
journeymen.
The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration
of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices orjoumeymen in any apprenticable
trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such
contributions.
The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections
1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices.
Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements
may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of
Apprenticeship, San Francisco, Califomia, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and
its branch offices.
Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the
execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and
be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in
Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended.
The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five
dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract,
by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each
calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor
more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code.
Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the
work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable
collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8.
The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's
bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (10%
of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the
same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check,
certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount
of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference
between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest
bidder.
The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said
work shall be one hundred percent (I 00%) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in
an amount equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price for said work shall be given
to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the
work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and
the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance
covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between
him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work.
No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been
issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
Contractor shall possess any and all contractors licenses, in form and class as required by any
and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract;
including but not limited to a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) or Class
"LICENSE" in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business
and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulation adopted pursuant thereto.
The Contractor, pursuant to the "Califomia Business and Professions Code", Section
7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date,
and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being
provided is true and correct.
The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho
Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City
Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of
$35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS), said $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS) is nonrefundable.
Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed
when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional
nonreimbursable payment of $15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges
and overhead.
The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of
Rancho Cucamonga.
In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth
in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the
Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense,
substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention).
The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reject any and all bids.
By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Dated this 16th day of December 1998.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
this 16th day of December 1998.
William J. Alexander, Mayor
ATTEST:
Debbie J. Adams, City Clerk
ADVERTISE ON:
January 12, 1999
January 26, 1999
...F'-
NT.S.
ORJG/HAL
POOR QUALITy
LOCATION
DAY CREE'~ BLVD.
CITY OF
R,LNCHO CU,fA!'/,ONCA
- CJTY ()F RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
December 16, 1998
TO:
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM:
Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director
BY:
Joan A. Kruse, Purchasing Manager
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL TO DECLARE SURPLUS MISCELLANEOUS CITY-
OWNED EOUIPMENT
RECOMMENDATION
That City Council approval be given to surplus the City-owned equipment on the attached listing
which is either no longer needed, obsolete or unusable.
BACKGROUND
The City's purchasing manual identifies two major categories of surplus property: material and
supplies, and capital equipment. It has been the policy of the City to request that the City
Council provide authorization to the Purchasing Manager to dispose of City property by
declaring such items surplus. Methods of surplus can be transfer to another department, trade-in,
sale by bid or auction, sale as scrap, donation, or simply disposing of the equipment.
The majority of items to be surplused is computer-related equipment. If Council is in agreement,
this equipment will be given to the Detwiler Foundation Computer for Schools Program which is
based in La Jolla, California. This organization, in conjunction with the California Department
of Corrections, refurbishes and upgrades equipment and in turn donates it to area schools. All
City school districts were contacted and declined the City's offer of donation of these computers.
Respectfully submitted,
Lawrence i~
Attach.
SURPLUS EQUIPMENT
Echo PB 400E Backpack Blower, Tag E5166, S/N 236966
Key Duplicating Machine, Fixed Asset #637
Dictaphone Transcription Unit, Fixed Asset #00767
Unit 512, Fixed Asset #0026, 1984 Chevrolet C20 Pick Up Truck
Mita DC-111 Copier, Fixed Asset # E677
Unit 514, Fixed Asset #0764, 1988 Ford Pick Up Truck
HARDWARE
DESCRIPTION
1 HP ERGO MONITOR
2 HP VECTRA CPU
3 HP ERGO MONITOR
4 HP VECTRA CPU
5 HP ERGO MONITOR
6 HP VECTRA CPU
7 HP ERGO MONITOR
8 HP VECTRA CPU
9 HP ERGO MONITOR
10 HP VECTRA CPU
11 HP ERGO MONITOR
12 HP VECTRA CPU
13 HP ERGO MONITOR
14 HP VECTRA CPU
15 HP ERGO MONITOR
16 HP VECTRA CPU
17 HP ERGO MONITOR
18 HP VECTRA CPU
19 HP ERGO MONITOR
20 HP VECTRA CPU
21 HP ERGO MONITOR
22 HP VECTRA CPU
23 HP ERGO MONITOR
24 HP VECTRA CPU
25 HP ERGO MONITOR
26 HP VECTRA CPU
27 HP ERGO MONITOR
28 HP VECTRA CPU
29 HP ERGO MONITOR
30 HP VECTRA CPU
31 HP ERGO MONITOR
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
SURPLUSED HARDWARE
PREPARED B Y: INFORMATION SYSTEM DEPT.
SERIAL NUMBER F/A # LOC. BOX #
KR42355176 G.D. 14
3424A05900 01288 G.D. 14
KR42456213 G.D. 15
3419A00365 01317 G.D. 15
KR43402126 G.D. 16
3424A04885 01300 G.D. 16
KR42354835 G,D. 17
3424A04783 01260 G.D. 17
KR42355140 G.D. 18
3419A00359 01243 G.D. 18
KR42355175 G.D. 19
3424A05010 01312 G.D. 19
KR54267390 G.D. 20
3419A01136 01223 G.D. 20
KR42354973 G.D. 21
3424A05757 01291 G.D. 21
KR42051504 G.D. 22
3424A04985 01311 G.D. 22
KR42354999 G.D. 23
3424A05008 01316 G.D. 23
KR42354994 G.D. 24
3424A04781 01315 G.D. 24
KR42355173 26
3424A05814 01289 26
KR42355159 27
3424A05009 01318 27.
KR42051426 28
3424A06063 01287 28
KR42353737 29
3424A04798 01268 29
KR33401555 30
11/17/98
COMMENTS
DAWN BATES
DAWN BATES
KAREN FINCHER
KAREN FINCHER
GEORGE RIVERA
GEORGE RIVERA
DIANE MONROE
DIANE MONROE
LARRY TEMPLE
LARRY TEMPLE
BRIGIT TATE
BRIGIT TATE
GUEST (GIS)
GUEST (GIS)
JOAN KRUSE
JOAN KRUSE
RONDA CONNELLY
RONDA CONNELLY
MARY ANN SALAIZ
MARY ANN SALAIZ
SUSAN FERNANDEZ
SUSAN FERNANDEZ
CHUCK VARNEY
CHUCK VARNEY
CAROLE GONZALEZ
CAROLE GONZALEZ
DENISE UDELL
DENISE UDELL
SHIRR'L GRIFFIN
SHIRR'L GRIFFIN
KATHY SCOTT
PAGE 1
HARDWARE
DESCRIPTION
32 HP VEGTRA CPU
33 HP ERGO MONITOR
34 HP VECTRA CPU
35 HP ERGO MONITOR
36 HP VECTRA CPU
37 HP ERGO MONITOR
38 HP VECTRA CPU
39 NBI SYSTEM
LOCAL DATA INC. QUIET
4O 300
41 COMPUSCAN
42 CALCOMP 1044
43 HP ERGO MONITOR
44 HP VECTRA CPU
45 HP ERGO MONITOR
46 HP VECTRA CPU
47 HP ERGO MONITOR
48 HP VECTRA CPU
49 HP ERGO MONITOR
50 HP VECTRA CPU
51 HP ERGO MONITOR
52 HP VECTRA CPU
53 HP ERGO MONITOR
54 HP VECTRA CPU
55 HP ERGO MONITOR
56 HP VECTRA CPU
57 HP ERGO MONITOR
58 HP VECTRA CPU
59 HP ERGO MONITOR
60 HP VECTRA CPU
61 HP ERGO MONITOR
62 HP VECTRA CPU
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
SURPLUSED HARDWARE
PREPARED BY: INFORMATION SYSTEM DEPT.
11/17/98
SERIALNUMBER F/A# LOC. BOX#
3424A05826 01269 30
KR41542705 31
3424A06007 01270 31
KR42355158 32
3424A04928 01265 32
KR42355153 33
3424A04862 01266 33
452571 00463 34
81205475
738D004
KR42355171
3419A01139
KR42354836
3424A04788
KR42355182
3424A05006
KR53459406
3419A00353
KR42355185
3424A05815
KR42353696
3424A04754
KR42355131
3424A05816
KR42355167
3424A04863
KR42456199
3424A05941
KR42051841
3424A05656
00274 35
E608 36
00501 37
38
01259
01248
01295
01297
01242
1307
01244
01331
01336
01346
PAGE 2
COMMENTS
KATHY SCOTT
DIANE O'NEAL
DIANE O'NEAL
JERRY FULWOOD
JERRY FULWOOD
DEBBIE ADAMS
DEBBIE ADAMS
MARTI HIGGINS
38 MARTI HIGGINS
39 JANA ELLIS
39 JANA ELLIS
40 BLDG SAFTY CASE
40 BLDG SAFTY CASE
41 BLDG SAFTY COUNTER
41 BLDG SAFTY COUNTER
42 MELISSA MORALES
42 MELISSA MORALES
43 BEA SMIDEALE
43 BEA SMIDEALE
44 DONNA AUSTIN
44 DONNA AUSTIN
45 LUCI URIBE
45 LUCI URIBE
46 TAMMY PELTZER
46 TAMMY PELTZER
47 JOI SIMPSON
47 JOI SIMPSON
HARDWARE
DESCRIPTION
63 HP ERGO MONITOR
84 HP VECTRA CPU
65 HP ERGO MONITOR
66 HP VECTRA CPU
67 HP ERGO MONITOR
68 HP VECTRA CPU
69 HP ERGO MONITOR
70 HP VECTRA CPU
71 HP ERGO MONITOR
72 HP VECTRA CPU
73 HP ERGO MONITOR
74 HP VECTRA CPU
75 HP ERGO MONITOR
76 HP VECTRA CPU
77 HP ERGO MONITOR
78 HP VECTRA CPU
79 HP ERGO MONITOR
80 HP VECTRA CPU
81 HP ERGO MONITOR
82 HP VECTRA CPU
83 HP ERGO MONITOR
84 HP VECTRA CPU
85 HP ERGO MONITOR
86 HP VECTRA CPU
87 HP ERGO MONITOR
88 HP VECTRA CPU
89 HP ERGO MONITOR
90 HP VECTRA CPU
91 HP ERGO MONITOR
92 HP VECTRA CPU
93 HP ERGO MONITOR
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
SURPLUSED HARDWARE
PREPARED BY: INFORMATION SYSTEM DEPT.
11/17/98
SERIAL NUMBER F/A #
KR42355267
3424A04929 01322
KR3371195
3424A04882 01323
KR52955332
3424A04905 01271
KR42353697
3424A04889 01332
KR33812729
3424A04921 01321
KR42352393
3419A00371 01320
KR42776986
3419A01137 01308
KR43403030
3434A03850 00308
KR43400113
3424A06103 01334
KR42354787
3424A04855 01298
KR33813985
3419A00347 01220
KR33711133
3419A00356 01241
KR33711197
3424A05904 01281
KR42355157
3424A0478 01258
KR42051474
3424A04769 01275
KR42355009
LOC.
BOX # COMMENTS
48 JEANENNE SPIKES
48 JEANENNE SPIKES
49 SONIA MULLIGAN
49 SONIA MULLIGAN
50 MARY LOU GREGG
50 MARY LOU GREGG
51 JOYCE KESSLER
51 JOYCE KESSLER
52 GAlL SANCHEZ
52 GAlL SANCHEZ
53 NINA MONTANO
53 NINA MONTANO
54 MARY VOSS
54 MARY VOSS
55 RICK GOMEZ
55 RICK GOMEZ
56 COMM. SVCS. GENERAL
56 COMM. SVCS. GENERAL
57 RAMON RAMIREZ
57 RAMON RAMIREZ
58 PAT MORRISON
58 PAT MORRISON
59 TRIClA ASHBY
59 TRIClA ASHBY
61 JERRY DYER
61 JERRY DYER
62 MIKE LONG
62 MIKE LONG
63 SUE DODRILL
63 SUE DODRILL
64 LINDA BEEK
PAGE 3
HARDWARE
DESCRIPTION
94 HP VECTRA CPU
95 HP ERGO MONITOR
96 HP VECTRA CPU
97 HP ERGO MONITOR
98 HP VECTRA CPU
99 HP ERGO MONITOR
100 HP VECTRA CPU
101 HP ERGO MONITOR
102 HP VECTRA CPU
103 HP ERGO MONITOR
104 HP VECTRA CPU
105 HP ERGO MONITOR
106 HP VECTRA CPU
107 HP ERGO MONITOR
108 HP VECTRA CPU
109 HP ERGO MONITOR
110 HP VECTRA CPU
111 HP ERGO MONITOR
112 HP VECTRA CPU
113 HP ERGO MONITOR
114 HP VECTRA CPU
115 HP ERGO MONITOR
116 HP VECTRA CPU
117 HP ERGO MONITOR
118 HP VECTRA CPU
119 HP ERGO MONITOR
120 HP VECTRA CPU
121 HP ERGO MONITOR
122 HP VECTRA CPU
123 HP ERGO MONITOR
124 HP VECTRA CPU
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
SURPLUSED HARDWARE
PREPARED BY: INFORMATION SYSTEM DEPT.
SERIALNUMBER F/A#
3424A04913 01257
KR43503076
3419A01130 01222
KR42355019
3419A00362 01256
KR42354880
3424A04872 01279
KR42355141
3419A00870 01273
KR42354984
3424A04986 01276
KR42051513
3424A05903 01277
KR42353658
3424A04950 01254
KR42354841
3424A04977 01253
KR42051518
3419A00350 01249
KR42354988
3419A00342 01255
KR4235165
3424A05828 01335
KR42355134
3424A04766 000109
KR33711202
3424A04930 01282
KR42355292
3419A00357 01221
KR42051498
3424A04940 01293
LOC.
11/17/98
BOX # COMMENTS
64 LINDA BEEK
65 LUCI SAUNDERS
65 LUCI SAUNDERS
66 JUDY ACOSTA
66 JUDY ACOSTA
67 LINDA WYMAN
67 LINDA WYMAN
68 VICKI DAY-CHILICKI
68 VICKI DAY-CHILICKI
69 ENG. SECRETARY POOL
69 ENG. SECRETARY POOL
70 DIANE WHYTE
70 DIANE WHYTE
71 AKBAR RIZVI
71 AKBAR RIZVI
72 MIKE OLIVIER
72 MIKE OLIVIER
73 JON GILLESPIE
73 JON GILLESPIE
74 JIM HARRIS
74 JIM HARRIS
75 COMM. SVCS. OLD REG.
75 COMM. SVCS. OLD REG.
77 BARRYE HANSON
77 SURPLUS 2
78 KAREN MCQUIRE-EMERY
78 KAREN MCQUIRE-EMERY
80 LAURA BONACORSI
80 LAURA BONACORSI
81 RON NEE
81 RON NEE
PAGE 4
HARDWARE
DESCRIPTION
125 HP ERGO MONITOR
126 HP VECTRA CPU
127 HP ERGO MONITOR
128 HP VECTI:~, CPU
129 HP ERGO MONITOR
130 HP VECTRA CPU
131 HP ERGO MONITOR
132 HP VECTRA CPU
133 COMPAQ CPU
134 COMPAQ MONITOR
135 HP ERGO MONITOR
136 HP VECTRA CPU
137 HP ERGO MONITOR
138 HP VECTRA CPU
139 HP ERGO MONITOR
140 HP VECTRA CPU
141 HP ERGO MONITOR
142 HP VECTRA CPU
143 HP ERGO MONITOR
144 HP VECTRA CPU
145 COMPAQ CPU
146 COMPAQ MONITOR
147 HP ERGO MONITOR
148 HP VECTRA CPU
149 HP ERGO MONITOR
150 HP VECTRA CPU
151 COMPAQ MONITOR
152 HP VECTRA CPU
153 COMPAQ CPU
154 COMPAQ MONITOR
155 COMPAQ CPU
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
SURPLUSED HARDWARE
PREPARED BY: INFORMATION SYSTEM DEPT.
SERIALNUMBER F/A# LOC. BOX#
KR42051357 85
3424A04780 01252 85
KR42355053 86
3424A05605 01285 86
KR42355174 87
3424A04963 01286 87
KR42051907 88
3420A00865 01215 88
CNT75MBF74A 01153 90
0281454~4N585 90
KR52956198 91
3420A00521 01213 91
KR42456200 92
3424A0770 01250 92
KR43403035 93
3434A0249 000191 93
KR43499252 94
3424A04799 0000111 94
KR43808579 95
3434A04237 000197 95
6247HBN20852 000002 96
2274260H9605 96
KR47051445 97
3419A03687 01274 97
KR42051501 102
:3424A04891 01294 102
334401U293 105
3419A00338 01208 105
A339HER31756 01157 106
33442601U291 106
A339HER341384 01156 108
PAGE 5
11/17/98
COMMENTS
KEN FUNG
BARRYE HANSON
LORETTA LOIKO
LORETTA LOIKO
CHRIS PITTENGER
CHRIS PITTENGER
LIRIO ROSAS
LIRIO ROSAS
LIBRARY
LIBRARY
PARTS WAREHOUSE
PARTS WAREHOUSE
ANTHONY ALVAREZ
ANTHONY ALVAREZ
CURT LANCE
CURT LANCE
ROB BOCK
ROB BOCK
MARIA PEREZ
MARIA PEREZ
LOUISE LANTZ
LOUISE LANTZ
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
JOE HENRY
HAR.DWAR
DESCRIPTION
156 HP ERGO MONITOR
157 COMPAQ MONITOR
158 HP VECTRA CPU
159 ASI MONITOR
160 HP VECTRA CPU
161 COMPAQ CPU
162 COMPAQ MONITOR
163 HP ERGO MONITOR
164 HP VECTRA CPU
165 HP ERGO MONITOR
166 HP VECTRA CPU
167 HP ERGO MONITOR
168 HP VECTRA CPU
169 HP ERGO MONITOR
170 HP VECTRA CPU
171 HP ERGO MONITOR
172 HP VECTRA CPU
173 HP ERGO MONITOR
174 HP VECTRA CPU
175 HP ERGO MONITOR
176 HP PENTIUM 586 CPU
177 HP ERGO MONITOR
178 HP VECTRA CPU
179 HP ERGO MONITOR
180 HP VECTRA CPU
181 HP ERGO MONITOR
182 HP VECTRA CPU
183 COMPAQ 386 CPU
184 COMPAQ MONITOR
185 COMPAQ MONITOR
186 HP VECTRA CPU
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
SURPLUSED HARDWARE
PREPARED BY: INFORMATION SYSTEM DEPT.
SERIAL NUMBER F/A #
KR34218781
02814544N812
3424A04809 01272
0384U1C2124
3424A05759 01330
A339H ER31047 01155
3.34426E+ 11
KR33813062
3424A05989 01328
KR33813064
3424A04931 01310
KR42353665
3424A05028
KR33813060
3420A00530 01216
KR42355001
3419A01133 01225
KR33813072
3424A04771 01261
KR42051838
3415S00659 01201
KR33812725
3424A05702 01290
KR33812732
3424A05589 01278
KR33812721
3419A01138 01251
4034HT8H 1444 00867
02814544N400
02814544N975
3424A05906 01284
LOC.
11/17/98
PAGE 6
BOX # COMMENTS
108 JOE HENRY
111
111
112
112
113
113
115
115
116
116
118
118
119
119
120
120
122
122
123
123
124 BRAD BULLER
124 BRAD BULLER
125 DAN COLEMAN
125 DAN COLEMAN
126
126
127
127
128
128
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
2O9
210
211
212
213
214
215
HARDWARE
DESCRIPTION
HP ERGO MONITOR
HP VECTRA PENTIUM
CPU
CTX MONITOR
HP VECTRA CPU
NBI 2000 WORKSTATION
W/KEYBOARD
DIABLO 630 PRINTER
NBI CPU SYSTEM W/
SAMSUNG MONITOR
HP LASER JET III
HP LASER JET IIID
HP ERGO 1024 MONITOR
HP VECTRA CPU
HP ERGO 1024 MONITOR
HP VECTRA CPU
HP ERGO 1024 MONITOR
HP VECTRA CPU
HP ERGO 1024 MONITOR
HP VECTRA CPU
HP DESKJET 2686A
APPLE CPU
APPLE MONITOR
HP ERGO 1024 MONITOR
HP VECTRA CPU
APPLE CPU
APPLE MONITOR
HP ERGO 1024 MONITOR
HP VECTRA CPU
HP DESKJET 660C
APPLE CPU
APPLE MONITOR
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
SURPLUSED HARDWARE
PREPARED BY: INFORMATION SYSTEM DEPT.
