Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2005/04/20 - Agenda Packet
I:: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10500 Civic Center Drive ~ Rancho CuCamOnga, CA 91730-3801 AGENDAS Redevelopment Agency Fire Protection District City Council R~EGULAR MEETINGS Ist and 3rd Wednesdays ~- 7:00 p.m. APRIL 20, 2005 AGENCY~ BOARD & CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS William J. Alexander .................... Mayor Diane Williams ............... Mayor Pro Tem Rex Gutierrez ............................ Member L. Dennis Michael ..................... Member Sam Spagnolo .......................... Member Jack Lam ......................... City Manager James L. Markman ............. City Attorney Debra J. Adams ..................... City Clerk 5:30 p.m. 7:00 p.m. ORDER OF BUSINESS Closed Session ................... Tapia Conference Room Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting... Council Chambers Regular Fire Protection District Meeting ... Council Chambers Regular City Council Meeting ............. Counc# Chambers INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC cI cHO UCAMONC~ TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL The City Council encourages frae expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the Agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the City Council on any agenda item. Please sign in on the clipboard located at the desk behind the staff table. It is important to list your name, address and phone number. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under "Public Communications". Them is opportunity to speak under this section at the beginning and the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the City Council should be given to the City Clerk for distribution. To address the City Council, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. All items to be placed on a City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, one week prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's office receives all such items. AGENDA BACK-UP MATERIALS Staff reports and back-up materials for agenda items are available for review at the City Clerk's counter and the Public Library. A complete copy of the agenda is also available at the sign in desk located behind the staff table during the Council meeting. LIVE BROADCAST Council meetings are broadcast live on Channel 3 for those with cable television access. Meetings are rebroadcast on the second and fourth Wednesdays of each month at 11:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. The City has added the option for customers without cable access to view the meetings "on-demand" from their computers. The added feature of "Streaming Video On Demand" is available on the City's website at www.ci.rancho- cucamonga.ca.uslwhatsnew.htm for those with Hi-bandwidth (DSL/Cable Modem) or Low-bandwidth (Dial-up) Internet service. The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers Located at '10500 Civic Center Drive. Members of the City Council also sit as the Redevelopment Agency and the Fire District Board. Copies of City Council agendas and minutes can be found at http:llwww, ci. rancho.cucamonga, ca.us If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477-2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. ~ CITY COUNCIL AGENDA APRIL 20, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY (~,[~u~NCHO HALL, 10500 C~WC CENTER DRIVE UGAMONGA 1. Roll Call: Alexander __, Gutierrez __, Michael__, Spagnolo__, and Williams__. B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS 1. Announcement by the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society's Team in Training Program. 2. Presentation of CSMFO's Certificate of Award for Excellence for Outstanding Financial Reporting for the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2004. 3. Presentation of a Proclamation declaring April 25 - May 1 as WVest Nile Virus and Mosquito and Vector Control Awareness Week." 4. Presentation of a Proclamation declaring April 3 - 9 as "National Architecture Week." c. Pu.nIc COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. 1. Request by Steve Marston to discuss "Group Homes" in his neighborhood. The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember or member of the audience for discussion. 1. Approval of Warrants, Register 3/30/05 through 4/12/05 and Payroll 3 ending 4/6/05, for the total amount of $3,063,119.08. 2. Approve to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of March 26 31, 2005. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA APRIL 20, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY R,~cHo HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Marketplace Properties and Victoria Gardens Southern Parcel 12 Kv Electrical Distribution and Onsite System Cabling, Connection, Equipment Project, to be funded from Accts. 17053035650/1485705 and 17053035650/1487705 (Municipal Utility). RESOLUTION NO. 05-136 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE MARKETPLACE PROPERTIES AND VICTORIA GARDENS SOUTHERN PARCEL 12 KV ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION AND ONSITE SYSTEM CABLING, CONNECTIONS, EQUIPMENT PROJECT IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Chaffey-lsle House Remodel and Garage/Apartment Construction in said city and authorizing and directing the City Clerk to advertise to receive bids. RESOLUTION NO. 05-137 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "CHAFFEY-ISLE HOUSE REMODEL AND GARAGE/APARTMENT CONSTRUCTION" IN SAiD CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Citywide Street Name Sign Replacement, Phase 3, to be funded from Acct. 'No. 1025001-5300, as approved in the FY 04-05 budget. RESOLUTION NO. 05-138 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CITYVVlDE STREET NAME SIGN REPLACEMENT, PHASE 3, AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS 32 34 38 41 47 48 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA APRIL 20, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY 3 [[:~WCHO HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE CUCAMONGA 11. Approval of the plans and specifications for the Fuel Tank Retrofit with Aboveground Fuel Tanks for the Rancho Cucamonga Adult Sports Complex, to be funded from City Fund 25 Capital Reserves. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Grove Avenue Street Improvements from 8th Street to Arrow Route, to be funded from Acct. Nos. 11803035650/1472180-0 and 1208303565011472208-0. RESOLUTION NO. 05-139 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR "THE GROVE AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM 8TM STREET TO ARROW ROUTE" IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Renovation of Two Baseball Fields at Red Hill Community Park, to be funded from Park Development funds, Acct. No. 11203055650/1222120-0, as approved in the FY 2004/05 budget. RESOLUTION NO. 05-140 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "RENOVATION OF TVVO BASEBALL FIELDS AT RED HILL COMMUNITY PARK" AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS Approval of the Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update. Approval for the purchase of one (1) new John Deere 4720 compact utility tractor from Powerland Equipment in the amount of $26,852.18, to be funded from Acct. No. 1712001-5603. Approval to purchase HP Design Jet 5550ps 60-Inch Plotter and IBM p520 2-Way 1.65 GHz SMP Server in the total amount of $49,000.00, and authorization to appropriate $49,000.00 from the Computer Equipment Replacement fund into Acct. No. 1714001-5605. 52 54 57 62 65 69 81 83 CIT.Y COUNCIL AGENDA APRIL 20, 2005 - 7:00_ P.M. 4 THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY R,M~CHO HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE ['~UCAMONGA 12. 13. 14. 15. Approval to appropriate $11,240.00 from the 2003 California Law Enforcement Equipment Program (CLEEP) Grant Award fund balance into Acct. No. 1366702-5603, and $50,760.00 from the Fiscal Year 2003/04 United States Department of Justice Local Law Enforcement Block Grant (LLEBG) Award fund balance into Acct. No. 1368701- 5603 for the purchase of two (2) high speed digital license plate reading cameras and three (3) audio-video recording devices for the Police Station interview rooms. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities for 5844 East Avenue, located south of Wilson Avenue, submitted by Joseph W. Bonneville. RESOLUTION NO. 05-141 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR 5844 EAST AVENUE Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities, Monumentation Cash Deposit and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 for Tract Map 16567, located between Foothill Boulevard and San Bernardino Road and between Hellman and Malachite Avenues, submitted by Laing Homes. RESOLUTION NO. 05-142 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT FOR TRACT 16567 RESOLUTION NO. 05-143 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR TRACT MAP 16567 Approval of Map, Interim Basin Maintenance Agreement (CO 05-030), Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 7 for Tract 15982-1, located at the northeast corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Wilson Avenue, submitted by KB Home Greater Los Angeles. 85 87 89 90, 93 94 107 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA APRIL 20, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS~ CITY ~~¢NEHO I HALL, 10500 C~WC CENTER DRIVE UCAMONGA 16. 17. 18. 19. RESOLUTION NO. 05-144 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 15982-1, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AND INTERIM BASIN MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT RESOLUTION NO. 05-145 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 10 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7 FOR TRACT 15982-1 Approval to accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $1,063,948.00 to the apparent Iow bidder, C.P. Construction Co., Inc. (CO 05-031), and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $106,394.80 for the Base Line Road Storm Drain Improvements and Pavement Rehabilitation from Ramona Avenue to Hermosa Avenue, to be funded from Drainage funds, Acct. No. 11123035650/1465112- 0, Measure "1" Funds, Acct. No. 11763035650/1465176-0, AD 86-2 R/C Drainage District funds, Acct. No. 16063035650/1465606-0, and appropriate an additional amount of $260,000.00 from Measure "1" fund balance to Acct. No. 11763035650/1465176-0. Approval of Professional Services Agreement with No Kill Solutions (CO 05-032) for Animal Shelter Consultation Services in the amount of $14,000, and appropriate $14,000 to Acct. No. 10011045300. Approval to accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $138,188.00 to the apparent Iow bidder, Silvia Construction, Inc. (CO 05-033), and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $13,818.80 for the Sapphire Street Pavement Rehabilitation from 19th Street to Banyan Street, to be funded from Measure 'T' funds, Acct. No. 11763035650/1471176-0. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Letter of Credit, accept a Maintenance Letter of Credit and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for DRC2002-00601, located on the west side of Vineyard Avenue, approximately 600 feet south of Foothill Boulevard, submitted by Sommerville-Conzelman Company. 109 110 122 128 ' 136 141 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA APRIL 20, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY RANCHO HALL, 10500 Civic CENTER DRIVE 20. 21. 22. 23.¸ RESOLUTION NO. 05-146 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2002-00601 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Guarantee Cash Deposit and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for DRC2003-00319, located at the cul-de-sac terminus of Birdsong Place, west of Hermosa Avenue and south of Almond Street, submitted by Hardwood Homes. RESOLUTION NO. 05-147 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2003-00319 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK Approval to release the Faithful Performance Bond for Improvements for TR12659-4, located on the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and 24th Street (Wilson Avenue), submitted by Centex Homes. Approval to accept the Electrical Distribution System Conduit and Substructure Project, Contract No. 03-103, as complete, retain the Faithful Performance Bond as a Guarantee Bond, release the Labor and Material Bond, and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $528,852.09. RESOLUTION NO. 05-148 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM CONDUIT AND SUBSTRUCTURE PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. 03-103 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK Approval to release the Faithful Performance Bond, No. 08655345, in the amount of $75,865.00 for the Haven Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation from Alta Loma Drive to Lemon Avenue, Contract No. 03-131. 143 144 146 147 149 151 '152 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA APRIL 20, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY 7 RANCHO HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE E. CONSENT ORDINANCES I The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first reading. Second readings are expected to bo routine and non- controversial. The Council will act upon them at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion. No Items Submitted. I[ F.ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS I The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. 1. CONSIDERATION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT CONSOLIDATED PLAN AND ANNUAL ACTION PLAN - A 154 review of the Federally-required 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan and 2005-2006 Annual Action Plan, which includes the preliminary selection of CDBG projects, based on a new grant allocation of $1,134,608. The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. 1. CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY FOR THE ACQUISITION IN EMINENT DOMAIN OF CERTAIN REAL 270 PROPERTY FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS TO AND WIDENING OF BASE LINE ROAD ACROSS A PORTION OF APN 1100-011-02 (CONTINUED FROM MARCH 16, 2005) RESOLUTION NO. 05-094 281 A RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES AND AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION THEREOF, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS TO AND WIDENING OF BASE LINE ROAD (PORTIONS OF ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 1100-011-02) CITY COUNCIL AGENDA APRIL 20, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY 8 "ALL, o5oo c,v,c CE.TER D.,VE I[ H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS 1 The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. 1. UPDATE ON CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA'S AB 939/AB 1066 EFFORTS AND FUTURE PROGRAMS, MULTI-FAMILY RECYCLING PROGRAM AND EARTH DAY CELEBRATION (Oral) 2. APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING ALL FIRE STATIONS WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AS 288 SAFE SURRENDER SITES FOR NEWBORNS RESOLUTION NO. 05-149 290 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DESIGNATING PARTICIPATING FIRE STATIONS LOCATED IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AS "SAFE HAVENS" FOR THE SURRENDER OF NEWBORNS 3. APPROVAL TO ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED AND AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT IN THE 295 AMOUNT OF $6,810,793.70 TO THE APPARENT LOW BIDDER, RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. (CO 05-034), AND AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF A 10% CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $681,079.37 FOR THE HAVEN AVENUE STREET WIDENING AND STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FROM BASE LINE ROAD TO NORTH OF 19TM STREET, TO BE FUNDED FROM TRANSPORTATION FUNDS, ACCT. NO. 11243035650/1406124-0 AND BEAUTIFICATION FUNDS, ACCT. NO. 11103165650/1464110-0 AND APPROPRIATE AN ADDITIONAL ' AMOUNT OF $1,100,000.00 TO ACCT. NO. 11243035650/1406124- 0 FROM TRANSPORTATION FUND BALANCE I ,. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. 1. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Councilmember.) CITY COUNCIL AGENDA APRIL 20, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY 9 ~.,RANcHO HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE __[ ~UCAMONGA J. ADJOURNMENT ! I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on April 14, 2005, seventy two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. CheckNo. AP-00221237 AP-00221238 AP-00221240 AP-00221240 AP-00221241 AP-00221242 AP-00221245 AP-00221246 AP-00221247 AP-00221249 AP-00221250 AP-00221250 AP-00221250 AP-00221250 AP-00221250 AP 00221251 AP 00221252 AP 00221252 AP 00221252 AP 00221252 AP 00221252 AP 00221252 AP 00221252 AP 00221252 AP-00221252 AP-00221252 AP-00221252 AP-00221252 AP-00221252 AP-00221252 AP-00221252 AP-00221252 AP-00221252 AP-00221252 AP-00221252 AP-00221253 AP-00221254 AP-00221255 AP-00221256 AP-00221257 AP-00221258 AP-00221259 AP-00221261 AP-00221264 AP-00221265 AP-00221265 AP-00221265 AP-00221265 AP-00221266 AP-00221268 AP-00221269 AP-00221270 AP-00221271 AP-00221271 Check Date 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/3O/2OO5 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/30/2005 through 4/12/2005 Vendor Name ABLAC ADAMI, FAROKH ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT ALL CITIES TOOLS ALL PRO PLUMBING CORPORATION AMERICA WEST LANDSCAPE INC AMERICAN CLASSIC SANITATION INC. APIP 71/H2 RANCHO CUC ARCH WIRELESS ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP ARCHITERKA DESIGN GROUP ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP ARCO NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION CO. ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION ARROWHEAD CKEDIT UNION ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION ARROWHEAD CREDIT LrNION ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION ASIAN GANG INVESTIGATOR'S ASSOCIATION ( ASIAN GANG INVESTIGATOR'S ASSOCIATION ( AUFBAU CORPORATION B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE BARNHART 1NC BELFOR USA GROUP INC BENGTZEN, WANDA BOPKO, CHRISTOPHER BRUCE, INGRID BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC CALIFORNIA CONTRACT CITIES ASSOCIATION CALIFORNIA, STATE OF CHARTER COMMLrNICATIONS CHOICE POINT BUSINESS AND GOVERNMENT ', CIVIC SOLUTIONS INC CIVIC SOLUTIONS INC Amount 16.39 109.60 750.00 -75.00 601.25 1,000.00 8,734.25 155.40 1,000.00 1,268.87 4,725.00 80.32 876.00 768.00 2,376.00 15,000.00 17.11 920.00 207.79 32.69 120.80 33.57 119.97 137.90 85.93 47.40 20.99 941.83 420.00 146.90 918.24 476.32 429.78 45.85 137.39 375.00 375.00 29,341.00 179.94 53,071.88 3,277.10 205.00 43.74 72.90 2,498.00 475.80 222.83 1,403.13 25.00 281.25 69.85 49.00 1,586.25 600.00 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 1 Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 04/13/200 Time: ~ 14:47:5 Cheek No. Cheek Date AP - 00221271 3/30/2005 AP - 00221272 3/30/2005 AP - 00221273 3/30/2005 AP - 00221273 3/30/2005 AP - 00221274 3/30/2005 AP - 00221275 3/30/2005 AP - 00221276 3/30/2005 AP - 00221276 3/30/2005 AP - 00221277 3/30/2005 AP - 00221278 3/30/2005 AP - 00221283 3/30/2005 AP - 00221285 3/30/2005 AP - 00221285 3/30/2005 AP - 00221285 3/30/2005 AP - 00221285 3/30/2005 AP - 00221285 3/30/2005 AP - 00221285 3/30/2005 AP - 00221285 3/30/2005 AP - 00221285 3/30/2005 AP - 00221285 3/30/2005 AP - 00221285 3/30/2005 AP - 00221285 3/30/2005 AP - 00221285 3/30/2005 AP - 00221285 3/30/2005 AP - 00221285 3/30/2005 AP - 00221285 3/30/2005 AP - 00221285 3/30/2005 AP - 00221285 3/30/2005 AP - 00221285 3/30/2005 AP - 00221285 3/30/2005 AP - 00221285 3/30/2005 AP - 00221285 3/30/2005 AP - 00221285 3/30/2005 AP - 00221285 3/30/2005 AP - 00221285 3/30/2005 AP - 00221285 3/30/2005 AP - 00221285 3/30/2005 AP - 00221285 3/30/2005 AP - 00221285 3/30/2005 AP - 00221285 3/30/2005 AP - 00221285 3/30/2005 AP - 00221285 3/30/2005 AP - 00221285 3/30/2005 AP - 00221285 3/30/2005 AP - 00221285 3/30/2005 AP - 00221285 3/30/2005 AP - 00221285 3/30/2005 AP - 00221285 3/30/2005 AP - 00221285 3/30/2005 AP - 00221285 3/30/2005 AP - 00221286 3/30/2005 AP - 00221286 3/30/2005 AP - 00221288 3/30/2005 AP - 00221291 3/30/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/30/2005 through 4/12/2005 Vendor Name CWIC SOLUTIONS INC CLABBY, SANDRA CLASS SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS CLASS SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS CNOA REGION V COLLISION INVESTIGATION SOLUTIONS COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY COMP USA INC COSCO FIRE PROTECTION CUCAMONGA SCHOOL DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY CUCAMONGA VALLEY CUCAMONGA VALLEY CUCAMONGA VALLEY CUCAMONGA VALLEY CUCAMONGA VALLEY CUCAMONGA VALLEY CUCAMONGA VALLEY CUCAMONGA VALLEY CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT WATER DISTRICT WATER DISTRICT WATER DISTRICT WATER DISTRICT WATER DISTRICT WATER DISTRICT WATER DISTRICT WATER DISTRICT WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CYBERCOM RESOURCES INC CYBERCOM RESOURCES INC D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES Amount 15,820.00 1,000.00 362.47 3,750.00 315.00 897.00 5.31 355.39 145.95 240.00 5,773.14 114.88 40.58 233.33 209.18 157.22 189.43 228.73 336.58 3,529.84 112.57 119.48 82.56 105.68 105.68 22.48 126.38 260.93 73.60 195.04 72.78 44.03 110.28 216.18 85.43 48.63 40.58 199.52 73.60 73.60 715.18 55.20 2,272.28 73.60 162.03 134.43 198.83 329.93 85.43 85.08 700.00 3,325.00 297.39 4,307.51 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 2 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 04/13/200 Time:~ 14:47:5 CheekNo. AP-00221291 AP-00221292 AP-00221293 AP-00221294 AP-00221295 AP-00221296 AP- 00221297 AP-00221298 AP-00221301 AP-00221302 AP-00221303 AP-00221303 AP-00221303 AP-00221303 AP-00221303 AP-00221303 AP-00221303 AP-00221304 AP-00221304 AP-00221304 AP-00221304 AP-00221306 AP-00221306 AP 00221307 AP 00221310 AP 00221311 AP 00221313 AP 00221314 AP 00221316 AP 00221317 AP 00221318 AP 00221319 AP 00221320 AP 00221321 AP 00221323 AP 00221324 AP 00221325 AP-00221326 AP-00221326 AP-00221326 AP-00221326 AP-00221327 AP-00221327 AP-00221327 AP-00221327 AP-00221330 AP-00221334 AP-00221334 AP-00221334 AP-00221335 AP-00221336 AP-00221337 AP-00221338 AP-00221338 Check Date 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/30/2005 through 4/12/2005 Vendor Name DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES DAWSON SURVEYING 1NC. DE LEISE, JENAE DIRECTV DMJM HARRIS E TEAM INC. ELECTRONICS WAREHOUSE ELLISON, SCHNEIDER & HARRIS LLP ESGIL CORPORATION EXCLUSIVE EMAGES FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES FORD OF UPLAND INC FORD OF UPLAND INC FOX GROUP, THE WILLIAM FULLMER CONSTRUCTION GALLANT, PAUL GE ENERGY RENTALS GEOGRAPHICS GIRON, GABBY GRAINGER, WW GREGG ELECTRIC INC GUARDIAN HANSON, BARRYE HARALAMBOS BEVERAGE COMPANY HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES IBM CORPORATION INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN INTRAVAIA ROCK AND SAND INC IRON MOUNTAIN OSDP JRC HOUSING INC KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN 1NC KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN 1NC Amount 5,225.00 330.00 519.24 63.05 7,212.69 395.00 22.96 2,296.50 37,433.86 58.18 16.81 19.46 17.05 13.32 11.32 29.66 11.43 720.00 612.00 612.00 960.00 763.30 105.82 502.80 500.00 254.05 1,071.00 181.02 20.00 5,236.65 1,000.00 2,789.15 30.00 598.07 303.60 303.60 303.60 933.82 307.81 430.97 63.72 105.42 -32.30 47.35 22.56 849.66 230.25 189.05 209.65 315.00 386.00 7,897.50 71,051.02 1,923.68 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 3 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 04/13/200 Time~.,~ 14:47:5 Check No. AP-00221339 AP-00221340 AP-00221341 AP-00221342 AP-00221344 AP-00221345 AP-00221345 AP-00221345 AP-00221347 AP-00221349 AP-00221349 AP-00221349 AP-00221351 AP-00221352 AP-00221353 AP-00221354 AP-00221357 AP-00221358 AP-00221358 AP-00221358 AP-00221358 AP-00221358 AP-00221358 AP-00221360 AP-00221360 AP-00221361 AP-00221362 AP-00221363 AP-00221364 AP-00221365 AP-00221365 AP-00221365 AP-00221365 AP-00221365 AP-00221365 AP-00221365 AP-00221365 AP-00221365 AP-00221365 AP-00221365 AP-00221365 AP-00221365 AP-00221365 AP-00221365 AP 00221365 AP 00221365 AP 00221365 AP 00221365 AP 00221365 AP 00221365 AP-00221365 AP-00221365 AP-00221365 AP-00221365 Check Date 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/30/2005 through 4/12/2005 Vendor Name KELLY PAPER COMPANY KING, DAN KOCH MATERIALS COMPANY LARSON, KIRK LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE MANN1NO, JOE MARSHALL PLUMBING MARSHALL PLUMBING MARSHALL PLUMBING MCLNERNEY, JAMES MCMURRAY AND STERN INC MINARD, JON MMASC NATIONAL DEFERRED NEC BUSINESS NETWORK SOLUTIONS INC NEC BUSINESS NETWORK SOLUTIONS INC NEC BUSINESS NETWORK SOLUTIONS INC NEC BUSINESS NETWORK SOLUTIONS 1NC NEC BUSINESS NETWORK SOLUTIONS INC NEC BUSINESS NETWORK SOLUTIONS INC NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS NINYO AND MOORE GEOTECHNICAL NURMI, SUE O'DONNELL, MARK OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFC OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT Asnount 45.54 254.05 132.33 41.94 35.00 2,375.00 4,658.00 2,642.30 100.00 363.93 761.07 -281.25 254.05 519.17 254.05 50.00 15,120.41 200.00 200.00 150.00 400.00 661.18 181.72 46.28 83.88 800.00 55.31 254.05 145.35 348.53 26.33 -1.03 1,033.54 31.58 23.14 10.26 -210.11 18.30 403.48 396.22 35.67 55.85 8.10 34.50 28.84 10.37 23.26 23.62 14.80 117.43 14.12 764.96 276.76 220.89 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 4 Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Porixait Layout Current Date: 04/13/200 Time~- 14:47:5 Check No. AP-00221366 AP-00221366 AP-00221367 AP-00221368 AP-00221369 AP-00221370 AP-00221371 AP-00221373 AP-00221374 AP-00221374 AP-00221378 AP-00221379 AP-00221381 AP-00221382 AP-00221384 AP-00221384 AP-00221384 AP-00221385 AP-00221387 AP-00221388 AP-00221388 AP-00221389 AP-00221390 AP-00221391 AP-00221392 AP-00221393 AP-00221394 AP-00221394 AP-00221394 AP-00221394 AP-00221394 AP-00221394 AP-00221394 AP-00221394 AP-00221394 AP 00221394 AP 00221394 AP 00221394 AP 00221394 AP 00221396 AP 00221396 AP 00221396 AP-00221397 AP-00221398 AP-00221398 AP-00221399 AP-00221401 AP-00221402 AP-00221403 AP-00221404 AP-00221405 AP-00221406 AP-00221407 AP-00221408 Cheek Date 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/30/2005 through 4/12/2005 Vendor Name OFFICE MAX OFFICE MAX ONTARIO WIN'NELSON CO OWEN ELECTRIC PACIFIC CONSTRUCTION GROUP PARAGON SANTA ANITA LLC PARAGON SANTA ANITA LLC PDC LLC/IRVINE PEP BOYS PEP BOYS PERRY AND SON, T PETERMAN LUMBER INC PLAZA DEVELOPMENTS PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY PRUTTING, PATRICIA QWEST RHF1NC RHF INC RANCHO CUCAMONGA PUBLIC LIBRARY FOU? RCPFA RED WING SHOE STORE RED WING SHOE STORE RIALTO, CITY OF RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON S B AND O INC S B AND O INC S B AND O INC SAFE KIDS CAMPAIGN SAN ANTONIO COMMUNITY HOSPITAL SAN ANTONIO COMMUNITY HOSPITAL SAN BE1LNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SAN GABRIEL VALLEY WATER COMPANY SANCHEZ, STEVE SAPIEN, RAMON SEQUEL CONTRACTORS INC SHAUN GALLAGHER SHAVER, LAWRENCE T SIGN SHOP, THE Amount 675.81 464.19 106.12 1,899.56 1,000.00 2,179.69 109.17 1,000.00 10.74 16.13 10,600.00 40.89 340.00 6.81 7.00 7.00 7.00 2,600.00 6.47 111.32 108.21 5.00 6,149.27 150.00 150.00 500.00 52.00 4,112.82 1,506.02 30.00 3,430.10 23,648.12 158.80 4,514.41 75.00 286.00 1,567.47 130.00 1,240.00 3,599.80 720.00 2,770.20 120.00 554.00 554.00 214.00 12,500.00 1,000.00 336.30 10.00 22,867.59 500.00 1,000.00 1,348.33 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 5 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 04/13/200 Time ~ 14:47:5 CheckNo. AP-00221408 AP-00221409 AP-00221411 AP-00221411 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP 00221416 AP 00221416 AP 00221416 AP 00221416 AP 00221416 AP 00221416 AP 00221416 AP 00221416 AP 00221416 AP 00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 Check Date 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/3O/2O05 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2O05 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/30/2005 through 4/12/2005 Vendor Name SIGN SHOP, THE SIMPLOT PARTNERS SO CALIF GAS COMPANY SO CALIF GAS COMPANY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON Amount 123.87 299.55 1,177.32 378.33 15.14 15.62 15.02 17.96 18.86 15.37 25.60 110.88 23.48 19.99 15.14 15.14 488.72 15.74 15.13 309.04 19.93 15.00 15.13 120.45 14.99 15.13 15.13 19.93 41.71 16.13 15.00 15.00 15.13 15.14 51.42 15.14 16.10 61.10 40.11 14.63 83.53 93.94 14.63 28.08 28.08 22.17 171.43 15.13 15.64 15.50 14.63 15.14 17.28 14.64 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 6 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout CurrentDate: 04/13/200 Timei'~d4:47:5, Cheek No. Cheek Date AP - 00221416 3/30/2005 AP - 00221416 3/30/2005 AP - 00221416 3/30/2005 AP - 00221416 3/30/2005 AP - 00221416 3/30/2005 AP - 00221416 3/30/2005 AP - 00221416 3/30/2005 AP - 00221416 3/30/2005 AP - 00221416 3/30/2005 AP - 00221416 3/30/2005 AP - 00221416 3/30/2005 AP - 00221416 3/30/2005 AP - 00221416 3/30/2005 AP - 00221416 3/30/2005 AP - 00221416 3/30/2005 AP - 00221416 3/30/2005 AP - 00221416 3/30/2005 AP - 00221416 3/30/2005 AP - 00221416 3/30/2005 AP - 00221416 3/30/2005 AP - 00221416 3/30/2005 AP - 00221416 3/30/2005 AP - 00221416 3/30/2005 AP - 00221416 3/30/2005 AP - 00221416 3/30/2005 AP - 00221416 3/30/2005 AP - 00221416 3/30/2005 AP - 00221416 3/30/2005 AP - 00221416 3/30/2005 AP - 00221416 3/30/2005 AP - 00221416 AP - 00221416 AP - 00221416 AP - 00221416 AP - 00221416 AP - 00221416 AP - 00221416 AP - 00221416 AP - 00221416 AP - 00221416 AP - 00221416 AP - 00221416 AP - 00221416 AP - 00221416 AP - 00221416 AP - 00221416 AP - 00221416 AP - 00221416 AP - 00221416 AP - 00221416 AP - 00221416 AP - 00221416 AP - 00221416 AP - 00221416 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/30/2005 through 4/12/2005 Vendor Name SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 3/30/2005 SOUTHERN 3/30/2005 SOUTHERN 3/30/2005 SOUTHERN 3/30/2005 SOUTHERN 3/30/2005 SOUTHERN 3/30/2005 SOUTHERN 3/30/2005 SOUTHERN 3/30/2005 SOUTHERN 3/30/2005 SOUTHERN 3/30/2005 SOUTHERN 3/30/2005 SOUTHERN 3/30/2005 SOUTHERN 3/30/2005 SOUTHERN 3/30/2005 SOUTHERN 3/30/2005 SOUTHERN 3/30/2005 SOUTHERN 3/30/2005 SOUTHERN 3/30/2005 SOUTHERN 3/30/2005 SOUTHERN 3/30/2005 SOUTHERN 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 CALIFORNIA EDISON CALIFORNIA EDISON CALIFORNIA EDISON CALIFORNIA EDISON CALIFORNIA EDISON CALIFORNIA EDISON CALIFORNIA EDISON CALIFORNIA EDISON CALIFORNIA EDISON CALIFORNIA EDISON CALIFORNIA EDISON CALIFORNIA EDISON CALIFORNIA EDISON CALIFORNIA EDISON CALIFORNIA EDISON CALIFORNIA EDISON CALIFORNIA EDISON CALIFORNIA EDISON CALIFORNIA EDISON CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON Amount 23.55 14.63 37.35 16.50 15.24 15.50' 15.14 14.63 158.91 15.14 15.64 93.21 17.23 20.80 15.84 15.14 66.34 15.75 15.13 120.71 43.07 150.80 15.63 23.21 15.71 21.21 15.13 15.00 15.60 15.72 15.50 179.92 44.79 167.83 15.64 14.64 18.56 14.64 15.50 16.59 2,818.44 50.85 109.37 15.73 15.13 15.23 15.74 100.08 18.35 15.24 15.50 15.14 15.64 15.00 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 7 Report:CK AGENDA_PEG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 04/13/200 Time; q 14:47:5 Check No. AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP 00221416 AP 00221416 AP 00221416 AP 00221416 AP 00221416 AP 00221416 AP 00221416 AP 00221416 AP 00221416 AP 00221416 AP 00221416 AP 00221416 AP 00221416 AP 00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 Check Date 3/3O/2O05 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2O05 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/3O/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/30/2005 through 4/12/2005 Vendor Name SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON Amount 16.13 119.32 15.50 95.28 16.13 37.83 15.51 27.02 14.50 72.35 15.50 14.50 62.73 2,030.80 53.92 31.86 15.14 15.86 15.23 15.38 65.10 15.13 79.45 88.60 95.26 102.36 117.39 89.75 79.38 83.27 14.50 14.50 14.50 14.50 14.64 15.10 15.64 15.60 15.52 19.23 22.19 15.14 59.36 15.76 16.36 15.36 14.64 15.13 15.13 15.13 117.24 15.14 15.36 3,923.54 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 8 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portzait Layout Current Date: 04/13/200 Time~b 14:47:5 Check No. AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221416 AP-00221417 AP-00221418 AP 00221419 AP 00221419 AP 00221419 AP 00221419 AP 00221420 AP 00221422 AP 00221423 AP 00221424 AP 00221424 AP 00221425 AP-00221425 AP-00221426 AP-00221426 AP-00221427 AP-00221428 AP-00221430 AP-00221432 AP-00221432 AP-00221433 AP-00221434 AP-00221435 AP-00221435 AP-00221437 AP-00221437 AP-00221437 AP-00221438 AP-00221439 AP-00221441 AP-00221444 AP-00221444 AP-00221444 AP-00221444 AP-00221444 AP-00221444 AP-00221444 AP-00221444 AP-00221444 AP~00221444 AP-00221444 AP-00221444 AP-00221444 Cheek Date 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/30/2005 through 4/12/2005 Vendor Name SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHLAND SPORTS OFFICIALS STANDARD DRYWALL INC STANDARD DRYWALL INC STANDARD DRYWALL INC STANDARD DRYWALL INC STANDARD PACIFIC OF INLAND EMPIRE SUNSHINE WINDOWS T MOBILE TANGRAM INTERIORS TANGRAM INTERIORS TARGET TARGET TAUSSIG AND ASSOCIATES INC, DAVID TAUSSIG AND ASSOCIATES INC, DAVID TIME WARNER TELECOM TRAFFIC SPECIALTIES INC TYPECARE UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P~ UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P, UNITED WAY UNITEK TECHNOLOGY INC UPS UPS US PRINTING US PRINTING US PRINTING US TRAFFIC CORPORATION UVERITECH INC VENUES TODAY INC VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON Amount 15.50 26.55 133.54 44.56 86.05 45.31 14.63 15.14 15.14 14.64 14.64 990.81 664.00 7,413.88 6,067.00 -741.39 -606.70 1,000.00 665.00 217.10 576.78 576.78 28.65 48.11 190.00 919.97 1,287.45 178.87 55.00 2,769.42 32,539.22 46.00 2,078.50 17.53 48.67 132.53 99.56 389.45 887.86 81.39 200.00 0.11 59.50 0.22 27.30 0.61 0.23 1,269.50 171.20 21.05 30.46 62.62 29.48 29.93 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 9 Report:CK AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 04/13/200 Tim,~ 14:47:5 Check No. AP-00221444 AP-00221444 AP-00221444 AP-00221444 AP-00221444 AP-00221444 AP-00221444 AP-00221444 AP-00221444 AP-00221444 AP-00221444 AP-00221444 AP-00221444 AP-00221444 AP-00221444 AP-00221444 AP-00221444 AP-00221444 AP-00221444 AP-00221444 AP-00221444 AP-00221444 AP-00221444 AP-00221444 AP-00221444 AP-00221444 AP 00221444 AP 00221444 AP 00221444 AP 00221444 AP 00221444 AP 00221444 AP 00221445 AP 00221445 AP 00221445 AP-00221446 AP-00221447 AP-00221449 AP-00221449 AP-00221449 AP-00221450 AP-00221450 AP-00221451 AP-00221452 AP-00221453 AP-00221454 AP-00221455 AP-00221455 AP-00221455 AP-00221456 AP-00221459 AP-00221460 AP-00221461 AP-00221461 Check Date 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 3/30/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Cheek Register 3/30/2005 through 4/12/2005 Vendor Name VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VIDEO GUYS, THE VIDEO GUYS, THE VIDEO GUYS, THE VIGILANCE, TERRENCE VISION SERVICE PLAN CA WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WEIR, JEWELL WENGER CORPORATION WHITE CAP CONST SUPPLY WILSHIRE GRAND HOTEL, THE XEROX CORPORATION XEROX CORPORATION XEROX CORPORATION ZUMAR INDUSTRIES INC A AND A AUTOMOTIVE A AND R TIRE SERVICE AA EQUIPMENT AA EQUIPMENT Amount 29.94 28.71 29.23 92.01 91.58 92.01 92.01 92.01 92.01 92.01 28.94 29.93 29.23 92.01 93.44 90.55 20.96 20.81 21.68 20.81 20.48 29.94 50.91 92.01 123.84 29.23 132.94 63.69 92.01 92.01 90.55 20.81 184.26 100.00 684.21 550.00 7,989.84 44.49 155.52 171.65 568.92 1,405.56 320.00 16,740.98 784.75 1,328.90 176.33 10,594.45 340.49 1,513.78 50.00 3,527.80 1,086.40 2,413.60 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 10 Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 04/13/200 Tim72.' ' ~.7:5 Check No. AP-00221461 AP-00221461 AP-00221461 AP-00221461 AP-00221461 AP-00221461 AP-00221462 AP-00221463 AP-00221463 AP-00221463 AP-00221463 AP-00221463 AP-00221464 AP-00221465 AP-00221465 AP-00221465 AP-00221466 AP-00221467 AP-00221468 AP-00221469 AP-00221471 AP-00221472 AP-00221472 AP-00221473 AP-00221474 AP-00221474 AP-00221475 AP-00221477 AP-00221478 AP-00221479 AP-00221480 AP-00221481 AP-00221482 AP-00221482 AP-00221483 AP-00221483 AP-00221484 AP-00221484 AP-00221484 AP-00221484 AP-00221484 AP 00221484 AP 00221485 AP 00221486 AP 00221487 AP 00221488 AP 00221489 AP 00221489 AP 00221490 AP-00221491 AP-00221492 AP-00221493 AP-00221494 AP-00221495 Check Date 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 · 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/30/2005 through 4/12/2005 Vendor Name AA EQUIPMENT AA EQUIPMENT AA EQUIPMENT AA EQUIPMENT AA EQUIPMENT AA EQUIPMENT AAVCO ABC LOCKSMITHS ABC LOCKSMITHS ABC LOCKSMITHS ABC LOCKSMITHS ABC LOCKSMITHS ABLAC ADAMSON, RONALD ADAMSON, RONALD ADAMSON, RONALD ADT SECURITY SERVICES INC AIRGAS WEST ALL CITIES TOOLS ALLEN, SYLVESTER R ALPHAGRAPHICS AMERICAN LANDSCAPE INC AMERICAN LANDSCAPE INC AMPHASTAR PHARMACEUTICALS 1NC AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES ARBOR NURSERY 1NC ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES ASSI SECURITY ASSITEJ USA ASSOC. OF PERFORMING ARTS PRESENTERS AUTO SPECIALISTS AUTO SPECIALISTS BASELINE HARDWARE BASELINE HARDWARE BERGELECTRIC CORPORATION BERGELECTRIC CORPORATION BERGELECTRIC CORPORATION BERGELECTRIC CORPORATION BERGELECTRIC CORPORATION BERGELECTRIC CORPORATION BIRKETT, ALYCE BRODART BOOKS BROOKS, JEANNINE BRYANT, LAWANDA BURR CYCLES I-NC, JOHN BURR CYCLES INC, JOHN CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC ENTRY CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD CALIFORNIA PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT RE~ CALIFORNIA, STATE OF Amount 26.80 156.96 385.01 122.71 237.05 300.00 7,113.00 84.05 80.81 7.54 147.79 151.24 273.17 1,320.00 1,188.00 1,089.00 349.35 258.70 242.44 56.85 380.90 -27,777.30 277,773.03 15,000.00 184.68 191.99 656.20 666.26 7,205.08 325.00 125.00 450.00 51.66 509.83 60.09 18.18 -8.27 82.83 -6,495.45 66,981.19 -5,315.50 56,514.16 170.00 2,700.00 340.00 250.00 234.17 542.29 150.00 25.00 22.50 232.33 249.00 3,058.74 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 11 Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 04/13/200 Time:/~l 4:47:5 Check No. AP-00221496 AP-00221497 AP-00221497 AP-00221497 AP-00221497 AP-00221498 AP-00221499 AP-00221500 AP-00221500 AP200221501 AP-00221502 AP-00221503 AP-00221504 AP-00221504 AP-00221504 AP-00221504 AP-00221504 AP-00221504 AP-00221505 AP-00221505 AP-00221507 AP-00221508 AP-00221509 AP-00221509 AP-00221509 AP-00221510 AP-00221510 AP-00221512 AP-00221513 AP-00221514 AP-00221516 AP-00221516 AP-00221516 AP-00221516 AP-00221516 AP-00221516 AP-00221516 AP-00221516 AP 00221516 AP 00221516 AP 00221516 AP 00221516 AP 00221516 AP 00221516 AP 00221516 AP 00221516 AP 00221516 AP-00221516 AP-00221516 AP-00221516 AP-00221516 AP-00221516 AP-00221516 AP-00221516 Check Date 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/30/2005 through 4/12/2005 Vendor Name CALIFORNIA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF CASTANEDA, JENNIFER CASTLE PARK CERTIFIED AUTO CARE CERTIFIED AUTO CARE CHAND, PAMILA CHILDRENS MUSEUM AT LA HABRA, THE CITY RENTALS CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES 1NC. CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY CONCEPCION, CECILIA CONENGR CORP COPP CRUSHING CORP, DAN COPP CRUSHING CORP, DAN COPP CRUSHING CORP, DAN COSCO FIRE PROTECTION COSCO FIRE PROTECTION COURT TRUSTEE COURT TRUSTEE COVERMASTER INC CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT Amount 145.20 866.00 32.00 670.00 15.00 75.00 50.00 1,478.10 20.02 298.00 180.00 251.70 241.63 165.01 82.85 101.12 46.30 148.80 65.71 73.19 48.00 1,000.00 10.00 50.00 10.00 -24.00 240.00 118.50 200.00 215.00 249.08 468.04 171.33 745.88 2,734.18 23.63 56.33 46.33 182.73 39.73 35.98 55.20 148.23 382.71 155.13 21.73 232.18 166.73 105.68 357.53 73.60 67.83 74.73 211.48 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 12 Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 04/13/200 Timely_ 4:47:5 Check No: Check Date AP - 00221516 4/6/2005 AP - 00221516 4/6/2005 AP - 00221516 4/6/2005 AP - 00221516 4/6/2005 AP - 00221516 4/6/2005 AP- 00221516 4/6/2005 AP - 00221516 4/6/2005 AP - 00221516 4/6/2005 AP - 00221516 4/6/2005 AP - 00221516 4/6/2005 AP - 00221516 4/6/2005 AP - 00221516 4/6/2005 AP - 00221516 4/6/2005 AP - 00221516 4/6/2005 AP - 00221516 4/6/2005 AP - 00221516 4/6/2005 AP - 00221516 4/6/2005 AP - 00221516 4/6/2005 AP - 00221516 4/6/2005 AP- 00221516 4/6/2005 AP - 00221516 4/6/2005 AP - 00221516 4/6/2005 AP - 00221516 4/6/2005 AP - 00221516 4/6/2005 AP - 00221516 4/6/2005 AP - 00221516 4/6/2005 AP - 00221516 4/6/2005 AP - 00221517 4/6/2005 AP - 00221518 4/6/2005 AP ~ 00221519 .4/6/2005 AP - 00221519 4/6/2005 AP - 00221519 4/6/2005 AP - 00221520 4/6/2005 AP - 00221520 4/6/2005 AP - 00221520 4/6/2005 AP - 00221521 4/6/2005 AP - 00221522 4/6/2005 AP - 00221523 4/6/2005 AP - 00221524 4/6/2005 AP - 00221525 4/6/2005 AP - 00221526 4/6/2005 AP - 00221527 4/6/2005 AP - 00221528 4/6/2005 AP - 00221529 4/6/2005 AP - 00221529 4/6/2005 AP - 00221530 4/6/2005 AP - 00221531 4/6/2005 AP - 00221532 4/6/2005 AP - 00221533 4/6/2005 AP - 00221534 4/6/2005 AP - 00221535 4/6/2005 AP - 00221535 4/6/2005 AP - 00221535 4/6/2005 AP - 00221535 4/6/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/30/2005 through 4/12/2005 Vendor Name CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT D 3 EQUIPMENT D 7 CONSULTING 1NC D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES DAVIS, GEORGE DEER CREEK CAR CARE CENTER DELTA DENTAL DELTA MICROIMAG1NG INC DIETERICH POST COMPANY DISPENSING TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION DOMINGUEZ GENERAL ENGINEERING CONTR~ DOMINGUEZ GENERAL ENGINEERING CONTR/ DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION DURA ART STONE EMCOR SERVICE ESPINO'S COP SHOP INC EXPERIAN EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY Amount 232.18 141.43 199.98 182.73 483.57 97.73 110.28 155.13 20.56 20.56 22.48 38.28 35.98 35.98 656.29 791.13 651.24 77.38 227.58 166.63 88.53 384.10 57.83 2,734.18 806.08 511.67 832.36 183.56 750.00 293.08 933.12 801.66 2,750.00 9.14 1,721.24 11,220.00 18,848.75 175.00 1,750.00 33,723.52 634.73 598.49 955.97 -9,402.00 94,020.00 78.55 999.92 1,925.56 78.16 50.00 22.06 42.79 91.82 45.91 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 13 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portxait Layout Current Date: 04/13/200 TimT~ 14:47:5 Check No. AP-00221535 AP-00221536 AP-00221537 AP-00221537 AP-00221537 AP-00221537 AP-00221538 AP-00221539 AP-00221540 AP-00221541 AP-00221541 AP-00221541 AP-00221541 AP-00221541 AP-00221541 AP-00221541 AP-00221543 AP-00221543 AP-00221544 AP-00221545 AP-00221545 AP-00221547 AP-00221548 AP-00221549 AP-00221550 AP-00221551 AP-00221552 AP-00221552 AP-00221553 AP-00221554 AP-00221560 AP-00221561 AP-00221561 AP-00221561 AP-00221561 AP-00221562 AP-00221562 AP-00221562 AP-00221562 AP-00221562 AP 00221563 AP 00221564 AP 00221565 AP 00221566 AP 00221567 AP 00221568 AP 00221569 AP 00221570 AP 00221570 AP 00221570 AP-00221570 AP-00221571 AP-00221571 AP-00221572 Check Date 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/30/2005 through 4/12/2005 Vendor Name EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY F & F SIMON RANCHO TECH CENTER FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP FENCE CRAFT OF UPLAND INC FILARSKY AND WATT FILTER RECYCLING SERVICE INC FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES FiNESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES FiNESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES FIRST PLACE TROPHIES FIRST PLACE TROPHIES FORECAST COMM R/E SVC INC FORECAST HOMES FORECAST HOMES FRASURE, MICHAEL FUKUSHIMA, JUDITH GADABOUT TOURS INC GADABOUT TOURS iNC GADABOUT TOURS INC GAIL MATERIALS GAIL MATERIALS GALLOS NURSERY GARNER, CATHLEEN GOMEZ, KATIE GRA1NGER, WW GRAiNGER, WW GRAiNGER, WW GILAINGER, WW HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO HABID, SIHAM HAKIMI, SUSAN HARDY, BRADLEY HAVEN BUILDiNG MATERIALS HCS CUTLER STEEL CO HIGH LIGHT ELECTRIC INC. HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC HOLT'S AUTO ELECTRIC INC HOLT'S AUTO ELECTRIC INC HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Amount 118.53 77.00 20.68 17.26 17.92 21.70 47.41 2,628.74 160.65 720.00 780.00 987.00 781.20 840.00 680.00 680.00 248.28 487.26 1,000.00 1,000.00 500.00 75.00 2,265.00 400.00 200.00 200.00 495.65 495.65 2,424.38 51.84 34.00 98.97 37.91 49.94 424.51 1,172.81 4,275.74 1,996.31 779.27 -1,482.49 34.00 358.15 260.50 28.25 35.50 35.00 2,400.00 580.80 223.90 298.53 221.17 269.38 80.81 139.65 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 14 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 04/13/200 Tim~~ 14:47:5 Check No. AP-00221572 AP-00221572 AP-00221572 AP-00221572 AP-00221572 AP-00221572 AP-00221572 AP-00221572 AP-00221572 AP-00221572 AP-00221572 AP-00221572 AP-00221572 AP-00221573 AP-00221573 AP-00221573 AP-00221573 AP-00221574 AP-00221575 AP 00221575 AP 00221576 AP 00221577 AP 00221577 AP 00221577 AP 00221577 AP 00221577 AP 00221577 AP 00221577 AP 00221577 AP-00221578 AP-00221579 AP-00221580 AP-00221581 AP-00221581 AP-00221581 AP-00221582 AP-00221582 AP-00221582 AP-00221582 AP-00221583 AP-00221584 AP-00221585 AP-00221585 AP-00221587 AP-00221588 AP-00221589 AP-00221590 AP-00221590 AP-00221590 AP-00221590 AP-00221591 AP-00221593 AP-00221594 AP-00221595 Check Date 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/30/2005 through 4/12/2005 Vendor Name HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES HOSE MAN INC HOSE MAN [NC HOSE MAN INC HOSE MAN [NC HOUSE OF RUTH HOYT LUMBER CO., SM HOYT LUMBER CO., SM I-YLtRS T, CHERYL HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS [NC HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS 1NC HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS [NC HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS [NC HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS [NC INLAND EMPIRE ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP INLAND MEDIATION BOARD INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN INTERSTATE BATTERIES INTERSTATE BATTERIES INTERSTATE BATTERIES ISEC INCORPORATED ISEC INCORPORATED ISEC INCORPORATED ISEC INCORPORATED JEFFERIES, EMILY JONES, BOB KB HOME KB HOME LA ROCQUE BETTER ROOFS INC LA~E, ELIZABETH LASER TECHNOLOGY INC LETNER ROOFING CO [NC LETNER ROOFING CO [NC LETNER ROOFING CO INC LETNER ROOFING CO INC LEXIS NEXIS MATTHEW BENDER LOS ANGELES COCA COLA BTL CO LOS ANGELES FREIGHTLINER MAIN STREET SIGNS 208.27 63.54 26.89 17.76 54.26 58.90 204.02 35.72 14.75 60.32 187.27 147.11 149.77 53.21 77.04 222.95 60.11 633.00 220.74 56.58 288.50 865.98 54.87 108.86 4.95 322.71 143.19 80.88 197.35 25.00 37.50 172.80 195.55 134.45 114.73 1,588.32 -158.83 1,299.77 -129.98 170.00 2,560.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 432.00 155.00 368.81 7,198.19 -19.80 197.99 -719.82 495.00 731.18 144.08 969.75 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 15 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: · 04/13/200 TimtT~' 14:47:5 Check No. AP-00221595 AP-00221598 AP-00221599 AP-00221600 AP-00221600 AP-00221601 AP-00221602 AP-00221603 AP-00221603 AP-00221603 AP-00221603 AP-00221604 AP-00221605 AP-00221606 AP-00221607 AP-00221608 AP-00221609 AP-00221610 AP-00221610 AP-00221610 AP-00221610 AP-00221610 AP 00221610 AP 00221610 AP 00221611 AP 00221612 AP 00221613 AP 00221614 AP 00221614 AP 00221614 AP 00221614 AP 00221614 AP 00221614 AP-00221614 AP-00221614 AP-00221614 AP-00221614 AP-00221614 AP-00221614 AP-00221614 AP-00221614 AP-00221614 AP-00221614 AP-00221614 AP-00221614 AP-00221614 AP-00221614 AP-00221614 AP-00221614 AP-00221614 AP-00221614 AP-00221614 AP-00221614 AP-00221616 Check Date 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2'005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/30/2005 through 4/12/2005 Vendor Name MAIN STKEET SIGNS MAO, DAVID MARK CHRIS INC MARSHALL PLUMBING MARSHALL PLUMBING MIJAC ALARM COMPANY MITCHELL, VIVAN MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC & ELECTRONICS USA It MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC & ELECTRONICS USA 1~ MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC & ELECTRONICS USA ii' MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC & ELECTRONICS USA I~ MMASC MMASC MMASC MORRISSEY CONSTRUCTION MOUNTAIN MOTOR SPORTS MOUNTAIN VIEW GLASS AND MIRROR MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR MULBERRY EARLY LEARNING MYERS POWER PRODUCTS INC N M A DUES C/O DAVID MCDONALD NAPA AUTO PARTS NAPA AUTO PARTS NAPA AUTO PARTS NAPA AUTO PARTS NAPA AUTO PARTS NAPA AUTO PARTS NAPA AUTO PARTS NAPA AUTO PARTS NAPA AUTO PARTS NAPA AUTO PARTS NAPA AUTO PARTS NAPA AUTO PARTS NAPA AUTO PARTS NAPA AUTO PARTS NAPA AUTO PARTS NAPA AUTO PARTS NAPA AUTO PARTS NAPA AUTO PARTS NAPA AUTO PARTS NAPA AUTO PARTS NAPA AUTO PARTS NAPA AUTO PARTS NAPA AUTO PARTS NAPA AUTO PARTS NAPA AUTO PARTS NAPA AUTO PARTS NATIONAL DEFERRED Amount 969.75 137.25 38.71 580.82 -145.20 212.50 250.00 123.20 -12.32 1,540.00 -154.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 1,000.00 35.73 92.96 17.19 75.37 78.37 129.00 301.85 64.18 22.47 200.00 4,000.00 5.54 11.50 119.02 8.93 89.29 17.86 76.63 8.49 90.54 115.84 12.33 95.85 14.46 129.05 -129.05 -225.21 -129.05 -14.75 100.77 154.37 81.30 94.60 -97.31 68.60 33.91 243.62 133.06 27,022.32 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 16 Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 04/13/200 TimT~ 14:47:5 Check No. AP-00221617 AP-00221618 AP-00221619 AP-00221620 AP-00221621 AP-00221621 AP-00221621 AP-00221621 AP-00221621 AP-00221621 AP-00221621 AP-00221621 AP-00221621 AP-00221621 AP-00221621 AP-00221621 AP-00221621 AP-00221621 AP-00221621 AP-00221622 AP-00221623 AP-00221624 AP-00221625 AP-00221625 AP-00221625 AP-00221626 AP-00221627 AP-00221628 AP-00221629 AP-00221629 AP-00221630 AP-00221630 AP-00221631 AP-00221632 AP-00221632 AP-00221633 AP-00221634 AP-00221635 AP 00221636 AP 00221637 AP 00221637 AP 00221639 AP 00221639 AP 00221640 AP 00221641 AP 00221641 AP 00221641 AP 00221642 AP - 00221643 AP - 00221644 AP-00221645 AP-00221646 AP-00221647 AP-00221648 Check Date 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/30/2005 through 4/12/2005 Vendor Name NATIONS RENT NAVARRO, GUADALUPE NAZIH 1NC NEVIS CUCAMONGA LLC OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OMNITRANS OMPHROY, MONICA OPEN APPS OTT, LAURA OTT, LAURA OTT, LAURA OWEN ELECTRIC PAPER RECYCLING 8: SHREDDING SPECIALIST PEP BOYS PETES ROAD SERVICE INC PETES ROAD SERVICE INC PIERRE SPRINKLER & LANDSCAPE PIERRE SPRINKLER & LANDSCAPE PIONEER MANUFAC~IRING POMA DISTRIBUTING CO POMA DISTRIBUTING CO POMONA BASEBALL LEAGUE POMONA PRINT STOP POWER PLUS PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC PREFERRED CEILINGS INC PREFERRED CEILINGS INC PROMOTIONS TEES & MORE PROMOTIONS TEES & MORE PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY QUAKES COMMUNITY FOUNDATION QUAKES COMMUNITY FOUNDATION QUAKES COMMUNITY FOUNDATION QUICK, MARCIA QUINONES, MARISELA QUINTANA, ZITA R AND R AUTOMOTIVE R C BASEBALL RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMME! RANCHO SCREEN PRINT AND EMBROIDERY Amount 130.34 220.00 1,812.60 1,000.00 30.29 813.22 100.26 25.95 350.66 292.36 9.79 58.54 19.38 28.62 117.30 83.59 139.30 28.62 1,208.37 125.00 250.00 1,008.37 342.00 123.50 99.00 19.83 160.00 13.62 257.54 198.21 11,851.21 -1,185.12 41.50 959.85 13,079.22 180.00 85.66 25.00 143.01 264.41 -26.44 556.14 749.35 7.00 5,000.00 11,125.00 5,000.00 70.00 24.00 193.00 120.78 289.00 35.00 49.57 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 17 Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 04/13/200 TimTq ' 14:;~7~5 Check No. AP-00221649 · AP-00221650 AP-00221651 AP-00221652 AP-00221653 AP-00221654 AP-00221654 AP-00221654 AP-00221654 AP-00221654 AP-00221654 AP-00221654 AP-00221654 AP-00221655 AP-00221656 AP-00221656 AP-00221657 AP-00221658 AP-00221659 AP-00221660 AP-00221660 AP-00221661 AP-00221661 AP-00221661 AP-00221661 AP-00221662 AP-00221663 AP 00221663 AP 00221663 AP 00221664 AP 00221665 AP 00221666 AP 00221667 AP 00221668 AP 00221668 AP 00221668 AP 00221668 AP 00221668 AP 00221668 AP 00221668 AP-00221668 AP-00221668 AP-00221668 AP-00221669 AP-00221670 AP-00221671 AP-00221672 AP-00221674 AP-00221674 AP-00221674 AP-00221674 AP-00221674 AP-00221674 AP-00221678 Check Date. 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/30/2005 through 4/12/2005 Vendor Name RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE REINHARDTSEN, DEBRA REXEL CALCON RIVERSIDE CO DEPT CHILD SUPPORT RIVERSIDE CO DEPT CHILD SUPPORT ROBLES SR RAUL P ROBLES SR PAUL P ROBLES SR PAUL P ROBLES SR PAUL P ROBLES SR PAUL P ROBLES SR RAUL P ROBLES SR RAUL P ROBLES SR, PAUL P ROTARY CORPORATION SAN ANTONIO MATERIALS SAN ANTONIO MATERIALS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY OFFICE OF ASSES5 SAN BERNARDINO CTY CHILD SUPPORT PAYM SAN BERNARDINO, CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CITY OF SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM CO INC SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM CO INC SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM CO INC SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM CO INC SCOTT, DIANA SENECHAL, CALVIN SENECHAL, CALVIN SENECHAL, CALVIN SEQUEL CONTRACTORS INC SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES SIERRA WHOLESALE HARDWARE INC SIGN SHOP, THE SIMPLOT PARTNERS SIMPLOT PARTNERS SIMPLOT PARTNERS SIMPLOT PARTNERS SIMPLOT PARTNERS SIMPLOT PARTNERS SIMPLOT PARTNERS SIMPLOT PARTNERS SIMPLOT PARTNERS SIMPLOT PARTNERS SLJ PRO AUDIO SERVICES SLUKA, SUSAN SLUKA, SUSAN SMART AND FINAL SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON Amount 5.23 282.50 537.68 250.00 226.00 60.00 120.00 70.00 100.00 185.00 85.00 60.00 130.00 322.52 194.60 134.47 72.00 825.58 213.50 600.00 600.00 613.35 376.30 297.37 371.71 250.00 262.50 66.50 94.00 136,810.45 305.18 888.94 140.08 200.00 100.00 297.27 700.00 400.00 100.00 2,279.45 4,419.80 2,067.25 550.00 245.00 187.42 500.00 43.58 155.26 300.00 812.50 887.50 225.00 225.00 22,428.95 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 18 Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 04/13/200 Tim~ 14:47:5 CheckNo~ AP-00221678 AP-00221678 AP-00221678 AP-00221678 AP-00221678 AP-00221678 AP-00221678 AP-00221678 AP-00221678 AP-00221678 AP-00221678 AP-00221678 AP-00221678 AP-00221678 AP-00221678 AP-00221678 AP-00221678 AP-00221678 AP-00221678 AP-00221678 AP-00221678 AP-00221678 AP-00221678 AP-00221678 AP-00221678 AP-00221678 AP-00221678 AP-00221678 AP-00221678 AP-00221678 AP-00221678 AP-00221678 AP-00221678 AP 00221678 AP 00221678 AP 00221678 AP 00221678 AP 00221678 AP 00221678 AP 00221678 AP 00221678 AP 00221678 AP 00221678 AP 00221678 AP 00221678 AP 00221678 AP 00221678 AP 00221678 AP 00221678 AP 00221678 AP-00221678 AP-00221678 AP-00221678 AP-00221678 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/30/2005 through 4/12/2005 Check Date Vendor Name Amount 4/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.64 4/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.37 4/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 471.16 4/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.00 4/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 48.49 4/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 109.89 4/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.80 4/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.14 4/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.43 4/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.00 4/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.99 4/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.14 4/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.14 4/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16:13 4/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 29.11 4/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.62 4/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 29.60 4/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 76.37 4/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 103.79 4/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 50.96 4/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.48 4/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 95.54 4/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.19 4/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 251.33 4/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 128.10 4/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 94.70 4/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 130.08 4/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.23 4/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.13 4/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13,693.63 4/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 112.41 4/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 53.98 4/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 32.78 4/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 57.07 4/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 334.85 4/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 180.32 4/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.94 4/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 80.53 4/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 92.24 4/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 78.01 4/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 235.67 4/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.73 4/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.50 4/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.50 4/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 409.60 4/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.14 4/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 119.94 4/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.06 4/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 192.37 4/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 6.04 4/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 85.13 4/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFOKNIA EDISON 2.71 4/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 142.38 4/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 529.72 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 19 Current Date: 04/13/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_KEG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Port~ait Layout Time~..- m~ 14:47:5 Check No. Check Date AP - 00221678 4/6/2005 AP - 00221678 4/6/2005 AP - 00221678 4/6/2005 AP - 00221678 4/6/2005 AP - 00221678 4/6/2005 AP - 00221678 4/6/2005 AP - 00221678 4/6/2005 AP - 00221678 4/6/2005 AP - 00221678 4/6/2005 AP - 00221678 4/6/2005 AP - 00221678 4/6/2005 AP - 00221678 4/6/2005 AP - 00221678 4/6/2005 AP - 00221678 4/6/2005 AP - 00221678 4/6/2005 AP - 00221678 4/6/2005 AP - 00221678 4/6/2005 AP - 00221678 4/6/2005 AP - 00221678 4/6/2005 AP - 00221678 4/6/2005 AP - 00221678 4/6/2005 AP - 00221678 4/6/2005 AP - 00221678 4/6/2005 AP - 00221678 4/6/2005 AP - 00221678 4/6/2005 AP - 00221678 4/6/2005 AP - 00221678 4/6/2005 AP - 00221678 4/6/2005 AP - 00221678 4/6/2005 AP - 00221678 4/6/2005 AP - 00221678 4/6/2005 AP - 00221678 4/6/2005 AP - 00221678 4/6/2005 AP- 00221678 . 4/6/2005 AP - 00221678 4/6/2005 AP - 00221678 4/6/2005 AP - 00221678 4/6/2005 AP - 00221678 4/6/2005 AP - 00221678 4/6/2005 AP - 00221678 4/6/2005 AP - 00221678 4/6/2005 AP - 00221678 4/6/2005 AP - 00221678 4/6/2005 AP - 00221678 4/6/2005 AP - 00221678 4/6/2005 AP - 00221678 4/6/2005 AP - 00221678 4/6/2005 AP - 00221678 4/6/2005 AP - 00221678 4/6/2005 AP - 00221678 4/6/2005 AP - 00221678 4/6/2005 AP - 00221679 4/6/2005 AP - 00221680 4/6/2005 AP - 00221680 4/6/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/30/2005 through 4/12/2005 Vendor Name SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC AFFAIRS ASS~ SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC AFFAIRS ASS~ Amount 31.49 123.38 90.95 29.59 124.74 16.00 18.56 112.56 142.38 763.32 121.22 47.25 157.63 22.69 22.70 140.65 16.12 15.60 16.13 50.27 150.22 102.18 173.39 264.69 16.60 70.80 14.00 125.51 27.63 32.59 14.00 16.24 14.63 14.64 16.86 16.00 15.14 16.00 16.00 15.63 15.14 90.52 15.63 15.63 15.63 15.63 70.55 15.14 84.71 3.53 16.00 851.15 45.00 45.00 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 20 Report:CK_AGENDA PEG PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Porixait Layout Current Date: 04/13/200 Tim~214:47:5 Check No. Check Date AP - 00221680 4/6/2005 AP - 00221681 4/6/2005 AP - 00221682 4/6/2005 AP - 00221683 4/6/2005 AP - 00221683 4/6/2005 AP - 00221684 4/6/2005 AP - 00221684 4/6/2005 AP - 00221684 4/6/2005 AP - 00221685 4/6/2005 AP - 00221686 4/6/2005 AP - 00221687 4/6/2005 AP - 00221687 4/6/2005 AP - 00221687 4/6/2005 AP - 00221687 4/6/2005 AP - 00221687 4/6/2005 AP - 00221688 4/6/2005 AP - 00221689 4/6/2005 AP - 00221690 4/6/2005 AP - 00221691 4/6/2005 AP - 00221692 4/6/2005 AP - 00221695 4/6/2005 AP - 00221695 4/6/2005 AP - 00221695 4/6/2005 AP - 00221696 4/6/2005 AP - 00221697 4/6/2005 AP - 00221698 4/6/2005 AP - 00221699 4/6/2005 AP - 00221699 4/6/2005 AP - 00221699 4/6/2005 AP - 00221699 4/6/2005 AP - 00221699 4/6/2005 AP - 00221699 4/6/2005 AP - 00221699 4/6/2005 AP - 00221699 4/6/2005 AP - 00221700 4/6/2005 AP - 00221701 4/6/2005 AP - 00221701 4/6/2005 AP - 00221702 4/6/2005 AP - 00221702 4/6/2005 AP - 00221702 4/6/2005 AP - 00221702 4/6/2005 AP - 00221702 4/6/2005 AP - 00221702 4/6/2005 AP - 00221702 4/6/2005 AP - 00221702 4/6/2005 AP - 00221702 4/6/2005 AP - 00221702 4/6/2005 AP - 00221702 4/6/2005 AP - 00221702 4/6/2005 AP - 00221703 4/6/2005 AP - 00221704 4/6/2005 AP - 00221705 4/6/2005 AP - 00221705 4/6/2005 AP - 00221705 4/6/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/30/2005 through 4/12/2005 Vendor Name SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC AFFAIRS ASS~ SOUTHWEST TRAFFIC SYSTEMS INC STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY STEELWORKERS OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION STEELWORKERS OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION STERLING COFFEE SERVICE STERLING COFFEE SERVICE STERLING COFFEE SERVICE STEWART, CHRISTINA STOFA, JOSEPH SUNRISE FORD SUNRISE FORD SUNRISE FORD SUNRISE FORD SUNRISE FORD SUNRISE LIFE DEVELOPMENT SUNSHINE GROWERS TANNER RECOGNITION COMPANY, O C TARGET TARGET TOMARK SPORTS INC TOMARK SPORTS INC TOMARK SPORTS INC TRAFFIC OPERATIONS INC TREASURE BAY INC TRI CHAPTER COMMITTEE TRUGREEN LANDCARE TRUGREEN LANDCARE TRUGREEN LANDCARE TRUGREEN LANDCARE TRUGREEN LANDCARE TRUGREEN LANDCARE TRUGREEN LANDCARE TRUGREEN LANDCARE TURCH AND ASSOCIATES, DAVID LIMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR UNITED WAY UPS UPS LIPS Amount 45.00 500.00 468.63 247.89 708.33 238.33 127.93 82.18 45.00 15.00 229.52 107.08 423.66 17.65 327.53 5,083.05 96.98 1,150.72 36.22 28.56 420.23 128.22 58.19 11,239.83 238.94 100.00 22,784.77 62,920.60 18,964.86 50.37 15,983.20 14,804.41 603.34 861.84 8,000.00 40.00 1,932.00 40.91 24.56 113.01 638.76 28.84 40.91 700.34 23.59 109.81 42.55 147.08 486.91 1,333.27 540.32 27.97 23.81 18.52 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 21 Report:CK_AGENDA KEG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 04/13/200 Tim~4:47:5 Cheek No. AP - 00221705 4/6/2005 AP - 00221705 4/6/2005 AP- 00221706 4/6/2005 AP - 00221706 4/6/2005 AP - 00221706 4/6/2005 AP - 00221706 4/6/2005 AP - 00221706 4/6/2005 AP - 00221706 4/6/2005 AP - 00221706 4/6/2005 AP - 00221706 4/6/2005 AP - 00221706 4/6/2005 AP - 00221706 4/6/2005 AP - 00221706 4/6/2005 AP - 00221706 4/6/2005 AP - 00221706 4/6/2005 AP - 00221706 4/6/2005 AP - 00221706 4/6/2005 AP - 00221706 4/6/2005 AP - 00221706 4/6/2005 AP - 00221706 4/6/2005 AP - 00221706 4/6/2005 AP - 00221706 4/6/2005 AP - 00221706 4/6/2005 AP - 00221706 4/6/2005 AP - 00221706 4/6/2005 AP - 00221706 4/6/2005 AP - 00221706 4/6/2005 AP - 00221706 4/6/2005 AP - 00221706 4/6/2005 AP - 00221706 4/6/2005 AP - 00221706 4/6/2005 AP - 00221706 4/6/2005 AP - 00221706 4/6/2005 AP - 00221707 4/6/2005 AP - 00221708 4/6/2005 AP - 00221708 4/6/2005 AP - 00221708 4/6/2005 AP - 00221708 4/6/2005 AP - 00221708 4/6/2005 AP - 00221708 4/6/2005 AP - 00221708 4/6/2005 AP - 00221709 4/6/2005 AP - 00221710 4/6/2005 AP - 00221710 4/6/2005 AP - 00221710 4/6/2005 AP - 00221710 4/6/2005 AP - 00221710 4/6/2005 AP - 00221711 4/6/2005 AP - 00221712 4/6/2005 AP - 00221713 4/6/2005 AP - 00221713 4/6/2005 AP - 00221713 4/6/2005 AP - 00221713 4/6/2005 AP - 00221713 4/6/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/30/2005 through 4/t2/2005 Check Date Vendor Name UPS UPS VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VEKIZON VERIZON VERiZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON 'VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VIGILANCE, TERRENCE VISTA PAINT VISTA PAINT VISTA PA1NT VISTA PAINT VISTA PAINT VISTA PAINT VISTA PAINT VOLM, LIZA WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO WARD, DESIREE WARREN & CO INC, CARL WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY Amount 30.01 29.06 59.62 29.47 30.55 465.02 29.08 28.36 89.30 32.46 28.06 56.21 28.95 28.34 89.30 386.96 92.01 149.18 29.07 138.40 110.66 29.18 38.42 38.42 92.01 89.30 92.01 92.01 90.30 106.35 86.02 32.05 28.27 400.00 543.98 119.93 200.00 300.00 303.37 72.58 72.59 112.50 166.49 521.47 273.32 86.65 65.85 452.50 756.64 38.62 283.12 -167.40 109.34 109.34 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 22 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 04/13/200 Ti~. 4:47:5 Check No. AP 00221713 AP 00221713 AP 00221713 AP 00221713 AP 00221713 AP 00221713 AP-00221713 AP-00221713 AP-00221713 AP-00221713 AP-00221713 AP 00221713 AP 00221713 AP 00221713 AP 00221713 AP 00221714 AP 00221715 AP 00221716 AP 00221717 AP-00221718 AP-00221719 AP-00221720 AP-00221721 AP-00221721 AP-00221722 AP-00221722 AP-00221722 AP-00221722 AP-00221723 AP-00221724 AP-00221726 AP-00221726 AP-00221726 AP-00221726 AP-00221726 AP-00221726 AP-00221727 Check Date 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/6/2005 4/11/2005 4/11/2005 4/11/2005 4/11/2005 4/11/2005 4/11/2005 4/7/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/30/2005 through 4/12/2005 Vendor Name WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WA)LIE SANITARY SUPPLY WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WEST COAST NETTING WEST END FAMILY COUNSELING SERVICES WEST END MATERIAL SUPPLY WEST GROUP WESTERN CHAPTER ISA WESTON PRINGLE WILBERTON, DENISE WILLDAN ASSOCIATES WILLDAN ASSOCIATES WSA US GUARDS CO INC WSA US GUARDS CO WSA US GUARDS CO INC WSA US GUARDS CO YORK INDUSTRIES YOUNG AND ASSOCIATES TEMECULA MECHANICAL INC TEMECULA MECHANICAL INC TEMECULA MECHANICAL TEMECULA MECHANICAL INC TEMECULA MECHANICAL INC TEMECULA MECHANICAL INC SADIE CONSTRUCTION 1NC Total for Check Il) AP: Total forEntity: - 167.40 830.17 19.70 242.05 84.82 261.53 294A9 587.84 339.41 29.67 117.92 214.42 619.79 827.99 78.79 3,100.00 38,447.37 1,154.00 194.35 270.00 507.50 264.00 8,062.50 43,393.00 1,285.24 5,244.18 2,576.00 2,070.00 711.15 110.00 18,171.29 18,917.66 -189.71 -1,767.81 -1,814.61 19.78 33,426.00 1,932,809.68 1,932,809.68 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 23 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Porn'air Layout Current Date: 04/13/200 Ti~4:47:5 City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary March 31, 2005 City of Rancho Cucamonga Investments Par Market Book % of Days to YTM YTM Value Value Value Portfolio Term Maturlly 360 Equiv. 365 Equiv. Local Agency Investment Fund Certificates of DeposilJNeg. - Bank Federal Agency Issues - Coupon Treasury Securities - Coupon Investment Agreements 23,151,357.92 23,151,357.92 23,151,357.92 13.54 1 1 2.336 2.368 1,515,000.00 1,507,266.68 1,51 §,0O0,00 0.89 733 150 2.150 2.180 125,750,000.00 122,639,570.01 125,688,175.00 73.53 1,488 977 3.139 3.182 5,000,000.00 4,929,687.50 4,985,546.88 2.92 1,070 774 3.184 3.229 ? 5,6(X),0~0.09 15,600,000.00 15,600,000.00 9.13 I I 3.682 3.733 Investments 171,016,357.92 167,827,882.11 170,940,079.80 100.00% 1,132 743 3.072 3.116 Cash and Accrued Interest Passbook/Checking 136,958.48 136,958.48 136,958.48 1 I 0.493 0.500 (not included in y~eld calculations) Accrued Interest at Purchase 113 33 113.33 Subtotal 137,071.81 137,071.81 Total Cash and Investments 171,153,316.40 167,964,953.92 171,077,151.61 1,132 743 3.072 3.115 TotalEarnlngs March 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date Current Year 439,584.39 3,902,631.36 Average Dally Balance 168,660,909.25 169,318,095.65 Effective Rate of Return 3.07% 3.07% I certify that this report accurately reflects all City pooled investments and is in comformity with the investment policy adopted October 6. 2004. A copy of the investment policy is available in the Administrative Services Department. The Investment Program herein sho~ provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet the next six months estimated expenditures. The month-end market values were obtained from (IDC)-Interactive Data Corporation pricing service. The attached Summa~ of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents as of the prior month's end is provided under the City official Investment Policy. The provisions of the individual bond documents govern the management of these funds. On October 21,2004 the City entered into a Investment Agreement with Aegon/Treneamedca in the amount of $15,600,000. The Investment Agreement will earn interest at 6.00% ?~r annum through June 28, 2006 to provide funding for speeific expenditures during that period. Beginning June 29, 2006 through October 21, 2009, the Investment Agreement will eam intere~ ~t 2.~'1~. The average annual rate of return over the five year period is 3.682% which is incoq~orated in the annual rate of return noted above. (.~C~ Fr0st,~'~'urer Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF_PM1) SymRsst V6.21 City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments March 31, 2005 Page 2 Average CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Local Agency Investment Fund SYS00005 00005 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND Subtotal and Average 20,735,228.89 Par Value Market Value Book Value 23,151,357.92 23,151,357.92 23,151,357.92 23,151,357.92 23,151,357.92 23,151,357.92 Stated YTM Daysto Maturity Rate Moody's 360 Maturity Date 2.368 2.336 1 Certificates of Deposit/Neg. - Bank 0605OE6Q3 1228 BANK OF AMERICA Subtotal and Average 1,515,000.00 08/27/2003 1,515,000.00 1,507,266.68 1,515,000.00 1,515,000.00 1,507,266.68 1,51 2.150 2.150 150 08/29/2005 2.150 150 Federal Agency Issues - Coupon 3136F6YQ6 1278 31331QK55 1199 31331QM79 1205 31331QN78 1207 31331Q7C5 1226 31331TFG1 1231 31339XPL2 1213 3133X1P27 1237 3133X3DX8 1247 3133X4XF3 1256 3133X5WA2 1264 3133XAR25 1277 3133XAMW4 1279 3128X1BD~ 1198 3128X1FG7 1203 3128X1DK0 1204 3128X1JD0 1208 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 02/22/2005 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 05/1 5/2003 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 06/03/2003 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 06/09/2003 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 08/1 5/2003 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 09/24/20(X3 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 12/17/2C~3 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 02/17/2004 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 02/17/2004 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 04/29/2004 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 06/10/2004 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/12/2003 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 0~/16/2003 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/19/2003 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/25/20(X3 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 07/16~2003 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 10/27/2003 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 01/29/2004 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 03/26J2004 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 03/29/2004 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 04/30/2004 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 02/16/2005 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 02/22_/2(X)5 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 05/19/2003 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 0~ FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 05/28/2003 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 06/12/2003 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 06/12/2003 2,(X30,000.00 1,978,750.00 1 ,~38,600.00 2,500,000.00 2,416,406.25 2,496,875.00 2,000,000.00 1,936,875.00 5,500,000.00 5,338,437.50 5,500,000~00 3,000,000.00 2,928,750.00 2,995,312.50 2,000,000.00 1,963,125.00 1,996,562.50 2,000,000.00 1,951,250.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 1,914,375.00 2,000,000.00 4,(X30,000.00 3,830,000.00 3,997,500.00 3,500,000.00 3,447,500.00 3,479,000.00 3,000,000.00 2,982,187.50 3,0~0,000.00 5,000,000.00 4,856,250.00 5,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 2,912,812.50 3,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 1,940,625.00 2,000,000.0e 2,000,000.00 1,923,125.00 2,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 2,914,687.50 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 2,966,250.00 3,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 1,963,750.00 2,000,000.00 5,0~0,000.00 4,900,000.00 5,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 1,936,250.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 1,949,375.00 2,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 992,187.50 1,000,000.00 1,000.000.00 990,62&00 999,750.00 5,000,000.00 4,893,450.17 4,993,750.~0 3,000,000.00 2,932,542.11 3,000,000.00 4,000,000.00 3,860,839.84 4,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 4,821,945.19 4,998,500.00 2,000,000.00 1,932.,569.89 2,000,000.00 4.000 3.970 1,057 02/22/2008 3.120 3.104 1,144 06/19/2008 3.210 3.166 1,159 66/02/2008 2.440 2.407 707 03/09Y2007 3.050 3.049 864 08/13/2007 3,375 3.374 906 09/24/2007 3.g70 3.916 1,173 0~17/200~ 3.240 3.196 1,081 03/17/200~ 3.550 3.517 1,326 11/17/2008 3.920 4.012 1,305 10/27/2008 4.000 3.945 983 12/10/2007 2.650 2.614 801 06/11/2007 2.430 2.397 714 03/16/2007 2.625 2.589 809 06/19/2007 2.450 2.417 908 09/26/2007 2.540 2.506 745 04/16/2007 4.000 3.945 1,305 1 (Y27/2008 3.355 3.310 941 10/29/~007 2.750 2.713 634 12/26/2006 3.500 3.452 1,001 12/28/2007 3.210 3.167 1,034 01/30/2008 4.080 4.024 1,235 06/16/200~ 4.000 3.954 1,057 02/22/2008 3.500 3.479 1,144 05/19/2008 2.500 2.466 606 11/28/2006 3.100 3.058 971 11/28Z2007 3.030 2.995 1,167 06/11/2008 2.400 2.367 801 06/11/2007 Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF_PM2) SymRelX V6.21 Federal Agency Issues - Coupon FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN FEDERAL NATL M3'G ASSN FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN Subtotal and Average 125,688,175.00 City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments March 31, 2005 Purchase Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Page 3 10/06/200G 4,000,000.00 3,938,419.80 3,997,600.00 2.800 2.782 534 09/17/2006 03/30/2004 3,000,000.00 2,953,364.67 3,000,000.00 4.000 3.945 1,459 03/30/2009 04/12/2004 1,250,000.00 1,229,137.42 1,248,750.00 3.650 3.626 1,132 05&)7/2008 04/19/2004 2,000,000.00 1,943,760.07 1,997,600.00 2.920 2.916 931 10/19/2007 04/26/2004 1,000,000.00 980,173.95 1,000,000.00 3.280 3.235 938 10P26/2007 04/29~ 5,000,000.00 4,920,480.35 5,000,000.00 3.450 3.403 941 10P29/2007 05/2zV2004 3,000,000.00 2,970,855.10 2,999,062.50 3.750 3.708 966 11F23/'2007 05/27/2003 7,000,000.00 6,776,875.00 6,996,500.00 2.500 2.479 784 05/25/2007 07/16/2003 4,000,000.00 3,861,250.00 4,000,000.00 2.500 2.466 836 07/1 6/2007 07/29/2003 4,000,000.00 3,877,500.00 3,S93,750.00 3.300 3.289 1,215 07/29/2008 12/12/2003 2,000,000.00 1,961,250.00 2,000,000.00 3.300 3.255 620 12/12/2006 00/05/2004 3,000,000.00 2,937,187.50 2,999,062.50 3.750 3.707 1,347 12/08/2008 00/16/2004 4,000,000.00 3,941,250.00 4,000,000.00 4.040 3.985 1,445 03/16/2009 04/12/2004 1,000,000.00 973,125.00 1,000,000.00 3.020 2.979 924 10/12/2007 125,750,000.00 122,639,570.01 125,688,175.00 3.139 977 Treasury Securities - Coupon g12828CG3 1271 TREASURY NOTE Subtotal and Average 06~9/2004 5,000,000.00 4,929,667.50 4,985,546.88 3.125 3.184 774 00/1,5~2007 3.184 774 Investment Agreements SYS1275 1275 AEGON / TRANSAMERICA Subtotal and Average 1 $,600,000.