Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2005/02/02 - Agenda Packet I:: CITY ©IF NCH© CLICAMONGA 10500 Civic Center Drive g, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730-3801 AGENDAS · Redevelopment Agency · City Council REGULAR MEETINGS 1st and 3rd Wednesdays g, 7:00 p.m. AGENCY~ BOARD & CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS William J. Alexander .................... Mayor Diane Williams ............... Mayor Pro Tern Rex Gutierrez ............................ Member L. Dennis Michael ...................... Member Sam Spagnolo ......................... Member Jack Lam ......................... City Manager James L. Markman ............. City Attorney Debra J. Adams ..................... City Clerk ORDER OF BUSINESS 5:30 p.m. CloSed Session .................... Tapia Conference Room 7:00 p.m. Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting... Council Chambers Regular City Council Meeting ............. Council Chambers INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC ~.RANcHO TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL The City Council encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the Agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the City Council on any agenda item. Please sign in on the clipboard located at the desk behind the staff table. It is important to list your name, address and phone number. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under "Public Communications". There is opportunity to speak under this section at the beginning and the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the City Council should be given to the City Clerk for distribution. To address the City Council, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. All items to be placed on a City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, one week prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's office receives all such items. AGENDA BACK-UP MATERIALS Staff reports and hack-up materials for agenda items are available for review at the City Clerk's counter and the Public Library. A complete copy of the agenda is also available at the sign in desk located behind the staff table during the Council meeting. LIVE BROADCAST Council meetings are broadcast live on Channel 3 for those with cable television access. Meetings are rebroadcast on the second and fourth Wednesdays of each month at 11:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. The City has added the option for customers without cable access to view the meetings "on-demand" from their computers. The added feature of "Streaming Video On Demand" is available on the City's website at www.ci.rancho- cucamonga.ca.uslwhatsnew.htm for those with Hi-bandwidth (DSL/Cable Modem) or Low-bandwidth (Dial-up) Internet service. The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers Located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Members of the City Council also sit as the Redevelopment Agency and the Fire District Board. Copies of City Council agendas and minutes can be found at http:llwww, ci. rancho-cucamonga, ca. us If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477-2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. _~ CITY COUNCIL AGENDA FEBRUARY 2, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY {~]~4CHO HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE L'CAMONGA [ A. CALL TO ORDERI 1. Roll Call: Alexander __, Gutierrez __, Michael__, Spagnolo__, and Williams__. Il ..ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS 1. Presentation of a Proclamation in recognition of the City's long- serving Assistant to the City Manager. Ilc. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. [ID, COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS [ This is the time and p{ace for reports to be made by members of the City Counci{ on matters not on the agenda. IlE. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember or member of the audience for discussion. 1. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 1/12/05 through 1/24/05 and 1 Payroll ending 1/24/05, for the total amount of $4,192,756.65. 2. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for DRC2004-00444, located at 6944 East Avenue, submitted by Winstar 25 Development.  CITY COUNCIL AGENDA FEBRUARY 2, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY ii. CliO HALL, 10500 C~V~C CENTER DRIVE ~c~o~ca RESOLUTION NO. 05-032 27 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND iMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR DRC2004-00444 3. Approval of Map1 Improvement Agreement, Improvement Cash 28 Deposit, Monumentation Cash Deposit and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for Parcel Map 16271, located on the west side of Utica Avenue, north of Jersey Boulevard, submitted by Bakken Industrial Properties, LLC. RESOLUTION NO. 05-033 31 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP 16271, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT CASH DEPOSIT AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT RESOLUTION NO. 05-034 32 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR PARCEL MAP 16271 4. Approval and authorize the execution of a Professional Services Agreement in an amount not to exceed $17,500.00 to AEF Systems 40 Consulting, Inc. (CO 05-006) to assist in the installation of the Municipal Utility Billing Software, to be funded from Acct. No. 17053035309. 5. Approval of a Fee Waiver Agreement by and between the City of 41 Rancho Cucamonga and the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CO O5-0O7). 6. Approval to accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $111,309.00 to the 42 apparent Iow bidder, Dye and Browning Construction, Inc. (CO 05- 008), and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $11,130.90 for the Banyan Community Trail from Sapphire Street to the west city limit, to be funded from Beautification funds, Acct. No. 11103035650/1463110-0. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA FEBRUARY 2, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEET, NG TO BE HELD ,N THE COUNC,L CHAMBERS, C,TY 3 HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE 7. Approval to accept the bids received and award and authorize the 47 execution of the contract in the amount of $957,375.20 to the apparent Iow bidder, Grand Pacific Contractors, Inc. (CO 05-009) and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $95,737.52 for the Emergency Erosion Control Projects, necessary in the wake of the Grand Prix Fire, to be funded from Capital Reserve Funds, Acct. No. 1025001-5300, and appropriate an additional amount of $350,000.00, Acct. No. 1025001-5300 from Capital Reserve Fund balance. 8. Approval to execute a Professional Services Agreement with RBF 52 Consulting (CO 05-010), not to exceed $226,985.00 for the preparation of an Environmental impact Report (DRC2004-01048) for the Carrari Ranch Project in the Rancho Cucamonga's Sphere of Influence, to be funded from the developer deposit through Acct. No. 10013145303. 9. Approval to accept the bids received and award and authorize the 104 execution of the contract in the amount of $252,777.40 to the apparent Iow bidder, Sflvia Construction, Inc. (CO 05-011) and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $25,277.74, for the Hermosa Avenue Street Widening and Pavement Rehabilitation from Highland Avenue te Banyan Street, te be funded from Measure 'T' funds, Acct. No. 11763035650/1299176-0. 10. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 16157, located at the northwest corner of Church Street and Terra Vista 111 Parkway, submitted by Cencours Development Company, LLC and LDC Cougar, LLC. RESOLUTION NO. 05-035 114 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 16157 11. Approval to accept the Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond and file a Notice of Completion for improvements 115 for CUP 96-14, located within the Terra Vista Promenade Shopping Center on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, west of Rochester, submitted by Lewis Development Co. RESOLUTION NO. 05-036 1 17 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR CUP 96-14 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA FEBRUARY 2, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY (.~,[~ANCHO HALL, 10500 CIWC CENTER DRIVE UCAMONG^ 12. Approval to accept the Improvements, release the Faithful 118 Performance Bond and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for CUP 97-32, located at 9146 gth Street, submitted by David L. Manwarren Corporation. RESOLUTION NO. 05-037 '120 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC iMPROVEMENTS FOR CUP 97-32 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 13. Approval to accept the Improvements, release all bonds and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for DR 88-11, located on the southwest corner of Vineyard Avenue and San Bernardino Road, submitted by Edward R. Combs. RESOLUTION NO. 05-038 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 88-11 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 14. Approval to accept the improvements, release all bonds and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for DR 93-05, located on the '124 north side of Arrow Route, approximately 800 feet east of Milliken Avenue, submitted by Lee & Stires, Inc. RESOLUTION NO. 05-039 126 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 93-05 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 15. Approval to accept the Improvements, release all bonds and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for DR 99-52, located at the 127 southwest corner of San Marino Street and Charles Smith Avenue1 submitted by Oltmans Construction Company. RESOLUTION NO. 05-040 129 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 99-52 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA FEBRUARY 2, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY 5 a ,,cHo HALL, 10500 Civic CENTER DRIVE (~UCAMONe^ 16. Approval to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond for DR 99-53, 130 located on the west side of Anaheim Place and Az. usa Court, submitted by Fairway Business Centre, LLC. 17. Approval to accept the Improvements, re[ease all bonds and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for DRC 2001-00275, located 132 on the east side of Helms Avenue between Arrow Route and 9th Street, submitted by Albert and Betty Gutierrez, Trustee of the Gutierrez Family Trust. RESOLUTION NO. 05-041 134 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC 2001-00275 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 18. Approval to accept the Improvements, release all bonds and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for DRC 2002-00185, located 135 on the southeast corner of the knuckle intersection of Dorset Street and Cartilla Avenue, submitted by Rancho Pacific Development Corporation. RESOLUTION NO. 05-042 137 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC 2002-00185 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 19. Approval to accept the Improvements, retain the cash deposit from Permit ROW 2003-00881 in the amount of $250.00 and Permit ROW 138 2004-00617 in the amount of $500.00, for a total of $750.00, in lieu of a Maintenance Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for DRC 2002-00292, located on the southeast corner of White Oak Avenue and Arrow Route, submitted by Cape[lino and Associates. RESOLUTION NO. 05-043 140 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC 2002-00292 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA FEBRUARY 2, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY 6 HALL, 10500 Civic CENTER DRIVE 20. Approval to accept the Improvements, release all bonds and file a 141 Notice of Completion for improvements for DRC 2002-00728, located on the west side of Az_usa Court, west of Milliken Avenue, submitted by Fullmer Construction. RESOLUTION NO. 05-044 143 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC 2002-00728 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 21. Approval to accept the improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond and file a Notice of 144 Completion for improvements for DRC 2002-00306, located on the north side of Alta Loma Drive, approximately 300 feet west of Haven Avenue, submitted by Glenwood Development. RESOLUTION NO. 05-045 146 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC 2002-00306 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 22. Approval to accept the Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bonds and file a Notice of Completion for improvements 147 for Tract 14381 and Tract 14382, located at the northwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Wilson Avenue, submitted by General Electric Capital Corporation. RESOLUTION NO. 05-046 150 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 14381 AND TRACT 14382 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 23. Approval to accept Improvements, re[ease the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond and file a Notice of Completion for 151 improvements for Tract 16264, located on the south side of Mountain View Drive between Milliken Avenue and Terra Vista Parkway, submitted by KB Home Greater Los Angeles, Inc. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA FEBRUARY 2, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY ~RANcHO HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE UCAMONGA RESOLUTION NO. 05-047 153 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 16264 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 24. Approval to accept eh 2004/2005 Local Street Pavement 154 Rehabilitation - Slurry Seal of Various Streets, Contract No. 04-076 as complete, release the bonds, accept a Maintenance Bond, and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $423,942.00. RESOLUTION NO. 05-048 157 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE 2004/2005 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION SLURRY SEAL OF VARIOUS STREETS, CONTRACT NO. 04-076 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK F. CONSENT ORDINANCES I The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non- controversial. The Council will act upon them at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion, No Items Submitted.  [ CITY COUNCIL AGENDA FEBRUARY 2, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMlaERS~ CITY 8 R~NCHO HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. 1. CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT AN ORDINANCE THAT ADOPTS BY 158 REFERENCE COUNTY ORDINANCE 3930 RELATING TO THE INSPECTION GRADING OF FOOD ESTABLISHMENTS ORDINANCE NO. 739 (second reading) 160 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING, BY REFERENCE, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ORDINANCE NO. 3930 RELATING TO iNSPECTION GRADING OF FOOD ESTABLISHMENTS AND AMENDING TITLE 8 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE H. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. No Items Submitted. 1. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS I The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. 1. CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FROM GRANITE EQUITIES (DEVELOPERS OF HENDERSON CREEK PROJECT) TO HAVE 171 THE CITY DESIGNATE HABITAT TRUST AS A QUALIFIED CONSERVATION ENTITY FOR THE PURPOSE OF THE MANAGING 54 ACRES OF OPEN SPACE PURSUANT TO AN OPEN SPACE TRANSFER PLAN IN SATISFACTION OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORq AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE HENDERSON CREEK PROJECT ~ CITY COUNCIL AGENDA FEBRUARY 2, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY 9 I [~CHO HALL, 10500 Civic CENTER DRIVE J. COUNC1L BUSINESS II The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. 1. CONSIDERATION OF CiTY COUNCIL COMMUNITY SERVICES 306 SUBCOMMITTEE'S RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE APPOINTMENTS TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION 2. LEGISLATIVE UPDATE (Oral) K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR THE NEXT MEETING This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this meeting, only identified for the next meeting. L. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS I This is the time and place for the general public to address the .City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. 1. REQUEST FROM EDWARD SANCHEZ TO DISCUSS "MARGARITAVILLE." I, Debra J. Adams, CRy Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on ,January 2'/, 2005, seventy two {72} hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 1/12/2005 through 1/24/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00218637 1/12/2005 AA EQUIPMENT 112.64 AP - 00218637 1/12/2005 AA EQUIPMENT 119.99 AP- 00218637 1/12/2005 AA EQUIPMENT -119.99 AP - 00218638 1/12/2005 AAA APPLIANCE REPAIR 75.95 AP ~ 00218639 1/12/2005 ABC LOCKSMITHS 51.72 AP - 00218640 1/12/2005 ABLAC 273.17 AP- 00218641 1/12/2005 ADAMSON, RONALD 1,518.00 AP- 00218641 1/12/2005 ADAMSON, RONALD 693.00 AP- 00218642 1/12/2005 ADT SECURITY SERVICES INC 331.14 AP- 00218643 1/12/2005 ADVANTEC CONSULTING ENGINEERS 16,982.45 AP - 00218644 1/12/2005 AEF SYSTEMS CONSULTING INC 1,050.00 AP - 00218644 1/12/2005 AEF SYSTEMS CONSULTING INC 4,900.00 AP - 00218645 1/12/2005 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT 144.40 AP- 00218646 1/12/2005 ALLCIT1ES ENTERPRISES 3,100.00 AP - 00218647 1/12/2005 ALL WELDING 185.00 AP- 00218648 1/12/2005 ALLEN, SYLVESTERR 56.85 AP - 00218649 1/12/2005 AMERICA WEST LANDSCAPE INC 85,342.50 AP - 00218649 1/12/2005 AMERICA WEST LANDSCAPE 1NC -8,534.25 AP - 00218650 1/12/2005 AMERICAN CLASSIC SANITATION INC. 213.45 AP- 00218651 1/12/2005 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 191.99 AP-00218652 1/12/2005 ANDERSON, ROGER 75.00 AP - 00218653 1/12/2005 ARCHIBALD PET HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00218653 1/12/2005 ARCHIBALD PET HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00218654 1/12/2005 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 1,152.00 AP - 00218655 1/12/2005 ARRIAGA, KAREN 75.00 AP - 00218656 1/12/2005 ASHA'S BABA 300.00 AP- 00218657 1/12/2005 ASPEN PUBLISHERS INC 173.58 AP - 00218658 1/12/2005 ASTRUM UTILITY SERVICES 11,965.00 AP-00218659 1/12/2005 AUDIO EDITIONS 8.58 AP - 00218660 1/12/2005 AUFBAU CORPORATION 1,622.50 AP - 00218660 1/12/2005 AUFBAU CORPORATION 2,535.00 AP - 00218660 1/12/2005 AUFBAU CORPORATION 1,330.00 AP - 00218660 1/12/2005 AUFBAU CORPORATION 233.75 AP - 00218660 1/12/2005 AUFBAU CORPORATION 547.50 AP - 00218660 1/12/2005 AUFBAU CORPORATION 1,570.00 AP - 00218660 1/12/2005 AUFBAU CORPORATION 925.00 AP - 00218661 1/12/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 199.49 AP - 00218661 1/12/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 452.55 AP- 00218661 1/12/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 58.43 AP - 00218661 1/12/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 66.33 AP - 00218661 1/12/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 56.47 AP-00218662 1/12/2005 BAKER, SHARI 600.00 AP- 00218663 1/12/2005 BARNES AND NOBLE 43.38 AP- 00218665 1/12/2005 BATES, DAWN ELLEN 30.00 AP- 00218666 1/12/2005 BERGELECTRIC CORPORATION 12,146.68 AP - 00218666 1/12/2005 BERGELECTRIC CORPORATION 9,940.00 AP - 00218666 1/12/2005 BERGELECTRIC CORPORATION -1,214.67 AP - 00218666 1/12/2005 BERGELECTRIC CORPORATION 11.23 AP - 00218666 1/12/2005 BERGELECTRIC CORPORATION -994.00 AP- 00218666 1/12/2005 BERGELECTRICCORPORATION -1.13 AP- 00218667 1/12/2005 BISHOP COMPANY 70.22 AP- 00218668 1/12/2005 BOOKS ON TAPE INC 232.74 AP- 00218668 1/12/2005 BOOKS ON TAPE INC 85.34 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 1 Current Date: 01/25/20¢ Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: ~ 10:31:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 1/12/2005 through 1/24/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00218668 1/12/2005 BOOKS ON TAPE INC 175.85 AP- 00218668 1/12/2005 BOOKS ON TAPE INC 362.90 AP - 00218668 1/12/2005 BOOKS ON TAPE INC 89.65 AP-00218670 1/12/2005 BRODART BOOKS 836.41 AP- 00218670 1/12/2005 BRODART BOOKS 276.12 AP- 00218671 1/12/2005 BRUNO, SARAH 4,643.00 AP- 00218672 1/12/2005 BURTRONICS BUSINESS SYSTEMS 120.97 AP- 00218672 1/12/2005 BURTRONICS BUSINESS SYSTEMS 587.87 AP- 00218674 1/12/2005 CABOT INDUSTRIAL TRUST 654.94 AP - 00218675 1/12/2005 CAL PERS LONG TERM CARE 315.92 AP - 00218676 1/12/2005 CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC ENTRY 150.00 AP - 00218677 1/12/2005 CALIFORNIA LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 120.00 AP- 00218678 1/12/2005 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 22.50 AP - 00218679 1/12/2005 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 25.00 AP-00218680 1/12/2005 CAMERON WELDING 36.20 AP- 00218681 1/12/2005 CASK N CLEAVER 51.00 AP - 00218682 1/12/2005 CBIZ ACCOUNTING TAX & ADVISORY OF ORA1 5,000.00 AP - 00218682 1/12/2005 CBIZ ACCOUNTING TAX & ADVISORY OF ORAl 5,000.00 AP - 00218683 1/12/2005 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 845.84 AP - 00218683 1/12/2005 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 36.93 AP - 00218684 1/12/2005 CENTRAL CITIES SIGNS INC 1,082.67 AP - 00218684 1/12/2005 CENTRAL CITIES SIGNS INC 310.86 AP - 00218685 1/12/2005 CHAFI~EY JOINT UNION HS DISTRICT 903.40 AP - 00218686 1/12/2005 CHARTER MEDIA INC. 875.20 AP - 00218686 1/12/2005 CHARTER MEDIA INC. 875.20 AP - 00218686 1/12/2005 CHARTER MEDIA INC. 1,254.00 AP - 00218686 1/12/2005 CHARTER MEDIA INC. 762.00 AP - 00218687 1/12/2005 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 300.00 AP - 00218688 1/12/2005 CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. 16.50 AP - 00218689 1/12/2005 CLOUTIER, RAYMOND 10.00 AP- 00218690 1/12/2005 COMP USA INC 465.97 AP- 00218690 1/12/2005 COMP USAINC 2,257.66 AP - 00218690 1/12/2005 COMP USA INC 1,525.50 AP- 00218690 1/12/2005 COMP USAINC 122.30 AP - 00218690 1/12/2005 COMP USA INC 934.30 AP - 00218691 1/12/2005 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS ] 441.72 AP - 00218692 1/12/2005 COURT TRUSTEE 200.00 AP - 00218693 1/12/2005 COURT TRUSTEE 118.50 AP - 00218694 1/12/2005 CREWS, SHIRLEY 100.24 AP - 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 172.48 AP - 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 23.63 AP - 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 105.78 AP - 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 121.78 AP - 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 634.57 AP - 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 226.43 AP - 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 282.78 AP - 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 63.58 AP - 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 473.11 AP - 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,076.28 AP - 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 431.13 AP - 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 677.23 AP - 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 268.98 AP - 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 96.58 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 2 Current Date: 01/25/20¢ Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time~/ 10:31:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 1/12/2005 through 1/24/2005 .Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 23.63 AP - 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 206.98 AP- 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 97.73 AP - 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 128.68 AP- 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 40.58 AP - 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 88.53 AP - 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 34.83 AP- 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 117.28 AP - 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 154.08 AP- 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 283.93 AP - 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 358.22 AP - 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 416.18 AP - 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 338.56 AP- 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 845.13 AP - 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 60.13 AP - 00218697 1/I2/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 187.33 AP - 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 79.33 AP - 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 140.18 AP - 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 272.53 AP - 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 23.63 AP - 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 23.63 AP - 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 173.63 AP - 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 105.78 AP - 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 242.63 AP - 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 439.28 AP - 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,145.97 AP - 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 721.62 AP - 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 111.53 AP - 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 82.78 AP - 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2,160.17 AP - 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 109.23 AP - 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 82.78 AP - 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 221.93 AP - 00218697 1/12/2005 CLICAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 54.38 AP - 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 87.38 AP - 00218697 1/12~2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 90.83 AP - 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 118.78 AP - 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 203.53 AP - 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 318.53 AP - 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA.VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 331.18 AP - 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 48.63 AP - 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 326.58 AP - 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 343.83 AP - 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 254. I3 AP - 00218697 1/12/2005 CLICAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 558.09 AP - 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 86.23 AP - 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 454.23 AP - 00218697 1/12/2005 CIJCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 307.03 AP- 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 308.18 AP- 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 336.93 AP - 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,026.83 AP - 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 38.28 AP - 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 46.33 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 3 Current Date: 01/25/2012 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time.~ 10:31:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 1/12/2005 through 1/24/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 95.43 AP - 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 196.53 AP - 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 128.78 AP- 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 155.23 AP - 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 946.33 AP- 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 830.98 AP - 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 76.23 AP- 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 85.43 AP- 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 247.23 AP - 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 298.88 AP - 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 159.83 AP- 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 845.13 AP- 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,187.83 AP - 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 152.83 AP- 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 147.18 AP - 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 52.08 AP - 00218697 1/12/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 38.28 AP- 00218699 1/12/2005 D 7 CONSULTING INC 900.00 AP- 00218701 1/12/2005 DAY, WINONA 75.00 AP - 00218702 1/12/2005 DEAN, CRYSTAL 81.00 AP - 00218703 1/12/2005 DELTA MICROIMAGING INC 1,064.01 AP - 00218704 1/12/2005 DODT, HEATHER 34.00 AP - 00218705 1/12/2005 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 14.32 AP - 00218705 1/12/2005 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 514.85 AP - 00218705 1/12/2005 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION -29.02 AP - 00218707 1/12/2005 EMCOR SERVICE 6,150.00 AP- 00218708 1/12/2005 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS 259.01 AP - 00218709 1112/2005 EMPIRE MOBILE HOME SERVICE 7,110.00 AP- 00218710 1/1212005 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 113.39 AP - 00218710 1/12/2005 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 204.29 AP - 00218712 1/12/2005 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 24.69 AP - 00218712 1/12/2005 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 20.93 AP- 00218712 1/12/2005 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 17.98 AP - 00218712 1/12/2005 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 30.93 AP - 00218712 1/12/2005 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 8.26 AP - 00218713 1/12/2005 FELIX, ADRIAN 20.00 AP - 00218714 1112/2005 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 493.00 AP - 00218714 1/12/2005 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 936.00 AP- 00218714 1/12/2005 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 535.50 AP - 00218714 1/12/2005 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 459.00 AP- 00218714 1/12/2005 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 578.00 AP- 00218714 1/12/2005 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 901.00 AP- 00218714 1/12/2005 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 1,160.25 AP - 00218714 1/12/2005 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 720.00 AP- 00218714 1/12/2005 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 651.00 AP- 00218714 1/12/2005 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 840.00 AP- 00218714 1/12/2005 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 651.00 AP - 00218714 1/12/2005 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 630.00 AP- 00218715 1/12/2005 FLO-SYSTEMS INC 1,313.00 AP- 00218716 1/12/2005 FOREMOST PROMOTIONS 3,047.49 AP- 00218717 1/12/2005 FRITO LAY INC 502.92 AP- 00218718 1/12/2005 FUKUSHIMA, JUDITH 1,815.00 AP- 00218719 1/12/2005 FULWOOD, DANA 75.00 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 4 Current Date: 01/25/20C Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time~ ! 10:31:d 7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 1/12/2005 through 1/24/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00218720 1/12/2005 GALE GROUP,THE 54.16 AP- 00218720 1/12/2005 GALE GROUP,THE 175.06 AP- 00218721 1/12/2005 GARCIA, VIVIAN 25.50 AP- 00218722 1/12/2005 GARNATZ, DEANNA 81.00 AP- 00218723 1/12/2005 GAUNT, DARYL 75.00 AP - 00218724 1/12/2005 GILKEY RPT, KATHLEEN 170.00 AP - 00218725 1/12/2005 GLOBAL PRESENTER 754.25 AP-00218725 1/12/2005 GLOBAL PRESENTER 9,805.25 AP - 00218725 1/12/2005 GLOBAL PRESENTER 83,082.45 AP- 00218726 1/12/2005 GOLDENWEST DISTRIBUTING 25.32 AP - 00218727 1/12/2005 GONSALVES AND SON,JOE A 2,500.00 AP- 00218728 1/12/2005 GRAINGER, WW 618.70 AP- 00218728 1/12/2005 GRAINGER, WW 53.29 AP- 00218728 1/12/2005 GRAINGER, WW 2,434.38 AP - 00218728 1/12/2005 GRA1NGER, WW 3,011.99 AP- 00218729 1/12/2005 GRUENEICH RESOURCE ADVOCATES 12,313.40 AP - 00218730 1/12/2005 H2 ENVIRONMENTAL 3,500.00 AP- 00218731 1/12/2005 HAAKEREQU1PMENT CO 1,055.51 AP-00218732 1/12/2005 HAKIMI, SUSAN 272.88 AP - 00218733 1/12/2005 HARALAMBOS BEVERAGE COMPANY 664.55 AP - 00218734 1/12/2005 HARDY, BRADLEY 260.50 AP - 00218735 1/12/2005 HCS CUTLER STEEL CO 67.66 AP - 00218735 1/12/2005 HCS CUTLER STEEL CO 96.40 AP - 00218735 1/12/2005 HCS CUTLER STEEL CO 98.74 AP - 00218737 1/12/2005 HDL SOFTWARE LLC. 2,000.00 AP- 00218739 1/12/2005 HUANG, PRUDENCE 1,125.00 AP - 00218740 1/12/2005 HUGHES SUPPLY INC 4,312.96 AP- 00218740 1/12/2005 HUGHES SUPPLY INC -145.14 AP - 00218740 1/12/2005 HUGHES SUPPLY INC -35.45 AP - 00218740 1/12/2005 HUGHES SUPPLY INC -394.20 AP - 00218740 1/12/2005 HUGHES SUPPLY INC 9,337.95 AP - 00218741 1/12/2005 HUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN BERNARD1NO VALI 193.00 AP - 00218741 1/12/2005 HUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN BERNARDINO VAL1 242.00 AP - 00218742 ' 1/12/2005 HURST, CHERYL 288.50 AP- 00218743 1/12/2005 HYDRO TEK SYSTEMS INC 609.19 AP - 00218744 1/12/2005 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 115.54 AP - 00218744 1/12/2005 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 82.87 AP - 00218746 1/12/2005 INLAND EMPII~E MAGAZINE 895.00 AP - 00218748 1/12/2005 INLAND FAIR HOUSING AND MEDIATION 27.50 AP - 00218748 1/12/2005 INLAND FAIR HOUSING AND MEDIATION 22.50 AP - 00218749 1/12/2005 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 70.00 AP - 00218749 1/12/2005 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 492.20 AP - 00218749 1/12/2005 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 217.35 AP - 00218749 1/12/2005 INLAND VALLEY DALLY BULLETIN 161.00 AP - 00218749 1/12/2005 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 653.20 AP - 00218749 1/12/2005 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 227.70 AP - 00218749 1/12/2005 INLAND VALLEY DALLY BULLETIN 279.45 AP - 00218749 1/12/2005 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 158.70 AP - 00218749 1/12/2005 INLAND VALLEY DALLY BULLETIN 322.00 AP - 00218749 1/12/2005 INLAND VALLEY DALLY BULLETIN 370.30 AP- 00218750 1/12/2005 ISEC INCORPORATED 399.19 AP- 00218750 1/12/2005 ISEC INCORPORATED 308.75 AP- 00218750 1/12/2005 ISEC INCORPORATED -30.87 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 5 Current Date: 01/25/20C Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time.~ 10:31:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 1/12/2005 through 1/24/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00218750 1/12/2005 ISEC INCORPORATED -39.92 AP-00218751 1/12/2005 ISHERWOOD, LINDA 75.00 AP- 00218752 1/12/2005 JANECEK, LINDA 65.56 AP-00218753 1/12/2005 JENKINS, AISHA 138.00 AP- 00218753 1/12/2005 JENKINS, AISHA 76.00 AP- 00218754 1/12/2005 JOHNSON POWER SYSTEMS 11,125.90 AP- 00218755 1/12/2005 JONES, BOB 2,240.00 AP- 00218757 1/12/2005 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC 71,813.28 AP - 00218757 1/12/2005 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC 1,442.76 AP- 00218758 1/12/2005 KAPCO 1,154.27 AP- 00218759 1/12/2005 KB HOME 286.10 AP- 00218760 1/12/2005 KC PRINTING & GRAPHICS INC 245.67 AP- 00218762 1/12/2005 KORANDACONSTRUCTION 748.50 AP - 00218762 1/12/2005 KORANDA CONSTRUCTION 798.50 AP - 00218765 1/12/2005 LEWIS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY 3,000.00 AP- 00218766 1/12/2005 LONG, SUE 75.00 AP- 00218767 1/12/2005 LUCILLES SMOKEHOUSE BBQ 100.00 AP- 00218768 1/12/2005 MANELA, ROSARIO 4.00 AP- 00218768 1/12/2005 MANELA, ROSARIO 78.00 AP- 00218769 1/12/2005 MANSF1ELD, DEBBIE 75.00 AP - 00218771 1/12/2005 MARTIN FIRE PROTECTION INC 27.20 AP - 00218772 1/12/2005 MARTINEZ, ILEIDIS 75.00 AP - 00218773 1/12/2005 MIDWEST TAPE 22.99 AP- 00218773 1/12/2005 MIDWEST TAPE 31.97 AP - 00218773 1/12/2005 MIDWEST TAPE 22.99 AP - 00218773 1/12/2005 MIDWEST TAPE 18.99 AP- 00218773 1/12/2005 MIDWEST TAPE 333.86 AP- 00218773 1/12/2005 MIDWEST TAPE 27.98 AP - 00218774 1/12/2005 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 96.00 AP - 00218775 1/12/2005 MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC & ELECTRONICS USA I~ 293.09 AP - 00218775 1/12/2005 MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC & ELECTRONICS USA R -29.31 AP - 00218775 1/12/2005 MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC & ELECTRONICS USA R -366.38 AP - 00218775 1/12/2005 MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC & ELECTRONICS USA I~ 3,663.76 AP - 00218776 1/12/2005 MOBILE MODULAR MANAGEIvIENT CORP 312.48 AP - 00218777 1/12/2005 MORELLO, BETSY 547.00 AP - 00218778 1/12/2005 MORRISON, MIKE 75.00 AP - 00218779 1/12/2005 MRS NELSONS TOY AND BOOK STORE 227.73 AP- 00218780 1/12/2005 MURRAY & ASSOCIATES, BOB 4,320.11 AP - 00218781 1/12/2005 N M A DUES C/O DAVID MCDONALD 8.31 AP - 00218783 1/12/2005 NATIONAL DEFERRED 24,358.96 AP- 00218784 1/12/2005 NESTOR TRAFFIC SYSTEMS 33,840.00 AP - 00218785 i/12/2005 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS 46.28 AP - 00218785 1/12/2005 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS 46.28 AP - 00218785 1/12/2005 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS 46.28 AP - 00218786 1/12/2005 NEWPORT TRAFFIC STUDIES 648.00 AP- 00218787 1/12/2005 NOLO PRESS 117.23 AP - 00218788 1/12/2005 O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC 226.44 AP - 00218788 1/12/2005 O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC 44.45 AP - 00218788 1/12/2005 O C B REPROGRAPHiCS INC 83.51 AP- 00218788 1/12/2005 O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC 48.49 AP - 00218789 1/12/2005 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIF(3 47.60 AP- 00218790 1/12/2005 OCLC INC 24.60 AP- 00218791 1/12/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 181.92 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 6 Current Date: 01/25/213t2 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Timex 10:31:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 1/12/2005 through 1/24/2005 Check No. Check Date yendor Name Amount AP-00218791 1/12/2005 OFFICE DEPOT -7.41 AP- 00218791 1/12/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 9.27 AP-00218791 1/12/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 35.75 AP- 00218791 1/12/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 493.39 AP- 00218791 1/12/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 98.79 AP - 00218791 1/12/2005 OFFICE DEPOT -293.19 AP- 00218791 1/12/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 475.57 AP- 00218791 1/12/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 7.67 AP-00218791 1/12/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 31.66 AP- 00218791 1/12/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 22.16 AP - 00218791 1/12/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 276.57 AP- 00218791 1/12/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 19.14 AP - 00218791 1/12/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 83.26 AP-00218791 1/12/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 32.61 AP- 00218791 1/12/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 604.26 AP-00218791 1/12/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 56.46 AP- 00218791 1/12/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 175.33 AP- 00218791 1/12/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 78.36 AP-00218791 1/12/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 17.46 AP - 00218791 1/12/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 600.17 AP-00218791 1/12/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 19.52 AP- 00218791 1/12/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 170.84 AP-00218791 1/12/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 33.19 AP- 00218792 1/12/2005 ONO, JUSTINA 75.00 AP - 00218793 1/12/2005 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 571.00 AP - 00218793 1/12/2005 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 271.05 AP - 00218794 1/12/2005 PACIFIC PLUM~ING SPECIALTIES 2,500.00 AP - 00218794 1/12/2005 PACIFIC PLUMBING SPECIALTIES 426.57 AP - 00218795 1/12/2005 PERRY, ANTHONY 76.60 AP - 00218796 1/12/2005 PHOENIX GROUP INFORMATION SYSTEMS 255.51 AP - 00218797 1/12/2005 PIONEER MANUFACTURING 1,293.45 AP - 00218798 1/12/2005 PMI 1,078.20 AP - 00218799 1/12/2005 POLLEMA, JERRIS 100.00 AP - 00218802 1/12/2005 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 143.01 AP- 00218803 1/12/2005 PREVICH, DEBBIE 75.00 AP - 00218804 1/12/2005 PREWETT, KENNETH 62.70 AP - 00218805 1/12/2005 PRIZIO CONSTRUCTION INC 83,736.27 AP - 00218805 1/12/2005 PRIZIO CONSTRUCTION INC ' -7,135.72 AP - 00218805 1/12/2005 PRIZIO CONSTRUCTION INC -1,370.48 AP - 00218805 1/12/2005 PRIZIO CONSTRUCTION INC -321.78 AP- 00218805 1/12/2005 PRIZIO CONSTRUCTION INC 3,217.76 AP - 00218805 1/12/2005 PRIZIO CONSTRUCTION INC 13,704.79 AP- 00218805 1/12/2005 PRIZIOCONSTRUCTION INC 71,348.26 AP - 00218805 1/12/2005 PRIZIO CONSTRUCTION INC -8,373.63 AP - 00218806 1/12/2005 PRYOR, JENNY 75.00 AP-00218807 1/12/2005 QUINTANA, ZITA 193.00 AP- 00218808 1/12/2005 RADECKI, DEBBIE 81.00 AP- 00218810 1/12/2005 RECORDED BOOKS LLC 6.42 AP - 00218810 1/12/2005 RECORDED BOOKS LLC 7.49 AP - 00218811 1/12/2005 REINHARDTSEN, DEBRA 282.50 AP-00218812 1/12/2005 REYESTRUST 24.60 AP- 00218812 1/12/2005 REYES TRUST 162.00 AP - 00218813 1/12/2005 RIVERSIDE CO DEPT CHILD SUPPORT 250.00 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 7 Current Date: 01/25/20C Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time7 10:31:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 1/12/2005 through 1/24/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00218814 1/12/2005 RIVERSIDE CO DEPT CHILD SUPPORT 226.00 AP- 00218815 1/12/2005 RODRIGUES, NIKKI 39.00 AP-00218816 1/12/2005 ROSAS, LIRIO 15.39 AP - 00218817 1/12/2005 SAFETRAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION ELECTRO 587.76 AP- 00218819 1/12/2005 SANBERNARDINO COUNTY 276.00 AP - 00218819 1/12/2005 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 276.00 AP- 00218819 1/12/2005 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 368.00 AP - 00218820 1/12/2005 SAN BERNARDINO CTY CHILD SUPPORT PAYM 213.50 AP - 00218821 1/12/2005 SAN BERNARDINO, CITY OF 600.00 AP - 00218822 1/12/2005 SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM CO INC 441.75 AP- 00218823 1/12/2005 SCCCA 30.00 AP - 00218824 1/12/2005 SCOTT, DIANA 250.00 AP - 00218825 1/12/2005 SENECHAL, CALVIN 182.00 AP - 00218825 1/12/2005 SENECHAL, CALVIN 56.00 AP- 00218825 1/12/2005 SENECHAL, CALVIN 68.00 AP- 00218826 1/12/2005 SHINKLE, MICHELLE 150.00 AP- 00218827 1/12/2005 SMART AND FINAL 85.27 AP - 00218827 1/12/2005 SMART AND FINAL 122.68 AP - 00218830 1/12/2005 STERLING COIq~EE SERVICE 45.75 AP - 00218830 1/12/2005 STERLING COI~PI:E SERVICE 115.28 AP- 00218831 1/12/2005 STOFA, JOSEPH 15.00 AP - 00218832 1/12/2005 SULLY-MILLER CONTRACTING COMPANY 280,791.30 AP - 00218832 1/12/2005 SULLY-MILLER CONTRACTING COMPANY -28,079.13 AP-00218834 1/12/2005 TARGET 43.99 AP- 00218834 1/12/2005 TARGET 100.29 AP - 00218835 1/12/2005 TEMECULA MECHANICAL INC 28,860.26 AP - 00218835 1/12/2005 TEMECULA MECHANICAL INC 22,537.67 AP - 00218835 1/12/2005 TEMECULA MECHANICAL INC 278.93 AP - 00218835 1/12/2005 TEMECULA MECHANICAL INC -2,886.02 AP - 00218835 1/12/2005 TEMECULA MECHANICAL INC -2,253.77 AP - 00218835 1/12/2005 TEMECULA MECHANICAL INC -27.89 AP- 00218836 1/12/2005 TOBIN, RENEE 41.51 AP - 00218837 1/12/2005 TURCH AND ASSOCIATES, DAVID 8,000.00 AP - 00218838 1/12/2005 ULTIMATE STAFFING SERVICES ABACUS ST/M: 732.04 AP - 00218839 1/12/2005 LrMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION 759.00 AP - 00218840 1/12/2005 UNDERGROI3ND SVC ALERT OF SO CAL 186.20 AP - 00218842 1/12/2005 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P~ 995.69 AP - 00218843 1/12/2005 UNIQUE MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC 614.87 AP - 00218844 1/12/2005 UNITED CALIFORNIA FACTORS 28.02 AP - 00218845 1/12/2005 UNITED RENTALS NORTHWEST INC 31,910.56 AP - 00218846 1/12/2005 UNITED TRAFFIC 7,475.70 AP - 00218846 1/12/2005 UNITED TRAFFIC 3,010.54 AP - 00218847 1/12/2005 UNITED WAY 580.32 AP- 00218848 1/12/2005 UNITEK TECHNOLOGY INC 947.12 AP - 00218848 1/12/2005 UNITEK TECHNOLOGY 1NC 205.00 AP- 00218850 1/12/2005 VARNEY, GARY 118.51 AP- 00218851 1/12/2005 VEND U CO 43.10 AP- 00218851 1/12/2005 VEND U CO 43.10 AP - 00218852 1/12/2005 VIGILANCE, TERRENCE 550.00 AP - 00218853 1/12/2005 VILLANE, ELISA 75.00 AP - 00218854 1/12/2005 VIRTUAL PROJECT MANAGER INC 500.00 AP - 00218854 1/12/2005 VIRTUAL PROJECT MANAGER INC 500.00 AP- 00218855 1/12/2005 VOLM, LIZA 112.50 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 8 Current Date: 01/25/213C Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT-RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time~ 10:3 (9 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 1/12/2005 through 1/24/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00218856 1/12/2005 WARD, DESIREE 452.50 AP- 00218858 1/12/2005 WHITEMAN, LINDA 75.00 AP - 00218859 1/12/2005 WILBERTON, DENISE 264.00 AP-00218860 1/12/2005 WILLDAN ASSOCIATES 5,850.50 AP- 00218860 1/12/2005 WlLLDAN ASSOCIATES 749.50 AP- 00218861 1/12/2005 XEROX CORPORATION 929.35 AP- 00218861 1/12/2005 XEROX CORPORATION 176.33 AP- 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CAL1FORNIAEDISON 14.15 AP- 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.13 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.50 AP- 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 132.83 AP- 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 395.55 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 28.39 AP- 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.65 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.98 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 7.36 AP- 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.15 AP- 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.50 AP- 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 51.97 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.86 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 155.66 AP- 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 234.72 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 88.14 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.41 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.30 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.60 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALII~ORNIA EDISON 22.75 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.75 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 28.82 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.00 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.50 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.50 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.84 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 40.60 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.50 AP - 00218868 l/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 48.22 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 96.60 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 180.59 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 62.29 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.51 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 89.41 AP- 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 4.13 AP- 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.13 AP- 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.65 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.00 AP- 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 199.55 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 3,479.62 AP- 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUYrHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.10 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 108.53 AP- 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,942.91 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.60 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 58.68 AP- 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORN1AEDISON 109.6I User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 9 Current Date: 01/25/2012 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Timep~ 10:31:4 '7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 1/12/2005 through 1/24/2005 Check No. .Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 304.38 AP- 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 83.61 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.50 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.25 AP- 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.98 AP- 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.24 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.60 AP- 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.24 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.65 AP- 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 37.35 AP- 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 127.70 AP- 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.14 AP- 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAEDISON 108.58 AP- 00218868 1/13/2005 SOLITHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.14 AP- 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.52 AP- 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.14 AP- 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 102.18 AP- 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.92 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 890.06 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 76.21 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 71.19 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.51 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.92 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.65 AP- 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDIS ON 15.50 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.75 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 160.84 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDIS ON 61.32 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.28 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.65 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.39 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 27.83 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.65 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.65 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 78.94 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.14 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.41 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 52.41 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.01 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 126.54 AP- 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.98 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 119.22 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.64 AP- 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 74.35 AP- 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 91.31 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.64 AP - 00218868 1/I 3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 155.85 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.65 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.50 AP - 00218868 1/i 3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.50 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 52.50 AP- 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.14 AP- 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALI~ORNIAEDISON 15.14 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 10 Current Date: 01/25/20C Report:CK AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 10:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 1/12/2005 through 1/24/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP- 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.50 AP- 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 133.00 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDIS ON 15.14 AP- 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.65 AP- 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 127.54 AP- 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 135.22 AP- 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDIS ON 15.36 AP- 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 51.92 AP- 00218868 1113/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 77.16 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.65 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 112.55 AP- 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 116.90 AP- 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 11,566.70 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 37.34 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.77 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 778.90 AP- 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 4,553.14 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19,980.35 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 130.69 AP- 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 128.47 AP- 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 199.30 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.78 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.51 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.15 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.50 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.14 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTI-I~RN CALIICtORIqlA EDISON 18.84 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.50 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 0.28 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.60 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 8,060.40 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 40.29 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 34.48 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 118.54 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOIJTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 208.63 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 55.62 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 65.46 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 3,331.27 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.13 AP- 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 55.83 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 513.27 AP- 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTFiERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 3,380.81 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.15 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 47.09 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.03 AP- 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 84.19 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.50 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 36.29 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 196.14 AP- 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTI-IERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 110.18 AP - 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.92 AP- 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 129.06 AP- 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.56 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 11 Current Date: 01/25/20C Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Tim~:/ 10:31:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 1/12/2005 through 1/24/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP- 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 156.05 AP- 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.65 AP- 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.28 AP- 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.96 AP- 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.86 AP- 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.14 AP- 00218868 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.00 AP - 00218869 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 280.00 AP- 00218870 1/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 192.96 AP - 00218871 1/18/2005 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMME1 25.00 AP - 00218871 1/18/2005 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 25.00 AP- 00218873 1/19/2005 A AND A AUTOMOTIVE 458.01 AP- 00218874 1/19/2005 A+ TUTORING 24.50 AP- 00218875 1/19/2005 ABC LOCKSMITHS 532.62 AP-00218875 1/19/2005 ABC LOCKSMITHS 64.65 AP- 00218875 1/19/2005 ABC LOCKSMITHS 9.70 AP-00218875 1/19/2005 ABC LOCKSMITHS 88.97 AP-00218876 1/19/2005 ABLAC 16.39 AP- 00218877 1/19/2005 ABLE FIRE PROTECTION 39.38 AP - 00218877 1/19/2005 ABLE FIRE PROTECTION 52.50 AP-00218878 1/19/2005 ABLETRONICS 28.55 AP- 00218880 1/19/2005 ADAMSON, RONALD 1,089.00 AP - 00218881 1/19/2005 ALL CITIES TOOLS 95.00 AP- 00218882 1/19/2005 ALLWELDING 250.00 AP: 00218882 1/19/2005 ALL WELDING 60.00 AP - 00218884 1/19/2005 AMERICAN CLASSIC SANITATION INC. 155.40 AP- 00218884 1/19/2005 AMERICAN CLASSIC SANITATION INC. 213.45 AP - 00218886 1/19/2005 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 176.00 AP - 00218886 1/19/2005 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 191.99 AP - 00218889 1/19/2005 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 298.47 AP - 00218889 1/19/2005 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 96.70 AP - 00218889 1/19/2005 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 495.00 AP - 00218889 1/19/2005 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 591.70 AP - 00218889 1/19/2005 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 120.34 AP - 00218889 1/19/2005 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 495.00 AP- 00218890 1/19/2005 ASSI SECURITY 425.00 AP-00218890 1/19/2005 ASSI SECURITY 105.00 AP-00218891 1/19/2005 ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS 15,872.00 AP - 00218892 1/19/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 87.94 AP - 00218892 1/19/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 727.31 AP - 00218892 1/19/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 42.82 AP - 00218892 1/19/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 72.73 AP - 00218892 1/19/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 100.21 AP - 00218892 1/19/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 69.28 AP - 00218892 1/19/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 61.70 AP-00218893 1/19/2005 BARNHARTINC 981,818.93 AP -00218893 1/19/2005 BARNHART INC -104,964.29 AP- 00218895 1/19/2005 BASSCO SPORTING GOODS 9L25 AP - 00218896 1/19/2005 BEI BETTER ENERGY IDEAS 361.50 AP - 00218897 1/19/2005 BOYLE ENGINEERING 1,272.70 AP-00218898 1/19/2005 BRODARTBOOKS 86.99 AP-00218898 1/19/2005 BRODARTBOOKS 291.90 AP-00218898 1/19/2005 BRODARTBOOKS 21.68 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 12 Current Date: 01/25/20C Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Tim~:,~s 10:31:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 1/12/2005 through 1/24/2005 Check No. Check Date yendor Name Amount AP - 00218901 1/19/2005 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STAT 1,372.19 AP - 00218901 1/19/2005 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STAT 93.78 AP - 00218901 1/19/2005 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STAT 93.65 AP - 00218901 1/19/2005 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STAT 24.23 AP - 00218901 1/19/2005 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STAT 11.88 AP - 00218901 1/19/2005 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STAT 128.26 AP - 00218901 1/19/2005 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STAT 498.64 AP - 00218901 1/19/2005 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STAT 140.67 AP - 00218901 1/19/2005 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STAT 490.34 AP - 00218901 1/19/2005 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STAT 170.04 AP - 00218901 1/19/2005 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STAT -1,882.00 AP - 00218902 1/19/2005 CALIFORNIA PARK & RECREATION SOCIETY 415.00 AP - 00218903 1/19/2005 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 46.81 AP - 00218903 1/19/2005 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 154.88 AP - 00218905 1/19/2005 CAMARENA, TAMI 62.00 AP - 00218906 1/19/2005 CBIZ ACCOUNTING TAX & ADVISORY OF ORAI 500.00 AP - 00218906 1/19/2005 CBIZ ACCOUNTING TAX & ADVISORY OF OR33 2,700.00 AP - 00218907 1/19/2005 CDW GOVERNIVIENT INC. 263.70 AP - 00218907 1/19/2005 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 9.99 AP-00218908 1/I9/2005 CHEMSEARCH 176.77 AP - 00218909 1/19/2005 CITY RENTALS 50.64 AP-00218910 1/19/2005 CLABBY, SANDRA 1,000.00 AP - 00218911 1/19/2005 CLASS SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS 4,677.00 AP-00218912 1/19/2005 CLAYTON, JANICE 53.49 AP - 00218914 1/19/2005 COAST RECREATION INC 126.22 AP - 00218914 1/19/2005 COAST RECREATION INC 500.00 AP - 00218914 1/19/2005 COAST RECREATION INC 300.00 AP- 00218914 1/19/2005 COAST RECREATION INC 51.08 AP - 00218914 1/19/2005 COAST RECREATION INC 500.00 AP - 00218914 1/19/2005 COAST RECREATION INC 500.00 AP - 00218915 1/19/2005 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 33.34 AP- 00218916 1/19/2005 COMP USA INC 365.99 AP- 00218916 1/19/2005 COMP USA INC 133.56 AP - 00218917 1/19/2005 CONCENTRA MEDICAL CENTERS 544.00 AP - 00218917 1/19/2005 CONCENTRA MEDICAL CENTERS 299.00 AP - 00218918 1/19/2005 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS ] 441.72 AP - 00218918 1/19/2005 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS ] 624.95 AP - 00218918 1/19/2005 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS ] 395.44 AP - 00218919 1/19/2005 COPP INDUSTRIAL MANUFACTURING INC. 384.98 AP- 00218920 1/19/2005 CORE MEDIA 70.00 AP - 00218922 1/19/2005 CREWS, SHIRLEY 67.38 AP - 00218923 1/19/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 167.08 AP - 00218923 1/19/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 70.48 AP - 00218923 1/19/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 117.28 AP - 00218923 1/19/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 379.38 AP - 00218923 1/19/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 113.03 AP - 00218923 1/19/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 20.18 AP - 002 ~8923 1/19/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 499.08 AP - 00218923 1/19/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 23.63 AP - 00218923 1/19/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 202.28 AP - 00218923 1/19/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 529.68 AP - 00218923 1/19/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 367.53 AP - 00218923 1/19/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 634.68 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 13 Current Date: 01/25/20¢ Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Tim~,~ 10:31:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 1/12/2005 ~hrough 1/24/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00218923 1/19/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 223.08 AP - 00218923 1/19/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 105.78 AP- 00218923 1/19/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 97.73 AP - 00218923 1/19/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 90.03 AP - 00218923 1/19/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 378.23 AP - 00218923 1/19/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 127.53 AP - 00218923 1/19/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 90.73 AP - 00218923 1/19/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 259.78 AP 00218923 1/19/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 165.48 AP 00218923 1/19/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 336.83 AP 00218923 1/19/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 252.98 AP 00218924 1/19/2005 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 685.00 AP 00218925 1/19/2005 DAPPER TIRE CO 828.28 AP 00218925 1/19/2005 DAPPER TIRE CO 817.32 AP- 00218925 1/19/2005 DAPPER TIRE CO 414.14 AP- 00218926 1/19/2005 DAWSON SURVEYING INC. 2,915.00 AP- 00218926 1/19/2005 DAWSON SURVEYING INC. 1,980.00 AP- 00218927 1/19/2005 DE LEISE, JENAE 519.24 AP - 00218928 1/19/2005 DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION 20,837.33 AP - 00218929 1/19/2005 DICK, ERIC 50.00 AP - 00218929 1/19/2005 DICK, ERIC 50.00 AP - 00218930 1/19/2005 DIETERICH INTERNATIONAL TRUCK 37.26 AP - 00218930 1/19/2005 DIETERICH INTERNATIONAL TRUCK 19.14 AP - 00218930 1/19/2005 DIETERICH INTERNATIONAL TRUCK 178.76 AP - 00218930 1/19/2005 DIETERICH INTERNATIONAL TRUCK 287.12 AP - 00218930 1/19/2005 DIETERICH INTERNATIONAL TRUCK 352.90 AP- 00218931 1/19/2005 DUKE, JASON 76.00 AP - 00218932 1/19/2005 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 35.47 AP - 00218932 1/19/2005 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 60.33 AP- 00218933 1/I9/2005 ECOLOGY CONSTRUCTION INC 46,010.90 AP - 00218933 1/19/2005 ECOLOGY CONSTRUCTION INC -4,601.09 AP - 00218934 1/19/2005 EMCOR SERVICE 1,000.00 AP - 00218934 1/19/2005 EMCOR SERVICE 7,325.00 AP - 00218935 1/19/2005 EMPIRE MOBILE HOME SERVICE 334.69 AP- 00218937 1/19/2005 ESPINO'S COP SHOP INC 135.00 AP - 00218938 1/19/2005 EXPERIAN 50.00 AP- 00218939 1/19/2005 EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY 126.16 AP- 00218940 1/19/2005 F S MOTOR SPORTS INC 120.00 AP - 00218941 1/19/2005 FENCE CRAFY OF UPLAND INC 38.79 AP - 00218942 1/19/2005 FILTER RECYCLING SERVICE INC 139.13 AP- 00218943 1/19/2005 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 414.00 AP - 00218943 1/19/2005 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 720.00 AP - 00218943 1/19/2005 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 340.00 AP - 00218944 1/19/2005 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 495.70 AP- 00218944 1/19/2005 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 149.01 AP - 00218944 1/19/2005 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 7.28 AP- 00218945 1/19/2005 FLEET GLASS 206.01 AP - 00218946 1/19/2005 GARNER, CATHLEEN 29.25 AP- 00218948 1/19/2005 GEENERGY RENTALS 1,881.25 AP- 00218949 1/19/2005 GENERATOR SERVICES CO 547.91 AP - 00218950 1/19/2005 GOLD'N WEST SURPLUS 1,327.00 AP- 00218951 1/19/2005 GRAINGER, V~W 701.82 AP- 00218951 1/19/2005 GRAINGER, WW ' 130.81 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 14 Current Date: 01/25/20¢ Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Ti~e:~/ 10:31:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 1/12/2005 through 1/24/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP-00218951 1/19/2005 GRAINGER, WW 828.29 AP- 00218951 1/19/2005 GRAiNGER, WW 763.21 AP- 00218951 1/19/2005 GRAINGER, WW 532.39 AP- 00218951 1/19/2005 GRAINGER WW 530.94 AP-00218951 1/19/2005 GRAINGER WW 532.39 AP - 00218951 1/19/2005 GRAINGER W~V 534.60 AP-00218951 1/19/2005 GRAINGER WW 202.92 AP- 00218951 1/19/2005 GRAINGER WW 954.15 AP-00218951 1/19/2005 GRAINGER WW 398.89 AP- 00218951 1/19/2005 GRAINGER WW 397.97 AP- 00218952 1/19/2005 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 219.81 AP- 00218953 1/19/2005 GWYNN, CHRIS 129.62 AP- 00218953 1/19/2005 GWYNN, CHRIS 1,536.00 AP- 00218954 1/19/2005 HAAKEREQUIPMENT CO 233.46 AP - 00218954 1/19/2005 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO 1,641.52 AP- 00218954 1/19/2005 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO 385.37 AP - 00218954 1/19/2005 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO 1,167.09 AP - 00218955 1/19/2005 HARALAMBOS BEVERAGE COMPANY 633.22 AP- 00218956 1/19/2005 HCS CUTLER STEEL CO 142.10 AP - 00218957 1/19/2005 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 102.08 AP - 00218957 1/19/2005 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 8.59 AP - 00218957 1/19/2005 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 84.49 AP - 00218957 1/19/2005 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 342.89 AP - 00218957 1/19/2005 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 60.58 AP - 00218958 1/19/2005 HOSE MAN INC 36.86 AP - 00218960 1/19/2005 HULS ENVIRONMENTAL MGT LLC 3,320.00 AP - 00218962 1/19/2005 IAFC MEMBERSHIP 225.00 AP - 00218963 1/19/2005 ICE-FX 4,202.25 AP - 00218964 1/19/2005 INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY COMPANY 154.54 AP - 00218965 1/19/2005 INLAND EMPIRE TOURS AND TRANSPORTATIC 575.75 AP - 00218965 1/19/2005 INLAND EMPIRE TOURS AND TRANSPORTATIC 1,023.50 AP - 00218967 1/19/2005 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 239.24 AP - 00218967 1/19/2005 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 229.28 AP - 00218967 1/19/2005 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 249.20 AP - 00218967 1/19/2005 INLAND VALLEY DALLY BULLETIN 174.50 AP - 00218967 1/19/2005 INLAND VALLEY DALLY BULLETIN 174.50 AP - 00218967 1/19/2005 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 179.48 AP - 00218967 1/19/2005 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 219.32 AP - 00218967 1/19/2005 INLAND VALLEY DALLY BULLETIN 224.30 AP - 00218968 1/19/2005 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 59.45 AP - 00218968 1/19/2005 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 205.39 AP - 00218968 1/19/2005 INTERSTATE BATTERIES -34.49 AP- 00218969 1/19/2005 J & D CLEANING SERVICES 850.00 AP - 00218970 1/19/2005 JOHN BLIJCKER 500.00 AP- 00218971 1/19/2005 JOHNSON, TERRY 76.00 AP - 00218972 1/19/2005 KALAL, TERRY 76.00 AP- 00218973 1/19/2005 KLAUS AND SONS 31,835.00 AP - 00218974 1/19/2005 KLEINFELDER INC 2,307.75 AP - 00218975 1/19/2005 LAGMAN, JENNY 250.00 AP - 00218977 1/19/2005 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS TECHNICAL COMMI 300.00 AP - 00218978 1/19/2005 LANIER, AMBER 62.00 AP- 00218980 1/19/2005 LAWSON, ROBERT 15.00 AP - 00218981 1/19/2005 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 35.00 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 15 Current Date: 01/25/20C Report:CK_AGENDA PEG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time~: ~ 10:31 :'~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 1/12/2005 through 1124/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00218981 1/19/2005 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 35.00 AP - 00218981 1/19/2005 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 35.00 AP- 00218981 1/19/2005 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 35.00 AP - 00218981 1/19/2005 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 35.00 AP - 00218981 1/19/2005 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 35.00 AP - 00218982 1/19/2005 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 150.00 AP - 00218983 1/19/2005 LEARNING RESOURCES NETWORK INC 295.00 AP - 00218985 1/19/2005 LOS ANGELES FREIGHTLINER 84.28 AP- 00218987 1/19/2005 LOWE'S COMPANIES INC. 168.00 AP- 00218987 1/19/2005 LOWE'S COMPANIES INC. 139.64 AP- 00218987 1/19/2005 LOWE'S COMPANIES INC. 36.34 AP- 00218987 1/19/2005 LOWE'S COMPANIES INC. 63.80 AP- 00218988 1/19/2005 MARKCHRIS INC 39.38 AP- 00218988 1/19/2005 MARKCHRIS INC 831.29 AP-00218989 1/19/2005 MARSHALL PLUMBING 187.25 AP-00218989 1/19/2005 MARSHALL PLUMBING 619.52 AP- 00218989 1/19/2005 MARSHALL PLUMBING -154.88 AP- 00218989 1/19/2005 MARSHALL PLUMBING -46.81 AP - 00218990 1/19/2005 MASON AND MASON 8,000.00 AP-00218991 1/t9/2005 MCWELLS, LORNA 81.00 AP - 00218992 1/19/2005 MEDTRONIC PHYSIO-CONTROL CORP. 5,096.33 AP - 00218993 1/19/2005 MIIAC ALARM COMPANY 96.00 AP - 00218994 1/19/2005 MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC & ELECTRONICS USA II 123.20 AP - 00218994 1/19/2005 MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC & ELECTRONICS USA It 1,540.00 AP - 00218994 1/19/2005 MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC & ELECTRONICS USA II -12.32 AP - 00218994 1/1912005 MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC & ELECTRONICS USA R -154.00 AP- 00218995 1/19/2005 MMASC 56.00 AP - 00218995 1/19/2005 MMASC 28.00 AP-00218995 1/19/2005 MMASC 28.00 AP - 00218996 1/19/2005 MOUNTAIN VIEW GLASS AND MIRROR 12.93 AP-00218997 1119/2005 MOUSER, CYNTHIA 70.59 AP- 00218998 1/19/2005 NAPA AUTO PARTS 214.85 AP - 00218998 1/19/2005 NAPA AUTO PARTS 0.95 AP- 00218998 1/19/2005 NAPA AUTO PARTS 315.85 AP - 00218998 1/19/2005 NAPA AUTO PARTS 67.75 AP- 00218998 1/19/2005 NAPA AUTO PARTS 185.11 AP - 00218998 1/19/2005 NAPA AUTO PARTS 77.78 AP- 00218998 1/19/2005 NAPA AUTOPARTS 25.57 AP- 00218998 1/19/2005 NAPA AUTO PARTS 66.57 AP- 00218998 1/19/2005 NAPA AUTO PARTS 176.18 AP- 00218998 1/19/2005 NAPA AUTOPARTS 158.64 AP - 00218998 1/19/2005 NAPA AUTO PARTS 58.01 AP - 00218998 1/19/2005 NAPA AUTO PARTS 226.62 AP- 00218998 1/19/2005 NAPA AUTO PARTS 225.21 AP- 00218998 1/19/2005 NAPA AUTO PARTS 33.93 AP - 00218998 1/19/2005 NAPA AUTO PARTS 63.36 AP - 00218998 1/19/2005 NAPA AUTO PARTS 158.68 AP- 00218998 1/19/2005 NAPA AUTO PARTS 196.51 AP - 00218998 1/19/2005 NAPA AUTO PARTS 7.52 AP - 00218998 1/19/2005 NAPA AUTO PARTS -7.96 AP- 00218999 1/19/2005 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS INC 143.52 AP - 002~9000 1/19/2005 NATIONAL DEFERRED 14,002.28 AP - 00219001 1/19/2005 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS 46.28 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 16 Current Date: 01/25/20E Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time,:, 10:3 l:~l /6 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 1/12/2005 through 1/24/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00219001 1/19/2005 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS 46.28 AP - 00219002 1/19/2005 NINYO AND MOORE GEOTECHNICAL 5,057.25 AP- 00219003 1/19/2005 NRPA 450.00 AP- 00219004 1/19/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 22.75 AP - 00219004 1/19/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 84.64 AP- 00219004 1/19/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 88.88 AP- 00219004 1/19/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 8.88 AP- 00219004 1/19/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 728.63 AP- 00219004 1/19/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 291.98 AP- 00219004 1/19/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 215.44 AP - 00219004 1/19/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 232.54 AP- 00219004 1/19/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 82.15 AP-00219004 1/19/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 35.75 AP - 00219004 1/19/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 79.40 AP- 00219004 1/19/2005 OFFICE DEPOT -15.95 AP- 00219004 1/19/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 32.68 AP- 00219004 1/19/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 33.93 AP- 00219004 1/19/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 46.77 AP- 00219004 1/19/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 178.39 AP - 00219004 1/19/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 79.40 AP - 00219004 1/19/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 106.67 AP - 00219004 1/19/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 