SERIALNUMBER F/A# LOC. BOX#
KR42354838 129
US72707113 286
28064907071
3424A05007 01283
GAl186018 00306
48325
AA1735008 00329 135
310FJD5782 136
B3022J16530 00843 137
KR42355151 139
3419A00361 01327 139
MY53418667 140
3419A00348 01236 140
KR42355164 141
3419A00108 01224 141
KR42355178 142
3424A04959 01303 142
2424179549 00128 143
F8459THM5030 00683 144
5113640 144
MY52602279 145
3420A00697 01212 145
FC4201EX2Q4 01348 147
5036337 147
KR42355005 148
3424A05846 01302 148
SG55B130KF 150
F1045KXOC53 00868 151
5494918 151
11/17/98
COMMENTS
RENEE TOBIN
129 RENEE TOBIN
131 LIBRARY CHILD. ClRCUL.
131 SURPLUS 2
133 PERSONNEL
134 PERSONNEL
MIS COMPUTER ROOM
PLANNING
PLANNING
PAGE 7
HARDWARE
DESCRII:'TION
216 HP ERGO 1024 MONITOR
217 HP VECTRA CPU
218 HP ERGO 1024 MONITOR
219 HP VECTRA CPU
220 HP ERGO 1024 MONITOR
221 HP VECTRA CPU
222 COMPAQ 386 CPU
223 COMPAQ KEYBOARD
224 COMPAQ MONITOR
225 AMADEX DP96258
226 AMDEK MONITOR
227 APPLE COLOR MONITOR
228 APPLE COLOR MONITOR
229 APPLE COLOR MONITOR
230 APPLE COLOR MONITOR
APPLE COLOR RGB
231 MONITOR
APPLE EXTENDED
232 KEYBOARD
233 APPLE IMAGE WRITER II
234 APPLE IMAGEWRITER
235 APPLE LASER IIG
236 APPLE LASER PRINTER
237 APPLE MAC II
238 APPLE MAC MONITOR
239 APPLE MACINTOSH II
APPLE MACINTOSH
240 KEYBOARD
APPLE MACINTOSH
241 KEYBOARD
APPLE MACINTOSH
242 KEYBOARD
APPLE MACINTOSH
244 MONITOR
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
SURPLUSED HARDWARE
PREPARED BY: INFORMATION SYSTEM DEPT.
SERIAL NUMBER F/A # LOC.
KR33813084
3424A04932 01280
KR42355004
3424A05033 01292
KR42354840
3424A04858 01325
4026HAN10618 00851
21808
23042601 C757
U03039 00305
87622837 SURPLUS 2
5012673 SURPLUS 2
5040525 SURPLUS 2
5049290 SURPLUS 2
5236002 SURPLUS 2
7044282
219087 SURPLUS 2
TF0441Q 1%C0090LLA
472399 SURPLUS 1
CA1123GV%M6000
FA00848 SURPLUS 1
FA190BOM5030 00566 SURPLUS 2
5101715 SURPLUS 2
F8048S8 SURPLUS 2
AP0411HN SURPLUS 2
MA1132SF SURPLUS 2
N/A N/A SURPLUS 2
HT124XA8M0404 SURPLUS 2
BOX #
~52
152
~§3
PAGE 8
11/17/98
COMMENTS
HARDWARE
DESCRIPTION
245 APPLE MACINTOSH SE
246 APPLE MACINTOSH SI
247 APPLE MACINTOSH SI
248 APPLE MONITOR
249 APPLE MONITOR
250 APPLE MONITOR
251 APPLE MONITOR
252 APPLE MONITOR
253 APPLE SCANNER
254 AST BRAVO 386
255 AST BRAVO 387
256 AST BRAVO 388
257 AST BRAVO 389
258 AST BRAVO 390
259 AST BRAVO 391
260 AST BRAVO 392
261 AST BRAVO 393
262 AST MONITOR
263 AST MONITOR
264 AST MONITOR
265 AST MONITOR
266 AST PC
267 AST VGA MONITOR
268 ATT MONITOR
269 ATT PC
270 BERNOULLI HARD DRIVE
271 CARD KEY
CENTRONIC LASER
272 PRINTER
273 CLONE PC
274 CLONE PC
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
SURPLUSED HARDWARE
PREPARED BY: INFORMATION SYSTEM DEPT.
SERIAL NUMBER F/A # LOC.
F8494UM5010 SURPLUS 2
F114245MC53 SURPLUS 2
F11447WJC53 SURPLUS 2
5048317
5055844 SURPLUS 1
5101715 SURPLUS 1
5118845 SURPLUS 1
7044275
8470764 00657 SURPLUS 1
TWB3052248 SURPLUS 1
TWB3051914 SURPLUS 1
TWB3053533 SURPLUS 1
TWB3052269 SURPLUS 1
TWB3051570 SURPLUS 1
TWB3053484 SURPLUS 1
TWB3053577 SURPLUS 1
TWB3052238 SURPLUS 1
038441C2337 SURPLUS 1
0384U1C2075 SURPLUS 2
0384UIC2337 SURPLUS 2
0384ULC26149 SURPLUS 2
TWB352238 SURPLUS 2
0384U 1 C2330
0384U1C1866 SURPLUS 2
627280 SURPLUS 1
7710320046 SURPLUS 1
11-0530-05 SURPLUS 1
66208419 00135 SURPLUS 1
321024721 SURPLUS 2
N/A N/A SURPLUS 2
BOX #
PAGE 9
11/17/98
COMMENTS
HARDWAR~
DESCRIPTION
m
275 CLONE PC
276 COMPAQ 3 PORTABLE
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
3O2
303
3O4
305
COMPAQ 3 PORTABLE
COMPAQ 386 CPU
COMPAQ 386 CPU
COMPAQ 386 CPU
COMPAQ 386 CPU
COMPAQ 386 CPU
COMPAQ 386 CPU
COMPAQ 386 CPU
COMPAQ 38620E
COMPAQ CPU
COMPAQ CPU
COMPAQ DESKPRO 386
COMPAQ FLOPPY DRIVE
COMPAQ MONITOR
COMPAQ MONITOR
COMPAQ MONITOR
COMPAQ MONITOR
COMPAQ MONITOR
COMPAQ MONITOR
COMPAQ MONITOR
COMPAQ MONITOR
COMPAQ MONITOR
COMPAQ MONITOR
COMPAQ MONITOR
COMPAQ MONITOR
COMPAQ PROLINEA
DEST SCANNER 1000
DIGITAL MONITOR
DYNA FILE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
SURPLUSED HARDWARE
PREPARED BY: INFORMATION SYSTEM DEPT.
SERIAL NUMBER
1726AL2B0040
1730AL2B1017
4034HT8H1713
4034HT8H2321
4034 HT8H2513
4034HT8H2549
403HAN20182
4844HS4H0285
4929HT2H0189
4036HS8H0173
4032HAN201189
4041 HS8H0020
4034HT8H2519
1038AAK10149
37145440623
37145440629
02814544N374
02814544N391
02814544N594
02829816M903
14714544M1457
23042601 C787
4034HT8 H 1394
4202HBR10716
82114544B530
94514544E924
A339HER31375
8A72505567
TA635D3454
DF16533
F/A # LOC.
00101 SURPLUS2
00497 SURPLUS 2
00492 SURPLUS 2
SURPLUS 1
00869 SURPLUS 1
SURPLUS 1
00856 SURPLUS 1
SURPLUS 1
SURPLUS 1
00838 SURPLUS 2
21809 157
00837 158
00864 SURPLUS 2
SURPLUS 1
SURPLUS 1
SURPLUS 1
21311 157
SURPLUS 2
SURPLUS 1
SURPLUS 2
SURPLUS 1
158
01153 SURPLUS 2
00626 SURPLUS 1
00746 SURPLUS 2
BOX #
PAGE 10
11/17/98
COMMENTS
HARDWARE
DESCRIPTION
306 DYNAFILE 360K
307 EPSON FX100 PRINTER
308 EPSON LQ 2550 PRINTER
309 EPSON PRINTER
310 EPSON PRINTER
311 HP 1280 17" MONITOR
312 HP 7475A PLOTTER
402 HP DESKJET 520
313 HP DESKJET 660
314 PRINTER/FEEDER
315 HP ERGO
316 HP ERGO 1024 MONITOR
317 HP ERGO 1024 MONITOR
318 HP ERGO 1024 MONITOR
319 HP ERGO MONITOR
320 HP ERGO MONITOR
321 HP ERGO MONITOR
322 HP LASER III D
323 HP LASER JET lid
324 HP LASER JET IV PLUS
325 HP PENTIUM 586 CPU
326 HP PENTIUM 586 CPU
327 HP PLOTTER
328 HP VECTRA 486
329 HP VECTRA 486
330 HP VECTRA 486
331 HP VECTRA 486
332 HP VECTRA 486
333 HP VECTRA 486
334 HP VECTRA 486
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
SURPLUSED HARDWARE
PREPARED BY: INFORMATION SYSTEM DEPT.
SERIAL NUMBER F/A # LOC.
DF04828 00571 SURPLUS 1
545534 00133 SURPLUS 2
00F0007200 F00669 SURPLUS 2
4011237 00266 SURPLUS 1
11015308 00517 SURPLUS 1
JP41512933 SURPLUS 2
2807V85916 00687
US45Q1502F SURPLUS 1
BOX #
SG55A130BG
MY4952M031
KR42051500
KR42051519
KR42355150
KR53964277
3490O 176
KR41037061
KR60190711
3022J165228
2934H19021
JPFF014118
3415500589
3415500667
2517A23463
3419A00036
3419A00340
3419A00341
3424A04743
3424A04841
3424A04993
3424A05005
00846
00825
012O0
01203
01327
01236
O1237
OO118
01264
01309
01304
SURPLUS 1
SURPLUS 1
160
SURPLUS 2
SURPLUS 2
SURPLUS 1
SURPLUS 1
SURPLUS I
SURPLUS 2
SURPLUS 1
SURPLUS 1
SURPLUS 1
SURPLUS 2
SURPLUS 2
SURPLUS 2
SURPLUS 2
SURPLUS 2
SURPLUS 2
SURPLUS 2
PAGE 11
11/17/98
COMMENTS
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
401
HARDWARE
DESCRIPTION
HP VECTRA 486
HP VECTRA 486
HP VECTRA 486 CPU
HP VECTRA 486 CPU
HP VECTRA 486 CPU
HP VECTRA 486 CPU
HP VECTRA 486 CPU
HP VECTRA 486 CPU
HP VECTRA 486 CPU
HP VECTRA 486 CPU
HP VECTRA 486 CPU
HP VECTRA 486 CPU
HP VECTRA 486 CPU
HP VECTRA 486 CPU
HP VECTRA 486 CPU
HP VECTRA 486 CPU
HP VECTRA 486 CPU
HP VECTRA 486 CPU
HP VECTRA 486 CPU
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
SURPLUSED HARDWARE
PREPARED BY: INFORMATION SYSTEM DEPT.
SERIAL NUMBER F/A # LOC.
3424A05604 01301 SURPLUS 2
3425A05748 01238 SURPLUS 2
3419A00351 01227
3419A00354 01326
3419A00364 01206 SURPLUS 1
3419A01134 01235 SURPLUS 1
3420A00463 01234
3424A04861 01305
3424A04868 01299
3424A04870 01306
3424A04934 01262
3424A04995 01313
3424A05616 000121
3424A05617 000141 SURPLUS 1
3424A05827 01245
3424A05876 01240
3424A06060 01263
3434A04611 01361
3424A05853 01246 SURPLUS 1
353 HP VECTRA PENTIUM US71705764 01662 SURPLUS 2
354 HP VECTRA PENTIUM US72707381 01657 SURPLUS 2
355 HP VECTRA PENTIUM 586 3415S00672 01202 SURPLUS 1
356 IBM PC 51621066654 SURPLUS 1
357 IBM XT 3026621 SURPLUS 2
358 IBM XT 5.1621E+11 SURPLUS 2
359 IRWIN DISK DRIVE 0001149BX-01 00510 SURPLUS 1
360 LEAR MONITOR 9003
361 LINE MISER 00173 SURPLUS 1
362 MAC II F47466L5 00538 SURPLUS 2
363 MAC II F820087 SURPLUS 2
BOX #
11/17/98
COMMENTS
PAGE 12
HARDWARE
DESCRIPTION
364 MAC II Cl
365 MAC PORTRAIT DISP.
366 MACINTOSH CPU
367 MACINTOSH II
368 MACINTOSH II
369 MACINTOSH II Cl
370 MCG MONITOR
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
SURPLUSED HARDWARE
PREPARED BY: INFORMATION SYSTEM DEPT.
SERIAL NUMBER F/A # LOC.
F11521C8724
F114241TC53 01128
F11517E0724 SURPLUS 1
F8190BOM5030 00566 SURPLUS 1
F849UVM5030 00681 SURPLUS 1
F1141FWM724 SURPLUS 1
HYCB300894 SURPLUS 2
BOX #
1/17/98
COMMENTS
371 MGC MONITOR
H1CB300894 159
372 MTI PC
373 CASH/PRINTER
374 CASH/PRINTER
375 NEC MONITOR
002-0020893730
02-0020893730
71D08803C
O0100
00773
00773
SURPLUS 2
SURPLUS 1
376 NEC MONITOR
377 NEC SPINWRITER
378 PRINTER
379 OKIDATA PRINTER
380 ONYX C5000
381 PANASONIC KX-P1123
382 PANASYNC MONITOR
383 POLAROID PALLET PLUS
74D08562W
5420617781
5420617781
185258
12906
2BMDL53527
KH2141488
WM7218C
OO473
00221
00221
00118
00304
SURPLUS
SURPLUS
SURPLUS
SURPLUS
SURPLUS
SURPLUS
SURPLUS
384 POWER BOOK LaPtOP
385 POWER BOOK MONITOR
386 MONITOR
SFC409NOL23L
CY4024Y9132
R335GAKPO
00036
SURPLUS 1
SURPLUS 1
SURPLUS 1
POLICE
387 SAMSUNG MONITOR 283900373
SURPLUS 2
388 TEKTRONICS PRINTER
389 PRINTER
390 PRINTER
391 TOSHIBA PRINTER
J025028
ZA19912
ZA46257
ZA12702
0O183
00618
SURPLUS 1
SURPLUS 2
SURPLUS 2
SURPLUS 1
PAGE 13
¥/
HARDWARE
DESCRIPTION
392 TOSHIBA PRINTER
393 TOSHIBA PRINTER
394 TOSHIBA PRINTER
395 TOSHIBA PRINTER
396 TOSHIBA PRINTER
397 TOSHIBA PRINTER
398 MODEM
399 UPS SYSTEM
400 WANG TERMINAL
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
SURPLUSED HARDWARE
PREPARED BY: INFORMATION SYSTEM DEPT.
SERIAL NUMBER 'F/A # LOC.
ZA13978 00469 SURPLUS 1
ZA43516 SURPLUS 1
ZA46002 SURPLUS 1
ZA46244 SURPLUS 1
ZA46249 00696 SURPLUS 1
ZA46250 SURPLUS 1
66036608 SURPLUS 2
23828 SURPLUS 1
6334 SURPLUS 1
BOX #
11/17/98
COMMENTS
PAGE 14
¥2
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
December 16, 1998
Mayor and Members of the City Council,
Jack Lam, City Manager
Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director
Approval to Appropriate $27~000 From the Data Processing
Replacement Reserve to Fund the Library's LAN Network Project
Recommendation:
Recommend the appropriation in the amount of $27,000 from the data processing replacement
reserve to fund the Library's LAN network project.
Backeround:
Currently, the City's Library is connected to City Hall's wide area network (WAN). The
recommendation is to create the Library's own local area network (LAN). This move will reduce
and minimize the Library's down time, will stabilize the Library's on-site file and print services, up
grade the Library's CD ROM peer to peer network, increase storage and functionality and add a
"new service" for youth which will add four (4) CD ROM terminals to the Library's network to form
a Back to Basics Learning Center on the second floor of the Library.
The Library received $8,000 in State grant funds for this project and those funds will be applied to
the project. The remaining balance is funded through the City's data processing replacement reserve.
This reserve is designed to augment and supplement the funding of computer programs and improve
future technological capabilities for City services. Also, funding through the reserve will allow
existing Library funds to be used for the annual purchase of more books and periodicals for the
Library.
R~llly ~~
Lawrence I. Temple
Administrative Services Director
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY
SUBJECT:
December 16, 1998
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Maria E. Perez, Assistant Engineer
APPROVAL OF PARCEL MAP,
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AND
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I AND STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR PARCEL MAP 15170,
LOCATED ON THF_, EAST SIDE OF HELLMAN NORTH OF WILSON,
SUBMITTED BY HILLSIDE COVE ASSOCIATES, LLC
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND
ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Parcel Map 15170,
accepting the subject agreement and security, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance
District No. I and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2, and authorizing the Mayor and
the City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Parcel Map ! 5170 located on the east side of Heilman Avenue, north of Wilson Avenue in the Very
Low Residential Development District, was approved by the Planning Commission on July 22, 1998
for the division of 2.52 acres into 3 parcels.
The Developer, Hillside Cove Associates, LLC, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee
the construction of the offsite improvements in the following amounts.
Faithful Performance Bond: $55,000.00
Labor and Material Bond: $ 27,500.00
CITY COUNCIl, STAFF REPORT
PARCEL MAP 15170 - HILLSIDE COVE ASSOCIATES, LLC
December 16, 1998
Page 2
Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office.
Letters of approval have been received from the high school and elementary school districts and
Cucamonga County Water District. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation form signed by the
Developer is on file in the City Clerk's office.
Respectfully Submitted,
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO: dlw
Attachments
KESOLUTION NO. ? ~- ~[~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
PARCEL MAP NUMBER 15170, IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY
WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map No. 15170, submitted by Hillside Cove Associates, LLC, and
consisting of 3 parcels located on the east side of Hellman north of Wilson Avenue, being a division
of 2.52 acres was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on July
22, 1998, and is in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and Local Ordinance No. 28
adopted pursuant to that Act; and
WHEREAS, Parcel Map No. 15170 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown
on said Tentative Parcel Map; and
WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by
the City Council of said City have now been met by entry into an Improvement Agreement
guaranteed by acceptable Improvement Security by Hillside Cove Associates, LLC as developer;
and
WHEREAS, said Developer submits for approval said Parcel Map offering for dedication, for
street, highway and related highway purposes, the streets delineated thereon.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security submitted
by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign
said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to
attest; and that the offers for dedication and the final map delineating the same for said Parcel Map
No. 15170 is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County
Recorder to be filed for record.
RESOLUTION NO. q g~- ~ o~ 0
A RESOLUTION OF TI-IE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE
ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I AND STKEET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRiCT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR PARCEL MAP
15170
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously
formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act
of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said
special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. I, Street
Lighting Maintenance District No. 1, and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 (hereinafter
referred to as the "Maintenance District"); and
WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act
of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and
WHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the
property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this referenced to the
Maintenance District; and
WHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the
Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation
without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's "Report".
NOW, THEREFOKE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO C UCAMONGA
HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION i: That the above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the property as
shown in Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto to the
Maintenance District.
SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including the levy of
all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder.
/-/7
EXHIBIT "A"
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2
ORIGINAL
POOR QUALITY
CITY OF
ITEM: Parcel Map 15170
RANCHO CUCAMONGA EXmBrr: "A"
ENGINEERING DIVISION
EXHIBIT "B"
WORK PROGRAM
PROJECT: PARCEL MAP 15170
STREET LIGHTS:
Dist. 5800L
SI ---
S2 4
NUMBER OF LAMPS
9500L 16.000L 22.000L 27.500L
LANDSCAPING:
Dist.
LI
Community
Equestrian
Trail
D.G.S.F.
Turf Non-Turf Trees
S.F. S.F. Ea.
...... 16
* Existing items installed with original project.
