Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2005/04/06 - Agenda PacketCITY OF RANCHO' CUCAMONGA 10500 Civic Center Drive + Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730-3801 AGENDAS [] Redevelopment Agency [] - City Council REGULAR MEETINGS Ist and 3r~ Wednesdays + 7:00 p.m. APRIL 6, 2005 AGENCY~ BOARD & CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS William J. Alexander .................... Mayor Diane Williams ............... Mayor Pro Tem Rex Gutierrez ............................ Member L. Dennis Michael ...................... Member Sam Spagnolo ......................... Member Jack Lam ......................... City Manager James L. Markman ............. City Attorney Debra J. Adams ..................... City Clerk 5:30 p.m. 7:00 p.m. ORDER OF BUSINESS Closed Session .................... Tapia Conference Room Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting... Council Chambers Regular City Council Meeting ............. Council Chambers INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC RANCHO CUCAMONGA TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL The City Council encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the Agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the City Council on any agenda item. Please sign in on the clipboard located at the desk behind the staff table. It is important to list your name, address and phone number. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under "Public Communications". There is opportunity to speak under this section at the beginning and the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the City Council should be given to the City Clerk for distribution. To address the City Council, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. All items to be placed on a City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, one week prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's office receives all such items. AGENDA BACK-UP MATERIALS Staff reports and back-up materials for agenda items are available for review at the City Clerk's counter and the Public Library. A complete copy of the agenda is also available at the sign in desk located behind the staff table during the Council meeting. LIVE BROADCAST Council meetings are broadcast live on Channel 3 for those with cable television access. Meetings are rebroadcast on the second and fourth Wednesdays of each month at 11:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. The City has added the option for customers without cable access to view the meetings "on-demand" from their computers. The added feature of "Streaming Video On Demand" is available on the City's website at www.ci.rancho- cucamonga.ca.uslwhatsnew.htm for those with Hi-bandwidth (DSL/Cable Modem) or Low-bandwidth (Dial-up) Internet service. The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers Located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Members of the City Council also sit as the Redevelopment Agency and the Fire District Board. Copies of City Council agendas and minutes can be found at http:llwww, ci. rancho-cucamonga.ca, us If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please I~ contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477-2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the LI meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session.  CITY COUNCIL AGENDA APmL 6, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY (.~,]~,~CHO HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE UC~MONGA I[ A. CALL TO ORDER 1. Roll Call: Alexander__, Gutierrez__, Michael__, Spagnolo__, and Williams__. II B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS 1. Presentation of a Proclamation declaring April as "Child Abuse Prevention Month." 2. Presentation of a Proclamation declaring April 10-16 as "National Crime Victims' Rights Week." 3. Presentation of a Proclamation declaring April 10-16 as "National Library Week." I[ C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember or member of the audience for discussion. 1. Approval of Minutes: March 2, 2005 March 14, 2005 (Special Study Session) March 16, 2005 (Special Workshop) March 16, 2005 2. Approval of Warrants, Register March 9 through March 29, 2005, and Payroll ending March 29, 2005, for the total amount of $6,032,081.81. 7 3. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for 37 the construction of the "Foothill Boulevard Storm Drain Improvements and Pavement Rehabilitation from Ramona Avenue to Hermosa Avenue," to be funded from Acct. No. 10250015650/1506025-1 (General Fund).  CITY COUNCIL AGENDA APRIL 6, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS~ CITY 2 (~,~tMqCHO HALL, 10500 C~WC CENTER DRIVE UCAMONG^ RESOLUTION NO. 05-117 A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE "FOOTHILL BOULEVARD STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS AND PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM RAMONA AVENUE TO HERMOSA AVENUE" IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS 4. Approval of plans and specifications for the "Rancho Cucamonga Family Sports Center Generator Enclosure" and authorize the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids," to be funded from Capital Reserves Acct. No. 1025001-5602 as approved in the FY 2004/05 budget. RESOLUTION NO. 05-118 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "RANCHO CUCAMONGA FAMILY SPORTS CENTER GENERATQR ENCLOSURE" AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS 5. Approval of plans and specifications for the "Lake Pump Equipment Vault at Red Hill Community Park," and authorize the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids," to be funded from PD 85 Acct. No. 1848303-5650/1224848-0 as approved in the FY 2004/05 budget. RESOLU'~ION NO. 05-119 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "LAKE PUMP EQUIPMENT VAULT AT RED HILL COMMUNITY PARK" AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS Approval of plans, specifications and estimates and to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the "Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail Construction from Amethyst Avenue to Archibald Avenue (Phase II)," to be funded from Acct. No. 11103165650/1520110. 40 45 48 52 55 59  CITY COUNCIL AGENDA APRIL 6, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS~ CITY ,.~ ,...,~&~C O HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE !.;L'GAMONGA 10. RESOLUTION NO. 05-120 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC INLAND EMPIRE TRAIL CONSTRUCTION FROM AMETHYST AVENUE TO ARCHIBALD AVENUE (PHASE II), IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS Approval of final Tract Map 16279 located on the north and south sides of Highland Avenue between Etiwanda and East Avenues, submitted by Toll Brothers Land Development- APN: 227-472-28 RESOLUTION NO. 05-121 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 16279 Approval of a change order in an amount of $210,800.00 for the installation of additional transformers, switches, and service line extensions for Victoria Gateway, Foothill Crossing and Victoria Gardens for new hookups, and approval to increase the award to the Pouk & Steinle Contract (CO 03-127) by an amount of $210,800.00 from Acct. No. 17053035650/1382705-0. Approval of a request to SummarilYthVacate Excess Street Right-of- Way located on the south half of 7 Street, east of the cul-de-sac terminus of 7th Street and east of Archibald Avenue, V-199 - APN: 209-211-46. RESOLUTION NO. 05-122 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF EXCESS STREET EASEMENT RIGHT-OF-WAY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH HALF OF 7TM STREET, EAST OF THE CUL- DE-SAC TERMINUS OF 7TM STREET AND EAST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 7 for 5938 Etiwanda Avenue, located north of Banyan Street, submitted by Pacific Crest Communities, Inc. 62 67 69 70 72 77  CITY COUNCIL AGENDA APRIL 6, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY 4 {.~RANcHO HALL, 10500 C~WC CENTER DRIVE UCJtMONGA 11. 12. 13. RESOLUTION NO. 05-123 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR 5938 ETIWANDA AVENUE RESOLUTION NO. 05-124 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7 FOR 5938 ETIWANDA AVENUE Approval to award an annual contract for the purchase of asphalt materials from Holliday Rock (CO 05-024) in the amount of $80,000, to be funded from Acct. No. 1001316-5200 for the remainder of Fiscal Year 2004/2005, with the option to renew for Fiscal Year 2006/2007. Approval of a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement (CO 05~025) from John C. and Stephanie J. Larson for the property located at 8887 Hidden Farm Road (APN: 1061-271-26- 0000). RESOLUTION NO. 05-125 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A REAL PROPERTY CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM JOHN C. AND STEPHANIE J. LARSON AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 14496-1, located on the northwest corner of Wi[son Avenue and Day Creek Boulevard, submitted by Granite Homes. RESOLUTION NO. 05-126 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 14496-1 79 80 88 89 91 92 95  CITY COUNCIL AGENDA APRIL 6, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY 5 ¢,a~cBO HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE UGAMONG^ 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 16370, located on the northwest corner of Church Street and Arbor Lane, submitted by US Homes Corporation. RESOLUTION NO. 05-127 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 16370 Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 16371, located on the southwest corner of Victoria Park Lane and Base Line Road, submitted by US Homes Corporation. RESOLUTION NO. 05-128 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 16371 Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for TR 16432, located th at the southwest corner of 19 Street and Amethyst Street, submitted by Cucamonga Ventures, LLC. RESOLUTION NO. 05-129 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TR 16432 Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Guarantee Letter of Credit, and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for DRC2001-00805, located at 10863 and 10865 Jersey Boulevard, submitted by Ralph Karubian, Sol Stone, Marcia Stone, Charles Karubian and Laurence Karubian. RESOLUTION NO. 05-130 A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2001-00805 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK Approval to release the Maintenance Guarantee cash deposit for DRC2002-00187, located on the west side of Center Avenue, south of 7t~ Street, submitted by 9101 Center Avenue Associates, LLC. 96 99 100 103 104 107 108 110 111  , CITY COUNCIL AGENDA APRIL 6, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY 6 (..~,~NCHO HALL, 10500 CIWC CENTER DRIVE UCAMONG^ 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. Approval to accept Improvements, release all bonds and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for Tract 12959-1 (Railroad Crossings), located at the southeast corner of White Oak Avenue and Arrow Route, submitted by Cappelino & Associates. RESOLUTION NO. 05-131 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 12959-1 (RAILROAD CROSSINGS) AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for Tract 15724, located on the south side of Terra Vista Parkway, east of Coyote Canyon Park, submitted by KB Homes Greater Los Angeles, Inc. RESOLUTION NO. 05-132 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 15724 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond No. SS4081 in the amount of $613,419.25 for the Phase lA of Community Facilities District 2001-01, Contract No. 02-075. Approval to release the Faithful Performance Bond, No. CD 6003, in the amount of $128,128.00 for the Etiwanda Avenue Bike Lane and Sidewalk Improvement, Contract No. 03-047. Approval to accept the Improvements in Phase 3A of Community Facilities District 2003-01, including Street, Storm Drain, Water Main, Traffic Signals and Fiber Optic Conduits, Contract No. 03-135 as complete, retain the Faithful Performance Bond as a Guarantee Bond, release the Labor and Material Bond and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $2,899,109.03. 113 115 116 118 119 121 123  CITY COUNCIL AGENDA APmL 6, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. T.E CO NC,L C.A..ER . 7 (..},~.~RAI~MCOHI~GA HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE 24. 25. RESOLUTION NO. 05-133 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE IMPROVEMENTS IN PHASE 3A OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2003-01, INCLUDING STREET, STORM DRAIN, WATER MAIN, TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND FIBER OPTIC CONDUITS, CONTRACT NO. 03-135 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK Approval to accept the Landscaping and Sidewalk in Phase lA of Community Facilities District 2001-01, Contract No. 04-011 as complete, approval to appropriate $37,051.51 to Acct. No. 16123035650/1442612-0 from CFD 2001-01 I Fund balance, retain the Faithful Performance Bond as a Guarantee Bond, release the Labor and Materials Bond, and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $946,815.75. RESOLUTION NO. 05-134 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE LANDSCAPING AND SIDEWALK IN PHASE lA OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2001- 01, CONTRACT NO. 04-011 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK Approval to accept Phases lB(B), 3B(A), and 3B(B) of CFD's 2001-01 and 2003-01 for Street, Storm Drain and related improvements on Foothill Boulevard, Contract No. 04-041 as complete, retain the Faithful Performance Bond as a Guarantee Bond, release the Labor and Material Bond and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $1,695,814.62. RESOLUTION NO. 05-135 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PHASES lB(B), 3B(A) AND 3B(B) OF CFD'S 2001-01 AND 2003-01 FOR STREET, STORM DRAIN AND RELATED IMPROVEMENTS ON FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, CONTRACT NO. 04- 041 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 126 127 130 131 134  CITY COUNCIL AGENDA APRIL 6, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY 8 ..~I~NCHO HALL, 10500 C~WC CENTER DRIVE 26. Approval for the replacement purchase of one (1) hazardous 135 materials vehicle from KME Fire Apparatus of Ontario, CA, in the amount of $293,301.97, to be funded from Acct. Nos. 1380501-5604 (Depadment of Homeland Security Grant) $144,986.00 and 2505801- 5604 (Fire Protection-RDA Capital Outlay- Vehicle) $178,315.97. [[ E. CONSENT ORDINANCES l The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non- controversial. The Council will act upon them at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion. No Items Submitted. IIF. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS ] The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony, 1. RECONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE THAT ADOPTS BY 136 REFERENCE COUNTY ORDINANCE 3930 RELATING TO THE INSPECTION GRADING OF FOOD ESTABLISHMENTS ORDINANCE NO. 739 (second reading) '145 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING, BY REFERENCE, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ORDINANCE NO. 3930 RELATING TO INSPECTION GRADING OF FOOD ESTABLISHMENTS AND AMENDING TITLE 8 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE  CITY COUNCIL AGENDA APRIL 6, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY 9 R~CHD HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE ~UCAMONGA ~. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. 1. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF 227 THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REVISING REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO POSSESSION AND CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES WITHIN CITY PARKS, AND AMENDING TITLE 12 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE ORDINANCE NO. 741 (second reading) 228 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REVISING REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO POSSESSION AND CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES WITHIN CITY PARKS, AND AMENDING TITLE 12 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. 1. UPDATE REGARDING 210 FREEWAY LANDSCAPING 231 The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. 1. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Councilmember.) 2. APPROVAL OF POLICIES AND PROCEDURES GOVERNING THE SERVING OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES BY FACILITY RENTAL 232 GROUPS IN THE SENIOR AND COMMUNITY CENTER AT CENTRAL PARK ,~ CITY COUNCIL AGENDA APRIL 6, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY ]. 0 (~,~ANCHO HALL, 10500 CIWC CENTER DRIVE L'CAMONGA 3. FOLLOW-UP ON CITY COUNCIL REQUEST FOR INFORMATION ON MICROCHIPPING SERVICES AND ENHANCED VETERINARY CARE AT THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA ANIMAL SHELTER (Oral report from Dan Avera, Deputy Director of Public Health, County of San Bernardino). 4. CONSIDERATION OF A PROPOSAL BY NATHAN WlNOGRAD OF 239 "NO-KILL SOLUTIONS" TO PROVIDE CONSULTATION SERVICES TO THE CITY REGARDING THE FEASIBILITY OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA ANIMAL SHELTER BECOMING A NO- KILL SHELTER 5. DISCUSSION OF PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSION (Oral) 6. LEGISLATIVE UPDATE (Oral) I, Debts J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on March 31,2005, seventy two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. March 2, 2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION MINUTES [ A. C=L TO OmER [ The Rancho Cucamonga City Council held a closed session on Wednesday, March 2, 2005, in the Tapia Room of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 5:30 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander. Present were Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, L. Dennis Michael, Sam Spagnolo, Diane Williams and Mayor William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; and O'Neil, City Engineer. B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) Mayor Alexander announced the closed session item. B1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING LITIGATION PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V. 1-15 RANCHO PACIFIC, LLC, CASE NO. RCV 083510, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, REGARDING CONDEMNATION ACTION FOR PROPERTY INTERESTS ON REAL PROPERTY OWNED BY 1-15 RANCHO PACIFIC LLC, APN: 229-021-58; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOSEPH O/NElL, CITY ENGINEER, AND CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE REGARDING SETTLEMENT NEGOTIATIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING SETTLEMENT OFFER; NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH A PARTY IN THE MATTER, FOOTHILL CROSSING, LLC - CITY II C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) No communication was made on the closed session item. I[ D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION I The closed session began at 5:35 p.m. E. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS F. RECESS The closed session recessed at 6:55 p.m. with no action taken. City Council Minutes March 2, 2005 Page 2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Reqular Meetinfl [[ A. CALL TO ORDER [ A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, March 2, 2005, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor William J. Alexander called the meeting to order at 7:12 p.m. Present were Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, L. Dennis Michael, Sam Spagnolo, Diane Williams and Mayor William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Director; George Rivera, Administrative Services Manager; Claudia Nunez, Risk Management Coordinator; Joe Kamrani, Sr. Information Systems Analyst; Charles Scott, Sr. Information Systems Specialist; Shelly Munson, Information Systems Specialist; Jon Gillespie, Traffic Engineer; Mike TenEyck, Administrative Resource Manager; Bob Zetterberg, Waste Management Coordinator; Brad Buller, City Planner; Trang Huynh, Building Official; Mark Salazar, Code Enforcement Supervisor; Alison Rowlen, Code Enforcement Officer; Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director; Dave Moore, Recreation Superintendent; Francie Palmer, Marketing Manager; Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III; Deborah Clark, Library Director; Captain Pete Ortiz, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; Chief Peter Bryan, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Kimberly Thomas, Management Analyst III; Kathy Scott, Deputy City Clerk; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk l[ .. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS I B1. Presentation of a Certificate of Recognition to the City from the Public Agency Risk Sharing Authority of California (PARSAC). Joanne Rennie, General Manager, Public Agency Risk Sharing Authority of California (PARSAC) presented the Certificate of Recognition to George Rivera, Administrative Services Manager. B2. Announcement by Tim Johnson of County Supervisor Paul Biane's Office regarding C.I.P. Funding. San Bernardino County Supervisor Paul Biane presented information what he is doing to help Rancho Cucamonga. II c. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS I C1. A man (who did not identify himself) inquired about the City's plans to mitigate the 210 freeway noise. Mayor Alexander stated this matter is not on the agenda tonight, but referred him to the City Engineer to address his concerns. City Council Minutes March 2, 2005 Page 3 Jon Gillespie, Traffic Engineer, asked that the gentleman contact Engineering tomorrow to get his concerns addressed. 02. Ray Jimenez, Pasito Avenue, addressed the City Council about flooding in his neighborhood. He asked that the water be diverted into a catch basin. He stated he heard that there was a home for delinquent boys approved near his home and that he is concerned about vandalism. Mayor Alexander stated the City Council cannot comment on this tonight, but that it would be agendized for a future meeting. C3. Nicole Myerchin reminded the City Council about the Animeals Program and how it helps the seniors take care of their pets. She thanked Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst Ill, for getting the Pet Finder on the Internet and also thanked Mayor Alexander and Councilmember Spagnolo for their help. She stated she is concerned about emergency response times. C4. John Lyons said his thoughts and prayers go out to Grace Curatalo. He commented on the new agenda format stating the second Public Communications has been taken off and the City Council comments have been limited to three minutes. He referred a meeting held last Thursday between the City Council and Congressman Dreier. He felt Councilmember Williams was out of line how she was talking to the Congressman. C5. Leslie Grimes felt it was good to go after the Congressman for things that can help the City. She stated she is concerned about the item removed from the agenda regarding SANBAG and Omnitrans and that she has still not come to terms with this. She did not agree with the previous process that took place to remove the Mayor from these positions and that this concerns her. She encouraged people to attend the next meeting to get answers why the Mayor is being eliminated from his seat. She stated the M.S. Challenge is coming up again and encouraged people to help their favorite charity whatever it might be. C6. Bill McCliman felt Nicole Myerchin has done a fabulous job bringing forth issues that people care about. He asked that the City Council bring forth the same values. He felt it was pathetic that the City Council voted down a raise for the firemen. He felt the firemen should get the same raise that other City employees get. He stated the City Council is only the caretaker of the City. He asked that the Council stick by their values. He asked when the Blue Ribbon Commission would be brought back to a Council meeting, and indicated he would like to see this come back at the next meeting. Jack Lam, City Manager stated there has been no vote on any contract, but that contract negotiations are currently pending. He stated there are salary negotiations pending and there are salary offers out there. He stated they have not been accepted by the Union at this point. He stated there has been no vote to deny any contract. C7. Jessica Shuller commented on the Relay for Life Walk to take place at Los Osos High School on May 21-22, 2005. She indicated Fay Valone at Los Osos High School could be contacted if the Council would like to get involved. C8. Steve Knecht stated they are asking for a one-year extension to get his dogs relocated. (See information on file in the City Clerk's office.) Brad Buller, City Planner, stated this would need to be agendized for the next meeting in order for the Council to take any action. Councilmember Gutierrez asked that this be placed on the next agenda. C9. Robert Bean, student at Los Osos High School, commented on the parking of cars near the High School. He stated there is vandalism and it is unsafe for pedestrians. He asked that the City Council consider this for the future. City Council Minutes March 2, 2005 Page 4 II D. CONSENT CALENDAR [ D1. Approval of Warrants, Register 2~8~05 through 2/23/05 and Payroll ending 2/23/05, for the total amount of $5,072,622.52. D2. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Construction of the Base Line Road Storm Drain Improvements and Pavement Rehabilitation from Ramona Avenue to Hermosa Avenue, to be funded from Acct. No. 11123035650/1465112 (Drainage Funds) and Acct. No. 11763035650/1465176 (Measure 'T' Funds). RESOLUTION NO. 05-072 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BASE LINE ROAD STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS AND PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM RAMONA AVENUE TO HERMOSA AVENUE AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS D3. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Construction of the Sapphire Street Pavement Rehabilitation from 19th Street to Banyan Street, to be funded from Acct. No. 11763035650/1471176-0 (Measure "1" Funds). RESOLUTION NO. 05-073 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE SAPPHIRE STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM 19TM STREET TO BANYAN STREET AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS D4. Approval of a reimbursement of $103,552.00 from CFD 2003-01 Fund Balance, Acct. No. 16143035650/1442614-0, to Forest City California Commercial Construction, and appropriate $103,552.00 to Acct. No. 16143035650/1442614-0 from CFD 2003-01 (Fund 614) Fund Balance. D5. Approval to appropriate $10,000 from Fund 016 into Acct. No. 1016301-5300 (Contract Services) to fund backfile conversion services (digitizing permanent records) for Community Development departments. D6. Approval of an additional emergency expenditure of $150,000 for ongoing storm related, emergency recovery effort work being performed by various contractors (Laird Construction, Babco Construction, A.W. Davies Construction, and JDC), to be funded from Acct. No. 10250015300, and approval of an additional appropriation of $150,000 to Acct. No. 10250015300 from Fund 25 (Capital Reserve) Fund Balance. D7. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities, Monumentation Cash Deposit and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for Parcel Map 16323, located on the east side of Haven Avenue, south of 6th Street, submitted by Ledesma & Meyer Development Company, Inc., a California Corporation. RESOLUTION NO. 05-074 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP 16323, City Council Minutes March 2, 2005 Page 5 IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT RESOLUTION NO. 05-075 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR PARCEL MAP 16323 DS. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for Parcel Map 16815, located on the north side of Mission Park Drive between Richmond Place and Buffalo Avenue, submitted by Rancho Mills, LLC, a Limited Liability Corporation. RESOLUTION NO. 05-076 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 16815, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY RESOLUTION NO. 05-077 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR PARCEL MAP 16815 D9. Approval to award designated contracts to the specified subcontractors for the Construction of the Rancho Cucamonga Cultural Center Project totaling, $1,066,505 and authorize the expenditure of a 5% contingency for each contract, totaling $53,325, to be funded from the following sources: State Library Grant Funds Acct. No. 1310602-5650/1357310-6314 ($269,605); Tax Allocation Bonds 2001 Acct. No. 2650801-5650/1357650-6314 ($386,590); and Library Fund Acct. No. 1290601-5650/1388290-6314 ($463,635), and authorize the appropriation of $386,590 from Tax Allocation Bonds 2001 Fund Balance into Acct. No. 2650801-5650/1357650-6314 and $463,635 from Library Fund Balance into Acct. No. 1290601-5650/1388290-6314. D10. Approval of the Professional Services Agreement with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (CO 05- 016) in the amount of $29,958.00 and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $3,002.00 to provide fiscal year 2004/2005 Traffic Signal Design Services for proposed capital improvement projects at various locations within the City, to be funded from Acct. Nos. 1124-303- 5650/1473-124-0 ($6,590.00), 1124-303-5650/1474-124-0 ($6,590.00), 1124-303-5650/1475-124-0 ($6,590.00), 1124-303-5650/1509-124-0 ($6,590.00 and 1176-303-5650/1508-176-0 ($6,600.00), and approval of appropriation of $6,590.00 to Acct. No. 1124-303-5650/1509-124-0 from Transportation (Fund 124) Fund Balance and an appropriation of $6,600.00 to Acct. No. 1176-303-5650/1508-176-0 from Measure "1" (Fund 176) Fund Balance. D11. Approval of an agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) (CO 05-017) to share the cost of the demolition and the site clean-up of the burned Packing House, demolition of three miscellaneous buildings, the pope barn, concrete and asphalt demolition on the sites, and removal of hazardous materials -APN: 0227-121-18 and 51. D12. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for DRC2002-00499, located at the southwest corner of 6th Street and Fairway View Place, submitted by KSL Rancho Cucamonga, L.P. City Council Minutes March 2, 2005 Page 6 RESOLUTION NO. 05-078 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DRC2002-00499 D13. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 14771, located on the north side of Ringstem Avenue, east of Haven Avenue, submitted by Toll Brothers. RESOLUTION NO. 05-079 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 14771 D14. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 16279, located on the nodh and south sides of realignment Highland Avenue, between Etiwanda and East Avenues, submitted by Toll Brothers. RESOLUTION NO. 05~080 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 16279 D15. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 16279-1, located on the north and south sides of Highland Avenue, between Etiwanda and East Avenues, submitted by Toll Brothers. RESOLUTION NO. 05-081 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 16279-1 D16. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Parcel Map 16365, located on the northwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Foothill Boulevard, submitted by Regency Realty Group, Inc. RESOLUTION NO. 05-082 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR PARCEL MAP 16365 D17. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 16369, located on the northeast corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Church Street, submitted by Standard Pacific Corporation. RESOLUTION NO. 05-083 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 16369 City Council Minutes March 2, 2005 Page 7 D18. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 16612, located on the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Church Street, submitted by D.R. Horton Los Angeles Holding Co., Inc. RESOLUTION NO. 05-084 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 16612 D19. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Cash Deposit and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for CUP 99-56, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, west of Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by Roman Catholic Bishop of San Bernardino. RESOLUTION NO. 06-085 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR CUP 99-56 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D20. Approval to accept Improvements, retain the Faithful Performance Bond in lieu of a Maintenance Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for DRC2001-00437, located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Town Center Drive, submitted by Exxon Mobil Oil Corporation. RESOLUTION NO. 05-086 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2001-00437 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D21. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Cash Deposit and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for Parcel Map 16057, located on the south side of Feron Street, east of Reid Street, submitted by Northtown Housing Development Corp. RESOLUTION NO. 05-087 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 16057 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D22. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Cash Deposit and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for Parcel Map 16058, located on the west side of Reid Street, south of Feron Street, submitted by Northtown Housing Development Corp. RESOLUTION NO. 05-088 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 16058 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK City Council Minutes March 2, 2005 Page 8 D23. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for parcel Maps 16123, 16124 and 16125, located on the east side of haven Avenue south of Arrow Route and on the west side of Monroe Court cul-de-sac, nodh of Jersey Boulevard, submitted by Haven Partners, LLC. RESOLUTION NO. 05-089 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAPS 16123, 16124 AND 16125 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D24. Approval to accept Improvements, retain the Faithful Performance Bond in lieu of a Maintenance Bond and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for Tract 14875, located at the southeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Church Street, submitted by Ambling West, LLC. RESOLUTION NO. 05-090 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 14875 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D25. Approval of Faithful Performance Bond No. 08674637 in the amount of $133,655.00 for the Lemon Avenue Street Rehabilitation from Beryl Street to Amethyst Avenue, Contract No. 03-022. D26. Approval to release the Faithful Performance Bond No. 69539057 in the amount of $49,300.00 for the Heritage Park Storage Shed, Contract No. 03-045. D27. Approval to accept the Rochester Avenue, north of Highland and Haven Avenue, north of 19th Street Landscaping Project, Contract No. 04-077 as complete, retain the Faithful Performance Bond as a Guarantee Bond, release the Labor and Material Bond and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $294,773.33. RESOLUTION NO. 05-091 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE ROCHESTER AVENUE, NORTH OF HIGHLAND AVENUE AND HAVEN AVENUE, NORTH OF 19TM STREET, LANDSCAPING PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. 04-077 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D28. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond No. 83SB104168826 BCM in the amount of $13,724.26 for the Milliken Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation from 6th Street to 7th Street, Contract No. 03- 101. D29. Approval to accept the Highland Avenue Landscape Improvements east of Day Creek Boulevard, Contract No. 04-160 as complete, retain the Faithful Performance Bond as a Guarantee Bond, release the labor and Material Bond, and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amouht of $87,342.50. City Council Minutes March 2, 2005 Page 9 RESOLUTION NO. 05-092 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE HIGHLAND AVENUE LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS EAST OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD, CONTRACT NO. 04-160 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK MOTION: Moved by Michael, seconded by Williams to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports contained within the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. ][ E. CO SS T Om I A CSS ] No Items Submitted. II F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS ] Fl. CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT AN ORDINANCE THAT ADOPTS BY REFERENCE COUNTY ORDINANCE 3930 RELATING TO THE INSPECTION GRADING OF FOOD ESTABLISHMENTS (CONTINUED FROM FEBRUARY 2, 2005) A staff report was presented by Kimberly Thomas, Management Analyst Ill. Terry Williams, San Bernardino County Health Department (SBCHD), also presented information about the grading process. Councilmember Michael inquired what other counties have for their grading systems. Terry Williams, (SBCHD), stated that most counties have the ABC grading. Councilmember Michael asked the percentage of restaurants that have A ratings in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Terry Williams, (SBCHD), stated about 80% have A's. Councilmember Gutierrez commented about the California Restaurant's Association not favoring this system. He asked what kind of violations is noted and if there are any other than food violations. Terry Williams, (SBCHD), displayed a list of possible violations. Councilmember Gutierrez asked what someone could do to debate the grade they received. Terry Williams, (SBCHD), stated they have an in-house hearing process, but that most violations noted are very clear and are not challenged by people. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council were: Steve Timberman asked why are we wasting our tax dollars on this item. He did not feel the government should be involved in this. City Council Minutes March 2, 2005 Page 10 John Lyons stated he asked various restaurant owners how they felt about putting the letter grade in their window. He commented on why some of the restaurant owners get a B rating. He did not think it needed to be posted in the windows. A man (did not give his name) stated when people see a B rating they do wonder if they will get sick by eating there. He asked that the City Council vote no on this ordinance. Nicole Myerchin felt having ratings is a good thing and that it helps people to make an educated decision. She stated it helps restaurants to improve their conditions. Anthony Artono, Los Osos High School, stated he does not eat in his school cafeteria. He felt the agenda was wasting trees by printing them for everyone. He felt the Council should be considering issues that were important to help generate revenue. Amber Novara, Los Osos High School, commented on the book, The Jungle, as it relates to generating revenue. There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed. Terry Williams, (SBCHD), stated school cafeterias are inspected and scored, but are not posted, but felt they could be. She stated San Bernardino County has a very high record. Councilmember Michael stated he is concerned about the quality of food and if it is healthy. He suggested the County notify the restaurant that they are coming into their establishment so they can get ready for the inspection, and if that isn't possible, why not allow them a ten day period before they have to post a bad grade. This would allow them time to correct any violations noted. Terry Williams, (SBCHD), it has been agreed upon, both nationally and state wide, to do unannounced inspections. Councilmember Michael felt a business should have ten days to fix something before they have to post a B grade. Councilmember Williams stated the issue is not should a restaurant be inspected, but rather should the restaurant be forced to hang their grade in the window. She felt this could be very detrimental to a business to hang a B in their window. She stated the A's will automatically post their grades in the window. ORDINANCE NO. 739 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING, BY REFERENCE, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ORDINANCE NO. 3930 RELATING TO INSPECTION GRADING OF FOOD ESTABLISHMENTS AND AMENDING TITLE 8 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE ACTION: Since there was no motion made to adopt Ordinance No. 739, the Mayor suggested the City stay with the existing standard and not adopt the County Ordinance. He stated this matter would die to lack of a motion. F2. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHC~ CUCAMONGA AMENDING ELECTRIC RATES, FEES AND CHARGES PURSUANT TO THF REQUIREMENTS AND AUTHORITY OF CHAPTER 3.46 OF TITLE 3 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE A staff report was presented by Mike TenEyck, Administrative Resource Manager. City Council Minutes March 2, 2005 Page 11 Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. RESOLUTION NO. 05-093 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING RATES, FEES AND CHARGES PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS AND AUTHORITY OF CHAPTER 3.46 OF TITLE 3 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Michael to approve Resolution No. 05-093. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. I[ ~. PUBLIC HEARINGS I Gl. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ADDING CHAPTER 19.20 TO TITLE 19 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAl CODE PERTAINING TO THE PROTECTION AND REGULATION OF THE CITY'S MUNICIPAl SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM (MS4) AS REQUIRED BY STATE AND FEDERAL LAW A staff report and power point presentation (on file in the City Clerk's office) were presented by Bob Zetterberg, Integrated Waste Coordinator. James Markman, City Attorney, stated this is being mandated to get the storm waters clean before it goes into the ocean. He stated this is a "no choice" matter. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public input. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 740. ORDINANCE NO. 740 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 19.20 TO TITLE 19 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO THE PROTECTION AND REGULATION OF THE CITY'S MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM (MS4) MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Williams to waive full reading and set second reading of Ordinance No. 740 for the March 16, 2005 meeting. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. [I H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS I H1. CENTRAL PARK UPDATE (Oral) A staff report and power point presentation (on file in the City Clerk's office) were given by Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director and Dave Moore, Recreation Superintendent. City Council Minutes March 2, 2005 Page 12 Councilmember Williams asked how the seniors will get from the parking lot to the Senior Center building. Dave Moore, Recreation Superintendent, stated they are working this issue out in order to assist them. Councilmember Williams stated she would like to have the issue of serving alcohol at the Senior Center on the next agenda. She stated she would like information prepared for operating the old Senior Center compared to the new Senior Center. She felt if the sale of alcohol is vital to the success of the center, she would ask her fellow City Councilmembers that voted with her against alcohol to reconsider this again. She asked for real numbers so that she can reconsider her vote. Mayor Alexander stated he had already asked that this be on the agenda and is glad to hear this. Councilmember Gutierrez felt this was a very good issue to talk about. He stated he is very concerned about th'e senior access to the center as well. ACTION: Report received and filed. H2. CODE ENFORCEMENT UPDATE (Oral) A staff report and power point presentation (on file in the City Clerk's office) were presented by Mark Salazar, Code Enforcement Supervisor, and Alison Rowlen, Code Enforcement Officer. ACTION: Report received and filed. [] I. COUNCIL BUSINESS ] I1. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Councilmember) Councilmember Michael commented on a previous meeting the Council had to discuss organizational effectiveness. He stated one of the items discussed was the agenda format. He stated that Council Comments were moved to the end of the agenda, and that the second Public Communications has been removed. He stated he toured the animal shelter. He advised that he and Councilmember Spagnolo will be going to Washington, D.C. to meet with legislators about issues concerning the City. Councilmember Gutierrez expressed his appreciation to Supervisor Biane for the good things he is doing for the City. He appreciated being put on the Etiwanda Preserve Committee. He felt this is very important to preserve open space. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated Nathan Winograd has been asked to speak at 6:00 p.m. at Lions Park Community Center West on March 14. He stated earlier in the meeting he corrected a gentleman about some information he was talking about. He stated the City does not do this to be argumentative, but did not feel incorrect information should left with the public. He stated this is done to make sure the public has the facts correct. He stated anyone can call the City if they have questions. 12. RECONSIDERATION OF APPOINTMENTS TO OMNITRANS AND SANBAG (Oral) Mayor Alexander asked that this item be removed from the agenda and brought back at the March 16, 2005 meeting. 13. LEGISLATIVE UPDATE (Oral) Councilmember Williams stated the City has received word from Congressman Dreier about funding for improvements on Base Line and the 115 Interchange. She stated the CDBG Program and the COPS City Council Minutes March 2, 2005 Page 13 Program may be eliminated because of funding being eliminated. She stated this is critical to all cities. She encouraged people to write to their legislators about not getting rid of this money II J. ADJOURNMENT I MOTION: Moved by Williams seconded by Gutierrez to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 9:36 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Approved: * Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk March 14, 2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL STUDY SESSION MINUTES A. CALL TO ORDER The Rancho Cucamonga City Council held a special study session on Monday, March 14, 2005, at the Lions Park Community Center West (Brookside Room) located at 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 6:08 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander Present were Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, L. Dennis Michael, Sam Spagnolo, Diane Williams and Mayor William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager; Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst IIh and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk I B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS B1. Kelly Heillig thanked the Council for having this meeting. She also thanked Mr. Winograd. She asked when the next update on various issues concerning the animal shelter would be. She also commented on the animals that are sick at the shelter. B2. Nicole Myerchin thanked Mr. Winograd and the Council for taking their time to have this meeting. B3. Pat Dunaway, Pet Assistance Foundation, was hoping that Mr. Winograd could answer some of her questions regarding the figures pertaining to euthanasia. B4. A lady (who did not identify herself) stated she was glad for the meeting tonight. B5. Rusha Blakely stated Mr. Winograd is a legend with regards to changing animal shelters. She hoped the Council will implement Mr. Winograd's suggestions. B6. Bill McCliman stated all of this is possible because of Nicole Myerchin and other residents of Rancho Cucamonga. He thanked the City Council for having this meeting. B7. Mary Catalano from Los Angeles, stated she appreciates that all of these people came here for this meeting. She felt Rancho Cucamonga could be the role model for the nation because of the work they are doing. B8. Elton Courie stated he is an animal lover. He talked about signatures he and Vicky Shore had gathered in favor of a "no kill" shelter. B9. A lady (who did not identify herself) talked about the poor conditions of the Riverside Shelter. She also stated she does rescuing. Il C. ITEM(S) OF BUS1NESS [ C1. PRESENTATION BY NATHAN WINOGRAD - "NO KILL SOLUTIONS" A power point presentation was given by Nathan Winograd (which is on file in the City Clerk's office). Councilmember Michael asked what "no kill" means. City Council Special Study Session Minutes March 14, 2005 Page 2 Mr. Winograd stated the first goal is to have safe, healthy dogs and cats and the second element is to save the sick and injured animals and provide care to them. Councilmember Michael asked who makes the determination if a dog is vicious and should be put down. Mr. Winograd stated shelter staff evaluate the temperament of dog~. Councilmember Williams asked if this is a two-phase program. Mr. Winegrad stated yes and felt the first step is to put in place an adoption program. Councilmember Williams asked how long it takes to go from the first step to the second step. Mr. Winegrad stated it depends on the community. Councilmember Gutierrez inquired about the volunteers that help with his program. Mr. Winegrad stated the volunteers have to see you are moving in the right direction. Councilmember Williams asked if the spay/neuter program will help eliminate the number of dogs that need to come to the shelter. Mr. Winograd stated it does take many years to see the results. Councilmember Michael felt this would be an opportunity to make a big difference with the involvement of a public/private partnership. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public input. Addressing the City Council were: A man (did not give his name) wondered if it is possible to do this work with the County or do we have to go elsewhere. He thanked Mr. Winograd for his presentation tonight. A lady (did not give her name) stated she had tried to volunteer at the animal shelter, but could not do it because of their policies. She felt the Upland Shelter is run much better. A lady (did not give her name) felt staff at the shelter have been compassionate even though there have been various issues to work out. She felt they have done the best they could and have tried to act together for what's best for the animals. II E. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 7:20 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Approved: Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk March 16, 2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL WORKSHOP MINUTES A. CALL TO ORDER The Rancho Cucamonga City Council held a special workshop on Wednesday, March 2, 2005, in the Upper Level Training Room of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 3:30 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander Present were Councilmembers: L. Dennis Michael, Sam Spagnolo, Diane Williams and Mayor William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager; Kimberly Thomas, Management Analyst III; Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst II1: Linda Daniels, Redevelopment Director; Mike Nelson, Sr. RDA Analyst; Jan Reynolds, RDA Analyst; Flavio Nunez, RDA Analyst; Lynda Thompson, Assistant RDA Analyst; Brad Buller, City Planner; Francie Palmer, Marketing Manager; and Captain Pete Ortiz, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department. Other attendees included the Hill & Knowlton team: Krista Hildebrand, Eric Moses, and Erica Amestoy. Additional attendees included members of the community at large: Norm Mackenzie (Rancho Chamber), Rich Fletcher (business owner), Peggy Cartwright (Chaffey College), Dr, John Husing (Regional Economist), Mike Wethington (General Manager, Victoria Gardens), Glenn Miller (Marketing Manager, Victoria Gardens), David Neault (commercial broker), Len Santoro (commercial broker), Dan Blackman (business representative), and Shelley Cirrito (Cucamonga Valley Water District). Absent was Councilmember: Rex Gutierrez I B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS I No communication was made from the public. II C. ITEM(S) OF BUSINESS C1. TRAINING ON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY Redevelopment Agency Director, Linda Daniels welcomed the attendees and provided a brief overview of the purpose for the meeting. Krista Hildebrand, from the public relations firm of Hill & Knowlton, opened the workshop with a session overview and presented the attendees with the City's key message strategy (see attached), as well as suggestions on how to communicate the key messages to a variety of target audiences (media, potential business investors; real estate professionals, etc.) She discussed the process of defining and applying effective messaging, and reviewed Rancho Cucamonga's key messages with the attendees. Upon conclusion of the presentation, Ms. Hildebrand assembled the attendees into three breakout groups to provide them with an opportunity to practice delivering key messages and supporting information to a hypothetical audience (role playing). Each of the group's participants were asked questions about Rancho Cucamonga, and participants responded by providing information based on the key messages and proof points. After each individuar responded to his/her question, the group critiqued the process. At the conclusion of the breakout sessions, the groups were assembled for a final opportunity to answer some "rapid-fire" questions. After which, Ms. Hildebrand concluded the session. City Council Special Workshop Minutes March 16, 2005 Page 2 I[ E. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Michael to adjourn. The meeting adjourned at 5:20 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Linda D. Daniels Redevelopment Director Approved: March 18, 2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION MINUTES 1] A. CALL TO ORDER The Rancho Cucamonga City Council held a closed session on Wednesday, March 16, 2005, in the Tapia Room of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 5:30 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander. Present were Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, L. Dennis Michael, Sam Spagnolo, Diane Williams and Mayor William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; and Joe O'Neil, City Engineer. B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) Mayor Alexander announced the closed session item. B1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING LITIGATION PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V. 1-15 RANCHO PACIFIC, LLC, CASE NO. RCV 083510, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, REGARDING CONDEMNATION ACTION FOR PROPERTY INTERESTS ON REAL PROPERTY OWNED BY 1-15 RANCHO PACIFIC LLC, APN: 229-021-58; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOSEPH O/NElL, CITY ENGINEER, AND CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE REGARDING SETTLEMENT NEGOTIATIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING SETTLEMENT OFFER; NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH A PARTY IN THE MATTER, FOOTHILL CROSSING, LLC - CITY C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) No communication was made on the closed session item. [1 D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION The closed session began at 5:35 p.m. E. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS City Council Minutes March 16, 2005 Page 2 The closed session recessed at 6:42 p.m. with no action taken. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Regular Meetinq A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, March 16, 2005, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor William J. Alexander called the meeting to order at 7:10 p.m. Present were Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, L. Dennis Michael, Sam Spagnolo, Diane Williams and Mayor William J. Alexander. Aisc present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Director; James C. Frost, City Treasurer; Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director; Dawn Haddon, Purchasing Manager; Mike Toy, Information Systems Specialist; Charles Scott, Sr. Information Systems Specialist; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Robert Lemon, Management Analyst II; Erica Darplee, Management Analyst I; Brad Buller, City Planner; Tom Grahn, Associate Planner; Trang Huynh, Building Official; Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director; Dave Moore, Recreation Superintendent; Bill Pallotto, Recreation Supervisor; Robert Karatsu, Library Services Manager; Michelle Perera, Reference Services Coordinator; Captain Pete Ortiz, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; Chief Peter Bryan, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Kimberly Thomas, Management Analyst Itl; Shirr'l Griffin, Office Specialist II - City Clerk's Office; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. ]l B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS I B1. Presentation by Dee Matreyek regarding Restorative Justice. Dee Matreyek with the Restorative Justice Center of the Inland Empire, informed the Council that this program allows an opportunity for victims, offenders and the community to take part in righting the wrongs done when a crime is committed, and provides a systematic search for solutions to crime that promotes reconciliation. She informed the Council that the City of Upland recently adopted the use of victim/offender mediation for some of their minor offense juvenile cases and that they have had 100% success rate. She challenged the Council and the Police Chief to start a program like this and felt it would be very beneficial for instances that might occur at the mall, such as shoplifting. She felt the Council would find this program very rewarding. Councilmember Williams inquired who decides that a kid can use this program if they do something wrong. Ms. Matreyek stated cases for this program get chosen by the Probation Department. She stated the offender can request this, but that it is up to the victim if they want to be involved with this program. City Council Minutes March 16, 2005 Page 3 Councilmember Michael felt this was a good idea and encouraged her to keep working with staff on this. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he agreed. Counoilmember Michael asked if she modeled this program after someone else's. Ms. Matreyek stated there are other cities in San Bernardino County that do this. B2. Update on the West Nile Virus Plan of Action by the West Valley Mosquito and Vector Control District. Dr. Cheng reported there are cases of the West Nile Virus that have already been identified. He asked the residents to look at their property and try to eliminate any risks that could contribute to this problem. Councilmember Michael asked what people should do if they find a dead bird on their property. Dr. Cheng stated they should call 877.WNV.BIRD or 909.627.0931. Councilmember Williams suggested this be put on the City's website. B3. Presentation of a Proclamation declaring March 2005 as "Red Cross Month." The City Council presented the Proclamation to Debbie Hippen, Boardmember for the American Red Cross. B4. ADDED ITEM - Presentation of a Proclamation recognizing the week of March 28 - April 3, 2005 as "Community Development Week in Rancho Cucamonga." The City Council presented the Proclamation to Tom Grahn, Associate Planner. Tom Grahn, Associate Planner, told about the CDBG Program and the services it provides the community. Councilmember Williams encouraged people to write their legislators and tell them the CDBG money is very important to this community and should not be cut from the State's budget. She felt email was a great way to get messages to them. c. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS C1. John Lyons, Etiwanda area, stated that his heart and prayers go out to the fireman that was injured yesterday. He asked if the public would be able to speak on item 13. Mayor Alexander stated yes. Mr. Lyons commented on the newspaper article about the fire fighters and developers running the City. He stated he would like to know who these developers are. He commented on an event at the Home Depot. He stated there were protestors blocking the entrance into Home Depot. He asked people to support Rancho Cucamonga business. C2. Melanie Ingram, Rosebud Court, stated Rancho Recall is alive and well. She stated this is "National Sunshine Week - You Have the Right to Know." She stated open government is very important. She stated she is disappointed that one of the Public Communications was eliminated from the agenda and wished this would be put back on. She felt Rancho Cucamonga has taken a step backwards by eliminating the second Public Communications from the agenda. City Council Minutes March 16, 2005 Page 4 C3. Leslie Grimes stated she agreed with Melanie Ingram about the removal of the second Public Communications. She felt this had opened up communication. She asked that this be put back on the agenda. She felt Victoria Gardens was beautiful. She asked people to pray for our young men and women that volunteer to serve their country. C4. Kelly Heillig stated there was a candlelight vigil at the Animal Shelter over the weekend. She stated it was very nice. She stated on Monday night there was a City Council meeting with a presentation made by Nathan Winograd. She stated volunteers are needed at the Animal Shelter and also for the Cats in Need Program. C5. Jenna (did not give last name) stated she attended the meeting held Monday night and asked the Council to hire Mr. Winograd to set up the "no kill" shelter. C6. A lady (who did not identify himself) read a letter from Pamela Hall (which is on file in the City Clerk's office). She stated there will be a Pet Fair at Upland Memorial Park on May 21 and encouraged the City Council to attend. C7. Bill McCliman stated he made an error when he said the City Council voted on the contract for the fire fighters, as was mentioned at the last meeting by City Manager Jack Lam. He stated even though there was not a vote, the City Council is not giving the firemen what they want. He stated other City employees got their raises, but the firemen have not. He did not feel it was right for the City council to discuss labor negotiations with the newspaper and wondered why they would not discuss this at a City Council meeting. He stated at the next meeting he would like the Blue Ribbon Commission issue to be on the agenda and would like there to be a City Council item to hire Nathan Winograd. C8. Nicole Myerchin thanked the public for coming to the Monday night meeting to hear Nathan Winograd. She stated there were a lot of residents in attendance. She stated she would like to see an item on the next agenda to hire Mr. Winograd and would like there to be an item on microchipping of animals and Vet care. She also talked about the Foster Care Program and said she would like to have discussion about this at the next meeting. She asked if Councilmember Williams got the email from her on Veterinary Care. She stated the County is in a 501C3 to raise money for the animals at the Animal Shelter, and stated she would like to know how much money they have raised and what they have spent it on. She felt the money could be used to help the animals. She stated she would like to see the City get in a 501C$ to make sure when there is a fundraiser, the money goes back to the animal programs. She said she appreciated the City Council attending the meeting Monday night and asked if in the future these meetings could be videotaped. C9. Ken Christley felt Mr. Winograd should be hired to turn our shelter into a "no kill" shelter. C10. Jody Bell stated she will not go to the shelter while it is a "kill" shelter. She stated it should be a "no kill" shelter and that she did appreciate the City Council holding the meeting on Monday night. C11. Deputy Greg Hill talked about the upcoming Sheriff's Department Bicycle Rodeo to be held June 4. He stated they are already meeting to plan it. He stated on March 31st at the San Bernardino Headquarters there will be a plaque of Deputy Ron Ives dedicated. II D. CONSENT CALENDAR City Council Minutes March 16, 2005 Page 5 D1. Approval of Minutes: February 11, 2005 (Special Meeting) February 12, 2005 (Adjourned Meeting) February 16, 2005 February 22, 2005 (Special Meeting) February 24, 2005 (Special Meeting) February 28, 2005 (Special meeting) March 2, 2005 (Special meeting) D2. Approval of Warrants, Register 2/24/05 through 3/8/05 and Payroll ending 3/8/05, for the total amount of $944,932.90. D3. Approve to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of February 26, 2005. D4. Approval of plans, specifications and estimates and-to authorize the "Notice Inviting Bids" for Improvements in Phase 01/03 Final Work of Community Facilities District 2001-01 and 2003-01 for final street overlay, final striping, median island construction and landscaping, traffic signal modification, etc., on Foothill Boulevard from Rochester Avenue to 1-15 Freeway, to be funded from Acct. Nos. 16123035650/1442612-0 and 16143035650/1442614-0, and approval to allow a median break on Foothill Boulevard and change street tree designation on Foothill Boulevard. RESOLUTION NO. 05-095 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS IN PHASE 01-03 FINAL WORK OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICTS 2001-01 AND 2003-01, (TO BE BID AND CONSTRUCTED AS ONE PROJECT), INCLUDING FINAL STREET OVERLAY, FINAL STRIPING, MEDIAN ISLAND CONSTRUCTION AND LANDSCAPING, TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATION, ETC., ON FOOTHILL BOULEVARD FROM ROCHESTER AVENUE TO 1-15 FREEWAY, IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS D5. Approval of plans and specifications for the "Citywide Concrete Repair, Tree removal and Tree Planting Annual Maintenance Agreement renegotiable on a year-to-year basis, and authorize the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids", to be funded from Acct. No. 1001316-5300 ($350,000) as approved in the 2004-2005 budget. RESOLUTION NO. 05-096 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR "CITYWIDE CONCRETE REPAIR, TREE REMOVAL AND TREE PLANTING ANNUAL MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT RENEGOTIABLE ON A YEAR-TO-YEAR BASIS" AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS D6. Approval of a Resolution authorizing the Deputy City Manager, Finance Officer, and Fire Chief to execute the appropriate documentation for the purpose of obtaining Federal and State assistance from various competitive grant programs. City Council Minutes March 16, 2005 Page 6 RESOLUTION NO. 05-097 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AUTHORIZING THE DEPUTY CITY MANAGER, FINANCE OFFICER, AND FIRE CHIEF TO EXECUTE THE APPROPRIATE DOCUMENTATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF OBTAINING FEDERAL AND STATE ASSISTANCE FROM VARIOUS COMPETITIVE GRANT PROGRAMS DT. Approval of the Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update. DS. Approval of expenditure with Brodart, Inc. for the acquisition of library materials for the Archibald Library in the amount of $70,000 from Library Account 12906015200. D9. Approval of a request from the Christian Okoye Foundation for a Waiver of Rental Fees for a Free Youth Football/Soccer Clinic at the Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter and Adult Sports Complex (soccer fields) on April 2, 2005. D10. Approval for Annual Product Support and Service Renewal from the provider, Oracle Corporation in the amount of $34,100 to be funded from General Fund, Administrative Services Department, Information Systems Division, 1001-209-5300 and 1001-209-5152. Dll. Approval to appropriate $76,000 out of AB1600 reserves into Acct. No.1016301-5300 (Contract Services) in connection with City/County initiated Annexation DRC2004-01204. D12. Approval of an expenditure of $24,00 for the marking of underground utilities by Underground Technology Inc. (UTI) (CO 03-087) as approved in the 04/05 budget, and appropriate an additional $16,000 for Fiscal Year 2004-2005, to be funded from Acct. No. 1001316-5300. D13. Approval to accept Grant Revenue in the amount of $30,833.00 from the United States Department of Justice 2005 Byrne Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Award into Acct. No. 1354000-4740 (Grant Income) for use by the Police Department for the purchase of Police related equipment and technology. D14. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for DRC2002-00264, located on the southwest corner of 6th Street and Utica Avenue, submitted by 6th & Utica, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company. RESOLUTION NO. 05-098 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DRC2002-00264 RESOLUTION NO. 05-099 A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DRC2002-00264 D15. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for DRC2004- 00145, located on the south side of Arrow Route, east of Utica Avenue, submitted by Public Storage, Inc. City Council Minutes March 16, 2005 Page 7 RESOLUTION NO. 05-100 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR DRC2004- 00145 RESOLUTION NO. 05-101 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DRC2004-00145 D16. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 for Tract 16554, located at the southwest corner of Hermosa and Base Line Road, submitted by HL Homes Corporation. RESOLUTION NO. 05-102 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 16554, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY RESOLUTION NO. 05-103 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR TRACT MAP 16554 D17. Approval to execute a Professional Services Agreement in the amount of $61,000 to Butsko Utility Desi(~n, Inc. (CO 05-021), for system planning, design and inspection of Marketplace Properties and Victoria Gardens Southern Parcel within the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility service area, to be funded $26,900 from Acct. No. 17053035650/1485705, $34,100 from Acct. No. 17053035650/1487705 Municipal Utility Fund. D18. Approval of a Professional Services Agreement with Maximus (CO 05-022) in the amount of $50,200 to provide consulting services related to preparation of an Engineering Division User Fee Study and an Engineering Division Development Impact Fee Study, to be funded from Acct. No. 10163015300, and approval of an appropriation of $50,200 to Acct. No. 10013055300.' D19. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 16454-1, located at the southeast corner of Base Line Road and Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by KB Home Greater Los Angeles, Inc. RESOLUTION NO. 05-104 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 16454-1 City Council Minutes March 16, 2005 Page 8 D20. Approval to accept Improvements, retain the Faithful Performance and Labor and Material Letter of Credit for six months after acceptance, accept a Maintenance Guarantee Cash Deposit and file a Notice of Completion for ~mprovements for DRC2003-00072, located on the east side of Archibald Avenue, between 4th and 6th Street, submitted by Calwest Industrial Properties. RESOLUTION NO. 05-105 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2003-00072 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D21. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Letter of Credit as the Maintenance Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for Improvements for DRCDR00-41, located on the south side of 6th Street, west of Haven, submitted by Cabot Industrial Propedies, L.P. RESOLUTION NO. 05-106 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRCDR00-41 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D22. Approval to release the Maintenance Cash Deposit for PM 15278, located on the southwest corner of Banyan Street and London Avenue, submitted by P.K.T. Properties, LLC. D23. Approval to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 14162, ocated on the south side of 19th Street at the western City limit, submitted by Promus Investment Network, Inc. D24. Approval to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 14494-1, located on the north side of Banyan Street, west of Day Creek Boulevard, submitted by US Home Corporation. D25. Approval to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bonds for Tract 15540, located between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Route, east of Baker Avenue, submitted by Van Daele Development Corporation. D26. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for Tract 16263, located on the southeast corner of Base Line Road and Ellena West, submitted by KB Home Greater Los Angeles, Inc. RESOLUTION NO. 05-107 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON(3A, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 16263 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D27. Approval to accept the Mall On-Site Water and Sewer of Community Facilities District 2003-01, Contract No. 03-117 as complete, retain the Faithful Performance Bond as a Guarantee Bond, release the labor and Material Bond, and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $1,395,980.00. RESOLUTION NO. 05-108 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE MALL ON-SITE WATER AND SEWER OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2003- 01, CONTRACT NO. 03-117 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK City Council Minutes March 16, 2005 Page 9 D28. Approval to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond No. 83 SB 104078528 BCM in the amount of $35,260.01 for the Banyan Street Widening from Rochester Avenue to 2000' west, Contract No. 03-050. D29. Approval to accept the Temporary Power Pole and Overhead Wire Installation project, Contract No. 03-077, as complete, approval of a change order in the amount of $62,171.80, to be funded from Acct. No. 17053035650/1382705-0 from Municipal Utility fund, retain the Faithful Performance Bond as a Guarantee Bond, release the Labor and Material Bond, and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $109,036.80. RESOLUTION NO. 05-109 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE TEMPORARY POWER POLE AND OVERHEAD WIRE INSTALLATION PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. 03-077 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D30. Approval to accept the Phase lB(e) of Community Facilities District 2001-01, including landscaping and amenities on Arbor Lane, Contract No. 04-069 as complete, retain the Faithful Performance Bond as a Guarantee Bond, release the Labor and Material Bond, and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $1,664,586.54. RESOLUTION NO. 05-110 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PHASE lB(E) OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2001-01, INCLUDING LANDSCAPING AND AMENITIES ON ARBOR LANE, CONTRACT NO. 04-069 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D31. Approval of the Resolutions approving and confirming the Engineer's Report and Setting of Public Hearing for May 18, 2005, to levy the Annual Assessments for Fiscal Year 2005/2006 for Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1,2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE IS PROPOSED. RESOLUTION NO. 05-111 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FOR APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 AND 10. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE PROPOSED. RESOLUTION NO. 05-112 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 AND 10 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2005/2006 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO City Council Minutes March 16, 2005 Page 10 D32. Approval of the Resolutions approving and confirming the Engineer's Report and Setting of Public Hearing for May 18, 2005, to levy the annual assessments for Fiscal Year 2005/2006 for Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE IS PROPOSED. RESOLUTION NC). 05-113 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FOR APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORTS FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8. NO iNCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE PROPOSED. RESOLUTION NO. 05-114 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2005/2006 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO D33. Approval of the Resolutions approving and confirming the Engineer's Repods and Setting of Public Hearing for May 18, 2005, to levy the Annual Assessments of Fiscal Year 2005/2006 for the Park and Recreation Improvement District (PD-85). NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE IS PROPOSED. RESOLUTION NO. 05-115 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FOR APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORT FOR PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-85). NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE PROPOSED. RESOLUTION NO. 05-116 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-85) FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2005/2006 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Gutierrez to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports contained within the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. E. CONSENT ORDINANCES El. CONSIDERATION OF 2ND READING OF AN ORDINANCE OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ADDING CHAPTER 19.20 TO TITLE 19 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO THE PROTECTION AND REGULATION OF THE CITY'S MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM (MS4) AS REQUIRED BY STATE AND FEDERAl LAW City Council Minutes March 16,2005 Page11 Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 740. ORDINANCE NO. 740 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 19.20 TO TITLE 19 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO THE PROTECTION AND REGULATION OF THE CITY'S MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM (MS4) MOTION: Moved by Michael, seconded by Williams to waive full reading and set second reading of Ordinance No. 740 for the next meeting. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. II F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS I No Items Submitted. II G. PUBLIC HEARINGS I Gl. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REVISING REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO POSSESSION AND CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES WITHIN CITY PARKS, AND AMENDING TITLE 12 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director, asked that item 12 be considered at this time also and presented a staff report. Councilmember Michael asked if there is criteria to deny someone alcohol. Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director, stated it would not be by the user, but by the use. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council were: Lynn Christie of the Senior Advisory Committee and a resident of Rancho Cucamonga, stated she does not drink alcohol. She stated drinking is legal and has been allowed at the current senior center. She felt if alcohol were allowed, it would generate revenue. She felt the primary competition for room rental is Etiwanda Gardens. She felt with control, there would not be a problem for the neighborhoods if alcohol was allowed. Leslie Grimes agreed with the idea of making sure the person being honored is over the age of 21. She did not think the Etiwanda Gardens owner should worry about this being approved because she did not feel it would hurt his business. She stated there was nothing wrong with competition and that she supports this. John Lyons felt when there is only going to be a toast, champagne should be allowed and that the other conditions should not apply. He felt nonalcoholic beverages should be served if alcohol is served. A lady (did not identify herself) stated she has a problem serving alcohol near her home. There being no fudher input, the public hearing was closed. City Council Minutes March 16, 2005 Page 12 MOTION: Moved by Michael to waive full reading and approve Ordinance No. 741. Councilmember Michael stated he hopes that the City does not get in competition with private industry. He stated he was concerned about people bringing in their own caterer with their own drinks. He stated he would like to see a group of caterers approved that could be used by customers that the City can regulate to meet our expectations. He felt this might be a better way to manage alcohol consumption. Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director, stated this was discussed and could be inserted into the policy. Mayor Alexander asked if this would be in the policy or the Ordinance. James Markman, City Attorney, stated it would be in the policy and continued to explain what the Ordinance does. Councilmember Michael asked where the City would get the revenue if we cannot charge more than what we collect. Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director, stated it would be from the rental of the building and that type of thing. Councilmember Williams stated she agreed with comments made by Councilmember Michael and felt there should be a list of caterers developed if alcohol is being served. She felt a professional caterer would assume some of the responsibility if there is a problem. Councilmember Michael asked.if the existing senior center would still be allowing alcohol. Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director, explained this Ordinance would allow alcohol in City parks and that the existing senior center is not in a park. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he went to the neighborhoods around Central Park to talk to them about this and that it was about a 2 to I ratio of people that did not mind if alcohol is served. He felt the people in these neighborhoods should be allowed to help the City Council make this decision. He stated he still does not feel it is right for the public sector to get involved in this type of activity. He wondered if we should wait until this facility is a little older. He did not know if it was worth the $44,000 it would generate. He felt the City would do fine without the alcohol. Councilmember Spagnolo asked if Kevin McArdle has received any comments from other cities that have had problems serving beer and wine. Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director, commented that our existing senior center has not had any problems because of serving alcohol. He added they received no incident reports from other cities. Councilmember Spagnolo asked if there would be hard liquor served. Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director, stated no that only beer, wine and champagne would be allowed. Councilmember Spagnolo stated he would be in favor of the public giving their input on this. Councilmember Williams stated there could be three separate parties going on at the same time and felt security would be very important to handle everything. She felt the policy was critical and felt there could be a lot of problems with this. Mayor Alexander stated he did not agree that someone with a very small party having to use one of the City's caterers. He stated we are not talking Margarita Beach or a lounge. City Council Minutes March 16, 2005 Page 13 Councilmember Williams felt the caterer idea is a good one because she did not think it.should be left up to the City staff to deal with someone that has had too much to drink. She felt this was a 9ood way to meet in the middle. She did not think the $44,000 revenue was that much money considering there is a $1,000,000 budget for this facility. Councilmember Michael asked if there will be problems with serving the youth because of having parties there. Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director, stated no. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated staff will work on these suggestions for the policy. Councilmember Michael stated the caterer list is only for those groups that want to serve alcohol. He stated he does not want to approve the Ordinance unless the policy is approved. James Markman, City Attorney, stated the policy can come back with the second reading of the Ordinance. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 741. ORDINANCE NO. 741 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REVISING REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO POSSESSION AND CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES WITHIN CITY PARKS, AND AMENDING TITLE 12 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Spagnolo to waive full reading and set second reading for the next meeting and to bring back the policy identified in item 12. Motion carried 4-1 (Gutierrez voted G2. CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY FOR THE ACQUISITION IN EMINENT DOMAIN OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS TO AND WIDENING OF BASE LINE ROAD ACROSS A PORTION OF APN 1100-011-02 Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated since one of the property owners pertaining to this does not understand this process, he asked that this be continued for one month. He stated the developer has no problems with the continuance. James Markman, City Attorney, stated it is suggested to continue this to April 20, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers located at the Civic Center at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. RESOLUTION NO. 05-094 A RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES AND AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION THEREOF IN CONNECTION WITH THE IMPROVEMENTS TO AND WIDENING OF BASE LINE ROAD (PORTIONS OF ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 1100-011-02) MOTION: Moved by Michael, seconded by Williams to continue the item to April 20, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers located at the Civic Center at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. City Council Minutes March 16, 2005 Page 14 II H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS I H1. UPDATE ON IMPACTS OF MEASURE I ORDINANCE ON CITY TRANSPORTATION FEF STRUCTURE A staff report and power point presentation were given by Erica Darplee, Management Analyst I. Councilmember Spagnolo inquired how much time we have to do this. Erica Darplee, Management Analyst I, stated we have until November 2006. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated the longer this waits, the increase will be pushed out to future developers. He stated this could be brought back at a near future meeting. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public input. There being no response, public comments were closed. MOTION: Moved by Spagnolo, seconded by Gutierrez to approve staff's recommendation and bring the Ordinance back at a future meeting. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. II I. COUNCIL BUSINESS I1. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Councilmember.) Councilmember Michael stated the State did provide some funding to the Library and that on April 15 the hours of operation will increase. He stated the Red Cross helped us through the fires of October 2003 and felt people should help them. He stated if the contract for Nathan Winograd is not on the next agenda, it is because Mr. Winograd has asked that it come back at the meeting after that. Councilmember Williams stated the Library will be open on Friday's effective April 15, which is in conjunction with National Library Week. She added that is also tax day. She stated today at SANBAG it was noted that the City would receive $954,900 for the electric bike trails. She stated Joe O'Neil has indicated this would be up and running within one year. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he would like to request communication from CALTRANS with their schedule or plan for landscaping along the 210 Freeway. He asked for this report to come back as soon as possible. He stated he would like information on the synchronization of traffic signals on City streets/thoroughfares, particularly those streets that might have been affected by recent improvements or public works projects. He mentioned the signal at Rochester where the green light only lasts about four seconds. He suggested that some of the animal shelter events, such as the pet adoption fares, be held at the Mall in the plaza area where there is a lot of pedestrian traffic. He stated he would like a report as soon as possible on what we are going to do to support different departments in the City, particularly fire, and wanted information on the City's finances. He stated the report should include what is our surplus, what is the cost of adding a fire station, what would be the cost for the pay raises for the firemen and information on the pension report and how it affects the bottom line. 12. APPROVAL OF POLICIES AND PROCEDURES GOVERNING THE SERVING OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES IN THE SENIOR AND COMMUNITY CENTER AT CENTRAL PARK SEE DISCUSSION UNDER G1 FOR THIS ITEM. City Council Minutes March 16, 2005 Page 15 13. RECONSIDERATION OF APPOINTMENTS TO OMNITRANS AND SANBAG (Oral) Mayor Alexander stated he has been asked by many people why he is not on SANBAG any longer. He stated in this particular position, there has been years of knowledge and experience in transportation, funding and construction that have paid huge dividends to this community, the City and the region in the form of completed projects. He stated there has been a history of positive relations with respected and influential members of the state and federal governments, other elected officials, as well as members of key staff. He felt we have earned a lot of respect of being a very fair and loyal voice to the community and the citizens, not only in Rancho Cucamonga, but the surrounding regions served by agencies such as SANBAG, SCAG and Metrolink. He stated there has been years of service and education that have been picked up and that it would not get made up in a month, three or six months or a year. He stated there has been countless hours walking and talking with people in various communities that are troubled or concerned to try to help them solve transportation deficiencies. He stated the position of Mayor in Rancho Cucamonga has been very honored to have chaired the SANBAG Board as well as the Metrolink agency. He stated he has chaired several committees of SANBAG including Major Projects, Regional Commuter Rail and the Administration Committee. He stated he has served on the Budget Committee for Omnitrans, as well as Personnel. He stated the Mayor of this community was a major player and advocate in planning, financing and successfully passing Measure I, which was transportation legislation that was very important to the City. He stated we have achieved a tremendous amount of respect in transportation agencies while serving on local and regional boards. He stated he has spent a lot of time on weekends, holidays and evenings with people whenever they have wanted to talk. He stated this includes other elected officials, staff, and technical committees to assure that the City was a recipient of all available improvements. He stated he has always supported his fellow Councilmembers in their expressed desire for assignments, from the League of California Cities to LAFCO. He stated he has invested volumes of time and personal sacrifice to enhance his knowledge and skills and contacts to see that the people in our City and region are the beneficiary of these efforts. He felt starting from scratch is not a service to our citizens and our community. Councilmember Spagnolo stated he came from an organization that looked at tenure and leadership with respect. He stated he respects what Councilmember Williams brings to LAFCO and stated he feels the same way about the Mayor's role on SANBAG and Omnitrans. He asked the City Council to reconsider their vote on this. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public input. Addressing the City Council were: John Lyons stated he does not agree with this type of politics. He encouraged the City Council to consider putting tenure back on the committee. Charlene Arizza stated she has worked for Metrolink for many years and has worked with Mayor Alexander for many years also. She talked about the Metrolink system and what has taken place while Mayor Alexander was on the Metrolink Board. She asked that Mayor Alexander be reconsidered to serve on the Board. Melanie Ingram stated she is in favor of reconsidering Mayor Alexander to serve on these committees. She felt it was predetermined and orchestrated when these appointments were recently done. She felt Mayor Alexander has had an extremely strong voice in SANBAG issues. She did not feel it is time to change horses in the middle of the stream. She felt it was in the best interest of the City to reconsider the Mayor to these committees. Leslie Grimes stated she did not see any good reason to remove the Mayor from SANBAG and Omnitrans. She asked that the City Council allow the Mayor to remain in the positions of SANBAG and Omnitrans. Nicole Myerchin stated she has heard from the audience what Councilmember Williams did to get the Mayor off of these committees. She felt Councilmember Williams should shine above the men and asked the City Council to reconsider the appointments. She felt Councilmember Gutierrez sets an example with the students. She felt Mayor Alexander has respected the idea City Council Minutes March 16, 2005 Page 16 that Councilmember Williams wanted to be Mayor Pro Tern and voted for her. She stated that Councilmember Michael stated he likes new ideas but did not feel this should apply because the Mayor was doing a good job. She asked everyone to reconsider this. Kelly Heillig asked that the Mayor be reconsidered for these positions and felt this was a political game the way this was done. Bill McCliman felt Councilmember Williams was "one beck of a politician." He commented on the 3-2 vote on issues and compared this to Survivor. He hoped Councilmember Michael would change his vote on this. He stated even though there are not many people here, he does not hear anyone support the decision that was previously made. There being no further public input, public comments was closed. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he respects the opinions of people, but stated he sees a lot of contradictions. He felt Councilmember Williams has a lot of experience and respects that. He stated he respects the Mayor too. He stated he did not think there is an alliance amongst the Council considering he just got shot down on the alcohol issue. He stated he values differences. He felt sometimes the people speaking are strategizing. He felt the whole Council has done work to help with the improvements that have been made throughout the region. He felt it is positive to rotate the members of these Boards. He did not feel the City will be hurt by this change. Councilmember Michael stated there have been many elected officials over the years that have rotated this position. He stated he looks forward to the City Council all getting along. He stated he felt the voters in the State like term limits. He stated there was no backroom deal on this vote. He stated he made his decision based on two people stating they would like to serve on these committees. He stated this is no game to him and that he sees nothing or no reason why he should change his mind. He felt change is healthy. MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Spagnolo to reconsider Mayor Alexander for the SANBAG and Omnitrans positions. Motion failed 2-3 (Gutierrez, Michael and Williams voted no). 14. CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST BY STEVE AND JOAN KNECHT FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IN RELOCATING DOGS Councilmember Gutierrez stated the Knecht's could not be present tonight, but felt they needed time to get rid of all their dogs. He felt their request should be granted. Councilmember Williams asked if they agreed they would not breed their dogs during this extension of time. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he did not know. Councilmember Williams stated she does not have any problems with the twelve months. Councilmember Michael felt there are eight months left. He stated he cannot support this extension if they continue to breed their dogs. He felt that should be included in his motion. Councilmember Spagnolo felt he would like to see the Knecht's here to get clarification. Mayor Alexander stated he does not understand why the Knecht's cannot be here to defend themselves. He felt it was time to say they need to quit breaking the law. He read a letter received from Bobbi Cantwell (which is on file in the City Clerk's office) that could not be present at the meeting who did not feel the Knecht's should be given the extension. Mayor Alexander stated he would agree to a total of six months on the extension. City Council Minutes March 16, 2005 Page 17 MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Alexander to grant the Knecht's six months to get rid of their dogs. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public input. Addressing the City Council were: A lady (did not give her name) did not agree with the six-month extension. She did not feel they would have any problem getting rid of the dogs. Nicole Myerchin stated this has been on the agenda for eight months. She stated these are not pets, they are being treated as a money making machine. She felt this is so sad. She felt this is not right for the animals. She stated Councilmember Gutierrez is working against the animals. She asked that they not be given an extension. Bill McCliman felt Councilmember Gutierrez was disrespectful. He did not feel the Knecht's should be given an extension. Leslie Grimes stated she is insulted about the previous comments made about alliances. She stated she does not feel these people should be able to breed their dogs if they are given an extension. She felt a year was a long time for an extension. She also stated she would like the City to see how Claremont handles their alcohol issues at their center. Brenda (did not give her last name) stated she does not have an alliance with anyone either. She stated she just loves her dogs. Kelly Heillig asked if the extension is granted that the dogs be spayed and neutered. Mayor Alexander stated he was withdrawing his second on the motion. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he would like to make a motion to allow them six months to get rid of their dogs, but they would not be allowed to breed their dogs. Councilmember Williams stated she would like to get a letter from them about this. James Markman, City Attorney, stated the direction to staff would be to give them three additional months from the January extension previously given, for the staff to hold up the enforcement, advising the Knecht's they have three more months with the condition that no breeding occurs. He stated if breeding does occur, enforcement would be immediate. MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Gutierrez to grant the Knecht's three additional months with the condition that no breeding occur, and if breeding does occur, enforcement would be immediate. Motion carried 4-1 (Alexander voted no). Councilmember Williams stated the Restaurant Grading Ordinance was misrepresented in the newspaper, which caused misinterpretation by the community who seem to think that now in Rancho Cucamonga we do not require health inspections. She stated rather than live with that she would like this brought back at the April 6 meeting. City Council Minutes March 16, 2005 Page 18 MOTION: Moved by Michael, seconded by Alexander to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 11:02 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Approved: * Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Check No. AP-00220542 AP-00220542 AP- 00220543 AP- 00220544 AP- 00220544 AP- 00220545 AP- 00220546 AP-00220547 AP-00220548 AP-00220549 AP- 00220550 AP- 00220551 AP- 00220552 AP-00220552 AP-00220552 AP- 00220552 AP- 00220553 AP-00220554 AP-00220555 AP- 00220556 AP-00220558 AP-00220559 AP-00220560 AP-00220560 AP 00220560 AP 00220560 AP 00220560 AP 00220560 AP 00220560 AP 00220560 AP 00220560 AP 00220562 AP 00220562 AP 00220563 AP 00220563 AP 00220563 AP- 00220564 AP- 00220565 AP-00220566 AP-00220566 AP-00220567 AP-00220569 AP-00220570 AP-00220570 AP-00220570 AP-00220570 AP- 00220572 AP- 00220573 AP- 00220574 AP- 00220575 AP-00220576 AP-00220577 AP- 00220578 AP- 00220579 Check Date 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2OO5 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/9/2005 through 3/29/2005 Vendor Name A AND K 30 MIN PHOTO LAB INC A AND K 30 MEg PHOTO LAB [NC A AND R TIRE SERVICE ABC LOCKSMITHS ABC LOCKSMITHS ABLAC ADAMSON, RONALD ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL ADT SECURITY SERVICES INC ALLEN, SYLVESTER R ALTA FIRE EQUIPMENT CO AMERICAN CLASSIC SANITATION INC. AMERICAN LANDSCAPE INC AMERICAN LANDSCAPE EgC AMERICAN LANDSCAPE 1NC AMERICAN LANDSCAPE INC APG COMPANY APPLIED METERING TECHNOLOGIES INC ARBOR NURSERY INC ARCHIBALD PET HOSPITAL ASTRUM UTILITY SERVICES AUFBAU CORPORATION B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE BASELINE HARDWARE BASELINE HARDWARE BEARD PROVENCHER AND ASSOC BEARD PROVENCHER AND ASSOC BEARD PROVENCHER AND ASSOC BEHRENS, AMBER BELAIRE-WEST LANDSCAPE INC BENGTZEN, WANDA BENGTZEN, WANDA BILL AND WAGS EgC BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAIl_ BURR CYCLES 1NC, JOHN BURR CYCLES INC, JOHN BURR CYCLES INC, JOHN BURR CYCLES INC, JOHN CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD CALSENSE CAPIO CATRON, DALE B CCPOA CERTIFIED AUTO CARE Amount 11.91 45.26 10,625.62 142.50 176.54 273.17 1,056.00 75.00 349.35 113.70 22.63 69.70 86,576.57 -8,657.66 -124.88 1,248.80 5,250.00 9,904.69 400.83 75.00 9,625.00 18,352.00 36.90 223.65 142.40 49.51 1,394.29 1,394.29 697.14 1,228.35 191.14 9.69 46.53 4,110.00 10,860.00 8,448.00 50.00 29,477.33 195.00 195.00 250.00 20,234.74 125.40 463.10 234.66 66.00 232.33 22.50 25.00 295.87 32.27 269.36 30.00 22.28 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT Page: 1 RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 03/30/5 Time2 13:3 Check No. AP-00220580 AP-00220581 AP 00220582 AP 00220582 AP 00220582 AP 00220582 AP 00220582 AP 00220583 AP 00220583 AP 00220584 AP 00220584 AP 00220584 AP 00220584 AP 00220585 AP 00220586 AP 00220587 AP- 00220588 AP-00220589 AP-00220590 AP-00220590 AP-00220590 AP-00220590 AP-00220592 AP-00220592 AP-00220592 AP- 00220592 AP- 00220592 AP- 00220592 AP- 00220592 AP- 00220592 AP- 00220592 AP-00220592 AP-00220592 AP-00220592 AP-00220592 AP- 00220592 AP- 00220592 AP-00220592 AP- 00220592 AP-00220592 AP- 00220592 AP- 00220592 AP- 00220592 AP- 00220592 AP- 00220592 AP- 00220592 AP-00220592 AP-00220592 AP-00220592 AP-00220592 AP-00220592 AP-00220592 AP-00220592 AP- 00220592 Check Date 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/9/2005 through 3/29/2005 Vendor Name CHAFFEY COLLEGE FOUNDATION CHAMPION AWARDS AND SPECIALIES CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. CLARKE PLUMB1NG SPECIALTIES INC. CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. CLAYTON GROUP SERVICES INC CLAYTON GROUP SERVICES INC COMP USA INC COMP USA INC COMP USA INC COMP USA INC CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS 1 CORONA CLAY COMPANY COURT TRUSTEE COURT TRUSTEE COVERMASTER INC CRAFCO INC CRAFCO 1NC CRAFCO INC CRAFCO INC CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 5.00 4,444.90 40.72 104.13 88.44 199.12 190.85 5,817.87 1,434.50 546.00 260.00 646.50 1,357.64 166.47 1,198.72 200.00 118.50 135.00 1,137.84 460.83 372.64 447.55 231.03 633.53 473.11 585.23 74.73 76.58 154.78 87.28 64.73 202.73 316.58 336.13 86.58 142.93 208.48 427.68 119.58 52.08 39.43 70.13 111.43 72.43 106.83 125.23 151.68 20.18 39.43 81.63 124.08 85.43 308.08 126.38 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 2 Current Date: 03/30/~ Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portxait Layout Time: 13:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/9/2005 through 3/29/2005 .Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00220592 3/9/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 109.13 AP - 00220592 3/9/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 77.03 AP - 00220592 3/9/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 40.58 AP - 00220592 3/9/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 77.73 AP - 00220592 3/9/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 40.13 AP - 00220592 3/9/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 42.88 AP - 00220592 3/9/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 120.63 AP - 00220592 3/9/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 213.78 AP - 00220592 3/9/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 145.93 AP - 00220592 3/9/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 595.58 AP - 00220592 3/9/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 204.58 AP - 00220592 3/9/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 140.28 AP - 00220592 3/9/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 201.13 AP - 00220592 3/9/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 22.48 AP - 00220592 3/9/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 21.33 AP - 00220592 3/9/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 23.63 AP - 00220592 3/9/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 22.48 AP - 00220592 3/9/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 90.03 AP - 00220592 3/9/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 487.93 AP - 00220592 3/9/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 379.38 AP - 00220592 3/9/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 210.33 AP - 00220592 3/9/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 202.28 AP - 00220592 3/9/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 363.40 AP - 00220592 3/9/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 374.78 AP - 00220592 3/9/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 306.47 AP - 00220592 3/9/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 503.58 AP - 00220592 3/9/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 62.43 AP - 00220592 3/9/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 155.13 AP - 00220592 3/9/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 174.68 AP - 00220592 3/9/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 64.73 AP - 00220593 3/9/2005 CUTTING EDGE VIDEO CONCEPTS 5,595.00 AP - 00220594 3/9/2005 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 3,582.72 AP - 00220596 3/9/2005 DAPPER TIRE CO 39.23 AP - 00220597 3/9/2005 DEER CREEK CAR CARE CENTER 87.50 AP - 00220598 3/9/2005 DELLHIME, SIGMUND 58.12 AP - 00220599 3/9/2005 DELTA MICROIMAGING 1NC 623.61 AP - 00220600 3/9/2005 DOUBLE D PIPELINE INC 90,000.00 AP - 00220600 3/9/2005 DOUBLE D PIPELINE INC 63,755.70 AP - 00220601 3/9/2005 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 548.02 AP - 00220601 3/9/2005 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 9.64 AP - 00220601 3/9/2005 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 137.88 AP - 00220601 3/9/2005 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 30.47 AP - 00220601 3/9/2005 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 145.82 AP - 00220602 3/9/2005 ECOLOGY CONSTRUCTION INC 166,458.65 AP - 00220603 3/9/2005 EGGERS, ROBERT A. 355.50 AP - 00220605 3/9/2005 ELECTRONICS WAREHOUSE 57.l 1 AP - 00220606 3/9/2005 EMCOR SERVICE 7,832.30 AP - 00220609 3/9/2005 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 176.17 AP - 00220610 3/9/2005 EXCLUSIVE EMAGES 137.92 AP - 00220611 3/9/2005 EXPERIAN 50.00 AP - 00220613 3/9/2005 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 11.32 AP - 00220613 3/9/2005 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORE 11.48 AP - 00220614 3/9/2005 FIELDMAN ROLAPP AND ASSOCIATES 4,443.80 AP - 00220614 3/9/2005 FIELDMAN ROLAPP AND ASSOCIATES 1,923.48 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 3 Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 03/30/7~ Time: 13:3 Check No. AP-00220615 AP-00220616 AP-00220616 AP- 00220616 AP-00220617 AP-00220619 AP-00220620 AP-00220620 AP- 00220620 AP- 00220621 AP-00220622 AP- 00220622 AP-00220622 AP-00220623 AP-00220624 AP-00220626 AP-00220627 AP 00220629 AP 00220631 AP 00220632 AP 00220633 AP 00220633 AP 00220633 AP 00220633 AP 00220633 AP 00220634 AP 00220634 AP 00220634 AP 00220634 AP 00220634 AP 00220634 AP- 00220634 AP- 00220635 AP- 00220636 AP-00220637 AP-00220638 AP-00220638 AP-00220639 AP- 00220639 AP- 00220639 AP- 00220639 AP-00220640 AP-00220640 AP-00220641 AP- 00220643 AP- 00220643 AP- 00220644 AP-00220645 AP- 00220645 AP- 00220645 AP-00220645 AP- 00220647 AP-00220649 AP-00220649 Check Date 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/9/2005 through 3/29/2005 Vendor Name FILARSKY AND WATF FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES FINGERPRINT AMERICA FIRST PLACE TROPHIES PLO-SYSTEMS INC PLO-SYSTEMS INC FLO-SYSTEMS INC FOOTHILL FAMILY SHELTER FORD OF UPLAND INC FORD OF UPLAND INC FORD OF UPLAND INC FUKUSHIMA, JUDITH FULLMER CONSTRUCTION GAIL MATERIALS GARNER, CATHLEEN GOLD'N WEST SURPLUS GOLF VENTURES WEST GONSALVES AND SON,JOE A GRAINGER, WW GRAINGER, WW GRAINGER, WW GRA1NGER, WW GR~INGER, WW GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT HAKIMI, SUSAN HARALAMBOS BEVERAGE COMPANY HARDY, BRADLEY HOLIDAY PRINTING HOLIDAY PRINTING HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES HOMELESS OUTREACH PRGMS AND EDUCATI( HOMELESS OUTREACH PRGMS AND EDUCATI/ HOUSE OF RUTH HUNTINGTON HARDWARE HUNTINGTON HARDWARE HURST, CHERYL HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY COMPANY INLAND FAIR HOUSING AND MEDIATION INLAND FAIR HOUSING AND MEDIATION Amount 1,550.00 510.00 666.00 960.00 790.00 45.25 5,715.00 122.16 127.84 417.00 78.03 103.83 62.50 2,340.00 1,000.00 2,221.71 27.13 1,577.00 347.90 3,000.00 532.39 33.83 37.91 296.27 119.97 27.53 198.63 72.54 113.38 222.61 112.04 167.88 125.07 482.16 260.50 20,864.54 4,931.45 28.45 28.03 33.03 205.59 533.00 533.00 633.00 778.10 1,414.83 288.50 41.42 82.91 63.33 570.25 83.87 1,038.14 1,031.66 User: AHAWORTH - Arm Haworth Report:CK_AGENDA KEG PORTRAIT Page: 4 RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 03/30/~ Time: 13:3 Check No. AP- 00220649 AP-00220649 AP- 00220650 AP-00220652 AP-00220653 AP-00220654 AP-00220654 AP-00220655 AP-00220656 AP-00220659 AP-00220660 AP-00220661 AP-00220662 AP- 00220664 AP- 00220664 AP-00220664 AP-00220664 AP-00220664 AP-00220666 AP-00220666 AP-00220668 AP-00220669 AP-00220670 AP-00220671 AP-00220671 AP-00220673 AP-00220675 AP- 00220675 AP-00220675 AP-00220676 AP-00220676 AP 00220676 AP 00220678 AP 00220679 AP 00220679 AP 00220680 AP 00220682 AP 00220684 AP 00220684 AP 00220684 AP 00220685 AP 00220685 AP 00220685 AP 00220685 AP 00220685 AP 00220685 AP 00220685 AP 00220685 AP 00220686 AP- 00220686 AP-00220686 AP-00220686 AP-00220686 AP-00220686 Check Date 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Re~ister 3/9/2005 through 3/29/2005 Vendor Name INLAND FAIR HOUSING AND MEDIATION INLAND FAIR HOUSING AND MEDIATION INLAND LIBRARY SYSTEM INTERACTIVE DATA CORPORATION JOBS AVAILABLE 1NC KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC KB HOME KB HOMES GREATER LOS ANGELES INC LARKIN, DAVID W LASER LINE LASER TECHNOLOGY 1NC LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE LOWE'S COMPANIES INC. LOWE'S COMPANIES INC. LOWE'S COMPANIES INC. LOWE'S COMPANIES INC. LOWE'S COMPANIES 1NC. MAIN STREET SIGNS MAIN STREET SIGNS MARSHALL AND'MCKNIGHT TOWING INC MASTER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION MCLEOD PLUMBING INC, SCOTT MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY MDC RANCHO ONE LLC MOUNTAIN VIEW EM PHYS MEDICAL GROUP I MOUNTAIN VIEW EM PHYS MEDICAL GROUP I MOUNTAIN VIEW EM PHYS MEDICAL GROUP 1 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR N M A DUES C/O DAVID MCDONALD NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS INC NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS INC NATIONAL DEFERRED NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC O C B REPROGRAPHICS 1NC O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE Amount 602.20 633.47 1,548.00 82.43 322.92 68,487.72 1,202.30 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,017.00 45.00 232.94 4,995.00 160.71 134.71 144.39 51.73 114.94 845.84 905.53 60.00 1,000.00 77.40 686.02 1,237.03 1,000.00 185.00 I10.00 110.00 123.46 267.60 64.30 5.54 100.00 75.28 27,221.63 52.28 35.02 35.02 304.08 127.21 3.40 17.98 44.39 21.77 120.58 21.69 25.20 32.16 13.95 14.75 53.00 53.00 53.00 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 5 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 03/30E: Time: 13:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/9/2005 through 3/29/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00220686 3/9/2005 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 63.58 AP - 00220686 3/9/2005 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 5.21 AP - 00220686 3/9/2005 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 53.00 AP - 00220686 3/9/2005 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 53.00 AP - 00220687 3/9/2005 OTT, LAURA 90.00 AP - 00220687 3/9/2005 OTT, LAURA 369.00 AP - 00220687 3/9/2005 OTT, LAURA 1 I2.75 AP - 00220688 3/9/2005 OWEN ELECTRIC 77.04 AP - 00220689 3/9/2005 P A P A 55.00 AP - 00220690 3/9/2005 P A P A 55.00 AP - 00220691 3/9/2005 PARSAC 80,917.00 AP - 00220693 3/9/2005 PENNELL, JENNIFER 69.23 AP - 00220694 3/9/2005 PEP BOYS 161.59 AP - 00220694 3/9/2005 PEP BOYS 18.07 AP - 00220695 3/9/2005 PERFORMANCE AUTO BODY 1,972.17 AP - 00220697 3/9/2005 PMI 982.36 AP - 00220698 3/9/2005 POWER PLUS 25.00 AP - 00220698 3/9/2005 POWER PLUS 25.00 AP - 00220699 3/9/2005 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 143.01 AP - 00220700 3/9/2005 PRICE, ANDREA 39.00 AP - 00220701 3/9/2005 PRINCIPAL LIFE 15,964.83 AP - 00220702 3/9/2005 PRINCIPAL LiFE 1,661.75 AP - 00220704 3/9/2005 PROCAST PRODUCTS INC 20,203.13 AP - 00220704 3/9/2005 PROCAST PRODUCTS 1NC 3,450.00 AP - 00220705 3/9/2005 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 7.00 AP - 00220705 3/9/2005 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 7.00 AP - 00220706 3/9/2005 QUINTANA, ZITA 193.00 AP - 00220707 3/9/2005 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 32.50 AP - 00220707 3/9/2005 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 506.42 AP - 00220707 3/9/2005 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 109.04 AP - 00220707 3/9/2005 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 55.00 AP - 00220707 3/9/2005 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 115.12 AP - 00220707 3/9/2005 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 125.34 AP - 00220707 3/9/2005 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 32.89 AP - 00220707 3/9/2005 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 96.14 AP - 00220707 3/9/2005 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 448.27 AP - 00220707 3/9/2005 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 41.92 AP ~ 00220707 3/9/2005 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 70.35 AP - 00220707 3/9/2005 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 70.94 AP - 00220707 3/9/2005 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 30.35 AP - 00220707 3/9/2005 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 31.92 AP - 00220707 3/9/2005 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 407.79 AP - 00220707 3/9/2005 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 347.07 AP - 00220707 3/9/2005 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 31.92 AP - 00220707 3/9/2005 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 43.21 AP - 00220707 3/9/2005 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 55.00 AP - 00220707 3/9/2005 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 32.51 AP - 00220708 3/9/2005 R C PHOTOGRAPHY AND ASSOCIATES 390.00 AP - 00220709 3/9/2005 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 15.00 AP - 00220709 3/9/2005 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMME! 15.00 AP - 00220709 3/9/2005 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMME! 15.00 AP - 00220709 3/9/2005 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMME1 15.00 AP - 00220710 3/9/2005 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FAMILY YMCA 500.00 AP - 00220710 3/9/2005 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FAMILY YMCA 1,250.00 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT Page: 6 RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 03/30/5 Time~ I3:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/9/2005 through 3/29/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00220712 3/9/2005 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 9.70 AP - 00220713 3/9/2005 RE1NHARDTSEN, DEBRA 282.50 AP - 00220714 3/9/2005 REXEL CALCON 200.42 AP - 00220715 3/9/2005 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 321.96 AP - 00220715 3/9/2005 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 149.66 AP - 00220716 3/9/2005 RIVERSIDE CO DEPT CHILD SUPPORT 226.00 AP - 00220717 3/9/2005 RIVERSIDE CO DEPT CHILD SUPPORT 250.00 AP - 00220720 3/9/2005 SAN BERNARDINO CTY CHILD SUPPORT PAYM 213.50 AP - 00220721 3/9/2005 SAN BERNARDINO, CITY OF 600.00 AP - 00220721 3/9/2005 SAN BERNARDINO, CITY OF 600.00 AP - 00220721 3/9/2005 SAN BERNARD1NO, CITY OF 150.00 AP - 00220722 3/9/2005 SAN FRANCISCO MARRIOTT 599.28 AP - 00220723 3/9/2005 SAN FRANCISCO MARRIOTT 565.08 AP - 00220724 3/9/2005 SAN FRANCISCO MARRIOTT 565.08 AP - 00220725 3/9/2005 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 1,192.00 AP - 00220726 3/9/2005 SCMAF 1,764.00 AP - 00220727 3/9/2005 SCOTT, DIANA 250.00 AP - 00220728 3/9/2005 SCWMF 40.00 AP - 00220729 3/9/2005 SENECHAL, CALVIN 245.00 AP - 00220729 3/9/2005 SENECHAL, CALVIN 56.00 AP - 00220729 3/9/2005 SENECHAL, CALVIN 86.00 AP - 00220730 3/9/2005 SEQUEL CONTRACTORS INC 134,541.84 AP - 00220730 3/9/2005 SEQUEL CONTRACTORS INC 43,999.60 AP - 00220731 3/9/2005 SIERRA WHOLESALE HARDWARE INC 1,640.02 AP - 00220732 3/9/2005 SlLVER OAK DEVELOPMENT 1 LLC 8,370.00 AP - 00220733 3/9/2005 SMART AND FINAL 108.10 AP - 00220733 3/9/2005 SMART AND FINAL 102.77 AP - 00220733 3/9/2005 SMART AND FINAL 53.89 AP - 00220735 3/9/2005 SONITROL MANAGEMENT CORP 926.51 AP - 00220736 3/9/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL RAIL AUT] 800.00 AP - 00220737 3/9/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA RISK MANAGEMENT. 