The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2005/03/16 - Agenda Packet CITY OF RANCHo CUCAMONGA 10500 Civic Center Drive + Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730-3801 AGENDAS · Redevelopment Agency · Fire Protection District · City Council REGULAR MEETINGS 1st and 3rd Wednesdays ~ 7:00 p.m. MARCH 16, 2005 AGENCY~ BOARD &, CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS William J. Alexander .................... Mayor Diane Williams ............... Mayor Pro Tern Rex Gutierrez ............................ Member L. Dennis Michael ...................... Member Sam Spagnolo ......................... Member Jack Lam ......................... City Manager James L. Markman ............. City Attorney Debra J. Adams ..................... City Clerk ORDER OF BUSINESS 5:30 p.m. Closed Session .................... Tapia Conference Room 7:00 p.m. Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting... Council Chambers Regular Fire Protection District Meeting ... Counc# Chambers Regular City Council Meeting ............. Counc# Chambers INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC ~I~CHO ~.~L~,AMONOA TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL The City Council encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the Agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the City Council on any agenda item. Please sign in on the clipboard located at the desk behind the staff table, it is important to list your name, address and phone number. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under "Public Communications". There is opportunity to speak under this section at the beginning and the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the City Council should be given to the City Clerk for distribution. To address the City Council, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. All items to be placed on a City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, one week prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's office receives all such items. AGENDA BACK-UP MATERIALS Staff reports and back-up materials for agenda items are available for review at the City Clerk's counter and the Public Library. A complete copy of the agenda is also available at the sign in desk located behind the staff table during the Council meeting. LIVE BROADCAST Council meetings are broadcast live on Channel 3 for those with cable television access. Meetings are rebroadcast on the second and fourth Wednesdays of each month at 11:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. The City has added the option for customers without cable access to view the meetings "on-demand" from their computers. The added feature of "Streaming Video On Demand" is available on the City's website at www.ci.rancho- cucamonga.ca.uslwhatsnew.htrn for those with Hi-bandwidth (DSL/Cable Modem) or Low-bandwidth (Dial-up) Internet service. The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers Located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Members of the City Council also sit as the Redevelopment Agency and the Fire District Board. Copies of City Council agendas and minutes can be found at http:llwww, ci. rancho-cucamonga.ca, us If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477-2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MARCH 16, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY 1 _],RANCHO HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE UCAMONGA II A. TO I 1. Roll Call: Alexander__, Gutierrez__, Michael__, Spagnolo__, and Williams__. I ANNOUNCEMENm', SENTATIONS 1. Presentation by Dee Matreyek regarding Restorative Justice. 2. Update on the West Nile Virus Plan of Action by the West Valley Mosquito and Vector Control District. 3. Presentation of a Proclamation declaring Mamh 2005 as "Red Cross Month." I C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS II This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited tofive minutes per individual. Il i,. CONSENT CALENDAR I The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember or member of the audience for discussion. 1. Approval of Minutes: February 11,2005 (Special Meeting) February 12, 2005 (Adjourned Meeting) February 16, 2005 February 22, 2005 (Special Meeting) February 24, 2005 (Special Meeting) February 28, 2005 (Special meeting) March 2, 2005 (Special meeting) 2. Approval of Warrants, Register 2/24/05 through 3/8/05 and Payroll 1 ending 3/8/05, for the total amount of $944,932.90. 3. Approve to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of 18 February 28, 2005. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MARCH 16, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY 2 HALL, 10500 C~vlc CENTER DRIVE 4. Approval of plans, specifications and estimates and to authorize the 24 "Notice Inviting Bids" for Improvements in Phase 01/03 Final Work of Community Facilities District 2001-01 and 2003-01 for final street oveday, final striping, median island construction and landscaping, traffic signal modification, etc., on Foothill Boulevard from Rochester Avenue to 1-15 Freeway, to be funded from Acct. Nos. 16123035650/1442612-0 and 16143035650/1442614-0, and approval to allow a median break on Foothill Boulevard and change street tree designation on Foothill Boulevard. RESOLUTION NO. 05-095 26 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS IN PHASE 01-03 FINAL WORK OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICTS 2001-01 AND 2003-01, (TO BE BID AND CONSTRUCTED AS ONE PROJECT), INCLUDING FINAL STREET OVERLAY, FINAL STRIPING, MEDIAN ISLAND CONSTRUCTION AND LANDSCAPING, TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATION, ETC., ON FOOTHILL BOULEVARD FROM ROCHESTER AVENUE TO 1-15 FREEWAY, IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS 5. Approval of plans and specifications for the "Citywide Concrete Repair, Tree removal and Tree Planting Annual Maintenance 32 Agreement renegotiable on a year-to-year basis, and authorize the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids", to be funded from Acct. No. 1001316-5300 ($350,000) as approved in the 2004-2005 budget. RESOLUTION NO. 05-096 33 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR "CITYWIDE CONCRETE REPAIR, TREE REMOVAL AND TREE PLANTING ANNUAL MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT RENEGOTIABLE ON A YEAR- TO-YEAR BASIS" AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CiTY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS 6. Approval of a Resolution authorizing the Deputy City Manager, 37 Finance Officer, and Fire Chief to execute the appropriate documentation for the purpose of obtaining Federal and State assistance from various competitive grant programs. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MARCH 16, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY 3 gA c.o HALL, 10500 C~WC CENTER DRIVE ~.U~A.~ONGA RESOLUTION NO. 05-097 38 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AUTHORIZING THE DEPUTY CITY MANAGER, FINANCE OFFICER, AND FiRE CHIEF TO EXECUTE THE APPROPRIATE DOCUMENTATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF OBTAINING FEDERAL AND STATE ASSISTANCE FROM VARIOUS COMPETITIVE GRANT PROGRAMS 7. Approval of the Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services 39 Update. 8. Approval of expenditure with Brodart, Inc. for the acquisition of library 50 materials for the Archibald Library in the amount of $70,000 from Library Account 12906015200. 9. Approval of a request from the Christian Okoye Foundation for a 52 Waiver of Rental Fees for a Free Youth Football/Soccer Clinic at the Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter and Adult Sports Complex (soccer fields) on April 2, 2005. 10. Approval for Annual Product Support and Service Renewal from the 55 provider, Oracle Corporation in the amount of $34,100 to be funded from General Fund, Administrative Services Department, Information Systems Division, 1001-209-5300 and 1001-209-5152. 11. Approval to appropriate $76,000 out of AB1600 reserves into Acct. No.1016301-5300 (Contract Services) in connection with City/County 62 initiated Annexation DRC2004-01204. 12. Approval of an expenditure of $24,00 for the marking of underground 69 utilities by Underground Technology Inc. (UTI) (CO 03-087) as approved in the 04/05 budget, and appropriate an additional $16,000 for Fiscal Year 2004-2005, to be funded from Acct. No. 1001316- 5300. 13. Approval to accept Grant Revenue in the amount of $30,833.00 from the United States Department of Justice 2005 Byrne Justice 70 Assistance Grant (JAG) Award into Acct. No. 1354000-4740 (Grant Income) for use by the Police Department for the purchase of Police related equipment and technology. 14. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B 72 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for DRC2002- 00264, located on the southwest corner of 6~h Street and Utica Avenue, submitted by 6th & Utica, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MARCH 16, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY 4 RANCHO HALL, 10500 C~vlc CENTER DRIVE C~UCA.MONGA RESOLUTION NO. 05-098 75 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DRC2002-00264 RESOLUTION NO. 05-099 76 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DRC2002-00264 15. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities and 84 Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for DRC2004- 00145, located on the south side of Arrow Route, east of Utica Avenue, submitted by Public Storage, Inc. RESOLUTION NO. 05-100 87 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR DRC2004-00145 RESOLUTION NO. 05-101 88 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DRC2004-00145 16. Approval of Map, improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and 96 Ordering the Annexation to landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 for Tract 16554, located at the southwest corner of Hermosa and Base Line Road, submitted by HL Homes Corporation. RESOLUTION NO. 05-102 99 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 16554, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MARCH 16, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY ~R, uqc}~o HALL, 10500 CIwc CENTER DRIVE UCAMONGA RESOLUTION NO. 05-103 100 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR TRACT MAP 16554 17. Approval to execute a Professional Services Agreement in the amount 110 of $61,000 to Butsko Utility Design, Inc. (CO 05-021), for system planning, design and inspection of Marketplace Properties and Victoria Gardens Southern Parcel within the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility service area, to be funded $26,900 from Acct. No. 17053035650/1485705, $34,100 from Acct. No. 17053035650/1487705 Municipal Utility Fund. 18. Approval of a Professional Services Agreement with Maximus (CO 05- 112 022) in the amount of $50,200 to provide consulting services related to preparation of an Engineering Division User Fee Study and an Engineering Division Development Impact Fee Study, to be funded from Acct. No. 10163015300, and approval of an appropriation of $50,200 to Acct. No. 10013055300. 19. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 16454-1, located at the southeast corner of Base Line Road and Etiwanda 114 Avenue, submitted by KB Home Greater Los Angeles, Inc. RESOLUTION NO. 06-104 117 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 16454-1 20. Approval to accept Improvements, retain the Faithful Performance and 118 Labor and Material Letter of Credit for six months after acceptance, accept a Maintenance Guarantee Cash Deposit and file a Notice of Completion for Improvements for DRC2003-00072, located on the east side of Archibald Avenue, between 4th and 6th Street, submitted by Calwest Industrial Properties. RESOLUTION NO. 05-105 120 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2003-00072 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MARCH 16, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY cRA~cHo HALL, 10500 C~WC CENTER DRIVE UC~-MONGA 21. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance 121 Bond, accept a Letter of Credit as the Maintenance Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for Improvements for DRCDR00-41, located on the south side of 6th Street, west of Haven, submitted by Cabot Industrial Properties, L.P. RESOLUTION NO. 05-106 123 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC iMPROVEMENTS FOR DRCDR00-41 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 22. Approval to release the Maintenance Cash Deposit for PM 15278, 126 located on the southwest corner of Banyan Street and London Avenue, submitted by P.K.T. Properties, LLC. 23. Approval to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 14162, located on the south side of 19th Street at the western City 128 limit, submitted by Promus Investment Network, Inc. 24. Approval to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 130 14494-1, located on the north side of Banyan Street, west of Day Creek Boulevard, submitted by US Home Corporation. 25. Approval to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bonds for Tract 15540, located between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Route, east of 132 Baker Avenue, submitted by Van Daele Development Corporation. 26. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Pedormance Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond and file a Notice of Completion for 134 improvements for Tract 16263, located o¢~ the southeast corner of Base Line Road and Ellena West, submitted by KB Home Greater Los Angeles, Inc. RESOLUTION NO. 05-107 136 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 16263 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 27. Approval to accept the Mall On-Site Water and Sewer of Community 137 Facilities DJstrict 2003-01, Contract No. 03-117 as complete, retain the Faithful Performance Bond as a Guarantee Bond, release the labor and Material Bond, and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $1,395,980.00. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MARCH 16, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY cRANCHO HALL, 10500 C~WC CENTER DRIVE UC3-MONGA RESOLUTION NO. 05-108 140 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE MALL ON- SITE WATER AND SEWER OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2003-01, CONTRACT NO. 03-117 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 28. Approval to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond No. 83 SB 141 104078528 BCM in the amount of $35,260.01 for the Banyan Street Widening from Rochester Avenue to 2000' west, Contract No. 03-050. 29. Approval to accept the Temporary Power Pole and Overhead Wire Installation project, Contract No. 03-077, as complete, approval of a 143 change order in the amount of $62,171.80, to be funded from Acct. No. 17053035650/1382705-0 from Municipal Utility fund, retain the Faithful Performance Bond as a Guarantee Bond, release the Labor and Material Bond, and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $109,036.80. RESOLUTION NO. 05-109 145 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE TEMPORARY POWER POLE AND OVERHEAD WIRE INSTALLATION PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. 03-077 AND AUTHORIZING THE FiLiNG OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 30. Approval to accept the Phase lB(e) of Community Facilities District 146 2001-01, including landscaping and amenities on Arbor Lane, Contract No. 04-069 as complete, retain the Faithful Pedormance Bond as a Guarantee Bond, release the Labor and Material Bond, and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $1,664,586.54. RESOLUTION NO. 05-110 149 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PHASE lB(E) OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2001- 01, INCLUDING LANDSCAPING AND AMENITIES ON ARBOR LANE, CONTRACT NO. 04-069 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MARCH 16, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY 8 (_~[~CRO HALL, 10500 C~WC CENTER DRIVE 31. Approval of the Resolutions approving and confirming the Engineer's 150 Report and Setting of Public Hearing for May 18, 2005, to levy the Annual Assessments for Fiscal Year 2005/2006 for Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE IS PROPOSED. RESOLUTION NO. 05-111 152 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FOR APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 AND 10. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE PROPOSED. RESOLUTION NO. 05-112 153 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 AND 10 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2005/2006 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO 32. Approval of the Resolutions approving and confirming the Engineer's Report and Setting of Public Hearing for May 18, 2005, to levy the 155 annual assessments for Fiscal Year 2005/2006 for Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1,2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE IS PROPOSED. RESOLUTION NO. 05-113 157 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FOR APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORTS FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6,7ANDS. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE PROPOSED. RESOLUTION NO. 05-114 158 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2005/2006 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TiME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO ~ CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MARCH 16, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY 9 cg~cHo HALL, 10500 C~wc CENTER DRIVE UCAMONGA 33. Approval of the Resolutions approving and confirming the Engineer's 160 Reports and Setting of Public Hearing for May 18, 2005, to levy the Annual Assessments of Fiscal Year 2005/2006 for the Park and Recreation Improvement District (PD-85). NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE IS PROPOSED. RESOLUTION NO. 05-115 162 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FOR APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORT FOR PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-85). NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE PROPOSED. RESOLUTION NO. 05-116 163 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF: THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-85) FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2005/2006 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO E. CONSENT ORDINANCES I The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non- controversial. The Council will act upon them at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion. 1. CONSIDERATION OF 2ND READING OF AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, 165 ADDING CHAPTER 19.20 TO TITLE 19 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO THE PROTECTION AND REGULATION OF THE CITY'S MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM (MS4) AS REQUIRED BY STATE AND FEDERAL LAW CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MARCH 16, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY 10 c. Ra~,tcHo HALL, 10500 C~VlC CENTER DRIVE UCA.MONGA ORDINANCE NO. 740 (second reading) 167 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 19.20 TO TITLE 19 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO THE PROTECTION AND REGULATION OF THE CITY'S MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM (MS41 F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. No Items Submitted. G. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. 1. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REVISING REGULATIONS 199 PERTAINING TO POSSESSION AND CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES WITHIN CITY PARKS1 AND AMENDING TITLE 12 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE ORDINANCE NO. 741 (first reading) 201 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REVISING REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO POSSESSION AND CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES WITHIN CITY PARKS, AND AMENDING TITLE 12 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE 2. CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY 204 FOR THE ACQUISITION IN EMINENT DOMAIN OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS TO AND WIDENING OF BASE LINE ROAD ACROSS A PORTION OF APN 1100-011-02 , ~I~, CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MARCH 16, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY ] 1 (..~,[E~CHO HALL, 10500 C~wc CENTER DRIVE UGAMONGA RESOLUTION NO. 05-094 215 A RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES AND AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION THEREOF IN CONNECTION WITH THE IMPROVEMENTS TO AND WIDENING OF BASE LINE ROAD (PORTIONS OF ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 1100-011-02) II H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS ] The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. 1. UPDATE ON IMPACTS OF MEASURE I ORDINANCE ON CITY 222 TRANSPORTATION FEE STRUCTURE I[ ,. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. 1. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Councilmember.) 2. APPROVAL OF POLICIES AND PROCEDURES GOVERNING THE 229 SERVING OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES IN THE SENIOR AND COMMUNITY CENTER AT CENTRAL PARK 3. RECONSIDERATION OF APPOINTMENTS TO OMNITRANS AND SANBAG (Oral) 4. CONSiDERATiON OF REQUEST BY STEVE AND JOAN KNECHT 247 FOR EXTENSION OF TiME IN RELOCATING DOGS II j. ADJOURNMENT I, Debts J. Adams, City Clerk ot the City of Raneho Cueamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on March 10, 2005, seventy two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. February 11,2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Special Meetinfl A special meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Friday, February 11,2005, at the Best Western Heritage Inn (Haven Room) located at 8179 Spruce Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor William J. Alexander called the meeting to order at 10:00 a.m. Present were Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, L. Dennis Michael, Sam Spagnolo, Diane Williams and Mayor William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager; and James Markman, City Attorney. B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS No communication was made from the public. ][ C. ITEM(S) OF BUSINESS ] C1. CITY COUNCIL DISCUSSION AND CONSIDERATION OF ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS, CONSENSUS BUILDING AND PRIORITIES The meeting was led by facilitator, Geoff Ball with Geoff Ball & Associates. The meeting led by facilitator, Geoff Ball with Geoff Ball & Associates. The Council discussed the various roles that Council members have with each other, the community and staff. The Council members also drafted a Mission Statement for the City Council as well as reviewed the accomplishments of the City over the last twenty-five years since incorporation. They also discussed the issues and needs facing the community in the next five to ten years. The Council also discussed the Council agenda and agreed to streamline the agenda format so that Council Communications be limited to three minutes per individual and be placed under the "Council Business" section of the agenda and the "identification of items for the Next Meeting" and the second "Public Communications" sections should be eliminated from the agenda. City Council Special Meeting Minutes February 11, 2005 Page 2 D. ADJOURNMENT At 4:25 p.m., the meeting adjourned to Saturday, February '12, 2005 at 9:00 a.m., to be held at the Best Western Heritage Inn located at 8179 Spruce Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, California, to continue discussions. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: * February 12, 2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Adjourned Meeting II ^. CALL TO ORDER II An adjourned meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Saturday, February 12, 2005, at the Best Western Heritage Inn (Haven Room) located at 8179 Spruce Avenue, Rancho Cucamenga, California. Mayor William J. Alexander called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m. Present were Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, L. Dennis Michael, Sam Spagnolo, Diane Williams and Mayor William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager; and James Markman, City Attorney. B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS No communication was made from tho public. C. ITEM(S) OF BUSiNESS Gl. GITY GOUNGIL DISCUSSION AND GONSIDERATION OF ORGANIZATIONAL EFFEGTIVENESS, GONSENSUS BUILDING AND PRIORITIES The meeting continued to be led by facilitator, Geoff Ball with Geoff Ball & Associates. The Council discussed the role of the Council in working with each other, staff and the community, especially when there are differences of perspective. The Council also received a list of current and potential new projects and priorities that has been prepared by staff. The Council determined to meet in the next seven to ten days to discuss the projects and priorities in further detail. City Council Adjourned Meeting Minutes February 12, 2005 Page 2 II D. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 1:40 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: * February 16, 2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION MINUTES Il h. CALL T0 ORDER The Rancho Cucamonga City Council held a closed session on Wednesday, February 16, 2005, in the Tapia Room of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 5:30 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander. Present were Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, L. Dennis Michael, Sam Spagnolo, Diane Williams and Mayor William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer and Linde D. Daniels, Redevelopment Director. Il B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) I Mayor Alexander announced the closed session item. B1. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR CALTRANS EXCESS PROPERTY LOCATED NORTH OF THE 210 FREEWAY AND SOUTH OF HIGHLAND AVENUE BETWEEN ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND 750 FEET EAST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, PARCEL NO. DD007627-01-01 AS SHOWN ON CALTRANS R/W MAP NO. 437511-15 - CITY [I C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) No communication was made on the closed session items. D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION The closed session began at 5:35 p.m. [I E. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS I The closed session recessed at 6:45 p.m. with no action taken. City Council Minutes February 16, 2005 Page 2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Regular Meetinq A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, February 16, 2005, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor William J. Alexander called the meeting to order at 7:24 p.m. Present were Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, L Dennis Michael, Sam Spagnolo, Diane Williams and Mayor William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Mike Nelson, Sr. Redevelopment Analyst; Jim Frost, City Treasurer; Dawn Haddon, Purchasing Manager; Sid Siphomsay, Information Systems Analyst; Mike Toy, Information Systems Specialist; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Jerry Dyer, Sr. Civil Engineer; Maria Perez, Associate Engineer; Brad Buller, City Planner; Larry Henderson, Principal Planner; Gail Sanchez, Planning Commission Secretary; Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director; Paula 'Pachon, Management Analyst Ill; Captain Pete Ortiz, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; Chief Peter Bryan, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst III; Kimberly Thomas, Management Analyst II; Shirr'l Griffin, Office Specialist II - City Clerk's Office; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. [ B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS I B1. Presentation of checks to the Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation and the Rancho Cucamonga Library Foundation from the Mark Christopher Charity Classic presented by Adelphia Nationwide Tour Event held in the City of Rancho Cucamonga at the Empire Lakes Golf Course. Stephen Wagner from the Mark Christopher Charity Classic presented a $5,000 check to Tony Mize from the Community Foundation and Frances Howdyshell from the Library Foundation. II c, PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS [ C1. James Frost, City Treasurer, had his Grandmother's bible with him that was over 1,000 years old. He commented on the "Run for the Wall" motorcycle race that would be held in May. He commented on the meaning of it stating it is to recognize and create awareness for PeW's and those MIA's. He stated the bible has in it some of his family history, which talks about those family members that were in previous wars. He stated there are still many people that don't know if their loved ones are dead or alive. C2. Nicole Myerchin stated the City pays almost $775,000 for the animal shelter contract. She commented on the need for veterinary care and stated she is not sure what the City gets for what they pay with this contract. She stated she is not sure why the dog breeding issue is on the agenda again. City Council Minutes February 16, 2005 Page 3 [ D. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS II D1. Councilmember Michael stated the Council held a team building/organizational effectiveness meeting over the last weekend and wanted to make the meetings more effective. He stated the goals will be discussed next week and that would include public safety, which is the City's first priority. D2. Councilmember Williams had no comments. D3. Councilmember Spagnolo stated the Council is trying to do the best they can and asked the audience to respect them and not respond with any "booing" or clapping. D4. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he enjoyed the team building and commented on the decorum of the meetings they talked about. He stated he is happy to represent someone if they have an issue, but asked that people refrain from snide remarks. He thanked people for coming to the meetings. D5. Mayor Alexander commented the team building sessions were very good. [I t. CONSENT CALENDAR I El. Approval of Minutes: January 19, 2005 (Michael absent) February 2, 2005 (Michael absent) E2. Approval of Warrants, Register 1/25/05 through 2/7/05, and Payroll ending 2~7/05, for the total amount of $3,092,979.61. E3. Approve to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of January 31,2005. E4. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the construction of the Haven Avenue Street Widening and Storm Drain Improvement Project from Base Line Road to north of 19th Street, to be funded from Acct. No. 11243035650/14061124 (Transportation Funds) and Acct. No. 11103165650/1464110 (Beautification Funds). RESOLUTION NO. 05-049 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE HAVEN AVENUE STREET WIDENING AND STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FROM BASE LINE ROAD TO NORTH OF 19TM STREET AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS ES. Approval of Iow bid vendor selection for the replacement of two pieces of equipment, Smithco field rakes, from Golf Ventures west of Corona, California, in the amount of $33,964.96, to be funded from Acct. No. 1712001-5603 as approved in the 04-05 budget. E6. Approval of Iow bid vendor selection for the replacement of five pieces of equipment, one aerator, one utility vehicles, one seeder and two top dressers from AA Equipment of Montclair, California, in the amount of $59,269.50, to be funded from Acct. No. 1712001-5603, as approved in the 04-05 budget. E7. Approval to appropriate $22,000 from the Community Development Technical Services Fund into Acct. No. 1016301-5300 (Contract Services) to fund temporary staffing assistance with revising, updating and testing the Tidemark software system used by the Building and Safety, Engineering and Planning Departments. City Council Minutes February 16, 2005 Page 4 E8. Approval cfa Resolution stating the Caltrans Excess Property, located north of the 210 Freeway and south of Highland Avenue between Archibald Avenue and 750 feet east of Archibald Avenuel will be used for public purposes, more specifically a public park. REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION BY COUNClLMEMBER WILLIAMS. RESOLUTION NO. 05-050 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, THAT THE EXCESS PROPERTY TO BE ACQUIRED FROM CALTRANS, LOCATED NORTH OF THE 210 FREEWAY AND SOUTH OF HIGHLAND AVENUE BETWEEN ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND 750 FEET EAST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, WILL BE USED FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES, MORE SPECIFICALLY A PUBLIC PARK E9. Approval of a Completion of Termination of Temporary Easement for the benefit of Rancho Amigos Investors, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, and Dearden Propedies, a California General Partnership. RESOLUTION NO. 05-051 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A COMPLETION OF TERMINATION OF TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF RANCHO AMIGOS INVESTORS, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AND DEARDEN PROPERTIES, A CALIFORNIA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP El0. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities for DRC2002-00884, ocated on the south side of 6th Street, east of Utica Avenue, submitted by F & F Simon Rancho Tech, LLC. RESOLUTION NO. 05-052 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR DRC2002- 00884 Ell. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities, Monumentation Cash Deposit and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for Parcel Map 16539, located at 6th Street and Santa Anita Avenue, submitted by La-Santa Anita, LLC. RESOLUTION NO. 05-053 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NO. 16539, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT RESOLUTION NO. 05-054 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR PARCEL MAP 16539 City Council Minutes February 16, 2005 Page 5 E12. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and Ordering the Annexation to landscape Maintenance District No. 7 and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 7 for Tract Map 16466, located north of Banyan Street between Etiwanda and Bluegrass Avenues, submitted by Carriage Estates III, LLC. RESOLUTION NO. 05-055 A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR TRACT 16466 RESOLUTION NO. 05-056 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7 FOR TRACT MAP 1644 E13. Approval of Map and Monumentation Cash Deposit for Parcel Map 16657, located at the southeast corner of Rochester Avenue and Jack Benny Drive, submitted by Stadium Plaza South, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company. RESOLUTION NO. 05-057 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NO. 16657 AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT E14. Approval of a contract amendment (CO 03-091) adjusting the hourly rates for inspection services provided by Aufbau Corporation. E15. Approval of the execution of an amendment to the Professional Services Agreement (CO 00-044) for Engineering Design Services for the Haven Avenue Street Widening and Storm Drain Project from Base Line Road to south of Route 210 Freeway, to Dan Guerra & Associates to increase the contract amount from $440,691.05 to $515,691.05, to be funded from Measure "1" Funds, Acct. No. 11763035650/1124170-0 and appropriate $75,000.00 from Measure "1" fund balance to Acct. No. 11763035650/1124170-0. E16. Approval to contract with R.¥. Rodriguez (CO FD 05-001 & CO-012) for ongoing fuel station repair, maintenance, testing, and certification at the Corporate Yard, Sports Complex and Fire Stations 171,172, 174, 175, 176 for an annual amount not to exceed $20,500 ($15,000 from fund number 1001317-5300; $5,500 from fund number 3281527-5200) for the remainder of fiscal year 04/05, with the option to renew for additional one (1) year periods upon review of contract and mutual consent, up to a total of three (3) years. E17. Approval of the execution of Program Supplement No. 007-M to the Administering Agency-State Agreement No. 08-5420 covering the installation of solar-powered flashing beacons on Hermosa Avenue at 500 feet north of and 500 feet south of Feron Boulevard. E18. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for PM 16245 and PM 16245 Fourth Street Storm Drain Systems, located at the nodhwest corner of 4th Street and Milliken Avenue, submitted by Jefferson on Fourth, L.P. City Council Minutes February 16, 2005 Page 6 RESOLUTION NO. 05-058 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR PM 16245 AND PM 16245 FOURTH STREET STORM DRAIN SYSTEMS E19. Approval to accept the Improvements and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for CUP94- 39, located on the north side of Ashford Street, east of Center Avenue, submitted by Cucamonga Valley Water District. RESOLUTION NO. 05-059 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR CUP94-39 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FQR THE WORK E20. Approval to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond for DR00-28, located at the northwest corner of Milliken Avenue and Arrow Route, submitted by Catellus Development Corporation. E21. Approval to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond for DR00-32, located on the southeast corner of 7th Street and Utica Avenue, submitted by Seventh Street and Utica Partners, LLC. E22. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for Improvements for DRC2001-00638, located on the west side of Day Creek Boulevard at Highland Avenue, submitted by Day Creek Investors, LLC. RESOLUTION NO. 05-060 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2001-00638 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK E23. Approval to release the Maintenance Guarantee Cash Deposit for DRC 2002-00218, located on the west side of Santa Anita Avenue, 1000 feet north of 4~h Street, submitted by Ridge Santa Anita Partners, LLC. E24. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for DRC2002-00606, located on the west side of Hermosa Avenue, south of 8th Street and north of 7th Street, submitted by Hermosa 2, PI, LLC. RESOLUTION NO. 05-061 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2002-00606 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK E25. Approval to accept Improvements, retain $1,150.00 of the Faithful Performance Cash Deposit in lieu of a Maintenance Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for DRC2003-00302, located on the south side of Arrow Route, west of Hellman Avenue, submitted by West Rock, LLC City Council Minutes February 16, 2005 Page 7 RESOLUTION NO. 05-062 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF.THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2003-00302 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK E26. Approval to accept tmprovements, retain $930.00 of the Faithful Performance Cash Deposit in lieu of a Maintenance Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for DRC2003-00330, located at the southwest corner of 6tt~ Street and Milliken Avenue, submitted by Silver Oak Development. RESOLUTION NO. 05-063 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2003-00330 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK E27. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for DRC2003-00869, located at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and 6th Street, submitted by OItmans Construction Co. RESOLUTION NO. 05-064 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2003-00869 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK E28. Approval to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond for DRCDR01-03, located on the east side of Hermosa Avenue, north of Sharon Circle, submitted by Fullmer Construction. E29. Approval to accept the Improvements, release all bonds, and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for PM 15731, located at the southeast corner of White Oak and Elm Avenues, submitted by KDC Rancho Two, LLC. RESOLUTION NO. 05-065 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PM 15731 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK E30. Approval to release of Maintenance Guarantee Bond for TR 13279, located on the south side of Highland Avenue, between Rochester and Milliken Avenues, submitted by Lyon Homes, Incorporated. E31. Approval to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bonds for TR 15072 and TR 15072-1, located on the southwest corner of Base Line and Rochester Avenue, submitted by Lewis Development Company and Kaufman and Broad of Southern California, Inc. E32. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for TR 15838, located on the southwest corner of Wilson Avenue and Bluegrass Avenue, submitted by Standard Pacific Corporation. RESOLUTION NO. 05-066 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TR 15838 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK City Council Minutes February16,2005 Page 8 E33. Approval to accept the Arrow Route Pavement Rehabilitation from Archibald Avenue to Hermosa Avenue, Contract No. 04-168 as complete, approval to appropriate $6,000.00 to Acct. No. 11763035650/1370176-0 from Measure "1" fund balance, retain the Faithful Performance Bond as a Guarantee Bond, release the Labor and Material Bond, and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $267,120.81. RESOLUTION NO. 05-067 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE ARROW ROUTE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM ARCHIBALD AVENUE TO HERMOSA AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. 04-168 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK MOTION: Moved by Michael, seconded by Williams to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports contained within the Consent Calendar with the exception of item 8. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. DISCUSSION OF ITEM 8. Approval of a Resolution stating the Caltrans Excess Property, located north of the 210 Freeway and south of Highland Avenue between Archibald Avenue and 750 feet east of Archibald Avenue, will be used for public purposes, more specifically a public park. Councilmember Williams asked for a staff report on this and stated she wanted everyone to know this would be a public park. A staff report was presented by Joe O'Neil, City Engineer. MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Michael to approve the staff recommendation for item 8. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. Item Jl. Was discussed at this time. The minutes will remain in agenda order. II CoNsENT O N CES ] No Items Submitted. II G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS ] No Items Submitted. City Council Minutes February 16, 2005 Page 9 H1. APPROVAL OF RESOLUTIONS AUTHORIZING THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA POLICE DEPARTMENT TO ENFORCE THE CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE IN THE MARLBOROUGH VILLAS, TERRA VISTA WESTGATE, AND RANCHO VISTA GATED COMMUNITIES AS AUTHORIZED BY CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE SECTION 21107.7 A staff repod was presented by Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst Ill. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council was: Dwayne Sharp of the Rancho Vista Homeowner's Association, stated he supports this request. There being no further input, the public hearing was closed. RESOLUTION NO. 05-068 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE ENFORCEMENT OF THE CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE IN THE MARLBOROUGH VILLAS GATED COMMUNITY (GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, NORTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, WEST OF RAMONA AVENUE, AND SOUTH OF CHURCH STREET) AS AUTHORIZED BY CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE SECTION 21107.7 RESOLUTION NO. 05-069 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE ENFORCEMENT OF THE CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE IN THE TERRA VISTA WESTGATE GATED COMMUNITY AS AUTHORIZED BY CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE SECTION 21107.7 RESOLUTION NO. 05-070 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE ENFORCEMENT OF THE CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE IN THE RANCHO VISTA GATED COMMUNITY AS AUTHORIZED BY CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE SECTION 21107.7 MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Williams to approve Resolution Nos. 05-068, 05-069 and 05- 070. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. II I. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS I I1. CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FROM GRANITE EQUITIES (DEVELOPERS OF HENDERSON CREEK PROJECT) TO HAVE THE CITY DESIGNATE HABITAT TRUST AS A QUALIFIED CONSERVATION ENTITY FOR THE PURPOSE OF THE MANAGING 54 ACRES OF OPEN SPACF PURSUANT TO AN OPEN SPACE TRANSFER PLAN IN SATISFACTION OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR THF HENDERSON CREEK PROJECT (CONTINUED FROM FEBRUARY 2, 2005) City Council Minutes February 16, 2005 Page 10 A staff report was presented by Larry Henderson, Principal Planner. James Markman, City Attorney, stated his staff worked with the Planning staff to develop this Resolution. He proceeded to give background information about the Habitat Trust wanting this matter to be heard by the Council. He stated the recommendation is not to designate them as a qualified manager of this property based on the findings in the Resolution. He stated he went to the Secretary of State's website and found that the Habitat Trust for Wildlife business portal indicates their corporation is suspended. He recommended staff approve the Resolution. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public input. Addressing the City Council was: Craig Sherman, on behalf of the Habitat Trust and Spirit of the Sage Council, stated he did not agree with Mr. Markman's comments. He stated they are not unqualified to manage this open space. He referenced a letter previously sent to the Council, which is on file in the City Clerk's office. He stated depending on the action taken tonight, the Council should be prepared to pay his client for the loss of their rights. There being no further input, public comments were closed. James Markman, City Attorney, stated prior to the adoption of Council Resolution 04-207, it specifically gave the City a function of having to approve "other qualified conservation entities." He stated we never had such a function in the past. He stated when this was given to his office in this circumstance, logical criteria is being presented to the Council and applied to this process. He continued talking about the criteria as it relates to the Habitat Trust. He felt the information presented supports the Resolution. He advised the Council not to feel intimidated by Mr. Sherman's threats. RESOLUTION NO. 05-071 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING CRITERIA FOR THE DESIGNATION OF CONSERVATION ENTITIES TO MANAGE OPEN SPACE AND HABITAT TRANSFER LANDS, AND MAKING A DETERMINATION ON A REQUEST BY GRANITE EQUITIES (DEVELOPERS OF HENDERSON CREEK PROJECT) REGARDING THE QUALIFICATIONS OF THE CONSERVATION ENTITY TO MANAGE OPEN SPACE AND HABITAT TRANSFER LANDS REQUIRED BY THE HENDERSON CREEK PROJECT; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF MOTION: Moved by Michael, seconded by Williams to approve Resolution No. 05-071. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. 12. STATUS REPORT ON FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT (Oral) A staff report and power point presentation were given by Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, and Maria Perez, Associate Engineer. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated Ms. Perez has done a good job on this. ACTION: Report received and filed. City Council Minutes February 16, 2005 Page '11 Il a. COuNCiL BUSINESS I 31. DISCUSSION OF DOG BREEDING ISSUE (STEVE KNEGHT) Councilmember Gutierrez stated when this was brought up previously, the family involved was not present. He added he takes responsibility that they were not present. He stated he has brought this back because he feels everyone has the right to have their day in court. He felt people have the right to face their accuser. He did not feel it was right for people to be spied upon and being watched from peeking over fences. Brad Buller, City Planner, displayed a view of the back of the property stating the Knecht's have no neighbors behind them or near their properly. He stated this properly is quite remote. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he does not want to be argumentative and that he wants to be united with his colleagues. He stated CUP's are there to allow special permission. He stated he did not feel this type of issue has ever been brought up in the 25 years the City has been incorporated. He felt the Knecht's are decent people and are not backyard breeders. He stated this business is not to create profit for the Knecht's. He stated there is a section in the code that refers to animal care facilities in a very Iow residential areas. He stated this would include grooming, housing, medium care or overnight or shod term housing. He felt the Knecht's should be able to get a CUP as an animal care facility and hoped his colleagues would support this. He stated if someone is allowed to have 6 horses on their property, why not 6 dogs. He made comments on what other cities allow. He felt the Knecht's should be able to apply for a CUP under animal care. James Markman, City Attorney, stated this is not a use determination because there is no way you can interpret the language to allow someone to engage in a dog breeding operation for themselves in a very Iow zone. He stated dog breeding is a use, an activity. He stated an animal care facility is a facility which is a commercial facility that offers a variety of services to people's animals should the general public wants to take advantage of it. He stated the way to change this is through an Ordinance amendment that would allow dog breeding for a cedain number of dogs in the very Iow zone on lots of a cedain size or greater under a Conditional Use Permit. He stated then the Knecht's could be processed. Councilmember Williams questioned Brad Buller about the requirements for horses on property and noted how much open space is required. Mayor Alexander stated this is about consistency. He felt the Knecht's should have got the approval before they started their business, not after the fact. He stated they are out of compliance. He stated he agrees with the Planning Commission and did not think things should be changed. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council were: John Lyons, Etiwanda, did not feel the Knecht's want to be bothered. He stated nobody cares what they are doing and that they should be left alone. He stated it is their property and they should be able to do what they want to. Nicole Myerchin wanted to know if someone should be able to have an elephant in a remote area. She stated Golden Retriever Rescue has offered to take care of these animals. She stated this is a matter of setting a precedent. She stated this has been voted against twice. She stated now that Councilmember Michael is back they hope that he will bring the vote the right way. She felt this will hurt the community and hoped the Council will stand by their 60 day notice to the Knecht's. A lady who did not identify herself stated the strict zoning is what makes this City special. She stated we do not want to have a lot of grooming facilities, hotels, etc. for animals. She hoped if changes are made to the CUP that they be required to be spayed or neutered. City Council Minutes February 16, 2005 Page 12 Denise McGuire stated they just purchased a puppy and talked about the good experience it was. She felt that the City should make sure breeders are doing the right things with their facilities and running a good operation. She did not feel all breeders should be labeled as bad. Nancy Avila stated she felt if someone could have 6 horses on their properly, they should be allowed to have 6 dogs. She felt the Knecht's are doing this because of their love for the dogs...not for profit. She felt these dogs are cared for. She felt the Knecht's are keeping their family together if they can keep the dogs. David (did not give last name) stated he is a teenager and did not feel the dogs should be taken away from their family. He stated he takes care of his animals and does the best he can. He did not feel their dogs should be taken away from them. Mrs. Knecht distributed information for the City Council and also a picture of one of their show dogs. She stated most everyone has already related everything she was going to say. She told about her breeding business and the facility they have for the dogs. She stated they are not backyard breeders. She continued to talk about their operation. She stated they have a waiting list of people that want their dogs. She stated they do have an acre and 1/8, which is about 50,000 square feet of property. Matt Bender commented on having horses as opposed to dogs and felt someone should be able to have the same number of dogs as horses on properly. Robin Cochrane brought a puppy. She stated she got her dog from the Knecht's as a gift. She felt there was a high need for good breeders. She stated this dog is a service dog and felt the Knecht's should be allowed to continue with what they are doing. Elizabeth Cochrane also commented on service dogs and the need for them. She felt the service these breeders provide is very important. A lady (did not identify herself) stated she is glad the Knecht's are helping people, but that they are only allowed to have three dogs. She did not feel an exception should be granted because then everyone would be doing this. There being no further input, the public hearing was closed. Councilmember Spagnolo stated he spoke to the Knecht's and that no one has ever said they do not have a good facility. He stated the issue is the regulations of the City that should be followed. Councilmember Michael stated the City does care about animals and that the issue for him is that they should maintain the quality of life in the City. He felt if the codes are modified, some of the things in the community will be affected. He stated he is not compelled to make a modification to the codes. He felt they should be given a certain amount of time to get rid of the animals to get down to three dogs. Councilmember Williams felt the Knecht's need to come into compliance. She felt the animal ordinance needs to be looked at. She felt the law needs to stay as is and the Knecht's should be given enough time so they can comply. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he has done his best for the Knecht's. He stated this issue has not come to the City Council in the 25 years of its existence. He felt people should be compassionate. He stated he hoped there could be flexibility for these people and that he would support looking at the ordinance regulating animals. MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez to draft an Ordinance, which would allow dog breeding as a condition in the very Iow zone with specific parameters with a minimum one acre lot size. The motion died due to lack of a second. City Council Minutes February 16, 2005 Page 13 The City Council recessed at 9:06 p.m. They reconvened at 9:18 p.m. with all members present and discussion of item H1. J2. PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATF ACTION: Report received and filed. J3. REPORT BY ANIMAL SHELTER AD HOC SUBCOMMITTEE A staff report was presented by Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst II1. Mayor Alexander stated he would like to put a time frame on the fourth directive which is "having staff solicit cost estimates and proposals from professional consultants and providers to advise the City regarding the feasibility of establishing a "no kill" shelter." He stated he would like to limit the timeframe to find people to one month so this is not delayed anymore. He stated if there are fees involved he would like to present that information within two weeks to one month for approval. Councilmember Spagnolo stated he has had various phone conversations with many animal groups discussing running the shelter more efficiently. He stated they will be setting up meetings with them. He stated they are on a fact finding mission right now so they have a way to base decisions to be made. He felt this is a very dynamic situation. Councilmember Williams asked the timeframe when the information can be expected once the consultant is chosen and what would be the next timeframe for the reports to be completed. Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst III, stated the City and the County of San Bernardino have an existing contract with the Humane Society of the United States to provide a consultation to us regarding the existing programs at the animal shelter. She stated the timeframe for that report is they will begin to solicit public comment probably during the first week or two in March. She stated the Human Society consultant will not come out until June to do the site visit. She stated we can expect their final report to the City Council in September. She stated the Subcommittee is requesting another consultation regarding the feasibility of establishing a "no kill shelter" in Rancho Cucamonga. She stated staff can come back in a month's time for the Subcommittee to make a recommendation to the Council. She stated it depends on whom staff finds to do the services and what their schedule is in order to establish when that report will be completed. Councilmember Michael congratulated the work the subcommittee has done. He asked if there was a way to track the number of people that find their pets by accessing it on the Peffinders website. Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst III, felt this could be done. Councilmember Michael felt the City Council needs to identify what tevel of service they expect and what that cost would be. Councilmember Gutierrez congratulated the subcommittee on their work. He hoped this could be incorporated into the budget. He stated he looks forward to discussing this during the future goal setting meetings. He inquired about HOPE running the shelter. Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst III, stated the subcommittee did not pursue this option. She did not feel they could. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public input. Addressing the City Council were: City Council Minutes February 16, 2005 Page 14 A lady (who did not identify herself) had information on "no kill shelters" for Councilmembers Gutierrez, Michael and Williams. She stated they have a petition for a "no kill shelter." She stated there is no veterinary care and hoped they could get some soon. A lady (did not give her name) felt the San Bernardino County Animal Shelter contract should be dumped. She stated it is not going to work by using their contract. Elizabeth, volunteer for "Cats in Need of Care," told about their services. She stated the County does not provide veterinary care at the shelter. She did not think the shelter should be a death house. She asked the City to consider Nathan Winegrad's suggestion of a "no kill shelter." Ted Myerchin thanked Nicole for assisting the seniors at Christmas. He thanked the Counci~ for their work towards the animal shelter. He did not think there should be unnecessary killing of pets. He stated he visited the Helen Woodward Shelter and hoped Rancho Cucamonga's could be like that some day. Nicole Myerchin thanked Councilmembers Michael, Williams and Spagnolo and also Mayor Alexander for their "no vote" on the Knecht issue. She hoped that the Council will accept the recommendations presented tonight. Jody Bell felt Nathan Winegrad would be great to work with. She encouraged the Council to go to a "no kill shelter." She quoted the website of nokillnow.com. Ronnie Nunez, volunteer for Cats in Need, felt there should be a "no kill shelter." Steve Harris felt there should be improvements made at the animal shelter. Jena, volunteer for Cats in Need, stated she supports the "no kill shelter." Mayor Alexander felt no animal 8 weeks old should leave the shelter without being spayed or neutered. Councilmember Michael stated he is in favor of partnerships and felt the County contract should be evaluated. He stated he is encouraged by the amount of participation regarding this issue. He stated he supports the recommendation presented. Councilmember Williams stated she supports the recommendation. She asked that there be study sessions with all of the City Councilmembers involved in these discussions. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he supports the recommendations. MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Spagn01o to approve the Subcommittee's recommendations. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. II K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR THE NEXT MEETING I K1. Alexander asked that the reconsideration of appointments to SANBAG/Omnitrans be placed on the next agenda for discussion. City Council Minutes February 16, 2005 Page 15 II n. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS I No communication was made from the public. Il M. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Gutierrez to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 10:55 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: * February 22, 2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Special MeetinR A. CA£ TO ORDER A special meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Tuesday, February 22, 2005, in the Training Room of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor William J. Alexander called the meeting to order at 2:05 p.m. Present were Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, L. Dennis Michael, Sam Spagnolo, Diane Williams and Mayor William J. Alexander. Aisc present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Director; Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director; Tamara Layne, Finance Officer; James C. Frost, City Treasurer; Brad Buller, City Planner; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Trang Huynh, Building Official; Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director; Deborah Clark, Library Director; Captain Pete Ortiz, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; Deputy Fire Chief Mike Bell, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst III, Kimbedy Thomas, Management Analyst Ill; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. [[ B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS No communication was made from the public. [I C. ITEM(S) OF BUSINESS C1. CITY COUNCIL DISCUSSION AND CONSIDERATION OF ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS, CONSENSUS BUILDING AND PRIORITIES The meeting was led by facilitator, Geoff Ball with Geoff Ball & Associates. Mr. Ball reviewed discussions that took place on February 11 and 12, 2005. He also referred to the City Council Mission Statement 2005 that was discussed at these meetings. MOTION: Moved by Michael, seconded by Spagnolo to approve the Mission Statement 2005 as modified. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. The City Council agreed to put their Mission Statement on the wall in the Council Chambers. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated this could also go on the City's website and other City publications. Councilmember Spagnolo suggested this be put on the television screen prior to the start of Council meetings. Special City Council Minutes February 22, 2005 Page 2 The City Council reviewed the list of existing priorities and projects, as well as considered and prioritized potential, additional projects. The Councilmembers individually ranked the proposed priorities. These rankings, at this point, were made irrespective of the financial cost. The rankings were then tabulated by Mr. Ball to develop an averaged ranking from the five individual rankings. The City council agreed to meet again on February 28 to complete discussions.. The meeting adjourned at 6:15 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved:* February 24, 2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Special Meeting [ A. CALL TO ORDER A special meeting of the Rancho Cucamon§a City Gouncil was held on Thursday, February 24, 2005, in the Tri Communitias Room of the Civic Genter located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamon§a, California. Mayor William J. Alexander called the meeting to order at 11:30 a.m. Present were Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, L. Dennis Michael, Sam Spagnolo, Diane Williams and Mayor William J. Alexander. Also present were: Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager; and Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst III. No communication was made from the public. II c. ITEM(S) OF BUS1NESS I C1. MEETING WITH CONGRESSMAN DREIER AS HE VISITS RANCHO The City Council met with Congressman Dreier to discuss issues relating to the City. The meeting adjourned at 1:20 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: * February 28, 2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Special Meeting A special meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Monday, February 28, 2005, in the Training Room of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor William J. Alexander called the meeting to order at 2:40 p.m. Present were Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, L. Dennis Michael, Sam Spagnolo, Diane Williams and Mayor William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Director; Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director; Tamara Layne, Finance Officer; Brad Buller, City Planner; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Trang Huynh, Building Official; Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director; Deborah Clark, Library Director; Captain Pete Ortiz, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; Fire Chief Peter Bryan, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst III, Kimberly Thomas, Management Analyst III; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. [[ t~. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS No communication was made from the public. [ C. ITEM(S) OF BUSINESS O1. CITY COUNCIL DISCUSSION AND CONSIDERATION OF ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS, CONSENSUS BUILDING AND PRIORITIER Jack Lam, City Manager, mentioned the City Council agenda had been revised as was previously agreed upon at a prior goal setting workshop. The City Council continued to review the priorities and rankings presented to them at the February 22°d meeting. The Council agreed to the rankings of the new priorities with the understanding that staff would bring to the Council the financial impacts of each of the added priorities. After the Council reviews the financial cost and impacts of the priorities, they may change how the projects are prioritized. Special City Council Minutes February 28, 2005 Page 2 D. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 4:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debm J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: * March 2, 2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Special Meetinq A. CALL TO ORDER A special meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, March 2, 2005, at the Police Department of the Civic Center located at 10510 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor William J. Alexander called the meeting to order at 4:00 p.m. Present were Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, L. Dennis Michael, Sam Spagnolo, Diane Williams and Mayor William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; and Captain Pete Odiz, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department. I[ B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS I No communication was made from the public. II c. ITEM(S) OF BUSINESS I C1. TOUR OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA POLICE DEPARTMENT BUILDING The City Council toured the new addition to the Police Building. I D. ADJOURNMENT I The meeting adjourned at 5:00 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: * CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/24/2005 through 3/8/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00220263 2/24/2005 US POSTMASTER 7,500.00 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 310.38 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 355.23 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 446.08 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 456.43 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 35.98 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 383.98 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER D/STRICT 95.43 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 54.38 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 106.83 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 164.43 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 121.78 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 119.48 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 35.98 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 77.03 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLE,y~ATER DISTRICT 94.28 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 48.63 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 107.98 A~ - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 124.08 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 79.33 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 35.98 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 347.18 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 52.08 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 40.58 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 34.83 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 43.18 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 120.63 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 126.38 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 459.76 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 77.03 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 836.44 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 100.03 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 178.13 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 45.18 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 105.68 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 42.88 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 133.38 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 124.08 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 21.33 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 121.78 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 159.83 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 236.78 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 96.59 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 96.59 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 43.12 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 43.11 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 66.68 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 119.48 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 949.43 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 212.63 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 68.94 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 68.94 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 174.68 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: I Ct~rrent Date: 03/09/20¢ Report:CK_AGENDA PEG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: .t 07:55:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/24/2005 through 3/8/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.60 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 79.33 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 280.48 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 353.16 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 237.58 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 44.03 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 121.78 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 111.43 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 48.63 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 122.93 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 111.88 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CIJCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 203.43 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 359.83 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 105.68 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 89.68 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 129.83 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 228.83 AP ~ 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 155.23 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 55.72 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 55.71 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 117.18 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 150.53 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 155.13 AP - 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 110.38 AP 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 124.18 AP 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 197.78 AP 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 124.08 AP 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 119.58 AP 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 88.53 AP 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 142.58 AP 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 134.53 AP 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 101.18 AP 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 266.33 AP 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 380.98 AP 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 107.98 AP 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 46.33 AP 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 153.28 AP 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 169.38 AP 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 92.33 AP 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 158.58 AP 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 170.08 AP 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 234.48 AP 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 329.93 AP 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 231.03 AP 00220266 2/24/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 266.68 AP 00220268 2/24/2005 VERIZON 75.96 AP 00220268 2/24/2005 VERIZON 161.90 AP 00220268 2/24/2005 VERIZON 28.51 AP 00220268 2/24/2005 VERIZON 418.23 AP 00220268 2/24/2005 VERIZON 67.23 AP - 00220268 2/24/2005 VERIZON 113.47 AP- 00220268 2/24/2005 VERIZON 15.31 AP - 00220268 2/24/2005 VERIZON 56.71 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 2 Current Date: 03/09/20C Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:55:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/24/2005 through 3/8/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00220268 2/24/2005 VERIZON 83.42 AP - 00220268 2/24/2005 VERIZON 29.94 AP - 00220268 2/24/2005 VERLZON 29.94 AP - 00220268 2/24/2005 VERIZON 466.36 AP - 00220268 2/24/2005 VERIZON 28.51 AP - 00220268 2/24/2005 VERIZON 29.94 AP - 00220268 2/24/2005 VERIZON 56.43 AP - 00220268 2/24/2005 VERIZON 20.70 AP - 00220268 2/24/2005 VERIZON 29.18 AP - 00220268 2/24/2005 VERIZON 49.35 AP - 00220268 2/24/2005 VERIZON 43.46 AP - 00220268 2/24/2005 VERIZON 31.02 AP - 00220268 2/24/2005 VERIZON 20.70 AP - 00220268 2/24/2005 VERIZON 28.37 AP - 00220268 2/24/2005 VERIZON 20.70 AP - 00220268 2/24/2005 VERIZON 28.51 AP - 00220268 2/24/2005 VERIZON 90.55 AP - 00220268 2/24/2005 VERIZON 20.70 AP - 00220268 2/24/2005 VERIZON 90.55 AP - 00220268 2/24/2005 VERIZON 29.94 AP - 00220268 2/24/2005 VERIZON 28.94 AP - 00220268 2/24/2005 VERIZON 20.70 AP - 00220268 2/24/2005 VERIZON 88.46 AP - 00220268 2/24/2005 VERIZON 21.94 AP - 00220268 2/24/2005 VERIZON 146.52 AP - 00220268 2/24/2005 VERIZON 130.82 AP - 00220268 2/24/2005 VERIZON 29.32 AP - 00220268 2/24/2005 VERIZON 38.66 AP - 00220268 2/24/2005 VERIZON 29.55 AP - 00220268 2/24/2005 VERIZON 181.79 AP - 00220268 2/24/2005 VERIZON 20.80 AP - 00220268 2/24/2005 VERIZON 38.66 AP - 00220268 2/24/2005 VERIZON 90.55 AP - 00220268 2/24/2005 VERIZON 89.55 AP - 00220268 2/24/2005 VERIZON 90.55 AP - 00220268 2/24/2005 VERIZON 90.55 AP - 00220268 2/24/2005 VERIZON 90.55 AP - 00220268 2/24/2005 VERIZON 90.55 AP - 00220268 2/24/2005 VERIZON 90.55 AP - 00220268 2/24/2005 VERIZON 90.55 AP 00220268 2/24/2005 VERIZON 90.55 AP 00220268 2/24/2005 VERIZON 90.55 AP 00220268 2/24/2005 VERIZON 90.55 AP 00220268 2/24/2005 VERIZON 28.09 AP 00220270 2/28/2005 AIR CONTROLLED ENVIRONMENTS 3,369.17 AP 00220271 3/2/2005 AA EQUIPMENT 1,816.31 AP 00220271 3/2/2005 AA EQUIPMENT 26.80 AP 00220272 3/2/2005 ABC LOCKSMITHS 530.47 AP 00220272 3/2/2005 ABC LOCKSMITHS 180.17 AP 00220272 3/2/2005 ABC LOCKSMITHS 33.78 AP - 00220272 3/2/2005 ABC LOCKSMITHS 4.85 AP - 00220272 3/2/2005 ABC LOCKSMITHS 329.85 AP - 00220272 3/2/2005 ABC LOCKSMITHS 7.54 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 3 Current Date: 03/09/20C Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:55:zl CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/24/2005 through 3/8/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00220272 3/2/2005 ABC LOCKSMITHS 105.06 AP - 00220272 3/2/2005 ABC LOCKSMITHS 80.81 AP - 00220272 3/2/2005 ABC LOCKSMITHS 115.79 AP - 00220272 3/2/2005 ABC LOCKSMITHS 730.54 AP - 00220272 3/2/2005 ABC LOCKSMITHS 6.08 AP - 00220272 3/2/2005 ABC LOCKSMITHS 8.62 AP - 00220272 3/2/2005 ABC LOCKSMITHS 422.01 AP - 00220272 3/2/2005 ABC LOCKSMITHS 6.47 AP - 00220273 3/2/2005 ABDALLA, HODA 100.00 AP - 00220273 3/2/2005 ABDALLA, HODA 250.00 AP - 00220274 3/2/2005 ABLAC 16.39 AP - 00220275 3/2/2005 ADAMSON, RONALD 1,254.00 AP - 00220277 3/2/2005 AEF SYSTEMS CONSULTING I~C 3,487.50 AP - 00220277 3/2/2005 AEF SYSTEMS CONSULTING INC 1,150.00 AP - 00220278 3/2/2005 AIR CONTROLLED ENVIRONMENTS 138.00 AP - 00220279 3/2/2005 ALL CITIES TOOLS 147.62 AP - 00220279 3/2/2005 ALL CITIES TOOLS 225.26 AP - 00220279 3/2/2005 ALL CITIES TOOLS 191.62 AP - 00220279 3/2/2005 ALL CIT1ES TOOLS 121.76 AP - 00220280 3/2/2005 ALL WELDING 85.00' AP - 00220280 3/2/2005 ALL WELDING 2,181.94 AP - 00220283 3/2/2005 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 200.00 AP - 00220285 3/2/2005 AMERICA WEST LANDSCAPE INC 20,503.08 AP - 00220285 3/2/2005 AMERICA WEST LANDSCAPE INC -12,845.49 AP - 00220286 3/2/2005 AMERICAN ABRASIVE & TOOL INC. 51.72 AP - 00220287 3/2/2005 AMERICAN CLASSIC SANITATION INC. 179.11 AP - 00220287 3/2/2005 AMERICAN CLASSIC SANITATION INC. 155.40 AP 00220288 3/2/2005 ANGLE, TERRI 46.35 AP 00220289 3/2/2005 ARBOR NURSERY INC 123.91 AP 00220289 3/2/2005 ARBOR NURSERY INC 589.39 AP 00220291 3/2/2005 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 1,188.00 AP 00220291 3/2/2005 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 3,168.00 AP 00220291 3/2/2005 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 144.00 AP 00220291 3/2/2005 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 3,075.00 AP 00220292 3/2/2005 ASSI SECURITY 1,175.00 AP 00220292 3/2/2005 ASSI SECURITY 3,349.00 AP 00220292 3/2/2005 ASSI SECURITY 1,175.00 AP - 00220292 3/2/2005 ASSI SECURITY 615.00 AP - 00220292 3/2/2005 ASSI SECURITY 3,348.59 AP - 00220293 3/2/2005 ASTRUM UTILITY SERVICES 13,945.00 AP - 00220294 3/2/2005 AUDITOR/CONTROLLER-RECORDER SAN BERIX 6.50 AP - 00220295 3/2/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 101.02 AP - 00220295 3/2/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 51.72 AP - 00220295 3/2/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE -268.84 AP - 00220295 3/2/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 166.28 AP - 00220295 3/2/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 126.52 AP - 00220295 3/2/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 84.35 AP - 00220295 3/2/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 33.26 AP - 00220295 3/2/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 434.54 AP - 00220295 3/2/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 9.00 AP - 00220295 3/2/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 954.64 AP - 00220295 3/2/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 1,346.88 AP - 00220295 3/2/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 71.56 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 4 Current Date: 03/09/20C Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time~.,~ 07:55:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/24/2005 through 3/8/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00220295 3/2/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 147.92 AP - 00220298 3/2/2005 BENGTZEN, WANDA 200.00 AP - 00220298 3/2/2005 BENGTZEN, WANDA 115.00 AP - 00220301 3/2/2005 BISHOP COMPANY 466.15 AP - 00220301 3/2/2005 BISHOP COMPANY 64.89 AP - 00220301 3/2/2005 BISHOP COMPANY 759.27 AP - 00220302 3/2/2005 BRIAN WEST 1,000.00 AP - 00220304 3/2/2005 BUBALO CONSTRUCTION CO,STEVE 374.47 AP - 00220304 3/2/2005 BUBALO CONSTRUCTION CO,STEVE 23,237.53 AP - 00220305 3/2/2005 BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC 440.00 AP - 00220305 3/2/2005 BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC 4,133.80 AP - 00220306 3~2/2005 CAL PERS LONG TERM CARE 315.92 AP - 00220307 3/2/2005 CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES 70,587.74 AP - 00220308 3/2/2005 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 103.50 AP - 00220308 3/2/2005 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 76.87 AP - 00220308 3/2/2005 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 539.63 AP - 00220309 3/2/2005 CALSENSE 161.63 AP - 00220310 3/2/2005 CAMERON WELDING SUPPLY 36.42 AP - 00220311 3/2/2005 CARINO, CHERYL 250.00 AP - 00220312 3/2/2005 CDW GOVERNMENT 1NC. 193.00 AP - 00220313 3/2/2005 CELLULAR WAREHOUSE #324 27.87 AP - 00220314 3/2/2005 CITY RENTALS 405.10 AP - 002203 I5 3/2/2005 CLABBY, SANDRA 1,000.00 AP - 00220316 3/2/2005 CLAIREMONT EQUIPMENT 416.68 AP - 00220317 3/2/2005 CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. 89.18 AP - 00220317 3/2/2005 CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. 49.21 AP - 00220317 3/2/2005 CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. 69.35 AP - 00220317 3/2/2005 CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. 51.67 AP - 00220317 3/2/2005 CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. 76.57 AP - 00220319 3/2/2005 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 22.97 AP - 00220319 3/2/2005 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 5.65 AP - 00220322 3/2/2005 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS ] 563.10 AP - 00220323 3/2/2005 CONSOLIDATED PLASTICS 461.98 AP - 00220324 3/2/2005 CONTRERAS, CHERYL 250.00 AP - 00220325 3/2/2005 CORONA CLAY COMPANY 1,198.72 AP - 00220327 3/2/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 990.00 AP - 00220328 3/2/2005 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 700.38 AP - 00220328 3/2/2005 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 3,986.75 AP - 00220328 3/2/2005 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 717.62 AP - 00220328 3/2/2005 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 666.98 AP - 00220328 3/2/2005 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 252.14 AP - 00220328 3/2/2005 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 374.97 AP - 00220328 3/2/2005 D AND K CONCRETE COMIVANY 969.75 AP ~ 00220328 3/2/2005 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 1,297.35 AP - 00220328 3/2/2005 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 374.97 AP - 00220328 3/2/2005 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 210.12 AP - 00220328 3/2/2005 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 565.69 AP - 00220328 3/2/2005 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 1,995.53 AP - 00220328 3/2/2005 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 2,409.29 AP - 00220328 3/2/2005 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 344.80 AP - 00220329 3/2/2005 DAL TILE CORPORATION 111.19 AP - 00220330 3/2/2005 DAPPER TIRE CO 731.87 AP - 00220331 3/2/2005 DATA QUICK 93.50 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 5 Current Date: 03/09/20C Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time' ~.