ASSESSMENT UNITS:
Assessment Units
By District
Parcel DU S1 S2 L1
1 1 I
Annexation Date: December i 6, 1998
Form Date 11/16/94
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
December 16, 1998
TO:
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager,
FROM:
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY:
Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL OF MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 3 FOR TRACT MAP NUMBER 15766, LOCATED ON
BASE LINE ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 800' WEST OF VICTORIA PARK
LANE, SUBMITTED BY R.C. APARTMENTS L.L.C, A DEVELOPER
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Tract Map Number
15766, accepting the subject agreement and security, ordering the annexation to Landscape
Maintenance District No. 2 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 3, and authorizing
the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Tentative Tract 15766, located on the north side of Base Line Road, approximately 800 feet west of
Victoria Park Lane, in the Victoria Community Development District, was approved by the Planning
Commission on January 8, 1997, for the condominium subdivision of ! lot for 264 units on 22.2
acres of land.
The Developer, R. C. Apartments, L.L.C. is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the
construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts:
Faithful Performance Bond
Labor and Material Bond:
$851,809.00
$425,904.00
Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City C!erk's Office.
Letters of approval have been received from the high school and elementary school districts and
Cucamonga County Water District. C.C. & R.'s have also been approved by the City Attorney. The
Consent and Waiver to Annexation form signed by the Developer is on file in the City Clerk's office.
~esp. ectil ~~ilte~/~7
City Engineer
WJO:DJ:dlw
VICINITY NIAI'
v~ eros,/
TItACT 15766
CITY O1,' RAINClIO CUCAMOIN(;A
COUNTY OF 8AN BEItNARDINO
5'i'A'1'1¢ O1,' CALIFORNIA
RESOLUTION NO. ~>- 6~d/
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY FOR TRACT MAP NO. 15766
WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 15766, submitted by R.C. Apartments, L.L.C., and
consisting of 264 units located on the north side of Base Line Road, approximately 800 feet west of
Victoria Park Lane, being a condominium subdivision of 1 lot for 264 units on 22.2 acres of land
in the Medium Residential District was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, on January 8, 1997, and is in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and Local
Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that Act; and
WHEREAS, Tract Map No. 15766 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown
on said Tentative Tract Map; and
WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by
the City Council of said City have now been met by entry into an Improvement Agreement
guaranteed by acceptable Improvement Security by R. C. Apartment L.L.C. as developer; and
WHEREAS, said Developer submits for approval said Tract Map offering for dedication, for
street, highway and related highway purposes, the streets delineated thereon.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security submitted
by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign
said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to
attest; and that the offers for dedication and the final map delineating the same for said Tract Map
No. 15766 is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County
Recorder to be filed for record.
RESOLUTION NO. ~ ~ -~:;~,fi~fi,
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE
ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 AND STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 3 FOR TRACT MAP
NUMBER 15766
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously
formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act
of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said
special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 2, Street
Lighting Maintenance District No. I and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 (hereinafter
referred to as the "Maintenance District"); and
WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act
of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and
WHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the
property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this referenced to the
Maintenance District; and
WHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the
Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation
v~thout notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's "Report".
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO C UCAMONGA
HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION l: That the above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the property as
shown in Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto to the
Maintenance District.
SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including the levy of
all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder.
EXHIBIT "A*
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7--
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND .5
ORIGINAL
POOR QUALITY ,
~," I~ ","' 'I" 'i" ""'" "'," II'
,.' TnACT 13013
MO 227/15-10
i
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
EXHIBIT "B"
WORK PROGRAM
PROJECT: TRACT MAP NO. 15766
STREET LIGHTS:
Dist. 5800L
S1 9
S3 3
NUMBER OF LAMPS
9500L 16.000L 22,000L 27.500L
LANDSCAPING:
Community
Equestrian
Trail
Dist. D.G.S.F.
L2
Turf Non-Tuff
S.F. S.F.
--- 6510
Trees
Ea.
19
Decorative
Hardscape
SF
7950
* Existing items installed with original project.
ASSESSMENT UNITS:
Assessment Units
By District
DU S 1 S3 L2
264 264 264 264
Annexation Date: City Council Date December 9, 1998
Form Date 11 / 16/94
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY
SUBJECT:
December 16, 1998
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer
APPROVAL OF AN IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR THE INSTALLATION OF A MASTER
PLAN STORM DRAIN SYSTEM RELATING TO TRACT 14534-2,
LOCATED ON VICTORIA PARK LANE, EAST OF ROCHESTER
AVENUE, SUBMITTED B WILLIAM LYON HOMES, INC., A
CALIFORNIA CORPORATION
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the
Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for the installation of a Master Plan
Storm Drain System in Victoria Park Lane from Day Creek Channel easterly to Day Creek
boulevard relating to Tract 14534-2 and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said
agreement.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Tract 14534-2, located on the southeast corner of Victoria Park Lane and Rochester Avenue,
in the Low Medium Residential District, was approved by the City Council on May 21, 1997.
The Developer, William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California Corporation, had submitted an
Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the installation of a Master
Plan Storm Drain System in Victoria Park Lane from Day Creek Channel easterly to Day
Creek Boulevard relating to Tract 14534-2 in the following amount:
Faithful Performance- Irrevocable Letter of Credit $474,073.90
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
TRACT 14534-2 - WILLIAM LYON HOMES, INC.
December 16, 1998
Page 2
The submittal of said Agreement and Security will allow the Developer to extend the original
requirement date of installation prior to January 1999. The anticipating installation will start
by February 1999 and expected to be completed within three months from start of
construction.
Copies of the Agreement and Security are available in the City Clerk's office.
Respectfully Submitted,
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:WV:dlw
Attachments
RESOLUTION
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY FOR THE INSTALLATION OF A MASTER PLAN
STORM DRAIN SYSTEM RELATING TO TRACT 14534-2
WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 14534-2, submitted by William Lyon Homes, Inc.,
a California Corporation, located at the southeast corner of Victoria Park Lane and Rochester
Avenue, was approved by the City Council on May 21, 1997, and is in compliance with the State
Subdivision Map Act and Local Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that Act; and
WHEREAS, the Developer, William Lyon Homes, submits for approval an Improvement
Agreement guaranteed by acceptable Improvement Security for the installation of a Master Plan
Storm Drain System in Victoria Park Lane from Day Creek Channel easterly to Day Creek
Boulevard.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
HEREBY RESOLVES, as follows:
That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor is
authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to
attest thereto; and
That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient, subject to
approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney.
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ENGINEERING DIVISION
N
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
STAFF REI'ORT
December 16. 1998
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack l,am, AICI'. ('it,',' Manager
ORIGINAL
%Villiam J. ()'Nell, City Engineer POOR QUALITY
Michael D. Long, Supervising Public Works Inspector/~,/~
RI;JECT ALl. IllDS I:OR TIlE RANClIO CIJC,;\NI()N(i..\ CIVIC CENTI:.R
CANOPY ADI)ITION PROJECT BI',.CAIE,;t! '1'111,'. BIDS SIIII.'qTANTI.,\I.I.Y
EXCEED TItE F]NGINt.~ER'S ESTIMATI~
!,IECOMM ENI)ATION:
It is rcctm'm~.cndcd that the City Cot,nell reject all bids lbr the Rancho Cucamcmga Civic Center
Canopy Addition lh-ojcct because the bids substantially exceed the I')~ginccr's estimate
BACI~.(; R() UN I)/ANA !,Y,%IS:
l'cr previous Council action. bids wcrc solicited, received and opened on l)cccmhcr 8, 1998, lbr the
subject project. [Jnity Construction is the apparent 1oxvcst bidder, with a bid [1111Ol. 111t ol $68, )(~8.0().
The I:ng~nccr s estimate was $_7,800.00.
Respect t'ully sublllittcd.
William .I. O'Neil
City Engineer
W,IO:MI)I,:Is
DATE:
December 16, 1998
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
TO:
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM:
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY:
Monte Prescher, Public Works Engineer (.~
Laura J. Bonaccorsi, Associate Park PlanheretiC/
SUBJECT:
AWARD AND AUTHORIZATION FOR EXECUTION OF CONTRACT FOR THE FOR
THE CONSTRUCTION OF LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION FOR THE HAVEN
AVE BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT BETWEEN BASE LINE ROAD AND CHURCH
STREET, TO BE FUNDED FROM BEAUTIFICATION FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO. 21-
4647-9709.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council award and authorize for execution the contract for the Haven Avenue
Bcautification Project between Base Line Road and Church Street, to Golden Bear Arborists,
Incorporated, to be funded from Beautification Funds, Account No. 21-4647-9709.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on December 8, 1998, for the subject
project. Golden Bear Arborists, Incorporated, is the apparent lowest bidder, with a bid amount of
$177,821.40 (see attached bid summary). The Engineer's estimate was $185,000.00. Staff has reviewed
all bids received and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements. Staff has
completed the required background investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid
documents.
Respectfully submitted,
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:MDL:Is
Attachment
Bid Summary for
Landscaping of the west side of Haven Avenue between Church Street and Base Line Road
B~ds opened on Tuesday, December 8, 1998 ~ 2:00 PM
Golden Bear Arborists
Unit
Item Description Qty Unit Price Price
I Clearing & Grubbing I LS 52,800.00 $2,800.00
2 Unclassfied Excavation 490 CY $25,50 $12,495.00
3 Install 4" / 5" Pots 4792 EA $I 70 $8. 146.40
4 Automahc Imgation 1 LS $66,250.00 $66,250.00
5 Mulch 475 CY $21.00 $9,975.00
6 Soils Preparation/Fine Grading 38410 SF $0.12 $4,609 20
7 Maintenance Period ! 20 Days $33.50 $4,020.00
8 1 Gallon Shrub I 172 EA $4.75 $5,567,00
9 5 Gallon Shrub 862 EA $17.00 $14,654.00
10 15 Gallon Tree 80 EA $75.00 $6,000.00
11 PCC Mow Strip 2830 LF $12.00 $33,96000
12 Boulders - 24" 126 EA $30.00 $3,780.00
13 Boulders - 36" G0 EA $6300 $3,78Q00
14 Trash Receptacle 2 EA $892.40 $1,784 80
TOTAL AMOUNT BID $177,821.40
Nature Tech LandscapJng
Unit
Price Price
$ I 00 $1.00
$26.00 $12,740.00
$100 $4.792.00
$100.64800 $100,648 00
$20.00 $9,500.00
$0.10 $3,841.00
$2500 $3,000.00
$5 00 $5,86Q00
$12.00 $10.344.00
$7500 $6,00Q~JO
$6.00 $16,98000
$4500 $5.670 DO
$7000 $4,200 (~0
$500.00 $1,000 o0
$184,576.00
S & M Landscape
Unit
Item Description Qty Unit Price Price
1 Clearing & Grubbing 1 LS St,000.00 $1.000.00
2 Unclassfied Excavation 490 CY $50.00 $24,500 00
3 Install 4" / 5" Pots 4792 EA $3.00 $14.376.00
4 Automatic Irrigation 1 LS $76,537.00 $76,537.00
5 Mulch 475 CY $30.00 $14.25000
6 Soils Preparation/Free Grading 38410 SF $0.30 $11,523,00
7 Maintenance Period 120 Days $27.00 $3,240.00
8 I Gallon Shrub 1172 EA $5 00 $5.860 00
9 5 Gallon Shrub 862 EA $13.00 $1 t,20G 00
I0 15 Gallon Tree 80 EA $150.00 $12,000 00
11 P C C. Mow Str~p 2830 LF $700 $19,810 00
12 Boulders - 24" 120 EA $25.00 $3,150 O0
13 Boulders - 36" 60 EA $50.00 $3.000 00
14 Trash Receptacle 2 EA $700.00 $1,400 00
TOTAL AMOUNT BID $201,852.00
Mariposa Horticultural
Unit
Price Price
$2,624.00 $2,624,00
$60.61 $29,698.90
$204 $9.77568
$93,100.00 $93,100.00
$31 00 $14,725.00
$0.27 $10,370.70
$6 25 $75000
$8 00 $9.376.00
$t9 00 $16,378.00
$80 00 $6.400.00
$9 68 $27,394,40
S3787 $4.77162
$40 00 $2,40000
$67500 $1,35000
$229,114.30
DATE:
TO:
CITY ()l" RANCII() C[:CAM(
STAFF REPORT
December 16, 1998
Mayor and Members o1' the City Council
Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager
FR. OM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
William J. O'Neil, City Enginccr
Michael D. Long, Supervising Public Works lnspcctor/2'~/-f'~
ACCEPT THE SENIOR CENTER PARKING LOT EXPANSION PROJECT,
CONTRACT No. 98-008, AS COMPLETE, REkI:ASE THE BONDS AND
AUTHORIZE Tt[E CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION
AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $157,761.95
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that City Council accept the Senior Center Parking Lot Expansion Project,
Contract No. 98-008, as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion, and
r~tain the Faithful Performance in the anlount of$154,226.75 to bc used as the Maintenance Bond
and authorize the release of{he Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of$154,226.75, six months
after the recordation of said Notice if no claims have bccn received. Also, authorixc the release of
the retention in the amount o1'$15,776.19, thirty-live days after the apprt)val of the final contract
amount ors i 57,761.95.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
The subject project has been complctcd in accordance with the appmvcd plans and specifications
and to the satisthction of the City Engineer. The final contract amount, based on project
documentation, is $157,761.95, which includes onc contract changc order in the amount of
$2,300.00 for the removal and replacement o foyer-saturated subgrade under a proposed block wall..
The original amount approved by Council was $169,64{).42
City Engineer
WJO:MDL:Is
Attachment
J
No. ox 0t
A RESOLUTION OFTlIE CITY COUNCIL OFTfIE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCF~P'FING THE PUBLIC
IMI~'ROVEMENTS FOR TI-tE SENIOR CENTER PARKING LOT
EX PANS ION I'ROJ ECT, CONTRACT NO. 98-008 AN D AUTHORIZING
THE FILING ()F A NOTICE OF' COMH.,ETION FOR'FIIE WORK
WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements tbr the Senior Center Parking Lot
Expansion Project, Contract No. 98-008 has bccn completed to the satislhction of the City Engineer;
and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filccl, ccrti13, ing the work complete.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City' of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a
Notice of Completion with the Courtty R. ecorder o£ San Bernardino County.
DATE:
TO:
CI'I'Y ()F RANCII() ('1
STAFF REPOI/T
December 16, 1998
Mayor and Members of the City Council
.Jack Lain, AICP. City Manager
FROM:
BY:
William J. O'Neil. City Engineer
Michael D. Long. Supervising Pt, blic Works Inspector f~'04-"
SUBJECT:
ACCEPT THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL LIGHTING AT TIIE INTERSECTION OF
ARROW ROUTE AND RED OAK AVENUE, CONTICACT NO. 98-022, AS
COMPLETE, RELEASE 'FILE BONDS AND AUTIIORIZE THE CITY
ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPI. ETION AND APPROVE THE
FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $119373.00
lIECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that tile City Cotmcil accept tile Traffic Signal and Satiety Lighting at tile
intersection of Arrow Route and Red Oak Avcnt,e. Contract No. 98-022. as complete. authorize the
City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion. and retain the Faithlid Perlbrmancc in tile amot, nt of
$.108.585.00 to bc used as the Maintenance Bond and at, thorizc the release of the Labor and
Materials Bond in tile arnou,~t o1'$108.585.00 six months after the rccordati{m of said Notice if no
claims have been received. Also. authorize the release of the retention in the amount of $5,968.65.
thirty-five days nficr the approval of tile 1inal contract amount ofS119.373.00
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
The subject project has been complctcd in accordancc with the approved plans and specifications
and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The 1inal coutract amount. based on pro. jcct
documentation, is $119.373.00. which includes three contract change orders in tile amot, nt of
$ I 0.788.00 tbr the constrt,ction oFa signal ir~tercomleCt with the White Oak/Arrow signal. mast arm
brackets and the reconstruction of a handicap ramp. The original wnount approvcd by Cottaell was
$I 19.373.00.
City Engineer
W.IO:MDL:Is
Attachrncnt
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL LIGHTING AT THE
INTERSECTION OF ARROW ROUTE AND RED OAK AVENUE,
CONTRACT NO. 98-022 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A
NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for the Traffic Signal Lighting at
the Intersection o fArrow Route and Red Oak Avenue, Contract No. 98-022 has been completed to
the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a
Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
December 16, 1998
TO:
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager
FROM:
BY:
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Michael D. Long, Supervising Public Works Inspector?'?'~_
SUBJECT:
ACCEPT THE TAPIA VIA STREET IMPROVEMENTS, FROM GROVE
AVENUE TO RANCHERIA STREET, CONTRACT NO. 98-012, AS COMPLETE,
RELEASE THE BONDS AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A
NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT
AMOUNT OF $195,194.41
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that City Council accept the Tapia Via street improvements, from Grove Avenue
to Rancheria Street, Contract No. 98-012, as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice
o'f Completion, and retain the Faithful Performance in the amount of $178,100.00 to be used as the
Maintenance Bond and authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of
$178,100.00 six months after the recordation ofsaid Notice if no claims have been received. Also,
authorize the release of the retention in the amount ors 19,519.44, thirty-five days after the approval
of the final contract amount of $195,194.41.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications
and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The final contract amount, based on project
documentation, is $195,194.41, which includes one contract change order in the amount of
$10,482.91 for the reconstruction of sewer manholes and right-of-way delay by the Gas Company.
The original amount approved by Council was $196,750.00.
Respectfully submitted,
Wi 11~J. O~Nei~lc/~7
City Engineer
WJO:MDL:Is
Attachment
sot vto ??-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR TAPIA VIA STREET IMPROVEMENTS, FROM
GROVE AVENUE TO RANCHERIA STREET, CONTRACT NO. 98-012
AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION
FOR THE WORK
WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for the Tapia Via Street
Improvements, from Grove Avenue to Rancheria Street, Contract No. 98-012, has been completed
to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a
Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County.
DATE:
'1'():
I?ROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
December 16. 1998
Cit'V ()l: R,.\NCI l() ('1 '('.\TXl()Nt
STAFF REPORT
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Litill. AICI'. City Manager
William J. ()'Ncil. City Engineer
Micllacl D. Long. St, pervising Public
ORIGINAL
wl?,, sg, R QUALITY
nspector
ACCEPT THE SPRUCE PARK SKATE PARK. CONTRACT NO. 98-032, AS
COMPLETE. RELEASE TIlE BONDS AND AUTIIORIZE TIlE CITY
ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COblI'I.FJI'ION AND AI'i'ROVE TIlE
FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $120,079.80
RECOMMENI)ATION:
14. is recommended that City Council accopt the Spruce Park Skate l'ark. Contract No. 984)32. as
complete. authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion. and retain the Faithlhl
Pcrlbrmancc in the amount o f S112.957.00 to bc used as the Maintenance llond and authorize the
release of the I.abor and Materials l)ond in the amount of 5112.957.00. six months after the
recordation of said Notice if no claims have bccn received. Also. authorize the release of the
retention in the amount orS12.079.80. thirty-five clays after the approval of the fired contract amount
of $120.079.80.
BACKGROUN!)/ANALYSIS:
'File subject project has been completed in accordancc with tile approved plans and spccilicatio,ls
and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Tile final contract amount. based on project
documcr~tation. is $120.079.80. which includes contract change order in thc amount of $7,040.00
for the nlodification of the pyramid and the addition of drainage lines. The original anlount approved
by Cotmcil was $124.253.00.
R 71s ~,t.~)' submittcd. -
Ncil
City Engineer
W.IO:MDL:Is
Attachment
RECORDING REQUESTED BY:
CITY OF RANClIO CUCAMONGA
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, Calilbrnia 91729
WHEN RECORDED lVIAII, TO:
CITY CLERK
CITY OF IL~NCHO CUCAMONGA
P.O. Box 807
Rancho (._'ucalllOllg;.I, Calitbrnia 91729
NOTICt'~ OF COMI'I,E'I'I()N
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN TIIAT:
1. The undersigned is an owner of an interest or estate in the hcrcinalicr described rcal
property, the nature of which interest or estate is:
All public rights-olLway- within the boundaries of CO 984132
2. The lidl name and address of' the undersigned oxvncr is: CITY ()F RANClIO
CUCAMONGA, 10500 Civic Center l)rivc, P.O. Box 807, Rancho ('tlCalllOllga Calitbrnia 91729.
