Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2005/08/17 - Agenda Packet
~500 Civic Cen~er Drive k ~ancho Cucamonga, C~ 9~730-3801 . AGENDAS ~EGULAI~ I~IEETIINGS fist and 3rd Wednesdays + 7:00 p.m. AGENC¥~ ~OA~ ~ CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS William J. Alexander .................... Mayor Diane Williams ............... Mayor Pro Tern Rex Gutierrez ............................ Member L. Dennis Michael ..................... I~lember Sam Spagnolo .......................... Member Jack Lam ......................... CRy Manager James L. ltflar~man ............. City Attorney Debra J. Adams ..................... City Clerk ([])]~E~ O]F ~USIINESS 5:30 {p.m. Closed Session ................... Tapia Conference Room 7:00 p.m. Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting... Council Chambers [~e~ular Fire Protection District ii,leering ... Council Chambers Regular City Council Meeting ............. Council Chambers INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC ,,~NCHO ~UC~ONC, A TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL The City Council encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the Agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokespersen may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the City Council on any agenda item. Please sign in on the clipboard located at the desk behind the staff table. It is important to list your name, address and phone number. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under "Public Communications". There is opportunity to speak under this section at the beginning and the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the City Council should be given to the City Clerk for distribution. To address the City Council, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. All items to be placed on a City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, one week prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's office receives all such items. AGENDA BACK-UP MATERIALS Staff reports and back-up materials for agenda items are available for review at the City Clerk's counter and the Public Library. A complete copy of the ~genda is also available at the sign in desk located behind the staff table during the Council meeting. LIVE BROADCAST Council meetings are broadcast live on Channel 3 for those with cable television access. Meetings are rebroadcast on the second and fourth Wednesdays of each month at 11:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. The City has added the option for customers without cable access to view the meetings "on-demand" from their computers. The added feature of "Streaming Video On Demand" is available on the City's website at www.ci.rancho- cucamonga.ca.us/whatsnew.htm for those with Hi-bandwidth (DSl_/Cable Modem) or Low-bandwidth (Dial-up) Intemet service. The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers Located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Members of the City Council also sit as the Redevelopment Agency and the Fire District Board. Copies of City Council agendas and minutes can be found at http:llwww, ci. rancho-cucamonga, ca. us ~ If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please L~ contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477-2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the ~,~ meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. ~ Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. , CITY COUNCIL AGENDA AUGUST 17, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY 1 I~CHO HALL, 10500 Civic CENTER DRIVE (~UC.~MONGA 1. Roll Call: Alexander__, Gutierrez__, Michael__, Spagnolo__, and Williams__. II ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS ] 1. Presentation of a Proclamation and City Plaque to Brad Buller, City Planner, in recognition of his years of service to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2. Update on the Cultural Center Project and Presentation of Donation from Bank of America Foundation to the City Council in support of the Performing Arts and Literacy (PAL) Campaign for the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center. 3. Update on the West Nile Virus. 4. Presentation of a check to benefit the Inland Empire Pacific Electric Trail Project. This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting: Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. D. CONSENT CALENDAR I The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember or member of the audience for discussion. 1. Approval of Minutes: July 20, 2005 August 3, 2005 (Gutierrez & Michael absent) 2. Approval of Warrants, Register 7/27/05 through 8/9/05, and Payroll 1 ending 8/9/05, for the total amount of $5,314,600.63. 3. Approve to receive and file current Investment Schedules ending June 29 30, 2005, and July 31,2005. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA AUGUST 17, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO RE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY C~[~CHO HALL, i 0500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE UCAMONGA 4. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for 41 the construction of the Archibald Pavement Rehabilitation from Base Line Road to 19th Street, to be funded from Acct. No. 11763035650/1371176-0 (Measure 'T' funds). RESOLUTION NO. 05-236 43 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "ARCHIBALD AVENUE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM BASE LINE ROAD TO 19TM STREET" IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS 5. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Base Line Pavement Rehabilitation from Hermosa Avenue to 48 Valencia Avenue, to be funded from Acct. No. 11763035650/1469176-0. RESOLUTION NO. 05-237 51 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "BASE LINE ROAD PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM HERMOSA AVENUE TO VALENCIA AVENUE" IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS 6. Approval of plans, specifications and estimates and to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Beryl Park Sports Field 56 Screen Construction, to be funded from Acct. No. 11203055650/133512-0. RESOLUTION NO. 05-238 59 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "BERYL PARK SPORTS FIELD SCREEN CONSTRUCTION" IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS 7. Approval !o appropriate funds received from the U.S. Department of 64 Health and Human Services/Administration on Aging for a Grant in the amount of $146,866 for the implementation of a Senior Wellness and Transportation Program (Fund 1270401 ). CITY COUNCIL AGENDA AUGUST 17, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD In THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY c~CHO HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE UCAMONGA 8. Approval to purchase three (3) computer servers from GSTI, utilizing a 66 U.S. Communities Competitively Bid Contract in the amount of $39,876 from Acct. No. 1016301-5605. 9. Approval of Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services 67 Update. 10. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to landscape Maintenance District No. 2 and 77 Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. t and 3 for DRC2003- 00719, located on the northeast 'corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Highland Avenue, submitted by Pacific Globe, Inc., a California Corporations. RESOLUTION NO. 05-239 80 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND iMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DRC2003-00719 RESOLUTION NO. 05-240 81 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 3 FOR DRC2003-00719 11. Approval of a Professional Services Agreement extension with Astrum Utility Services (CO 05-080) in the amount of $30,000 for utility billing 89 services funded from Acct. No. 1705303-5309, Municipal Utility Account. 12. Approval to execute a Professional Services Agreement with Michael Brandman Associates (CO 05~081), not to exceed $64,500 for the 91 preparation of a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (DRC2005-01204) for the North Eastern Sphere Annexation Project in the Rancho Cucamonga's Sphere of Influence, and for the authorization to re-appropriate $66,000 out of AB1600 Reserves into Acct. No. 1016301-5300 (Contract Services) in connection with the City/County initiated annexation. 13. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 16113, '~28 located on the southwest corner of Wilson and East Avenue, submitted by Trimark Pacific Rancho Cucamonga, LLC. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA AUGUST 17, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY 4 ..~,'c[~o HALL, 10500 Civic CENTER DRIVE __~,jUCAMONGA RESOLUTION NO. 05-2~41 131 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 16113 14. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 16430, 132 located on the west side of Archibald Avenue between Wilson Avenue and Hillside Road, submitted by Archibald Ventures, LLC. RESOLUTION NO. 05-242 135 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 16430 15. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Cash Deposit and file a Notice of 136 Completion for improvements for DRC2002-00884, located on the south side of 6~h Street, east of Utica Avenue, submitted by F & F Simon Rancho Tech, LLC. RESOLUTION NO. 05-243 138 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2002-00884 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 16. Approval to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 139 14497, located on the west side of Bluegrass Avenue, south of Wilson Avenue, submitted by Standard Pacific Corporation. 17. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for 141 improvements for Tract 16157, located at the northwest corner of Church Street and Terra Vista Parkway, submitted by Concours Development co., LLC & LDC Cougar, LLC. RESOLUTION NO. 05-244 143 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 16157 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA AUGUST 17, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY C~N'CHO HALL, 10500 Civic CENTER DRIVE UCAMONGA 18. Approval to accept the Improvements, release the Faithful 144 Performance Bond and file a Notice of Completion for Improvements for Tract 16370, Traffic Signal Construction, located at Church Street and Arbor Lane, submitted by Standard PacificNictoria Arbors, LLC. RESOLUTION NO. 05-245 146 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 16370 TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONSTRUCTION AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non- controversial. The Council will act upon them at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion. 1. CONSIDERATION OF SECOND READING OF AN ORDINANCF REPEALING COUNCIL ACTIONS IN REFERENCE TO THF ETIWANDA CREEK PROJECT IN CONFORMANCE WITH THF SUPERIOR COURT JUDGMENT, CASE NO. RVC 081807 ORDINANCE NO. 747 (second reading) 147 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING ITS ORDINANCE NO. 728 g. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS I The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. 1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODF AMENDMENT DRC2003-01144 - CITY OF RANCHO 148 CUCAMONGA - A request to amend Section 17.16.030 use regulations to allow public storage facilities, including outdoor RV parking, in the Utility Corridor District. Related files: Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-01130 and Preliminary Review DRC2002-00704. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. (CONTINUED FROM JULY 20, 2005) _~ CITY COUNCIL AGENDA AUGUST 17, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY c[~Cao HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE UCAMONGA ORDINANCE NO. 746 (first reading) 285 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2003-01144, A REQUEST TO AMEND SECTION 17.16.030 USE REGULATIONS TO ALLOW PUBLIC STORAGE FACILITIES, INCLUDING OUTDOOR RV PARKING, IN THE UTILITY CORRIDOR DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2005-00078 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA/SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON - Consideration '148 of a Memorandum of Understanding for the use of Southern California Edison Utility Corridors for recreational trail use and some commerciar/industrial uses in selected areas as allowed by the General Plan. (CONTINUED FROM JULY 20, 2005) The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. No Items Submitted. H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS I The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. 1. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF 289 THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE 2005/2010 MEASURE 'T' FIVE-YEAR CAPITAl IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AND TWENTY-YEAR TRANSPORTATION PLAN BEGINNING IN FISCAL YEAR 2005/06, AS REQUIRED FOR MEASURE 'T' FUND,C; (CONTINUED FROM AUGUST 3, 2005) CITY COUNCIL AGENDA AUGUST 17, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD I. THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY 7 cRANcHO HALL, 10500 C~V~C CENTER DRIVE UCAMONGA RESOLUTION NO. 05-234 291 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE 2005/2010 MEASURE 'T' FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AND TWENTY- YEAR TRANSPORTATION PLAN BEGINNING IN FISCAL YEAR 2004/05 FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF MEASURE "1" FUNDS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. 1. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Councilmember.) 2. DESIGNATION OF A VOTING REPRESENTATIVE AND AN 297 ALTERNATE FOR THE LEAGUE OF CITIES ANNUAL MEETING 3. DISCUSSION OF TOWN HALL MEETING FOR PUBLIC SAFETY (Oral) 4. CONSIDERATION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 300 STATEMENT OF GOALS AND POLICIES FOR THE USE OF THF MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES ACT OF 1987 J. ADJOURNMENT ] i, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on August 11, 2005, seventy two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. July 20, 2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Reqular Meetinq II A. CALL TO 0RDER I A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, July 20, 2005, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor William J. Alexander called the meeting to order at 7:33 p.m. Present were Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, L. Dennis Michael, Sam Spagnolo, Diane Williams and Mayor William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Director; Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director; Charles Scott, Sr. Information Systems Specialist; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Jim Harris, Associate Engineer; Brad Buller, City Planner; Larry Henderson, Principal Planner; Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director; Dave Moore, Recreation Superintendent; Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III; Captain Pete Ortiz, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; Chief Peter Bryan, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Kimberly Thomas, Management Analyst III; Fabian Villenas, Management Analyst II; Kathy Scott, Deputy City Clerk; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. Il B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS B1. Presentation in recognition of County Supervisor Paul Biane for his ongoing commitment to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. This item was done during the Redevelopment Agency meeting. B2. Presentation of a Proclamation to SCAG in recognition of 40 years of dedicated service to the Southern California Region. Mayor Alexander and the City Council presented the Proclamation to Rich Macias, Manager of Transportation Planning with SCAG. B3. Presentation of a Proclamation to Children's Network for their "Fun in the Sun, Safe Summer." Mayor Alexander and the City council presented the Proclamation to Shirley Simmons, Child Abuse Coalition Team Member. B4. Presentation of Certificates of Recognition to donors and sponsors of the "Ron Ives Bicycle Rodeo." Deputy Greg Hill presented a power point abOut the program. He then assisted the City Council with the presentation of the certificates to the donors and sponsors of this program. B5. Announcement by the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society's Team in Training Program. Mel Hill, Coach for Team in Training with the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society, stated he had been to a City Council meeting about three months ago. He reported on the progress made by the team that is conditioning and running for the marathon. He stated they have a meeting set for tomorrow night at 6:30 p.m. at the Lions Park Community Center on Base Line Road to prepare for the winter marathon. He stated leukemia is making progress and getting cured, but there is still work to do. He stated he can be contacted at 886-9257 for more information. City Council Minutes July 20, 2005 Page 2 Ii II c. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS I C1. John Lyons commented on the fun at the recent bicycle rodeo and how important it is to the kids. He stated it really does teach the kids bicycle safety. He commented on the swimming pool safety and how important that was. He told how people should take care of themselves while out in the heat and to be prepared while driving in the heat also. C2. Mark Davidson of Margarita Beach stated the Planning Commission recently voted to modify his Conditional Use Permit (CUP) and Entertainment Permit. He stated these changes are so severe that they will cause his business to close should they be allowed to be enacted. He stated he has never had a complaint filed against his business nor been'cited by the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board or any other City or County department ever. He stated the complaints were forwarded to the Planning Commission for discussion; and that after the meeting concluded, his hours were limited, which he felt would put him out of business. He asked that the City Council place on the agenda his request to order the Planning Commission to reconsider their decision based on two errors made by the Planning Department staff. He stated the first error is staffs interpretation of his CUP that he was only allowed to have "entertainment incidental to the restaurant and bar." He stated that is incorrect. He stated it is the wording of staff that caused the Planning Commission to vote as they did. He stated the second error he wanted to point out is that after staffs report of his business that included very minor changes to his CUP, the Planning Commission directed staff to come up with more strict conditions. Staff was supposed to discuss these conditions with him and make him a part of this process because they felt he earned the right to be part of this. He stated he had sent many emails to the planning staff and that his emails were not answered. He stated he did not receive much of a warning before this was heard by the Planning Commission. He stated he is not here to lay blame, but asked that the City Council look into this matter and send it back to the Planning Commission for further consideration. James Markman, City Attorney, stated the Planning Commission did adopt a Resolution to effect these changes, which was their final action. He stated Mr. Davidson has ten days to file an appeal no later than next Monday, and if he doesn't, the Council will have lost jurisdiction on this matter and those condition changes will be effected. He stated the only process Mr. Davidson will be left with is to apply for another process where the conditions are changed or modified in a different way. He stated if there is no appeal filed, the Planning Commission decision stands and will be in a mandate action almost immediately. C3. James Reese, Attorney for Mr. Davidson and long time resident, stated they would like to continue communications and will be filing an appeal by Monday. He stated they are here tonight to communicate with the City Council and staff. He asked when the appeal is filed, the fee is paid, Counsel is retained, there will be a time when everyone sits down to resolve this short of a City Council meeting. He stated they want to keep all communication lines open. He mentioned the conditions that were placed on Mr. Davidson and the significance of them. He stated they are present to inform the City Council of their position. He stated they are not here to go around the appeal process. James Markman, City Attorney, stated there is never any implication that staff will not talk to an applicant and commented on the appeal process again. C4. Nicole Myerchin commented on the meeting regarding public safety from last week. She stated this week she thought there would be an item on the agenda to discuss the attrition fees to be paid for the County, but that it is not on there. She stated she has been tracking the jobs that are available in the County and felt these positions should be considered by the City Council when considering the attrition City Council Minutes July 20, 2005 Page 3 fees. She stated the animal shelter is still not in compliance with the law. She stated animals are being euthanized in front of other animals and that this should not be occurring. She felt there should be a public commission to help with this process. She commented on the job description for the animal shelter director position and wished it would focus more on a person wanting a no kill shelter instead of eight years experience. She stated she is looking forward to the transition discussion. C5. Jim Moffit resident of Rancho Cucamonga felt Ms. Myerchin is right and felt the City should take back the shelter. He felt after we take it back, we could at that time work on making it a no kill shelter. He stated the people he has talked to feel the salary for the director's position is too high. He asked why there isn't a head hunter locally working on this instead of going with someone out of the area to find applicants for the director position. He stated he did not understand why the County wants the transition fees. C6. Bill McCliman stated he wanted to talk about a Daily Bulletin article from the July 19th newspaper. He stated he agreed with the author of the article, which said safety should have been considered before allowing all of the building to occur. He stated he does not condone the behavior of what is going on in people's yards of those that are going to Margarita Beach. He stated the Planning Commission gave the owner a CUP to have his business there and felt maybe the business should be moved to another area. He stated something should be done so that he does not have to have his business shut down and felt there should be a better plan to help him. He felt everyone should keep the communication going. He hoped the City will not pay the County the transition fees for the animal shelter and felt it was a waste of taxpayer dollars. He felt the City should help Mr. Davidson find another site for his business so he does not lose his business. C7. Tony Mize, Vice Chairman of the Community Foundation and Chair of the PAL Campaign, commented on the past event at the Cultural Center where the steel was topped off. He stated there has been a $500,000 dgnation by the Bank of America. He stated Hank Stickney of the Quakes recently gave $50,000. He stated their goal has been $2,000,000, and that this has now been raised to $5,000,000. He stated as of last Friday they have raised over $3,100,000. He thanked people for supporting the Cultural Center. [I D. CONSENT CALENDAR I D1. Approval of Minutes: June 2, 2005 (special meeting) June 9, 2005 (special meeting) June 15, 2005 (Spagnolo absent) June 16, 2005 (special meeting - Spagnolo absent) July 6, 2005 (special meeting) D2. Appr~va~ ~f warrants~ Register N~s. 6/3~~~5 thr~ugh 7~12~~5 and Payr~~~ ending 7~12~~5 f~r the t~ta~ amount of $2,223,479.66. D3. Approval of a request from American Youth Soccer Organization (AYSO) Region 65 for a Waiver of Fees and Charges for use of the soccer fields at the Rancho Cueamonga Epicenter Adult Sports Complex on September 10, 2005, for their picture day. D4 Approval of the Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update. D5. Approval of a payment in the amount of $4,315,000 to the County of San Bernardino Flood Control District that will serve to transfer the Regional Mainline Drainage Fees collected by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as provided for in Agreement No. CO 02-139 to meet the City's funding obligation for the Upper Etiwanda Creek Improvement Project, and approval of an appropriation of $4,315,000 to Account No. 11143035650/1358-0 from the Drainage Etiwanda/San Sevaine (Fund 114) fund balance. City Council Minutes July 20, 2005 Page 4 D6. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for removal and replacement of Grand Prix Fire damaged fencing located along the Skyline, Monroe Canyon, David and Hermosa Easement Community Equestrian Trails. RESOLUTION NO. 05-223 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT OF GRAND PRIX FIRE DAMAGED FENCING LOCATED ALONG THE SKYLINE, MONROE CANYON, DAVIS AND HERMOSA EASEMENT COMMUNITY EQUESTRIAN TRAILS AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK DT. Approval to accept the Base Line Road at the 1-15 Traffic and Street Improvements (CO No. 03-128) as Complete, approval to appropriate $22,000.03 to Account No. 11243035650/1283124-0 from Transportation Fund Balance, retain the Faithful Performance Bond as a Guarantee Bond, release Labor and Material Bond and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $496,330.03. RESOLUTION NO. 05-224 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE BASE LINE ROAD AT THE 1-15 TRAFFIC AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS, CONTRACT NO. 03-128 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK DS. Approval to accept the Hermosa Avenue Street Widening and Pavement Rehabilitation from Highland Avenue to Banyan Street, (CO No. 05-011) as complete, retain the Faithful Performance Bond as a Guarantee Bond, release the Labor and Material Bond and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $243,288.70. RESOLUTION NO. 05-225 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE HERMOSA AVENUE STREET WIDENING AND PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM HIGHLAND AVENUE TO HERMOSA AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. 05- 011 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D9. Approval to release the Faithful Performance Bond No. 6205444 in the amount of $36,674.00, for the Modification of Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at Archibald Avenue and 19t" Street, Contract No. 03- 067. D10. Approval to release the Faithful Performance Bond No. SU 500-6064 in the amount of $78,868.00, for the Highland Avenue Landscape Improvements East of Day Creek Boulevard, Contract No. 04-019. Dll. Approval to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond No. 92929 9798 in the amount of $15,985.52, for the 2003/2004 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation - Slurry Seal of Various Streets, Contract No. 03-068. D12. Approval to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 16334, located at the southeast corner of Rochester Avenue and the Southern Pacific Railroad Right-of-Way submitted by Richmond American Homes of California, Inc. D13. Approval to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 14496, located north of Wilson Avenue on the west side of Day Creek Boulevard submitted by Granite Homes. City Council Minutes July 20, 2005 Page 5 D14. Approval of a Contract Amendment and additional appropriation for RJM Design Group in the amount of $152,575 into account number 11203055300, purchase order number 46655 and for Dan Guerra and Associates in the amount of $59,755 into account number 11203055650/1343120-0, purchase order number 47724 to be funded from Fund 120 Fund Balance due to contractor related delays and additional work required for the Central Park SeniodCommunity Center Project. Delay related costs will be recovered from the project contractor. D15. Approval and authorization to execute a Professional Services Agreement with Butsko Utility Design, Inc., (CO 05-072) for electrical system planning and continued mechanical electrical engineering support within the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility Service Area to be funded from 17053035309. D16. Approval of an Agreement between the County of San Bernardino (CO 05-073) and the City of Rancho Cucamonga to reimburse the City for erosion control measures north of the Barret Basin, appropriate $45,782 from General Fund to Account No. 10013075650/1501001-0 and authorize the additional award to Grand Pacific Contractors, Contract 05-009, in the amount of $45,782. D17. Approval of Map, Monumentation Cash Deposit, and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 for Pamel Map 16565, located on the west side of Hermosa Avenue, north of Victoria Street, submitted by Vernon Morrison. RESOLUTION NO. 05-226 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP 16565, AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT RESOLUTION NO. 05-227 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR PARCEL MAP 16565 D18. Approval of a Map, Parcel Map 16714, located at the terminus of Charles Smith Avenue, south of San Marino Drive, submitted by Cecil R. Carney and Cathy A. Carney, and Shueri I. Yaghi. RESOLUTION NO. 05-228 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP 16714 D19. Approval of the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 3B and Street Lighting maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, and 6 for Tract 16648, located on the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and the 210 Freeway Eastbound On-Ramp Submitted by Aim All Storage 210, LLC. RESOLUTION NO. 05-229 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, AND 6 FOR TRACT MAP NO. 16648 D20. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security Cash Deposit for public street improvements and Development Review Project DRC2002-1023, located on the southwest corner of Arrow Route and White Oak Avenue, submitted by Stor-N-Lock Partners #18, LLC. City Council Minutes July 20, 2005 Page 6 RESOLUTION NO. 05-230 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY CASH DEPOSIT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROJECT DRC2002-01023 D21. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security Cash Deposit, for public street improvement, and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for Development Review Project DRC2002-00864, located on the west side of White Oak Avenue north of Elm Avenue, submitted by Allyn B. Scheu and The L. & J. Scheu Living Trust. RESOLUTION NO. 05-231 A RESOLUTIQN OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHQ CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY CASH DEPOSIT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROJECT DR2002-00864 RESOLUTION NO. 05-232 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROJECT DRC2002-00864 Motion: Moved by Michael, seconded by Williams to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports contained within the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. E. CONSENT ORDINANCES [ El. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2005 00107 - RANCHO CUCAMONGA HOUSING PARTNERS, LP - A request to change the zoning designation from General Commercial to park for 3.36 acres of land located on the east side of Madrone Avenue, between Sandalwood Court and Richwood Drive and to change the land use designation from General Industrial (Subarea. 1)th to Medium Resident. a (8-14 dwelling units per acre) for 5.54 acres of land, located on the north s~de of 9 Street, approximately 600 feet east of Madrone Avenue - APN: 0207-262- 18 (portion of) and 27. Related files: General Plan Amendment DRC2005-00106, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17156, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17455, and Development Review DRC2005-00220. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 745. City Council Minutes July 20, 2005 Page 7 ORDINANCE NO. 745 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2005-00107, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE ZONING DESIGNATION FROM GENERAL COMMERCIAL TO PARK FOR 3.36 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF MADRONE AVENUE, BETWEEN SANDALWOOD COURT AND RICHWOOD DRIVE, AND TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM GENERAL INDUSTRIAL (SUBAREA 1) TO MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 5.54 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 9TM STREET, APPROXIMATELY 600 FEET EAST OF MADRONE AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0207-262- 18 (PORTION OF) AND 27 MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Gutierrez to waive full reading and approve Ordinance No. 745. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. F, ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS I Fl. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2003-01144 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend Section 17.16.030 use regulations to allow public storage facilities, including outdoor RV parking, in the Utility Corridor District. Related files: Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-01130 and Preliminary Review DRC2002-00704. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ORDINANCE NO. 746 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2003-01144, A REQUEST TO AMEND SECTION 17.16.030 USE REGULATIONS TO ALLOW PUBLIC STORAGE FACILITIES, INCLUDING OUTDOOR RV PARKING, IN THE UTILITY CORRIDOR DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2005-00078 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA/SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON - Consideration of a memorandum of Understanding for the use of Southern California Edison Utility Corridors for recreational trail use and some commercial/industrial uses in selected areas as allowed by the General Plan. A staff report was presented by Larry Henderson, Principal Planner. Councilmember Michael asked if the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) and the Development Code Amendment are both necessary. Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, stated yes and further explained this. Mayor Alexander opened the public for public hearing. Addressing the Ci[y Council were: City Council Minutes July 20, 2005 Page 8 Darin Knowles of Rancho Cucamonga stated he does have a problem with the MOU. He stated he is not concerned with the storage facility, but that he is concerned with the rails-to-trails. He felt this is being hid by SANBAG and the City. He felt this needed to be addressed. He stated he does not need a train running behind his house. Mayor Alexander stated this has always been a transportation corridor, but that it is not really likely that it will have a train going through there. Mr. Knowles felt more information needs to go out about the rails-to-trails project. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he is concerned about the disclosure that people get from developers when purchasing their homes. Councilmember Williams asked Mr. Knowles to sign in so when there are meetings about rails-to-trails he would be notified. Kathy Munson stated she attended the Planning Commission meeting. She stated this was disclosed to them by the developer who stated the light rail was very insignificant. She stated they are very concerned about the value of their homes and felt it could go down if the light rail goes in. She stated she would rather this transportation corridor be used to allow for exercise purposes. She stated they are not in favor of the storage facility because it tends to draw crime to it. She felt the homeowners' concerns should be considered and protected. Mark Voss, resident on Saxon Drive, stated he is a neighbor of Mr. Knowles. He also commented on the disclosures for the use of the utility corridor. He stated he has talked with staff to see what is planned for the open space near his home. He felt there needs to be open space, and if there is room for a storage facility there should be space for a park. He asked that plain language in the disclosure statements be used for any future notices that will be easy to understand. He stated the light rail also concerns him and that he would not have purchased his home if he had known that. He stated he does not want a train behind his house. He asked that the City Council work with SANBAG on this matter. Marina Hawk, resident in the City, asked that the City Council reconsider the Planning Commission's decision to allow for a change of zoning. She did not feel this should be changed and did not want the RV's parked behind their home. She felt something should go in there where the kids can play. She felt there should be something that looks nice and green. She stated the City Council is their last hope to get a decision that will help them. John Lyons of Etiwanda area stated he would like to see the trail go in. He stated it was always known there would be an open are for a possible train to go through. He felt storage facilities are important for people to be able to store their RV. He did not think there should be a park developed under the Edison corridor. Mike Orduno with Southern California Edison stated he is here to answer any questions anyone might have. He stated he has met with some of the residents to address their concerns. He stated they are not associated with the light rail at all. He stated all of their facilities have Edison's name on it and that they are all state of the art. He stated they have patrol systems. Councilmember Michael asked if Edison has plans of selling this. Mr. Orduno stated these are long-term ground leases. He commented on the state of the art facilities these would be. Bill McCliman stated years ago he had contacted Edison about doing this same thing and was told they didn't do this. He wondered if Edison lied to him in the past or have things changed. City Council Minutes July 20, 2005 Page 9 Mr. Orduno stated he was not sure why that answer was previously given. He stated they have been working on this project for about three years and have many more facilities to come. He stated he would be happy to meet with anyone that has questions. Mr. Knowles thought there was a storage facilities close by, and that another one is not needed. A man (did not identify himself) hoped the entire City is not paved. He hoped this would be put further south in another area of the City. Kathy Munson stated they do net object to Edison using their land as a nursery because it is quiet and green. She stated some of the residents would be happy to meet with Edison to come to some sort of agreement as to what can go in there. Maria Solarano stated she does have children and felt if this will bring vandalism she is concerned for them. She stated she is willing to help bring in a park or a place for children to play in this area. She did not want this development to go in there. She felt it would hurt their home values. There being no further input, the public hearing closed. Councilmember Gutierrez stated after hearing this and reading the reports he feels that people are entitled to their own self-determination and that we should not be changing things that affect their property. He stated he does not like the storage facility at the 210 Freeway and Haven. He felt we need open space and felt enough is enough. He stated he does not like commercial development above Base Line. He felt we do need dog parks and other kinds of parks. He felt people were more important than a business deal. He stated he would not want to live next to a storage facility. Councilmember Michael asked why the Planning Commission approved this and what was the thought process. Brad Bullet, City Planner stated in the old Victoria Plan, storage facilities were planned to be built around these homes. He stated as land became so valuable they were planned outside of the Victoria area. He stated the homes today do not allow for RV parking and these facilities would help to accommodate that. He stated they have no information that these types of facilities do not make good neighbors. He stated these have been very successful. He stated the support for this goes back to the approval of the Victoria Plan. Councilmember Williams felt the whole corridor should be looked at instead of doing it a little piece here and there. S.he felt there might be a better use for this property and felt this should be put off for tonight. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated the MOU that is before the Council tonight, does include all Edison corridors. He stated the Council can take a step back and dialogue on all the Edison corridors. He stated if the City Council does not approve this amendment, the CUP for the mini-storage goes away because it is conditioned that this amendment go forward. Councilmember Williams stated she is concerned that Edison wilt continue putting more of these in. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated if the City Council is concerned they can say "no to more" and only approve the one storage facility. He stated they can prevent more from being approved. MOTION: Moved by Alexander suggested this be continued for one month and for the residents to meet with Planning staff to get all of their questions answered. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he wouldn't object to having a joint meeting with the Planning Commission to discuss the whole corridor. Mayor Alexander stated he didn't think we should have a joint meeting every time an issue comes up. City Council Minutes July 20, 2005 Page 10 Councilmember Michael felt possibly Edison could meet with staff and come up with another location before the City Council discusses this again in a month. He felt there were other opportunities 1o be looked at. Seconded by Michael to continue the item to the August 17th meeting. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. Mayor Alexander asked a lady from the audience to come forward so she would not have to wait until the end of the meeting in order to address the City council. Elena Bentea from Romania talked about the flooding going on in Romania. She had pictures for the City Council to see and stated she wanted 1o help Romania. She asked if the City Council knows of someone that can also help them. She stated people can call 484-0333 and talk to Elena, and she can provide the form which will also give the tax id number for tax deduction purposes. A recess was taken at 9:55 p.m.. The meeting was called back to order at 10:06 p.m. with all Councilmembers present. H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS H1. CONSIDERATION OF TWO JOINT COMMUNITY FACILITIES AGREEMENTS (JCFA) WITH THI ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT (CO 05-074, AND CO 05-075). Request from the Etiwanda School District that the City of Rancho Cucamonga enter into two separate Joint Community Facilities Agreements with the Etiwanda School District and the owners of certain property located within the City pertaining to the financing of public facilities, including facilities to be owned by the City, through the Pinehurst Public Facilities Community Facilities District No. 1 proposed to be formed by the Etiwanda School District. Jack stated it is requested this be removed from the agenda, and that it will be returned at a later date since it is not ready at this time. H2. REPORT ON STATUS OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL COORDINATION Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, introduced the item. He stated timing of signals is not the answer to good flowing traffic. He stated the state is not interested in working with a City to time signals. He stated it is also hard to time the signals at freeways because of coordinating things with Caltrans. A staff report and power point were presenied by Jim Harris, Associate Planner, which is on file in the City Clerk's office. Councilmember Gutierrez asked how we justify so many signals at full build out. Jim Harris, Associate Planner, stated there are rules or guidelines to be followed as to if a signal is needed. He stated there is a traffic study done with each new development. Councilmember Gutierrez asked various questions about ways to synchronize the signals in the City and felt it could possibly be done according to the time of day. He hoped any public that sees a signal that is not functioning properly would call the City. City Council Minutes July 20, 2005 Page 11 Jim Harris, Associate Planner, stated the public could call him at City Hall at extension 4052 if they need to talk to him about any signal related problems. [[ I. COUNCIL BUSINESS I1. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENT,C; (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Councilmember.) Councilmember Gutierrez had no comments. Councilmember Spagnolo commented on the drownings that had recently taken place and commented on the programs in the community to educate people. He stated this is the silent killer of kids and that it is very important for people to think about this. He stated the Water Watcher Program is very good and people can call the Fire Department about this. Councilmember Michael stated he appreciated all the efforts of the Police Department and Deputy Hill for the bicycle rodeo. He mentioned the" ' ,, topping off ceremony at the Cultural Center last Friday and what a great facility it will be. He stated residents, businesses, etc. can donate to help pay for this. He commended Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director, for the great event. Councilmember Williams talked about the event at TAMCO which was called Project Isaiah. She stated this involves guns that are melted down into steel and are now off the street. She stated staff did a great job with the topping off party at the Cultural Center. She commented on the Harry Potter book release and the activities that took place at the library. 12. CONSIDERATION OF CITY COUNCIL COMMUNITY SERVICES SUBCOMMITTEE':; RECOMMENDATION REGARDING APPOINTMENTS TO THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION BQARt] OF DIRECTORS Councilmember Williams stated there was a City Council Subcommittee Meeting that she attended with Councilmember Spagnolo on July 11th. MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Michael to reappoint Tony Mize, Chuck Buquet and Harvey Cohen, and not reappoint Mike Arreguin at his request due to time constraints with his business. Councilmember Michael asked about the process to fill Mike Arreguin's position. Kevin stated the Board is approved to have 30 members, and they will be doing another recruitment process in the near future. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. City Council Minutes July 20, 2005 Page 12 MOTION: Moved by Michael, seconded by Alexander to adjourn to closed session. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 10:44 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: * August 3, 2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMQNGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Reflu ar Meetin¢l A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, August 3, 2005, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor William J. Alexander called the meeting to order at 7:23 p.m. Present were Councilmembers: Sam Spagnolo, Diane Williams and Mayor William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Director; Flavio Nunez, RDA Analyst; Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director; Manuel Pilonieta, Information Systems Manager; Lorraine Phony, Information Systems Analyst; Mike Toy, Information 'Systems Specialist; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Karen McGuire-Emery, Senior Park Planner; Maria Perez, Associate Engineer; Brad Buller, City Planner; Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director; Dave Moore, Recreation Superintendent; Francie Palmer, Marketing Manager; Deborah Clark, Library Director; Captain Pete Ortiz, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; Kimbedy Thomas, Management Analyst III; Fabian Villenas, Management Analyst II; Kathy Scott, Deputy City Clerk; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. Absent were Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez and L. Dennis Michael [[ B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS I No announcements~presentat ons were made. Ir c. PUBLIC COMMLTNICATIONS I Cl. John Lyons, Etiwanda area, talked about a trip that St. Peter/St. Paul and Sacred Hearth Churches will be taking to Germany in honor of World Youth Day, which they will be leaving in the next week. He mentioned an article in the newspaper about the Colonies project. He wanted the Colonies people to remember this is a flood control area where they are talking about building. He hoped the County would not give them the land. He felt the land should be left alone as open space so water can percolate there because it is used by other communities as well as Rancho Cucamonga. He felt Upland was in danger of flooding. He hoped the County would not make a property swap in this location. He felt Jeff Burum should be made aware this is in a flood control area.. C2. Melanie Ingrain asked if everyone has been following the Colonies Project. She talked about the lawsuit regarding this project. She felt the City should hold fast to open space and not do what Upland has done. She commented the cost of the property was a mere $16,000,000 that the Colonies project is built on and did not think the County owed them a dime. She told about the importance of open space. She continued to talk about information that she had previously distributed to the City Council. City Council Minutes August 3, 2005 Page 2 C3. Bill McCliman stated he received a call yesterday from a senior citizen who was having problems at their senior complex with a neighbor and stated the people are not getting any help from their landlord. He provided the City Clerk with the location of this facility and asked if the City can help. He stated now is the time to sign up for ACE Softball. He stated he agreed with the Governor that there should be 4-man crews on the fire engines. He stated the Fire Chief recently presented the strategic plan at a public meeting. He did not agree with the information that was presented by Mr. Lacy. He asked again for the Council to help the senior he was previously talking about. C4. Paul Chabot wanted to praise the Police Department. He stated they have been fantastic. He also commented on the graffiti program. He talked about the Inland Empire Drug Free Coalition that he was a part of. He felt San Bernardino County is lacking help to fight drugs. He stated this is a federal program. He stated they are trying to bring a grant to the San Bernardino County to start an Inland Empire Drug Free Coalition. He stated this grant would come from the federal government. He hoped this would serve as a role model for the entire country. O. CONSENT CALENDAR Jack Lam, City Manager, stated item D14 has a slight title change with a corrected memo in front of the City Council, which is on file in the City Clerk's office. DI. Approval of Minutes: June 8, 2005 (Special Meeting) July 6, 2005 July 18, 2005 (Special Meeting) July 6, 2005 (special meeting) D2. Approval of Warrants, Register 7/13/05 through 7/26/05 and Payroll ending 7/26/05, for the total amount of $4,767,369.88. D3. Approval of a contract extension with Coastal Building Services (CO 00-102) for a maximum of six months, not to exceed $175,321, which includes $20,000 for anticipated extra work related to construction, to be funded from 1001312-5304 ($173,503) and 1700201-5304 ($1,818). D4. Approval of a piggyback contract for the purchase of one new, dedicated CNG (Compressed Natural Gas) Street Sweeper from Kelly Equipment of Rancho Cucamonga, California, in the amount of $228,083.05, to be funded from Acct. 1188313-5603 (Integrated Waste Management) as approved in the FY 05/06 budget. D5. Approval to renew a Professional Services Agreement in an annual amount not to exceed $80,000 for the period of July 1, 2005 through June 30, 2006, to Huls Environmental, LLC, with an option to renew for additional one year periods, upon review and confirmation of pricing and mutual consent, to a total of three years, to be funded from 118-3135300. D6. Approval of vendor selection and award a contract to IBM for the purchase of an IBM Production Series Server for the Integrated Financial Accounting System (IFIS) application, and appropriate funds in the amount not to exceed $65,000.00 from Acct. 1714001-5605. D7. Approval to accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $998,694.00 to the apparent Iow bidder, Laird Construction Co., Inc. (CO 05-074), for the Base Bid of their proposal, and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $99,869.40 for the FY 2005/06 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation - Overlay of Various Streets, to be funded from CDBG funds, Acct. No. 1204-314-5650/1527204-0 and Measure "1" funds, Acct. No. 1176-303- 5650/1022176-0 and appropriate an additional amount of $410,000.00 to Acct. No. 1176-303- 5650/1022176-0 from Measure "1" fund balance. City Council Minutes August 3, 2005 Page 3 D8. Approval to accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $445,545.00 to the lowest responsible bidder, Laird Construction Co., Inc. (CO 05-075), and authorized the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $44,554.50 for the Grove Avenue Street Improvements from 8th Street to Arrow Route, to be funded from SB 325 funds, Acct. No. 1180- 303-5650/1472180-0, TEA-21 funds, Acct. No. 1208-303-5650/1472208-0, and Measure "l" funds, Acct. No. 1176-303-5650/1472176-0, and appropriate $490,099.50 (Contract award of $445,545.00 plus 10% contingency in the amount of $44,554.50) to Acct. No. 1180-303-5650/1472180-0 ($105,118.86) from SB 325 fund balance, Acct. No. 1208-303-5650/1472208-0 ($314,000.00) from TEA-21 fund balance, and Acct. No. 1176-303-5650/1472176-0 ($84,000.00) from Measure "1" fund balance. D9. Approval and authorization of a sole source Professional Services Agreement between All City Management Services (CO 05-076) and the City of Rancho Cucamonga to provide school crossing guard services. D10. Approval of the Cooperative Agreement between the City of Up/and and the City of Rancho Cucamonga (CO 05-077) for Street Improvements on Grove Avenue located within the City of Upland, and authorize the Mayor to sign the agreement and City Clerk to attest thereto. D11. Approval to enter into an agreement with the San Bernardino County Flood Control District (CO 05- 078) to lease property at 12158 Base Line Road to facilitate the operation of the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Hazardous Waste Program. D12. Approval of a Professional Services Agreement with SB&O, /nc. (CO 05-079), in the amount of $65,000, and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $6,500 to provide Fiscal Year 2005/2006 Topographical Design Survey services for proposed capital improvement projects at various locations within the City, to be funded from various individual project accounts as approved in the FY 2005/2006 budget, and appropriate $10,000 to Acct. No. 1110-303-5650/1533176-0 (Cucamonga Creek Bike Trail) from Beautification fund balance. D13. Approve a contract extension with WSA Security,/nc. (CO 01-060) to June 30, 2006, to be funded from Acct. Nos. 1001312-5304 ($120,000), 1133303-5304 ($120,000), 1700201-5304 ($70,380), and 1290606-5300 ($22,000) to cover monthly service and extra work for Fiscal Year 05-06. D14. Approval to accept the Victoria Arbors Park Improvement Project from Standard Pacific/Victoria Arbors, LLC, as complete, authorize the filing of a Notice of Completion, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept the Maintenance Bond, and record the Grant Deed for the property. CORRECTED. RESOLUTION NO. 05-233 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR VICTORIA ARBORS PARK AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D15. Approval to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond No. PRF8699474 in the amount of $285,166.00 for the Carnelian Street Storm Drain and Street Rehabilitation Improvements from Vivero Street to 19th Street, Contract No. 03-058. Motion: Moved by Williams, seconded by Spagnolo to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports contained within the Consent Calendar as corrected. Motion carried unanimously 3-0-2 (Gutierrez and Michael absent). ~l E. CONSENT ORDINANCES I No items submitted. City Council Minutes August3,2005 Page 4 F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS No items submitted. II ~. PUBLIC HEARINGS No items submitted. [I H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS I H1. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE 2005/2010 MEASURE 'T' FIVE-YEAR CAPITAl IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AND TWENTY-YEAR TRANSPORTATION PLAN BEGINNING IN FISCAl YEAR 2005/06, AS REQUIRED FOR MEASURE "1" FUNDS Jack Lam, City Manager, stated this item would be brought back at the next meeting since two Councilmembers are absent. RESOLUTION NO. 05-234 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE 2005/2010 MEASURE 'T' FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AND TVVENTY- YEAR TRANSPORTATION PLAN BEGINNING IN FISCAL YEAR 2004/05 FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF MEASURE 'T' FUNDS H2. STATUS ON VICTORIAARBORS PARK (Oral) A staff report and power point presentation were given by Karen McGuire Emery, Senior Park Planner, which is on file in the City Clerk's office. ACTION: Report received and flied. H3. CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE AND RESOLUTIONS REPEALING COUNCIL ACTIONS IN REFERENCE TO THE ETIWANDA CREEK PROJECT IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE SUPERIOR COURT JUDGMENT, CASE NO. RVC 081807 A staff report was presented by James Markman, City Attorney, who stated there were four lawsuits that were prosecuted in relation to a series of annexations, the Etiwanda Creek Project being one of them. He stated this was a project of the City that did not have a development attached to it. He stated the annexation as well as the zoning were attacked. He stated three of the four items of litigation were settled. He stated as part of that settlement, it was agreed the annexation would stand, but the zoning actions repealed and addressed later when there is a development proposed. He stated we are required by the judgment to repeal those zoning actions. He stated before the Council is Resolution 05-235 and Ordinance No. 747 for approval. City Council Minutes August 3, 2005 Page 5 Mayor Alexander opened the item for public input. There being no response, public comments were closed. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 747. RESOLUTION NO. 05-235 A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING ITS RESOLUTIONS NOS. 04-211 AND 04-212 ORDINANCE NO. 747 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING ITS ORDINANCE NO. 728 MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Spagnolo to approve Resolution No. 05-235 and waive full reading and set second reading of Ordinance No. 747 for the August 17, 2005 meeting. Motion carried unanimously 3-0-2 (Gutierrez and Michael absent). II I. COUNCIL BUSINESS I I1. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Councilmember.) Councilmember Williams stated National Night out was last night, She stated she recently attended the Mayor and Councilmembers Conference and that people were talking about our new shopping center, She stated people in Sacramento are talking about the State taking away the rights of land development from the cities. She stated the League is working hard to stop this. She stated they are threatening to take away water for new developments. She stated people should get involved so the State knows we want local control. Councilmember Spagnolo stated he and the Mayor, along with Councilmembers Gutierrez and Williams participated in National Night Out with the Police Chief, and added what a great event it was. He stated today is his 42nd anniversary and wanted to wish his wife a happy anniversary, Mayor Alexander wished Councilmember Spagnolo a happy anniversary. He stated Pauline Dean passed away today and talked about what she contributed to the senior community. He stated he would like to adjourn in her memory and stated she was a wonderful lady, 12. LEGISLATIVE UPDATE Councilmember Williams stated the house transportation bill was approved which would bring $4,000,0000 to Rancho Cucamonga for the 115 Freeway. She stated this was assisted by Congressman Dreier. She also stated the Vehicle License Fee (VLF) money is going to be returned to the City a year early. 13. DISCUSSION OF TOWN HALL MEETING FOR PUBLIC SAFETY Councilmember Spagnolo stated he would like to continue this to the next meeting so all Councilmembers could be present for the discussion on this item. ACTION: Item to come back on the August 17, 2005 agenda. City Council Minutes August 3, 2005 Page 6 Mayor Alexander adjourned the meeting in the memory of Pauline Dean. The meeting adjourned at 8:00 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: * CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 7/27/2005 through 8/9/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP- 00225740 7/27/2005 ABC LOCKSMITHS 978.27 AP - 00225741 7/27/2005 ACTION AWARDS INC. 984.96 AP - 00225742 7/27/2005 AMERICAN LIFEGUARD PRODUCTS 625.65 AP - 00225742 7/27/2005 AMERICAN LIFEGUARD PRODUCTS 1,398.06 AP - 00225743 7/27/2005 AMERICAN ROTARY BROOM CO. INC. 153.27 AP - 00225744 7/27/2005 ANDRADE, LAINI 28.75 AP - 00225746 7/27/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 470.58 AP - 00225746 7/27/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 172.07 AP - 00225747 7/27/2005 BASAT, SHAPIRO-BEN 4,021.60 AP - 00225747 7/27/2005 BASAT, SHAPIRO-BEN 9,142.40 AP - 00225747 7/27/2005 BASAT, SHAPIRO-BEN -914.24 AP - 00225747 7/27/2005 BASAT, SHAPIRO-BEN 402.16 AP - 00225749 7/27/2005 BERGELECTRIC CORPORATION 15,244.26 AP - 00225749 7/27/2005 BERGELECTRIC CORPORATION 29,798.25 AP - 00225749 7/27/2005 BERGELECTRIC CORPORATION -1,524.43 AP - 00225749 7/27/2005 BERGELECTRIC CORPORATION -693.85 AP - 00225749 7/27/2005 BERGELECTRIC CORPORATION 97,895.66 AP - 00225749 7/27/2005 BERGELECTRIC CORPORATION -709.25 AP - 00225749 7/27/2005 BERGELECTRIC CORPORATION -9,789.57 AP - 00225749 7/27/2005 BERGELECTRIC CORPORATION -4,239.71 AP - 00225749 7/27/2005 BERGELECTRIC CORPORATION 3,289.10 AP - 00225749 7/27/2005 BERGELECTRIC CORPORATION 42,397.10 AP - 00225749 7/27/2005 BERGELECTRIC CORPORATION -7,121.51 AP - 00225749 7/27/2005 BERGELECTRIC CORPORATION 778.00 AP - 00225750 7/27/2005 BEST BEST AND KRIEGER 7,053.76 AP - 00225754 7/27/2005 CALIFORNIA PARK & RECREATION SOCIETY 110.00 AP - 00225755 7/27/2005 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 490.01 AP - 00225756 7/27/2005 CHAMPION AWARDS AND SPECIALIES 80.81 AP - 00225757 7/27/2005 CHICKS SPORTING GOODS INC 1,134.60 AP - 00225758 7/27/2005 CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. 211.04 AP - 00225759 7/27/2005 CLEAR CHANNEL BROADCASTING INC. 300.00 AP - 00225760 7/27/2005 COLEMAN, REBECCA 35.44 AP - 00225763 7/27/2005 CREATIVE MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS 2,125.00 AP - 00225764 7/27/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 495.91 AP - 00225764 7/27/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 18,323.59 AP - 00225765 7/27/2005 CYBERCOM RESOURCES INC 525.00 AP - 00225765 7/27/2005 CYBERCOM RESOURCES INC 700.00 AP - 00225765 7/27/2005 CYBERCOM RESOURCES INC 3,325.00 AP - 00225765 7/27/2005 CYBERCOM RESOURCES INC 525.00 AP - 00225766 7/27/2005 DOMINGUEZ, ROBERTO A 1,766.50 AP - 00225767 7/27/2005 DYNASTY SCREEN PRINTING 465.26 AP - 00225768 7/27/2005 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS 979.70 AP 00225769 7/27/2005 ENVIROKLEEN 38.13 AP 00225770 7/27/2005 ESGIL CORPORATION 39,444.32 AP 00225770 7/27/2005 ESGIL CORPORATION 24,962.42 AP 00225771 7/27/2005 EXCEL CABINETS INC 88.45 AP 00225772 7/27/2005 FASTENAL COMPANY 37.12 AP 00225772 7/27/2005 FASTENAL COMPANY 28.98 AP - 00225772 7/27/2005 FASTENAL COMPANY 241.74 AP - 00225773 7/27/2005 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 720.00 AP- 00225773 7/27/2005 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 627.00 AP - 00225773 7/27/2005 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 741.00 AP- 00225773 7/27/2005 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 780.00 AP - 00225773 7/27/2005 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 411.94 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 1 Current Date: 08/10/200 Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: ,~ 08:54:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 7/27/2005 through 8/9/2005 Check No: Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00225773 7/27/2005 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 390.00 AP - 00225773 7/27/2005 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 978.00 AP- 00225773 7/27/2005 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 969.00 AP - 00225773 7/27/2005 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 720.00 AP - 00225773 7/27/2005 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 720.00 AP - 00225774 7/27/2005 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 243.50 AP- 00225774 7/27/2005 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 154.58 AP - 00225775 7/27/2005 G M BUSINESS INTERIORS 4,800.00 AP - 00225777 7/27/2005 GARNEY, CATHLEEN 53.86 AP- 00225778 7/27/2005 GEIGERBROTHERS WEST 172.16 AP - 00225779 7/27/2005 GLOBAL PRESENTER 31,063.73 AP - 00225780 7/27/2005 GRAINGER 193.37 AP - 00225780 7/27/2005 GRAINGER 51.29 AP - 00225781 7/27/2005 GREEN BAY PACKAGING INC. 466.26 AP- 00225782 7/27/2005 H.L. HOMES CORP 4,265.51 AP - 00225784 7/27/2005 HUANG, PRUDENCE 525.00 AP - 00225786 7/27/2005 INLAND EMPIRE TOURS AND TRANSPORTATI£ 768.00 AP - 00225789 7/27/2005 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 478.80 AP - 00225789 7/27/2005 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 114.60 AP - 00225789 7/27/2005 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 114.60 AP - 00225789 7/27/2005 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 114.60 AP - 00225790 7/27/2005 INSIGHT DIRECT 377.13 AP - 00225791 7/27/2005 JONES, BOB 2,560.00 AP - 00225793 7/27/2005 KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 481.96 AP - 00225794 7/27/2005 LARSON, KELLEY 93.18 AP - 00225795 7/27/2005 MARK CHRIS INC 341.17 AP - 00225796 7/27/2005 MASTER BUILDING SPECIALTIES 525.00 AP - 00225797 7/27/2005 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 1,253.47 AP - 00225800 7/27/2005 NESTOR TRAFFIC SYSTEMS 16,920.00 AP - 00225801 7/27/2005 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFG 236.79 AP - 00225802 7/27/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 15.47 AP 00225802 7/27/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 59.24 AP 00225803 7/27/2005 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 72.14 AP 00225803 7/27/2005 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 16.14 AP 00225803 7/27/2005 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 177.92 AP 00225803 7/27/2005 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 20.56 AP 00225803 7/27/2005 ORCHARD SUPPLY HAKDWARE 221.04 AP 00225803 7/27/2005 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 18.06 AP - 00225803 7/27/2005 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 12.90 AP - 00225803 7/27/2005 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 558.18 AP q 00225803 7/27/2005 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 235.82 AP - 00225803 7/27/2005 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 325.84 AP - 00225803 7/27/2005 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 26.92 AP - 00225803 7/27/2005 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 78.88 AP - 00225803 7/27/2005 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 190.12 AP - 00225803 7/27/2005 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 50.46 AP - 00225803 7/27/2005 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 222.72 AP - 00225803 7/27/2005 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 132.47 AP - 00225804 7/27/2005 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 4.51 AP - 00225805 7/27/2005 OWEN ELECTRIC 16.55 AP - 00225807 7/27/2005 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 15,947.59 AP - 00225808 7/27/2005 POUK AND STEINLE 1NC. 110,706.30 AP - 00225809 7/27/2005 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION INC 78.64 AP- 00225810 7/27/2005 PRIZIO CONSTRUCTION INC 211,532.66 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 2 Current Date: 08/10/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:54:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 7/27/2005 through 8/9/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00225810 7/27/2005 PRIZIOCONSTRUCTIONINC -21,153.27 AP 00225810 7/27/2005 PRIZIO CONSTRUCTION INC 8,463.31 AP 00225810 7/27/2005 PRIZIO CONSTRUCTION [NC -846.32 AP 00225810 7/27/2005 PRIZIO CONSTRUCTION [NC 12,405.35 AP 00225810 7/27/2005 PRIZIO CONSTRUCTION [NC -1,240.54 AP 00225810 7/27/2005 PRIZIO CONSTRUCTIONINC 15,705.86 AP 00225810 7/27/2005 PRIZIO CONSTRUCTION INC -1,570.59 AP 00225811 7/27/2005 REPUBLIC ELECTRIC 7,989.77 AP 00225812 7/27/2005 SANBERNARDINOCTYSHERIFFSDEPT 366,356.79 AP 00225813 7/27/2005 SMITH, DAVID 2,971.56 AP- 00225814 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19,429.89 AP - 00225814 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14,992.80 AP- 00225814 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12,120.96 AP - 00225814 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 39.20 AP - 00225814 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 31.87 AP - 00225814 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 35.60 AP 00225814 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 6,576.16 AP 00225814 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 44.17 AP 00225814 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.08 AP 00225814 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 532.05 AP 00225814 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,453.03 AP 00225814 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 6,032.56 AP 00225814 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 34,629.12 AP 00225814 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 181.47 AP 00225814 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 44.24 AP 00225814 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,727.75 AP 00225814 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2~868.67 AP - 00225814 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 4,212.90 AP - 00225815 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 559.06 AP - 00225816 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14,855.93 AP - 00225816 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 27.55 AP - 00225817 7/27/2005 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 67.30 AP- 00225817 7/27/2005 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 105.01 AP- 00225817 7/27/2005 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 128.25 AP - 00225817 7/27/2005 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 116.75 AP - 00225817 7/27/2005 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 141.95 AP - 00225819 7/27/2005 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 74.79 AP - 00225819 7/27/2005 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 59.79 AP - 00225819 7/27/2005 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 116.37 AP - 00225820 7/27/2005 W AND W STEEL COMPANY 162,750.14 AP - 00225820 7/27/2005 W AND'W STEEL COMPANY 66,564.81 AP - 00225820 7/27/2005 W AND W STEEL COMPANY 41,256.00 AP - 00225820 7/27/2005 W AND W STEEL COMPANY -4,125.60 AP - 00225820 7/27/2005 W AND W STEEL COMPANY -16,275.01 AP - 00225820 7/27/2005 W AND W STEEL COMPANY -6,656.48 AP- 00225821 7/27/2005 WILLDANASSOCIATES 12,750.00 AP- 00225821 7/27/2005 WILLDAN ASSOCIATES 51,235.00 AP- 00225823 7/27/2005 ABLAC 273.17 AP - 00225824 7/27/2005 ACTION AWARDS INC. 631.80 AP - 00225826 7/27/2005 AEG ARTS & EXHIBITIONS 1,350.00 AP- 00225828 7/27/2005 AGUILERA, CONCETTA 80.00 AP - 00225829 7/27/2005 AKPANUDOSEN, ANIEMA 250.00 AP - 00225830 7/27/2005 ALTAMIRANO, MARTHA 80.00 AP - 00225831 7/27/2005 ANDRONICOS, JOANN 42.00 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 3 Current Date: 08/10/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portxait Layout Time:-'/ 08:54:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 7/27/2005 through 8/9/2005 Check No. Check Date. Vendor Name Amount AP- 00225832 7/27/2005 ANUMBA, ETHEL 80.00 AP - 00225835 7/27/2005 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 205.00 AP - 00225835 7/27/2005 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 105.29 AP - 00225835 7/27/2005 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 45.85 AP - 00225835 7/27/2005 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 70.36 AP - 00225835 7/27/2005 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 1,190.00 AP - 00225835 7/27/2005 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 28.09 AP - 00225835 7/27/2005 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 188.07 AP - 00225835 7/27/2005 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 796.36 AP - 00225835 7/27/2005 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 30.08 AP - 00225835 7/27/2005 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 140.20 AP - 00225835 7/27/2005 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 249.00 AP - 00225835 7/27/2005 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 127.14 AP - 00225835 7/27/2005 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 757.97 AP - 00225835 7/27/2005 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 140.00 AP - 00225835 7/27/2005 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 43.97 AP - 00225835 7/27/2005 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 132.19 AP - 00225835 7/27/2005 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 167.30 AP - 00225835 7/27/2005 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 126.95 AP - 00225835 7/27/2005 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 23.90 AP - 00225835 7/27/2005 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 704.74 AP - 00225835 7/27/2005 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 144.41 AP - 00225835 7/27/2005 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 118.61 AP - 00225835 7/27/2005 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 308.22 AP 00225835 7/27/2005 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 97.75 AP 00225835 7/27/2005 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 593.21 AP 00225835 7/27/2005 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 66.40 AP 00225835 7/27/2005 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 75.00 AP 00225835 7/27/2005 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 16.16 AP 00225835 7/27/2005 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 163.92 AP 00225835 7/27/2005 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 80.00 AP 00225836 7/27/2005 AYON, OLIVIA 40.00 AP 00225837 7/27/2005 BALDEON, CARLOS 82.50 AP 00225838 7/27/2005 BASSLER, DYAN 66.00 AP 00225839 7/27/2005 BEIERLE, MARY 370.75 AP 00225840 7/27/2005 BERNARD, JEREMY 522.50 AP - 00225841 7/27/2005 BHIBEKSHAN, SAROJ 105.00 AP - 00225842 7/27/2005 BILL BLANCHARDS LITTLE BIG BAND 550.00 AP - 00225843 7/27/2005 BISHOP, JENNIFER 40.00 AP - 00225844 7/27/2005 BLAKE, PATRICK 2,000.00 AP- 00225844 7/27/2005 BLAKE, PATRICK 170.00 AP - 00225845 7/27/2005 BOCTOR, ALFRED 70.00 AP - 00225846 7/27/2005 BROCK, TIM 4.00 AP- 00225847 7/27/2005 CALBO 215.00 AP - 00225848 7/27/2005 CALIFORNIA CONTRACT CITIES ASSOCIATION 560.00 AP - 00225851 7/27/2005 CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES 72,823.08 AP- 00225852 7/27/2005 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 22.50 AP- 00225854 7/27/2005 CARTER, DEBBIE 88.00 AP - 00225855 7/27/2005 CATALINA PASSENGER SERVICE INC. 2,120.00 AP - 00225856 7/27/2005 CIFUENTES, HAROLD 36.00 AP- 00225857 7/27/2005 CMTA 25.00 AP- 00225858 7/27/2005 COLGROVE, ADAM 72.00 AP - 00225859 7/27/2005 CONTRERAS, MARTHA 40.00 AP - 00225860 7/27/2005 CONVENTO, NANCY 40.00 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 4 Current Date: 08/10/200 Report:CK_AGENDA KEG_PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:t] 08:54:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 7/27/2005 through 8/9/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP-00225861 7/27/2005 COURT TRUSTEE 200.00 AP - 00225862 7/27/2005 COURT TRUSTEE 118.50 AP ~ 00225863 7/27/2005 DAWSON, WILLIAM D. 1,000.00 AP - 00225864 7/27/2005 DAY TIMERS INC 48.48 AP 00225865 7/27/2005 DE SILVA, ALLAN 30.75 AP 00225866 7/27/2005 DEL CASTILLO, JOSHELLE 50.00 AP 00225867 7/27/2005 DEMPSTER, KERI 216.00 AP 00225868 7/27/2005 DENTAL HEALTH SERVICES 124.20 AP 00225869 7/27/2005 DIEVENDORF, CHRISTOPHER 249.37 AP 00225870 7/27/2005 DOUBLET-DELION, PATRICIA 483.00 AP 00225871 7/27/2005 DREDD, JOHNNY 250.00 AP 00225872 7/27/2005 DUBOIS, JILL 40.00 AP 00225873 7/27/2005 EGGERS, ROBERT A. 632.00 AP 00225874 7/27/2005 ELLIS, MICHELLE 56.00 AP 00225876 7/27/2005 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 14.29 AP 00225877 7/27/2005 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 141.50 AP 00225877 7/27/2005 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 257.00 AP 00225877 7/27/2005 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 390.00 AP 00225877 7/27/2005 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 360.00 AP 00225877 7/27/2005 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 459.00 AP 00225877 7/27/2005 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 756.00 AP 00225877 7/27/2005 