~ 07:55:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/24/2005 through 3/8/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00220332 3/2/2005 DAWSON, MICHELLE 33.00 AP - 00220333 3/2/2005 DE LEISE, JENAE 519.24 AP - 00220334 3/2/2005 DELTA DENTAL 31,707.44 AP - 00220335 3/2/2005 DEMCO 1NC 60.03 AP - 00220336 3/2/2005 DENTAL HEALTH SERVICES 82.80 AP - 00220337 3/2/2005 DEPARTMENT OF PESTICIDE REGULATION 90.00 AP - 00220338 3/212005 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 11,900.00 AP - 00220339 3/2/2005 DIRECTV 31.49 AP - 00220342 3/2/2005 ELECTRIC MOTOR INDUSTRIES INC. 407.05 AP - 00220343 3/2/2005 ELECTRONICS WAREHOUSE 14.00 AP - 00220344 3/2/2005 EMPIRE MOBILE HOME SERVICE 6,495.00 AP - 00220347 3/2/2005 ESGIL CORPORATION 11,056.92 AP - 00220348 3/2/2005 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 997.25 AP - 00220348 3/2/2005 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 272.66 AP - 00220348 3/2/2005 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 465.48 AP - 00220348 3/2/2005 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 712.53 AP - 00220349 3/2/2005 EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY 63.57 AP - 00220349 3/2/2005 EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY 85.58 AP - 00220349 312/2005 EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY 88.03 AP - 00220350 3/212005 F S MOTOR SPORTS INC 175.00 AP - 00220351 3/2/2005 FASTENAL COMPANY 185.43 AP - 00220351 3/2/2005 FASTENAL COMPANY 21.93 AP - 00220351 3/2/2005 FASTENAL COMPANY 29.10 AP - 00220351 3/2/2005 FASTENAL COMPANY 79.58 AP - 00220351 3/2/2005 FASTENAL COMPANY 85.55 AP - 00220352 3/2/2005 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 8.49 AP - 00220352 3/2/2005 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 11.48 AP - 00220352 3/2/2005 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 8.49 AP - 00220352 3/2/2005 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 18.90 AP - 00220352 3/2/2005 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 18.90 AP - 00220352 3/2/2005 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 26.83 AP - 00220352 3/2/2005 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 13.39 AP - 00220352 3/2/2005 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 8.58 AP - 00220353 3/2/2005 FENCE CRAFT OF UPLAND INC 27.58 AP - 00220354 3/2/2005 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 610.86 AP - 00220354 3/2/2005 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 627.15 AP - 00220355 3/2/2005 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 612.00 AP - 00220355 3/2/2005 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 840.00 AP - 00220355 3/2/2005 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 840.00 AP - 00220355 3/2/2005 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 868.00 AP - 00220355 3/2/2005 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 500.00 AP - 00220355 3/2/2005 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 510.00 AP ~ 00220355 3/2/2005 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 960.00 AP - 00220355 3/2/2005 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 346.30 AP - 00220355 3/2/2005 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 629.00 AP - 00220356 3/2/2005 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 442.19 AP - 00220357 3/2/2005 FLORES, CHRISTINE 75.00 AP - 00220358 3/2/2005 FORD OF UPLAND INC 29.65 AP - 00220358 3/2[2005 FORD OF UPLAND INC 55.00 AP - 00220360 3/2/2005 FULLMER CONSTRUCTION 15,000.00 AP - 00220361 3/2/2005 G AND M BUSINESS INTERIORS 5,817.14 AP - 00220363 3/2/2005 GENESIS CM 100,000.00 AP - 00220364 3/2/2005 GEORAL INTERNATIONAL 165.00 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 6 Current Date: 03/09/20C Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: j 07:55:,~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/24/2005 through 3/8/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00220365 3/2/2005 GIORDANO, MARIANNA 160.00 AP - 00220366 3/2/2005 GLEDSON, GEORGE 2,014.00 AP - 00220367 3/2/2005 GOLD'N WEST SURPLUS 781.00 AP - 00220368 3/2/2005 GOLF VENTURES WEST 21.67 AP - 00220368 3/2/2005 GOLF VENTURES WEST 104.71 AP - 00220369 3/2/2005 GRAINGER, WW 655.25 AP - 00220369 3/2/2005 GRAINGER, WW 325.82 AP - 00220369 3/2/2005 GRAINGER, W~V 142.27 AP - 00220369 3/2/2005 GRAINGER, WW 34.76 AP - 00220370 3/2/2005 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 332.35 AP - 00220372 3/2/2005 GRUENEICH RESOURCE ADVOCATES 3,780.95 AP - 00220373 3/2/2005 HAAKER EQIJIPMENT CO 1,204.24 AP ~ 00220375 3/2/2005 HEWITT, DEBORAH 112.00 AP - 00220376 3/2/2005 HILL, GREGORY 211.97 AP - 00220377 3/2/2005 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 242.98 AP - 00220377 3/2/2005 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO [NC 9,594.69 AP - 00220379 3/2/2005 HOLT'S AUTO ELECTRIC INC 334.03 AP - 00220380 3/2/2005 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 34.03 AP - 00220380 3/2/2005 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 42.02 AP - 00220380 3/2/2005 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 38.19 AP - 00220380 3/2/2005 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 5.93 AP - 00220380 3/2/2005 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 64.19 AP - 00220380 3/2/2005 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 104.31 AP - 00220380 3/2/2005 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 38.69 AP - 00220380 3/2/2005 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 82.31 AP - 00220380 3/2/2005 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 126.09 AP - 00220380 3/2/2005 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 367.41 AP - 00220380 3/2/2005 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 187.92 AP 00220380 3/2/2005 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 91.40 AP 00220380 3/2/2005 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 288.54 AP 00220380 3/2/2005 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 27.69 AP 00220381 3/2/2005 HORTON INC, D R 2,168.73 AP 00220382 3/2/2005 HOSE MAN INC 17.93 AP 00220382 3/2/2005 HOSE MAN [NC 41.23 AP 00220383 3/2/2005 HOYT LUMBER CO., SM 244.38 AP 00220384 3/2/2005 HUB CONSTRUCTION SPECIALITIES [NC 452.55 AP 00220385 3/2/2005 HIJMANE SOCIETY OF SAN BERNARDINO VALI 125.00 AP 00220386 3/2/2005 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 17.82 AP 00220386 3/2/2005 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 13.22 AP 00220386 3/2/2005 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 53.00 AP 00220386 3/2/2005 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 53.00 AP - 00220386 3/2/2005 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 26.84 · AP - 00220386 3/2/2005 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS [NC 44.60 AP - 00220386 3/2/2005 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 516.87 AP - 00220386 3/2/2005 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 33.94 AP - 00220386 3/2/2005 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 92.13 AP - 00220386 3/2/2005 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 360.19 AP - 00220387 3/2/2005 IMPERIAL OUTDOOR LIVING INC 281.50 AP - 00220390 3/2/2005 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 96.60 AP - 00220392 3/2/2005 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 60.22 AP - 00220392 3/2/2005 INTERSTATE BATTERIES -20.68 AP - 00220393 3/2/2005 INTRAVAIA ROCK AND SAND [NC 465.57 AP - 00220393 3/2/2005 1NTRAVAIA ROCK AND SAND INC 260.00 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 7 Current Date: 03/09/20C Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time'~ ~- 07:55:4 7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/24/2005 through 3/8/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00220393 3/2/2005 INTRAVAIA ROCK AND SAND INC 60.00 AP - 00220394 3/2/2005 J J KELLER AND ASSOC INC 352.23 AP - 00220395 3/2/2005 J M CARDEN SPRINKLER CO INC 634.40 AP - 00220396 3/2/2005 JACKSON, MICHELLE 55.00 AP - 00220397 3/2/2005 JONES AND MAYER LAW OFFICES OF 1,612.50 AP - 00220397 3/2/2005 JONES AND MAYER LAW OFFICES OF 750.00 AP - 00220398 3/2/2005 JONES, BOB 1,920.00 AP - 00220399 3/2/2005 JORIS, CYNTHIA 47.00 AP - 00220400 3/2/2005 KELLY EQUIPMENT 179.53 AP - 00220401 3/2/2005 KOCH MATERIALS COMPANY 277.46 AP - 00220402 3/2/2005 KORAN'DA CONSTRUCTION 6,255.00 AP - 00220403 3/2/2005 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY INC 173.93 AP - 00220404 3/2/2005 LAIRD CONSTRUCTION CO 225.40 AP - 00220404 3/2/2005 LAIRD CONSTRUCTION CO 1,094.80 AP - 00220405 3/2/2005 LAM, JACK 200.00 AP - 00220406 3/2/2005 LANCE SOLL AND LUNGHARD 14,980.25 AP - 00220406 3/2/2005 LANCE SOLL AND LUNGHARD 5,916.22 AP - 00220407 3/2/2005 LEAGUE OF CALIPORNIA CITIES 35.00 AP - 00220407 3/2/2005 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 35.00 AP - 00220407 3/2/2005 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 35.00 AP - 00220408 3/2/2005 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 40.00 AP - 00220408 3/2/2005 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 3,885.00 AP - 00220409 3/2/2005 LOS ANGELES COCA COLA BTL CO 594.44 AP - 00220412 3/2/2005 LUNDSTROM, SUE 20.00 AP - 00220413 3/2/2005 MANSUR, DEBBI 250.00 AP - 00220414 3/2/2005 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 17,714.63 AP - 00220414 3/2/2005 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 124.63 AP - 00220414 3/2/2005 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 8,398.60 AP - 00220414 3/2/2005 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 17,618.60 AP - 00220414 3/2/2005 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 124.63 AP - 00220414 3/2/2005 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 8,398.60 AP - 00220414 3/2/2005 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 3,514.87 AP - 00220414 3/2/2005 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 4,842.27 AP - 00220414 3/2/2005 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 1,205.51 AP - 00220414 3/2/2005 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 8,287.69 AP - 00220414 3/2/2005 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 2,768.76 AP - 00220414 3/2/2005 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 3,514.87 AP - 00220414 3/2/2005 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 4,842.27 AP - 00220414 3/2/2005 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 1,205.51 AP - 00220414 3/2/2005 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 8,287.69 AP - 00220414 3/2/2005 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 2,768.76 AP - 00220414 3/2/2005 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 3,870.00 AP - 00220415 3/2/2005 MARK CHRIS INC 61.42 AP - 00220415 3/2/2005 MARK CHRIS INC 74.55 AP - 00220415 3/2/2005 MARK CHRIS INC 61.42 AP - 00220416 3/2/2005 MARSHALL PLUMBING 414.00 AP - 00220416 3/2/2005 MARSHALL PLUMBING -103.50 AP - 00220416 3/2/2005 MARSHALL PLUMBING 642.89 AP - 00220416 3/2/2005 MARSHALL PLUMB ING -160.72 AP - 00220416 3~2/2005 MARSHALL PLUMBING 640.89 AP - 00220416 3/2/2005 MARSHALL PLUMBING -160.22 AP - 00220416 3/2/2005 MARSHALL PLUMBING 536.79 AP - 00220416 3/2/2005 MARSHALL PLUMBING -134.19 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 8 Current Date: 03/09/20C Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time~ 07:55:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/24/2005 through 3/8/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00220416 3/2/2005 MARSHALL PLUMBING 307.50 AP - 00220416 3/2/2005 MARSHALL PLUMBING -76.87 AP - 00220416 3/2/2005 MARSHALL PLUMBING 338.00 AP - 00220416 3/2/2005 MARSHALL PLUMBING -84.50 AP - 00220417 3/2/2005 MBK HOMES LTD 15,000.00 AP - 00220419 3/2/2005 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 540.09 AP - 00220420 3/2/2005 MIERS AND MIERS 1,980.00 AP - 00220421 3/2/2005 MHAC ALARM COMPANY 545.00 AP - 00220421 3/2/2005 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 250.00 AP - 00220422 3/2/2005 MILLER, MEGHAN 65.00 AP - 00220424 3/2/2005 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 4.29 AP - 00220424 3/2/2005 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 17.9 ! AP - 00220426 3/2/2005 NAPA AUTO PARTS 142.81 AP - 00220426 3/2/2005 NAPA AUTO PARTS 86.94 AP - 00220426 3/2/2005 NAPA AUTO PARTS 190.32 AP - 00220426 3/2/2005 NAPA AUTO PARTS 17.12 AP - 00220426 3/2/2005 NAPA AUTO PARTS 8.50 AP - 00220426 3/2/2005 NAPA AUTO PARTS 111.13 AP - 00220426 3/2/2005 NAPA AUTO PARTS 52.65 AP - 00220426 3/2/2005 NAPA AUTO PARTS 65.34 AP - 00220426 3/2/2005 NAPA AUTO PARTS 148.13 AP - 00220426 3/2/2005 NAPA AUTO PARTS 36.62 AP - 00220426 3/2/2005 NAPA AUTO PARTS 8.84 AP - 00220426 3/2/2005 NAPA AUTO PARTS 229.65 AP - 00220426 3/2/2005 NAPA AUTO PARTS 27.69 AP - 00220426 3/2/2005 NAPA AUTO PARTS 42.95 AP - 00220426 3/2/2005 NAPA AUTO PARTS 113.01 AP - 00220428 3/2/2005 NATIONAL DEFERRED 14,638.45 AP - 00220429 3/2/2005 NATIONS RENT 67.35 AP - 00220429 3/2/2005 NATIONS RENT 226.34 AP - 00220429 3/2/2005 NATIONS RENT 61.96 AP - 00220429 3/2/2005 NATIONS RENT 43.10 AP - 00220430 3/2/2005 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS 46.28 AP - 00220431 3~2/2005 NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEV CORP. 1,000.00 AP - 00220431 3/2/2005 NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEV CORP. 1,000.00 AP - 00220431 3/2/2005 NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEV CORP. 1,000.00 AP - 00220431 3/2/2005 NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEV CORP. 1,000.00 AP - 00220431 3/2/2005 NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEV CORP. 1,000.00 AP - 00220432 3/2/2005 O'BRIENS, CARLOS 245.00 AP - 00220433 3/2/2005 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFO 145.37 AP - 00220434 3/2/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 15.85 AP - 00220434 3/2/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 16.07 AP - 00220434 3/2/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 13.79 AP - 00220434 3/2/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 40.06 AP - 00220434 3/2/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 25.57 AP - 00220434 3/2/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 203.18 AP - 00220434 3/2/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 28.89 AP - 00220434 3/2/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 64.78 AP - 00220434 3/2/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 90.91 AP - 00220434 3/2/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 30.02 AP - 00220434 3/2/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 146.99 AP - 00220434 3/2/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 148.48 AP - 00220434 3/2/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 32.33 Usi~r: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 9 Current Date: 03/09/20C Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:~'~, 07:55:4 7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/24/2005 through 3/8/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00220434 3/2/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 14.66 AP - 00220434 3/2/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 10.19 AP - 00220434 3/2/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 1,033.54 AP - 00220434 3/2/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 203.67 AP - 00220434 3/2/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 7.67 AP - 00220434 3/2/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 139.99 AP - 00220435 3/2/2005 OFFICE MAX 1,331.79 AP - 00220436 3/2/2005 OLIVERA, EVELYN 65.00 AP - 00220437 3/2/2005 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 842.05 AP - 00220438 3/2/2005 OWEN ELECTRIC 681.94 AP - 00220439 3/2/2005 PAClFIC EQUIP AND IRRIGATION INC 1,301.23 AP - 00220440 3/2/2005 PAC1FIC REFRIGERATOR COMPANY 412.06 AP - 00220441 3/2/2005 PEP BOYS 32.90 AP ~ 00220442 3/2/2005 PEREZ, CARLOS 1,257.00 AP - 00220442 3/2/2005 PEREZ, CARLOS 57.30 AP - 00220443 3/2/2005 PERRY, LISA 50.00 AP - 00220a. a.n. 3/2/2005 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 296.55 AP - 00220444 3/2/2005 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 60.00 AP - 00220444 3/2/2005 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 433.28 AP - 00220444 3/2/2005 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 334.90 AP - 00220444 3/2/2005 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 159.00 AP - 00220444 3/2/2005 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 326.90 AP - 00220444 3/2/2005 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 115.00 AP - 00220446 3/2/2005 PHERIGO, REBECCA 7.50 AP - 00220447 3/2/2005 PIONEER MANUFACTURING 2,400.00 AP - 00220448 3/2/2005 PITNEY BOWES 266.52 AP - 00220449 3/2/2005 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 1,718.30 AP - 00220450 3/2/2005 PORT SUPPLY 52.52 AP - 00220451 3/2/2005 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION INC 173.71 AP - 00220452 3/2/2005 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 6.81 AP - 00220453 3/2/2005 QWEST 4.76 AP - 00220454 3/2/2005 RANCHO SCREEN PRINT AND EMBROIDERY 159.47 AP - 00220455 3/2/2005 RCPFA 6,150.65 AP - 00220456 3/2/2005 RED WING SHOE STORE 150.00 AP - 00220458 3/2/2005 RIDGE REALTY GROUP LLC 1,720.00 AP - 00220459 3/2/2005 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 28.22 AP - 00220459 3/2/2005 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 177.79 AP 00220459 3/2/2005 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 172.94 AP 00220459 3/2/2005 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 192.33 AP 00220459 3/2/2005 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 79.52 AP 00220460 3/2/2005 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 85.00 AP 00220460 3/2/2005 ROBLES SR. RAUL P 85.00 AP 00220460 3/2/2005 ROBLES SR. RAUL P 60.00 AP 00220460 3/2/2005 ROBLES SR. RAUL P 115.00 AP 00220460 3/2/2005 ROBLES SR. RAUL P 216.00 AP 00220460 3/2/2005 ROBLES SR. RAUL P 110.00 AP - 00220460 3/2/2005 ROBLES SR. RAUL P ! 10.00 AP - 00220460 3/2/2005 ROBLES SR. RAUL P 60.00 AP - 00220460 3/2/2005 ROBLES SR. RAUL P 60.00 AP - 00220461 3/2/2005 ROUCH, PETER A 150.00 AP - 00220462 3/2/2005 S B AND O INC 5,857.56 AP - 00220462 3/2/2005 S B AND O INC 5,200.00 AP - 00220463 3/2/2005 SADDLEBACK WATERPROOFING 81.00 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 10 Current Date: 03/09/20C Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:55:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/24/2005 through 3/8/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00220465 3/2/2005 SAN BERNARDINO CO FIRE DEPT 30.80 AP - 00220466 3/2/2005 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT 174.00 AP - 00220468 3/2/2005 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 955.00 AP - 00220469 3/2/2005 SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM CO INC 518.54 AP - 00220470 3/2/2005 SEQUEL CONTRACTORS INC 22,799.82 AP - 00220471 3/2/2005 SHOETERIA 96.96 AP - 00220471 3/2/2005 SHOETERIA 126.05 AP - 00220471 3/2/2005 SHOETERIA 137.36 AP - 00220471 3/2/2005 SHOETERIA 150.15 AP - 00220473 3/2/2005 SIGN SHOP, THE 102.15 AP - 00220473 3/2/2005 SIGN SHOP, THE 657.63 AP - 00220473 3/2/2005 SIGN SHOP, THE 123.91 AP - 00220474 3/2/2005 SILVER OAK DEVELOPMENT 1 LLC 8,370.00 AP - 00220475 3/2/2005 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 60.00 AP - 00220476 3/2/2005 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 358.27 AP - 00220476 3/2/2005 SO CAL1F GAS COMPANY 385.94 AP - 00220476 3/2/2005 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 1,007.55 AP - 00220477 3/2/2005 SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES 50.00 AP - 00220477 3/2/2005 SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES 100.00 AP - 00220477 3/2/2005 SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES 777.50 AP - 00220477 3/2/2005 SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES 852.50 AP - 00220477 3/2/2005 SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES 100.00 AP - 00220477 3/2/2005 SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES 100.00 AP - 00220478 3/2/2005 SOIL AND PLANT LABORATORY INC 718.00 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,397.37 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 65.22 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.10 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON t5.25 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.47 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 116.89 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 78.91 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 101.20 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 97.54 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.00 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1.60 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.98 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 27.02 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.78 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 61.77 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.10 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 88.20 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 112.92 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.44 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.98 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 32.85 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 86.70 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 82.32 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.50 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.08 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 58.15 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.50 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.50 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 78.01 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 11 Current Date: 03/09/20C Report:CK_AGENDA KEG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time.' . 07:55:4 / / CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/24/2005 through 3/8/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 108.98 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.87 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.75 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 105.45 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON I 18.90 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 115.85 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 115.27 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.50 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 30.86 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 89.42 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 80.33 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 102.04 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.25 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 87.55 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 121.63 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.46 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.50 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 116.25 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.37 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.60 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.50 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.00 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.10 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.00 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.76 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.00 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.99 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.26 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 212.88 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.56 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.00 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.00 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.50 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 55.11 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.79 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 27.76 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.50 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 78.83 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.50 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.50 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 60.88 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,017.21 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.36 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.98 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.48 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.50 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.09 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.60 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.50 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 60.03 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.50 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.46 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.00 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 12 Current Date: 03/09/20¢ Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time~ .,~ 07:55:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/24/2005 through 3/8/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 139.97 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 110.73 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 157.75 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.50 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 70.65 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.50 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 126.46 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.37 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.50 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.76 AP - 00220482 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.25 AP - 00220483 3/2/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,031.13 AP - 00220484 3/2/2005 SPORTEX INC 52.47 AP - 00220485 3/2/2005 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY 282.89 AP - 00220487 3/2/2005 STERLING COFI~izE SERVICE 95.13 AP - 00220487 3/2/2005 STERLING COFI~EE SERVICE 13.70 AP - 00220487 3/2/2005 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 107.50 AP - 00220487 3/2/2005 STERLING COI~I~IzE SERVICE 296.23 AP - 00220488 ' 3/2/2005 STORAGE WEST 385.90 AP - 00220489 3/2/2005 STOVER SEED COMPANY 2,629.10 AP - 00220491 3/2/2005 SUNRISE FORD 106.38 AP - 00220493 3/2/2005 SUPERIOR ROOFING CO INC 62.48 AP - 00220494 3/2/2005 T MOBILE 148.93 AP - 00220495 3/2/2005 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS 4,090.24 AP - 00220495 3/2/2005 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS 16.13 AP - 00220496 3/2/2005 TARGET 47.97 AP - 00220497 3/2/2005 TEACHERS SCHOOL SUPPLY INC 1,867.54 AP - 00220497 3/2/2005 TEACHERS SCHOOL SUPPLY INC 0.02 AP - 00220499 3/2/2005 TORRES, ANNEL 33.00 AP - 00220500 3/2/2005 TRENCH SHORING COMPANY 6,232.53 AP - 00220502 3/2/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 2,830.21 AP - 00220502 3/2/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 322.12 AP - 00220502 3/2/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 18,789.68 AP - 00220502 3/2/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 357.80 AP - 00220502 3/2/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 980.73 AP - 00220502 3/2/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 712.28 AP - 00220502 3/2/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 5,622.17 AP - 00220503 3/2/2005 UNDERGROUND TECHNOLOGY INC 706.40 AP - 00220503 3/2/2005 UNDERGROUND TECHNOLOGY INC 1,067.40 AP - 00220503 3/2/2005 UNDERGROUND TECHNOLOGY INC 722.60 AP - 00220503 3/2/2005 UNDERGROUND TECHNOLOGY INC 745.54 AP - 00220503 3/2/2005 UNDERGROUND TECHNOLOGY INC 869.20 AP - 00220503 3/2/2005 LrNDERGROUND TECHNOLOGY INC 543.00 AP - 00220503 3/2/2005 UNDERGROUND TECHNOLOGY INC 905.60 AP - 00220503 3/2/2005 UNDERGROUND TECHNOLOGY INC 475.10 AP - 00220503 3/2/2005 UNDERGROUND TECHNOLOGY INC 661.70 AP - 00220503 3/2/2005 UNDERGROUND TECHNOLOGY INC 439.50 AP - 00220503 3/2/2005 UNDERGROUND TECHNOLOGY INC 749.70 AP - 00220503 3/2/2005 UNDERGROUND TECHNOLOGY INC 829.70 AP - 00220503 3/2/2005 UNDERGROUND TECHNOLOGY INC 860.15 AP - 00220503 3/2/2005 UNDERGROUND TECHNOLOGY INC 624.55 AP - 00220505 3/2/2005 UNIFLRST UNIFORM SERVICE 40.91 AP - 00220505 3/2/2005 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 112.39 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 13 Current Date: 03/09/20C Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Tim~ I~ ,,'~ 07:55:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/24/2005 through 3/8/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00220505 3/2/2005 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 727.54 AP - 00220505 3/2/2005 UNIIalRST UNIFORM SERVICE 657.07 AP - 00220505 3/2/2005 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 746.98 AP - 00220505 3/2/2005 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 122.63 AP - 00220505 3/2/2005 UNII"IRST UNIFORM SERVICE 24.93 AP - 00220505 3/2/2005 UNLFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 86.28 AP - 00220505 3/2/2005 UN I~'IF, ST UNIFORM SERVICE 38.12 AP - 00220505 3/2/2005 UNI]elRST UNIFORM SERVICE 898.80 AP - 00220505 3/2/2005 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 686.08 AP - 00220505 3/2/2005 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 40.91 AP - 00220505 3/2/2005 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 24.56 AP - 00220505 3/2/2005 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 172.22 AP - 00220505 3/2/2005 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 40.91 AP - 00220505 3/2/2005 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 113.75 AP - 00220505 3/2/2005 UNIFIRST IJNIFORM SERVICE 24.56 AP - 00220505 3/2/2005 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 24.56 AP ~ 00220505 3/2/2005 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 27.76 AP - 00220505 3/2/2005 UNIFIRST UN1FORM SERVICE 101.20 AP - 00220506 3/2/2005 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P~ 2,743.02 AP - 00220506 3/2/2005 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P~ 32,229.00 AP - 00220507 31212005 UN fflsD RENTALS NORTHWEST INC 682.79 AP - 00220508 3/2/2005 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE 25,000.00 AP - 00220509 3/2/2005 UNITED STUDIOS OF SELF DEFENSE 294.05 AP - 00220510 3/2/2005 UNITED WAY 46.00 AP - 00220511 3/2/2005 UPS 19.74 AP - 00220511 3/2/2005 UPS 28.15 AP - 00220512 3/2/2005 VALLEY CREST NURSERY 793.68 AP - 00220514 3/2/2005 VEGABOND INN 207.60 AP - 00220515 3/2/2005 VELOCITA WIRELESS 120.37 AP - 00220515 3/2/2005 VELOCITA WIRELESS 962.95 AP - 00220515 3/2/2005 VELOCITA WIRELESS 842.58 AP - 00220515 3/2/2005 VELOCITA WIRELESS 240.74 AP - 00220515 3/2/2005 VELOCITA WIRELESS 391.20 AP - 00220515 3/2/2005 VELOCITA WIRELESS 210.65 AP - 00220515 3/2/2005 VELOCITA WIRELESS 180.55 AP - 00220515 3/2/2005 VELOCITA WIRELESS 30.09 AP - 00220515 3/2/2005 VELOCITA WIRELESS 30.09 AP - 00220516 3/2/2005 VEND LI CO 66.12 AP - 00220518 3/2/2005 VERLZON 30.19 AP - 00220518 3/2/2005 VERIZON 41.40 AP 00220518 3/2/2005 VERIZON 58.96 AP 00220518 3/2/2005 VERIZON 29.48 AP 00220518 3/2/2005 VERIZON 34.82 AP 00220518 3/2/2005 VERIZON 20.74 AP 00220518 3/2/2005 VERIZON 29.48 AP 00220518 3/2/2005 VERIZON 29.48 AP 00220518 3/2/2005 VERIZON 57.02 AP 00220518 3/2/2005 VERIZON 49.84 AP 00220518 3/2/2005 VERIZON 20.76 AP 00220518 3/2/2005 VERIZON 20.70 AP - 00220518 3/2/2005 VERIZON 22.14 AP - 00220518 3/2/2005 VERIZON 20.70 AP - 00220518 3/2/2005 VERIZON 20.70 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 14 Current Date: 03/09/20¢ Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT~RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:~ 11 07:55:4 / CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/24/2005 through 3/8/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00220518 3/2/2005 VERIZON 61.42 AP - 00220518 3/2/2005 VERIZON 28.51 AP - 00220518 3/2/2005 VERJZON 28.51 AP - 00220518 3/2/2005 VERIZON 29.18 AP - 00220518 3/2/2005 VERIZON 20.90 AP - 00220518 3/2/2005 VERJZON 28.51 AP - 00220518 3/2/2005 VERIZON 115.67 AP - 00220518 3/2/2005 VERIZON 28.51 AP - 00220518 3/2/2005 VERIZON 20.78 AP - 00220518 3/2/2005 VERIZON 28.51 AP - 00220518 3/2/2005 VERIZON 27.53 AP - 00220518 3/2/2005 VERIZON 59.25 AP - 00220518 3/2/2005 VERIZON 21.03 AP - 00220519 3/2/2005 VERMEER CALIFORNIA 539.61 AP - 00220520 3/2/2005 VIGILANCE, TERRENCE 400.00 AP - 00220521 3/2/2005 VIRTUAL PROJECT MANAGER INC 500.00 AP - 00220522 3/2/2005 VISION SERVICE PLAN CA 7,892.64 AP - 00220523 3/2/2005 VLASIC, JOHN P III 229.13 AP - 00220524 3/2/2005 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 13.06 AP - 00220524 3/2/2005 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 117.12 AP - 00220524 3/2/2005 WALTERS W]-IOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 20.74 AP - 00220524 3/2/2005 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 136.16 AP - 00220524 3/2/2005 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 14.15 AP - 00220524 3/2/2005 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 187.63 AP - 00220524 3/2/2005 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 1,127.56 AP - 00220524 3/2/2005 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 17.17 AP - 00220524 3/2/2005 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 32.71 AP - 00220525 3/2/2005 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 208.02 AP - 00220525 3/2/2005 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 14.56 AP - 00220525 3/2/2005 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 101.63 AP - 00220525 3/2/2005 WAX1E SANITARY SUPPLY 384.62 AP - 00220526 3/2/2005 WELLS FARGO BANK 583.33 AP - 00220526 3/2/2005 WELLS FARGO BANK 291.67 AP - 00220526 3/2/2005 WELLS FARGO BANK 583.33 AP - 00220526 3/2/2005 WELLS FARGO BANK 1,166.67 AP - 00220526 3/2/2005 WELLS FARGO BANK 583.33 AP - 00220526 3/2/2005 WELLS FARGO BANK 583.33 AP - 00220526 3/2/2005 WELLS FARGO BANK 583.33 AP - 00220527 3/2/2005 WEST END FAMILY COUNSELING SERVICES 10,547.30 AP - 00220528 3/2/2005 WEST END MATERIAL SUPPLY 307.08 AP - 00220528 3/2/2005 WEST END MATERIAL SUPPLY 125.98 AP - 00220529 3/2/2005 WEST PAYMENT CENTER 194.35 AP - 00220530 3/2/2005 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 56.10 AP - 00220533 3/2/2005 WILLDAN ASSOCIATES 43,140.50 AP - 00220533 3/2/2005 WILLDAN ASSOCIATES 11,250.00 AP - 00220534 3/2/2005 YORK INDUSTRIES 711.15 AP - 00220535 3/3/2005 ALLSTAR FIRE EQUIPMENT INC 13,300.66 AP - 00220536 3/3/2005 AMERICA WEST LANDSCAPE INC 12,845.49 AP - 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 114.88 AP - 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 164.43 AP - 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 24.78 AP - 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 35.98 AP - 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 97.73 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 15 Current Date: 03/09/20C Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Timer ~ 07:55:4 l CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/24/2005 through 3/8/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 46.33 AP - 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 117.18 AP - 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 119.58 AP - 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 33.68 AP - 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 110.28 AP - 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 141.33 AP - 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VAI,~EY WATER DISTRICT 482.42 AP - 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 105.78 AP - 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 33.68 AP - 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 83.93 AP - 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 77.03 AP - 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 37.13 AP - 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 128.68 AP - 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 91.98 AP - 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 194.33 AP - 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 23.63 AP - 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.58 AP - 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 228.73 AP - 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 503.58 AP - 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 654.23 AP - 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 123.03 AP - 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 154.08 AP - 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 848.58 AP - 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 64.73 AP - 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 114.88 AP - 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 116.13 AP - 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 21.33 AP - 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 123.03 AP - 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 22.48 AP - 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 128.78 AP - 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 105.78 AP - 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.58 AP - 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 79.33 AP - 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 127.53 AP - 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 127.53 AP - 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 85.08 AP - 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 112.58 AP - 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 71.28 AP - 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 29.08 AP - 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 186.18 AP - 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 78.18 AP - 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 81.98 AP 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 25.93 AP 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.93 AP 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 179.73 AP 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 38.58 AP 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 140.96 AP 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 104.98 AP - 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY, WATER DISTRICT 103.83 AP - 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 119.13 AP - 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 103.03 AP - 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 85.78 AP - 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 120.28 User: AHAWORTI-I - Ann Haworth Page: 16 Current Date: 03/09/20C Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time,: ~' 07:55:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/24/2005 through 3/8/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 106.93 AP - 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 233.33 AP - 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 39.43 AP - 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 157.43 AP - 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 155.23 AP - 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 267.83 AP - 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 405.83 AP - 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 348.33 AP - 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 622.03 AP - 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 172.38 AP - 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 153.98 AP - 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 188.48 AP - 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 166.63 AP - 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 150.08 AP - 00220539 3/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,433.64 Total for Check ID AP: 944,932.90 Total for Entity: 944,932.90 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 17 Current Date: 03/09/20C Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time3 ~-~, 07:55:4 / ! City of Rancho Cucamonga City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary February 28, 2005 Par Market Book % of Days to YTM Y'FM Investments Value Value Value Porffoflo Term Maturity 360 Equiv. 365 Equiv. Local Agency Investment Fund 22,451,357.92 22,451,357.92 22,451,357.92 13.19 1 1 2.336 2.368 Certificates of Deposit/Neg. - Bank 1,515,000.00 1,506,501.30 1,515,000.00 0.89 733 181 2.150 2.180 Federal Agency Issues - Coupon 125,750,000.00 123,218,652.33 125,688,175.00 73.83 1,488 1 ,(X~ 3.139 3.182 Treasu~ Securities - Coupon 5,000,000.00 4,946,875.00 4,985,546.88 2.93 1,070 805 3.184 3.229 Investment Agreements 15,600,000.00 15,600,000.00 15,600,000.00 9.16 1 I 3.682 3.733 Investments 170,316,357.92 167,723,386.55 170,240,079.80 100.00% 1,137 770 3.075 3.118 Cash and Accrued Interest Passbook/Checking 136,958.48 136,958.48 136,958.48 I 1 0.493 0.500 (not included in yield calculations) Accrued Interest at Purchase 113.33 113.33 Subtotal 137,071.81 137,071,81 Total Cash and Investments 170,453,316.40 167,860,458.36 170,377,151.61 1,137 770 3.075 3.118 Total Earnings February 28 Month Ending Fiscal Year TO Date Current Year 432,836.88 3,463,046.97 Average Daily Balance 172,488,316.89 169,401,934.24 Effective Rate of Return 3.27% 3.07% I certify that this report accurately reflects all City pooled investments and is in comformity with the investment policy adopted October 6, 2004. A copy of the investment policy is available in the Administrative Services Department. '~he Investment Program herein shown provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet the next six months estimated expenditures. The month-end market values were obtained from (IDC)-Interactive Data Corporation pricing sen/ice. The attached Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents as of the prior month's end is provided under the City official Investment Policy. The provisions of the individual bond documents govern the management of these funds. On October 21,2004 the City entered into a investment Agreement with Aegon/Transamerica in the amount of $15,600,000. 'r~e Investment Agreement will earn interest at 6.00% per annum through June 28, 2006 to provide funding for specific expenditures during that podod. Beginning June 29, 2006 through October 21, 2009, the Investment Agreement w~ll esm intetast at 2~.1%. '[h~-~erege annual rate of rstum over the five year 0eriod is 3.682% which is incorporated in the annual rate of retum noted above. Jame(~ j~ C. Fro/~, Treasurer Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 03~/2005 - 10:05 PM (PRF_PM1) SymRept V6.21 City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Page Portfolio Details - Inv6stments February 28, 2005 A~erage Purchase Stated YTM Days to Maturity CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 360 Maturity Date Local Agency Investment Fund SYS00<X)5 00005 LOCAL AGENCY iNVST FUND 22,451.357.92 22,451,357.92 22,451,357.92 2.368 2.336 1 Certificates of Deposit/Neg. - Bank Federal Agency Issues - Coupon Portfolio CITY CP City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Page, 3 Portfolio Details - Investments February 28, 2005 Federal Agency Issues - Coupon 3128X1L96 1233 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 10K)8/2003 4,000,000.00 3,951,367.80 3,997,600.00 2.800 2.782 565 09/17/2006 3128X2P25 1257 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 0~30~2004 3,000,000.00 2,973,549.04 3,000,000.00 4.000 3.94.5 1,490 03/3~ Treasury Securities - Coupon Po~olio CITY CP City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Page Portfolio Details - Cash February 28, 2005 SavingsJMIscellaneous Accounts ~,~ Portfolio CITY ----- CP City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Page Activity By Type February 1,2005 through February 28, 2005 Beginning Stated Tmn~lon Pumhases Redemptions Ending Local Agency Investment Fund (Monthly Summary) Savlng-=~/llscellaneous Accounts (Monthly Summary) SYS00180 00180 BANK OF AMERICA 0.500 0,00 711,038.00 Federal Agency Issues - Coupon Podfolio CITY CP Run Date: ~005 - 10:05 PM (PRF_PM3) SymRept V6.21 City of Rancho Cucamonga Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents For the Month Ended January 31, 2005 Trustee and/or Purchase Maturity Cost Bond Issue Pavino Auent Account Name Investment Date Date Yield Value Assessment District No 93-1 US Bank Imprvmnt Fund First American Treasury Obligation 8/4/1997 N/A* 1.41% $ 257,311.78 Masi Plaza Imprvmnt Fund Cash N/A N/A N/A Reserve Fund First American Treasury Obligation 8/4/1997 N/A* 1.41% 243,664.32 Reserve Fund N/A N/A N/A Redemp. Fund First American Treasury Obligation 8/4/1997 N/A 1.40% 1,638.02 Redemp. Fund Cash N/A N/A N/A $ 502,614.12 PFA RFDG Rev Bonds series US Bank E~pense Fund First American Treasury Obligation 711/1999 N/A* 0.00% $ Cash N/A N/A N/A 1999 A (Sr) & 1999 B (Subord) Sub Resrv. Fund First American Treasury Obligation 711/1999 N/A* 1.41% 582,855.34 Cash N/A N/A N/A Sr. Resrv, Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A* 1.41% 1,094,964.40 Cash N/A N/A N/A Redemption Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A* 0.00% Cash N/A N/A N/A Revenue Fund First American Treasury Obligation 3/2/2000 NIA* 0,00% 5.05 Cash N/A N/A N/A Residual Fund First American Treasury Obligation 1/16/2001 N/A* 1.41% 56,023,19 Cash N/A N/A N/A $ 1,733,847.98 TOTAL CASH AND INVESTMENTS WITH FISCAL AGENTS $ 2,236,462.10 · Note: These investments are money market accounts which have no stated maturity date as they may be liquidated upon demand. ~%~ i:VinancelCash with Fiscal Agents.xls 3/~2~05 4:13 PM R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Staff Report DATE: March 16, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Kenneth Fung, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES AND TO AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR IMPROVEMENTS IN PHASE 01/03 FINAL WORK OF CFD'S 2001-01 & 2003-01 FOR FINAL STREET OVERLAY, FINAL STRIPING, MEDIAN ISLAND CONSTRUCTION AND LANDSCAPING, TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATION, ETC. ON FOOTHILL BOULEVARD FROM ROCHESTER AVENUE TO 1-15 FREEWAY TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NUMBERS 16123035650/1442612-0 AND 16143035650/1442614-0 AND APPROVAL TO ALLOW A MEDIAN BREAK ON FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND CHANGE STREET TREE DESIGNATION ON FOOTHILL BOULEVARD RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council approve the plans and specifications for the "Foothill Boulevard Median and Street Improvements from Rochester Avenue to 1-15 Freeway Right of Way Project" and approve the attached resolution authorizing' the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids." BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Foothill Boulevard is the primary access route into the Victoria Gardens Mall from the 1-15 Freeway. The project will result in the ultimate improvement of Foothill Boulevard from Rochester Avenue to the 1-15 Right of Way. As such this project will provide a positive first impression of this City to the mall's many visitors. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: CFD - Final Work March 16, 2005 Page 2 The improvement work includes the construction and landscaping of median islands, street work within the 1-15 Right of Way to add a third westbound lane, modification of the southbound I-15 off ramp traffic signal, final street overlay, final striping, etc. The median island will include an opening to allow left turns from eastbound Foothill Boulevard into the Regency Center. This median break will be located approximately 900 feet west of Day Creek Boulevard. This median break does not conform to the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, which calls for median breaks only at signalized intersections. The Public Works Subcommittee reviewed and recommended this median break for approval. Approval of the plans and specifications will constitute the approval of a design exemption to the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. Also, the designated street tree for Foothill Boulevard is being changed t0 Canary Island Pines. The present street tree (African Sumacs) is very vigorous and requires heavy maintenance; including four major prunings a year. This is extremely expensive and requires the closing of the #1 travel lane in both directions. Canary Island Pines, on the other hand, only require a major pruning once every three years. The capital improvement program to install the necessary infrastructure for the Victoria Gardens Mall sphere is nearly complete. The sphere extends from Base Line Rd. on the north, Arrow Rte. and the 1-15 Freeway to the south, the SC Edison transmission corridor to the west, and Etiwanda Avenue and 1-15 Freeway to the east (see exhibit). This project will complete Phases lB(c) 3B(a) and 3B(b) (Foothill Boulevard) of the Community Facilities District. Funds for these improvements are from the two CFD's, Account No. 16123035650/1442612-0 & 16143035650/1442614-0. Legal advertising is scheduled for March 22 and March 29, 2005, with the bid opening at 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, April 5, 2005, unless extended by Addenda. Respectfully submitted, William O O'Neil City Engineer WJO:KF Attachments: Vicinity Map and Resolution A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FO.R THE CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS IN PHASE 01/03 FINAL WORK OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICTS 2001-01 AND 2003-01, (TO BE BID AND CONSTRUCTED AS ONE PROJECT), INCLUDING FINAL STREET OVERLAY, FINAL STRIPING, MEDIAN ISLAND CONSTRUCTION AND LANDSCAPING, TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATION, ETC. ON FOOTHILL BOULEVARD FROM ROCHESTER AVENUE TO 1-15 FREEWAY, IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for "PHASE 01/03 FINAL WORK OF CFD'S 2001-01 & 2003-01 FOR FINAL STREET OVERLAY, FINAL STRIPING, MEDIAN ISLAND CONSTRUCTION AND LANDSCAPING, TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATION, ETC. ON FOOTHILL BOULEVARD FROM ROCHESTER AVENUE TO 1-15 FREEWAY BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, April 5, 2005, sealed bids or proposals for the "PHASE 01/03 FINAL WORK OF CFD'S 2001-01 & 2003-01 FOR FINAL STREET OVERLAY, FINAL STRIPING, MEDIAN ISLAND CONSTRUCTION AND LANDSCAPING, TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATION, ETC. ON FOOTHILL BOULEVARD FROM ROCHESTER AVENUE TO 1-15 FREEWAY" Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of PHASE 01/03 FINAL WORK OF CFD'S 2001-01 & 2003-01 FOR FINAL STREET OVERLAY, FINAL STRIPING, MEDIAN ISLAND CONSTRUCTION AND LANDSCAPING, TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATION, ETC. ON FOOTHILL BOULEVARD FROM ROCHESTER AVENUE TO 1-15 FREEWAY". RESOLUTION NO. March 16, 2005 Page 2 PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein before stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public work's project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. RESOLUTION NO. March 16, 2005 Page 3 Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work herein before mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least 10% of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashiers' check, cedified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the Iow bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be 100% of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to 100% of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. On the date and at the time of the submittal of the Bidder's Proposal the Prime Contractor shall possess any and all contractor licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; Including but not limited to a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) or a combination of Specialty Class "C" licenses sufficient to cover all the work to be performed by the Prime RESOLUTION NO. March 16, 2005 Page 4 Contractor in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code," Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and payment of $75.00 (SEVENTY-FIVE DOLLARS), said $75.00 (SEVENTY-FIVE DOLLARS) is non refundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional non reimbursable payment of $25.00 (TWENTY-FIVE DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga reserves the right to reject any or all bids. Questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids for "PHASE 01/03 FINAL WORK OF CFD'S 2001- 01 & 2003-01 FOR FINAL STREET OVERLAY, FINAL STRIPING, MEDIAN ISLAND CONSTRUCTION AND LANDSCAPING, TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATION, ETC. ON FOOTHILL BOULEVARD FROM ROCHESTER AVENUE TO 1-15 FREEWAY" may be directed to: Kenneth Fung, Assistant Engineer at (909) 477-2740, ext. 4022. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this 16th day of March, 2005 Publish Dates: March 22 and March 29, 2005 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this 16th day of March, 2005 William J. Alexander, Mayor RESOLUTION NO. March 16, 2005 Page 5 ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 16th day of March 2005 Executed this 16th day of March 2005, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk ADVERTISE ON: March 22 and March 29, 2005 ' . ~ N.T.S. · i ,';,' /,' ,',, / ,/.,., . ... / ] ,t, r,,,%;#.~.~ . ' ~ o~. ' FOOTHILL BOULE~A~-~D~N A~T~ET .. 1-15 ~G~T OF WAY PRO. CT R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A E N G I N E E R I N G D E P A R T M £ N T StaffRe rt DATE: March 16, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Gary Varney, Streets Superintendent SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "CITYWIDE CONCRETE REPAIR, TREE REMOVAL AND TREE PLANTING ANNUAL MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT RE-NEGOTIABLE ON A YEAR-TO-YEAR BASIS" AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NUMBER 1001316-5300 ($350,000) AS APPROVED IN THE 04/05 BUDGET RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve plans and specifications for the "Citywide Concrete Repair, Tree Removal And Tree Planting Annual Maintenance Agreement Re-Negotiable On A Year-To-Year Basis" and authorize the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids" to be funded from account number 1001316- 5300 ($350,000) as approved in the 04/05 budget. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Through competitive bid in 2001, JDC, Inc. was determined to be the lowest, responsible, responsive bidder for ~'~ city-wide concrete repair, tree removal and tree planting. Since this time, JDC has met the expectations of the city, provided exceptional service and held to their original prices. However, this year, JDC has requested an 11% increase over their existing prices citing a large increase in their cost for materials. Although this may be the case, staff would like to take this opportunity to competitively bid this work to assure the best possible pricing for the City. The scope of work to be performed in general consists of, but not limited to the furnishing of all labor, materials, tools and equipment required for the miscellaneous removal and replacement of trees, sidewalks, curbs and gutters at various locations citywide in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Re~pect¥1y submitted, , WJO:GV:dlw SOLUTION NO. 05'09b A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR "CITYWIDE CONCRETE REPAIR, TREE REMOVAL AND TREE PLANTING ANNUAL MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT RE- NEGOTIABLE ON A YEAR-TO-YEAR BASIS" AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council has prepared specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for the "CITYWIDE CONCRETE REPAIR, TREE REMOVAL AND TREE PLANTING ANNUAL MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT RE-NEGOTIABLE ON A YEAR-TO-YEAR BASIS". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council will receive at the OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK IN THE OFFICES OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ON OR BEFORE THE HOUR OF 2:00 P.M. ON APRIL 13, 2005 sealed bids or proposals for "CITYWIDE CONCRETE REPAIR, TREE REMOVAL AND TREE PLANTING ANNUAL MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT RE-NEGOTIABLE ON A YEAR-TO-YEAR BASIS" in said City. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council, California, marked, "BID FOR CITYWIDE CONCRETE REPAIR, TREE REMOVAL AND TREE PLANTING ANNUAL MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT RE-NEGOTIABLE ON A YEAR-TO-YEAR BASIS". Resolution No. Page 2 A Pm-Bid Job Walk is scheduled for April 6, 2005, at 10:00 a.m. at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Yard, 9153 Ninth Street, Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730, where bidders may present questions regarding the Bid Documents: Plans, Proposals, Specifications. THIS MEETING IS MANDATORY, Verification of attendance at the Pre-Bid Job Walk will be documented by signing in at the meeting. Any bidder not documented as being present at the Pre-Bid Job Walk will be excluded from the bid process. PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provision of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any appmnticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 pement in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. Resolution No. Page 3 The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any appmnticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (10%) of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to fumish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. Resolution No. Page 4 No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess any and all contractors licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; including but not limited to an "A" (General Engineering Contractor). In accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulation adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the California Business and Professions Code, Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS), said $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS) is non-refundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans a~d specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional non- reimbursable payment of $15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia, reserves the right to reject any and all bids. Questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids for "CITYWIDE CONCRETE REPAIR, TREE REMOVAL AND TREE PLANTING ANNUAL MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT RE-NEGOTIABLE ON A YEAR-TO-YEAR BASIS" may be directed to: Gary Varney, Streets Maintenance Superintendent Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 477-2700, ext. 4106 By order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califomi'a. Dated this 16th day of March, 2005. ADVERTISE ON: March 22, 2005 and March 29, 2005 T H E C I T Y O F Rancho Cucamonga SlaffReport DATE: March 16, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Peter M. Bryan, Fire Chief BY: Pamela J. Pane, Management Analyst II SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE DEPUTY CITY MANAGER, FINANCE OFFICER, AND FIRE CHIEF TO EXECUTE THE APPROPRIATE DOCUMENTATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF OBTAINING FEDERAL AND STATE ASSISTANCE FROM VARIOUS COMPETITIVE GRANT PROGRAMS RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached Resolution authorizing the Deputy City Manager, Finance Officer, and Fire Chief to execute the necessary documentation for obtaining federal and state assistance from various competitive grant programs. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS As part of the process of seeking federal and state assistance through competitive grant programs, the City Council is asked to consider and approve the attached Resolution. The Resolution authorizes City staff to file the forms needed to submit reimbursement requests for competitive grants as awarded to the City. Due to the fact that we are currently seeking out all available grants offered by the Office of Emergency Services, we are requesting a blanket resolution to reduce the time of processing separate resolutions for each grant award. Respectfully submitted, Peter M. Bryan / Fire Chief Attachment RESOLUTION NO. ¢~--~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA AUTHORIZING THE DEPUTY CITY MANAGER, FINANCE OFFICER, AND FIRE' CHIEF TO EXECUTE THE APPROPRIATE DOCUMENTATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF OBTAINING FEDERAL AND STATE ASSISTANCE FROM VARIOUS COMPETITIVE GRANT PROGRAMS WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga actively seeks all opportunities for federal and state assistance through competitive grant programs; and WHEREAS, the appropriate forms must be on file with federal and state agencies to obtain reimbursements from competitive grant programs. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that the Deputy City Manager, or Finance Officer, or Fire Chief is hereby authorized to execute for an in behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a public entity established under the laws of the State of California, all documentation to such competitive grant programs the assurances and agreements required. R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A CO~II~ITY ~ l~l~Vl C 1~ & DA'rtl: Mamh 16, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council ,Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager I~IOM: Ke¥in McArdle, Community Se[vices Director Joe O'Neil, City Engineer Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III Karen McGuire-Emery, Senior Park Planner Dan Coleman, Principal Planner SUB, JECT: PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE RECOMMENDATION: In accordance with the City Council's request to become more informed of park and recreation facility issues, programs, projects and events, this report is provided to highlight pertinent issues, projects and programs occurring in both the Community Services Department, the Park Design/Development and Maintenance Sections of Engineering and the Planning Division. This report is provided to the City Council for informational purposes only. No action need be taken on this item. A. PARKS AND FACILITIES UPDATE Central Park: · Contractor is working on installing wall coverings and finish carpentry, as well as mechanical/electrical and plumbing finishes. Store-fronts and door hardware are continuing to be installed. Central Park Landscape and Irrigation Project: · The final area to receive landscape material is under construction. Rancho Cucamonga Cultural Center Project: · Project is proceeding well. Rebar has been set for the cast in place basement walls in the Theater basement. The Event Area footings are ready for steel. The template and forms have been set for the east walls and the footings are being dug for the footings on the west walls. Mayor and Members of the City Council PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE March 16, 2005 Victoria Arbors Park: · Working on installing restroom fixtures. Continuing installation of backstop and fence for the ballfield. Play equipment installation is underway. Project proceeding at a fast pace. Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail: · Our environmental consultant, LSA Associates, Inc. is working on a response to Caltrans corrections to various environmental documents to obtain the federal environmental clearance. This is a crucial step that is required before we can get our allocation of the $3.7 million STE grant money for Phase I between Haven and 1200' east of Etiwanda Avenue. · Staff working on grant application under the state's Bicycle Transportation Account funding to design and construct the portion between Grove and Foothill. Staff will also be applying for Transportation Development Act (TDA) Article 3 funding for the portion between Archibald and Haven. · Staff has already applied for Safe Route to School funds for the Base Line Road to Amethyst reach. SANBAG has informed staff that they have set aside approximately $1 million in funding from TEA (federal transportation funds) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga's portion of the Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail. This is significant because only $4.5 million was available for all cities in region. · Master Plan was completed and adopted by City Council on December 6, 2000. $4,000,000 in federal and state grant funds have been obtained to date. Engineering construction design plans for Phase II between Amethyst and Archibald are ready for signature and should be going out to bid soon. · City applied for a time extension on our $272,000 BTA grant for Phase II in anticipation of beginning construction in summer 2005. · The Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation on October 13, 2004 approved use of their non-profit organization to become a donation collector for this important trail project. To date we have raised $606 in donations. Etiwanda Railway Station Property: · The City Council scheduled on March 2, 2005 to consider an agreement between City and San Bernardino Associated Governments (property owner) to share the cost of demolition of miscellaneous buildings and perform site clean-up and removal of hazardous materials. Bids have been received for clean-up of the property. · Master Plan was completed and adopted by City Council on December 6, 2000, that identified the station as a "signature trailhead" high priority for the Pacific Electric inland Empire Trail. · The Engineering Department has begun using the station property for public works maintenance activities. Burglar alarms have been installed in the station building; however, there are no fire sprinklers in the building. Engineering Department has estimated it would cost approximately $253,000, including fire sprinklers, to bring station up to code for occupancy by Public Works staff. Mayor and Members of the City Council PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE March 16, 2005 · Fifty thousand ($50,000) in CDBG construction funds approved in FY2004-05, mostly for demolition of accessory structures on property. ·Conceptual site plan and community garden plan are complete. Architerra agreed to donate their services to prepare community garden construction plans. · Mayor and staff met with restaurateur who is interested in leasing Station building for an upscale steakhouse; however, before going any further, City Council policy discussion needed regarding desired uses for property. If City wishes to sublease Station, or a portion thereof, to a commercial business, then a Request for Proposals should be issued. B. COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE Senior Services: · The senior's annual St. Patrick Day event, will take place on Thursday, March 17th starting at 10:0 a.m. The event will include entertainment of singing sensation Gerri Iris Bryant, games, green food and good old Irish fun. · SDrin(3 Flin(~, Thursday, March 31, 10:00 a.m. Put on you best spring bonnet and join us as we celebrate the arrival of spring, when life springs eternal. This event will feature fabulous vocalist Joe Mannino, great refreshments', a bonnet parade and terrific door prizes. · Golden Follies Talent Showcase, March 19, 2005, 2:00 p.m. Join us at the Montclair Senior Center for the annual Golden Follies Talent Showcase featuring talented seniors from Rancho Cucamonga, Upland, Ontario, Chino, and Montclair. Our line dancers will represent Rancho Cucamonga in the competition. Tickets for the event are now available at the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center. .e The Senior Advisory Committee will hold their next regular scheduled meeting on Monday, March 28, at 9:00 a.m. · The Senior Center is continuing to accept registrations for its annual Senior Citizens Fine Art Show, to be held Saturday April 2, from 12:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. This Fine Art Show is a non-juried art competition featuring artwork made of the following media: oil/acrylic, watercolor/pastel, mixed media, sculpture, photography, graphite, and the new category, fiber arts. The art show will feature demonstrations, entertainment, refreshments and an awards ceremony. Trips and Tours: · "The Lion Kin.q" live on stage, April 2, 2005. Experience the phenomenon of Disney's The Lion King musical at the Costa Mesa Performing Arts Center. Marvel at the breathtaking spectacle of animals brought to life by award-winning director, Julie ; Taymor, the woman responsible for this show's visual imagery, which is powerful : enough that you'll remember it forever. Thrill to the pulsating rhythms of the African pridelands with an unforgettable score including Elton John and Tim Rice's Oscar- winning songs "Can You Feel The Love Tonight" and 'q'he Circle Of Life". Before the show, we'll stop for dinner (on your own) at the South Coast Plaza. Then, it's on to the musical, one of the first performances since the show's return to Southern California! Cost: $103.00 per person. ¥! Mayor and Members of the City Council PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE Mamh 16, 2005 · Kodak Theater and Farmers Market, April 18, 2005. Step behind the velvet rope and experience the glamour of the home of the Academy Awards, as we take a guided tour of the Kodak Theatre at Hollywood and Highland. See an Oscar Statuette, visit the exclusive George Eastman VIP Room, learn where this year's nominees sat and gain an insider's view behind the scenes of the production. We'll then travel to the famous Farmer's Market for you to have lunch and explore the myriad of shops, all on your own. Cost: $34.00 per person. · Champions On Ice, May 1, 2005. Travel with us to the beautiful Arrowhead Pond of Anaheim to watch the best in ice entertainment! Featuring the following performers: Michelle Kwan, Irina Slutskaya, Timothy Goebel, Evgeni Plushenko, EIvis Stojko, Sasha Cohen, Victor Petrenko, Philippe Candeloro, Surya Bonaly, Rudy Galindo, Dan Hollander, Irina Grigorian, Vladimir Besedin and Oleksiy Polishchuk, Fumie Suguri, Tatiana Totmyanina and Maxim Marinin, Elena Sokolova, and Johnny Weir. Enjoy souvenirs and refreshments on your own! Cast of skaters subject to change due to injury or other unforeseen circumstances. Cost: $96.00 per person. Human Services: · The Doctor Is In: Dr. Harvey D. Cohen, M.D. presented the following lectures at the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center in March: -Bio-terrorism: Tuesday, March 15, 2005, 12:00 p.m. -Forgetfulness: Is it Dementia?: Wednesday, March 16, 2005, 7:00 p.m. · Health Screeninq: Free health assessments are conducted monthly by nurses from the San Bernardino County Department of Public Health to individuals 60 years and better and included the following services: health history, pulse, blood pressure, height, weight, hemoglobin and blood sugar. Counseling and referrals were also available. The next FREE health screening will be on Tuesday, April 12, 2005, from 9:00 a.m.-12:00 p.m., at the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center. · USDA Food Commodities: The San Bernardino County Food Bank, along with the City of Rancho Cucamonga, distributes surplus food on the first Monday of every month to eligible residents at the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center. Eligibility is based on income and the size of the household. Distribution begins at 1:30 pm on a first come, first served basis. There is a homebound delivery program for the physically disabled. Proof of residency and income are required. Our next distribution date is: April 4t~, · Home Maintenance Services: The Oldtimers Foundation provides seniors with an on- going home maintenance service. Services include minor plumbing, electrical and carpentry repairs. For more information, call the Oldtimers Foundation at (909) 822- 4493. · Operation Strate.qic Support: Help supply our military's deployed Armed Forces with items they miss everyday such as grooming aids, letters, magazines, newspaper clippings, videos, games, non-perishable foods, phone cards, etc. If you are interested in donating to our nation's heroes, please call (909) 477-2780 for more information. · Free Income Tax Preparation: The City of Rancho Cucamonga and the American Association of Retired Persons (AARP) are providing free Federal and State income tax assistance to those of Iow to moderate incomes. The tax consultants are AARP volunteers that have passed the IRS and State exams. No appointments are necessary. Mayor and Members of the City Council PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE March 16, 2005 Participants will be assisted on a first come, first served basis at the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center on Tuesdays and Thursdays from 9:00 a.m.-12:30 p.m. Those interested in receiving assistance should bring the following items with them: > Copy of last year's Federal and State tax return. > W-2 and 1099 forms showing all sources of income. ~' Sale of property and escrow papers, if applicable. ~' Proof of any expenses that might qualify as deductions. · Mini-Resource Directory: The Human Services Division has created a Rancho Cucamonga Community Services Mini-Resoume Guide for the Inland Empire. The following programs/services are included: Abuse & Domestic Violence, Addiction Treatment, Anti-Gang Programs, Basic Needs & Emergency Assistance, Children & Youth, Consumer Information, Counseling & Mental Health, Education & Literacy, Employment & Volunteering, Family Planning & Parenting, Health & Medical Services, Hotlines, Housing, Legal Assistance and Senior Services. Mini-resource guides will be available at all City facilities starting in March. Volunteer Services: · "We Love Our Sensational Senior Center Volunteers" - Volunteer Services and Senior Services held a volunteer appreciation event on Monday, February 14th for all volunteers who work out of to the Senior Center. It was the pedect opportunity to acknowledge the current core group of Senior Center volunteers before the relocation to Central Park. Each volunteer received a gift bag of goodies and a Valentine's thank you card from the C~ty. · The table below summarizes the Community Services Department volunteer usage for the month of January 2005, and the totals from September through January 2005: CSD Month: January 2005 September-January 2005 if of if of if of if of Division Volunteers Hours $ Value* Volunteers Hours $ Value* Senior Services 96 872 12,20~ 154 3,22~ 45,16,~ -luman Services 30 14E 2,07.c 21¢ 719 10,06(~ 3ports 167 3,21C 44,94£ 621 10,424 145,93E Special Events 0 £ (: 8.~ 371 5,19,~ =erforming Arts 8 221 30~ 3c~ 9¢ 1,26(: l'eens 43 184 2,57( 295 1,541 21,57,~ ~'outh Programs 0 0 £ ~ 82 11,14~ Administration ~ 15 210 2.~ 7.~ 1,05( Total 349 4,451 62,314 1,42.( 16,52~ 241,392 *Based on a value of ~14/hr Teens: · The table on the next page summarizes teen pro.qram attendance for the month of February 2005: Mayor and Members of the City Council PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE March 16, 2005 Program Attendance / February 2005 Teen Center 542 / 296 Valentines Dance Homework Room Closed for repairs TRAC - Babysitting 80 participants; 18 volunteers TRAC - Snack bars 6 TRAC - Monthly activities 29 Spruce Skate Park 805 Teen Connection 7 Babysitters Workshop --CPR Test Retake 20 · Teen Center - Even though February was a short month, our teens were very busy with a variety of fun filled activities. The teens enjoyed watching movies on Fridays, getting twisted with Twister, participating in a dodge and a ping-pong tournament. · The Kin.q and Queen Valentine's Ball held on February 12th, was a great success. Attendance for the dance was higher than the last two dances for grades 6-8th. · Rentals for the Teen Center facility have become quite popular and several bookings are confirmed for the upcoming months. · The Spruce Skate Park- Staff meets with teens using the facility on the second Thursday of the month. Items discussed generally include: park issues, new safety information, laws and upcoming major events in other cities. Our power point safety assembly program will be shown at four local elementary schools beginning in March. · Staff is awaiting the installation of cable in the Teen Center Homework Room. Once we get cabled into the system we will once again be able to offer Intemet service to the teens. We are also expecting down-streamed computers from City Hall once Central Park opens. Staff is hopeful that once new computers and Internet service are installed, teens will spend more time doing school projects in the Teen Center Homework Room. · Teen Recreation Activity Club, TRAC, had a very busy schedule this month. We started February off with our Night on the Town babysitting service. On February 12th TRAC volunteers hosted a snack bar for the King and Queen Valentine's Ball. The snack bar was a success; we sold out of everything and brought in a great profit. This month's TRAC meeting was fun and informative. Teens reviewed upcoming events and trips, while munching on snacks and had a few laughs during a balloon activity. During the month of March, TRAC members will participate in the National Canned Food Drive for the less fortunate. Food collected will be distributed in the beginning of March at Our Lady of Mount Carmel Church. · Teen Connection is providing volunteer opportunities for high school students in need of community service projects for graduation. Staff, continues to serve these students by making every effort to place them in a Community Services Department program. · Teen Workshops - No workshops were scheduled for the month of February. However, youngsters who did not pass their CPR test at the January 29th Babysitter's Workshop were allowed the opportunity to come to the RC Family Sports Center on Tuesday, February 22"d and Thursday, February 24th to receive additional training and retake their certification test. The Sixth Annual Career Expo is scheduled for Thursday, March 17th at the RC Family Sports Center from 6:30pm to 8:30pm. Currently there are over 60 business and college representations that will attend. Mayor and Members of the City Council PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE Mamh 16, 2005 · REAL (Rancho Cucamonqa, Etiwandal Alta Loma, Los Osos) Hi.qh School Advisory Committee continues to meet monthly to plan and develop new programming for high school students. The committee anticipates having some really fun and exciting activities planned for summer. · Two special events for teens were held during the month of Mamh. The first, March Madness took place on Mamh 11th at the RC Family Sports Center. This all night sports competition was a big hit. The second event for teens and their families was the Career Expo that will take place on Thursday, Mamh 17th. The Career Expo is a wonderful opportunity for teens to explore a wide variety of different career options with representatives from different organizations. Youth Activities: · Playschool registration for our fall session is currently at 600 students in 50 classes. Waiting lists still exist for many of our Playschool classes. February's attendance was an astounding 15,246. · The Mobile Recreation Program "Fun on the Run" has become a fun neighborhood event. Fun on Run started it new session on January 31st and will continue through March 18~. Youngsters participating in the program cannot wait to do all the fun games and crafts that have been planned for each park. Three hundred and eight children attended our Mobile Recreation program during the month of February. The table below illustrates our park locations and program timeframe during the winter session. Weekday Park Location Program Time ~.,.~[~i~l~'~;l~ll~.~'~,~.~. ~-~ Monday Bear Gulch Park 2:30 pm-5:00 pm Tuesday Hermosa Park 2:30 pm - 5:00 pm ~ Wednesday Old Town Park 2:30 pm - 5:00 pm ~'""~"~"'~'"'-" Thursday Ellena Park 2:30 pm - 5:00 pm Friday Windrows Park 2:30 pm - 5:00 pm Lewis Partnership: · Kids Club operates Monday through Friday from 2:30p.m.until 4:30pm at Del Mar Apartments, Terra Vista, Evergreen and Carmel on alternating days of the week. Attendance is very strong totaling in the amount of 250 children. · The Lewis Teen Center operates Monday through Friday at Terra Vista Sycamore Terrace Apartments from 2:30 p.m. until 4:30pm. The Center serviced 215 teens during the month of February. Facilities: · The table below and on the next page displays building rental and recreation contract class attendance numbers for the month of February 2005: Activity Program Number Attendance Lions East Rentals 62 bookings 152 Mayor and Members of the City Council PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE Mamh 16, 2005 Activity Program Number Attendance Lions East Building 586 facility hours 5,011 Lions West Rentals 261 bookings 3,973 Lions West Building 741 facility hours 6,463 Contract Classes 300 classes 18,351 (Winter session) · Staff is continuing to meet quarterly with users of the Equestrian Center to address maintenance needs and programming. Our local groups are very cooperative and supportive of the City's efforts. · Park monitors keep daily reports of activities in our parks, often helping out residents in need of assistance. Youth Sports: · The table below summarizes youth sports activities for the reporting period: Activity # Participants Age/Gender # Teams Pee Wee Basketball 182 3-5/boys & girls 19 Youth Basketball 965 8-14/boys & girls 124 Youth Track and Field 80 8-14/boys & girls N/A Cucamonga Middle School - 35 6-13/boys & girls N/A Youth Sports Camp Cucamonga Middle School 20 8-adult N/A (CMS) Judo Cucamonga Middle School 64 8-14/boys & girls 8 (CMS) Youth Basketball Practice RC Family Sports Center: · The table below provides drop-in/open play participation at the Center for the reporting period: Activity # Participants Adult Basketball 824 Youth Basketball 1,604 Adult Racquetball 499 Youth Racquetball 87 Adult Volleyball 20 Youth Volleyball 34 Jazzercise 1,190 · The table below summarizes organized Adult Activity at the Sports Center during the reporting period: I Activity #Participants A~e/Gender I #Teams Racquetball 20 Adult/Male & Females N/A Basketball (full court) 200 Adult/Males 20 Basketball (3-on-3) 60 Adult/Males 8 Mayor and Members of the City Council PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE Mamh 16, 2005 Adult Sports: · The table below summarizes adult sport activities at the Epicenter for the reporting period: Activity # Participants # Teams Gender Softball 2,304 144 Males/Females Tennis 25 N/A Males/Females · There are four adult softball tournaments scheduled for the month of March at the Epicenter and Adult Sports Park. Non-Profit Sports Organizations: · The Sports Advisory Committee's next meeting will be on April 13, 2005. At this meeting the fall (August 1, 2005 - January 31,2006) field request forms will be due. Special Events: · We are currently in the planning stages for the Central Park Grand Openinq. We will be conducting two ribbon cuffing ceremonies; one for the James L. Brulte Senior Center and the other for the Goldy S. Lewis Community.Center. This long awaited event will take place this spring. · North Town Housing Development Corporation and the City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Services Department are proud to sponsor our annual Cinco de Mayo celebration again this year. The event will be held at Old Town Park on May 7, 2005 from 12:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. Entertainment, food booths, face painting, game booths, pony rides, inflatable rides and activities and much more will all be part of this fun-filled community event. · Other events we are currently in the creating and planning process for include: Concerts in the Park, Movies in the Park and our annual 4t~ of July Fireworks Celebration a--~'~'~' Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter. Cultural and Performing Arts: · Theatre Arts Academy Proqrams to beqin April 18th - The City will begin a wide variety of new programs with the establishment of the RC Theatre Arts Academy, which will begin the week of April 18th. The Academy will offer 27 new classes from "Beginning Acting" to "Mastering the Monologue." Musical performance groups will also be introduced including Children's Chorus I & II, an Adult Vocal Ensemble and the Showstoppers Performance Troupe. All programs are listed in the Spring Grapevine and on www. RCPark.com. Registration begins on March 14th for all of our new Theatre Arts Academy classes. · Curtain Up - Li,qht the Liqhts! - What is currently known as the Mission Room at the existing RC Senior Center will soon be transformed into a new performance space, compete with theatre sets, lights, and sound equipment, all with the purpose of presenting live performances at the facility as it takes on the new identity of the RC Theatre Arts Center. The first show to be presented in the new theatrical space is "The World Goes Round," a musical revue featuring 14 adult performers from the local area along with four talented musicians who comprise a live combo to accompany the dynamite singers. The show opens Friday, April 15th and plays weekends through April Mayor and Members of the City Council PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE March 16, 2005 23rd. Once the stage and technical equipment is in place for the production the room is expected to seat an audience of 100 - 130. Tickets are $10 for the show, which features great music from the classic Broadway productions of Chicago, Cabaret, Kiss of the Spider Woman and The Rink, among many others. Parks and Facilities: · The table below provides usage information for park picnic shelters and special use facilities for the month of February 2005: # of # of Hours Shelter Attendance Applications Rentals Used Red Hill 340 7 7 30 Heritage 229 8 8 24 Milliken 75 3 3 12 Hermosa 270 4 5 14 Coyote Canyon 0 0 0 0 Court Yard 0 0 0 0 Amphitheatre 0 0 0 0 Total 914 22 23 80 Heritage Park *Participants: 103 Equestrian Spectators: 0 3 3 8 Center Total: 103 *Equestrian participants includes drop-in use Epicenter Rentals/Activities: · Staff is working with the following applicants for 2005 rentals/activities: · ), Christian Okoye Foundation - Free Youth Soccer/Football Clinic - April 2, 2005 - Epicenter Soccer Fields. > Inland Valley Daily Bulletin - All Star Practice and Game - June 6th and 8th, 2005 - Epicenter Stadium. > Rancho Cucamonga High School - Graduation Ceremony- June 9, 2005 - Epicenter Stadium. ), National Adult Baseball Association - Champion Games - June 18, 2005 - Epicenter Stadium. > City - 4th of July Celebration - July 4, 2005 - Epicenter Stadium and Complex. > Quakes/Principal - Family Fun Fest - July 6, 2005 - Epicenter Softball Fields and Exterior Concourse Area. ~, Christian Okoye Foundation - Youth Holiday Event and 5/10K Run - December 10, 2005 - Epicenter Parking Lots A & B and City streets. Park and Recreation Commission: · The next meetinq of the Park and Recreation Commission will take place on Thursday, March 17, 2005. The following items are scheduled to be discussed/acted upon at this meeting: > Update on the Senior Advisory Committee. > Update on the Sports Advisory Committee. > Update on the Central Park project, > Update on the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center project. Mayor and Members of the City Council PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE March 16, 2005 > Review of strategic plan for the Lewis Family Playhouse. > Annual review of Facility Inventory, Needs Analysis and Facility Implementation Plan from the 2001 Recreation Needs and Systems Recommendation Study. Review and recommendation to the Planning Commission regarding General Plan Amendment DRC2004-01197. >Review of potential design concepts for a future Napa Soccer Complex project. >Discussion regarding conducting future Park and Recreation Commission meetings at Central Park. Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation; · The Executive Committee met on March 9, 2005. At this meeting the following items were discussed/acted upon: Update on Board Subcommittee. Discussion relating to fundraising efforts and strategies. Review and discussion of fundraising teams. Discussion relating to joint meeting with the Library Foundation. · A joint meeting with the Rancho Cucamonga Public Library Foundation was held on March 14th. At this meeting the following items were discussed: Update on Cultural Center Project: ,,' Construction ~' Logo ,,' Name Update on Strategic Plan for the Lewis Family Playhouse, the Library and Celebration Hall. > PAL Campaign update. Advanced fundraising training provided by Monica Hubbard Consultant to Non- profits. > Discussion with fundraising focus teams. Resp :ffully~d, Comr ~anity Services Director City Engineer City Planner hiCOMMSERV~Council&BoardslCityCouncil~StaffReports[2OO5tupdate3.16.05, doc R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A PUBLIC Li BRARY SlaffReport TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Deborah Kaye Clark, Library Director DATE: March 9, 2005 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF EXPENDITURE WITH BRODART INC, FOR THE ACQUISITION OF LIBRARY MATERIALS FOR THE ARCHIBALD LIBRARY IN THE AMOUNT OF $70,000 FROM LIBRARY ACCOUNT 12906015200 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the expenditure of $70,000 with Brodart Inc for the acquisition of approximately 6,000 titles for the Archibald Library to be funded from the following Library Account: Book Purchases for Archibald: $ 70,000 Library Acct 12906015200 BACKGROUND ANALYSIS At the Council Meeting of September 3, 2003, the Redevelopment Board approved contracting with Brodart Inc for the purchase of an Opening Day Collection or approximately 70,000 book titles. As part of the Request for Proposal process for the selection of the vendor to supply the Opening Day Collection, staff negotiated with Brodart, Inc. to extend the increased discount to include purchases made for the Archibald Library with the option to renew annually at the lower rate. The application of the new contract terms to the Archibald purchases moved the library's discount power from a 0%-43% sliding scale, with a guaranteed 48% on all hardback trade editions. In addition, a 25% reduction in the cost of processing was negotiated. FISCAL IMPACT Total savings realized for 2005/2006 will be approximately $10,000. CONCLUSION: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the budgeted expenditures. Respectfully submitted, Deborah Kaye Clark Library Director -2- R A N C H O C U C ^ M O N G A COHHUNIT¥ SERVICES staf Repor DATE: March 16, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director BY: Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III SUBJECT': APPROVAL OF A REQUEST FROM THE CHRISTIAN OKOYE FOUNDATION FOR A WAIVER OF RENTAL FEES FOR A FREE YOUTH FOOTBALL/SOCCER CLINIC AT THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA EPICENTER AND ADULT SPORTS COMPLEX ON APRIL 2, 2005. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve a request from the Christian Okoye Foundation to hold a free youth football/soccer clinic on the soccer fields at the Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter and Adult Sports Complex on Saturday, April 2, 2005 and waive associated rental fees. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The City has received a request from the Christian Okoye Foundation to hold a free youth football/soccer clinic on the soccer fields at the Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter and Adult Sports Complex on Saturday, April 2, 2005. The mission of the Christian Okoye Foundation is to capture the passion kids have for sports and to direct that energy to enhance their education and personal goals. This year's clinic, if approved by Council, will be the fourth held at the Epicenter and will draw at-risk and underprivileged youngsters to the area for a free 7-hour program that focuses on both the improvement of the their football/soccer skills and the development of their educational/personal goals. A number of known professional athletes will coach the youngsters as part of the clinic. The clinic will be open to both boys and girls ranging in age between 6 and 18 years of age. It is anticipated that the clinic will draw 1,000 Inland Empire youngsters. CITY COUNCIL REQUEST FROM THE CHRISTIAN OKOYE FOUNDATION FOR A WAIVER OF RENTAL FEES FOR A FREE YOUTH FOOTBALL/SOCCER CLINIC AT THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA EPICENTER AND ADULT SPORTS COMPLEX - APRIL 2, 2005 MARCH 16, 2005 Staff recommends that City Council consider the waiver of rental fees associated with the proposed free youth football/soccer clinic as the event directly supports the City's intent to host programs at the Epicenter that have a positive impact on the youngsters of our community. The Foundation would still be required to pay direct fees and charges associated with their event and would need to provide comprehensive public liability insurance naming the City as additionally insured. FISCAL IMPACT: The fiscal impact to the City for the waiver of fees and charges associated with this event will total $530. Respectf~ ~ Kevin Mc A-rdle Community Services Director Attachment h~cOMMSERV~c~unci~&B~ards~cityc~unci~Sta~Rep~rts[2~5IOk~yeF~undati~nY~uthC~inic4~2~5~d~c -2- RO. Box1323 I AltaLoma. CA91701 J p/909,481.3541 J f/909.481,3S44 J www. okoye.com J Tax lC~ 33-0874356 the Christian OkoyeFoundation k( t i°Y-eolfClassic StuffedHeroes° °Y" FO UN OAT I ON i .... porated rtsClinic Febmary 21, 2005 To: Rancho Cucamonga City Council FOUNOER I PRESIDEI~IT From: The Christian Okoye Foundation Christian Okoye BOARD OF DIRECTORS Kwame Apea Jim Milhon Chr~st~, Okoye The Christian Okoye Foundation, headed by Mr. Christian Okoye local resident Bob Mendes E ..... ~ Okoye and former All-Pro running hack for the Kansas City Chiefs, will be hosting EVENT DIRECTORS approximately 1000 Inland Empire kids for a tim filled day of sport and S~d,~o~. interaction at its annual-Free Football &-S0cc~r Clinic. )'he clinic is schedhled to take place on April 2"a, 2005 at the Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter Sports Bob D..,ap, Complex, fi.om 8:00 A.M. to 3:00 P.M. M~ ~o, Now in its 7th year in the Inland Empire and its 4th year at the Epicemer, the Michael Rademaker. Foundation draws at-risk and underprivileged kids for a free clinic, where well- Raleigh Hathaway,knovqn professional athletes coach the kids. The mission of the Christian Okoye Pre:m/urn Distribtl~ion Foundation is to capture the passion kids have for sports, and direct that energy to B,,~ enhance their educational and personal goals. The Foundation's decision to utilize Chris Hale sport as a vehicle for exposing kids to the importance of education and goal 1~o~ Sea~ setting gave rise to the Foundation's motto, "Education, Ideas and Sports." ~ob~. H~s The Foundation with the help of local businesses that set up booths during our Chr~s,~a~ Oko~ events, hopes to encourage kids to explore their interest in any area of business or Keith Cash learning. These corporate sponsors continue their assistance throughout the year MarcusAllen by providing support to the kids in their respective areas of interest. Da, Salaemua AS before, we are looking for the City Council to assist with a waver of the fees c~ for the use the sports fields (the 2 soccer/football fields) at the Epicemer Sports E~ Complex. The Clinic will be provided free of charge to the kids as stated. With {Srad Both your assistance, it is our hope that each child leaves this event as a better athlete o~ and, more importantly, a better person. Brian Noble Sincerely, ~ Eddie Lange Reggie Doss Director $id Ju,ti~ The Christian Okoye Foundation T H E C I ~' Y 0 F ~.AN CH 0 C U CAM 0 N GA Memorandum DATE: March 16, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services ,Director BY: Sigmund Dellhime, Management Analyst II ~ SUBJECT: APPROVAL FOR ANNUAL PRODUCT SUPPORT AND SERVICE RENEWAL FROM THE PROVIDER~ ORACLE CORPORATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $34~100 TO BE FUNDED FROM GENERAL FUND~ ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT~ INFORMATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 1001-209-5300 AND 1001-209- 5152 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the annual product license support and service renewal between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Oracle Corporation in the amount of $34,100 to be funded from General Fund, Administrative Services Department, Information Systems Division 1001-209-5300 and 1001-209-5152. BACKGROUND In 1996, City Council approved the purchase of Oracle enterprise database management system. This selection positioned Oracle as a cornerstone element of the City's emerging technology infrastructure and in essence committed the City to a long-term relationship. Annually the City is required to renew its subscription with the Oracle Corporation for its operating license and technical support. Oracle was, and continues to be, the dominant database operating system for most municipal organizations. It remains the dominant database system due to its versatility, reliability, and ongoing development that allows the City to continue adding applications to improve its technological base. Oracle is the foundational database operating system for the City's financial (IFAS), permit management . (Tidemark), registration (CLASS), and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) applications. Page 2 March 16, 2005 Staff Report for Annual Product Support and Subscription Service Renewal with Oracle Corporation With the software operating system, the annual support and subscription service with Oracle guarantees the City will remain in compliance with software licensing requirements pursuant to protection of copyrights and ensures the availability of ongoing technical support. This support agreement covers the period of May 26, 2005 through May 25, 2006. Respectfully submitted, Administrative Services Director ORACL E January 31, 2005 Customer Contact Tel Fax Email lphong@cityofrc.com Lorraine Phong CITY OF RkNCHO CUCAMONGA 10500 Civic Center Drive RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91730 Re: Support Renewal# 1897774 Dear Lorraine, Please find attached a quotation for the above support renewal. The support benefits and services you are receiving will expire on 25-MAY-05. This quotation is provided pursuant to the terms and conditions of the license agreement that you executed when you acquired your licenses. In order to renew this support and to ensure that there is no interruption to your technical support service, please fax your purchase order or other acceptable form of payment covering the renewal amount as detailed on the attached quotation, to my attention, before 28-APR-05. Please note that if your support is not renewed by the expiration date above, you may be subject to our reinstatement rules as contained in our Technical Support Policies. If the pre-tax value of this renewal is $2,000.00 or less, pre-payment in the form of a check or credit card must be received. Purchase orders are no longer accepted for these transactions. Your purchase order must include the following: Support Renewal 1897774 - Term of Support 26-MAY-05 and 25-MAY-06 Local Tax Applicable tax will be included on your invoice. If your company is tax-exempt, a copy of your tax exemption certificate must be included with your purchase order. Unless otherwise specified in your ordering document, all fees payable to Oracle are due within 30 days from the invoice date. Oracle's technical support policies govern the terms of your technical support and are subject to change. The most current technical support policies can be found on the web at http://www.oracle.com/support. Also, as we start providing more information and notices via email, it is important that you provide updated email information to ensure that you will receive all communication and notices from us. I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for your continued business with Oracle. If you require further information, please do not hesitate to contact me at your earliest convenience. Regards, Jodee Whitby jodee.whitby@oracle.com Tel : 916 315 6823 Fax : 916-315-5657 Oracle Support Services THIS QUOTATION IS VALID FOR SIXTY DAYS FROM THE DATE OF ISSUANCE. Special Instructions : (DI ACL ' Page 2 of 4 Oracle Support Renewal Date : January 31, 2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Support Renewal # 1897774 Lorraine Phong Tel Fax Service Level: Software Updates Start Date: 26-MAY-2005 End Date: 25-MAY-2006 Name System # Of Pricing License Qty Final Price Name Users Type Level Oracle 14042448 3 FULL USE 1 0.00 Database Enterprise Edition - Processor Perpetual Programmer - 14042448 5 FULL USE 1 0.00 Named User Plus Perpetual Oracle 14042448 1 FULL USE 1 23,250.00 Database Enterprise Edition - Processor Perpetual Subtotal: 23,250.00 Service Level: Product Support Start Date: 26-MAY-2005 End Date: 25-MAY-2006 Name System # Of Pricing License Qty Final Price Name Users Type Level Programmer - 14042448 5 FULL USE 1 1.00 Named User Plus Perpetual Oracle 14042448 3 FULL USE 1 1.00 Database Enterprise CDRACLEE Page 3 of 4 Oracle Support Renewal Date : January 31, 2005 Name System % Of Pricing License Qty Final Price Name Users Type Level Edition - Processor Perpetual Oracle 14042448 1 FULL USE 1 10,848.00 Database Enterprise Edition - Processor Perpetual subtotal: 10,850.00 Total Amount: 34,100.00 Plus Applicable Tax ORACLE Customer Details please verify and update the following information to enable us to provide an efficient and timely service to your company. Company Name : CITY OF PJ~NCHO CUCAMONGA For Quotation Contact Lorraine Phong Address 10500 Civic Center Drive PJ~NCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91730 US Tel Pax eMail 1phong@cityofrc.com For Invoice Contact PAYABLE~ ACCOUNTS Address PO BOX 807 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91729 Phone Fax email TH E CITY OF I~.AN C H 0 Co CA~I 0 N GA StaffR ort DATE: March 16, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Larry Henderson AICP, Principal Planner SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION TO APPROPRIATE $76,000 OUT OF AB1600 RESERVES INTO ACCOUNT NUMBER 1016301-5300 (CONTRACT SERVICES) IN CONNECTION WITH CITY/COUNTY INITIATED ANNEXATION DRC2004-01204. RECOMMENDATION: Authorize staff to appropriate $76,000 out of AB1600 reserves into account number 1016301-5300 to provide funding for costs associated with a proposed annexation of approximately 4,115 acres, as directed by City Council on January 5, 2005. BACKGROUND: On January 5, 2005 the City Council, at the County of San Bernardino's request, authorized staff to proceed with Annexation DRC2004-01204. A copy of the previous Staff Report is attached for reference. A working budget of $76,000 has been identified as the total needed to complete all required studies, documents, and LAFCO Fees. As individual components of the Annexation are worked out Staff will return to the City Council with updates and contract approvals. Respectfully submitted, City Planner Attachment: January 5, 2005 City Council Staff Report THE CITY OF I~ANCHO CI3CAMONGA DATE: January 5, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Larry Henderson, AICP, Principal Planner SUBJECT: REQUEST TO DIRECT STAFF TO INITIATE ANNEXATION DRC2004 - 01204 AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT (PRE-ZONE) DRC2004 - 01208 - A proposed annexation of approximately 4,115 acres of land, generally located north of the City boundary, between Haven Avenue and the City of Fontana border - This annexation area is also referred to as the North Eastern Sphere Annexation. APN: 0201-032-09, 50, 73, 78 thru 79, and 82 thru 85; 0201-281-02, 04 thru 10, 13 thru 14, and 16 thru 22; 0225-051-01, 04, 07, 15,17 thru 20, 22 thru 34, and 36 thru 37; 0225-061-02, 05 thru 06, 08 thru 11, 15 thru 17, 21 thru 22, .25 thru 30, and 33; 0225-071-01 thru 16 and 20; 0225-091-05 and 06; 0225-09-106; 0225-092-01; 0226-081-03, 07, 16, 20, 26 thru 28, 33, 47 thru 48, 56 thru 57, and 61 thru 74; 0226-082-08 and 19 thru 30 and a request to change the district map to pre-zone land within the City Sphere of Influence to Flood Control/Utility Corridor (390 acres), Open Space (268 acres), and Hillside Residential (21 acres) for a total of approximately 680 acres of land, and in conformance with the existing General Plan, generally located north of the City limits between Haven Avenue and extending approximately 6,430 feet easterly. APN: 0201-032-09, 73, 78 thru 79, and 82 thru 83; 0201-031-02, 04 thru 10, 13 thru 14, and 16 thru 22; and 0225-051-01 and 22 thru 23. RECOMMENDATION: Direct staff by minute action to take all steps necessary to process the annexation of the previously described portion of the Rancho Cucamonga Sphere of Influence. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: On November 9, 2004, the San Bernardino County Board of supervisors passed Resolution No. 2004-367 supporting the City's annexation of approximately 4,115 acres of land generally located north of the City boundary, between Haven Avenue and the City of Fontana border. A copy of the referenced County Resolution is attached as Exhibit "A". The County of San Bernardino is the majority property owner for the annexation area through the County Flood Control District and other Special Districts as well as the County itself and, therefore, it is appropriate to act on their request. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2004-01204AND DRC2004-01208 - CiTY OFRANCHO CUCAMONGA Janua~ 5,2005 Page 2 The annexation of this aroa would unite public services and should improve emergency response, eliminate confusing law enfoFcement jurisdictional boundaries, and give the control of land use issues, such as circulation, to the City. The area to be annexed and the portion requiring a pre-zone is shown on the map attached. CONCLUSION: The annexation of this aroa is in conformance with the General Plan policies of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and will provide for the continued conservation of open space and controlled development of private developable properties. Respectfully submitted, City Planner BB:LH\ma Attachments: Exhibit "A" - County Resolution No. 2004-367 Exhibit "B" - Map of Annex and Pro-Zone Area RESOLUTION NO. 2004-367 A RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT BY THE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AND ACTING AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT AND ACTING AS THE GOVERNING BODY FOR COUNTY SERVICE AREA 70, IMPROVEMENT ZONE OS1 SUPPORTING THE APPLICATION BY THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TO THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION FOR THE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY, AS MORE SPECIFICALLY DESCRIBED BELOW On Tuesday, November 9, 2004, on motion by Supervisor Young, duly seconded by Supervisor Biane, and carried, the following resolution is adopted by the Board of Supervisors of San Bernardino County, State of California. BE IT RESOLVED, by the San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors (hereinafter Board), and acting as the governing body of the San Bernardino County Flood Control District and acting as the governing body for County Service Area 70, Improvement Zone OS1, that: WHEREAS, the Board supports the City of Rancho Cucamonga's (hereinafter City) desires to initiate proceedings pursuant to the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000, commencing with Section 56000 of the California Government Code, for the annexation of territory to the City and the West Valley Vector Control District; and WHEREAS, the majority of the land within the proposed annexation as described by the City is under the control of the Board as vested in the San Bernardino County Flood Control District, County Service Area 70, Improvement Zone OS1, or the County; and WHEREAS, the territory proposed for annexation by the City is legally uninhabited and a description of the boundaries of the action is set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, and WHEREAS, the reason for the proposed annexation is to include the territory of the City's assigned sphere of influence within the corporate boundaries of the City so that an increased level of law enforcement can be provided to the area, and to provide the full range of the City's municipal services only to those areas designed for urban development. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this resolution of support conveying' the County's consent to the annexation of its lands for the proposed reorganization as described in Exhibit "A", in the manner provided by Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000, is hereby approved and adopted by the Board. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Clerk of the Board and acting as the Clerk of the San Bernardino County Flood Control District and acting as the Clerk of the County Service Area 70, Improvement Zone OS1 is hereby authorized and directed to transmit to the City Manager of the City and the Executive' Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission certified copies of this Resolution. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Supervisors of San Bernardino County, State of California, as the governing body of the San Bernardino County Flood Control District and governing body of the County Service Area 70, Improvement Zone OS1, by the following vote: AYES: SUPERVISORS: Young, Biane, Postmus, Aguiar and Hansberger NOES: SUPERVISORS: None ABSENT: SUPERVISORS: None STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) SS. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) I, J. RENEI~ BASTIAN, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino, State of California, hereby certify the foregoing to be a full, true and correct copy of the record of the action taken by the Board of Supervisors, by vote of the members present, as the same appears in the Official Minutes of said Board at its meeting of November 9, 2004. jrh Item # 25. J. REN~. DEC-15-2Z83 14:56 =. EXHIBIT "A" Those portions of land lying within Sections 13 and 14, Township 1 ~lc~tl",. Range 7 West, San Bemardino Meridian, described as follow~: All of said Section 13. That portion of said Section 14 lying withln that parcel of land desc'.~bed in document recorded in Book 9616, page 1793, Official Records of .;a.~ Bemardlno County. TOGETHER WITH; Those portions of land lying within Sections 1,5, 16, 17 18, 19, 22 and 33, Township 1 North, Range 6 West, San Bemordino Meridian, clescri:ed a.~ follows: All of said Sections 15, 16, 17 and 19. All of said Section 18. EXCEPTING THEREFROM any portion thereof lying within the West ':' al:' of the Nodhwest quaffer of sold Section 18. The East half of the East half of said Section 22, and that portio~ o" the East half of the West half and of the West half of the East half of solid Section 22, lying within that parcel of land described as Parcel 1, recorded in Book 8171, page 84, Official Records of San Be'nardl ~o County. The North half of said Section 30. EXCEPTING THEREFROM any portion of said Section 30, lying wffhin or Southerly of that parcel of land described in document recorced September 13, 2000, as Instrument Number 2000-0333231, Officia:. R~,cords of said County. Containing 3,830' acres, more or less. "E~T~I._ P. 82 4000 0 4000 8000 12000 Feet ~I NORTH EASTERN SPHERE ANNEXATION -ZONE DESIGNATION ~ FLOOD CONTROL / UTILITY CORRIDOR ~ HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL ~ OPEN SPACE ANNEXATION DRC2004-01204 DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT (PRE-ZONE) EXHIBIT "B" D RC2004-01208 - R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A E N Gl N E E RI N G D E P A R T M E N T StaffRe rt DATE: March 16, 2005 TO:. Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Gary Varney, Public Works Street Superintendent SUBJECF: APPROVE THE EXPENDITURE OF $24,000 FOR THE MARKING OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES BY UNDERGROUND TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED (UTI) (CO 03-087) AS APPROVED IN THE 04/05 BUDGET AND APPROPRIATE AN ADDITIONAL $16,000 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2004-2005 TO BE FUNDED FROM 1001316-5300 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the expenditure of $24,000 for the marking of underground utilities by Underground Technology Incorporated (UTI) (CO 03-087) as approved in the 04/05 budget and appropriate an additional $16,000 for fiscal year 2004-2005 to be funded from 1001316-5300. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Increased development and infrastructure in the City has activated a significant increase in calls for utility marking. California State Law requir6s a prompt response to these requests for the safety of construction personnel and the protection of underground utilities. As an owner of various underground facilities, the City is required to be a member of the "Underground Service Alert System", which was developed for the purpose of identifying and locating underground facilities prior to excavation by a contractor. The continued high volume of construction activities in our City has greatly out paced our original expectations for requests to locate and mark the City's underground facilities such as fiber optic conduit, Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility electrical conduits and vaults, City irrigation systems, City storm drains and traffic signal systems. The timely and accurate marking of these underground facilities is critical to remain in compliance with the law, to prevent unnecessary delays in both public and private projects and to mitigate the City's liability in the event that a City utility is damaged by a negligent contractor. Respectfully submitted, William J. O Neil City Engineer WJO:JLM:ju T H E C I T Y 0 F ID-AN C H 0 C U CAM 0 N GA Staff Report DATE: March 16, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council Jack Lam, A.I.C.P.; City Manager FROM: Pedro Odiz, Chief of Police ~) SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION TO ACCEPT GRANT REVENUE IN THE AMOUNT OF $30,833.00 FROM THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 2005 BYRNE JUSTICE ASSISTANCE GRANT (JAG) AWARD, INTO ACCOUNT NO. 1354000-4740 (GRANT INCOME) FOR USE BY THE POLICE DEPARTMENT FOR THE PURCHASE OF POLICE RELATED EQUIPMENT AND TECHNOLOGY. THE EQUIPMENT REQUESTED WOULD BE DIGITAL VIDEO CAMERAS AND RECORDING EQUIPMENT FOR USE IN CRIME SUPPRESSION THROUGH SURVEILLANCE. THE VIDEO CAMERAS WOULD BE BOTH STATIC AND MOBILE AND COULD BE MONITORED FROM A CENTRALIZED LOCATION. RECOMMENDATION The Police Department Staff recommends the Council grant authorization to accept grant revenue in the amount of $30,833.00 from the United States Department of Justice 2005 Byrne Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Award, into Account No. 1354000-4740 (Grant Income) for use by the Police Department for the purchase of police related equipment and technology. The equipment requested would be digital video cameras and recording equipment for use in crime suppression through surveillance. The video cameras would be both static and mobile and could be monitored from a centralized location. BAC KG ROU ND/ANALYSIS The JAG award replaces the Local Law Enforcement Block Grant (LLEBG) program, which for a number of years has provided local jurisdictions money for the purchase of equipment by their police departments. Although the award amounts have become increasingly smaller year-by-year, they still provide some money for use by police jurisdictions to purchase equipment they might not otherwise be able to afford. FISCAL IMPACT · The current Justice Department award procedure is to have the county government in which the jurisdiction receiving the award is located administer all grant paperwork. The jurisdiction receiving the grant no longer has to provide a funding match for the grant award, in accepting this grant the city of Rancho Cucamonga agrees to pay the San Bernardino County Law and Justice Group (the designated grant administrative body) a fee of five percent (5%) of the award amount ($1542.00 for administrative costs. The net award amount will be $29,291.00. R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Staff Report DATE: Mamh 16, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the Gity Gouncil Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Mark Brawthen, Contract Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DRC2002-00264, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF 6TM STREET AND UTICA AVENUE, SUBMI'I-FED BY 6TM & UTICA, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving DRC2002-00264, accepting the subject agreement and security, ordering .the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6, and authorizing the Mayor to sign said agreement and the City Clerk to attest thereto. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS DRC2002-00264, located on the southwest corner of 6th Street and Utica Avenue in the General Industrial District (Subarea 6) Development District, was approved by the Planning Commission on October 23, 2002 for the development of a 348,590 square foot industrial building on 13.5 acres of vacant land. The Developer, 6th & Utica, LLC, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond Cash Deposit $217,500.00 Labor and Material Bond Cash Deposit $108,750.00 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2002-00264 - 6TM & UTICA, LLC March 16, 2005 Page 2 A letter of approval has been received from Cucamonga Valley Water District. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms signed by the Developer are on file in the City Clerk's Office. Copies of the agreement and securities are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully submitted, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ENGINEERING DIVISION / William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:MB:pjb Attachments N.T.S. II METROLINK TRAIN 8TH ST [~RC2OO2-002~ ITEM: DRC2002-00254 TITLE:~ EXHIBIT "A" Ci~ of Rancho Cucamon.qa A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DRC2002-00264 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration and Improvement Agreement by 6th & Utica, LLC as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the southwest comer of 6m Street and Utica Avenue; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property referred to as DRC2002-00264; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: 1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and 2. That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney. RESOLUTION NO. ~5'~,~ ~ q A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DRC 2002-00264 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the 72 Act authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public heating and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owner of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding the such provisions of the 72 Act related to the annexation of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XII1D") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 72 Act to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 72 Act and/or Article XIIID applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1.: The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: This City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvements. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property To Be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: 6th and Utica, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company The legal description of the Property is: PARCEL A, AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED TO THAT CERTAIN LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 533, RECORDED AUGUST 22, 2002 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 20020440169 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FORMERLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THE EAST V2 OF LOT 20, SECTION 13 SOUTH, RANGE 7 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OF CUCAMONGA FRUIT LANDS, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 4 OF MAPS, PAGE(S) 9, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. NOTE: THE AREA AND DISTANCES OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ARE COMPUTED TO THE CENTERS OF THE ADJOINING STREETS, AS SHOWN ON SAID MAPS. Assessor's Parcel Nos: 0210-081-25-0-000 The above described parcels are shown on sheet A-2 attached herewith and by this reference made a part hereof. Exhibit B Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2004/2005 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (LMD #3B) represents landscape sites throughout the Commercial/Industrial Maintenance District. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The various landscape sites that are maintained by this district consist of median islands, parkways, street trees, entry monuments, the landscaping within the Metrolink Station and 22.87 acres associated with the Adult Sports Park (not including the stadium, parking lots or the maintenance building). STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS) Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD #1)) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL) Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (SLD #6) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on commercial and industrial streets throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally, this area encompasses the industrial area of the City south of Foothill Boulevard. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. This sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on industrial or commercial streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on industrial or commercial streets generally south of Foothill Boulevard. Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2004/2005) For Project: DRC2002-00264 Number of Lamps Street Lights 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L SLD # 1 --- 4 ......... SLD # 6 ............... Community Trail Turf Non-Turf Trees Landscaping DGSF SF SF EA LMD # 3B --- 7,680 8,681 94 *Existing items installed with original project Assessment Units by District Parcel Acres S I S 6 L 3B I 13.82 27.64 13.82 13.82 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2004/2005 LANDscAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $352.80 for the fiscal year 2004/05. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (Commercial/Industrial): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Comrnflnd Acre 2186.85 1.0 2186.85 $352.80 $771,520.68 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (DRC2002-00264) is: Parcel 1 - 13.82 Acres x 1 A.U. Factor x $352.80 Rate Per A.U. = $4,875.70 Annual Assessment STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2004/05. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Parcel 21,151 1.00 21,151 $17.77 $375,853.27 Family Multi- Unit 8,540 1.00 8,540 $17.77 $151,755.80 Family Commercial Acre 2,380.36 2.00 4,760.72 $17.77 $84,597.99 TOTAL $612,207.06 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (DRC2002-00264) is: Parcel 1 - 13.82 Acres x 2 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $491.16 Annual Assessment C-1 PM 16271 STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $51.40 for the Fiscal Year 2004/05. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Comm/Ind Acre 2,065.67 1.00 2,090.72 $51.40 $107,463.01 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (DRC2002-00264) is: Parcel 1 - 13.82 Acres x 1 A.U. Factor x $51.40 Rate Per A.U. = $710.35 Annual Assessment CERTIFICATE OF SUFFICIENCY CONSENT AND WAIVER TO ANNEXATION FOR DRC2002-00264 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B, STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WILLIAM J. O"NEIL, the undersigned, hereby certifies as follows: That ! am the CITY ENGINEER of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. That on the 16th day of March 2005, I reviewed a Consent and Waiver to Annexation pertaining to the annexation of certain property to the Maintenance District, a copy of which is on file in the Office of the City Clerk. That I caused said Consent and Waiver to Annexation to be examined and my examination revealed that said Consent and Waiver to Annexation has been signed by the owners of all of the property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District. That said Consent and Waiver to Annexation meets the requirements of Section 22608.1 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. EXECUTED this 16th day of March 2005, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. STATE OF CALIFORNIA R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Staff Report DATE: March 16, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer SUBJECt: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DRC2004-00145, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF ARROW ROUTE, EAST OF UTICA AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY PUBLIC STORAGE, INC. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject agreement and improvement securities, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 and authorizing the Mayor to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS DRC2004-00145, located on the south side of Arrow Route, east of Utica Avenue, in theGeneral Industrial District (Subarea 8), was approved by the Planning Comanission on August 11, 2004. This project is for the development of a public storage building totaling 62,622 sqare feet on 1.24 acres of land. The Developer, Public Storage Inc., is submitting an agreement and improvement securities to guarantee the construction of the public improvements in the following amounts: FaithfulPerformance Bond $ 10,900.00 Labor and Material Bond $ 5,450.00 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2004-00145 - PUBLIC STORAGE, INC. March 16, 2005 Page 2 Copies of the agreement and securities are available in the City Clerk's Office. A letter of approval has been received from Cucamonga Valley Water District. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms signed by the Developer are on file in the City Clerk's Office. Copies of the agreement and securities are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully submitted, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ENGINEERING DIVISION W~P.~O,Nei~l' I~'''~ City Engineer W JO:WV Attachments CITY OF ITEM: RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: ENGINEERING DIVISION A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALWORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR DRC2004-00145 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on March 16, 2005, by Public Storage, Inc., as Developer, for the improvement of the public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the south side of Arrow Route, east of Utica Avenue; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Securities, which are identified in said Improvement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES, as follows: 1. That said Improvement Agreement, be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and 2. That said Improvement Securities are accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DRC2004-00145 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the 72 Act authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public heating and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owner of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding the such provisions of the 72 Act related to the annexation of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XIlID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 72 Act to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and RESOLUTION NO. DRC2004-00145 March 16, 2005 Page 2 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 72 Act and/or Article XIlID applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this. reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: This City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Temtory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvements. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. Exhibit A To Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property To Be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: Public Storage, Inc. The legal description of the Property is: Real Property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bemardino, State of California, described as follows: PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 14457 IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 178, PAGES 86 THROUGH 88, OF PARCEL MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. i AND 6 CITY OF ~NCHO CUCAMONGA NORTH~/ COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFO~IA Exhibit B To Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2004/2005 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL) Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (LMD #3B) represents landscape sites throughout the Commercial/Industrial Maintenance District. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The various landscape sites that are maintained by this district consist of median islands, parkways, street trees, entry monuments, the landscaping within the Metrolink Station and 22.87 acres associated with the Adult Sports Park (not including the stadium, parking lots or the maintenance building). STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS) Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD #1)) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL) Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (SLD #6) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on commercial and industrial streets throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally, this area encompasses the industrial area of the City south of Foothill Boulevard. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. This sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on industrial or commercial streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on industrial or commercial streets generally south of Foothill Boulevard. Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2004/2005) For Project: DRC2004-00145 Number of Lamps Street Lights 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L SLD # 1 --- 1' ......... SLD # 6 --- Community Trail Tuff Non-Turf Trees Landscaping DGSF SF SF EA LMD # 3B --- *Existing items installed with original project Assessment Units by District Parcel Acres S 1 S 6 L 3B 1 1.24 2.48 1.24 1.24 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2004/2005 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $352.80 for the fiscal year 2004/05. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (Commercial/Industrial): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Comm/Ind Acre 2186.85 1.0 2186.85 $352.80 $771,520.68 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (DRC2004-00145) is: Parcel 1 - 1.24 Acres x 1 A.U. Factor x $352.80 Rate Per A.U. = $437.47 Annual Assessment STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2004/05. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Parcel 21,151 1.00 21,151 $17.77 $375,853.27 Family Multi- Unit 8,540 1.00 8,540 $17.77 $151,755.80 Family Commercial Acre 2,380.36 2.00 4,760.72 $17.77 $84,597.99 TOTAL $612,207.06 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (DRC2004-00145) is: Parcel I - 1.24 Acres x 2 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $44.07 Annual Assessment STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $51.40 for the Fiscal Year 2004/05. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/industrial): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Comm/Ind Acre 2,065.67 1.00 2,090.72 $51.40 $107,463.01 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (DRC2004-00145) Parcel 1 - !.24 Acres x 1 A.U. Factor x $51.40 Rate Per A.U. = $63.74 Annual Assessment R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Staff Report DATE: March 16, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Shelley Hayes, Engineer Technician SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR TR 16554, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HERMOSA AND BASE LINE ROAD, SUBMITTED BY HL HOMES CORPORATION RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving "rR 16554, accepting the subj.ect Agreement and Securities, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 and authorizing the Mayor to sign said agreement and the City Clerk to cause said map to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS TR 16554, located at the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Hermosa in the Low Residential Development District, was approved by the Planning Commission on January 141 2004, for the division of 1.66 acres into 6 lots. The Developers, HL Homes Corporation, are submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the public street improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond Cash Deposit $113,800.00 Labor and Material Bond Cash Deposit $ 56,900.00 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TR 16554 - HL HOMES CORPORATION March 16, 2005 Page 2 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. A letter of approval has been received from Cucamonga Valley Water District. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms signed by the Developer are on file in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully submitted, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ENGINEERING DIVISION William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:SH:pjb Attachments Vicinity Map City of Rancho Cucamonga -- BASE LINE S TR 16554 SO UTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 16554, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map 16554, submitted by HL Homes Corporation and consisting of 6 lots located at the southwest comer of Base Line Road and Hermosa was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on January 14, 2004, and is in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and Local Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that Act; and WHEREAS, Tract Map No. 16554 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Tract Map; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met by entry into an Improvement Agreement guaranteed by acceptable Improvement Security by HL Homes Corporation as developer; and WHEREAS, said Developer submits for approval said Tract Map offering for dedication, for street, highway and related purposes, the streets delineated thereon and the easements dedicated thereon for storm drain, sidewalk, street tree and landscape purposes. (Cross out what does not apply) NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest; and that the offers for dedication, easements and the final map delineating the same for said Tract Map No. 16554 is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR TRACT MAP 16554 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "72 Act"), said Landscape Maintenance District 1, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the 72 Act authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owner of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding the such provisions of the 72 Act related to the annexation of terhtory to the Maintenance District, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the maintenance Districts on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated heroin by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 72 Act to the annexation of the Temtory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and i /03 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 72 Act and/or Article XIIID applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amount snot to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The above recitals are all tree and correct SECTION 2: This City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determine in relationship to the. entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvements. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance ot: the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. 2 TR 16554 Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property To Be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: HL Homes Corporation The legal description of the Property is: THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH ONE-HALF OF LOT 5, SECTION 2, TOWNSHIF 1 SOUTH, RANGE 7 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP OF CUCAMONGA LANDS, RECORD IN BOOK 4 PAGE 9 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 4 OF TRACT NO. 11577, PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 175 PAGES 57 AND 58 OF MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, SAID POINT BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SA1D TRACT NO. 11577, SOUTH 89 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 50 SECONDS WEST, 240.54 FEET TO A POINT IN THE EAST LINE OF TRACT NO. 9449, PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 136 PAGES 99 AND 100 MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE ALONG SAID EAST L1NE, NORTH 0 DEGREES 15 MINUTES 18 SECONDS WEST, 340.17 FEET TO A POINT IN THE SOUTH LINE OF BASELINE AVENUE, A 120 FEET RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, NORTH 89 DEGREES 59 MINUTES 42 SECONDS EAST, 161.56 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 18 SECONDS WEST 17.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 59 MINUTES 42 SECONDS EAST, 55.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 18 SECONDS EAST, 17.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 24.00 FEET; A-1 TR 16554 THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 89 DEGREES 44 MINUTES 02 SECONDS 37.59 FEET TO THE END OF CURVE AND A POINT IN THE WEST LINE OF TURNER AVENUE, A 66 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE ALONG SAID WEST LINE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 16 MINUTES 16 SECONDS EAST, 316.01 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Assessor's Parcel No: 1077-041-57-0-000 The above described parcels are shown on sheet A-2 attached herewith and by this reference made a part hereof. A-2 TR 16554 Exhibit B To Descripfion of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2004/2005 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (GENERAL CITY): Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (LMD #1) represents 23.63 acres of landscape area, 41.88 acres of parks and 16.66 acres of community trails that are located at various sites throughout the City. These sites are not considered to be associated with any one particular area within the City, but rather benefit the entire City on a broader scale. As such, the parcels within this district do not represent a distinct district area as do the City's remaining LMD's. Typically parcels within this district have been annexed upon development The various sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, paseos, street trees, entry monuments, community trails and parks. The 41.88 acres of parks consist of Bear Gulch Park, East and West Beryl Park, Old Town Park, Church Street Park, Golden Oaks Park and the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): Street Light Maintenance District No. I (SLD #1) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (LOCAL STREETS): Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (SLD #2) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally, this area encompasses the residential area of the City west of Haven Avenue. It has been detetTained that the facilities in this district benefit this area of the City. This sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets generally west of Haven Avenue. B-I TR 16554 /~7~ Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2004/2005) For Project: TR 16554 Number of Lamps Street Lights 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L SLD # I --- 1 ......... SLD # 2 2 ............ Community Trail Turf Non-Turf Trees Landscaping DGSF SF SF EA LMD # 1 --- 4,190 2,320 12 *Existing items installed with original project Assessment Units by District Parcel DU S I S 2 L 1 6 6 6 6 B-2 TR 16554 /~ Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2004/2005 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (GENERAL CITY): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $92.21 for the fiscal year 2004/05. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City): # of Physical # of Rate Per Units Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Type Units Factor Units Unit ' Revenue Single Family Parcel 757 1.0 7951 $92.21 $733,161.71 Multi-Family Units 7091 0.5 3570 $92.21 $329,189.70 Comm/Ind. Acre 2 1.0 2 $92.21 $184.42 TOTAL $1,062,535.83 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 16554) is: 6 Parcels x 1 A.U. Factor x $92.21 Rate Per A.U. = $553.26 Annual Assessment C-1 TR 16554 STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2004/05. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Family Parcel 21,151 1.00 21,151 $I7.77 $375,853.27 Multi-Family Unit 8,540 1.00 8,540 $17.77 $151,755.80 Commercial Acre 2,380.36 2.00 4,760.72 $17.77 $84,597.99 TOTAL $612,207.06 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 16554) is: 6 Parcels x 1 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $106.62 Annual Assessment C-2 TR 16554 /~7 STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (LOCAL STREETS): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $39.97 for the fiscal year 2004/05. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Family Parcel 6050 1.00 6050 $39.97 $241,818.50 Multi Family Unit 24 1.00 919 $39.97 $36,732.43 Commercial Acre 19.05 2.00 19.05 $39.97 $1,522.86 Total $280,073.79 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 16554) is: 6 Parcels x 1 A.U. Factor x $39.97 Rate Per A.U. = $239.82 Annual Assessment C-3 TR 16554 /~ CERTIFICATE OF SUFFICIENCY CONSENT AND WAIVER TO ANNEXATION FOR TRACT MAP 16554 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1, STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WILLIAM J. O'NEIL, the undersigned, hereby certifies as follows: That I am the CITY ENGINEER of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. That on the __ day of 2005, I reviewed a Consent and Waiver to Annexation pertaining to the annexation of certain property to the Maintenance District, a copy of which is on file in the Office of the City Clerk. That I caused said Consent and Waiver to Annexation to be examined and my examination revealed that said Consent and Waiver to Annexation has been signed by the owners of all of the property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District. That said Consent and Waiver to Annexation meets the requirements of Section 22608.1 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. EXECUTED this __ day of 2005, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. CITY ENGINEER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA RAN H O C U C A M O N G A [~I~CI NI~I~ ~1 N G D 1~ P AI~ T I~ 1~ N T Staff Report DATE: March 16, 2005 TO:. Mayor and Members of the City Coundl Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Michael Ten Eyck, Administrative Resource Manager SUBJECT: Approve and authorize the execution of a Professional Services Agreement in the amount of $61,000 to Butsko Utility Design Inc., for system planning, design and inspection of Marketplace Properties and Victoria Gardens Southern Parcel within the · Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility service area to be funded $26,900 from t7053035650/1485705, $34,100 from 1705303565011487705 Municipal Utility Fund RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended the City Council authorize the execution of a Professional Services Agreement in the amount of $61,000 to Butsko Utility Design Inc., for system planning, design and inspection of Marketplace Properties and Victoda Gardens Southern Parcel within the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility service area to be funded $26,900 from 17053035650/1485705, $34,100 from 17053035650/1487705 Municipal Utility Fund BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: On August 31, 2001, the Rancho Cucemonga City Council authorized the creation and operation of a municipally owned utility for the purpose of providing vadous utility services to the Victoda Arbors Master Plan Area. A cdtical element of the City's plans to serve this area was the construction of an electrical distribution system to relay energy from the City's substation and interconnection with Southern California Edison's transmission system, located at the southeast comer of Rochester Avenue and Stadium Parkway, to the Victoda Arbors Master Plan area. The City's electrical distribution has been completed and is currently supply energy to the Victoda Garden Regional Shopping Center. With the electrical distribution currently providing energy to the Victoda Arbors Master plan Area; City is in the position to provide energy to additional nearby properties. Staff is CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT APPROVAL OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN, INC. FOR VARIOUS SERVICES RELATED TO THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY MARCH 16, 2005 PAGE 2 currently working with developers of the Route 66 parcel and Market Place Properties (s/e comer Day Creek and Base Line Rd.) to provide the energy needs of these developments. Both of these projects are currently in the preliminary construction phase by the developers. Staff identified specialized construction inspection and project management services that will be required dudng the construction phase of these projects and solicited proposals from Butsko Utility Design, Inc., the designer of the municipal utility distribution system, for such services. The services identified in the proposals represent an expanded scope of work associated with the design services previously rendered. As the designer of the distribution system, Butsko is uniquely qualified to provide inspection and project management services for these vitally important and time-sensitive projects. The developers of these projects are conditioned to be served by the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility and have already enlisted the services of a pdvate engineer to design the conduit and substructure system for their site. This portion of Rancho Cucemonga's ultimate electdc distribution system is outside of the scope of Butsko's odginal design that was limited to the Victoda Gardens Mall onsite system and the offsite system within Rochester Avenue, Foothill Boulevard and Day Creek Boulevard. It is recommended the City Council authorize the execution of a Professional Services Agreement in the amount of $61,000 to Butsko Utility Design Inc., for system planning, design and inspection of Marketplace Properties and Victoda Gardens Southern Parcel within the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility service area to be funded $26,900 from 17053035650/1485705, $34,100 from 17053035650/1487705 Munidpal Utility Fund. 'llia~J. O Nell City Engineer R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Sti ff Report DATE: March 16, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Robert Lemon, Management Analyst II SUBJECT: Approval of a Professional Services Agreement with Maximus in the amount of $50,200 to provide consulting services related to preparation of an Engineering Division User Fee Study and an Engineering Division Development Impact Fee Study, to be funded from Acct No. 10013055300 and approval of an appropriation of $50,200 to Acct. No. 10013055300 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council approve a Professional Services Agreement with Maximus in the amount of $50,200 to provide consulting services related to preparation of an Engineering Division User Fee Study and an Engineering Division Development Impact Fee Study, to be funded from Acct No. 10013055300 and approve of an appropriation of $50,200 to Acct. No. 10013055300. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The City of Rancho Cucamonga's Engineering Division has several development related fees currently in place for plan checking, map processing, and public works construction inspection services. These fees were last updated in 1989. It is prudent to periodically analyze these fees to ensure that the fees properly allocate costs fairly and equitably to users of the specified services. In keeping with this philosophy, staff solicited a proposal from Maximus to prepare an Engineering Department User Fee Study. The development of this study will create an updated empirical basis for cost allocation, ensure that the fee structure is supportable, defensible, and consistent with local, state, and federal cost recovery requirements, and create a fee structure that allows for future program changes. Maximus developed the user fee studies for the City of Rancho Cucamonga's recently adopted Planning and Building Division Fee Programs. Maximus is familiar with local government issues and practices, as well as the City of Rancho Cucamonga's specific needs and special circumstances. As such, Maximus is uniquely qualified to provide CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT APPROVAL OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH MAXtMUS FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES RELATED TO THE PREPARATION OF AN ENGINEERING DIVISION USER FEE STUDY MARCH 16, 2005 PAGE 2 consulting services related to preparation of an Engineering Division User Fee Study for the Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Division. The City of Rancho Cucamonga's Engineering Division also has several development impact fees currently in place for Park Development, Beautification (public landscaping), and General City Drainage Improvements. Similar to the Engineering user fees, the Park Development and Beautification fees have not been updated within the last decade. However, separate nexus studies for both the Park Development and Beautification Fee Programs have been prepared. The City's Drainage Fee Program was updated via Council approval in June 2002, however the approving resolution allows for the fee to be reviewed annually with the estimated construction costs increase by the applicable Engineering News Record Index. Staff solicited an additional proposal from Maximus to review the data and methodologies contained within these nexus studies, prepare a Development Impact Fee Program Review and Critique Report, prepare a recalibration of the City's Drainage Fee Program and, in combination with the Developer User Fee Study provide a comprehensive Engineering Division User Fee and Development Impact Fee Report. Maximus will act as the prime consultant and will enlist the services of TichlerBise, an expert firm in the area of development impact fees, for the scope of work covered by the second proposal request. The combined cost proposal submitted by Maximus for all work covered within the scope of both proposal requests is $50,200. It is recommended that Council approve a Professional Services Agreement with Maximus in the amount of $50,200 to provide consulting services related to preparation of an Engineering Division User Fee Study and an Engineering Division Development Impact Fee Study, to be funded from Acct No. 10013055300 and approve of an appropriation of $50,200 to Acct. No. 10013055300. Respectfully Submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Staff Report DATE: March 16, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Tasha Hunter, Public Service Tech I SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR TRACT 16454-1, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND ETIWANDA AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY KB HOME GREATER LOS ANGELES, INC. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract 16454-1 were approved by the City Council on February 4, 2004, in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $3,208,700.00 Labor and Material Bond: $1,604,350.00 Monumentation Cash Deposit $8,250.00 The size of the project and the delays in the acquisition of the Base Line permit has prevented the completion of the improvements within the one-year stipulated in the original Improvement Agreement. The developer, KB Home Greater Los Angeles, Inc., is requesting approval of a 12- month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's office. R,espebtively submitted, Willia~¢ J. O'Neil City"Engineer WJO:TCH Attachments February 17, 2005 Mr. Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer Engineering Division City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: Extension of Improvement Agreement for Tract 16454- I ,:CA, Dear Mr. James: KB Home requests an extension of the Improvement Agreement for Tract 16454~. The request is necessary in order to complete both in-tract and off site improvements. The size of the project and the delays in the acquisition of the Base Line ROW has prevented the completion of the improvements within the one year stipulated in the improvement Agreement. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. If you have any questions, please contact me at (909) 618-1449. Sincerely yours KB HOME Greater, Los Angeles Inc. ~enior roject Manager KB HOME INLAND VALLEY 801 CORPORATE CENTER DR. SUITE 201 ] POMONA, CA 91768 TEL 909 802 1100 FAX 909 802 1111 ; KBHOME.COM ,_VICINITY NOT 1'0 SCAL£ CITY OF ITEM: ~7"/1~ ~ '~ RAb/CI-IO CUCAiVIONGA TITLE: ~/t/~t'Aft ENGINEERING DIVISION EXHIBIT: RESOLUTION NO. ~"'/~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 16454-1 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on March 16, 2005, by KB Home Greater Los Angeles, Inc., as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located at the southeast corner of Base Line Road and Etiwanda Avenue; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Tract 16454-1; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. 117 I~ A N C H O C U C A M O N G A E N G I N E E I~ I N G D E P A R T M E N T Staff Report DA'rE: March 16, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Tasha Hunter, Public Service Tech I SUBJECT: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RETAIN THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE / LABOR & MATERIAL LE'FI'ER OF CREDIT FOR 6 MONTHS AFTER ACCEPTANCE, ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE CASH DEPOSIT AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2003-00072, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, BETWEEN 4TH AND 6TH STREET, SUBMITTED BY CALWEST INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES RECOMMENDATION: The required improvements for DRC2003-00072 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to retain the Faithful Performance / Labor & Material Letter of Credit for 6 months after acceptance and accept a Maintenance Guarantee Cash Deposit. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: As a condition of approval of completion of DRC2003-00072, located on the east side of Amhibald Avenue, between 4th and 6th Street, the applicant was required to complete street improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City Council retain the existing Faithful Performance / Labor & Material Letter of Credit and accept the Maintenance Guarantee Cash Deposit. Developer: Calwest Industrial Properties Accept: Cash Deposit Receipt# CR067627 $2,390.00 (Maintenance Guarantee) City Engineer WJO:TCH Attachment(s) 6TH STREET ~ ~.o,£¢~~ I Z < LOCATION ~I CR~:SCENT '~' (PARCEL MAP 7012) L C~_.~R DR. Z E. 4~ STREET ~ z Z ~ ~ 9 E. INLAND EMPIRE BLVD. ~ SAN BERNARDINO FWY. NORTH VIC~IITY MAP NOT TO SCALE CITY OF ITF_~: RANCHO CUCAMONGA Trm,~.: Pfc 2 ~ ~ - c~c~ 72 ~G~.u~o ~r~ON ~.~r: /1~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2003-00072 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for DRC2003-00072 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A E N G I N E E I~ I N G P E P A I~ T M E N ~ Staff Report DATE: March 16, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Tasha Hunter, Public Service Tech I SUBJECT: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND, ACCEPT A LETTER OF CREDIT IN AS THE MAINTENANCE BOND AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRCDR00-41, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 6TH STREET, WEST OF HAVEN, SUBMITTED BY CABOT INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES, L.P. RECOMMENDATION: The required improvements for DRCDR00-41 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond and accept a Letter of Credit as the Maintenance Bond. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: As a condition of approval of completion of DRCDR00-41, located on the south side of 6th Street, west of Haven, the applicant was required to complete street improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City Council release the existing Faithful Performance Bond and accept the Letter of Credit as the Maintenance Bond. Developer: Cabot Industrial Properties, L.P. Release: Letter of Credit #NZS518592 $698,000.00 (Bond No.) Accept: Letter of Credit #NZS538039 $69,800.00 (Bond No.) Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:TCH Attachment(s) I£1 CITY OF ITEM: ~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: ~ ENGINEERING DIVISION IZ£ RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRCDR00-41 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for DRCDR00-41 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with' the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Trade Services Division, Northern California One Front Street, 21~t Floor San Francisco, California 94111 Phone number: (800) 798-2815, Option 1 Irrevocable Letter of Credit Number NZS538039 Date: February 18, 2005 City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729 Attention: Daniel Toc ~ Bldg. & Safety Dept. Ladies and Gentlemen: We have been informed by the Applicant, but do not independently verify that this Letter of Credit is issued in connection with securities for Faithful Performance for Project DRCDR00-41, Engineering Reference ROW2004-00589.The preceding sentence is inserted in this Letter of Credit for informational purposes only and will not affect, or become a part of, the terms and conditions of this Letter of Credit. At the request and for the account of Calwest Industrial Properties, LLC (the "Applicant"), we hereby establish our Irrevocable Letter of Credit in your favor in the amount of Six Hundred Ninety Eight Thousand and NO/100 United States Dollars (US$69,800.00) available with us at our above office by payment of your draft(s) drawn on us at sight acbompanied by your signed and dated statement worded as follows: "The undersigned, an authorized representative of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), hereby certifies that the City is entitled under its agreement with Calwest Industrial Properties, LLC, related to securities for Faithful Performance for Project DRCDR00-41, Engineering Reference ROW2004-00589 to draw under Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Letter of Credit Number NZS538039." Each draft must be marked "Drawn under Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Letter of Credit Number NZS538039". If any instructions accompanying a drawing under this Letter of Credit request that payment is to be made by transfer to an account with us or at another bank, we and/or such other bank may rely on an account number specified in such instructions even if the number identifies a person or entity different from the intended payee. This Letter of Credit expires at our above office on February 28, 2006. 1 We undertake that your drafts when drawn under the terms and conditions of this Irrevocable Letter of Credit will be duly honored by us upon presentation. It is a condition of this Letter of Credit that the amount available to be drawn upon under this Letter of Credit will be decreased by means of an amendment upon our receipt of your written authorization (any such authorization, a "Decrease Authorization"). Any Decrease Authorization must quote this Letter of Credit by number, indicate the amount by which this Letter of Credit can be decreased and indicate that the person signing the Decrease Authorization is authorized to sign for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Any Decrease Authorization received by us will be considered as your consent to our amendment. This Letter of Credit is subject to the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits (1993 Revision), International Chamber of Commerce Publication Number 500, and engages us in accordance therewith. Very truly yours / By: Name: rozano Title: Assistant Vice PreSident 2 R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DATE: March 16, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Tasha Hunter, Public Svc. Tech I SUBJECT: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE CASH DEPOSIT FOR PM 15278, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BANYAN STREET AND LONDON AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY P.K.T. PROPERTIES, LLC RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Cash Deposit, for PM 15278, located on the southwest Corner of Banyan Street and London Avenue, submitted by P.K.T. Properties, LLC BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The required one-year maintenance period has ended, and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. DEVELOPER: P.K.T. Properties, LLC 15838 Aurora Crest Drive' Whittier, Ca 90605 Release: Cash Deposit Receipt #49247 $340.00 Respect?ully submitted, Witli~m J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:tch Attachment F T I ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT StaffRelx DA'I'E: March 16, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FR(X~: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Tasha Hunter, Public Svc. Tech I SUBJECT: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND FOR TRACT 14162, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 19TH STREET AT THE WESTERN CITY LIMIT, SUBMITTED BY PROMUS INVESTMENT NETWORK, INC. RECOMMENDATION it is recommended that City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond, for Tract 14162, located on the south side of 19th Street at the western city limit, submitted by Promus Investment Network, Inc. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The required one-year maintenance period has ended, and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. DEVELOPER Promus Investment Network, Inc. 3223 East Garvey North West Covina, Ca 91791 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond #1845472 $29,310.00 Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:tch Attachment ' CITV OF RANCHO CUCAMOI~GA R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DATE: March 16, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Tasha Hunter, Public Svc. Tech I SUBJECT: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND FOR TRACT 14494-1, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BANYAN STREET, WEST OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD, SUBMITTED BY US HOME CORPORATION RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond, for Tract 14494-1, located on the north side of Banyan Street, west of Day Creek Boulevard, submitted by US Home Corporation BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The required one-year maintenance period has ended, and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. DEVELOPER US Home Corporation 181 Old Spring Road Anaheim Hills, Ca 92808 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond #929240004 $51,5190.00 Respecff. ully submitted, , Willia~n O. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:tch Attachment BOUNDARY OF ANN~'XATiON NORTH ~ NTS CITY OF ITEM: Tract RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: Rancho Etiwanda ENGINEERING DIVISION EXHIBIT: Vicinity Map R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DATE: · March 16, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Tasha Hunter, Public Svc. Tech I SUBJECT: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BONDS FOR TRACT 15540, LOCATED BETWEEN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND ARROW ROUTE, EAST OF BAKER AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bonds, for Tract 15540, located between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Route, east of Baker Avenue, submitted by Van Daele Development Corporation BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The required one-year maintenance period has ended, and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. DEVELOPER Van Daele Development Corporation 2900 Adams Street, Suite C25 Riverside, Ca 92504-4378 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond #3SM 044 833 00-M $69,172.50 Maintenance Guarantee Bond #3SM 044 834 00-M $237,872.21 Maintenance Guarantee Bond #3SM 044 835 00-M $127,508.55 Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:tch Attachment · VICINITY MAP PROJECT AVEFiUE XRROY~ UPLAND CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOMGA I~ A N C H O C U C A M O N G A E N G I N E E R I N G D E P A I~ T M E N T Staff Report DATE: March 16, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Tasha Hunter, Public Service Tech I SUBJECT: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND, ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 16263, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND ELLENA WEST, SUBMITTED BY KB HOME GREATER LOS ANGELES, INC. RECOMMENDATION: The required improvements for Tract 16263 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond and accept a Maintenance Bond. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: As a condition of approval of completion of Tract 16263, located on the southeast corner of Base Line Road and Ellena West, the applicant was required to complete street improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City Council release the existing Faithful Performance Bond and accept the Maintenance Bond. Developer: KB Home Greater Los Angeles, Inc. Release: Faithful Performance Bond #400SF2161-02 $33,900.00 (Bond No.) Accept: Maintenance Bond #400SF2161-02 $3,390.00 (Bond No.) Release: Faithful Performance Bond #28 52 65 $124,200.00 (Bond No.) Accept: Maintenance Bond #28 52 65 $12,420.00 (Bond No.) ~ submitted, City Engineer WJO:TCH Attachment(s) VICINITy MAP :~OJECT SITE VICINITY MAP CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA /~" RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 16263 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 16263 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. R A N C H O C U C A M O N ® A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Staff Report DATE: March 16, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY- Jerry A. Dyer, Senior Civil Engineer ~) Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: ACCEPT THE MALL ON-SITE WATER AND SEWER OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2003-01, CONTRACT NO. 03-117 AS COMPLETE, RETAIN THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND AS A GUARANTEE BOND, RELEASE THE LABOR AND MATERIALS BOND AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $1,395,980.00 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council accept the Mall On-Site Water and Sewer of Community Facilities District 2003-01, Contract No. 03-117, as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion, retain the faithful Performance Bond as a Guarantee Bond, authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $1,275,114.00 six months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received and authorize the rele..~_ase of-the retention in the amount of $63,755.70, 35 days after acceptance. Also, approve the final contract amount of $1,395,980.00. BAC KG RO U N D/ANALYSIS The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The Mall On-Site Water and Sewer of Community Facilities District 2003-01 scope of work consisted of installing water distribution system, sanitary sewer mains, and appurtenant structures. Pertinent information of the project is as follows: > Budgeted Amount: $1,402,625.40 ~ Account Numbers: 16143035650/1442614-0 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Accept Mall On-Site Water & Sewer March 16, 2005 Page 2 Engineer's Estimate: $1,479,220.00 City Council's Approval to Advedise: August 6, 2003 Publish dates for local paper: August 11 & 14, 2003 Bid Opening: October 2, 2003 Contract Award Date: October 15, 2003 Low Bidder: Double D Pipeline, Inc. Contract Amount: $1,275,114.00 10% Contingency: $127,511.40 Final Contract Amount: $1,395,980.00 Difference in Contract Amount: $120,866.00 (9.48%) The net increase in the total cost of the project is a result of seven (7) contract change orders. The most notable changes that were significant to the increase were the raising or relocation of numerous fire hydrants to meet Cucamonga Valley Water District or Fire Department requirements and the upgrading of an 8-inch waterline to a 12-inch waterline. In order to stay on schedule with the Victoria Gardens Regional Mall the on-site waterline and fire hydrants were installed prior to the installation of curb and gutter. This resulted in many of the hydrants either having to be raised in height or relocated farther back behind curb to keep them from being hit. Respectfully submitted, City Engineer WJO:JAD/R©:Is Attachments VICINITY MAP COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO~2001-01 ON-SITE AND CULTURAL DRIVE WATER AND SEWER oo RESOLUTION NO. ~,~'ltC)~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COU~ICIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE MALL ON-SITE WATER AND SEWER OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2003-01, CONTRACT NO. 03-117 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the Mall On-Site Water and Sewer of Community Facilities District 2003-01, Contract No. 03-117, has been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Staff Report DATE: March 16, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Cindy Hackett, Associate Engineer(~ Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Technician~ SUBJECT: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND NO. 83 SB 104078528 BCM IN THE AMOUNT OF $35,260.01, FOR THE BANYAN STREET WIDENING FROM ROCHESTER AVENUE TO 2000' WEST, CONTRACT NO. 03-050 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond No. 83 SB 104078528 BCM in the amount of $35,260.01 for the Banyan Street Widening from Rochester Avenue to 2000' West, Contract No. 03-050. BAC KG ROU N D/ANALYSIS The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. Contractor: R.J. Noble Company 15505 E. Lincoln Avenue Orange, CA 92865 Respectfully submitted, City Engineer W JO:CH/Re:Is Attachments VICINITY MAP · PROJECT $ITEi~ ~~"li ~ ~ ,'1 \\ ! ~F--'~~ I'"" ='1 ~ ~ = ~/ ~~~ ~=. C~ OF ~C~O CUC~ONGA B~ S~EET ~E~G R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Staff Report DATE: March 16, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Michael TenEyck, Administrative Resources Manager SUBJECT: ACCEPT THE TEMP POWER POLE AND OVERHEAD WIRE INSTALLATION PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. 03-077 AS COMPLETE, APPROVAL OF A CHANGE ORDER IN THE AMOUNT OF $62,171.80 TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NO. 17053035650/1382705-0 FROM MUNICIPAL UTILITY FUND RETAIN THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND AS A GUARANTEE BOND, RELEASE LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $109,036.80 RECOMMENDATION Accept the Temp Power Pole and Overhead Wire Installation Project, Contract No. 03-077 as Complete, approval of a change order in the amount of $62,171.80 to be funded from Account No. 17053035650/1382705-0 from Municipal Utility fund retain the Faithful Performance Bond as a Guarantee Bond, release Labor and Material Bond and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $109,036.80 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The Temp Power Pole and Overhead Wire Installation Project scope of work consisted of the installation of temporary overhead wire 12ky electrical distribution system to provide construction power to the Victoria Gardens Regional Shopping Center. Pertinent information of the project is as follows: ~ Budget Amount: $39,480.00 ~ Account Number: 17053035650/1382705 ~ Engineer's Estimate: $45,000.00 ~ City Council's Approval to Advertise: Wednesday, July 02, 2093 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Accept Temp Power Pole and Overhead Wire Installation Project March 16, 2005 Page 2 Publish dates for local paper: July 03 and July 07, 2003 Bid Opening: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 at 2:00 PM Contract Award Date: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 Low Bidder: Pouk & Steinle, Inc. Contract Amount: $35,891.00 10% Contingency: $3,589.00 Final Contract Amount: $109,036.80 Difference in Contract Amount: $73,145.80 Increase The net increase in the total cost is a result of two (2) change orders for various relocations of temp power poles items that were necessary to provide construction power to the Victoria Garden Regional Sopping Center project. Notable changes that were significant to the increase were the installation of additional temp overhead power lines and relocation of temp power poles with the project limits.. Respectfully submitted, City Engineer W JO:CH/Re:Is Attachments Iqq RESOLUTION NO. ~) 5"'/O~I~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING ACCEPT THE TEMP POWER POLE AND OVERHEAD WIRE INSTALLATION PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. 03-077 AS COMPLETE, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the Temp Power Pole and Overhead Wire Installation Project, Contract No. 03-077 has been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTMEN~ Staff Report DATE: March 16, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Jerry A. Dyer, Senior Civil Engineer ~/ Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Technician -~ SUBJECT: ACCEPT THE PHASE lB(E) OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2001-01, INCLUDING LANDSCAPING AND AMENITIES ON ARBOR LANE, CONTRACT NO. 04-069 AS COMPLETE, RETAIN THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND AS A GUARANTEE BOND, RELEASE THE LABOR AND MATERIALS BOND AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $1,664,586.54 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council accept the 'Phase lB(e) of Community Facilities District 2001-01, Including Landscaping and Amenities on Arbor Lane, Contract No. 04-069, as complete, euthorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion, retain the faithful Performance Bond as a Guarantee Bond, authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $1,633,775.13 six months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received and authorize the release of the retention in the amount of $166,456.65, 35 days after acceptance. Also, approve the final contract amount of $1,664,566.54. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The Phase lB(e) of Community Facilities District 2001-01, Including Landscaping and Amenities scope of work consisted of installing hardscape, landscaping, sidewalk and cobble, and constructing an arbor and gazebo. Pertinent information of the project is as follows: > Budgeted Amount: $1,797,154.23 > Account Numbers: 16123035650/1442612-0 CiTY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Accept Phase lB(e) of Community Facilities District 2001-01, Arbor Lane Landscape March 16, 2005 Page 2 > Engineer's Estimate: $1,066,391.00 > City Council's Approval to Advertise: April 7, 2004 > Publish dates for local paper: April 13 & 20, 2004 > Bid Opening: June 1,2004 > Contract Award Date: June 16, 2004 > Low Bidder: Ecology Construction, Inc. ~- Contract Amount: $1,633,776.57 10% Contingency: $163,377.66 >- Final Contract Amount: $1,664,586.54 > Difference in Contract Amount: $30,809.97 (1.69%) The net increase in the total cost of the project is a result of five (5) contract change orders. The most notable changes that were significant to the increase were clean up and plant replacement costs resulting from a severe windstorm, additional pavement demolition including sandbag placement in preparation for street openings to construction traffic on Church Street, Penford Drive and Arbor Lane, and additional linear footage of retaining wall and PCC curbing. Respectfully submitted, W~. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:JAD/RO:Is Attachments .. ~ ,~ . ~?~C~'' ~ ': PHASE lB(E) OF CFI) 2001-01 INCLUDING LANDSCAPING AND AMENITIES ON ARBOR LANE ~ ~ OF. RANC~0:~CUCAMONGA RESOLUTION NO. ~:~--/1~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PHASE lB(E) OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2001-01, INCLUDING LANDSCAPING AND AMENITIES ON ARBOR LANE, CONTRACT NO, 04-069 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the Phase lB(e) of Community Facilities District 2001-01, Including Landscaping and Amenities on Arbor Lane, Contract No. 04-069, has been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. T H C I T Y 0 F I~AN Cl~ 0 CUCAMONGA Memomnd DATE: March 16, 2005 TO: Mayor and City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Erica Darplee, Management Ar/alyst I SUBJECT: PRESENTATION OF THE 2005/2006 ENGINEER'S REPORTS ENCOMPASSING THE PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-85), LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS AND THE STREET LIGHTING DISTRICTS, WHICH DENOTE CURRENT ASSESSMENT RATES AND THE RECOMMENDED RATES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006. I am pleased to present this year's edition of the Annual Engineer's Reports. All of the information presented in this report reflects the current status of the assessment districts citywide including their operating budgets, service areas and proposed assessment rates. At this time staff is recommending all assessment rates stay at their current levels. Please feel free to contact my office with any questions or inquiries as to the data contained in these reports. You can reach me at (909) 477-2740 ext. 4011. cc: Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager Robert Lemon, Management Analyst II Don Gentry, Maintenance Supervisor Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2005/2006 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City) ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT RanchoCucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year 2005/2006, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bemardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 16th day of March, 2005. Approved by: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW ..................................................... .................................. 4 SECTION 1 - DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS ................................. 5 SECTION 2 - ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES ..........................18 SECTION 3 - METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT ............... 19 A. GENERAL .................................................................. 19 B. ASS ESSMENT METHODOLOGY .................................... 19 C. ASSESSMENT ............................................................ 20 SECTION 4 - ANNEXATIONS ............................................................ 21 SECTION 5 - ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS ............................................ 22 Overview The FY 2005/2006 Annual Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Light Act of 1972). Section 1 Description of Improvements The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Assessment District consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for FY 2005/2006, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discuses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for FY 2005/2006, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to the Landscape Maintenance District within Calendar year 2004. Section 5 Assessment Diagrams Shows the boundaries of the areas to be annexed to the Landscape Maintenance District No. I and the general boundaries of the District. For details regarding the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within the Landscape Maintenance District No. 1, refer to the San Bernardino County Assessor's maps. Section 1 - Description of Improvements: Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (LMD #1) represents 22.30 acres of landscape area, 1.31 acres of turf, 41.88 acres of parks and 17.98 acres of community trails, which ara located at various sites throughout the City. These sites are not considered to be associated with any one particular area within the City, but rather benefit the entire City on a broader scale. As such, the parcels within this district do not represent a distinct district area as do the City's remaining LMD's. Typically parcels within this district have been annexed upon development The various sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, paseos, street trees, entry monuments, community trails and parks. The 41.88 acres of parks consist of Bear Gulch Park, East and West Beryl Park, Old Town Park, Church Street Park, Golden Oaks Park and the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 SITE LOCATIONS Site # Descriptive Locations A-1 The north and south side of Wilson from Hellman to Amethyst. Ground Cover area: 22,982 square feet A-2 The east side of Hellman from 326 feet south of Pepperidge to 73 feet north of Pepperidge. Ground Cover area: 5,810 square feet A-3 The south side of 19th Street from 62 feet east of Mayberry to 173 feet east of Mayberry. Ground Cover area: 1,680 square feet A-4 The south side of Wilson from Amethyst to Archibald; the planters and cutouts on the west side of Amhibald from Wilson to 105 feet south of Cottonwood. Ground Cover area: 5,625 square feet A-5 The north and south side of Diamond Court from Klusman to Diamond Ave. Ground Cover area: 3,143 square feet 5 A-6 The parkway on the north side of Wilson from 348 feet east of Moming Canyon to Alder Ridge. Ground Cover area: 5,700 square feet A-7 The cutouts and vines on the south side of Wilson from the Alta Loma Channel to 240 feet east of Zapata. Ground Cover area: 911 square feet A-8 The east side of Broken Star from 80' south of Highland to Highland; the north side of Highland from Amethyst to Broken Star including wood chip area north of sidewalk, the south side of Highland from Broken Star to Amethyst; the west side of Amethyst from 140 feet south of Highland to 265 feet south of Highland. Ground Cover area: 16,870 square feet A-9 The south side of Highland from Hellman ~o Broken Star. Ground Cover area: 7,865 square feet A-10 The south side of 19th from 170 feet west of Pilgrim to 167 feet east of Pilgrim. Ground Cover area: 1,808 square feet A- 11 The east side of Amethyst from Lemon to 230 feet north of Apricot Ground Cover area: 2,115 square feet A-12 The west side of Sapphire from 710 feet north of Hillside to Hillside. Ground Cover area: 4,500 square feet A-13 The south side of Victoria from 110 feet west of London to Ramona. Ground Cover area: 2,705 square feet A-14 The west side of Archibald from 273 feet north of La Gloria to Lemon; the La Gloria median from Archibald to Jadeite; the north and south side of La Gloria from Archibald to 53 feet east of Jadeite; the north side of Lemon from Archibald to 55 feet east of Klusman. Ground Cover area: 12,880 square feet A-15 The planters and cutouts on the east side of Archibald from 610 feet south of Cottonwood to Wilson; the south side of Wilson from Archibald to Alta Loma Channel. Ground Cover area: 2,110 square feet A-16 The cutouts and planters on the east side of Archibald from Banyan to 190 feet north of Sunflower. Ground Cover area: 1,580 square feet A-17 The cutouts and planters on the west side of Archibald from 225 feet south of Wilson to Banyan. Ground Cover area: 2,362 square feet 6 A-18 The cutouts and planters on the north side of Banyan from Jadeite to 410 feet west of Jadeite. Ground Cover area: 216 square feet A-19 The cutouts and planters on the east side of Amethyst from 192 feet south of Sunflower to Manzanita. Ground Cover area: 4,325 square feet A-20 The west side of Amhibald from 210 feet north of La Colina to 230 feet south of Almond; the south side of La Colina from Archibald to Jadeite. Ground Cover area: 17,120 square feet A-21 The planter adjacent to the equestrian trail from Riverwood to Raspberry north of the County flood retention basin that is west of Chaffey College. Ground Cover area: 22,832 square feet A-22 The west side of Haven from Carrari to Vista Grove. Ground Cover area: 4,572 square feet A-23 The west side of Haven from 434 feet north of Manzanita to 258 feet south of Manzanita. Ground Cover area: 48,390 square feet Turf area: 5,868 square feet A-24 The south side of 19th from 286 feet east of Amethyst to 166 feet west of Klusman. Ground Cover area: 5,904 square feet A-25 The equestrian trail and planters on the east side of Hermosa from 421 feet south of Whispering Forest to Sun Valley. Ground Cover area: 17,529 square feet A-26 The west side of Haven from 630 feet north of Wilson to Wilson; the parkway on the north side of Wilson from Haven to Mayberry; the parkway on the east side of Mayberry from Wilson to 382 feet north of Poplar, and the east and west side of Cartilla from Wilson to Poplar. Ground Cover area: 35,540 square feet A-27 The north side of 19th from Mayberry to 93 feet east of Castle Gate. Ground Cover area: 5,145 square feet A-28 The east side of Hermosa from 360 feet south of Manzanita to Manzanita, and the south side of Manzanita from Hermosa to Raspberry. Ground Cover area: 7,421 square feet 7 A-29 The south side of Wilson from 240 feet west of Timbermist to Hermosa; the west side of Hermosa from Wilson to 213 feet south of Oak Grove. Ground Cover area: 11,184 square feet A-30 The equestrian trail and plant material from the curb to the tract wall on the west side of Hermosa from 118 feet south of Hillside to 160 feet south of Waterford. Ground Cover area: 12,132 square feet A-31 The south side of Lemon from London to Calle Hermosa. Ground Cover area: 4,404 square feet A-32 The north side of Lemon from the Alta Loma Channel to London; the east side of London from Lemon to Cypress. Ground Cover area: 4,463 square feet A-33 The parkway on the east side of London from 158 feet north of Banyan to 310 feet north of Banyan. Ground Cover area: 1,029 square feet A-34 The south side of Alta Loma from Mayberry to Revere. Ground Cover area: 2,772 square feet There was 1,512 square feet of ground cover deleted from this site 7-1-00 A-35 The west side of Hermosa from Lemon to 125 feet north of Highland, the parkway on the south side of Lemon from 621 feet west of Hermosa to Hermosa. Ground Cover area: 10,494 square feet A-36 The south side of Lemon from 385 feet west of Mayberry to Cartilla. Ground Cover area: 4,850 square feet A-37 The south side of Hillside north and south of the equestrian trail from Beryl to 203 feet east of Eastwood. Ground Cover area: 4,900 square feet A-38 The median in the 9200 block of Monte Vista Ground Cover area: 500 square feet A-39 The south side of Almond from Henry to Sapphire; the west side of Sapphire from Almond to 255 feet south of Bella Vista. Ground Cover area: 6,926 square feet A-40 The parkway on the east side of Jasper from Hunter to Highland; the parkway on the south side of Highland from Jasper to Carnelian; the west side of Carnelian from Highland to 210 feet south of Highland. 8 Ground Cover area: 14,858 square feet A-41 The west side of Sapphire from 236 feet north of Thoroughbred to Banyan. Ground Cover area: 2,656 square feet A-42 The parkway on the west side of Beryl from 132 feet north of Sunflower to 23 feet north of Sunflower; and from Sunflower to Banyan. Ground Cover area: 4,735 square feet A-43 The north side of Base Line from Topaz to the Cucamonga Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 4,563 square feet 9 A-44 The cutouts on the west side of Sapphire from Banyan to Marble. Ground Cover area: 7,300 square feet A-45 The mainline for this site was connected to A-46 9-8-99. A-46 The south side of Banyan from North star to Zircon. Ground Cover area: 7,448 square feet A-47 The cutouts and vines on the north side of Banyan from 180 feet east of Zircon to 186 feet west of Vineyard. Ground Cover area: 1,300 square feet A-48 The parkway on the west side of Beryl from 452 feet north of Cielito; 158 feet south of Cielito and the easement between 9063 and 9073 Cielito from Cielito to 170 feet south of Cielito. Ground Cover area: 6,916 square feet A-49 The east side of Carnelian from 662 feet south of Banyan to Banyan; the south side of Banyan from Carnelian to Northstar. Ground Cover area: 5,906 square feet A-50 The north side of Almond from Sapphire to Crest View; the east and west side of Skyline from Almond to 595 feet north of Almond. Ground Cover area: 17,600 square feet A-51 The planter adjacent to the equestrian trail; from Haven to Riverwood, north of County flood retention basin, west of Chaffey College. The west side of Haven from 400 feet north of Amber To 270 feet south of Amber. Ground Cover area: 37,977 square feet A-52 The east side of Riverwood, from 188 feet south of Charwood to 193 feet north of Charwood. Ground Cover ama: 2,750 square feet A-53 The west side of Jasper from Hunter to Highland. The south side of Highland from Jasper to 308 feet west of Sard. The east and westside of Sard from Highland to Hunter. Ground Cover area: 7,445 square feet A-54 The west side of Beryl from 233 feet north of Mignonette to Mignonette. Ground Cover area: 2,637 square feetMareh 16, 2005 A-55 The northside of 19th from Cartilla to Mayberry. The eastside of Mayberry from 19th to Heather. Ground Cover area: 8,410 square feet 10 A-56 The eastside of Beryl from 410 feet north of Wilson to Wilson The north side of Wilson from Beryl to 731 feet west of Buckthom. The south side of Wilson from Buckthom to Beryl. Ground Cover area: 19,708 square feet A-57 The eastside of Hermosa From 115 north of Coca To 451 feet north of Coca. The trail north of water retention basin from Hermosa to 619 feet east of Hermosa. Ground Cover area: 9,406 square feet A-58 The Westside of Haven from 510 feet south of Victoria to 1005 feet south of Victoria. Ground Cover area: 7,301 square feet A-59 The eastside of Archibald from 820 feet south of Lemon to 448 feet south of Lemon and continues from 275 feet south of Lemon to 185 feet south of Lemon. Ground Cover area: 4,777 square feet A-60 The south side of Lemon from 290 feet east of Archibald to London. The West side of London from Lemon to Orange. Ground Cover area: 2,569 square feet A-61 The north side of Carrari from Archibald to London. Ground Cover area: 25,152 square feet A-62 The eastside of Archibald from Carrari to 505 feet north of Meadowood. Ground Cover area: 8,626 square feet. A-63 The southside of Almond street from Carriage to Almond Ground Cover area: 3,342 square feet. A-64 The east side of Beryl from Cottonwood to Wilson. The south side of Wilson from Beryl to 437 feet east of Beryl. The north side of Wilson from Cousins to 474 feet east of Cousins. Ground Cover area: 11,973 square feet. A-65 The eastside of Archibald from LaGloria to 328 feet north of LaGloria. Ground Cover area: 2,279 Square feet. A-66 The eastside of Hermosa from Waterford to 500 feet north of Waterford. Ground Cover area: 4,695 Square feet. A-67 The Southside of 19th from 220 feet east of Sapphire to Via Serena. Ground Cover area: 3,208 Square feet. 11 B-1 The median on Blue Gum from Etiwanda to Blue Gum Court. Ground Cover area: 5,100 square feet B-2 The north side of 19th from Highland to Palm; the west and east side of Alameda from 19th to Ring; the east side of Palm from 19th to Ring. Ground Cover area: 22,550 square feet B-3 The paseo from SuRer Ct. to Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 294 square feet B-4 The north side of Banyan from Deer Creek Channel to 355 feet west of Fredericksburg. Ground Cover area: 9,200 square feet B-5 The north side of Lemon from Semillion to 188 feet west of Terracina. Ground Cover area: 14,472 square feet B-6 The north side of Lemon from Barsac to Semillion. Ground Cover area: 15,784 square feet B-7 The south side of Banyan from Cabemet to 414 feet east of Cabemet. Ground Cover area: 18,814 square feet B-8 The south side of Banyan from Callaway to Muscat. Ground Cover area: 10,505 square feet B-9 The east side of Haven from Banyan to 240 feet north of Banyan; the north side of Banyan from Haven to Merlot. Ground Cover area: 24,975 square feet B-10 The east side of Haven from 400 feet south of Banyan to Banyan; the south side of Banyan from Haven to Callaway. Ground Cover area: 14,548 square feet B-11 The south side of Banyan from Muscat to Cabernet. Ground Cover area: 33,282 square feet B-12 The north side of Lemon from Barsac to 135 feet east of Valinda. Ground Cover area: 13,464 square feet B-13 The south side of 19th from Inyo to 585 feet east of San Benito; the parkways on the east and west side of San Benito from 19th to San Mateo; the east side of Inyo from 19th to paseo south of 19th and the paseo running east from Inyo to Sonora. Ground Cover area: 17,563 square feet Turf area: 3,387 square feet 12 B-14 The paseo from San Benito and Sonora to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 2,000 square feet B-15 The paseo from Stanislaus and Lavine to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 1,040 square feet B-16 The paseo from Inyo to Mendocino. Ground Cover area: 225 square feet B-17 The paseo from Yuba Ct. to Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 918 square feet B-18 The south side of Wilson from 377 feet west of Canistel to 1032 feet east of Canistel. Ground Cover area: 6,762 square feet B-19 The east side of Haven from the Southern Pacific Railroad to 341 feet south of Victoria. Ground Cover area: 6,415 square feet B-20 The east side of Haven from 341 feet south of Victoria to Victoria; the south side of Victoria from Haven to 237 feet east of Mango. Ground Cover area: 16,900 square feet B-21 The south side of 19th from Valinda to Inyo. Ground Cover area: 3,900 square feet B-22 The south side of Lemon south of the sidewalk from 188 feet west of Terracina to 284 feet north of Marbella. The parkway on the south side of Lemon from 188 feet west of Terracina to 517 feet north of Marbella. The turf in the parkway at the end of the cul-de-sac on Sonterra Court. The parkway on the north side Lemon from 188 feet west of Terracina to 526 feet south of Terracina. The northside of Lemon north of the sidewalk from 188 feet west of Terracina to 562 feet south of Terracina. The turf in the parkway at the end of the cul-de-sac at Serena Street. Ground Cover area: 17,688 square feet. Turf Area: 6,390 square feet. B-23 The parkway on the east side of Lemon from 129 feet south of Marbella to 526 feet south of Terracina. The slope On the east side of Lemon east of the sidewalk from 129 feet south of Marbella to 562 feet south of Terracina. The west side of Lemon west of the sidewalk from 284 feet north of Marbella to 129 feet south of Marbella. The parkway on the west side of Lemon from 517 feet north of Marbella to 129 feet south of Marbella. Ground Cover area: 22,531 square feet. There was 11,844 square feet of ground cover deleted from this site 7-1-00. 13 B-24 The south side of Highland from 327 feet west Deer Creek Channel to Deer Creek Channel. The paseo from Los Osos to Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 4,946 square feet. B-25 The south side of Banyan from 152 feet west of Cantabria to 930 feet east of Cantabria. Ground Cover area: 16,693 square feet. B-26 The north side of Wilson from 590 feet west of High Meadow Place to 187 feet east of High Meadow Place. Ground Cover area: 4,628 Square feet 14 C-1 The north side of 26th from Andover to Hermosa; the east side of Hermosa from 26th to 331 feet north of Concord. Ground Cover area: 12,804 square feet Turf area: 9,423 square feet C-2 The entry monument on the north east and northwest comers of 4th and Archibald. Ground Cover area: 5,860 square feet Turf area: 5,546 square feet C-3 The south side of Base Line from Ramona to 128 feet east of Cambridge. Ground Cover area: 17,262 square feet C-4 The south side of Base Line from 440 feet west of Ramona to Ramona. Ground Cover area: 6,198 square feet C-5 The south side of Base Line from 340 feet west of Center to 103 feet east of Center. Ground Cover area: 8,850 square feet C-6 The south side of Base Line from Ivy to 105 feet west of Marine. Ground Cover area: 8,080 square feet C-7 The parkway on the north side of Church from 142 feet east of Teak to 230 feet west of Teak. Ground Cover area: 1,813 square feet C-8 The west side of Hermosa from 524 feet north of Palo Alto to 142 feet south of Palo Alto. Ground Cover area: 2,650 square feet C-9 The parkway on the west side of Hermosa from 163 feet north of Ironwood to 145 feet south of Ironwood. Ground Cover area: 1,500 square feet C-10 The entry monument parkway on the south side of Base Line from the western city limit to Alta Cuesta. Ground Cover area: 9,756 square feet C- 11 The parkway on the east side of Beryl from Alder to 135 feet north of Culpepper. Ground Cover area: 3,400 square feet C-12 The parkway on the east side of Hellman from Tryon to 665 feet north of Tryon. Ground Cover area: 8,280 square feet 15 C-13 The parkway on the west side of Hellman from 500 feet north of Church to Church. Ground Cover area: 2,416 square feet C-14 The eastside of Archibald from 196 feet north of Palo Alto to 530 feet north of Palo Alto. Ground Cover area: 4,262 square feet C- 15 The north side of San Bemardino from Summerlin to 225' west of Stunmerin. Ground Cover area: 1,660 square feet 16 D-1 The east side of Rochester from Church to Base Line. Ground Cover area: 11,126 square feet Turf area: 16,794 square feet D-2 The east side of Rochester from 146 feet south of Chervil to Church St. Ground Cover area: 11,908 square feet Turf area: 9,950 square feet Ground cover, shrubs and turf areas that make up parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. Parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews 17 Section 2 - Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The budgeted costs for LMD #1 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover, shrubs and the neighborhood park. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing, are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #1 are as follows: Personnel Regular Payroll $90,550.00 Pad-time Salaries $35,030.00 Fringe Benefits $47,520.00 Subtotal Personnel $173,100.00 Operations Maintenance and Operations $64,520.00 Facilities Operations & Maintenance $16,900.00 Vehicle Maintenance and Operations $3,000.00 Emergency & Routine Vehicle Equipment Rental $1,000.00 Equipment Maintenance $4,800.00 Utilities Water Utilities $154,000.00 Telephone Utilities $4,000.00 Electric Utilities $47,250.00 Contract Services - Trees $53,870.00 Contract Services Parkway & Median Landscape Maintenance $448,550.00 Park Landscape Maintenance $228,760.00 Tree Maintenance $3,150.00 CVWD Manditor~ Annual Backflow Cert. $4,500.00 Contract Services - Facilities $19,000.00 Subtotal Operations $1,053,300.00 Capital Expenditures Outlay/Equipment $16,000.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $16,000.00 Capital Project $40,000.00 $40,000.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead $136,480.00 Total LMD #1 Expenditure Budget $1,418,880.00 Less Prior Year District Carryover $295,347.25 Assessment Revenue Required $1,123,532.75 Section 3 - Method of AsSessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishments of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment distdct may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects · the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one The Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDU's based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single-family home (SFR). The EDU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EDU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS Property Type EDU Value Multiplier Non-Residential Improved 2.00 Acres Single Family Residential 1.00 Unit It is recommended that the rate per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) remain at $92.21 for the FY 2005/2006. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: # of # of Rate per Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Type Units Unit Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Family Parcel 8115 1.0 8115 $92.21 $748,284.15 Multi-Family Parcel 8135 0.5 4067.5 $92.21 $375,064.18 Comm/Ind Acre 2 1.0 2 $92.21 $184.42 Total $1,123,532.75 C. Assessment All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2005/2006, and describes each assessable lot or pamel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. 20 Section 4 - Annexations: Calendar Year 2004 Annexations Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 PROJECT UNITS ANNEX DATE DRC 2002-00499 264 MF 2/18/2004 TR 16432 28 SF 3/3/2004 PM 16245 467 MF 3/17/2004 TR 16430 23 SF 7/21/2004 TTR 16545 10 SF 8/4/2004 TR 16421 8 SF 9/15/2004 TR 16274 7 SF 9/15/2004 PM 16482 2 SF 10/20/2004 PM 16038 4 SF 11/17/2004 Section 5 - Assessment Diagrams: EXHIBIT ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTR/cT NO. ! STREET L/GHTfNG MAINTENANC£ DISTRICT NOS. ! AND 2 120~15.26 sq. fl. Q.278 ac. ~ ~ LE~EMD CITY OF ~NCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BE~A~INO STATE O EXHIBIT "A" ' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE D/STRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOg. ! AND 2 f E ts~..u,~, ~/~-sT. (S ag'~'~' g e~e~') ~a~.~ ~CT ~. 16274 ,.. '~ LOOP LOOP ~ 'LOOP 7 ~ ~ ,~o.~s' ~.~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY' OF SAN BERNAt~INO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTR/CT NOS. I AND 2 ..;~-,t_-? ' . -'- ".'- ST/~E~T l-I~/.-/T~ 5-~. · '/£ ~ .... CITY O¥ RANCHO CUCAMOb/GA st^tr, or EXHIBIT "A" ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ~ LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 2 ~ · BANYAN 0 STREET 5 6 4 ? '. , 3 8 2 '.~1, 9 ' ~ ~ 10 T~ACT LEGEND ~ -5800 L ~T~ET CITY OF ~NCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN B~A~INO ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. i AND 2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NORTI! COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO /~7 EXHIBIT "A" ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. i AND 2 TRACT 16430 LMD AREA--xxxxx CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NORI'~t COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 7,~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO . ST~ET LIG~G MA~ENANCE - ~ , , - ........... ~__ :, , h ' F - ,, ....... CIVIC cITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NORTU COUNTY OF R~N R~ONS EXHIBIT"A" ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE IVIAINTEN~kNCE DISTRICT biO. 3B STREET LIGHTING MAR'/TENAIVCE DISTRICT NOS. Izl 6TH ST. " Z PROdECT LOCATION " 4TH ST, ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NOa COUNTY OFSAN BERNAROINO 'r~ ~7 "~ LEHOi¢ AV iii ' . ? F~l~4nl~ ~'1 210 . ,. I~TH 51' V'I G I N I T"ff HAP N T CITY OF ITEM: ~>,~agZ00~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA rtr~.E: V/c/Htr'r' ENGINEERING DIVISION EXHIBIT: EXHIBIT "A- Z'~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MA~TENANCE DISTracT NO. I STYET L1GHT~G MAINTEN~CE DIST~CT NOS. I AND 2 ~..:..~ .~:~_-~-:.~..Z-~_:~-_-<-~-.~.~_-- :.--~_.~.~'._~ ~ .~-~:~ -~ ~ --.-~..~ ................ .~-~-- t --_ ~'~'-~:~ l._: ....... .ll..~.--ll,----:.--.~ ...... ..... .- ...:.-::~'-' -- .~' V ~_~ ~:.- [~. . . ..... ' ::' ' ' '-2 ' '~' ~ "~ ..~' : t ~ "~' ...... ~- .-'" ,' ...' ~ ,- ........~ ? '"' "': ...... : .... M ' 2 .-'" ' " ~ :' .. ~..--' ,~ . ~ .~ ~ ,, ; / --' ; -' ':,'-.d it ~' -' ~,- ::~ -" ' '-~- ~- ·- D~VE' ._~. ............ ~ - __ _ ~ .... .... ~ _ -~. ~ ...- .-? - _ .... ~'-"~ .- . ':: ~ .' r:.;- ~ ~ ,'.' , ' ......... , ~ -' ~... : .,-. >'"1 :~ ---:-~ :~-.-..:-.~,'1 '~ ffTle~/[T LIGHTS /4 ~T~EET T~ No~,l- Tu~ff ~A ~,~ CITY OF ~NCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN B~ARDINO STATE OF CALIFODNIa T~. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAIIffI'EI~ANC£ DISTRICT NO. STREET LiGHTiNG MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 · ~ S'~"r ~'~"'"'"~"~' '"' '"~ . . , ,:~ .,-.~:~;.. ~ '~... ~~ "' .~ ...,-. ~ -":i .~:~ -t ' ~z .'.;-'~? CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 80,Ti,/~p COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO e~v ~ CALIFO~IA Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2005/2006 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Victoria Planned Community) ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Victoria Planned Community) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year 2005/2006, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 16th day of March, 2005. Approved by:. William J. O'Neil, City Engineer 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW ....................................................................................... 4 SECTION 1 - DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS ................................. 5 SECTION 2 - ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES .......................... SECTION 3 - METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT ............... 19 A. GENERAL .................................................................. 19 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY .................................... 19 C. ASSESSMENT ............................................................ 20 SECTION 4 - ANNEXATIONS ............................................................ 21 SECTION 5 - ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS ............................................ 22 Overview The FY 2005/2006 Annual Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Victoria Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Light Act of 1972). Section 1 Description of Improvements The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Assessment District consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for FY 2005/2006, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discuses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for FY 2005/2006, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to the Landscape Maintenance District within Calendar year 2004. Section 5 Assessment Diagrams Shows the boundaries of the areas to be annexed to the Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 and the general boundaries of the District. For details regarding the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within the Landscape Maintenance District No. 2, refer to the San Bernardino County Assessor's maps. Section 1 - Description of Improvements: Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (LMD #2) represents landscape sites throughout the Victoria Planned Community. These sites are associated with areas within Victoria and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that community. Because of this, assessments required for this distri'ct are charged to those parcels within that planned community. The sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, street trees, paseos, community trails and parks. The 32.37 acres of parks in Victoria consist of Kenyon Park, Victoria Groves Park, Vintage Park, Windrows Park and Ellena Park. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: SCHEDULE V-A LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 SITE LOCATIONS Site # Descriptive Locations 2-1 Arbor Lane from Church to Cul-de-sac at the roundabout. The frontage for the park not part of the site. Ground Cover area: 59,132 square feet VW-1 Base Line median from Victoria Park Lane to 830 feet west of Victoria Park Lane. Ground Cover area: 4,514 square feet VW-2 The north side of Base Line, 300 feet east and west of Swanson; the east and west sides of Swanson from Base Line to Province; the paseo from the intersection of Swanson and Province to Atwood with outlet to Dunmore; the pasco from Atwood to the Southern Pacific Railroad; the north side of Saratoga from Powell to Dunmore; the paseo from Saratoga to Etiwanda; the south side of Atwood from Victoria Park Lane to Travis; the north side of Atwood from Walcott to Victoria Park Lane. Ground Cover area: 18,753 square feet Turf area: 73,931 square feet VW-3 The Victoria Park Lane median and the west and east side parkways from Base Line to the entrance to Victoria Village. Ground Cover area: 24,453 square feet Turf area: 2,637 square feet VW-4 The Victoria Park Lane median and the west and east side parkways from Victoria Village entrance to Atwood. .Ground Cover area: 30~695 square feet Turf area: 10,242 square feet VW-5 The Victoria Park Lane median and the west side and east side parkways from Atwood to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 49~513 square feet VW-6 The paseo running north from 12732 Farrington to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 285 square feet VW-7 The paseo running north from 12840 Farrington to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 266 square feet VW-8 The Victoria Park Lane median and the west side parkway from the Southern Pacific Railroad to South Victoria Windrows Loop. The Victoria Park Lane east side parkway from the Southern Pacific Railroad to Zinnia Ct. Ground Cover area: 40,548 square feet VW-9 The Victoria Park Lane east side parkway from Barberry to North Victoria Windrows Loop at Windrows Park. Ground Cover area: 9~188 square feet Turf area: 3~851 square feet VW-10 The west side of Victoria Park Lane from South Victoria Windrows Loop to Dahlia Ct.; the Victoria Park Lane median from Zinnia Ct., to Dahlia Ct.; and the east side of Victoria Park Lane from North Victoria Windrows Loop at Windrows Park to Dahlia Ct. Ground Cover area: 27,398 square feet Turf area: 37,350 square feet VW-11 The east side parkway on South Victoria Windrows Loop from Silktassel to Victoria Park Lane; the parkway on the south side of Victoria Park Lane from the intersection of South Victoria Windrows Loop and North Victoria Windrows Loop to Dahlia Ct.; the Victoria Park Lane median from the intersection of North and South Victoria Windrows Loop to Dahlia Ct.; and the parkway on the north side of Victoria Windrows Loop from the intersection of North and South Victoria Windrows Loop to Dahlia Ct. Ground Cover area: 23,082 square feet Turf area: 24,187 square feet VW-12 The Victoria Park Lane median from the intersection of North and South Victoria Windrows Loop west to the tract wall; the parkway on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from the intersection of North and South Victoria Windrows Loop, west to the tract wall; the parkway on the west side of north Victoria Windrows Loop from Silverberry to Victoria Park Lane and; the parkway on the south side of Silverberry from the wall to North Victoria Windrows Loop. Ground Cover area: 149,010 square feet Turf area: 38,842 square feet VW-13 The parkway on the south side of Victoria Park Lane from the west tract wall to South Victoria Windrows Loop; and the west side of South Victoria Windrows Loop from Victoria Park Lane to Snapdragon. Ground Cover area: 20,068 square feet Turf area: 16,476 square feet VW-14 The parkway on the west side of South Victoria Windrows Loop from Snapdragon to Victoria Park Lane; the parkway on the north and south side of Sugargum from South Victoria Windrows Loop to the wall; the parkways on the east and west sides of Basswood from Sugargum to Blazing Star; and the parkway on the north side of South Victoria Windrows Loop from Victoria Park Lane to Silktassel. Ground Cover. area: 21,466 square feet Turf area: 10,335 square feet VW-15 The parkway on the north side of Bougainvillea Way from Peach to North Victoria Windrows Loop; the parkway on the east side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Bougainvillea Way and following that curb line to Citrus. The parkway on the north side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Locust and following that curb line to Silverberry; the parkway on the north side of Silverberry from North Victoria Windrows Loop to the tract wall; the paseo from North Victoria Windrows Loop at Silverberry to Nasturtium; and the paseo from North Victoria Windrows Loop at Locust to Pistachio and continuing to Bougainvillea. Ground Cover area: 45,929 square feet Turf area: 12,207 square feet VW-16 The south side of Highland from 455 feet east Day Creek to 534 feet west of Locust. The east and west side of Locust from Highland to North Victoria Windrows Loop. The parkway on the south side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Citrus east to Bougainvillea Ct.; the parkway on the north side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Twinspur to Locust. Ground Cover area: 26,577 square feet Turf area: 23,922 square feet VW-17 This site was modified and added to VW-16, 1-5-99. 7 VW-18 The south side of Highland from 12583 Highland, the Polka Palace to Rockrose. Ground Cover area: 2,800 square feet Turf area: 8,515 square feet VW-19 The north side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Rosemary to Rockrose; the east side of Rockrose from North Victoria Windrows Loop to Highland; the south side of Highland from Rockrose to Etiwanda; and the horse trail from Highland and Etiwanda to the Fire Station. Ground Cover area: 21,027 square feet Turf area: 32,266 square feet VW-20 The parkway on the south side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Victoria Park Lane to Plum; the pasco from Tipu east to the open field; and the parkway on the west side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Plum Way to Rosemary Ct. Note: The area in front of Windrows Park is watered by VW-20 water meter, but is maintained by City crews. Ground Cover area: 2,110 square feet VW-21 The east side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Rosemary Ct., to the trail south of Kalmia St.; the trail and pasco from North Victoria Windrows Loop south of Kalmia St., to Etiwanda Ave., and north to the Fire Station; and the south side of Basil St., from North Victoria Windrows Loop to Santolina PI. Ground Cover area: 49,187 square feet Turf area: 57,532 square feet VW-22 The paseo from North Victoria Windrows Loop at Rockrose to the north east comer of Windrows Park and from that comer to Plum. Ground Cover area: 13,689 square feet Turf area: 19,953 square feet VW-23 The west side of Rockrose from Highland to North Victoria Windrows Loop; the parkway on the north side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Rockrose to Twinspur; and the parkway on the south side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Bougainvillea Ct., to Rosemary. Ground Cover area: 18,299 square feet Turf area: 3,425 square feet VW-24 The M.W.D. easement from Jasmine and Ironbark to Sweet Gum Dr. Ground Cover area: 475 square feet Turf area: 4,730 square feet VW-25 The north side of Baseline from from 384 feet west of Wanona to Etiwanda. The west side of Etiwanda from Baseline to Craig. Ground Cover area: 20,934 square feet Turf area: 3,079 square feet 8 VW-26 The Paseo from Grape to 630 feet west of Grape. Ground Cover area 7,021 square feet VW-27 The southside of Baseline from 251 feet west of Swanson to Etiwanda. Baseline median from Victoria Park Lane to Swanson Place. Ground Cover area 18,816 square feet This site had 2667feet of ground cover added from median 6-8-2005. 9 VG-1 The turf and ground cover on the south side of Highland from the Deer Creek Channel to Fairmont; the turf and ground cover from Highland on the west side of Fairmont to Victoria Park Lane; the ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park Lane south of the horse trail; from 475 feet east of Milliken to Fairmont; the turf on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from 275 feet east of Milliken to Fairmont; the turf in the parkway on the east side of Fairmont from Victoria Park Lane to Highland. Ground Cover area: 21,573 square feet Turf area: 47,604 square feet VG-2 The turf on the east side of York from Delaware to Fairmont; the ground cover on the south side of Fairmont from York Place and continuing on that curb line to Victoria Park Lane; the turf and ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park Lane, west of Milliken, from Fairmont to Milliken; the parkway on the west side of Milliken from Victoria Park Lane to Fairmont; the Milliken median from Fairmont to Victoria Park Lane; the turf on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from 273 feet west of Milliken to Milliken; the ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park Lane, south of the horse trail, from 468 feet west of Milliken to Milliken. Ground Cover area: 29,395 square feet Turf area: 73,608 square feet VG-3 The turf and ground cover, north of the sidewalk, on the north side of Fairmont from Nova Ct., and continuing on that curb line to York Pl.; and the turf south of the sidewalk on the north side of Fairmont from Armstrong Pl., and continuing on that curb line to York Pl.; the ground cover on the west side of York Pl., from Fairmont to Delaware and the ground cover on the east side of York Pl.; the turf and ground cover on the west side of Fairmont from Emerson continuing along that curb line to Armstrong Pl.; the turf and ground cover on the east and west sides of Biola Pl. Ground Cover area: 57,189 square feet Turf area: 38,343 square feet VG-4 The turf and ground cover on the south side of Fairmont from Armstrong to Milliken; the turf and ground cover on the west side of Milliken from Fairmont to the Southern Pacific Railroad; the Milliken median from Fairmont to the Southem Pacific Railroad; the ground cover on the north side of the Southern Pacific Railroad from Deer Creek Channel to Rochester, including the pasco to Baylor; the ground cover on the north side of Fairmont from Milliken to Nova Ct.; the turf on the north side of Fairmont from Milliken to Armstrong. Ground Cover area: 197,763 square feet Turf area: 24,151 square feet VG-5 The paseo from Biola at Amarillo to Delaware at York. Ground Cover area: 12,448 square feet Turf area: 44,896 square feet 10 VG-6 The paseo beginning at the northeast comer of Victoria Groves park and Fairmont and extending to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 73,442 square feet Turf area: 74,778 square feet VG-7 The paseo that begins on the south side of Donnelly at Fairmont and continues to the Deer Creek Channel including the southward extension on the west side of Albright from Dounelly to Pacific and the pasco from Pacific to Charleston. Ground Cover area: 43,427 square feet Turf area: 51,765 square feet VG-8 The ground cover on the west side of Milliken from 566 feet north of Victoria Park Lane to Victoria Park Lane; the ground cover and turf north of the horse trail on Victoria Park Lane from Milliken to Fairmont; the ground cover on the east side of Fairmont from Victoria Park Lane to 156 feet north of Victoria Park Lane. Ground Cover area: 21,614 square feet Turf area: 8,614 square feet VG-9 The ground cover on the east side of Fairmont from 156 feet north of Victoria Park Lane to Kenyon Way; the ground cover on the south side of Kenyon from Fairmont to 197 feet east of Fairmont; the turf on the south side of Kenyon from Fairmont to 316 feet east of Fairmont; the turf and ground cover on the south side of Baltimore Drive from Fairmont to Baltimore Court; the turf and ground cover on the north side of Baltimore Drive from Fairmont to Vanderbilt; the tuff and ground cover on the east side of Vanderbilt from Baltimore to Brown; the pasco from Vanderbilt and Brown to Kenyon. Ground Cover area: 48,481 square feet Turf area: 11,357 square feet VG-10 The ground cover on the south side of Kenyon from 197 feet east of Fairmont to Milliken; the turf on the south side of Kenyon from 316 feet east of Fairmont to Milliken; the ground cover on the west side of Milliken from Kenyon to 566 feet north of Victoria Park Lane; the turf and ground cover on the west side of Capitol from Brown to Bethany; the paseo from Capitol and Brown to Kenyon. Ground Cover area: 34,241 square feet Turf area: 11,031 square feet VG- 11 Milliken from Baseline to the abandoned railroad. The north side of Baseline from 542 feet east of Milliken to Milliken. Ground Cover area: 31,367 square feet Turf area: 17,264 square feet This site was reduced on 4-1-2002 by 25, 718 sq. fi. of turf and 3,037 sq. fi. of ground cover This site was added to on 10-2-2003. 11 VG-12 The turf and ground cover on the south side of Fairmont from the southeast comer of Milliken and Fairmont along that curb line to Victoria Park Lane; the turf and ground cover on the west side of Fairmont from the southwest comer of Victoria Park Lane and Fairmont (located east of Milliken) and continuing along that curb line to Milliken; the turf on the east side of Milliken from the Southern Pacific Railroad to 730 feet south of Victoria Park Lane; the. ground cover on the east side of Milliken from the Southern Pacific Railroad to 766 feet south of Victoria Park Lane. Ground Cover area: 53,068 square feet Turf area: 36,431 square feet VG-13 The paseo from Victoria Park Lane to Verona; from Verona to Napoli and Genova and to Tivoli. Ground Cover area: 17,993 square feet Turf area: 16,344 square feet VG-14 Base Line median from Milliken to Ellena East; the turf and ground cover on the north side of Base Line from Ellena East to Ellena West; the turf and ground cover on the east side of Ellena West from Base Line and following that curb line to Kenyon; the north side of Ellena West from Kenyon to Casoli; the turf and ground cover on both sides of Casoli from Ellena West to Candela; the turf and ground cover on both sides of Crema Place from Ellena west to Candela. {3round Cover area: 89,456 square feet Turf area: 62,999 square feet VG-15 The turf and ground cover on the west side of Rochester from the Railroad tracks to Base Line; the turf and ground cover on the north side of Base Line from Rochester to Ellena East; the Base Line Median from Rochester to Ellena East; the turf and ground cover on the east side of Ellena east from Base Line and continuing along that curb line to 275 feet north of Berra Road; the turf and ground cover on both sides of Berra from Ellena East to Comiso. Ground Cover area: 58,588 square feet Turf area: 57,306 square feet VG-16 The pasco from Base Line to Ellena West with entrances to Amelia and Payola. Ground Cover area: 9,661 square feet Turf area: 11,529 square feet VG-17 The paseo from Fairmont to the Southern Pacific Railroad; the paseo from Fabriano to Martano. Ground Cover area: 35,351 square feet Turf area: 40,291 square feet VG-18 The paseo from Rapallo to Gandino and south'to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 4,281 square feet 12 VG-19 The paseo from Tolentino to Pizolli and to Tolentino. Ground Cover area: 12,555 square feet Turf area: 17,856 square feet VG-20 The turf on the east side of Milliken from 730 feet south of Victoria Park Lane to Victoria Park Lane; the ground cover on the east side of Milliken from 766 feet south of Victoria Park Lane to Victoria Park Lane; the tuff and ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park Lane from the southeast comer at Milliken heading east to Fairmont; the turf and ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from Parma to the northeast comer of Milliken and Victoria Park Lane; the ground cover on the west side of Parma from Victoria Park Lane median from Milliken to Pandio Ct.; the Milliken median from Victoria Park Lane to 440 feet south of Kenyon; the parkway on the west side of Milliken from 420 feet south of Kenyon to Victoria Park Lane. Ground Cover area: 76,232 square feet Turf area: 97,979 square feet VG-21 The ground cover on the east side of Parma; the ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park Ln., from Parma to 653 feet east of Kenyon; the tuff on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from Parma to 653 feet east of Kenyon; the turf on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from Parma to 547 feet east of Kenyon; the turf and ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park Lane from Fairmont to 422 feet east of Kenyon; the turf and ground cover on the east and west sides of Kenyon from Victoria Park Lane to the Southern Pacific Railroad; the paseo from Kenyon to Rapallo; the paseo from Kenyon to Bad; the Victoria Park Lane median from Pandino Ct. to Portofino Ct. Ground Cover area: 69,167 square feet Turf area: 58,692 square feet VG-22 The ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from 653 feet east of Kenyon to Rochester; the turf on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from 547 feet east of Kenyon to Rochester; the Victoria Park Lane median from Portofino Ct., to Rochester Ave.; the turf and ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park Lane (north of sidewalk) from Kenyon to the east side of Vintage Park; the turf and ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park Lane from the east side of Vintage Park to Rochester; the turf and ground cover on the west side of Rochester from Victoria Park Lane to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 83,397 square feet Tuff area: 89,674 square feet 13 VG-23 The turf and ground cover on the east side of Kenyon from Victoria Park Lane to 409 feet west of Grimaldi; the ground cover on the south side of Portofino from Kenyon to Bergano; the turf and ground cover on the north and south side of Lark from Kenyon to the west side of Rancho Cucamonga High School; the ground cover on the east and west side of Matera from Lark to Pescara; the ground cover on the north and south side of Grimaldi, from Kenyon to Brindisi; the tuff and ground cover on the west side of Kenyon from Lark to Victoria Park Lane; the ground cover on the north and south side of Marcello from Kenyon to Landriano. The pasco from southwest comer of Kenyon Park to Kenyon. The pasco from south west comer of Kenyon Park to Kenyon. Ground Cover area: 63,733 square feet Turf area: 82,565 square feet VG-24 The north side of Kenyon from Autumn Glen court to Woodruff. The east side of Woodruff from Kenyon to 403 feet north of Kenyon. Ground Cover area: 8,447 square feet Turf area: 5,320 square feet VG-25 The paseo west of Torino from Kenyon to Highland; the turf and ground cover on the south side of Highland from the northwest comer of Tract 13440 to the east end of Tract 13440. Ground Cover area: 40,800 square feet Turf area: 24,134 square feet VG-26 The pasco from Brindisi Ct., to Messina; the turf and ground cover on the north side of Brindisi Ct., to the end of the cul-de-sac; the turf and ground cover on the west side of Messina from the paseo to Treviso Way. Ground Cover area: 18,905 square feet Turf area: 1,141 square feet VG-27 The Milliken median from 440 feet south of Kenyon to Highland; the parkway on the west side of Milliken from 420 feet south of Kenyon to Kenyon. Ground Cover area: 4,030 square feet Turf area: 3,006 square feet Reduced 1,670 square feet of G.C. on 7-1-00 VG-28 The east side of Rochester from Victoria Park Lane to Highland. Ground Cover area: 60,902 square feet VG-29 The westside of Milliken from Highland Kenyon. The Northside of Kenyon from Milliken to Fairmont. The groundcover on the eastside of Fairmont, east of sidewalk, from Kenyon to Highland. The southside of 210 freeway from Kenyon to Milliken from the asphalt to the wall. Ground Cover area: 69,788 square feet Turf area: 16,877 square feet Reduced 18,940 of turf on 7-1-00. 14 VG-30 The southside of Tresenda from Santo to Sapada. The paseo from Sapada to Carano. The southside of Montella from Carano to Trivento. Ground Cover area: 6,797 square feet Turf area: 2,462 square feet VG-31 The eastside of Brienza from Larino to Letini. The westside of Tindari from Letini to Larino. The Greenbelt on the southside of Marconi from Trivento to Comisco. The Eastside of Comisco from Scalea to Santo. Ground Cover area: 23,419 square feet Turf area: 18,351 square feet VG-32 The north side of Candela from Terini to Bettoloa. Ground Cover area: 20,172 square feet Tuff area: 8,190 square feet VG-33 The paseo from the Sapri to Railroad. Ground Cover area: 894 square feet VG-34 The paseo from Bronte to Railroad. Ground Cover area: 894 square feet VG-35 The east side of Rochester from 555 feet south of Palmi to Victoria Park Lane. The south side of Victoria Park Lane and median from Rochester to east side of Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 53,646 square feet Turf area: 11,150 square feet VG-36 The north side of Victoria Park Lane from the east side of Deer Creek Channel to Rochester. Ground Cover area: 55,780 square feet Tuff area: 10,500 square feet VG-37 The paseo at the end of Armadore. Ground Cover area: 1,350 square feet VG~38 The eastside of Milliken from 106' feet north of Victoria Park Lane to Kenyon. The north & south of Spring Mist Drive From Milliken to Summerstone. The south side of Kenyon from Milliken to Kenyon Park. Ground Cover area: 28,051 square feet Turf area: 4,533 square feet 15 VG-39 The north side of Victoria Park Lane from Kenyon paseo to 132' east of Milliken. The Kenyon Paseo outlet from Victoria Park Lane to Fairwinds Court. The Pasco from Victoria Park Lane to southwest comer of Kenyon Park. Ground Cover area: 55,089 square feet Turf area: 13,120 square feet VG-40 The south side of Highland from 413 feet west of Highland pasco to Highland paseo. The east side of Highland pasco from Highland to Kenyon. The north side of Kenyon from Highland paseo to Autumn Glen Court. Ground Cover area: 56,553 square feet VG-41 The Westside of Rochester from 294 feet south of Highland to Lark. The north side · of Lark From Rochester to 1230 feet west of Rochester. Ground Cover area: 31,413 square feet VG-42 The southside of Highland from 1314 feet west of Rochester to Rochester. The west side of Rochester from Highland to 294 feet south of Highland. Ground Cover area: 18,464 square feet VG-43 The north side of Victoria Park Lane and the median from Day Creek Blvd. to Day Creek Channel. The east and west side of Kensington Place from Victoria Park Lane to Stratford Drive. Ground Cover area: 70,669 square feet Turf area: 7,888 square feet VG-44 The west side of Day Creek Blvd. from 572 feet north of Silverberry to day Creek Blvd. The south side of Silverberry from Kensington to Day Creek Blvd. Ground Cover area: 36,835 square feet VG-45 The westside of Milliken and the Milliken median from the 210 freeway to Kenyon. Ground Cover area: 10,658 square feet Turf area: 610 square feet VG-46 The Baseline Median from 657 feet east of Virginia Drive to Rochester. The north side of Baseline fxom 278 feet east of Virginia to Rochester. The outlet at Huntley. The east side of Rochester from Baseline to 105 feet north of Shenandoah. Ground Cover area: 33,135 square feet VG-47 The north side of Baseline from 400 feet east of Day Creek Blvd. to Day Creek Blvd. Baseline median from Day Creek Blvd. to 595 feet east of Day Creek Blvd. Ground Cover area: 9,515 square feet. This site had an addition 6-8-2004 6,272 square feet of ground cover for median. 16 VG-48 The East side of Day Creek Blvd. And median from Baseline to Victoria Park Lane. The south side of Victoria Park Lane from Day Creek Blvd. to 390 feet east of Day Creek Blvd. Ground Cover area: 50,318 square feet Turf Area: 3,234 square feet VG-49 The north side of Victoria Park Lane and median from 390 feet east of Day Creek Blvd to Day Creek Blvd. The east side of Day Creek Blvd from Victoria Park Lane to Highland. The south side of Highland from Day Creek Blvd. to 440 feet east of Day Creek Blvd. Ground Cover area: 51,459 square feet Turf Area: 3,930 square feet VG-50 The West of San Carmela from 389 feet north of of Baseline to Baseline. The north side of Baseline from Carmela to 264 feet west of Durness. Ground Cover area: 18,043 square feet VG-51 Paseo south of Saxon to Railroad right away. Ground Cover area: 1,398 square feet VG-52 The north side of Sugar Gum from Milliken to Kensington. The south side of Sugar Gum from Milliken to 111 feet east of Suffolk. Ground Cover area: 4,362 square feet VG-53 The southside of Victoria Park Lane from 296 feet west of Kensington to Milliken. The west side of Day Creek Blvd. from Victoria Park Lane to 397 feet south of Sugar Gum. Ground Cover area: 28,532 square feet Turf Area: 11,070 square feet VG-54 The eastside of Rochester from Shenandoah to the railroad right-of-way. Ground Cover area: 6,684 square feet VG-55 Paseo north of Westhaven to the railroad. Ground Cover area: 1,775 square feet Ground cover, shrubs and turf areas that make up parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company, Parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews. 17 Section 2 - Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The budgeted costs for LMD #2 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover, shrubs and the neighborhood park. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing, are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #2 are as follows: Personnel Regular Payroll $598,170.00 Overtime Salaries $1,000.00 Pad-time Salaries $110,240.00 Fringe Benefits $303,020.00 Subtotal Personnel $1,012,430.00 Operations Maintenance and Operations Landscaping $67,150.00 Facilities $19,860.00 Vehicle Maintenance and Operations $10,000.00 Emergency & Routine Vehicle Equipment Rental $1,000.00 Equipment Maintenance $750.00 Utilities Water Utilities $365,000.00 Telephone Utilities $1,790.00 Electric Utilities $75,000.00 Contract Services Parkway & Median Landscape Maintenance $1,127,310.00 Park Landscape Maintenance $99,800.00 Tree Maintenance $66,680.00 CVWD Manditory Annual Backflow Cert. $3,500.00 Contract Services - Facilities $22,000.00 Subtotal Operations $1,859,840.00 Capital Expenditures Outlay/Building Improvements $0.00 Outlay/Equipment $8,000.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $8,000.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead $205,850.00 Total LMD #2 Expenditure Budget $3,086,120.00 Less Prior Year District Carryover $475,951.88 Assessment Revenue Required $2,610,168.12 Section 3 - Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishments of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one The Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDU's based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single-family home (SFR). The EDU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EDU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS Property Type EDU Value Multiplier Non-Residential Improved 2.00 Acres Vacant 0.25 Acres Multi-Family 1.00 Unit Single Family Residential 1.00 Unit It is recommended that the rate per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU.) remain at $422.00 for the FY 2005/2006. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: # of # of Rate per Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Type Unit Type Unit Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Family Parcel 5678 1.00 5678 $422.00 $2,396,116.00 Multi-Family Parcel 310 1.00 310 $422.00 $130,820.00 Comm/Ind Acre 56.37 2.00 112.74 $422.00 $47,576.28 Vacant Acre 337.97 0.25 84.4925 $422.00 $35,655.84 Total $2,610,168.12 C. Assessment All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2005/2006, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. 20 Section 4 - Annexations: Calendar Year 2004 Annexations Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 PROJECT UNITS ANNEX DATE TR 16370 82 SF 2/18/2004 TR 16612 186 MF 3/17/2004 TR 16374 25 SF 4/712004 TR 16301 53 SF 12/15/2004 TR 16445 17 SF 12/15/2004 2! Section 5 - Assessment Diagrams: 22 TRACT 16371 LOT 2 LOT A LOT I 15 LONG MEADOW TRACT 16373 VICTORIA ARBORS ~"'"'~ EDISON ~ CORRIDOR DEVEL-oPMENT AT '-~ VICTORiA ARBORS [D.R. VICTORIA ARBORS TRACT NO. 1.5948 TR.J,.CT NO. 1594'/ TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO, 15716 ~ STAIqDARD PACIFIC~ HOM~ ] ~ ~ ' ~-, TRACT INDEX ~H PLANNING AREAS TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 15716 ~' TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 16370 ~ VICTORIA ARBORS Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2005/2006 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A (Hyssop Maintenance District) ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A (Hyssop Maintenance District) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year 2004/2005, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 16th day of March, 2005. Approved by: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW ....................................................................................... 4 SECTION I - DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS .................................. 5 SECTION 2 - ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES ............................. 6 SECTION 3 - METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT .................. 7 A. GENERAL ..................................................................... 7 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ...................................... 7 C. ASSESSMENT .............................................................. 8 SECTION 4 - ANNEXATIONS ........... ~ ................................................... 9 SECTION 5 - ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS ............................................ 10 Overview The FY 2005/2006 Annual Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A (Hyssop Maintenance District ) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Light Act of 1972). Section 1 Description of Improvements The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Assessment District consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for FY 2005/2006, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discuses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for FY 2005/2006, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to the Landscape Maintenance District within Calendar year 2004. Section 5 Assessment Diagrams Shows the boundaries of the areas to be annexed to the Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A and the general boundaries of the District. For details regarding the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within the Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A, refer to the San Bernardino County Assessor's maps. 4 Section 1 - Description of Improvements: Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A (LMD #3A) represents a landscape parkway on Hyssop Drive south of Sixth Street. The site is associated with an area within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3A SITE LOCATIONS Site# Descriptive Location J-1 The west side of Hysop from 7th street to the south end of the cul- de-sac. Ground Cover area: 6,050 square feet. Section 2 - Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The budgeted costs for LMD #3A are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover, shrubs and the neighborhood park. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing, are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #3A are as follows: Operations Operations Maintenance and Operations $440.00 Utilities Water Utilities $630.00 Electric Utilities $220.00 Contract Services Landscape Maintenance $2,330.00 Subtotal Operations $3,620.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead $300.00 Total LMD #3a Expenditure Budget $3,920.00 Less Prior Year District Carryover $610.08 Assessment Revenue Required $3,309.92 Section 3 - Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishments of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one The Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDU's based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single-family home (SFR). The EDU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EDU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS Property Type EDU Value Multiplier Industrial 1.00 Unit 7 It is recommended that the rate per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU.) remain at $413.74 for the FY 200512006. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: # of # of Rate Per Physical Unit Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Type Units Units Units Unit Revenue Industrial Parcel 8 1.0 8 $413.74 $3,309.92 C. Assessment All assessed lots or pamels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2005/2006, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. Section 4 - Annexations: Calendar Year 2004 Annexations Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A No Annexations Section 5- Assessment Diagrams: LANDSCAPE MAI~rrENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENAI~CE DISTRICT NOS. i AND ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NORT[ COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA ])RCZO05-OO~O F_~(HInFF ASs ss 'l' LANDSCAPE MAINT!~N~J'~CE DIS~CT NO. 3B S~.LiG~G ~~CE DIST~ NOS. ! AND 6 { {' 8uilding A - 236,400 Building C - 19,220~SP Building D -- 19,220 Building F - 31~550 LEGEND N_O.NEW ITEMS &DD~D ~Q ~O[~K PBOGRAMS CITY OF RANCHO CUCA~ONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARBINO STATE OF CALIFORINIA DRCZO03-O08~6, EXHIBIT "A" ASs~ssM~ ~C~ LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIOHTINO MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. ! AIqD 6 t I LEGEND eSTRE'~.T k 16WT SAN ~RI~. ~. PARCEL MAP' 1~i18 -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~Or~T. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO / dC STATE OF CALIFORNIA [~ARCEL ]v~Ap 16[~~ : ASS~.SSNiENT DIAGRA~ · LANDScAPEMAINTI~ANCS DISTRICT NO. 3B S~ LIOHT~o ~EN~cE DIS~ NOS. ! AND 6 · I ;o{' FOOT~L B~'~-EVAF~:~eS) r-8 'C~ z--cURB L~N; ~' PUBLIC SIDEWALK EASEMENT LINE NE 1/4 ~EC lO. T1~ RXW ~B~ PER LEGEND CITY.OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NORTil ' STATE OF CALIFORNi,~ AS~E~SI~E~ DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE'MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B S~ET L~ ~~CE D[~ ~OS. ~ A~D ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Nowr~l COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~ VICINITY MAP ~r CITY HALL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO STREET LIGHTfi~IG MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. -/i,- ......... ,~ - .~/ '~ ~i~ ~-~ ~.,,~ ~ . ~ ....... ~~ ~ , ~. ! i~, CIVIC CENTER ~ -~-.~ cITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~oaxtl ~/ EXHIBIT "A ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM · LANDSCAPE MAU',FI'ENANC£ DISTRICT NO. 3B CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~O[tX~! COUN_TY~OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF C~LIFORN{~ ASSESSME1VT DIAGRAJVI · LANDSCAPE'MAII'qT .El'VANCE DI.qTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTING IvlArNTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 ~T~T ZI~tlTS 7 ~. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~o~t'r~ COUNTV ON' gAN I~I?.I~NA I'~n~r~n ]~ Y FOO~-HILL ARROW ROUTE 8TH STREET VICINITY MAP N ~IITY OF ITm,f: ' :ANCHO CUCAMONGA ~ ~"~NS£N z- i ?//,~ 1/~ K - ENOIN~,rrRrNG DIVISION EXt-rrRIT:'.F?~ ST ~DC K L ]- ~' ~. yicinitv Map ' N.T.S. DRC2002-00006 City of Rancho Cucamon,qa EJiHIImlT ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAIN 1 ~NANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B ' STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCF- DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 " PARCel. 5, G and T. ~ STRF-ETLI6H'T'. - .' : 5~'00 LU/~IEN HPsV 3~~TREE.T TRE. E$ ADDED TO .L/V~b N~O. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTEN)kNC£ DISTRICT NO. 3B.^~4D I ' STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 , 6TH ST. Y PROJECT , " LOC^lION 4TH ST. CITY OF RANCHO CUCANIONGA NORT COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO LOCA~bN MAP FOOTHILL ~ Subject Site- Propoeed Shopping ./',; Cily E)oundar¥ I EXmmT"A"'- ~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTR~CT NOS. i AND 6 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO EXHIBIT 'A" ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. ! AND 6 ,0£° COURT ~...~ ST~F..ETL~6HT 16.,000 LUP~F_N H, pSV CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~orcrn COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ~TATF_ OF CALIFORNIA EXHIBIT 'A'" ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINyENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6. ~ -~ :- ., CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~on'ru COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO EXHIBIT ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NORTil COUNTY OF SAN BERNAR'DINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~T m ~ ii/iLLLrR .¢/~£Er PROJEC'1 SITE BOULEVARD FOOTHILL VICINITY MAP c~Ty OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ITEM: TITLE: ~ ENGINEERING DIVISION ~ EXHIBIT: - ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 S~X'~ S7~ ~-~-.~-~ ~. . .'. .' ' . . . ..~.~. · ...~ · . !~..~.. ,., .,: =~!~??ii,~!!=. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~o~ COUNTY OF SA~ BER~ARDI~O EXHIBIT ', ASSESSMENT DIAGRAIVI ~'~ LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTINO MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 ARROW ROUTE ' ~o' -30.99' 3G5.34' o '- ~{b ~ _ N~9=24'I3"E ~30,20' LEGEND ~ __ WIll. RAM AVENUE ~ ._ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NORTH COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO /,~) EXHIBIT "A' ASSESSMEiNT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTING MAIIqTElqANCE DISTRICT NOS. G ~" STREET .~.oo._.,,...~, -1 ! ,____l~ll ,' : ,o~; I ii ' ' CITY OF RAINCItO CUCAMONG COUNTY OF STATI~ OF CALIFORNIA /~. 16010 EXHIBIT "A" - 2~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DIST~b,/CT NO. 4 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 4 A CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~olrrH Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2005~2006 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (Tot Lot) ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (Tot Lot) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year 2005/2006, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 16th day of March, 2005. Approved by: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW ....................................................................................... 4 SECTION 1 - DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS .................................. SECTION 2 - ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES ............................. 6 SECTION 3 - METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT .................. 7 A. GENERAL. ..................................................................... 7 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ....................................... 7 C. ASSESSMENT ............................................................... 8 SECTION 4 - ANNEXATIONS ............................................................... 9 SECTION 5 - ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS ............................................. 10 Overview The FY 2005/2006 Annual Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (Tot Lot) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Light Act of 1972). Section 1 Description of Improvements The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Assessment District consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for FY 2005/2006, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discuses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon apl assessable lands within the District for FY 2005/2006, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to the Landscape Maintenance District within Calendar year 2004. Section 5 Assessment Diagrams Shows the boundaries of the areas to be annexed to the Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 and the general boundaries of the District. For details regarding the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within the Landscape Maintenance District No. 5, refer to the San Bernardino County Assessor's maps. Section 1 - Description of Improvements: Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (LMD #5) represents a landscaped tot lot, located on the southwest corner of Andover Place and Bedford Drive. This site is associated with a group of 44 single family parcels which all have a common usage of the tot lot such that any benefit derived from the landscaping can be directly attributed to those particular parcels. Because of this, assessment required for this district is charged to those specific parcels. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 SITE LOCATIONS Site # Descriptive Location I-1-5 The tot lot on the southwest corner of Andover and Bedford. Ground Cover area: 1,506 square feet Turf area: 1,070 square feet LMD-5 TOTAL GROUND COVER: 1,506 square feet LMD-5 TOTAL TURF: 1,070 square feet Section 2 - Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The budgeted costs for LMD #5 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover, shrubs and the neighborhood park. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing, are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #5 are as follows: Operations Maintenance and Operations Landscaping $300.00 Facilities $500.00 Vehicle Maintenance and Operations $70.00 Utilities Water Utilities $540.00 Electric Utilities $280.00 Contract Services Facilities $1,000.00 Landscape Maintenance $1,890.00 Subtotal Operations $4,580.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead $600.00 Total LMD #5 Expenditure Budget $5,180.00 Less Prior Year District Carryover $195.24 Assessment Revenue Required $4,984.76 Section 3 - Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishments of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one The Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDU's based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single-family home (SFR). The EDU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EDU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS Property Type EDU Value Multiplier Single Family 1.00 Parcel It is recommended that the rate per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU.) remain at $113.29 for the FY 2005/2006. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: # of Rate per Physical Unit # of Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Type Units Unit Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Family Parcel 44 1 44 $113,29 $4,984.76 C. Assessment All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2005/2006, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. Section 4 - Annexations: Calendar Year 2004 Annexations Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 No Annexations Section 5 - Assessment Diagrams: Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2005/2006 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 (Caryn Planned Community) ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 (Caryn Planned Community) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year 2005~2006, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 16th day of March, 2005. Approved by: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW ....................................................................................... 4 SECTION 1 - DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS .................................. 5 SECTION 2 - ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES ............................ 9 SECTION 3 - METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT ................ 10 A. GENERAL ................................................................... 10 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY .................................... 10 C. ASSESSMENT ............................................................. 11 SECTION 4 - ANNEXATIONS ............................................................. 12 SECTION 5 - ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS ............................................. Overview The FY 2005/2006 Annual Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 (Caryn Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Light Act of 1972). Section 1 Description of Improvements The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Assessment District consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for FY 2005/2006, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discuses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for FY 2005/2006, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to the Landscape Maintenance District within Calendar year 2004. Section 5 Assessment Diagrams Shows the boundaries of the areas to be annexed to the Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 and the general boundaries of the District. For details regarding the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within the Landscape Maintenance District No. 6, refer to the San Bernardino County Assessor's maps. Section 1 - Description of Improvements: Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 (LMD #6) represents landscape sites throughout the Caryn Planned Community. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The various sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, paseos, street trees, and community trails.. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: SCHEDULE III-A LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 SITE LOCATIONS Site # Descriptive Locations CC-1 The Southside of Banyan from 1290 feet west of Milliken to Milliken. The Westside of Milliken & Median from Banyan to 292 south of Vintage. Ground Cover area: 96,892 square feet Turf area: 17,945 square feet This site was reduced March 13, 2003 because of freeway right-a-way 15,176 Ground Cover and 4,077 square feet Turf. CC-2 This site was deleted 7-1-00 and was combined with CC-1. Both sites had 7784 square feet of ground cover deleted and 4077 of turf deleted. CC-3 The paseo on the west side of Morning from Morning Place to Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 2,801 square feet Turf area: 124 square feet CC-4 The west side of Morning Pl., from Banyan to Starview Pl.; the north side of Star View Pl., from Morning Pl., to Star View CT. Ground Cover area: 14,273 square feet Turf area: 5,513 square feet 5 CC-5 Silver Sun paseo from the end of Silver Sun cul-de-sac to Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 25,890 square feet Turf area: 12,084 square feet CC-6 The east and west side of Netherlands View Loop from Vintage to Vintage. The Netherlands View Loop paseo from Netherlands View Loop to Mt Sterling CT. Ground Cover area: 88,902 square feet Turf area: 676 square feet CC-7 The east and west side of Hillview Loop from Mt. Rainer CT. to Kettle Peak. Ground Cover area: 14,930 square feet Turf area: 6,318 square feet CC-8 The paseo from Hillview Loop to Vintage Drive. Ground Cover area: 42,107 square feet Turf area: 22,752 square feet CC-9 The south side of Vintage from 250 feet west of Hillview Loop to Hillview Loop. The west side of Hillview Loop from Vintage to Kettle Peak. The west side of Kettle Peak from Hillview Loop to Donner Pass CT. The east side of Hillview Loop from Kettle Peak to Tioga Peak. Ground Cover area: 47,334 square feet Turf area: 4,954 square feet CC-10 The east side of Terrace View Loop from Vintage to Butler Peak. The west side of Terrace View Loop from Rainbow Falls CT. to Vintage. Ground Cover area: 24,603 square feet CC-11 The paseo from Caryn School to Banyan. The south side of Banyan from the paseo to Rochester. The east and west side of Mt. Baldy CT. from Banyan to Sierra Crest View Loop. The north side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Hilltop CT. to Woodland CT. Ground Cover area: 47,507 square feet Turf area: 7,810 square feet CC-12 The separation paseo from Vintage to Pinnacle Peak. Ground Cover area: 50,325 square feet Turf area: 15,021 square feet CC-13 The east side of Hillview Loop from Tioga Peak CT. to Vintage. The south side of Vintage From Hillview Loop to Terrace View Loop. The north side of Vintage from Hillview Loop to Caryn School. The east side of Terrace View Loop from Vintage to Mt. San Antonio CT. Ground Cover area: 26,162 square feet Turf area: 4,508 square feet CC-14 The east side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Mt. Waverly to Vintage. The north side of Vintage from Sierra Crest View Loop to Sierra Crest View Loop. The east and west side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Vintage to Mt. Wilson CT. The south side of vintage from Netherlands View Loop to 330 feet west of Netherlands View Loop. Ground Cover area: 73,250 square feet Turf area: 16,525 square feet CC-15 The south side of Sierra Crest View Loop From Mt. Waverly CT. to Mt. Cambridge CT. The north side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Mt. Cambridge CT. to Woodland CT. The north side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Hilltop CT. to Caryn School. The Sierra Crest View Loop paseo from Sierra Crest View Loop to Mt. Sherman CT. Ground Cover area: 70,990 square feet Turf area: 7,699 square feet CC-16 The south side of Vintage from Netherlands View Loop to Rochester. The north side of Vintage from Rochester to Sierra Crest View Loop. The east and west side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Mt. Wilson CT. to Mt. Cambridge CT. The Netherlands View Loop paseo from Vintage to Mt. Sterling CT. Ground Cover area: 77,202 square feet Turf area: 3,954 square feet CC-17 The east side of Milliken from Vintage to Banyan Ground Cover area: 13,740 square feet Turf area: 9,088 square feet CC-18 The north side of Vintage from Milliken to Hillview Loop. The south side of Vintage from 104 feet west of Hillview to Milliken. Ground Cover area: 32,287 square feet Turf area: 3,889 square feet July 1, 2002 a reduction of 622 sq. feet of G. C. and 4710 sq. feet of turf because a new street was installed south o Vintage. CC-19 The Terrace View Loop paseo from Vintage to Terrace View Loop. Ground Cover area: 17,496 square feet Turf area: 15,617 square feet CC-20 The east side of Terrace View Loop from Mt. San Antonio CT. to El Capitan CT. The west side of Terrace View Loop from Butler Peak Pl. to Mt San Antonio CT. Ground Cover area: 20,627 square feet Turf area: 20,017 square feet 7 CC-21 The west side of Rochester from Banyan to 317 feet south of Vintage Ground Cover area: 31,292 square feet This site was re-landscaped due to freeway being installed and 18,692 sq feet was reduced from this site and is now part of CC-26. CC-22 The south side of Vintage from Terrace View Loop to Sierra Crest View Loop. The east and west side of Hillview loop from Vintage to Mt. Rainer CT. Ground Cover area: 11,609 square feet Turf area: 3,763 square feet CC-23 The south side of Banyan from Milliken to Butler Peak Pl. The west side of Butler Peak Pl. from Banyan to Terrace View Loop. The north side of Terrace View Loop from Butler Peak Pl. to Rainbow Falls CT. Ground Cover area: 12,132 square feet CC-24 The north side of Terrace View Loop From El Capitan CT. to Butler Peak Pl. The east side of Butler Peak Pl. from Terrace View Loop to Banyan. The south side of Banyan from Butler Peak Pl. to 990 feet east of Butler Peak Pl. Ground Cover area: 14,452 square feet CC-25 This site was moved to CC-13. This mainline was part of CC-13 and should not of been its own site. CC-26 The east side of Rochester from 210 freeway to Vintage. The north and south side of Vintage from to Rochester to Thunder Mountain. The westside of Rochester from 317 feet south of Vintage to the 210 Freeway. Ground Cover area: 35,037 square feet Due to freeway being built this area was relandscaped January 7, 2005 and 16825 square feet was added to this side. CC-27 The Milliken median and the westside of Milliken from 292 feet south of Vintage to 210 Freeway. Ground Cover area: 13,365 CC-28 The east side of Milliken from Vintage to the 210 freeway right of way. Ground Cover area: 17,724 square feet CC-29 The Milliken median from Banyan to 1420 feet north of Vintage. Ground Cover area: 4,240 square feet Section 2 - Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The budgeted costs for LMD #6 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover, shrubs and the neighborhood park. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing, are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #6 are as follows: Personnel Regular Payroll $19,620.00 Part-Time $6,140.00 Fringe Benefits $10,160.00 Subtotal Personnel $35,920.00 Operations Maintenance and Operations Landscaping $13,550.00 Vehicle Maintenance and Operations $1,000.00 Emergency & Routine Vehicle Equipment Rental $100.00 Utilities Water Utilities $81,800.00 Electric Utilities $5,460.00 Contract Services Parkway & Median Landscape Maintenance $285,830.00 Tree Maintenance $27,770.00 Subtotal Operations $415,510.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead $33,590.00 Total LMD #6 Expenditure Budget $485,020.00 Less Prior Year District Carryover $170,380.22 Assessment Revenue Required $314,639.78 Section 3 - Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishments of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one The Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDU's based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single-family home (SFR). The EDU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EDU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS Property Type EDU Value Multiplier Single Family 1.00 Parcel ]0 It is recommended that the rate per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU.) remain at $246.97 for the FY 2005/2006. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: # of # of Rate per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Units Unit Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Family Parcel 1274 1.0 1274 $246.97 $314,639.78 C. Assessment All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2005/2006, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. 1! Section 4 - Annexations: Calendar Year 2004 Annexations Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 No Annexations Section 5 - Assessment Diagrams: Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2005/2006 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year 2005/2006, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 16th day of March, 2005. Approved by: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW ....................................................................................... 4 SECTION I - DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS .................................. 5 SECTION 2 - ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES ............................ 9 SECTION 3 - METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT ................ 10 A. GENERAL ................................................................... 10 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY .................................... 10 C. ASSESSMENT ............................................................. 11 SECTION 4 - ANNEXATIONS ............................................................. SECTION 5 - ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS ............................................. 13 III Overview The FY 2005~2006 Annual Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) is prepared in complianCe with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Light Act of 1972). Section 1 Description of Improvements The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Assessment District consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for FY 2005/2006, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discuses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for FY 2005/2006, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to the Landscape Maintenance District within Calendar year 2004. Section 5 Assessment Diagrams Shows the boundaries of the areas to be annexed to the Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 and the general boundaries of the District. For details regarding the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within the Landscape Maintenance District No. 7, refer to the San Bernardino County Assessor's maps. Section 1 - Description of Improvements: Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (LMD #7) represents landscape sites throughout the Etiwanda North Area. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The various sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, paseos, street trees, community trails and Etiwanda Creek Park. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: SCHEDULE III LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 SITE LOCATIONS Site # Descriptive Location EN-1 The Northside of Wilson from San Sevaine to Ridgeline: The Eastside of Ridgeline from Wilson to Arcadia, The southside of Arcadia from Ridgeline to 77 feet east of Ridgeline. Ground Cover area: 27,325 square feet Turf area: 19,334 square feet EN-2 The Metropolitan Water District easement on the southside of Crescenta Way from San Marino to Ridgeline. Ground Cover area: 38,104 square feet Turf area: 41,250 square feet EN-3 The Wilson Median from Wardman Bullock to San Sevaine. Ground Cover area: 15,706 square feet EN-4 The Planters on the northside of the drainage easement that is between and parallel to Highland and Arapaho east of Etiwanda Ave. Ground Cover area: 63,972 square feet EN-5 The southside of Wilson from 1,115 feet west of San Sevaine to 205 feet east of San Sevaine. The Landscape east of San Sevaine from 24th to south end tract. Ground Cover area: 45,584 square feet Turf area: 3,527 square feet EN-6 The northside of Wilson from Wardman Bullock to Ridgeline. The westside of Ridgeline from Wilson to 120 feet north of Amadia. Ground Cover area: 29,226 square feet Turf area: 15,136 square feet EN-7 The parkway on the eastside of Wardman Bullock from 24th street to 857 feet north of Glendora. The cobblestone between the tract wall and the flood wall will be handled as as extra for debris pickup and weed control on an as needed basis. Ground Cover area: 10,268 square feet EN-8 The southside of Crescenta Way from Ridgeline to Crestline. Ground Cover area: 50,305 square feet Turf area: 35,960 square feet EN-9 The paseo from Meadow Brook to Rock Creek Road. Ground Cover. area: 1,400 square feet Turf area: 6,555 square feet EN-10 The pasco from Etiwanda to North Rim Way. The westside of Etiwanda from 175 feet north of North Rim Way to 171 feet south of Golden Prarie Drive. Ground Cover area: 49,020 square feet Turf area: 4,445 square feet EN-11 The pasco south of Ridge Crest Drive to southern boundary of Tract 14139. This site is temporarily maintained by another contractor and was deleted from the contract as of 7-16-01, however, this site is still the city's property. Old Ground Cover area:3,548 square feet Old Turf area: 800 square feet EN-12 The cul-de-sac on the northside of Ridgecrest at Etiwanda Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 1,870 square feet Turf area: 700 square feet EN-13 The east side of San Sevaine from Wilson to 136 feet north of Creseenta. Ground Cover area: 46,611 square feet Turf area: 5,037 square feet EN-14 The west side of San Sevaine from 150' north of Wilson to 136' north of Crescenta. Ground Cover area: 55,166 square feet Turf area: 235 square feet 6 EN-15 The north side of Youngs Canyon Road from 500 feet east of Koch to 692 feet west of Koch. The south side of Youngs Canyon Road from 349 feet east of Koch to 692 feet west of Koch. The east and west side of Koch place from Youngs Canyon Road to 132 feet north of Youngs Canyon Road. The west side of Koch from Youngs Canyon Road to 132 feet south of Youngs Canyon Road. The east side of Koch from 82 feet south of Youngs Canyon Road to Youngs Canyon Road. The trailhead north east of the east end of Youngs Canyon Road to the south end of San Sevaine Horse Trail. The south end of San Sevaine Horse from the trail head to 254 feet north oftrailhead. Ground Cover area: 42,925 square feet EN-16 The east side of Wardman Bullock from 225 feet south of San Segundo Drive to 80 feet north of Dona Way. Ground Cover area: 2,056 square feet EN-17 The north side of Colonbero from San Sevaine Channel to Guidera Drive. The south side of Colonbero from San Sevaine Channel to 400 feet north of Guidera Drive. The north side of Aggazzotti from Colonbero to 475 feet east of Colonbero. This site has a pump which will be adjusted and maintained by city personnel. Ground Cover area: 43,241 square feet EN-18 The north side of Aggazzotti Road from San Antonio Drive to San Sevaine Road. The west side of San Sevaine road from Aggazzotti to 702 feet south of Aggazzotti. The East side of San Sevaine Road from 702 feet south of Aggazzotti to Regina. Ground Cover area: 47,823 square feet EN-19 The south side of Wilson from Etiwanda to Estates Way. Ground Cover area: 45,727 square feet EN-20 The southside or Wilson from Estates Way to Hanley. Ground Cover area: 14,207 square feet EN-21 Thc north side of Wilson from Etiwanda to Cervantes. The Wilson meidan from Etiwanda To Cervantes. The Westside of Etiwanda From Wilson To Del Norte Place. Ground Cover area: 88,795 square feet EN-22 The north and south side of Vintage from 165 feet east of Country View to 338 feet west of Country View. Ground Cover area: 13,603 square feet EN-23 The north side of Wilson and median from Etiwanda west to Etiwanda. The eastside of Etiwanda from Wilson to 1150 feet north of Wilson. Ground Cover area: 32,027 square feet 7 EN-24 The north side of Vintage from 360 feet west of Ascot to 230 feet east of Countrywood. Ground Cover area: 34,707 square feet EN-25 The eastside of Bluegrass from Banyan to 610 feet north of Banyan. Ground Cover area: 4,054 square feet EN-26 The southside of Banyan from Bluegrass to Greenwood. Ground Cover area: 6,240 square feet EN-27 The southside of Banyan from Laurel Blossom to Etiwanda. Ground Cover area: 1,703 square feet EN-28 The north side of Wilson from Cervantes to 1715 feet west of Cervantes. The westside of Cervantes from Carmel Knolls Drive to Wilson. The paseo from Wilson to Tejas Ct. The median on Wilson from Cervantes to Bluegrass. The following temporary landscape: There is 1 planter on the westside of Altura at Tejas. Them am five planters on the southside of Tejas from Altura to 195 feet east of Altura. Ground Cover area: 25,048 square feet Section 2 - Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The budgeted costs for LMD #7 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover, shrubs and the neighborhood park. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing, are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #7 are as follows: Personnel Regular Payroll 140,690.00 Part-time Salaries 24,740.00 Fringe Benefits 71,170.00 Subtotal Personnel $236,600.00 Operations Maintenance and Operations Landscaping $28,190.00 Trees $3,000.00 Parks $13,100.00 Facilities $6,000.00 Vehicle Maintenance and Operations $2,500.00 Emergency & Routine Vehicle Equipment Rental $500.00 Equipment Maintenance $500.00 Utilities Water Utilities $95,000.00 Telephone Utilities $3,150.00 Electric Utilities $17,960.00 Contract Services Parkway & Median Landscape Maintenance $260,730.00 CVWD Manditory Annual Backflow Cert. $3,500.00 Tree Maintenance $14,680.00 Parks $40,130.00 Facilities $9,000.00 Subtotal Operations $497,940.00 Capital Outlay Vehicles $16,000.00 Subtotal - Capital Outlay $16,000.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead $45,800.00 Total LMD #7 Expenditure Budget $796,340.00 Less Prior Year District Carryover $287~558.15 Assessment Revenue Required $508,781.85 Section 3 - Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishments of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value: "The net amount to be aSSessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one The Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDU's based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single-family home (SFR). The EDU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EDU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS Property Type EDU Value Multiplier Single Family 1.00 Parcel Comm/Ind 2.00 Acre ]0 It is recommended that the rate per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU.) remain at $307.05 for the FY 2005/2006. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: # of # of Rate per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Family Parcel 1647 1.00 1647 $307.05 $505,711.35 Comm/Ind Acre 5 2.00 10 $307.05 $3,070.50 Total $508,781.85 C. Assessment All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2005/2006, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. l! Section 4 - Annexations: Calendar Year 2004 Annexations Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 PROJECT UNITS ANNEX DATE TR 16113 23 SF 7/21/2004 PM 16180 4 SF 9/15/2004 Section 5 - Assessment Diagrams: EXHIBIT ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 STREET LIGHT!NG MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 7 4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCA~ON~A ~O~T,~ Z/ COUNTY OF SAN BE~ARDINO EXHIBIT "A"-,~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 STREET LIGHTI'NG MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 7 b/IL SL~N A ~- I! CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2005/2006 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year 2005~2006, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 16th day of March, 2005. Approved by: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW ....................................................................................... 4 SECTION 1 - DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS .................................. 5 SECTION 2 - ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES ............................. 6 SECTION 3 - METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT .................. 7 A. GENERAL ..................................................................... 7 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ......................................7 C. ASSESSMENT .............................................................. 8 SECTION 4 - ANNEXATIONS .............................................................. 9 SECTION 5 - ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS ............................................. 10 Overview The FY 2005/2006 Annual Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Light Act of 1972). Section 1 Description of Improvements The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Assessment District consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for FY 2005/2006, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discuses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the pamels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for FY 2005/2006, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bemardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to the Landscape Maintenance District within Calendar year 2004. Section 5 Assessment Diagrams Shows the boundaries of the areas to be annexed to the Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 and the general boundaries of the District. For details regarding the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within the Landscape Maintenance District No. 8, refer to the San Bernardino County Assessor's maps. Section 1 - Description of Improvements: Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 (LMD #8) represents landscape sites throughout the Etiwanda South Area. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The various sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, paseos, street trees and community trails. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 SITE LOCATIONS Site # Descriptive Location SE-1 The eastside of East Ave. from 480 feet south of Catalpa to 182 feet north of Catalpa. The north and south side of Catalpa from; East Ave. to Brownstone. Ground Cover area: 10,355 square feet Turf area: 6,258 square feet SE-2 The south side of Highland from 361 feet east of East Avenue, to 210 feet East of Starstone. Ground Cover area: 16,686 square feet SE-3 The south side of Fischer from 860 feet West of Mulberry to Mulberry. Ground Cover area: 6,630 square feet LMD-8 TOTAL GROUND COVER: 33,671 square feet LMD-8 TOTAL TURF: 6,258 square feet Section 2 - Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The budgeted costs for LMD #8 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover, shrubs and the neighborhood park. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing, are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #8 are as follows: Operations Maintenance and Operations Landscaping $2,080.00 Vehicle Maintenance and Operations $800.00 Utilities Water Utilities $3,230.00 Telephone Utilities $530.00 Electric Utilities $740.00 Contract Services Parkway & Median Landscape Maintenance $27,640.00 Tree Maintenance $21,000.00 Subtotal Operations $56,020.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead $2,940.00 Total LMD #8 Expenditure Budget $58,960.00 Prior Year District Carryover $30,638.85 Assessment Revenue Required $28,321.15 Section 3 - Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishments of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment distdct may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one The Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDU's based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single-family home (SFR). The EDU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EDU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS Property Type EDU Value Multiplier Single Family 1.00 Parcel 7 It is recommended that the rate per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU.) remain at $151.45 for the FY 2005/2006. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: # of # of Rate per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Units Unit Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Family Parcel 187 1.0 187 $151.45 $28,321.15 C. Assessment All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2005/2006, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. Section 4 - Annexations: Calendar Year 2004 Annexations Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 PROJECT UNITS ANNEX DATE TR 16542 11 SF 5/19~2004 Section 5 - Assessment Diagrams: l0 EXHIBIT "A"- ~Z ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 8 ST~-E~T LI~-HT~ 5- ~. ST/Z~-"F Tfz~E~ .~11- EA. CITY OF RANCHO CUCANIONGA ~ORTI[ COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2005/2006 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 (Lower Etiwanda) ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 (Lower Etiwanda) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year 2005/2006, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 16th day of March, 2005. Approved by: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW ....................................................................................... 4 SECTION I - DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS .................................. 5 SECTION 2 - ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES ............................. 8 SECTION 3 - METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT .................. 9 A. GENERAL ..................................................................... 9 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ....................................... 9 C. ASSESSMENT .............................................................. 10 SECTION 4 - ANNEXATIONS ............................................................. 11 SECTION 5 - ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS ............................................. 12 3 Overview The FY 2005/2006 Annual Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 (Lower Etiwanda) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Light Act of 1972). Section 1 Description of Improvements The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Assessment District consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for FY 2005/2006, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discuses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for FY 2005/2006, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to the Landscape Maintenance District within Calendar year 2004. Section 5 Assessment Diagrams Shows the boundaries of the areas to be annexed to the Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 and the general boundaries of the District. For details regarding the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within the Landscape Maintenance District No. 9, refer to the San Bernardino County Assessor's maps. 4 Section 1 - Description of Improvements: Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 (LMD #9) represents landscape sites throughout the Lower Etiwanda Area. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The various sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands and street trees. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: SCHEDULE IV LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 SITE LOCATIONS Site # Descriptive Location 9-1 Thc west side of East Ave. from 380 fcct north of Chateau to 290 feet south of Chateau. Ground Cover area: 4,426 square feet Hardscape area: 7,360 square feet 9-2 The west side of East Ave. from 339 feet north of Brookfield to 157 feet north ofBrookfield. Brookfield from East Ave. to Oak Crest. The east side of Oak Crest to 137 feet north of Brookfield. Ground Cover area: 2,390 square feet Hardscape area: 6,874 square feet 9-3 The west side of East Ave. from 790 feet north of Highfield to 256 feet south of Highfield. Ground Cover area: 8,769 square feet Hardscape area: 10,669 square feet 5 9-4 The west side of East Ave. From 295 feet north of Via Veneto To Via Veneto. The north side of Via Veneto From East Ave to Dolcetto. The east side of Dolcetto from Via Veneto to Miller Ave. The south side of Miller Ave from 372 feet west of Dolcetto to 240 feet east of Dolcetto. The west side of Dolcetto from Miller to Garcia. The north side of Garcia from Dolcetto to Etiwanda Ave. Ground Cover area: 48,612 square feet Hardscape ama: 28,746 square feet 9-5 The north side of Miller from 429 feet west of Dolcetto to 1029 feet west of Dolcetto Ground Cover area: 6,519 square feet Hardscape area: 3,325 square feet 9-6 The north side of Miller From 254 feet east of Dolcetto to 167 feet west of Dolcetto. Ground Cover area: 4,089 square feet Hardscape area: 2,854 square feet 6 Section 2 - Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The budgeted costs for LMD #9 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover, shrubs and the neighborhood park. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing, are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #9 are as follows: Personnel Regular Salaries $4,180.00 Part-tim e Salaries $7,190.00 Fringe Benefits $2,700.00 Subtotal Personnel $14,070.00 Operations Maintenance and Operations Landscaping $7,650.00 Facilities $2,170.00 Emergency & Routine Vehicle Equipment Rental $200.00 Utilities Water Utilities $8,000.00 Electric Utilities $1,300.00 Contract Services Parkway & Median Landscape Maintenance $31,210.00 Tree Maintenance $2,210.00 Facilities $4,000.00 Subtotal Operations $56,740.00 Capital Expenditures Outlay/Vehicles $16,000.00 Outlay/Computer $0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $16,000.00 Reserve for Capital Maintenance and Improvements $0.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead $43,410.00 Total LMD #9 Expenditure Budget $130,220.00 Prior Year Deficit Recovery $525,367.04 Assessment Revenue Required $655,587.04 Section 3 - Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishments of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one The Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDU's based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single-family home (SFR). The EDU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EDU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS Property Type EDU Value Multiplier Single Family 1.00 Parcel Multi-Family 1.00 Unit It is recommended that the rate per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU.) remain at $375.91 for the FY 2005/2006. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: # of # of Rate per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Units Unit Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Family Parcel 785 1.0 785 $375.91 $295,089.35 Multi-Family Unit 958 1 958 $375.91 $360,121.78 Comm/Ind Parcel 1 1 1 $375.91 $375.91 Total $655,587.04 C. Assessment All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2005/2006, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. ]0 Section 4 - Annexations: Calendar Year 2004 Annexations Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 PROJECT UNITS ANNEX DATE TR 16454-1 81 SF 2/4/2004 TR 16455 156 MF 2/18/2004 TR 16279-1 74 SF 3/3/2004 DRC 2002-00519 1 Comm/Ind 3/17/2004 TR 16454 36 SF 8/4/2004 Section 5 - Assessment Diagrams: EXHIBIT "A - 5 # ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ~ STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 8 · COUNTY ~' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~or~'r~ OF SAN BERNARDINO ~[ EXN1BIT "A ~ ~ ASSESSMENT DiAGRAM ' LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DiSTRiCT NO. ~O .' ~. STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTR/CT NOS. I AND 8 ~ MILLER PROJECT FOOTHILL ~OILJLiE1/ARD CITY OF ~NCHO CUCAMONGA ~ COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO NORTH ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND STREET LI(rHT-C ?4- EXHIBIT 'A - ;~' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ~ STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 8 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NORTH COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~ '/(~4'~4'--[ 0f) Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2005/2006 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 (Rancho Etiwanda) ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 (Rancho Etiwanda) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year 2005/2006, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 16th day of March, 2005. Approved by: William J. O'Neii, City Engineer 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW ....................................................................................... 4 SECTION 1 - DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS ................................. 5 SECTION 2 - ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES ............................ 6 SECTION 3 - METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT ................. 7 A. GENERAL .................................................................... 7 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ..................................... 7 C. ASSESSMENT ............................................................. 8 SECTION 4 - ANNEXATIONS ............................................................. 9 SECTION $ - ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS ............................................ Overview The FY 2005/2006 Annual Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 (Rancho Etiwanda) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Light Act of 1972). Section 1 Description of Improvements The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Assessment District consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for FY 2005/2006, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discuses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for FY 2005/2006, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to the Landscape Maintenance District within Calendar year 2004. Section 5 Assessment Diagrams Shows the boundaries of the areas to be annexed to the Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 and the general boundaries of the District. For details regarding the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within the Landscape Maintenance District No. 10, refer to the San Bernardino County Assessor's maps. Section 1 - Description of Improvements: Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 (LMD #10) represents landscape sites throughout the Rancho Etiwanda Area. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The various sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, street trees and a neighborhood park. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Ground Cover, Shrubs and Turf 5.61 Parks 10.40 Total Area 10.40 Acres Ground cover, shrubs and turf areas that make up parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. Parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews. Section 2 - Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The budgeted costs for LMD #10 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover, shrubs and the neighborhood park. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing, are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #10 are as follows: Personnel Regular Salaries $6,270.00 Over Time $1,000.00 Part-time Salaries $25,250.00 Fringe Benefits $5,340.00 Subtotal Personnel $37,860.00 Operations Maintenance and Operations Landscaping $3,750.00 Parks $8,500.00 Facilities $4,000.00 Emergency & Routine Vehicle Equipment Rental $1,000.00 Equipment Maintenance $1,000.00 Utilities Water Utilities $37,000.00 Electric Utilities $32,000.00 Contract Services Parks $25,380.00 Parkway & Median Landscape Maintenance $84,570.00 Facilities $9,000.00 Tree Maintenance $2,460.00 Subtotal Operations $208,660.00 Capital Expenditures Outlay/Vehicles $8,000.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $8,000.00 Reserve for Capital Maintenance and Improvements $0.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead 31,780 Total LMD #10 Expenditure Budget $286,300.'00 Prior Year Deficit Recovery $114,944.48 Assessment Revenue Required $401,244.48 Section 3 - Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishments of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment distdct may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one The Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDU's based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single-family home (SFR). The EDU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EDU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS Property Type EDU Value Multiplier Non-Residential Improved 2.00 Acres Single Family Residential 1.00 Unit It is recommended that the rate per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU.) remain at $597.09 for the FY 2005/2006. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: # Of Rate per # Of Equivalent Equivalent Equivalent Unit Physical Dwelling Dwelling Dwelling Land Use Type Units Unit Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Family Unit 672 1.00 672 $597.09 $401,244.48 Total $401,244.48 C. Assessment All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2005/2006, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. Section 4 - Annexations: Calendar Year 2004 Annexations Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 PROJECT UNITS ANNEX DATE TR 16100 29 SF 9/15/2004 TR 14493 15 SF 10/6/2004 Section 5 - Assessment Diagrams: L EXHIBIT "A'~.~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. l0 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRACT NOS. I AND 7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NORTII COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2005/2006 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets) ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant areas therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year 2005/2006, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 16th day of March, 2005. Approved by:. William J. O'Neil, City Engineer TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW ......................................................................................... 4 SECTION I - DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES ............................................ 5 SECTION 2 - ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES .............................. 6 SECTION 3 - METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT ................... 7 A. GENERAL ...................................................................... 7 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ...... . ................................. 7 C. ASSESSMENT ................................................................ 8 SECTION 4 - ANNEXATIONS ................................................................ 9 SECTION 5 - ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS ............................... ~ .............. 10 Overview The FY 2005/2006 Annual Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial streets) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Street Lighting and Light Act of 1972). Section 1 Description of Facilities The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Assessment District consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for FY 2005/2006, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discuses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for FY 2005/2006, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District within Calendar year 2004. Section 5 Assessment Diagrams Shows the boundaries of the areas to be annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and the general boundaries of the District. For details regarding the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1, refer to the San Bernardino County Assessor's maps. 4 Section 1 - Description of Facilities: Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD #1)) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to the citywide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon the energizing of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district. Section 2 - Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The majority of the budgeted operating costs for SLD #1 are for electric utility charges for the streetlights and traffic signals within the district. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #1 are as follows: ...................................................................................... Operations Equip Maintenance and Operations $500.00 Electric Utilities $449,930.00 Subtotal Operations $450,430.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead $178,570.00 Total SLD #'1 Expenditure Budget $629,000.00 Prior Year Deficit Recovery $47,466.23 Assessment Revenue Required $676,466.23 Section 3 - Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishments of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one The Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDU's based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single-family home (SFR). The EDU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EDU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS Property Type EDU Value Multiplier Commercial 2.00 Acres Multi-Family 1.00 Parcel Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel 7 It is recommended that the rate per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU.) remain at $17.77 for the FY 2005/2006. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: Rate per # of Equivalent # of Equivalent Physical Physcial Dwelling Equivalent Dwelling Land Use Unit Type Units Unit Factor Dwelling Unit Unit Revenue Single Family Parcel 22,205 1.00 22,205.00 $17.77 $394,582.85 Multi-Family Parcel 10,449 1.00 10,449.00 $17.77 $185,678.73 Commercial Acre 2,706.94 2.00 5,413.68 $17.77 $96,204.65 Total $676,466.23 C. Assessment All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2005/2006, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. Section 4 - Annexations: Calendar Year 2004 Annexations Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 PROJECT UNITS ANNEX DATE PROJECT UNITS ANNEX DATE TR 16454-1 81 SF 2/4/2004 DRC 2003-00650 .32 AC 9/1/2004 PM 16010 5.95 AC 2/4/2004 TR 16100 29 SF 9/15/2004 PM 15966 10.73 AC 2/4/2004 TR 16421 8 SF 9/15/2004 DRC 2002-00499 264 MF 2/18/2004 PM 16180 4 SF 9/15/2004 DRC 2002-00511 2.5 AC 2/18/2004 TR 16274 7 SF 9/15/2004 DRC 2002-00922 3.75 AC 2/18/2004 TR 14493 15 SF 10/6/2004 PM 16365 11.64 AC 2/18/2004 PM 16282 6.93 AC 10/20/2004 TR 16370 82 SF 2/18/2004 PM 16482 2 SF 10/20/2004 TR 16455 156 MF 2/18/2004 PM 16038 4 SF 11/17/2004 TR 16279-1 74 SF 3/3/2004 PM 16300 14.58 AC 12/1/2004 DRC 2002-00606 19.55 AC 3/3/2004 TR 16301 53 SF 12/15/2004 PM 16123 2 AC 3/3/2004 TR 16445 17 SF 12/15/2004 PM 16124 0.99 AC 3/3/2004 PM 16125 .87 AC 3/3/2004 TR 16432 28 SF 3/3/2004 DRC 2002-00519 .42 AC 3/17/2004 TR 16612 186 MF 3/17/2004 PM 16245 467 MF 3/17/2004 PM 16245 4.22 AC 3/17/2004 PM 15948 9.4 AC 4/7/2004 DRC 2003-00869 16.88 AC 4/7/2004 TR 16374 25 SFD 4/7/2004 DRC 2002-00006 2.3 AC 5/5/2004 TR 16512 168 MF 5/5/2004 DRC 2003-00302 1.42 AC 5/19/2004 TR 16542 11 SF 5/19/2004 DRCDR 00-41 40.55 AC 6/6/2004 DRC 2003-00732 18.10 AC 6/16/2004 PM 157162 13.3 AC 7/7/2004 PM 16167 20.52 AC 7/21/2004 TR 16430 23 SF 7/21/2004 TR 16113 23 SF 7/21/2004 TR 16454 36 SF 8/4/2004 TrR 16545 10 SF 8/4/2004 DRC 2002-00018 2.71 AC 8/18/2004 PM 16118 4.49 AC 9/1/2004 Section 5- Assessment Diagrams: EXHIBIT "A" LANDSCAPE MAIIqTE~AN'CE D/STRICT NO. l ASSESSMENT DiAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DIS'I'RICT NOS. [ AND 2 3 . , ~,~ LEGEIVD 7949,10 ~q. ft. ~.~o,~O~ L__ CITY OF ~NCHO CUCA~O~GA COUNTY OF SAN BE~A~INO STAT~ O~ CALg~O~ ~ ' · ~ O EASEMENT LINE T18 RZW 8BM P~R MB4/p~9 LE~EN~ TRACT 16371 LOT 2 LOT A LOT I 6615 LONG -~ADOW TRACT 16373 '~~~iiii:i"'"-' l" TRACT 16615 . :X:~E?,: VICTORIA ARBORS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NORTil cOUNTY or SAN BERNARmNO STATE OF CALIFORNIA Pff~/~D~ EXHIBIT "A" ~' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM · LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DIsTRIcT NO~ 3B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. ! AND 6 PARCEL ~A? I~,ll~ -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~o~t'rll TRACT 16726 REA BANYAN STREET 20 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 __'~ TRACT 1449,t BLUE SPRUCE DR 8 "'" ~ --~ 22 21 ~ 14 13 12~ 11 9 EXHIBIT ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 2 ---_.-_ . 1~ H-~/2 OF LOT ~')~ 5 1~ 17 · ~ )OP 5 ~?.'¢' ,., : ~ ~::~:~ / ~ %,- ~,$~,0 6 LOOP _~_:,,.,,. _~~ ,,,,,. ~ ,' ~H 8r,~',o' ~ AVENUE ,~.~. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NORTII EXHIBIT "A"-. ~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM .LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DIS~PdCT NO. 7 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 7 I 4 ¢£,ea-r T,,e~'-t's /~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NORTH/z/ COUNTY' OF SAN BERNARDINO [ EXHIBIT "A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM [2klqDSCAPE IvlAIN'rENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE D[STJ~C'T NOS. I AND S Building- A - 236, . ,{ ~ ~ 4' Building D - 19,220 SF' Building F - 3t~550 ~F, - ...... [ ~ LEGEND NO NEW ITEM~ A'D~D TQ ~08~ PBQ~B6~$ ~., CITY OF ~C~O C~CA~ONGA ~ot~ " COU~T~ OF SA~ BER~ARDINO STATE OF CALIFO~IA DRCZOOS-OOS&~ LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DiSTRiCT NOS. I AND 2 ~ J'.-"~ ' -'==.-.,-,. '~ /-.'1 . ,,",;. --- --;I/11 ~ l ,.,,,~'.-.---_; .'---.~x~ iii.. ;; 1':2,.- ~. .. _ :.- -;.:::::-~ ,I'~ :---'o. ..~'-.K._- *,', · '. -'- ".-- - ~T,~E~T I-IC~HT~ .'., .... . cTPEe7- Tiet~ES.. /..,. . , ;:,-_-. :.-_. CITY' OF RANCHO C~CAMONCA COUNTy OF SAN BER~At~J)INO STATE OF CALIFORNIA EXHIBIT "A"-..~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DIsTRIcT NO. l0 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. ! AND 7 LIGHTs CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NORTII COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ~;~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA '~.1/~100 EXHIBIT ASSESSMEI~F DIAGRAIVI LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B sTREET. LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS, ! AND /' I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA DRCZ003-O0~50 EXHIBIT "A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM · ·LANDSCAPE MA. INTENANC£ DISTRICT NO. I STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 2 BANYAN o STREET 5 T~ACT 5 -5800 L ~T~T LI~/~ CITY OF ~NCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BE~A~INO STATE OF CALIFO~IA TR 1~5~5 EXHIBIT "A- ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ~] STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 8 . CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NORTH COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO L~/ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA EXHIBIT "A"- "~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTR~CT NO. 7 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTR/CT NOS. I AND 7 ~IL SL1N A ~'E 5T~-Z-~T Z.-I~-HT$ 2_,~. ~-A. S7,e-~-T 'T~FF ,.~ 17o ~A. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~oR'rH COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA 7~- EXHIBIT ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 2 TRACT 16430 LMD AREA--xxxxx CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NORTII COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 7~ VICINITY MAP · I SuB3'~'e 7' CITY HALL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGI~AIVI LANDSCAPE'MAINT~'~ANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. X ~' { , i~ . -- ~~:.. ~ ~.." { I ~" , Il Ill ,,, ~ .... : ~ [ , ~/,- ;i.i, F~' ~=-I- ~. {~-:~ .... _-- {,_.--~ ill - . k' '~ ' - CT~T L/~H TX 7 ~ CITY OF RANCHO CHCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARnINO · . EXHIBIT 'A - ~ ~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE D[$TRJcT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. { AND 6 LAND$CA?£ MAINTENANCE D/STRICT NO STREET LIGHT/N6 MA/NT£NANC£ D[~TR/CT NO~. ! ,' _ . _.-,u u ' ~'~' ._WkM-! '~ ° '" ., ........ ~' I~ ,~- .......... ~ .~___ ~ ~-'---~ ~ ' , ' '". /i~~~~ ""'" ' ,. , ,, ~~~:i /( ; ...... ~,~ .... T~ .......... d ~--- ........ ,, ....................... ,~ \ CiViC CENTER COUNTY O~ SAN 'EXHIBIT "A"- ~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAIrNTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 8 k ~sro~ k u,~voe couar ~ ST/~EET ~-lOtH TE 5- ~. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NORTH COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO FOOTHILL ~ SUBJI"'C PROPERTY ARROW ROUTE 81-H STREET VICINITY MAP N ~ITY OF rrF, M: ' .ANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: KONS£N 7- ¢ W/{ ~ V~ g - N-~GIN'R,~rNG DIVEgION tg',XI-17Rp'/,:'.I/~. ~'_q~' ~OCK i-LC EXHIBIT "A" - ~. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DIST'/CT NO. '4 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 4 · -' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NORTI! Vicinity Map DRC2002-00006 City of Rancho CucamonRa EXHIBIT "A" ASsESSMEnT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 38 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 · -005'8q PARCELS. (, ~ 7' · .0 I.~,,.. . P~l~ ;'LEGEND : ~ ~00 LU~N HPsV 3-~TREET TREE5 A~bED CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - No?'rH- COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA DRC200I-O0-~ CITY OF ITEM: ~.dt200~ - RANCHO CUCAMONGA T~Tt,E: 9'tdlMIWY' tWA?' ENGINEERING DIVISION EXHIBIT: ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B A./~D I · STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. ! AND 6 , PROJECT LOCATION 4TH ST. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA nor COUNTY OF. SAN BERNARDINO EXH{BIT "A ~',~ # ASSESSMENTDIA~RAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ~ STREET LIGHTINO MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 8 MILLER .A' PROJECT FO 0 TH tLL BOULEVARD CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDiNO. r~or~TH ~ EDISON UTIL[I'Y CORRIDOR DEVELOPMENT ~T ~ VICTORIA AP, BORS AT TRACT NO. 15948 TRACT NO. 15947 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. t57t6 -/~STA~NDARD PACIFIC HOMES ~ ~-, TRACT INDEX ~TH PLANNING AREAS ' 'DOTHILL Major SI,re 8ts City Boundary ASs~ss~.r~rr mACRA~ LANDSCAPE MA~ANCE DISTRICT NO. 313 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTR~CT NOS. I AND 6 I -,~Tp.~z' %p.w~s ~ ~.~. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I~ORTi! COUNTY OF SAN BKRNARDINO ST~,TE O~' C^L~FORmA ~3-~¢ ~ EXHIBIT "A" LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTING MA[NTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND tS ~ er42*~o' W CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA No~[ ~ COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO EXHIBIT "A- Z'~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 2 - L.,,,.. ~\.~. .,:./...~..... ::..r'' "'-' [-7_3-" '" ~-..-" 4./ "--'-' '~'-~!~.---'", 'II ' .' .',.:._ -.~.--~ ..... ,.., ..,._ ...~_,~ !, .:,,.=.,,. , . :~--'-"' ~"'"-'""-~ ...... '-" "' 't" !~'"['~ -,'-'~ .'-". ! '~ ; ~.,_ ..'-~ ~ ' , i .. " ...... "~.::~?,' ' , m! -" ,i, .... .:.~ .. ., . '""~' 5'TI~E~7- L/G-IdTS /4 s~, ~T~E~T T~I~ ~(~ EA. No~,l- T~F A~A ~,~ ~ CITY OF ~NCHO CUCAMONGA ~oam~ //c COUNTY OF SAN BE~ARDINO EXHIBIT "A" ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6. ~,./xe ~'!~ ,.. -~ :. . - ................ _.,'_ ................ --'~' _-:= :_ ....... := '~'~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NORTII COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA P~ E~iHIBIT 'A" ,ASsEsSMENT DiAGR.AlVl LANDSCAPE MAI'NTENAI"{CE DISTRICT' NO. ]B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTR/CT NOS. I AND 6 ~..~.~.~ .... ~ :~ ...... -~ ............. iV~ONROE COURT "- .... ":~:~ L£ -END = .,~ STRF--.ETLi~HT lG, O00 LUt~EN HPSV CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NORTi! COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA P/~ l 6~,.~3 ~0 EXHIBIT "A" ASSESSMENT DIAGRAIVI LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r~OaTH COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA -, · : EXHIBIT "A - Z' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM · .... LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO..q STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND CITY OF RANCHOCUCAMONGA" ~oI~IH 1~"~tK'l~ NO. t 5948 TRACT NO. 159~/ TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO, 15716 ~-' T~TATIVE TRACT NO. 16370 ~ VICTORIA ARBORS AVENU~ vlc'rol;u~ pARK VICTORIA GARDENS SITE BOULEVARD FOOTHILL VICINITY MAP CiTY OF RAHCHO CUCAMONGA ITEM: TITLE: ~ ENGINEERING DIVISION ~ ..~ EXHIBIT: _ , ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS, ! AND 6 ! " :.. ~e~ ~: M~v xTt~£ TP~s ---£,~I,~T/,V~ ~ t/~//~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMO~GA ~o~ COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO EXHIBIT "A" ASsEsSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. i AND 6 ARROW ROUTE · ,P 30' r -.."-N0"~"2.4') 3"1~ 3g5.34' G27. I O' . 332.34' · J oU]u5 o. ~6G/ /-~¢A,,J . 333.09' ~ 293,3 I.' NOD°24' I 3"~ G30.20' 3 b LEGEND E __ WHI~RAM AVENUE ~ ._ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NORTi! COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO /'~) ,qTATE OF CALIFORNIA b~.C2OOA-ot~i/ ASSESSMENT DIAGRA1VI LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 ! CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NOaT./qb COUNTY OF SA~ BERNARDINO ~~ EXHIBIT "A - ~" ASsEsSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. c~ STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE'DISTRICT NOS. I AND 8 ST~,~'T LI~I--IT~ ?~- ~'~' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~oR'rH COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA EXHIBIT "A" ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTING MAI]qTElqANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 LEqENI), { I ~: . - :' I 'S~EET TKEES ' I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NOR-Til COUNTY OF SAN BERNA. RDI~O STATE OF CALIFOI~IA I~. ~V~. I&O{O I ' ' ' ..... '" 'r~ c,'r',' o~ ~^~c"o'm~..O,.,~^ ' ' '.' "*: ' /. ' ' '-.'?:'-.': '~'~'; ~.~.='~i~'.~F~.~:.'~.~'::"~'. PARCEL . J. . PARCEL . - .~/5' ~F ~/~¢ · ' :.'~ ' ' ' .,~- ~ ~,,.,~.,,~ ~, ,~,. :. PPIB b¢'/~~ :- '.. - ' , '' ' ~ DATA ' ' ' ' :"P~TA : : "' " '"' ' '"' · :~/ "'~¢'" / .... ''/'---'1 ,..- ~ ~...~ .,~. ~1:,,,,,-..-. / t ..... .. I.~ II -- · ~.~.I :L,~, - I1~1) Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2005/2006 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 (Local streets) ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets) City of Rancho Cucamonga . San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year 2005/2006, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 16th day of March, 2005. Approved by:. William J. O'Neil, City Engineer 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW ......................................................................................... 4 SECTION I - DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES ............................................ 5 SECTION 2 - ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES .............................. 6 SECTION 3 - METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT ................... 7 A. GENERAL ...................................................................... 7 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ....................................... 7 C. ASSESSMENT ................................................................ 8 SECTION 4 - ANNEXATIONS ................................................................ 9 SECTION 5 - ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS .............................................. Overview The FY 2005/2006 Annual Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 (Local streets) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Street Lighting and Light Act of 1972). Section 1 Description of Facilities The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Assessment District consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for FY 2005/2006, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discuses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for FY 2005/2006, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District within Calendar year 2004. Section 5 Assessment Diagrams Shows the boundaries of the areas to be annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 and the general boundaries of the District. For details regarding the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2, refer to the San Bernardino County Assessor's maps. Section 1 - Description of Facilities: Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (SLD #2) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally, this area encompasses the residential area of the City west of Haven Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit this area of the City. This sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets generally west of Haven Avenue. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district. Section 2 - Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The majority of the budgeted operating costs for SLD #2 are for electric utility charges for the street lights and traffic signals within the district. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #2 are as follows: Operations Electric Utilities $294,000.00 Subtotal Operations $ 294,000.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead $ 54,930.00 Total SLD #2 Expenditure Budget $ 348,930.00 Less Prior Year District Carryover $ 55,028.99 Assessment Revenue Required $ 293,901.01 Section 3 - Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishments of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one The Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDU's based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single-family home (SFR). The EDU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EDU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS Property Type EDU Value Multiplier Commercial 2.00 Acres Multi-Family 1.00 Unit Single Family Residential 1.00 Unit 7 It is recommended that the rate per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU.) remain at $39.97 for the FY 2005/2006. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: # Of Rate per # Of Equivalent Equivalent Equivalent Unit Physical Dwelling Dwelling Dwelling Land Use Type Units Unit Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Family Unit 6216 1.00 6216 $39.97 $248,453.52 Commercial Acre 25.02 2.00 50.04 $39.97 $ 2,000.10 Multi-Family Unit 1087 1.00 1087 $39.97 $43,447.39 Total $293,901.01 C. Assessment All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2005/2006, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. Section 4 - Annexations: Calendar Year 2004 Annexations Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 PROJECT UNITS ANNEX DATE TR 16432 28 SF 3/3/2004 PM 16245 4.22 AC 3/17/2004 TR 16430 23 SF 7/21/2004 TTR 16545 10 SF 8/4/2004 TR 16421 8 SF 9/15/2004 TR 16274 7 SF 9/15/2004 PM 16482 2 SF 10/20/2004 PM 16038 4 SF 11/17/2004 Section 5 - Assessment Diagrams: EXHIBIT "A" ASSESSMENT DIAGI~M LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 2 TRACT 16430 LMD AREA--xxxxx CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NORTH COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 7 EXHIBIT "A"- ~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. ! AND 2 COUNTY OF SAN BERNA~INO EXHIBIT "A" ASSESSMENT DIA GRAM 'LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 2 ~[ BANYAN 0 STREET 4 · 7 , 3 :~.' 8 ,~. ~ 10 T~ACT ~' ~ LEGEND CITY 0F ~NCHO CUCAMONGA NORTII~)~ COUNTY OF SAN BE~A~INO STATE OF CALIFO~IA T~ tGSq5 ~ - ~ ~/' LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 2 - ~~--~. ~ ~,, cTle~eT Tie~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NoR'r~: COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA EXHIBIT "A" ASSESSMENT DIAGR,~iVi LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO, ! STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE D{$TRICT NOS. I AND 2 89'48'28' £ ~_~. ]1~ ~, M.8. 19/.75. EST,~SLI~ BY N 89'~'2~ E (N 89'~' [ ~ CT ~. 16274 ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~' 4 ..¢4~:~ ,~x~ LOOP 6 ~ LOOP 7 u ' ~ .'.'~o' ~ ,m~ AVENUE ~XHIBIT ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTR/CT NO. ! STREET LIGHT/NO MAINTENANCE DI$I'RICT NOS. I AND 2 ~ . , ~ LEC~EI~D o.~8~ ,~. CITY OF ~NCHO CUCAMO~GA cov v STATE O~ ~LIFO~IA PA'R~EL I~AP 1603~ .ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. CIVIC CENTER ~I~ITY OF ITEM: RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: ENGINEERING DIVISION EXHIBIT: ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRI, CT NOS. I AND 2 ~p-E~~ ......... ~ ;- / ... I .-" / ........ ..,,- ..~, .-' 2 .,/ ; . '-1~ J!--: - -' -.-..'-~-?'--'~"~'"~Y-*~ -~' ': ~--~-' '-- ~ - '--' ~' ' ' ' T-" - '. 7=' .. .. .. 2~ .... ~4 , ..~ ,., ~.. { 27 -- .... , ."'--'~ - i 't - ' ": /- ...... . ~' .... ~.. ~ " i .. .j -~' .~ ~ - ~.i ........ ,._... . ~'~. ~ ~" <. :'~. ~d .......1 ..... '~ ~ ~._--4~... ~7- r~--.+ ..... ~., ..... ~:; =k~--' ,~ ...... '-' '-. '~ ~;-' CITY OF ~NCHO CUCAMONGA //u COUNTY OF SAN BE~ARDINO Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2005/2006 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community) ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year 2005/2006, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 16th day of March, 2005. Approved by:. William J. O'Neil, City Engineer 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW ......................................................................................... 4 SECTION 1 - DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES ............................................ 5 SECTION 2 - ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES .............................. 6 SECTION 3 - METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT ................... 7 A. GENERAL ...................................................................... 7 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ....................................... 7 C. ASSESSMENT ................................................................ 8 SECTION 4 - ANNEXATIONS ................................................................ 9 SECTION 5 - ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS .............................................. 10 Overview The FY 2005/2006 Annual Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Street Lighting and Light Act of 1972). Section 1 Description of Facilities The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Assessment District consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for FY 2005/2006, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discuses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for FY 2005/2006, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District within Calendar year 2004. Section 5 Assessment Diagrams Shows the boundaries of the areas to be annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 and the general boundaries of the District. For details regarding the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 10, refer to the San Bernardino County Assessor's maps. Section 1 - Description of Facilities: Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (SLD #3) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located within the Victoria Planned Community. Generally, this area encompasses the area of the City east of Deer Creek Channel, south of Highland Avenue, north of Base Line Road, and west of Etiwanda Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. This sites maintained by the district consist of streetlights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the Victoria Planned Community. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district Section 2 - Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The majority of the budgeted operating costs for SLD #3 are for electric utility charges for the street lights and traffic signals within the district. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #3 are as follows: Operations Maintenance and Operations $5,000.00 Electric Utilities $217,740.00 Subtotal Operations $222,740.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead $51,800.00 Total SLD #3 Expenditure Budget $274,540.00 Prior Year Deficit Recovery $6,593.76 Assessment Revenue Required $281,133.76 Section 3 - Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishments of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which faidy distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit 'of assessment. A single family home equals one The Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDU's based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single-family home (SFR). The EDU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EDU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS Property Type EDU Value Multiplier Commercial 2.00 Acres Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel 7 It is recommended that the rate per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU.) remain at $47.15 for the FY 2005/2006. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: # of # of Equivalent Equivalent Rate per Physical Physical Dwelling Unit Dwelling Equivalent Land Use Unit type Units Factor Units Dwelling Unit Revenue Single Family Parcel 5678 1.0 5678 $47.15 $267,717.70 Multi-Family Parcel 310 1.0 310 $47.15 $5,846.60 Commercial Acre 69.32 2.0 138.64 $47.15 $6,536.88 Vacant 10.95 2.0 21.90 $47.15 $1,032.59 Total $281,133.76 C. Assessment All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2005/2006, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. Section 4 - Annexations: Calendar Year 2004 Annexations Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 PROJECT UNITS ANNEX DATE PM 16365 11.84 AC 2/18/2004 TR 16370 82 SF 2/18/2004 TR 16612 186 MF 3/17/2004 TR 16374 25 SFD 4/7/2004 PM 15716-2 13.3 AC 7/7/2004 TR 16301 53 SF 12/15/2004 TR 16445 17 SF 12/15/2004 Section 5 -Assessment Diagrams: ]0 TRACT 16371 LOT 2 LOT A LOT I 615 MEADOW TRACT 16373 ][ VICTORIA .ARBORS VICINITY MAP CITY HALL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA '~"'"'~-- EDeN UTI!_ffY CORRIDOR" DEVELOPMENT :AT ~ VICTORIA ARBORS (D.R. HORTON) 18CTORIA ARBORS l jl~_ TRACT NO. 15948 TRACT NO. 15947 ~ ~ i15 'rENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 15716 ~~[ =~ TRACT INDEX ~TH PLANNING AREAS LOcJJJlJoN MAP FOOTHILL Subject Site- Proposed Shopping .,- ~' %, ~ ~ ~,~, VICTORIA pARK LAN£ PROJEC1 .~o.'~ ~"~"' SITE BOUL~ARD FOOTHILL VICINITY MAP CiTY OF RAHCHO CUCAMONGA ITEM: - TITLE: ~-/~- l~ ~ ~ · ENGINEERING DIVISION ~ _... EXHIBIT: , Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2005/2006 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the improvements, budgets, parqels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year 2005/2006, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 16TM day of March, 2005. Approved by:. William J. O'Neil, City Engineer TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW ......................................................................................... 4 SECTION 1 - DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES ............................................ SECTION 2 - ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES .............................. 6 SECTION 3 - METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT ................... 7 A. GENERAL ...................................................................... 7 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ....................................... 7 C. ASSESSMENT ................................................................ 8 SECTION 4 - ANNEXATIONS ................................................................ 9 SECTION 5- ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS .............................................. 10 III Overview The FY 2005~2006 Annual Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 (Terre Vista Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Street Lighting and Light Act of 1972). Section 1 Description of Facilities The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Assessment District consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for FY 2005/2006, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discuses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for FY 2005/2006, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report SeCtion 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District within Calendar year 2004. Section 5 Assessment Diagrams Shows the boundaries of the areas to be annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 and the general boundaries of the District. For details regarding the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4, refer to the San Bernardino County Assessor's maps. 4 Section 1 - Description of Facilities: Street Light Maintenance District No. 4 (SLD #4) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located within the Terra Vista Planned Community. Generally, this area encompasses the residential area of the City east of Haven Avenue, south of Base Line Road, north of Foothill Boulevard and west of Rochester Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. This sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof ) on local streets within the Terra Vista Planned Community. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district.street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district. Section 2 - Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The majority of the budgeted operating costs for SLD #4 are for electric utility charges for the street lights and traffic signals within the district. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD ~ are as follows: Operations Maintenance and Operations $38,640.00 Equipment Maintenance $500.00 Electric Utilities $81,820.00 Subtotal Operations $120,960.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead $30,180.00 Total SLD #4 Expenditure Budget $151,140.00 Prior Year Deficit Recovery $26,471.68 Assessment Revenue Required $177,611.68 Section 3 - Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishments of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one The Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDU's based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single-family home (SFR). The EDU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EDU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS Property Type EDU Value Multiplier Commercial 2.00 Acres Multi-Family 0.5 Unit Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel It is recommended that the rate per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU.) remain at $28.96 for the FY 2005/2006. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: # of # of Rate per Physcial Physcial Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Units Unit Factor Units Unit Revenue Multi-Family Unit 6043 0.5 3021.50 $28.96 $87,502.64 Single Family Parcel 2653 1.0 2653.00 $28.96 $76,830.88 Commercial Acre 229.25 2.0 458.50 $28.96 $13,278.16 Total $177,611.68 C. Assessment All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is 'on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2005/2006, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. Section 4 - Annexations: Calendar Year 2004 Annexations Street Light Maintenance District No. 4 PROJECT UNITS ANNEX DATE TR 16512 168 MF 5/5/2004 Section 5 - Assessment Diagrams: EXHiBiT "A" - ~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 4 · ' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NORTI! Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2005/2006 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenadce District No. 5 (Caryn Community) ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 (Caryn Community) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant sections therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year 2005/2006, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 16th day of March, 2005. Approved by:. William J. O'Neil, City Engineer 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW ......................................................................................... 4 SECTION I - DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES ............................................ SECTION 2 - ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES .............................. 6 SECTION 3 - METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT ................... 7 A. GENERAL ...................................................................... 7 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ....................................... 7 C. ASSESSMENT ................................................................ 8 SECTION 4 - ANNEXATIONS ................................................................ 9 SECTION 5 - ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS .............................................. 10 Overview The FY 2005/2006 Annual Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 (Caryn Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Street Lighting and Light Act of 1972). Section 1 Description of Facilities The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Assessment District consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for FY 2005/2006, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discuses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for FY 2005/2006, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District within Calendar year 2004. Section 5 Assessment Diagrams Shows the boundaries of the areas to be annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 and the general boundaries of the District. For details regarding the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5, refer to the San Bernardino County Assessor's maps. Section 1 - Description of Facilities: Street Light Maintenance District No. 5 (SLD #5) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located within the Caryn Planned Community. Generally, this area encompasses the area of the City east of Milliken Avenue, south of Banyan Street, north of Highland Avenue and west of Rochester Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. This sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the Caryn Planned Community. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district. Section 2 - Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The majority of the budgeted operating costs for SLD #5 are for electric utility charges for the street lights and traffic signals within the district. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #5 are as follows: Operations Maintenance and Operations $5,000.00 Electric Utilities $52,790.00 Subtotal Operations $57,790.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead $10,180.00 Total SLD #5 Expenditure Budget $67,970.00 Less Prior Year District Carryover $23,924.20 Assessment Revenue Required $44,045.80 Section 3 - Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishments of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one The Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDU's based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single-family home (SFR). The EDU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EDU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS Property Type EDU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential 1.00 Unit 7 It is recommended that the rate per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU.) remain at $34.60 for the FY 2005/2006. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: # Of Rate per # Of Equivalent Equivalent Equivalent Unit Physical Dwelling Dwelling Dwelling Land Use Type Units Unit Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Family Unit 1273 1.00 1274 34.60 $44,080.40 Total $44,045.80 C. Assessment All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2005/2006, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. Section 4 - Annexations: Calendar Year 2004 Annexations Street Light Maintenance District No. 5 No Annexations Section 5 -Assessment Diagrams: Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2005~2006 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial) ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year 2005/2006, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 16th day of March, 2005. Approved by:. William J. O'Neil, City Engineer 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW ......................................................................................... 4 SECTION 1 - DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES ............................................ 5 SECTION 2 - ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES .............................. 6 SECTION 3 - METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT ................... 7 A. GENERAL ...................................................................... 7 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ....................................... 7 C. ASSESSMENT ................................................................ 8 SECTION 4 - ANNEXATIONS ................................................................ 9 SECTION 5 - ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS .............................................. 10 Overview The FY 2005/2006 Annual Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Street Lighting and Light Act of 1972). Section 1 Description of Facilities The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Assessment District consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for FY 2005/2006, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discuses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for FY 2005/2006, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District within Calendar year 2004. Section 5 Assessment Diagrams Shows the boundaries of the areas to be annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 and the general boundaries of the District. For details regarding the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6, refer to the San Bernardino County Assessor's maps. 4 Section 1 - Description of Facilities: Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (SLD #6) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on commercial and industrial streets throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally, this area encompasses the industrial area of the City south of Foothill Boulevard. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. This sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on industrial or commercial streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on industrial or commercial streets generally south of Foothill Boulevard. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district Section 2 - Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The majority of the budgeted operating costs for SLD #6 is for electric utility charges for the street lights and traffic signals within the district. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #6 are as follows: Operations Maintenance and Operations $800.00 Equipment Maintenance $400.00 Contract Services $38,200.00 Electric Utilities $60,700.00 Subtotal Operations $100,100.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead $12,020.00 Total SLD #6 Expenditure Budget $112,120.00 Prior Year Deficit Recovery $9,350.54 Assessment Revenue Required $121,470.54 Section 3 - Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishments of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Assessment Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of pamel improvements to each other. The Assessment Unit (AU) method of apportionment uses an acre as the basic unit of assessment. The AU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's AU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS Property Type EDU Value Multiplier Commercial/Industrial 1.00 Acres It is recommended that the rate per Assessment Unit (AU.) remain at $51.40 for the FY 2005/2006. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: # of # of Rate per Physical Physical Assessement Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit type Units Unit Factor Units Unit Revenue Comm/Industrial Acre 2363.24 1 2363.24 $51.40 $121,470.54 C. Assessment All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2005/2006, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. 8 Section 4 - Annexations: Calendar Year 2004 Annexations Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 PROJECT UNITS ANNEX DATE PM 16010 5.95 AC 2/4/2004 PM 15966 10.73 AC 2/4/2004 DRC 2002-00511 2.5 AC 2/18/2004 DRC 2002-00922 3.75 AC 2/18/2004 DRC 2002-00606 19.55 AC 3/3/2004 PM 16123 2 AC 3/3/2004 PM 16124 0.99 AC 3/312004 PM 16125 .87 AC 3/3/2004 PM 16245 4.22 AC 3/17/2004 PM 15948 9.4 AC 4/7/2004 DRC 2003-00869 16.88AC 4/7/2004 DRC 2002-00006 2.3 AC 5/5/2004 DRC 2003-00302 1.42 AC 5/19/2004 DRCDR 00-41 40.55 AC 6/6/2004 DRC 2003-00732 18.10 AC 6/16/2004 PM 16167 20.52 AC 7/21/2004 DRC 2002-00018 2.71 AC 8/18/2004 PM 16118 4.49 AC 9/1/2004 DRC 2003-00650 .32 AC 9/1/2004 PM 16282 6.93 AC 10120/2004 PM 16300 14.58 AC 12/1/2004 Section 5- Assessment Diagrams: ]0 EXHIBIT "A" ASsEssMENT DIAGI~AIVI LANDSCAPg MAI'NTI~NANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STRE£T LIGHTING MAINTENANCff. DISTRICT NOS. i AND 6 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~OI~Ti~II~ COUNTY OF SAN BF-RNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA DRC200~-O~SO ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ~SC~E ~~ANCE DtsTmCT NO. 3B pRc2..oo3-oo~_66 ~uildi.g. A 236,400 Building C - 19,220~.SF suildlng u - 19,220 S~' Building F - 31~550 LEGEND NO NE~ ITEMS ~DD~D ~Q WORK PROGRAMS CITY OF RANCHO CUC^MONGA Nowm COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA DRCZO03-O0866,. Id':? EXHIBIT "A" ASsEssMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DIsTRIcT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND'6 PARC£L MAF iE,{ 18 -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~Or~TU COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO tt 0~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA ?ARCEL ~AP l~[I~. ~C~E'M~,r~A~¢~ D~sT~cT ~O. ~ STREET LIGHTING ~INTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. [ AND ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NORTH COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA PUBLIC SIDEWALK EASEMENT i~Ap OF CUC~ONGA LAND3 MB4/PG9 I LEGEND CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NOr~T. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO . STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I. - . ~.~) _ ~' ~C~ ........... '--4 ......... ~' , · Li ~ ~. .~ ~ -~ ~ ........ ............ CIVIC CENTEr cITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN · . EXHIBIT "A - ~- # ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDScApE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B E, KHI~IT ~q ~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAI~VrENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B S~ET LIG~G MA~EN~CE DIST~CT NOS. I AND ~ I I ~T~T iI6#Ts 7 ~. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NORTi! . COUNTY O~ SAN ~ERNAR~NO /~ / FOOTHILL N ARROW ROUTE 8TH STREET VICINITY MAP N ~ITY OF rr~: .'ANCHO CUCAMONGA Tm~ ~oNS £ N 7- ~- ~',411/~ g - ,Vicinity Mar) N.T.S. I~11 IIIIIIIIIIII II F~LI..IIIIIIIIIIIll I1~ UII Ilfllll[llll II l'"i~ l I ~,~4~1~,11 m~_l Hi [ i i i I i i i i -- I-tllltllllld~tl IIH I'l~ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIil DRC2002-00006 City of Rancho Cucamon.qa EXHIBIT ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B ' STREET LIGHTING tvlAII~ITF. NANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 : ,, .PARCEL3. (, ~i'~l T .SLAP,,,. P/'"' '~ i 't-'-'t .LEGEND 5_ TI~EETLLG HT LUMEN HPSV T'REE5 ADDED ARROV'/ -- ROUTE ~- - - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF' SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTEN~.NCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND I STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 L3_I 6TH ST. Y PROJECT LOCATION 4TH ST. ' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF. SAN BERNARDINO ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ~ET LIG~G ~~CE DIST~ NOS. I AND 6 .., .~ ~-7 ~ · ,f'£/f~'tP ZlC_¢/T¢ ~ 44. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFOPJ~[A EXHIBIT "A" ASsEssIVII~I'VT DIAGRA_IVI LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTING MArNTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 ~.24 ~R~ N~ 7.53 ACRES CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO EXHIBIT 'A" ASsEsSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRiCT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. i AND 6. . ~ ..... · ..... ~:.~: ................ ~._~- .-~ ~.- ~,_-.~"~ - - --~:==.-. - -~-_~--- - ~'~ ......... :~-.-.~'_' ......... --- * -' -~-"- 'i{ -- --' ~ ~ · ~., __ -~ ....... ~ ..... ~ ~ a' ~'~' ~ 6 £' ~. " :L ........... 02.' i~ONROF- COURT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA ~O~T~ COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ~? STATE OF CALIFORJNIA p/v~ I~ 12.. ~' EXHIBIT ASsEsSMENT DIAGRAM · · LANDSCAPE MAI'I~FENAHCF.- DISTRICTNO. 3B STREET LIGHTING MAI~rrE~A~CS DIST~ NOS. I AND 6. _. L£6F_.ND ~ $-FF~F-.ETLiGHT iG, O00 LN,~EN HPSV CiTY 0~ RANCRO C~CA~ONC^ COUNTY OF SAN STATE OF CALIFO~IA P~ EXHIBIT "A' ^SsEssMEINT D IAGI:L4aM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 ....... ,: .... .,.'.:: :: : ;'~ : ' .... .... . -. ~ ~ .... :~, :.~;~.:~ ...... . : -,'~. · ~,.~; ;:::-,::J:: ":" /. '--:.: , · ..-~ LEGEND · 2~ ~E~TREE5 ON CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NORTII COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA ASSESSMENT DIAGKAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STKEET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE D[$T~CT NOS. i AND 6 ~'~ $iff~ff'k-f ~.~,.~.~. .~ . . ! 72:..~.-( ~ ~.'~t~:: ..... EXHIBIT · ASsEsSMENT DiAGRAM ; · LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. t AND ARROW ROUTE N09°24' ~ O"E G30. I 9' 333~09~ ~z 203.3 I.' 3 b LEGEND ~ o ~ __ WHI~RAM AVENUE _ .__ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NORTI! COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO gTATE OF CALIFORNIA EXHIBIT "A' ASSESSMENT DIAGI~ LANDSCAPE MAIri~ENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTIrNG t~II~ENANCE DISTRICT NOS. i AND 6 G ~'". STREET I , ' I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NOR-TH COUNTY O~ SAN STATE OF CALI~O~IA ~. 16010 A-_3 : '- 7~ ... ,... ....... ....~,.......,,..., ~.:., :..~. ~ p...... :..-'--,.: .....,17.:.~....: ....a.~ ~.~ ...,......: ..~....: ~ '. ' IN THE Cl'1"l' OF RAN~O ~AHONUA ' .. ' '. ': . :. '..- ~ : ·; :'"'.c~( ~' ]~.. : 'J~ARY. ~"7'. c . P~ 'K., .Va'il~(~' " '..' :: R;C.(."~7.9:~. ": . .. ."~." ..':," ' ."" ',. - · ~ : -.:. . · .... .. ~.~/~' ~SC[E MA~ -N0..~725' ' ' :" · ' ~' .5 ? ~ .., '~-~ ~ . · ~ [~ ~ "'~1 · . AR~ MAP PARCEL" 'sZ! "' :"~ " . .,: .. .. .. . ~: : ~.j.}.' .:,'. ~' : . ...' . .'..:'" ..":~-.: .:._ ': : .'Y.' .. [i ~ ..~,,., , ..... ., ...,...,...... ..... ~$ ,-',,'.~1, ,/~--/, , .... ..,.. ,,_..,..... ...... ..,,..,.,.,_, ..... .,,.,,. I~I I I '-f I/:1.' 'f ':/, .:/~ ~? Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2005/2006 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year 2005/2006, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 16th day of March, 2005. Approved by:. William J. O'Neil, City Engineer 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW ........~ ................................................................................ 4 SECTION I - DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES ...................................... SECTION 2 - ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES .............................. 6 SECTION 3 - METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT ................... 7 A. GENERAL ............................................................ ' .......... 7 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ....................................... 7 C. ASSESSMENT ................................................................ 8 SECTION 4 - ANNEXATIONS ................................................................ 9 SECTION 5 - ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS .............................................. 10 Overview The FY 2005/2006 Annual Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Street Lighting and Light Act of 1972). Section 1 Description of Facilities The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Assessment District consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, i.ncluding incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for FY 2005/2006, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discuses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for FY 2005/2006, and describes each assessable lOt or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District within Calendar year 2004. Section 5 Assessment Diagrams Shows the boundaries of the areas to be annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 and the general boundaries of the District. For details regarding the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7, refer to the San Bernardino County Assessor's maps. Section 1 - Description of Facilities: Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (SLD #7) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets in what is termed the North Etiwanda area of the City. Generally, this area encompasses the area of the City east of Day Creek Channel and north of Highland Avenue within the incorporated area of the city. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the North Etiwanda area. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district. Section 2 - Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The majority of the budgeted operating costs for SLD #7 are for electric utility charges for the street lights and traffic signals within the district. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #7 are as follows: Operations Electric Utilities $15,840.00 Subtotal Operations $15,840.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead $15,220.00 Total SLD #7 Expenditure Budget $31,060.00 Prior Year Deficit Recovery $34,213.88 Assessment Revenue Required $65,273.88 Section 3 - Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishments of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment distdct may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one The Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDU's based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single-family home (SFR). The EDU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EDU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS Property Type EDU Value Multiplier Commercial/Industrial 2.00 Acres Single Family Residential 1.00 Unit 7 It is recommended that the rate per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU.) remain at $33.32 for the FY 2005/2006. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: Equivalent Rate per Physical Unit # of Dwelling Unit # of Equivalent Equivalent Land Use Type Physical Units Factor Dwelling Unit Dwelling Unit Revenue Single Family Unit 1949 1 1949 $33.32 $64,940.68 Comm/ind Acre 5 2 10 $33.32 $333.20 Total $65,273.88 C. Assessment All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2005/2006, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. Section 4 - Annexations: Calendar Year 2004 Annexations Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 PROJECT UNITS ANNEX DATE TR 16113 23 SF 7/21/2004 TR 16100 29 SF 9/15~2004 PM 16180 4 SF 9/15/2004 TR 14493 15 SF 10/6/2004 Section 5- Assessment Diagrams: EXHIBIT "A"- ,~t- ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 STREET LIGHTiNG MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 7 ~IZL SL~N A ~ ~-,~. EA. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COVNTV OF S^N ST^T~ O~ C^~.~O~A7-g-./~//~ Om I EXHIB[T "A "-'.~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. l0 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 7 i I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SORT. EXHIBIT ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCA~PE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 7 4 CItY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA cOUNTy o~ SAN ~E~A~mNO STA~E OF CALIFORNIA ~ TRACT 16726 G ........... BANYAN STREET -. 19 20 14495 BLUE 8 22 21 ~ 14 15 12 11 9 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2005/2006 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year 2005/2006, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 16th day of March, 2005. Approved by:. William J. O'Neil, City Engineer 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW ......................................................................................... 4 SECTION 1 - DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES ............................................ $ SECTION 2 - ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES .............................. 6 SECTION 3 - METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT ................... 7 A. GENERAL ...................................................................... 7 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ....................................... 7 C. ASSESSMENT ................................................................ 8 SECTION 4 - ANNEXATIONS ................................................................ 9 SECTION 5 - ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS .............................................. 