3. ()n the 16'h day of[)cccmbcr, 1998, there was completed on the hcrcinalicrdcscribcd
real property the work of improvement set lbrth in the contract documents lbr:
Spruce l'ark Skate l'ark
4. The name of the original contractor tbr the work of improvement as a whole was:
Nature Tcch Landscaping
5. The real property relkrred to herein is situated in the City of Rancho Cucanlonga,
County of San Bernardino, Calilbmia, and is described as tbllows:
Spruce ['ark Skate Park
CITY ()F RANCII() CI~('AM()NGA, a
Municipal Corpt)ration. ( )kx'llcr
William.l. ()Nell ~
C. ity Engineer
7O
A RF~SOI,t.ITION OF TI IE CITY COt IN(_'II. ()1:'1'1 I1.i ('ITY
()F RANCII() CUCANION(iA, CAI.IF()RNIA.
ACCt';I'TIN(i TIll:, I'[JI/1,1C IMI'IU)VI':MI';N'I'S I:()R TI I1';
SI'R. UCt! I'ARK SKA'I'Ii PARK, C()NTI~.A£"I'
ANI) AI~TII()RIZIN(i Till! FII,IN(i ()1: A N()'I'ICE ()1:
COMI'I.t.;'I'I(IN I:()R. TI IF, WORK
WI I!7. REAS, the construction of public improvoncnts for the Spruce I'ark Skate Park,
Contract No. 98-032 has been completed to the satisfaction of the ('it,.' I!nginccr: and
WI IEREAS. a Notice ol'Coml~lction is required tt)bc 1~ led. ccrti I}.'ing the work complete.
NOW, TtlEI,'.EFOI~.IL the ('it>' C. ouncil of the ('it',' of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
resolves, that the work is hcrcbx aCCCl')tcd and the ('it.',' l:~nginccr is authorized it) sign and lilt a
Notice of Completion with the County [?,ccordcr of Sail l)crmtrdino Countx.'.
7/
DATE:
'1'():
FRO M:
BY:
SUBJECT:
CI'['V ()F R:\NCII()
STAFF REPORT
December 16. 1998
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lain, ,,\ICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
l~inda R. Beck, .It'. Engineer
ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFIlL PERFORMANCE
BOND, AND FII...F: A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMI'ROVEMENTS FOR
PARCEL ;'VIAl' 15074. LOCATED ON THE NOR. T[ I SIDE OF LA VINE STRF. ET
230 FEET EAST ()F HELLMAN AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY MR. DENNING M.
PERDEW, EXECUTOR FOR TIlE ESTATE OF JOIIN L PERDEW
RECOM MEN DATION:
'['bc required improvements Ibr l'arcel Map 15074, have been completed in an acceptable manner,
m~d it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements. authorize the City Engineer
to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithfid Pcrlbrnmncc
Bond.
IIACKG!I. OUND/ANA!~YSIS:
As a condition of approval of completion of Parcel Map 15074, on the north side ofl,a Vine Street.
230 l;,:¢t cast of [Iclhnan Avenue. the applicant was required to complete street improvements. It
is recommended that City Council release the existing Faithful Pcrlbrmancc [~,ond.
Developer: Mr. Denning M.. Perdew, Executor fbr the Estate of John L. Perdew
2595 Montgomery Avenue
Cardiff by the Sea. CA 92007
Release: Faithful Pcrlbrmance Bond: Investment CD $8,000.00
Respectfully submitted,
William J. ()'Ncil
City l:,nginccr
W.I():I,RB:Is
A RI.~SO[.UTION OF THE CITY ()F R:\NCIIO
CUCAMONGA, CAI,IFORNIA, ACCEP'I'IN(; 'l'llli
PUB[,IC IN'lI'R()VIiMIiNTS [:OR PAI~.(?l![~ MAP 15074,
AND AtJTII()RIZIN(i TIlE FILING OF A N()TI('I'; ()F
COMI'I,Ii'I'I()N FOR Tt IF, WORK
WHER. I!AS. the construction of public improvements lbr Parcel Map 15074
have bccn completed to the satisthction of the City Engineer: and
WHEREAS. a Notice of Completion is rcqt, ircd to bc filed. ccrtitying the
work complete.
NOW TH I~RI".FORE. be it resolvcd. that the work is hereby acccptcd and the
City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice oi' Completion with the Cot, nty
Recorder of San Bernardino County.
73
ORDINANCE NO. 592
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA
COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 98-03, A REQUEST TO
CHANGE THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN LAND USE MAP
FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER
ACRE) AND COMMUNITY FACILITY TO LOW-MEDIUM
RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 17
ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BASE
LINE ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 1,300 FEET EAST OF THE
INTERSECTION OF ROCHESTER AVENUE, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF APN: 0227-091-18
THROUGH 21.
A. RECITALS.
1. The Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency filed an application forVictoria
Community Plan Amendment No. 98-03 as described in the title of this Ordinance.
Hereinafter in this Ordinance, the subject Victoria Community Plan Amendment is
referred to as "the application."
2. On October 28, and continued to November 10, 1998, the Planning Commission
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the
application.
3. On November 10, 1998, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga recommended approval of the associated General Plan Amendment
No. 98-04 to change the General Plan Land Use Map from Medium Residential (8-
14 dwelling units per acre) and Civic/Community to Low-Medium Residential (4-8
dwelling units per acre).
4. On November 10, 1998, the Planning Commission recommended approval of
the application to the City Council.
5. On December 2, 1998, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
approved associated General Plan Amendment No. 98-04 to change the General
Plan Land Use Map from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and
Civic/Community to Low -Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre).
6. On December 2, 1998, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
7. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.
Ordinance 592
Page 2
B. ORDINANCE.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and ordained by the City
Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the
above-referenced public hearing, including written and oral staff reports, together
with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to four parcels of land totaling
approximately 17 acres, basically a rectilinear configuration, located
on the north side of Base Line Road, approximately 1,300 feet east
of the intersection of Rochester Avenue and which is presently
vacant. Said properties are currently designated as Medium
Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and Community Facility;
and
b. All of the surrounding properties are within the Victoria Planned
Community. The property to the north of the subject site is
designated Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre)
and is vacant with an unused railroad right-of-way. The property to
the west is designated Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per
acre) and is developed with a fire station. The property to the east
is designated Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre)
and is vacant and partially developed with a public storage facility.
The property to the south, on the south side of Base Line Road, is
designated Regionally Related Commercial and is vacant; and
c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of
the General Plan and will provide for development within the district
in a manner consistent with the General Plan, the Victoria
Community Plan, and with related development; and
d. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the
General Plan Land Use Element and the Victoria Community Plan;
and
e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental
to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on
the environment nor the surrounding properties.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the
above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in
paragraphs I and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows:
Ordinance 592
Page 3
a. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the
proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with
existing land uses in the surrounding area; and
b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant
impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and
¢. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the
General Plan.
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative
Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental
assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial
evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and
adopts a Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows:
a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance
with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended,
and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said
Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect
the independent judgment of the City Council; and, further, this
Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in
said Negative Declaration with regard to the application.
b. That, based upon the changes and alterations which have been
incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse
environmental effects will occur.
c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the
California Code of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In
considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative
Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed
project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife
resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further,
based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative
Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information
provided to the City Council during the public hearing, the City
Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth
in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of
Regulations.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4
above, this Council hereby approves Victoria Community Plan Amendment No. 98-
03 to change the Land Use Map for the subject properties to Low-Medium
Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), as shown on the attached Exhibit "A."
6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance.
Ordinance 592
Page 4
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 16th day of December, 1998.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
AB STAIN E D:
ATTEST:
William J. Alexander, Mayor
Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk
I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the Council
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 2nd day of December, 1998, and was finally passed
at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 16th day of
December, 1998.
Executed this 17th day of December, 1998, at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk
?7
ORDINANCE NO. 593
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA
COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 98-04, A REQUEST TO CHANGE
THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM
MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO
LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE)
FOR 6 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF
BASE LINE ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 1,100 FEET EAST OF THE
INTERSECTION OF ROCHESTER AVENUE AND FOR 21/2 ACRES
OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD,
APPROXIMATELY 2,000 FEET EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF
ROCHESTER AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF - APN: 0227-091-22, 25, AND 43
A. RECITALS.
1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has authorized the filing
of an application for Victoria Community Plan Amendment No. 98-04 as described
in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Victoria
Community Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application."
2. On November 10, 1998, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga recommended approval of the associated General Plan Amendment
No. 98-05 to change the General Plan Land Use Map from Medium Residential (8-
14 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre)
for the properties 1,100 feet east of Rochester Avenue.
3. On November 10, 1998, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and
recommended approval of the application to the City Council.
4. On December 2, 1998 the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
approved the associated General Plan Amendment No. 98-05 to change the
General Plan Land Use Map from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre)
to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for the properties 1,100 feet
east of Rochester Avenue.
5. On December 2, 1998, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
6. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.
Ordinance 593
Page 2
B. ORDINANCE.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and ordained by the City
Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the
above-referenced public hearing on December 2, 1998, including written and oral
staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as
follows:
a. The application applies to two parcels of land totaling
approximately 6 acres and one 2½ acre parcel, all of which are
basically rectilinear in configuration. The first two parcels (6 acres)
are located on the north side of Base Line Road, approximately
1,100 feet east of the intersection of Rochester Avenue and are
presently developed with a fire station and the third parcel (2½
acres) is located on the north side of Base Line Road, approximately
2,000 feet east of the intersection of Rochester Avenue and is
vacant. Said properties are currently designated as Medium
Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre); and
b. All of the surrounding properties are within the Victoria Planned
Community. For the parcel 1,100 feet east of Rochester Avenue,
the properties to the north are designated Low-Medium Residential
(4-8 dwelling units per acre) and are vacant with an unused railroad
right-of-way. The property to the west is designated Utility Corridor
and is developed with electrical transmission lines and flood control
channels. The property to the east is designated Medium
Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and is vacant. The
property to the south, on the south side of Base Line Road, is
designated Regionally Related Commercial and is vacant. For the
parcel 2,000 feet east of Rochester Avenue, the properties to the
north are designated Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per
acre) and are vacant with an unused railroad right-of-way. The
property to the west is currently designated Medium Residential (8-
14 dwelling units per acre) and is being changed to Low-Medium
Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) with the approval of Victoria
Community Plan Amendment 98-03 and is vacant. The property to
the east is designated Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per
acre) and is vacant. The property to the south, on the south side of
Base Line Road, is designated Regionally Related Commercial and
is vacant; and
Ordinance 593
Page 3
c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of
the General Plan and will provide for development within the district
in a manner consistent with the General Plan, the Victoria
Community Plan, and with related development; and
d. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the
General Plan Land Use Element and the Victoria Community Plan;
and
e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental
to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on
the environment nor the surrounding properties.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the
above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in
paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. That the subject properties are suitable for the uses permitted in
the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with
existing land uses in the surrounding area by a General Plan Master
Plan designation with adjacent properties; and
b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant
impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and
¢. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the
General Plan.
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative
Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental
assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial
evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and
adopts a Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows:
a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance
with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended,
and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said
Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect
the independent judgment of the City Council; and, further, this
Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in
said Negative Declaration with regard to the application.
b. That, based upon the changes and alterations which have been
incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse
environmental effects will occur.
c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the
California Code of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In
considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative
Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed
project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife
Ordinance 593
Page 4
resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further,
based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative
Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information
provided to the City Council during the public hearing, the City
Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth
in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of
Regulations.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4
above, this Council hereby approves Victoria Community Plan Amendment No. 98-
04 to change the Land Use Map for the subject properties to Low-Medium
Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) as shown on the attached Exhibit "A."
6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 16th day of December, 1998.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
AB STAIN E D:
ATTEST:
William J. Alexander, Mayor
Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk
I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the Council
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 2nd day of December, 1998, and was finally passed
at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 16th day of
December, 1998.
Executed this 17th day of December, 1998, at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk
¢/
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
December 16, 1998
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
Brad Buller, City Planner
Dan Coleman, Principal Planner
CONSIDERATION OF CODE AMENDMENTS REGARDING GRADING REVIEW
AND TIME EXTENSIONS
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission recommends approval.
BACKGROUNDIANALYSlS
The City of Rancho Cucamonga takes various actions in the review of development applications.
The activities include subdivision review, review of grading plans, design review, issuance of
permits, and the granting of time extensions for project approvals. Under the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, these actions are divided into two categories:
ministerial and discretionary. CEQA environmental review requirements apply to discretionary
projects approved by the City (e.g., approval of subdivision map), but do not apply to ministerial
projects (e.g., issuance of a building permit). The purpose of these amendments is to bring City
codes into compliance with State law and to clarify that certain actions are ministerial activities.
These amendments were brought before the Planning Commission in July 1998 and the attached
Planning Commission staff report describes the proposed changes in detail. The Planning
Commission adopted resolutions recommending approval of the proposed ordinances.
SUBDIVISIONS
The State Subdivision Map Act allows for an initial approval period for subdivisions of up to three
years, plus up to five years of extensions, for a total of eight years before the final map must be
recorded. The City's Subdivision Ordinance is more restrictive and provides for a initial two-year
approval, subject to up to three years of extensions, for a maximum life of five years. During
California's recession in the first half of the 1990s, the state legislature granted three years of
automatic time extensions, above and beyond whatever time extensions cities may grant. For those
projects which received such an automatic time extension from the state, the maximum life is eight
years (five years of City approvals with extensions, plus three years of state extensions) under our
current regulations.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS - CITY OF R.C.
December 16, 1998
Page 2
One such project, Tentative Tract 14875, has exhausted all possible time extensions and will expire
on January 9, 1999. The applicant has not submitted for plan check; hence, cannot record their final
map before it expires. The applicant has requested that the City consider amending our regulations
to allow time periods up to eight years, which is the maximum time period authorized by state law.
This request was brought to the Planning Commission on Wednesday, December 9, and it was the
consensus of the Commission that the maximum time limit should remain at five years, as
previously recommended by the Commission. The Commission was concerned that if an eight
year time period were approved, coupled with the three years of automatic time extensions by the
state, this would extend the maximum time period to eleven years for not only Tract 14875 but
possibly others. They felt eleven years was too long.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
The proposed amendments are not a "project;" hence, are exempt from environmental review
pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15061.
CORRESPONDENCE
This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper. No
correspondence has been received regarding this item.
Respectfully submitted,
Brad Buller
City Planner
BB:DC/jfs
Attachments:
Exhibit "A" - Planning Commission Staff Report dated July 22, 1998
Exhibit "B" - Planning Commission Minutes dated July 22, 1998
Ordinance Approving Amendment to the Grading Ordinance
Ordinance Approving Amendment to the Subdivision Ordinance
Ordinance Approving Development Code Amendment 98-01
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
July 22, 1998
Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
Brad Buller, City Planner
Dan Coleman, Principal Planner
CONSIDERATION OF CODE AMENDMENTS REGARDING GRADING REVIEW
AND TIME EXTENSIONS
BACKGROUND: The City of Rancho Cucamonga takes various actions in the review of
development applications. The activities include subdivision review, review of grading plans, design
review, issuance of permits, and the granting of time extensions for project approvals. Under the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, these actions are divided into two
categories: ministerial and discretionary. CEQA environmental review requirements apply to
discretionary projects approved by the City (e.g., approval of subdivision map), but do not apply to
ministerial projects (e.g., issuance of a building permit).
The purpose of these amendments is to clarify that certain actions are ministerial activities.
ANALYSIS:
Grading Ordinance: California courts in certain jurisdictions have reasoned that issuance
of grading permits can be considered discretionary approval subject to CEQA. The current
language in our Grading Ordinance could be interpreted that review of grading plans and
issuance of grading permits was a discretionary act which triggers CEQA review at the
grading stage because it allows for discretion to apply conditions. Obviously, this was not
the intent when the Grading Ordinance was adopted. The attached amendment to the
Grading Ordinance clarifies the intent that a normal grading application and the issuance
of a grading permit does not involve discretion on the part of the City. The exception to this
is the Hillside Grading Ordinance. There, the general grading guidelines and specific type
of grading which will occur must be considered discretionary.
Subdivision Map Extensions: Case law does not answer the question of whether there is
due process right or fundamental property right in a person near a project to receive notice
and the opportunity to be heard at a hearing for an extension of Subdivision Maps. The Map
Act does not specify a hearing for extensions of Tentative Maps. The City Attorney has
advised staff that a public hearing process should be required for a time extension. The
City's Subdivision Ordinance currently gives the City Planner authority to grant time
extensions of Tentative Maps. Currently, Tentative Maps are approved for an initial two-
year period, subject to extensions in 12-month increments upon request. of the applicant.
To be consistent with the Map Act, it is recommended that the Subdivision Ordinance be
amended to provide for a three-year approval period with time extensions up to two years
consistent with the Map Act.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
GRADING REVIEW & TIME EXTENSIONS
July 22, 1998
Page 2
Conditional Use Permits, Development Reviews, Variances and Minor Exceptions:
Currently, the City grants approval for two years. Extensions may be granted by the city
Planner, without a public hearing, in 12-month increments for up to five years from the
original approval date. It is recommended that the Development Code be amended to
provide for a five-year approval period without time extensions.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: The proposed amendments are exempt from environmental
review pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15061(b)(3).
CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily
Bulletin newspaper.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of
the Grading Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance, and Development Code Amendment.
Respectfully submitted,
Brad Buller
City Planner
BB:DC:Is
Attachments: Resolution Recommending Approval of Grading Ordinance Amendment
Resolution Recomending Approval of Subdivision Ordinance Amendment
Resolution Recommending Approval of Development Code Amendment
PUBLIC HEARINGS
B. CONSIDERATION OF CODE AMENDMENTS REGARDING GRADING REVIEW AND TIME
EXTENSIONS - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Dan Coleman, Principal Planner, presented the staff report.
Chairman Barker opened the public hearing. There was no testimony and Chairman Barker
closed the hearing.
Commissioner McNiel asked if the purpose of the amendment was to bring the Code into
compliance with State law.
Mr. Coleman confirmed that was correct.
Motion: Moved by Bethel, seconded by McNiel, to adopt the resolution recommending approval
of Code Amendments regarding grading review and time extensions. Motion carried by the
following vote:
AYES: BARKER, BETHEL, MACIAS, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE - carried
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 15926 o CARNEY - A
residential subdivision of 5 single family lots on 1.33 acres of land in the Low Residential
District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located on the southwest corner of Hellman Avenue and
Pepperidge_ Lane - APN: 202-041-67.
Cecilia Gallardo, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report.
Chairman Barker opened the public hearing.
Michael Ross, 6850 Pepperidge Court, Rancho Cucamonga, stated that he owns the property
adjacent to. Lot 1. He expressed concern that the design be in keeping with the rest of the houses
in the area. He questioned the height of the wall adjacent to his property and the size of the
houses in relation to the existing homes.
Dan Coleman, Principal Planner, that the average lot size is 11,380 square feet. He said the
houses will be developed on an individual basis and should be consistent with the surrounding
houses.
Chairman Barker stated that the houses will be reviewed by either staff or the Planning
Commission.
Brad Buller, City Planner, indicated that staff would review the plans if they are submitted
individually. He stated that it is asked that the houses be compatible with the neighborhood but
that is a very subjective matter.
Planning Commission Minutes
-2- July 22, 1998
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 15, CHAPTER 15.12 OF
THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING REVIEW
OF GRADING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
A. Recitals.
1. On June 10, and continued to July 22, 1998, the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly-noticed public hearing with respect to the above-referenced
Municipal Code Amendment and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted its Resolution No.
98-44, recommending that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt said
amendment.
2. On December 16, 1998, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted
and concluded a duly-noticed public hearing concerning the subject amendment to the Municipal
Code.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.
Ordinance.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: The City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in Recitals,
Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct.
SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that the subject amendment
identified in this Ordinance is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality
Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section
15061(b)(3) of Chapter 3 of Division 6 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.
SECTION 3: Section 15.12.220 Appendix Section 7006 -- Plans and specifications
subsections (d) and (e) are hereby amended to read, in words and figures, as follows:
(d) Soils Engineering Report. The soils engineering report required by
subsection (c) shall include data regarding the nature, distribution and
strength of existing soils, conclusions and recommendations for grading
procedures and design criteria for corrective measures including buttress
fills, when necessary, and opinions and recommendations covering
adequacy for the intended use of sites to be developed by the proposed
grading as affected by soils engineering factors, including the stability of
slopes. Recommendations included in the soils engineering report ~
approvod by thc building official shall be incorporated into the grading plan
or specifications.
(e) Engineering Geology Report. The engineering geology report required
by Subsection (a) shall include an adequate description of the geology of the
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
GRADING ORD. AMEND. o CITY OF R.C.
December 16, 1998
Page 2
site, conclusions and recommendations regarding the effect of geologic
conditions on the proposed development, and opinions and
recommendations covering the adequacy for the intended use of sites to be
developed by the proposed grading as affected by geological factors.
Recommendations included in the report and approvcd by thc building
of"fieiel shall be incorporated in the grading plans or specifications.
SECTION 4: Section 15.12.250 Appendix Section 7010 amended -- Fills subsections (a) and
(e) are hereby amended to read, in words and figures, as follows:
Section 7010 (a) Fills. Unless otherwise recommended in the approved
soils engineering report and approved by thc building official, fills shall
conform to the provisions of this Section and to Figure A, Typical Lot Cross-
section for Fills.
EXCEPTION: The provisions of this section may be waived by the Building
Official for minor fills not intended to support structures.
(e) Compaction. All fills, including backfill in utility trenches, shall be
compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of maximum density.
EXCEPTIONS:
1. Fills exempted elsewhere in this ordinance and where the building
official determines that compaction is not a necessary safety measure
to aid in preventing saturation, settlement, slipping, or erosion of the fill.
2. Where lower density and expansive types of soil exist, permission
for lesser compaction may be granted by the building official upon
showing of good cause under the conditions provided herein.
3. Alternate methods of filling and compaction may be utilized on utility
trenches or other specific projects when recommended by the soils
engineer and approved by thc building official.
SECTION 5: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Ordinance
is, for any reason, deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of
competent jurisdiction, or preempted by legislative enactment, such decision or legislation shall not
affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section,
subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more
sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or words might subsequently be declared
invalid or unconstitutional or preempted by subsequent legislation.
SECTION 6: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the
same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily
Bulletin a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated
in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
ORDINANCE NO. ~'/-?,_D~'
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 16 OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING THE EXTENSION OF
SUBDIVISION MAPS.
A. Recitals.
1. On June 10, and continued to July 22, 1998, the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted duly-noticed public hearings with respect to the above-referenced
Municipal Code Amendment and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted its Resolution
No. 98-45, recommending that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt said
amendment.
2. On December 16, 1998, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted
and concluded a duly-noticed public hearing concerning the subject amendment to the Municipal
Code.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.
B. Ordinance.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in Recitals,
Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct.
SECTION 2: This Council hereby finds and determines that the subject amendment identified
in this Ordinance is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of
1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15061 (b)(3)
of Chapter 3 of Division 6 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.
SECTION 3: Section 16.16.160.A. is hereby is amended to read, in words and figures, as
follows:
16.16.160 Expiration. A. The approval or conditional approval of a
tentative subdivision map shall expire three years twcnty four months from
the date of the adoption of the resolution by the planning commission
approving or conditionally approving the map. An extension to the expiration
date may be approved as provided in Section 16.16.17(X-B,).
SECTION 4: Section 16.16.170 is hereby amended to read in words and figures, as follows:
16.16.170 Extensions. A. Request by Subdivider. The subdivideror
his representative may request an extension of the expiration date of the
approved or conditionally approved tentative subdivision map by written
application to the community development department. The application shall
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
SUBDIVISION ORD. AMEND. - CITY OF R.C.
December 16, 1998
Page 2
be filed not less than sixty days before the map is to expire, and shall state
the reasons for requesting the extension.
D. City Planncr Action. Thc city planncr may 6xtcnd thc approval
of a tcntativc tract map if hc finds that thorc has bccn no significant changcs
in thc gcncral plan land usc otcmcnt, dcvclopmont codc or othcr applicablc
spccific/oommunity plan, character of thc arca within which thc map is
Iocatcd, or currcnt planning policy or past practicc that would causc thc
approvod map to bocomc inconsistent or non conforming. Ifthc city planncr
finds that thcrc is significant changc, thc city planncr shall rcfcr thc
cxtcnsion rcqucst to thc planning commission for considcration.
B. Planning Commission Action. All time extension requests
shall be processed in the same manner as the original tentative
subdivision map in accordance with Chapter 16.16.
C. Time Limit of Extension. Extensions may be granted for a period
or periods not exceeding a total of-three two years.
D. Conditions of Approval. As a condition of the extension of a
tentative tract map, after conducting a public hearing, the city planncr or
planning commission may impose new conditions or revise existing
conditions on the approved tentative map as they find necessary. All public
hearing notice requirements of the State Subdivision Map Act shall apply.
E. Appeal of Extension. The subdivider may appeal in writing any
action of the city planncr to thc planning commission, or any action oft-he
planning commission to the city council, within fifteen days of such action in
conformance to Section 16.16.130.
F. Fee. The fee for processing an extension shall be pursuant to the
City's Master Fee Resolution.
G. Findings. The granting of an extension shall require the
planning commission to make all of the findings in accordance with
Section 16.16.100. all of thc following findings to bc madc by thc approving
1. Thc previously approvcd tcntativc map is in sub'3tantiat
compliancc with thc city's currcnt gcncral plan, 3pccific plans, ordinanec3,
plans, codc3 and policics;
2. Thc cxtcnsion of thc tcntativc map will not cau3c significant
inconsistcncic3 with thc currcnt gcncral plan, specific plans, ordinancc3,
plans, codc3 and policic3;
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
SUBDIVISION ORD. AMEND. - CITY OF R.C.
December 16, 1998
Page 3
3. Thc cxtension of the tcntativc map i3 not likcly to cause
public hcalth and safcty problcms;
4. Thc cxtcnsion is within thc timc limits prc3cribcd by Statc
law and local ordinancc.
Unlcss all of thc abovc findings arc madc by thc approving body, thc
rcqucstod cxtcnsion shall bc dcniod.
SECTION 5: Section 16.20.090 is hereby amended to read, in words and figures, as
follows:
16.20.090 Expiration. The approval or conditional approval of the
tentative parcel map shall expire three years twcnty-four months from the
date of adoption of the resolution by the planning commission approving or
conditionally approving the map. The expiration of the approved or
conditionally approved tentative parcel map shall terminate all proceedings
and no parcel map of all or any portion of the real property included within
such tentative parcel map shall be filed without first processing a new
tentative parcel map.
SECTION 6: Section 16.20.100 is hereby amended to read in words and figures, as
follows:
16.20.100 Extensions. A. Request by Subdivider. The subdivider or
his representative may request an extension of the expiration date of the
approved or conditionally approved tentative map by written application to
the community development director. The application shall be filed not less
than sixty days prior to the expiration date and shall state the reasons for
requesting the extension.
B. City Enginoor Action. Thc city cnginccr may cxtcnd thc approval
of a tcntativc parccl map if he finds that thcrc has boen no significant
changc3 in thc gcncral plan land u'3c olorncnt, dcvclopmont codc or othor
applicablc spocific/community plan, charactor of thc arca within which thc
map is Iocatod, or current planning policy or past practicc that would causc
thc approved map to bocainc inoormistent or non conforming. if thc city
cnginocr finds that thcrc is significant changc, thc city cngineor shall rcfcr
thc cxtcnsion rcqucst to thc planning commission for considcration.
B. Planning Commission Action. All time extension requests
shall be processed in the same manner as original tentative parcel map
in accordance with Chapter 16.20.
C. Time Limit of Extension. Extensions may be granted for a period
or periods not exceeding a total of-t~nme two years.
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
SUBDIVISION ORD. AMEND. - CITY OF R.C.
December 16, 1998
Page 4
D. Conditions of Approval. As a condition of the extension of a
tentative parcel map, after conducting a public hearing, thecity c~ginecr or
planning commission may impose new conditions or revise existing
conditions on the approved tentative parcel map as they find necessary. All
public hearing notice requirements of the State Subdivision Map Act shall
apply.
E. Appeal of Extension. The subdivider may appeal in writing any
action of the city cnginocr to thc planning commission or any action of thc
planning commission to the city council, within fifteen days of such action in
conformance to Section 16.16.130.
F. Fee. The fee for processing an extension shall be pursuant to the
city's master fee resolution.
G. Findings. The granting of an extension shall require the
planning commission to make all of the findings in accordance with
Section 16.20.060.
SECTION 7: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Ordinance
is, for any reason, deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of
c(~mpetent jurisdiction, or preempted by legislative enactment, such decision or legislation shall not
affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section,
subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more
sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or words might subsequently be declared
invalid or unconstitutional or preempted by subsequent legislation.
SECTION 8: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the
same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily
Bulletin a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated
in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
ORDINANCE NO. ~______~ (~::~
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE
AMENDMENT 98-01, AMENDING SECTION 17.02.100 OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA DEVELOPMENT CODE, REGARDING LAPSE OF
APPROVALS AND EXTENSIONS.
A. Recitals.
1. On June 10, and continued to July 22, 1998, the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly-noticed public hearing with respect to the above-referenced
Development Code Amendment and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted its Resolution No.
98-46, recommending that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt said
amendment.
2. On December 16, 1998, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted
and concluded a duly-noticed public hearing concerning the subject amendment to the Development
Code.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.
B: Ordinance.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the
Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct.
SECTION 2: This City Council hereby finds and determines that the subject amendment
identified in this Ordinance is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality
Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section
15061(b)(3) of Chapter 3 of Division 6 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.
SECTION 3: Section 17.02.100 hereby is amended to read, in words and figures, as follows:
Section 17.02.100- Lapse of Approval and Extensions
Lapse of Approvals. Approvals for development review, conditional
use permits, variances, and minor dcvietions exceptions shall lapse
and become void 2<1 months five years from the approval date, unless
a different expiration date is specifically established as a condition of
approval and unless one of the following actions occur:
A building permit is issued in accordance with the approved
entitlement and construction is commenced and diligently
pursued toward completion; or,
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
DCA 98-01 - CITY OF R.C.
December 16, 1998
Page 2
2. A Certificate of Occupancy is issued.
Extcnsions. An cxtcnsion may bc grantcd by thc City Planncr for
lapsc of approval for projects dc3cribod in subsection A of this section.
Extcnsions may bc grantcd in 12 month incrcmcnts and not to cxcced
a total of ~1 ycars from thc original datc of approval, unlc3s othcrwisc
provided for by statc law. All requcsts for cxtcnsions should bc filcd
with thc City Planner at Icest 30 days prior to thc cxpiration datc. Thc
City Planncr may cxtcnd thc approval of a project if hc finds that thcrc
have bccn no significant changcs in thc Land Usc Elcmcnt,
Dcvclopmcnt Codc, or othcr applicablc specific/community plan;
charactcr of thc arce within which thc projcct is located; or currcnt
planning policy or past prattitc that would causc thc approved project
to bccomc inconsistcnt or non-conforming. Also, granting of an
cxtcnsion should not bc dctrimcntal to thc safcty or wclfarc or
matcrially injurious to propcrtic3 or improvcmcnts in thc vicinity. If thc
City Ptanncr finds that thcrc is significant changc, thc City Planncr
shall rcfcr thc cxtcnsion to thc Planning Commission for considcration.
SECTION 4: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Ordinance
is, for any reason, deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of
c6mpetent jurisdiction, or preempted by legislative enactment, such decision or legislation shall not
affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section,
subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more
sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or words might subsequently be declared
invalid or unconstitutional or preempted by subsequent legislation.
SECTION 5: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the
same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in theInland Valley Daily
Bulletin a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated
in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
December 16, 1998
TO:
Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
BY:
Diane O'Neal, Assistant To The City Manager
SUBJECT:
DISCUSSION OF CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEES,
SUBCOMMITTEES AND COMMISSIONS
Attached for your review is the current listing of the City Council's Committees,
Subcommittees and Commissions. Staff has added the most current City Council
Delegates for the General Plan and Central Park Subcommittees. The City Council may
wish to discuss their current designations or have the designations remain as is.
Re~ ectfull,y S#bmitted,
Jack Lam, AICP
City Manager
Attachment: City Council Committees, Subcommittees and Commission List
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEES, SUBCOMMITTEES AND COMMISSIONS
As Designated from December 16, 1998 City Council Meeting
The following is a brief synopsis of each of the Council Committees, Subcommittees and Commissions.
AB 939 SOLID WASTE TASK FORCE
This is a state mandated task force created by San Bernardino County and is made up of the Board of
Supervisors, elected representatives from each City within San Bernardino County and 10 non-elected
representatives. The purpose of the task force is to coordinate the development of the County and City's
Source Reduction and Recycling Elements and to coordinate a cost effective regional solid waste
management system.
Meets on a Quarterly Basis; the Third Thursday of Each Month from 2 p.m. to 4 p.m. at Fisk
Auditorium of the San Bernardino County Museum.
DELEGATE: Biane ALTERNATE: Dutton
AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (AQMD) COMMITTEE
Provides liaison with the South Coast Air Quality Management District regarding air quality issues.
Meets as Needed at the AQMD Headquarters in Diamond Bar
DELEGATE: Alexander AL TERNATE: Biane
BALDY VIEW PUBLIC PRIVATE COALITION (CLOUT)
Provides a program of action for the public and private sectors of the Baldy View region on issues of area-
wide importance.
Meets the fourth Thursday of each month, 7:30 a.m., Ontario Marriott Hotel
DELEGATE: Alexander AL TERNATE: Williams
CABLE TELEVISION SUBCOMMITTEE
Provides liaison for the cable television franchises and to develop the public access portion of the franchise
agreement.
Meets as Needed at the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center
DELEGATES: Curatalo and Biane
CENTRAL PARK TASK FORCE
Master Plan phasing priorities for Central Park.
Meets as Needed at the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center
DELEGATES: Curatalo and Williams
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE REPRESENTATIVE
Provides liaison between the Chamber of Commerce and the City of Rancho Cucamonga in coordinating
projects and items of mutual interest.
Meets Second Wednesday of Each Month at the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber office
DELEGATE: Dutton ALTERNATE: Williams
City Council, Committees, Subcommittees
and Commissions as Designated from
December 16, 1998
Page 2
CITY SELECTION COMMITTEE
The City Selection Committee is made up of all of the Mayors for San Bernardino County and its purpose is
to select elected representatives to various bodies which include: Local Agency Formation Commission
(LAFCO) and the Air Quality Management District. The regular meeting of the committee is held on the last
working day of April of every even numbered year at the Norman Feldhym Library in San Bernardino in
conjunction with SAN BAG agenda business starting at 9:30 a.m.
Mayor is Representative
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION SUBCOMMITTEE
Monitors the activities of the Foundation and items of mutual interest.
Meets as Needed at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center
DELEGATES: Williams and Dutton
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT/FOOTHILL BLVD. TASK FORCE
Ad Hoc Task Force assigned to work with two members of the Planning Commission to discuss and
recommend to Council a course of action for reassessment of the Foothill Boulevard Corridor from both a land
use and economic development perspective.
Meets as needed
DELEGATES: Williams and Biane
FIRE DISTRICT PERSONNEL COMMITTEE
Reviews employment eligibility lists prior to certification and other related personnel matters.
Meets as Needed at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center in accordance with Fire Dep=~ment
Rules and Regulations
DELEGATES: Alexander and Biane
GENERAL PLAN SUBCOMMITTEE
To generate an Issues Report that will establish the scope of technical and policy matters that will be
evaluated by the entire City Council and Planning Commission.
Meets as needed
DELEGATES: Biane & Dutton, Macias and Mannerino
HISTORIC CULTURAL RESOURCE MITIGATION TASK FORCE
Formulates standard procedures for mitigation of adverse impacts to identified cultural or historic resources.
Meets as needed
DELEGATE: Williams
ALTERNATE: Alexander
City Council Committees, Subcommittees
and Commissions as Designated from
December 16, 1998
Page 3
HOUSING SET ASIDE SUBCOMMITTEE
Reviews affordable housing needs and develops strategy and programs for agency set-aside money.
Meets first Tuesday of February at 8:30 a.m. and as needed at Rancho Cucamonga Civic
Center
DELEGATES: Biane and Alexander
INLAND EMPIRE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES
The Inland Empire League is one of fifteen divisions within the League of California Cities and functions as
an "arm" of cities. The League also provides training, legislative tracking, and research for associate cities.
Meets monthly and/or quarterly as needed; location changes each month
DELEGATE: Biane ALTERNATE: Curatalo
LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES - ECONOMIC, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT &
SUBCOMMITTEE
Reviews and discusses statewide policy and legislation affecting these topics.
Meets quarterly on the 2nd Friday of the month; location changes
DELEGATE: Biane
HOUSING
LIBRARY SUBCOMMITTEE
Provides a liaison on library issues.
Meets the first Tuesday of February at 9:00 a.m. and as needed at the Rancho Cucam_ onga
Civic Center.
DELEGATES: Curatalo and Alexander
MOBILE HOME ACCORD REVIEW SUBCOMMITTEE
Provides liaison for the City's Mobile Home Accord and contract negotiations. The Accord is a contract
between the owners of the City's mobile home parks and the City and addresses rent stabilization for the
mobile home parks.
Meets first Tuesday of February at 10:00 a.m. and as needed at Rancho Cucamonga Civic
Center
DELEGATES: Curatalo and Alexander ALTERNATE: Biane
MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT/SIGNAGE TASK FORCE
Ad Hoc Task Force assigned to work with two members of the Planning Commission to review sign
ordinance.
Meets as Needed
DELEGATES: Curatalo and Alexander
City Council, Committees, Subcommittees
and Commissions as Designated from
December 16, 1998
Page 4
NORTH ETIWANDA PRESERVE
Established by the City Council at their February 4, 1998 meeting.
Meets as Needed
DELEGATES: Alexander
OMNITRANS
OMNITRANS is a Joint Powers Agreement which coordinates the busing needs of its associate cities.
Meets the first Wednesday of each month at Omnitrans Headquarters in San Bernardino at
8:00 a.m.
DELEGATE: Alexander AL TERNATE: Williams
ONTARIO CONVENTION & VISITORS AUTHORITY
Established by the Redevelopment Agency at their January 21, 1998 meeting to review proposed activities.
Meets as Needed
Delegate: Biane
ALTERNATE: Williams
PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES SUBCOMMITTEE
Provides liaison for the construction of park and recreation facilities and items of mutual concern.
Council determined that whole Council should review subject matter on an interim one year basis to determine
future direction of Subcommittee.
Meets first and third Wednesdays at 5:00 p.m. at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center
DELEGATES: Alexander and Williams
PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
The Council Subcommittees for these Commissions conduct the interviews for the expired terms and
vacancies as they occur and provide liaison for items of mutual interest.
Park & Recreation
Planning/HPC
DELEGATES: Dutton and Williams
DELEGATES: Alexander and Dutton
PUBLIC SAFETY SUBCOMMITTEE
Provides a liaison for public safety issues.
Meets first Tuesday of February at 10:30 a.m. & as needed at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center
DELEGATES: Williams and Curatalo
City Council Committees, Subcommittees
and Commissions as Designated from
December 16, 1998
Page 5
PUBLIC WORKS SUBCOMMITTEE
Provides liaison for public works projects throughout the City.
with this subcommittee.)
(Law Enforcement Subcommittee combined
Meets first Tuesday of each month at 8:00 a.m. at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center
DELEGATES: Williams and Biane
RAILS TO TRAILS SUBCOMMITTEE
Established by the City Council at their October 15, 1997 Meeting to review multi-use Community Trail along
the Southern Pacific Rail (SPRR) Line.