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 195.00 AP 00225877 7/27/2005 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 141.50 AP - 00225878 7/27/2005 FOOTHILL CHAPTER OF ICC 50.00 AP - 00225879 7/27/2005 GADABOUT TOI~JRS INC 1,227.20 AP - 00225880 7/27/2005 GADIS, L1NDA 200.00 AP - 00225881 7/27/2005 GALVIN, CHRISTINA 60.00 AP - 00225882 7/27/2005 GARCIA, KAREN 50.00 AP - 00225883 7/27/2005 GILBERT, DR. DAVID 200.00 AP - 00225884 7/27/2005 GILLAND, MICHAEL 72.00 AP - 00225885 7/27/2005 GIUDICE, JENNIFER 456.00 AP - 00225886 7/27/2005 GONZALES, MICHELLE 36.00 AP - 00225887 7/27/2005 GREEN, CAROL 40.00 AP - 00225887 7/27/2005 GREEN, CAROL 4.00 AP - 00225888 7/27/2005 HAKIMI, SUSAN 494.59 AP - 00225889 7/27/2005 HAO, DANNY 20.00 AP - 00225890 7/27/2005 HARALAMBOS BEVERAGE COMPANY 676.14 AP - 00225891 7/27/2005 HERNANDEZ, DIANA 40.00 AP - 00225892 7/27/2005 HOLLOWAY-FRIESEN, HOLLY 30.00 AP - 00225893 7/27/2005 HOT SHOTS ATHLETIC APPAREL INC 211.74 AP - 00225893 7/27/2005 HOT SHOTS ATHLETIC APPAREL INC 18.40 AP - 00225894 7/27/2005 HUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN BERNARDINO VALI 477.00 AP - 00225895 7/27/2005 HURST, CHERYL 288.50 AP- 00225896 7/27/2005 ICMA 1,116.00 AP - 00225897 7/27/2005 ILES, LETITE 78.00 AP - 00225898 7/27/2005 INLAND EMPIRE TOURS AND TRANSPORTATI£ 751.50 AP - 00225898 7/27/2005 INLAND EMPIRE TOURS AND TRANSPORTATI£ 2,539.00 AP - 00225899 7/27/2005 JACOBS, JANICE 45.50 AP - 00225900 7/27/2005 JONES, MAURICE 100.00 AP - 00225901 7/27/2005 JOZWlCK, RICK 900.00 AP - 00225902 7/27/2005 KAMAL, MOHAMMED 22.80 AP - 00225903 7/27/2005 KAPLAN, DENEAN 864.00 AP- 00225904 7/27/2005 KIBRITJIAN, TOROS 70.00 AP-00225905 7/27/2005 KIM, SOON 50.00 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 5 Current Date: 08/10/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:~'08:54:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 7/27/2005 through 8/9/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00225906 7/27/2005 KOTZIN AND ASSOCIATES, R 410.50 AP - 00225907 7/27/2005 LAGAL, MICHAEL 80.00 AP - 00225907 7/27/2005 LAGAL, MICHAEL 4.00 AP - 00225908 7/27/2005 LOCKETT, O'SHAWNA 500.00 AP - 00225910 7/27/2005 LOS ANGELES COCA COLA BTL CO 447.67 AP - 00225911 7/27/2005 MACIAS, VANESSA 40.00 AP - 00225912 7/27/2005 MADARANG, RUTH 77.00 AP - 00225913 7/27/2005 MAMARIL, ANN-MARIE 50.00 AP - 00225914 7/27/2005 MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE 45.00 AP - 00225915 7/27/2005 MARTINEZ, MELINDA 40.00 AP - 00225916 7/27/2005 MATAMOROS, LESLIE 337.50 AP - 00225917 7/27/2005 MCGEE, CATHERINE 40.00 AP - 00225918 7/27/2005 MCRAVEN, MICHAEL 36.00 AP - 00225919 7/27/2005 MIRZA, SHGUFTA 80.00 AP - 00225920 7/27/2005 MONTGOMERY, KATHY 56.50 AP - 00225920 7/27/2005 MONTGOMERY, KATHY 5.00 AP - 00225921 7/27/2005 MT BALDY STUDY CLUB 500.00 AP - 00225922 7/27/2005 MUNOZ, IRENE 250.00 AP - 00225923 7/27/2005 N M A DUES C/O DAVID MCDONALD 5.54 AP - 00225924 7/27/2005 NASH, JESSICA 592.50 AP 00225925 7/27/2005 NATIONAL DEFERRED 30,711.64 AP 00225926 7/27/2005 NGUYEN, I-IAI 135.28 AP 00225927 7/27/2005 NIKPOUR, MOHAMMED 35.00 AP 00225928 7/27/2005 ORNELAS, ESTHER 50.00 AP 00225929 7/27/2005 OUTBACK RANCHO CUCAMONGA LLC 77.00 AP 00225930 7/27/2005 PACIFICARE OF CALIFORNIA 68,693.61 AP 00225931 7/27/2005 PARAYNO, YVETTE 50.00 AP 00225932 7/27/2005 PARSAC 69,950.00 AP 00225933 7/27/2005 PC WORLD 19.97 AP - 00225934 7/27/2005 PEERBHOY, ZEHRA 40.00 AP - 00225935 7/27/2005 PERALES, LEON 59.00 AP - 00225936 7/27/2005 PERDUE AND ASSOCIATES, LEN 2,500.00 AP - 00225937 7/27/2005 PERERA, MICHELLE 96.91 AP- 00225938 7/27/2005 PEREZ, HECTOR 107.00 AP - 00225939 7/27/2005 PHILLIPS, HILDA 44.30 AP - 00225940 7/27/2005 POTTORFF, JAZMIN 20.00 AP - 00225941 7/27/2005 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 129.39 AP - 00225942 7/27/2005 PROMED SERVICES INC 7.00 AP - 00225943 7/27/2005 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 7.00 AP - 00225943 7/27/2005 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 7.00 AP - 00225944 7/27/2005 PUNSALAN, MARIAN 80.00 AP - 00225945 7/27/2005 QUALITY CURBS INC 246.50 AP - 00225946 7/27/2005 QUINTANA, ZITA 193.00 AP - 00225947 7/27/2005 RANCHO SCREEN PRINT AND EMBROIDERY 306.01 AP - 00225948 7/27/2005 RED WING SHOE STORE 135.77 AP - 00225949 7/27/2005 RE1NHARDTSEN, DEBRA 282.50 AP - 00225950 7/27/2005 RIVERSIDE CO DEPT CHILD SUPPORT 250.00 AP - 00225951 7/27/2005 RODRIGUEZ, PATRICIA 104.50 AP - 00225952 7/27/2005 SAN BERNARD/NO CTY CHILD SUPPORT PAYh4 213.50 AP - 00225953 7/27/2005 SAN BERNARDINO CTY CHILD SUPPORT PAYIX4 392.44 AP - 00225954 7/27/2005 SAN BERNARD/NO CTY CHILD SUPPORT PAY34 322.50 AP - 00225955 7/27/2005 . SCOTT, DIANA 250.00 AP- 00225956 7/27/2005 SHEPARD, BRENDA 500.00 AP - 00225957 7/27/2005 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 281.59 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 6 Current Date: 08/10/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:J 08:54:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 7/27/2005 through 8/9/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00225958 7/27/2005 SLJ PRO AUDIO SERVICES 330.00 AP 00225958 7/27/2005 SLJ PRO AUDIO SERVICES 70.00 AP 00225959 7/27/2005 SMART AND FINAL 55.41 AP 00225959 7/27/2005 SMART AND FINAL 55.65 AP 00225960 7/27/2005 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 33.86 AP 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 3,286.29 AP 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 28.12 AP 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.27 AP 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.10 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.10 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.10 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.10 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.76 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.10 AP 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 39.94 AP 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 27.08 AP 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.22 AP 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 83.45 AP 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.78 AP 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.39 AP 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 59.67 AP 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.63 AP 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 3,721.77 AP 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.10 AP 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 48.98 AP 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 97.22 AP 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALiFORNIA EDISON 15.11 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 27.95 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 69.78 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 75.00 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.58 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 104.51 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.87 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 56.78 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.61 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 30.07 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.10 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.27 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.10 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 38.59 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 30.64 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 29.28 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 32.78 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.04 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.76 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 77.87 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 75.81 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.04 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.01 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.27 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.74 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALiFORNIA EDISON 14.10 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.40 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 50.87 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 7 Current Date: 08/10/200 Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:,~ 08:54:2 ! CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 7/27/2005 through 8/9/2005 Cheek No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.59 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.10 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.57 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.93 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.10 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 69.60 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 79.88 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 66.90 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 76.48 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 98.31 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 80.09 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 106.03 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 87.46 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 69.60 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 78.30 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 145.91 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.05 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.10 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 124.52 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.58 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.10 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.10 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.04 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 96.07 AP 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.10 AP 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.04 AP 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 44.87 AP 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 62.88 AP 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 30.57 AP 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 29.73 AP 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 29.73 AP 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 29.91 AP 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 29.73 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.10 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.10 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.11 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.56 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.57 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.11 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.67 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 4,314.72 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 47.08 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.24 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.57 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.89 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 74.79 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 36.17 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.05 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.22 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.24 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 51.68 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 56.71 AP- 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.24 AP- 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.25 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 8 Current Date: 08/10/200 Repor t:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Porixait Layout Time:~ 08:54:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 7/27/2005 through 8/9/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.25 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.77 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 209.69 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ' 13.76 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.22 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.24 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 29.28 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.62 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.70 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.24 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.85 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.24 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 39.73 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.37 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.57 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 126.94 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.22 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.98 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.77 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.45 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.57 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 75.62 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.24 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 29.71 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.22 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.04 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 36.08 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.24 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 206.63 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.22 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.24 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 85.77 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 100.66 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 133.55 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.71 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.94 AP 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 72.18 AP 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 29.68 AP 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.23 AP 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 92.66 AP 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 80.28 AP 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 136.75 AP 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.43 AP 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.06 AP 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.53 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.59 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 69.53 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.69 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 27.85 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.89 AP- 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.83 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.70 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 303.64 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 9 Current Date: 08/10/200 Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portxait Layout Time'd~ 08:54:2 7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 7/27/2005 through 8/9/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 49.41 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.78 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.10 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.63 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.10 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 89.76 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.40 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.23 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.10 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.10 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.05 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.20 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 78.41 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.10 AP ~ 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.05 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.39 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.04 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.05 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.10 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.21 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.27 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.94 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 113.50 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 43.88 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 68.60 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 45.73 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.10 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 87.36 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.74 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.10 AP - 00225966 '7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 87.14 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.57 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.57 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 80.38 AP 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 51.78 AP 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.11 AP 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 73.96 AP 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.57 AP 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.77 AP 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.19 AP 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.57 AP 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.05 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.74 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.51 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.57 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.57 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.04 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.70 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 63.71 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.27 AP- 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.10 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.58 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.63 AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.10 User: VLOPEZ- Veronica Lopez Page: 10 Current Date: 08/10/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_R~EG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:~ 08:54:2 lO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 7/27/200~ through 8/9/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00225966 7/27/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 4,755.36 AP- 00225967 7/27/2005 STOFA, JOSEPH 15.00 AP - 00225969 7/27/2005 THEATRE OF THE PUPPETS 325.00 AP - 00225970 7/27/2005 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P, 1,379.30 AP- 00225971 7/27/2005 UNITED WAY 551.32 AP - 00225972 7/27/2005 US POSTMASTER 7,500.00 AP- 00225973 7/27/2005 VOLM, LIZA 112.50 AP - 00225974 7/27/2005 WARD, DESIREE 452.50 AP - 00225975 7/27/2005 WICKRAMANAYAKE, NANUJA 76.00 AP - 00225976 7/27/2005 FLORES, WILBERTO 40.00 AP - 00225976 7/27/2005 FLORES, WILBERTO 4.00 AP - 00225977 7/27/2005 YEE, LARRY 21.00 AP - 00225979 7/27/2005 UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION 2,461.00 AP - 00225980 8/2/2005 PADFIELD, NELLY 500.00 AP - 00225981 8/3/2005 A BETTER BILLIARDS 1,400.00 AP - 00225982 8/3/2005 AA EQUIPMENT 9,148.90 AP - 00225982 8/3/2005 AA EQUIPMENT 66.96 AP - 00225982 8/3/2005 AA EQUIPMENT 20,353.98 AP ~ 00225983 8/3/2005 ABC LOCKSMITHS 120.21 AP - 00225983 8/3/2005 ABC LOCKSMITHS 89.50 AP - 00225983 8/3/2005 ABC LOCKSMITHS 5,612.36 AP - 00225983 8/3/2005 ABC LOCKSMITHS 190.98 AP - 00225983 8/3/2005 ABC LOCKSMITHS 75.97 AP - 00225983 8/3/2005 ABC LOCKSMITHS 400.42 AP - 00225983 8/3/2005 ABC LOCKSMITHS 1,043.59 AP - 00225983 8/3/2005 ABC LOCKSMITHS 441.70 AP - 00225984 8/3/2005 ABLETRONICS -53.18 AP - 00225984 8/3/2005 ABLETRONICS 1,400.00 AP - 00225985 8/3/2005 ACEVEDO 250.00 AP - 00225986 8/3/2005 ACH MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS INC 26,871.00 AP - 00225986 8/3/2005 ACH MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS INC 6,257.70 AP - 00225986 8/3/2005 ACH MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS INC 4,134.00 AP 00225986 8/3/2005 ACH MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS 1NC -625.77 AP 00225986 8/3/2005 ACH MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS [NC 413.40 AP 00225986 8/3/2005 ACH MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS INC -2,687.10 AP 00225987 8/3/2005 ACTION SALES 2,249.82 AP 00225988 8/3/2005 ADVANCE UTILITY SYSTEMS 10,000.00 AP 00225989 8/3/2005 AEF SYSTEMS CONSULTING INC 437.50 AP 00225989 8/3/2005 AEF SYSTEMS CONSULTING [NC 87.50 AP 00225991 8/3/2005 ALL COLOR PAINT CORPORATION 194.92 AP 00225992 8/3/2005 ALL PRO ELECTRIC 42.63 AP 00225993 8/3/2005 ALTA LOMA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATES 3,667.00 AP - 00225994 8/3/2005 AMAZON.COM CREDIT 354.54 AP - 00225995 8/3/2005 AMERICAN ABRASIVE & TOOL [NC. 265.17 AP - 00225995 8/3/2005 AMERICAN ABRASIVE & TOOL INC. 29.74 AP - 00225995 8/3/2005 AMERICAN ABRASIVE & TOOL INC. 83.61 AP - 00225996 8/3/2005 AMERICAN CLASSIC SANITATION INC. 219.22 AP - 00225996 8/3/2005 AMERICAN CLASSIC SANITATION INC. 166.94 AP - 00225997 8/3/2005 AMERICAN LIFEGUARD PRODUCTS 47.41 AP - 00225998 8/3/2005 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 146.31 AP - 00225998 8/3/2005 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 146.31 AP - 00225998 8/3/2005 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 146.31 AP - 00225999 8/3/2005 APOLLO ELECTRIC CONTRACTORS 1,000.00 AP - 00226000 8/3/2005 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 52.34 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 11 Current Date: 08/10/200 Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:~j 08:54:2 l/ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 7/27/2005 through 8/9/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00226000 8/3/2005 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 384.80 AP - 00226000 8/3/2005 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 52.34 AP - 00226000 8/3/2005 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 810.00 AP - 00226000 8/3/2005 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 91.04 AP - 00226000 8/3/2005 ARCHITEKRA DESIGN GROUP 1,152.00 AP - 00226000 8/3/2005 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 792.00 AP - 00226000 8/3/2005 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 576.00 AP - 00226000 8/3/2005 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 300.00 AP - 00226001 8/3/2005 ARNOLD FIELDS PAINTING 1,200.00 AP - 00226001 8/3/2005 ARNOLD FIELDS PAINTING 1,200.00 AP - 00226001 8/3/2005 ARNOLD FIELDS PAINTING 475.00 AP - 00226001 8/3/2005 ARNOLD FIELDS PAINTING 1,500.00 AP - 00226002 8/3/2005 ASSI SECURITY 1,345.00 AP - 00226002 8/3/2005 ASSI SECURITY 135.00 AP - 00226002 8/3/2005 ASSI SECURITY 3,348.84 AP - 00226002 8/3/2005 ASSI SECURITY 71.50 AP - 00226003 8/3/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 704.31 AP - 00226003 8/3/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 2,157.16 AP 00226003 8/3/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 124.66 AP 00226003 8/3/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 273.24 AP 00226003 8/3/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 528.98 AP 00226003 8/3/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 281.11 AP 00226003 8/3/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 16.87 AP 00226003 8/3/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 215.23 AP 00226003 8/3/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 48.42 AP 00226003 8/3/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 272.18 AP - 00226003 8/3/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 277.38 AP - 00226003 8/3/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 17.89 AP - 00226003 8/3/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 23.96 AP - 00226003 8/3/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 110.87 AP - 00226004 8/3/2005 BARNES AND NOBLE 3,879.25 AP - 00226004 8/3/2005 BARNES AND NOBLE 2,556.64 AP - 00226004 8/3/2005 BARNES AND NOBLE 202.75 AP - 00226006 8/3/2005 BEST INTERIORS INC. 255.60 AP - 00226007 8/3/2005 BI-TECH SOFTWARE NATIONAL USERS GROUP 100.00 AP - 00226008 8/3/2005 BRESSMAN M.D.INC., PAUL 167.01 AP - 00226009 8/3/2005 BRODART BOOKS 4,130.91 AP - 00226009 8/3/2005 BRODART BOOKS 1,096.50 AP - 00226009 8/3/2005 BRODART BOOKS 771.34 AP - 00226009 8/3/2005 BRODART BOOKS 4,446.53 AP - 00226009 8/3/2005 BRODART BOOKS 1,110.83 AP - 00226010 8/3/2005 CAFORIO, GARY L 500.00 AP ~ 00226011 8/3/2005 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 2,931.17 AP - 00226012 8/3/2005 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 39.25 AP - 00226013 8/3/2005 CALSENSE 6,400.29 AP - 00226013 8/3/2005 CALSENSE 4,266.86 AP - 00226014 8/3/2005 CARDINAL INDUSTRIAL FINISHES 134.69 AP - 00226015 8/3/2005 CAUDLE, MICHAEL 200.00 AP - 00226016 8/3/2005 CENTRAL CITIES SIGNS INC 35.56 AP - 00226016 8/3/2005 CENTRAL CITIES SIGNS INC 286.62 AP - 00226016 8/3/2005 CENTRAL CITIES SIGNS INC 413.18 AP - 00226016 8/3/2005 CENTRAL CITIES SIGNS INC 700.00 AP - 00226016 8/3/2005 CENTRAL CITIES SIGNS INC 444.43 AP - 00226016 8/3/2005 CENTRAL CITIES SIGNS INC 94.90 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 12 Current Date: 08/10/200 Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:54:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 7/27/2005 through 8/9/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00226017 8/3/2005 CINGULAR WIRELESS 178.20 AP - 00226018 8/3/2005 CIRCUIT CITY 2,908.17 AP - 00226018 8/3/2005 CIRCUIT CI~ 499.00 AP - 00226018 8/3/2005 CIRCUIT CITY 10.98 AP - 00226019 8/3/2005 CITY RENTALS 300.40 AP - 00226019 8/3/2005 CYIY RENTALS 290.50 AP - 00226020 8/3/2005 CLAEYS, MICHAEL 750.00 AP - 00226021 8/3/2005 CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. 66.50 AP - 00226024 8/3/2005 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS ] 425.07 AP - 00226024 8/3/2005 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS ] 80.81 AP - 00226024 8/3/2005 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS ] 501.63 AP - 00226024 8/3/2005 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS ] 225.68 AP - 00226024 8/3/2005 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS } 217.62 AP - 00226024 8/3/2005 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS ! 363.66 AP - 00226024 8/3/2005 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS ] -429.92 AP - 00226025 8/3/2005 COPP CRUSHING COP, P, DAN 10.00 AP - 00226025 8/3/2005 COPP CRUSHING COP, P, DAN 10.00 AP - 00226027 8/3/2005 CSMFO 296.00 AP - 00226028 8/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 18,323.59 AP - 00226029 8/3/2005 D 7 CONSULTING INC 1,000.00 AP - 00226029 8/3/2005 D 7 CONSULTING INC 637.50 AP ~ 00226030 8/3/2005 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 571.08 AP - 00226030 8/3/2005 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 301.70 AP - 00226031 8/3/2005 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 3,800.00 AP - 00226032 8/3/2005 DATA2 INC 2,396.76 ' AP- 00226032 8/3/2005 DATA2 INC 1,589.77 AP - 00226033 8/3/2005 DEERE COMPANY, JOHN 26,852.18 AP - 00226034 8/3/2005 DEL MECHANICAL 138.28 AP - 00226034 8/3/2005 DEL MECHANICAL 412.56 AP - 00226035 8/3/2005 DMJM HARRIS 33,789.77 AP - 00226036 8/3/2005 DWS CONSTRUCTION 50.16 AP - 00226037 8/3/2005 EARL SCHEIB 280.08 AP - 00226038 8/3/2005 ECOLINE INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 331.09 AP - 00226039 8/3/2005 EMCOR SERVICE 8,393.76 AP - 00226039 8/3/2005 EMCOR SERVICE 4,775.69 AP - 00226039 8/3/2005 EMCOR SERVICE 7,457.74 AP - 00226040 8/3/2005 ENVIRONMENTAL RECOVERY SERVICES INC. 1,573.82 AP - 00226041 8/3/2005 ESRI INC 1,038.75 AP - 00226042 8/3/2005 EWlNG IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 924.44 AP - 00226042 8/3/2005 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 779.85 AP - 00226042 8/3/2005 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 546.30 AP - 00226042 8/3/2005 EWlNG IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 440.99 AP - 00226042 8/3/2005 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 177.55 AP - 00226042 8/3/2005 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 1,326.15 AP - 00226042 8/3/2005 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 885.16 AP - 00226043 8/3/2005 FASTENAL COMPANY 2,269.48 AP - 00226043 8/3/2005 FASTENAL COMPANY 140.36 AP - 00226044 8/3/2005 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 11.74 AP - 00226044 8/3/2005 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 18.01 AP - 00226044 8/3/2005 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 13.69 AP - 00226044 8/3/2005 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 17.44 AP - 00226044 8/3/2005 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.90 AP - 00226044 8/3/2005 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 28.60 AP - 00226045 8/3/2005 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 160.44 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 13 Current Date: 08/10/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:. ,,n08:54:2 / CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 7/27/2005 through 8/9/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00226046 8/3/2005 FIRST CENTENNIAL BANK 2,687.10 AP - 00226046 8/3/2005 FIRST CENTENNIAL BANK 413.40 AP - 00226046 8/3/2005 FIRST CENTENNIAL BANK 625.77 AP - 00226047 8/3/2005 FOREMOST 3,164.07 AP - 00226047 8/3/2005 FOREMOST 150.85 AP - 00226047 8/3/2005 FOREMOST 527.98 AP - 00226047 8/3/2005 FOREMOST 46.74 AP - 00226048 8/3/2005 G M BUSINESS INTERIORS 121.54 AP - 00226049 8/3/2005 GARRETT CONCRETE CORING AND SAWING lb 190.00 AP - 00226049 8/3/2005 GARRETT CONCRETE CORING AND SAWING IlX 840.00 AP - 00226050 8/3/2005 GOLF VENTURES WEST 18,228.07 AP - 00226050 8/3/2005 GOLF VENTURES WEST 234.94 AP - 00226050 8/3/2005 GOLF VENTURES WEST 17.20 AP - 00226050 8/3/2005 GOLF VENTURES WEST 8.49 AP - 00226051 8/3/2005 GR~INGER 416.51 AP - 00226051 8/3/2005 GRAINGER 23.44 AP - 00226051 8/3/2005 GRAINGER 23.73 AP - 00226051 8/3/2005 GRA1NGER 10.27 AP - 00226051 8/3/2005 GRAINGER 40.74 AP - 00226052 8/3/2005 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 206.87 AP - 00226052 8/3/2005 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 624.95 AP - 00226052 8/3/2005 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 258.59 AP - 00226053 8/3/2005 GREENWOOD'S UNIFORMS 19.34 AP - 00226054 8/3/2005 GYPSUM CONSTRUCTION INC 654.09 AP - 00226055 8/3/2005 HAM RADIO OUTLET 102.26 AP - 00226055 8/3/2005 HAM RADIO OUTLET 2,389.23 AP - 00226055 8/3/2005 HAM RADIO OUTLET 1,790.54 AP - 00226056 8/3/2005 HARRIGAN'S 130.28 AP - 00226057 8/3/2005 HCS CUTLER STEEL CO 389.60 AP - 00226058 8/3/2005 HENKELS MCCOY INC 202.50 AP - 00226059 8/3/2005 HIGHBRIDGE 15.16 AP - 00226061 8/3/2005 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 45.00 AP - 00226061 8/3/2005 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 389.52 AP - 00226061 8/3/2005 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 272.87 AP - 00226061 8/3/2005 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 302.29 AP - 00226061 8/3/2005 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 264.81 AP - 00226062 8/3/2005 HOLLISTER CONSTRUCTION 15,000.00 AP - 00226063 8/3/2005 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 20.13 AP - 00226063 8/3/2005 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 284.85 AP - 00226063 8/3/2005 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 68.74 AP - 00226063 8/3/2005 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 269.53 AP - 00226063 8/3/2005 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 20.00 AP - 00226063 8/3/2005 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 30.91 AP - 00226063 8/3/2005 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 29.14 AP - 00226063 8/3/2005 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 5.32 AP - 00226064 8/3/2005 HORSEPOWER & CHROME INC. 117.00 AP - 00226065 8/3/2005 HUB CONSTRUCTION SPECIALITIES INC 339.04 AP - 00226066 8/3/2005 HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES, Tt 3,265.32 AP - 00226067 8/3/2005 HUNTINGTON GLAZING 700.30 AP - 00226067 8/3/2005 HUNTINGTON GLAZING 73.81 AP - 00226067 8/3/2005 HUNTINGTON GLAZING -57.31 AP - 00226067 8/3/2005 HUNTINGTON GLAZING -7.38 AP - 00226067 8/3/2005 HUNTINGTON GLAZING -70.03 AP - 00226067 8/3/2005 HUNTINGTON GLAZING 573.08 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 14 Current Date: 08/10/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC _ CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Timel .I 08:54:2 / CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 7/27/2005 through 8/9/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00226068 8/3/2005 HUNTINGTON HARDWARE 72.42 AP - 00226069 8/3/2005 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 171.18 AP - 00226069 8/3/2005 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 1,160.65 AP - 00226069 8/3/2005 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 216.00 AP - 00226069 8/3/2005 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 12.48 AP - 00226069 8/3/2005 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 200.00 AP - 00226069 8/3/2005 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 300.87 AP - 00226070 8/3/2005 INTRAVAIA ROCK AND SAND INC 200.00 AP - 00226070 8/3/2005 INTRAVAIA ROCK AND SAND INC 1,684.13 AP - 00226070 8/3/2005 INTRAVAIA ROCK AND SAND INC 120.00 AP - 00226071 8/3/2005 IRON MOUNTAIN OSDP 408.25 AP - 00226072 8/3/2005 JONES AND MAYER LAW OFFICES OF 1,181.25 AP - 00226072 8/3/2005 JONES AND MAYER LAW OFFICES OF 1,943.75 AP - 00226073 8/3/2005 JONES, GLENDA 80.00 AP - 00226074 8/3/2005 JONES, RICHARD F 250.00 AP - 00226075 8/3/2005 KB ENGINEERING INC 1,000.00 AP - 00226076 8/3/2005 KC PRINTING & GRAPHICS INC 336.18 AP - 00226077 8/3/2005 KOCH MATERIALS COMPANY 137.42 AP - 00226078 8/3/2005 KRAMERS MASONRY 220.00 AP - 00226079 8/3/2005 LANCE SOLL AND LUNGHARD 11,100.00 AP - 00226080 8/3/2005 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 790.00 AP - 00226081 8/3/2005 LEWIS INVESTMENTS 20,014.00 AP - 00226082 8/3/2005 LIEBERT CASS1DY WHITMORE 150.00 AP - 00226082 8/3/2005 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 7,501.52 AP - 00226082 8/3/2005 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 325.00 AP - 00226086 8/3/2005 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 340.79 AP - 00226086 8/3/2005 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 15,786.26 AP - 00226086 8/3/2005 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 766.73 AP - 00226086 8/3/2005 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT 1NC 1,040.66 AP - 00226086 8/3/2005 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 5,029.69 AP - 00226086 8/3/2005 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 2,661.42 AP - 00226086 8/3/2005 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT 1NC 517.36 AP - 00226086 8/3/2005 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 4,454.75 AP - 00226087 8/3/2005 MARSHALL PLUMBING 157.00 AP - 00226087 8/3/2005 MARSHALL PLUMBING -39.25 AP - 00226088 8/3/2005 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 26.40 AP - 00226088 8/3/2005 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY ' 616.5 I AP - 00226088 8/3/2005 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 343.62 AP - 00226089 8/3/2005 MERIDIAN PACIFIC BUILDERS INC 1,000.00 AP - 00226089 8/3/2005 MERIDIAN PACIFIC BUILDERS INC 500.00 AP - 00226090 8/3/2005 MIDWEST TAPE 153.92 AP - 00226091 8/3/2005 MOTOROLA COMMUN AND ELEC INC 9,142.61 AP - 00226092 8/3/2005 MOUNTAIN VIEW GLASS AND MIRROR 419.81 AP - 00226093 8/3/2005 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 180.00 AP - 00226093 8/3/2005 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 38.12 AP - 00226093 8/3/2005 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 69.97 AP - 00226094 8/3/2005 NEC BUSINESS NETWORK SOLUTIONS INC 1,333.38 AP - 00226096 8/3/2005 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS 46.39 AP - 00226098 8/3/2005 NORDYKE'S BACKHOE SERVICE 1,000.00 AP - 00226099 8/3/2005 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIF(~ 156.61 AP - 00226099 8/3/2005 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIF,3 209.41 AP - 00226099 8/3/2005 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIF,3 89.35 AP - 00226099 8/3/2005 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIF(3 64.60 AP - 00226099 8/3/2005 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CAL1F~3 59.29 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 15 Current Date: 08/10/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portxait Layout Time: ~08:54:2 ! CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 7/27/2005 through 8/9/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00226099 8/3/2005 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFO 195.63 AP - 00226099 8/3/2005 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALiFG 202.82 AP - 00226100 8/3/2005 OCLC 1NC 43.68 AP - 00226102 8/3/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 22.61 AP - 00226102 8/3/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 21.68 AP - 00226102 8/3/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 30.21 AP - 00226102 8/3/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 93.86 AP - 00226102 8/3/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 116.05 AP - 00226102 8/3/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 35.00 AP - 00226102 8/3/2005 OFFICE DEPOT · -58.02 AP - 00226102 8/3/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 310.32 AP - 00226102 8/3/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 15.52 AP - 00226102 8/3/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 58.02 AP - 00226102 8/3/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 12.45 AP - 00226102 8/3/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 7.80 AP - 00226102 8/3/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 1,044.78 AP - 00226102 8/3/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 13.79 AP ~ 00226102 8/3/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 11.06 AP - 00226102 8/3/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 151.30 AP - 00226102 8/3/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 34.39 AP - 00226102 8/3/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 122.55 AP - 00226102 8/3/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 249.26 AP - 00226102 8/3/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 5.82 AP - 00226102 8/3/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 19.16 AP - 00226102 8/3/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 57.93 AP - 00226102 8/3/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 81.33 AP - 00226102 8/3/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 