10 Overview The FY 2005/2006 Annual Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Street Lighting and Light Act of 1972). Section 1 Description of Facilities The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Assessment District consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for FY 2005/2006, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discuses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the pamels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for FY 2005/2006, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District within Calendar year 2004. Section 5 Assessment Diagrams Shows the boundaries of the areas to be annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 and the general boundaries of the District. For details regarding the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8, refer to the San Bernardino County Assessor's maps. 4 Section 1 - Description of Facilities: Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 (SLD #8) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets in what is termed the South Etiwanda area of the City. Generally, this area encompasses the area of the City east of Etiwanda avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard and south of Highland Avenue within the incorporated area of the City. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the South Etiwanda area. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district.. Section 2 - Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The majority of the budgeted operating costs for SLD #8 is for electric utility charges for the street lights and traffic signals within the district. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #8 are as follows: Operations Electric Utilities $3,960.00 Subtotal Operations $3,960.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead $27,340.00 Total SLD #8 Expenditure Budget $31,300.00 Prior Year Deficit Recovery $333,112.75 Assessment Revenue Required $364,412.75 Section 3 - Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishments of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which faidy distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one The Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDU's based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single-family home (SFR). The EDU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EDU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS Property Type EDU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential 1.00 Unit 7 It is recommended that the rate per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU.) remain at $193.75 for the FY 2005/2006. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: #of # of Equivalent Equivalent Rate per Physical Unit Physical Dwelling Unit Dwelling Equivalent Land Use type Units Factor Unit Dwellin,q Unit Revenue Single Family Unit 900 1 900 $193,75 $174,375.00 Multi-family Unit 958 1 958 $193.75 $185,612,50 Comm Acre 11.42 2 22.84 $193.75 $4~425.25 Total $364,412.75 C. Assessment All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2005/2006, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. Section 4 - Annexations: Calendar Year 2004 Annexations Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 PROJECT UNITS ANNEX DATE TR 16454-1 81 SF 2/4/2004 TR 16455 156 MF 2/18/2004 TR 16279-1 74 SF 3/3/2004 DRC 2002-00519 .42 AC 3/17/2004 TR 16542 11 SF 5/19/2004 TR 16454 36 SF 8/4/2004 Section 5 - Assessment Diagrams: EXHIBIT "A - 5 # ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. q STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 8 . CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NORTH COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ~ ,~'rr, c~ r~ ~ ~ ~n~ N~ ~, Tie. EXHIBIT "A "- ~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE IVlAI'NTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 STREET LIGHTFNG MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 8 STIZ~-~-'T' T,e_.[ ~ ~ ~4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAWIONGA ~iOl~T,I COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DiSTPJCT NO. ~ STREET LIGHTING 'MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND.8 MILLER PROJECT FO 0 TH tLL BOULEVARD CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~' COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ~OnT~ EXHIBIT "A - Zs' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM - - LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 8. I EXHIBIT "A -;z~' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. q STI~ET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 8 STREET LIGHT5 7+ ~. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NORTH COUNTY oF SAN BERNAr~mNO STATE OF CALIFORNIA 7~-/&'~4- ~ Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2005~2006 City of Rancho Cucamonga PARKS AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD-85 Approved: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer TABLE OF CONTENTS Authority for Report ..................................................................... 3 Findings ..................................................................... 3 District Analysis ..................................................................... 3 Estimate of Work ..................................................................... 4 Method of Spread ........................................................................ 6 Projected 2004/05 Assessments ................................................. 8 Calendar Year Annexations ................................................ 9 2 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Report PD-85 Fiscal Year 2005/2006 AUTHORITY FOR REPORT This report for the 2005/2006 fiscal year is prepared pursuant to the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho C uoamonga and in compliance with the requirements of ^rtic[e 4, Chapter 1, Landscape and Lighting ^or of 1972, being Division 15, Section 22500 of the Streets and Highways code. Provisions for this annual assessment are included in Chapter 3 of the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. The purpose of this report is to set forth findings and the assessment analysis for the annual levy of assessments for the Parks and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85, thereafter referred to as "the District". This District, using direct benefit assessments, has been created to provide funds to finance the cost of construction, maintenance, operation and debt payment of Heritage Community Park and Red Hill Community Park in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. FINDINGS Section 22573, Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, requires assessments to be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. The section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The means of determining whether or not a parcel will benefit from the improvements is contained in the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7, commencing with Section 5000 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California). The 1972 Act also provides for the classification of various areas within an assessment district into benefit areas where, by reason of variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive differing degrees of all territory receiving substantially the same degree of benefit from the improvements and may consist of contiguous or noncontiguous areas. As the assessments are levied on the basis of benefit, they are considered a user's fee, not a tax; and, therefore, are not governed by Article XlIIA. Properties owned by public agencies, such as a city, county, state, or the federal government are not assessable without the approval of the particular agency and, normally, are not assessed. Certain other parcels used for railroad mainline right-of-way, public utility transmission right-of-way, and common areas are also exempt from assessment. The assessment for mobile home parks will be based upon underlying lot acreage. DISTRICT ANALYSIS A. Improvement District Boundary The improvement district includes all of the City of Rancho Cucamonga with the general exception of land east of Deer Creek Channel and the Victoria, Caryn & Terra Vista Planned Communities. All parcels of real property affected are more padicularly described in maps prepared in accordance with Section 327 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, which are on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor in the Hall of Records, 172 West Third Street, San Bernardino, California and which are hereby made a part hereof by reference. B District Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Improvement District No. PD - 85. C. Facilities The existing works of improvement are generally described as follows: 1. The construction of Heritage Community Park including, but not limited to, grading, planting, irrigation, onsite roads, sidewalks, parking lots, lighting, restrooms, equestrian facilities, playground equipment, picnic facilities, athletic facilities, and walking, jogging and equestrian trails. 2. The construction of Red Hill Community Park including, but not limited to, grading, planting, irrigation, onsite roads, sidewalks, parking lots, lighting, waterscape, restrooms, senior citizen facilities, playground equipment, picnic facilities, major lighted athletic facilities, jogging trail, underground storm drain system, and adjacent public street improvements. D. The assessment rate for the 2004/2005 FY is $52.00; this rate will not increase for the 2005/06 FY. It is estimated that this assessment rate will cover the district's maintenance and operation expenses for the 2005/06 FY. ESTIMATE OF WORK The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 permits carrying forward surpluses or recovering deficits in subsequent fiscal years. Costs for the district will be reviewed annually. Any surplus credited against assessment or any deficits shall be included in the assessment for the following fiscal year. 4 Proposed Maintenance Budget: Personnel Regular Payroll $362,250.00 Overtime Payroll $2,500.00 Part Time Salaries $23,940.00 Fringe Benefits $179,650.00 Subtotal: $568,340.00 Operations & Maintenance $92,450.00 Maintenance & Operations - Facilities $15,000.00 Vehicle Maintenance & Operations $5,000.00 Emergency & Routine Vehicle & Equip. Rental $4,000.00 Equipment Maintenance $11,000.00 Contract Services $17,800.00 Contract Services - Facilities $12,000.00 Tree Maintenance $13,240.00 Payment to Trustee $680,480.00 Water Utilities $108,150.00 Electric Utilities $135,250.00 Telephone Utilities $5,500.00 Subtotal: $1,099,870.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Outlay/Equipment $73,800.00 Subtotal: $73,800.00 Assessment Admin. and General Overhead $276,150.00 Subtotal: $276,150.00 Gross Revenue Required $2,018,160.00 Less Prior Year District Carryover $196,106.00 Assessment Revenue Required: $1,822,054.00 METHOD OF SPREAD The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 indicates that assessments may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes costs among all lots or parcels within the District in proportion to the estimated benefit received. A. Definitions The District is divided into three categories for the purpose of determining the assessments as follows: CATEGORY A - includes parcels based on the number of existing residential units within certain ranges of parcel size. CATEGORY B - includes all parcels not defined in Category A or Category C. CATEGORY C - includes exempt parcels. Exempt parcels were discovered by searching the County Assessor's computer tapes for those parcels that are listed as exempt by the Assessor or which have an assessed value of less than $500. In conducting the search, several parcels were included as exempt that show parcel sizes in excess of 1.5 acres and type codes of, for example, residential or agriculture. These parcels were added back into the rolls and assessed. B Formula The assessment formula is based on actual land use information contained in the current San Bernardino Assessor's computer files and Assessor's parcel maps, Category A: All parcels containing existing residential dwelling units and meeting the following conditions. Parcel Size Range Dwelling Units/Parcel Less than 1.5 Acres and 1 or more dwelling units 1.51 to 3.5 Acres and 2 or more dwelling units 3.51 to 7.0 Acres and 4 or more dwelling units 7.01 to 14.0 acres and 8 or more dwelling units 14.01 to 25.0 acres and 15 or more dwelling units 25,01 acres & larger 26 or more dwelling units Category A is based on the number of existing residential units. The actual assessment for Bond Debt Service per existing residential dwelling unit may decrease each year as more residential units are built within the improvement district. Maintenance costs, however, are expected to increase annually and will somewhat offset the anticipated decrease in assessments due to new development. Category B: All parcels not defined in Category A or Category C. 6 Category C: All exempt parcels as defined below: 1. All properties currently tax exempt; 2. All public ownership; 3. Railroad mainline rights-of-way 4. Major utility transmission rights-of-way; 5. Mineral rights; 6. Parcels so small they currently cannot be built upon; All normally assessable parcels within an assessed valuation of less than $500 and 1.5 acres or less; and, C. Summary of Preliminary Assessment Amounts Category A: The preliminary estimated assessment rate, which will be levied during fiscal year 2005/06, is $52.00 per dwelling unit for those parcels in Category A. Category A parcels containing more than one residential dwelling unit will be assessed for an amount equal to $52.00 times the number of dwelling units. Category B: The assessment, which may be levied for parcels within Category B during fiscal year 2004/05, shall be according to the following schedule: Definition Assessment per Parcel less than 1.50 acres $26.00 1.51 acres to 3~50 acres $78.00 3.51 acres to 7.0 acres $182.00 7.01 acres to 14.0 acres $364.00 14.01 acres to 25.0 acres $728.00 25.01 acres & larger $1,300.00 Category C: The assessment shall be $0.00 for Category C parcels. PROJECTED 2005~2006 ASSESSMENTS: Number of Assessment Units Rate Assessment Single Family Parcels 23,582 $52.00 $1,226,264.00 Multi-Family Parcels 7,759 $52.00 $403,468.00 Less than 1.50 Acres (1084 Parcels) 1,084 $26.00 $28,184.00 1.5 Acres to 3.50 Acres (381 Parcels) 381 $78.00 $29,718.00 3.51 Acres to 7.0 Acres (194 Parcels) 194 $182.00 $35,308.00 7.01 Acres to 14.0 Acres (108 Pamels) 108 $364.00 $39,312.00 14.01 Acres to 25.0 Acres (50 Parcels) 50 $728.00 $36,400.00 25.01 Acres or larger (18 Parcels) 18 $1,300.00 $23,400.00 33,176 $1,822,054.00 Calendar Year 2004 Annexations Parks and Recreation District - PD-85 PROJECT UNITS ANNEX DATE PM 16010 5.95 AC 2/4/2004 PM 15966 10.73 AC 2/4/2004 DRC 2002-00499 264 MF 2/18/2004 DRC 2002-00511 2.5 AC 2/18/2004 DRC 2002-00922 3.75 AC 2/18/2004 TR 16432 28 SF 3/3/2004 PM 16245 467 MF 3/17/2004 PM 16245 4.22 AC 3/17/2004 PM 15948 9.4 AC 4/7/2004 DRCDR 00-41 40.55 AC 6/6/2004 PM 16167 20.52 AC 7/21/2004 TR 16430 23 SF 7/21/2004 TTR 16545 10 SF 8/4/2004 PM 16118 4.49 AC 9/1/2004 TR 16421 8 SF 9/15/2004 TR 16274 7 SF 9/15/2004 PM 16282 6.93 AC 10/20/2004 PM 16482 2 SF 10/20/2004 PM 16038 4 SF 11/17/2004 PM 16300 14.58 AC 12/1/2004 TH E CITY OF ~ANC~O CUCAMONGA Sti ff Report DATE: March 16, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Erica Darplee, Management Analyst I SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF THE RESOLUTIONS APPROVING AND CONFIRMING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT AND SETTING OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR MAY 18, 2005, TO LEVY THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2004/2005 FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 AND 10. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE IS PROPOSED. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the Engineer's Reports ~nd set the Public Hearing for May 18, 2005, to levy the annual assessments for Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10. It is recommended that there be no increase in the assessment rates in these districts for Fiscal Year 2005~2006. The Engineer's Reports are on file in the City Clerk's Office. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: It is recommended that the assessment rates remain at existing levels for all Landscape Maintenance District for FY 2005/2006. The water conservation efforts implemented within the landscape maintenance districts continue to help keep costs down, allowing the assessment rates to remain at the same levels as the rates for FY 2004/2005. In many of the districts, back taxes have been paid with interest and penalties thereby increasing the revenue in those districts. In some district, an increase in the amount of landscaped area has caused an increase in the amount of maintenance and operation costs. However, this cost will be offset by corresponding increases in revenue received from new developments below the annual assessment revenue requirements. This offsetting mechanism still holds true and has allowed the assessment rate to remain constant. The following, along with reference to the Engineer's Reports, identifies proposed FY 2005/2006 rates: CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS March 17, 2004 Page 2 Assessment Rate Landscape Maintenance District Per Assessment Unit LMD # 1 - General City $ 92.21 LMD # 2 - Victoria Planned Community $422.00 LMD # 3A- Hyssop $413.74 LMD # 3B - Commerical/Industrial $352.80 LMD # 4 - Terra Vista Planned Community $252.50 LMD # 5 - Tot Lot $113.29 LMD # 6 - Caryn Planned Community $246.97 LMD # 7 - North Etiwanda $307.05 LMD # 8 - South Etiwanda $151.45 LMD # 9 - Lower Etiwanda $375.91 LMD # 10 - Rancho Etiwanda $597.09 Respectfully submitted, City Engineer W JO:MT:sc Attachment -2- RESOLUTION NO. ~)5" //~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FOR APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 AND 10. NO INCREASE OFASSESSMENT RATE PROPOSED. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve that: WHEREAS, pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, the City Engineer is required to make and file with the City Clerk of said City an annual report in writing for which assessments are to be levied and collected to pay the costs of the maintenance and/or improvement of said Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1,2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, should not be modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby order as follows: 1. That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses of said work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed. 2. That the diagrams showing the Assessment District referred to and described in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approve and confirmed. 3. That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in said Assessment Districts in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby approved and confirmed. 4. That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Annual Report for the fiscal year 2005/2006 for the subsequent proceedings. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9AND 10 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2005/2006 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, does resolve as follows: Description of Work SECTION 1: That the public interest and convenience require and it is the intention of this City Council to levy and collect assessments within Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 for the fiscal year 2005/2006 for the maintenance and operation of those street lights, traffic signals and facilities thereon dedicated for common purposes by deed or recorded subdivision tract map within the boundaries of said Districts. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of street lighting maintenance (including repair removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement providing for illumination of the subject area) in connection with said districts. Location of Work SECTION 2: The foregoing described work is to be located within the roadway rights-of- way and easements enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps that are on file in the City Clerk's office, entitled "Assessment Diagrams Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1,2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10." Description of Assessment District SECTION 3: that the contemplated work, in the opinion of said City Council, is of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the work chargeable upon the districts, which said districts are assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which districts are described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 ", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 2", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 4", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 5", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 6", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 7", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 8", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 9", and "Map of Landscape Maintenance District CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS March 16, 2005 Page 2 No. 10", indicating by said boundary lines the extent of the territory included within each assessment district and which maps are on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference is hereby made to said maps for further, full and more particular description of said assessment districts, and the said maps so on file shall govern for all details as to the extent of said assessment districts. Report of Engineer SECTION 4: The City Council of said City by Resolution No. approved the annual report of the City Engineer, which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessments, the district boundaries, assessment zones, and the method of assessment. The report titled "Annual Engineer's Report" is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. Time and Place of Hearing SECTION 5: Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing is hereby scheduled in the Civic Center Council Chambers, 10500 Civic Center Drive, City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730. WEDNESDAY, May 18, 2005, AT 7:00 P.M. Any and all persons may appear and show cause why said maintenance and service for the existing improvements and the proposed improvements should not be done or carried out or why assessments should not be levied and collected for fiscal year 2005/2006. Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 SECTION 6: All the work herein proposed shall be done and carried through in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated as the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. Publication of Resolution of Intention SECTION 7: Published notice shall be made pursuant to Section 6061 of the Government Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. TH E CITY OF ]~AN C H 0 ClICAH 0 N GA Staff Report DATE: March 16, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Erica Darplee, Management Analyst I SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF THE RESOLUTIONS APPROVING AND CONFIRMING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT AND SETTING OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR MAY 18, 2005, TO LEVY THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2005/2006 FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7AND 8. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE IS PROPOSED. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the Engineer's Reports and set the Public Hearing for May 18, 2005, to levy the annual assessments for Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8. It is recommended that there be no increase in the assessment rates in these districts for Fiscal Year 2005/2006. The Engineer's Reports are on file in the City Clerk's Office. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Below is an itemized analysis on a district-by-district basis. To summarize, the assessment rates for all eight Street Lighting Maintenance Districts are recommended to remain at existing levels for the upcoming fiscal year. These assessments cover the actual costs of the districts. The expenditure budgets in all of the districts have been increased due to Southern California Edison electric rate increases. In the past, any available prior year carryover has been used to maintain assessments within the annual assessment revenue requirements. This policy continues for FY 2005/2006 and will allow the assessment rates to remain unchanged. The following, in conjunction with reference to the Engineer's Reports, identifies proposed FY 2005/2006 rates that are recommended to remain the same as FY 2004/2005 rates. The assessment rate for each Street Lighting Maintenance District is as follows: /55 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS March 17, 2004 Page 2 Assessment Rate Street Liqhting Maintenance District Per Assessment Unit SLMD # 1 - Arterial $17.77 SLMD # 2 - General City Local $39.97 SLMD # 3 - Victoria Planned Community $47.15 SLMD # 4 - Terra Vista Planned Community $28.96 SLMD # 5 - Caryn Planned Community $34.60 SLMD # 6 - Commercial/Industrial $51.50 SLMD # 7 - North Etiwanda $33.32 SLMD # 8 - South Etiwanda $193.75' *This proposed rate is higher than the average lighting district due to a disproportionate number of streetlights to assessment units. Respectfully submitted, City Engineer W JO:MT:sc Attachments RESOLUTION NO. ~),,,~-- a RESOLUTION Of THE CITY COUNCIL Of THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FOR APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORTS FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE PROPOSED. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve that: WHEREAS, pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, the City Engineer is required to make and file with the City Clerk of said City an annual report in writing for which assessments are to be levied and collected to pay the costs of the maintenance and/or improvement of said Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said reports and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said reports, nor any part thereof, should not be modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby order as follows: 1. That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses of said work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said reports be hereby approved and confirmed. 2. That the diagrams showing the Assessment District referred to and described in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment Districts are hereby approved and confirmed. 3. That the proposed assessments upon the subdivisions of land in said Assessment Districts in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said reports are hereby approved and confirmed. 4. That said reports shall stand as the City Engineer's Annual Reports for the fiscal year 2005/2006 for the subsequent proceedings. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1,2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2005/2006 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, does resolve as follows: Description of Work SECTION 1: That the public interest and convenience require and it is the intention Of this City Council to levy and collect assessments within Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 for the fiscal year 2005/2006 for the maintenance and operation of those street lights, traffic signals and facilities thereon dedicated for common purposes by deed or recorded subdivision tract map within the boundaries of said districts. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of street lighting maintenance (including repair removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement providing for illumination of the subject area) in connection with said districts. Location of Work SECTION 2: The foregoing described work is to be located within the roadway rights-of-way and easements enumerated in the reports of the City Engineer and described on maps that are on file in the City Clerk's office, entitled "Assessment Diagram Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1,2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8." Description of Assessment District SECTION 3: That the contemplated work, in the opinion of said City Council, is of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the work chargeable upon the districts, which said districts are assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which districts are described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7" and "Map of Street Lighting CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS March 16, 2005 Page 2 Maintenance District No. 8" indicating by said boundary lines the extent of the territory included within said assessment districts and which maps are on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference is hereby made to said maps for further, full and more particular description of said assessment districts, and the said maps so on file shall govern for all details as to the extent of said assessment districts. Report of En.qineer SECTION 4: The City Council of said City by Resolution No. approved the annual reports of the City Engineer, which reports indicates the amount of the proposed assessments, the district boundaries, assessment zones, and the method of assessment. The reports titled "Annual Engineer's Report" 'are on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said reports is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. Time and Place of Hearin.q SECTION 5: Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing is hereby scheduled in the Civic Center Council Chambers, 10500 Civic Center Drive, City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730. WEDNESDAY, May 18, 2005, AT 7:00 P.M. Any and all persons may appear and show cause why said maintenance and service for the existing improvements and the proposed improvements should not be done or carried out or why assessments should not be levied and collected for fiscal year 2005/2006. Landscapin,q and Li,qhting Act of 1972 SECTION 6: All the work herein proposed shall be done and carried through in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated as the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. Publication of Resolution of Intention SECTION 7: Published notice shall be made pursuant to Section 6061 of the Government Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT StaffReport DATE: March 16, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Erica Darplee, Management Analyst I SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF THE RESOLUTIONS APPROVING AND CONFIRMING THE ENGINEER'S REPORTS AND SETTING OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR MAY 18, 2005, TO LEVY THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2005/2006 FOR THE PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-85). NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE IS PROPOSED. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council approve the Engineer's Reports and set the Public Hearing for May 18, 2005, to levy the annual assessments for the Park and Recreation Improvement District (PD-85). It is recommended that there be no increase in assessment rates in this district for Fiscal Year 2005/2006. The Engineer's Reports are on file in the City Clerk's Office. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS This Park and Recreation Improvement District was created to provide funds to finance the cost of construction, maintenance, operation and debt payment of Heritage Community Park and Red Hill Community Park. Heritage Community Park is a 40-acre facility located on the southwest corner of Hillside Road and Beryl Street. Red Hill Community Park is 42 acres and is located on the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Vineyard Avenue. The District boundary includes all of the City of Rancho Cucamonga with the general exception of land east of the Deer Creek Channel and the Victoria and Terra Vista Planned Communities. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD-85 March 17, 2004 Page 2 Pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, each year the City Council must adopt resolutions giving approval of the Engineer's Report and declaring its intention to levy and collect assessments for the upcoming fiscal year. It is recommended that the assessment rates in PD-85 remain at existing levels for Fiscal Year 2005/2006. Assessments for PD-85 will be levied according to the following schedule: Definition Assessment per Parcel Single Family Residential $52.00 Less than 1.50 acres $26.00 1.51 acres to 3.50 acres $78.00 3.51 acres to 7.00 acres $182.00 7.01 acres to 14.00 acres $364.00 14.01 acres to 25.00 acres $728.00 25.01 acres and Larger $1,300.00 Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer W JO:MT:sc Attachments RESOLUTION NO. ~,~"' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COLrNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FOR APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORT FOR PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-85). NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE PROPOSED. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve that: WHEREAS, pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, the City Engineer is required to make and file with the City Clerk of said City an annual report in writing for which assessments are to be levied and collected to pay the costs of the maintenance and/or improvement of said Park and Recreation Improvement District (PD-85); and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said repor[ and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, should not be modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby order as follows: 1. That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses of said work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and it is hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed. 2. That the diagram showing the Assessment Distdct referred to and described in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approve and confirmed. 3. That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in said Assessment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby approved and confirmed. 4. That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Annual Report for the fiscal year 2005/2006 for the subsequent proceedings. RESOLUTION NO. ~' ///~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN PARKAND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-85) FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2005/2006 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cuoamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, does resolve as follows: Description of Work SECTION 1: That the public interest and convenience require and it is the intention of this City Council to levy and collect assessments within Park and Recreation Improvement District (PD-85) for the fiscal year 2004/2005 for the maintenance and operation and debt service payment of Red Hill Community Park and Heritage Community Park thereon dedicated for common purposes by deed or recorded subdivision tract map within the boundaries of said district. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of landscape maintenance (including repair removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement) in connection with said district. Location of Work SECTION 2: The foregoing described work is to be located within the Red Hill Community Park and Heritage Community Park enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and described on maps that are on file in the City Clerk's office, entitled "Assessment Diagram Park and Recreation Improvement District (PD-85)." Description of Assessment District SECTION 3: That the contemplated work, in the opinion of said City Council, is of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the work chargeable upon the district, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Park and Recreation Improvement District (PD-85)", indicating by said boundary lines the extent of the territory included within said assessment district and which maps are on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference is hereby made to said map for further, full and more particular description of said assessment district, and the said map so on file shall govern for all details as to the extent of said assessment district. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS March 16, 2005 Page 2 Report of EnRineer SECTION 4: The City Council of said City by Resolution No. approved the annual report of the City Engineer, which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessments, the district boundaries, assessment zones, and the method of assessment. The report titled "Annual Engineer's Report" is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. Time and Place of Hearin.q SECTION 5: Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing is hereby scheduled in the Civic Center Council Chambers, 10500 Civic Center Drive, City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730. WEDNESDAY, May 18, 2005, AT 7:00 P.M. Any and all persons may appear and show cause why said maintenance and service for the existing improvements and the proposed improvements should not be done or carried out or why assessments should not be levied and collected for fiscal year 2005/2006. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or objections will be considered. If the signer of any protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll, such protest must contain or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. Landscaping and Li.qhtin.q Act of 1972 SECTION 6: All the work herein proposed shall be done and carried through in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated as the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. Publication of Resolution of Intention SECTION 7: Published notice shall be made pursuant to Section 6061 of the Government Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE: March 16, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer SUBJECT: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 19.20 TO TITLE 19 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO THE PROTECTION AND REGULATION OF THE CITY'S MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM (MS4) AS REQUIRED BY FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS (SECOND READING) RECOMMENDATION It is in the best interest of the City to establish guidelines and procedures for control in a cost-effective manner of the quantity and quality of storm water and urban runoff to the maximum extent practicable, through the adoption of this ordinance and the consolidation and codification of its previously adopted ordinances, including Ordinance No. 512, as required by Federal and State laws. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The City of Rancho Cucamonga ("City") is a co-permittee, along with the County of San Bernardino, the San Bernardino County Flood Control District and other designated cities under the "National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit and Waste Discharge Requirements-NPDES No. CAS6188036, Order No. R8-2002-0012- for the San Bernardino County Flood Control District, the County of San Bernardino and the Incorporated Cities within the Santa Ana Region Area-wide Urban Stormwater Runoff", dated April 26, 2002 (the "Municipal NPDES Permit"), issued by the California Regional Water Quality Board - Santa Ana Region, pursuant to Section 402(p) of the Federal Clean Water Act, and the Municipal NPDES Permit serves as a NPDES Permit under the Clean Water Act and as Waste Discharge. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: NPDES Ordinance March 16, 2005 Page 2 Requirements under California law, and the City, as a co-permittee under the Permit, is required to adopt ordinances and implement procedures with respect to that portion of the "Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System" (the "MS4") within the City, and the Municipal NPDES Permit requires the City to demonstrate that it possesses the legal authority necessary to control discharges to and from those portions of the MS4 over which it has jurisdiction, so as to comply with the Municipal NPDES Permit, and to specifically prohibit certain discharges identified in the Municipal NPDES Permit. The City has previously adopted codified and uncodified ordinances, including Ordinance No. 512, relating to the control of urban runoff, and this Chapter 19.20 of Title 19 of the City's Municipal Code will codify existing ordinances and implement regulations relating to the City's Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System. Section III of the Municipal NPDES Permit requires the City to effectively prohibit Non- Storm Water Discharges from within its boundaries into that portion of the MS4 which the City owns or operates and into watercourses, except where such discharges are: (1) in compliance with a separate individual or general NPDES permit; or (2) identified and in compliance with the Municipal NPDES Permit; or (3) originate from federal, state or other facilities which are outside the City's regulatory jurisdiction. Section VI of the Municipal NPDES Permit requires the City to demonstrate that it possesses the legal authority necessary to control discharges to and from those portions of the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System over which it has jurisdiction, so as to comply with the Municipal NPDES Permit and to specifically prohibit certain discharged identified in the Municipal NPDES Permit. The Municipal NPDES Permit contemplates the development by the Permittees of a "Municipal Storm Water Management Plan" (MSWMP), in which the City will participate, and which will, in turn, require the development and the implementation of programs for, among other things, the elimination of illicit connections and illicit discharges, development planning, development construction, and public information and education requirements, and the City implement such programs as they are developed by the Permittees. The City Attorney has reviewed and approved the revisions pertaining to the protection and regulation of the City's Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4). Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:BZ:Is Attachment ORDINANCE NO. '/~"~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 19.20 TO TITLE 19 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO THE PROTECTION AND REGULATION OF THE CITY'S MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM (MS4) (SECOND READING) WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga ("City") is a co-permittee, along with the County of San Bernardino, the San Bernardino County Flood Control District and other designated cities under the "National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit and Waste Discharge Requirements -NPDES No. CAS618036, Order No. R8-2002-0012- for the San Bernardino County Flood Control District, the County of San Bernardino County and the Incorporated Cities within the Santa Ana Region- Area-wide Urban Stormwater Runoff", dated April 26, 2002 (the "Municipal NPDES Permit"), issued by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board - Santa Ana Region, pursuant to Section 402(p) of the Federal Clean Water Act, and the Municipal NPDES Permit serves as a NPDES Permit under the Clean Water Act and as Waste Discharge Requirements under California law, and the City, as a co-permittee under the Permit, is required to adopt ordinances and implement procedures with respect to that portion of the "Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System" (the "MS4") within the City, and the Municipal NPDES Permit requires the City to demonstrate that it possesses the legal authority necessary to control discharges to and from those portions of the MS4 over which it has jurisdiction, so as to comply with the Municipal NPDES Permit, and to specifically prohibit certain discharges identified in the Municipal NPDES Permit; WHEREAS, the City has previously adopted codified and uncodified ordinances, including Ordinance No. 512, relating to the control of urban runoff, and this Chapter 19.20 of Title 19 of the City's Municipal Code will codify existing ordinances and implement regulations relating to the City's Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System; WHEREAS, Section III of the Municipal NPDES Permit requires the City to effectively prohibit Non-Storm Water Discharges from within its boundaries into that portion of the MS4 which the City owns or operates and into watercourses, except where such discharges are: (1) in compliance with a separate individual or general NPDES permit; or (2) identified and in compliance with the Municipal NPDES Permit; or (3) originate from federal, state or other facilities which are outside the City's regulatory jurisdiction; WHEREAS, Section VI of the Municipal NPDES Permit requires the City to demonstrate that it possesses the legal authority necessary to control discharges to and from those portions of the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System over which it has jurisdiction, so as to comply with the Municipal NPDES Permit and to specifically prohibit certain discharges identified in the Municipal NPDES Permit; WHEREAS, the Municipal NPDES Permit contemplates the development by the Permittees of a "Municipal Storm Water Management Plan" (MSWMP), in which the City will participate, and which will, in turn, require the development and the implementation of programs for, among other things, the elimination of illicit connections and illicit discharges, development ORDINANCE NO. March 16, 2005 Page 2 planning, development construction, and public information and education requirements, and the City implement such programs as they are developed by the Permittees; WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City to establish guidelines and procedures for control in a cost-effective manner of the quantity and quality of storm water and urban runoff to the maximum extent practicable, through the adoption of this ordinance and the consolidation and codification of its previously adopted ordinances, including Ordinance No. 512; and THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: A new Chapter 19.20 is hereby added to Title 19 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to read as follows: "CHAPTER 19.20: MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM (MS4) Article 1. Authority, Purpose and Policy, Definitions Sections: 19.20.101. Authority 19.20.102. Title, Purpose and Objectives. 19.20.103. Definitions Article 2. General Conditions and Prohibitions 19.20.201. Administration and Applicability 19.20.202. Notice 19.20.203. Connections 19.20.204. Protection of the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System 19.20.205. Prohibited Discharges 19.20.206. Exceptions to the Prohibited Discharges 19.20.207. Notification of Intent And Compliance With General Permits 19.20.208. Compliance with Best Management Practices (BMPs) 19.20.209. Spill Containment 19.20.210. Immediate Notification of Accidental Discharge 19.20.211. Written Notification of Accidental Discharge 19.20.212. Responsibility for Illegal Discharge of Prohibited Substances ORDINANCE NO. March 16, 2005 Page 3 Article 3. Residential, Commercial and Industrial Requirements 19.20.301. Maintenance of Private Residential, Commemial and Industrial Storm Drainage Systems 19.20.302. Use of Water Article 4. Industrial and Commercial Requirements 19.20. 401. Non-Storm Water Discharges 19.20. 402. General Permit for Storm Water Discharges from Industrial Activities 19.20. 403. Conditional Category - Notice of Non-Applicability 19.20. 404. Best Management Practices (BMPs) Article 5. Construction Requirements 19.20. 501. Non-Storm Water Discharges 19.20. 502. Best Management Practices 19.20. 503. General Permit for Storm Water Discharges from Construction Activity 19.20. 504. Non-Storm Water Discharge Reporting Requirements 19.20. 505. Storm Water Quality Management Plan (SWQMP) Article 6. Administrative Enforcement Remedies 19.20. 601. Authority to Inspect 19.20. 602. Notice of Correction (NOC) and Notice of Violation (NOV) 19.20. 603. Falsifying Information 19.20. 604. Administrative Civil Penalties 19.20. 605. Administrative Hearing 19.20. 606. Administrative Orders 19.20. 607. Appeals 19.20. 608. Compensation for Damages Article 7. Judicial Enforcement Remedies 19.20. 701. Violations Deemed a Public Nuisance 19.20. 702. Legal Action 19.20. 703. Civil Penalties 19.20. 704. Criminal Prosecution Article 8. General Clauses 19.20. 801. Severability 19.20. 802. Construction and Application ORDINANCE N©. March 16, 2005 Page 4 Article 1. Authority, Purpose, Policy and Definitions 19.20. 101. Authority This Chapter is enacted pursuant to the direction set forth in the Municipal NPDES Permit issued by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Aha Region, pursuant to Section 402(p) of the Clean Water Act and the California Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act. 19.20.102. Title, Purpose and Objectives This chapter shall be known as the "City of Rancho Cucamonga Storm Water and Urban Runoff Management and Discharge Control Ordinance." The intent of this Chapter is to protect and enhance the quality of watercourses, water bodies, and wetlands within the City in a manner consistent with the federal Clean Water Act, the California Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act and the Municipal NPDES Permit. This Chapter is also intended to confirm and consolidate the City's legal authority necessary to control discharges to and from those portions of the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System over which it has jurisdiction as required by the Municipal NPDES Permit, and thereby fully and timely comply with the terms of the Municipal NPDES Permit. This chapter is also intended to ensure the health, safety and general welfare of the residents of the City of Rancho Cucamonga by prescribing reasonable regulations to effectively control the non-storm water discharges containing pollutants into the. City's Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System to the maximum extent practicable and to specifically achieve the following objectives: (1) Control discharges from spills, dumping or disposal of materials other than storm water; (2) Reduce the discharge of pollutants in all storm water discharges to the maximum extent practicable; (3) Protect and enhance the water quality of local, state and federal watercourses, water bodies, ground water and wetlands in a manner pursuant to and consistent with the Clean Water Act and the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Act; (4) Establish penalties for violations of the provisions of this Chapter; 19.20.103. Definitions For the purposes of this Chapter, the following terms will be defined as set forth below. Words used in this chapter in the singular may include the plural and the plural may include the singular. Use of masculine shall also mean feminine and neuter. (1) Authorized enforcement officer shall mean the City Engineer or his or her designee. (2) Basin Plan. The "Water Quality Control Plan for the Santa Ana River Basin" (1995) adopted by the Regional Board, or any successor plan. ORDINANCE NO. March 16, 2005 Page 5 (3) Best Management Practice or BMP. Any "Best Management Practice" (as defined in 40 CFR §122.2), Best Management Guideline, or Best Management Requirement as adopted by any Federal, State, regional or local agency to prevent or reduce the pollution of Waters of the United States. "Best Management Practices" includes activities, practices, facilities, and/or procedures that when implemented to the maximum extent practicable will prevent or reduce pollutants in discharges, and any program, technology, process, siting criteria, operational methods or measures, or engineered systems, which, when implemented, prevent, control, remove, or reduce pollution. Examples of BMP's may include public education and outreach, proper planning of development projects, proper cleaning of catch basin inlets, and proper sludge or waste handling and disposal, among others. BMPs also include treatment requirements, operating procedures, and practices to control plant site runoff, spillage or leaks, sludge or waste storage and disposal, or drainage from raw material or chemical storage. (4) City. The City of Rancho Cucamonga. (5) City Engineer. The City Engineer for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or the Engineer's designee. (6) Construction Activity. Any activity used in the process of developing, redeveloping, enhancing, or maintaining land, including but not limited to: land disturbance, building construction, paving and surfacing, storage and disposal of construction related materials, including clearing, grading, or excavation that results in soil disturbance. Construction includes structure teardown. Construction activity does not include routine maintenance to maintain original line and grade, hydraulic capacity, or original purpose of facility; emergency construction activities required to immediately protect public health and safety; interior remodeling with no outside exposure of construction material or construction waste to storm water; mechanical permit work; or sign permit work. (7) Contamination. As defined in the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act (Water Code § 13050(k)), contamination is "an impairment of the quality of waters of the state by waste to a degree which creates a hazard to the public health through poisoning or through the spread of disease. 'Contamination' includes any equivalent effect resulting from the disposal of waste whether or not waters of the state are affected." (8) Control. The minimization, reduction, elimination, or prohibition by technological, legal, contractual or other means of the discharge of pollutants from an activity or activities. (9) Compliance Schedule. The time period allowed by the City for a discharger to achieve compliance with the City's storm water regulations and this Chapter. The Compliance Schedule shall contain specific dates by which adequate treatment facilities, devices, or other related equipment and/or procedures must be installed or implemented. (10) CWA. The Federal Water Pollution Control Act, also known as the Clean Water Act, as amended, 33 U.S.C. 1251, et seq. (11) Developed Parcel. Any lot or parcel of land altered from its natural state by the construction, creation, and addition of impervious area, except public streets or highways. /?/ ORDINANCE NO. March 16, 2005 Page 6 (12) Developer, A person, firm, corporation, partnership, association or other entity who proposes to develop, develops, or causes to be developed real property for himself or for others except that employees and consultants of such persons or entities, acting in such capacity, are not considered developers. (13) Dewatering. The removal and disposal of surface water or groundwater for purposes of preparing a site for construction. (14) Discharge. Any release, spill, leak, flow or escape of any liquid including sewage, wastewater or storm water, semi-solid or solid substance onto the land or into the City's MS4. (15) Discharger. Any person, property owner or occupant of a unit, building, premise or lot in the City who discharges or causes to be discharged any liquid, including sewage, waste water, storm water, non-storm water or semi-solid or solid substances directly or indirectly into the City's MS4. (16) ~:PA. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (17) Environmentally Sensitive Area ("ESA") means a designated area in which plant or animal life or their habitats are either rare or especially valuable because of their special nature or role in an ecosystem and which would be easily disturbed or degraded by human activities and developments (California Public Resources Code § 30107.5). Areas subject to storm water mitigation requirements are areas designated as "Significant Ecological Areas" by the County of San Bernardino; an area designated as a "Significant Natural Area" by the California Department of Fish and Game's Significant Natural Areas Program, provided that area has been field verified by the Department of Fish and Game; an area listed in the Basin Plan as supporting the Rare, Threatened, or Endangered Species (RARE) beneficial use; and an area identified by the City as environmentally sensitive. (18) General Construction Permit means the current version of the General Permit For Storm Water Discharges From Construction Activity issued by the State Water Resources Control Board that regulates storm water discharges associated with construction projects. (19) General Industrial Permit means the current version of the General Permit For Storm Water Discharges From Industrial Activities issued by the State Water Resources Control Board that regulates storm water discharges associated with industrial activities that are listed in 40 CFR Section 122.26 (b) (14). (20) Hearing Officer. The City Engineer, or his designee, who presides at the administrative hearings authorized by this chapter and issues final decisions on matters raised therein. (21) Illegal Discharge. Any discharge (or seepage) into the City's MS4 that is not composed entirely of storm water, except for the authorized discharges listed in Section 19.20.207 of this Chapter. Illegal discharges include the improper disposal of wastes into the MS4. Any discharge to the MS4 that is prohibited under local, state, or federal statutes, ordinances, codes, or regulations. The term illicit discharge includes all non-storm water discharges except (i) discharges pursuant to a NPDES Permit; (ii) discharges that are ORDINANCE NO. March 16, 2005 Page 7 identified in the "Discharge Limitations/Prohibitions" of the Municipal NPDES Permit; and (iii) discharges authorized by the Regional Board. (22) IllicitConnection means either of the following: (a) Any drain or conveyance, whether on the surface or subsurface, which allows an illegal discharge to enter the MS4, including but not limited to any conveyance which allows non-storm water discharges, including sewage, process wastewater and wash water to enter the MS4 and any connections to the MS4 from indoor drains and sinks, regardless of whether said drain or connection had been previously allowed, permitted or approved by a government agency; or (b) Any drain or conveyance connected to the MS4, that is not permitted pursuant to a valid NPDES Permit or which has not been documented in plans, maps or equivalent records approved by the City. (23) Maximum Extent Practicable (MEP). Refers to the maximum level of pollutant reductions or storm water runoff reductions that can be achieved to reduce the discharge of pollutants to the maximum extent practicable, as required by Section 402(p)(3)(B)(ii) of the Clean Water Act, through Best Management Practices in treatment, infiltration or a combination of treatment, infiltration and Best Management Practices. (24) Municipal NPDES Permit. The "National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit and Waste Discharge Requirements-NPDES No. CAS616036, Order No. R8-2002-0012-for the San Bemardino County Flood Control District, the County of San Bernardino County and the Incorporated Cities within the Santa Ana Region- Area- wide Urban Stormwater Runoff", dated April 26, 2002", issued by the Regional Board on April 26, 2002, and any successor permit to that permit. (25) Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System or MS4. All of the facilities involved in the operation of the storm water drainage collection and disposal system within the City, including, but not limited to, conduits, natural or artificial drains, channels and watercourses, together with appurtenances, pumping stations and equipment which is tributary to the regional storm water runoff system, and includes streets, gutters, conduits, natural or artificial drains, channels and watercourses, or other facilities that are owned, operated, maintained or controlled by the City and used for the purpose of collecting, storing, transporting, or disposing of storm water. The Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System is conveyance or system of conveyances (including roads with drainage systems, municipal streets, catch basins, curbs, gutters, ditches, natural drainage features or channels, modified natural channels, man-made channels, or storm drains): (i) owned or operated by the City; (ii) designated or used for collecting of conveying storm water; (iii) which is not a combined sewer; and (iv) which is not part of a "Publicly Owned Treatment Works" ("PO-I'VV"), as defined at 40 CFR 122.2. (26) New Development. All public and private residential (whether single family, multi-unit or planned unit development), industrial, commercial, retail, and other nonresidential construction projects, or grading for future construction, for which either a discretionary land use approval, grading permit, building permit or nonresidential plumbing permit is required. ORDINANCE NO. March 16, 2005 Page 8 (27) NPDES means the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System established under the CWA to eliminate discharges of pollution into waters of the United States. (28) NPDES Permit. Any waste discharge requirements issued by EPA, the Regional Board or the State Water Resources Control Board in the form of an NPDES Permit pursuant to Water Code {}13370 or the Clean Water Act (other than the Municipal NPDES Permit), including a General Construction Permit or a General Industrial Permit. (29) Non-Structural BMPS. Any Best Management Practices schedules of activities, prohibitions of practices, maintenance procedures, managerial practices or operational practices that aim to prevent storm water pollution by reducing the potential for contamination at the source of pollution. (30) Notice of Intent (NOI). A form provided by the State Water Resources Control Board that is required to be completed and submitted in order to obtain coverage under one of the State's NPDES General Storm Water Permits prior to the start of certain activities or construction activities. (31) Non-Storm Water. Any water discharging to the City's Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System that does not originate from precipitation events. (32) Nuisance. Any condition described by all of the following: (a) Is injurious to health, or is indecent or offensive to the senses, or an obstruction to the free use of property, so as to interfere with the comfortable enjoyment of life or property. (b) Affects at the same time an entire community or neighborhood, or any considerable number of persons, although the extent of the annoyance or damage inflicted upon individuals may be unequal. (c) Occurs during, or as a result of, the treatment or disposal of wastes. (33) Permit. Any permit issued by the City. (34) Permittee. The San Bemardino County Flood Control District; San Bernardino County; and each of the sixteen cities in San Bernardino County discharging storm water drainage into the Upper Santa Ana River Basin and regulated by the Areawide Urban Storm Water Run-Off Permit. (35) Person. Any individual, partnership, committee, entity, association, corporation, public agency, and any other organization, entity or group of persons, public or private; the masculine genders shall include the feminine, the singular shall include the plural where indicated by the context. (36) Pollutant. Any liquid, solid or semi-solid substances or combination thereof, which causes a nuisance or contributes to a condition of contamination or pollution of the storm ORDINANCE NO. March 16, 2005 Page 9 water runoff, the MS4 or the impairment or degradation of waters of the state, including but not limited to the following: (a) Floatable materials (such as floatable plastics or wood products, and metal shavings, or materials forming films, foam or scum); (b) Household waste (such as trash, cleaners, toxic or hazardous chemicals, yard wastes, animal fecal materials, used oil, coolant, gasoline and other vehicle fluids); (c) Metals and non-metals, including compounds of metals and non-metals; (d) Petroleum hydrocarbons (such as fuels, lubricants, surfactants, waste oils, solvents, coolants and grease); (e) Domestic sewage from sewer line overflows, septic tanks, porta-potties, boats and recreational vehicles; (f) Animal wastes (such as wastes from confinement facilities, kennels, pens, stables, and show facilities) (g) Substances having a pH less than 6.5 or greater than 8.5, or unusual coloration, turbidity or odor; (h) Materials causing an increase in biochemical oxygen demand, chemical oxygen demand or total organic carbon. (i) Materials containing base/neutral or acid extractable organic compounds; (j) Waste materials and wastewater generated on construction sites from construction activities (such as painting and staining; use of sealants and glues; use of lime; use of wood preservatives and solvents; disturbance of asbestos fibers, paint flakes or stucco fragments; application of oils, lubricants, vehicle maintenance, construction equipment washing, concrete pouring and cleanup; use of concrete detergents; steam cleaning or sand blasting; use of chemical degreasing or diluting agents; and chlorinated water from potable line flushing; (k) Those pollutants defined in Section 1362 (6) of the Federal Clean Water Act; and (I) Any other constituent or material, including but not limited to pesticides, herbicides, fertilizers, eroded soils, sediment and particulate materials, in quantities that have been determined by the State or EPA to adversely affect the beneficial uses of waters of the state. (37) Redevelopment. The creation or addition of impervious surfaces or the making of improvements to an existing structure on an already developed site; replacement of impervious surfaces that are not part of a routine maintenance activity; and land disturbing activities related with structural or impervious surfaces for which a discretionary land use permit or approval is required. ORDINANCE NO. March 16, 2005 Page 10 (38) Regional Board or RWQCB means the California Regional Water Quality Control Board- Santa Ana Region. (39) Sewage. The wastewater of the community derived from residential, agricultural, commercial, or industrial sources, including domestic sewage, and industrial wastewater. (40) SIC (Standard Industrial Classification). The Standard Industrial Classification is the statistical classification standard underlying all establishment-based Federal economic statistics classified by industry. The Standard is published in the SIC Manual (1987) Office of Management and Budget. (41) Storm Water. That pad of precipitation (rainfall or snow melt runoff) and associated surface runoff which travels via flow across a surface to the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System or receiving waters from impervious, semi-pervious or pervious surfaces. (42) Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). The plan as described in the General Construction Activity Storm Water Permit, as issued by the State Water Resources Control Board on August 19, 1999, and as may be amended, or the General Industrial Activities Storm Water Permit as issued on April 17, 1997, and as may be amended, which specifies BMPs that will prevent pollutants from contacting storm water and all products of erosion from moving off site into receiving waters. (43) Storm Water Quality Management Plan (SWQMP). A plan required of new development/redevelopment projects specified in this Chapter, outlining appropriate non- structural and structural BMPs, including storm water infiltration and treatment devices that will be implemented and installed to prevent pollutants from being discharged into the City's Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System, during and after construction. (44) Structural BMPs. Any structural facility designed and constructed to remove pollutants from storm water runoff or prevent pollutants from contacting storm water. Examples are canopies, structural enclosures, sediment basins, catch basin inlet filters, grassy swales, and sand and oil interceptors. (45) Urban runoff shall mean surface water flow produced by non-storm water resulting from residential, commercial, and industrial activities involving the use of potable and non- potable water. (46) Violation. A breach or violation of any prevision of this chapter. (47) Waters of the State. Any surface water or groundwater, including saline waters, within the boundaries of the state. Article 2. General Conditions and Prohibitions 19.20. 201. Administration and Applicability ORDINANCE NO. March 16, 2005 Page 11 Except as otherwise provided in this Chapter, the City Engineer shall administer, implement and enforce the provisions of this Chapter. Any powers granted to or duties imposed upon the City Engineer, may be delegated by the City Engineer to persons authorized by the City Engineer. This chapter shall apply to all dischargers, including all residents as well as commercial, industrial and construction enterprises, to the City's Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System, and to dischargers outside the City who, by agreement with the City, utilize the City's Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System. 19.20.202, Notice Unless otherwise provided herein, any notice required by this chapter shall be in writing and served in person, or by first class, registered or certified mail. Notice by mail shall be deemed to have been given at the time of deposit, postage or prepaid, in a facility regularly serviced by the United States Postal Service. 19.20. 203. Connections (a) The discharge or diversion of storm water or non-storm water is permissible when the connection to the City's MS4 is made in accordance with a valid City Permit, approved construction plan, and, if applicable, an NPDES Permit or a NOI, and the discharge is not prohibited under Section 19.20.205 of this chapter. (b) It is prohibited to establish, use, operate, maintain and/or continue any Illicit Connections to the City's MS4. This prohibition is retroactive and applies to Illicit Connections made prior to the date of enactment of this Ordinance, regardless of whether the connection was made under a permit or other authorization or whether the connection was permissible under the law or practices applicable or prevailing at the time of the connection. (c) Construction permits are required for the construction or modification of any storm drain or conveyor of drainage waters and appurtenant items within: (1) Dedicated easements, rights-of-way, or public place and/or facility. (2) Private property so as it may directly or indirectly discharge into the City's municipal separates storm sewer system. Indirect discharges include, but are not limited to, under sidewalk drains, driveway approaches, and unrestricted sheet flow. 19.20.204. Protection of the Municipal Separate Storm S~wer System No person shall construct, modify or cause to be constructed or modified any structure, facility or appurtenant items which may alter the normal functioning of the City's MS4, including any actions which may alter the capacity, fall, or structural integrity of a storm drain, channel or related structures without prior written approval of the City Engineer,, 19.20. 205. Prohibited Discharges It is prohibited to: /77 ORDINANCE NO. March 16, 2005 Page 12 (1) Discharge directly or indirectly to the City's MS4, or any street, lined or unlined drainage channel which leads to the City's MS4 any non-storm water or other solid, liquid or gaseous water unless such discharge is authorized by either a separate NPDES Permit or as otherwise specified in Section 19.20.207 of this Chapter. If such discharge is permitted by a NPDES permit, or is generally exempted, but causes a violation or potential violation any portion of the Municipal NPDES Permit for storm water discharges, such discharge is also prohibited; (2) Discharge storm water into the City's MS4 containing pollutants that have not been reduced to the maximum extent practicable; (3) Throw, deposit, leave, maintain, keep, or permit to be thrown, deposited, placed, left or maintained, any refuse, garbage, sediment or other discarded or abandoned objects, adicles, and accumulations, in or upon any street, alley sidewalk, storm drain, inlet, catch basin, conduit or other drainage structures, business place, or upon any public or private lot of land in the City, so that the same may be and/or may become a pollutant. This prohibition shall not apply to refuse, rubbish or garbage deposited in containers, bags or other appropriate receptacles which are properly placed in designated locations for regular solid waste pick up and disposal. (4) Throw or deposit any refuse, garbage or any other pollutants into any fountain, pond, lake, stream or any other body of water in a park or elsewhere within the City. (5) Discharge any of the following types of waste into the City's MS4: (a) Sewage; (b) Surface cleaning wash water resulting from mopping, rinsing, pressure washing or steam cleaning of gas stations, and vehicle service businesses or any other business; (c) Discharges resulting from the cleaning, repair, or maintenance of any type of equipment, machinery, or facility including motor vehicles, concrete mixing equipment, portable toilet servicing, etc.; (d) Wash water from mobile auto detailing and washing, steam and pressure cleaning, carpet cleaning, drapery and furniture cleaning, etc.; (e) Waste water from cleaning municipal, industrial, commercial, residential areas (including parking lots), streets, sidewalks, driveways, patios, plazas, work yards and outdoor eating or drinking areas, containing chemicals or detergents and without prior sweeping, etc.; (f) Storm water runoff from material or waste storage areas containing chemicals, fuels, grease, oil or other hazardous materials or contaminated equipment; (g) Discharges from pool or fountain water containing chlorine, biocides, acids or other chemicals; pool filter backwash containing debris and chlorine; ORDINANCE NO. March 16, 2005 Page 13 (h) Pet waste, yard waste, leaves, dirt, landscape or other debris, sediment, etc.; (i) Restaurant wastes, such as grease, mop water, and wash water from cleaning dishes, utensils, laundry, floors, floor mats, trash bins, grease containers, food waste, etc.; (j) Chemicals or chemical waste; (k) Medical wastes; (I) Blow down or bleed water from cooling towers and boilers, regenerative brine waste from water softeners or reverse osmosis treatment systems; (m) Materials or chemical substances that cause damage to the City's Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System; (n) Animal waste, soil, leaves, plant and tree cuttings, grass clippings, weeds, dead trees, fertilizer, soil amendments or mulch, and pesticides; (o) Concrete or cement waste, brick and tile work wastes, plaster and drywall tool cleanup water, waste paint or painting cleanup water, asphalt or asphalt cleanup solvents or slurry from saw cutting concrete or asphalt and other construction waste; (p) Domestic sewage including wastewater from sinks, washing machines, dishwashers, toilets, campers, motor homes or trailers; (q) Chemicals, degreasers, bleach, steam cleaning or pressure washing wastewater; (r) Motor oil, antifreeze, gasoline, diesel, kerosene, solvents, battery acid, brake fluid, transmission fluid, power steering fluid, engine cleaning compounds, engine or parts cleaning wash water or rinse water and any other vehicular fluids; (s) Water softener brine waste, or any other waste water from other household water treatment systems; (t) Waste water from draining swimming pools, ponds or fountains which contain chlorine biocides, acids or other chemicals, pool filter backwash containing debris and chlorine; (u) Discharges from acid cleaning of swimming pools, ponds or fountains or filter cleaning from the same; (v) Septic waste; or (w) Any other material that causes or contributes to a condition of contamination, nuisance or pollution in the City's Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System or causes a violation of any NPDES Permit, waste disposal regulations, waste discharge requirements, water quality standards or objectives adopted by the State Water Resources Control Board, the Regional Board, EPA, San Bernardino County ©RDINANCE NO. March 16, 2005 Page 14 Fire/Hazmat Department; the San Bernardino County Flood Control District, or any other public agency with jurisdiction. 19.20. 206. Exceptions to the Prohibited Discharges The following discharges of non-storm water into the City's storm drainage system are generally exempt from the Prohibited Discharges listed in Section 19.20.205 of this Chapter. However, items Nos. 12-22, below, have been identified as potential significant sources of pollutants and may require coverage under the Regional Board's De Minimus Permit (Order No. R8-2003-0061 [NPDES No. CAG99501], or any successor order) as well as prior approval by the City's Engineering Department, NPDES Section, before discharge (see *note below): (1) Discharges covered by NPDES permits or written clearances issued by the Regional or State Board; (2) Landscape irrigation, lawn watering, and irrigation water; (3) Water fror~ crawl space pumps; (4) Air conditioning condensation; (5) Non-commercial car washing; (6) Rising ground waters and natural springs; (7) Ground water infiltration as defined in 40 CFR 35.2005 (20) and uncontaminated pumped ground water; (8) Water flows from riparian habitats and wetlands; (9) Water flows generated from emergency response and/or fire fighting activities, however, appropriate BMPs shall be implemented to the extent practicable; BMPs must be implemented to reduce pollutants from non-emergency fire fighting flow; (10) Waters not otherwise containing wastes as defined in California Water Code Section 13050 (d), (11) Other types of discharges identified and recommended by the City and approved by the Regional Water Quality Control Board. (12) *Potable water line testing or flushing and other discharges from potable water sources; (13) *Water from fire hydrant testing and flushing using appropriate BMPs; (14) *Water from passive foundation drains or passive footing drains; (15) *Dechlorinated swimming pool discharges; (16) *Diverted stream flow; ORDINANCE NO. March 16, 2005 Page 15 (17) *Wastes associated with well installation, development, test pumping and purging; (18) *Aquifer testing wastes; (19) *Discharges from hydrostatic testing of vessels, pipelines, tanks, etc.; (20) *Discharges from the maintenance of potable water supply pipelines, tanks, reservoirs, etc.; (21 *Discharges from the disinfection of potable water supply pipelines, tanks, reservoirs, etc.; (22) *Discharges from potable water supply systems resulting from system failures, pressure releases, etc.; *Note: The City of Rancho Cucamonga requires that a "Non-Storm Water Discharge Notification Form" be submitted to the Engineering Department for approval of these discharges, five days prior to any planned discharges or, as soon as possible, for any unplanned discharges. The Notification Form is available from the Engineering Department counter. Monitoring may also be required for these discharges.. The Regional Board may issue Waste Discharge Requirements for discharges exempted from NPDES requirements, if identified to be a significant source of pollutants. The Executive Officer of the Board may also add categories of non-storm water discharges that are not significant sources of pollutants or remove categories of non-storm water discharges listed above based upon a finding that the discharges are a significant source of pollutants. In this case, the list of exempted discharges, above, would be adjusted accordingly. 19.20.207. Notification of Intent And Compliance With General Permits (a) Each industrial discharger, discharger associated with construction activity, or other discharger, described in any general storm water permit addressing such discharges, including but not limited to the General Construction Permit and the General Industrial Permit, as may be adopted by the EPA, the State Water Resources Control Board, or the RWQCB, shall provide a NOI, comply with and undertake all other activities required by any such general NPDES storm water permit applicable to such discharges. (b) Each discharger identified in an individual NPDES permit or discharge order relating to storm water discharges shall comply with and undertake ali other activities required by such permit or order. 19.20.208. Compliance with Best Management Practices (BMPs) Any person undertaking any activity or operation in the City that could potentially cause or contribute to storm water pollution or a discharge of non-storm water to the City's MS4 shall comply with all applicable Best Management Practices (BMPs) as listed in the California Storm Water Best Management Practice Handbooks or the current, San Bernardino County Storm Water Program's "Report of Waste Discharge", to reduce pollutants in storm water runoff and ORDINANCE NO. March 16, 2005 Page 16 reduce non-storm water discharges to the City's MS4 to the maximum extent practicable or to the extent required by law. 19.20. 209. Spill Containment (a) Persons storing chemicals or chemical waste outdoors shall be required to install spill containment subject to requirements established by the City Engineer and in accordance with applicable Federal, State, Regional Board and San Bernardino County standards. Persons storing any other materials or equipment that are potential sources of storm water pollution are also required to install spill containment. (b) No person shall operate a spill containment system that could allow incompatible materials and/or wastes to mix, thereby creating hazardous or toxic substances in the event of failure of one or more containers. (c) Spill containment systems shall consist of a system of dikes, walls, barriers, berms and/or other devices a Structural BMP's designed to contain the spillage of the liquid contents of the containers stored in them and to minimize the buildup of storm water from precipitation, and run-on from roof drainage and outside areas. If the spill containment system does not have a roof which covers the entire contained area, the spill containment system shall have the capacity to contain precipitation from at least a 24 hour, 25 year rainfall event plus ten (10) percent of the total volume of the material stored there or the volume of the largest container, whichever is greater. Spill containment systems shall also be constructed of impermeable and non-reactive materials to the materials and/or wastes being contained. (d) Spilled and/or leaked materials and/or wastes and any accumulated precipitation shall be removed from the spill containment system in as timely a manner as is necessary to prevent the overflow of the spill containment system. (e) Unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer, all chemicals or wastes discharged within the spill containment system shall be disposed of in accordance with all applicable Federal, State, and local rules, regulations, and laws, and shall not be discharged into the City's sanitary sewer system, Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System or onto the ground. 19.20.210. Immediate Notification of Accidental Discharge (a) Protection of the City's Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System from the accidental discharge of prohibited materials or wastes is the responsibility of the person or persons in charge of such material. Detailed plans showing facilities and operating procedures to provide this protection shall be submitted to the City for review, and shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to any construction. All new and existing dischargers shall complete such a plan. Review and approval of such plans and operating procedures shall not relieve the discharger from the responsibility to modify his or her facility as necessary to meet the requirements of this chapter. (b) A notice shall be permanently posted in a prominent place advising employees whom to contact in the event of an accidental discharge. Employers shall ensure that all employees are advised of the emergency notification procedures. In the event of an accidental QRDINANCE NO. March 16, 2005 Page 17 discharge, it is the responsibility of the discharger to immediately telephone and notify the proper authorities. (c) Alt accidental discharges of pollutants into the City's Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System, including a street or gutter, sha~l be immediately reported to the City's Engineering Department and Fire Depadment. All discharges that pose a threat to human health or the environment shall be reported to the Executive Officer of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board within 24 hours by telephone or e-mail and followed with a written report of the spill event within 5 days. At minimum, all sewage spills over 1,000 gallons and all reportable quantities of hazardous materials or hazardous waste shall be reported within 24 hours. 19.20. 211. Written Notification of Accidental Discharge (a) Within five (5) working days following an accidental discharge of pollutants into the City's Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System, the person or persons responsible for the discharge of the material and/or waste, which was accidentally discharged, shall submit a written report to the City Engineer. The report shall describe in detail the type and volume of the material and/or waste and the cause of the discharge. The report shall also describe in detail all corrective actions taken and measures to be taken to prevent future occurrences. (b) Such notification of the accidental discharge shall not relieve the user of any fines or civil penalties incurred as a result of the event or any other liability, which may be imposed, by this chapter or other applicable laws. 19.20.212. Responsibility for Illegal Discharge of Prohibited Substances The property owner(s) of a lot or parcel from which an illegal discharge originates shall be ultimately responsible for all abatement and cleanup costs associated with the discharge, at his own expense, if the responsible party cannot be located. Likewise, if the tenant of a multi-family residential unit has discharged a prohibited material or waste into the City's storm drainage system or has caused the contamination of storm water runoff from the property by his activities and the City Engineer cannot determine the responsible party or residential unit responsible, the owner of the property from which the discharge originated, shall be responsible for the cleanup and abatement costs to mitigate the condition. Additionally, a property owner will be responsible for all cleanup costs and damages to the City's storm drainage system from a contractor's activities, if the contractor was hired by the owner and cannot be located. Article 3. Residential, Commercial and Industrial Requirements 19.20. 