HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-167 - Resolutions RESOLUTION NO. 05-167
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO REVISE CITY-
WIDE TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT FEES FOR ALL
DEVELOPMENTS WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted
Ordinance No. 445 in March, 1991 creating and establishing the authority for imposing and
charging city-wide transportation development fees; and
WHEREAS, the Engineering Division is responsible for reviewing the continued
need for the described capital improvements, and revising the cost estimates and fees when
appropriate; and
WHEREAS, the revised cost estimates and fee calculations were available for
public inspection and review fourteen (14) days prior to this public hearing, and
WHEREAS, the 30-year extension of the Measure I half-cent transportation sales
tax was approved by voters of San Bernardino County on November 2, 2004, and a provision of
this ordinance requires that each local jurisdiction in San Bernardino County adopt a
development mitigation program that will address regional transportation needs; and
WHEREAS, the San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) has
prepared a nexus study to determine new development's fair share contribution for the
improvement of certain described regionally significant transportation projects, and local
jurisdictions are responsible for the collection of fees for the described projects that are located
within their jurisdiction, and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find
as follows:
A. The purpose of this fee is to finance transportation improvements needed to
mitigate the impacts of traffic generated by new development; and
B. The fees collected pursuant to this resolution shall be used to finance only
the public facilities described or identified in Exhibit "A", attached hereto; and
C. The construction of the described or identified public facilities are consistent
with the Circulation Element of the City's General Plan; and
D. That there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the described
public facilities, and the mitigation of traffic impacts associated with new
development; and
E. That there is also a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee
shown in Exhibit "B", and the type of development for which the fee is
charged; and
Resolution No. 05-167
Page 2 of 10
F. The cost estimates set forth in Exhibit "A" are reasonable cost estimates for
constructing these facilities, and the fees expected to be generated by new
development will not exceed the total of these costs.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does
hereby resolve as follows:
1. Definitions:
(a) "Development projects" shall mean construction of residential,
commercial, industrial, office, or other non-residential improvements, or
the addition of floor space to existing improvements. A "development
project' includes any project involving the issuance of a building permit for
construction or reconstruction.
(b) "Exempted development' shall mean a floor space addition to an existing
residential building, and the following types of uses: public schools,
colleges, libraries, churches, parks, county jail, or sports complex.
(c) "Equivalent dwelling unit' or "EDU", is used to convert all types of land
uses into an equivalent unit that enables Nexus fees to be tabulated as
dollars per EDU. One residential single family detached housing unit is
equal to one EDU.
2. Payment of fee: The Transportation Development Fee shall be paid upon
issuance of any building permit. The City Engineer shall determine the
amount of the fee based upon the size and type of development.
3. Fee Schedule: The amount of the Transportation Development Fee was
determined to be $3,658 per EDU. The calculations used to make this
determination are shown in the attached Exhibit "C.
4. EDU / Land Use Equivalent Schedule: The calculation of EDU for each
land use is based on the trip generation rates shown in the ITE Trip
Generation Manual, 5`h edition. The EDU for each identified land use type is
as follows:
Land Use Type EDU
Residential- Single Family Detached Unit 1.0 EDU
Residential- Multiple Family Attached Unit 0.6 EDU
Apartment or Condominium-Attached Unit 0.6 EDU
Senior Housing Attached Unit (Condo or Apartment) 0.2 EDU
Nursing/Congregate Care- per bed 0.2 EDU
Commercial- per 1,000 square feet 1.5 EDU
Office/Business Park- per 1,000 square feet 1.2 EDU
Industrial- per 1,000 square feet 0.6 EDU
Warehouse per 1,000 square feet 0.5 EDU
Hotel/Motel- per room 0.8 EDU
Day Care- per student 0.25 EDU
Self Storage- per unit 0.02 EDU
Service Station- per pump 5.0 EDU
Resolution No. 05-167
Page 3 of 10
5. Use of Fee: The Transportation Development Fee shall be solely used
to pay for the public facilities described in Exhibit "A", or for reimbursing the
City for development's fair share of those capital improvements already
constructed by the City, or to reimburse other developers who have
constructed public facilities described in Exhibit "A".