95.25 AP- 00219006 1/19/2005 ORACLE CORP 868.59 AP - 00219007 1/19/2005 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 10.76 AP - 00219007 1/19/2005 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 31.75 AP - 00219007 1/19/2005 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 75.37 AP - 00219007 1/19/2005 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 127.00 AP - 00219007 1/19/2005 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 87.16 AP - 00219007 1/19/2005 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 71.21 AP - 00219007 1/19/2005 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 107.69 AP - 00219007 1/19/2005 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 142.03 AP - 00219007 1/19/2005 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 109.71 AP - 00219007 1/19/2005 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 68.26 AP - 00219007 1/19/2005 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 28.30 AP - 00219007 1/19/2005 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 23.68 AP - 00219007 1/19/2005 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 144.76 AP - 00219007 1/19/2005 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 5.68 AP - 00219007 1/19/2005 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 64.64 AP - 00219008 1/19/2005 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 275.00 AP - 00219008 1/19/2005 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 571.05 AP- 00219008 1/19/2005 ORKINPEST CONTROL 271.00 AP-00219009 1/19/2005 OWEN ELECTRIC 138.00 AP - 00219009 1/19/2005 OWEN ELECTRIC 89.13 AP-00219009 1/19/2005 OWEN ELECTRIC 74.76 AP - 00219009 1/19/2005 OWEN ELECTRIC 47.15 AP - 00219010 1/19/2005 PACIFICARE OF CALIFORNIA 56,657.31 AP - 00219011 1/19/2005 PACIFICARE OF CALIFORNIA 56,869.66 AP - 00219011 1/19/2005 PACIFICARE OF CALIFORNIA 1,990.08 AP- 00219012 1/19/2005 PATTON SALES CORP 94.70 AP- 00219015 1/19/2005 PHASE II SYSTEMS 3,500.00 AP- 00219016 1/19/2005 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 999.15 AP- 00219016 1/19/2005 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 11,853.77 AP - 00219017 1/19/2005 PORTER, DANIELLE 62.00 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 17 Current Date: 01/25/20C Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC -CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Times 7 10:31:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 1/12/2005 through 1/24/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00219018 1/19/2005 POUK AND STEINLE INC. 44,747.21 AP- 00219018 1/19/2005 POUK AND STEINLE INC. -2,686.32 AP- 00219018 1/19/2005 POUK AND STEINLE INC. 170,860.65 AP- 00219018 1/19/2005 POUK AND STEINLE INC. 26,863.20 AP- 00219018 1/19/2005 POUK AND STEINLE INC. -17,086.06 AP- 00219019 1/19/2005 PRAXA1R DISTRIBUTION INC 168.43 AP - 00219020 1/19/2005 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 6.8i AP- 00219021 1/19/2005 PROTECH TRANSMISSION SERVICES 9,221.62 AP - 00219024 1/19/2005 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CITY OF 700.00 AP- 00219025 1/19/2005 RCPFA 6,150.65 AP- 00219026 1/19/2005 RDOEQUIPMENT COMPANY 533.10 AP- 00219027 1/19/2005 RED WING SHOE STORE 137.37 AP - 00219029 1/19/2005 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 60.00 AP- 00219029 1/19/2005 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 60.00 AP- 00219029 1/19/2005 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 60.00 AP - 00219029 1/19/2005 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 86.00 AP- 00219029 1/19/2005 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 105.00 AP- 00219029 1/19/2005 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 60.00 AP- 00219029 1/19/2005 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 125.00 AP- 00219030 1/19/2005 ROTARY CORPORATION 34.52 AP-00219031 1/19/2005 RUPES HYDRAULICS 1,631.38 AP-00219031 1/19/2005 RUPES HYDRAULICS 4.68 AP - 00219032 1/19/2005 SALCEDO, BEVERLY 72.00 AP - 00219034 1/19/2005 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 71.60 AP - 00219035 1/19/2005 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT 1,139,408.00 AP - 00219035 1/19/2005 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT 24,281.00 AP - 00219035 1/19/2005 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIZFS DEPT 12,680.00 AP - 00219036 1/19/2005 SAN DIEGO NATIONAL BANK 104,964.29 AP - 00219037 1/19/2005 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 75.00 AP - 00219038 1/19/2005 SIGNET TESTING LABS/NC 6,857.25 AP - 00219038 1/19/2005 SIGNET TESTING LABS INC 4,908.50 AP- 00219038 1/19/2005 SIGNET TESTING LABS INC 4,615.50 AP - 00219042 1/19/2005 SMITH, EARLENE 62.00 AP - 00219043 1/19/2005 SO CAL1F GAS COMPANY 490.14 AP - 00219043 1/19/2005 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 438.74 AP - 00219043 1/19/2005 SO CAL1F GAS COMPANY 3,056.17 AP - 00219043 1/19/2005 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 663.96 AP - 00219043 1/19/2005 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 328.29 AP - 00219044 1/19/2005 SOUTHWESTERN BAG CO 4,065.63 AP - 00219046 1/19/2005 STANDARD DRYWALL INC 28,861.81 AP - 00219046 1/19/2005 STANDARD DRYVqALL INC 26,452.71 AP - 00219046 1/19/2005 STANDARD DRYWALL INC -2,886.18 AP - 00219046 1/19/2005 STANDARD DRYWALL INC -2,645.27 AP - 00219047 1/19/2005 STEVES TOWING AND TRANSPORT 75.00 AP - 00219048 1/19/2005 SUNRISE FORD 47.92 AP - 00219048 1/19/2005 SUNRISE FORD 31.40 AP - 00219048 1/19/2005 SUNRISE FORD 42.76 AP - 00219049 1/19/2005 SUNSHINE WINDOWS 2,790.00 AP- 00219049 1/19/2005 SUNSHINE WINDOWS 665.00 AP- 00219050 1/19/2005 T AND D INSTALLATIONS 267.98 AP - 00219050 1/19/2005 T AND D INSTALLATIONS 389.11 AP- 00219050 1/19/2005 T AND D INSTALLATIONS 319.99 AP- 00219050 1/19/2005 T AND D INSTALLATIONS 216.02 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 18 Current Date: 01/25/20C Report:CK_AGENDA PEG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:'~ 10:31:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 1/12/2005 through 1/24/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP- 00219050 1/19/2005 T AND D INSTALLATIONS 314.85 AP - 00219050 1/19/2005 T AND D INSTALLATIONS 570.63 AP- 00219050 1/19/2005 T AND D INSTALLATIONS 234.2I AP-00219051 1/19/2005 TANGRAMINTERIORS 15,468.01 AP- 00219052 1/19/2005 TAYLOR, TERI 65.00 AP - 00219053 1/19/2005 TBC RANCHO CUCAMONGA II INC 1,521.60 AP - 00219055 1/19/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 33,647.12 AP - 00219055 1/19/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 2,017.60 AP - 00219056 1/19/2005 UNDERGROUND TECHNOLOGY 1NC 785.65 AP - 00219057 1/19/2005 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 118.00 AP - 00219057 1/19/2005 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 706.58 AP - 00219057 1/19/2005 UNIFiRST UNIFORM SERVICE 122.63 AP - 00219057 1/19/2005 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 39.76 AP - 00219057 1/19/2005 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 24.56 AP - 00219057 1/19/2005 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 649.52 AP - 00219057 1/19/2005 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 24.56 AP- 00219057 1/19/2005 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 38.12 AP - 00219057 1/19/2005 UNIF1RST UNIFORM SERVICE 131.25 AP - 00219057 1/19/2005 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 24.56 AP - 00219057 1/19/2005 UNII41RST UNIFORM SERVICE 38.12 AP - 00219057 1/1912005 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 780.71 AP - 00219057 1/19/2005 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 180.03 AP - 00219057 1/19/2005 UNII~IRST UNIFORM SERVICE 665.96 AP - 00219057 1/19/2005 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 38.12 AP - 00219057 1/19/2005 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 24.56 AP - 00219057 1/19/2005 UNL~'IRST UNIFORM SERVICE 24.56 AP ~ 00219057 1/19/2005 UNII~IRST UNIY:ORM SERVICE 133.75 AP - 00219057 1/19/2005 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 38.12 AP - 00219057 1/19/2005 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 642.61 AP - 00219058 1/19/2005 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P, 2,782.47 AP - 00219058 1/19/2005 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P, 23,649.38 AP - 00219059 1/19/2005 UNITED GREEN MARK INC 1,549.66 AP - 00219060 1/19/2005 UNITED WAY 46.00 AP-00219061 1/19/2005 UPS 26.82 AP- 00219061 1/19/2005 LIPS 21.15 AP- 00219062 1/19/2005 VAN TECH 2,388.66 AP - 00219063 1/19/2005 VASILJ iNC 1,000.00 AP - 00219065 1/19/2005 VERIZON 29.48 AP-00219065 1/19/2005 VERIZON 21.61 AP - 00219065 1/19/2005 VERIZON 20.70 AP- 00219065 1/19/2005 VERIZON 30.76 AP - 00219065 1/19/2005 VERIZON 43.93 AP - 00219065 1/19/2005 VERIZON 29.64 AP-00219065 1/19/2005 VERIZON 48.62 AP-00219065 1/19/2005 VERIZON 465.02 AP - 00219065 1/19/2005 VERIZON 465.02 AP - 00219065 1/19/2005 VERIZON 205.77 AP-00219065 1/19/2005 VERIZON 42.61 AP- 00219065 1/19/2005 VERIZON 82.88 AP-00219065 1/19/2005 VERIZON 35.93 AP - 00219065 1/19/2005 VERIZON 57.69 AP- 00219065 1/19/2005 VERIZON 96.14 AP - 00219065 1/19/2005 VERIZON 29.64 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 19 Current Date: 01/25/20¢ Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:~ ~ 10:31:4 / 7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 1/12/2005 through 1/24/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP-00219065 1/19/2005 VERIZON 29.18 AP- 00219065 1/19/2005 VERIZON 59.33 AP- 00219065 1/19/2005 VERIZON 158.36 AP- 00219065 1/19/2005 VERIZON 27.83 AP-00219065 1/19/2005 VERIZON 27.82 AP- 00219065 1/19/2005 VERIZON 75.91 AP- 00219065 1/19/2005 VERIZON 40.00 AP-00219065 1/19/2005 VERIZON 47.14 AP- 00219065 1/19/2005 VERIZON 91.53 AP-00219065 1/19/2005 VERIZON 91.53 AP-00219065 1/19/2005 VERIZON 28.22 AP- 00219065 1/19/2005 VERIZON 29.18 AP-00219065 1/19/2005 VERIZON 91.53 AP-00219065 1/19/2005 VERIZON 91.53 AP- 00219065 1/19/2005 VERIZON 85.98 AP- 00219065 1/19/2005 VERIZON 92.72 AP - 00219065 1/19/2005 VERIZON 29.64 AP- 00219065 1/19/2005 VER1ZON 30.38 AP - 00219065 1/19/2005 VERIZON 28.46 AP-00219065 1/19/2005 VERIZON 390.87 AP-00219065 1/19/2005 VERIZON 29.83 AP-00219065 1/19/2005 VERIZON 91.55 AP- 00219065 1/19/2005 VERIZON 91.53 AP - 00219065 1/19/2005 VERIZON 29.64 AP - 00219065 1/19/2005 VERIZON 322.75 AP-00219065 1/19/2005 VERIZON 28.66 AP- 00219065 1/19/2005 VERIZON 91.53 AP - 00219065 1/19/2005 VERIZON 91.55 AP - 00219065 1/19/2005 VERIZON 29.64 AP-00219065 1/19/2005 VERIZON 91.55 AP-00219065 1/19/2005 VERIZON 91.53 AP- 00219065 1/19/2005 VERIZON 91.55 AP - 00219065 1/19/2005 VERIZON 91.53 AP- 00219065 1/19/2005 VERIZON 27.39 AP-00219065 1/19/2005 VERIZON 20.66 AP- 00219066 1/19/2005 VERIZON 1,169.90 AP - 00219067 1/19/2005 VIGILANCE, TERRENCE 400.00 AP - 00219068 1/19/2005 VIRTUAL PROJECT MANAGER INC 500.00 AP - 00219069 1/19/2005 VULCAN MATERIALS LA DISTR 1,002.90 AP - 00219069 1/19/2005 VULCAN MATERIALS LA DISTR 345.09 AP - 00219069 1/19/2005 VULCAN MATERIALS LA DISTR 54.77 AP - 00219069 1/19/2005 VULCAN MATERIALS LA DISTR 385.92 AP - 00219070 1/19/2005 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 88.57 AP - 00219070 1/19/2005 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 154.76 AP - 00219070 1/19/2005 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 9.41 AP - 00219070 1/19/2005 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 104.71 AP - 00219071 1/19/2005 WATER DOCTOR 330.00 AP- 00219072 1/19/2005 WAX1E SANITARY SUPPLY 419.88 AP- 00219072 1/19/2005 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 615.53 AP- 00219072 1/19/2005 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 719.39 AP - 00219072 1/1912005 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 1,129.08 AP - 00219072 1/19/2005 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 248.62 AP- 00219072 1/19/2005 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 518.12 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 20 Current Date: 01/25/20C Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 10:31:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 1/12/2005 through 1/24/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00219072 1/19/2005 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 510.92 AP - 00219072 i/19/2005 WAX]E SANITARY SUPPLY 125.50 AP- 00219072 1/19/2005 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 671.13 AP - 00219073 1/19/2005 WEST END MATERIAL SUPPLY 32.87 AP- 00219074 1/19/2005 WEST ROCK LLC 56,500.00 AP- 00219075 1/19/2005 WEST VALLEY MRFLLC 257.72 AP - 00219075 1/19/2005 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 153.00 AP - 00219075 1/19/2005 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 205.36 AP - 00219075 1/19/2005 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 228.14 AP - 00219075 1/19/2005 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 237.32 AP- 00219075 1/19/2005 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 249.90 AP - 00219075 1/19/2005 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 441.32 AP - 00219075 1/19/2005 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 356.66 AP - 00219075 1/19/2005 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 470.22 AP - 00219075 1/19/2005 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 84.62 AP - 00219075 1/19/2005 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 44.22 AP- 00219075 1/19/2005 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 52.14 AP - 00219075 1/19/2005 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 43.56 AP - 00219075 1/19/2005 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 29.48 AP - 00219075 1/19/2005 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 46.42 AP - 00219075 1/19/2005 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 39.38 AP - 00219075 111912005 WEST VALLEY IVIRF LLC 59.40 AP - 00219075 1/19/2005 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 184.28 AP - 00219075 1/19/2005 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 156.40 AP - 00219075 1/19/2005 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 99.00 AP - 00219075 1/19/2005 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 254.66 AP - 00219075 1/19/2005 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 298.52 AP - 00219075 1/19/2005 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 264.86 AP - 00219075 1/19/2005 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 42.88 AP - 00219075 1/19/2005 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 263.50 AP - 00219075 1/19/2005 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 267.58 AP - 00219075 1/19/2005 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 252.96 AP - 00219076 1/19/2005 WEST VALLEY SENIOR CONCERN 3,000.00 AP - 00219078 1/19/2005 ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY 92.15 AP - 00219078 1/19/2005 ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY 75.44 AP - 00219079 112012005 DRIVER ALLIANT SPECIAL EVENTS 181.80 AP - 00219079 1/20/2005 DRIVER ALLIANT SPECIAL EVENTS 148.97 AP - 00219079 1/20/2005 DRIVER ALLIANT SPECIAL EVENTS 148.97 AP - 00219079 1/20/2005 DRIVER ALLIANT SPECIAL EVENTS 181.80 AP - 00219079 1/20/2005 DRIVER ALLIANT SPECIAL EVENTS 148.97 AP- 00219081 1/20/2005 RIDGECREST, CITY OF 25.00 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 100.31 AP - 00219085 112412005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 81.60 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 81.28 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.00 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.00 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 96.67 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 72.44 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.34 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.50 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.73 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 116.39 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 28.62 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 21 Current Date: 01/25/20¢ Report:CK_AGENDA PEG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time~ ! 10:31:4 / CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 1/12/2005 through 1/24/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 82.63 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.50 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 82.72 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 101.11 AP- 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.50 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.00 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.00 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.00 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.50 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 57.82 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 49.49 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.50 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.39 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 60.63 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 130.09 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.11 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 66.97 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.00 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.50 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.50 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.34 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.50 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.00 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 153.59 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 127.51 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 31.58 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 150.29 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.95 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 37.08 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 118.35 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.00 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 34.98 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 5.18 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 59.38 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,074.99 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.86 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.84 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 39.25 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.00 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.50 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 3.64 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.00 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,266.47 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 75.56 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,418.16 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.23 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 133.21 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 80.04 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 147.64 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 29.72 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.60 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.99 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.84 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 22 Current Date: 01/25/20C Report:CK_AGENDA PEG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:~ .,n 10:31:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 1/12/2005 through 1/24/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00219085 1124/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 27.37 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.00 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.60 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 90.96 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 656.70 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.00 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.84 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.00 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 77.22 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.01 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.00 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.50 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.62 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 125.57 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 337.01 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 44.73 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.00 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.13 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 77.99 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.27 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.00 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.50 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.50 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.00 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 154.19 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 128.50 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 53.82 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.00 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 62.49 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 55.99 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 27.83 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.00 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.50 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 37.25 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.24 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.24 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.24 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.50 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.63 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.50 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.50 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.40 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.50 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.74 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.00 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 425.72 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 75.15 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.50 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.87 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 121.11 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.14 AP - 00219085 1/24/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 125.52 AP - 00219086 1/24/2005 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 43.16 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 23 Current Date: 01/25/20C Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time~:~ 10:31:~1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 1/12/2005 through 1/24/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00219086 1/24/2005 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 200.70 AP - 00219086 1/24/2005 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 4.00 AP - 00219086 1/24/2005 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 91.23 AP- 00219086 1/24/2005 VERIZON WIRELESS ~ LA 5,612.39 AP - 00219087 1/24/2005 UPS 5,000.00 Total for Check ID AP: 4,192,756.65 Total for Entity: 4,192,756.65 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 24 Current Date: 01/25/20C Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time.'_ ./10:31:4 R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ~NGINEEI~ING D I; PAl2 T l'i E N T Staff Report DATE: February 2, 2005 TO:. Mayor and members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Tasha Hunter, Public Service Tech I SUBJECt': APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DRC2004-00~.~.~ LOCATED AT 6944 EAST AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY WINSTAR DEVELOPMENT RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the subject agreement and secudty and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS DRC2004-00~.~., located at 6944 East Avenue was approved as a single-family residence. The Developer, Winstar Development is submitting an agreement and secudty to guarantee the construction of the improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance CASH: $3,300.00 Labor and Material CASH: $1,650.00 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office Respectfully submitted, Willia'm J. O Nell City Engineer WJO:TCH Vicinity Map City of Rancho Cucamonga  E DRC2004-00444 S RESOLUTION NO. 0.~ ~052 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR DRC2004-00444 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on February 2, 2005, by Winstar Development, as Developer, for the improvements of the public right-of-way generally located at 6944 East Avenue; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval have now been met by entry into an Improvement Agreement guaranteed by acceptable Improvement Security by Winstar Development, as developer. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest is hereby approved. [7 A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DA'rtl: February 2, 2005 TO:. Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT CASH DEPOSIT, MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR PARCEL MAP 16271, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF UTICA AVENUE, NORTH OF JERSEY BOULEVARD, SUBMITTED BY BAKKEN INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES, LLC RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Parcel Map 16271, accepting the subject agreement, improvement cash deposit and monumentation cash deposit, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No.3B and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 and authorizing the Mayor to sign said agreement and the City Clerk to cause said map to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tentative Parcel Map 16271, located on the west side of Utica Avenue, north of Jersey Boulevard in the General Industrial District (Subarea 6), was approved by the Planning Commission on March 24, 2004. This project is for a subdivision of 4 parcels on 2.2 acres of land. The Developer, Bakken Industrial Properties, .LLC, is submitting an agreement, improvement cash deposit and monumentation cash deposit to guarantee the construction of the public improvements in the following amounts: Public Improvements Faithful Performance Bond $28,000.00 Labor and Material Bond $14,000.00 Monumentation Cash Deposit $2,600.00 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT PARCEL MAP 16271 -BAKKEN INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES, LLC February 2, 2005 Page 2 Copies of the agreement and securities are available in the City Clerk's Office. A letter of approval has been received from Cucamonga Valley Water District. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms signed by the Developer are on file in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully submitted, William,.JJ. O'Neil City Er~ineer WJO:WV:dlw Attachments FOOTHILL BLVD. RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER DR. ARROw RTE ~ ~ TACOMA DR. z < )ERSET BLVD. ,.,J HUU OLT AVE. TOPEKA SANTA FE ACACIA ST. < ~th SL CITY OF ITEM: RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: ENGINEERING DIVISION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NO.16271, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT CASH DEPOSIT AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map 16271, submitted by Bakken Industrial Propedies, LLC, and consisting of a subdivision Of 2.2 acres of land into 4 parcels, located on the west side of Utica Avenue, north of Jersey Boulevard in the General Industrial Park (Subarea 6), was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on March 24, 2005; and WHEREAS, Parcel Map No. 16271 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on the Tentative Parcel Map; and WHEREAS, all the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met by posting the Improvement Cash Deposit and Monumentation Cash Deposit by Bakken Industrial Properties, LLC, as developer; and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement, Improvement Cash Deposit and Monumentation Cash Deposit submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and that said Parcel Map No.16271 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. RESOLUtiON NO. 05- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR PARCEL MAP 16271 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the 72 Act authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owner of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding the such provisions of the 72 Act related to the annexation of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XlIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XllID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 72 Act to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 72 Act and/or Article XlIID applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: This City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvements. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. Exhibit A To Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property To Be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: Bakken Industrial Properties, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company The legal descril~tion of the Property is: A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF PARCEL 8 OF PARCEL MAP 4594, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, RECORDED IN BOOK 47 OF' PARCEL MAPS, PAGES 2 AND 3, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. The above described parcels are shown on sheet A-2 attached herewith and by this reference made a part hereof. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~OaTi~ COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~ Exhibit B To Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2004/2005 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL) Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (LMD #3B) represents landscape sites throughout the Commercial/Industrial Maintenance District. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The various landscape sites that are maintained by this district consist of median islands, parkways, street trees, entry monuments, the landscaping within the Metrolink Station and 22.87 acres associated with the Adult Sports Park (not including the stadium, parking lots or the maintenance building). STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I (ARTERIAL STREETS) Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD #1)) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (COMMERCIAl/INDUSTRIAL) Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (SLD #6) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on commercial and industrial streets throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally, this area encompasses the industrial area of the City south of Foothill Boulevard. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. This sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on industrial or commercial streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on industrial or commercial streets generally south of Foothill Boulevard. Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2004/2005) For Project: PM 16271 Number of Lamps Street Lights 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L SLD # 1 2 ............ SLD # 6 ............... Community Trail Turf Non-Turf Trees Landscaping DGSF SF SF EA LMD # 3B ......... 8 *Existing items installed with original project Assessment Units by District Parcel Acres S 1 S 6 L 3B 1 0.50 1.00 0.50 0.50 2 0.46 0.92 0.46 0.46 3 0.50 1.00 0.50 0.50 4 0.49 0.98 0.49 0.49 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2004/2005 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAIJINDUSTRIAL): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $352.80 for the fiscal year 2004/05. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (Commercial/Industrial): Cf of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Comm/Ind Acre 2186.85 1.0 2186.85 $352.80 $771,520.68 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (PM 16271 ) is: Parcel 1 - 0.50 Acre x 1 A.U. Factor x $352.80 Rate Per A.U. -- $176.40 Annual Assessment Parcel 2 - 0.46 Acre x 1 A.U. Factor x $352.80 Rate Per A.U. = $162.29 Annual Assessment Parcel 3 - 0.50 Acre x 1 A.U. Factor x $352.80 Rate Per A.U. -- $176.40 Annual Assessment Parcel 4 - 0.49 Acre x I A.U. Factor x $352.80 Rate Per A.U. = $172.87 Annual Assessment STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I (ARTERIAL STREETS): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2004/05. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets): # of cf of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Family Parcel 21,151 1.00 21,151 $17.77 $375,853.27 Multi-Family Unit 8,540 1.00 8,540 $17.77 $151,755.80 Commercial Acre 2,380.36 2.00 4,760.72 $17.77 $84,597.99 TOTAL $612,207.06 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (PM 16271 ) is: Parcel 1 - 0.50 Acre x 2 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $17.77 Annual Assessment Parcel 2 - 0.46 Acre x 2 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $16.35 Annual Assessment Parcel 3 - 0.50 Acre x 2 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $17.77 Annual Assessment Parcel 4 - 0.49 Acre x 2 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $17.41 Annual Assessment C-1 PM 16271 STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $51.40 for the Fiscal Year 2004/05. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Comm/Ind Acre 2,065.67 1.00 2,090.72 $51.40 $107,463.01 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (PM 16271) is: Parcel I - 0.50 Acre x 1 A.U. Factor x $51.40 Rate Per A.U. -- $25.70 Annual Assessment Parcel 2 - 0.46 Acre x I A.U. Factor x $51.40 Rate Per A.U. = $23.64 Annual Assessment Parcel 3 - 0.50 Acre x 1 A.U. Factor x $51.40 Rate Per A.U. -- $25.70 Annual Assessment Parcel 4 - 0.49 Acre x 1 A.U. Factor x $51.40 Rate Per A.U. = $25.19 Annual Assessment c-2 R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGIIVEEI~INC D~iPAI~TNENT S Repor DA3E: February 2, 2005 TO:. Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Michael TenEyck, Administrative Resources Manager ~ SUBJECT: APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE ExECUTION OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT IN THE AMOUNT NOT TO ExCEED $17,500.00 TO AEF SYSTEMS CONSULTING, INC., TO ASSIST IN THE INSTALLATION MUNICIPAL UTILITY BILLING SOFTWARE, TO BE FUNDED FROM 17053035309 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council approve and authorize the execution of a Professional Services Agreement in the amount not to exceed $17,500.00 to AEF Systems Consulting, Inc., to assist in the installatio~ Municipal Utility Billing Software, to be funded from 17053035309 BACKGROUNDIANALYSlS: On August 31, 2001, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council authorized the creation and operation of a municipally owned utility for the purpose of providing vadous utility services. The formation and implementation of the City's electric utility has necessitated the need for a Utility Billing Software System. Therefore, after receiving direction from the Technical Review Group, the City issued a written Request for Proposals, with the assistance of AEF Systems Consulting, for Municipal Electric Utility Billing Software on June 17, 2004 and received responses from four firms. Staff and consultants reviewed all four firms responses, and on January 19, 2005, City Council awarded and au~orize the execution of the contract to the most responsive and responsible bidder, Advance Utility Systems. AEF Systems Consulting has been assisting in the staff in the RFP process and vendor selection. AEF Systems Consulting is familiar with the City's Information System Infrastructure and the needs of each of the departments. AEF is ideally qualified to assist the City in the Installation and configuration of the 0~iity Billing Software in order to facilitate and expedite the installation and training, Respectfully Submitted,. William J. O'Neil City Engineer R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A E~C.I~E~:I~ING DEPAI~'~ENT DA~E: February 2, 2005 TO:. Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Edca Darplee, Management Analyst I SIJB,F=CT: APPROVAL OF A FEE WAIVER AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended the City Council approve CO-~__~'-007,, which functions as an extension of Agreement CO-95-004; an agreement which currently waives development fees for capital projects undertaken by the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Cucamonga Valley Water District in each agency's respective service area. Agreement CO-95-004 was originally for a pedod of ten year~, expiring on February 15, 2005. The new agreement would extend this arrangement for another 10 years until February of 2015. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Agreement CO 95-004 entered into by the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Cucamonga Valley Water District on February 15, 1995, states that both the City and the Water District waive their applicable fees for one another on projects that are undertaken by each entity. This agreement was for a ten-year pedod that is soon coming to an end on February 15, 2005. Both the City and Cucamonga Valley Water District wish to extend this agreement for another ten-year pedod with City Council approval. As the City and the Water District continue to serve the residents of Rancho Cucamonga in the most cost-effective and efficient manner possible, the continuation of this agreement is a vital measure in achieving that end. As each entity relies on revenue generated from the same pool of taxpayers/ratepayers, placing fees on one another unnecessarily inflates each agency's costs and, thus, causes the community that both agencies serve to be relied upon for additional revenue to cover such costs. In this vein, in order to keep costs down and continue the practica of cost saving to the residents, staff recommends approval of the fee waiver agreement to continue the practice of waiving building plan check, building permit, and development fees. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer q! R A C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Staff Report DA[fi: February 2, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Cindy Hackett, Associate Engineer' Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Technician~ SUBJECT: ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED AND AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $111,309.00 TO THE APPARENT LOW BIDDER, DYE AND BROWNING CONSTRUCTION, INC., AND AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF A 10% CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $11,130.90 FOR THE BANYAN COMMUNITY TRAIL FROM SAPPHIRE STREET TO THE WEST CITY LIMIT, TO BE FUNDED FROM BEAUTIFICATION FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO. 11103035650/1463110-0 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council accept the bids received and award and authorize ~he execution of the contract in the amount of $111,309.00 to the apparent Iow bidder, Dye and Browning Construction, Inc., and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $11,130.90, for the Banyan Community Trail from Sapphire Street to the West City Limit, to be funded from Beautification funds, Account No. 11103035650/1463110-0. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on January 11,2005, for the subject project. The Engineer's estimate was $116,846.00. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements with any irregularities to be inconsequential. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents. The construction of this project is to construct a community trail, concrete header, drive approach, trail run-off deflector, miscellaneous grading and removals, adjusting existing utilities to new grade, installation of PVC 2-rail fence, and placement of decomposed 5/7_ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Accept Bids Received and Award Banyan Community Trail from Sapphire to West City Limit February 2, 2005 Page 2 granite. The contract documents call for twenty (20) working days to complete this construction. Respectfully submitted, Willigm J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:CH/RO:Is Attachment BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING JANUARY 11, 2005 APPARENTLOWBIDDER ENGINEERS COST Dye and Browning Banyan Community Trail from Sapphire Street to the West City Limit ESTIMATE Construction, lnc. Belaire-West Landscape, Inc. UNIT] UNIT] UNIT] NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT Clearing and grubbing (includes all removals, $12,000.00 1.~ 1 LS unclassified excavation fill, disposal and miscellaneous $12,000.00 $35,000.00 $35,000.00 $11,000.00] $11,000.00 grading) I Remove existing dirt and replace with 4-inch thick 2. 350 CY decomposed granite materials (D.G.) compacted 90% $70.00 $24,500.00 $60.00 $21,000.00 $150.00 $52,500.013 (including work on Beryl St. Trail, see Sheet 4) 3. 20 CY Mulch (Type 1 - fromground wood product) $90.00 $1,800.013 $80.00 $1,600.00 $100.00 $2,000.013 Construct drive approach, Type R-I, W=12' wide, L=6' 4. 4 EA long, Standard Drawing No. 101, include transition $1,500.00 $6,000.00 $500.00 $2,000.00 $3,475.00 $13,900.00 grading at local trail area Construct trail run-off deflector per detail on Sheet No. 5. 272 LF 1 (including ~vork on Beryl St. Trail, see Sheet 4) $25.00 $6,800.00 $22.75 $6,188.00 $40.00 $10,880.00 Install 3' PVC 2-rail fence per detail on Sheet 1 and 6. 1450 LF City Standard Drawing No. 1010-A, complete inplace $30.00 $43,500.00 $24.00 $34,800.00 $20.00 $29,000.00 7. 543 LF !Construct 8" concrete header, per City Standard Drawing No. 534 $22.00 $11,946.00 $14.50 $7,873.50 $15.00 $8,145.00 Construct 4" concrete apron, broom finish, see Sheet 4, 8. 25 SF $20.00 $500.00 $9.50 $237.513 Beryl St. Trail) $40.00 $1,000.00 9. 6 EA Install Trail Sign per Plan and Specification and Standard Drawing No. 401-B for post installation $300.00 $1,800.00 $185.00 $1,110.00 $500.00 $3,000.00 10. I LS Traffic Control $8,000.00 $8,000.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 TOTAL I $116,846.00 i $111,309.00 [ $132,425.00 Page 1 BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING JANUARY 11, 2005 Banyan Community Trail from Sapphire Street to the West City Limit 4-Con Engineering, Inc. JDC, Inc. UNITI UNITI NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT Clearing and grubbing (includes all removals, ] I 1., 1 LS unclassified excavation fill, disposal and miscellaneous $35,000.00 $35,000.00 $23,000.001 $23,000.00 grading) [ Remove existing dirt and replace with 4-inch thick 2. 350 CY decomposed granite materials (D.G.) compacted90% $59.00 $20,650.00 $65.00; $22,750.00 {including work on Beryl St. Trail, see Sheet 4) 3. 20 CY Mulch (Type 1 - from ground wood product) $100.00 $2,000.00 $50.00 $1,000.00 Construct drive approach, Type R-l, W=I2' wide, L:6' 4. 4 EA long, Standard DrawingNo. 101, include transition $3,500.00 $14,000.013 $1,500.00 $6,000.00 grading at local trail area Construct trail run-off deflector per detail on Sheet No. 5. 272 LF 1 (including work on Beryl St. Trail, see Sheet 4) $50.00 $13,600.00 $37.00 $10,064.00 .Install 3' PVC 2-rail fence per detail on Sheet 1 and 6. 1450 LF $22.00 $31,900.00 $29.00 $42,050.00 City Standard Drawing No. 1010-A, complete in place 7. 543 LF Construct 8" concrete header, per City Standard Drawing No. 534 $20.00 $10,860.00 $15.00 $8,145.00 Construct 4" concrete apron, broom finish, see Sheet 4 8. 25 SF Beryl St. Trail) $12.00i $300.00 $7.00 $175.00 9. 6 EA Install Trail Sign per Plan and Specification and Standard Drawing No. 401 ~B for post installation $300.00 $1,800.00 $150.00 $900.0~3 10. 1 LS Traffic Control $1,100.00 $1,100.00 $500.00 $500.00 ~ TOTAl [$131,210.00 I $114,584.00 Page 2 VICINITY MAP PROJECT SITE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BANYAN ST. COMMUNITY TRAIL (FROM SAPPHIRE ST. TO TI'IE ~EST CITY '1',1'1~1'IT) R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Staff Report DATE: February 2, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J, O'Neil, City Engineer BY.' Maria Perez, Associate Engineer Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED AND AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $957,375.20 TO THE APPARENT LOW BIDDER, GRAND PACIFIC CONTRACTORS, INC., AND AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF A 10% CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $95,737.52 FOR THE EMERGENCY EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS, NECESSARY IN THE WAKE OF THE GRAND PRIX FIRE, TO BE FUNDED FROM CAPITAL RESERVE FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO. 1025001- 5300 AND APPROPRIATE AN ADDITIONAL AMOUNT OF $350,000.00 TO ACCOUNT NO. 1025001-5300 FROM CAPITAL RESERVE FUND BALANCE RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $957,375.20 to the apparent Iow bidder, Grand Pacific Contractors, Inc., and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $95,737.52, for The Emergency Erosion Control Projects, Necessary in the Wake of the Grand Prix Fire, to be funded from Capital Reserve funds, Account No. 1025001-5300 and appropriate an additional amount of $350,000.00 to Account No. 1025001-5300 from Capital Reserve fund balance. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on January 25, 2005, for the subject project. The Engineer's estimate was $1,026,426.17. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements with any irregularities to be inconsequential. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Accept Bids and Award Contact- Eme~encyErosion Control Projects Februa~ 2,2005 Page 2 The scope of work to be performed on this project in general consists of minor grading and street repair, and the installation of several debds racks, corrugated metal pipe, ribbon gutter, inlet structures, concrete channel and rip-rap slope protection. The contract documents call for ninety (90) working days to complete this construction. Respectfu!ly submitted, William ,~. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:MP/RO:Is Attachment BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING JANUARY 18, 2005 Apparent Low Bidder Emergency Erosion Control Projects, Grand Pacific Contractors Necessary in the Wake of the Grand Prix Fire ENGINEERS ESTIMATE Inc. UNIT UNIT NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT 1. 1 LS Mobilization $50,000.00 $50,000.0£ $70,000.00 $70,000.00 2. 1 LS Temporar~ Traffic Control $20,000,00[ $20,000.0£ $25,000.00 $25,000.00 3. 1 LS SWPPP $20 000.001 $20,000.00 $16,000.00 $16,000.0(3 4. I LS Clearin,9 and Grubbin~l $100,000.00 $100,000.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 5. EA Salvage Existing K-rail to City Corporate Yard $60,00 $240.00 $200.001 $800.00 6. 49.' CY Unclassified Excavation $7.00 $3,451.00 $20.00! $9,860.00 7. 131 TON Stone Work for Erosion Control (1/4 tonI $23.50 $3,078.50 $75.00 $9,825.00 8. 111 SY Geotextiles for Erosion Control $4.25J $471.75 $4.50 $499.50 9. 57 CY Unclassified Excavation $7.001 $399.00 $20.00 $1,140.0£ 10. 11 CY Structural Excavation and Backfill $35.001 $385.00 $25.00 $275,0C 11 276 TON Stone Work for Erosion Control 11/4 ton) $23.50 $6,486.00 $75.00 $20,700.00 12 236 CY Geotextiles for Erosion Control $4.25 $1,003.0( $4.50 $1,062.00 13 21 CY ~liscellaneauos P.C.C. (Inlet lininc. I) $230.00 $4,830.0£ $225.00 $4,725.00 14. 1 LS 3oncrete Structure (Debds Rack, Type B, E4) $17,390.00 $17,390.0( $9,500.00 $9,500.0,~ 15. 62 CY Structural Excavation and Backfill $35.00 $2,170.0( $50.00 $3,100.00 16. ' 100 TON Stone Work for Erosion Control (1/4 ton) $23.50 $2,350.0¢ $75.00 $7,500.00 17. 110 SY Geotexfiles for Erosion Control $4.25 $467.50 $4.50 $495.00 18. 1 LS Concrete Struc ure (Debds Rack, Type A, E71 $36,660.00 $36,660.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 19. 161 CY Earthwork for Channels $25.001 $4,025.00 $30.00 $4,830.00 20. 370 TON Stone Work for Erosion Control (1/4 ton) $23.501 $8,695.00 $75.00 $27,750.00 21. 330 SY Geotexfiles for Erosion Control $4.25 $1,402.50 $4.50 $1,485.0( 22. 3 CY Miscellaneauos P.C.C. (Inlet lining) $230.00 $690.00 $225.00 j $675.0£ 23. 354 CY Structural Excavation and Backfill $35.00 $12,390.00 $25.00 $8,850.06 24. 403 TON Stone Work for Erosion Control 11/4 ton) $23.50 $9,470.50 $75.00 I $30,225.0(} 25. 487 SY Geotexfiles for Erosion Control $4.25 $2,069.75 $4.50 $2,191.50 26. LS Concrete Structure (Debris Rack, Type A, Eg) $253,090.00 $253.090.00 $73.581.00 $73,581.00 27. 53 CY Remove Structural Concrete $54.00 $2,862.0( $80.00 $4,240.0u 28 38 LF Remove Steel Pipe $23.00 $874.0( $100.00 $3,800.0~ 29 762 CY Structural Steel and Backfill $35.00 $26,670.0( $20.00 $15,240.00 30 21 CY Miscellaneauos P.C.C. (Inlet linin~l) $230.00 $4,830,0( $225.00 $4.725.00 31, 477 LF .3oncrete Structure (5' x 7' PCC Channel) $275.00J $131,175.0C $400.00 $190,800.00 32. 52 LF Concrete Structure (5' x 7' RCS) $300.00 $15,600.0C $767.00 J $39,884.00 33. 1 EA Concrete Structure (PCC Headwall, El0) $9,700.00 $9,700.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 34, 998 LF 6' Chain Link Pence $13.00 $12,974.0C $23.85 $23,802.30 35. 1 LS Regrade/Reestablish Basin Slopes per Plan, Complete 1/4 ~ $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 36. 5 CY Structural Excavation and Backfill $35.00[ $175.00 $150.00 $750.0C 37. 1 LS Concrete Structure (Debris Rack, Type B, El) $900.00! $900.00 $7,018.00 $7,018.00 38. 40 LF Remove Existing CMP $16.001 $640.00 $100.00 J $4,000.0C 39. 146;~ CY Earthwork for Channels $25.00j $36,700.00 $20.00 $29,360.00 40. 88C TON Stone Work for Erosion Control(I/4 ton) $23.501 $20,680,00 $75,00 j $86,000.00 41. 581 SY Geotextiles for Erosion Control $4.251 $2,469.25 $4.50 $2,614.5u 42. EA Concrete Structure (PCC Headwall, E13- East) $6,304.401 $6,304.40 $20,000.00 $20,000.0o 43. EA Concrete Structure (PCC Headwall, E13- Wast) $7,764.02J $7,764.0; $20,000.00 I $20,000.0u 44. 236 LF Install 72" Dia CMP $181,001 $42,716.0( $169.50 J $40,002.0C~ 45., 4 EA Salvage Existing K-rail to City Corporate Yard $60.00] $240.0( $200.00 I $800.00 46 275 CY Earthwork for Channels $25.001 $6,875.0C $20.00 $5,500.00 47 67 CY Structural Excavation and Backfill s35.0oj $2,345.0C $25,00 $1,675.00 48 120 TON ~Stone Work for Erosion Control (1/4 ton) $23.50r $2,820,0c $75.00 j $9,000.00 49. 126 cY Geotextiles for Erosion Control $4.25J $535.50 $4.50 I $567.00 50. 1 LS Concrete Structure (Debris Rack, Type A, E16) $41,690.00 $41,690.00 $25,836.40 I $25,836 40' 51. 118 CY Structural Excavation and Backfill $35.00 $4,130.00 $25,00 I $2,950.00J 52. 14C TON Stone Work for Erosion Control (1/4 ton) $23.50 $3,290.00 $75.00 $10,500.00 53. 170 SY Geotextiles for Erosion Control $4,25 $722.50 $4.50 $765.00 54. LS Concrete Structure (Debris Rack, Type A, E17) $69,530.00J $69,530.00 $36,477.00 $36,477.0C TOTAL I $1,026,426.17 J $957,375.2C. P~ge I L~ BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING JANUARY 18, 2005 Emergency Erosion Control Projects, Necessary in the Wake of the Grand Prix Fire 4-Con Engineering, Inc. SRD Engineering, Inc. UNIT ] UNIT NC QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT 1. 1 LS Mobilization $153,000.001 $153,000.0[ $72,000.00 $72,000.00 2. 1 LS i'emporar~ Traffic Contro~ $7,000~001 $7,000.0(: $49,000.00 $49,000.00 3. I LS SWPPP $9,000.001 $9,000.0(: $37,000.00 $37,000.00 4. 1 LS ~.leadn9 and Grubbin~ $80,000.001 $80,000.0(; $64,000.00 $64,000.00 5. 4 EA Salvage Existing K-rail to Cit~ Corporate Yard $500.001 $2,000.00 $440.001 $1,760.0(: 6. 493 CY Jnclassified Excavation $32.001 $15,776.00 $190.001 $93,670.0(: 7. 131 TON Stone Work for Erosion Control (1/4 tonI $41.00 $5,371.00 $41.00 $5,371.0fi 8. 111 SY !Geotextiles for Erosion Control $2.50 $277.50 $2.50 $277.50 9. 57 CY Unclassified Excavation $90.001 $5,130.00 $385.001 $21,945.00 10. 11 CY Structural Excavation and Backfil~ $200.001 $2,200.00 $825.00 $9,075.00 11. 276 TON Stone Work for Erosion Control (1/4 ton/ $45.001 $12,420.00 $41.00 $11,316.00 12. 236 CY Geotex01es for Erosion Control $2.501 $590,00 $2.501 $590~00 13. 21 CY Miscellaneauos P,C.C. (Inlet lining) $475.001 $9,975.0( $484.00 $10,164.00 14. 1 LS Concrete Structure (Debris Rack. Type B, E41 $9,000.00! $9,000.0( $23,800.00 $23.800.00 15. 62 CY Structural Excavation and Backfill $100.00[ $6,200.0( $352.001 $21,824.00 16. 100 TON Stone Work for Erosion Control (1/4 ton) $50.001 $5.000.0( $41.00 $4,100.00 17. 110 SY Geotextiles for Erosion Control $2.50 $275,0[ $2.50 $275.00 18. LS Concrete Structure (Debris Rack, Type A, ET) $145,000.00 $145,000.0[ $43,200.00 $43,200.00 19. 161 CY Earthwork for Channels $70.001 $11,270.0£ $330.00 $53,130.0(; 20. 37£ TON Stone Work for Erosion Control (1/4 tonI $45.00 $16,650.0(: $41.00 $15,170.0(: 21. 33(: SY Geotextiles for Erosion Control $2.50 $825.0(: $2.50 $825.0(: 22. 3 CY Miscellaneauos P.C.C. (Inlet lining) $1,000.001 $3,000.0(; $1,950.00 $5,850.0fi 23 354 CY Structural Excavation and Backfill $40.001 $14,160.00 $249.00 $88,146.00 24 403 TON Stone Work for Erosion Control 11/4 tonI .$41.001 $16,523.00 $41.00 $16,523.00 25 487 SY Geotextiles for Erosion Control $2.501 $1,217.50 $2.50 $1,217.50 26 1 LS Concrete Structure (Debds Rack, Ty~e A. E9) $67,000.001 $67,000.00 $167.000.00 $167,000.00 27. 53 CY Remove Structural Concrete $225.00 $11,925.00 $83.001 $4,399.00 28. 38 LF :{emove Steel Pipe $75.00 $2,850.00 $110.00 $4,180.00 29. 762 CY Structural Steel and Backfill $100.001 $76,200.00 $103.00 $78,486.00 30. 21 CY Miscellaneauos P.C.C. (Inlet lining) $550.00[ $11,550.00 $640.00 $13,440.00 31. 477 LF Concrete Structure (5' x 7' PCC Channel) $355.001 $169,335.00 $477.00 $227,529.00 32. 52 LF Concrete Structure (5' x 7' RCB) $600.001 $31,200.00 $1,270.001 $66,040.00 33. 1 EA Concrete Structure (PCC Headwall, El0) $16,500.00! $16,500.00 $32,600.00 $32,600.00 34. 998 LF 6' Chain Link Fence $23.001 $22,954.0( $21.00 $20,958.00 35. I LS Regrade/Reestablish Basin Slopes per Plan, Complete 1/4 T $200,000.001 $200,000.0( $157,000.00 $157,000.00 36. 5 CY Structural Excavation and Backfill $250.001 $1,250.0( $2,240.00 $11,200.00 37. I LS Concrete S rucure (Debr s Rack, Type B, El) $13,000.001 $13,000.0( $16,000.00 $16,000.0[ 38. 4[ LF Remove Existing CMP $100.001 $4.000.0[ $203.001 $8.120.0(; 39. 146~ CY Earthwork for Channels $45.001 $66,060.0[ $66.001 $96,888.0(; 40. 88(; TON Stone Work for Erosion Control (1/4 ton) $41.001 $36,080.0(; $41.001 $36,080.0(; 41. 581 SY Geotextiles for Erosion Control $2.501 $1,452.5(: $2.50 $1,452.5(; 42. EA Concrete Structure (PCC Headwall, E13- East) $20,000.00! $20,000.0(: $21,800.00 $21,800.00 43. EA Concrete Structure (PCC Headwall, E13- Wast) $22,000.001 $22,000.0(~ $21,800.00 $21,800.00 44. 236 LE Install 72" Dia CMP $410.001 $96.760.00 $366.00 $86,376.00 45. 4 EA Salvage Existing K-rai~ to Cit), Corporate Yard $500.00 $2,000.00 $440.001 $1,760.00 46 275 CY Earthwork for Channels $40.00 $11,000.00 $94.00 $25.850.00 47 67 CY Slructural Excavation and Backfill $90.001 $6.030.00 $220.00 $14.740.00 48 120 TON Stone Work for Erosion Control (1/4 ton) $45.001 $5,400.00 $41,0fi $4,920.00 49. 126 CY Geotextiles for Erosion Control $2.501 $315.00 $2.50 $315.00 50. 1 LS Concrete Structure (Debris Rack, Type A, E16) $40,000.001 $40,000.00 $45,000.00 $45,000.00 51. 118 CY Structural Excavation and Backfifl $50.001 $5,900.00 ' $297.001 $35,046.00 52. 14(: TON S~one Work for Erosion Control (1/4 ton) $41,001 $5,740,00 $41.00 $5.740.00 53. 170 SY Oeotextiles for Erosion Control $2.501 $425.00 $2.50 $425.00 54. LS Concrete Struc ute (Debt s Rack, Type A, E17) $59,000.001 $59,000.00 $60,000.00 $60,000.00 TOTAL i $1,537,786.5[ i $1,915,373.50 Page2 ~  PBOJECT: EMEBGENCY CiTY Of EeeSlOll cornel RANCHO I)OeAMONGA LOeAllON: VABIOOS NOBTB CiTY LIMITS ENGINEEBING DIVISION E]mlBn: VlClNIIYMAP the city of Rancho Cucamonga Staff Report DATE: February 2, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Lack lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Buller, City Planner BY: Larry Henderson, AICP, Principal Planner SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO EXECUTE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH RBF CONSULTING, NOT TO EXCEED $226,985, FOR THE PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (DRC2004-01048) FOR THE CARRARI RANCH PROJECT, IN RANCHO CUCAMONGA'S SPHERE OF INFLUENCE TO BE FUNDED FROM THE DEVELOPER DEPOSIT THROUGH ACCOUNT 10013145303. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council, through minute action, authorize the mayor to execute the Professional Services Agreement awarding the contract to RBF Consulting. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The proposed project referred to as "Carrad Ranch" a development on 381.19 acres will consist of approximately 90 to 100 single-family detached, executive-level homes to be constructed in one phase over a two to six-year period. The development of the property is anticipated to be limited to between 60 to 80 acres, therefore, only 17 to 21 percent of the site is to be used for development and the remainder retained as Open Space. It is anticipated that one builder will construct the dwelling units as semi-custom homes. The homes are expected to range in size from approximately 4,000 to 5,500 plus square feet. There will be a mix of one and two-story homes with at least a 2-car garage provided per home. Currently, the project site is designated as "Hillside Residential" and "Open Space" on the City's General Plan. No General Plan Amendment is required to accommodate the proposed project. In addition, there is no City zoning designation for the site since the property is currently located in an unincorporated area in San Bemardino County. A Development District Amendment will be required for pre-zoning purposes. An addendum to the City's Hillside Development Regulation will also be necessaryto accommodate the proposed project. In addition, the proposed project will require a Tentative Tract Review, Hillside Development Review, and approval of a Development Agreement. Following the City's approval of the proposed project, a request will be submitted to the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) to annex the Carrari Ranch project site into the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The developer, based on the proposed project, concurred with staff that an Environmental Impact Report should be prepared for the project. The developer submitted to the City a deposit of $267,041 to cover the costs associated with the successful bidder's environmental impact report preparation and processing. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT - RBA CONSULTING. February 2, 2005 Page 2 The staff began the selection process by distributing a Request for Qualifications/Request for Proposal (RFQ/RFP) to several environmental consulting firms in Southern California, from which three responded. Based on a review of their proposal for Scope of Services/Work with cost estimates and consultation with the Applicant, RBF Consulting has been selected for City Council consideration. The contract is for $226,985 and the remainder of the requested amount is a contingency. City Planner BB:LH/ge Attachments: Exhibit "A" Request For Proposal/Qualifications (RFP/RFQ) Exhibit "B" RBF Proposal Dated November 19, 2004 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT REQUEST FOFI PROPOSALS DATE: October 12, 2004 GOAL: The City of Rancho Cucamonga is seeking proposals to prepare and process an Environmental Impact Report for the Carrari Ranch Project. The update must include specific public participation opportunities, meet all legal requirements, and be user friendly with the most current computer access processes and methods available. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Prepare and process an Environmental Impact Report for the proposed project referred to herein as "Carrari Ranch." Currently, the project site is designated as "Hillside Residential" and "Open Space" on the City's General Plan. No General Plan Amendment is required to accommodate the proposed project. In addition, there is no City Zoning designation for the site since the property is currently located in unincorporated San Bernardino County. A Development District Amendment will be required for Pro-Zoning purposes. An addendum to the City's Hillside Development Regulation also will be necessary to accommodate the proposed project. In addition, the proposed project will require Tentative Tract Review, Hillside Development Review, and approval of a Development Agreement. Following City approval of the proposed project, a request will be submitted to the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) to annex the Carrari Ranch project site into the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Development on the 381.19 acres will consist of 91 single-family detached, executive-level homes to be constructed in one phase over a two to six-year period. It is anticipated that the dwelling units will be constructed by one builder as semi-custom homes. Homes are expected to range in size from approximately 4,000 to 5,500 plus square feet. There will be a mix of one and two-story homes with at least a two-car garage provided per home. The EIR shall be in conformance with State and City requirements and include the following basic components: Initial Study and Notice of Preparation Screen Check EIR Draft EIR Response to Comments Final EIR Mitigation Monitoring Program EIR Certification Process Public Hearings - Up to a total of four public hearings, two before the Planning Commission and two before the City Council. Findings for EIR Certification, including over-riding if needed. Program Administration Carrari Ranch Project DRC2004-01048 Request for Proposal October 12, 2004 Page 2 Meetings, Graphics, and Time Table Time Frame including present status. City Staff Meetings - Conducted at least once a month. Progress Reports - Submitted monthly. Intergovernmental Coordination Consultant shall be responsible for conducting all meetings; preparing agendas, public notices, and mailing lists; postage; and related activities. The completed EIR text, tables, charts, and maps must be user friendly and be in a compatible format to the City§s (Microsoft Word 97) word processing software. In addition to a minimum of fifty hard copies, the completed final update shall be made available on compact disks in a readable format. The EIR shall encompass the existing City boundaries, the current Sphere-of-Influence, and the Fire District boundaries. EIR maps shall be coordinated with the City's Planning Department and Geographic Information System (GIS) staff and be formatted in compliance with existing City software requirements (ARCVIEW). Carrari Ranch Project DRC2004-01048 Request for Proposal October 12, 2004 Page 3 SERVICES REQUIRED: Special studies shall include updating or providing new studies as needed and incorporating them into applicable sections of the EIR as follows: 1. Provide a Traffic Impact Analysis as necessary to satisfy the requirements of the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Program (CMP). 2. Update and clarify endangered or sensitive habitat or species mapping. 3. Hydrology and drainage study. 4. Comparison of City Hillside Grading Standards and proposed conceptual grading plan. 5. Wild Land Fire interface and fuel modification analysis. 6. Fire Response Time Analysis 7. Fiscal Impact analysis in conformance with LAFCO requirements. Provide separate cost evaluations in your proposal for each study listed above, AMOUNT BUDGETED: Applicant Deposit Required. CONTRACT TYPE: The City uses a Fixed Fee - Plus Actual Amount of Other Expenses, professional service contract, with a payment schedule based upon scheduled project component completion and City acceptance of the work. QUALIFICATIONS: Relevant professional qualifications, management qualifications, relevant project experience, logistical capabilities, financial qualifications, and special terms and conditions. Technical disciplines needed include: acoustical engineer, traffic engineer, urban/wild-land fire interface planner, fire facilities planner, botanist, and biologist. EVALUATION: Each proposal will be evaluated by the City based on the following criteria: 1. Conciseness and clarify. 2. Professional qualifications and capability of the consultant team that is assigned to the project. 3. Ability of the consultant firm to commit the personnel and time necessary to complete the project in the time frame outlined in the RFP response. 4. Experience with similar type projects. 5. Demonstration of a clear understanding of the project and the work to be performed. 6. Competitive cost. Carrari Ranch Project DRC2004-01048 Request for Proposal October 12, 2004 Page 4 The firms that most closely meet the Cites needs shall be invited to a presentation and evaluation interview. SUBMISSION DIRECTIONS: Firms interested in responding to this request must submit ten copies of their proposal to the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Planning Department, no later than 5:00 p.m. on Monday, November 20, 2004. Proposals received after the prescribed date and time will not be considered. Please address all proposals and inquires regarding this Request for Proposal to: Larry Henderson, AICP Principal Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 5'7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NOV £ · I~. n N S U LTl N G RECE!VE - PLANNING November 19, 2004 JN 10-104043 Mr. Larry Henderson, A.I.C.P., Principal Planner CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10500 Civic Center Drive California 91729 Rancho Cucamonga, Subject: Proposal for the Carrari Ranch (DRC2004-01048) Environmental Impact Report, City of Rancho Cucamonga Dear Mr. Henderson: The RBF Consulting team is pleased to submit this proposal to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the Carrad Ranch (DRC2004-01048) Environmental Impact Report (EIR). We understand that the project requires development of a 60.56-acre podion of the 381.19-acre Can-ad Ranch property, with construction of 91 single-family detached residences in one phase over a two to six-year pedod. The project site !s in an unincorporated area of San Bemardino County, within the City of Rancho Cucamonga s sphere of influence. A careful and diligent environmental review process is essential members of the and reviewing agencies to fully understand the potential to enable community effects resulting from buildout of the project. Based upon our review of available project information, a visit to the site (on October 29, 2004), as well as consultations with City Staff, we have developed a greater understanding of this project's particular issues. We believe that our background with similar projects and the experience of our team members are key attributes that we offer to the City for this project. In summary, RBF offers the folio:lng benefits for your consideration: *~o Experienced Project Manager: The RBF team, led by Glenn Lajoie, A.I.C.P., will work closely with City staff to expedite the CEQA review process and to resolve conflicts early. The RBF team includes in-house specialists for analyzing traffic, air · quality, noise, hydrology and water quality, fire response using a geographical information and the wildland fire interface and fuel modification. system (GIS), · Resumes of each team member are included in this proposal. Strong Subconsultant Team: We have assembled a highly skilled team of experts that comprises BonTerra Consulting for biological resources, (including endangered and sensitive species and habitat) CRM Tach for cultural resources, and Stanley R. Hoffman Associates for economic and fiscal analysis. Each of these subconsultants has a long history of working with RBF Consulting on EIR studies. o*** Legall Defensible Documentation' In today's litigious environment, it is · ~mperabve that every enwronmental report ~s legally defensible. Throughout RBF s 32 years of preparing environmental documentation, we have attained extensive experience in writing accurate, legally defensible environmental documents for all types of controversial projects· / 7%th ~ 14725 Alton Parkway, Irvine, CA 92618-2027 · PO Box 57057, Irvine. CA 92619-7057 · 949.4723505 Fax 9 Mr. Larry Henderson, AICP November 19, 2004 Page 2 Similar Residential Project Experience: RBF has prepared numerous CEQA compliance studies throughout California for residential development sites, many of which involve complex issues such as on-site resources and/or constraints, multiple interests, and numerous infrastructure improvement challenges. Representative projects include the Birch Hills EIR (Brea), the Colonies at San Antonio Specific Plan Amendment Program EIR (Upland), the Northem Foothills Implementation EIR (San Dimas) and the Dominguez Village EIR (Carson). Background with Hillside Development Projects: Our project background includes several hillside residential projects that have similar issues as identified for the Carrad Ranch project. Our most relevant project references are the North Village Specific Plan EIR (Mammoth Lakes), which entailed a mixed-use development plan on 64 acres; the Northern Foothills Implementation Program EIR (San Dimas), which involved 3,000 acres in the San Gabriel Mountain Foothills; and the Moon Camp EIR, for a 95-1ot residential subdivision and boat docking facilities along the north shore of Big Bear Lake (San Bernardino County). Each study included focused reviews of biological resources, drainage, and public safety and fire considerations. .:. Multidisciplinary Capabilities: RBF a unique in-house network of possesses over 800 professionals in disciplines, including planning and environmental services, transportation and traffic engineering; civil engineering (including grading, public works, water and wastewater and hydrology); mechanical, electrical and energy engineering; computer-aided design and drafting (CADD) and GIS services; and mapping, surveying, aerial photogrammetryand Media Services. These full-service consulting capabilities - all within one firm - enable us to coordinate our project work much more efficiently. Diverse Planning and Environmental Services: RBF's Planning Department offers an extensive background of services and expertise for a full spectrum of projects, including General Plans, Specific Plans, Environmental Impact Reports, Due Diligence Reports, Negative Declarations, urban design, entitlement processing, studies, analysis, assessments, and air quality NEPA review, noise view hazard modeling. Excellent Track Record of Meeting Schedules and Budgets: RBF has proven its ability to effectively complete environmental studies on time and within budget. We appreciate your consideration of RBF Consulting for the proposed Carrari Ranch EIR. We are available to begin the work program immediately, and welcome the opportunity to meet with you to discuss further our services and capabilities. Please do not hesitate to contact me at 949/855-3663 if you have any questions or would like additional information. Sincerely, Vice President Plannin~ and ~nvironmental Services PROPOSAL FOR CONSULTING SERVICES Carrari Ranch (DRC2004-01048) Environmental Impact Report Prepared for: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Submitted by: RBF CONSULTING November 19, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction and Understanding of the Project ................................................................................. 1 1.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Understanding of the Project ............................................................................................... 1 II. Scope of Work .................................................................................................................................. 5 1.0 Project Scoping ................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Project Kickoff and Project Characteristics ............................................................ 5 1.2 Research and Investigation .................................................................................... 5 1.3 Agency Consultation ............................................................................................... 5 1.4 Field Reconnaissance ............................................................................................ 5 1.5 Preparation of the Initial Study 5 1.6 Notice of Preparation .............................................................................................. 6 1.7 Scoping Meeting ..................................................................................................... 6 2.0 Preparation of Screencheck Draft EIR ................................................................................ 6 2.1 Introduction and Purpose ....................................................................................... 6 2.2 Executive Summary ................................................................................................ 7 2.3 Project Description ................................................................................................. 7 2.4 Cumulative Projects To Be Considered ................................................................. 7 2.5 Environmental Analysis .......................................................................................... 7 2.6 Growth Inducement .............................................................................................. 20 2.7 Cumulative Impacts .............................................................................................. 20 2.8 Alternatives to the Proposed Action ..................................................................... 20 2.9 Additional Sections ............................................................................................... 21 2.10 Graphic Exhibits ................................................................................................... 21 3.0 Draft EIR ............................................................................................................................ 22 3.1 Preliminary Draft EIR ............................................................................................ 22 3.2 Completion of the Draft EIR ................................................................................. 22 4.0 Final Environmental Impact Report ................................................................................... 22 4.1 Response to Comments 22 4.2 Final EIR ............................................................................................................... 23 4.3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ...................................................... 