HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996/06/19 - Agenda PacketCITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
REGULAR MEETINGS
1st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:00 p.m.
June 19, 1996
Ci¢ic Center
Council Chmnbers
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucmnonga, CA 91730
City Councilmembers
William J. Alexander, Mayor
Rex Gutierrez, Mayor Pro Tem
Paul Biane, Councilmember
James V. Cura:alo, Councilmember
Diane Williams, Councilmember
Jack Larr,, City Manager
James L. Marcman, City Attorney
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk
City Oice: 989-1851
City Council Agenda
June 19, 1996
All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The
deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on the Tuesday prior to
the meeting. The City Clerk°s Office receives all such items.
1. Roll Call:
A. CALL TO ORDER
Alexander Biane , Curatalo
Gutierrez , and Williams__
B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
Presentation of Proclamation to the Rancho Cucamonga Indians
Baseball Team wishing them luck as they represent Rancho
Cucamonga in the Youth Baseball Tournament in Cooperstown,
New York.
Presentation to Gary Varney, Street Maintenance Superintendent, as
the Maintenance Superintendents Association Inland Empire/Desert
Chapter's "Manager of the Year."
C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
This is the time and place for the general public to address the City
Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue
not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive
testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are
to be limited to five minutes per individual.
D. CONSENT CALENDAR
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and
non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time
without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember or
member of the audience for discussion.
Approval of Minutes:
May15,1996
May 30,1996
June 6,1996
Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 5/22/96, 5/29/96 and 6/5/96;
and Payroll ending 5/16/96 for the total amount of $2,487,083.27.
Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of May
31, 1996.
Alcoholic Beverage Application for On-Sale Beer and Wine for
Grazianos Pizza, Salvatore and Vincent Ancona, 9225 Base Line
Road #L.
Alcoholic Beverage Application for New Kishi Restaurant, Raymond
and Yoshiko Kishi, 8760 Base Line Road.
14
19
21
City Council Agenda
June 19, 1996
Approval to appropriate $9,240.00 awarded by the California State
Library into Library Accounts.
7. Approval to Declare Surplus miscellaneous City property.
Approval of Annual Loan Transaction between the City of Rancho
Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency.
Approval of Salary and Benefits Resolution for Fiscal Year 1996/97
and Rescinding Resolution No. 95-113 (1995/96 FY Salary and
Benefits).
RESOLUTION NO. 96-096
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
RESCINDING RESOLUTION 95-113 AND
IMPLEMENTING SALARY AND BENEFITS FOR
FISCAL YEAR 1996/97
10.
Approval of Light Variance Request for City Little League
Championship Baseball Tournament at Red Hill Park on Sixty and
Ninety Foot Fields until 10:30 p.m.
11.
Approval to award purchase of Electronic Records Management
System in the amount of $50,250.00 from Account No. 01~4126-
7047.
12.
Approval to purchase one (1) new Layton-F525 Paver Towbox and
Trailer from Great West Equipment, Inc. Of San Jose, California, to
be funded from Gas Tax Funding, Account No. 09-4637-7044 for the
amount of $31,819.65 and to appropriate these funds for Fiscal Year
1996/97 if equipment is not delivered on or before June 30, 1996.
13.
Approval of Map and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape
Maintenance District No. 4 and Street Lighting Maintenance District
Nos. 1 and 4 for Parcel Map 14806, located on the north side of
Foothill Boulevard between Spruce and Elm Avenues, submitted by
Western Development Company.
RESOLUTION NO 96-097
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 14806
RESOLUTION NO 96-098
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN
TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NO. 4 AND STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 FOR
PARCEL MAP 14806
24
25
36
37
38
55
56
57
58
60
61
City Council Agenda
June 19, 1996
14.
Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security,
Vintners Walk Encroachment/Maintenance Agreement and Ordering
the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street
Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for Parcel Map 13845,
located on the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and
Rochester Avenue, submitted by Masi Commerce Center Partners.
RESOLUTION NO. 96-086
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING AN ENCROACHMENT/
MAINTENANCE FOR VINTNERS WALK OF
PARCEL MAP NO. 13845
RESOLUTION NO. 96-087
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 13845,
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY
RESOLUTION NO. 96-088
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN
TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR
PARCEL MAP 13845
15.
Approval to execute Improvement Agreement and Improvement
Security for Conditional Use Permit No. 95-39, located on the south
side of Arrow Route (12167 Arrow Route) east of the I-15 Freeway,
submitted by American Pacific Concrete Pipe Company (AMPAC).
RESOLUTION NO 96-099
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 95-39
16.
Approval to execute Improvement Agreement and Improvement
Security for 5701 Sapphire Street, located on the east side of
Sapphire Street south of Brittany Lane, submitted by SH & CH
Development Company.
64
67
68
69
72
74
75
City Council Agenda
June 19, 1996
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
RESOLUTION NO 96-100
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVI NG IMPROVEMENT AG R E E M E NT AN D
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR 5701
SAPPHIRE STREET
Approval to execute Density Bonus Agreement (CO 96-034)
between Northtown Housing Development Corporation and City of
Rancho Cucamonga for a 14-unit Affordable Housing Project on
1.38 acres of land, located on the south side of Main Street, between
Archibald and Reid Avenues, and authorizing the Mayor to sign the
same.
Approval to award and authorization for execution of contract (CO
96-035) for the FY 1995/96 Pavement Rehabilitation Program,
Various Locations, to California Pavement Maintenance Company,
Inc., in the amount of $230,737.00 ($209,760.99, plus 10%
contingency) to be funded from Gas Tax, Proposition 111, Account
No. 10-4637-9113 and Account Nos. 40-4130-8050, 41-4130-8050
and 43-4130-8050.
Approval to award and authorization for execution of contract (CO
96-036) for the Hermosa Pavement Rehabilitation from Fourth
Street to Sixth Street, north of Sharon Circle to Eighth Street and
south of Devon Street to Foothill Boulevard, to Manhole Adjusting
Contractors, Inc., in the amount of $230,145.00 ($209,223,40, plus
10% contingency) to be funded from Measure I, Account No.32-
4637-9520 and SB 140, Account No. 35-4637-9520.
Approval to award and authorization for execution of contract (CO
96-037) for the Roof Replacement for the Civic Center and Police
Station to be funded from approved RDA 1995/96 Funds, Account
Number 17-5100; and authorization for execution of contract (CO
96-038) for the Roof Replacement of the 9th Street Corporate Yard
and Public Ubrary, to be funded from approved RDA 1996/96 funds,
Account Number 13-5100 (Bid to open June 13, 1996).
Approval to award and authorization for execution of Professional
Services Agreement (CO 96-039) for Surveying for the Haven
Avenue Storm Drain Improvement Project, located from Deer Creek
Channel to Base Line Road, with Associated Engineers, in the
amount of $33,055.00 (original proposal plus 10% contingency)to
be funded proportionately from Measure I Funds Account Nos. 32-
4637-9027 and 32-4637-9537, SB140 Funds Account No. 35-
46379027 and City Drainage Fund No. 23-4637-9537.
Approval to award and authorization for execution of contract (CO
96-040) for the Jersey Boulevard Storm Drain and Street
Improvements, from Haven Avenue east to the railroad spur, to be
funded from Proposition 111 Funds Account No. 10-4637-9505,
SB140 Funds Account No. 35-4637-9505, Measure I Fund Account
No. 32-4637-9505 and AD82-1R Account No. 83-4637-6028.
77
78
91
93
95
96
97
City Council Agenda
June 19, 1996
23.
Approval to accept the Touch Pad System Constructed in East and
West Beryl Parks, Contract No. 95-014, as Complete, Release the
Certificate of Deposit deposited in lieu of Retention and authorize the
City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion.
RESOLUTION NO. 96-101
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR
THE TOUCH PAD SYSTEM CONSTRUCTED IN
EAST AND WEST BERYL PARKS, CONTRACT
NO. 95-014, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF
A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
98
99
E. CONSENT ORDINANCES
The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first
reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non-
controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time
without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be
removed for discussion.
CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND
INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 96-01
WOHL/RANCHO PARTNERS - A request to amend the Industrial
Area Specific Plan to create a Community Commercial designation
for 14.45 acres generally located on the south side of Foothill
Boulevard between Spruce and Elm Avenues - APN: 208-352-62
through 69.
ORDINANCE NO. 554 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL AREA
SPECIFIC PLAN TEXT FOR 14.45 ACRES OF
LAND LOCATED SOUTH OF FOOTHILL
BOULEVARD, NORTH OF EUCALYPTUS
AVENUE, EAST OF SPRUCE AVENUE, AND
WEST OF ELM AVENUE, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 208-
352-62 THROUGH 69
CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE REPEALING AND ADDING
CHAPTER 9.24 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING
MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENTS ('LEGAL WORDING CHANGES
ONLY)
100
City Council Agenda
June 19, 1996
ORDINANCE' NO. 555 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, REPEALING CHAPTER 9.24 OF
TITLE 9 AND ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 9.24 TO
TITLE 9 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO MASSAGE
TECHNICIANS, MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENTS
AND SIMILAR BUSINESSES
CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE
9 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE BY
ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 9.30 AND PROHIBITING LOITERING
BY MINORS
ORDINANCE NO. 556 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 9 OF THE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE BY
ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 9.30 AND
PROHIBITING LOITERING BY MINORS
104
131
F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public
hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive
public testimony.
No Items Submitted.
G. PUBLIC HEARINGS
The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements..
The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony.
No Items Submitted.
H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
The following items do not legally require any public testimony,
although the Chair may open the meeting for public input.
No Items Submitted.
City Council Agenda
June 19, 1996
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
The following items have been requested by the City Council for
discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair may
open the meeting for public input.
CONSIDERATION OF RECOMMENDATION OF NAME FOR THE
NORTHEAST COMMUNITY PARK SITE
o
CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE PROCESS FOR FILLING
LIBRARY FOUNDATION MEMBERS
CONSIDERATION OF RECOMMENDATION TO FILL LIBRARY
BOARD VACANCIES
136
140
144
J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to
discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this
meeting, only identified for the next meeting.
K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
This is the time and place for the general public to address the City
Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue
not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive
testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are
to be limited to five minutes per individual.
Request by Ryan Conner to discuss traffic safety near Alta Loma
High School.
145
L. ADJOURNMENT
I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my
designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda
was posted on June 13, 1996, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting
per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive.
May 15, 1996
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Regular Meetin~
A. CALL TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, May 15, 1996, in the
Coundl Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.
The meeting was called to order at 7:26 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander.
Present were Councilmembers: Paul Biane, James Curatalo, Rex Gutierrez, Diane Williams, and Mayor
William J. Alexander.
Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City
Manager; Unda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Manager; Rick Gomez, Community Development Director; Brad
Buller, City Planner; Larry Henderson, Principal Planner; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Shintu Bose, Deputy City
Engineer; Dave Blevins, Public Works Maintenance Manager; Cindy Hackett, Associate Engineer; Bob
Zetterberg, Integrated Waste Coordinator; Bill Makshanoff, Building Official; Robert Dominguez, Administrative
Services Director; Susan Stark, Finance Officer; Ingrid Blair, GIS Supervisor; Jim Frost, City Treasurer; Diane
O'Neal, Management Analyst II; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; and Debra
J. Adams, City Clerk.
B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
B1. Presentation of a Proclamation Declaring the Week of May 19 through May 25, 1996 as National Public
Works Week.
Mayor Alexander presented the Proclamation to Dave Blevins, Public Works Maintenance Manager.
Dave Blevins thanked the Council and the maintenance workers who work so hard for the residents of the City
to make this a better place to live.
B2. Presentation to the Award Winners of Waste Prevention Week Essay and Colodng Contest.
Mayor Alexander and Bob Zetterberg, Integrated Waste Coordinator, presented the awards to the students.
C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
No communications were made from the public.
City Council Minutes
May 15, 1996
Page 2
D. CONSENT CALENDAR
Jack Lam, City Manger, stated that with regard to Item D14 there was a clarification that the contract was being
awarded to Calfon Construction Incorporated per the memorandum distributed this evening.
D1. Approval of Minutes: March 20, 1996
April 17, 1996
D2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 4/24196 and 5/1/96; and Payroll ending 4/18/96 for the total
amount of $1,608,441.03.
D3. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of April 30, 1996.
D4. Alcoholic Beverage Applicatjon for On-Sale Beer and Wine for Burgers 4-U, Louis Williams, Jr., 10707
Town Center Drive, Suite 110.
D5. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On-Sale Beer and Wine for A Chen's Restaurant, Chuan Chuan
Chang and Weibin Chen, 9799 D Base Line Road.
D6. Approval to amend Fiscal Year 1995/96 Appropriations.
D7. Approval of the Environmental Initial Study, Parts I and II for the proposed Metrolink Corridor
Beautification Project at locations along the Metrolink Corridor between Archibald Avenue and Milliken Avenue,
and issuance of a Categorical Exemption therefore.
RESOLUTION NO. 96-065
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY
AND ISSUANCE OF A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FOR THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA METROLINK CORRIDOR BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT BETWEEN
ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND MILLIKEN AVENUE
DS. Approval of Landmark Designation 96-01 - SANBAG -- A request to designate an existing residence
and accessory structures (Sam and Alfreda Maloof residence and workshop - National Register eligible),
located at 9553 Highland Avenue - APN: 202-101-18. Related files: Landmark Alteration Permit 96-01,
Conditional Use Permit 96-09, and Design Review 96-03.
RESOLUTION NO. 96-066
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING HISTORIC LANDMARK 96-01, TO
DESIGNATE THE MALOOF RESIDENCE AND WORKSHOPS, LOCATED AT 9553
HIGHLAND AVENUE, AS A LANDMARK, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF - APN: 202-101-18
D9. Approval to execute a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for DR 95-08, located
at 5550 Crooked Creek Drive, APN: 1074-171-21, submitted by Thomas Aaron Gifford and Jodi Ann Gifford.
City Council Minutes
May 15, 1996
Page 3
RESOLUTION NO. 96-067
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT
CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM THOMAS AARON GIFFORD AND
JODI ANN GIFFORD AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND THE CITY CLERK TO
SIGN THE SAME
D10. Approval to execute Program Supplement Nos. 012, 013, 014, 015,016, 017 and 019 (CO 96-017,
96-018, 96-019, 96-020, 96-021, 96-022 and 96-023) to Local Agency-State Master Agreement No. SLTPP-
5420 for the State-Local Transportation Partnership Program between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the
State of California for the improvement of podions of Base Line Road, Fourth Street, Hermosa Avenue, Milliken
Avenue, Hellman Avenue and Jersey Boulevard. Reimbursable Funding from the Supplement Agreement
shall be deposited to the SB140 Account.
RESOLUTION NO. 96-068
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND SIGNING OF
PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NOS. 012,013, 014, 015, 016, 017 AND 019 TO LOCAL
AGENCY-STATE MASTER AGREEMENT NO. SLTPP-5420 FOR THE STATE-
LOCAL TRANSPORTATION PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM FOR THE IMPROVEMENT
OF PORTIONS OF BASE LINE ROAD, FOURTH STREET, HERMOSA AVENUE,
MILLIKEN AVENUE, HELLMAN AVENUE AND JERSEY BOULEVARD
D11. Approval to execute an Agreement (CO 96-024) with San Bernardino County Foodbank to continue
to serve as a distribution site for U.S.D.A. commodities.
D12. Approval to execute a Professional Services Agreement (CO 96-025) with Austin-Foust Associates for
updating of the City Traffic Model and Transportation Fee Schedule. Project to be funded from Account Nos.
32-4637-9109 and 09-4637-8780 for $30,000.00.
D13. Approval to execute a Cooperative Agreement (CO 96-026) between the City of Rancho Cucamonga
and San Bernardino County Transportation Authority for the funding of the Haven Avenue Street and Storm
Drain Improvement Project from Deer Creek Channel to Base Line Road, and authorizing the Mayor to sign
same.
RESOLUTION NO. 96-069
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROViNG AND EXECUTING THE COOPERATIVE
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE SAN
BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (SAN BAG) FOR THE
FUNDING OF THE DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, AND CONTRACT
ADMINISTRATION FOR THE HAVEN AVENUE STREET AND STORM DRAIN
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FROM DEER CREEK CHANNEL TO BASE LINE ROAD
D14. Approval to award and authorization for execution of contract (CO 96-027) for Haven Avenue Storm
Drain and Street Improvements, from Deer Creek Channel to Base Line Road, to be funded from SB140 Funds
Account No. 35-4637-9027 and Measure I Funds Account Nos. 32-4637-9027 and 32-4637-9537.
City Council Minutes
May 15, 1996
Page 4
D15. Approval to award and authorization for execution of contract (CO 96-028) for the Replacement of
Cobblestone Curb along the east side of Etiwanda Avenue, to Camino Irvine Company, in the amount of
$48,970.57 (44,581.70 plus 10% contingency) to be funded from Beautification Funds Account No. 21-4647-
8822.
D16. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and Ordering the Annexation
to Landscape Maintenance Distdct No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for CUP 95-15,
located on the north side of Arrow Route, east of Rochester Avenue, submitted by Howard D. Chastain.
RESOLUTION NO. 96-070
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR CUP 95-15
RESOLUTION NO. 96-071
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN
TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR CUP 95-15
D17. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and Ordering the Annexation
to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for CUP 95-19,
located at 11167 White Birch Place, east of Elm Avenue, submitted by Regis Contractors, L.P.
RESOLUTION NO. 96-072
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR CUP 95-19
RESOLUTION NO. 96-073
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN
TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR CUP 95-19
D18. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13759, located on the west side of
Haven Avenue south of Victoria Street, submitted by Fu Mai Limited.
RESOLUTION NO. 96-074
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13759
D19. Approval to Release Bonds and Notice of Completion for CUP 93-13, located on the east side of
Hermosa Avenue, south of Eighth Street.
Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $ 88,000.00
No. 172602S
City Council Minutes
May 15, 1996
Page 5
RESOLUTION NO. 96-075
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR
CUP 93-13 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR
THE WORK
MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Curatalo to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports
contained in the Consent Calendar, Motion carried unanimously, 5-0.
E. CONSENT ORDINANCES
No items were submitted.
F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
F1. CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 95-16 - SACRED HEART CHURCH -Appeal
of the Planning Commission's approval of the bell schedule for a proposed church and school facility in the
Very Low Residential designation (1-2 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the
west side of Etiwanda Avenue, between Summit and Highland Avenues - APN: 225-171-12, 20, 22 and 23.
Staff report presented by Brad Buller, City Planner.
Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council were:
Mike Cockrell stated he is one of the few residents that was notified for the January 24, 1996 Planning
Commission meeting. He stated he did not feel it was noticed properly. He stated he had conducted
a survey that was presented at the Planning Commission workshop. He continued to state he had
moved here because of the quiet he was expecting to have in the Etiwanda area. He asked that the
Council find that this facility is not in the best interest of the City and that the bells are not allowed as
per the Etiwanda Specific Plan.
James Markman, City Attorney, clarified that both of the appeals are about the bell schedule only.
Jim Frost, 12996 Victoda Avenue, stated he was part of the Etiwanda Specific Plan Advisory
Committee, and that Etiwanda is not the sleepy community it once was, He stated he felt the Planning
Commission did a good job in reaching a compromise. He asked for the Council to accept the
Planning Commission's decision.
Father Gaglia, Pastor of Sacred Heart Church, stated the residents near the church and the Village
of Heritage are appealing the restricted use of the bells for the church. He talked about the
compromises they agreed to make to be within the City's noise ordinance. He asked that the Council
accept their proposal. He stated that page 55 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan does state there will be
churches and schools for this area. He asked for those to stand that support their proposal. (The
appropriate audience stood.) He asked that the Council approve their appeal as so submitted.
City Council Minutes
May 15, 1996
Page 6
Doug Peterson, 6771 Blue Gum, stated had he known when he bought his house that they were going
to have a bell tower so close to him, he never would have bought it. He stated he did not agree with
the bell schedule. He asked that those that live within one quarter mile of the proposed church to
stand. (The appropriate audience stood.) He asked that the Planning Commission be given direction
to go back and eliminate all of the bells.
Larry Matejka stated he filed the appeal and that he did not feel the residents were notified properly.
He felt the bell schedule was unreasonable to be dnging as much as they have been approved to ring.
He felt the Council was going to have to mitigate this issue.
David Berger, Sr., stated they have been members of the Sacred Heart Church for some years now
and felt the bells must continue to ring.
Shelly Cockrell, resident of Elivvanda for three and a half years, stated she has a problem with the bells
because she is Jewish and does not want to listen to bells for another religion. She pointed out that
St. Peter and St. Paul does not ring bells. She did not feel this should be allowed so that she is a
prisoner in her own house. She stated she is also concerned about the traffic.
Cathy Bazaki stated she felt the bells have always been a tradition in the neighborhood. She stated
there is a lot of traffic already in this area from the schools. She stated she is a wedding coordinator
for the Sacred Heart Church and is concerned about all of the horns honking from the wedding.
Rick Andonigas stated just because the bells are a tradition for Catholics, it is not a tradition for
everyone else. He stated people that mow their lawns are not allowed to do this late at night and did
not think the bells should be allowed.
Gina Johnson quoted Justice Black of the Supreme Court. She told about the compromises the
church is willing to make with the bell ringing. She felt if they are within the boundaries of the
Ordinance, what is the purpose of stopping them from ringing.
Barbara Foot stated she would like to hear the bells. She stated she lives in Etiwanda and deserves
the right to hear the bells.
JoAnn Hunt stated she does not want to have to hear the bells and did not feel she should have to be
a prisoner of her own home. She felt this would disturb the quiet in her neighborhood. She also was
concerned about the traffic.
Don Delugas stated he was notified of the first hearing. He felt the noticing was not done properly. He
felt it should go back to the Planning Commission.
James Markman, City Attorney, stated every City has a 300 foot noticing requirement. He agreed this did not
reach a lot of people because of the lot sizes in this area.
Brad Buller, City Planner, stated the site was also posted and notices were mailed. He stated there was a traffic
analysis done also. He felt the Planning Commission should have gotten more input from the local residents.
Jeanene Tibbits, Shasta Drive, stated because of the position of the church on the lot and the bell
tower, and because people are running their air conditioning units most of the time and with
grandfather clocks chiming, she did not think people would really hear the bells that much. She really
did not think the traffic would be that much of a problem.
City Council Minutes
May 15, 1996
Page 7
Cedlia Fink stated she did not think the bells should be dnging each day. She felt special occasions
and on Sunday was acceptable. She felt her rights will be taken away from her and that she would be
trapped in her own house. She felt no one took her opinion into consideration, and felt people would
not have any peace and quiet.
Tammy Ness and Christina Braden (students) felt someone was going to have to be unhappy no
matter what the decision. They felt everyone needed to compromise.
Brenda Glasco of Etiwanda stated she does not want to hear the bells after she has commuted four
hours each day. She did not want to have to hear them dnging every hour. She also commented that
she did not receive any notification on this matter.
Casey Woodbury, Cherokee, felt the bells dnging all of the time was not good and that it would disrupt
her family.
Becky Fosten stated she liked to hear the bells ringing.
Larry Lucasic, Cherokee Road, felt there was a safety issue near the church because of the traffic.
He felt there needed to be a compromise for the bell ringing.
John Baker, student, stated he did not feel there was really an issue if the church was within the law.
Ed Baginero stated he is a fireman and gets called out at the fire station by bells. He stated he did not
think he would want to have to hear this at home also because he would be thinking he was supposed
to go to work.
Mark Edder, Cherokee, stated nobody is here to punish the church. He did not think the bells should
be allowed to ring every 15 minutes.
Berry Samboli, Blue Gum Court, stated nobody is against the church, but only something they believe
in. He did not think the neighbors should be disturbed by the bells and felt their privacy should be
respected.
AI Tibbits, Shasta Drive, stated he was not notified about this issue. He felt the sound from the bells
should be put into context with all of the other noises of the neighborhood.
Thera being no further response, the public hearing was closed.
Councilmember Curatalo felt this group was definitely divided and the City was in the middle. He stated this
was well debated, but that he agreed with the Planning Commission's compromise.
Councilmember Biane stated this was an emotional issue. He stated he would not have a problem with hearing
the bells ring every 15 minutes. He stated the Planning Commission has worked very hard to get this
compromise and that he would agree with the Planning Commission's decision.
Councilmember Gutierrez stated there is a lot of noise in this area that people complain about. He stated he
finds the bells now ringing at the church across from the Price Club very peaceful. He felt with the property
being posted that people in the area knew about the church going in. He stated if he votes no, it is because he
does not feel it is right to do any regulating of the bells. He stated if he votes yes, the bells will be ringing. He
felt the Planning Commission's decision was valid, but that he does agree with Commissioner Melcher and did
not think the Council should decide how to regulate the bells.
Councilmember Williams asked if the bell schedule was part of the CUP.
City Council Minutes
May 15, 1996
Page 8
Brad Buller, City Planner, stated yes.
Councilmember Williams asked if this is a problem in the future, can it be brought back.
Brad Buller, City Planner, stated that any condition can be evaluated if there is a problem.
Councilmember Williams stated she has a problem with the 6:00 a.m. start for the ringing of the bells.
Brad Buller, City Planner, stated that can be changed if the Council would like it to.
James Markman, City Attorney, stated this can be checked like any other use, that it is not considered a
freedom of religion issue. He pointed out that the check can also be used for a possible modification of the
CUP.
Mayor Alexander stated he agreed with Councilmember Gutierrez if this is really an issue for the Council to be
considering. He stated he did not feel there is a way to make everyone happy on this. He stated he would like
to see it brought back for review in six months after the church is built for an evaluation. He felt notification
boundaries should be extended to between 600 and 800 feet.
Councilmember Gutjerrez stated he is disappointed to hear people criticizing a religion which is different from
what they believe in. He stated he is making his decision with respect for this church and any other church.
RESOLUTION NO. 96-076
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE BELL SCHEDULE FOR
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 95-16, A CHURCH AND SCHOOL FACILITY, IN
THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATION (1-2 DWELLING UNITS PER
ACRE) OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF
ETIWANDA AVENUE, BETWEEN SUMMIT AND HIGHLAND AVENUES, AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 225-171-12, 20, 22 AND 23
MOTION: Moved by Curatalo, seconded by Alexander to accept the Planning Commission's decision and to
return the matter to the Council for review in six months after the church is completed. Motion carried 3-2
(Willlares and Gutierrez no).
A recess was taken at 9:27 p.m.
The Council reconvened at 9:45 p.m. with all Councilmembers present.
F2. CONSIDERATION OF CONDITION USE PERMIT 96-04 - FRANCIS BALCHAK - An appeal of the
Planning Commission's denial of a request to establish a 1,075 square foot video arcade and a 2,207 square
foot pool room in conjunction with a 2,100 square foot restaurant within the Neighborhood Commercial (NC)
shopping center located at the southwest corner of Hellman Avenue and Base Line Road - APN: 208-202-17.
(TO BE CONTINUED TO JUNE 5, 1996)
Brad Buller, City Planner, stated there is a request to continue this item to June 5, 1996.
MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Williams to continue Item F2 to June 5, 1996. Motion carried
unanimously, 5-0.
City Council Minutes
May 15, 1996
Page 9
F3. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 15732 - LEWIS
HOMES -Appeal of a condition of approval regarding school facility financing for a proposed subdivision of 33
single family homes on 9.46 acres of land in the Community Service designation, located at the northwest
corner of Base Line Road and Etiwanda Avenue - APN: 277-522-05, 07, and 08. (TO BE CONTINUED TO
JUNE 5, 1996)
MOTOIN: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Biane to continue Item F3 to June 5, 1996. Motion carded
unanimously, 5-0.
F4. CONSIDERATION OF THE FINAL DRAFT ANNUAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
FUNDING ALLOCATIONS FOR FY 1996-97 - The review of the Federally required Annual Action Plan for
Fiscal Year 1996/97, including the final selection of projects for the Community Development Block Grant
annual application, based on an estimate of $1,024,000 (current year's allocation). Staff report presented by
Larry Henderson, Principal Planner.
Councilmember Gutierrez stated he felt this was a good start to begin this program.
Councilmember Biane thanked Larry Henderson for his work on this project and thought this was a good
program.
Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council was:
Nacho Gracia, of Northtown Housing Development Corporation, thanked the Council and the Ad Hoc
Task Force for their work on this.
Steve Baer, 7599 Cerrito Rojo, thanked the Council and Task Force for considering their project.
There being no further response, the public hearing was closed.
MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Biane to approve the final dral~ annual Community Development
Block Grant Funding Allocations for Fiscal Year 1996/97. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0.
ITEMS F5, F6, AND F7 WERE CONSIDERED AT THE SAME TIME.
F5. CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT AND RESOLUTION FOR
THE LEVY OF THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT
DISTRICT (PD-85) FOR FISCAL YEAR 1996197. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE IS PROPOSED
Staff report presented by Joe O'Neil, City Engineer.
Jack Lam, City Manager, pointed out that the City is very proud of the program for the installation of the water
sensor devices. He stated over the years it has shown to produce quite a bit of savings while yet providing the
adequate amount of water for the parkways. He stated the City is in the last phases of installation for this
program. He stated it has really helped stabilize the Districts and that this is the fourth year which these Districts
have not been increased. He reported that they are at the "A" level of service. He brought to the Council's
attention that several years ago they had gone down to a much lower level of service. He stated the
City Council Minutes
May 15, 1996
Page 10
rates have stabilized as of four years ago. He stated with the Jan/is initiative that will be on the ballot in
November, who knows what challenges this will produce in regards to being able to keep up with growth in the
future as far as maintenance in the Districts. He stated this will be a future challenge.
Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was
closed.
Councilmember Williams asked if we could check into retro~tting the mowed turf area so there is not such a
high maintenance cost.
Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated they are currently working on something for Haven Avenue. He stated it is
not only labor intensive, but uses a lot of water.
Councilmember Gutierrez stated he is happy with the Engineering staff for all of their hard work.
RESOLUTION NO. 96-077
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN
THE PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD-85 (HERITAGE
AND RED HILL COMMUNITY PARKS)
MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Gutierrez to approve Resolution No. 96-077. Motion carried
unanimously, 5-0.
F6. CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT AND RESOLUTION FOR
THE LEVY OF THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS
NOS. 1,2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 FOR FISCAL YEAR 1996/97. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE IS
PROPOSED
SEE ITEM F5 FOR DISCUSSION.
RESOLUTION NO. 96-078
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8
PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972
MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Gutierrez to approve Resolution No. 96-078. Motion carried
unanimously, 5-0.
F7. CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT AND RESOLUTION FOR
THE LEVY OF THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1,
2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1997/97. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE IS
PROPOSED
SEE ITEM F5 FOR DISCUSSION.
City Council Minutes
May 15, 1996
Page 11
RESOLUTION NO. 96-079
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8
PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE AND STREET LIGHTING ACT OF 1972
MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Gutierrez to approve Resolution No. 96-079. Motion carded
unanimously, 5-0.
G. PUBLIC HEARINGS
No items were submitted.
H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
H1. DISCUSSION OF SKATEBOARDING CONSIDERATIONS AS PRESENTED BY THE PARK AND
RECREATION COMMISSION Staff report presented by Suzanne Ota, Community Services Manager.
Mark Whitehead, Chairman of the Park and Recreation Commission, stated they have done a lot of work on
this. He talked about the other skateboard parks they have checked out in other cities. He stated the City
Council was given information from the City of Santa Rosa about their skateboard park. He stated they would
like to continue working on this matter by possibly setting up a Task Force to involve the community on
developing this project.
Bruce Ann Hahn, Park and Recreation Commissioner, stated she thought Temecula has a video on their
skateboard park. She stated at the CPRS Conference in San Diego she went to a session on fund raising. She
stated she went to Active, a store in the Terra Vista Town Center, where they sell all types of skateboard
equipment. She stated she learned by talking with the owner of this store that the manufacturers of all of this
equipment will sponsor a skater. The owner also told her he thought the manufacturers might be a good
source of fund raising for a skateboard park. He said they were very excited about the possibility of a
skateboard park.
Coundlmember Biane thanked the Park and Recreation Commission for their work on this. He realized they
had done a lot of work.
Councilmember Gutierrez asked if Marcus Solomon had been contacted.