4,875.00 AP - 00220738 3/9/2005 SOUTHLAND SPORTS OFFICIALS 664.00 AP - 00220738 3/9/2005 SOUTHLAND SPORTS OFFICIALS 664.00 AP - 00220739 3/9/2005 STEELWORKERS OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION 708.33 AP - 00220740 3/9/2005 STOFA, JOSEPH 15.00 AP - 00220741 3/9/2005 SULLY-MILLER CONTRACTING COMPANY 3,690.00 AP - 00220741 3/9/2005 SULLY-MILLER CONTRACTING COMPANY -369.00 AP - 00220742 3/9/2005 TARGET 65.34 AP - 00220743 3/9/2005 TAUSSIG AND ASSOCIATES INC, DAVID 907.50 AP - 00220743 3/9/2005 TAUSSIG AND ASSOCIATES INC, DAVID 427.50 AP - 00220744 3/9/2005 TEMP POWER SYSTEMS 120.00 AP - 00220746 3/9/2005 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 1NC 1,088.28 AP - 00220748 3/9/2005 TRAFFIC CONTROL SUPERVISORS ASSOC SOU~ 35.00 AP - 00220749 3/9/2005 TRAFFIC SPECIALTIES INC 178.87 AP - 00220750 3/9/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 4,524.00 AP - 00220750 3/9/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 13,933.40 AP - 00220750 3/9/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 15,427.36 AP - 00220750 3/9/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 764.40 AP - 00220751 3/9/2005 UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION 1,311.00 AP - 00220753 3/9/2005 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P, 1,391.24 AP - 00220754 3/9/2005 UNITED TRAFFIC 94.50 AP - 00220754 3/9/2005 UNITED TRAFFIC 4,000.00 AP - 00220754 3/9/2005 UNITED TRAFFIC 118.53 AP - 00220754 3/9/2005 UNITED TRAFFIC 217.04 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 7 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 03/30/5 Time7 13:3 Check No. AP-00220754 AP-00220755 AP- 00220757 AP- 00220757 AP- 00220759 AP-00220759 AP-00220760 AP-00220762 AP-00220762 AP-00220762 AP-00220762 AP-00220762 AP-00220762 AP-00220762 AP-00220762 AP- 00220762 AP-00220762 AP-00220762 AP-00220762 AP- 00220762 AP- 00220763 AP- 00220764 AP- 00220765 AP-00220766 AP-00220766 AP-00220766 AP-00220766 AP-00220766 AP 00220766 AP 00220767 AP 00220767 AP 00220767 AP 00220768 AP 00220769 AP 00220770 AP 00220772 AP 00220772 AP 00220773 AP 00220773 AP 00220774 AP 00220775 AP 00220776 AP 00220777 AP 00220780 AP 00220780 AP 00220785 AP 00220785 AP 00220785 AP 00220785 AP 00220785 AP- 00220785 AP- 00220785 AP- 00220785 AP- 00220785 Check Date 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/9/2005 through 3/29/2005 Vendor Name UNITED TRAFFIC UNITED WAY UPS UPS VALLEY CREST TREE COMPANY VALLEY CREST TREE COMPANY VARSITY SCOREBOARDS VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VICTORIA ANIMAL HOSPITAL VOLM, LIZA WARD, DESIREE WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WEST COAST PIPE LINiNGS iNC WEST COAST PIPE LINiNGS INC WEST COAST PIPE LINiNGS INC WHITTIER FERTILIZER WlEEAC WlLBERTON, DENISE XEROX CORPORATION XEROX CORPORATION CMTA 2005 CONFERENCE CMTA 2005 CONFERENCE DOUBLE D PIPELINE 1NC DOUBLE D PIPELINE INC DUGAN, ALLISON REINHARDT, RITA LENZ, FRANK LENZ, FRANK SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON Amount 163.38 540.32 24.57 17.53 452.55 614.17 3,496.32 60.00 28.51 20.70 29.48 20.70 781.49 72.11 29.48 20.70 20.70 30.24 20.70 20.70 25.00 112.50 452.50 2,037.58 409.45 2,714.84 739.05 922.72 419.58 6,562.98 4,834.00 1,593.49 263.99 50.00 264.00 10,594.45 176.33 265.00 235.00 63,755.70 90,000.00 1,479.00 672.00 150.00 150.00 16.00 40.32 14.50 46.98 91.33 25.43 45.23 180.07 15.00 User: AHAWORTH - Arm Haworth Page: 8 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAITRC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 03/30/~ Time~ 13:3 Check No. AP 00220785 AP 00220785 AP 00220785 AP 00220785 AP 00220785 AP 00220785 AP 00220785 AP- 00220785 AP-00220785 AP-00220785 AP-00220785 AP 00220785 AP 00220785 AP 00220785 AP 00220785 AP 00220785 AP 00220785 AP 00220785 AP 00220785 AP 00220785 AP 00220785 AP 00220785 AP 00220785 AP 00220785 AP 00220785 AP 00220785 AP 00220785 AP 00220785 AP 00220785 AP 00220785 AP 00220785 AP 00220785 AP 00220785 AP 00220785 AP 00220785 AP 00220785 AP 00220785 AP 00220785 AP 00220785 AP 00220785 AP- 00220785 AP- 00220785 AP- 00220785 AP- 00220785 AP- 00220785 AP-00220785 AP-00220785 AP-00220785 AP-00220785 AP- 00220785 AP-00220785 AP-00220785 AP-00220785 AP-00220785 Check Date 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/I0/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/t0/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/9/2005 through 3/29/2005 Vendor Name SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON Amount 56.44 14.60 14.50 16.00 77.19 14.50 82.74 14.50 16.00 14.50 14.50 27.83 14.50 91.62 15.00 15.00 15.00 16.56 18.71 27.38 15.60 17.59 27.83 15.49 43.03 16.00 21.81 18.48 16.37 34.95 15.50 16.00 15.50 20.84 14.99 112.35 16.86 20.96 15.50 16.00 16.00 15.00 127.45 16.10 162.40 47.13 16.00 42.25 114.00 46.48 14.50 41.76 14.50 14.50 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 9 Report:CK AGENDA_REG PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 03/30/5 Time~ 13:3 Check No. AP-00220785 AP-00220785 AP-00220785 AP-00220785 AP- 00220785 AP-00220785 AP- 00220785 AP-00220785 AP-00220785 AP- 00220785 AP-00220785 AP-00220785 AP-00220785 AP-00220785 AP-00220785 AP-00220785 AP-00220785 AP-00220785 AP-00220785 AP- 00220785 AP-00220785 AP-00220785 AP-00220785 AP-00220785 AP 00220785 AP 00220785 AP 00220785 AP 00220785 AP 00220785 AP 00220785 AP 00220785 AP 00220785 AP 00220785 AP 00220785 AP 00220785 AP 00220785 AP 00220785 AP 00220785 AP 00220785 AP 0022O785 AP 00220785 AP- 00220785 AP- 00220785 AP-00220785 AP-00220785 AP-00220785 AP-00220785 AP- 00220785 AP-00220785 AP-00220785 AP- 00220785 AP-00220785 AP- 00220785 AP- 00220785 Check Date 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/I0/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A~enda Check ReRister 3/9/2005 through 3/29/2005 Vendor Name SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON Amount 15.00 14.50 15.36 14.50 364.50 14.50 14.50 17.12 15.26 489.49 82.19 77.75 86.76 22.00 28.59 265.52 28.36 523.17 95.76 14.99 14.75 14.50 15.10 15.60 101.48 15.60 14.50 4.74 26.28 24.56 16.00 16.76 14.50 14.50 14.50 14.50 15.86 16.00 16.37 14.50 17.48 15.60 253.66 14.99 100.91 58.07 ~4.5o 273.72 14.50 4,156.00 15.50 15.50 14.87 16.00 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 10 Report:CK_AGENDA KEG PORTKAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 03/30/5 Time~ 13:3 Check No. AP- 00220785 AP-00220785 AP-00220785 AP-00220785 AP-00220785 AP-00220785 AP-00220785 AP-00220785 AP-00220785 AP-00220785 AP-00220785 AP-00220785 AP-00220785 AP-00220785 AP-00220785 AP-00220785 AP-00220785 AP-00220785 AP-00220785 AP-00220785 AP- 00220785 AP- 00220785 AP- 00220785 AP-00220785 AP~00220785 AP-00220785 AP-00220785 AP-00220785 AP- 00220785 AP-00220785 AP-00220785 AP-00220785 AP-00220785 AP ~ 00220785 AP-00220785 AP 00220785 AP 00220785 AP 00220785 AP 00220785 AP 00220785 AP 00220785 AP 00220785 AP 00220785 AP 00220786 AP 00220786 AP 00220787 AP 00220790 AP 00220791 AP 00220791 AP- 00220792 AP-00220792 AP-00220793 AP- 00220794 AP-00220795 Check Date 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/10/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/9/2005 through 3/29/2005 Vendor Name SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUq~IERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFOKNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ABC LOCKSMITHS ABC LOCKSMITHS ABLAC ALTA LOMA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATES AMERICA WEST LANDSCAPE INC AMERICA WEST LANDSCAPE INC AMERICAN CLASSIC SANITATION INC. AMERICAN CLASSIC SANITATION INC. AMERICAN PACIFIC HOMES INC AMERICAN PACIFIC HOMES 1NC AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES Amount 16.00 16.60 16.00 91.00 16.10 16.10 16.10 57.61 14.50 14.60 165.51 74.74 56.29 14.50 97.28 12.45 15.50 20.83 86.33 2,549.13 27.14 17.72 14.50 40.40 14.50 113.52 15.10 14.50 14.50 16.00 103.48 129.36 15.50 40.61 16.00 27.53 14.75 68.46 15.00 15.00 126.38 67.04 160.56 1,703.15 112.50 16.39 3,700.00 2,000.01 -200.01 155.40 179.11 582.75 756.00 184.68 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 11 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRA1T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 03/30/5 TimT/ 13:3 Check No. Check Date AP - 00220797 3/16/2005 AP - 00220798 3/16/2005 AP - 00220798 3/16/2005 AP - 00220798 3/16/2005 AP - 00220798 3/16/2005 AP - 00220798 3/16/2005 AP - 00220798 3/16/2005 AP - 00220799 3/16/2005 AP - 00220799 3/16/2005 AP - 00220799 3/16/2005 AP - 00220799 3/16/2005 AP - 00220800 3/16/2005 AP - 00220801 3/16/2005 AP - 00220802 3/16/2005 AP - 00220803 3/16/2005 AP - 00220804 3716/2005 AP - 00220805 3/16/2005 AP - 00220805 3/16/2005 AP - 00220807 3/16/2005 AP - 00220808 3/16/2005 AP - 00220810 3/16/2005 AP - 00220811 3/16/2005 AP - 00220812 3/16/2005 AP - 00220813 3/16/2005 AP - 00220814 3/16/2005 AP - 00220814 3/16/2005 AP - 00220815 3/16/2005 AP - 00220815 3/16/2005 AP ~ 00220816 3/16/2005 AP - 00220817 3/16/2005 AP - 00220818 3/t6/2005 AP - 00220819 3/16/2005 AP - 00220820 3/16/2005 AP - 00220821 3/16/2005 AP - 00220822 3/16/2005 AP - 00220823 3/16/2005 AP - 00220824 3/16/2005 AP - 00220824 3/16/2005 AP - 00220826 3/16/2005 AP - 00220826 3/16/2005 AP - 00220827 3/16/2005 AP - 00220828 3/16/2005 AP - 00220829 3/16/2005 AP - 00220829 3/16/2005 AP - 00220830 3/16/2005 AP - 00220831 3/16/2005 AP - 00220832 3/16/2005 AP - 00220832 3/16/2005 AP - 00220832 3/16/2005 AP - 00220832 3/16/2005 AP - 00220832 3/16/2005 AP - 00220832 3/16/2005 AP - 00220832 3/16/2005 AP - 00220832 3/I6/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/9/2005 through 3/29/2005 Vendor Name ARCHITECTURE ONE ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION ASSI SECURITY ASSI SECURITY ASSI SECURITY ASSI SECURITY AUTO RESTORATORS INC B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE BARBER INC BASELINE HARDWARE BASSCO SPORTING GOODS BEARD PROVENCItER AND ASSOC BEARD PROVENCHER AND ASSOC CADY, COREY CAL PERS LONG TERM CARE CCAC CCPOA REGION 3 CCPOA REGION 3 CCPOA CERTIFIED AUTO CARE CERTIFIED AUTO CARE CHARTER MEDIA INC. CHARTER MEDIA INC. CHITWOOD CO, SCOTTY CLABBY, SANDRA CLAYTON, JANICE CLEARWATER POOLS CNOA REGION V CNOA REGION V COPP CRUSHING CO1LP, DAN CRAFCO 1NC D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY DAPPER TIRE CO DAPPER TIRE CO DE LEISE, JENAE DESIGNIT INC DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION EAKINS, TERRI EMPIRE FLOOR COVERING FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES Amount 1,370.00 1,633.27 96.90 341.30 341.30 94.86 341.30 105.00 1,680.00 893.00 167.50 7,476.72 530.78 2,000.00 10.43 134.27 8,635.00 2,280.00 450.00 315.92 395.00 40.00 40.00 30.00 999.84 584.03 1,195.20 820.80 99.00 1,000.00 30.54 45.00 45.00 45.00 10.00 258.60 374.97 193.95 1,381.88 1,381.88 519.24 575.39 42.16 93.53 440.00 210.00 505.75 696.00 651.00 840.00 868.00 840.00 720.00 720.00 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 12 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 03/30/7~ TimT~ 13:3 Check No. AP 00220834 AP 00220835 AP 00220836 AP 00220837 AP 00220839 AP 00220840 AP-00220841 AP-00220842 AP 00220843 AP 00220843 AP 00220844 AP 00220845 AP 00220846 AP 00220847 AP 00220847 AP 00220847 AP 00220847 AP 00220847 AP 00220847 AP 00220847 AP 00220847 AP 00220848 AP 00220848 AP 00220848 AP 00220848 AP- 00220849 AP- 00220850 AP- 00220852 AP-00220853 AP- 00220854 AP-00220854 AP-00220854 AP-00220854 AP-00220854 AP- 00220854 AP- 00220855 AP-00220855 AP-00220856 AP-00220858 AP-00220860 AP- 00220860 AP- 00220860 AP-00220860 AP-00220860 AP-00220860 AP-00220860 AP-00220860 AP-00220860 AP-00220862 AP-00220863 AP- 00220865 AP-00220867 AP-00220869 AP-00220871 Check Date 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/t6/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/i6/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/9/2005 through 3/29/2005 Vendor Name FISHER SCIENTIFIC FJS CABLE ENGINEERING INC FOOTHILL FAMILY SHELTER FORD OF UPLAND INC GEOFFREY BALL & ASSOC GEOGKAPHICS GILBERT, SUSAN GREATHOUSE, HOLLY GTSI CORP GTSI COILP H.B.I. INC. HADDON, DAWN HDL SOFTWARE LLC. HOLLIDAY ROCK CO ]NC HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC HOLLIDAY ROCK CO ]NC HOLLIDAY ROCK CO 1NC HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES HOOPER, ALISON HOPE THROUGH HOUSING FOUNDATION HULS ENVIRONMENTAL MGT LLC HUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN BERNARD1NO VALI HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS ]NC HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS ]NC HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS ]NC HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS ]NC IBM CORPORATION IBM CORPORATION INDEPENDENT ELECTRONICS INLAND EMPIRE TOURS AND TRANSPORTATIC INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN IOUG JEAN, LAURA LaLONDE, JOHN LASER TECHNOLOGY 1NC LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS LOYOLA, LISA Amount 247.27 1,000.00 417.00 6,083.58 10,622.86 5,389.64 250.00 34.00 17,005.36 1,217.47 150.00 104.16 5,000.00 49.34 259.68 280.57 205.26 407.30 245.94 240.89 281.24 319.22 3.52 34.77 37.66 750.00 5,000.00 8,327.50 270.00 55.19 316.87 200.00 24.78 31.63 72.36 209.04 849.66 434.84 1,957.00 164.45 108.10 158.70 225.40 386.40 179.40 215.05 326.60 326.60 125.00 351.40 1,250.00 224.43 900.00 11,500.00 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 13 Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 03/30/3 Timei~ 13:3 Check No. AP-00220873 AP-00220874 AP-00220874 AP-00220874 AP-00220874 AP- 00220874 AP- 00220874 AP- 00220874 AP- 00220874 AP-00220874 AP-00220874 AP-00220874 AP-00220874 AP-00220874 AP-00220874 AP-00220874 AP- 00220874 AP- 00220874 AP- 00220874 AP- 00220874 AP-00220874 AP-00220876 .AP-00220878 AP-00220878 AP-00220878 AP-00220878 AP-00220878 AP-00220879 AP 00220880 AP 00220882 AP 00220883 AP 00220883 AP 00220884 AP 00220885 AP 00220886 AP 00220887 AP 00220887 AP 00220887 AP 00220887 AP 00220888 AP 00220889 AP 00220890 AP 00220893 AP 00220893 AP 00220893 AP 00220893 AP 00220893 AP 00220893 AP-00220893 AP-00220893 AP-00220893 AP-00220893 AP-00220893 AP- 00220893 Check Date 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/9/2005 through 3/29/2005 Vendor Name MANELA, ROSARIO MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT 1NC MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT 1NC MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT [NC MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT 1NC MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT [NC MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT 1NC MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT [NC MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC MAR1POSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT [NC MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT 1NC MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT 1NC MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT [NC MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC MCCAULEY, STELLA MIDWEST TAPE MIDWEST TAPE MIDWEST TAPE MIDWEST TAPE MIDWEST TAPE MILLIKEN, KEELY NABER, ROBERT NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS INC NATIONAL CRIME PREVENTION COUNCIL NAT1ONAL CRIME PREVENTION COUNCIL NATIONAL DEFERRED NAVARRO, SANDRA NESTOR TRAFFIC SYSTEMS NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS NINYO AND MOORE GEOTECHNICAL OCLC INC OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT Amount 14.01 17,618.60 124.63 8,398.60 ~52.70 65.30 1,168.08 3,514.87 4,842.27 1,205.51 8,287.69 2,768.76 1,699.49 14,086.77 517.36 5,029.69 2,661.42 4,454.75 1,040.66 766.73 196.69 34.00 17.99 45.98 99.98 118.94 71.97 1,250.00. 47.50 143.52 132.75 308.50 15,113.84 32.00 32,631.43 46.28 92.56 46.28 92.56 3,142.44 1,004.75 17.31 109.97 361.58 1.23 6.68 68.79 114.47 17.24 18.53 465.07 2.13 -1.07 -1.07 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 14 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 03/30/5 Time/q 13:3 Check No. AP-00220893 AP- 00220893 AP- 00220893 AP- 00220893 AP-00220893 AP-00220893 AP-00220893 AP- 00220893 AP-00220893 AP- 00220893 AP-00220893 AP- 00220893 AP- 00220893 AP- 00220893 AP- 00220893 AP-00220893 AP-00220893 AP-00220893 AP 00220893 AP 00220893 AP 00220893 AP 00220893 AP 00220893 AP 00220893 AP 00220893 AP 00220893 AP 00220893 AP 00220893 AP 00220893 AP 00220893 AP 00220893 AP 00220893 AP 00220893 AP 00220893 AP 00220893 AP 00220893 AP 00220893 AP 00220893 AP- 00220893 AP- 00220893 AP- 00220893 AP- 00220893 AP- 00220893 AP- 00220893 AP- 00220893 AP- 00220893 AP-00220893 AP- 00220893 AP- 00220893 AP-00220893 AP- 00220893 AP- 00220893 AP- 00220893 AP- 00220893 Check Date 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/9/2005 through 3/29/2005 Vendor Name OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT 1.65 -0.84 5.92 18.64 q0.84 23.44 23.10 167.92 1,033.54 33.34 81.12 34.35 55.03 -28.32 104.75 79.11 18.32 5.30 44.25 107.44 7.82 -4.44 20.27 1.79 108.99 4.30 241.35 97.87 93.08 '115.18 12.73 95.43 18.69 20.00 24.39 7.91 12.20 150.90 9.75 102.09 75.55 80.95 4.20 89.72 71.20 8.36 81.92 18.99 12.02 272.36 47.33 58.79 291.98 234.10 Current Date: 03/30/~ User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 15 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time at ~13:3 Check No. Check Date AP - 00220893 3/16/2005 AP - 00220893 3/16/2005 AP - 00220893 3/16/2005 AP - 00220893 3/16/2005 AP - 00220893 3/16/2005 AP - 00220893 3/16/2005 AP - 00220893 3/16/2005 AP - 00220893 3/16/2005 AP - 00220894 3/16/2005 AP - 00220895 3/16/2005 AP - 00220896 3/16/2005 AP - 00220897 3/16/2005 AP - 00220898 3/16/2005 AP - 00220898 3/16/2005 AP - 00220899 3/16/2005 AP - 00220899 3/16/2005 AP - 00220900 3/16/2005 AP - 00220901 3/16/2005 AP - 00220901 3/16/2005 AP - 00220901 3/16/2005 AP - 00220901 3/16/2005 AP - 00220901 3/16/2005 AP - 00220901 3/16/2005 AP - 00220901 3/16/2005 AP - 00220901 3/16/2005 AP - 00220902 3/16/2005 AP - 00220903 3/16/2005 AP - 00220904 3/16/2005 AP - 00220904 3/16/2005 AP - 00220904 3/16/2005 AP - 00220905 3/16/2005 AP - 00220906 3/16/2005 AP - 00220909 3/16/2005 AP ~ 00220909 3/16/2005 AP - 00220912 3/16/2005 AP - 00220913 3/16/2005 AP - 00220913 3/16/2005 AP - 00220913 3/16/2005 AP - 00220913 3/16/2005 AP - 00220914 3/16/2005 AP - 00220915 3/16/2005 AP - 00220916 3/16/2005 AP - 00220917 3/16/2005 AP - 00220918 3/16/2005 AP - 00220918 3/16/2005 AP - 00220920 3/16/2005 AP - 00220920 3/16/2005 AP - 00220920 3/16/2005 AP - 00220920 3/16/2005 AP - 00220920 3/16/2005 AP - 00220920 3/16/2005 AP - 00220921 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/9/2005 through 3/29/2005 Vendor Name OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT P & R PRODUCTS COMPANY PACIFICARE OF CALIFORNIA PETERS, PATRICIA PIONEER MANUFACTURING POMA DISTRIBUTING CO POMA DISTRIBUTING CO POUK AND STEINLE INC. POUK AND STEINLE INC. PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC PRIZIO CONSTRUCTION INC PPdZIO CONSTRUCTION iNC PRIZIO CONSTRUCTION INC PRIZIO CONSTRUCTION INC PRIZIO CONSTRUCTION INC PRIZIO CONSTRUCTION INC PRIZIO CONSTRUCTION 1NC PRIZIO CONSTRUCTION INC QUINTANAR, VERTRELL RHFINC RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCI RANCHO CUCAMONGA F1REFIGHTERS ASSOCI RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCI RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE RCPFA RMA GROUP RMA GROUP SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SBC SBC SBC SBC SCHOLASTIC LIBRARY PUBLISHING SEELEY BROTHERS GENERAL CONTRACTORS SEIBEL, LOU SIMMONS, KISHA SMART AND FINAL SMART AND FINAL SO CALIF GAS COMPANY SO CALIF GAS COMPANY SO CALIF GAS COMPANY SO CALIF GAS COMPANY SO CALIF GAS COMPANY SO CALIF GAS COMPANY SOUNDZSKILZ ENTERTAINMENT SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON Amount 58.92 10.37 498.94 220.49 1,229.33 595.21 123.61 459.06 262.91 37,938.26 50.00 253.00 10,151.28 7,350.94 51,200.00 -5,120.00 6.81 24,517.17 -2,451.72 17,936.46 -1,793.65 4,012.63 -401.26 2,721.75 -272.17 29.40 127.89 35.00 35.00 35.00 21.55 6,150.65 492.00 1,962.50 21.90 57.04 9,051.33 2,738.22 57.23 117.70 20.00 14.00 45.00 50.90 86.51 464.71 524.93 793.26 284.22 4,027.86 338.68 300.00 2,224.56 963.55 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 16 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 03/30/5 Tim eT~l 3:3 Check No. AP-00220926 AP-00220926 AP-00220926 AP- 00220926 AP-00220926 AP-00220926 AP-00220926 AP-00220926 AP-00220926 AP-00220926 AP-00220926 AP-00220926 AP-00220926 AP-00220926 AP-00220926 AP-00220926 AP-00220926 AP- 00220926 AP- 00220926 AP- 00220926 AP-00220926 AP-00220926 AP-00220926 AP-00220926 AP-00220926 AP-00220926 AP-00220926 AP-00220926 AP-00220926 AP-00220926 AP-00220926 AP- 00220926 AP- 00220926 AP- 00220926 AP- 00220926 AP- 00220926 AP- 00220926 AP-00220926 AP-00220926 AP 00220926 AP 00220926 AP 00220926 AP 00220926 AP 00220926 AP 00220926 AP 00220926 AP 00220926 AP 00220926 AP 00220926 AP 00220926 AP 00220926 AP-00220926 AP-00220926 AP-00220926 Check Date 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 3/16/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/9/2005 through 3/29/2005. Vendor Name SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHER2q CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED1SON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHEKN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOU2~IERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON Amount 21,938.13 15.00 16.50 17.10 6,267.07 15.00 16.00 16.50 103.07 436.29 16.50 16.00 15.60 16.50 17.25 16.50 135.77 39.31 16.50 15.10 14.00 14.60 14.49 15.24 75.59 55.63 99.16 16.09 119.54 14.10 201.91 16.00 15.00 95.60 16.60 90.01 59.03 26.54 95.75 15.00 66.63 65.40 933.37 15.10 116.45 16.00 18.24 16.50 123.28 23.11 16.87 57.65 16.00 15.00 User: AHAWORTH - Arm Haworth Page: 17 Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 03/30/~ TiT~ 13:3 Check No. Check Date AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP ~ 00220926 3/16/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/9/2005 through 3/29/2005 Vendor Name SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFOKNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON Amount 78.23 15.00 15.00 15.86 1,346.25 1,230.70 73.88 106.60 16,120.80 1,371.90 57.75 16.56 83.07 15.75 29.53 24.20 317.53 113.34 17.25 239.43 58.56 16.48 16.00 16.98 15.50 15.50 437.26 15.00 13.26 16.50 40.66 67.56 75.65 196.75 27.54 176.71 145.57 97.71 123.79 29.01 116.08 28.85 18.56 15.23 43.80 15.23 15.13 162.27 3,999.12 18.49 14.50 16.50 21.75 21.75 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 18 Report:CK_AGENDA REGPORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 03/30/5 Tim~ ~1~ 13:3 Check No. Check Date AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220926 3/16/2005 AP - 00220927 3/16/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/9/2005 through 3/29/2005 Vendor Name SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUl'tERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN SOUTHERN SOUTHERN SOUTHERN SOUTHERN SOUTHERN SOUTHERN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CALIFORNIA EDISON CALIFORNIA EDISON CALIFORNIA EDISON CALIFORNIA EDISON CALIFORNIA EDISON CALIFORNIA EDISON CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON Amount 19.70 16.00 37.67 16.26 134.91 17.59 14.87 15.50 16.00 7.43 140.23 16.98 16.50 102.41 184.54 144.65 15.48 23.03 141.09 28.00 51.19 22.33 3,540.31 212.09 117.70 116.69 14.00 12,131.34 112.77 119.96 16.50 79.46 52.22 118.87 14.66 16.50 16.00 16.50 14.60 15.00 97.13 71.78 16.00 97.71 15.10 16.50 15.60 163.62 16.00 16.99 16.00 . 16.00 16.71 19,429.89 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 19 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 03/30/5. Timelq'l 3:3 Check No. Check Date AP - 00220927 3/16/2005 AP - 00220927 3/16/2005 AP - 00220927 3/16/2005 AP - 00220927 3/16/2005 AP - 00220927 3/16/2005 AP - 00220927 3/16/2005 AP - 00220927 3/16/2005 AP - 00220927 3/16/2005 AP - 00220927 3/16/2005 AP - 00220927 3/16/2005 AP - 00220927 3/16/2005 AP - 00220927 3/16/2005 AP - 00220927 3/16/2005 AP - 00220927 3/16/2005 AP - 00220927 3/16/2005 AP - 00220927 3/16/2005 AP - 00220927 3/16/2005 AP - 00220927 3/16/2005 AP - 00220928 3/16/2005 AP - 00220929 3/16/2005 AP - 00220929 3/16/2005 AP - 00220929 3/16/2005 AP - 00220931 3/16/2005 AP - 00220932 3/16/2005 AP - 00220932 3/16/2005 AP - 00220932 3/16/2005 AP - 00220932 3/16/2005 AP - 00220932 3/16/2005 AP - 00220933 3/16/2005 AP - 00220934 3/16/2005 AP - 00220935 3/16/2005 AP - 00220936 3/16/2005 AP - 00220936 3/16/2005 AP - 00220939 3/16/2005 AP - 00220939 3/16/2005 AP - 00220940 3/16/2005 AP - 00220941 3/16/2005 AP - 00220942 3/I6/2005 AP - 00220943 3/16/2005 AP - 00220944 3/16/2005 AP - 00220945 3/16/2005 AP - 00220946 3/16/2005 AP - 00220946 3/16/2005 AP - 00220947 3/16/2005 AP - 00220948 3/16/2005 AP - 00220950 3/16/2005 AP - 00220950 3/16/2005 AP - 00220951 3/16/2005 AP - 00220952 3/16/2005 AP - 00220952 3/16/2005 AP - 00220952 3/16/2005 AP - 00220953 3/16/2005 AP - 00220954 3/17/2005 AP - 00220954 3/17/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/9/2005 through 3/29/2005 Vendor Name SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNL~ EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SPAGNOLO, SAM STEELWORKERS OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION STEELWORKERS OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION STEELWORKERS OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION STERICYCLE INC STERLING COFFEE SERVICE STERLING COFFEE SERVICE STERLING COFFEE SERVICE STERLING COFFEE SERVICE STERLING COFFEE SERVICE SUN, THE SUNSHINE WINDOWS SYNERGY TARGET TARGET UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P, UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P, UNIQUE CREATIONS UNIQUE MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC UNITED WAY UPS VEND U CO VIGILANCE, TERRENCE VORTEX INDUSTRIES VORTEX INDUSTRIES WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WEST END YMCA/WEST END KIDS CLUB WEST END YMCA/WEST END KIDS CLUB WOLFF, STEVE XEROX CORPORATION XEROX CORPORATION XEROX CORPORATION ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY VERIZON WIRELESS - LA VERIZON WIRELESS - LA Amount I2,120.96 4,212.90 14,992.80 2,868.67 44.24 40,555.70 56.03 26.68 46.44 6,921.13 561.73 6,185.20 57.60 57.80 49.19 56.29 181.47 2,727.75 396.16 260.04 561.62 805.80 221.32 106.43 328.29 65.30 80.75 149.25 160.80 1,250.00 1,634.00 37.51 41.04 2,759.28 32,420.05 124.03 590.97 46.00 57.02 64.23 400.00 235.91 1,231.37 365.87 397.26 303.50 2,850.00 467.98 72.64 34.93 929.35 1,838.48 6,047.45 51.24 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 20 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 03/30/5 Ti~l~i~ 13:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/9/2005 through 3/29/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name AP- 00220954 3/17/2005 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA AP - 00220954 3/17/2005 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA AP- 00220956 3/17/2005 VERIZON AP- 00220956 3/17/2005 VERIZON AP- 00220956 3/17/2005 VERIZON AP- 00220956 3/17/2005 VEKIZON AP- 00220956 3/17/2005 VERIZON AP- 00220956 3/17/2005 VERIZON AP- 00220956 3/17/2005 VERIZON AP- 00220956 3/17/2005 VERIZON AP- 00220956 3/17/2005 VERIZON AP- 00220956 3/17/2005 VERIZON AP- 00220956 3/17/2005 VERIZON AP- 00220956 3/17/2005 VERIZON AP- 00220956 3/17/2005 VERIZON AP- 00220956 3/17/2005 VERIZON AP-00220956 3/17/2005 VERiZON AP-00220956 3/17/2005 VERIZON AP- 00220956 3/17/2005 VERIZON AP - 00220956 3/17/2005 VERIZON AP- 00220956 3/17/2005 VERIZON AP- 00220956 3/17/2005 VERIZON AP- 00220956 3/17/2005 VERIZON AP- 00220956 3/17/2005 VERIZON AP- 00220956 3/17/2005 VERIZON AP-00220956 3/17/2005 VERIZON AP- 00220956 3/17/2005 VERIZON AP - 00220956 3/17/2005 VERIZON AP- 00220956 3/17/2005 VERIZON AP- 00220956 3/17/2005 VERIZON AP- 00220956 3/17/2005 VERIZON AP- 00220956 3/17/2005 VERIZON AP- 00220956 3/17/2005 VERIZON AP- 00220956 3/17/2005 VERIZON AP- 00220956 3/17/2005 VERIZON AP - 00220956 3/17/2005 VERIZON AP- 00220956 3/17/2005 VERIZON AP- 00220956 3/17/2005 VERIZON AP- 00220956 3/17/2005 VERIZON AP- 00220956 3/17/2005 VERiZON AP- 00220956 3/17/2005 VERIZON AP- 00220956 3/17/2005 VERIZON AP- 00220956 3/17/2005 VERIZON AP- 00220956 3/17/2005 VERIZON AP- 00220956 3/17/2005 VERIZON AP- 00220956 3/17/2005 VERIZON AP- 00220956 3/17/2005 VERIZON AP- 00220956 3/17/2005 VERIZON AP- 00220956 3/17/2005 VERIZON AP- 00220956 3/17/2005 VERIZON AP- 00220956 3/17/2005 VERIZON AP- 00220956 3/17/2005 VERIZON AP- 00220956 3/17/2005 VERIZON AP- 00220956 3/17/2005 VERIZON Amouut 28.23 31.80 402.27 28.75 325.30 28.51 180.08 130.82 55.93 47.97 83.00 47.21 42.67 77.85 206.07 572.40 465.69 29.94 465.69 28.83 448.20 294.20 29.94 152.20 87.91 504.32 95.27 93.18 29.94 59.94 28.38 0.69 34.13 581.33 28.51 33.41 59.34 35.34 27.96 148.38 190.48 86.88 335.89 30.20 28.95 89.55 90.55 90.55 92.01 92.01 90.55 31.81 83.72 28.42 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 21 Current Date: 03/30/5 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Porlxait Layout Timp,~ t 13:3 / Check No. Check Date AP - 00220956 3/17/2005 AP - 00220956 3/17/2005 AP - 00220956 3/17/2005 AP - 00220956 3/17/2005 AP - 00220957 3/17/2005 AP - 00220958 3/17/2005 AP - 00220959 3/17/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/9/2005 through 3/29/2005 Vendor Name VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERiZON CASK N CLEAVER CUCAMONGA VALLEY CUCAMONGA VALLEY CUCAMONGA VALLEY CUCAMONGA VALLEY CUCAMONGA VALLEY CUCAMONGA VALLEY CUCAMONGA VALLEY CUCAMONGA VALLEY CUCAMONGA VALLEY CUCAMONGA VALLEY CUCAMONGA VALLEY CUCAMONGA VALLEY CUCAMONGA VALLEY CUCAMONGA VALLEY CUCAMONGA VALLEY CUCAMONGA VALLEY CUCAMONGA VALLEY CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT WATER DISTRICT WATER DISTRICT WATER DISTRICT WATER DISTRICT WATER DISTRICT WATER DISTRICT WATER DISTRICT WATER DISTRICT WATER DISTRICT WATER D1STRICT WATER DISTRICT WATER DISTRICT WATER DISTRICT WATER DISTRICT WATER DISTRICT WATER DISTRICT WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER D1STRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER D1STRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DlSTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT Amount 92.01 92.0l 29.48 28.95 32.45 3,549.95 51.00 255.18 337.98 709.20 236.43 576.72 77.03 438.13 52.08 23.63 94.63 21.33 49.78 143.63 39.43 109.13 41.73 66.68 55.53 194.74 125.33 112.68 34.83 136.15 1,416.01 128.96 101.18 367.65 646.18 171.33 169.03 173.63 70.13 72.78 105.78 90.83 117.18 258.63 305.78 137.88 147.08 114.76 136.73 171.23 20.18 200.08 29.38 670.33 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 22 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 03/30/5 Ti~l~ 13:3 Check No. Check Date AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP ~ 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220962 3/21/2005 AP - 00220964 3/23/2005 AP - 00220965 3/23/2005 AP - 00220966 3/23/2005 AP - 00220967 3/23/2005 AP - 00220967 3/23/2005 AP - 00220968 3/23/2005 AP - 00220968 3/23/2005 AP - 00220968 3/23/2005 AP - 00220968 3/23/2005 AP - 00220968 3/23/2005 AP - 00220968 3/23/2005 AP - 00220968 3/23/2005 AP - 00220968 3/23/2005 AP - 00220968 3/23/2005 AP - 00220969 3/23/2005 AP - 00220971 3/23/2005 AP - 00220972 3/23/2005 AP - 00220973 3/23/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/9/2005 through 3/29/2005 Vendor Name CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 3M LIBRARY SYSTEMS 3M LIBRARY SYSTEMS A- 1 FENCE AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC ABC LOCKSMITHS ABC LOCKSMITHS ABC LOCKSMITHS ABC LOCKSMITHS ABC LOCKSMITHS ABC LOCKSMITHS ABC LOCKSMITHS ABC LOCKSMITHS ABC LOCKSMITHS ABLAC AEG ARTS & EXHIBITIONS AG ENGINEERING INC ALLEN, SYLVESTER R Amount 137.88 90.61 344.88 36.80 78.18 149.48 712.53 126.48 81.63 83.93 52.08 662.62 48.63 226.53 232.18 75.88 46.33 60.13 101.53 78.18 128.78 18.40 235.73 163.28 45.18 155.23 331.08 73.13 80.83 142.58 67.83 33.68 70.13 264.38 273.58 320.73 6,970.00 248.91 I50.00 1,050.09 520.10 230.61 760.71 540.23 1,086.53 4,810.12 593.50 2,852.59 134.37 50.8l 273.17 1,495.00 1,644.17 56.85 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 23 Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 03/30/5 Check No. Check Date AP - 00220974 3/23/2005 AP - 00220975 3/23/2005 AP - 00220976 3/23/2005 AP - 00220977 3/23/2005 AP - 00220978 3/23/2005 AP - 00220979 3/23/2005 AP - 00220980 3/23/2005 AP - 00220981 3/23/2005 AP - 00220983 3/23/2005 AP - 00220984 3/23/2005 AP - 00220985 3/23/2005 AP - 00220986 3/23/2005 AP - 00220987 3/23/2005 AP - 00220988 3/23/2005 AP - 00220990 3/23/2005 AP - 00220990 3/23/2005 AP - 00220990 3/23/2005 AP - 00220991 3/23/2005 AP - 00220992 3/23/2005 AP - 00220993 3/23/2005 AP - 00220993 3/23/2005 AP - 00220994 3/23/2005 AP - 00220995 3/23/2005 AP - 00220995 3/23/2005 AP - 00220995 3/23/2005 AP - 00220995 3/23/2005 AP - 00220995 3/23/2005 AP - 00220995 3/23/2005 AP - 00220995 3/23/2005 AP - 00220997 3/23/2005 AP - 00220997 3/23/2005 AP - 00220999 3/23/2005 AP - 00221000 3/23/2005 AP - 00221001 3/23/2005 AP - 00221002 3/23/2005 AP - 00221003 3/23/2005 AP - 00221003 3/23/2005 AP - 00221003 3/23/2005 AP - 00221006 3/23/2005 AP - 00221007 3/23/2005 AP - 00221008 3/23/2005 AP - 00221009 3/23/2005 AP - 00221010 3/23/2005 AP - 00221011 3/23/2005 AP - 00221012 3/23/2005 AP - 00221013 3/23/2005 AP - 00221014 3/23/2005 AP - 00221016 3/23/2005 AP - 00221017 3/23/2005 AP - 00221017 3/23/2005 AP - 00221018 3/23/2005 AP - 00221019 3/23/2005 AP - 00221020 3/23/2005 AP - 00221021 3/23/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/9/2005 through 3/29/2005 Vendor Name ALTA FIRE EQUIPMENT CO AMAZON.COM CREDIT AMERICAN BUSINESS MACHINES INC. AMERICAN CLASSIC SANITATION INC. AMERICAN CONTRACTORS INC AMS PAVING INC APHRCK, LLC ARCH WIRELESS ASBURV ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES ASSI SECURITY ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS ASSOCIATED GROUP AT AND T AUDIO EDITIONS B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE B AND K ELECI~dC ~DtOLESALE B.V. PERFORMANCE BARNES AND NOBLE BARNHART INC BARNHART INC BARNI-IART INC BARNHART INC BARNHART INC BARNItART INC BARNHART INC BARNHART INC BARNHART INC BARNHART INC BENGTZEN, WANDA BENGTZEN, WANDA BISHOP, JENNIFER BODY SHOTS BRODART BOOKS BRUNSWICK DEER CREEK LANES BURR CYCLES INC JOHN BURR CYCLES INC JOHN BURR CYCLES INC JOHN CAL PERS LONG TERM CARE CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES CALSENSE CANADA, TA'MARA CARAWAY, ROBIN CARRILLO, TRINA CENTER ICE ARENA CENTRAL CITIES SIGNS INC CENTRAL CITIES SIGNS INC CERTIFIED AUTO CARE CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS CLARK, KAREN CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. Amount 27.78 230.89 75.00 179.11 1,000.00 1,000.00 950.00 1,122.28 1,794.92 295.00 17,856.00 1,618.59 2.62 8.58 149.50 108.53 247.66 20.00 194.38 44,180.50 66,642.00 229,126.89 419,628.57 14,705.55 -1,470.55 -41,962.86 -2,004.84 -53,071.88 -1,128.13 155.00 105.00 60.50 1,046.50 4,064.32 400.75 113.44 407.62 521.09 315.92 22.50 232.33 25.00 70,410.12 109.99 90.00 9.00 1,008.00 28.00 466.78 106.99 1,357.44 44.90 259.50 3.51 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 24 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 03/30/~ Check No. Check Date AP- 00221022 3/23/2005 CLASS AP- 00221022 3/23/2005 CLASS AP- 00221022 3/23/2005 CLASS AP- 00221022 3/23/2005 CLASS AP- 00221022 3/23/2005 CLASS AP- 00221022 3/23/2005 CLASS AP- 00221022 3/23/2005 CLASS AP- 00221022 3/23/2005 CLASS AP- 00221022 3/23/2005 CLASS AP- 00221022 3/23/2005 CLASS AP- 00221022 3/23/2005 CLASS AP- 00221022 3/23/2005 CLASS AP - 00221022 3/23/2005 AP - 00221023 3/23/2005 AP - 00221023 3/23/2005 AP - 00221024 3/23/2005 AP - 00221024 3/23/2005 AP - 00221024 3/23/2005 AP - 00221024 3/23/2005 AP - 00221024 3/23/2005 AP - 00221025 3/23/2005 AP - 00221025 3/23/2005 AP - 00221025 3/23/2005 AP - 00221025 3/23/2005 AP - 00221025 3/23/2005 AP - 00221025 3/23/2005 AP - 00221025 3/23/2005 AP - 00221025 3/23/2005 AP - 00221025 3/23/2005 AP - 00221025 3/23/2005 AP - 00221025 3/23/2005 AP - 00221025 3/23/2005 AP - 00221025 3/23/2005 AP - 00221025 3/23/2005 AP - 00221025 3/23/2005 AP - 00221026 3/23/2005 AP - 00221026 3/23/2005 AP - 00221026 3/23/2005 AP - 00221027 3/23/2005 AP - 00221028 3/23/2005 AP - 00221029 3/23/2005 AP - 00221030 3/23/2005 AP - 00221031 3/23/2005 AP - 00221031 3/23/2005 AP- 00221031 3/23/2005 AP - 00221032 3/23/2005 AP - 00221033 3/23/2005 AP - 00221034 3/23/2005 AP - 00221035 3/23/2005 AP - 00221035 3/23/2005 AP - 00221036 3/23/2005 AP- 00221038 3/23/2005 AP - 00221038 3/23/2005 AP - 00221038 3/23/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/9/2005 through 3/29/2005 Vendor Name SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS CLASS SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS CLAYTON GROUP SERVICES INC CLAYTON GROUP SERVICES INC CLOUT CLOUT CLOUT CLOUT CLOUT COAST RECREATION 1NC COAST RECREATION [NC COAST RECREATION 1NC COAST RECREATION 1NC COAST RECREATION [NC COAST RECREATION INC COAST RECREATION INC COAST RECREATION [NC COAST RECREATION [NC COAST RECREATION [NC COAST RECREATION [NC COAST RECREATION 1NC COAST RECREATION 1NC COAST RECREATION INC COAST RECREATION INC COASTAL BUILD[NG SERVICES [NC COASTAL BUILDING SERVICES INC COASTAL BUILDING SERVICES 1NC CODI COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY COMBINED MARTIAL SCIENCE INC COMSERCO INC. CONCENTRA MEDICAL CENTERS CONCENTRA MEDICAL CENTERS CONCENTRA MEDICAL CENTERS COPP CRUSHING CORP, DAN COURT TRUSTEE COURT TRUSTEE CREATIVE DATA PRODUCTS CREATIVE DATA PRODUCTS CSUS/USED OIL/HHW CONFERENCE CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT Amount 7,642.00 7,000.00 9,500.00 875.00 2,170.00 992.77 67.81 29.60 271.25 542.50 592.27 12,810.00 382.00 9,900.00 1,750.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 500.00 50.00 110.00 89.43 88.33 200.00 150.00 89.43 225.00 79.00 127.00 500.00 500.42 127.00 500.00 303.00 16,984.00 512.50 75.00 5.31 1,973.70 471.41 2,362.00 134.00 176.00 10.00 118.50 200.00 1,397.94 132.77 325.00 25.93 30.53 34.83 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 25 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 03/30/5 Check No. Check Date AP - 00221038 3/23/2005 AP - 00221038 3/23/2005 AP - 00221038 3/23/2005 AP - 00221038 3/23/2005 AP - 00221038 3/23/2005 AP - 00221038 3/23/2005 AP - 00221038 3/23/2005 AP - 00221038 3/23/2005 AP - 00221038 3/23/2005 AP - 00221038 3/23/2005 AP - 00221038 3/23/2005 AP - 00221038 3/23/2005 AP - 00221038 3/23/2005 AP - 00221038 3/23/2005 AP - 00221038 3/23/2005 AP - 00221038 3/23/2005 AP - 00221038 3/23/2005 AP - 00221038 3/23/2005 AP - 00221038 3/23/2005 AP - 00221038 3/23/2005 AP - 00221038 3/23/2005 AP - 00221038 3/23/2005 AP - 00221038 3/23/2005 AP - 00221038 3/23/2005 AP - 00221038 3/23/2005 AP - 00221038 3/23/2005 AP - 00221038 3/23/2005 AP - 00221038 3/23/2005 AP - 00221038 3/23/2005 AP - 00221038 3/23/2005 AP - 00221038 3/23/2005 AP - 00221038 3/23/2005 AP - 00221038 3/23/2005 AP - 00221038 3/23/2005 AP - 00221038 3/23/2005 AP - 00221038 3/23/2005 AP - 00221038 3/23/2005 AP - 00221038 3/23/2005 AP - 00221038 3/23/2005 AP - 00221038 3/23/2005 AP - 00221038 3/23/2005 AP - 00221038 3/23/2005 AP - 00221038 3/23/2005 AP - 00221038 3/23/2005 AP - 00221038 3/23/2005 AP - 00221038 3/23/2005 AP - 00221038 3/23/2005 AP - 00221038 3/23/2005 AP - 00221038 3/23/2005 AP - 00221038 3/23/2005 AP - 00221038 3/23/2005 AP - 00221038 3/23/2005 AP - 00221038 3/23/2005 AP - 00221038 3/23/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/9/2005 through 3/29/2005 Vendor Name CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY CUCAMONGA VALLEY CUCAMONGA VALLEY CUCAMONGA VALLEY CUCAMONGA VALLEY CUCAMONGA VALLEY CUCAMONGA VALLEY CUCAMONGA VALLEY CUCAMONGA VALLEY CUCAMONGA VALLEY CUCAMONGA VALLEY CUCAMONGA VALLEY CUCAMONGA VALLEY CUCAMONGA VALLEY CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT WATER DISTRICT WATER DISTRICT WATER DISTRICT WATER DISTRICT WATER DISTRICT WATER DISTRICT WATER DISTRICT WATER DISTRICT WATER DISTRICT WATER DISTRICT WATER DISTRICT WATER DISTRICT WATER DISTRICT WATER D1STRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER D1STRICT CUCAMOix/GA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT Amount 327.17 153.29 81.01 117.18 268.98 134.43 167.78 235.63 229.88 170.18 70.13 68.98 176.98 72.43 218.50 247.48 65.88 126.48 149.48 96.58 20.18 137.88 151.68 165.58 116.03 111.43 163.18 111.43 128.68 164.33' 196.63 223.65 141.33 126.83 144.78 118.33 52.08 140.18 77.03 120.63 216.08 191.93 313.83 127.53 229.88 180.43 22.48 182.61 34.83 78.71 78.72 123.03 198.83 116.03 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 26 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 03/30/5 Ti~:~l 3:3 Check No. Check Date AP - 00221038 3/23/2005 AP - 00221038 3/23/2005 AP - 00221038 3/23/2005 AP - 00221038 3/23/2005 AP - 00221038 3/23/2005 AP - 00221038 3/23/2005 AP - 00221038 3/23/2005 AP - 00221038 3/23/2005 AP - 00221038 3/23/2005 AP - 00221038 3/23/2005 AP - 00221038 3/23/2005 AP - 00221039 3/23/2005 AP - 00221039 3/23/2005 AP - 00221039 3/23/2005 AP - 00221040 3/23/2005 AP - 00221040 3/23/2005 AP - 00221040 3/23/2005 AP - 00221040 3/23/2005 AP - 00221041 3/23/2005 AP - 00221042 3/23/2005 AP - 00221045 3/23/2005 AP - 00221046 3/23/2005 AP - 00221047 3/23/2005 AP - 00221048 3/23/2005 AP - 00221049 3/23/2005 AP - 00221050 3/23/2005 AP- 00221051 3/23/2005 AP - 00221052 3/23/2005 AP - 00221052 3/23/2005 AP - 00221053 3/23/2005 AP - 00221054 3/23/2005 AP - 00221055 3/23/2005 AP - 00221057 3/23/2005 AP - 00221058 3/23/2005 AP - 00221060 3/23/2005 AP - 00221061 3/23/2005 AP - 00221061 3/23/2005 AP - 00221062 3/23/2005 AP - 00221062 3/23/2005 AP - 00221062 3/23/2005 AP - 00221062 3/23/2005 AP - 00221062 3/23/2005 AP - 00221062 3/23/2005 AP - 00221063 3/23/2005 AP - 00221063 3/23/2005 AP - 00221063 3/23/2005 AP - 00221063 3/23/2005 AP - 00221063 3/23/2005 AP - 00221063 3/23/2005 AP - 00221063 3/23/2005 AP - 00221064 3/23/2005 AP - 00221064 3/23/2005 AP - 00221065 3/23/2005 AP - 00221065 3/23/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/9/2005 through 3729/2005 Vendor Name CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CYBERCOM RESOURCES INC CYBERCOM RESOURCES INC CYBERCOM RESOURCES INC D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY DAGHDEVIRIAN, KATHY DANCE TERRIFIC DANKO INC DAWSON, MICHELE DELANY, DANI DELTA MICROIMAG1NG 1NC DEMCO 1NC DEMPSTER, KERI DENTAL HEALTH SERVICES DICK, ERIC DICK, ERIC DRACHAND, DI ANNE DUFFY, RICK DYNASTY GYM EFTYCHIOU, AUDREY EMCOR SERVICE ENGELKE, LINDA EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS EWlNG IRRIGATION PRODUCTS FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES FISHER SCIENTIFIC FISHER SCIENTIFIC FITCHRAT1NGS FITCHRATINGS Amount 489.78 210.22 142.97 411.58 183.88 54.38 173.53 106.83 204.58 81.02 104.39 525.00 175.00 4,550.00 549.53 596.94 260.76 885.71 715.50 3,191.97 7,200.00 396.16 473.10 1,849.10 1,663.48 288.00 82.80 50.00 50.00 1,263.00 1,533.00 2,370.90 300.00 13,750.00 7.54 93.42 62.43 13.20 21.70 19.66 15.20 15.49 15.97 840.00 459.00 306.00 868.00 960.00 810.00 680.00 1,151.81 267.80 99.00 99.00 User: AHAWORTH - Arm Haworth Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT Page: 27 RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 03/30/5 Tim~ 713:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/9/2005 through 3/29/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00221066 3/23/2005 FORD OF UPLAND INC 49.95 AP- 00221066 3/23/2005 FORD OF UPLAND [NC 33.42 AP - 00221067 3/23/2005 FORD PRINTING AND MAILING [NC 1,229.47 AP- 00221069 3/23/2005 FRITO LAY INC 233.67 AP- 00221070 3/23/2005 GAlL MATERIALS 4,282.77 AP- 00221071 3/23/2005 GARCIA, VIVIAN 28.75 AP- 00221072 3/23/2005 GARNER, CATHLEEN 51.03 AP- 00221074 3/23/2005 GEORAL INTERNATIONAL 165.00 AP- 00221075 3/23/2005 GIORDANO, MARIANNA 277.50 AP - 00221076 3/23/2005 GREENE AND ASSOCIATES 112.00 AP - 00221077 3/23/2005 GREG'S REFRIGERATION 5,300.00 AP- 00221078 3/23/2005 GRESSCO LTD' 1,204.04 AP- 00221079 3/23/2005 GTSI CORP 197.96 AP- 00221080 3/23/2005 GUTIERREZ, CARLOS 425.00 AP- 00221081 3/23/2005 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO 4,310.00 AP- 00221082 3/23/2005 HAKIMI, SUSAN 136.44 AP - 00221083 3/23/2005 HAMPTON, ANTONIA 624.30 AP- 00221084 3/23/2005 HANGER 18 LLC. 84.00 AP- 00221085 3/23/2005 HARDY, BRADLEY 260.50 AP-00221086 3/23/2005 HEILIG, KELLY 973.20 AP- 00221087 3/23/2005 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO 1NC 521.75 AP- 00221087 3/23/2005 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO [NC 556.08 AP - 00221087 3/23/2005 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO [NC 96.52 AP - 00221088 3/23/2005 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 43.44 AP - 00221088 3/23/2005 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 242.78 AP- 00221088 3/23/2005 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 249.81 AP- 00221088 3/23/2005 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 62.61 AP - 00221088 3/23/2005 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 22.92 AP - 00221088 3/23/2005 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 86.99 AP - 00221088 3/23/2005 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 30.05 AP- 00221089 3/23/2005 HOYT, RAYMOND 840.30 AP- 00221090 3/23/2005 HSU, STEVE 510.00 AP- 00221091 3/23/2005 HURST, CHERYL 288.50 AP- 00221092 3/23/2005 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS [NC 299.55 AP- 00221093 3/23/2005 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS [NC 100.00 AP- 00221093 3/23/2005 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS [NC 107.20 AP- 00221093 3/23/2005 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 100.00 AP- 00221093 3/23/2005 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 139.10 AP- 00221093 3/23/2005 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 100.00 AP- 00221093 3/23/2005 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS [NC 100.00 AP- 00221093 3/23/2005 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 100.00 AP- 00221093 3/23/2005 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS 1NC 100.00 AP- 00221093 3/23/2005 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS [NC 62.03 AP- 00221093 3/23/2005 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 44.60 AP- 00221093 3/23/2005 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS [NC 200.00 AP - 00221093 3/23/2005 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS [NC 200.00 AP- 00221093 3/23/2005 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS 1NC 200.00 AP- 00221093 3/23/2005 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 233.75 AP- 00221093 3/23/2005 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS [NC 200.00 AP- 00221093 3/23/2005 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 50.53 AP- 00221093 3/23/2005 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS [NC 100.00 AP - 00221093 3/23/2005 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS [NC 100.00 AP- 00221094 3/23/2005. INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY COMPANY 194.45 AP - 00221095 3/23/2005 INLAND FAIR HOUSING AND MEDIATION 30.00 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Ha~vorth Page: 28 Report:CK_AGENDAREG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 03/30/5 Time: 13:3 Check No. Check Date AP - 00221096 3/23/2005 AP - 00221097 3/23/2005 AP - 00221097 3/23/2005 AP - 00221097 3/23/2005 AP - 00221097 3/23/2005 AP - 00221098 3/23/2005 AP - 00221099 3/23/2005 AP - 00221099 3/23/2005 AP - 00221099 3/23/2005 AP - 00221099 3/23/2005 AP - 00221100 3/23/2005 AP - 00221101 3/23/2005 AP - 00221101 3/23/2005 AP - 00221102 3/23/2005 AP - 00221103 3/23/2005 AP - 00221104 3/23/2005 AP - 00221105 3/23/2005 AP - 00221106 3/23/2005 AP - 00221108 3/23/2005 AP - 00221110 3/23/2005 AP - 00221111 3/23/2005 AP - 00221112 3/23/2005 AP - 00221113 3/23/2005 AP - 00221114 3/23/2005 AP - 00221115 3/23/2005 AP - 00221116 3/23/2005 AP - 00221117 3/23/2005 AP - 00221118 3/23/2005 AP - 00221119 3/23/2005 AP - 00221119 3/23/2005 AP - 00221119 3/23/2005 AP - 00221119 3/23/2005 AP - 00221119 3/23/2005 AP - 00221119 3/23/2005 AP - 00221119 3/23/2005 AP - 00221119 3/23/2005 AP - 00221119 3/23/2005 AP - 00221119 3/23/2005 AP - 00221119 3/23/2005 AP - 00221120 3/23/2005 AP- 00221121 3/23/2005 AP - 00221122 3/23/2005 AP - 00221123 3/23/2005 AP - 00221124 3/23/2005 AP - 00221125 3/23/2005 AP - 00221126 3/23/2005 AP - 00221129 3/23/2005 AP- 00221130 3/23/2005 AP - 00221131 3/23/2005 AP - 00221132 3/23/2005 AP - 00221133 3/23/2005 AP - 00221133 3/23/2005 AP - 00221133 3/23/2005 AP - 00221134 3/23/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/9/2005 through 3/29/2005 Vendor Name INLAND GREENHOUSE INC INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN INLAND VALLEY DANCE ACADEMY INTRAVAIA ROCK AND SAND INC INTRAVAIA ROCK AND SAND INC INTRAVAIA ROCK AND SAND INC INTRAVAIA ROCK AND SAND INC JD CINC JONES AND MAYER LAW OFFICES OF JONES AND MAYER LAW OFFICES OF JONES, BOB T',V'S AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY KIDSART KOZLOVICH, DEBBIE KKAKOWER & ASSOCIATES LAM, JACK LENNAR HOMES INLAND DIVISION/U S HOME LIM, HEATHER LIVE OAK DOG OBEDIENCE LOS ANGELES COCA COLA BTL CO MAGRUDER, KAREN MAIN STREET SIGNS MARSHALL, SYLVIA MCI MDC RANCHO ONE LLC MICROAGE COMPUTERMART MICROAGE COMPUTERMART MICROAGE COMPUTERMART MICROAGE COMPUTERMART MICROAGE COMPUTERMART MICROAGE COMPUTERMART MICROAGE COMPUTERMART MICROAGE COMPUTERMART MICROAGE COMPUTERMART MICROAGE COMPUTERMART MICROAGE COMPUTERMART MILLS, CAREY MOBILE MODULAR MANAGEMENT CORP MOE, JOHN MOTOROLA COMMUN AND ELEC INC MOUNTAIN VIEW GLASS AND MIRROR MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR N M A