23 4.4 Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations ......................................... 24 5.0 Project Coordination and Meetings ................................................................................... 24 6.0 Optional Tasks ................................................................................................................... 25 6.1 Long-Range Traffic Analysis ................................................................................ 25 II1. Preliminary Project Schedule .......................................................................................................... 26 IV. Summary of Qualifications 27 V. References ..................................................................................................................................... 37 VI. Organizational Chart ....................................................................................................................... 38 VII. Project Team .................................................................................................................................. 39 VIII. Liability Insurance ........................................................................................................................... 44 IX. Statement of Financial Conditions .................................................................................................. 45 X. Budget ............................................................................................................................................ 46 I City of Rancho Cucamonga i ~ Proposal for Carrad Ranch EIR I I. INTRODUCTION & UNDERSTANDING OF THE PROJECT I 1.1 INTRODUCTION I RBF Consulting to an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) to assess proposes prepare potential impacts and identity mitigation measures for the proposed Carrad Ranch residential project in the City of Rancho Cucamonga Sphere of influence. The Draft EIR, I Final EIR, and associated work products will be prepared in accordance with the criteria, standards, and provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, Section 21000 et seq. of the State Public Resources Code; CEQA Guidelines (California Code of IRegulations, Sections 15000-15387); the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Guidelines; and the regulations, requirements, and procedures of any other responsible Public Agency with jurisdiction by law. RBF will, throughout the EIR, and where appropriate, relate the proposed Project to the general trends in Rancho Cucamonga and the I surrounding area. The proposed Scope of Services has been prepared in accordance with the task I requirements identified in the City's Request for Proposals. Each of the issues is approached thoroughly, to fully assess all potential impacts, establish thresholds of significance, and identify mitigation measures. RBF is the lead firm for this work program I and will provide services from our corporate headquarters in Irvine. Our familiarity with this project's particular issues, coupled with our prior environmental review experience in residential development throughout southern California, are key assets thatwe offer to the I C ity of Rancho Cucamonga to complete environmental clearance for the project. 1.2 UNDERSTANDING OF THE PROJECT I The City of Rancho Cucamonga is seeking to retain a consultant to prepare an EIR for the proposed Carrari Ranch project located on approximately 381 gross acres of undeveloped i land at the foothills of the San Gabdel Mountains, north of the city limits of Rancho Cucamonga and within the City's Sphere of Influence. The site is undeveloped and consists of hillsides, canyons, and ravines. Gradients of ridgelines and canyons range from approximately 4 percent to more than 20 percent. Adjacent land uses include the San I Bemardino National Forest to the north and an existing residential neighborhood to the south. I The project proposes to develop 91 single-family detached residences within a 60.56-acre area, to be constructed in one phase overa two-to six-year period. Homes are expected to range in size from approximately 4,000 to 5,500+ square feet, with a mix of one- and two- I story homes. The project site would be mass-graded in a series of tiers to maximize views of the surrounding hillsides and the City below and to accommodate the necessary streets and individual pads. ! ! I JN10-104043 olo November19,2004 ~ I  City of Rancho Cucamonga i Proposal for Carrari Ranch EIR . I Although no General Plan Amendment will be required, a Development District Amendment will be required for Pre-Zoning purposes. In addition to the other approvals required for the project (i.e., Tentative Tract Review, Hillside Development Review, and Development Agreement), a request will be submitted to the Local Agency Formation Commission I (LAFCO) to annex the Can'ad Ranch project site into the City of Rancho Cucamonga. With continued growth and development in the project vicinity, several environmental issues I require detailed review, given the hillside location of the property and the need to extend infrastructure and roadways to serve the site. Among the most predominant issues is public safety impacts from wildland fires. The project site's location adjacent to a high fire danger I area will require a focused review of fire protection response timing and fuel modification requirements. Another issue of concern is the potential for geological impacts (Cucamonga fault and the Demons Canyon fault), which bisect the property and possible landslide i features and sur[icial slope areas onsite. Other issues include potential flooding and drainage impacts, potential sensitive biological resources and cultural resources on the site, traffic generation and distribution on local roadways, and the overall consistency of the project with the goals and objectives set forth in the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. I The project's scale and geographical location require consideration of environmental, planning, and design criteria. Careful consideration must be given to on-site resources and I the compatibility of the project with the surrounding community. RBF will serve as an extension of City staff to ensure that the entire CEQA process is comprehensive, which will include consideration of recent CEQA legislation and requirements of reviewing agencies. i The RBF project management team led by Mr. Glenn Lajoie will provide regular and consistent communications and updates to staffon the progression of the work program and status of the environmental analyses. I project will involve a detailed scoping process to review issues, constraints, The initiation and project opportunities. RBF will embark on an agency consultation process and monitor in a public scoping session, to ascertain key community concerns and inform the public as I to the purpose of the CEQA review and determination process. The Initial Study will be circulated with the Notice of Preparation for 30-day review. Comments received dudng the review period will be evaluated as part cf preparation of the Draft EIR. I The Draft EIR will begin with the Introduction and Purpose, Executive Summary, and Project Description sections. The Environmental Analysis section will evaluate the necessary i information with respect to the existing conditions, the potential adverse effects of Project implementation (both individual and cumulative), and measures to mitigate such effects. Environmental issues raised during the scoping process i.e., (Notice of Preparation i responses, Public Scoping Meeting; and any other relevant and valid informative sources) will also be evaluated. The Environmental Analysis section will thoroughly discuss the existing conditions for each environmental issue area, identify short-term and long-term environmental impacts associated with the Project, and determine their levels of i significance. Feasible mitigation measures will be recommended to reduce the significance of impacts and to identify any unavoidable adverse impacts that are significant even after mitigation. The environmental documentation will assist in identifying constraints, I modifications and improvements that may be incorporated into the land planning process. ! I dS City of Rancho Cucamonga ~ Proposal for Carrari Ranch EIR The EIR will include analysis for the following environmental issue areas: · :o Land Use and Relevant Planning: Conformance with existing.City and regional policies and overall compatibility of the project with existing and/or planned uses in the vicinity of the site will be studied. · ~o Economics/Fiscah A fiscal impact analysis will be prepared in conformance with LAFCO requirements. The repod will be included as an EIR appendix and its economic information will be incorporated into applicable issue analyses in the EIR. Aesthetics Light, and Glare: Potential view obstructions, project design, lighting, glare, and overall affects of the project on the surrounding area will be analyzed. Traffic and Circulation: The EIR will address on-site and off-site traffic impacts, tuming movements, circulation modifications, and improvements of nearby roadways and regional facilities, in accordance with the requirements of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the San Bemardino Associated Governments (SANBAG). Air Quality: Air emissions resulting from project construction and buildout will be studied. Emissions associated with project vehicular tdps will be evaluated in accordance with the South Coast Air Quality Management District's modeling criteria. · :o Noise: Project noise impacts on sensitive areas near the site will be addressed. Impacts along local roadways and on sensitive receptors in the vicinity will be analyzed. · ;* Resources: Because the site contains dense vegetation and Biological several natural intermittent drainages, the analysis will focus on impacts on sensitive habitats and on endangered, threatened, and/or rere species, especially those that are associated with dparian habitat or are part of a wildlife migration corridor. ¢* Cultural Resources: This section will consider impacts on historical, archeological, and paleontological resources that may occur on-site. Public Safety: In considering impacts resulting from potential wildland fires, this section will incorporate the analysis and conclusions of the Fire Response Time Analysis and Wildland Fire Inter[ace and Fuel Modification Analysis prepared for the project. Geology, Seismicity, and Soils: The RBF team will document on-site soil conditions, seismicity, land stability, and grading effects associated with the project. A primary focus area will be the effects associated with the two faults that bisect the site. ¢o Hydrology, Water Quality, and Drainage: The RBF team will evaluate on- and off-site drainage effects and water quality impacts. JN 10-104043 .3. November 19, 2004 ~, ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga ~ Proposal for Carrari Ranch EIR . *:* Services and Utilities: The ability of existing public services and infrastructure to support the proposed development and increased demand will be analyzed. Growth-Inducing Impacts: The potential for the project to induce growth will be evaluated in accordance with local and regional projections. Cumulative Impacts: A comprehensive review of the Project's cumulative impacts (in combination with impacts of other planned projects) will be conducted. ***o Alternatives: The analysis will evaluate possible impacts and will compare impacts for each alternative with those of the proposed Project. To assist the reader in evaluating impacts, they will be presented in a matdx (table). The RBF project team will be an integral component in the City's Project review process and will participate in meetings with staff and public hearings, as required by the City. RBF will complete the environmental review process, respond to all comments received dudng the 45-day review period, and prepare the findings of significance and mitigation monitoring program (as directed by staff). The environmental review process will culminate in the presentation of pertinent Project impact information and findings to the City decision makers for determination and CEQA certification. City of Rancho Cucamonga ¢~ Proposal for Can'aH Ranch EIR . II. SCOPE OF WORK The following Scope of Work has been prepared pursuant to the information contained in the October 12, 2004, Request for Proposals and in subsequent information received from the City. The cost estimate, which is itemized according to task and issue, is in Section X (Budget). 1.0 PROJECT SCOPING 1.1 PROJECT KICKOFF AND PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS Our work program will be initiated with the kickoff meeting discussion which will define the parameters of the analysis, scheduling, and understanding of the project. A critical initial step will be to accurately define the project description. Based upon site plan information and supporting data such as landscape plans, elevations, renderings, and all other project details, RBF will draft a preliminary project description for review and approval by staff. 1.2 RESEARCH AND INVESTIGATION RBF will obtain and review available data for the project area as well as policy documentation from the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bemardino, state and federal agencies, the Southem Califomia Association of Governments, and all other agencies which may be affected by the Project. This information, along with environmental data and information available from the City and other nearby jurisdictions, will become part of the foundation of the EIR and will be reviewed and incorporated into the analysis, as deemed appropriate. 1.3 AGENCY CONSULTATION As indicated in Section 15083 of CEQA, many public agencies have found that early consultation solves many potential conflicts that could adse in more sedous forms later in the review process. Although the Notice of Preparation and Public Scoping session meeting provide that opportunity, RBF will conduct additional discussions with local, state, and federal agencies that will assist in the early stages of the analysis and issue delineation. This scoping is an effective way to bring together and resolve the concerns of affected federal, state, and local agencies as well as the local community. 1.4 FIELD RECONNAISSANCE As a part of the early scoping for the project, the RBF Team will conduct a field study of the site, review existing land use and environmental conditions and conduct a detailed photographic recording of on-site and surrounding uses. '1.5 PREPARATION OF THE INITIAL STUDY RBF will prepare the Initial Study for the proposed Project. The Initial Study will descdbe the Project, the Project location, and a description of the environmental setting of the proposed Project site. The main body of the document will consist of a JN 10-104043 -5- November 19, 2004 ~__~ ~3' City of Rancho Cucamonga Proposal for Carrari Ranch EIR City-approved environmental checklist and an accompanying environmental analysis. The Project will be analyzed for its potential to create significant environmental impacts in the areas specified on the City's approved environmental checklist. The Initial Study will also include mandatory findings of significance regarding impacts upon biological resources, long-term versus short-term goals, cumulative impacts, and direct and indirect impacts upon human beings. 1.6 NOTICE OF PREPARATION RBF will prepare, distribute, and file the Notice of Preparation (NOP) for the EIR. A Draft NOP will be prepared and forwarded to City Staff for review and comment. RBF will then finalize the NOP for distribution. The distribution will be based on a City-approved distribution list of affected agencies parties, and interested to be prepared by RBF in conjunction with City staff. This task includes certified mailing to a maximum of fifty addresses. During the preparation of the EIR, RBF will evaluate comments received in response to the NOP. Deliverables: · Fifty (50) copies of the Notice of Preparation (NOP) · Fifty (50) bound copies of the Initial Study (iS) · One (1) camera ready unbound copy each of the NOP and IS · One (1) electronic copy (on a CD-ROM) of the NOP and IS Note: All project-related deliverables will be in a compatible format to the City's word I processing software (Microsoft 97). Word t .7 SCOPING MEETING I A public scoping meeting, which can also involve federal, state or other local agencies, will be set up as a brief project overview presentation, so that the I community can gain an understanding of the proposed project and make comments based upon accurate knowledge of the proposed project. The Scoping Meeting will emphasize the review process and will be presented so that the community can gain I a greater understanding of the proposed project, as well as the intent and requirements of CEQA. RBF will provide handouts and up to two presentation-size graphics to supplement the discussion. Following the presentation, the meeting will be devoted to public participation, questions and comments. Written comment forms I will be provided for this purpose, and these comments, along comments, with verbal will become a part of the administrative record. I 2.0 PREPARATION SCREENCHECK DRAFT EIR OF 2.1 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE I The Introduction will cite the provisions of CEQA and the City of Rancho Cucamonga CEQA implementation procedures tor which the proposed project is subject. This I section will identify the purpose of the study and statutory authority, document I JN 10-104043 .6. November 19, 2004 ~ ? City of Rancho Cucamonga Proposal for Carrari Ranch EIR . scoping procedures, summarize the EIR format, list the responsible and trustee agencies, and specify documents incorporated by reference. 2.2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY RBF will provide an Executive Summary for the EIR, including a project summary, an overview of project impacts, mitigation and levels of significance after mitigation, a summary of project alternatives, and the areas of controversy and issues to be resolved. The Environmental Summary will be presented in a columnar format. 2.3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Project Description section of the EI R will descdbe the Project in detail: location, background and history, discretionary actions, characteristics, goals and objectives, phasing, agreements, and requested permits and approvals, based on available information. This section will summarize the local environmental setting and include exhibits depicting the regional and site vicinities, as an aedal photograph of the site. 2.4 CUMULATIVE PROJECTS TO BE CONSIDERED In accordance with Section 15130 of CEQA, this section provides a detailed listing of cumulative projects and actions under consideration for the analysis. As stated in Task 2.7, Cumulative Impacts, the likelihood of occurrence and level of sevedty will be studied. The purpose of this section is to list and describe projects (past, present and anticipated in the reasonably foreseeable future), even if those projects are outside of the jurisdiction of Rancho Cucamonga. The potential for impacts and levels of significance are contingent upon the radius or area of interaction with the proposed development. RBF will consult with City staff and other applicable local jurisdictions to define the appropriate study area for the cumulative impacts analysis, as described in Task 2.7. 2.5 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS RBF will evaluate the necessary information with respect to the existing conditions, the potential adverse effects of Project implementation (both individual and cumulative), and measures to mitigate such effects. Environmental issues raised dudng the scoping process (NOP responses, Public Scoping Meeting and anyother relevant and valid informative sources) will also be evaluated. The analyses will be based upon all available data, results from additional research, and an assessment of existing technical data. These analyses will be performed by qualified environmental analysts, CEQA experts, and planners at RBF. The Environmental Analysis section of the EIR will thoroughly discuss the existing conditions for each environmental issue area, identify short-term and long-term environmental impacts associated with the project, and determine their levels of significance. Feasible mitigation measures will be recommended to reduce the significance of impacts and to identify areas of unavoidable adverse impacts that are significant even after mitigation. The environmental documentation will assist in identifying constraints, modifications and improvements that may be incorporated into the land planning process. · 7o November 19, 2004 ~ {~ City of Rancho Cucamonga Proposal for Can'aH Ranch EIR . This section will analyze the following environmental issue areas: A. Land Use and Relevant Planning As stated in the City's RFP, the project site is located within the City's Sphere of Influence and is proposed to be annexed into the City. The project site is designated as "Hillside Residential" and "Open Space" in the City's General Plan. No General Plan Amendment is required to accommodate the proposed project. Additionally, there is no City Zoning designation for the site, since the property is currently located in unincorporated San Bernardino County. Approval of a Development District Amendment, Tentative Tract Map Review, Hillside Development Review, and Development Agreement will be required. RBF will analyze the relationship of the proposed project and associated entitlements to all applicable planning policies Applicable City and ordinances. policy documents are anticipated to include the General Plan and Development Code. The regional planning review will include consistency with the SCAG Regional Comprehensive Plan and Guide Policies. RBF will evaluate the compatibility of the proposed uses in comparison to the surrounding uses. Proposed development and design standards will also be reviewed. Mitigation measures will be identified to reduce the significance of potential impacts. B. Economics/Fiscal A Fiscal Impact Analysis will be prepared by Stanley R. Hoffman Associates, inc., in conformance with LAFCO requirements. This report will present the recurring public revenues and costs of the proposed Project upon annexation by the City. The will be referenced in the EIR in sections. discussion of economic impacts applicable The scope of the Fiscal Impact Analysis includes the following: Proiect Information. A detailed project description will be prepared, based on information provided by the project team. This will include lot and unit square footages, acreages, lane-miles of private and public roads, signalization, drainage, parks, open space, easements, trails, landscaping and any other relevant public facilities, such as off-site mitigation requirements. Copies of the property parcel records and estimated product valuation ranges will be provided by the City and/or Project Applicant. In addition, household income ranges of home buyers in the development will be estimated and used in estimating any off-site sales tax from household expenditures potentially captured in the City. .Fiscal Factors. The preparation of fiscal assumptions on be based recent annexation fiscal work in the City by Stanley R. Hoffman Associates, plus review and analysis of the current budget for the City. Revenue assumptions will include property tax, property transfer tax, motor vehicle in-lieu taxes, gasoline taxes, franchise fees, fines and forfeitures, library revenues, and other fees and charges. Also, potential off-site sales tax will be estimated based on household incomes and a reasonable City capture estimate. Cost factors will be prepared for City-provided services such as police protection, general government, library, parks and recreation, fire protection, road maintenance, and other public services as identified. Stanley R. Hoffman Associates will work closely with the project team to identify o8o November 19, 2004 ,~ !  City of Rancho Cucamonga i ~ Proposal for Carrari Ranch EIR those facilities and costs covered by e proposed Landscape Maintenance District I and/or Homeowners' Association. FiscalAnalysis. The fiscal analysis will present the recurring public revenues and I costs to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and its subsidiary fire distdct upon assumed annexation. Stanley R. Hoffman Associates will use the estimated property tax transfer calculation by LAFCO in our analysis of future property taxes to accrue to I the City. The results will be presented at project build-out for the General Fund and the subsidiary fire district. The potential implications of phasing over a two-to six- year period will be discussed qualitatively. I Documentation. The analysis will present the revenue and cost estimation methodology, development assumptions and estimated fiscal impacts on the City of Rancho Cucamonga of the proposed project. A draft report will be reviewed with the I team and staff and revised A final will then be project City accordingly. report submitted. Any response to public comments after submittal of the final report will be on a time and materials basis. I The Fiscal Impact Analysis will be incorporated into the EIR in accordance with the CEQA Guidelines. C. Aesthetics, Light, and Glare i The issue of aesthetics is in some ways a subjective consideration. What is visually offensive to some may not be of great concern to others. Nevertheless, the issue does require review, based upon the cdteda set forth in Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines. The evaluation for this project will be based upon a review of plan I information, on-site reconnaissance, and provided by Applicant. information the RBF will characterize the existing aesthetic environment and visual resources, I including a discussion of views within the site and views from surrounding areas to the site, particularly from the adjacent uses. Project construction impacts will be addressed based on the site's aesthetic changes visible from surrounding roadways I and locations. RBF will evaluate available architectural and design standards for the Project. Mitigation measures such as perimeter landscaping, building design, articulation, screening, and setbacks may be recommended to reduce the I significance of potential visual impacts. Color site photographs will be provided which will show on-site and surrounding views. This section will analyze potential view impairments (if any) to adjacent uses as a result of Project implementation. The compatibility of the Project's architectural features, height and building materials I with the on-site uses and the surrounding area will be reviewed. RBF will also address potentially significant impacts generated by the introduction of I light and glare from of the proposed Project. This analysis will discuss light and glare impacts (from streetlights, vehicle headlights, building lights, etc.) on neighboring sensitive uses. RBF will review and incorporate existing City policies I and guidelines regarding light and glare for inclusion within the EIR. RBF will recommend mitigation measures to reduce potential aesthetic and light and glare impacts to the maximum extent possible. ! I JN 10-104043 .9- November 19, 2004 City of Rancho Cucamonga ~ Proposal for Carrari Ranch EIR . D. Traffic and Circulation RBF Consulting will prepare a Traffic Impact Analysis for the proposed project. The scope of work is based on discussions with Mr. John Gillespie, of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. It was recommended that a near-term only analysis be conducted. A long-range analysis is not included, under the assumption that the proposed project would not require a zone change and/or General Plan Amendment. Upon review of the work program, should it be determined that a long-range analysis is also required, those services can be provided in accordance with optional Task 6.1. The traffic analysis will assess the impacts of the proposed project by analyzing forecast project trip generation, distribution, and assignment on the study area roadway and intersection circulation system. If necessary, mitigation measures for identified project-generated traffic impacts will be recommended in accordance with agency performance criteda and thresholds of significance. Additionally, the study will include capacity analysis of residential streets in the vicinity of the proposed access and whether additional stop signs are warranted. Study Conditions. The analysis will use current traffic volumes to determine existing conditions and will identify traffic impacts under the following scenarios: ' · Existing Conditions; · Near-Term Year Without Project Conditions; and · Near-Term Year With Proposed Project Conditions. StudyArea. As part of the analysis, RBF will count up to four study intersections during the a.m. peak period (7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m.) and the p.m. peak period (4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.) dudng typical weekday conditions. Intersection count data will be collected for vehicles, pedestrians, and bicycles to incorporate into stop-sign warrant analysis. Additionally, up to eight roadway segments will be counted over a 24-hour pedod on a typical weekday. The precise study intersections and roadway segments will be identified based on discussions with the City Traffic Engineer. Trip Generation. The traffic study will identify the number of daily and peak-hour tdps forecast to be generated by the proposed Project, using tdp generation rates contained in Trip Generation (Institute of Transportation Engineers, 7th Edition, 2003), or other source as directed by the City. Based on ITE rates, the proposed project is forecast to generate approximately 871 daily trips, which includes approximately 68 a.m. peak hour trips and approximately 92 p.m. peak hour trips. Trip Distribution andAss~qnmenL The traffic study will provide a forecast distribution of project-generated tdps. Tdp distribution and assignment will be approved by City staff prior to utilization in the analysis. Level of Se/vice. The analysis will assess the proposed project's forecast traffic impacts during the a.m. peak hour and p.m. peak hour at the study intersections. The analysis will document the existing operation of the study intersections, and determine project opening-year operation of the study intersections both with and without the proposed project to identify project-related traffic impacts using the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) analysis methodology. 7! 10-104043 o10o November 19, 2004 I City of Rancho Cucamonga i ~ Proposal for Can*ad Ranch E~R - i Near-term traffic conditions will be forecast either by using specific cumulative projects traffic data supplied by the City or by applying an annual traffic growth rate provided by the City to adjust existing traffic volumes to the designated future horizon year. I If the analysis shows that the proposed project will significantly impact an intersection based on City thresholds of significance, mitigation measures will be I recommended in accordance with the City's performance criteria. San Bemardino CountF Con.qestion Manaqement Pro,qram Analysis. This scope of I work assumes that the project trip generation and distribution does not exceed minimum volume threshold (250 two-way peak-hour trips) utilized to determine whether a San Bernardino County Congestion Management Plan (CMP) analysis is I required, and therefore no CMP analysis is included in this scope of work. Roadway Capacity Analysis. This study will include a roadway capacity analysis at up to six roadway segments to provide an understanding of the number of lanes I required for each roadway segment to accommodate Average daily trip (ADT) volumes both with and without the proposed project. Roadway capacity analysis will be based on the forecast ADT volumes, corresponding roadway capacity, and the I resulting traffic level of service (LOS). Roadway capacity for residential streets will be based on published sources such as the ITE Transportation Planning Handbook or other source as directed by City staff. I Stop-S~qn Warrants. This studywill include preparation of stop-sign warrants at up to three unsignalized intersections to determine whether the proposed project will I create the need for of additional stop-signs. Stop-sign warrants will be based on the methodology identified in Section 2 of the Manualon Uniform Traffic ControlDevices (Federal Highway Administration, 2003) or other methodology, as directed by City staff. I The Traffic Study will be incorporated into the EIR in accordance with the CEQA Guidelines. I E. Air Quality I RBF will identify project-related air pollutant emissions on both a short-term and long-term basis. This technical analysis will follow the protocol for assessing air quality impacts.as contained in the South Coast Air Quality Management District's (SCAQMD) CEQA Air Quality Handbook. The Air Quality section will include the I following subsections: Existinq Conditions. RBF will describe the climatic and meteorological conditions I and ambient air monitoring data for the South Coast Air Basin and local project vicinity. This discussion will include a table indicating the monitoring data from the nearest air monitoring station for the last five years. A description of the regulatory I framework relating to air quality (e.g., California Clean Air Act, Air Quality Management Plan, etc.) will also be provided. I JN 10-104043 .11 · November 19, 2004 I City of Rancho Cucamonga i ~ Proposal for Carrari Ranch EIR . Construction-RelatedEmissions. As the project involves extensive grading activities, I and dust emissions should be in construction equipment exhaust fugitive quantified the EIR. Based on grading activity data provided by the project Applicant (i.e., number and type of equipment needed for grading activities), RBF will estimate I equipment exhaust emissions utilizing the EPA AP-42 emission factors. Fugitive dust emissions will also be quantified based on the number of acres to be graded per day. Construction pollutant emissions will be compared to thresholds of the I South Coast Air Quality Management Distdct (SCAQMD) and mitigation measures recommended to reduce the significance of emissions, where feasible. I Long-Term Emissions. Project operation will generate both stationary emissions and pollutants associated with mobile vehicles of the proposed land uses. RBF will estimate the project's natural gas and power plant emissions based on emission factors provided in the aforementioned SCAQMD CEQA Handbook. Vehicular I emissions will be quantified using the CT-EMFAC7F computer model, then compared to the SCAQMD thresholds to determine significance. Project consistency with regional air quality plans, including the Southem California Association of i Govemments Regional Comprehensive Plan, will also be identified. F. Noise I RBF will evaluate potential noise impacts of the proposed Project, focusing on short- term construction noise, long-term changes in noise levels in the project area due to i traffic changes along area roadways, on-site stationary noise sources, and changes in ambient noise levels associated with increased human activity. This section will specifically address impacts associated with the Project to noise-sensitive land uses, such as residential neighborhoods near the site. The analysis will address existing I conditions, existing-plus-Project conditions, upon and cumulative conditions, based data provided to RBF as set forth in the traffic study. RBF will conduct the following review for the project: I Existing Conditions. RBF will identify relevant existing conditions, including review of applicable planning documents such as the City's General Plan and Noise I Ordinance. RBF will conduct ambient noise measurements at up to five locations to establish the present average sound levels for potentially affected areas (1 O-minute Leq readings will be taken using a Type I rated sound level meter). A noise I measurement map will be produced. Construction-RelatedNoise. RBF will address potential construction-related noise impacts, including typical noise levels from standard construction practices. I Potential associated with of fill will also be identified, based impacts hauling import on proposed haul routes and truck volumes provided by the City. I Traffic Noise. Distance to 65 CNEL (Community Noise Equivalent Level) will be projected, based on traffic figures obtained from the traffic study, vehicle mix assumptions provided by the City traffic engineer, and the FHWA Highway Noise I Prediction Model (RD-77-108), which is the widely accepted method of evaluating roadway noise impacts. Particular attention will be given to road segments in residential areas that will experience traffic increases due to the project. ! 7..* I JN 10-104043 · 12 · November 19, 2004 I City of Rancho Cucamonga i ~;~ Proposal for Carrarl Ranch EIR . i G. Biological Resources RBF has retained BonTerra Consulting to prepare the Biological Resoumes Assessment for the proposed project. The scope of work is as follows: I Literature Review. BonTerra Consulting will conduct a peer review of the existing arbodst and biological resources documentation for the Carrad Ranch project site, if I available. A literature review will also be conducted for the Carrad Ranch project site to determine which species have been identified as special-status species by state, federal, and local resources agencies and organizations, and have a potential to i occur within the project site or immediate vicinity. Sources to be reviewed include: (1) special-status species lists from the California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS); (2) database searches of the I California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) and the electronic inventory of the California Native Plant Society (CNPS); and (3) other biological studies conducted in the vicinity of the project site. I Vegetation Mapping General Plant and Wildlife Surveys. Vegetation types will be mapped to identify and describe the extent and distribution of various vegetation types on the Carrari Ranch project site, including any special-status vegetation I types. During the vegetation mapping, an assessment will be made of the potential for special-status plant species to be present. A description of the existing quality and species composition of the vegetation types will be compiled based upon observations and field notes taken dudng the survey. This effort does not include a I wetlands delineation. A general walk-over survey will be conducted to document existing wildlife use on I of the Carrari Ranch site, including an the proposed development portion project assessment of the potential for special- status wildlife species that may be present. During the wildlife surveys, active searches for nonsensitive wildlife species will be I accomplished by systematic surveys through appropriate habitat. Active searches for reptiles and amphibians will include lifting, overturning, and carefully replacing rocks and debris. Birds will be identified by standard visual and auditory recognition. I The presence of nests or other evidence of breeding activity also will be noted during these surveys. Mammal searches will be conducted dudng the day and will include searching for and identifying diagnostic sign, including scat, footprints, I scratch-outs, dusting bowls, burrows, and trails. Each habitat type will be evaluated for its potential to support .common mammal species that include their home range in the project area. Focused surveys for special-status species are not included within i this work effort. A compendia of plant and wildlife species observed during field surveys on the project site will be developed, based on observations from field notes. The I compendia will be included with the documentation for the project site (see Biological Technical Report, below). ! ! 7'/ I JN 10-104043 .13o November 19, 2004 City of Rancho Cucamonga ~ Proposal for Carrari Ranch EIR Biologica! Technical Report. A Biological Technical Report will be developed for the Carrari Ranch based the results of various and project on biological surveys analysis. The report will describe (a) the methodology used to conduct the biological surveys; (b) a detailed description of the existing vegetation types and associated wildlife resources on the project site; (c) potential impacts from project development; and (d) recommended mitigation measures to reduce identified impacts to less than significant levels. RBF will incorporate the Biological Resources Assessment prepared by BonTerra into the EIR in accordance with the CEQA Guidelines. H. Cultural Resources RBF has retained CRM Tech to conduct the Cultural Resources Assessment for the proposed project. The analysis will be focused on the proposed development portion of the site. To accomplish the required analysis, the following tasks are included: · Initiate a records search for historical and archaeological resources at the Archaeological Information Center at the San Bemardino County Museum; · Conduct historical background research on the basis of eady maps depicting the project area; · Conduct a field survey of the project area following standard professional archaeological procedures; · Field-record any artifacts, features, sites, or structures older than 50 years; · Conduct site-specific historical studies (including archival research, interviews, and consultations) to determine past land uses and owners and to explore historical associations, if necessary; · Complete site record(s) and submit them to the Archaeological Information Center; · Prepare a final Cultural Resources Assessment to document the findings of tasks identified above, identifying all potential cultural resources within the project area, discussing their integrity and historical significance, and recommending subsequent courses of action regarding such resources, if necessary. RBF will incorporate the Cultural Assessment into the EIR in accordance with the CEQA Guidelines. I. Public Safety Because of fire safety concems in the Project area, RBF's GIS Department will prepare a Fire Response Time Analysis and our Landscape Architecture Department will prepare a Wildland Fire Interface and Fuel Modification Analysis. The scope of the analyses is as follows: 04043 · 14 · November 19, 2004 I City of Rancho Cucamonga i ~ Proposal for Carrari Ranch EIR i Fire Response Time Analysis. RBF Consulting's GIS Department will conduct the Fire Response Time Analysis. The GIS Department is an industry leader in GIS technologies and has completed several recent projects utilizing GIS routing analysis capabilities to demonstrate the movement of emergencyvehicles on a mad network. I To begin this project, RBF will prepare a GIS analysis of the road network in and surrounding the incorporated City of Rancho Cucamonga to model the travel of emergency equipment. Using base road data from the City or from a national I vendor, RBF will develop a street network model that can be used to predict the movement of vehicles throughout the study area, using industry-accepted rules for travel of emergency equipment. The street data will be in the California State Plane I Zone 6 projection and NAD83 datum. In addition to these base roads, RBF will obtain additional roads and database information that might include new and planned roads, as well as additional traffic control information. These additional data i will be used to update the base road datasets. Planned roads can alternatively be provided on subdivision maps or other existing engineering documents and will be registered and digitized for modeling purposes. This data will be entered into the road network in the same datum and projection. It is important that these data be in I the same defined coordinates, because it will allow RBF to model the traffic flow as if the new or planned streets were constructed and to measure length of mad segments in feet. I The model will be based upon generalized travel assumptions for emergency traffic flow. One assumption is that the travel time from intersection to intersection is based I upon a speed determined by road classification as provided from the street datasets and by the length of the roadway, along with the consideration of intersection delays. For the study, intersection delays are based on assumed traffic signal and stop sign locations determined by intersecting street classification. Should a more detailed I analysis be required, can optionally perform a RBF reconnaissance of the studyarea to field-verify the locations of the traffic signals, stop signs, grade, curvature, and speed limits. These factors could make substantive changes to the emergency I vehicle's travel distance and are not included in the budget presented with this scope. Based on the preliminary assumptions, RBF will model travel from up to ten locations within the proposed study area to a travel time of 12 minutes. I The initial modeling runs will identify the distance an emergency vehicle can travel within approximately 3-minute increments to the prescribed 12-minute total travel I interval. This interval will be measured from the station locations within or neighboring the City to determine their effectiveness in serving the community. An additional study will be performed to determine the maximum travel distance from the most remote location within the new development up to the 12-minute interval. This I how far station be located from the development and still will demonstrate a can new fully serve the development within the prescribed time interval. I Changes will be made to the road network model, intersection parameters, additional time intervals, station locations, or other modeling factors based on input from the client, as needed, on a time-and-materials basis. The scope and budget provided I for this modeling project is based on the inclusion of average street segment slopes (to be provided by the City's Engineering Department) for those streets where the City believes slope to be a relevant factor in the travel time of an emergency vehicle. i Also, curvature of each street segment will be a factor added to the model in determining the average speed an emergency vehicle can travel on that particular I JN 10-104043 o15o November 19, 2004 City of Rancho Cucamonga Proposal for Carrari Ranch EIR . segment. New street segments and average street segment slope will be marked on the City'Engineering Department and returned to RBF within one a plotted map by week to update the model. I The base map for this project will provide a roadway network built upon data provided from Amedcan Digital Cartography, Inc. (ADCi), last updated in 1996. Intersection delays for traffic signals and stop signs will be based on standard traffic I design practices and may not represent the actual conditions in the field. Vehicle travel speeds will be based upon the classification of the roadway as determined by ADCi and as approved by the Fire Marshal prior to beginning the modeling exercise. i The study area will include the E IR project area and adjoining streets of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, including those streets that could affect emergency services access to the project site. Precise fire station locations (location on the street network model)will be provided bythe City prior to beginning the modeling exercise. I maximum of 12 model alternatives will be provided showing the individual or A cumulative coverage from one fire station, a select group, or all included stations. Studies may also include analysis from a remote location to determine the best I placement for a future fire station. The final products will be in the form of 11"x17" hard-copy maps; up to four copies of each map will be provided upon request, for a total of 48 map exhibits. I The Fire Response Time Analysis will be incorporated into the EIR in accordance with the CEQA Guidelines. I Wildland Fire lnterface and Fuel Modification Analysis. RBF will prepare an analysis of wildland fire and fuel modification impacts on the project design. This task includes the following: I · Conduct site visit to review, assess, and photograph the existing vegetation conditions; I · Review the proposed site plan, program, and design (to be provided by the Applicant) for addressing the wildland fire danger; · Investigate wildland fire and fuel modification standards from the City, I County, and local fire authority, as applicable; and · Prepare written text and graphics as necessary to adequately address the wildland fire interface and fuel modification requirements. I The Wildland Fire Interface and Fuel Modification Analysis be incorporated into the EIR in accordance with the CEQA Guidelines. I J. Seismicity and Soils RBF will address potential impacts of geology, soils, and seismicity based on existing I information, including the RMA Group Review of Major Geotehnical and Geological Constraints (Apdl, 2003), the U.S. Geology Survey, U.S. Division of Mines and Geology data (geology and seismic maps), and U.S. Soils Conservation Service Soil I Survey maps. The analysis will identify existing regional and site specific geology and soils constraints (such as compressible soils; landslide hazards; disruptions, displacements, compaction, or ovemovering of the soil; and areas subject to i subsidence), areas potentially subject to significant grading impacts, seismic hazards, existing topography, landform modifications, wind and/or water erosion I J N 1 O-104043 · 16 · November 19, 2004 City of Rancho Cucamonga Proposal for Can'aH Ranch EIR . potential of the soils on the Project site and surrounding areas, and slope instability. Particular attention will be paid to the identified landslide areas, as well as special design considerations for areas shown to be near active or potentially active faults. RBF will recommend mitigation measures to reduce potential impacts to the extent feasible, such as erosion control cdteda and grading requirements, to ensure consistency with the grading standards and policies in the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. K. Hydrology and Drainage RBF's Stormwater Department will conduct the Drainage Technical Assessment for incorporation into the EIR. The scope of work is as follows: Review and Research of Existinq Reports. RBF will conduct research and I investigation compile existing reports previously to literature and prepared regarding the tributary watershed and drainage systems impacting the approximately 381-acre Carrad Ranch area. Research shall include review of previous engineering hydrelogy studies and drainage master plans that specificallyencompass or address the site. A kickoff meeting and site visit will also be conducted. The kickoff meeting will include discussions with City and/or County staff regarding the specific drainage I requirements of the project and specific cdteda for this area. Watershed Boundary Delineation. RBF will: Prepare an analysis of the existing i watershed and drainage pattems associated with the proposed project boundary. · Determine the local watershed subboundaries for the tributary drainage area in order to evaluate (1) the storm drain watershed area and (2) existing I facility requirements. · Measure the drainage areas and the watershed parameters associated with I the subareas for the different analyses. · Identify cdtical concentration points to develop a "link-node" rational I hydrology model. · Provide watershed delineation for the proposed development, which includes i only a single land use plan. The work program assumes that the City and/or Applicant will provide a conceptual grading plan to identify the drainage patterns. Offsite topography is I anticipated to be provided by the City and/or Applicant or USGS. Existing Hydroloqic Conditions Analysis. RBF will prepare preliminary estimated I peak runoff rates associated with the existing surface hydrology of the watershed drainage area. The drainage boundaries and subareas will be delineated, and results of the hydrology analysis will be summarized on a hydrology map. RBF will prepare 25-year and 100-year frequency storms rational hydrology analysis for the project watershed. The analysis will utilize San Bemardino County hydrology procedures and cdteria to develop peak discharges which are consistent with the i procedures outlined in the San Bemardino County Hydrology Manual. I JN 10-104043 · 17 · November 19, 2004 I City of Rancho Cucamonga i ~ Proposal for Carrari Ranch EIR . Proposed Development Hydrology. RBF will prepare a preliminary developed- I condition surface for the 381-acre Project site based San hydrology analysis upon Bemardino hydrology criteda and methodology to quantify the design runoff rates. A single rational hydrology analysis will be prepared for a single proposed land use I plan for the property. The analysis will develop peak discharges for the 25- and 100- year rainfall event to satisfy the jurisdictional design requirements. Drainage subareas and patterns will be identified, based upon the proposed local storm drain I system and grading indicated on the plans or approved land use concept provided by the Client. I Proposed Drainaqe Facilities. RBF will prepare an evaluation of the preliminary underground storm drain system requirements to provide the necessary level of flood protection and hydraulic conveyance. Preliminary horizontal alignments of facilities will be identified and the size requirements for hydraulic conveyance (assuming I estimated, structures and conceptual locations of uniform depth) will be Unique stormwater quality features will be identified. RBF will also perform conceptual sizing of detention basins to determine the necessary stormwater storage volume onsite (if I mitigation is required) to attenuate the peak development flowrates to the existing conditions. I Surface Water Quality Facilities Sizing. RBF will prepare a preliminary assessment and sizing of the required stormwater detention facilities based upon Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board criteria. A variety of acceptable facilities will i be identified that provide m t gate water quality concems as part of a conceptual water quality program for the development and a adopted solution can be selected from the recommended list. I Technical RBF will a wdtten report summarizing the Report Preparation. prepare drainage assessment requirements for the project, particularly focusing on the post- projection watershed hydrologic conditions. The report will review the drainage I constraints, off-site and on-site hydrology, flooding impacts, drainage design criteria, and drainage infrastructure requirements. The report will include graphics supporting hydrologic calculations and water quality features. All hydrologic and I hydraulic analysis for the site, analysis assumptions, and all reference documents will be included in an appendix. The Drainage Technical Assessment will be incorporated into the EIR in accordance I with the CEQA Guidelines. i L. Public Services and Utilities RBF will contact potentially affected agencies to identify relevant existing conditions, project impacts, and recommended mitigation measures. The discussion will focus on the potential alteration of existing facilities, extension or expansion of new facilities, and the increased demand on services based on the proposed land uses. RBF will evaluate the ability of the project area to receive adequate service based on I City and applicable County standards and, where adequate services are not available, will identify the effects of inadequate service and recommended mitigation measures. Issues expected to be discussed will include: I JN 10-104043 * 18 · November 19, 2004 I City of Rancho Cucamonga ~ Proposal for Carrari Ranch EIR · Solid Waste. Solid waste generation resulting from the proposed Project I landfill The analysis will establish baseline uses may impact capacities. projections for solid waste, including composting and recycling for both construction and operation of the project. The Project's compliance with the I waste reduction requirements of AB 939 (1989) will also be addressed. · Fire. The overall need for Fire Services would potentially increase beyond I existing conditions as a result of the project. The site is within a high fire hazard area and is subject to special wildland/urban interface hazard mitigation requirements. The Fire Services review will include a review of i existing services and facilities in the area, response times to the site (which include emergency hazardous material response times), available fire flow, project impacts, and required mitigation. Impacts regarding potential wildland fire impacts will be evaluated in the Public Safety Section, described I in Task 2.5.1. · Police. The Police Service review will focus upon response times to the site, I available personnel, and overall protection services. The overall need for police protection services would increase beyond existing conditions as a result of the project. Mitigation incorporated into the project design, including I lighting, signage, and security hardware to further reduce crime, will be identified. i · Schools. Analysis of potential impacts on schools will focus on existing conditions, student capacities, current enrollment, and facility locations. Generation rates resulting from the project will be the basis of the impact analysis. Mitigation measures will be provided to reduce the significance of I impacts. · Parks and Recreation. The review will include overall parkland conditions in I the City and impacts that the project may have on the City park system. Potential impacts will be identified with mitigation to reduce the significance of impacts. I · Roadway Maintenance. The proposed project may incrementally increase the maintenance of streets, storm drains, and other below surface facilities. i RBF will consult with the project team and City Public Works Division to ascertain key concerns and impacts due to increased utilization of area reads. I · Water. RBF will focus on existing water sources and availability, project usage, infrastructure connections, easements modifications, and necessary mitigation. I · Sewer. RBF will focus on existing capacities, project generation, infrastructure connection, easements modifications, and necessary I mitigation. · Electrical RBF will analyze existing facilities, project impacts, infrastructure i relocation, undergrounding of overhead lines, easements, and necessary mitigation. I JN 10-104043 · 19 · November 19, 2004 I City of Rancho Cucamonga i ~ Proposal for Carrari Ranch EIR I · Telephone. RBF will facilities, analyze existing project impacts, infrastructure relocated, undergrounding of overhead lines, easements, and necessary mitigation. I · Gas. RBF will analyze existing facilities, project impacts, infrastructure relocation, easements, and necessary mitigation. I 2,6 GROWTH INDUCEMENT RBF will discuss potential growth-inducing impacts pumuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.2. The analysis in this section will be based on data from the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia Department of Finance, Southern California i Association of Governments and U.S. Census data. The Project's impact upon the balance between jobs, housing and population will be discussed, and mitigation for any potential impacts will be recommended. I 2.7 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15130, RBF will discuss cumulative I impacts for each environmental issue area identified above, focusing on cumulative impacts and levels of severity in the Project area both quantitatively and qualitatively. The analysis will include potential future development in the Project area, and focus i upon cumulative impacts from recently approved and/or pending projects in proximity to the Project site. (Cumulative Project information is to be provided as stated in Task 2.4.) I 2.8 ALTERNATIVES PROPOSED ACTION TO THE Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6, RBF will analyze a "reasonable I range" of altematives, comparing environmental impacts of each altemative in each impact area to the project. (For budgeting purposes, RBF assumes four alternatives.) For each alternative, RBF will provide an analysis of impacts to environmental I resources. One important element of the Alternatives section will be an impact matdx (table), which will compare of the varying levels of impact of each alternative being analyzed. This matdx format will allow decisionmakers a reference that will be I easily understood, and will provide a calculated (where feasible), accurate comparison of each alternative. The Alternatives section will conform to both the 1998 amendments to Section I 15126.6 of the State CEQA Guidelines and to recent and court applicable cases. RBF will discuss, as required by the State CEQA Guidelines, the advantages and disadvantages of each alternative and the reasons for rejecting or recommending I the project altematives stated. The Alternatives section will culminate with the selection of the environmentally superior alternative in accordance with CEQA requirements. I I J N 10-104043 o 20 · November 19, 2004 I City of Rancho Cucamonga i i~~ Proposal for Can'aH Ranch EIR i 2.9 ADDITIONAL SECTIONS RBF will provide additional sections in the EIR to meet CEQA and City requirements including the following: I A. S~qnificant Irreversible Environmental Chan.qes That Would Be Involved in the Proposed Action Should It Be Implemented I Changes in the environment and uses of nonrenewable resources that will occur as a result of the proposed Project that can be considered irreversible I or irretrievable will be evaluated and discussed within this section of the EIR. B. Effects Found Not To Be S~qnificant I RBF will provide a qualitative explanation of issues checked "No Impact" in the Initial Study in order to substantiate the conclusions of the Initial Study checklist. I C. Inventory of Miti.qation Measures I This section will comprehensively list mitigation measures for the proposed Project. To allow direct incorporation of mitigation measures into Conditions of Approval, RBF will summarize mitigation measures, which will be I numbered consecutively. D. Inventory of Unavoidable Adverse Impacts I This section will comprehensively list unavoidable adverse impacts associated with the proposed Project. I and Persons Consulted/Biblioclral~hv E. Or,qanizations Any federal, state, or local agencies, other organizations, and pdvate I individuals consulted in preparing the EIR will be listed in this section. RBF will provide a complete bibliography that lists reference materials used in preparation of the EIR. 2.10 GRAPHIC EXHIBITS I The EIR will include a maximum of 25 exhibits to enhance the written text and clarity the proposed Project environmental impacts. Using state-of-the-art computer design equipment and techniques, our in-house graphic design team will create i professional-quality, black-and white or full-color exhibits, dividers and covers for the EIR and its appendices. All graphics will be coordinated with the City's Planning Department and GIS staff and will be formatted in compliance with existing City software requirements (ARCVIEW). This task assumes that camera-ready base I maps are provided by the City. All exhibits will be 81/2" x 1 1" in size, unless othenvise directed by City staff. I JN 10-104043 .21 · November 19, 2004 I City of Rancho Cucamonga i ~ Proposal for Carrari Ranch EIR i Deliverables: · Five (5) bound copies of the Screencheck Draft EIR, exhibits and Technical Appendices · One (1) electronic copy of the Screencheck Draft EIR i and Exhibits 3.0 DRAFT EIR I 3.1 PRELIMINARY DRAFT EIR RBF will respond to one complete set of City comments on the Screencheck Draft I EIR, If desired by the City, RBF will provide the Preliminary Draft of the EIR with all changes highlighted to assist the final check of the document. I Deliverables: · Five (5) copies of the Draft EIR, exhibits and Technical Appendices · One (1) electronic copy of the Preliminary Draft EIR i and exhibits 3.2 COMPLETION OF THE DRAFT EIR m RBF will to review of the Draft EIR and will the report respond a Preliminary prepare for the required 45-day public review period. In addition, RBF will prepare the Notice of Completion (NCC) for submittal to the California Office of Planning and Research m (OPR). RBF will also work with the City to develop a distribution list for the NCC and Draft EIR. Deliverables: · Fifty (50) bound copies of the Draft EIR, exhibits, and Technical Appendices · Fifty (50) copies of the Notice of Completion I · One (1) camera-ready unbound original of the Draft EIR, exhibits and Technical Appendices · One (1) electronic copy of the Draft EIR, exhibits and i~ Technical Appendices 4.0 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT m 4.1 RESPONSE TO COMMENTS RBF will respond to all comments received on the Draft EIR during the 45-day public m review pedod, and any to additional comments raised during public hearings. RBF will prepare thorough, reasoned, and sensitive responses to relevant environmental issues. This task includes wdtten responses to both written and oral comments I received on the Draft EIR (includes review of headng transcripts, as required). The Draft Responses to Comments will be prepared for review by City staff. Following review of the Draff Responses to Comments, RBF will finalize this section for I inclusion in the Administrative Final EiR. Deliverables: · Five (5) copies of the Draff Responses to Comments · One (1) electronic copy of the Response to m JN 10-104043 · 22 · November 19, 2004 City of Rancho Cucamonga Proposal for Can'ad Ranch EIR - 4.2 FINAL EIR i The Final EIR will consist of the revised Draft EIR text, as necessary, and the "Comments to Responses" section. The Draft EIR will be revised in accordance with the responses to public comments on the EIR. To facilitate City review, RBF will format the Administrative Draft of the Final EIR with shaded text for any new or i modified text, and "strike-out" text for deleted text. RBF will also any prepare and file the Notice of Determination within five (5) days of EIR certification. I Deliverables: · Five (5) copies of the Administrative Final EIR, including exhibits and Technical Appendices · Fifty (50) copies of the Final EIR, including exhibits I and Technical Appendices · One (1) unbound camera-ready original of the Final EIR, exhibits and Technical Appendices i · One (1) electronic copy of the Final EIR, including exhibits and Technical Appendices · One (1) electronic copy of the Final EIR, including exhibits and Technical Appendices on compact disk I in readable format a · Notice of Determination Filing I 4.3 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM To comply with the Public Resoumes Code Section 21081.6, RBF will prepare a I Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program to be defined through working with City staff to identify appropriate monitoring steps and procedures and to provide a basis for monitoring such measures dudng and upon Project implementation. I The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Checklist will serve as the foundation of the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the proposed Project. The Checklist indicates the mitigation measure number as outlined in the EIR, the EIR I page measure documented), a list of Mitigation Measure and reference (where the is Conditions of Approval (in chronological order under the appropriate environmental topic), the Monitoring Milestone (what agency or department is responsible for I verifying implementation of the measure), Method of Verification (documentation, field checks, etc.), and a verification section for the initials of the verifying individual, date of verification, and pertinent remarks. I Deliverables: · Five (5) copies of the Draft Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program i · Twenty (20) copies of the Final Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program · One (1) camera-ready unbound odginal of the final I Mitigation and Monitoring Program · One (1) electronic copy of the Final Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program i i JN I0-104043 °23° November 19, 2004  City of Rancho Cucamonga Proposal for Can'aH Ranch EIR It is the goal of RBF to serve as an extension of City staff throughout the duration of the EIR Project. As is stated in Understanding of the Project, RBF will be available to meet with staffto discuss particular Project parameters, as required bythe City. In addition, RBF will prepare monthly progress reports for the Project, ~vhich would be submitted with the monthly invoices. Each progress report will include a summary of tasks performed and the percentage of work completed to date according to individual task. Deliverables: · Monthly work progress reports submitted by RBF to the City 6.0 OPTIONAL TASKS The following task has been included so that the City may select additional services which may be required. This task has not been calculated into the total budget. 6.1 LONG-RANGE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Included in this scope of work is an optional task to prepare a long-range traffic analysis to address pre-zoning the project site in anticipation of annexation by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the analysis shows that the proposed project will significantly impact an intersection for forecast long- range scenarios based on City of Rancho Cucamonga thresholds of significance, mitigation measures will be recommended in accordance with City of Rancho Cucamonga performance cdteda. 10-104043 o25- November 19, 2004 I  City of Rancho Cucamonga I Proposal for Carra~i Ranch ~ III. PRELIMINARY PROJECT SCHEDULE ! i ::::::1 --:::::: , I, II HHN:i:: ::::::_:-::_H; ! ' :-:-:: I 11 11 .... ' ::-: !:-i :-'-- :- :- :- -: H i ! I /l_~/~/~/~l~l~/~l~:/~/~/~/~/~l I I I / I I I /~11~/~/~/~/~1~/~/~/~/~-/~/~1~/~1 I I I I I I /"'11~/~/-I/~/~/~/~/~/~I~/~1~1~/;~1 / I I I I I I JN 10-104043 · 26- November 19, 2004 I i City of Rancho Cucamonga I Proposal for Carrari Ranch EIR. ! IV. SUMMARY OF QUALIFICATIONS RBF Consulting is a multidisciplinary planning, engineering, and surveying firm with a total staff of I in Contra Costa, Matin, Santa Clara, Ontario, Orange, Riverside, over 800 professionals and offices San Bernardino, Ventura, Los Angeles, and San Diego counties. With 60 years of public and private sector experience, RBF is respected and recognized in the profession of consulting planning, environmental, and engineering services throughout the state of Califomia. RBF has in-house expertise in environmental analysis, planning, GIS services, surveying, aedal photogrammetry, mapping, real estate assessments, transpodation and traffic engineering, civil engineering r~ (including grading, public works, water and wastewater, hydrology), mechanical, electrical and energy services, computar-aided design and drafting (CADD) and media services. Over 50 professionals ara dedicated to planning, environmental services and landscape architecture. i RBF possesses the full range of disciplines necessary to provide turn-key planning, design and implementation of a wide range of projects. We combine our expertise in development projects and urban planning, transportation, and air quality management to develop and assess project designs I that minimize impacts on the natural environment and community. The following is a comprehensive list of RBF departments and services: I DEPARTMENTS AREAS OF EXPERTISE Land Planning and Conceptual Design; Master Planning; Site Planning; Hillside Grading; Landscape i Urban Design: Architecture; Redevelopment and Infill Land Use Planning; Illustrative Plans; Pedestrian and Vehicular Trail Studies; Visual Analysis; Design Guidelines and Development Standards. I Policy Planning: Specific Plans, General Plans; Community Participation Programs; Project Management and Coordination; Feasibility and Special Studies; Fee Programs; Entitlement to Use (including zone changes, General Plan Amendments and annexation studies); Redevelopment Studies; Consultant Coordination; I Governmental Agencies and Public Liaison; and Development Support ServiCes through Construction. Environmental Environmental Impact Reports/Statements; Expanded Initial Studies and I Mitigation Monitoring Programs; Public Participation Services: Negative Declarations; Programs; Natural Resource Management; Resource Mitigation Permits; EIR and ElS Review; Noticing; Statements of Overriding Considerations; Findings; and Special Studies, such as Phase I Site Assessment for hazardous materials, as well as noise and air quality monitoring and modeling. Transportation Master Plans of Circulation; Transportation Planning and Engineering; Traffic i Planning: Impact Studies; Traffic Control Plans; Traffic Signal Coordination; Traffic Signal Design; Congestion Management Programs; Street Lighting; Signing, Striping, and Construction Detour Plans. I Media Services: Report Graphics; Presentation Graphics; View Analysis; illustrations; Slide Shows; Video Services; and CADD Illustrative Plans. I Civil Engineering: Subdivision Engineering; Structural Engineering; Engineering Design; and CADD mapping. Mechanical and Commercial Office Buildings; Retail Shopping Centers; Educational Facilities; i Electrical Engineering: Hotels and Motels; Industrial buildings; Special Energy Systems; Entertainment and Performing Arts Centers; and Computer Centers. I J N 10-104043 · 27 · November 1 9, 2004 a City of Rancho Cucamonga Proposal for Carrari Ranch EIR _ quality; noise; biological resources; geology and soils; hydrology and drainage; and public services and utilities. Robinson Ranch North Environmental Impact Report City of Yucaipa RBF prepared the Environmental Impact Report for Robinson Ranch North. The project consists of 159 acres located north of Interstate 10 and east of Oak Glen Road in Yucaipa. It comprises two separate development plans: a Preliminary Development Plan (PDP) on 159 acres, which requires a General Plan Amendment to adopt the proposed Land Use Plan; and a Final Development Plan (FDP) on 90 acres at the western portion of the project area, which includes Oak Ridge Village, a 695,000-square-foot commercial center. The remaining 69 acres, the Wildwcod Center, comprises 24 single-family residential units on 6 acres, 216 multiple-family units on 27 acres, general commercial uses on 24 acres, and 12 acres of natural open space. The General Plan designates the sites as within the Planned Development (PD) Land Use District. The project proposes an amendment to the General Plan to adopt a Land Use Plan for 114 acres of commercial uses and 240 residential dwelling units. The PD Land Use Distdct designation would be retained on both sites. The project was highly controversial, as exemplified by the over 400 residents who attended the EIR Certification Hearing. Key areas of concem raised by area residents and reviewing agencies were the project's consistency with City regulations for hillside development, impacts associated with flood zones and Yucaipa Creek, consistency with seismic safety requirements, area-wide traffic impacts, compatibility with neighboring land uses, and Project altematives. The EIR provided an in- depth review of all subject areas of concem and concluded that a Statement of Overriding Considerations was needed for land use, air quality, and noise. The work program included a peer review of several applicant-generated studies by the RBF team. Northern Foothills Implementation Program EIR City of San Dimas RBF completed the Final Program EIR for this 3,000-acre project area in the San Gabriel Mountain foothills. The overall objective of the project was to fit future projects into the hillside setting, rather than altering the hillside to fit the projects. 