Bruce Ann Hahn, Commissioner, stated he was the one that suggested that funds be sought out from the crime
bill.
Councilmember Williams felt they also needed a hockey rink to be included in this project.
ACTION: Park and Recreation Commission to continue pursuing this matter.
City Council Minutes
May 15, 1996
Page 12
H2. UPDATE FROM ROUTE 30 AD HOC TASK FORCE Staff report presented by Joe O'Neil, City
Engineer.
ACTION: Report received and filed.
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
No items were submitted.
J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
J1. Councilmember Williams stated she would like clarification on the notification requirements for public
hearing items.
Brad Buller, City Planner, stated he would provide this information in a memo to the Council.
K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
No communications were made from the public.
L. ADJOURNMENT
MOTOIN: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Williams to adjourn to an Executive Session to discuss Labor
Negotiations per Government Code Section 54957.6 to give Robert Dominguez, Administrative Services
Director, direction in regards to the Meet and Confer Process. Executive Session will adjourn to a Joint Meeting
with the Planning Commission to be held Wednesday, May 29, 1996, 6:30 p.m. in the Tri-Communities
Conference Room at the CMc Center. Motion carded unanimously, 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 10:21 p.m.
No action was taken in Executive Session.
Respectfully submitted,
Debra J. Adams, CMC
City Clerk
Approved:
May 30, 1996
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT MINUTES
Adjourned Meetin.q
A. CALL TO ORDER
An adjourned meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council, Redevelopment Agency and Fire Protection
District was held on Thursday, May 30, 1996, in the Tri-Communities Conference Room of the Civic Center,
located at 10500 CMc Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 5:38
p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander.
Present were Council/Agency/Boardmembers: Paul Biane, James Curatalo, Rex Gutierrez, Diane Williatns,
and Mayor William J. Alexander.
Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Agency Manager; Bob
Dominguez, Administrative Services Director; Susan Stark, Finance Officer; Sandy Ramirez, Resource Services
Supervisor; Chuck Varney, Sr. Business License Technician; Rose Colum, Accountant; Dan Keebler, Data
Processing Manager; Jim Frost, City Treasurer; Deborah Clerk, Library Manager; Rick Gomez, Community
Development Director; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer; Dave Blevins, Public
Works Maintenance Manager; Joe Stofa, Associate Engineer; Brad Buller, City Planner; Marti Higgins, Disaster
Preparedness Manager; Suzanne eta, Community Services Manager; Captain Ron Bieberdorf and Lieutenant
Joe Henry, Rancho Cucamenga Police Department; Chief L. Dennis Michael and Alex Ahumada, Administrative
Services Officer, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager;
Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst II; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk.
Jack Lam, City Manager, presented a City tile to Bob Dominguez, Administrative Services Director, who was
going to the City of Los Alamitos to be their new City Manager. He thanked Mr. Dominguez for his service to
the community and all of his hard work and dedication.
Mayor Alexander presented Mr. Dominguez with a Proclamation recognizing all of his hard work and service
to the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
Bob Dominguez, Administrative Services Director, thanked the City Council, Jack Lam and City staff for the
opportunity to have worked in the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
Councilmember Gutierrez also thanked Mr. Dominguez for all of his good work in the City.
City Council/RedevelopmentJ
Fire Protection District Minutes
May 30, 1996
Page 2
B. ITEM OF DISCUSSION
B1. DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED BUDGETS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1996/97
Jack Lam, City Manager, made a presentation of the City, Redevelopment Agency and Fire District budgets.
(The overheads used for this presentation are on file in the City Clerk's office.)
Councilmember Gutierrez inquired if there has been complaints about the County's animal control service,
because if there has been the City should have a say in the staffing for the animal shelter.
Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager, stated the details are now being discussed and that could be
brought up. He stated he would point out that Rancho Cucamonga has a high level of expectation for customer
service. He stated they have a lot of volunteers in the City to work on this project also.
Councilmember Gutierrez stated he has a petition to submit on behalf of the Rancho Cucamonga Friends of
Animals who are in favor of the animal shelter. He further stated he would make copies for the rest of the
Council and make this part of the record.
Councilmember Williams stated she shared the enthusiasm for the animal shelter and the reduction of the utility
tax.
Councilmember Curatalo stated he felt it was great news that the budget was balanced. He stated he would
like to see an increase in revenues, but knew that would come in future years.
Jack Lam, City Manager, pointed out that the utility tax will continue to disappear over the years and that the
increase in revenues will help it to disappear sooner.
Councilmember Biane stated he noticed that there was not a sales tax revenue increase in the budget and
wondered why.
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated the concern was how the Mills Stores would affect our revenue, but that
hopefully Home Depot and other new stores would help with this.
Mayor Alexander stated it was great that Central Park would be getting started. He also mentioned how
wonderful it was that the Senior Center would take place.
Councilmember Williams mentioned that page 8 of the RDA budget points out the dues for the Chamber, and
asked for clarification on the amount.
Jack Lam, City Manager, clarified that part of the Chamber dues are paid out of the Redevelopment Agency
budget and part from the City's budget, totaling $10,000.
Councilmember Williams asked if this could be increased by using marketing money. She stated she would
like the Council to consider raising the total amount to $12,000 annually.
Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public comments. Addressing the City Council were:
Mr. Lansdale, Sapphire, felt the City should have its own Police Department. He felt the utility tax was
killing him and felt it should be cut in half. He felt the City needed someone to bring business into the
City. He stated he would like to see the City get rid of the utility tax altogether. He also pointed out he
felt the Fire District budget was too high.
Ci~ Council/Redevelopmen~
Fire Protection District Minutes
May 30,1996
Page 3
Emanuel Ramirez of Etiwanda, felt Eljwanda was not connected with some of the programs in the City.
He felt some of the programs should be consolidated so that all of the marketing material is paid for
and handled by one source. He stated he did not feel the City was getting good quality contract
se~ces. He pointed out he did not agree with the utility tax, but would like to see what he is getting for
paying it. He stated he did not understand where the different accounts came from, and felt he was
in the dark where the budget was concerned.
Mayor Alexander stated Mr. Ramirez could come in and sit down with staff to get all of his questions answered.
Mr. Ramirez stated he would like someone from the City to come and talk to the people in his
neighborhood and explain things.
Coundlmember Curatalo pointed out the good cdme rate the City has. He told that the City's crime rating went
from 11 th safest to 7th safest in the nation.
Mayor Alexander stated he would like to sit down with him to explain how things are done in the City and to help
answer some of his questions.
Mr. Ramirez asked what is the goal for parks per 1000 people.
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated it is five acres of park land per 1000 people. He pointed out if residential
development picks up then it would help to get more parks built.
Mayor Alexander stated the City is also working with the school system for park development. He stated once
a park is built, it does cost a lot of money to operate it and maintain it.
Councilmember Williams stated a lot of the marketing material is paid for by grants.
Valerie Card, President of the Friendship for Animals thanked the Council for their support of this
project.
Councilmember Biane stated he also suppods the opening of the animal shelter.
C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
C1.'
Roger Sperto, Rancho Cucamonga Visitors Bureau, distributed material about what the Visitors Bureau
has to offer. He talked abut the POW WOW 1996 Sight Seeing Tour scheduled for June 9, 1996. He
stated he hoped the work they do will bring revenue into the City.
City Council/RedevelopmentJ
Fire Protection District Minutes
May 30, 1996
Page 4
D. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Moved by Gu~errez, seconded by Williams for the City Council to adjourn to June 5, 1996, 4:00 p.m.
in the Tri-Communities Conference Room of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Ddve, Rancho
Cucamonga, California, for the purpose of meeting jointly with the Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation,
and forthe Redevelopment Agency and Fire Protection District to adjourn to June 6, 1996, 5:30 p.m. in the Tri-
Communities Conference Room of the CMc Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga,
California, for a budget workshop. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 6:47 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Debra J. Adams, CMC
City Clerk
Approved by City Council:
Approved by Redevelopment Agency:
Approved by Fire Protection District:
June 6,1996
CITY OFRANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCILMINUTES
REDEVELOPMENTAGENCY MINUTES
FIREPROTECTION DISTRICT MINUTES
Adiourned Meetin.el
A. CALL TO ORDER
An adjourned meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council, Redevelopment Agency and Fire Protection
District was held on Thursday, June 6, 1996, in the Tri Communities Room of the Civic Center, located at 10500
Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 5:35 p.m. by Mayor
William J. Alexander.
Present were Council/Agency/Boardmembers: Paul Biane, James Curatalo, Rex Gutierrez, Diane Williams
(arrived at 5:54 p.m.), and Mayor William J. Alexander.
Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager; Linda D. Daniels,
Redevelopment Agency Manager; Susan Stark, Finance Officer; Sandy Ramirez, Resource Services
Supervisor; Ingrid Blair, GIS Supervisor; Rose Colum, Accountant; Jim Frost, City Treasurer; Deborah Clark,
Library Manager; Rick Gomez, Community Development Director; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Shintu Bose,
Deputy City Engineer; Dave Blevins, Public Works Maintenance Manager; Joe Stofa, Associate Engineer; Cindy
Hackett, Associate Engineer; Brad Buller, City Planner; Bill Makshanoff, Building Official; Suzanne Ota,
Community Services Manager; Kathy Sorensen, Recreation Superintendent; Paula Pachon, Management
Analyst II; Captain Ron Bieberdorf and Lieutenant Joe Henry, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; Chief
L. Dennis Michael and Alex Ahumada, Administrative Services Officer, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection
District; Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager; Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst II; and Debra J.
Adams, City Clerk.
B. ITEM OF DISCUSSION
B1. DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED BUDGETS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1996/97
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated that at the last meeting the Council talked about allocating the Chamber
additional money, and added that Bill Holley, Executive Director for the Chamber, was present to talk about that.
He also mentioned that the Etiwanda Historical Society had sent a letter requesting $1,000 for the Chaffey
Garcia House for the monitored alarm system that was installed. He stated Route 66 representatives were
present to talk about a request for money also.
Bill Holley, Executive Director of the Chamber of Commerce, stated he and Jack Lam had talked and
that he had also talked to the Chamber's Board of Directors about the money from the City. He
reported that the Chamber is very delighted about the prospects of their future and that they want to
conduct themselves as a business. Mr. Holley added they are looking at things differently so that if the
City needs assistance or a service, they can check with the Chamber to provide that. He added they
are not looking to be subsidized by receiving any money from the City.
City Council/Redevelopment Agency/
Fire District Minutes
June 6, 1996
Page 2
The Council commended the Chamber for their new position.
Mr. Holley stated they are looking to help the City and will be happy to assist whenever possible.
Councilmember Gutierrez asked if Mr. Holley had any thoughts how they would generate revenue.
Mr. Holley stated their purpose is to serve their clients and that they are working on contacting all
businesses to notify them about this. He felt a strong business relationship between the Chamber and
the City would benefit both agencies.
Councilmember Gut~errez wondered how the Chamber would feel about such issues as the utility tax and if their
position would change this year compared to last year.
Mr. Holley stated the Board would act on issues as a body even though they may not all agree on all
of the issues.
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated he has had discussions with Councilmember Willlares to discuss this issue so
that she was aware of the Chamber's position. He also talked about the "Shop R.C." campaign.
Mayor Alexander stated even though there may have been differences of opinion with the Chamber, he does
respect their position.
Councilmember Williams arrived at 5:54 p.m.
Councilmember Biane suggested that there be a gateway from the I15 Freeway to the shopping area which
he thought would help the retailers.
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated staff could look into this and possibly redefine some of the dollars involved to
do this.
Jim Frost, Etiwanda Historical Society representative, stated they are requesting $1,000 to cover
monthly costs for a security system and dedicated phone line for the year.
Councilmember Gutierrez stated he supported this and felt the Council should approve this request.
Mayor Alexander stated he supported this also, but that he would like to find out about the API monitoring
system. He also asked that these types of requests be received by the Council earlier on in the budget process
instead of at the last minute.
Councilmember Biane stated he agreed with both Mayor Alexander and Councilmember Gutierrez.
Councilmember Curatalo stated he also agreed.
Derby Wheeler, Route 66 Visitors Center, stated they would propose that the Council give them $6,000
which would go towards paying for Mr. Lunde's volunteer time and other marketing ideas.
Mayor Alexander felt this information should come to the Council earlier than it did.
Mr. Wheeler distributed informational packets to the Council regarding his proposal.
City Council/Redevelopment Agency/
Fire District Minutes
June 6, 1996
Page 3
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated the staff has put a lot of thought and work into making this budget balanced
so that it meets the City's goals.
C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
No communication was made from the public.
D. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Biane to adjourn the City Council, Redevelopment Agency and
Fire Protenon District to Thursday, June 13, 1996, 5:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic
Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, to adopt the City and Redevelopment Agency budgets, and to
adopt the preliminary budget for the Fire Protection District. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. The meeting
adjourned at 6:05 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Debra J. Adams, CMC
City Clerk
Approved by City Council:
Approved by Redevelopment Agency:
Approved by Fire Protection District:
U~
~.v~tu
I--
I I I
N 0 N oo ~O~NN~O~ON~4 ~40~~~00
Z ·
,..JH · 0 -J
~ 0 e,JI,L ~ Oe-e t,uU,
I-- e., I-OH U .,~ UI--
o .. .. ~ ~, =,,o>> ,:, o..,
C~-,~' IXUJ IUUZZZ
Z
[
iLe, egJ
_I
t:
V
V
V
W
Z U
W
U
~
ZOWZ
~Z~HZ
v) I-- V)
uJ UJ 4[
::}
I,- N ~l U J t~ U,
O,.e.~ C2UJ I-- NJU.
~ z :2z,u-'a ,.,'s< ~ ez
0 H),t&t-- II,~,~OHO 1,,'vL,)QCUJ'v H-J~.:zOfk)'vl'z
U
_1
7 m uJ
OJZ I-- e,.,'
,(Z ,( ILIA":
e"4 Z
I.- e. I.~ .,J
,Jw~ · w, Z ,~),'Z'r
U~ZOZZ · ~II--
I-e'J~HUOI'.'IZ Ou~Ud""' m. OC
k")Z I w,JuJ.,J ,I Z
).,
~-,
I-
·
Z
· ·
I I
· ·
·
· ·
· ·
I ·
· ·
· ·
· I
· ·
I ·
· ·
·
· ·
· I
I I
· ·
· ·
I I
I1--1
I ·
i..vl
· I
· ·
·
I I
· I
I I
· ·
· I
· ·
I I
· ·
I I
· ·
I ·
· ·
· ·
I ·
I ·
· ·
·
· ·
· ·
I I
I ·
· ·
I I
· ·
I I
I ·
I ·
I ·
I ·
IO,.I
i1~,I
·
I ·
I ·
· ·
I ·
I ·
· ·
·
·
·
· I
I
I
I ·
· ·
· I
I ·
I I
|
I I
I I
I II
I I
e I
· ·
· ·
· ·
ii I
· ·
· ·
I I
I I
· ·
t
· ·
I- C2
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
l
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
· ·
I- I
[ I
t
· ·
,v ·
( I
·
·
·
I
·
·
II
·
IzI
·
I ·
·
· ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
I I
· ·
$ ·
·
I ·
I ·
I ·
· ·
i ·
I ·
· ·
I
· ·
· ·
· ·
I I
· ·
·
· II
I
· ·
· ·
·
· ·
· ·
I l
¥
· I
II ·
· I
·
i
· ·
· ·
I
· ·
N I
· ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
etul
· ·
·
~ ·
,J
I--
t,.I
I I I
U I I I I!tl
W
, 0 0 0
V V V
VtUV V
Vt~V V
ol 91 LU
H N ..d
( UJ
0, 3:
UJ V)
0C t'4 ~
g.i e~ UJ
(=) Z t.) I-,
~F, i-I "J'
.( I.- ~ UJ
2, ,x ~' ·
UJ eu gJ
I-- I- I--
V
V
V
I-.I
e..e
.r I-- .=J
I=1 IX
N W I--
W "1 1--
· tl~ ·
Z
I-
U
gJ
I--
O..
Z
D U
(=)
I.- (,) ·
I-I (C2 Z
·
~.~,
N
· ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
· I
· ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
I I
· ·
· I
! I
· ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
I ·
· ·
I ·
I I
· ·
· ·
· ·
·
IC) I
· ·
· ·
· ·
·
· ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
I ·
I ·
· ·
·
· ·
I
· I
· ·
· I
· I
Ic:)l
1o.I
I~1
·
i~e'l
IMJI
· ·
I I
· ·
· ·
· ·
I
· I
I
· ·
· ·
·
· ·
· ·
·
I ·
· ·
I
· I
· I
· ·
I
· l
· ·
· ·
· ·
·
· ·
· ·
· I
·
I-.I
IZlll
I
IlOll
· ·
000000~0
eeeweeee
~olO0~o00oo~O~loOoO0lo~hO~oOO~O~ooO~lNO
·
I.,.,e,
).
1-. c2
~zz~oZzwOZZozZ~Z~ ZDO~U~Z~O ~Zo 2OO~ ~ wOOO~2 Z~
U
V~
~D
· r ·
~C
~.B~
J
I-- C2
I-4
OC
C~k40.,
1.4
· I
· ·
· ·
I ·
·
· ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
~1 I
· ·
· el
Ihl
~1(I
%1 ·
~lel
~1 I
· ·
Zl I
I
I~1
I=1
· I
· ·
· ·
·
· ·
· ·
· ·
· I
· I
· ·
· ·
· ·
· I
· I
II
· I
· ·
· ·
I~1
I~1
I=1
· I
I ·
· I
· I
· ·
· ·
I I
· ·
· I
· ·
· ·
I I
· ·
I ·
· ·
I I
I ·
· I
· ·
· I
· I
· I
I I
I I
· ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
I ·
· ·
· I
· I
·
I(I
I>1
· ·
%
ifi
H
(J
· I'
· ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
"'|
· ·
· ·
,.l!
u.f I ·
0,1 I
· ·
IJ-I
% I ·
, · ·
tu · I
I-- · ·
¢ I ·
,.N · ·
· ·
121
· ·
· ·
· ·
I ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
·
· ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
|
· I
· I
· I
· ·
·
IZI
1,-41
· ·
·
I
· ·
·
I ·
I I
·
· ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
I ·
·
· I
· I
· ·
· ·
I
I ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
I ·
· ·
I ·
luJI
19.1
I
i~,1
Ic21
Itul
I~.1
· I
r p- p. p-.
A
A
o~~~oo~oooooooooo~~oo~oooo~oo~oo
~ Z
~0~
· ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
I ·
· ·
· ·
ml ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
-II
·
·
· ·
°"' ~ ~ ~ ' ~
%1~1
~1~1
· ·
--I I
~1 I
~1 ·
~1 I
GI I
· ·
ZI I
~, ~,~oo~~oo~oo~~oooo~~oo
% · l
~z~ · · z ZZ ~ ~ ZZ ~ Z
~ IUI m ~ ZZW~ZOZOO~O[OO~O ~Z~DO~Z~ ZZOOOOOW Z[
· ·
· ·
· ·
· , ~ j
| : J o ,
· I
I
t
V~
N
,J
I-
I V
Z ~O ~ ZZZ Zw ZZ~Z
Z
C~
U.
'% W
I-. Z ·
I-- I:~ I--
O. a,. Q t..) O. Z
Z I,- ),
I,-wwl-- U,U..J IL H e Z(J 6-,.v.
m 4Ju~44 'r~Ol&.JI-'~4N'v tuwwO
· e-/-;,) fJg,.,I I--,*-'IMILI3~W e,'Y.I
Z
II
oe/n/1996
CITY OF RANCK) CUCAMONGA p~ -
PORTFOLIO HASTER SUPe4ARY CITY
HAY 31, 1996 CASH
AVEPAGE --'YIELDTOHATURITY---
PERCENT OF AVERAGE DAYS TO 360 365
INVESTMENTS BOOK VAL~ PORTFOLIO TERN HATURITY EQUIVALENT EQUIVALDIT
Certificates of Deposit - Bank ...............$
Local Agency Investment Funds ................$
Federal Agency Issues - Coupon ...............$
Treasury Securities - Coupon .................$
Nortqage Backed Securities ...................$
Small Bus. Adm/Nisc~llaneons Agency ..........$
13,825,532.20 21.31 535 254 6.005 6.088
13,424,380.32 20.70 1 I 5.462 5.538
35,934,040.63 55.40 1,533 1,309 6.648 6.740
272,845.00 0.42 1,180 456 6.569 6.660
305,989.89 0.47 6,345 3,094 8.911 9.035
1,101,562.50 1.70 9,131 5,532 8.184 8.298
TOTAL INVES'fiiENTS and AVEPAGES .............$ 64,864,350.54 100.00% 1,153 890 6.302% 6.389%
CASH
Passbook/Checking Accounts ...................$ 948,615.00 1.973 2.000
(not included in yield calculations)
Accrued Interest at Purchase .................$ 22,626.69
TOTAL CASH and PURCI{A,~E INTEREST .............$ 971,241.69
TOTAL CASH amd I~TM~ ................. $ 65,835,592.23
MONTH ENDING FISCAL
TOTAL EARNINGS HAY 31 YEAR TO DATE
Current Year $ 338,202.31 $ 3,219,200.23
AVEPAGE DAILY I~U~x/eCE $ 65,693,733.88 $ 55,776,894.24
EFFECTIVE RATE OF REIq~RN 6.06% 6.27%
DATE
I certify that this report accurately reflects all City pooled investments and
is in comformity with the investment policy adopted August 16, 1995. A copy of
the investment policy is available in the Administrative Services Department.
The Investment Program herein shown provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to
meet next month's estimated expenditures.
06/11/1996 CITY O[ RAIlClIO LEA)KE~ ~ - 2
INVESTgENT PORTFOLIO DETAILS = INVESTI~3FrS CItY
!~Y 31, 1996 CASH
INVESTNENT AVERAGE PORaASE STATED === YTM--- NATURITY DAYS
NUIeEN ISSUER BALANCE DATE BOX VALUE FACE VALUE ~ VALUE RATE 360 365 DATE TO ~T
CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT - BANK
00937 FOOTHILL INDEP BANK 04/06/95 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 6.950 6.950 7.047 04/09/97 312
00930 GREAT WESTERN 02/15/95 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 6.900 6.900 6.996 08/16/96 76
00955 GREAT WESTERN 08/21/95 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 5.650 5.650 5.728 08/21/96 81
00965 GREAT WESTERN 01/25/96 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 5.050 5.050 5.120 01/29/97 242
00966 GREAT WESTERN 03/04/96 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 4.700 4.700 4.765 03/04/97 276
00970 GREAT WESTERN 03/12/96 1,810,532.20 1,810,532.20 1,810,532.20 4.800 4.800 4.867 09/17/96 108
00924 SANleA 12/28/94 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 7.250 7.250 7.351 12/27/96 209
00933 SANWA 02/23/95 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 6.920 6.920 7.016 02/24/97 268
00945 SANWA 05/02/95 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 6.410 6.410 6.499 05/02/97 335
00954 SANWA 07/31/95 1,515,000.00 1,515,000.00 1,515,000.00 5.480 5.480 5.556 07/30/96 59
00958 SANWA 11/22/95 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 5.600 5.600 5.678 11/26/96 178
00975 SANWA 05/22/96 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 6.000 6.000 6.083 05/26/98 724
SUBTOT~ and AVEPAGES 12,809,403.17 13,825,532.20 13,825,532.20 13,825,532.20
6.005 6.088 254
LOCAL AGENCY INVESTNENT FUNDS
00005 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND
00804 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND
S~TOTALS and AVEPAGES 17,214,702.90
12,279,511.35 12,279,511.35 12,279,511.35
1,144,868.97 1,144,868.97 1,144,868.97
13,424,380.32 13,424,380.32
13,424,380.32
5.538 5.462 5.538
5.538 5.462 5.538
5.462 5.538 1
FEDERAL AGENCY ISSUES - COUPON
00964 FEDERAL FAP. H GREDIT EAI{K 01/16/96
~9 FEDERAL FARM GREDIT BANK 03/05/96
00973 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 05/20/96
00922 FEDERAL HOME ~Ai{ BANK 12/19/94
130925 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 12/28/94
00939 FEDERAL ]{3I{E LOAN RANK 04/06/95
00940 FEDERAl, HO!{E LOAH ~ 04/06/95
00962 FEDERAL HOME LOAH BANK 12/18/95
00971 FEDERAl, HONE LOAN B~NK 03/19/96
00974 FEDERAL }NDNE LOAN ~ 05/21/96
00938
00957
00967
00968
00972
00921
00926
00947
00959
FEDERAL HONE LOAN MORTG. CO 04/06/95
FEDERAL HOME LOAN 8DRTG. CO 11/20/95
FEI)ERALHONE LOANMORTG. CO03/06/96
FEDERAL BONE LOAN 140RTG. CO 02/22/96
FEDEP. A/~ HOME LOAN FaORTG. CO 05/15/96
FEDERAl, NATL 14TG ASSN 12/21/94
FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 12/29/94
FEDERAL NATL 14TG ASSN 05/08/95
FEDERAL NATL WrG ASSN 11/29/95
1,O00,O(N).O0 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00
1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,037,810.00
1,{)65,134.38 1,090,0(0).00 1,093,749.60
965,156.25 1,000,000.00 981,560.00
942,968.75 1,0{)0,(3{){).00 976,250.00
4,000,000.00 4,000,000.00 4,000,000.00
995,312.50 1,000,000.00 995,312.50
1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00
1,0{)2,031.25 1,000,0(30.00 1,019,380.00
2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00
1,998,750.00 2,000,000.0{) 1,998,750.00
1,985,312.50 2,00{),00{).00 1,985,312.50
3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00
1,981,250.{)0 2,0(30,000.0{) 2,020,620.0{)
1,998,125.00 2,0{)0,000.00 2,145,312.50
1,500,000.00 1,500,00).00 1,539,375.00
4,000,O00.(M) 4,0(M),O00.O0 4,000,000.00
6.030 6.030 6.114 01/16/01 1,690
6.165 6.165 6.251 03/05/01 1,738
6.500 6.500 6.590 05/20/99 1,083
8.030 8.030 8.142 12/19/97 566
6.360 7.789 7.898 09/19/96 110
4.570 6.638 6.730 12/30/96 212
5.240 7.030 7.127 11/30/98 912
6.195 6.195 6.281 12/18/00 1,661
5.880 6.053 6.137 03/19/99 1,021
7.025 7.025 7.123 05/21/01 1,815
7.420 7.226 7.326 09/23/99 1,209
6.290 6.290 6.377 11/17/00 1,630
5.990 6.005 6.088 03/06/01 1,739
5.695 5.867 5.948 02/16/01 1,721
7.275 7.275 7.376 05/15/01 1,809
7.050 7.607 7.712 10/10/96 131
7.700 7.752 7.859 12/10/96 192
7.270 7.270 7.371 05/08/00 1,437
6.230 6.230 6.317 11/28/00 1,641
06/11/1996 CITY OF RANC~~GA PM - 3
INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO DETAILS - INVESTMENTS CITY
MAY 31, 1996 CASE
INVESTNDff AVERAGE PURCRASE STATED ---TIN--- MATURITY DAYS
IlllEER ISSUER BALAICE DATE BOON VALa FACE VALOE MARKET VALUE RATE 360 365 DATE TO MAT
FEDERAL AG!!CY ISSUES -
00960 FEDERAL NATL HTG ASSN 11/24/95
SUBTOTALS and AVERAGES 33,321,137.40
TREASORY SECURITIES - CCXlPON
00903 TREASURY NOTE
AVERAGES
o6/08/94
272,845.00
1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 5.970 5.970 6.053 11/25/98 907
35,934,040.63 36,293,432.10
36,090,000.00 6.648 6.740 1,309
272,845.00 277,000.00 275,786.74 6.141 6.569 6.660 08/31/97 456
14ONTGAGE RACKED SECURITIES
00071 FEDERAL BONE LOAN NORTG. 0002/23/87
00203 FEDERAL NATL WI~ ASS] 09/21/87
00002 GOVERNMENT NATIONAL NORTG I 07/01/87
00069 GOVERNENT RATIONAL MONTG I 07/01/87
SUBTOTALS and AVB~AGES 307,719.52
SMALL BUS. AI)H/MISCELLANEOUS AGENCY
00004 SHALL BUSINESS AIIMIN 07/25/86
AVERAGES 1,101,562.50
53,429.16 54,852.89 442,907.10
112,619.42 121,915.48 612,753.80
115,655.75 117,268.19 663,389.28
24,285.56 23,806.63 84,710.58
305,989.89 1,803,760.76
317,843.19
8.000 8.336 8.452 01/01/02 2,040
8.500 9.557 9.689 09/01/10 5,205
8.500 8.631 8.751 05/15/01 1,809
9,000 8.515 8.634 03/15/01 1,748
8.911 9.035 3,094
1,101,562.50 1,000,000.00 1,065,142.39 9.125 8.184 8.298 07/25/11 5,532
TOTAL INVESTMENTS and AVG.
$ 64,864,350.54 66,688,034.51
65,027,370.49 64,934,755.71 6.302% 6.389% 890
06/11/1996 CITY OF RAN(M]O CUCAMONGA P~ - 4
INVESTMENT PORT[OLIO DETAILS - CASH CITY
MAY 31, 1996 CASH
INVESTMENT AVERAGE P~I~C~]ASE STATED --- YTM --- MATURITY DAYS
NUMBER ISSUER BALANCE DATE BOOK VALUE FACE VALUE MARKET VALUE RATE 360 365 DATE TOMAT
aE(XING/SAVI]eGS ACCOUNTS
00180 BANK OF AMERICA
AVERAGES
666,363.39
948,615.00 2.000 1.973 2.000
Accrued Interest at Purchase
22,626.69
971,241.69
TOTAL CASH and INVESTMENTS $ 65,693,733.88 65,835,592.23
)7
06/11/1996
CITY OF RANGHO CUCAMONGA
PORTFOLIOHASTER INVESTHENTACTIVITY BY TYPE
HAY 1, 1996 - HAY 31, 1996
CITY
CASH
STATED TRANSACTION PURCHASES SALES/HATURITIES
TYPE INVESTENT I ISSUEN RATE DATE OR DEPOSITS ON WITEDRAWALS KalAMCE
CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT - BANK
00975 SAMWA
BEGINNING BALANCE: 12,325,532.20
6.000 05/22/1996 1,500,000.00 13,825,532.20
LOCAL AGENCY INVESTHENT FUNDS (Monthly Sumaary)
00005 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND 5.538
00804 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND 5.538
SUBTOTALS and ENDING BALANCE
4,500,000.00
BEGINNING BALANCE:
6,500,000.00
15,424,380.32
4,500,000.00 6,500,000.00 13,424,380.32
CHECKING/SAVINGS ACCOUNTS (Monthly Summary)
00180 BANK OF AMERICA
BEGINNING BAUd{CE:
1,642,200.00 1,843,000.00
1,149,415.00
948,615.00
FEDERAL AGENCY ISSUES - CO{3PON
00973 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 6.500
04)974 FEDERAL HONE LOAM BANK 7.025
00972 FEDEPu~L HOME LOAM MORTG. CORP. 7.275
SUBTOTALS and EI~)ING BALANCE
05/20/1996 1,000,000.00
05/21/1996 1,000,000.00
05/15/1996 3,000,000.00
BEGINNING BALANCE:
5,000,000.00 0.00
30,934,040.63
35,934,040.63
TRBASURY SECURITIES - CO(]PON
BEGINNING BAI~JiCE:
272,845.00
272,845.00
MOlarGAGE BACKED SECURITIES
00071 FEDERAL HONE LOAM MORTG. CORP. 8.000
00203 FEDERAL NATL NTG ASSN 8.500
00002 GOVERNMENT NATIONAL MORTG ASSN 8.500
(N)069 GOVEPJ(MENT NATIONAL NORTG ASSN 9.000
SUBTOTALS and ENDING BJ~LANCE
BEGINNING BALANCE:
05/15/96 1,439.98
05/28/96 598.25
05/13/96 1,418.75
05/07/96 46.82
309,493.69
0.00 3,503.80 305,989.89
SMALL BUS. ADM/MISCELLANEO US AGENCY
TOTALS BEGINNING BALANCE: $
BEGINNING BALANCE: 1,101,562.50
1,101,562.50
61,517,269.34 12,642,200.00 8,346,503.80 65,812,965.54
RPPLICRTION
TO:
Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control
3737 Main St., Suite 900
Riverside, CA 9250 I
(909) 782-4400
~~ DROPPING
FOR ALCOHOL BEVERAGE LICENSE(S)
File Number .............. 320532
Receipt Number ......... 1090290
Geographical Code ........ 3615
Copies Mailed Date 6-3-96
Issued Date Iss
DISTRICT SERVING LOCATION:
Name of Business:
Location of Business:
Number and Street
City, State Zip Code
County
Is premise inside city limits?