7.52 AP - 00226102 8/3/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 133.02 AP - 00226102 8/3/2005 OFFICE DEPOT -57.93 AP - 00226102 8/3/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 240.01 AP - 00226102 8/3/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 160.19 AP - 00226102 8/3/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 816.22 AP - 00226102 8/3/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 70.73 AP - 00226102 8/3/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 81.34 AP - 00226102 8/3/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 403.65 AP - 00226102 8/3/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 23.31 AP - 00226102 8/3/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 7.50 AP - 00226102 8/3/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 56.55 AP - 00226102 8/3/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 150.75 AP - 00226102 8/3/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 67.87 AP - 00226102 8/3/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 53.00 AP - 00226102 8/3/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 200.00 AP - 00226102 8/3/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 311.79 AP - 00226102 8/3/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 445.88 AP - 00226102 8/3/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 494.10 AP - 00226102 8/3/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 22.09 AP - 00226102 8/3/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 40.71 AP - 00226102 8/3/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 25.64 AP - 00226102 8/3/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 1,174.39 AP - 00226102 8/3/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 454.40 AP - 00226102 8/3/2005 OFFICE DEPOT -23.27 AP - 00226102 8/3/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 62.90 AP - 00226102 8/3/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 32.75 AP - 00226102 8/3/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 29.47 User: VL~)PEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 16 Current Date: 08/10/200 Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:./08:54:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 7/27/2005 through 8/9/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00226102 8/3/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 104.43 AP - 00226102 8/3/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 26.85 AP - 00226102 8/3/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 80.25 AP - 00226102 8/3/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 32.52 AP - 00226102 8/3/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 65.19 AP - 00226102 8/3/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 18.42 AP - 00226102 8/3/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 302.41 AP - 00226104 8/3/2005 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 17.23 AP - 00226105 8/3/2005 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 865.75 AP - 00'526105 8/3/2005 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 47.70 AP - 00226105 8/3/2005 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 842.05 AP - 00226105 8/3/2005 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 128.00 AP 00226105 8/3/2005 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 128.00 AP 00226105 8/3/2005 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 41.04 AP 00226105 8/3/2005 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 206.64 AP 00226105 8/3/2005 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 1,807.61 AP 00226106 8/3/2005 OWEN ELECTRIC 655.10 AP 00226106 8/3/2005 OWEN ELECTRIC 340.27 AP 00226106 8/3/2005 OWEN ELECTRIC 386.74 AP 00226106 8/3/2005 OWEN ELECTRIC 45.13 AP 00226107 8/3/2005 PACIFIC EQUIP AND IRRIGATION INC 884.77 AP 00226107 8/3/2005 PACIFIC EQUIP AND IRRIGATION 1NC 216.28 AP 00226108 8/3/2005 PATTON SALES CORP 155.13 AP 00226108 8/3/2005 PATTON SALES CORP 1,030.84 AP 00226108 8/3/2005 PATTON SALES CORP 6,917.55 AP 00226108 8/3/2005 PATTON SALES CORP 413.20 AP 00226109 8/3/2005 PHOENIX GROUP INFORMATION SYSTEMS 490.28 AP 00226110 8/3/2005 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 11,528.16 AP 00226110 8/3/2005 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 8,629.14 AP 00226110 8/3/2005 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 8,347.97 AP 00226110 8/3/2005 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 11,916.42 AP 00226111 8/3/2005 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION INC 598.64 AP 00226112 8/3/2005 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 25.00 AP 00226112 8/3/2005 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 25.00 AP 00226112 8/3/2005 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 25.00 AP 00226112 8/3/2005 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 25.00 AP 00226112 8/3/2005 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 25.00 AP 00226112 8/3/2005 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEl 25.00 AP 00226112 8/3/2005 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 25.00 AP 00226112 8/3/2005 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEi 25.00 AP 00226112 8/3/2005 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 25.00 AP 00226112 8/3/2005 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 30.00 AP 00226114 8/3/2005 REPUBLIC ELECTRIC 1,053.63 AP 00226114 8/3/2005 REPUBLIC ELECTRIC 748.56 AP 00226114 8/3/2005 REPUBLIC ELECTRIC 5,301.56 AP 00226114 8/3/2005 REPUBLIC ELECTRIC 6,306.55 AP 00226114 8/3/2005 REPUBLIC ELECTRIC 6,272.04 AP 00226114 8/3/2005 REPUBLIC ELECTRIC 1,202.05 AP 00226114 8/3/2005 REPUBLIC ELECTRIC 1,471.16 AP 00226115 8/3/2005 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 1,548.40 AP 00226115 8/3/2005 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 5,245.60 AP - 00226115 8/3/2005 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 30.00 AP - 00226115 8/3/2005 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 5,164.34 AP - 00226115 8/3/2005 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 19,410.18 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 17 Current Date: 08/10/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Porlxait Layout Time: 08:54:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 7/27/2005 through 8/9/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00226115 8/3/2005 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 765.87 AP - 00226115 8/3/2005 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 325.77 AP - 00226115 8/3/2005 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 3,766.41 AP - 00226115 8/3/2005 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 347.23 AP - 00226115 8/3/2005 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 640.00 AP - 00226115 8/3/2005 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 228.80 AP - 00226115 8/3/2005 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 10,940.43 AP - 00226115 8/3/2005 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 10,388.79 AP - 00226115 8/3/2005 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 2,853.43 AP - 00226115 8/3/2005 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 188.40 AP - 00226115 8/3/2005 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 813.97 AP - 00226115 8/3/2005 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 90.00 AP - 00226115 8/3/2005 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 156.00 AP - 00226116 8/3/2005 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 33.65 AP - 00226116 8/3/2005 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 113.89 AP - 00226116 8/3/2005 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 45.15 AP - 00226116 8/3/2005 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 69.50 AP - 00226117 8/3/2005 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 452,208.41 AP - 00226117 8/3/2005 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 12,433.99 AP - 00226117 8/3/2005 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ~;5,220.84 AP - 00226117 8/3/2005 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY -1,243.40 AP - 00226118 8/3/2005 RODRIGUEZ 1NC, R Y 268.75 AP - 00226119 8/3/2005 S AND K ENGINEERS 1,540.00 AP - 00226119 8/3/2005 S AND K ENGINEERS 330.00 AP - 00226120 8/3/2005 SAN ANTONIO MATERIALS ' 99.69 AP - 00226121 8/3/2005 SAN BERNARDINO cOUNTY 96.44 AP - 00226122 8/3/2005 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 3,694.80 AP - 00226122 8/3/2005 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 40,870.52 AP - 00226123 8/3/2005 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 29,691.55 AP - 00226124 8/3/2005 SAN BEKNARDINO COUNTY 484.88 AP - 00226125 8/3/2005 SAN BERNARD1NO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT 5,081.23 AP - 00226126 8/3/2005 SAN BERNARDINO, CITY OF 600.00 AP - 00226126 8/3/2005 SAN BEKNARD1NO, CITY OF 600.00 AP - 00226127 8/3/2005 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 3,563.99 AP - 00226127 8/3/2005 SiMPLOT PARTNERS 5,023.31 AP - 00226127 8/3/2005 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 506.75 AP - 00226127 8/3/2005 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 1,128.14 AP - 00226128 8/3/2005 SKYLINE ORANGE COUNTY 2,158.55 AP - 00226128 8/3/2005 SKYLINE ORANGE COUNTY 684.97 AP - 00226129 8/3/2005 SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES 44.74 AP - 00226129 8/3/2005 SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES 550.00 AP - 00226129 8/3/2005 SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES 2,705.26 AP - 00226130 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,259.61 AP - 00226131 8/3/2005 SOUTHLAND CAR COUNTERS 2,135.00 AP - 00226132 8/3/2005 SOUTHWEST MOBILE STORAGE 1NC 175.60 AP - 00226133 8/3/2005 SPECTRA COMPANY 2,974.00 AP - 00226134 8/3/2005 SPINITAR 55,437.73 AP - 00226135 8/3/2005 SPORT SUPPLY GROUP INC 341.22 AP - 00226135 8/3/2005 SPORT SUPPLY GROUP INC 314.37 AP - 00226136 8/3/2005 STERICYCLE INC 262.67 AP - 00226137 8/3/2005 TANGRAM INTERIORS 4,787.05 AP - 00226138 8/3/2005 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS 479.65 AP - 00226138 8/3/2005 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS 42.25 AP - 00226139 8/3/2005 THE EXCHANGE ONTARIO CENTER INC 1,000.00 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 18 Current Date: 08/10/200 Report:CK AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:. s,x 08:54:2 l CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 7/27/2005 through 8/9/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00226139 8/3/2005 THE EXCHANGE ONTARIO CENTER INC 5,000.00 AP - 00226140 8/3/2005 THOMSON GALE 26.62 AP - 00226141 8/3/2005 TOMARK SPORTS ]NC 191.99 AP - 00226142 8/3/2005 TRANSAMERICAN SOIL SERVICES ]NC 831.36 AP - 00226144 8/3/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 23,112.28 AP - 00226144 8/3/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 15,954.64 AP 00226144 8/3/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 603.34 AP 00226144 8/3/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 1,075.75 AP 00226144 8/3/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 823.49 AP 00226144 8/3/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 2,440.68 AP 00226144 8/3/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 477.92 AP 00226144 8/3/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 1,371.04 AP 00226144 8/3/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 12,218.23 AP 00226144 8/3/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 15,954.64 AP 00226144 8/3/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 50.37 AP 00226144 8/3/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 18,964.86 AP 00226144 8/3/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 66,675.73 AP 00226144 8/3/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 23,112.28 AP 00226144 8/3/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 2,286.19 AP 00226144 8/3/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 4,789.39 AP 00226144 8/3/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 1,462.98 AP 00226144 8/3/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCAKE 764.83 AP 00226144 8/3/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 580.51 AP 00226144 8/3/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 1,459.76 AP 00226144 8/3/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 2,000.00 AP 00226144 8/3/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 7,600.00 AP 00226144 8/3/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 9,300.00 AP 00226144 8/3/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 1,000.00 AP 00226144 8/3/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 31,500.00 AP 00226144 8/3/2005 TRUGREEN LANE)CARE 12,554.00 AP 00226144 8/3/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 21,150.00 AP 00226144 8/3/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 7,174.59 AP 00226144 8/3/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 2,808.47 AP 00226144 8/3/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 49.34 AP 00226144 8/3/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 248.06 AP 00226144 8/3/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 2,826.58 AP 00226144 8/3/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 1,128.76 AP 00226144 8/3/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 603.34 AP 00226144 8/3/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 14,808.94 AP 00226144 8/3/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 248.06 AP 00226144 8/3/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 1,128.76 AP 00226144 8/3/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCAILE 14,808.94 AP 00226144 8/3/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 50.37 AP 00226144 8/3/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCAKE 65,915.89 AP 00226144 8/3/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 18,964.86 AP 00226145 8/3/2005 UNDERGROUND TECHNOLOGY ]NC 447.30 AP 00226145 8/3/2005 UNDERGROUND TECHNOLOGY ]NC 478.80 AP 00226145 8/3/2005 UNDERGROUND TECHNOLOGY ]NC 656.40 AP 00226145 8/3/2005 UNDERGROUND TECHNOLOGY INC 398.00 AP 00226146 8/3/2005 UNIQUE MANAGEMENT SERVICES ]NC 716.04 AP - 00226147 8/3/2005 UNITED PUMPING SERVICE ]NC 1,500.50 AP - 00226148 8/3/2005 UNITED RENTALS NORTHWEST ]NC 974.84 AP - 00226149 8/3/2005 UPSCO POWERSAFE SYSTEMS ]NC 1,797.27 AP - 00226150 8/3/2005 UPS 17.07 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 19 Current Date: 08/10/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:. ~a. 08:54:2 I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 7/27/2005 through 8/9/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00226152 8/3/2005 VERDICON INC 1,627.03 AP 00226153 8/3/2005 VERIZON 67.89 AP 00226154 8/3/2005 VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY 571.09 AP 00226154 8/3/2005 VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY 733.58 AP 00226154 8/3/2005 VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY 249.98 AP 00226154 8/3/2005 VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY 124.82 AP 00226154 8/3/2005 VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY 107.75 AP 00226154 8/3/2005 VULCAN MATERIALS cOMPANY 357.02 AP 00226155 8/3/2005 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 248.38 AP 00226155 8/3/2005 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 72.78 AP 00226155 8/3/2005 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 68.27 AP 00226155 8/3/2005 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 118.89 AP 00226155 8/3/2005 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 186.23 AP 00226155 8/3/2005 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 1,400.46 AP 00226155 8/3/2005 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 22.63 AP - 00226155 8/3/2005 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 22.09 AP - 00226155 8/3/2005 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 407.30 AP - 00226155 8/3/2005 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 154.52 AP - 00226156 8/3/2005 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 136.16 AP - 00226156 8/3/2005 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 178.00 AP - 00226156 8/3/2005 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 526.44 AP - 00226156 8/3/2005 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 49.92 AP 00226156 8/3/2005 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 890.00 AP 00226156 8/3/2005 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 2,235.09 AP 00226156 8/3/2005 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 935.85 AP 00226156 8/3/2005 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 347.56 AP 00226156 8/3/2005 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 347.56 AP 00226156 8/3/2005 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 641.25 AP 00226156 8/3/2005 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 154.90 AP 00226156 8/3/2005 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 66.43 AP 00226156 8/3/2005 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 270.00 AP 00226156 8/3/2005 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 501.97 AP 00226156 8/3/2005 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 4,094.50 AP 00226156 8/3/2005 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 501.97 AP 00226157 8/3/2005 WEST COAST TURF 488.76 AP 00226158 8/3/2005 WEST END MATERIAL SUPPLY 213.38 AP 00226158 8/3/2005 WEST END MATERIAL SUPPLY 461.17 AP 00226159 8/3/2005 WEST PAYMENT CENTER 257.95 AP 00226159 8/3/2005 WEST PAYMENT CENTER 194.35 AP 00226160 8/3/2005 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 78.54 AP - 00226160 8/3/2005 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 139.70 AP - 00226160 8/3/2005 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 64.02 AP - 00226160 8/3/2005 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 114.62 AP - 00226160 8/3/2005 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 60.50 AP - 00226161 8/3/2005 WEST VALLEY SENIOR CONCERN 3,000.00 AP - 00226162 8/3/2005 WESTERN HIGHWAY PRODUCTS INC 476.92 AP - 00226163 8/3/2005 WHITE CAP CONST SUPPLY 239.90 AP - 00226164 8/3/2005 WHITTIER FERTILIZER 953.59 AP - 00226165 8/3/2005 WINSTAR DEVELOPMENT 500.00 AP - 00226166 8/3/2005 XEROX CORPORATION 1,659.82 AP - 00226168 8/3/2005 A AND K 30 MIN PHOTO LAB INC 6.62 AP - 00226169 8/3/2005 ABBIT, JEFF 300.00 AP - 00226170 8/3/2005 ABLAC 16.39 AP - 00226171 8/3/2005 ABLETRONICS 111.83 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 20 Current Date: 08/10/200 Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time~08:54:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 7/27/2005 through 8/9/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00226172 8/3/2005 ADAMSON, RONALD 990.00 AP 00226173 8/3/2005 ALLIANCE BUS LINES INC 545.36 AP 00226173 8/3/2005 ALLIANCE BUS LINES [NC 653.13 AP 00226173 8/3/2005 ALLIANCE BUS LINES [NC 409.02 AP 00226174 8/3/2005 ALMBLAD, KENNETH 52.50 AP 00226175 8/3/2005 ALTA FIRE EQUIPMENT CO 38.55 AP 00226175 8/3/2005 ALTA FIRE EQUIPMENT CO 134.69 AP 00226176 8/3/2005 ALTA LOMA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATES 1,833.00 AP 00226177 8/3/2005 ARROWHEAD MOUNTAiN SPRING WATER 39.18 AP 00226178 8/3/2005 AUTO BODY 2000 852.50 AP 00226179 8/3/2005 BRYANT, THORIACE 250.00 AP 00226180 8/3/2005 BURR CYCLES INC, JOHN 336.33 AP 00226180 8/3/2005 BURR CYCLES INC, JOHN 504.01 AP 00226181 8/3/2005 CAL PERS LONG TERM CARE 231.92 AP 00226182 8/3/2005 CAMPANA, REBECCA 400.00 AP 00226183 8/3/2005 CERTIFIED AUTO CARE 62.13 AP 00226183 8/3/2005 CERTIFIED AUTO CARE 49.95 AP 00226183 8/3/2005 CERTIFIED AUTO CARE 49.95 AP 00226184 8/3/2005 CHRISP COMPANY 15.00 AP 00226185 8/3/2005 CLABBY, SANDRA 1,000.00 AP 00226~ 86 8/3/2005 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 19.47 AP 00226189 8/3/2005 CUCAMQNGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 176.48 AP 00226189 8/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 732.08 AP 00226189 8/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,191.68 AP 00226189 8/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 115.88 AP 00226189 8/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 123.08 AP 00226189 8/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 740.48 AP - 00226189 8/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,671.68 AP - 00226189 8/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 3,034.49 AP - 00226189 8/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 425.15 AP - 00226189 8/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 191.82 AP - 00226189 8/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,828.88 AP - 00226189 8/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 361.28 AP - 00226189 8/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 232.88 AP - 00226189 8/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 754.88 AP - 00226189 8/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 243.68 AP - 00226189 8/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 161.48 AP - 00226189 8/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 274.88 AP - 00226189 8/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 139.28 AP - 00226189 8/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 288.08 AP - 00226189 8/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 215.48 AP - 00226189 8/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 264.08 AP - 00226189 8/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 17.78 AP - 00226189 8/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 446.48 AP - 00226189 8/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 610.88 AP - 00226189 8/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 185.73 AP - 00226189 8/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,633.28 AP - 00226189 8/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,267.49 AP - 00226189 8/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,267.50 AP - 00226189 8/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.60 AP - 00226189 8/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 4,251.43 AP - 00226189 8/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 3,722.23 AP - 00226189 8/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,994.74 AP - 00226189 8/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 177.08 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 21 Current Date: 08/10/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Port~ait Layout Time: 08:54:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 7/27/2005 through 8/9/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00226189 8/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 153.68 AP 00226189 8/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 139.28 AP 00226189 8/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 357.04 AP 00226189 8/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 357.04 AP 00226189 8/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,131.08 AP 00226189 8/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 739.28 AP - 00226189 8/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 210.08 AP - 00226189 8/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 535.28 AP - 00226189 8/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 849.66 AP - 00226189 8/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,059.38 AP - 00226189 8/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 80.68 AP - 00226189 8/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 521.48 AP - 00226189 8/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 762.68 AP - 00226189 8/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 101.68 AP - 00226189 8/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 32.18 AP - 00226189 8/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 420.08 AP - 00226189 8/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 5,400.98 AP - 00226189 8/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 347.35 AP - 00226189 8/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 192.03 AP - 00226189 8/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 141.88 AP 00226189 8/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 147.88 AP 00226189 8/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2,143.85 AP 00226189 8/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 196.88 AP 00226189 8/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 96.08 AP 00226189 8/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 166.88 AP 00226189 8/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 466.88 AP 00226189 8/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 110.48 AP 00226189 8/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 160.88 AP 00226189 8/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 276.08 AP 00226189 8/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 405.68 AP 00226189 8/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.60 AP 00226189 8/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 127.84 AP 00226189 8/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 180.08 AP 00226189 8/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER. DISTRICT 324.08 AP 00226189 8/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 134.48 AP - 00226189 8/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 372.68 AP - 00226189 8/3/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 138.28 AP - 00226191 8/3/2005 DAPPER TIRE CO ' 91.48 AP - 00226191 8/3/2005 DAPPER TIRE CO 716.74 AP - 00226191 8/3/2005 DAPPER TIRE CO 40.08 AP - 00226192 8/3/2005 DEER CREEK CAR CARE CENTER 100.00 AP - 00226192 8/3/2005 DEER CREEK CAR CARE CENTER 100.00 AP - 00226192 8/3/2005 DEER CREEK CAR CARE CENTER 100.00 AP - 00226193 8/3/2005 DELEISE, JENAE 519.24 AP - 00226194 8/3/2005 DIAMOND KINGS 2,500.00 AP - 00226194 8/3/2005 DIAMOND KINGS 469.00 AP - 00226195 8/3/2005 DPDG FUND III LLC 50.00 AP - 00226196 8/3/2005 DRACHAND, MELISSA 297.00 AP - 00226197 8/3/2005 DREAMSHAPERS 250.00 AP - 00226198 8/3/2005 EASTER, PAMELA 49.93 AP - 00226201 8/3/2005 EXCLUSIVE EMAGES 29.09 AP - 00226201 8/3/2005 EXCLUSIVE EMAGES 48.48 AP - 00226202 8/3/2005 EZ RENTALS 4,406.48 AP - 00226203 8/3/2005 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 11.64 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 22 Current Date: 08/10/200 Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:54:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 7/27/2005 through 8/9/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00226203 8/3/2005 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 17.70 AP - 00226205 8/3/2005 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 840.00 AP - 00226205 8/3/2005 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 868.00 AP - 00226205 8/3/2005 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 569.50 AP - 00226205 8/3/2005 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 630.00 AP - 00226205 8/3/2005 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 651.00 AP ~ 00226207 8/3/2005 FORD OF UPLAND INC 261.12 AP - 00226207 8/3/2005 FORD OF UPLAND INC 37.08 AP - 00226207 8/3/2005 FORD OF UPLAND INC 392.12 AP - 00226207 8/3/2005 FORD OF UPLAND INC 641.36 AP - 00226208 8/3/2005 FOREST CITY CALIFORNIA COMMERCIAL 523,674.50 AP - 00226209 8/3/2005 FUKUSHIMA, JUDITH 1,290.00 AP - 00226211 8/3/2005 H1NRICHSEN, BARBARA 2,500.00 AP - 00226213 8/3/2005 iNFORMATION TECHNOLOGY GROUP 1,194.50 AP - 00226214 8/3/2005 IRRIGATOR TECH TRAINING SCHOOL 200.00 AP - 00226215 8/3/2005 JONES, BOB 1,280.00 AP - 00226216 8/3/2005 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC 72,629.60 AP - 00226216 8/3/2005 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC 931.24 AP - 00226217 8/3/2005 KRAKOWER & ASSOCIATES 990.00 AP - 00226218 8/3/2005 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 600.00 AP - 00226219 8/3/2005 LIQUOR LAND II 219.31 AP - 00226220 8/3/2005 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 100.00 AP - 00226221 8/3/2005 LYON, LISA 500.00 AP - 00226222 8/3/2005 MAIN STREET TOURS 1,580.00 AP - 00226223 8/3/2005 MANSOURI MSCE PE, IRAJ 2,400.00 AP - 00226224 8/3/2005 MART1NEZ UNION SERVICE 45.00 AP - 00226225 8/3/2005 MASTER BRAND CABINETS 224.26 AP - 00226226 8/3/2005 MATHIS AND ASSOCIATES 3,200.00 AP - 00226227 8/3/2005 MCCULLOUGH PLUMBING INC 200.00 AP - 00226229 8/3/2005 MOBILE PC 12.00 AP - 00226230 8/3/2005 MONTE SAN SAVINO LLC 4,737.00 AP - 00226232 8/3/2005 NATIONAL ASSOC OF TOWN WATCH 484.50 AP - 00226233 8/3/2005 NATIONAL DEFERRED 17,480.12 AP - 00226234 8/3/2005 NEWMEDIA CONSULTING INC 449.87 AP - 00226235 8/3/2005 NIELSEN, NETTIE 300.00 AP - 00226236 8/3/2005 O C B REPROGRAPHICS [NC 41.89 AP - 00226237 8/3/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 3.60 AP - 00226237 8/3/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 24.60 AP - 00226237 8/3/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 102.13 AP - 00226237 8/3/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 54.88 AP - 00226237 8/3/2005 OFFICE DEPOT -7.42 AP - 00226237 8/3/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 119.76 AP - 00226237 8/3/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 7.61 AP - 00226239 8/3/2005 P A P A 155.00 AP - 00226240 8/3/2005 PACIFIC COAST ROOFING & CONSTRUCTION 1~ 465.80 AP - 00226241 8/3/2005 PACIFIC PLASTIC TECHNOLOGY INC 247.22 AP - 00226242 8/3/2005 PEP BOYS 12.90 AP - 00226242 8/3/2005 PEP BOYS 27.95 AP - 00226242 8/3/2005 PEP BOYS 71.61 AP - 00226243 8/3/2005 PERFORMANCE AUTO BODY 661.09 AP - 00226243 8/3/2005 PERFORMANCE AUTO BODY 661.08 AP - 00226244 8/3/2005 POP, AC 230.00 AP - 00226245 8/3/2005 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 6.81 AP - 00226246 8/3/2005 PRINCIPAL LIFE 1,818.15 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 23 Current Date: 08/10/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:_ ~08:54:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 7/27/2005 through 8/9/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name. Amount AP - 00226247 8/3/2005 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 7.00 AP - 00226247 8/3/2005 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 7.00 AP - 00226248 8/3/2005 RANCH DEVELOPMENT GROUP LLC, THE 136.00 AP - 00226249 8/3/2005 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEi 45.00 AP - 00226249 8/3/2005 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMME1 45.00 AP - 00226249 8/3/2005 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 45.00 AP - 00226249 8/3/2005 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 45.00 AP - 00226249 8/3/2005 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 45.00 AP - 00226249 8/3/2005 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 45.00 AP - 00226249 8/3/2005 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 15.00 AP - 00226249 8/3/2005 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 25.00 AP - 00226250 8/3/2005 RANCHO CUCAMONGA QUAKES PROFESSIONP 50.00 AP - 00226251 8/3/2005 RANCHO MAGNUM RANGE 87,00 AP - 00226252 8/3/2005 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 7.00 AP - 00226252 8/3/2005 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 4.31 AP - 00226253 8/3/2005 RCPFA 7,171.13 AP - 00226254 8/3/2005 REIMERS MOBILE SERVICE, TROY 551.15 AP - 00226255 8/3/2005 RE1NHARDT, RITA 360.00 AP - 00226257 8/3/2005 REYES, CRISTINA 56.00 AP - 00226258 8/3/2005 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 492.21 AP - 00226259 8/3/2005 RIGELMAN, TONI 60.00 AP - 00226260 8/3/2005 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 101.82 AP - 00226261 8/3/2005 RODRIGUEZ, MARIA 40.00 AP - 00226262 8/3/2005 ROSS, NALITA 14.00 AP - 00226263 8/3/2005 SALOMON, ESTHER 92.00 AP - 00226264 8/3/2005 SAMPLES, KRISTY 25.92 AP - 00226264 8/3/2005 SAMPLES, KRISTY 30.78 AP - 00226265 8/3/2005 SAN ANTONIO COMMUNITY HOSPITAL 2,428.15 AP - 00226267 8/3/2005 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT 6,074.45 AP - 00226268 8/3/2005 SBC 56.12 AP - 00226268 8/3/2005 SBC 56.12 AP - 00226268 8/3/2005 SBC 1,360.93 AP - 00226269 8/3/2005 SCACEO 130.00 AP - 00226270 8/3/2005 SCAN NATOA ~ 75.00 AP - 00226271 8/3/2005 SEGWAY ORANGE COUNTY 15,668.11 AP - 00226272 8/3/2005 SHANKEL, CHRISTINE 40.00 AP - 00226273 8/3/2005 SIGN SHOP, THE 75.43 AP - 00226274 8/3/2005 SILVERIA, DENNIS 36.00 AP - 00226275 8/3/2005 SLJ PRO AUDIO SERVICES 400.00 AP - 00226276 8/3/2005 SMART AND FINAL 26.58 AP - 00226276 8/3/2005 SMART AND FINAL 67.29 AP - 00226276 8/3/2005 SMART AND FINAL 175.27 AP - 00226277 8/3/2005 SMITH, ANNA 40.00 AP - 00226278 8/3/2005 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 92.43 AP - 00226278 8/3/2005 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 1,242.02 AP - 00226279 8/3/2005 $OTO, LORI 25.00 AP - 00226280 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOC OF GOV 12,167.00 AP - 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 54,706.51 AP - 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 0.39 AP - 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 441.69 AP - 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.04 AP - 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.10 AP ~ 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ' 13.14 AP - 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 3.83 User: VLOPEZ- Veronica Lopez Page: 24 Current Date: 08/10/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Porffait Layout Time:.,, . ~08:54:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 7/27/2005 through 8/9/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.05 AP - 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.04 AP - 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 31,447.11 AP - 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 96.33 AP - 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.87 AP - 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 80.85 AP - 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 101.08 AP - 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.66 AP - 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 81.37 AP - 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 149.25 AP - 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.10 AP - 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.11 AP - 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 111.10 AP - 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.23 AP - 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.39 AP - 00226283 8/3/2005~ SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 48.87 AP - 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.04 AP - 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 125.85 AP - 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 476.90 AP - 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.64 AP - 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.21 AP - 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.85 AP - 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 107.96 AP - 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 246.36 AP - 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.65 AP - 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 132.44 AP - 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 564.86 AP - 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 5.70 AP - 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.29 AP - 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.93 AP - 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 50.37 AP - 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 42.82 AP - 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 50.36 AP - 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 139.00 AP - 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 91.61 AP - 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 79.66 AP - 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 255.55 AP - 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 115.92 AP - 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 84.70 AP - 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.04 AP - 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.04 AP - 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 103.78 AP - 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 93.19 AP 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.42 AP 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.52 AP 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 99.12 AP 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 124.69 AP 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 271.97 AP 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 46.51 AP 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 81.77 AP 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 138.78 AP - 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 167.48 AP - 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.91 AP - 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 152.91 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 25 Current Date: 08/10/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:54:2 25 . CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 7/27/2005 through 8/9/2005 Check No. Check Date. Vendor Name Amount AP 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 107.30 AP 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 90.94 AP 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 120.34 AP 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.46 AP 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.63 AP 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.46 AP - 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.29 AP - 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.95 AP - 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 70.37 AP - 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 95.64 AP - 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 36.40 AP - 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.89 AP - 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 104.42 AP - 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.71 AP - 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.23 AP - 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.83 AP - 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.51 AP - 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.04 AP - 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.71 AP - 00226283 8/3/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.13 AP - 00226284 8/3/2005 SOUTHLAND SPORTS OFFICIALS 839.58 AP - 00226285 8/3/2005 SPAGGI'S 3,103.20 AP - 00226286 8/3/2005 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY 435.36 AP - 00226287 8/3/2005 STEFFEN, JOHANNA 130.00 AP - 00226288 8/3/2005 STOKES, BRIDGETTE 40.00 AP - 00226290 8/3/2005 SWANK MOTION PICTURES INC 337.28 AP - 00226290 8/3/2005 SWANK MOTION PICTURES INC 271.00 AP - 00226291 8/3/2005 SYMETRA LIFE INSURANCE COM?ANY 1,818.00 AP - 00226292 8/3/2005 THEATRE COMPANY, THE 52.50 AP - 00226292 8/3/2005 THEATRE COMPANY, THE 5,000.00 AP - 00226293 8/3/2005 THOMAS, KIMBERLY 17.61 AP - 00226294 8/3/2005 TMCI 1NC 122.01 AP - 00226296 8/3/2005 TURCH AND ASSOCIATES, DAVID 4,000.00 AP - 00226297 8/3/2005 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P~ 2,857.60 AP - 00226297 8/3/2005 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P, 33,574.18 AP - 00226298 8/3/2005 UNITED ELECTRIC 66.20 AP - 00226299 8/3/2005 UNITED WAY 46.00 AP - 00226301 8/3/2005 UP TIL 4 MUSIC 100.00 AP - 00226302 8/3/2005 UPS 69.26 AP - 00226305 8/3/2005 VERIZON 83.37 AP - 00226305 8/3/2005 VERIZON 206.98 AP - 00226305 8/3/2005 VERIZON 467.75 AP - 00226305 8/3/2005 VERIZON 48.16 AP - 00226305 8/3/2005 VERIZON 781.44 AP - 00226305 8/3/2005 VERIZON 29.74 AP - 00226305 8/3/2005 VERIZON 29.75 AP - 00226305 8/3/2005 VERIZON 56.61 AP - 00226305 8/3/2005 VERIZON 52.65 AP - 00226305 8/3/2005 VERIZON 495.62 AP - 00226305 8/3/2005 VERIZON 392.12 AP - 00226305 8/3/2005 VERIZON 4.69 AP - 00226305 8/3/2005 VERIZON 92.04 AP - 00226305 8/3/2005 VERIZON 92.05 AP - 00226305 8/3/2005 VERIZON 92.05 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 26 Current Date: 08/10/200 Report:CK AGENDA_REG PORTKAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Timeb.