6. Administration Fee: The City shall include an Administration Fee in the
amount of 15% of the total project cost for the management of the
Transportation Fee Program.
7. Fee Review: The Engineering Division shall review the estimated cost of
the described capital improvements, the continued need for these
improvements, and the reasonable relationship between such need and the
traffic impacts of the various types of development pending or anticipated and
for which this fee is charged. The City Engineer shall report the findings to the
City Council at a noticed public hearing, and recommend any adjustment to
this fee or other action as may be needed.
8. Effective Date: This Resolution shall take effect sixty (60) days following
passage by the City Council.
9. Judicial Action to Challenge this Resolution: Any judicial action
proceeding to attack. Review. Set aside, void or annul this resolution shall be
brought within 120 days of its adoption.
Please see the following page
for formal adoption,certification and signatures
Resolution No. 05-167
Page 4 of 10
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 18'h day of May 2005.
AYES: Alexander, Gutierrez, Michael, Spagnolo, Williams
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAINED: None
William . Alexander/Mayor
ATTEST:
1
4eb4Jd s, MC, City Clerk
I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and
adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a Regular Meeting
of said City Council held on the 18`h day of May 2005.
Executed this 19`h day of May 2005, at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
}
ebra J. Ad C City Clerk
Resolution No. 05-167
Page 5 of 10
EXHIBIT"A"
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
TRANSPORTATION FEE PROGRAM PROJECTS AND PROJECT COSTS
March 21, 2005
Freeway Interchanges:
Base Line Road at 1-15 Freeway,widen NB and SB on-ramps= $200,000
(Total project cost=$950,000, Caltrans funds=$750,000.)
Foothill Boulevard at I-15 Freeway,widen NB and SB on-ramps= $650,000
(Total project cost=$1.4 million, Caltrans funds=$750,000.)
West Half of Base Line Road at 1-15 Freeway Interchange= $10,560,000
(Assuming the east half is built by the City of Fontana)
(Total construction cost=$16 million. ROW purchased by City RDA.
100%City of RC,New Development fair share percentage=66%)
Arrow Route at 1-15 Freeway Interchange= $15-080,000
(Total construction cost=$29 million,ROW purchased by City RDA.
New Development fair share percentage=52%)
Total= $26x490,000
Railroad Grade Separations and Crossings:
Haven Avenue at Metrolink Crossing $1,782,000
(Total Project Cost=$15,910,000,New Dev. Fair Share = 11%)
6'h Street, improve RXR crossing gates,west of Lucas Ranch= $300,000
6°'Street,install new RXR crossing gates,east of Santa Anita= $300,000
Hellman Ave, upgrade existing RXR crossing gates at 8'h $300,000
Total= $2,682,000
Bridges•
61h at Cucamonga Creek Channel (50% RC, 50% Ontario)_ $250,000
9'h at Cucamonga Creek Channel (widen)_ $250,000
Arrow Route at Etiwanda Ditch(widen existing bridge)_ $500,000
Banyan Street at Etiwanda Creek Channel(new)= $I,OD0,000
Hellman at Cucamonga Creek Channel(50%RC, 50%Ontario)— $500,000
Resolution No. 05-167
Page 6 of 10
Whitman Avenue at Etiwanda Ditch(new)_ $500,000
Wilson Avenue at Day Creek Channel(new)_ $1,000,000
Wilson Avenue at Etiwanda Creek Channel (new)_ $2,000,000
Total= $6,000,000
Streets:
6'h Street,Santa Anita to Etiwanda(backbone only)= 2,9001f $387,000
Arrow Route, Grove to Baker,widen 2 to 4 lanes= 1,8001£ $877,000
Arrow Route,widen south side 500 ft east of I-15 to 1,300 ft east=8001f $687,000
Banyan,Etiwanda to East, north side only= 1,500 if $569,000
Banyan Street,East Ave to Wardman/Bulloch(new alignment)= 4,500 If $5,278,000
Base Line Road,Etiwanda to I-15 Fwy, north side 2 to 3 lanes, = 400 If $331,000
Cherry Avenue,west side only, Wilson to I-15 Fwy. = 2,600 If $561,000