If premise licensed:
Type of license
Transferor's names/license:
RIVERSIDE
GRAZIANOS PIZZA
9255 BASELINE RD L
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
SAN BERNARDINO
YES
CA 91730
PARTNER
NO
RECEIVED
JUN - 4 1996
Girt OF RANCHO CUCAML)i,ILiA
CITY CLERK
License TVDe Transaction TVD~ Fee T/De Master DUD Date
1.41 ON-SALE BEER AND W ORIGINAL NA YES 0 JUN 03,1996
2.41 ON-SALE BEER AND W AN~NUAL FEE NA YES 0 JUN 03,1995
Fee
$300.00 :
S205.00 :
8505.00
NO
· TOTAL "
Have you ever been Have you ever violated any provisions of the Alcoholic-Beverage Control
convicted of a felony? NO Control Act. or regulations of' the department pertaining to the Act?
Explain any "Yes" answer to the above questions on an attachment which shall be deemed i~a,'1 of this application.
Applicant agrees (a) that any manager employed in on-sale licensed premise will have all the: qualifications of a licensee. and (b) that
he will not violate or cause or permit to be violated any of' the provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of SAN BERNARDINO Date JUN 03,1996
Under penalty of perjury each person whose signature appears below. cerd~es and says: (I) He is an applicant. or one of the applicants. or an executive officer of the
applicant corporation. named in the foregoing application. duly authorized to make this application on its behalf; (2) that he has read the foregoing and knows the
contents thereof and that each of the above statements therein made are ume; (3) that no person other than the applicant or applicants has any direct or indirect interest in
the applicanl or applicam's business to he conducted under the license(s) for which this application is made; (4) thai the transfer application or proposed transfer is not
made to sansfy the paymen of a loan or :o fulfill an agreement entered into more than ninety (90) days preceding the day on which the transfer application is filled with
the Department or to gain or e~tabli~h a preference to or for any creditor or transferor or to defraud or injure any creditor of transferor; (5) that the transfer application may
be withdrawn by eelher the apphcant or the hcensee tth ~o r laabfiny to the Department.
Applicant Name(s) c"" //, _ Applicant Signature(s)
ANCONA SALVATORE .... ~ /"
ANCONA VINCENT
,~ ·
ABC 211 (5/96)
RECEIVED
JUN · 1995
City ot ~ancbo Cucam°nga
pianning Division
Iq
CAtltOINIA
APPL I CATi ON FOR ALCOHOL BEVERAGE
TO:
Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control
4505 Allstate Drive, Suite 102
Riverside, CA 92501
(909) 782-4400
DISTRICT SERVING LOCATION:
Name of Business:
Location of Business:
Number and Street
City, State Zip Code
County
Is premise inside city limits?
If p~mis~ licens~l:
Type of license
RECEIVED
i AY 3 !. 936
L I C E ~ancho Cucam0nga
File Number . 2~l~ing Division
Receipt Number ......... 10r/614
Geographical Code ........ 3615
Copies Mailed Date 5-1~
Issued Date ~em
RIVERSIDR
NEW KISHI RESTAURANT
8760 BASELINE RD
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
SAN BERNARDINO
'YES
CA 91701
Transferor'snamedlicense: TSUKUMI INC 195853
Licen-~e TYPe TraDnaction TYPe Fee TVDe Master DUD Date Fee
1.41 ON-SALE BEER AND W PERSON TO PERSON TRANS NA YES 0 FAY 15,1996 $150.00:
2.41 ON-SALE BEER AND W ANNUAL FEE NA YES 0 MAY 15,1996 $205.00:
3. NA NO LICENSE TYPE STATE FINGERPRINTS NA YES 0 MAY 15,1996 $78.00:
TOTAL $433.00
Have you ever been Have you ever violated any provisions of the Alcoholic Beverag~ Control
convicted of a felony? NO Control Act, or regulations of the department pertaining to the Act? NO
Explain any "Yes" answer m the above questions on an _~hmcnt which shall be deemed poxt of this application.
Applicant agrees (a) that any manager employed in on-sale licensed premise will have all the qualifications of a licensee. and (b) that
he v~ill not violate or cause or permit to be violated any of the provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act.
STATE OF CALIF6RNIA County of SAN BERNARDINO Date MAY lS,1996
Under penalty Of IM='juP/. each peTlOll whose siJnllule I1~ below. ccffifiel and lays: (1) He iS In II~IiClSI, ~ oil of ee I!~iel~ll. or i~ execulive office' of
mppucant corporation. named in ~e fos~going sppUce~on. duly mathorized so m~ke thin application oa ats bdudf; (2) / be bu re~d the foregolaa ~md knows the
cohen ~ereof ud that each of Ihe above e,m~qt~ lettin made are uue; 0) dmt no penon oekr clma Ic licaat or appiicama him eay direct or indirect ial~ut in
· e 81~lic~tt o~ N~llcBnt's business to be conducl~d under ~be ticant(0 for which this q~ltcadon is m~de; (4~d,u Ck Utmtr k~Zio~ or Utasfer is
be wid~lrawn by eimet me applicam or the lioemee wilh tm muffins lialgIRy to th~ Depamnent.
A%~oh= ~ & 231
1205 E. C~ Ave,
~e, ~. 92~
ABC 211 (9~)3)
LICENSE ACTION REQUEST
1. NAME
Tsukuad Inc.
3. DBA
Tsukusi RestaUrant
r~ PREMISE8 ADORE~ CrrY ANO 23P
8760 Baseline Rd. ~,nr'ho Catcillone~
A. APPLICATION TO TRANSFER LICENSE
7. Treele ~: ITSHI, Raymond & Yoshiko
91701
m'A'~ (N~ ~
~1-195853
Name(s) of Lkemsee(s) SiSmature(s) of Ucemee(s) Name(s) et Licmsee(s)
k : Nary Hori/Sec a
c.
SiNustun(s) d LiceMs)
B. CANCELLATION [] Immediately [] Upon Issuance [] Other:
I voluntar~y cancel my !iceme because [ am no !on2er in business. I understand my license cannot be reactivated
or reinstated,
· Important Notice to License
AH Hccnsus sun~ndefcd will be lutomatictlly revokcd if le m~,wd ~ ee NX paid. An clmnle of meHix~ eddz~ sixall be to be Dis~-t Office. The
(a) if the u'ansferor intend~ to tmumc opezalion oft~n~cemed business be must request the return of the suffendeffed license and establish that there has been no change
in ~ ownershi or the qualifications of the licensed premises. m of the
(b) If the innsrear cloe~ not intend to resume openlion of the licensed bosineas and does not request mm sS license meat the Deparmtent will proceed
to hold the license under the provisions of Rule 65. 'llse effective date of Rule 65 surrender will be the date of application, denial, or withdrawal,
C. SURRENDER - Rule 65 O Immediately [] Upon Issuance [] Other:
I voluntarily surrender my license for a period of not more than one year. I intcnd to [] Transfer [] Reactivate the license.
I understand that the license must be renewed at the time renewal fees are duc or the license will be autonmica!ly revoked. l ~ undcntand
that the Department will proceed to automatically cancel my license at the expiration of the one-year period if not transferred or reactivated.
12, DATE OLDSEt} ] 13, S~GNATURE ~ 14. DATE [ 15, HOME TELEPHONE NUMBER
x ( )
16. MAIUNI ADDRESS
FOSDEPAfflldENTUSECM4LY DPr~mis~sAbanda~t DL~t~-A~!ch~dl~qul~in~ ClOth~.
Sunmader or Cancellation
D. REQUEST FOR SURRENDER OF RETAIL LICENSE FOR TEMPORARY PERMIT
UNDER SECTION 24045.5(I}) OF THE ALCOHOLIC BL:rVERAOE CONTROL ACT
17. ~REE ] 16. SURRENOER DATE I 19. EFFECTIVE DATE 2{}. ~XPIP4kl~ON DAT~
[TSH~, Raymond & Yeshike
F~ ~T FOR SURRENDER OF PRIVILEGES ON A PORTION OF THE PREMISES
23.1/Webevereedlefere2dqemlkewlecemtemtsleeeeL
SGN~TUnE X
UNDER RULE 53.
I/we hereby surrender b'm privileges or my/our alcotmfic beverage ricerme in my/our
between the hours of and
date
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA '
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
June 19, 1996
Mayor and Members of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
Deborah Kaye Clark, Library Manager
APPROVAL TO APPROPRIATE $9,240 AWARDED BY THE
CALIFORNIA STATE LIBRARY INTO LIBRARY ACCOUNTS
RECOMMENDATION
Approve acceptance of a grant award of $9,240 and appropriate into Library Revenue Account
02-3901-1510 and Expenditure Account 113-4532-3900.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The California State Library is responsible for distributing Library Services and Construction
Act funds (LSCA) to local library jurisdictions. MURLS funding, (Major Urban Resource
Libraries) is eligible on application by any library jurisdiction with a population in excess of
100,000. The funds must be used for business reference resources.
Rancho Cucamonga Public Library applied for $9,240 and was awarded that amount on March
15, 1996. Of that amount, $9,040 is to be spent on library materials and $200 on related
operational expenses.
Fiscal Impact:
None. The check has been received from the State Library and the funds already placed in the
appropriate revenue account to cover this appropriation. Invoices must be dated based on
~Fe,~eral fiscal year, October 1, 1995 through September 30, 1996.
Res~pectfully submitted,
ye k ~" ~
Library ~~
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 19, 1996
TO:
Mayor and Members of the City Council
City Manager, Jack Lam, AICP
FROM:
Linda D. Daniels, Acting Administrative Services Director
BY:
Joan Kruse, Purchasing Agent
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL TO DECLARE SURPLUS MISCELLANEOUS CITY-
OWNED EQUIPMENT
RECOMMENDATION
That City Council approval be given to surplus the following listed City-owned equipment which
is either no longer needed, obsolete or unusable.
BACKGROUND
The City' s purchasing manual identifies two major categories of surplus property; materials and
supplies, and capital equipment. It has been the policy of the City to request that the City
Council provide authorization to the Purchasing Agent to dispose of City property by declaring
such items surplus. Methods of disposition can be transfer to another department, trade-in, sale
by bid or auction, sale as scrap, donation, or simply trashing.
The following items are to be surplused:
Xerox 630 Memorywriter typewriter, Asset Tag No. 00396
Xerox 4045, S/N V31-415614, Asset Tag No. 00160
Xerox Telecopier 7020, S/N 98G-027193
FMC Street Sweeper Parts from Sweepers No. 566, 565,822 and 1018, Unit Nos. 642,
643,644 and 648 (per attached listing)
The Memorywriter typewriter is beyond repair and will be disposed of; the Xerox 4045 printer
and 7020 telecopier will be used as trade-ins; street sweeper parts will be advertised for bid and
the City will accept the best offer.
Respectfully submitted, . .~
Linda D. Daniels
Acting Administrative Services Director
Attach.
FMC SURPLUS SWEEPER PARTS
Paff #
303337
301247
303067
300285
308292
308206
32036
308292
305544
208263
350796
305092
304887
305381
300435
306222
309371
309371
302382
308794
47499
302382
302819
305352
????
306000
303463
305732
300769
651407
303167
305482
302836
302837
????
300993
305627
305327
302967
305046
303759
302479
302862
309645
05/21/96
Description
Arm, Dmg Shoe
Arm Drag Shoe
Beanng
Bearings
Beanngs, Elevator
Beanng, Axle
Bearing,
Bearing,
Bracket
Bracket
Bracket,
Bracket,
Bracket,
Bracket,
Bracket.
Bracket
Bracket
Bracket
Bracket
Bracket
Bracket
Bracket
P.U.B.
Timkin
Alternator
Center Deflector
Center Deflector
Center Deflector
Compressor
Deflector
Elevator
Elevator (used)
G.B.
G.B.
G.B.
G.B.
Brake Relay
Brake, Parking, Actuator
Brake, Shoes, Rear, Set
Breaker, 20 amp.
Bushing
Bushing
Bushing, Cab Mount
Bushing, Nylon
Buzzer, Warning
Cable Accellerator Pedal
Cable Battery, Black
Cable Battery, Red
Cable Emergency, 3000
Cable G.B.
Cable Park Brake
Cable Suction Hood
Cable Throttle
Clevis, P.U.B.
Clutch, Blower
Coil
Coil
Collar, Locking
Quantity
4
2
1
6
5
2
2
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
29
12
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
2
4
6
4
5
1
10
7
5
1
4
2
3
1
1
2
6
6
1
Part Description Order
PARTSSRP.WK4
FMC SURPLUS SWEEPER PARTS
Pa~ #
302713
307057
304267
300517
302860
309169
306682
305306
305025
302591
302592
300516
101842
????
Pl19778
300115
309093
Wix 46696
395134
306670
29501131
204272
300225
300319
300383
307119
304852
304611
304852
305250
????
306210
????
304548
305797
308522
308527
306331
304549
305838
305837
305838
305837
304449
05/21/96
Description
Cooler, Hydraulic (m-built)
Cylinder, Hopper
Cylinder, Hydraulic
Cylinder, Hydraulic Steering
Cylinder, Master w/Booster
Cylinder, Slave, Go-pedal
Cylinder, Wheel
Door, Hopper Access
Drag Shoe
Drag Shoe, L.H.
Drag Shoe, R.H.
End, Tie Rod
End, Tie Rod
Filler Strainer
Filter, Air, Inner
Filter, Element, Hydraulic
Filter, Engine Breather
Filter, Fresh Air
Filter, Hydraulic
Fitting, NC
Fitting, Hydraulic
Fitting, Hydraulic
Flange
Flange Assembly
Flange, Water Tank
Flap
Flap
Flap, Hopper
Flap, Outlet
Flex Plate
Frequency Converter, Argo
Gear, Output- Center
Hose
Hose
Hose
Hose.
Hose.
Hose.
Hose
Hose
Hose
Hose
Hose
Hose
Filler
Hydraulic
Hydraulic
Hydraulic
Hydraulic
Hydraulic
Hydraulic
Lower Radiator
Radiator
Radiator
Upper Radiator
Wandering
Quantity
1
1
1
1
1
2
4
2
2
1
1
2
1
6
3
5
4
4
1
1
1
8
2
14
4
4
2
2
1
2
1
1
2
1
3
1
2
3
4
2
2
2
1
1
Part Description Order
PARTSSRP.WK4
FMC SURPLUS SWEEPER PARTS
Part # Description
308561 Hub Power Steering
304808 Hub, Drive
308593 Hydraulic Cylinder, P.U.B.
308612 Hydraulic Motor/Elevator
304994 Latch
307006 Latch, Window
303161 Lift, P.U.B.
305060 Liner, Blower
305061 Liner, Blower
305062 Liner, Blower
305086 Link, Lift
305046 Link, Lift
303882 Link, Lift P.U.B.
305086 Link, Lift, P.U.B.
305644 Lug, Stud
305810 Motor Assembly, L.H.
305992 Motor, Wiper
306100 Nozzle, Spray
30847 Nozzle, Spray
304788 Pad, Hopper
305730 Pin
303504 Plate, End, P.U.B.
208260 Pulley, Alternator
308793 Pulley, G.B.
208495 Pulley, Harmonic Balancer
21551703 Pulley, Power Steering
306299 Pump, Main (Used)
390226 Pump, Main, Gasket
306734 Pump, Main, Gasket
304520 Pump, Main, Gasket
306726 Pump, Main, Top Cover
13373 Pump, Power Steering
???? Pump, Water 8.2 Liter
???? Pump, Water, Pulley Driven
364708 P.U.B. Arm
303464 P.U.B. Pivot Arm
202577 Retainer, Mud Flap
21002 Ring, Locking
307017 Seal
300234 Seal
307016 Seal
306351 Seal, Axle
896590-91 Seal, Hopper
871091 Seal, Hopper
05/21/96
Quantity
1
1
2
1
1
4
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
10
1
1
8
12
2
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
4
13
6
3
1
5
6
Part Description Order
PARTSSRP.WK4
FMC SURPLUS SWEEPER PARTS
Paff #
308810
309283
302476
300543
306223
308571
2484
3028484
891091-234
891091-84
306978
744741
59861
58605
59401
206230
558701
308829
308352
306212
????
????
380052
304386
303763
308746
306730
306199
305054
305579
304776
82966
304324
57793
306108
350139
306667
305605
305561
350475
268790
304854
????
208133
05/21/96
Description
Seal Kit
Seal Kit
Seal Kit
Seal. Kit
Seal Kit,
Seal Kit,
Seal Kit,
Seal Kit, Steering Valve
Seal Rubber Hopper
Seal Rubber Hopper
Seal Side Elevator
Seal Window
Sender, Hydraulic Low
Sender, Oil Pressure
Sensor, Tach.
Sensor, Temperature
Shaft, Drive Assembly
Shaft, Elevator
Shaft, Gear Box
Shaft, Gear Box
Shaft, G.B.
Shaft, G.B. Motor
Shaft, Main, Pump
Shaft, Stainless G.B.
Shield
Shifter, Two Speed
Shim
Shim, Kit, Gear Box
Shock, G.B.
Shock, G.B.
Spacer
Spacer
Spacer, Fan
Spacer, Squeegee
Spray Bar
Spring, Brake
Spring, Brake, Front
Spring, Leaf
Spring, Suction Hood
Sprocket, Elevator
Sprocket, Elevator
Squeegee
Stack Valve, Used
Starter
Eaton Main Pump
Power Steering
Steering
Quantity
4
3
4
1
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
7
4
4
1
48
3
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
4
2
Part Description Order
PARTSSRP.WK4
FMC SURPLUS SWEEPER PARTS
Part # Description
300118 Strainer, Hydraulic
55128 Switch
309274 Switch
308221 Switch, Pressure
304436 Switch, Turn Signal
305513 Switch, Variable
306050 Switch, Wiper
300667 Tee, 1" Hydraulic
300609 Tee, Exhaust
306943 Thermostat
305340 Torque, Hub, R.H. (used)
305837 Tube
245023 Tube
215649 U-Joint
304411 Universal Joint Kit
55806 Valve, Control
306946 Valve, Expansion
306605 Valve, Relief
306606 Valve, Relief
300774 Valve, Steering
38601 Visor
999999 ????
304614 ????
Quantity
3
1
1
2
2
1
1
3
4
2
1
2
5
3
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
3
05/21/96
Part Description Order
PARTSSRP.WK4
FMC SURPLUS SWEEPER PARTS
Pa~ #
891091-234
891091-84
896590-91
Pl19778
Wix 46696
????
????
????
????
????
????
????
????
????
????
2484
13373
21002
30847
32036
38601
47499
55128
55806
57793
58605
59401
59861
82966
101842
202577
204272
206230
208133
208260
208263
208495
215649
245023
268790
300115
300118
300225
300234
05/21/96
Description
Seal, Rubber Hopper
Seal, Rubber Hopper
Seal, Hopper
Filter, Air, Inner
Filter, Fresh Air
Frequency Converter, Argo
Cable, Emergency, 3000
Pump, Water, Pulley Driven
Shaft, G.B. Motor
Shaft, G.B.
Pump, Water 8.2 Liter
Stack Valve, Used
Hose, Filler
Brake, Shoes, Rear, Set
Filler Strainer
Seal, Kit, Steering
Pump, Power Steering
Ring, Locking
Nozzle, Spray
Bearing, P.U.B.
Visor
Bracket, G.B.
Switch
Valve, Control
Spacer, Squeegee
Sender, Oil Pressure
Sensor, Tach.
Sender, Hydraulic Low
Spacer
End, Tie Rod
Retainer, Mud Flap
Fitting, Hydraulic
Sensor, Temperature
Starter
Pulley, Alternator
Bracket
Pulley, Harmonic Balancer
U-Joint
Tube
Sprocket, Elevator
Filter, Element, Hydraulic
Strainer, Hydraulic
Flange
Seal
Quantity
1
2
5
3
4
1
1
1
1
3
1
4
2
1
6
1
1
4
12
2
1
2
1
1
48
2
2
2
4
1
2
8
1
2
1
1
1
3
5
1
5
3
2
6
Part Number Order
PARTSSRP.WK4
FMC SURPLUS SWEEPER PARTS
Pa~ #
300285
300319
300383
300435
300516
300517
300543
300609
300667
300769
300774
300993
301247
302382
302382
302476
302479
302591
302592
302713
302819
302836
302837
302860
302862
302967
303067
303161
303167
303337
303463
303464
303504
303759
303763
303882
304267
304324
304386
304411
304436
304449
304520
304548
Description
Bearings
Flange Assembly
Flange, Water Tank
Bracket, Compressor
End, Tie Rod
Cylinder, Hydraulic Steering
Seal, Kit
Tee, Exhaust
Tee, 1" Hydraulic
Bushing, Cab Mount
Valve, Steering
Cable, G.B.
Arm, Drag Shoe
B racket, G.B.
Bracket, G.B.
Seal, Kit
Coil
Drag Shoe, L.H.
Drag Shoe, R.H.
Cooler, Hydraulic (re-built)
Brake Relay
Cable, Battery, Black
Cable, Battery, Red
Cylinder, Master w/Booster
Coil
Cable, Throttle
Bearing
Lift, P.U.B.
Buzzer, Warning
Arm, Drag Shoe
Bushing
P.U.B. Pivot Arm
Plate, End, P.U.B.
Clutch, Blower
Shield
Link, Lift P.U.B.
Cylinder, Hydraulic
Spacer, Fan
Shaft, Stainless G.B.
Universal Joint Kit
Switch, Turn Signal
Hose, Wandering
Pump, Main, Gasket
Hose, Hydraulic
Quantity
6
14
4
1
2
1
1
4
3
4
2
4
2
1
1
4
6
1
1
1
1
7
5
1
6
1
1
1
1
4
4
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
05/21/96 Part Number Order PARTSSRP .WK4
FMC SURPLUS SWEEPER PARTS
PaN#
304549
304611
304614
304776
304788
304808
304852
304852
304854
304887
304994
305025
305046
305046
305054
305060
305061
305062
305086
305086
305092
305250
305306
305327
305340
305352
305381
305482
305513
305544
305561
305579
305605
305627
305644
305730
305732
305797
305810
305837
305837
305837
305838
305838
Description
Hose, Hydraulic
Flap, Hopper
????
Spacer
Pad, Hopper
Hub, Drive
Flap, Outlet
Flap
Squeegee
Bracket, Center Deflector
Latch
Drag Shoe
Link, Lift
Clevis, P.U.B.
Shock, G.B.
Liner, Blower
Liner, Blower
Liner, Blower
Link, Lift
Link, Lift, P.U.B.
Bracket, Center Deflector
Flex Plate
Door, Hopper Access
Cable, Suction Hood
Torque, Hub, R.H. (used)
Brake, Parking, Actuator
Bracket, Center Deflector
Cable, Accellerator Pedal
Switch, Variable
Bracket
Spring, Suction Hood
Shock, G.B.
Spring, Leaf
Cable, Park Brake
Lug, Stud
Pin
Bushing
Hose, Hydraulic
Motor Assembly, L.H.
Hose, Upper Radiator
Hose, Radiator
Tube
Hose, Lower Radiator
Hose, Radiator
Quantity
4
2
3
4
2
1
1
2
2
1
1
2
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
3
1
1
1
10
1
1
1
7
2
2
10
2
6
3
1
1
2
2
2
2
05/21/96 Part N umber Order PARTSSRP.WK4
FMC SURPLUS SWEEPER PARTS
Paff #
305992
306000
306050
306100
306108
306199
306210
306212
306222
306223
306299
306331
306351
306605
306606
306667
306670
306682
306726
306730
306734
306943
306946
306978
307006
307016
307017
307057
307119
308206
308221
308292
308292
308352
308522
308527
308561
308571
308593
308612
308746
308793
308794
308810
05/21/96
Description
Motor, Wiper
Breaker, 20 amp.
Switch, Wiper
Nozzle, Spray
Spray Bar
Shim, Kit, Gear Box
Gear, Output- Center
Shaft, Gear Box
Bracket, Deflector
Seal, Kit, Eaton Main Pump
Pump, Main (Used)
Hose, Hydraulic
Seal, Axle
Valve, Relief
Valve, Relief
Spring, Brake, Front
Fitting, NC
Cylinder, Wheel
Pump, Main, Top Cover
Shim
Pump, Main, Gasket
Thermostat
Valve, Expansion
Seal, Side Elevator
Latch, Window
Seal
Seal
Cylinder, Hopper
Flap
Bearing, Axle
Switch, Pressure
Bearings, Elevator
Bearing, Timkin
Shaft, Gear Box
Hose, Hydraulic
Hose, Hydraulic
Hub Power Steering
Seal, Kit, Power Steering
Hydraulic Cylinder, P.U.B.
Hydraulic Motor/Elevator
Shifter, Two Speed
Pulley, G.B.
Bracket, G.B.
Seal, Kit
Quantity
1
2
1
8
3
1
1
1
2
2
1
3
1
2
1
2
1
4
1
2
1
2
1
2
4
3
13
1
4
2
2
5
3
1
1
2
1
2
2
1
1
2
2
4
Part Number Order
PARTSSRP.WK4
FMC SURPLUS SVVEEPER PARTS
Pa~ #
308829
309093
309169
309274
309283
309371
309371
309645
350139
350475
350796
364708
380052
390226
395134
558701
651407
744741
871091
999999
3028484
21551703
29501131
Description
Shaft, Elevator
Filter, Engine Breather
Cylinder, Slave, Go-pedal
Switch
Seal, Kit
Bracket, Elevator
Bracket, Elevator (used)
Collar, Locking
Spring, Brake
Sprocket, Elevator
Bracket, Alternator
P.U.B. Arm
Shaft, Main, Pump
Pump, Main, Gasket
Filter, Hydraulic
Shaft, Drive Assembly
Bushing, Nylon
Seal, Window
Seal, Hopper
????
Seal, Kit, Steering Valve
Pulley, Power Steering
Fitting, Hydraulic
Quantity
1
4
2
1
3
29
12
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
5
1
6
1
1
1
1
05/21/96 Part N umber Order PARTSSRP .WK4
DATE:
TO:.
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
June 19, 1996
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Chairman and Members of the Redevelopment Agency
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Manager
Olen Jones, Senior Redevelopment Analyst
APPROVAL OF ANNUAL LOAN TRANSACTION
BETWEEN
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the repayment and re-borrowing of the
annual loan between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho
Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency.
BACKGROUND: In order to receive tax increment revenue, the principal
source of redevelopment funding, a Redevelopment Agency must demonstrate
existing deb~ which will be repaid by the tax increment received.
ANALYSIS: Each year, the Agency and City approve the annual loan
transaction at about the time the budget is approved.
During Fiscal Year 1995/96, the Redevelopment Agency is able to pay to the City
approximately $5,223,403 towards the principal and interest on the City/Agency
loan. At the present time, it is necessary for City to authorize the Agency to re-
borrow the amount of $4,523,403.
Respectfully submitted,
Linda D. Daniels
Redevelopment Manager
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
June 19, 1996
Mayor and Members of the City Council,
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
Linda D. Daniels, Acting Administrative Services Director
APPROVAL OF SALARY AND BENEFITS RESOLUTION FOR FISCAL
YEAR 1996-1997 AND RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 95-113
(95-96 FY SALARY AND BENEFITS)
RECOMMENDATION
The City Council adopt the attached Resolution which will enact the terms of the Memorandum of
Understanding approved by the City Council on June 5, 1996. In addition, the Council rescind
Resolution 95-113 which related to the prior fiscal year salary and benefit terms.
BACKGROUND
During the past two months, staff has met collectively with the City' s three bargaining groups. Staff
has successfully concluded a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with each group and these
have been approved by the City Council at the June 5, 1996 meeting.
The attached Salary and Benefit Resolution is the mechanism for implementing the approved
MOU's with the City's three bargaining groups. The cost for enactment of the MOU's can be
contained within the proposed 1996-1997 Fiscal Year Budget and represents a 2.5% cost of living
adjustment. The attached Salary and Benefit Resolution will become effective on July 1, 1996.