~0 Total and Average 168,660,909.25 10/21/2004 t5,600,000.00 15,600,000.00 15,600,000.00 3.682 15,600,000.00 15,600,000.00 15,600,000.00 3.682 1 3.682 I 171,016,357.92 167,827~82.11 170,940,079.80 3.072 743 Portfolio CITY CP Savings/Miscellaneous Accounts SYSO0180 00180 BANK OF AMERICA City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Cash March 31, 2005 Average Purchase Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value 136,958.48 136,958.48 Rate Moody's 36O Maturffy 0.500 0.493 I Page Average Balance Total Cash and Inv~-tmentss 0,00 Accrued Interest at Purchase 113.33 113.33 Subtotal 137,071.81 137,071.81 168,660,909~5 171,153,316.40 167,964,953.92 171,077,151.61 3.072 743 Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF_PM2) Sy~ V6.21 City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Activity By Type March 1,2005 through March 31, 2005 Beginning CUSIp · Investment # Issuer Balance Local Agency Investment Fund (Monthly Summary) SYS00005 00005 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND Subtotal 22,451,357.92 Stated Transaction Purchases Rate Date or Oelx~slta 2.368 Redemptions or Withdrawals 3,000,000.00 2,300,000.00 Ending Balance 3,000,000.00 2,300,000.00 23,151,357.92 Page Savings/Miscellaneous Accounts (Monthly Summary) Subtotal 136,958.48 136,958.48 Certificates of Deposit/Neg. - Bank Subtotal 1,515,000.00 Federal Agency Issues - Coupon Subtotal 125,688,175.00 125,688,175.00 Treasury Sscurlties - Coupon Investment Agreements Subtotal 15,600,000.00 Total 170,377,038.28 3,go0,O00.O0 2,300,000.00 171,077,038.28 Run Dete: 04/12/2005 - 14:10 portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF_PM3) SymRept V6~21 Re,on Vet. 5.CO City of Rancho Cucamonga Summery of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents For the Month Ended February 28, 2005 Bond Issue Assessment District No 93-1 Masi Plaza Trustee and/or Payinp~ Aeent US Bank Purchase Account Name Investment Date Imprvmnt Fund First American Treasury Obligation 8/4/1997 Imprvmnt Fund Cash N/A Reserve Fund First American Treasury Obligation 8/4/1997 Reserve Fund N/A Redemp. Fund First American Treasury Obligation 8/4/1997 Redemp. Fund Cash N/A Maturity Date N/A* NIA N/A' N/A N/A N/A Yield 0.00% N/A 0.00% N/A 0.00% N/A Cost Value 257,324.41 243,994.12 1,975.80 $ 503,294.33 PFA RFDG Rev Bonds series 1999 A (St) & 1999 B (Subord) US Bank Expense Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 Cash N/A Sub Resrv. Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 Cash N/A Sr. Resrv. Fund Fimt American Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 Cash N/A Redemption Fund Fimt American Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 Cash N/A Revenue Fund Fimt American Treasury Obligation 3/2/2000 Cash N/A Residual Fund First American Treasury Obligation 1 I16/2001 Cash N/A N/A* N/A N/A* N/A N/A' N/A N/A* N/A~ N/A* N/A N/A* N/A 0.00% NIA 1.41% N/A 1.41% N/A 0.00% N/A 0.00% N/A 1.41% N/A 583,644.24 1,096,446.43 5.06 56,099.02 $ 1,736,194.75 $ 2,239,489.08 TOTAL CASH AND INVESTMENTS WITH FISCAL AGENTS * Note: These investments are money market accounts whicfl have no stated maturity date as they may be liquidated upon demand. ~' i:~finance~Cash ~h Fiscal Agents.xls 4/12/2005 1:33 PM RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DEPARTHENT Slaff Report DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: April 20, 2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Michael TenEyck, Administrative Resources Manager APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" AND APPROVE THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE MARKETPLACE PROPERTIES AND VICTORIA GARDENS SOUTHERN PARCEL 12 KV ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION AND ONSITE SYSTEM CABLING, CONNECTIONS, EQUIPMENT PROJECT TO BE FUNDED FROM 17053035650/1485705 AN D 17053035650/1487705 (M U N ICI PAL UTILITY) RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended the City Council approve a resolution authorizing the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" and approving plans and specifications for the Marketplace Properties and Victoria Gardens Southern Parcel 12 Kv Electrical Distribution and onsite System Cabling, Connections, Equipment Project to be funded from 17053035650/1485705 and 17053035650/1487705 (Municipal Utility). BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: On August 31, 2001, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council authorized the creation and operation of a municipally owned utility for the purpose of providing various utility services. Subsequently, on August 21, 2002, the Redevelopment Agency authorized the filing of a Wholesale Distribution Access Tariff (VVDAT) Application with Southern California Edison Company for the potential provision of electric service to the Victoria Arbors development area by the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility. A critical element of the City's plans to serve this area is the construction of on-site electrical distribution system to relay energy from the City's substation and interconnection with Southern California Edison's transmission system, located at the southeast corner of Rochester Avenue and Stadium Parkway. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT APPROVAL AND AUTHORIZATION OF NOTICE INVITING BIDS FOR THE 12 KV ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM CABLING, CONNECTIONS, AND EQUIPMENT PROJECT APRIL 20, 2005 PAGE 2 Council initiated the preliminary design and final design of the on-site electrical distribution system via the approval of professional services agreements with Butsko Utility Design on March 16, 2005. The project will construct cabling, connections, and equipment to provide permanent power to Market Place Properties and Victoria Gardens southern parcel two new retail projects being developed along Day Creek Blvd. These projects are being bid as a single item in order to reduce the construction costs. The combined engineers estimate for both projects is $324,231.00. The cost of the projects, is included within the FY 2004-05 Budget. Respectfully Submitted, Willia~ O. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:MT:dlw Attachment A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE MARKETPLACE PROPERTIES AND VICTORIA GARDENS SOUTHERN PARCEL 12 KV ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION AND ONSlTE SYSTEM CABLING, CONNECTIONS, EQUIPMENT PROJECT IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for the" THE MARKETPLACE PROPERTIES AND VICTORIA GARDENS SOUTHERN PARCEL 12 KV ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION AND ONSITE SYSTEM CABLING, CONNECTIONS, EQUIPMENT PROJECT" BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY G1VEN that said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 P.M. on Tuesday, May 10, 2005, sealed bids or proposals for the" THE MARKETPLACE PROPERTIES AND VICTORIA GARDENS SOUTHERN PARCEL 12 KV ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION AND ONSITE SYSTEM CABLING, CONNECTIONS, EQUIPMENT PROJECT" in said City. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for THE MARKETPLACE PROPERTIES AND VICTORIA GARDENS SOUTHERN PARCEL 12 KV ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION AND ONSITE SYSTEM CABLING, CONNECTIONS, EQUIPMENT PROJECT." PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to paynot less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work ora similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: When unemployment in the area o f coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained fi.om the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (10%) of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Con- tractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess any and all contractors licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; including but not limited to a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) or a Specialty Class License sufficient to cover all the work to be performed by the Prime Contractor in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and roles and regulation adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code", Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the plans and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, Engineering Counter, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and payment of $35.00 (THIRTY-FWE DOLLARS), said $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS) is nonrefundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional nonreimbursable payment of$15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reject any and all bids. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this 20th day of April 2005. Questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids for "THE MARKETPLACE PROPERTIES AND VICTORIA GARDENS SOUTHERN PARCEL 12 KV ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION AND ONSlTE SYSTEM CABLING, CONNECTIONS, EQUIPMENT PROJECT" Must be submitted in writin? and may be directed to: Michael TenEyck, Administrative Resources Manager 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: (909) 477-2740, ext. 4035 FAX: (909) 477-2741 e-mail: mteneyck~ci.rancho-cuamonga.ca.us PUBLISH DATES/ADVERTISE ON: APRIL 21, 2005 AND APRIL 28, 2005 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this 20th day of April 2005. William J. Alexander, Mayor ATTEST: Debbie J. Adams, City Clerk THE CITY OF I~ANCHO ClJCAHONGA DATE: April 20, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Thomas Grahn, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR THE CHAFFEY-ISLE HOUSE REMODEL AND GARAGE/APARTMENT CONSTRUCTION, TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NOS. 12043145650-1181204 AND 26288215602. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Chaffey-lsle house remodel and garage/apartment construction. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The Chaffey-lsle House is being rehabilitated through a cooperative effort with the Etiwanda Historical Society for use as a community building/museum similar to that of the Chaffey-Garcia House. The proposed project will provide for the rehabilitation of the existing house and the construction of a garage/apartment for use by a caretaker. Rehabilitation of the house will include the selective demolition of a recent addition, and the completion of all intedor and exterior improvements. The proposed garage/apartment is a two-story unit located in the extreme northwest corner of the site. Improvements will include a first floor garage and second floor apartment unit. Design plans for the project were prepared by Robert Laird, from Architecture One; staff completed the bid specifications. The cost estimate for the completion of the rehabilitation of the Chaffey-lsle House and construction of the garage/apartment is approximately $208,000.00; this figure does not include a contingency, or costs associated with printing and advertising. The proposed project is funded from CDBG funds (Account No. 12043145650-1181204) and CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CHAFFEY-ISLE HOUSE REMODEL AND GARAGE/APARTMENT CONSTRUCTION April 20, 2005 Page 2 RDA funds (Account No. 26288215602), Legal advertising is scheduled for Tuesday, April 26, 2005, and May 3, 2005, with a bid opening at 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, May 24, 2005. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:TG:ge Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Plan Draft Resolution of Approval RESOLUTION NO. 05-''~/,~ '~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "CHAFFEY-ISLE HOUSE REMODEL AND GARAGE/APARTMENT CONSTRUCTION" IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City or Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by the City or Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for "CHAFFEY-ISLE HOUSE REMODEL AND GARAGE/APARTMENT CONSTRUCTION." BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS This project is federally financed by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (24 CFR Part 57) for the purpose of providing rehabilitation improvements to an historic structure and is subject to certain requirements including the payment of federal prevailing wages, compliance with "Section 3 - Affirmative Action Requirements," Executive Order No. 11246, and others. The aforementioned are described in the "Special Federal Provisions" section of the bid documents. Additional information pertaining to the federal requirements is on file with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Department. Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, May 24, 2005, sealed bids or proposals for the "CHAFFEY-ISLE HOUSE REMODEL AND GARAGE/APARTMENT CONSTRUCTION" in said City. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "BID FOR THE CHAFFEY-ISLE HOUSE REMODEL AND GARAGE/APARTMENT CONSTRUCTION." A mandatory job-walk meeting will be held on Thursday, May 12, 2005, at 2:00 p.m., at 7086 Etiwanda Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91739. Bidders' attendance at this meeting is a prerequisite for demonstrating an informed knowledge of project improvements. All prime Contractors are required to have a representative attend and sign in at the job-walk meeting. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION CHAFFEY-ISLE REMODEL Apdl 20, 2005 Page 2 Failure to comply with this attendance and sign-in requirement will result in the Bidder's proposal being found non-responsive to the required bid procedures. At the job-walk meeting, project improvement requirements will be explained to facilitate completion of the foundation improvements. A mandatory pre-bid meeting will be held on Tuesday, May 17, 2005, at 2:00 p.m., at Rancho Cucamonga City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. This meeting is to inform Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBE) of subcontracting and material supply opportunities. Bidders' attendance at this meeting is a prerequisite for demonstrating reasonable efforts to obtain DBE participation. All prime Contractors are required to have a representative attend and sign in at the pre-bid meeting. Failure to comply with this attendance and sign-in requirement will result in the Bidder's proposal being found non-responsive to the required bid procedures. At the pre-bid meeting, Section 3 requirements will be explained to facilitate completion of the required Section 3 documents in the bid proposal. Award of the project will be contingent on the content of these Section 3 documents. PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that this project is funded with U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development funds and that the rate of wages for each craft or type of workman or mechanic employed under this contract shall not be less than as specified under the U.S. Department of Labor General Wage Decision in the locality in which the work is to be performed as modified within ten (10) days prior to the bid opening date as required under the Davis-Bacon Act. Notwithstanding the conditions herein above, the California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, stipulates that not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for each craft of type of workman or mechanic needed to execute the contract in the locality in which the work is to be performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work as determined by the Director of Industrial Relations of the State of California shall be paid to all workmen employed. Where a discrepancy exists between the Federal and State prevailing wage rates, the policy of the California Department of Labor is to require that the higher of the two prevailing wage rates shall apply. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein before stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION CHAFFEY-ISLE REMODEL April 20, 2005 Page 3 Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public work's project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one (1) to five (5) except: When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of fifteen (15) percent in the ninety (90) days prior to the request of certificate, or When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one (1) to five (5), or When the trade can show that it is replacing at least one-thirtieth (1/30) of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one (1) apprentice to eight (8) journeymen. The Contractor. is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work herein before mentioned, for each CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION CHAFFEY-ISLE REMODEL April 20, 2005 Page 4 calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten (10) percent of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashiers' check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the Iow bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred (100) percent of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to one hundred (100) percent of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess any and all contractor licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; Including but not limited to a Class "B" License (General Building Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulati~)ns adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code," Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION CHAFFEY-ISLE REMODEL April 20, 2005 Page 5 The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk. at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Planner, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and payment of thirty-five dollars ($35.00), said thirty-five dollars ($35.00) is non-refundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional non-reimbursable payment of fifteen dollars ($15.00) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga reserves the right to reject any or all bids. Questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids for "CHAFFEY-ISLE HOUSE REMODEL AND GARAGE/APARTMENT CONSTRUCTION" may be directed to Thomas Grahn, AICP, Associate Planner. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this 20th day of April, 2005 PUBLISH DATES: April 26, and May 3, 2005 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTEDthis AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: ATTEST: William J. Alexander, Mayor Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION CHAFFEY-ISLE REMODEL April 20, 2005 Page 6 I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 20th day of April 2005. Executed this 20th day of April 2005, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk RAN CUCAMONGA F N G I N E E R I N G D E P A R ~ M E N T Staff Report DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: April 20, 2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Gary Varney, Streets Superintendent APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "CITYWIDE STREET NAME SIGN REPLACEMENT, PHASE 3" AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NUMBER 1025001-5300 AS APPROVED IN THE FY 04-05 BUDGET RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve plans and specifications for the "Citywide Street Name Sign Replacement, Phase 3" and authorize the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids" to be funded from account number 1025001-5300 as approved in the FY 04-05 budget. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On April 2, 2003, City Council approved Phase 1 of the citywide street name sign replacement program. The contractor replaced 893 street name signs from west City Limits to Hellman Avenue. On March 17, 2004, City Council approved Phase 2 of the citywide street name sign replacement program, which included the remaining County Box Blade street name signs. The contractor replaced 1,250 street name signs at 624 locations east of I-Iellman Avenue. Phase 3 of the Street Name Sign Replacement project will standardize the major arterials with the new nine inch street name sign specification of the highly retroreflective material. Major arterials scheduled for standardization are Grove Ave., Archibald Ave., Hermosa Ave., Haven Ave., Milliken Ave., Rochester Ave., Day Creek Blvd., Etiwanda Ave., East Ave., 4t~ St., Arrow Rte., Foothill Blvd., Base Line Rd., and 19th St. The new street name signs have been well received by the community and emergency response agencies. The total estimate of signs to be replaced in this phase is 304 street name signs. Engineer's estimate for Phase 3 of this project is $60,000. Respectfully submitted, City Engineer WJO:GV:ju SOLUTION NO. 3 g A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CITYWIDE STREET NAME SIGN REPLACEMENT, PHASE 3 AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council has prepared specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for the "CITYWIDE STREET NAME SIGN REPLACEMENT, PHASE 3". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council will receive at the OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK IN THE OFFICES OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ON OR BEFORE THE HOUR OF 2:00 P.M. ON MAY 17, 2005 sealed bids or proposals for "CITYWIDE STREET NAME SIGN REPLACEMENT, PHASE 3" in said City. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council, California, marked, "BID FOR CITYWIDE STREET NAME SIGN REPLACEMENT, PHASE 3." A Pre-Bid Job Walk is scheduled for May 10, 2005, at 10:00 a.m. at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Yard, 9153 Ninth Street, Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730, where bidders may present questions regarding the Bid Documents: Plans, Proposals, Specifications. THIS MEETING IS MANDATORY. Verification of attendance at the Pre-Bid Job Walk will be documented by signing in at the meeting. Any bidder not documented as being present at the Pre-Bid Job Walk will be excluded from the bid process. Resolution No. Page 2 PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the DeparOnent of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provision of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. Resolution No. Page 3 The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract, and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (10%) of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to one hundred pemcnt (100%) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess any and all contractors licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; including but not limited to an "A" (General Engineering Contractor), or "D-42" (Sign Installation), or "C-32" (Parking and Highway Improvement Contractor). In accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulation adopted pursuant thereto. Resolution No. Page 4 The Contractor, pursuant to the California Business and Professions Code, Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, will be fumished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS), said $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS) is non-refundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional non-reimbursable payment of $15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reject any and all bids. Questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids for CITYWIDE STREET NAME SIGN REPLACEMENT, PHASE 3 may be directed to: Ernest Ruiz, Maintenance Supervisor Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 477-2700, ext. 4108 (909) 477-2731, fax By order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia. Dated this 20th day of April, 2005. ADVERTISE ON: April 26, 2005 and May 3, 2005 TH CITY ~ANCHO CUCAHONGA S tffReport DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: April 20, 2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Maria E, Perez, Associate Engineer APPROVAL OF THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE FUEL TANK RETROFIT WITH ABOVEGROUND FUEL TANKS FOR THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA ADULT SPORTS COMPLEX TO BE FUNDED FROM CITY FUND 25 CAPITAL RESERVES. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the plans and specifications and authorize the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Board to include the City portion in the administration of the "Fuel Tank Retrofit with Aboveground Fuel Tanks for Fire Stations No's. 171, 172, 174 & 175 and City of Rancho Cucamonga Adult Sports Complex project." BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: This retrofit project will decommission underground fuel tanks and install aboveground fuel tanks at fire stations No's. 171, 172, 174 & 175 and the City of Rancho Cucamonga Adult Sports Complex. Administration of the City's portion of the contract will be performed by the Fire District .and funded from Capital Reserves. Staff has determined that the project is Categorically Exempt per Article 19, Section 15301 (a) of the CEQA guidelines. The project specifications were completed by staff and approved by the City Engineer. The Engineer's estimate is $395,000 for the combined City and Fire District work including a 10% contingency and costs for printing and materials testing. The portion to be funded from Capital Reserves is estimated at $70,000. Legal advertising is scheduled for April 26 and May 3, 2005, with a bid opening at 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, May 24, 2004, unless extended by Addenda. Res~p_e..9~ully submitted, City Engineer WJO:MEP: Attachments: Vicinity Map STATION 171 6627 AMETHYST AVE. STATION 175 11108 BANYAN ST. WILS[ 8TH ST 6TH ST BNSF RR STATION 172 9612 SAN BERNARDINO RD. 4TH ST ONTARIO C LIMIT ADULT SPORTS COMPLEX STATION 174 11297 JERSEY BLVD. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA VICINITY MAP - FUEL TANK RETROFIT for FIRE STATIONS 171, 17g, 174 and 175 and ADULT SPORTS COMPLEX R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Staff Report DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: April 20, 2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Maria E. Perez, Associate Engineer APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE iNVITING BIDS" FOR THE GROVE AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM 8TM STREET TO ARROW ROUTE TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NOS. 11803035650/1472180-0 AND 12083035650/1472208-0 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommen, ds that the City Council approve the plans and specifications for the Grove Avenue Street Improvements from 8th Street to Arrow route, and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids." BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS This project will improve pavement and provide for four driving lanes and a two way left turn lane from Arrow Route to the south city limit. It completes Grove Avenue Improvements. Phase 1, from Foothill Boulevard to Arrow Route, was constructed last fiscal year. The project will be funded from Senate Bill 325 Funds (SB 325 - Account No. 11803035650/1472180-0) and Transportation Enhancement Act Funds (TEA 21 - Account No. 12083035650/1472208-0). Staff has determined that the project is Categorically Exempt per Article 19, Section 15301 (c) of the CEQA guidelines. The project plans and specifications have been completed and approved by the City Engineer. The Engineer's estimate is $447,000, including a 10% contingency, plus an additional $22,300 required for Construction Administration, which includes advertising, CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Grove Avenue Street Improvements April 20, 2005 Page 2 printing, materials testing and survey. Legal advertising is scheduled for April 26, 2005 and May 3, 2005, with a bid opening at 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, May 17, 2005. Respectfully submitted, City Engineer WJO:MEP Attachments: Vicinity Map and Resolution VICINITY MAP GROVE AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM 8TH ST. TO ARROW RTE. AND SAN BERNARDINO RD. CROSS GUTTER FROM GROVE AVE. TO APPROX. 100' E/O GROVE AVE. PROJECT LOCATION Almond Rd -- I Banyan S 19th ~ Av Route Rt 4th St .0.. _F. _r e~_e..~w.,a y A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR "THE GROVE AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM 8TM STREET TO ARROW ROUTE" IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for the "THE GROVE AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM 8TM STREET TO ARROW ROUTE". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSAL'S" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, May 17, 2005, sealed bids or proposals for the "THE GROVE AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM 8TM STREET TO ARROW ROUTE". Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "THE GROVE AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM 8TM STREET TO ARROW ROUTE". PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles I and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than RESOLUTION NO. April 20, 2005 Page 2 the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein before stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public work's project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the pertormance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or RESOLUTION NO. April 20, 2005 Page 3 journeymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work herein before mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least 10% of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashiers' check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the Iow bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be 100% of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to 100% of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done RESOLUTION NO. April 20, 2005 Page 4 thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued bythe City of Rancho Cucamonga. On the date and at the time of the submittal of the Bidder's Proposal the Prime Contractor shall possess any and all contractor licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; Including but not limited to a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) or a combination of Specialty Class "C" licenses sufficient to cover all the work to be performed by the Prime Contractor in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code," Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, Engineering Counter, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and payment of $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS), said $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS) is non refundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional non- reimbursable payment of $15.00 FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the 'cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga reserves the right to reject any or all bids. RESOLUTION NO. April 20, 2005 Page 5 Questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids for the "THE GROVE AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM 8TM STREET TO ARROW ROUTE" may be directed to: Maria E. Perez, Associate Engineer at (909) 477-2740, ext. 4036. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this 20th day of April, 2005 Publish Dates: April 26, 2005 and May 3, 2005 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this 20th day of April, 2005. ATTEST: William J. Alexander, Mayor Debra J. Adams, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby cer[ify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 20th day of April, 2005. Executed this 20th day of April, 2005, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk ADVERTISE ON: April 26, 2005 and May 3, 2005 R A hi CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Staff Report DATE: April 20, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: BY: SUBJECT: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Jerry A. Dyer, Senior Civil Engineer /~J // APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "RENOVATION OF TVVO BASEBALL FIELDS AT RED HILL COMMUNITY PARK" AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" TO BE FUNDED FROM PARK DEVELOPMENT FUNDS ACCOUNT NUMBER 11203055650/1222120-0 AS APPROVED IN THE FY 2004/05 BUDGET RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve plans and specifications for the "Renovation of two Baseball Fields at Red Hill Community Park" and authorize the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids" to be funded from Park Development Funds account number 11203055650/1222120-0 as approved in the FY 2004/05 budget. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The two baseball fields have been in use now for eighteen years and have not had any major renovation work done since the opening of the park. The playing surface grade has deteriorated over the years and does not drain properly during periods of rainy weather. The fields are in need of being shut down for a short period, surveyed, regraded and resodded at the infield/outfield interface. Last fiscal year Council authorized this budgeted line item. The renovation period has been coordinated with the Community Services Staff. Engineering Staff has developed plans and specifications for the project and is now ready to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids". Staff has determined that the project is Categorically Exempt per Article19, Section 15301 (d) of the CEQA guidelines. Dan Guerra & Associates completed the project plans and the specifications approved by the City Engineer. The Engineer's estimate is $45,000 including a 10% contingency and $200 for printing services. Legal advertising is scheduled for April 26 and May 3, a pre-bid job walk CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Renovation of Baseball Fields at Red Hill Community Park April 20, 2005 Page 2 scheduled for May 10 at 10:00 a.m., and bid opening at 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, May 17, 2005, unless extended by Addenda. Respectfully submitted, Willia~ J. O Nell City Engineer WJO:JAD Attachments: Vicinity Map and Resolution '~ ONTARIO CITY LIMIT ~ PROJECT ~ LOCATION $ CITY 0F RANCH0 CUCAMONGA (~~ RI~ ~I'.T. CO~,~tll~'z'~' PAEK RRNOYATION OF T~O BA,.~.~- gw.l,D~ VICINITY MAP RESOLUTION "0. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "RENOVATION OF 'f~NO BASEBALL FIELDS AT RED HILL COMMUNITY PARK" AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council to construct cedain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council has prepared specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for the "RENOVATION OF TVVO BASEBALL FIELDS AT RED HILL COMMUNITY PARK". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council will receive at the OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK IN THE OFFICES OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ON OR BEFORE THE HOUR OF 2:00 P.M. ON TUESDAY, MAY 17, 2005 sealed bids or proposals for "RENOVATION OF TVVO BASEBALL FIELDS AT RED HILL COMMUNITY PARK" in said City. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council, California, marked, "RENOVATION OF TWO BASEBALL FIELDS AT RED HILL COMMUNITY PARK". A Non-Mandatory Pre-Bid Job Walk is scheduled for Tuesday, May 10, 2005, at 10:00 a.m. at Red Hill Community Park located at 7484 Vineyard Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730, where bidders may review the site and present questions regarding the Bid Documents: Plans, Proposals, Specifications. PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not Resolution No. April 20, 2005 Page 2 less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provision of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a cedificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or 2. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information re~ative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set Resolution No. April 20, 2005 Page $ forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (10%) of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the Iow bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess any and all contractors licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; including but not limited to a Class "A" (General Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulation adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the California Business and Professions Code, Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the Resolution No. April 20, 2005 Page 4 office of the City' Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS), said $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS) is non-refundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional non- reimbursable payment of $15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reject any and all bids. Questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids for the "RENOVATION OF TWO BASEBALL FIELDS AT RED HILL COMMUNITY PARK" may be directed to: Rex Whitney, Maintenance Superintendent Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 477-2730, ext. 4184 By order of the. City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this 20th day of April, 2005. ADVERTISE ON: April 26, 2005 and May 3, 2005 ~ A N C H O C U C A M O N G A COHMUNITY SERVICES DATE: TO: BY: SUBJECT: April 20, 2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director Joe O'Neil, City Engineer Brad Buller, City Planner Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III Karen McGuire-Emery, Senior Park Planner Dan Coleman, Principal Planner PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE RECOMMENDATION: In accordance with the City Council's request to become moro informed of park and rocreation facility issues, programs, projects and events, this roport is provided to highlight pertinent issues, projects and programs occurring in both the Community Services Department, the Park Design/Development and Maintenance Sections of Engineering and the Planning Division. This roport is provided to the City Council for informational purposes only. No action need be taken on this item. A. PARKS AND FACILITIES UPDATE Central Park: Contractor finishing door hardwaro and wall covedng installation. Working on intedor building punch lists. Continuing work on extedor monument signs and exterior finishes and furnishings. Central Park Landscape and Irrigation Project: · The final area to roceive landscape matedal is under construction. Rancho Cucamonga Cultural Center Project: · Project proceeding well. Installing mechanical, electrical and plumbing under the slab in the basement. Backfilling the south theater seat area and basement wails. Anticipate setting the Event Area steel starting on April 18th. Installing library window block wall and starting to set library steel. Mayor and Members of the City Council PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES OPDATE April 20, 2005 Victoria Arbors Park: · Continuing installation of sidewalks and monument sign. Play equipment installation is almost complete. Starting on installation of landscape material. Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail: On March 16, 2005, the SANBAG Plans and Programs Committee (which includes Mayor Pro Tern Williams) recommended approval of $954,900 in Transportation Development Act Funds (Article 3) for the segment between Archibald and Haven Avenues. Assuming SANBAG Board final approval in Apdl, it is estimated that this segment could be completed within 12 months. For the federally funded segment between Haven and Etiwanda Avenues, our environmental consultant, LSA Associates, Inc. is working on a response to Caltrans corrections to various environmental documents to obtain the federal environmental clearance. This is a crucial step that is required before we can get our allocation of the $3.7 million STE grant money for Phase I between Haven and 1200' east of Etiwanda Avenue. Staff is working on grant application under the state's Bicycle Transportation Account funding to design and construct the portion between Grove and Foothill. Staff has applied for Safe Route to School funds for the Base Line Road to Amethyst reach. The Trail Master Plan was completed and adopted by City Council on December 6, 2000. $4,000,000 in federal and state grant funds have been obtained to date. Engineering construction design plans for Phase II between Amethyst and Archibald are ready for signature and should be going out to bid soon. City applied for a time extension on our $272,000 BTA grant for Phase II in anticipation of completing construction in summer 2005. Outdoor recreation retailer REI has expressed a strong desire to support this trail project through their community service program of volunteers who do trail construction and maintenance. The Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation on October 13, 2004 approved use of their non-profit organization to become a donation collector for this important trail project. To date we have raised $606 in donations. Etiwanda Railway Station Property: The City and San Bernardino Associated Governments (property owner) have reached agreement to shame the cost of demolition of miscellaneous buildings and perform site clean up and removal of hazardous materials. Bids have been received for clean up of the property. A structural engineer has inspected the depot and is preparing a report on needed work. The Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail Master Plan identifies the station as a high priority "signature trailhead". The Engineering Department has begun using the station property for public works maintenance activities. Burglar alarms have been installed in the station building; however, there are no fire sprinklers in the building. Engineering Department has estimated it would cost approximately $253,000, including fire sprinklers, to bring station up to code for occupancy by Public Works staff. $50,000 in CDBG construction funds approved in FY2004-05, mostly for demolition of accessory structures on property. Mayor and Members of the City Council PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE April 20, 2005 Conceptual site plan and community garden plan are complete. Architerra agreed to donate their services to prepare community garden construction plans. Mayor and staff met with restaurateur who is interested in leasing Station building for an upscale steakhouse; however, before going any further, City Council policy discussion needed regarding desired uses for property. If City wishes to sublease Station, or a portion thereof, to a commercial business, then a Request for Proposals should be issued. B. COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE Senior Services: · Senior Advisory Committee will hold its next regular meeting on Monday, April 25, 9:00 a.m. at the Senior Center. Senior Companion Proqram - For over 25 years Community Senior Services, a non-profit agency, has provided much needed support for senior and their families. The Senior Companion Program is one of nine services/programs offered. This program is designed to help senior in their homes by providing transportation, grocery shopping, community information and companionship. For more information please call (909) 593-7511. Senior Help Line - The Help Line at (909) 596-1111 is a free service which will guide one through the maze of local senior services, with quick and easy information about hundreds of agencies. Sponsored by Community Senior Services. ClearView 500 Ma.qnifyinq Machine - The Senior Center recently received a ClearView 500 magnifying machine from the State of California Departm_ ent?f Rehabilitation. The machine was provided 'to the Senior Center specifically for the use by blind and visually impaired seniors and is designed to magnify any document. Users may also use this helpful tool to complete bills, write letters, read a book, or even look at photos. The machine is available for use Monday through Friday, from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Senior Gasoline Service Proqram - A unique Gasoline Pumping Program to assist Rancho Cucamonga seniors, 60 and over was introduced by the Senior Advisory Committee in 1999. Nine Rancho Cucamonga service stations have agreed to participate in this program to provide attendant gas pumping for seniors at self-service prices. This service is particularly valuable to the very old and frail as well as many senior women. The ability to operate a motor vehicle is a vital component to large segment of seniors insudng full integration into society and independent living. The program is easily administered through the Senior Center, with a faidy simple procedure for seniors to participate. Each senior, 60 years of age and above, who registers in the program will receive (1) a list of participating stations and the procedures to follow, and (2) an I.D. placard to display in their vehicles. Each participating service station will provide, upon request, refueling service to a senior driver of a vehicle that displays the placard, at a self-service price. The program operates each week Monday through Friday between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. Seniors wishing to participate in the program can register at the Senior Center to receive their I.D. placard. Mayor and Members of the City Council PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE April 20, 2005 Trips and Tours: Champions On Ice, May 1, 2005. Travel with us to the beautiful Arrowhead Pond of Anaheim to watch the best in ice entertainment! Featuring the following performers: Michelle Kwan, Irina Slutskaya, Timothy Goebel, Evgeni Plushenko, Elvis Stojko, Sasha Cohen, Victor Petrenko, Philippe Candeloro, Surya Bonaly, Rudy Galindo, Dan Hollander, Idna Grigorian, Vladimir Besedin and Oleksiy Polishchuk, Fumie Suguri, Tatiana Totmyanina and Maxim Marinin, Elena Sokolova, and Johnny Weir. Enjoy souvenirs and refreshments on your own! Cast of skaters subject to change due to injury or other unforeseen cimumstances. Cost: $96.00 per person. California Strawberry Festival, May 15, 2005. The delicious heart-shaped fruit of Oxnard is ripe and the California Strawberry Festival is ready to tempt the taste buds of Southern Californians everywhere. One of the nation's most popular weekend celebrations, the event is held May 14th and 15th and pays tasty tribute to the luscious fruit garnered'from the City's bountiful 6,600 berry acres. Presented by the California Strawberry Festival Committee, the multi-faceted event serves up a menu of delectable strawberry delights from strawberry pizza and shortcake to chocolate dipped and more, along with non-stop entertainment, and participatory activities for berry lovers of all ages. Cost: $34.00 per person. Human Services: On a monthly basis, free health assessments are conducted at the Senior Center by nurses from the San Bemardino County Department of Public Health to individuals 60 years and older. The health assessment includes: a health history, pulse, blood pressure, height, weight, hemoglobin and blood sugar check. Counseling and referrals were also available. The next free health screening will be held on Tuesday, May 10, 2005, from 9:00 a.m.-12:00 p.m., at the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center. USDA Food Commodities: The San Bernardino County Food Bank, along with the City of Rancho Cucamonga, distributes surplus food on the first Monday of every month to eligible residents at the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center. Eligibility is based on income and the size of the household. Distribution begins at 1:30 pm on a first come, first served basis. There is a homebound delivery program for the physically disabled. Proof of residency and income are required. The next distribution date is scheduled for May 2nd. Home Maintenance Services: The Oldtimers Foundation provides seniors with an on-going home maintenance service. Services include minor plumbing, electrical and carpentry repairs. For more information, call the Oldtimers Foundation at (909) 822-4493. Our Senior Center is sponsoring Operation Streteqic Support. Interested community members can help supply our military's deployed Armed Forces with items they miss everyday such as grooming aids, letters, magazines, newspaper clippings, videos, games, non-perishable foods, phone cards, etc. If you are interested in donating to our nations heroes, please call (909) 477-2780, for more information. Wellness Fair: Come join the fun in the 4th annual Rancho Cucamonga Community Collaborative Wellness Fair. This informative fair will offer a variety of health, safety and educational resources for all ages. The event will be held on Saturday, April 30, 2005, from 10:00 a.m. until 2:00 p.m., at the Rancho San Antonio Medical Center, 7777 Milliken Avenue, in Rancho Cucamonga. All services and refreshments will be provided free of charge. Mayor and Members of the City Council PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE April 20, 2005 Free Income Tax Preparation: The City of Rancho Cucamonga and the American Association of Retired Persons (AARP) are providing free Federal and State income tax assistance to those of Iow to moderate incomes. The tax consultants are AARP volunteers that have passed the IRS and State exams. No appointments are necessary. Participants will be assisted on a first come, first served basis at the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center on Tuesdays and Thursdays from 9:00 a.m.-12:30 p.m. Those interested in receiving assistance should bring the following items with them: Copy of last year's Federal and State tax re'turn. W-2 and 1099 forms showing all sources of income. Sale of property and escrow papers, if applicable. Proof of any expenses that might qualify as deductions. Mini-Resource Directory: The Human Services Division has created a Rancho Cucamonga Community Services Mini-Resource Guide for the Inland Empire. The following programs/services are included: Abuse & Domestic Violence, Addiction Treatment, Anti- Gang Programs, Basic Needs & Emergency Assistance, Children & Youth, Consumer Information, Counseling & Mental Health, Education & Literacy, Employment & Volunteering, Family Planning & Parenting, Health & Medical Services, Hotlines, Housing, Legal Assistance and Senior Services. Mini-resource guides will be available at all City facilities starting in March. Volunteer Services: The table below summarizes the Community Services Department vo unteer usa.qe for the month of February 2005, and the totals from September through February 2005: Month: February 2005 September-February 2005 #of #of #of #of Division Volunteers Hours SValue Volunteers Hours $ Value Senior Services 66 712 9,968 320 3,938 55,13; Human Services 26 92 1,288 236 811 11,35z Sports 170 3,384 47,376 791 13,808 193,312 Special Events 0 C (] 85 371 5,194 =erforming Arts 8 21Zl 2,996 47 304 4,256 reens 40 232 3,26~ 332 1,774 24,836 ~'outh Programs 0 £ £ 3 82 1,148 ~.dministration 5 1 .~ 210 3(~ 90 1,260 Totals 315 4,650 65,100 1,84Z 21,178 296,492 Based upon rate of $14/hour. Teens: The table below and on the next page summarizes teen pm,qram attendance for the month of March 2005: Program Teen Center Homework Room Attendance I March 2005 598 Closed for repairs Mayor and Members of the City Council PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE April 20, 2005 Program Attendance / March 2005 TRAC - Babysitting 94 participants; 17 volunteers TRAC - Monthly activities 33 participants Spruce Skate Park 779 Teen Connection 39 Career Expo 2,100 The Spruce Skate Park - Staff meets with teens using the facility on the second Thursday of the month. Items discussed generally include: park issues, new safety information, laws and upcoming major events in other cities. Our power point safety assembly program in four local elementary schools began during the month of March. Staff is awaiting the installation of cable in the Teen Center Homework Room. Once we get cabled into the system we will once again be able to offer Intemet service to ,the teens. We are also expecting down-streamed computers from City Hall once Central Park opens. Staff is hopeful that once new computers and Intemet service are installed, teens will spend more time doing school projects in the Teen Center Homework Room. During the month of March, Teen Recreation Activity Club (TRAC) members helped the less fortunate by distributing collected food items to Our Lady of Mount Carmel Church in Claremont. In addition, TRAC member were kept busy during the month helping out at our Night on the Town Babysitting Program. Lastly, TRAC members provided a snack bar at the teen Spring Fling Fiesta dance at the Family Sports Center on Apdl 2nd. Teen Connection is providing volunteer opportunities for high school students in need of community service projects for graduation. Staff, continues to serve these students by making every effort to place them in a Community Services Department program. Some of the volunteer opportunities that teens helped out with this past month included: The Career Fair, the Spring Fling Fiesta dance and the City's Track Meet. Upcoming opportunities for teens include: Central Park Grand Opening, Mobile Recreation Birthday Bash, The Wellness Fair and the Cinco de Mayo celebration. The Sixth Annual Career Expo took place on Thursday, March 17th at the RC Family Sports Center from 6:30pm to 8:30pm. Over 60 businesses and career colleges participated in the Fair and over 2,100 teens and their parents attended. REAL (Rancho Cucamonqa, Etiwanda, Alta Loma, Los Osos) Hi.qh School Advisory Committee continues to meet monthly to plan and develop new programming for high school students. The committee anticipates having some really fun and exciting activities planned for summer. Youth Activities: · Playschool registration for our winter session is currently at 830 students in 50 classes. Waiting lists still exist for some of our classes. March's attendance was 14,472. Youngsters participating in the Mobile Recreation Program, "Fun on the Run" cannot wait to do all the fun games and crafts that have been planned for each park. Two hundred and two (202) children attended our Mobile Recreation program during the month of March. The table on the next page illustrates our park locations and program timeframe dudng the spdng (April 4th through June 10th) session. Mayor and Members of the City Council PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE April 20, 2005 Weekday Park Location Program Time Monday Bear Gulch Park 2:30 pm - 5:00 Dm Tuesday Hermosa Park 2:30 pm - 5:00 pm Wednesday Old Town Park 2:30 pm - 5:00 pm Thursday Ellena Park 2:30 pm - 5:00 pm Friday Windrows Park 2:30 pm - 5:00 pm Lewis Partnership: Kids Club operates Monday through Friday from 2:30p.m.until 4:30pm at Del Mar Apartments, Terra Vista, Evergreen and Carmel on alternating days of the week. Attendance is very strong totaling in the amount of 332 children. The Lewis Teen Center operates Monday through Friday at Terra Vista Syc.amore Terrace Apartments from 2:30 p.m. until 4:30pm. The Center serviced 266 teens during the month of March. The Lewis Apartment Communities will no longer be providing their Teen Center in their apartment communities. The official last day of their service was on April 8th, when Lewis held a farewell party for participants. Youth Sports: · The table below summarizes youth sports activities for the reporting period: Activity # Participants Age/Gender # Teams Pee Wee Soccer 250 3-5/boys & ~lirls 25 Youth Basketball Camp 35 8-14/boys & girls N/A Youth Track and Field - Practice 115 8-14/boys & girls N/A Youth Track and Field - Meet 150 .... 8-14/boys & girls N/A Youth Volleyball 65 8-14/boys & girls 8 Cucamonga Middle School - 35 6-13/boys & girls N/A Youth Sports Camp Cucamonga Middle School 20 8-adult N/A (CMS) Judo Cucamonga Middle School 64 8-14/boys & girls 8 (CMS) Youth Basketball Practice RC Family Sports Center: · The table below provides drop-in/open play participation at the Center for the reporting period: Activity # Participants Adult Basketball 811 Youth Basketball 1,413 Adult Racquetball 486 Youth Racquetball 95 Adult Volleyball 31 Youth Volleyball 31 Jazzercise 1,120 Mayor and Members of the City Council PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE April 20, 2005 · The table below summarizes organized Adult Activity at the Sports Center during the reporting pedod: Activity Racquetball Basketball (full court) Basketball (3-on-3) # Participants 20 200 6O Age/Gender Adult/Male & Females Adult/Males # Teams N/A 20 Adult/Males 8 Adult Sports: · The table below summarizes adult sport activities at the Epicenter for the reporting period: Activity # Participants # Teams Gender Softball 2,304 144 Males/Females Tennis 25 N/A Males/Females · There are five (5) adult softball tournaments scheduled for the month of April at the Epicenter and Adult Sports Park, Non-Profit Sports Organizations: · The Sports Advisory Committee's next meeting will be on Apd113, 2005. At this meeting the fall (August 1, 2005 - January 31, 2006) field request forms will be due. Special Events: We are currently in the planning stages for the Central Park Grand Openinq. We will be conducting two dbbon cutting ceremonies; one for the James L. Brulte Senior Center and the other for the Goldy S. Lewis Community Center. This long awaited event will take place this spring. North Town Housing Development Corporation and the City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Services Department will sponsor our annual Cinco de Mayo celebration again this year. The event will be held at Old Town Park on May 7, 2005 from 12:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. Entertainment, food booths, face painting, game booths, pony rides, inflatable rides and activities and much more will all be part of this fun-filled community event. Other events we are currently in the creating and planning process for include: Concerts in the Park, Movies in the Park and our annual 4th of July Fireworks Celebration at the Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter. Cultural and Performing Arts: Since the start of the James V. Curatalo Performin,q Arts Memodal Scholarship Fund in the spring of 2004, eight (8) youth have been awarded scholarships in the amount of $200 each to use toward performing arts classes and programs offered through the City's Community Services Department. Seven girls and one boy between the ages of 9 and 17 years of age have participated in classes and programs funded with their scholarship award including our Creative Camp program and last summer's community theatre production of "The Music Man" as well as Teen Theatre, Beginning Acting, Children's Chorus and Youth Theatre. Each quarter local youth can apply for a scholarship. Once awarded scholarship funds ara available to them to use for up 12 months, or until their funds are depleted, in performing Mayor and Members of the City Council PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE April 20, 2005 arts programs of their choosing. The James V. Curatalo Performing Arts Memodal Scholarship Fund will provide over 30 scholarships to youth between Spring 2004 and Summer 2007. What is currently known as the Mission Room at the existing RC Senior Center will soon be temporary transformed into a new performance space, compete with theatre sets, lights, and sound equipment, all with the purpose of presenting live performances at the facility as it takes on the new identity of the RC Theatre Arts Center. The first show to be presented in the new theatrical space is "The World Goes Round," a musical revue featuring 14 adult performers from the local area along with four talented musicians who comprise a live combo to accompany the dynamite singers. The show opened on Friday, April 15th and plays weekends through April 23rd. Tickets are $10 for the show, which features groat music from the classic Broadway productions of Chicago, Cabaret, Kiss of the Spider Woman and The Rink, among many others. This summer's community theatre presentation will be the beloved and well-known tale of "Cinderella", with music by Richard Rodgers and lyrics & book by Oscar Hammerstein II. This production will be directed by Barbara Hindchsen who also directed past productions for the City including "The Music Man," "Once Upon a Mattress," "Bye, Bye Birdie," and "The Sound of Music. Auditions for Cinderella will be held on May 5 and May 7 at the RC Theatre Arts Center (the current home of the RC Senior Center) at 9791 Arrow Route. The summer musical typically includes a large cast of youth, teens and adults, with approximately 60-70 cast members from the community. The show will presented at the Los Osos High School Theatre on July 15, 16, 17, 22, 23 & 24. Parks and Facilities: · The table below provides usage information for park picnic shelters and special use facilities for the month of March 2005: Park/Shelter Attendance # Applications # Rentals Hours of Use Red Hill 1,250 20 27 85 Heritage 465 12 12 44 Milliken 209 10 11 41 Hermosa 175 7 7 28 Coyote Canyon 30 I 2 6 Courtyard* 0 0 0 0 Amphitheatre 50 I 1 6 TOTAL 2,179 51 60 210 Equestrian Participants** 5 5 19 212 Spectators: 262 * Courtyard not available due to construction. ** Equestrian participants include drop-in use. The table below and on the next page displays buildin.q rental and recreation contract class attendance numbers for the month of March 2005: Activity Program Number Attendance Lions East Rentals 59 bookings 90 Mayor and Members of the City Council PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE April 20, 2005 Activity Program Number Attendance Lions East Building 511.5 facility hours 4,748 Lions West Rentals 277 bookings 1,892 Lions West Building 498.95 facility 4,368 hours Contract Classes 300 classes 18,351 (Winter session) Staff is continuing to meet quarterly with users of the Equestrian Center to address maintenance needs and programming. Our local groups are very cooperative and supportive of the City's efforts. · Park monitors keep daily reports of activities in our parks, often helping out residents in need of assistance. Departmental/City Marketing: · Marketing efforts continue being developed for the promotion of the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center and the Promotin.q Arts and Literacy (PAL) fundraising campaign. · The January 2005, issue of the Inland Empire Magazine included a ~ page placement profiling "Success Stodes - Women in Business", featuring Performing Arts Coordinator, Susan Sluka leading the way with the Theatre Arts Academy offerings planned to begin in April and the anticipation of playhouse performances at the Victoda Gardens Cultural Center. · Central Park Bookmark #5 was released in February with #6 that is due out in April, currently at the pdnter. Distribution of the bookmarks continues through City Centers, the Library and Barnes and Noble. Staff is very appreciative for the financial contribution made by Bamhart Construction helping make this project possible. Our Special Events Division created an opportunity to test an on-line survey tool when we launched "RC Pics" off the RCpark.com website asking the community to help us "Pic" two of the motion picture features to be played during the 2005 Movies in the Park series. In a period of 3 weeks, 220 responses were received, with RC Pic'ing: '~/Villy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory" and "The Wizard of Oz" being selected as community favorites. At the March California Park & Recreation Society (CPRS) Awards & Installation Banquet, staff accepted two "Awards of Excellence" awards in the Agency Showcase in the categories of: Single Focus Brochure - "Victoria Gardens Cultural Center"; and Media Theme Campaign - "Victoria Gardens Cultural Center video". An electronic newsletter for the Cultural Center continues to be developed for distribution to interested community members. Staff is working with the City Manager's Office to launch an introductory announcement of the on-line newsletters available for recipients to sign-up to receive. · A direct mail campaiqn was launched aimed at teachers in a targeted area to solicit their opinions and feedback regarding schedules, field trip planning, measurable outcomes and ?? Mayor and Members of the City Council PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE April 20, 2005 programming for the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center. Nine thousand (9,000) mailers were distributed through the school district offices and responses to the on-line survey responses started registered within two business days of the launch. Epicenter Marketing: A mailing to approximately two hundred (200) contacts at production companies in the entertainment industry was completed, promoting the Epicenter Stadium for location shoots. Recipients were encouraged to contact staff for two tickets to enjoy a Quakes game while at the same time, scout the location site for potential filming uses. Epicenter Rentals/Activities: · The following rental activities took place at the Epicenter dudng the reporting period: Christian Okoye Foundation - Free Youth Soccer/Football Clinic - April 2, 2005 - Epicenter Soccer Fields. · Staff is working with the following applicants for upcomin.q rentals and activities: VSPI - Used Car Show and Sale - May 11-17, 2005 - Epicenter Special Event Area. Rancho Cucamonga Police Department - Memorial Ron Ives Bike Rodeo - June 4, 2005 - Epicenter Special Event Area. Inland Valley Daily Bulletin - Ail Star Practice and Game - June 6th and 8th, 2005 - Epicenter Stadium. Rancho Cucemonga High School - Graduation Ceremony- June 9, 2005 - Epicenter Stadium. National Adult Baseball Association - Champion Games - June 18, 2005 - Epicenter Stadium ....... City - 4th of July Celebration - July 4, 2005 - Epicenter Stadium and Complex. Quakes/Principal - Family Fun Fest - July 6, 2005 - Epicenter Softball Fields and Exterior Concourse Area. Christian Okoye Foundation - Youth Holiday Event and 5/10K Run - December 10, 2005 - Epicenter Parking Lots A & B and City streets. Park and Recreation Commission: · The next meetin.q of the Park and Recreation Commission will take place on Thursday, Apdl 21, 2005. The following items are scheduled to be discussed/acted upon at this meeting: Update on the Senior Advisory Committee. Update on the Sports Advisory Committee. Update on the Central Park project. Update on the Victoda Gardens Cultural Center project. Quarterly updates on Community Services Department's programming. Discussion of methods to raise public awareness of the activities and duties of the Park and Recreation Commission. Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation: · The Executive Committee and the Foundation Board of Directors will next meet on Wednesday, June 8, 2005. Agenda items for this meeting are currently being identified. Mayor and Members of the City Council PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE April 20, 2005 Respectfully submitted, ~es Director Neil City Engineer r.,~[y r-lanner '~ I:~COMMSERV~Council&BoardsICi~yCouncil~StaffReports~2OOS~update4,20. OS. doc T H E C I T Y OF I~ANCHO CIJC^~I ONG^ StaffR x DATE: TO:. FROM: April 20, 2005 Mayor, Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Julie Ungashick, Management Analyst I Dawn Haddon, Purchasing Manager APPROVAL TO AWARD THE PURCHASE OF ONE (1) JOHN DEERE 4720 COMPACT UTILITY TRACTOR, WITH OPTIONS, FROM JOHN DEERE COMPANY WITH POWERLAND EQUIPMENT OF VALLEY CENTER, CA NAMED AS THE DELIVERING DEALER, IN THE AMOUNT OF $26,852.18, BASED OFF OF AN AWARDED CMAS CONTRACT WITH JOHN DEERE NAMED AS A PRE QUALIFIED MANUFACTURE, TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NUMBER 1712001-5603 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the purchase of one (1) John Deere 4720 Compact Utility Tractor, with options, from John Deere Company with Power/and Equipment of Valley Center, CA named as the delivering in the amount of $26,852.18, based off of an awarded CMAS contract with John Deere named as the pre qualified manufacture, to be funded from account number 1712001-5603. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS; The Engineering Department requested the replacement of an existing John Deere tractor that is now thirteen years old in the 04 - 05 budget, which was approved by the City Council. John Deere has proven to be a very dependable tractor over the past 25 years they have been in service with the Public Works Department. Service and parts are readily available from a local distributor and all of the existing implements that are utilized by Parks Maintenance staff are adaptable to the John Deere 4720 that was specified to provide continuity of fleet. Engineering provided the specifications to Purchasing for the John Deere model 4720 to be soumed. Pumhasing researched pricing for the John Deere tractor and found that John Deere has been awarded a CMAS contract for lawn and agriculture equipment (contract #4-96-37-0001A) in which the City is allowed to utilize. A formal request for quote was sent to five (5) authorized John Deere dealers. Pumhasing received three (3) responses and two (2) no responses. Powerland Equipment has submitted the lowest, most responsible quote. Please see the attached abstract for details. With this in mind, Purchasing is asking that the submitted quotes based off of CMAS contract pricing be used for award. Resp, ectfu~y submitted, Joe O'lXleil City Engineer CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REMARKS: PURCHASING DIVISION ABSTRACT RECEIVED FOR: Rex Whitney Quote or Bid No.: John Deere 4720 Cor~ ~act Utilit Tractor CMAS I 2 3 4 5 Vendor Name A.A. Equipment Powerland Equip Eberhard Equip L & M Power ~,oastline Equip Contact Namel Mai Ken Sweitzer Ken Eberhard Don Denise Phone No 909-821-4564 760-749-7413 714-549-0848 951-694-6998 661-723-5613 IIFaxNo, 909-626-3767 760-749-1271 /'14-957-1111 951-676-2990 661-948-9993 Terms: n30 Terms: n30 rerms: n30 Terms: n30 Terms: n30 Del. Date: 6-12 Wee~ Del. Date: )el. Date: Del. Date: Del. Date: F.O.B: dest F.O.B: :lest F.O.B: dest F.O.B: dest F.O.B: dest Descriptlonof Itemsto quote I Qty Unit Cost Ext. Cost Unit Cost Ext. Cost Unit Cost Ext. Cost Unit Cost Ext. Cost Unit Cost Ext. Cost 4.7.~ .0...O.-S....M. F~.~..~.O_ .M..~.t...T.~!~ ............. ~. ........................................ ~P,~.9.~.0..~ ................................ .3.q,..5.~.~: .0.~. ................................. ~q,.~.~.9.:.~.~ ......................... 22.5 LL-16.1 ( R ) /27-12LL-15(F) 1 1 487 00 1,487.0( 1 487.00 ......................... E ~..N.T...W..e.).g..h. L7..O...~.B.~ ......................................... .6. ................................................ .4.9~.:.0..q ....................................... ~.0..2.: .0.~ .......................................... ~g~.~.O..O. 1~22p....G.y.a...r.d' ................................................................ ~1 ..................................... 164.00 164.0C 167.00 Telescoping Draft Link Kit 1 .......... '~'~"~ ....................................... ~'~ ................................................... ~'"" iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii ...................................................... .................................................................................................................... 257_00 ...................................................... .3...a...n..o..p.~..H(~ .u.[~!~B..K.!t' ................................. 1 71.00 71.0C 71 00 ~.~..n...o..p.y.. ................................... !. ................................ 386.00 386.0C 386.0( ~,.a..c.~.~...A..! ,a..rm.....K.!~ ...................................................... ~ ................................................... ~.5..:~0 ........................................... ~:..0.~ ............................................ .9.~.0.C 33,726.00 33,726.0C 33,742.0( ~)iscount 8 768.76 8 768.76 8 772.9; ~,dditional Dealer Discount 0.00 505.89 0.0C 24 957 2z 24 451.35 24,969.0~ 0.00 0.00 ~.a.! .e..s...T.~,~ ...................................................................................................................... .1...9..,~.:'~.~ ............................. 1,894.98 I 935.1C 0.00 0 00 '3hippin~l Cost 0.0C 0.00 0.0£ 0.00 Net Totals 26,891.4," 26,346.33 26,904.1 E 0.00 0.0( CMAS Admin Fee of 1.92% I I516'32 505.85 516.56 Prepared by KHinojos 4/13/2005 Page I H C I T Y 0 F ~ANCIIO CUCAI~O N CA Sm R po DATE: FROM: BY: SUBJECt. April 20, 2005 Mayor and Members of City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director Ingrid Y. Brace, GIS/Special Districts Supervisor APPROVAL TO PURCHASE ltP DESIGN JET 5550ps 60 INCH PLOTTER AND IBM p520 2-WAY 1.65 Gltz SMP SERVER IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF $49,000.00, AND AUTHORIZATION TO APPROPRIATE $49,000.00 FROM THE COMPUTER EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND INTO ACCOUNT NO. 1714001-5605. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council approve the purchase of an HP Design Jet 5550ps 60 inch plotter and an IBM p520 2-way 1.65 GHz SMP Server in the total amount of $49,000.00, and authorize the appropriation of $49,000.00 fi.om the Computer Equipment Replacement Fund into Account No. 1714001-5605. BACKGROUND The current plotter in the Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Division is for citywide usc. This plotter was purchased in 1998 and wc produced approximately 600 plots/maps annually. Hewlett Packard (HP) handles maintenance; however, ItP will discontinue maintenance on the plotter at the end of the current contract because of the age of the plotter and the increased number of maintenance calls. All future maintenance calls will be charged on a time and materials basis. This arrangement would not be fiscally prudent for the City as we could easily expend the total cost of the replacement plotter in approximately 2 to 3 years on maintenance charges, down time and having to utilize outside vendors during the down time. The City purchased the server five years ago to accommodate the development of Spatial Data Engine, a GIS application software. This application would allow for faster access and retrieval of GIS data citywide. Currently, the server has been maximized and there are no Page 2 April 20, 2005 slots available for additional hard drives. The server has only one Central Processing Unit (CPU) and it is not compatible with the current versions of the software application. As developmem continues within the city, and the expanded possibilities of GIS is being realized daily by staff and developers alike, the proposed server is a worthy investment that would allow GIS staff to capture data and create layers of information that would undoubtedly benefit the organization for years to come. Respectfully submitted, Lawrence I. Temple Administrative Services Director POLICE DEPARTMENT StaffRe rt DATE: TO: FROM: BY: April 20, 2005 Mayor and Members of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council Jack Lam, A.I.C.P., City Manager Pete Ortiz, Chief of Police ~)~ T.A. Nicassio, Administrative Lieutenant SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO APPROPRIATE $11,240.00 FROM THE 2003 CALIFORNIA LAW ENFORCEMENT EQUIPMENT PROGRAM (CLEEP) GRANT AWARD FUND BALANCE INTO ACCOUNT NO.1366702-5603, AND $50,760.00 FROM THE FISCAL YEAR 2003~2004 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT (LLEBG) AWARD FUND BALANCE INTO ACCOUNT NO. 1368701-5603 FOR THE PURCHASE OF TWO (2) HIGH SPEED DIGITAL LICENSE PLATE READING CAMERAS AND THREE (3) AUDIO-VIDEO RECORDING DEVICES FOR THE POLICE STATION INTERVIEW ROOMS. RECOMMENDATION: The Police Department recommends that the Council approve the appropriation $11,240.00 from the 2003 California Law Enforcement Equipment Program (CLEEP) Grant Award Fund balance into account No.1366702-5603, and $50,760.00 from the fiscal year 2003/2004 United States Department of Justice Local Law Enforcement Block Grant (LLEBG) Award fund balance into account No. 1368701-5603 for the purchase of two (2) high speed digital license plate reading cameras from Remington Elsac Law Enforcement Systems, LLC, and three (3) audio-video recording devices marketed as ADVANCED DIGITAL INTERROGATION ROOM RECORDING SYSTEM for the police station. The approximate expenditure total: $62,000 (the actual total is in the process of being calculated by the Purchasing Department). BACKGROUND: The .Mayor and Council previously approved the expenditure of the LLEBG funds in 2003. The funds have been earmarked for the Police Headquarters helipad, and the project was tentatively approved by the Department of Justice. The Police Department then received notification that the helipad project did not fall within the parameters of the grant and the award would have to be expended under grant guidelines. Additionally, the CLEEP funds were accepted for use in the purchase of technology related to law enforcement. Below is additional information regarding the equipment being requested: 1, The plate reading cameras being sought are cutting edge technology currently being used in Europe and several jurisdictions in the United States for curtailing auto thefts, assistance in criminal investigations and anti-terrorism. The system allows for the legal and unobtrusive reading of, literally, hundreds of vehicle plates a minute from a police vehicle. Currently, our investigators and officers have to tape record and videotape interviews and interrogations using hand held devices, openly. This, of course is not an optimal way to conduct interviews and more importantly, interrogations. Surreptiously recording interrogations is an effective way of documenting nuances of speech and movement in persons, which is an important part of criminal investigations. Additionally, the digital recording of interviews and interrogations is the one of the best ways to archive and store them for evidentiary purposes. The system being looked at would provide the ability to record both audio and video unobtrusively and with little or no modification to the existing building. -2- c H 0 CUCAMONGA E NGIN EI~I~IN G DIVI&IO N Repor DALE: April 20, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR 5844 EAST AVENUE, LOCATED SOUTH OF WILSON AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY JOSEPH W. BONNEVILLE RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject agreement and improvement securities for 5844 East Avenue and authorizing the Mayor to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The final Parcel Map 15802 was approved by the City Council on July 17, 2002 and part of the Improvement Certificate was to install the partial cul-de-sac for Rolling Pastures Place. The property owner, Joseph W. Bonneville, is submitting an agreement and improvement securities to guarantee the construction of the said partial cul-de-sac of Rolling Pastures Place in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond $6,500.00 Labor and Material Bond $3,250.00 Copies of the agreement and securities are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully submitted, City Engineer W JO:WV Attachment(s) PROJECT SITE ~C.~oo L.. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION N ITEM: TITLE: RESOLUTION NO. ~) 5" I ~ ] A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING iMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR 5844 EAST AVENUE WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on April 20, 2005, by Joseph W. Bonneville, as Developer, for the improvement of the public right- of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on 5844 East Avenue, south of Wilson Avenue; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Securities, which are identified in said Improvement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: 1. That said Improvement Agreement, be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and 2. That said Improvement Securities are accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney. I~ A N C H O C U C A M O N G A 1~ NGIN E EE~ING DIVI&ION StaffRe rt DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: April 20, 2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer APPROVAL OF MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES, MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I AND STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR TRACT 16567, LOCATED BE'RNEEN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND SAN BERNARDINO ROAD AND BETVVEEN HELLMAN AND MALACHITE AVENUES, SUBMITTED BY WL ROUTE 66 ASSOCIATES, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Tract Map 16567, accepting the subject agreement, securities, monumentation cash deposit and ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 for Tract Map 16567 and authorizing the Mayor to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tentative Tract Map 16567, located between Foothill Boulevard and San Bernardino Road and between Hellman and Malachite Avenues, in the Mixed Use District, was approved by the Planning Commission on April 14, 2004. This project is for a subdivision of 12.74 acres of land into 23 numbered and 9 lettered lots for the development of 18 single family detached homes 'and 138 attached condominiums with common recreation facilities and common area landscaping. The Developer, WL Route 66 Associates, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, is submitting an agreement, securities and monumentation cash deposit to guarantee the construction of the public street improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond $641,200.00 Labor and Material Bond $320,600.00 Monumentation Cash Deposit $4,000.00 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TRACT 16567 -WL ROUTE 66 ASSOCIATES, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY April20,2005 Page 2 Copies of the agreement and securities are available in the City Clerk's Office. A letter of approval has been received from Cucamonga Valley Water District. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms signed by the Developer are on file in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer W JO:WV Attachment(s) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION ITEM: TITLE: N RESOLUT,ON NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT FOR TRACT 16567 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map 16567, submitted by WL Route 66 Associates, a Delaware Limited Liability Company and consisting of a subdivision of 12.74 acres of land into 23 numbered and 9 lettered lots for the development of 18 single family detached homes and 138 attached condominiums with common recreation facilities and common area landscaping, located between Foothill Boulevard and San Bernardino Road and between Hellman and Malachite Avenues, in the Mixed Use District, was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on April 14, 2004; and WHEREAS, Tract Map 16567 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on the Tentative Tract Map; and WHEREAS, all the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the installation of public street improvements by the City Council of said City have now been met by posting the Improvement Securities and monumentation cash deposit by Laing Homes, as developer; and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES that said Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and Monumentation Cash Deposit submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and that said Tract Map 16567 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR TRACT 16567 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972," being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 1, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and WHEREAS, the previsions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of tesolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the 1972 Act related to the annexation of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the. State of California ("Article XIIID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the 'q'errito~') be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act and/or Article XIIID applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have RESOLUTION NO. TRACT 16567 -WL ROUTE 66 ASSOCIATES, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY April 20, 2005 Page 2 declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The above recitals are ali true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvements. only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. TRACT 16567 Exhibit A To Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property To Be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: WL ROUTE 66 ASSOCIATES, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY The legal description of the Properties are: (SEE ATTACHED DESCRIPTION) The above described parcels are shown on sheet A-2 attached herewith and by this reference made a part hereof. A-1 TRACT 16567 DESCRIF[ION LOTS 4 AND 5 AND THE EAST 2.00 FEET OF LOT 6 OF TRACT NO. 2076, Ilq THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 30, PAGE 29 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. EXCEPTING THE SOUTH 20.00 FEET FOR HIGHWAY PURPOSES AS GR3%NTED TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA BY DEED RECORDED JANUARY 25, 1929 IN BOOK 459, PAGE 306, OFFICIAL RECORDS. APN : 0205-141-09 & 0208141-10 PARCEL 2 .' THE SOUTH 170.00 FEET OF THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 7 WEST, SAN BERND2RDINO MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORi~IA, AS SHOWN ON THE MAp OF CUCAMONGA LANDS, AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 4, PAGE 9 OF MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTy, MORE P~tRTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST COKNER OF SAID SECTION 3; THENCE WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION, 1320.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0° 02' WEST, 180.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGIA~NING; THENCE WESTERLY PAP~ALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 3, TO A LINE WHICH IS PAP~ALLEL WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 3, ~ DISTANT THEREFROM 1988.55 FEET WEST, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES FROM THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 3; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAN BERNARDINO RO~D; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID SAN BERNARDINO ROAD TO THE WEST LINE OF THE EASTERLY 1320.00 FEET OF SAID SECTION 3; THENCE SOUTH PDd{ALLEL WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPT THE WEST 334.27 FEET THEREOF. APN: 0208-141-35 pARCEL 4~ THE WEST 334.27 FEET OF THE SOUTH 170.00 FEET OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY: DESCRIPTION ALL THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP I SOUTH, RANGE 7 WEST, SAN BEWNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN T~E COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON THE MAP OF CUCAMONGA LANDS, AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 4, PAGE 9 OF MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 3; THENCE WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION, 1320.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0Q 02' WEST 180.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE WESTERLY PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 3, TO A LINE WHICH ,IS PI~ALLEL WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 3; AND DISTANT T~REFROM 1988.55 FEET WEST, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES FROM TEE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 3; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID PAP, ALLEL LINE %"0 THE SOUTH LINE OF SAN BERNARDINO ROAD; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID SAN BERNARDINO ROAD TO THE WEST LINE OF EASTERLY 1320.00 FEET OF SAID SECTION 3; THENCE SOUTH PAKALLEL WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THE EAST 134~27 FEET. APN} 0208-141-33 PARCEL THE SOUTH 100.00 FEET OF THE WEST 330.00 FEET OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY: ALL THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, R3LNGE 7 WEST, SAN BERN~LRDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BER/~LqDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 3; THENCE WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION, 1320.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0° 02' WEST, 180.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE WESTERLY PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 3, TO A LINE W-HIC~ IS PARALLEL WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 3, AND DISTANT THEREFROM 1988.55 FEET WEST, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES FROM THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 3; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE TO THE SO~TH LINE OF SAN BERNAKDINO ROAD; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID SAN BERNARDINO ROAD TO THE WEST LINE OF THE EASTERLY 1320.00 FEET OF SAID SECTION 3; THENCE SOUTH PAR3%LLEL WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPT TEE SOUTH 170.00 FEET. APN: 0208-141-37 PA~RCEL 6 = THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 .OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RA/~GE 7 WEST, SA/~BERNARDENO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTy OF SAN BERNARDIN0, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON MAP OF CUCAMONGA LA/~DS, AS SHOWN BY DESCRIPTION MAP ON FILS IN BOOK 4, PAGE 9 OF MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COFaXiENCING AT TEE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 3; THENCE WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION, 1320.00 FEET THENCE NORTH 0o 02' WEST 350.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE WESTERLY PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 3, TO A LINE WHICH IS PARALLEL WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 3, AND DISTANT THEREFROM 1988.55 FEET WEST, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES FROM THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 3; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID P~LEL LINE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAN EERigARDINO ROAD; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID SAN BERN~G{DINO ROAD TO THE WEST LINE OF THE EASTERLY 1320.00 FEET OF SAID SECTION 3; THENCE SOUTH PAR~LEL WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE SOUTHERLY 100.00 FEET OF THE WESTERLY 330.00 FEET THEREOF, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN THE DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 4259, PAGE 295, OFFICIAL RECORDS. APN: 0208-141-38. PARCEL TEAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 7 WEST, SAN BEP~NARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESIGNATED AS "J. SMITH" ON THE FL~P OF CUCAMONGA LANDS RECORDED IN BOOK 4, PAGE 9 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COLr~YYy, MORE PARTICUI~ARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, 1100.64 FEET WEST OF THE CENTER LINE OF ARCHIBALD AVENn3E WHICH IS THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 3; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, 219.36 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 1 OF TP~ACT NO. 2076, AS SHOWN BY MAp ON FILE IN BOOK 30, PAGE 29 OF MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID COD-NTY, BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 1 ~ ITS NORTHERLY EXTENSION 654.00 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO A POINT 33.02 FEET SOUTH OF THE CENTER LINE OF SAN BERNILRDINO ROAD; THENCE SOUTH 87° 48' 50" EAST (RECORD SOUTH 87-1/2 DEGREES EAST) PARALLEL WITH THE CENTER LINE OF SAN BERNARDINO ROAD, 219.48 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 0° 01' 30" EAST, 487.62 FEET TO A POINT 140.00 FEET NORTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD; THENCE NORTH 89~ 59' 30" WEST, 165.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0° 01' 30" EAST, 140.00 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD; THENCE NORTH 89° 59' 30" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD 54.37 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM ANY PORTION LYING EASTERLY OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF THAT CERTAIN PROPERTY CON-;EYED TO V. J. LONG CORPORATION, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, BY DEED RECORDED JULY 16, 1964 IN BOOK 6191, PAGE 515, OFFICIAL RECORDS. APN: 0208-151-20- 0208-151-23 , 0208-151-21 , 0208-151-22 DESCRIPTION PARCEL 8 ~ LOT 1 OF TRACT NO. 2076, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 30, PAGE 29 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. EXCEPTING THE SOUTH 20.00 FEET FOR HIGHWAY PURPOSES AS GRANTED TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA BY DEED RECORDED JANUARy 25, 1929 IN BOOK 459, PAGE 306, OFFICIAL RECORDS. APN: 0208-141-06 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE D[S'FRICT NOS. I AND 2 CHURCH ST H£ML OCK ST SAN BERNA/ /65 7 FO0 THILL BL VD CITY OF RANCHO CUCANIO~NGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO RTATI~ ~i~ t~AI II~'~DN/Ir n Exhibit B To Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2004/2005 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I (GENERAL CITY): Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (LMD #1) represents 23.63 acres of landscape area, 41.88 acres of parks and 16.66 acres of community trails that are located at various sites throughout the City. These sites are not considered to be associated with any one particular area within the City, but rather benefit the entire City on a broader scale. As such, the parcels within this district do not represent a distinct district area as do the City's remaining LMD's. Typically parcels within this district have been annexed upon development The various sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, paseos, street trees, entry monuments, community trails and parks. The 41.88 acres of parks consist of Bear Gulch Park, East and West Beryl Park, Old Town Park, Church Street Park, Golden Oaks Park and the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I (ARTERIAL STREETS): Street Light Maintenance District No. I (SLD #1) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (LOCAL STREETS): Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (SLD #2) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally, this area encompasses the residential area of the City west of Haven Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit this area of the City. This sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets generaliy west of Haven Avenue. Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2004/2005) For Project: Tract 16567 Number of Lamps Street Lights 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L SLMD # 1 o-- 7 SLMD # 2 5 --- Community Trail Turf Non-Turf Landscaping DGSF SF SF Trees EA LMD # I 33 *Existing items installed with original project Assessment Units by District D.U. S 1 S 7 SFR 18 18 18 Multi-Family 138 138 138 L10 18 69 B-2 TRACT 16567 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2004/2005 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (GENERAL CITY): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $92.21 for the fiscal year 2004/05. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City): # of Rate Per # of Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment ' Land Use Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Reven'ue Single Parcel 757 1.0 7951 $92.21 $733,161.71 Family Multi-Family Units 7091 0.5 3570 $92.21 $329,189.70 Corem/Ind. Acre 2 1.0 2 $92.21 $184.42 TOTAL $1,062,535.83 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 16567) is: 18 SFR x 1.0 A.U. Factor x $92.21 Rate Per A.U. = $1,659.78 Annual Assessment 138 Multi-Family x 0.5 A.U. Factor x $92.21 Rate Per A.U. = $6,362.49 Annual Assessment STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I (ARTERIAL STREETS): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2004/05. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Family Parcel 21,151 1.00 21,151 $17.77 $375,853.27 Multi-Family Unit 8,540 1.00 8,540 $17.77 $151,755.80 Commercial Acre 2,380.36 2.00 4,760.72 $17.77 $84,597.99 TOTAL $612,207.06 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (Tract 16567) is: 18 SFR xl.0A.U. Factor x $17.77RatoPerA.U.= $319.86 Annual Assessment 138 Multi-Family x 0.5 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. =$2,452.26 Annual Assessment C-1 TRACT 16567 STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (LOCAL STREETS): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $39.97 for the fiscal year 2004/05. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Family Parcel 6050 1.00 6050 $39.97 $241,818.50 Multi Family Unit 24 1.00 919 $39.97 $36,732.43 Commercial Acre 19.05 2.00 19.05 $39.97 $1,522.86 Total $280,073.79 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (Tract 16567) is: 18 SFR x 1.0 A.U. Factor x $39.97 Rate Per A.U. = $719.46 Annual Assessment 138 Multi-Family x 1.0 A,U. Factor x $39.97 Rate Per A.U. = $5,515.86 Annual Assessment C-2 TRACT 16567 /~5 CERTIFICATE OF SUFFICIENCY CONSENT AND WAIVER TO ANNEXATION FOR TRACT 16567 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1, STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WILLIAM J. O"NElL, the undersigned, hereby certifies as follows: That I am the CITY ENGINEER of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. That on the 13th day of April 2005, I reviewed a Consent and Waiver to Annexation pertaining to the annexation of certain property to the Maintenance District, a copy of which is on file in the Office of the City Clerk. That I caused said Consent and Waiver to Annexation to be examined and my examination revealed that said Consent and Waiver to Annexation has been signed by the owners of all of the property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District. That said Consent and Waiver to Annexation meets the requirements of Section 22608.1 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. EXECUTED this 13th day of April 2005, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA R A N C H 0 C U C A M 0 N G A ENGINEERING DE PARTFIEN T Staff Report DATE: April 20, 2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Betty Miller, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF MAP, INTERIM BASIN MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 10 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7 FOR TRACT 15982-1, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD AND WILSON AVENUE SUBMITTED BY KB HOME GREATER LOS ANGELES RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Tract 15982-1, accepting the subject agreements and security, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 7, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreements and to cause said map 1o record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tentative Tract 15982, located at the northeast corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Wilson Avenue in the Low Residential Development District, was approved by the Planning Commission on April 9, 2003, for the division of 27.22 acres into 64 lots. The Developer, KB Home Greater Los Angeles, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements for the first of two final maps in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $1,416,000.00 Labor and Material Bond: $708,000.00 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TRACT 15982-1 - KB HOMES GREATER LOS ANGELES April 20, 2005, Page 2 Developer has also submitted a maintenance agreement for an interim basin located on the remainder parcel. The basin will be removed upon development of Tract 15982. A letter of approval has been received from Cucamonga Valley Water District. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms are on file in the City Clerk's Office. Copies of the agreement and securities are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully Submitted, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ENGINEERING DIVISION William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:BM:pjb Attachments RESOLUTION NO. ~)5" / q~/ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 15982-1, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AND INTERIM BASIN MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map 15982, submitted by Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC, and consisting of sixty-four (64) lots located at the northeast corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Wilson Avenue was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on April 9, 2003, and is in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and Local Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that Act; and WHEREAS, Tract Map No. 15982-1 is the first of two final maps of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Tract Map; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met by entry into an Improvement Agreement guaranteed by acceptable Improvement Security by KB Home Greater Los Angeles as developer; and WHEREAS, said Developer submits for approval said Tract Map offering for dedication, for street, highway and related purposes, the streets delineated thereon and the lettered lots and easements dedicated thereon for storm drain, landscape and paseo and pedestrian access purposes. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security and said Interim Basin Maintenance Agreement submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement and Interim Basin Maintenance Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest; and that the offers for dedication, easements and the final map delineating the same for said Tract Map No. 15982-1 is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. RESOL T,O A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 10 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7 FOR TRACT 15982-1 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972," being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape .Maintenance District No. 10, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance Distdct No. 7 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the 1972 Act related to the annexation of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the 'q'erritory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act and/or Article XIIID applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have lid RESOLUTION NO. TRACT 15982-1 - KB HOMES GREATER LOS ANGELES April 20, 2005 Page 2 declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvements. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. TRACT 15982-1 /// Exhibit A To Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property To Be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: KB HOMES GREATER LOS ANGELES The legal description of the Properties are: PARCEL 1 THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OFTHE SOUTHWEST ONE-QUARTER AND THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH ONE-HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER AND THAT PORTION OF THE WEST 150.00 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE-QUARTER ALL IN SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN LYING WITHIN A STRIP OF LAND 330.00 FEET WIDE, THE SIDELINES OF SAID STRIP OF LAND BEING 230.00 FEET NORTHWESTERLY AND 100.00 FEET SOUTHEASTERLY, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES FROM THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED SURVEYED REFERENCE LINE: BEGINNING AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF TH E EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 20 AND A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 130.00 FEET NORTHERLY, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES FROM THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 20, SAID POINT BEING SOUTH 0°00'32" WEST2510.50 FEET, MEASURED ALONG SAID EAST LINE FROM A FOUND TWO (2) INCH COUNTY SURVEYOR'S MONUMENT AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 20, SAID POINT ALSO BEING NORTH 0000'32'` EAST 2770.50 FEET, MEASURED ALONG SAID EAST LINE FROM A FOUND ONE (1) INCH COUNTY SURVEYOR'S MONUMENT AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 20; THENCE NORTH 89027'07'' WEST, ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE A DISTANCE OF 1147.74 FEET THENCE SOUTH 44044'00'' WEST 3684.72 FEET TO A POINT THAT IS NORTH 0°15'39" WEST 125.00 FEET FROM THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 20, BEING MEASURED ALONG THE NORTHERLY PROLONGATION OF A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 230.00 FEET EASTERLY, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES FROM THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE WEST ONE-HALF OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN; THENCE SOUTH 0°15'39" EAST ALONG SAID PROLONGATION, A DISTANCE OF 125.00 FEET TO A POINT IN SAID SOUTH LINE OF SECTION 20, SAID POINT BEING NORTH 89°24'15" WEST 1090.76 FEET, MEASU RED ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE FROM A FOUND 1 1/2 INCH COUNTY SURVEYOR'S MONUMENT AT THE SOUTH ONE-QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 20, SAID POINT ALSO BEING SOUTH 89°24'15" EAST 1550.80 FEET, MEASURED ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE FROM A FOUND 1 1/2 INCH COUNTY SURVEYOR'S MONUMENT AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 20. A-1 TRACT 15982-1 I/2. THE SIDELINES OF SAID STRIP Of LAND SHALL BE PROLONGED OR SHORTENED SO AS TO TERMINATE IN SAID SOUTH LINE OF SECTION 20. PARCEL 2 THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF THE SOUTHW EST ONE-QUARTER AND THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTH ONE-HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER ALL OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN LYING WITHIN A STRIP OF LAND 330.00 FEET WIDE, THE SIDELINES OF SAID STRIP OF LAND BEING 100.00 FEET SOUTHEASTERLY AND EASTERLY AND 230.00 FEET NORTHWESTERLY AND WESTERLY, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES FROM THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED SURVEYED REFERENCE LINE: COMMENCING AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 20 AND A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 130.00 FEET NORTHERLY, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES FROM THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 20, SAID POINT BEING SOUTH 0° 00' 32" WEST 2510,50 FEET, MEASURED ALONG SAID EAST LINE FROM A FOUND TWO (2) INCH COUNTY SURVEYOR'S MONUMENT AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 20, SAID POINT ALSO BEING NORTH 0000'32'` EAST 2770.50 FEET, MEASURED ALONG SAID EAST LINE FROM A FOUND ONE (1) INCH COUNTY SURVEYOR'S MONUMENT AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 20; THENCE NORTH 89027'07'. WEST, ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE A DISTANCE OF 1147.74 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 44044'00'' WEST 3684.72 FEET TO A POINT THAT IS NORTH 0°15'39" WEST 125.00 FEET FROM THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 20, BEING MEASURED ALONG THE NORTHERLY PROLONGATION OF A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 230.00 FEET EASTERLY, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES FROM THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE WEST ONE-HALF OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN; THENCE SOUTH 0°15'39" EAST ALONG SAID PROLONGATION, A DISTANCE OF 125.00 FEET TO A POINT IN SAID SOUTH LINE OF SECTION 20, SAID POINT BEING NORTH 89°24'15.' WEST 1090.76 FEET, MEASURED ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE FROM A FOUND 1 1/2 INCH COUNTY SURVEYOR'S MONUMENT AT THE SOUTH ONE-QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 20, SAID POINT ALSO BEING SOUTH 89°24'15.' EAST 1550.80 FEET, MEASURED ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE FROM A FOUND 1 Y2 INCH COUNTY SURVEYOR'S MONUMENT AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 20. THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID STRIP OF LAND SHALL BE PROLONGED SO AS TO TERMINATE SOUTHERLY IN THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 20. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN THE WESTERLY 150.00 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 20. PARCEL3: BEING A PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: A-2 TRACT 15982-1 COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER, NORTH 00°09'48" WEST, 217.24 FEET, TO A POINT IN THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF THE 330 FOOT WIDE STRIP OF LAND GRANTED IN FEE TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY PER DEED RECORDED APRIL 17, 1973 IN BOOK 8163, PAGE 20, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER, NORTH 00°09'48'' WEST, 360.39 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 43°56'40" EAST, 33.24 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°50'12" EAST, 268.93 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 333.00 FEET; THENCE · EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 07°02'29'', AN ARC LENGTH OF 40.92 FEET TO A POINT IN SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE, SOUTH 44°44'26'' WEST, 471.38 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. The above described parcels are shown on sheet A-4 attached herewith and by this reference made a part hereof. A-3 TRACT 15982-1 YTFrq fZlqJ~~ 7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION NORTH H 1''= 600' ITEM: Tract 15982-1 TITLE: Maintenance District Annexation / / ~ EXHIBIT: A-4 Exhibit B To Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2004/2005 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 10 (RANCHO ETIWANDA) Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 (LMD #10) represents landscape sites throughout the Rancho Etiwanda Area. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those pamels within that district. The various sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, street trees and a neighborhood park. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I (ARTERIAL STREETS) Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD #1 )) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 (NORTH ETIWANDA) Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (SLD #7) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets in what is termed the North Etiwanda area of the City. Generally, this area encompasses the area of the City east of Day Creek Channet and north of Highland Avenue within the incorporated area of the City. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the propedies within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the North Etiwanda area. B-1 TRACT 15982-1 Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2004/2005) For Project: Tract 15982-1 Number of Lamps Street Lights 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L SLMD # 1 --- 4 SLMD # 7 17 --- Community Trail Tud Non-Turf Trees Landscaping DGSF SF SF EA LMD # 10 ...... 50,945 SF 166 *Existing items installed with original project Assessment Units by District Parcel D.U. or Acres S 1 S 7 L 10 30 D.U. 30 30 30 Locations of above described additions to the Work Program are shown on sheet B-3 B-2 TRACT 15982-1 LOT O PLAOE ~ - BLACKSTONE ORR,'[ LOT LOT C Areas Annexing to Work Program for LMD 10 Tract 15982-1 Lot A Lot B Lot C Lot E* Tract 15982 Lot D* * Drainage structures, with cobble, to be maintained by Street and Storm Drain crews CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DiVISION NORTH H 1"= 400' ITEM: Tract 15982-1 TITLE: Maintenance District Annexation l/¢ EXHmlT: B-3 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2004/2005 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 10 (RANCHO ETIWANDA): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.)s $597.09 for the fiscal year 2004/05. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 (Rancho Etiwanda): Land Use Type Single # of # of Rate Per Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Family Parcel 602 1.00 602 $597.09 TOTAL The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (Tract 15982-1 ) is: $359,448.18 $359,448.18 30 Parcels x 1 A.U. Factor x $597.09 Rate Per A.U. = $17,912.70 Annual Assessment STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I (ARTERIAL STREETS): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2004/05. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Family Parcel 21,151 1.00 21,151 $17.77 $375,853.27 Multi-Family Unit 8,540 1.00 8,540 $17.77 $151,755.80 Commercial Acre 2,380.36 2.00 4,760.72 $17.77 $84,597.99 TOTAL $612,207.06 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (Tract 15982-1) is: 30 Parcels x 1 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $533.10 Annual Assessment C-1 TRACT 15982-1 STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 (NORTH ETIWANDA): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $33.32 for the fiscal year 2004/05. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Family Parcel 1804 1.00 1804 $33.32 $60,109.28 Comm/I nd Acre 5 2.00 10 $33.32 $333.20 TOTAL $60,442.48 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (Tract 15982-1 ) is: 30 Parcels x 1 A.U. Factor x $33.32 Rate Per A.U. = $999.60 Annual Assessment C-2 TRACT 15982-1 CERTIFICATE OF SUFFICIENCY CONSENT AND WAIVER TO ANNEXATION FOR TRACT 15982-1 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 10, STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND S'[REET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WILLIAM J. O"NElL, the undersigned, hereby certifies as follows: That I am the CITY ENGINEER of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. That on the 13th day of April 2005, I reviewed a Consent and Waiver to Annexation pertaining to the annexation of certain property to the Maintenance District, a copy of which is on file in the Office of the City Clerk. That I caused said Consent and Waiver to Annexation to be examined and my examination revealed that said Consent and Waiver to Annexation has been signed by the owners of all of the property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District. That said Consent and Waiver to Annexation meets the requirements of Section 22608.1 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. EXECUTED this 13th day of April 2005, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. CITY ENGINEER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA R A NC H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT SbffReport DATE: April 20, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: BY: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Cindy Hackett, Associate Engineer Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Techmclan SUBJECT: ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED AND AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,063,948.00 TO THE APPARENT LOW BIDDER, C. P. CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., AND AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF A 10% CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $106,394.80 FOR THE BASE LINE ROAD STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS AND PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM RAMONA AVENUE TO HERMOSA AVENUE, TO BE FUNDED FROM DRAINAGE FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO. 11123035650/1465112-0, MEASURE I FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO. 11763035650/1465176-0, AD 86-2 R/C DRAINAGE FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO. 16063035650/1465606-0, AND APPROPRIATE AN ADDITIONAL AMOUNT OF $260,000.00 FROM MEASURE I FUND BALANCE TO ACCOUNT NO. 11763035650/1465176-0 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $1,063,948.00 to the apparent Iow bidder, C. P. Construction Co., Inc., and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $106,394.80, for the Base Line Road Storm Drain Improvements and Pavement Rehabilitation from Ramona Avenue to Hermosa Avenue, to be funded from Drainage funds, Account No. 11123035650/1465112-0, Measure I funds, Account No. 11763035650/1465176-0, AD 86-2 R/C Drainage District funds, Account No. 16063035650/1465606-0, and appropriate an additional amount of $260,000.00 from Measure I fund balance to Account No. 11763035650/1465176~0. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on April 5, 2005, for the subject project. The Engineer's estimate was $985,000.00. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements with any CiTY COUNCIL STAFF REP©RT Re: Award Base Line Road Storm Drain Improvements and Pavement Rehabilitation from Ramona Avenue to Hermosa Avenue April 20, 2005 Page 2 irregularities to be inconsequential. Staff has completed the .required background investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents. The construction of this project is to install concrete curb and gutter, cobblestone, sidewalk, asphalt concrete pavement, asphalt rubber hot mix overlay, storm drain improvements, cold milling, adjust all utilities to new grade, sewer relocations, and water meter relocations. The contract documents call for sixty (60) working days to complete this construction. Respec~u~lly submitted, City Engine" er WJO:CH/RO:Is Attachment BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING APRIL 5, 2005 APPARENT LOI~V BIDDER Base Line Road Storm Drain Improvements and Pavement ENGINEERS COST C.P. Construction Co., Garcia Juarez Miramontes Construction Rehabilitation from Ramona Avenue to Hermnsa Avenue ESTIMATE Inc. Construction Inc. Co., Inc. UNIT[ UNITI UNITI UNIT I NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST [AMOUNT 1. I LS Clearing and Grubbing, includes allremovals, $10,000.001 $10,000.0C $12,500.001 $12,500.0(I $10,000.00[ $10,000.0C $55,000.00[ $55,000.00 2. 1050 TONS Asphalt Rubber Hot Mix Overlay, including pa $55.00[ $57,750.0(3 $105.0015110,250.00 $84.001 $88,200.0C $85.00 $89,250.00 3. 2800 SY Variable Cold Plane from0' to 0.12'Deep $1.501 $4,200.00 $3.70[ $10,360.00 $3.001 $8,400.0(3 $3.5(3 $9,800.0C 4. 6 EA Adjust Manhole to Finished Grade $300.00[ $1,800.00 $450.001 $2,700.00 $300.00 $1,800.0(3 $600.00' $3,600.0C 5. 13 EA Adjust Water Valves, Gas Valves $150.001 $I,950.00 $75.00 $975.00 $200.00 $2,600.0(3 $500.00 $6,500.0(3 6. 3 EA CatchBasin W=28',includinglocaldepression $12,000.001 $36,000.00 $11,500.00 $34,500.00 $5,000.00 $15,000.00 $13,000.001 $39,000.0(3 7. 4 EA CatchBasin W=42',includinglocaldepression $15,000.001 $60,000.00 $19,500.00 $78,000.00 $10,000.00 $40,000.00 $23,000.00 $92,000.0(3 8. 7, EA Monolithic Catch Basin Connection $500.00J $3,500.00 $1,250.00 $8,750.00 $500.00 $3,500.00 $1,700.00 $11,900.00 9. 6 EA Junction Structure No. 2, B=36" $3,000.001 $18,000.00 $1,500.00 $9,000.00 $5,000.00 $30,000.00 $1,500.00 $9,000.00 10. 3 EA ManholeNo. 2 $6,500.00i $19,500.00 $7,500.00 $22,500.00 $6,000.00 $18,000.00 $10,500.00 $31,500.00 11. LS Sawcut existing riverwashed granite cobblestor $1,500.00! $1,500.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $1,500.001 $1,500.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 12. I LS Remove existing driveway approach and constr $500.00 $500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 13. I LS Bracing or Shoring $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $12,500.001 $12,500.00 $160,000.00 $160,000.00 $25,000.001 $25,000.00 14. 1464 LF 78"RCP (1800D) $425.001 $622,200.00 $412.00 $603,168.00 $400.001 $585,600.00 $415.00 $607,560.00 15. 185 LF 36" RCP(2000D) $200.001 $37,000.0C $225.00 $41,625.0C $300.00 $55,500.00 $200.00 $37,000.00 16. 36 LF 24" RCP (2000D) $150.001 $5,400.0(3 $120.0(3 $4,320.0(3 $250.00 $9,000.00 $175.00 $6,300.00 17. 2 EA Relocate existing 8" server Iine, perplan, comp] $15,000.00[ $30,000.00 $15,000.00 $30,000.0(3 $5,000.00 $10,000.00 $15,000.00 $30,000.00 18. 6 EA Construct support for conduits across trenches $300.001 $l,800.00 $1,500.00 $9,000.00 $1,000.0(3 $6,000.00 $500.00 $3,000.00 19. 2 EA Relocate and replace existing water meter and' $2,500.00[ $5,000.00 $1,150.00 $2,300.00 $2,000.001 $4,000.00 $300.00 $600.00 20. 1' EA Construct concrete blanket protection per City $1,000.00[ $1,000.00 $4,500.00[ $4,500.00 $1,000.001 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 21. LS Sawcut existing parkway drain and connect to ~ $1,000.001 $1,000.00 $3,000.001 $3,000.00 $1,000.00 [ $1,000.0(3 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 22. LS Pothole all existing utilities crossing proposed ~ $6,900.00[ $6,900.00 $6,500.00[ $6,500.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.0(3 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 23. 1 LS Remove andreplace existing damaged lawnar $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $9,5oo.ool $9,500.00 $x,ooo.oo $1,ooo.o(3 $5,ooo.oo, $5,ooo.oo 24. 40 EA Install inductive loop detectors, complete inpla $350.00 $14,000.00 $300.00[ $12,000.00 $350.00 $14,000.0(~ $300.0(3 $12,000.00 25. 1 LS Traffic Signing, Striping and Pavement Markin $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $13,5oo.ooI $13,500.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.0(3 $25,000.0(3 $25,000.00 26. I LS Traffic Control $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 ~,27. 1 LS SWPPP $5,000.001 $5,000.00 $6,500.00$6,500.00 $2,000.00$2,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.0¢ -~ Page 1 TOTAL [ $985,000.00 [ $1,063,948.00 I $1,o82,1oo.oo $1,150,510.0C BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING APRIL 5, 2005 Base Line Road Storm Drain Improvements and Pavement Ross A. Guy & Sons, Inc. SlID Engineering, Inc. Bnadiman-McCain, Inc. Beador Construction Rehabilitation from Ramona Avenue to Hermosa Avenue Company, Inc. NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST : AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST I AMOUNT 1. 1 LS Clearing and Grabbing, includes allremovals $1,000.00i $1,000.00 $23,000.001 $23,000.00 $8,500.001 $8,500.013 $50,3o5.ool $50,305.013 2: 1050 TONS Asphalt Rubber Hot Mix Overlay, including pa, $72.001 $75,600.00 $69.50] $72,975.00 $64.00 $67,200.00 $66.00[ $69,300.013 3. 280~ SY Variable Cold Plane from 0' to 0.12' Deep $2.ooI $5,600.00 $2.601 $7,280.00 $2.25 $6,300.00 $2.75] $7,700.013 4.~ 6 EA Adjust Manhole to Finished Grade $360.00! $2,160.00 $224.ooI $1,344.00 $550.001 $3,300.00 $275.00 $1,650.00 5. I3 EA Adjust Water Valves, Gas Valves $200.001 $2,600.00 $140.001 $1,820.00 $300.001 $3,900.00 $150.00 $1,950.00 6. 3 EA Catch Basin W=28',includinglocaldepression $15,9oo.ooI $47,700.00 $10,600.001 $31,800.00 $17,000.001 $51,000.00 $45,000.00 $135,000.00 7. 4 EA Catch Basin W=42', including local depression $24,600.001 $98,400.00 $14,800.001 $59,200.00 $20,000.00 $80,000.00 $55,000.00 $220,000.00 8. 7 EA Monolithic Catch Basin Connection $470.00 $3,290.00 $970.00 $6,790.00 $1,900.00 $13,300.00 $1,700.00 $11,900.00 9. 6 EA Junction Structure No. 2, B=36'' $1,440.00 $8,640.00 $2,450~00 $14,700.00 $1,400.00 $8,400.00 $2,900.00 $17,400.00 10. 3 EA Manhole No. 2 $5,700.00] $17,100.00 $7,300.001 $21,900.00 $5,000.00 $15,000.00 $8,500.00 $25,500.00 ll. 1 LS Sawcut existing riverwashedgranite cobblestor $500.001 $500.0C $4,640.00 $4,640.00 $5,800.00 $5,800.00 $4,500.001 $4,500.00 12. I LS Remove ex~sting driveway approach andconstx $1,400.001 $1,400.0C $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $5,500.001 $5,500.00 $4,500.00 $4,500.00 13. I LS Bracing or Shoring $10,000.00] $10,000.013 $22,600.00 $22,600.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 14. 1464 LF 78"RCP(1800D) $580.001 $849,120.00 $535.00 $783,240.00 $460.00 $673,440.00 $500.00 $732,000.00 15. 185 LF 36"RCP(2000D) $290.001 $53,650.0(I $360.001 $66,600.0C $255.00[ $47,175.00 $285.00 $52,725.00 16. 36 LF 24" RCP (2000D) $210.001 $7,560.00 $264.00 $9,504.0C $450.00 $16,200.00 $345.00 $12,420.00 17 2 EA R. elocateexisting 8" sewer line, perplan, compl $12,500.001 $25,000.00 $32,000.00 $64,000.012 $72,000.00 $144,000.00 $30,000.001 $60,000.00 18. 6 EX ~onstmct support for conduits across trenches $500.001 $3,000.00 $920.00 $5,520.013 $9,400.00 $56,400.00 $2,000.001 $12,000.00 19. 2 EA R. ehicate and replace existing water meter and $2,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,850.00 $9,700.00 $3,700.00 $7,400.00 $3,400.00[ $6,800.00 20. 1 EA Construct concrete blanket protectmn per City $430.013 $430.00 $804.00 $804.00 $7,200.001 $7,200.0C $1,250.00 $1,250.00 21. 1 LS Sawcut existing parkway drain and connect to ~ $580.00 $580.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $4,500.00 $4,500.0C $2,900.00 $2,900.00 22. I LS Pothole allexisting utilities crossing proposed : $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $7,800.00 $7,800.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.0C $30,000.00 $30,000.00 23. 1 LS Remove and replace existing damaged lawn an. $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $11,500.001 $11,500.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.0~3 $17,000.00 $17,000.00 24. 40 EA Install inductive loop detectors, complete in ph $220.00 $8,800.00 $213.001 $8,520.00 $225.00 $9,000.013 $425.00 $17,000.00 25. I LS Traffic Signing, Striping and Pavement Markin $13,500.001 $13,500.00 $11,500.001 $11,500.00 $11,000.00 $11,000.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 26. I LS Traffic Control $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $41,000.00 $41,000.00 $40,000.00 $40,000.00 $17,000.00 $17,000.00 27. 1 LS SWPPP $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $6,640.00 $6,640.00 $8,800.00 $8,800.00 $8,500.00 $8,500.00 BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING APRIL 5, 2005 Base Line Road Storm Drain Improvements and Pavement Steve Bubalo Construction Savala Construction Rehabilitation from Ramona Avenue to Hermosa Avenue Gentry Brothers, Inc. Co. Company Inc. UNITI ! UNITI UNIT NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT 1. I LS Clearing and Grubbing, includes allremovals $326,0oo.001 $326,000.001 $326,000.00 $28,000.001 $28,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 2. 1050 TONS Asphalt Rubber Hot Mix Overlay, including pa, $65.001 $68,250.00] $68,250.00 $93.00 $97,650.00 $106.701 $112,035.00 3. 2800 SY Variable Cold Plane from 0' to 0.12' Deep $2.o01$5,600.001 $5,600.00 $3.50 $9,800.00 $4.401 $12,320.00 4. 6 EA Adjust Manhole to Finished Grade $300.00 $1,800.00 $1,800.00 $400.00 $2,400.00 $550.001 $3,300.00 5. 13 EA Adjust Water Valves, Gas Valves $20.00 $260.00 $260.00 $300.00 $3,900.00 $330.00 $4,290.00 6. 3 EA Catch Basin W=28', including localdepression $18,000.00 $54,000.00 $54,000.00 $16,000.001 $48,000.00 $15,730.00 $47,190.00 7. 4 EA CatchBasin W=42', including localdepression $25,000.00 $I00,000.00 $100,000.00 $20,000.00 $80,000.00 $27,720.ooI $110,88o.oo 8 7 EA Monolithic Catch Basin Connection $2,500.001 $17,500.00 $17,500.00 $500.00 $3,500.00 $1,100.001 $7,700.00 9. 6 EA Junction Structure No. 2, B=36" $4,500.001 $27,000.00 $27,000.00 $1,500.00 $9,000.00 $2,090.00 $12,540.00 10. 3 EA ManholeNo. 2 $6,500.00[ $19,5oo.0oI $19,500.00 $8,000.00 $24,000.0C $7,150.00 $21,450.00 11. 1 LS Sawcut existing riverwashed granite cobblesto~ $2,000.001 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $1,000.001 $1,000.0C $3,500.001 $3,500.00 12. 1 LS Remove existing driveway approach and constr sa,500.001 SI,S00.00 sa,s00.00 $1,000.00 Sl,000.0C $3,500.00 $3,500.00 13. 1 LS Bracing or Shoring $30,000.001 $30,000.00 $30,000.00; $118,854.00 $118,854.013 $41,250.00 $41,250.00 14. 1464 LF 78" RCP (1800D) $575.ooI$845,800.00 $841,800.06 $754.00151,103,856.013 $752.413 $1,101,513.60 15. 185 LF 36" RCP (2000D) $150.o01$27,750.00 $27,750.013 $424.00 $78,440.00 $439.45 $81,298.25 16. 36 LF 24" RCP (2000D) $70.00] $2,520.013 $2,520.00 $400.013 $14,400.00 $411.40 $I4,810.413 17. 2 EA Relocate existing 8" sewer line, per plan, comp! $30,000.001 $60,000.00 $60,000.00 $13,000.00 $26,000.00 $31,377.501 $62,755.013 18. 6 EA Constmct support for conduits across trenches $1,50o.oo]$9,000.00 $9,000.00 $2,000.001. $12,000.00 $220.00 $1,320.013 19. 2 EA Relocate and replace existing water meter and' $3,500.00 $7,000.00 $7,000.00 $1,000.001 $2,000.00 $2,750.00 $5,500.013 20. EA Construct concrete blanket protectmn per City $5,000.00 $5,000.001 $5,000.00 $1,000.001 $1,000.00 $1,100.00 $1,100.00 21 LS Sawcut existing parkway drain and connect to ~ $1,500.00 $1,500.00[ $1,500.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 22. 1 LS Pothole all exishng utilities crossmg proposed ~ $12,000.00 $12,000.00 $12,000.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $27,500.00 $27,500.00 23. 1 LS Remove and replace existing damaged lawn'an, $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.001 $3,000.00 $3,300.00 '$3,300.00 24. 40 EA Install inductive loop detectors, complete in pl* $220.00 $8,800.00 $8,800.00 $180.00 $7,200.00 $400.00 $16,000.00 25. 1 LS Traffic Signing, Striping and Pavement Markin $7,500.00 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 $13,000.00 $13,000.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 26. 1 LS Traffic Control $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $33,000.00 $33,000.00 27. 1 LS SWPPP $3,000.001 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $5,500.00 $5,500.00 ' '~ Page 3 TOTAL [ $1,676,280.00 $1,672,280.00 [ $1,712,000.00 $1,761,852.25 BASE LINE ROAD STORM DRAIN AND PAVEMENT REHABILATION (FROM RAMONA AVENUE TO HERMOSA AVENUE) 24TH ST FC~OTHILL 6TH ST 4TH ST CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA VICINITY MAP /2? T H E C I T Y 0 F I~AN CHO CUCAHONCA DATE: TO: April 20, 2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst III APPROVAL OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH NO KILL SOLUTIONS FOR ANIMAL SHELTER CONSULTATION SERVICES IN THE AMOUNT OF $14,000 AND APPROPRIATE $14,000 TO ACCT. NO. 10011045300. Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council approve a professional services agreement with No Kill Solutions for Animal Shelter consultation services for an amount not to exceed $14,000 and appropriate $14,000 to Account No. 10011045300 for those services. Back,qround At the April 6, 2005 meeting of the City Council, the Council directed City staff to prepare a contract with consultant Nathan Winograd of No Kill Solutions for an assessment of the Rancho Cucamonga Animal Shelter and preparation of a "No Kill Blueprint" for the Rancho Cucamonga community. Mr. Winograd's assessment will include a review of written documents and materials such as Shelter policies and procedures, a 10-day onsite evaluation including inspection of the facility and meeting with stakeholders in the community, soliciting public comments, presentation of the report, and follow up as needed. The final product of this consultation will be a bound written report and presentation to the City regarding the Shelter assessment and Mr. Winograd's recommendations regarding the feasibility of the Animal Shelter achieving status as a No-Kill Shelter. The contract amount shall not exceed $14,000, which includes $12,000 for the assessment plus expenses capped at a maximum of $2,000. The contract indicates that the timeline for the assessment will be no more than six months from the date the contract is executed. Mr. Winograd has estimated that he would be available to commence the assessment process in June, which would indicate that a final report would be presented to the City in September. April 20, 2005 Staff Report: Approval of Professional Services Agreement with No Kill Solutions for Animal Shelter Consultation Services in the Amount of $14,000 and Appropriate $14,000 to Acct. No. 10011045300 Page 2 of 2 Staff prepared a Scope of Work detailing what we expected the assessment and report to include (attached). All of the items listed in the Scope of Work are included and addressed in the contract document. The contract is available for review in the office of the City Clerk. This is a sole source contract based upon the fact that staff was unable to identify another consultant offering these specific services. An approved Sole Source Justification form is attached. Attachments: City Scope of Work for No-Kill Animal Shelter Feasibility Consultation Sole Source Justification Form Respectfully Submitted, Michelle Dawson Management Analyst III CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SCOPE OF WORK FOR No-KILL ANIMAL SHELTER FEASIBILITY CONSULTATION The City of Rancho Cucamonga is seeking proposals from consultants to prepare a study discussing the feasibility of the Rancho Cucamonga Animal Shelter operating as a No-Kill Shelter. The following information provides an overview of the Rancho Cucamonga animal control and shelter programs as well as the scope of work desired in the proposed consultation. I. THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ANIMAL CONTROL AND ANIMAL SHELTER SERVICES Located in western San Bernardino County, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is a general law city of approximately 150,000 residents. The City is a balanced community of industrial, commercial and residential uses. The community is experiencing strong growth in all of these areas. The City has a Council-City Manager form of government, with a directly elected Mayor and four Councilmembers. The City has two separate contracts with the County of San Bernardino to provide animal care and control services in our community: ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES: The City has contracted with the County for animal control services since 1983. The contract amount of $62,700 has remained unchanged since that time. The County keeps all revenues generated through the animal control programs, including license fees, etc. Per the contract, the County is required to provide an average of 120 hours per week in personnel to perform animal control services. These services include enforcement of all ordinances related to animal control, impounding and quarantining animals, investigations, licensing, vaccination clinics, house-to-house canvassing for license enforcement, and limited, special emergency field services. Special field services provided to the City in recent years per the contract include coyote control and mountain lion surveillance services. Until the City constructed our own Animal Shelter, all animals were housed at the County Animal Shelter located in Devore, California. ANIMAL SHELTER OPERATIONS: The City completed construction of the Rancho Cucamonga Animal Shelter located at 11780 Arrow Route in 1993. Due to budgetary restraints, the City was not in a fiscal position to operate the Shelter, which at that time was estimated to cost $650,000 annually. In 1996 the City determined that the most effective means of operating the Shelter would be via contract with another agency and sought proposals for Shelter operations services. The City entered into a $108,000 contract with the County to operate the Shelter and the Rancho Cucamonga Animal Shelter commenced operations in September 1996. At that time, the Shelter was open to the public five days per week. In 2001 our contract for Shelter operations was increased to $305,600 per year to due to the expansion of operating hours to seven days per week, and State legislation increasing the minimum holding period for stray animals and mandating the spaying/neutering of all animals adopted out of shelters. -1- Per the contract between the City and the County for Shelter operations, the City is required to: · perform facility maintenance and routine janitorial services to non-animal areas · payfor utilities · provide furniture, office equipment (computers, copiers, etc.) and kennel equipment (cat cages, etc.) The County is required to: · operate the Shelter 7 days a week according to the agreed-upon schedule (11-6 Mon, Tues, Thurs & Fri; 11-7 Wed; and 11-5 Sat & Sun). · provide animal care 7 days per week · provide an average of 275 hours per week of personnel · provide all supplies associated with animal care and sanitation requirements (food, vaccinations, cleaning products, euthanasia solution), and dead animal disposal · collect fees which are retained by the County to offset costs of Shelter operations, veterinary fees, and any large and exotic animal housing at Devore Shelter · establish and supervise a Shelter volunteer program · communicate with City representative at least once a week to discuss Shelter operations · provide and maintain all vehicles used for Shelter services · assign and base an Animal Control Officer and vehicle at the Shelter · provide and operate an 800 megahertz radio base station · maintain a computerized licensing system on City-supplied computers BUDGET INFORMATION The City's Animal Control and Animal Shelter annual budget is currently $435,700, which includes the contracts with the County, facility maintenance, and utilities. As stated previously, the County keeps all revenues associated with the animal care and control services. For example, in Fiscal Year 2001/02 the County collected and retained $375,000 in licensing fees, adoption fees, etc. SHELTER STATISTICS The Animal Shelter statistics for 2004 are attached. During that period of time, 5,376 animals were taken in at the Rancho Cucamonga Animal Shelter. The adoption and return-to-owner rates for dogs was 79% and for cats was 44%. II. SCOPE OF SERVICES The City is seeking proposals to for the preparation of a study addressing the feasibility of the Rancho Cucamonga Animal Shelter operating as a No-Kill facility. In general and at a minimum, the City is seeking a consultant to provide the following: · Define the term "No-Kill" as it relates to the operation of a municipal, open-access Shelter and define all related terms such as "healthy and treatable," "feral," "adoptable," and "limited access." · Review current operations of the Rancho Cucamonga Animal Shelter, including existing policies, procedures, services, and programs. As the focus of this study is No- -2- Kill, the research shall be similarly focused on those services and programs currently utilized in seeking high adoption rates and Iow euthanasia rates at the Shelter. · Provide an assessment to the City regarding the effectiveness of the above. · Research local community contacts such as animal advocacy groups, veterinarians, and volunteers and provide the City with an assessment of the effectiveness of and potential for local support for a No-Kill Animal Shelter. · Provide an objective and thorough analysis of the feasibility of the Rancho Cucamonga Animal Shelter operating as a No-Kill Shelter. This analysis shall include, but not be limited to, the following: o Specific definition of No-Kill as it would relate to the City referring to the Rancho Cucamonga Animal Shelter as "No-Kill," including the expected outcomes and goals as well as the measurements used to gauge effectiveness and success. o Identification of all revisions and additions to existing policies, procedures, and programs that would be required in order to achieve a No-Kill Rancho Cucamonga Animal Shelter. This shall include an assessment of the level of community support from local veterinarians, rescue groups, volunteers, etc., necessary to achieve and sustain a No-kill program. o Levels of service vs. cost: Identification of the fiscal requirements necessary to achieve and sustain a No-Kill Animal Shelter in Rancho Cucamonga in accordance with the definition provided above. The analysis shall identify long- term financial requirements in addition to any "start-up" or immediate costs. If the recommendations include grant funding or any one-time financial opportunities, the analysis shall identify and address funding requirements for the future beyond grants. Also identify realistic opportunities for long-term grant or foundation funding. o Proposed timeline for implementation of a plan to achieve a No-Kill status at the Animal Shelter, if feasible. For example, would any implementation process be completed in phases or may steps be taken for immediate implementation? III. QUALIFICATIONS The City is seeking a consultant with proven, verifiable experience and history in this type of work. Minimum qualifications will include: · Broad experience in both animal control and animal shelter operations, particularly with municipal, open-access operations. · Knowledge of State of California animal laws and regulations. -3- · Knowledge of the history of the concept of No-Kill and all related issues and concerns. · Experience in implementing practices, policies, services, and programs at a municipal animal shelter(s) that have resulted in achieving a No-Kill standard at the shelter(s). Any documentation detailing specific, measurable results is desirable. IV, PROPOSALS Proposals shall include all costs that would be incurred by the City for consultation services to prepare a study discussing the feasibility of the Rancho Cucamonga Animal Shelter operating as a No-Kill Shelter, including the above scope of services and any reimbursable expenses to be paid by the City. Proposals shall include a detailed description of the product that would be presented to the City as well as anticipated start and completion dates for the study. We would anticipate that any feasibility study would be presented to the City Council by the consultant and the proposal shall include any costs associated with these and any other meetings that the consultant feels will be necessary. Please contact Michelle Dawson of the City Manager's Office at (909) 477-2700, ext. 2007 for any additional information. Please submit proposals to the following by 5:00 p.m. on March 24, 2005: Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst III City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 City staff will review the submitted proposals and make appropriate recommendations to the City Council. The City reserves the right to reject all proposals and shall not be liable for any expenses or costs incurred by consultants in preparing proposals. Attachment: 2004 Rancho Cucamonga Animal Shelter statistics cRa.c.o UCAMONGA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SINGLE/S OLE SOURCE JUSTIFICATION FOR PURCHASES $1,501 AND ABOVE The information below is provided in support of my Department requesting approval for a single/sole source. Outside of a duly declared emergency, the time to develop a statement of work or specifications is not in itself justification for single or sole source. VENDOR: [No Kill Solutions J DATE: I 4/ 3/2005 COMMODITY/SERVICE: r consultations services for Rancho Cucamonga Animal Shelter specifically addressing the feasibility of the Shelter becoming a "No Kill" Shelter ESTIMATED EXPENDITURE: I $14,000 ] YOUR NAME: I Michelle Dawson EXTENT OF MARKET Spoke with several consultants and experts in the Animal Shelter industry SEARCH CONDUCTED: looking for these specific services, contacts included the former Director of the San Francisco SPCA (a "No Kill Shelter"), the Executive Director of the Inland Valley Humane Society, and the Director of the Philadelphia Animal Care and Control Department. PRICE REASONABLENESS: The City is currently contracted with the Humane Society of the United States to provide Shelter consultation services (not spedfically related to "No-Kill") for $12,000, therefore we believe the proposed price for this contract is reasonable. Does moving forward on this product/service further obligate the City to future similar conlzract actual arrangements? .. DEFINITIONS: SINGLE SOURCE - a transaction with a business entity that is chosen, without competition, from among two or more business entities capable of supplying or providing the goods or services that meet the specified need. SOLE SOURCE - a transaction with the ONLY business entity capable of supplying or provicling the goods or services that meet the specified need. Initial all entries below that apply to the proposed purchase (more than one entry will apply to most single/sole source products/services requested). Attach a memorandum containing complete justification and support documentation as directed in initial entry. Check One: [] THIS IS A SINGLE SOURCE [] THIS IS A SOLE SOURCE 1. [] REQUEST IS FOR THE ORIGINAL MANUFACTURER, THERE ARE NO REGIONAL DISTRIBUTORS. (Item No. 3 must also be completed) 2. [] .THE PARTS/EQUIPMENT ARE NOT INTERCHANGEABLE WITH SIMILAR PARTS OF ANOTHER MANUFACTURER. (Explain in separate memorandum) 3. [] THIS IS THE ONLY KNOWN ITEM OR SERVICE THAT WILL MEET THE SPECIALIZED NEEDS OF THIS DEPARTMENT OR PERFORM THE INTENDED FUNCTION. (Attach memorandum with details of specialized function or application} 4. [] UNIQUE FEATURES OF THE SUPPLY/SERVICE BEING REQUESTED. THERE IS NO ALTERNATIYE SUPPLIER. (Attach memorandum with reasons why these unique features are and what benefit the City will accrue) 5. [] THE PARTS/EQUIPMENT ARE REQUIRED FROM THIS SOURCE TO PERMIT STANDARDIZATION. (Attach memorandum describing basis for standardization request) 6. [] NONE OF THE ABOVE APPLY. A DETAILED EXPLANATION AND JUSTIFICATION FOR THIS SINGLE/SOLE SOURCE REQUEST IS CONTAINED IN AI~-ACHED MEMORANDUM. The undersigned requests that competitive procurement be waived and that the vendor identified as the supplier of the service or material described in this single/sole source justification be authorized as a single/sole source of the service or material ~ ~ ~ ~ * PURCHASZNG DEPARTMENT ~ROVED [] APPROVED WITH CONDITION/S [] DISAPPROVED COMMENTS: I I $1~501 - $19,,999 $20t000 AND ABOVE See comments above by Purchasing Division Attach to Council Request RAN H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINE ERI~N G DE PARTi~ENT Staff Report DATE: TO: April 20, 2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: BY: SUBJECT: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Cindy Hackett, Associate Engineer ~ Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Technician ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED AND AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $138,188.00 TO THE APPARENT LOW BIDDER, SILVIA CONSTRUCTION, INC., AND AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF A 10% CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $13,818.80 FOR THE SAPPHIRE STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM 19TM STREET TO BANYAN STREET, TO BE FUNDED FROM MEASURE I FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO. 11763035650/1471176-0 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $138,188.00 to the apparent Iow bidder, Silvia Construction, Inc., and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $13,818.80, for the Sapphire Street Pavement Rehabilitation from 19th Street to Banyan Street, to be funded from Measure I funds, Account No. 11763035650/1471176-0. BACKGROUND/ANALYSI,~ Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on April 5, 2005, for the subject project. The Engineer's estimate was $166,175.00. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements with any irregularities to be inconsequential. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents. CiTY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Award Sapphire Street Pavement Rehabilitation Project April 20, 2005 Page 2 The construction of this project is to cold plane, remove and replace badly degraded pavement and install asphalt rubber overlay; adjust manholes, gas and water valves to new grade; and replace inductive traffic signal loops, re-striping and pavement markings. The contract documents call for twenty-five (25) working days to complete this construction. Respec~ully submitted, William~g. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:CH/RO:Is Attachment BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING APRIL 5, 2005 APPARENTLOWBIDDER ENGINEERS COST Sapphire Street Pavement Rehabilitation from 19th Street to Banyan Street ESTIMATE Silvia Construction, Inc. All American Asphalt UNIT I UNIT [ UNIT i ,NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST ! AMOUNT COST ] AMOUNT COST I AMOUNT 1., 1 ES Clear and grub, incl. all misc. removals, excav., gradin $12,000.001 $12,000.00 $5,631.00[ $5,631.00 $5,295.00] $5,295.00 2. 144( TONS ARHM, incI. crack sealing and pavement preparation $60.00i $86,400.00 $63.50! $91,440.00 $56.00/ $80,640.00 3. 125 TONS Asphalt Concrete $45.001 $5,625.00 $63.801 $7,975.00 $100.00 $12,500.00 4. 13500 SY Cold Planing $1.50i $20,250.00 $1.251 $16,875.00 $1.45 $19,575.00 5. 31 EA Adjust to Grade (Water Valves; Gas Valve) $200.00 $6,200.00 $25.001 $775.00 $90.00[ $2,790.00 6. 21 EA Adjust manholes to grade $400.00 $8,400.00 $208.001 $4,368.01] $200.00 $4,200.00 7. LS Striping, Pavement Markings $12,000.00 $12,000.00 $6,734.00 $6,734.00 $6,500.00 $6,500.00 8. 6 EA Re-install Inductive Loops $350.00 $2,100.00 $428.00 $2,568.00 $400.00 $2,400.00 9. 2 EA Measure I, Construction Notification Sign $600.001 $1,200.00 $106.00 $212.00 $1,120.00 $2,240.00 10. 1 LS Traffic Control $12,000.00[ $12,000.01] $1,610.001 $I,610.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 TOTAL [$166,175.00 I $138,188.00 I $140,140.00 BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING APRIL 5, 2005 Sully Miller Contracting Sapphire Street Pavement Rehabilitation from 19th Street to Banyan Street Hardy & Harper, Inc. Laird Construction Co., Inc. Corn ~any UNIT UNIT UNIT I~lO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT 1 I LS Clear and grub, incl. all misc. removals, excav., grading $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $12,155.00 $12,155.01] $10,150.00 $10,150.00 2. 1440 TONS ARHM, incl. crack sealing and pavement preparation $62.60 $90,144.00 $60.00 $86,400.00 $55.00 $79,200.00 3. 125 TONS Asphalt Concrete $62.00[ $7,750.00 $70.00 $8,750.00 $100.00 $12,500.00 4. 13500 SY Cold Planing $1.391 $18,765.00 $1.45 $19,575.00 $1.50 $20,250.00 5. 31 EA Adjust to Grade (Water Valves; Gas Valve) $75.00 $2,325.00~ $50.00 $1,550.00 $25.00 $775.00 6. 21 EA Adjust manholes to grade $210.00 $4,410.00 $215.00 $4,515.00 $325.00 $6,825.00 7. LS Striping, Pavement Markings $6,800.00[ $6,800.00 $6,500.00 $6,500.00 $8,000.00 $8,000.00 8. 6 EA Re-install Inductive Loops $350.00$2,100.00 $450.00$2,700.00 $550.00 $3,300.00 9. 2 EA Measure I, Construction Notification Sign $500.00$1,000.00 $250.00$500.00 $600.00 $1,200.00 I0. 1 LS Traffic Control $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $7,500.00 $7,500.0C TOTAL 15244,294.00 15145,145.00 I $149,700.00 ~ Page 1 BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING APRIL 5, 2005 Dye and Browning Sapphire Street Pavemeut Rehabilitation t'rmn 19th Street to Banyan Street Construction, Inc. R.J. Noble Company Gentry Brothers, Inc. NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT 1. 1 ES Clear and grub, incl. all misc. removals, excav., gradin $10,750.00[ $10,750.00. $5,500.00i $5,500.00 $30,000.001 $30,000.00 2. 1440 TONS ARHM, incl. crack sealing and pavement preparation $64.501 $92,880.00 $69.501 $100,080.00 $64.001 $92,160.00 3. 125 TONS Asphalt Concrete $65.251 $8,156.25 $70.401 $8,800.00 $50.00 $6,250.00 4. 13500 SY Cold Planing $l.551 $20,925.00 $1.481 $19,980.00 $1.25 $16,875.00 5. 31 EA Adjust to Grade (Water Valves; Gas Valve) $17.50 $542.50 $60.001 $1,860.00 $20.00 $620.00 6. 21 EA Adjust manholes to grade $225.00 $4,725.00 $220.00J $4,620.00 $300.00 $6,300.00 7. I LS Striping, Pavement Markings $6,100.001 $6,100.00 $6,000.00] $6,000.00 $7,000.00 $7,000.00 8. 6 EA Re-install Inductive Loops $470.00 $2,820.00 $440.00[ $2,640.00 $425.00 $2,550.00 9. 2 EA Measure I, Construction Notification Sign $750.00 $1,500.00 $550.00 $1,100.00 $500.00 $1,000.00 10. 1 LS Traffic Control $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $2,400.00 $2,400.00 $19,000.00 $19,000.00 TOTAL $150,898.75 I $152,980.00 $1817755.00 Page 2 VICINITY MAP SITE CHURCH 10 J'~EEWAY N.T.S. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SAPPHIRE STREET (~ s-rro r~.~ F~ A N C H O C U C A M O N G A E N G I N E E R I N O D E P A R T M E N T DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: April 20, 2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Tasha Hunter, Public Service Tech I ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE LETTER OF CREDIT, ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE LETTER OF CREDIT AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2002- 00601, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF VINEYARD AVENUE, APPROXIMATELY 600 FEET SOUTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, SUBMITTED BY SOMMERVILLE-CONZELMAN COMPANY RECOMMENDATION: The required improvements for DRC2002~00601 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Letter of Credit and accept a Maintenance Letter of Credit. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: As a condition of approval of completion of DRC2002-00601, located on the west side of Vineyard Avenue, approximately 600 feet south of Foothill Boulevard, the applicant was required to complete street improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City Council release the existing Faithful Performance Letter of Credit and accept the Maintenance Letter of Credit. Developer: Sommerville-Conzelman Company Release: Faithful Performance Letter of Credit #247955712 $67,600.00 (Letter of Credit No,) Accept: Maintenance Letter of Credit #030931157 $6,760.00 (Letter of Credit No.) Respectfully submitted, William' J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:TCH Attachment(s) RE. Dt-IILI. COUt~RY CL(IB N.T.S. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA VICINITY MAP DRc2002_00601 .... 8250 VINEYARD AVENUE RESOLUTION NO. 65°/w6 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2002-0060'! AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for DRC2002-00601 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bemardino County. RANCHO CUCAMONGA E N G I N E E R I N G D E P A R 1' M E N T Slaff Report DALE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: April 20, 2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Tasha Hunter, Public Servipe Tech I ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND, ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE CASH DEPOSIT AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2003-00319, LOCATED AT THE CUL-DE-SAC TERMINUS OF BIRDSONG PLACE, WEST OF HERMOSA AVENUE AND SOUTH OF ALMOND STREET, SUBMITTED BY HARDWOOD HOMES RECOMMENDATION: The required improvements for DRC2003-00319 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond and accept a Maintenance Guarantee Cash Deposit. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: As a condition of approval of completion of DRC2003-00319, located at the cul-de-sac terminus of Birdsong Place, west of Hermosa Avenue and south of Almond Street, the applicant was required to complete street improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City Council release the existing Faithful Performance Bond and accept the Maintenance Guarantee Cash Deposit. Developer: Hardwood Homes Release: Faithful Performance Bond #837565S $21,200.00 (Bond No.) Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Cash Deposit CR068764 $ 2,120.00 (Receipt No.) Respectfully submitted, Will~m J. O Nell City Engineer WJO:TCH Attachment(s) HILLSIDE WILSON AVE BANYAN ST HID_DEN ALMOND -',T. ~IRDSONG PL City of Rancho Cucamonga ENGINEERING DIVISION Item: Staff Report Title: Vicinity MaP EXHIBIT 1: DRC2003-00319 RESOLUTION NO. ¢ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2003-00319 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for DRC2003-00319 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. RAN C H O CUCAMONGA E N G I N E E R I N G D E P A R T M E N I- Staff Report DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: April 20, 2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Tasha Hunter, Public Service Tech I RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR TR 12659-4, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND 24TH STREET (WILSON AVENUE), SUBMITTED BY CENTEX HOMES RECOMMENDATION: The required improvements for TR 12659-4 were accepted on January 3, 2001, and it is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: As a condition of approval of completion of TR 12659-4, located onthe southwest corner of Etiwa'nda Avenue and 24th Street (Wilson Avenue), the applicant was required to complete street improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City Council release the existing Faithful Performance Bond. Developer: Centex Homes 2280 Wardlow Circle, Ste. #150 Corona, Ca.92880-2896 Release: Faithful Performance Bond Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer #5927987 (Bond No.) $1,953,000.00 WJO:TCH Attachment(s) WILSON AVENUE CI~ OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION I~ A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARYMENT Staff Report DATE: TO: BY: SUBJECT: April 20, 2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Michael TenEyck, Administrative Resources Manager ACCEPT THE ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM CONDUIT AND SUBSTRUCTURE PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. 03-103 AS COMPLETE, RETAIN THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND AS A GUARANTEE BOND, RELEASE LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $528,852.09 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council accept the Electrical Distribution System Conduit and Substructure Project, Contract No. 03-103 as complete, retain the faithful performance bond as a guarantee bond, release labor and material bond and authorize the city engineer to file a notice of completion and approve the final contract amount of $528,852.09 after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received. Authorize the release of the retention in the amount of $51,880.81,35 days after acceptance. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The Electrical Distribution System Conduit and Substructure Project consisted of installing 25,000 linear feet of 5" conduit and utility vaults within Foothill Blvd. East of Rochester Blvd. Pertinent information of the project is as follows: Budget Amount: $438,790.00 Account Number: 17053035650/1382705 Engineer's Estimate: $562,294.00 City Council's Approval to Advertise: Wednesday, August 6, 2003 Publish dates for local paper: August 12th & August 19th 2003 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Accept Electrical Distribution Conduit Project April 20, 2005 Page 2 Bid Opening: Contract Award Date: Low Bidder: Contract Amount: 10% Contingency: Final Contract Amount: Difference in Contract Amount: Tuesday, September 9, 2003 at 2:00 PM Wednesday, September 17, 2003 Pouk & Steinle Construction Co. $398,900.00 $39,890.00 $528,852.09 $90,062.09 (20.52%) Increase The net increase in the total cost is a result of three (3) change orders for various items that were necessary to complete construction of the fiber conduit and substructure improvements. Notable changes that were significant to the increase were the installation of fiber conduits and substructures within Foothill Blvd and Rochester Blvd. William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:MLT Attachments RESOLUTION NO. ~'" /¢~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM CONDUIT AND SUBSTRUCTURE PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. 03-103 AS COMPLETE, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the Electrical Distribution System Conduit and Substructure Project, Contract No. 03-103 has been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. R A N C H O CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT StaffR ort DATE: April 20, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: BY: SUBJECT: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Cindy Hackett, Associate Engineer,~ Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Tec'l'n~:iarr>~ RELEASE OF FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND AMOUNT OF $75,865.00, FOR THE HAVEN REHABILITATION FROM ALTA LOMA DRIVE CONTRACT NO. 03-131 NO. 08655345 IN THE AVENUE PAVEMENT TO LEMON AVENUE, RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release Faithful Performance Bond No. 08655345 in the amount of $75,865.00 for the Haven Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation from Alta Loma Drive to Lemon Avenue, Contract No. 03~131. BACKGROUND/ANALYSL~ The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. Contractor: Silvia Construction, Inc. 9007 Center Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730-5311 Respectful!y submitted, , William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:CH/RO:Is Attachments HAVEN AVENUE PAVeMeNT Rt~T-T~ILITATION (FROM ALTA LOMA DRIVE TO LEMON AVENUE) ~'O~]'HILL SLY[ ]~ANCHO CITY OF CUCAMONGA $ ffRepo DATE: April 20, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Thomas Grahn, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT CONSOLIDATED PLAN AND ANNUAL ACTION PLAN - A review of the federally required 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan and 2005-2006 Annual Action Plan, which includes the preliminary selection of CDBG projects, based on a new grant allocation of $1,134,608. RECOMMENDATION That the City Council conduct a public hearing and take public testimony regarding the application for funding, the draft 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan and the draft 2005-2006 Annual Action Plan, and direct staff to prepare the final reports, to be brought back for adoption at a subsequent City Council meeting. BACKGROUND Since the adoption of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act in 1990, the federal government has required jurisdictions to develop a more comprehensive long range-planning format to address the use of entitlement funds, such as Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds. The primary focus of these planning efforts is to benefit Iow- and moderate-income individuals and families, homelessness, Iow-income target areas, and other special needs populations. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) previously required the preparation of the Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS), but because of deficiencies in that document, HUD consolidated the efforts of several federal requirements into a single plan, resulting in the Consolidated Plan. The prior 2000-2004-Consolidated Plan was used as the basis of the 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan. Program years are based on the fiscal year, so the 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan will cover the period from July 1, 2005, to June 30, 2010. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT 2005-2009 CONSOLIDATED PLAN Apd120,2005 Page 2 ANALYSIS CDBG FUNDING CDBG funds are provided by HUD based on a formula that considers the City's population, extent of poverty, and age of the housing stock. Based upon this formula, the City will receive a grant allocation of $1,134,608, a decrease of $45,392 from the current program year funding. CDBG regulations provide that at least 70 percent of all funds must be directed to activities that benefit persons of Iow- and moderate-income. Of the activities proposed for fiscal year 2005-2006, 80 percent will benefit persons of Iow- and moderate-income. Additionally, to be eligible for CDBG funding, activities must meet one of the two primary goals of the CDBG program: · The development of viable, urban communities, including decent housing and a suitable living environment. · The expansion of economic opportunities, principally for persons of Iow- and moderate-income. THE CONSOLIDATED PLAN · The Consolidated Plan is a five-year planning document that addresses the use of federal entitlement funds with the goal of providing decent housing, a suitable living environment, and expanded economic opportunities for persons of Iow- and moderate-income. The Consolidated Plan is composed of three parts. The first section evaluates the Housing and Community Development needs of the City. This includes an assessment of housing needs for extremely Iow-, Iow-, and moderate-income families, including the needs of homeless individuals and families. The second section establishes a five-year strategic plan that includes priorities for assisting categories of residents by income level, objective statements, proposed programs, and accomplishments expected in the next five years. Finally, the third section provides an Annual Action Plan for the implementation of established Consolidated Plan programs. The first step in development of the Consolidated Plan was the determination of City and community needs. In this respect two workshops were held both to gather information on public and private needs through the five-year planning period of the Consolidated Plan, and the one-year needs of the Annual Action Plan. The first workshop was held on February 28, 2005, with members of the public and various public service providers. The second workshop was held on March 9, 2005, with various City departments. The next step includes public hearings for the purpose of taking public testimony regarding the City's application for federal funding and providing staff with direction in the preparation of the final document. At this public hearing the City Council may take testimony regarding the goals, objectives, and action strategies of the Consolidated Plan. The final step provides for an additional public hearing regarding the City's application for funding and adoption of the document. At this meeting, the City Council authorizes the Mayor to submit the plan to HUD for their consideration. This public meeting is scheduled for May 4, 2005. /,55 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT 2005-2009 CONSOLIDATED PLAN Apd120,2005 Page 3 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN Each year the City receives applications for various eligible activities that far exceed our funding abilities. Because funding of the CDBG program is limited by the allocation the City receives from HUD, and how we distribute those funds is codified in federal regulations, the City simply cannot fund all application requests. Those funds identified below in bold, refer to recommended amounts from 2005-2006 program year CDBG entitlements. Home Improvement: The City's Home Improvement Program has been in existence since 1990. The program currently offers deferred payment loans of up to $30,000 and grants of up to $7,500 for Iow- income, owner-occupied, single-family and mobile homes. Since the program's inception, we have received an overwhelming number of requests for assistance from both the single-family and mobile home community. Additionally, the Oldtimers Foundation Home Maintenance Program provides minor and emergency repair grants to seniors, Iow- and Iow-moderate income, and owner-occupied households. Staff recommends funding the City's Home Improvement Program $424,513 (including $300,000 in new funds, and $124,513 in revolving loan funds) and $10,000 to the Oldtimers Home Maintenance Program. Capital Improvement: The following activities are recommended for funding: · Sidewalk Gdnding - Involves the gdnding and repair and/or replacement of displaced sidewalks in qualified target neighborhoods. Staff recommends funding this activity $22,000. · Wheelchair Ramps - Retrofitting of existing intersection curbs to accommodate handicapped persons. Staff recommends funding this activity $22,000. Sidewalk Gdnding and Replacement in Identified Target Neighborhoods: Involves the grinding, repair, or replacement of sidewalks that are displaced and/or inaccessible. Staff recommends funding this activity $22,000. Hellman/Arrow Drainage Improvements: The repair of existing under capacity drainage improvements, to increase capacity and allow for removal of debris, thereby reducing the incidence of nuisance water in the street intersection. Staff recommends funding this activity $8,000. Northtown Area I Paving Rehabilitation: The design and construction of street oveday improvements for the Northtown Area 1 Paving Rehabilitation. Includes Feron Street (between Archibald Avenue and Hermosa Avenue), Jersey Boulevard (between London Avenue to Ramona Avenue), London Avenue (north of Feron Boulevard), Pasito Avenue (north of Jersey Boulevard), Ramona Avenue (north of Feron Boulevard), Belmont Avenue (south of 8th Street), Cottage Avenue (south of 8th Street), Main Street (between Archibald Avenue and Ramona Avenue), Reid Street (between Fercn Boulevard and Main Street), and Acacia Street (east of Archibald Avenue. Staff recommends funding this activity $278,100. Capital Facilities: The job center assists Iow-income individuals by provid!ng a safe and central place to seek employment opportunities and services such as English as a Second Language. The request includes leasing of the off`ice trailer, preparation of the project site, utilities, and bathroom rentals. Staff recommends funding this activity $25,000. (This includes $20,000 in new funds and $5,000 in reprogrammed funds.) CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT 2005-2009 CONSOLIDATED PLAN April 20, 2005 Page 4 Histodc Preservation: · The preservation of the historic Etiwanda Railway Station. This will be accomplished through renovation for adaptive rouse as a museum and trailhead for the Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail, a 21-mile long regional trail. Staff recommends funding this activity $48,088. The ongoing preservation efforts at the Chaffey-lsle House and the Norton-Fisher House. Staff recommends funding this activity $40,000. (This includes $30,000 in new funds and $10,000 in reprogrammed funds.) Public Service: Federal regulations allow communities to allocate up to 15 percent of their entitlement to fund public service providers. Fifteen percent of our entitlement is $170,191, the public service groups recommend funding a total if $169,500 (14.9 percent or our entitlement). Proposed funding will maintain current year Subrecipient funding. Three previously ongoing public service activities did not resubmit applications; these include HOPE, YMCA West End Kids Club, and YWCA Y-Teen. One new public service activity is recommended for funding, which is the Fire Departments request to provide automatic defibrillators in various locations. Public service activities include: Graffiti Removal, Fair Housing, Landlord Tenant Counseling, Homelessness and Food Assistance, Domestic Violence Shelter, Senior, Youth At-Risk, and Literacy programs. Staff recommends funding these activities $169,500. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION HUD emphasizes public participation in the development of the Consolidated Plan through citizen participation at significant points in the process. Cities are required to make every effort to involve the community in the Consolidated Plan's development process, particularly those individuals, that the Consolidated Plan strives to assist, including Iow- and moderate-income individuals and families, the homeless, and others with special needs. Our Consolidated Plan establishes a requirement for two public hearings. One, at the beginning stage of the Plan's development and the second after the draft of the Consolidated Plan has been prepared and published for a 30-day review period. The 30-day review period began on Apdl 5, 2005, and will end on May 4, 2005. The Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plan must be submitted to HUD by May 15, 2005, 45-days before the start of the new program year. PUBLIC NOTICE Notice of this public headng and proposed funding allocations was published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin on April 5, 2005 as a 1/Sth page display ad. Respectfully submitted, City Planner BB:TG Attachments: Exhibit "A" - 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan Exhibit "B" - 2005-2006 Annual Action Plan /5? CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM 2005-2009 CONSOLIDATED PLAN (JULY 1, 2005, TO JUNE 30, 2010) AND 2005-2006 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN (JULY 1, 2005, TO JUNE 30, 2006.) Draft Available - Apdl 5, 2005 Draft Review - April 20, 2005 Proposed for Adoption - May 4, 2005 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY OF THE CONSOLIDATED PLAN DEVELOPMENT PROCESS ................................................. 1 PURPOSE FOR A CONSOLIDATED PLAN ................................................................................ PROCESS TO DEVELOP PLAN ............................................................................................... 1 CITIZEN PARTICIPATION ....................................................................................................... 1 METHODS AND DATA SOURCES ............................................................................................ 2 CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN ......................................................................................................... 3 OUTREACH AND PARTICIPATION ........................................................................................... 3 PUBLIC NOTICE .................................................................................................................... 3 INFORMATION PROVIDED ...................................................................................................... 3 TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE ...................................................................................................... 4 PUBLIC HEARINGS ............................................................................................................... 4 LANGUAGE ACCESSIBILITY ................................................................................................... 4 CITIZEN COMMENTS ............................................................................................................. 4 AMENDMENTS ...................................................................................................................... 4 CRITERIA FOR AMENDMENT ................................................................................................. 4 PERFORMANCE REPORTS .................................................................................................... 5 .C. pMM. UNI~Y PROFILE .._. ................................................................................................................... 6 SUMMARY OF NEEDS ........................................................................................................... 6 ~EEDS ASSESSMENT. _ ..~. .......;_..~.: ....... :....._.:... ........................................................................ 8 EXTREMELY LOW- AND LOW-INCO~_E ................................................. 8 MODERATE-INCO_ ME~ ............; ......................................................... 11 MIDDLE iNCOME ..................................................................................................... 12 . INDIVIDUALS wITH [~i,~ABILI'~IEs AI~D FS~I~(~N~S w.i~'H~_~,~l~)~.~ ............................. 13 ~ATURE AND EXTENT OF HOM_EL_ ES_SNES_~ ....................... 13 HOMELESS N EEDS~ ................................................................................................. 15 SUBPOPULATIONS...._:._..:....._~.....:.:.._. ........................................................................ 16 RURAL HOMELESS/FA~MWORKERS ....................................................................... 16 PERSONS THREATENED WITH HOMEL__ES_~I~ -S~ ...................................................... 16 PO_PU_LATIONS WITH SPECIAL NEEDS ...................................................................... 16 Elderly an_d Frail_ E_!de_ rly .......................................................................... 18 D is able d....._...: .:.._. :..._.: ....... : ._.~. :...._._...~ ._ ............................................................. 18 Alcohol or Other Drug Addicfiops ................................................ 19 Female-Heade_d Households ............................................................ 19 Large Families .......................................................................................... 19 _ _Public Housin. g ......................................................................................... 20 [.~D BASED PAINT H-AZARpS ........................................................... 20 HOusING MARKETANALYSlS..:.~.~.............;...: .................................................................... 22 (~ENE._RAL MARKET AND INVENTORY; · ~. . ............................ 22 TENURE, _'~._P~E, _AND S!Z~_. DF LJNIT~S ....................................................................... 22 VACANCY.._.:.....::: ...... :. ............................................................................................ 22 HOUSING AVAILABILITY .......................................................................................... 23 NUMBER OF BEDROOMS ........................................................................................ 23 AGE OF HOUSING STOCK ....................................................................................... 23 S U BSTAN DARD U NITS S _U.I-T~L_E _F~__R_ R~__~_A~I ~. i?~0_ ~ .......................................... 24 COST OF HOUSING ............................................................................................... 25 AVAILABILITY OF HOUSING T _o*L_0_~-I~Q-~_H.~u~_~I~I.~D_S- .......... 26 HOUSING AFFORDABILITY ..._.._,~...._.:._.._,...__....~._..._.~._~.::.~..:._;;.._....~.._~._,_. ................................. 26 AVAILABILITY OF ~ ..OU~,~SI.N~ FO~ .TH_O.S_~ ~W~_T~-I_. _S~'~E~I_.AI.~_ ~EE_~D§ ........ 26 p! ab!e_d_ ................................................................................................... 26 CEy of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan ~ldedy/Fmil HI,Jetty.._. ...... :.:..~:._ ........ ._..._..:.._....: ............................................. 27 Persons with HIV/AIDS_ a_nd_ Th~J~ Fa_mil. jes~ ............................................. 27 Families with Children .............................................................................. 27 ~o.w-I~I-COME AN__D_RA.~I ~AL~/~ _ETHI~i~ ~1~ _T~RA~j~,I~ .................. 28 Income ...................................................................................................... 28 Low-Income T@~_e.t.Ar.e_a_s ....................................................... 28 Poverty S_tat_u~ .......................................................................................... 29 Ethnicity ..~_....._..: ......... :........~...~.~.~_......~...._....._~...__.: ....... :._._~.... ................................. 31 Low/Moderate-Income and Minodty Concen_tra_tiPn. ................................. 32 p~BL~CHou§~IG~..'i.~.~i."ii~i ..... ~. ~.' ;'~; ~. :.~' ~ ......................... 32 SECT ON ~_.....:: ..~........~. .......................................................................................... 33 APPLICANT QUALIFICATIoN~ ................................................................................. 33 MANAGEMENT AND OPERATION .............................................................................. 33 IMPROVING THE LIVING ENVIRONMENT'OF RI~sIDENTS ............................................ 34 i3TH~-~AsSI~TE~DUNTS~i. ~ ~ ..i.....[...i...i.~ i.....~...'~ ............................ 34 FACILITIES AND SERVICES FOR THE HOMELESS AND PERSONS THREATENED WITH HOMELESSNESS .................................................................................................... 37 DAY SHELTER .................................................................................................................... 38 SUPPORTIVE HOUSING FOR NON-HOMELESS PERSONS WITH SPECIAL NEEDS ................... 39 ELDERLY AND FRAIL ELDERLY ................................................................................ 39 ~J~I~.~D_. .............................................................................................................. 39 PERSONS WITH ALCOHOL OR OTHER DRUG ADDICTIONS ....................................... 40 PERSONS DIAGNOSED WITH AIDS OR RELATED DISEASES .................................... 40 BARRIERS AND OPPORTUNITIES TO HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ............................................. 40 NON-GOVERNMENT CONSTRAINTS ......................................................................... 40 GOVERNMENT CONSTRAINTS ................................................................................. 42 HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC PLAN ........................................................ 43 PRIORITY ANALYSIS AND STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT ........................................................... 43 ,~ous_-~G~ A~=~(~R~_D~_ L ~ 43 HOUSING AFFORDABILITY STRATEGIC PLAN ...................................................... ~ ................ 46 OBJECTIVE 1 - CONSERVATION OF EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY AND MULTIPLE FAMILY AFFORDABLE HOUSING STOCK .................................................................. 46 OBJECTIVE 2 - IMPROVE ACCESS TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOR ALL LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS, WITH EMPHASIS ON PRODUCTION OF LARGER (3+ BEDROOM) RENTAL UNITS ..................................................... 47 OBJECTIVE 3 - PROVIDE DIRECT RENTER ASSISTANCE TO LOW- AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSEHOLDS IN ORDER TO OBTAIN OR RETAIN PERMANENT HOUSING ................................................................................................... 48 OBJECTIVE 4 -- INCREASE HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES FOR LOW- AND MODERATE- INCOME HOME OWNERSHIP, PARTICULARLY THROUGH FIRST-TIME HOMEBUYER ASSISTANCE .......................................................................... 49 OBJECTIVE 5 - REHABILITATION OF THE EXISTING HOUSING STOCK WITH EMPHASIS ON OWNER OCCUPIED HOUSING ................................................................ 50 OBJECTIVE 6 - IMPROVE LIVING CONDITIONS FOR LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS ............................................................................................ 51 HOMELESS ........................................................................................................................ 51 HOMELESS STRATEGIC PLAN ............................................................................................. 52 OBJECTIVE 7 - ASSIST HOMELESS INDIVIDUALS, FAMILIES, PERSONS WITH SPECIAL NEEDS, AND THOSE AT-RISK OF HOMELESSNESS ...................................... 52 HOMELESS CONTINUUM OF CARE STRATEGY ..................................................................... 53 SPECIAL NEEDS ................................................................................................................. 54 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan SPECIAL NEEDS STRATEGIC PLAN ..................................................................................... 55 OBJECTIVE 8 - PROVIDE NECESSARY REHABILITATION SERVICES TO SPECIAL NEEDS POPULATIONS WITH EMPHASIS ON ASSISTING THE ELDERLY AND FRAIL ELDERLY ................................................................................................... 55 OBJECTIVE 9 - SUPPORT SERVICE PROVIDERS ASSISTING SPECIAL NEEDS POPULATIONS ............................................................................................ 55 NON-HOUSING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NEEDS ............................................................ 56 PUBLIC FAOILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS ................................................................. 59 PUBLIC SERVICES .................................................................................................. 59 ENSURE ACCESSIBILITY TO ALL PUBLIC FACILITIES AND STRUCTURES .................... 60 ADMINISTRATION AND PLANNING ................................................................... i ........ 61 H~GH PRIORITY .................................................................................................................. 61 Ec0~iJc-DE~[oF~E~ ..................................................................................... 61 OTHER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NEEDS ........................................................... 64 NON-HOUSING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NEEDS STRATEGIC PLAN ................................ 65 OBJECTIVE 10 - PROVIDE IMPROVEMENTS TO PUBLIC AREAS AND PUBLIC FACILITIES TO ENHANCE LIVING ENVIRONMENTS, IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF LIFE IN LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME NEIGHBORHOODS, AND FOR LOWER INCOME INDIVIDUALS, SENIORS, AND THE HANDICAPPED ......................................... 65 OBJECTIVE 11 - ASSIST LOCAL PUBLIC AND NON-PROFIT SERVICE AGENCIES THAT IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF LIFE FOR LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME PERSONS AND THOSE WITH SPECIAL NEEDS ............................................................. 66 OBJECTIVE 12 - ENSURE ACCESSIBILITY TO ALL PUBLIC FACILITIES AND STRUCTURES ............................................................................................. 67 OBJECTIVE 13 - THE RESTORATION AND PRESERVATION OF PROPERTIES OF SOCIAL VALUE FOR HISTORIC, ARCHITECTURAL, AND AESTHETIC REASONS ........... 07 OBJECTIVE 14 - PROVIDE THE NECESSARY PLANNING AND ADMINISTRATIVE CAPACITY TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY'S CDBG PROGRAM AND THE PROVISIONS OF THE CONSOLIDATED PLAN ..................................................................... 68 OBJECTIVE 15 - ALLEVIATE PHYSICAL AND RELATED ECONOMIC DISTRESS THROUGH THE STIMULATION OF PRIVATE INVESTMENT AND COMMUNITY REVITALIZATION IN IDENTIFIED TARGET NEIGHBORHOODS ................................................... 68 OBJECTIVE 16 - REVITALIZE AND UP GRADE HOUSING CONDITIONS, PREVENT AND ELIMINATE BLIGHT AND BLIGHTING INFLUENCES, AND ELIMINATE CONDITIONS DETRIMENTAL TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, AND WELFARE ................ 69 OBSTACLES TO MEETING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NON-HOUSING NEEDS .................... 69 STRATEGY TO REMOVE BARRIERS TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING ............................................ 70 LEAD BASED PAINT HAZARD REDUCTION STRATEGY .......................................................... 70 ANTI-POVERTY STRATEGY ................................................................................................. 70 INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURE AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL COOPERATION .............................. 70 PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS ............................................................................................. 71 NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS ................................................................................ 71 PRIVATE INDUSTRY ................................................................................................ 72 OVERCOMING GAPS ........................................................................................................... 72 STRATEGY TO OVERCOME GAPS ......................................................................... t..73 COORDINATION EFFORTS ................................................................................................... 73 PUBLIC HOUSING RESIDENT INITIATIVES ............................................................................ 73 APPENDIX A - GLOSSARY OF TERMS ................................................................................................ 1 APPENDIX B - CONSULTATION LIST .................................................................................................. 1 Page City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan APPENDIX b -PI~I~I~I~MM~'_-N~Ts~ ..................................................... 1 AP_P~ENDIX E - MAPS ........................................................................................................................ 1 MAP 1 - CEN~b~ ~-~U~IES ............................................................................................ 1 MAP 2 - POINTS OF INTEREST ~ ............................................................................................. 1 MAP 3 - Low/MOD INCOME AR~ ...................................................................................... 1 MAP 4 - LoW/MOD INCOME ................................................................................................. 1 MAP5- 1990 P RCENTMINORI~ HOUSEHOLDS ................................................................ 1 MAP 6 - ETHNICIW ._..: ......................................................................................................... MAP 7 - UNEMPLOYMENT .................................................................................................. 1 _ MAP8 - PRE-I~0 HOUSI~: .............................................................................................. 1 ApP~BD~X F - PRIORI~ NEEDS T~LES ........................................................................................... TABLE lA OME~SSAND SPECI~ NEEDS POPU~TIONS ................................................... 2 TABL~.I_~ SpFCJAL~EEDS OF TH~N~ON-HOMF~SS ................... 3 TABLE 1 C SUM~RY OF SPECIFIC HOMELESS/SPECIAL POPU~TION OBJECTIVES (TABLE I~B CONTINUATION SHE~) ................................................................................... 5 YA~EE ~- P~J6~E6s~UM~Y T~ ...................................................................... 6 TABLE 2B COMMUNIW DEVELOPMENT NEEDS ..................................................................... 7 TA L _ C SU RY OF SPECIFIC HOUS N ~A~LE ~B C~INUA~O~.SHE~) ........ 8 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan SUMMARY OF THE CONSOLIDATED PLAN DEVELOPMENT PROCESS PURPOSE FOR A CONSOLIDATED PLAN Title I of the National Affordable Housing Act establishes that state and local governments which apply for direct assistance under certain federal programs have a housing strategy that has been approved by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). In 1995, revised regulations consolidated the planning and application requirements of four federal formula grant programs into one single submission that include Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME), Emergency Shelter Grant (ESG), and Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA) programs. The 2005 - 2009 Consolidated Plan covers the program years from July 1,2005, to June 30, 2010. The Consolidated Plan is a five-year planning documents that identifies housing needs and problems, analyzes market conditions and resources, sets priorities and adopts strategies for addressing identified needs, allocates resources, and contains an annual plan. The annual plan identifies federal funds to be used, indicates the activities on which they will be spent, and sets goals for the number and type of households to be assisted by the applicable .federally funded programs. PROCESS TO DEVELOP PLAN The City of Rancho Cucamonga is the designated lead agency in the development of the Consolidated Plan. The process involved in developing the plan requires the involvement of vadous City departments as well as with state, county, and Social Service agencies, including the Housing Authority of San Bemardino County, as a means to acquire data and assess community needs. In addition, City staff conducted combined wdtten and phone surveys of local homeless and special needs providers. A list of those agencies contacted or interviewed regarding housing needs of children, eldedy, frail eldedy, disabled, persons With HIV/AIDS, and the homeless are provided in Appendix B. Census data used for preparation of the document was obtained either from the 2000 Census web site, from HUD directly, or from the Southem California Association of Governments (SCAG) Statistical Data Office. Information concerning incidence of lead-based paint was obtained from the County of San Bemardino Health Department Califomia Children's Services (CCS) program. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION A jurisdiction must take steps to ensure adequate public participation in the development of the Consolidated Plan. To achieve this two workshops were held both to gather information on public and pdvate needs through the five-year planning period of the Consolidated Plan, and the one-year needs of the Annual Action Plan. The first workshop was held on February 28, 2005, with members of the public and vadous public service providers. The second workshop was held on March 9, 2005, with vadous City departments. Notice conceming availability of the draft Consolidated Plan for a 30-day review pedod was published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin on Apdl 5, 2005 as a 1/8th page display ad. The public comment pedod opened Apdl 5, 2005, and closed May 4, 2005. The first public hearing was held on Apdl 20, 2005 to obtain input on the draft ~onsolidated Plan and the proposed allocation of funds; notice for this meeting was included in the Apdl 5, 2005 public notice. A second public headng was held on May 4, 2005, at which time the draft Consolidated Plan was considered and project applications for the 2005 program year were approved. City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan Notice concerning the second public hearing was published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin on April 20, 2005 as a display ad. The notice provided the locations where the document was available for review. Notices of the meeting were mailed to area public and private agencies, interested community organizations, and individuals. METHODS AND DATA SOURCES The methods used in developing the Consolidated Plan included: · Analysis of data from published soumes including the City's 2000-2005 Consolidated Plan, Community Profile, and Housing Element; · Contact with public officials and representatives of vadous social service agencies and organizations; and · Previous surveys, reports, and other available data. The published data, reports, and interviews represent the best available sources of information currently available. Data for the evaluation of special needs was often not available in published form and instead was often provided over the phone. The available published and written data sources used include: · 1990 Census; · 2000 Census; · City of Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency's Affordable Housing Strategy; · City of Rancho Cucamonga five-year Consolidated Plan for 2000-2005; · City of Rancho Cucamonga one-year Consolidated Plan Annual Action Plans for 2000- 2005; · Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report's (CAPER) for 2000-2003; and · City of Rancho Cucamonga 2000 Housing Element. City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Pragrarn 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN The preparation of a truly representative and useful plan is the result of an effective citizen participation process. The City of Rancho Cucamonga encourages and solicits the participation of its residents in the preparation of this document. OUTREACH AND PARTICIPATION The City encourages citizen participation, with a particular emphasis on participation by persons of Iow- and moderate-income, residents of target neighborhoods, and residents of neighborhoods experiencing physical deterioration. In order to reach as many residents as possible, letters are sent to community organizations and individuals concerning needs assessment and availability of funds. Display advertisements are published notifying the public regarding the availability of funds and soliciting project suggestions. Additionally, we solicit participation in the five-year needs assessment and the availability of the draft Consolidated Plan. Display ads are published in papers of local circulation; where possible this includes local minority publications. Notices are posted in community locations pdor to any public headng or other meeting. The City encourages participation of all its residents, including minorities, non-English speaking individuals, as well as persons with mobility, visual, or headng impairments. The City has access to related translation services including Spanish, Braille, and sign language, and equipment available to aid the hearing impaired. All advertisements for public hearings include a notice that individuals requiring special assistance to participate in the meeting provide the City with 48 hours notice to make arrangements. City Hall facilities are fully accessible to the handicapped. PUBLIC NOTICE The City provides adequate, timely notification of all local meetings and public hearings. Adequate notice, with sufficient information about the subject to permit informed comment, may be published in one or more papers of general local circulation at least two weeks prior to the headng; additional notice shall be provided as discussed elsewhere in the Citizen's Participation Plan. Notice of public hearings shall be mailed to all local community organizations, public housing agencies and residents, units of general local govemment, and interested parties. INFORMATION PROVIDED Prior to adoption of the Consolidated Plan, the City will make available to all residents, public agencies, and other interested parties adequate information concerning the precess and program availability. · Prior to adoption of the'Consolidated Plan, the City will make available information including the amount of assistance the City expects to receive, expected program income, the range of activities that may be undertaken, the amount that may benefit persons of Iow- and moderate-income, plans to minimize displacement of persons, and plans to assist any persons displaced. Citizens and community groups shall also be notified that they may have access to records for the preceding five years. · Copies of the proposed Consolidated Plan must be published for comment 30 days prior to adoption. This will be accomplished by publishing a summary of the proposed Consolidated Plan in one or more papers of general local circulation and by making City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan copies of the plan available at City Hall, Senior Center, Lion's Center, and City Library. The summary must describe the contents and purpose of the Consolidated Plan, and must include a list of the locations where copies of the entire plan may be examined. The summary will be published as a display ad one month prior to consideration of the Consolidated Plan. TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE The City will publish the names and telephone numbers of staff familiar with the Consolidated Plan who are available to answer questions and help residents and community groups. PUBLIC HEARINGS The City shall hold a minimum of two public hearings at two different stages of the program year. Public headngs must be conveniently timed and located for people who might or will benefit from program funds, be accessible to people with disabilities, and be adequately publicized. · A public headng shall be held prior to development of the Consolidated Plan to obtain the views of citizens on housing and community development needs, including pdodty non- housing needs. · The second public headng shall be held after publishing the availability of the draft Consolidated Plan. At this meeting, housing and community development needs are reviewed, past policies and program performance are evaluated, and proposed projects are discussed. LANGUAGE ACCESSIBILITY When necessary, the City will provide an interpreter to ensure that all residents can understand and participate in the Consolidated Planning process. CITIZEN COMMENTS The City shall consider the views of citizens, public agencies, and other interested parties, received in writing or orally at a public hearing, in preparing the final Consolidated Plan, amendment, or performance report and attach a summary of all comments to the final submission. The summary of written comments must include a written explanation of comments not accepted and the reasons why these comments were not accepted. The City will provide timely, written answers to written complaints and grievances, within 15 working days, where practical. AMENDMENTS Amendments to the Consolidated Plan shall be provided when an action meets one or more of the criteria for substantial change. Public notice of any amendment shall be provided at least 15 days prior to its consideration. The City must make amendments available for public review 30 days prior to final action and any comments received must be included with the submittal. CRITER~ FORAMENDMENT City of Rancho Cucarnonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan The City shall consider a "substantial change" to have occurred under the following circumstances. Any substantial change meeting these cdteda shall require amendment to the Consolidated Plan. · A significant shift is proposed in allocation priorities, for example shift from Iow to medium or medium to high, or a substantial change in the method of distributing funds; · An activity not included in the action plan is proposed for funding; · To use funds, including program income, not previously described in the action plan; · An activity included in the action plan is proposed for elimination or cessation; · The amount allocated to any activity is proposed to be increased or decreased from the amount described in the action plan by more than 25%; or · Change in the location of the activity, target area, beneficiaries, eligibility cdteda, or general scope from that described in the action plan. PERFORMANCE REPORTS Public notice regarding the City's Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) shall be provided at least 15 days pdor submission to HUD. Information conceming the availability of the document and the opportunity to comment shall be provided in the notice. The City shall consider any comments and a summary of those comments shall be attached to the submittal. City of Rancho Cucamonga Communify Development Block Grant Program 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan COMMUNI_T~_ P~R O~R_L~ !NCOM~I~ .................. · 21.3% of all households have incomes bel(~780~(~e a~-~,-~di~n~, ?_ 37.7% of all renter households have ~ncomes b_¢l.o~w 8_0__)~ _o_f t.h__e m__e. dj~a~, wh~r.e~s_, 1~5°_~ _of . _ owner households have incomes below 80%. · Large proportions of those belowpove_rty I_.e__vel_a_m_ fe__m_ale wi~ ~larg_es_t prop.orti.oq_n ~.~r wo_men _6~ yea__.~__o_r _o!~er. 1_1.1 ~/~_. · 78% o~-all elderly '~n~'~-r-ho-~se~olds-h~e'i~c"o-~ b~i~v~-80% -o_f_~l~r~-~ne~d!_a_n 56-~ have incomes below 50%, and 35% with incomes below 30%. · Elderly homeownem are similarlyin need with 53% have incomes b~i~.)~ ~8'0~ ~iq~ ~ ~ne~i~' 28% have incomes below 50%, and 10% have incomes below 30%. · 46% of large renter households have incomes below 80% of th_e._m_ed p_n, 2_9~Aa_~_e_ iq thee. moder_ate_-!ncqme_ 'cpt_eg~_ry, a~nd ! ~% wi~_i.nc.0.me~s bel_~w_ 50%_.! COST BURDEN[SEVER~ COST ~-I.I-RDEN · _ 43.3% of all renters experience hou~ing-c0s{ ~J~d-~:~'~o 3~-~a~oWn~-h~u~-e~; 18.7% of all ranter households and 10.3% of owners expenence severn cost burden. · Elderly ho useholds a re disproportionate!y m.p_resen_~t~d_ W!~ 7~._7% e~xpe+~e__n_c_ !3g cos_t bu_~_~q and 45.8% having severe cost burden. · A maj0rity of all renter households within each-f~ily Cate~lory-~h incomes belo~-~-f the median experience cost bur_dep,_ A_m..ajqri_ty _wi_th !pcp~es be o__w .5_0% .~f ~_e ~e~i_a experience severe cost burden, · A majority of all owner-occupied household"s-with-ipco~e~ ~b~lq~ -_50% q~ _th~e~a~ expedep_~c.~_ S.~ve_r~ cost bu~en OVERCROW~N(~ · 10,1% of all renter households and 3.0% of all'owner I~ousei3olds are ~-vercr~;~vcied! · Large renter occupied households are disproportionately represented with 7~,_1~ I.ow- ..6.0.Q_°~ !ow_-, and.35~6% modemte-incP_me hou~eh_ol..d__s qv~crqw~ed · 1,063 IoW- and mo~er:ateLi-ncome r~nt~er substandard with 882 units suitable for rehabilitation. · 987 10w- and moderate-income owner occupied units; 4~ _of th~ to_ta_! _a~-e~stj_~_~t-e~. ~ b~ su_bs~_nd__a.rd_wj~ .819 .upi~ S~Ui~._b_le' for H~UslNG ' Pmb,!e~- City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan Large pr0p~ o~ ~f~B*~,~6'l ~5~4% Of air i~ih~b~e h~Useh~ids~ ~of renter~aPi~i~ i.come ~11 iow_i~e ~nt~ hOUSeh01dS~ ...... r%te Seh&ia eXPe en~ng problems ~mpared to 49% for~e Ci~aS a ~o~ and 48~9% 0f miho[ity owne[ househo!ds are compared tO 39% for the Ci~ as a ~ole~ ~ ~remeiy;ibW i~C0~;Biack rente~ and °wne~ h6UsehOlds, in Pa~uiar~ have a signifl~ problem With 100% qf al! hOusehOlds having some probl~, while 100% of e~!Y~;!q~ .Surveys have identified between 25 and 156 homeless in the City at any.oB~fi.m._e~. !B~e_v~ . -c~.s._e, t_he_m~jO~d_tyg.f._~_os~e iPdiv_iid_ q_al~ w~e_reid._er~_tifie_d_~as~ Hi_spp. pi__c ..m_al_es_... · The bit~ identifie~cJ-tl~ ?o~oTv~in-g'~{e~ri-e~-~r~p-e&~f ~e~ p(~p*~tJ~n~.:- elderly, disabled;persons with drug and alcohol addictions, persons with AIDS or ~!~e_a__sps~, f~pl_e-.he_ad_ed_ b_ous__ebql, d_S-, ~rg_e_ fa_mi!Les,, p_n.d, p_u_bl!_c~h.o_u_s_ing residents: LEAD PAINT AZAR~, ~ '--:., t ,746 iow- ar{d-r~(~(j~-m~*e~n~o~e hoUse~-~r~ ~s~r~a~ {0 h*~e-i~den~ ~ Jea~2~ paint~ The Child Health and Disabilities prevention Program of San Bemardino Coun~ m~ed 10 ~ses of lead poisoning o~ ~ ~Bg~ ~p_Ra~_g ~u~o_~g~ 9 o~ t~ose ~s~ CE]/of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan · NEEDSAS~E~E~ EXTREMELY~I~ ~v~:~D Low-INcoME individuals or hOuSeholds falling Within the e~rem~ly iow:'~n~-iow,income ~{~g0des am' Often unable to find affordable housing and services. This need is particularly acute for those in womt case s tuat ons with inc0~es b. elpw those in the e~re_.me yl0w-~n~_rp~ category ea..m.!ng 30% of ~e .ama mff~iaq i~qo_ m_e.z A large proportion 18.7% of all ranter occupied households are Iow-income, 9 ~am extremely Iow-i and 9.7% am Iow-income_: .In o. wner house.ho!~s, 7% are Iow?!P~c0me pnd _3% fa_!l, wi~h.!n t_~.e ,extmn!e!y !0~w- c~ego~ Table ii - bistribu{ion of Incor:ne · Number;~ . ~ of Total ~ :Numb.e.¢~; :~: Y, ofTota ; Extremely Low (Q-30%) ~57 9.0 ~.3:1. 3.0 L0~ (3j:5°%) 9~ ~,7 ~75 4.0 Subto~i 1777 i 8.7 1706 ~'.0 Uod-eratP (~1~0%) ~,796 19:~ ~ 928 Middle (8 i :~%) 91 ~ 9.6 ~1,277 5.3 Source: CH,aS Databook Table 5, PaPs 5 and 8. Note: The total number of occupied households provid~d in these tables does no~'agme wi~ info~afio'h*pmvided in ~ 1~990 Census. CHAS Databook tables show 9,479 renter-occupied households aqd 24,090 owner-occup!ed households while the ~e0sus ~hows 9,997 renter-occupied hous~ehold~ pnd 2~ 3,63~8 owne_r-occupLed households. Slighti~, I~rg~r ~proport~ons of minority households am iow- and m°d~ate-in~)me"c~pamd to {~e proportion of Iow- and moderate-incomehouseholds as a whole. Based upon 1990 Census data, 15% of all Hispanic and Asian and Pacific Islander househ_o!d_ers, and 13~% qf Bla_ck~ a_pd Native Amed~3 _hou_s_ehoIds, am Iow- a_nd moderate-income. FAM!LY ~_'~/T_E NA~NCY Large prop-°~tions ot elded'y renter and Owner households ha~;e ir~c0mes ~elow -~b%~0~ {h~-are~ e o median income (see Table 2). Within eldedy renter households, 56 ~ are Iow;income and 35 ~ are extremely Iow-income, Within elderly owner households, 28% are Iow-in~com~ ~and~ 10% am extmme!Y !o_w.-inc_._ome. City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan %bie 2: P~rcen-t Of HOU~-h"old~ W~{hin ~-ac-h -F-a~ii~ ........ HOUSEHOLD ~PE~ ~ 0.30 -3t.50 51-so~ .... ~ ~m~ ;~i~edy 10 lS 25 ~ 3S g To~l ~ ~ ~ ~ ~0 24,0$~ Ir{ t~o u~t~olds~vi~th income~-b~J0~'~;l~]o by ethnici~/ar{d f~amil~/type, sm~ll 'Bl~'(~-re n~e'r t~mil-i&~ and large Hispanic,renter families are disproportionately represented. Of the total Iow-income Black, renter families, 61.8% are small, compared to 45.4% for al other sma I renter households; 26.7% of all Iow,income Hispanic-renter households are large, compared to 9,8%'of all other large.rente~ households, Large, H span c, owner-occup ed househo ds are also disproportionately represe__n~t~d. wit_h_ 2_9~% .W!~h in_~co_mes~ ~bel0w 5! % as comp~r_e~ t~ 12_% o~ tptal !a_rge_~w_pe.r hqu~_seh, o_!ds._~' ~, Elderl~;~J !HOUs ~- ~Totalv ,~ ,~:~ Small~.~ REN ~ ~ ~ ~: 1,777~ BlaC~ ~ 12~Z ~_~ Hi'spaniq 4~0 ~-~ 5P[.~ 2~.~~ ~. 1 706 ~ ~29~; ; ~;~ ~120 OWN ~ ' ~inor[~ 600 BlaCk 86 H~sPeD~q 339 ~6.3 Sp~rce; CHAS. Da~ book Tp.b. lp 7~ Large pro~ortio'~s* o~-r~n{~Fh~-~S~ii°idS-~X'p~h~ ~S{"bu-r~J~r~: - i~;it~ i~0~s-e~d,s' expeden~ ~st bu~en and 18.7% experiencing severe ~st bu~en (see Table 4). Eldedy rentem experience the most severn cost bu~en as 74.7% pay mom than 30% and 45.8% pay more ~an 50% of their in.me on rent. The majod~ of all e~remely Iow- and Iow4ncome renter and owner households are ~st burdened: 83% of all e~mely Iow- and 91% of all Iow-in.me mntem and 72% of all e~mmely Iow- and 74% of all Iow-income ownem burdened (see Table 5)~ A majgd~ 9~ e~dedy hops~hg~s, 45~, ~xp~d~ ~PY~m_~ ~rdpD. (s~ T~ ~)~ City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan Table 4: Cost Burden Household Income Source: CHAS Databook Table 5 percentage of total, qu. mbe? of extremely Iow-income large*renter families. The majority of all large renter families in the extremely Iow- and Iow-income Categories are ovemrowded. FOr the purposes of completing the Priod~ Table, estimates on the number of overcr, owde~, h_o. us~hg!d_s f_gr r_e_n.~e~: _ho_u_.s.e_~gl_d~_by.~a~¥ ~Pe~ a. pd in..cpm_~ h__a_y_e_b~eep provided; yabJe-~ .... P6~cen~ In~J~6~e o-f ......... SoUrce: it is estimated {hb~ the~:e ar~ ~39 extremely 16w: and Iow-income owner un!~ !n substandard c0nd!_t[0..q~(.see Table !7)~ of ~es_~e units 83% are su!.ta...b~!e.~for rphsb_l ~fl_~n_~ In order to provide analYSis of many of the factom considered previously, HUD cross-tabulated three variables to determine the proportion of households expenencmg housing problems" (see~ Table 6). The three areas include the number of households that: 1) occupy units with physica! defects (lacking complete kitchen or Plumbing); 2) live in ove__r.c~rg.w.ded__con_~_dition_s; _a_nd ~)h · housing cost burden or have a severe housing cost burden. Extremely Iow-income renter-occupied Hispanic households are disproportionately represented with~ 100% experiencing some type of housing problem. By comparison, 100% of all Black 0woer~ pccup!e~ .e_~e__.rn_e_!y !ow.: a~n~ Io__w_-ipco_m_e_h_ous. ehp!~s_ e_xp_edep,_ce__s Ao_m._~ _typ_e_o_f h_o_ys_.iqg problem. CEy of Rancho Cucamonga Comrouni~y Developroent Block Grant Proograro 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan RENTE ~' :OWNE ~ i~ ~0-30~ ~3'1~0~ ~51-S0~! ~?/~Total~ ~':~ ~ Yot~ 86.0 93.3 ~.8 ~9=~ ~i :7 7~.~ 59~ ~,q Mino 89. 72.4 Biac~ B1.2 100.~ 86 2 58.6 100~ ~lOO.q 8~.t 50.3 Mihority ho~s~h01~ ~-r~ 8Jspr(~P6~0nateiyrep~e~ted'i'n'asse~sing ~e ~eds wi{hir~ ~ J~wJ~nd moderate-in.me ~tegoHes. In small-ranter families, Blacks have a larger mpmsen~fion, 61.8%, ·an of the to~t mntem, 45.4% (see Table 3). For large-ranter families, Hispanics am signifi~n~y over-represented with 26.7% of the total mnte~, 9.8%, in this income group. The dis~bu~on fo~ owner~ccupied families shows Hispani~ exceed by mom than ha!f, 29.8%, the propo~on of la~e families, 12.0%. The number of households with any housing problem is represented by 100% o( Hispanic e~mmely Iow-income ranter h0qs~ho!ds, ~nd ~0~%_o~th~ ~r~m~!y. Jp? ~n~ ~ ~a~ h~m~n~_ (s~ Tabl~ .!0)~ MODERATE"INCOME in 1990, i i ~ at the ~i~'-~-t~J I~ouseholds had incomes beJo~/~0%'~f~e ~a ~c~a~': -A Jarg~ proportion of those households had significant housing problems aqd many of~hese hou~seholds were un_ab~ _t~o ~n_d affordable housing t.9 _.meet their ne~ed__s; Nineteen pe~'~.en~[ 6¥-ren~er households and 8~'of~ 0w~er-~c.~Up~d-~6us(~h'~id-fa~i-~i{~in'{h~ moderate-income category (see Table 1). Large family renters have a disproportionate number of moderate-income households within this category, with 29% of large households compared to 19% of renter households. The proportion of moderate- ncome e derly hom_eo_w~ners 25)/? ~e~c_e__e _ds_t~ pe_men_t of !oW-incgm~ homeowpers fq{ t_h.e City as a who!e, .8%, COS~ BURD__EN S ~tylnin~ per~n~ of ~ll boS~mte:incor~e ~u~eh0id~ 'are C(~S{ b~ra~hed, ~?;"~t income renters, and 56% of all moderate-income owners are cost burdened (see Appendix F, Table, 2A). Moderate-income renter households have a greater incidence cost burden, 15.6%, compared, to do owner households, 4.4% (see Table 4). Twenty-five percent of all moderate-income households are severely cost burdened with 19% of moderate-income rent~rs ~a..n~. moderate-income o_w_ qe.rs s~everely co~t_burdeped (~s~e~ App~ndj~ .F, Ta.b!e 2~).~ OV.EA~R. OW DLN(~ ~as~ed-'~)6n -{amil-~; ~/-~ i~-rge ~-e~{e~-~c~ul~Jed {a-~l~s'~-d~i3~p0rti~m'aieTy-~e'l~m~-r~t~d Wi~ 35.6% in over_crowd_e~ _sit_uat. i_o~s _compa~ ~0 1_4.5% .qf modera~_e-.inco~e repter-occupied hgHs__ehpJd_s: City of Rancho Cucarnonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan ii is es i atea tha¥i % ai s b dard h'ousi O piea (see Table 17). Eigh~-~ree percent of ~ese uni~ are sui~ble for rehabili~fiom Additional anal~is of households expeHencing a housing problem in 1990 is provided (see Tab!es 8 & 10), Seven~-thme per~nt of all moderate-income owner and mnter~ccupied households e~eHen~ some fo~ of housing pmbtem. The incidence of housing problems by ethnici~ show a signifi~nfly greater inciden~ of housing problems, 85~/~, when ~q~pamd t~ ~-~o~ househol~ a~ a.whole, ~3~ .(see Ta~e Eigh~-fiV~ Pe~ ~ ~n&~ homeo~nem ha~e ~9m~ ~f ~rP~ ~m~m~ ~9~ of modemte;income hq~ow~e~ (se~ Ta~!e 6)~ Approxim~{ely ~'~4 0f~ail he~sehold~ Were ~la~pi~e_d_ ~s Re ~middlpj~m~ iq ~b~ ~n~ip~ngg~6~&.~ all rent~m and 5~pf P~O~ There do~ n6~a-ppear t~ bYa ~ignificant over E& r&s h B h'o a Y Jn ~h~ ~b~i~ of family ~pe by income and tenure (see Table 2), and there does not appear to be a signifl~nt over representation by any family group. EldeHy ranter households show a decreased pmpo~op_ ~q~ the ~mt t me ~s_?8~ o~ ~11 e~d~rly renter hou~holdS h~ ingg~e~ ~l.~w 8q% o.f the ~edi~p~ A slight maj~Hty o~ ~Jl middJe-Jn~:ome household~ experienced ~ h-o~u si~(~ ~ostburden {s~ ?~b]~;{ & 5). Based on tenancy, 51% of all rentem and 66% of all ownem experienced housing cost burden. The proportion of households experiencing severe cost burden is significantly less with the exception of "other" households, as 47% of renter and 28% of owner households experiencing severe cost burden. Based on family type, the proport.q~n, q~ el_de~y re.n__ters !s~.s]gn_ificant co~pa__re~ tp the to~ housebo_ds !p thi_s. ~ca~tegory (see Ta~b.l_e 4). bYE RcR_o~/-D~G It was ~o{ ~'~o~si~Je'J~) ass--ess ogercmwding i~ midciJe ;i~com~ ~-a-mil~es[-a s {hJ~ data-v~(~t P?0vid~e~ in the census or CHAS tables. Based.on see Appendix F, Table 2A, and the CHAS Databook Table 8 52% of the overcrowded rental households were in the extremely iow-, Iow-, or moderate- ,ncome categories; that leaves 48% in the middle or other income categories. This is true for owner households with 33% of the overcrowded households in the extremely Iow-, Iow-, and moderate, income categories and 67% in the middle income or above categories. One explanation for this fact may be the increa_sed number qf ext_en~e.d. ~fa~ilies liyi~g toge~pr when_ ~ey a_m_ U~D~bl~_e t.o. ~ ~ff0rd ~ cost of housing~ SUB~ANI~A~_D ~OND~!~N City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan it Was a~sum~(J {~hat all ~ubs'{anda{'duni{s were occul~i~d b~ ~emely'low-,- lOw-, 'and'moderate- income households. It was estimated that there am no middle income substandard units. The proportion of middle incomehouseholds experiencing housing problems includes 61% ranters and~ 69% owners (see Table 5). Large, ranter-occupied familieshad, the gre_~a_t-e_st preport-i~on pmb_le~s, wh~!!_e e_!d_e~y, rep~ter hpus_e.~h_oLd~ had t_h-e f. ewe__st. la{iv , er cfifis'fia v he'l ' g st -~e~:ce~{~g~ of h 'u-seho ds !n-t~ ~n0~l~e-r~te-in~m~ (1~1%) with His. pa_n!c hOqseho[d_~s h~vi~g ~he_next !a_rges'~ p_r ~op _o~iop (8°/?) as cp_mpa..red,tp a whole (7%)... A6t~) ~tati~ti~] ~t~aa~l-infc~r:rfiati6n on thin(~ s~t~s inc, o-r~; c°~{ 13u~de'r~, ~nd concerning those with disabilities and HIV/AIDS is not available. Assumptions wera made that large proportions in these categories fall in the extramely Iow-, Iow-, and modemt_e-_i.n.._cg__m.e~ _c~.~eg~..es aqd~ _a.m likely _to .halve pro_ble~_s, wit~ ..cost b~!~p e~ ~qb-s.-.ta~nd-ard- -hp-u-sing~ aabp o ct6 ' 9 J5-;i J )gC°-nsolid ite( fi; 6tai of vera r -cl the purpose of determining the number of homeless individuals in the West End araa (see Table 7).. Two surveys wera praparad by the San Bemardino County Homeless Coalition (February and November 1992) while a third was conducted by the Center for Community Affairs of California State Polytechnic University, Pomona (May 1993). The methodology and rasulting data vary between surveys; however, they do serve to provide a pictura of the homeless population at vadous pedg_d_§ qf time and tog_ether pm¥!~e a go. od i_ndi ~c~3. tiqn qf t.h.~ c_ha.ract~erg~' t_he ~o~eles~s p_op~lation: Th~San~B~n~din0 (~ou~b] ~lomeie~s i3~aliti0n is~0rga~ni~ed ivTt~ sev-eh'[o~a~co(~rdir~a~r~ g {lmups. The West End Coordinating group encompasses the immediate regional area and includes Chino; Chino Hills, Montclair, Ontario, Rancho Cucamonga, and Upland. Their first survey was conducted in February 1992. In the week befora the survey was taken, the araa experienced extensive rainfall and it was felt that the number of homeless was undercounted. The number of homeless identified may have been Iow for the County as a whole, 2,801 persons, the hum_ b~e.!' Pf Rapqho Cu.~ _moqga w_a~s a _s_igq!fi~nt 156 i_ndj¥!d_U~[S_. As a 'ra~uit ~{'t-heir'conc~e-ms al;out-an Urid~r(~0~nt,-the'Coaliti0n'co~]ucte~ -a s~con~ survey in November 1992, This survey occurred over a thrae-day period. Again, the Coalition experienced a problem during the survey in this araa in that they did not have enough volunteers available to obtain an accurate count. While the number of homeless identified in the County was graater than in the pray!0!4.s suwey, 3~,08!, the count_ for Raqcho Cucampng~ ?a.s sig_ni_fic~p_t!y !ewer ~ith 39 persq~_s; ¥~e '~i-~d surVey con~lu~:ted~/~r several weeks {~r~igh' Cai P~i~;,-15°mo-na, a~d ~vas ~,omplete~ ~n May 1993. In order to attempt to avoid double counting, the interviewers would ask those interviewed if they had answered a similar survey in the last two weeks. The araa covered differad from the first two surveys in that Pomona was included and Chino Hills wa~s_ pers~on~ we.re i.nterv!ewed of which ~25 were ~rO~ Ra~c~hp_.Cqc-~ mo~ng~; It i~'imr~dia{e[~ app~J-en~ ~ha{ fh~ n-un, her of m~les'~ar~u[~i~hs-the number 0~-¥&?h~ie%-who are ider!tifi_ed as homeles~ I_t is inte.re_sfing t_hat ti3__e Ca_l P_o!y ~.uw-ey i_d.-e.n.t!fie~s _a.n..e¥-e~ ~a_~rg-er i~_ro_p_qo.rtio~ City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan of m~ieS t~o ~ai~s.~ The pmpor[ion of males is consistently h~gl~r'in ~anch~ (~uc~(~g~'th~n'~r~ the West End region. This is reflective of the fact that the western sec~on of A~w Route has histod~lly affracted day laborem who ~ngmgate daily in specific Io~ons along ~is street. This would also explain the fact that ~e su~ey resul~ show a larger pmpo~ion of Hispanic individuals in Rancho Cucamonga as ~mpamd to the West End, Since this su~eywas ~ken, ~e Ci~ pa~ an ~ti-loited~g.~w t~ ~igni~y reduced th~ .gu~er of i~diy~d~l~ ~n g~ t~ ~: A pdma~on~m'is the n~b~r0t ~ildren ~d~n~fied'aS~e~ homeie~'as ~5~ 0~ ~uwey~ in ~e West End were under the age of 18. This da~ appeam to be generally ~nsistent for the ~o Homeless Coalition su~e~. The May 1993 su~ey found a lower inciden~ in the numbem of children be~een the ages of 10 and 20. An even greater contra is ~e pmpo~on of these children who am not in school. Of the respondents answering this question up to 26% of the childm~ be~een ~e ages of 5 and 18 were not in school, with ~e per~pt~ge as h~gh as ~3% i0 ~he Noye~ber-su~Y~ A summa~ of ~he number'&f~in'~ivi~uais'assisted {hmug~ ~e area~s ho~ei~-~h~tem an~f~c~li~ is provided (see Table 8). Comparing this da~ with info~ation on available sh~l~ ~ ~ ~he number of pemgns in need.far 0u~eighs th~ av~lable s~r ~p~ City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan Table ~:' HomelesS ....... '~ ' ~: RANCHO CUCAMONG~:,~:~ ~ Fe~,,,92~ ~: Nov 92 Ne. HOMELESS ~85 4~ ~9 ~*~6 Male 59% 53% ~0% 65% ~7% 96% Fema!~ 41% ~7% ~0 ~ ~8~ ~3°~ 4% CHILDREN ~/~ 4q% ETHNICl ~ ~ ,~ Black 1~% 12% 26% 3% ~% J6% Whi!~ 40% 46°~ 29~ Hispanic ~5% 38% 27% ~8~]~ 56% ~0~; Native ~ed~n 1% 3~; 5 Asian/Pacific Islan~ 0"~ 1% 5% Un~no~ 2°/; 5% ~7% ~ 4% o-5 20% o% 0% 0% ~18 22% 20% - ~607; 23% - !P~ 65% 60% - NOT IN SCHOOL 27% 19% .... Re ative/Fdends 26% 31% 18% 31% .~ ~6% Mqtel Shelter 39% 34% 18% D% - 9% Car~an/E~c. 16% 11% 12% ~8% - 5% Vaunt B dg 8% 4% 0% 19% ~ 0% Outsj~e 10% 20% 36_% ~ ~; : 36% Othe~ 0% ~ 15% 8% - 14~ Lost Job 213 110 70 N/A N/A N/~ illnes~ 57 46 46 N/~ N/A N/A Evict~ ! ~ 8 136 51 N/~ N/~ Moved/No wore 70 40 13 NIA N(A N/~ Lost Benefits 30 26 10 N/A Asked to Leave 78 9~ Ncohol/Drug 209 ~ 58 N!A N/A N/A Domestic Violence 28 15 N/A N/A N)A N/A Rental Sold or Condemned 14 18 p.04 N/~ Sourcer February 1992 and November 1992 San Bemardi_no Count, Homeless CoaliUon.Surveys and Ma~' 1993 CeJ fora a State Polyte _chp_c ~)pivemity S u_ry_ey HOMELESS.*N~:Eb~ The ex;tenJ of the po~dJ~tiOh {h~,~iS ~heJterea ~;em~s UnsheiJered ~es'be~eh su~ey i-~s~l~, ir[ all surveys, the number of individuals without shelter whether sleeping in cars, vacant buJ!dings, or outside is fairly high. Of the shelters operating in the area, those that offer extended length of sta~; or support services generally limit assistance to family households, while emergency shelters generally operate on a first come first serve basis. Service providers indicate that fewer Hispanic jndividqa!.s_ ~iJ! se_ek_ he!ter s_ s!st_a..n be~a~use ~ey g_ff_e~ Ee!y o,n_ 9 fa_~j!y.gr _cg~..m, Bejty D~._Nt/.9~ Page 15 City of Rancho Oucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan SUBPOPULATI.~$ A~ ~aiysib Of {~ii~,' ~ype~ ~nd~u~>~p~p~iati~>~S'0f inS¢~d~al~ ~{iii~ng ~h~A~aila~i~ s~'ei~'~ a~8 se~ices is provided the three most significant factom cited were job loss, eviction, and al~hol/dmg use. The nature of the population repoded is dependent upon the ph osophy and pmct ~s of the paAicular shelter provider. For example, Pomona Valley Council of Churches and Foo~ill Family Shelter tends to provide transitional shelter sewices to ~o parent fam lies w · children. S gnifi~nt pmpo~ions of ~ose assisted through ama sheltem were identified as single Parent or ~o parent families With children. It is only in mom Iong-s~nding organi~fions that appear to assist a large~ propo~ion of single individuals ~n~ .even iq ~a~ ~se the ng~!.o~ wq~en a~si.~t~ teq~ t~ oq~eigh th~. nu~b~ g~ m~Je~ RURAL HOMEL~SS~FARM~qRKE_R~ As a consequence of the small population and rapidly declining agricultural production, no statisticai need for housing has been identified for rural homeless or farmworkers. According to the 1990 Census, there were 357 persons working in farming, forestry, and fishing occupations, or less than 1% of the 50,963 total employed persons living in the City. There is no information with which to desegregate farmworkers from the identified occupations. Based on an absence of agricultural pmd~uction in the ~!_ty, it_i~s as~u.~e_ d~ that t.h@re ~re ve_ry~few !~divid__u_a[_s d~ ~p~.n_~erl~ ~p~q s~c~.jp_bs~ The at-dsi( popuiaiion ~s'(Jefine(~ ~S' rente[; hous~hold-s With i~ome~ belo~ 3b~O~°f {'h~ area median income and paying more than 30% of their income on housing with no support such as the Section 8 Rental Assistance Program. A total of 9% of all renter households and 3% of all owner-occupied households have incomes below 30% of the area median (see Table 1). Seventy-eight percent of all extremely Iow-income households have a housing cost burden greater than 30% (see Table 5)., By tenancy, 83% of all extremely Iow-income renters have a housing cost burden. This group is most in need of affordable rental housing, but unfortunately, housing for this income bracket is limited because large subsidies needed to bdng rents down to affordable levels. Much of the Redevelopment Agency 20 Percent Set-Aside` _funds a~re u~l!zed. _towprd p~vi~ding P~orda_ b!_e _hou~ng pni~ts fqr pe~og~ at th!s~.jn~c0~me !e_ve!~ ~/ar~6us ~{~t~i ~ou~, ar~ persons with spe. cia! needs, Appepdix B co.n_ta!ns a !j.st. o_f agePc_es.~aAd CEy of Rancho Cucamongs Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan Table 8: ' of Persons Assisted ~PROGRAM~ ~A$~i-~t:u ~ .v pERCENT BREAKDOWN! ~ I otals~ ~ To=i HOPE 600 Em~ S~ 20 22 4 2 ~1 ~ Pomona Valley 5130 ~o~ Councillor ..... Emg ~h [14 ~ ~ Food ~ ~ 30 ' ~ 2~ ~humhes -Tmns ' ~113 House of Rut~ ~ Tota ...... smgsh AS ~5 Trans ~0 9~ ~ Food ~ F~ ~00 Foothill Family 35 ~0ta S~ivation Arm~ ~6 ~otal Youch~ 33 3~ 3~ r Prevent 30 ~ ~ 5 Humani~ Hs , -'- s.B, Coun~ ~ shel{e~ ,100 Homeless ' .... - / Men~lly, I!! Pmgmm S~-Single ~ult Male; S~ ng e ~u t Female; SP W/CH-Single ~amnt wi~ Chitdmn; 2P WICH.T~ Parent Family~ C~ildmn; ~ult Couples ~ Chiidmn; S~ingle Male (~th Under 18;'S~-Single Female You~ Under 18; ME~M~n~[ly III ~N~0~r ping ~dJ~e~ ~!Y ME & ~en~liy III and N~hqFO~e[p~g ~d.c~d ~ol_e0~ ND~plagnese~ ~ NDS or Re a~d D seases Page 17 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan A la-r-g~'l~ropc~r~on ot'tl~ ~id-e~ ~)~)pulation is in ~ ~dwl~ethe-r-~on~r~-i~a'~y-(~-¥h~o-u{]~ so~-~ dependency. The 1990 Census identified a total of 5,082 persons over the age of 65 in Rancho Cucamonga.. According to national pementages, approximately 14.4% of all seniors are considered frail elderly, defined as having at least one Activity of Daily Living (ADL) limitation. Based upon tha{ percentage 433 elderly-renter households and 646 owner households were identified as requiring some type of housing assistance. It is estimated that 63 of these !owe_r-in_c9~ ~.e, .r.ente. r and_ 93 o_wner hou_seh~lds_ ~re~i~. ~eed o.f a_ssis~.n~e~ Yhere ~-re a ~'ignih~ant n-umJ:)e~: o~ eiderJy~ and ~ail e-lder~y~n(Jividdais'~h6 ~e ~iv~ se~ices ~om ama organizations. Demog~phics cleaHy show that the eldeHy population in need rapidly increasing, bemuse of the fact that the population is generally ~g~g~d t~at p~opLe living longer. The needs ofthe elderly am related to four main issues: · Income: People over 65 am usually retired and live on a fixed in.me,.. · Health Cam: Elderly generally have a higher rote of illness and dependency. ~ · Tmnspo~tion: Many seniom use public tmnspo~tion; however, ~ eldedy have disabilities and require alternative means of transpo~. · Housing: Many elderly live alone and rant Those that J]ve ~n ~h~i~~'' ~o~e~ unab!~ tg ~ ~ ~f mutin~, maiqten~n~ and TJ~e-t~(~usi-ng 'n'~e~J~- ~{-th~ ~lde~ -~r~d-p-~r~ons ~;ith-~lisa biiit~ w-h~' ~'~6]~S-~I~ ~t~-se~¥c~s,' include access to health care, grocery stores, pharmacies, and a convenient economical means of transportation. Housing programs available to help the City's eldedy include rehabilitation assistance through the Home Improvement Program, continued enforcement of the Ci~s Senior Housing Overly Zone and it's provisions, as the development o_f future s_e.n, ipr _h_ggsjng thr0~g.h. Re_development_ Agengy's~ 20 _P.ercent Set-Aside fupds_, GeneraJ natJo~al-es'~ima~s i'n(J[ca~e th~{ i % of t~e ad~it pop~ia~io~-m'~e~'~-~fin~'~{~ men~l illness on the basis of diagnosis, duration, and disabili~. This indi~tes that approximately 1,126 Rancho Cucamonga residen~ may have a severe men~l disabili~. The nationally ac~pted percentage of the population that can be ~tegorized as developmen~lly disabled is 1% ~ 3%J This figure is published by the Association for Re~rded Citizens. Thus, be~een 1,126 and 3,378 individuals in Rancho Cu~monga may be developmentally disabled. An estimated 6,740 Rancho Cu~monga residents had wo~, mobiliS, or self-care disabilities in 1990. If~e estimated numbem of ~ese populations that am men~lly or developmen~lly disabled am subtracted from the to~ estimated disable~ pgpqlati~n, ~h~n b~e~p 4,488 ~nd ~,23~ PhYS~ ~b~ ~her~arethre-~ d~ffe~n{ t~p~'0f-di~-~ied-~pe~sons with W~ n ~-h 0'b~sir~'g'fi~ ~d s,~ ~ d~-~;~pm~[~; disabled, the physically disabled, and ~e men~lly disabled. These throe groups, especially ~eir Iow-income membem, often share a ~mmon housing need during the restoration process from a serious disabili~. This may range from requiting institutional ~re to facilities allewing fo~ pa~ial complete independence. This need is flint to have a transitional group qua~em ~at includes on-site professional or paraprofessional suppo~. The second common need is to have ve~ Iow- or Iow~ cost housing when the individual no longer requires institutional or group suppo~. Social Sewi~ pmfess~g0~_l~ agree ~h~ qf these ~9 ho~sing peed~ ~he n~e~ fgr ~rge~ City of Rancho Cucarnonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan Ho~Js]ng-neea~-of the di-sab~led-~re further c~mpo6nded b~ deAign and- i0cat~°~ ~qui~-emen[s thai may be more costly, Special needs of households with wheelchair-bound or semi-ambuiatory indiViduals for example, may require ramps, holding bars, special bathroom designs, wide.