Meets as Needed
DELEGATES: Alexander and Williams
REDEVELOPMENT MARKETING SUBCOMMITTEE
Provides liaison for the marketing of the City and reviews agency marketing budget.
Subcommittee combined with this subcommittee.)
(Regional Mall
Meets first Tuesday of February at 9:30 a.m. & as needed at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center
DELEGATES: Williams and Dutton
ROUTE 30 AD HOC TASK FORCE
Created August 3, 1994 in response to residents' desire for input into the Route 30 Corridor.
Meets the second Tuesday of each month at 7:00 p.m. at the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center,
Tri-Communities Conference Room.
DELEGATES: Alexander and Williams ALTERNATE: Curatalo
ROUTE 30 CORRIDOR DESIGN JPA
Created January 19, 1994, to address Route 30 Corridor concerns for San Bernardino and Los Angeles
Counties.
Meets the second Tuesday of each month at 10:00 a.m., meeting site rotates
DELEGATES: Williams and Curatalo AL TERNATE: Alexander
SANBAG
SAN BAG is the regional planning authority of which the City participates in through a Joint Powers
Agreement.
Meets the first Wednesday of each month at the Norman Feldhym Library in San Bernardino
at 9:30 a.m.
DELEGATE: Alexander ALTERNATE: Williams
City Council, Committees, Subcommittees
and Commissions as designated from
December 16, 1998
Page 6
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS (SCAG) - REGIONAL COUNCIL
SCAG is an association of County and City governments and is a Council of Governments (COG). The
purpose of such councils is to provide a forum where members can reach agreement on issues of common
concern and develop regional planning approaches.
Meets 1st Thursday of each month, and Annual meeting held in March of each year; location
changes (the last two years meetings were held in Brea)
DELEGATE: Alexander AL TERNATE: Biane
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS (SCAG) - SOLID WASTE SUBCOMMITTEE
Discusses regional solid waste issues.
Meets 1st Tuesday of the month; location changes.
DELEGATE: Biane
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS (SCAG) - COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT SUBCOMMITTEE
Discusses regional community and economic development policy.
Meets 1st Thursday of each month; location changes.
DELEGATE: Alexander
COUNCIL COMMITTEES/SUBCOMMITTEES AND COMMISSIONS
December 16, 1998
Alexander
Air Quality Management District (AQMD) Committee
Baldy View Public Private Coalition (CLOUT)
City Selection Committee
Fire District Personnel Committee
Historic Cultural Resource Mitigation Task Force
Housing Set Aside Subcommittee
Library Subcommittee
Mobile Home Accord Review Subcommittee
Multi-Family DevelopmentJSignage Task Fome
North Etiwanda Preserve
Omnitrans
Park and Recreation Facilities Subcommittee
Planning/Historic Preservation Subcommittee
Rails to Trails Subcommittee
Rt. 30 Ad Hoc Task Force
Rt. 30 Corridor Design JPA
SAN BAG
SCAG Regional Council
SCAG Community & Economic Development Subcommittee
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
Alternate
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
Alternate
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
Biane
AB939 Solid Waste Task Force
Air Quality Management District (AQMD) Committee
Cable Television Subcommittee
Economic Development/Foothill Blvd. Task Force
Fire District Personnel Committee
General Plan Subcommittee
Housing Set Aside Subcommittee
Inland Empire League of California Cities
League of California Cities Economic, Comm Dev & Hsg Subcorn
Mobile Home Accord Review Subcommittee
Ontario Convention & Visitors Authority
Public Works Subcommittee
SCAG Solid Waste Subcommittee
SCAG-Regional Council
DELEGATE
Alternate
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
Alternate
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
Alternate
COUNCIL COMMITTEES/SUBCOMMITTEES AND COMMISSIONS
December 16, 1998
Curatalo
Cable Television Subcommittee
Central Park Task Force
Inland Empire League of California Cities
Library Subcommittee
Mobile Home Accord Review Subcommittee
Multi-Family Development/Sign Task Force
Public Safety Subcommittee
Rt. 30 Ad Hoc Task Force
Rt. 30 Corridor Design Authority
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
Alternate
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
Alternate
DELEGATE
Dutton
AB939 Solid Waste Task Force
Chamber of Commerce Representative
Community Foundation Subcommittee
General Plan Subcommittee
Park and Recreation Commission Subcommittee
Planning/Historic Preservation Commission Subcommittee
Redevelopment Marketing Subcommittee
Alternate
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
Williams
Central Park Task Force
Chamber of Commerce Representative
Community Foundation Subcommittee
Economic Development/Foothill Blvd. Task Force
Historic Cultural Resource Mitigation Task Force
Ontario Convention & Visitors Authority
Park and Recreation Commission Subcommittee
Park and Recreation Facilities Subcommittee
Public Works Subcommittee
Public Safety Subcommittee
Rails to Trails Subcommittee
Redevelopment Marketing Subcommittee
Rt. 30 Ad Hoc Task Force
Rt. 30 Corridor Design Authority
Baldy View Public Private Coalition (CLOUT)
Omnitrans
SAN BAG
DELEGATE
Alternate
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
Alternate
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
Alternate
Alternate
Alternate
h: Donna\data\ccsu bcom.98
CITY OF RANC! IO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
December 16, 1998
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
Signage Task Force
Brad Buller, City Planner and Nancy Fong, AICP, Senior Planner
SIGNAGE TASK FORCE - A consideration of the recommendations of the Task
Force.
RECOMMENDATION
The Task Force recommends the City Council approve the strategy for addressing sign
maintenance, support the recommended priority for enforcement efforts and amend the Sign
Ordinance to set a minimum letter height for monument signs.
BACKGROUND
The Task Force conducted seven workshops and one field trip to review and discuss various issues
and topics on signs such as the appropriate sizes of sign area for monument signs, and wall signs,
flexibility for sign logos, letter styles, and colors, the proliferation of illegal signs, and the lack of
maintenance of signs. The Task Force reconvened in April and May 1998 when Councilman Jim
Curatalo replaced former Councilman Rex Gutierrez as a member. The Task Force concluded their
assessment of sign issues and forwarded the recommendations to the Planning Commission for
consideration. The Commission reviewed the information at the September 23, 1998, meeting and
unanimously supported the Task Force recommendations.
ANALYSIS
This section of the report summarizes the Task Force discussion, conclusion and recommendations
based on a series of workshops. Minutes of the workshops, field tour and survey summary are
attached.
A. Summary of Discussion:
Monument Signs (Tenant Identification): The Task Force was concerned with the
illegible sizes of businesses' names on the monument signs. Based on the field tour
of monument signs around the City, the Task Force recommended that the letter
height for a tenant's sign should be no smaller than 8 inches. This recommendation
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
SIGNS TASK FORCE
December 16, 1998
Page 2
would necessitate an amendment to the Sign Ordinance because the current codes
only suggest a minimum of 8-inch letter height. The Task Force was also concerned
with the sign area for the monument sign and had considered reducing it from 48 to
36 square feet. Because the City had amended the Sign Ordinance in 1994 to
increase the sign area from 24 to 48 square feet, the Task Force concluded that the
current size of 48 square feet should be maintained.
Tenants' Wall Siqns: The Task Force raised two primary concerns with tenants'
signs: 1) whether small tenants within a center should enjoy the same flexibility as
major tenants with bigger and more signs since they (small tenants) are the least
exposed to street frontages, and 2) whether there should be more flexibility in
allowing logos, colors, letter styles, cannister style signs, etc., for all sizes of tenants
signs. To assess and better understand their concerns, the Task Force conducted
a field tour of signs in various shopping centers within the City. The purpose of the
tour was to view the signs as to the differences in letter height, sign area, colors and
placement, among major anchors, large and small tenants, as well as the different
styles of sign programs from cannister to individual letters. A developer typically
would create a sign program with a hierarchy of sign criteria for the different types
of tenants, in response to the City's request; and, owners of shopping centers such
as Lewis Homes have stated that retailers (small or large) have accepted the fact
that major anchors are given the most flexibility in the size and number of signs
because they generate the most customers to a center. Developers also include
criteria having flexibility in letter styles, logos, and graphics, or letter symbols in a
"can" next to the individual letter sign copy provided the logo is the same sign height.
The Task Force concluded that a hierarchy of sign criteria for the different types of
tenants should be maintained, and sign criteria for placement, area, colors, and the
preference of individual letters instead of cannister styles of signs should be
continued.
Lack of Maintenance of Signs and Enforcement of 111eqal Siqns: The consensus of
the Task Force was that they believed illegal signs have increased within the City
and that some permanent signs in shopping centers were not well maintained, which
lead to the perception of a declining neighborhood. In reviewing the issues, the
Task Force invited the City's Code Enforcement staff to present an overview of the
status of sign enforcement. The purpose was to assist the Task Force in developing
recommendations that would be forwarded to the Council to address the issues.
Based on Code Enforcement staff input, the Task Force believed that educating and
reminding property owners of shopping centers to properly maintain signs would
address the issue. However, the Task Force also believed that a notice and
abatement process should be developed and only used as a last resort when
property owners fail to address the maintenance issue.
Summar~ of Task Force Recommendations:
Siqn Maintenance: The Task Force recommends that the Council review and rank
the proposed strategies below in addressing the sign maintenance issues, and direct
Code Enforcement staff to begin the program. The strategies are as follows:
/D_5'
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
SIGNS TASK FORCE
December 16, 1998
Page 3
Send notices to property owners and/or property managers, which stress the
importance of well-maintained signs and the need to fix signs in disrepair in
a timely manner.
Prepare a Chamber of Commerce newsletter article about the impodance of
well designed and maintained signs.
Conduct a citywide survey of all signs that require maintenance and, at its
conclusion, begin a notice and abatement process.
Staff Comment: Staff will prepare a standard letter for sending notices to property
owners on the need for sign maintenance, and an educational article about the
importance of well designed and maintained signs. Staff will work with
representatives of Chamber of Commerce to have the educational article published
in their newsletter. Additional resources (an increase of number of person-hours)
for Code Enforcement staff would be needed to conduct a citywide survey of signs
that need maintenance and to develop a notice and abatement process.
Enforcement of Illeqal Sians: The Task Force recommends that the Council
establish the following priorities for Code Enforcement staff in the enforcement of
illegal signs:
A-frame signs placed within public right-of-way and within street landscape
setback area (not allowed by Code).
b. Display of multiple banners (Code allows display of one banner at a time).
Display of hot air balloons (not allowed except under a Temporary Use
Permit for a grand opening event over a weekend).
Display of pennants or flags (not allowed except under a Temporary Use
Permit for a grand opening event).
e. Permanent window signs exceeding 30 percent of the glass area.
Display of multiple window neon signs (Code allows display of two window
neon signs of generic words and with a size of 2 square feet each; or, one
window neon sign of a mix of graphics symbols and generic words and with
a size of 4 square feet).
Staff Comment: Code Enforcement Division has concentrated the abatement of
illegal signs such as A-frames, multiple banners, window signs on all convenience
markets within the City. Based on the recommendations from the Task Force, the
Council should direct Code Enforcement staff to extend the abatement of illegal
signs listed in Items "a" through "e." Window neon signs (item f) were removed from
the list because at the November 10 meeting, members of the Task Force directed
staff to further study the concept of using neon lights as an architectural feature
integrated with the building design.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
SIGNS TASK FORCE
December 16, 1998
Page 4
Amend the Sign Ordinance to set an 8-inch minimum letter height for tenant's
identification for the Tenant ID Monument Sign.
Respectfully submitted,
William Alexi~e~
Rich Macias
WA/JC/RM/PT: N F:mlg
JJJames Curatalo
o,sto
Attachments:
Exhibit "A" - Task Force Minutes dated February 26, March 26, April 23, July 23,
September 12 (field tour), and November 12, 1997, and April 8, and
May 13, 1998
Exhibit "B"- Summary of Task Force Surveys Completed July, 1997 and May 1998
February 26, 1997
CI-i-Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT AND SIGNAGE TASK FORCE MINUTES
Special Meeting
A. CALL TO ORDER
A special meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga Multi-Family Development and Signage Task Force was held
on Wednesday, February 26, 1997, in the Planning Conference Room of the Civic Center, located at 10500
Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 5:00 p.m.
Present were Task Force members: Councilmember Rex Gutierrez; Planning Commissioner Rich Macias;
and Planning Commissioner Peter Tolstoy.
Absent was Mayor Bill Alexander.
Staff present were: Brad Bullet, City Planner; Dan Coleman, Principal Planner; Larry Henderson, Principal
Planner; Nancy Fong, Senior Planner; and Alan Warren, Associate Planner.
B. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION
B1. MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT
Brad Buller, City Planner, went over the areas highlighted on the multi-family land use map displayed in the
meeting room and provided statistics regarding the City of Irvine's current detached/attached housing ratio
(33 percent/67 percent).
Councilmember Gutierrez asked questions about the status of development regarding some of the parcels.
He said the map was most helpful and asked if it could also indicate the land use designations surrounding
the vacant multi-family parcels.
The pros and cons of locating multi-family development along Foothill Boulevard were discussed. Larry
Henderson, Principal Planner, provided a handout and analysis of the City's goals for low cost housing within
the RDA area and responded to questions from the Task Force. Other issues discussed included:
'Shuffle zoning" -trading existing multi-family zoning in sensitive areas to other, more appropriate
areas.
Identifying existing multi-family properties for aggressive development programs by City and
RDA.
Multi-Family Development and
Signage Task Force Minutes
February 26, 1997
Page 2
Mr. Buller stated that eventually, if another City-wide review is desired, staff could work up an analysis on each
vacant parcel for consideration by the Task Force.
For the next meeting, a revised City map will be prepared showing the vacant multi-family land with the
surrounding land use designations.
B2. SIGNAGE
Brad Buller, City Planner, stated that the purpose of the meeting was to identify issues with regard to signs
and to develop a scope of work. He informed Task Force members that the Planning Commission and City
Council will be considering a number of sign appeals regarding including extraneous information on
advertising. He mentioned that staff is in the process of addressing subtenant signs within service stations.
He asked the Task Force members to list their sign issues.
Councilmember Gutierrez said he would like to see more flexibility in the sign programs as to the choice of
colors, letter styles, and logos.
Mr. Buller explained to the Task Force that the City's Sign Ordinance does not limit colors. He indicated that
a sign program is proposed by the property owner and approved by the Planning Commission for each
development. He said the sign program sets the number of colors, letter styles, etc.
Councilmember Gutierrez stated that he is concerned with small tenants who are far away from the street
frontages and are not readily seen by the public. He suggested perhaps tenants from a pad building need
not be identified on the monument signs because they are closer to the street frontages, which would then
leave additional spaces to identify the smaller tenants. He also noted his concern for the number of temporaw
signs he is seeing.
Commissioner Tolstoy pointed to one of the pictures taken by sf~ff that showe, d a proliferation of windows
signs and asked Task Force members whether this is the quality of life the City wants.
Commissioner Macias and Councilmember Gutierrez agreed with Commissioner Tolstoy and stated that there
is a distinctive difference between the City and surrounding communities with regards to signs.
Mr. Buller suggested that the Task Force members begin to list their issues or concerns on signs. The
following list of issues was developed:
Subtenants' signs in a small free standing building
Subtenants' signs in major anchors
Flexibility in policies
Signs pollution
Identification versus advertising/marketing
Priorities on code enforcement of signs
Multi-Family Development and
Signage Task Force Minutes
February 26, 1997
Page 3
Because of time constraints, Mr. Buller suggested that the Task Force adjourn the meeting to March 26, 1997.
He recommended that the Task Force members make a list of issues for discussion at that meeting so as to
determine the scope of the project, the implementation, and the staff resources. He also suggested that at
some point the Task Force should invite the Chamber of Commerce to participate. He recommended that a
scope of the project be established before involving the Chamber of Commerce.
C. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
The next meeting was scheduled for March 26, 1997.
D. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
No communications were made from the public.
The meeting was adjourned at 6:06 p.m.
E. ADJOURNMENT
Respectfully submitted,
Brad Buller
City Planner
Approved: March 26, 1997
March 26, 1997
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT AND SIGNAGE TASK FORCE MINUTES
Special Meeting
A. CALL TO ORDER
A special meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga Multi-Family Development and Signage Task Force was held
on Wednesday, March 26, 1997, in the Planning Conference Room of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic
Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 5:02 p.m.
Present were Task Force members: Mayor V~lliam J. Alexander; Councilmember Rex Gutierrez; Planning
Commissioner Rich Macias; and Planning Commissioner Peter Tolstoy.
Staff present were: Brad Buller, City Planner; Larry Henderson, Principal Planner; Nancy Fong, Senior
Planner; and Alan Warren, Associate Planner.
B. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION
B1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: February 26, 1997
The minutes of the meeting of February 26, 1997 were approved by the Task Force.
B2. MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT
Councilmember Guiterrez began by stating he had studied the maps that were provided by staff and that they
had been helpful in understanding the land use relationships in the community.
Brad Buller, City Planner, briefly described the process that staff went through in providing analysis of a few
vacant multi-family sites.
Alan Warren, Associate Planner, provided simple land use analysis for one site at Lemon and Highland and
for three sites in the Victoria area.
The committee members acknowledged that there are not many multi-family parcels left in the city and few
that are isolated in predominately single family areas.
Discussion also included various methods of informing the public about existing land use plans and policies.
Periodic General Plan meetings throughout the community, inserts in the Grapevine, or investigation of setting
up a signing program for all vacant parcels (identifying their intended land use) were mentioned.
Multi-Family Development and Signage
Task Force Minutes
March 26, 1997
Page 2
Mr. Buller stated that once the Task Force makes recommendations on how the City should proceed, he will
work with the City Manager to develop a work and funding program for City Council consideration.
For the next meeting, the Committee asked for similar analysis with maps of other areas of the City.
Mayor Alexander requested figures be provided regarding the disbursement on existing multi-family units
throughout the community. He suggested that the figures be provided in quadrants around the intersection
of Haven and Base Line.
B3. SIGNAGE
Brad Buller, City Planner, stated that this meeting was a continuation of a dialogue between members of the
Task Force in identifying sign issues.
Councilmember Gutierrez brought up the issue of fairness for a small commercial center to have the same
number of monument signs and the same size of sign area as a larger commercial center. He cited the
example of a larger commercial center such as Masi Plaza and pointed to the photos that showed the
monument signs for the smaller centers along Foothill Boulevard. He thought smaller tenants in a larger
commercial center are being penalized with regard to signs.
Mr. Buller responded that Masi Plaza can have more than one monument sign and stated that the issue is a
request from the applicant to double the height of the monument to 16 feet, which would require an
amendment to the Sign Ordinance.
Mr. Buller informed the Task Force that there is a series of sign appeals that deal with national registered
logos, colors, and advertising messages. He cited Oil Max as an example. He asked the Task Force how
far the City should go in allowing advertising messages such as "10 minute oil change" or corporate colors.
Commissioner Tolstoy stated that the marketing of a business changes with the market trend and advertising
message would change with times.
C. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
The next meeting was scheduled for April 23, 1997.
D. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
No communications were made from the public.
Multi-Family Development and Signage
Task Force Minutes
March 26, 1997
Page 3
The meeting was adjourned at 6:30 p.m.
E. ADJOURNMENT
Respectfully submitted,
Brad Buller
City Planner
Approved: April 23, 1997
April 23, 1997
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT AND SIGNAGE TASK FORCE MINUTES
Special Meeting
A. CALL TO ORDER
A special meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga Multi-Family Development and Signage Task Force was held
on Wednesday, April 23, 1997, in the Planning Conference Room of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic
Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 5:03 p.m.
Present were Task Force members: Mayor William J. Alexander; Councilmember Rex Gutierrez; and Planning
Commissioner David Barker (Alternate).
Absent were Task Force members: Planning Commissioners Rich Macias and Peter Tolstoy.
Staff present were: Brad Buller, City Planner; and Alan Warren, Associate Planner.
B. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION
B1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: March 26, 1997
The minutes of the meeting of March 26, 1997 were approved by the Task Force.