Respectfully submitted,
Acting Administrative Services Director
LDD:pm
Attachment
RESOLUTION NO. 96-096
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RESCINDING
RESOLUTION NO. 95-113 AND IMPLEMENTING SALARY AND
BENEFITS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1996-97
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has determined that it
is necessary for the efficient operation and management of the City that policies be established
prescribing salary ranges, benefits, and holidays and other policies for employees of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga recognizes that it
competes in a marketplace to obtain qualified personnel to perform and provide municipal services, and
that compensation and conditions of employment must be sufficiently attractive to recruit and retain
qualified employees,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, California, as follows:
SECTION 1: Salary Ranges
ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO PAY RANGES
(Monthly Amounts)
Control
Minimum Point Maximum
Class Title Step Amount Step Amount Step Amount
Account Clerk I
Account Clerk II
Account Technician
Accountant#
Accounting Manager*
Accts Payable Supervisor#
Admin Secretary ~
Admin Services Director+
Animal Control Officer I
Animal Control Officer II
Assistant Building Official*
Assistant City Manager+
Assistant Deputy City Clerk
Assistant Engineer~
324 1,743 364 2,128 374 2,237
344 1,926 384 2,351 394 2,472
379 2,294 419 2,800 429 2,943
418 2,786 458 3,401 468 3,575
492 4,030 532 4,919 542 5,171
409 2,664 449 3,252 459 3,418
383 2,340 423 2,856 433 3,002
564 5,771 604 7,046 634 8,184
346 1,945 386 2,375 396 2,497
366 2,150 406 2,524 416 2,758
519 4,611 559 5,629 569 5,916
608 7,188 648 8,776 678 10,188
330 1,796 370 2,193 380 2,305
454 3,334 494 4,070 504 4,278
Resolution No. 96-096
Page 2
Class Title
Assistant Landscape Designer~
Assistant Park Planner#
Assistant Planner~
Assistant RDA Analyst#
Assistant to the City Manager*
Associate Enginee~
Associate Park Planne~
Associate Planne~
Benefits Technician
Building Inspection Superviso~ 2
Building Inspector2
Building Official+
Business License Clerk
Business License Superviso~
Business License Technician
Buye~
Cashier/Account Clerk
City Engineer+
City Manager
City Planner+
Code Enforcement Officer2
Code Enforcement Supervisor~ 2
Code Enforcement Technician
Community Development Director+
Community Services Director
Community Services Manager+
Community Services Officer
Community Services Technician
Computer Operator
Counter Plans Examiner#
Crime Analyst#
Custodian2
Data Base Management Analyst#
Data Processing Manager*
Deputy City Clerk~
Deputy City Engineer*
Deputy City Manager+
Deputy City Planner*
Disaster Preparedness Manager*
Disaster Preparedness Specialist
Electrical Specialist#2
Engineering Aide
Engineering Technician
Equipment Operator2
Minimum
Step Amount
409 2,664
431 2,973
442 3,140
421 2,828
507 4,343
484 3,872
451 3,284
461 3,452
358 2,065
463 3,487
423 2,856
549 5,355
347 1,955
412 2,704
377 2,271
409 2,664
324 1,743
569 5,916
561 5,685
407 2,637
437 3,063
367 2,160
599 5,629
535 4,994
554 5,490
385 2,363
393 2,459
376 2,260
453 3,317
432 2,988
353 2,015
478 3,758
507 4,343
391 2,435
539 5,094
555 5,517
531 4,895
492 4,030
402 2,572
443 3156
394 2,472
414 2,731
381 2,317
Control
Point
Step Amount
449 3,252
471 3,629
482 3,834
461 3,452
547 5,302
524 4,727
491 4,010
501 4,215
398 2,522
503 4,257
463 3,487
589 6,537
387 2,387
452 3,301
417 2,772
449 3,252
364 2,128
609 7,224
675 10,036
601 6,941
447 3,220
477 3,739
407 2,637
639 8,391
575 6,096
594 6,702
425 2,885
433 3,002
416 2,758
493 4,050
472 3,647
393 2,459
518 4,588
547 5,302
431 2,973
579 6,219
595 6,736
571 5,976
532 4.919
442 3,140
483 3,853
434 3,017
454 3,334
421 2,828
Maximum
Step Amount
459 3,418
481 3,815
492 4,030
471 3,629
557 5,573
534 4,969
501 4,215
511 4,430
408 2,650
513 4,475
473 3,665
619 7,594
397 2,509
462 3,470
427 2,914
459 3,418
374 2,237
639 8,391
631 8,063
457 3,384
487 3,930
417 2,772
669 9,740
605 7,081
624 7,786
435 3,033
443 3,156
426 2,899
503 4,257
482 3,834
403 2,585
528 4,822
557 5,573
441 3,125
589 6,537
625 7,825
581 6,281
542 5,171
452 3,301
493 4,050
444 3,172
464 3,505
431 2,973
Class Title
Executive Assistant*
Facilities Supervisor~
Finance Officer+
Fleet Maintenance Superintendent
GIS Superviso~
GIS Technician
Information Systems Specialist
Integrated Waste Coordinator*
Inventory Specialist Equip./1Mat2
Junior Engineer
Junior Engineering Aide
Landscape Designe~
Lead Maintenance Worker2
Lead Mechanic2
Librarian I#
Librarian II#
Library Assistant I#
Library Assistant II#
Library Clerk
Library Manager+
Library Technician
Maintenance Superviso~2
Maintenance Mechanic2
Maintenance WorkerTM
Management Aide
Management Analyst I#
Management Analyst II#
Mechanic2
Mechanic's Assistant2
Microcomputer Specialist
Office Services Clerk
Office Specialist I
Office Specialist II1
Park Construction/Acquist Supv#
Park Planning/Dev Supt*
Park/Landscape Maint Supt.2
Personnel Analyst I#
Personnel Analyst II#
Personnel Clerk
Personnel/Risk Manager*
Plan Check Coordinator*
Planning Commission Secretary#
Planning Technician
Plans Examiner#
Plans Examiner-Grading#2
Minimum
Step Amount
Control
Point
Step
422 2,842 462
447 3,220 487
534 4,969 574
487 3,930 527
461 3,452 501
406 2,624 446
401 2,560 441
509 4,386 549
357 2,055 397
424 2,871 464
374 2,237 414
439 3,094 479
391 2,435 431
415 2,745 455
409 2664 449
431 2,973 471
327 1,770 367
363 2,118 403
322 1,726 362
533 4,944 573
403 2,585 443
447 3,220 487
400 2,547 440
353 2,015 393
402 2,572 442
432 2,988 472
461 3,452 501
400 2,547 440
353 2,015 393
406 2,624 446
320 1,709 360
300 1,547 340
320 1,709 360
477 3,739 517
494 4,070 534
487 3,930 527
406 2,624 446
461 3,452 501
348 1,965 388
507 4,343 547
489 3,970 529
391 2,435 431
382 2,328 422
443 3,156 483
443 3,156 483
ResolutionNo. 96-096
Page 3
Amount
Maximum
Step Amount
3,470 472 3,647
3,930 497 4,131
6,066 604 7,046
4,798 537 5,044
4,215 511 4,430
3,204 456 3,367
3,125 451 3,284
5,355 559 5,629
2,509 407 2,637
3,505 474 3,684
2,731 424 2,871
3,777 489 3,970
2,973 441 3,125
3,351 465 3,522
3,252 459 3,418
3,629 481 3,815
2,160 377 2,271
2,585 413 2,717
2,107 372 2,215
6,036 603 7,011
3,156 453 3,317
3,930 497 4,131
3,109 450 3,268
2,459 403 2,585
3,140 452 3,301
3647 482 3,834
4,215 511 4,430
3,109 450 3,268
2,459 403 2,585
3,204 456 3,367
2,086 370 2,193
1,888 350 1,985
2,086 370 2,193
4,565 527 4,798
4,969 544 5,223
4,798 537 5,044
3,204 456 3,367
4,215 511 4,430
2,399 398 2,522
5,302 557 5,573
4,846 539 5,094
2,973 441 3,125
2,842 432 2,988
3,853 493 4,050
3,853 493 4,050
Resolution No. 96-096
Page 4
Class Title
Plumbing/Mechanical Specialist#
Police Clerk **
Principal Librarian*
Principal Planner*
Principal Plans Examiner~
Programmer/Analyst#
Public Services Technician
Public Works Engineer.2
Public Works Inspector 12
Public Works Inspector II 2
Public Works Inspector II NPDES 2
Public Works Maintenance Mgr.2
Purchasing Agent*
Receptionist
Records Clerk
Records Manager/City Clerk*
Recreation Coordinator
Recreation Superintendent*
Recreation Supervisor#
Redevelopment Analyst#
Redevelopment Manager+
Rehabilitation Specialist#2
Resource Services Supervisor#
Risk Management Analyst#
Secretary~
Senior Account Technician
Senior Accountant
Senior Admin Secretaryx
Senior Business License Technician
Senior Civil Engineer*
Senior GIS Technician
Senior Information Systems Analyst#
Senior Maintenance Worker2
Senior Planner*
Senior Plans Examiner-Bldg#
Senior Plans Examiner-Fire#
Senior Records Clerk
Senior Redevelopment Analyst*
Signal & Lighting Technician~
Special Districts Supervisor~
Special Districts Technician
Special Districts Technician II
Stadium Event Manager*
Minimum
Step Amount
Control
Point
Step Amount
Maximum
Step Amount
443 3,156 483 3,853 493 4,050
326 1,761 366 2,150 376 2,260
469 3,593 509 4,386 519 4,611
510 4,408 550 5,382 560 5,657
469 3,593 509 4,386 519 4,611
459 3,418 499 4,173 509 4,386
374 2,237 414 2,731 424 2,871
509 4,386 549 5,355 559 5,629
406 2,624 446 3,204 456 3,367
426 2,899 466 3,540 476 3,721
426 2,899 466 3,540 476 3,721
517 4,565 557 5,573 567 5,858
492 4,030 532 4,919 542 5,171
310 1,626 350 1,985 360 2,086
320 1,709 360 2,086 370 3,193
517 4,565 557 5,573 567 5,858
400 2,547 440 3,109 450 3,268
505 4,300 545 5,249 555 5,517
430 2,958 470 3,611 480 3,796
451 3,284 491 4,010 501 4,215
546 5,275 586 6,440 616 7,481
443 3,156 483 3,853 493 4,050
461 3,452 501 4,215 511 4,430
432 2,908 472 3,647 482 3,834
353 2,015 393 2,459 403 2,585
393 2,459 433 3,002 443 3,156
461 3,452 501 4,215 511 4,430
391 2,435 431 2,973 441 3,125
392 2,447 432 2,988 442 3,140
519 4,611 559 5,629 569 5,916
426 2,899 466 3,540 476 3,721
456 3,367 496 4,111 506 4,321
363 2,118 403 2,585 413 2,717
491 4,010 531 4,895 541 5,145
463 3,487 503 4,257 513 4,475
463 3,487 503 4,257 513 4,475
330 1,796 370 2,193 380 2,305
481 3,815 521 4,657 531 4,895
431 2,973 471 3,629 481 3,815
461 3,452 501 4,215 511 4,430
393 2,459 433 3,002 443 3,156
413 2,717 453 3,317 463 3,487
517 4,565 557 5,573 567 5,858
Resolution No. 96-096
Page 5
Class Title
Street/Storm Drain Maint Supt.2
Structural Specialist#2
Supervising Animal Control Officer~
Supervising Public Works Insp#2
Systems Analyst#
Technician
Traffic Engineer*
Control
Minimum Point Maximum
Step Amount Step Amount Step Amount
487 3,930 527 4,798 537 5,044
443 3,156 483 3,853 493 4,050
396 2,497 436 3,048 446 3,204
456 3,367 496 4,111 506 4,321
478 3,758 518 4,588 528 4,822
377 2,271 417 2,772 427 2,914
524 4,727 564 5,771 574 6,066
Admin Intern 296 8.75 336 10.68 346 11.22
Assistant Pool Manager 281 8.12 321 9.91 331 10.95
Crossing Guard 216 5.87 256 7.16 266 7.53
Instructor/Guard I 216 5.87 256 7.16 266 7.53
Instructor/Guard II 256 7.16 296 8.75 306 9.19
Library Aide 167 4.60 207 5.61 217 5.90
Library Clerk 322 9.96 362 12.16 372 12.78
Library Page 207 5.61 247 6.85 257 7.20
Library Page II 256 7.16 296 8.75 266 7.53
Maintenance Technician 256 7.16 296 8.75 266 7.53
Planning Aide 296 8.75 336 10.68 346 11.22
Pool Manager 305 9.15 345 11.17 355 11.74
Program Specialist 287 8.36 327 10.21 337 10.73
Recreation Aide 177 4.83 217 5.90 227 6.20
Recreation Assistant I 216 5.87 256 7.16 266 7.53
Recreation Assistant II 242 6.68 282 8.16 292 8.57
Recreation Leader 266 7.53 306 9.19 316 9.66
This classification when assigned to shifts other than day shift shall have additional pay of 40¢ per
hour.
When acting as Clerk to Council/Commissions $50 paid per night or weekend day meeting.
Compensatory time off can be substituted in lieu of $50 at the option of the employee.
Up to $150 provided annually toward purchase ofapproved safety footwear from a city designed
vendor.
# Denotes Supervisory/Professional Class
* Denotes Management Class
+ Denotes Executive Class
Resolution No. 96-096
Page 6
Executive Management employees will be assigned to salary ranges which are no less
than 20% (40 salary code steps) below the control point and no more than 15% (30
salary code steps) above the control point. All other employees will be assigned to
salary ranges which are no less than 20% (40 salary code steps) below the control point
and no more than 5% (10 salary code steps) above the control point. Actual salary
within the range is determined by performance, achievement of goals and objectives, or
for recent appointments, growth within the position.
SECTION 3: Three Tiered Management Program
Employees designated as either Professional/Supervisory, Management, or Executive
Management are not eligible for overtime pay, or compensatory time for working hours
over and above the normal daily work schedule. Employees so designated shall be
entitled to all benefits provided to general employees and the following:
Supervisory/Professional
A. Administrative leave to a maximum of 50 hours per fiscal year. Days off must
be approved by appropriate supervisor, after successful completion of six
months service within this classification.
B. Life insurance policy of an additional $20,000.
C. Deferred compensation program of 2% of salary.
Management
A. Administrative leave to a maximum of 75 hours per fiscal year. Days off must
be approved by appropriate supervisor, after successful completion of six
months service within this classification.
B. Life insurance policy of an additional $20,000.
C. Deferred compensation program of 4% of salary.
Executive Management
A. Administrative leave to a maximum of 100 hours per fiscal year. Days off must
be approved by appropriate supervisor, after successful completion of six
months service within this classification.
B. Life insurance policy of an additional $30,000.
C. Deferred compensation program of 6% of salary.
D. Automobile allowance of $250 per month if a City vehicle is not provided.
Resolution No. 96-096
Page 7
SECTION 4: Life Insurance
The City provides $30,000 base coverage of life insurance for all employees.
Employees who want to purchase additional life insurance coverage with personal funds
may do so at the City's group rate.
SECTION 5: Health Insurance
The City provides health insurance plans available to all full time continuous salaried
employees and elected officials. The City agrees to average the cost of medical
insurance for all current employees as one group, providing for no additional payment
by employees for coverage through June 30, 1997. The City will provide up to $337 per
month in medical coverage for all full time employees hired after July 1, 1994.
SECTION 6: Retiree Medical
Employees who retire at the age of 55 or above with ten years of service with the City
of Rancho Cucamonga can pay for medical insurance at a group rate through the City
until 18 months prior to the age of 65 at which time they can convert to Cobra.
SECTION 7: Dental Insurance
The City shall provide a dental insurance plan for all full-time continuous salaried
employees and elected officials. The City agrees to average the cost of dental insurance
for all full time continuous salaried employees and elected officials effective July 1,
1996.
SECTION 8: Optical Insurance
The City shall provide an optical insurance plan for all full-time continuous salaried
employees and elected officials. The City agrees to average the cost of optical insurance
for all full time continuous salaried employees and elected officials effective July 1,
1996.
SECTION 9: Bereavement Leave
When a death occurs in the family of a full time employee, the employee shall be
granted up to five (5) bereavement leave days with pay. Family members are defined
as follows: employee's spouse, employee's parents, employee's grandparents,
employee's children, employee's spouse's parents, siblings, a blood relative residing
with employee. The department head and the City Manager shall approve such
bereavement leave.
Resolution No. 96-096
Page 8
SECTION 10: Personal Leave
Employees can use up to 20 hours of accrued sick leave, vacation, or holiday time as
personal leave. This 20 hours can be used incrementally (i.e., 1 hour, ~ hour)
throughout the fiscal year. Use of this time is for situations requiring the employee's
attention and needs to be cleared with their supervisor when using this time. Personal
leave can be taken after six months service.
SECTION 11: Vacation
All full4ime employees shall, with continuous service, accrue working hours of vacation
monthly according to the following schedule. Vacation can be taken after six months
service.
Length of Service Hours Accrued Annual Hours
in Years Per Pay Period Accrued
1 3.077 80
2 3.461 90
3 3.846 100
4 4.230 110
5 4.615 120
6-8 5.000 130
9 5.384 140
10 5.769 150
11-13 6.153 160
14 6.538 170
15+ 6.923 180
SECTION 12: Sick Leave
All full-time employees shall, with continuous service, accrue 120 hours of sick leave
annually. Sick leave can be taken after six months service.
SECTION 13: Sick Leave Buy Back
Employees who terminate their city employment after 5 years of continuous service and
have at least 50% of five years' sick leave accrued on the books upon termination can
sell 120 hours back to the City.
SECTION 14: Holidays
The City Offices shall observe the following 14 holidays. All full time continuous
salaried employees shall be compensated at their regular rate for these days.
Resolution No. 96-096
Page 9
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(s)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
July 4, 1996 -Independence Day
September 2, 1996 -Labor Day -first Monday in September
November 11, 1996 -Veteran's Day
November 28 -Thanksgiving Day
November 29 -Day following Thanksgiving (floater)
December 24, 1996 -The day preceding Christmas (floater)
December 25, 1996 -Christmas Day
January 1, 1997 -New Years
January 20, 1997 -Martin Luther King's Birthday
February 17, 1997 -President's Day
May 26, 1997 -Memorial Day
Three discretionary days may be taken by an employee at his/her
convenience after six months service subject to approval of the
department head. Days may not be carried over from one fiscal year to
the next.
Whenever a holiday falls on a Sunday, the following Monday shall be observed as a
holiday. Whenever a holiday falls on a Friday or Saturday, the preceding Thursday shall
be observed as the holiday.
When a holiday combination occurs (Thanksgiving, Christmas, etc) where two
consecutive days are holidays and it would result in the City Hall being open to serve
the public only 2 days during the week, only one of the holidays will be observed and
the other holiday will become a floating holiday. For example, for Thanksgiving,
Thursday will be observed as the regular holiday, however Friday will become a floating
holiday to be used at a later date. For Christmas, Wednesday will be observed as the
regular holiday, however Tuesday (the day preceding Christmas) will become a floating
holiday to be used at a later date. In the instance of Thanksgiving, Christmas, or New
Years, employees will have until June 30 to use those floating holidays accrued between
Thanksgiving and New years. Also, those days will not accrue as floating holidays until
the actual holiday has occurred. Each year the City will designate which days will be
observed and which are floating holidays.
For fiscal year 96-97 floating holidays will be provided for the day following
Thanksgiving and the day preceding Christmas.
SECTION 15: Holiday Time
The City agrees that employees who are assigned to work on a holiday, whether or not
their regular shif~ assignment requires they work that day, are eligible for pay at time
and one-half for working that day. This time and one-half may be taken as
compensation or put in a compensatory time off bank, (in effect, compensating at double
time and one-hal0. That rate of compensation is tallied as follows: the ten hours
compensation for the holiday, plus compensation at time and one-half for the hours
actually worked. This payment at time and one-half abrogates the employees right to
that holiday.
Resolution No. 96-096
Page 10
SECTION 16: Premium Holiday Compensation
Maintenance employees required as part of the regular work assignment to work on
Christmas Day, New Years Day, Independence Day or Thanksgiving Day, are allowed
to observe the holiday on another day. Additionally, these employees who work on the
aforementioned designated holidays may select to receive compensation on that holiday
at time and one-half for the ten hour shift, or take a second holiday as time off at a later
date.
SECTION 17: Natal and Adoption Leave without Pay
Employees are granted up to four months natal and adoption leave for the birth or
adoption of a child. Employees on this leave of absence without pay will be responsible
for the payment of medical, dental and optical premiums to keep the coverage in force
during the leave of absence.
SECTION 18: Natal and Adoption Leave with Pay
Employees are granted up to 2 days natal and adoption leave with pay for the birth or
adoption of a child. Any paid time required beyond this initial 2 days must be charged
to sick leave, vacation, compensatory or floating holiday time.
SECTION 19: Military Leave
Employees required to serve military leave will be compensated pursuant to the Military
and Veterans Code. To qualify for compensation the military orders must be submitted
to the supervisor prior to their tour of duty and must be attached to the time card for that
pay period.
SECTION 20: Military Service Buy Back
Employees have the option for military service buy back at the employee's expense.
SECTION 21: Overtime-Maintenance
The City agrees that employees who are sent home to rest and to be available to work
additional hours as a result of a storm or impending emergency situation and are not
subsequently recalled to work, will be compensated for the hours not worked in that
shift, due to them having been sent home, to bring the total hours to 10 worked in that
shift.
Employees who are subsequently recalled to work the storm or emergency situation will
work no more than 12 consecutive hours. Any hours worked in excess of 10 in that 12
hour shift will be paid at time and one-half, regardless of the total numbers of
compensated hours for that work week.
Resolution No. 96-096
Page 11
SECTION 22: Standby Pay
Employees required to be on standby shall be compensated at the rate of $150 per week.
SECTION 23: Safety Footwear
The City will provide up to $150 annually toward the purchase of safety footwear at a
city designated vendor for employees required to wear safety footwear as part of their
job responsibilities.
SECTION 24:
The City Manager's contract #89-037 is renewed for fiscal year 1996-97.
SECTION 25:
City Councilmembers have the option to join PERS; members contribution to be paid
by Councilmember. City Councilmembers are eligible for a $200 per month car
allowance.
SECTION 26: Confidential Employees
Confidential employees are designated as such when an employee in the course of his
or her duties, has access to information relating to the City's administration of
employer-employee relations. Employees designated as confidential employees may
not act as representatives of employee organizations which represent other employees
of the City. The employees designated as confidential employees are as follows:
Personnel Analyst
Personnel Clerk
Benefits Technician
Account Technician-Payroll
Office Specialist II-Admin Svc
Secretary
Planning Commission Secretary
Admin Secretary
Sr Admin Secretary
Risk Management Analyst
Deputy City Clerk
Records Clerk
Records Manager/City Clerk
SECTION 27:
The provisions of the amended sections of this resolution are effective July 1, 1996.
Resolution No. 96-096
Page 12
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 19th day of June, 1996.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
William J. Alexander, Mayor
ATTEST:
Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk
I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City ofRancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify
that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 19th day of
June, 1996.
Executed this 20th day of June, 1996, at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk
Resolution No. 96-096
Page 12
BASIC
SCHEDULE I -- SALARY CODE TABLE
PAY SCHEDULE IN HOURLY, BI-WEEKLY AND MONTHLY AMOUNTS
ONE HALF PERCENT BETWEEN RANGES
MONTHLY AMOUNTS ROUNDED TO NEAREST DOLLAR
Range
Number
151.
152.
153.
154.
155.
156.
157.
158.
159.
160.
161.
162.
163.
164.
165.
166.
167.
168.
169.
170.
171.
172.
173.
174.
175.
176.
177.
178.
179.
180.
181.
182.
183.
184.
185.
186.
187.
188.
189.
190.
Hourly
Rate
4.2439
4.2651
4.2865
4.3079
4.3294
4.3511
4.3728
4.3947
4.4167
4.4388
4.4620
4.4833
4.5057
4.5282
4.5508
4.5736
4.5965
4.6194
4.6425
4.6658
4.7891
4.7125
4.7361
4.7598
4.7836
4.8075
4.8315
4.8557
4.8800
4.9044
4.9289
4.9535
4.9783
5.0032
5.0282
5.0533
5.0786
5.1040
5.1295
5.1552
Bi-Weekly Monthly Range Hourly
Rate Rate Nm"~r Rate
339.5134 736 191. 5.1809
341.2109 739 192. 5.2069
342.9170 743 193. 5.2329
344.6316 747 194. 5.2591
346.3547 750 195. 5.2853
348.0865 754 196. 5.3118
349.8269 758 197. 5.3383
351.5761 762 198. 5.3650
353.3340 766 199. 5-3919
355.1006 769 200. 5.4188
356.8761 773 201. 5.4459
358.6605 777 202. 5.4731
360.4538 781 203. 5.5005
362.2561 785 204. 5.5280
364.0674 789 205. 5.5556
365.8877 793 206. 5.5834
367.7171 797 207. 5.6113
369.5557 801 208. 5.6394
371.4035 805 209. 5.6676
373.2605 809 210. 5.6959
375.1268 813 211. 5.7244
377.0025 817 212. 5.7530
378.8875 821 213. 5.7818
380.7819 825 214. 5.8107
382.6858 829 215. 5.8398
384.5992 833 216. 5.8690
386.5222 837 217. 5.8983
388.4548 842 218. 5.9278
390.3971 846 219. 5.9574
392.3491 850 220. 5.9872
394~3109 854 221. 6.0172
396.2824 859 222. 6.0472
398.2638 863 223. 6.0775
400.2551 867 224. 6.1079
402.2564 872 225. 6.1384
404.2677 876 226. 6.1691
406.2890 880 227. 6.1999
408.3205 885 228. 6.2309
410.3621 889 229. 6.2521
412.4139 894 230. 6.2934
Bi-Weekly
Rate
414.4760
416.5483
418.6311
420.7242
422.8279
424.9420
427.0667
429.2020
431.3481
433.5048
435.6723
437.8507
440.0399
442.2401
444.4513
446.6736
448.9070
451.1515
453.4073
455.6743
457.9527
460.2424
462.5436
464.8564
467.1806
469.5165
471.8641
474.2234
476.5946
478.9775
481.3724
483.7793
486.1982
488.6292
491.0723
493.5277
495.9953
498.4753
500.9677
503.4725
Monthly
Rate
898
903
907
912
916
921
925
930
935
939
944
949
953
958
963
968
973
977
982
987
992
997
1002
1007
1012
1017
1022
1027
1033
1038
1043
1048
1053
1059
1064
1069
1075
1080
1085
1091
Resolution No. 96-096
Page 13
Range
Number
231.
232.
233.
234.
235.
236.
237.
238.
239.
240.
241.
242.
243.
244.
245.
246.
247.
248.
249.
250.
251.
252.
253.
254.
255.
256.
257.
258.
259.
260.
261.
262.
263.
264.
265.
266.
267.
268.
269.
270.
271.
272.
273.
274.
275.
276.
277.
278.
279.
280.
Hourly
Rate
6.3249
6.3565
6.3883
6.4202
6.4523
6.4846
6.5170
6.5496
6.5823
6.6153
6.6483
6.6816
6.7150
6.7486
6.7823
6.8162
6.8503
6.8845
6.9190
6.9536
6.9883
?.O233
7.0584
7.0937
7.1291
7.1648
7.2006
7.2366
7.2728
7.3092
7.3457
7.3824
7.4193
7.4564
7.4937
7.5312
7.5689
7.6067
7.6447
7.6830
7.7214
7.7600
7.7988
7.8378
7.8770
7.9163
7.9559
7.9957
8.0357
8.0759
Bi-Weekly
Rate
505.9899
508.5198
511.0624
513.6177
516.1858
518.7667
521.3606
523.9674
526.5872
529.2202
531.8663
534.5256
537.1982
539.8842
542.5836
545.2965
548.0230
550.7631
553.5170
556.2845
559.0660
561.8613
564.6706
567.4940
570.3314
573.1831
576.0490
578.9292
581.8239
584.7330
587.6567
590.5950
593.5479
596.5157
599.4982
602.4957
605.5082
608.5358
611.5784
614.6363
617.7095
620.7981
623.9021
626.0216
630.1567
633.3075
636.4740
639.6564
642.8546
645.0689
Monthly
Rate
1096
1102
1107
1113
1118
1124
1130
1135
1141
1147
1152
1158
1164
1170
1176
1181
1187
1193
1199
1205
1211
1217
1223
1230
1236
1242
1248
1254
1261
1267
1273
1280
1286
1292
1299
1305
1312
1318
1325
1332
1338
1345
1352
1359
1365
1372
1379
1386
1393
1400
Range Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly
N~"'~r Rate Rate Rate
281.
282.
283.
284.
285.
286.
289.
290.
291.
292.
293.
294.
295.
296.
297.
298.
299.
300.
301.
302.
303.
304.
305.
306.
307.
308.
309.
310.
311.
312.
313.
314.
315.
316.
317.
318.
319.
320.
321.
322.
323.
324.
325.
326.
327.
328.
329.
330.
8.1162
8.1568
8.1976
8.2386
8.2798
8.3212
8.3628
8.4046
8.4466
8.4889
8.5313
8.5740
8.6168
8.6599
8.7032
8.7467
8.7905
8.8344
8.8786
8.9230
8.9676
9.0124
9.0575
9.1028
9.1483
9.1940
9.2400
9.2862
9.3326
9-3793
9.4262
9.4733
9.5207
9.5683
9.6161
9.6642
9.7125
9.7611
9.8099
9.8590
9.9083
9.9578
10.0076
10.0576
10.1079
10.1585
10.2092
10.2603
lo.3116
10.3632
648.2993 1407
652.5458 1414
655.8085 1421
659.0875 1428
662.3830 1435
665.6949 1442
669.0234 1450
672.3685 1457
675.7303 1464
679.1090 1471
682.5045 1479
685.9170 1486
689.3466 1494
692.7933 1501
696.2573 1509
699.7386 1516
703.2373 1524
706.7535 1531
710.2872 1539
713.8387 1547
717.4079 1554
720.9949 1562
724.5999 1570
728.2229 1578
731.8640 1586
735.5233 1594
739.2009 1602
742.8969 1610
746.6114 1618
750.3445 1626
754.0962 1634
757.8667 1642
761.6560 1650
765.4643 1659
769.2916 1667
773.1381 1675
777.0038 1684
780.8888 1692
784.7932 1700
788.7172 1709
792.6608 1717
796.6241 1726
800.6072 1735
804.6103 1743
808.6333 1752
812.6765 1761
816.7399 1770
820.8236 1778
824.9277 1787
829.0523 1796
Resolution No. 96-096
Page 14
Range Hourly
l~r Rate
Bi-Weekly
Rate
331. 10.4150 833.1976
332. 10.4670 837.3636
333. 10.5194 841.5504
334. 10.5720 845.7 81
335. 10.6248 849.9~69
336. 10.6780 854.2369
337. 10.7314 858.5080
338. 10.7850 862.8006
339. 10.8389 867.1146
340. 10.8931 871.4502
341. 10.9476 875.8074
342. 11.0023 880.1864
343. 11.0573 884.5874
344. 11.1126 889.0103
345. 11.1682 893.4554
346. 11.2240 897.9226
347. 11.2802 902.4123
348. 11.3366 906.9243
350. 11. 916.0162
351. 11.5075 920.5963
352. 11.5650 925.1993
353- 11.6228 929.8253
354. 11.6809 934.4744
355. 11.7393 939.1468
356. 11.7980 943.8425
357. 11.8570 948.5617
358. 11.9163 953.3045
359. 11.9759 958.0711
360. 12.0358 962.8614
361. 12.0959 967.6757
362. 12.1564 972.5141
363. 12.2172 977.376
364. 12.2783 982.263~
365. 12.3397 987.1749
366. 12.4014 992.1108
367. 12.4634 997.0713
368. 12.5257 1002.0567
369. 12.5883 1007.0669
370. 12.6513 1012.1023
371. 12.7145 1017.1628
3?3. 12. .
1027 3598
3?4. 12.9062 1032.4966
3?5. 12.9707 1037.6591
3?6. 13.0356 1042.8474
3??. 13.1008 1048.0617
3?8. 13.1663 1053.3020
3?9. 13.2321 1058.5685
380. 13.2983 1063.8613
Monthly
Rate
1805
1814
1823
1832
1842
1851
1860
1869
1879
1888
1898
1907
1917
1926
1936
1945
1955
1965
1995
2005
2015
2025
2035
2045
2055
2065
2076
2086
2097
2107
2118
2128
2139
2150
2160
2171
2182
2193
2204
2215
2226
2237
2248
2260
2271
2282
2294
2305
Range
381.
382.
383.
384.
385.
386.
387.
388.
389.
390.
391.
392.
393.
394.
395.
396.
397.
398.
399.
400.
401.
402.
403.
404.
405.
406.
407.
408.
409.
410.
411.
412.
413.
414.
415.
416.
417.
418.
419.
420.
421.
422.
423.
424.
425.
426.
427.
428.
429.
430.
Hourly
Rate
13.3648
13.4316
13.4987
13.5662
13.6341
13.7022
13.7707
13.8396
13.9088
13.9783
14.0482
14.1185
14.1891
14.2600
14.3313
14.4030
14.4750
14.5474
14.6201
14.6932
14.7667
14.8405
14.9147
14.9893
15.0642
15.1395
15.2152
15.2913
15.3678
15.4446
15.5218
15.5994
15.6774
15.7558
15.8346
15.9138
15.9933
16.0733
16.1537
16.2344
16.3156
16.3972
16.4792
16.5616
16.6444
16.7276
16.8112
16.8953
16.9798
17.0647
Bi-Weekly
Rate
1069.1806
1074.5265
1079.8992
1085.2987
1090.7252
1096.1788
1101.6597
1107.1680
1112.7038
1118.2673
1123.8587
1129.4780
1135.1254
1140.8010
1146.5050
1152.2375
1157.9987
1163.7887
1169.6076
1175.4557
1181.3329
1187.2396
1193.1758
1199.1417
1205.1374
1211.1631
1217.2189
1223.3050
1229.4215
1235.5686
1241.7465
1247.9552
1254.1950
1260.4660
1266.7683
1273.1021
1279.4676
1285.8650
1292.2943
1298.7558
1305.2496
1311.7758
1318.3347
1324.9264
1331.5510
1338.2087
1344.8998
1351.6243
1358.3824
1365.1743
Monthly
Rate
2317
2328
2340
2351
2363
2375
2387
2399
2411
2423
2435
2447
2459
2472
2484
2497
2509
2522
2534
2547
2560
2598
2611
2624
263?
2650
2664
26??
2690
2704
2717
2731
2745
2758
2772
2786
2800
2814
2828
2842
2856
2871
2885
2899
2914
2929
2943
2958
51
Resolution No. 96-096
Page 15
Range
431·
432.
433·
434.
435.
436·
437·
438.
439·
440·
441.
442.
443.
444.
445.
446.
447.
448.
449.
450.
451.
452.
453·
454·
455.
456.
457·
458.
459·
460·
461·
462·
463·
464·
465·
466.
469·
470.
471.
472·
473·
474.
475·
476.
477·
478.
479.
480·
Hourly
Rate
17.1500
17.2358
17.3219
17.4085
17.4956
17.5831
17·6710
17.7593
17·8481
17.9374
18·0271
18.1172
18.