'This was an important objective, given that topographic elevations in the project area range from 1,000 to 3,200 feet above sea level and that the area is characterized by steep terrain, narrow canyons, and broad ddgelines. The overall average slope of the area is 52 percent. There is also evidence of a number of landslides and slope failures in the area and the area is traversed by the Cucamonga branch of the Sierra Madre Fault. The project involved a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change/Specific Plan to create a "Northem Foothills" land use designation, which would permit a maximum of 127 dwelling units on the 972 vacant acres in the project area, as opposed to the 195 dwelling units permitted under the existing General Plan. Significant environmental issues analyzed in the Program EIR included access and circulation, fire protection services, landform alteration, biological resources, hydrology and drainage, geology and seismicity, and land use and relevant planning. A unique feature of the project was the development of mitigation measures that served as development standards, many of which were included as such in the Specific Plan. In addition, the EIR Program was completed within seven months to meet the City's deadline of completion of the GPA, Zone Change/Specific Plan and Program EIR prior to the July 1999 expiration of the City's moratorium on development in the northern foothills area. November 19, 2004 JN 10-104043 -29,  City of Rancho Cucarnonga Proposal for Carrari Ranch EIR Subsequent to City Council certification of the Final EIR, one of the property owners within the project area challenged the adequacy of the EIR; however, the court ruled that the EIR was legally adequate. Environmental Impact Report Sierra Meadows County of Madera RBF Consulting (RBF) is currently preparing the Environmental Impact Report for the Sierra (EIR) Meadows Estates project. The EIR evaluates the 487-acre property area, which consists of densely vegetated, undeveloped land adjacent to the Sierra Meadows Golf Course in unincorporated eastern Madera County. The Project consists of a 315 single-family residential lot subdivision with lots varying in size from approximately 7,000 square feet (sf.) to more than five acres. The Project includes an approximately 210-acre-foot water reservoir to supplement the existing 90 acre-feet of water storage in three existing ponds to store a total of approximately 300-acre feet of water. Additional project features include on-site water and wastewater treatment plants. Proposed entitlements include a General Plan Amendment, rezoning, and special district formation or expansion. Key environmental issues include, but are not limited to, land use compatibility; visual and aesthetics; resources; biological resources; traffic and circulation; geology and soils; hydrology and water quality; and public services and utilities. Moon Camp Environmental Impact Report County of San Bernardino RBF has diligently worked to prepare the Moon Camp EIR for the County of San Bemardino. The project consists of 64 acres located on the north shore of Big Bear Lake in the Community of Fawnskin, in unincorporated San Bemardino County.- The project proposed a 95-1ot residential subdivision with lots ranging in size from approximately 0.17 acres (7,292 square feet) to 2.11 acres. The project includes a boat dock, consisting of 100 boat slips, and relocation of North Shore Ddve, which is designated by the County as a Scenic Highway. An estimated 2,772 trees exist on-site; approximately 655 trees (24 percent) of the existing trees would be removed for roadway construction. Additional tree impacts would occur during individual lot development. The project also includes a General Plan Amendment and Land Use Distdct Amendment involving residential uses. The project is highly controversial, which was exemplified by the numerous residents and visitors to the Fawnskin area who attended the EIR Scoping Meeting. Key areas of concern raised by area residents and reviewing agencies included the project's consistency with County's regulations for hillside development, impacts associated with the visual character of the area, consistency with seismic safety requirements, area-wide traffic impacts, compatibility with neighboring land uses and alternatives, impacts on biological resources (bald eagle, southem rubber boa, California spotted owl, and southwestern willow flycatcher) and availability of high-quality water supplies. The EIR provided an in-depth review of all subject areas of concern and included a peer review of several Applicant generated studies by the RBF team. RBF was actively involved in the project from initiation, working with the County and Project Applicant and facilitating public meetings. North Village 1999 Specific Plan Amendment Program EIR Town of Mammoth Lakes The approved No~th Village Specific Plan (1991is a destination resort facility including lodging, commercial, and residential uses on 64.1 acres. The proposed amendment includes circulation and parking modifications, changes to height limitations and setbacks, changes in development JN 10-104043 o30o November 1 2004 9,  City of Rancho Cucamonga Proposal for Carrari Ranch EIR - standards, establishment of design guidelines, modifications to public facilities, and housing requirement changes. These amendment provisions, coupled with the elapsed time since the 1991 certification of the odginal North Village Specific Plan EIR, warranted further review through an updated Program EIR. In addition, the evaluation included the development application for Phase 1 of the Specific Plan. Key issues have included traffic generations, aesthetics, noise, and water quality, including a review of compliance with the Lahontan Regional Water Quality Control Board. Birch Hills Specific Plan EIR City of Brea RBF prepared the EIR for this 152.9-acre site, which includes Birch Hills Golf Course and a former Unocal chemical plant (which utilized ammonia, natural gas, and nitrates in the manufacturing of fertilizers). The proposed Birch Hills Specific Plan would establish a multi-use development of residential, general commercial and recreational land uses. The plan proposes a total of 475 residential units, which includes affordable housing units to meet City requirements. Development of the Iow-density residential area and 7.5-acre community park required relocation of Birch Hills Golf Course. The proposed development was adjacent to established residential neighborhoods was highly part to the proposed residential densities, commercial uses, and and controversial due in loss of mature trees. The Final EIR and project approval process was successful, with only moderate public comments on the Draft EIR, pdmadly due to extensive public scoping and thorough analysis of the issues in the Draft EIR. The project required substantial infrastructure improvements, including realignment and covedng of the Loftus Channel, half-width improvements to Impedal Highway (an Orange County "Smart Street" and a Caltrans facility), and regional dding and hiking trails that traverse the site. Long Point Resort Project EIR City of Rancho Palos Verdes RBF prepared a Program EIR on behalf of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes for the Long Point Resort project. The proposal includes development of a full-service hotel providing approximately 582 guestro0ms, restaurants and bars, and meeting and event function spaces. Also proposed were approximately 31.6 acres of conserved or enhanced habitat and approximately 81 acres of public open space and recreation facilities including public parking, shoreline access ramps, public parks and overlooks, public walking and hiking trails, a public golf practice facility, and a 9-hole public-use golf course. The project area has two separate components. The Lower Point Vicente, which sits on the coastal bluff and has historically been referred to as the former Madneland, is proposed to include a hotel complex and pdmary resort amenities. The Upper Point Vicente (north, or Lower-Point, Vicente), which is land under city ownership, is primarily devoted to golf holes and conservation areas. Key issues have included biological resources, traffic, public safety (golf), geologic stability of the bluffs, view impacts, and project altematives. project extensive controversy and criticism from the community. RBF's role, on behalf The involved of the City, was to ensure that a proper and complete environmental review process was conducted and to fully respond to environmental concerns of agencies and area residents. JN 10-104043 o31 · November 2004 19,  City of Rancho Cucamonga Proposal for Carrari Ranch EIR Ritter Ranch Specific Plan/EIR City of Palmdale P, BF prepared the EIR for the Ritter Ranch project, which is an annexation area totaling 10,625 acres designated as open space area and the remaining 3,025 acres, with approximately 7,600 acres planned for development. The Specific Plan proposed development of 7,200 single-family and multi-family units, a town center commemial area, and recreational uses, including an 18-hole golf course. The project would result in extensive impacts on the region, as it represents a significant increase in residential and commercial land uses from densities presently indicated on City and regional plans. The EIR analysis included detailed evaluations of the following: ¢o Geologic, soil, and grading impacts associated with the San Andreas Fault Zone, which cresses the northern portion of the site; Impacts on the natural resources on-site, including Joshua, juniper and oak tree habitat and significant archaeological findings that have been delineated; and Extensive infrastructure improvements, required as roadways, services, and utilities would be established on-site. Yucaipa Valley Acres Final EIR (Chapman Heights Final Supplemental EIR) County of San Bemardino/City of Yucaipa RBF was hired by the County of San Bemardino to prepare a Final EiR analyzing the potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed 1,012-acre, 3,847-unit planned development located in the City of Yucaipa at the base of Craflon Hills, approximately four miles east of the City of Redlands. RBF hydrologists were consulted to analyze stormflows relative to the portions of the project that are located within a floodway. The recommendations of RBF's hydrologists included a system of proposed improvements to reduce flood hazards both on and off the project site. Other features of the plan requiring special technical analysis involved maintaining safe yields for project water supplies, impacts on an on-site water reclamation facility, and management of traffic impacts. RBF also prepared the Final Supplemental EIR for the revised project, referred to as the Chapman project was within the jurisdiction of the City of Heights Planned Development. The at that time Yucaipa. Ontario Gateway Plaza Specific Plan EIR City of Ontado RBF prepared the EIR for the Ontado Gateway Plaza Specific Plan site, located on 57.3 acres in the City of Ontario in southwestern San Bernardino County. The Specific Plan proposed a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to accommodate development of 1,097,100 square feet of commercial office and retail floor area. The EIR addressed contained extensive analysis of several environmental issues, including: Traffic and circulation impacts due to the project's location on the northwestern Freeway (I-10) and the Devore Freeway (I-15); comer of the San Bernardino o.** Land use consistency with surrounding uses and existing on-site uses; and o:o The project's effect on the regional jobs and housing balance. JN 10-104043 · 32 · November 19, 2004 i City of Rancho Cucamonga Proposal for Can'ad Ranch EIR PROJECT EXPERIENCE SUMMARY The following is a summary of project background experience on environmental review projects California: Commercial, Industrial, and Office Projects · AAA Corporate Expansion Project, Costa Mesa (500,000 foot square expansion) · Cypress Business and Professional Center Specific Plan EIR, Cypress · Dominguez Hills Village Specific Plan EIR, Carson (100-acre residential/commercial) · Fair, Isaac Corporate Facility EIR, San Rafael (former PG&E coal site) · Gateway North Marketplace and Automall MND, Bermuda Dunes (1 million square feet) · Grand Canal EIR, Bakersfield (555,000-square-foot commercial center) · Hotel del Coronado Master Plan EIR, Coronado (renovation and expansion) · Irvine Business Complex Rezoning Project EIR (53 million square feet) · Llovio Ford Relocation ENFONSI, South Gate (HUD Section 108) · Ontado Gateway Plaza EIR, Ontario · Rialto Airport Master Plan and EIR, Rialto (5,000 acres) · Robinson Ranch North EIR, Yucaipa (700,000 foot commercial) square · Shaw Carpet Warehouse IS/MND, Cypress · Stonewood Shopping Center Specific Plan EIR, Downey · Vineyard Center Specific Plan EIR, Ontario Residential Projects · Alwin Development EIR, Oxnard (annexation project adjacent to airport) · Birch Hills Specific Plan EIR, Brea (186-acre residential/commercial project) · Buena Vista/Kem River Road EIR, Bakersfield (900-acre residential/commercial uses) · Bdght Development EIR, Turlock (residential and commercial) · Chapman Ranch Subsequent EIR, Yucaipa (1,029 acres, hillside grading) · Crafton Hills Specific Plan EIR, County of San Bernardino · Coto de Caza Addendum EIR, County of Orange · Del Sur Ranch EIR, Lancaster (project included a lake feature) · Long Point EiR, Rancho Palos Verdes (oceanfront mixed-use development) · Ocean Trails EIR, Rancho Palos Verdes (oceanfront golf and residential project) · Rifler Ranch Specific Plan EIR (10,500 acres; 50 million cubic yards of grading) · Sorrento Specific Plan EIR, Cypress (144-acre tank farm) · Whiteface Specific Plan EIR, Simi Valley (2,686 acres; hillside grading; wildlife corridors) · Willow Springs Specific Plan EIR, Kern County (45,000 acres) · Yucaipa Valley Acres EIR, County of San Bernardino Public Facilities and Institutional Projects · Seventh Day Adventist Church EIR, Trabuco Canyon · Alberhill Raceway and Entertainment Center EIR, Lake EIsinore · Cambria Fire Station EIR, Cambria Community Services District · Chino Hills Master Plans of Water Supply and Distribution Program /~.-. JN 10-104043 °33. November 19, 2004  City of Rancho Cucamonga Proposal for Carrad Ranch · Crown Valley Community Park IS/MNDs, Laguna Niguel · Escondido Center for Performing Arts EIR, Escondido · Fontana Municipal Golf Course IS/MND, Fontana · Garden of Champions Spods Complex EIR, Indian Wells · Golf Course EIR, Gilroy Municipal Gilroy · Mammoth Creek Park Facilities EIR, Mammoth Lakes · Palmdale Recreation Center EIR, Palmdale · Palmdale Sports Complex EIR, Palmdale · Police Headquarters and Fire Administration Facility EIR, Clovis · Remote Jail Feasibility Studies, County of Orange · Matin County Homeless Shelter EA/MND, U.S. Navy and Novato · Santa Ana River Crossing Environmental Baseline Survey, County of Orange (RBF staff) · St. Vibiana's Cathedral Historic De-listing and Demolition EIR, Los Angeles · Steele Canyon Country Club EIR, County of San Diego · University of California at Riverside Public Safety Building MND, Riverside Public Works Projects · Amargosa Creek Improvement Project EIR, Palmdale · Anaverde Detention Basin EIR, Palmdale · Calleguas Creek Improvement Project EIR, Camarillo · California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) District 8 On-call Environmental Services Contract · Cambda Wastewater Treatment Plant EIR, Cambda Community Services Distdct · Cambda Effluent and Disposal Pond EIR, Cambria CommunityServices Distdct · Cambria Desalination Facility EIR, Cambria Community Services Distdct · Cambria Groundwater Recharge EIR, Cambda Community Services Distdct · Chino Hills Master Plans of Water Supply and Distribution Program EIR, Chino · Hawthome Boulevard Redevelopment Plan and Specific Plan EIR, Lawndale · Highway49 Bypass Project IS, Amador County · Highway 111 Widening MND, Rancho Mirage · LOS Angeles River at Taylor Yard Study, City of Los Angeles Department of Public Works · Mahon Creek Enhancement EIR, San Rafael · Master Plans of Water, Sewer and Drainage Program EIR, Chino Hills · Moulton Parkway Smart Street Program EIR, County of Orange · Route 710 Urban Design Mitigation Report, Caltrans District 7 · Signal Hills Water System Mitigated Negative Declaration, Signal Hill Military Projects (multiple open-end contracts with U.S. Navy and U.S. Army Corp of Engineers [ACOE]) · Hamilton Air Force Base Community Reuse Plan ElS, Novato · LACDA Public Awareness Program, U.S. ACOE · Norco Bluffs Reconnaissance Study, U.S. ACOE · Prado Dam of Santa Aha Mainstem Engineering, U.S. ACOE · U.S. Navy Environmental Assessments (Southwest Division) · U.S. Navy Environmental Baseline Surveys JN 10-104043 -34. November 19, 2004  City of Rancho Cucamonga Proposal for Can'aH Ranch EIR - Oil Industry and Hazardous and Solid Waste (Specialists in Constrained Sites) · CAL-MRT Transfer Station EIR, Downey · Coachella Valley Recycling and Transfer Center IS/MND, Indio · Birch Hills Specific Plan EIR, Brea (Unocal fertilizer production facility) · East Fullerton Wetlands Monitoring, Chevron Production · Phase I Environmental Site Assessments (over 200 prepared or reviewed by RBF) · Signal Hill Petroleum Conditional Use Permit Mitigated Negative Declaration, Signal Hill · Solid Waste Management Plan EIR, Palmdale · Sorrento Planned Development EIR, Cypress (former Texaco Tank Farm) · Towne Center Phase II EIR, South Gate (former World Oil storage terminal) BONTERRA CONSULTING (Subconsultant) BonTerra Consulting is an environmental planning and natural resources management corporation serving public and pdvate sector clients throughout southem and central Califomia. The three principals of the firm have over 56 years of collective, hands-on experience in environmental planning, impact assessment, natural resources management, a.nd city and regional planning studies for local, state, and federal agencies and private-sector clients, including developers of new community, architects, .engineers, universities, and aerospace, telecommunications, and waste management organizations. Typical project experience includes master-planned communities; parks, golf courses, and recreational facilities; entertainment theme parks; urban infrastructure systems such as transportation corridors, highways, and bddges, airports, landfills, matedal recovery facilities (MRFs), and wastewater and water supply facilities; and urban in-fill projects, including office complexes, mixed-use employment and retail business parks, and commercial/retail centers. BonTerra Consulting has the technical background, experience, and necessary permits to provide biological services for both public-and private-sector clients throughout southern and central California. Our ecologists have the technical expertise to conduct sensitive-species surveys, resource agency permitting, biological assessments, and constraints analysis, CEQA and NEPA documentation, construction monitoring, and other biological services. CRM TECH (Subconsultant) CRM Tech is a full-service cultural resource management company. Bruce Love, principal, has been active in archaeological projects in southern and eastern California. In 1987, after five years working as an archaeologist for various CRM companies, Mr. Love formed his own company in Palmdale, California, working principally in northern Los Angeles County and eastern Kem County. In 1990, Mr. Love took the position of Director of the Archaeological Research Unit (ARU) at the University of California, Riverside. He ran the ARU and the Eastern Information Center for three years, working principally in Riverside County. In 1993, Mr. Love left the University and once again formed his own company, creating a new firm dedicated to a broad interpretation of cultural resources throughout southern and eastern Califomia, and providing a range of services not typically found within a single company. ON 10-104043 ·35· November 19, 2004  City of Rancho Cucarnonga Proposal for Carrari Ranch EIR STANLEY R. HOFFMAN ASSOCIATES (Subconsultant) Stanley R. Hoffman Associates (SRHA) is a professional consulting corporation established in 1981. The firm provides economic analysis, fiscal and financial analysis, and real estate market research for the public and pdvate sectors. Services are designed to meet a variety of client needs, ranging from overall market assessments to the details of site-specific development analysis. SRHA provides innovative solutions for the specific requirements of each client. Services are provided individually and in cooperation with project teams in a variety of planning situations, including preparation of specific plans, redevelopment plans, general and plans amendments; annexation and incorporation studies; development agreements; impact fee analyses; and environmental impact reports. SRHA has two offices in California: Los Angeles and Alameda. Economic Analysis. Consulting services are provided in the formulation of economic development policies and strategies. Specific areas of emphasis are: · General Plan economic policies and programs · Economic development strategies · Retail impact analysis · Downtown revitalization studies Fiscal and Financial Analysis. Information is provided on cost and benefit consequences of land use and infrastructure changes to cities and counties. Means are determined for funding public infrastructure improvements required for development. Areas of concentration are: · Fiscal impact analysis · Development impact feestudies · Capitalfinancing evaluations Real Estate Market Research. Decision relevant information on development opportunities is provided for overall market evaluations and site-specific assessments. Techniques include: · Land use market absorption · Financial pro formas · Market feasibility assessments Annexations and Incorporations. Fiscal impact and plan of services studies are prepared for proposed jurisdictional boundary changes, including: · Annexations · Incorporations · Growth management phasing plans JN 10-104043 · 36 · November 19, 2004 m  City of Rancho Cucamonga m Proposal for CarraH Ranch FIR m v. REFERENCES RBF Client references are provided below. Additional references are available upon request. Mr. Jeff Bloom m Community Development Director CITY OF UPLAND 460 N. Euclid Avenue m Upland, California 909.931.4130 m Mr. Brian Ludicke Community Development Director CITY OF LANCASTER 44933 North Fern Avenue m Palmdale, California 93534661.723.6100 Ms. Karen Johnston Depubj City Manager m TOWN OF MAMMOTH LAKES 437 Old Mammoth Road Mammoth Lakes, California 93546 m 760.934.8989 Mr. Joel Rojas mCommunity Development Director CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES 30940 Hawthorne Boulevard m Rancho Palos Verdes, California 90275 310.544.5228 Mr. Larry Stevens m Planning Director CITY OF SAN DIMAS 245 East Bonita Avenue I San Dimas, California 91773 909.394.6250 Mr. John McMains m Community Development Director CITY OF YUCAIPA 34272 Yucaipa Boulevard m Yucaipa, California 92399 909.797.2489 m November 19, 2004 JN 10-104043 i  City of Rancho Cucamonga i Proposal for Carrari Ranch EIR. I VI. ORGANIZATIONAL CHART I CITY OF I RANCHO i CUCAMONGA , I Glenn LaJole, A.I.C.P. Project Manager I I I I Eddie Torres, I.N.C.E. BonTerm Consulting Air and Noise Analysis Biological Analysis Mike Harden CRM Tech Environmental Analysis Cultural Resources Analysis I Rlta Garcla Stanley R. Hoffman Associates Environmental Analysis Fiscal Analysis I Rebecca Kinney, P.E. Water Resources Analysis I Bob Matson Transportation Analysis John Andrew, R.LA. I Landscape Architecture Steve BelA, P.E. I GIS I JN 10-104043 °38° November 19, 2004 !  City of Rancho Cucamonga I Proposal for Can'ar] Ranch EIR VII. PROJECT TEAM I The following are brief background descriptions for the key professionals who would be responsible for preparing the Carrad Ranch EIR. The percentage of hours of each staff member and individual tasks are included in the Fee Summary (under separate submittal). I Gary Armstrong, A.I.C.P. Project Assignment: Principal-In-Charge i Gary Armstrong oversees a staff of 50 professionals in planning, urban design, landscape architecture, and land development. Mr. Armstrong's major focus is project management for the development of master-planned communities from the site acquisition feasibility stage, on through i design, processing of entitlement to use, and coordination of engineering design through construction. RBF project coordination and development services under Mr. Armstrong's direction are tailored to the needs ofeach client and the complexityof each project. Since joining the firrn in i 1979, he has been involved in the design, approval, and implementation of literally thousands of dwelling units and numerous commercial, industrial, and utility facilities for both pdvate and public clients. He has had considerable experience in negotiating exactions with jurisdictional agencies and the legalities involved throughout the development process. Mr. Armstrong served as Project I Director for the 23,000 acre Otay Ranch project, which involved extensive coordination. agency Glenn Lajoie, A.I.C.P. I Project Assignment: Project Director Glenn Lajoie has a B.A. degree in Geography and a Masters in Public Policy Administration from California State University, Long Beach. Mr. Lajoie recently served as Section Director for the Amedcan Planning Association, Orange Section. Mr. Lajoie's responsibilities include the coordination, production and presentation of Environmental Impact Reports (EIR) and other related i planning documents including Area Plans, Specific Plans, Initial Studies, and Environmental Assessments for commercial projects and private entitlement applications. Mr. Lajoie has been responsible for CEQA Compliance documentation for numerous controversial projects which include: the Grand Canal Entertainment Center Project EIR, which is a 555,000 square foot facility in i Bakersfield; the Alberhill Sports and Entertainment Center EIR in Lake Elsinore; four recent environmental documents in the City of Cypress which involved substantial land use compatibility analyses with nearby sensitive receptors; the Escondido Performing and Fine Arts Center EIR for I Escondido; the Native Sun Residential Project EIR in Escondid0 (which included an unsuccessful court challenge); six General Plan AmendmentJAnnexation EIRs for twenty-two residential and commercial projects in the City of Lancaster; the Oleander Specific Plan and Program EIR for a i 1,500-acre Industrial Center in the City of Moreno Valley; the 2,500-acre South Ranch portion of Coto de Caza which is a Master Planned Community located in Southern Orange County. Mr. Lajoie currently serves as Project Manager for the Marymount College Expansion EIR in Rancho i Palos Verdes and managed the Robinson Ranch North EIR in Yucaipa, the North Village Specific Plan EIR in Mammoth Lakes and the Long Point EIR in Rancho Palos Verdes. Michael Harden I Project Assignment: Environmental Analyst and Coordinator Project Mike Harden graduated from the University of California, Santa Barbara, with a Bachelor of Arts i Degree in Environmental Studies. In his responsibilities as an Environmental Analyst, Mr. Harden prepares coordinates environmental studies and documents prepared in accordance with the I JN 10-104043 · 39. Novem bar 1 9, 2004  City of Rancho Cucamonga Proposal for CarraH Ranch EIR . development projects, state-of-the-art visual analyses, facility siting and due diligence studies, and technical support for the California Energy Commission facility siting process. Mr. Torres has experience with noise monitoring using Type I rated instruments, as well as sophisticated noise modeling using FHWA-RD-77-108, SOUND2000 and Traffic Noise Model 2.0. Mr. Torres also can spectragraphs utilizing the Larson Davis Data Noise Analysis provide full-range noise measurement software (DNA). Additionally, he provides air quality studies for virtually all of his CEQA/NEPA documents, having experience with 24-hour carbon monoxide monitoring (using digital and analog measurement systems), as well as pollutant modeling using URBEMIS2002, CALINE4, and EMFAC2002. Mr. Torres has the ability to implement a full analysis methodology per the guidelines of the Environmental Protection Agency, The California Air Resources Board, The Air Pollution Control District and Air Quality Management District, and Caltrans/Federal Highway Administration. Bob Matson Project Assignment: Transportation Planner Mr. Matson has managed and prepared over 50 traffic impact studies for planning and environmental projects. He is a Board Member of Spectrumotion Transportation Management Association, and holds certificates in Fundamentals of Traffic Engineering, Congestion Mitigation, Managing Traffic Growth on Urban Streets, and Urban Street Design, all from the University of Califomia Institute of Transportation Studies. Mr. Matson has prepared traffic impact studies for the U.S. Navy San Mateo and Bayview Housing Projects, a multiplex theatre and restaurant (1,700 seats, City of Downey), the Westpark Planned Community (3,800 units, City of Irvine), the John Wayne Airport Expansion, the Newport Ridge Planned Community (2,500 homes in Newport Beach), the El Sobrante Landfill Expansion (Riverside County), the Mission Oaks Business Park (Camadllo), the Northwood Planned Community (3,000 units in Irvine), and the Southern California Veterans Home (Barstow). Mr. Mataon will prepare the project traffic impact analysis for incorporation into the EIR. Rebecca Kinney, P,E, Project Assignment: Hydrology Ms. Kinney has many years of experience in all phases of stormwater management projects including planning, design, and construction. Her recent experience has focused on development of Master Plans of Drainage, which focus on hydrology, storm drainage facility sizing, stormwater NPDES compliance, stream stability, and floodplain management. Ms. Kinney also has experience in floodplain management, including revisions to development codes. She is also experienced in channel restoration design work, including hydrologic and hydraulic modeling and PS&E work. Ms. Kinney has served as a regulatory agent for permit applications 404 (ACOE), 401 (California Regional Water Quality Control Board), and 1601/1603 (California of Department of Fish and Game). She received wetland delineation training by the Wetland Training Institute. Her knowledge of both engineering and environmental requirements makes her an asset to any multidisciplinary team. Steve Bein, P,E, Project Assignment: GIS (Fire Response Time Analysis) Steve Bein's project experience includes geographic information systems (GIS) analysis; civil and transportation engineering; master planning, needs analysis, database design, system specification and selection, training, and operation. Mr. Bein has applied his talents to the development of computer-aided engineering applications, facilities management, and spatial information systems. His experience makes him an ideal candidate for any project team proposing the manipulation and ~,~1, JN 10-104043 .41 · November 19, 2004 i C~ of Rancho Cucamonga Proposal for Carrad Ranch EIR - analysis of spatial data. Mr. Bein manages projects utilizing many GIS systems, including AutoCAD, ArcGIS, Arolnfo, and Intergraph Microstation. In addition to his experience in GIS and CADD, Mr. Bein is a registered Civil Engineer with experience in transportation engineering, subdivision design, and water resources engineering. Mr. Bein worked in a consultant training program for one year at Caltrans Distdct 12 performing highway design CAD He on an Intergraph system. is also a specialist in hydrology and hydraulics engineering and has developed many of the computerized routines used for such analysis at RBF. John Andrew, R.L.A. Project Assignment: Wildland Fire Interface and Fuel Modification Analysis John Andrew is the manager of the landscape architecture design group at RBF. For the past 15 years he has been responsible for the management and design of over 100 hundred public works and transportation projects throughout California, Arizona, and Nevada, with a cumulative construction value in the millions of dollars. He has completed projects for state, county, and city governments involving decorative architectural treatments as well as landscaping and irrigation systems. Projects have been for scenic highway corridors, freeway interchanges, parkways and quality basins, and erosion control projects. He has medians for arterial and public streets, water conducted community workshops, made public presentations, prepared conceptual landscape plans and computer-generated photo-realistic "before and after" renderings, and completed final landscape and irrigation construction plans. Ann Johnston (BonTerra Consulting) Project Assignment: Biological Services Project Manager Ms. Johnston is the Manager of Biological Services, with approximately 12 years of experience in sensitive biological resource inventories, endangered species surveys, general wildlife and plant biology, mitigation monitoring, and habitat evaluations. Ms. Johnston's professional experience has focused on integrating biological data, particularly data on sensitive species, into environmental documentation (California Environmental Quality Act, National Environmental Policy Act, and Species Act). managed and/or authored the biological resources Federal Endangered She has sections of more than 35 Environmental Impact Reports and more than 200 separate biological reports, including Biological Assessments (pursuant to Section 7 and 10 consultations with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service [USFWS]), Natural Environment Studies (pursuant to Caltrans guidelines), focused surveys for sensitive species, tree reports, resource management plans, mitigation monitoring reports, and general biological assessments and constraints analyses. Ms. Johnston is also permitted to conduct surveys for the federally listed threatened coastal Califomia gnatcatcher (Polioptila califomica cafifomica) (USFWS Permit number 821963). i Bruce Love (CRM Tech) Project Assignment: Cultural Resources CRM Tech is a full service cultural resources management company. Mr. Love, principal, has been archaeological projects and eastern California. In 1987, after five years active in in southern working as an archaeologist for various cultural resources management companies, Mr. Love formed his own company in Palmdale, Califomia, working principally in northern Los Angeles County and eastem Kem County. In 1990, Mr. Love took the position of Director of the Archaeological Research Unit (ARU) at University of California, Riverside. He ran the ARU and the Eastern Information Center for three years, working principally in Riverside County. In 1993, Mr. Love left the university and once again formed his own company, creating a new firm dedicated to a broad JN 10-104043 .42- November 19, 2004  City of Rancho Cucamonga Proposal for Can*aH Ranch EIR - interpretation of cultural resources throughout southern and eastern Califomia, providing a range of services not typically found within a single company. Stanley R, Hoffman (Stanley R. Hoffman Associates) Project Assignment: Fiscal Analysis Stanley R. Hoffman has over thirty years of experience in of fiscal and financial analysis, economic and demographic studies, land use projections, real estate market research, and computer-based financial modeling. He has managed major programs in both the public and pdvate sectors, involving numerous presentations before political and academic bodies and professional audiences. Mr. Hoffman has extensive experience in preparing financing studies and development fee impact programs. He has worked on establishing Mello-Roos Community Facilities Districts and special assessment districts. These programs cover a wide range of land development and phasing pattems and facilities including transportation, streetscapes, drainage, wastewater, fire equipment, stations and other infrastructure. He is responsible for the company's copyrighted fiscal impact models being utilized in several cities and counties in Califomia. The models are tailored to the unique characteristics of each jurisdiction and are designed to project revenues and costs associated with future development under specific assumptions about land use, phasing, and infrastructure requirements. Since establishing Stanley R. Hoffman Associates in January 1981, Mr. Hoffman has specialized in fiscal and economic impact studies and on market feasibility studies for residential, office, major retail shopping centers, and office and hotel projects. These studies have been prepared for many clients, including cities, counties, redevelopment agencies, other public agencies, and developers. Major fiscal and financial analyses have included large-scale, mixed-use land developments in many jurisdictions throughout California.  City of Rancho Cucamonga Proposal for Can*ad Ranch EIR - VIII. L AB L TY INSURANCE RBF has general liability insurance in the amount of $4,000,000. RBF's professional liability (errors and omissions) coverage amounts to $3,000,000. RBF also carries automobile liability, excess liability, worker's compensation, and employer's liability insurance. Further information and/or certificates of insurance will be provided by RBF, as requested by the City. JN 10-104043 -44° November 19, 2004  City of Rancho Cucamonga Proposal for Can'aH Ranch EIR . X. BUDGET 1.3 ~e~ Co~J~a~(~ 4 ~,~ z2 ~ F~; 2.e ~e~ ~ 24 ~ H,~ ~owmber ~, 2004 ~0-~04043 R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPART~IENT Staff Report DATE: February 2, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Cindy Hackett, Associate Engineer~X Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Technician~¢//1) SUBJECT: ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED AND AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $252,777.40 TO THE APPARENT LOW BIDDER, SILVIA CONSTRUCTION, INC., AND AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF A 10% CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,277.74 FOR THE HERMOSA AVENUE STREET WIDENING AND PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM HIGHLAND AVENUE TO BANYAN STREET, TO BE FUNDED FROM MEASURE I FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO. 11763035650/1299176.0 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $252,777.40 to the apparent Iow bidder, Silvia Construction, Inc., and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $25,277.74, for the Hermosa Avenue Street Widening and Pavement Rehabilitation from Highland Avenue to Banyan Street, to be funded from Measure I funds, Account No. 11763035650/1299176-0. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on January 11, 2005, for the subject project. The Engineer's estimate was $252,945.00. Staff has reviewed ail bids received and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements with any irregularities to be inconsequential. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Accept Bids Received and Award Hermosa Avenue Street Widening and Pavement Rehab. February 2, 2005 Page 2 The construction of this project is to construct street widening and pavement rehabilitation including grading, cold milling, adjusting all utilities to new grade, installing a new concrete curb and gutter, retaining curb, sidewalk, driveways, asphalt concrete pavement, and asphalt rubber hot mix overlay. The contract documents call for thirty (30) working days to complete this construction. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:CH/RO:Is Attachment BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING JANUARY 11, 2005 A~t'ARE~¥rLOWaWOER Hermosa Avenue Street Widening and Pavement Rehabilitation from ENGINEERS COST Silvia Construction, Highland Avenue to Banyan Street ESTIMATE Inc. Ail American Asphalt UNIT UNIT UNIT NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT 1. LS Clear & Grub, Incl removals, reloc exist tree and/or $10,000.00 $18,262.00 $10,779.50 mobilization $10,000.00 $18,262.00 $10,779.50 2. 1 LS Unclassified excavation/fill, disposal and grading $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $18,250.00 $15,250.00 $40,000.00[ $40,000.00 3. 2050 TONS Crushed Aggregate $20.00 $41,000.00 $17.50 $35,875.00 $18.00 $36,900.00 4. 950 TONS Asphalt Concrete Pavement $40.00 $38,000.00 $44.00 $41,800,0(2 $40,00 $38,000,00 5. 2890 SY Cold Plane, 0' - 0.12' Variable Depth per plan $1.50 $4,335.00 $2.06[ $5,953.40 $0.85 $2,456.50 6. 3 EA Adjust Manhole Frame & Cover to Finish Grade $300.00 $900.00 $630.00 $1,890.00 $250.00 $750.00 7. 4 EA Adjust Water Valve Box & Cover to Grade $200.00 $800.0c $110.00 $440.00 $185.00 $740.0c 8. 1500 TONS Asphalt Rubber Hot Mix, incl pavement prep, routing $60.00 $56.70 & crack seal $90,000,00 $85,050.00 $54.00 $81,000,0(2 9. 426 LF 8" P.C.C. Curb & 94" Gutter $30.00] $12,780.00 $20.00 $8,520.00 $19.00 $8,094.00 10. 2350 SF 4" P.C.C. Sidewalk, per Std. Dwg. No. 101 & 103 $4.00 $9,400.00 $4.50 $1o,575.00 $4.00 $9,400.00 11. 510 SF Driveway Approach, per Std. Dwg. No. 101 $8.00 $4,080.00 $7.20 $3,672.00 $5.00 $2,550.00 12. 245 LF Const retaining curb, varies height 0'-l.S' to match exist grade $40.00 $9,800.00 $10.00 $2,450.0(2 $7.00 $1,715.00 13. 170 SF Remove existing dirt and construct 4" D.G. sidewalk $5.00 $850.00 $5.00 $850.ot $1.50 $285.00 14. 1 LS Remove, install wood fence, paint to match exist in kind or re-use exist if possible $2.000.00 $2,000.0c $3,075.00 $3,075.00 $5,100.00 $5,100.00 15. 1 LS Traffic Control $6,0oo.0o $6,000.00 $5,875.00 $5,875.00 $11,000.00 $11,000.00 16. 1 LS Traffic Signage, Striping and Pavement Markings per plan, complete in place Si0,000.00 $10,000.00 $9,200.00 $9,200.00 $9,000.00 $9,000.0c 17. 2 EA Install construction signs $1,500.00 $3,000.00 $520.00 $1,040.00 $350.00] $700,00 ~. Page 1 TOTAL I $252,945.00 I $252,777.40 $258,440.00 BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING JANUARY 11~ 2005 Hermosa Avenue Street Widening and Pavement Rehabilitation from Laird Construction Highland Avenue to Banyan Street Ranco Corporation Gentry Brothers, Inc. Co., Inc. UNIT UNIT UNIT NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOIJNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT 1. ~, kS Clear & Grub, Incl removals, reloc exist tree and/or I $15,000.00 mobilization $29,000.00 $29,000.00 $15,000.0c $7,500.00! $7,500.00 2. 1 LS Unclassified excavation/fill, disposal and grading $25,500.00 $25,500.00 $58,000.00 $58,000.00 $35,000.00 $35,000.00 3. 2050 TONS Crushed Aggregate $20.00 $41,000.00 $15.00 $30,750.00 $20.00 $41,000.00 4. 950 TONS Asphalt Concrete Pavement $45.00 $42,750.00 $42.00 $39,900.00 $45.00 $42,750.00 5. 2890 SY Cold Plane, 0' - 0.12' Variable Depth per plan $2.00 $5,780.00 $2.00 $5,780.00 $3.25 $9,392.50 6. 3, EA Adjust Manhole Frame & Cover to Finish Grade $500.00 $1,500.0c $300.00 $900.00 $680.00 $1,950.00 7. 4 EA Adjust Water Valve Box & Cover to Grade $275.00 $1,100.00 $25.00 $100.00 $50.00 $200.00 8 1500 TONS Asphalt Rubber Hot Mix, incl pavement prep, routing $52.0o $58.25 & crack seal $78,000.00 $58.00 $87,000.0C $87,375.00 9. 426 LF 8' P.C.C. Curb & 24" Gutter $20.00 $8,520.00 $14.00 $5,964.00 $32.50 $13,845.00 10. 2350 SF 4" P.C.C. Sidewalk, per Std. Dwg. No. 101 & 103 $4.00 $9,400.00 $2.50 $5,875.00 $4.25 $9,987.50 ~1. 510 SE Driveway Approach, per Std. Dwg. No. 101 $6.00 $3,060.00 $3.00 $1,530.00 $s.25 $4,207.5c 12. 245 L~ Const retaining curb, varies height 0'-1.5' to match exist grade $17.00 $4,165.00 $14.00 $3,430.00 $20.00 $4,900.00 ~3 170 SE Remove existing dirt and construct 4" D.G. sidewalk $6.00 $1,020.00 $3.50 $595.00 $15,00 $2,550.00 ~4. 1 kS Remove, install wood fence, paint to match exist in kind or re-use exist if possible $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $600.00 $600.00 $5,000.00 $5.000.00 15. 1 LS Traffic Control $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.0c $5,000.00 $5,000.00 16. LS Traffic Signage, Striping and Pavement Markings per $8,000.00 $12,000.00 plan, complete in place $8,000.00 $12,000.013 $21,734.50 $21,734.50 17. 2 EA Install construction signs $700.00 $1,400.00 $400.00 $800.00 $500.00 $1,000.00 ~,~ Page 2 TOTAL $271,695.00 I $273,224.00 $293,392.00 BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING JANUARY 11, 2005 Hermosa Avenue Street Widening and Pavement Rehabilitation from Tyner Paving Sully-Miller Highland Avenue to Banyan Street Company ~equel Contractors, Inc Contracting Company UNIT UNIT UNIT NO (~TY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT 1. 1 LS Clear & Grub, Incl removals, reloc exist tree and/or $30,000.oo $11,624.00 $38,000.00 mobilization $5o,ooo.oo $1 1,624.00 $38,000.00 2. ~ LS Unclassified excavation/fill, disposal and grading $30,460.00 $30,460.00 $47,000.00 $47,000.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.0c 3. 2050 TONS Crushed Aggregate $14.25 $29,212.50 $20.50 $42,025.00 $17.00 $34,850.00 4. 95~ TONS Asphalt Concrete Pavement $49.49 $47,015.50 $46.00 $43,700.00 $43.00 $40,850.00 5. 2890 SY Cold Plane, 0' - 0.12' Variable Depth per plan $3.28 $9,479.20 $3.30 $9,537.0c $3.30 $9,537.00 6 3 EA Adjust Manhole Frame & Cover to Finish Grade $750.00 $2,250.00 $700.00 $2,1o0.00 $600.00 $1,800.00 7. 4 EA Adjust Water Valve Box & Cover to Grade $150.00 $600.00 $200.00[ $800.00 $160.00 $640.00 8. 1500 TONS Asphalt Rubber Hot Mix, incl pavement prep, routing & crack seal $66.47 $99,705.00 $57,00 $85,500.00 $59.00 $88,500.00 9. 426 LF 8" P.C.C. Curb & 24" Gutter $23.00 $9,798.0c $18.00 $7,668.00 $25.00 $10,650.00 10. 235( SF 4" P.C.C. Sidewalk, per Std. Dwg. No. 101 & 103 $3.66 $8,601.00 $3.40 $7,990.00 $3.25 $7,637.50 1. 5~0 SF Driveway Approach, per Std. Dwg. No. 101 $4.15 ' $2,116.50 $3.50 $l,785.00 $6.25 $3,187.50 12. 245 LF Const retaining curb, varies height 0'-1.5' to match exist grade $35.00 $8,575,00 $23,00 $5,635.00 $24.00 $5,880.00 13. 170 SF Remove existing dirt and construct 4" D.G. sidewalk $6.00 $1,020.00 $14.00 $2,380.0G $2.00 $340.00 ~4. LS Remove, install wood fence, paint to match exist m $1,850.00 $2,000.00 kind or re-use exist if possible $1,850.00 $2,000.00 $2,600.00 $2,600.00 ~5. ~ kS Traffic Control $2,250.00 $2,250.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $9,000.00 $9,000.00 ~6. ~ kS Traffic Signage, Striping and Pavement Markings per plan, complete in place $9,928.00 $9,928.0/2 $9,500.00 $9,500.00 $I1,000.00 $11,000.00 17. 2 EA Install construction signs $800.00 $1,600.00 $500.00 $1,000.00 $800.00 $1,600.00 ~ Page3 TOTAL I5294,460.70 $295,244.00 [ $296,072.0(1 BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING JANUARY 11, 2005 Hermosa Avenue Street Widening and Pavement Rehabilitation from E.G.N. Construction, Highland Avenue to Ban.~,an Street Inc. R.J. Noble Corn a_.~p_~y_ Matich Corporation ----~- UNIT UNIT I UNIT I NO /~,TY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST , AMOUNT COST J AMOUNT COST i AMOoNT 1. 1 LS Clear & Grub, Incl removals, reloc exist tree and/or mobilization $12,480.00 $12,480.0G $28,800.00! $28,800.00 $61,326.00 $61,326.00 2. 4 kS Unclassified excavation/fill, disposal and grading $21,000.00 $21,000.00 $46,000.00 $46,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 3, 2050 TONS Crushed Aggregate $19.75 $40,487.50 $17.00[ $34,850,0G $16.00 $32,800.00 4. 950 TONS Asphalt Concrete Pavement $51.50 $48,925.00 $47.00 $44,680.00 $53.00 $50,350.00 5. 2890 SY Cold Plane, O' - 0.12' Variable Depth per plan $4.35 $12,571.50 $3.25 $9,392.50 $3.00 $8,670.0G 6. 3 EA Adjust Manhole Frame & Cover to Finish Grade $1,000.00 $3,000.00 $630.00 $1,890.00 $1,100.00 $3,300.00 7. 4 EA Adjust Water Valve Box & Cover to Grade $100.00 $400.00 $110.00 $440.00 $250.00 $1,000.00 8. 1500 TONS Asphalt Rubber Hot Mix, incl pavement prep, routing & crack seal $74.501 $111,750.00 $54.00 $81,000.00 $70.00 $105,000.00 9. 426 LF 8" P.C.C. Curb & 24" Gutter $23.00 $9,798.00 $24.00 $10,224.00 $27.00 $11,502.00 10. 2350 SF 4" P.C.C. Sidewalk, per Std. Dwg. No. 101 & 103 $4.50 $1o,575.00 $4.35 $10,222.5G $3.50 $8,225.00 II. 51C SF Driveway Approach, per Std. Dwg. No. 101 $5.00 $2,550.00 $11.85 $6,043.50 $8.75 $4,462.50 12. 245 LF Const retaining curb, varies height 0'-1.5' to match exist grade $28.0O $6,860.00 $24,00 $5,880.00 $38.00 $9,310.0G 13. 470 SF Remove existing dirt and construct 4" D.G. sidewalk $10.00 $1,700.00 $12.00 $2,040.00 $7.25 $1,232.50 14. 4 kS Remove, install wood fence, pmnt to match exist in kind or re-use exist if possible $2,300.00 $2,300.00 $5,400.00 $5,400.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 15. LS Traffic Control $3,s00.00 $3,500.00 $14,500.00 $14,500.00 $6,600.00 $6,600.00 46. 1 LS Traffic Signage, Striping and Pavement Markings per plan, complete in place $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $12,000.00 $12,000.00 ~7. 2 EA Install construction signs $750.00 $1,500.00 $525.0G $1,050.00 $775.0( $1,550.00 · ~ Page 4 TOTAL I [ $299,397.00 I $312,382.50 $328,328.00 HERMOSA AVENUE STREET ~IDENING AND PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM HIGHLAND AVENUE TO BANYAN STREET 24TH ST 6TH ST 4TH ST ~ A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT StaffR l rt DA'rE: February 2, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O Ne'l, C'ty Engineer BY: Tasha Hunter, Public Service Tech I SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR TRACT 16157, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF CHURCH STREET AND TERRA VISTA PARKWAY, SUBMITTED BY CONCOURS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC AND LDC COUGAR, LLC RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSI~ Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract 16157 were approved by the City Council on December 12~17-03, in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $237,000.00 Labor and Material Bond: $118,500.00 Due to the size of the project, 503 units total, the project is not expected to be completed until December 2005. The developer Concours Development Company, LLC and LDC Courgar, LLC, is requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's office. Respectively submitted, , Williarfl J. 0 Noil City Engineer WJO:TCH:dlw Attachments s/~partm~nt Communi~ LEWIS APARTMENT 'CO~UN~TIES Janua~ 1 I, 2005 Engin~ng DepaAment C~ OF ~NCHO CUC~ONGA 10500 C~ic Center DHve Ran~o CU~monga, CA 91729 RE: ~uest for Pete E~ension ROW2003~1601 Pubric Improvement for T~ck 16157 Homecoming at Te~a Vista 116~0 Church Str~l Dear Sir or Madam: Due to ~e size of ~e project (503 uni~ total in this permit application), ~e pmje~ is not expected ~ be ~mplel~ until De. tuber 2005. We hereby r~uest a one year e=ension on ~e Public Implement pe~ ROW2003~1601. ~ank ~u for your time and ~n~m, ~sis~nt Project Manager Le~s ~a~ment Communities FOR CONDOMINI~ PUI~POSES SITE UTIX,IZA~ON A~ TENTATIVE TRAC~ NO. 16157 ~HOMEO '- I}@ TERRA VISTA ~ '"x, .__. RANCHO CUCAMOMGA, CA. ~ ~ A-62 (SU-I RESOLUTION NO. 05 -' ~),~J~' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 16157 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on February 2, 2005, by Concours Development Company, LLC and LDC Cougar, LLC, as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located at the northwest corner of Church Street and Terra Vista Parkway; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Tract 16157; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A E N O I N E E R I N O D E P A RT M E N T Staff:Report DATE: February 2, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Tasha Hunter, Public Service Tech I SUBJECT: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR CUP96-14, LOCATED WITHIN TERRA VISTA PROMENADE SHOPPING CENTER ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, WEST OF ROCHESTER AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY LEWIS DEVELOPMENT CO. RECOMMENDATION: The required improvements for CUP96-14 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: As a condition of approval of completion of CUP96-14, located within Terre Vista Promenade Shopping Center on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, west of Rochester Avenue, the applicant was required to complete street improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City Council release the existing Faithful Performance Bond and file a Notice of Completion. Developer: Lewis Development Co. Release: Faithful Performance Bond ff435126S $100,000.00 (Bond No.) Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:TCH Attachment(s) //5' Vicinity Map City of Rancho Cucamonga N $ CUP 96-14 //~, RESOLUTION NO. Cji" t0,~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR CUP96-14 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for CUP96-14 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. II1 R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A E N G I N E E R I N G D E P A R T M E N T Slaff Report DAT~: February 2, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Tasha Hunter, Public Service Tech I SUBJECT: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR CUP97-32, LOCATED AT 9146 9TM STREET, SUBMITTED BY DAVID RECOMMENDATION: The required improvements for CUP97-32 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithfu~ Pedormance Bond. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: As a condition of approval of completion of CUP97-32, located at 9146 9~' Street, the applicant was required to complete street improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City Council release the existing Faithful Performance Bond and file a Notice of Completion. Developer: David L. Manwarren Corporation Release: Faithful Performance Bond #SD00076535 $10,975.00 (Bond No.) Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:TCH Attachment(s) ~,~,~;~ ~UL Cl"( II ,,w-u,o,~ u.I LEON ARROW PROJECT LOCATION NINTH FLOWER LION Z r'~ RD. ~,"r. LEI -r- CTI'T Ol" I(AHC'IIO CUCAI~'IOFICA CO UH'I'T gl,' 5,~kFI I]I,~I(FIAi(DIFIO 5'1','\'1'1'~ L)I" CAI~II"Oi(FIIA RESOLUTION NO. ~,,~" ~,~'7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR CUP97-32 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for CUP97-32 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San IBernardino County. R A C H O C U C A M O N G A E N G I N E E R I N G D E P A R T M E N T Staff Report DATE: February 2, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Tasha Hunter, Public Service Tech I SUBJECT: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE ALL BONDS AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR88-11, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF VINEYARD AVENUE AND SAN BERNARDINO ROAD, SUBMITTED BY EDWARD R. COMBS RECOMMENDATION: The required improvements for DR88-11 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release all Bonds. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: As a condition of approval of completion of DR88-11, located on the southwest corner of Vineyard Avenue and San Bernardino Road, the applicant was required to complete street improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City Council release all existing Bonds and file a Notice of Completion. Developer: Edward R. Combs Release: All Bonds Respectfully submitted, Willi~im J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:TCH Attachment(s) Vicinity Map City of Rancho Cucamonga N S DR 88-11 /;z.Z RESOLUTION NO. ~ 5 - 0 ~ ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR88-11 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for DR88-11 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A E N G I N E E R I N G D E P A R T M E N T Staff Report DATE: February 2, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Tasha Hunter, Public Service Tech I SUBJECT: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE ALL BONDS AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR93-05, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ARROW ROUTE, APPROXIMATELY 800 FEET EAST OF MILLIKEN AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY LEE & STIRES, INC. RECOMMENDATION: The required improvements for DR93-05 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release all Bonds. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: As a condition of approval of completion of DR93-05, located on the north side of Arrow Route, approximately 800 feet east of Milliken Avenue, the applicant was required to complete street improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City Council release all existing Bonds and file a Notice of Completion. Developer: Lee & Stires, Inc. Release: All Bonds Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:TCH Attachment(s) Vicinity Map City of Rancho Cucamonga $ DR 93-05 RESOLUTION NO. (~,.~-_~.~4~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR93-05 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for DR93-05 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A E N G I N E E R I N G D E P A R T M E N T Staff Report DATE: February 2, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Tasha Hunter, Public Service Tech I SUBJECr: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE ALL BONDS AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR99~52, LOCATED ON AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAN MARINO STREET AND CHARLES SMITH AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY OLTMANS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY RECOMMENDATION: The required improvements for DR99-52 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release all Bonds. BACKGROUND/ANALYSiS: As a condition of approval of completion of DR99-52, located at the southwest corner of San Marino Street and Charles Smith Avenue, the applicant was required to complete street improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City Council release all existing Bonds and file a Notice of Completion. Developer: OItmans Construction Company Release: All Bonds Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:TCH Attachment(s) Vicinity Map City of Rancho Cucamonga 4TH N $ DR 99-52 RESOLUTION NO. ~5 - ~/"//~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR99-52 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for DR99-52 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A E N g I N E E R I N O D E P A R r M E N r Staff Report DATE: February 2, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Tasha Hunter, Public Svc. Tech I SUBdECT: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE CASH DEPOSIT FOR DR99-53, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ANAHEIM PLACE AND AZUSA COURT, SUBMITTED BY FAIRWAY BUSINESS CENTRE, LLC RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee cash deposit, for DR99-53, located on the west side of Anaheim Place and Azusa Court, submitted by Fairway Business Centre, LLC BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The required one-year maintenance period has ended, and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. DEVELOPER Fairway Business Centre, LLC 1711 Westcliff Drive Newport Beach, Ca 92660 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Cash Deposit: Receipt # 003393 Account # 18820002315 $1,850.00 Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:tch Attachment HILLSIDE WlL~ON t.I BANYAN UPLAND BASELINE FOflTANA THE cITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA 4lb ONTARIO R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A E N Gl N E E R I N G D E P A r~ T M E N T Staff Report DATE: February 2, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O Neil, C'ty Engineer BY: Tasha Hunter, Public Service Tech I SUBJECT: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE ALL BONDS AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2001-00275, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF HELMS AVENUE BETVVEEN ARROW ROUTE AND 9TH STREET, SUBMITTED BY ALBERT AND BETTY GUTIERREZ, TRUSTEE OF THE GUTIERREZ FAMILY TRUST RECOMMENDATION: The required improvements for DR'C2001-00275 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release all Bonds. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: As a condition of approval of completion of DRC2001-00275, located on the east side of Helms Avenue between Arrow Route and 9th Street, the applicant was required to complete street improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City Council release all existing Bonds and file a Notice of Completion. Developer: Albert and Betty Gutierrez, Trustee of the Gutierrez Family Trust Release: All Bonds Respectfully submitted, WI ~am d. O Ned City Engineer WJO:TCH Attachment(s) N. ES -- PROJE~I' L oCA l/ON FO0 Tt'/ILL BL VD AF~POW '~ ROU T~ 6TH .~ TREE T City of Rancho Cucamonga RESOLUTION NO. ~,,.~-' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2001-00275 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for DRC2001-00275 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT S Repo t DATE: February 2, 2005 TO:. Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Tasha Hunter, Public Service Tech I SI. EMECT: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE ALL BONDS AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2002-00185, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE KNUCKLE INTERSECTION OF DORSET STREET AND CARTILLA AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY RANCHO PACIFIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION RECOMMENDATION: The required improvements for DRC2002-00185 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release all Bonds. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: As a condition of approval of completion of DRC2002-00185, located on the southeast comer of the knuckle intersection of Dorset Street and Cartilla Avenue, the applicant was required to complete street improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City Council release all existing Bonds and file a Notice of Completion. Developer. Rancho Pacific Development Corporation Release: All Bonds Respectfully submitted, W~lliam J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:TCH Attachment(s) Vicinity Map N.'T.S. J ~ '.[rS^CT ~. " .., ~J ~LOT ~ ~ DRC20 -  02 00185 - '~~ I · . ~LVD. . Ci~ of Rancho CuCamong~' RESOLUTION NO. ~5-~Z{~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2002.-00185 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for DRC2002-00185 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A E N G I N E E R I N G D E P A R T M E N T Staff Report DAIE: February 2, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Tasha Hunter, Public Service Tech I SUBJECT: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RETAIN THE CASH DEPOSIT FROM PERMIT ROW2003-00881 IN THE AMOUNT OF $250.00 AND PERMIT ROW2004- 00617 IN THE AMOUNT OF $500.00, FOR A TOTAL OF $750.00, IN LIEU OF A MAINTENANCE BOND AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2002-00292, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF WHITE OAK AVENUE AND ARROW ROUTE, SUBMITTED BY CAPELLINO AND ASSOCIATES RECOMMENDATION: The required improvements for DRC2002-00292 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City CJerk to retain the cash deposit from permit ROW2003-00881 in the amount of $250.00 and permit ROW2004-00617 in the amount of $500, for a total of $750.00, in lieu of a Maintenance Bond. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: As a condition of approval of completion of DRC2002-00292, located on the southeast corner of White Oak Avenue and Arrow Route, the applicant was required to complete street improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the Cibj, Council retain the cash deposit from permit ROW2003-00881 in the amount of $250.00 and permit ROW2004-00617 in the amount of $500.00, for a total of $750.00, in lieu of a Maintenance Bond. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:TCH Attachment(s) Vicinity Map ~...~' ~.. City of Rancho Cucamonga Parcel Map 16044 5 parcels s Exhibit "A" RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2002-00292 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for DRC2002-00292 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 8t Report DATE: February 2, 2005 TO:. Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Tasha Hunter, Public Service Tech I SUBJECT: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE ALL BONDS AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2002-00728, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF AZUSA COURT, VVEST OF MILLIKEN AVENUE, SUBMI'I-rED BY FULLMER CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDATION: The required improvements for DRC2002-00728 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release all Bonds. BACKGROUNDIANALYSlS: As a condition of approval of completion of DRC2002-00728, located on the west side of Azusa Court, west of Milliken Avenue, the applicant was required to complete street improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City Council release all existing Bonds and file a Notice of Completion. Developer:. Fullmer Construction Release: All Bonds Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:TCH Attachment(s) M~iKXJNK S TA ~I(W RANCHO. CUCAMONGA ONTARIO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Trr]'.~,~ ENG]IN-RRRING DIVISION /~ RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2002-00728 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for DRC2002-00728 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. R A N C H O C U C A M © N G A ~ N G I N ~ E R I N G D E P A i~ T M E N T DATE: February 2, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Tasha Hunter, Public Service Tech I SUBJECT: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND, ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2002-00306, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ALTA LOMA DRIVE, APPROXIMATELY 300 FEET WEST OF HAVEN AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY GLENWOOD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION RECOMMENDATION: The required improvements for DRC2002-00306 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond and accept a Maintenance Bond. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: As a condition of approval of completion of DRC2002-00306, located on the north side of Alta Loma Drive, approximately 300 feet west of Haven Avenue, the applicant was required to complete street improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City Council release the existing Faithful Performance Bond and accept the Maintenance Bond. Developer: Glenwood Development Corporation Release: Faithful Performance Bond SU5003779 $10,7000.00 (Bond No.) Accept: Maintenance Bond SUS003779-A $1,070.00 (Bond No.) Respectfu!ly submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:TCH Attachment(s) /¢¢ Vicinity Map. N DRC2002-00306 S RESOLUTION NO. ~,~"~/"/..~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2002-00306 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for DRC2002-00306 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. RA N C H O C U C A M O N G A E N G I N E E R I N G D E P A R T M E Nlr DATE: February 2, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O Ne'l, C'ty Engineer BY: Tasha Hunter, Public Service Tech I SUBJECT: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BONDS AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 14381 AND TRACT 14382, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND WILSON AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION RECOMMENDATION: The required improvements for Tract 14381 and Tract 14382 have been completed in' an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bonds. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: As a condition of approval of completion of Tract 14381 and Tract 14382, located at the northwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Wilson Avenue, the applicant was required to complete street improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City Council release the existing Faithful Performance Bonds and file a Notice of Completion. Developer:General Electric Capital Corporation Release: Faithful Performance Bonds CC's: # SD00076262 $275,000.00 # SD00076270 $184,700.00 # SD00076265 $161,600.00 # SD00081092 $305,500.00 # SD00076267 $566,500.00 # BE2618496 $300,000.00 # SD00076268 $20,000.00 # BE2618495 $270,000.00 # SD00076269 $69,500.00 Respectfully submltted' City Engineer WJ©:TCH Attachment(s) ~ i it-~- NORTH '~' 1"=1000' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ITEM: Tract Iz-/3 ENGINEERING DIVISION EXHIBIT: Vicinity NORTH '~' 1"=1000' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ri'Em: Tract//'/$$2 ENGINEERING DIVISION EXHIBIT: Vicini~ RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 14381 AND TRACT 14382 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 14381 Tract 14382 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. /50 R .A C H O C U C A M O N G A E N G I N E E R I N G D E P A R T M E N T Staff Report DATE: February 2, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Tasha Hunter, Public Service Tech I SUBJECT: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND, ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND AND FILE A NOTI(~E OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 16264, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF MOUNTAIN VIEW DRIVE BETVVEEN MILLIKEN AVENUE AND TERRA VISTA PARKWAY, SUBMITTED BY KB HOME GREATER LOS ANGELES, INC. RECOMMENDATION: The required improvements for Tract 16264 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond and accept a Maintenance Bond. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS, As a condition of approval of completion of Tract 16264, located on the south side of Mountain View Drive between Milliken Avenue and Terra Vista Parkway, the applicant was required to complete street improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City Council release the existing Faithful Performance Bend and accept the Maintenance Bond. Developer: KB Home Greater Los Angeles, Inc. Release: Faithful Performance Bond #28 52 66 $17,000.00 (Bond No.) Accept: Maintenance Bond #28 52 66 $1,700.00 (Bond No.) Respectfully submitted, William fl. 0 Nell City Engineer WJO:TCH Attachment(s) CITY OF .--- NORTH ~' NTS RANCHO CUCAMONGA ......... ITEM: _SRA~3 6 ENGINT:" -~,[NG DIVISION TITLE: ~ .. ~ EXHIBIT: RESOLUTION NO. ~ ~'" ~)/1/1 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 16264 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 16264 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. I~ A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ~NGINEEI~ING DI~DA!~ T~IEN T Slaff Report DATE: February 2, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Wi!liam J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Cindy Hackett, Associate Engineer ~ Richard Oaxaca, Engineering TechniciAn ;~ SUBJECT: ACCEPT THE 2004/2005 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - SLURRY SEAL OF VARIOUS STREETS, CONTRACT NO. 04-076 AS COMPLETE, RELEASE THE BONDS, ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $423,942.00 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council accept the 2004/2005 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation - Slurry Seal of Various Streets, Contract No. 04-076, as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion, accept a Maintenance Bond, release the Faithful Performance Bond, authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $413,474.00 six months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received and authorize the release of the retention in the amount of $42,244.20, 35 days after acceptance. Also, approve the final contract amount of $423,942.00. BACKGROUND/ANALYSI,~ The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The 2004/2005 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation - Slurry Seal of Various Streets scope of work consisted of crack sealing, slurry sealing, protection and/or adjustment of valve covers, protection of existing survey monuments and manholes, pneumatic rolling, striping and pavement markings. Pertinent information of the project is as follows: ~' Budgeted Amount: $400,000.00 (Fund 170) & $60,000.00 (Fund 176) ~ Account Numbers: 11703035650/1022170_0 & 11763035650/1022176-0 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Accept 2004/2005 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation - Slurry Seal February 2, 2005 Pa§e 2 ~ En~lineer's Estimate: $425,278.22 ~' City Council's Approval to Advertise: May 5, 2004 ~ Publish dates for local paper: May '12 & 25, 2004 ~ Bid Openin§: June ~1, 2004 ~ Contract Award Date: July 7, 2004 ~' Low Bidder: American Asphalt South, Inc. ~' Contract Amount: $4'13,474.00 ~ '10% Contin~tency: $4~1,347.40 ~ Final Contract Amount: $423,942.00 ~' Difference in Contract Amount: $~10,468.00 (2.53%) The net increase in the total cost of the project is a result of actual constructed contract bid item quantities that were above the proposed contract estimated quantities. ~,~e ctf'ully s ubmiB~...~ WJO:CH/RO:Is Attachments VICINITY MAP .