B2. MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT
Brad Buller, City Planner, bdefiy described the process that staff went through in providing analysis of a few
vacant multi-family sites at the previous meetings. Additionally, he provided information on the school
impaction issues and a breakdown of the distribution of existing rental units around the intersection of Base
Line Road and Haven Avenue.
Alan Warren, Associate Planner, provided simple land use analysis for one site at Base Line Road and
Milliken Avenue, one site at Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue, one site north of Foothill Boulevard between
the 1-15 Freeway and Etiwanda Avenue, and for three sites around the 1-15 Freeway and Base Line Road.
Councilmember Gutierrez brought up the site north of Highland Avenue for additional study. He asked if staff
could work up a conceptual single family tract layout similar to those surrounding it to see if the parcel
configuration makes the site acceptable for a potential single family project. He also led discussion on the
potential for shifting multi-family units to the south side of Foothill Boulevard between Haven Avenue and the
1-15 Freeway.
Multi-Family Development and
Signage Task Force Minutes
April 23, 1997
Page 2
Mr. Buller discussed the benefit to retail and service businesses of having residences located near the Foothill
Boulevard corridor. He also provided insight into the issues needed to be studied when contemplating
introducing residential projects into areas where residential uses were not previously planned.
Shed Rojo, 12477 Tamarisk, Rancho Cucamonga, asked for clarification on some of the land use designations
in Terra Vista near Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue.
Mr. Buller stated that once the Committee makes recommendations on how the City should proceed, he will
work with the City Manager to develop a work and funding program for the City Council's consideration.
The next meeting was scheduled for May 28, 1997, and the commit'tee requested that Ms. Rojo let her
neighbors know of the next meeting and inform staff of how many express interest in attending. It was
confirmed that all of the committee meetings are open to the public.
B3. SIGNAGE
It was determined that Signage would be discussed at the next meeting.
C. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
Signage will be added to the next agenda.
D. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
There were no public comments at this time.
The meeting was adjourned at 6:10 p.m.
E. ADJOURNMENT
Respectfully submitted,
Brad Buller
City Planner
Approved:
July 23, 1997
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT AND SIGNAGE TASK FORCE MINUTES
Special Meeting
A. CAI L TO ORDER
A special meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga Multi-Family Development and Signage Task Force was held
on Wednesday, July 23, 1997, in the Planning Conference Room of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic
Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 5:18 p.m.
Present were Task Force members: Mayor William J. Alexander;, Councilmember Rex Gutierrez (arrived at
5:30 p.m.); and Planning Commissioners Rich Macias and Peter Tolstoy.
Staff present were: Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, Nancy Fong, Senior Planner, and Alan WarTen,
Associate Planner.
B. ITFMS FOR DISCUSSION
B1. APPROVAL OF MINUTFS; Apdl 23, 1997
The minutes of the meeting of April 23, 1997 were approved by the Task Force.
B2. MULTI-FAMILY DFVFLOPMFNT
This item was discussed after B3.
Alan Warren, Associate Planner, bdefiy described the general land use issues concerning the vacant
multi-family sites in the Victoda and Eftwanda areas.
Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, responded to Task Force member questions.
The Task Force concurred with the concept of using multi-family projects as a step up in land use intensity
next to commercial sites. It was agreed that where commercial sites are surrounded by streets, single family
development could be acceptable next to the commercial.
The Task Force members agreed to the following:
1. The Highland Avenue and Deer Creek site should be reconsidered by the City.
2. The Etiwanda sites along the 1-15 Freeway, just north and south of Base Line Road, need not be
reconsidered at this time.
Multi-Family Development and Signage
Task Force Minutes
July 23, 1997
Page 2
The Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue site need not be further reviewed because there is an
approved map.
Recommendations on the remaining sites should be discussed at the next meeting
A. East of the 1-15 Freeway, north of Foothill Boulevard.
B. Northwest of the mall site to the future freeway.
B3. SIGNAGE
Nancy Fong, Senior Planner, stated that the purpose of this mee~ng was for the Task Force t~ review the sign
issues listed in the staff report, and provide direction or a conclusion to them. She said that the sign issues
were compiled based on discussions at previous meetings.
The Task Force reviewed the first item in the staff report and recommended that the business community
should be better educated on the changes.
Mayor Alexander asked whether staff has records showing the City has notified the owners/property
managers of shopping centers of the changes; i.e., allowing an additional monument sign and additional sign
copies on the monument sign.
Ms. Fong replied that staff will provide those records to the Task Force.
Commissioner Tolstoy suggested that the best way to educate the business community is through the
Chamber of Commerce.
Mayor AJexander stated that he will be giving the State of the City speech at the September Chamber meeting
and he could include signs information in his speech.
Ms. Fong indicated staff will provide the necessary information for the Mayor in time for the September
meeting.
The Task Force reviewed the second item in the staff report and recommended no further discussion on the
subject.
Mayor Alexander asked how the City can encourage the property managers to be more responsive to the
needs of the tenants.
Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, informed the Task Force that typically the manager of the shopping center
will wait until the tenants' leases are up for renewal before negotiating with them for additional signage if they
desire.
Commissioner Macias felt the City's codes are already generous in allowing logos, colors, and letter styles.
//?
Recommendations on sites:
Multi-Family Development and Signage
Task Force Minutes
July 23, 1997
Page 3
The Task Force agreed and recommended no further discussion for Item 3 in the staff report.
Councilman Gutierrez arrived at 5:30 p.m.
The Task Force reviewed Item 4 in the staff report and agreed that the Council needs to establish a priodty
list for code enforcement and that additional staff would be needed to accomplish the goal.
Councilman Gutierrez stated that he is concerned with the size of the tenants' names on monument signs.
He felt the smaller letter size affects the readability of the business names. He asked if staff would provide
samples of monument signs of 24, 36, and 48 square feet in size, which would show the differences in the
letter sizes and their readability.
Mayor Alexander suggested that the best way to see the difference is to go on a field tour in the City. He
suggested noon time.
The Task Force agreed. It was requested that a field tour be set after August 10, 1997.
Nancy Fong summarized that the four items listed in the staff report have concluded and staff will provide
additional information on monument signs and arrange a field tour after August 10, 1997.
C, IDENTIFICATION OF ITFM$ FOR NFX'r MFFTING
East of the 1-15 Freeway, north of Foothill Boulevard and
Northwest of the mall site to the future freeway.
D. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THF PUB! IC
There were no public comments at this time.
The meeting was adjourned at 6:15 p.m.
F. ADJOURNMFNT
Respectfully submitted,
Approved:
Brad Buller
City Planner
September 12, 1997
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MULTI-FAMILY/SIGNAGE TASK FORCE MINUTES
A FIELD TRIP TO VIEW RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMERCIAL SIGNS
Special Meeting
A. CALL TO ORDER
A special field trip of the Rancho Cucamonga Signage Task Force was held on Friday, September 12, 1997.
The field trip was called to order at 12:10 p.m. The Task Force departed from Rancho Cucamonga Civic
Center and visited various sites within the City.
Present were Task Force members: Mayor VVilliam J. AJexander; Councilmember Rex Gutierrez; and Planning
Commissioner Rich Macias.
Absent was Task Force Member: Planning Commissioner Peter Tolstoy
Staff present were: Brad Bullet, City Planner; Nancy Fong, Senior Planner.
B. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION
B1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES; July 23, 1997
The minutes of the meeting of July 23, 1997 were approved by the Task Force.
B2. SIGNAGE FIELD TRIP
Nancy Fong, Senior Planner, described the different monument signs as the Task Force visited them at
various sites in the City. She explained that the readability of the signs is affected by the letter size, style,
colors, and length of the sign copy. She stated that script letter styles, blue or green colors on a white
background, sign copies with too many words, and too many signs on the monument make signs harder to
read. She observed that because the Sign Ordinance only recommends an 8-inch minimum letter size, staff
cannot require it as a standard.
Councilman Gutierrez thought a 36 square foot monument sign may be better than a 48 square foot one
because the number of sign copies could be reduced, increasing the readability.
There was consensus from the Task Force to discuss the size of the monument signs at the next scheduled
meeting. The Task Force also agreed to discuss the possibility that the 8-inch minimum letter size should be
a standard and not a recommendation.
Councilman Gutierrez asked why staff does not allow can signs.
Signage Task Force Minutes
September 12, 1997
Page 2
Brad Buller, City Planner, responded that there are centers and sign programs that require can signs but the
Planning Commission has established a design policy encouraging individual letters instead of can signs for
all new centers. He stated that typically all sign programs for shopping centers have been reviewed and
approved by the Planning Commission. He indicated the only exception was Masi Plaza, which was directed
to the City Planner by the City Council. He suggested the Task Force discuss the issue further and provide
direction or specific guidelines for staff regarding can signs versus signs with individual letters.
The Task Force agreed that the issue of can signs should be further discussed in the next scheduled meeting.
The Task Force also stated that they have a concern with the maintenance of signs which could lead to the
perception of a declining neighborhood.
Brad Buller suggested that the Task Force discuss the maintenance issue at the next scheduled meeting and
forward a recommendation to the City Council on establishing policies and priorities for the maintenance of
signs in the City.
The Task Force agreed that staff will set another meeting to discuss the identified issues.
C. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NFXT MEETING
The size of monument signs and can signs versus signs with individual letter.
There were no public comments.
The field trip was adjourned at 1:30 p.m.
COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
E, ADJOURNMENT
Respectfully submitted,
Approved:
Brad Buller
City Planner
November 12, 1997
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT AND SIGNAGE TASK FORCE MINUTES
Special Meeting
A. CALL TO ORDER
A special meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga Multi-Family Development and Signage Task Force was held
on Wednesday, November 12, 1997, in the Planning Conference Room of the Civic Center, located at 10500
Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 5:05 p.m.
Present were Task Force members: Mayor W~lliam J. Alexander; Councilmember Rex Gutierrez; and
Planning Commissioner Peter Tolstoy
Absent was Task Force member: Planning Commissioner Rich Macias
Staff present were: Brad Buller, City Planner; Nancy Fong, Senior Planner; and Alan Warren, Associate
Planner.
B. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION
B1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: October 22, 1997
The minutes of the meeting of October 22, 1997 were approved by the Task Force.
B2. MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT
This item was discussed after B3.
Commissioner Tolstoy felt the issues should be thoroughly discussed by the Task Force prior to completing
the survey and forwarding the results as a recommendation to the City Council. The Task Force members
agreed that another meeting, solely to discuss land use issues, should be scheduled.
Brad Buller, City Planner, stated staff would set up a meeting as requested.
B3. SIGNAGE
Brad Buller, City Planner, stated that Bill Makshanoff, Building Official, and Richard Alcorn, Code Enforcement
Supervisor, were invited to the meeting so that they could make a presentation to the Task Force about the
resources and priorities with regards to sign enforcement.
Mr. Alcom informed the Task Force that the sign enforcement program is in a reactive mode. He stated that
the sign complaints received are prioritized according to the following categories: highest are the legal or
Multi-Family Development and Signage
Task Force Minutes
November 12, 1997
Page 2
illegal signs that are public safety hazards, second are the illegal signs that Codes do not allow, and lastly the
signs without permits that could be legalized.
Commissioner Tolstoy brought up the issue of the proliferation of illegal banners in commercial centers.
Mr. Makshanoff stated that when staff responds to sign complaints in a commercial center, it is necessary to
review any other sign violations in the same center. He added that staff cannot be selective in the
enforcement of sign violations. He informed the Task Force that the proposed enforcement program is to first
conduct a photo survey of commercial centers and document the sign violations before the actual enforcement
of codes.
Mayor Alexander added that the Council has approved one additional staff position for addressing
enforcement of codes whether they are sign violations or property maintenance violations.
The Task Force supported the procedures that once a sign complaint has been received, staff will review all
other sign violations within the same center and enforce them comprehensively. The Task Force also
recommended that Code Enforcement staff complete the photo survey of commercial centers and pro-actively
address the sign violations.
Mr. Buller requested that Task Force members complete the survey in the Summary of Discussion and return
it to staff before the next scheduled meeting.
C. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
Summary of issues for Signs and Multi-Family development.
D. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
There were no public comments at this time.
The meeting was adjourned at 6:00 p.m.
E. ADJOURNMENT
Respectfully submitted,
Approved:
Brad Buller
City Planner
April 8, 1998
CI'T-Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT AND SIGNAGE TASK FORCE MINUTES
Special Meeting
A. CALL TO ORDER
A special meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga Multi-family Development and Signage Task Force was held
on Wednesday, Apdl 8, 1998, in the Planning Conference Room of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic
Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 5:00 p.m.
Present were Task Force members: Mayor W~lliam J. Alexander; Councilmember Jim Curatato; and Planning
Commissioner Peter Tolstoy
Absent was Task Force member: Planning Commissioner Rich Macias
Staff present were: Brad Bullet, City Planner; Nancy Fong, Senior Planner; Rick Gomez, Community
Development Director; Bill Makshanoff, Building Official; and Alan Warren, Associate Planner
B. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION
B1. MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT
Brad Buller, City Planner, highlighted issues and recommendations reviewed at previous meetings for new
Task Force Member Councilmember Curatalo. It was requested that members complete the site surveys for
discussion at the next meeting.
B2. SIGNAGE
Mr. Buller explained why the item of window neon signs was on the agenda. He stated that Dr. Rosenstein,
a local businessman who owns an optometrist shop, requested that the Task Force review the window neon
tubes around storefront windows of his shop and determine whether they would support an amendment to
the Sign Ordinance to allow such neon tubing. He explained that Dr. Rosenstein's request was in response
to a notice he received to abate the neon tubing, which was the result of a complaint from former.
Councilmember Gutierrez.
Bill Makshanoff, Building Official, informed the Task Force that Dr. Rosenstein has agreed to take care of the
health and safety hazards of the exposed neon tubing. He added that staff would put a hold on enforcing this
case until the Task Force has provided directions on neon tubing.
The consensus of the Task Force was to continue the item to the next meeting on May 13, 1998, so that
members could visit Dr. Rosenstein's shop to review the neon tubing around the windows and assess the
request.
Multi-FamiLy Development and Signage
Task Force Minutes
April 8, 19987
Page 2
Mr. Buller also reminded the Task Force to complete the Summary of Sign Task Force Discussion survey and
returned it to staff.
C. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
Summary of issues for Signs and Multi-Family development.
D. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
There were no public comments at this time.
The meeting adjourned at 6:00 p.m.
E. ADJOURNMENT
Respectfully submitted,
Approved:
Brad Buller
City Planner
May 13, 1998
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT AND SIGNAGE TASK FORCE MINUTES
Special Meeting
A, CALL TO ORDER
A special meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga Multi-family Development and Signage Task Force
was held on Wednesday, May 13, 1998, in the Planning Conference Room of the Civic Center,
located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to
order at 5:10 p.m.
Present were Task Force members: Mayor William J. Alexander, Council Member Jim Curatalo,
Planning Commissioner Rich Macias, and Planning Commissioner Peter Tolstoy
Staff present were: Brad Buller, City Planner; Nancy Fong, Senior Planner; and Alan Warren,
Associate Planner
B. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION
B1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: November 12, 1997 April 8, 1998
The minutes of the meetings of November 12, 1997, and Apdl 8, 1998, were approved by the Task
Force.
B2.
MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT- Discussion of Multi-Family Housing Properties in Three
Areas
This item was discussed after B3.
The Task Force agreed that Area 1, the northeast comer of Highland Avenue and Lemon Avenue,
should be included in the next available General Plan Amendment cycle. It agreed the remaining
areas could and should wait until a General Plan update or be considered in conjunction with
development proposals in and around the specific study areas.
The Task Force discussed the General Plan revision/update issue. It was recommenced that a
community-wide visioning out-reach program should be considered prior to a decision on how or
when to revise the General Plan. It was felt that in this way, the citizens could help identify what
issues need to be focused on.
SUMMARY OF DISCUSSION ON SIGNS
SIGN TASK FORCE MEETING OF JULY 23, 1997
Staff informed members of the Task Force that changes have been made to the
Sign Ordinance which allow additional project ID and tenant ID monument signs,
and that owners of shopping centers have not taken advantage of the new codes.
The Task Force believed this information is not widely known.
~ mmunity on th~
educate the business co
[~ No further discussion needed
More discussion necessary
Modification needed
Members of the Task Force raised concerns that small tenants within a center are
being penalized because they have the least number of signs and are the least
exposed to street frontages. Staff informed the Task Force that owners of shopping
centers ( Lewis Homes) have stated that retailers (small or large) have accepted
the fact that major anchors are given the most flexibility in the size and number of
signs because they generate the most customers to a center. The Task Force did
not raise additional issues on this subject.
Better educate the business community on
importance_of appropriate,signs f%major tenants
More discussion necessary
Modification needed
sign opportunities and
Members of the Task Force raised the issue that there should be more flexibility in
allowing logos, colors, letter styles, etc. Staff explained to the Task Force that a
sign program, which sets the number of signs, colors, letter styles, etc., is proposed
by the property owner and approved by the City. The Task Force did not indicate
to staff how far the City should go in allowing variation in colors. Most of the sign
programs in place allow a tenant to have a graphic logo with no restrictions on
design and colors as long as it meets the sign heighl and is within the maximum
sign area.
~J Nor rthe~
More discussion necessary
Modification needed
-2-
Members of the Task Force were concerned with the level of code enforcement of
illegal signs. Staff recommended that the Task Force make recommendation to the
City Council to establish a priority on the code enforcement of signs.
[~ No further discussion needed.
More discussion necessary
orce ' o
F ard a recommendation to the Council regarding sign enf
SUMMARY OF DISCUSSION
SIGN TASK FORCE MEETING OF NOVEMBER 12, 1997
COMPLETED ON MAY 13, 1998
At the September 12 special field trip, the Task Force visited various shopping centers
within the City to review existing monument and wall signs. Council Member Gutierrez
suggested reducing the monument sign area from 48 to 36 square feet and increasing
the readability by reducing the number of allowable tenant signs on each monument sign.
Staff Comments: Based on the recommendations of a previous sign task force that
involved members of the community, representatives from the Chamber of Commerce,
Planning Commission, and City Council, the City amended the Sign Ordinance to allow
a 48 square foot sign area for monument signs. To date we have two centers that took
advantage of the new sign codes and installed the 48 square foot monument sign.
Therefore, staff does not recommend reducing the sign area.
No further discussion needed
More discussion needed
Modification needed
(Task Force action)
The consensus of the Task Force was to establish a minimum letter height of 8 inches
to increase the readability of the sign copies on a monument sign.
Staff Comments: Staff agrees. By requiring an 8-inch letter height for each line of sign
copy and the spacing between the lines, it would increase the readability of the signs.
This 8-inch letter height standard would indirectly reduce the number of tenant signs on
the monument sign. However, this recommendation would trigger an amendment to the
Sign Ordinance.
Amend the Sign Ordinance (Task Force action)
More discussion needed
[~ No further action
The consensus of the Task Force was that the lack of maintenance of signs would lead
to the perception of a declining neighborhood. The Task Force agreed that a
recommendation should be forwarded to the City Council for establishing priorities for the
maintenance of signs in the City.
Staff Comments: Staff has invited Richard Alcorn, Code Enforcement Supervisor, to
give an overview of the sign maintenance situation at the meeting His information may
assist the Task Force in formulating recommendations to the City Council. The following
lists some suggested approaches in dealing with sign maintenance.
Send notices to any property owners and/or property managers with signs in
disrepair. The notice will stress the importance of well-maintained signs and
the need to fix disrepaired signs in a timely manner.
b. Prepare a Chamber newsletter article about the importance of well designed
and maintained signs.
c. Conduct a City wide survey of all signs and, at conclusion, begin notice and
abatement process.
[~ d. Maintain status quo and respond to complaints only.
e. A combination of the above. (Task Force recommended a combination
of items a, b and c)
The Task Force was concerned with the proliferation of illegal signs in the City. Examples
are banners, neon lights/signs, A-frame wood signs, etc. The consensus of the Task
Force was to recommend that the City Council establish priorities in the enforcement of
illegal signs. Staff has prepared the following list of types of illegal signs for the Task
Force to rank the priority of enforcement. (1 is highest and 4 is lowest)
The following are Task Force ranking by priority:
Display multiple banners (Code allows display of one banner at a time).