Church Street,Archibald to Haven,widen 2 to 4 lanes= 2,500 If $1,020,000
East Ave, I-15 to Victoria,various bottlenecks= 600 If $355,000
East Ave,Fire Station to Wilson,(new)= 1,300 If $797,000
East Ave,Wilson Avenue to North Rim Way(new) 500 If $139,000
Etiwanda Ave.,6th to Arrow Route,widen 2 to 4 lanes,= 3,000 If $2,864,000
Etiwanda Ave,Miller to 850 ft north of Miller,widen east side= 850 If $205,000
Etiwanda Ave,Banyan to Wilson,curb and gutter east side only= 2,500 If $949,000
Etiwanda Ave.existing northern terminus to North Rim Way(new) 500 if $189,000
Foothill Blvd,Vineyard to Hellman,widen 4 to 6 lanes= NA $200,000
Foothill Blvd.,Hellman to 700 ft east(north side only)= 2,700 If $225,000
Foothill Blvd at Archibald, widen intersection= LS $4,371,000
Foothill Blvd.,Archibald to Hermosa(4 to 6 lanes)= NA $1,266,000
Resolution No. 05-167
Page 7 of 10
Grove Avenue, 8`h to Tapia Via, widen east:side 1 to 2 lanes = 2,000 If $644,000
Grove Avenue,SanBem to Foothill,widen east side I to 2 lanes =470 If $404,000
Haven Avenue,Base Line to I-210 Fwy,west side only = 5,000 If $6,000,000
Crest Road(collector),Day Creek to East(new) 5,200 If $878,000
Miller Avenue,Etiwanda to East,widen 2 to 4lanes = 2,700 If $1,323,000
Milliken Ave, 5`h St to 700 ft south of 5'h,west side only= 700 If $194,000
Victoria St, east PL of EHS to I-15 Fwy,improve both shoulders=400 if $195,000
Vintage Drive,Etiwanda Avenue to 1300 It west(new)= 1,300 If $256,000
Wilson Avenue,Milliken to Day Creek Blvd,new.= 6,500 if $4,000,000
Wilson Avenue, Etiwanda Ave to East Avenue,(backbone only= 2,700 If $311,000
Wilson Avenue,East Avenue to Wardman/Blulloch, new 4,0001£ $3,155,000
Young's Canyon,Cherry Ave. to Wardman/lBulloch,new= 6,300 If $8,162,000
Total= $46,792,000
Summary:
Freeway Interchanges= $26,490,000
Railroad Crossings= $2,682,000
Bridges= $6,000,000
Streets= $46,792,000
Traffic signals, (56 each at$140,000)_ $7,840,000
Signal Interconnect System= $4,517,000
Total= $94,321,000
Funds currently in Transportation Developrment Fee Account= 420,000,000
Sub-Total = $74,321,000
Administration Fee(15%)_ $11,148,000
Total= $85,469,000
Resolution No. 05-167
Page 8 of 10
EXHIBIT "B"
TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT FEES
Updated: March,2005
Land Use Fee
Single Family Dwelling Unit(SFDU $3,658 per unit
Multi-family Dwelling Unit(MFDU) $2,195 per unit
Apartment $2,195 per unit
Senior Housing-Attached(Apartments or Condos) $732 per bedroom
Congregate Care Facility $732 per bed
Commercial Shopping Center $5,487 per 1000 sf
Industrial Park $2,195 per 1000 sf
Warehouse $1,829 per 1000 sf
Office/Business Park $4,390 per 1000 sf
Hotel/Motel $2,926 per room
Self Storage $73 per storage unit
Day Care $914 per student
Convenience Store with Gas Pumps $18,290 per gas pump
Resolution No. 05-167
Page 9 of 10
EXHIBIT"C"
TRANSPORTATION FEE PROGRAM UPDATE
March 21,2005
VACANT LAND as of February,2005
Vacant Residential Property=950 acres
• Single Family Dwelling Units(SFDU)= 5,363 units
• Multi-family Dwelling Units (MFDU)=5,248 units
Vacant Industrial Property=719 acres=31,319,640 sf
Assuming that the average floor area ratio for General Industrial is 0.5,then the future square ft
of industrial development is 31,319,640 X 0.5= 15,659,820 sq ft
Vacant Commercial Property =334 acres= 14,549,040 sf
Assuming that the average floor area ratio for General Commercial is 0.25, then the future square
It of commercial development is 14,549,040 X 0.25 =3,637,260 sf
EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS (EDU)PER LAND USE
Different types of land uses have different traffic trip generation rates. In order for nexus fees to
be tabulated for each type of land use,the "Equivalent Dwelling Units" or EDU for each type of
land use type must first be determined. The calculation of a particular land use type's EDU is
based on the traffic trip generation rate for that land use from the ITE Trip Generation Manual.