18.3903
18.4823
18.5747
18.6577
18. 609
18.~547
18.9490
19.0437
19.1389
19.2346
19.3308
19.4274
19.5246
19.6222
19.7203
19.8189
19.9180
20.0176
20·1177
20.2183
20.~210
· 194
20
20
20.7288
20.8325
20.9366
21.0413
21.1465
21.2522
21.3585
21.4653
21.5726
21.6805
21.7889
21.8978
Bi-Weekly
Rate
1372.0002
1378.8602
1385.7545
1392.6833
1399.6467
1406.6449
1413.6781
1420.7465
1427.8503
1434.9895
1442.1645
1449·3753
1456·6222
1463·9053
1471·2248
1478.5809
1485.9738
1493.4037
1500.8707
1508.3751
1515.9169
1523.4965
1531·1140
1538·7696
1546.4634
1554.1957
1561.9667
1569·7766
1577·6254
1585.5136
1593.4411
1601.4083
1609·4154
1617·4625
1625.5498
1633·6775
1641.8459
1650.0551
1658.3054
1666.5969
1674.9299
1683.3046
1691.7211
1717.2240
1725.8101
1734.4392
1743.1114
1751.8269
Monthly
Rate
2973
2988
3002
3017
3033
3048
3063
3078
3094
3109
3125
3140
3156
3172
3188
3204
3220
3236
3252
6
32 8
3284
3301
3317
3334
3351
3367
3384
3401
3418
3435
3452
3470
3487
3505
3522
3540
3557
3575
3593
3611
3629
3647
3665
3684
3702
3721
3739
3758
3777
3796
Range
~r
481.
482·
483.
484.
485.
486·
487.
488·
489·
490.
491·
492·
493.
494·
495.
496.
497·
498.
499·
500.
501.
502.
503.
504·
505.
506.
507.
508.
509.
510.
511·
512.
513.
514.
515.
516.
517·
518.
519.
520.
521.
522.
523.
524.
525.
526.
527.
528·
529.
530.
Hourly
Rate
22.0073
22·1174
22.2279
22·3391
22.4508
22.5630
22.6759
22.7892
22.9032
23·0177
23.1328
23·2484
23.3647
23·4815
23.5989
23.7169
23.8355
23.9547
24.0745
24.1948
24.3158
24.4374
24.5596
24·6824
24·8058
24.9298
25.0545
25.1797
25·3056
25.4321
Bi-Weekly Monthly
Rate Rate
1760·5861 3815
1769.3890 3834
1778·2359 3853
1787.1271 3872
1796·0627 3891
1814. 393O
1823.1386 395O
1832.2543 397O
1841.4156 399O
1850·6227 4010
1859·8758 4030
1869·1752 4050
1878.5210 4070
1887.9136 4090
1897.3532 4111
1906.8400 4131
1916.3742 4152
1925.9560 4173
1935.5858 4194
1945.2637 4215
1954.9901 4236
1964.7650 4257
1974.5888 4278
1984.4618 4300
1994.3841 4321
2004.3560 4343
2014.3778 4364
2024.4497 4386
2034.5719 4408
25.5593 2044.7448 4430
25.6871 2054·9685 4452
25·8155 1065.2434 4475
25.9446 2075.5696 4497
26.0743 2085.9474 4520
26.2047 2096.3772 4542
26.3357 2106.8590 4565
26.4674 2117.3933 4588
26.5998 2127.9803 4611
26.7328 2138.6202 4634
26.8664 2149.3133 4657
2?. 2170.8602 4?04
27.2714 2181.7145 4?2?
2?.40?8 2192.6230 4751
2?.5448 2203.5862 4??4
2?.6826 2214.6041 4?98
27.8210 2225.6771 4822
27.9601 2236.8055 4846
28.0999 224?.9895 4871
Resolution No. 96-096
Page 16
Range Hourly Bi-Weekly
N'~r Rate Hate
531. 28.2404 2259.2295
532. 28.3816 2270.5256
533. 28.5235 2281.8783
534. 28.6661 2293.2876
535. 28.8094 2304 4
·75 1
536. 28.9535 2316.2779
537. 29.0982 2327.8592
538. 29.2437 2339.4985
539. 29.3900 2351.1960
540. 29.5369 2362.9520
541. 29.6846 2374.7668
542. 29.8330 2386.6406
543. 29.9822 2398.5738
544. 30.1321 2410.5667
545. 30.2827 2422.6195
546. 30.4342 2434.7326
547. 30.5863 2446.9063
548. 30.7393 2459.1408
549. 30.8930 2471.4365
550. 31.0474 2483.7937
551. 31.2027 2496.2127
552. 31.3587 2508.6937
553. 31.5155 2521.2372
554. 31.6730 8434
51
556. 31.9906 2559.2452
557. 32.1505 2572.0414
. 2597.
560. 32.6352 2610.8152
561. 32.7984 2623.8693
562. 32.9624 2626.9886
563. 33.1272 2650.1736
564. 33.2928 2663.4245
565. 33.4593 2676.7416
566. 33.6266 2690.1253
567. 33.7947 2703.5759
568. 33.9637 2717.0938
569. 34.1335 2730.6793
570. 34.3042 2744.3327
571. 34.4757 2758.0543
572. 34.6481 2771.8446
573. 34.8213 2785.7038
574. 34.9954 6323
576. 35.3462 2827.6987
577. 35.5230 2841.8371
578. 35.7006 2856.0463
579. 35.8791 2870.3266
580. 36.0585 2884.6782
Monthly
Rate
4895
4919
4944
4969
4994
5019
5044
5069
5094
5120
5145
5171
5197
5223
5249
5275
5302
5328
5355
5382
5408
5436
5463
5490
5517
5545
5573
5601
5629
5657
5685
5713
5742
5771
5800
5829
5858
5887
5916
5946
5976
6006
6036
6066
6096
6127
6157
6188
6219
6250
Range
581.
582.
583.
584.
585.
586.
587.
588.
589.
590.
591.
592.
593.
594.
595.
596.
597.
598.
599.
600.
601.
602.
603.
604.
605.
606.
607.
608.
609.
610.
611.
612.
613.
614.
615.
616.
617.
618.
619.
620.
621.
622.
623.
624.
625.
626.
627.
628.
629.
630.
Hourly
Rate
36.2388
36.4200
36.6021
36.7851
36.9690
37.1538
37.3396
37.5263
37.7139
37.9025
38.0920
38.2825
38.4739
38.6663
38.8596
39.0539
39.2492
39.4454
39.6426
39.8409
40.0401
40.2403
40.4415
40.6437
40.8469
41.0512
41.2564
41.4627
41.6700
41.8784
42.0878
42.2982
42.5097
42.7222
42.9358
43.1505
43.3663
43.5831
43.8010
44.0200
44.240
44.461
44.683
44.906
45.131
45.357
45.584
45.812
46.O41
46.271
Bi-Weekly
Rate
2899.1016
2913.5971
2928.1651
2942.8059
2957.5199
2972.3075
2987.1691
3002.1049
3017.1154
3032.2010
3047.3620
3062.5988
3077.9118
3093.3014
3108.7679
3124.3117
3139.9333
3155.6330
3171.4111
3187.2682
3203.2045
3219.2206
3235.3167
3251.4932
3267.7507
3284.0895
3300.5100
3317.0125
3333.5975
3350.2655
3367.0168
3383.8519
3400.7712
3417.7750
3434.8639
3452.0382
3469.2984
3486.6449
3504.0781
3521.5985
3539.206
3556.902
3574.687
3592.560
3610.523
3628.576
3646.719
3664.953
3683.278
3701.694
Monthly
Rate
6281
63t3
6344
6376
6408
6440
6472
6505
6537
6570
6603
6636
6669
6702
6736
6769
6803
6837
6871
6906
6941
6976
7011
7046
7081
7117
7152
7188
7224
7260
7296
7333
7370
7407
7444
7481
7518
7556
7594
7632
7670
7709
7747
7786
7825
7864
7903
7943
7983
8023
Resolution No. 96-096
Page 17
Range
Number
631.
632.
633.
634.
635.
636.
637.
638.
639.
640.
641.
642.
643.
644.
645.
646.
647.
648.
649.
650.
651.
652.
653.
654.
655.
656.
657.
658.
659.
660.
661.
662.
663.
664.
665.
666.
667.
668.
669.
670.
Hourly
Rate
46.502
46.735
46.969
47.204
47.440
47.677
47.915
48.155
48.396
48.638
48.881
49.125
49.371
49.618
49.866
50.115
50.366
50.618
50.871
51.125
51.381
51.638
51.896
52.155
52.420
52.683
52.943
53.208
53.474
53.741
54.010
54.280
54.551
54.824
55.098
55.373
55.650
55.928
56.208
56.489
Bi-Weekly
Rate
3720.202
3738.803
3757.497
3776.284
3795.165
3814.141
3833.212
3852.378
3871.640
3890.998
3910.453
3930.005
3949.655
3969.403
3989.250
4009.196
4029.242
4049.388
4069.635
4089.983
4110.433
4130.985
4151.640
4172.400
4193.262
4214.230
4235.301
4256.478
4277.760
4299.150
4320.646
4342.249
4363.906
4385.780
4407.709
4429.748
4451.897
4474.156
4496.527
4519.010
Monthly
Rate
8063
8103
8144
8184
8225
8267
8308
8349
8391
8433
8475
8518
8560
8603
8646
8689
8733
8776
8820
8864
8908
8952
8996
9040
9085
9130
9175
9220
9266
9312
9359
9406
9453
9500
9548
9596
9644
9692
9740
9789
Range
Number
671.
672.
673.
674.
675.
676.
677.
678.
679.
680.
Hourly
Rate
56.771
57.055
57.340
57.627
57.915
58.205
58.496
58.788
59.082
59.377
Bi-Weekly Monthly
Rate Rate
4541.605 9838
4564.313 9887
4587.135 9936
4610.071 9986
4633.121 10,036
4656.287 10,086
4679.568 10,137
~702.966 10,188
4726.481 10,239
4750.113 10,290
681. 59.674 4773.864 10,341
682. 59.972 4797.733 10,393
683. 60.272 4821.722 10,445
684. 60.573 4845.831 10,497
685. 60.876 4870.060 10,550
686. 61.180 4894.410 10,603
687. 61.486 4918.881 10,656
688. 61.793 4943.476 10,709
689. 62.102 4968.193 10,763
690. 62.413 4993.034 10,816
691. 62.725 5017.999 10,870
692. 63.039 5043.089 10,925
693. 63.354 5068.304 10,979
694. 63.671 5093.646 11,034
695. 63.989 5119.114 11,090
696. 64.309 5144.710 11,145
697. 64.631 5170.434 11,201
698. 64.954 5196.286 11,257
699. 65.279 5222.267 11,313
700. 65.605 5248.378 11,370
701
702
703
704
705
65.933
66.263
66.594
66.927
67.261
5274.620 11,426
5300.992 11,483
5327.496 11,540
5354.133 11,597
5380.903 11,654
DATE:
TO:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
June 19, 1996
Mayor, Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
Suzanne Ota, Community Services Manager
Kathy Sorensen, Recreation Superintenden~5'~I
LIGHT VARIANCE REQUEST FOR CITY LITTLE LEAGUE
CHAMPIONSHIP BASEBALL TOURNAMENT AT RED HILL PARK ON
SIXTY AND NINETY FOOT FIELDS UNTIL 10:30 P.M.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of a temporary variance of the Light Usage Policy to allow for light use
until 10:30 p.m. on the 60' and 90' fields at Red Hill Park June 21, 24, 25 and 27. Game times are
to be 5:30 and 7:30 for two game nights and 6:00 p.m. for single game nights.
BACKGROUND
The current sports field light policy curfew is 10:00 p.m. Similar toumaments have been hosted over
the past several years and variances have been permitted. No complaints from residents have been
received. This toumament has only city resident teams playing and the winner in each age bracket
will be a city champion. In recent years the Council and Commission have approved a curfew
variance only to accommodate extra inning play.
ANALYSIS
The requested variance would apply to only the 60' and 90' base path field(s) located at Red Hill
Park. Staff requests the Council continue with their current policy of providing curfew variance only
for extended, overtime or extra innings which is necessary for tournament play. This use of lights
until 10:30 p.m. is in accordance with the Councils past approval practices.
As in the past, the Leagues are to provide the City with a draft of the notice to the neighbors a
minimum of two weeks prior to the games. This notice has been required by the Commission so that
surrounding neighbors are aware that a variance has been permitted by the City to accommodate play
and that any question regarding use should be addressed to the City or league representatives. Once
the draft is approved, the Leagues must distribute to the neighbors who adjoin the park.
Respectfully submitted,
Community Services Manager
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
June 19, 1996
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam AICP, City Manager
Linda D. Daniels, Acting Administrative Services Director
Joan Kruse, Purchasing Agent
APPROVAL TO AWARD PURCHASE OF ELECTRONIC RECORDS
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council approve the award to purchase an electronic records management system from
the R. T. Lawrence Consultants Corporation in the amount of $50,250 from Account No. 01-4126-
7047.
BACKGROUND
A request for proposal was issued for the purchase of an electronic records management system with
the ability to retrieve a variety of data and graphic records using CD-ROM technology. The object
of this request for proposal was to improve the accessibility of records, reduce expenses and
improve productivity. Responses to this request for proposal were received from five vendors, all
of whom were Laser Fiche authorized. After extensive evaluation, it was determined that the
company best meeting the City' s need is the R. T. Lawrence Consultants Corporation.
Criteria for evaluation was based on cost, responsiveness, technical experience, ease of
implementation, financial responsibility and references. During the evaluation process consideration
was given regarding application, definition, functionality requirements, document conditions, and
use of current equipment. The R. T. Lawrence Corporation was able to suggest alternatives to the
specification that were innovative and also reduced cost.
,Respectfully s~)mit ,~
Linda D. Daniels
Acting Administrative Services Director
LDD/j
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FR6M:
BY:
SUBJECT:
June 16, 1996
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Gary Varney, Street/Storm Drain Maintenance Supervisor
AUTHORIZATION TO PURCHASE ONE (1) NEW LAYTON F-525 PAVER TOWBOX
AND TRAILER FROM GREAT WEST EQUIPMENT, INC. OF SAN JOSE,
CALIFORNIA, TO BE FUNDED FROM GAS TAX FUNDING, 09-4637-7044, FOR THE
AMOUNT OF $31,819.65 AND TO APPROPRIATE THESE FUNDS FOR FISCAL YEAR
1996/97 IF EQUIPMENT IS NOT DELIVERED ON OR BEFORE JUNE 30, 1996
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the purchase of one (I) Layton F-525 Paver Tow Box &
Trailer from Great West Equipment, Inc. of San Jose, California, to be funded from Gas Tax Funding, 09-
4637~7044 for $31,819.65 and to appropriate these funds for fiscal year 1996/97 if equipment is not delivered
on or before June 30, 1996.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Staff has spent the past three years reviewing many different pavers, and the Layton F-525 best meets the
needs of our street maintenance program. The Layton Paver Tow Box is of the type used for the
maintenance of asphalt roadways by resurfacing streets with a new leveling course of asphalt. The Paver Box
is motor operated not motor driven. This type of motor operation is unique to "Tow Pavers' and allows the
paving operation to be more cost effective because the crew can pave more area in a shorter period of time.
The uniqueness of this type of paver box nanowed the field to two possible suppliers in the State of
California. Staff solicited prices from Superior Equipment Company of Escondido, California, and from
Great West Equipment, Inc. of San Jose, California. Great West Equipment, Inc. of San Jose, California,
is the lowest responsible bidder with options and has met all requirements and is compliant by meeting or
exceeding the City's specifications on performance safety and service requirements.
Respectfully submitted,
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:GV
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
June 19, 1996
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Betty A. Miller, Associate Engineer
APPROVAL OF MAP AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 AND STREET
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 FOR PARCEL
MAP 14806, LOCATED ON THE .NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL
BOULEVARD BETWEEN SPRUCE AND ELM AVENUES, SUBMITTED
BY WESTERN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Parcel Map
14806, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 and Street Lighting
Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 4, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to cause
said map to record.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Tentative Parcel Map 14806, located on the noah side of Foothill Boulevard bet~veen Spruce
and Elm Avenues in the Community Commercial Development District of the Terra Vista
Planned Community, ~vas approved by the Planning Commission on August 23, 1995, for
the division of 25 acres into 8 parcels.
All public improvements adjacent to the site are already in place.
The Developer, Western Development Company has submitted a cash bond for the setting
of the monuments in the following amount:
Monumentation Cash Bond:
$2,800
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
PARCEL MAP 14806 - WESTERN DEV. CO.
June 19, 1996
Page 2
Letters of approval have been received from Cucamonga County Water District and the C.C.
& R. 's have been approved by the City Attorney. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation
forrh signed by the Developer is on file in the City Clerk's office.
Respectfully submitted~
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
Attachments
WJO:BAM:dlw
RESOLUTION NO. ~))(__~, - 62)q 7
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
PARCEL MAP NUMBER 14806
WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map No. 14806, submitted by Westem Development Company
and bonsisting of 8 parcels located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard between Spruce and Elm
Avenues, being a division of 25 acres, was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, on August 23, 1995, and is in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act
and Local Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that Act; and
WHEREAS, Parcel Map No. 14806 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown
on said Tentative Parcel Map; and
WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by
the City Council of said City have now been met.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
HEREBY RESOLVES, as follows:
That the Final Map be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute
the certificate thereon on behalf of said City; and
That said Parcel Map No. 14806 be and the same is hereby approved and
the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to
be filed for record.
RESOLUTION NO. ~(6> ~ I~ q ~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE
ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 AND STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 FOR PARCEL MAP
14806 -
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia, has previously
formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act
of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of Califomia, said
special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 4, Street
Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 (hereinafier
referred to as the "Maintenance District"); and
WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act
of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and
WHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the
property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this referenced to the
Maintenance District; and
WHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the
Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation
without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's "Report".
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the property as
shown in Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto to the
Maintenance District.
SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including the levy of
all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder.
EXHIBIT 'A'
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I
AND 4
®
Q
®
PARCEL 8
PARCEL 6
FOoT'H}/--L.- .5. L.-Vb,
o,
PARCEL 4 PAIqCEL 2 7 ~ '
+,zxze-~ 4,,-~ + -4: L_
_
-e-- Exi-";77N~ 5TRF_6'T /-.IGHT' Z,E~ F-.-ft.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
p/v/
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
EXHIBIT "B"
WORK PROGRAM
PROJECT: PARCEL MAP 14806
STREI~T l ,IGHTS:
Dist. 5800L
S1 ---
S4 ---
NUMBER OF LAMPS
9500L 16.000L 22.000L
--- 10' ---
7' 11' ---
27.500L
LANDSCAPING:
Dist.
L4
Community
Equestrian
Trail
D.G.S.F.
Turf Non-Tuff Trees
S .F. S .F. Ea.
...... 80*
* Existing items installed with original project.
ASSESSMENT UNITS:
Assessment Units
By District
DU or
Parcel Acres S 1 S4 L4
1 5.19 10.38 10.38 10.38
2 0.59 1,18 1.18 1.18
3 5.17 10.34 1034 10.34
4 0.93 1.86 1.86 1.86
5 2.82 5.64 5.64 5.64
6 0.82 1.64 1.64 1.64
7 7.23 14,46 14.46 14.46
8 2.25 4.50 4.50 4.50
Annexation Date: June 19, 1996
Form Date 11/16/94
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
June 19,1996
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager,
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Phil Verbera, Assistant Engineer
APPROVAL OF MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY, VINTNERS WALK ENCROACHMENT/MAINTENANCE
AGREEMENT AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR PARCEL MAP 13845,
LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD
AND ROCHESTER AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY MASI COMMERCE CENTER
PARTNERS
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Parcel Map 13845,
accepting the subject agreement and security, also the Vintners Walk Encroachment/Maintenance
Agreement, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting
Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said
agreement and to cause said map to record.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Parcel Map 13845, located at the southwest comer of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue, in
the Industrial Park District (Subarea 7) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, was approved by the
Planning Commission on September 2, 1992, for the division of 29.5 acres into 27 lots.
The Developer, Masi Commerce Center Partners, is submitting an agreement and security to
guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts:
Faithful Performance Bond
$1,110,000.00
Labor and Material Bond:
$ 555,000.00
Monumentation Cash Deposit $ 3,750.00
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
PARCEL MAP 13845
June 19, 1996
Page 2
Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office.
Letters of approval have been received from Cucamonga County Water District. C.C. & R.'s and
the ~rintners Walk Encroachment/Maintenance Agreement have also been approved by the City
Attomey. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation form signed by the Developer is on file in the
City Clerk's office.
Respectively submitted,
City Engineer
WJO:PV:sd
Attachments
C3
_J
D
g3
_~Ai~JG
/
/
'L
UJ I- X
cJ
'T
~ Z
l
II: ?'
0 L.U
RESOLUTION NO. q(t~ ~ 08QD
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN
ENCROACHMENT/MAINTENANCE FOR VINTNERS WALK OF
PARCEL MAP NO. 13845
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia, has for its
consideration an Encroachment/Maintenance Agreement executed on , by Masi
Commerce Center Partners as developer, for the improvements of Vintners Walk in the public right-
of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the south
side of Foothill Boulevard between Rochester Avenue and 659 feet easterly of said avenue; and
WHEREAS, the Developer is required to construct and install in the aforementioned Vintners
Walk area, plaques, overhead arcade and other related features; and
WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said
Encroachment/Maintenance Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction
with the development of said real property as referred to as Parcel Map No. 13845; and
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Encroachment/Maintenance Agreement submitted by said
developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said
Encroachment/Maintenance Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City
Clerk to attest.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL
MAP NUMBER 13845, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY
WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map No. 13845, submitted by Masi Commerce Center
Partners, and consisting of 27 parcels, located at the southwest comer of Foothill Boulevard and
Rochester Avenue, being a division of 29.5 acres in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 7) of the
Industrial Area Specific Plan, was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, on September 2, 1992, and is in compliance with the Subdivision Map Act and Local
Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that Act; and
WHEREAS, Parcel Map No. 13845 is the final map of the division of land approved as
shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and
WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map
by the City Council of said City have now been met by entry into an Improvement Agreement
guaranteed by acceptable Improvement Security by Masi Commerce Center Partners as developer;
and
WHEREAS, said developer submits for approval said Parcel Map offering for dedication,
for street, highway and related highway purposes, the streets delineated thereon.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security submitted
by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign
said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to
attest; and that the offers for dedication and the final map delineating the same for said Parcel Map
No. 13845 is hereby approved, and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County
Recorder to be filed for record.
RESOLUTION NO. 5~" O~)'
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE
ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR PARCEL MAP
13845
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia, has previously
formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act
of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of Califomia, said
special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B, Street
Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (hereinafter
referred to as the "Maintenance District"); and
WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act
of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and
WHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the
property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this referenced to the
Maintenance District; and
WHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the
Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation
without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's "Report".
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all tree and correct.
SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the property as
sho~vn in Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto to the
Maintenance District.
SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including the levy of
all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder.
EXHIBIT 'A"
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6_,
I F00THZLL
i
26
W I
24 23
25
BOULEVARD
4 5
i2
i3
15
SEBASTIAN WAY
22 2L 20 19 !8
7
!4
,i
'1
'A~EEA' oF, PAEKWA""'( TE'EES/__L/GH"TS
..... ~_C1TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
~-.~,~-'~:~COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
~,',~.~...._]STATE OF CALIFORNIA
7o
STREET LIGHTS:
EXHIBIT "B"
WORK PROGRAM
PROJECT: PARCEL MAP 13845
NUMBER OF LAMPS
Di~. 5800L 9500L 16.000L 22.000L
S1 11' 4
S6 15
27.500L
* 5 - Lamps installed with other previous project. This parcel map will add 6 - 16,000L lamps only
LANDSCAPING:
Community
Equestrian
Trail
Dist. D.G.S.F.
L3B
Turf Non-Turf Trees
S.F. S.F. Ea.
--- 800 184
* Existing items installed with original project.
ASSESSMENT UNITS:
Assessment Units
By District
Parcel Acres S 1 S6 L3 B
27 23.7 47.4 23.7 23.7
Annexation Date: (June 19, 1996)
Form Date 11/16/94
7!
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
'TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
June 19, 1996
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager _
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Jerry A. Dyer, Associate Engineer
APPROVAL OF THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 95-39, LOCATED ON THE
SOUTH SIDE OF ARROW ROUTE (12167 ARROW ROUTE) EAST OF THE 1-15
FREEWAY, SUBMITTED BY AMERICAN PACIFIC CONCRETE PIPE COMPANY
(AMPAC)
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Cormell adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject agreement and
security, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
Conditional Use Permit No. 95-39 was approved by the City Planner on January 23, 1996, for the request
to operate a pre-cast concrete pipe manufacturing business as an interim use on a 39.3 acre site consisting
of four buildings totaling 37,347 square feet in the Heavy Industrial Development District (Subarea 15)
of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located on the south side of Arrow Route (12167 Arrow Route) east
of the 1-15 freeway, APN 229-121-15.
The Developer, American Pacific Concrete Pipe Company (A1VIPAC) is submitting an agreement and
security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts:
Faithful Performance Bond: $123,245.00
Labor and Materialmen Bond: $61,622.50
The property has already annexed into the Landscape and Lighting Districts.
Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's office.
Respectfully submitted,
w i 11 i
City Engineer
WJO:JAD:dlw
Attachments
_j
VICINITY MAP
III
ARROW ROUTE
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIII
I
I
CUP 95-39
PROJECT SITE
AT & SF
Illl!lllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
CUP 95-39
RESOLUTION NO. q(.t9 "' ~)¢7q
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CJdCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT NO. 95-39
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has for its consideration an
Improvement Agreement submitted by American Pacific Concrete Pipe Company (AMPAC), for
the improvements within the City ofRancho Cucamonga public fight-of-way, generally located on
the south side of Arrow Route (12167 Arrow Rome) east of the 1-15 freeway, APN 229-121-15; and
WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement
Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of
said real property as referred to Planning Commission, Conditional Use Permit No. 95-39; and
WHEREAS, the Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient
Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, HEREBY RESOLVES that said Improvement Agreement and
Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said
Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest
thereto.
74
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM':
BY:
SUBJECT:
June 19, 1996
Mayor and Members of the City _Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager, . ~.~.
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Betty A. Miller, Associate Engineer
APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY
FOR 5701 SAPPHIRE STREET, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF SAPPHIRE
STREET SOUTH OF BRITTANY LANE, SUBMITTED BY SH & CH DEVELOPMENT
CO.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject agreement and
security and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk. to sign said agreement.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
At the direction of the Trails Advisory Committee, on July 19, 1995, the developer of a single family
residential property at 5701 Sapphire Street, located on the east side of Sapphire Street south of Brittany
Lane in the Very Low Residential Development District, has agreed to construct a Community Trail along
his south property line. This is in addition to normal frontage improvements.
The Developer, SH & CH Development Co., is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the
construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts:
Faithful Performance Improvement Security:
Labor and Material Improvement Security:
$24,625.00
$13,313.00
Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office.
Respectively! subTi~~~__A_~;
Willia~
City Engineer
WJO:BAM:dlw
k_Attachment
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
rrEM: ~lr_lN tT'Y
fv~p
N
ENGINEERING DIVYSION
RESOLUTION NO. q(--O-/De)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY
FOR 5701 SAPPHIRE STREET-
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its
consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on May 7, 1996, by SH & CH Development Co.
as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically
described therein, and generally located on the east side of Sapphire Street south of Brittany Lane;
and
WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement
Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of
said real property, referred to as 5701 Sapphire Street; and
WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and
sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows:
That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved
and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City
and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and
That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and
sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by
the City Attorney.
77
F'
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA .
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
June 19, 1996
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
Brad Buller, City Planner
Dan Coleman, Principal Planner
APPROVAL OF DENSITY BONUS AGREEMENT BETWEEN NORTHTOWN
HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AND CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FOR 14 UNIT AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT ON 1.38 ACRES OF LAND,
LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF MAIN STREET, BETWEEN ARCHIBALD
AVENUE AND REID AVENUE, AND AUTHORIZING MAYOR TO SIGN SAME.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission and staff recommend approval of the density bonus agreement.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
On June 21, 1995, the City Council approved the Northtown Housing Development Corporation's
request for a General Plan land use amendment and zone change on the property from Industrial Park
to Low Medium Residential. The Northtown Housing Development Corporation's proposal to build the
14-unit "Las Casitas" apartment project is consistent with their neighborhood residential housing infill
program and the Redevelopment Agency's affordable housing strategy.
In conjunction with the Development Application, the applicant has submitted a Density Bonus
Agreement for the construction of three dwelling units above that permitted within the current Low-
Medium Residential zone. Under existing State law, the City may grant a density bonus request of
at least 25 percent over that allowed by the Development Code and/or General Plan. The benefit for
the City is that the density bonus provisions require affordable housing to be provided. In this case,
"lower" income units must be made available to persons with an income equal to 30 percent of 60
percent of the median income level. The Density Bonus Agreement is typically attached to the
agreement between the applicant and the Redevelopment Agency as part of the funding approval for
the project.
Respec submitted,
~ne~
Attachments:
Planning Commission Resolution No. 96-31
Density Bonus Agreement
RESOLUTION NO. 96-31
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
DENSITY BONUS AGREEMENT NO. 96-01, A REQUEST TO EXCEED THE
MAXIMUM DENSITY IN EXCHANGE FOR PROVIDING AFFORDABLE
HOUSING UNITS WITHIN A 14-UNIT APARTMENT PROJECT ON 1.38
ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATION (4-8
DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF MAIN
STREET, BETWEEN ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND REID AVENUE, AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 209-262-02.
A. Recitals.
1. Northtown Housing Development Corporation, has filed an application for Density Bonus
Agreement No. 96-01, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the
subject Density Bonus Agreement is referred to as "the application."
2. On the 22nd day of May 1996, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing
on that date.
3. The subject property of the Density Bonus Agreement is legally described herein.
4. A true and correct copy of the proposed Density Bonus Agreement is attached as
Exhibit "1" to this Resolution.
5. The Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the associated Environmental
Assessment prepared for said project.
6. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. This Commission hereby specifically finds that the Density Bonus Agreement and each
and eve~ term and provision contained therein conforms to the General Plan of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
3. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration,
together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the
application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will
have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends adoption of a Negative Declaration
based upon the findings as follows:
a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California
Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated
thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the
independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and
considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 96-31
DA 96-01- NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP.
May 22, 1996
Page 2
b. That, based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into
the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur.
c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of
Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the
Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project
will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife
depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff
reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public
hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in
Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.
4. This Commission hereby recommends approval of the Density Bonus Agreement
attached hereto as Exhibit "1 ."
5. The Secretary to this Commission shall cedify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF MAY 1996.
C~MIS~F THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
~d~ ~ ~
BY: . i Bark , an
ATT/~Brad/~II, e~ ~
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. do hereby
certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 22rid day of May 1996, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES:
COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, LUHPP, r,ICH:[EL, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: HELCHER
Recording requested by
City of Rancho Cucamonga
and when recorded mail to:
City Clerk
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729
DENSITY BONUS AGREEMENT
This Density Bonus Agreement is made and entered into by and between the CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ("City" hereinafter) and NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION ("Developer" hereinafter).
WITNESSETH
A. Recitals.
(i) California Government Code Section 65915 provides that when a developer
agrees to construct a housing development including lower income units, the City may grant a
density bonus of at least 25 percent over that allowed by the Development Code and/or General
Plan.
(ii) The Developer is owner of certain real property within the City of Rancho
Cucamonga and proposes to construct a residential project which includes lower income units.
Said project contemplated by Developer will require an increase in the maximum allowed density
as provided in the Development Code.
(iii) It is the desire of the City to encourage development designed to provide
affordable dwelling units for residents of the City. In furtherance of that desire, the City is hereby
willing to grant a density bonus to Developer as provided by the terms of this Agreement.
B. Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City and the Developer do hereby agree as follows:
Section 1. Definitions and Interpretations.
Unless otherwise expressly provided herein or unless the context thereof requires
otherwise, the following terms shall have the respective meanings set forth below for all purposes
of this Density Bonus Agreement:
(a) "Affordable units" shall mean those units available for Qualified Tenants and
equal to the number of additional units granted by Section 4 of this Density Bonus Agreement.
(b) "Affordable rent" shall mean that amount as defined in California Health and
Safety Code Section 50053, as said sections are written at the time of executing this Agreement.
As of the date of executing this Agreement, said Section 50053 provides as set forth in Exhibit "B"
attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though fully set forth herein.
(c) "City" shall mean the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
/ 7'
(d) "Development" shall mean the residential rental project which is to be located
and constructed on that certain parcel of rea! property described in Exhibit "A," attached hereto and
incorporated by this reference.