~, doorways, lower cabinets, and elevators. Housing opportunities for individuals with disabilities can' be addressed through the provision of affordable, barrier-free housing. Rehabilitation assistance can be targeted toward diSabled renters and homeowners for unit modifications to impro_v~e ~cCesSib![ity~ ._A~_ce_ssi_bl_e~h _ousi~g may alsq be previde~_ t_hmugh_ s~e~io._. ? h@u_si~g._deyel~p.rn._en__~.~ Yhe-san ~e-r~ardin&' cYf~ce"~(AicOt~Oi A~d D~gs i~d~{ed ~at 1 ~U~ ~e~ 16 p%~ons' ~a-'~ be~me an al~hol or drag abuser. Consistent with the potentially la~e number of individbals in ~e population that may have d~g or al~hol problems, the number of se~ice agencies and sheite~ beds to assist pemons with alCohol and/or drag abuse far ou~umber ~ose available to other spedal needS groups. Affordable housing oppodunities for individuals, whose lives have been ove~helmed by their addictions, ~S ~e~l ~s eady in~e~e~gp ~e~en~ co~fin~ ~o ~j~pg~p~ ~0 p~ey~[ h~n ~s~. FE M~L_E;_H. EA~E~b H~ U_ ~ OL~D~ Sih~,e 1-98b; 5.9% of all households in 1980 to 9.2% in 1990. The number of female-headed single parent households (7%) far exceeds the number of male-headed single parent households (2.2%) although the proportions in both Catego~d_e~ h~e_ ir~qrea, se_d. !.n 1~8~0, !~-3~ ._o~' si~g!e- parent t!pu~e.he!ds w~re maJe a_nd 4,6~ w~r~e TI~ Jn(~om~ JeWels'of sin~'J& ~)aie~, Whe~,F male o~: f~m~je, g~b~:al~falJ beJ(~ tl~e~a~b'~ed-i~ income with females being significantly lower, The mean income in 1989 of a male head of household, without a spouse but with children, was $34,781, while the mean income for female head of household, without a spouse but with children, was $27,813. The median income for the Riverside/San Bernardino area was $37,273, while the median income for the City was $46,193~ The mean income for the City was $51,841. In addition to female-headed single-parent households generally earning a lower income, a la~er proportion of these households have incomes below poverty level. Single parent families with children under the age of 18, 65 male households (9.9~) ~are be{ow pov_ec~y Jgy_e!, w~i!e 3~ fem@le .hea_ded hopseho!.d.~ (18,~%) ~m belg.w pqv~e~ leYe!. [~a rg~e' fa~iii~are Cor~pr~Sed'of f~ve Or more pers0n~.-T~S~ (a~il~s ~ep~e~-~0~Si~-~cem~ bemuse of the difficul~ in finding adequate-sized housing units and their resulting higher ~st.: These ~arge families suffer dispmpodionately from overcrowding and an inabili~ to pay. In 1980,., there were approximately 2,723 large families representing 16% of the Ci~s ;households, ~ were mnter~upied uni~. The overall pmpodion of large families decreased slightly from 16% in 1980 to 15.1% in 1990. The share of large ~i~'[q mn~r 9~p~ ~ni~ h~ ~ocrea~d ~ig~j~q~y ~mm ~!?/~ 1~ tq ! !,2% i.~ 1~90. Table 9: Famil~' --T~r~u~ ~-i§8b-~J-~i9{)'~ City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-200g Consolidated Plan ¥0T I 2~723 I 16:0 I $,0§4 I ~1-S~i~ Source: t 980 a~d ! ~90 ~c~ qsu~s PUBLIC ~OUSlN-~ ~,~idehts Tqual--ifyin-~-~r- p-~ubii~h-mJ~i~g ~re -I-ow-income~-P~y' r~or~ {har~ 5-0% o{ housing, or live in substandard units. These individuals are at significant dsk for homelessness.~ Often, the receipt of housing subsidies are not adequate to ensure that these individuals will be able to obtain permanent hoUsing on their own at some future date. Additional supportive serviCes should be provided to assist individuals in many areas including job training, budgeting, and home maintenance. The Housing Authority of San Bemardino County provides programs as possible,' such as resident training and family self-sufficiency. As of July 1, 1999, there were 16 public housing households in the City and 170 Section 8 residents... Th_er~ is_ _a wa!_ti~ng liszt ~.r b_0~ programs jndicatj_ng.a c_on~t[n_ qed. ~eed. f0~r !.o_w-iqcq~e h~u__s_0g~ As ~andate~d ~n'~h~ ~eside~i~i'L'ea(J-~ased Paint Hazard ~eduction Ac{~'~ ~2; j~d'~[~t~)n~-a~e required to identify and consider preventative measures to remove lead hazardS. Those typically at greatest risk for lead poisoning are lower income families with children in older rental properties that are poody maintained, The number of lower inCOme renter and owner occupied units that are estimated to have lead-based paint is provided. It should be noted that the presence of lead-based paint is of itself not a hazard, unless the paint is in poor condition. It does present a la_tent or potentia! problem that _may, at some tutu_re ti.me, be .r_e!e~.as_e~ ~nd ca.. u_s~ _ha_.rr~; Ta-I~le 10: ~J;2~Tenur ~;~umber of Low and Mod?.rate~; ~ ~ Eshmated Number of Households with~;~ ~? ~ ~ Income Households ~ ~ ' ~ ~:'' ~ ~ ;~ ~ Lead-Base~ Pa~p~ Renter 1,469 ~ Owner 1,214 77~ TOT~ 2 68~ ~l;~d Source: ~HAS patabo~k Ta~b[e 9, ! ~90 CensUS There-we~'e a'{(~{ai of 3~,;I-~7 hOusing unit~-in R~n~ho cu~nonga in 199~'~,~;i'9-3-i-n 1{)9~ i{- estimated that 4.8% of those units existing in 1990 have lead-based paint present. Of occupied rental units, 9.7% are estimated to have lead-based paint, and 3.3% of owner occup'ed un'ts a~ estimated to have lead-based paint. A breakdown of the number of units by age available to Iow- income families estimated to have lead-based paint is provided. The majority of the units.fall in th~ age category from 1960 to 1979 and it is possible that _.m__apy _o.f these .up[~_s a_re_ s_tjl_l and t_herefore do not pmse_nt__a_n !m~ediate h~_rcl.~ Estimated to Have Lead-Based Paint 9 of Unit AGE OF UNITi~ Pre !940 ~ 1 1940-1.959 18~ ~7 i960-19~9 ~18 TOT~ 974 SoU~; (~HA.S.Databq. qk Table City of Rancho Cucaroonga Cornrouni~y Developroent Block Grant Program 2005~2009 Consolidated Plan There areb~o local pubiiC'fi~alYh C~re ager~cies that deai primarily with ~h~ldh0~)d lead i~°~sonin(~, the San Bemardino County Department of Public Health Child Health and Disabilities Prevention Program (CHDP) and California Children's Services (CCS). These two agencies coordinate efforts to identify, treat, and assist lower income families. Programs provided through this agency are available to children whose families are on welfare or have incomes within 200% of the poverty level. CHDP works with area physicians as pad of a physician referral program for blood testing. If a child is identified with an elevated blood lead level (10ug/dl or greater) CHDP provides follow-up; treatment, education, and information. If a child has two blood draws that are over 15ug/dl then CHDP investigates the home. Samples are taken and results are sent to the homeowner along with a list of individuals to contact to abate the problem. If a child has a blood lead level over 20ug/dl then. they aFe_ referFe_d to Califo_ rnia C__hi!d_ren's_ S _e_rvices, (CCS), ~ho then pro._vi~_e ~_se managem~_n~ City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan YE.UeE' p' Z_E OF U"ifS Rousin~ gro~th ~0re than ~ou'bied between 1980 and-'~90. A~ntal hou~ng-ir~c~e~J~l~{~0~eVer the ten-year pedod as compared to an 89% increase in owner occupied housing in the same time period. While owner-occupied housing accounts for the majority of the housing stock, the amount decreased from 83% in 1980 to 70% in 1990. Renta hous ng _wt~h ~ve_ qr ~_o. re u_n!~ i.~_ased. ~ 30.1% !r~ ! 980. to _54.7% i_n ! 990.' ..... Table i2: ...... Uh~{s - 1980 and 1990 ~;~ '~ ~;;?~ ...... -~ Owner O,ccupied ~!!;~ :~ :-' ' ~ Renter Occupmd~' , 1980 , 1990 ~-~. ' "; Hous ng Type : . ,~;:~; NO. oyo - NO oy, NO. Y": NO~, ~ ~pgi~ Fami!yD~tach~ i 1,381 91.9 20,219 85.5 ~';~64 53,0 g,~28 SJngJe Fam}ly Afia~ & 175 i.~ 1,~ 7.8 ~50 !~.~ !,~ 24 unit~ 5 or More Units 22~ !,8 ~ !,0 775 30~1 5,471 MObile Homes 7i2 5.~ 1,256 5.3 89 ~.¢ 7~ ~.7 Othe¢ 0 0.0 87 0.3 0 ~ 9~ TOT~ 12,493 83.0 23,638 70.0 ~,558 i7.0 9,99i 3q Source; 1980.and 1990 Federal Censqs The o-ver~il vaca~(~y raie inc~:~ased fi'om 4.8% in ~198~ to 7.5% ~' 1990. in'i§90, the vacancy rate for buildings with two or five or more units was significantly higher than for other unit types. These higher rates may have been caused by a lag for market absorption of newly constructed units, Ideally, .the rent;er qccupied vacancy _rate sh~ould_ be 5.0% and the owner occupied_ m..te_s_h_ou.]~ b..e 2.00,~. Table 13 1980 and 1990 ' ~;;~:~:;' ~,~,~ , ~':, :To al Units :%. ' Vacant Units: ' . ,,;Vacancy Rats~": unl;_/ype.~j~ 1980:.,, 1990 1980 · 1990 1980~ : 19901?/ SF Detached ~5,175 24,52i 728 ".1 4.69 4..8 `6.~ SI~ Attached 250 2 2~.8. 58 147 23.0 2 Units 95 lO0 7 1! 7.3 ~1.~ 3 & 4 Units ~12 1,J66 33 46 i0.5 ~.~ 5+ Un!ts 1,i13 `6 810 .28 i,O15 2~.5 Mobile Home~ 894 1,34_6 6 ~6 ,0.6 Source_: 1980 and 1990 Census; ~S ~CAG Su~m~ma_ryTape File Page 22 Ci~y of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan Hobs % Between ~ §8-0-;199~ ~r~)~ in {he housing stoc-k-kept p~ce ~,~th the City's 'h0use~ld'g~-0~th-~l~ing the same period. Thero are mismatches between the City's housing needs based on housing size and supply of housing units. _T~he_Le !_s eP inadequate supply of sme!! size (1 .for :s_m. alJ_o~q~r hg~s_e_hgldS_: No. o Number of'~i~:;::;- i~'Number~ ~Number of Un,t ~Difference betweeo~ Pero ;Households ~;of Bdrms ~ ~ ~ ~Households &Un ~ ~ Owner~~ Rente~ ~~ ~ ~: ~,80~ 2,623 0-~ 61~ 3 96~ .2,190 ~,~ 2 ~,282 2,988 2 3,328 4,114 ~2,~ ~1,1~6 ~+ ~14,5~ 4,386 3+ 20 6~0 3,088 +~ ~!,298 Sourqe: CH_AS.Da~ Book TapJ9 3 an~d 1990 ~en~su~ AP~0xir~t~l~, 6~:3~/o ~)~ ~li unit~ fi~V~-tfir"ee or mor~'bed~0om-s. 'By un~it t~pe; ~4-o7o- o'f ~il 0wr~r~n~t~ have three bedrooms, and 28% of rental units have 3 or more bedrooms. Of the r~e[n!ng r_e.n~_l units_, there !s an ~q.ual s_p!it betw_een _th_e nu. mbe_r qf .one .and _t?q ~e.~rgo ~m AGE ~F_HO'U~I~G- S'I'_O~_K A~)l~roxima{ely 56% o{ ali housing ~nit~ in the city Were bL~ilt ~fle~-1~9~9:~ith-95a?o of ali Gnits 6dilt since 1960. As a result, the general condition of the housing stock is good and should continue to provide adequate housing. Appendix E, Map 1, illustrates the distribution of the housing stock by age as based on 1980 Census Block Groups. Concentrations of housing stock in age categories from 1975 or eadier are typically located in specific areas, however, there aro individual older uni~ scattered throughout the City. The aroa with a concentration of units bqi!~@d.o? t_o_ ;!_9~9~_!S. .a_.l_s~ !_n .aX area 'Lhat hes .a ~igh. cgnc~Qtmtipn of m!nodty, Iow-i.n. ~com~mosi.cle. p_ts. Tota Un ts, Percent of Numbe~ ~,. ~ ~ ~,~:~;~: · ~ ~.,:~:~ ~ Total Vacant~:~ ;,Occupied; ~Occup'ed !990:!99~ 5,024 ~.2 NLA ~ N~A 19~0:198~ 20,07~ 48.7 2.!7~ 6,T2~ ~,~ '19~0-!97~ 11249 ~.3 455 2, 5i 1949-1~5~ 1,?~ 2:9 6~ 1~0-1~9 ~25 Pre i940 470 1 .~ 40 ! ~ ~98 TOT~ 41 193 i00 2,732 ~,99~ ~3'6~ P~e23 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan 1990-1999 1999 Age of Housing Stock by Year Built Before 1940 1940-49 1.2% 0.8% 1950.59 2.9% 1960-69 6.9% 1970-79 27.3% 1980-89 48.7% Large proportions of residents in older rental housing are lower mco~_a.n_d m~ay _be p_qte__n, tj_aJ~ly !ess~ ~b~!~e to a~qrd ~roHtip. e.. ~_a_!~te~a_r~c,~_. aqd .repai__ ~m..to th_e.r 31e 16: Stock ~ Year Bu t~ ~-:~0 ¥o Lower Income - Renter,s; ~i~< ~ Lower ncome - Owner~ Pre !94(! 58' 19~0-195.9. ~ ~960-1979 ~ ~oqrce: CHAS Data_bqo~ k~ '[a~bl_e 9~, 19~p F~ed~e~! C~e_nsU~ S_UBSTANDARD ~U_NIT.S SU!TABL.E' F_O~R R~EHA~!_L.I.~TATIO~ Standards of the Section 8 Rental Assistance Program and/or the City of Rancho Cucamonga Housing Code. While it is not possible to determine the nbmber of units that meet this criteria exactly, the number of units may be estimated by evaluating specific factors that would indicate that a unit does not meet the above criteria. In determining the number of units that are substandard, it was assumed that all substandard units are occupied by Iow- and moderate-income ;households.' Factors used in th~ assessment included the estimated incidence of lead based paint, lack o~ complete plumbing facilities, lack of complete kitchen facilities, lack of any heating fuel, and units that were vacant and boarded up. These amounts were then divided into estimated categories of renter versus owner and Iow- and moderate-income. These factors can only give an estimate of the number of units that ~ ~ay~e ~su_b~s_ta_n..da~ and m9£~ t_ha_q 0~e su_b~s~ta~_a, rd.. ?a_~tg_r ~_aY ~ P~_s.e_~t in. ~a sing!~e .re.._s[~de.n.~; Page 24 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan ~Sg- u'roe-: 2. CHAS Databo0k Table 9 and HUD Technical Bulletin #% 1990 Federal Census. Percent EL and L Income based on CHAS Tables 5 Part and Part 8 · ~'4'~ . .. 1990 Federal Census, PercentageofRentersandOwnersceiculatedbased0noye_ml_l~i~p~p0~o_q'(~-_R~ 70% O); Percent EL and L income based on CHAS Tables 5 Part and P~rt I~ ~ - ~i_- ' A~_s_sumptio__n ~a~ 8~3% p~f~. Uq ~.arp ~.q_ta~.p_~[ rehabilita_fi~.~ in (~rd~e~io~ti~a{e th~*numl~er 0~ Ur~iWt-h~t a~ ~ubst~dar~-~u~ Su-itabie fo~-r~h~a~i~t~i(~nl ~h~san~ proportion was used that had been used previously in the City's Housing Assistance Plan 83%. The definition of those units that are substandard but suitable for rehabilitation is that the value of the improvements will not exceed 80% of the loan__t~o value m~@.o_.f~e_ BB~t w~it_h ~_x__ce~ p~o.n.s~ Possible !~_tb_e..ca_se o.f'a h!S_tgricpl_ly_S!gqi~_pl[ st_~-.ctpm~ · . Th-~ 1 ~0 ~:e~- sho~ {ha~ the'm~(~i~-~ ~:-0st of a ~-ous~ i~ :t~e Ci{y W~ -$ i~?~3~§2~ ~ ~t~e'*~lT~r~ income was $46,193, The cost of homeownership has increased during the last 10 yearn due tq population increases (e.g., higher demand) and inflation. The increase in the pdce of housing has a ~irect effect on housi~ng a~ffgr_dab~!~,- Th~ ~effect on_ !0W- a_~ n~mte-!~_o_~e- iP~e iS pLways sign.ifi_can~ ~n~ ~Ja-n-~l:y-l~9b;-an-,J-M~-~h-'~§'9-3:-~h~ (~ity c~n-~t~ a-s~r~y*'0f 32 ~'el~ta-J-p-I:'(~C~:' '~V-her~ compared with the HUD Fair Market Rent Schedule for the Riverside-San Bemardino PMSA, uppe{ end rents in Rancho Cucamonga are generally higher, although, Fair Market Rents do fall within the rent ranges for each type of unit. The res_u!t_ gf ~!_s.!~ ~h.a_~ !~djvidu_a!s iq ygqc_h_e~r p~g~_m..~s_.m_a~y have' ~some_ di~cu_l~.fin.~i~ng qq_a.!i~ng q.n.!_tsj Page 25 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan Table 18: Rent Rat · ~ '~ 9 ~i~, 1999 FMR:- [~:January 1990;~j iJ_anuary 1993 ;; 1991 FMR~,:. ,~ 1 Bachelor 4!0-595 430~50 ~3~ 1-bedroom 450-7~ 46q-7~0 51~ ~, 2-bedr00m ~50-750 530-850 602 3-bedroom ~6~795 ~0-850 7~ ~83 ~5 ~-bedroom 625-~75 760-1,025 ~7~ ~ ,~ ~99 Uanu~c{u~e~ N/A N/~ 24~ ~/~ Sgurce: City of ~pncJl~ o Cucamopga pla~ni.r~g pivisioq AVAILABILI'~'~ OF Ho'UslNb T~)"LowE_R iNcOME H0USEH~sLD.s The following ide~tifies t~os~'units' availa~l~ to {/ado~s IoWer:i'h~',ome-categ0~i~S ba-se-d-~3~ ~he annual contract rent or mortgage at the time of the 1990 Census. There were relatively few units available to extremely Iow- and Iow-income households and even fewer three-bedroom units available· Much has changed on the economic scene since 1990 a~d i~.i~ estimated t_h,ata/.aarge_~ proportion of t_he hqu_siqgstoc~ is available to lower in_come families. Table 19: Housin Affordabilit)/Table n come'~;/'L~ ~!~ ~ig -; : No of Un ts * "~o of Households inch ~ ,.~. ...... ~ ~.': .... Affordable ~ Income Level ~ -, ,~,, ~.: Extremely Low (0~30%) ~80 ~.5. 8~ Low (31-50%) 732 189_5 -1 ! Moderate (51-8_0~ 3808 ~724 +8~ Housing Housing available to those ~n extremely Iow (0-30 ~) and Iow (31-50 Yo) ~ncome households ~s very limited. While the City does have a "surplus" of housing units ~v~i!~bl~ ~q.~9,derat~e in_co .m.e 80%), these.wo~!d more likely benefit those, at higher incomes~ T~bie 20: Uhits Avaiiabi~ Based on C~)ntmct-Rent, ' - '¢¢~,., ¢ ,. ........ ~:;' :: OWNER INCOME ~ ;':,;~:.; ;~...~¢:~ ~.,~ ~ ~.,~ RENTER INCOME ;., ~,. 1 Bed~O0m 30 i01, 149~ 2~ 2f ~,~ 2 Be~rooms 10~ ~8 8¢~ 78 ~9g 47~ 3 B~r~ms 60 57 ~8Q ?~ ~57 ~4X 1 Bearo0~ 7 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ Source; CHAmp .a~.a~bogk T.a~le ~, !9_90 ~u~ AVAILABILITY OF HOUSING _Fp~ THOSE W_ITH $.P~E~L_ NEEP,S DI~BLE~ Page 26 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan Since 197~,'the Uniform Building C0de~UBC), Title 24,has required han~Ji~,ap*~'cces~ibility~n'r~l~-" unit residential projects. The UBC requires that all ground floor single-story units, in which there are less than three units per building, make all units handicap accessible. The 1993 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADAI allows that disabled persons may make reasonabLe_mgdi~_cp~fiop_s.t_o ~py re~_ta_! u_nit prqvi_ded_ ~a_t _*anY cha_nge_s b_e rev`e_rs!b]_e at th_e cost_ Of .th.`e _ten~,t, There are several facilities available to either eldedy or frail eldedy residents with units that held available to Iow-income seniors through the establishment of development agreements entered into at the time of project` _apprpya_!,_ The following is a list of th_e_se projects _and_ ~t.h.`e n. um.._be~r p.f un. its 9.r spaces availab e.. Pr-oi~ct Description and Loc~tion Total No. Of Uni{~ NO, of Low Incom~ 0nits Active Senior Apartment Complexes Rudolph Henddckson 16_8 ....... !68~ 662_8 Amethyst A¥@n.~e~ 9601 Lo_mira_ Cpurt Villa ............. Pacifica ~581 ......... !~ B~se Lip.e Road Retirement Homes Villa Del Rey 8_825 Base Ljn`e Ro~ad, ~onvales~ent' i~sp~ta~J ............ Alta Loma Coq¥~l`es_cent` ....... .59 ~ed ~3.33 L._a Mes~ Elderly Residential Home Care Walnut Grove Manor 5572_ Amethy.st A_venu~ Ma~is 9669 Ohe °ption~'a~/ailable t6 aSsist eJ~Je-rl~, a~n~l/o~ ~isabJ~0 Pe~s°n~ ~'r;nain-in*-~e~r-~o~n~s i~ 0~ered through the Oldtimers Foundation funded through the City's CDBG program,, _OI.d-ti~.m.`e.rs pro_v[d_e~ mi. nor hpme aqd ~mergen, cy repa]m tq Iowe_r-incqm`e jn.dMdt~.al~s PER_SO. NS w!TR H~IV/A!d~ ~he 6a-sic heed 0{th°se Wit~ HIV}AibS~ an~J -theJ~:{am~lie's i~-t~-h'A~/~ a~tb*rd~6ie-hod~ing, Providing this housing becomes difficult because of the progressive nature of the disease. Housing available includes existing conventional housing that ~aY be. _su.b~]d-i_zed_by.a_g`e_ncies_su_Ch a.s !._n~,.a.~ Aid~ project (!Ap) on .a s_h_o~-te.~rm, bas[s; Page 27 City of Rancho Cucarnonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan J=ami~ie~-wit~-c-hi~dren g~neraily-reciuire unit~ Wit-h-~ g~e-a{e~ ~u~nbe~ Census, 28% of the occupied rental stock had three or more bedrooms. The HUD Fair Market rent for three bedroom units in 1999 was set at $845, potentially out of the reach to lower income rente~ families. There are relatively fe_w th.re~-.bedrp~.u_n_!ts.~vaila_b!~t~!gW.a_.n_~l.~0~eraJ~!~0_om.~ ~nd. owne~re.(~e~ Ta_b!_e' ~2_): Ame~d'ments t~) t~e-Fair I~d~Jn'~-Act of 1988 'm~e i{ ilia-gal t(~ d~'~(~H-m~n~te-a'g~n~t-~-e~0n~ Base-d on familial status. Information provided Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board indicates that discrimination may occur against families with children under the appearance of such things as occupancy, location, and type of head of household. Families may be restricted to having less than two persons per bedroom and they may be prevented from locating on the second floor under the appearance of safety concams. Managers may also discriminate .again§t- a J_e ~m~!~ h_e~ qf h0u.sehpld w_!t~b children., as this !s not a tr_adition.al _fa_m_By LoW-INcoMF ~N_D .P'~.~ cI~E'I:" NJC_ C0NCENTRATION_S !NCOM. E I~ 1§90, the'me(~ia~ in~:or~ of Ranct~° (~uCar~nga ~:esidenJ~N-a~ ~:~ ~-~d $~7~73 {oF~ Rivemide-San BemardinO ama. Approximately 21% of all households in ~e Ci~ ~uld be class~ as Iow- and moderate-income in '1989. For all racial/ethnic ~tegodes o~er than white, the percen~ge of Iow- and moderate-income residen~ exceeded that of the Ci~s average, wi~ Blac~ having the highest per~n~ge of lower income households (28%), followed by Hispani~ (27%)~ Asian and Pacific Islandem (26%), and Native A.~e~PS (~3°~)~ !P~m~ ~is~gfi~q and ~h~ ~n b.~ fu~her ~n.~idem~ b~e~ gpon t.e_~p~y Table ~ RENTER ~2;~ ~ -, OWN ER' (~,~, {~ ~ ~r0~0 31 50~ 51-80~. : o~ ~ . ~,~,,-~,~ o ~ o ~ · ~, O~OYo ~ . 3!~0%. Total 9,0 ~:7 18.9 ~,G 4:0 Minori~ ~2.2 :12,~ 21.4 ~.5 5.4 Black ?.0 . ~:~ 25:i: ~:'6 ~ ~.0 Hispan C 13.7 ! ~3 21.3 4.0 ~.~ SqurC~_; CHAS. _Data. bo0k Talkie 6, 1990 C~.~ nsu~ There ~re ~ixi~len~ed iew-i~co~ne target areas in the'C][y, fi~'a~'ea~de~ignati~ ~r~based ~n ~ 1990 Census (see Appendix E, Map 2). The sixth, Monte Vista Street, was qualified by special survey in May 1995. Areas of iow-income concentration are defined as those Census Block Groups, where the percentage of Iow-income households exceeds 33.07% (based on HUD's area median' income determination and the quartile method determination). In areas _whe~r.e ~p.e.c~! §u_ry_ _e.y_s ~a_r~ condu_c_te(~, 51°/_o. qr ~more of Lh.e [?si~dents a_re iden.ti~e_d.. _a§ !o_w:iqcpme_: Ta~ie ~2:- - :i9{)b C~-nsus ~JO~:~ ~:o~ ~d Low:in~:ome 5is~{ribu{io~ ' ~; ~ Percent Low- ncome . ~ -. ,.,,;.,o,=o .,,~,~. ~- ~ ~ ~, Bock Grou~ ~i:00 6 74,45 Page 28 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan 1 I 2 ,00 .69j Department of Housing and Urban Development, 1990 Census The City be eves that the data gathered for th s Census Bock Group was~p~ 9 -n'°[, a~n~i~-~is a_~ d~9_e~ n~a.~q~a]~ ~ iow-income taR]et area as it is all new large lot development. In accordance with Section 570.208(a)(1 )(.) of the Federa CDBG regu a~ons, soncem ng ~e. qua~l_p~, a!lb ~ grOUps w!th 33 07°~,~ or g..rpater cqpcentratJop o[ Iow.income ppEul~tJ, o~ pre qualifip_d ~rg e_t~re~s~ A~ 6t 19'~0~i~ere'-~v-er~ 5,5i6 persons in the Ci~ iden{ifiec~ ~s 66'Jng 66iow p0vedy ie'V6'l. "Chis represents 5.6% of all persons for whom poverty status has been determined. Of those ~dent~fied, 41% were male and 59% were female. Poverty status is defined as the average annual income for a family of four below $12,674 in~ 1990 and $23,60_0 jn 199~9~. Th_!_S!~ .~ pa.t_iqBal figu.m, wi_th n~ adjustment, s_ .for reg!qna! q~r Co_~t.o_.f !ivi~g vafiatig~_s; Both male and fe~male p~rs0ns for whom poverty s{atus i.s determined {i~6~ §~t~ the~ges'&f 0~ 17 years have a higher proportion of persons below poverty level. In all age categories, females have a greater pementage of perso_n~ _below pore..rty level w!t~ the highest, propqrti0P .fo.u_n~ [o.r~ w0meq 6_.5 y_e.p~ _anted old_er.. City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Pn~gram 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan 12- 10- 8- 0-17 18-64 65+ tel Male · Female Cify of Rancho Cucamonga CommuniO/ Development Block Grant Program 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan Uino~ popUl_~atjo~_ n_cr_ePse_d by ! 0% ~rg.rn 2~1.3~?_o ~p _19_8~0 tq 3~1.~% !,n !99q.~ 1980 ETHNICiTY/P, ACE White 78.9% Black 2.5% 1990 ETHNICITY/RACE Black Hispanic American Indian, Asian & Pacific Islander 5.9% Ot~er 0.2% Cib/ of Rancho Cucamonga Communfiy Development Block Grant Program 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan Ther~ are'15'bloCk-g~'oups in which the'~inbrity con~entratibfi exceeds the ~it,~vicie-{0t~l r~inbri~ population concentration of 31.4%, Three of these block groups have a concentration of minori~ .res_!dpnts_ of oYe? 50%. T,h~ m~jodty o_f t,hese :b!pc~ g_rou_ps__h_aye ~h!gb~r H_i_sp~.nj~ Table 23: Iv]inon~ L;oncentratlon D~/~;ensus DIOCK ~rou ~ In 1 ~Percen~ ~:Per~nt: Census B ock~;~ To~l~ . ~:~Percent~ Percen[ ~Percen~ ~ * Grou~ ~M nor ~ H span C~ ~ B ac~ :~ indian~ Tract:: ~ ' ~ ' ' ~; ' ' ' ~ ~ ~ ~Oth~ 2i~00 ~ 96 92.0 2.~ '! ,O ~:9 20.01 7 89 0.0 81.0' ~:0 O.0 0~00 21.00 ~ 59 48.0 5.8 I ~ 4~0 0.~0 22.02 g 46 32.0 1 ! .~ 0.2 2-0 13.02 ~ 43 30.0 7.0 0.3 ~.q 2~ .~0 2 42 29.0 ~.~ 0~4 ~.~ 21.00 4 42 2!,0 16.0' 0.5 ~ 21.00 3 40 29.0 6.~ 0,8 ~.~ ~0.06 2 39 20.0 11.0 b ~. ~.~ 20.0i 4 3~ 30.0 3.0 0.3 5 ~ 20.01= 8 ~8 21.0 6 0 0.2 1 ~.0 Q.20 20.0i 3 36 20~0 ~,0 0.~ ~0.5 b.20 20.0i ! 35 15,0 9.o p.3 .!P.0 0.20 20,0i 2 ~2~ 19 0 6.0 0.4: ~.0 Source: Southem California Association of Govemments (SCAG) 1990 Census ~ It is believed that data reported for this Census B[oc~ Group was !q e~r[q~.r_an~J ~[in [aCt ~i~ are'a. ~ ~t h~e as high a minority concentration as was reported, 2 - Point at which percent of min0rity popu]afi on exceeri~-fl:~e ~3i{yw;id ~ {o{al mi~'{'y~ol~u~:U~r~ ~)~;i-.~ LOW[MODI~I:~ TEL!N _COMr~ Al~b MiNORi~ B'0ck ~roup~- tha{' ~-ad~ ~'high- c0n-cent_ra~i-°~ :.0:f igw and ~od_~_ei:.a{._e~.:i.n_~c9_ .me_ .a_~p' ~,a~'~ ~- h~ig"~ cqncentratig~n~o.f ming.n:bj hq_usehq d__s.. Table 24: Concentration of Low-income Source: U.S. Department of Housing ~nd Urban Deve!opmept (HUD), P_n~ ,S.o_ut,hem Ca!!fo~ia ~sqciaUon of ~V:p~T~p~, (SCA~). and 1990 Census This Block Group is not included in the City's Target area determinations because evidence indicates that data was incorrectly recorded for this area as if~ ~was vacant a.t ~e fimP of ~e Qep~us apd ~of!.sp qt i_n ~ct ha_v~ a ~cop~ce~n_tr a ~o~op.f !ejth ei' J ow_ -in corm e~ p~r minq[ity h0PApl~ol~s~ · PUBL!.C. HOds_iNG The Housing Authonty of the County of San Bemardlno was created and formally organ zed in July 194!, The Hou.s. ing Aut,hgdW i_s a poliUca! ent!.ty 0p.eratjng !pdepen. deq~y f_ro~ ~h~er gqve~mmen, ta! City of Rancho Cucamonga Communit~ Development Block Grant Program 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan ~ger~:i~s, Wl~)s~-~ima~y 0bj~tiV~ is t~ p~-Ovide a-ff(~rdA~ie h(~sing families within San Bemardino County. in Rancho Cucamonga the HoUsing Authodty's activitie~ involve a _S~ct_j_oB 8.H~qusin~g AS_S_is~nc~ P_ayme_n_t P[_ogra_._~ .a_.n.d ~ s_~_ca_~e__re~d___site__public housing ~he Hous~' A~tl~(~ Cu~tTy-0~p~t~s-i~-~a{~er~(~:Si~t~-, ~'b~liC housing uni~ in Ranch~ Cu~monga. These un ts inc ude 2 one;bedroom un ts, 4 ~o-bedmom Uni~ 3 throe.bedroom units, and 7 four-bedmom uni~; The 16public housing uni~ are s~ted to be in generally good condition but bemuse of the age of many of the units; lead based paint is a ~n~m. The Housing AuthoH~ states that ~ey intend to pumue an aggressive pmg~m to aba~ or manage all lead bas~ paint ha~rds that ~may exist; The Housing AuthoH~ does not anticipate the loss of any of these units in the foreseeable futura. Cu~ently them are no plans to combine effoAs or jointly fun~ activities that am covered by the Housing Authod~s Comprehensive Grant Program. This is primarily because of the fact that ~he ~!i~ Housing upi~ ~n ~he ~ ~m~Ee~ ~[~ ~gl~j~y unit~ and .n~[e~r~ ~m~l~: ~-he Sa"r~ B~;n~i'~0-~,(~unty Ho~sing Au{hority a~mih'iSters a-S'~-ct~o-n ~:e r:t~¢~,~e Pr-~gr~n~ ~T~h~-e are currently 170 Section 8 participants in the City. There are currently 112 Rancho Cucamonga residents on the Section 8 waiting list that should be assisted during the next five yeaj~s_~ Th~_se o~Q ~th_~ wa!ti~g list_mpY.be placed t_hr0ughout t~h~e rggi~n,~not nece. s_~sa..r!!y wit~h.!~_t~h ~e . .J~P~CAN~.I' _Q _UA~!F!qATIONC~ All of the applicants meet at least one of the federal preferences with the most common being that the family or indiVidual is PaYing more than 50% of their income toward rent or are housed in a substandard unit: The San Bernardino Coupty H0us!ngAuthqrity Qd-diti~.nal!y e~.e_~ p[e~f_e_r~q.Ce_S to yeterans _a~_d_ t° re~id_en_ts pf th~ Cou_n.~ ~-i~e ~)USin~-A~th'0ri{y has outlined ~e~;eral ~ystem-wi~le im'p'r'o~/ement~ ~-I~a{ management and operation of public housing units in Rancho Cucamonga, as well as throughout San Bernardino County, over the next five years. Utilizing improvement monies from the Comprehensive Grant Program, the Housing Authority is plap~ning improve~_ents jp ~h~.e. areas of o~.cup_ar)_cy, ~i~t~en~Qn~.c_e_, ~apa~ge__m_~n_t a_n_~ ~C~:o~un. tjng~ in 0~'~e~r [o 'ens~re~t~-{ pub~6 ~o~sing 'g0e~ '°nl~/-{~)' r~s'p0~sibl~'~n~--c~u-alifiea-~)~J~i'~ improvements in leasing procedures are planned. More thorough screening and resident selection mechanisms are being pursued, In addition, the Housing Authority is developing plans to more aggressively make the benefits of public housing known to groups traditionally under served by t~b~ progr, pm.~ Spe_ci_fica_l!y.!ow-ip_c,~_ .m.e~ fp~i!!e.s, st~de_n~ts, _and_ @a_ ~j'_cipa~n~_ ~ j~ ~aj~!pg p_rqgram_`a~ Yhe H0us~ng ~,uthod-~ ~-~i~(~ ~:-o-rn~i~ed to ~m~o~n~'t~-~int~n~nc~-~n~l ~po~'~em~ cuffently in place. Improved material ~ntmls, wo~ order and job tracking systems, as well as preventative maintenance programs and ongoing employee training, will result in beffer sewice ~ our residents and well.mainlined units. In the accoun~ng and prope~ managementamaS~ impmvemen~ am planned in th~. ~eas qf r~nt ~i9~, ~zj~g ~ q~Z~.~y~ent s~ ~ ~y~r. incre~ng ~0ma~ Page 33 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan !MPROV _N~ THE _[-_~_Nq-E_~v~O~_M_-E_N.T_~3.~ RES! .DE~ Because o}-th~) aide of ~a-ny o{ ~e-~nits, lead-I~a~ed p-~nJ'i~'a-c~cen~ ~nsa-~)ot~t~l ~n(~eF~ the Iow-~ncome families residing in public housing. The Housing Authoritywi pursue an aggressive progr_a_m_ to_ _e_d__q _ca. te r_e.~.de_nts__ aq_d abate or manageapY a~d a_ ~.d. _b. a_ _s e_ ~d p. ajqt h~a_~zQ...rd~ .t~at.__m~y exist. :l'h-e ~ou~in~ ~,u~*~)~ty ~)i~s ~ntinue to supp~Ft an~d ~'l~a~d~h~'~il~'~~Y-p~0'g~a~ under which participants receive financial incentives and support services as they become economically self sufficient. Additional means with which the Housing Authority will continue to improve the living environment of public housing residents include strategies to address health and safety isspe~_s an~ so_c!al s~e_ryi_c_e__suppoG, .e. co_no_rnic_ opportuniti_es_,_se~c~u_ri_ty~.a_p_d _cus. t0meF_s_e~!~c~-:' Finally:-a ~j~)r c(~mp0n~n-{-~( the~0~sin~-:A~h~r-ity's--fi~,eL~/~r~'pl~a-~ i-s a '~'e~o~}S o--n customer/resident services, Through improved management systems in maintenance and ongoing staff training, the Housing Authority plans to be a more effective and efficient agency. Improved se.rvices, pa_rt_cu _a_rlyin_ m__aiQten~)nce_ w cpptdbute__tp impr_oyi_n_g living_env!ro_n_m~ts ~fp~r res!.den_ts_. There ~re County of San Bernardino Department of Economic and Community Development Mortgage Revenue Bond Program, State Bond financing, City of Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopmen~ Agency, and HUD. A description of each of these units and the type of affoh:lability control is provided below. The level of assistance of these units is set to benoit Iow-i~cP~@._f. ami!ieq e~!r~g 80% o_r_!ess of_~he medi_an.i~co_n!e for San Be~a_~!qo/Riv~e~i.de_~. Table 25: Units Controls City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant program 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan Park~,lew P~ac6 Apts: :10930 Term Vista Pkwy g1730 ut,. Yjew Apts~ 10935Term ~sta Pkwy: 9173q 10400 Rte~ 91730 ~ycamore; Terrace ;10855 Terra ~sta pkwy,~' ~7~0 Evergreen Apta ~o7~0 Cl~ur~ 9'173~ ~OT,AL UNITs Westam Propedie~ ;11~6' N, Mountair~ Upland CA 91786 ,_w~estem Properties 1156 N~. Mountain_ ~Pl~nd Uncoln properties ~t675 MacArlhur Cti Newport Beach, C,~ 92660 Weste _m ~r0pertie~ ~ 156 N= Mquntai_n_' U~land;C~A 9~ 7~6 Western Properties ~1~§6 N. Mountail~ [Jpiand CA 91786 housing r~view bond houslh[~ review bond houstn~i review bond housin~ review_' bped~ housing ~eview bond iagmement ;10 yrs. reg~ Pg~ment I 0 ym; reg agreement ;10 ~. reg~ ~ Pgreeme~ ;10 yrs. reg~ agreement 9/95 7g 26 79 268 152 famii~ 270 famil~ ~g6 family 128 family 393 fami!~ ;1,33~ ~2'$t ,u, di0 ~'1 BR 80 2 BR 67 3 B~R 210_1 BR ,166 2 BR ~.8 1 BR eo 2 S~ ~63 2~ BR ~.985 ;198~ 1987~ £x~ellen~ Excel!eh{ Excellenf~ Excellen{ Page 35 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan ~TOT~ ~ ~pE ~ ~:~,:~DATE ~ ~ CONDmON~ W~dhaved W~dhaven Mano~ ~HF~ 40 ~] 2003 :11~ 117 ~mi!~ ~2 BR !98~ ~llen~ Manor ~; 5~57 WIIshire Bird; Revenue R~. 37 3 B~ 6230 Haveq · Suite 670 ~nds Agr~ment Ave..91701~ Los ~geles, CA 90036 Don'Miguei FredH~s Dev. Co~ 221 (D~ 40 ~. 20~ 40 200 family ~ 1 BR t 982 ~llent ~; Don Miguel Invest; [4) Reg~ ~106 2 BR 9850 1 ~ SE 18 B~k Hollow ~reement 91730 San~ ~a S2705 Rudolph Ca~ ~da ~soc S~ 15 ~ 2002 ~68 168 eldeH~ ~8 t BR ,198~ ~llen~ Henddckson S826 Fai~ve Dr~ housing Dev~ 90 2 BR 6628 ~e~t ~e~es, CA S0274 9173~ NOTE: THE FOLLOWING UN~S ~LL BE AT RISK IN 2005 OR ~TE~: : Hell.ge Pa~ Sheamo~Calma~ Sr: 20 ~ 2005 163 233 eldeHy 176 I BR 1985 ~llent ~ Hell.ge Pa~ Ltd: Housin~ Dev~ 57 2 BR 9601 Lomi~ ~675 Ma~ur Ct.~ ~e~ay Agr~ment Ct. 91730 ~350 New~ Beach, CA 92660 Ran~o Veep ScNDc RDA ~ar 20~ ~1~ 240 famil~ Ex~iient Village 10303 4th S~et, 20~ Res~io~ 8837 Grove ~ ~t~ Ave..91730 ~n~o Cu~monga ~ide 91730 Pep~d SCHDC RDA 30 ~r 2023 ~6 23~ ~mi;~ 50 Studi6 ~ ~0303 4ffi S~et~ 20% Resection ~128 1BR 9055 F~thi)i ~220 Set~ ~52 2 BR Blvd. 91730 Ran~o Cu~monga ~ide 91730 Page 36 City of Ranch~ Cucamonga Cornmuni~y Development Block Grant Program 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan · FACILITIES AND SERVICES FOR THE HOMELESS AND PERSONS THREATENED WITH HOMELESSNESS The following tables provide a summary of the facilities and services available to Rancho Cucamonga residents. While the majodty of the facilities discussed are not located within Rancho Cucamonga, they do assist City residents. Generally, all of the organizations contacted also provide services to those who are Iow- income and at dsk of becoming homeless. While several organizations provide direct utility assistance, other services provided food distribution and assisting to families by allowing them to 'direct their available capital into rent and utilities rather than food. inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board assists those at risk of homelessness by providing fair housing counseling and landlord/tenant mediation services. Other services generally available include referral, advocacy, counseling, education, training, and job counseling. Ta61e 2i~: ~ Ho-meleSsi~ac~l~ities and o,' anizations Provi~linq ~ervi~S 6r-~,ssisian-c,e Food and Meals~ 8 4 ~t0rage Of perso~ai beiong!ng~ 2 1 Show~r_ and ~ve fa~ilities~ 2 4 Other personal groon~ing serVice~ 2 2 Laundry 1 C!~o~hipg Mail "drOP,, (S te Used as maiii_qg a~¢dress) 3 1 Job Counseling Eduction and-~raip]r~ L~fe skdls (budgeting planning q0ok!ng, etc.) ~ 1 Legal COunseling ~ 6 Child ~am Early Childhood EdUction ~ransp0rtation Utiii~/Assi~tarice 3 4 Med Ca/menta Scre~ning!refe~ra! Chem ca dependency screeningJreferral 'i 6 SSI/ssDI AP~iicati~n Assi~ta~ Apartrqent/Emergedcy s~elter referral ~i .! On Slte Treatmen~ Drug ~U~ Alcohol ~use Mental Health proble~m, S Domestic Violence Counseling 1 Sob~; p!a~ni~g piyis!g~ S_urvey Augdst !99;~ Page 37 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan Table 27 ~ransitlonal i~P~l~ma~tt ~ Catholic Charities X X X X Foothill Family Shelter X X X X X Habitat for Humanity X He Cares X X X X House of Ruth X X X X X X X Inland Valley Council of X X X X X X X X Chumhes Project Sister X X X Salvation Army X X X S,B. County Homeless X X Mentally Ill Program Page 38 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan · SUPPORTIVE HOUSING FOR NON-HOMELESS PERSONS WITH SPECIAL NEEDS Numerous state, county, and local organizations were contacted to obtain information on services and facilities for special needs populations. The majodty of organizations and facilities that are discussed below are not located within Rancho Cucamonga. The service areas of these groups are often faidy extensive and encompass at least the West End regional area if not even broader service areas. While obtaining information on types of services and facilities, agencies were also queried on their efforts to coordinate services with other agencies. In addition to working with other federal, state, county, and local jurisdictions, many agencies themselves are intemonnected and rely upon one anotherto provide comprehensive client assistance. Many participate in the Rancho Cucamonga Community Services Network that was established to coordinate resources, network services, and promote teamwork in addressing recreational and social needs of residents in the City. No single agency has the capacity to provide complete and comprehensive services and the majority of facilities in the West End regional area is aware of and share assistance and information with one another. ELDERLY AND FRAIL ELDERLY For purposes of this document, the term eldedy will be defined as any person over 62 years of age. The definition for frail eldedy will be defined as any person over 75 years of age or over 62 years of age and in need of assistance to perform routine activities of daily living such as bathing and eating. A discussion of the services provided to these two groups has been combined as only one of the organizations contacted had a specific program set up to primarily assist the frail elderly. Another problem in evaluation the services was that there is no standard definition used by these agencies. The definition for elderly varied from 55 to 65 years of age. and no standard definition for frail eldedy was used. DI$~.BI~ED Both the State Of California's Dep~rtment Of Rehabiii~fion ~na-th~e ~'s{'End-~p-ecia~ EduCation programs provide assistance to individuals with ail types of disabilities; physical, mental, or developmental. The California Department of Rehabilitation assists individuals by_ providing intensive job training and job placement services. The West End Special Education_ Program provides educational services only for persons b_e~ee~ the _ag~e_s.. pf 3 .a~n_d_ ~2~.. S_ e.ry!ce__S are pro~V!ded through, y_arious s~cho, o_ distdc_~ in th~ Lantemm-anb~velopmental services provideS a r'esi~entiai care f~(;,ih~'~ {0{ developmentally disabled persons. They provide medical attention, self-care assistance-a_Q~ train'ing. Many of their patients will never be a_b_l.e tp I!ve iqd_e_pe_p.~d ~eq~ I__ive~s s9 _fqr s_pm_~_e L. ant~e _m.m_a__n._b._e_ _c~e_s._thp!r pe~.aPen_t !!o~e_.~ The ~)rne~es~ Uentail~, IIl~isrogram (HMIP) pr0vide~ ~hel{er, ~ou~e)ir~g-m~d~ai {rea{ment, and medication for homeless people that are seriously and persistently mentally ill. They provide 60 beds in a group home environment; HMIP also works with the Salvation Army to provide additional shelter when necessary. HMIP also runs a case management program for.._~ persons Who are retuming to the community from a mental institution. The program ens ,u_r_e~ [hat. their clients are placed in a stable living' situation in order to prevent them from becoming home ess aga n Th.e~y _als_9 _w.o~_w ~ the S.~tate.Pe_p~_m~e_n_t 0_f Rehabilita._tjgr).~to~he_lp- th_e!~ &iier~ fi_n~ Page 3~ City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Developmen! Block Grant Program 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan Th-e~§{-a~e ~p~rtr~n{ o{ Social '~er~-i~:es'(J~cumen~s'g'r~l~ h~r~es ~-~:~e-~lisab-~d in__ Ran~:ho Cucamonga based on State Licensing. Each home on the state's list has an indicated preference for the type of disabled person (developmentally, physically, or mentally) to be s~e_'~ and age range. There are 4 small family homes serving children from 0-17, 4 group home_~ serving youth from 6-17, and 9 adult residential homes, serving developmentally disabled. individuals between the ages of 18 and 59. Small family homes, group homes, and adult_ -, residential homes are able to serve up to six individuals, while the two day care facilities maY_ serve up to 3~0_ [ndiv!dqa!_s_. _A lisUn+g o.f the .s_~te-l!cen_sgd ~'~eside.n. ti_a! ~re faci[it_i,e~ is prgy]ded~ in. ~ppe_nd_ix C_. PERSONS WITH ALCOHOL OR OTHER DRUG ADDICTIONS The County of San Bemardino Department of Behavioral Health, Alcohol and Drag Services (ADS) provides a full range of alcohol and drug services for its communities and residents. Prevention, outpatient, and residential programs are offered in every significant population center in the County through contracts with community-based organizations. Individual, group and family counseling are offered on an outpatient basis. ADS provides services including alcohol detoxification, treatment for chemical dependency, homeless programs, counseling for adolescents, networking between programs, and education to employees and professionals about signs and symptoms of abuse and available services. PERSONS DIAGNOSED WITH AIDS OR RELATED DISEASES There are two facilities available in the West End service area that assists persons with AIDS or Symptomatic HIV Disease, the Inland AIDS Project and the Foothill AIDS Project. The Foothill AIDS Project's mission is to enhance the quality of life for persons living with HIV/AIDS through comprehensive support services, and to reduce HI¥ infection through collaborative prevention education. The Inland AIDS Project's (lAP) mission is to provide "health care, support services and advocacy for persons affected by HIV in the Inland Regions of Southern California." lAP accomplishes this through the provision of a comprehensive set of services such as case management, mental health counseling, substance abuse counseling, food distribution, legal services, home health care, residential care services for the chronically ill, transitional housing as well as Iow income housing rental, and transportation to medical and social services appointments. Additionally, they agency has a strong prevention and educational focus increasing community awareness and involvement in this important health issue. · BARRIERS AND OPPORTUNITIES TO HOUSING DEVELOPMENT NON.GOVERNMENTAL CONSTRAINTS LAND PRICE AND CONSTRUCTION COSTS The pdce of land impacts the pdce of new homes and also residential resale pdce. The land speculation that occurred dudng the second half of the 1980's resulted in a significant inflationary trend on all home pdces. The result was reduced housing affordability at all income levels. Along with the resurgence of the regional economy the dramatic growth in home sales has been accompanied by a surge to record high property values. The increase in property values corresponds directly to increases in the cost of obtaining new housing. Page 40 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 200.%2009 Consolidated Plan The two biggest expenses in housing development are land costs and fees. Construction costs tend to correlate with the CPI, and thus remain somewhat consistent. So while construction costs have increased along with the CPI, the cost of land has escalated to the largest item associated with the cost of housing. Dudng the 1980's land speculation was heated and peaked in 1989. Speculation led to many foreclosures in the City's Sphere of Influence as well as to foreclosures in the City. For example, land in the City with an approved tentative tract map that sold dudng the 1980's for $100,000 an acre, resold after foreclosure for $20,000 an acre in 1994. In the early 1990's the price of land declined dramatically. The raw land price has increased substantially since 1994 as a result of the economic resurgence from the 1990's recession. With the resurging economy, land prices slowly rose to the pre-speculation levels. According to local developers, raw land costs in the City and surrounding region have increased 100% since the mid 1990's. Thus it can be seen that land speculation acts as a non-governmental constraint on housing. Among many effects, one is that deal-making may became the focus of development rather than housing production. Construction cost depends on the price of materials, quality of construction, and finish detail. Construction costs have more or less paralleled the CPI from 1989 to the present. In general, the CPI has increased an average of 2.38% from 1995 through 1999, with a high of 3.0% in 1996 and a Iow of 1.6% in 1998. This compares with an average annual increase of 5.9% per year for the CPI from 1979 to 1989. The cost of construction is dependent on the cost of labor and materials. The importance of each is a function of the complex nature of the construction industry and the nature of the finished product. The trend over the last few decades has been toward improving efficiency in housing production, largely because the construction of housing usually occurs through an open bidding process where the most reasonable contractor's bid is awarded the job. As a result, builders are under constant pressure to complete a job for as Iow a pdce as possible while providing a quality product. This pressure has led to an emphasis on laborsaving materials and new construction techniques. For the average home, the cost of labor is generally two to three times the cost of materials, and therefore, represents an important component of the construction process. Construction costs are assumed to have kept pace with the Consumer Pdce Index (CPI). The cost of land is another significant component to the production of affordable housing. Land costs are influenced by many variables, including the scarcity of land, developable density, the availability of public utilities (e.g., sewer, water, electricity, gas, etc.), and the level of public improvements (e.g., street improvements). Although land is available in the City, the cost of land will ultimately depend on regional demands. The current pattern of people working in adjacent counties and living in the Inland Empire, due to the lower cost of housing, is expected to continue. This will ultimately be reflected in higher local land costs. The current and projected increases in population for the City should serve to stimulate residential development for which there is currently adequate land available. There is a tremendous opportunity to develop affordable housing units for first-time home buyers and given the proper incentives, local first-time home buyer programs (NHDC and RDA) will provide new units for Iow-income home buyers. Page 41 ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan FINANCING There are two types of financing available for housing: both construction financing and homebuyer financing. Because of its short-term nature, a construction loan is borrowed at a relatively high commercial interest rate. The limited duration of the loan also means that fluctuations in the cost of a construction loan have a relatively minor impact on the affordability of a residential project. Long term financing for the homebuyer use to purchase either an owner occupied residence. Small shifts in the interest rate can have a dramatic effect on the ability of households to purchase a home, given that prospective homebuyers must meet income and credit qualifications that determine the size of the loan, and ultimately the amount of the monthly mortgage payment. A broad control of interest rates is not within the abilities of local government control. Governmental Constraints An analysis of government regulations and policies in the City indicate that regulations in force are necessary for the public health, safety, and welfare of the community and are not an undue constraint on development. The City's zoning and development standards encourage a wide range of housing types, including single and multi-family, rental and ownership, and mobile homes. BUILDING CODES AND ENFORCEMENT The City of Rancho Cucamonga has adopted, by reference, the State Uniform Building, Mechanical, Plumbing, Housing, Uniform Sign, and Abatement for Dangerous Buildings Codes. These codes are considered the minimum necessary to protect the public's health, safety, and welfare. In addition to the standard code enforcement practices, the City encourages the preservation of histodc structures through application of the Histodc Building Code (2001 California Historical Building Code, Title 24, Part 8), which permits the use of odginal or archaic materials in reconstruction. The City's h.ous!_n.g ~tock i~.gen~eral!y in good condition with few buildings needing repair because only .13.4°_,~ were_ built before. 197_0. For those structures that do need repair, the City enforces those standards and regulations that ensure reasonable and adequate life safety. The application of these standards allows for the exercise of judgment, as permitted in the code, so as to not unduly penalize older dwellings that were built under less demanding standards. FEES City fee schedules are reviewed and adopted annually, and the methodologies to support these fees are reviewed periodically. Fees ensure that new development will have adequate infrastructure and public services and therefore, are a prerequisite to development. Mello-Roos financing through the formation of Community Facilities Districts provides an alternative means to finance a portion of new infrastructure. Their use raises concerns about perceived property tax burden and equity. Where bonds have been issued for required infrastructure, such as flood protection facilities, the burden of bond debt has increased to new homeowners and vacant land property owners in proportion to the reduction in anticipated new home 'construction. City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC PLAN · PRIORITY ANALYSIS AND STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT The process involved in setting priorities and determining the appropriate strategies and programs to address identified priorities was based upon the following goal. To develop viable urban communities by providing decent housing and a suitable living environment and expanding economic opportunities principally for persons of Iow- and moderate-income. Priorities were based on identified community needs and available resources. The following discussion provides a basis for assigning a relative pdofity to each pdodty need and identifies specific objectives, accomplishments, obstacles, and geographic distribution for each priority. Areas of need are assigned one of four priodty designations: High (H), Medium (M), Low (L), and No Such Need (N), defined as follows: High Priority Medium Priority Activities to address this need will be funded by the City dudng the coming five-year pedod. If funds are available, activities to address this need may be funded during the coming five-year period. Low Priority The City will not fund activities to address this need dudng the five-year period. The City will consider certifications of consistency. No Such Need Either there is no need or the City shows that this need is already substantially addressed. No certifications of consistency considered. · HOUS NG AFFORDABILITY High_ pr~io_.rLty .H. 1 Extremely Iow-, Iow,, and moderate,~ncome renters and owners, in all family categories, experienc nq cost burden .qreater than 30 % of gross income and extremely Iow and Iow income renters and owners expedencinq severe cost burden greater than 50%~ ~h-e i 9~l~ C~-n~lJs'd-~a i~(~ica~-s thatT~lJ-eJ~e'm-~J~7 ~:; k~gv-, 'a~id- r~)~m{~:ihc~3m~ owners havea tremendous housing assistance need. A large majodty of all renter, 78%, and owner. 64%, households with incomes below 80% of the median experience cost burden (see Table, 6). Significant proportions of all households with incomes below 50% of the m~ian ex@erien~..a_ .sev~re_.~_st ~b_urd_en, ~0~.~ qf_.gW_.p_er hguse_~h9!cl_~ an~d ~78_~A.of__r_e_nt_e__r_ h-°gse__hol__d_si A majo~ of ~l~l~v~-ar{~l n~0~le?a{~e:inc~)n~ ~o~u~h(~l~ ~p~-r~ence~-t~-~f~0-u~g-i~r-~blem (79% Extremely Low, 84% Low, and 73% Low-Moderate). In this category HUD has included three factors: 1) occupy a unit that has physical defect (lacking a complete kitchen or p.l. gm_~b[ng);_~) are over_c~rg, wded;.a_n_d 3) haye a _hg.u.s. i_n_g CoSt .b~rd~-n o__r_.s~y_ere_h_o_us_i_nng~t_ b~urd_e_n~ unmet need of 1,203 available units for extremely Iow-income households and 1,163 Units needed, ~fq_r. !_ow-!nc. pm_~., h_o__us._eho~_d_s (s_e_~_Tabl__e__ 2_2).. _ M_._a._n_y I@?i_n_go__me_hgusebol_..d.s must_o__v~Eextend Page 43 ~ ~&~ City of Rancho Cucarnonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan ~hemselves 'or do~bl~ up in overcrowded sit[~fions {o ob{~in i~°~sing. Re~°~rc~s are-cu~ntiy available to provide assistance to this needs group, including public housing and Section 8 as well as the Redevelopment Agency's 20 Perceo~ Se,t As .de fuq.d.s. ~i_t_h t_h__e acquis~_tio_._n_ ex[sting re~[ uqit_s_a.nd .n.e..w _cg._0s.t~ctipp_. H2 Lar.qe related renter fam~hes in overcrowded s~tuatlons w~th ~ncomes below 80% of the median family income. The in(~ider~ce-0~ ove~c~-~wding for large renter {a~iiie~'is significan{iy Mg~er, 36J;~%, ~,'n'~-(~i: a~i other renter households, 10.1% (see Table 7). Extremely Iow- and Iow-income large renter families are significantly disproportionately represented with 77.1% of all large, extremely Iow-income, renter families and 60% of all Iow-income renter families in overcrowded situatiops~ Eve_n_ ~oderate~ income arge ren~er lam es are over-represented_ wt.h 3~.6% ove~mrowded. Housing market co-ns{mints o~affordability and ~Jv-a~lat~iii~y pia~,-a signific~nt~r~l~ ~h'the-i~ro-biem: AS discussed in H1 above, there is an unmet need of 2,371 units available for extremely Iow and Iow- income families. Compounding this problem is the lack of available large units for renter households (see Table 16). These is an unmet need for approximately 1,298 large (three or more bedrooms) renter units. Resources, through the Redevelopment Agency 20 Per.ce~t ~set_~-Asi~e p_r0gmm, ~are_ o.bliga_ted for us~ in dev.elqp!ng a~dd_itiqnal large _fa_mily mn~e_r hgus!qg.~ H3 Owner hebse~o~-ds With 'incOmes below 8b% ~(~ t~he median Wi{h SU6S{~ard h0{J~inR. W~ile th~i-n~:~den~e °W ho-useh"(~ids wi~h s0n~ ~ype of housin~ i~mBem is ~r{y hi-gh~3-§~¥~)r ~ii owner households, those in the Iow- and moderate-income categories are significantly over- represented.' Based on 'income, 71.7% extremely Iow-income, 76.2% Iow-income and moderate-i0c0me owner 0cc_uPied .hpusehgld's ~xpede~c~ sgme _type _o.~ h~o..u..s_in_g, p.ro~Je_...m~ Them am-'appr-oximately '~,416 owner units available to Iow- and moderate-income owner households. Of these units, it is estimated that 69.7% are substandard (see Table 19); and 83% are suitable for rehabilitation. This indicates that a significant proportion of the existing available affordable owner-occupied housing stock is in need of rehabilitation. In evidence of this need the · Home Improvement Program single-family, owner-occupied reha~ili.ta..tio~ program ha~s 46 ~ing!~ family homes ~qd ~33 mq~i!_e home~s op .the w~i[ing !i~t. The existin~ stocl~ ~)f housing a~aiiable to iow and n-{0derat'e-i~c~me-~)t~e~0~S ~-~reser~s- ar~. important soume of affordable housing in the communi~. It is impo~nt to main~in i~ condition in order to continue its availabili~ as well as to protect the welfare of those in need of Iow ~st housing; There am resources cuffently available to assist in ~is ama, which pdmadly include the Ci~s CDBG program. Additional resggr~es may co~ avai!ab~ through th~ C~ pa~p~ ~n~ [h~ Cgqn~ HOME.~o~o~iu~ Med~urn Priority M;I - '- Ren{er"h~)useh01ds in sub~{andard conditi~)-ns A majority ~fali re~er h0~s~h'0'id-s-expe~ier~e ~)n~e t0~ 0{'t:~0U~i~ ~Fo-bi~:-'T-he housing is comparatively new with the majority constructed between 1980 and 1990. There are far more units available to Iow- and moderate-income renter households than owner (3,054 units) (see Table 21). In evaluating the incidence of substandard factors, approximately 30%, or 1,063 Iow- and .m. ode.rate-inco__.m._e ~r.eq~! ~Uni_ts, @~re sg b.s~t~n~_a._rd.. ~f t~hes~e u_.~i~, ~i.t i~ e_stima~.ed~ t_ha.t 8_8.2_ a_re Page 44 City of Rancho Cucarnonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan for ~ha~)ili{ati(~ (s~e T~bl~l 9); ] Res_qu m~s_ W!I! ~e_availa~ble {h~oug~ ~e ~i~ ~icip~t[q~ iD]i]h~ Cog~ HOME C~q~g~i~ ~ ' Renie~ a'n~ ~wh~ ~0u~i~s W~th mo~e~aie-~ome~xpeH~n'~i~a'~e'~ burden] T~ perce~'-~f-'~o~m~:income ~seh~ds ~-fi~'~i~'~er~-~ ~E~ ~ comparison with other lower income households. A to~l of 19% of all moderate-in.me mntem an~ 25% of all moderate-income ownem expedenca severn cost burden. The majod~ of families in this income catego~ are able to secure housing without experiencing severn debt. Many househo ds in this income catego~ have access to housing that is also available to e~mmely Iow- and Iow-in.me families. There is adequate housing to meet the demand of moderate-income households, plus ~e availabili~ of lower-cost housing (see Table 22). The emphasis on increasing availabili~ of housing to alleviate severn cost burden is less of a need for this income group. Resour~s may be used in conjunction with provisions for affordable housing for o~er income groups in projec~ where a mix of income categod~ is p~ovided. Fundipg may inc!~e ~e~eyelop~en~ Ag~p~s ~q ~e~ ~t~ Aside pmgmm~ M3 O~ner hou~eh~ith (ncome~- bel0~ 8O%0f~he ~e~i~n' i~-~erc~w~d ~diti~hs. Overc~'ow~ling-f(~r OWr~er-o-c~U pied~ ~dUseholds ~ppea-rS tO-be less ~)f a p--r~bl'¥~ {h-a-~ {o~ r~nt-ers~-,~ total of 3.4% of owner-occupied households, other than e dedY, 9x. peri~c_e~o, vgr.crowd!qg: T~ !ncid~ence of pve_rcrp_wdiog is actually I.ess fo[ lower incomes, Ther~ is ~ si-gni~can{ ~[JPl~y ofl-a~ge, {hm-e or ~o~e'l~edroornS; Own(~r---oCd~l~]ed~l~-u~ih~-(~ ¥~b~& 16), and a surplus of available housing for moderate-income households (see Table 22). While no! a significa~nt pr.ob!e~m i.n.d_i¥i~_u _a_l _ca_~e ~situa_tion_s may_b_e addr__es.s_ed_t_h.r_ough~ t_h..e_ H_o.~e !Dp_r_ov_e_.me_nt ?rogram, L1 Sm&Ii rela{-ed' r~'r~{~r'h6d~h-ol~ls in Ove-r~:Ow~J~cl- C6hdi~o~s {O~-~O~-~l); THere 'is Jit~le d~{a'that ~'~icates'-o~,ercrowding is~a 'prOblem Census data indicates that large ranter households have signifl~nt need (see Table 7). A review of housing availabili~ does not indicate a lack of housing for these families (see Table 16). Small households may e~perience ovemrowding in situations where families double-up to save on housing costs; however, documen~tion of this occu~ing is pot ayai[ab!e:, wi!! be a~locate~ ~o add.m~_~hi~ ~p~c!~c ~i~a~, No Such Need N1 Eldedy renter households in overcrowded conditions. Elderly households are generally smaller in size and either retain possession and live in an old family home or have found smaller residences after retirement. As a result, there is no data that indicates that elderly households live in overcrowded conditions. No resources will be allocated to address this specific situation. Objectives Based on analysis of community needs, existing market conditions, available resources, Page 45 City of Rancho Cucarnonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan and the priority designation, affordable housing issues can be grouped into three general categories: availability, affordability, and preservation. AVAILABILITY There is currently a lack of quality available housing for households in the lower income categories particularly with regards to large rental units. Of the stock that is available, much of the owner-occupied housing is in need of rehabilitation. Objectives 1 and 2 of the Affordable Housing Strategic Plan address this pdodty. AFFORDABILITY Housing cost burden can often represent the largest debt that a household will have. As cost burden rises, families and individuals may have to do without other essentials that may jeopardize their health, safety, or welfare. It is important that Iow cost housing is available so that Iow- and moderate-income families can find adequate and decent housing. Objectives 3 and 4 of the Affordable Housing Strategic Plan address this pdodty. PRESERVATION Preservation of existing housing stock an economical means of continuing or increasing the affordable housing stock. While the housing stock is relatively new, some areas of the City contain concentrations of housing built pdor to 1940. The areas with a concentration of older housing also tend to have a higher concentration of lower-income households. With the lack of available funds, significant repairs may be put off resulting in deterioration as well as development of potential health and safety hazards, .including_ increase~d ex_ po_sucre t~o__le~_d:'_ba~ed paint. Census inforrn~tion'indicates that approximately 69.7% of all owner-occupied h~_u ~s!~g and 30% of al! re~te? h0qsing available _t~o !ow- apd moderate-incqme Subs~t~nda~. Objectives 5 and 6 of the Affordable Housing Strategic Plan address this priority. Obstacles to Meeting Under-Served Needs The primary obstacle to meeting under-served needs is the lack of available resources to provide affordable housing. To provide for those in the lowest income categories, tremendous subsidies are required. As a result, housing in this category may be constructed with direct government assistance, such as in the case with the use of the Redevelopment Agency's 20 Percent Set Aside funds. Through cooperation with non-profit housing agencies, the Northtown Housing Development Corporation (NHDC) and the Southern California Housing Development Corporation (SCHDC), they are able to work directly with the City in providing affordable housing. · HOUSING AFFORDABILITY STRATEGIC PLAN OBJECTIVE '1: CONSERVATION OF EXISTING SINGLE-FAMILY AND MULTIPLE- FAMILY AFFORDABLE HOUSING STOCK. Program 1.t: Acquisition of existing multiple-family units to be held for future affordable housing stock. There are a significant number of affordable rental units that were originally funded using federal, state, or local incentives. The RDA's intention is to acquire existing unrestricted units City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan and add income restrictions to all or a portion of the units. The RDA has entered into public/private partnerships with the NHDC and SCHDC to purchase and restrict units as affordable for at least a 30-year period. Resources: RDA 20 Percent Set-Aside and Public Housing Authority acquisition and rehabilitation. Geographic Location: Activities will primarily occur within the Redevelopment target area, however, units may be acquired citywide. Accomplishments: Through June 30, 2010, acquire and conserve the following multiple family units. · Acquisition of 250 nOn-restricted units of which 125 w be held for incomes below 50% of the area med aq .an_d ! 25_ Will b_e h~l ~d.f~or. h_.o. us.e~h_gl_ds_ yvJt_h in~__c.o_m~e~_s _bp!_o~ ~80~ o-f t_h~e area median; · . _Conservation~(:~f~;l:~,~es-~t~d-units'~)f-~v~ ~w~l'~§~l~eJd~ k~:~u'seh~s with inco~ below 50% of the ~ia.~ ~nd _6~7 wil! b~ _he!d_fo_r_ _h0._u ~se~g!d_ s wit_h. !n~m~s~.b~e!9~P_°~ ~t h~e~ _a_~'e_a_ ~edianz Program 1.2: Acquisition and rehabilitation of existing single family homes. The RDA undertook a program in the Northtown target neighborhood where the NHDC acquires the home, rehabilitated them, and then sells or rents the home to Iow-income households. Resources: Redevelopment Agency 20 Percent Set-Aside funds with subsidies from the Affordable Housing Program. Geographic Location: The Northtown target neighborhood. Accomplishments: Through June 30, 2010, acquire and/or rehabilitate eight single-family units. This will include four units held for households with incomes below 50% of the area median income and four units held for households with incomes below 80% of the area median income. OBJECTIVE 2: IMPROVE ACCESS TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOR ALL LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS, WITH EMPHASIS ON PRODUCTION OF LARGER (3+ BEDROOM) RENTAL UNITS. Program 2.1: Construction of affordable multi-family units. To increase the availability of affordable rental stock, the RDA, in conjunction with local non- profit development agencies, will pursue new construction of affordable units in its existing target areas. Emphasis has been placed on construction of units available to large families. Resources: HOME funds, Redevelopment Agency 20 Percent Set-Aside funds, Low-Income Tax Credits, and Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA). Geographic Location: The Redevelopment Agency project area. Accomplishments: Through June 30, 2010, construct ~ new multi-family units. This will include 50 held for households with incomes below 50% of the area median and 50 held for households below 80% of the area median. Page 47 ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan Program 2.2: Construction of single-family infill development in Iow- and moderate-income neighborhoods. The NHDC constructs new homes on infill lots within the Northtown target neighborhood. When lots ara available, new homes ara made available to families with incomes between 80% and 90% of the area median income. The NHDC is the owner/developer of the infill lots; however, these lots ara pumhased with assistance from the Redevelopment Agency. Resources: Redevelopment Agency 20 Percent Set-Aside funds. Geographic Location: This activity has occurred in the Northtown neighborhood; however, the Redevelopment Agency may operate similar programs in other target neighborhoods. Accomplishments: Through June 30, 2010, the development of 15 new single-family units. Of these, eight units will be held for households with incomes below 50% of the araa median and seven will be held for households with incomes below 80% of the area median. OBJECTIVE 3: PROVIDE DIRECT RENTER ASSISTANCE TO LOW- AND MODERATE- INCOME HOUSEHOLDS IN ORDER TO OBTAIN OR RETAIN PERMANENT HOUSING. Program 3.1: Support applications by the Housing Authority of San Bernardino County for Section 8 and public housing assistance. The Housing Authority routinely raquests assistance when applying for federal funds under Section 8 Housing Certificates and Vouchers for public housing assistance. The City will continue to support these applications. The agency currantly operates 6,257 Section 8 units of which 170 are located within the City. The agency also operates 16 public housing units and rents them to qualified households at affordable rates. Resources: County of San Bernardino, Housing Authority. Geographic Location: Housing Certificates and Vouchers may be utilized citywide. Accomplishments: Through June 30, 2010, annually support 170 Section 8 units and 16 public housing units.. Program 3.2: Participate in the HOME Consortium Tenant-Based Rental Assistance (TBRA) program. The Tenant-Based Rental Assistance ("TBRA") program is offerad through the HOME Consortium and is available to eligible residents. The program provides both a monthly rent subsidy for very iow-income special needs households and security deposit assistance to households receiving a monthly rental subsidy from the San Bemardino County Housing Authority. The County targets monthly rental assistance to eligible households that include a disabled family member, and they place a priority on providing security deposit assistance to families experiencing "temporary" housing situations where the temporary housing or shelter is either not suitable or not available as permanent housing. Lead Agency: County of San Bemardino, ECD, HOME Consortium. Page 48 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan Geographic Location: Available to eligible residents citywide. Resources: HOME funds are available on a first-come first-serve basis through the City's participation in the County HOME Consortium. Accomplishments: Through June 30, 2010, assist 30 households. OBJECTIVE 4: INCREASE HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES FOR LOW-AND MODERATE- INCOME HOME OWNERSHIP, PARTICULARLY THROUGH FIRST- TIME HOMEBUYER ASSISTANCE. Program 4.'1: Administer a City sponsored Home Buyer Program. The RDA administers a Home Buyer program usin do~ayment assistance loans. The loan is 10% of the purchase price up to a maximum of ~hich is forgiven if the buyer remains in the unit for 45 years. Geographic Location: This program is available to eligible residents citywide. Resources: RDA Set-Aside funds with approximately ~ budgeted per year. Accomplishments: Through June 30, 2010, assist 50 homebuyers. Program 4.2: Participate in the HOME Consortium Homeownership Assistance Program (HAP). The HAP assists households earning less than 80% of the median family income in the pumhase of a home. The HAP is a silent second trust deed program to assist Iow-income persons in becoming homeowners. Lead Agency: County of San Bernardino, ECD, HOME Consortium. Geographic Location: This program is available to eligible residents citywide. Resources: HOME funds are available on a first-come first-serve basis through the City's participation in the County HOME Consortium. Accomplishments and Time Frame: Through June 30, 2010, assist 20 households. Program 4.3: Assist the NHDC First-Time Home Buyer Program. The NHDC's First Time Home Buyer Program provides newly constructed and/or rehabilitated single-family homes to Iow- and moderate-income homebuyers in the Northtown neighborhood. NHDC plans to complete the construction of new homes (see Affordable Housing, Objective 2, Program 2.2), as well as the rehabilitated existing homes (see Affordable Housing, Objective 1, Program 1.2) to provide the homes available for this program. The newly constructed homes are typically sold to income-eligible homebuyers eaming up to 90% of the area median family income. The rehabilitated homes are leased for a two-year period at affordable rents to families earning between 45% and 60% of the area median family income. At the end of the two year lease period, the tenant will be offered a purchase option if they have demonstrated the ability to age49 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan properly maintain and pay for the home and can arrange financing for an affordable first mortgage. Geographic Location: The Northtown target neighborhood. Resources: The NHDC received a pledge amount from the Redevelopment Agency that they are able to use accordingly to meet the goals of their affordable housing program. Accomplishments and Time Frame: Through June 30, 2010, the sale or lease of 23 newly constructed or rehabilitated homes. OBJECTIVE 5: REHABILITATION OF THE EXISTING HOUSING STOCK WITH EMPHASIS ON OWNER-OCCUPIED HOUSING. Program 5.'1: Provide moderate rehabilitation of owner occupied, single-family and mobile homes for extremely Iow-, Iow-, and moderate-income homeowners. The City has an existing moderate rehabilitation Home Improvement Program available to eligible owner-occupied households, those earning less than 80% of the area median family income. The program offers deferred payment loans of up to $30,000 and grants of up to $7,500, including emergency repair grants. The City runs this as a full service program and lends the money, secures contractors, oversees the work, and maintains administration of the grants and loans rather than farming this work out to the bank or homeowner. Resources: CDBG funds. Geographic Distribution: This program is available Citywide and is based on the eligibility of the applicant. Accomplishments: Through June 30, 2010, assist 200 households with incomes below 80% of the area median family income. Program 5.2: Participate in the HOME Consortium.Rental Property Acquisition and Rehabilitation Program. This program provides a three (3) percent interest loan to acquire and/or rehabilitate existing rental properly that will then be made available to qualifying tenants at affordable rents for a specified period. Funds may be used for moderate rehabilitation efforts, with a maximum allowed of up to $ 25,000 per unit. The HOME assisted units will be subject to specific rent limits, and be available to Iow- and very-low income residents. This program also provides funding for the refinancing and rehabilitation of multi-family units. Lead Agency: County of San Bemardino, ECD, HOME Consortium. Geographic Location: This program is available to eligible residents citywide. Resources: HOME funds are available on a first-come first-serve basis through the City's participation in the County HOME Consortium. Accomplishments and Time Frame: Through June 30, 2010, assist five units. Page SO CiO/of Rancho Cucarnonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan Program 5.3: Participate in the HOME Consortium Multifamily Rental Property Rehabilitation/Refinance Program. Provides throe (3) pement interost loans to nonprofit and for-profit owners of affordable multifamily rontal housing (five (5) or more units) primarily for the rehabilitation of their residential rontal property, which will then be made available to qualifying tenants at affordable rents for a specific period. Lead Agency: County of San Bernardino, ECD, HOME Consortium. Geographic Location: This program is available to eligible rosidents citywide. Resources: HOME funds are available on a first-come first-serve basis through the City's participation in the County HOME Consortium. Accomplishments and Time Frame: Through June 30, 2010, assist five units. OBJECTIVE 6: IMPROVE LIVING CONDITIONS FOR LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS. Program 6.1: Support applications of the Housing Authority for'their annual Comprehensive Grant to improve living conditions for public housing residents. 'Each year the City has certified consistency of the Housing Authodty's Comprehensive Grant Program. Resources: HUD Comprehensive Grant funds. Geographic Location: The Housing Authority's public housing units are scattered throughout the City. Accomplishments: Through June 30, 2010, maintain assistance to 16 public housing units. · HOMELESS High Priority H1 Assessment, outreach, and emer.qency shelter for families, individuals, and persons with special needs. Assessment and outreach are the first lines of defense toward evaluating and providing assistance to those who are homeless or near homeless. Emergency shelters provide the basis for development of a comprehensive homeless assistance program. Providing immediate assistance and advocacy in the eady stages of homelessness or near homelessness will help individuals, families, and persons with special needs obtain and/or retain permanent housing. Resources are currently allocated toward support of existing assessment and outreach facilities and emergency shelter assistance. It is likely that funding will continue to be allocated toward these aroas in order to continue to provide basic, immediate assistance to the City's City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan homeless population. Objective 7 of the Homeless Strategic Plan addresses this priority. Medium Priority M1 Provide transitional housinq for homeless families, individuals, and persons with special .needs. Transitional housing assistance is an important component of a comprehensive homeless assistance program. It provides the necessary time and training many individuals and families need in order to learn skills necessary to obtain permanent housing. In the past, the City has not funded transitional housing facilities; however, support for this activity may be provided during the five-year planning pedod. Low Priority L1 Provide permanent supportive housin.q and permanent housin.q for homeless families, individuals, and persons with special needs. Assistance in finding permanent housing may be provided by local homeless service agencies on a case-by-case basis. Assistance in this area is likely to occur as an indirect effect of other area service agencies. It is unlikely that the City will directly supply permanent housing opportunities. Obstacles to Meeting Under-Served Needs In order to address as previously under served need, the County of San Bernardino developed the Homeless Coalition, which serves the inland Empire. The primary function of the agency has been to serve as a networking opportunity for area agencies. This has served an important function toward increasing the local support network and has lead to significant data development for the region through the sponsoring of regional homeless surveys. The City will continue to support the efforts of this agency toward addressing the homeless problem. · HOMELESS STRATEGIC PLAN OBJECTIVE 7: ASSIST HOMELESS INDIVIDUALS, FAMILIES, PERSONS WITH SPECIAL NEEDS, AND THOSE AT-RISK OF HOMELESSNESS. Program 7.1: Continue to support local homeless facilities and services. The City currently provides assistance to a variety of organizations that provide immediate assistance, advocacy, and short-term shelter. The City will continue to address pdodty needs, and will continue to evaluate the provision of transitional shelter assistance. The City will support any local organization's efforts to obtain additional federal grant funds to better achieve a continuum of care. Resources: CDBG funds. Geographic Location: None of the organizations funded are located within Rancho Cucamonga; however, their regional services provide direct benefit to our jurisdiction. Accomplishments: Through June 30, 2010 assist the following number of individuals, through Page52 City of Rancho Cucarnonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan the following or similar agencies: · Foothill Family Shelter 50 · House of Ruth 8,000 · Inland Valley Council of Chumhes-West End Hunger Pregram (SOVA) 6,400 HOMELESS CONTINUUM OF CARE STRATEGY The City's goal is to develop a comprehensive homeless assistance strategy that will provide a continuum of care in order to prevent Homelessness and assist those who are homeless toward independent living. Homelessness is truly a regional problem and many factors outside an individual City's boundaries contribute to the reasons for and the number of homeless individuals in any one place. The first step in any homeless strategy is the development and support of a comprehensive regional homeless agency. The City will continue to support the efforts of the County of San Bernardino Homeless Coalition as this agency provides a valuable networking tool for the area. The City's strategy will address four following issue areas. Approximately "i,58~4'house-h0i~S have been identified az being a{ r~( of H(~r~elessr~es~. ~_s has genera!ly been defined as those renter households making less than 30% of the area median income and paying more than 30% of that on housing. Households in this income category may often pay more than 50% on housing and may not be able to afford utility payments or other basic necessities. Many area service organizations provide preventative assistance in the form of utility payments, rent assistance, food, and clothing. Fair housing activities and landlord tenant services, as provided by Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board, also function to keep residents in their existing housing. Pub!!