~, 08:54:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 7/27/2005 through 8/9/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00226305 8/3/2005 VERiZON 27.49 AP - 00226305 8/3/2005 VEP-~IZON 29.78 AP - 00226305 8/3/2005 VERIZON 56.74 AP - 00226305 8/3/2005 VEP~IZON 20.89 AP - 00226305 8/3/2005 VEKIZON 29.27 AP - 00226305 8/3/2005 VERIZON 20.56 AP - 00226305 8/3/2005 VERIZON 31.36 AP - 00226305 8/3/2005 VERIZON 133.13 AP - 00226305 8/3/2005 VERIZON 47.41 AP - 00226305 8/3/2005 VERIZON 28.75 AP - 00226305 8/3/2005 VERIZON 28.30 AP - 00226305 8/3/2005 VERIZON 1.24 AP - 00226305 8/3/2005 VERIZON 92.05 AP - 00226305 8/3/2005 VERIZON 92.04 AP - 00226305 8/3/2005 VERIZON 20.56 AP - 00226305 8/3/2005 VE1LIZON 92.04 AP - 00226305 8/3/2005 VERIZON 20.56 AP - 00226305 8/3/2005 VEKIZON 30.65 AP - 00226305 8/3/2005 VERIZON 20.56 AP - 00226305 8/3/2005 VERIZON 408.16 AP - 00226305 8/3/2005 VERIZON 29.95 AP - 00226305 8/3/2005 VERIZON 60.12 AP - 00226305 8/3/2005 VERIZON 29.75 AP - 00226305 8/3/2005 VERIZON 29.27 AP - 00226305 8/3/2005 VERIZON 143.40 AP - 00226305 8/3/2005 VERIZON 150.37 AP - 00226305 8/3/2005 VERIZON 29.27 AP - 00226305 8/3/2005 VERIZON 28.42 AP - 00226305 ' 8/3/2005 VERIZON 21.24 AP - 00226305 8/3/2005 VERIZON 28.76 AP - 00226305 8/3/2005 VEPdZON 29.74 AP - 00226305 8/3/2005 VERIZON 322.04 AP - 00226305 8/3/2005 VERIZON 20.56 AP - 00226305 8/3/2005 VERIZON 28.76 AP - 00226305 8/3/2005 VERIZON 20.56 AP - 00226305 8/3/2005 VERIZON 20.56 AP - 00226305 8/3/2005 VERIZON 28.31 AP - 00226305 8/3/2005 VERIZON 29.27 AP - 00226305 8/3/2005 VERIZON 174.39 AP - 00226305 8/3/2005 VERIZON 28.76 AP - 00226305 8/3/2005 VERIZON 59.51 AP - 00226305 8/3/2005 VERIZON 89.24 AP - 00226305 8/3/2005 VERIZON 28.30 AP - 00226305 8/3/2005 VERIZON 28.69 AP - 00226305 8/3/2005 V£R/ZON 467.75 AP - 00226305 8/3/2005 VERIZON 574.95 AP - 00226305 8/3/2005 VERIZON 78.06 AP - 00226305 8/3/2005 VERIZON 42.85 AP - 00226306 8/3/2005 VIDEO GUYS, THE 151.94 AP - 00226306 8/3/2005 VIDEO GUYS, THE 716.59 AP - 00226306 8/3/2005 VIDEO GUYS, THE 351.94 AP - 00226306 8/3/2005 VIDEO GUYS, THE 53.88 AP - 00226307 8/3/2005 VIGILANCE, TERRENCE 455.00 AP - 00226307 8/3/2005 VIGILANCE, TERRENCE 676.00 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 27 Current Date: 08/10/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:~ ~08:54:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 7/27/2005 through 8/9/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00226307 8/3/2005 VIGILANCE, TERRENCE 520.00 AP - 00226308 8/3/2005 VISION SERVICE PLAN CA 7,464.96 AP - 00226309 8/3/2005 WE TIP INC 7,740.00 AP - 00226310 8/3/2005 WHEELER PAVING INC 378.19 AP - 00226312 8/3/2005 WOODS, TOYA 180.00 AP - 00226313 8/3/2005 WYPISZYNSKI EVERTS, TRACI 12.50 AP - 00226313 8/3/2005 WYPISZYNSKI EVERTS, TRACI 1.25 AP - 00226314 8/3/2005 XEROX CORPORATION 1,794.04 AP - 00226314 8/3/2005 XEROX CORPORATION 150.53 AP - 00226314 8/3/2005 XEROX CORPORATION 150.53 Total for Check ID AP: 4,396,667.67 Total for Entity: 4,396,667.67 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 28 Current Date: 08/10/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:...,~ 08:54:2 City of Rancho Cucamonga City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary June 30, 2005 Par Market Book % of Days to YTM YTM Investments Value Value Value Portfolio Term Maturity 360 Equiv. 365 Equiv. Local Agency Investment Fund 28,582,795.54 28,582,795.54 28,582.,795,54 16,21 I 1 2.926 2,967 Certificates of Deposit/Neg. - Bank 1,515,000.00 1,511,544.44 1,515,000.00 0.86 733 59 2.150 2.180 Federal Agency Issues - Coupon 125,750,000.00 123,695,132.71 125,688,175 CO 71.26 1,488 886 3.139 3.182 Treasury Securities - Coupon 5,000,000.00 4,953,12500 4,985,546,88 2~83 1,070 683 3.184 3.229 Investment Agreements 15,600,(X30.00 15,600,000 CO 15,600,000.00 8~84 1 1 3.682 3.733 Investments 176,447,795.54 174,342,597.69 176,371,517.42 100.00% 1,097 652 3.145 3.189 Cash and Accrued Interest Passbook/Checking 1,097,380.72 1,097,380.72 1,097,38072 I I 0493 0.500 (not included in yield calculations) Accrued Interest at Purchase 113 33 113,33 Subtotal 1,097,49405 1,097,494.05 Total Cash and Investments 177,545,176.26 175,440,091.74 177,469,011.47 1,097 652 3.145 3.189 Total Earnings June 30 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date Fiscal Year Ending Current Year 471,054.03 5,293,638.88 5,293,638.88 Average Daily Balance 180,499,588.42 170,867,462.47 Effective Rate of Return 3.18% 3.10% I certify that this report accurately reflects all City pooled investments and is in comformity with the investment policy adopted October 6, 2004. A copy of the investment policy is availabie in the Administrative Services Department. The Investment Program herein shown provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet the next six months estimated expenditures. The month-end market values were obtained from (IDC)-Interactive Data Corporation pricing service. The attached Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents as of the prior month's end is provided under the City official Investment Policy. The provisions of the individual bond documents govern the management of these funds..On October 21, 2004 the City entered into a Investment Agreement with Aegon/'l'mnsamerica in the amount of $15,600,000. The Investment Agreement will earn interest at 6.00% per annuro through June 28, 2006 to provide funding for specific expenditures during that period. Beginning June 29, 2006 through October 21,2009, the Investment Agreement will eamn interest a~2At~'~e average annual rate of retum over the five year period is 3.682% which is incorporated in the annual rate of return noted above. J~ro~t~urer Portfolio CITY CP u~..~un Date; 08~4/2005 - t 7:35 PM (PRF_PM1) SymRept V6.21 Report Var. 5.00 City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Page 2 Portfolio Details - Investments June 30, 2005 A~rage Purchase Stated Y'rM Days to Maturity CUSIP Investment # Iss~r Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 360 Maturity Date Local Agency Investment Fund SYSOO008 00005 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND 28,582,795.54 28,582,795.54 28,582,795.54 2.967 2.926 1 Subtotal and Average 32,189,462.21 28,582,795.54 28,582,795.54 28,582,795.54 2,926 1 Certificates of Deposit/Neg. - Bank 0605OE6Q3 1228 BANK OF AMERICA 08/27/2003 1,515,000,00 1,511,544.44 1,515,000.00 2.150 2,150 59 08/29/2005 Subtotal and Average 1,515,00(I.00 1,515,000.00 1,511,544.44 1,515,000.00 2.150 59 Federal Agency Issues - Coupon 31331QK55 1199 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 05/19/2003 2,500,0CO.00 2,446,093.75 2,496,875.00 3.120 3.104 1,053 05/19/2008 31331QM79 1205 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 0~02/2003 2,000,0(~O.00 1,961,250.00 2,000,000.00 3.210 3.166 1,068 06/03/2008 31331QN78 1207 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 06/09/2003 5,500,000.00 5,376,25000 5,500,000.00 2.440 2.407 616 03/09/2007 31331Q7C5 1226 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 08/15/2003 3,000,000.00 2,951,250.00 2,995,312.50 3.050 3~049 773 08/13/2007 31331TFG1 1231 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 09/24/2003 2,000,000.00 1,978,750.CO 1,996,562.50 3375 3374 815 09/24/2007 31331TND9 124zt FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 12/17/2003 2,000,000.00 1,973,750.00 2,0OO,CO0 00 3.970 3916 1,082 05/17/2008 31331TWHO 1253 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 03/17/2004 2,000,000.00 1,939,375.o0 2,000,000.00 3240 3.196 990 03/17/2008 31331TWJ6 1254 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 02/17/2004 4,000,000.00 3,888,750.00 3,997,50000 3.550 3.517 1,235 11/17/2008 31331TG62 1263 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 04/29/2004 3,500,000.00 3,482,500.00 3,479,000.00 3920 4.012 1,214 10/27/2008 31331TU25 1272 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 06/10/2004 3,000,000.00 2,996,250.00 3,000,000.00 4000 3945 892 12/10/2007 31339XJJ4 1210 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/12/2003 5,000,000.00 4,889,062.50 5,000,000 00 2.650 2.614 710 06/11/2~o7 31339XB78 1211 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/15/2003 3,000,000.00 2,931,,56R50 3,000,000.00 2.430 2.397 623 03/15/2007 31339XLB8 1212 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/19/2003 2,~(X),000.00 1,953,750.00 2,000,000.00 2.625 2.589 718 06/19/2~O7 31339XPL2 1213 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/25/2003 2,000,000.00 1,940,625.00 2,000,000.00 2.450 2.417 817 09/26/2(X)7 31339YHG0 1218 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 07/15/2003 3,000,0~O.00 2,933,437.50 3,000,000.00 2.540 2,506 654 04/15/2007 3133X1P27 1237 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 16/27/2003 3,000,000.00 2,989,687.50 3,000,000.00 4.000 3.945 1,214 10/27/2008 3133X3DX8 1247 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 01/29/2004 2,000,000.00 1,978,125.(X) 2,000,C00.00 3.355 3.310 850 10/29/2007 3133X4MR9 1255 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 03/26/2004 5,000,000.00 4,923,437.50 5,000,000.00 2.750 2.713 543 12/25/2006 3133X4XF3 1256 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 03/29/2004 2,000,000.00 1,954,375.00 2,000,000.00 3.500 3.452 910 12/28/2007 3133X5WA2 1264 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 04/30/2004 2,000,000.00 1,967,500.00 2,000,000.00 3,210 3.167 943 01/30/2008 3133XAR25 1277 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 02/16/2005 1,000,O00.00 999,062.50 1,000,000.00 4.080 4.024 1,144 06/15/2008 3133XAMW4 1279 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 02/22/2005 1,0~O,000.00 997,187.50 999,750.C~ 4.000 3.954 966 02~22/2008 3128X1BD8 1198 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 05/19/2003 5,000,000.00 4,940,995.03 4,993,750.00 3.500 3.479 1,053 05/19/2008 3128X1FG7 1203 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 05/28/2003 3,000,000.00 2,946,513.06 3,(X)O,000.CO 2.500 2.466 515 11/23/2CO6 3128X1DK0 1204 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 05/28/2003 4,000,000.00 3,897,368.16 4,000,000.00 3.100 3.058 880 11/23/2007 3128X1JDO 1208 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 06/12/2003 5,~00,000.00 4,878,489~68 4,998,500.00 3,030 2.995 1,076 06/11/2008 3128XIJN8 1209 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. ~12-~2(X)3 2,000,000.00 1,947,969 97 2,000,000 00 2.400 2.367 710 06/11/2007 3128X1L96 1233 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 16/08/2C~3 4,000,0~O.00 3,953,308.10 3,997,60000 2.800 2.782 443 09/17/2006 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date; 0~,~4/2005 - 17:35 PM (PRF_PM2) Sy~Rept V6.21 Report Ver. 5.00 City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management page ~ Portfolio Details - Investments June 30, 2005 Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to Maturity CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 360 Maturity Data Federal Agency Issues - Coupon 3128x2P25 1257 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 03/30/2004 3,000,000.00 2,986,77017 3,000,000.00 4.000 3.945 1,368 03/30/2009 3128X07G8 1258 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 04/12_/2004 1,250,000.00 1,239,868.74 1,248,750.00 3.650 3.626 1,041 05/07/2008 3128X25Y7 1260 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP~ 04/10/2004 2,000,000.00 1,960,018.01 1,997,600~00 2~920 2.916 840 10/19/2007 3128X3BF9 1261 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP 04/26/2004 1,000,000 00 967,530.06 1,000,000~00 3~280 3.235 847 10/25/2007 3128X3CS0 1262 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 04/29/2004 5,000,000.00 4,954,844.67 5,000,000.00 3.450 3.403 850 10/29/2007 3128X3FC2 1267 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP 05/24/2004 3,000,000.00 2,988,800.81 2,999,062.50 3.750 3708 875 11/23/2007 3136F3VQ6 1202 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 03/27/2003 7,000,000.00 6,829,375.00 6,996,500.00 2.500 2.479 693 05/25/2007 3136F3Q82 1219 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 07/15/2003 4,000,000.00 3,897,500.00 4,000,000 00 2500 2.466 745 07/10/2007 3136F32F2 1222 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 07/29/2003 4,000,000.00 3,930,00000 3,993,750.00 3.300 3.289 1,124 07/29/2008 3136F4B45 1243 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 12/12/2003 2,000,000.00 1,970,000.00 2,000,000.00 3.300 3.255 529 12/12/2006 3136FSEE7 1250 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 00/05/2004 3,000,000.00 2,972,812.50 2,999,062.50 3.750 3.707 1,256 12/08/2008 3136F6GP0 1252 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 03/16/2004 4,000,0CO.00 3,983,750.00 4,000,000.00 4.040 3.985 1,354 03/16/2009 3136FSPB1 1259 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 04/12/2004 1,000,000.00 982,187.50 1,000,000.00 3.020 2.979 833 10/12/2007 3136F6YC6 1278 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 02/22/2005 2,000,000.00 1,995,0C~.00 1,998,600.00 4.000 3.970 966 02/22/2008 Subtotal end Average 125,688,175.00 125,750,000.00 123,695,t32.71 125,688,175.00 3.139 886 Treasury Securities - Coupon 912828CG3 1271 TREASURY NOTE 06/09/2004 5,000,000.00 4,953,125.00 4,985,546.88 3.125 3.184 683 06/15/2007 Subtotal and Average 4,985,546.88 5,000,000.00 4,953,125.00 4,985,546.88 3.184 683 Investment Agreements SYS1275 1275 AEGON / TRANSAMERICA 10/21/2004 15,600,000.00 16,600,000.00 15,600,000.00 3.682 &682 1 Subtotal and Average 15,600,000.00 15,600,000.00 15,600,000.00 15,600,000.00 3.682 1 Total and A~rage 180,499,588.42 176,447,795.54 174,342,597.69 176,371,517.42 3.145 652 Portfolio CITY CP D~te: 08¢04/2005 - 17:35 PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept V6.21 City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Page Portfolio Details - Cash June 30, 2005 A~rage Purchase Stated Y'rM Days to CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 360 Maturity Savings/Miscellaneous Accounts SYSO0180 00180 BANK OF AMERICA 1,097,380.72 1,097,380.72 1,097,380.72 0.500 0.493 1 A~rage Balance 0.00 Accrued Interest at Purchase 113.33 113.33 1 Subtotal 1,097,494.05 1,097,494.05 Total Cash and Inv~stmentes 180,499,588.42 177,545,176.26 175,440~091.74 177,469,011.47 3.145 652 Portfolio CITY CP City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Page ~,,5 Activity By Type June 1,2005 through June 30, 2005 Beginning Stated Transaction Purchases Redemptions Ending CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Rate Date or Deposits or Withdrawals Balance Local Agency Investment Fund (Monthly Summary) SYS00005 00005 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND 2.967 9,500,000.00 10,500,000 00 Subtotal 29,582,795.54 9,500,000.00 10,500,000.00 28,582,795.54 Savings/MIscellaneeus Accounts (Monthly Summary) SYS00180 00180 BANK OF AMERICA 0.500 595,837.64 0.00 Subtotal 501,543.08 595,837.64 0.00 1,097,380.72 Certificates of Deposit/Neg.. Bank Subtotal 1,515,000.00 1,515,000.00 Federal Agency Issues - Coupon Subtotal 125,688,175.00 125,688,175.00 Treasury Securities - Coupon Subtotal 4,985,546.88 4,985,546.88 Investment Agreements Subtotal 15,600,000.00 15,600,000.00 Total 177,873,060.50 10,095,837.64 10,500,000.00 177,468,898.14 ' Portfolio CITY CP 17:35 PM (PRF_PM3) SymRept V6.2! City of Rancho Cucamonga Summery of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents For the Month Ended May 31, 2005 Trustee and/or Purchase Maturity Cost Bond Issue Pavino Aoent Account Name Investment Date Date Yield Value Assessment District No 93-1 US Bank Imprvmnt Fund First American Treasury Obligation 8/4/1997 N/A* 0.00% $ 258,551.41 Masi Plaza Imprvmnt Fund Cash N/A N/A N/A Reserve Fund First American Treasury Obligation 8/4/1997 N/A* 0.00% 243,678.32 Reserve Fund N/A N/A N/A Redemp. Fund First American Treasury Obligation 8/4/1997 N/A 0.00% 2.75 Redemp. Fund Cash N/A N/A N/A $ 502,232.48 PFA RFDG Rev Bonds series US Bank Expense Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A* 0.00% $ Cash N/A N/A N/A 1999 A (Sr) & 1999 B (Subord) Sub Resrv. Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A* 1.41% 586,427.22 Cash N/A N/A N/A Sr. Resrv. Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A* 1.41% 1,101,674.59 Cash N/A N/A N/A Redemption Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 NIA* 0.00% Cash N/A N/A N/A Revenue Fund First American Treasury Obligation 3/2/2000 N/A* 0.00% 4.00 Cash N/A N/A N/A Residual Fund First American Treasury Obrigation 1/16/2001 N/A* 1.41% 105,534.41 Cash N/A N/A N/A $ 1,793,640.22 TOTAL CASH AND INVESTMENTS WITH FISCAL AGENTS $ 2,295,872.70 * Note: These inves~nents are money market accounts which have no stated maturity date as they may be liquidated upon demand. ~ k~nancelCash with Fiscal Agents.xls 7/12J2005 3:33 PM City of Rancho Cucamonga City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary July 31, 2005 Par Marker Book % of Days to YTM Y'rM Investments Value Value Value Porttollo Term Maturity 360 Equiv. 365 Equiv. Local Agency Investment Fund 23,277,569.05 23,277,569,05 23,277,569.05 13.61 1 I 3.041 3.083 Certificates of Deposit/Neg. - Bank 1,515,000.00 1,513,107.46 1,515,000~00 0.89 733 28 2.150 2,180 F6deral Agency Issues - Coupon 125,750,00000 122,798,136~06 125,688,175.00 73.47 1,488 855 3.139 3,182 Treasury Securities - Coupon 5,000,000.00 4,925,000,00 4,985,546,98 2.91 1,070 652 3.184 3.229 Investment Agreements 15,600,000.00 15,600,000,00 15,600,000.00 9.12 1 I 3682 3~733 Investments 171,142,569.05 168,113,812.57 171,066,290.93 100.00% 1,131 648 3.167 3.211 Cash and Accrued Interest Passbook/Checking 21,985 39 21,985.39 21,98539 1 1 0.493 0.500 (not included in yield calculations) Accrued Interest at Purchase 11333 113.33 Subtota~ 22,098.72 22,098.72 Total Cash and Investments 171,164,554.44 168,135,911.29 171,088,389.65 1,131 648 3.167 3.211 Total Earnings July 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date Current Year 467,093.76 467,093.76 Average Daily Balance 176,218,438.60 176,218,438.60 Effective Rate of Return 3.12% 3.12% I certify that this report accurately reflects air City pooled investments and is in comformity with the investment policy adopted October 6, 2004. A copy of the investment policy is available in the Administrative Services Department. The Investment Program herein shown provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet the next six months estimated expenditures. The month-end market values were obtained from (IDC)-Interactive Data Corporation pricing service. The attached Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents as of the prior month's end is provided under the City official Investment Policy. The provisions of the individual bend dccurnents govern the management of these funds. On October 21,2004 the City entered into a investment Agreement with Aegon/Transamerica in the amount of $15,600,000. The Investment Agreement will earn interest at 6.00% par~.,.~um through June 28, 2006 to provide funding for specific expenditures during that poried. Beginning June 29, 2006 through October 21, 2009, the Investment Agreement will--annual rate of return over the f ve year per od s 3 682% which is incorporated in the annual rate of return noted abeve. O~ro~/t~rer Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF_PM1) SymRept V6.21 City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Page Portfolio Details - Investments July 31, 2005 Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to Maturity CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 360 Maturity Date Local Agency Investment Fund SYS00005 00005 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND 23,277,569.05 23,277,569.05 23,277,569.05 3.083 3.041 1 Subtotal and Average 27,367,026.17 23,277,569.05 23,277,569.05 23,277,569.05 3.041 1 Certificates of Deposit/Neg. - Bank 0605OE6Q3 1228 BANK OF AMERICA 08/27/2003 1,515,000.00 1,513,107.46 1,515,000.00 2.150 2.150 28 08/29/2005 Subtetal and Average 1,515,0(X).00 1,515,000.00 1,513,107.46 1,515,000.00 2.150 28 Federal Agency Issues - Coupon 31331QK55 1199 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 05/19/2003 2,500,000.00 2,422,656.25 2,496,875.00 3.120 3104 1,022 05/19/2008 31331QM79 1205 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 06/03/2003 2,000,00000 1,941,250.00 2,000,000.00 3210 3166 1,037 06/03/2009 31331QN78 1207 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 06/09/2003 5,500,000.00 5,352,187.50 5,500,000.00 2.440 2.407 585 03/09/2007 31331Q7C5 1226 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 06/15/2003 3,000,000.00 2,932,500.00 2,995,312.50 3.050 3.049 742 08/13/2007 31331TFG1 1231 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 09/24/2003 2,C(X),000.00 1,965,000.00 1,996,562.50 3375 3.374 784 09/24/2007 31331TND9 1244 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 12/17/2003 2,000,000.00 1,954,375.00 2,000,000.00 3.970 3916 1,051 06/17/2008 31331TWH0 1253 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 05/17/2004 2,000,000.00 1,921,875.00 2,000,000.00 3.240 3.196 959 03/17/2008 31331TWJ6 1254 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 03/17/2004 4,000,000.00 3,842,500.00 3,997,500.00 3.550 3.517 1,204 11/17/2008 31331TG62 1263 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 04/29/2004 3,500,0CO.00 3,449,687.50 3,479,000.00 3.920 4.012 1,183 10/27/2008 31331TU25 1272 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 06/10/2004 3,000,000.00 2,979,37500 3,000,000.00 4.000 3.945 861 12/10/2007 31339XJJ4 1210 FEDERAL HOME LOAN RANK 06/12/2003 5,000,000.00 4,860,937.50 5,000,000.00 2.650 2.614 679 06/11/2007 31339XB78 1211 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/16/2003 3,000,000.00 2,917,500.00 3,000,000.00 2.430 2397 592 03/16/2007 31339XLB8 1212 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/19/2003 2,000,000.00 1,942,500.00 2,000,000.00 2.625 2589 687 06/19/2007 31339XPL2 1213 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/26/2003 2,{:X30,000.00 1,926,875 00 2,000,000.00 2.450 2.417 786 09/26/2007 31339YHGO 1218 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 07/16/2003 3,000,000.00 2,917,50000 3,000,0C~.00 2.540 2.506 623 04/15/2007 3133X1P27 1237 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 10/27/2003 3,000,000.00 2,961,562..50 3,000,000.00 4~000 3.945 1,183 10/27/2008 3133X3DX8 1247 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 01/29/2004 2,000,000.00 1,961,875.00 2,000,000.00 3.355 3.310 819 10/29/2007 3133X4MR9 1255 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 03/26/2004 5,000,000.00 4,903,125.00 5,000,000.00 2.750 2.713 512 12/26/2006 3133X4XF3 1256 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 03/2912004 2,000,000.00 1,961,875.00 2,000,000.00 3.500 3.452 879 12/28/2007 3133XSWA2 1264 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 04/30/2004 2,000,000.00 1,949,375.00 2,000,000.00 3.210 3.167 912 01/30/2008 3133XAR25 1277 FEDERAL HOME LOAN SANK 02/1612005 1,000,000.C~ 990,312.50 1,000,000.00 4.080 4024 1,113 08/18/2008 3133XAMW4 1279 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 02/22/2005 1,000,000.00 989,062.50 999,750.00 4.000 3.954 935 02/22/2008 3128X1SD8 1198 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 05/19/2003 5,000,000.00 4,894,315.34 4,993,750.00 3.500 3.479 1,022 05/19/2008 3128Xl FG7 1203 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 05~26/2003 3,000,000.00 2,936,031 Ag 3,000,000.00 2.500 2.466 484 11/28/2006 3128XIDK0 1204 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 05/26/2003 4,000,000.00 3,866,696.17 4,000,000.00 3.100 3.058 849 11/20/2007 3128X1JD0 120~ FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 06/12/2003 5,000,000.00 4,829,885.10 4,998,5CO.00 3.030 2.995 1,O45 06/11/2CO8 3128X1JN8 1209 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 06/12/2003 2,000,000.00 1,936,419.98 2,000,000.00 2.400 2.367 B79 06/11/2007 3128X1L96. 1233 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 10/08~2003 4,000,000.00 3,941,011.96 3,997,600.00 2.800 2.782 412 09117/2006 Portfolio CITY CP ~ ~ PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept V6.21 City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Page 3 Portfolio Details - Investments July 31, 2005 Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to Maturity CUSIP In~stment a Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 360 Maturity D=*~ Federal Agency Issues - Coupon 3128x2P25 1257 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 03/30/2004 3,000,0~O.CO 2,955,785.98 3,000,000.00 4.000 3.945 1,337 03/30/2009 3128X07G8 1258 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 04/12/2004 1,250,000.00 1,228,580.09 1,248,750.00 3.650 3.626 1,010 05/07/2008 3128X25Y7 1260 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 04/19/2004 2,000,000.00 1,945,136.11 1,997,600.00 2~920 2.916 809 15/19/2007 3128X3BF9 1261 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 04/26/2004 1,000,000.00 979,837.95 1,000,000.00 3.280 3.235 816 10/26/2007 3128X3CS0 1262 FEDERAL HOM~: LOAN MORTG. CORP~ 04/29/2004 5,000,000.00 4,916,494.75 5,000,000.00 3.450 3.403 819 10/29/2007 3128X3FC2 1267 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 05/24/2004 3,000,000.00 2,966,535.19 2,g99,062.50 3~750 3.708 844 11/23/2007 3136F3VQ6 1202 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 05/27/2003 7,C(X),000.00 6,792,187.50 6,996,500.00 2.500 2.479 662 06/26/2007 3136F3Q82 1219 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 07/16/2003 4,000,000.00 3,873,750.00 4,000,000.00 2.500 2.466 714 07/16/2007 3136F32F2 1222 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 07/29/2003 4,000,000.00 3,887,500.00 3,993,750.00 3.300 3.289 1,093 07/29/2008 3136F4B45 1243 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 12/12/2003 2,000,000.00 1,962,5CO.00 2,000,000.00 3.300 3.255 498 12/12/2006 3136F5EE7 1250 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 03/06/2004 3,000,000.00 2,940,937.50 2,999,062.50 3.750 3.707 1,225 12/08/2008 3136F5GP0 1252 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 03/16/2004 4,000,000.00 3,946,250.00 4,000,000.00 4.040 3.985 1,323 03/16/2009 3136FSPB1 1259 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 04/12/2004 1,000,000.00 975,000.00 1,000,000.00 3.020 2.979 802 10/12/2007 3136F6YQ6 1278 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 02/22/2005 2,0(~0,000 00 1,979,375.00 1,998,600.00 4~000 3.970 935 02/22/2008 Subtotal and Average 125,688,175.00 125,750,000.C~ 122,798,136.06 125,688,175.00 3.139 855 Treasury Securities - Coupon 912828CG3 1271 TREASURY NOTE 06/09/2004 5,000,000.00 4,925,000.00 4,985,546.88 3.125 3.184 652 06/16/2007 Subtotal and Average 4,985,546.88 5,000,000.00 4,925,0~0.00 4,9~5,546.88 3.184 652 Investment Agreements SYS1275 1275 AEGON / TRANSAMERICA 16/21/2004 15,600,000.00 15,600,000.00 15,600,000.00 3.682 3.682 1 Subtotal and Average 15,600,000.00 15,600,000.00 15,600,(~0.00 15,600,000.00 3.682 1 Total and Average 176~18,438.60 171,142,569.05 168,113,812.57 171,066,290.93 3.167 648 Portfolio CITY PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept V6.21 City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Page Portfolio Details - Cash July 3~1, 2005 Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 360 Maturity Savings/Miscellaneous Accounts SYSO0180 00180 BANK OF AMERICA 21,985.39 21,985.39 21,985.39 0.500 0.493 1 Average Balance 0.00 Accrued Interest at Purchase 113.33 113.33 1 Subtotal 22,098.72 22.098.72 Total Cash and Inv~stmenta$ 176,218,438.60 171,164,554.44 168,135,911.29 171,088,389.65 3.167 648 Portfolio CITY cP PM (PRF_PM2) Sy~Reflt v6.21 City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Page Activity By Type July 1,2005 through July 31, 2005 Beginning Stated Transaction Purchases Redemptions Ending CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Rate Date or Deposits or W~thdrawals Balance Local Agency Investment Fund (Monthly Summary) SYS00005 00005 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND 3.083 1,194,773.51 6,500,000.00 Subtotal 28,582,795.54 1,194,773.51 6~500,000.00 23,277,569.05 Savings/Miscellaneous Accounts (Monthly Summary) SYS00180 00180 BANK OF AMERICA 0500 0.00 1,075,305.33 Subtotal 1,097,380.72 0.00 1,075,395.33 21,9~5.39 Certificates of Deposit/Neg. - Bank Subtotal 1,515,000.00 1,515,000.00 Federal Agency Issues - Coupon Subtotal 125,688,175.00 125,688,175.00 Treasury Securities. Coupon Subtotal 4,985,546.88 4,985,546.88 Investment Agreements Subtotsl 15,600,000.00 15,600,0(30.00 Total 177,468,898.14 1,194,773.51 7,575,395.33 171,088,276.32 Po~olio CITY cP PM (PRF_PM3) SymRept V6.21 City of Rancho Cucamonga Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents For the Month Ended June 30, 2005 Trustee and/or Purchase Maturity Cost Bond Issue Paving Agent Account Name Investment Date Date Yield Value Assessment District No 93-1 US Bank Imprvmnt Fund Fimt American Treasury Obligation 8/4/1997 N/A* 0,00% $ 259,048.65 Masi Plaza Imprvmnt Fund Cash N/A N/A N/A Reserve Fund First American Treasury Obligation 8/4/1997 N/A* 0.00% 244,146.96 Reserve Fund N/A N/A N/A Redemp. Fund First American Treasury Obligation 8/4/1997 N/A 0.00% 2.76 Redemp. Fund Cash N/A N/A N/A $ 503,198.37 PFA RFDG Rev Bonds series US Bank Expense Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A* 0.00% $ Cash N/A N/A N/A 1999 A (Sr) & 1999 B (Subord) Sub Resrv. Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A* 1.41% 587,555.02 Cash N/A N/A N/A Sr. Resrv. Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A* 1.41% 1,103,793.30 Cash N/A N/A N/A Redemption Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A* 0.00% Cash N/A N/A N/A Revenue Fund First American Treasury Obligation 3/2/2000 N/A* 0.00% Cash N/A N/A N/A Residuar Fund First American Treasury Obligation 1/16/2001 N/A' 1.41% 105,737.37 Cash N/A N/A N/A $ 1,797,085.69 TOTAL CASH AND INVESTMENTS WITH FISCAL AGENTS $ 2,300,284.06 · Note: These investments are money market accounts which have no stated maturity date as they may be liquidated upon demand. ~.. i:b3nance~Cash with Fiscal Agents.xls 8/~/2005 11:15 AM R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT StaffR ort DATE: August 17, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Cindy Hackett, Associate Engineer~'k~¢ SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM BASE LINE ROAD TO 19TM STREET TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NO. 11763035650/1371176-0 (MEASURE "1" FUNDS) RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve plans and specifications for the construction of Archibald Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation from Base Line Road to 19m Street and approve the Attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids". BACKGROUND / ANALYSIS Archibald Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation scope of work to be performed in general consists of, but not limited to, cold planing, crack sealing, asphalt rubber overlay, installation of PCC curb & gutter and catch basin, loop replacement, striping, pavement markings and signing, etc. The project is to be funded from Measure "1" funds, Account No. 11763035650/1371176-0. Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt per Article 19, Section 15301(c) of the CEQA guidelines. The Engineer's estimate for the Archibald Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation is $297,000. Legal advertising is scheduled for August 23, and September 6, 2005 with bid opening at 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, September 13, 2005. Respe.ctfully submitted, Will~m J. O Nell City Engineer 6// VICINITY MAP ~OJECT SITE CHURCH ! 8th SmEET ~i N.T.S. 0~/'~'0 ~ (~ ram fa. ~o IOTa sm.) PAVEMENT RRgAlaUTA?ION AND WIDENIIqG ~q.?.s. RESOLUTION NO. ~'"' ~ ~/~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "ARCHIBALD AVENUE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM BASE LINE ROAD TO 19TM STREET" IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for the "ARCHIBALD AVENUE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM BASE LINE ROAD TO 19TM STREET". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized an~l directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, September 13, 2005, sealed bids or proposals for the "ARCHIBALD AVENUE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM BASE LINE ROAD TO 19TM STREET". Bids wilt be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "ARCHIBALD AVENUE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM BASE LINE ROAD TO 19TM STREET". PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that RESOLUTION NO. August 17, 2005 Page 2 regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein before stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public work's project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or RESOLUTION NO. August 17, 2005 Page 3 journeymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work herein before mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least 10% of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashiers' check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the Iow bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be 100% of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to 100% of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the RESOLUTION NO. August 17, 2005 Page 4 work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. On the date and at the time of the submittal of the Bidder's Proposal the Prime Contractor shall possess any and all contractor licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; Including but not limited to a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) or a combination of Specialty Class "C" Licenses sufficient to cover all the work to be performed by the Prime Contractor in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code," Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, Engineering Counter, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and payment of $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS), said $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS) is non refundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional non- reimbursable payment of $15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS)to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga reserves the right to reject any or all bids. RESOLUTION NO. August 17, 2005 Page 5 Questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids for the "ARCHIBALD AVENUE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM BASE LINE ROAD TO 19TM STREET" may be directed to: Cindy Hackett, Associate Engineer at (909) 477-2740, ext. 4066. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this 17th day of August, 2005 Publish Dates: August 23, 2005 and September 6, 2005 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this 17th day of August, 2005. William J. Alexander, Mayor ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 17th day of August, 2005. Executed this 17th day of August, 2005, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk ADVERTISE ON: August 23, 2005 and September 6, 2005 R A N H O C U C A M O N G A 1~ N G I i',' t~ E D I N G D I~ p ^ 1~ ~ bi ~' N ~f Staff Report DATE: August 17, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Maria E. Perez, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR THE BASE LINE ROAD PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM HERMOSA AVENUE TO VALENCIA AVENUE TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NO. 11763035650/1469176-0 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council approve the plans and specifications for the Base Line Road Pavement Rehabilitation from Hermosa Avenue to Valencia Avenue, and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids." BACKGROUND/ANALYSI~ This project will improve pavement on Base Line Road from Hermosa Avenue to Valencia Avenue. The rehabilitation will, in conjunction with recently completed projects and projects under construction, provide for the resurfacing of Base Line Road, from Milliken Avenue to Ramona Avenue. The project will be funded from Measure I Funds (Account No. 11763035650/1469176_0. Staff has determined that the project is Categorically Exempt per Article 19, Section 15301 (c) of the CEQA guidelines. The project plans and specifications have been completed and approved by the City Engineer. The Engineer's estimate is $315,000, including a 10% contingency, plus an additional $15,000 required for Construction Administration, which includes advertising, CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Base Line Road Pavement Rehabilitation from Hermosa Avenue to Valencia Avenue August 17, 2005 Page 2 printing, materials testing and survey. Legal advertising is scheduled for August 23,2005 and August 30, 2005, with a bid opening at 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, September 13, 2005. Respectfully submitted, Willia/m J. 0 Neil City Engineer WJO:MEP Attachments: Vicinity Map and Resolution ~] ~VlLSOi~ AVEI ONSF RR BTH ST 6TH ST 4TH ST ONTARIO CITY LIMIT PROJECT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~ VICINITY MAP - BASELINE ROAD REHABILITATION FROM HERMOSA AVE TO · VALENCIA AVE ms RESOLUTION NO. ~) ~'"' 2'~ ~' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "BASE LINE ROAD PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM HERMOSA AVENUE TO VALENCIA AVENUE" IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for the "BASE LINE ROAD PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM HERMOSA AVENUE TO VALENCIA AVENUE". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, September 13, 2005, sealed bids or proposals for the "BASE LINE ROAD PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM HERMOSA AVENUE TO VALENCIA AVENUE". Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office.of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "BASE LINE ROAD PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM HERMOSA AVENUE TO VALENCIA AVENUE". PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that RESOLUTION NO. August 17, 2005 Page 2 regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein before stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public work's project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or · B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or RESOLUTION NO. August 17, 2005 Page 3 journeymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work herein before mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least 10% of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashiers' check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the Iow bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be 100% of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to 100% of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the RESOLUTION NO. August 17, 2005 Page 4 work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation 'insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. On the date and at the time of the submittal of the Bidder's Proposal the Prime Contractor shall possess any and all contractor licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; Including but not limited to a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) or a combination of Specialty Class "C" Licenses sufficient to cover all the work to be performed by the Prime Contractor in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code," Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, Engineering Counter, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and payment of $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS), said $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS) is non refundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional non- reimbursable payment of $15.00 FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set fodh in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga reserves the right to reject any or all bids. RESOLUTION NO. August 17, 2005 Page 5 Questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids for the "BASE LINE ROAD PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM HERMOSA AVENUE TO VALENCIA AVENUE" may be directed to: Maria Perez, Associate Engineer at (909) 477-2740, ext. 4036. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this 17th day of August, 2005 Publish Dates: August 23, 2005 and August 30, 2005 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this 17th day of August, 2005. William J. Alexander, Mayor ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 17th day of August, 2005. Executed this 17th day of August, 2005, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk ADVERTISE ON: August 23, 2005 and August 30, 2005 R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING D E PA R Ti~l E N T Staff Report DATE: August 17, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Walter C, Stickney, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES AND TO AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR THE BERYL PARK SPORTS FIELD SCREEN CONSTRUCTION, TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NUMBER 11203055650/133512.0 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council approve the plans and specifications for the Beryl Park Sports Field Screen Construction, and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids." BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS As part of the 210 Freeway construction, a 16-foot high sound wall was constructed along the southern edge of Beryl Park. Soccer is played at Beryl Park. Since the 210 Freeway's opening, the American Youth Soccer Organization (AYSO) has reported that an average of 1 or 2 soccer balls per week have been kicked over the 16-foot high sound wall. To date, there have been no reports that these soccer balls have entered the freeway ti'avel lanes. To significantly reduce the number of soccer balls entering the freeway right-of-way, the City plans to install a 36-foot high screen. The City and the San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) have previously entered into a funding agreement to share the cost of this screen. Mr. Max Hernandez, the AYSO Regional Commissioner, stated during discussions with the Community Services Department the screen should be between 34 feet and 36 feet high. To maximize coverage, the City decided to use the taller height. The bottom of the screen will be 14 feet above the ground. This height will provide a 2-foot "overlap" between the bottom of the screen CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT RE:Beryl Park Spods Field Screen August17,2005 Page 2 and the top of the 16-foot tall sound wall. The 14-foot screen clearance will make it difficult for anyone to grab the netting. The matedal for the screen is similar to the fabric netting used at golf courses and baseball fields. The screen will be hung from wooden poles, which will be installed at 50-foot intervals. Severe restrictions exist within the project area. They include a 20-foot wide CVWD easement with a sewer line, a storm drain, a windrow of mature pine trees and lighting towers for the soccer fields· Numerous design iterations were done to "best fit" the screen. Unfortunately, the alignment of the screen will require the removal of 10 out of 24 pine trees adjacent to the sound wall· Some of the remaining pine trees will have to be trimmed so that their branches do not damage the netting. Special attention has been taken to avoid conflicts with soccer season. Construction equipment cannot be closer than 15 feet from the soccer fields. Also, the contractor will be required to end work and be off the project site by 3:30 pm on weekdays. This will avoid soccer practices, which usually start at 4:00 pm. Finally, no construction activity will be allowed on weekends. A chain link fence will enclose the staging area. Construction is expected to commence in either late September or early October of this year and last for approximately 5 weeks· Respectfully submitted, : · O'Neil City Engineer WJO:WCS Attachments: Vicinity Map and Resolution Beryl Park Sports Field Screen RESOLUTION NO. ~5' ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE BERYL PARK SPORTS FIELD SCREEN CONSTRUCTION, IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for "BERYL PARK SPORTS FIELD SCREEN". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALR" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 p.m. on Thursday September 8, 2005, sealed bids or proposals for the "BERYL PARK SPORTS FIELD SCREEN" capital improvement project in said city. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of the "BERYL PARK SPORTS FIELD SCREEN". PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance With the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rat~ of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, ,5? RESOLUTION NO. August 17, 2005 Page 2 Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein before stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public work's project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with RESOLUTION NO. August 17, 2005 Page 3 and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each'laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work herein before mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least 10% of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashiers' check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the Iow bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be 100% of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to 100% of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and tl~e Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into I~etween him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. On the date and at the time of the submittal of the Bidder's Proposal the Prime Contractor shall possess any and all contractor licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; Including but not limited to a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) or a combination of Specialty Class "C" licenses sufficient to cover all the work to be performed by the Prime Contractor in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code," Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and RESOLUTION NO. August 17, 2005 Page 4 be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and payment of $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS), said $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS) is non refundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional non reimbursable payment of $25.00 (TWENTY-FIVE DOLLARS) to cove~ the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga reserves the right to reject any or all bids. Questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids for the "BERYL PARK SPORTS FIELD SCREEN" may be directed to: Walter C Stickney, Associate Engineer at (909) 477-2740, ext. 4076. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this 17th day of August, 2005 Publish Dates: August 24 and August 31, 2005 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this 17th day of August, 2005. William J. Alexander, Mayor ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. August 17, 2005 Page 5 I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 17th day of August, 2005 Executed this 17th day of August, 2005, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk ADVERTISE ON: August 24 and August 31, 2005 R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A I ~ C o I~II~l U N I Ty S E R ¥I C E S StaffR DATE: August 17, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director BY: Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III SUBJECT: REQUEST TO APPROVE AND APPROPRIATE FUNDS RECEIVED FROM THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES/ADMINISTRATION ON AGING FOR A GRANT IN THE AMOUNT OF $146,866 FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF A SENIOR WELLNESS AND TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (FUND 1270401) RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve and appropriate funds received from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services/Administration on Aging for a grant in the amount of $146,866 for the implementation of a senior wellness and transportation program to be funded from Fund 1270401 ($10,654 from account number 1270401-5605; $2,250 from account number 1270401-5152; $43,356 from account number 1270401-5200; and $90,606 from account number 1270401-5300). BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: With assistance from Congressman David Dreier, the City of Rancho Cucamonga was designated in the Health and Human Services Appropriation for Federal Fiscal Year 2005 to receive a grant under Title IV of the Older Americans Act. The total amount of federal assistance available to the City for this grant was $146,866. A grant application was submitted in April 2005, to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services/Administration on Aging to utilize these funds to implement a senior wellness and transportation program. Staff recently received notification that our grant application was approved for funding. The Senior Wellness and Transportation Program that will be implemented through this grant will include classes, programs, workshops and specialized materials for seniors to participate in and utilize to maintain and enhance their lives. In addition, City Council Request to Approve and Appropriate Funds for Implementation of a Senior Wellness and Transportation Program August 17, 2005 Page 2 the program will improve participation and access to health, wellness and fitness information and services by providing much needed transportation to and from the James L. Brutle Senior Center at Central Park. Staff requests that the City Council approve and appropriate the funds received by the Department of Health and Human Services/Administration on Aging for the implementation of this Senior Wellness and Transportation Program so work on this important program for our senior community can begin. FISCAL IMPACT: This grant required matching funds in the amount $48,960 that are proposed to be funded through the Community Services Department's Recreation Fund 250. Respec fully submitted, Kevin M Communil, Services Director ~C~MMSERV~C~unci~&B~ard$t~ityC~unciASta~Rep~rtst2~5~Appr~ve~Appr~prfateFundsSrWe~ne$$ TransportationS. 17. 05. doc T H C I T Y © F RANCHO C U CAI~I 0 N G A Staff Report DATE: August 9, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FRO~ Trang Huynh, Building&Safety Official/////~/~ff ~ BY: Dawn Haddon, Purchasing Manager Manuel Pilionieta, IS Manager SUBJEL'T: APPROVAL TO PURCHASE THREE (3) COMPUTER SERVERS FROM GSTI, UTILIZING A U.S. COMMUNITIES COMPETITIVELY BID CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $39,876. FROM ACCOUNT NO 1016301-5605. RECOMMENDATION APPROVAL TO PURCHASE THREE (3) COMPUTER SERVER FROM GSTI, UTILIZING A U.S. COMMUNITIES COMPETITIVELY BID CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $39,876. FROM ACCOUNT NO. 1016301-5605. BACKGROUND In July of this year, the City Council authorized an Interactive Voice Response Software and Hardware project to proceed with a e-Connect project that allows citizens and developers to use the Internet to schedule inspections, check status of open inspections and initiate and check permit and plan check status. This project includes an Integrated Voice Response (IVR) system that will give citizens the ability to complete a variety of transactions and query information over the phone. Among one of the requirements of the system was the purchase of web and application servers. Specifications were provided to Purchasing for review. After analysis, Purchasing has determined that it is best to acquire the servers utilizing a U.S. Communities competitively bid contract for the total amount of $39,876. Building & Safety Official R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A I I COI'IM U N I TY SERVICES DATE: August 17, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III Karen McGuire-Emery, Senior Park Planner SUBJECT: PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE RECOMMENDATION: In accordance with the City Council's request to become more informed of park and recreation facility issues, programs, projects and events, this report is provided to highlight pertinent issues, projects and programs occurring in both the Community Services Department and the Park Design/Development and Maintenance Sections of Engineering. This report is provided to the City Council for informational purposes only. No action need be taken on this item. A. PARKS AND FACILITIES UPDATE Central Park: · Certificate of Occupancy issued on May 21, 2005. Contractor continuing to work on punch list items. Central Park Landscape and Irrigation Project: · Landscape area along Milliken in final stages of maintenance period. Anticipated acceptance by early September. Rancho Cucamonga Cultural Center Project: · Building construction proceeding well. Theater - Have completed steel installation in this portion. Continuing to install the mechanical/electrical and plumbing in the theater seat area as well as fireproof the steel. Working on framing the exterior walls. Event Center - Working on the installation of the mechanical/electrical and plumbing in the overhead, as well as the in the exterior walls, and working on the exterior and interior wall framing and setting the doorframes. Library - Continuing work on the overhead and exterior wall mechanical/electrical and plumbing installation, as well as framing the interior library walls. Mayor and Members of the City Council Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update August 17, 2005 Victoria Arbors Park: · Project complete. Dedication and ribbon cutting scheduled for Saturday, August 13, 2005 at 10:00 am. B. COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE Senior Programs and Services: · Antique Road Show, Saturday, August 20, 2005, 9:00 a.m. We have our own version of the popular television show. Bring that old vase or childhood toy that's collecting dust and get it appraised by an antique expert. Registration taken at the door! Call (909) 477-2780 for more information. · Chaffe¥ Adult School Classes - The James L. Brulte Senior Center will host 6 Chaffey Adult School Classes beginning August 29, 2005. Classes include: Drawing, Watercolor, Oil Painting, Citizenship, Italian, Spanish and various computer classes. The days and times of each of the classes vary; interested seniors are encouraged to call the Center for moro information. · Senior Advisory Committee will hold its next regular meeting on Monday, September 26, 9:00 a.m. at the Senior Center. Trips and Tours: · Kin.q Tutanhkamun Exhibition, Saturday, August 27th. Join us as we visit the first United States venue and the only west coast showing of King Tutankhamun's Troasuros. We will battle the traffic and parking for you in our deluxe motorcoach. King Tut's treasures will go on display for the first time in 27 years featuring the ancient ruler's gold crown, carved dagger and a massive gold and cloisonn~ necklace, "Tutankhamun and the Golden Age of the Pharaoh" will include about 130 of the 5,000 Egyptian artifacts found in King Tut's tomb and additional ancient sites. After we see the treasuros we will stop a Lawry's for lunch with your choice of prime rib or salmon (included in the price). Cost: $77.00 per person. · Catalina., Saturday, August 20th. Come to Southern California's Island Paradise! After a short cruise to the island you have the opportunity to stroll around at your leisure. Enjoy shopping, dining, snorkeling and a variety of tours. Cost: $69.00 per person. · NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Thursday, August 24th. The Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), managed by the California Institute of Technology, is NASA's lead center for the robotic exploration of the solar system. JPL also manages the world-wide Deep Space Network, which communicates with spacecraft and conducts scientific investigations from its complexes in the Mojave Desert Near Gold. Stone; near Madrid, Spain; and near Canberra, Australia. JPL cameras and sensors are aboard satellites circling Earth to study the ozone, oceans and other Earth sciences. On the way home there we'll stop for lunch (on your own) at Beadles Cafeteria in Pasadena. All participants must have a picturo I.D. on the day of the trip. No guns, knives, scissors, etc. allowed at JPL. Must have correct name and address for all participants. JPL does not allow any additions to the trip roster of participants or substitutions 5 days prior to date of trip. Cost: $26.00 per person. Mayor and Members of the City Council Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update August 17, 2005 Teens: · The table below summarizes teen pro,qram attendance for the month of July 2005: Program/Activity Attendance - July 2005 Teen Center 803 Spruce Skate Facility 1,140 TRAC - Snack Bars 189 volunteers; 2,085 hours TRAC - Babysitting 77 participants; 17 volunteers Teen Connection/Summer Volunteen 162 Volunteers; 689 hours Connection · July was a groat month for the Teen Center. We celebrated our first ever Fear Factor week that proved to be a huge success. Teens competed furiously in the following events: pool table buffet, spaghetti surprise, dodge ball galore, spoons full of disgust and an obstacle course. At the end only the strongest survived winning a free trip to one of our popular Teen Center outings, second place winner took home a gift certificate for a night out at the movies and third place winner took home a ten-dollar gift certificate to Target. To keep cool and end off the month, teens attended our annual trip to Pharaohs Lost Kingdom and escaped the heat. · Teen trips continue this month with a trip to Knott's Berry Farm, the always popular, Six Flags Magic Mountain and our annual summer camping trip to Campland Mission Bay. · The Spruce Skate Park - Staff meets with teens using the facility on the second Thursday of the month. Items discussed generally include: park issues, new safety information, laws and upcoming major events in other cities. · REAL Hi(Ih School Advisory Committee - The REAL committee (acronym for Rancho · Cucamonga, Etiwanda, Alta Loma and Los Osos high schools) began discussing potential special events for High School Students. The committee consists of 10 students from the following High Schools A.S.B. (Associated Student Body): Etiwanda High School, Los Osos High School, and Rancho High School and Alta Loma High School. Upcoming meetings aro scheduled for August. · Teen Recreation Activity Club (TRAC) - Members kept busy throughout the month of July with the Alta Loma High School pool snack bar and with movies and concerts in the park snack bars. · The TRAC Babysittinq program continues to grow. Parents are very comfortable with the supervision and enjoy this program because it has a lot to offer, crafts, games, movies, snacks and plenty of fun. It allows the parent's and their children an affordable night out on the town. · Summer Volunteen Connection - This program allows young teens an opportunity to learn job skills. Teens are required to complete an application, go through an interview and if accepted into the program must attend a mandatory training. They are responsible for time cards and assisting in the programs they have been assigned. At the end of their assignment they receive a performance evaluation and certificate of completion. · Mayor and Members of the City Council Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update August 17, 2005 Youth Activities: · The table below summarizes youth program attendance for the month of July. Program Classes/Sites Registrants Attendance Play Camp 56 classes/3 sites 1,051 7,571 Kid Explorers 8 classes/1site 177 2,832 Camp Cucamonga 4 sessions 324 6,156 Mobile Recreation 5 sites 246 "Fun on the Run" Lewis Partnership 2 sites 0 270 Kids Club Evergreen & Del Mar Apartments · Our 2005 Play Camp for children ages 1 - 5 runs Monday, June 27 - Friday August 19, 2005. Play Camp is located at Lions Center East and West and the Goldy S. Lewis Community Center. Play Camp participant will enjoy arts and crafts, meeting new friends, out door recreation play, learn socialization skills and build on large and small motor skills. · Kid Explorers is a half-day program for children ages 5 - 10 and runs MondayNVednesday or Tuesday/Thursday, from July 5 through August 11, 2005. Kid Explorers take place at Lions Center East. This fun filled summer program will explore the earth, planets, the environment through the use of arts and crafts and is a great way youngster can meet new friends, enjoy out door recreation play and more. · Our summer camp program, Camp Cucamon,qa, for children ages 5-12 meets at Alta Loma High School. The program began on Monday, June 20, 2005 and will continue for nine weeks ending on Friday, August 19, 2005. Participants enjoy themed activity weeks, swimming on Tuesday and Thursday and exciting field trips on Wednesday along with arts and crafts, games, sports and organized activities. · Our Mobile Recreation Program, Fun On the Run, summer session runs from July 5th through August 26th at the following parks: Day of the Week Park Location Program Time Monday Bear Gulch 11 am - 3 pm Tuesday Hermosa 11 am - 3 pm Wednesday Old Town 11 am - 3 pm Thursday Heritage 11 am - 3 pm Friday Windrows 11 am - 3 pm · Lewis Partnership Proqram - Pool parties, water balloons, and squirt guns have been this month theme at the Lewis Kids Club that operates out of the Evergreen and Del Mar Apartments in the Terra Vista community. Thanks to a great parent who donated movies to our Evergreen location we had some really fantastic movie day sowing The Sandlot being my favorite. On July 25th youngsters participated in a Fear Factor kids style event complete with egg races, an obstacle course and eating sour gummy worms with no hands. Mayor and Members of the City Council Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update August 17, 2005 Participating youngsters had a great time and there was a prize for the winner. Upcoming Lewis special events include: ~' 8/19 - show and tell @ Evergreen ~ 8/22 - ice cream party ~ 8/26 - FNL Beach Trip ~ 8/29 - scavenger hunt @ Del Mar Youth Sports: · The table below summarizes youth sports activities for the reporting period: Activity # Participants Age/Gender # Teams Aquatics 675 6months-adult N/A Pee Wee Baseball 620 3-5/boys & girls 62 Youth Basketball 935 6-16/boys & girls 104 Youth Volleyball Camp 45 8-14/boys & girls N/A Youth Basketball Camp 40 8-14/boys & girls N/A Youth Sports Camp - RC Family 160 6-12/boys & girls N/A Sports Center Youth Sports Camp - CMS 120 6-12/boys & ~]irls N/A Northtown Youth Basketball 59 6-17/boys & girls 6 Northtown Play Camp 23 6-13/boys & girls N/A Cucamonga Middle School 80 8-adult N/A (CMS) Judo Cucamonga Middle School 140 8-14/boys & girls 14 (CMS) Youth Basketball Practice RC Family Sports Center: · The table below provides drop-in/open play participation at the Center for the reporting period: Activity # Participants Adult Basketball 262 Youth Basketball 765 Adult Racquetball 364 Youth Racquetball 75 Adult Volleyball 45 Youth Volleyball 13 Jazzercise 1,252 · The table on the following page summarizes organized Adult Activity at the Sports Center during the reporting period: Activity # Participants Age/Gender # Teams Racquetball 24 Adult/Male & Females N/A Basketball (full court) 180 Adult/Males 18 Basketball (3-on-3) 60 Adult/Males 12 ?/ Mayor and Members of the City Council Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update August 17, 2005 Adult Sports: · The table below summarizes adult sport activities at the Epicenter for the reporting period: Activity # Participants # Teams Gender Softball 2,640 165 Males/Females Football 50 5 Males Soccer 672 42 Males/Females Tennis 36 N/A Males/Females · There are four (4) adult softball tournaments scheduled for the month of August at the Epicenter and Adult Sports Park. Sports Advisory Committee: · The next meeting of the Sports Advisory Committee will take place on October 12th. The 2006 spring (February 1, 2006 through July 31, 2006) field requests will be due at this meeting. Special Events: · On Saturday, August 13m we celebrated the Grand Opening and Ribbon Cutting Ceremony for Victoria Arbors Park. The event took place from 10:00 a.m. until 1:00 p.m. and included: a ribbon cutting ceremony, inflatable and fun filled activities for youngsters, free food and giveaways. With the addition of this new neighborhood park there are now 295 acres of parkland for our residents to enjoy. · Join us for an evening under the stars with our Concerts in the Park series that beginning on runs through August 25th on Thursday evenings at 7:00 p.m. at the Red Hill Park Amphitheater. The remainder of this summer's lineup of bands include: > August 18th Ronny & the Classics (Oldies) > August 25th The Answer (Classic Rock) Food will also be available for purchase beginning at 6pm. Join us for dinner at the Park and enjoy everything from BBQ to Mexican, then settle in for the concerts with your funnel cake and kettle corn! · Our Movies in the Park series began the week of July 11th and continues through August 19th. The last movie in our series will be The Sponge Bob Squarepants Movie (PG) that will run the week of August 15th at the following locations. > *Mondays Central Park > *Tuesdays Chaffey Town Square at Victoria Gardens > Wednesdays Windrows Park > Fridays Red Hill Park *New days & park locations! All movies begin at dusk. Snacks will be available for purchase courtesy of our Teen Recreation Activity Club (T.R.A.C.) at Central Park, Windrows Park and Red Hill Park. In the warmth of the summer nights ... grab your blankets and lawn chairs and enjoy our fantastic flicks with the entire family. Mayor and Members of the City Council Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update August 17, 2005 Cultural and Performing Arts: · Just as other summer programs were winding down, a new four-week program was offered this summer at the RC Theatre Arts Center from July 25~ through August 18th offering youngsters a great Opportunity to develop their singing, dancing and acting skills and star in their own show. The Summer Youth Intensive Pro,qram (SYI) meets Monday through Thursday from 1:00 until 4:00 p.m. providing students, age 8 to 18, with instruction, rehearsal and their time on stage to perform in "The Best of Broadway Revue" to be presented Saturday, August 20th at Chaffey College Theatre. Two performances will be offered, at 5:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. The program is conducted by RC Theatre Arts Academy instructors Don Cloud (vocal instruction) and Patricia Doublet-DeLion (dance and acting). Thirty students enrolled in the program's first year. Program fee is $150 for the 4-week long program. Tickets for the performance are $5 each available at the theatre prior to each performance. · Ten local adults have taken on new personalities in Nell Simon's comedy play "Rumors" to be presented at the RC Theatre Arts Center August 25th, 26th and 27th. As part o-'~'~-e Theatre Arts Academy program, the Adult Actors Workshop offers adult actors to take their acting skills from the page to the stage offedng a one weekend public performance of a full-length play. Directed by Theatre Arts Academy instructor Carlos Baldeon, the cast was selected from an open audition and meets Tuesday and Thursday evenings for rehearsal and character development. The program also offers local theatre arts graduates the opportunity to share their skills to design and manage a full production. This production will present set design and construction by Rich Kirchhoff and Stage Management by Domi Chuatrakul, both graduates of Cai Poly Pomona Theatre Department, where Baldeon is also a former graduate and part-time Instructor. Tickets for the City's first adult play are $8, available at the door and can be reserved by calling the Theatre Arts Center. Contract Classes: Summer classes that run from June 18th through August 26th are going great. Some of our new summer offerings have included: Music Pups, Groovin' Guitar, Bubble Maker Scuba, Red Hot Robots, Little Bitty Workshops, Violin, Balance/Stability Ball Fitness, Youth and Adult Scuba and Just Desserts Cooking. Litty Bitty Workshops at Central Park have been extremely successful. Staff has been very pleased with many of the off site location visits. The table below summarizes are summer session recreation class attendance. Number of Classes Registration Number Attendance 278 98 946 · Tech Junction offers one-day senior computer classes Monday through Thursday from 10:00 a.m. until 11:00 a.m. for a total of three weeks. Each class is full with 20 students. Tech Junction offers Word, Excel, Power Point and beginning computer classes. There are 127 students on the waitlist for the beginning computer class. The tables on the following page summarize Computer Classes and Use of the Computer Room at the Goldy S. Lewis Community Center/James L. Brulte Senior Center Mayor and Members of the City Council Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update August 17, 2005 Number of Classes Registration Number Attendance 7 140 554 Computer Room Use I Attendance General Public Use - Walk-in 24 Walk In with questions but don't use the 291 computers Phone Calls 52 · Staff is working to start up a Special Needs Pm.qram in the fall that will offer classes and activities for those individuals in our community that may need have special needs or require extra assistance. Facilities: · The table below displays building rental and recreation contract class attendance numbers for the month of July 2005: Facility Rentals/Bookings Facility Hours '~ Attendance of Use Lions Center East Rentals 48 770 Lions Center East Building 4,005 471 Lions Center West Rentals 195 7,170 Lions Center West Building 12,312 531 Goldy S. Lewis Community 4,012 510 Center Building Goldy S. Lewis Community 177 4,180 Center Rentals · Central Park rentals began on Saturday, July 2nd. Community interest in holding meetings, events and special occasions at Central has proven to be even stronger than anticipated. · Staff is continuing to meet quarterly with users of the Equestrian Center to address maintenance needs and programming. Our local groups are very cooperative and supportive of the City's efforts. · Park monitors keep daily reports of activities in our parks, often helping out residents in need of assistance. Parks and Facilities: · The table below and on the following page provides usage information for park picnic shelters and special use facilities for the month of July 2005: Park/Shelter Attendance # Applications # Rentals Hours of Use Red Hill 2940 47 59 315 Heritage 1405 19 25 86 Milliken 530 18 20 92 Hermosa 405 11 14 39 Coyote Canyon 355 8 14 33 Mayor and Members of the City Council Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update August 17, 2005 Park/Shelter Attendance # Applications # Rentals Hours of Use Civic Center 575 3 3 20 Courtyard Amphitheatm 290 4 4 32 TOTAL 6600 110 139 617 Equestrian Participants*: 3 6 14 130 Spectators: 0 * Equestrfan participants include drop-in use. Epicenter Rentals/Activities: ,~ The following activities/rentals took place during the reporting period: > RSA USA, Inc. - Commercial Filming - August 5, 2005 - Epicenter Stadium and Parking Lot A. · Staff is working with the following applicants for upcominq rentals and activities: > Showtime - TV Filming - August 19, 2005 - Epicenter Stadium. > AYSO - Picture Day - September 10, 2005 - Epicenter Soccer Fields. > WFS Financial - Used Car Sale - September 21-26, 2005 - Epicenter Special Event Area. > AYSO - 30~h Anniversary Celebration - October 1, 2005 - Epicenter Stadium. > Water of Life Church - Anniversary Sen/ice & Concert - October 9, 2005 - Epicenter Stadium. > Chaffey College Foundation - Concert- October 15, 2005 - Epicenter Stadium. > Rotary Club of Rancho Cucamonga - Festival & Go Cart Races - October 22, 2005 - Epicenter Special Event Area. > Christian Okoye Foundation - Youth Holiday Event and 5/10K Run - December 10, 2005 - Epicenter Parking Lots A & B and City streets. > Freedom Films - Feature Filming - February/March 2006 - Epicenter Stadium. > Aray Artist - Music Festival - May 2006 - Epicenter Stadium. Park and Recreation Commission: · The next meetin,q of the Park and Recreation Commission will take place on Thursday, August 18, 2005. The following items are scheduled to be discussed/acted upon at this meeting: > Update on the Senior Advisory Committee. ~> Update on the Sports Advisory Committee. ~> Update on Central Park. ;> Quarterly update on Departmental programming > Review of proposed ~'ees changes. > Update on the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center project. > Review of proposed fees for the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center. > Review of Departmental proposed fee changes. ~> Update regarding issues and options associated with vehicular parking on residential streets near Heritage Park. > Appointment to various Commission Subcommittees. 75 Mayor and Members of the City Council Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update August 17, 2005 Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation: · The next regularly scheduled meeting of the Executive Committee of the Community Foundation will take place on September 14, 2005. · The next regularly scheduled meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation Board of Directors will take place on October 12, 2005. P,e~ V ~- Kevin McA~dle ~ Joe O'Neil Community Services Director City Engineer I:tCOMMSERV~Council&Boatd$~CityCouncil~StaffReports~OOS~update7.20. OS. doc R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Staff Report DATE: August 17, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Mark Brawthen, Contract Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 3 FOR DRC2003-00719, LOCATED ON THE NORTH EAST CORNER OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD AND HIGHLAND AVENUE SUBMITTED BY PACIFIC GLOBE, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving DRC2003-00719, accepting the subject agreement and security, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 3, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS DRC2003-00719, located on the north east corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Highland Avenue in the Village Commercial Development District, was approved by the Planning Commission on February 11, 2004 for the development of a gas station convenience store and fast food restaurant on 1.48 acres of vacant land. The Developer, Pacific Globe Inc., is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $79,200.00 Labor and Material Bond: $39,600.00 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2003-00719 - PACIFIC GLOBE INC. August17,2005 Page 2 A letter of approval has been received from Cucamonga Valley Water District. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms signed by the Developer are on file in the City Clerk's Office. Copies of the agreement and securities are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully Submitted, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ENGINEERING DIVISION William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:MB:pjb Attachments VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE PROJECT - SI~ ST. :' 2 0 '< FREEWAY HIGHLAND AVE c5 z LI.J FOOTHILL BLVD. VIC~ 1V[A~P City of Item: DRC2003-00719 Rancho Cucamonga Title: VICINITY MAP ENGINEERING EXHIBIT: 1 DIVISION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND 'IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DRC2003-00719 WHEREAS, THE City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement by Pacific Globe Inc., a California Corporation as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the north east comer of Day Creek Boulevard and Highland Avenue; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property referred to as DRC2003-00719; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: 1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and 2. That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the Cit~' Attorney. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 3 FOR DRC2003- 00719 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "72 Act"), said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 2, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Acto of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public heating and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding the such provisions of the 1972 Act related to the annexation of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the maintenance Districts on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have ~xpressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act and/or Article XIIID applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amount snot to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The above recitals are all true and correct SECTION 2: This City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvements. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts, approves the financing bf the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. 