(e) "Qualified Project Period" means the first day on which the residential units
in the Development are first available for occupancy and continuing for 30 years.
(f) "Qualified Tenants" shall mean persons or families of lower income as
defined in California Health and Safety Code Section 50079.5, as said sections are written as of
the time of executing this Agreement. As of the date of executing this Agreement, said Section
50079.5 provides as set forth in Exhibit "C" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this
reference as though fully set forth herein.
Section 2. Construction Condition.
As a specific condition of Site Plan approval and prior to the issuance of building
permits on the Development, the Developer agrees that this Agreement shall be executed by the
City and Developer and shall be recorded pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
Section 3. Operation of Development
The Developer hereby agrees as follows:
(a) For a period of 30 years following the commencement of the Qualified Project
Period, the affordable units in the Development shall be occupied or held vacant and available for
occupancy by Qualified Tenants at affordable rents.
(b) If at any time during the Qualified Project Period the Developer may be
unable to rent or lease the affordable units to Qualified Tenants, the Developer agrees to hold
unrented and vacant said affordable units and to offer such unrented affordable unit only for
occupancy to Qualified Tenants as described in this Agreement.
(c) If at any time during the Qualified Project Period a Qualified Tenant
occupying an affordable unit should cease to be a Qualified Tenant, the Developer may treat such
tenant independent of this Agreement. If such a Qualified Tenant should cease to qualify pursuant
to the terms of this Agreement, the Developer shall hold any then vacant unit available for Qualified
Tenants at an affordable rent for up to six months. If, however, at the time such Qualified Tenant
ceases to be qualified pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. there are no vacant units in the
Development, the Developer shall hold vacant the next available unit for occupancy by Qualified
Tenants at an affordable rent.
(d) That Developer shall covenant as part of each rental or lease agreement with
each new Qualified Tenant, that such Qualified Tenant shall not sublet said affordable unit without
the express approval of Developer or Developer's representative and that Developer shall not allow
any individual Qualified Tenant to so sublet in violation of the terms of this Agreement.
(e) To prepare and submit to the City within 90 days following the beginning of
the Qualified Project Period, and annually upon such date, a Certificate of Continuing Program
Compliance executed by the Developer or its representatives, describing the name, address, and
the Qualified Tenant status for each Qualified Tenant within the development so to insure
compliance with the provisions of this Agreement.
(0 That affordable units within the Development will be offered for rent or lease
to Qualified Tenants and will be rented or leased to such Qualified Tenants without regard
to race, color, religion, gender. marital status or national origin.
Section 4. Density Bonus.
Pursuant to the terms and conditions of this A~greement, together with all terms and
conditions of Resolution No. 96- and 96- , the City hereby grants to the Developer a three-unit
increase in the otherwise maximum allowable residential density under the Rancho Cucamonga
Development Code.
Section 5. Sale or Transfer of Development.
The Developer hereby agrees that in the event of any sale, transfer or other
disposition of the Development, or any interest therein, the Developer and the
Purchaser/Transferee shall serve upon the City notice in writing that the Developer has fully
explained the provisions of this Agreement to the PurchaserFFransferee and that the
PurchaserFFransferee agrees to fulfill the Developer's duties and obligations under this Agreement.
Section 6. Involuntary Loss or Substantial Destruction.
Upon evidence satisfactory to the City that compliance with the provisions of this
Agreement is no longer possible due to substantial destruction of the Development, the Developer
shall not be subject to the terms of the provisions of this Agreement. In the event of any involuntary
transfer or any seizure of Developer's interest in the Development, the terms and provisions of this
Agreement shall be binding upon such transferee.
Section 7. Term.
This Agreement shall become effective upon its execution by the parties hereto and
its recordation as provided herein. Except as provided in the immediately proceeding section. this
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect for the Qualified Project Period.
Section 8. Covenants to Run with the Land.
The Developer hereby subjects the Development and the land described in
Exhibit "A" hereto to the covenants, reservations, and restrictions as set forth herein shall be
deemed covenants running with the land and shall pass to and be binding upon the Developer's
successors and assigns in title or interest to the Development. Each and every contract, deed, or
other instrument hereinafter executed, covering, or conveying the Development or any portion
thereof shall conclusively be held to have been executed. delivered, and accepted subject to the
covenants, reservations, and restrictions expressed in this Agreement, regardless of whether such
covenants, reservations. and restrictions are set forth in such contract, deed, or other instrument.
Section 9. Burden and Benefit.
City and Developer hereby declare their understanding and intent that the burden
of the covenants, reservations, and restrictions set forth herein touch and concern the land in that
the Developer's legal interest in the Development is rendered less valuable thereby. The City and
Developer hereby further declare their understanding and intent that the benefit of such covenants
touch and concern the land by enhancing and increasing the enjoyment and use of the
Development by Qualified Tenants, the intended beneficiaries of such covenants. reservations, and
re<~trictions, and by furthering the public purposes for which this Agreement is adopted. Further,
the parties hereto agree that such covenants, reservations, and restrictions benefit all other real
property located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
Section 10. Scope.
The covenants, reservations, and restrictions described herein shall apply uniformly
to the entire Development in order to establish and carry out a common plan for the use,
development, and improvement of the land on which the Development is to be constructed.
Section 11. Default and Enforcement.
If the Developer defaults in the performance or observance of any covenant,
reservation, or restriction as set forth in this Agreement, and if such default remains uncured for
a period of 30 days after notice to the Developer, or should the Developer not diligently and
continuously prosecute such cure to the appropriate completion, the City may declare that the
Developer is in default under the terms of this Agreement and may take any one or more of the
following steps at its option:
(a) To bring any action or proceeding at law or in equity to require the Developer
to perform its obligations under the terms of this Agreement or to enjoin the Developer from any
acts which may be in violation of this Agreement.
(b) To have access to inspect, examine, and make copies of all books and/or
records of the Developer pertaining to the Development.
(c) To take whatever actions at law or in equity in the name of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga as may appear necessary or desirable to enforce the obligations, covenants,
and agreements of the Developer pursuant to the terms of this Agreement.
In the event the City brings an action or proceeding at law or in equity to require the
Developer to perform its obligations under the terms of this Agreement, the City shall recover from
the Developer any and all costs and attorneys fees incurred therein.
No delay in enforcing the provisions hereof as to any breach or violation shall impair,
damage, or waive the right of the City to enforce the same or to obtain relief for the continuation
or repetition of such breach or violation of any similar breach or violation thereof at any later time
or times.
Section 12. Indemnification of City.
The Developer hereby agrees that it shall indemnify or hold harmless the City and
its officers or employees from and against:
(a) Any and all claims by or on behalf of any person arising from any cause
whatsoever in connection with the Development;
(b) Any and all claims arising from any act or omission of the Developer or any
of its agents, contractors, servants, or employees in connection with the development; and
(c) All costs, attorneys' fees, expenses, or liabilities incurred in connection with
any such claim or proceeding brought thereon, except for claims which arise out of the negligence
or wilful misconduct of the City, its elected officials, officers, agents, and employees.
In the event that any action or proceeding is brought against the City or any of its
officers or employees with respect to which indemnity may be sought hereunder, Developer, upon
written notice from the City, shall assume the investigation and defense thereof, including the
employment of counsel and the payment of all expense. The Developer and the City shall have
the right to employ separate counsel in any such action or proceeding and to participate in the
investigation and defense thereof, and Developer shall pay the fees and expenses of any such
separate counsel retained by the City.
Section 13. Recording and Filing.
As a specific condition, prior to the issuance of building permit on the Development,
the Developer shall cause this Agreement and any amendments or supplements thereto to be
recorded and filed in conjunction with the Development in the office of the County Recorder, County
of San Bernardino, and in any other such places as the City may reasonably request.. Developer
shall pay all fees and charges incurred in connection with such recording and filing. Additionally,
the Developer shall provide the City with a conformed copy of the recorded Agreement, prior to the
issuance of building permits on the Development.
Section 14. Governing Law.
This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California.
Section 15. Amendments.
This Agreement may be amended only by a written instrument executed by the
parties hereto.
Section 16. Notice.
Any notice required to be given by the terms of this Agreement shall be provided by
registered mail at the addresses specified below or at any such other address as may be specified
in writing by the parties hereto:
City:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Attention: City Clerk
Developer:
Northtown Housing Development Corporation
9999 Feron Boulevard, Suite A
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Attention: President
Section 17. Severability.
If any provision, clause, section, subsection, paragraph, or sentence of this
Agreement shall be declared invalid or illegal by a court of competent jurisdiction, the validity and
enforceability of the remaining portions of this Agreement shall not in any way be affected or
impaired.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Manager
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and the Developer have executed this Agreement
as of the dates set opposite their signatures.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Dated: By
William J. Alexander, Mayor
City of Rancho Cucamonga
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO)
On this __day of , 1996, before me, the undersigned, a
Notary Public in and for said State. personally appeared , known
to me to be the Mayor of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation, and said person
is known to me to be the person who executed the within instrument on behalf of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga and acknowledged to me that the City of Rancho Cucamonga executed the
same.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Notary Public in and for said State
NORTHTOWN HOUSING
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
Dated:
By
President
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO)
On before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public
in and for said State, personally appeared
known to me to be the person ~ whose name subscribed to the within
instrument and acknowledged that executed the same.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Notary Public in and for said State
7
Exhibit "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Lots 1 through 12, inclusive, and the easterly 12 and ¼ feet of Lot 13, Block 9, Town of West
Cucamonga, as per Map recorded in Book 13, Page 1, in the Office of the Recorder of San
Bernardino County, California. Together with that portion of Reid Avenue that would attach the
operation of law as vacated by the City of Rancho Cucamonga by Resolution No. 91-312 recorded
November 5, 1991, as Instrument No. 422515, of Official Records.
Exhibit "B"
Section 50053. Affordable Rent.
(a) For any rental housing development which receives assistance prior to January 1,
1991, and a condition of that assistance is compliance with this section, "affordable rents" with
respect to lower income households shall not exceed the percentage of the gross income of the
occupant person or household established by regulation of the department which shall not be less
than 15 percent of gross income nor exceed 25 percent of gross income.
(b) For any rental housing development which receives assistance on or after January
1, 1991, and a condition of that assistance is compliance with this section, "affordable rents,"
including a reasonable utility allowance, shall not exceed:
(1) For very low income households, the product of 30 percent times 50 percent
of the area median income adjusted for family size appropriate for the unit.
(2) For lower income households whose gross incomes exceed the maximum
income for very low income households, the product of 30 percent times 60 percent of the median
income adjusted for family size appropriate for the unit. In addition, for those lower income
households with gross income that exceed 60 percent of the area median income adjusted for
family size, it shall be optional for any state or local funding agency to require that affordable rent
be established at a level not to exceed 30 percent of gross income of the household.
(3) For moderate income households, the product of 30 percent times 110
percent of the area median income adjusted for family size for the unit. In addition, for those
moderate income households whose gross income exceed 110 percent of the area median income
adjusted for family size, it shall be optional for any state or local funding agency to require that
affordable rent be established at a level not to exceed 30 percent of gross income of the
household.
(c) The department's regulation shall permit alternative percentages of income for
agency-assisted rental and cooperative housing developments pursuant to regulations adopted
under subdivision (f) of Section 50462. The department shall, by regulation, adopt criteria defining
and providing for determination of gross income, adjustments for family size appropriate to the unit,
and rent for purposes of this section. These regulations may provide alternative criteria, where
necessary, to be consistent with pertinent federal statutes and regulations governing federally
assisted rental and cooperative housing. The agency may, by regulation, adopt alternative criteria,
and pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 50462, alternative percentages of income may be
adopted for agency-assisted housing developments.
For the purposes of this section, "area median income," "adjustments for family size appropriate
to the unit," and "moderate income household" shall have the same meaning as provided in Section
50052.5.
Exhibit "C"
Section 50079.5. Lower Income Households
"Lower Income households" means persons and families whose income does not exceed the
qualifying limits for lower income families as established and amended from time to time pursuant
to Section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937. The limits shall be published by the
department in the California Administrative Code as soon as possible after adoption by the
Secretary of Housing and Urban Development. In the event such federal standards are
discontinued, the department shall, by regulation, establish income limits for lower income
households for all geographic areas of the state at 80 percent of area median income, adjusted for
family size and revised annually. As used in this section, "area median income" means the median
family income of a geographic area of the state.
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
June 19, 1996
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Linda Beek, Jr. Engineer
AWARD AND AUTHORIZATION FOR EXECUTION OF CONTRACT FOR THE FY
1995/96 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROGRAM, VARIOUS LOCATIONS, TO
CALIFORNIA PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE COMPANY, INC., IN THE AMOUNT
OF $230,737.00($209,760.99, PLUS 10% CONTINGENCY) TO BE FUNDED FROM
GAS TAX, PROPOSITION 111, ACCOUNT NO. 10- 4637-9113 AND ACCOUNT NOS.
40-4130-8050, 41-4130-8050 AND 43-4130-8050
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council award and authorize for execution the contract for the FY 1995/96
Pavement Rehabilitation Program, Various Locations, to the lowest responsive bidder, California
Pavement Maintenance Company, Inc., in the amount of $230,737.00 ($209,760.99, plus 10%
contingency) to be funded from Gas Tax, Proposition 111, Account No. 10- 4637-9113 and Account Nos.
40-4130-8050, 41-4130-8050 and 43-4130-8050. It is also recommended that City Council wave the bid
item No., 2 alteration that the apparent low bidder has made as a minor irregularity and non-binding to the
City. The apparent low bidder has withdrawn said bid alteration.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on June 4, 1996, for the subject
project. California Pavement Maintenance Company, Inc., is the apparent lowest bidder, with a bid amount
of $209,760.99 (see attached bid summary). The Engineer's estimate was $276,670.00. Staff has reviewed
all bids received and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements. Staff has
completed the required background investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid
documents.
Respectfully submitted,
William J O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:LB :dlw
Attachment
o
o
6
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROMi
BY:
SUBJECT:
June 19, 1996
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Linda Beck, Jr. Engineer
AWARD AND AUTHORIZATION FOR EXECUTION OF CONTRACT FOR THE
HERMOSA PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM FOURTH STREET TO SIXTH
STREET, NORTH OF SHARON CIRCLE TO EIGHTH STREET AND SOUTH OF
DEVON STREET TO FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, TO MANHOLE ADJUSTING
CONTRACTORS, INC., IN THE AMOUNT OF $230,145.00($209,223.40, PLUS 10%
CONTINGENCY) TO BE FUNDED FROM MEASURE I, ACCOUNT NO. 32-4637-
9520 AND SB 140, ACCOUNT NO. 35-4637-9520.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council award authorize for execution the contract for the Hermosa
Pavement Rehabilitation from Fourth Street to Sixth Street, North of Sharon Circle to Eighth Street and
South of Devon Street to Foothill Boulevard, to the lowest responsive bidder, Manhole Adjusting
Contractors, Inc., in the amount of $230,145.00 ($209,223.40, plus 10% contingency)to be funded from
Measure I, Account No. 32-4637-9520 and SB 140, Account No. 354637-9520
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on June 4, 1996, for the subject
project. Manhole Adjusting Contractors, Inc., is the apparent lowest bidder, with a bid amount of
$209,223.40 (see attached bid summary). The Engineer's estimate was $226,790.00. Staff has reviewed
all bids received and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements. Staff has
completed the required background investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid
documents.
Respectfu ubmitted,
William J
City Engineer
WJO:LB:dlw
Attachment
Z
Z --
0~
KOKO
O~Z9
W~
W
DATE:
TO:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
June 19, 1996
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack-Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM:
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY:
Dale Catron, City Facilities Supervisor
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL TO AWARD AND AUTHORIZATION FOR EXECUTION OF
CONTRACT FOR THE ROOF REPLACEMENT FOR THE CIVIC CENTER AND
POLICE STATION TO BE FUNDED FROM APPROVED RDA 1995/96 FUNDS,
ACCOUNT NUMBER 17-5100 AND FOR THE ROOF REPLACEMENT OF THE 9TH
STREET CORPORATE YARD TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NUMBER 01-
4647-7043 AND THE PUBLIC LIBRARY, TO BE FUNDED FROM APPROVED RDA
1995/96 FUNDS, ACCOUNT NUMBER 13-5100
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council award and authorize for execution the contract for the Roof
Replacement for the Civic Center and Police Station to be funded from approved RDA 1995/96 funds,
Account Number 17-5100 and for the Roof Replacement of the 9th Street Corporate Yard to be funded
from Account Number 01-4647-7043 and the Public Library, to be funded from approved RDA 1995/96
funds, Account Number 13-5100.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The roofing systems at the various locations have partially failed. An analysis of responses to a request
for services was conducted in 1995, and a certified roof systems consulting firm was selected. It has been
determined by our roofing consultant that total replacement is the most cost effective alternative. By
replacing the entire systems, it is possible to gain long-term warranties for the work through the
manufacturer, as well as the contractor. Thorough specifications were prepared by the consultant,
reviewed by staff, and the projects were advertised for bid March 28, 1996. Bids were opened on June 13
and reviewed by staff and the consultant. The lowest responsive bidder will be submitted to Council prior
to the City Council meeting.
Willi.~0',~ei~l/~
City Engineer
WJO:DC
k,_ Attachment
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
By:
SUBJECT:
June 19,1996
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Michael D. Long, Supervising Public Works Inspector
AWARD AND AUTHORIZATION THE EXECUTION OF A PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION SURVEY OF THE HAVEN
AVENUE STORM DRAIN AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS, FROM DEER CREEK
CHANNEL TO BASE LINE ROAD, WITH ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS IN THE
AMOUNT OF $33,055.00 (ORIGINAL PROPOSAL PLUS 10% CONTINGENCY) TO
BE FUNDED PROPORTIONATELY FROM MEASURE I FUNDS ACCOUNT NOS.
32--4637-9027 AND 32-4637-9537, SB 140 FUNDS ACCOUNT NO. 35--4637-9027 AND
CITY DRAINAGE FUND NO. 23-4637-9537
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council award and authorize for execution of a Professional Services
Agreement for the construction survey of the Haven Avenue Storm Drain and Street Improvements, from
Deer Creek Channel to Base Line Road, with Associated Engineers in the amount of $33,055.00 (original
proposal plus 10% contingency) to be funded proportionately from Measure I Funds Account Nos. 32-
4637-9027 and 32-4637-9537, SB 140 Funds Account No. 35-4637-9027 and City Drainage Fund No. 23-
4637-9537.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
A bid was solicited from Associated Engineers for the construction survey of the Haven Avenue Storm
Drain and Street Improvements, from Deer Creek Channel to Base Line Road. Because of their past
experience in this type of work and their years of expertise in this area, staff felt the Associated Engineers
met all the qualifications for the job.
Respectfully submitted,
City Engineer
WJO:MDL:dlw
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
June 19, 1996
TO:
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM:
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY:
Michael D. Long, Supervising Public Works Inspector
SUBJECT:
AWARD AND AUTHORIZATION FOR EXECUTION OF CONTRACT FOR
THE JERSEY BOULEVARD STORM DRAIN AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS,
FROM HAVEN AVENUE EAST TO THE RAILROAD SPUR, TO BE FUNDED
FROM PROPOSITION 111 FUNDS ACCOUNT NO. 10-4637-9505, SB140
FUNDS ACCOUNT NO. 354637-9505, MEASURE I FUND ACCOUNT NO. 32-
4637-9505 AND AD 82-1R ACCOUNT NO. 83-4637-6028
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council award and authorize for execution the contract for the Jersey
Boulevard Storm Drain and Street Improvements, from Haven Avenue east to the railroad spur, to
be funded from Proposition 111 Funds Account No. 10-4637-9505, SB140 funds Account No. 35-
4637-9505, Measure I fund Account No. 324637-9505 and AD 82-1R Account No. 834637-6028.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
Per previous Council action, bids were solicited and a bid date of June 18, 1996, was set. To avoid
any delay in this project a bid summary and announcement of the lowest responsive bidder will be
submitted to council prior to the Council meeting. The Engineer's estimate was $750,000.00.
Respectfully submitted,
Willi~O,Neii~~/f
City Engineer
WJO:ML:dlw
Attachment
_j
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
June 19, 1996
Mayor and Members of the Cily Council
Jack Larn, AICP, City Manager
William J. O~leil, City Engineer
Michael D. Long, Supervising Public Works Inspector
ACCEPT THE TOUCH PAD SYSTEM CONSTRUCTED IN EAST AND WEST
BERYL PARKS, CONTRACT NO. 95-014, AS COMPLETE, RELEASE THE
CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT DEPOSITED IN LIEU OF RETENTION AND
AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION
AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $39,150.00
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that City Council accept the Touch Pad System Constructed in East and West
Beryl Parks, Contract no. 95-014, as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a "Notice of
Completion, and release of the Certificate of Deposit in the amount of $39,150.00 after the
recordation of said notice.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications
and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The final contract amount, based on project
documentation, is $39,150.00, which includes no contract change orders.
Respectfully submitted,
William J O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:MDL:dlw
Attachment
RESOLUTION NO. q(4~ _ / f) [
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE TOUCH PAD SYSTEM
CONSTRUCTED IN EAST-AND WEST BERYL PARKS,
CONTRACT NO. 95-014 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A
NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for the Touch Pad System
Constructed in East and West Beryl Parks, Contract No. 95-014, have been completed to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work
complete.
NOW, THEREFOR.E, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a
Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bemardino County.
ORDINANCE NO. 654
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 96-01, A
REQUEST TO AMEND THE INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN TEXT
FOR t4.45 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED SOUTH OF FOOTHILL
BOULEVARD, NORTH OF EUCALYPTUS AVENUE, EAST OF
SPRUCE AVENUE, AND WEST OF ELM AVENUE, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 208-352-62
THROUGH 69.
A. Recitals.
1. Wohl/Rancho Partners has filed an application for Industrial Area Specific
Plan Amendment No. 96-01, as described in the title of this Ordinance. Hereinafter
in this Ordinance, the subject Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment is referred
to as "the application."
2. On May 1, 1996, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted
General Plan Amendment 96-01A approving a land use change from Industrial Park
to Community Commercial, and
3. On May 8, 1996, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
4. On June 5, 1996, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.
B. Ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and ordained by the City
Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the
Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-
referenced public hearing on June 5, 1996, including written and oral staff reports,
together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
The application applies to approximately 14.45 acres of land,
basically a rectangle configuration, located south of Foothill
Boulevard, north of Eucalyptus Street, east of Spruce Avenue, and
west of Elm Avenue, and is presently vacant. Said property is
currently designated as Industrial Park; and
Ordinance No. 554
Page 2
The property to the north of the subject site is designated
Community Commercial and is partially developed. The property to
the west is designated Industrial Park and is partially developed.
The property to the east is designated Industrial Park and is vacant.
The property to the south is designated Industrial Park and is vacant.
This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the
General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in
a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related
development; and
d. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land
Use Element; and
This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to
the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on
the environment nor the surrounding properties.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the
above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in
paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows:
That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the
proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with
existing land use in the surrounding area; and
b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts
on the environment nor surrounding properties; and
c. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General
Plan.
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative
Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental
assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial
evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and
adopts a Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows:
That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with
the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and
the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said
Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect
the independent judgment of the City Council; and further, this
Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in
said Negative Declaration with regard to the application.
Ordinance No. 554
Page 3
That based upon the changes and alterations which have been
incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse
environmental effects will occur.
Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the
California Code of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In
considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative
Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed
project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife
resources of the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further,
based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative
Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information
provided to the City Council during the public hearing, the City
Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth
in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of
Regulations.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and
4 above, this Council hereby approves of Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment
No. 96-01 to add text changes as set forth in Exhibit "A" of this Ordinance.
6. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption fo this ordinance and shall cause the
same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in the
Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City
of Ontario, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Ordinance No. 554
Page 4
INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN
PART III - DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES
TABLE 111-2 - LAND USE TYPE DEFINITIONS
D. COMMERCIAL USE TYPES (Page 111-13)
After" Business Support Services" and before "Communication Services" insert:
Community Commercial Retail Business: Within an approved Community Commercial Center
which extends an Activity Center, this category adds uses to the retail uses already permitted
within the Subarea in which the Center is situated. Uses shall be consistent with the
Community Commercial Retail Business uses permitted in the Terra Vista Community Plan
which are incorporated herein by reference. The intent is to encourage a mix of uses which can
make a Center lively well into the night, to function as an active people place, and to serve not
only the residents of the City but, by location, also to draw from residential areas in neighboring
communities.
INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN
PART IV - OVERLAY DISTRICTS AND SUBAREA DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
SUBAREA 7: Special Consideration (Page IV-52)
Change the fourth paragraph to read as follows:
On the east side of Haven Avenue, north of Arrow Highway, Development Code provisions for
the General Commercial District shall apply to the anchor store and adjoining northerly building.
Development and use of satellite buildings in the Center are subject to provisions of the
Industrial Area Plan Specific Plan. (Existing text revised to delete reference to K-Mart).
At the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue, adjoining the Rancho
Cucamonga Adult Sports Park and Rancho Cucamonga Stadium uses allowed in the
Recreational Commercial General Plan Land Use category shall be permitted within the
planned 27 acres Mixed Use Center. (Ord. No. 521, 4/20/94)
Add the following paragraph:
On the south side of Foothill Boulevard, a Community Commercial Retail Center is
Conditionally Permitted subject to a Master Plan on a 14.45 acre parcel bounded by Spruce
Avenue on the west, Elm Avenue on the east, and Eucalyptus Street on the south. This site
is a logical extension of the Haven and Foothill Activity Center which encourages a mix of uses
to function as an active people place and be lively well into the night for the residents of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga. Compatibility with adjacent existing and intended Industrial Park
Development shall be demonstrated through site planning, building design, and landscaping.
All retail business uses permitted in the Terra Vista Community Commercial designation are
permitted within the Center and are incorporated by reference. A Master Sign Program shall
be required and shall be consistent with sign code requirements for Commercial Retail Centers.
(ISPA 96-01 )
EXHIBIT "A"
ORDINANCE NO. 555
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
REPEALING CHAPTER 9.24 OF TITLE 9 AND
ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 9.24 TO TITLE 9 OF
THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE
PERTAINING TO MASSAGE TECHNICIANS, MASSAGE
ESTABLISHMENTS AND SIMILAR BUSINESSES.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as
follows:
Section 1. Chapter 9.24 of Title 9 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal
Code hereby is repealed, in its entirety; provided, however, that said repeal shall not
apply to or excuse any violation thereof occurring prior to the effective date of this
Ordinance.
Section 2. A new Chapter 9.24 hereby is added to Title 9 of the Rancho
Cucamonga Municipal Code to read, in words and figures, as follows:
"Chapter 9.24
"MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENTS AND TECHNICIANS
"ARTICLE I. MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENTS
"Sections:
Application
Nanle
9.24.010 - Definitions
9.24.020 - Permit Required
9.24.030 - Same - Exceptions
9.24.040 - Massage Establishment -
9.24.050
9.24.060
9.24.070
9.24.080
9.24.090
- Same - Operating Requirements
- Same - Facilities
- Same - Inspections
- Same - Permit Not Assignable
- Same - Change of Location or
9.24.1 O0
9.24.110
9.24.120
- Same - Notification of Change
- Same - Renewal of Permit
- Applicability of Regulations to
CLRC\ORDXMAS SAGEX 1.3.1B
Existing Business
"ARTICLE II. MASSAGE TECHNICIANS
"Sections:
Required
9.24.210 -
9.24.220 -
9.24.230 -
Technician
9.24.240 -
Regulations to Persons
Technicians on Effective
9.24.200 - Massage Technicians - Permit
Same - Application
Same - Renewal
Same - Notification by
Same - Applicability of
Working as Massage
Date Hereof
"ARTICLE III. OUT CALL MASSAGE SERVICES
"Sections:
9.24.300 - Out Call Massage Services -
Special Endorsement Required
9.24.310 - Same - Application
9.24.320 - Same - Records
"ARTICLE IV. PROHIBITED CONDUCT, PROCEDURES, AND
PENALTIES
"Sections: 9.24.400 - Prohibited Conduct
9.24.410 - Suspension Pending
Revocation
9.24.420 - Revocation - Message
Establishment Permit
9.24.430 - Same - Massage Technician
Permit
Appeal Procedure
9.24.440 - Permit Denial/Revocation
9.24.450 - Burden of Proof at Hearing
"ARTICLE I. MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENTS
"Section 9.24.010 - Definitions.
CLRC\ORDLMAS SAGE\ 1.3.1 B
2
"Unless the particular provision of the context
otherwise requires, the definitions and provisions contained in
this Section shall govem the construction, meaning, and
application of words and phrases used in this Chapter:
"(a) 'Applicant(s)' shall mean the individual
applicant and/or the designated officer or managing partner
acting on behalf of a corporation or partnership.
"(b) 'Chief shall mean that Officer of the San
Bernardino Sheriffs Department, or his or her designee,
designated to by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to fulfill the
prescribed duties herein.
"(c) 'Director' shall mean the Director of
Administrative Services of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or
his or her designee.
"(d) 'Employee' means any and all persons, other
than a massage technician, who may render any service to the
permittee, and who receives compensation from the permittee
or his or her agent, and who have no physical contact with the
customers or clients.
"(e) 'Hearing Officer' shall mean the City Manager of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or his or her designee.
"(f) 'Massage' means any method of treating the
external parts of the human body for remedial, health, or
hygienic purposes by means of pressure on or friction against;
or stroking, kneading, rubbing, tapping, pounding; or
stimulating the extemal parts of the human body with the
hands or other parts of the human body, with or without the
aid of any mechanical or electrical apparatus or appliances; or
with or without supplementary aids, such as rubbing alcohol,
liniments, antiseptics, oils, powders, creams, lotions,
ointments, or other similar preparations.
"(g) 'Massage Establishment' means any
establishment having a fixed place of business where any
person, firm, association, partnership, corporation engages in,
conducts, or carries on, or permits to be engaged in,
C\RC\ORD\MAS S AGE\ 1.3. I B
3
conducted or carried on, any business of giving massages,
baths, administration of fomentation, electric or magnetic
treatments, alcohol rubs, or any other type of system for
treatment or manipulation of the human body with or without
any character of bath, such as Turkish, Russian, Swedish,
Japanese, vapor, shower, electric tub, sponge, mineral,
fomentation, or any other type of bath.
"(h) 'Massage Technician' shall include a 'Massage
Technician', 'Massage Trainee', 'Masscur', 'Masseuse' and
means any person who administers to another person, for any
form of consideration, 'massage' as defined, or bathes,
manipulates the body, or uses electric massage procedure, or
similar procedure.
"(i) 'Permittee' means any person, firm, partnership
or corporation having a permit issued hereunder, for a
massage establishment, and/or a massage technician, as the
case may be.
"(j) 'Qualified Massage Association' means any
association which has established a minimum education
requirement for membership of at least five hundred (500)
hours of training from a recognized school of massage, offers
and requires participation and completion by members of a
minimum number of hours of specified continuing education
as a condition of membership, is open to members of the
general public meeting the requirements for membership, on a
national basis, and has minimum educational requirements or
equivalents, including at least five hundred (500) classroom
hours or its equivalent in anatomy, physiology, hygiene,
sanitation, massage therapy and practice, ethics of massage
practice, first aid and CPR. Equivalency must be verified by
written and practical testing by the Association. Further, the
Association must have established rules of ethics and
enforcement procedures for suspension or revocation of
membership for violation of such rules. In addition, the
Association must require participation and completion by
members of a minimum number of hours of specified
continuing education for eligibility for certification and
recertification. In this regard, the City reserves the right to
require evidence of such training, recertification and
professional experience as a condition of continued
membership.
CXP, C\O RD\MAS S AGE\ I. 3.1 B
4
"(k) 'Recognized School of Massage' means any
school or institution of learning which teaches the theory,
ethics, practice, profession, or work of massage, which has
been approved pursuant to Sections 94310 or 94311 of the
California Education Code. A school offering a
correspondence course not requiring attendance shall not be
deemed a recognized school for purposes of this Chapter.
The City of Rancho Cucamonga shall have the fight to
confirm that the applicant has actually attended class in a
recognized school.