---' I i' i · i · t:. i 2 _-. II UPI.,~VD RESOLUTION NO. ~5~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE 2004/2005 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - SLURRY SEAL OF VARIOUS STREETS, CONTRACT NO. 04-076 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the 2004/2005 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation - Slurry Seal of Various Streets, Contract No. 04-076, has been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bemardino County. T H C I T Y O F RANCIIO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE: February 2, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Duane A. Baker, Assistant to the City Manager SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT AN ORDINANCE THAT ADOPTS BY REFERENCE COUNTY ORDINANCE 3930, RELATING TO THE INSPECTION AND GRADING OF FOOD ESTABLISHMENTS RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council hold the public hearing on this matter to consider adoption of the attached ordinance. BACKGROUND This ordinance will require food establishments to post the letter grade received from their inspection by the County. The County has adopted an ordinance that establishes a system of grading food establishments. The letter grades of this system range from "A" to "C". The grades are published on a placard that is clearly visible to the patrons of the establishment. The letter grade shows a measure of compliance with health regulations on the date of the inspection. The purpose of the ordinance is to protect public health through public notification of the health inspection results. With this system of posted grades, establishments are motivated to comply with health regulations and consumers are given information about the establishments they visit. Under this system, any food establishment that fails to attain a score of at least 80% (a "B" letter grade) shall receive written notice of the deficiencies. The food establishment will then have 30 days to correct the deficiencies and file a written request for a re-score inspection provided by the County. An establishment that fails to comply with the written notice, or that fails to attain a 80% on the re-score may be immediately closed by the County until they can achieve a score of at least 80%. In addition, any establishment that is determined to Page 2 February 2, 2005 CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT AN ORDINANCE THAT ADOPTS BY REFERENCE COUNTY ORDINANCE 3930, RELATING TO THE INSPECTION AND GRADING OF FOOD ESTABLISHMENTS pose an imminent health hazard will be subject to immediate closure regardless of the inspection score. As is currently the case, the County Division of Environmental Health Services (EHS) will do all inspections. The initial inspection will not cost the establishment but a re-score inspection will cost the establishment $52/hour. The fee is collected by the County to recover their costs for the re-inspection. This ordinance will not have any financial impact for the City. The County is already conducting inspections in the City. The adoption of this ordinance would make letter grade posting mandatory for all food establishments in the City. Resp. ectfully submitted, ///'~ ~ Duane A. Baker, Assistant to the City Manager January 20, 2005 ~' [3 ¢;'~qc~4o ¢~!~;~4'~a~*' .... The Honorable William J. Alexander May, or, City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive RanCho Cucamonga, CA 91730 . .-i '~ "" RE: City of Rancho Cucamonga Proposed Ordinance No. 739 - An Ordinance That Adopts By Reference County Ordinance No. 3930 Relating To The Inspection of Food Establishments Dear Mayor Alexander: Th& California Restaurant Association (CRA) is the largest and longest serving non-profit restaurant trade association in the nation. CRA represents Over 25,000 foodservice · est~abhshments in California, including restaurants in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. CRA is op'posed to letter grading systems. We urge the City Council to VOTE NO on the implementation of a citywide restaurant and food preparation rating system after the public hearing on February 2, 2005. We oppose letter grading systems for the following reasons: · Letter grades do not offer the public an accurate view of health and safety conditions. In addition, it is just another layer of regulation and fees placed on business that does little to promote food safety. · Many local jurisdictions are implementing more effective programs and rejecting letter grading. Recently the City of San Francisco has rejected a letter grading system recognizing that it is not the solution for promoting food safety. · The posted grade, which remains posted over a period of time, may give a false sense of security or condemnation in the eyes of a public that does not know the implication for the grade. For example, a customer would not know ifa restaurant received a "B" grade for aesthetic or risk-based reasons. Was there a crack in the tile in a linen closet or a sanitation problem in the kitchen? · Posted "ABC" grades, based on a periodic inspection report, are shortsighted because they are based only on a snapshot in time. No matter how much effort is made to remove subjectivity from the process, there is still a subjective determination based on the circumstances observed by one inspector at one point in time. · Letter grading does little to promote food safety. Instead, it causes the emphasis ia many restaurant operations to become "how to get an 'A' grade" rather than on "how can we do a better job at assuring the safety and health of our guests." We share yo3~r commitment to food safety, however, we support letter grading alternatives that we believe are more effective in informing the public about the health status of restaurants. We welcome the opportunity to work with you in exploring such alternatives. In the interim, .we urge you to VOTE NO on Proposed Ordinance No. 739. l~atrick J. Shipley, Esq. Director of Local Government Affairs California Restaurant Association CC: Jack Lam, City Manager ORDINANCE NO. 739 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ADOPTING, BY REFERENCE, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ORDINANCE NO. 3930 RELATING TO INSPECTION GRADING OF FOOD ESTABLISHMENTS AND AMENDING TITLE 8 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE. A. RECITALS. (i) On June 22, 2004, the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino adopted its Ordinance No. 3930 ("Ordinance No. 3930") relating to inspection grading of food establishments. (ii) By agreement, the County of San Bernardino enforces health-related codes of the State, as well as local health codes and ordinances. It is the intent of the City Council in adopting this ordinance to provide for the inspection and grading of food establishments within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. (iii)California Government Code §50022.9, et seq. authorizes the adoption by reference of county codes and provisions thereof, including Ordinance No. 3930. (iv) On February 2, 2005, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted and concluded a duly noticed public hearing as required by California Government Code § 50022.3. (v) A full, true and correct copy of Ordinance No. 3930 is on file and available for inspection in the office of the City Clerk or designee thereof. (vi) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B, ORDINANCE. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby ordains as follows: SECTION: 1 The facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION: 2 A new Chapter 8.32 is hereby added to Title 8 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to read as follows: Ordinance No. 739 Page 2 of 13 "Chapter 8.32 "INSPECTION GRADING OF FOOD ESTABLISHMENTS "Sections 8.32.010 Regulations governing inspection grading of food establishments adopted. 8.32.020 Fees. 8.32.030 Penalties. "8,32.010 Regulations governing inspection grading of food establishments adopted. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Code, Ordinance No. 3930 of the County of San Bernardino adding Chapter 14 to Division 3 of Title 3 of the San Bernardino County Code, pertaining to inspection grading of food establishments, is hereby adopted by reference. "8.32.020 Fees. Notwithstanding any provision contained in the San Bernardino County Code, fees required by any provision of Ordinance No. 3930, including Section 2 thereof, or any successor ordinance or provision thereto, shall be as established by the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino, unless the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has adopted a fee for the same service or activity, in which case each such City-adopted fee shall be the applicable fee. "8.32.030 Penalty. A violation of any of the provisions of Ordinance No. 3930 adopted by reference in this chapter shall be a misdemeanor and shall be punishable as provided in Chapter 1.12 of Title 1 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code." SECTION 3. SEVERABILITY. The City Council declares that should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance or Ordinance No. 3930 of the County of San Bernardino, adopted by reference hereby, be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences and words of this Ordinance and Ordinance No. 3930 shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 4. The provisions of this Ordinance shall become operative on March 7, 2005. SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. Please see the following page for formal adoption, certification and signatures Ordinance No. 739 Page 4 of 13 1 ORDINANCE NO. 3930 2 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF 3 CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 14 TO DIVISION 3 OF TITLE 3 AND ADDING SUBSECTION 16.0213B(b)(17) TO CHAPTER 2 OF 4 DIVISION 6 OF TITLE 1, ALL OF THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CODE, RELATING TO INSPECTION GRADING OF FOOD 5 ESTABLISHMENTS. 7 The Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bemardino, State of California, 8 ordains as follows: 9 10 SECTION 1. Chapter 14 is added to Division 3 of Title 3 of the San Bemardino 12 13il' ' CHAPTER 14 14 " INSPECTION GRADING OF FOOD ESTABLISHMENTS 15 Sections: 16 .33.1401 Authority. 17 33.1402 Foqd program official Inspection'Report. 33.1403 Grading. 18 33.1404 Notice of Closure. 33.1405 Routine Inspection. 19 : 33,1406 Posting Requirements - Penalty for Non-Compliance ~ Do~:uments Available for Public Review. 20 33.1407 Letter Grade Card - Period of ValidKT. 21 22 33.t401 Authority. 23 Pursuant to the authority cited in Chapter I (Authority and Administretion) and 24 Chapter 4 (Food Protection) of Division 3 of Title 3 of the San Bemardino County 25 Code (hereinafter referred to as the "Code"), as well as Health and Safety Code 26 ~ 113715, food establishments shall be subject to a grading system as provided 27 this Chapter. Al provisions of Chapters 1, 2, and.3 of this Division shall apply to 28' ,, this Chapter except as otherwise provided herein. SMR Ordinance No. 739 5 of 13 1 33.1402 Food Program Official Inspection Report. ' 3 Food Program Official Inspection Report ("OIR") means the written report 4 prepared and copy issued to a food establishment by the "Director" of the Division of 5 Environmental Health Services, Department 'of Public Health, as defined in subsection 6 33.0115(c), or his designee, ("health official") after conducting a Routine Inspection of 7 a food establishment to determine compliance with all applicable federal, state, and 8 local laws and regulations relating to the protection of public health. For purposes of 9 this Chapter only, "food establishment" [as' defined in subsection 33.042(c)] shall t0 mean only a retail food establishment at a permanent location. 11 12 33.1403 Grading. 13 (a) "Grade' means the letter grad. e issued by the health official at the 14 conclusion of the ·Routine Inspection of a fo~ establishment. The grade shall be 15 based upon the scoring method set forth in this section resu]ting from the OIR and 15 shall reflect the food establishment's degree Of comp{ianca with all applicable federal, 17 stats, and local laws and regulations relating to the protection of public health. 18 (b) "Letter Grade Card" means a Card that shall be posted by the health 19 official at a food establishment upon completion of a Routine Inspection that indiCates 20 the letter grade of the food establishment as determined by the health official using 21 the scodng method set forth in this section and includes an Inspection Summary Report, as shown by Figures 1 through 3. An Inspection Summary Report is a 23 summary of the OIR as defined in section 33.1402. 24 //I 25 /// 26 27· /// /// SMR Ordinance No. 739 Page 6 of 13 Ordinance No. 739 Page 7 of 13 4' 5 15 18 ,// : fll ~242326 SMR ~14~004 Ordinance No. 739 Page 8 of 13 2 i~sp~ion $~ Report C 5 6 ? 8 t ' 11 ~:~ 13 15 16 17 18 FZG~ 3 19 20 (c) Any food establishment that fails to affain at least a 'B' grade, as 21 herein, shall be issued wri~en notice, through an OIR, by ~ health official. ~ fo~ es~lishment must ~ffect the cleric encies listed in the OIR and must file a 23 ~]wd,en request for a'.'r~score insp~tion with the health offici~ wi~in 30 da~ of the 24 [~OIR. A re-score inspection shall be conducted by the health o~ci~ and be subje~ to 25 a re-score inspeai0n fee ~ provided in the Code. Schedule of Fees. The heath 26 official will complete the re-score inspection within ten (10) Coun~ business days of 27 :cod establishment,s filing of a wri~en request for a re-score inspection. A food 28 ~stablishment fai{'~ng to c~mply with the OIR. or failing to affain at least a 'B' grade on SMR Ordinance No. 739 of 13 I the re-score inspection, may be immediately closed by the health officiaJ and remain 2 closed until at least a "B" grade is achieved on a re-score inspection. Nc thing in this 3 shall prohibit the health official from immediately closin any food ~'~' ', at his discretion, immediate closure is necessaQ/to prote~-- the public 5 health. 6 (d) The letter grade shall be based upon the final numedca )ercentage 7 score set forth in the OIR as follows: 8 (1) A grade of "A" shall indicate a final score (~f ninety p, ;ant (90%) 9 or higher, as determined by the health official; 10 (2) A grade of "B" shall indicated a final score of eighty-~ line percent 11 (89%) but not less than eighty percent (80%), as determined by the health official; 12 (3) A grade of "C' shall indicate a final score of seventy- line percent 13 (79%) but not less than seventy percent (70%), as determined by.~the heal :h official. 14 15 33.1404 Notice of Closure. 16 'Notice of Closure" means a public notice that shall be posted ' the health official at a food establishment upon suspension or revocation the food establishment's public health permit and that results in the:closure the food 19 establishment and the discontinuance of all operations of the food establishment, by 20 order of the health official, because of violations of applicable federal, sta :e, and local' 21 laws and regulations relating to the protection of public health. The Nofic ~ of Closure shall remain posted until removed by the health official, Rem. oval of le Notice of 23 Closure by any person other than the health official or the refus~ of a food 24 establishment to close upon issuance of the written notice of suspension 3f the public 25 health permit is a violation of this Chapter and may result in the revocatio~ of the food 26 establishment's public health permit and shall be punishabl~ as sPecifiE in section 27 33.0112 of this Code. SMR Ordinance No. 739 Page 10 of 13 33.1405 Routine Inspection. 2 "Routine Inspection" means an unannounced inspection of any food 3 establishment to determine compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local 4 laws and regulations relating tO the protection of public health. A Routine Inspection 5 shall not mean an inspection conducted by the health official to determine compliance 6 with a previously issued OIR or any interim inspection conducted to determine 7 compliance with specific regulations or legal requirements. 8 9 33.1406 Posting Requirements - Penalt~ for Non-Compliance - Documents 10 Available for Public Review.. 11 (al Upon completion of the Routine Inspection, the health official shall post 12 at every food establishment the Letter Grade Card, so as to be clearly visibie to the 13 to pat~'ons entering the food establishment. "Clearly visible to the 14 patrons" ~hall mean: ' 15 (1) Posted in the front window of the food establishment within five 16 (5) feet of the front door;,. 17 (2) Posted in a display case mounted on the outs de ~front wall of the 18 food establishment within five (5) feet of the front door;, or 19 (3) Posted in' a location approved by the health official to ensure 20 notice to the general public and to patrons. 21 (b) In the event that a food.establishment is operated in the same building 22 or space as a separately licensed or permitted business, or in the event that a food 23 establishment shares a common patron entrance with a separately licensed or 24 permitted business, or in the event of both, the health official shall post the Letter 25 ;rade Card, in the initial patron contact area, or in a location approved by the health 26 27 (c) The Letter G~a~de. Card shall not be defaced, marred, camouflaged, 28 ~ or removed. It sha~!l be unlawful to operate a food establishment unless the SMR Ordinance No. 739 11 of 13 1 Letter Grade Card is posted. Removal of the Letter Grade Card is a viol tion of this 2 Chapter and may result in the suspension or revocation of the public he~alth permit 3 and shall be punishab!e as spec fled in section 33.0112 of this Code. be maintained 4' (d) The OIR upon which the Letter Grade Card is based shall 5 at the food establishment and shall be available to the general public an~ to patrons $ for review upon request. The food establishment shall keep the OIR until such time I 7 as the health official completes the next Routine Inspection of the food establishment 8 9 and issues a new CIR. ' . 10 33.1407 Letter Grade Card - Period of Validity. · '. 11 . A Letter Grade Card shall remain valid until the health official completes, the 12 next Routine Inspection of the food establishment. A re-sCOre inspe~ctlon is a 13 complete Routine Inspection that may be required 'of (as provided in .IS~bsection 14 33.1403(c)), or requested by, the food establishment. 15 (a) A re-score inspection shall be conducted by the health official following 16 the filing of a re-score inspection request form. in .accordance with ~he' Code, 17 Schedule of Fees, the re-score inspection fee must be paid by the food establishment 18 upon demand by the health official. !- lg (b) At the conclusion of the re-score inspection of the food est~ablishment 20 the Letter Grade Card shall be issued based upon the scoring method set ~rth in this 21 Chapter resulting from the OIR.. 22 (c) · A requested re-score inspection is separate and independeqt of all re- 23 inspections of cdtical violations as determined by the health official. 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// /// 28 II/ ~..,. SMR '1 Ordinance No. 739 Page 12 of 13 1 SECTION 2. Subsection 16.0213B(b)(17) is added to Chapter 2 of Division 6 of 2 Title I of the San Bernardino County Code, to read: 3 4 6.0213B Health Services - Environmental. 5' (b) Food/Recreational I~lealth Program Fee: 6 7 (17) Re-score Inspection .................... $52.00/hr. 8 9 SECTION 3. This ordinance sh. al! become effective thirty (30) days from the 10 - of adoption andits provisions shallbe~eop/~ra, tT/n O~/~ber 1,2004. 12 DENNIS HAN-SBERGE~, Chairman 13 Board of Supervisors 14 15 SIGNED AND CERTIFIED THAT A coPY )F THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN DELIVERED 16 ~ THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD 17 18 : the Board of Supen/isors 19 21 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) )SS. 22 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 23 , J. RENEE BASTIAN, Cierk of the Board of Superviso~ of the County of San 24 Bernardino, State of California, hereby certify that at a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of said County and State, held on the 22act day of Juae , 25 2004, at which meeting were present SupervisorS; 26 ~ost~us, B:[ane, A~u~ar~ Young. Hansber~ar.' 27 and the Clerk, the foregoing ordinanc~ was passed and adopted by the following vote, to wit: 28 SMR Ordinance No. 739 13 of 13 AYES: SUPERVISORS: B:Lane, Agut.az:, ¥oun8, Eansberse]: 2 NOES: SUPERVISORS: 3 ABSENT: SUPERVISORS: l~one 4 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affb the official 5 Deal of the Board of Supervisors this 22aa day of__ ,2004. June 7 J. ~rk of the 3oard of Su~r-e~ "~L~.pt~of San Bemardino, ~,pproved as to Form 11 Ronald D. Reitz, County Counsel 13 Deputy 15 16 17 18 20 21 23 24 27 28 ., SMR TH CITY OF ~ANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: February 2, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Larry Henderson, AICP, Principal Planner SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FROM GRANITE EQUITIES (DEVELOPERS OF HENDERSON CREEK PROJECT) TO HAVE THE CITY DESIGNATE THE HABITAT TRUST AS A QUALIFIED CONSERVATION ENTITY FOR THE PURPOSE OF THE MANAGING OF 54 ACRES OF OPEN SPACE PURSUANT TO AN OPEN SPACE TRANSFER PLAN IN SATISFACTION OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE HENDERSON CREEK PROJECT. RECOMMENDATION: Determine that the Habitat Trust has not demonstrated sufficient qualifications as a conservation entity for the required open space transfer and direct the properly to be transferred to the County of San Bernardino Special Districts OS-1. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: On July 7, 2004, the City Council approved the project commonly known as the Henderson Creek Development by certifying the Final Environmental Impact Report for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16324, Development Agreement DRC2003-00751, and Annexation DRC2003-00865 to initiate proceedings for the annexation of 160 acres of land generally located on the north side of Wilson Avenue between Etiwanda Avenue and East Avenue; to allow the General Plan Land Use Amendment from Very Low Residential (.1-2 dwelling units per acre) to Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) for approximately 63.5 acres of land; to approve the amendment to the Etiwanda North Specific Plan to change the district designation for 63.5 acres of land from Very Low Residential (.1-2 dwelling units per acre) to Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre); deny the appeal thus upholding the Planning Commission's decision to approve Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16324; and to adopt an Ordinance to allow the City to enter into Development Agreement DRC2003-00751. The subject land was annexed to the City on December 26, 2004, by the actions of the Local Area Formation Commission (LAFCO). CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT HENDERSON CREEK OPEN SPACE TRANSFER February 2, 2005 Page 2 Granite Equities has submitted a request for the City to consider the Habitat Trust as the conservation entity for managing the open space habitat that was required as mitigation in the final EIR and by the Development Agreement. The attached correspondence details the information requested by staff and submitted by the Habitat Trust in support of City approval. Specifically, the Open Space Transfer requirement is as follows: Open Space Transfer Plan The Property Owner shall transfer to the County of San Bernardino Special Districts OS-1 or other qualified conservation entity approved by the City, in fee, a minimum of 54 acres of off-site land for permanent open space and habitat preservation; along with funding in an amount to be mutually agreed upon by the property owner and the conservation entity, to provide for long-term maintenance of said land. The preferred location of the off-site land is in the environment surrounding the North Etiwanda Preserve in the City's Sphere-of-Influence, other properties may be considered based upon the review of appropriate Biological Habitat Assessments and concurrence of the City Planner. The transfer and funding shall occur prior to recording of the first final map of the project. This condition or requirement is pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15097 (a), the City is responsible for ensuring that mitigation measures imposed on the project are implemented and accomplished in accordance with the Mitigation Monitoring Program. In addition, the mitigation measures imposed on the project must be fully enforceable through permit conditions, agreements, or other measures (Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 (b); CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.4 (a)(2)). Therefore, the City is held accountable under State law to assure that the mitigation measure is adequately addressed. In reviewing the information requested and supplied to the City, staff does not believe the Trust is an acceptable entity for the following reasons: 1. The most recent auditor's report for the Trust, received November 24, 2004, does not clearly reflect that the information is for Habitat Trust's financial records and that they are in compliance with annual audit requirements. The report was for the Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs (SEE) as of December 31, 2002. 2. A copy of the Habitat Resource Management Plan (or similar property management document) with all related habitat studies for the nearest site currently owned by the Trust was received November 24, 2004, (appears to be unsigned draft of a Document called, "The Habitat Trust for Wildlife Nature Sanctuaries Management Plan Cucamong(n)a, {sic} North Etiwanda, West Valley Foothills Area 2003-2004." The submitted document acknowledges it was, "... adapted from the North Etiwanda Habitat Preserve Management Plan, 2001 USFWS, CDFG, San Bernardino County Open Space District 1." The submitted document is incomplete with blank spaces and no map exhibits attached as referenced. 3. A list of all Board Members of the Trust has not been provided. Craig Sherman's letter dated November 15, 2004, received November 24, 2004, indicates that currently there are only three Board Members. We note that none of the Board Members are from the local CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT HENDERSON CREEK OPEN SPACE TRANSFER February 2, 2005 Page 3 4. A list of the Trust Office locations has not been provided. 5. A list of personnel who would be involved with management of the Open Space Transfer Plan, including their qualifications and experience, is still outstanding according to Hogle Ireland transmittal sheet received November 24, 2004. Staff received, via e-mail on January 5, 2004, a resume for Kenneth Shawn Smallwood, a consulting ecologist. Also, via e-mail on January 20, 2005, the addition of Professor Jim des Laurier, a zoologist, from Claremont, CA, that taught at Chaffey College, Rancho Cucamonga, for over 25 years. We assume that based on Mr. Sherman's previous correspondence that they rely on volunteers to accomplish qualified biological studies and analysis for on-going management responsibilities. 6. A proposed Operations Plan including a maintenance schedule was not submitted. CORRESPONDENCE: Copies of this report were mailed to Craig Sherman, Legal Counsel to Habitat Trust; Dorian Johnson, Executive Vice President, Granite Equities; and Paul Biane, 2nd District Supervisor of San Bernardino County. CONCLUSION: In staff's opinion, the Habitat Trust is not an acceptable entity from an open management standpoint and that the County Open Space District with its local board of directors and County museum and Code Enforcement staff provide a complete and publicly accountable management entity. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:LH\ma Attachments: Exhibit"A" -Memo dated July 15, 2004, Responding to Paul Biane, 2nd District Supervisor Exhibit "B" - Transmittal dated November 15, 2004, from Hogle-lreland Exhibit "C" - Correspondence from Craig Sherman dated November 3, 2004 Exhibit "D" - Transmittal dated November 18, 2004, from Hogte-lreland Exhibit"E" - Letter from Dorian A. Johnson, Granite Homes, dated November 3, 2004 Exhibit "F" - Transmittal dated November 24, 2004, from Hogle-lreland Exhibit "G" - Correspondence from Craig Sherman dated November 15, 2004 Exhibit"H"-Kenneth Shawn Smallwood's Resume Received Via E-mail January 5, 2005 Exhibit"l" - Letter from Dorian A. Johnson, Granite Homes, dated January 10, 2005 T H E CITY OF ]~z\ ~ C [! 0 C L CA F! 0 N Memorandum DATE: July 15, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of City Council ~ Lam, City Manager FRO~////f,~ad Buller, City Planner BYf. Larry Henderson AICP, Principal Planner SUBJECT: RESPONSE TO JUNE 14, 2004 LETTER FROM PAUL BIANE, SECOND DISTRICT SUPERVISOR This memorandum is to update the Mayor and City Council on the actions of staff to address Supervisor Biane's concerns relative to recent annexation/development agreements and open space transfer language contained therein. The subject letter from Supervisor Biane is attached for reference. In summary, the letter requests the Council consider using the County Open Space District as the preferred entity for receiving open space mitigation land and not individual non-profit groups. The County's position is adequately explained and staff does not dispute the position of the Supervisor's Office. The current language in the City Development Agreement was intended to offer some flexibility in handling potential litigation from environmental interest groups and not to eliminate the County from consideration as the open space receiver. Staff has taken the following actions in response to Supervisor's Biane's request. 1. Before and affer receiving the County's letter staff has talked to and met with County staff tb communicate the City's position as outlined above. 2. Staff and each of the Project/s Applicants for the annexations met with Supervisor Biane on June 29, 2004, to discuss this issue. It was indicated that it was not the County's intent to hinder the process but to express the preference for open space management. City staff's recommendation that the City Planner refer all open space mitigation plans back to the City Council for ultimate decision was acceptable to the County and the ProjectJs Applicants. A formal response for the City was not needed. In conclusion, staff will bring back to the City Council the individual open space mitigation land plans at the time of submittal. If there are any questions, please contact Larry Henderson or me. BB:LH/Is cc: Pamela Easter " lq q . marh 12f ~tt/flel-t~fi[Irfi PAUL BIANE Cmml l nf emaraina S ER<SOR SECO DIS CT ... ADMINISTR~TION JUN 1 7 2804 June 14, 2004 Mayor Bill Alexander City Council Members . City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Mayor and Council Members, It is with reluctance that I write this letter, but I need to express my concerns about the recent actions that have been pursued by certain environmental groups in regard to development in the Northern EtJwanda Area. As you probably know, the City of Rancho Cucamonga's standard form Development Agreement includes a section entitled "Open Space Transfer Plan" that currently states, "The Property Owners shall transfer to the County of San Bemardino Special Districts 08-1, or other qualified conservation entities approved by the City..." I would urge the City Council to reconsider this provision and rewdte it to read, "The Property Owners shall transfer property to the County of San Bernardino Special Districts OS- 1." The following are the reasons for my proposal: 1. San Bernardino County, CSA 70 OS-1 is a public entity of San Bernardino County; this means that CSA 70 OS-1 is held accountable to the citizenry for its action(s). 2. The North Etiwanda Commission oversees the North Etiwanda Preserve and holds quarterly meetings that are open to the public. 3. The North Etiwanda Preserve has a management plan that has been approved by U.S. Fish and Wildlife, as well as the State of California Department of Fish & Game. The County of San Bernardino and the City of Rancho Cucamonga have historically had an excellent working relationship, and one of the ways we continue that excellent relationship is by working together to ensure that there is appropriate preservation of resources in the area. Imposing a requirement that private developers transfer property to "...other qualified conservation entities approved by the City..." will not provide for independent public agency oversight, accountability to the public and a coordinated approach to open space management. We have a great concern about transferring stewardship of open space to groups that may have San Bernardinn Caunty. Government Center · 385 Norlh.~rrowhead Avenue, F[fi'h Boor · San Beraardir~o, CA 9241 ~0 I10 · (909) 387-4833 · Fax (909) 387-3265 R~ncho Cucarntm~a Distficl Office · Foo~hili Communides Law and Justice Cenlcr · 8303 Ha~en A~nu¢ . ,~n, ,tho Cucamong~ CA 91730 · 19091945429?. · [~-x (~091945-40,~7 insufficient resources to properly manage open space, and in the name of the environment, file frivolous lawsuits that only serve to delay development, increase their land banks and build up their own bank accounts. Do not hesitate to contact myField Representative,· Tim Johnson, or me at (909) 945-4297 if you have any questions or wish to further discuss this important matter. I thank you for your · time and consideration. Sincerely, PAUL BIANE Second District Supervisor PB:TJ:MB:as Ashawe/cJ~ydocument,.~PauFRC~6-14-04 4280 Latham Street, Suite C Riverside, CA 92501 Firm (951) 787-9222 FAX (951) 781-6014 www. hogleireland, com TRANSMITTAL TO: Larry Henderson DATE: November 15, 2004 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division PROJECT NO: 1512 PROJECT: Henderson Creek FROM: Pam Steele E-MAIL ADDRESS: psteele@hogleireland.com TRANSMITTED BY: Fax X Hand Delivered By C.J. Davis Overnight Mail/Delivery By Mail QUANTITY DESCRIPTION 1 copy City letter from Brad Buller dated October 7, 2004 1 package Information from The Habitat Trust Including: Letter to Roger Grable from Craig Sherman dated November 3, 2004 w/exhibits: 1. Incorporation papers 2. Adopted bylaws 3. Dept of Treasury, IRS exempt organization ruling 4. Action agenda/accomplishments 5/5/02 5. Summary of qualifications 6. Descriptions / species list- North Etiwanda Sanctuary 7. Two (2) informational brochures For your information X Per your request URGENT For your approval X For your review For Submittal/Resubmittal COMMENTS: Larry, These items are being submitted in response to our request to The Habitat Trust to provide the information and materials requested in Brad Bullet's letter dated October 7, 2004. Mr. Sherman's response letter is also included. In our review of the City's letter and the information provided, we have identified several items that are still outstanding - and we have requested these additional items from The Habitat Trust. Specifically the additional items we have requested to be provided, corresponding to the numbering in the City's letter, are: 2. Board minutes reflecting acquisition of the mitigation property. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 4. Audited financial statement. RECEIVED - PLANNING Henderson Creek November 15, 2004 Transmittal to City - The Habitat Trust documents Page 2 5. Management Plan or strategy. 7. List of Board Members of the Trust. 8. Personnel - employees or volunteers who would be actively involved in the management of the property. 9. Operations Plan/Maintenance Schedule. As soon as we receive any of this additional information, we will provide it to you as well. If you have any questions in the interim, please call me at (951) 787-9222 cc: Steve Stewart, Henderson Creek LLC Dorian Johnson, Granite Homes Roger Grable, Manatt, Phelps, & Phillips w/o attachments - via facsimile 714-371-2550 CRAIG A. SHERMAN A~q-ORNEY AT LAW 1901 FIRST AVENUE, SUITE 335 SAN DIEGO, CA 92101-2311 SHERMANLAW@AOL COM TELEPHONE November - ~, 2004 FACSIMILE (619) 702-7892 (619) 702-9291 Via Facsimile (714) 3 71-2550 Followed by Overnight Mail Roger A. Grable, Esq. MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS 695 Town Center, 14th Floor Costa Mesa, California 92626 Re: Qualifications of The Habitat Trust for Wildlife, Inc. Henderson Creek Properties, Mitigation Lands This letter responds on behalf of Spirit of the Sage Council and The Habitat Trust for Wildlife, Inc. to provide requested information about The Habitat Trust for Wildlife, Inc. as being a recognized entity for acquiring and managing conservation lands. In addition to the enclosed information about The Habitat Trust's (THT) corporate land trustee status, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has already acknowledged and accepted this land trust (originally formed through its fiscal sponsor, SEE, Inc.) as the donee for City of Rancho Cucamonga project environmental mitigation land. Excluding 500 acres previously committed or granted by the County of San Bernardino, land conveyed via direct consent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga include the approximate 174 acres transferred in conjunction with the Crest/Rancho Etiwanda Estates project (Spirit of the Sage Council v. City of Rancho Cucamonga et al, San Bernardino County Superior Court, Case No. RCV 057112). Notwithstanding the prior City of Rancho Cucamonga, federal and state agency recognition of THT's land trust qualifications, find enclosed requested information about The Habitat Trust, including: (1) incorporation papers; (2) adopted bylaws; (3) Dept. of Treasury, IRS exempt organization ruling; (4) action agenda/accomplishments 5/5/02; (5) summary of qualifications; (6) description/species list - North Etiwanda Sanctuary; and (7) informational brochure, 2 included). Craig A. Sherman Encls, EXHIBIT 1 ~ ' ENDORSED. FILED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION FOR THE CALIFORNIA NONPROFIT CORPORATION FEB ~. ? ~02 THE HABITAT TRUST FOR WILDLIFE Articles of Incorporation of the undersigned, a majority of whom are citizens of the United States, desiring to form a Nonprofit Corporation under the Nonprofit Co~porafion Law of California, do hereby certif3~: I The name of this corporation is THE HABITAT TRUST FOR WILDLIFE. II A This corporation is a nonprofit PUBLIC BENEFIT CORPORATION and is not organized for the private gain of any person. It is organized under the Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation Law for public and charitable purposes. B The specific purposes of this corporation are: 1. The acquisition, conservation, restoration, and management of habitat for rare, threatened and endangered species of plants, fish and wildlife that may also contribute to scientific research, education and ecological reserve in perpetuity; and 2. To accept financial contributions and service donations to fult-fll objectives and purposes identified in (1.) and for adrninistrafive needs. III A The name and address in the State of California of the corporation's haitial agent for service of process is Dolores Welty, 30 N. Raymond Avenue, #302-303, Pasadena, California 91103. BThe names and addresses of the persons who are the initial trustees of the corporation are as follows: Name: Address: Dolores Welty 2076 Sheridan Road, Leucadia, CA 92024 Mary. K. Knight 1122 Oak Street, Santa Monica, CA 90405 Steve Sugarman 20178 Rockport Way, Malibu, CA 90265 Leeona KJippstein 439 Westwood S/C #144, Fayetteville, NC 28314 Frank Schiavone 8060 Crestviexv Court, Alta Loma, CA 91701 IV A This corporation is organized and operated exclusively for charitable purposes within the meaning of Section 501(c)(3), Internal Revenue Code. I of 2 B No substantial part of the activities of this corporation shall consist of carrying on propaganda, or otherwise attempting to influence legislation, and the corporation shall not participate or intervene in any political campaign (including the publishing or distribution of statements) on behalf of any candidate for public office. C Notwithstanding any other provision of these articles, this corporation shall not, except to an insubstantial degree, engage in any activities or exercise any powers that are not in furtherance of the purposes of this corporation. V The property of this corporation is irrevocably dedicated to charitable purposes and no part of the net income or assets of this corporation shall ever inure to the benefit of any director, officer or member thereof or to the benefit of any private person. Upon the dissolution or winding up of the corporation, its assets remaining after payment, or provision for payment, of all debts and liabilities of this corporation shall be distributed to a nonprofit fund, foundation or corporation which is organized and operated exclusively for charitable purposes and xvhich had established its tax exempt status under Section 501(c)(3), Internal Revenue Code. In wimess whereof, we have hereunto subscribed our names this 11 th day of February of 2002. Crxig A. Sherman, Esq. Incorporator 2 0f2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL OF NAME Pursuant to section 3903 of the Financial Code, I, DONALD R. MEYER, Commissioner of Financial Institutions of the State of California, do hereby approve the name "THE HABITAT TRUST FOR WILDLIFE" set forth in the attached Articles of Incorporation of The Habitat Trust for Wildlife. Given under my hand and official seal this 14th day of Febmaxy, 2002, in the City and · County of San Francisco, State of Califomia. DONALD R. MEYER Commissioner of Financial Institutions JAMES M. PATTEN Staff Counsel EXHIBIT 2 ~o40r~oc.r'' 3, ~oo~ BYLAWS OF THE HABITAT TRUST FOR WILDLIFE Page 1 of 16 BYLAWS OF THE HABITAT TRUST FOR WILDLIFE A CALiFORNIA PUBLIC BENEFIT CORPORATION ARTICLE I - OFFICES SECTION 1. PRINCIPAL OFFICE The principal office of the corporation for the transaction of its business is located at 30 N. Raymond Ave #303, Pasadena, in Los Angeles County, California 91103. SECTION 2. CHANGE OF ADDRESS The address of the corporation's principal office can be changed only by amendment of these Bylaws and not otherwise. The Board of Directors may, however, change the principal office from one location to another by noting the changed address and effective date below, and such changes of address shall not be deemed an amendment of these Bylaws. SECTION 3. OTHER OFFICES The corporation may also have offices at such other places, within or without the State of California, where it is qualified to do business, as its business may require and as the board of directors may, fi.om time to time, designate. ARTICLE 2 - PURPOSES SECTION 1. OBJECTIVE AND PURPOSES The primary objectives and purposes of this corporation shall be: (a) To give Nature sanctuary, thru the following means; (b) The acquisition, conservation, restoration, and management of habitat for rare, threatened and endangered species of plants, fish and wildlife that may also contribute to scientific research, education and ecological reserve in perpetuity. (c) To accept financial contributions and service donations to fulfill objectives and purposes identified in (b) and for administrative needs. (d) To accept donations of vital habitat lands and waters, including management funds and/or endowments for such habitat conservation in perpetuity 125 BYLAWS OF THE HABITAT TRUST FOR WILDLIFE Page 2 of 16 ARTICLE 3 - DIRECTORS SECTION 1. NUMBER The corporation shall have five (5) directors, and collectively they shall be known as the Board of Directors. The number may be changed by amendment of this bylaw, or by repeal of this Bylaw and adoption ora new bylaw, as provided in these bylaws. SECTION 2. POWERS Subject to the provisions of the California Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation law and any limitations in the Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws relating to action required or permitted to be taken or approved by the members, if any, of this corporation, the activities and affairs of this corporation shall be conducted and all corporate powers shall be exemised by or under the direction of the Board of Directors. SECTION 3. DUTIES It shall be the duty of the directors to: (a) Perform any and all duties imposed on them collectively or individually by law, by the Articles of Incorporation of this corporation, or these bylaws; (b) Appoint and remove, employ and discharge, and, except as otherwise provided in these bylaws, prescribe the duties and fix the compensation, if any, of all officers, agents and employees of the corporation; (c) Supervise all officers, agents and employees of the corporation to assure that their duties are performed properly: (d) Meet at such times and places as required by these Bylaws; (e) Register their addresses with the Secretary of the corporation and notices of meetings mailed or telegraphed to them at such addresses shall be valid notice thereof. SECTION 4. TERMS OF OFFICE Each director shall hold office of the Board of Directors as specified in these Bylaws, and until his or her successor is appointed except for the Executive Director and/or Conservation Director that are permanent paid staff and director positions. Permanent director positions shall not require reelection by the Board of Directors. Board of Directors are appointed by the Executive Director of Spirit of the Sage Council that has legal responsibility for fulfilling settlement agreements in which land and/or funds have been given to The Habitat Trust For Wildlife. BYLAWS OF THE HABITAT TRUST FOR WILDLIFE Page 3 of 16 SECTION 5. COMPENSATION Executive Director and/or Conservation Director shall receive compensation at no more than $35.00 per hour and no more than $55,000.00 annually with Medical and Dental Insurance as employees or independent contractors for The Habitat Trust For Wildlife. Other Directors shall serve without compensation except that they shall be allowed and paid out-of-pocket expenses as authorized by the Board of Directors. In addition, they shall be allowed reasonable advancement or reimbursement of expenses incurred in thc performance of their regnlar duties as specified in Section 3 of this Article. Directors may not be compensated for rendering services to the corporation in any capacity other than director unless such other compensation is reasonable and is allowahle under thc provisions of Section 6 of this Article. SECTION 6. RESTRICTION REGARDING INTERESTED DIRECTORS Notwithstanding any other provision of these Bylaws, not more than forty-nine percent (49%) of the persons serving on the board may be interested persons. For purposes of this Section, "interested persons" means either: (a) Any person currently being compensated by the corporation for services rendered it within the previous twelve (12) months, whether as a full or part-time office of other employee, independent contractor, or otherwise, excluding any reasonable compensation paid to a director as director; or (b) Any brother, sister, ancestor, descendent, spouse, brother-in-law, sister-in-law, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, mother-in-law, or father-in-law of any such person. SECTION 7. PLACE OF MEETINGS Meetings shall be held at the principal office of the corporation unless otherwise provided by board or at such place within or without the State of California that has been designated from time to time by resolution of the Board of Directors. In the absence of such designation, any meeting not held at the principal office of the corporation shall be valid only if held on the written consent of all directors given either before or after the meeting and filed with the secretary of the corporation or after all board members have been given written notice of the meeting as hereinafter provided for special meetings of the board. Any meeting, regular or special, may be held by conference telephone or similar communications equipment, so long as all directors participating in such meeting can hear one another. SECTION 8. REGULAR AND ANNUAL MEETINGS Annual meeting of Directors shall be held on the first Friday of November at 7:00P.M.; unless such day falls on a legal holiday, in which event the annual meeting shall be held at the same hour and place the next business day. Regular meetings are not necessary except for quarterly reports by Executive Director and Financial Officer/Director to be distributed to board via electronic mail, facsimile or postal service. BYLAWS OF THE HABITAT TRUST FOR WILDLIFE Page 4 of 16 SECTION 9. SPECIAL MEETINGS Special meetings of the Board of Directors may be called by the President, the Vice President, the Secretary, or by any two directors, and such meetings shall be held at the place, within or without the State of California, designated by the persons calling the meeting, and in the absence of such designation, at the principal office of the corporation. All directors must be contacted and adequately informed of the meeting agenda. SECTION 10. NOTICE OF MEETINGS Regular meetings of the board may be held without notice. Special meetings of the board shall be held upon four (4) days notice by first class mail or forty-eight (48) hours notice delivered personally or by telephone or telegraph. If sent by mail or telegraph, the notice shall be deemed delivered on its deposit in the mails or on its delivery to the telegraph company. Such notices shall be addressed to each director at his or her address as shown the books of the corporation and email addresses. Notice of the time and place of holding an adjourned meeting need not be given to absent directors at the time and place of adjourned meeting are fixed at the meeting adjoumed and if such adjourned meeting is held no more than twenty-four (24) hours from the time of the original meeting. Notice shall be given to adjourned regular or special meeting to directors absent from the original meeting if the adjourned meeting is held more than twenty-four (24) hours from the time of the original meeting. SECTION 11. CONTENTS OFNOTICE Notice of meetings not herein dispensed with shall specify the place, day and hour of the meeting. The purpose of any board meeting needs to be specified in the notice. SECTION 12. WAIVER OF NOTICE AND CONSENT TO HOLDING MEETINGS The transactions of any meeting of the board, however called and noticed or wherever held, are as valid as though the meeting had been duly held after proper call and notice, provided a quorum, as hereinafter defined, is present and provided that either before or after the meeting each director not present signs a waiver of notice, a consent to holding the meeting, or an approval of the minutes thereof. All such waivers, consents, or approvals shall be filed with the corporate records or made a part of the minutes of the meeting. SECTION 13. QUORUM FOR MEETINGS A quorum shall consist of four (4) Directors. Except as otherwise provided by these bylaws or in the Article of Incorporation of this corporation, or by law, no business shall be considered by the board at any meeting at which quorum, as hereinafter defined, is not present, and the only motion which the chair shall entertain at such meeting is a motion to adjourn. However, as majority of the directors present at such meeting may adjourn from time to time until the time fixed for the next regular meeting of the board. BYLAWS OF THE HABITAT TRUST FOR WILDLIFE Page 5 of 16 When a meeting is adjourned for lack of a quorum, it shall not be necessary to give any notice of the time and place of the adjourned meeting or of the business to be transacted at such meeting, other than by announcement at the meeting at which the adjournment is taken, except as provided in Section 10 of this Article. The directors present at a duly called and held meeting at which a quorum is initially present may continue to do business notwithstanding the loss of a quorum at the meeting due to a withdrawal of directors from the meeting, provided that any action thereafter taken must be approved by at least a majority of the required quorum for such meeting or such greater percentage as may be required by law, or the Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws of this corporation. SECTION 14. MAJORITY ACTION IS BOARD ACTION Every action or decision done or made by a majority of the directors present at a meeting duly held at which a quorum is present is the act of the Board of Directors, unless the Article of Incorporation or Bylaws of this corporation, or provisions of the California Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation Law, particularly those provisions relating to appointment of committees (Section 5212), approval of contracts or transactions, (Section 5233) and indemnification of directors (Section 5238c), require a greater percentage or different voting rules for approval of a matter by the board. SECTION 15. CONDUCT OF MEETINGS Meetings of the Board of Directors shall be presided over by the President of the corporation, or in his or her absence, by the Vice President of the corporation shall act as secretary of all meetings of the board, provided that, in his or her absence, the presiding officer shall appoint another person to act as Secretary of the Meeting Meetings shall be governed by Robert's Rules of Order, as such rules may be revised from time to time, insofar as such rules are not inconsistent with or in conflict with these Bylaws, with the Articles of Incorporation of this corporation, or with previsions of law. SECTION 16. ACTION BY UNANIMOUS WRITTEN CONSENT WITHOUT MEETING Any action required or permitted to be taken by the Board of Directors under any provision of law may be taken without a meeting, if all members of the board shall individually or collectively consent in writing and~or electronic mail to such action. For the purposes of this Section only, "all members of the board" shall not include any "interested director" as defined in Section 5233 of the California Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation Law. Such written consent or consents shall be filed with the minutes of the proceedings of the board. Such action by written consent shall have the same force and effect as the unanimous vote of the directors. BYLAWS OF THE HABITAT TRUST FOR WILDLI~E Page 6 of 16 Any certificate or other document filed under any other provision of law which relates to action so taken shall state that the action was taken by unanimous written consent of the Board of Directors without a meeting and that the Bylaws of this corporation authorize the directors to so act, and such statement shall be prima facie evidence of such authority. SECTION 17. VACANCIES Vacancies on the Board of Directors shall exist (1) on the death, resignation or removal of any appointed director, and (2) whenever the number of authorized directors is increased. The Board of Directors may declare vacant the office of a director who has been declared of unsound mind by a final order of court, or convicted of a felony, or been found by a final order or judgment of any court to have breached any duty under Section 5230 and following of the Califomia Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation Law. Any director may resign effective upon giving written notice to the Executive Director and/or the Conservation Director, President, the Vice President, the Treasurer, the Secretary, or the Board of Directors, unless the notice specifies a later time for the effectiveness of such a resignation. No director may resign if the corporation would then be left without a duly appointed director or directors in charge of its affairs, except upon notice to the Attorney General. Vacancies on the board may be filled by appointment by the Executive Director of the board or, in case of death of the Executive Director, the President shall appoint a replacement that is unanimously supported by remaining directors. SECTION 18. NON-LIABILITY OF DIRECTORS The directors shall not be personally liable for the debts, liabilities, or other obligations of the corporation. SECTION 19. INDEMNIFICATION BY CORPORATION OF DIRECTORS, OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES, AND OTHER AGENTS To the extent that a person who is, or was, a director, officer, employee, or other agent of this corporation has been successful on the merits in defense of any civil, criminal, administrative, or investigative proceeding brought to procure a judgment against such person by reason of the fact that he or she is, or was, an agent of the corporation, or has been successful in defense of any claim, issue or matter, therein, such person shall be indemnified against expenses actually and reasonably incurred by the person in connection with such proceeding. If such person either settles any such claim or sustains a judgment against him or her, then indemnification against expenses, judgments, fines, settlements, and other amounts reaSonably incurred in connection with such proceedings shall be provided by this corporation but only to the extent allowed by, and in accordance with the requirements of Section 5238 of the California Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation Law. BYLAWS OF THE HABITAT TRUST FOR WILDLIFE Page 7 of 16 SECTION 20. INSURANCE FOR CORPORATE AGENTS The Board of Directors may adopt a resolution authorizing the purchase of maintenance of insurance on behalf of any agent of the corporation (including a director, officer, employee or other agent of the corporation) against any liability other than for violating provisions of law relating to self-dealing (Section 5233 of the California Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation Law) asserted against or incurred by the agent in such capacity or arising out of the agents status as such, whether or not the corporation would have the power to indemnify the agent against such liability under the provisions of Section 5238 of the California Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation Law. ARTICLE 4 - OFFICERS SECTION 1. NUMBER OF OFFICERS The officers of the corporation shall be an Executive Director and/or Conservation Director, a President, a Vice President, a Secretary, and a Chief Financial Officer who shall be designated the Treasurer. The corporation may also have, as determined by the Board of Directors, Assistant Secretaries, Assistant Treasures, or other officers. Any number of offices may be held by the same person except that neither the Secretary nor the Treasurer may serve as the President. SECTION 2. QUALIFICATION, ELECTION, AND TERM OF OFFICE Any appointed person may serve as officer of this corporation. Officers shall be appointed by the Executive Director, at any time, and each officer shall hold office until he or she resigns or is removed or is otherwise disqualified to serve, or until his or her successor shall be appointed and qualified, whichever occurs first. SECTION 3. SUBORDINATE OFFICERS The Board of Directors may appoint such other officers or agents as it may deem desirable, and such officers shall serve such terms, have such authority, and perform such duties as may be prescribed from time to time by the Board of Directors. SECTION 4. REMOVAL AND RESIGNATION Any officer may be removed, either with or without cause, by the Executive Director, at any time. Any officer may resign at any time by giving written notice to the Board of Directors or to the President or Secretary of the corporation. Any such resignation shall take effect at the date of receipt of such notice or at any later date specified therein, and, unless otherwise specified therein, the acceptance of such resignation shall not be necessary to make it effective. The above provisions of this Section shall be superseded by any conflicting terms of a contract that has been approved or ratified by the Board of Directors relating to the employment of any officer of the corporation. BYLAWS OF THE HABITAT TRUST FOR WILDLIFE Page 8 of 16 SECTION 5. VACANCIES Any vacancy caused by the death, resignation, removal, disqualification, or otherwise, of any officer shall be filled by the Executive Director or in case of death, by the President. In the event of a vacancy in any office other than that of Executive Director, such vacancy may be filled temporarily by appointment by the President until such time as the Board shall fill the vacancy. Vacancies occurring in offices of officers appointed at the discretion of the board may or may not be filled as the board shall determine. SECTION 6. DUTIES OF EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR The Executive Director shall be the Chief Executive Officer of the corporation and shall supervise and control the affairs of the corporation and the activities of the officers. He or she shall perform all duties incident to his or her office and such other duties as may be required by law, by the Articles of Incorporation of this corporation, or by these Bylaws, or which may be prescribed from time to time by the Board of Directors. Unless another person is specifically appointed as Chairperson of the Board of Directors, he or she shall preside at all meetings of the Board of Directors. Except as otherwise expressly provided by law, by the Articles of Incorporation, or by the Bylaws, he or she shall, in the name of the corporation, execute such deeds, mortgages, bonds, contracts, checks or other instruments which may from time to time be authorized by the Board of Directors. As needed, the Executive Director may act as the Conservation Director. SECTION 7. DUTIES OF CONSERVATION DIRECTOR The Conservation Director shall: Oversee the management of acquired habitat lands held in trust. Hire and work cooperatively with natural resource managers and scientists. Report to Board of Directors on the status of habitats and health of the ecosystem. Assigns scientific studies and reviews reports accordingly. Provides regular site visits to habitat areas to ensure conservation efforts are adequate. Assesses and reports to the Board of Directors any and all problems or threats to habitat lands held and habitat lands that may be considered for future acquisition. In general, perform all duties incident to the office of Conservation Director and such other duties as may be required by law, by the Articles of Incorporation of the corporation, or these Bylaws. SECTION 11. DUTIES OF THE PRESIDENT Cooperate with the Executive Director in performing administratiye duties. Attend public heatings and meetings on behalf of the board when necessary. Assist Secretary and Treasurer in maintaining records from board meeting minutes and donations recognition. Review and sign comment letters and solicitation letters in regards to the organization and its conservation mission. BYLAWS OF THE HABITAT TRUST FOR WILDLIFE Page 9 o f 16 The Habitat Acquisition Coordinator shall: Cooperate with the Executive Director and/or the Conservation Director regarding habitat acquisition proposals, habitat and land donation proposals. Other duties include providing communications and meetings between interested landholders desiring to donate habitat lands and management funds and reporting to the Board of Directors. In general, perform all duties incident to the office of Habitat Acquisition Coordinator and such other duties as may be required by law, by the Articles of Incorporation of the corporation, or these Bylaws, or which may be assigned to him or her from time to time by the Executive Director or Board of Directors. SECTION 7. DUTIES OF VICE PRESIDENT In the absence of the President, or in the event of his or her inability or refusal to act, the Vice President shall perform all the duties of the President, and when so acting shall have all the powers of, and be subject to all the restrictions on, the President. The Vice President shall have other powers and perform such other duties as may be prescribed by law, by the Articles of Incorporation, or by these Bylaws, or as may be prescribed by the Board of Directors. SECTION 8. DUTIES OF SECRETARY The Secretary shall: Certify and keep at the principal office of the corporation the original, or a copy of these Bylaws as amended or otherwise altered to date: Keep at the principal; office of the corporation or at such other place as the board may determine, a book off minutes of all meetings of the directors, and, if applicable, meetings of committees of directors and of members, recording therein the time and place of holding, whether regular or special, how called, how notice thereof was given, the names of those present or represented at the meeting, and the proceedings thereof; See that all notices are duly given in accordance with the provisions of these Bylaws or required by law: Be custodian of the records and of the seal of the corporation and see that these affixed to all duly executed documents, the execution of which on behalf of the corporation under its seal is authorized by law or these Bylaws; Coordinate with the Executive Director and Treasurer the keep of, at the principal office of the corporation, a receipt of donations book containing the name ands address of each and any donors, and, in the case where any donation has been terminated, he or she shall record such fact in the membership book together with the date on which donation ceased; BYLAWS OF THE HABITAT TRUST FOR WILDLIFE Page 10of16 Exhibit at all reasonable times to any director of the corporation, or to his or her agent or attorney, on request thereof, the Bylaws, the receipt of donations book, and the minutes of the proceedings of the directors of the corporation; In general, perform all duties incident to the office of Secretary and such other duties as may be required by law, by the Articles of Incorporation, or by these Bylaws, or which may be assigned to him or her from time to time by the Board of Directors. SECTION 9. DUTIES TREASURER Subject to the provisions of these Bylaws relating to the "Execution of Insmanents, Deposits and Funds" the Treasurer shall: Have oversight and be responsible for, all funds and securities of the corporation with the Executive Director that will deposit all such funds in the name of the corporation in such banks, trust companies, or other depositories as shall be selected by the Executive Directors and from time to time as needed with review by the Board of Directors; Receive, and give receipt for, monies due and payable to the corporation from any source whatsoever with the Executive Director. Disburse, or cause to be disbursed, the funds of the corporation as may be directed by the Executive Director or the Board of Directors, taking proper vouchers for such disbursement; With the assistance of a independent Certified Public Accountant and Executive Director, keep and maintain adequate and correct accounts of the corporations properties and business transactions, including accounts of its assets, liabilities, receipts, disbursements, gains and losses; Exhibit at all reasonable times the books of account and financial records to any director of the corporation, or to his or her agent or attomey, on request therefore; Render top the Executive Director and directors, whenever requested, an account of any of all of his or her transactions as Treasurer and have the financial condition of the corporation; Prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify, or cause to be certified, the financial statements to be included in any required reports; In general, perform all duties incident to the office of Treasurer and such other duties as may be required by law, by the Articles of Incorporation of the corporation, or these Bylaws, or which may be assigned to him or her from time to time by the Board of Directors. BYLAWS OF THE HABITAT TRUST FOR WILDLIFE Page 11 of 16 SECTION 12. COMPENSATION The salaries of the officers, if any, shall be fixed from the time to time by resolution of the Board of Directors, and no officer shall be prevented from receiving such salary by reason of the fact that he or she is also director of the corporation, provided, however, that such compensation paid a director for serving as an officer of this corporation shall only be allowed if permitted under the provisions of Article 3, Section 6 of these Bylaws. In all cases, any salaried received by officers of this corporation shall be reasonable and given in return for services actually rendered for the corporation which relate to the performance of the charitable or public purposes of this corporation. ARTICLE 5 - COMMITTEES SECTION 1. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE The Board of Directors may, by a majority vote of directors, designate two (2) or more of its members (who may also be serving as officers of this corporation) to constitute an Executive Committee and delegate to such Committee any of the powers and authority of the board in the management of the business and affairs of the corporation, except with respect to: (a) The approval of any action, which, under law or the provisions of the Bylaws, requires the approval of the members or of a majority of all of the members; (b) The filling of vacancies on the board or on any committee, which has the authority of the board; (c) The fixing of compensation of the directors for serving on the board or on any committee; (d) The amendment or repeal of bylaws or the adoption of new Bylaws; (e) The amendment or repeal or any resolution of the board which by its express terms is not so amendable or repeal able; (f) The appointment of committees of the board or the members thereof; (g) The expenditure of corporate funds to support a nominee for director after there are more people nominated for directors than can be elected; (h) The approval of any transaction to which this corporation is a party and in which one or more of the directors has a material financial interest, except as expressly provided in Section 5233 (d) (3) of the California Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation Law. By a majority vote of its members then in office, the board may at any time revoke or modify any or all of the authority so delegated, increase or decrease but not below two (2) the number of its members, and fill vacancies therein from the members of the board. The BYLAWS OF THE HABITAT TRUST FOR WILDLIFE Page 12of16 Committee shall keep regular minutes of its proceedings, cause them to be filed with the corporate records, and report the same to the board from time to time as the board may require. SECTION 2. OTHER COMMITTEES The corporation shall have such other committees as may from time to time be designated by resolution of the Board of Directors. Such other committees may consist of persons who are not also members of the board. These additional committees shall act in an advisory capacity only to the board and shall be clearly titled as "advisory" committees. SECTION 3. MEETINGS AND ACTION OF COMMITTEES Meetings and action of committees shall be governed by, noticed, held and taken in accordance with the provisions of these Bylaws conceming meetings of the Board of Directors, with such changes in the context of such Bylaw provisions as are necessary to substitute the committee and its members for Board of Directors and its members, except that the time for regular meetings of committees may be fixed by resolution of the Board of Directors of by the committee. The time for special meetings of committees may also be fixed by the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors may also adopt rules and regulations pertaining to the conduct of meetings of committees to the extent that such rules and regulations are not inconsistent with the provisions of these Bylaws. ARTICLE 6 - EXECUTION OF INTSTRUMENTS, DEPOSITS AND FUNDS SECTION 1. EXECUTION OF INSTRUMENTS The Board of Directors, except as otherwise provided in these Bylaws, may by resolution authorize any officer or agent of the corporation to enter into any contract or execute and deliver any instrument in the name of and on behalf of the corporation, and such authority may be general or confined to specific instances. Unless so authorized, no officer, agent, or employee shall have any power or authority to bind the corporation by any contract or engagement or to pledge its credit or to render it liable monetarily for any purpose or in any amount. SECTION 2. CItECKS AND NOTES Except as otherwise specifically determined by resolution of the Board of Directors, or as otherwise required by law, checks, drafts, promissory notes, orders for the payment of money, and other evidence of indebtedness of the corporation shall be signed by the Treasurer and countersigned by the Executive Director of the corporation. BYLAWS OF THE HABITAT TRUST FOR WILDLIFE Page 13 of 16 SECTION 3. DEPOSITS All funds of the corporation shall be deposited from time to time to the credit of the corporation in such banks, trust companies, or other depositories as the Executive Director or Board of Directors may selects. SECTION 4. GIFTS The Board of Directors may accept on behalf of the corporation any contribution, gift, bequest, or devise for the charitable or public purposes of the corporation. ARTICLE 7 - CORPORATE RECORDS, REPORTS AND SEAL The corporation shall keep at its principal office in the State of California: (a) Minutes of all meetings of directors, committees of the board and, if this corporation has members, off all meetings of members, indicating the time and place of holding such meetings, whether regular or special, how called, the notice given, and the names of those present and the proceedings thereon; (b) Adequate and correct books and records of account, including accounts of its properties and business transactions and accounts of its assets, liabilities, receipts, disbursements, gains and losses; (c) A record of its contributors, if any, indicating the names and addresses. (d) A copy of the corporation's Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws as amended to date, which shall be open to inspection by contributors, if any, of the corporation at all reasonable times during office hours. SECTION 2. CORPORATE SEAL The Board of Directors may adopt, use, and at will alter, a corporate seal. Such seal shall be kept at the principal office of the corporation. Failure to affix the seal to corporate instruments, however, shall not affect the validity of any such instrument. SECTION 3. DIRECTORS' INSPECTION RIGHTS Every director shall have the absolute right at any reasonable time to inspection and copy all books, records and documents of every kind and to inspect the physical properties of the corporation at their own expense. BYLAWS OF THE HABITAT TRUST FOR WILDLIFE Page 14 of 16 SECTION 4. RIGHT TO COPY AND MAKE EXTRACTS Any inspection under thc provisions of the Article may be made in person or by agent or a~tomey and the right to inspection includes the right to copy and make extracts at their own cost. SECTION 5. ANNUAL REPORT The board shall cause an annual report to be furnished no later than one hundred and twenty (120) days after the close of the corporation's fiscal year to all directors of the corporation and, to any member who requests it in writing, which report shall contain the following information in appropriate detail: (a) The assets and liabilities, including the trust funds, of the corporation as of the end of the fiscal years; (b) The principal changes in assets and liabilities, including trust funds, during the fiscal year; (c) The revenue or receipts of the corporation, both unrestricted and restricted to particular purposes, for the fiscal year; (d) The expenses or disbursements of the corporation, for both general and restricted purposes, during the fiscal year; (e) Any information required by Section 7 of the Article. The annual report shall be accompanied by any report thereon of independent accountant, or if there is no such report, the certificate of an authorized officer of the corporation that such statements were prepared without audit from the books and records of the corporation. ARTICLE 8 - FISCAL YEAR SECTION 1. FISCAL YEAR OF THE CORPORATION The fiscal year of the corporation shall begin on the first day of January and end on the last day of December in each year. ARTICLE 9 - AMENDMENT OF BYLAWS SECTION 1. AMENDMENT Subject to any provision of law applicable to the amendment of Bylaws of public benefit nonprofit corporations, these Bylaws, or any of them, may be altered, amended, or repealed and new Bylaws adopted as follows: BYLAWS OF THE HABITAT TRUST FOR WILDLIFE Page 15 of 16 (a) Subject to the power of members, if any, to change or repeal these Bylaws under Section 5150 of the Corporations Code, by approval of the Board of Directors unless the Bylaw amendment would materially and adversely affect the rights of members, if any, as to voting or transfer, provided, however, if this corporation has admitted any members, then a Bylaw specifying or changing the fixed number of directors of the corporation, the maximum or minimum number of directors, or changing from a fixed to variable board or vice versa, may not be adopted, amended, or repealed except as provided in subparagraph (b) of this Section. ARTICLE 10 - AMENDMENT OF ARTICLES SECTION 1. AMENDMENT OF ARTICLES BEFORE ADMISSION OF MEMBERS Before any members have been admitted to the corporation, any amendment of the Articles of Incorporation may be adopted by approval of the Executive Director or Board of Directors. SECTION 2. AMENDMENT OF ARTICLES AFTER ADMISSION OF MEMBERS After members, if any, have been admitted to the corporation, amendment of the Articles of Incorporation may be adopted by the approval of the Executive Director or Board of Directors and by the approval of the members of this corporation. SECTION 3. CERTAIN AMENDMENTS Notwithstanding the above Sections of this Article, this corporation shall not amend its Articles of Incorporation to alter any statement which appears in the original Articles of Incorporation and of the names and addresses of the first directors of the corporation or the name and address of its initial agent, except to correct an error in such statement or to delete either statement after the corporation has filed a "Statement by a Domestic Non-Profit Corporation" pursuant to Section 6210 of the California Nonprofit Corporation Law. ARTICLE 11 - PROHIBITION AGAINST SHARING CORPORATE PROFITS AND ASSETS SECTION 1. PROHIBITION AGAINST SHARING CORPORATE PROFITS AND ASSETS No member, director, officer, employee, or other person connected with this corporation, or any private individual, shall receive at any time any of the net earnings or pecuniary profit from the operations of the corporation, provided, however, that this provision shall not prevent payment to any such person or reasonable compensation for services performed for BYLAWS OF THE HABITAT TRUST FOR WILDLIFE Page 16 of 16 the corporation in effecting any of its public or charitable purposes and no such person or persons shall be entitled to share in the distribution of, and shall not receive, any of the corporate assets on dissolution of the corporation. All members, if any, of the corporation shall be deemed to have expressly consented and agreed that on such dissolution or winding up of the affairs of the corporation, after all debts have been satisfied, shall be distributed as required by the Articles of Incorporation of this corporation and not otherwise. SECTION 2. - IDENTIFIED BOARD OF DIRECTORS Executive Director, Leeona Klippstein President, Dolores Welty Vice President, Steve Sugarman Secretary, Kathy Knight Treasurer, Ouida Newell STATEMENT OF INCORPORATION I, Leeona Klippstein, hereby adopt the foregoing bylaws for the corporation of The Habitat Trust For Wildlife pursuant to California Corporation Code Section 5134. DATED: May 26, 2002 Leeona Klippstein, Incorporator EXHIBIT 3 INTERNAL SRVENU~ SERVICE DSPARTMENT OF THE T~ASURY P, O. BOX 2508 CINCI~ATI, OH 4S201 ~mploFer Id~ntifica~ion Nu~er: OCT 0.8 2003 D~N: THE H~ITAT TRUST ~R WILDLIFE Con,act P~reon: C/O LEEONA ~I~PSTEI~ ~L~R N C~ ID~ 31~21 439 WESTWOOD ~HOPPINO CEdaR Contact Telephone Nu~er: FAYETTEVILLE, NC 28314 (877~ 829-5500 Acco~tin~ Peri~ Ending: Dece~er 31 Fo~ 990 Add=ndum No __ Dear Applicant: Eased on information supplied, and assuming your operations will be as stated in your application for recognition of exemption, we have determined you are exempt from federal income tax under section 501(a) of the Internal Revenue Code as an organization described in section 501(c)(3). We have further determined that you are not a private foundation wi=bin the meaning of section ~09(a) of the Code, because you are an organization described in sections $09(a)(1) and 170(b)(1)(A)(vi). If your sources of support, or your purposes, character, or method of operation change, please let us know sb we can consider the effect of the change on your exempt statue and fo~mdation status. In the case of an amend- men= to your organisational document or bylaws, please send us a copy of the amended document or bylaws. Also, you should inform ua of all changes in your name or ad'tess. As of January 1, 1984, you are liable for taxes under the Federal Insurance Contributions Act (social security taxes) on remuneration of $100 or more you pay to each of your employees during a calendar year. You are not liable for the tax imposed under the Federal Unemployment Tax Act {~TA). Since you are not a private foundation, you are not subject to the excise taxes ~der Chapter 42 of the Code. However, if you are involved in an excess benefit transaction, t~at transaction might be s~Jec~ to the excise taxes of section 4~8. Additionally, you are not automatically exe~t fro~ other federal ~cise taxes. If you have any ~estions ~out other fete=al =axes, please con~ac~ your key dietric~ office. ~rantors and contrihu~oro may rely on this dete~ina~ion In~ernal Revenue Se~ice p~lishea no,ice to the con~ra~. ~owev~r, if you lose ~our section ~09(a) (~} statue, a grantor or oontribu~or may no~ xely on this dete~nati~n if h~ or she was in part responsible ~o~, or was aware of, ~he aot or failure to ac~, or tbs s~etantial or materia~ chan~e on the Letter 947 (DO/CG) THE HABITAT TRUST FOR WILDLIF~ part of the organization that resulted in your loss of such status, or if he or she acquired k~owledge that the Internal Revenue Service had given notice that you would no longer be classified as a section $09(a) (1) organization. Donors may deduot contributions to you as provided in section 170 of the Code. Bequests, legacies, devises, transfers, or gifts to you or for your use are deductible for federal estate and gift tax purposes if they meet the applicable provisions Of Code sections 20SS, 2106, and 2522. Contribution deductions are allowable =o donors only to the extent that their contributions are gifts, with no consideration received. Ticket pur- chases and similar payments in conjunction w/th fundraising events may not necessarily qualify as deductible contributions, depending o~% =he circum- stances. See Revenue Ruling 67-246, published in Cumulative Bulletin 1967-2, on page 104, which sets forth guidelines regsrdin~ the deductibility, as chari- table contributions, of payments made by taxpayers for admission to or othsr participation in fundraising activities for charity. In the heading of this letter we have indicated whether you must file Form 990, Return of Organization Exempt From Income Tax. ~f Yea is indicated, you are required to file Form 990 only if your gross receipts each year are normally more than $25,000. However, if you receivs a Form 990 package in the mail, please file the return even if you do not exceed the gross receipts test. If you are not required to file, simply attach the label provided, check the box in the heading to indicate that your annual gross receipts are normally $25,000 or less, and sign the return. If a return is required, it must be filed by the 15th day Of the fifth ,,, month after the end of your annual accounting period. A penalty of $20 a day is char~ed when a return is filed late, unless there is reasonable cause for the delay. However, the maxi~m penalty charged cannot exceed $10,000 or 5 percent of your gross receipts for the year, whichever is less. For organizations with gross receipts exceeding $1,000,000 in any year, the penalty is $100 per day per return, unless there is reasonable cause for the delay. The maximum penalty for an organization with gross receipts exceeding $1,000,000 shall not exceed $$0,000. This penalty may also be chargsd if s return is not complete, so be sure your return is complete before you file it. You are required to make your annual information return, Form 990 or Form 990-EZ, available for public inspection for three Fears after the later of the due date of the return or the date the return is filed. You are also required to make available for public inspection your exemption application, any supporting documents, and your exemption letter. Copies of these documents are also required to be provided to any individual upon written or in person request without charge other than reasonable fees for copyin~ and postage. You may fulfill this requirement by placing these documents on ~he Internet. ~enalt~es may be imposed for failure to comply w/th these requirements. Additional information is available in Publication 557, Tax-Exempt Status for Your Organization, or you may call our toll free number shown above. Letter 947 (DO/CG) THE HABITAT TRUST FOR WILDLIFE You are not re~ired to file federal income tax returns unless you are subject to the tax on unrelatsd business income under section 511 of the Code. If you are subject ~o this tax, you must file an income tax return on Form 990-T, Exempt Organization Bus/ness Income Tax Return. In this letter we are not determining whether any of your present or proposed activities are unre- lated trade or business as defined in section 513 of the Code. You need an employer identification number even if you have no employees. If an employer identification number was not entered on your application, a number will he assigned to you and you will be advised of it. Please use that number on all returns you file and in all correspondence with the Intornal Revenue Service. If we have indicated in the heading of this letter that an addendum applies, the enclosed addendum is an tnte~ral part of this letter. Because this letter could help resolve any questions ~bout your exempt status and foundation status, you should keep it in your Permanent records. We have sent a copy of this letter to your representative as indicated in your power of attorney. If you have any questions, please contact the person whose name and telephone number are shown in the heading of this letter. Sincerely yours, Director, Exempt Organizations Rulings and Agreements Letter 947 (DO/CG) EXHIBIT 4 THE HABITAT TRUST May 5, 2002 Accomplishments ~ Articles of Incorporation - Bylaws signed ~ Received 134-acres and $125,000.00 from Sage Council legal settlement with UCP Inc. over University/Rancho Etiwanda Development ~ Developed budget blueprint - 2001 and 2002 ~ Completed Procedures for Donating Land - on web site ~ Approved By-laws amendments ~ Developed Land Acquisition Criteria - on web site ~ Identified SW comer of North Etiwanda Creek Nature Sanctuary ~ Consensus on land management strategy - "hands off" approach, signs ~ Acquired aerial photo and large blow up of Nature Sanctuary area ~ Obtained Copy of CAPP proposal submitted by City of Rancho Cucamonga ~ Joined LTA - Insurance 2001 ~ Requested membership to North Etiwanda Reserve Committee as voting member to the County and was denied ~ Leeona attended LTA workshop on conservation easements, VA ~ Frank attended LTA workshop on fundraising, IL ~ Leeona and Dolores attended LTA national convention, MD ~ Leeona attended LTA Pacific conference, CA ~ Developed and Printed brochures ~ Business cards made ~ Comment letter on Crest/Rancho Cucamonga Estates submitted ~ Received State incorporation, Federal Employment ID ~ Dissolved project and bank accounts under S.E.E. ~ Opened a bank account with B orA ~ Developed Web site and placed on Interact along with 2 web addresses ~ Received $10,000.00 installment from Sage Council settlement with City of Rancho Cueamonga over Crest/Rancho Etiwanda Estates ~ Grant application to Patagonia and Turner ~ Standard Business Practices - Adopted LTA Standards and Practices ~ Personnel changes to Board of Directors ~ Volunteers to field check and report on Nature Sanctuaries Projects in Development (Current Action Items) ~ 501©3 Tax Exempt Status ~ Letters to property owners introducing ourselves and offering assistance to conservation sellers - Draft completed by Dolores and Frank ~ Letter of introduction to DFG/USFWS and other government agencies ~ Long Range Vision of Organization (and strategic plan) ~ Receivership of 174-acres and $350,000.00 per Sage Council settlement with A&J Resources over CrestJRancho Etiwanda Estates in City of Rancho Cucamonga ~ Grant application to Home Depot for Nature Sanctuary sign posting and info area construction supplies and equipment - Leeona ~ Land Inventory and Priority Acquisitions Discussion Items ~ Hire a CPA to keep books up-to-date monthly ($50.00 x 12 = $600.00) and annual tax filing EXHIBIT 5 HA B- TAT ] TRUST The Habitat Trust for Wildlife Nailing: 439 Westwood SC #144, Fayetteville, NC 28314 Southwest USA: Scandia Bldg, 30 North Raymond Avenue, Suite 303, Pasadena, CA 9:1103 Southeast USA: Ecology Center, 106 Rockingham Street, Carthage, NC 28327 Phone: (626) 676-4116 and (910) 947-5091 www.TheHa bitatTrust.orq QUALIFICATIONS A Recognized Califomia Corporation U.S. Department of Treasury, Internal Revenue Service Identified 509 (a) (1) and 501 (c) (3) status given on October 8, 2003 with prior status as of January 1, 1984. E1N# 04-3637770 A Sponsor Member of the Land Trust Alliance since 2000. A 2004 Recognized Blue Ribbon "Ambassador of Standards and Practices" nationwide for the 1,300 member organizations of the Land Trust Alliance. We do not allow Trespassing, Off Road Vehicles, Motorcycles, Shooting, Hunting, Equestrians and Dogs Off Leash on our Nature Sanctuaries. We encourage scientific studies and publications that assist in furthering the conservation of rare, threatened and endangered species, including their habitats. We photograph, monitor, map and report baseline habitat quality and changes occurring in and adjacent to our Nature Sanctuaries. We support legal actions and take legal actions as needed to protect our Nature Sanctuaries. We have access to a number of volunteer and hired qualified biologists and naturalists to assist in the management and conservation of our Nature Sanctuaries and the species that reside and migrate to the area. We actively seek out prospective land donors and identify lands that could contribute to the growth of our Nature Sanctuaries. FINANCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY Our annual accounting of finances and tax reporting is performed by a former 1RS agent and current tax accounting company, Dennis Rickman & Associates, Hope Mills, North Carolina that is independent of our organization. We seek, write, and obtain, grant proposals, seek memberships and benefactors. PUBLIC OUTREACH We have a website that provides detailed information, including our Mission Statement, How to Donate Lands, Habitat types that we are interested in acquiring. BOARD OF DIRECTORS We have over forty years experience in community relations, social justice and environmental activism, and include: President, £eeona Klippstein has over fourteen years experience as a conservation leader. Co- founded the nonprofit wildlife conservation organization "Spirit ofthe Sage Council'" enforcing' environmental regulations and successfully protecting over 2,000-acres of globally imperiled habitats. U.S. House of Representatives recognized expert, and invited speaker on Habitat Conservation Planning. A selected Advisory Committee Member of Western Riverside County's Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan. Vice President, Doug Doepke, PhD has been a Board Member of County of Los Angeles Nature Centers since 1991. He served as President from 1991 - 1995 and has been the Vice President from 1997 - 2004. Secretary, Marleen Trunnell is a member of the Cherokee Nation with over 30 years experience working with various nonprofit and grassroots organizations, including those that are recovery wolf populations. A member and spokesperson of Spirit of the Sage Council for over a decade. EDUCATION We support continuing education of our Board Members and consultants in conservation issues and organizational interests, programs and capital campaigns. EXHIBIT 6 NORTH ETIWANDA CREEK NATURE SANCTUARY This Nature Sanctuary is 135-acres of canyon riparian, riversidean sage scrub, cismontane and forest habitat within the San Bemardino National Forest on the coastal facing easterly San Gabriel Mountains, San Bemardino, California. (See USGS Cucamonga Quad Section 9, SW ¼ section) From the southwestern comer of the Nature Sanctuary, below an ancient oak tree and from the canyon wall facing the vistas of the San Gabriel Mountains is a biologically diverse alluvial wash. Sage scrub and yucca lanterns meet California walnut, White alder, Pines in a lush and pristine riparian habitat. Further north in the North Etiwanda Creek Nature Sanctuary is a beautiful waterfall and rock formation that sustains ferns and other plants that grow in the soil of crevices. Following the steep northeastern Etiwanda Creek drainage up into the San Gabriels, the riparian woodlands become more dense with tree canopies until the mountain peak opens. The Nature Sanctuary crosses over the peak into the next drainage to the east - Henderson Canyon. The water flows from both of these headwaters south down the creeks, across the Day/Etiwanda/Henderson/San Sevain alluvial fan ecosystem and onward to the Santa Ana River which flows to meet the Pacific Ocean at Newport Back Bay, Orange County, California. The majority of this Nature Sanctuary is forest, cismontane, riparian and riversidean alluvial sage scrub habitat. The highest elevation is 3325 feet and the lowest is 2400 feet. The habitat throughout is intact having kept its pristine character regardless of an unpaved and non-maintained Forest Service firebreak road that meanders between canyons. To access the Nature Sanctuary one must have a key to a series of locked gates that are only available for access by The Habitat Trust, San Bemardino Natural History Museum biologists, Chaffey College biology instructors, State and Federal wildlife authorities and the local water company. No motorized vehicles, shooting, hunting, horses or dogs are allowed in the Nature Sanctuary or the 762-acre North Etiwanda Preserve that is to the immediate southwest. Human disturbance of plants and animals on the Nature Sanctuary is discouraged. The Habitat Trust shall not be held responsible for those people who enter Nature Sanctuary without authorization. People wishing to enter the Nature Sanctuary for educational, scientific research or spiritual renewal may contact The Habitat Trust for permission. In this way The Habitat Trust can maintain the integrity of the habitat for plants and animals. SPECIES INVENTORY - It is the policy of The Habitat Trust £or Wildlife to compile a list o£ species that are known and/or expected to occur within the Nature Sanctuaries. This species list may be derived from surveys past or present, published or unpublished and may be updated as new species in£ormation is made available. The Board o£Directors may hire a qualified botanist and/or biologist on occasions when funding for such specified activities are available and/or needed. The following is a partial list of other rare animal species that have been confirmed or have moderate to high occurrence of probability in the area: Arroyo southwestern toad (Bufo microscaphus californicus) FE/CSC/SP Western spadefoot toad (Scaphiopus hammondii) FSC/CSC/SP Califomia red-legged frog (Rana aurora draytonii) FT/CSC/SP Mountain yellow-legged frog (Rana muscosa) FPE/CSC/SP Coast range newt (Taricha torosa torosa) CSC Yellow-blotched salamander (Ensatina eschscholtziicroceator) CSC Arroyo chub (Gila orcutt0 CSC Santa Ana speckled dace (Rhinichthys oscultus ssp.3) FSC/CSC Santa Ana sucker (Catostomus santaanae) FPT San Diego banded gecko (Coleonyx variegatus abbottiO CSC San Diego homed lizard (Phrynosoma coronatium blainvillei) FSC/CSC/SP Coastal Rosy boa (Lichanura trivirgata rosafusca) FSC/CSC San Bemardino mountain king snake (Lampropeltis zonata parvirubra) FSC/CSC San Bemardino ring-neck snake (Diadophis punctatus modestus) FSC Coast Patch-nosed snake (Salvadora hexalepis virgultea) FSC/CSC Two-striped garter snake (Thamnophis hammondi0 FSC/CSC/SP California Legless lizard (Aniella pulchra) CSC Coastal western whiptail (Cnemidophorus tigris multiscutatus) FSC Night snake, Western Yellowbelly Racer snake Western skink Southern Alligator lizard. Ash-throated Flycatcher Ashy rufous-crowned sparrow (Aimophila ruficeps canescens) CSC Anna's Hummingbird Acorn Woodpecker American Kestrel American Goldfinch Barn Owl Barn Swallow Bell's sage sparrow (Amphispiza belli bell0 CSC Bewick's Wren Brewer's Blackbird Brewer's Sparrow Black-chinned Sparrow Burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia hypugea) FSC/CSC Band-tailed Pigeon Black-chinned Hummingbird Belted Kingfisher Black shouldered Kite Black Phoebe Black Throated, Gray Warbler Black-headed Grosbeak Blue-gray Gnatcatcher Blue Grosbeak California Gnatcatcher FT California Quail California Thrasher California Towhee Cactus wren (Campylorhynchus brunneicapilIus) CSC FE Cassin's Kingbird Cedar Waxwing Chipping sparrow Cliff Swallow Common Snipe Cooper's hawk (Accipiter cooperi) CSC Costa's Hummingbird Common Raven Common Crow Common Bushtit Canyon Wren Downy Woodpecker Dusky Flycatcher Ferruginous Hawk Golden eagle (Aquila chrysaetos) CSC/SFP Great Blue Heron Great homed Owl Greater Roadrunner Hairy Woodpecker Hammond's Flycatcher Homed lark (Erernophilus alpestris actia) CSC House Sparrow Killdeer Least Bell's Vireo FE Lesser Nighthawk Loggerhead shrike (Lanius ludovicianus) CSC Long-eared owl (Asio otus) CSC Mallard Duck Mountain quail (Oreotyxpicta) CSC Mourning Dove Northern Flicker Northern hanSer (Circus cyaneus) CSC Nuttall's Woodpecker Olive-sided Flycatcher Pacific Slope Flycatcher Peregrine Falcon FE Poorwill Prairie Falcon Red-breasted Sapsucker Red-tailed Hawk Rock Dove Rough winged Swallow Rufous Hummingbird Say's Phoebe Sharp-shinned hawk (Accipiter straighus) CSC Short-eared Owl Sora Rail Southwestern Willow flycatcher FE Turkey Vulture Western Screech Owl White-throated Swift Western Kingbird Western wood Pewee Violet-green Swallow Steller's Jay Scrub Jay Mountain Chickadee Oak Titmouse White-breasted Nuthatch Dipper House Wren Rock Wren Ruby-crowned Kinglet Mockingbird Hermit Thrush Robin Western Bluebird Wrentit Phainopepla Loggerhead Shrike Hutton's Vireo Warbling Vireo Orange-crowned Warbler Nashville Warbler Yellow Warbler Wilson's Warbler Yellow-romped Warbler Yellowthroat Warbler Western Meadowlark Northern Oriole Hooded Oriole Westem Tanager Lazuli Bunting House Finch Pine Siskin Lesser Goldfinch Spotted Towhee Vesper Sparrow Lark Sparrow Rufous-crowned Sparrow Bell's Sage Sparrow Dark-eyed Junco White-crowned Sparrow Golden-crowned Sparrow Song Sparrow Vaux's swift (Chaetura vaux0 CSC Yellow warbler (Dendroica petechia) CSC Brown-headed Cowbird (non-native) European Starling (non-native) San Diego black-tailed jackrabbit (Lepus californicus bennettiO CSC Los Angeles pocket mouse (Perognathus longimembris brevinasus) FSC/CSC San Diego pocket mouse (Chaetodipusfallax) FSC/CSC San Diego desert woodrat OVeotoma lepida intermedia) FSC/CSC Southern grasshopper mouse (Onychomys torridus ramona) FSC/CSC American badger (Taxidea taxus) SA Ringtail cat (Bassariscus astutus octarus) SFP Mountain lion (Fells concolor) SP Pallid bat (Antrozous pallidus) CSC Townsend's big-eared bat (Plecotus townsendii townsendii) FSC/CSC Yuma myotis (Yuma myotis) FSC/CSC Rare plant species confirmed or that have high probability of occurrence in the proposed planning area: Many-stemmed dudleya (Dudleya multicaulis) lB Plummer's mariposa lily (Calochortusplummerae) lB Slender-homed spineflower (Dodecahema leptoceras) FE, SE, lB -4- 2]6 Party's spineflower (Chorizanthe parryi ver. parryi) 3 Pious daisy (Erigeron breweri var. bisanctus) lB Califomia muhly (Muhlenbergia californica) 1B Ashy spike-moss (Selaginella cinerascens) 4 Plummer's bacchads (Baccharis plummerae ssp. Plummerae) 4 Nevin's barberry (Berberis neviniO FE, SE, lB Southern California black walnut (Juglans californica var. californica) 4 Rock monardella (Monardella virdis ssp. saxicloa) 4 California androsace (Adrosace elongata ssp. acuta) 4 LITERATURE REFERENCES BIRDS OF DAY CANYON 1981- 2001, San Bemardino Co., CA. Unpublished surveys compiled by James des Lanriers, Department o£Biology, Chaf£ey College, Alta Loma, CA 91737. VERTIBRATES OF DAY CANYON 1987, San Bemardino Co., CA. Unpublished surveys compiled by James des Lauriers, Department o£Biology, Chaffey College, Alta Loma, CA 91737. PLANTS OF DAY CANYON edited 1995, Unpublished surveys compiled by James des Lauriers, Department of Biology, Charley College, Alta Loma, CA 91737.Contributors to this list; Greg Bartman, David Bixler, Rose Ann Cobos, Deborah Dorsett, Jeff Glazner, Michelle Havener, Robert Muns, Michele Myers, Jean Nelson, Wally Spaulding, Robert Thorne, Diana Six, John F. Wear, Nathan T Moorhatch, [Gerald Benny & Colin Wainwright 1971 (Students of Robert Thorne)], Steve Fischer = ~, CSU, Los Angeles (1995), Jack Easton = #. Tierra Madre Consultants. "BIRDS, VERTEBRATES AND PLANTS FOUND IN CANYONS OF THE SAN GABRIEL MOUNTAINS, CA" 1996, unpublished USFWS database, provided by James Bums. -5- EXHIBIT 7 .2/8 RIVERSIDE OFFICE 4280 Latham Street, Suite C  Riverside, CA 92501 HOGLE-IRELAND 95,,787-9222 ~ FAX (951) 781-6014 www. hogleireland, com A La,d PlamKng ~'~ Develol)ment ConsuIting Firm CITY OF RANOHO CI-iCAIVIONGA TRANSMITTAL TO: Larry Henderson DATE: NNovUeVm ble 71 t~,%4 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department PROJECT NO: RE~,~'Fr) - PLANNING PROJECT: Henderson Creek FROM: Pam Steele E-MAIL ADDRESS: psteele~hoqleireland.com TRANSMITTED BY: [] Fax X Hand Delivered by Lori Shriver [] Overnight Mail/Delivery [] By Mail By QUANTITY DESCRIPTION 1 Original letter from Granite Homes to Brad Bullet dated November 3, 2004 X For your information and files Per your request [] URGENT [] For your approval [] For your review [] For Submittal/Resubmittal COMMENTS: Larry, This letter is to provide certainty that the mitigation property will be conveyed to an appropriate conservation entity. We appreciate the City's support for this project and look lo.yard to the completion of the annexation process. Please call if you have any questions, 909-787-9222. Thanks, Pam Cc: Steve Stewart- 714-839-8470 Dorian Johnson - 949-250-9231 Roger Grable- 714-371-2550 Tim Johnson - 909-945-4037 GRANITE HOMES o, 700 Irvine, CA 92614 Building Quality For A Lifetime 949.250.9229 Fax 949.250.9231 November 3, 2004 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Brad Bullet City Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 flECEIVCD - PLANNING Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-0807 Re: Open Space Transfer Plan - Henderson Creek Dear Mr. Buller, The purpose of our letter is to advise you that Rancho 2004, LLC (with Granite Homes as its manager) has acquired the interest of Henderson Creek Properties, LLC, in the property which is the subject of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT 16324 and the related development approvals received from the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Please copy us with all further correspondence relating to these approvals. We also wish to advise you that we are in receipt of a copy of your letter dated October 7, 2004, addressed to Pam Steele of Hogle-Ireland, and we have passed the request for information on to the Habitat Trust for Wildlife, Inc (thc "Habitat Trust"). As of this point we have not received a response from them. We will continue to ~vork with them to supply the requested information. The purpose of this letter is to advise you that if the Habitat Trust refuses to accept the conveyance of the property to be acquired for mitigation, or to manage the property as required by Mitigation Measure BIO-1, or fails to provide sufficient information which would enable the City to determine whether the Habitat Trust is a suitable manager of the property to be acquired for mitigation purposes in accordance with Mitigation Measure BIO-1, or if the Habitat Trust is found to be unsuitable by the City we, as the property owner, would then intend to comply with the provisions of Mitigation Measure BIO-1 by transferring the property to be acquired for mitigation to the County Special District OS-1 as referenced in Mitigation Measure BIO-1. We have contacted the Special District and are in the process of acquiring the necessary documents from them should this course of action prove necessary. Granite Homes Cc: Paul Biane " " D .,vE.s,oE o F, cE HOGL 4280 Latham Street, Suite C Riverside, CA 92501 A Land Plctnning [~ Development Consulting Firm (951 ) 787-9222 FAX (951) 781-6014 www. hogleireland, com TRANSMITTAL TO: Larry Henderson DATE: November 24, 2004 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division PROJECT NO: 1512 PROJECT: Henderson Creek FROM: Pam Steele E-MAIL ADDRESS: psteele@hogleireland.com TRANSMITTED BY: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Fax X Hand Delivered By Alex Steele Overnight Mail/Delivery By Mail NOV 2 4 2~0~' QUANTITY DESCRIPTION RECEIVED - PLANNING 1 package Information from The Habitat Trust Including: Letter to Roger Grable from Craig Sherman dated November 15, 2004(received 11/22/04) w/exhibits: 1. Minutes from November 1,2004 Board meeting 2. 2003 Attachment to Form 990 3. Independent Auditor's Report 4. The Habitat Trust for Wildlife Nature Sanctuaries Management Plan For your information X Per your request URGENT For your approval X For your review For Submittal/Resubmittal COMMENTS: Larry, These additional items are being submitted in response to our request to The Habitat Trust to provide the information and materials requested in Brad Buffer's letter dated October 7, 2004. Mr. Sherman's response letter is also included. Based on the materials submitted on November 15 and these items, it appears that there are still three (3) items listed in the City's letter to be provided. They are as follows, numbered as shown on the City letter: 7. List of Board Members of the Trust. 8. Personnel - employees or volunteers who would be actively involved in the management of the property. 9. Operations Plan/Maintenance Schedule. We will notify The Habitat Trust that these items are required. And as soon as we receive them, we will provide them to you. If you have any questions in the interim, please call me at (951) 787-9222 cc: Steve Stewart, Henderson Creek LLC Dorian Johnson, Granite Homes Roger Grable, Manatt, Phelps, & Phillips w/o attachments - via facsimile 714-371-2550 CRAIG A. SHERMAN ~ ~ O E ~ ~' E' D A'UrORNEY AT LAW NOV 2 2 2004 SHE~MANLAW~ AOL COM November 15, 2004 FACSIMILE TELEPHONE (619) 702-7892 (619) 702-9291 Via Facsimile (714) 371-2550 Followed by Overnight Mail Roger A. Grable, Esq. MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS 695 Town Center, 14th Floor Costa Mesa, California 92626 Re: Further Information Regarding The Habitat Trust Qualifications Henderson Creek Properties, Mitigation Lands The following responds to the 6 queries set forth in your email dated November 11, 2004 regarding the qualifications, acceptance of mitigation lands, and management activities of The Habitat Trust's (THT): No. 2 The THT board of directors had prior knowledge of the terms of the Settlement Agreement and acceptance of the Henderson Creek mitigation land, and on November 1, 2004, at its Annual Meeting discussed and ratified the same. A copy of THT's minutes from its Annual Meeting is enclosed (1 p.). No. 4 The Habitat Trust received their 501(c)(3) status in 2003 and that was the primary official IRS tax filing thus far. THT hired the tax accounting services of Dennis Rickman & Associates for that filing. As far as the 2003 tax filings, I was able to obtain the attachments to IRS Form 990 and the profit loss statement for FY 2003. These are very detailed and should be sufficient and I have enclosed them herewith (4 pp.). No annual report or independent audit has yet been finalized for FY 2003. An independent audit was conducted for FY 2002, when the THT was a subsidiary of its predecessor entity Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs, Inc., a copy of SEE, Inc.'s California Form 199 (10 pp.) and the Independent Auditor's Report (7 pp.) is enclosed herewith. Page Two November 15, 2004 Roger A. Grable, Esq. Nos. 5 and 9 The referenced "Land Management Strategy" is very basic. Land trusts can choose whether or not to implement intensive or non-intensive management depending upon the habitat type, species needs and parcel location. THT has chosen a mix of both, i.e., since the parcels are I close proximity to the National Forest and residential development there will be non-intensive weed abatement and/or vegetation bums, however, non-native plant removal may be eradicated by hand. Priority management strategies of THT are to focus on Protecting Lands from Human related impacts - e.g., keeping out motorized vehicles, shooters,/hunters, equestrians, and dumping. A copy of THT's management plan (19 pp.) and monitoring form (9 pp.) are enclosed herewith. No. 7 The board members of THT have changed since the last tax filing. These include Leeona Klippstein (president), Doug Doepke (vice president) and Marlene Tmnnell (Secretary). The board may be made up of three persons, and no more than six. The website for THT has not been updated and reflects only the names of the original board members. (See, enclosed Annual Minutes (1 p.). No. 8 The board members and volunteers participate in monitoring the Nature Sanctuaries of THT. THT does not have "employees" but instead hires consultants as independent contractors as needed. If you have any questions regarding the above or you require any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Craig A. Sherman Enclosures The Habitat Trust for Wildlife 2004 Annual Board Meeting November 1, 2004 Meeting Place: Courtyard by Marriott, Providence, Rhode Island Time: 10:15 AM Present: Leeona Klippstein, Doug Doepke, Marlene Trunnell Agenda 1. Budget Report - Attached Proposed 2004-2005 Armual Budget of $140,000. 2. Secretary Report - No new business 3. Old Business - None 4. New Business - a. Motion to Adopt Land Trust Alliance (LTA) Revised Standards and Practices. Approved Unanimously. b. Motion to Assert that President of Board is not a paid position, but post of Executive Director is a paid position. Approval would bring THT into compliance with LTA Standards and Practices. Approved Unanimously. c. Motion to clarify that pos of President does not include function of acting as a Treasurer. In lieu of Treasurer, TIlT will hire a tax accountant to file year end tax report to IRS. Approved Unanimously. d. Motion to clarify that Executive Director is responsible for administrative and banking tasks in lieu of a Board Treasurer. Approved Unanimously. e. Motion to erect effective signage at THT Nature Sanctuaries. Approved Unanimously. L Motion to hold a regular meeting later this month, November, to further clarify and organize TIlT needs. Approved Unanimously. g. Motion to hold next year's annual board meeting at LTA Rally. Rejected Unanimously. h. Motion to automatically accept mitigation lands, as Nature Sanctuaries, from Spirit of the Sage Council litigation subject to consistency with THT Criteria and Procedures for land receivership. Approved Unanimously. ADJOURNED 11:17 AM Minutes: Marlene Trunnell BITAT The Habitat Trust for Wildlife Mailing: 439 Westwood SC #144, Fayettevllle,.NC 28314 Southwest USA: Scandia Bldg, 30 North Raymond Avenue, Suite 303, Pasadena, CA 91103 Southeast USA: Ecology Center, 106 Rocklngham Street, Carthage, NC 28327 Phone: (626) 676-4116 and (910) 947-5091 · , www.TheHa bitatTrust.o~ [RS EID# 04-3637770 2003 ATTACHMENT to FORM 990 Return of Organization Exempt From Income Tax Part III Statement of Program Service Accomplishments Number of clients served - The conservation work of The Habitat Trust serves hundreds of known and . unknown rare, threatened and endangered species of plants and animals. The habitat lands (over 300- acres of Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub (RAFSS) and Riparian natural communities), that we hold in fee title and administer or care for, are within a region of Southern California and the Earth identified by scientists and conservationists as a global "hot spot" of biodiversity. Through acquisition of imperiled habitat lands and giving nature sanctuary, our organization is serving all of humanity, now and for future generations. When we give nature sanctuary, we are in essence allowing biodiversity, along with natural genetic exchanges, to continue as undisturbed as possible. Giving Nature Sanctuary in California and throughout the United States is our service. The Habitat Trust continued to be a member of the tax -exempt organization, Land Trust Alliance, providing membership fees/dues. In regards to "clients" and/or individual persons, we provided needed assistance to the conservation organization, Spirit of the Sage Council, that is a project of the 501c3 Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs (95-4116679) by accepting habitat lands and funding that were included in an out-of- court settlement (Spirit of the Sage Council v. City of Rancho Cucamonga and A & J Resources). Spirit of the Sage Counoil legally challenged a residential development project (Rancho Etiwanda Estates or "Crest") of A & J Resources that was. approved by the City. As a result of enforcement of environmental laws, City and A & J Resources agreed to settle out-of-court and provide additional mitigation of impacts to habitat caused by the development. Spirit of the Sage Council directed the habitat mitigation lands and funding to The Habitat Trust for Wildlife. In turn, our organization covered legal expenses to have a conservation easement placed on the habitat lands and included in our Nature Sanctuaries at Etiwanda and Henderson Canyons. In an informal partnership with Spirit of the Sage THE HABITAT TRUST FOR NVILDLIFE (IRS EID# 04-3637770) YEAR 2003. ATTACH1VLENT to FORM 990 Return of Organization Exempt From Income Tax 2 of 2 Council, The Habitat Trust for Wildlife also accepted the funding to administer the care of the habitat lands for conservation purposes and associated costs to do so. Publications issued - Several hundred of our organization brochures were printed and distributed. Achievements - (see above, Clients served.) In addition, The Habitat Trust, joined with Spirit of the Sage Council, opened an office in the Southeastern United States to work from and provide an Ecology Center. The Habitat Trust currently pays rent for three offices - 30 North Raymond Avenue #303, Pasadena, CA and two rooms/offices at 106 Roekingham Street, Carthage, NC, referred to as The Ecology Center. The Ecology Center will provide office space to two or more nonprofit organizations dedicated to conserving imperiled habitats and wildlife. Besides the work office, the Ecology Center will also provide for a full-time resident and part-time intern with two bedrooms, kitchen, living room and exercise/healing room. In addition, the ~A-acre grounds of the Ecology Center includes an organic vegetable and flower gardens that are a work in progress as the grass/lawn is removed and replaced by native plants, trees and gardens of vegetables and flowers. Within the past year we have established three raised organic vegetable beds, planted twenty ~even native trees and four flower beds of primarily : native wildflowers and drought tolerant hardy perennials The Ecology Center is in a small rural and historic town of Carthage, the capital of Moore County, North Carolina. The Ecology Center is an old Victorian style house built in 1920, located in the historic district and across the street fi'om a museum, park and elementary school. The house and land are owned by Leeona Klippstein who is the full-time resident and conservationist. Once all repairs and renovations are complete at the Ecology Center, The Habitat Trust will hold events and socials to ~ncourage local landowners to conserve and donate habitat lands, such as wetlands and imperiled long-leaf pine forests./lnother vision and goal of the Ecology Center is to be able to "go off the grid" by becoming a self-sustainable and solar powered. Achievements not measurable - The Habitat Trust continues to research the location of land parcels and their landowners to become more aware of who might be a donor or willing seller of habitat lands needing conservation. Our organization has had an ongoing need to cover legal fees and expenses for legal counsel to meet with prospective land donors. Some of these meetings have not yet come to bear the fruits of conservation, yet we are hopeful that additional habitat lands and funds will be given to our organization in 2004. Part VII 103 Other Revenue There were no other revenues, other than those reported. Part VIII Relationship of Activities to the Accomplishment of Exempt Purposes All activities were consistent with our mission statement, including the administration activities of the organization. The Habitat Trust for Wildlife accomplished our goal of "Giving Nature Sanctuary" in the public trust of eon, serving imperiled habitats of rare, threatened and endangered species within the United States of Kmerica. Therefore, the organization contributed towards providing a better natural environment in conserving biodiversity - a benefit to the public. Part IX Information Regarding Taxable Subsidiaries and Disregarded Entities The Habitat Trust does not have any subsidiaries and/or taxable subsidiaries. Neither does the organization have any entities and./or disregarded entities. The Habitat Trust for Wildlife Tax ID# 04-3637770 Mailing: 439 Westwood SC #144, Fayettevllle, NC 28314 Southwest USA: 30 North Raymond Avenue, Suite 303, Pasadena, CA 91103 Southeast USA: Ecology Center, 106 Rocklngham Street, Carthage, NC 28327 Phone: (626) 676-4116 and (910) 947-5091 Www.TheHabltatTrust.oro ATTACHMENT to FORM 990, 2003 Return of Organization Exempt From Income Tax Profit & Loss Statement 2003: Jan.l, 2003 - Dec. 31, 2003 INCOME ($143,052.51) Direct public Support 142,434.26 Indirect public Support 518.25 Govt contributions (grants) 0 Public service revenue including govt fees and contracts 0 Membership dues and assessments 0 Interest on savings and temporary cash investments 0 Dividends and interest fi.om securities 0 Gross rents 0 Net rental income 0 Other investment income 0 Gross amount fi'om sales of assets other than inventory 0 Special events and activities (net income) 0 Other revenue 0 EXPENSES ($137,743.83) Program services ,~ 97,363.85 Management and general 39,993.88 Fundraising 0 Payments to affiliates 376.10 ATTACHMENT to FORM 990, 2003 (continued) Return of Organization Exempt From Income Tax Profit & Loss Statement 2003: Jan.1, 2003 - Dec. 31, 2003 CATAGORIES Income ($143,052.51) Bank credits Individual donors 7,278.51 CLeeona Klippstein 1878.51, Ben Anderson 5,000.00, Mary Tkaeh 400.) Loans Organization grants Refund-Reimbursement ' · Awards (legal etc) 133,654.09 (A&J Resources, Inc., Lytle Companies via Spirit of the Sage Council and legal counsel, Craig Sherman) Expenses ($137,743.83) Bank charge 2,945.57 Conference-Meetings 262.00 Consultant fees (71,646.88) Executive Director/Conservation 34,660.00 Legal 31,653.00 Project Asst./s 2,300.00 Medical/Dental benefits 2,033.88 Tax Accountant 500.00 Donation-Tithe 376.10 Education 0 Equipment and Maintenance 0 Insurance & Taxes (travel, property, event) 4004.70 Communications (8,857.95) Cable/DSL 791.10 Inteme~/email/hosting 1424.85 Telephone/s 7,642.00 Fax 0 Project materials (15,375.98) Office supplies/Research and documentation Postage 3,555.57 Printing/Copying/Publications 7,901.90 Occupancy/Rent and Utilities 19,385.75 Travel 3,421.43 Quigley & Miron Certified Public ~,ccountants Suite 1660 Suite 317 3550 Wilshire Boulevard 528 Arizona Avenue Los Angeles. California 90010 Santa Monica. California 90401 Telephone: (213) 639-3550 Telephone: (310) 394-6687 Facsimile: (213) 639-3555 Facsimile: (310) 394-6027 INDEPEI~DENT AUDITOR ' S REPORT Board of Directors Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs Los Angeles, California We have audited the accompanying statement of financial position of Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs (SEE), a nonprofit corporation, as of December 31, 2002, and the related statements of activities and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of SEE's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluatin~ the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs as of December 31, 2002, and the changes in its net assets and its cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Los Angeles, California September 5, 2003 SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL E~TREPRENEURS STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION December 31, 2002 ASSETS CURRENT ASSETS Cash and cash equivalents $ 1,021,341 TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS 1,021,341 EQUIPMENT, NET Equipment 6,100 Less accumulated depreciation (2,033 ) TOTAL N~T EQUIPMENT 4,067 INVESTMENTS 6,399 INVESTMENT IN UNDEVELOPED LAND 52. 188 TOTAL ASSETS $ 1,083,995 LIABILITIES AND NET ASSETS CURRENT LIABILITIES Accounts payable and accrued expenses 56. 069 TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES 56,069 NET ASSETS Unrestricted 30,038 Temporarily restricted 997,888 TOTAL NET ASSETS 1,027,926 TOTAL LIABILITIES A/qD NET ASSETS $ 1. 083,995 See notes to financial statements. 2 SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL E~T~EPRENEURS STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES Year Ended December 31, 2002 Temporarily Unrestricted Restricted Total SUPPORT AND REVENUE Contributions $ 5,100 $ 3,319,808 $ 3,324,908 Fiscal fees 176,855 176,855 Interest income 3,500 6.405 9,905 TOTAL SUPPORT AND REVE/qUE 185,455 3,326,213 3,511,668 NET ASSETS RELEASED FROM RESTRICTIONS 3.388.542 (3.388,542) TOTAL SUPPORT, REVENUE AND NET ASSETS RELEASED FROM RESTRICTIONS 3,573,997 (62,329) 3,511,668 EXPENSES Program services 3,429,604 3,429,604 Management and general 157.573 157.573 TOTAL EXPENSES 7,587,177 3,587,177 CHANGE IN NET ASSETS (13,180) (62,329) (75,509) NET ASSETS AT BEGINNING OF YEAR 43,218 1,060,217 1,103,435 NET ASSETS AT ElqD OF YEAR $ 30,038 $ 997,888 $ 1,027,926 See notes to financial statements. 3 SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS STATEMENT OF FUNCTIONAL EXPENSES Year Ended December 31, 2002 Management Program and Services General Total EXPENSES Salaries, wages, payroll taxes, and employee benefits $ $ 104,826 $ 104,826 Bank fees 21,029 231 21,260 Conferences and meetings 28,214 28,214 Consulting fees 657,199 21,519 678,718 Depreciation 2,033 2,033 Direct support 375,580 375,580 Education 75,022 75,022 Equipment 185,962 1,493 187,455 Fiscal fees 176,855 176,855 Insurance 6,552 1,985 8,537 Internet and website 24,257 1,340 25 597 Legal fees 46,313 46 313 Maintenance and repairs 163,270 160 163 430 Materials 587,590 587 590 Miscellaneous 8,686 5,088 13 774 Outreach efforts 425,247 3,607 428 854 Occupancy 183,670 183 670 Postage and shipping 27,139 5,479 32 618 Printing and publications 138,912 1,661 140 573 Research and documentation 19,806 19 806 Supplies 15,698 4,758 20 456 Taxes and licenses 2,730 2,730 Telephone 53,340 5,426 58,766 Travel and meals 204,500 204.500 TOTALS $3,429,604 $ 157,573 $3,587,177 See notes to financial statements. 4 SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS Year Ended December 31, 2002 OPERATING ACTIVITIES Change in net assets $ (75,509) Adjustments to reconcile change in net assets to net cash used in operating activities: Depreciation 2,033 Changes in operating assets and liabilities: Accounts payable and .. accrued expenses 47.569 NET CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES (25,907) INVESTING ACTIVITIES Purchase of investments (6.399) NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES (6,399) NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALElgTS (32,306) CASH AND CASH EQUIVALE/gTS AT BEGINlgING OF ~ . . . 1,053,647 CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF YEAR $ 1.021.341 SUPPLEMENTARY DISCLOSURES Income taxes paid $ Interest paid $ See notes to financial statements. 5 SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL E~TKEPRENEURS NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2002 NOTE i--SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Nature of Activities--Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs (SEE) was initiated in 1994 as a non-profit administrative structure for grassroots projects. In addition to providing necessary administrative services at a low cost, this structure is a model of activist empowerment and mutual support. As of December 31, 2002, SEE has grown to encompass approximately 200 projects, from one-person, start-up volunteer efforts to full-scale, long-term operations. Basis of Accounting--The accounts of SEE are maintained, and the financial statements are prepared, on the accrual basis of accounting. Accordingly, revenues are recognized when earned, and expenses are recognized when incurred. Contributions--Non-reciprocal contributions received are recorded as u~_restricted, temporarily restricted or permanently restricted support depending on the existence and/or nature of any donor restrictions. Use of Estimates--The financial statements include estimates and assumptions made by management that affect the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Cash and Cash Equivalents--For purposes of the statement of cash flows, SEE considers all unrestricted highly liquid investments with an initial maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Investments--Investments are valued at fair market value. Property and Equipment--Property, furniture, and equipment are stated at cost. Acquisitions in excess of $3,000 are capitalized. Property, furniture, and equipment are depreciated on the straight-line method using useful lives ranging from 5 to 31.5 years. Income Taxes--SEE is a nonprofit health and human services organization exempt from federal income ta~es under Section 501(c) (3) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) and from California franchise tax under Section 23701(d) of the California Revenue and Taxation Code. Accordingly, no provision for federal or state income taxes is included in the financial statements. In addition, SEE has been determined by the Internal Revenue Service not to be a private foundation within the meaning of Section 509(a) of the Code. Concentrations .,9f Credit Risk--Financial instruments which potentially subject SEE to concentrations of credit risk consist of cash and cash equivalents. SEE places its cash with a high credit quality financial institution where the funds are guaranteed by the Federal Deposit ' Insurance Corporation (FDIC) up to $100,000 per institution. Such cash balances exceeded the FDIC insurance limits by approximately $950,000 as of December 31, 2002. 6 .2- 7 SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTKEPRENEI/RS NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--Continued NOTE 2--INVESTMENTS Investments at December 31, 2002, consist of 75 shares of common stock between two publicly held companies. NOTE 3--INVESTMENT IN UNDEVELOPED LAND In April, 2000, SEE received commercial property o~ behalf of a project valued at $52,188. As a consequence of a p~ovision in the transfer grant deed, use of the property is irrevocably restricted for open-space purposes. NOTE 4--TEMPORARILY RESTRICTED NET ASSETS Donor restricted contributions and grants are reported as increases in temporarily restricted support when such gifts are received with donor stipulations that limit the use of the donated assets. Since the contributions and grants relate to the various projects of SEE, essentially all contributions and grants are temporarily restricted. When a donor restriction expires, essentially as the monies are spent, temporarily restricted net assets are reclassified to unrestricted net assets and reported as released from restrictions. NOTE 5--COMMITMENTS SEE leases its administrative office facilities in Los Angeles under a noncancellable operating lease that commenced on April 1, 2003 and expires on March 31, 2006. Upon expiration of this lease, SEE has the option to extend the lease for an additional two year period at a negotiated rate of $1,500 per month. Future minimum annual payments under this lease agreement are as follows: Year Ending December 31. 2003 $ 9,000 2004 13,800 2005 17,100 2006 4,500 TOTAL $ 44,400 No rental expense was incurred for the year ended December 31, 2002. NOTE 6--RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS Prior to April 1, 2003, SEE's administrative office facilities were donated by a member of the Board of the Directors. In early 2003 SEE negotiated a three-year lease agreement for office space and relocated to its new facilities in April 2003 (see Note 5). 7 I YEAR California Exempt Organization FORM 2002 Annual Information Return 199 MONTH DAY YEAR MONTH CAY YEA.R F~)rcale~dar0r, fi~calyea[begi~ning JAA~3ARY I ! I 2002 , andending DECEMBER I 31 I 2002. I' : :' ';~ ~ ,: IMPOR'rANT:¥0u~htJmber is required.: ~ ~, , : A Final return? ~ Yes. Check appliCable box. [~ No Calil<m?llaC°rlB°~aU°r~nurnbef Federalempl°yecidentificati°nnumber · ~Dissolved ~-]Withdrawn F~](aUachexplanallon) C2179086 95-4116679 I' a box is chc~ed, entre' date · Attach Preaddressed Label B CheC~ ,~-,~, fi,~d ,hi, y,~: Stat,,: ~ ,Og ~] 100 or See Instructions C,~oratio~/O~ganizati .... Federa':®990[~990EzE]990T E]990PF E]1041 E~'12OH E]1120 SOCIAL & ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS chmity, religlousorganlzation,~iscontroeedbyareligiousop~'alion. Addres~ A~T no. PMB no. c~eck b~Li See General Instruction F. No filing fee is required. · 11948 WEST WASHINGTON 201 D'.~i..~'o.."'"..?s~,,.-"~"n~'~.~n~. ...... BOULEVARD E ^cc~,,u-u;,.,,tho~ ~.~.,,~ CAS H LOS ANGELES, CA 90066 i ~ Part I Complete Part I unless not required to file this form. See General Instructions B and C. 1 Gross sales or receipts from other sources. From Gide 2, Part Il, line 8 ..... i ............... · 1 186,760, Receipts 2 Gross duesand assessments from membersand affiliates · 2 and 3 Gross contributions, gifts, grants, and similar amounts received. See instructions ' S?MT., 1.. · 3 3 ~ 3 2 4,9 0 8 , Revenues 4 Total gross receipts for flliug requirement test. Add line 1 through line 3 This line must be completed. If the result is less than $25,000, see General Instruciion C .................... · 4 3 (Attach check 5 Cost of goods sold ............................................................ 5 ' 7 Total cosls. Add line 5 and line 6 i 7 8 Total gross income. Subtract line 7 from line 4 ....................................... ! 8 3 f 511 ,. 668 9 Total expenses and disbursements. From Side 2, Part II, line 18 : ............................. 9 3 ~ 5 3 9., 6 0 8 Expenses 10 Excess of receipts over expenses and disbursements. Subtract line 9 from line 8 .............. 10 - 2 '7; 9 4 0 11 Filing fee $10 or $25. See General instruction F 11 1 0 Filing 12 Penalb/for failure fo file on time. See General Instruction L ......... ! 12 13 Balance due. Add line t 1 and line 12 ......................................................... e 13 10 I4 If exempt under R&TC Section 23701 d, has the organization during the year: (t) participated in any pblitical campaign or (2) attempted to influence legislation or any ballot measure, or (3) made an election under R&TC Section 23704.5 (relating lo lobbying by public charitieS)? If'Yes,' complete and a'dach form FTC 3509, Political or Legislative Activities by Section 23701 d Organizations ............. E~ Yes [~ NO 15 Did the organization have any changes in its activities, governing instrument, articles of incorporationl or bylaws that have not been reported to the Franchise Tax Board? If'Yes' complete an explanation and attach copies of !evised documents E~ '"es E~No 16 Is the organization exempt under R&TC Section 23701g? i ............................................. [~] Y.~ [~ No If"Yes,' enter amount of gross receipts from nonmember sources $ 17 Did the organization file Form 100, Form 100S, 100W, or Form 109 to report taxable income? E~ Yes F~ Nc, If"Yes,' entsr amount of total income reported $ 18 The gnancial records are in care ol SOCTAL & ENVTRONME~TA'r, E~TRE]J::'~EN Daytime telephone ( 3 1 0 ) '7 3 '7 - 9 1 4 8 Iocatsdat 11948 W. WASH'rNGTO~ BLV"D~ if 201~ LOS AN'GE'r.ES~ CA 90066 Paid Firm's ?~ QUIg P,eparer's i,~.~r- EY & MIRON, CPA S .~u 95-4656881 Use 0nly~.~""'°~'"N'~,..~--.--35'50 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD--SUITE 1660 "1 '"'~'h°""l O~im. LOS ANGELES, CA 90010-2481 (213) 639-3550 For Privacy Ant Notice, gut form FTB 1131. ~ 19902104022 ~ Form 199 C12002 Side1 SOCIAL & ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS 95-4116679 Part II Organizstions with gross receipts of more then $25,000 and private foundations regardless of amount of gross receipts - complete Part ii or furnish substitute information. See Specific Line Instructions. 1 Gross sales or receipts from all business activities. See instructions 1 2 Interest 2 9,905, 3 Dividends 3 Receipts 4 Gross rents 4 from Other 5 Gross royalties 5 Sources 6 Gross amoun rece ved from sale of assets 6 7 0therincome. SEE STATEMENT 2 7 176,855. 8 Total gross sales or receipts from other sources. Add line 1 through line 7. Enter here and on Side 1, Part I, line 1 8 186,760. 9 Contributions, gifts, grants, and similar amounts paid. i 9 10 Dsbursements oorfo members 10 11 Compensation of officers, directors, and trustees .................... SE~ :..~?.~?E~TT" .3 .... 11 0. Expenses 12 O_ther salaries and wages i .................... 12 89,582. and 13 Interest 13 Disburse- 14 Taxes ................................ 14 8,181 ments 15 Rents ! 15 183, 670. 16 Depreciatiofl and depletion I 16 2,033 17 Other SE.E _f.'~i~TE~ENT. 4 ... 17 3,256,142. 18 Total expenses and disbursements. Add line 9 through line 17. Enter here and on Side 1, Part I, line 9 ..... 18 3,5 3 9,6 0 8. Schedule L Balance Sheets Beginning of taxable year I End of taxable year Assets (a) (b) I (c) (d) $ Investments in other bonds. : ~- i ' . 7 Investments in stock. STNT 5 * '~ ~,; ' ~ ~' ' ' ': 6,399 8 Mortgage loans (number of loans ) ": * '~ '~" ~ [ 10 a Oepreciableassets 6,100. ' ~' · :7' ~ : ,=:l!; ~ 6,100. b Less accumulated depreciation . 6,100 2,0 3 3. 11 Land ...... '' ' 52,188 *~ , 52,188. 13 Totalassets ':~" ' 1,083,995. :'1 Retainedearningsorincometund ~ - ........ ', lr 111~ 9315. ' ' '~ 1 083 995 22 Total liabilities and net worth .................... : ~. 1,111,93;5. ' ;: ;" Schedule M-1 Reconci{iation of income per books with income per return Do not complete this schedule if the amount on Schedule L, line 13, column (d), is less than $25,000 t Netincomeperbooks ........ -'75 , 509 . 3 Excessofcapitallossesovercapitalgains not included in this return. . ............ year. . .................. 8 Oeductionsin this return not charged deducted in this return. S~'~ ..~ 4 '7,5 6 ~ 9 Total. Add line 7 and line 8 ......... 6 Total. ~ .~. ' .: !* 10 Net insome per return. Add line 1 through line 5 ........................ - 2 '7 ~ 9 z~ 0 Subtract line 9 from line 6 - 2 '7,9 ~ 0, ~9~/~2-~3~2 Side2 Form 199Cl 2002 ] 19902204022 SOCIAL & ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS 95-4116679 FORM 199 CASH CONTRIBUTIONS OF $5000 OR MORE STATEMENT 1 INCLUDED ON PART I, LINE 3 DATE OF CONTRIBUTOR'S NAME CONTRIBUTOR'S ADDRESS GIFT AMOUNT ADELAIDE P. GOMER 422 CAYUGA HEIGHTS RD ITHACA, NY 14850 5,000. ALFRED & HARRIET FEINMAN 134 LINCOLN AVE PURCHASE, NY FOUNDATION 10577-2311 5,000. ANN & GORDON GETTY 1 EMBARCADERO CENTER, S~ITE FOUNDATION 1050 SAM FRANCISCO, CA 941il-3642 12,000. ARCA FOUNDATION 115~ CONNECTICUT AVE NW, SUITE 400~WASHINGTON, DC 20036 15,000. AUSTIN COMMUNITY PO ~OX 5159 AUSTIN, TX 78763 FOUNDATION 8,000. BERKELEY PATIENTS 2747 SAN PABLO AVE BERKELEY, GROUP,INC. CA 74702 6,250. CALIFORNIA CERTIFIED 23 CORRAL RD BELL CANYON, CA FARMERS MAREKT 91397 13,615. CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY 4451S FIGUEROA ST, SUITE 3400 FOUNDATION LOSiANGELES, CA 90071 71,567. CALIFORNIA FEDERAL BANK 8401STILLWATER RD WEST SAC~%MENTO, CA 95605-1649 5,000. CAROL SNYDER HALBERSTADT 9 WHITTEMORE RD NEWTON, MA 024~8-2105 5,880. CAROLE & ROBERT DALY 9460 WILSHIRE BLVD, SUITE 600 CHARITABLE FOUNDATION BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212 25,000. CENTER FOR PUBLIC 29 TEMPLE PL BOSTON, MA 02111 INTEREST RESEARCH, INC. i 6,500. CHARTWELL CHARITABLE 1999 AVENUE OF THE STARS, FOUNDATION SUITE 3050 LOS ANGELES, CA 90067 50,000. CLAIRE B. WILLIS 183!BABCOCK ST, SUITE 1 BROOKLINE, MA 02446-3171 5,000. CRA INVESTMENT 16900 GOLDEN WEST ST HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 5,000. STATEMENT(S) 1 SOCIAL & ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS 95-4116679 DANIEL GOLDBERG 9100 WILSHIRE BLVD, SUITE 1000 WEST BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212-3413 5,000. DAVID FAMILY FOUNDATION, 10960 WILSHIRE BLVD, SUITE INC. 2150 LOS ANGELES, CA 90024 10,000. DAVID HEARTLIFE 16 SHELTER COVE PACIFICA, CA 94044 5,000. EARTH ISLAND PO BOX 9400 CANOGA PARK! CA 91309-0400 i 5,200. EARTH LINKS, INC. 519 SEABRIGHT AVE, SUITE 103 SANTA CRUZ, CA 95062-3482 6,375. ELAINE SEILER 3 BARNABAS RD MARION, MA 02738-1421 ~ 10,000. ENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY 11132 VENTURA BLVD, suITE 401 FOUNDATION STUDIO CITY, CA 91604-3156 10,000. FIDELITY INVESTMENTS 82 DEVONSHIRE ST BOSTON MA CHARITABLE GIFT FUND 02109 35,500. FOUNDATION FOR PO BOX 149 LAGUNA BEACH CA SUSTAINABILITYAND 92652 INNOVATION 5,000. GARY N. CRAMER 17406 STONEY MEADOWS VANCOUVER, WA 98682 i 5,000. GIFF-SOM BACK FOUNDATION 810 7TH AVE NEW YORK, NY 10019 18,000. GRANT L. NEMIROW 2550 N. HOLLYWOOD WY, S~ITE 600 BURBANK, CA 91505 i 7,500. HAMILL FAMILY FOUNDATION 10 S, WACKER DR, SUITE ~150 CHICAGO, IL 60606 i 17,000. HORN FOUNDATION 335 N. MAPLE DR, SUITE 135 BEVERLY HILLS, CA 9021043879 42,500. I.L.T./INCOME BUILDERS 200 LIME QUARRY RD MADISON, AL INTERNATIONAL 35758 9,000. JAMES W. & CHARLOTTE L. 1787 KING RD VISTA, CA 92084 WHEELER 22,500. JEWISH COMMUNAL FUND 130 E. 59TH ST, SUITE 1204 NEW YORK, NY 10022 15,000. JOHN GILMORE PO BOX 170608 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94117 20,000. STATEMENT(S) 1 SOCIAL & ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS 95-4116679 JOSEPH K. & INEZ 190 N. CANON DR, SUITE 404 EICHENBAUM BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210-5323 50,000. KENNETH S. ALPERN 3222 MILITARY AVE LOS ANGELES, CA 90034 5,300. KOHLBERG FOUNDATION 111 RADIO CIRCLE MOUNT KISCO, NY 10549 40,000. KRISTINA KIEHL & ROBERT 2275 SUMMIT DR HILLSBOROUGH, ~ 5,000. E. FRIEDMAN CA 94010 LEAR FAMILY FOUNDATION 100 N. CRESCENT DR, FLOOR 2 BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210! 10,000. LEONARDO DICAPRIO PO BOX 291958 LOS ANGEL~S, CA FOUNDATION 90029 LEVITT DEVELOPMENT PO BOX 207 MOUNT ARLINGTON, NJ COMPANY 07856 8,000. M. CAROLYN JUDD 8955 INDIAN SPRINGS RD FREDERICK, MI) 21702 12,000. MARION R. WEBER 30 ROCKEFELLER PLAZA NEWI YORK, NY 10012 ~ 10,000. MARYLOU MORELOCK 1187 AZTEC TOPANGA, CA 910290 8,400. MILO & ABBY DEVRIES 1935 GULF OF MEXICO, UNIT 301 i 5,000. FOUNDATION LONGBOAT, FL 34228 NATIONAL CITY BANK 1900 E. 9TH ST CLEVELANDI, OH 44114 i 35,000. NATIONAL FISH AND 1120 CONNECTICUT AVE NW,! SUITE WILDLIFE FOUNDATION 900 WASHINGTON, DC 200361 5,000. NATIONAL FOREST 4800 HAMPDEN LN, FLOOR 9 FOUNDATION BETHESDA, MD 20814 ! 13,890. NATURGANIC FOI/N'DATION 5300 SANTA MONICA BLVD LbS ANGELES, CA 90029 ! 35,000. NICOLE HILLEBRANDT 930 N. PALM AVE, SUITE 1~5 WEST HOLLYWOOD, CA 90069! 10,000. OWEN DAVIS 169 27TH ST SAN FRANCISCO, CA ,; 94110-4312 6,000. PATAGONIA, INC. PO BOX 150 VENTURA, CA 93002-0150 250,100. SOCIAL & ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS 95-4116679 ~ATTY SHENKER 971 ENCHANTED WY PACIFIC. PALISADES, CA 90272-2824~ 5 000 PAUL NEWMAN-NEWMAN'S OWN 523 DANBURY RD WILTON, CT FUND 06897 10 000 PETER WAGNER AND 2850 S. MOJAVE RD, LOT B LAS TONYE-MARIE CASTENADA VEGAS, NV 89121 5 000 POND FOLTNDATION 1447 SEVILLE RD SANTE FE!, NM 87505 I 18 900 RALLY TO SAVE AHMANSON 1534 N. MOORPARK RD, UNIT 306 RANCH THOUSAND OAKS, CA 91360' 16 096 RONALD MEYER 11400 W. OLYMPIC BLVD, sUITE 550 LOS ANGELES, CA 90064 10 000 SNAPPLE 709 WESTCHESTER AVE WHITE PLAINS, NY 10604 i 9 000 STEINBERG FAMILY FUND, 5901 N. SNOWFLAKE DR INC. FLAGSTAFF, AZ 86004 5,000 SUSAN BLOOM PO BOX 525 SALT SPRING ISLAND, BC V8K 2W2 CANADA : 5,000 TIDES FOUNDATION PO BOX 29903 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94129-0903 .169,324. VANGUARD PUBLIC 383 RHODE ISLkND ST, SUITE 301 FOUNDATION SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94103 5,000· WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK 350 S. GRAND AVE, FLOOR 34 LOS ANGELES, CA 90071 ! 5,000. WEAKEST LINK PRODUCTIONS, 3000 W. ALAMEDA AVE, SUITE 9, INC. ROOM 2738 BURBANK, CA 91523 28,750. WENDY & OZZIE SILNA 23301 PALM CANYON LN MALIBU, CA 90265 10,000. I 47,500. ANONYMOUS ANTHONY CRABB & BARBARA 129 FERRERO DR HERALDSBU~G, CA GRASSESCHI FOUNDATION 95448 i 10,000. CANADIANS IN SUPPORT OF 151 REBECCA ST, SUITE 227 AFGHAN WOMEN OAKVILLE, ON, L6L 5G8 CANADA 7,319. ANONYMOUS 20,244. COMMON CENTS NEW YORK 104 W. 88TH ST NEW YORK, NY 10024 17,050· STATEMENT(S) 1 SOCIAL & ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS 95-4116679 FORD MOTOR COMPANY PO BOX 1758 DEARBON, MI~48121 10,000. JILL SMUDSKI & ROBERT 11509 PATRIOT LN POTOMAC, MD RUBINOFF 20854 5,000. JOHNSON FAMILY FOUNDATION 4601 RUE BELLE MER SANIBEL, FL 33957 5,000. THE BANKY LA ROCQUE 5332 HARBOR ST CITY OF FOUNDATION COMMERCE, CA 90040 10,000. THE BODY SHOP FOUNDATION WATERSMEAD, LITTLEHAMPTQN WEST SUSSEX, BN17 6LS UNITEDi KINGDOM i 8,587. THE GUACAMOLE FUND 440 B PIER AVE HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 8,063. THE WOMEN'S FOUNDATION 340 PINE ST, SUITE 302 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104 94,500. THOMAS P. & ANCELLA PO BOX 1204 ROSS, CA 94957 TOLDRIAN 25,000. TOTAL INCLUDED ON LINE 3 1,574,120. FORM 199 OTHER INCOME STATEMENT 2 DESCRIPTION AMOUNT FISCAL FEES 176,855. TOTAL TO FORM 199, PART II, LINE 7 176,855. STATEMENT(S ) 1 2 SOCIAL & ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS 95-4116679 FORM 199 COMPENSATION OF OFFICERS, DIRECTORS AND TRUSTEES STATEMENT 3 TITLE AND NAME AND ADDRESS AVERAGE HRS WORKED/WK COMPENSATION ANDREW BEATH PRESIDENT 0. 11948 W. WASHINGTON BLVD, SUITE 201 1 LOS ANGELES, CA 90066 MAX GAIL SECRETARY 0. 11948 W. WASHINGTON BLVD, SUITE 201 1 LOS ANGELES, CA 90066 NIMA DILMAGHANI TREASURER 0. 11948 W. WASHINGTON BLVD, SUITE 201 1 LOS ANGELES, CA 90066 [ ATOSSA SOLTANI I DIRECTOR 0. 11948 W. WASHINGTON BLVD, SUITE 201 1 LOS ANGELES, CA 90066 TOTAL TO FORM 199, PART II, LINE 11 0. FORM 199 OTHER EXPENSES STATEMENT 4 DESCRIPTION AMOUNT BANK FEES 21 260. CONSULTING FEES 673 542. EDUCATION 75 022 SMALL EQUIPMENT 180 615 FISCAL FEES 176 855 INSURANCE 8 537 DIRECT SUPPORT 375 580 INTERNET AND WEBSITE 25 597 REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE 163 430 PROGP~AM MATERIALS 556 422 MISCELLANEOUS 14 809 OUTREACH EFFORTS 428 854. RESEARCH AND DOCUMENTATION 19,806. OTHER EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 7,063. LEGAL FEES 54,813. SUPPLIES 19,016. TELEPHONE 58,766. POSTAGE AND SHIPPING 22,868. PRINTING AND PUBLICATIONS 140,573. TRAVEL 204,500. CONFERENCES,CONVENTIONS AND MEETINGS 28,214. TOTAL TO FORM 199, PART II, LINE 17 3,256,142. STATEMENT(S) 3, 4 ,SOCIAL & ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS 95-4116679 FORM 199 INVESTMENTS IN STOCK STATEMENT 5 DESCRIPTION BEG. OF YEAR END OF YEAR 74 SHARES OF PROCTOR & GAMBLE CO. 0. 6,359. 1 SHARE OF J.M. SMUCKER CO. 0. 40. TOTAL TO FORM 199, SCHEDULE L, LINE 7 0. 6,399. FORM 199 EXPENSES RECORDED ON BOOKS THIS YEAR STATEMENT 6 NOT DEDUCTED IN THIS RETURN DESCRIPTION AMOUNT NET ADJUSTMENT OF ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 47,569. TOTAL TO FORM 199, SCHEDULE M-l, LINE 5 47,569. FORM 199 FUND BALANCES STATEMENT 7 DESCRIPTION BEG. OF YEAR END OF YEAR UNRESTRICTED ASSETS 43,218. 30,038. TEMPORARILY RESTRICTED ASSETS 1,068,717. 1,053,957. TOTAL TO FORM 199, SCHEDULE L, LINE 21 1,111,935. 1,083,995. STATEMENT(S) 5, 6, 7 ' ' TA~/~SLE YEAR CALIFORNIA~0RM 1 ' 2002 Corporation Depreciation and Amortization 3885 Attach to Form 100 or Form 100W. F O~_,'~ 199 FEIN 95-4116679 Corporation name California corporation number SOCIAL & ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS C2179086 Part I Depreciation (b} (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) [a) Description of property Date acquired Cost or Depreciation allowed or ~ethod of Lite or Depreciation Additiona~ other basis allowable in earlier years fl~ring rate for this year first year f 1 EQUI PI~ NT ;ARIOUS 6,100. SIJ 3.00 2,033 2 Add the amounts in column (g) and column (h). The combined total of column (h) may not exceed $2,000. See instructions for line 1, column (h) 2 2, 0 3 3. 3 Total. Add the amounts on line 2, column (g) and column (h) 3 2,033. 4 Total depreciation claimed for federal purposes from federal Form 4562, line 22 4 2,033. 5 Depreciation adjustment. If Pine 4 is greater than line 3, enter the difference here and on Form 100 or Form 100W, Side 1, line 6. If line 4 is less than line 3, enter the difference here and on Form 100 or Form 100W, Side 1, Pine 12. (If Caliturn!a depreciation ~ amounts a. re used. to de. termine net income before state adjustments on Form 100 or Form 100W no ad ustmeht is necessary. 5 Part II Amortization (a) Description (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) of property Date acquired Cost or Amortization allo~ed or R&TC Period or Amortizalion other basis allowable in earlie~ years section percentage for this year 1 2 Total. Add the amounts in column (g) ................................................................ 2 3 Total amortization claimed for federal purposes from federal Form 4562, line 44 3 4 Amortization adjustment. If line 3 is greater than line 2. enter the difference here and on Form 100 or Form 100W, Side 1, line 6. If line 3 is less than line 2, enter the difference here and on Form 100 or Form 100W, Side 1, line 12 4 388502104022 [ FTB 3885 2002 The Habitat Trust for Wildlife Nature Sanctuaries Management Plan Cucamong(n)a, North Etiwanda, West Valley Foothills Area 2003 - 2004 Developed by The Habitat Trust in Consideration of, and adapted from, the North Etiwanda Habitat Preserve Management Plan, 2001 USFWS, CDFG, San Bemardino County Open Space District 1. 1. INTRODUCTION The purpose of the Nature Sanctuaries Management Plan is to provide guidance to the Board of Directors, Officers and Consultants of The Habitat Trust in protecting, conserving and appropriately managing habitat for flora and fauna in perpetuity. A series of Nature Sanctuaries have been created through receivership of habitat mitigation parcels associated with approved residential development by the City of Rancho Cucamonga and County of San Bernardino. Such development approvals were legally challenged by a nonprofit conservation organization, Spirit of the Sage Council, and as a result the habitat mitigation lands were directed to The Habitat Trust to own in deed and fee title. 1.1 Importance of North Etiwanda as a Regional Resource The alluvial fan located in the North Etiwanda area near Rancho Cucumonga is considered by the California Department offish and Game (CDFG) and US Fish and Wildlife Service CLISFWS) to be an important ecological area. The Preserve is wholly located within a State- designated Significant Natural Area (Fish and Game Code Section 1930 et. seq.). The property's value as an important ecological and cultural resource is attributed to the following: Presence of alluvial scrub, ranked by the State, Natural Diversity Data Base CNDDB) as a very threatened and rare natural community that is globally imperiled; · Presence of other rare and threatened habitats such as sycamore alluvial woodland, white alder riparian forest, California walnut woodland, fresh water springs, blue-line streams and canyon alluvial washes; · Presence of approximately 46 sensitive species of wildlife and plants occur within the Nature Sanctuaries and in locally contiguous habitats, including State- and federally-listed endangered, threatened, and/or sensitive species such as Plummer's mariposa lily, Parry's spine flower, Bell's sage sparrow, rufous- crowned sparrow, San Diego homed lizard, Los Angeles pocket mouse, California gnatcatcher, least Bell's vireo, and San Bemardino Merdam's kangaroo rat; · The Nature Sanctuaries and the surrounding area of the indigenous Cucamong(n)a area is known to be a sacred site by the Gabrielino- Shoshone Nation aka the Gabrielino Band of California Mission Indians, by State legislation, and is currently used for cultural purposes; · Much of the northem boundary is contiguous with the San Bemardino National Forest and the surrounding landscape is currently mostly undeveloped. 1.2 Purpose of the Management Plan The general purpose of this Management Plan is to provide a conceptual framework for the overall long-term conservation and management of the Nature Sanctuaries. The primary goal of this Management Plan is to guide conservation and management of existing on-site habitats, including waters, by providing direction toward the development of annual work plans by the Board of Directors. In support of this overarching goal, this plan will: Identify the habitats to be protected, conserved and managed under this plan; · Identify general management goals, objectives and actions to protect sensitive habitats within the Preserve from existing and future impacts; · Identify a hierarchy of management actions associated with management objectives; and Outline a management process for the Board of Directors whose direction is to implement the objectives of the Management Plan 2. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION For a more detailed description of the area of the Nature Sanctaries, see Safford and Quinn's 1998 Conservation Plan for the Etiwanda-Day Canyon Drainage System Supporting the Rare Natural Community of Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub. 2.1 Location The Nature Sanctuaries are located on a large alluvial fan at the southern end of the San Gabriel Mountains and north of the City of Rancho Cucumonga at the northerly terminus of Etiwanda Avenue. The Nature Sanctuaries are generally bounded between Cucamonga Canyon and the Cajon Pass - adjacent on the west is the County's North Etiwanda Habitat Preserve; on the north by the San Bemardino National Forest; on the east by Henderson Creek; and on the south by a Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (LADWP) transmission easement and privately owned parcels. In addition, some of the parcels are "in-holdings" located within the Congressionally-designated boundary of the San Bemardino National Forest. 