Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout00-45 - Resolutions RESOLUTION NO. 00-45 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED VARIANCE NO. 96-02, FOR THE FOLLOWING: 1) REDUCE THE MINIMUM AREA REQUIREMENT FOR THE USE OF OPTIONAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, 2) REDUCE THE REAR YARD SETBACK ALONG THE NORTH AND WEST PROJECT BOUNDARY, 3) REDUCE THE BUILDING-TO-CURB SETBACK, 4) REDUCE THE BUILDING-TO-BUILDING SEPARATION, 5) REDUCE THE AVERAGE AND MINIMUM LANDSCAPE SETBACK ALONG CARNELIAN STREET, 6) REDUCE THE PARKING STREETSCAPE SETBACK, AND 7) INCREASE THE WALL HEIGHT ALONG THE NORTH AND WEST PROJECT BOUNDARY FOR A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION AND DESIGN REVIEW OF 27 SINGLE FAMILY HOMES ON 3.35 ACRES, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF CARNELIAN STREET AT VIVERO STREET IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 207-022-54 AND 64. A. Recitals. 1. G & D Construction has filed an application for the extension of the approval of Variance 96-02, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Variance time extension request is referred to as "the application." 2. On March 25, 2000, this Commission adopted its Resolution No. 98-22, thereby approving, subject to specific conditions and time limits, Variance 98-22. 3. On the 10th day of May 2000, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on May 10, 2000, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The previously approved Variance is in substantial compliance with the City's current General Plan, specific plans, ordinances, plans, codes, and policies; and b. The extension of the Variance approval will not cause significant inconsistencies with the current General Plan, specific plans, ordinances, plans, codes, and policies; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 00-45 VAR 96-02 — G & D CONSTRUCTION May 10, 2000 Page 2 C. The extension of the Variance approval is not likely to cause public health and safety problems; and d. The extension is within the time limits established by State law and local ordinance. 3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby grants a time extension for: Application Applicant Expiration Variance 96-02 G&D Construction March 25, 2003 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby modifies the conditions of approval contained in Resolution 98-22, incorporated herein by this reference, to read as follows: Plannina Division 1) The applicant shall agree to defend, at his sole expense, any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees, may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate, at its own expense, in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve the applicant of his obligations under this condition. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF MAY 2000. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA t BY: Larry cNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Bra Secre I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of May 2000, by the following vote-to-wit: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 00-45 VAR 96-02 —G & D CONSTRUCTION May 10, 2000 Page 3 AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS, TOLSTOY