DUES C/O DAVID MCDONALD NAT1ONAL CRIME PREVENTION COUNCIL NATIONAL DEFERRED NATIONAL EVENT SERVICES NATIONAL PEN CORPORATION NATIONS RENT NATIONS RENT NATIONS RENT NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS Amount 20.00 114.60 114.60 114.60 114.60 272.65 150.85 245.00 75.00 331.70 3,429.00 1,972.06 601.73 2,560.00 300.00 181.30 3,236.10 540.00 100.00 1,000.00 555.00 448.80 586.25 42.00 393.29 1,420.20 590.26 1,000.00 92.10 144.50 144.50 144.50 52.40 144.50 441.78 549.53 226.28 144.50 144.50 510.90 312.48 287.62 922.48 43.64 40.00 5.54 571.50 27,429.21 671.33 361.00 64.65 955.65 53.88 145.59 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 29 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 03/30/~ T~ 13:3 Check No. Check Date AP - 00221135 3/23/2005 AP - 00221137 3/23/2005 AP - 00221137 3/23/2005 AP - 00221137 3/23/2005 AP - 00221138 3/23/2005 AP - 00221138 3/23/2005 AP - 00221138 3/23/2005 AP - 00221138 3/23/2005 AP - 00221138 3/23/2005 AP - 00221138 3/23/2005 AP - 00221138 3/23/2005 AP - 00221138 3/23/2005 AP - 00221138 3/23/2005 AP - 00221138 3/23/2005 AP - 00221138 3/23/2005 AP - 00221138 3/23/2005 AP - 00221139 3/23/2005 AP - 00221139 3/23/2005 AP - 00221139 3/23/2005 AP - 00221139 3/23/2005 AP - 00221139 3/23/2005 AP - 00221139 3/23/2005 AP - 00221139 3/23/2005 AP - 00221140 3/23/2005 AP - 00221140 3/23/2005 AP - 00221140 3/23/2005 AP - 00221140 3/23/2005 AP - 00221140 3/23/2005 AP - 00221140 3/23/2005 AP - 00221140 3/23/2005 AP - 00221140 3/23/2005 AP - 00221140 3/23/2005 AP - 00221140 3/23/2005 AP - 00221140 3/23/2005 AP - 00221140 3/23/2005 AP - 00221140 3/23/2005 AP - 00221140 3/23/2005 AP - 00221140 3/23/2005 AP - 00221140 3/23/2005 AP - 00221140 3/23/2005 AP - 00221140 3/23/2005 AP - 00221140 3/23/2005 AP - 00221140 3/23/2005 AP - 00221140 3/23/2005 AP - 00221140 3/23/2005 AP - 00221141 3/23/2005 AP - 00221142 3/23/2005 AP - 00221142 3/23/2005 AP - 00221 I42 3/23/2005 AP - 00221143 3/23/2005 AP - 00221143 3/23/2005 AP - 00221143 3/23/2005 AP - 00221144 3/23/2005 AP - 00221145 3/23/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/9/2005 through 3/29/2005 Vendor Name NIELSEN, NETTLE OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CAL[F(3 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFO OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFG OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE OTSUKA, DENNIS OWEN ELECTRIC OWEN ELECTRIC OWEN ELECTRIC PAPA PAPA PAPA PACIFICARE OF CALIFORNIA PARK STEEL COMPANY 1NC 883.17 76.50 59.29 283.03 14.65 58.67 252.80 143.77 53.22 146.39 283.72 8.32 24.21 47.50 210.11 61.12 33.90 85.55 3.76 14.51 4.29 46.22 -3.76 13.49 17.16 51.30 25.15 228.82 35.23 48.48 12.90 25.67 92.60 6.73 36.61 28.89 154.28 152.65 148.11 30.08 32.31 85.82 64.64 97.96 110.39 9.00 18.12 30.74 77.04 165.00 110.00 110.00 51,994.45 20.00 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 30 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Porixait Layout Current Date: 03/30/~ Check No. AP-00221146 AP- 00221147 AP-00221148 AP- 00221149 AP- 00221151 AP~00221152 AP- 00221152 AP-00221153 AP- 00221154 AP-00221155 AP-00221156 AP-00221157 AP-00221158 AP-00221159 AP-00221160 AP-00221161 AP-00221162 AP- 00221164 AP-00221165 AP-00221165 AP-00221165 AP-00221165 AP-00221166 AP 00221166 AP 00221166 AP 00221166 AP 00221167 AP 00221167 AP 00221167 AP 00221167 AP-00221167 AP-00221167 AP-00221167 AP-00221167 AP-00221167 AP-00221167 AP- 00221167 AP-00221167 AP-00221167 AP-00221167 AP-00221167 AP- 00221167 AP ~ 00221167 AP-00221167 AP-00221168 AP-00221169 AP- 00221170 AP-00221171 AP-00221172 AP- 00221173 AP- 00221174 AP ~ 00221175 AP-00221175 AP-00221175 Check Date 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/9/2005 through 3/29/2005 Vendor Name PARKER, SHANNON PATEL, DIVYESH R PATRON, KATE PAVEMENT RECYCLING SYSTEM PHASE II SYSTEMS POMA DISTRIBUTING CO POMA DISTRIBUTING CO PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC PRECISION GYMNASTICS PRINCIPAL LIFE PRINCIPAL LIFE PRO SOUND PRO SWEEPERS PUNO, CLAIRE QUTNTANA, ZITA RHF INC RADFORD MCCLOUGH, LISA RE1NHARDTSEN, DEBRA REPUBLIC ELECTRIC REPUBLIC ELECTRIC REPUBLIC ELECTRIC REPUBLIC ELECTRIC REXEL CALCON REXEL CALCON REXEL CALCON REXEL CALCON RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON RICHARI)S WATSON AND GERSHON RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON RIVERSIDE AERIAL LABS RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT RIVERSIDE CO DEPT CHILD SUPPORT RIVERSIDE CO DEPT CHILD SUPPORT RONALD FREDRIKSEN SAFELITE GLASS CORP SAN ANTONIO COMMUNITY HOSPITAL SAN ANTONIO MATERIALS SAN ANTONIO MATERIALS SAN ANTONIO MATERIALS Amount 307.50 842.14 250.00 10.00 3,500.00 9,589.42 6,944.07 143.01 1,697.90 1,681.30 16,493.13 1,651.52 324.83 47.40 193.00 138.20 250.00 282.50 5,515.63 6,272.04 4,879.81 1,067.43 5.89 157.11 5.89 110.94 275.60 2,669.20 3,024.29 897.87 275.00 17.00 52.00 162.00 12,350.89 1,540.00 6,986.85 1,846.55 479.00 519.74 18,324.48 445.00 120.00 1,348.50 646.50 218.72 250.00 226.00 500.00 189.46 698.50 87.60 761.58 201.71 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 31 Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRA1T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 03/30/5 Check No. AP-00221178 AP-00221179 AP- 00221179 AP-00221180 AP- 00221181 AP-00221181 AP- 00221182 AP- 00221183 AP-00221t85 AP-00221186 AP-00221187 AP- 00221188 AP-00221189 AP-00221189 AP-00221189 AP-00221192 AP-00221193 AP- 00221194 AP-00221194 AP-00221195 AP-00221196 AP-00221197 AP- 00221197 AP- 00221197 AP-00221198 AP-00221198 AP-00221198 AP-00221199 AP-00221200 AP- 00221201 AP-00221201 AP 00221201 AP 00221202 AP 00221202 AP 00221202 AP 00221202 AP 00221202 AP 00221202 AP 00221202 AP 00221202 AP-00221202 AP- 00221202 AP-00221202 AP-00221202 AP-00221202 AP-00221202 AP-00221203 AP-00221204 AP-00221204 AP-00221205 AP-00221205 AP-00221207 AP-00221208 AP-00221209 Check Date 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2O05 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/9/2005 through 3/29/2005 Vendor Name SAN BERNARDINO CTY CHILD SUPPORT PAYM SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT SAN BERNARD[NO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT SAN DIEGO NATIONAL BANK SAN DIEGO NATIONAL BANK SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM CO INC SAN GABRIEL VALLEY WATER COMPANY SBC LONG DISTANCE SCOTT, DIANA SECC CORP SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES SIMPLOT PARTNERS SIMPLOT PARTNERS SIMPLOT PARTNERS SO CALIF GAS COMPANY SOUTHWEST TRAFFIC SYSTEMS [NC STANDARD PACIFIC OF INLAND EMPIRE STANDARD PACIFIC OF INLAND EMPIRE STOFA, JOSEPH STRATFORD, GAYLE SUNRISE FORD SUNRISE FORD SUNRISE FORD T AND D INSTALLATIONS T AND D INSTALLATIONS T AND D INSTALLATIONS TERRY, DONNA THOM, MICHELE THOMSON GALE THOMSON GALE THOMSON GALE TRUGREEN LANDCARE TRUGREEN LANDCARE TRUGREEN LANDCARE TRUGREEN LANDCARE TRUGREEN LANDCARE TRUGREEN LANDCARE TRUGREEN LANDCARE TRUGREEN LANDCARE TRUGREEN LANDCARE TRUGREEN LANDCARE TRUGREEN LANDCARE TRUGREEN LANDCARE TRUGREEN LANDCARE TRUGREEN LANDCARE TUTORWHIZ INC UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION UNDERGROUND SVC ALERT OF SO CAL UNDERGROUND SVC ALERT OF SO CAL UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P, UNITED WAY UPLAND TENNIS CLUB Amount 213.50 1,350,908.00 -35,544.00 143.88 41,962.86 1,470.55 390.32 1,000.00 2.00 250.00 1,000.00 534.71 1,170.17 3,827.00 5,224.00 515.18 595.00 1,000.00 75,000.00 15.00 135.00 822.13 1,417.71 196.60 19.05 817.53 756.23 250.25 109.45 53.19 44.05 2,468.00 22,784.77 574.22 5,128.04 3,200.40 1,755.43 352.67 2,883.92 861.84 603.34 63,825.31 18,964.86 50.37 14,807.93 15,954.64 994.70 320.00 3,404.00 119.00 182.00 1,387.25 540.32 845.10 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT Page: 32 RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 03/30/~ Time: 13:3 Check No. AP-00221210 AP-00221210 AP- 00221212 AP-00221212 AP-00221212 AP- 00221212 AP- 00221212 AP- 00221212 AP- 00221212 AP-00221212 AP-00221212 AP-00221213 AP-00221213 AP-00221213 AP- 00221213 AP-00221213 AP-00221213 AP-00221213 AP-00221213 AP- 00221213 AP-00221213 AP-00221213 AP-00221213 AP-00221213 AP-00221213 AP 00221213 AP 00221213 AP 00221213 AP 00221213 AP 00221213 AP 00221213 AP 00221213 AP 00221213 AP-00221213 AP- 00221213 AP-00221214 AP-00221215 AP- 00221216 AP-00221217 AP-00221218 AP-00221219 AP- 00221219 AP-00221219 AP-00221219 AP-00221219 AP-00221219 AP- 00221219 AP-00221220 AP- 00221221 AP-00221221 AP- 00221221 AP-0022122! AP- 00221221 AP-00221221 Check Date 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/20O5 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/9/2005 through 3/29/2005 Vendor Name URS CORPORATION URS CORPORATION VELOCITA WIRELESS VELOCITA WIRELESS VELOCITA WIRELESS VELOCITA WIRELESS VELOCITA WIRELESS VELOCITA WIRELESS VELOCITA WIRELESS VELOCITA WIRELESS VELOCITA WIRELESS VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VEKIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VEKIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VICTORIA ANIMAL HOSPITAL VIGILANCE, TERRENCE VOELTZ, KAREN VOLM, LIZA W A RASIC CONSTRUCTION COMPANY WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO WARD, DESIREE WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY Amount 8,071.26 1,038.82 118.95 178.42 29.73 29.74 208.16 951.58 832.64 237.90 386.58 28.27 29.48 67.73 28.27 21.38 27.53 60.94 28.27 20.48 28.92 56.54 87.72 61.49 34.30 57.69 29.94 20.48 41.18 20.48 28.51 20.48 20.48 28.27 20.70 25.00 475.00 22.00 112.50 1,000.00 270.24 180.58 51.17 19.88 366.35 20.90 9.59 452.50 448.84 663.44 318.79 318.79 457.02 436.66 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT Page: 33 RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 03/30/5 Time: 13:3 Check No. AP-00221221 AP-00221222 AP-00221222 AP-00221222 AP-00221222 AP-00221222 AP- 00221222 AP- 00221222 AP- 00221222 AP- 00221222 AP- 00221222 AP-00221222 AP-00221222 AP-00221222 AP-00221222 AP-00221223 AP-00221224 AP- 00221225 AP-00221227 AP- 00221227 AP-00221227 AP-00221227 AP-00221228 AP-00221228 AP 00221228 AP 00221229 AP 00221230 AP 00221232 AP 00221236 AP 00221236 AP 00221236 AP 00221236 AP 00221236 AP 00221236 AP 00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP- 00221236 AP- 00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP- 00221236 AP- 00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 Check Date 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/23/2005 3/24/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/9/2005 through 3/29/2005 Vendor Name WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WEST VALLEY MRF LLC WEST VALLEY MRF LLC WEST VALLEY MRF LLC WEST VALLEY MRF LLC WEST VALLEY MRF LLC WEST VALLEY MRF LLC WEST VALLEY MRF LLC WEST VALLEY MRF LLC WEST VALLEY MRF LLC WEST VALLEY MRF LLC WEST VALLEY MRF LLC WEST VALLEY MRF LLC WEST VALLEY MRF LLC WEST VALLEY MRF LLC WESTERN LAND PROPERTIES WESTERN PLUMBING WILBERTON, DENISE WSA US GUARDS CO [NC WSA US GUARDS CO INC WSA US GUARDS CO INC WSA US GUARDS CO INC XEROX CORPORATION XEROX CORPORATION XEROX CORPORATION ZAILO, ROBERT ZEE MEDICAL INC SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON Amount 561.55 354.96 444.72 135.52 80.52 47.96 132.44 53.90 45.10 108.46 48.40 48.84 40.70 443.02 80.92 3,100.00 82.35 264.00 2,941.13 2,208.00 5,583.40 1,288.11 1,794.04 150.53 150.53 37.20 22.58 1,068,152.63 100.11 78.33 82.39 16.00 16.50 16.63 61.34 119.26 19.48 16.13 17.26 26.26 80.30 16.86 75.47 94.28 16.00 16.00 15.13 16.00 15.50 44.45 33.66 139.72 23.11 58.55 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 34 Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 03/30/5 13:3 Check No. AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP- 00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP 00221236 AP 00221236 AP 00221236 AP 00221236 AP 00221236 AP 00221236 AP 00221236 AP 00221236 AP 00221236 AP 00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP- 00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 Check Date 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/9/2005 through 3/29/2005 Vendor Name SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHEKN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHEP, N CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON Amount 104.22 99.04 16.90 63.80 16.13 15.50 16.00 16.99 16.13 15.63 155.60 129.16 28.60 162.82 19.71 29.26 16.00 16.13 15.09 5,649.41 16.98 57.40 735.88 15.87 18.37 36.13 15.63 15.63 15.63 15.63 68.36 16.49 130.43 76.85 16.00 146.24 40.75 117.79 24.26 15.90 300.80 120.91 75.13 16.86 25.08 15.63 16.13 16.26 610.49 16.50 16.98 16.13 77.39 94.71 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 35 Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 03/30/5 Check No. AP- 00221236 AP- 00221236 AP-00221236 AP- 00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP- 00221236 AP- 00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP- 00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP-00221236 AP 00221236 AP 00221236 AP 00221236 AP 00221236 AP 00221236' AP 00221236 AP 00221236 AP 00221236 AP 00221236 AP- 00221236 AP- 00221236 Check Date 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA . Agenda Check Register 3/9/2005 through 3/29/2005 Vendor Name SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON Total for Check ID AP: Total for Entity: Amount 289.43 16.50 15.23 26.91 421.91 33.28 1,540.39 45.01 16.13 16.73 73.92 15.73 15.63 19.73 16.00 15.13 159.62 171.71 114.99 55.00 16.40 61.49 28.08 127.22 15.63 125.89 130.95 115.01 21.85 15.14 15.73 15.89 19.69 16.76 15.13 16.49 15.50 15.23 16.00 15.13 16.90 16.13 138.81 67.23 16.63 114.44 109.28 7.39 113.86 93.00 6,032,081.81 6,032,081.81 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 36 Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 03/30/5 I? A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTFIENT Staff Report DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: April 6, 2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Cindy Hackett, Associate Engineer~4;~ APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS AND PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM RAMONA AVENUE TO HERMOSA AVENUE, TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NO. 10250015650/1506025-1 (GENERAL FUND) RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve plans and specifications for the construction of the Foothill Boulevard Storm Drain Improvements and Pavement Rehabilitation from Ramona Avenue to Hermosa Avenue and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids". BACKGROUND / ANALYSIS The Foothill Boulevard Storm Drain Improvements and Pavement Rehabilitation sCOpe of work in general consists of, but not limited to, cold planing, crack sealing, rubberized overlay, asphalt paving, installation of certain concrete curb and gutter, tree removal, installation of storm drain with pertinent laterals and catch basins, traffic signal loops, re- striping and pavement markings. The project is to be funded from General funds, Account No. 10250015650/1506025-1. Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt per Article 19, Section 15301(c)of the CEQA guidelines. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Foothill Boulevard Storm Drain Improvements April 6, 2005 Page 2 The Engineer's estimate for the Foothill Boulevard Storm Drain Improvements and Pavement Rehabilitation is $1,241,500.00. Legal advertising is scheduled for April 12, 2005, April 26, 2005 and May 9, 2005, with bid opening at 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, May 24, 2005. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:LEH:Ieh Attachments FOOTHILL BOUI,EVARD STORM DRAIN AND PAVEMENT REHABILATION (FROM RAMONA AVENUE TO HERMOSA AVENUE) SITE CITY OF R~NCHO CUCAMONGA VICINITY. MAP ESOLUTION NO. O "ll I A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS AND PAVEMENT REHABILITATIQN FROM RAMONA AVENUE TO HERMOSA AVENUE IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for the "FOOTHILL BOULEVARD STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS AND PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM RAMONA AVENUE TO HERMOSA AVENUE".. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit; "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, May 24, 2005, sealed bids or proposals for the "FOOTHILL BOULEVARD STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS AND PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM RAMONA AVENUE TO HERMOSA AVENUE" in said City. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of FOOTHILL BOULEVARD STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS AND PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM RAMONA AVENUE TO HERMOSA AVENUE." RESOLUTION NO. April 6, 2005 Page 2 PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein before stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public work's project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. RESOLUTION NO. April 6, 2005 Page 3 The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Pad 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work herein before mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8. Th~ bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least 10% of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashiers' check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the Iow bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be 100% of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an RESOLUTION NO. April 6, 2005 · Page 4 amount equal to 100% of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. On the date and at the time of the submittal of the Bidder's Proposal the Prime Contractor shall possess any and all contractor licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; Including but not limited to a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) sufficient to cover all the work to be performed by the Prime Contractor in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code," Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, Engineering Counter, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and payment of $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS), said $35.00 (THIRTY- FIVE DOLLARS) is non-refundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional non-reimbursable payment of $15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). RESOLUTION NO. April 6, 2005 Page 5 The City of Rancho Cucamonga, reserves the right to reject any or all bids. Questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids for the "FOQTHILL BOULEVARD STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS AND PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM RAMONA AVENUE TO HERMOSA AVENUE" may be directed to: CINDY HACKETT, ASSOCIATE ENGINEER AND PROJECT MANAGER 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 909-477-2740, ext. 4066 By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this 6th day of April, 2005. Publish Dates: April 12, 2005, April 26, 2005 and May 9, 2005 RAN ENGINEERING H O C U C A M O N G A DEPARTMENT StaffR port DATE: April 6, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Jerry A. Dyer, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "RANCHO CUCAMONGA FAMILY SPORTS CENTER GENERATOR ENCLOSURE" AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" TO BE FUNDED FROM CAPITAL RESERVES ACCOUNT NUMBER 1025001-5602 AS APPROVED IN THE FY 2004/05 BUDGET RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve plans and specifications for the "Rancho Cucamonga Family Sports Center Generator Enclosure" and authorize the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids" to be funded from Capital Reserves account number 1025001-5602 as approved in the FY 2004/05 budget. BAC KG RO U N D/ANALYSIS Over the past few years, the Facilities team has retrofitted several buildings with electrical switchgear (transfer switches) to make these sites more useful during local emergencies. The Rancho Cucamonga Family Sports Center was designated as an evacuation shelter and therefore requires a secondary power spurce in the event of a primary power outage. The Public Works Maintenance Section has portable generators that are used throughout the City during emergencies and also for temporary use/events. A good example is; during the Grand Prix Fire these generators powered the temporary EOC, 9th St Yard and the PD Modulars. In addition they were staged at additional facilities including the RCFSC evacuation center. It was noted during the fires and previously during the installation of the switchgear at RCFSC, that a more secure location out of the posted Fire Lane was needed to house the generator to protect it from vandalism and to maintain Fire access. Staff has determined that the project is Categorically Exempt per Article19, Section 15301(a) of the CEQA guidelines. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Approval of Plans and Specifications for the "Rancho Cucamonga Family Sports Center Generator Enclosure" April 6, 2005 Page 2 The project plans were completed by Pitassi Architects, Inc. and approved by the Building & Safety Department, and the specifications approved by the City Engineer. The Engineer's estimate is $22,000 including a 10% contingency and $200 for printing services. Legal advertising is scheduled for April 12~h and 19th, a pre-bid job walk scheduled for April 27th at 1:00 p.m., and bid opening at 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, May 3, 2005, unless extended by Addenda. Respectfully submitted,. City Engineer WJO:JAD Attachments: Vicinity Map and Resolution ~ ~ ~4TH ST ~ 0 P~OJECT ' ~ LOCATION VICINITY MAP ~ RE OL T,ON NO. E-' !1 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "RANCHO CUCAMONGA FAMILY SPORTS CENTER GENERATOR ENCLOSURE" AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council has prepared specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for the "RANCHO CUCAMONGA FAMILY SPORTS CENTER GENERATOR ENCLOSURE". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council will receive at the OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK IN THE OFFICES OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ON OR BEFORE THE HOUR OF 2:00 P.M. ON TUESDAY, MAY 3, 2005 sealed bids or proposals for "RANCHO CUCAMONGA FAMILY SPORTS CENTER GENERATOR ENCLOSURE" in said City. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council, California, marked, "RANCHO CUCAMONGA FAMILY SPORTS CENTER GENERATOR ENCLOSURE". A Non-Mandatory Pre-Bid Job Walk is scheduled for Wednesday, April 27, 2005, at 1:00 p.m. at the Rancho Cucamonga Family Sports Center located at 9059 San Bernardino Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730, where bidders may review the site and present questions regarding the Bid Documents: Plans, Proposals, Specifications. PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not Resolution No. April 6, 2005 Page 2 less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provision of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: 2. 3. 4. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set Resolution No. April 6, 2005 Page 3 forth in Division 2, Pad 7, Chapter 1, Adicle 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (10%) of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the Iow bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into beiween him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess any and all contractors licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; including but not limited to a Class "B" (General Building Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulation adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the California Business and Professions Code, Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available atthe Resolution No. April 6, 2005 Page 4 office of the City Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS), said $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS) is non-refundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional non- reimbursable payment of $15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reject any and all bids. Questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids for the "RANCHO CUCAMONGA FAMILY SPORTS CENTER GENERATOR ENCLOSURE" may be directed to: Dale Catron, Facilities Supervisor Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 477-2730, ext. 4090 By order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this 6th day of April, 2005. ADVERTISE ON: April 12, 2005 and April 19, 2005 R A N C H O C U C A M O N ® A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT St Report DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: April 6, 2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Jerry A. Dyer, Senior Civil Engineer APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "LAKE PUMP EQUIPMENT VAULT AT RED HILL COMMUNITY PARK" AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" TO BE FUNDED FROM PD 85 ACCOUNT NUMBER 1848303-5650/1224848-0 AS APPROVED IN THE FY 2004/05 BUDGET RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve plans and specifications for the "Lake Pump Equipment Vault at Red Hill Community Park" and authorize the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids" to be funded from PD 85 account number 1848303- 5650/1224848-0 as approved in the FY 2004/05 budget. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The lake filtration equipment is housed in an underground vault and accessed via a metal-rung ladder. Due to the vault design, entry into it is governed by confined space entry procedures. These procedures require specialized training of any personnel entering the vault, specialized air sampling equipment, and two persons present during entry. The vault is accessed daily for maintenance procedures. This project will provide for the construction of a redesigned structure that mitigates the confined space issue, as well as replacing the entry ladder with a safer stair-step system. Staff has determined that the project is Categorically Exempt per Article19, Section 15301(a) of the CEQA guidelines. The project plans were completed by Pitassi Architects, Inc. and approved by the Building & Safety Department, and the specifications approved by the City Engineer. 5'2 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Approval of Plans and Specifications for "Lake Pump Equipment Vault at Red Hill Community Park" April 6, 2005 Page 2 The Engineer's estimate is $133,660 including a 10% contingency and $200 for printing services. Legal advertising is scheduled for April 12th and 19th, a pre-bid job walk scheduled for April 27~h at 10:00 a.m., and bid opening at 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, May 3, 2005, unless extended by Addenda. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:JAD Attachments: Vicinity Map and Resolution /ILDON AV~ GTH ST ONTA&IO CITY LIMIT ?R. OJECT LOCATION CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I.A~ PUMP EQUIPMIC'NT VAULT / BOAT HOUSE VICINITY MAP RESOLUTION NO. ~),~"' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "LAKE PUMP EQUIPMENT VAULT AT RED HILL COMMUNITY PARK" AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council has prepared specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for the "LAKE PUMP EQUIPMENT VAULT AT RED HILL COMMUNITY PARK". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council will receive at the OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK IN THE OFFICES OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ON OR BEFORE THE HOUR OF 2:00 P.M. ON TUESDAY, MAY 3, 2004 sealed bids or proposals for "LAKE PUMP EQUIPMENT VAULT AT RED HILL COMMUNITY PARK" in said City. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council, California, marked, "LAKE PUMP EQUIPMENT VAULT AT RED HILL COMMUNITY PARK". A Non-Mandatory Pre-Bid Job Walk is scheduled for Wednesday, April 27, 2004, at 10:00 a.m. at Red Hill Community Park located at 7484 Vineyard Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730, where bidders may review the site and present questions regarding the Bid Documents: Plans, Proposals, Specifications. PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles I and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the RESOLUTION NO. April 6, 2005 Page 2 locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provision of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set RESOLUTION NO. April 6, 2005 Page 3 forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (10%) of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check, cedified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the iow bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess any and all contractors licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; including but not limited to a Class "B" (General Building Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulation adoPted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the California Business and Professions Code, Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the RESOLUTION NO. April 6, 2005 Page 4 office of the City Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS), said $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS) is non-refundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional non- reimbursable payment of $15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reject any and all bids. Questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids for the "LAKE PUMP EQUIPMENT VAULT AT RED HILL COMMUNITY PARK" may be directed to: Jeff Barnes, City Parks/Landscape Maintenance Superintendent Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 477-2730, ext. 4180 By order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this 6th day of April, 2004. ADVERTISE ON: April 12, 2005 and April 19, 2005 ENGINEERING C H O C U C A M O N G A g E PAR T ~IE N T StaffR port DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: April 6, 2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Walter C. Stickney, Associate Enginee 'r~ APPROVAL OF PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES AND TO AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC INLAND EMPIRE TRAIL CONSTRUCTION FROM AMETHYST AVENUE TO ARCHIBALD AVENUE (PHASE II), TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NUMBER 1 110 316 5650/1520 110 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council approve the plans and specifications for the Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail Construction from Amethyst Avenue to Archibald Avenue (Phase II), and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids." BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail will eventually extend from the Los Angeles County line at Claremont to Riverside Drive in Rialto. Each city along the corridor is securing its own funding for their respective segments of the trail. This particular phase (Phase II - from Amethyst Avenue to Archibald Avenue) of the Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail is just one part of Rancho Cucamonga's multiphased program to construct the trail from Fontana to Upland. The City is pursuing various special funding sources from Federal to State to SANBAG in order to construct the trail throughout the City. Phase II has received a BTA (Bicycle Transportation Account) grant from the State to install the trail improvements from Amethyst Avenue to Archibald Avenue. These improvements consist of an equestrian trail CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT RE: Pacific Electric Trail Phase II April 6, 2005 Page 2 on the north side of the railroad corridor and a concrete bicycle/pedestrian trail on the south side. Signalized crossings will be installed at Amethyst Avenue and Archibald Avenue. Landscaping will also be included in the vicinity of the two streets. Construction is expected to commence in either late June or early July of this year. Respectfully submitted, WilliAm J. O Nell City Engineer WJO:WCS Attachments: Vicinity Map and Resolution PROJECT SITE  CITY OF RANCItO CUCAMONGA Phase I1 of Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail From Amethyst Ave. to Archibald Avd. ESOLOT,O NO. 0,5"' O A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC INLAND EMPIRE TRAIL CONSTRUCTION FROM AMETHYST AVENUE TO ARCHIBALD AVENUE (PHASE II), IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for "THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC INLAND EMPIRE TRAIL CONSTRUCTION FROM AMETHYST AVENUE TO ARCHIBALD AVENUE (PHASE II)". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, May 3, 2005, sealed bids or proposals for the "THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC INLAND EMPIRE TRAIL CONSTRUCTION FROM AMETHYST AVENUE TO ARCHIBALD AVENUE (PHASE II)" capital improvement project in said City. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC INLAND EMPIRE TRAIL CONSTRUCTION FROM AMETHYST AVENUE TO ARCHIBALD AVENUE (PHASE II)". PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of RESOLUTION NO. April 6, 2005 Page 2 Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein before stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public work's project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 pement in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. RESOLUTION NO. April 6, 2005 Page 3 Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work herein before mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least 10% of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashiers' check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the Iow bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be 100% of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to 100% of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. On the date and at the time of the submittal of the Bidder's Proposal the Prime Contractor shall possess any and all contractor licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable Paws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; Including but not limited to a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) or a combination of Specialty Class "C" licenses sufficient to cover all the work to be performed by the Prime Contractor in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto. RESOLUTION NO. April 6, 2005 Page 4 The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code," Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and payment of $45.00 (FORTY-FIVE DOLLARS), said $45.00 (FORTY-FIVE DOLLARS) is non refundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional non reimbursable payment of $25.00 (TVVENTY-FIVE DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga reserves the right to reject any or all bids. Questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids for "THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC INLAND EMPIRE TRAIL CONSTRUCTION FROM AMETHYST AVENUE TO ARCHIBALD AVENUE (PHASE II)" may be directed to: Walter C. Stickney, Associate Engineer at (909) 477-2740, ext. 4076. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this 6th day of April, 2005 Publish Dates: April 13 and April 20, 2005 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this 6th day of April, 2005. William J. Alexander, Mayor ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. April 6, 2005 Page 5 I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution Was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 6th day of April, 2005. Executed this 6th day of April, 2005, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk ADVERTISE ON: April 13 and April 20, 2005 RAN CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DEPAR?MENT Staff Report DATE: TO: FROM: BY: April 6, 2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Joe Stofa Jr., Associate Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF FINAL TRACT MAP 16279 LOCATED ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH SIDES OF HIGHLAND AVENUE, BETWEEN ETIWANDA AND EAST AVENUES SUBMITTED BY TOLL BROTHERS LAND DEVELOPMENT - APN: 227-472-28 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the subject Final Tract Map16279, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said resolution. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tract Map 16279 located on the north and south sides of Highland Avenue, between Etiwanda and East Avenues was approved by the Planning Commission on June 12, 2002 for the development of 79 single family lots. The Developer, Toll Brothers Land Development, previously submitted an agreement and security on July 2, 2003 to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements that were constructed during the summer months to avoid conflict with Etiwanda High School that began in September. The Final Tract Map 16279 includes the final 5 lots that were delayed pending vacation of a portion of Highland Avenue to the Developer. The transaction has been completed and the Final Tract Map is being submitted for approval. Respectfully submitted, City Engineer WJO:JS Attachment(s) TRACT NO. 16279 TOLL BROTHERS 79 LOT SUBDIVISION 1-210 CITY OF RANCI [O CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION VICINITY MAP /x title; A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 16279 WHEREAS, Tract 16279 submitted by Toll Brothers Land Development consisting of the final 5 single family lots located on the north and south sides of Highland Avenue, between Etiwanda and East Avenue was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the development of 79 single family lots on June 12, 2002 and is in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and Local Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that Act; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met by the entry into an Improvement Agreement on July 2, 2003 with Toll Brothers Land Development, as developer; and WHEREAS, said Developer submits for approval said Tract Map 16279 offering for dedication, for street, highway and related purposes, the streets delineated thereon and the easements dedicated thereon for storm drain, sidewalk, street tree and landscape purposes. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES, that with said Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security previously submitted by said developer and approved and signed by the Mayor, then said Tract Map 16279 is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record, RAN CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT SlaffR ort DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: April 6, 2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Michael Ten Eyck, Administrative Resource Manager APPROVAL OF A CHANGE ORDER, IN AN AMOUNT OF $210,800.00, FOR THE INSTALLATION OF ADDITIONAL TRANSFORMERS, SWITCHES, AND SERVICE LINE EXTENSIONS FOR NEW HOOKUPS AT VICTORIA GATEWAY, FOOTHILL CROSSINGS, & VICTORIA GARDENS, APPROVAL TO INCREASE THE AWARD TO THE POUK & STEINLE CONTRACT (CO 03-127) BY AN AMOUNT OF $210,800.00 FROM ACCOUNT NO. 17053035650/1382705-0 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended the City Council authorize the approval of a change order, in an amount of $210,800.00, for the installation of additional transformers, switches, and service line extensions for new hookups at Victoria Gateway, Foothill Crossings, & Victoria Gardens, approval to increase the award to the Pouk & Steinle Contract (CO 03-127) by an amount of $210,800.00 from Account No. 17053035650/1382705-0 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: On August 31, 2001, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council authorized the creation and operation of a municipally owned utility for the purpose of providing various utility services to the Victoria Arbors Master Plan Area. A critical element of the City's plans to serve this area was the construction of an electrical distribution system to relay energy from the City's substation and interconnection with Southern California Edison's transmission system, located at the southeast corner of Rochester Avenue and Stadium Parkway, to the Victoria Arbors Master Plan area. The City's electrical distribution has been completed and is currently supply energy to the Victoria Garden Regional Shopping Center. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT APPROVAL OF A CHANGE ORDER APRIL 6, 2005 PAGE 2 With the electrical distribution currently providing energy to the Victoria Arbors Master plan Area; City is in the position to provide energy to additional properties. Staff is currently working with developers to provide the energy needs of these developments. The additional services identified in the change order represent an expanded scope of work associated with the installation of additional transformers, switches, and service line extensions for new hookups at Victoria Gateway, Foothill Crossings, & Victoria Gardens. The additional work will provided electric services to these new hookups. As the contractor of the distribution system, Pouk & Stienle is uniquely qualified to provide construction and installation services for these vitally important and time-sensitive projects. It is recommended the City Council authorize the approval of a change order, in an amount of $210,800.00, for the installation of additional transformers, switches, and service line extensions for new hookups at Victoria Gateway, Foothill Crossings, & Victoria Gardens, approval to increase the award to the Pouk & Steinle Contract (CO 03-127) by an amount of $210,800.00 from Account No. 17053035650/1382705-0. Respectfully Submitted, / ' William/J. O'Neil ' City Engineer W JO:MT ?/ R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Staff Report DATE: TO:. BY: SUBJECq': April 6, 2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Mark Brawthen, Contract Engineer APPROVAL OF A REQUEST TO SUMMARILY VACATE EXCESS STREET RIGHT- OF-WAY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH HALF OF 7TM STREET, EAST OF THE CUL- DE-SAC TERMINUS OF 7TM STREET AND EAST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, V-199 - APN: 209-211-46 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution ordering the summary vacation of excess street right-of-way on the south half of 7th Street and east of the cul-de-sac terminus, east of Archibald Avenue and directing the City Clerk to present same to the County Recorder for recordation. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On June 21,2004, the Planning Commission approved DRC2003-01085, a request for development of an 81,464 square foot multi-tenant industrial building on 4.72 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 5) Development District. One of the conditions of approval for DRC2003-01085 is to vacate excess street right-of-way along the project frontage with 7th Street. The vacated excess right-of-way will be incorporated into the project site and maintained by the property owner. On January 23, 2002, the Planning Commission determined that the vacation of 7th Street between its cul- de-sac terminus east of Archibald Avenue and extending east to the intersection with Hermosa Avenue is in conformance with the General Plan and recommended that said vacation occur. Respectfully submitted, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ENGINEERING DIVISION William J. O'Neil City Engineer W JO:MB Attachments: Vicinity Map Resolution '72. VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE Z FOOTHILL -:-I 7TH STREET m 0 0 6TH STREET SAN BERNARDINO FRWY POMONA FRWY City of Rancho Cucamonga ENGINEERING DIVISION Item: Street Vacation V-199 Title: VICINITY MAP EXHIBIT: 1_ RESOLUTION ~).~.~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF EXCESS STREET EASEMENT RIGHT OF WAY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH HALF OF 7TM STREET, EAST OF THE CUL-DE-SAC TERMINUS OF 7TM STREET AND EAST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE WHEREAS, by Chapter 4, Article 1, Section 8330, of the Streets and Highway Code, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to summarily vacate the excess right- of-way located on the south half of 7~h Street, east of the cul-de-sac terminus, east of Archibald Avenue; and WHEREAS, on January 23, 2002, the Planning Commission determined that the vacation of 7~h Street between its cul-de-sac terminus east of Archibald Avenue and extending east to the intersection with Hermosa Avenue is in conformance with the General Plan and recommended that said vacation occur. WHEREAS, the City Council found by all the evidence submitted that the excess right- of-way is unnecessary for present or prospective public street purposes, it has not been used for more than five (5) consecutive years and no public money was expended for maintenance of same. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby makes its order vacating excess street easement right-of-way located on the south half of 7t~ Street, east of the cul-de-sac terminus, east of Archibald Avenue, as described in Exhibit "A" and shown on Exhibit "B." SECTION 2: That the subject vacation shall be subject to the reservation and exception, if any, for existing utilities on record. SECTION 3: That from and after the date the Resolution is recorded, said excess street easement no longer constitutes a public easement. SECTION 4: That the City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resolution to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. SECTION 5: That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution, and it shall thereupon take effect and be in force. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: __day of .,2005. William J. Alexander, Mayer THIENES ENGINEERING INC. 16800 VALLEY VIEW AVENUE LA MIRADA, CA 90638 January 18, 2005 J.N. 2383 SHEET 1 OF 1 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION STREET VA CA TION That portion of Lot 12, Section 14, Township 1 South, Range 7 West, according to Map of Cucamonga Lands, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as per plat recorded in Book 4 of Maps, Page 9, Records of San Bernardino County, State of California, described as follows: That portion of Parcel 3 of Document number 85-037109, recorded February 15, 1985, records of said county, lying easterly of that certain proposed curve having a radius of 56. O0 feet, as shown on Drawing Number 907, of the City of Ranch Cucamonga's Plan and Profile of Seventh Street, with an approved date of March 12, 1985, revised Apdl 2, 2002. Containing: 1,489 square feet more or less Exhibit "B" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. Robin R. Rush L.S. 6984 Expires 9/30/05 L:I23831ESMTS_LEGALStSTREET VACATION. duc Last updated 01/18/05 9:09 AM sc.E:,.., EXHIBIT 'B ' PLAT TO ACCOMPANY LECAL DESCRIPTION FOR CURVE TABLE' NUMBER DEL TA C ! 43'57'46" TANGENT TABLE' NUMBER D/STANCE T! 4005' 72 29. 00' TJ 70.5J' LEGEND: RADIUS LENGTH 56. 00' 42. 97' I O~ ? MA P .M.B. No. 56---57 CONTAINS: XXXX SO. I~. ~ ~~ Th/enes Engineering, CIVIL ENGINEERING · b~ND SURVEYING t6B~ VALLEY ~qEW AVENUE ~ ~//~ ~ ~1~ ~LI~RN~ ~0~38 ~ ~ ~(7t4~t-~tt g~pt4~2t-4tTJ 1 SURVEYOR: ROBIN R. RUSH Last Update:l/18/05 L.~, NO. 6984 L:\2383\ESktT$_LEGALSXSTREET VACATION.dwg REG. EXP. 9/30/05 PREPARED UNDER 7HE SUPERP?SION OF: ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Stafl:R ort DATE: TO:. BY: SUBJECT: April 6, 2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 AND STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7 FOR 5938 ETIWANDA AVENUE, LOCATED NORTH OF BANYAN STREET, SUBMITTED BY PACIFIC CREST COMMUNITI ES, INC. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject agreement, improvement securities and ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 7 for 5938 Etiwanda Avenue and authorizing the Mayor to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIR 5938 Etiwanda Avenue, located north of Banyan Street, in the Estate Residential District, is for the development of a 4857 square-foot single family residence on 0.63 acre of land. The Developer, Pacific Crest Communities, Inc., is submitting an agreement and improvement securities to guarantee the construction of the public improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond $12,700.00 Labor and Material Bond $6,350.00 Copies of the agreement and securities are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectf/ulty submitted, ' ~ Willia~m J~ O~Neil City Engineer W JO:wv Attachment W W O~ W INTERSTATE 21 0 WILSON AVE. BANYAN ST. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION N ITEM: TITLE: RESOLUTION NO. {~,~" 12.~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR 5938 ETIWANDA AVENUE WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on April 6, 2005, by Pacific Crest Communities, Inc., as Developer, for the improvement of the public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on 5938 Etiwanda Avenue, north of Banyan Street; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Securities, which are identified in said Improvement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES, as follows: That said Improvement Agreement, be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized tO execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and That said Improvement Securities are accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney. R.SO'UTION ,O. / A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 7 FOR 5938 ETIWANDA AVENUE WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "72 Act"), said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 7, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the 72 Act authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owner of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding the such provisions of the 72 Act related to the annexation of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the 'q'erritory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 72 Act to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 72 Act and/or Article XIIID applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have RESOLUTION NO. 5938 ETIWANDA AVENUE - DAVID SKOLNICK April 6, 2005 Page 2 declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO OUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The above recitals are all true and co[rect. SECTION 2: This City Council hereby finds and determines that: The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvements. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. Exhibit A To Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property To Be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: DAVID SKOLNICK The legal description of the Properties are: PARCEL B, AS DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE NO. 582 FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT, RECORDED SEPTEMBER 17, 2004, AS INSTRUMENT NO. 677935 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. The above described parcels are shown on sheet A-2 attached herewith and by this reference made a part hereof. A-1 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 313 STREET LtOl-n'~ MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND6 7 WILSON BANYAN AVE, ST CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA NORTi~ Exhibit B To Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2004/2005 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 (NORTH ETIWANDA) Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (LMD #7) represents landscape sites throughout the Etiwanda North Area. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those pamels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The various sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, paseos, street trees, community trails and Etiwanda Creek Park. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS) Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD #1 )) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 (NORTH ETIWANDA) Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (SLD #7) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets in what is termed the North Etiwanda area of the City. Generally, this area encompasses the area of the City east of Day Creek Channel and north of Highland Avenue within the incorporated area of the City. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the North Etiwanda area. B-1 Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2004/2005) For Project: 5938 Etiwanda Avenue Number of Lamps Street Lights 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L SLMD # 1 1' SLMD # 7 1' Community Trail Turf Non-Turf Landscaping DGSF SF SF Trees EA LMD # 7 6 *Existing items installed with original project Assessment Units by District Parcel D.U. S 1 S 7 L 7 1 I 1 1 I B-2 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2004/2005 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 (NORTH ETIWANDA): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $307.05 for the fiscal year 2004/05. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No, 7 (North Etiwanda): # of Assessment # of Rate Per Physical Units Factor Assessment Assessment Land Use Type Units Units Unit Revenue Single Family Parcel 1572 1.00 1572 $307.05 Comm/Ind. Acre 5 2.00 10 $307.05 TOTAL The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (5938 Etiwanda Avenue) is: 1 Unit x 1 A.U. Factor x $307.05 Rate Per A.U. = $307.05 Annual Assessment STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO, 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): $482,682.60 $3,070.50 $485,753.10 The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2004/05. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Tvpe Units Units Factor Units Unit Single Family Parcel 21,151 1.00 21,151 $17.77 $375,853.27 Revenue Multi-Family Unit 8,540 1.00 8,540 $17.77 $151,755.60 Commercial Acre 2,380.36 2.00 4,760.72 $17.77 $84,597.99 TOTAL $612,207.06 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (5938 Etiwanda Avenue) is: I Unit x 1 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $17.77 Annual Assessment C-1 5938 Etiwanda Avenue STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 (NORTH ETIWANDA): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $33.32 for the fiscal year 2004/05. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Family Parcel 1804 1.00 1804 $33.32 $60,109.28 Comm/Ind Acre 5 2.00 10 $33.32 $333.20 TOTAL $60,442.48 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (5938 Etiwanda Avenue) is: 1 Unit x 1 A,U, Factor x $33.32 Rate Per A.U. = $33.32 Annual Assessment C-2 5938 Etiwanda Avenue T H E CITY OF I~AN Cfl 0 C 0 CAM 0 N GA S affRepor DATE: TO:. FROM: April' 6, 2005 Mayor, Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Julie Ungashick, Management Analyst I Dawn Haddon, Purchasing Manager SUBJECT: APPROVAL AWARD AN ANNUAL CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE OF VARIOUS ASPHALT MATERIALS FROM HOLLIDAY ROCK IN THE AMOUNT OF $80,000 TO BE. FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NUMBER 1001316-5200, FOR THE REMAINDER OF FISCAL YEAR 04/05, WITH THE OPTION TO RENEW FOR FISCAL YEAR 2006-2007. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize a contract with Holiday Rock for the purchase of various asphalt material for an annual amount not to exceed $80,000 from fund number 1001316-5200, for the remainder of fiscal year 04/05, with the option to renew for fiscal year 2006-2007. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS In order to maintain streets and other city areas at their current level of service, staff will need to purchase asphalt materials on a regular basis. Engineering provided specifications to Purchasing for the required asphalt material needed. Purchasing prepared a formal Request for Bid and sent it to four (4) vendors. One (1) response was received. A analysis was done of the previous cost and due to current price increase trends for asphalt materials and associated products affecting all building materials, such as fuel, Purchasing feels the pricing is market reasonable. Engineering and Purchasing Staff, then determines that Holliday Rock is then the responsible bidder that meets the required specifications for this bid. In order to insure that the City is paying the best possible price for asphalt, Purchasing recommends again bidding asphalt for fiscal year 2007-2008. Respectfully submitted, Joe O'Neil~'--~ ~ City Engineer T H E C I T Y O F I~AN Cfi 0 C U CAM 0 NC.A StaffRe rt DATE TO: BY: SUBJECT: April 6, 2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Vicki Chilicki, Engineering Technician APPROVAL OF A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM JOHN C. AND STEPHANIE J. LARSON FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8887 HIDDEN FARM ROAD (APN: 1061-271-26- 0000) RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving a Real 'Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement requested by John C. and Stephanie J. Larson. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Per City Ordinance 58, as a general requirement for issuance of a building permit, for residential additions (over 650 sq. ft.) the property owner shall provide for the construction of missing public street improvements, fronting the property at 8887 Hidden Farm Road. However, since the Hidden Farm Road right-of-way has not been dedicated, and Hidden Farm Road is currently not a public street, the missing street improvements cannot be constructed at this time. The property owner is willing to provide a Lien Agreement for the future installation of the missing street improvements. Access to the property, from Carnelian Street, is provided by a private 32-foot wide easement for ingress and egress, prior to the City's incorporation. Hidden Farm Road has not been officially deemed a private street, by City Council action. Respectfully submitte~l, City Engineer WJO:VC:dlw Attachments RELOCATION MALOOF HOUSE PM: PM, MB48 PM~ MB10 76 thru0 PI PM3222 Ihru0 M! 31thru32 ~8thru0 PM 3113 MB159 ~1thru82 PRIVATE~ PM CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA E~GINR~ER/NG DIVZg/ON rl~M: UF.N ~k61[~.AMC~4'I' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A REAL PROPERTY CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM JOHN C. AND STEPHANIE J. LARSON AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Ordinance No. 58 on February 21, 1979, to establish requirements for the construction of public improvements in conjunction with building permit issuance, and WHEREAS, installation of curb, gutter, sidewalk, pavement, drive approach, street trees, street lights established as a prerequisite to issuance of a building permit for 8887 Hidden Farm Road has been met by entry into a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement by John C. and Stephanie J. Larson. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does accept said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement, authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder, of San Bernardino County, California. c H 0 CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DEPART~IENT Staff Report DA'I~ FROM: BY: SUBJECT: April 6, 2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Tasha Hunter, Public Service Tech I APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR TRACT 14496-1, LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF WILSON AVENUE AND DAY CREEK BOULEVARD, SUBMITTED BY GRANITE HOMES RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract 14496-1 were approved for an extension by the City Council on December 3, 2003, in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: Labor and Material Bond: Monumentation Cash Deposit $743,700.00 $371,850.00 $5,000.00 Some of the improvements to this tract (specifically the lot next to the model lots) still need to be completed. The model homes are being used for Granite Homes' 29-1ot project located to the north. The developer, Granite Homes, is requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's office. Respedti,~ely s..ubmitted,. Willia/m & O'Neil ' - City Engineer WJO:TCH Attachments GRANITE HOMES Building Quali.ty For A Lifetime 2 Park Plaza, Suite 700 Irvine, CA 92614 949.250.9229 Fax 949250.9231 March 9, 2005 Tasha Hunter, Public Service Tech I Community Development Dept./Engineering The City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 RE: Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 14496-! Dear Tasha: Granite Homes is requesting an extension to our Improvement Agreement for Tract 14496-1. We are in receipt of your letter dated January 27' 2005 and we have signed and enclosed the Improvement Agreement Extension form (in triplicate) along with a check for $298 payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. We are requesting this extension because some of the improvements to this tract (specifically the lot next to the model lots) still need to be completed and we are still using these models for our 29-1ot project located on Tract 16100. Please do not hesitate to call me if you should require additional information. My office number is 949/250-9229 x139. Thank you for your time and assistance with this matter. Sincerely, GRANITE HOM~S Michelle Prouty ProJect Coordinator Encl. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION BOUNDARY OF ANNEXATION NORTH fl NTS ITEM: Tract ~ TITLE: Rancho Etiwanda EXHIBIT: Vicinity Map A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 14496-1 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on April 6, 2005, by Granite Homes, as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the reaJ property specifically described therein, and generally located on the northwest corner of Wilson Avenue and Day Creek Boulevard; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Tract 14496-1; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. C H 0 CUCAMONGA 1~ NGIN~I~DING DI~ PA~T~II~NT Staff Report DATE: TO: BY: SUBJECT: April 6, 2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Tasha Hunter, Public Service Tech I APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR TRACT 16370, LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF CHURCH STREET AND ARBOR LANE, SUBMI'I-rED BY US HOMES CORPORATION RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract 16370 were approved by the City Council on February 18, 2004, in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: Labor and Material Bond: $402,400.00 $201,200.00 Due to unexpected rain delays the improvements were not completed. The developer, Us Homes Corporation, is requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's office. especpely submitted, City Engineer WJO:TCH Attachments March 3, 2005 Tasha Hunter, Engineering Department City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 RE: Improvement Agreement- Tract 16370 & 16371 Dear Tasha: Due to unexpected rain delays we are requesting an extension for the for our "Improvement Agreement", for Tracts 16370 and 1637~. Enclosed are our fees for both of these tracts. I~. Sincerely, ~r°ject M ana r~ 'Ka' 'mm a~'~ Lennar Corona ds · 39! N. Hain Street, Suite 300 · Corona, CA 92880-2006 Main: (95!) 8]_7-3500 · Fax: {95!) 8!7-3599 · lennarfamily.com - I '{~RAcT NO: .15o~ TRACT NO. 15~47 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 15716 TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 16370 VICTORIA ARBORS R SOLUT,ON NO. /£ 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 16370 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on April 6, 2005, by Us Homes Corporation, as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the northwest corner of Church Street and Arbor Lane; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Tract 16370; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. ~ A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPART~IENT Staff Report DA'I'E: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: April 6, 2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Tasha Hunter, Public Service Tech I APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR TRACT 16371, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF VICTORIA PARK LANE AND BASE LINE ROAD, SUBMITTED BY US HOMES CORPORATION RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract 16371 were approved by the City Council on November 5, 2003, in the following amounts: Faithful Pedormance Bond: Labor and Material Bond: $521,700.00 $260,850.00 Due to unexpected rain delays the improvements were not completed. The developer, Us Homes Corporation, is requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's office. Respect~ely submitted, Willian~ -J.-O'Neil City Engineer WJO:TCH Affachments March 3, 2005 Tasha Hunter, Engineering Department City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 RE: Improvement Agreement- Tract 16370 & 16371 Dear Tasha: Due to unexpected rein delays we are requesting an extension for the for our "Improvement Agreement", for Tracts 16370 and 1637~. Enclosed are our fees for both of these tracts. Sincerely, ..,.c. Project Manager ~ Lennar Corona ds · 391 N. Main Street, Suite 300 · Corona, CA 92880-2006 Hain: (95~.) 817-3500 · Fax: (951) 817-3599 · lennarfamily.com J L _J 5 o~ ~'~c'/~ TRAC~ NO. 15948 - 15947 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 15716 TRACT INDEX WITH PLANNING AREAS VICTORIA ARBORS A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 16371 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on April 6, 2005, by Us Homes Corporation, as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the southwest corner of Victoria Park Lane and Base Line Road; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Tract 16371; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. R A N C H O C U C A M O N GA FNGINI~I~DING DI~PADT~I~N ~ StaffRe rt DATE: TO: BY: SUBJECT: April 6, 2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Tasha Hunter, Public Service Tech I APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR TR 16432, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF 19TH STREET AND AMETHYST STREET, SUBMITTED BY CUCAMONGA VENTURES, LLC RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for TR 16432 were approved by the City Council on March 3, 2004, in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: Labor and Material Bond: Monumentation Cash Deposit $246,900.00 $123,450.00 '$3,800.0O Due to unexpected processing delays and construction setbacks the project exceeded the intended building schedule. The developer, Cucamonga Ventures, LLC, is requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's office. Respectively submitted, William J. O'Neil Cite Engineer WJO:TCH Attachments MANNING March 21, 2005 Ms. Tasha Hunter Community Development Depadment Engineering Division The City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91729 Re: Improvement Agreement Extension for TR 16432 Dear Ms. Hunter: We would like request an extension of the Improvement Agreement for the above referenced tract. We had unexpected processing delays and construction setbacks that caused our project to exceed our intended building schedule. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Z L,J Z I-- m HILLSIDE u~ o ROAD 0 RANCHO ~ ~ C~AM~GA ~ ~ ~ ~LEMON AVENUE 1 9TH ~ STRE~ / ~ 0 Z ROAD PHOdECT. 81TE VICINITY MAP CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION ITEM: 7'TE.~CT bq~? l &,~[-'~2. TITLE: ~/ I C l lkl l T y' EXI-LIBIT: .~ RESO, T,O. NO. q A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TR 16432 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on April 6, 2005, by Cucamonga Ventures, LLC, as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located at the southwest corner of 19th Street and Amethyst Street; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said TR 16432; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. R A N C H O CUCAMONGA E N G I N E E R I N G D E P A R T M E N T Staff Report DATE: TO: BY: SUBJECT: April 6, 2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Tasha Hunter, Public Service Tech I ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND, ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE LETTER OF CREDIT AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2001- 00805, LOCATED AT 10863 AND 10865 JERSEY BOULEVARD, SUBMITTED BY RALPH KARUBIAN, SOL STONE, MARCIA STONE, CHARLES KARUBIAN AND LAURENCE KARUBIAN RECOMMENDATION: The required improvements for DRC2001-00805 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond and accept a Maintenance Guarantee Letter of Credit. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: As a condition of approval of completion of DRC2001-00805, located at 10863 and 10865 Jersey Boulevard, the applicant was required to complete street improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City Council release the existing Faithful Performance Bond and accept the Maintenance Guarantee Letter of Credit. Developer: Release: Accept: Faithful Performance Bond # 3SM 050 276 00 (Bond No.) Maintenance Guarantee Letter of Credit # SB41349 (Letter of Credit No.) Ralph Karubian, Sol Stone, Marcia Stone, Charles Karubian and Laurence Karubian $163,100.00 $ 16,310.00 Respectfully submitted, Wilfiam O. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:TCH Attachment(s) N.T.$. FOOTHILL BI ~ AtN~OW HIGHWAY ,~'R~ ~yARD ~TI-! STREET A.T. ~'SF, City of Rancho Cucamon.qa RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2001-00805 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for DRC2001-00805 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: April 6, 2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Tasha Hunter, Public Svc. Tech I RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE CASH DEPOSIT FOR DRC2002-00187, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF CENTER AVENUE, SOUTH OF 7TH STREET, SUBMITTED BY 9101 CENTER AVENUE ASSOCIATES, LLC RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Cash Deposit, for DRC2002-00187, located on the west side of Center Avenue, south of 7th Street, submitted by 9101 Center Avenue Associates, LLC BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The required one-year maintenance period has ended, and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. DEVELOPER 9101 Center Avenue Associates, LLC 315 S. Beverly Dr., #301 Beverly Hills, Ca 90212-4309 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Cash Deposit #CR050997 $4,600.00 Resp~c, ffully submitted, / William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:tch Attachment · ARROW ROUTE ~: ~ z Z 6TH STREET 11 !1 / ~ STH S~EET ~ STREET City of Rancho Cucamonga ENGINEERING DIVISION Item: Staff Repod Title: Vicinity Map EXHIBIT: DRC2002-00187 R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A E N G I N E E R I N G D E P A R TM E N T St ff Report DA'I'E: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: April 6, 2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Tasha Hunter, Public Service Tech I ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE ALL BONDS AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR TR 12959-1 (RAILROAD CROSSINGS), LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF WHITE OAK AVENUE AND ARROW ROUTE, SUBMITTED BY CAPPELINO & ASSOCIATES RECOMMENDATION: The required improvements for TR 12959-1 (Railroad Crossings) have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release all Bonds. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: As a condition of approval of completion of TR 12959-1 (Railroad Crossings), located at the southeast corner of White Oak Avenue and Arrow Route, the applicant was required to complete street improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City Council release all existing Bonds and file a Notice of Completion. Developer: Cappelino & Associates Release: All Bonds Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:TCH Attachment(s) EXHIBIT "A" ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 3B AND 6 ;> .< © TACOMA DR, ARROW ROUTE PARCEL I PARCEL MAP 12959~i o° / , PARCEL PARCEL 2 3 PARCEL MAP 12959 I APN 209-471-0S I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA PM 12959 RESOLUTION NO. ¢,.~"/,,.,~! A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TR 12959-1 (RAILROAD CROSSINGS) AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for TR 12959-1 (Railroad Crossings) have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. 11'5 RANCHO CUCAMONGA E N G I N E E R I N G D £ P A R T M E N T DATE: TO: BY: SUBJECT: April 6, 2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Tasha Hunter, Public Service Tech I ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND, ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 15724, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF TERRA VISTA PARKWAY, EAST OF COYOTE CANYON PARK, SUBMITTED BY KB HOMES GREATER LOS ANGELES, INC. RECOMMENDATION: The required improvements for Tract 15724 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond and accept a Maintenance Bond. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: As a condition of approval of completion of Tract 15724, located on the south side of Terra Vista Parkway, east of Coyote Canyon Park, the applicant was required to complete street improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City Council release the existing Faithful Performance Bond and accept the Maintenance Bond. Developer: KB Homes Greater Los Angeles, Inc. Release: Faithful Performance Bond # 3S12723700 $120,800.00 (Bond No.) Accept: Maintenance Bond #3S12723700 $ 12,080.00 (Bond No.) Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:TCH Attachment(s) CITY OF RANCHO CUC3~-VIONGA N RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TR 15724 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for TR 15724 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. R A N C H 0 ENGINEERING C U CA M 0 N GA DEPARTMENT Staff Report DATE: April 6, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: BY: SUBJECT: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Jerry A. Dyer, Senior Civil Engineer ,~-,~/' Richard ©axaca, Engineering Technician .,~ RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND NO. SS4081 IN THE AMOUNT OF $613,419.25, FOR THE PHASE lA OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2001-01, CONTRACT NO. 02-075 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond No. SS4081 in the amount of $613,419.25 for the Phase lA of Community Facilities District 2001-01, Contract No. 02-075. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street and storm drain improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. Contractor: E.L. Yeager Construction Co., Inc. P.O. Box 87 Riverside, CA 92502 Resp.~ully submitted, VVilli~ J, O'Neil City Engineer WJO:JAD/RO:Is Attachments VICINITY MAP COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.2001-01 PHASEIA R A N C H 0 ENGINEERING C U C A M ON GA DEPARTMENT Staff Report DATE: April 6, 2005 TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Cindy Hackett, Associate Engineer ~ Richard Oaxaca, Engineering TechnF~Patr¢'~ RELEASE OF FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND NO. CD 6003 IN THE AMOUNT OF $126,128.00, FOR THE ETIWANDA AVENUE BIKE LANE AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT, CONTRACT NO. 03-047 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release Faithful Performance Bond No. CD 6003 in the amount of $128,128.00 for the Etiwanda Avenue Bike Lane and Sidewalk Improvement, Contract No. 03-047. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. Contractor: Olivas Valdez 846 North Charter Drive Covina, CA 91724 Res/~ully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:CH/RO:Is Attachments [2-.I R A N H 0 ENGINEERING C U C A M ON GA D E PART,lENT Staff Report DATE: April 6, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: BY: SUBJECT: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Jerry A. Dyer, Senior Civil Engineer ~ Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Technit:ian~,/~ ACCEPT THE IMPROVEMENTS IN PHASE 3A OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2003-01, INCLUDING STREET, STORM DRAIN, WATER MAIN, TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND FIBER OPTIC CONDUITS, CONTRACT NO. 03-135 AS COMPLETE, RETAIN THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND AS A GUARANTEE BOND, RELEASE THE LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $2,899,109.03 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council accept the Improvements in Phase 3A of Community Facilities District 2003-01, Including Street, Storm Drain, Water Main, Traffic Signals and Fiber Optic Conduits, Contract No. 03-135, as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion, retain the Faithful Performance Bond as a Guarantee Bond, authorize the release of. the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $2,768,209.00 six months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received and authorize the release of the retention in the amount of $136,610.45, 35 days after acceptance. Also, approve the final contract amount of $2,899,109.03. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The subject project has been completed in accordance 'with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The Improvements in Phase 3A of Community Facilities District 2003-01, Including Street, Storm Drain, Water Main, Traffic Signals and Fiber Optic Conduits scope of work consisted of construction of reinforced concrete pipe storm drains, street improvements including curb and gutter, asphalt concrete paving and base, medians, bus turnouts, traffic signals, safety lighting, signing and CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Accept Improvements in Phase 3A of Community Facilities District 2003-01 April 6, 2005 Page 2 striping, and water distribution system including appurtenant structures. Pertinent information of the project is as follows: Budgeted Amount: Account Numbers: Engineer's Estimate: City Council's Approval to Advertise: Publish dates for local paper: Bid Opening: Contract Award Date: Low Bidder: Contract Amount: 10% Contingency: Final Contract Amount: Difference in Contract Amount: $3,009,829.90 16143035650/1442614-0 $2,179,745.60 August 6, 2003 August 11 & 14, 2003 November 4, 2003 December 3, 2003 Sequel Contractors, Inc. $2,736,209.00 $273,620.90 $2,899,109.03 $162,900.03 (5.95%) The net increase in the total cost of the project is a result of seven (7) contract change orders. Notable overages were Contract Change Order No. 2 for constructing three (3) deep cut sewer laterals deleted from an earlier phase to avoid conflict with this phase, Contract Change Order No. 3 for developer requested water system changes which were reimbursed by developer, Contract Change Order No. 5 for additional excavation and removal of excess dirt between curb and proposed property line, and Contract Change Order No. 7 (Balancing Statement) for the final contract quantities being higher than estimated quantities. Respectfully submitted, WilliAm J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:JAD/RO:Is Attachments VICINITY MAP COMMUNITY FACILIT. IES DISTRICT NO. 200.3-01 RESOLUTION NO. ~,.~-,. /.~.~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE IMPROVEMENTS IN PHASE 3A OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2003-01, INCLUDING STREET, STORM DRAIN, WATER MAIN, TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND FIBER OPTIC CONDUITS, CONTRACT NO. 03-135 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the Improvements in Phase 3A of Community Facilities District 2003-01, Including Street, Storm Drain, Water Main, Traffic Signals and,Fiber Optic Conduits, Contract No. 03-135, has been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bemardino County. R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTNENT StaffR ort DATE: April 6, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Jerry A. Dyer, Senior Civil Engineer ~J~ Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Technic. Can SUBJECT: ACCEPT THE LANDSCAPING AND SIDEWALK IN PHASE lA OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2001-01, CONTRACT NO. 04-011 AS COMPLETE, APPROVAL TO APPROPRIATE $37,051.51 TO ACCOUNT NO. 16123035650/1442612-0 FROM CFD 2001-01 FUND BALANCE, RETAIN THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND AS A GUARANTEE BOND, RELEASE THE LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $946,815.75 RECOMMENDATION it is recommended that the City Council accept the Landscaping and Sidewalk in Phase lA of Community Facilities District 2001-01, Contract No. 04-011, as complete, approval to appropriate $37,051.51 to Account No. 16123035650/1442612-0 from CFD 2001-01 fund balance, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion, retain the Faithful Performance Bond as a Guarantee Bond, authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $827,058.40 six months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received and authorize the release of the retention in the amount of $41,352.92, 35 days after acceptance. Also, approve the final contract amount of $946,815.75. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The Landscaping and Sidewalk in Phase lA of Community Facilities District 2001-01 scope of work consisted of construction of sidewalk, driveways, access gates, curb and gutter, asphalt concrete paving and base, appurtenant structures, decorative lighting, landscaping and irrigation. Pertinent information of the project is as follows: CiTY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Accept Landscaping and Sidewalk in Phase lA of Community Facilities District 2001-01 April 6, 2005 Page 2 Budgeted Amount: Account Numbers: Engineer's Estimate: City Council's Approval to Advertise: Publish dates for local paper: Bid Opening: Contract Award Date: Low Bidder: Contract Amount: 10% Contingency: Final Contract Amount: Difference in Contract Amount: $909,746.24 16123035650/1442612-0 $697,621.00 August 6, 2003 August 11 & 14, 2003 December 9, 2003 February 18, 2004 Mega Way Enterprises $827,058.40 $82,705.84 $946,815.75 $119,757.35 (14.48%) The net increase in the total cost of the project is a result of twelve (12) contract change orders. Notable overages were Contract Change Order No. 12 (Balancing Statement) for the final contract quantities being higher than estimated contract quantities, Contract Change Order No. 7 for additional excavation as a result of a changed condition caused by numerous contractors installing facilities, and Contract Change Order No. 10 for removal and replacement of irrigation, planting and mow curb on the east side of Day Creek Boulevard necessary to match the grade of the back-on lots. Respectfully submitted, Willigm J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:JAD/RO:Is Attachments VICINITY MAP PH,~,SE lA O.F COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2001-01 . L~NDSCAPINO AND' SIDEWALK PROJECT LocATIoN RESOLUTION NO. 0,~""' /"~' ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE LANDSCAPING AND SIDEWALK IN PHASE lA OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2001-01, CONTRACT NO. 04-011 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the Landscaping and Side~valk in Phase lA of Community Facilities District 2001-01, Contract No. 04-011, has been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. c H 0 CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE: April 6, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: BY: SUBJECT: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Jerry A. Dyer, Senior Civil Engineer ~&~ Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Technifian ~ ACCEPT THE PHASES lB(B), 3B(A), AND 3B(B) OF CFD'S 2001-01 & 2003-01 FOR STREET, STORM DRAIN, AND RELATED IMPROVEMENTS ON FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, CONTRACT NO. 04-041 AS COMPLETE, RETAIN THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND AS A GUARANTEE BOND, RELEASE THE LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $1,695,814.62 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council accept the Phases lB(B), 3B(A), and 3B(B) of CFD's 2001- 01 & 2003-01 for Street, Storm Drain, and Related Improvements on Foothill Boulevard, Contract No. 04-041, as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion, retain the Faithful Performance Bond as a Guarantee Bond, authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $1,388,377.70 six months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received and authorize the release of the retention in the amount of $69,418.89, 35 days after acceptance. Also, approve the final contract amount of $1,695,814.62. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The Phases lB(B), 3B(A), and 3B(B) of CFD's 2001~01 & 2003-01for Street, Storm Drain, and Related Improvements on Foothill Boulevard scope of work consisted of street and storm drain improvements, water distribution and sanitary sewer systems, streetlights, etc. Pertinent information of the project is as follows: Budgeted Amount: $2,700,000.00 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Accept Phases lB(B), 3B(A), And 3B(B) of CFD's 2001-01 & 2003-01for Street, Storm Drain, and Related Improvements on Foothill Boulevard April 6, 2005 Page 2 Account Numbers: Engineer's Estimate: City Council's Approval to Advertise: Publish dates for local paper: Bid Opening: Contract Award Date: Low Bidder: Contract Amount: 10% Contingency: Final Contract Amount: Difference in Contract Amount: 16123035650/1442612-0 & 16143035650/1442614-0 $2,653,680.00 February 18, 2004 February 24 & March 2, 2004 April 20, 2004 May 5, 2004 Sequel Contractors, Inc. $1,388,377.70 $138,837.77 $1,695,814.62 $307,436.92 (22.14%) The net increase in the total cost of the project is a result of seventeen (17) contract change orders. Notable overages were Contract Change Order No. 2 for frontage improvements along the south side of Foothill Boulevard, Contract Change Order No. 3 for additional signage and striping on Foothill Boulevard, west of the 1-15 Freeway, Contract Change Order No. 5 for steel casing installation for water line on Foothill Boulevard under the 1-15 Freeway, Contract Change Order No. 6 for water line relocations, tie-ins and removal and replacement of 15-inch sewer line filled with sturry on Foothill Boulevard, Contract Change Order No. 16 for fiber optic conduits installed on Foothill Boulevard, and Contract Change Order No. 17 (Balancing Statement) for the final contract quantities being higher than the estimated quantities. Respectfully~s u bmitted., City Engineer W,JO:JAD/RO:Is Attachments ~iTf ~i LL ONTA~CI~ LIMIT F~OJECT f LOCATION ~CINI~ ~ RESOLUTION NO. (~.. l~5 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PHASES lB(B), 3B(A), AND 3B(B) OF CFD'S 2001-01 & 2003-01 FOR STREET, STORM DRAIN, AND RELATED IMPROVEMENTS ON FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, CONTRACT NO. 04-041 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the Phases lB(B), 3B(A), and 3B(B)of CFD's 2001-1 & 2003- 01 for Street, Storm Drain, and Related Improvements on Foothill Boulevard, Contract No. 04-041, has been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, 'a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. T H E C I T Y 0 F ID._AN CH 0 C g CAM 0 N GA SbffReport DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: April 6, 2005 Chairman and Members of the Redevelopment Agency Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Peter M. Bryan, Fire Chief Pamela Pane, Management Analyst II Dawn Haddon, Purchasing Manager Sam Dominick, Maintenance Officer APPROVAL FOR THE REPLACEMENT PURCHASE OF ONE (1) HAZARDOUS MATERIALS VEHICLE FROM KME FIRE APPARATUS OF ONTARIO, CA, IN THE AMOUNT OF $293,301.97 TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NUMBERS 1380501-5604 (DEPT OF HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT) $114~986.00 AND 2505801-5604 (FIRE PROTECTION-RDA CAPITOL OUTLAY-VEHICLE) $178,315.97 Recommendation It is recommended that the Redevelopment Agency Board and City Council authorize the replacement purchase of one (1) Hazardous Materials Vehicle for the Fire District, from KME Fire Apparatus of Ontario, CA, in the amount of $293,301.97, to be funded from account numbers 1380501-5604 (Department of Homeland Security Grant) $114,986.00 and 2505801-5604 (Fire Protection-RDA Capitol Outlay- Vehicle) $178,315.97. Back.qround The City Council approved the acceptance of the Department of Homeland Security Grant 2003, Part II, funds on November 19, 2003. The grant allowed for the partial purchase of this replacement hazardous materials vehicle. The remaining balance for the purchase was appropriated in the 04/05 FY Budget document. The Fire District has the responsibility for response, investigation, and mitigation of hazardous material incidents and hazardous material waste incidents within the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. The hazardous material unit responds to all such incidents and complaints of such incidents in order to mitigate the spill or release in a timely fashion to minimize the effect of such material on the citizens and the environment. Page 2 April 6, 2005 APPROVAL FOR THE REPLACEMENT PURCHASE OF ONE (1) HAZARDOUS MATERIALS VEHICLE To perform this mission, many different types of specialized equipment, materials, and resources are needed which cannot be carried on other apparatus. Having the resources available through the Fire District Hazardous Materials Program provides a significant cost savings to the community. The Hazardous Material unit currently being used is a 1986 Ford F-350 that was donated by the City and refurbished in 1998. Due to the growing needs and success of the Hazardous Material response and Small Quantity Generator program, the unit has been loaded to capacity and no longer meets the needs of the program. Much equipment that is required for mitigation or control of incidents is left off the unit and must be methodically stocked as a need arises which takes valuable time at the receipt of an alarm. The current unit is nearing 100,000 miles and is reaching the end of its useful life, which will result in increased maintenance costs. The purchase of a new hazardous material unit will allow all necessary equipment to be carried to eliminate the delay in response and also eliminate the excessive repairs on the old unit. The Fire District provided specifications to Purchasing for the vehicle. Purchasing prepared a formal Request for Proposal (RFP) and sent it to eighteen (18) vendors and posted the RFP to the Purchasing website. Two (2) responses and two (2) "No Bids" were received. A copy of the abstract of the proposals is attached for your review. After analysis of the proposals by Fire District and Purchasing staff, it has been determined that KME Fire Apparatus, bidding the 2005 Panther, is the lowest, most responsive, responsible bidder that meets the specifications required by the Fire District. Respectfully submitted, Peter M. Bryan Fire Chief T H E C I T ¥ 0 Memorandum DATE: TO: April 6, 2005 Chairman and Members of the Redevelopment Agency Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Dawn Haddon, Purchasing Manager CORRECTION TO RDA AGENDA, CONSENT CALENDAR, SECTION D, ~3 AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA, CONSENT CALENDAR, SECTION D, ~26 TO CORRECT TYPOGRAPHICAL ERROR FROM $144,966.00 TO 114,986.00 FOR A~NT NUMBER 1380501-5604 This memo serves as notification to correct typographical error made on the Redevelopment Agency agenda and the City Council agenda for April 6, 2005. Submitted staff report reflects the correct amount for account number 1380501-5604 (Department of Homeland Security Grant) in the amount of 114,986.00. RDA Agenda, Consent Calendar, Section D, #3 City Council Agenda, Consent Calendar, Section D, #26 Respectfully submitted, Dawn K. Haddon Purchasing Manager KME Ferrara Hazardous Materials 259,285.00 259,285.012 252,458.00 252,458.00 1 EA Response Unit Make KME Fen:ara Model 2005 Panther R136NWD [ngniter ISub Total 259,285.012 252,458.0( Other :Describe: :::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::: ::::: ::::: ::::: :::: N/A Delivery FOB: Destination (local Included ........ 2,000 0( ................................................. di ) .............................. · ::::::'::':':: .............................. 20,094.59 19,565.5( @7 Tax Sales Tax 75% Grand Total 279,379.59 272,023.5( OPTION DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE EXTENDED UNIT PRICE EXTENDED ITEM NO. PRICE PRICE 1 Tow Hooks included included 0.00 0.0( 2 Two (2) 110-Volt Shorline Connection- 361.0, 722.0( 1,040.00 2,080.0( 3 Battery Charger System 593.0( 593.0£ 809.00 809.0( 4 Scene Lights 220.0( 220.0( 1,062.00 1,062.0( 5 Siren 2,265.0C 2,265.012 2,075.00 2,075.0( 6 Command Light 11,640.0£ 11,640.0(; 17,007.00 17,007.0( 7 Rear Tow Eyes included included 418.00 418.0( 8 Sliding Tech-Ref Center Wall Option 15,000.0( 15,000.0C 12,000.00 12,000.0( 9 Storage Counters 750.0( 750.0( 1,750.00 1,750.0C 10 Work Station 2,560.0( 2,560.0C 1,900.00 1,900.0£ 11 Fume Hood 2,120.0( 2,120.0( 1,375.00 1,375.0( 12 Refrigerator 730.0( 730.0( 1,200.00 1,200.0( Grand Total with Options 285,390.59 279,568.50 C I T ¥ O F I~AN CHO CUCAM ONGA Staff Report DATE: TO: FROM: April 6, 2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, and City Manager Kimbedy S. Thomas, Management Analyst III SUBJECT: RE-CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT AN ORDINANCE THAT, ADOPTS BY REFERENCE, COUNTY ORDINANCE 3930, RELATING TO THE INSPECTION AND GRADING OF FOOD ESTABLISHMENTS BACKGROUND At a number of recent meetings, the City Council has considered the adoption by reference, of a County ordinance that would require food establishments to post letter grades. First reading was held on this item, on January 5, 2005, with the second reading on February 2, 2005, at which time it was continued to the March 2, 2005, Council meeting. At the March 2nd meeting, no motion was made and no action was taken on the proposed ordinance. Per Council Members' request, the proposed ordinance has been placed on the Agenda for reconsideration for the April 6th meeting. Thus, it is recommended that the City Council hold a public hearing for second reading, to reconsider adoption of the attached ordinance that adopts by reference, the County of San Bernardino Ordinance 3930, and amends Title 8 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. The County Department of Public Health, Division of Environmental Services, Public Health Program Manager, Terri Williams will be available at the meeting to answer any new questions. SUMMARY In June 2004, the County of San Bernardino adopted an ordinance that established a system of grading food establishments and provided for cities, at their option, to require food establishments to post the letter grade received from inspections that are already being conducted by the County. Currently, establishments are receiving the letter rating on a voluntary basis with those same results also posted on the County's website. The County has not notified the City that the letter grades would not be provided in the future, but as was noted by Terri Williams at the March 2, 2005, Council meeting presentation; Page 2 April 6, 2005 CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT AN ORDINANCE THAT, ADOPTS BY REFERENCE, COUNTY ORDINANCE 3930, RELATING TO THE INSPECTION AND GRADING OF FOOD ESTABLISHMENTS the placards may not be provided. This is a policy issue that may need further Board of Supervisors' clar!ficafion for cities that chose not to adopt this ordinance by reference. As is currently the case, the County Division of Environmental Health Services (EHS) will continue to do all inspections, regardless of action on this ordinance. This ordinance would not have any financial impact for the City, as the County is already conducting inspections in the City. According to the County, the goal of this ordinance was to assist in protecting the public health through public notification of the County's inspection results through grade postings. The County has asked each city to consider adopting this for implementation in their individual city. RECOMMENDATION For your reconsideration, it is recommended that the Council conclude the second reading and adopt the ordinance, that adopts by reference, the County ordinance relating to the inspection and grading of food establishments as: · The goal of this ordinance is to assist in protecting the public health by public notification of the County's inspection results through grade postings with a placard that is clearly visible to patrons; · The letter grade helps to assure patrons that the establishment is receiving their routine inspections by EHS; · The letter grade shows a measure of compliance with health regulations on the date of the inspection; and · The letter grade system provides the community one measure of the health and safety of the establishment and motivates restaurant owners to maintain the highest standards for Rancho Cucamonga. Respectfully submitted, Management Analyst III City Manager's Office Attachments -Memo/Letter to the Editor by Mayor Pro Tem Diane Williams (Dated: March 15, 2005) -County Chart of Cities Record of Action on Ordinance (Last Updated: March 23, 2005) -Staff Report (Continued-Second Reading: March 2, 2005)-Staff Report (Second Reading: February 2, 2005)-City Ordinance No. 739-County Ordinance No. 3930-California Restaurant Association Letter of Opposition (Received: January 25, 2OO5) -ABC-Retail Inspection Guide (Full County Packet) 167 MEMO DATE: TO: FROM: SUB3ECT: March 15, 2005 Mayor Bill Alexander Council members Rex Gutierrez, Dennis Michael, Sam Spagnolo Williams, Mayor Pro T~ Diane Reconsideration of Ordinance No. 739 Requiring restaurants to post letter grades The following letter was sent to the editor of the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin and San Bernardino County Sun: I am responding to your editorial of March 11 regarding the ordinance requiring restaurants to post their health department letter grades. The city council did not vote to require the posting of the grades knowing that restaurants with an "A" grade would post them anyway and any others would have incentive to get their grade to an A as soon as possible. There has been a misunderstanding that there will be no more health inspections. That is not the case; all food establishments in Rancho Cucamonga will continue to be inspected as before. However, since the misconception exists regarding the matter, at the next city council meeting I will ask to have the ordinance brought back for reconsideration at the April 6 city council meeting. -Diane 'Williams, Mayor Pro Tem, City of Rancho Cucamonga City Name ' Fii'~t R~ ng~ Second Rea~ing -Date~ ordi,ance ~:. ; ~ .~ ~ ~ · - ~ byC0un~iil' ' I~Y C0uhC j ~ iAdopted' Effective Date · ~ ~ ~ Com~tents~ ~. · IApple Valley 3/22/2005 4/12/2005 IBarstow 2/22/2005 3/8/2005 3/7/2005 4/7/2005 IBigBear Lake 10/t 1/2004 11/8/2004 11/08/04 12/08/04 IChino 11/16/2004 12/7/2004 12/7/2005 1/7/2005 IChinoHills xxxx 1/11/2005 1/11/225 2/11/2005 IColton 12/7/2004 2/15/2005 2/15/2005 3/15/2005 IFontana TBA IGrand Terrace 10/28/2004 xxxx 10/28/2004 11/28/2004 IHighland xxxx xxxx 1/25/2005 2/25/2005 ILoma Linda TBA IMontclair 3/7/2005 4/4/2005 IRanchoCucamonga* 1/5/2005 3/2/2005 XXXX XXXX No Motion Made 3/2/2005 IRedlands TBA IyUpland 1/10/2004 1/10/2005 1 /1 0~2005 2/24/2005 Yucaipa 10/25/2004 2/14/2005 2/14/2005 3/14/2005 ucca Valley 11/4/2004 12/2/2004 12/2/2004 1/2/2005 *Rancho Cucamonga to Reconsider Ordinance/2nd Reading-4/6/05 Notes no data or not applicable. ' ' Y'San B~rnardino Co T H E C t '[ Y O F I~AN CHO CI~CAH ONGA StaffR rt DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: March 2, 2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, and City Manager Kimberly S. Thomas, Management Analyst III CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT AN ORDINANCE THAT ADOPTS BY REFERENCE COUNTY ORDINANCE 3930, RELATING TO THE INSPECTION AND GRADING OF FOOD ESTABLISHMENTS (CONTINUED FROM FEBRUARY 2, 2005) RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council hold the public hearing on this matter to consider adoption of the attached ordinance that adopts by reference the County of San Bernardino Ordinance 3930, and amends Title 8 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. This item was continued from the February 2, 2005, City Council meeting. BACKGROUND, in June 2004, the County of San Bemardino adopted an ordinance that established a system of grading food establishments and provided for cities, at their option, to require food establishments to post the letter grade received from inspections that are already being conducted by the County. The goal of this ordinance was to assist in protecting the public health through public notification of the County's inspection results. The County asked each City to consider adopting this for implementation in their individual city. Therefore, this Ordinance was placed on the City Council agenda for consideration. The First Reading was held on January 5, 2005, with a Second Reading on February 2, 2005. At that meeting, the item was postponed to March 2, 2005. DISCUSSION At the February 2, 2005, meeting there were several points discussed by the Mayor and City Council, and the ordinance was continued to be considered by the entire five- member Council. The items for further discussion included: Page 2 March 2, 2005 CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT AN ORDINANCE THAT ADOPTS BY REFERENCE COUNTY ORDINANCE 3~)30, RELATING TO THE INSPECTION AND GRADING OF FOOD ESTABLISHMENTS The Council requested that public safety staff provide information about the differer~ce between the restaurant inspections, in which the results are publicly displayed as opposed to other violations, in which the results are not made public. During the Council discussion on this item, the example was discussed in which the names of retail establishments that are found to sell to minors are not released. On this matter, Lt. Tony Nicassio, researched this item with Glenn C. Lawrence, Chief of the Stop Tobacco Access to Kids Enforcement (STAKE) Enforcement, California Depadment of Health Services (Food, and Drug Branch); and it was determined that "due process rights" are needed for those who are under suspicion of selling tobacco to minors. As a result, specific data and information on businesses in violation of Penal Code Section 308.1, and in accordance with the "Stop Tobacco Access to Kids Enforcement (STAKE) Act" are not releasable by the Police Department. In addition, the County Division of Environmental Health Services (EHS) that does the restaurant inspections are different from the State and County "decoy" programs that are used periodically to survey and monitor the sale of tobacco to minors. Currently, to help to inform and educate our community and businesses about the laws regulating the sale of tobacco products, the City, the County, and the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce are working on efforts to expand these public education efforts and to analyze prospective ordinance changes and enforcement options. 2. The Council also requested further explanation of how the County's ranking syster~ works, and the process and timeliness of rectifying violations. In sqmmary., under the proposed County rating system, the letter grade would be based upon the final numerical percentage score set forth in the Food Program Official Inspection Report (OIR) as follows: (1) A grade of "A" shall indicate a final score of ninety percent (90%) or higher, as determined by the health official; (2) A grade of "B" shall indicate a final score of eighty-nine percent (89%) but not less than eighty percent (80%), as determined by the health official; (3) A grade of "C" shall indicate a final score of seventy-nine percent (79%) but not less than seventy percent (70%), as determined by the health official. Point deductions for violations found during an inspection are weighed according to the imminent risk to public health. Violations such as cleanliness and repair to walls, ceilings, floors, and tiles can only be a maximum of a 3-point deduction for all found on any given inspection. Most commonly, it is a 1-point deduction. Page 3 March 2, 2005 CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT AN ORDINANCE THAT ADOPTS BY REFERENCE COUNTY ORDINANCE 3930, RELATING TO THE INSPECTION AND GRADING OF FOOD ESTABLISHMENTS Violations such as improper food temperature, vermin infestation, and improper food handling practices range from a 3 to a 6 point deduction. Any food establishment that fails to attain a score of at least 80% (a "B" letter grade) would receive written notice of the deficiencies. The food establishment would then have 30 days to correct the deficiencies and file a written request for a re-score inspection provided by the County. Any establishment that would fail to comply with the written notice, or that fails to attain an 80% on the re-score could be immediately closed by the County until they would achieve a score of at least 80%. In addition, any establishment that is determined to pose an imminent health hazard would be subject to immediate closure regardless of the inspection score. As is currently the case, the County Division of Environmental Health Services (EHS) would continue to do all inspections. The initial inspection would not cost the establishment but a re-score inspection would cost the establishment $52 per hour. The fee would be collected by the County to recover their costs for the re- score re-inspection. This ordinance would not have any financial impact for the City, as the County is already conducting inspections in the City. Staff and representatives from the County Department of Public Health, the Police Department, and Building and Safety Division will be available at the meeting to answer questions. Respectfully submitted, Kimbedy S. Thomas Management Analyst ill City Manager's Office Attachments -Staff Report (Second Reading: February 2, 2005) -City Ordinance No. 739 -County Ordinance No. 3930 -California Restaurant Association Letter of Opposition (Received: January 25, 2005) T H C I T Y O F !~ANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: February 2, 2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Duane A. Baker, Assistant to the City Manager CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT AN ORDINANCE THAT ADOPTS BY REFERENCE COUNTY ORDINANCE 3930, RELATING TO THE INSPECTION AND GRADING OF FOOD ESTABLISHMENTS RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council hold the public hearing on this matter to consider adoption of the attached ordinance. BACKGROUND This ordinance will require food establishments to post the letter grade received from their inspection by the County. The County has adopted an ordinance that establishes a system of grading food establishments. The letter grades of this system range from "A" to "C". The grades are published on a placard that is clearly visible to the patrons of the establishment. The letter grade shows a measure of compliance with health regulations on the date of the inspection. The purpose of the ordinance is to protect public health through public notification of the health inspection results. With this system of posted grades, establishments are motivated to comply with health regulations and consumers are given information about the establishments they visit. Under this system, any food establishment that fails to attain a score of at least 80% (a "B" letter grade) shall receive written notice of the deficiencies. The food establishment will then have 30 days to correct the deficiencies and file a written request for a re-score inspection provided by the County. An establishment that fails to comply with the written notice, or that fails to attain a 80% on the re-score may be immediately closed by the County until they can achieve a score of at least 80%. In addition, any establishment that is determined to Page 2 February 2, 2005 CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT AN ORDINANCE THAT ADOPTS BY REFERENCE COUNTY ORDINANCE 3930, RELATING TO THE INSPECTION AND GRADING OF FOOD ESTABLISHMENTS pose an imminent health hazard will be subject to immediate closure regardless of the inspection score. As is currently the case, the County Division of Environmental Health Services (EHS) will do all inspections. The initial inspection will not cost the establishment but a re-score inspection will cost the establishment $52/hour. The fee is collected by the County to recover their costs for the re-inspection. This ordinance will not have any financial impact for the City. The County is already conducting inspections in the City. The adoption of this ordinance would make letter grade posting mandatory for all food establishments in the City. Respectfully submitted, [~ane A. Baker, Assistant to the City Manager ORDINANCE NO. 739 ko as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ADOPTING, BY REFERENCE, cOUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ORDINANCE NO. 3930 RELATING TO INSPECTION GRADING OF FOOD ESTABLISHMENTS AND AMENDING TITLE 8 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE. RECITALS. (i) On June 22, 2004, the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino adopted its Ordinance No. 3930 ("Ordinance No. 3930") relating to inspection grading of food establishments. (ii) By agreement, the County of San Bernardino enforces health-related codes of the State, as well as local health codes and ordinances. It is the intent of the City Council in adopting this ordinance to provide for the inspection and grading of food establishments within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. (iii) California Government Code §50022.9, et seq. authorizes the adoption by reference of county codes and provisions thereof, including Ordinance No. 3930. (iv) On February 2, 2005, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted and concluded a duly noticed public hearing as required by California Government Code § 50022.3. (v) A full, true and correct copy of Ordinance No. 3930 is on file and available for inspection in the office of the City Clerk or designee thereof. (vi) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. ORDINANCE. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby ordains SECTION: 1 SECTION: 2 '];he facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. A new Chapter 8.32 is hereby added to Title 8 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to read as follows: Ordinance No. 739 Page 2 of 13 "Chapter 8.32 "INSPECTION GRADING OF FOOD ESTABLISHMENTS "Sections 8.32.010 8.32.O2O 8.32.030 Regulations governing inspection grading of food establishments adopted. Fees. Penalties. "8.32.010 Regulations governing inspection grading of food establishments adopted, Notwithstanding any other provision of this Code, Ordinance No. 3930 of the County of San Bernardino adding Chapter 14 to Division 3 of Title 3 of the San Bernardino County Code, pertaining to inspection grading of food establishments, is hereby adopted by reference. "8.32.020 Fees. Notwithstanding any provision contained in the San Bernardino County Code, fees required by any provision of Ordinance No. 3930, including Section 2 thereof, or any successor ordinance or provision thereto, shall be as established by the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino, unless the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has adopted a fee for the same service or activity, in which case each such City-adopted fee shall be the applicable fee. "8.32.030 Penalty. A violation of any of the provisions of Ordinance No. 3930 adopted by reference in this chapter shall be a misdemeanor, add shall be punishable as provided in Chapter 1.12 of Title I of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code." .SECTION 3. SEVERABILITY. The City Council declares~that §hould any provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of t~hi~ Ordinance or Ordinance No. 3930 of the County of San ,B.er.r~,~d, ino, adopted by reference hereby, be rendered or de.cl~.~e..~vali(~ by any final court action in a coud of competent juriCtion, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences and words of this Ordinance and Ordinance No. 3930 shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 4. SECTION 5. The provisions of this Ordinance shall become operative on March 7, 2005. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. Please see the following page for formal adoption, cerlificafion and signatures Ordinance No. 739 Page 4 of 13 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ORDINANCE NO. 3930 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 14 TO DIVISION 3 OF TITLE 3 AND ADDING SUBSECTION 16.0213B(b)(17) TO CHAPTER 2 OF DIVISION 6 OF 'fl'fLE 1, ALL OF THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CODE, RELA'I*ING TO INSPECTION GRADING OF FOOD ESTABLISHMENTS. The Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino, State of California, ordains as follows: SECTION 1. Chapter 14 is added to Division 3 of Title 3 of the San Bernardino 14 INSPECTION GRADING OF FOOD ESTABLISHMENTS 15 Sections: 16 .33.1401 17 33.1402 33.1403 18 33.1404 33.1405 19 33,1406 20 33.1407 21 Authority. Fopd program Official Inspection'Report. Grading. Notice of Closure. Routine Inspection. Posting Requirements - Penalty for Non-Compliance ~ Do::ument.' Available for Public Review. Leffer Grade Card - Period of Validity. f¢242326 SMR 6/25/2004 22 3321401 Authority. 23 Pui'suant to the authority cited in Chapter I (Authority and Administration) and 24 Chapter 4 (FOod Pr(Stection) of Division 3 of Title 3 of the San Bemardino County 25 Code (hereinafter referred to as the "Code"), as well as Health and Safety Code 26 section 113715, food establishments shall be subject to a grading system as provided 27 in this Chapter. All provisiops of Chapters 1, 2, and3 of this Division shall apply to 28.' th s Chapter except as otherwise provided herein. Ordinance No. 739 Page 5 of 13 1 2 3. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 23 24 25 26 27' 28 #242326 SMR 6/14/2004 33.1402 Food Program Official Inspection Report. Food Program Official Inspection Report' ('OIR") means the written report prepared and copy issued to a food establishment by the UDirector" of the Division of Environmental Health Services, Department of Public Health, as defined in subsection 33.0115(c), or his designee, ("'health official") after conducting a Routine Inspection of a food .establishment to determine compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations relatir~g to the protection of public health. For purposes of this Chapter only, "food establishment* [as' defined in subsection 33.042(c)] shall mean only a retail food establishment at a permanent location. 33.1403 Grading. (a) "Grade* means the letter grade issued by the health official at the conclusion of the ·Routine Inspection of a fo® establishment. The grade·shall be based upon the scoring method set forth in this section resulting from the OIR and shall reflect the food establishment"s degree of compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations relating to the protection of public health. (b) 'Letter Grade Card" means a Card that shall be posted bY the health ,~f~i~i~l at a food establishment uoon completion of a Routine Inspechon that ind~cates th e letter grade of the food establishment as determined by the health official using the scodng method set forth in this section and includes an Inspeotion Summary shown by Figures I through 3. An Inspection/Summa~ Report is a Report, as summary of the OIR as defined in section 33.'1402. III Ordinance No. 739 Page 6 of 13 15 16 17. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 '~42326 SMR 4/2004 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 13 14 /11 III III III III III I/I :iff /// .A FIGURE 1 Ordinance No. 739 Page 7 of 13 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O 21 23 24 25 26 27 28 #242326 SMR 6/14/2004 FIGURE 2 Ordinance No. 739 Page 8 of 13 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 #242326 SMR 6/14,'2004 C F IGUP~ 3 I (c) Any food establishment that faiis to attain at least a uB" grade, as defined herein, shall be issued written notice, through an OIR, by the health official· lithe foOd establishment must correct the deficiencies listed in the OIR and must file a written request for a. re-score inspection with the health official with. in 30 days of the OIR. A re-score inspection shall be conducted by the health official and be subject to a re-score inspection fee as provided in the Code, Schedule of Fees. The health official wilD comple?e the re-score inspection within ten (10) County business days of :ood establshment~s filing of a written request for a re-score inspection. A food .=stablishment faii'~ng to comply with the OIR, or failing to attain at least a UB" grade on Ordinance No. 739 Page 9 of 13 1 2 3' 4' 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 23 24 25 26 27 28 #242326 SMR 5/14/2004 the re-score inspection, may be immediately closed by the health official and remain :losed until at least a B grade is achieved on a re-score inspection. Nothing in this ~mvisi0n sl~all prohibit the health official from immediately closing an,/ food ~stablishment if, at his discretion, immediate closure is necessary to protect the public health. (d) The letter grade shall be based upon the final numerical percentage score set forth in the OIR as follows: (1) A grade of "A' Shall indicate a final score ~)f ninety percent (90%) or higher, as determined by the health official; . . (2). A grade of "B" shall indicated a final score of eighty-nine percent 89%) but not less than eighty percent (80%), as determined by the health official; (3) A grade of "C" shall indicate a final score of seventy-nine percent 79%) but not less than seventy percent (70%), as determined by.;the health official. 13.1404 Notice of Closure. "Notice of Closure' means a public notice that shall be 'posted by the health official at a food establishment upOn suspension or revocation of the food establishment's public health permit and that results in the:closure .of the food 'establishment and the discontinuance 'of all operations of the food establishment, by order of the health official, because of violations of applicable federal, state, and local' laws and regulations relating to the protection of public health. The Notice of Closure shall remain posted until removed by the health official. Removal.. of the Notice of Closure by any person other than the health official or the refusal of a food establishment to close upon issuance of the written notice of.suspension of the public health permit is a violation of this Chapter and may result in the revocation of the food establishment's public health permit and shall be punishabl,e as specified in section t 33.0112 of this Code. ,> -~ Ordinance No. 739 Page 10 of 13 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 14 tg f? t~ :,'U 24 26 28 F~I 4/~004 ~3.1405 Routine Inspection. "Routine Inspection" means an unannounced inspection of any food ;stablishment to determine compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations relating to the protection of public health. A Routine Inspection shall not mean an inspection conducted by the health official to determine compliance with a previously issued OIR or any interim inspection conducted to determine compliance with specific regulations or legal requirements. ;3.1406 Posting Requirements - Penalt~ for Non-Compliance - Documents ~,vallable for Public Review. (a} Upon completion of the Routine Inspection, the health official shall post at every food establishment the Letter Grade Card, so as to be clearly visibie to the general public and to patrons entering the food establishment. "Clearly ¥isible to the general pubiic and to patrons" ~hall mean: (1) Posted in the front window of the food establishment within five 5) feet of the front door;,. (2) Posted in a display case mounted on the outside .front wall of the ood establishment within five (~) feet of the front doo~ or (3) Posted in a location approved by the health .official to ensure p~'oper notice to the general public and to patrons. (b) In the event that a foodestablishment is operated in the same building or space as a separately licen.sed or permitted business, or in the event that a food establishment shares a common patron entrance with a separately licensed or permitted business, or in the event of both, the health official shall post the Letter Grade Card, in the initial patron contact area, or in a location approved by the health official. ;. (c) The Letter R?a~de. Card shall not be defaced, marred, camouflaged, ~idden or removed. It sh.~tl be unlawful to operate a food establishment unless the 15.5 -, Ordinance No. 739 Page 11 of 13 1 2 3 4' 5 6 7 8 9 10 1:1 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 i9 2O 21 23 24 25 26 27 #242326 SMR 6/14/2004 _attar Grade Card is posted. Removal of the Letter Grade Card is a violation of this Chapter and may result in the suspension or revocation of the public health permit and shall be punishable as specified in section 33.0112 of this Code. (d) The OIR upon which the Letter Grade Card is based shall be maintained at the food establishment and shall be available to the general public and to patrons for review upon request. The food establishment shall keep the OIR until such time as the health official completes the next Routine Inspection of the food establishment and issues a new CIR. 33.1407 Letter Grade Card - Period of Validity. ' A Letter Grade Card shall remain valid until the health official con, plates, the next Routine Inspection of the food establishment. A re-score inspection is a complete Routine Inspection that may be rpquired of (as provided in S. Ubsection 33.1'403(c)), or requested by, the food establishment. . - (a) A re-score inspection shall be conducted by the health official following the filing of a re-score inspection request form. In accordance with ;the Code~ Schedule of Fees, the re-score inspection fee must be paid by the food establishment upon demand by the health official. (b) At the conclusion of the re-score inspection of the food establishment the Letter Grade Card shall be issued based upon the Scodng method set forth in this Chapter resulting from the CIR.. (c) · A requested re-score inspection is separate and independent of all re- inspections of critical violations as determined by the health official. 1 .2 3 4 10 11 '14 22 24 2~ 27 28 ~t242326 SMR Ordinance No. 739 Page 12 of 13 SECTION 2. Subsection 16.0213B(b)(17) is added to Chapter 2 of Division S of 7itle I of the San Bernardino County Code, to read: 6.O213B Health Services - Environmental. (b) Food/Recreational Health Program Fee: (17) Re-score Inspection .................... $52.00/hr. SECTION 3. This ordinance shal/'becorpe effective thirty (30) days from the dat~ of adoption and i's provisions shall-- '/~b~~bar1, 2004. DENNIS HAN-SBERGE~, Chairman Board of Supervisors SIGNED AND CERTIFIED THAT A coPY OF THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN DELIVERED TO THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD J' ~REN~7.E .~TIA,~rj~.f t he B°ard °f Supervis°rs S'FATE OF CALIFORNIA ;OUN'I'Y OF SAN BERNARDINO I, J. RENEE BASTIAN, Clerk of the Board of SupervisoR of the County of San lernardino, State of California, hereby certify that at a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of said County and State, held on the 22nd day of 3une , 2004, at which meeting were present Supervisors: · posl~mus~ Biane~ Agutar~ Young, Ransbereer.' and the Clerk, the foregoing ordinanc~ w..as passed and adopted by the following vote, Ordinance No. 739 Page 13 of 13 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 .20 21 23 24 25 26 27 28 #242326 SMR 8/14/2004 AYES: SUPERVISORS: t~,tane, ABuiar, Young, Hausberser NOES: SUPERVISORS: ABSENT: SUPERVISORS: ~,loae IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the Board of Supervisors this 22=d daY_~Of June _, 2004. j. R~rk of the Board of Su¢~r~4~~F~c~of San Bemardino, Approved as to Form qonald D, Reitz, County Counsel Depu~ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 #242626 SMR 6/25/2004 &N ORDINANCE NO. 3930 ORDINANCE OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 14 TO DIVISION 3 OF TITLE 3 AND ADDING SUBSECTION 16.0213B(b)(17) TO CHAPTER 2 OF DIVISION 6 OF TITLE 1, ALL OF THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CODE, RELATING TO INSPECTION GRADING OF FOOD ESTABLISHMENTS. The Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino, State of.California, rdains as follows: SECTION 1. Chapter 14 is added to Division 3 of Title 3 of the San Bernardino County Code, to read: Sections: .33.1401 33.1402 33.1403 33.1404 33.1405 33.!406 33.1407 CHAPTER14 INSPECTION GRADING OF FOOD ESTABLISHMENTS Authority. Fo.od program Official Inspection'Report. Grading. Notice of Closure. Routine Inspection. Posting Requirements - Penalty for Non-Compliance - Documents Available for Public Review. Letter Grade Card - Period of Validity. 33.1401 Authority. Pursuant to the authority cited in Chapter I (Authority and Administration) and Chapter 4 (Food Protection) of Division 3 of Title 3 of the San Bernardino County Code (hereinafter referred to as the "Code"),. as well as Health and Safety Code .ection 113715, food establishments shall be subject to a grading system as provided 3 this Chapter. All provisions of Chapters 1, 2, and 3 of this Division shall apply to this Chapter except as otherwise provided herein. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 #242326 SMR 6/14/2004 33.1402 Food Program Official Inspection Report. Food Program Official .Inspection Report ("ORR") means the written report prepared and copy issued to a food establishment by the "Director" of the Division of Environmental Health Services,,,, Department, 0f. Public Health, as defined in subsection 33.0115(c), or his designee, ( health official ) after conducting a Routine Inspection of a food establishment to determine compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations relating to the protection of public health. For purposes of this Chapter only, "food establishment" [as' defined in subsection 33.042(c)] shall mean only a retail food establishment at a permanent location. 33.1403 Grading. (a) "Grade" means the letter grad..e issued by the health official at the conclusion of the ·Routine Inspection of a fo~d establishment. The grade shall be based upon the scoring method set forth in this section resulting from the OIR and shall reflect the food establishment's degree 0f compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations relating to the protection of public health. (b) "Letter Grade Card" means a card that shall be posted by the health official at a food establishment uponuu[,,jJ~uu,~--= ..... of a ....'--,,,~uecdon the letter grade of the food establishment as determined by the health official using the scoring method set forth in this section and includes an Inspection Summary Report, as shown by Figures I through 3. An Inspection Summary Report is a summary of the OIR as defined in section 33.1402. 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 , '~42326 SMR ~" 14/2004 Inspeetlon' $a-~tna~ ,P.~p6~t ~ FIGURE 1 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 !9 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 #242326 SMR 6/14/2004 Ins~e. ctlon Summar~ FIGURE 2 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 1.9 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 #242326 SMR 6/14/2004 ins!~eCt~on ~ummary Re_p..oFt FIGURE 3 (c) Any food establishment that fails to attain at least a "B" grade, as defined herein, shall be issued written notice, through an OIR, by the health official. The food establishment must correct the deficiencies listed in the OIR and must file a written request for a. re-score inspection with the health official within 30 days of the OIR. A re-score inspection shall be conducted by the health official and be subject to a re-score inspection fee as provided in the Code, Schedule of Fees. The health official wil! comple, te the re-score inspection within ten (10) County business days of establishme~t~ filing of a written request for a re-score inspection. A food ,stab[ishment failing to co'mply with the OIR, or failing to attain at least a "B" grade on 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 !9 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 #242326 SMR 6/14/2004 the re-score inspection, may be immediately closed by the health official and remain closed until at least a "B" grade is achieved on a re-score inspection. Nothing in this provision shall prohibit the health official from immediately closing any food establishment if, at his discretion, immediate closure is necessary to protect the public health. (d) The letter grade shall be based upon the final numerical percentage score set forth in the OIR as follows: (1) A grade of "A" shall indicate a final score ~f ninety percent (90%) or higher, as determined by the health official; (2) A grade of "B" shall indicated a final score of eighty-nine percent (89%) but not less than eighty percent (80%), as determined by the health official; (3) A grade of "C" shall indicate a final score of seventy-nine percent (79%) but not less than seventy percent (70%), as determined by..the health official. 33.1404 Notice of Closure. "Notice of Closure" means a public notice that shall be posted by the health official at a food establishment upon suspension or revocation of the food establishment's public health permit and that results in the:closure of the food establishment and the discontinuance of all operations of the food establishment, by order of the health official, because of violations of applicable federal, state, and local· laws and regulations relating to the protection of public health. The Notice of Closure shall remain posted until removed by the health official. Rempval of the Notice of Closure by any person other than the health official or ttie refusal of a food establishment to close upon issuance of the written notice of.suspension of the public health permit is a violation of this Chapter and may result in the revocation of the food establishment's public health permit and shall be punishable,, as specified in section 33.0112 of this Code. 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 #242326 SMR 6/14/2004 3.1405 Routine Inspection. "Routine Inspection" means an unannounced inspection of any food establishment to determine compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations relating to the protection of public health. A Routine Inspection shall not mean an inspection conducted by the health official to determine compliance with a previously issued OIR or any interim inspection conducted to determine compliance with specific regulations or legal requirements. 33.1406 Posting Requirements - Penalty.for Non-Compliance - Documents ~.vailable for Public Review. (a) Upon completion of the Routine Inspection, the health official shall post zt every food establishment tl~e Letter Grade Card, so as to be clearly visibie to the general public and to patrons entering the food establishment. "Clearly yisible to the general public and to patrons" ~ball mean: ' (1) Posted in the front window of the food establishment within five (5) feet of the front door; (2) Posted in a, display case mounted on the outside.front wall of the food establishment within five (~) feet of the front door; or (3) Posted ina location approved by the health official to ensure proper notice to the general public and to patrons. (b) In the event that a foodestablishment is operated in the same building or space as a separately licen,sed or permitted business, or in the event that a food establishment shares a common patron entrance with a separately licensed or ~errnitted business, or in the' event of both, the health official shall post the Letter Grade Card, in the initial patron contact area, or in a location approved by the health official. .. (c) The Letter G~'a~e. Card shall not be defaced, marred, camouflaged, hidden or removed. It shall be unlawful to operate a food establishment unless the 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 20 21 22 23- 24 25 26 27 28 #242326 SMR 6/14/2004 Letter Grade Card is posted. Removal of the Letter Grade Card is a violation of this Chapter and may result in the suspension or revocation of the public health permit and shall be punishable as specified in section 33.0112 of this Code. (d) The OIR upon which the Letter Grade Card is based shall be maintained at the food establishment and shall be available to the general public and to patrons for review upon request. The food establishment shall keep the OIR until such time as the health official completes the next Routine Inspection of the food establishment and issues a new OIR. 33.1407 Letter Grade Card - Period of Validity. ' A Letter Grade Card shall remain valid until the health official completes the next Routine Inspection of the food establishment. A re-score inspection is a complete Routine Inspection that may be required of (as provided in S.~bsection 33.1'403(c)), or requested by, the food establishment. (a) A re-score inspection shall be conducted by the health official following the filing of a re-score inspection request form. In .accordance ~;ith the Code, Schedule of Fees, the re-score inspection fee must be paid by the food establishment upon demand by the health official. : (b) At the conclusion of the re-score inspection of the food establishment the Letter Grade Card shall be issued based upon the scoring method set forth in this Chapter resulting fro[n the OIR. (c) A requested re-score inspection is separate and independent of all re- inspections of critical violations as determined by the health official. /// /// /// !/// 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 #242326 SMR 6/14/2004 SECTION 2. Subsection 16.0213B(b)(17) is added to Chapter 2 of Division 6 of 'itle I of the San Bernardino County Code, to read: 6.0213B Health Services - Environmental. (b) Food/Recreational 14ealth Program Fee: (17) Re-score Inspection .................... $52.00/hr. SECTION 3. This ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days from the late of adoption and lis provisions shall beco e operativ n October 1, 2004. DENNIS HAN-SBERGE~, Chairman Board of Supervisors SIGNED AND CERTIFIED THAT A COPY OF THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN DELIVERED TO THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) )SS. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) I, J. RENEE BASTIAN, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino, State of California, hereby certify that at a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of said County and State, held on the 22nd day of 3une , 2004, at which meeting were present Supervisors: Postmus, Biane, AKu~ar, Young, Hansber~er,' and the Clerk, the foregoing ordinance w, as passed and adopted by the following vote, to wit: ,> ~ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 '9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 .20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 #242326 SMR 6/14/2004 AYES: SUPERVISORS: Biane, Aguiar, Young, Hansberger NOES: SUPERVISORS: ?ostmus ABSENT: SUPERVISORS: None IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my seal of the Board of Supervisors this 22nd day of June Approved as to Form Ronald D. Reitz, County Counsel Deputy Date: ~ qand and affixed the official 2004. 10 January 20, 2005 The Honorable William J. Alexander May, or, City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive RanCho Cucamonga, CA 91730 City of Rancho Cucamonga Proposed Ordinance No. 739 - An Ordinance That Adopts By Reference County Ordinance No. 3930 Relating To The Inspection of Food Establishments Dear Mayor Alexander: Th~ California Restaurant Association (CRA) is the largest and longest serving non-profit re&aurant trade association in the nation. CRA represents Over 25,000 foodservice est'ablishments in California, including restaurants in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. CRA is op'posed to letter grading systems. We urge the City Council to VOTE NO on the implementation of a citywide restaurant and food preparation rating system after the public hearing on February 2, 2005. We oppose letter grading systems for the following reasons: Letter grades do not offer the public an accurate view of health and safety conditions. In addition, it is just another layer of regulation and fees placed on business that does little to promote food safety. Many local jurisdictions are implementing more effective programs and rejecting letter __^~t; ..... nil,, ~h,- C~t,t ,,f qan *rr~ne;ce,, has rejected ~ l~tter m-adln~ ~wtem recognizing that it is not the solution for promoting food safety. The posted grade, which remains posted over a period of time, may give a false sense of security or condemnation in the eyes of a public that does not know the implication for the grade. For example, a customer would not know ifa restaurant received a "B" grade for aesthetic or risk-based reasons. Was there a crack in' the tile in a linen closet or a sanitation problem in the kitchen? Posted "ABC" grades, based on a periodic inspection report, are shortsighted because they are based only on a snapshot in time. No matter how much effort is made to remove subjectivity from the process, there is still a subjective determination based on the circumstances observed by one inspector at one point in time. Letter grading does little to promote food safety. Instead, it causes the emphasis i~ many restaurant operations to become "how to get an 'A' grade" rather than on "how can we do a better job at assuring the safety and health of our guests." We share your commitment to food safety, however, we support letter grading alternatives that we believe are more effective in informing the public about the health status of restaurants. We welcome the opporlunity to work with you in exploring such alternatives. In the interim, .we urge you to VOTE NO on Proposed Ordinance No. 739. l~fitrick J. Shipley, Esq. Director of Local Government Affairs California Restaurant Association CC: Jack Lam, City Manager ,~ CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MARCH 2, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HEL~_~N THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY 9 ,~e~,~cno HALL, ~J~-00 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE {.~UCAMONGA RESOLUTION NO. 05-092 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE HIGHLAND AVENUE LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS EAST OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD, CONTRACT NO. 04~160 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK , CoNs N [ The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non- controversial. The Council will act upon them at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion. No Items Submitted. F~ ADVERTIsED PUBLicHEA~CS ' The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. 1. CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT AN ORDINANCE THAT ADOPTS BY REFERENCE COUNTY ORDINANCE 3930 RELATING TO THF INSPECTION GRADING OF FOOD ESTABLISHMENT,e; (CONTINUED FROM FEBRUARY 2, 2005) ORDINANCE NO. 739 (second reading) No action taken. No AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF motion made. THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING, BY REFERENCE, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ORDINANCE NO. 3930 RELATING TO INSPECTION GRADING OF FOOD ESTABLISHMENTS AND AMENDING TITLE 8 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE Inspection Summary Report For: Address: NO CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIRED CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIRED IN THE FOLLOWING AREAS: Food Handling Food Temperature Food Storage Food Source & Labeling Water Supply & Temperature Utensil Washing & Sanitizing Employee Practices Equipment Sanitation Equipment Maintenance Facility Sanitation Facility Maintenance Restrooms Pest Control Waste Management Comments: A COMPLETE INSPECTION REPORT CAN BE VIEWED AT THIS FACILITY, UPON REQUEST AND IS AVAILABLE AT THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT TAMPERING OR REMOVAL OF THIS REPORT IS A VIOLATION OF S.B.C.C.§ 33.1406(c) ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SPECIALIST DATE 5~0087 ISR carc A JNDD 9104 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES OFFICES County of S~ ] Bqmardino -- Hum_--,n Serdces System, DEFARTfCENT OF FUBLIC mEALYH FOOD PROGR.aJ¥'I OFFIOiAL, IN~P~ 'F:"-'_,... ~ ION- ~4EPORT ~s ased c,~ aa h'~SpaC(~On !his aay, the iiems marked bdow !denlify ih8 '4oialJon(s) in operation or raciiii~es which must be corrected The Ferm~ttee has the right 't¢'E~,~ ~¥!thlP ~Scaendardaysohecdp!of(h~s notice,~oshowcausewhytneoermil(oopefateshouldnoibesu=pCndedorrevo~¢d ( ) ; 8:fur9 [o ,36 6c~ Jis;8o VlO~a(Jo3(s) piior ~o the desJgnaed compliance data may n ecess;iaie an addi',aoF al [dnspectbn a~ s charqe of S52 0O/hou~ · ,, ~ eL ~ ~_~, 0 ~ /all critica¢ violations pose an mm nan r sk to public health and have a direct corrdation to foodbome illness(es). lhess Items ~tg)ST gE CORRECT~D IMMEDIATELY. APPL LAW C~ Health a Safety Code/San ~ernardino Co Code (SBCC) ~, ~ u~(Of.,ROL~ Major Minor ~ 1 ~ ~ ¢~oper Re~,eatin~ o~RF- 113998 ...... ~ 5 ~ope~ ~nawin¢ ............... Zrrozen rood Hand]~nc 114085 _ ...... 3 ~ ¢ '~ ~ood Pro',ectec From Conmrnination, Adulleration, Spoiiage' j .. mens La Equ P%~' 1'~0~,.}14090 · I P,ops, Storage ~14003 ~140!0. 114070114080 5 3~ 15 Proper 5aniiizin9 of Food Coniact Sufiaces- ¢;EF, T!FiCAiIOi~ I PROTECTION / EQU!PM, ENT / UTENSILS Ma}or Minor 11,37!6 113~20. (SSCC 33 04~0. 33044) 3 2 Em¢~oyqe PersonaJ Items EmpJoyee ~h~ng~ R~om FOOD HANDLER / FACILITY CONDITION ' ! 9 Proper Empioyee Hygiene 114920, M4022 10 HandwashingSin?JSupphes-114115 114190 - 1i Unsani~a?¢ Food FacBly Conditions - '11~0 ...... 4 .... ~-I WATER I SANITIZING ,4ajor Min~r Jrt- ST~RUCT~RAL J R_EST~OOHLL_JANITO~RiA~/SIGN-~ ___ t~ajo, _.Mbo/._ 25 Exhaud System Clean and fi, Good Repair- 114050, 114140 - 2 - 'i' - Restau}ant Search Results Food Housing and Plan Protection Property Check Public Improvement Public Business Public Business Business Recreational Health Public Business Waste Water/Wastewater Vector Management Land Use Control Public Public Public Business Business Business Restaurant Ratings Inspected retail food establishments receive a score or a letter grade according to their inspection report. Restaurant Rating Search Help For a detailed listing for a facility, click on a facility name. To change the sort criteria for a page, click the column header of the column you would like to sort by. For a detailed explanation of the Food Facility Rating system, go to the Retail Food Inspection Guide. All data is updated daily. City: Rancho Cucamonga AIl 0-__9 _A _B C_ _D _E F G _H I~ J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X y Z Facility Name 42nd St Bagel Cafe 7-eleven 33308 76 Gas Station/red Hill Oil 99 Cent Only Stores 99 Cents Plus Superstore A & J Liquor A + Donuts A-1 Shell Accents Distinctive Event Results i-25 of 3i0 Address 11096 Foothill Blvd Unit 100 10477 Alta Loma Dr 8166 Foothill BIvd 9640 Baseline Rd 8023 Archibald Av 8939 Foothill Blvd 8880 Archibald Ave Unit C 9524 Foothill Blvd 9500 Cleveland Ave Unit 190 Zip Code 91730 91737 91730 91730 91730 9173O 91730 91730 91730 htrp://sbcounrygov/dehs/restgrades/resuhs.asp?city=RANCHO CUCAMONGA ( I of 2)3~2/2005 6:40:15 AM Inspection Date 01/24/2005 01/25/2005 01/11/2005 02/14/2005 11/16/2004 02/04/2005 11/04/2004 11/18/2004 10/28/2004 , Next > Score Equivalent Grade 92 A 95 A 94 A 93 A 95 A 95 A 92 A 97 A 9O A RestatI'rant Search Results Food Housing and . Plan Recreational Waste Water/VVastewater Vector Protection Property Check Health Management Land Use Control Public Improvement Public Public Public Public Public Business Public Business Business Business Business Business Business Department of Public Health Division of Environmental Health Restaurant Ratings Inspected retail food establishments receive a score or a letter grade according to their inspection report. Restaurant Rating Search Help For a detailed listing for a facility, click on a facility name. To change the sort criteria for a page, click the column header of the column you would like to sort by. For a detailed explanation of the Food Facility Rating system, go to the Retail Food Inspection Guide, All data is updated daily. City: Rancho Cucamonga AIl 0-9 A_ B C D _E _F _G H ~1J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z < Previous Facility Name Baskin-robbins #3081 Bc Donuts & Espresso Biff Lots #103 Bill Lots #322 Blimpie Subs & Salads Blimpie Subs & Salads Blockbuster Video #06083 Blockbuster Video #06470 Blockbuster Video #06831 Results 26-50 of 3i0 Address 9691 Baseline Rd 9767 19th St 12322 4th St 9008 Foothill BIvd 11096 Foothill Blvd Unit C 9760 19th St 9309 Foothill BIvd 7201 Haven Ave Unit D 8710 19th St Unit 110 Zip Code 91786 91737 91730 9173O 91730 91737 91730 91730 91701 Next > Inspection Score Equivalent Date Grade 11/29/2004 100 A 01/25/2005 94 A 11/24/2004 93 A 01/21/2005 96 A 12/01/2004 81 A 12/06/2004 93 A 02/18/2005 98 A 01/27/2005 100 A 11/10/2004 98 A ~:~' htlp://sbcounty.gov/dehs/restgrades/results,asp city=...MONGA&sort_col=FacilityName&erdeFASC&alpha=&pageno=2 (I of 2)3/2/2005 6:43:43 AM · Rcstaffirant Search Results Food Housing and Plan Protection Property Check Public Improvement Public Business Public Business Business Recreational Health Public Business Waste WaterNVastewater Vector Management Land Use Control Public Public Public Business Business Business Restaurant Ratings Inspected retail food establishments receive a score or a letter grade according to their inspection report. Restaurant Rating Search Help For a detailed listing for a facility, click on a facility name. To change the sort criteria for a page, click the column header of the column you would like to sort by. For a detailed explanation of the Food Facility Rating system, go to the Retail Food Inspection Guide. All data is updated daily. City: Rancho Cucamonga All 0-9 _A _B _C _D _E _F _G H _t J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Previous Facility Name Cheronys Deli Chevron #1962 Chevron Stations Inc 1888 Chevron Stations Inc 1897 Chile Red Chili's #197 China Duck China Point Chinatown House Results 51-75 of 3i0 Address Zip Code 7270 Victoria Park Ln Unit 2g 91739 8801 Foothill BI 917303335 12659 Foothill Blvd 91739 8687 Baseline Rd 91730 9608 Baseline 91701 10598 Foothill Blvd 91730 8421 Haven Ave 91730 9028 Archibald Ave 91730 9030 Foothill Blvd Unit 102 91730 Next > Inspection Score Equivalent Date G fade 12/20/2004 92 A 01/06/2005 99 A 02/03/2005 94 A 01/18/2005 98 A 02/10/2005 79 C 12/08/2004 90 A 01/19/2005 95 A 12/21/2004 92 A 12/09/2004 85 El h ttp://sbc~unty~g~v/dehs/restgrades/resu~ts~asp?city=~M~NGA&s~rt-c~=FacilityName&~rder-ASC&a~pha=&pagen~=3 (1 ot'2)3/2/2005 6:38:13 AM County of San Bernaidino .P Department of Public H~alth .~ Division of Environmental H~alth September 2004 Table of Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................. 1 2. Common Terminology .................................................................................. 2 3, Centers for Disease Control Risk Factors .................................................... 3 4. Understanding the Inspection Process ........................................................ 4 5. Understanding The Official Inspection Report ..............................' ............... 5 6. Official Inspection Report ............................................................................. 6 7. Understanding Your Grade .......................................................................... 8 8. Understanding The Inspection Summary Report (ISR or Grade Card) ...... 10 9. How Violations Are Identified ..................................................................... 12 10. Self Inspection Checklist ............................................................................ 28 11. Contact Information ................................................................................ i_.31 12. Agency Referral List ................................................................................... 32 13. Booklet Request Form ............................................................................... 33 Introduction The Retail Food Inspection Guide provides information to the food service operator on matters related to the Official Inspection Report, the scoring and grading system, the retail food inspection process, and common terminology used by the Food Inspection Program. This guide serves not only as a reference booklet but also as an educational tool to assist the food service operator in self-assessment. The Official inspection Report (OIR) is used both to document the violations observed in the establishment and to calculate the final score/grade based on those violations. To facilitate understanding of how grades will be posted, a sample of the Grade Card (Inspection Summary Report) along with explanations of how it is to be marked and posted have been included. To assist the operator in understanding the inspection report, this guide provides detailed information on each category along with some examples of the most common violations that would meet these criteria. In addition, pertinent sections of the California Uniform Retail Food Facilities Law and San Bernardino County Code are provided as well as procedures to assist in compliance with the law. In order to maintain and operate a food establishment in compliance with the law and to prepare for the inspection process, a self-inspection guide has been included. This guide assists the operator or manager to complete an inspection using the same criteria as Environmental Health Services. The final section of this guide provides contact information regarding the San Bernardino County Environmental Health Services Division as well as local, state, and federal government agencies and programs. it is important to remember when using this document that it is a reference tool. As with all refbrence material, information changes. The scientific community constantly provides enforcement agencies with new and updated information; laws and policies are subject to change based upon the public health need; and risk assessment must constantly be reviewed to ensure program effectiveness. Therefore, this document is subject to change to keep pace with current developments. DEHS will make all efforts to ensure the food service industry is aware of significant changes in a timely manner. If there are questions regarding the inspection report, actions by the health inspector or the Division, or any applicable law or regulation, please contact Environmental Health Services. The health inspector, supervisor and local office are available to provide assistance upon request. Common Terminology The following terms are intended to assist the operator in using this Retail Food Inspection Guide. Approved Source is a producer, manufacturer, distributor, or other food facility that is properly licensed or permitted by a local, state or federal agency. California Uniform Retail Food Facilities Law (CURFFL) is part of the California Health and Safety Code addressing the regulation of food establishments. Cross Contamination is the transfer of harmful microorganisms from one food to another. Microorganisms may be transferred from contaminated equipment, utensils, and human hands to other food. Microorganisms may also be transferred when raw meat or poultry are stored or thawed above other food. (During storing or thawing, raw meab'poultry juices may drip on food below.) Diligent Preparation is a process in which a food handler is actively engaged in the preparation of a food item. HACCP Plan is a written document that details the formal procedures for following the Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP) principles that were developed by the National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria for Foods. Inspection Summary Report (ISR) is the letter grade placard that will be placed in the window or another approved location by the health inspector after a routine or re-score inspection. Notice of Closure is a placard that will be posted by the health inspector at a food establishment when the establishment's health permit is suspended or revoked. Once a Notice of Closure has been issued the food establishment is required to discontinue all operations. The Notice of Closure will be posted in the front window or in a location approved by the health inspector. Removal of the Notice of Closure by anyone other than the health inspector or the refusal of a food establishment to close when issued a '~Notice of Closure" is a violation of San Bernardino County Code (S.B.C.C.) Section 33.1404. Potentially Hazardous Food (PHF) is food that is capable of supporting the rapid and progressive growth of microorganisms that may cause foodborne illness. Examples include: protein food (meat, poultry, seafood, eggs), dairy products (cheese, milk), and cooked vegetabies. Revocation is an action taken by the Environmental Health Services Division to order an establishment permanently closed. Sherman Food Drug and Cosmetic Act is part of the California Health and Safety Code addressing labeling, advertising and pure food. Suspension is an action taken by the Environmental Health Services Division to order an establishment temporarily closed. Voluntary Condemnation and Destruction (VC&D) is the action taken to allow the operator to voluntarily dispose spoiled, adulterated or unsafe food. Centers for Disease Contro Risk Factors Accordin9 to Centers for Disease Control (CDC), the following factors contribute to illness, The numbers add up to more than 100% because more than one of the contributi _:; factors are usually implicated in foodborne illness outbreaks, 63% Inadequate Cooling and Cold Holding Temperatures 29% Preparing Food Ahead of Planned Service 27% Inadequate Hot Holding Temperatures 26% Poor Personal Hygiene/Infected Persons 25% Inadequate Reheating 9% Inadequate Cleaning of Equipment 7% Use of Leftovers 6% Cross Contamination 5% Inadequate Cookin9 or Heat Processing 4% Containers Adding Toxic Chemicals 2% Contaminated Raw Ingredients 2% Intentional Chemical Additives 1% Incidental Chemical Additives " 1% Unsafe Sources The health inspector primarily focuses on the above critical risk factors when conductin~ routine inspections of food establishments in an effort to reduce risk of foodborne illness. Understanding the Inspection Process Routine Inspections are conducted twice annually and are unannounced. The inspector conducts an in-depth evaluation of the establishment operation and records deficiencies on the OIR by marking the major or minor box for each respective violation. The violation points are summed and subtracted from 100. A corresponding letter grade is issued to the establishment at the conclusion of the inspection. Reinspections are follow-up inspections initiated by the inspector when the routine inspection reveals serious 0r repeat violations at the establishment. Re-reinspections are inspections conducted by the health inspector to address serious or repeat violations not corrected at the first reinspection. These inspections incur an additional charge to the food establishment. Complaints/Reports of Foodborne Illness are investigated by the inspector as they are received. These investigations are generally not scored and may .require follow-up inspections if violations are found. Closures are actions taken against the establishment most often due to Iow scores (below 70); failure to maintain at least a "B" rating at a re-score inspection; and any other hazard creating an immediate danger to public health. An establishment that is ordered to close will have a closure sign posted by the health inspector. Re-score Inspection is a routine inspection requested by the owner of an establishment in order to have the establishment re-scored. Establishments receiving less than a "B" rating the establishment. Requesting a re-score inspection is not a guarantee of receiving a higher score or grade. Ur decst d_i 9 the Officia inspecbo " Report Environmental Health Services is responsible for enforcing the San Bernardino County Code (SBCC) ano sections of the California Health and Safety Code (H&S). To ensure that each food establishment is in compliance with these regulations, the Environmental Health Specialist, who is more commonly referred to as the health inspector, conducts inspections. Any violation of the re~outations is documented on the Official Inspection Report (OIR), which is issued by the health inspector at the conclusion of the inspection. This report is used for routine inspections, complaint/foodborne illness investigations and other Division inspections to indicate the food establishment's status as well as the deficiencies found at the time of the inspection. The intent of the O!R is to recognize the varying degrees of risk to public health associated with violations of applicable laws, codes and regulations. The report contains two main pads, critical and noncritical violations. There are 28 violation areas, each of which is further divided into major and minor risk categories. The OIR consists of 3 pe~oes, a front page and two copies. Each page will have the same information on th6 fl-ont and back. The health inspector will retain two pages, while the remaining page witi be issued to the operaton When completed, the OIR provides the food service operator with important information to identify areas within the operation that have the greatest potential for the spread of foodborne illness. As you read the description of the OIR, please refer to the actual document on the next two pages. /,,~. ~,./ County of San Bernardino · Department of Public Health ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES ~.'~' ~'/ FOOD PROGRAM OFFICIAL INSPECTION REPORT www.sbco unt y,9 nv/debs TEMPERATURE CONTROLS Major Minor 1 Pr00erHCdin9 Temp. of PHF 113995. 113997, 114000,114003 OF2 Proper Cooking Temperatures - 113996 OF4 3 Proper Reheating of PHF - 113998 4 Proper Cooling of PHF - 114002 Proper Tha'~ng / Frozen Food Handling - 114085 IOF10 3 FOOD PROTECTION Major Food Frotected From Contamination, Adulteration, Speitage, Proper S[orage - 114003,114010, 114070,114080 iOF24 ' 5 Feed From anApproved Source, Hamest Tags - 1139RE lt4015,114003 Minor FOOD HANDLER I FACILITY CONDITION Major Minor 9 ! Proper Employee Hygiene -114020, 114022 I OF34 6 OF35 3 ~110~ HandwashingSinldSupplies- 114115, 114190 OF36 3 OF3712 , Unsanita~FoodFaciliiyConditions-114050 OF38 i40F39J~ 12 i Vermin Infestation- 114003, 114010. 114030, 114040,114080 OF404 OF4112 13'{ Waslewater Disposal & Plumbing- 114100, 114165 OF42 j3 OF43 i2 WATER I SANITIZING Ma}or Minor ~ Proper Manual San0izer I Proper SanitizJng of i~_t Utensils & Equipment- 114060, 114090 I OF54 [41OF5~~53 Proper Sanitizing of Food Contact Surfaces- 114090, 114160 I OF56 14 I OF5713 '0F59 i410F59 2 161 Potable Water Supply / Hot Water (120°F) - 114095 I NON-CRITICAL VIOLATIONS: All non-critical violations may pose a risk to public health. These violations must be corrected before the ne~(t routine inspection or as specified I the inspector. CERTIFICATION I PROTECTION / EQUIPMENT I UTENSILS Major Minor ] STRUCTURAL I RESTROOMS / JANITORIAL / SIGNS Major Minor / ' 1 ~" - -~-g ers ~ oo~ ~aa f~ty C~fic~i~ood Worke~'e~ffr~a~io n, ~ 23 Exdusion- 114145, 114150, 114155, 114050 i Perrnit . 113716, 113920, (SBCC 330410, 33044) ~OF6~ 2~ !FI°°rs , Walls , Ceiling Clean & In oo°d Repair & Vermin I OF82 !30FR3! I 18 ShermanFood&Drug/Labels/HACCP 114055.114056, 25 T9; ~;~e~e~uard~13980~ .... OFT0i2IO~I~ ~tr~omsCleanandlnGoodRepair-114105,1141401(SBCC33048 ! F I F 201 ProbeandRefngeralorThermometers-113995 OF721 OF73i I Seepi~g Quarters-114135,114175 j~F7__4'~lOF75'r11 iOispesal-l14025`114035`lt4169 OFg012 °~9~1~ -2~[ Proper Sbns/Exclusion of/iveAnimais- 114021,114045,113946 [ 0F92 ~i eqdpme~ 7~-e~orage, Oea nliness, Condition - 114050 ITEM SUMMARY OF THE CORRESPONDING LAWS AND REGULATIONS FOR THE VIOLATIONS LISTED ON THE FRONT SiDE Of THIS FORM. TEMPERATURE CONTROLS such as rodents (rats, mice), cockroaches, flies, etc (H4040) Understanding Your Grade The purpose in performing food inspections is to protect the public by reducing and preventing incidents of foodborne illness. The Division of Environmental Health Services employs the grading system as an indicator that the public can use to determine the standing of an establishment in conforming to current health and safety requirements. Violations on the OIR have been assigned a specific point value based on the associated public health risk. The grade or score the food establishment receives reflects the status of the food establishment at the time of the inspection only. Each food inspection begins with 100 points. As the health inspector conducts the inspection, violations found are marked on the corresponding box of the OIR. The point value from each marked violation is summed and this total is then deducted from the initial 100 points. Letter grades are assigned based on the establishment's score as indicated in the chart below. Letter grades will be posted in food establishments located in the unincorporated areas of San Bemardino County and on a voluntary basis by establ/$hments within cities who have not adopted the ABC Grading Ordinance. Beginning of the Inspection Total Points Deducted Remaining Points 100 points = Score 90 to 100 points A 80 to 89 points 70 to 79 points C 0 to 69 points Score & Closure Generally superior in food handling practices and overall food establishment maintenance and sanitation. Generally acceptable in food handling practices and overall food establishmen~ maintenance and sanitation. A re-score inspection is required to improve food handling practices and overall general food establishment maintenance and sanitation. Generally poor food handling practices and overall food establishment maintenance and sanitation. At the conclusion of the routine inspection, the Environmental Health Inspector will place a placard containing the grade and a summary of the inspection (ISR) in the establishment's window or other approved location. If a food establishment receives an "A" grade, there will be no re-score inspection required. If a food establishment receives a "B" grade, there will be nc re-score inspection required. However, if an operator wishes the opportunity to improve the grade but does not want to wait for the next visit by the inspector, a re-score inspection can be requested. The re-score inspection will incur a charge for the time required to perform the evaluation. If a food establishment receives a "C" grade, the violations must be con'ected and the food establishment must file a written request for a re-score inspection within 30 days of receiving the OIR to avoid closure of the food establishment. The health inspector will conduct the re- score inspection within 10 business days after receiving the written request from the food establishment and then post the resultant grade. DEHS will close a food establishment that does not receive at least a "B" grade on the re-score inspection. If a food establishment receives a score below 70, no grade will be issued. A Notice of Closure will be posted and the establishment will be closed for a period of no less than 24 hours. Such a establishment must request a re-score inspection and obtain at least a "B" grade to reopen. There may be other situations as determined by your health inspector that would make it necessary for the operation to immediately close. Any food establishment found to pose an immediate danger to the public's health and safety would be closed. Regardless of an establishment's grade or score, if an immediate danger exists, the establishment will be ordered to close. Examples of an immediate danger would include sewage backup, no hot water, power or water outages or the presence of cockroach or rodent infestations. When a food establishment is closed, the Puhtic .................. He2tth Pc~rmif !~ '* ~-u~-penaed .... and the health inspecto;' posts a "Notice of Closure" in an approved location. The Notice of Closure is to remain posted until removed by the health inspector. An establishment Lhat h~s been closed may request a re-score inspection, or a hearing to show cause why the permit suspension should be lifted or why the establishment permit should not be revoked. Each food esiablishment.~ reeuired, to n:,aintain a coov., of the n-,os? recent ,,~o, ~,_.~' mspectloi,' ' - report in the es[ab~lsitmei-¢: aF.,d Understandin the Inspection Summary Report (ISR) Or Grade Card The ISR will display info~-mation in addition to the letter grade. The health inspector marks the ISR as follows: The box marked "No Co~'rective Action Required" is checked when no violations are documented on the CIR. The box marked" Corrective Action Required in the Following Areas" is checked when violations are documented on the CIR. Directly below this section are several categories of violations that have corresponding check boxes. These boxes wilt be checked only when major violations are documented on the CIR. When only minor violations are found during an inspection the inspector will write, "minor violations observed" in the comments section. The following table will be used to determine what OIR violations correspond to the categories found on the ISR. Food Handling - Checked for OIR violation #17 Food Temperature- Checked for OIR violation #1,2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 Food Storage - Checked for OIR violation #7 and 19 Food Source and Labeling - Checked for OIR violation #8 and 18 Water Supply and Temperature - Checked for OIR violation #16 Utensil Washing and Sanitizing - Checked for OIR violation #14 Employee Practices - Checked for OIR violations #9 and 21 Equipment Sanitation - Checked for OIR violation #15 Equipment Maintenance - Checked for OIR violation #20, 22 and 25 Facility Sanitation - Checked for OIR violation #11 and 27 Facility Maintenance - Checked for OIR violation #10, 23, 24 and 28 Restroor,}s - Checked for OIR violation #26 Pest Cont~'oi - Checked for OiR violation #12 Waste MsRagement - Checked for OIR violation #13 Inspection Summary Repc rt For: Address: GRADE NO CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIRED CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIRED IN THE FOLLOWING AREAS: Food Handling Food Temperature Food Storage Food Source & Labeling Water Supply & Temerature Utensil Washing & Sanitizing Employee Practices a Equipment Sanitation :J Equipment Maintenance ,~ Facility Sanitation u Facility Maintenance L, Restrooms 9 Pest Control ,J Waste Management Comments A COMPLETE INSPECTION REPORT CAN BE VIEWED AT THIS FACILITY, UPON REQUEST AND IS AVAILABLE AT THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT TAMPERING OR REMOVAL Of THIS REPORT IS A VIOLATION OF S.B.C.C.§ San Bernardino County Depadment of Public Health, Division of Environmental Health Services 385 North Arrowhead Avenue 2nd Floor San Bernardino, CA 92415 (909) 387-4608 33.1406(e) ---!'J',qRC!'qMEN%AL HEALTH SPECIALIST How Violations Are Identified Proper Holding Temperature of PHF CURFFL 113995, 113997, 114000, 114003 Major Violations: Improper holding of Potemially Hazardoas Food (PIIF) between 50°F and 125°F. Minor Violations: PIIF temperature at improper holding fi'om 42°F to 49°F, or fi-om 126°F to 134°F. Food should bc evaluated ft~r time/temperature criteria prior to embargoing, or conducting a voluntary condemnation and dcstruction. With all temperature situations, time is also a facton *Rare roast bcef(i.e, prime rib) when cooked appropriately and held at 130" F with appropriate checks on temperature (cooking and holding) and time may not be considered a violation. *The REHS can still exercise judgment in the case wherc food is let't out for excessive periods, c.g. over tbur hoars, in thc minor violation range. If tbod is being prepared or handled pursuant to a HA.CCP plan or if time is used as a public health control, temperatxlrcs may be ~bund outside thc established range. Exceptions in CURFFL as of January 1, 2002 are foods that should be held at 45°F or below. Examples: Unshucked live molluscan shellfish Potentially hazardous food held for dispensing in serving lines and salad bars during periods not to exceed 12 hours in any 24-houtr period Pasteurized milk and pasteurized milk products in original, sealed containers Raw shell eggs not qualifying for exemption as described in section 113997 12 2. Proper Cooking Temperatures CURFFL 113996 Ma,ior Violations: PHF is cooked to temperatures less thau required hy CUI~,FFL (unable to meet required cooking temperatures). Inadequate customer notification of l~ood contaioing raw or less than thoroughly cooked eggs/grouad meat/poultry/pork/vcal/becf/lamb/fish/ scafood. Example: Dressing or sauce coutaining raw unpasteurized egg that is not disclosed orally or in writing This shall not apply' to PFIF that is cooked lo less than CURFFL spccifications at the consmncr's request. Proper Reheating of PHF CURFFL 113998 Major Violations: PHF not reheated to 165°Flor hot holdmg. Example: Leftover PltFfound beiog reheated in a steam table Minor Violations: N;A * Exceptions in CURFFL per section 113998. Any PH ready-to-eat food taken from a commercially processed, hermetically sealed container, or from an intact package from a food processing plant that is inspected by the food regulatory authority, shall be heated to a temperature of at least 135°F for hot'holding. A minimum temperature shall not be required if the food described is prepared for immediate service. 