2.2 Site Description The northernmost portion of the Nature Sanctuaries encompasses the mouths of East Etiwanda and Henderson canyons at an elevation of approximately 2,900 feet above sea level, and slopes to the south and southeast at an average 10% slope to approximately 2,100 feet elevation at the southern property line. The Nature Sanctuaries are bordered on the west by Etiwanda Creek that flows from East Etiwanda Canyon and the County's North Etiwanda Habitat Preserve/Open Space District 1. The Nature Sanctuaries are on a geomorphologically complex alluvial fan, bordered on the north by the San Gabriel Mountains, and transitioning southward into the San Bemardino Valley. The hydrology of East Etiwanda Creek remains relatively intact, but is threatened by a future County Flood Control Project. In addition to East Etiwanda and Henderson Creeks, the Nature Sanctuaries are traversed by Middle Canyon Wash that crosses the central portion. A system of faults that cross the Nature Sanctuaries has created scarps and a fresh water spring. The Nature Sanctuaries are covered with a number of plant communities associated with alluvial fans and washes, including alluvial scrub, coastal sage scrub, alluvial chaparral, walnut woodland, sycamore woodland, and riparian vegetation. On the mountain slopes, chaparral and sage scrub elemeuts occur. (See Section 3.1, Natural Communities.) 2.3 Existing Uses The Nature Sanctuaries area is currently used for passive recreation and cultural activities of the indigenous Shoshone-Gabrietino people. Uses which have degraded habitat and wildlife values here include plinking and shooting, trash dumping, off-road vehicle use and water diversion. Structural improvements within the Nature Sanctuaries are limited to the Cucamonga Water Company water transmission system and access road easements. The Cucamonga Water Company has some easements over existing wells, water distribution lines from East Etiwanda Canyon that transverse the western portion of the Nature Sanctuary. The San Bernardino County Flood Control District has drainage easements within East Etiwanda Creek extending into the canyon mouth, abutting a Nature Sanctuary parcel. Unimproved access roads and fire road easements, for US Forest Service and Cucamonga Water Company use, provide the only access within the site. The roads are supposes to remain gated and closed within the boundary of the Nature Sanctuaries. The main access road and gate intersects the LADWP power easement and the County's North Etiwanda Habitat Preserve and leads north up Middle Creek, adjacent and into East Etiwanda Canyon within the National Forest, ending at a waterfall on the Nature Sanctuaries. 3. HABITAT AND SPECIES DESCRIPTIONS The Nature Sanctuaries biological communities and habitats have developed in response to long- term geologic and hydrologic processes. The Etiwanda alluvial fan formed over tens of thousands of years. At the base of the steep San Gabriel Mountains, Day Creek Deer Creek, East Etiwanda Creek and Henderson Creek sweep onto the valley floor. As flood flows emerge from the canyons and slow down, their load of boulders, rocks, cobbles, sand and silt are deposited forming alluvial fans. The Nature Sanctuary is located on a contiguous fan complex formed primarily by Day Creek, and to a lesser extent, Middle, East Etiwanda, Henderson and San Sevaine Creeks. The existing fan consists of areas that continue that to receive hydrologic runoff and intervening upland terrain that may be currently fluvially active. Episodic flooding events scour vegetated channels and deposit fresh debris, which triggers recolonization of plants. This creates a mosaic of different aged stands of vegetation. East Etiwanda Creek remains largely unmodified along the upper fan within the Nature Sanctuaries. However, flood control modifications are planned, including construction of a debris basin about two miles downstream of its debaucher. However, the project has been designed to maintain hydrologic activity in the upper portion of East Etiwanda Creek, thereby maintaining the fluvial activity which rejuvenates alluvial scrub vegetation along the wash. For a more detailed description of geologic and hydrologic processes at the Preserve, see Safford and Quinn's 1998 Conservation Plan for the Etiwanda-Day Canyon Drainage System Supporting the Rare Natural Community of Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub. 3.1 Natural Communities Vegetation at the preserve has developed in response to geologic and hydrologic processes. It has also been influenced by periodic wildfires. The most recent wildfire occurred in 2003. The Nature Sanctuaries possess a high degree of biological diversity and habitat value. This region of Southern California has been identified as a global biodiversity "hot spot" by numerous scientists as published by Conservation International. Approximately 68 percent of the site supports natural plant communities identified as rare by the California Department of Fish and Game. Based on Southwest Environmental, ESA and LSA Associates field surveys, the Nature Sanctuaries contain tree, scrub, and herbaceous-dominated plant communities. Areas such as East Etiwanda Creek and Middle Canyon Wash receive flood flows and therefore tend to support early successional stages of alluvial scrub. Where groundwater persists near the surface, riparian tree species such as the inland White Alder, California Sycamore and California Walnut occur. On the southwest portion of the Nature Sanctuaries fan is an area of alluvial chaparral which contains a blend of chaparral and alluvial elements. This area probably represents the oldest geologic surface on the fan. South facing mountain slopes are largely dominated by chaparral and coastal sage scrub. The Nature Sanctuaries support several unique vegetation features. The alluvial scrub occupying the upland portions of the fan is dominated by white sage. In a study initiated by the CDFG and USFWS, Barbour and Wirka (1997) conducted a floristically based analysis of alluvial scrub in the Southern California region and found that the white sage-dominated group on the Etiwanda 4 ,~ 52 fan was unique and distinct from other sampled stands of alluvial scrub in Los Angeles, San Bemardino, and Riverside Counties. 3.1.1. Tree Dominated Communities There are five tree-dominated natural communities on the site. Figure 1 shows the locations of White Alder Riparian Forest (WARF/OW)3 - __ acres of this natural community are found in Day Canyon at the north side of the property. It is supported by clear, swiftly moving stream. This community is considered rare by CDFG. Interior Live Oak Woodland (OW) - __ acres of interior live oak, canyon oak, and mountain mahogany occur along rocky margins, slopes, and sand bars in Day Canyon and the western bank of Etiwanda Creek. There are few understory species except poison oak. Sycamore Alluvial Woodland (RIP) - Approximately __ acres of this community occur along Etiwanda Creek, the Middle Canyon Wash, along several unnamed stream courses and in a few dry washes. This community is considered rare by CDFG. California Walnut Woodland (WW) - This community is considered rare by CDFG. There are approximately __ acres of walnut woodland Eucalyptus Windrows (E) - Eucalyptus sp., totaling about __ acres, were planted on the north central portion of the alluvial fan during past agricultural periods. While the trees are non-native species, they do supply roosting and nesting habitat for raptors and other birds. TABLE 1 AREA AND STATUS OF NATURAL COMMUNITIES WITHIN NORTH ETIWANDA Size Community (in acres) Statusa White Alder Riparian Forest (WARF) Rare Interior Live Oak Woodland (OW) ND Sycamore Alluvial Woodland (RIP) Rare California Walnut Woodland (WW) Rare Eucalyptus Windrows (E) ND Riversidan Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub (Alluvial Scrub) Rare Chamise Chaparral (CH) ND Ceanothus Chaparral/Riversidian Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub (CC/Alluvial Scrub) or Alluvial Chaparral Rare Freshwater Cienega (Cienega) Rare Non-native Grassland (NNG) ND Disturbed Areas (D) ND TOTAL LSA Associates, Inc. December 1994 survey A CDFG State Designated (Rare) or Not Designated (ND) ~ESA, Inc. North Etiwanda Planned Development Environmental Impact Report Draft. December 7, 1993 2LSA Associates. Biological Survey of North Etiwanda. November 1994 Table 1 sununarizes the approximate acreage of each plant community. The communities are summarized as follows: 3.1.2 Shrub Scrub Dominated Communities The majority of the Nature Sanctuaries are characterized by scrub-dominated plant communities. These scrubland types include sage scrubs, which are dominated by soft-leaved drought deciduous species, and chaparrals dominated by woody evergreen species. Riversidan Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub (Alluvial Scrub) - there are an estimated __ acres of alluvial scrub within the Nature Sanctuaries. This community is found on the coastal base of the Transverse range and on a few isolated alluvial fans on the cismontane base of the Penninsular Range. In the Nature Sanctuaries, alluvial scrub also covers most of the gently sloping alluvial fan surfaces that have not been recently subjected to scouring by flood waters. This variety of substrate comprises the large majority of the site. The CDFG and the USFWS are concerned about the continued losses of alluvial sage scrub, the rarest sub-association of Coastal Sage Scrub. The CDFG'S Natural Diversity Data Base ranks alluvial scrub SI.1 (very threatened) and a G1 (global level) rare natural community. This is the highest ranking used by the CDFG in its inventory of rare natural communities and receives high priority ranking for preservation. Chamise Chaparral (CH) - Approximately_ acres of CH occur on the Preserve primarily on south facing slopes. Ceanothus Chaparral/Riversidian Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub (CC/Alluvial Scrub) or Alluvial Chaparral - Approximately_ acres of this mixed scmbland occur on the south-central portion of the Preserve. This large area of shrubland has been visibly evident on aerial photographs since the 1930's and has been described as Alluvial Chaparral in recent floristic treatments (Barbour and Wirka, 1997). 3.1.3 Herbaceous Species Dominated Communities There are two communities on the site dominated by herbaceous plant species: non-native grassland and disturbed. Non-native Grassland (NNG) - A small area of non-native grassland, totaling __ acres, are currently described. One area is located to the east of Etiwanda Creek levee road and below the road along the lower toe of the hill. It is anticipated that this area will naturally recover back to AFSS due ti 2003 wildfire. Disturbed (D) - There are approximately __ additional acres within the Nature Sanctuaries that have been disturbed. It should be noted that portions of the Nature Sanctuaries that are not considered disturbed where affected by past agricultural cleating and are recovering from these activities. Other disturbed areas are associated with road easements and unauthorized vehicles, equestrian use and human disturbances. 3.2 Threatened, Rare, or Endangered Species The North Etiwanda area supports a number of sensitive plant and wildlife species, several of which are Federal or State listed threatened or endangered. Several California Species of Special Concern and also occur within or nearby the Preserve. Listed species that may occur within the Nature Sanctuaries include the least Bell's vireo, California gnatcatcher, the southwestern willow flycatcher and San Bemardino Merriam's kangaroo rat. Sensitive species include: Los Angeles pocket mouse, San Diego black-tailed jackrabbit, American badger, Coastal cactus wren, San Diego homed lizard, coastal western whiptail, Southern sagebrush lizard, San Bemardino ringneck snake, coastal rosy boa, coastal patch-nose snake, mountain yellow-legged frog, and two-striped garter snake, Party's spineflower, and Plummer's mafiposa lily. 4. MANAGEMENT GOALS~ OBJECTIVES~ AND ACTIONS Sections 4.1 to 4.5 will be described and specified each year in the annual work plan developed by the Board of Directors in cooperation with biological consultants. Annual work plans will be developed by the Board of Directors with substantive input from consultants that are qualified professional biologists and botanists. All annual activities that involve natural resource management, restoration and biological monitoring will be based upon specific plans with the assistance of qualified biologists and/or botanists as appropriate. Specific plans that deal with vegetation and plant-related issues will be developed with the assistance of qualified botanists experienced with native plant ecology and onsite plant communities. Where these activities could potentially affect wildlife species, a qualified wildlife biologist will be consulted. Implementation of these activities will be overseen and supervised by qualified botanists and biologists. Volunteers, students, conservation corps crews, or other sources of labor may be used. The Board of Directors will investigate hiring a professional natural resource manager on a part time basis to oversee annual work planning and preserve management activities. The central management issue that affects the success of the Nature Sanctuaries is the protection and preservation of all species, habitats, and natural features and ecosystem processes existing on site. To that end, the Management Plan identifies five principal goals: 1) Conservation of Native Species, Habitats, and Ecosystem Processes 2) Protection of Cultural Resources 3) Monitoring Existing Habitats, Species and Physical Conditions 4) Restoration of On-Site Habitats 5) Develop and Maintain an Informational Database Action Hierarchy In addition to describing management actions, the Management Plan also identifies a recommended hierarchy of relative priority. The action hierarchy consists of: First Priority Critical actions to be initiated immediately on availability of funding. Second Priority Those less critical actions to be completed under the annual work plan in years where funding is available in excess of that needed to implement first priority actions. Additional Actions Those actions are to be completed using funds from independent sources, and/or through coordination with easement holders, local jurisdictions, resource agencies, etc. Permissible Actions These actions can be completed at any time, do on available funding, and are generally associated with activities that can be initiated by volunteer or service-related organizations. Associated with each goal are specific management objectives, and actions needed to accomplish the objectives. Management objectives together with prioritized actions are described for each major goal in sections 4.1 through 4.5. 4.1 Goal: Conservation of Native Species, Habitats and Ecosystem Processes Protecting the Nature Sanctuaries from detrimental affects is central to the mandate of perpetual conservation of species, habitat, and ecosystem processes. Therefore, avoidance and minimization of impacts associated with public access and adjacent land uses is a vital component of the management of the Nature Sanctuaries. 4.1.1 Objective: Achieve and maintain Site Protection Through Security and Monitoring Authorized access is currently restricted to such agencies as the Cucamonga Water Company and U.S. Forest Service. The Cucamonga Water Company has placed heavy duty security gates on primary entry points to protect their facilities on the property. To the detriment of the Nature Sanctuaries and conservation needs, the Cucamonga Water District fails to insure that the gates remain closed. In addition, the County and Open Space District fail to provide guard monitoring and penalties with fines to unauthorized users. Therefore, the Board of Directors may seek legal action against easement holders and adjacent landowners that are not cooperating with conservation needs and goals. Other vehicle entry points will be identified and blocked by gates, boulder and barriers. Aerial photos and site surveys will be used to detect entry points. Access roads and easements used by Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (LADWP), SBCFCD, CWC, and the U.S. Forest Service will be maintained by those agencies. All other roads will be barricaded with large boulders or other effective barriers. First Priority Actions · Regular site monitoring and patrol will be performed. The purpose of the site monitoring will be to check for evidence of incompatible human activities such as trash dumping, vehicular encroachments, shooting, gate damage, equestrians etc. Remedial action, such as barricade enhancements, will be performed as necessary. The purpose of patrol is to provide, through official presence and enforcement, a deterrent to incompatible activities. Institute a system of regular patrolling of accessible preserve perimeter areas, internal road system, and other areas as appropriate. A private security service may be retained to implement regular patrols. Patrolling should be sufficiently intensive to establish an active presence and timed to deter unauthorized activities, including night patrols as needed. Patrolling needs will be re-evaluated each year, and adjusted as appropriate. Surveyed property comer markers will be established and maintained. · Trash will be removed when discovered. · Signs will be posted along essential roads advising public visitors that the Nature Sanctuary is an important habitat area, off limits to unauthorized public use. A phone number will be included on signs so that access may be requested. · Perimeter signage identifying the Nature Sanctuaries and No Tresspassing will be installed at all points of entry by gates. These signs will list restrictions and cite enforcing ordinances. 9 Block all known points of unauthorized vehicular access with large boulders or similarly effective barriers, and maintain as necessary. · The discharge of firearms will be restricted using signage and patrols. Human impacts on sensitive habitats (e.g. trail use, ORV impacts, trash accumulation) will be monitored and appropriate counter measures will be implemented. · Develop protocols for emergency situations. · The occurrence of human activities incompatible with the purpose and goals of this plan will be monitored. Proposals to restrict and prevent these activities, and to remedy damage, will be developed for inclusion in the annual work program. Emphasis must be placed on activities that negatively affect the habitat. Initial restrictions will include motorized vehicles, mountain bikes, horses, and dogs. Public access will also be limited to daylight hours. Second Priority Actions: · Additional patrol or monitoring may further curtail illegal dumping and vandalism. Additional Actions:. · All utility service vehicles will be restricted to designated access roads, official utility work, and normal business hours. · Permissible maintenance activities associated with fire protection or flood control operations shall be detailed in a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) between the City of Rancho Cucumonga. SBFCD, County Fire Department, Open Space District Board, County Roads Department and the Army Corps of Engineers. · The Board of Directors staff shall solicit additional funding for removal of graffiti from structures, walls, boulders, etc., within the Nature Sanctuaries. · The Board of Directors shall solicit additional funding for patrols and/or security when warranted. Permissible Actions: Volunteer and/or service-related organizations may be enlisted for the collection and disposal of trash, removal of graffiti, etc. · Volunteers will be encouraged to be onsite at key times during the first few years, to inform users of appropriate activities and aid in protecting onsite resources. Volunteers and local neighborhood watch groups may assist in patrolling the Nature Sanctuaries and reporting of illegal activities to the Board of Directors. 4.1.2 Objective: Manage Public Access The management of the Nature Sanctuaries will provide for public access, by request, on foot into for passive hiking and nature study in a manner that insures use levels are compatible with habitat protection and conservation. First Priority actions: · Identify existing roads and trails that may have foot access. This shall not include sensitive areas used by rare and endangered species for nesting, etc. In order to discourage access to habitat used by rare, threatened and endangered species no public hiking trails will lead to or through this sensitive area and "No Trespassing" signs will be posted. · Develop and implement a system to provide a reasonable estimate of visitor use levels and activity areas. This may include visitor logs, registration box, volunteer surveys, and other appropriate methods. · Should authorized passive recreational use levels reduce habitat values or impair wildlife use of key areas, further access restrictions will be implemented. This could include seasonal closures, closure of critical areas, restrictions on open days and times of day, or conversion to a docent-lead program with guided access only. These restrictions may be needed in the future should intensive urban development dramatically increase adverse human impacts to the area. Initial restrictions will include unauthorized motorized vehicles, bicycles, horses and dogs. Public access will also be limited to daylight hours. 4.1.3 Objective: Manage Easements and Roads There are a number of unimproved and unauthorized dirt roads that traverse the Nature Sanctuaries. Some of these roads function as service roads providing access to water facilities and equipment owned by the Cucamonga Water Company. The U.S. Forest Service has access roads which serve the San Bemardino National Forest. Maintenance of necessary roads will be the responsibility of the respective easement holders. All maintenance activities shall be environmentally sensitive and restricted to the roadbed. Routine maintenance activities will be limited to minimal re-grading of the road bed, and other activities as agreed. No take of listed species resulting from operational use and maintenance of easements is authorized. Such take can only be authorized through consultation with the appropriate wildlife agency. First Priority Actions: The Board of Directors will work with all easement holders to identify existing legal easements that are in use and to identify easements that are not in use. Withdrawal of unused and unnecessary easements will be encouraged, and establishment of new easements will be prevented, unless established for the sole purpose of habitat conservation. · All unofficial or unnecessary roads and trails will be blocked and revegetated. Revegetation of closed roads can be passive or active as appropriate. · Keys to the Nature Sanctuary will be issued by the President of The Habitat Trust. Key holders will be reported in the annual work plan. · The Board of Directors shall coordinate with the Cucamonga Water Company regarding any proposed future expansion of water delivery system on Nature Sanctuary lands. Any expansion resulting in biological impacts in the Nature Sanctuary will be opposed by the Board and legal challenges may be pursued. Any impacts to the Nature Sanctuaries must be avoided, minimized, and mitigated to the maximum extent practicable. Additional Actions: · Maintenance of utility and/or easement roads will be the responsibility of the easement holder. All maintenance activities shall be environmentally sensitive. and restricted to the easement road. Routine maintenance activities will be restricted and limited to minimal re-grading of the road bed, use of approved weed control methods, and other activities as agreed. Any erosion of hydrological impacts caused by easement roads will require remediation by easement holders. Efforts will be made to coordinate the activities of the SBCFCD and the Water Company in order to avoid and minimize further disturbance of habitat within and contiguous with the Nature Sanctuaries. A Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) between the Board, SBCFCD, and Water Company will be sought. Coordination will occur with the SBCFCD and the Water Company to limit service vehicles and personnel to designated service and access roads. 4.1.4 Objective: Develop and Implement a Fire Management Plan A fire management plan will be developed in coordination with the local fire districts, California Department of Forestry, the U.S. Forest Service and County Fire Department. The fire management plan will constitute an addendum to this Management Plan. Until this fire management plan is adopted and approved by all of the above agencies, the following actions will be addressed in the annual work plan. First Priority Actions: · In coordination with local and State fire agencies, develop an interim fire plan directed at protecting sensitive habitats on the Nature Sanctuaries from being impacted by emergency fire breaks. · No camping and no campfires will be allowed within the Nature Sanctuaries. Every effort will be made to communicate the danger of fire and smoking to the authorized public visitors of the Nature Sanctuaries. Night patrols may be required if signs of campfires are detected. Additional Actions: By means of special agreement with the City, County, and U.S. Forest Service, weed abatement and brush reduction will not be permitted within and adjacent to Nature Sanctuaries. 4.1.5 Objective: Manage the Urban Interface The Board of Directors may work with the City of Rancho Cucumonga and San Bemardino County to seek appropriate low density and open space designations for areas adjoining the Nature Sanctuaries in order to minimize the impacts of future urbanization on the habitat areas. New developments must leave an adequate buffer area to protect the Nature Sanctuaries. Such buffers must come from adjacent developing lands. In no case will Nature Sanctuaries be considered a buffer for adjoining development or an open space for an adjoining development. Maintaining continuity and linkage with other natural open space through the directed use of mitigation will be a priority. The Board of Directors may take legal action against local governments, agencies and developers if development and infrastructure projects threatened the protection and conservation of Nature Sanctuaries habitat and/or wildlife values. The occurrence of human activities incompatible with the goals of this plan will be monitored, and proposals to restrict and prevent these activities will be developed for inclusion in the annual work plans. First Priority Actions: Signage and barricades will be installed to deter uncontrolled access into the Nature Sanctuaries. · Perimeter signage identifying the Nature Sanctuaries will be installed at designated points of entry into the lands. · "No Trespassing" signage will be installed along controlled points of entry. Additional Actions: · The Board of Directors will coordinate with the County of San Bemardino and the City of Rancho Cucumonga to assure that any residential or other developments adjacent to or nearby the Nature Sanctuaries, or to contiguous habitat, are conditioned to include adequate set-backs, cat-proof walls, and any other appropriate protective measures. The Board of Directors may take legal actions to protect and conserve Nature Sanctuaries habitat and wildlife values. Permissible Actions: · The District Board may coordinate occasional field trips with local schools, Chaffey College, California State University, San Bemardino, other institutions upon request of the institution or its representative. · Nominate and register the Nature Sanctuaries as a State and National Historical Landmark. 4.1.6 Objective: Manage Hydrology The vegetative diversity and structure of the creeks and washes within the Nature Sanctuaries are dependent on periodic flooding. Without this periodic hydrologic disturbance, natural succession will lead to increased vegetative cover and changes in plant composition, resulting in an overall loss of landscape-scale heterogeneity and biodiversity. The SBCFCD provides facilities for flood control and is responsible for the planning, construction, and maintenance of regional flood control facilities within San Beruardino County. The SBCFCD has flood control easements within Etiwanda Creek. The creek is large, active drainage subject to flooding. No take of listed species associated with the operation and maintenance of these flood control facilities is authorized. Such take can only be authorized through consultation with wildlife agencies. First Priority Actions: · Any new flood activities on or affecting the Nature Sanctuaries will be limited by coordination with the SBCFCD. More precise definitions of easement grants will be sought. · The Board of Directors will coordinate with the SBCFCD to minimize any potential hydrological impacts to habitat and wildlife values. · The Board of Directors shall also coordinate with the SBCFCD to minimize disturbance to alluvial scrub and other habitats during maintenance activities within flood control easements. Existing on-site washes and ravines shall be conserved to allow natural flow of water and sediment. A plan will be developed and implemented to obtain accurate information on subsurface and surface water levels within the Nature Sanctuaries. Should additional monitoring wells, peizometers, or other techniques require physical installations that may cause ground disturbance, impacts will be minimized and emphasize use of existing access and disturbed areas. Additional Actions: Board of Directors shall request SBCFCD and Open Space District to incorporate preventative measures with their levees, such as fencing, gates and other barriers that restrict access into the Nature Sanctuaries. Legal actions may be taken if Districts and local governments fail to cooperate with such requests. · The Board of Directors shall coordinate with SBCFCD and other responsible companies, government agencies and parties to restore habitats on Nature Sanctuary lands disturbed by the construction of any new or modified levees or other disturbances. Legal actions may be taken if Districts, local governments or other responsible parties that fail to cooperate with such requests. 4.1.7 Objective: Control Exotic Species The introduction and invasion of exotic species of plants and animals is a threat to all habitat preserves. Each year the annual work plan will direct control measures toward exotic species determined through biological monitoring to be a threat to native species and habitats on the Preserve. First Priority Action: · Eradication of any occurrence of noxious weeds may be contracted to a qualified specialist. Noxious weeds include but are not limited to tree tobacco, caster bean, salt cedar, cocklebur, giant reed, thistle and German ivy. Second Priority Action: Eradication of other invasive exotic plants, particularly those occurring on the most sensitive areas on the Preserve, may be contracted to a qualified specialist. Such invasive exotic plants include mustards, Mediterranean annual grasses, etc. Permissible Action: · Brown-headed cowbird trapping may be encouraged. Eradication of exotic plants on the Nature Sanctuaries by volunteer organizations will be encouraged by the Board of Directors. 4.2 Goal: Protection of Cultural Resources Cultural resources will be identified and protected. The Board oupervisors will seek the assistance Gabrielino-Shoshone Nation in defining objectives and actions. 4.2.1 Objective: Manage Cultural Resources Without Interference First priority action: · Coordinate with the Gabrielino-Shoshone Nation to facilitate access for ceremonial activities and to allow collection of white sage and other ceremonial materials, where such collection does not result in take of listed species. Encourage small-scale and sustainable collection of ceremonial material while enforcing against large scale and unsustainable collection. 4.3 Goal: Monitor Biological Resources and Ecosystem Processes Management of species, habitat, and ecosystem processes is critical to maintaining the biological value of the Nature Sanctuaries. Biological monitoring involves ongoing measurement of habitat and species variables with the goal of adapting management strategies to address adverse trends. This monitoring will include vegetation surveys, and analysis, designed to quantify vegetation structure and species distribution and to detect changes over time. 4.3.1 Objective: Perform Regular and Scientifically Sound Biological Monitoring Sound management of the Nature Sanctuaries will require ongoing monitoring of the species, habitats, and ecosystem processes. This monitoring shall be performed by a qualified institution or consultant which can benefit from the opportunity and also provide the required level of service. First Priority Actions: · Develop and implement a plan to monitor long term vegetation change. The plan should address vegetation monitoring for each representative habitat type, with emphasis on alluvial scrub and riparian communities. Data to be obtained will include species richness, species cover, vegetation height, riparian tree vigor, and changes in the distribution of non-native species. These data will be collected using plots, transects, and photo-points monitored at least 5-year intervals. · Lists of plant, bird mammal reptile, and amphibian species, including distributional and ecological status, will be maintained with annual updates. Biological monitoring of restored habitat may be performed annually to track success criteria and provide direction for future restoration efforts. · Biological monitoring may include the preparation of onsite visit reports, annual reports on the surveyed species and habitats, and restored areas. The reports will include management recommendations for the enhancement of species, habitat, and ecosystem process on the Nature Sanctuaries. These reports will contribute to the baseline biological information available about the Nature Sanctuaries, and will provide enhancement direction toward subsequent annual work plans. Additional Actions: The Board of Directors may solicit additional funds to conduct supplemental plant and/or wildlife surveys as needed, to conduct special research programs when warranted or take legal actions as needed. · All study proposals must be submitted to the Board of Directors for approval. Studies will be encouraged that add information regarding the biology of the plants and animals that depend upon the habitats within and nearby the Nature Sanctuaries. No studies will be permitted that damage sensitive habitats. The Nature Sanctuaries are available for non-intrusive, non-manipulative scientific study by approval of requests made to the Board of Directors. No "take" of any species shall be permitted within Nature Sanctuaries, regardless if permits and approvals have been given by CDFG and USFWS. Permissible Actions: · Promote public annual surveys, such as the Audubon Christmas bird count, on the Nature Sanctuaries. 4.4 Goal: Restore Disturbed Habitats on the Preserve Restoration includes activities that improve habitat value and correct problems that degrade local and/or overall habitat value. This is accomplished by returning pre-disturbance vegetation structure and function to disturbed areas. 4.4.1 Objective: Develop and Implement Restoration Plans First Priority Actions: · Identify and prioritize areas that would benefit from restoration, revegetation, and erosion control. Emphasis will be placed on restoration efforts that can be feasibly implemented using available techniques. Develop and implement specific restoration plans and success criteria for key habitat within disturbed areas within the Nature Sanctuaries. It is anticipated that restoration efforts may be implemented in small scale projects phased, over time. Ripping should only be performed on surfaces where compaction is preventing natural re-colonization. All restoration will be performed under the guidance of a restoration ecologist, and utilize only seeds and/or cuttings collected from the Etiwanda alluvial fan complex. All restored areas may be monitored annually to assess success criteria and provide direction to future restoration projects. · Identify and implement erosion control measures at critical sites, particularly at locations where there is potential for damage to expand. Second Priority Action: Removal of exotic species and other remediation of restoration areas will be performed as needed to meet success criteria. Additional Action: The Board of Directors may solicit funding for restoration of alluvial scrub habitat and others as needed. Permissible Action: · The District Board may coordinate volunteer and/or service related organizations to assist in restoration projects within the Nature Sanctuaries. · Experimentally based restoration of areas dominated by non-native grasslands may be implemented with outside funding and expertise. Such restoration efforts through academic research, or off-site mitigation will be encouraged. 4.5 Goal: Develop and maintain an Informational Database A thorough, well-organized, and accessible database of biological and land use information is a vital tool for Nature Sanctuary management. The database will be initiated as part of the first annual work plan, and will be updated and compiled annually. 4.5.1 Objective: Identify Baseline Habitat Values and Site Conditions This portion of the database is directed toward aiding planning and long-term monitoring efforts through development ofa GIS database and other technical information soumes. This database should be compiled prior to implementation of major pro-active management activities. First Priority Actions: · Develop map-based inventories and data of existing conditions and resources. · Data layers to be obtained include: baseline topography, baseline aerial photograph, streams, washes, floodplains, vegetation polygons, localities of rare species, localities of noxious weeds, restoration areas, existing road system, access points, trash problem areas, easements, structural improvements, and adjacent parcel maps. · Develop and implement a plan to create a baseline vegetation map using currently accepted, floristically based, classification schemes. · Utilize global positioning system (GPS) to locate and map property comers, key features, permanent vegetation plots, etc. Obtain a new color aerial photograph of the Nature Sanctuaries every five years to aid in tracking long-term changes in vegetation and other site conditions. These photographs should be of fine resolution. For GIS purposes, these photographs should be as ordered as ortho-rectified digital imagery. Permissible Action: · Promote the database to geography programs at local colleges and universities with educational programs in GIS. Student GIS projects related to the Nature Sanctuary may be encouraged. 5.1 Amendments and Addendums to the Management Plan This Management Plan may, by vote of the Board of Directors, be amended or receive addenda, provided such changes are consistent with the conservation purposes. 5.2 Availability of Funds Implementation of this Management Plan by The Habitat Trust is subject to the availability of appropriated funds and/or endowments. Date: October 8, 2003 Leeona Klippstein, President The Habitat Trust for Wildlife THE HABITAT TRUST FOR WILDLIFE NATURE SANCTUARY MONITORING REPORT Thank you for your assistance in monitoring the North Etiwanda Nature Sanctuaries of The Habitat Trust. Please fill out the report form to the best of your abilities and return the report as soon as possible to; The Habitat Trust for Wildlife ATTN.: Marlene Tmnnell, Secretary 30 North Raymond Avenue, Suite 303 Pasadena, CA 91103 REPORTER NAME DATE TIME AM/PM AFFILIATION/ORGANIZATION QUALIFICATIONS LOCATION (Upper East Etiwanda Watershed) (Falls) (Lower East Etiwanda Creek) (East Etiwanda Canyon) (Between Etiwanda & Henderson Canyons) (Upper Henderson Watershed) (Henderson Canyon) OTHER WEATHER CONDITIONS VIOLATION/S Dumping (observed and/or evidence) Explain Motorized Vehicle/s (observed and/or evidence) Explain Equestrian (observed and/or evidence) Explain SIGNAGE - Where Signs Posted? Removed? Shot Up? Replaced? REPORTERS CONTACT INFORMATION E-MAIL PHONE ( ). ZIP A DRESS THE HABITAT TRUST FOR WILDLIFE NATURE SANCTUARY MONITORING REPORT OTHER (If you need more writing room, please use the back of the page. Thank you.) THE HABITAT TRUST FOR WILDLIFE NATURE SANCTUARY MONITORING REPORT - SPECIES LIST If you do not know the name of a species or are not absolutely sure --- PLEASE DESCRIBE THE SPECIES TO THE BEST OF YOUR ABILITIES and HOW MANY OF THE SAME SPECIES WERE SEEN TOGETHER including the approximate location within or adjacent to the Nature Sanctuary. Thank you. FISH # SEEN NOTES Arroyo chub Observed Santa Aha speckled dace Observed Santa Ana sucker Observed AMPHIBIANS Arroyo southwestern toad Observed Coast range newt Observed California Legless lizard Observed California red-legged frog Observed Mountain yellow-legged frog Observed Western spade-foot toad Observed Western skink Observed Yellow-blotched salamander Observed REPTILES Coast Patch-nosed snake Observed Coastal Rosy boa Observed Coastal western whiptail Observed Collared Lizard Observed Night snake Observed Orange throated whiptail lizard Observed San Diego banded gecko Observed San Diego homed lizard Observed San Bemardino mountain king snake Observed San Bemardino ring-neck snake Observed Southern Alligator lizard. Observed ~.~ Two-striped garter snake Observed Western Yellowbelly Racer snake Observed "~ Observed ~) Spiny Blue Granite Lizard THE HABITAT TRUST FOR WILDLIFE NATURE SANCTUARY MONITORING REPORT - SPECIES LIST BIRDS # SEEN NOTES Acorn Woodpecker Observed American Goldfinch Observed American Kestrel Observed Anna's Hummingbird Observed Ash-throated Flycatcher Observed Ashy mfous-crowned sparrow Observed Band-tailed Pigeon Observed Barn Owl Observed Barn Swallow Observed Bell's sage sparrow Observed Belted Kingfisher Observed Bewick's Wren Observed Black-chinned Hummingbird Observed Black-chinned Sparrow Observed Black-headed Grosbeak Observed Black Phoebe Observed Black shouldered Kite Observed Black Throated, Gray Warbler Observed Blue-gray Gnatcatcher Observed Blue Grosbeak Observed Brewer's Blackbird Observed Brewer's Sparrow Observed Burrowing owl Observed Cactus wren Observed California Gnatcatcher Observed California Thrasher Observed California Towhee Observed California Quail Observed Canyon Wren Observed Cassin's Kingbird Observed Cedar Waxwing Observed THE HABITAT TRUST FOR WILDLIFE NATURE SANCTUARY MONITORING REPORT - SPECIES LIST BIRDS (continued) # SEEN NOTES Chipping sparrow Observed Cliff Swallow Observed Common Bushtit Observed Common Crow Observed Common Raven Observed Common Snipe Observed Cooper's hawk Observed Costa's Hummingbird Observed Dark-eyed Junco Observed Dipper Observed Downy Woodpecker Observed Dusky Flycatcher Observed Ferruginous Hawk Observed Golden-crowned Sparrow Observed Golden eagle Observed Great Blue Heron Observed Great homed Owl Observed Greater Roadrunner Observed Hairy Woodpecker Observed Hammond's Flycatcher Observed Hermit Thrush Observed Hooded Oriole Observed Homed lark Observed House Finch Observed House Sparrow Observed House Wren Observed Hutton's Vireo Observed Killdeer Observed Lark Sparrow Observed Lazuli Bunting Observed Bell's Vireo Observed Least THE HABITAT TRUST FOR WILDLIFE NATURE SANCTUARY MONITORING REPORT - SPECIES LIST BIRDS (continued) # SEEN NOTES Lesser Goldfinch Observed Lesser Nighthawk Observed Loggerhead shrike Observed Long-eared owl Observed Mallard Duck Observed Mockingbird Observed Mountain Chickadee Observed Mountain quail Observed Mourning Dove Observed Nashville Warbler Observed Northem Flicker Observed Northern harrier Observed Northern Oriole Observed Nuttall's Woodpecker Observed Oak Titmouse Observed Olive-sided Flycatcher Observed Orange-crowned Warbler Observed Pacific Slope Flycatcher Observed Peregrine Falcon Observed Phainopepla Observed Pine Siskin Observed Poorwill Observed Prairie Falcon Observed Red-breasted Sapsucker Observed Red-tailed Hawk Observed Robin Observed Rock Dove Observed Rock Wren Observed Rough winged Swallow Observed Ruby-crowned Kinglet Observed Rufous-crowned Sparrow Observed Rufous Hummingbird Observed THE HABITAT TRUST FOR WILDLIFE NATURE SANCTUARY MONITORING REPORT - SPECIES LIST BIRDS (continued) # SEEN NOTES Say's Phoebe Observed Scrub Jay/Blue Jay Observed Sharp-shinned hawk Observed Short-eared Owl Observed Song Sparrow Observed Sofa Rail Observed Southwestern Willow flycatcher Observed Spotted Towhee Observed Steller's Jay Observed Turkey Vulture Observed Vaux's swift Observed Vesper Sparrow Observed Violet-green Swallow Observed Warbling Vireo Observed Western Bluebird Observed Western Kingbird Observed Western Meadowlark Observed Western Screech Owl Observed Western Tanager Observed Western wood Peewee Observed White-breasted Nuthatch Observed White-crowned Sparrow Observed White-throated Swift Observed Witson's Warbler Observed Wrentit Observed Yellow Warbler Observed Yellow-rumped Warbler Observed Yellowthroat Warbler Observed Brown-headed Cowbird (non-native) Observed European Starling (non-native) Observed THE HABITAT TRUST FOR WILDLIFE NATURE SANCTUARY MONITORING REPORT - SPECIES LIST MAMMALS # SEEN NOTES American badger Observed Black bear Observed Bobcat Observed Coyote Observed Grey Fox Observed Los Angeles pocket mouse Observed Mountain lion Observed Mule Deer Observed Pallid bat Observed Ringtail cat Observed San Bemardino kangaroo rat Observed San Diego black-tailed jackrabbit Observed San Diego desert woodrat Observed San Diego pocket mouse Observed Southern grasshopper mouse Observed Stephen's kangaroo rat Observed Townsend's big-eared bat Observed Yuma myotis Observed PLANTS Ashy spike-moss Observed California androsace Observed California muhly Observed Many-stemmed dudleya Observed Nevin's barberry Observed Orabanchi Observed Party's spineflower Observed Pious daisy Observed Plummer's baccharis Observed Plummer's mariposa lily Observed Rock monardella Observed Slender-homed spineflower Observed black walnut Observed Southem California THE HABITAT TRUST FOR WILDLIFE NATURE SANCTUARY MONITORING REPORT - SPECIES LIST OTHER SPECIES # SEEN NOTES Curriculum Vitae 109 Luz Place Bom May 3, 1963 in Davis, CA 95616 Sacramento, California. Phone (530) 7564598 Married, father of two children. puma@davis.com Affiliations: BioResource Consultants Consulting in the Public Interest, www.cipi.com Biological Sciences Department, California State University, Sacramento Disciplines: Wildlife, ecosystem and landscape ecology; conservation biology; sampling methods and systems analysis; agricultural ecology, animal damage management. Education: Ph.D. Ecology, University of California, Davis. September 1990. M.S. Ecology, University of California, Davis. June 1987. B.S. Anthropology, University of California, Davis. June 1985. Corcoran High School, Corcoran, California. June 1981. Experience: · 177 professional publications, including: · 49 peer reviewed publications · 22 in non-peer reviewed professional outlets · 97 reports and declarations · 8 in mass media outlets · 2 book reviews · 58 public presentations of research results at professional meetings · 67 papers reviewed by me for professional publications Consulting Ecologist, 7/04 to present, California Energy Commission (CEC). In collaboration with Lawrence-Livermore National Lab, I perform independent research funded by the CEC on bird behavior in the Altamont Pass Wind Resources Area. I also provide consulting services as needed to the CEC. Pan-time Faculty, 1/98 to present, California State University, Sacramento. I have taught Contemporary Environmental Issues, Natural Resources Conservation, Mammalogy, Behavioral Ecology, and Ornithology Lab. Senior Ecologist, 1999 to present, BioResource Consultants. I plan research and monitoring projects, perform fieldwork, and analyze complex data related to avian fatalities at wind turbines, avian electrocutions on electric distribution poles across California, and avian fatalities at transmission lines. Systems Ecologist, 7/96 to present, Consulting in the Public Interest. I am part ora multi-disciplinary consortium of scientists who facilitate large-scale, environmental planning projects and litigation. We provide risk assessments, assessments of management practices, and expert witness testimony. Smallwood CV 2 Chairman, Conservation Affairs Committee, The Wildlife Society--Western Section, 1999-2001. Systems Ecologist, 1/95 to present, Institute for Sustainable Development. I head ISD's program on integrated resoumes management. I develop indicators of ecological integrity for large areas, using remotely sensed data, local community involvement and GIS. Associate, 1997-1998, Department of Agronomy and Range Science, University of California, Davis. Associate Editor, Journal of Wildlife Management, duties begin March 2004. Editorial Board Member, Environmental Management, 10/99 to present. Editorial Board Member, Ecosystem Health, 9/02 to present. Lead Scientist, 6/96 to 6/99, National Endangered Species Network. I headed NESN's efforts to inform academic scientists and environmental activists about emerging issues regarding the Endangered Species Act and other environmental laws pertaining to legally rare species. I also testified at public hearings on behalf of environmental groups and endangered species. Ecologist, 1/97 to 6/98, Western Foundation of Vertebrate Zoology. I conducted field research to determine the impact of past mercury mining on the status of red-legged frogs in Santa Clara County, California. Associate Editor, Biological Conservation, 9/94 to 9/95. Administered independent scientific reviews of submitted, professional papers in ecology and conservation biology, and made recommendations to the Editors. Senior Systems Ecologist, 7/94 to 12/95, EIP Associates, Sacramento, California. Provided consulting services in environmental planning. I also developed a quantitative assessment of land units for their conservation and restoration opportunities, using the ecological resource requirements of 29 legally rare species. I mapped vegetation and land use, and derived new spatial data from a GIS overlay of these variables with soil types, flood zones, roads, and other spatially referenced data. Using these derived data, I developed a set of indicators for prioritizing areas within Yolo County that will receive mitigation funds for habitat easements and restoration. Post-Graduate Reseamher, 10/90 to 6/94, with Dr. Shu Geng, Department of Agronomy and Range Science, U.C. Davis. Studied landscape and management effects on temporal and spatial patterns of abundance among pocket gophers and species of Falconiformes and Carnivora in the Sacramento Valley. I also developed and analyzed a data base of energy use in California agriculture, and I assisted with a landscape (GIS) study of groundwater contamination across Tulare County, California. Co-teacher, 1/91 to 6/91 and 1/93 to 6/93, Graduate Group in Ecology, U.C. Davis. Co-taught conservation biology with Dr. Christine Schonewald. Reader, 3/90 to 6/90, Department of Psychology, U.C. Davis. Assisted students of Psychobiology (taught by Dr. Richard Coss) with reseamh and writing term papers. Research Assistant, 11/88 to 9/90, with Dr. Walter E. Howard, Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Biology, U.C. Davis. Tested durable baits for pocket gopher control in forest plantations, and developed gopher sampling methods. Smallwood CV 3 Fulbright Research Fellow, Indonesia, 7/88 to 11/88. Tested use of new sampling methods for monitoring the number of Sumatran tigers and six other species of endemic felids, and evaluated methods used by other researchers. Research Assistant, 7/87 to 6/88, with Dr. Terrell P. Salmon, Wildlife Extension, Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Biology, U.C. Davis. Developed empirical models of mammal and bird invasions in North America, and a rating system for priority research and control of exotic species based on economic, environmental, and human health hazards in California. Student Assistant, 3/85 to 6/87, with Dr. E. Lee Fitzhugh, Wildlife Extension, Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Biology, U.C. Davis. Developed and implemented a statewide mountain lion track count for long-term monitoring of numbers and distribution. Also developed quantitative techniques to identify individual mountain lions by their tracks, and to differentiate mountain lion and dog tracks. Projects Expert Testimony and Declarations on Residential and Commercial Development Proposals. I have testified before the California Coastal Commission, California Energy Commission, County Boards of Supervisors, and City Councils, and I have participated with press conferences and have been deposed by attorneys. I prepared expert witness reports and court declarations, which are summarized under Reports (below). Expert Testimony on Proposed Gas-fired Power Plants. I provided comments letters, declarations, expert reports, and oral testimony on the impacts and appropriate mitigation of natural gas-fired power plants in California. Protocol-level endangered species searches and recovew efforts. I search for special-status species using Department ofFish and Game and US Fish and Wildlife Service protocols. I have searched for, or otherwise worked with, California red-legged frog, arroyo southwestern toad, California tiger salamander, blunt-nosed leopard lizard, western pond turtle, giant kangaroo rat, Fresno kangaroo rat, San Joaquin kit fox, Sumatran tiger, willow flycatcher, least Bell's vireo, western burrowing owl, Swainson's hawk, Valley elderberry longhorn beetle and many other special-status species. I also help with recovery of the Fresno kangaroo rat at Lemoore Naval Air Station. Conservation of the endangered Fresno kangaroo rat. I am performing applied research to identify the factors responsible for the decline of this endangered species at Lemoore Naval Air Station, and am implementing habitat enhancements designed to reverse the trend and to expand the area occupied by this species. Workshops on HCPs. Assisted Dr. Michael Morrison with organizing and conducting a 2-day workshop on Habitat Conservation Plans, sponsored by Southern California Edison, and another 1-day workshop sponsored by PG&E. These Workshops were attended by academics, attorneys, and consultants with I-ICP experience. We guest~edited a Proceedings published in Environmental Management. Research to reduce avian mortality due to wind turbines at Altamont Pass. I am using GPS and GIS to map and study environmental impacts of several thousand wind turbines. 1 am relating the number of raptor fatalities at wind turbines to the degree of aggregation of prey species around the turbines, as well as many other factors related to where the turbines are located, how they are designed and operated, and how raptors behave at Altamont Pass. Mapping of biological resources along Highways 101, 46 and 41. I used GPS and GIS to delineate vegetation complexes and locations of special-status species along 26 miles of highway in San Luis Smallwood CV 4 Obispo County, 14 miles of highway and roadway in Monterey County, and in a large area north of Fresno, including within reclaimed gravel mining pits. GPS mapping and monitoring at restoration sites and at Caltrans mitigation sites. I am monitoring the success of elderberry shrubs at one location, the success of willows at another location, and the response of wildlife to the succession of vegetation at both these sits. I am also using GPS to monitor the response of fossorial animals to yellow star-thistle eradication and natural grassland restoration efforts at Bear Valley, Colusa County, and at the decommissioned Mather Air Force Base in Sacramento County. Memury effects on Red-legged Frog. I assisted Dr. Michael Morrison and US Fish and Wildlife Service in assessing the possible impacts of historical mercury mining on the federally listed California red-legged frog in Santa Clara County. I also measured habitat variables in numerous streams. Opposition to proposed No Surprises rule. I wrote a white paper and summary letter explaining scientific grounds for opposing the incidental take permit (ITP) rules providing 1TP applicants and holders with general assurances they will be free of compliance with the Endangered Species Act once they adhere to the terms of a "properly functioning HCP." I obtained 188 signatures of scientists and environmental professionals on the letter submitted to the US Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service. The letter was also provided to all US Senators. It helped change the prevailing view of HCPs as beneficial to listed species. Natomas Basin Habitat Conservation Plan alternative. I designed narrow channel marsh to increase the likelihood of survival and recovery in the wild of giant garter snake, Swainson's hawk and Valley Elderberry Longhorn Beetle. The design included replication and interspersion of treatments for experimental testing of critical habitat elements. I provided a report to Northern Territories, Inc. Cook et al. v. Rockwell International et al., No. 90-K-181 (D. Colorado). I am providing expert testimony on the role of burrowing animals in affecting the fate of buried and surface-deposited radioactive and hazardous chemical wastes at the Rocky Flats Plant, Colorado. I provided expert reports based on four site visits and the most extensive document review of burrowing animals ever conducted. I conducted transect surveys for evidence of burrowing animals and other wildlife on and around waste facilities. I also discovered substantial intrusion of waste structures by burrowing animals. Hanford Nuclear Reservation Litigation. I am providing expert testimony on the role of burrowing animals in affecting the fate of buried radioactive wastes at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation, Washington. I provided three expert reports based on three site visits and extensive document review. I predicted and verified a certain population density of pocket gophers on buried waste structures, as well as incidence of radionuclide contamination in body tissue. I conducted transect surveys for evidence of burrowing animals and other wildlife on and around waste facilities. I also discovered substantial intrusion of waste structures by burrowing animals. Assessment of Environmental Technology Transfer to China, and Assessment of Agricultural Production System. I twice traveled to China and interviewed scientists, industrialists, agriculturalists, and the Directors of the Chinese Environmental Protection Agency and the Department of Agriculture to assess the need and possible pathways for environmental clean-up technologies and trade opportunities between the US and China. I spent a total of five weeks in China, including in Shandong and Linxion Provinces and in Beijing. Yolo County Habitat Conservation Plan. I conducted the landscape ecology study of Yolo County to identify the priority land units to receive mitigation so as to most improve the ecosystem functionality within the County from the perspective of 29 special-status species of wildlife and plants. 1 used a hierarchically structured indicators approach to apply principles of landscape and ecosystem ecology, Smallwood CV 5 conservation biology, and local values in rating land units. I derived GIS maps to help guide the conservation ama design, and then I developed implementation strategies. Mountain Lion Track Count. I developed and conducted the carnivore monitoring program throughout California since 1985. Species counted include mountain lion, bobcat, black bear, coyote, red and gray fox, raccoon, striped skunk, badger, and black-tailed deer. Vegetation and land use are also monitored. The transect was established on dusty, dirt roads within randomly selected quadrats. These roads are searched for tracks of the carnivores, which routinely use the roads for travel paths. Sumatran Tiger and other Felids. I designed and conducted track counts for seven species of wild cats in Sumatra, including the Sumatran tiger, fishing cat, and golden cat. I spent four months on Sumatra and Java, and learned Bahasa Indonesia (the official Indonesian language). I was awarded a Fulbright Research Fellowship to complete the project. Wildlife in Agriculture. Beginning as my post-graduate research, I have studied pocket gophers and other wildlife in 40 alfalfa fields throughout the Sacramento Valley, and I surveyed for wildlife along a 200 mile road transect for six years. The data were analyzed using GIS and methods from landscape ecology, and the results were published and presented orally to farming groups in California and elsewhere. I also conducted the first study of wildlife in cover crops used on vineyards and orchards. Agricultural Energy Use and Tulare County Groundwater Study. I developed and analyzed a data base of energy use in California agriculture, and collaborated on a landscape (GIS) study of groundwater contamination across Tulare County, California. Pocket Gopher Damage in Forest Clearcuts. I tested various poison baits and baiting regimes for pocket gopher control in forest plantations, and I developed gopher sampling methods. I conducted the most extensive field study of pocket gophers ever, involving thousands of gophers in 68 research plots on 55 clearcuts among 6 National Forests in northern California. Risk Assessment of Exotic Species in North America. I developed empirical models of mammal and bird species invasions in North America, as well as a rating system for assigning priority research and control to exotic species in California, based on economic, environmental, and human health hazards. Smallwood CV 6 Representative Clients Law offices and environmental groups Government agencies Law Offices of Berger & Montague US Department of Agriculture Law Offices of Roy Haber US Forest Service Law Offices of Edward MacDonald US Fish & Wildlife Service Law Office of John Gabrielli US Navy Law Office of Bill Kopper California Energy Commission Law Office of Donald B. Mooney California Department of Fish & Game California Wildlife Federation California Department of Transportation Defenders of Wildlife California Department of Forestry Sierra Club California Department of Food & Agriculture National Endangered Species Network Ventura County Counsel Spirit of the Sage Council County of Yolo The Humane Society Tahoe Regional Planning Agency Hagens Berman LLP Sustainable Agriculture Research & Education Program Environmental Protection Information Center (EPIC) Goldberg, Kamin & Garvin, Attorneys at Law Californians for Renewable Energy (CARE) Seatuck Environmental Association Businesses Other organizations and Individuals Pacific Gas & Electric Co. Don & LaNelle Silverstien Southern California Edison Co. Seventh Day Adventist Chumh Georgia-Pacific Timber Co. Escuela de la Raza Unida Northern Territories Inc. Susan Pelican and Howard Beeman National Renewable Energy Lab Residents Against Inconsistent Development, Inc. David Magney Environmental Consulting Bob Sarvey Wildlife History Foundation Mike Boyd Emerald Farms Hillcroft Neighborhood Fund Terry Preston, Wildlife Ecology Research Center Joint Labor Management Committee of the Retail Food Industry G3 Energy Lisa Rocca Kevin Jackson Smallwood CV 7 Representative special-status species experience Common name Species name Status~ Description Field experience California red-legged frog Rana aurora draytonii FT, CSC Protocol searches & detected at multiple sites Foothill yellow-legged frog Rana boylii FSC, CSC Research and search detections Western spadefoot Spea hammondii FSC, CSC Searches and search detections California tiger salamander Ambystoma californiense FC, CSC Protocol searches & detected in Monterey Co. Coast range newt Taricha torosa torosa CSC Searches and multiple detections Blunt-nosed leopard lizard Gambelia sila FE, CE Detected in San Luis Obispo County California Horned Lizard Phrynosoma coronatum FSC, CSC Search and detected in San Luis Obispo Co. frontale Western pond turtle Clemmys marmorata FSC, CSC Searches and detected at multiple sites San Joaquin kit fox Vulpes macrotis mutica FE, CT Protocol seamhes and detections Sumatran tiger Panthera tigris Research in Sumatra Mountain lion Puma concolor californicus CFP Research and publications Point Arena mountain beaver Aplodontia rufa nigra FI2, CSC Remote camera operation Giant kangaroo rat Dipodomys ingens FE, CE Detected in Cholame Valley Fresno kangaroo rat Dipodomys nitratoides FE, CE Research and conservation at Lemoore Naval Air Station -- reports Monterey dusky-footed Neotomafuscipes luciana FSC, CSC Captures and mapping of dens woodrat Salinas harvest mouse Reithrodontomys megalotus G5T1S1 Captures in the Salinas ama distichlus California clapper rail Rallus longirostris FIE, CE Surveys at Concord Naval Weapons Station Golden eagle Aquila chrysaetos CSC Research in Sacramento Valley Swainson's hawk Buteo swainsoni CT Research in Sacramento Valley Northern harrier Circus cyaeneus CSC Research and publication White-tailed kite Elanus leucurus CFP Research and publication Loggerhead shrike Lanius ludovicianus FSC, CSC Research in Sacramento Valley Least Bell's vireo Vireo bellii pusillus FE, CE Detected in Monterey County Willow flycatcher Empidonax traillii extimus FE, CE Research at breeding sites in high Sierra Nevada Burrowing owl Athene cunicularia hypugia FSC, CSC Research at multiple locations Valley elderberry longhorn Desmocerus californicus FT Research on mitigation site in Central Valley -- beetle dimorphus publication Analytical Arroyo southwestern toad Bufo microscaphus FE, CSC Research and report. californicus Giant garter snake Thamnophis gigas FT, CE Research and publication. Northern goshawk Accipiter gentilis FSC, CSC Research and publication. Northern spotted owl Strix occidentalis FT Research and reports. Publication in progress. ~ FE = Federal Endangered, FT = Federal threatened, FC = Federal candidate for listing, FSC = Federal species of concern, CE = California Endangered, CT = California threatened, CFP = California Fully Protected, CSC = California Species of Concern, GSTISI = CNDDB rating of imperiled throughout California range. Smallwood CV 8 Peer Reviewed Publications: Cain, J. W. III, K. S. Smallwood, M. L. Morrison, and H. L. Loffland. 2005. Influence of mammal activity on nesting success of Passerines. J. Wildlife Management, In press. Smallwood, K.S. 2002. Habitat models based on numerical comparisons. Pages 83-95 in Predicting species occurrences: Issues of scale and accuracy, J. M. Scott, P. J. Heglund, M. Morrison, M. Raphael, J. Haufler, and B. Wall, editors. Island Press, Covello, California. Morrison, M. L., K. S. Smallwood, and L. S. Hall. 2002. Creating habitat through plant relocation: Lessons from Valley elderberry longhorn beetle mitigation. Ecological Restoration 21: 95-100. Zhang, M., K. S. Smallwood, and E. Anderson. 2002. Relating indicators of ecological health and integrity to assess risks to sustainable agriculture and native biota. Pages 757-768 in D.J. Rapport, W.L. Lasley, D.E. Rolston, N.O. Nielsen, C.O. Qualset, and A.B. Damania (eds.), Managing for Healthy Ecosystems, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida USA. Wilcox, B. A., K. S. Smallwood, and J. A. Kahn. 2002. Toward a forest Capital Index. Pages 285-298 in D.J. Rapport, W.L. Lasley, D.E. Rolston, N.O. Nielsen, C.O. Qualset, and A.B. Damania (eds.), Managing for Healthy Ecosystems, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida USA. Smallwood, K.S. 2001. The allometry of density within the space used by populations of Mammalian Carnivores. Canadian Journal of Zoology 79:1634-1640. Smallwood, K.S., and T.R. Smith. 2001. Study design and interpretation of Sorex density estimates. Annales Zoologi Fennici 38:141-161. Smallwood, K.S., A. Gonzales, T. Smith, E. West, C. Hawkins, E. Stitt, C. Keckler, C. Bailey~ and K. Brown. 2001. Suggested standards for science applied to conservation issues. Transactions of the Western Section of the Wildlife Society 36:40-49. Geng, S., Yixing Zhou, Minghua Zhang, and K. Shawn Smallwood. 2001. A Sustainable Agro-ecological Solution to Water Shortage in North China Plain (Huabei Plain). Environmental Planning and Management 44:345-355. Smallwood, K. Shawn, Lourdes Rugge, Stacia Hoover, Michael L. Morrison, Carl Thelander. 2001. Intra- and inter-turbine string comparison of fatalities to animal burrow densities at Altamont Pass. Pages 23- 37 in S. S. Schwartz, ed., Proceedings of the National Avian-Wind Power Planning Meeting IV. RESOLVE, Inc., Washington, D.C. Smallwood, K.S., S. Geng, and M. Zhang. 200].. Comparing pocket gopher (Thomomys bottae) density in alfalfa stands to assess management and conservation goals in northern California. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 87: 93-109. Smallwood, K. S. 200i. Linking habitat restoration to meaningful units of animal demography. Restoration Ecology 9:253-261. Smallwood, K.S. 2000. A crosswalk from the Endangered Species Act to the HCP Handbook and real HCPs. Environmental Management 26, Supplement 1:23-35. Smallwood, K.S., J. Beyea and M. Morrison. 1999. Using the best scientific data for endangered species conservation. Environmental Management 24:42 !-435. Smallwood CV 9 Smallwood, K.S. 1999. Scale domains of abundance among species of Mammalian Carnivora. Environmental Conservation 26:102-111. Smallwood, K.S. 1999. Suggested study attributes for making useful population density estimates. Transactions of the Western Section of the Wildlife Society 35: 76-82. Smallwood, K.S. and M.L. Morrison. 1999. Estimating burrow volume and excavation rate of pocket gophers (Geomyidae). Southwestern Naturalist 44:173-183. Smallwood K.S. and M.L. Morrison. 1999. Spatial scaling of pocket gopher (Geomyidae) density. Southwestern Naturalist 44:73-82. Smallwood K.S. 1999. Abating pocket gophers (Thomomys spp.) to regenerate forests in clearcuts. Environmental Conservation 26:59-65. Smallwood K.S. 1998. Patterns of black bear abundance. Transactions of the Western Section of the Wildlife Society 34:32-38. Smallwood K.S. 1998. On the evidence needed for listing northern goshawks (Accipter gentilis) under the Endangered Species Act: a reply to Kennedy. J. Raptor Research 32:323-329. Smallwood K.S., B. Wilcox, R. Leidy, and K. Yarris. 1998. Indicators assessment for Habitat Conservation Plan of Yolo County, California, USA. Environmental Management 22: 947-958. Smallwood K.S., M.L. Morrison, and J. Beyea. 1998. Animal burrowing attributes affecting hazardous waste management. Environmental Management 22: 831-847. Smallwood, K.S, and C.M. Schonewald. 1998. Study design and interpretation for mammalian carnivore density estimates. Oecologia 113:474-491. Zhang, M., S. Geng, and K.S. Smallwood. 1998. Nitrate contamination in groundwater of Tulare County, California. Ambio 27(3):170-174. Smallwood, K.S. and M.L. Morrison. 1997. Animal burrowing in the waste management zone of Hanford Nuclear Reservation. Proceedings of the Western Section of the Wildlife Society Meeting 33:88-97. Morrison, M.L., K.S. Smallwood, and J. Beyea. 1997. Monitoring the dispersal of contaminants by wildlife at nuclear weapons production and waste storage facilities. The Environmentalist 17:289-295. Smallwood, K.S. 1997. Interpreting puma (Puma concolor) density estimates for theory and management. Environmental Conservation 24(3):283-289. Smallwood, K.S. 1997. Managing vertebrates in cover crops: a first study. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 11:155-160. Smallwood, K.S. and S. Geng. 1997. Multi-scale influences of gophers on alfalfa yield and quality. Field Crops Research 49:159-168. Smallwood, K.S. and C. Schonewald. 1996. Scaling population density and spatial pattern for terrestrial, mammalian carnivores. Oecologia 105:329-335. Smallwood CV 10 Smallwood, K.S., G. Jones, and C. Schonewald. 1996. Spatial scaling of allometry for terrestrial, mammalian carnivores. Oecologia 107:588-594. Van Vuren, D. and K.S. Smallwood. 1996. Ecological management of vertebrate pests in agricultural systems. Biological Agriculture and Horticulture 13:41-64. Smallwood, K.S., B.J. Nakamoto, and S. Geng. 1996. Association analysis of raptors on an agricultural landscape. Pages 177-190 in D.M. Bird, D.E. Varland, and J.J. Negro, ers., Raptors in human landscapes. Academic Press, London. Erichsen, A.L., K.S. Smallwood, A.M. Commandatore, D.M. Fry, and B. Wilson. 1996. White-tailed Kite movement and nesting patterns in an agricultural landscape. Pages 166-176 in D.M. Bird, D.E. Varland, and J.J. Negro, eds., Raptors in human landscapes. Academic Press, London. Smallwood, K.S. 1995. Scaling Swainsoffs hawk population density for assessing habitat-use across an agricultural landscape. J. Raptor Reseamh 29:172-178. Smallwood, K.S. and W.A. Erickson. 1995. Estimating gopher populations and their abatement in forest plantations. Forest Science 41:284-296. Smallwood, K.S. and E.L. Fitzhugh. 1995. A track count for estimating mountain lion Felis concolor californica population trend. Biological Conservation 71:251-259 Smallwood, K.S. 1994. Site invasibility by exotic birds and mammals. Biological Conservation 69:25i- 259. Smallwood, K.S. 1994. Trends in California mountain lion populations. Southwestern Naturalist 39:67-72. Smallwood, K.S. 1993. Understanding ecological pattern and process by association and order. Acta Oecologica 14(3):443--462. Smallwood, K.S. and E.L. Fitzhugh. 1993. A rigorous technique for identifying individual mountain lions Felis concolor by their tracks. Biological Conservation 65:51-59. Smallwood, K.S. 1993. Mountain lion vocalizations and hunting behavior. The Southwestern Naturalist 38:65-67. Smallwood, K.S. and T.P. Salmon. 1992. A rating system for potential exotic vertebrate pests. Biological Conservation 62:149-159. Smallwood, K.S. 1990. Turbulence and the ecology of invading species. Ph.D. Thesis, University of California, Davis. Peer-reviewed Reports Smallwood, K. S. and C. Thelander. 2004. Developing methods to reduce bird mortality in the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Ama. Final Report to the California Energy Commission, Public Interest Energy Reseamh - Environmental Area, Contract No. 500-01-019. Sacramento, California. 531 pp. Smallwood, K. S. and C. Tbelander. 