301. Maintenance of Private Residential, Commercial and Industrial Storm Drainage Systems All private residential, commercial, and industrial storm drainage inlets, underdrains and gutters shall be inspected at least annually and cleaned prior to the beginning of the rainy season if there is evidence of one or more of the following conditions: (1) The sedimentJdebris storage volume is 25 percent or more full; (2) There is evidence of illegal discharge; ORDINANCE NO. March 16, 2005 Page 18 (3) Accumulated sediment or debris impairs the hydraulic function of the facility. Private streets shall also be swept and maintained as needed to prevent sediment, gardening waste, trash, litter and other contaminants from entering the City's storm drainage system. 19.20. 302. Use of Water To the maximum extent practicable, runoff of water used for irrigation purposes and from lawn watering shall be minimized to the maximum extent practicable. Runoff of water from the permitted washing down of paved areas shall be minimized to the maximum extent practicable. Article 4. Industrial and Commercial Requirements 19.20.401. Non-Storm Water Discharges All non-storm water discharges associated with industrial and commercial activities that discharge into the City's Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System are prohibited except as permitted by an individual user's NPDES Permit, a NOI or Section 19.20. 206 of this Chapter. 19.20.402. General Permit for Storm Water Discharges from Industrial Activities (a) All businesses who own or operate facilities described in 40 CFR 122.26(b)(14)(i)-(xi) are required to obtain coverage under the State's General Industrial Permit, at least fourteen (14) days prior to the commencement of activities that may involve discharges to the MS4. All listed businesses are required to submit a completed Notice of Intent (NOI) form, site map and application fee to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). Such businesses shall prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), retain a copy of the SWPPP on site and comply with all the requirements of the General Industrial Permit. (Copies of the NOI form are available from the City's Engineer. (b) The City requires that all businesses that have filed an NOI for coverage under the State's General Industrial Permit and have received a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID) from the State Water Resources Control Board, either mail, FAX or hand deliver a copy of the WDID letter from the State to the City Engineer as proof of filing. 19.20. 403. Conditional Category - Notice of Non-Applicability (a) To the extent permissible under state and federal law, businesses which own or operate facilities described in 40 CFR 122.26(b)(14)(xi) may prepare a "Notice Of Non-Applicability" in lieu of an NOI if they are able to certify on the form provided by the State Water Resources Control Board that there is no manufacturing process, material, equipment or product storage outside in an area that is exposed to storm water runoff. The "Notice of Non-Applicability" must document all of the following: (1) All prohibited non-storm water discharges have been eliminated or otherwise permitted; ORDINANCE NO. March 16, 2005 Page 19 (2) All significant materials related to industrial activity (including waste materials) are not exposed to storm water or authorized non-storm water discharges; (3) All industrial activities and industrial equipment are not exposed to storm water or authorized non-storm water discharges; (4) There is no exposure of storm water to significant materials associated with industrial activity through other direct or indirect pathways such as from industrial activities that generate dust and particulates. (b) Businesses in this category are required to submit the Notice of Non-Applicability to the local office of the Regional Board and are required to maintain the above documentation on-site at all times. They are also required to re-evaluate and re-certify once a year that the conditions above are continuously met. Copies of the "Notice of Non-Applicability" form are available from the City Engineer. 19.20. 404. Best Management Practices (BMPs) (a) All businesses, regardless of permit status, shall implement all applicable BMPs, as listed in the California Storm Water Best Management Practice Handbooks or the current San Bernardino County Municipal Storm Water Management Program, to reduce pollutants in storm water runoff and reduce non-storm water discharges to the MS4 to the maximum extent practicable. All structural controls and BMP's shall also be maintained to effectively prevent pollutants from contacting storm water or remove pollutants from storm water runoff to the maximum extent practicable. Maintenance records for structural BMP's and treatment devices, including waste hauling receipts shall be kept for a period of five (5) years and made available to the City's inspector, upon request. (1) If structural or treatment controls or BMP's are not functioning as designed or are not effective in reducing storm water pollutants or non-storm water discharges to the maximum extent practicable, the City will require that the control device or BMP be repaired, rebuilt or replaced. (2) Storage of Materials, Machinery, and Equipment: No person shall place machinery or equipment that is to be repaired or maintained in areas susceptible to or exposed to storm water, in a manner that leaks, spills and other maintenance-related pollutants are discharged to the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System. (3) Food Wastes: Food wastes generated by non-residential 'food service and food distribution sources shall be properly disposed of and in a manner so such wastes are not discharged to the MS4. (4) Best Management Practices: Best Management Practices shall be used in areas exposed to storm water for the removal and lawful disposal of all fuels, chemicals, fuel and chemical wastes, animal wastes, garbage, batteries, or other materials which have potential adverse impacts on water quality. ORDINANCE NO. March 16, 2005 Page 20 Article 5. Construction Requirements 19.20.501. Non-Storm Water Discharges Discharges of non-storm water from construction activities are prohibited except for those discharges listed in Section 19.20.207 of this Chapter or any discharges authorized by the City Engineer or the RWQCB. The City and the RWQCB will allow the discharge of certain non- storm water discharges from construction sites provided that they are in compliance with the discharge limitations specified in the current General Waste Discharge Requirements for De Minimus Discharges (Order No. 128-2003-0061 or any applicable successor order) issued by the Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region. The following discharges are authorized provided they are in compliance with the Permit: (1) Construction dewatering wastes; (2) Wastes associated with well installation, development, test pumping and purging; (3) Aquifer testing wastes; (4) Dewatering wastes from subterranean seepage, except for discharges from utility company vaults; (5) Discharges resulting from hydrostatic testing of vessels, pipelines, tanks, etc.; (6) Discharges resulting from the maintenance of potable water supply pipelines, tanks, reservoirs, etc.; (7) Discharges resulting from the disinfection of potable water supply pipelines, tanks, reservoirs, etc.; (8) Discharges from potable water supply systems resulting from system failures, pressure releases, etc.; (9) Discharges from fire hydrant testing or flushing; 19.20, 502. Best Management Practices All construction projects which could potentially have an adverse impact on the City's Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System or waters of the state shall install and/or implement appropriate construction and post-construction BMPs, as listed in their SWQMP or the "California Storm Water Best Management Practice Handbook", to reduce pollutants to the maximum extent practicable or to the extent required by law. ORDINANCE NO. March 16, 2005 Page 21 19.20.503. General Permit for Storm Water Discharges from Construction Activity (a) Any developer/owner engaging in construction activities, which disturb five acres or more of land, shall apply for. coverage under the General Storm Water Permit for Construction Activity with the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). Any developer/owner engaging in construction activities, which disturb less than five acres but are part of a larger common plan of development or sale that is greater than five acres must also apply for coverage under the General Storm Water Permit for Construction Activity with the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). The owner of the land where the construction activity is occurring is responsible for obtaining coverage under the permit. Owners may obtain coverage under the General Permit by completing a "Notice of Intent" form (NOI) and mailing the form along with a vicinity map and the appropriate fee to the office of the California State Water Resources Control Board. The NOI form and checklist of items to submit to the state is available from the State Water Resources Control Board in : Sacramento, California or from the City's Engineering Department, Environmental section. In addition, the owner shall also prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) in accordance with state requirements. (b) Prior to obtaining any City-issued grading and/or construction permits the developedowner shall provide evidence of compliance with the General Construction Permit by providing a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number (VVDID) to the City's Engineering Department. 19.20. 504. Non-Storm Water Discharge Reporting Requirements Authorized non-storm water discharges under Section 19.20.503 shall be reported to the City Engineer at least five (5) days prior to a planned discharge. Unplanned discharges of non- storm water into the City's storm drainage system shall be reported as soon as possible and before any discharge is initiated. The City's Engineering Department, Environmental Section will provide a "Non-Storm Water Discharge Notification Form" for any developer that is proposing to discharge any non-storm water from a construction site. The Non-Storm Water Discharge Notification Form must be submitted to the Engineering Department, Environmental Section, for these discharges, at least five days prior to any planned discharge or as soon as possible for any unplanned discharge. Monitoring may also be required for these discharges. If the City provided form is not utilized, a report shall be submitted prior to discharge, which includes the following information: (1) Type of proposed discharge; (2) Estimated average and maximum daily flow rate; (3) Frequency and duration of discharge; (4) A description of the proposed treatment system (if appropriate); (5) A description of the path from the point of discharge to the nearest storm drain inlet. A~I discharges shall be monitored daily for flow volume and shall be recorded in a daily log by the person responsible for the discharge. Discharges shall also be sampled during the first ORDINANCE NO. March 16, 2005 Page 22 thirty (30) minutes of each discharge and weekly thereafter for continuous discharges for chlorine and total suspended solids. Monitoring data for flow, chlorine and suspended solids and any other required constituents shall be reported to the City's Engineering Department, Environmental section on a weekly basis. 19.20.505. Storm Water Quality Management Plan (SWQMP) Prior to the issuance of any grading or building permit, all qualifying land developmentJredevelopment projects, shall submit and have approved a Storm Water Quality Management Plan (SWQMP) to the City Engineer on a form provided by the City. The SWQMP shall identify all BMPs that will be incorporated into the project to control storm water and non-storm water pollutants during and after construction and shall be revised as necessary during the life of the project. The SWQMP submittal applies to construction projects covered by the NPDES General Construction Permit as well as construction projects less than five acres. · Qualifying development/redevelopment projects include: (1) Home subdivisions of 10 units or more. This includes single family residences, multi- family residences, condominiums, apartments, etc.; (2) Industrial/Commercial developments of 100,000 square feet or more. This includes non- residential developments such as hospitals, educational institutions, recreational facilities, mini-malls, hotels, office buildings, warehouses, and light industrial facilities; (3) Vehicle maintenance and automotive repair shops (SIC codes 5013, 5014, 5541, 7532- 7534, 7536-7539); (4) Food Service businesses where the land area of the development is 5,000 square feet or more; (5) All hillside developments on 10,000 square feet or more, which are located on areas with known erosive soil conditions or where the natural slope is twenty-five percent or more; (6) Developments of 2,500 square feet of impervious surface or more adjacent to (within 200 feet) or discharging directly into Environmentally Sensitive Areas such as areas designated in the Ocean Plan as areas of special biological significance or water bodies listed on the CWA Section 303(d) list of impaired waters; (7) Parking lots of 5,000 square feet or more exposed to storm water. Parking lot is defined as land area or facility for the temporary storage of motor vehicles; (8) All significant re-development projects adding 5,000 square feet or more of impervious surface on an already developed site. This includes additional buildings and/or structures, extension of an already existing building footprint and construction of parking lots, etc. ORDINANCE NO. March 16, 2005 Page 23 Article 6. Administrative Enforcement Remedies 19.20, 601 Authority to inspect (a) The City Engineer, or the City Engineer's designated representative, shall be authorized, at any reasonable time, to enter the premises or Developed Parcel of any discharger to the City's Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System to determine compliance with the provisions of this chapter, and to: (1) Conduct inspection, monitoring, and/or other authorized duties to enforce the provisions of this chapter; (2) Review any records, reports, test results or other information required to enforce the provisions of this chapter. Such review may include the necessity to photograph, videotape, or copy any applicable information; and (3) Inspect any chemicals, materials, wastes, storage areas, storage containers, and waste generating processes, treatment facilities, and discharge locations. Such inspection may incJude the necessity to photograph or videotape any applicable chemicals, materials, wastes, storage areas, storage containers, and waste generating processes, treatment facilities, and discharge locations. (b) The City Engineer or his designated representative shall provide adequate identification when entering the premises of any discharger. If such entry is refused or cannot be obtained, the City Engineer shall have recourse to every remedy provided by law to secure lawful entry and inspection of the premises. (c) If the City Engineer has reasonable cause to believe that non-storm water discharge conditions on or emanating from the premises are of a nature so as to require immediate inspection to safeguard public health or safety, the City Engineer shall have the right to immediately enter and inspect said property and may use any reasonable means required to effect such entry and make such inspection, regardless if said property is occupied or unoccupied and regardless if formal permission to inspect said property has been obtained. (d) Where a discharger has instituted security measures requiring proper identification and clearance before entry onto the premises, the discharger shall make all necessary arrangements with its security agents in order that, upon presentation of such identification, the City Engineer or his designated representative(s) shall be permitted to enter the premises without delay, for the purpose of performing their authorized duties. For facilities, which require special clearances to conduct inspections, it shall be the responsibility of the discharger to obtain all necessary clearances on behalf of the City so that the inspection is not impaired. 19.20. 602. Notice of Correction (NOC) and Notice of Violation (NOV) (a) Notice of Correction (NOC) ORDINANCE NO. March 16, 2005 Page 24 Whenever the City Engineer or his designated representative finds that any person threatens to violate or has already violated any prohibition, limitation or requirement contained in this chapter, any NPDES Permit or the Basin Plan, the City may serve upon such person a written Notice of Correction stating the nature of the violation and the necessary actions that must be implemented to correct the situation. The NOC shall stipulate a time period by which the problem must be corrected and the penalties for non-compliance. (b) Notice of Violation (NOV) (1) When the City Engineer or his designated representative finds that any person has failed to comply with a Notice of Correction or has violated or continues to violate any prohibition, limitation or requirement contained in this chapter, any NPDES Permit or the Basin Plan, the City may serve upon such person a written Notice of Violation stating the nature of the violation and the penalties for non-compliance. At a minimum, the Notice of Violation shall require that the person to submit to the City Engineer, within a time period specified in the notice, a plan indicating the cause of the violation and corrective actions which will be taken to prevent recurrence. (2) A discharger shall be guilty of a separate offense for every day during any portion of which any violation of any provision of this chapter is committed, continued, or permitted by the 'discharger. (3) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 53069.4 and 36900.(b) the following violation assessments will apply to the issuance of a Notice of Violation by the City Engineer or his authorized representative: (i) A First Notice of Violation shall be issued for a first violation of this chapter and shall be punishable by a fine not exceeding one hundred dollars ($100.00); (ii) A Second Notice of Violation shall be issued for a second violation of this same ordinance within one year and shall be punishable by a fine not exceeding two hundred dollars ($200.00); (iii) A Third Notice of Violation shall be issued for a third violation of this same ordinance within one year and shall be punishable by a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars ($500.00). Each additional violation of the same ordinance within one year shall also be punishable by a fine of $500.00. ORDINANCE NO. March 16, 2005 Page 25 19.20. 603. Falsifying Information Any person who knowingly makes any false statement, representation, record, report, plan or other document filed with the City, or who falsifies, tampers with or knowingly renders inaccurate monitoring devices or methods required under this Chapter, shall have violated this Chapter and shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. 19.20. 604. Administrative Civil Penalties (a) Pursuant to California Government Code §54739 and §54740.5, the City Engineer may issue an administrative complaint to any person who violates this chapter, any prohibition or limitation thereof or any compliance order, cease and desist order, stop work order or injunction. The administrative complaint shall allege the act or failure to act that constitutes the violation, the proposed civil penalty, and the authority under which it is imposed. (b) The Administrative Complaint, served on the alleged violator by personal delivery or by certified mail, shall inform the person served that a hearing before the City Engineer shall be conducted within sixty (60) days of the service of the complaint. The right to a hearing may be waived by the person who has been issued the administrative complaint, in which case the City shall not conduct a hearing. A person dissatisfied with the decision of the City Engineer may appeal to the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga within thirty (30) days of not[ce of the Engineer's decision. (c) If after the hearing, or appeal, if any, it is found that the person has violated reporting or discharge requirements, the City Engineer or City Council may assess a civil penalty against that person. In determining the amount of the civil penalty, the City Engineer or City Council may take into consideration all relevant circumstances, including, but not limited to, the extent of harm caused by the violation, the economic benefit derived through any noncompliance, the nature and persistence of the violation, the length of time over which the violation occurs and corrective action, if any, attempted or taken by the discharger. (d) Civil penalties may be assessed, as follows: (1) In an amount which shall not exceed three thousand dollars ($3,000) for each day for failing or refusing to timely comply with any compliance order established by the City; (2) In an amount which shall not exceed five thousand dollars ($5,000) per violation for each day of discharge in violation of any discharge limitation, areawide urban runoff permit condition, or requirement issued, reissued or adopted by the City; (3) In an amount which shall not exceed ten dollars ($10) per gallon for discharges in violation of any stop work order, cease and desist order or other orders, or prohibition issued, reissued, or adopted by the City. (4) The amount of any civil penalties imposed under this section which have remained delinquent for a period of 60 days shall constitute a lien against the real property of the discharger from which the discharge originated resulting in the imposition of the civil penalty. The lien provided herein shall have no force and effect until recorded with the San Bernardino County recorder and when recorded shall have the force ORDINANCE NO. March 16, 2005 Page 26 and effect and priority of a judgment lien and continue for 10 years.from the time of recording unless sooner released, and shall be renewable in accordance with the provisions of Sections 683.110 to 683.220, inclusive, of the California Code of Civil Procedure. All monies collected under this section may be deposited in a special account by the City and to be made available for the monitoring, treatment, and control of discharges into the City's storm drainage system or for other mitigation measures. (e) Unless appealed, an order imposing administrative civil penalties shall become effective and final upon issuance thereof, and payment shall become due within thirty (30) days of issuance of an invoice by the City. Copies of these orders shall be served by personal service or by registered mail upon the party served with the administrative complaint and upon other persons who appeared at the hearing and requested a copy. (f) The City may, at its option, elect to petition the superior court to confirm any order establishing civil penalties and enter judgment in conformity therewith in accordance with the provisions of Sections 1285 to 1287.6, inclusive, of the California Code of Civil Procedure. 19.20. 605. Administrative Hearing (a) Any person who receives a notice of correction, notice of violation, administrative order, or other notice specified in this chapter may request, or the City Engineer may order, an administrative hearing, at which time, a person who causes or allows, or who has caused or allowed, an unauthorized discharge to enter into the City's Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System or who continues to allow a violation of this chapter to exist, may show cause why a proposed enfomement action should not be taken against him. The City Manager, or the City Manager's designee, shall preside over the administrative hearing, at which time each party, including the discharger and the City Engineer or his designee, shall have the right to present evidence. (b) A Notice of Hearing shall be served on the discharger specifying the time and place of the hearing and referencing the specific violation and/or violations of this chapter, the reasons why the action is to be taken and the proposed enforcement action, directing the discharger to show cause before the Hearing Officer why the proposed enforcement action should not be taken. The Notice of Hearing shall be served personally or by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested at least ten (10) working days prior to the hearing. Service of the Notice of Hearing may be made on any agent or officer of the discharger. ORDINANCE NO. March 16, 2005 Page 27 19.20. 606. Administrative Orders The City Engineer may require compliance with any prohibition, limitation or requirement contained in this chapter, any NPDES storm water permit or the Basin Plan, by issuing an Administrative Order, enforceable in a court of law or by directly seeking court action. Administrative orders may include Compliance Orders, Stop Work Orders, Cease and Desist Orders, Termination of Service Orders and Immediate Termination of Service Orders. (a) Compliance Orders - The City Engineer or his designee may issue a Compliance Order to any person who fails to correct a violation of this chapter, any NPDES storm water permit or the Basin Plan. The Order shall be in writing, specify the violation(s) and require appropriate compliance measures within a specified time period. The Compliance Order may include the following terms and requirements. (1) Specific steps and time schedules for compliance as reasonably necessary to eliminate an existing prohibited discharge or illegal connection or to prevent the imminent threat of a prohibited discharge; (2) Specific requirements for containment, cleanup, removal, storage, installation of overhead covering or proper disposal of any pollutant having the potential to contact storm water runoff; (3) Installation of stormwater treatment devices, containment structures, wash racks and addition and removal of stormwater drains; (4) Any other terms or requirements reasonably calculated to prevent imminent threat of or continuing violations of this chapter, including, but not limited to requirements for compliance with Best Management Practices guidance documents promulgated by any federal, state or regional agency. (5) The City Engineer or his designee may adopt a proposed compliance schedule submitted by the user or may adopt a revised compliance schedule if in his judgment, the proposed compliance schedule would allow the user to cause harm to the receiving waters and/or the City's MS4. (6) A Compliance Order shall require the person to pay a one thousand dollar ($1000.00) penalty fee to the City for the issuance thereof. (b) Stop Work Order - The City Engineer or Building Official may serve a written Stop Work Order on any person engaged in doing or causing to be done, new construction, tenant improvements, alterations or additions, if: (1) No construction permit has been granted by the City; (2) Work has begun prior to the submittal of a written Storm Water Quality Management Plan (SWQMP) and subsequent approval by the City Engineer or his designee; or, ORDINANCE NO. March 16, 2005 Page 28 (3) Violations of this chapter are found at the site of the new construction, tenant improvements, alterations or additions. Any person served a Stop Work Order shall stop such work forthwith until written authorization to continue is received from the City Engineer or Building Official. A Stop Work Order shall require the discharger to pay a one thousand dollar ($1000.00) penalty fee to the City for the issuance thereof. (c) Cease and Desist Order ~- When the City Engineer or his designee finds that any person or industrial and/or commercial discharger has violated or threatens to violate any prohibition, limitation or requirement contained in this chapter, any NPDES storm water permit or the Basin Plan, or NPDES Storm Water Permit, the City may issue a Cease and Desist Order directing such person to: (1) Immediately discontinue any illicit connection or prohibited discharge to the City's Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System; (2) Immediately contain or divert any flow of water off the property, where the flow is occurring in violation of any provision of this chapter; (3) Immediately discontinue any other violation of this chapter. A Cease and Desist Order shall require the discharger to pay a one thousand dollar ($1000.00) penalty fee to the City for the issuance thereof. (d) Termination of Service - When the City Engineer finds any person or industrial and/or commercial discharger, who has a direct connection into the City's Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System or has violated an Administrative Order, the City Engineer may terminate storm drain service to the discharger. The person shall be liable for all costs for termination of storm drain service incurred by the City. This provision is in addition to any other statues, rules or regulations authorizing termination of service for delinquency payment or for any other reasons. Storm drain service shall be re-instituted by the City Engineer after the discharger has complied with all the provisions of the Administrative Order. The person shall also be liable for all costs for re-instituting storm drain service. (e) Immediate Termination of Service - The City Engineer may immediately suspend storm drain service and any non-storm water discharge permit when such suspension is necessary, in the opinion of the City Engineer, to stop an actual or threatened discharge which presents or may present an imminent or substantial endangerment to the health or welfare of persons or the environment, or which significantly or could significantly cause pollution to the receiving waters, ground and/or storm drainage system of the City. Any person or industrial and/or commercial discharger notified that their storm drain service has been suspended shall immediately cease and eliminate the discharge into the City Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System. In the event of failure to comply voluntarily with the Termination of Service Order, the City Engineer shall take appropriate steps, including immediate severance of all applicable storm drain connections. All persons responsible for a discharge that may endanger the health or welfare of the community or the environment shall be liable for a~l ORDINANCE NO. March 16, 2005 Page 29 costs incurred by the City in terminating storm drain service. Storm drain service shall be re-instituted by the City Engineer after the actual or threatened discharge has been eliminated. A detailed written statement, submitted by the industrial and/or commercial discharger, describing the cause of the harmful contribution and the measures to prevent any future occurrence, shall be submitted to the City Engineer within ten (10) working days of the date of storm drain service termination. 19,20. 607. Appeals Any decision of the City Engineer may be appealed to the City Manager. An appeal must be initiated within ten (10) working days after receipt of the notice of any decision or action by filing, with the City Engineer, a letter of appeal briefly stating therein the basis for such appeal. The hearing on appeal shall be held on a date no more than fifteen (15) working days after receipt of the letter of appeal. The appellant shall be given at least five (5) working days notice of the time and place of the hearing. The City Manager, or the City Manager's designee, shall provide the appellant and any other interested pady the reasonable opportunity to be heard and in order to show cause why the determination of City Engineer should not be upheld. Within forty-five (45) working days of the hearing, the City Manager, or the City Manager's designee, shall make a written decision regarding the appeal. The decision of the City Manager, or the City Manager's designee, shall be final. The imposition of fines or penalties shall be stayed during the appeal period unless the City Engineer determines that such a stay would threaten the public safety, health or welfare. 19.20. 608, Compensation for Damages Any person who damages monitoring equipment, has the potential to affect or affects human health or the environment, discharges pollutants into the City's storm drainage system which causes or has the potential to cause increased maintenance of the system, non-routine inspection or sampling of the system, system blockages or other damage or interference in the City's Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System, or causes any other damages, including the imposition of fines or penalties on the City by Federal, State or local regulatory agencies, shall be liable to the City for all damages and additional costs, including fines and penalties. An administrative fee, which shall be fixed by the City Manager based on the City's current overhead cost allocation percentage, shall be added to these charges and shall be payable to the City within thirty (30) calendar days of invoicing. Article 7. Judicial Enforcement Remedies 19.20.701. Violations Deemed a Public Nuisance In addition to the penalties established by this Chapter, any threat to public health, safety or welfare shall be declared and deemed a public nuisance. Any condition caused or permitted to exist in violation of any of the provisions of this Chapter is hereby determined to be a threat to the public health, safety and welfare, is declared and deemed a public nuisance. Such public nuisance may be summarily abated and/or remedied by the City Engineer, and/or civil action to abate, enjoin or otherwise compel the cessation of such nuisance may be taken by the City Attorney. ORDINANCE NO. March 16, 2005 Page 30 (a) The cost of such abatement, remediation and/or restoration shall be borne by the owner, lessee or tenant of the property causing the violation. The cost thereof shall be a lien upon and against the property and such lien shall continue in existence until the same shall be paid. The cost of such abatement and restoration shall be borne by the owner of the property and the cost thereof shall be billed to the owner of the property, as provided by law or ordinance for the recovery of nuisance abatement costs. (b) The City Engineer may assess the violator for the costs of any investigation, inspection, or monitoring survey which led to the establishment of the violation, and for the reasonable costs of preparing and bringing legal action under this subsection. (c) The City Engineer may assess the violator for costs incurred in removing, correcting, or terminating the adverse effects resulting from violation. (d) The City Engineer may assess the violator for compensatory damages for loss or destruction to water quality, wildlife, fish and aquatic life. (e) If any violation of this Chapter constitutes a seasonal and recurrent nuisance, the City Engineer shall so declare. The failure of any person to take appropriate annual precautions to prevent storm water pollution after written notice of a determination under this paragraph shall constitute a public nuisance and a violation of this Chapter. (f) Causing, permitting, aiding, abetting, or concealing a violation of any provision of this Chapter shall constitute a violation of such provision. '19.20. 702. Legal Action (a) The City Attorney may commence an action for appropriate legal, equitable or injunctive relief in the Municipal or Superior Court of San Bernardino County against any person who has violated or continues to violate any provision of this chapter, the Basin Plan, federal or state discharge standards or permit conditions, or who violates the requirements of any Administrative Order. (b) In addition to the penalties provided in this chapter, the City Engineer may recover all reasonable attorney fees, court costs, court reporter's fees, expenses of litigation by appropriate suit of law against the person(s) found to have violated any provision of this chapter or the orders, rules, regulations and permits issued thereunder and other expenses associated with enforcement activities, including sampling and monitoring expenses, and the cost of any actual damages incurred by the City. (c) To the extent the City makes a provision of this Chapter or any identified BMP a condition of approval to the issuance of a permit or license, any person in violation of such condition is subject to the permit revocation procedures set forth in this Code. (d) Remedies under this Section are in addition to and do not supersede or limit any and all other available remedies, civil or criminal. The remedies provided for herein shall be cumulative and not exclusive. ORDINANCE NO. March 16, 2005 Page 31 19.20.703. Civil Penalties (a) Persons who continue to violate any provision of this chapter shall be liable to the City for a maximum civil penalty of twenty five thousand dollars ($25,000) but not less than three thousand dollars ($3,000.00) per violation per day. In the case of a monthly or other long-term average discharge limit, penalties shall accrue for each day during the period of the violation. (b) In determining the amount of civil liability, the Court shall take into account all relevant circumstances, including, but not limited to, the extent of harm caused by the violation, the magnitude and duration of the violation, any economic benefit gained through the discharger's violation, corrective actions by the discharger, the compliance history of the discharger, and any factor as justice requires. (c) Filing a suit for civil penalties shall not be a bar against, or a prerequisite for taking any other action against a discharger. The City may institute further legal action to collect such penalties in the event that the violator of this chapter fails or refuses to pay said penalty within thirty (30) days from the date that it has been assessed. 19.20. 704. Criminal Prosecution (a) Any person who willfully or negligently violates any provision of this chapter or permit conditions, or who violates any Administrative Order or any other provision of this chapter is guilty of a misdemeanor, which, upon conviction, is punishable by a fine of not less than three thousand dollars ($3,000.00) and/or by imprisonment for a period of not more than six (6) months. Each such pemon shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for every day during any portion of which any violation of any provisions of this chapter is committed, continued or permitted by such discharger, and shall be punishable therefore as provided by this section. (b) Any person who knowingly makes any false statements, representations, or certifications in any application, record, report, plan, or other documentation filed, or required to be maintained, pursuant to this chapter, storm water permit, or order issued hereunder, or who falsifies, tampers with, or knowingly renders inaccurate any monitoring device or method required under this ordinance shall, upon conviction, be punished by a fine of not less than three thousand dollars ($3,000.00) per day of violation or by imprisonment or by both. Article 8. General Clauses 19.20. 801. Severability If any provisions, paragraph, word, section, subsection or article of this Chapter is invalidated by any court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions, paragraph, words, sections, and other chapters, shall not be affected and shall continue in full force and effect. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance and each and every section, subsection, sentence, clause, portion, or phrase without regard to whether any other section, subsection, sentence, clause, portion, or phrase of the Ordinance would be subsequently declared invalid or unconstitutional. 19.20.802. Construction and Application. ORDINANCE NO. March 16, 2005 Page 32 This Chapter shall be construed to assure consistency with the requirements of the federal Clean Water Act and acts amendatory thereof or supplementary thereto, applicable implementing regulations, and the Municipal NPDES Permit, and any amendment, revision or reissuance thereof. SECTION 2: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published in the manner prescribed by law. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS __ DAY OF ., 2005, MAYOR I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the __ day of ,2005, and was finally passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of ,2005, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBERS: ATTEST: City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ~'1i, I COMMUNITY ~E~VICE& $ Repo t DATE: March 16, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REVISING REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO POSSESSION AND CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES WITHIN CITY PARKS, AND AMENDING TITLE 12 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached Ordinance revising regulations pertaining to possession and consumption of alcoholic beverages within City parks, and amending Title 12 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code in order to permit the serving of alcoholic beverages in the Senior and Community Center at Central Park under designated conditions. BACKGROUND Attached is a proposed Ordinance that would amend regulations relating to the consumption of alcoholic beverages in City parks for consideration by the City Council. This Ordinance was originally discussed by the City Council at a July 26, 2004 Central Park Workshop. Following that Workshop, the City Council approved the first reading of the proposed Ordinance at the regular Council meeting on August 18, 2004. On September 1, 2004 the City Council considered the second reading of the proposed Ordinance and voted not to approve the final Ordinance. At the City Council meeting on March 2, 2005, Councilmembers directed that reconsideration of the Ordinance be placed on the March 16, 2005 agenda for discussion. Attached are copies of the cover staff reports from the July 26, 2004 Workshop and the August 18, 2004 introduction of the Ordinance. At the March 2, 2005 meeting, the City Council also-had a question regarding any requirement for public posting of a sign or public notification regarding the serving of alcoholic beverages at Central Park. Staff has confirmed with Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) that no public notice requirement is necessary since a license is not being issued to the facility. Each individual event permitted for alcohol consumption would be required to obtain a one-day license and no public posting requirements is necessary by ABC. The proposed Ordinance will require signs to be posted at the entry to the park and within the Senior/Community Center stating where alcoholic beverages may be consumed. ORDINANCE RE CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES A T CITY PARKS March 16, 2005 Page 2 A separate item is included on the City Council agenda for March 16, 2005 to consider policies and procedures governing consumption of alcoholic beverages at Central Park. City staff continues to receive a tremendous number of requests for rental of large multi- purpose rooms that allow consumption of alcoholic beverages. In order to help meet this significant public demand, staff is therefore recommending the use of Central Park multi- purpose rooms and surrounding areas (Rancho Cucamonga Hall, David Dreier Hall, the Mesa Courtyard and the lobby area adjacent to these areas only) to allow the consumption of beer, wine and champagne only at approved functions and under strict conditions. Community Services Director Attachments -2- R A N C H O C U C A M O N C~ A COMM UIq IT¥ ~)I~,VICI~& DATE: August 18, 2004 TO:. Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager · FROM: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Ditecto~ BY: Bill Pallotto, Recreation Supervisor SUI3JEC'I': CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REVISING REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO 'POSSESSION AND CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES WlTH{N CITY PARKS, AND AMENDING TITLE iR OF THE RANCHO OUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached Ordinance revising regulations pertaining to possession and consumption of alcoholic beverages within City parks, and amending Title 12 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code in order to permit the serving of alcoholic beverages in the Senior and Community Center at Central Park under designated conditions. BACKGROUND~ANALYSIS Attached is a copy of an Ordinance that would amend regulations relating to the consumption of alcoholic beverages in City parks for consideration by the City Council. This Ordinance was reviewed and discussed by City Council at the July 26, 2004 City Council Central Park Workshop. As discussed at the Workshop, city staff continues to receive a tremendous number of requests for rental of large multi-purpose rooms that allow consumption of alcoholic beverages. In order to help meet this significant public demand, staff is therefore recommending the use of Central Park Multi-Purpose Rooms and surrounding areas (Rancho Cucamonga Hall, David Dreier Hall and the Mesa Courtyard and the lobby area adjacent to these areas only) to allow the consumption of beer, wine and champagne only at approved functions and under strict conditions. APPROVAL TO AMEND THE ALCOHOL ORDINANCE AT CENTRAL PARK August 18, 2004 Page 2 At the July 26 City Council Workshop relating to Central Park, the Council expressed their support of this Ordinance and directed staff to meet with local caterers to bring them up to date on plans for Central Park, particularly plans for room rentals,, catering policies and alcoholic beverage regulations. Staff invited all local caterers to a meeting held on Thursday, August 5. Six catering businesses were represented at the meeting as well as the Executive Director of the Chamber of Commerce. As a result of this meeting, the local caterers are now current on plans .for Central Park and are looking forward to the catering opportunities that will be presented at the new facility. Staff is making the final edits to the administrative policies and procedures that will govern the serving of beer, wine and champagne in the Central Park facility. A draft of these policies and procedures was also reviewed by the City Council atthe July 26 Workshop. These items will be presented to the City Council for approval at an upcoming City Council meeting, simultaneous with second reading of this Ordinance. Community Services .Director Attachment: Amended Alcohol Ordinance ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REVISING REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO POSSESSION AND CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES WITHIN CITY PARKS, AND AMENDING TITLE 12 OF THERANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby ordains as follows: Section 1. Subsection "B" of Section 12.04.010 of Chapter 12.04 of Title i2 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "B.I. Possess an open container of an alcoholic beverage or consume any alcoholic beverage, except as follows: a. Beer and wine that is sold within the interior of the stadium building located in the sports complex on the west side of Rochester Avenue, south of Foothill Boulevard. b. In the following areas of the .lames L. Brulte Senior Center and Goldy S. Lewis Community Center in Central Park: the David Dreier Hall, the Rancho Cucamonga Hall, thc Mesa Courtyard, and in any lobby and patio area immediately adjacent to these areas, during City-permitted or operated functions, so long as City- required insurance and security is provided, and, if required by State law, an ABC liquor license is first obtained and proof thereof provided to the City. c. Within any other areas in City parks specifically permitted City Council resolution, or otherwise by law. 2. The City Manager shall cause signs to be posted as follows: a. Subject to the provisions of subsections b and c, below, at each entrance to each City park, a sign substantially stating, as follows: 'Possession or consumption of alcoholic beverages in City parks is prohibited - R.C.M.C. § 12.04.010' b. At the entrance to the Sports Complex located on the west side of Rochester Avenue, south of Foothill Boulevard, a sign substantially stating, as follows: 'Except for the possession or consumption of beer or wine sold within the stadium building located on these premises, possession 78S367-1 or consumption of alcoholic beverages in City parks is prohibited - R.C.M.C. §12.04.010' c. At the entrance to Central Park, a sign substantially stating, as follows: 'Possession or consumption of alcoholic beverages is prohibited in this park except where posted otherwise within the James L. Bmlte Senior Center and Goldy S. Lewis Community Center - R.C.M.C. §12.04.010' 3. For the purpose of this Chapter, the term 'alcoholic beverage' or 'alcoholic beverages' shall have the meaning set forth in Section 23044 of the California Business and Professions Code, or any successor provision thereto. The term 'open container of an alcoholic beverage' shall mean any can, bottle or other receptacle containing any alcoholic beverage that has been opened, or a seal broken, or the contents of which have been partially removed." Section 2. Penalties. Any person, tis-six, partnership or corporation violating any provision of this Ordinance or the Section hereby adopted, or failing to comply with any of the requirements thereof, is guilty of an infraction, and upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by a fine not exceeding one hundred dollars ($100) for a first violation; by a fine not exceeding two hundred dollars ($200) for a second violation of the same provision within one (1) year; and by a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars ($500) for each additional violation of the same provision within one (1) year. Section 3. Severability. The City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance or the Section hereby adopted be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences and words of this Ordinance and said Section shall remain in full force and effect. 785367-1 Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published in the manner prescribed by law. PASSED AND ADOPTED this . day of ,2004. Mayor I, Debbie Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby ceaify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting .of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of ,2004, and was finally passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of ,2004, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: AB SENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: AB STAINED: COUNCIL.MEMBERS: ATTEST: City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga I:\COMMSERV~CENTRAL PARK PROJECT~004XAIcohol Ordinnnee AmendmenLT.29.04.DOC 78eo367-1 R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A · COMMUNITY ~ERVICE& DATE: July 26, 2004 TO:. Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROt~ Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director SUBJECT: REVIEW. OF PROGRAMMING, POLICIES AND FEES FOR THE CENTRAL PARK SENIOR AND COMMUNITY CENTER BACKGROUND: Phase I of the Central Park improvementS, which includes the Senior and Community Center and approximately fifteen acres of open space, is expected to open to the public in winter, 2005. Since the City obtained outside construction funding for the project over two and one-half years ago, City staff and the project team have completed the design, implemented construction of the improvements and continued the development of programs that will take place in the new Center. Additionally, staff has further developed the proposed policies and fees associated with use of these facilities. This City Council session has been scheduled in order to provide the Council with a historical update on the planning of Central Park and to present Council members with recommendations on specific policy items'that will soon be forwarded to the City Council at a regular meeting. Central Park History The dream for Central Park has been in existence from almost the time of incorporation of the City. Central Park has long been envisioned to be the cornerstone of Rancho Cucamonga's park system, providing community-wide recreational amenities and serving as a location in the center of the City where residents can gather. On September 2, 1987, the City Council approved the Central Park Master Plan Report recommended by the Central Park Task Force and the Park and Recreation Commission. The Master Plan identifies specific design goals and criteria for the development of the Park. Subsequent to the initially approved Master Plan, a more detailed Design Development Report was presented to the City Council in 1997. This second report did not change any of the approved criteria; but expanded on the details and described the vision for much larger facilities. Due to financial constraints in the 1990's, no funds were available to develop Central Park. Increased community interest CENTRAL PARK WORKSHOP July 26, 2004 Page 2 in the late 1990's prompted the City to re-establish the Central Park Task Force in Order to research possible funding mechanisms. This Task Force recommended that the community be allowed to vote on the possibility of forming a citywide Community Facilities District to fund construction and operation of park improvements. This vote occurred in May, 2000, but was defeated. Following this election, and recognizing the increasingly urgent need for an expanded Senior Center, the City embarked on exploring other avenues of funding for Central Park and has been extremely successful. State Senator Jim Brulte was able to include $10 million for the Senior/Community Center in the 2002 Park Bond Act and Congressman Dreier was able to obtain alm. ost $1 million in federal funds for the Senior Center. Federal Community Development Block Grant funds were set aside for the Senior Center construction. A donation by the Lewis Corporation provided more than $1 million specifically for the Community Center. Other State park grants were obtained for the landscaping adjoining the Cent6r. After much hard work, funds were available for the design and construction of the Phase 1 improvements. Since almost all of the available funds were obtained for the Senior and/or Community Center, the Phase I improvements include this 57,000 square foot community building along with adjoining landscaping, parking, infrastructure and access improvements. The design criteria followed by staff and the design team for Phase I improvements has been in full compliance with the Master Plan approved for Central Park by the City Council in 1987 and supported again in 2000 prior to the Community Facilities District election. Of course, some changes have occurred in the specific facility requirements. as time has progressed, most notably the following changes in the area of the park referred to as the Omnicenter, where the community meeting facilities have always been planned: The Pedorming Arts Center originally called out for Central Park will be developed instead on a smaller scale in Victoria Gardens. The Library envisioned for Central Park has been deferred for future conslderat~o due to the anticipated construction of the Victoria Gardens facility. The design for the current Senior/Community Center has been significantly reduced in size from the design development plans due to funding constraints. Besides these facility updates, all of the approved design criteria relating to grading, design and architecture have been closely followed. The building amenities are consistent with the Central Park Master Plan which include meeting rooms, arts and crafts rooms, senior programming spaces, playschool rooms, teen center and multi- purpose event halls. The interior/exterior finishes, furniture choices, mechanical systems and equipment have been selected to reflect the high standards of the City, both in terms of aesthetics and life expectancy. Please see Exhibit 1 for a copy of the original Design Development Report for Central Park which describes the approved design criteria. CENTRAL PARK wORKSHOP Ju~/ 26, 2004 Page 3 The architect for the Senior/Community Center was contracted in May, 2002, to begin design work. Following a very intense design period which included design review ' sessions with the Park and Recreation Commission and City Council, the City Council approved the plans and specs and authorized staff to go to bid in July, 2003. The contract for construction was awarded in September, 2003. The landscape portion of the project was approved by the City Council in December, 2003, and awai'ded.~for construction in February, 2004. Central Park Operating Budget Over the past two and one-half years since the project began, the City's operating budget has become a strong concern. State budget challenges have resulted in the taking away of City funds to balance the State budget. In developing programming and operational plans for the Senior and Community Center, every effort has been made to keep operating expenses Iow and maximize revenues wherever possible. From a program perspective, all of the current senior citizen activities will be relocated from the existing Senior Center. While staff anticipates some significant increases in senior participation, no plans are being made for new senior programs at this time. On the Community Center side, almost all the initial programs planned for the facility will be fee-based, cost recovery programs. Not including costs for maintenance, the Community Services Department full year of operation at Central Park Phase 1 is expected to cost $731,640. Revenues in the annual.amount of $318,710 are projected. Of the total revenue, $195,000 is projected from facility rentals, primarily from rental of the two main event halls. ~ Senior and Community Center Programming The Senior and Community Center will provide recreational and human services for all age groups from. pre-school through senior citizens. Services will be provided through fee-based City programs and partnerships with other organizations. As noted in the budget discussion, the facilities will also be available during non-program times for rental. The Community Services Department will, of course, be relocating all the existing senior programs to the new Center, anticipating a significant increase in participation. Staff will also be offering a number of new and expanded fee-based classes, especially a significant expansion of the Playschool program. Fee-based programs will also be initiated for the new Internet/Computer Room. As part of the project design process and the ongoing program and services planning, staff developed a bullet point list describing a programming and services vision for Phase 1 of Central Park. This vision is a refinement of the programming and partnership goals that have been identified for the Community Services Department over the past years. This list is attached as Exhibit 2. This vision has served to guide staff in developing plans for the Center. As noted previously, due to budget limitations, staff is not considering any significant expansion of programs or services that would require general fund support. See Exhibit 3 for more detailed list of programs to be offered. Also reference enclosed building floor plan, Exhibit 4, as a reminder of program rooms and spaces. CENTRAL PARK WORKSHOP July 26, 2004 Page 4 YMCA Partnership The Community Services Department has continued to strengthen its programming. partnerships with the YMCA over the past few years. During the discussions associated with selling the City-owned property adjacent to the south side of Milliken Park, the City and YMCA informally agreed that the City would lease space in the Central Park Senior/Community Center to the YMCA to help them establish their programming presence ih the Park. There was also an informal agreement that if, and when, the YMCA was able to raise all the funds necessary to build their own program/.. administrative building, the City would work with the YMCA to allow them to build their facility at Central Park in the Sports Center portion of the Park. No formal action has occurred regarding these future options. Generally speaking, the City will be leasing space to the '~McA for their administrative staff, a drop-in Teen Program Room and two multi-purpose classrooms. As proposed, the YMCA' will be responsible for paying all direct costs associated with their use. The YMCA will concentrate on teen programs, but may also offer other programs in consultation with the Community Services Department. See Exhibit 5 for the proposed Joint Use Agreement, which has been agreed to by City and YMCA staff. Also, see Exhibit 6 for a floor plan highlighting YMCA use areas. Staff will be presenting this Agreement to the City Council for approval consideration in the upcoming weeks. Facility Rentals There has been a tremendous need expressed by community members for rental of meeting/event rooms, particularly rooms that would hold at least 200 people. Residents desire rental opportunities which will allow them the flexibility to set up their event the way they want, including using their own caterer, doing their own decorating, etc. The original Park Master Plan for Central Park included community facilities which would have large rooms for rent by non-profit organizations, family and business functions. The Center now under construction has two large event rooms and many smaller meeting rooms, which will be in very high demand. To prepare for these facility rentals, staff has developed a chad showing recommendations of rental priorities for each room and for each type of user group. Generally, staff is suggesting that all user groups have equal advance scheduling privileges for the small and large rooms, while private resident activities get the most advance scheduling rights to the main event halls, followed by business uses. These priorities are recommended to maximize revenue potential inthe event halls on weekends to help offset the cost of operating the facilities. See Exhibit 7 for recommended priorities chart. These priorities will be presented to the City Council for consideration at an upcoming meeting. Staff has also prepared a detailed list of recommended user rental fees based on existing City fees and extensive surveys of surrounding cities and businesses. See Exhibit 8 for these recommended fees. These fees will be included in the City's amended fee resolution to be presented to the City Council in August. Background survey information is included in the packet as Exhibit 9. Since different facilities offer CENTRAL PARK WORKSHOP July 26, 2004 Page 5 many varied.kinds of services, it is difficult to conduct a survey of fees that is consistent from facility to facility. In order to assure a valid comparison of fees, staff prepared a fee summary for a typical wedding event for 200 attendees, comparing fees and services of similar nearby facilities. That analysis is attached as Exhibit 10. Staff has projected revenues of $195,000 for a full year of projected operation at Central Park for rental of facilities. This revenue estimate was based on the approval of a policy that would permit consumption of alcoholic beverages, under strict conditions, in the main event halls. The City does currently permit consumption at the Epicenter, 'Senior Center, Civic Center and Chaffey-Garcia House. The current Ordinance does not permit alcoholic beverages at parks. See Exhibit 11 for existing Alcohol Ordinance and Exhibit 12 for existing City policies relating to alcohol use. Staff is not aware of any significant challenges experienced with allowing consumption of alcoholic beverages at currently approved facilities. In preparing policy recommendations governing alcoholic beverages in the Senior and Community Center and to understand what other cities permit,, staff conducted research in two methods. First, staff sent out an e-mail listserve short survey to all League of California Cities members asking them if A) they owned a facility which they rent that seats approximately 200 or more people, B) whether they permitted the consumption of alcohol in these facilities and C) a contact name for more information. Of the 39 cities who responded, 34 owned facilities for rental that seat approximately 200 or more. Of these 34 cities, 29 permitted alcohol. Exhibit 13 indicates the results of that survey. Secondly, staff conducted a phone survey of nearby cities to obtain more detailed information regarding_whether they permit, alcohol and,. if so, what some of their policies and issues are. See Exhibit 14 for survey results. City staff has not kept specific records of public inquiries regarding rentals of large meeting rooms. As an estimation, however, supervisory staff surveyed facility coordinators at Lions West, Lions East, the Senior Center, as well as City Hall clerical staff and asked them to conservatively estimate the number of requests they receive. Staff was also asked questions relating to public's catering and decorating desires. Regarding inquiries relating to room rentals, staff estimates they receive between 70-97 requests each month to rent rooms seating over 200 people. Of these, approximately 90% inquire about a facility that permits consumption of alcoholic beverages. Exhibit 15 is a summary of these estimations. As noted, the full year revenue estimate for Central Park for facility rentals is $195,000. As a conservative estimate, approximately 70% of this amount would be lost if alcoholic beverages were not permitted, resulting in a decrease of $136,500 in revenues. This loss of projected revenues would require consideration of additional expenditure reductions in.the City's budget or expanded use of reserve funds. ' t CENTRAL PARK wORKSHOP Ju~y 26, 2OO4 Page 6 Staff is recommending that the City Council approve the consumption of beer, wine and champagne in the main event halls, governed by strict conditions. Staff's' recommendation is based primarily on the fact that the public has expressed a tremendous desire for many additional large sized event rooms within the community and that the desired uses of these facilities would most often include the serving of beer, wine and champagne. Residents who call community centers to inquire about hall rentals typically are looking for an alternative to hotel/count~J club ballrooms. Most often, they inquire about whether the City has facilities which allows the rente~ flexibility in using their own caterer, decorator, etc. Additionally, there are a number of annual · ' Community activities that would traditionally include these uses, such as the Gala, holiday parties, special receptions and Chamber of Commerce functions. Staff is confident that appropriate procedures can be implemented to minimize negativ, e effects associated with consumption of beer, wine and champagne. Of lesser, but still significant, importance is the opportunity to maximize revenues in order to pay for a quality loveI of maintenance and programming at Central Park. Based Upon review of policies currently in place in Rancho Cucamonga and in other cities, staff and the Police Department have developed a list of policies and procedures that would be followed if consumption of alcoholic beverages were permitted. The main goals of the proposed policy would be: A) Limit alcohol to beer, wine and champagne only. B) Limit the rooms where consumption would be permitted. C) Limit the length of time when consumption would be permitted. D) Provide f~. r a strong and cost effective security presence at alcohol events. E) Build in a financial commitment for renters to follow the policy. Staff is planning to present the City Council with an amendment to the current City AlcoholOrdinance in the upcoming weeks that would allow the consumption of beer, wine and champagne in the Senior and Community Center. Staff will also soon be presenting the proposed policies that would govern such uses. Copies of these two items are included as Exhibits 16 and 17 respectively. The above discussion has hopefully provided the City Council with valuable background and research information. With City Council concurrence, staff will continue with the approp late specific actions necessa~J for Council approvals. Kevin ~Ara~e Comrr mity Services Director i:~COMMSER~ouncil&Boardg~itYCouncil~StaffRep°r~g~2004~CentralPkW°rksh°pNew'OT'2604.d°c ORDINANCE NO.~_ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REVISING REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO POSSESSION AND CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES WITHIN CITY PARKS, AND AMENDING TITLE 12 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby ordains as follows: SECTION 1: Subsection "B" of Section 12.04.010 of Chapter 12.04 of Title 12 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "B.1. Possess an open container of an alcoholic beverage or consume any alcoholic beverage, except as follows: a. Beer and wine that is sold within the interior of the stadium building located in the sports complex on the west side of Rochester Avenue, south of Foothill Boulevard. b. In the following areas of the James L. Brulte Senior Center and Goldy S. Lewis Community Center in Central Park: the David Dreier Hall, the Rancho Cucamonga Hail, the Mesa Courtyard, and in any lobby and patio area immediately adjacent to these areas, during City-permitted or operated functions, so long as City-required insurance and security is provided, and, if required by State law, an ABC liquor license is first obtained and proof thereof provided to the City. c. Within any other areas in City parks specifically permitted City Council resolution, or otherwise by law. 2. The City Manager shall cause signs to be posted as follows: a. Subject to the provisions of subsections b and c, below, at each entrance to each City park, a sign substantially stating, as follows: 'Possession or consumption of alcoholic beverages in City parks is prohibited - R.C.M.C. §12.04.010' Ordinance No. Page 2 of 3 b. At the entrance to the Sports Complex located on the west side of Rochester Avenue, south of Foothill Boulevard, a sign substantially stating, as follows: 'Except for the possession or consumption of beer or wine sold within the stadium building located on these premises, possession or consumption of alcoholic beverages in City parks is prohibited - R.C.M.C. §12.04.010' c. At the entrance to Central Park, a sign substantially stating, as follows: 'Possession or consumption of alcoholic beverages is prohibited in this park except where posted otherwise within the James L. Brulte Senior Center and Goldy S. Lewis Community Center - R.C.M.C. §12.04.010' 3. For the purpose of this Chapter, the term 'alcoholic beverage' or 'alcoholic beverages' shall have the meaning set forth in Section 23044 of the California Business and Professions Code, or any successor provision thereto. The term 'open container of an alcoholic beverage' shall mean any can, bottle or other receptacle containing any alcoholic beverage that has been opened, or a seal broken, or the contents of which have been partially removed." SECTION 2: Penalties. Any person, firm, partnership or corporation violating any provision of this Ordinance or the Section hereby adopted, or failing to comply with any of the requirements thereof, is guilty of an infraction, and upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by a fine not exceeding one hundred dollars ($100) for a first violation; by a fine not exceeding two hundred dollars ($200) for a second violation of the same provision within one (1) year; and by a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars ($500) for each additional violation of the same provision within one (1) year. SECTION 3: Severability. The City Council declares that, should any prevision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance or the Section hereby adopted be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences and words of this Ordinance and said Section shall remain in full force and effect. Ordinance No. Page 3 of 3 SECTION 4: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published in the manner prescribed by law. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of ,2005. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: William J. Alexander, Mayor A'I-I'EST: Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a Regular Meeting of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the __ day of 2005, and was passed at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of ~, 2005. Executed this __ day of 2005, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk h~COMMSERV~CENTRAL PARK PROJEC3~,fiscellaneoustA~oholOrdinance. O31EOs. doc R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Staff Report DATE: March 16, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Betty Miller, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY FOR THE ACQUISITION IN EMINENT DOMAIN OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS TO AND WIDENING OF BASE LINE ROAD ACROSS A PORTION OF APN 1100-011-02 RECOMMENDATION That the City Council 1. Consider Resolution No. 05-094, a Resolution of Necessity of the City of Rancho Cucamonga declaring certain real property necessary for public purposes and authorizing the acquisition thereof in connection with the proposed improvements to and widening of Base Line Road. 2. Open and conduct a hearing on the adoption of the proposed Resolution of Necessity, receive from staff the evidence stated and referred to in this Report, take testimony from any person wishing to be heard on issues A, B, C and D, below, and consider all the evidence to determine whether to adopt the proposed Resolution, which requires a unanimous or 4/Sths vote. 3. If the City Council finds, based upon the evidence contained in and referred to in this Report, and the testimony and comments received in this hearing, that the evidence warrants the necessary findings with respect to the Resolution of Necessity, then the staff recommends that the City Council, in the exercise of its discretion, adopt the proposed Resolution No. 05-094 (which requires a 4/5ths vote of the entire Council) and authorize City staff and the City Attorney's office to take all necessary steps to file and CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT MARCH 16, 2005 Page 2 prosecute an eminent domain proceeding to acquire certain real property interests in portions of the real property commonly known as 13025 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, and identified as Assessor's Parcel Number 1100-011-02 (referred to hereafter as "Subject Property Interests"). The Subject Property Interests are more fully described in the legal description attached as Exhibit "A" and depicted on the diagram attached as Exhibit "B" to the Resolution of Necessity. Exhibits "A" and "B" are incorporated herein by this reference. RESOLUTION NO. 05-094 A RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES AND AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION THEREOF, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS TO AND WIDENING OF BASE LINE ROAD (PORTIONS OF ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 1100-011-02) BACKGROUND Resolution No. 05-094 seeks to acquire by eminent domain an approximate 0.127-acre (approximately 5,544 square foot) permanent street easement on the real property commonly known as 13025 Base Line Road, and identified as Assessor's Parcel Number 1100-011-02. The Subject Property Interests are sought for public purposes, namely for street purposes and all uses necessary or convenient thereto in connection with the proposed improvements to and widening of Base Line Road ("proposed Project") pursuant to California Constitution Article 1, Section 19, California Government Code Sections 37350, 37350.5, 37351, 40401 and 40404 and California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1230.010 et seq., including but not limited to Sections 1240.010 through 1240.050, 1240.110, 1240.120, 1240.410, 1240.510, 1240.610, 1240.650, and other provisions of law. As explained more fully below, the street improvements comprising the proposed Project were a condition of approval of Tentative Tract Map No. SUBTT16454. The street improvements are consistent with and are a proposed component of the City's General Plan. The street improvements comprising the proposed Project are also consistent with the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The proposed Project would require the acquisition of the Subject Property Interests for a permanent street easement. The legal description of the Subject Property Interests is attached as Exhibit "A" to the Resolution of Necessity and depicted on Exhibit "B" to the Resolution of Necessity. The proposed Resolution of Necessity, Resolution No. 05-094, together with its Exhibits "A" and "B" is attached to this Staff Report, and is incorporated herein by this reference. The hearing on the proposed Resolution of Necessity has been duly noticed. 11231.0141/812417.1 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT MARCH 16, 2005 Page 3 The City has extended an offer pursuant to the requirements of Government Code section 7262, et seq. to the owners of record, but no negotiated sale has been reached. Based on the timing of the proposed Project, it is necessary that the City Council consider at this time the adoption of the Resolution of Necessity for the acquisition of the Subject Property Interests by eminent domain. In order to adopt the Resolution of Necessity the City Council must find and determine that: A. The public interest and necessity require the Project. B. The Project is planned or located in the manner that will be compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury. C. The Subject Property Interests described in the Resolution of Necessity are necessary for the Project. D. The City has made the offer required by Government Code Section 7267.2 to the owners of record of the property the City seeks to acquire This hearing relates to Issues A, B, C, and D above. The amount of just compensation is not an issue before the City Council at this hearing. DISCUSSION The proposed acquisition consists of the partial acquisition of the real property commonly known as 13025 Base Line Road, and identified as Assessor's Parcel Number 1100-011-02 for an approximate 0.127-acre (5,544 square foot) permanent street easement in connection with the City's proposed improvements to and widening of Base Line Road. As explained more fully below, the street improvements comprising the proposed Project were a condition of approval on Tentative Tract Map No. SUBTT16454 ("Tentative Tract Map"). These street improvements are consistent with and are a proposed component of the City's General Plan. The improvements to and widening of Base Line Road are consistent with the City's designation of Base Line Road as a "major divided arterial" in the Cimulation Element of the General Plan. For example, the proposed Project would improve and widen Base Line Road in the area of the Tentative Tract Map development project in accordance with the City's "major divided arterial" standards and Etiwanda Specific Plan Figure 5-21. The Base Line Road frontage improvements making up the proposed Project consist of the following: (1) protecting existing curb and gutter and sidewalk, or repairing same, as required; (2) providing curb, gutter, curvilinear sidewalk and asphalt pavement as required; (3) providing a landscaped median on Base Line Road to the easterly limits of the Tentative Tract Map CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT MARCH 16, 2005 Page 4 development project and protecting and reconstructing the existing median in Base Line Road as needed to relocate the median break from Emmett Way to Shelby Place (formerly known as Street "A"); (4) providing 9500 Lumen HPSV streetlights along the Base Line Road frontage; (5) providing a bus bay at the southeast corner of Base Line Road and Etiwanda Avenue; (6) protecting existing R26 "No Stopping" signs, or replacing same, as required; (7) protecting traffic signal equipment at Base Line Road and Etiwanda Avenue, or relocating or replacing same, as required; (8) providing a Class II Bike Lane on both sides of Base Line Road from Etiwanda to the east boundary of the Tentative Tract Map development project; (9) providing a traffic signal at the intersection of Base Line Road and the proposed entrance of the Tentative Tract Map development project; and (10) modifying westbound Base Line Road left-turn lengths at Etiwanda Avenue, as required and dedicating additional right-of-way as needed at intersections. The developer of the Tentative Tract Map development project will dedicate portions of its property for the improvements discussed above. However, the developer of the Tentative Tract Map development project does not own the Subject Property Interests, which are necessary for the improvements to and widening of Base Line Road from Emmett Way to Shelby Place, which is an integral part of the proposed Project. Accordingly, it is necessary that the City Council consider the attached Resolution of Necessity at this time. Environmental Analysis The City studied and analyzed the potential environmental effects of the proposed Project in connection with its analysis of the potential environmental impacts of the Tentative Tract Map pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), Public Resources Code Section 21000, et seq., and the CEQA Guidelines, 14 Cal. Code Regs. Section 15000, et seq. The construction of the proposed Project was studied as an integral part of the Tentative Tract Map. The Planning Commission studied the potential environmental impacts of the proposed Project on August 27, 2003 when it considered the Tentative Tract Map and adopted Resolution No. 03-118. Pursuant to Resolution No. 03-118, the Planning Commission determined and resolved, based on the substantial evidence presented to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, including written and oral staff reports and public testimony, that (1) the Tentative Tract Map was consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; (2) the design or improvements of the Tentative Tract Map was consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; (3) the site was physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (4) the design of the subdivision was not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and 11231.0141/812417.1 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT MARCH 16, 2005 Page 5 wildlife or their habitat; (5) the Tentative Tract Map was not likely to cause serious public health problems; and (6) the design of the Tentative Tract Map would not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. Further, in adopting Resolution No. 03-118, the Planning Commission found that based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment on the Tentative Tract Map development application, there was no substantial evidence that the Tentative Tract Map development project would have a significant effect upon the environment. The City prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration for Tentative Tract Map No. SUBTT16454, Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00478, and Development Review DRC2003-00101 ("Mitigated Negative Declaration"). The County Clerk duly posted the Notice of Determination pursuant to the requirements of CEQA. After considering the evidence before it at its August 27, 2003 meeting, the Planning Commission adopted the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program attached to Resolution No. 03-118 and found that there was no substantial evidence that the Tentative Tract Map development project would have a significant effect up on the environment. In adopting the Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Mitigation Monitoring Program, the Planning Commission made the following findings: 1) That the Mitigated Negative Declaration had been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflected the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, that the Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application; 2) Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that would result if the Tentative Tract Map development project was approved, all significant effects had been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on this development project, which are listed in Resolution No. 03-118 as conditions of approval; and 3) Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission found that in considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Project, there was no evidence that the proposed Project would have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. 