Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout79-36 - Resolutions RESOLUTION NO. 79-36 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING C(R~MISSION APPROVING DIRECTOR REVIEW NO. 78-11 LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BLVD. · EAST OF VINEYARD AVENUE IN TE~ C-2 ZONE WHEREAS, on the 2nd day of April, 1979, a complete application was filed for review of the above described project; and WHEREAS, on the llth day of April, 1979, the Rancho Cucamonga Plan- ning Commission held a meeting to consider the above described project. NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COI~ISSION RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION l: That the following findings have been made: 1. That the site indicated by the development plan is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the pro- posed use, and all yards, spaces, walls, 'fences, parking, landscaping, loading and other features required by this section. 2. That the improvements as indicated on the develop- ment plan are located in such a manner as to be properly related to existing and proposed streets '~ and highways. 3. That the improvements as shown on the development plan are consistent with all adopted standards and policies as set forth in this section. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on April ll, 1979. SECTION 3: That Director Review No. 78-11 is approved subject to the following conditions: Applicant shall contact the Planning Division for compliance with the following conditions: 1. Compliance with all zoning ordinance provisions. 2. The site shall be developed in accordance with the approved site plan on file in the Planning Division and conditions adopted by the Planning Commission. 3. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. The applicant shall maintain all landscaped areas in a healthy and thriving condition, free from weed, trash and debris. 5. Any roof mounted equipment shall be screened from view from all adjacent properties. Screening material shall blend with the architectural feature of the buildings. 6. The monument sign as proposed is not approved. The sign shall be redesigned and resubmitted to the Planning Com- mission for their review and approval. 7. Any signs that may be placed on the building or direc- tional signs that may be placed on the site shall first be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division. 8. The detailed site plan shall be revised in accordance with the illustrative site plan and submitted to the Planning Division for its files. 9. Parking lot lights shall not exceed 12' from'finished grade and shall not create glare to adjacent properties. t0. This approval shall become null and void if building permits are not issued for this project within one year from the date of this approval. 11. That the staff will review the landscaping to ensure the continuation along the entire frontage of the site and an additional buffer to the rear of the property. Applicant shall contact the Engineering Division for com- pliance with the following conditions: 12. Ail exterior street improvements shall be constructed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, prior to occupancy. 13. The following missing street improvements shall be con- structed which include, but are not limited to, sidewalks, driveways, wheel chair ramps, curb and gutter, street paving, street trees, street lights, drainage structures. 14. Street improvement plans prepared on standard size sheets by a registered Civil Engineer shall be submitted for approval by the City Engineer. 15. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing that the west driveway be combined with the driveway for the property to the west as approved by the City Engineer. 16. Street striping and signing shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 17. Ail damaged off site public works facilities, including parkway trees, shall be repaired prior to occupancy to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. i8. Ail street structural sections shall be submitted to, ~and approved by the City Engineer. 19. Grading of subject property shall be in accordance with a soils report and plan prepared by a qualified engineer and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 20. Drainage facilities and easements shall be provided to the specifications of the City Engineer. 21~ Water supply and sanitary sewer facilities shall be provided to the specifications of the Cucamonga County Water District. Written verification that all require- ments have been met shall be supplied at the time of building permit application. 22. Prior to the issuance of building permits for combustible construction, evidence shall be submitted to the Fire Chief that water supply for fire protection is avail- able. 23. All proposed utilities within the project shall be installed underground. 24. Developer shall coordinate and pay for, the relocation of any power poles or other existing public utilities, as required. 25. This development falls within those areas indicated as subject to flooding under the National Flood Insurance Program and will be subject to the provisions of said program. Applicant shall contact the Building Division for compliance with the following: 26~ Ail plans shall prepared in conformance with the UBC, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electrical Code, and all other applicable codes in effect at the time of 'building permit issuance. Applicant shall contact the Foothill Fire District for compliance with the following: 27. All requirements of the Foothill Fire District shall be met. Applicant shall contact the Cucamonga County Water District for compliance with the following: 28. Ail requirements of the Cucamonga County Water District shall be met. APPROVED A~D ADOPTED THIS llTH DAY OF APRIL, 1979 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Herman R~el,~Chai~ an ~ Secretary of the!Planning Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga at a regular meeting of the Planning Com- mission held on the llth day of April, 1979 by the following vote to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: DAHL, TOLSTOY, JONES, REMPEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: GARCIA ABSENT: CO~ISSIONERS: NONE