Per City Resolution 91-092,the EDU for various land uses was determined to be as follows:
Residential- Single Family Detached Unit 1.0 EDU
Residential-Multiple Family Attached Unit 0.6 EDU
Apartment or Condominium-Attached Unit 0.6 EDU
Senior Housing Attached Unit(Condo or Apartment) 0.2 EDU
Nursing/Congregate Care-per bed 0.2 EDU
Commercial-per 1,000 square feet 1.5 EDU
Office/Business Park-per 1,000 square feet 1.2 EDU
Industrial-per 1,000 square feet 0.6 EDU
Warehouse per 1,000 square feet 0.5 EDU
Hotel/Motel-per room 0.8 EDU
Day Care-per student 0.25 EDU
Service Station-per pump 5.0 EDU
Self Storage-per unit 0.02 EDU
Resolution No. 05-167
Page 10 of 10
TOTAL FUTURE EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS (EDU)
SFDU= 5,363 X 1.0 EDU=5,363 EDU
MFDU=5,248 X 0.6 EDU=3,149 EDU
Industrial = 15,659,820 sf X 0.6 EDU/1000 sf=9,396 EDU
Commercial=3,637,260 sf X 1.5 EDU/10X10 sf=5,455 EDU
Total Future EDU=23,363 EDU
CALCULATE COST PER EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNIT(EDU)
COST PER EDU=TOTAL COST OF PROJECTS/TOTAL NUMBER OF FUTURE EDU
Total Cost of Projects= $85,469,000
Total Future EDU=23,363
Cost per EDU=$3,658
CALCULATE TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT FEES BY LAND USE
Single Family Dwelling Unit(SFDU)= 1.0 EDU X$3,658=$3,658 per unit
Multi-family Dwelling Unit(MFDU)= 0.6 EDU X$3,658=$2,195 per unit
Apartment or Condominium-Attached Unit=0.6 EDU X$3,658=$2,195 per unit
Senior Housing-Attached(Apartments or Condos)=0.2 EDU X$3,658 =$732 per unit
Congregate Care Facility=0.2 EDU X$3,658=$732 per bed
Commercial Shopping Center= 1.5 EDU X$3,658=$5,487 per 1,000 sf
Industrial Park=0.6 EDU X$3,658=$2,195 per 1,000 sf
Warehouse= 0.5 EDU X$3,658= 1,829 per 1,000 sf
Office/Business Park= 1.2 EDU X$3,658=$4,390 per 1,000 sf
Hotel/Motel = 0.8 EDU per room X$3,658 =$2,926 per room
Self Storage=0.02 EDU per unit X$3,658=$73 per storage unit
Day Care=0.25 EDU per student X$3,658 =$914 per student
Convenience Store with Gas pumps=5.0 EDU per pump X $3,658= $18,290 per gas pump