"(1) 'Out Call Massage Service' means any business
where the primary function of such business is to engage in or
carry on massage, not always at a fixed location, but also at
locations designated by the customers or clients.
"Section 9.24.020 - Permit Required.
"(a) It shall be unlawful for any person, firm,
partnership or corporation to engage in, conduct or carry on,
or to permit to be engaged in, conducted or carried on, in or
upon any premises within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the
operation of a massage establishment as herein described,
without first having obtained a permit issued by the City of
Rancho Cucamonga pursuant to the provisions herein set
forth. Said permit shall immediately be surrendered to the
Director upon suspension, revocation, or expiration of said
permit.
"(b) A permit under this Article I shall be valid for
twelve (12) months from the date of issuance unless revoked
or suspended. The permit required shall be in addition to any
business license required by City ordinance or any other
permit required for such use including, but not limited to, any
conditional use permit or other similar entitlement for use.
"Section 9.24.030 - Same - Exceptions.
"The provisions of this Chapter shall not apply to the
following classes of individuals while engaged in the
performance of the duties of their respective professions:
"(a) Physicians, surgeons, chiropractors, osteopaths,
CLRC\ORDLMASSAGE\I 3.1B
or physical therapists who are duly licensed to practice their
respective professions in the State of California.
"(b) Nurses registered under the laws of the State of
California.
"(c) Barbers and beauticians who are duly licensed
under the laws of the State of California while engaging in
practice within the scope of their licenses, except that this
provision shall apply solely to the massaging of the neck,
face, and/or scalp of the customer or client.
"(d) Hospitals, nursing homes, sanitariums, or other
health care facilities duly licensed by the State of Califomia.
"(e) Accredited high schools, junior colleges, and
colleges or universities whose coaches and trainers are acting
within the scope of their employment.
"(f) Trainers of amateur, semiprofessional or
professional athletes or athletic teams.
"Section 9.24.040 - Massage Establishment-
Application.
"(a) Any person, firm, corporation, or parmership
desiring to obtain a permit to operate a massage establishment
shall make application under penalty of perjury of the laws of
the State of Califomia, to the Director. Prior to submitting
such application, a non-refundable fee in an amount
established by the City Council shall be paid to the City to
defray, in part, the cost of the investigation and reports
required by this Article I. A copy of the receipt showing
payment of the required fee shall accompany the application.
"(b) The applicant, if a corporation or parmership,
shall designate one of its officers or general partners to act as
its responsible managing employee. Such person shall
complete and sign all application forms required of an
individual applicant under this Chapter; however, only one
application fee shall be charged. The corporation's or
partnership's responsible managing employee must, at all
times, meet all of the requirements established for permittees
by this Chapter or the corporation or partnership permit shall
C~RC\ORDMMAS SAGE\ 1.3.1 B
6
be suspended until a responsible managing employee who
meets such requirements is designated. If no such person is
found within ninety (90) days, the corporation or partnership
permit shall be deemed canoeled without further notice and a
new initial application for permit must be filed.
"(c) The application and fee required under this
Section shall be in addition to any license, permit or fee
required under any other provisions of this Code or ordinance
heretofore or hereafter adopted together with a writing, signed
and dated by the applicant, under penalty of perjury, stating
that all information contained in the application is true and
correct:
"(d) The application for permit does not authorize
conducting a massage establishment. No business shall be
conducted until such permit has been granted.
"(e) Each applicant for a massage establishment
permit shall submit the following information:
"1. The full true name under which the
business will be conducted. If the name is a fictitious name,
all individual owners, stockholders, partners, etc., shall be
identified.
"2. The present or proposed address where the
business is to be conducted.
"3. The applicant's full, true name, any other
names used, date of birth, California Driver' s License number
or California identification number, Social Security number,
present residence address and telephone number. The sex,
height, weight, color of hair, and color of eyes.
"4. Previous two (2) residences of the
applicant and the inclusive dates at each address.
"5. The applicant's business, occupation, and
employment history for five (5) years preceding the date of
application, and the inclusive dates of same.
"6. The permit history of the applicant,
including whether such person has ever had any permit or
CXRC\ORDXMAS SAGE\ 1.3.1 B
license issued by any agency, board, City, County, Parish,
Territory, or State, the date of issuance of such a permit or
license, whether the permit or license was revoked or
suspended, or if a vocational or professional license or permit
was issued, revoked, or suspended, and the reason(s) therefor.
"7. All convictions for any crime involving
conduct which requires registration under any state, federal or
territorial law similar to and including California Penal Code
§ 290, or of conduct which is a violation of the provisions of
any state, federal or territorial law similar to and including
California Penal Code §§ 266h, 266i, 314, 315, 316, 318, 647,
any other crime involving the elements of the foregoing code
sections, by way of plea bargain, or any crime involving
dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or moral turpitude. For the purposes
of this Article I, 'conviction' shall include a conviction
pursuant to a plea of guilty or nolo contendere.
"8. A complete explanation of all services to
be provided.
"9. The name, address, and date of birth of
each massage technician, aide, trainee, or employee who is or
will be employed in said establishment.
"10. The name and address of any massage
business or other like establishment owned or operated by any
person whose name is required to be given pursuant to this
Section wherein the business or profession of massage is
carded on.
"11. Acceptable written proof that the
applicant is at least eighteen (18) years of age.
"12. If the applicant is a corporation, the name
of the corporation shall be set forth exactly as shown in its
Articles of Incorporation or Charter together with the State
and date of incorporation and the names and residence
addresses of each of its current officers and directors, and of
each stockholder holding five percent (5%) or more of the
stock of that corporation.
"13. If the applicant is a partnership, the
CLRC\ORDLMASSAGE\1.3. I B
application shall set forth the name and residence addresses of
each of the partners, including limited partners. If the
applicant is a limited partnership, it shall furnish a copy of its
certificate of limited parmership as filed with the County
Clerk. If one or more of the partners is a corporation, the
provisions of subsection 9.24.040(d)12 pertaining to
corporate applicants shall apply.
"14. The Director may require the applicant to
fumish fingerprints when needed for the purpose of
establishing identification. Any required fingerprinting fee
will be the responsibility of the applicant.
"15. Two (2) current, full-face, portrait
photographs of the applicant, two (2) inches by two (2) inches
in size shall be provided by the applicant.
"16. A description of any other business to be
operated on the same premises, or on adjoining premises,
owned or controlled by the applicant shall be set forth.
"17. The name and address of the owner and
lessor of the real property upon or in which the business is to
be conducted shall be identified. In the event the applicant is
not the legal owner of the property, the application must be
accompanied by a copy of the lease and a notarized
acknowledgment from the owner of the property that a
massage establishment will be located on his/her property.
"18. Authorization for the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, its agents and employees to seek information and
conduct an investigation into the truth of the statements set
forth in the application shall be required. The Chief shall
provide such assistance to the Director as may be required to
fully investigate the applicant and the truth of the matters set
forth in the application.
"19. The applicant shall submit any change of
address or fact which may occur during the procedure of
applying for a massage establishment permit.
"20. The applicant, if an individual, or
designated responsible managing employee if a partnership or
corporation, shall personally appear at the Police Department
C\RC\ORDMMAS SAGEX 1.3.1B
application shall set forth the name and residence addresses of
each of the parmers, including limited partners. If the
applicant is a limited partnership, it shall furnish a copy of its
certificate of limited partnership as filed with the County
Clerk. If one or more of the partners is a corporation, the
provisions of subsection 9.24.040(d)12 pertaining to
corporate applicants shall apply.
"14. The Director may require the applicant to
fumish fingerprints when needed for the purpose of
establishing identification. Any required fingerprinting fee
will be the responsibility of the applicant.
"15. Two (2) current, full-face, portrait
photographs of the applicant, two (2) inches by two (2) inches
in size shall be provided by the applicant.
"16. A description of any other business to be
operated on the same premises, or on adjoining premises,
owned or controlled by the applicant shall be set forth.
"17. The name and address of the owner and
lessor of the real property upon or in which the business is to
be conducted shall be identified. In the event the applicant is
not the legal owner of the property, the application must be
accompanied by a copy of the lease and a notarized
acknowledgment from the owner of the property that a
massage establishment will be located on his/her property.
"18. Authorization for the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, its agents and employees to seek information and
conduct an investigation into the troth of the statements set
forth in the application shall be required. The Chief shall
provide such assistance to the Director as may be required to
fully investigate the applicant and the truth of the matters set
forth in the application.
"19. The applicant shall submit any change of
address or fact which may occur during the procedure of
applying for a massage establishment permit.
"20. The applicant, if an individual, or
designated responsible managing employee if a partnership or
corporation, shall personally appear at the Police Department
CLRC\ORD\MAS SAGE\ 1.3.1 B
for fingerpriming and produce proof that the application fee
has been paid and shall present the application containing the
required information as described in this § 9.24.040.
"21. A certificate of compliance from both the
City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Services
Department, Building and Safety Division, and the San
Bernardino County Health Department must be submitted
prior to the application approval. Any required inspection
fees shall be the responsibility of the applicant.
"If the certificates of compliance are not
received by the Director within sixty (60) days of the date of
filing, the application shall be deemed void. If any land use
permit or other entitlement for use is required, such permit or
use shall be applied for and received prior to the massage
establishment permit becoming effective.
"22. The Director shall have up to one
hundred twenty (120) calendar days to investigate the
application and the background of the applicant. Upon the
completion of the investigation, the Director shall grant the
permit if he or she finds:
"(a) The required fee has been paid;
"(b) The application conforms in all
respects to the provisions of this Article I;
"(c) The applicant has not made a
material
misrepresentation in the application;
"(d) The applicant, if an individual, or
any of the stockholders of the corporation, or any officers or
directors, if the applicant is a corporation, or any partner if the
applicant is a partnership, has not been convicted in a court of
competent jurisdiction of an offense specified in
§ 9.24.040(d)7;
"(e) The applicant has not had a
massage establishment, massage technician, or other similar
permit or license denied, revoked, or suspended by the City,
or any other State, territory, county, parish or local agency
prior to the date of approval;
C\RC\ORDMMAS SAI3E\ 1.3.1 B
10
(18) years of age;
"(f) The applicant is at least eighteen
"(g) The massage establishment as
proposed by the applicant would comply with all applicable
laws, including, but not limited to, health, zoning, fire, and
safety requirements and standards.
"23. If the Director, following investigation of
the applicant, determines that the applicant does not fulfill the
requirements as set forth in this Article I, the Director shall
deny said application by dated, written notice to the applicant,
forwarded to the applicant' s address as set forth in the
application, by U.S. mail, with a proof of service attached.
Following a denial or revocation of a massage establishment
permit, no application for a massage establishment permit
may be filed by such applicant, at the same or substantially
similar physical location, for at least one year following the
date of such denial or revocation. The applicant shall have
the right of appeal as to any denial, as set forth in § 9.24.440.
"24. Proof of compliance with all applicable
provisions of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code and the
applicable ordinances shall be provided prior to the issuance
of any permits.
"Section 9.24.050 - Same - Operating
Requirements.
"No person shall engage in, conduct, or carry on, or
permit to be engaged in, conducted, or carried on, any
massage establishment, unless each and all of the following
requirements are met:
"(a) Each person employed or acting as a massage
technician shall have a valid permit issued by the Director,
which permit shall be displayed in a conspicuous area open to
the public at all times. It shall be unlawful for any owner,
manager, operator, responsible managing employee, or
C~RC\ORDMMAS SAGE\ 1.3.1 B
11
permittee in charge of or in control of a massage
establishment to employ or permit a person to act as a
massage technician who is not in possession of a valid,
unrevoked massage technician permit issued pursuant to this
Chapter and which is wom clearly visible during working
hours.
"(b) The possession of a valid Massage Establishment
Permit does not authorize the possessor to perform work for
which a Massage Technician Permit is required.
"(c) Massage and bath operations shall be carried on
or conducted, and the premises shall be open, only between
the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m.
"(d) A list of services available as approved pursuant
to the application and the cost of such services shall be posted
in an open public place within the premises, and shall be
described in readily understandable language. In the event
any list of services and costs posted or provided hereunder is
in other than the English language, the permittee shall, at the
permittee's cost and expense, provide to the Director an
English language translation thereof. Said English translation
shall be attested to being a full, tree and correct translation
thereof under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of
California. No owner, manager, operator, responsible
managing employee, or permittee shall permit, and no
massage technician shall offer or perform, any service other
than those posted.
"(e) The Massage Establishment Permit and a copy of
the permit of each and every massage technician employed in
the establishment shall be displayed in an open and
conspicuous place on the premises.
"(f) Every massage establishment shall keep a written
record of the date and hour of each treatment, the name and
address of each patron, the name of the massage technician
administering the treatment, and the type of treatment
administered. Such written record shall be maintained on
forms approved by the Director. Such records shall be open
to inspection only by officials charged with enforcement of
this Chapter, shall be available during all business hours of
the establishment, and shall be used for no other purpose.
CXRC\ORDXMASSAGE\1.3.1B
12
Any unauthorized disclosure or use of such information by
any officer or employee of the City or the County of San
Bemardino, or the owner or employee of the massage
establishment, shall constitute a misdemeanor and such
persons shall be subject to the penalty of the provisions of this
Chapter in addition to any other penalties provided by law.
Such records shall be maintained on the premises of the
massage establishment for a period of two (2) years.
"(g) Massage establishments shall at all times be
equipped with an adequate supply of clean, sanitary towels,
coverings, and linens. Clean towels, coverings and linens
shall be stored in enclosed cabinets. Towels and linens shall
not be used on more than one (1) patron, unless such towel or
linen has first been laundered and disinfected. Disposable
towels and coverings shall not be used on more than one (1)
patron. Soiled linens and towels shall be deposited in
separate, Health Department approved receptacles.
"(h) If male and female patrons are to be treated
simultaneously at the same massage establishment, separate
massage rooms, separate dressing facilities and separate toilet
facilities shall be provided for male and female patrons.
"(i) Wet and dry heat rooms, steam or vapor rooms or
cabinets, toilet rooms, shower and bath rooms, tanning
booths, whirlpool baths and pools shall be thoroughly cleaned
and disinfected as needed, and at least once each day the
premises are open, with a disinfectant approved by the San
Bemardino County Health Department. Bathtubs shall be
thoroughly cleaned with a disinfectant, approved by the
Health Department, after each use. All walls, ceilings, floors,
and other physical facilities of the establishment must be in
good repair and maintained in a clean and sanitary condition.
"(j) Instruments utilized in performing massage shall
not be used on more than one (1) patron unless such
instruments have been sterilized, using approved sterilizing
methods.
"(k) All employees, including massage technicians,
shall be clean, and wear clean, nontransparent outer garments.
Said garments shall not expose their genitals, pubic area,
buttocks, or chest. Massage technicians shall maintain the
CXRC\ORDMMASSAGE\I 3.1B
13
massage technician permit visibly on their person during
business hours.
"(1) No person shall enter, be or remain in any part of
a massage establishment while in the possession of,
consuming, under the influence of or using any alcoholic
beverage or drugs except pursuant to a prescription for such
drugs. The owner, operator, responsible managing employee,
manager, or permittee shall not permit any such person to
enter or remain upon such premises.
"(m) No massage establishment shall operate as a
school of massage, or use the same facilities as that of a
school of massage.
"(n) No massage establishment granted a permit
under this Article I shall place, publish or distribute or cause
to be placed, published or distributed any advertising matter
that depicts any portion of the human body that would
reasonably suggest to prospective customers or clients that
any service is available other than those services described in
§ 9.24.050(d) of this Article I. Nor shall any massage
establishment or out call massage service employ language in
the text of such advertising that would reasonably suggest to a
prospective patron that any service is available other than
those services as described in § 9.24.050(d) of this Article I.
"(o) No service enumerated in § 9.24.050(d) of this
Article I may be carried on within any cubicle, room, booth or
any area within a massage establishment, which is fitted with
a door capable of being locked.
"(p) All exterior doors shall remain unlocked from the
interior side during business hours.
"(q) A massage shall not be given and no patron shall
be in the presence of a massage technician or other employee
unless the patron's genitals are fully covered by a non-
transparent covering. In addition, a female patron's breasts
shall be fully covered by a non-transparent covering.
"(r) No massage establishment shall be open for
business without at least one massage technician on the
premises at all times who is in possession of a current, valid
C\RC\ORDkMASSAGE\ 1.3.1 B
14
permit.
"(s) Each massage establishment granted a permit
under this Article shall have a manager on the premises at all
times the massage establishment is open for business. The
operator of each massage establishment shall file a statement
with the Director designating the person or persons who shall
act as manager. The operator, or manager in the operator's
absence, shall be responsible for ensuring compliance with
this Chapter.
"Section 9.24.060 - Same - Facilities.
"Every massage establishment shall maintain facilities
meeting all of the following requirements:
"(a) Signs shall be in conformance with the current
ordinances of the City of Rancho Cucamonga;
"(b) Minimum lighting shall be provided in
accordance with § 1201 of the Uniform Building Code or
successor provision or provisions. In addition, at least one
artificial light of not less than sixty (60) watts shall be
provided in each room or enclosure where massage services
are performed on patrons;
"(c) Minimum ventilation shall be provided in
accordance with
§ 1201 of the Uniform Building Code or successor provision
or provisions;
"(d) Adequate equipment for disinfecting and
sterilizing instruments used in performing the acts of massage
shall be readily available;
"(e) Hot and cold running water shall be provided at
all times;
"(f) Closed cabinets shall be provided for storage of
clean linens;
"(g) Adequate bathing, dressing, locker and toilet facilities shall be
provided patrons. A minimum of two (2) tubs or showers and dressing
rooms containing separate lockers which are capable of being locked must
CXRC\ORDXMAS SAGE\ 1.3.1 B
15
be provided for patrons. Separate toilets, wash basins, bathing and dressing
areas shall be provided for male and female patrons;
"(h) A minimum of one (1) separate wash basin for employees shall be
provided at all times. The basin shall be located within or as close as
practicable to the area devoted to performing of massage services. Sanitary
towels shall also be provided at each basin;
"(i) Pads used on massage tables shall be covered with a durable, washable
plastic or other waterproof material acceptable to the San Bemardino
County Health Department.
"Section 9.24.070 - Same - Inspections.
"The Director, Chief, Development Services Director, and the San
Bemardino County Health Department, or their authorized representatives,
shall have the right to enter the massage establishment for the purpose of
making reasonable unscheduled inspections to observe and enforce
compliance with applicable regulations, laws, and provisions of this
Chapter.
"Section 9.24.080 - Same - Permit Nonassil~nable.
"No massage establishment permit may be sold, transferred or assigned by
the permittee, or by operation of law, to any other person or persons, and
any such sale, transfer or assignment, or attempted sale, transfer or
assignment, shall be deemed to constitute a voluntary surrender of such
permit and such permit shall thereafter be deemed terminated and void;
provided and excepting, however, that if the permittee is a partnership and
one or more of the partners should die, one or more of the surviving partners
may acquire, by purchase or otherwise, the interest of the deceased partner
or partners without effecting a surrender or termination of such permit and
in each case the permittee shall thereafter be deemed to be the surviving
partner(s). One or more proposed partners, in a partnership granted a permit
hereunder, may make application to the Director, together with the fee
established by the City Council therefor, to amend the original application,
providing all information as required for partners in the first instance and,
upon approval thereof, the transfer of the interests of one or more partners to
the proposed partner or partners may occur.
"If the permit is issued to a corporation, stock
may be sold, transferred, issued, or assigned to stockholders
CXRC\ORDXMASSAGE\1.3.1B
16
who have been named on the application. If any stock is
sold, transferred, issued, or assigned to a person not listed on
the application as a stockholder, the permit shall be deemed
terminated and void; provided, however, the proposed
transferee may submit to the Director, together with a fee
established by the City Council, an application to amend the
original application providing all information as required for
stockholders in the first instance, and, upon approval thereof,
the transfer may then occur.
"Section 9.24.090 - Same - Change of Location or Name.
"(a) A change of location may be approved by the Director provided the
massage establishment complies with all ordinances and regulations of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga.
"(b) No permittee shall operate under any name or conduct any
establishment under any designation not specified in the permit.
"(c) Any application for an expansion of a building or other place of
business of a massage establishment shall require compliance with this
Article I.
"Section 9.24.100 - Same - Notification of Change.
"(a) The holder of the permit to operate or conduct a massage establishment
shall notify the Director, in writing, of the name and address of each person
employed, including massage technicians, at such establishment within five
(5) days of said person being employed.
"The requirements of this § 9.24.100 are in addition to the other
provisions of this Chapter, and nothing contained herein shall relieve the
permittee of the responsibility of ascertaining, prior to employment, whether
an employee has a current, valid Massage Technician Permit.
"(b) If, during the term of a permit, the applicant has any change in
information provided on or conceming the original application or permit
renewal application, notification shall be made to the Director in writing,
within ten (10) business days of the change.
"Section 9.24.110 - Same - Renewal of Permit.
CXl{C\ORDX1VIAS SAGE\ 1.3.1 B
17
"A massage establishment licensed under this Article I shall submit an
application for renewal thirty (30) days prior to the expiration thereof. The
renewal application shall be submitted together with the requisite fee as
established by the City Council. Approval of the renewal application shall
be contingent upon satisfactory compliance with all pertinent provisions of
this Article I.
"Section 9.24.120 - Applicability of Regulations to Existing
Businesses.
"The provisions of this Article I shall be applicable to all persons and
businesses described herein whether the described activities were
established before or after the effective date of this Article I, except that
massage establishments legally in business prior to the effective date hereof
shall have six (6) months or until the expiration of their current business
license, whichever is greater, to comply with the terms hereof.
"ARTICLE II. MASSAGE TECHNICIANS
"Section 9.24.200 - Massage Technicians - Permit Required.
"(a) It shall be unlawful for any person to engage in the business of acting
or to act as a massage technician unless such person holds a valid massage
technician permit issued by the City. Each massage technician permit
holder shall be issued a photo identification badge which will also serve as a
massage technician permit. The permit holder shall maintain the massage
technician permit visibly on his or her person during business hours. Each
permit holder shall immediately surrender to the Director any massage
technician permit issued by the City upon the suspension, revocation, or
expiration of such permit.
"(b) A permit under this Section shall be valid for twelve (12) months from
the date of issuance unless revoked or suspended.
"Section 9.24.210 - Same - Application.
"(a) Each applicant for a massage technician permit shall make application
under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Califomia to the
Director. Prior to submitting an application, a nonrefundable fee as
established by the City Council shall be paid to defray, in part, the costs of
investigation and report required by this Article I. A copy of the receipt
shall accompany the application.
CXR. C\ORDXMASSAGE\1.3.1 B
18
"(b) Permit fees required under this Section shall be in addition to any
license, permit or fee required under any other provision of this Code.
"(c) The application for permit does not authorize the applicant to practice
massage. No work is authorized until such permit has been granted.
"(d) Each applicant for a massage technician permit shall submit the
following information:
"1. Truthful and honest answers to each and every inquiry in
§ 9.24.040(d)3 through § 9.24.040(d)7, inclusive, of Article I hereof;
"2. Acceptable written proof that the applicant is at least eighteen
(18) years of age.
"(e) The applicant must fumish proof of passage of the independently
prepared and administered national examination through the National
Certification Board for Therapeutic Massage and Bodywork (NCTMB),
together with current recertifications in accordance with NCTMB
requirements, a diploma or certificate of graduation from either a 500-hour
resident course of instruction or 500 hours of cumulative education
consisting of no less than a 300-hour resident course, and 200 additional
hours of resident instruction from a recognized school of massage as defined
in § 9.24.010(k) of Article I, hereof, or from an existing school or institution
of learning outside the State of Califomia, together with a certified transcript
of the applicant's school records showing date of enrollment, hours of
instruction and graduation from a course having at least the minimum
requirements prescribed by Article 3 of Subchapter 3 of Chapter 21 of
Division 1 of Title 5 of the California Code of Regulations, wherein the
theory, method, profession and work of massage is taught, and a copy of the
schoors approval by the State Board of Education.
Alternatively, the provisions of this subsection (e) may be satisfied by the
applicant receiving 300 hours of resident instruction and having
membership, or the ability to obtain membership, in a qualified massage
association, as defined in § 9.24.0100) of Article I hereof.
"(f') The massage establishment's full name, address and telephone number
where the massage technician will be employed at a fixed place of business.
In the event the applicant seeks to conduct out call massage services not
listed in the original application, an additional application and fee must be
submitted.
"(g) Such other identification and relevant information as the Director may
CXRC\ORDXMASSAGE\1.3.1 B
19
require in order to discover the truth of the matters herein specified as
required to be set forth in the application.
"(h) Two (2) current full face, portrait photographs of the applicant, two (2)
inches by two (2) inches in size.
"(i) The Director may require the applicant to furnish fingerprints when
needed for the purpose of establishing identification. Any required
fingerprinting fees will be the responsibility of the applicant.
"(j) A certificate from a medical doctor licensed to practice in the State of
Califomia stating that the applicant has, within thirty (30) days immediately
preceding the date of application, been examined and found to be free of any
contagious or communicable disease.
"(k) Authorization for the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, its agents and employees to seek information and
conduct an investigation into the truth of the statements set
forth in the application shall be required. The Chief shall
provide such assistance to the Director as may be required to
fully investigate the applicant and the truth of the matters set
forth in the application.
"(1) Authorization to the Director that he or she shall have one hundred
twenty (120) days in which to investigate the application and background of
the applicant. Upon termination of the investigation, the Director shall
approve or deny said application in writing.
"(m) The Director, upon completion of the investigation, shall grant the
permit if he or she finds in accordance with § 9.24.040(d)22(a) through (f),
inclusive, and:
"1. The applicant has furnished an acceptable diploma or certificate
of graduation from a recognized school, or
"2. The applicant has furnished written proof from a recognized
school that the minimum number of hours of instruction have been
completed.
"(n) If the Director, following investigation of the application, determines
that the applicant does not fulfill the requirements as set forth in this
Section, the Director shall deny said application by dated, written notice
forwarded to the applicant's address set forth in the application by U.S.
mail, with a proof of service attached. A new application may not be filed
CLRC\ORDXMAS SAGE\ 13.1B
20
for at least sixty (60) days after such denial. Any applicant for a permit who
is refused a permit by the Director may appeal the denial as set forth in
9.24.440.
"Section 9.24.220 - Same - Renewal.
"A massage technician licensed under this chapter shall file an application to
renew the permit thirty (30) days prior to the date of expiration thereof.
Approval shall be contingent upon satisfactory compliance with all pertinent
sections of this Article II, including a current medical clearance. A renewal
fee as established by the City Council shall be charged to defray, in part, the
cost of the renewal investigation required by this Article II.
"Section 9.24.230 - Same - Notification by Technician.
"If, during the term of a permit, the massage technician has any change in
information submitted on the original or renewal application, the massage
technician shall notify the Director of such change within ten (10) business
days thereafter, in writing.
"Section 9.24.240 - Same - Applicability of Rellulations to
Persons Workinl~ as Massage Technicians on
Effective Date Hereof.
"The provisions of this Article II shall be applicable to all persons working
as massage technicians whether such employment commenced before or
after the effective date of this Chapter, except that massage technicians
legally employed prior to the effective date hereof shall have six (6) months
after the effective date hereof to comply with the terms of this Article II.
"ARTICLE III. OUT CALL MASSAGE SERVICES
"Section 9.24.300 - Out Call Massage Services - Special
Endorsement Required.
"It shall be unlawful for any massage establishment or massage technician to
provide, or to offer to provide, massage at any location except at the place of
business approved for a massage establishment hereunder; provided,
however, that a massage establishment or massage technician may obtain a
special endorsement to the permit issued thereto specifically authorizing out
call massage services.
"Section 9.24.310 - Same - Application.
C\RC\ORDLMASSAGE\ 1.3.1 B
21
"Any massage establishment or massage technician desiring to provide out
call massage services shall submit to the Director, together with the requisite
non-reftmdable fee therefor as established by the City Council, an
application to provide out call massage services within the City of Rancho
Cucamonga. In addition to the requirements set forth herein pertaining to
massage establishment permit or massage technician permit application, as
the case may be, the applicant shall submit detailed information setting forth
the manner and means of transporting, to and from the premises where out
call massage services are to be performed, the clean, sanitary towels,
coverings and linens, sterilized instruments to be utilized, as well as any
supplementary aids, equipment or devices to be utilized and the method(s)
of disposal thereof.
"Section 9.24.320 - Same - Record.
"All massage technicians authorized to perform out call massage services
hereunder shall keep a written record, at the massage technician's principal
place of business, of out call massage services performed as required by §
9.24.050(f) of Article I hereof and shall include therein the location, by
street address including suite or apartment number, where such services
have been performed.
"ARTICLE IV. PROHIBITED CONDUCT, PROCEDURES,
AND PENALTIES
"Section 9.24.400 - Prohibited Conduct.
"(a) It shall be unlawful for any massage technician to touch or massage the
genital area of any patron or the breasts of any female patron or for any
massage establishment to allow or permit such massage.
"(b) It shall be unlawful for a massage technician to perform any massage
services at any location other than that location specified on the massage
technician permit or pursuant to a valid out call endorsement.
"Section 9.24.410 - Suspension Pending Revocation.
"When the grounds for revocation under this Chapter are that the permittee
is suspected of immoral, improper, or otherwise objectionable conduct, the
permit may be suspended until the revocation hearing procedure has been
completed.
"Section 9.24.420 - Revocation - Massage Establishment Permit.
C\RC\ORDMMASSAGE\1.3.1 B
22
"The Director may revoke the massage establishment permit of any person,
firm, partnership or corporation holding the same upon receipt of
satisfactory evidence that the permittee has made a material
misrepresentation on the permit application, or if the permittee, any
managing responsible employee thereof or any of the persons enumerated in
§ 9.24.040(d)12 or § 9.24.040(d) 13 of Article I hereof has been convicted
of or entered a plea of guilty or nolo contendere to any charge of a violation
of any of the provisions of this Chapter, or of the enumerated statutes set
forth in § 9.24.040(d)7 of Article I hereof or any lesser included offense.
"The Director may revoke, after notice and hearing, a massage establishment
permit if, on the basis of satisfactory evidence, it is shown that the permittee,
any managing responsible employee, or any employee, representative, or
agent of the permittee or any massage technician employed by the permittee,
has engaged in conduct constituting a violation of this chapter or of any of
the enumerated statutes set forth in
9.24.040(d)7 of Article I hereof. The Director shall provide the permittee
with written notice of the revocation or proposed revocation by U.S. mail,
with a proof of service attached, addressed to the street address of the
massage establishment as shown on the application.
"Section 9.24.430 - Same - Massage Technician Permit.
"The Director may revoke the massage technician permit of any person
holding the same upon receiving satisfactory evidence that the permittee has
made a material misrepresentation on the permit application or if the
permittee has been convicted of or entered a plea of guilty or nolo
contendere to any charge of a violation of any of the provisions of this
chapter, or any of the enumerated statutes set forth in § 9.24.040(d)7 of
Article I hereof or to a lesser included offense.
"The Director may, after notice and hearing, revoke the massage technician
permit of any permittee if, on the basis of satisfactory evidence it shows that
the permittee has engaged in conduct constituting a violation of this Chapter
or any of the enumerated statutes set forth in § 9.24.040(d)7 of Article I
hereof. The Director shall provide the permittee with written notice of the
revocation by mail, with a proof of service attached, addressed to the
permittee at the address of record shown on the massage technician permit
application.
"Section 9.24.440 - Permit Denial/Revocation Appeal Procedure.
"(a) The applicant or permittee, as the case may be, within ten (10) business
CLRC\ORDMMASSAGE\1.3. IB
23
days after receipt of denial of an application for a permit under Articles I, II
or III, hereof, or notice of revocation, may file an appeal with the City Clerk
to be taken to the Hearing Officer. In the event an appeal is filed within the
ten (10) day time frame, a suspension of the permit shall be in effect until
the final decision has been rendered by the Hearing Officer.
"(b) If the applicant or permittee falls to file an appeal within the ten (10)
day filing period provided herein, denial/revocation shall take effect
immediately upon expiration of such filing period. No permit shall be
revoked until after a heating shall have been held before the Hearing Officer
to determine good cause for such revocation, or the appeal filing period has
lapsed. It is unlawful for any person to conduct a massage establishment or
carry on the business of massage until the revoked permit has been
reinstated by the Heating Officer.