11231.0141/812417.1 ~,~ ~ ~, CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT MARCH16,2005 Page 6 Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission thereby rebutted the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. Accordingly, based on the findings and conclusions set forth in Resolution No. 03-118, the Planning Commission approved the Tentative Tract Map, the Mitigated Negative Declaration, and the Mitigation Monitoring Program, subject to the conditions set forth in the Resolution and in the Standard Conditions attached to Resolution No. 03-118. Specifically, the Planning Commission approved the Tentative Tract Map subject to several conditions, including the conditions concerning the widening of and improvements to Base Line Road discussed above. Resolution No. 03-118 also found that the Tentative Tract Map development project design is consistent with the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the Basic Development Standards therein. For example, the Tentative Tract Map development project would create opportunities wherein a population diverse in terms of income, age, occupation, race, ethnic background, lifestyle, values, interests, and religion may interact, exchange ideas, and realize common goals by creating single-family detached homes with differing price ranges adjacent to other single-family detached homes and multiple family attached homes. In addition, the Planning Commission found the Tentative Tract Map development project would encourage opportunities to mix different, but compatible, land uses and activities, adding single-family detached residences adjacent to proposed multiple-family attached residences. The Planning Commission also found that residential land uses are considered compatible with the Etiwanda Specific Plan as opposed to more intense commercial uses. Finally, the Planning Commission found that the Tentative Tract Map development project would organize land uses to avoid creating nuisances among adjacent land uses. This is consistent with the City's General Plan intent for the Low-Medium Residential District, and would result in an orderly transition in density from the Medium Residential District to the northeast adjacent to the 1-15 Freeway. As shown above, the proposed Project, which would improve and widen Base Line Road, was a condition of the approval of the Tentative Tract Map. Thus, the environmental impacts of the proposed Project, of which the Subject Property Interests are an integral part, were considered in connection with the Tentative Tract Map development project. All of the environmental documentation prepared in connection with Planning Commission Resolution No. 03-118, including any staff reports in connection with Resolution No. 03-118, the Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring 11231.0141/812417.1 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT MARCH 16, 2005 Page 7 Program, and Notice of Determination have been reviewed by City staff in connection with the proposed Resolution of Necessity and on March 8, 2005, pursuant to the criteria of Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines and Section 21166 of the Public Resources Code, staff concluded that there have been no substantial changes in the Tentative Tract Map of which the proposed Project is an integral part, and no new information of substantial importance has been obtained that would require further environmental analysis. These environmental findings are the same environmental findings for the proposed acquisition of the Subject Property Interests. The General Plan, Etiwanda Specific Plan, Planning Commission Resolution No. 03-118, the Mitigated Negative Declaration, Notice of Determination, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all environmental documentation concerning the Tentative Tract Map and all Resolutions and project documents regarding the Tentative Tract Map are on file in the City Planning Department and are incorporated in this Staff Report by this reference. Actions of City Pursuant to Government Code Section 7262, et seq.. Pursuant to Government Code Section 7262 et seq., the City of Rancho Cucamonga obtained a fair market appraisal of the Subject Property Interests, set just compensation in accordance with the appraised fair market value and extended a written offer letter on January 11, 2005 to the following owners of record of the Subject Property Interests: Shamsaddin Karimi, Gloria Ann Karimi, Hassan Malaklou, and Nahid Nassiri. A true and correct copy of the offer letter is on file in the City Engineer's Office and is incorporated in this Staff Report by this reference. To date, however, no negotiated purchase has been consummated, and the schedule for the proposed Project requires that the City Council consider the proposed Resolution of Necessity at this time. Necessary Findin.qs for Adoption of Resolution of Necessity To adopt the proposed Resolution of Necessity, the City Council must find and determine that: A. The public interest and necessity require the Project. B. The Project is planned or located in the manner that will be compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury. C. The Subject Property Interests described in the Resolution of Necessity are necessary for the Project. 11231.0141/812417.1 ,,~/{~ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT MARCH 16, 2005 Page 8 D. The City has made the offer required by Government Code Section 7267.2 to the owners of record of the property it seeks to acquire. As noted above, this hearing relates to Issues A, B, C, and D above. The amount of just compensation is not an issue before the City Council at this hearing. A. The Public Interest and Necessity Require the Project. As explained above, the City seeks to acquire the Subject Property Interests for a public purpose. Specifically, the Subject Property Interests are needed to improve and widen Base Line Road in accordance with the City's "major divided arterial" standards as shown on the Circulation Plan and Standards of the General Plan and consistent with the Etiwanda Specific Plan Figure 5-21. The proposed Project would (1) protect the existing curb and gutter and sidewalk, or repair the existing curb, gutter and sidewalk in the Tentative Tract Map development project area, as required; (2) provide curb, gutter, curvilinear sidewalk and asphalt pavement as required; (3) provide a landscaped median on Base Line Road to the easterly limits of the Tentative Tract Map development project and protect and reconstruct the existing median in Base Line Road as needed to relocate the median break from Emmett Way to Shelby Place; (4) provide 9500 Lumen HPSV streetlights along Base Line Road frontage; {5) provide a bus bay at the southeast corner of Base Line Road and Etiwanda Avenue; (6) protect the existing R26 "No Stopping" signs, or replace same, as required; (7) protect the traffic signal equipment at Base Line Road and Etiwanda Avenue, or relocate or replace same, as required; (8) provide a Class II Bike Lane on both sides of Base Line Road from Etiwanda Avenue to the east boundary of the Tentative Tract Map development project; (9) provide a traffic signal at the intersection of Base Line Road and the proposed entrance of the Tentative Tract Map development project; and (10) modify the westbound Base Line Road left-turn lengths at Etiwanda Avenue, as required and dedicate additional right-of-way as needed at intersections. The street improvements along the frontage of Base Line Road comprising the proposed Project are consistent with the City's General Plan and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The proposed Project would improve and widen Base Line Road consistent with the City's designation in its Circulation Element and in accordance with Figure 5-21 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan of Base Line Road as a "major divided arterial." For example, the ultimate street network for arterial roads and highways designated in the Circulation Plan of the City's General Plan shows what is required to provide adequate capacity for the City's travel needs based on the General Plan land uses and regional growth as forecasted by the Southern California Association of Governments. Based on the growth in the City and the growth resulting from the Tentative Tract Map development project, the proposed improvements ensure that there will be safe traffic circulation on Base Line Road and at intersections in the vicinity of the Tentative Tract 11231.0141/812417.1 ,,~// CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT MARCH16,2005 Page 9 Map development project area. The proposed Project also meets the General Plan's goal (2.6.1.7.2) of providing circulation improvements where development projects involve existing or planned routes. Here, the conditions placed on the Tentative Tract Map development project require the improvements along Base Line Road comprising the proposed Project. The proposed Project also ensures that the level of service along the intersections of Base Line Road are maintained at Level of Service "D" or better, consistent with policy 3.5.1 of the General Plan. This standard helps ensure that traffic moves safely and efficiently throughout the community and that traffic delays are kept to a minimum. The conditions placed on the Tentative Tract Map, including the street improvements comprising the proposed Project, are consistent with the General Plan, which requires adequate mitigation measures prior to, or concurrent with, project development The public interest and necessity require the proposed Project to meet the goals of the General Plan. Growth in the City and the Tentative Tract Map development project make the implementation of the proposed Project necessary at this time. The proposed Project further provides for the public health and safety by ensuring adequate traffic circulation in the vicinity of the Subject Property Interests. B. The Project is Planned or Located in the Manner that will be Compatible with the Greatest Public Good and Least Private Injury. The Subject Property Interests are necessary for the proposed Project, as planned and located, which consists of the improvements to and widening of Base Line Road. The Subject Property Interests are necessary for the proposed improvements along the frontage of Base Line Road between Emmett Way and Shelby Place. The City's General Plan designates Base Line Road as a major divided arterial and the proposed Project is consistent with that standard. As discussed above, the proposed Project will ensure traffic circulation goals are met. As planned and located, the proposed Project is consistent with the City's General Plan and furthers the goals of improving existing streets and providing adequate traffic circulation to serve this area of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The public health and safety requires that adequate streets and adequate traffic circulation accompany land development. The proposed Project, as planned and located, is necessary to meet the increased growth and development in this part of the City. The Subject Property Interests are necessary for the construction of the proposed Project along the frontage of Base Line Road between Emmett Way and Shelby Place. The larger parcel of which the Subject Property Interests are a part is located on Base Line Road directly between Emmett Way and Shelby Place. The acquisition of the Subject Property Interests is necessary to allow the City to improve Base Line Road in 11231.0141/812417.1 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT MARCH 16, 2005 Page 10 accordance with City "major divided arterial" standards and to ensure adequate traffic circulation. C. The Subject Property Interests Described in the Resolution of Necessity are Necessary for the Project. The proposed acquisition consists of the acquisition of a permanent street easement on the real property commonly known as 13025 Base Line Road, and identified as Assessor's Parcel Number 1100-011-02, for the proposed improvements to and widening of Base Line Road in the vicinity of the Tentative Tract Map development project area. As set forth above, the Subject Property Interests are necessary for the proposed Project; which implements the Circulation Element of the General Plan. The improvements to and widening of Base Line Road between Emmett Way and Shelby Place cannot be completed without the acquisition of the Subject Property Interests. The Subject Property Interests are needed to complete the frontage improvements along Base Line Road, between Emmett Way and Shelby Place, including concrete curb, gutter and sidewalk. D. The City Made the Offer Required by Government Code Section 7267.2 to the Owners of Record of the Property It Seeks to Acquire. Pursuant to Government Code Section 7252, et seq., the City obtained and approved a fair market value appraisal of the Subject Property Interests, set just compensation in accordance with the approved appraisal, and extended a written offer on January 11, 2005 to the owners of record of the Subject Property Interests, Shamsaddin Karimi, Gloria Ann Karimi, Hassan Malaklou, and Nahid Nassiri. A true and correct copy of the offer letter is on file in the City Engineer's Office and is incorporated in this Staff Report by this reference. The City has received no responses from the owners of record of the Subject Property Interests. Accordingly, the parties have not reached a negotiated purchase at this time. Respectfully Submitted, City Engineer · Vicinity Map N CITY OF Acquisition in Eminent Domain ~/~, E RANCHO CUCAMONGA to widen Base Line Road across S ENGINEERING DIVISION a Portion ofAPN 1100-011-02 ~/~/ RESOLUTION NO. 05-094 A RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES AND AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION THEREOF, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS TO AND WIDENING OF BASE LINE ROAD (PORTIONS OF ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 1100-011-02) THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE, ORDER AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is a municipal corporation, in the County of San Bernardino, State of California. Section 2. The real property interests described in Section 3 of this Resolution are to be taken for a public use, namely for a permanent street easement in connection with the proposed improvements to and widening of Base Line Road (the "Project") and all uses necessary or convenient thereto, pursuant to the authority conferred upon the City of Rancho Cucamonga to acquire property by eminent domain by California Constitution Article 1, Section 19, California Government Code sections 37350, 37350.5, 37351, 40401, and 40404 and California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1230.010 et seq. (Eminent Domain Law), including but not limited to Sections 1240.010 through 1240.050, 1240.110, 1240.120, 1240.410, 1240.510, 1240.610, 1240.650, and other provisions of law. Section 3. The City seeks to acquire an approximate 0.127-acre (5,544 square foot) permanent street easement on the real property commonly known as 13025 Base Line Road, and identified as Assessor's Parcel Number 1 I00-011-02 in connection with the improvements to and widening of Base Line Road ("Subject Property Interests"). The legal description of the Subject Property Interests is attached as Exhibit "A" to this Resolution and the Subject Property Interests are depicted on the diagram attached as Exhibit "B" to this Resolution. Exhibits "A" and "B" are incorporated herein by this reference. The Subject Property Interests are required to facilitate the widening of and improvements to Base Line Road, which is a public use. Section 4. The proposed Project is consistent with and is a proposed component of the City's General Plan and of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The street improvements comprising the proposed Project were placed as a condition of approval on Tentative Tract Map No. SUBTT16454 ("Tentative Tract Map"). The improvements to and widening of Base Line Road are consistent with the City's designation of Base Line Road as a "major divided arterial" in the Circulation Element of the General Plan. The proposed Project would improve and widen Base Line Road in the Tentative Tract Map development project area in accordance with both the City's "major divided arterial" standards and with Etiwanda Specific Plan Figure 5-21. The proposed Project would protect the existing curb and gutter and sidewalk along Base Line Road in the Tentative Tract Map development project area, or repair the same, as required. The proposed Project would also provide curb, gutter, curvilinear sidewalk and asphalt pavement 11231\0141\812816.1 along Base Line Road in the Tentative Tract Map development project ama as required. Third, the proposed Project would provide a landscaped median on Base Line Road to the easterly limits of the Tentative Tract Map development project and would protect and reconstruct the existing median in Base Line Road as needed to relocate the median break from Emmett Way to Shelby Place (formerly known as Street "A"). In addition, the proposed Project would provide 9500 Lumen HPSV streetlights along the Base Line Road frontage. It would also provide a bus bay at the southeast comer of Base Line Road and Etiwanda Avenue. In addition, the proposed Project would protect the existing R26 "No Stopping" signs, or replace these, as required. It would also protect traffic signal equipment at Base Line Road and Etiwanda Avenue, or relocate or replace this equipment, as required. Further, the proposed Project would provide a Class II Bike Lane on both sides of Base Line Road from Etiwanda to the east boundary of the Tentative Tract Map development project and provide a traffic signal at the intersection of Base Line Road and the proposed entrance of the Tentative Tract Map development project. Finally, the proposed Project would modify the westbound Base Line Road left4urn lengths at Etiwanda Avenue, as required, and would require the dedication of additional right-of-way as needed at intersections. The Subject Property Interests are needed to complete the proposed improvements along the frontage of Base Line Road between Emmett Way and Shelby Place. These improvements will further the public health and safety by ensuring adequate traffic circulation in the area. The proposed Project is also in the interest of the public health and safety because it ensures that the level of service along the intersections of Base Line Road in the vicinity of the proposed Project area are maintained at a level of Service "D" or better, consistent with policy 3.5.1 of the General Plan. This standard helps ensure that traffic moves safely and efficiently throughout the community and that traffic delays are kept to a minimum. Section 5. The potential environmental impacts of the proposed Project were studied and analyzed as an integral part of the Planning Commission's analysis of the potential environmental impacts of the Tentative Tract Map pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), Public Resources Code Section 21000, et seq., and the CEQA Guidelines, 14 Cal. Code Regs. Section 15000, et seq. The Planning Commission studied the potential environmental impacts of the proposed Project on August 27, 2003 when it considered the Tentative Tract Map and adopted Resolution No. 03-118. Pursuant to Resolution No. 03-118, the Planning Commission determined and resolved, based on the substantial evidence presented to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, including written and oral staff reports and public testimony, that (1) the Tentative Tract Map was consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; (2) the design or improvements of the Tentative Tract Map was consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; (3) the site was physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (4) the design of the subdivision was not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (5) the Tentative Tract Map was not likely to cause serious public health problems; and (6) the design of the Tentative Tract Map would not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 11231\0141\812816.1 ~/~ Further, in adopting Resolution No. 03-118, the Planning Commission found that based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment on the Tentative Tract Map development application, there was no substantial evidence that the Tentative Tract Map development project would have a significant effect upon the environment. The City prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16454, Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00478, and Development Review DRC2003-00101 ("Mitigated Negative Declaration"). The County Clerk duly posted the Notice of Determination pursuant to the requirements of CEQA. After considering the evidence before it at its August 27, 2003 meeting, the Planning Commission adopted the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program attached to Resolution No. 03-118 and found that there was no substantial evidence that the Tentative Tract Map development project would have a significant effect up on the environment. In adopting the Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Mitigation Monitoring Program, the Planning Commission made the following findings: (a) That the Mitigated Negative Declaration had been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA Guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflected the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, that the Planning Commission had reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application; (b) Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identified certain significant environmental effects that would result if the Tentative Tract Map development project was approved, all significant effects had been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on this development project, which were listed in Resolution No. 03-118 as conditions of approval; and (c) Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission found that in considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Tentative Tract Map development project, there was no evidence that the proposed Tentative Tract Map development project would have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public heating, the Planning Commission thereby rebutted the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. Accordingly, based on the findings and conclusions set forth in Resolution No. 03-118, the Planning Commission approved the Tentative Tract Map, the Mitigated Negative Declaration, and the Mitigation Monitoring Program, subject to the conditions set forth in the Resolution and in the Standard Conditions attached to Resolution No. 03-118. Specifically, the 11231\0141\812816.1 ~,~/7 Planning Commission approved the Tentative Tract Map subject to several conditions, including the improvements to and widening of Base Line Road that comprise the proposed Project. Resolution No. 03-118 also found that the Tentative Tract Map development project design was consistent with the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the Basic Development Standards therein. For example, the Tentative Tract Map development project would create opportunities wherein a population diverse in terms of income, age, occupation, race, ethnic background, lifestyle, values, interests, and religion may interact, exchange ideas, and realize common goals by creating single-family detached homes with differing price ranges adjacent to other single- family detached homes and multiple family attached homes. In addition, the Planning Commission found the Tentative Tract Map development project would encourage opportunities to mix different, but compatible, land uses and activities, adding single-family detached residences adjacent to proposed multiple-family attached residences. The Planning Commission also found that residential land uses are considered compatible with the Etiwanda Specific Plan as opposed to more intense commercial uses. Finally, the Planning Commission found that the Tentative Tract Map development project would organize land uses to avoid creating nuisances among adjacent land uses. This is consistent with the City's General Plan intent for the Low- Medium Residential District, and would result in an orderly transition in density from the Medium Residential District to the northeast adjacent to the 1-15 Freeway. All of the environmental documentation prepared in connection with Planning Commission Resolution No. 03-118, including any staff reports in connection with Resolution No. 03-118, the Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program, and Notice of Determination have been reviewed by City staff in connection with the proposed Resolution of Necessity and on March 8, 2005, pursuant to the criteria of Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines and Section 21166 of the Public Resources Code, staff concluded that there have been no substantial changes in the Tentative Tract Map of which the proposed Project is an integral part, and no new information of substantial importance has been obtained that would require further environmental analysis. These environmental findings are the appropriate environmental findings for the proposed acquisition of the Subject Property Interests. The General Plan, Etiwanda Specific Plan, Planning Commission Resolution No. 03-118, the Mitigated Negative Declaration, Notice of Determination, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all environmental documentation concerning the Tentative Tract Map and all Resolutions and project documents regarding the Tentative Tract Map are on file in the City Planning Department and are incorporated in this Staff Report by this reference. Section 6. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby finds and determines that: A. The public interest and necessity require the Project; B. The Project is planned and located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury; C. The property described on Exhibit "A" and depicted on Exhibit "B" attached hereto is necessary for the proposed Project; 11231\0141\812816.1 ~/~ D. The offer required by Section 7267.2 of the Government Code was made to the owners of record. Section 7. The City has complied with the notice requirements of Code of Civil Procedure Section 1245.235. Section 8. The findings and declarations contained in this Resolution are based upon the record before the City Council on March 16, 2005, which includes the Staff Report dated March 16, 2005 and all documents referenced therein, including the environmental documents referenced above, and any testimony, records, and documents produqed at the heating, all of which are incorporated herein by this reference. Section 9. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby authorizes and directs the City Attorney's office and staff to take all steps necessary to commence and prosecute 'legal proceedings in a court of competent jurisdiction to acquire by eminent domain the property described on Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto. Section 10. This Resolution shall take effect upon adoption. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga this 16th day of March 16, 2005. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk 11231\0141\812816.1 EXHIBIT "A" DEDICATION FOR BASE LINE ROAD (APN 1100-011-02) BEING THAT PORTION OF PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 3928, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, PER MAP THEREOF FILED IN BOOK 37, PAGE 28, OF PARCEL MAPS, 1N THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, MORE PARTICULaM~d.,Y DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING- AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 1; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 1, SOUTH 01009'56'' WEST 41.56 FEET; THENCE NORTH 41006'05'' WEST 35.12 FEET TO A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND 60.00 FEET. SOUTHERLY, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES, FROM THE CENTERLINE OF BASE LINE ROAD AS SHOWN ON SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY ROAD DEPARTMENT MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT NO. SV-403; THENCE ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, SOUTH 89°47'25'' WEST 117.24 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, NORTH 89052'32'' WEST 114.63 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 41033'42'' WEST 34.75 FEET TO A POINT IN A LINE PARALLEL WI'IH AND 10.00 FEET WESTERLY, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES, FROM THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 1; THENCE SOUTH 89059'22'' WEST 20.00 FEET TO A POINT IN THE WESTERLY LINE OF EMMETr WAY, 30.00 FEET WIDE, AS SHOWN ON SAID PARCEL MAP; THENCE ALONG LAST- MENTIONED WESTERLY LINE, NORTH 00000'38'' WEST 40.18 FEET TO A POINT IN THE WESTERLY PROLONGATION OF THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 1; THENCE ALONG SAID PROLONGATION AND NORTHERLY LINE, NORTH 89047'25'' EAST 298.87 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 5,544 SQUARE FEET OF LAND, MORE OR LESS. SEE EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF. PREPARED BY MADOLE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. OF THE INLAND EMPIRE WILLIAM ROARO JAS'SO, P.L.S. 4756 EXPIRATION DATE: 9/30/2005 J.N. 652-1668 February 24, 2004 Page 1 of 1 ADDITIONAL STREET DEDICA TIOIV ~ .RE:PCL. 1,P.M.5928 II SAN BERNARDINO CO, ROAD ~-DEPL MASTER PLAN N89'47'25"E ~AMENDMENT NO. $V-403 I N89'47'25" ¼ N$9'4 7'25 "E 298.87' P.O.B. 114.63 N41 '06 '05"W 40. 18' 35. ADDITIONAL DEDICATION N41'37'42 "E 34.75 NE COR. P~l_. P.M. J928 20.00' ~ PCL. I ~ P.M. No. 5928 I.~o' P.M.B. 57//28 '-~ 0=5°29 '07' L=55. 42 T=17.72 M.B. 77 ~ Page I of 1 I~ADOLE & ASSOCIATES, INC. \\ ~\ E~:_9-.~,-.Z~S. .o.~vr..~ ~ rx~.~,~ R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DE PART,lENT Staff Report DATE: March 16, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Erica Darplee, Management Analyst I Robert Lemon, Management Analyst II SUBJECT: UPDATE ON IMPACTS OF MEASURE I ORDINANCE ON CiTY TRANSPORTATION FEE STRUCTURE RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council direct staff to prepare a new Transportation Fee Ordinance that complies with the requirements of SANBAG's Measure I Ordinance and to place this proposed Transportation Fee Ordinance on a future City Council agenda, subject to all necessary public noticing and public hearing requirements, at which time the City Council may consider the adoption of this Transportation Fee Ordinance. BACKGROUND: In November 2004, County of San Bernardino voters approved an extension of Measure I, the County's one-half of one percent transactions and use tax for transportation improvements. In conjunction with this 30-year extension of Measure I is a SANBAG Measure I Ordinance that impacts the transportation fee programs of all cities within San Bernardino County. A specific provision of the Measure I Ordinance stipulates that each local jurisdiction must develop a "development mitigation program" to address regional transportation needs. Although the City has an existing transportation fee program, with these fees being utilized for the design and construction of specific, local roadway projects, the transportation fees have not been adjusted since 1990. SANBAG's new Measure I Ordinance requires each local agency to either update, or initiate, a development financing mechanism within two years of the measure's passage (November 2006). The development of a qualifying transportation fee program includes SANBAG's requirement for all agencies to update the cost estimates for all of the projects identified in their fee programs so that SANBAG may make a consistency finding for the Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP), in which SANBAG verifies that an CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT IMPACTS OF MEASURE I ORDINANCE ON CITY TRANSPORTATION FEE STRUCTURE MARCH 16, 2005 PAGE 2 adequate revenue stream has been developed to adequately fund all projects based upon updated cost estimates. Additionally, the transportation fee program must fund new development's fair share contribution to the cost of projects identified in SANBAG's Development Mitigation Nexus Study. The Development Mitigation Nexus Study is a subsection of the Congestion Management Program and is the component that lists every major regional project identified as a funding priority eligible to receive future Measure I funding (2010-2030). The Nexus Study also identifies the percentages of developer fair share contributions that must be collected by local jurisdictions for those projects identified for priority funding (i.e. major arterial projects, freeway interchange projects and railroad grade crossings). However, SANBAG has explicitly stated that is the sole responsibility of each local agency to determine allocations of fair share costs per land use type and the estimate of specific fee levels will be the responsibility of local jurisdictions. Agencies that comply with the requirement to formulate a qualifying transportation fee program are eligible to receive up to 57% of Measure I funding for specific projects within their jurisdictions that are identified in the Development Mitigation Nexus Study. Rancho Cucamonga has three projects identified in this study: · 1-15/Base Line Interchange Improvements · 1-15/Arrow Interchange · Haven Avenue Railroad Grade Separation The combined total of potential Measure I funding for these three projects is as much as $34.6 million. Currently, Measure I extension money will not be available until after the year 2010. In the case of Rancho Cucamonga's projects, SANBAG has advised staff that funds will likely be unavailable until after 2015. One solution to this problem is the possibility of entering into a cooperative agreement with SANBAG that states the City will build the projects with local agency funds and will be reimbursed for the portion that would be Measure I funded when the money becomes available after 2010. SANBAG has already indicated a willingness to move in this direction and this idea, if adopted, will allow these projects to expeditiously move forward as they are vital to the community. Agencies that do not comply with the new Measure I Ordinance will risk the loss of Measure I funding for all projects within their jurisdictions that are included in SANBAG's Development Mitigation Nexus Study. Additionally, any agency that does not comply will also risk loss of consistency with the Regional Congestion Management Plan required by CEQA. This will result in the agency being deleted from the Regional Congestion Management Plan and that agency will be required to prepare its own congestion management plan for submittal directly to the State of California. Failure to comply with all state requirements will put the agency's Gas Tax and annual Measure I funds at risk. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT IMPACTS OF MEASURE I ORDINANCE ON CITY TRANSPORTATION FEE STRUCTURE MARCH 16, 2005 PAGE 3 ANALYSIS: The three projects identified in the SANBAG Nexus Study that are subject to the developer fair share contribution requirement are identified below. The following table also identifies each project's total estimated cost, developer fair share percentage, the developer fair share dollar amount, and the potential Measure I funding available if the City approves a qualifying transportation fee program: Potential Measure Project Title Total Project Cos~ % Dev. Fl Dev. FS Dollar., Funds I-15/Baseline Interchange Improvements $16,000,000 66% $10,560,000 $9,100,000 I-15/Arrow Interchange $29,000,000 52% $15,080,000 $16,500,000 RxR Grade Separation at Haven $15,910,000 11% $1,782,000 $9,000,000 The existing Transportation Development Fee Program does include these three projects. However, the project estimates generated in 1990 and included within the Fee Program are now insufficient to adequately fund the developer fair share dollar amount for each project. Similarly, the estimated project costs for all projects included in the existing fee program are also outdated and insufficient to cover the total project costs. As part of the development of a qualifying transportation fee program, SANBAG is requiring all agencies to update the cost estimates for all of the projects identified in their fee programs so that SANBAG may make a consistency finding for the Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP), in which SANBAG verifies that an adequate revenue stream has been developed to adequately fund all projects based upon updated cost estimates. Staff has developed a new comprehensive project list for the Transportation Fee Program that includes the developer fair share percentage for the three projects identified in the Nexus Study, updated costs for all proposed projects, deletes completed projects, and includes some additional projects.~ The total valuation of the full listing of projects is approximately $108 million. The Transportation Fund has a fund balance of approximately $20 million; the resultant $88 million is what must be collected via trar~sportation fees. Staff further evaluated the remaining developable land within the City that would pay transportation fees to create a new fee schedule based on the $88 million revenue requirement. The schedule has 14 different land use classifications, however, the existing and proposed fees for the three most common classifications are detailed below for comparison purposes: copy of this project Fist is attached at the end of this staff report. 22 / CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT IMPACTS OF MEASURE I ORDINANCE ON CITY TRANSPORTATION FEE STRUCTURE MARCH 16, 2005 PAGE 4 Existing Fee Proposed Fee Single-Family $1,710/unit $3,342/unit Dwelling Unit Multi-Family $1,026/unit $2,264/unit Dwelling Unit Commercial Shopping Center $2.565/sf $5.614/sf As previously stated, if the City of Rancho Cucamonga does not comply with the new Measure I Ordinance it will risk the loss of Measure I funding for the three Rancho Cucamonga projects that are included in SANBAG's Development Mitigation Nexus Study and will also risk loss of consistency with the Regional Congestion Management Plan. This will result in the City being required to prepare its own congestion management plan and the potential loss of all Gas Tax and annual Measure I funds should the City of Rancho Cucamonga's independent congestion management plan fail to comply with all state requirements. Additionally, if the Transportation Fee Program is not updated to factor in the realities of increased property values, materials costs and inflation, project costs will continue to escalate, depleting Transportation Fee resources and resulting in the inability to complete all projects on the existing list. It is recommended that Council direct staff to prepare a new Transportation Fee Ordinance that complies with the requirements of SANBAG's Measure I Ordinance and to place this proposed Transportation Fee Ordinance on a future City Council agenda, subject to all necessary public noticing and public hearing requirements, at which time the City Council may consider the adoption of this ordinance. If approved, this new ordinance will allow the City to potentially receive as much as $34.6 million of Measure I funding and maintain consistency with the Regional Congestion Management Plan. In addition, this action will establish dedicated funding for all transportation projects of city- wide significance, preserve transportation fee credits for developers constructing eligible roadways, and provide the flexibility to add additional important projects to the Transportation Fee Program Project List. Respectfully Submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer DRAFT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TRANSPORTATION FEE PROGRAM PROJECTS AND PROJECT COSTS February 3, 2005 Freeway Interchanges: Base Line Road at 1-15 Freeway, widen NB and SB on-ramps = $200,000 (Total project cost = $950,000, Caltrans funds -- $750,000.) Foothill Boulevard at I-15 Freeway, widen NB and SB on-ramps = $650,000 (Total project cost = $1.4 million, Caltrans funds = $750,000.) West Half of Base Line Road at I-15 Freeway Interchange = $10,560,000 (Assuming the east half is built by the City of Fontana) (Total construction cost = $16 million. ROW purchased by City RDA. 100% City of RC, New Development fair share percentage= 66%) Arrow Route at I- 15 Freeway Interchange = $15,080,000 (Total construction cost = $29 million, ROW purchased by City RDA. New Development fair sham percentage= 52%) Total = $26,490,000 Railroad Grade Separations and Crossings: Haven Avenue at Metrolink Crossing $1,782,000 (Total Project Cost = $15,910,000, New Dev. Fair Share = 11%) 6th Street, improve RXR crossing gates, west of Lucas Ranch -- $300,000 6th Street, install new RXR crossing gates, east of Santa Anita = $300,000 Hellman Ave, upgrade existing RXR crossing gates at 8th = $300,000 Total -- $2,682,000 Bridges: 6th at Cucamonga Creek Channel (50% RC, 50% Ontario) = $250,000 9th at Cucamonga Creek Channel (widen) = $250,000 Arrow Route at Etiwanda Ditch (widen existing bridge) = $500,000 Banyan Street at Etiwanda Creek Channel (new) = $1,000,000 Hellman at Cucamonga Creek Channel (50% RC, 50% Ontario) = $500,000 Whitman Avenue at Etiwanda Ditch (new) = $500,000 Wilson Avenue at Day Creek Channel (new) = $1,000,000 Wilson Avenue at Etiwanda Creek Channel (new) = $2,000,000 Total = $6,000,000 Streets: 6th Street, Santa Anita to Etiwanda (backbone only) = 2,900 If $387,000 Arrow Route, Grove to Baker, widen 2 to 4 lanes = 1,800 If $877,000 Arrow Route, widen south side 500 fi east of I-15 to 1,300 ft east= 800 If $687,000 Banyan, Etiwanda to East, north side only = 1,500 If $569,000 Banyan Street, East Ave to Wardman/Bulloch (new alignment) = 4,500 If . $5,278,000 Base Line Road, Etiwanda to I- 15 Fwy, north side 2 to 3 lanes, = 400 If $331,000 Cherry Avenue, west side only, Wilson to 1-15 Fwy. = 2,600 If $561,000 Church Street, Archibald to Haven, widen 2 to 4 lanes = 2,500 If $1,020,000 East Ave, 1-15 to Victoria, various bottlenecks = 600 If $355,000 East Ave, Fire Station to Wilson, (new) = 1,300 If $797,000 East Ave, Wilson Avenue to North Rim Way (new) 500 If $139,000 Etiwanda Ave., 6th to Arrow Route, widen 2 to 4 lanes, = 3,000 If $2,864,000 Etiwanda Ave, Miller to 850 ff north of Miller, widen east side = 850 If $205,000 Etiwanda Ave, Banyan to Wilson, curb and gutter east side only = 2,500 If $949,000 Etiwanda Ave. existing northern terminus to North Rim Way (new) 500 If $189,000 Foothill Blvd, Vineyard to Hellman, widen 4 to 6 lanes = NA $200,000 Foothill Blvd., Hellman to 700 fi east (north side only) = 2,700 If $225,000 Foothill Blvd at Archibald, widen intersection = LS $4,371,000 Foothill Blvd., Archibald to Hermosa (4 to 6 lanes) = NA $ !,266,000 Grove Avenue, 8th to Tapia Via, widen east side I to 2 lanes -- 2,000 If $644,000. Grove Avenue, 'SanBem to Foothill, widen east side 1 to 2 lanes = 470 If $404,000 Haven Avenue, Base Line to 1-210 Fwy, west side only * 5,000 If $6,000,000 Lower Crest (collector), Etiwanda to East (new) 2,600 If $439,000 Miller Avenue, Etiwanda to East, widen 2 to 4 lanes = 2,700 If $1,323,000 Milliken Ave, 5th St to 700 ft south of 5th' west side only = 700 If $194,000 Victoria St, east PL of EHS to 1-15 Fwy, improve both shoulders = 400 If $195,000 Vintage Drive, Etiwanda Avenue to 1300 f~ west (new) = 1,300 If $256,000 Wilson Avenue, Milliken to Day Creek Blvd, new. = 6,500 If $4,000,000 Wilson Avenue, Etiwanda Ave to East Avenue, (backbone only = 2,700 If $311,000 Wilson Avenue, East Avenue to WardmanfBulloch, new = 4,000 If $3,155,000 Young's Canyon, Cherry Ave. to Wardman/Bulloch, new = 6,300 If $8,162,000 Total = $46,353,000 Summary: Freeway Interchanges = $26,490,000 Railroad Crossings = $2,682,000 Bridges = $6,000,000 Streets = $46,353,000 Traffic signals, (77 each at $140,000) = $10,780,000 Signal Interconnect System = $4,517,000 Total= $96,822,000 Funds currently in Transportation Development Fee Account = -$20,000,000 Sub-Total= $76,822,000 Administration Fee (15%) = $11,523,000 Total = $88,345,000 R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A COHHUNIT¥ c$ I~ 1~ V I C I~ 8 DATE: Mamh 16, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF POLICIES AND PROCEDURES GOVERNING THE SERVING OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES IN THE SENIOR AND COMMUNITY CENTER AT CENTRAL PARK. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council review and approve the revised policy that would govern the serving of alcoholic beverages in designated areas of Central Park in addition to the current policy that permits alcohol usage at the Senior Center, Civic Center Court Yard and the Chaffey-Gamia House. BACKGROUND~.NALYSlS At the Mamh 16, 2005 meeting, the City Council will reconsider approval of an Ordinance *that would permit the consumption of beer, wine and champagne at the new Central Park Senior/Community Center under designated conditions. If the Ordinance is approved, it is necessary to also authorize administrative policies and procedures to govern the consumption of alcoholic beverages. There is a current policy in place that governs use at the present Senior Center, Civic Center Courtyard and the Chaffey- Gareia House. A revised policy is attached that includes the Central Park Senior and Community Center for consideration. This policy was originally reviewed by the City Council at the July 26, 2004 City Council Central Park Workshop. Following that Workshop, the City Council considered approval of the recommended policies and procedures, along with second reading of the Ordinance, at the September 1, '2004 meeting. The City Council did not approve the Ordinance or the policies/precedures at the September 2004 meeting, but the Council members did hold a discussion regarding the proposed policies and procedures. During that discussion, members identified a number of areas within the policies and precedures for future clarification or adjustment. The attached proposed policies and procedures include modifications to the original recommendations (shown in bold type) to address those concerns brought up by the Council: The .rooms identified for alcohol CITY COUNCIL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES REGARDING ALCOHOL USE AT CENTRAL PARK March 15, 2005 Page 2 use at Central Park are the Multi-Purpose Rooms and surrounding areas (Rancho Cucamonga Hall, David Dreier Hall and the Mesa Courtyard and the lobby area adjacent to these areas only). The policy proposes to allow the consumption of beer, wine and champagne only at approved functions. Guidelines The attached policy, along with the bolded modifications, addresses the need for on-site security, how and where alcohol beverages will be served, ABC licensing requirements, and user insurance requirements indemnifying the City. In general, all groups or individuals must submit an application to serve alcohol at the designated site locations and are responsible for the additional damage/security deposit in addition to the security deposit for the facility rental. All alcohol related rentals are limited to a four (4) hour block of time and all alcohol possession or consumption is strictly prohibited in the restrooms, parking lots, and other facility rooms, etc. Serving of any alcoholic beverages must end one hour before the scheduled close of the event. In addition, only beer, wine, and/or champagne will be permitted to be sold or consumed at the approved locations. These policies and procedures have been developed by Community Services Department staff, in cooperation with the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department. Community Services Director Attachment: Alcohol Beverage Use Policy httCOUNCI!..&BOARDSIClTYCOUNClLISTAFFREPORTSt2~4[ALCOHOLPOLICY.031605 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT ALCOHOL BEVERAGE USE POLICY POLICY NO.: 500-45 ,,.~RANCHO PAGE: 1 of 4 I,~U~CAMONGA EFFECTIVE: August 16, 2001 ~ALIFORNIA REVISED: March 16, 2005 APPROVED: ALCOHOL BEVERAGE USE POLICY SUBJECT: SERVING OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AT THE GOLDY S. LEWIS COMMUNITY CENTER, THE JAMES L. BRULTE SENIOR CENTER, THE MESA COURTYARD AT CENTRAL PARK, RANCHO CUCAMONGA SENIOR CENTER, CIVIC CENTER COURT YARD AND CHAFFEY- GARClA HOUSE PURPOSE: To specify guidelines and parameters that ensure a safe and orderly use of alcohol at the designated facilities. POLICY: The following procedures will be followed in the serving of alcohol beverages by all users and guests of the Goldy S. Lewis Community Center, the James L. Brulte Senior Center, The Mesa Courtyard at Central Park, Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center, Civic Center Court Yard and Chaffey-Garcia House. GENERAL POLICIES AND GUIDELINES: The City of Rancho Cucamonga is interested in meeting the needs of the community in their use of the Goldy S. Lewis Community Center, the James L. Brulte Senior Center, Mesa Courtyard at Central Park, Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center, the Civic Center Court Yard and the Chaffey-Garcia House by allowing the consumption and sale of alcoholic beverages at approved functions. It is the intent of the City to authorize the serving of alcoholic beverages within these six (6) City facilities as long as strict measures are adhered to in order to ensure that these functions remain safe and orderly. 1. Groups or individuals wishing to serve alcoholic beverages must submit an application for permit to use the Goldy S. Lewis Community Center, the James L. Brulte Senior Center, The Mesa Courtyard, Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center, Civic Center Court Yard or Chaffey-Garcia House at least 60 days prior to the event. 2. Any applicant permitted to serve alcoholic beverages will be required to pay a $50.00 administrative fee. A supplementary damage/security deposit of $500.00, in addition to the security deposit for rental of the facility, will also be required for all events at which alcohol will be served. ALCOHOL BEVERAGE USE POLICY PAGE 2 3. For the purpose of this policy the term "alcoholic beverage" or "alcoholic beverages" shall be defined as beer, wine, and/or champagne only. The City reserves the right to place restrictions on the use of alcoholic beverages in accordance with State/Federal Law and City Ordinances. Failure to comply with any regulations will result in the immediate revocation of permission to use alcohol. 4. Any function where alcoholic beverages are to be served will require a minimum of one-uniformed Deputy Sheriff/Reserve or private security for four hours, at a rate equal to their actual cost plus benefits per hour. This determination will be made by the Recreation Supervisor, in coordination with the Police Department. Private Security is identified as a state licensed Security Company by the Department of Consumer Affairs. Private security officers will not be armed.; ,'.-.=.'..~.='J- cff~cc;= '.'.'~I~ ~= · ' = c.".'c 'J. lc; cf addition to the uniformed Deputy Sheriff/Reserve or unarmed Private Security officers; trained staff will be assigned to monitor any area(s) serving alcoholic beverages. The number of staff monitoring these areas will be adjusted depending on how many guests will be attending the function. The additional security and staff fees will be the responsibility of the renter of the facility. 5. At the discretion of the Recreation Supervisor (Goldy S. Lewis Community Center, the James L. Brulte Senior Center, The Mesa Courtyard Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center or Civic Center Court Yard) or the Etiwanda Historical Society Board of Directors (Chaffey-Garcia House) and/or the Sheriff's Department, small groups will require Private Security, larger groups may require one or more uniformed Deputy Sheriffs/Reserve or Private Security depending on the potential risk associated with the specific use. All applications for alcohol use will be reviewed by those City staff (Community Services/Civic Center Court Yard) or Board of Directors (Chaffey-Garcia House) and the Sheriffs Department on an individual basis to determine the risk level presented by = ;c*.=.-.!~=l "=ct the functions and activities to be held during the proposed rental. 6. All alcoholic beverages must be sold, served and consumed inside the room scheduled by that particular party reserved by the reserving party, including only the Rancho Cucamonga Hall, or section thereof, at the Goldy S. Lewis Community Center; or the David Dreier Hall, or section thereof, at the James L. Brulte Senior Center; or Mesa Courtyard, only the Mission or Zinfandel Rooms at the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center in conjunction with rental of one or both of the afore mentioned facilities. ALCOHOL BEVERAGE USE POLICY PAGE 3 Alcohol possession or consumption is strictly prohibited in the patio, hallways, restrooms, parking lots, other rooms, etc. Alcohol use at the Civic Center Court Yard is to remain within the Court Yard and not to expand out of the immediate Court Yard, such as the parking lot, Civic Center walkways or inside the Civic Center building. Alcohol use at the Chaffey-Garcia House shall be limited to the fenced in seating area and the patio area and not to expand out of that area such as the parking lot. At every rental function at which alcohol will be served, staff shall place a sign in a location visible to the public that the alcoholic beverages are being served by a private renter, not by the City. 7. For rental functions where there is a guest(s) of honor, each of those guest(s) of honor must be at least 21 years of age for consumption of alcoholic beverages to be permitted. 8. No alcoholic beverages shall be served to any person or served by any person less than 21 years of age. 9. Only beer, wine and/or champagne are permitted to be sold or consumed. All drinks must be consumed from individual clear containers. There will be no drinking directly from bottles or cans. Champagne bottles must be opened only in the kitchen (Goldy S. Lewis Community Center, James L. Brulte Senior Center, Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center and Chaffey-Garcia House) or at a designated serving table (Civic Center Court Yard and Chaffey-Garcia House). 10. In the Central Park facilities, permission for consumption of alcoholic beverages shall be limited to Friday evenings, Saturdays/Sundays and holidays only. Alcoholic beverage functions may be approved during other times for City-sponsored activities or Rancho Cucamonga based non-profit organizations by the Community Services Director if it is determined that there is no scheduling overlap with any youth activities within the facility. 11. Serving and/or selling of alcoholic beverages may be allowed for a maximum of four (4) hours. Serving of any alcoholic beverages must end one hour before the scheduled close of the event. 12. The applicant shall remove all such alcoholic beverages and empty bc,"Jc= ~ containers from the premises immediately following the approved function. 13. Failure to abide by the above policies will result in fodeiture of a portion or all of the required cleaning/security deposits. 14. The distribution or consumption of alcoholic beverages shall be in compliance with applicable laws, including regulations c ALCOHOL BEVERAGE USE POLICY PAGE 4 Commission. Any organization using the Goldy S. Lewis Community Center, the James L. Brulte Senior Center, The Mesa Courtyard, Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center, Civic Center Court Yard, or the Chaffey-Garcia House shall be solely responsible for obtaining all required permits or licenses relating to the distribution and consumption of alcoholic beverages on the premises. Evidence of required permits, licenses or insurance must be provided to the Recreation Supervisor (Goldy S. Lewis Community Center, James L. Brulte Senior Center, The Mesa Courtyard, Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center), and the Special Events Recreation Supervisor (Civic Center Court Yard), or the board representative of the Etiwanda Historical Society Board of Directors (Chaffey-Garcia House) ten working days prior to the scheduled event. No sales or requests for donations for alcoholic beverages are permitted without a license from the State Alcoholic Beverage Control Department. 15. Permit requirements for serving alcoholic beverages are as follows: A. If alcoholic beverages are served at a function without charge, a permit from the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control is NOT necessary. B. If beer, wine or champagne is sold at a function, or if there is a charge to attend the function the applicant must choose one of the following: (1) Either a caterer with an alcohol license must serve; (2) A temporary beer permit or a temporary wine (champagne) permit must be obtained from the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control. For the purposes of this policy, "sold" alcoholic beverages is defined as drinks that a person paid for by the use of money, admission price, tickets, or any other "token" of value. 16. To obtain a one-day alcoholic beverage permit from the ABC: A. The applicant shall apply in person to the State Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control. B. The request for the permit must be accompanied by a letter/contract from the City of Rancho Cucamonga Police Department approving the serving of alcohol beverages. Applicant must have submitted the Building Request form to a representative of the Rancho Cucamonga Community Services Department or the Chaffey-Garcia House and insured the availability of the facility prior to receiving a letter/contract from the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department addressed to the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control requesting an alcoholic beverage permit. 17. One-day permits to sell and serve alcoholic beverages may be obtained by non-profit organizations at the following location: ALCOHOL BEVERAGE USE POLICY PAGE 5 Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control 3737 Main Street, Suite 900 Riverside, CA 92501 (909) 782-4400 Once the City Alcohol Use Application and Building Request have been approved, applicant must provide a certificate of insurance (liability) for the amount of one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) or more listing the City of Rancho Cucamonga as additionally insured. I.'XCOMMSERIAE;ENTR4L PARK PROJECT~2OOSX4tcoholUsePolicy. O316OS.doc ~ 5 ~ A N C h O C U C A M O N G ~ COM~[IN ITY ~ERVICE& DATE: August 18, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager . FROM: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Ditectg~ BY.' Bill Pallotto, Recreation Supervisor SUBJEC'r: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REVISING REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO 'POSSESSION AND CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES WITHIN CITY PARKS, AND AMENDING TITLE 12 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached Ordinance revising regulations pertaining to possession and consumption of alcoholic beverages within City parks, and amending Title 12 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code in order to permit the serving of alcoholic beverages in the Senior and Community Center at Central Park under designated conditions. BACKGROUND~.NALYSlS Attached is a copy of an Ordinance that would amend regulations relating to the consumption of alcoholic beverages in City parks for consideration by the City Council. This Ordinance was reviewed and discussed by City Council at the July 26, 2004 City Council Central Park Workshop. As discussed at the Workshop, city staff continues to receive a tremendous number of requests for rental of large multi-purpose rooms that allow consumption of alcoholic beverages. In order to help meet this significant public demand, staff is therefore recommending the use of Central Park Multi-Purpose Rooms and surrounding areas (Rancho Cucamonga Hall, David Dreier Hall and the Mesa Courtyard and the lobby area adjacent to these areas only) to allow the consumption of beer, wine and champagne only at approved functions and under strict conditions. APPROVAL TO AMEND THE ALCOHOL ORDINANCE AT CENTRAL PARK August 18, 2004 Page 2 At the July 26 City Council Workshop relating to Central Park, the Council expressed their support of this Ordinance and directed staff to meet with local caterers to bring them up to date on plans for Central Park, particularly plans for room rentals,, catering policies and alcoholic beverage regulations. Staff invited all local caterers to a meeting held on Thursday, August 5. Six catering businesses were represented at the meeting as well as the Executive Director of the Chamber of Commerce. As a result of this meeting, the local caterers are now current on plans for Central Park and are looking forward to the catering opportunities that will be presented at the new facility. Staff is making the final edits to the administrative policies and procedures that will govern the serving of beer, wine and champagne in the Central Park facility. A draft of these policies and procedures was also reviewed by the City Council at.the July 26 Workshop. These items will be presented to the City Council for approval at an upcoming City Council meeting, simultaneous with second reading of this Ordinance. Attachment: Amended Alcohol Ordinance ORDINANCE NO. _~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REVISING REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO POSSESSION AND CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES WITHIN CITY PARKS, AND AMENDING TITLE 12 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby ordains as follows: Section 1. Subsection "B" of Section 12.04.010 of Chapter 12.04 of Title i2 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "B.1. Possess an open container of an alcoholic beverage or consume any alcoholic beverage, except as follows: a. Beer and wine that is sold within the interior of the stadium building located in the sports complex on the west side of Rochester Avenue, south of Foothill Boulevard. b. In the following areas of the James L. Brulte Senior Center and Goldy S. Lewis Community Center in Central Park: the David Dreier Hall, the Rancho Cucamonga Hall, the Mesa Courtyard, and in any lobby and patio area immediately adjacent to these areas, during City-permitted or operated functions, so long as City- required insurance and security is provided, and, if required by State law, an ABC liquor license is first obtained and proof thereof provided to the City. c. Within any other areas in City parks specifically permitted City Council resolution, or otherwise by law. 2. The City Manager shall cause signs to be posted as follows: a. Subject to the provisions of subsections b and c, below, at each entrance to each City park, a sign substantially stating, as follows: 'Possession or consumption of alcoholic beverages in City parks is prohibited - R.C.M.C. §12.04.010' b. At the entrance to the Sports Complex located on the west side of Rochester Avenue, south of Foothill Boulevard, a sign substantially stating, as follows: 'Except for the possession or consumption of beer or wine sold within the stadium building located on these premises, possession 785367-1 ~l~ or consumption of alcoholic beverages in City parks is prohibited - R.C.M.C. §12.04.010' c. At the entranc~ to Central Park, a sign substantially stating, as follows: 'Possession or consumption of alcoholic beverages is prohibited in this park except where posted otherwise within the James L. Brulte Senior Center and Goldy S. Lewis Community Center - R.C.M.C. {}12.04.010' 3. For the purpose of this Chapter, the term 'alcoholic beverage' or 'alcoholic beverages' shall have the meaning set forth in Section 23044 of the California Business and Professions Code, or any successor provision thereto. The term 'open container of an alcoholic beverage' shall mean any can, bottle or other receptacle containing any alcoholic beverage that has been opened, or a seal broken, or the contents of which have been partially removed." Section 2. Penalties. Any person, firm, partnership or corporation violating any provision of this Ordinance or the Section hereby adopted, or failing to comply with : any of the requirements thereof, is guilty of an infraction, and upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by a fine not exceeding one hundred dollars ($100) for a first violation; by a fine not exceeding two hundred dollars ($200) for a second violation of the same provision within one (1) year; and by a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars ($500) for each additional violation of the same provision within one (1) year. Section 3. Severability. The City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance or the Section hereby adopted be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences and words of this Ordinance and said Section shall remain in full force and effect. 785367-1 Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published in the manner prescribed by law. PASSED AND ADOPTED this . day of ,2004. Mayor I, Debbie Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of ,2004, and was finally passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the __ day of ,2004, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: AB STAINED: COUNCILMEMBERS: ATI'~ST: City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga I:\COMMSERV~CENTRAL PARK PROJEC'I~2004~Alcohol Ordinant~ AmendmenL7.29.04.DOC R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A COM~IUNITY ~EI~VlCE& DATE: July 26, 2004 TO:. Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director SUBJECT: REVIEW OF PROGRAMMING, POLICIES AND FEES FOR THE CENTRAL PARK SENIOR AND COMMUNITY CENTER BACKGROUND: Phase I of the Central Park improvementS, which includes the Senior and Community Center and approximately fifteen acres of open space, is expected to open to the public in winter, 2005. Since the City obtained outside construction funding for the project over two and one-half years ago, City staff and the project team have completed the design, implemented construction of the improvements and continued the development of programs that will take place in the new Center. Additionally, staff has further developed the proposed policies and fees associated with use of these facilities. This City Council session has been scheduled in order to provide the Council with a historical update on the planning of Central Park and to present Council members with recommendations on specific policy items that will soon be forwarded to the City Council at a regular meeting. Central Park History The dream for Central Park has been in existence from almost the time of incorporation of the City. Central Park has long been envisioned to be the cornerstone of Rancho Cucamonga's park system, providing community-wide recreational amenities and serving as a location in the center of the City where residents can gather. On September 2, 1987, the City Council approved the Central Park Master Plan Report recommended by the Central Park Task Force and the Park and Recreation Commission. The Master Plan identifies specific design goals and criteria for the development of the Park. Subsequent to the initially approved Master Plan, a more detailed Design Development Report was presented to the City Council in 1997. This second report did not change any of the approved criteria; but expanded on the details and described the vision for much larger facilities. Due to financial constraints in the 1990's, no funds were available to develop Central Park. Increased community interest CENTRAL PARK WORKSHOP Ju~y £6,2~ Page £ in the late 1990's prompted the City to re-establish the Central Park Task Force in Order to research possible funding mechanisms. This Task Force recommended that the community be allowed to vote on the possibility of fon'ning a citywide Community Facilities District to fund construction and operation of park improvements. This vote occurred in May, 2000, but was defeated. Following this election, and recognizing the increasingly urgent need for an expanded Senior Center, the City embarked on exploring other avenues of funding for Central Park and has been extremely successful. State Senator Jim Brulte was able to include $10 million for the Senior/Community Center in the 2002 Park Bond Act and Congressman Dreier was able to obtain am, ost $1 million in federal funds for the Senior Center. Federal Community Development Block Grant funds were set aside for the Senior Center construction. A donation by the Lewis Corporation provided more than $1 million specifically for the Community Center. Other State park grants were obtained for the landscaping adjoining the Center. After much hard work, funds were available for the design and construction of the Phase 1 improvements. Since almost all of the available funds were obtained for the Senior and/or Community Center, the Phase 1 improvements include this 57,000 square foot community building along with adjoining landscaping, parking, infrastructure and access improvements. The design criteria followed by staff and the design team for Phase I improvements has been in full compliance with the Master Plan approved for Central Park by the City Council in 1987 and supported again in 2000 prior to the Community Facilities District election. Of course, some changes have occurred in the specific facility requirements. as time has progressed, most notably the following changes in the area of the park referred to as the Omnicenter, where the community meeting facilities have always been planned: The Pe~orming Arts Center originally called out for Central Park will be developed instead on a smaller scale in Victoria Gardens. The Libra~J envisioned for Central Park has been deferred for future consideration due to the anticipated construction of the Victoria Gardens facility. The design for the current Senior/Community Center has been significantly reduced in size from the design development plans due to funding constraints. Besides these facility updates, all of the approved design criteria relating to grading, design and architecture have been closely followed. The building amenities are consistent with the Central Park Master Plan which include meeting rooms, a~ts and crafts rooms, senior programming spaces, playschool rooms, teen center and multi- purpose event halls. The interior/exterior finishes, furniture choices, mechanical systems and equipment have been selected to reflect the high standards of the City, both in terms of aesthetics and life expectancy. Please see ~-xh~'bi! 1 for a copy of the original Design Development Report for Central Park which describes the approved design criteria. CENTRAL PARK WORKSHOP July £6, £~4 Page $ The architect for the Senior/Community Center was contracted in May, 2002, to begin design work. Following a very intense design period which included design review ~ sessions with the Park and Recreation Commission and City Council, the City Council approved the plans and specs and authorized staff to go to bid in July, 2003. The contract for construction was awarded in September, 2003. The landscape portion of the project was approved by the City Council in December, 2003, and awa~dedJor construction in February, 2004. Central Park Operating Budget Over the past two and one-half years since the project began, the City's operating budget has become a strong concern. State budget challenges have resulted in the taking away of City funds to balance the State budget. In developing programming and operational plans for the senior and Community Center, every effort has been made to keep operating expenses Iow and maximize revenues wherever possible. From a program perspective, all of the current senior citizen activities will be relocated from the existing Senior Center. While staff anticipates some significant increases in senior participation, no plans are being made for new senior programs at this time. On the Community Center side, almost all the initial programs planned for the facility will be fee-based, cost recovery programs. Not including costs for maintenance, the Community Services Department full year of operation at Central Park Phase 1 is expected to cost $731,640. Revenues in the annual amount of $318,710 are projected. Of the total revenue, $195,000 is projected from facility rentals, primarily from rental of the two main event halls. ...... Senior and Community Center Programming The Senior and Community Center will provide recreational and human services for all age groups from pre-school through senior citizens. Services will be provided through fee-based City programs and partnerships with other organizations. As noted in the budget discussion, the facilities will also be available during non-program times for rental. The Community Services Department will, of course, be relocating all the existing senior programs to the new Center, anticipating a significant increase in participation. Staff will also be offering a number of new and expanded fee-based classes, especially a significant expansion of the Playschool program. Fee-based programs will also be initiated for the new Internet/Computer Room. As part of the project design process and the ongoing program and services planning, staff developed a bullet point list describing a programming and services vision for Phase I of Central Park. This vision is a refinement of the programming and partnership goals that have been identified for the Community Services Department over the past years. This list is attached as Exhibit 2. This vision has served to guide staff in developing plans for the Center. As noted previously, due to budget limitations, staff is not considering any significant expansion of programs or services that would require general fund support. See Exhibit 3 for more detailed list of programs to be offered. Also reference enclosed building floor plan, Exhibit 4, as a reminder of program rooms and spaces. CENTRAL PARK WORKSHOP July 26, 2004 Page 4 YMCA Partnership The Community Services Department has continued to strengthen its programming partnerships with the YMCA over the past few years. During the discussions associated with selling the City-owned property adjacent to the south side of Milliken Park, the City and YMCA informally agreed that the City would lease space in the Central Park Senior/Community Center to the YMCA to help them establish their programming presence ih the Park. There was also an informal agreement that if, and When, the YMCA was able to raise all the funds necessary to build their own program/. administrative building, the City would work with the YMCA to allow them to build their facility at Central Park in the Sports Center portion of the Park. No formal action has occurred regarding these future options. Generally speaking, the City will be leasing space to the YMcA for their administrative staff, a drop-in Teen Program Room and two multi-purpose classrooms. As proposed, the YMCA will be responsible for paying all direct costs associated with their use. The YMCA will concentrate on teen programs, but may also offer other programs in consultation with the Community Services Department. See Exhibit 5 for the proposed Joint Use Agreement, which has been agreed to by City and YMCA staff. Also, see Exhibit 6 for a floor plan highlighting YMCA use areas. Staff will be presenting this Agreement to the City Council for approval consideration in the upcoming weeks. Facility Rentals There has been a tremendous need expressed by community members foi' rental of meeting/event rooms, particularly rooms that would hold at least 200 people. Residents desire rental opportunities which will allow them the flexibility to set up their event the way they want, including using their own caterer, doing their own decorating, etc. The original Park Master Plan for Central Park included community facilities which would have large rooms for rent by non-profit organizations, family and business functions. The Center now under construction has two large event rooms and many smaller meeting rooms, which will be in very high demand. To prepare for these facility rentals, staff has developed a chart showing recommendations of rental priorities for each room and for each type of user group. Generally, staff is suggesting that all user groups have equal advance scheduling privileges for the small and large rooms, while pdvate resident activities get the most advance scheduling rights to the main event halls, followed by business uses. These priorities are recommended to maximize revenue potential in the event halls on weekends to help offset the cost of operating the facilities. See Exhibit 7 for recommended priorities chart. These priorities will be presented to the City Council for consideration at an upcoming meeting. Staff has also prepared a detailed list of recommended user rental fees based on existing City fees and extensive surveys of surrounding cities and businesses. See Exhibit 8 for these recommended fees. These fees will be included in the City's amended fee resolution to be presented to the City Council in August. Background survey information is included in the packet as Exhibit 9. Since different facilities offer CENTRAL PARK WORKSHOP Ju~y 26, 2OO4 Page 5 many varied .kinds of services, it is difficult to conduct a survey of fees that is consistent from facility to facility. In order to assure a valid comparison of fees, staff prepared a fee summary for a typical wedding event for 200 attendees, comparing fees and services of similar nearby facilities. That analysis is attached as Exhibit 10. Staff has projected revenues of $195,000 for a full year of projected operation at Central Park for rental of facilities. This revenue estimate was based on the approval of a policy that would permit consumption of alcoholic beverages, under strict conditions, in the main event halls. The City does currently permit consumption at the Epicenter, 'Senior Center, Civic Center and Chaffey-Gamia House. The current Ordinance does not permit alcoholic beverages at parks. See Exhibit 11 for existing Alcohol Ordinance and Exhibit 12 for existing City policies relating to alcohol use. Staff is not aware of any significant challenges experienced with allowing consumption of alcoholic beverages at currently approved facilities. In preparing policy rebommendations governing alcohOlic beverages in the Senior and Community Center and to understand what other cities permit,, staff conducted reseamh in two methods. First, staff sent out an e-mail listserve short survey to all League of California Cities members asking them if A) they owned a facility which they rent that seats approximately 200 or more people, B) whether they permitted the consumption of alcohol in these facilities and C) a contact name for more information. Of the 39 cities who responded, 34 owned facilities for rental that seat approximately 200 or more. Of · - these 34 cities, 29 permitted alcohol. Exhibit 13 indicates the results of that survey. Secondly, staff conducted a phone survey of nearby cities to obtain more detailed information regarding_whether_they_perm|t~alcohol_and,_if~ so, what some of their policies and issues are. See Exhibit 14 for survey results. City staff has not kept specific records of public inquiries regarding rentals of large meeting rooms. As an estimation, however, supervisory staff surveyed facility coordinators at Lions West, Lions East, the Senior Center, as well as City Hall clerical staff and asked them to conservatively estimate the number of requests they receive. Staff was also asked questions relating to public's catering and decorating desires. Regarding inquiries relating to room rentals, staff estimates they receive between 70-97 requests each month to rent rooms seating over 200 people. Of these, approximately 90% inquire about a facility that permits consumption of alcoholic beverages. Exhibit 15 is a summary of these estimations. As noted, the full year revenue estimate for Central Park for facility rentals is $195,000. As a conservative estimate, approximately 70% of this amount would be lost if alcoholic beverages were not permitted, resulting in a decrease of $136,500 in revenues. This loss of projected revenues would require consideration of additional expenditure reductions in.the City's budget or expanded use of reserve funds. CENTRAL PARK WORKSHOP July 2~, 2004 Page 6 Staff is recommending that the City Council approve the consumption of beer, wine and champagne in the main event halls, governed by strict conditions. Staff's' recommendation is based primarily on the fact that the public has expressed a tremendous desire for many additional large sized event rooms within the community and that the desired uses of these facilities would most often include the serving of beer, wine and champagne. Residents who call community canters to inquire about hall rentals typically are looking for an alternative to hotel/country club ballrooms. Most often, they inquire about whether the City has facilities which allows the rente~ flexibility in using their own caterer, decorator, etc. Additionally, there are a number of arlnual Community activities that would traditionally include these uses, such as the Gala, holiday parties, special receptions and Chamber of Commerce functions. Staff is confident that appropriate procedures can be implemented to minimize negativ, e effects associated with consumption of beer, wine and champagne. Of lesser, but still significant, importance is the opportunity to maximize revenues in order to pay for a quality level of maintenance and programming at Central Park. Based Upon review of policies currently in place in Rancho Cucamonga and in other cities, staff and the Police Department have developed a list of policies and procedures that would be followed if consumption of alcoholic beverages were permitted. The main goals of the proposed policy would be: ,' .~' - A) Limit alcohol to beer, wine and champagne only. B) Limit the rooms where consumption would be permitted. C) Limit the ~ngth of time when consumption would be permitted. D) Provide f¢'r a strong and cost effective security presence' at alcohol events. - - -E) Buildin a-financial commitment for renters to follow the policy. Staff is planning to present the City Council with an amendment to the current City AlcoholOrdinance in the upcoming weeks that would allow the consumption of beer, wine and champagne in the Senior and Community Center. Staff will also soon be presenting the proposed policies that would govern such uses. Copies of these two items are included as Exhibits 16 and 17 respectively. The above discussion has hopefully provided the City Council with valuable background and research information. With City Council concurrence, staff will continue with the approp ate specific actions necessary for Council approvals. Kevin'~ Comm ,~nity Services Director ~AC~MM~ERVV~uncil&B~ards~Ci~uncil~ta~Rep~rt~2~CentralPk~rk~h~New~726~4.d~c THE CITY OF ~ANCIIO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE: March 16, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST BY STEVE AND JOAN KNECHT FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IN RELOCATING DOGS. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council consider the Knecht's request for a 12~month extension of the City Council direction to reduce the number of dogs to be in compliance with the Development Code. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The last action of the City Council was on January 5, 2005; at which time the Knecht's were given 60 days to reduce the number of dogs to be in compliance with the Development Code. If the City Council now wishes to grant the requested 12-month extension, 12 months from the January action would be January 5, 2006. City Planner BB:gs Attachments: Exhibit"A" - Request from Steve and Joan Knecht DATE: February 20, 2005 TO: Brad Buller and Members of the Planning Commission Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Steve and Joan Knecht SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF USE DETERMINATION DR2004-00093 In reference to the above action, dated January 5, 2005, we respectfully request an extension of 12 months to comply with the previous 60 day limit to reduce our number of dogs to 3. We have located a friend to take our dogs. However, this home will not be available until this time. We would prefer to have our dogs go to a loving home rather than place them in a shelter or have them euthanized. Your expeditious consideration in this matter is appreciated. Sincerely, ~/~ oanKnecht ~~ ~t~/e and J~~ ~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FEB 22. 2005 RECEIVED - PLANNING Page 1 of 2 COUNCIL E-MAIL Distributed From: Lynn & Bobbi Cantwell [bobbinlynn@earthlink.net] Sent: March 16, 2005 12:18 PM To: Mayor Subject: Tonight's Council Meeting - Knechts Dear Mr. Mayor, 12 am aware that the Knecht matter is coming up again tonight, l:'m writing you today because r won't be able to attend this meeting, and 1: also wasn't sure you would open comment from the public. Some particulars that 12 hope you will bring up during the council's discussion: 1. Supposedly, the Knecht's neighbors don't mind the breeding kennel in their neighborhood, but 12 don't believe that any of them came to the meetings to speak on behalf of the Knechts, nor has anything been presented to council in writing. Wouldn't you think the Knechts would have at least brought documents to the Council from the neighbors ...... if they actually don't mind?? And, being that the person(s) reporting them remained anonymous, 17d be willing to bet that it was a neighbor. (If 12 wanted to report my neighbor. I'd certainly wish to be anonymous.) 2. There was at least one neighbor that spoke at e council meeting, and he liked the peace and quiet up there, that's why he p0rchased the property. There may be many neighbors that are not aware that this discussion has been going on at the Council meetings, es "neighbors" are not ~ust the person on either side of your residencel 3. The Knechts whining about having to take their dogs to the shelter or have them put to sleep is ludicrous, and nothing but e smoke screen. Valuable purebreds can always be sold to e home of their choice. 12f some ere older dogs, Barbara Marsh from Golden Retriever Rescue spoke one night explaining that they would always be there to help the Knechts, whether it be to advertise the dogs for them on their Golden Retriever website, or to actually take the dogs in end find them 9_.x_Rg&t~jo_n~[I.z good homes. Barbara said she hand-delivered brochures from her organization directly to your offices shortly after that meeting; she indicated that .she provided Rex with two, so that one could be given to the Knechts. To date, she indicates she has never heard from the Knechts. Maybe you could locate your brochure end formally present it to the Knechts at tonight's meeting. 4. According to our Municipal Code, if the Knechts were to purchase 2.§ acres of land, they could then legally apply for a Conditional Use Permit, ~s at least one of our Alta Lame residents has done up et the top of Amethyst that does pet boarding, etc. Thank you for your time and good luck tonight (with Omni-trees & Sanbag, too). (Mrs.) Bobbi ¢ontwell Alta Lama 3/16/2005 MEMO DATE: IVlarch 15, 2005 TO: Mayor Bill Alexander Council members Rex Gutierrez, Dennis Michael, Sam Spagnolo FROM: Diane Williams, Mayor Pro T~ SUBJECT: Reconsideration of Ordinance No, 739 Requiring restaurants to post letter grades The following letter was sent to the editor of the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin and San Bernardino County Sun: I am responding to your editorial of March 11 regarding the ordinance requiring restaurants to post their health department letter grades. The city council did not vote to require the posting of the grades knowing that restaurants with an "A" grade would post them anyway and any others would have incentive to get their grade to an A as soon as possible. There has been a misunderstanding that there will be no more health inspections. That is not the case; all food establishments in Rancho Cucamonga will conUnue to be inspected as before. However, since the misconception exists regarding the matter, at the next city council meeting I will ask to have the ordinance brought back for reconsideration at the April 6 city council meeting. -Diane Williams, Mayor Pro Tern, City of Rancho Cucamonga