13 Proper Cooling of PHF CURFFL 114002 Major Violations: Any PHF not cooled according To CURFFL specifications as indicated. Example: Beans measure 110°F, cooling in adccp containcr in the ret*rigerator Minor Violations: PHF cooled asing incorrect practices but disco,, ered by inspector while temperatures are still in a safe range. Proper Thawing/Frozen Food Handling CURFFL 114085 Major Violations: hnproper thawing of PHF. Examples: PI-IF found thawing in standing water PHF found thawing at ambient room temperature Food should be evaluated for time/temperature criteria prior to cmbargoiog, or conducting a voluntary condcnmation and destruction. Minor ViolaS:ion: Raw food found thaw. cd and refi'ozcn without being cooked or otherwise processed. Example: Bulk raw chicken pieces thai have been thawed, individually packed and rcfrozen Food found defrosting in]properly but still below 41°F at time of obser,,,ation. Diligent Preparation/Time Only Control CURFFL 113995 Major Violations: When lime only, rather than time in conjunction with temperature, is used as the public health control for a working supply of potentially hazardous food before cooking, or for ready-to-eat potentially hazardous food Ihat is displayed or held for immediale consumption. 14 Examples: The food is marked or otherwise identified to iudicate the time that is Ibor hours after the lime when the food is removed fi-om temperature control The food is cooked and served, served if ready-to-cat, or discarded, within R)ur hours afl. er the time wheu thc tbod is removed from temperature control Food is in a marked container or package, or is marked so as not to exceed a 4-hour time limit Written procedures {hat ensure compliance with this paragraph and section 114002 for R>od that is prepared, cooked, and refrigerated before time is used as a public hcahh control are mainlaincd in thc fbod establishment and made available to the enf'orccment agency upou request Minor Violations: N/A Food Protected from Contamination, Adulteration, Spoilage, Proper Storage CURFFL 114003, 114010, 114070, 114080 Major Violations: Adulterated/Contaminated Food. Exmnples: Any food products that arc aduhcratcd anti pose an imlncdiatc risk of injnry or illness. The instJeclor should document wto; /he.food ix uchdlerrtted. Physical or chemical contamination of thod (i.e. sulfitcs) Foreign object fbund in food product Rodent or insect contaminated food product Marinating spoiled mcat, or dipping spoiled mcat in blood to conceal spoilage Contamiaatkm by chemical substance or excessive food additives Processing food outdoors Employee handling ready-to-caf' fbod without washing hands after handling raw mcat Obvious cross contamination between raw and rcady4o-cat tbod Commingling of shellfish/improper wet storage of shellfish A gross contamination to food contact sur}hccs Washing hands/utensil over fbod Preparation/storage of food in unclean sinks used to defPost meats or preparation/storage of fbod in a mop sink Damaged canned goods fbund to bc leaking or that have been adulterated 15 Minor Violations: hnpropcr tbod storage methods: Examplcs: Cauncd [hod products with dented seams Uncovered containers of prepared food where overhead contamination potential exists Double stacking food inside rel?igcrators without adequate covers Food stored outside the fbod establishment (See CURFFL section 114145 for exemptions, i.e. beverage bars, dining areas, open air BBQ's etc.) Food stored less than 6"off thc floor (Large or bulky containers and doilies, racks, and pallets are acceptable altenmtivcs if easily moveable) Food stored in unapproved interior areas of the l'ood establishment Linens used as basket liners not laundered between customers Bulk food containers without labels idemil'ying common name of food Lack of approved scoops used for dispensing bulk t'ood Raw meat over ready-to-eat food but no contamination observed In-use food utensil(s) stored improperly, such as not under ronning water, not cleaned/sanitized every 4 hours, crc. Plastic sbopping bags used for food slorage Using an unapprovcd rubber mat or cloth under the cutting board Storing acidic £ood in open tin cans Food stored in ,..mapproved containers Potential contamination of food as a result of proxinfity to thc splash area of sinks 8. Food from an Approved Source, Harvest Tags CURFFL 113980, 114015, 114003 M a jot Violations: Food that has bccn detem~incd to be from an unapprovcd source. Exmnples: Shellfish harvcstcd from mlapprovcd watcrs Animal from a personal hunting trip served Food received at food establishment fi'om an unpcrmitted cstablishmcnt (private homes) Food that has been previously served to a customer and then re-served to a diffcrcnt customer or thc food is used for preparation ~)l'anothcr dish. Example: Re-served tortilla ch~ps or re-served steamed rice used in the preparation of liricd rice 16 /?3 Minor Violations: Failure to maintain shellfish ccrtification tzgs/rccords l'or 90 days l'rom rcccipt. Proper Employee Hygiene CURFFL 114020, 114022 Major Violations: Employee has cuts, rashes, and sores that arc likely to transmit diseases while performing their duties. Haadling lbod with bandage/open wound on the hand without approved covering and gloves. Employees fail to ,,,,;ash their hands as required. Examples: Food handler fails to wash hands after returning from a nonfood related activity Employee observed to have dirty hands and nails Employee touchcs any body part and resmncs handling food Employees engage in such activities such as smoking in lhc Food prcparation area, licking fingers, touching mouth, touching nose, and picking cars, expectorating, or touchiag hair. Observation of an employee working while sick. Improper glove usage leading to contamination of tbod products. Example: Failure to replace gloves after handling raw animal products Minor Violations: Improper glove usage. Examp!c: Arlificial nails worn, but ao glovcs being used Employee observed eating/drinkiug in thc work area. Employee drinks fi_}und on a preparation lablc or other iUod contact surfiace. Indications of eating, drinking and/or smoking in unapproved areas. Example: Cigarette butts found on the floor at the cook's station Lack of clean, washable outer garments or other clean tmi~bm'~s. Inadequate hair confinement. Example: Lack of approved hair restraints Multiplc/unclcanable rings worn by fbod handler. "I¢'-/ 10. Handwashing Sink/Supplies CURFFL 114115, 114190 Major Violatinns: Lack of bandwashiog siok(s). Exarcple: Handxvashiug sink rercoved after final walk-through inspection by Plan Check No rurtning water at handwashing sink(s). No holAercpered water at the handwashing sink{s). Lack of soap/towels/drying device at the handwashing sink{s) Examples: Missing/empty/nonfunctional single service §oap and/or towel dispensers Handwashing sink blocked/inaccessible Missing Paucet and/or handle at sittk Minor Violations: Bar snap being used. Unapprox, ed dispensers being used. Thc prcmixing faucet does not stay on tbr thc required lO-second mini~num time. 11. Unsanitary Food Establishment Conditions CURFFL 114050 Major Violations: Severe accunmlation offihh (rcold, debris, grime, elco that rcay lead to l~od contarcination. Minor violations: Widespread accumulation offihh that does not pose a direct risk of fi,od contamination. 12. Vermin Infestation CURFFL 114003, 114010, 114030, 114040, 114080 Major Violations: Active heavy in~'cstations of rodents, insects, birds, or fowl that have resuhcd in contamination of fi)od contact surfhces ur adulteration off [bod. Evidence rcust bc indicative of an active infcstalion. One or rcore signs off an active infestation off rodents. 18 Example: F 'esh droppings, gnaw marks, nesting, rub marks, or live rodeuts observed m a critical arca(s) (t'ood preparation, food slorage, and utensil washing/storage areas) Live cockroaches that indicate an active infestation throughout the critical areas. Other vcrmia present that indicaxe an active infestation. Example: Flies throughout thc critical areas Minor violations: Evidence of rodem, coc~-oach, aad/or insect activity tha! do not pose an immediate risk to the public's health and safety. Examples: Observed holes and gaps with indicatioa o£old rodcm activity such as nesting, material, dead rodent carcass, etc. Observed holes and gaps with evidence of cockroach harborag~ such as egg casings, dead cockroaches, fecal matter Old rodcnt droppings fouad under a storage shelf Flies observed in the noncritical areas Ants found on the floor in tile storage room Flics and maggots observed in thc dmnpstcr area outside the establishment 13. Wastewater Disposal & Plumbing CURFFL 114100, 114165 Major Violations: Sewage overflowing onto thc. floor inside or near the f, remi~n'; ora ,cc, ad establishment. A cross connection. Examples: An ice machine drain line direclly colmcctcd to a sewer A hose attached to ally tixture outlcl that extends below the rim of any sink without an approved backflow prevention device A missing atmospheric vacuum breaker, on thc discharge side of last control valve, for a garbage grinder flash system or mechanical dishwasher hnpropcr disposal of liquid wastc. Example: Disposing mop water into any sink ins~cacl of thc janiturial sink Minm' Violations: Lack of janitorial sink (except in preexisting establishments). bnpropcr sewage disposal system/practices. Examples: Disposing liquid waste indirectly or directly into a stom~ drain, alleyway, parking lot, or other anapproved areas \Vashing down mats or grease filters in unappros ed outside areas Reach-in refrigerator draining to a bucket/floor/pan Drain line without an air gaI) Slow draining/clogged floor sink (not overflowing) Flexible drain line used to discharge condensate l?om a rcfi-igcrator A drain line leak from any sink Leaking lhucet at sink Uncapped drain l iae Atmospheric vacuum breaker not installed at least 6" above the highest point ofv,,ater usage 14. Proper Guide Sanitizer/Proper Sanitizing of Utensils and Equipment CURFFL 114060, 114090 Major Violations: Violations that involve thc inability or thilure to sanitize multi-nsc utensils. Lack of washing/sanitizing equipment. hnpropcr sanitizing of I~i tchcn utensils. Absence of soap or sanitizing solution or thc inabili~, to heat sanitize. Examples: No detectable sanitizer duriug manual/mechanical dishwashing temperature of' 180°F at the manitbld. Minor Violations: Improper sanitizer concentration. Failure to sanitize probe thermometers bcfore each usc. Lack of sanitizcr test strips. Lack of or inaccurate temperature gauges tbr heat sanitizing equipment. 15. Proper Sanitizing of Food Contact Surfaces CURFFL 114090, 114160 Majnr Violations: bnpropcr cleaning and saniti×ing of' fbod contact surfaces. 20 Example: Failure to clean and sanitize food contact surfaces after proccssing raw meats and before haudling ready-to-eat food Sloring towels in a buckct with excessively soiled waler. No measurable sanitizcr in tim bucket(s) used to hold wiping towels. Multiple wiping towels used more than oacc for wiping food preparalion surl~aces, and not stored in a sanhizcr solution bucket after each usc. Minor Violations: Lack of sauitizer test strips (lfcited above in #14, do not citc here). Soap and sanitizer combined for use rather than used separately. Clean linens are stored with dirty linens. Soiled linens are not kept in designated coutaiuers. Lineas are found on the/leer. Failure to provide/store lineas properly. 15. Potable Water Supply/Hot Water (120°F) CURFFL 114095 Major Violations: Food establishments that handle open food or multi-use utensils with hot water temperature of 110°F or less. Food establishment lacks an adequate, potable, pressurized, protcctcd supply of hot and cold waten (Lack of hot water at a prepackaged cstablishment should result in a reinspection.) Minor Violations: water temperature et' 11 I"F to 119°F. Lack of potable water to a limited area at less critical locations v, itbin a food establishment permitted to sell open fbod. No available potable water supply at thc mop sink. lT. Managers Food Safety Certification, Food Worker Certification, Permit CURFFL 113716, 113920, (SBCC 33.0410, 33.044) Major Violations: Failure to provide a valid cot'tiffed Food Maaager, (Establishment may have up to 60 (lays 1o comply under certain couditions as indicated in CURFFL scc6ou 113716 Failure to provide CUlTen! Food [{andling cards [*or >50% of food workers, 21 Workers shall oblain cards within 14 days of employment. Failure to submit: plans lbr tl~e construction or rcmodcl of a food establishment. Operating without a valid health permit. Operating beyond the limit of thc original permit. Minor Violations: Food Manager certificate/Food Handling cards not available |bt reviev,,-. Thc approved seating capacity, allowed by thc permit has been exceeded. Remodeling without submitting plans. 18. Sherman Food & Drug/Labels/HACCP CURFFL 114055, 114056, 114003, 114057, 110660-110805, 111200-111220, 110370 Major Violations: Food establishment fails to f'ollow an approved HACCP plan when required. Out-of-date baby formula being sold. Multiple prepackaged tbods not properly labeled. Minor Violations: Violations regarding truth in advertising. Examples: hnproper Iai content in hamburger Menu item served is of lowcr or poorer quality than ,.',-as advertised A product substitution (such as imitation crab instead ofrdal crab) Previously frozen fish is advertised as "fi'csh' Advertising ground chicken product as a "chicken b~cast" Bulk food containers are not labeled or are improperly labeled. 19. Sneeze Guard Protection CURFFL 113980, 114080 Major Violations: Failure to protect food/food utensils from droplet coatamination. Examplcs: Food displayed without a sacczc guard Utensils not being protected from contamination Minor Violations: Unapproved/iuadequately constructed sneeze guard. Cracked or soiled sneeze guard. 22 20. Probe and Refrigerator Thermometers CURFFL 113995 Majur Violations: No probe thermometer(s) available or hi usc. 50% or more of thc required thermometers arc missing or arc nonfi~nctional. Exalnple: 4 rel'rigerators arid 2 arc missing thermometers Minor Violations: Thermometer(s) not readily visible. Thermometers not in the wintriest part of thc refrigerator. Thermometer is inaccurate (>±2°F). 21. Employee Personal Items, Employee Changing Room, Sleeping Quarters CURFFL 114135, 114175 Major Violations: Living/'slccping quarters within the establishment. Example: Bedding observed Minor Violations: Employee clothing/personal belongings stored outside designated areas. hnpropcr storage of employee personal food in refrigerators. Changing room cluttered or unclean. Changing room has bccn converted to another usc. 22. Equipment/Utensils; Storage, Cleanliness, Condition CURFFL 114050, 114065, 114090 Violatiuns: Food held in iuoperable hol/cold holding equipment. Gross accunrulation of grease, filth and/or food debris on {'ood conlact surfaces. Example: Uncleanable cuuing board with deep pits. Widespread disrepair of equipmenl and utensils. 23 Minnr Violations: Utensils/equipment in disrepair. Examples: Wrapping utensil handles with cloth, string or tape Broken/cracked bandies on utensils Using a cup without a handle to dispense bulk fbod A cracked sink Chipped dishes aod glassxvare Rust~, shelving Missing refrigerator handle Inoperable icc machine Missing fan guards in refrigerators Unclean mcnsits/cquipment Dirty utensils comnfingled wilh clean utensils Missing/dirtyhnoldy fan guard in refi'igeralors Dirty food storage containers Moldy refrigerator gaskels Floor sink soiled with Food debris Dirty handwashing sink Lining shelves with cardboard or aluminum tbil Icc buildup in the walk-in refrigerator/fi'cezer Pots/pans stored directly on lhe floor Utensils stored in a hand sink or mop sink. Violations involving the design/approval, storage, operation/installation of cquipmcnt/ulensils used for serving, preparation, storage, transpo~gation or display of Examples: Unappmved faucet extension at thc thrcc-compaiqnmnt sink Using milk crates as shelving and/or k~r sloring utensils or food Knives stored iu an unapprovcd iocaiion or holder such as a wood block · Three-comlmrtment sink too small io handle largest utensil Using unapproved utensils/cutting boards Using eqtfipment that is nol ANSI certified 23. Floors/Walls/Ceiling Clean and In Good Repair and Vermin Exclusion CURFFL 114145, 114150, 114155, 114050 Ma,ior Violations: Violations that may result in the contamination/adulteration of fbod, involving walls, ceilings and floors, including those inside a walk-in refrigerator. 24 Examples: Peeling paint/plas/cr on walls or ceilings Missing/dctcrioraled ceiling surfhces as a result of active water intrusion Gross accumulation of mold, grease, and/or filth on walls, ceilings and/or floors Damaged walls such as gaps/holes in wails Minor Violations: Violations tlmt arc not extensive or violations that involve the possible entrance of vermin, including rodents and insccts. Examples: Dc-activated air curtain inadequate air cmtain to prevent the entrance of flies Pass-thru window lef:t open A gap under the door greater than % iuch A produce stand that has more than one side open to the outside air during business hours Ceiling panels soiled with accumulated dust/grease Make-up air vent/ceiling vent accumulated with grease Decomposed food products/grease buildup on floors Missing base coving or floor tiles, missing or deteriorated grout between floor tiles or carpet on floors in unapproved areas Loose FRP or metal flashing Cardboard used on the floor Rusty ceiling in walk-in cooler 24. Adequate Lighting and Shatter Guards CURFFL 114170 Major Violations: Inoperable/missing light in walk-iu refi'igcrator/freczcr/food preparation/ utensil washing area. Inadequate lighting in food preparation and utensil washing areas Missing light shickls or nonshatlcrproof bulbs. Minor Violations: End caps missing to light fixtures. Shields accumulated with dust/grease and dead insects. hmdcquatc lighting. 25 27. 26 25. Exhaust System Clean and In Good Repair CURFFL 114050, 114140 *la.ior Violations: N~)nfunctional exhaust hood. Improper hood type or absence of hood. Example: Type II hood above the deep fryer instead of Type 1 Reasonable comfort is not being met For the cmployees. Multiple filters are missing. Minor Violations: Hood lacks minimum 6" overhang ovcr equipment. Hood, although opcrable, is not on during cooking. Hood not fimctioning adcqnatcly. Ventilation hood not maintained clean. 26. Restrooms Clean and In Good Repair CURFFL 114105, 114140 and S.B.C.C. Section 33.048 Major Violatinns: No operable toilets available R)r cmployec use. Urinals inoperable, toilet improperly secured, lcaking at thc base tlr cracked. A rcqnircd second restroom has bcen permanently removcd/convc~lcd. Alcohol bcing served without the two required rcstrooms. Lack of warm water/soap/paper towels/toilet tissue. No public rcstrooms accessible whcn required. Minor Violations: Uncleaa restroom l'acilities. Lack of approved dispensers. Inoperable ceiling fan in restroom. No ventilation in the restroom. Restroom door is not self-closing. A rcquircd second rcstroom is temporarily out of service. Chemical Use/Storage, Janitorial'Closet, Mop Sink, Waste Disposal CURFFL 114025, 114035, 114165 :Major ViolaHons: hnproper storage or use of pesticides, inseclicides, rodcnticidcs, or nonlbod chemicals that pose a high risk to public health. Examples: Open container of bleach/sanilizer abovc a lbod preparation area Automatic insecticide spray dispenser in a l'bod or utensil arco An unapproved insecticide used in tile food cstablishment. Chemicals slored m a food container (chcmical mistaken for food product). Using an nnapprovcd food equipment hlbricant. Miuor Violations: hnproper storage of pesticides or chemicals that pose a low risk to pnblic health. An unapproved insect electrocutiou device found within an open i'ood or utensil area. Unlabcled spray bottle itl the kitchen. An unapprovcd pesticide found in the.iauitorial closet. Exterior refuse/grease container lids Icft open or missing. Refuse containers cucrustcd with waste. Leakinw~overflowing refuse containers. Janitorial sink in disrcpair and/or has an accumulation of fillh. Trash uot bagged and tied prior to bcing disposed. Broom stored in food preparation area, mop bucket itl food area. 28. Proper Signs/Exclusion of Live Animals CURFFL 114021, 114045, 113946 Ma,ior ViolaHons: Animals observed in the establishment, with thc exception of service ............ m .... dining room. Minor Violations Failure to post ~hc health permit and/or any of the following signs: hand washing sign, no smoking sign, oyster warning sign. and the letter grade. Examples: Failnrc to post the establishment's hcahh pcrmh in a conspicuous place. Lack cfa written warning sign tbr thc consumption of raw oysters harvested from the Gulf of Mexico. As a general rule for afl minor violations: Repeated same minor violations may be written up as major violations at the next routine inspection. How Violations Are Identified Proper Holding Temperature of PHF CURFFL 113995, 113997, 114000, 114003 Major Violations: Improper holding of Potentially 11azardous Food (PIIF) between 50°F and 125°F. Minor Violations: PHF temperature at improper holding h-om 42°F to 49°F, or fi'om 126°F to 134°F. Food should be evaluated for time/temperature criteria prior 'to embargoing, or conducting a voluntary condemnation and destruction. With all temperature situations, time is also a Pacton *Rare roast beef (i.e. prime rib) when cooked appropriately and held at 130° F wilh appropriate checks on temperature (cooking and holding) and time may not be considered a violation. *The REHS can still exercise judgment in thc case where food is left out for excessive periods, e.g. over I'our hours, in thc minor violation range. If tbod is being prepared or hand]ed pnrsuant to a HACCP plan or if time is used as a public health control, temperatures may bc fYund outside the established range. Exceptions in CURFFL as of January 1, 2002 are foods that should be held at 45°F or below. Examples: Unshucked live molluscan shellfish Potentially hazardous food held for dispensing in serving lines and salad bars during periods not to exceed 12 hours in any 24-hour period Pasteurized milk and pasteurized milk products ia original, sealed containers · Raw shell eggs not qualifying for exemption as described in section 113997 12 2. Proper Cooking Temperatures CURFFL 113996 Ma.lot Violations: PH F is cooked to temperatures less thau required by CURFFL (unable to meet required cooking temperatures). Inadequate costomer notification of food containing raw or less than thoroughly cooked eggs/ground meat/poultry/pork/veal/beefflamb/fish/ seafood. Example: Dressing or sauce containing raw unpasteurizcd egg that is not disclosed orally or in writing This shall not apply to PHF that is cooked to less than CURFFL specifications al fl~e consumer's request. Proper Reheating of PHF CURFFL 113998 5lajor Violations: PIIF not reheated to 165°F for hot holding. Example: Leftover PHF found being reheated in a steam table .,Minor Violations: N/A * Exceptions in CURFFL per section 113998. Any PH ready-to-eat food taken from a commercially processed, hermetically sealed container, or from an intact package from a food processing plant that is inspected by the food regulatory authority, shall be heated to a temperature of at least 135°F for hot holding. A minimum temperature shall not be required if the food described is prepared for immediate service. 4. Proper Cooling of PHF CURFFL 114002 Major Violations: Any PHF not cooled according to CURFFL specifications as indicated. Example: Beans measure 1 I 0°F, cooling in a deep containcr iii the refrigerator Minor Violations: PHF co61ed using inco~mect practices but discovered by inspector while temperatures are still in a safe range. Proper Thawing/Frozen Food Handling CURFFL 114085 Major Violations: hnproper thawing of PHF. Examples: PHF found thawing in standing water - PHF found thawing at ambient room temperature Food should be evaluated for time/temperature criteria prior to embargoing, or condocting a voluntary condemnation and dcstruction. Minor Violation: Raw food found thawed and refi'ozco without bcing cooked or othcrwise processed. Example: Bolk raxv chicken pieces that have been thawcd, individually packcd and refrozen Food found d¢£rosting improperly but still below 41°F al time of obsc~,ation. Diligent Preparation/Time Only Control CURFFL 113995 Major Violations: Wheo time on[y, rather than time in conjunction with temperature, is used as the public heahh coutrol fnr a working supply ol~potentially hazardous food bet'ore cooking, or for ready-to-eat potentially hazardous l'ood that is displayed or held for immediate consumption. 14 Examples: Thc Food is marked or otherwise identified 'to indicate the time that is four hours after the time when the food is removed fi'om temperah~rc control The Food is cooked and ser,,=cd, served if ready-to-cat, or discarded, within Four hours after the time when the ['ood is removed fi-om temperature control Food is in a marked container or package, or is marked so as not to exceed a 4-hour time limit Written procedures that ensure compliance with this paragraph and section 114002 for Food that is prepared, cooked, and refrigerated belbre time is used as a public health control are ~naintaincd in thc fbod establishment and made available to the enforccment agency upon requesl Minor Violations: N/A Food Protected from Contamination, Adulteration, Spoilage, Proper Storage CURFFL 14003, 114010, 114070, 114080 Major Violations: Adulterated/Contaminated Food. Examples: Any ?ood products that are adultcratcd and pose an immediate risk of injury or illness. The i~,v)ector ,~hou[d c[oct~me~t w/(~: /he ft)od ix Physical or chemical contamination of food (i.e. sulfitcs) Foreign object found in food product Rodeni or insect contaminated food product Marinating spoiled mcat, or dipping spoiled meat in blood to conccal spoilage Contamiaation by chemical substancc or excessive l'ood additives Processing food outdoors Employee handling ready-to-eat food without washing hands af'tcr handling raw mcat Obvious cross contamination between raw and ready-to-cat Food Commingling of shellfish/improper wet storage of shellfish A gross contamination to fbod contact surfaces Washing hands/utensil over fbod Preparation/storage of Food in unclean sinks used to deft;esi meats or prel)aration/storagc of fbod in a mop sink Damaged canned goods fkmnd to be leaking or that have bcen adulterated Minor Violations: hnproper fbod storage methods: Examples: Canned fbod products with dented seams Uncovered containers of prepared tbod where overhead contamination potential exists Double stacking food inside refrigerators without adcqnatc covers Food stored outside the fbod establishment (See CURFFL section l 14145 tbr exemptions, i.e. beverage bars, dining areas, open air BBQ's etc.) Food stored less than 6"off the floor (Large or bulky containers and dollies, racks, and pallcts are acceptable altenmtives if easily moveable) Food stored in unapproved interior areas of the l'ood establishment Lineus used as basket liners not laundered between customers Bulk food containers without labels identit'ying common name of food Lack of approved scoops oscd for dispensing bulk food Raw meat over ready-to-eat food but no contamination observed In-use food utensil(s) stored improperly, such as not under running water, not cleaned/sanitized every 4 bouts, etc. Plastic shopping bags used for food storage Using au unapproved rubber mat or cloth under the cutting board Storing acidic food in open tin cans Food stored in tmapproved containers Potential contamination of food as a result of prnximity to the splash area of sinks Food from an Approved Source, Harvest Tags CURFFL 113980, 114015, 114003 Major Violations: Food that bas been detem~ined to be from an unapprovcd sonrce. Examples: Shellfish harvested from unapproved waters Animal f?om a personal hunting trip served Food received at tbod establishment from an unpermitted estabhshment (private homes) Food that has been previously serx cd to a customer and then re-served to a different customer or thc ~bod is used lk~r preparation of another dish. Example: Re-scrved tortilla chips or re-served steamed rice ased in the preparation of f¥ied rice 16 Minor Violations: Failure to maintain shellfish certification tags/records l-bt 90 days fi:om receipt. Proper Employee Hygiene CURFFL 114020, 114022 Major Violations: Employee has cuts, rashes, and sores that are likely to transmit diseases while perlbrming their duties. ttandling ii*od with bandagc/opeu wound on thc hand without approved covering and gieves. Employees fail to wash their bauds as required. Examples: Food handler fails to wash hands after returning from a nonfood related activity Employee observed to have dirty hands and nails Employee touches any body part and resumes handling food Employees engage in such activities such as smoking in the food preparation area, licking fiugers, touching mouth, touching nose, and pickiug ears, expectoratiag, or touching hair. Observation of an employee working while sick. Improper glove usage leading to contamination of fbod products. Example: Failure to rep]acc gloves after haud]ing raw aaimal products Minor Violations: Improper glove usage. Example: Artificial nails worn, but no gloves being used Employee observed eating/drinking in the work area. Employee driuks fbund on a preparation table or other tbod coutact surlhce. Indications of eating, drinking and~'or smoking in unapproved areas. Example: Cigarette butts fouad on the floor at the cook's station Lack ot'clcaa, washable outer gam~ents or other clean unifom~s. Inadequate hair confinement. Example: Lack of approved hah' rcslraints Mnltiplc/nncleaaablc rings worn by food haad]cr. 17 10. Handwashing Sink/Supplies CURFFL 114115, 114190 Ma,ior Violations: Lack of handwaslfing sink(s). Example: }landwashing sink removed after final walk-through inspection by Plan Check No running watcr at handwashing sink(s). No hofftempercd water at the handwashing sink(s). Lack of soap/towels/d~qng device at the handwashing sink(s) Examples: Missing/empty/nonfi~nctional single servicc soap and/or towel dispensers }landwashing si~tk blocked/inaccessible Missing faucet and/or handle at sink Minor ~qolations: Bar soap being used. Unapproved dispensers being used. The prcmixing faucet does not stay on for thc required 1 O-second minimum time. 11. Unsanitary Food Establishment Conditions CURFFL 114050 Major Violationsi Severe accumulation o1' filth (mold, debris, grime, elc.) that may lead to food contamination. Minor violations: Widespread accumulation of filth that docs not pose a direct risk of fbod contamination. 12. Vermin Infestation CURFFL 114003, 114010, 114030, 114040, 114080 Major Violations: Active heavy infestations of rodents, insects, birds, or fowl that have resulted in contamination oftbod contact snrfhces or adulteration of food. Evidence must be indicative of an active infestation. One or more signs of an active infestation of rodents, 18 Example: Fresh droppings, gnaw ~narks, nesting, rub marks, or live rodents obscrvcd in a critical area(s) (food preparation, food storage, and utensil washing/storage areas) Live cockroaches that indicate an active infcslation throughout the critical areas. Other vermin present that iudicatc an activc ini'cstation. Example: Flies throughout thc critical arcas Minor violations: Evidence of rodent, cockd'oach, and/or insect activity that do not pose an immediate risk to the public's health and safety. Examples: Observed holes and gaps with indication of old rodent activity such as nesting, material, dead rodent carcass, etc. Observed holes and gaps with evidence of cockroach harborage such as egg casings, dead cockroaches, fecal matter Old rodent droppings found under a storage shelf Flies observed in the noncritical areas Ants found on thc floor in the storage room Flies and maggots observed in the dumpstcr area outside the establishment 13, Wastewater Disposal& Plumbing CURFFL 114100, 114165 Major Violations: Sewage overflowing onto thc floor inside or near tl~e premises nfa food establishment. A cross comlection. Examples: An ice machine drain line directly conncctcd to a sewer A hose attached to any fixture outlet that extends below the rim of any sink without an approved backflow prevention device A missing atmospheric vacuum breaker, on thc discharge side of last control valve, for a garbage grinder flush system or mechanical dishwasher hnproper disposal of Ii.quid wastc. Example: Disposing mop water into any siak instead of the janitorial sink 19 Minor Violations: Lack of janitorial sink (except in precxisting establishments). hupropcr sewage disposal system/practices. Examples: Disposing liquid waste indirectly or directly into a storm drain, alleyway, parking lot, or other unapproved areas Washing down mats or grease filters in unapproved oulside areas Reach-in refrigerator draining to a bucket/flooffpan Drain line without an air gap Slow draining/clogged floor sink (not overflowing) Flexible drain line used to discharge condensate ['rom a rel¥igerator A drain line leak from any sink Leaking faucet at sink Uncapped drain line Atmospheric vacuum breaker not installed at least 6" above the highest poiat of water usagc 14. Proper Guide Sanitizer/Proper Sanitizing of Utensils and Equipment CURFFL 114060, 114090 Major Violations: Violations that involve thc inability or thilure to sanitize multi-usc utensils. Lack of washing/sanitizing equipment. hnproper sanitizing of kitchen utensils. Absence of soap or sanitizing solution or the inability to heat sanitize. Examples: No detectable sanitizcr during manual/mechanical dishwasbing High temperature dish machine tails to reach a minimum temperature of 180°F at thc manifold. Minor Violations: lmpropcr sanitizer concentration. Failure to sanitize probe thermometers bctbre each usc. Lack of sanitizer test strips. Lack of or inaccurate temperature gauges ibr heat sanitizing equipment. 15. Proper Sanitizing of Food Contact Surfaces CURFFL 114090, 114160 Major Violations: Improper cleaning and sanitizing of' fbod contact surfaces. 20 Exmnple: Failure to clean and sanitize food contact surl'aces after processing raw meats and before handling rcady-to-eal [bod Storing towels in a bucket with excessively soiled water. No measurable sanitizer in the bucket(s) used to hold wiping towels. Multiple wiping towels used more than once t'or wiping ['(>od preparation surfaces, and not stored in a sanitizer solutiou bucket after each use. Mioor Violations: Lack of sarfitizer test strips (If cited above m #14, do not cite here). Soap and sanitizer combined for use rather thaa used separatcly. Clean linens are stored with dirty linens. Soiled linens are not kept in desi~,mated contaiaers. Linens are found on the floor. Failure to provide/store linens properly. 16. Potable Water Supply/Hot Water (120°F) CURFFL 114095 Major Violations: Food establishments that handle open food or mu[ti-use utensils with hot water temperatm'e of 110°F or less. Food establishment lacks an adequate, potable, pressurized, protected supply of hot and cold watcr. (Lack of hot water at a prepackaged establishment should result in a reinspcction.) Mioor Violations: Food establishments that handle open food or multi-usc ute~si!s with a water temperature of I 1 l"F to 119°F. [,ack of potable water to a limited area at less critical locations within a food establishment permitted lo sell open fbod. No available potable water supply at the mop sink. 17. Managers Food Safety Certification, Food Worker Certification, Permit CURFFL 113716, 113920, (SBCC 33.0410, 33.044) Major Violations: Failurc to provide a valid certified Food Manager. (Establishment may have up to 60 days to comply under certain conditions as indicated in CURFFL section 113716 (b)) Failm'e to provide current Food Handling cards fo;' >50% ol~ fi.~od v,'orkers. 21 Workers shall obtain cards within 14 days of employment. Failure to sublnit plans fbr the construction or remodel ora food establishment. Operating withoat a valid bcallh pemfit. Operating beyond the limit of the original permit. Minor Violations: Food Manager certificate/Food Handling cards not available for review, The approved seating capacity, allowed by the permit has been exceeded. Remodeling witbout submitting plans. 18. Sherman Food & Drug/Labels/HACCP CURFFL 114055, 114056, 114003, 114057, 110660-110805, 111200-111220, 110370 19. 22 Maim- Violations: Food establishment fails t() follow an approved HACCP plan wben required. Out-of-date baby forlnula being sold. Multiple prepackaged foods not properly labeled. Minor Violations: Violations regarding truth in advertising. Examples: hnproper fat content ia hamburger Menu item served is of lower or poorer quality than was advertised A product substitution (such as imitation crab instead of real crab) Previously frozen fish is advertised as "fi'esh' Advertising ground chicken product as a "chicken breast" Bulk food containers are not labeled or arc improperly labeled. Sneeze Guard Protection CURFFL 113980, 114080 Major Violations: Failure to prelect food/food utensils from droplet contamination. Examples: Food displayed without a sneeze guard Utensils not being protected from contamination Minor Violations: Unapproved/inadequatcly constructed sneeze guard. Cracked or soiled sneeze guard. 20. Probe and Refrigerator Thermometers CURFFL 113995 Major Violations: No probe thermometer(s) available or in use. 50% or more of the required thcrmou]ctcrs are missing or are nonfitnctional.. Example: 4 rcl¥igerators and 2 are missing thermomelcrs Minor Violations: Thermometer(s) not readily visible. Thermometers not in the warmest part of the rcfrigcrator. Thermometer is inaccurate (>±2°F). 21. Employee Personal Items, Employee Changing Room, Sleeping Quarters CURFFL 114135, 114175 Major Violations: Living/sleeping quarters within the establishment. Example: Bedding obsetwed Minor Violations: Employee clothing/personal bclongings stored outside designated areas. Improper storage of employee personal food in refrigerators. Changiug room cluttered or unclean. Changing room has been converted to another usc. 22. Equipment/Utensils; Storage, Cleanliness, Condition CURFFL 114050, 114065, 114090 Major Violations: Food held in inoperable hot/cold holding equipment. Gross accumulation of grease, filth and/or food debris on food contact surfaces. Example: Uncleanable cutting board with deep pits. Widespread disrepair of equipment and utensils. 23 23. Minor Violations: Utensils/equipment in disrepair. Examples: Wrapping utensil handles with cloth, string or tape Broke~crackcd handles on utensils Using a cup without a handle to dispense bulk food A cracked sink Chipped dishes and glassware Rusty shelving Missing refrigerator handle Inoperable ice machine Missing fan guards in refrigerators Unclean utensils/equipment Dirty utensils commingled with cleau utensils Missing/dirty/moldy fan guard m refrigerators Dirty food storage containers Moldy refrigerator gaskets Floor sink soiled w/th food dcbris Dirty handwashing sink Lining shelves with cardboard or aluminum fbil Icc buildup in the walk-in refrigerator/fi'eezer Pots/pans stored directly on the floor Utensils stored in a hand sink or mop sink. Violations involving the design/approval, storage, operatio~ffinstallation of equipment/utensils used ti>r serving, preparation, storage, transpo~xation or display of food. Examples: Unapproved faucet exteusion al the three-compartment sink Using milk crates as shelving and/or for storing ntensils or food Knives stored in an unapproved location or holder such as a wood block Three-compa~-iment sink too small to handle largest utensil Using unapproved utensils/cutting boards Using eqnipment that is not ANSI certified Floors/Walls/Ceiling Clean and In Good Repair and Vermin Exclusion CURFFL 114145, 114150, 114155, 114050 Major Violatinns: Violations that may result in the contamination/adulteration of_tbod, involving walls, ceilings and floors, including lhose inside a walk-in rel?igerator. 24 Examples: Peeling paint/plaster on walls or ceilings Missing/deteriorated ceiling surfaces as a result of active water intrusion Gross accumulation of mold, grease, aod/or ill'th on walls, ceilings and/or floors Damaged walls such as gaps/holcs in walls Minor Violations: Violations that are not extensive or violations that involve the possible entrance of vermin, including rodents and insects. Examples: De-activated air curtain Inadequate air curtain to prevent the entrance of flies Pass-thru window left open A gap under the door greater than ~/:~ inch A produce stand that has more than one side open to the outside air during business hours Cciling panels soiled with accumulated dust/grease Make-up air vent/ceiling vcnt accumulated with grease Decomposed food products/grease buildup on floors Missing base coving or floor tiles, missing or deteriorated grout between floor tiles or carpet on floors in unapproved areas goose FRP or metal flashing Cardboard used on the floor Rusty ceiling in walk-in cooler 24. Adequate Lighting and Shatter Guards CURFFL 114170 Major Violations: Inoperable/missing light itl walk-in refrigcratofffreezcfffood preparation/ utensil washing area. Inadequate lighting in food preparation and utensil washiog areas Missing light shields or nonshattcrproof bulbs. Mioor Violations: End caps missing lo light fixtures. Shields accumulated with dust/grease and dead iusects. Inadequate lighting. 25 25. Exhaust System Clean and In Good Repair CURFFL 114050, 114140 Major Violations: Nonfimctional exhaust hood. hnproper hood type or absence of'hood. Example: Type Ii hood above the deep fryer instead of Type l Reasonable comfort is not being met for the employees. Multiple filters are missing. ,Minor Violations: Hood lacks minimum 6" overhang over equipment. Hood, although operable, is not on during cooking. Hood not functioning adequately. Venlilation hood not maintained clean. 26. Restrooms Clean and In Good Repair CURFFL 114105, 114140 and S.B.C.C. Section 33.048 Major Violations: No operable toilets available l'or employee usc. Urinals inoperable, toilet improperly secured, leaking at ihe base or cracked. A required second rcstroom has been permanently removed/converted. Alcohol being served without thc two required rcstrooms. Lack of warm wateffsoap/paper towels/toilet tissue. No public restrooms accessible when required. Mioor Violations: Unclean restroorn facilities. Lack of approved dispensers. Inoperable ceiling Ihn in rcstroom. No ventilation in the restroom. Restroom door is not sel£-closing. A required second rcstroom is temporarily out of service. 27. Chemical Use/Storage, Janitorial Closet, Mop Sink, Waste Disposal CURFFL 114025, 114035, 114165 Major Violations: Improper storage or use ol'pesticidcs, insecticides, rodenticidcs, or nonl'ood 26 chemicals that pose a high risk to public health. Examples: Open container of bleach/sanitizcr above a ibod preparation area Automatic insecticide spray dispenser in a food or utensil area An unapproved insecticide used in tile food establishment. Chemicals stored in a food container (chemical mistakcn for tUod product). Using an unapproved food equipment lubricant. Minor Violations: hnproper storage of pesticides or chemicals that pose a low risk to public health. An unapproved insect electrocution device found within an open }hod or utensil area. Unlabeled spray bottle in the kitchen. An unapprovcd pesticide found in the janitorial closet. Exterior refuse/grease containcr lids left open or missing. Rcfi~se containers encn~sted with waste. Leaking/overflowing refuse containers. Janitorial sink in disrepair and/or has an accumulation of filth. Trash not bagged and tied prior to being disposed. Broom stored in food preparation area, mop bucket in food area. 28. Proper Signs/Exclusion of Live Animals CURFFL 114021, 114045, 113946 Ma,lot Violations: Animals observed in tile establishment, with tile exception of service Minor Violations Failure to post thc health permit and/or any of thc tk)llowing signs: hand washing sign. no smoking sign, oyster warning sign, and the letter grade. Examples: Failure tn post the establishment's health permit in a conspicuous place. Lack of a written warning sign tbr tile consumption of raxv oysters harvested fi-om tile Gulf o f Mcxico. As a general rule for afl minor violations: Repeated same minor violations may be written up as major violations at the next routine inspection. 27 www.sbcounty, gov/de hs County of San Bernardino -- Human Services System DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES FOOD PROGRAM FOOD FACILITY SELF-INSPECTION CHECKLIST The items listed in this checklist are the major areas our Division will be looking at when we perform our routine food facility inspections. This checklist is provided so that you may perform periodic reviews of your facility's operation. We suggest that you go through this c ' " , · heckhst, and check off' those items that are in compliance. Those not checked would be considered a "violation" during our inspection, and need to be corrected. We hope this checklist assists you in maintaining your facility at the highest standards. FOOD [] 1. Food is purchased from an approved source (licensed by the county, state, or federal government). [] 2. Food is inspected and found to be free from contamination, adulteration, and spoilage. [] 3. Unpackaged foods which have been served or returned from the dining area are discarded. [] 4. All foods are stored a minimum of 6" offthe floor. [] 5. Restrooms are not used for the storage of food, equipment, or supplies. [] 6. All paper products are stored in a manner so as to protect them from contamination. [] 7. Food, and food related products, are being protected from dirt, unnecessary handling, overhead leakage, and other forms of contamination. [] 8. Ail food storage containers have tight fitting lids and are properly labeled. [] 9. Foods are dispensed in the self-serve area in an approved manner. [] 10. The use ofsulfites is prohibited. [] 11. Food products are labeled in an approved manner. [] 12. Food products with an alcohol content exceeding 0.5% are properly labeled. [] 13. Shellfish tags kept for 90 days; warning signs posted. TEMPERATURE CONTROL [] 1. Potentially hazardous foods are maintained below 4 l°F or above 135°F at all times. [] 2. A thermometer, accurate to + or -2°F, is provided either as an integral part of the refrigerator and freezer (dial outs/de), or is located inside each unit at its warmest point, readily xzlclhle [] 3. An accurate metal probe thermometer, suitable for measuring food temperatures, is readily available and is being used to check food temperatures daily. [] 4. Food products are thawed in one of the following methods only: a) in refrigeration units; b) under cold running, potable water of sufficient velocity to flush loose food particles; c) in a microwave oven; d) as part of the cooking process. [] 5. Frozen food is maintained in a frozen state. [] 6. Thawed food items are not reli-ozen. Cooked or processed foods may be refrozen. [] 7. Rapid cooling and reheating procedures used for all perishable food~. PERSONNEL [] 1. All employees handling food or utensils have obtained their Food Worker's Certification. 2. Employees wash their hands with soap and warm water for the following reasons: a) before starting work; b) immediately after using the restroom; c) any time needed to prevent food contamination. [] 3. Employees handling food or utensils have no open sores, and are not sick. [] 4. Employees are wearing clean outer garments. [] 5. Tongs or other implernents are used for serving food products. [] 6. Hair of employees is properly coafined. [] 7. Employees do not smoke or use tobacco inside the facility. WATER AND SEWAGE [] I. All sinks are fully operable with hot and cold water at each faucet. [] 2. All sinks drain properly. Floor drains and floor sinks are in good working order. [] 3. Plumbing is in good repair. [] 4. Grease traps and septic tanks are routinely serviced. EQUIPMENT [] I. All equipment (i.e. stoves, grills, refrigerators, tables, sinks, etc.) is clean and well maintained; food contact surfaces are properly washed and sanitized. [] 2. Inoperable equipment has been repaired or replaced (removed from the facility). [] 3. Equipment is NSF (National Sanitation Foundation) or equivalent. [] 4. No equipment has been replaced, moved, or added without prior approval from the local environmental health department. UTENSILS [] 1. Multiservice utensils are being washed by one of the following means only: a) handwashing in a three compartment sink (wash-rinse-sanitize); b) chemical sanitizing (dishmachine) conforming to NSF stds.; c) dishwasher rinse water reaches at least 180°F for 30 seconds. [] 2. Testing materials to adequately test sanitizing methods are readily available. [] 3. All utensils are clean and well maintained. [] 4. Damaged or unapproved utensils have been repaired or replaced. [] 5. Utensils are properly protected during storage. FLOORS / WALLS / CEILINGS [] 1. FIo6rs are clean, well maintained and in good repair. [] 2. Walls, ceilings and windows are clean, well maintained and in good repair. TOILET / DRESSING ROOM / HANDWASHING SINKS [] 1. Toilet facilities are clean, well maintained and in good repair. [] 2. Self-closing doors in toilet and dressing rooms are working properly. [] 3. Single service soap and towel dispensers for all handwash sinks are operable and full. [] 4. Toilet tissue dispensers are full. [] 5. Legible handwashing signs are properly posted. [] 6. Ventilation is provided in each restroom and is in proper working order. LIGHT AND VENTILATION [] 1. Adequate lighting and ventilation is provided tlu-oughout the facility. [] 2. Exhaust ventilation filters are clean and well maintained. [] 3. Light fixtures have approved safety covers. PEST CONTROL [] 1. Facility is free from insect and rodent infestations. [] 2. Live animals, birds, or fowl are not located in the facility. [] 3. Outside doors and screen doors are self-closing and closures are in working order. [] 4. Air cur[ains are operating properly. [] 5. Only approved pesticides are used and stored in the proper manner. REFUSE [] 1. Trash containers are leak-proof and covered. 2. Plastic bags are tied before placing in refuse containers. [] 3. Outside trash bin lids are closed. [] 4. Ontside premises and refuse areas are clean and well maintained. OPERATION 1. Hazardous substances (example: chemicals, cleaning supplies, etc.) are properly labeled and stored away from food products. [] 2. No smoking and first aid signs (choking) are properly posted. [] 3. Cleaning equipment and soiled linens are properly stored. [] 4. Returned, damaged, or unlabeled food products are properly stored. Famhty has a current Environmental Health Permit to operate. THE FOLLOWING CONDITION(S) ARE SERIOUS. YOUR FACILITYMUST CLOSE UNTIL THEY ARE ABATED. [] 1. Overflowing sewage (inside or outside) [] 2. Nopotable water [] 3. No hot water [] 4. No electricity [] 5. Severe rodent or insect infestation [] 6. Actual or potential threat to the public health and safety (foods out or temperature, inadequate sanitization, etc.) QUESTIONS? Contact the nearest Environmental Health office in your area and ask to speak to your Environmental Health Specialist or visit our web site at www. sbeounty, gov/dehs. Operator's Inspection Notes 510062 FOOD FACILITY CHECKLIST 30 January 2004 Environmental Health District Office Directory Regional Offices !1647 E Holt Ave Ontario, CA ;(909) 458-9673 . Fax: (909) 458-9682 Mountain 385 N. Arrowhead 12r~ Floor ',San Bemardino, CA 92415 i(909) 387-0214 385 N. Arrowhead 2'~ Floor San Bernardino, CA 92415 i(909) 387-3047 1385 N. Arrowhead i 2''~ Floor iSan Bemardino, CA 92415 i(909) 387-4608 Fax: (909_) 387-4323 ~ax: ~909)~387-4323 High Desert 13911 Park Ave. Suite 200 Victorvllle, CA 92392 ~, (760) 243-3773 i F _a x_..._( 7_.6_ _0)_2_4__5:~2 2. _5 ...................................... ...................... ~_utl~ _y_ing Offices ' Redlands ?22 Brookside ~ Redlands, CA 92373 (909) 798-8526 I Fax: (90~9) 798-8485 jTwin Peaks 26010 State Highway189 Twin Peaks, CA 92391 ! Barstow 311 E. Mountain View ! Barstow, CA 92311 i(909) 336-0671 I(760) 256-4736 i t Fax' (760~ 256-4735 After Hours Emergency Contact Emergency Communication Center !