Rank No. 2
Display multiple window neon signs (Code allows display of one window neon
sign. Size is limited to 2 square feet for generic words and 4 square feet for a mix
of graphics symbol and generic words).
Rank No. 3
A-frame signs placed within public right of-way (not allowed by Code)
Rank No. 1
A-frame signs placed within street landscape setback area (not allowed by Code)
Rank No. 1
Display hot air balloons ( not allowed by Code)
Rank No. 4
Display of pennants or flags (not allowed by Code except under a TemporaW Use
Permit for a grand opening event).
Rank No. 5.
Permanent window signs exceeding 30 percent of the glass area (Code allows the
use of up to 30 percent of the glass area)
Rank No. 6
o
At the September 12 field tour and the October 22 meeting, the Task Force discussed the
issue of "can" versus "individual channel letter" signs. The Task Force did not come to
a consensus as to mixing the two styles of signs within a center.
Staff comments: Because of a lack of a consensus and direction, staff has prepared
the following information and questions to assist the Task Force in focusing on the issues
and arriving at a consensus and/or direction to staff.
How and when do we set up a Sign Program? VVith the development of a shopping
center, comes the establishment of a Uniform Sign Program. The developer is asked by
the City to create sign criteria for the different types of tenants in the center. The City
reviews the criteria to ensure compliance with the Sign Ordinance and the established
Sign Design Guidelines and Policies. A Planning Commission sign design policy is to
encourage the use of individual channel letter signs instead of can signs for new centers.
The use of can signs is accepted only if the architecture of the buildings is such that it
cannot accommodate individual channel letter signs. An example is the Sunrize Center
at the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Carnelian Avenue. Once the Uniform
Sign Program is approved by the Planning Commission, the developer and the City jointly
implement it, thus fostering a private/public partnership in ensuring quality signs. Staff
routinely reviews and approves signs over the counter if the proposed sign is consistent
with the approved Uniform Sign Program. In essence, the established sign program
streamlines the sign permit approval process for the tenants.
What is in a Sign Program? A center would normally have major anchors, single user
pad tenants, and in-line retail/service tenants. Tenants normally want the biggest signs
and the most colorful signs that they can get. An acceptable practice by commercial
property managers is to set up a hierarchy of sign criteria for the different types of
tenants. Major anchors (over 50,000 square feet) are given the most flexibility in the size
of the sign area, colors, letter style, logos, etc. Examples are Montgomery Wards, Target,
Best Buy. The next set of criteria is for Sub-major anchors (5,000 to 50,000 square feet)
with some restrictions on sign area for ensuring proportionality but still allowing flexibility
in colors, letter styles, and logos. Examples are Big Five, Ace Hardware, etc. Single user
pad tenants are the next level of sign criteria, with similar restrictions as the Sub-major
anchors. Examples of single user pad tenants are Chili's, Wells Fargo Bank, Blockbuster
Video, Hollywood Video, etc. In-line shops may have the most restrictive sign criteria,
limiting the sign area, height, and color choice. In all instances a sign program has a
built-in flexibility to include a logo, graphic, or letter symbol in a "can" next to the individual
letter sign copy, provided the logo is the same sign height.
Tenants' Signs Conflict with Sign Program. Businesses change their identity in
response to their marketing needs. The change in identity may require changes to their
name, the logo design, a switch to can signs showing graphics and letters instead of
channel letters, etc. Such a change could conflict with the sign program. Staff has
responded by amending sign programs to accommodate tenants' needs as long as the
integrity of the program is intact.
Questions for the Task Force?
Should a 1,000 square foot florist tenant enjoy the same sign criteria as a Target
store?
No (Task Force action)
Should the City continue to maintain a hierarchy of sign criteria for the different
types of tenants?
Yes (Task Force action)
Should the City/developer continue to set up criteria for sign location, area, colors,
content, and individual channel letter style of signs? (Graphics showing centers
with signs that comply with these sign criteria will be available at the meeting for
discussion)
Yes (Task Force action)
Should the City/developer set up criteria for sign locations and area only, leaving
the judgement of content, colors, and style of signs to the developer? (Graphics
showing centers with signs that are regulated on location and sign area only will
be available at the meeting for discussion.)
Yes (Task Force action)
NOTES (Please use space below to jot down notes if needed):
I&l
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON*GA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
December 16, 1998
TO:
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager
FROM:
Rick Gomez, Community Development Director
Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director
BY:
Karen McGuire-Emery, Senior Park Planner
Paula Pachon, Management Analyst II
SUBJECT: PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES UPDATE
BACKGROUND
In accordance with the City Council's request to become more informed of park and recreation
facility issues, programs, projects and events, this report is provided to highlight pertinent issues,
projects and programs occurring in both the Community Services Department and the Park
Design/Development and Maintenance Sections of Engineering.
A. PARKS AND FACILITIES UPDATE
Rancho Cucamonga Family Sports Center:
· Lewis Homes is continuing to address several warranty issues, including replacement of the
carpeting in the Jazzercise room.
Rancho Cucamonga Public Library:
· The construction project was awarded to Schechtman Construction Company on November
4, 1998, existing landscape and irrigation has been relocated and the new concrete slabs have
been poured. Interior improvements began on December 7 and are progressing on schedule.
· A storage container has been set at the extreme northwest corner of the Library to store
donated books for the Friends of the Library during the Library expansion project. This
container is expected to stay on-site for 3045 days.
Stadium:
The first plan check for the addition of the Softball field ramps at Sports Complex for ADA
compliance has been completed by staff and returned to the design engineer for corrections.
· The Cross Aisle Waterproofing bid opening was November 25. Final preparations are being
made to award the contract.
· Specifications have been received for the re-paint/repair of the exterior stadium grandstand
and have been distributed to staff for review.
· Bulbs were replaced in all the light fixtures (70-75) in Lot G and sports field (45). This
project was done in-house.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES UPDATE
December 16, 1998
Page 2
Stadium turf renovations will be complete this week. Sports Complex soccer field
renovations are undenvay now that the Vietnam Memorial Moving Wall is gone. A
temporary fence was installed to keep players off the field during the renovation period.
Spruce Avenue Park Skate Facility:
· The Skate Park has been completed and grand opening ceremonies were held on December
3, 1998. The park has become a huge success with very good dally turnouts.
Heritage Park:
· An evening meeting was held with City Staff, Riding Club representatives, and other users
of the Heritage Park equestrian arenas. The footing in the two arenas and ways to improve
it was discussed. Regrading occurred the next day and user reports have been good.
Communication will continue with the users, and additional improvements made as needed.
Eftwanda Creek Park:
· The costs estimates are being prepared by staff for the addition of two scoreboards and will
be provided to City Council for approval in January 1999.
Central Park:
· Proposals for the community survey have been received from four consultants and are being
analyzed by staff.
· A Task Force meeting was held on Tuesday, December 8, from 6 - 8 p.m.
B. COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE
Seniors:
· The December 28, 1998, meeting of the Senior Advisory Committee has been canceled due
to the holidays. The next meeting date for the Committee will be January 25, 1999. At the
time this report was prepared the agenda for the January meeting had not been set.
· On Tuesday, November 24, 1998, between 9:00 a.m. and 11:30 a.m. the Senior Center
hosted its annual 'Crafty Seniors' Craft Show. Hand made crafts and baked goods were
featured at the sale.
· Sleigh bells will ring in the holidays on Tuesday, December 22, 1998, from 10:00 a.m. until
11:00 a.m. at the Senior Center. Special holiday entertainment and refreshments will make
this a joyous event for all.
· The New Year will be rung in early at the Senior Center. Join us on Wednesday, December
30, 1998, at 10:00 a.m. to toast in the new and remember the old. Entertainment and
refreshments will be part of the festivities.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES UPDATE
December 16, 1998
Page 3
Teens:
Youth
·
The Teen Center has begun a staff training program in cooperation with West End Family
Counseling, a local mental health provider in the corn munity. The training is geared towards
helping staff understand social issues and pressures faced by teens and how to recognize
signs that may alert them to a teen with a serious problem.
The Center is also gearing up for its extended hours for the school's holiday break. During
the two week break, the Center will be open from 10:00 a.m. until 6:00 p.m. Monday through
Thursday and from 10:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. on Fridays. Special events and prize drawings
are planned during this time. In January the Teen Center will host a Super Bowl Party.
The Teen Center is starting up a new schedule of monthly special events. January features
an all night "who-dun-it" mystery, the Cucamonga Caper. In February, the 70's return for
a special disco party. In March, a triple sport challenge is planned. These events are
scheduled for the fourth Friday of each month.
In January and February our Teen Trips program will hit the slopes with two very popular
ski trips to Mountain High. These annual trips are planned on the school holidays for Martin
Luther King Jr., January 18, 1999 and President's Day, February 15, 1999.
The Teen Recreation Activity Club (TRAC) had avery successful fund raiser at the Founders
Day Celebration. The twice monthly "Night on the Town" program has been very successful
this year. The program offers an all day babysitting program in December for busy parents
who need time to shop for the holidays.
In January, Teen Workshops begins its 1999 year with the popular Babysitters Workshop on
January 23, 1999. Representatives from the Police and Fire Departments discuss safety
measures and how to handle emergencies. Community Services Department staff will
discuss how to entertain children. In March, 1999, the Job Skills Workshop returns to train
teens on how to find a job. Both of these workshops are free.
Activities:
The Playschool program has been submitted for a Program Excellence Award for the
California Park and Recreation Society (CPRS). The addition of the integrated program at
the Mulberry Learning Center has been so successful, that this element of the program was
highlighted in the awards packet. Award winners will be announced at the CPRS annual
conference to be held in Santa Clara this year in February.
The annual Breakfast with Santa was held on Saturday, December 5, 1998, at the Rancho
Cucamonga Senior Center. This year the City restructured the event to be able to
accommodate more children and their parents. At the time this report was prepared,
approximately 250 were expected to attended. The event is co-sponsored by the Rancho
Grande Kiwanis Club.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES UPDATE
December 16, 1998
Page 4
Youth
·
Sports:
The Sports Advisory Committee will next meet on Tuesday, January 12, 1999 at 7:00 p.m..
At the time this report was prepared agenda items had not been identified. The staff field
allocation proposal for the Spring/Summer of 1999 was adopted at the Committee's
November 18, 1998 meeting. This field allocation proposal covers the time frame of
February 1, 1999 through August 31, 1999.
One hundred and twenty-eight (128) three to five year old boys and girls registered for the
Fall Pee Wee Deck Hockey program which began on November 30, 1998. This program
continues through January 10, 1999. The program takes place at the RC Family Sports
Center. The program is offered Mondays from 6:00-7:00 p.m., Tuesdays from 6:00-7:00
p.m. and Saturday mornings from 8:00-9:00 a.m. and 9:30-10:30 a.m.
Registration for the Pee Wee Basketball program began on November 2, 1998 and continues
through January 14, 1999. Approximately 250 boys and girls ages 3-5 are expected to
register for the program.
Three hundred and five (305) boys and girls ages 5-17 are participating on 37 teams for the
Fall season of the Youth Roller Hockey program. The season began games on November
9, 1998 at the Epicenter Expanded Parking Lot. Playoffs will begin during the first couple
of weeks of January, pending weather.
Youth Basketball registration ended November 25, 1998. There are 954 boys and girls ages
5-17 registered. Practices will begin on December 21, 1998, with the first games of the
season scheduled for Saturday, January 12, 1999.
Youth Indoor Soccer takes place at the RC Family Sports Center. One hundred and fifty
(150) boys and girls ages 6-14 are participating on 17 teams. The season began on October
28, 1998 and concludes on December 18th. Playoff games will follow the conclusion of the
regular games.
Thirty (30) children are participating on three teams in the Youth Indoor Volleyball program
which takes place at the RC Family Sports Center. The participants are young girls ages 11-
13.
Rancho Cucamonga Family Sports Center:
· The facility continues to be extremely busy. During the last month (November 1-22, 1998)
facility usage for open/drop in play was: Adult Basketball - 319 participants; Youth
Basketball - 460 participants; Adult Racquetball - 276 participants; Youth Racquetball - 55
participants; Adult Volleyball -32 participants; Youth Volleyball - 9 participants.
· The RC Family Sports Center has been submitted for a Park Planning and Design Excellence
Award to the California Park and Recreation Society (CPRS). CPRS annually recognizes
outstanding achievements in facility design and operation. The winners will be announced
at the annual CPRS Conference which this year will be held in February in Santa Clara.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES UPDATE
December 16, 1998
Page 5
Adult
Sports:
Registration for Adult Leagues for Basketball, Racquetball and Volleyball at the RC Family
Sports Center is being taken through the first week in January, 1999.
Currently 2,624 men and women are participating on 164 Adult Softball teams. The Fall
season concludes at the end of December.
Adult Softball registration takes place for Winter leagues between December 14-22, 1998.
Registration is currently being accepted for Adult Soccer. Leagues are scheduled to begin
play in January, 1999.
Facilities:
· Requests for facility rentals for Lions Center West have been increasing steadily since the
facility opened in October. Staff is researching ways to actively market the facility and has
stepped up the customer service level to those who are renting the building.
· With the addition of new facilities, staff is in the process of reviewing policies regarding
facility rentals and related fees and charges. Any recommended fee changes will be
incorporated into the City's report to Council detailing suggested changes to our
comprehensive fee schedule.
· Lions Center East will be in a down mode when classes and Playschool are on holiday
hiatus. Staff uses this time to do through cleaning and maintenance checks on the building.
Facility maintenance staff is still working with Lewis Homes and vendors to address the
punch list items for the Rancho Cucamonga Family Sports Center.
Cable television access for 'the Rancho Cucamonga Family Sports Center, and the Teen
Center in particular, continues to be an issue being addressed by staff.
The Grapevine:
· The Winter issue of The Grapevine is due to be distributed in early December, 1998. The
cover story focused on the importance of healthy businesses to the local economy.
Contract Classes:
· The Fall session of contract recreation classes comes to a close in December. The Winter
session begins in January.
Community Wide Special Events:
· Founders Day Parade and Celebration was held Saturday, November 14, 1998. The theme
for this year's event was "American Pride: A Tribute to Our Veterans". The parade was a
great success and featured Honorary Grand Marshals that were resident veterans, one from
each branch of the military. The Honorary Grand Marshals selected ranged in age from 68
to 82.
The Celebration began at the Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter and Adult Sports Complex at
10:00 a.m. To assist hungry vendors during their booth set-up on the day of the event, the
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES UPDATE
December 16, 1998
Page 6
Rancho Grande Kiwanis Club came out beginning at 8:00 a.m. to serve a hearty Pancake
Breakfast. Festivities for the day also included the parade award ceremony, an art and craft
fair (80 art/craft vendors and in-home businesses), continuous entertainment, fun activities
and rides for the children, great food vendors. This year, new to the event, the Rancho
Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce held their Business Expo in conjunction with our
Founders Day Celebration. Approximately 25 business vendors participated in the event at
the Epicenter.
There were two unfortunate disappointments this year associated with the event -- we had
to cancel both the Farmers Market and the Car Show due to lack of participation. Next year
staff will need to market these activities earlier and network with other cities and agencies
to attract participants for both of these activities.
Spruce Avenue Park Skate Facility Opening - On December 3, 1998, a ribbon cutting
ceremony was held at the Skate Facility. The event was attended by City Council, members
of the Park and Recreation Commission, Department Heads, Active Ride Shop
representatives, members of the skate facility task force, and members of the community.
Amusing Children's Theater (ACT) will return on the third Saturday of each month
beginning in January, 1999 and will run through April, 1999. Staff is in the process of
planning and contracting a variety of entertainment and performances for the entire family.
All performances will be held at Lions West.
Proposed Boxing Program:
· Staff is currently researching community organizations who potentially may be interested
in providing a boxing program.
Senior
Transportation Program:
The bus for the senior transportation program has been received by the City. Since the
vehicle was purchased through the State of California Procurement Department the title of
the vehicle must be issued directly to the City. The YMCA has requested that the City pay
the $1,308 transfer of title fee. It is anticipated that transfer of title will be accomplished
within the next 4-6 weeks. Staff is working with the vendor for the installation of the base
station and radios that were purchased by the City to augment this program. The YMCA and
the City have been working with a graphic artist for the development of a design for the
program and the bus. Staff is seeking bids for the installation of the design onto the bus.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES UPDATE
December 16, 1998
Page 7
Trips and Tours:
· Huntington Harbor"Cruise of Lights" - December 19, 1998. A wonderful trip is planned to
view the beautifully decorated waterfront homes in Huntington Harbor. Along the hour
voyage participants will see hundreds of twinkling lights outlining the homes as the boat
winds its way through the Huntington Harbor channels. Cost of the trip is $26 per person.
Two buses for this trip are sold out.
· Rose Parade - January 1, 1999. Participants will not only get to see the world famous Rose
Parade and its giant floral floats, bands and equestrian units but they get there in style and
without any hassle. Parade goers will ride the Metrolink to Arcadia where they will then
board buses to take them to their special grandstand seats on Colorado Boulevard. (Sorry,
trip is sold out.)
· Long Beach Aquarium - January 23, 1999. Participants will discover the wonder of the sea
on this trip. Everything from massive sharks to the bright orange Garibaldi fish native to
Califomia. Cost for this trip is $26. (At the time this report was prepared there were 20
spaces available.)
Human Services:
· Commodity Distribution - First Monday of the month from 1:30 p.m. until 3:00 p.m. at the
Senior Center. USDA surplus food products are distributed to low income Rancho
Cucamonga residents on a first come, first served basis. Food will be distributed on January
4, 1999.
· The Doctor is In - Free monthly seminars on topics of interest. All seminars take place at
the Senior Center between 12 noon and 2:00 p.m.. January 19 - "Osteoporosis: What's
New, What's Old and What the Future Holds. Featured speaker: Dr. Harvey D. Cohen.
· Elder Law Seminars - Monthly seminars for senior citizens. All seminars take place at the
Senior Center between 11:00 a.m. and 12 noon. December 18 - "Does A Reverse Mortgage
Make Sense for Me?" January 22 - "How Does the New Tax Law Affect the Capital Gains
on the Sale of my Home".
· Senior Information and Assistance - Referral service available at the Senior Center by
appointment on the 4th Thursday of the month between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 12 noon.
Services are provided by the County of San Bernardino, Department of Aging and Adult
Services.
Park and Recreation Commission:
· During the reporting period the Park and Recreation Commission discussed or took action
on the following items:
- Consideration and discussion of recommendation from Route 30 Task Force relating to
parking at West Beryl Park.
- Consideration and discussion of recommendations for establishment of a Community
Services Network.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES UPDATE
December 16, 1998
Page 8
- Review and update of Community Services Department's grant awards and potential
funding opportunities.
- Consideration of 1999 Spring/Summer Youth Sports Group Field Allocation proposal.
- Consideration and discussion regarding waiver of December 17, 1998, Park and Recreation
Commission meeting.
- Update and establishment of future agenda items for the Sports Advisory Committee.
- Update and establishment of future agenda items for the Senior Advisory Committee.
- Consideration of waiving December 28, 1998, Senior Advisory Committee meeting.
Epicenter:
· Since the last reporting period the following activities have taken place at the Epicenter:
-Community Services Department - Founders Day Celebration (November 14, 1998)
-Commercials While U Wait - Agrarfrost (German frozen food commercial) (December 9
& 10, 1998; rain date: December 11, 1998)
· Staff is working with the following representatives for future events at the Epicenter:
-Community Services Department - Children's Concert (April 3, 1999)
-Calvary Chapel Chino Hills - Sunrise Easter Services (April 4, 1999)
-Califomia Association of School Transportation Officials - School Bus Roadeo (April
16/17, 1999) -Hillside Community Church - Soapbox Derby & Community Fair
(May 30/31, 1999)
-AB Miller High School - 1999 Graduation (June 16, 1999)
-Rancho Cucamonga High School - 1999 Graduation (June 17, 1999)
Staff is in the process of preparing marketing information conceming the Epicenter for
inclusion on the Intemet.
ed,
Cc r~unity Dev~opment Director
Community Services Director
R~. :KM:KME