2004. Bird mortality at the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area, March 1998 - September 2001 Final Report. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado. Draft submitted for review. Smallwood CV 11 Thelander, C.G.S. Smallwood, and L. Rugge. 2003. Bird risk behaviors and fatalities at the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area. Period of Performance: March 1998--December 2000. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, NREL/SR-500-33829. U.S. Department of Commerce, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia. Thelander, C.G.S. Smallwood, and L. Rugge. 2001. Bird risk behaviors and fatalities at the Altamont Wind Resource Area - a progress report. Proceedings of the American Wind Energy Association, Washington D.C. 16 pp. Non-Peer Reviewed Publications Jennifer Davidson and Shawn Smallwood. 2004. Laying plans for a hydrogen highway. Comstock's Business, August 2004:18-20, 22, 24-26. Jennifer Davidson and Shawn Smallwood. 2004. Refined conundrum: California consumers demand more oil while opposing refinery development. Comstock's Business, November 2004:26-27, 29-30. Smallwood, K.S. 2002. Review of"The Atlas of Endangered Species." By Richard Mackay. Environmental Conservation 30:210-211. Thelander, C.G. and S. Smallwood. 2002. The Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area's Effects on Birds: A Case History. Manuela de Lucas, Guyonne Janss, and Miguel Ferrer, eds. Birds and wind power. In press. Smallwood, K.S. 2002. Review of"The Endangered Species Act. History, Conservation, and Public Policy." By Brian Czech And Paul B. Krausman. Environmental Conservation 29: 269-270. Smallwood, K.S. 1997. Spatial scaling of pocket gopher (Geomyidae) burrow volume. Abstract in Proceedings of 44th Annual Meeting, Southwestern Association of Naturalists. Department of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville. Smallwood, K.S. 1997. Estimating prairie dog and pocket gopher burrow volume. Abstract in Proceedings of 44th Annual Meeting, Southwestern Association of Naturalists. Department of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville. Smallwood, K.S. 1997. Animal burrowing parameters influencing toxic waste management. Abstract in Proceedings of Meeting, Western Section of the Wildlife Society. Smallwood, K.S, and Bruce Wilcox. 1996. Study and interpretive design effects on mountain lion density estimates. Abstract, page 93 in D.W. Padley, ed., Proceedings 5th Mountain Lion Workshop, Southern California Chapter, The Wildlife Society. 135 pp. Smallwood, K.S, and Bruce Wilcox. 1996. Ten years of mountain lion track survey. Page 94 in D.W. Padley, ed. Abstract, page 94 in D.W. Padley, ed., Proceedings 5th Mountain Lion Workshop, Southern California Chapter, The Wildlife Society. 135 pp. Smallwood, K.S, and M. Grigione. 1997. Photographic recording of mountain lion tracks. Pages 75-75 in D.W. Padley, ed., Proceedings 5th Mountain Lion Workshop, Southern California Chapter, The Wildlife Society. 135 pp. Smallwood CV 12 Smallwood, K.S., B. Wilcox, and J. Kan'. 1995. An approach to scaling fragmentation effects. Brief 8, Ecosystem Indicators Working Group, 17 March, 1995. Institute for Sustainable Development, Thoreau Center for Sustainability - The Presidio, PO Box 29075, San Francisco, CA 94129-0075. Wilcox, B., and K.S. Smallwood. 1995. Ecosystem indicators model overview. Brief2, Ecosystem Indicators Working Group, 17 March, 1995. Institute for Sustainable Development, Thoreau Center for Sustainability - The Presidio, PO Box 29075, San Francisco, CA 94129-0075. EIP Associates. 1996. Yolo County Habitat Conservation Plan. Yolo County Planning and Development Department, Woodland, California. Geng, S., K.S. Smallwood, and M. Zhang. 1995. Sustainable agriculture and agricultural sustainability. Proc. 7th International Congress SABRAO, 2nd industrial Symp. WSAA. Taipei, Taiwan. Smallwood, K.S. and S. Geng. 1994. Landscape strategies for biological control and IPM. Pages 454464 in W. Dehai, ed., Proc. International Conference on Integrated Resource Management for Sustainable Agriculture. Beijing Agricultural University, Beijing, China. Smallwood, K.S. and S. Geng. 1993. Alfalfa as wildlife habitat. California Alfalfa Symposium 23:105-8. Smallwood, K.S. and S. Geng. 1993. Management of pocket gophers in Sacramento Valley alfalfa. California Alfalfa Symposium 23:86-89. Smallwood, K.S. and E.L. Fitzhugh. 1992. The use of track counts for mountain lion population census. Pages 59-67 in C. Braun, ed. Mountain lion-Human Interaction Symposium and Workshop. Colorado Division of Wildlife, Fort Collins. Smallwood, K.S. and E.L. Fitzhugh. 1989. Differentiating mountain-lion and dog tracks. Pages 58-63 in Smith, R.H., ed. Proc. Third Mountain Lion Workshop. Arizona Game and Fish Department, Phoenix. Fitzhugh, E.L. and K.S. Smallwood. 1989. Techniques for monitoring mountain lion population levels. Pages 69-71 in Smith, R.H., ed. Proc. Third Mountain Lion Workshop. Arizona Game and Fish Department, Phoenix. Reports Smallwood, K. S., and L. Neher. 2005. Repowering the APWRA: Forecasting and minimizing avian mortality without significant loss of power generation. California Energy Commission report: In press. Morrison, M. L., and K. S. Smallwood. 2004. Kangaroo rat survey at RMA4, NAS Lemoore. Report to U.S. Navy. 4 pp. Smallwood, K. S., and M. L. Morrison. 2003. 2003 Progress Report: San Joaquin kangaroo rat (Dipodomys nitratoides)'Conservation Research at Resources Management Area 5, Lemoore Naval Air Station. Progress report to U.S. Department of the Navy, Lemoore, California. 56 pp. + 58 figures. Smallwood, K. S. 2003. Comparison of Biological Impacts of the No Project and Partial Underground Alternatives presented in the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Jefferson-Martin 230 kV Transmission Line. Report to California Public Utilities Commission. 20 pp. Morrison, M. L., and K. S. Smallwood. 2003. Kangaroo rat survey at RMA4, NAS Lemoore. Report to U.S. Navy. 6 pp. + 7 photos + I map. Smallwood CV 13 Smallwood, K. S. 2003. Assessment of the Environmental Review Documents Prepared for the Tesla Power Project. Report to the California Energy Commission on behalf of Californians for Renewable Energy. 32 pp. Smallwood, K. S., and M. L. Morrison. 2003. 2002 Progress Report: San Joaquin kangaroo rat (Dipodomys nitratoides) Conservation Research at Resources Management Area 5, Lemoore Naval Air Station. Progress report to U.S. Department of the Navy, Lemoore, California. 45 pp. + 36 figures. Smallwood, K. S., Michael L. Morrison and Carl G. Thelander 2002. Study plan to test the effectiveness of aerial markers at reducing avian mortality due to collisions with transmission lines: A report to Pacific Gas & Electric Company. 10 pp. Smallwood, K. S. 2002. Assessment of the Environmental Review Documents Prepared for the East Altamont Energy Center. Report to the California Energy Commission on behalf of Californians for Renewable Energy. 26 pp. Thelander, Carl G., K. Shawn Smallwood, and Christopher Costello. 2002 Rating Distribution Poles for Threat of Raptor Electrocution and Priority Retrofit: Developing a Predictive Model. Report to Southern California Edison Company. 30 pp. Smallwood, K. S., M. Robison, and C. Thelander. 2002. Draft Natural Environment Study, Prunedale Highway 101 Project. California Department of Transportation, San Luis Obispo, California. 120 pp. Smallwood, K.S. 2001. Assessment of ecological integrity and restoration potential of Beeman/Pelican Farm. Draft Report to Howard Beeman, Woodland, California. 14 pp. Smallwood, K. S., and M. L. Morrison. 2002. Fresno kangaroo rat (Dipodomys nitratoides) Conservation Research at Resources Management Area 5, Lemoore Naval Air Station. Progress report to U.S. Department of the Navy, Lemoore, California. 29 pp. + 19 figures. Smallwood, K.S. 2001. Rocky Flats visit, April 4tn through 6~, 2001. Report to Berger & Montaque, P.C. 16 pp. with 61 color plates. Smallwood, K.S. 2001. Affidavit of K. Shawn Smallwood, Ph.D. in the matter of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's rejection of Seatuck Environmental Association's proposal to operate an education center on Seatuck National Wildlife Refuge. Submitted to Seatuck Environmental Association in two parts, totaling 7 pp. Magney, D., and K.S. Smallwood. 2001. Maranatha High School CEQA critique. Comment letter submitted to Tamara & Efren Compefin, 16 pp. Smallwood, K.S. 2001. Preliminary Comments on the Proposed Blythe Energy Project. Submitted to California Energy Commission on March 15 on behalf of Californians for Renewable Energy (CARE). 14 pp. Smallwood, K. S. and D. Mangey. 2001. Comments on the Newhall Ranch November 2000 Administrative Draft EIR. Prepared for Ventura County Counsel regarding the Newhall Ranch Specific Plan EIR. 68 pp. Smallwood CV 14 Magney, D. and K. S. Smallwood. 2000. Newhall Ranch Notice of Preparation Submittal. Prepared for Ventura County Counsel regarding our recommended scope of work for the Newhall Ranch Specific Plan EIR. 17 pp. Smallwood, K. S. 2000. Comments on the Preliminary Staff Assessment of the Contra Costa Power Plant Unit 8 Project. Submitted to California Energy Commission on November 30 on behalf of Californians for Renewable Energy (CARE). 4 pp. Smallwood, K. S. 2000. Comments on the California Energy Commission's Final Staff Assessment of the MEC. Submitted to California Energy Commission on October 29 on behalf of Californians for Renewable Energy (CARE). 8 pp. Smallwood, K. S. 2000. Comments on the Biological Resources Mitigation Implementation and Monitoring Plan (BRMIMP). Submitted to California Energy Commission on October 29 on behalf of Californians for Renewable Energy (CARE). 9 pp. Smallwood, K. S. 2000. Comments on the Preliminary Staff Assessment of the Metcalf Energy Center. Submitted to California Energy Commission on behalf of Californians for Renewable Energy (CARE). 11 pp. Smallwood, K. S. 2000. Preliminary report of reconnaissance surveys near the TRW plant south of Phoenix, Arizona, March 27-29. Report prepared for Hagens, Berman & Mitchell, Attorneys at Law, Phoenix, AZ. 6pp. Morrison, M.L., K.S..Smallwood, and M. Robison. 2001. Draft Natural Environment Study for Highway 46 compliance with CEQA/NEPA. Report to the California Department of Transportation. 75 pp. Morrison, M.L., and K.S..Smallwood. 1999. NTI plan evaluation and comments. Exhibit C in W.D. Carrier, M.L. Morrison, K.S. Smallwood, and Vail Engineering. Recommendations for NBHCP land acquisition and enhancement strategies. Northern Territories, Inc., Sacramento. Smallwood, K. S. 1999. Estimation of impacts due to dredging of a shipping channel through Humboldt Bay, California. Court Declaration prepared on behalf of EPIC. Smallwood, K. S. 1998. 1998 California Mountain Lion Track Count. Report to the Defenders of Wildlife, Washington, D.C. 5 pages. Smallwood, K.S. 1998. Draft report of a visit to a paint sludge dump site near Ridgewood, New Jersey, February 26th, 1998. Unpublished report to Consulting in the Public Interest. Slnallwood, K.S. 1997. Science missing in the "no surprises" policy. Commissioned by National Endangered Species Network and Spirit of the Sage Council, Pasadena, California. Smallwood, K.S. and M.L. Morrison. 1997. Alternate mitigation strategy for incidental take of giant garter snake and Swainson's hawk as part of the Natomas Basin Habitat Conservation Plan. Pages 6-9 and iii illustrations in W.D. Carrier, K.S. Smallwood and M.L. Morrison, Natomas Basin Habitat Conservation Plan: Narrow channel marsh alternative wetland mitigation. Northern Territories, Inc., Sacramento. Smallwood, K.S. 1996. Assessment of the BIOPORT model's parameter values for pocket gopher burrowing characteristics. Report to Berger & Montague, P.C. and Roy S. Haber, P.C., Philadelphia. (peer reviewed). Smallwood CV 15 Smallwood, K.S. 1997. Assessment of plutonium releases from Hanford buried waste sites. Report Number 9, Consulting in the Public Interest, 53 Clinton Street, Lambertville, New Jersey, 08530. Smallwood, K.S. 1996. Soil Bioturbation and Wind Affect Fate of Hazardous Materials that were Released at the Rocky Flats Plant, Colorado. Report to Berger & Montague, P.C., Philadelphia. Smallwood, K.S. 1996. Second assessment of the BIOPORT model's parameter values for pocket gopher burrowing characteristics and other relevant wildlife observations. Report to Berger & Montague, P.C. and Roy S. Haber, P.C., Philadelphia. Smallwood, K.S., and R. Leidy. 1996. Wildlife and Their Management Under the Martell SYP. Report to Georgia Pacific, Corporation, Martel, CA. 30 pp. EIP Associates. 1995. Yolo County Habitat Conservation Plan Biological Resources Report. Yolo County Planning and Development Department, Woodland, California. Smallwood, K.S. and S. Geng. 1995. Analysis of the 1987 California Farm Cost Survey and recommendations for future survey. Program on Workable Energy Regulation, University-wide Energy Research Group, University of California. Fitzhugh, E.L. and K.S. Smallwood. 1987. Methods Manual - A statewide mountain lion population index technique. California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento. Salmon, T.P. and K.S. Smallwood. 1989: Final Report - Evaluating exotic vertebrates as pests to California agriculture. California Department of Food and Agriculture, Sacramento. Smallwood, K.S. and W. A. Erickson (written under supervision of W.E. Howard, R.E. Marsh, and R.J. Laacke). 1990. Environmental exposure and fate of multi-kill strychnine gopher baits. Final Report to USDA Forest Service -NAPIAP, Cooperative Agreement PSW-89-0010CA. Fitzhugh, E.L., K.S. Smallwood, and R. Gross. 1985. Mountain lion track count, Marin County, 1985. Unpublished report on file at Wildlife Extension, University of California, Davis. Comments on Environmental Documents I was retained or commissioned to comment on environmental planning and review documents, including: · Buena Vista Wind Energy Project Notice of Preparation of EIR (2004; 15 pp); · Negative Declaration of the proposed Winters Highlands Subdivision (2004; 9 pp); · Negative Declaration of the proposed Winters Highlands Subdivision (2004; 13 pp); · Negative Declaration of the proposed Creekside Highlands Project, Tract 7270 (2004; 21 pp); · Conditional Use Permit renewals from Alameda County for wind turbine operations in the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area (2003; 41 pp); · UC Davis Long Range Development Plan of 2003, particularly with regard to the Neighborhood Master Plan (2003; 23 pp); · Anderson Marketplace Draft Environmental Impact Report (2003:18 pp + 3 plates of photos); · Negative Declaration of the proposed expansion of Temple B'nai Tikyah (2003:6 pp); · Antonio Mountain Ranch Specific Plan Public Draft EIR (2002:23 pp); · Response to testimony of experts at the East Altamont Energy Center evidentiary hearing on biological resources (2002:9 pp); Smallwood CV 16 · Revised Draft Environmental Impact Report, The Promenade (2002:7 pp); · Recirculated Initial Study for Calpine's proposed Pajaro Valley Energy Center (2002:3 pp); · UC Merced -- Declaration of Dr. Shawn Smallwood in support of petitioner's application for temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction (2002:5 pp); · Replies to response to comments in Final Environmental Impact Report, Atwood Ranch Unit II1 Subdivision (2003:22 pp); · Draft Environmental Impact Report, Atwood Ranch Unit III Subdivision (2002:19 pp + 8 photos on 4 plates); · California Energy Commission Staff Report on GWF Tracy Peaker Project (2002:17 pp + 3 photos; follow-up report of 3 pp); · Initial Study and Negative Declaration, Silver Bend Apartments, Placer County (2002:13 pp); · UC Merced Long-range Development Plan DEIR and UC Merced Community Plan DEIR (2001:26 PP); · Initial Study, Colusa County Power Plant (2001:6 pp); · Comments on Proposed Dog Park at Catlin Park, Folsom, California (2001:5 pp + 4 photos); · Pacific Lumber Co. (Headwaters) Habitat Conservation Plan and Environmental Impact Report (1998:28 pp); · Final Environmental Impact ReporffStatement for Issuance of Take authorization for listed species within the MSCP planning area in San Diego County, California (Fed. Reg. 62 (60): 14938, San Diego Multi-Species Conservation Program) (1997:10 pp); · Permit (PRT-823773) Amendment for the Natomas Basin Habitat Conservation Plan, Sacramento, CA (Fed. Reg. 63 (101): 29020-29021) (1998); · Draft Recovery Plan for the Giant Garter Snake (Thamnophis gigas). (Fed. Reg. 64(176): 49497- 49498) (1999:8 pp); * Review of the Draft Recovery Plan for the Arroyo Southwestern Toad (Bufo microscaphus californicus) ( 1998); · Ballona West Bluffs Project Environmental Impact Report (1999: oral presentation); · California Board of Forestry's proposed amended Forest Practices Rules ( 1999); · Negative Declaration for the Sunset Skyranch Airport Use Permit (1999); · Calpine and Bechtel Corporations' Biological Resources Implementation and Monitoring Program (BRMIMP) for the Metcalf Energy Center (2000:10 pp); · California Energy Commission's Final Staff Assessment of the proposed Metcalf Energy Center (20OO); · US Fish and Wildlife Service Section 7 consultation with the California Energy Commission regarding Calpine and Bechtel Corporations' Metcalf Energy Center (2000:4 pp); · California Energy Commission's Preliminary Staff Assessment of the proposed Metcalf Energy Center (2000:11 pp); · Site-specific management plans for the Natomas Basin Conservancy's mitigation lands, prepared by Wildlands, Inc. (2000:7 pp); · Affidavit of K. Shawn Smallwood in Spirit of the Sage Council, et al. (Plaintiffs) vs. Bruce Babbitt, Secretary, U.S. Department of the Interior, et al. (Defendants), Injuries caused by the No Surprises policy and final rule which codifies that policy (1999:9 pp). I also issued formal comments on the following documents: · Bureau of Land Management Wind Energy Programmatic EIS Scoping document (2003:7 pp.); · N-EPA Environmental Analysis for Biosafety Level 4 National Biocontainment Laboratory (NBL) at UC Davis (2003:7 pp); Smallwood CV 17 · Notice of Preparation of UC Merced Community and Area Plan EIR, on behalf of The Wildlife Society--Western Section (2001:8 pp.); · Preliminary Draft Yolo County Habitat Conservation Plan (2001; 2 letters totaling 35 pp.); · Merced County General Plan Revision, notice of Negative Declaration (2001:2 pp.); · Notice of Preparation of Campus Parkway EIR/EIS (2001:7 pp.); · Draft Recovery Plan for the bighorn sheep in the Peninsular Range (Ovis candensis) (2000); · Draft Recovery Plan for the California Red-legged Frog (Rana aurora draytonii), on behalf of The Wildlife Society~Westem Section (2000:10 pp.); · Sierra Nevada Forest Plan Amendment Draft Environmental Impact Statement, on behalf of The Wildlife Society---Western Section (2000:7 pp.); · State Water Project Supplemental. Water Purchase Program, Draft Program EIR (1997); · Davis General Plan Update EIR (2000); · Covell Center Project E1R and EIR Supplement (1997); · Turn of the Century EIR (1999:10 pp); · Proposed termination of Critical Habitat Designation under the Endangered Species Act (Fed. Reg. 64(113): 31871-31874) (1999); · NOA Draft Addendum to the Final Handbook for Habitat Conservation Planning and Incidental Take Permitting Process, termed the HCP 5-Point Policy Plan (Fed. Reg. 64(45): 11485 - 11490) (1999). Position Statements I prepared the following position statements: · Recommended that the California Department of Fish and Game prioritize the extermination of the introduced southern water snake in northern California. The Wildlife Society--Western Section (2001); · Recommended that The Wildlife Society~Western Section appoint or recommend members of the independent scientific review panel for the UC Merced environmental review process (2001); · Opposed the siting of the University of California's 10th campus on a sensitive vernal pool/grassland complex east of Merced. The Wildlife Society--Western Section (2000); · Opposed the legalization of ferret ownership in California. The Wildlife Society--Western Section (2000); · Opposed the Proposed "No Surprises," "Safe Harbor," and "Candidate Conservation Agreement" rules, including permit-shield protection provisions (Fed. Reg. Vol. 62, No. 103, pp. 29091-29098 and No. 113, pp. 32189-32194). This statement was signed by 188 scientists and went to the responsible federal agencies, as well as to the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives. Printed Mass Media Smallwood, K.S., D. Mooney, and M. McGuinness. 2003. We must stop the UCD biolab now. Op-Ed to the Davis Enterprise. Smatlwood, K.S. 2002. Spring Lake threatens Davis. Op-Ed to the Davis Enterprise. Smallwood, K.S. Summer, 2001. Mitigation of habitation. The Flatlander, Davis, California. Entrikan, R.K. and K.S. Smallwood. 2000. Measure O: Flawed law would lock in new taxes. Op-Ed to the Davis Enterprise. Smallwood CV 18 Smallwood, K.S. 2000. Davis delegation lobbies Congress for Wildlife conservation. Op-Ed to the Davis Enterprise. Smallwood, K.S. 1998. Davis Visions. The Flatlander, Davis, California. Smallwood, K.S. 1997. Last grab for Yolo's land and water. The Flatlander, Davis, California. Smallwood, K.S. 1997. The Yolo County HCP. Op-Ed to the Davis Enterprise. Radio/Television KDVS Speaking in Tongues (host Ron Glick), Yolo County HCP: 1 hour. December 27, 2001; KDVS Speaking in Tongues (host Ron Glick), Yolo County HCP: 1 hour. May 3, 2001; KDVS Speaking in Tongues (host Ron Glick), Yolo County HCP: 1 hour. February 8, 2001; KDVS Speaking in Tongues (host Ron Glick & Shawn Smallwood), California Energy Crisis: I hour. Jan. 25, 2001; KDVS Speaking in Tongues (host Ron Glick), Headwaters Forest HCP: I hour. 1998; Davis Cable Channel (host Gerald Heffernon), Burrowing owls in Davis: half hour. June, 2000; Davis Cable Channel (hosted by Davis League of Women Voters), Measure O debate: I hour. October, 2000; KXTV 10, In Your Interest, The Endangered Species Act: half hour. 1997. Posters at P~'ofessional Meetings Smallwood, K. S., C. G. Thelander and L. Spiegel. 2003. Toward a predictive model of avian fatalities in the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area. Windpower 2003 Conference and Convention, Austin, Texas. Smallwood, K.S. and Eva Butler. 2002. Pocket Gopher Response to Yellow Star-thistle Eradication as part of Grassland Restoration at Decommissioned Mather Air Force Base, Sacramento County, California. White Mountain Research Station Open House, Barcroft Station. Smallwood, K.S. and Michael L. Morrison. 2002. Fresno kangaroo rat (Dipodornys nitratoides) Conservation Research at Resources Management Area 5, Lemoore Naval Air Station. White Mountain Research Station Open House, Barcroft Station. Smallwood, K.S. and E.L. Fitzhugh. 1989. Differentiating mountain lion and dog tracks. Third Mountain Lion Workshop, Prescott, AZ. Smith, T. R. and K. S. Smallwood. 2000. Effects of study area size, location, season, and allometry on reported Sorex shrew densities. Annual Meeting of the Western Section of The Wildlife Society. Presentations at Professional Meetings and Seminars: Minimizing avian mortality in the Altamont Pass Wind Resources Area. UC Davis Wind Energy Collaborative Forum, Palm Springs, California, December 14, 2004. Smallwood CV 19 Selecting electric distribution poles for priority retrofitting to reduce raptor mortality. Raptor Research Foundation Meeting, Bakersfield, California, November 10, 2004. Lessons learned from five years of avian mortality research at the Altamont Pass Wind Resources Area in California. The Wildlife Society Annual Meeting, Calgary, Canada, September 2004. The ecology and impacts of power generation at Altamont Pass. Sacramento Petroleum Association, Sacramento, California, August 18, 2004. Burrowing owl mortality in the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area. California Burrowing Owl Consortium meeting, Hayward, California, February 7, 2004. Burrowing owl mortality in the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area. California Burrowing Owl Symposium, Sacramento, November 2, 2003. Raptor Mortality at the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area. National Wind Coordinating Committee, Washington, D.C., November 17, 2003. Raptor Behavior at the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area. Annual Meeting of the Raptor Research Foundation, Anchorage, Alaska, September, 2003. Raptor Mortality at the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area. Annual Meeting of the Raptor Research Foundation, Anchorage, Alaska, September, 2003. California mountain lions. Ecological & Environmental Issues Seminar, Department of Biology, California State University, Sacramento, November, 2000. Using a Geographic Positioning System (GPS) to map wildlife and habitat. Annual Meeting of the Western Section of The Wildlife Society, Riverside, CA, January, 2000. Suggested standards for science applied to conservation issues. Annual Meeting of the Western Section of The Wildlife Society, Riverside, CA, January, 2000. The indicators framework applied to ecological restoration in Yolo County, California. Society for Ecological Restoration, September 25, 1999. Ecological restoration in the context of animal social units and their habitat areas. Society for Ecological Restoration, September 24, 1999. Relating Indicators of Ecological Health and Integrity to Assess Risks to Sustainable Agriculture and Native Biota. International Conference on Ecosystem Health, August 16, 1999. A crosswalk from the Endangered Species Act to the HCP Handbook and real HCPs. Southern California Edison, Co. and California Energy Commission, March 4-5, 1999. Mountain lion track counts in California: Implications for Management. Ecological & Environmental Issues Seminar, Department of Biological Sciences, California State University, Sacramento, November 4, 1998. "No Surprises" -- Lack of science in the HCP process. California Native Plant Society Annual Conservation Conference, The Presidio, San Francisco, September 7, 1997. Smallwood CV 20 In Your Interest. A half hour weekly show aired on Channel 10 Television, Sacramento. In this episode, 1 served on a panel of experts discussing problems with the implementation of the Endangered Species Act. Aired August 31, 1997. Spatial scaling of pocket gopher (Geomyidae) density. Southwestern Association of Naturalists 44th Meeting, Fayetteville, Arkansas, April 10, 1997. Estimating prairie dog and pocket gopher burrow volume. Southwestern Association of Naturalists 44th Meeting, Fayetteville, Arkansas, April 10, 1997. Ten years of mountain lion track survey. Fifth Mountain Lion Workshop, San Diego, February 27, 1996. Study and interpretive design effects on mountain lion density estimates. Fifth Mountain Lion Workshop, San Diego, February 27, 1996. Small animal control. Session moderator and speaker at the California Farm Conference, Sacramento, California, Feb. 28, 1995. Small animal control. Ecological Farming Conference, Asylomar, California, Jan. 28, 1995. Habitat associations ofthe Swainson's Hawkin the Sacramento Valley's agricultural landscape. 1994 Raptor Research Foundation Meeting, Flagstaff, Arizona. Alfalfa as wildlife habitat. Seed Industry Conference, Woodland, California, May 4, 1994. Habitats and vertebrate pests: impacts and management. Managing Farmland to Bring Back Game Birds and Wildlife to the Central Valley. Yolo County Resource Conservation District, U.C. Davis, February 19, 1994. Management of gophers and alfalfa as wildlife habitat. Orland Alfalfa Production Meeting and Sacramento Valley Alfalfa Production Meeting, February I and 2, 1994. Patterns of wildlife movement in a farming landscape. Wildlife and Fisheries Biology Seminar Series: Recent Advances in Wildlife, Fish, and Conservation Biology, U.C. Davis, Dec. 6, 1993. Alfalfa as wildlife habitat. California Alfalfa Symposium, Fresno, California, Dec. 9, 1993. Management of pocket gophers in Sacramento Va!ley alfalfa. California Alfalfa Symposium, Fresno, California, Dec. 8, 1993. Association analysis of raptors in a farming landscape. Plenary speaker at Raptor Research Foundation Meeting, Charlotte, North Carolina, Nov. 6, 1993. Landscape strategies for biological control and IPM Plenary speaker, International Conference on Integrated Resource Management and Sustainable Agriculture, Beijing, China, Sept. 1 l, 1993. Landscape Ecology Study of Pocket Gophers in Alfalfa. Alfalfa Field Day, U.C. Davis, July 1993. Patterns of wildlife movement in a farming landscape. Spatial Data Analysis Colloquium, U.C. Davis, August 6, 1993. Smallwood CV 21 Sound stewardship of wildlife. Veterinary Medicine Seminar: Ethics of Animal Use, U.C. Davis. May 1993. Landscape ecology study of pocket gophers in alfalfa. Five County Grower's Meeting, Tracy, California. February 1993. Turbulence and the community organizers: The role of invading species in ordering a turbulent system, and the factors for invasion success. Ecology Graduate Student Association Colloquium, U.C. Davis. May 1990. Evaluation of exotic vertebrate pests. Fourteenth Vertebrate Pest Conference, Sacramento, California. March 1990. Analytical methods for predicting success of mammal introductions to North America. The Western Section of the Wildlife Society, Hilo, Hawaii. February 1988. A state-wide mountain lion track survey. Sacramento County Dept Parks and Recreation. April 1986. The mountain lion in California. Davis Chapter of the Audubon Society. October 1985. Ecology Graduate Student Seminars, U.C. Davis, 1985-1990: Social behavior of the mountain lion; Mountain lion control; Political status of the mountain lion in California. Other forms of Participation at Professional Meetings · Chair of Animal Damage Management Session, The Wildlife Society, Annual Meeting, Reno, Nevada, September 26, 2001. · Chair of Technical Session: Human communities and ecosystem health: Comparing perspectives and making connection. Managing for Ecosystem Health, International Congress on Ecosystem Health, Sacramento, CA August 15-20, 1999. · Student Awards Committee, Annual Meeting of the Western Section of The Wildlife Society, Riverside, CA, January, 2000. · Student Mentor, Annual Meeting of the Western Section of The Wildlife Society, Riverside, CA, January, 2000. Reviews of Journal Papers (Number of papers I reviewed for each journal) Papers Papers Journal reviewed Journal reviewed American Naturalist 1 Journal of Animal Ecology 1 Auk 1 Journal of Raptor Research 1 Biological Conservation >31 National Renewable Energy Lab reports 4 Canadian Journal of Zoology 1 Oikos 1 Ecosystem Health 1 The Prairie Naturalist 1 Environmental Conservation 3 Restoration Ecology 1 Environmental Management 15 Southwestern Naturalist 1 Functional Ecology I The Wildlife Society--Western Section Trans. 3 Journal of Zoology (London) I Proc. Int. Congress on Managing for 1 Smallwood CV 22 Ecosystem Health Journal of Applied Ecology 1 Transactions in GIS 1 Total in m~' records maintained since 1997 67 Committees Ph.D. Thesis Committee, Steve Anderson, University of California, Davis. Board Member, Iron Mountain Conservancy Memberships in Professional Societies: The Wildlife Society Society for Ecological Restoration Association of Southwest Naturalists Raptor Research Foundation American Museum of Natural History Honors and Awards: Certificate of Appreciation, The Wildlife Society--Western Section, 2000, 2001 Fulbright Research Fellowship to Indonesia, 1987. Northern California Athletic Association Most Valuable Cross Country Runner, 1984. J.G. Boswell Full Academic Scholarship, 1981 (Paid expenses for undergraduate education). American Legion Award, Corcoran High School, 1981, and John Muir Junior High, 1977. CIF Section Champion, Cross Country in 1978 and Track & Field 2 mile run in 1981. National Junior Record, 20 kilometer run, 1982. National Age Group Record, 1500 meter run, 1978 Community Activities: Davis Little League Chief Umpire and Board member, 2004-2005. Davis Little League Safety Officer, 2004-2005. Davis Little League Certified Umpire, 2002-2004 Davis Little League Scorekeeper, 2002 Davis Visioning Group member Petitioner for Writ of Mandate under the California Environmental Quality Act against City of Woodland decision to approve the Spring Lake Specific Plan, 2002 Served on campaign committee for City Council candidate References: Professor-Emeritus K.E.F. Watt, Department of Zoology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616. Phone: (530) 752-1558 Dr. Jan Beyea, Consulting in the Public Interest, 53 Clinton Street, Lambertville, New Jersey, 08530. Phone: (609) 397-2370 email: jbeyea@cipi.com Dr. Christine Schonewald, Retired Research Scientist, Biological Resources Division, US Geological Survey, Department of Environmental Studies, University of California, Davis, CA 95616. Present address: 2916 Princeton Ct., Cameron Park, CA 95682-9278. Phone: (530)6764866 email: CGEMS@earthlink.net Smallwood CV 23 Dr. Bruce Wilcox, Professor and Chair, Division of Ecology and Health, University of Hawaii, John A. Burns School of Medicine, 1960 East-West Road, Biomedical Sciences Building C-105a, Honolulu, H1 96822-2319 Phone: (808)956-5770 email: bwilcox@hawaii.edu Dr. Michael Morrison, PO Box 816, Bishop, CA 93515. Phone: (775) 233-8630 email: res080cg@verizon.net Dr. Gene R. Trapp, Dept. of Biological Sciences, California State University, Sacramento, CA 95819-6077 Phone: (916) 278-6279 email: trappgr@csus.edu Professor Richard G. Coss, Professor of Psychology and member of the Graduate Groups in Ecology and Animal Behavior Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616. Phone: (530) 752-1626. Professor Shu Geng, Department of Agronomy and Range Science, University of California, Davis, CA 95616. Phone: (530) 752-6939 Email: sgeng@ucdavis.edu - ~"~'~'" 2 Park Plaza, Suite 700 ~' R. z/~ N '[ 1~ E Irvine, CA 92614 E Q U I T I E S 949.~50.9229 Fax 949.250.9231 January 10, 2005 Brad Buller Via Facsimile 909/477-2849 City Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-0807 Re: Open Space Transfer Plan-Henderson Creek Dear Mr. Buller: The purpose of this letter is to request that the City schedule a hearing no later than February 2, 2005, before the City Council to determine if The Habitat Trust for Wildlife, Inc. ("Habitat Trust"), will qualify to be the conservation entity for the Henderson Creek Project. As you know, Rancho 2004 has acquired the interest of Henderson Creek Properties, LLC., in the property that is the subject of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT 16324, and the related development approvals, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga ("City"). Condition BIO- 1 of Resolution No. 04-60, of the City's Planning Commission requires that the developer "transfer to the County of San Bernardino Special Districts OS- 1 or other qualified conservation entity approved by the City" off-site land for habitat preservation. It is our understanding that since October 2004, the City has been receiving information from the Habitat Trust about its ability to qualify as the conservation entity for the project. On January 10, 2005, we send the attached letter to the Habitat Trust, enclosing your January 6th letter and telling the Habitat Trust that we are asking the City to set a hearing on whether the Habitat Trust can serve as the conservation entity for the project. Please let us know as soon as possible when the hearing will be set. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Dorian Johnson M.~.~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Executive Vice President Granite Equities JAFt 1 3 200§ Fro s Jackson[ DeMarcol Peckenpaugh. I} A LAW CO R P O RAT I O N January 10, 2005 Direct Dial:949.851.742, ~ JAN .1 1 2005 ~1 Ernail: mtidu$@jdpl~ B[~Xll - ~ Reply to: Irvine Office F e No: 35829 VIA FACSIMILE & U.S. MAIL Craig A. Sherman, Esq. 1901 First Avenue, Suite 335 San Diego, CA 92101 Re: Open Space Transfer Plan-Henderson Creek Dear Mr. Sherman: We represent Granite Homes, the manager of Rancho 2004. Rancho 2004 l~as acquired the interest of Henderson Creek Properties, LLC., in the property that is the subject of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT 16324, and the related development approvals, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga ("City"). Condition BIO-1 of Resolution No. 04-60, of the City's Planning Commission requires that the developer "transfer tO the County of San Bemardino Special Districts OS-1 or other qualified conservation entity approved by the City" off-site land for habitat preservation. · It is our understanding that since October 2004, your client, The Habitat Trust for Wildlife, Inc. ("Habitat Trust"), has been sending information to the City to qualify as the conservation entity for the Henderson Creek Project. We received a letter dated January 6, 2005, from the City discussing Habitat Trust's submittals. A copy of the letter is attached. To satisfy Condition BIO-1, Rancho 2004 is asking the City to set a hearing to determine whether Habitat Trust can serve as the conservation entity for the Project We believe the hearing will be on February 2, 2005. Please review the City's January 6t~ letter to us and submit any additional information to the City and carbon copy us on the submittal, if any. We also learned that the Habitat Trust filed a lawsuit against, among others, Rancho 2004 on January 5, 2005, concerning this same issue. Our client has agreed to let us accept service of process on the complaint for Rancho, 2004, and the three Granite entities. Despite the lawsuit, Rancho 2004 will continue to process the Habitat Trust's application to the City, unless you instruct us, in writing, not to do so. Irvine Office Westlake Village Office 2030 Main Street, Suite 1200 2815 Townsgate Road, Suite 200 www.jdplaw.com ~"~0 / Irvine, California 92614 Westlake Village, California 91361 t:949.752.8585 f:949~752.0597 t:805.230.0023 f:805.230.0087 / Craig A. Sherman, Esq. January 10, 2005 Page 2 If you have any questions, please give us a call. Very truly yours, Michael L Tidus MLT/jlc Enclosue 561477.1 Craig A. Sherman, Esq. January 10, 2005 Page 3 bcc:. Dan Kassel* / Dorian Johnson* Benjamin T. Benumof, Esq. (w/encl.) * via fax and U.S. Mail (w/encl.) ]V[a).or P~Tem ~, DENNIS ~{ICI'L~EL SAM SPAGNOLO THE CI~ OF ~CHO CUC~ON~ J~c~ L~M, AICP CUGAMONOA ~anua~ ~, 2005 Dorian Johnson Executive Vice President Granite Homes 2 Park Plaza, Suite 700 Irvine, CA 92614 SUBJECT: OPEN SPACE TRANSFER PLAN SUBMITTAL Dear Dorian Johnson: This letter is to acknowledge the multiple submittals received by this Department for materials requested in my previous letter dated October 7, 2004. Before proceeding to the City Council for a determination on the qualifications of the Habitat Trust, I wanted to 'make sure the information is complete and to clarify an), questions on the material that has been submitted to date. In addition I would like to receive a written request from you to proceed to the City Council for'a final determination. Please review the following items and respond as needed (these are the items requested in our October 7, 2004 letter with a comment in italics after.each): 1. The Trust's Incorporation Papers. Received November 15, 2004. 2. The Trust's Board of Director's meeting minutes for the action approving the acceptance ofthe open space mitigation land. Received November 24, 2004. 3. The Trust's Bylaws. Received November 75, 2004. 4. The most recent auditor's report for .the Trust~ Report received was for the Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs (SEE) as of December 31,2002. It does not clearly reflect that the information is for the Habitat Trust's financial records and that they are in compliance with annual audit requirements. Received November 24, 2004. 5. A copy of the Habitat Resource Management:. Plan : (or similar property management document) with 'all related habitat studies for the nearest site currently owned by the Trust. Received November 24, 2004 (appears to be unsigned draft of a Document called, "The Habitat Trust for Wildlife Nature Sanctuaries Management Plan Cucamong(n)a, {sic} North Etiwanda, West Valley Foothills Area 2003-2004." The submitted document acknowledges it was, "... adapted from the North Etiwanda Habitat Preserve Management Plan, 2001 USFWS, CDFG, San Be£nardino County Open Space D/strict I." The submitted document is incomplete with blank spaces and no map exhibits attached as referenced. 0500 CMc Center Dr. · EO. Bo:( 887 ' Kancho Cucamong;, ('.'A 91729-f~807 - 'IZI 909-477-2700 ' Fax 90)-477-.8 ~ t) . ,~'ww.ci.rancho-cucamon.a. s OPEN SPACE TRANSFER PLAN SUBMI'I-rAL DORIAN JOHNSON - GRANITE HOMES January 6, 2005 Page 2 6. A list of all Board Members of the Trust. Mr.. Sherman's letter dated November ~5, 2004 (Received November 24, 20~4)' indicates thaf currently there are o~ly three Board Members. We note that none of the Board, are from the local area. 7. A list of the Trust Office Iocations:' This infornCation has not been pr°vialed. 8. A list of personnel who would be involved with management of the Open Space Transfer Plan, including their qualifications and experience. This information is still outstanding according to the Hogle Ireland transmittal sheet received November 24, 2004.. We did · receive via e-mail .on January 5, 2004 a resume for Kenneth Shawn Smallwood, a consulting ecologist. Should' we assume that based On Mr, Sherman's previous correspondence they use volunteers to accomplish qualified biological studies .and analysis for on going management responsibilities? 9. A proposed Operations Plan, including a maintenance Schedule. Not submitted. Thank you for you co, operation and we.look forward to wprking with you. Please contact Larry Henderson AfCP, Principal Planne~' or me if you have any questions. Sincerely, City Planner LJH:ts cc: Paul Biane, Supervisor 2nd District Tim Johnson, Assistant to Supervisor 2nd District. Pamela Steele, Hogle Ireland C~IG A. SHE~AN SAN DIEGO, CA 921al 2322 TELEPHONE 1619) 702-929 (619) 702-7B92 ~~ from the L~w Office of Craig ~, Sherman To: Ci~ 61e¢ Fmc: Craig She~an, Faxa (9~) 477-2846 P~es (in~l.~lng myer): P~on~ (909) 47~-2700 ~m Janua~31, Re: Hende~on 6r~k eCemmen~; Dear Deputy Clerk: Please immediately distribute to the City Attorney and City Council relating to the referenced matter scheduled on the City Council's February 2, 2005 agenda. ** If for any reason the City Clerk has cannot forward this document to the city attorney and council, please notify this sender immediately. Thank yOU very much. HARD COPY TO FOLLOW TH E INFOIt.M ATIC.N CONTAINED IN Tills FACSIMILE 1$ PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTiAl- INFORMATION INTENDED ON LY FOR'mE- USC, OF THE COMMUNICATION OR DISSEMINATION OR DISTRIBUTION OF IT TO ANYONE oTIIER T]I^N THE rNTENDED RECIPIENT IS STRICTI-¥ Clmc, A. Snv. ma2uq A?TORNI~Y .~'i' I~W 1901 F~RST AVENuE, SuITE 335 SAN DIEGO, CA 92101-2522 FACSIMILE TELEPHONE {619) 702-9291 (619) 702-7892 January31, 2005 Via Facsimile (909) 477-2846 MAYOR and CITY COUNCIL City of Rancho Cucamonga c/o City Clerk 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cueamonga, CA 91730 Via Faesitnile (213) 626-0078 James Markman, Esq. City Attorney City of Rancho Cucamonga RICHARDS WATSON GERSON 355 So. Grand Avenue, 40th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 Re: Demand for Continuance Because Lack of Due Process Satisfaction of Developer's Condition No. BIO-I City of Rancho Cucamonga - Hearing l%bmary 2, 2005 Granite Homes, Inc. / Rancho 2004 LLC / Henderson Creek Properties TO THE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA: This office represents The Habitat Trust for Wildlife, Inc. and is providing this letter as a demand that certain procedural and substantive due process rights be afforded to my client relating to the City of Rancho Cucamonga's (City) consideration and decision to disqualify The Habitat Trust fi-om holding or receiving mitigation land which City knew it had been contracted to hold in association with the Henderson Creek development project. JRN-31-2005 NON 09:33 fin I,~ra,est Hospitality FflX NO, 5305846290 P. 04/04 Page Two January 31,2005 City of Rancho Cueamonga Becau~ge the February 2, 2005 action of City stands to adversely af[eet a substantial property right of my client, my client is requesting sufficient written notice of any proposed adverse findings, and a reasonable opportunity to be heard. Lack of notice has ocoun'ed in this case despite a request made to City staffer Larry Henderson to provide a copy of the staff report he wag preparing to disqualify my client? While it is obv/ous that others have received and have mentioned to me that the staff report has been ch'eulated, Mr. Henderson has withheld and ignored my client's request. My client's ability to respond to the propo.~ed findings of the City has been substantially impaired, and is additionally lhnited due its counsel now being away from the office-2 The City is well aware that The Habitat Trust and the developer/applicant here have entered into an agreement for how the subject mitigation land was to be handled and transferred. To achieve this, the City amended language in the Henderson Creek development agreement specifically for this purpose, the City made reference and assertions about this expectation during its annexation application with LAFCO, and the City has specifically authorized the grant of mitigation land to my client, in this manner in the past. The City is taking this action with the full intent and knowledge to impair a lcuown and existing contract and the parties' contractual relations, and is believed to be doing so on a basis never done before and sp~ifically concocted to upend the qualification cfa specific entity? By its action, City is taking a ministerial approval of a project condition and improperly transposing it into a policy-making, spot legislation designed to adversely deny The Habitat Trust fundamental fights which it is entitled and which have previously been granted or assented. Despite the ~bit~amess and Constitutional impheations of C~ty actions (wkieh can only be argued later), my client should at least have an opportunity to review and respond to the City's proposed 'findings it intends to use to impair my client's fights. Verbal request made Janu..~ 26,200,5 asking ~br facsim/le or overnight de[ive~ of the staff report. Should deliveoy of the staff report and proposed adverse f'mdh~g~ be p~sonally delivered to my client or to its counsel, this might at least provide a small degree of fairness and chan0e to · e/o Room respond. Delive~~o The Habitat Trust's ¢°unsel sh°uld be made t° Cruig A' She~aan" 444, The village at Squaw Valley~ 1750 Village Ea~ Road. Olympia Village, CA 96146- Without s~-q~g City's contrived and proposed findings, the basis that City is actually proposing to disqualify The Habitat Trust is unknown. However, aa adverse eonaluslon wa~ an~eipatad~ dlseu..~,ed, and known by the applicant as being predetermined becat~Se the City was stated as being angry with my cltent for filing suit and litigating other matters. The applicant then held back pect'ormaace and obligations expecting whm the City now intends to fei]ow through with. JAN-31-2005 MON 09:33 AM I,L?..~ Hospi~lit~ FAX NO, 5305848290 P. 03/94 Page Three January 31, 2005 City of Rancho Cueamonga In sum, there are substantial problems with preceeding on February 2, 2005 because City has failed to give notice to my client and is not providing a reasonable opportanity to be heard. The doctrines of procedural and substantive due process dictete that this matter must be continued. Please notify this office of any administrative or legislative hearings, circulation of documents, or ,any other action or heating related to any adverse decision of the City that will impair my client's name or fundamental rights. Should you care to diecues this, I eon h~, reached limited hours today at 530-584-1000, room ~,44. or 619-840-1651. Craig A. Sherman ce: Michael Tidus, Esq., via fax (949) 752-0597 Roger A. Grable, Esq., via fax (714) 371-2550 Cliff J. Meyer, Esq., via fax (949) 720-0182 TAT Southwest - 30 North P. aymond Avenue, Suite 303, peseder~a, CA !111.0:~ Southeast - 439 WestwoOd SC 144, Faye~tevlBe, NC :;:$314 Phone - (626) 676-41t6 and (910) 947-5091 FAX cOVER SHEET DATE: 2/2/04 TO: Lar~y Henderson and Brad BuBer, City Planning St;~ff FROM: Leeone KIIpl~tein, Executive Director · The Habitat TruSt for Wildlife NOTE: Please read the attached le~er to Supervisor Biane and dlstrlbu~! 1:o Mayor Nexander and City Cound~ Members. InClude thi:~ lett~r as an EXHIBTT in the administrative record regarding the Her~de~'son Creek i ed developers request before the Cl~¥ .Coun.cil, ProJect and assoc ?.t ...... ,, .f', ., /'_, ~,,~;',~,,~x~.~,-.-, ~.~. 2/2/05 City council Agenoa ,[em ~ _L.-. -~. c.~,,-~,.~..~'-~ - · /- ~ 910 94V 5891 p.02 FE~--B~--2~05 04:$? AM SAGE.COUHCIL*SE*OFFICE " ABITAT February 2, 2005 Paul Blanc, Sups'visor Second Disui~t County of ~ B~o 385 N~ ~o~ Av~u~, F~ ~ S~ ~ino, CA ~1~110 ~: ~i~ho 2~0 ~ ~k ~j ~0 ~ Co~W Su~or B~a ae's l~r w Ci~ S~r Bi~e, of T~. h~ R~uo ~i~ (~S) ~ a 501(c)3 nonprofit or~:~on ~d ~ · ' i~ a~ ~a~ you ~ malicio~ly in~en~ ~ in~ ~& ~n~ busings T~t for Wildlife ~ ~e ~e~on C~k d~elo~t ~je~ ~ me~c g x~5 Ci~t s~ff H~n C~k d~lo~ ~ ~ 29, 2~ in ~ a~m~ ~ stop ~ mi'~.~a llm,~. ~s~ce O~ ~O9, ' -- n~-'l-' ~s~e~ f~ly c~;[ ~d ~ ~d ~e ~ F~iin~, it ~ ~t you ~ve ~ ~m y ~ in the ~e ~fthe enwronmenr, file T~ of "i~ctent ~so~es to p~o~ m~ge o~n s~ce, ~olom I~sutts t~ ~ly to se~e to ~1~ ~elopmem, inhere t~ir ia~m' ba~ a.~t build up their ~ b~ a~ts," - No~ ~ mond Avenue, ~u~ ~03, pantene, ~ ~ ~ Y ,, . . ~h~ - ~9 W~ SC ~M, Fly--VilifY, NC ..~1~ 4 Phone * (6~} 676M~6 ind (9~0) W.~eHebl~ru~.~ These accusations, you have made, were done so venomously and purpo~i~lly tv ca~s,~ :lcfsln~on ~d , . · ' ' IO11 In - ~nwula r~,a,~ - ~. , . greatly m. lury our charity orgamzati? and !ts .m. ~l.o_ ,, ...... ,~, ~-,,,,,~v and Co~rt OS-I ,mimes ........ · ' ini-"" to our nonprofk orip~uzauon so u~ y,~, ...... J ' · wotdd benefit instead. You have abused your political position as a Court' Super-i$or ~c, creatt: a scheme with the assisUmce of the City to interfere with our legally binding ~onlx~a,l arid .~.,~-ment agreement regarding the HendelSon Ct~k projeot. This soheme to take aw:Ly our ]~rope.~y n?,hls a~ harass our organization through City interrogations is unlawful and you n~), be l~,~:ld a~:~un'table in Court. Due to your s~heming. The Habitat Trust has had to obtain legal c~,~.sel !.o ~tdrtss li~s l-laving mad a copy of )'our referenced letter today, I would like to respond, and .~it~ ~:it th.,' City h~! been candid and allowed an opportunity for The Habitat Trust to respond I:arlier. O:~r reply to yom fit,se acousations follow; 1, Iasatlleieut Bas°urees - The °ut'°f'c°urt settlement f°r the Heng~'~rs°n '~:r~:k l:r°j¢~t giws l~t endowment of $5,000. per acre and totaling $430,000. In addition, .when '0 uilding I~,111 its ILre pulled on th~ Rancho Etiwanda Estates project (A~ ICesources) a~ additi ~mtl $ .~00,000 will be given to The Habitat Trust towards management and administratiolL The F. abitat Trusl is a .... ~ ....... -'-- additional funding, where tl~ Co~nv/, Open SI:ace. noltprofit chan~....tlas w.e anmvj, m ~ ~-~ ..... :... C. onsiderirl~ the Cour~tv OS E,istriCl: had District is a political entity an(l not a ¢onscrvauon v~,u~y ...... - restriotrd use of $700,000. in 1996 for r,~nsgemont of the 762-acre: North F. tiwlada Hii~it~t Preserve, it appears that The Habitat Trust has 8mater unrestricted [i~anci~I ~sour~¢~ to approximately 400-acres. Beyond financial resources for management of our Nature San~tul~ries, w,: altso have, e:,'tremc .y w~ll qualiiied scientific adviso~. Their r~sum~s are outstandin~ m~djust ~s i,~:c~, if eo~. belted, than those of the biologists contractexl by the County. The Habitat '?rust ~,u~ bi~e an)' needed at any time. Unlike the County, our nonprofit organization i.s r.o: t ~iufl~l to go throullh a ...... ~_ ....... a .^ ,,~ mo,,a~m~nt tasl~ af. cc~ npiished in a ti~,el) maoner ( i.e. it tool severei years [u~ m~ ~,u,,~., .... r- -~ .. Preserve). I! has been nearly ten years, since the County acquired'~.he Not'l'. ]=~tiwan~a llak.ital Preserve and still there am no barriers to keep out unamhorized vei~i~les ~ncl b~ses or Bu,zd ,)r sh~ff patzols to perform ~ enforcem~t 2. lqle frivolona Iswsalls- Thc Habitat Trust has near filed a frivolou~ la,~wtdt. 'i'he Cc ual), Supe~ism gi~ no clear examples. The I.[abitat Trust has ncwr filed l~wsait,~ ~o development. Lawsuits filed on the behalf of The Habitat Trust se~e to f,~[ce ¢¢,mp'.imtce ~lh th~ law, provide bett~r prote~ion of the environment and consem~on o~ irax~r, iled habitats wildlife. 3. Land Banks - The Hab,tat Trust does not have an), land haaks .. basiness of land l~ntcins, we hold lands i~ fee title with dedicated censer ration easom.,-n~,t i~t order to ensure that the mitigation lands that we have received r~:aia censervod and cormecred. We, like the CotmtT, seek to increase the number of habitat acres 'I~ ~ cc a~;~¢d. The dil~,'nce is that The Habitat Trust has pla~ed conservation easements on o~:r ~cqui:~d ntitigalio, habit tt lands, whereas it appeazs that the County has not ),et placed a dedicatcA censor*~~tion ¢~¢~meat on the North l~tiwand, Habitat preserve and others, although req~.:~xl by. law ~:o do so. -2- 4. Build up our own bank accouniL - The Habita~ Trust bas only om; bank ~m:r,t. account is used fo~ the ~nnng~ne~t of consolation property that wc have ac~lui~:~ md obtail~ nddiUon propen~ for the benefit of wildlife. In response to the County SupeFvjsor'! "Feasons for my proposal' #'s 1-,:',. 1. "County 0~-! is a public entity of San Bernordino County..." I~ otl:~,~ wo~s ~e O~en Space District is an arm of thc County and government ngancy, not ~ ~ta~,' Re~,~er~d and Nonprofit Conservution Or?nlv-tion md not an IRS quaUficd 501 ( c ) 3 ]~lic oqpmi on, "County OS-I is held accountable to the citizenry for its aetiott (s).' 'h'e t~ke t~.is ~ime tv point out tlutt the Coun~ OS-I is also acceptable for its inc.~iorc~ and faitu~ to l~ct conserve the North Etivamdn H~itat Preserve ~d ~ habitat m ~i~tto. provide soionlific r~ow and comm6~t otl development projects m,~jace~t to habitat Immetve~ that may negatively effect their biological in. grimy and qu~llty. It t~ppe~rr~,, that Ic~.ac.~,' the County and its OS-I branch ate government entities ~mt they do mit d.iff~r wino clevelepment and have en~ountged development over conservation needs. The Con~;~ O$-t £~iL,.~ to ~.~c~d~. written and omi comment during periods provided on the following dove*hE;~ncnt p~j¢cts~ tL~tt effect and are adjacant to habitat pr~ervos, Rancho Efiwanda. Rm~¢ho E~.vflm~ Henderson Creek ~ Richland-Pinehurst. County Supervisor Bialte sub._littc'c[ and sent a representative to a public hearing in support of the Tract AKA ?laigh Pacifio Projsor This projec~ received several letters with objection from Ir~S and The fact that the County OS-I ts not a nonprofit conservatmn orgamzatt,~n am, ,~s no, diffet.d with development proposals i~ one of the masons why habitat mit~tian ,'and~ should not be acquired and managed by th~s government political entity. The fact that The Habitat Trust has the sole mission to "G~ve Na~t,?~ ,~an ~uar]~, the Standard,~ and Practices of the nattonal l and Trust dlliance, State Government Codes .- The Nonprofit Integrity Act of 2004 ard fe&;ral reg ~ ati~~ m,ext by th~ [RS is all the reason needed legally to acquire and manage habitat 2. [Qluarterly meetings ore open to the publie - Good, but no big deal as ~. ¢.ounty s North ~fiwanda Commission fails to provide the public with r~view and ochre.ant on thzlr work and/or operational plans, if any. Tho County has dimc~cl their biologists, CmrtZd Br, idon ~ Bob McK~m to not communic~e with The Habitat Trust. We do no: consi~ ~t '~' a~ti'~u~e "ol~n" to the public. Furth*rmore, The Habitat Tn~t has previously re~.~stod ~ ,.~o~,~i~ o~ Commission and be~n deni~. The Habitat Trust currently does not hold meetings that am opan ~o th~ F~lblic, ~lthc,ngh our board is not oppo~.,d to it, for the following masons; (a) We are a Land Trust, not a Sierra Club sort of membership (b) Wo may, but have not yet, form Committeeds on Public Educatiof atid Cort~nunib' Outm~h, (c) We have not had any donors requesting to partake in Anmla~ Bo~ld Meetings. (d) Wo tak~ pride in being able to respond quiokly to the need,.~ ofth~ without the delays of having to wait to a certain time when a ~,~ lng is -~o b: held, 3, MamlgemeM lqan approved by USFWS and ~ - ~ Habitat T~t ~es a Suer B~e's ~r sM~ ~t ~e Coun~ and Ci~ bar, ye ht~zric~.~ had a good worMng ~u~ We ~d ~ smt~mt ~ ~ ~sle~ aa &~ Ci~' m~ C~u~ ~vc ~nfly b~ at o~ ~& ~h ~ ~ ~o~ dgvclo~a ~al p~cj~s v~in Ling Ym Mo~ T~mple R~ ~ ~e j~ a ~uple. · Slw]a~ we ~n~ue ~at ~l~t wor~ ~hfionship ~ try woridag t~ez' to ensu~ that ~e~ b appmp~M p~aflon of ~ou~ i~a t~ a ~." ~s gtgmc~t is ~y u~ ~, it ~ ~ M S~fit of~ Sa~ ~'s lel~ ~ l~es ~: a mo~ E~ ~ ~g~ ~uld ~r h~ ~ ifR ~'t for &e effo~ of~ ~ US~ ~ ~FG. By u~, &c whole N~ E~:.~ f~ ~d ~w ~el~ ~ i~ m ~ C~ ~d Co~. It ~ ~o~ ~ ~'ion o~ the ~cfl ~ ~t FWS ~d ~FG to stop ia ~d ~ US Fcd~ Ei~,.~ to put up ~e ~md~ ~lo~t ~j~ ~ ~ held ~ ~ R~I~ Tm~ ~r~fio a · U~ade~adeat publie ag~ ~e~...~ C~ ~ Coif OS-I ~:d E~n~ ~mi~i~ ~ n~ in~ b~ a~ b~a or april ~t~ of~e comply ~ ~o~ ~on~ ~ ~ ~a~, inclu~ ~ Nonp~fit ~ta~i of 20~. ~ non. fit s~ is ~y re~e~ by ~e ~S a~d S~e Aaomoy o~, R~s~ of~l~ T~. ~.LTA,0rg}. We ~v~ ~ a ~ng m~ si~e 2001 ~d. Blaa R~b~. Com~ m~ ~ ~ ~o Na6on~ ~ys, one C~f~a Sm~ ~ly, a fot~ day in. sire ~hop ~ ~on ~.~ ~ ~ US~S T~g ~r in X'i~ ~d ~ly ~ o~ ~d m~ ~ ~d~ a ~o~1 a~or~ to The ~bi'~ Tr~, of ~afion e~ ~ ~d ~li~. Wi~om ~o~g a~u~ ~ ~ !~ ~ you ~o~ to ~ Ci~, ~ ~bi~t ~t ~e~ ~ m~ ~& you ~ o~r 1~ di~ ~ Nov~ 2~ ~ disec~ kow we ~tay all ~ ~~ ~& m~g ~on obj~v~s for ~o No.~ Efi~ f~ ~ ~ ~ and 1~ ~1 ~ ~t m~g. a~ ~ o~oe, ~ ~e hn~saion 1~ ~ ~ ~e p~]ic. It ia e~ely ~h~s~ to ~d ~t ~t alt alo~g you 1~ ~r ~ to rcotO~ tn~ na following; of apolog~ to The 1-hbitat TruSt. · · ~i~t~ ;~ 1. S~ndal~ter , of Ranchococamonganoti~ingth~..Mayor~tCl~?u.acll 2. S~.ndalett~.totheC~ · ,--,~.'--o~lane29 2004tn~nganar~Itg~m$tl~t that you ma~e a great error ia ao~u-q~ ,,~ , in b~si~es~ tra~.s~,-tio,ns md make r~ommendations to ihe City Mayor and Council to ingrfer® .That tou legal agreoments ~ The Habitat Trust and Henderson Cr~!t: ~oj¢l,~ apologize roi lriis!e~ding thl~ City alld defaming The Habitat Irusi;. TI'il you support miligation land tmasference to The Habitat Trust according to iht~ l~galJ} ¢ontraCmal ~-ttlemcnt agr,~-ment. That you recommend ii,at the City move forward a~td no~: ~ut Tiao Habitat T. through any further interrogation as to ilgir heing a qualifi~ or :~:;~)1¢ c0~gr~ion as it is appagnt that th~ State Attorney (k, neral's Oflic~ of Cl~ari.'abl~ ]?~s~s a~l I~S Lave $inger~,ly, . ~ ~'ppmin, Executive Director Th~ Habitat Trust for Wildlif~ Copies to: Larry H=ndarson, City ofRanohe Cucamonga Mayor 8: City Counoil M~mb~r~, City of Rancho Cucamoag~. Law Offig o£Craig Sherman Todd Cardiff, Coastal Law Oroup Feb 01 ~005 12:OOPM Craig R, Sherman, EsR, · AOMINI~TIqATIOIq June t~ ~ 105~ C~ ~ Dr. St~ ffsTlst~le Com~. Geq, wumJif Celm- .'3lS~q~tflllAnlwkudAl~eaue, IL~ l~emr., ~am ~e~oamqlin4, C4 ~'MI~Oll m, ( N~.L }g?.,liO{,l, }'am{ (~}) ~17-3~ ~$ Fo~ 01 2005 12zoIPH Craig R. $hernanv Esq. 818702~1281 P'? PAUl. 2 Feb 01 200S 12~OOPM Crai5 fi. S~erman, Esq. GIB?O;~g~B] ~,s ..... 0 ~ DATE: July t5, ~ ~' ~SPO~ TO JUNE 14, ~ ~R FROM' ~AIJL B~NE,, l%bru~ 2, 2005 Paul Biane, Suporvi~or Second Distr/ct Board of Sul~'~or~ County of San Be~umiino C-ovemmmt Center 385 North Arrowlm~i Awnue, Fifth Floor San Bem~rdino. CA 92415-0110 ~ I~AC$~,~ f~_.) 38T-4833'and fg'l)~) 94..q..4037 RE: Oratfite/Rancho 2000 (Henderson Creek Project) and County Sup~isor B: ane's letter,n Cit~' of Itmcho Cucsmonl~, dated Sune 17, 2004. Supervisor Biane, The Habitat Trust for Wildlife ("The Habiiat Trust" and ~'THT") is reco/p~ized t y the U.S. Department of Treasury, Internal Revent~ Strvi~ (IRS) as a $01(c)3 nonprofit organizalio~ and State o'~'Calitbmia nonprofit ~'poraiion and relgstered charity. Upon review of C/ty Staff reoommendations and exhibits r~oeived ~oday, it .Pl~a~ ihat you delibt,rately and malidously intervened and interfered with conlraotual business agreernent~ b~tw¢~ ~,~lc Habitat Trust for Wildlife regard~ the Henderson Cr~k development project bl~ m~iiag ~th Cit~ staff,md Hende~on Creek developers on Sune 29,12004 in an at~empt to stop the miti~ti, m l~d lr~feren,c e to our or~anizaiion. Furthermore, it appears that you have wrongfully assumed, falsely char~e,t ~d l~cu.,~.d '1~1¢ I-Iabi~t Trust of "i. sufficient resources to propeeb~ manage open spa~e, a~ in ttt~ ~ar~ ~rt~e envi~'on~n¢~t, file fHvolou~ la~su#s ihat oaly w #e~ve to delay development, lncre~¢ their ,!and bc~t~ ,=~t bui;d ~ i~ir OW~i ~ acc. o~Nt$. ' I~outheast - 439 Westwood S¢ #X44~ Fayettevilh~- NC Z931.4 Phone - (~26) 678-.4X16 and (910) g47-1[;OgX www.?heHabltat'l'f, mt. af. R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A COISlMUNITY ~ I~ I~ VI C l~& Su ff rt DATE: February 2, 2005 TO: May~r and Members of the City Council ,, ~ j Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager ~[~/ FROM: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director ~/e'~',,I SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION AND CITY COUNCIL COMMUNITY SERVICES SUBCOMMITTEE'S RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE NEW APPOINTMENTS TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDATION: To approve the recommendation of the Community Foundation Executive Committee and City Council Community Services Subcommittee to appoint Angela Knox, Judy Gibson, Harry Gibson and Marian Nelson to the Community Foundation Board of Directors. BACKGROUND: The Community Foundation Board of Directors continues to actively recruit new Members to serve on its Board. As a result of their recent efforts, several community members submitted applications for Board membership. The applications were reviewed by the Community Foundation's Membership/Nominating Subcommittee (consisting of Harvey Cohen, David Parker and Patricia Carlson) who then forwarded their recommendation to the Community Foundation's Executive Committee. The Committee moved in support of the Subcommittee's recommendations and authorized the Subcommittee to interview those applicants best suited to fill the Board's needs in achieving its fundraising goals. The Membership/Nominating Committee interviewed five applicants and then forwarded their recommendation to appoint Angela Knox, Judy Gibson, Harry Gibson and Marian Nelson to the City Council's Community Services Subcommittee. The Subcommittee met on January 19th and, following discussion with staff on each of the potential Boardmembers, expressed their support of the Membership/Nominating Subcommittee's recommendation. Mayor Pro Tern Williams and Councilman Spagnolo, who serve as Members of the City Council Community Services Subcommittee, will present their recommendation for appointment at the February 2nd City Council meeting. Community Services Director FEBRUARY 24, 2005 TO: DEBRA ADAMS (CITY CLERK) FROM: ED SANCHEZ (909)989-5872 ~ CLERK 9869 ESTACIA CT, ~NCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. 91730 ~GA~ING: MARGARITA VILLE~ARGA~TA BEACH OVER TWENTY YEARS AGO, WE BOUGHT OUR FAMILY HOME ON ESTACIA CT. AT THAT TIME I FELT RANCHO CUCAMONGA WAS AN IDEAL CITY TO RAISE A FAMILY. I DO NOT TH1NK IT'S SUCH A GREAT PLACE NOW. SEVERAL YEARS AGO "MARGARITA VILLE" MOVED INTO THE SHOPPING CENTER ACROSS THE STREET. SINCE THEIR ARRIVAL THE QUALITY OF LIFE FOR THE RESIDENTS IN THE AREA HAS TAKEN A NOSE DIVE. MARGARITA VILLE WOULD HAVE SOME TYPE OF PROMOTION, WITH MANY PEOPLE IN ATTENDANCE AND THEIR PARKING LOT WOULD FILL TO CAPACITY. THE OVERFLOW OF THEIR PATRONS WOULD BE PARKING IN MY NEIGHBORHOOD (ONE TIME COUNTING OVER THIRTY CARS THAT DID NOT BELONG THERE.) BECAUSE OF THEIR PATRONS USING THE STREETS OF OUR NEIGHBORHOOD TO PARK, THIS BROUGHT PROBLEMS TO THE FRONT OF OUR HOUSES. THESE PEOPLE DRINK IN/OUT OF THEIR CARS, LEAVING BOTTLES/CANS AND TRASH ON OUR LAWNS, URINATING ON OUR LAWNS, WALL, BUSHES, TREES, WALLS, AND CARS. TWO WEEKENDS AGO POLICE EVEN CAUGHT PEOPLE HAVING SEX IN FRONT OF MY NEIGHBOR'S HOUSE. THAT SAME NIGHT, I RECEIVED A CALL FROM THAT NEIGHBOR TELLING ME HE HAD SEEN SOMEONE TAG/SPRAYING GRAFFITI ON ONE OF MY VEHICLES AND CHASED HIM OFF. I FILED A POLICE REPORT THAT NIGHT. I CAN'T TAKE THIS SITUATION ANYMORE! A FEW YEARS AGO, I PLACED A CALL TO BILL ALEXANDER TO INFORM HIM OF OUR SITUATION. LATER THAT DAY I RECEIVED A CALL FROM CHIEF ROD HOOPS. AFTER OUR CONVERSATION HE SCHEDULED A MEETING 1N HIS OFFICE WITH MARGARITA VILLE OWNERJMANAGEMENT, TWO OF MY NEIGHBORS AND MYSELF. BECAUSE OF THE MEETING AN AGREEMENT WAS REACHED. MARGARITA VILLE WOULD POST A BOUNCER ACROSS THE STREET FROM OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. WHEN ONE OF THEIR PATRONS WOULD CROSS THE STREET FROM OUR NEIGHBORHOOD, THEY WOULD BE SENT BACK BY THE BOUNCER TO RETRIEVE THEIR CARS AND PARK THEM 1N THEIR PARKING LOT. WHEN CHIEF HOOPS LEFT OUR CITY AND CHIEF ORTIZ REPLACED HIM, I MADE A CALL TO CHIEF ORTIZ. I FELT OUR NEW CHIEF NEEDED TO HAVE KNOWLEDGE OF OUR SITUATION. ANOTHER MEETING WAS HELD IN C~IIEF ORTIZ'S OFFICE WITH MARGARITA VILLE REPRESENTATIVES, PEOPLE FROM MY NEIGHBORHOOD, AND PEOPLE FROM THE MOBILE HOME PARK ON FOOTHILL. THE CONCLUSION OF THIS MEETING WAS TO "STAY THE COURSE". THIS MAY SOUND LIKE A NOBLE EFFORT BY MARGARITA VILLE, BUT IT HAS NOT WORKED. THE NEIGHBORS AND I CONTINUE TO SUFFER AS A RESULT. MARGARITA VILLE WOULD HAVE YOU BELIEVE THEY DO EVERYTHING IN THEIR POWER TO CONTROL THEIR CUSTOMERS, BUT THE j~,EALITY IS THEY ARE A BUSiNESS THAT REALLY DOES NOT CARE ABOUT ,THEIR NEIGHBORS. IT'S OBVIOUS THAT THEIR ONLY CONCERN IS MAKING 'A BUCK (AT EVERYONE'S EXPENSE). THE PURPOSE OF MAKiNG THIS A CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM IS TO EXPRESS OUR SERIOUS CONCERNS AND EXPOSE THE TYPE OF ENVIRONMENT THAT WE HAVE BEEN LIViNG WITH DURING THE EXISTENCE OF MARGARITA VILLE. RESIDENTS OF THIS CITY SHOULD NEVER HAVE TO ENDURE LIVING NEAR A BUSINESS LIKE THIS. THANK YOU, ED SANCHEZ To: Brad Bullet, City Planner for Rancho Cucamonga CC: Mayor Bill Alexander'; Council Members, City Attorney, City Manager, City Clerk, Police Chief, Fi~e Chief From: Residents living on the 9700 and 9800 block of Estacia Ct, the 8000 block of Pasito Ave, the 8000 Block of London Ave, the 8000 Block of Malvern Ave, the 8000 Block of Ramona Ave and the 9800 & 9900 Blocks of Foothill Blvd, and The Pines Mobile Home Park at 9999 Foothill Blvd. Date: 2/6/2005 Re: Quality of Life Issues Related to the Operation of the Bar named Margarita Beach (formerly named Margarita Ville) as discussed at City Council Meeting on February 2, 2005. At your request to Ed Sanchez on Thursday, February 3, 2005, we, the undersigned residents of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby formerly: 1. Request City Staff conducts an Investigation of the Level of Services required by the Police Dept (review m~y filed police repons) and the Fire Marshall for the bar now named Margarita Beach and formerly named Margarita Ville, which is located at 9950 Foothill Blvd. 2. Request City Planning or Code Enforcement staff conducts a Review of the Conditional Use Permit issued to Margarita Beach/Margarita Ville and any other permits issued for the business operations. 3. Request City Staff prepares a written Report to present to the Planning Commission, the City Council, and the concerned Residents, who initiated this investigation, at the second City Council meeting in March 2005. Signatures of Residents requesting the Rancho Cucamonga City staff to conduct an investigation into Margarita Ville/Beach. Name/Print Address Signature Name/Print Address Signature ,/ U,::: Name/Print Address Signature City C '1 OUI'IC1 Meeting Public Communications: Margaritaville .: IE Party :. Page I of 1 IEparb/is the place to be! With 3 bars to choose from there is a party happening every night of the week. Our three bars consist of Nargarita Beach (Rancho Cucamonga), Nargarita Beach (San Bernardino) and Godfather's (Chino). For directions or phone numbers to any of the bars, please dick on the directions link above or CLICI( HERE. Both Hargarita Beach bars offer a laid back ambiance with fantastic drink specials and your favorite top 40 music and videos. If you like the nightclub scene, Godfather's is the right choice for you. Come check out the latest in Hip Hop, Dance, Retro 8{ Old Skool. http://www, ieparty.com/web/about_us.asp 1/27/2005 .: IE Party :. Page 1 of 1 MARGARITA BEACH LOWERS PRICE OF DRAFT BEERS ON SUNDAY AND THURSDAY!!! ]oin us every Sunday night at Margarita Beach for S>I>N> (Service Industry Night). Enjoy 25¢ DraffL Beers from 8-10 P~4. Also, if you work in the Service Industry you will receive $2 U-C~II-It drinks with proof of employment. Thursday nights we now have 25¢ Draft Beers (down from 50¢) from 8-10PN. If you are a female, you will also receive (5) $2 U Carl-It drink rix! http://www.ieparty.com/web/about_us.asp 1/27/2005 .: IE Party :. Page 1 of l Join us every Thursday night at Margarita Beach for our infamous Backyard 8BQ and Beer Bash! Enjoy 50¢ Domestic Drafts from 8-10PM along with free tacos and hot dogs. We also have $2.00 Gold Tequila shots all night long! Hosted by 96.7 KCAL Rocks with free t-shi~ts, CD's, hats and more! For more info call (909) 945-1644 http://www, ieparty.com/web/directions.asp 1/27/2005 .: IE Party :. Page 1 of 3 These are our current promotions for Margarita Beach and Godfather's. They will be updated as new flyers are produced. Please wait for them to load as they are large files. http://www, ieparty.com/web/calendar/events_calendar.asp 1/27/2005 .: IE Party :. Page 2 of 3 http ://www.ieparty. c om/web/c al end ar/e vents_c alendar, asp 1/2 7/2 0 0 5 .: IE Party :. Page 3 of 3 http://www.ieparty.com/web/calendar/events_calendar, asp 1/27/2005 X 1 0 3 9 - The Inland Empire's Alternative Rock Page 1 of I tf it's a pady in t :e I.E., we're there. , and if we're 1here you're there! Come hang o~.t with On-Ail' Pemonalities and the X1039 I.BZ X TREMf: TEAM at a~]y one of oar club nights. Welcame to the pady! IVIARGARITA BEACH BYOB Thursday Flights with X 103-9 Joirl Steve Ir}mart at gitargarita Beach ir~ Rancho Cucamollga (909) 945~I644 Join Bobby Sate at Margarita Beach in Sari B~rnardirlo (909) ! 9993 21 and over only No cover charges, because cover charges suck! Bring Your Own Bee-arch and get $2 U-CalMts 50 cent drafts and free taco bar till 10pm For more info check out vczfw.ieparty.com MARGARITA BEACH Double X-rated Friday nights with X 103-9 Join Steve Inman in San Bernardlne at Margarita Beach (909) 9993 , Join Broady in Rancho Cucamonga at Margarita Beach (909) 945- 1644 21 and over only No cover charges, because cover charges suck! $2 Sex on the beach shots all night long Give-aways from STFU Clothing and X 1039. For more info.check out www.ieparty corn http://x1039.com/x in public/club_nights.php 1/27/2005 Snapshots :: Club Pics Page 1 of l Club Pics Album: $8g0 Bikini Albun]: Wild Ali)urn: B,Y.O,B. Tuesdays ~ Twins Wednesdays ~ Thursdays ~ Changed: 12/23/04 Coconuts Margarita Beach Album: ×X Fridays Album: Saturdays ~ Margarita Beach @ The Plush Bar Changed: 01/06/05 Cl~anged: 01iI0!05 Co¢~tair~s: 2 items, Contains: 7 items http://www.x1039.conffgallery/Club-Pics ; 1/27/2005 Snapshots :: B.Y.O.B. Thursdays ~ Margarita Beach :: mbeachl Page 1 of 1 http://www, x 1039.com/gallery/albumO3/mbeach 1 1/27/2005 Snapshots :: XX Fridays (&~ Margarita Beach :: mbeach2 Page I of 1 http://wvo,v.x 1039.com/gallery/albumO4/mbeach2 1/26/2005 Snapshots :: XX Fridays (~ Margarita Beach :: mbeachl Page I of 1 http://www, x 1039-com/gallery/album04/mbeach I 1/27/2005 Margantaville Over Flow Parking In Mv Neighborhood FEBRUARY 24, 2005 TO: DEBRA ADAMS (CITY CLERK) FROM: ED SANCHEZ (909)989-5872 CLERK 9869 ESTACIA CT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. 91730 REGARDING: MARGARITA VILLE/MARGARITA BEACH OVER TWENTY YEARS AGO, WE BOUGHT OUR FAMILY HOME ON ESTACIA CT. AT THAT TIME I FELT RANCHO CUCAMONGA WAS AN IDEAL CITY TO RAISE A FAMILY. I DO NOT THINK IT'S SUCH A GREAT PLACE NOW. SEVERAL YEARS AGO "MARGARITA VILLE" MOVED INTO THE SHOPPING CENTER ACROSS THE STREET. SINCE THEIR ARRIVAL THE QUALITY OF LIFE FOR THE RESIDENTS IN THE AREA HAS TAKEN A NOSE DIVE. MARGARITA VILLE WOULD HAVE SOME TYPE OF PROMOTION, WITH MANY PEOPLE IN ATTENDANCE AND THEIR PARKING LOT WOULD FILL TO CAPACITY. THE OVERFLOW OF THEIR PATRONS WOULD BE PARKING IN MY NEIGHBORHOOD (ONE TIME COUNTING OVER THIRTY CARS THAT DID NOT BELONG THERE.) BECAUSE OF THE1R PATRONS USING THE STREETS OF OUR NEIGHBORHOOD TO PARK, THIS BROUGHT PROBLEMS TO THE FRONT OF OUR HOUSES. THESE PEOPLE DRINK IN/OUT OF THEIR CARS, LEAVING BOTTLES/CANS AND TRASH ON OUR LAWNS, URINATING ON OUR LAWNS, WALL, BUSHES, TREES, WALLS, AND CARS. TWO WEEKENDS AGO POLICE EVEN CAUGHT PEOPLE HAVING SEX IN FRONT OF MY NEIGHBOR'S HOUSE. THAT SAME NIGHT, I RECEIVED A CALL FROM THAT NEIGHBOR TELLING ME HE HAD SEEN SOMEONE TAG/SPRAYING GRAFFIT1 ON ONE OF MY VEHICLES AND CHASED HIM OFF. I FILED A POLICE REPORT THAT NIGHT. I CAN'T TAKE THIS SITUATION ANYMORE! A FEW YEARS AGO, 1 PLACED A CALL TO BILL ALEXANDER TO INFORM HIM OF OUR SITUATION. LATER THAT DAY I RECEIVED A CALL FROM CHIEF ROD HOOPS. AFTER OUR CONVERSATION HE SCHEDULED A MEETING IN HIS OFF1CE WITH MARGARITA V1LLE OWNER/MANAGEMENT, TWO OF MY NEIGHBORS AND MYSELF. BECAUSE OF THE MEETING AN AGREEMENT WAS REACHED. MARGARITA VILLE WOULD POST A BOUNCER ACROSS THE STREET FROM OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. WHEN ONE OF THEIR PATRONS WOULD CROSS THE STREET FROM OUR NEIGHBORHOOD, THEY WOULD BE SENT BACK BY THE BOUNCER TO RETRIEVE THEIR CARS AND PARK THEM IN THEIR PARK1NG LOT. WHEN CHIEF HOOPS LEFT OUR CITY AND CHIEF ORTIZ REPLACED HIM, I MADE A CALL TO CHIEF ORTIZ. I FELT OUR NEW CHIEF NEEDED TO HAVE KNOWLEDGE OF OUR SITUATION. ANOTHER MEET1NG WAS HELD IN CHIEF ORTIZ'S OFFICE W1TH MARGARITA VILLE REPRESENTATIVES, PEOPLE FROM MY NEIGHBORHOOD, AND PEOPLE FROM THE MOBILE HOME PARK ON FOOTHILL. THE CONCLUSION OF THIS MEETING WAS TO "STAY THE COURSE". THIS MAY SOUND LIKE A NOBLE EFFORT BY MARGARITA VILLE, BUT IT HAS NOT WORKED. THE NEIGHBORS AND I CONTINUE TO SUFFER AS A RESULT. MARGARITA VILLE WOULD HAVE YOU BELIEVE THEY DO EVERYTHING IN THEIR POWER TO CONTROL THEIR CUSTOMERS, BUT THE REALITY IS THEY ARE A BUSINESS THAT REALLY DOES NOT CARE ABOUT THEIR NEIGHBORS. IT'S OBV1OUS THAT THEIR ONLY CONCERN IS MAKING A BUCK (AT EVERYONE'S EXPENSE). THE PURPOSE OF MAKING THIS A CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM IS TO EXPRESS OUR SERIOUS CONCERNS AND EXPOSE THE TYPE OF ENVIRONMENT THAT WE HAVE BEEN LIVING WITH DURING THE EXISTENCE OF MARGARITA VILLE. RESIDENTS OF THIS CITY SHOULD NEVER HAVE TO ENDURE LIVING NEAR A BUSINESS LIKE THIS. THANK YOU, ED SANCHEZ