(909) 356-3805 iTh~s number is to be used to report and obtain assistance during after hours emergencies such i as: establishment fires, power or water outages, sewer overflow or outbreaks of foodborne lillness, reopening inspection following closures by DEHS or other serious problems that may ;i._m_p~act~:~.u~blic h_e_a_lth and~safe~. _ Agency Referral List TYPE OF COMPLAINT __ AGENCY TELEPHONE U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) (800) 535.4555 California Department of Health Service~ Food and Drug Branch (FDB) (800) 495-3232 __ U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) (213) 894-2489 ~ish FDB (800) 49~-3232 :A FDA (714) 667-7416 USDA -- (800) 5354555 CalifomiaDepartmentofFoodandAgdculture(CDFA)~ (909)923-9929 FDA -- (714) 667-7416 FDA -- (714) 667-7416 __ California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) (909)597-9823 FDB -- (800) 495-3232 FDB USDA {800) 495-3232 -- . - (800) 535~.555 USDA (800) 535-4555 FDB ~ (800) 495-3232 FDA -- (714) 667-7416 AgdculturaJ Commissioner (562) 940-7803 FDB (800) 495-3232 USDA (800) 5354555 FDB (800) 495-3232 CDFA _ ~ (909) 923-9929 I[ Local Health Dept, {See Environmental Health Directory for information Refer to District ~ Office Director/ FDA (800) 688~1889 CDFA (909) 923-9929 FOB (800) 495-3232 FOB ~ (800) 495.3232 FDB (800) 495-3232 FDB ~ (80C , 495-3232 BURRITOS (Packaged- meat or poultry) (Packaged- without meat) CANNED FOODS: (Fruit, vegetable and fl - packed in CA) Fruit, vegetable and fish - not pa~ked in CA Meat or poultry products DAIRy FOOD6: (Produced in CA) Produced out-of-state FISH: Canned out-of-state FISH: Fresh, caught locally FOOD REGISTRATION State registration-wholesale/manufacturing FOOD TAMPERING Meat FROZEN DtNNERS: Meat or poultry) Seafood (processed in CA) Seafood (processed out-of-state) FRUIT, fresh: (Quarantine pest exctus~n) PesticJde Enforcement LICENSES: Boffiing water, Canhing food, Cold storage, Frozen food lockers, Water) MEAT AND POULTRY; ORGANIC FOOD OUT-OF-DATE FOODS: Dairy (only) Other expired feeds POPSICLES: Produced out-of-state Produced in CA SANDWICHES (Fresh packaged) VENDING MACHINES Water WATER: Bottled (imported and out-of-state) Vended Web sites: 32 California Uniform Retail Food Facilities Law Food and Drug Administration Government Food Safety Information U.S. Dept. of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Food and Drug Branch California Dept. of Health Services http://www, dhs.cahwnet.govd http://www, fda.gov/ h--~-'//www, foodsa fety. gov_/ hR~E2'//www=fsis.usda, go v_/ http://www, dhs.ca.gov/£db/ Booklet Request Form The Retail Food Inspection Guide is available in print. To order booklets, please complete and mail this form. A nominal fee may be charged for copies. Contact the regional office nearest you for further information. County of San Bemardino · Department of Public Health Division of Envir6mnental Health Services 385 North Arrowhead Avenue, 2nd Floor San Bemardino, CA 92415-0160 Date of Order Telephone Number Send to (Name) Street Address City State Zip Code Booklet San Bernardino County Retail Food Inspection Guide* Quantity * A nominal fee may be charged for additional copies. Contact the Department of Environmental Health nfflceq at The California Health and Safety Code may be found on the world wide web at: http://www, legin fo.ca.gov/calaw, htral The Division of Environmental Health Services may be found on the world wide web at: http://ww~v, sbcou nty. gov/dehs R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A COMMUNITY SERVICES Saaff Repor DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: April 6, 2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REVISING REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO POSSESSION AND CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES WITHIN CITY PARKS, AND AMENDING TITLE 12 OF THE RANCHO · CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Ordinance revising regulations pertaining to possession and consumption of alcoholic beverages within City parks and amending title 12 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. BACKGROUND At the City Council meeting on Mamh 16, 2005, the Council approved first reading of the attached Ordinance that would permit the serving of alcoholic beverages in the Senior and Community Center at Central Park, in accordance with approved policies and procedures. At the same meeting, the City Council reviewed and discussed the proposed policies with the result of directing staff to make modifications to the policies relating to the use of caterers for serving alcohol. The proposed modified policies and procedures will be considered at the April 6th Council meeting under a separate agenda item. The required Ordinance is attached for consideration by the City Council and staff recommends approval of second reading. Respe Kevin Comm cArdle mity Services Director Attachments ORDINANC NO. I AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REVISING REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO POSSESSION AND CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES WITHIN CITY PARKS, AND AMENDING TITLE 12 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby ordains as follows: SECTION 1: Subsection "B" of Section 12.04.010 of Chapter 12.04 of Title 12 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "B.1. Possess an open container of an alcoholic beverage or consume any alcoholic beverage, except as follows: Beer and wine that is sold within the interior of the stadium building located in the sports complex on the west side of Rochester Avenue, south of Foothill Boulevard. In the following areas of the James L. Brulte Senior Center and Goldy S. Lewis Community Center in Central Park: the David Dreier Hall, the Rancho Cucamonga Hall, the Mesa Courtyard, and in any lobby and patio area immediately adjacent to these areas, during City-permitted or operated functions, so long as City-required insurance and secudty is provided, and, if required by State law, an ABC liquor license is first obtained and proof thereof provided to the City. Within any other areas in City parks specifically permitted City Council resolution, or otherwise by law. 2. The City Manager shall cause signs to be posted as follows: Subject to the previsions of subsections b and c, below, at each entrance to each City park, a sign substantially stating, as follows: 'Possession or consumption of alcoholic beverages in City parks is prohibited - R.C.M.C. §12.04.010' Ordinance No. Page 2 of 3 At the entrance to the Sports Complex located on the west side of Rochester Avenue, south of Foothill Boulevard, a sign substantially stating, as follows: 'Except for the possession or consumption of beer or wine sold within the stadium building located on these premises, possession or consumption of alcoholic beverages in City parks is prohibited - R.C.M.C. {}12.04.010' c. At the entrance to Central Park, a sign substantially stating, as follows: 'Possession or consumption of alcoholic beverages is prohibited in this park except where posted otherwise within the James L. Brulte Senior Center and Goldy S. Lewis Community Center- R.C.M.C. §12.04.010' For the purpose of this Chapter, the term 'alcoholic beverage' or 'alcoholic beverages' shall have the meaning set forth in Section 23044 of the California Business and Professions Code, or any successor provision thereto. The term 'open container of an alcoholic beverage' shall mean any can, bottle or other receptacle containing any alcoholic beverage that has been opened, or a seal broken, or the contents of which have been partially removed." SECTION 2: Penalties. Any person, firm, partnership or corporation violating any provision of this Ordinance or the Section hereby adopted, or failing to comply with any of the requirements thereof, is guilty of an infraction, and upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by a fine not exceeding one hundred dollars ($100) for a first violation; by a fine not exceeding two hundred dollars ($200) for a second violation of the same provision within one (1) year; and by a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars ($500) for each additional violation of the same provision within one (1) year. SECTION 3: Severabilit-y. The City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance or the Section hereby adopted be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences and words of this Ordinance and said Section shall remain in full force and effect. Ordinance No. Page 3 of 3 SECTION 4: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published in the manner prescribed by law. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: day of ,2005. William J. Alexander, Mayor ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a Regular Meeting of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of 2005, and was passed at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of ,2005. Executed this __ day of 2005, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk hlCOMMSERV~CENTRAL PARK PROJECT~4iscellaneoustAIcoholOtciinance. O31605. doc T H E C I T Y 0 F SlaffReport DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: April 6, 2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Brad Buller, City Planner UPDATE REGARDING 210 FREEWAY LANDSCAPING GENERAL: The landscape plan preparation for Segments 3 and 4, located between the western City limits and Rochester Avenue, is being performed by Caltrans, and therefore, the schedule remains tentative in accordance with the submittal of their plans/final bid package to SANBAG. SANBAG has informed us that they have recently selected a construction management firm to oversee the construction of Segments 1, 2, 3, and 4 for the Upland and Rancho Cucamonga Sections. Caltrans has indicated that the Segments 3 and 4 landscape planting plan is neady complete. They anticipate meeting with the City upon completion of their plan for City comment, most likely in mid-April. Caltrans expects completion of their bid package within 3-4 months following their receipt of final comments from the City. Following the award of the contract, it is anticipated that the construction/installation will take approximately 6-9 months with a plant establishment period of about 3 years. Respec~ully submitted, City Planner BB:Is R A N C H O C U C A M COMMUNITY SERVICES DATE: April 6, 2005 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: ONGA Mayorand Members ofthe City Council Jack Lam, AICP, CityManager Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director APPROVAL OF POLICIES AND PROCEDURES GOVERNING THE SERVING OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES BY FACILITY RENTAL GROUPS IN THE SENIOR AND COMMUNITY CENTER AT CENTRAL PARK RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council approve the attached policies and procedures governing the serving of alcoholic beverages (beer, wine and champagne) in the Central Park Senior and Community Center. BACKGROUND~ANALYSIS At the City Council meeting on March 16, 2005, the Council reviewed an agenda item to reconsider approval of policies and procedures governing the serving of beer, wine and champagne by facility rental groups at the new Central Park Senior and Community Center. As part of that agenda item, staff presented a revised set of recommended policies and procedures that would govern the serving of alcoholic beverages, if approved by the City Council. The revisions to the policies and procedures related to the tightening up of regulations regarding security and approval of rental groups, as well as some general clarifications of policy. During the March 16m City Council discussion, Council members suggested including an additional policy item that would require a rental group serving alcohol to use a pre- approved, alcohol-licensed caterer to serve their food and beverages. Staff was directed to prepare such a policy recommendation for consideration by the Council at the April 6m meeting. The consideration of the proposed policies and procedures were continued to this next meeting. Staff has included recommendations #14-15 within the proposed policies and procedures, which would require rental groups serving alcohol to use a licensed caterer for their food and beverages. The proposed additional language defines the process for approving caterers which would be permitted for these functions. CITY COUNCIL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES REGARDING ALCOHOL USE AT CENTRAL PARK Apdl 6, 2005 Page 2 Throughout the revised policies and procedures, staff has made some minor clean-up modifications to the wording defining the various rooms and facilities. tted, Community Services Director Attachment: Alcohol Beverage Use Policy hltCOUNClL&BOARDStClTYCOUNCIL[STAFFREPORTSI2OO4~ALCOHOLPOLICY. 040605 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT ALCOHOL BEVERAGE USE POLICY RANCHO CU~CAMONGA ~_~ALIFORNIA POLICY NO,: 500-45 PAGE: 1 of 5 EFFECTIVE: August 16, 2001 REVISED: April 6, 2005 APPROVgD; SUBJECT: SERVING OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AT THE GOLDY S. LEWIS COMMUNITY CENTER, THE JAMES L. BRULTE SENIOR CENTER, THE MESA COURTYARD AT CENTRAL PARK, RANCHO CUCAMONGA SENIOR CENTER, CIVIC CENTER COURT YARD AND CHAFFEY- GARClA HOUSE PURPOSE: To specify guidelines and parameters that ensure a safe and orderly use of alcohol at the designated facilities. POLICY: The following procedures will be followed in the serving of alcoholic beverages by all users and guests of the Goldy S. Lewis Community Center, the James L. Brulte Senior Center, The Mesa Courtyard at Central Park (these three facilities referred to hereafter as "Central Park Senior/Community Center"), Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center, Civic Center Court Yard and Chaffey-Garcia House. GENERAL POLICIES AND GUIDELINES: The City of Rancho Cucamonga is interested in meeting the needs of the community in their use of designated facilities by allowing the consumption and sale of alcoholic beverages at approved functions under strict conditions. It is the intent of the City to authorize the serving of alcoholic beverages within designated facilities as long as strict measures are adhered to in order to ensure that these functions remain safe and orderly. Groups or individuals wishing to serve alcoholic beverages must submit an application for permit to use the Central Park SeniodCommunity Center, Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center, Civic Center Court Yard or Chaffey- Garcia House at least 60 days prior to the event. Any applicant permitted to serve alcoholic beverages will be required to pay a $50.00 administrative fee. A supplementary damage/security deposit of $500.00, in addition to the security deposit for rental of the facility, will ~lso be required for all events at which alcohol will be served. For the purpose of this policy the term "alcoholic beverage" or "alcoholic beverages" shall be defined as beer, wine, and/or champagne only. The City reserves the right to place restrictions on the use of alcoholic beverages in accordance with State/Federal Law and City Ordinances. Failure to comply with any regulations will result in the immediate revocation of permission to use alcohol. ALCOHOL BEVERAGE USE POLICY PAGE 2 Any function where alcoholic beverages are to be served will require a minimum of one-uniformed Deputy Sheriff/Reserve or private security for four hours, at a rate equal to their actual cost plus benefits per hour. This. determination will be made by the Recreation Supervisor, in coordination with the Police Department. Private Security is identified as a state licensed Security Company by the Department of Consumer Affairs. Private security officers will not be armed. In addition to the uniformed Deputy Sheriff/Reserve or unarmed Private Security officers; trained staff will be assigned to monitor any area(s) serving alcoholic beverages. The number of staff monitoring these areas will be adjusted depending on how many guests will be attending the function. The additional security and staff fees will be the responsibility of the renter of the facility. At the discretion of the Recreation Supervisor (Central Park Senior/ Community Center, Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center or Civic Center Court Yard) or the Etiwanda Historical Society Board of Directors (Chaffey-Gamia House) and/or the Sheriff's Department, small groups will require Private Security, larger groups may require one or more uniformed Deputy Sheriffs/Reserve or Private Security depending on the potential risk associated with the specific use. All applications for alcohol use will be reviewed by those City staff and the Sheriffs Department on an individual basis to determine the risk level presented by the functions and activities to be held during the proposed rental. All alcoholic beverages must be sold, served and consumed inside the room scheduled by that particular party including only the Rancho Cucamonga Hall, David Dreier Hall, or Mesa Courtyard at the Central Park Senior/Community Center, only the Mission or Zinfandel Rooms at the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center, in conjunction with rental of one or both of these facilities. Alcohol possession or consumption is strictly prohibited in the patio, hallways, restrooms, parking lots, other rooms, etc. Alcohol use at the Civic Center Court Yard is to remain within the Court Yard and not to expand out of the immediate Court Yard, such as the parking lot, Civic Center walkways or inside the Civic Center building. Alcohol use at the Chaffey-Garcia House shall be limited to the fenced in seating area and the patio area and not to expand out of that area such as the parking lot. At every rental function at which alcohol will be served at the Central Park Senior/Community Center, staff shall place a sign in a location visible to the public that the alcoholic beverages are being served by a private renter, not by the City. For rental functions where there is a guest(s) of honor, each of those guest(s) of honor must be at least 21 years of age for consumption of alcoholic beverages to be permitted. No alcoholic beverages shall be served to any person or served by any_~ person less than 21 years of age. 5 ALCOHOL BEVERAGE USE POLICY PAGE 3 Only beer, wine and/or champagne are permitted to be sold or consumed. All drinks must be consumed from individual clear containers. There will be no drinking directly from bottles or cans. Champagne bottles must be opened only in the kitchen (Central Park Senior/Community Center, Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center and Chaffey-Garcia House) or at a designated serving table (Civic Center Court Yard and Chaffey-Garcia House). 10. In the Central Park Senior/Community Center, permission for consumption of alcoholic beverages shall be limited to Friday evenings, Saturdays/Sundays and holidays only. Alcoholic beverage functions may be approved during other times for City-sponsored activities or Rancho Cucamonga based non- profit organizations by the Community Services Director if it is determined that there is no scheduling overlap with any youth activities within the facility. 11. Serving and/or selling of alcoholic beverages may be allowed for a maximum of four (4) hours. Serving of any alcoholic beverages must end one hour before the scheduled close of the event. 12. The applicant shall remove all such alcoholic beverages and empty containers from the premises immediately following the approved function. 13. Failure to abide by the above policies will result in forfeiture of a portion or all of the required cleaning/security deposits. 14. At the Central Park Senior/Community Center, all applicants serving alcoholic beverages must contract with a pre-approved caterer to provide all food and bar service for the duration of the event. A City established list of pre-approved vendors will be available to applicants. 15. Requirements necessary for a caterer to become a pre-approved vendor will include the following: ae Evidence of current required permits, licenses, certificates and insurance. Demonstrated prior successful experience providing food, catering and serving of alcoholic beverages in large public facilities. c. Regular and positive reference checks by staff from other organizations, cities, clients, and security officials. d. Successful completion of a Central Park Senior/Community Center Facility Regulations and Kitchen Use Training Program. Caterers will be evaluated on a continual basis concerning their ability to meet the Community Services Caterer Guidelines, including requirements for cleanliness, completion of essential paperwork (i.e. licenses, certificates and insurance), adherence to requirements of the Alcohol Beverage Control Commission, ALCOHOL BEVERAGE USE POLICY PAGE 4 strong enforcement of alcohol serving requirements, effective communication, care of the facility, quality of vendors' staff, working relationship with other vendors/staff and quality of equipment. fw The Community Services Department reserves the right to regularly update the pre-approved vendors' list. 16. The distribution or consumption of alcoholic beverages shall be in compliance with applicable laws, including regulations of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Commission. All caterers using the Central Park Senior/Community Center, Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center, Civic Center Court Yard, or the Chaffey- Gamia House shall be solely responsible for obtaining all required permits or licenses relating to the distribution and consumption of alcoholic beverages on the premises. Evidence of required permits, licenses, certificates or insurance must be provided to the Recreation Supervisor or the board representative of the Etiwanda Historical Society Board of Directors (Chaffey- Garcia House) ten working days prior to the scheduled event. No sales or requests for donations for alcoholic beverages are permitted without a license from the State Alcoholic Beverage Control Department. 17. Permit requirements for serving alcoholic beverages are as follows: A. If alcoholic beverages are served at a function without charge, a permit from the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control is NOT necessary. B. If beer, wine or champagne is sold at a function or if there is a charge to attend the function the applicant must obtain a temporary beer permit or a temporary wine (champagne) permit from the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control. For the purposes of this policy, "sold" alcoholic beverages is defined as drinks that a person paid for by the use of money, admission price, tickets, or any other "token" of value. 18. To obtain a one-day alcoholic beverage permit from the ABC: A. The applicant shall apply in person to the State Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control. The request for the permit must be accompanied by a letter/contract from the City of Rancho Cucamonga Police Department approving the serving of alcohol beverages. Applicant must have submitted the Building Request form to a representative of the Rancho Cucamonga Community Services Department or the Chaffey-Garcia House and insured the availability of the facility prior to receiving a letter/contract from the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department addressed to the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control requesting an alcoholic beverage permit. ALCOHOL BEVERAGE USE POLICY PAGE 5 19. One-day permits to sell and serve alcoholic beverages may be obtained by non-profit organizations at the following location: Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control 3737 Main Street, Suite 900 Riverside, CA 92501 (909) 782-4400 Once the City Alcohol Use Application and Building Request have been approved, applicant must provide a certificate of insurance (liability) for the amount of one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) or more listing the City of Rancho Cucamonga as additionally insured. T H E C I T Y O F l~A N Cfi 0 C U CAM 0 N GA DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: April 6, 2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst III CONSIDERATION OF A PROPOSAL FROM CONSULTANT NATHAN WINOGRAD FOR AN ASSESSMENT OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA ANIMAL SHELTER AND PREPARATION OF A "NO- KILL BLUEPRINT" FOR THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council review and discuss a proposal from consultant Nathan Winograd for an assessment of the Rancho Cucamonga Animal Shelter and preparation of a "No-Kill Blueprint" for the Rancho Cucamonga community and provide direction to staff regarding the preparation of a contract with the consultant for those services. Back.qround At the February 16, 2005, meeting of the City Council, the Council directed City staff to solicit cost estimates and proposals from professional consultants to advise the City regarding the feasibility of establishing a No-Kill animal shelter program at the Rancho Cucamonga Animal Shelter. City staff was able to identify just one provider to perform a consultation specifically focused on No-Kill policies and programs for municipal animal shelters--Nathan Winograd of "No-Kill Solutions." On March 14, the City Council received a presentation from Mr. Winograd regarding his experiences implementing No-Kill animal shelter programs at the San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (SPCA) and the Tompkins County, New York SPCA. At that time the City Council requested that Mr. Winograd prepare a proposal for the City's consideration. City staff provided Mr. Winograd with a scope of services defining our expectations of what the feasibility study would include. The scope of services stated that, in general and at a minimum, the City is seeking a consultant to provide the following: · Define the term "No-Kill" as it relates to the operation of a municipal, open- access Shelter and define all related terms such as "healthy and treatable," "feral," "adoptable," and "limited access." April 6, 2005 Staff Repod: Consideration of a Proposal from Consultant Nathan Winograd for an Assessment of the Rancho Cucamonga Animal Shelter and Preparation of a "No-Kill Blueprint" for the Rancho Cucamonga Animal Shelter Page 2 of 3 · Review current operations of the Rancho Cucamonga Animal Shelter, including existing policies, procedures, services, and programs. As the focus of this study is No-Kill, the research shall be similarly focused on those services and programs currently utilized in seeking high adoption rates and Iow euthanasia rates at the Shelter. · Provide an assessment to the City regarding the effectiveness of the above. · Reseamh local community contacts such as animal advocacy groups, veterinarians, and volunteers and provide the City with an assessment of the effectiveness of and potential for local support for a No-Kill Animal Shelter. · Provide an objective and thorough analysis of the feasibility of the Rancho Cucamonga Animal Shelter operating as a No-Kill Shelter. This analysis shall include, but not be limited to, the following: o Specific definition of No-Kill as it would relate to the City referring to the Rancho Cucamonga Animal Shelter as "No-Kill," including the expected outcomes and goals as well as the measurements used to gauge effectiveness and success. o Identification of all revisions and additions to existinq policies, procedures, and proqrams that would be required in order to achieve a No-Kill Rancho Cucamonga Animal Shelter. This shall include an assessment of the level of community support from local veterinarians, rescue groups, volunteers, etc., necessary to achieve and sustain a No-kill program. o Levels of service vs. cost: Identification of the fiscal requirements necessary to achieve and sustain a No-Kill Animal Shelter in Rancho Cucamonga in accordance with the definition provided above. The analysis shall identify long-term financial requirements in addition to any "start-up" or immediate costs. If the recommendations include grant funding or any one- time financial opportunities, the analysis shall identify and address funding requirements for the future beyond grants. Aisc identify realistic opportunities for long-term grant or foundation funding. o Proposed timeline for implementation of a plan to achieve a No-Kill status at the Animal Shelter, if feasible. For example, would any implementation process be completed in phases or may steps be taken for immediate implementation? The City received Mr. Winograd's proposal (attached) on March 29. The proposal indicates that the consultant will provide to the City an "assessment and plan" that will address all of the items included in our scope of services, with a primary focus on the following: · Animal care and handling April 6, 2005 Staff Report: Consideration of a Proposal from Consultant Nathan Winograd for an Assessment of the Rancho Cucamonga Animal Shelter and Preparation of a "No-Kill Blueprint" for the Rancho Cucamonga Animal Shelter Page 3 of 3 · Service priorities · Establishing public and private cooperation · Engaging the community · Achieving No-Kill in a cost-effective manner · Meeting with community partners and stakeholders including rescue groups, the veterinary community and others A more detailed listing of the elements of the assessment is included in the "Scope of Assessment & Blueprint" section of the proposal. Mr. Winograd's assessment would include a review of written documents and materials such as Shelter policies and procedures, a 10-day onsite evaluation including inspection of the facility and meeting with stakeholders in the community, soliciting public comments, presentation of the report, and follow up as needed. The proposed final product will be a bound written report and presentation to the City regarding the Shelter assessment and No-Kill plan. The proposed fee for the assessment is $12,000 plus expenses capped at a maximum of $2,000. The proposal indicates that the timeline for the assessment will be approximately four months, and no more than six months, from the date a contract is executed. Mr. Winograd has estimated that he would be available to commence the assessment process in June, which would indicate that a final report would be presented to the City in September. As of March 31, City staff has been successful in communicating with only two of the references provided by the consultant with regard to .his employment experiences at animal shelters. As an independent consultant, Mr. Winograd has not yet completed a full assessment program for a municipal shelter, therefore we are unable to review a work sample as we would typically request a proposer to provide to the City. Staff will continue to try to complete our due diligence responsibilities regarding this proposal prior to the April 6 Council meeting. Please note that, should the City Council direct staff to prepare contract documents with Mr. Winograd for consultation services, it would be a sole source contract based upon the fact that we have been unable to identify another consultant offering these specific services. Attachments: No-Kill Blueprint Proposal with City Scope of Services and Additional Attachments Respectfully Submitted, Michelle Dawson Management Analyst III · Define the term "No-Kill" as it relates to the operation of a municipal, open- access Shelter and define all related terms such as "healthy and treatable," "feral," "adoptable," and "limited access." · Review current operations of the Rancho Cucamonga Animal Shelter, including existing policies, procedures, services, and programs. As the focus of this study is No-Kill, the research shall be similarly focused on those services and programs currently utilized in seeking high adoption rates and Iow euthanasia rates at the Shelter. · Provide an assessment to the City regarding the effectiveness of the above. · Research local community contacts such as animal advocacy groups, veterinarians, and volunteers and provide the City with an assessment of the effectiveness of and potential for local support for a No-Kill Animal Shelter. · Provide an objective and thorough analysis of the feasibility of the Rancho Cucamonga Animal Shelter operating as a No-Kill Shelter. This analysis shall include, but not be limited to, the following: o Specific definition of No-Kill as it would relate to the City referring to the Rancho Cucamonga Animal Shelter as "No-Kill," including the expected outcomes and goals as well as the measurements used to gauge effectiveness and success. o Identification of all revisions and additions to existing policies, procedures, and programs that would be required in order to achieve a No-Kill Rancho Cucamonga Animal Shelter. This shall include an assessment of the level of community support from local veterinarians, rescue groups, volunteers, etc., necessary to achieve and sustain a No- kill program. o Levels of service vs. cost: Identification of the fiscal requirements necessary to achieve and sustain a No-Kill Animal Shelter in Rancho Cucamonga in accordance with the definition provided above. The analysis shall identify long-term financial requirements in addition to any "start-up" or immediate costs. If the recommendations include grant funding or any one-time financial opportunities, the analysis shall identify and address funding requirements for the future beyond grants. Also identify realistic opportunities for long-term grant or foundation funding. o Proposed timeline for implementation of a plan to achieve a No-Kill status at the Animal Shelter, if feasible. For example, would any implementation process be completed in phases or may steps be taken for immediate implementation? Page 1 of 1 MAYOR'S E-MAIL From: ericg@kennebell.net Sent: April 6, 2005 3:54 PM To: Mayor Subject: Nathan Winograd Proposal Unfortunately, I will be unable to attend tonights meeting. I would like to urge you to vote "yes" on the proposal to hire Nathan Winograd. San Bemardino County has proven they cannot manage our shelter to our citizens standards. Our city should operate the shelter. San Bemardino County has been resistant to every change proposed. They are spending their time and energy defending outdated policies and programs. We have an opportunity to turn our shelter into a truly innovative facility. Your support to bring our animal shelter into the new "no kill" movement will be appreciated by our entire community and a model for other communities to follow. Sincerely, Eric Glenn 6656 Brissac Place Alta Loma, CA 91737 4/6/2005 Send comments to: Kim Intino, ASC Program Manager The Humane Society of the US 2100 L. Street NW Washington, DC 20037 e-mail: Kintino@hsus.org No Solutidns ·, uF R~'JCH0 CUCAN~. AOMINI.~TP ~"nr~! t~AR 29 2C~ March 23, 2005 Michelle Dawson Management Analyist ILl.~.- ' City of Rancho ~_~ga; '; 10500 Ciyiq.~enter'~r{ve .... CA 91729 Rancho'Cucamonga Thank you~!f~} g~wng me the opp(~i o p~t,this proposal for an asses~nt of Ran~.0. Cucamon( m~o~i~[shelter and to prov de a bluep,~ for helping t~C~ achiev ~ le~ill go. As I indicated in my ~ntat,on to the C,~ounci on ~, L(~, 2005>7~K~is a human~.~, ~;~'.~sta,nable, ~st~ffect~model th~ ~ hand in hand ~i~~a~ .-4;? safe~, w~,e ~ul,,ing ~ ~ ~espon~ ~o t~paye~. My wo~ i~ ~i,, County and San Francis~mvet~ ~{~ of the No Kill model and the ab~~ pnnoples. I have been ab~p ~-in" from a broad s~ctmm of ~Pie, helping to ensure its su~ss: ~Su~ I( ~tom and executives, health depa~ment officials, town government, ad,private interest groups. tf ~ p~.am masonabFe m~lr m~c~e pos,bons and ac~m~bng where ne~ssaff, we can addres~an~ a~h~e our goals m a s~ ~utual respect and cooperation. My stadin~ p6i~t'i~ to recognize tha{~&~e d fferent missions of ~nvolved agencies, we all want ~ build a be~er world fo' r'a~a~. My background, the scope of the assessment and blueprint, along with a prop&~l are enclosed. Please let me know if I could be of se~ice. I I~k fo~ard to woAid~ with you. Very truly youm, Post Office Box 19269 · San Diego, CA 92159 9.825.6219 Telephone · 619.825.6655 Fax * info@nokillsolutions.com ~, ¢~ No KILL BLUEPRINT PROPOSAL SolutiO'ns CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA March 23, 2005 No Kill Solutions P.O. Box 19269 San Diego, CA 92159 (619) 825-6219 CONTENTS & ATTACHMENTS · Letter to Michelle Dawson, Management Analyist, dated March 23, 2005 (attached) · Background & Experience · References · What Others Are Saying · Scope of Assessment & Blueprint · Proposal Background Articles about Tompkins County & San Francisco SPCA Achievements (attached) · General Information Brochure (attached) BACKGROUND & EXPERIENCE Nathan J. Winograd, the founder and director of No Kill Solutions, is a graduate of Stanford Law School, a former criminal prosecutor and corporate attorney, has helped write legislation at the state and national level, has spoken nationally and internationally on animal sheltering issues, and has consulted with a wide range of animal protection groups including some of the largest and best known in the nation. As Director of Operations for the San Francisco SPCA, Nathan J. Winograd was instrumental in advancing some of the most progressive shelter programs in the nation, and helped push the lifesaving rate to over three times the national average for an urban community and at the time, the best in the nation. He oversaw a budget of $8 million per year, supervised over 170 employees, and managed a range of programs including foster care, advocacy, adoption, animal behavior, finance, fundraising, human resources, intake, public relations, animal hospital administration and capital construction. As Executive Director of the Tompkins County SPCA, he managed the full range of animal control and adoption shelter services including capital fundraising and construction of a new Pet Adoption Center achieving unprecedented results. Despite animal control contracts which required the Tompkins County SPCA to accept all dogs and cats, during his tenure: He reduced the death rate by 75% to 1.8 animals for every 1,000 human residents, over eight times less than the national average and the lowest of any community in the United States; Tompkins County became the safest community for homeless dogs and cats in the U.S. for two years in a row (source: Animal People); and, Tompkins County became the nation's only no kill community saving 100% of healthy and treatable dogs and cats, and 100% of feral cats (93% of the animals overall). The Ithaca Journal credited Nathan J. Winograd with a complete reinvention of the organization, including: Life-Saving Programs. Nathan J. Winograd built a strong partnership with rescue groups, and created unprecedented adoption, foster, advocacy, medical, behavior and training programs that made Tompkins County the safest community in the U.S. for homeless pets; Public Relations and Marketing. He had well over 400 media stories in 2003 alone with a minimal public relations budget, creating ongoing opportunities with local and national newspapers, magazines and radio stations; Co~unit~ Support. He solidified partnerships with major retailers for highly successful offsite adoption events, ongoing promotions to support the shelter, and increased community presence; Fundraising and Develolmment. He closed a budget deficit prior to opening the new Pet Adoption Center, finished FY2002 and' FY2003 with a financial surplus, raised the average gift for three years in a row, significantly increased membership, created a major donor giving category for the first time in the organization's history, and joined with businesses and corporations including Merrill Lynch, Autodesk, M&T Bank, and others to raise millions of dollars for the shelter; · And more... As a nationally recognized speaker, Nathan J. Winograd has spoken at national animal welfare conferences from coast to coast. He has been a frequent and popular speaker at Best Friends No More Homeless Pets Conferences, the No Kill Conference, and others. He has spoken internationally as well, as a guest of the Canadian Federation of Humane Societies in Ottawa, and has been invited to speak as far away as Czechoslovakia. He has also lectured on animal sheltering ethics to students at Cornell University's College of Veterinary Medicine, the nation's number one ranked veterinary school. He has collaborated with many organizations including: Philadephia Animal Alliance for Animal Legal Ca~e & Control Assoc. Philadelphia's Animals Defense Fund Best Friends Animal Society Tompkins County SPCA Palo Alto Humane Society ASPCA San Francisco SPCA Stanford Cat Network 2¥? REFERENCES Tara Derby-Perrin, Executive Director, Philadelphia Animal Care and Control Association; Chair, Alliance for Philadelphia's Animals Philadelphia Animal Care & Control Association 111 W. Hunting Park Avenue Philadelphia, PA 19140 (215)313-3220 cell telephone www.pacca.us tara@animalalliancepa.org Jane Hoffman, President, Attorney, Mayor's Alliance for New York City's Animals Mayor's Alliance for NYC's Animals 244 Fifth Avenue #R290 New York, NY 10001 (510) 337-8989 telephone www.animalallianceny.org info@animalliancenyc.org Taimie L. Bryant, J.D., Ph.D., Professor, School of Law, University of California Los Angeles, Author and Lobbyist, 1998 Animal Shelter Law (Hayden Bill) School of Law University of California Los Angeles Box 951476 Los Angeles, CA 90095 (310) 206-3763 telephone www.law.ucla.edu bryant@law.ucla.edu David Stinson, C.P.A., Sciarabba Walker & Co, LLP, Treasurer, Board of Directors, Tompkins County SPCA Sciarabba Walker & Co., LLP 200 E. Buffalo Street #402 Ithaca, NY 14850 (607) 272-5550 telephone www.sciarabbawalker.com dms@sciarabbawalker.com WHAT OTHERS ARE SAYING "Winograd developed innovative programs that helped [San Francisco] become the first major U.S. community to end the killing of adoptable pets." --Michael Mountain, Ed., Best Friends Animal Society Best Friends, March/April 2002, p. 18. " 'In 2003, the Tompkins County SPCA saved 100% of all healthy, friendly dogs and cats, 100% of treatable sick and injured animals, and 100% of feral cats. Overall, 93% of dogs and cats were saved' .... This amazing result was accomplished by an "open-door" agency that also contracts to perform animal control. Credit for saving so many cat and dog lives rests squarely on the shoulders of the recently retired Executive Director, Nathan Winograd." --Richard Avanzino, Ed., Maddie's Fund The No Kill Nation, September 2004, p. 2. "Tompkins County's SPCA is the safest place to be a homeless dog or cat, according to a national publication that tracks euthanasia statistics..." --Dan Higgins, Staff Reporter, Ithaca Journal Ithaca Journal, January 3, 2003, p. 1. "Ithaca is leading the pack when it comes to animal protection.., thanks to ~a dynamic executive director.'" --Merritt Clifton, Ed., Animal People Ithaca Journal, January 3, 2003, p. 1. "It's impressive seeing an agency doing ten times better than the national average. Knowing that the local SPCA is doing all it can to save the lives of the dogs..." --Merritt Clifton, Ed., Animal People Ithaca Journal, January 20, 2004, p. BI. SCOPE OF ASSESSMENT & BLUEPRINT The Scope of Assessment and Blueprint for the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall include the four page document and four additional pages of statistics entitled "City of Rancho Cucamonga Scope of Work for No-Kill Animal Shelter Feasibility Consultation" provided by Michelle Dawson to Nathan J. Winograd on March 14, 2005, which is enclosed and attached to this proposal and hereby incorporated in full by reference including: · Definition of the term "No Kill" as it relates to the operation of a municipal, open-access shelter and definition of all related terms; · Review of current operations of the Rancho Cucamonga Animal Shelter; · Assessment of support by community stakeholder groups; · Analysis regarding feasibility and costs of the Rancho Cucamonga Animal Shelter operating on a No Kill basis; · Proposal of a plan including costs, timetables and policies to do so. The assessment and plan will focus primarily on animal care and handling, service priorities, establishing public and private cooperation, engaging the community, achieving No Kill in a cost-effective manner, and includes meeting with community partners and stakeholders including rescue groups, the veterinary community and others. The final product will be a bound written report and presentation to the City of Rancho Cucamonga involving both the assessment and plan. The contract is for a product, not a period of time. While every effort is made to produce results in a timely manner, there are no guarantees as to timeliness except as follows: although every effort will be made to finish the process in approximately four months from the time a contract is signed, assuming full cooperation by the City of Rancho Cucamonga or its contractee, the assessment will not exceed six months from the date of contract signing. Generally, the time frame is as follows: · Contract Signed TBD · Request for Information to Client 1 week after Contract · Receipt of Information from Client 2-3 weeks after Request · Itinerary for Site Visit 2 weeks after Receipt of Information · Site Visit 4 weeks after Receipt of Information · Report Completed 8 weeks after Completion of Site Visit · Conference Call re: Report & Next Steps 1 week after Submission · Follow-up AS Needed However, No Kill Solutions must be able to review written materials and documents, and have cooperation and support from staff and management to make the process work. Much of this material (described below) must be reviewed prior to the visit (at least four weeks in advance), and along with candor and cooperation during the site visit and any follow-up requests, is considered a necessary condition of the assessment. Scope of Assessment Shelter Operations: Hours of Operation; Telephone System; Computer Systems & Support; Record Keeping; Shelter Statistics; Incoming Animal Identification & Procedures; Lost & Found Procedures; Animal Care & Handling; Tracking. II. Veterinary & Health Issues: Disease Control and Sanitation; Isolation and Separation; Feeding Protocols; Animal Examinations & Assessment; Vaccination Protocols; Sterilization Services; Spay/Neuter; Veterinary Services. III. Adoptions: Adoption Promotion; Adoption Process & Policies; Selection Criteria; Rescue Groups; Foster Care; Accessibility. IV. Coramunity Outreach Programs: Agency Promotion; Volunteers; Education; Relations with Area Shelters & Rescue Groups; Customer Service; Website; Feral Cat Issues. PROPOSAL Assessment for City of Rancho Cucamonga and No Kill Blueprint for City of Rancho Cucamonga animal shelter according to enclosed scope of work. Costs include onsite inspection of facility, meeting with stakeholders in the community, soliciting public comments, presentation of report, and follow-up as needed. Fee: $12,000 plus expenses capped at a maximum of $2,000 (to include 10 day on-site evaluation hotel accommodations, one meal per day not to exceed $15.00, supplies including telephone, paper, film, and similar reasonable expenses). At the end of the assessment and review period, I will provide a bound written report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga involving both the assessment and plan. After the issuance of the report, No Kill Solutions is available for follow-up, providing ongoing guidance to help you meet your goals at no additional cost. If you agree in principle with this proposal, please let me know at your earliest convenience and I will send you a contract. This proposal expires at 5 pm on: June 30, 2005. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SCOPE OF WORK FOR No-KILL ANIMAL SHELTER FEASIBILITY CONSULTATION The City of Rancho Cucamonga is seeking proposals from consultants to prepare a study discussing the feasibility of the Rancho Cucamonga Animal Shelter operating as a No-Kill Shelter. The following information provides an overview of the Rancho Cucamonga animal control and shelter programs as well as the scope of work desired in the proposed consultation. THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ANIMAL CONTROL AND ANIMAL SHELTER SERVICES Located in western San Bernardino County, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is a general law city of approximately 150,000 residents. The City is a balanced community of industrial, commercial and residential uses. The community is experiencing strong growth in all of these areas. The City has a Council-City Manager form of government, with a directly elected Mayor and four Councilmembers. The City has two separate contracts with the County of San Bernardino to provide animal care and control services in our community: ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES: The City has contracted with the County for animal control services since 1983. The contract amount of $62,700 has remained unchanged since that time. The County keeps all revenues generated through the animal control programs, including license fees, etc. Per the contract, the County is required to provide an average of 120 hours per week in personnel to perform animal control services. These services include enforcement of all ordinances related to animal control, impounding and quarantining animals, investigations, licensing, vaccination clinics, house-to-house canvassing for license enfomement, and limited, special emergency field services. Special field services provided to the City in recent years per the contract include coyote control and mountain lion surveillance services. Until the City constructed our own Animal Shelter, all animals were housed at the County Animal Shelter located in Devore, California. ANIMAL SHELTER OPERATIONS: The City completed construction of the Rancho Cucamonga Animal Shelter located at 11780 Arrow Route in 1993. Due to budgetary restraints, the City was not in a fiscal position to operate the Shelter, which at that time was estimated to cost $650,000 annually. In 1996 the City determined that the most effective means of operating the Shelter would be via contract with another agency and sought proposals for Shelter operations services. The City entered into a $108,000 contract with the County to operate the Shelter and the Rancho Cucamonga Animal Shelter commenced operations in September 1996. At that time, the Shelter was open to the public five days per week. In 2001 our contract for Shelter operations was increased to $305,600 per year to due to the expansion of operating hours to seven days per week, and State legislation increasing the minimum holding period for stray animals and mandating the spaying/neutering of all animals adopted out of shelters. Per the contract between the City and the County for Shelter operations, the City is required to: · perform facility maintenance and routine janitorial services to non-animal areas · pay for utilities · provide furniture, office equipment (computers, copiers, etc.) and kennel equipment (cat cages, etc.) The County is required to: · operate the Shelter 7 days a week according to the agreed-upon schedule (11-6 Mon, Tues, Thurs & Fri; 11-7 Wed; and 11-5 Sat & Sun). · provide animal care 7 days per week · provide an average of 275 hours per week of personnel · provide all supplies associated with animal care and sanitation requirements (food, vaccinations, cleaning products, euthanasia solution), and dead animal disposal · collect fees which are retained by the County to offset costs of Shelter operations, veterinary fees, and any large and exotic animal housing at Devote Shelter · establish and supervise a Shelter volunteer program · communicate with City representative at least once a week to discuss Shelter operations · provide and maintain all vehicles used for Shelter services · assign and base an Animal Control Officer and vehicle at the Shelter · provide and operate an 600 megahertz radio base station · maintain a computerized licensing system on City-supplied computers BUDGET iNFORMATION The City's Animal Control and Animal Shelter annual budget is currently $435,700, which includes the contracts with the County, facility maintenance, and utilities. As stated previously, the County keeps all revenues associated with the animal care and control services. For example, in Fiscal Year 2001/02 the County collected and retained $375,000 in licensing fees, adoption fees, etc. SHELTER STATISTICS The Animal Shelter statistics for 2004 are attached. During that period of time, 5,376 animals were taken in at the Rancho Cucamonga Animal Shelter. The adoption and return-to-owner rates for dogs was 79% and for cats was 44%. II. SCOPE OF SERVICES The City is seeking proposals to for the preparation of a study addressing the feasibility of the Rancho Cucamonga Animal Shelter operating as a No-Kill facility. In general and at a minimum, the City is seeking a consultant to provide the following: · Define the term "No-Kill" as it relates to the operation of a municipal, open-access Shelter and define all related terms such as "healthy and treatable," "feral," "adoptable," and "limited access." · Review current operations of the Rancho Cucamonga Animal Shelter, including existing policies, procedures, services, and programs. As the focus of this study is No- -2- Kill, the research shall be similarly focused on those services and programs currently utilized in seeking high adoption rates and Iow euthanasia rates at the Shelter. · Provide an assessment to the City regarding the effectiveness of the above. · Research local community contacts such as animal advocacy groups, veterinarians, and volunteers and provide the City with an assessment of the effectiveness of and potential for local support for a No-Kill Animal Shelter. · Provide an objective and thorough analysis of the feasibility of the Rancho Cucamonga Animal Shelter operating as a No-Kill Shelter. This analysis shall include, but not be limited to, the following: o ~ecific definition of No-Kill as it would relate to the City referring to the Rancho Cucamonga Animal Shelter as "No-Kill," including the expected outcomes and goals as well as the measurements used to gauge effectiveness and success. o Identification of all revisions and additions to existing policies, procedures, and programs that would be required in order to achieve a No-Kill Rancho Cucamonga Animal Shelter. This shall include an assessment of the level of community support from local veterinarians, rescue groups, volunteers, etc., necessary to achieve and sustain a No-kill program. o Levels of service vs. cost: Identification of the fiscal requirements necessary to achieve and sustain a No-Kill Animal Shelter in Rancho Cucamonga in accordance with the definition provided above. The analysis shall identify long- term financial requirements in addition to any "start-up" or immediate costs. If the recommendations include grant funding or any one-time financial opportunities, the analysis shall identify and address funding requirements for the future beyond grants. Also identify realistic opportunities for long-term grant or foundation funding. o Proposed timeline for implementation of a plan to achieve a No-Kill status at the Animal Shelter, if feasible. For example, would any implementation process be completed in phases or may steps be taken for immediate implementation? III. QUALIFICATIONS The City is seeking a consultant with proven, verifiable experience and history in this type of work. Minimum qualifications will include: · Broad experience in both animal control and animal shelter operations, particularly with municipal, open-access operations. · Knowledge of State of California animal laws and regulations. · Knowledge of the history of the concept of No-Kill and all related issues and concerns. · Experience in implementing practices, policies, services, and programs at a municipal animal shelter(s) that have resulted in achieving a No-Kill standard at the shelter(s). Any documentation detailing specific, measurable results is desirable. IV. PROPOSALS Proposals shall, include all costs that would be incurred by the City for consultation services to prepare a study discussing the feasibility of the Rancho Cucamonga Animal Shelter operating as a No-Kill Shelter, including the above scope of services and any reimbursable expenses to be paid by the City. Proposals shall include a detailed description of the product that would be presented to the City as well as anticipated start and completion dates for the study. We would anticipate that any feasibility study would be presented to the City Council by the consultant and the proposal shall include any costs associated with these and any other meetings that the consultant feels will be necessary. Please contact Michelle Dawson of the City Manager's Office at (909) 477-2700, ext. 2007 for any additional information. Please submit proposals to the following by 5:00 p.m. on March 24, 2005: Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst III City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 City staff will review the submitted proposals and make appropriate recommendations to the City Council. The City reserves the right to reject all proposals and shall not be liable for any expenses or costs incurred by consultants in preparing proposals. Attachment: 2004 Rancho Cucamonga Animal Shelter statistics -4- Kennel Statistics Report Intakes from 01/01/04 to 12/31/04 Rancho Cucamonga Shelter Jurisdiction: ALL JURISDICTIONS CAT DOG KITTEN OTHER PUPPY TOTAL CONFISCATE ABANDON 2 12 0 0 0 14 BITE 0 10 0 0 1 11 HOSPITAL 0 1 0 0 0 1 I NVESTIGAT 0 2 0 0 0 2 OWNER DI 2 4 0 0 0 6 ~OLICE 3 29 3 0 3 38 TOTAL 7 58 3 0 4 72 OWNER SUR FIELD 60 21 11 0 16 108 NIGHT 0 1 0 0 0 1 OTC 106 226 56 4 54 446 TOTAL 166 248 67 4 70 555 RETURN OTC 23 109 31 0 49 212 TOTAL 23 109 31 0 49 212 STRAY FIELD 420 532 197 397 134 1680 NIGHT 1 21 0 1 0 23 OTC 694 865 891 94 290 2834 TOTAL 1115 1418 1088 492 424 4537 Kennel Statistics Report Outcomes from 01/01/04 to 12/31/04 Rancho Cucamonga Jurisdiction: ALL JURiSDICTiONS CAT DOG KITTEN OTHER PUPPY TOTAL ADOPTION EXCHANGE 1 4 2 0 1 8 :AIR 1 4 18 3 8 34 IN FOSTER 1 0 52 0 6 59 qEW 194 816 573 21 475 2079 PREVIOUS 0 5 1 0 4 10 RESCUE GRP 164 72 55 19 6 316 TOTAL 361 901 701 43 500 2506 DIED ENROUTE 1 2 1 2 0 6 IN FOSTER 3 0 43 I 0 47 IN KENNEL 3 0 8 3 1 15 TOTAL 7 2 52 6 1 68 EUTH ~EHAV HIST 38 29 4 5 3 79 BEHAV OBSV 50 49 10 1 1 111 BREED 0 0 0 97 0 97 BY VET 1 3 0 0 0 4 CONTAG DIS 50 8 43 0 4 105 FERAL 69 0 0 7 0 76 LAB 1 0 0 4 0 5 MEDICAL 404 136 239 115 7 901 TI ME 236 225 28 0 2 491 TOO YOUNG 58 0 100 34 I 193 WILDLIFE 0 0 0 109 0 109 TOTAL 907 450 424 372 18 2171 MISSING ENROUTE 6 0 0 0 0 6 ESCAPED FD 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 I 0 0 1 IN KENNEL I CAT DOG KITTEN OTHER PUPPY TOTAL MISSING TOTAL 7 1 0 0 0 8 RELOCATE 0 0 0 64 0 64 TOTAL 0 0 0 64 0 64 RTO 37 449 4 2 24 516 TOTAL 37 449 4 2 24 516 TRANSFER AN CONTROL 3 26 6 0 6 41 WILDLIFE 0 0 0 3 0 3 TOTAL 3 26 6 3 6 44 Kennel Statistics Report Service Requests from 01/01/04 to 12/31/04 Rancho Cucamonga Jurisdiction: ALL JURISDICTIONS CAT DOG KITTEN OTHER PUPPY Total , DISPO REQ FIELD 238 120 I 242 1 602 FIELD OWN I 8 0 0 0 OTC 16 35 0 8 I 60 OTC OWNED 49 117 4 15 9 194 Total 304 280 5 265 11 865 EUTH REQ FIELD OWN 9 27 0 0 1 37 NIGHT OWN 0 I 0 0 0 1 OTC OWNED 77 228 2 14 3 324 Total 86 256 2 14 4 362 Total 390 536 7 279 15 I