~c hpusi~g a~s.s_is~ce~ subsidized housi_ng to those in the Iowes+.t iqcome~ ~c~.teg~_ri~s_, These ~'ff(~r{~ form an i~p°~a~t-~°~ponent-of the~h~)U~in~' St~a{e~, a-~ it is'~n°re cbst-~f~{i~e. ~_0~ keep families from becoming homeless as opposed to. the task of resettling those who h~ave already lost their housing, The City will continue to support and encourage local s_e~ic.e.. providers and public housing agencies to assist individua!.s ~n_d f.amilies~ to preveq~ Home!es_sness= IMMEDIATE ASSISTANCE AND ADVOCACY Agencies that provide outreach, assessment, and advocacy play an important role toward ensuring that either the newly homeless ara able to obtain immediate assistance, or the chronically homeless are able to exist in humane conditions and can receive assistance to alleviate the causes of their Homelessness. Many organizations operating in the West End provide outreach services, including area churches. Agencies such as SOVA are available to assist. The City will continue to support and encourage local service providers to provide immediate assistance and advocacy to homeless individuals. SHORT TERM SHELTER ASSISTANCE This component of the strategy involves emergency shelter and short-term transitional housing opportunities. Providing immediate shelter needs for those families and individuals that are homeless is particularly important especially dudng cold weather conditions. Emergency shelter is also necessary for individuals who escape threatening situations such as those fleeing Page53 ,2/5 City of Rancho Cucaroonga Community Development Block Grant program 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan domestic violence. Transitional shelter, for periods of up to thirty (30) days, would fall within this category. The City currently supports agencies that provide emergency and short-term transitional shelter, such as SOVA and House of Ruth. There are several others, including Catholic Charities and Salvation Army that provide vouchers for overnight or limited lengths of stay. The City should continue to support these activities. TRANSITION TO PERMANENT HOUSING Longer-term transitional housing and permanent housing opportunities are the final step in a comprehensive strategy toward assisting the homeless in returning to society in a fully functioning capacity so that they may obtain and retain permanent housing. Transitional housing in this instance may be for as long as two years. Several organizations in the West End provide long-term transitional shelter opportunities to families, including SOVA and Foothill Family Shelter. Organizations surveyed by the City that indicated they assist homeless in obtaining permanent shelter include Catholic Charities, SOVA, and Habitat for Humanity. The City will continue to support these types of activities. · SPECIAL NEEDS Affordable housing of all types is of tremendous need to Special Needs populations. Several populations including the Eldedy, Frail Elderly, and the Disabled also require assistance with routine maintenance as well as the additibn of handicap assistance devices. Groups dealing with alcohol or other drug addictions and persons diagnosed with AIDS or related diseases as well as the frail eldedy and disabled may require other non-housing supportive services including transportation and in-home care. Fortunately, area service providers address many of these additional supportive needs. This includes public housing residents whose needs with regard to the provision of special needs are being addressed in an extensive manner by the Housing Authority of San Bernardino County. As a result, the areas of need with the highest pdority include the provision of affordable housing and assistance with routine maintenance and handicap .assistance. High Priority H1 Assist all economic and special needs .qroups with the provision of affordable housing. Generally, all of the objectives and programs discussed under the Housing Affordability section apply to this priority. Objectives 8 and 9 of the Special Needs Strategic Plan address this pdodty. H2 Provide all Iow- and moderate-income and special needs ,qroups with rehabilitation assistance includinq handicap improvements. Should special needs individuals obtain affordable housing, the majority of their resources often go into the support of that housing; consequently, many are unable to pay for changes to their units to improve access or livability. The City currently funds rehabilitation programs that assist Iow-income special needs populations with accessibility and INability improvements. Medium Priority City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan M1 Provide non-housin.q related special needs assistance to all Iow- and moderate-income special needs .qroups. There are a large number of serve providers in the region who are able to meet most of the area's special needs. The City will consider applications for assistance from area special needs groups. Obstacles to Meeting Under-Served Needs The pdmary obstacle to meeting the needs of special needs population is providing affordable housing to all economic levels. Providing additional affordable housing is addressed under the housing needs category. · SPECIAL NEEDS STRATEGIC PLAN OBJECTIVE 8: PROVIDE NECESSARY REHABILITATION SERVICES TO SPECIAL NEEDS POPULATIONS WITH EMPHASIS ON ASSISTING THE ELDERLY AND FRAIL ELDERLY. Program 8.1: Provide minor and emergency rehabilitation services to eligible households with emphasis on assisting Iow- and moderate-income seniors. This program will complement the City's Home Improvement Program by providing minor rehabilitation and emergency assistance to Iow- and moderate-income residents and senior citizen households whose income falls below 80% of the area median family income. Permitted home repairs include minor plumbing, electrical, carpentry, and roof repairs. Residents who are owner occupants are eligible to receive two visits, up to $ 250 per visit, and in emergencies, the allowance of a one-time matedal charge for up to $ 500. Geographic Location: This program is available to eligible residents citywide. Resources: CDBG funds. Accomplishments and Time Frame: Through June 30, 2010, assist 300 households (60 households annually). OBJECTIVE 9: SUPPORT SERVICE PROVIDERS ASSISTING SPECIAL NEEDS POPULATIONS. Program 9.1: Support special needs services in areas where there are significant under-served needs. Develop and enhance senior citizen classes and activities in the focus areas of physical fitness, recreational and educational development, mental health, and emotional well-being. Geographic Location: Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center. Resources: CDBG funds. PageS5 ,217 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan Accomplishments and Time Frame: Through June 30, 2010, assist 2,750 persons (550 persons annually). · NON-HOUSING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NEEDS In order to achieve the overall goals of this plan, the development of a viable urban community, decent housing, suitable living environment, and expanding economic opportunities it is necessary to address non-housing needs. This assessment includes all parts of the community such as public improvements, public facilities, public services, and economic development. To determine what the non-housing needs of the community are, staff held a public hearing and solicited input from City departments, public and pdvate organizations, the public housing authority, and all other interested parties. The following discussion is a summary of the needs assessment obtained because of that effort. TAi~GET AREA E. VALUA~I0N B~S~I on U~e i990 Ce-r~sus data an(~ usir~g th'e quarfil~ metl~(~(]; [h~re are ~v~ qUai~e~ iow: a'n~ moderate-income target area_s w.th_in the C!ty. The_ following is a su. re_mary 9[ .tt!,.e ~su_.ryey res_u.!ts fo_[ all six-~.rg.et, areas..~ CENSO~ TRAi~T'~0~0~ BLOCK GROUP 4; This target area, wh-i~h is otherwise known as the Rochester: tract, W~S J~UiJt I~et~e~n 1.D74-and 1977. This area qualified with 35.06% of the residents Iow- and moderate-income. A total of 39% o[ the residents in this area are minority, with 30% Hispanic. Based on a prior windshield survey, few of the residences require major rehabilitation work; minor routine rehabilitation may be required throughout the .tra~t, This a_r.e_~ was relative!y recently bui!_t and th~ bas[c~ !p[rast.m_ct_u_re w.a~ i~s_ta.!!_e.d_ _at that time.. CENSUS TRAC~ This is a i~rgeJ~i0ck gr0ul~ Where 34.~9% °t t~l~ r~sicJen{~-~[~aiified as k~W~ ~nd r~ocJ~a{e-J~.,~n~., Forty-two percent of residents are minority, with 29% Hispanic. One percent of the units w_as constructed Fr!gr t~o 1940~35% be~e~en ! 94~0 ~and ! 959 and. 4_~% betwe~e-9.196~ a,n.d~ 1 ~77.~ This 'biocl~ g~:(~p-~;an-J3~ broken'into sev~rai d[ff~e~t neJ~hb0~68~; ~eadh~ WJ~%~i[ o~d characteristic. The flint area is lo.ted generally south of Via Carillo, no~h of Chaffey Street, east of Grove Avenue and west of Edwin, ~ the exception of a small ama included south of Arrow on either side of Comet Street and just south of Salina expanding to include Edwin. The se~nd ama is noffh of the railroad tracks at Via CaHIIo and south of RancheHa Street and east of Grove. The ~i~ ama is no~ of Affow Route, west of Hellman on Calle Vejar, Avenida Leon, and Avenida Castm~ south of Konocti Street. The fou~ ar~a is south o[ F~q[hi~ Bo~ey~r~, no~ ~ffOW R0~, ~s~ 9~ Archibald, and ea~ g~ Ualachi~, City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan .Area 1: His{bdcall~, k~v~r~ aS' S0u{hwest Cucamonga, this i~ {he ia~'ge~('0{ {he ar~a~sir~-'thi~s~bloc-I~ group and covers a variety of hOusing development types. Housing in this area is generally older with 4.7% built pre-1940 and 75% built between 1940 and 1959. The area with the oldest concentration of housing is located south of 9th Street, east of Grove and west of the units on Edwin· There are. a tpta_ I of 5.5 un ts 1 _8% were bu!l~t pdo_r_to_ !9_40 a_n.d .5!_% ~ ~e.re_ b_ u!l_t b_~e _t~9~ep_ 1__94_2 Portion's of t~is-a~a W(~'r~-n~{'surv~yed i~ detail for rehabil~tatTon r~s~ 'Gi"~/~ ~e g-e~er~-g~ ot the units in this area it is anticipated that significant minor and major rehabilitation will be required: Over the last 10 years, this neighborhood has receiyed s!gnificant in.fu, si@p.s_ of CP~G f_~q~_s t~ complete inf_ras'~r~c~'u_m im_ prove~epLs~ .Area 2i This-arrears a small i~ocket of approximately-60 home~ b0~nded to {~n~rth- 6y Ra~cheda Avenue, and to the south by the railroad tracks. Immediately north of Rancheda, the land uses are a mix of office and multiple family. North of San Bemardino Road, the zoning is commercial and officb. Approximately 91% of the homes were constructed between 1940 and 195.9 and are generally smaller with detached garages. Approximately 40% of the homes require minor rehabilitation. As homes in this area are older, they were developed with minimal infrastructure., Improvements re_quired i~ this area include sidewalks, cp~ a~d gu~e.r, @pd_ .n_~.w_ 07 ad~[ti_ona! stree_tligh~s.; .A~ea 3: This is a small pocket of older residential homes that were buiit in 1955 arid are surr(~undec~ by more recently constructed homes. There are approximately 39 homes in the older area that front Calle Vejar and shod portions of Avenida Leon and Avenida Castro. Based on a prior windshield survey, approximately 43% of the homes require m~nor rehabilitation. This area is al_s_o. I_a_c~kjng infra_stru~;tum !_mprovements incl~Jding sidewalk~, curb and gqtte_r @n_cl_n_ew_ s_tr.e~t_ligh~t§,~ Area 4: Thi~ ar~a i~ an 01~l~"poc~et ot'hom6s s~rrcu-nd~-d b~ nev~er in~ll dev-elol~n~ i~ca~'ju'~{ west of Archibald Avenue. The earlier development extends from Hampshire south on Malachite~ Leucite, Klusman, and Jadeite to the point just north of Friant Street. The 147 homes in this area were built between 1956 and 1957. Based on a pnor survey, this area appeared faidy well maintained with 6.8% of the homes requinng minor rehabilitation. Typical with other developments of this age in the City, the area does not have fu!l infrastrqct._u_r_e impr.o, ve~_e~ts and i~ !_ackiqg ~side. wall~s, qu_rb an.d gutter, a~d p_e~_st_reetlights_: CE_NSUS TRACT ~21 BL. OC~ GROUP 3 ~:~othili B'(~u~ev~rd~-An:0w F~o~t~i A~:~'h-i~ai(J Avenue,'~J~-~-Iermo~a'~,venu~ surr0un~l-t~rea~'-,~ total of 56.5% of the residents are considered Iow- and moderate-income, with 40% minority. Three quarters of this area was hot surveyed as it was either recently constructed multi-family or the areas had all infrastructure improv_eme_nts in and the- r.es!~.tie-! portion~s~ d_i~ po_t~ s_hg..w' s_ig~s_ _o[_ne-e.d~qg sig ni_fi_ca.n_t reha_bjl! _ta.t_i0p, Th'e'~eighb~-~h~o~-'r~th~( ~e~/on ~tmet; ar{d's~u~'~-~'mps'hi~e ~'~ W~ I~-~k'~(~ ~t-n~'~)~:~ closely. A significant proportion of homes, 45%, was built.between 1940 and 1959, 16% between 1960 and 1977 and 35% after 1977. Based on apdor survey, a majority of the homes are in verY good condition with a few requiring minor repairs. This area is in need ~of infrastructure !mp~ve_ me_n_t_s s ~u .c._h. ae. stp_ .m~_. _cl ra!q !~p_r0ye.mept~ ~pd_ t~e ~dJ~9~ The surveyed' neighborhood has an extensive amount of mature landscaping forming an attractive ~an0PY 0y_eF t.he st~re-et e-n_ ~d ~C~g a~ Rle._a~sant., !.n.t_i~te e.py!r~n~!~t_._ _~W~ .h__e_qn th[s__a_re_a ~cgm~es UP .f_o~ Page 57 ~/~ City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan P~3ssible infr~struct~J~re improvements, care should be tak~en t5 p~res~rve-th~cha!:a_cter g~_.e a~ea by reducing s dewa!k .w_dt~h~ and ~by hav!ng ~ ~idffwalk on o~e___si.~9~f the .s_treet. i-iaven'Aven~-e, 'He'rmosa ~,~enu~ 4th S~reet~an~26~h ~eet ~[Jn:0[J~J'thi~ ~r~a.--~'h'e-~j~ri~Y 0f land area within this target neighborhood, also known as Northtown, is industrially zoned, with an area of residential construction and scattered homes. This area qualified with the highest concentration of Iow- a~d ~0d~rate-income families-, .74~,?5%,.and a hig~ per_c~ Q~ge. of .h.0~e~s mquir!ng .reh_a_bi~ .ta. tiqQ; The"s~gnifican{ -n~J'~-o~'-rehabilitatio~-is be b~ed o~-seVera~ fa~{ors'in~l~ng-age of ~ ~ur~i~s; ownership, and lack of maintenance. County Assessor's data indicates that a majodty of the units were built pdor to 1977, with approximately 29% pdor to 1940, and 17% between 1940 and 1959. The Assessor's data is incomplete and reports age for 78% of the ~pits~ T~h!~ target am_a. has extreme!y h.igh ~inqdtY conc.~entr~tion of 96%, with. 9-2% Hispapi~.~ A pd~)-~wind~hie~d su~e'y that evaluated the ~xted0r a~pearanc~ o~ u~i{, providing no indi~3~on-0f intedor conditions, found that 22% require some form of major repair, while 46% require minor repair. Infrastructure needs in th!s. area are less~ significant, as_ CDBG funded improvements were provic~ed previously. Archibald Av-enu(~, i-I~-n0~saA~;en~e; Arrow Route, a~d 4{h SEe-et sur~r(~und this are~ ~n e~lua{ing this block group as a who e, 36 8% of the res dents are o_w- an~ moderate- nc~o~e_. A to_tal or 59% are- ~ nor. ties _width 48% Hi_span!_c; T~is'block group can be ~roken up intc~ severai distinct neigt~borho~d~. '~he fir:S~c~m~s~e~ area between Feron Avenue, 8th Street, Hermosa Avenue, and Archibald Avenue. The second encompasses the small group of four cul-de-sacs north of Feron including London Avenue, Pasito Avenue, Ramona Avenue, and Jersey Avenue. The third encompasses a concentration of single' family homes south of Arrow Route between Archibald and Hermosa, north of McKinley Street. The fourth area, zoned industrial, is south of 8th Street, north of Acacia Street between Archibald Avenue and Cottage Street. The remaining @re~ !n the b_lock group contains newer ~ul~-f~!ly a~p~ commercia! deve!opments. ~r~a i'i Ti~i~-are-a ~'~Ss~-n{i~l¥~'~ ~ti-n~a-{io~n i~ nei-g-~60rh-oo(~ ~ha~'acte~: ~'the~(~th~t~wn are~ identified in Census Tract 21, Block Group 6. Homes in this area are generally older with 63% built prior to 1940, and 16% between 1940 to 1959. Based on a prior windshield survey, 53% of the units require minor repair, with approximately 13% requiring roof repairs. A total of five units, 8%, were identified as requiring major repairs. Minor infrastructure i_mprove~ents ~m reclui~d !.q ~!~!s. ~.rea, with the possibility qf new or additioqa! streetligh~. ~h~ are~ includes-the L~ ca~itaS al~a~tmehJ con~l~iex, a :1 ~t-'~ni{ 1 ~nd'-~5~oom C°~nb]~x~f~F families and seniors. The complex was but by the NHDC using R~_edevelgp~en.~Age_qcy_20 Percent Set-.As.d~ funds a_s fi.n. anqjpg~ Area-2-.' ~'hJ~ ~e~-wa~- n~t ~urvey~d, as ~app~ared that t~r_~ ~e_~e re~ti~e~ requ r~ed All of th9 hq~es City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan A~a 3: Th~;'area is in need of-additi0nai infrastnJcture'[mpro~,ements, h0bSing 'r'ehai3ilitati-°n'(J0~ not appear to be a significant issue. Based on a prior windshield survey, a fraction of the homes; 5%, require minor repair. The primary reason for lack of rehabilitation needs is because of the age" of the units. A small section of homes on both sides of Ramona Avenue, Alpine and Salina Avenues were built in 1957. The remainder of the homes was built in 1977 and 1978. Infrastructure n_eeds !.n_ ~his. _area. i_n_c!qde_ the_ addi.tio~q ..o.f_s!dewa!k_ ~.nd pg~`s_ible n~ str. eet!igh_ts.~- Area 4: The area immediately south of 8th Street contains a pocket of older reSidential development surrounded by industrial uses. This entire area, including the residences, is zoned industrial. There are 19 homes in this area of which 58% were built prior to 1940 and 21% betweep. !_94p apd_ ! 959, Because o)' the in_du`strial zor~i_ng, no site impro, ve_meqt~ .surveys w.ere conducte._d~ PUBLIC FACILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS The discussion regarding target areas generally involves infrastructure improvements under this eligibility classification. Improvement of public facilities in target neighborhoods, including upgrading or providing community facilities for target populations is important in creating viable urban communities and a suitable living environment for Iow- and moderate- income residents. Most of the identified target neighborhoods are lacking adequate infrastructure improvements including paving, sidewalks, curbs and gutters, and street lighting. These neighborhoods usually have inadequate community activity spaces such as parks and community centers. The following pdodty categories have been determined. Medium Priority M1 NeiRhborhood facilities, parks, recreation facilities, and other public facilities. Several of the target neighborhoods, including Northtown and Southwest Cucamonga, have inadequate neighborhood facilities, parks, and recreation areas that are available to local residents. These projects generally require a longer time frame to accomplish than the time frame of the Consolidated Plan. Low Priority L1 Youth centers, childcare centers, water improvements, and sewer improvements. While investment in the City's youth through development of additional centers may important, it has not been identified as a need for this community. While there may be some need for water and sewer improvements in target neighborhoods, the CucamOnga Valley Water Distdct handles those issues, and the City would not spend resources in these areas. PUBLIC SERVICES Providing public services is necessary support to individuals and groups with special needs. The needs identified for special populations such as the eldedy, frail eldedy, disabled, substance abusers, persons with AIDS, and youth-at-risk populations are significant. The following priodty categories have been identified. High Priority HI Youth services, fair housinq counselinq, tenant/landlord counse in.q, as well as other Page 59 City of ~ancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan public services. These activities relate to immediate needs such as health, safety, prevention, and education. Fair Housing and TenantJLandlord counseling provide a means of ensuring that Iow- and moderate-income populations are able to maintain housing. Assisting youth-at-risk populations provide youth with a healthy and productive life style. Other types of public services relate to immediate health and safety issues including food and shelter access. Objective 11 of the Non-Housing Community Development Needs Strategic Plan addresses this pdodty. Medium Priority M1 All other public services inciudin.q senior services, handicapped services, transportation services, substance abuse services, employment traininq, cdme awareness, child care services, and health services. While many different types of public services may be beneficial to the community, because of resource allocation, the City may serve those programs that address an immediate pdodty need, or those that have accessible providers available to provide the service. As grant allocations change additional public services may be considered shoed a sufficient need be presented. ENSURE ACCESSIBILITY TO ALL PUBLIC FACILITIES AND STRUCTURES High Priority H1 Accessibility needs. Several facilities have been identified as being inadequate in meeting handicap accessibility requirements and correcting these problems has been determined to be a high priority. This includes improvements to public rights-of-way, public facilities, parks, recreation areas, and improvements to public buildings. Objective 12 of the Non-Housing Community Development Needs Strategic Plan addresses this priority. HISTORIC PRESERVATION Preservation of the City's hedtage is an important aspect of creating a sense of place to a community. It instills a pdde of place and a celebration of the achievements of those who came before us. Residential histodc preservation is already possible through the residential preservation programs the City has in place. Histodc preservation of non-residential structures must fall under the categories of public facilities and improvements or special economic development activities and are subject to the restrictions within each of those categories. Histodc preservation activities are generally limited to correcting public health and safety or code violations. Medium Priority M1 Residential and non-residential histodc preservation needs. The City has engaged, in Historic Preservation activities for residential structures over the last several years. In most cases, owners of non-residential historic structures are not Iow- or moderate-income, nor do they primarily employ lower income individuals. Should funds, and a City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Pragram 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan structure that meets eligibility criteria need assistance become available, the City will consider providing assistance at that time. Objective 13 of the Non-Housing Community Development Needs Strategic Plan addresses this pdodty. ADMINISTRATION AND PLANNING Planning activities are an essential element in the administration and implementation of federal grant programs. High Priority H1 Administration and planning activities. Planning activities are an ongoing function of the CDBG program. Planning activities take many forms, including on-going daily traditional planning activities, conducting long-range studies, developing specific functional plans, target area assessments, and evaluating histodc preservation issues. Objective 14 of the Non-Housing Community Development Needs Strategic Plan addresses this pdodty. Econo. M_I.C ~EVE~OpME~N? ~'-i~e'~eci'eve~ol~n~en~-Ag~r~y -i-r:n'l~'~ementation Pi-an f0~r "Commercial/Industrial Economic Enhancement Programs." The objective of that program is to~ strengthen the economic environment of the commercial/Industrial sector of the Redeve opmen~ project area. This is accomplished through a variety of programs designed to address the needs of existing businesses, to attract new bus nesses to the__C ty .~nd p_rgv_!d_9 !o_n~g-t.e~rr~. 9~pl..o. yrr~.~pt, t~ s*tre.ngthen and_ c.o~p![~e~ ~e_ e~.c.o~nom~y 9f ~he E~on(~mi(~ I~{/-ei0p~-~'(J~is ¢0~ on-j-ob ~e~ti(~n,~p-r~,~'g {i~-quali~-(~ l~e ~)~eS~d~ ~n'"~s~ a-n~ businesses, increasing the City's tax base, and providing opportunities for public and private partnerships, including pdvate investment in the community. Economic Development activities focus on two basic efforts: business retention and business attraction. The Redevelqpment Agency has successfully implemented a variety of marketing and promotion strategies suggested in th~ Implementation Plan that have leveraged the community's attributes as well as estab shing positive business related image. Through a comprehensive plan of advertisement campaigns, dire~ mail of newsletters, site selection information, trade shows, publishing editorials, press releases, and Intemet web page, the City has managed to receive local, regional, and even national recogn Despite this success and recognition, the Redevelopment Agency continues to work to attmc~ businesses .th_al[ fi~t the g _en_~ra! b~si_n e.s_.s_ ~nvi.rop~e. pt of t.h_~ City p~d_ a_...c_h.~eye_ _a g~_a_t~_r @~s~_~e~nc~e Improvement Loan Program. One loan was funded under this program to expand and rehabilitate shopping center located on the _s_o_u. th sid-e p~f F9o_~h_il! .Bo~u_.leyar~ 9t_ Mal__ac_.b!t.e_~Ay_e~n~u~ .W___o~ ~h_as, beeq .co_mp_le_te_d_ gp_t_h__e Pr0~JP¢_L Re,qiona Mai Site: In 1987, the Redeve opment Agency purchased and has retained an ~nterast i an approximate 92-acre site north of Foothill Boulevard and west of the 1-15 Freeway as a potentia! reg pnaJ s_hqppi.n.g ~..n.t~er. The R~d _evelpp.rne_n_l[ ~Ag ~e~_cy__h.~.s._n_9?ent___e_re_~d ~.p_~tp a~ E_~c.l_usl___.v.e_ _Rjgh_t ~_0 Page 61 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan Negotiate f(~-~{~he~de;ei0Pm~{ ~f this?si{ej De~,e~10~;'~t (~f'th~:im'l~a~n£~-~ail ~,~r~ter~l pr~[~ jobs ~9{ .o~rg~ts, ~p~ se~e ~s a ~t~qyqt fq[ ~U~.~.r ~evg]gp~ept i.~ &h~ e~st._~_p.g~io~ of~.~9 Electric~ C~i~n P~0R~':-Fro~ i 994'{~ ~ '~es~ n{~-2~ ~-~i~ ~v-e~een assis~d through the Agenc~s E!eC~l CeAifi~tion Program. This program was develoPed to assiSt Io~1 manufacturem in comp y ng wit~the N~ti0.na~ ~_ec~_~l ~_pd~r~q~i~e~o~ ~11 ~ ~qHfac~u~qg~g gj pm~P~; Ne~ B~in~ ~c~p~o~ ~-~g~ncy~-~t~'g businesses s~ing operations in ~e Ci~. The pu~ose of the re~ptions is to acquaint ne~ business ownem/opemt°m with ~i~ pe[~o~n_~[~p~ other b~sj~ S~p~ se~i~s~ ~oot~il~B~ie~a-~a~FP-r0~am: D~vel0ped-~-l~9~, and currently main~ins street bannem along the commercial fmn~ge of Foo~ill Bouleva~ ~m -15 freeway to the western C ~ Limi~, The pq~o~ o~ th ~ pr_og~ i~ ~g i~.~ ~ pi_~ p~d.~ a~A a~ract shgppe~_ a~g.t~ ~0q!eVa~.: Ec°n~mic- D~m~n~-s~r~-~ Re~ve~p~n{ ~g~ ~p~v~d-'~n Development Strategy in 1996 to provide a competitive assessment, ~rget business cluste¢ analysis, and a strategic plan for the Agenc~s e~nomic development programs. The Agency continues to ~et ad campaigns as we as ~rget indust~;ma~eting programs to implement the St~t~gy, Fax On be-~ana:yhe A~y ~evei~pe~ ~ fax o~ deman~p~mmto p~ide i~me~a~ information for companies interested in Io~ting in the Ci~. By ~1 lng a toll frae number, ~mpa. p~e~ may ob~in i~0~on qg demographics, uti!!ti~s,~prope~ a~iJa~ li__~,p~_Qi_~ s_~i~s~ insiae Ra~'&-Web~i{e: Tn 199~: the Redev~o~e~g~cY ~abli~he~ that provides up-to.ate information on available retail spa~ in ~h~. ~i~,_ Th~ ~it_~ prqvi~ demographi~in~g~a~oP b~s~d o~ 3, 5, 1~, ~p~_ ! ~,~ile r~d. ii~ Br~k~ N~-Ein~' Yhe AgenCy ha~conti~nued Cucamonga pmpe~ies. The purpose of this program is to develop positive relationships with the brokerage communi~, and to insure that bmkem who maAet pmpe~ies in Rancho Cu~p~ga_.~_~ aware of the business suppo~ sewices available to existing and prospective tenant;; B~i~ess 'A~}~t~on We~-~h~ ~ed~vel°~{ ~g~-desi~at~-~'~°n~ 'we-~k~n ~May~a~ Business Appreciation Week. Bannem saluting 1o~1 businesses am ins~lled over major Stree~ and local business ownem ~r~ tr~at.e~ t0 ~peciaJ ~edev~lop_~n} Ag~y~ Newsle~em: The Agency provides a quavery bps!qes~ ~w~!e~[ ~p~es Io~1 businesses pp buA ~e~ a~p~ ~ge~qY Trade ShowS. The Agency ~ntinued to pa~c~pate ~n ~e Intemafional Council of Shopping Cen~m (ICSC) annual Deal Making Trade Show. The Agency also focuses adve~si_~g are d StHbuted at national trade shows of interest to ~eted industHes~ Economic profile: UP~t~ tg ~h~ Fq~ P~fi[e Page 62 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan -st_rengths= Chamber of Commerce: The Agency maintained a partnership w~th the Rancho Cucamonga~ qha~mb_-e r o_f.~0J'n m_e_r(;e_t9 prg~gte !o~cal busin, e§s_-es_.and th ~e_h_cgura_gg~-e~.~u__sjp__es~ d_-ey-e~p~m_e_~t~ Sho~ Ranc-h~-G[i~e:- in an 'effort to pr0~note'~:(~or~i~ ~ty~ ~'l~-~;~-anib-e[-~~ ~-~-m~.~ partnered with the City and Redevelopment Agencyto develop a "Shop Rancho Guide." The guide includes an alphabetical !!sting _of all shopping _cent_ers_ !_n~h_e c~tY,. ~st0_re~ wit_hi_n_ t~0_-se- ~e_n.t~_e~ ~ .th-e!r ph~ o~ne_n~m__b~em_~ Com-mer~:i~i/i~taii--st~dy:'-The ~R~de'vel~)p~nt Ag~n~y'¥u'~l~-a- &~p[e~h~J~"~J~'--0{ commercial and retail segment.s 9f the pr0jegt ar~ea_.tg ~-eterm_ !.n.-e the~ .a_d _e.q.u_a_cy of_ pa_rcelA c_u~_e~n~y desjgn~t_ed _lq[ t_~Se~ -u~s-es~ Inland ~mp~e E(~0n0n~i~c ~artne{'~l~p: T~e A~r~cy C0~tinu-e~c~ pa~(~ipa{e ~'~t~-tl~ ~a~J ~r~ Economic Partnership (IEEP) to promote the Inland Empire Region. Through its involvement witl~ IEEP, the Agency participated in site searches for film !0 _c~t_io~ns~_ a_n_d !An~.a.n_d/o_r ~uil~cl_!.n. gs [o[ ~3psin_ess~ r. eloC~__tions, expansion_s, o~' sta_ ~-Up ~p.~e_r_a~iq~s~ Small Busi~ess Assistance Center: ~'~e ~edevel~pmen-t-~,ge~cy an~-Ch~mber of Commerce joihed in a cooperative effort to create a Small Business Assistance Center to provide consulting services for start-up and existing _bu-sine_ss-es. Since_the_ _ce_n_ter b-e_c~_~-e .o_perat!~o_n_~! i~_1_9_98_, ~5~ bus!n~-esses have_be_eh _a-ssist. e ~d.. M-ayo~- R0-~n~abl-~ ~-n~ ~-~'~tl~': ~he 'Aedevelopm~nt ~,ge~c~ a~d Ma~,or i~os~-~ ~'~un-d~ab~ meeting with local business leaders to discuss issues that affect Rancho Cucamonga businesses. This venue has proven to be a valuable tool in p£qmqting t_he_ po_~it_iv_-e e_xc_h.a_n_ge, o__f j~d-e~ ~a~ enhance and i~p[g.v_-e _th_-e_bu_s_iness ~;ommqni_ty. Reloc~-ion~-E~xp~ n sion ~ss-is{a~-~ei ~he Red.eloquent ~genc~ P~o~e~ech n~l ~si~nce t~ facilitate expansion in or relocation to Rancho Cucamonga. From 1994-1999, the Redevelopment Agency assisted over 47 comp~9ies i~temsted iq relo~qn or ~xpan~gp_. T_b9.~ql~ow]qg highl, jg~s tb~more signifi~nt project. __ · Mission Foods: The Agency assisted Mission Foods in the a~uisifion of land and the processing of permits for the development of ~e wodd's largest to~lla manufacturing facili~ Mission Foods invested $40 Million in ~is new facili~ and the development created . .new jobs. with the potential creation of an addition 600 jobs through suppod se~i~s. _ · BHP Steel: The Agency provided technical suppod to BHP Steel, Inc., in ~e e~ansion_of {~ exis~ng facili~ in ~e project area. The $60 Million expansion cmat~ 125 new jobs._ _ · Heritage Bag: The Agency provided technical suppod to Heal.ge Bag dudng the planning and development stages of their new fa~ili~ in.the pqoje~ a~ H~d~ge ~ag ~r~t~ approximately 150 new jobs. e- Bradshaw International: The ~g~pr~[d~d ~t~ Io~n~ch~[ ~s~s~ce~ ~k mlo~tion to Rancho Cucamonga. Bmdshaw International employs approximately 200 people, and will ~9~ be bm~kiqg g~gup~ q~ ~ 109 ~0~. sgq~r~ ~9~ ~nsion to existing facili~; · Schlosser Forge: Schlosser Forge manufactures jet engine mtom, rings, and ~ses for indust~ gian~ such as Pmff & Whitney, G.E. Aircraft Engine, and Rolls-Roy~. Schlosse¢ Fore has doubled its employeg~ o~e[ 3__~ i.~ t~e p~t ~h_.r~9.y~.~ ~nd has ~ns~ct~ ~ Page 63 ,22_5 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan · Sears Credit Center:. As part of the improvements related to their development, the Agency assisted the developer with street improve._m_en_ts_. ~The _resu_lfing _deye!op.~e~ approximately 1,000 new jobs. · Frito-Lay. The Agency partnered wifl~-~,i~-a~-~oc-~l ag~ci~s-~o~SiS~ the permitting process. A Iow-interest loan of $600,000 was also used to help wi~ permitting fees. As a result, Frito-Lay expanded their warehouse by 250,~00__0 s-.q.u_a~re . installed an additional manufacturing line, creating 180 new full-time jobs._ · Gear Technology. The Agency participated with Gear Technology in the Agency's Third Party Electrical Certification Program allowing them to comply with the required electrical code_s: Ge_arTechnolo_gy move_d ipto a_ !6.,_00~0 s.quare fo_ot bqil~ing a..~d c_yeate_d2_6 p~wj0b_s~ Apart from the specifics of the Commercial/Industrial Economic Enhancement Program, the Agency assists compames through participation in the following programs. The Inland Empire Small Business Development Center ISBDC), which offers a vadety of resources to improve business operation including, business consulting, seminars and workshops, information resources, procurement assistance, environmental assistance, and a varietyof other programs. The California Statewide Communities Development Authority (Califomia Communities) specializes in issuing tax; exempt financing for public agencies and eligible pdvate agencies for industrial, housing, non-pm~ and other tax-exempt facilitie_s¢ These programs assist local agencies tq achieve ~ec0nomic,' financial an_d soc!~l goals_, Low Priority L1 Commercial-industrial rehabilitation and infrastructure improvements; micro-business, other business, and technical assistance; and other economiC development needs. The RDA provides adequate incentives for economic development through programs and activities that are outlined in the Commercial/Industrial Economic Enhancement Program. While economic development is important to the community, those activities will be better supported from public and private agencies outside this arena. Objective 15 of the Non-Housing Community Development Needs Strategic Plan addresses this priority. OTHER COMMUNIT~ DEVELOPMENT NEEDS A broad range of miscellaneous activities fall under this category including Energy Efficiency, Lead Based Paint Hazards, and Code Enforcement. Ail of these activities relate to residential rehabilitation and are generally addressed through those programs. Medium Priority M1 Energy efficiency, lead based paint hazards, and code enforcement. All of the above issues are currently addressed through the Home Improvement Program. At the time of application, review, and inspection of a home eligible for assistance consideration of the above items are taken into account and addressed whenever there is an identified problem. As energy efficiency assists in making homes affordable to lower income families, energy efficient appliances and fixtures are routinely specified in work orders. Lead based paint hazards ara evaluated for all homes that were constructed prior to 1978 and have children under the age of seven living in them. If a child in the home has an elevated blood lead level then defective chewable surfaces will be treated and lead abated. Code Enforcement issues are addressed at the time assistance is provided and alleviated to the extent possible. Page64 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development B~ock Grant Program 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan Objective 16 of the Non-Housing Community Development Needs Strategic Plan addresses this pdority. · NON-HOUSING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NEEDS STRATEGIC PLAN OBJECTIVE 10: PROVIDE IMPROVEMENTS TO PUBLIC AREAS AND PUBLIC FACILITIES TO ENHANCE LIVING ENVIRONMENTS, IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF LIFE IN LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME NEIGHBORHOODS, AND FOR LOWER INCOME INDIVIDUALS, SENIORS, AND THE HANDICAPPED. Program 10.1: Complete all necessary infrastructure and sidewalk improvements in qualified target areas. The Engineering Department has prepared a five-year capital improvement plan that addresses street reconstruction, new sidewalk additions, and repair to existing sidewalks throughout target neighborhoods. This generally involves the repair and replacement of existing sidewalk sections that are in poor or hazardous conditions inhibiting the mobility of handicapped persons. Resources: CDBG funds. Geographic Location: infrastructure and sidewalk improvements will occur in qualified target neighborhoods. Other public facility improvements will occur at locations that are eligible based on the target area population they serve, for example, a senior center serving a senior population. Accomplishments: Infrastructure improvements in the City's target neighborhoods over the next five years will include the following: · Northtown Area 1 Pavinq Rehabilitation: The design and construction of street oveday. Includes Feron Street (between Archibald Avenue and Hermosa Avenue), Jersey Boulevard (between London Avenue to Ramona Avenue), London Avenue (north of Feron Boulevard), Pasito Avenue (north of Jersey Boulevard), Ramona Avenue (north of Feron Boulevard), Belmont Avenue (south of Eighth Street), Cottage Avenue (south of Eighth Street), Main Street (between Archibald Avenue and Ramona Avenue), Reid Street (between Feron Boulevard and Main Street), and Acacia Street (east 0f Amhibald Avenue). Activity improvements will occur in CT 21, BG 7. · Northtown Area 2 Pavinq Rehabilitation: The design and construction of street oveday. Includes Center Street (between Humbolt Street and 2§th Street), Humbolt Street (between Hermosa Avenue and Haven Avenue), 24th Street (between Humbolt Street and Marine Street), 25th Street (between Humbolt Street and Marine Street), and 26th Street (between Hermosa Avenue and Center Street). Activity improvements will occur in CT 21, BG 6. · Northtown Area 1 and 2 Alley Rehabilitation: The design and construction of alley overlay. Includes alley between Feron Boulevard and Main Street, between Archibald Avenue and Belmont Avenue, and between 25th Street and 26th Street. CT 21, BG 6 & 7. · Hellman/Arrow Drainage Improvements: The repair of existing under capacity drainage improvements, to increase capacity and allow for removal of debds, thereby reducing the incidence of nuisance water in the street intersection. Activity improvements will occur in CT 21, BG 2. · Calle Velar: The design and construction of improvements to Calle Vejar from Avenida Page65 City of Rancho Cucarnonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan Leon to Hellman and Avenida Leon from Arrow to Calle Vejar. Includes the installation of street improvements. Activity improvements will occur in CT 21, BG 2. Sidewalk Repair and Replacement: Removal and replacement of all incidents of inaccessible sidewalk sections throughout the target areas, approximately 19,800 square feet (3,960 square feet annually). Activity improvements may be carried out in all eligible neighborhoods including CT 21, BG 2, 3, 6, & 7; CT 20.07, BG 5. Program 10.2: Development of a Fire Safety Awareness Program. The development of a fire safety awareness program that would include outreach efforts in target neighborhoods. An actual program activity has not yet been developed. Resources: CDBG funds. Geographic Location: This program would be focused in the City's qualified target neighborhoods. Accomplishments: Through June 30, 2010 assist 100 residents through the implementation of a fire safety awareness program. Program 10.3: Provide funding to support the implementation of a job center located in the southwest Cucamonga area. Activity 10.6.1: The job center assists Iow-income individuals by providing a safe and central place to seek employment opportunities and services such as English as a. Second Language. The request includes leasing of the office trailer, preparation of the project site, utilities, and bathroom rentals. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga City Manager's Office; however, the job center will be operated in conjunction with a non-profit agency, such as Somebody Cares-Southland. Geographic Location: The job center trailer is located near the southeast comer of Grove Avenue and Arrow Route. Resources: CDBG funds and City general fund. Accomplishments and Time Frame: Through June 30, 2010, provide for the support of the job center activity. OBJECTIVE 11: ASSIST LOCAL PUBLIC AND NON-PROFIT SERVICE AGENCIES THAT IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF LIFE FOR LOW- AND MODERATE- INCOME PERSONS AND THOSE WITH SPECIAL NEEDS. Program 11.1: Assist public service agencies that assist groups in the highest priority categories including: fair housing counseling, landlord- tenant mediation, homeless and food assistance, emergency shelters, domestic violence shelters, and senior, youth-at-risk, and literacy programs. The City will continue to assist public service providers that improve the quality of life for Iow- and moderate-income persons and those with special needs. City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant program 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan Resources: CDBG funds. Geographic Location: While most of the agencies funded are not located within the City's jurisdictional boundaries, all City residents are eligible to receive services. Accomplishments: Through June 30, 2010, assist the following number of individuals or households through the following or similar agencies: · Fair Housing 1,940 Persons · Landlord/Tenant 1,140 Households · Domestic Violence Shelters 8,000 Persons · Food Distribution 6,400 Persons · Youth-at-Risk 800 Persons · Senior Nutrition 2,850 Persons · Literacy 500 Persons oBJEcTIVE 12: ENSURE ACCESSIBILITY TO ALL PUBLIC FACILITIES AND STRUCTURES. Program 12.1: Installation of handicap wheelchair ramps at all curb returns. This program has been underway for several years with the goal of providing handicap accessibility at all curb returns in the City. Resources: CDBG funds. Geographic Location: The benefits of the program occur citywide. Accomplishments: Through June 30, 2010, provide approximately 14,400 square feet of curbing for handicapped ramps (2,880 square feet annually). Program 12.2: Complete handicap accessibility requirements at other eligible public recreation facilities, including Old Town Park. Old Town Park primarily serves the Northtown target neighborhood and the southern portion of the City. It was originally constructed using CDBG funds. Resources: CDBG funds. Geographic Location: Public facilities that may be assisted are wide ranging and may include the Old Town Park. Assistance may be located in the Northtown target neighborhood or may be at any public facility in the City. Accomplishments: Through June 30, 2010, complete the installation of handicap accessibility improvements at Old Town Park. OBJECTIVE 13 Program 13.1: THE RESTORATION AND PRESERVATION OF PROPERTIES OF SOCIAL VALUE FOR HISTORIC, ARCHITECTURAL, AND AESTHETIC REASONS. The rehabilitation of significant historic structures, with primary Page 67 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan emphasis on residential assistance. It is already possible for the City to provide residential rehabilitation through the Home Improvement program. In many instances the cost to rehabilitate a historic structure will exceed the $25,000 limit. In such an instance the structure may qualify for rehabilitation as a historic property. Resources: CDBG funds and Redevelopment 20 Percent Set-Aside funds. Geographic Location: There are many historic structures located throughout the City that may be eligible for funding under this program. Accomplishments: Through June 30, 2010, complete the rehabilitation of three historic structures including the Chaffey-lsle House, Norton-Fisher House, and Etiwanda Railway Station. OBJECTIVE 14: PROVIDE THE NECESSARY PLANNING AND ADMINISTRATIVE CAPACITY TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY'S CDBG PROGRAM AND THE PROVISIONS OF THE CONSOLIDATED PLAN. Program 14.1: Provide for the necessary planning and administrative activities of the CDBG program. Resources: CDBG funds. Geographic Location: Benefits are provided Citywide. Accomplishments: Through June 30, 2010, administer and implement the CDBG program. This includes the completion of program applications and performance reports, research and analysis, target area studies, historic preservation evaluations, and housing documents. OBJECTIVE 15: ALLEVIATE PHYSICAL AND RELATED ECONOMIC DISTRESS THROUGH THE STIMULATION OF PRIVATE INVESTMENT AND COMMUNITY REVITALIZATION IN IDENTIFIED TARGET NEIGHBORHOODS. Program 15.1: Support housing and Community Development activities that stimulate economic development. On January 16, 2002, the City Council adopted the Foothill Boulevard/Historic Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan. The City's Foothill Boulevard and Economic Task Force reviewed existing Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan policies and developed standards for softscape improvements that will occur within the street right-of-way. These improvements will include signage, street furniture, landscaping, etc, to establish a unified street theme. The Visual Improvement Plan will be implemented by private development as vacant properties fronting along Foothill Boulevard develop, and through public improvements where the street frontage is currently improved. The purpose of the Visual Improvement Plan is to develop a design specification plan that will set forth design concepts for the streetscape improvements within the public rights--of-way and entry areas along the entire length of Foothill Boulevard. The plan will help guide a balanced and unified pattern of streetscape for both public and private development. By drawing upon the existing positive improvements and developing a set of unique and unifying historic elements, this plan will ensure that Foothill Boulevard will be an exciting reflection of the historic Route 66 Page 68 CiJy of Rancho Cucarnonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan as well as a historic Rancho Cucamonga. A variety of improvements have been installed along Foothill Boulevard, in the vicinity of the Victoria Gardens mall; however, much of the Visual Improvement Plan has not yet been implemented. Foothill Boulevard, west of Haven Avenue is older with mixed uses and appears to be roaching stages of economic distress, while the area east of Haven Avenue has primarily new development and vacant land. The concern is with revitalization of the older areas and planning land use to ensure effective and balanced growth along Foothill Boulevard. The City has formed a task fome to review the planning and land use issues along Foothill Boulevard. Resources: City General fund. Geographic Location: Approximately six miles from Grove Avenue to East Avenue. Accomplishments: Through June 30, 2010, continue analysis and implementation of the Foothill Boulevard/Historic Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan. OBJECTIVE 16: REVITALIZE AND UPGRADE HOUSING CONDITIONS, PREVENT AND ELIMINATE BLIGHT AND BLIGHTING INFLUENCES, AND ELIMINATE CONDITIONS DETRIMENTAL TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, AND WELFARE. Program 16.1: Continue improvements to residential energy efficiency, lead-based paint hazard reduction, and code enforcement through the City's Home Improvement Program. Resources: CDBG funds. Geographic Location: The Home improvement Program is implemented Citywide. Accomplishments: Through June 30, 2010, assist 10 households. Program '16.2: Continue funding of the Graffiti Removal Program. Effective graffiti removal functions to alleviate conditions of slum and blight in target neighborhoods. Resources: CDBG funds. Geographic Location: Graffiti removal is an area benefit eligible in all qualified target neighborhoods. Accomplishments: Through June 30, 2010, remove 75,000 square feet of graffiti (15,000 square feet annually). · OBSTACLES TO MEETING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NON-HOUSING NEEDS The greatest obstacle to meeting community development non-housing needs is a lack of available resoumes, primarily funding. Most public facility and infrastructure improvements are relatively expensive and would utilize the majority of the available CDBG resources. During the development of each Annual Action Plan, these priorities will be balanced with the need to Page69 ,251 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan meet other housing, homeless, and special need priorities. · STRATEGY TO REMOVE BARRIERS TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING There were no public policies identified that result in significant negative effects on the cost of housing or the incentives to develop, maintain, or improve housing in the City. The vadous policies, codes, and regulations that are in place that affect the development of housing, are necessary to protect the health and safety of residents and to provide for the long-term benefit of the community. · LEAD BASED PAINT HAZARD REDUCTION STRATEGY In the first section of this document a summary estimate of the number of units with a potential lead-based paint hazard were identified. Over the next five years, actions will be undertaken in conjunction with the CDBG Home Improvement Program consistent with current federal requirements for that program. HUD requires that for any program utilizing CDBG funds, ail owners, and/or tenants be notified in writing about the dangers of lead-based paint through notification, lead hazard evaluation, lead hazard reduction, and on-going maintenance. If a child residing in the home has an Environmental Intervention Blood Lead Level (EIBLL) then proscribed activities will be followed. To the extent possible, given availability of funding, lead- based paint, when identified, will be treated, and/or abated from those units when children with an EIBLL have not been identified. it is recommended that all housing rehabilitation activities carried out as part of the Redevelopment Agency's efforts follow the same guidelines as those used for the CDBG program for lead-based paint removal. In those instances where federal CDBG funds are utilized in conjunction with a Redevelopment Agency project, these policies will be stdctly applied. · ANTI-POVERTY STRATEGY The City has no control over the many factors that affect the determination of an individual's income level. The pdmary activity that may be utilized by the City toward this end would be the support of public service agencies that incorporate job training and life skills development into their programs, which includes most of those groups currently receiving funding. All of the priorities, goals, and programs outlined in the Consolidated Plan's five-year strategy under Affordable Housing and One-Year Action Plan are ultimately intended to provide a viable stock of affordable housing, much of which will be available to Iow-income households and those below poverty level. The objectives and programs specified in the remaining sections of the five-year strategy will also serve in conjunction with Affordable Housing to meet the needs of the lower income and poverty level families. Through the combination of support services and available housing, and the efforts of the City, other local jurisdictions, and other public and private agencies assisting in this area a reduction may be made in the number of individuals below poverty level. In order to provide a truly comprehensive program committed toward reducing the number of households below poverty level, efforts will be required from both the state and federal government. · INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURE AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL COOPERATION Page 70 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan The institutional structure {hrough which an Affordable Housing strategy is carried out involves separate department and institutional divisions within the City itself, as well as the involvement of organizations outside the City. Other than the consistent participants in this effort, it would be difficult to determine who and what agencies might be involved over a five-year period, as individual and organizational involvement will change from project to project. PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS Within the City there are two pdmary public agencies functioning, the general City with its many departments and City Council, and the Redevelopment Agency. Decisions regarding resource allocation are made by the City Council. In making these decisions, the City Council receives input from City staff and interested citizens. Based on this input, policies are approved for utilization of available funds. City departments then carry out the actual implementation of these policies. The Community Development Department Planning Division oversees the implementation of general City housing programs through the CDBG program through activities such as the Home Improvement Program and public service agencies. The members of the City Council, sitting as the Redevelopment Agency Board, direct activities of the Redevelopment Agency. RDA staff are a separate division within the City, but coordinate efforts with other departments in the implementation of housing programs using 20 Percent Set Aside Funds. Given the extent of this fund, the housing related activities are often more complex and involve more input from outside agencies, whether public or private, for consultation, funding availability, and coordination. The City is an active participant in the County HOME Consortium to assist the City's overall housing strategy. The County operates five programs through the HOME Consortium that include the HOME Homeownership Assistance Program (HAP), HOME Tenant Based Rental Assistance (TBRA) Program, HOME Rental Property Acquisition and Rehabilitation Program, HOME Multifamily Rental Property Rehabilitation/Refinance Program, and the HOME Community Housing Development Organization (CHDO) Program. These programs are all available to City residents on a first-come first-serve basis through the City's participation in the County HOME Consortium. The Housing Authority of San Bernardino County also provides affordable housing in the community. The Housing Authority was created and formally organized in 1941 as a political entity operating independently from other governmental agencies. Programs offered to Rancho Cucamonga residents include the Section 8 CertificateJoucher program and scattered site public housing. The Housing Authority may operate independently of the City in the acquisition of new single-family scattered site public housing. However, they must obtain the City's concurrence to expend funds under the Comprehensive Grant Program. NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS Two non-profit housing agencies are currently working with the RDA to construct, purchase, and/or manage Iow-income housing units within the City. The SCHDC was incorporated in 1992 for the purpose of acquiring, constructing, maintaining, and/or managing housing units for Iow-income households. SCHDC, with assistance from the RDA, acquired vadous complexes containing 1,145 units with 553 held as affordable. The RDA has committed 1.8 million a year for 30 years to SCHDC for the acquisition of affordable housing. Pa.,, 293 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan The second housing non-profit is the NHDC. The RDA assisted members of the Northtown neighborhood with the formation of a 501(c)(3) non-profit in 1993. The purpose of the organization is to establish, maintain, and operate housing units for Iow-income households in the Northtown neighborhood. Other non-profit agencies involved in providing assistance, and which currently receive assistance from the City through its CDBG program include House of Ruth, Inland Mediation, SOVA, Foothill Family Shelter, and the YMCA. Activities provided by these agencies ara vaded and include homeless outreach, assessment and emergency shelter assistance, fair housing and landlord/tenant counseling, food distribution and youth-at-risk programs. PRIVATE INDUSTRY Private industry involved in the production of affordable housing will primarily involve financial and lending institutions or through restrictions on pdvate development. Pdvate development assistance may be brought about as the result of development agreement requirements or conditions of approval to a project. This was the case with both Lewis Homes in the Terra Vista Community Plan and the William Lyon Company in the Victoria Community Plan, where as trade off for approval of large master plans, the developers agreed to provide a certain percentage of affordable units. There are numerous programs and private corporations that provide funding and assistance available to assist in leveraging funding for affordable housing projects. Some of these include the Federal National Mortgage Association (FannieMae), California Community Reinvestment Corporation (CCRC), Affordable Housing Program (AHP), as well as programs offered to comply with the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA). · OVERCOMING GAPS In 1990, the RDA adopted a comprehensive housing program, the adoption of the Affordable Housing Strategy provided long-term direction for this program. The implementation of these strategies, the increasing expertise of staff, as well as new documentation requirements from HUD results in more efficient, and productive program assistance delivery. The public agency programs discussed generally function independently of one another. The raasons for this are varied, differing eligibility requirements and objectives, limited resoumes, specialized staff and specific reporting requirements. While those involved in implementation of the programs are able to do so in an efficient and effective manner, efforts to combine objectives and pool resources might improve their effectiveness. Assistance by the Housing Authodtywill generally continue to function independently from local agencies and the City will work with the agency to combine efforts and to continue to provide support for their activities. In evaluation of various social service agencies, whether non-profit or public, lack of comprehensive coordination among these agencies is likely the biggest problem. While those agencies receiving funding from the City may provide assistance and report results in a consistent manner, others may not and may not be interested in doing so if funding is not available. The establishment of organizations such as the San Bernardino County Homeless Coalition is a means to help this problem by providing coordinating and networking opportunities for these agencies as well as proving a consistent reporting effort through an annual homeless census. Continued coordinating efforts and information dispersal by the Homeless Coalition will improve the service delivery system for the area. Page72 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant program 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan STRATEGY TO OVERCOME GAPS The most consistent issue in providing affordable housing assistance is in the coordinating efforts. With an increasing focus on affordable housing and the increasing expertise of those involved in service delivery, progress has been and should continue to be made toward this end. As public agency programs evolve, coordination of efforts will become easier and more beneficial. Continued support of local coordinating agencies such as the San Bemardino Homeless Coalition is encouraged to increase the efficiency in service delivery. · COORDINATION EFFORTS Throughout this document efforts were made to descdbe the coordination of efforts of various service providers to address the affordable housing needs in the West End region. Most coordination efforts are tied to funding resources and the character of the service provided. The City will continue to encourage and support coordination efforts of the many varied organizations including vadous public, governmental, health, mental health, and service agencies through such groups as the San Bemardino Homeless Coalition and the Redevelopment Agency. · PUBLIC HOUSING RESIDENT INITIATIVES MANAGEMENT The Housing Authority of San Bemardino County coordinates a resident council, where public housing residents are elected to the board. The Council meets monthly and has an impact on such things from organizing youth sports events to evaluating the Comprehensive Grant Application. The Housing Authority implements a Family Self-Sufficiency program for its Section 8 participants. If eligible participants are interested, they must sign a five-year contract with the ultimate goal to be economically independent and self-sufficient. To assist families in reaching this goal, supportive services are provided and include education, job training, childcare, transportation, medical, counseling, and case management. HOME OWNERSHIP The Housing Authority participates in programs to assist residents in becoming homeowners. As a primary step toward this activity, the City will support such an application. However, the fact that many residents have difficulty meeting their rent payments and they may be unable to meet the costs associated with home ownership. As a result, a long-term program of the Housing Authority should be to provide job training and life skills assistance. MANAGEMENT AND OPERATION The focus of the Housing Authority is to comply with Fair Housing requirements. This is accomplished through a centralized work order system, the Family Self-Sufficiency program, screening of tenants, expanding resident employment, efficient in the use of inventory, resident management training, and drug elimination programs. LIVING ENVIRONMENT The Housing Authority currently owns 16 public housing units within the City. All 16 are reported to be in excellent condition. With the concurrence of the City, the Housing Authority Page 73 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan received funding through the Comprehensive Grant Program to address physical and management needs of the units. Lead-based paint testing and abatement are the highest priority with new roofs, security measures, and various other structure and site improvements planned. Page74 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM 2005-2006 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN (JULY 1, 2005 TO JUNE 30, 2006) Draft Available - April 5, 2005 Draft Review - April 20, 2005 Proposed for Adoption - May 4, 2005 ,2J7 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2006 Annual Action Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS APPLICATION FOR FEDERAL ASSISTANCE (HUD-424) ....................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................. 2 RESOURCES AVAILABLE ......................................................................................... ; .......................... 2 FEDERAL RESOURCES .......................................................................................................... 2 OTHER RESOURCES ............................................................................................................. 3 LEVERAGING AND MATCHING FUNDS ..................................................................................... 3 ACTIVITIES TO BE UNDERTAKEN ........................................................................................................ 4 AFFORDABLE HOUSING ......................................................................................................... 4 OBJECTIVE 1 - CONSERVATION OF THE EXISTING SINGLE-FAMILY AND MULTIPLE- FAMILY AFFORDABLE HOUSING STOCK ..................................................................... 4 OBJECTIVE 2 - IMPROVE ACCESS TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOR ALL LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS, WITH EMPHASIS ON THE PRODUCTION OF LARGER ' (3+ BEDROOM) RENTAL UNITS .................................................................................. 5 OBJECTIVE 3 ~ PROVIDE DIRECT RENTER ASSISTANCE TO LOW- AND MODERATE- INCOME HOUSEHOLDS IN ORDER TO OBTAIN OR RETAIN PERMANENT HOUSING ........ 6 OBJECTIVE 4 - INCREASE HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES FOR LOW- AND MODERATE- INCOME OWNERSHIP, PARTICULARLY THROUGH HOMEBUYER ASSISTANCE .............. 7 OBJECTIVE 5 - REHABILITATION OF THE EXISTING HOUSING STOCK WITH EMPHASIS ON .OWNER-OCCUPIED HOUSING .............................................................................. 8 OBJECTIVE 6 - IMPROVE LIVING CONDITIONS FOR LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS ........................................................................................................... 9 HOMELESS STRATEGIC PLAN .............................................................................................. 10 OBJECTIVE 7 -- ASSIST HOMELESS INDIVIDUALS, FAMILIES, AND PERSONS WITH SPECIAL NEEDS, AND THOSE AT-RISK OF HOMELESSNESS ..................................... 10 HOMELESS ANNUAL PLAN .... ................................................................................................ 11 SPECIAL NEEDS .......................................................................................... : ....................... 1 1 OBJECTIVE 8 - PROVIDE NECESSARY REHABILITATION SERVICES TO SPECIAL NEEDS POPULATIONS WITH EMPHASIS ON ASSISTING THE ELDERLY AND FRAIL ELDERLY **. 1 1 OBJECTIVE 9 - SUPPORT SERVICE PROVIDERS ASSISTING SPECIAL NEEDS POPULATIONS ......................................................................................................... 11 SPECIAL NEEDS ANNUAL PLAN ........................................................................................... 12 NON-HOUSING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NEEDS ............................................................. 1 2 OBJECTIVE 10 -- PROVIDE IMPROVEMENTS TO PUBLIC AREAS AND PUBLIC FACILITIES TO ENHANCE LIVING ENVIRONMENTS, IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF LIFE IN LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME NEIGHBORHOODS, AND FOR LOWER INCOME INDIVIDUALS, SENIORS, AND THE HANDICAPPED ........................................................................... 12 OBJECTIVE 1 1 - ASSIST LOCAL PUBLIC AND NON-PROFIT SERVICE AGENCIES THAT IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF LIFE FOR LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME PERSONS AND THOSE WITH SPECIAL NEEDS .................................................................................. 13 OBJECTIVE 12 - ENSURE ACCESSIBILITY TO ALL PUBLIC FACILITIES AND STRUCTURES OBJECTIVE 13 - THE RESTORATION AND PRESERVATION OF PROPERTIES OF SOCIAL VALUE FOR HISTORIC, ARCHITECTURAL, AND AESTHETIC REASONS ........................ 16 OBJECTIVE 14 -- PROVIDE THE NECESSARY PLANNING AND ADMINISTRATIVE CAPACITY TO IMPLEMENT THE CDBG PROGRAM AND THE CONSOLIDATED PLAN ..... 17 OBJECTIVE 15 - ALLEVIATE PHYSICAL AND RELATED ECONOMIC DISTRESS THROUGH THE STIMULATION OF PRIVATE INVESTMENT AND COMMUNITY REVITALIZATION IN City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2006 Annual Action Plan IDENTIFIED TARGET NEIGHBORHOODS .................................................................... 18 OBJECTIVE 16 -- REVITALIZE AND UPGRADE HOUSING CONDITIONS; PREVENT AND ELIMINATE BLIGHT AND BLIGHTING INFLUENCES; AND ELIMINATE CONDITIONS DETRIMENTAL TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, AND WELFARE ............................. 19 OTHER ACTIONS ............................................................................................................................. 19 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT .................................................................................................. 19 AFFIRMATIVELY FURTHERING FAIR HOUSING ...................................................................... 20 OBSTACLES TO MEETING UNDER SERVED NEEDS ............................................................... 23 ACTIONS TO FOSTER AND MAINTAIN AFFORDABLE HOUSING ............................................... 23 ACTIONS TO REMOVE BARRIERS TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING ............................................... 23 ACTIONS TO EVALUATE AND REDUCE LEAD BASED PAINT HAZARDS .................................... 24 ACTIONS TO REDUCE THE NUMBER OF POVERTY LEVEL FAMILIES ....................................... 24 ACTIONS TO DEVELOP INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURE AND ENHANCE COORDINATION .............. 24 PUBLIC HOUSING IMPROVEMENTS ....................................................................................... 24 MONITORING ....................................................................................................................... 24 CITIZEN PARTICIPATION .................................................................................................................. 25 APPENDIX "A" - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................. 1 2005-2006 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN ........................................................................................ 1 APPENDIX "B" - SUMMARY OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING 5-YEAR AND 1-YEAR GOALS .......................... 1 APPENDIX "C" - ATTACHMENTS ........................................................................................................ SUPPORTING MAPS: PROPOSED PROJECTS, POINTS OF INTEREST, LoW/MOD INCOME, ETHNIClTY, AND UNEMPLOYMENT .......................................................................................... 1 SUPPORTING FORMS: FUNDING SOURCES, CONTINUUM OF CARE: GAPS ANALYSIS, SPECIAL NEEDS/NON-HOMELESS, HOUSING NEEDS, AND COMMUNITY NEEDS .................................... 1 LISTING OF PROPOSED PROJECTS ........................................................................................ 1 CERTIFICATIONS ................................................................................................................... I City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2006 Annual Action Plan APPLICATION FOR FEDERAL ASSISTANCE (FORM HUD-424) The Application for Federal Assistance will be inserted into the final report. Page I City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2006 Annual Action Plan INTRODUCTION The Annual Action Plan provides a plan of investment and an outline of activities expected to be undertaken during the 2005-2006 program year. The report identifies local objectives and priodty needs identified to implement the primary objective of the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program, which is the development of viable urban communities by providing decent housing, suitable living environment, and expanded economic opportunities, principally for Iow- and moderate-income persons. RESOURCES AVAILABLE · FEDERAL RESOURCES Community Development Block Grant Federal funding available to the City are allocated through the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) CDBG program. During the 2005-2006 program year, the City will receive an entitlement allocation of $1,134,608, which is $ 45,392 less than fiscal year 2004-2005. CDBG funds reprogrammed from prior year activities are $149,513.00, which provides $1,284,121.00 available for funding program activities (see Appendix "A"). Included within the total of funds reprogrammed from prior year activities is $124,5'13 in program income the City received during the 2003-2004 program year; this program income is functionally a revolving loan fund tied to the City's Home Improvement Program. San Bernardino County Housing Authority The San Bernardino County Housing Authority serves as the local housing authority for the region. The Agency currently operates 170 Section 8 housing units and 16 public housing units located within the City. Sources of funds available to City residents through the Housing Authority ara primarily limited to Section 8, Comprehensive Grant Improvement, and the Public Housing programs. County of San Bernardino, Department of Economic and Community Development (ECD) The County receives federal funds to implement the HOME Consortium, which the City joined in July 1995. In 1999 the City renewed their commitment to the HOME Consortium by signing a 3-year Cooperation Agreement covering the period from October 1, 1999 to September 30, 2002. The City will be renewed the 3-year agreement to cover the period from October 1, 2002 to September 30, 2005. On March 30, 2005, the City signed a Certificate of Interest to continue with a cooperative agreement for the next 3-year period. The County operates five programs through the HOME Consortium that include the HOME Homeownership Assistance Program (HAP), HOME Tenant-Based Rental Assistance (TBRA) Program, HOME Rental Property Acquisition and Rehabilitation Program, HOME Multifamily Rental Property Rehabilitation/Refinance Program, and the HOME Community Housing Development Organization (CHDO) Program. The County allocation for these programs total $ 4,600,000 and includes funds for program administration. The HAP, TRBA, and Rental Property Acquisition and Rehabilitation programs are discussed as specific activities in the Consolidated Plan. The CHDO Set-Aside program is not identified and therefore warrants further discussion. Page 2 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2006 Annual Action Plan The CHDO program is funded through a mandatory Set-Aside from the HOME Consortium and provides funds for affordable housing that is developed, sponsored, or owned by non-profits that have been certified as CHDO's. The CHDO program functions as a source of funding for a variety of projects including new construction and rehabilitation of residential structures. Funds are not targeted to a specific area or project type within the County; however, recipient income cannot exceed 80% of the County medium family income. Funds are available to eligible residents on a first-come first-serve basis through the City's participation in the HOME Consortium, with approximately $ 2,140,000 allocated to the CHDO program. · OTHER RESOURCES City of Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency State law requires redevelopment agencies to set aside at least 20% of tax increment revenue for increasing and improving the community's supply of Iow- and moderate-income housing. Between July 1, 2005, and June.30, 2010, approximately $ 72,697,638 will be generated by tax increment for affordable housing. The tax increment allocation to the 20 Percent Set-Aside during the reporting period is projected to be $10,877,680. The Agency's tax increment has been pledged against several on-going projects, and therefore, there is little unobligated funding available. In July 1996, the Redevelopment Agency (RDA) approved the sale of tax allocation bonds to provide permanent financing for two community based non-profit organizations, Southern California Housing Development Corporation (SCHDC) and Northtown Housing Development Corporation (NHDC). On September 1, 1996, Tax Allocation Bonds in the amount of $ 37.66 million were sold. Proceeds of the bonds will be allocated in the following manner: A pledge agreement through the year 2025 was signed with SCHDC where $ 3.9 million will be provided annually for debt services and project reserves. Beginning year 6, if the provision of Redevelopment Law that allows for the acquisition of existing units with Housing Set-Aside funds has been extended beyond its current sunset, this $ 790,000 of the annual pledge will be deposited into a "Future Project Reserves" fund for use in acquiring additional apartment complexes within the Project Area. If a program is not developed, the funds will be available for any RDA housing program. A pledge agreement through the year 2025 was signed with NHDC where $1.5 million was paid to NHDC on June 30, 1996, and again on December 30, 1996. An additional $ 5 million in net bond proceeds were also paid to the NHDC. These bond proceeds will be used to complete a portion of the capital improvement plan for the Northtown neighborhood that includes continuing the development of infill housing on vacant lots, acquisition and rehabilitation of existing absentee-owned housing. The annual pledge amount will be $1.4 million through the year 2025. · LEVERAGING AND MATCHING FUNDS The primary source of fund leveraging will occur through RDA 20 Percent Set-Aside funds in public/private partnerships with non-profit housing development corporations such as the NHDC and the SCHDC. Other potential sources for leveraging include HOME funds and Low-income Housing Tax Credits. Cily of Rencho Cucamonge Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2006 Annual Action Plan ACTIVITIES TO BE UNDERTAKEN · AFFORDABLE HOUSING OBJECTIVE 1: CONSERVATION OF THE EXISTING SINGLE-FAMILY AND MULTIPLE-FAMILY AFFORDABLE HOUSING STOCK. Program 1.1: Acquisition of existing multi-family units to be held for future affordable housing stock. Activity 1.1.1: This activity includes the acquisition of restricted, and previously unrestricted, at-risk units. The SCHDC, with pledge assistance from the RDA 20 Pement Set-Aside funds obtained replacement financing for several complexes within the City. The SCHDC owns and manages the complexes, and the RDA monitors the affordability covenants checking quarterly to ensure units am ranted according to the agreement and the occupants comply with established income categories. Lead Agency: The SCHDC, with funding assistance by the City of Rancho Cucamonga RDA. Geographic Location: Activities will primarily occur in the Redevelopment target ama, however, units may be acquired citywide. Resources: Bonds issued by the RDA and a loan from the Califomia Housing Finance Authority (CHFA) were used to provide long-term replacement financing for four SCHDC affordable housing complexes. A 1996-97 RDA tax allocation bond issue provided approximately $ 30 million for replacement financing. An annual pledge of $ 3.9 million of Agency Housing funds provides bond debt service and project reserve funds. Accomplishments and Time Frame: Them are currently five apartment complexes, containing 1,145 total units with 553 held as affordable. Monterey Village and Mountainside Apartments were acquired in FY 95-96 and Sycamore Springs and Rancho Verde Apartments were acquired in FY 96-97. During the 2002-2003 program year, SCHDC completed the Hedtage Pointe Senior Apartments, a 49 unit senior apartment complex, which holds 100% of the units affordable. The SCHDC is currently in negotiations on obtaining additional units and has a goal of obtaining approximately 200 units by June 30, 2006. Complex Total Units Affordable Units Sycamore Springs 240 96 Mountainside Apartments 384 192 Monterey Village Apartments 224 112 Rancho Verde Apartments 248 104 Heritage Pointe Senior Apartments 49 49 Total 1,145 553 Program t.2: Acquisition and rehabilitation of existing single-family homes. Activity 1.2.1: The NHDC anticipates rehabilitating one unit dudng the 2005-2006 program year. When rehabilitation does occur the NHDC is the Page 4 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2006 Annual Action Plan owneddeveloper of the rehabilitated lots, which are purchased with assistance from the RDA. This activity is part of the NHDC's First-Time Home Buyer program where newly constructed and/or rehabilitated single-family homes are available to Iow- and moderate-income home buyers in the Northtown neighborhood. (See Objective 4, Program 4.3, Activity 4.3.1.) OBJECTIVE 2: IMPROVE ACCESS TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOR'ALL LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS, WITH EMPHASIS ON THE PRODUCTION OF LARGER (3+ BEDROOM) RENTAL UNITS. Program 2.t: Construction of affordable (multi-family) units. Activity 2.t.1: To increase the availability of affordable rental stock, the RDA, in conjunction with local non-profit development agencies, will pursue new construction of affordable units in its existing target areas. Emphasis has been placed on construction of units available to large families. Under this activity, the NHDC is proposing the addition of six multi-family units at the Villa Del Norte apartment complex. Of these six units, three will be held for households with incomes below 50% of the area median and three units will be held for households below 80% of the area median. Lead Agency: The NHDC. Geographic Location: 8845 Ramona Avenue Resources: The estimated cost of the project is $1,200,000; the NH DC is seeking HOME Consortium assistance in the development of this project. Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2006, the development of six multi-family apartment units. Program 2.2: Construction of single-family infill development in Iow- and moderate-income neighborhoods.. Activity 2.2.1: The NHDC constructs new homes on infill lots within the Northtown target neighborhood. When lots are available, new homes are made available to families with incomes between 80% and 90% of the area median income. The NHDC is the owner/developer of the infill lots; however, these lots are purchased with assistance from the RDA. This program is also part of the NHDC's First-Time Home Buyer program where newly constructed and/or rehabilitated single-family homes are available to Iow- and moderate-income home buyers in the Northtown neighborhood. (See Objective 4, Program 4.3, Activity 4.3.1.). Lead Agency: The NHDC. Geographic Location: The Northtown target neighborhood. Page 5 City of Rancho Cucarnonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2006 Annual Aclion Plan Resources: The NHDC leveraged RDA 20 Percent Set-Aside funds with subsidies from the Affordable Housing Program and permanent first-mortgages from Home Loan Bank of San Francisco. Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2006, the development of five new single- family units. OBJECTIVE 3: PROVIDE DIRECT RENTER ASSISTANCE TO LOW- AND MODERATE- INCOME HOUSEHOLDS IN ORDER TO OBTAIN OR RETAIN PERMANENT HOUSING. Program 3.1: Support applications by the Housing Authority of San Bernardino County for future Section 8 and public housing assistance. Activity 3.'1 .'1: The Housing Authority routinely requests assistance from the City when applying for Section 8 Housing Certificates and Vouchers for public housing assistance. The City will continue to support these applications. The agency currently operates 6,257 Section 8 units of which 170 are located within the City. The agency also operates 16 public housing units and rents them to qualified households at affordable rates. Lead Agency: County of San Bemardino, Housing Authority. Geographic Location: These programs are available citywide. Resources: Federal housing funds. Accomplishments and Time Frame: Annually support 16 public housing and 170 Section 8 applications. Program 3.2: Participate in the HOME Consortium Tenant-Based Rental Assistance (TBRA) program. Activity 3.2.1: The Tenant-Based Rental Assistance (TBRA) program is offered through the HOME Consortium and is available to eligible residents. The program provides both a monthly rent subsidy for very Iow-income special needs households and security deposit assistance to households receiving a monthly rental subsidy from the San Bernardino County Housing Authority. The County targets monthly rental assistance to eligible households that include a disabled family member, and they place a priority on providing secudty deposit assistance to families experiencing "temporary" housing situations where the temporary housing or shelter is either not suitable or not available as permanent housing. Lead Agency: County of San Bernardino, ECD, HOME Consortium. Geographic Location: Available to eligible residents citywide. Resources: HOME funds are available on a first-come first-serve basis through the City's participation in the County HOME Consortium, with approximately $ '1,000,000 allocated to this program. This includes $ 400,000 in monthly rental assistance and $ 600,000 in security deposit City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant program 2005-2006 Annual Action Plan assistance. Accomplishments and Time Frame: The City will work with the HOME Consortium to publicize this program so that six households could receive assistance by June 30, 2006. OBJECTIVE 4: INCREASE HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES FOR LOW-AND MODERATE- INCOME HOME OWNERSHIP, PARTICULARLY THROUGH HOMEBUYER ASSISTANCE. Program 4.1: Administer a City sponsored Home Buyer Program. Activity 4.1.1: The RDA administers a Home Buyer program using down payment assistance loans. The loan is 10% of the purchase price up to a maximum of $ 80,000, which is forgiven if the buyer remains in the unit for 45 years. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga RDA. Geographic Location: This program is available to eligible residents citywide. Resources: RDA Set-Aside funds: $ 800,000. Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2006, assist 10 homebuyers. Program 4.2: Participate in the HOME Consortium Homeownership Assistance Program (HAP). Activity 4.2.1: The HAP assists households earning less than 80% of the median family income in the purchase of a home. The HAP is a silent second trust deed program to assist Iow-income persons in becoming homeowners. Lead Agency: County of San Bemardino, ECD, HOME Consortium. Geographic Location: This program is available to eligible residents citywide. Resources: HOME funds are available on a first-come first-serve basis through the City's participation in the County HOME Consortium, with approximately $1,000,000 allocated to this program. Accomplishments and Time Frame: The City will work with the HOME Consortium to publicize this program so that four households could receive assistance by June 30, 2006. Program 4.3: Assist the NHDC First-Time Home Buyer Program. Activity 4.3.t: The NHDC's First Time Home Buyer Program provides newly constructed and/or rehabilitated single-family homes to Iow- and moderate-income homebuyers in the Northtown neighborhood. NHDC plans to complete the construction of five new homes (see Affordable Housing, Objective 2, Program 2.2, Activity 2.2.1 ), as well as the rehabilitation of one home (see Affordable Housing, Objective 1, Program 1.2, Activity 1.2.1) to provide the homes available for this program. When lots are available, City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2006 Annual Action Plan newly constructed homes ara typically sold to income-eligible homebuyers earning between 80% and 90% of the araa median family income. When rahabilitated homes ara utilized (see Affordable Housing, Objective 1, Program 1.2, Activity 1.2.1 ) tt~e rahabilitated homes ara leased for a two-year period at affordable rants to families earning up to 60% of the area median family income. At the end of the two year lease pedod, the tenant will be offerad a purchase option if they have demonstrated the ability to propedy maintain and pay for the home and can arrange financing for an affordable first mortgage. The NHDC plans on the rahabilitation of one unit dudng the program year. Lead Agency: The NHDC. Geographic Location: The Northtown target neighborhood. Resources: The NHDC raceived a pledge amount from the RDA that they are able to use accordingly to meet the goals of their affordable housing program. Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2006, the sale or lease of six new and rahabilitated homes. OBJECTIVE 5: REHABILITATION OF THE EXISTING HOUSING STOCK WITH EMPHASIS ON OWNER-OCCUPIED HOUSING. Program 5.1: Provide moderate rehabilitation of owner occupied, single-family and mobile homes for extremely Iow-, Iow-, and moderate-income homeowners. Activity 5.t.1: The City has an existing moderate rehabilitation Home Improvement Program available to eligible owner-occupied households, those earning less than 80% of the araa median family income. The program offers deferred payment loans of up to $ 30,000 and grants of up to $ 7,500, including emergency rapair grants. The City runs this as a full service program and not only lends the money, but secures contractors, oversees the work, and maintains administration of the grants and loans rather than farming this work out to the bank or homeowner. While this method requires additional staff time, it is done to provide a high level of customer service and ensure both consistent and efficient rasults. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. Geographic Location: This program is available to eligible residents citywide. Resources: CDBG funds: $ 424, 513.00. (Includes $124,513 in revolving loan funds). Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2006, assist 40 households with incomes below 80% of the area median family income. Program 5.2: Participate in the HOME Consortium Rental Property Acquisition and Page B City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2006 Annual Action Plan Rehabilitation Program. Activity 5.2.1: This program provides a throe (3) percent interest loan to acquire and/or rohabilitate existing rontal property that will then be made available to qualifying tenants at affordable ronts for a specified period. Funds may be used for moderate rehabilitation efforts, with a maximum allowed of up to $ 25,000 per unit. The HOME assisted units will be subject to specific rent limits, and be available to Iow- and very-low income rosidents. This program also provides funding for the rofinancing and rehabilitation of multi-family units. Lead Agency: County of San Bernardino, ECD, HOME Consortium. Geographic Location: This program is available to eligible rosidents citywide. Resources: HOME funds are available on a first-come first-serve basis through the City's participation in the County HOME Consortium, with approximately $250,000 allocated to this program. Accomplishments and Time Frame: No known units aro proposed for assistance dudng the 2005-2006 program year. The City will work with the HOME Consortium to publicize this program in Rancho Cucamonga. Program 5.3: Participate in the HOME Consortium Multifamily Rental Property Rehabilitation/Refinance Program. Activity 5.3.1: Provides throe (3) percent interest loans to nonprofit and for-profit owners of affordable multifamily rental housing (five (5) or more units) primarily for the rohabilitation of their rosidential rontal property, which will then be made available to qualifying tenants at affordable rents for a specific pedod. Lead Agency: County of San Bernardino, ECD, HOME Consortium. Geographic Location: This program is available to eligible residents citywide. Resources: HOME funds are available on a first-come first-serve basis through the City's participation in the County HOME Consortium, with approximately $ 250,000 allocated to this program. Accomplishments and Time Frame: No known units are proposed for assistance during the 2005-2006 program year. The City will work with the HOME Consortium to publicize this program in'Rancho Cucamonga. OBJECTIVE 6: Program 6.1: IMPROVE LIVING CONDITIONS FOR LOW- AND MODERATE.INCOME HOUSEHOLDS. Support applications of the Housing Authority for their Annual Comprehensive Grant to improve living conditions for public housing residents. P~e9 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant program 2005-2006 Annual Action Plan Activity 6.1.1: Each year the City has certified consistency of the Housing Authority's Comprehensive Grant program with the Consolidated Plan. The City will continue to do so for the Comprehensive Plan. Lead Agency: Housing Authority of San Bernardino County. Geographic Location: This program will benefit residents citywide. Resources: Federal housing funds. Accomplishments and Time Frame: Annually support 16 public housing applications. · HOMELESS STRATEGIC PLAN OBJECTIVE 7: ASSIST HOMELESS INDIVIDUALS, FAMILIES, AND PERSONS WITH SPECIAL NEEDS, AND THOSE AT-RISK OF HOMELESSNESS. Program 7.t: Continue to support of local homeless facilities and services. Activity 7.1.1: The City supports a vadety of organizations that provide immediate assistance, advocacy, and short-term shelter to homeless individuals and families. The City will continue to address priority needs, and will continue to evaluate the provision of transitional shelter assistance. These agencies include: Foothill Family Shelter: Foothill Family Shelter operates a 90-day transitional shelter for homeless families with children. Support services are provided to enable families to obtain independence and permanent housing. They are located at 1501 West Ninth Street, Suite D, and at 230, 238, and 294 North San Antonio Avenue in Upland, CA 91786. House of Ruth: House of Ruth provides shelter, programs, education, and opportunities for safe, self-sufficient, healthy living for battered women and their children who are at-dsk of homelessness. Services provided include 24-hour emergency safe shelter for up to 30 days, 24- hour cdsis intervention hotline, 24-hour emergency transportation, outreach offices, and children programs. House of Ruth is located in Claremont, at P.O. Box 457, Claremont, CA 91711. Inland Valley Council of Churches - West End Hunqer Proqram (SOVA): SOVA offers a 5-day food supply (15 meals) for all members of a household. SOVA helps families maintain their health and avoid homelessness by providing emergency food assistance and support services. The PVCC offers the West End Hunger Program from offices located at 635 South Taylor Avenue, Ontado, CA 91761. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. Geographic Location: The benefits of this program occur citywide. Resources: CDBG funds: · Foothill Family Shelter: $ 5,000. · House of Ruth: $ 7,600. · SOVA: $ 7,000. Page 10 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2006 Annual Action Plan Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2006, assist the following: · Foothill Family Shelter- 10 families. · House of Ruth- 1,600 persons. · SOVA- 1,280 persons. · HOMELESS ANNUAL PLAN The City's goal is to develop a comprehensive homeless assistance plan that provides a continuum of care with the purpose of ultimately assisting individuals in obtaining and retaining permanent housing. As the first priodty in the plan, the City intends to continue funding those agencies that are able to provide the first line of defense in providing outreach and advocacy in assisting individuals and families who are homeless or at-dsk of homelessness. These activities include the support of emergency shelter, shelter vouchers, food distribution, advocacy, and referral services. The City will continue to fund landlord/tenant activities as a means of assisting those who are at-dsk of homelessness in keeping their homes. Additional assistance will be encouraged for those agencies that provide longer-term transitional shelter and assist in the transition to permanent housing opportunities. · SPECIAL NEEDS OBJECTIVE 8: PROVIDE NECESSARY REHABILITATION SERVICES TO SPECIAL NEEDS POPULATIONS WITH EMPHASIS ON ASSISTING THE ELDERLY AND FRAIL ELDERLY. Program 8.1: Provide minor and emergency rehabilitation services to eligible households with emphasis on assistance to Iow- and moderate- income seniors. Activity 8.1.1: This program will complement the City's Home Improvement Program by providing minor rehabilitation and emergency assistance to Iow- and moderate-income residents and senior citizen households whose income falls below 80% of the area median family income. Permitted home repairs include minor plumbing, electrical, carpentry, and roof repairs. Residents who are owner occupants are eligible to receive two visits, up to $ 250 per visit, and in emergencies, the allowance of a one-time material charge for up to $ 500. The agency is located at 8572 Sierra Avenue, Fontana, CA 92335. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. Geographic Location: This program is available to eligible residents citywide. Resources: CDBG funds: $10,000. Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2006, Oldtimers Foundation will assist 60 Iow- and moderate-income households. OBJECTIVE 9: SUPPORT SERVICE PROVIDERS ASSISTING SPECIAL NEEDS POPULATIONS. Page 11 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2006 Annual Action Plan Program 9.t: Support special need services in areas where there are significant under-served needs. Activity 9.1.1: Develop and enhance senior citizen classes and activities in the focus areas of physical fitness, recreational and educational development, mental health, and emotional well-being. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Services Department. Geographic Location: Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center, 9791 Arrow Route. Dudng the 2005-2006 program year, this activity will relocate to the new Senior Center facility located at the northwest corner of Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue. Resources: CDBG funds: $16,000. Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2006, to have assisted 550 persons through these activities. · SPECIAL NEEDS ANNUAL PLAN Objectives 8 and 9, as stated above, identify actions the City intends to take over the next program year to address the needs of persons who are not homeless, but have special needs. · NON-HOUSING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NEEDS OBJECTIVE 10: PROVIDE IMPROVEMENTS TO PUBLIC AREAS AND PUBLIC FACILITIES TO ENHANCE LIVING ENVIRONMENTS, IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF LIFE IN LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME NEIGHBORHOODS, AND FOR LOWER INCOME INDIVIDUALS, SENIORS, AND THE HANDICAPPED. Program 10.1: Complete all necessary infrastructure and sidewalk improvements in qualified target areas. Activity 10.1 .l: The City will fund the following public improvement projects: Sidewalk Grindin.q and Replacement in Identified Target Neighborhoods- Involves the grinding, repair, or replacement of sidewalks that are displaced and/or inaccessible. Northtown Area 1 Paving Rehabilitation: The design and construction of street oveday improvements. Includes Feron Street (between Archibald Avenue and Hermosa Avenue), Jersey Boulevard (between London Avenue to Ramona Avenue), London Avenue (north of Feron Boulevard), Pasito Avenue (north of Jersey Boulevard), Ramona Avenue (north of Feron Boulevard), Belmont Avenue (south of Eighth Street), Cottage Avenue (south of Eighth Street), Main Street (between Archibald Avenue and Ramona Avenue), Reid Street (between Feron Boulevard and Main Street), and Acacia Street (east of Archibald Avenue. Hellman/Arrow Drainaqe Improvements: The repair of existing under capacity drainage improvements, to increase capacity and allow for removal of debris, thereby reducing the' incidence of nuisance water in the street intersection. .25/ City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2006 Annual Action Plan Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Division. Geographic Location: Sidewalk Grinding efforts may be carried out in all eligible neighborhoods including CT 21, BG 2, 3, 6, & 7; and CT 20.07, BG 5. Northtown Area 1 Paving Rehabilitation efforts will be carried out in CT 21, BG 7. Hellman/Arrow Drainage Improvement efforts will be carried out in CT 21, BG 2. Resources: CDBG funds: e Sidewalk Grinding: $ 22,000. · Northtown Area 1 Paving $ 278,100. · Hellman Arrow Drainage Imp. $8,000. Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2006, replace approximately 3,960 square feet of sidewalk, and complete the Northtown Area 1 Paving Rehabilitation activity, and complete the Hellman/Arrow Drainage improvements. Program 10.3: Activity 10.3.1: Provide funding to support the implementation of a job center located in the southwest Cucamonga area. The job center assists Iow-income individuals by providing a safe and central place to seek employment opportunities and services such as English as a Second Language. The request includes leasing of the office trailer, preparation of the project site, utilities, and bathroom rentals. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga City Manager's Office; however, the job center will be operated in conjunction with a non-profit agency, such as Somebody Cares-Southland. GeograPhic Location: The job center trailer is located near the southeast comer of Grove Avenue and Arrow Route. Resources: CDBG funds: $ 25,000.00. (Includes $ 5,000 in CDBG funding is being reprogrammed from pdor year activity.) Accomplishments and Time Frame:' Through June 30, 2006, continue to support the job center activity. OBJECTIVE 11: Program 11.1: ASSIST LOCAL PUBLIC AND NON-PROFIT SERVICE AGENCIES THAT IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF LIFE FOR LOW-AND MODERATE- INCOME PERSONS AND THOSE WITH SPECIAL NEEDS. Assist public service agencies that support groups in the highest priority categories including: fair housing counseling, landlord- tenant mediation, homeless and food assistance, emergency shelters, domestic violence shelters, and senior, youth-at-risk, and literacy programs. Activity 11.1.t: The City will continue to fund public service agencies that include: Fair Housinq: Fair Housing services that include education, counseling, mediation, and legal Page 13 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2006 Annual Action Plan referral. Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board is located at 1005 Begonia Avenue, Ontado, CA 91762. Landlord Tenant Mediation: Landlord/Tenant dispute mediation services are provided by Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board. House of Ruth: House of Ruth provides shelter, programs, education, and opportunities for safe, self-sufficient, healthy living for battered women and their children who are at-dsk of homelessness. Services provided include 24-hour emergency safe shelter (up to 30 days), 24- hour cdsis intervention hotline, 24-hour emergency transportation, outreach offices, and children programs. House of Ruth is located in Claremont, at P.O. Box 457, Claremont, CA 91711. Inland Valley Council of Churches - West End Hunger Preqram (SOVA): SOVA offers a 5-day food supply (15 meals) for all members of a household. SOVA helps families maintain their health and avoid homelessness by providing emergency food assistance and support services. SOVA is located at 635 South Taylor Avenue, Ontario, CA 91761. YMCA - Your Own Club: This program is targeted to the Northtown neighborhood within CT 21, BG 6 & 7. YOC is designed to provide at-risk middle school aged youth with fun, educationally enriching and challenging value-based after school alternatives in a safe and enjoyable environment. Rancho Cucamonga Family YMCA, a branch of the West End YMCA, is currently located at 10970 Arrow Route, Suite 106, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. OIdtimers Foundation - Senior Nutrition: The nutrition program is run from the Senior Center in which 22,500 hot meals would be provided at the RC Senior Center and 16,250 meals prepared for home delivery. Oldtimers Foundation is located at 8572 Sierra Avenue, Fontana, CA 92335. Rancho Cucamonqa Public Library -.Back To Basics' The Back to Basic program trains volunteer tutors to work with 7 to 12-year old children identified by school personnel as at-dsk (challenged economically and educationally) and who are reading and writing below their grade levels. The Rancho Cucamonga Public Library is located at 7368 Archibald Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. YMCA - Senior Transportation: Provide senior citizens transportation to and from the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center, as well as local grocery shopping. The program is provided by Rancho Cucamonga Family YMCA, a branch of the West End YMCA. Camp Fire USA: The program provides a 5-day resident camp session to leam responsibility, develop skills, and gain confidence while building independence and self-reliance. The camp session is run at Camp Nawakwa, located in the Barton Flats recreation area of the San Bemardino Mountains. Camp Fire USA is located at 4959 Palo Verde Street, Suite 208C, Montclair, CA 91763. Prelect Sister: Project Sister provides sexual assault and violence prevention by working with teens addressing date rape, sexual harassment, and personal safety awareness, and working with seniors, who are vulnerable sexual assault, robbery, burglary, and financial exploitation. Project Sister is located at P.O. Box 1390, Claremont, CA 91711. Rancho Cucamonqa Community Services Department - Northtown Collaborative: The Northtown Collaborative is a community (youth and adult) prevention recreation/human services program provides essential human service programs as well as traditional recreational classes Page 14 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2006 Annual Action Plan and activities. The program is conducted through a joint use agreement with the Cucamonga Middle School and NHDC. The Community Services Department is located at Rancho Cucamonga City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. Hope Throuqh Housing Foundation: Hope Through Housing provides opportunities in career development, education, and jobs, by empowering participants with current technology. Hope's parent organization is SCHDC, which operates the apartment complexes identified in Activity 1.1.1. The program will focus on the residents of Rancho Verde Village, Monterey Village, Sycamore Springs, Mountainside Apartments, and their surrounding neighborhoods. Hope Through Housing will operate out of Rancho Verde Village apartments, 8837 Grove Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. Risin.q Stars of Equestrian Therapy {RSET): Provides therapeutic, recreational, and instructional horse riding to persons of all ages, with the primary emphasis on those with physical and mental disabilities. The program includes therapeutic exercise, development of fine motor skills, auditory commands, and equine husbandry. RSET is located at 8401 Bella Vista, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. Geographic Location: The benefits of this program occur citywide. Resources: CDBG funds: · Fair Housing: $12,000. · Landlord/Tenant Mediation: $10,000. · House of Ruth: $ 7,600. · SOVA: $ 7,000. · YMCA-YOC: $ 5,000. · Senior Nutrition: $ 8,500. · BackTo Basics: $10,000. · YMCA- Senior Transportation: $15,000. · Camp Fire USA: $ 6,700. · Project Sister: $ 9,700. · Northtown Collaborative $16,000. · Hope Through Housing $ 5,000. · RSET $ 3,000. Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2006, assist the following: · Fair Housing- 388 persons. · Landlord/Tenant- 228 households. · House of Ruth - 1,600 persons. · SOVA- 1,258 persons. · YMCA- YOC - 40 youth. · Senior Nutrition - 570 seniors. · Back To Basics - 132 persons. · YMCA- Senior Transportation - 3,700 seniors. · Camp Fire USA- 20 youth. · Project Sister- 980 persons. · Northtown Collaborative - 3,200 persons. Page 15 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Developmenl Block Grant P~ograrn 2005-2006 Annual Action Plan · Hope Through Housing- 145 persons; · RSET-40 persons. OBJECTIVE 12: Program 12.1: Activity 12.1.1: ENSURE ACCESSIBILITY TO ALL PUBLIC FACIL T ES AND STRUCTURES. Installation of handicap wheelchair ramps at all curb returns. This program involves the retrofitting of existing curbs to accommodate disabled individuals. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Division. Geographic Location: The benefits of this program occur citywide. Resources: CDBG funds: $ 22,000. Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2006, provide approximately 2,880 square feet of curbing for handicap ramps. OBJECTIVE 13: THE RESTORATION AND PRESERVATION OF PROPERTIES OF SOCIAL VALUE FOR HISTORIC, ARCHITECTURAL, AND AESTHETIC REASONS. Program 13.1: The rehabilitation of significant historic structures, with primary emphasis on residential assistance. Activity 13.1.1: The preservation and histodc restoration of the Etiwanda Railway Station. The mission of this activity is to preserve the station through renovation for adaptive rouse as a museum and trailhead for the Pacific Electdc Inland Trail, a 21-mile long regional trail. It is anticipated that this activity will be a multi-year program, requiring additional CDBG funds in future program years. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. Geographic Location: The Etiwanda Railway Station is located at 7089 Etiwanda Avenue. Resources: CDBG funds: $ 58,088. (Includes $10,000 in CDBG funding is being reprogrammed from prior year activity.) Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2006, assist in the preparation of design studies, planning and administrative activities, and construction activities for the restoration and preservation of this historic property. Activity 13.t.2: The preservation and historic restoration of the Chaffey-lsle House and the Norton-Fisher House. Chaffey-lsle House: Proposed activities will include selective demolition and modifications to secure the structure from the environment and halt the physical effects of deterioration on the structure's exterior. Histodc Page 16 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2006 Annual Action Plan restoration will include: rehabilitation, framing, repairing extedor siding, painting, dry walling, plumbing, and electrical. This is a multi-year program and will be completed through a cooperative effort between the City and the Etiwanda Historical Society. Norton-Fisher House: Proposed activities may include selective demolition and exterior modifications to protect the structure from the environment and stop the physical effects of decay. Historic restoration will include: rehabilitation, framing, repairing exterior siding, painting, dry walling, plumbing, and electrical. This is a multi-year program and will be completed through a cooperative effort between the City and the Etiwanda Historical Society. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. Geographic Location: The Chaffey-lsle House is located at 7086 Etiwanda Avenue and the Norton Fisher House is located at 7165 Etiwanda Avenue. Resources: CDBG funds: $ 40,000. (Includes $10,000 in CDBG funding is being reprogrammed from prior year activity.) Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2006, complete rehabilitation and preservation efforts at both the Chaffey-lsle House and the Norton-Fisher House. OBJECTIVE 14: PROVIDE THE NECESSARY PLANNING AND ADMINISTRATIVE CAPACITY TO IMPLEMENT THE CDBG PROGRAM AND THE CONSOLIDATED PLAN. Program 14.1: Provide for the necessary planning and administrative activities of the CDBG program. Activity 14.1.1: Includes administration of the CDBG program, the completion of program applications and performance reports, research and analysis, target area studies, historic preservation evaluations, and housing documents. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. Geographic Location: The benefits of this program occur citywide. Resources: CDBG funds: $ 226,920. Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2006, complete all administrative and program management oversight to ensure efficient and effective use of CDBG funds. Page 17 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2006 Annual Action Plan OBJECTIVE 15: ALLEVIATE PHYSICAL AND RELATED ECONOMIC DISTRESS THROUGH THE STIMULATION OF PRIVATE INVESTMENT AND COMMUNITY REVITALIZATION IN IDENTIFIED TARGET NEIGHBORHOODS. Program 15.t: Support housing and Community Development activities that stimulate economic development. Activity 15.1.t: Review and evaluation of Foothill Boulevard. Foothill Boulevard, west of Haven Avenue is older with mixed uses and appears to be reaching stages of economic distress, while the area east of Haven Avenue has primarily new development and vacant land. The concern is with revitalization of the older areas and planning 'land use to ensure effective and balanced growth along Foothill Boulevard. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. Geographic Location: Approximately six miles from Grove Avenue to East Avenue. Resources: City General Fund. Accomplishments and Time Frame: On January 16, 2002, the City Council adopted the Foothill Boulevard/Historic Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan. The City's Foothill Boulevard and Economic Task Force reviewed existing Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan policies and developed standards for softscape improvements that will occur within the street fight-of-way. These improvements will include signage, street furniture, landscaping, etc, to establish a unified street theme. The Visual Improvement Plan will be implemented by private development as vacant properties fronting along Foothill Boulevard develop, and through public improvements where the street frontage is currently improved. The purpose of the Visual Improvement Plan is to develop a design specification plan that will set forth design concepts for the streetscape improvements within the public rights-of-way and entry areas along the entire length of Foothill Boulevard. The plan will help guide a balanced and unified pattern of streetscape for both public and private development. By drawing upon the existing positive improvements and developing a set of unique and unifying historic elements, this plan will ensure that Foothill Boulevard will be an exciting reflection of the histodc Route 66 as well as a historic Rancho Cucamonga. A variety of improvements have been installed along Foothill Boulevard, in the vicinity of the Victoda Gardens mall; however, much of the Visual Improvement Plan has not yet been implemented. Through June 30, 2006, continue analysis and implementation of the Foothill Boulevard/Historic Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan. Page 18 City of Rancho Cucarnonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2006 Annual Action Plan OBJECTIVE 16: REVITALIZE AND UPGRADE HOUSING CONDITIONS; PREVENT AND ELIMINATE BLIGHT AND BLIGHTING INFLUENCES; AND ELIMINATE CONDITIONS DETRIMENTAL TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, AND WELFARE. Program 16.t: Continue improvements to residential energy efficiency, lead-based paint hazard reduction, and code enforcement through the City's Home Improvement Program. Activity 16.1.1: The City currently funds a Home Improvement Program in which, through the course of that activity, the rehabilitation improvements mentioned previously would be completed. A separate activity will not be developed. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. Geographic Location: The benefits of this program occur citywide. Resources: CDBG funds. Accomplishments and Time Frame: Activity accomplishments occur through the Home Improvement Program. (See Objective 5, Program 5.1, Activity 5.1.1.). Program t6.2: Continue funding the Graffiti Removal Program. Activity 16.2.1: City crews oPerate in lower income target neighborhoods to remove incidents of graffiti. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Division. Geographic Location: Available in all eligible target neighborhoods including CT 21, BG 2, 3, 6, & 7; and CT 20.07, BG 5. Resources: CDBG funds: $22,000. Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2006, remove approximately 15,000 square feet of graffit OTHER ACTIONS · ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT The RDA Implementation Plan includes a section on "Commercial and Industrial Economic Enhancement Programs." The objective of that program is to strengthen the economic environment of the commercial/Industrial sector of the Redevelopment Project Area. This is accomplished through a variety of programs designed to address the needs of Rancho Cucamonga's existing businesses, to attract new businesses to the City, and provide long-term employment to strengthen and compliment the economy of the City. Economic development goals focus on job creation, improving the quality of life to residents and businesses, increasing the City's tax base, and providing opportunities for public and private partnerships, including private investment in the community. Economic development Page 19 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005J2006 Annual Action Plan activities focus on two basic efforts: business retention and business attraction. Currently, the RDA has successfully implemented a vadety of marketing and promotion strategies suggested in the strategic plan that have leveraged the community's attributes as well as establishing a positive business related image. Through a comprehensive plan of advertisement campaigns, direct mail of newsletters, site selection information, trade shows, publishing editorials, press releases, and Intemet web page, the City has managed to receive local, regional, and even national recognition. Despite this success and recognition, the RDA continues to work to attract businesses that fit the general business environment of the City and achieve a greater presence in the area. The City will continue with these economic development efforts during the 2005- 2006 program year. The RDA's marketing and promotion efforts have significantly affected employment, expansion, and the local tax base. From 1.9.94-2001, more that 80 companies expanded and/or relocated creating more than 5,300 new jobs because of the Agency's marketing and promotion efforts. Although the City's success in economic development is not a direct result of the Agency's marketing and promotional efforts, the Agency has managed to facilitate that growth. Apart from the specifics of the Economic Development strategy, the Agency assists companies through participation in the following programs. The Inland Empire Small Business Development Center (SBDC), which offers a variety of resources to improve business operation including, business consulting, seminars and workshops, information resources, procurement assistance, environmental assistance, and a variety of other programs. The results of the SBDC during the past year were outstanding. Over 179 local businesses were assisted, 244 new jobs were created, and many other jobs have been retained. The SBDC has also assisted in secudng $1.5 million in new financing for small businesses. · AFFIRMATIVELY FURTHERING FAIR HOUSING In 1984, the City began contracting with the inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board (IFHMB) to provide for the education and enforcement of state and federal housing laws for all residents who request assistance. The IFHMB provides public education, mediation, counseling, testing, and legal referral services to promote fair housing. Having the IFHMB administer the Fair Housing Program assures that there are no impediments to fait housing choices. Fair Housing education is provided as a major component of the program with a goal of providing the knowledge of what is Fair Housing to all partners of the housing industry. Fair Housing outreach is provided through radio programming, mass media, brochures, and the IFHMB web site (http://hometown.aol.com/inmedbd/index.html), Enfomement is provided through the process of mediation through the IFHMB, or a related enfomement agency. And finally, Fair Housing testing is used as a tool to gather evidence of discrimination. The Fair Housing program attempts to accomplish the primary objectives of the City's Fair Housing Impediments Analysis by providing for the education, counseling, mediation, testing, and legal referral of Fair Housing issues within the community. In May 1996, the City completed a five-year Fair Housing Analysis of Impediments. Dudng the 2001-2002 program year the City contracted with Cotton/Bridges/Associates to prepare an update to the Analysis of Impediments. The update was be completed by adopted by the City Council on December 4, 2002. While the Al identifies a number of potential issues, certain issues are beyond the ability of a local jurisdiction to address, such as those related to lending practices. The actions identified below represent those that can be feasibly addressed by the City. Page 20 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Pragrarn 2005-2006 Annual Action Plan ExpandinR Affordable Housin.q Opportunities Housing affordability alone is not necessarily a fair housing issue. However, when housing affordability issues interact with other factors covered under the fair housing laws, such as household type, composition, and race/ethnicity, fair housing concems may arise. Moreover, the fair housing equation has two sides. One the one side is the availability of a range of housing choices and on the other side is equal access to those choices. Therefore, a community must ensure that it has a range of housing choices to meet the various needs of all income segments in the community. Action 1: The City will continue to provide homeownership opportunities in the community by promoting the First-Time Homebuyer Program. The City will focus outreach efforts towards lower income households, particularly to Black, Hispanic, and Asian households, since they have more difficulty obtaining financing. Specifically the City will provide advertisements and workshops in both Spanish and English to inform residents about this program. Time Frame: Ongoing. Action 2: The City will continue to facilitate the development of housing for all income groups within the community. The City will focus on facilitating affordable housing development through a combination of financial and regulatory assistance. Specifically, the City will work to provide affordable housing throughout the community, avoiding an over- impaction of specific neighborhoods. Time Frame: Ongoing. Action 3: The City will develop a monitoring system of the RDA's lending practices for the First Time Homebuyer Program, as this program is not subject to HMDA. Time Frame: By 2004. Rehabilitation Assistance Action 4: The City will continue to provide rehabilitation assistance for owner-occupied and investor-owned single-family housing in the community. Existing programs include the Home Improvement Grant, Deferred Payment Loan Program, and the Emergency Home Improvement Grant. The City will ensure that information about these programs be provided in the City's brochures, advertisements, and website in both English and Spanish. Time Frame: Ongoing. Action 5: The City will ensure that Spanish speaking staff is available to assist residents in the City regarding code enforcement, housing rehabilitation, and other housing services. Time Frame: Ongoing. Action 6: The City will continue to rehabilitate substandard multi-family housing in the community. Page 21 City of Rancho Cucamonga ' Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2006 Annual Action Plan Time Frame: Ongoing. Access to Information Action 7: The City will work to expand its website to provide additional links to housing services and resources, such as a link to the fair housing service provider and a link to the Fannie Mae Foundation which offers free guides and resources for first-time home buyers in both English and Spanish. Time Frame: By 2004. Public Policies and Programs Action 8: The City will provide developers with federal fair housing guide information regarding accessibility requirements as part of the land use entitlement process. In addition, the City may consider incorporating accessibility compliance as part of the entitlement process. Time Frame: By 2004. Action 9: The City will continue to pursue affordable housing development programs identified in the 2000-2004 Housing Element. To the extent feasible, the City will facilitate the development of housing affordable to lower and moderate-income households according to the Regional Housing Needs Allocation identified in the Housing Element. Time Frame: By 2004. Outreach to Lenders Action 10: The City will work with local lenders and government institutions to provide outreach to lower income residents about government-backed financing. The City will encourage local lenders to provide information in both English and Spanish. Time Frame: Ongoing. Action 1 '1: The City will encourage lenders, particularly local lenders, to hold home buying workshops in Rancho Cucamonga by local lending institutions. These workshops should be held in both English and Spanish. Time Frame: Workshops will be conducted on an annual basis. Action 12: The City will explore regional effort to study predatory lending issues and support state and federal initiatives to address predatory lending practices. Time Frame: Discuss with the fair housing service provider a regional study of predatory/ending in 2002 and ongoing support of anti-predatory lending initiatives. Fair Housin.q Services Page 22 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2006 Annual Action Plan Action 13: The fair housing service provider will continue to conduct fair housing workshops for residents, apartment owners, and property managers. The City will encourage the fair housing service provider to coordinate with the real estate associations regarding fair housing training. Time Frame: Provide training at least once a year. HMDA Monitorin~ Action 14: The fair housing service provider will monitor complaints regarding unfair lending, and assess lending patterns using the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act Data (HMDA) and other data sources. Time Frame: Monitor HMDA and other data on an annual basis. Action t5: The City will work with the fair housing service provider to ensure that an increased number of fair housing tests be performed in the City. Time Frame: Testing to be conducted periodically. · OBSTACLES TO MEETING UNDER-SERVED NEEDS The pdmary obstacle identified toward meeting under-served needs is a lack of available resources. This obstacle is and will continue to be an issue. The best way to address this matter is to combine efforts and resources and tap new funding sources. The City is striving to form public/private partnerships as well as seeking out new sources of funding, such as HOME funds to better leverage available funding. · ACTIONS TO FOSTER AND MAINTAIN AFFORDABLE HOUSING A majodty of the objectives and actions identified as part of this Annual Action Plan are specifically aimed at increasing and maintaining the City's existing affordable housing stock. Activities such as new construction, conservation of at-risk units, and preservation of existing units are all stdving to increase the affordable housing stock. · ACTIONS TO REMOVE BARRIERS TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING There were no significant barriers to affordable housing identified that would need to be revised or amended. All regulations and policies currently in-place are necessary in order to maintain the public health, safety, and welfare. Page 23 City of Rancho Cucarnonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2006 Annual Action Plan · ACTIONS TO EVALUATE AND REDUCE LEAD-BASED PAINT HAZARDS In conjunction with the Home Improvement Program, the City will continue to implement federal requirements concerning lead-based paint reductions. HUD requires that for any program utilizing CDBG funds, all owners, and/or tenants be notified in wdting about the dangers of lead-based paint. Units constructed prior to 1978, which are occupied by children under the age of seven, are inspected for defective paint surfaces. If a child residing in the home has an elevated blood lead level, then defective chewable surfaces will be treated and lead abated. It is also recommended that housing rehabilitation efforts carried out by the RDA also follow the same guidelines. · ACTIONS TO REDUCE THE NUMBER OF POVERTY LEVEL FAMILIES The City has relatively little control over the many factors that may affect the determination of an individual's income level. The primary activify that may be utilized bythe City is the support of public service agencies that incorporate job training and life development skills into their programs, which includes most of the agencies currently receiving CDBG funding. Most of the activities funded by the City, particularly those related to non-housing community development, act indirectly to increase economic development in the City. The City, through its CDBG contract activities, complies with Section 3 requirements encouraging the employment of local Iow-income individuals. From a housing perspective, all of the priorities, objectives, and programs aimed at increasing affordable housing also increase the stock of housing available to those in the lowest income categories. · ACTIONS TO DEVELOP INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURE AND ENHANCE COORDINATION The Consolidated Plan evaluated gaps in the institutional structure and actions that might be taken to strengthen the system. It was determined that one main action that can be taken toward this is increasing expertise of staff and City Council, which in turn will increase the CDBG program efficiency and effectiveness. Increased contact and coordination among City departments will also contribute to the CDBG program's effectiveness. The City will continue to encourage direct contact between itself and the Public Housing Agency and other service providers operating in the region. Most of the coordination efforts in the west end are tied to funding resources and the type of service provided. · PUBLIC HOUSING IMPROVEMENTS Each year the City reviews the Annual Comprehensive Grant application submitted by the Housing Authority whereby the City must certify consistency of the activities with the goals and objectives of the Consolidated Plan. · MONITORING Monitoring serves as an effective tool to ensure that federal funds are spent in a manner consistent with the CDBG National Objectives and that the programs and projects are achieving stated goals. The following outlines basic monitoring requirements that are followed in the implementation of the CDBG program. Page 24 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2006 Annual Action Plan Standards Utilized for Review · Is the program meeting intended objectives? · Is the agency capable of tracking and/or documenting necessary benefit information and carrying out the responsibilities of its program consistent with federal requirements? · Is appropriate and accurate documentation submitted in a timely manner? Monitodnq Procedures Construction Projects -All construction projects ara expected to comply with federal labor and procurement procedures as well as the vadous affirmative action and equal opportunity requirements required by various federal and state laws. To ensure this end, CDBG staff developed a Procurement and Contract Compliance Manual that outlines the various procedures and steps required as part of contract management. The CDBG coordinator oversees and reviews contract preparation at each step from bid preparation, contract document preparation, pre-construction meetings, and ongoing project inspections. SubrecipientAgencies - All Subrecipient agencies must sign a contract with the City in which the vadous scope of work, time line, and documentation requirements are outlined. On a monthly basis, each Subrecipient must submit detailed information regarding the number, ethnicity, and income level of individuals benefiting with CDBG funds. Quarterly summary reports are required of some agencies in which further information is provided on activities accomplished in that quarter. The City's monitoring goal is to conduct an on-site inspection of each agency at least once a year, preferably toward the end of the funding cycle. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION The preparation ora representative and useful Annual Action Plan is the result of an effective citizen participation process. The City of Rancho Cucamonga encourages and solicits the participation of its residents in accordance with the provisions of its Citizen Participation Plan. The following steps were taken to ensure adequate public participation. A public notice of available funds and soliciting project applications was published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin on November 8, 2004. Copies of the notice were also posted at City Hall and mailed to approximately 50 individuals and organizations. Notice regarding the 30-day review pedod and availability of the draft 2005-2006 Annual Action Plan and notice of the public hearing was published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin on April 5, 2005. Letters providing notice of the public headng and indicating documents availability were mailed to surrounding jurisdictions, the County of San Bemardino, and the Housing Authority of San Bernardino County. Copies of the notice were posted at City HalF, Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center, Lion's Park Community Center, and the Rancho Cucamonga Public Library. The public hearing was held on Apdl 20, 2005. Page 25 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2006 Annual Action Plan APPENDIX "A" - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2005-2006 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN · PURPOSE OF THE CONSOLIDATED PLAN The Consolidated Plan is a comprehensive 5-year strategy that addresses the use of federal grant, entitlement funds, such as CDBG funds to meet the goal of providing decent housing, a suitable living environment, and expanded economic opportunities principally for persons of Iow- and moderate-income. · PURPOSE OF THE ANNUAL ACTION PLAN The Annual Action Plan identifies specific projects consistent with the Consolidated Plan 5-year strategy listing the projects, programs, and resources that will be utilized dudng the program year. Dudng the 2005-2006 program year, the City will receive an entitlement allocation of $1,t34,608, which is $ 45,392 less than fiscal year 2004-2005. CDBG funds reprogrammed from pdor year activities are $149,513.00, which provides $1,284,121.00 available for funding program activities. These funds will be used to support the following housing and community development activities. $ o.00 / $226,92o.oo / $ 225,920.00 Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Dept, Sidewalk Gdnding Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Dept. $ 0.00 $22,000.00 $ 22,000.00 Wheelchair Ramps Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Dept. $ 0.00 $ 22,000.00 $ 22,000.00 Etiwanda Railway Station Rancho Cucamonga Planning Dept. $10,000.00 $ 48,088.00 $ 58,088.00 Job Center Rancho Cucamonga $ 5,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 25,000.00 Chaffey Isle/Norton-Fisher Rancho Cucamonga Planning Dept. $10,000.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 40,000.00 Northtown Area 1 Paving Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Dept. $ 0.00 $ 278,100.00 $ 278,100.00 HellmaNArrow Drainage $ 0.00 $25,000.00 $ 8,000.00 $428,188.00 $ 8,000.00 $453,t88.00 $ t2~513. $ 0.00 $ 300,000.00 $10,000.00 $310,000.00 $ 424,513.00 $10,000.00 $434,5t3.00 Graffiti Removal Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Division $ 0.00 $ 22,000.00 $ 22,000.00 Fair Housing Inland Mediation Board $ 0.00 $12,000.00 $'12,000.00 Landlord/Tenant Inland Mediation Board $ 0.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 Emergency Shelter Foothill Family Shelter $ 0.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 Emergency Shelter House of Ruth $ 0.00 $ 7,600.00 $ 7,600.00 Food DisbibutJon SOVA $ 0.00 $ 7,000.00 $ 7,000.00 Youth Activity YMCA - Your Own Club $ 0.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 Page A- 1 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2006 Annual Action Plan P~OJ~gt T ~J !~ ;i'~pleme~tln9 ~gency ~ ~~ Prior ¥~ar / ~ 200~2006 ~l AVallabl~ Senior Transpo~flon / West End YMCA $ 0.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 Senior Programs ~ Ran~o Cu~monga Communi~ Se~i~s $ 0.00 $16,000.00 I $16,000.00 Human Se~i~s/Re~ea~on ~ No.town Collabom~ve $ 0.00 $12,000.00 $12,000.00 Litem~ ~ Ran~o Cu~monga Public Libm~ $ 0.00 $10,000.00 $ t0,000.00 Food DistflbuUon ~ OIdfimem FoundaUon $ 0.00 $ 8,500.00 $ 8.500.00 You~ A~ivi~ ~ Camp Fire USA $ 0.00 $ 6,700.00 $ 6,700.00 SexuaJ ~sault ~sis~n~ ~ Pmje~ Sister $ 0.00 $ 9,700.00 $ 9,700.00 Career/Eduction/Jobs ~ Hope Through Housing FoundaUon $ 0.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 Human Se~ices/Recreafion J Rising S~m of Eques~an ~erapy $ 0.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 E~rg~ ~~ Pr~e~ Di~ $0.00 $ t5,000.00 $ ~ 5,000.00 ~ i ~ s ~4~,s~3.0~ s ~,~,sos.o~ S ~,2~,~2~.0~ Page A-2 City of Ranche Cucarnonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2006 Annual Action Plan APPENDIX "B" - SUMMARY OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING 5-YEAR AND I-YEAR GOALS * These figures are not cumulative, but represent the number of units operated by the Housing Authority dudng the program year. HOUSING AFFORDABILITY OBJECTIVE 1: Program 1.1: Program t .2: CONSERVATION OF THE EXISTING SINGLE-FAMILY AND MULTIPLE-FAMILY AFFORDABLE HOUSING STOCK. Acquisition of existing multiple-family units to be held for future affordable housing. Acquisition and rehabilitation of existing single-family homes. OBJECTIVE 2: Program 2.1.' Program 2.2: IMPROVE ACCESS TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOR ALL LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS, WITH EMPHASIS ON THE PRODUCTION OF LARGER (3+ BEDROOM) RENTAL UNITS. Construction of affordable multi-family units. Construction of single-family infill development in Iow- and moderate- income neighborhoods. OBJECTIVE 3: Program 3.t: Program 3,.2: PROVIDE DIRECT RENTER ASSISTANCE TO LOW. AND MODERATE. INCOME HOUSEHOLDS IN ORDER TO OBTAIN OR RETAIN PERMANENT HOUSING. Support applications by the Housing Authority of San Bemardino County for Section 8 and public housing assistance. Participate in the County HOME Consortium Tenant Based Assistance (TBA) program. OBJECTIVE 4: Program 4.t: Program 4.2: INCREASE HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES FOR LOW-AND MODERATE- INCOME HOME OWNERSHIP, PARTICULARLY THROUGH HOMEBUYER ASSISTANCE. Administer a City sponsored Home Buyer Program. Participate in the County HOME Consortium Homeownership Assistance Program (HAP) for eligible first-time homebuyers. Page B- 1 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2006 Annual Ac§on Plan Program 4.3: OBJECTIVE 5: Program 5.1: Program 5.2: OBJECTIVE 6: Program 6.1: NHDC First-Time Home Buyer program. REHABILITATION OF THE EXISTING HOUSING STOCK WITH EMPHASIS ON OWNER-OCCUPIED HOUSING. Provide moderate rehabilitation of owner occupied, single-family and mobile homes for extremely Iow-, Iow-, and moderate-income homeowners. Participate in the County HOME Consortium Rental Rehabilitation Program. IMPROVE LIVING CONDITIONS FOR LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS. Support applications of the Housing Authority for their annual Comprehensive Grant to improve living conditions for public housing residents. Page B-2 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2005-2006 Annual Action Plan APPENDIX "C" - ATTACHMENTS SUPPORTING MAPS: PROPOSED PROJECTS, POINTS OF INTEREST, LoW-MOD INCOME, ETHNICITY, AND UNEMPLOYMENT SUPPORTING FORMS: FUNDING SOURCES, CONTINUUM OF CARE GAPS ANALYSIS, SPECIAL NEEDS/NON-HOMELESS, HOUSING NEEDS, AND COMMUNITY NEEDS LISTING OF PROPOSED PROJECTS CERTIFICATIONS Page C- 1 C H 0 CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT StaffR : ort DATE: April 20, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: SUBJECT: Betty Miller, Associate Engineer CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY FOR THE ACQUISITION IN EMINENT DOMAIN OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS TO AND WIDENING OF BASE LINE ROAD ACROSS A PORTION OF APN 1100-011-02 RECOMMENDATION That the City Council 1. Consider Resolution No. 05-094, a Resolution of Necessity of the City of Rancho Cucamonga declaring certain real property necessary for public purposes and authorizing the acquisition thereof in connection with the proposed improvements to and widening of Base Line Road. 2. Open and conduct a hearing on the adoption of the proposed Resolution of Necessity, receive from staff the evidence stated and referred to in this Report, take testimony from any person wishing to.be heard on issues A, B, C and D, below, and consider all the evidence to determine whether to adopt the proposed Resolution, which requires a unanimous or 4/5ths vote. 3. If the City Council finds, based upon the evidence contained in and referred to in this Report, and the testimony and comments received in this hearing, that the evidence warrants the necessary findings with respect to the Resolution of Necessity, then the staff recommends that the City Council, in the exercise of its discretion, adopt the proposed Resolution No. 05-094 (which requires a 4/5ths vote of the entire Council) and authorize City staff and the City Attorney's office to take all necessary steps to file and CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT APRIL 20, 2005 Page 2 prosecute an eminent domain proceeding to acquire certain real property interests in portions of the real property commonly known as 13025 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, and identified as Assessor's Parcel Number 1100-011-02 (referred to hereafter as "Subject Property Interests"). The Subject Property Interests are more fully described in the legal description attached as Exhibit "A" and depicted on the diagram attached as Exhibit "B" to the Resolution of Necessity. Exhibits "A" and "B" are incorporated herein by this reference. RESOLUTION NO. 05-094 A RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES AND AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION THEREOF, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS TO AND WIDENING OF BASE LINE ROAD (PORTIONS OF ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 1100-011-02) BACKGROUND Resolution No. 05-094 seeks to acquire by eminent domain an approximate 0.127-acre (approximately 5,544 square foot) permanent street easement on the real property commonly known as 13025 Base Line Road, and identified as Assessor's Parcel Number 1100-011-02. The Subject Property Interests are sought for public purposes, namely for street purposes and all uses necessary or convenient thereto in connection with the proposed improvements to and widening of Base Line Road ("proposed Project") pursuant to California Constitution Article 1, Section 19, California Government Code Sections 37350, 37350.5, 37351, 40401 and 40404 and California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1230.010 et seq., including but not limited to Sections 1240.010 through 1240.050, 1240.110, 1240.120, 1240.410, 1240.510, 1240.610, 1240.650, and other provisions of law. As explained more fully below, the street improvements comprising the proposed Project were a condition of approval of Tentative Tract Map No. SUBTT16454. The street improvements are consistent with and are a proposed component of the City's General Plan. The street improvements comprising the proposed Project are also consistent with the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The proposed Project would require the acquisition of the Subject Property Interests for a permanent street easement. The legal description of the Subject Property Interests is attached as Exhibit "A" to the Resolution of Necessity and depicted on Exhibit "B" to the Resolution of Necessity. The proposed Resolution of Necessity, Resolution No. 05-094, together with its Exhibits "A" and "B" is attached to this Staff Report, and is incorporated herein by this reference. The hearing on the proposed Resolution of Necessity has been duly noticed. 11231.0141/812417.1 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT APRIL 20, 2005 Page 3 The City has extended an offer pursuant to the requirements of Government Code section 7262, et seq. to the owners of record, but no negotiated sale has been reached. Based on the timing of the proposed Project, it is necessary that the City Council consider at this time the adoption of the Resolution of Necessity for the acquisition of the Subject Property Interests by eminent domain. In order to adopt the Resolution of Necessity the City Council must find and determine that: A. The public interest and necessity require the Project. The Project is planned or located in the manner that will be compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury. The Subject Property Interests described in the Resolution of Necessity are necessary for the Project. The City has made the offer required by Government Code Section 7267.2 to the owners of record of the property the City seeks to acquire This hearing relates to Issues A, B, C, and D above. The amount of just compensation is not an issue before the City Council at this hearing. DISCUSSION The proposed acquisition consists of the partial acquisition of the real property commonly known as 13025 Base Line Road, and identified as Assessor's Parcel Number 1100-011-02 for an approximate 0.127-acre (5,544 square foot) permanent street easement in connection with the City's proposed improvements to and widening of Base Line Road. As explained more fully below, the street improvements comprising the proposed Project were a condition of approval on Tentative Tract Map No. SUBTT16454 ("Tentative Tract Map"). These street improvements are consistent with and are a proposed component of the City's General Plan. The improvements to and widening of Base Line Road are consistent with the City's designation of Base Line Road as a "major divided arterial" in the Circulation Element of the General Plan. For example, the proposed Project would improve and widen Base Line Road in the area of the Tentative Tract Map development project in accordance with the City's "major divided arterial" standards and Etiwanda Specific Plan Figure 5-21. The Base Line Road frontage improvements making up the proposed Project consist of the following: (1) protecting existing curb and gutter and sidewalk, or repairing same, as required; (2) providing curb, gutter, curvilinear sidewalk and asphalt pavement as required; (3) providing a landscaped median on Base Line Road to the easterly limits of the Tentative Tract Map 11231.0141/812417.1 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT APRIL 20, 2005 Page 4 development project and protecting and reconstructing the existing median in Base Line Road as needed to relocate the median break from Emmett Way to Shelby Place (formerly known as Street "A"); (4) providing 9500 Lumen HPSV streetlights along the Base Line Road frontage; (5) providing a bus bay at the southeast corner of Base Line Road and Etiwanda Avenue; (6) protecting existing R26 "No Stopping" signs, or replacing same, as required; (7) protecting traffic signal equipment at Base Line Road and Etiwanda Avenue, or relocating or replacing same, as required; (8) providing a Class II Bike Lane on both sides of Base Line Road from Etiwanda to the east boundary of the Tentative Tract Map development project; (9) providing a traffic signal at the intersection of Base Line Road and the proposed entrance of the Tentative Tract Map development project; and (10) modifying westbound Base Line Road left-turn lengths at Etiwanda Avenue, as required and dedicating additional right-of-way as needed at intersections. The developer of the Tentative Tract Map development project will dedicate portions of its property for the improvements discussed above. However, the developer of the Tentative Tract Map development project does not own the Subject Property Interests, which are necessary for the improvements to and widening of Base Line Road from Emmett Way to Shelby Place, which is an integral part of the proposed Project. Accordingly, it is necessary that the City Council consider the attached Resolution of Necessity at this time. Environmental Analysis The City studied and analyzed the potential environmental effects of the proposed Project in connection with its analysis of the potential environmental impacts of the Tentative Tract Map pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), Public Resources Code Section 21000, et seq., and the CEQA Guidelines, 14 Cal. Code Regs. Section 15000, et seq. The construction of the proposed Project was studied as an integral part of the Tentative Tract Map. The Planning Commission studied the potential environmental impacts of the proposed Project on August 27, 2003 when it considered the Tentative Tract Map and adopted Resolution No. 03-118. Pursuant to Resolution No. 03-118, the Planning Commission determined and resolved, based on the substantial evidence presented to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, including written and oral staff reports and public testimony, that (1) the Tentative Tract Map was consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; (2) the design or improvements of the Tentative Tract Map was consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; (3) the site was physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (4) the design of the subdivision was not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and 11231.0141/812417,1 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT APRIL 20, 2005 Page 5 wildlife or their habitat; (5) the Tentative Tract Map was not likely to cause serious public health problems; and (6) the design of the Tentative Tract Map would not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. Further, in adopting Resolution No. 03-118, the Planning Commission found that based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment on the Tentative Tract Map development application, there was no substantial evidence that the Tentative Tract Map development project would have a significant effect upon the environment. The City prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration for Tentative Tract Map No. SUBTT16454, Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00478, and Development Review DRC2003~00101 ("Mitigated Negative Declaration"). The County Clerk duly posted the Notice of Determination pursuant to the requirements of CEQA. After considering the evidence before it at its August 27, 2003 meeting, the Planning Commission adopted the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program attached to Resolution No. 03-118 and found that there was no substantial evidence that the Tentative Tract Map development project would have a significant effect up on the environment. In adopting the Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Mitigation Monitoring Program, the Planning Commission made the following findings: 1) That the Mitigated Negative Declaration had been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflected the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, that the Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application; 2) Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that would result if the Tentative Tract Map development project was approved, all significant effects had been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on this development project, which are listed in Resolution No. 03-118 as conditions of approval; and 3) Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission found that in considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Project, there was no evidence that the proposed Project would have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. 