"(c) Notice of such hearing shall be given in writing and mailed at least ten
(10) days prior to the date of the hearing, by U.S. mail, with a proof of
service attached, addressed to the address listed on the massage
establishment application, or massage technician application, as the case
may be. The notice shall state the grounds of the complaint and shall state
the time and place where such hearing will be held.
"(d) After said heating, the Hearing Officer shall render a written decision
within ten (10) business days from the date the matter is submitted for
decision. The action of the Hearing Officer shall be final and conclusive.
"Section 9.24.450 - Burden of Proof at Hearing.
"Unless otherwise specifically provided by law, the burden is on the City in
any hearing under this Article IV to prove that the determination of the
Director which is being appealed is unreasonable, and not an abuse of
discretion."
Section 3. Penalties for Violation of Ordinance or Chapter
It shall be unlawful for any person, firm, partnership, or corporation to violate
any provision or to fail to comply with any of the requirements of this Ordinance or the
Chapter hereby adopted. Any person, firm, partnership or corporation violating any provisions
of this Ordinance or Chapter or failing to comply with any of the requirements thereof shall be
deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be punished by a fine not
exceeding one thousand dollars ($1,000.00), or by imprisonment not exceeding six (6)months,
or by both such fine and imprisonment. Each and every person, firm, partnership, or
CLI~C\ORD~IAS SAGE\ 1.3.1 B
24
corporation shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or any portion
thereof during which any violation of any of the provisions of this Ordinance or the Chapter
hereby adopted is committed, continued or permitted by such person, firm, partnership or
corporation, and shall be deemed punishable therefor as provided in this Ordinance.
Section 4. Civil Remedies Available
The violation of any of the provisions of this Ordinance or the Chapter hereby
adopted shall constitute a nuisance and may be abated by the City through civil process by
means of restraining order, preliminary or permanent injunction or in any other manner
provided by law for the abatement of such nuisances.
Section 5. Severability
The City Council declares that, should any article, provision, section, paragraph,
sentence or word of this Ordinance or the Chapter hereby adopted be or declared invalid by any
final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive
legislative, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences and words of the Chapter
hereby adopted shall remain in full force and effect.
Section 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall
cause the same to be published in the manner prescribed by law.
ADOPTED AND APPROVED this __ day of ,
1996.
Mayor
I, DEBBIE ADAMS, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the
City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the __ day of
C~RC\ORDXIVIAS SAGEX 1.3.1B
25
1996, and was finally passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga held on the __ day of ,1996, by the following
vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAINED:
ATTEST:
City Clerk, City of Rancho Cucamonga
C~R,C\ORDLMASSAGE~ 1.3.1B
26
ORDINANCE NO. 556
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA AMENDING
TITLE 9 OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE BY
ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 9.30 AND
PROHIBITING LOITERING BY MINORS.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Title 9 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code hereby is
amended by the addition of a new Chapter 9.30 to read, in words and figures, as follows:
"Chapter 9.30
"LOITERING BY MINORS PROHIBITED
"Sections:
"9.30.010
"9.30.020
"9.30.030
"9.30.040
Loitering by minors after curfew prohibited.
Daytime loitering by minors prohibited.
Responsibilities of parents, legal guardians
and/or custodians of minors.
Violation - Penalty.
"9.30.010 Loitering by minors after curfew
prohibited. It is unlawful for any minor to loiter, idle,
wander or be in or upon the public streets, highways, roads,
alleys, parks, playgrounds, public buildings or other places
open to the public, places of amusement, eating
establishments, or any vacant lots between the hours of
10:00 p.m. and sunrise immediately following. This
section shall not apply:
"(a) When the minor is accompanied by his
or her parent, legal guardian, or other person having the
care or custody of the minor; or
"(b) When the minor is on a medical
L\RCLRESLOITRXRC 1.3.1B
emergency errand directed by his or her parent, legal
guardian, or other adult person having care or custody of
the minor and the minor can produce written evidence of
same; or
"(c) When the minor is traveling to or from
his or her place of gainful employment or to or from a
medical appointment and the minor can produce written
evidence of same; or
"(d) When, with the approval of the
minor's parent, legal guardian or other adult person having
the care or custody of the minor, such minor is retuming
directly home from a meeting, entertainment, recreational
or school activity, or dance and the minor can produce
written evidence of such approval.
"9.30.020 Daytime loitering by minors
prohibited. It is unlawful for any minor who is subject to
compulsory education or to compulsory continuation
education, to loiter, idle, wander, or be in or upon the
public streets, highways, roads, alleys, parks, playgrounds,
public buildings or other places open to the public, places
of amusement, eating establishments, or any vacant lots
during school hours and on school days applicable to such
minor. This section shall not apply:
"(a) When the minor is accompanied by his
or her parent, legal guardian, or other adult person having
the care or custody of the minor; or
"(b) When the minor is on a medical
emergency errand directed by his or her parent, legal
guardian, or other adult person having care or custody of
the minor and can produce written evidence of same; or
"(c) When the minor is traveling directly to
or from a medical appointment and can produce written
evidence of same; or
"(d) When the minor has in his or her
L\RC\RESLOITR\RC 1.3.1B
2
possession written permission or a permit to leave the
school campus, or is traveling to or from, or is otherwise
engaged in an event or activity sponsored, sanctioned or
arranged for by the minor's school, and in which the minor
is authorized to participate.
"9.30.030 Responsibilities of parents, legal
guardians and/or custodians of minors. It shall be unlawful
for any parent, guardian or custodian of a minor to
knowingly permit or allow such minor to be in violation of
any of the provisions of Section 9.30.010 or 9.30.020 of
this Chapter. In the event of any conflict between this
section and California Penal Code Section 272, or any
successor provision thereto, said Penal Code Section shall
be deemed to govern.
"9.30.040 Penalty for violation. It shall be
unlawful for any person to violate any provision, or fail to
comply with any of the requirements, of this Chapter. A
first, second or third violation occurring within a one (1)
year period shall be punishable by (a) a fine not exceeding
One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) for a first violation; (b) a
fine not exceeding Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00) for a
second violation; (c) a fine not exceeding Five Hundred
Dollars ($500.00) for a third violation.
"A fourth or subsequent violation of any provision
of this Chapter by any person within a one (1) year period
shall be deemed to be a misdemeanor and upon conviction
thereof shall be punishable by a fine not exceeding One
Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00) or by imprisonment not
exceeding six months, or by both such fine and
imprisonment. Each such person shall be deemed guilty of
a separate offense for each and every day or any portion
thereof during which any violation of any of the provisions
of this Chapter is committed, continued or permitted by
such person and shall be deemed punishable therefore as
provided in this Chapter."
Section 2. Civil Remedies Available.
A violation of any of the provisions of this Ordinance shall constitute a
nuisance and may be abated by the City through civil process by means of restraining
L\RCXRESLOITR\RC 1.3. IB
3
order, preliminary or permanent injunction, or in any other manner provided by law for
the abatement of such nuisance.
Section 3. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion
of this Ordinance is for any reason deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the
decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, or by preemptive legislation, such
decision or legislation shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this
Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares that it
would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase
or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections,
sentences, clauses, phrases, or other portions might subsequently be declared invalid or
unconstitutional, or be preempted.
Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance
and shall cause the same to be published in the manner prescribed by law.
1996.
ADOPTED AND APPROVED this
day of
Mayor
I, DEBBIE ADAMS, City Clerk of the City ofRancho Cucamonga, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the
City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the __ day of
1996, and was finally passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga held on the __ day of ,1996, by the following
vote:
AYES:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
L\RC~RESLOITR\RC 1.3.1B
4
ABSENT:
ABSTAINED:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ATTEST:
City Clerk, City of Rancho Cucamonga
LNRCLRESLOITRXRC 1.3.1B
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
June 19, 1996
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. Alexander and Diane Williams,
Park and Recreation Facilities Sub-Committee
NAMING OF THE NORTHEAST COMMUNITY PARK SITE
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommendat that the City Council approve Etiwanda Creek Park as the name for the Northeast
Community Park site, located on East Avenue, north of Summit Avenue.
BACKGROUND
The Park and Recreation Facilities Sub-Committee reviewed the names suggested by the Park and
Recreation Commission (see attached). The Sub-Committee recommends Etiwanda Creek Park as
the name for the Northeast Community Park site. This name was chosen for Etiwanda Creek, the
natural creek bed that traverses the site from north to south on the easterly side of the park site.
Respectfully submitted,
Park and Rec ' Facilities Sub-Committee
Diane Williams
Park and Recreation Facilities Sub-Committee
WJA:DW:km
Attachments
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
June 5, 1996
TO:
FROM:
BY:
Bill Alexander and Diane Williams, Park and Recreation
Facilities Sub-Committee
Joe O'Neil, City Engine~
Karen McGuire-Emery, Associate Park Planner
SUBJECT: NAMING OF THE NORTHEAST COMMUNITY PARK SITE
RECOMMENDATION
That the Park and Recreation Facilities Sub-Committee review the names suggested by the Park and
Recreation Commission and recommend a name to the City Council for Noaheast Park, located on
East Avenue, north of Summit Avenue.
BACKGROUND
At the May 16, Park and Recreation Commission meeting, the Commission reviewed a list of
suggested names prepared by staff, based on the Policy For The Naming Of Park Facilities, a copy
of which is provided. Although not included in the list of suggestions, the Commission selected as
their first choice the name San Sevaine Park, after the historic Sansevain brothers (Pierre and Jean
Louis), two of the many individuals who, during it's existence, managed the winery originally
established by Tiburcio Tapia, and later to be known as Thomas Winery. As their second choice the
Commission selected Etiwanda Creek Park for Etiwanda Creek that traverses the site from north to
south.
/37
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
POLICY FOR TEE
NAMING OF PARK FACILITIES
The following policy is recommended for use in the naming of park
facilities for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. These guidelines
will be used to insure consistency, while minimizing confusion in
the selection of names for new and existing park areas. The
following factors that may be considered are:
If a park site is located adjacent to a school and the
school has been officially named, then the park may be
named after the school. This will minimize facility
identification confusion and encourage the intent of
the City's General Plan which recommends the
school/park complex developments.
If the school has not been officially named the City
shall work with the School District to develop a
mutually acceptable name for the school/park complex.
Contests by students to name the school/park complex
should be encouraged..
If a park site is located near a significant
geographical, historic and/or other physical element,
and is not adjacent to a school, the park may be named
after the significant feature.
A park site may be named after an adjacent street, or
an commemorative event if it is not located adjacent to
a school site or a significant physical element. This
would encompass such park facilities as the Rancho
Cucamonga Neighborhood Center, Red Hill Park and
Heritage Park.
A park site or certain area improvements within park
facilities may be named after individuals or non-profit
organizations if those individuals or organizations
contributed significantly to the development of the
specific park or the general park system within the
City of Rancho Cucamonga. Examples of this would
include Lions Park.
Adopted Oct. 5, 1988
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
May16,1996
TO:
FROM:
BY:
Chairman and Members of the Park and Recreation
Commission
Wm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer~
Karen McGuire-Emery, Associate Park Planner
SUBJECT: NAMING OF THE NORTHEAST COMMUNITY PARK SITE
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Park and Recreation Commission review the suggested names for the
Northeast Park site and select a name for recommendation to the City Council.
BACKGROUND
The Northeast Park site, located on East Avenue, north of Summit, is under construction and
scheduled for completion in August of this year. In accordance with the Commission's Policy for
the Naming of Park Facilities, which is attached for your information, the following names are
suggested by staff:
Summit Park - Since the park is located adjacent to Summit Intermediate School.
Etiwanda Creek Park - The Etiwanda Creek traverses the site on the east end. However, no
other park facility has been named in any way after one of the original 3 communities.
East Avenue Park - For the street location of the park.
Northeast Park - For the overall location in the City and the name by which the park has
come to be known.
/3f
f
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA
MEMORANDUM
June 19, 1996
Mayor ,.end; the City
Rex G~ and Pau Biane' Council
City Council Ad Hoe Committee for the Library Foundation
RECOMMENDED PROCESS FOR FILLING THE
LIBRARY FOUNDATION MEMBERS
We met on June 5, 1996 as the City Council's Ad Hoc Committee (made up of ourselves and Robert
Howdyshell and Edward Swistock) to recommend a process for filling the Library Foundation
members. As you are aware, the Library Board established the Library Foundation at its July 6,
1995 meeting. The purpose of the Library Foundation is to establish a permanent endowment fund
to assist in improving the quality of library services to the citizens of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
The Ad Hoc Committee recommends we run an ad for 15 days requesting applications to serve on
the Library Foundation. A copy of the ad and application to be used is attached for the Council's
review. It is also recommended that appropriate, applicable organizations be notified of the City's
intent to establish a Library Foundation; i.e., Rotary Club of Rancho Cucamonga, Rancho
Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce, Kiwanis Club of Rancho Cucamonga, the local CPA
Association, and the local Bar Association. We also recommend we advertise on the City's R.C.
TV, Channel 3, for applicants to serve on the Library Foundation.
Following the deadline of applications submitted to the Clerk's Office, the Ad Hoc Committee
recommends it interview the applicants and make a recommendation to fill the seven members to
the City Council. Please call us in'advance of the June 19, 1996 City Council meeting if you wish
to recommend changes to our recommendation.
Attachments: Ad
Application
EXCITING OPPORTUNITY!
The City of Rancho Cucamonga opened its new library to the community in Fall of 1994, a
library on the cutting edge of new technology, challenged to provide dynamic and exciting
library programs on a limited budget.
The City of Rancho Cucamonga is now seeking interested individuals to serve on the City's
Library Foundation Board. The city is looking for an individual with a strong intcrest in the
future of libratics, a willingness to plan and implement innovative community fund-raisers and a
desire to be part of the planning of this new city Board. Also of interest are individuals with a
professional background to assist in the areas of legal advice and tax/accounting advise for thc
newly formed Library Foundation.
Applicants must be 18 years old or older and a resident of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
Applications to be submitted .......
CITIZEN'S APPLICATION TO SERVE ON THE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
There are two requirements to serve on the Rancho Cucamonga Public Library Foundation:
1. You must be a resident of the City; and
2. You must be 18 years or older.
Name
Address
Phone: Home Work
Occupation
Education (list highest year completed and all degrees)
Zip Code
PLEASE NOTE: MEMBERSHIP ON THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION WILL
REQUIRE EVENING MEETINGS, THE DATES OF WHICH WILL BE ESTABLISHED.
Are there any workdays or evenings you could not attend meetings? If so, please list:
Why are you interested in this position? (Add additional sheets if necessary)
What do you consider to be your major qualifications?
RANCHO CUCAMONGA PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION APPLICATION
Page 2
Please list your community service background.
What do you see as the major library issues facing the City in the next year? In the next five years?
Do you have any expedence in fundraising? If so, what?
Would you object to fundraising? If so, why?
Would you be able to devote tens hours per month to the Foundation? If not, how many hours could you
spend?
REFERENCES
1.
2.
3.
Date:
Signature
RETURN YOUR APPLICATION TO THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
BY (DATE TO BE DETERMINED) AT 6:00 P.M.
r-
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMO RAND UM
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
June 19, 1996
Members of the City Council
William J. Alex~der and Diane Williams ~
Library Board City Council Subcommittee
RECOMMENDATION TO FILL THE TWO TERMS
EXPIRING ON THE LIBRARY BOARD
The Library Board was established by the City Council on September 6, 1994 and is made up of a
five member board. The two Boardmembers whose terms expire June 30, 1996 are Gina Gregory
and Rebecca Davies.
We are recommending that both these Boardmembers be re-appointed by the City Council in order
to provide a continuity for the Library Board. These two Boardmembers serve as the Library
Board's Planning Task Force which was established just four months ago. Also, the entire Library
Board is working to make the first annual library telethon a success both to raise the community's
awareness of the library and its financial needs.
Since the Board was established two years ago, we believe the Board would best be served by
allowing these two individuals to continue in their capacity as Boardmembers. Their terms would
then be extended to June 30, 1998.
May 23, 1996
City Council
Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Dear Sirs:
My name is Ryan Conner and I am an active Boy Scout with Troop 684. I am presently working
on a merit badge called Citizen in the Commtmity. A requirement of this badge is to find
something in my community that needs improvement.
As a high school sophomore at Alta Loma High School, I have seen many students on their way
to school going East on Baseline and turning left into the student parking lot. Each day there is a
long line of cars waiting for an opening in the oncoming traffic so that they can barely make a
left ram.
At this time of morning there is so much traffic that there doesn't seem to be many breaks in
traffic. The students dart across oncoming cars so as not to be late for class.
As a concerned citizen, with the safety of our young people in mind, I would like to suggest that
the city install a lefi-tum signal across from Villa Del Rey located on Baseline in Rancho
Cucamonga.
I would hope that the City Council would give this suggestion serious consideration, as I have
seen a few accidents and many near misses at this location!
I will be attending your next City Council meeting as another requirement of this badge. Please
let me know when you will be discussing my suggestion.
Very truly yours,
Ryan Conner
9255 Mandarin Ave.
Alta Loma, CA 91701
H E
NCHO
0 F F I C
C
E 0
C
T
Y
M
0
F
A
June 4, 1996
Ryan Conner
9255 Mandarin Avenue
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701
Thank you for your letter of May 23, 1996, concerning pedestrian and traffic movements in
the area ofAlta Loma High School. Your letter has been referred to the Traffic Engineer for
study and preparation of a response which will answer your question.
The City appreciates your concern and interest in traffic conditions around the high school.' ....
The City Traffic section will prepare a report which will analyze the situation and make
recommendations as applicable.
In the meantime, if you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact Paul Rougeau,
Traffic Engineer, at 477-2740.
Very truly yours,
/
William J. Alexander
Mayor
WJA:dlw
CC:
Members of the City Council
Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager
Rick Gomez, Community Development Director
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Paul Rougeau, Traffic Engineer
10500 Civic Center Drive
· P.O, Box 807
Rancno Cucamonga, CA 9'1729
(7'14) 989485'1
FAX (7'14) 987-6499
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
June 19, 1996
William J. il
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA FOR JUNE 19, 1996 ITEM D-14, APPROVAL OF
MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY,
VINTNERS WALK ENCROACHMENT/MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT AND
ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6
FOR PARCEL MAP 13845, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF
FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND ROCHESTER AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY
MASI COMMERCE CENTER PARTNERS
Please remove above said Item D-14 from the City Council Agenda for June 19, 1996. The
Developer has failed to fumish all items as required in the project' s Conditions of Approval.
Relative to Section 66458 of the Subdivision Map Act we have not received the final map for filing.
WJO:dlw
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
SUPPLEMENT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
June 19, 1996
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Dale B. Catron, Facilities Supervisor
SUPPLEMENT TO CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. D-20 RECOMMENDING
THE AWARD AND AUTHORIZATION FOR EXECUTION OF CONTRACT FOR
THE ROOF REPLACEMENT PROJECT FOR THE CIVIC CENTER AND
POLICE STATION TO STONE ROOFING, IN THE AMOUNT OF $212,597.00
($193,270 PLUS 10% CONTINGENCY) TO BE FUNDED FROM APPROVED RDA
1995/96 FUNDS, ACCOUNT NUMBER 17-5100 AND FOR THE ROOF
REPLACEMENT PROJECT FOR THE NINTH STREET CORPORATE YARD
($29,550.00) TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NUMBER 01-4647-7043 AND
THE PUBLIC LIBRARY ($27,875.00), TO BE FUNDED FROM APPROVED RDA
1995/96 FUNDS, ACCOUNT NUMBER 13-5100 TO HUFFMAN ROOFING FOR A
TOTAL AMOUNT OF $63,168.00 ($57,425 PLUS 10% CONTINGENCY)
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
On June 13, 1996, bids were opened for the Roof Replacement Project for the Civic Center and Police
Station. The lowest responsive bidder is Stone Roofing of Azusa, CA., with a bid of $193,270.
Engineering staff and the Roofing Consultant retained by the City have reviewed all bids and found them
to be in accordance with the bid requirements. Staff has completed the required background investigation
and finds that this bidder is in compliance with the requirements of the bid documents.
On June 13, 1996, bids were opened for the Roof Replacement Project for the Ninth Street Corporate Yard
and Library. The lowest responsive bidder is Huffinan Roofing of Riverside, CA. with a total bid amount
of $57,425.00 (Ninth Street Corporate Yard, $29,550.00 and Library, $27.875.00). Engineering staff and
the Roofing Consultant retained by the City have reviewed all bids and found them to be in accordance
with the bid requirements. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds that this
bidder is in compliance with the requirements of the bid documents.
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:DC:dlw
Attachments
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BID RESULTS
CONTRACTOR
CORpORATEYARD AND LIBRARY PROJECT
CORPORATEYARD
LltiRARY
TOTAL
Stone Roofing $37.242 334.536 $71 ,'7711'
Best Roofing $32,500 $30,000 $82.50I)
AAA Roofing 533,474 $31,531 $65,00,~
'JJ Ronfing S~t6,81 O $35,127 $71.937.
Huffman Roofing $29,550 $27,875
POLICE ,e~TATION AND CIVIC CENTF_R PROJECT
CONTRACTOR
POLICE STATION CIVIC CENTER
TOTAL
Stone Roofing $53.410 $13D,86D $193,270
Best RoofinO $60,000 $162,000 $222.000
AAA Roofing $68,997 $223,~34 $292,631
JJ Roofing 548.535 $1 51.227 $19g,762
'Huffman Roo~ng S47.385 $170,770 $218,155
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
SUPPLEMENT
June 19, 1996
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Michael D. Long, Supervising Public Works Inspector
SUPPLEMENT TO CONSENT CALENDER ITEM NO. D-22 RECOMMENDING
THE AWARD AND AUTHORIZATION FOR EXECUTION OF THE
CONTRACT FOR JERSEY BOULEVARD STORM DRAIN AND STREET
IMPROVEMENTS, FROM HAVEN AVENUE TO THE RAILROAD CROSSING,
TO LAIRD CONSTRUCTION, IN THE AMOUNT OF $487,517.97 ($443,198.15
PLUS 10% CONTINGENCY)
BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS
On Tuesday, June 18, 1996, bids were opened for the Jersey Boulevard Storm Drain and Street
Improvements, from Haven Avenue to the railroad crossing, the lowest responsive bidder is Laird
Construction, with a bid of $443,198.15. The Engineer's estimate was $750,000.00. Engineering
staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid
requirements. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds all bidders to
meet the requirements of the bid documents.
Respectively submitted,
City Engineer
WJO:MDL:dlw
Attachment
Engineer's Estimate= $750,000
Bid SummaD· for the Jersey Boulevard Storm Drain and Street Improvements
Bids Opened: 18-Jun-96 at 2:00 PM
Item Description Qty
I Clearing & Grubbing 1
2 Unclassified Excavation CF) 5649
3 Unclassfied Fill (F) 146
4 Crushede Aggregate Base 4548
5 10" Rip Rap 64
6 A.C Pavement & leveling course 7700
7 Cold Plane (Vat. 2" Max.) 4812
8 Pavement Reinforcing Fabric 32478
9 Asphalt Concrete Berm 670
10 Asphal/Concrete Berm (Modified) 9
1 l Adj M.H Frame & Cover 15
12 Adj W.V. Box & Cover 31
13 Catch Basin, W= 21' & Local Depr 1
14 Temp 36" Din CMP CB 3
15 Mahhole No. 4 3
16 Manhole No. 2 1
17 P.C.C. Collar 1
18 Curb side outlets I
19 4" P.C.C. Sidewalk 186
20 24" Dia RCP (2000D) 13
21 30" Din RCP (2000D) 15
22 36" Din RCP (2000D) 13
23 36" Din RCP (1250D) 1154
24 Brick & Mortar Plug
25 17' PCC Encasement for 36': 'Din. 2
RCP (per CCWD Std No. 23
26 Traffic Control 1
Laird Const Gentry Bros.
Unit tinit
Unit Price Price Price Price
LS $13,000.00 $13,000.00 $I 1,000.00 $11,000.00
CY S12.25 $69,200.25 $11.00 $62,139.00
CY $7.00 $1,022.00" $5.00 $730.00
TON $9.65 $43,888.20 $10.00 $45,480.00
SF S7.50 $480.00 $10.00 $640.00
TON $24.15 $185,955.00 $23.50 $180,950.00
SY $1.25 $6,015.00 $1.00 $4,812.00
SY $0.65 $21,110.70 $0.80 $25,982.40
LF $5.00 $3,350.00 $7.00 S4,690.00
LF $5.00 $45.00 $7.00 $63.00
EA $250.00 $3,750.00 $200.00 $3,000.00
EA $50.00 $1,550.00 $20.00 $620.00
EA $5,200.00 $5,200.00 $4,500.00 $4,500.00
EA $1,300.00 $3,900.00 $3,500.00 510,500.00
EA $2,600.00 $7,800.00 54,500.00 $13,500.00
EA 52,300.00 $2,300.00 52,500.00 $2,500.00
EA $540.00 $540.00 $600.00 $600.00
EA $1,600.00 51,600.00 $3.500.00 $3,500.00
SF $3.00 $558.00 $3.00 5558.00
13 $50.00 $650.00 $70.00 $910.00
LF $55.00 $825.00 $75.00 $1,125.00
LF $60.00 $780.00 $85.00 $1,105.00
LF $53.50 $61,739.00 $85.00 $98,090.00
EA $540.00 $540.00 $300.00 $300.00
EA $2,700.00 $5,400.00 $600.00 $1,200.00
LS $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00
$443,198.15 5479,994.40
Item Description Qty
1 Clearing & Grubbing
2 Unclassi~ed Excavation if) 5649
3 Unclass~ed Fill CF) 146
4 Crushede Aggregate Base 4548
5 10" Rip Rap 64
6 A.C Pavement & leveling course 7700
7 Cold Plane [War. 2" Max.) 4812
8 Pavement Reinforcing Fabric 32478
9 Asphalt Concrete Berm 670
10 Asphalt Concrete Berm (Modified) 9
11 AdjM.HFrarae&Cover 15
12 Adj W.V. Box & Cover 31
13 Catch Basin, W= 21' & Local Depr 1
14 Temp 36" Dia CMP CB 3
15 Mahhole No. 4 3
16 Manhole No. 2 I
17 P.C.C. Collar
18 Curb side outlets I
19 4" P.C.C. Sidewalk 186
20 24" Din RCP (2000D) 13
21 30" Din RCP (2000D) 15
22 36" Din RCP (2000D) 13
23 36" Din RCP (1250D) 1154
24 Brick &Mortar Plug I
25 17' PCC Encasement for 36" Din. 2
RCP (per CCWD Std No. 23
26 Traffic Control
Vance Corp Hillcrest Contracting
Unit Unit
tinit Price Price Price Price
LS $43,752.30 $43,752.30 $46.100.00 $46. 100.00
CY $12.50 $70,612.50 $I 1.00 $62.139.00
CY S3.00 $438.00 S5.50 $803.00
TON $10.00 $45,480.00 512.25 S55,713.00
SF S5.00 $320.00 S 17.00 $1,088.00
TON $24.50 $188,650.00 $25.80 $198,660.00
SY $1.00 $4,812.00 $1.20 S5,774.40
SY $0.40 $12,991.20 $0.51 $16,563.78
LF $3.00 $2,010.00 $4.70 S3,149.00
LF $3.00 S27.00 $13.00 $117.00
EA $430.00 $6,450.00 $260.00 $3,900.00
EA S28.00 $868.00 $65.00 S2.015.00
EA 55,600.00 $5,600.00 $6,100.00 $6,100.00
EA S 1,775.00 $5,325.00 $2,200.00 $6,600.00
EA S2,500.00 $7,500.00 $2,900.00 $8,700.00
EA S2, 100.00 $2,100.00 $3,250.00 $3,250.00
EA $320.00 $320.00 $650.00 $650.00
EA $320.00 $320.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00
SF $5.00 $930.00 S5.75 $I,069.50
13 $42.00 S546.00 $68.00 $884.00
LF $47.00 $705.00 $74.00 $I,110.00
LF $60.00 $780.00 $82.00 $1,066.00
LF $60.00 $69,240.00 $57.50 $66355.00
EA $260.00 S260.00 $470.00 $470.00
EA $866.00 $1,732.00 5950.00 SI,900.00
LS $13,000.00 $13,000.00 $6,650.00 $6,650.00
S484,769.00 S502,826.68
Highgrade Engr.
Unit
Price Price
$10,000.00 $10,000.00
$11.00 $62,139.00
$12.50 $1,825.00
$11.00 $50,028.00
$I0.00 $640.00
$26.00 $200,200.00
$1.30 $6,255.60
$0.75 $24,358.50
$2.25 $1,507.50
$2.25 $20.25
$200.00 $3,000.00
$75.00 $2,325.00
$7,500.00 $7,500.00
$4,250.00 $12,750.00
$2,750.00 $8,250.00
$2,500.00 $2,500.00
$850.00 $850.00
$2,000.00 $2,000.00
$3.50 $651.00
$80.00 $1,040.00
$85.00 $1,275.00
$95.00 $1,235.00
$65.00 $75,010.00
$195.00 $195.00
$725.00 $1,450.00
$7,500.00 $7,500.00
$484,504.85
JEG Construction
Unit
Price Price
$24,697.11 $24,697.11
$8.45 $47,734.05
$3.81 $556.26
$14.53 $66,082.44
$2.87 $183.68
$25.31 $194,887.00
$1.28 $6,159.36
$0.87 $28255.86
$3.18 $2,130.60
$27.00 $243.00
$171.00 $2,565.00
$42.00 $ 1,302.00
$3,520.00 $3,520.00
$1,958.00 $5,874.00
$2,420.00 $7,260.00
$2,310.00 $2,310.00
$330.00 $330.00
$880.00 $880.00
$2.49 $463.14
$46.00 $598.00
$71.00 $ 1,065.00
$72.50 $942.50
$75.00 $86,550.00
$440.00 $440.00
$1,430.00 $2,860.00
$15,611.00 $15,611.00
$503,500.00
Bid Summary for the Jersey Boulevard Storm Drain and Street Improvements
18-3un-96 at 2:00 P31
Bids Opened:
Engineer's Estimate= $750,000
Malek Engr.
Unit
Item Description Qty tinit Price Price
I Clearing & Grubbing i LS $35,000.00 $35,000.00
2 Unclassi~ed Excavation (F) 5649 CY $8.00 $45,192.00
3 Unclassfied Fill (F) 146 CY $20.00 $2,920.00
4 Crusherie Aggregate Base 4548 TON $12.00 $54,576.00
5 10" Rip Rap 64 SF $50.00 $3,200.00
6 A.C Pavement & leveling course 7700 TON $28.00 $215,600.00
7 Cold Plane (Vat. 2" Max.) 4812 SY $4.05 $19,486.68
8 Pavement Reinforcing Fabric 32478 SY $0.80 $25,982.40
9 Asphalt. Concrete Berm 670 LF $5.10 $3,417.00
10 Asphalt Concrete Berm (Modified) 9 LF $43.00 $387.00
11 Adj M.H Frame &Cover 15 EA $450.00 $6,750.00
12 Adj W.V. Box & Cover 31 EA $325.00 $10,075.00
13 Catch Basin, W= 21' & Local Depr I EA $4,500.00 $4,500.00
14 Temp 36" Dia CMP CB 3 EA $2,200.00 $6,600.00
15 Mahhole No. 4 3 EA $2,760.00 $8,280.00
16 Manhole No. 2 I EA $2,640.00 $2,640.00
17 P.C.C. Collar I EA $500.00 $500.00
18 Curb side outlets I EA $1,600.00 $1,600.00
19 4" P.C.C. Sidewalk [86 SF $3.00 $558.00
20 24" Dia RCP (2000D) [3 13 $60.00 $780.00
21 30" Dia RCP (2000D) 15 LF $68.00 $1,020.00
22 36" Dia RCP (2000D) 13 LF $68.00 $884.00
23 36" Dia RCP (1250D) 1154 LF $70.00 $80,780.00
24 Brick & Mortar Plug I EA $420.00 $420.00
25 17' PCC Encasement for 36" Dia. 2 EA $1,440.00 $2,880.00
RCP (per CCWD Std No. 23
26 Trafl~c Control I LS $12,000.00 $12,000.00
$546,028.08