11231.0141/S12417.1 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT APRIL20,2005 Page 6 Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission thereby rebutted the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. Accordingly, based on the findings and conclusions set forth in Resolution No. 03-118, the Planning Commission approved the Tentative Tract Map, the Mitigated Negative Declaration, and the Mitigation Monitoring Program, subject to the conditions set forth in the Resolution and in the Standard Conditions attached to Resolution No. 03-118. Specifically, the Planning Commission approved the Tentative Tract Map subject to several conditions, including the conditions concerning the widening of and improvements to Base Line Road discussed above. Resolution No. 03-118 also found that the Tentative Tract Map development project design is consistent with the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the Basic Development Standards therein. For example, the Tentative Tract Map development project would create opportunities wherein a population diverse in terms of income, age, occupation, race, ethnic background, lifestyle, values, interests, and religion may interact, exchange ideas, and realize common goals by creating single-family detached homes with differing price ranges adjacent to other single-family detached homes and multiple family attached homes. In addition, the Planning Commission found the Tentative Tract Map development project would encourage opportunities to mix different, but compatible, land uses and activities, adding single-family detached residences adjacent to proposed multiple-family attached residences. The Planning CommiSsion also found that residential land uses are considered compatible with the Etiwanda Specific Plan as opposed to more intense commercial uses. Finally, the Planning Commission found that the Tentative Tract Map development project would organize land uses to avoid creating nuisances among adjacent land uses. This is consistent with the City's General Plan intent for the Low-Medium Residential District, and would result in an orderly transition in density from the Medium Residential District to the northeast adjacent to the 1-15 Freeway. As shown above, the proposed Project, which would improve and widen Base Line Road, was a condition of the approval of the Tentative Tract Map. Thus, the environmental impacts of the proposed Project, of which the Subject Property Interests are an integral part, were considered in connection with the Tentative Tract Map development project. All of the environmental documentation prepared in connection with Planning Commission Resolution No. 03-118, including any staff reports in connection with Resolution No. 03-118, the Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring 11231.0141/812417.1 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT APRIL 20, 2005 Page 7 Program, and Notice of Determination have been reviewed by City staff in connection with the proposed Resolution of Necessity and on March 8, 2005, pursuant to the crite~ria of Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines and Section 21166 of the Public Resources Code, staff concluded that there have been no substantial changes in the Tentative Tract Map of which the proposed Project is an integral part, and no new information of substantial importance has been obtained that would require further environmental analysis. These environmental findings are the same environmental findings for the proposed acquisition of the Subject Property Interests. The General Plan, Etiwanda Specific Plan, Planning Commission Resolution No. 03-118, the Mitigated Negative Declaration, Notice of Determination, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all environmental documentation concerning the Tentative Tract Map and all Resolutions and project documents regarding the Tentative Tract Map are on file in the City Planning Department and are incorporated in this Staff Report by this reference. Actions of City Pursuant to Government Code Section 7~, et ?~. Pursuant to Government Code Section 7262 et seq., the City of Rancho Cucamonga obtained a fair market appraisal of the Subject Property interests, set just compensation in accordance with the appraised fair market value and extended a written offer letter on January 11, 2005 to the following owners of record of the Subject Property Interests: Shamsaddin Karimi, Gloria Ann Karimi, Hassan Malaklou, and Nahid Nassiri. A true and correct copy of the offer letter is on file in the City Engineer's Office and is incorporated in this Staff Report by this reference. To date, however, no negotiated purchase has been consummated, and the schedule for the proposed Project requires that the City Council consider the proposed Resolution of Necessity at this time.. Necessarv Findin.qs for Adoption of Resolution of NecessitV To adopt the proposed Resolution of Necessity, the City Council must find and determine that: The public interest and necessity require the Project. The Project is planned or located in the manner that will be compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury. The Subject Property Interests described in the Resolution of Necessity are necessary for the Project. 11231.0141/812417.1 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT APRIL 20, 2005 Page 8 The City has made the offer required by Government Code Section 7267.2 to the owners of record of the property it seeks to acquire. As noted above, this hearing relates to Issues A, B, C, and D above. The amount of just compensation is not an issue before the City Council at this hearing. A. The Public Interest and Necessity Require the Project. As explained above, the City seeks to acquire the Subject Property Interests for a public purpose. Specifically, the Subject Property Interests are needed to improve and widen Base Line Road in accordance with the City's "major divided arterial" standards as shown on the Circulation Plan and Standards of the General Plan and consistent with the Etiwanda Specific Plan Figure 5-21. The proposed Project would (1) protect the existing curb and gutter and sidewalk, or repair the existing curb, gutter and sidewalk in the Tentative Tract Map development project area, as required; (2) provide curb, gutter, curvilinear sidewalk and asphalt pavement as required; (3) provide a landscaped median on Base Line Road to the easterly limits of the Tentative Tract Map development project and protect and reconstruct the existing median in Base Line Road as needed to relocate the median break from Emmett Way to Shelby Place; (4) provide 9500 Lumen HPSV streetlights along Base Line Road frontage; (5) provide a bus bay at the southeast corner of Base Line Road and Etiwanda Avenue; (6) protect the existing R26 "No Stopping" signs, or replace same, as required; (7) protect the traffic signal equipment at Base Line Road and Etiwanda Avenue, or relocate or replace same, as required; (8) provide a Class II Bike Lane on both sides of Base Line Road from Etiwanda Avenue to the east boundary of the Tentative Tract Map development project; (9) provide a traffic signal at the intersection of Base Line Road and the proposed entrance of the Tentative Tract Map development project; and (10) modify the westbound Base Line Road left-turn lengths at Etiwanda Avenue, as required and dedicate additional right-of-way as needed at intersections. The street improvements along the frontage of Base Line Road comprising the proposed Project are consistent with the City's General Plan and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The proposed Project would improve and widen Base Line Road consistent with the City's designation in its Circulation Element and in accordance with Figure 5-21 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan of Base Line Road as a "major divided arterial." For example, the ultimate street network for arterial roads and highways designated in the Cimulation Plan of the City's General Plan shows what is required to provide adequate capacity for the City's travel needs based on the General Plan land uses and regional growth as forecasted by the Southern California Association of Governments. Based on the growth in the City and the growth resulting from the Tentative Tract Map development project, the proposed improvements ensure that there will be safe traffic circulation on Base Line Road and at intersections in the vicinity of the Tentative Tract 11231.0141/812417.1 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT APRIL 20, 2005 Page 9 Map development project area. The proposed Project also meets the General Plan's goal (2.6.1.7.2) of providing circulation improvements where development projects involve existing or planned routes. Here, the conditions placed on the Tentative Tract Map development project require the improvements along Base Line Road comprising the proposed Project. The proposed Project also ensures that the level of service along the intersections of Base Line Road are maintained at Level of Service "D" or better, consistent with policy 3.5.1 of the General Plan. This standard helps ensure that traffic moves safely and efficiently throughout the community and that traffic delays are kept to a minimum. The conditions placed on the Tentative Tract Map, including the street improvements comprising the proposed Project, are consistent with the General Plan, which requires adequate mitigation measures prior to, or concurrent with, project development The public interest and necessity require the proposed Project to meet the goals of the General Plan. Growth in the City and the Tentative Tract Map development project make the implementation of the proposed Project necessary at this time. The proposed Project further provides for the public health and safety by ensuring adequate traffic circulation in the vicinity of the Subject Property Interests. The Project is Planned or Located in the Manner that will be Compatible with the Greatest Public Good and Least Private Injury. The Subject Property Interests are necessary for the proposed Project, as planned and located, which consists of the improvements to and widening of Base Line Road. The Subject Property Interests are necessary for the proposed improvements along the frontage of Base Line Road between Emmett Way and Shelby Place. The City's General Plan designates Base Line Road as a major divided arterial and the proposed Project is consistent with that standard. As discussed above, the proposed Project will ensure traffic circulation goals are met. As planned and located, the proposed Project is consistent with the City's General Plan and furthers the goals of improving existing streets and providing adequate traffic circulation to serve this area of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The public health and safety requires that adequate streets and adequate traffic circulation accompany land development. The proposed Project, as planned and located, is necessary to meet the increased growth and development in this part of the City. The Subject Property Interests are necessary for the construction of the proposed Project along the frontage of Base Line Road between Emmett Way and Shelby Place. The larger parcel of which the Subject Property Interests are a part is located on Base Line Road directly between Emmett Way and Shelby Place. The acquisition of the Subject Property Interests is necessary to allow the City to improve Base Line Road in 11231.0141/812417.1 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT APRIL 20, 2005 Page 10 accordance with City "major divided arterial" standards and to ensure adequate traffic circulation. The Subject Property Interests Described in the Resolution of Necessity are Necessary for the Project. The proposed acquisition consists of the acquisition of a permanent street easement on the real property commonly known as 13025 Base Line Road, and identified as Assessor's Pamel Number 1100-011-02, for the proposed improvements to and widening of Base Line Road in the vicinity of the Tentative Tract Map development project area. As set forth above, the Subject Properly Interests are necessary for the proposed Project, which implements the Cimulation Element of the General Plan. The improvements to and widening of Base Line Road between Emmett Way and Shelby Place cannot be completed without the acquisition of the Subject Property Interests. The Subject Property Interests are needed to complete the frontage improvements along Base Line Road, between Emmett Way and Shelby Place, including concrete curb, gutter and sidewalk. The City Made the Offer Required by Government Code Section 7267.2 to the Owners of Record of the Property It Seeks to Acquire. Pursuant to Government Code Section 7262, et seq., the City obtained and approved a fair market value appraisal of the Subject Property Interests, set just compensation in accordance with the approved appraisal, and extended a written offer on January 11, 2005 to the owners of record of the Subject Property Interests, Shamsaddin Karimi, Gloria Ann Karimi, Hassan Malaklou, and Nahid Nassiri. A true and correct copy of the offer letter is on file in the City Engineer's Office and is incorporated in this Staff Report by this reference. The City has received no responses from the owners of record of the Subject Property Interests. Accordingly, the parties have not reached a negotiated purchase at this time. Re/spectf)ully Submitted, WilliaCb J. O'Neil City Engineer 11231.0141/812417.1 Vicinity Map CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION Acquisition in Eminent Domain · to widen Base Line Road across a Portion ofAPN 1100-011-02 N W~E S RESOLUTION NO. 05-094 A RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES AND AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION THEREOF, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS TO AND WIDENING OF BASE LINE ROAD (PORTIONS OF ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 1100-011-02) THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE, ORDER AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is a municipal corporation, in the County of San Bemardino, State of California. Section 2. The real property interests described in Section 3 of this Resolution are to be taken for a public use, namely for a permanent street easement in connection with the proposed improvements to and widening of Base Line Road (the "Project") and all uses necessary or convenient thereto, pursuant to the authority conferred upon the City of Rancho Cucamonga to acquire property by eminent domain by California Constitution Article 1, Section 19, California Government Code sections 37350, 37350.5, 37351, 40401, and 40404 and California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1230.010 et seq. (Eminent Domain Law), including but not limited to Sections 1240.010 through 1240.050, 1240.110, 1240.120, 1240.410, 1240.510, 1240.610, 1240.650, and other provisions of law. Section 3. The City seeks to acquire an approximate 0.127-acre (5,544 square foot) permanent street easement on the real property commonly known as 13025 Base Line Road, and identified as Assessor's Pamel Number 1100-011-02 in connection with the improvements to and widening of Base Line Road ("Subject Property Interests"). The legal description of the Subject Property Interests is attached as Exhibit "A" to this Resolution and the Subject Property Interests are depicted on the diagram attached as Exhibit "B" to this Resolution. Exhibits "A" and "B" are incorporated heroin by this reference. The Subject Property Interests are required to facilitate the widening of and improvements to Base Line Road, which is a public use. Section 4. The proposed Project is consistent with and is a proposed component of the City's General Plan and of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The street improvements comprising the proposed Project were placed as a condition of approval on Tentative Tract Map No. SUBTT16454 ("Tentative Tract Map"). The improvements to and widening of Base Line Road are consistent with the City's designation of Base Line Road as a "major divided arterial" in the Circulation Element of the General Plan. The proposed Project would improve and widen Base Line Road in the Tentative Tract Map development project area in accordance with both the City's "major divided arterial" standards and with Etiwanda Specific Plan Figure 5-21. The proposed Project would protect the existing curb and gutter and sidewalk along Base Line Road in the Tentative Tract Map development project area, or repair the same, as required. The proposed Project would also provide curb, gutter, curvilinear sidewalk and asphalt pavement 11231\0141\812816.1 along Base Line Road in the Tentative Tract Map development project ama' as required. Third, the proposed Project would provide a landscaped median on Base Line Road to the easterly limits of the Tentative Tract Map development project and would protect and reconstruct the existing median in Base Line Road as needed to relocate the median break from Emmett Way to Shelby Place (formerly known as Street "A"). In addition, the proposed Project would provide 9500 Lumen HPSV streetlights along the Base Line Road frontage. It would also provide a bus bay at the southeast comer of Base Line Road and Etiwanda Avenue. In addition, the proposed Project would protect the existing R26 "No Stopping" signs, or replace these, as required. It would also protect traffic signal equipment at Base Line Road and Etiwanda Avenue, or relocate or replace this equipment, as required. Further, the proposed Project would provide a Class II Bike Lane on both sides of Base Line Road from Etiwanda to the east boundary of the Tentative Tract Map development project and provide a traffic signal at the intersection of Base Line Road and the proposed entrance of the Tentative Tract Map development project. Finally, the proposed Project would modify the westbound Base Line Road left-turn lengths at Etiwanda Avenue, as required, and would require the dedication of additional fight-of-way as needed at intersections. The Subject Property Interests are needed to complete the proposed improvements along the frontage of Base Line Road between Emmett Way and Shelby Place. These improvements will further the public health and safety by ensuring adequate traffic circulation in the area. The proposed Project is also in the interest of the public health and safety because it ensures that the level of service along the intersections of Base Line Road in the vicinity of the proposed Project area are maintained at a level of Service "D" or better, consistent with policy 3.5.1 of the General Plan. This standard helps ensure that traffic moves safely and efficiently throughout the community and that traffic delays are kept to a minimum. Section 5. The potential environmental impacts of the proposed Project were studied and analyzed as an integral part of the Planning cormmssion's analysis of the potential environmental impacts of the Tentative Tract Map pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), Public Resoumes Code Section 21000, et seq., and the CEQA Guidelines, 14 Cal. Code Regs. Section 15000, et seq. The Planning Commission studied the potential environmental impacts of the proposed Project on August 27, 2003 when it considered the Tentative Tract Map and adopted Resolution No. 03-118. Pursuant to Resolution No. 03-118, the Planning Commission determined and 'resolved, based on the substantial evidence presented to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, including written and oral staff reports and public testimony, that (1) the Tentative Tract Map was consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; (2) the design or improvements of the Tentative Tract Map was consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; (3) the site was physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (4) the design of the subdivision was not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (5) the Tentative Tract Map was not likely to cause serious public health problems; and (6) the design of the Tentative Tract Map would not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 11231\0141\812816.1 Further, in adopting Resolution No. 03-118, the Planning Commission found that based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment on the Tentative Tract Map development application, there was no substantial evidence that the Tentative Tract Map development project would have a significant effect upon the environment. The City prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16454, Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00478, and Development Review DRC2003-00101 ("Mitigated Negative Declaration"). The County Clerk duly posted the Notice of Determination pursuant to the requirements of CEQA. After considering the evidence before it at its August 27, 2003 meeting, the Planning Commission adopted the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program attached to Resolution No. 03-118 and found that them was no substantial evidence that the Tentative Tract Map development project would have a significant effect up on the environment. In adopting the Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Mitigation Monitoring Program, the Planning Conmmssion made the following findings: (a) That the Mitigated Negative Declaration had been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA Guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflected the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, that the Planning Coramission had reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application; (b) Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identified certain significant environmental effects that would result if the Tentative Tract Map development project was approved, all significant effects had been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on this development project, which were listed in Resolution No. 03-118 as conditions of approval; and (c) Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission found that in considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Tentative Tract Map development project, there was no evidence that the proposed Tentative Tract Map development project would have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission thereby rebutted the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. Accordingly, based on the findings and conclusions set forth in Resolution No. 03-118, the Planning Commission approved the Tentative Tract Map, the Mitigated Negative Declaration, and the Mitigation Monitoring Program, subject to the conditions set forth in the Resolution and in the Standard Conditions attached to Resolution No. 03-118. Specifically, the 11231\0141\812816.1 Planning Commission approved the Tentative Tract Map subject to several conditions, including the improvements to and widening of Base Line Road that comprise the proposed Project. Resolution No. 03-118 also found that the Tentative Tract Map development project design was consistent with the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the Basic Development Standards therein. For example, the Tentative Tract Map development project would create opportunities wherein a population diverse in terms of income, age, occupation, race, ethnic background, lifestyle, values, interests, and religion may interact, exchange ideas, and realize common goals by creating single-family detached homes with differing price ranges adjacent to other single- family detached homes and multiple family attached homes. In addition, the Planning Commission found the Tentative Tract Map development project would encourage opportunities to mix different, but compatible, land uses and activities, adding single-family detached residences adjacent to proposed multiple-family attached residences. The Planning Commission also found that residential land uses are considered compatible with the Etiwanda Specific Plan as opposed to more intense commercial uses. Finally, the Planning Commission found that the Tentative Tract Map development project would organize land uses to avoid creating nuisances among adjacent land uses. This is consistent with the City's General Plan intent for the Low- Medium Residential District, and would result in an orderly transition in density from the Medium Residential District to the northeast adjacent to the 1-15 Freeway. All of the environmental documentation prepared in connection with Planning Commission Resolution No. 03-118, including any staff reports in connection with Resolution No. 03-118, the Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program, and Notice of Determination have been reviewed by City staff in connection with the proposed Resolution of Necessity and on March 8, 2005, pursuant to the criteria of Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines and Section 21166 of the Public Resources Code, staff concluded that them have been no substantial changes in the Tentative Tract Map of which the proposed Project is an integral part, and no new information of substantial importance has been obtained that would require further environmental analysis. These environmental findings are the appropriate environmental findings for the proposed acquisition of the Subject Property Interests. The General Plan, Etiwanda Specific Plan, Planning Commission Resolution No. 03-118, the Mitigated Negative Declaration, Notice of Determination, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all environmental documentation concerning the Tentative Tract Map and all Resolutions and project documents regarding the Tentative Tract Map are on file in the City Planning Department and are incgrporated in this Staff Report by this reference. Section 6. determines that: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby finds and A. The public interest and necessity require the Project; B. The Project is planned and located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury; C. The property described on Exhibit "A" and depicted on Exhibi~ "B" attached hereto is necessary for the proposed Project; 11231\0141\812816.1 D. The offer required by Section 7267.2 of the Government Code was made to the owners of record. Section 7. The City has complied with the notice requirements of Code of Civil Procedure Section 1245.235. Section 8. The findings and declarations contained in this Resolution are based upon the record before the City Council on March 16, 2005, which includes the Staff Report dated March 16, 2005 and all documents referenced therein, including the environmental documents referenced above, and any testimony, records, and documents produced at the hearing, all of which am incorporated heroin by this reference. Section 9. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby authorizes and directs the City Attomey's office and staff to take all steps necessary to commence and prosecute legal proceedings in a court of competent jurisdiction to acquire by eminent domain the property described on Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto. Section 10.' This Resolution shall take effect upon adoption. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga this 20th day of Aphl 2005. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk 11231\0141\812816.1 EXHIBIT "A" DEDICATION FOR BASE LRqE ROAD (APN 1100-011-02) BEING THAT PORTION OF PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 3928, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, PER MAP THEREOF FILED IN BOOK 37, PAGE 28, OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 1; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 1, SOUTH 01°09'56'' WEST 41.56 FEET; THENCE NORTH 41°06'05" WEST 35.12 FEET TO A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND 60.00 FEET. SOUTHERLY, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES, FROM THE CENTERLINE OF BASE LINE ROAD AS SHOWN ON SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY ROAD DEPARTMENT MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT NO. SV-403; THENCE ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, SOUTH 89047'25'' WEST 117.24 FEET; THENCE CONIINUING ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, NORTH 89"52'32" WEST 114.63 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 41033'42'' WEST 34.75 FEET TO A POINT IN A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND 10.00 FEET WESTERLY, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES, FROM THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 1; THENCE SoLrrH 89059'22" WEST 20.00 FEET TO A POINT IN THE WESTERLY LINE OF EMMETf WAY, 30.00 FEET WIDE, AS SHOWN ON SAR) PARCEL MAP; THENCE ALONG LAST- MENTIONED WESTERLY LINE, NORTH 00°00'38" WEST 40.18 FEET TO A POINT IN THE WESTERLY PROLONGATION OF THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 1; THENCE ALONG SAID PROLONGATION AND NORTHERLY LINE, NORTH 89°47'25'' EAST 298.87 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 5,544 SQUARE FEET OF LAND, MORE OR LESS. SEE EXHIBIT "B" ATFACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF. PREPARED BY MADOLE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. OF THE INLAND EMPIRE WILLIAM ROARo JA~'~O', P.L.S. 4756 EXPIRATION DATE: 9/30/2005 J.N. 652-1668 · February 24, 2004 Page 1 of I II EXHIBIT "B" ADDITIONAL STBEET DEDICATION RE: PCL. 1, P.M. 3928 BASE LINE ROAD PER P.I~. J928 I N89'47'25 "E ~ BASELINE ROAD PER SAN BERNARDINO CO, ROAD fDEPT. ~4ASTER PLAN AMENDA~ENT NO. SV-40`3 N89'47'25 N89'# 7'25"E 298.87' 114.6`3, N41 '06'05"W 40. 18' ,35. ADDITIONAL DEDICATION · ~$7',~2"E g'22"E NE COR. PCL. 20. 00' PCL. P.O.B. ~ '56"E ~ P.M. No. 3928 I zo'P.M.B. 37/28 I - D=5'29'07" L=,35.42 Page 1 of ! ~AADOLE & ASSOCIATES, INC. AB 939 APRIL 20, 2005 PRESENTED By Bob Zetterberg, Integrated Waste/NPDES Coordinator HAPPY History Programs Where are we now What are Our Future Plans 939 (Sher) The Integrated Waste "California Integrated Waste Repealed the majority of Title regulating solid waste management, the Public Resources Code. Also repealed provisions of the Health and to garbage and refuse disposal, and codified the Resources Code. Established an integrated waste management hierarch the Board and local agencies in implementation, in priority: (1) source reduction, (2) recycling and com and (3) environmentally safe transformation and land di~ Act--Established the ment Act (IWMA) of 1989." the Government Code, new Act in related Public 1990 1995 an implementation schedule which shows: facilities by January 1, 1995 through source reduction, composting activities; and, · Diversion of 50 percent of all solid waste by January :l, 2000 · through 2000 · source reduction, recycling, · and composting activities. In December 199l submieed the a Source Reduction and Recycling and a Household Hazardous Waste Element the Cali£omia Integrated Waste Management (CiWIViB) outlining the programs we would be implementing to reach the goals set in AB 939. Base Year of 133, 847 Tons of trash being disposed of at various landfills. In 1995 this number was revised to 145,847 to include materials (Tires & Auto Fluff') that been documented in the 1991 SRRE. 3 ~OGRAMS July 1993 - Res~side Recycling 18 Gallon Blue Bin Commingled Recycling December 1993 Waste Block Grant J J-j J~j'j 4 September1994 - gralTl July 1995 - Residential and introducing Green Waste Recycling to residents 5 Recycling Programs Environmental Learning Center Lions East you to learn ZERO waste. Choose package l waste in the I How Long Does it Last? Find out how long a diaper will be in the ground before it disappears. 6 May 2001 Residential Collection Services 96 Gallon Bin 65 Unl (Residents Own Cans) September Less then 25 tons in 2000 Over 350 tons in 2004 July 2003 - :s Amended and Select Load Recycling Implemented Free Waste Audits Turning Waste cash 49 Pr~ 3rdinance Adopted of 4/20/2005 Future Plans? We have begun a Demonstration Project with residents in the Toscana Complex. This Complex have Valet Trash.S Properties and Pro-Am a property maintenance service. Bmxtec Waste Industries Inc., and Waste Management oft Inland Empire are also working with us of these programs throughout the City. Door to Valet Pickup Trash Compactor Recycle Bins 9 In April we will begin recycling programs Carmel, Mountain View, Park View, Montecito, Del Mar, and Evergreen Apartments in th~ Vista area and owned by Lewis Operating Managed by ProAM Incorporated. has staff performing waste audits at the West Valle3 1,000 Residents, Construction sites, & Businesses. The project to evaluated we need to focus more effort on. These audits will include a little dumpster diving picking plus time at the Transfer Station 10 In all the programs being recycled. seen an increase in materials Homes and Population increased Homes and Businesses have grown tremendously since we started these programs in 1993. 11 160,000 140,CO0 ~ucamonga's Diversion Graph 40,000 20,000 Our Goal in the next, [11 be: · Increase Multi-family · Make recommendations to improve Recycling source separation of specific materials i.e. cardboard. · Large Venue Recycling · Food Waste and 12 r~ A N C H O C U C A M O N G A FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Staff Report DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: April 20, 2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Peter M. Bryan, Fire Chief Stephanie Rasmussen, EMS Administrator ADOPT A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING ALL FIRE STATIONS WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AS SAFE SURRENDER SITES FOR NEWBORNS RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve a resolution designating all fire stations within the City of Rancho Cucamonga as safe surrender sites for newborns. BACKGROUND On January 1,2001, California enacted legislation intended to provide for the health and safety of unwanted newborn children. The law was designed to eliminate the abandonment of infants. Over the years, there have been a number of newborns in San Bernardino County who were left on doorsteps or in dumpsters, and many did not survive. The "Safe Arms for Newborns" law (Senate Bill 1368) authored by Senator Jim Brulte, states that "no parent or other person who has lawful custody of a minor child 72 hours old or younger may be prosecuted for child abandonment if he or she voluntarily surrenders physical custody of the child to a designated employee at a public or private hospital emergency room or other location designated by the County Board of Supervisors". In August 2004, Fourth District Supervisor Patti Aguiar recommended to the County Board of Supervisors that manned fire stations in the County of San Bernardino be designated as "Safe Havens" for the purpose of infant surrender. Such a program would enable parents or guardians of newborns to surrender a child at a fire station without fear of legal prosecution for child abandonment. While hospital emergency rooms are the primary designated locations where newborn babies may be surrendered, hospitals are not readily accessible in all areas of the County. Safe Surrender Sites for Newborns April 20, 2005 Page Two Supervisor Aguiar urged that all local fire departments and districts participate in the "Safe Havens" program. The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District is equipped to accept newborns at time of surrender and provide immediate emergency care while en route to a hospital. Rancho Cucamonga Fire District's Manual of Operations, Policy 3-013, Newborn Surrender, outlines the procedures to be followed in the event of a newborn abandonment or surrender. Respectfully submitted, Peter M. Bryan Fire Chief Attachment RESOLUT, ON NO. 05- I' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DESIGNATING PARTICIPATING FIRE STATIONS LOCATED IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AS "SAFE HAVENS" FOR THE SURRENDER OF NEWBORNS WHEREAS, reports have occurred in San Bernardino County of confused and frightened women who, after giving birth, have abandoned their newborn infants without regard to their child's safety, and WHEREAS, the California legislature has enacted legislation intended to provide a safe option to parents or guardians for surrendering unwanted newborn children to safe-surrender sites for medical care, child protection, and permanent placement services, and WHEREAS, the legislation protects the parent or guardian of the newborn from prosecution if he or she voluntarily surrenders physical custody of the child to personnel on duty at a safe-surrender site, and WHEREAS, manned fire stations are equipped to accept newborn babies and provide immediate emergency care while en-route to a hospital, and WHEREAS, San Bernardino County Fire Chiefs Emergency Medical Services Association developed the attached "Safe-Haven" Guidelines for establishing infant safe- surrender sites at participating fire stations that elect to be designated as such, and WHEREAS, the San Bernardino County Fire Chiefs Association, representing all local city and district fire agencies, have endorsed the "Safe-haven" Protocol, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby designate fire stations in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California as infant safe-surrender sites ("Safe Havens"). PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of ,2005. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: William J. Alexander, Mayor Resolution No. 05- Page 2 A'I-]'EST: Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, SECRETARY of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a Regular Meeting of said City Council held on the .__ day of 2005. Executed this day of 2005, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk San Bernard/no County Fire Chief's Association PROCEDURE FOR ACCEPTING A NEWBORN UNDER THE CALIFORNIA SAFE HAVEN LAW PURPOSE: POLICY: State law provides immunity for mothers or persons in lawful custody of newborn infants less than seventy-two (72) hours who surrender these infants to a designated "safe-surrender site" from criminal prosecution. This policy was developed to prevent newborn infants from being abandoned resulting in serious injury or death. It shall be the policy of the Fire Department to allow a mother or any person in lawful custody of an infant minor to surrender an infant to any on-duty firefighter. AUTHORITY Authority for this policy is pursuant to California Health & Safety Code section 1255.7; and California Penal Code section 271.5. II. DEFINITIONS A Fire Station considered a Safe-Surrender Site is: A Fire Station where emergency personnel are present on-site or any emergency scene lpcation to which Fire Department safety personnel respond via a 911 emergency call. The statewide logo that has been adopted by the State Department of Social Services must be clearly visible to the public. Note Fire stations that are not staffed full time should not be considered Safe- Surrender Sites, but should ensure that an emergency telephone is located outside the entrance to the fire station and offers direct communications to the dispatch center. In the event that an infant surrender call is received, a paramedic unit will be immediately dispatched to the site. III. PROCEDURE Department policy is to facilitate the surrender of newborn infants less than seventy-two (72) hours of age by the mother discreetly without fear of being prosecuted for child abandonment as outlined below. Welcome the parent or person surrendering the infant and provide reassurance. Accept custody of the newborn and assess for medical needs. 1. If the newborn is delivered to non-paramedic personnel, maintain custody until the arrival of a paramedic unit. If a "still alarm" at the fire station, notify Dispatch to generate a medical aid call. 1. Respond a paramedic unit if the newborn is surrendered to a non-ALS company. 2. Respond a transport unit. Place the Confidential Infant ID tag from the Newborn Surrender packet on the newborn's ankle and record the code on the Department Rescue Report. Initiate Base Station Hospital contact as soon as reasonably possible to inform the hospital of the situation and ascertain the closest most appropriate receiving facility. 1. Base Station Hospital may direct transport to Labor & Delivery as indicated. 2. Continue to assess and provide for any medical needs of the infant. NOTE: In case of radio communication failure, consider direct transport to Labor & Delivery. Make a concerted effort to apply the identical coded "armband" to the person voluntarily surrendering the newborn. Make a concerted effort to have the person surrendering custody fill-out the authorized questionnaire. The person should be informed that the form is important and may be filled-out on-scene or filled-out and mailed later. Paramedics shall accompany the infant to the receiving facility and transfer custody to a designated hospital employee. Document the name and ID number of the person who received custody of the infant on the Department Rescue Report. From the hospital or as soon as reasonably possible, but within forty-eight (48) hours, notify Child Protective Services of the following: 1. Your name and contact information. 2. Address where incident occurred. 3. Information on Newborn Questionnaire if completed on-scene. 4. Location where newborn was transported. 5. Name of person who received newborn at receiving hospital. 6. Complete a "Child Abuse Investigation Report" (form SS- 8583) upon request or other requested documentation. IV. PROCEDURE FOR INFANTS GREATER THAN 72. HOURS There is no state immunity from criminal prosecution for the surrender of infants greater than seventy-two (72) hours of age available to the mother or person in lawful custody. However, in order to prevent these infants from being abandoned at a later date, the following policy is adopted in handling these situations. Follow the procedure outlined in Section III above. Request Dispatch Center to notify the local Police Department or Sheriff as soon as possible and have them respond to the scene. Brief the officer of the situation and reasons why you believe the infant does not meet the less than seventy-two (72) hour requirement. Paramedics shall accompany the infant to the receiving facility and transfer custody to a designated hospital employee. The hospital staff shall also be informed of the reason why the infant is suspected to not meet the seventy-two (72) hour requirement. As soon as reasonably possible, contact CPS by telephone to make a verbal report. 1. Complete a "Child Abuse Investigation Report" (Form SS- 8583). SUSPECTED CHILD ABUSE In all cases where Department personnel know or reasonably suspect that the infant has been the subject to physical or sexual abuse, CPS should be notified. California Safe Haven Law San Bernardino County California Safe Haven Law Senator Jim Brulte introduced Safely Surrender Baby law (SB 1368) Governor Davis signed California Safe 2001 it into law on September 2000 Haven Law went into effect on January 9 Senate Bill 116, introduced by Sen Bob Dutton will make permanent a law to allow mother's to safely surrender their child within 72 hours of its birth, unanimously passed the State Senate California Safe Haven Law This bill provides that no parent or other person having lawful custody of a minor child 72 hours old or younger may be prosecuted for child abandonment if he or she voluntarily surrenders physical custody of the child to any employee on duty at a public or private hospital emergency room, or any additional location designated by the board of supervisors. The bill requires the person taking physical custody of such a child to provide a medical screening examination and any necessary medical care to the child, and to provide the person surrendering custody a specified medical information questionnaire. The bill specifies that no person or entity that accepts a surrendered child shall be subject to civil, criminal, or administrative liability for accepting the child and caring for the child in the good faith belief that action is required or authorized by the bill, including, but not limited to, instances where the child is older than 72 hours or the person surrendering the child did not have lawful physical custody of the child. Fire Department Guidelines DEFINTIONS: Safe-Surrender site means any Fire Station where emergency personnel are present on- site, or any emergency scene location to which Fire safety personnel respond via a 911 emergency call,. Fire Department Guidelines Initiate Base Station Hospital contact as soon as reasonably possible. BSH will assist in directing closest most appropriate hospital BSH may direct transport directly to a Delivery department Labor & Continue to assess and provide medical treatment as needed 4. In case of radio communication failure, consider direct transport to closest most appropriate Labor & Delivery department. Fire Department Guidelines If infant surrendered 1S greater than 72 hours of age: ^. Follow the surrender procedures B. Request Dispatch notify Police Department and have them respond to the scene c. Brief the officer of the situation and reasons why you believe the infant does not meet the less than seventy-two (72) hour requirement D. Accompany the infant to the receiving facility and transfer custody to designated hospital staff. Inform the hospital staff of the reasons why the infant is suspected to not meet the seventy-two hour (72) requirement RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Staff Report DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: April 20, 2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Cindy Hackett, Associate Engineer~ Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Te~ ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED AND AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $6,810,793.70 TO THE APPARENT LOW BIDDER, RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., AND AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF A 10% CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $681,079.37 FOR THE HAVEN AVENUE STREET WIDENING AND STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FROM BASE LINE ROAD TO NORTH OF 19TM STREET, TO BE FUNDED FROM TRANSPORTATION FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO. 11243035650/1406124-0 AND BEAUTIFICATION FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO. 11103165650/1464110-0 AND APPROPRIATE AN ADDITIONAL AMOUNT OF $1,100,000.00 TO ACCOUNT NO. 11243035650/1406124-0 FROM TRANSPORTATION FUND BALANCE RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $6,810,793.70 to the apparent Iow bidder, Riverside Construction Company, Inc., and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $681,079.37, for the Haven Avenue Street Widening and Storm Drain Improvement Project from Base Line Road to North of 19'h Street, to be funded from Transportation funds, Account No. 11243035650/1406124_0 and Beautification funds, Account No. 11103165650/1464110_0 and appropriate an additional amount of $1,100,000.00 to Account No. 11243035650/1406124_0 from Transportation fund balance. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on March 29, 2005, for the subject project. The Engineer's estimate was $5,729,225.00. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements with any irregularities to be inconsequential. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Accept Bids Received and Award the Haven Avenue Street Widening and Storm Drainlmprovements April20,2005 Page 2 The construction of this project is to install master plan storm drain with pertinent laterals and catch basins; widen the west side of the street; pavement rehabilitation; install concrete curb and gutter, sidewalk, drive approaches, block retaining walls, wrought iron fences, landscape and irrigation of median islands, street lights; relocation of traffic poles, traffic signal loops; re-striping and pavement markings. The contract documents call for eighty (80) working days to complete this construction. The increase of the construction cost over the Engineer's estimate is attributed to the increase in steel and concrete costs throughout the industry. The additional appropriation will cover the increased construction cost, the 10% contingency, soils and materials testing, construction survey, and Southem California Edison's cost for the new street lighting. Respectfully submitted, Willia~ J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:CH/RO:Is Attachment BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING MARCH 29, 2005 Haven Avenue Street Widening and Storm Drain Improvement Project ENGINEERS COST From Base Line Road to North of 19th Street ESTIMATE UNIT NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT 1 LS Clearing & Grabbing (including all removals, unclassified excavation/fill, disposal and $150,000.00 $150,000.013 la. 4500 CY Imported Borrow (compacted in place) $10.00 $45,000.00 2. 1450 TON CmshedAggregate Base $20.00 $29,000.00 3 I015 TON Asphalt Concrete Pavement (including pavement preparation) $55.00 $55,825.00 4. 4890 TON Asphalt Rubber Hot Mix (including pavement preparation, routing and crack sealing) $65.00 $317,850.00 5. 42020, SF Cold Plane (minimum 5 feet wide) $0.30 $126,060.00 6. 39 EA Adjust Manhole Frame & Cover to Finish Grade $400.00 $15,600.00 7. 32 EA Adjust Valve Box & Cover to Finish Grade $250.00 $8,000.00 8. EA Ad. just Clean Out Frame & Cover to Grade $250.00 $250.00 9~ 1 EA Catch Basin Std. 300, W=28' (including local depression) $10,000.00 $10,000.013 10~ 1 EA Catch Basin Std. 302, W=27.33' (including local depression) $10,000.00 $10,000.00 l 1. 2 EA Brooks Products No. 3636CB 36" X 36" Precast Catch Basin w/extensions, bottom ilo, 12. 2 EA 18" $2,500.00 $5,000.00 Diameter CMP Catch Basin $2,000.00 $4,000.00 13. 3 EA Construct Local Depression on Existing Catch Basin $1,500.00 $4,500.00 14 1 EA lunctionStmctureNo. 1 B=21" $3,750.00 $3,750.00 15. EA lunction Structure No. 1 B=24" $3,750.00 $3,750.00 16. EA Junction Structure No. 1 B=33" $4,000.00 $4,000.00 17. 2 EA Junction Structure No. 1 B=36" $4,000.001 $8,000.00 18. EA Junction StmctureNo. 1 B=54" $5,000.00 $5,000.00 19. 1 EA Junction Structure No. 1 B=60" $5,250.00 $5,250.013 20. t EA Junction Structure No. 1 B=66" $5,500.00 $5,500.0~ 21. 2 EA Junction Structure No. 2 B=24" $2,750.00 $5,500.00 22. 2 EA Junction Structure No. 4 B=I 8" 23. 3 EA Transition Structure No. 1 $2,500.00 $5,000.00 24. 1 EA Transition Structure No. 3 $10,000.00 $30,000.00 25. 2 EA Manhole No. 2 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 26'1 ~ E'l~'-' Manhole No. 3 ~ $4,000.001 $8,000.00 27._.~ ~2 EA Manhole No. 3 W/pressure Lid ~ $10,00-~-'~ 28._...~ ~ EA _ Manhole No. 4 29. EA Manhole Shaft On 102" RCP ~ 30___a ~2 E~A_ Break Into Existin.~._Catch Basin $3,500.001 $3,500.0(~ 31. 5 EA P.C.C. Collar ~ 32-~ ~ E'~"~'- ~osure $2,500.00] $12,500.00 $14,00o.o--0 33..~.~ __ 1 LS Backfill Existin_.g_RCB W/SIu[D~ and Bulkhead Ends $15,000.00 $15,000.00 34. 1302 LF Construct 10' Wide x 7' High Cast in Place RCB $800.0~0 $1,041,600.00 35. 173 LF Construct 10' Wide x 7'~ Precast RCB 36~'~ 1'~"~ LF Construct 8.5' Wide x 6'H_..~Precast RCB $850.00 $147,050.00 $750.00 $141,000.00 37._.~. 18.~.._~ L.~.~._F Reinforced Concrete To~ Channel $'--~ 00.0'~ $55,200.00 38. 4 EA Uom~vressible Blanket Protection $2,500.00 $10,000.00 39. 4 EA Conduit Sup2ort 40~. 187'--~ L'-'--'~ Construct T_.~..~ Garden Wall Complete $2~ 41'~-~22'-~0 LF $65.00 $122,070.013 .... $i30.00 $28,600.0 42~ 35.~7 L.__._.~F ............... ~t Iron Fence Corn let?p.~ $190.00 $67,830.00 43. 151 LF Construct T_T. Xp~ Garden Wall Complete $150.00 $22,650.00 44. 550 LF 8" p.C.C. Curb ~ 45'---~. 405~ LF 8" P.C.C. Curb & 24" Gutter $15.00 $8,250.00 46. 4 EA 8" p.C.C. Busba_~. ~ 47-~' 3000'--~ S"---'~- 4" P.C.C. Sidewalk $25,000.00 $100,000.00 48. 1 EA ['.C.C. Wheel Chair R~ $5.0~0 $150,000.00 49. 2 EA P.C.C. Wheel Chair Ra~ $4,500.00 $4,500.00 50. 1 ES Bracing and Shorm_.~[ $5,000.00 $10,00--~.00 .... ~ $250,000.00 BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING MARCH 29, 2005 Haven Avenue Street Widening and Storm Drain Improvement Project From Base Line Road to ENGINEERS COST North of 19th Street ESTIMATE UNIT NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT 51. 1860 LF 102" RCP (1400D) with 1" additional cover over rebar inside pipe $650.00 $1,209,000.00 52. 4 LF 66" RCP(1400D) $500.00[ $2,000.00 53. 467 LF 60" RCP(2000D) $500.00 $233,500.00 54. 19 LF 54" RCP (1200D) $500.00 $9,500.00 55. 510 LF 48"RCP(3000D) 56. 74 LF 36" RCP (1750D) $450.00 $229,500.00 $425.00 $31,450.00 57. 20 LF 33"RCP (1500D) $400.00 $8,000.00 58. 79 LF 24"RCP (2000D) $250.00 $19,750.00 59. 22 LF 21"RCP(2000D) $250.00 $5,500.00 60. 55 LF 18" RCP (3000D) $200.00 $11,000.00 61 I LS Install Street Light Conduit, Pull Rope, Pull Boxes and Structures Per Southern Califom $200,000.00 $200,000.00 62. 4425 LF Install 2" Interconnect Conduit with Pull Rope $10.00 $44,250.00 63. 13 EA ?ull Boxes $250.00 $3,250.00 64. 115 LF Install 3" Interconnect Conduit with Pull Rope $15.00 $1,725.00 65. LS Traffic Signal and Lighting at Haven Avenue and Base Line Road $75,000.00 $75,000.00 66. LS Traffic Signal and Lighting at Haven Avenue and Victoria Street $75,000.00 $75,000.00 67. I LS Traffic Signal and Lighting at Haven Avenue and 19th Street $75,000.001 $75,000.0(3 68. 402 EA Install Ground Cover 1 Gal. $10.00 $4,020.0~J 69. 2 EA Automatic irri~ation System (uicludin~ hot tap, service meter box and R.P. Assembly) $25,000.00 $50,000.00 70. 19078 SF SoilPreparation/FinalGrade $0.50 $9,539.00 71. 2 EA Maintenance Period 72. 1856 EA 1 Gal. Shrub $5,000.00 $I0,000.00 73 766 EA 5 Gal. Shrub $10.001 $18,560.00 $20.001 $15,320.00 74. 29 EA 24" BoxTree $250.001 $7,250.00 75. 4 EA 15' BTF Tree $500.00 $2,000.00 76. 2 EA Relocate Existing Palm Tree $500.00 $1,000.00 77. 273 LF Concrete Header $12.00 $3,276.00 78. 23 EA Boulder 24" $75.00 $1,725.00 79. 20 EA Boulder 36" $125.00 $2,500.0C 80. 10 EA Boulder48" $250.00 $2,500.00 81. 2698 SF Cobble Paving $5.00[ $13,490.00 82. 1270 SF RetardantConcrete Pavin~ $5.00 $6,350.00 83. 337 SF Aggregate Finish Concrete $5.00 $1,685.00 84. 1 LS Traffic Sil~nmg Striping, Pavement Markings, etc, complete in place $50,000.00 $50,000.00 85. 1 LS Traffic Control $100,000.00 $100,000.00 86.11 LS SWPPP $5,000.00 $5,000.00 SHEET lB TOTAL $5,729,225.00 BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING MARCH 29, 2005 /IPPARENTLOWBIDDER Haven Avenue Street Widening and Storm Drain Improvement Project From Base Line Road to North of 19th Street Riverside Construction Company, Inc. UNIT BID CORRECTED NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT AMOUNT 1. 1 LS Clearing & Grabbing (including all removals, unclassified excavat~o~ $700,000.00 $700,000.0(1 $700,000.00 la. 4500 CY Imported Borrow (compacted in place) $10.0(1 $45,000.00 $45,000.00 2. 1450 TON Crashed Aggregate Base $35.00 $50,750.00 $50,750.012 3. 1015 TON Asphalt Concrete Pavement (including pavement preparation) $65.00 $65,975.00 $65,975.013 4. 4890 TON Asphalt Rubber Hot Mix (including pavement preparation, routing am $75.00 $366,750.00 $366,750.00 5. 420200 SF Cold Plane (mininaum 5 feet wide) $0.20 $84,040.00 $84,040.00 6. 39 EA Adjust Manhole Frame & Cover to Fimsh Grade $700.00 $27,300.00 $27,300.00 7. 32 EA Adjust Valve Box & Cover to Finish Grade $250.00 $8,000.00 $8,000.00 8., EA Adjust Clean Out Frame & Cover to Grade $500.00 $500.00 $500.00 9. EA Catch Basin Std. 300, W=28~ (including local depression) $12,500.00 $12,500.00 $12,500.00 10. EA Catch Basin Std. 302, W=27.33~ (including local depression) $12,000.001 $ I2,000.00 $12,000.00 11. 2 EA Brooks Products No. 3636CB 36" X 36" Precast Catch Basin w/exte~ $2,500.00[ $5,000.00 $5,000.00 12. 2 EA 18" Diameter CMP CatchBas~n $2,500.00[ $5,000.00 $5,000.0C 13. 3 EA Construct Local Depression on Existing Catch Basin $I,000.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.0(1 14. I EA Junction Structure No. 1 B=21" $750.00 $750.00 $750.00 15. 1 EA Junction Structure No. I B--24" $750.00 $750.001 $750.00 16. 1 EA Junction Structure No. I B=33" $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 17. 2 EA Junction Structure No. 1 B--36" $1,000.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 18. I EA Junction Structure No. 1 B=54" $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 19. l EA Junction Structure No. 1 B=60" $4,500.00 $4,500.00 $4,500.00 20. EA Junction Structure No. 1 B=66" $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 21. 2 EA Junct on Structure No. 2 B=24" $850.00 $1,700.00 $1,700.00 22. 2 EA Junction Structure No. 4 B=18" $750.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 23. 3 EA Transition Structure No. I $12,000.00 $36,000.00 $36,000.0(1 24. 1 EA Transition Structure No. 3 $7,000.00 $7,000.00 $7,000.0(1 25. 2 EA Manhole No. 2 $4,500.00 $9,000.00 $9,000.00 26. 2 EA Manhole No. 3 $2,500.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 27. 2 EA ManholeNo. 3 W/pressure Lid $2,800.001 $5,600.00 $5,600.00 28. 1 EA Manhole No. 4 $25,000.00] $25,000.00 $25,000.00 29. 1 EA Manhole Shaft On 102" RCP 30. 2 EA BreakInto Existing Catch Basin $1,500.001 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $1,000.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 3I EA ?.C.C. Collar $2,500.00 $12,500.00 $12,500.00 32~ 4 EA Pi~e Closure $750.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 33. LS Backfill Existing RCB W/Slurry and Bulkhead Ends $28,000.00 $28,000.00 $28,000.00 34. 1302 LF Construct 10'Wide x 7' High Cast in Place RCB $1,050.0(1 $1,367,100.00 $1,367,100.0(1 35. 173 LF Construct 10' Wide x 7' High Precast RCB $1.050.00 $181,650.00 $181,650.0(1 36. 188 LF Construct 8.5' Wide x 6' High Precast RCB $1,200.00 $225,600.00 $225,600.00 37. 184 LF Reinforced Concrete Top on Existing Chmmel $475.0oI $87,400.00 $87,400.00 38. 4 EA Compressible Blanket Protection $100.001 $400.00 $400.00 39. 4 EA Conduit Support $2,000.00 $8,000.00 $8,000.00 40. 1878 LF Construct Type I Garden Wall Complete SI 80.00 $338,040.00 $338,040.00 41 220 LF Consn'uct Type 2 Retaining Wall With 4.67' High Wrought Iron Fenc{ $390.00 $85,800.0(1 $85,800.00 42~ 357 LF Construct Type 3 Retaining Wall With 4.67' High Wrought Iron Fen, $475.00 $169,575.00 $169,575.00 43. 151 LF Eonstmct Type 4 Garden Wall Complete $265.001 $40,015.00 $40,015.00 44. 550 LF 8" P.C.C. Curb $11.001 $6,050.00 $6,050.0C 45. 4050 LF 8" P.C.C. Curb & 24" Gutter $13.001 $52,650.00 $52,650.0(1 46. 4 EA 8"P.C.C. Busbay $12,500.001 $50,000.00 $50,000.0(1 47. 30000 SF 4" P.C.C. Sidewalk 48'-~ ~ E'--~- P.C.C. Wheel Chair Ra~ ~ $97,500.00 $97,500.00 $850.001 $1,700.00 $850.00 49.__.~ 2 E~A P.C.C. Wheel Chair Ram d_~.~.~ $1,650.001 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 __~ LS Bracingand Shorin..g_~ $200,000.001 $200,000.00 $200,000.0'~---~ S.E----f7 2-X-- I BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING MARCH 29, 2005 Haven Avenue Street Widening and Storm Drain Improvement Project From Base Line Road to North of 19th Street Riverside Construction Company, Inc. UNIT BID CORRECTEE NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT AMOUNT 51. 1860 LF 102" RCP (1400D) with 1" additional cover over rebar inside p~pe $525-001 $976,500.001 $976,500.0(3 52. 4 LF 66" RCP (1400D) $350.001 $1,400.00 $1,400.00 53. 467 LF 60" RCP (2000D) $280.00[ $130,760.00 $130,760.00 54. 19 LF 54" RCP (1200D) $285.00 $5,415.00 $5,415.00 55.~ 510 LF 48" RCP (3000D) $235.00 $119,850.00 $119,850.00 56 74 LF 36" RCP (1750D) $225.001 $16,650.00 $16,650.00 57. 20 LF 33" RCP (1500D) $225.001 $4,500.00 $4,500.00 58. 79 LF 24" RCP (2000D) $215.001 $16,985.0(~ $16,985.00 59. 22 LF 21" RCP (2000D) $215.001 $4,730.00 $4,730.00 60. 55 LF 18" RCP (3000D) $210.00[ $11,550.00 $11,550.0C 61. LS Install Street Light Conduit, Pull Rope, Pull Boxes nnd Structures Per $100,000.00 $ 100,000.00 $100,000.0(3 62. 4425 LF Instali 2" Intercom~ect Conduit with Pull Rope $20.00 $88,500.00 $88,500.0(~ 63. 13 EA Pull Boxes $150.001 $1,950.00 $1,950.00 64. 115 LF Install 3" Interconnect Conduit with Pull Rope $25.00 $2,875.00 $2,875.00 65. 1 LS Traffic Signal and Lighting at Haven Avenue and Base Line Road $185,000.00 $185,000.00 $185,000.00 66. 1 LS Traffic Signal and Lighting at Haven Avenue and Victoria Street $185,000.00 $185,000.00 $185,000.00 67. I ES Iraffic Signal and Lighting at Haven Avenue and 19th Street $185,000.00 $185,000.00 $185,000.00 68. 402 EA InstallGround Cover I Gal. $7.501 $3,015.00 $3,015.00 69. 2 EA Automatic irrigation System (including hot tap, service meter box and $1.001 $2.001 $2.00 70. 19078 SF SoilPreparation/FinalGrade $0.15 $2,861.70 $2,861.70 7l 2 EA Maintenance Period $3,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 72. 185~ EA Gal. Stu-ub $8.00 $14,848.00 $14,848.0(~ 73. 766 EA 5 Gal. Stu~ab $18.00 $13,788.00 $13,788.013 74. 29 EA 24"BoxTree $300.00 $8,700.00 $8,700.0(I 75. 4 EA 15' BTF Tree $7,000.00 $28,000.00 $28,000.00 76. 2 EA Relocate Existing PalmTree $2,500.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 77. 273 LF Concrete Header $10.00 $2,730.00 $2,730.00 78. 23 EA Boulder 24" $85.00 $1,955.001 $1,955.00 79. 20 EA Boulder 36" $90.00 $1,800.001 $1,800.00 80. 10 EA Boulder 48" $140.00 $1,400.00 $1,400.00 81. 2698 SF Cobble Paving $7.50 $20,235.00 $20,235.00 82. 1270 SF Retardant Concrete Paving $7.00[ $8,890.00 $8,890.00 83. 337 SF Aggregate Finish Concrete $7.00 $2,359.00 $2,359.00 84., LS Fraffic Signing, Striping, Pavement Markings, etc., complete in place $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.0C 85 LS Fraffic Control $150,000.001 $150,000.00 $150,000.0C 86. LS gWPPP $25,000.00! $25,000.00 $25,000.013 SHEET 2B TOTAL $6,811,643.701 $6~810,793.70 BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING MARCH 29, 2005 Haven Avenue Street Widening and Storm Drain Improvement Project From Base Line Road to North of 19th Street Mike Bubalo Construction, Inc. UNIT BID CORRECTED NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT AMOUNT 1. LS Clearing & Grabbing (including all removals, unclassified excavation/ $928,000.00 $928,000.00 $928,000.00 la. 450C CY Imported Borrow(compactedinplace) $10.00 $45,000.00 $45,000.00 2. 14513 TON Cmshed Aggregate Base $20.00 $29,000.00 $29,000.00 3. 1015 TON Asphalt Concrete Pavement (including pavement preparation) $55.00 $55,825.00 $55,825.00 4. 4890 TON Asphalt Rubber Hot Mix (including pavement preparation, routing and $64.00[ $312,960.00 $312,960.00 5. 420200 SF Cold Plane (minimum 5 feet wide) $0.25 $105,000.00 $105,050.0~ 6. 39 EA Adjust Manhole Frame & Cover to Finish Grade $400.00 $15,600.00 $15,600.01; 7. 32 EA Adjust Valve Box & Cover to Finish Grade $200.00[ $6,400.00 $6,400.00 8. i EA Adjust Clean Out Frame & Cover to Grade $300.00 $300.00 $300.00 9. I EA Catch Basin Std. 300, W=28' (including local depression) $8,000.00 $8,000.00[ $8,000.00 10. I EA Catch Basin Std. 302, W=27.33' (including local depression) $9,000.00[ $9,000.00 $9,000.00 I l. 2 EA Brooks Products No. 3636CB 36" X " ' 36 Precast Catch Basin w/exter $5,000.00 $10,000.00 $ I 0,000.00 12. 2 EA 18" Diameter CMP Catch Basra $7,000.00 $14,000.00 $14,000.00 13. 3 EA Conslruct Local Depression on Existing CatchBasin $4,000.00[ $12,000.00 $12,000.00 14. EA Junction Stmcture No. 1 B=21" $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 15. EA Junction Structure No. 1 B=24" $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 16. EA Junction Structure No. I B=33" $4,000.00 $4,000.01; $4,000.00 17. 2 EA Junction Structure No. 1 B=36" $5,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.0C 18. EA Junction Structure No. I B=54" $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.01; 19. I EA Junction Structure No. 1 B=60" $6,500.00 $6,500.00 $6,500.01~ 20. 1 EA Junction Stmcture No. 1 B=66" $7,000.00 $7,000.00 $7,000.00 21. 2 EA Junction Stmcture No. 2 B=24" $3,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 22. 2 EA Junction Structure No. 4 B=I8" $2,500.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 23. 3 EA l'ransition Structure No. 1 $35,000.00 $105,000.00 $105,000.00 24. 1 EA rransitinn Structure No. 3 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 25. 2 EA ManholeNo. 2 $10,000.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 26. 2 EA ManholeNo. 3 $6,000.o01 $12,000.00 $12,000.00 27 2 EA Manhole No. 3 W/pressure Lid $8,000.00 $16,000.00 $16,000.00 28. EA Manhole No. 4 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 29. EA Manhole Shaft On 102"RCP $8,000.00 $8,000.00 $8,000.0£ 30. 2 EA Break Into Existing CatchBasin $3,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.01; 31. 5 EA P.C.C. Collar $3,000.001 $15,000.00 $15,000.0/3 32. 4 EA Pipe Closure $3,000.00[ $12,000.00 $12,000.00 33. I LS Backfill Existing RCB W/Slurry and Bulkhead Ends $50,000.001 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 34. 1302 LF Construct 10' Wide x 7' High Cast in Place RCB $800.00 $1,041,600.00[ $1,041,600.00 35. 173 LF Construct 10' Wide x 7' High Precast RCB $1,000.00 $173,000.00 $173,000.00 36. 188 LF Construct 8.5' Wide x 6' High Precast RCB $900.001 $169,200.00 $169,200.00 37. 184 LF Reinforced Concrete Top onExisting Channel $500.00 $92,000.00 $92,000.00 38. 4 EA Compressible Blanket Protection $1,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 39. 4 EA ~Conduit Support $600.00 $2,400.00 $2,400.00 40. 1878 LF Construct Type I GardenWall Complete $200.00 $375,600.00 $375,600.00 41 22C LF Construct Type 2 Retaining Wall With 4.67' High Wrought Iron Fence $400.00 $88,000.00 $88,000.00 42. 357 LF Construct Type 3 Retaining Wall With 4.67' High Wrought Iron Fence $475.00 $169,575.00 $ I69,575.01; 43. 151 LF Construct Type 4 Garden Wall Complete $300.00 $45,300.00 $45,300.01; 44. 550 LF 8" P.C.C. Curb $13.00 $7,150.00 $7,150.00 45. 4050 LF 8" P.C.C. Curb & 24" Gutter $18.001 $72,900.00 $72,900.00 46. 4 EA 8" P.C.C. Busba¥ $15,000.001 $60,000.00 $60,000.00 47. 30000 SF 4" P.C.C. Sidewalk $3.001 $90,000.00 $90,000.00 48. EA P.C.C. Wheel Chair Ramp (single) $500.001 $500.00 $500.00 49. 2 EA ?.C.C. Wheel Chair Ramp (dual) $800.00 $1,600.00 $1,600.00 50.LS Bracing and Shoring $650,000.00 $650,000.00 $650,000.00 , SHEET 3A BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING MARCH 29, 2005 Haven Avenue Street Widening and Storm Drain Improvement Project From Base Line Road to North of 19th Street Mike Bubalo Construction, Inc. UNIT BID CORRECTED NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT AMOUNT 51. 1860 LF 102" RCP (1400D) with 1" additiunal cover ovcrrebar inside pipe $625.00 $1,162,500.00 $1,162,500.00 52. 4 LF 66" RCP (1400D) $550.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 53. 467 LF 60"RCP(2000D) $500.00 $233,500.00 $233,500.00 54. 19 LF 54" RCP (1200D) $450.001 $8,550.00 $8,550.0C 55. 510 LF 48" RCP(3000D) $400.00 $204,000.0(3 $204,000.0(3 56. 74 LF 36" RCP (1750D) $300.00 $22,200.00 $22,200.00 57. 20 LF 33" RCP (1500D) $225.00 $4,500.00 $4,500.00 58. 79 LF 24" RCP (2000D) $200.00 $3,850.00 $15,800.00 59. 22 LF 21"RCP (2000D) $175.0~3 $3,850.00 $3,850.00 60. 55 LF 18" RCP (3000D) $125.00 $6,875.00 $6,875.00 61. LS Install Street Light Conduit, Pull Rope, Pull Boxes and Structures Per $100,000.00 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 62. 4425 LF Install 2" Interconnect Conduit with Pull Rope $30.00 $132,750.00 $132,750.00 63. 13 EA PullBoxes $300.00 $3,900.00 $3,900.00 64. 115 LF Install 3" Interconnect Conduit with Pull Rope $60.00 $6,900.00 $6,900.0C 65. I LS Traffic Signal and Lighting at Haven Avenue and Base Line Road $200,000.00 $200,000.0(3 $200,000.0(3 66. I LS Traffic Signal and Lighting at Haven Avenue and Victoria Street $200,000.00 $200,000.00 $200,000.00 67. 1 LS Traffic Signal and Lighting at Haven Avenue and 19th Street $250,000.00 $250,000.00 $250,000.00 68. 402 EA Install Ground Cover 1 Gal. $12.00 $4,824.00 $4,824.00 69. 2 EA Automatic irrigation System (including hot tap, service meter box and $55,000.0(3 $110,000.00 $110,000.00 70. 19078 SF SoilPreparation/FinalGrade '$1.25 $23,847.50 $23,847.50 71. 2 EA Maintenance Period $3,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 72. 1856 EA 1 Gal. Shrub $10.00 $18,560.00 $18,560.00 73. 766 EA 5 Gal. Shrub $15.00 $11,490.00 $11,490.0C 74. 29 EA 24" Box Tree $500.00 $14,500.00 $14,500.0(3 75. 4 EA' 15'BTF Tree $15,000.00 $60,000.0(3 $60,000.00 76. 2 EA Relocate Existing PalmTree $3,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 77. 273 LF Concrete Header $20.00 $5,460.00 $5,460.00 78. 23 EA Boulder 24" $175.00 $4,025.00 $4,025.00 79. 20 EA Boulder 36" $250.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 80 lC EA Boulder 48" $500.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 81. 2698 SF Cobble Paving $10.00 $26,980.00 $26,980.00 82. 127~ SF Retardant Concrete Paving $20.00 $25,400.00 $25,400.00 83. 337 SF Aggregate Finish Concrete $30.001 $10,1 I0.00 $I0,110.00 84. 1 LS Traffic Signing, Striping, Pavement Markings, etc., complete in place $40,000.00 $40,000.00 $40,000.0C 85. I LS Traffic Control $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.0(3 86. I LS SWPPP $10,000.001 $10,000.00i $10,000.00 SHEET 3B TOTALI $7,883,631.501 $7,883,681.50 BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING MARCH 29, 2005 Haven Avenue Street Widening and Storm Drain Improvement Project Steve Bubalo Construction From Base Line Road to North of 19th Street Belczak & Sons, Inc. Co. UNIT UNIT NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT 1.' l LS Clearing & Grabbing (including all removals, unclassified $550,000.00 $550,000.00 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 la 4500 CY Imported Borrow (compacted in place) $20.00 $90,000.00 $10.00 $45,000.00 2. 1450 TON Crashed Aggregate Base $20.00 $29,000.00 $40.00 $58,000.00 3. 1015 TON Asphalt Concrete Pavement (including pavement preparati $55.001 $55,825.00 $60.00 $60,900.00 4. 4890 TON Asphalt Rubber Hot Mix (including pavement preparation $68.00 $332,520.00 $65.00 $317,850.00 5. 4202012 SF Cold Plane (minimum 5 feet wide) $0.20 $84,040.00 $0.213 $84,040.00 6. 39 EA Adjust Manhole Frame & Cover to Finish Grade $400.00 $15,600.00 $300.00 $11,700.00 7. 32 EA ,Adjust Valve Box & Cover to Finish Grade $300.00 $9,600.00 $200.00 $6,400.00 8. EA Adjust Clean Out Frame & Cover to Grade $600.00 $600.00 $300.00 $300.00 9. 1 EA Catch Basin Std. 300, W=28' (including local depression) $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $8,000.00 $8,000.00 10. 1 EA Catch Basin Std. 302, W=27.33'(includinglocaldepressm $16,000.00 $16,000.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 11. 2 EA Brooks Products No. 3636CB 36" X 36" Precast Catch Bm $1,200.00 $2,400.00 $4,000.00 $8,000.00 12. 2 EA 18" Diameter CMP Catch Basin $3,000.00 $6,000.0C $1,500.00 $3,000.00 13 3 EA Construct Local Depression on Existing Catch Basin $1,500.00 $4,500.013 $800.00 $2,400.00 14. I EA Junction Structure No. I B=21" $700.00 $700.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 15. I EA Junction Stmcture No. I B=24" $700.00 $700.00 $1,000.001 $1,000.00 16. EA 1unction Structure No. I B=33" $1,400.00 $1,400.00 $1,100.00 $1,100.0C 17. 2 EA luncfion Structure No. I B=36" $1,100.00 $2,200.00 $1,300.00 $2,600.013 18. EA Junction Structure No. 1 B=54" $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 19. 1 EA Junction Structure No. 1 B=60" $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 20. 1 EA Junction Structure No. 1 B=66'' $8,000.00 $8,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 21. 2 EA Junction StmctureNo. 2 B=24" $1,500.00 $3,000.00 $1,200.00 $2,400.00 22. 2 EA Junction StmctureNo. 4 B=18" $900.00 $1,800.012 $200.00 $400.00 23. 3 EA Transition Structure No. 1 $17,500.00 $52,500.013 $9,000.00 $27,000.00 24. 1 EA Transition Structure No. 3 $6,000.001 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 25. 2 EA Manhole No. 2 26'~ '-~2: EA Manhole No. 3 ~ $9,000.00 $4,000.0(3 $8,000.00 $2,000.001 $4,000.00 $1,000.0'1'~ $2,000.00 27. 2 EA Manhole No. 3 W/pressure Lid $3,500.00 $7,000.00 $4,000.00 $8,000.01; 28.____: EA Manhole No. 4 $28,000.00 $28,000.00 $13,000.00 $13,000.00 29. --7 EA Manhole Shaft On 102" RCP $~ $3,500.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 30. 2 EA Break Into Existing Catch Basin $550.001 $1,100.0'~'~ $1,000.00 $2,000.00 31. 5 EA P.C.C. Collar ~ 32. 4 EA Pipe Closure $~ $1,000.00 $5,000.00 33'~ --7 LS Backfill Existing RCB W/Slurry and Bulkhead Ends $600.00/ $2,400.012 $1,000.0'~-"~ $4,000.00 -- -- -- $~ $20,000.00 $20,000.00 34_~ 130~2 L~F Consh-uct 10' Wide x 7' H~.~,h Cast in Place RCB $1,200.001 $1,562,400.013 ~ 35.1 173 LF Constmctl0'Widex7'Hi_~.hPrecastRCB $1,700.001 $29'-~,100.00 $1,764.001 $305,172A)0 36. 188 LF Construct 8.5' Wide x HighPrecast RCB ~ $1,542.00 $289,896.00 37~. 18_~..__~ Lie Reinforced Concrete Top on Existi~ $350.00 $64,400.00 $450.00 $82,800.013 38. 4 EA Co_.~_.pressible Blanket Protection .... ~ 39-~ '-~4 E'--~ Conduit Su.~_.p2ort $1,650.00 $6,600.00 $1,000.00 $4,000.00 $550.00 $2,200.00 $2,000.0"~'~ $8,000.00 40.__: 1878 LF ~ l Garden Wall Com lete $235.001 $441,330.00 $180.00 $338,040.00 41. 22~ LF - · ' - · 42. ~ LF ~~ $210.00 $46,200.00 ------~ $500.00 $178,500.00 $300.0'~'~'~ $107,100.00 43~ 15.__~.1 LF. $315.00 $47,565.012 ~ $39,260.00 44. 550 LF 8" P.C.C. Curb ------~ $11.00t $6,050.00 ~ 45~ 4050 LF 8" P.C.C. Curb & 24" Gutter $12.001 $48,600.00 $16.001 $64,800.00 46._..~ ~4 E__.__~A 8'P.C.C. Busba ~ $11,000.0'---~---~~ 47. 3000~3 SF 4 P.C.C. S~dewal'"" ~ ~ ~" 'k ~ ~ --~ -- ~ $2.501 $75,000.00 $3.00 $90,000.00 48.~._a ~1 E._..~._A P.C.C. Wheel ChairRam (sin le) $500.00 $500. $800.01--1'~ $800.013 49~ ~2 E~A P.C.C. Wh~hair Ram dual ~ $900.0'~-~'"~ $1,800.00 $1,000.00 $2,000.0G 50~. ~1 L.___~S Bracin andShorin ~ $670,000.00 $670,000.00 $533,000.00 $533,000.00 ~SHEE'~'~-4'"~ ~ ~ BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING MARCH 29, 2005 Haven Avenue Street Widening and Storm Drain Improvement Project Steve Bubalo Construction From Base Line Road to North of 19th Street Belczak & Sons, Inc. Co. UNIT UNIT NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT 51. 1860 LF 102" RCP (1400D) with 1" additional cover over rebar ms $700.00 $1,302,000.013 $1,200.00 $2,232,000.00 52. 4 LF 66" RCP (1400D) $500.00 $2,000.00 $1,500.00 $6,000.00 53. 467 LF 60"RCP(2000D) $400.00 $186,800.00 $800.013 $373,600.00 54. 19 LF 54" RCP (1200D) $450.00i $8,550.00 $700.00 $13,300.00 55. 510 LF 48"RCP(3000D) $400.00 $204,000.00 $780.00 $397,800.00 56. 74 LF 36"RCP (1750D) $260.00 $19,240.00 $280.00 $20,720.013 57. 20 LF 33" RCP(1500D) $255.00 $5,100.00 $275.001 $5,500.00 58. 79 LF 24"RCP(2000D) $230.00 $18,170.00 $270.00 $21,330.00 59. 22 LF 21" RCP (2000D) $290.00 $6,380.00 $260.00 $5,720.00 60. 55 LF 18" RCP (3000D) $220.013 $12,100.0C' $250.00[ $13,750.00 61. 1 LS Install Street Lil~ht Conduit, Pull Rope, Pull Boxes and Str $80,000.00 $80,000.00 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 62 4425. LF Install 2" Interconnect Conduit with Pull Rope $20.00 $88,500.00 $20.00 $88,500.00 63. 13 EA Pull Boxes $400.00 $5,200.00 $150.00 $1,950.00 64. I 15 LF Install 3" Interconnect Conduit with Pull Rope $35.00 $4,025.00 $24.00 $2,760.0C 65. LS Traffic Signal and Lighting at Haven Avenue and Base Lin $200,000.00 $200,000.00 $185,000.001 $185,000.00 66. 1 LS Traffic Signal and Lighting at Haven Avenue and Victoria $190,000.00 $190,000.00 $185,000.00 $185,000.00 67. I LS Traffic Signal and Lighting at Haven Avenue and 19th Stre $200,000.00 $200,000.00 $190,000.00 $190,000.00 68. 402 EA InstallGround Cover 1 Gal. $6.00 $2,412.00 $10.00 $4,020.00 69. 2 EA Automatic irri~ation System (includin~ hot tap, service me $60,000.00 $120,000.00 $45,000.00 $90,000.00 70. 19078 SF SoilPreparation/FinalGrade $0.30 $5,723.40 $1.00 $19,078.00 71. 2 EA Maintenance Period $2,200.00 $4,400.0C $1,200.00 $2,400.00 72. 1856 EA Gal. Shrub $4.50 $8,352.00 $8.00 $14,848.00 73 76( EA 5 Gal. Shrub $15.00 $11,490.00 $14.00 $10,724.00 74. 29 EA '24" Box Tree $250.00 $7,250.00 $400.00 $l 1,600.00 75. 4 EA 15' BTF Tree $12,000.00 $48,000.00 $12,500.00 $50,000.00 76. 2 EA Relocate Existin~ Palm Tree $15,000.00 $30,000.00 $3,500.001 $7,000.00 77. 273 LF Concrete Header $6.00 $1,638.00 $18.00 $4,914.00 78. 23 EA Boulder 24" $90.00 $2,070.00 $130.00 $2,990.00 79. 20 EA Boulder36" $175.00 $3,500.00 $250.001 $5,000.00 80. 10 EA Boulder48" $300.00 $3,000.00 $450.001 $4,500.00 81. 2698 SF Cobble Pavinl~ $9.00 $24,282.00 $10.00 $26,980.00 82. 1270 SF Retardant Concrete Paving $10.00 $12,700.00 $5.00 $6,350.00 83. 337 SF Aggregate Finish Concrete $5.00 $1,685.0C $6.00 $2,022.00 84. I LS Traffic Signing, Striping Pavement Markin~ etc., compl~ $40,000.00 $40,000.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 85. LS Yraffic Control $170,000.00 $170,000.00 $100,000.001 $100,000.00 86. LS SWPPP $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $5,000.001 $5,000.0~ SHEET 4B TOTAL I $ 8,164,797.40 I $9,142,890.00 _HAVEN AVENUE STREET WIDENING AND STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS FROM BASE \ __ll~.o~L Ii-II-- FI~THILL LINE ROAD TO NORTH OF 19TH STREET 6TH ST 4TH ST