2 DRC2003-00719 ~ Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property To Be Annexed The Owners of the Property are: Pacific Globe, Inc., a California Corporation The legal description of the Property is: THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL GOVERNMENT PLAT THEREOF, AND THAT PORTION OF LOT A, OF TRACT NO. 12046, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA PER MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 168, PAGES I THROUGH 7 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT NO. 12046, DISTANT THEREON SOUTH 0°07'39" WEST, 9.317 METERS FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST ONE-HALF OF THE WEST ONE-HALF OF THE NORTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 32; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, SOUTH 0007'39'' WEST, 12.019 METERS TO THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT A; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, SOUTH 0°07'39'' WEST, 17.475 METERS TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 180.00 METERS, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID CURVE BEARS NORTH 38°I 1'02" WEST; THENCE NORTHEASTERLy ALONG SAID CURVE, 31.563 METERS THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10o02'48'' TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT A; THENCE CONTINUING NORTHEASTERLy ALONG SAID CURVE, 59.576 METERS THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 18°57'47"; THENCE ON A RADIAL LINE TO SAID CURVE NORTH 9°10'25'' WEST, 1.898 METERS TO THE NORTHERLy LINE OF SAID SECTION 32; THENCE SOUTH 84°01'59" WEST, 44.628 METERS TO A POINT HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS POINT "B"; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 84o01'59'' WEST, 38.024 METERS TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL 2: LOT 73 TRACT NO. 15875, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 278 OF MAPS, PAGES 8 TO 13, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. The above described parcels are shown on sheet A-2 attached herewith and by this reference made a part hereof. A-1 DRC2003-00719 ~ EXHIBIT "A" ASSESSMENT DLAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 STREETLIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 3 RTE 210 EASTBOUND ON-RAMP ........ .~, ,tm ........... . .... t,.,, ____ .._._.... ~.~-.'r. ~ ~ ~' -53033' .... r ~ ~ /~ .... .... I :::_:;:':l:~< / LEGEND ~1 e~., ~N DAy cREEK, ]Ge~,, ON ~I¢..jHL.AN, D A CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NO~T. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~ "8¢ Exhibit B To Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2005/2006 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (VICTORIA): Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (LMD #2) represents landscape sites throughout the Victoria Planned Community. These sites are associated with areas within Victoria and as such any benefit derived from thc landscape installation can bc directly attributed to those parcels within that community. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that planned community. Thc sites maintained by thc district consist of parkways, median islands, street trees, paseos, community trails and parks. The 32.37 acres of parks in Victoria consist of Kenyon Park, Victoria Groves Park, Vintage Park, Windrows Park and Ellena Park. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (GENERAL CITY): Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD #1) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide dis~ct. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 (VICTORIA): Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (SLD #3) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located within the Victoria Planned Community. Generally, this area encompasses the area of the City east of Deer Creek Channel, south of Highland Avenue, north of Base Line Road, and west of Etiwanda Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. This sites maintained by the district consist of streetlights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the Victoria Planned Community. B-1 DRC2003-00719 ~5 Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2005/2006) For Project: PM 16565 Number of Lamps Street Lights 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L SLD # 1 ___ SLD # 3 ...... 2 --- Community Trail Turf Non-Turf Trees Landscaping DGSF SF SF EA LMD # 1 -__ *Existing items installed with original project Assessment Units by District Acres S 1 S 3 L 2 1.48 2.96 2.96 2.96 B-2 DRC2003-00719 ~6 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2005/2006 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (VICTORIA): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $422.00 for thc fiscal year 2005/0(5. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Victoria Planned Community): # of Physical Assessment # of Rate Per Units Units Factor Assessment Assessment Land Use Type Units Unit Revenue Single Family Parcel 5060 1.00 5060 $422.00 $2,177,520.00 Multi- Family Parcel 124 1.00 124 $422.00 $52,328.00 Comm/Ind. Acre 44.18 2.00 88.36 $422.00 $37,287.92 Vacant Acre 337.97 0.25 84.4925 $422.00 $35,655.84 TOTAL $2,302,791.76 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (DRC2003-00719) is: 1.48 Acres x 2 A.U. Factor x $422.00 Rate Per A.U. = $1,249.12 Annual Assessment STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I (ARTERIAL STREETS): Thc rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2005/06. Thc following table summarizes thc asscssment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Family Parcel 21,151 1.00 21,151 $17.77 $375,853.27 Multi-Family Unit 8,540 1.00 8,540 $17.77 $151,755.80 Commercial Acre 2,380.36 2.00 4,760.72 $17.77 $84,597.99 TOTAL $612,207.06 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (DRC2003-00719) is: 1.48 Acres x 2 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. -- $52.60 Annual Assessment C-1 DRC2003-007l 9 '97 STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 (VICTOR/A): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $47.15 £or the fiscal year 2005/06. The £ollowing table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community): # of # o£ Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Tyne Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Family Parcel 5160 1.00 5160 $47.15 $243,294.00 Multi- Family Unit 124 1.00 124 $47.15 $5,846.60 Commercial Acre 44.18 2.00 88.36 $47.15 $4,166.17 Vacant 10.95 2.0 21.90 $47.15 $1,032.59 TOTAL $254,339.36 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (DRC2003-00719) is.' 1.48 Acres x 2 A.U. Factor x $47.15 Rate Per A.U. = $139.56 Annual Assessment C-2 DRC2003~00719 gl~ I~ A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTHENT SlaffR ort DATE: August 17, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Michael L. TenEyck, Administrative Resources Manager SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT EXTENSION WITH ASTRUM UTILITY SERVICES IN THE AMOUNT OF $30,000 FOR UTILITY BILLING SERVICES FUNDED FROM ACCT NO. 17053035309, MUNICIPAL UTILITY ACCOUNT RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve a Professional Services Agreement Extension with ASTRUM Utility Services in the amount of $30,000 for Utility Billing Services, to be funded from Acct No. 17053035309, Municipal Utility Account balance. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: On August 31, 2001, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council authorized the creation and operation of a municipally owned utility for the purpose of providing various utility services. Subsequently, on August 21, 2002, the Redevelopment Agency authorized the filing of a Wholesale Distribution Access Tariff (WDAT) Application with Southern California Edison Company (SCE) for the provision of electric service by the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility. In accordance with' the SCE Interconnection Facilities Agreement, the City constructed the Arbors Substation at the southeast corner of Rochester Avenue and Stadium Parkway. Distribution facilities were subsequently constructed from the Arbors Substation to customers' facilities. The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code has been modified to establish Electric Service Rules and Electric Rates and Tariffs to further the orderly distribution of the electric power the to City's retail customers. Rates, fees and charges may be amended from time to time by resolution. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT APPROVAL OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH ASTRUM UTILITY SERVICES FOR PREPARING MONTHLY BILLS FOR THE CITY'S ELECTRIC CUSTOMERS. AUGUST 17, 2005 PAGE 2 The City's Electric Rates and Tariffs include six customer classes: small commercial; medium commercial; large commercial; street lighting, outdoor area lighting and traffic control. Electric bills are generally based upon the amount of electricity consumed over a specific period of time. Medium and large commercial customers are also charged for the maximum amount of energy consumed at a particular point in time (i.e. peak demand). Electric rates for consumption and demand can also vary based upon the time of day, day of week and/or month. The City issues more than 200 bills every month. Respectful!y Submitted, William 3-. O'Neil City Engineer W JO:MT the city of Rancho Cucamonga DATE: August 17, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Lack lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Candyce Burnett, Associate Planner SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO EXECUTE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH MICHAEL BRANDMAN ASSOCIATES, NOT TO EXCEED $64,500, FOR THE PREPARATION OF A SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (DRC2004-01204) FOR THE NORTH EASTERN SPHERE ANNEXATION PROJECT, IN RANCHO CUCAMONGA'S SPHERE OF INFLUENCE AND FOR THE AUTHORIZATION TO RE-APPROPRIATE $66,000 OUT OF AB1600 RESERVES INTO ACCOUNT NUMBER 1016301-5300 (CONTRACT SERVICES) IN CONNECTION WITH THE CITY/COUNTY INITIATED ANNEXATION. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council, through minute action, to authorize the mayor to execute the Professional Services Agreement awarding the contract to Michael Brandman Associates and to authorize staff to re-appropriate $66,000 out of AB1600 reserves into account number 1016301-5300 to provide funding for costs associated with the proposed annexation of approximately 4,115 acres. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The proposed project referred to as "North Eastern Sphere Annexation" consists of an annexation of approximately 4,115 acres of land, generally located north of the. City boundary, between Haven Avenue and the City of Fontana border. Currently, the majority of the project site is designated as primarily Flood Control and Public Utilities Land on the City's General Plan and pre-zoned by the Etiwanda North Specific Plan as Flood Control, Resource Conservation, and Hillside Residential. In addition, there is no City Zoning designation for 680 acres of the site generally located between Haven Avenue extending approximately 6,430 feet easterly, which the City is proposing to designate to Flood Control/Utility Corridor (390 acres), Open Space (268 acres), and Hillside Residential (21 acres). A Development District Amendment will be required for pre-zoning purposes. No General Plan Amendment is required to accommodate the project. An amendment to the City's Etiwanda North Specific Plan will be necessary to accommodate the proposed project. Amendments to that plan shall consist of amending Hillside Residential designated land to Resource Conservation for those pamels that have been established as conservation habitat. Following City approval of the proposed project, a request will be submitted to the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) to annex the North Eastern Sphere Annexation project site into the City of Rancho Cucamonga. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT - MBA August 17, 2005 Page 2 No development is proposed as part of this project. The annexation of this area will coordinate future development while providing the continued conservation of open space and controlled development of properties. On March 16, 2005 the City Council authorized the Appropriation of $76,000 out of AB1600 Reserves to provide the funding for costs associated with the proposed annexation. Start Hoffman Associates was selected to prepare the Fiscal Analysis and Plan of Service for the proposed project. Staff, based on input from the City Attorney, determined that an Environmental Impact Report should be prepared for the project. The staff began the selection process by distributing a Request for Qualifications/Request for Proposal (RFQ/RFP) to several environmental consulting firms in Southern California, from which two responded. Based on a review of their proposal for Scope of ServicesANork with cost estimates, Michael Brandman Associates has been selected for City Council consideration. The contract is for $64,500. The original appropriation of $76,000 was for Budget year 2004-2005. Therefore, staff is requesting that the City Council re-appropriate the remaining $66,000 ($10,000 encumbered for Stan Hoffman Associates) out of AB1600 reserves into account number 1016301-5300 to provide funding for costs associated with the proposed annexation. City Planner Attachments: Exhibit A Request For Proposal/Qualifications (RFP/RFQ) Exhibit B - Michael Brandman Associates Proposal Dated July 14, 2005 Exhibit C March 16, 2005 City Council Staff Report Mayor WILLIAM J. ALEXANDER Mayor Pro Ton DN, NE WILLIAMS Councilmember$ REx GUTIERP, EZ L. DENNtS MICHAEL SAM fiPAGNOLO City Manager THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ' Jack LAM, AICP cRANCHO UCAMONGA June 6, 2005 RBF Consulting Glen Lajoie, AICP, Vice President 14725 Alton Parkway, Irvine, CA 92618-2027 SUBJECT: Pre-zone and North Eastern Sphere Annexation Supplemental General Plan EIR (DRC2004-01204 and DRC2004-01208) Request for Proposals Dear Mr. Lajoie: The City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Department is seeking proposals to prepare and process a Supplemental General Plan Environmental Impact Report for the North Eastern Sphere Annexation Project. In general, the projects consists of an annexation of approximately4,115 acres of land, generally located north of the City boundary, between Haven Avenue and the City of Fontana border. Approximately 680 acres of land, generally located between Haven Avenue extending approximately 6,430 feet eastedy and will be pre-zoned in conformance with the existing General Plan. The balance of the annexation area is already pre-zoned as part of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan. Amendments to that plan shall consist of amending Hillside Residential designated land to Resource Conservation for those parcels that have been established as conservation habitat. Additional information (General Plan EIR, and Etiwanda North Specific Plan EIR) is available for consideration dudng preparation of an RFP by contacting me at (909) 477-2750, ext. 4308 or e-mail me at cbumett@ci.rancho-cucamonga.ca.us. The Request for Proposals is due by July 15, 2005. You may contact me, if you have any questions, Monday through Fdday between the hours of 7 a.m. to 6 p.m. Sincerely, Candy ~ce Bl:mlett Associate Planner CB/ge Enclosures: North Eastern Sphere Annexation Map Land Use Map Development District Amendment Map Existing San B~rnardino County Zoning 10500 Civic Center Dr. · EO. Box 807 ° Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-0807 · Tel 909477-2700 · Fax 909-477-2849 · www. ci.rancho-cucamonga.ca.us RFP Consultant List North Eastern Sphere Annexation MICHAEL BRANDMAN ASSOC. Thomas J. McGill, Ph.D. Regional Manager 621 E. Carnegie Ddve, Suite 260 San Bemardino, CA 92408 THE KEITH COMPANIES Gavin Archer 19 Technology Drive Irvine, CA 92618-2334 (949)923-6000 FX(949)923-6121 RBF & ASSOCIATES Glenn Lajoie 14725 Alton Pkwy Irvine, CA 92618 (714) 472-3505 FX (714) 472-8373 APPLIED PLANNING INC. Ross Geller 2151 Convention Center Way, Suite 122 Ontario, CA 91764 (909) 937-0333 FX (909) 937-0341 PSOMAS AND ASSOCIATES Craig Gooch 1700 Iowa Ave, Suite 160 Riverside, CA 92507 LILBURN CORP. Cheryl Tubbs 1905 Business Center Dr. San Bernardino Ca 92408 909-890-1818 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS DATE: June 8, 2005 GOAL: The City of Rancho Cucamonga is seeking proposals to prepare and process a Supplemental General Plan Environmental Impact Report for the North Eastern Sphere Annexation Project. The update must include specific public participation opportunities, meet all legal requirements, and be user friendly with the most current computer access processes and methods available. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Prepare and process a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for the proposed project referred to herein as "North Eastern Sphere Annexation." Currently, the majodty of the project site is designated as primarily Flood Control and Public Utilities Land on the City's General Plan and pre-zoned bythe Etiwanda North Specific Plan as Flood Control (FC), Resource Conservation (RC) and Hillside Residential. In addition, there is no CityZoning designation for 680 acres of the site, which the City is proposing to change to Flood Control/Utility Corridor (390 acres), Open Space (268 acres), and Hillside Residential (21 acres), since the property is currently located in unincorporated San Bemardino County and was not pre-zoned previously. A Development Distdct Amendment will be required for pre-zoning purposes. No General Plan Amendment is required to accommodate the proposed project. An amendment to the City's Etiwanda North Specific Plan also will be necessary to accommodate the proposed project. Following City approval of the proposed project, a request will be submitted to the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) to annex the North Eastern Sphere Annexation project site into the City of Rancho Cucamonga. No development is proposed as part of this project. The annexation of this area will coordinate future development while providing the continued conservation of open space and controlled development of developable properties. The EIR shall be in conformance with State and City requirements and include the following basic components: · Initial Study and Notice of Preparation · Screen Check EIR · Draft EIR · Response to Comments · Final EIR · Mitigation Monitoring Program · EIR Certification Process · Public Headngs - Up to a total of four public hearings, two before the Planning Commission and two before the City Council. · Findings for EIR Certification, including over-riding if needed. · Final EIR · Program Administration · Meetings, Graphics, and Time Table · Time Frame including present status. __ 5 NORTH EASTERN SPHERE ANNEXATION DRC2004-01204 AND DRC 2004-01208 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL June 8, 2005 Page 2 · City Staff Meetings - Conducted at least once a month. · Progress Reports - Submitted monthly. · Intergovernmental Coordination The consultant shall be responsible for conducting all meetings, preparing agendas, public notices, and mailing lists, postage, and related activities. The completed Environmental Impact Report (EIR) text, tables, charts, and maps must be user fdendly and be in a compatible format to the City's (Microsoft Word 97) word processing software. In addition to a minimum of fifty hard copies, the completed final update shall be made available on compact disks in a readable format. The EIR shall encompass the existing City'boundaries, the current Sphere-of-Influence, and the Fire Distdct boundaries. The EIR maps shall be coordinated with the City's Planning Department and Geographic Information System (GIS) staff and be formatted in compliance with existing City software requirements (ARCVIEW). SERVICES REQUIRED: Special studies shall include updating or providing new studies as needed and incorporating them into applicable sections of the EIR as follows: 1. Provide a Traffic Impact Analysis as necessary to satisfy the requirements of the San Bemardino County Congestion Management Program (CMP). 2. Update and cladfy endangered or sensitive habitat or species mapping. 3. Hydrology and drainage study. 4. Fiscal Impact analysis in conformance with LAFCO requirements (City provided along with the Plan of Services which is 80 percent complete). Provide separate cost evaluations in vour proposal for each study listed above. AMOUNT BUDGETED: City Budgeted - $66,000.00 CONTRACT TYPE: The City uses a Fixed Fee - Plus Actual Amount of Other Expenses, professional service contract, with a payment schedule based upon scheduled project component completion and City acceptance of the work. QUALIFICATIONS: Relevant professionalqualifications, managementqualifications, relevant project experience, logistical capabilities, financial qualifications, and special terms and conditions. Technical disciplines needed include: acoustical engineer, traffic engineer, urban/wild-land fire interface planner, fire facilities planner, botanist, and biologist. NORTH EASTERN SPHERE ANNEXATION DRC2004-01204 AND DRC 2004-01208 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL June 8, 2005 Page 3 EVALUATION: Each proposal will be evaluated by the City based on the following criteria: 1. Conciseness and cladty. 2. Professional qualifications and capability of the consultant team that is assigned to the project. 3. .Ability of the consultant firm to commit the personnel and time necessary to complete the project ~n the time frame outlined in the RFP response. 4. Experience with similar type projects. 5. Demonstration of a clear understanding of the project and the work to be performed. 6. Competitive cost. The firms that most closely meet the City's needs shall be invited to a presentation and evaluation interview. SUBM SSION DIRECTIONS: Firms interested in responding to this request must submit 10 copies of their proposal to the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Planning Department, no later than 5:00 p.m. on Monday, July 11,2005. Proposals received after the prescribed date and time will not be considered. Please address all proposals and inquires regarding this Request for Proposal to: Candyce Burnett Associate Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Mcl lei Brandrnan Ass )ciatcs ENVIRONI~IF2qTALSERVICF~S . PlaNNING . NATURAL~URCF~qMANAGEI~tENT August 4, 2005 Candyce Bumett Associate Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 SUBJECT: Proposal to Prepare an Environmental Document for the Pre-Zone and North Eastern Sphere Annexation (DRC2004-01204 and DRC2004-01208) Dear Ms. BurneR: Michael Brandman Associates (MBA) appreciates the opportunity to submit to the City of Rancho Cucamonga this proposal for the preparation of an environmental document for the Pre-Zone and North Eastern Sphere Annexation (DRC2004-01204 and DRC2004-01208). The MBA team will provide the City with a fully integrated approach that has been successfully providing similar services within the City of Rancho Cucamonga and its Sphere of Influence for over 10years. We feel that our proposal offers the City the strongest technical approach and the best team available in the region for gaining project approval and in meeting the City's long-range plann~g objectives. MBA has an excellent track record regarding legal challenges of its CEQA documents (i.e., no successful lawsuits). In addition, our recent work includes several projects in the foothill/alluvial fan portion of Rancho Cueumonga, including EIRs for the North Etiwanda Specific Plan, the General Plan Update, and the following projects that involved annexations: Carrari Ranch, the Tracy Project, TI" 16072 by Richland, and the Milliken Road Extension for Chaffey Joint Unified School District. The experience of MBA will prove to be invaluable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the applicant in taking this project from a coordinated inception to a successful completion. I am speaking for all the members &the MBA team when I say that we are grateful for the oppon'unity to submit this proposal and look forward to meeting with you to finalize the approach, scope, and budget. Should you desire additional information regarding this submittal or the capabilities of the project team, please contact me at (909) 884- 2255. This offer will remain in effect for 90 days. Sincerely, Thomas J. McGill, Ph.D., Principal/Regional Manager Michael Brandman Associates 621 E. Carnegie Drive, Suite 100 San Bernardino, CA 92408 TJM:sep Bakersfield Irv/ne Sacramento San Bemardino San Ramon Santa Cruz San Diego Visalia 661.334.2755 * 714.508,4100 · 916.296.4857 * 909.884.2255 * 925.830.2733 * 831.262.1731 · 619.823.4937 · 559.739,0400 www. brandman.com e-mail: mba~brandman.com 9g Proposal to Prepare a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for Pre-Zoning and.4nneXation of North Eastern Sphere July 2005 Prepared for: City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Contact: Candyce Bumett, Associate Planner Prepm'ed by: rl[l[]ffi Michael Brandman Associates 621 E. Carnegie Drive, Suite 100 San Bemardino, CA 92408 Contact: Kent Norton, AICP, REA, Director of Environmental Services Proposal for City of Rancho Cucamonga ~ Pre-Zone and North Eastern Sphere Annexation Supplemental General Plan EIR Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Section A- Introduction ...................................................................................................... 1 Project Understanding ...................................................................................................... 1 Major Issues ................. .'. ............................................. ; .................................................... 1 The MBA Approach .......................................................................................................... 2 Section B - Qualifications ................................................................................................... 4 Relevant Project Experience ............................................................................................ 4 Section C - Personnel ......................................................................................................... 8 The MBA Project Team .................................................................................................... 8 Senior Staff ...................................................................................................................... 9 Section D - Study Methodology ................................................................................... ;,,. 11 Task I Kick-off Meeting and Project Organization ..................................................... 11 Task 2 Preparation of Administrative Draft EIR .......................................................... 11 Task 3 Prepare Draft EIR ........................................................................................... 14 Task4 Prepare Final EIR ........................................................................................... 15 Task5 Meetings ......................................................................................................... 15 Task 6 Project Management ...................................................................................... 16 Assumptions and Limitations to the Scope of Work ....................................................... 16 Section E - Schedule ......................................................................................................... t7 Project Schedule ............................................................................................................ 17 Section F - Cost Proposal ............................................................... ; ................................. 18 Section G - References ..................................................................................................... 19 Section H - Authorization ............................................................................ r .................... 19 APPENDICES AppendixA Team Member Resumes Michael Brandman As$0c[etes H~Client~0018'~Proposals~0018P030-An nexation Supplemental EIR.dOC II Proposal [or Ci~y of Rancho Cucamonga Pre.Zone and North Eastern Sphere Annexation Supplemental General Plan EIR Introduction ECTIO ROD O NA INT : · · · - '~, -.L. · . :~-, ;' ~: U~ ' Project Understanding The City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) is seeking to prepare and process a Supplemental General Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) or other appropriate California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) document for the North Eastern Sphere Annexation Project. Unlike many EIR efforts, implementation of the proposed project will not result in specific development. In fact, it will annex this section of the City's sphere of influence, previously designated as Hillside Residential, and designated it Research Conservation. The annexation of the project area will coordinate future development while providing the continued conservation of open space and controlled development of developable properties. The update must include specific public participation oppommities, meet all legal requirements, and be user-friandly with the most current computer access processes and methods available. The project site is generally located north of the City boundary, between Haven Avenue and the City of Fontana border. It consists of an annexation of approximately 4,115 acres of land. The majority of the proposed annexation area is primarily designated as Flood Control and Public Utilities Land on the City's General Plan and the majority of the project area includes land that has been pre-zoned by the Etiwanda North Specific Plan (ENSP) as Flood Control (FC), Resource Conservation (RC), and Hillside Residential. The project includes amending some of the Hillside Residential pre-zone areas within the Etiwanda North Specific Plan to RC. The purpose of this re-zoning is due to the previous establishment of conservation habitat in areas pre-zoned for Hillside Residential in the Etiwanda North Specific Plan. In addition, approximately 680 acres of the proposed annexation area is located in tmincorporated San Bernardino County and has not been pre-zoned· The City proposes to pre-zone this area for Flood Control/Utility Corridor (390 acres), Open Space (268 acres), and Hillside Residential (21 acres). The proposed pre-zoning will not require a General Plan Amendment. However, the project will require an amendment to the City's Etiwanda North Specific Plan due to the proposed change in pre-zoning of Hillside Residential to Resource Conservation. Following the City's approval of the proposed project, a request will be submitted to the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) to annex the North Eastem Sphere Annexation project site into the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Major Issues Michael Brandman Associates' (MBA) staffrecently prepared EIRs for the City's General Plan Update and for two recent projects on the Etiwanda alluvial fan, Richland/Pinehurst Tentative Tract Map (TTM) 16072 and the Tracy ProjectFFTM 14749; both annexations into the City of Rancho Cucamunga. For those projects, major local issues included traffic, potential flooding, possible loss of open space, biological resources, and cultural resources. The annexation for this project proposes no increase in traffic. Based on completion of a Congestion Management Plan (CMP) Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) for the General Plan Update (GPU), MBA understands that San Bemardino Association of Govemmants (SANBAG) formally acknowledged that a new compliance TIA will not be required for future projects conforming with the updated General Plan. Assuming the new annexation conforms with the GPU, a CMP TIA would not be required. Similarly, we believe that the hydrology and drainage study prepared for the City's GPU Michael Brandman Associates H\Clie nt~0018~Proposals\0018P030-An nexatlon Supplemental EIR.doc Proposal for City of Rancho Cucamonga Pre-Zone and North Eastern Sphere Annexation Supplemental General Plan EIR Introduction also adequately addresses the needs of the subject project. A brief technical write-up will document this position and will be included in the EIR as Technical Appendices as part of the annexation and a plan of service. Fiscal impacts related to that action must be analyzed. It is our understanding that Stan Hoffman Associates is currently preparing a fiscal analysis and a Plan of Services. One area which will require specific environmental services concerns the update and clarification of endangered or sensitive habitat and/or species mapping as called out in the City's Request for Proposals (RFP). The project area supports alluvial fan sage scrub, considered a sensitive habitat and in need of protection by the California Department offish and Game (CDFG). The project area also may be home to two species of concern: the California gnateateher (CAGN) and the San Bernardino kangaroo rat (SBKR). MBA will conduct a field assessment for all known sensitive species. MBA has a long track record of legally successfully EIRs for potentially controversial projects, particularly those involving endangered species. To date, no E1R prepared by MBA has been successfully litigated. MBA is also familiar with the NEOSHPP program and the North Etiwanda Preserve. We have been pleased to have been chosen to perform a number of EIR projects in the City and are extremely familiar with the project area and City staffrequirements. Because of our corporate track record and local experience, MBA believes it is uniquely qualified to assist the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the preparation of this EIR. The MBA Approach Given that the proposed project includes pre-zoning land uses as well as amendments to existing pre- zoning land uses that are consistent or includes a less intense land use than the land uses that were evaluated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update EIR certified in 2001, no adverse environmental impacts beyond those that were evaluated in the General Plan Update EIR are expected to occur with project implementation. Therefore, MBA proposes to prepare a Supplemental, focused EIR that tiers offthe General Plan Update EIR. Such an EIR can be focused on those specific issues associated with the proposed project. A Supplemental EIR to the General Plan Update EIR appears to be the most appropriate because there are no substantial changes or findings from the previous General Plan Update EIR. Strategically, this is also a more defensible position against any legal challenge to the adequacy of the armexation's CEQA document. A well prepared Supplemental EIR would be used to clearly demonstrate that the project conforms to the previously prepared CEQA analysis and that a Supplemantal/Focused EIR is the most appropriate CEQA document. MBA's recent experience with LAFCO supports this approach. MBA's role will be to assist the City to prepare appropriate environmental documentation for the project. Our overall approach can be summarized as follows: · Confirm with the City's legal counsel and LAFCO that the appropriate CEQA document for the project is A Supplemental/Focused EIR to the GPU EIR; · Identify and evaluate technical issues, focusing on biological resources; · Prepare a thorough and logically organized written assessment of project impacts that will withstand public and agency scrutiny, as required by CEQA; · Work constructively with the City of Rancho Cucamonga to minir~ze environmental impacts while attaining project objectives; · Actively track the project schedule and budget and provide regular Status reports to the City; Michael Brandman Associates H'~Client~018~Proposals~0018P030-Annexatlon Supplemental EIR.doc 2 Proposal for City of Rancho Cucamonga Pre-Zone and North Eastern Sphere Annexation Supplemental General Plan EIR Introduction · Ensure quality control of all products through MBA's comprehensive review; · Serve as an extension of City staff to ensure that all City and CEQA procedural and notification requirements are met; and · Manage the project with 100% Inland Empire staff involvement under the direction of Principal and Regional Manager, Thomas J. McGill, Ph.D., and with the management of Inland Empire Director of Environmental Services, Kent Norton, AICP, in order to ensure the highest level of timeliness and the highest quality of effort. Michael Brendman Associates H~Cllent~0018~Proposal$~0018P030.Annexation Supplemental ElR.doc 3 Proposal for City of Rancho Cucamonga Pre-Zone and North Eastern Sphere Annexation Supplemental General Plan EIR Introduction SECTION B Relevant Project Experience MBA staff has been supporting the City of Rancho Cucamonga with environmental and biological support services for over 13 years, including preparation of the original Programmatic EIR for the Etiwanda North Specific Plan in 1992, the EIR for the 2001 General Plan Update, recently-completed EIRs for 359 single-family detached homes (TT 16072), the Tracy Project, and the 2003 Regulatory Compliance Services for the Milliken Road Extension Project. The following sample list of projects demonstrate the depth of our local experience and the direct applicability of our CEQA (including traffic and transportation, land use, geoteclmical/flooding, and biological issues) to this project, in_eluding several recent EIRs for proposed specific plans/housing tracts within San Bemardino County. We also have considerable experience with working with the LAFCO in providing CEQA documentation in support of several annexation efforts. Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update EIR The City of Rancho Cucamonga updated their General Plan and MBA simultaneously prepared the EIR. Dr. Thomas J. McGill managed the preparation of the environmental elements of the General Plan, assisted with public workshops and public hearings, and oversaw the preparation of the EIR for the implementation of the General Plan. Issues addressed in the EIR include flood hazards, fire hazards, traffic analysis, infrastructure development, archaeological and historic resources, and endangered species issues, including the Delhi Sands flower-loving fly (DSF), CAGN, and the SBKR. Regulatory Compliance Services for the Milliken Road Extension Project MBA provided regulatory compliance services for thc City of Rancho Cucamonga's Milliken Road Extension Project. The scope of work included the preparation of a Biological Assessment under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA), the formulation of a Conceptual Mitigation Plan, and the preparation of a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Section 404 Pre-Discharge Notification. Due to the presence of the critical habitat for the CAGN and SBKR, resource agency coordination included consultation with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service CUSWFS) under the ESA. Federal nexus for the consultation was established by USACE under Section 404 of the Federal Clean Water Act. Therefore, the consultation will proceed under Section 7 of the ESA through the USACE. City of gontana General Plan Update and EIR MBA is the lead consultant for the update of thc City's General Plan and EIR. The City and its Sphere of Influence (SOI) represent an area of over 52 square miles and 150,000 people. Rapid population growth has exceeded local road infrastructure capacity. Critical issues reviewed in the update were transportation networks, affordable housing, economic development, furore annexations, and community identity. An extensive public outreach program and opinion survey was part of the 2-year effort. The EIR will analyzed the future gri~wth patterns of the City and their potential effects upon issues including transportation, housing, air quality and public services. Other issues addressed in the EIR included seismic and geologic hazards, flood hazards, fire hazards, archaeological and historic resources, and endangered species issues, including the DSF, CAGN, and SBKR. Associates H[Client~0018~Proposars~0018P030-Annexation Supplemental EIR~doc 4 Proposal for City of Rancho Cucamonga Pre-Zone and North Eastern Sphere Annexation Supplemental General Plan EIR Introduction Initial Study/Environmental Assessment (IS/EA) and Focused Environmental Impact Report for Milliken Avenue Road Extension The Chaffey Joint Unified High School District required a road extension to serve a planned new high . school campus. Jointly planned with the County of San Bernardino and City of Rancho Cucamonga, the Milliken Avenue extension also included drainage improvements. MBA prepared an Initial Study/Environmental Assessment (IS/EA) for the project and its alternatives, including the no-build alternative and a different configuration of local roads. A focused E1R was subsequently prepared to further analyze potential impacts to biological resources, especially Riversidean alluvial sage scrub and CAGN. Biological Surveys along the San Sevaine Flood Control Channel MBA conducted a general biological survey and live-~apping effort for the federally listed endangered SBKR and Los Angeles pocket mouse (LAPM), a federal species of concern. The surveys were performed to verify the findings of surveys conducted in 1997 for this project. The studies were updated to identify potential biological constraints prior to project implementation. Following the general biological survey, a report was prepared assessing the current accuracy of the previous biological reports and describing any significant changes in biological resources at the sites. The report also described any changes in legal or management status of species in the area. permitted MBA biologists performed USFWS protocol surveys to determine presence/absence of SBKR and LAPM. No SBKR or LAPM were detected on the site. A breeding pair of burrowing owls, a State Species of Special Concern, was observed. EIR for a 359-Lot Subdivision of Single-Family Homes within Rancho Cucamonga's SOl (TT 16072) MBA provided environmental services as required by CEQA for an EIR for this project located on 150.79 acres north of Wilson Avenue and east of Etlwanda Avenue. The purpose of the proposed d. evelopment was to provide low-density to very low-density housing with up to 359 detached stogie-family housing units on minimum lot sizes of 8,400 square feet (approximately 2.38 dwelling units per acre). Open space and sensitive habitats (e.g., Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub and a variety of riparian systems) were prominent features in the development of the environmental and biological documentation. The resulting EIR was designed to be used by the City of Rancho Cucamonga for both this project and for the adoption of a development agreement and to support the annexation process with LAFCO. EIR for the 269-1ot Tracy Development Project (TT 14749) within Rancho Cucamonga's SOl MBA prepared a comprehensive project-level EIR for a low-density residential project on 169 acres of the North Etiwanda alluvial fan. The project initially began processing under the County of San Bemardino, and an EIR was prepared and recircuiated prior to certification to provide additional information on utilities and biological resources (i.e., alluvial fan sage scrub). The project was then proposed to be annexed into the City ofRencho Cucamonga. Major issues included compliance with e City s new hillside grading ordinance and guidelines, nearby earthquake faults, impacts to listed or otherwise sensitive plant and animal species as well as alluvial fan sage scrub, land exchange with County flood control, and equestrian park uses. Project is currently subject to legal action by the Spirit of the Sage Council. Michael Brandman H~CIJent\0018~Pmposals~0018P030-Ann exation Supplemental EIP,.doc Proposal for City of Rancho Cucamonga Pre-Zone and No~h Eastern Sphere Annexation Supplemental General Plan EIR Introduction EIR for Carrari Ranch MBA is preparing an EIR for 60.6 acres of a 381.2-acre property located in unincorporated San Bemardino County. The project will transform a vacant, unimproved site into a gated residential community consisting of 91 detached single-family, executive-level housing units to be constructed in one phase over a 2 to 6-year period. Proposed lot sizes will range from 9,000 to 45,000 square feet. The'remaining 327.3 acres of the property would remain as natural open space. The proposed project fits within the existing land use framework developed by the ENSP and as analyzed in the accompanying Programmatic EIR. Open space and sensitive habitats (e.g., Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub and a variety of riparian systems) remains significant and prominent features of the northwest Sphere area. The subsequent project-specific EIR being developed for this project may be used by the City of Rancho Cucamonga not only for approval of the project but also for the adoption ora development agreement and to support the annexation process with LAFCO. Etiwanda North Specific Plan EIR and Resource Management Plan The ENSP project is comprised of approximately 6,840 acres, of which approximately 1,155 acres arc outside of the City of Rancho Cucamonga's SO1. Approximately 1,100 acres of the Specific Plan area are privately held parcels within the San Bemardino National Forest. The project was designed to extend the historical, low-density, and neighborhood character of the original Etiwanda community of Rancho Cucamunga. The project will allow for the development of 3,613 dwelling units, 28 acres of neighborhood commercial development, public schools, and recreational features, as well as retaining 4,112 acres of the site in open space. Areas of conceru included biological resources, conversion of open spac~ to planned community uses, traffic and circulation, and compatibility with planned flood control facilities improvements. Rancho Cucamonga Industrial Area Specific Plan (IASP) Subarea 18 Specific Plan EIR An EIR and a Specific Plan were prepared for the development of Subarea 18 within the existing Rancho Cucamonga Industrial Area Specific Plan for the General Dynamics Corporation. The proposed Subarea Specific Plan provides adaptive commercial and industrial reuse of the three existing buildings onsite; a Metrolink station in the northeast coruer of the site; and recreational, commercial, and other multi-use facilities adjacent to a proposed golf course. AWARD-WINNING PROJECT ~ "The Preserve" Specific Plan EIR & Resource Management Plan This project consists of a Specific Plan; EIR; Supplemental Water Supply, Biological Resources and Transportation Analysis; and a Resource Management Plan. The Preserve Specific Plan is a response to unprecedented pressures for change in a pivotal 50-square mile location in western San Beraardino County. The lynchpin of the Plan is the racetrack-shaped Community Core that constitutes a totally new downtown and a rich mixture of commercial, multi-family residential and institutional uses. About half of the total acreage is devoted to some form of permanent open space, largely due to the eventual flooding potential created by raising nearby Prado Dam on the Santa Ana River. However, open space in many forms is an important theme of the Plan, such as the network of"Paseos" that run through its neighborhoods. Environmental challenges caused more detailed analysis of water, transportation and biology leading to development of a focused Resource Management Plan and partial re-circulation of the E1R. The Plan and integrated environmental documents provide a thorough management direction for the open space/habitat resources as well as the area to be developed. The Plan is transit friendly (a transit route and development standards accoramodate transit), manages the conflict between a major arterial highway that traverses the Community Core, and integrates well Michael Brendman Associates H[Clien~0018~Proposels[0018 P030-Annexation Supplemental ErR.doc proposal for City of Rancho Cucamonga Pre-Zone and North Eastern Sphere Annexation Supplemental General Plan EIR Introduction with the adjacent Chino Airport. The Plan was broadly supported by development, property owner, and environmental interests and was enthusiastically adopted by the Council. This project received the 2003 Outstanding Planning award from the American Planning Association. Michael Brandman Associates 7 H~Cltant\0018~ r oposa]s~00 't 8 P03(3*Annexation Supplemental EIR.dOC Proposal for City of Rancho Cucamonga Pre-Zone and North Eastern Sphere Annexation Supplemental General Plan F_IR Personnel PERSONNEL ' . t The MBA Project Team MBA is a professional services consulting firm serving the western United States from offices in San Bemardino, Irvine, Visalia, and San Ramon, California. MBA's staff of over 70 professionals specializes in environmental consulting services, including environmental planning and biological resources investigations. Since 1982, we have served government and transportation agencies, land developers, engineers, architects, industry, financial institutions, attorneys, and the military. MBA services include CEQA and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) documentation; biological studies, biological assessments, endangered species surveys, habitat restoration, wetlands delineation, regulatory permitting, archaeological and historic inventories, land use planning, water resources management, transportation planning, mitigation planning and monitoring, and construction monitoring. Realizing the importance and efficiencies of close coordination between an environmental consultant and client, MBA will manage your services from our San Bernardino Office. The San Bemardino Office is currently staffed by 13 dedicated and hard-working environmental professionals and is supported by a staff of over 55 technical and administrative personnel in our Irvine location. The proposed Program Manager and environmental task managers are located in our San Bemardino Office and, along with sub-consulted technical experts, will be the primary workforce for this con~xact. MBA understands the importance of contracting with an environmental funn that has a solid background and understanding of local environmental issues, federal and state environmental regulations, and is committed to partnering with its clients through the entire approval process. For over 20 years, MBA has been providing legally defensible environmental documents to public and private sector clients. We are proud to acknowledge that no MBA environmental document has ever been successfully challenged. The close proximity, immediate availability, and previous experience working in Rancho Cuenmonga will help in creating a parmership between the City and MBA resulting in a better understanding of project requirements and addressing specific environmental concerns. ~his level of committed coordination will help ensure on-time delivery of environmental documents that are compatible and internally consistent with the planning documents; the type of specifically focused environmental documents that concentrate on the critical issues needed to ensure efficiency and SUCCESS, Michael Brandman Associates 8 H~Client~0018~Pro;osa[s~0018P030-Annexation Supplemental EIR.dOC Proposal for City of Rancho Cucamonga Pre-Zone and North Eastern Sphere Annexation Supplemental General Plan EIR Personnel Senior Staff Principal-in-Charge Thomas J. MeGtil, Ph.D., a San Bemardino County native and resident, is a biologist with over 25 years experience in preparing environmental documentation and has extensive experience in negotiating with federal and state regulators. These regulators include USFWS, CDFG, USACE, State Water Quality Control Boards, State Air Pollution Control Districts, and Air Quality Management Districts. Dr. McGill has been an environmental consultant for over I0 years and provides the unique combination of being an environmental consultant as well as an attorney. Dr. McGill passed the California State Bar in 1990 and is an active member of the State Bar. He is the Regional Manager for MBA's Inland Empire Office and is a Principal in the finn with significant experience working in and around the City of Rancho Cucamonga. His approach to project management will emphasize continual coordination with the City, early issue identification and resolution, and on-time performance for all assigned tasks. Dr. McGill is also a recognized authority on alluvial fun plant communities and current conservation efforts, having recently authored a multi- species conservation plan in North Fontana and Rialto. Environmental Services Section Manager Kent Norton, AICP, REA, has 25 years of experience providing environmental consulting services and preparing environmental planning documents. His experience includes the preparation of documents that comply with CEQA and NEPA. He has managed the preparation of dozens of EIRs, Environmental Impact Statements, Initial Studies, and Environmental Assessments. One of his most recent projects involved preparing the Tmcy EIR for the City of Rancho Cucamonga as well as a Draft EIR and Recirculated EIR for the Tmcy Project when it was under the jurisdiction of the County of San Bemardino. Project Manager Christine Jacobs-Donoghue has more than 7 years of experience in natural resources and project management. Her primary focus has been CEQA compliance for potentially controversial projects. She has managed and authored environmental documents including EIRs, Initial Studies, environmental assessments, environmental t'mdings and responses to comments. Her experience in the legal realm (.paralegal with Best, Best & Krieger in Riverside) provides her with a unique perspective in understanding what is necessary to develop legally-defensible projects and environmental documents. She is currently the primary author and manager of environmental documents for the DARPA Grand Challenge, the Colton Metal Shredding Operation, and TT16361 in Redlands. Environmental Support Team George Wirtes, Assistant Project Manager, has experience creating environmental documents in accordance with the CEQA process (Initial Studies, Negative Declarations (NDs), Mitigated Negative Declarations (MNDs), and EIRs. He also performs biological site assessments to evaluate environmental constraints. He is currently engaged in research assessing post-fire disturbance impacts on Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub on a project site in Rancho Cueamonga. Mr. Wirtes has studied the effects of urban sprawl on the environment with coursework in wetland ecology and delineation, ornithology, climatology, and CEQA policy. He has completed a graduation project focused on the succession of chaparral vegetation during post-bum periods as it relates to species density. He is also proficient in Arcview and ArcGIS functionality as it pertains to Global Positioning System (GPS) data importing, thematic layer data analysis, and layout presentation. Michael Brandman Associates 9 H~Ciien t~0018',Proposals~0018 P030-Annexation Supplemental EIR.d~c Proposal for City of Rancho Cucamonga Pre-Zone and North Eastern Sphere Annexation Supplemental General Plan EIR Personnel Linda Archer has over 5 years of experience in the field of ecology. Her work has included restoration plan development, mitigation strategies development, plant community mapping, impacts analysis on sensitive biological resources, habitat suitability assessments, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) analysis, wildlife studies, and education. She is knowledgeable of the regulatory framework surrounding water resource permits, CEQA, and NEPA. Her field experience includes general and directed surveys for federally and state-listed plants, identification of locally important plant species, mitigation and cons/ruction monitoring, collection of data for field studies and for the development of restoration plans, oak tree assessments, wildfire and prescribed burn effects monitoring, invasive plant control, bird banding, and radio telemetry. She has developed curriculum for adult classes in natural history and conservation. Brand[nan Associates H~Client~0018~Proposals\0018P030.Anrtexation Supplomentar ErR.doc Proposal for City of Rancho Cucamonga Pre. Zone and North Eastern Sphere Annexation Supplemental General Plan EIR Study Methodology ECTION.'£)- STUDY METHOD- Gy, ', · ,.', ,]J The proposed scope of work has been organized into several major tasks. Refinements to the scope of work, budget, and project schedule will be discussed during the kick-offmeeting with City staff. Task 1 Kick-off Meeting and Project Organization Purpose: To establish early communications among the various p~'oject team members and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. This initial tusk will also be used to review and refine the proposed scope of work and agree on elements that will be included in the EIR, the EIR project description, and alternatives. · Attend kick-off meeting with the City and the MBA project team leaders to review the proposed scope of work, and to determine which elements will be included in the description of the project. · Receive complete project information and existing technical reports. MBA currently maintains much of this information and several pertinent reports in our library. · Refine the project schedule based on agreements reached during contract negotiations and the information discussed at the kick-offmeeting. · Receive all existing reference and research materials related to the project including site GIS maps, aerial photographs, plans, regional scientific studies, and recent local EIRs and other reports. Distribute, as appropriate, to project team members. · Conduct an in-house project team meeting to initiate work efforts of all team members. As part of this task, MBA will also fully discuss the project characteristics with City staff to assure that the Notice of Preparation (see Task 2) and the Draft EIR or other appropriate CEQA document. (see Task 4) accurately reflect the proposed actions, improvements, and objectives of the project. This will also assure that the technical studies (see Task 3) all analyze the same project in its entirety. Task 2 Preparation of Administrative Draft EIR Purpose: To prepare a comprehensive and legally defensible Focused EIR for the City of Rancho Cucamonga that is politically acceptable and minimizes adverse environmental consequences. Task 2.1 Prepare Project Description Based on information provided during the kickoffmeeting, prepare the Project Description section of the Supplimental EIR to include the following items: · Regional and local setting; · Project history and surrounding area; · Objectives of the project; · Project characteristics and important local resources; and Michael Brandman Associates H~Cllenfi0018~Proposals\0018P030-Annexation Supplemental EIR.dcc /// Proposal for City of Rancho Cucamonga Pre-Zone and North Eastern Sphere Annexation Supplemental General Plan EIR Study Methodology · Intended uses of the Supplemental EIR, including a list of responsible and other agencies expected to use the Supplemental, focused EIR in decision-making and a list of approvals for which the E1R will be used. Task 2.2 Conduct Environmental Analyses Specific environmental topics to be addressed, in addition ~o those for which a technical study will be prepared, are described below. Growth-inducing and cumulative impacts will be comprehensively evaluated separately in the Supplemental EIR. Each section will describe existing conditions, outline applicable significance thresholds, evaluate potential impacts of the project relative to those thresholds, recommend appropriate mitigation measures to reduce significant impacts, and clearly state the significance determination after mitigation. MBA will evaluate the following environmental issues in sequential sections of the Supplemental: Effects Found Not to be Significantly Different than Those in the C/O/'s Final EIR Based on MBA's f'mdings for the EIR drafied for the City's Final EIR project most of the CEQA- related environmental issues would not significantly change with the proposal annexation. Hence, most issues can be discussed in a focused Supplemental EIR using previous information provided in the City's Final EIR. The following issues will be briefly discussed in the Supplemental EIR to support the finding of not significantly different then those effects discussed in the Final EIR: · Soils and Geology · Air Quality · Noise Socioeconomics · Public Services and Utilities · Aesthetics and Visual Resources · Cultural Resources · Hazardous Materials Issues that Require Further Evaluation Those issues that will include an evaluation of fitrther analysis that are expected to have mitigation measures are as follows: Traffic Impact Analysis The City's RFP requests an updated or new TIA. Based on comparison of the CMP TIA prepared for the City's GPU, MBA has identified that a new CMP TIA is not required. If the land use zone proposed with this annexation conforms to the Updated General Plan, no changes in traffic are anticipated and a new CMP TIA would not be required. MBA will provide a qualitative discussion regarding changes in traffic conditions resulting from project implementation. Update and Clarify Endangered or Sensitive Habitat or Species Mapping Existing information including maps, aerial photographs, environmental documents, and correspondence relative to the site or proposed project will be reviewed and analyzed. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) topographic maps and aerial photos will be reviewed for evidence of USACE or CDFG jurisdictional areas pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and Section 1601 of the Fish and Game Code, respectively. Michael Brandman Associates 12 H~,Clie nt~O018~Proposais~,O01 BP030-Annexation Supplemental EIR.doc liZ. Proposal for City of Rancho Cucamonga Pm-Zone and North Eastern Sphere Annexation Supplemental General Plan EIR Study Methodology A focus of the information review will be on the known occurrences and habitats of special status species: CAGN, SBKR, golden eagles or other species that could occur in the area as well as an analysis of Critical Habitat within the area. Upon our initial review, portions of the site appear to fall within the Critical Habitat of both the SBKR and the CAGN. At least three blue-line streams are found onsite. These areas will be analyzed for their potential to fall under the jurisdiction of the USACE and/or CDFG. The site will be assessed for the potential to support a wildlife movement corridor. However, flood control activities over the years have changed many of the streams and they no longer qualify as jurisdictional. Following the review of existing information, the proposed project area will be systematically surveyed to characterize its biological resources, including habitat types and presence or absence of suitable habitat for sensitive species. The potential presence of any special status plant or animal or sensitive habitat will be mapped and documented using GPS. A vegetation/habitat map of the site will be created using GIS, which will document the naturally-occurring communities and possible habitats supporting listed and sensitive species. Additionally, the site will be assessed for the presence of wildlife corridors. Where appropriate, areas will be identified where additional surveys for potentially occurring sensitive habitat and/or species may be required in the future before allowing conforming land uses. Based upon the site survey, a comprehensive inventory of site flora and fauna will be compiled. These lists will be arranged taxonomically, will follow the most current published nomenclature, and will include species abundance, habitat information, and notation of native, introduced, or cultivated status. MBA will conduct a biological impact analysis for the proposed project. The analysis will identify potential impacts that would be associated with the development of a residential development, While maintaining large areas of open space. An explanation will be provided for issues that are not anticipated to result in significant impacts. If impacts are expected to be significant, explanations of potentially significant impacts and corresponding mitigation measures that would reduce these impacts to less than significant level will be provided. This will narrow and precisely define the scope of any subsequent environmental documentation, will provide a strategic action plan for completing the environmental process as efficiently as possible, and will determine the most effective approach for addressing the consultations and approvals of other agencies, if needed. MBA will prepare a draft Report documenting biological resources found onsite, potential constraints and/or opportunities associated with them, and suggested mitigation measures, including additional biological studies if these studies have not been previously prepared (e.g., focused biological inventories and/or formal wetlands delineation). This report will be sufficient to meet the requirements of CEQA and will be submitted as an appendix to the EIR. Hydrology and Drainage Study The City's RFP requests updated or new hydrology and drainage studies. MBA believes the existing information published in the City's GPU adequately address hydrology and drainage issues in the proposed project area and do not anticipate the need for any additional and/ur extensive studies. MBA will qualitatively discuss hydrology and drainage in the Supplemental EIR. Michael Brandman Associates H~Crie nfl0018'~Proposals~0018P030-Anr~exation Supplemental EIR.doc 13 Proposal for City of Rancho Cucamonga Pre.Zone and North Eastern Sphere Annexation Supplemental General Plan EIR Study Methodology Fiscal Impact Analysis The City's RFP requests updated or new Fiscal Impact Analysis. Based on recent discussions with the City, MBA understands that the City is going to perform these studies separate fi.om this proposal and, therefore, will not require these services as part of this proposal. MBA will incorporate the environmental issues associated with these studies into the Supplemental EIR. Other CEO~4-Mandated Sections MBA will be responsible for the preparation of the following: a. Table of Contents. b. Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitmant of Resources. c. List of Organizations and Persons Consulted. d. Prepares of the Environmental Document. e. References. f. Appendices. Task 3 Prepare Draft EIR MBA will coordinate with the City project coordinator who will assemble comments on, and suggest revisions to, the Administrative Dralt EIR, based on one unified set of comments to be provided to MBA by City staff. MBA will complete revisions to the Draft EIR pursuant to the City's review comments. Revisions will be prepared in conformance with the scope of work. MBA will then prepare and produce the Draft EIR for public distribution. MBA will transmit 15 copies of the Supplemental EIR to the State Clearinghouse for circulation to state agencies and 35 copies to the City For distribution to local agencies and City departments. Assign a project team with experience on similar projects, and coordinate with task managers to ensure staffing availability. MBA will assign only Inland Empire staff to this project. · Review all work to be performed, and ensure that significant impacts on external agencies are identified. · Assure that applicable City, County, and State standards, policies, und procedures are jointly understood by all project team members. · Assure timely delivery of project documents. · Review project status with the City at regular project intervals. · Identify any potential conflicts due to possible changes in scope. · Review performance with the City's Project Manager to make any adjustments required for successful project completion and determine improvements for future projects. Michael Brandman Associates 14 H~Client"O 018gOroposals\0018P030-Ann exat Jon Supplemental EIR.doc Proposal for City of Rancho Cucamonga Pm.Zone and North Eastern Sphere Annexation Supplemental General Plan EIR Study Methodology Task 4 Prepare Final EIR Purpose: To respond to comments on the Final EIR, prepare the Mitigation Monitoring Program, Findings, and Statemqnt of Overriding Considerations (tf necessary), publish the Final EIR after certification by City Council, and prepare the Notice of Determination. Task 4.1 Prepare Response to Comments MBA will meet with City staff to review comments on Draft EIR, then prepare drat~ responses to comments received on the Draft EIR. Responses that are within this proposal's scope of work and budget consists of explanation, elaboration, or clarification of the data contained in the Drat~ EIR with a budgeted effort of up to 24 hours for technical staff in this task. MBA will submit draft responses to City staff for review and comment; and then finalize responses to comments for City use in public hearings. Task 4.2 Prepare Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) Prior to Planning Commission hearings on the project and Draft EIR, MBA will prepare the MIVIRP to assist the City in implementing mitigation measures. MBA will utilize the City's most current format and detail the schedule and responsibilities for implementing each mitigation measure. Task 4.3 Prepare Administrative Final Addendum to the Final Elk MBA will prepare Findings and Statement of OvenSding Considerations (if necessary); and prepare and produce the Administrative Final EIR that includes Responses to Comments and the MMRP for City review and commtnt. Task 4.4 Draft Facts, Findings, and Statement of Overriding Considerations (if necessary) Prior to City action on the project and Addendum, MBA will prepare draft findings and, if needed, a Statement of Overriding Consideration; and provide Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations to the City for finalization. Task 4.5 Final Elk and Notice of Determination MBA will prepare and provide 50 copies of the Final EIR including the Response to Comments, and MMRP, based on City comments. MBA will also prepare the Notice of Determination. Task 5 Meetings Purpose: To provide support to City staff during the preparation of the environmental documents and at Planning Commission and City Council hearings. · Attend project kick-offmeeting and four other meetings with staff. · Attend one neighborhood/public seeping meeting. · Attend up to four consultation or other project-related meetings (e.g., USFWS, CDFG, etc.). · Attend up to two Planning Commission meetings and two City Council meetings. This task does not include preparing agendas, public notices, mailing lists, postage, or related activities for these meetings Products: Agendas and minutes from meetings with wildlife agencies, Planning Commission, City Council, and City staff Michael Brandman Associates 15 H\Client~0018~Proposals\0018P030-Annexatron Supplemental ErR.doc /15 Proposal for City of Rancho Cucamonga Pre-Zone and North Eastern Sphere Annexation Supplemental General Plan EIR Study Methodology. Task 6 Project Management Purpose: To provide for the management of the preparation of the EIR, ensure that the project is delivered on time and within budget, and ensure that the City is kept aware of the project status. · Communicate routinely with project team members and the City for issue resolution and progress reporting. · Written or electronic (i.e., e-mail) progress reports, submitted monthly, describing project progress and identifying issues needing resolution. · Project schedule updates as changes occur. Products: Monthly Progress Reports Updates to project schedule (if or as needed) Assumptions and Limitations to the Scope of Work Assumptions · MBA assumes that the City will provide access to all relevant reports or information. · MBA will reproduce a copy of such material for its own use in preparing the environmental documentation. · MBA will respond to one round of comments on each document or other deliverable described in the Scope of Work. · MBA will provide the number of copies of each document as listed in the Scope of Work. Additional copies, if necessary, will be provided at the City's expense. Limitations · Significant changes to the project description will require addenda to the EIR technical report if not covered under the Scope of Work. Michael Brandman Assoc;a;== HXClienfi0018~Proposars~0018P030-Annexation Supplemental ElR.doc '/6 //?,, Proposal for City of Rancho Cucamonga Pre-Zone and North Eastern Sphere Annexation Supplemental General Plan EIR Sch ,,~ ~CTION E SCHEDULE ' ' ~ ..... ' " Project Schedule Following is an overview of the proposed schedule for the preparation of the proposed annexation project. The schedule is based on a contract award date of August 5, 2005. Milestone Completion No,ce of Award/Contract Approval August 5, 2005 Project Kick-OffMeeting August 12, 2005 Receive Fiscal Impact Analysis and Plan of Services Reports August 19, 2005 Submit Administrative Dralt EIR to City October 7, 2005 Receive Comments from City on Draft EIR October 19, 2005 Submit "Proof Check" Draft EIR to City October 28, 2005 Start circulation of Draft EIR for public review November 2, 2005 Circulation of Draft EIR complete (45 days) December 19, 2005 Prepare Responses to Comments/Final EIR. Janua~ 10, 2006 Prepare Mitigation Monitoring Plan and Findings January 10, 2006 Planning Commission and City Council Hearings January / February 2006 This schedule assumes 12 days for City staff'review of the Final ErR Michael Brandman Associates H~Client[OO18~ProposalslO01SPO30~Annoxation Supplemental EIR.doc 17 //7 Proposal for City of Rancho Cucamonga Pre-Zone and North Eastern Sphere Annexation Supplemental General Plan EIR Cost tSECTION F- COST PROPOSAL · ~ ': ~ ~l MBA will complete the above scope of work for $64,500. The following is a summary breakdown of the professional labor fees for each task and associated direct costs for the proposed EIR project. Task/Professional Fees 1. Project Initiation $ 3,000 2. Administrative Draft EIR 30,000 3. Draft EIR 8,500 4. Administrative Final and Final EIR (RTC and MMRP) 5,000 5. Meetings and Public Hearings 5,000 6. Project Management 5,000 Total Professional Fees $56,500 Direct Costs (reproduction, postage, etc.) $ 8,000 TOTAL FEES $64,500 Michael Brat;~.i&. Associates H\Client\0018~Proposals\0018P030-Annexation Supplemental ElR.doc ~8 Proposal for City of Rancho Cucamonga Pre-Zone and North Eastern Sphere Annexation Supplemental General Plan EIR References and Authorization [~E'~cTION G- REFERENCES' MBA is pleased to provide the following local references: Client: City of Chino Planning Department Contact: Chuck Coe, (909) 591-9811 Planning Director Client: County of San Bemardino Land Use Services Department Contact: Randy Scott,(909) 3874147 Division chief, Advance Planning CHent: City of Fontana Planning Division Contact: Debbie Brazill, (909) 350-6727 Deputy Community Development Director Client: City of Rialto Planning Department Contact: Mike Story, (909) 421-7205 Director of Development Services ~N" AUTH _R H-~ 0 IZATION ~ ~ ,',' ~ MBA hereby certifies that this proposal has been reviewed and signed by an official authorized to contractually bind the firm. MBA further certifies that this proposal will be valid for ninety (90) days from the date shown on the cover letter. Michael Brandman Associates 19 H~Client'~ 018'~Pmposals'~0018P 030-An nexation Supplemental EIR,doc Appendix A Team Member Resumes' THE C I T Y OF i~ANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE: March 16, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Larry Henderson AICP, Principal Planner SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION TO APPROPRIATE $76,000 OUT OF AB1600 RESERVES INTO ACCOUNT NUMBER 1016301-5300 (CONTRACT SERVICES) IN CONNECTION WITH CITY/COUNTY INITIATED ANNEXATION DRC2004-01204. RECOMMENDATION: Authorize staff to appropriate $76,000 out of AB1600 reserves into account number 1016301-5300 to provide funding for costs associated with a proposed annexation of approximately 4,115 acres, as directed by City Council on January 5, 2005. BACKGROUND: On January 5, 2005 the City Council, at the County of San Bernardino's request, authorized staff to proceed with Annexation DRC2004-01204. A copy of the previous Staff Report is attached for reference. A working budget of $76,000 has been identified as the total needed to complete all required studies, documents, and LAFCO Fees. As individual components of the Annexation are worked out Staff will return to the City Council with updates and contract approvals. Respectfully submitted, City Planner Attachment: January 5, 2005 City Council 'Staff Report ~t¢ % THE CITY OF ]~ANC~{ 0 C{ICAMONGA DATE: January 5, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Larry Henderson, AICP, Principal Planner SUB,~ECT: REQUEST TO DIRECT STAFF TO INITIATE ANNEXATION DRC2004 - 01204 AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT (PRE-ZONE) DRC2004 - 01208 -A proposed annexation of approximately 4,115 acres of land, generally located north of the City boundary, between Haven Avenue and the City of Fontana border - This annexation area is also referred to as the North Eastern SPhere Annexation. APN: 0201-032-09, 50, 73, 78 thru 79, and 82 thru 85; 0201-281-02, 04 thru 10, 13 thru 14, and 16 thru'22; 0225-051-01, 04, 07, 15,17 thru 20, 22 thru 34, and 36 thru 37; 0225-061-02, 05 thru 06, 08 thru 11, 15 thru 17, 21 thru 22, .25 thru 30, and 33; 0225-071-01 thru 16 and 20; 0225-091-05 and 06; 0225-09-106; 0225-092-01; 0226-061-03, 07, 16, 20, 26 thru 28, 33, 47 thru 48, 56 thru 57, and 61 thru 74;. 0226-082-08 and 19 thru 30 and a request to change the district map to pre-zone land within the City Sphere of Influence to Flood Control/Utility Corridor (390 acres), Open Space (268 acres), and Hillside Residential (21 acres) for a total of approximately 680 acres of' land, and in conformance with the existing General Plan, generally located north of the City limits between Haven Avenue and extending approximately 6,430 feet easterly, APN: 0201-032-09, 73, 78 thru 79, and 82 thru 83; 0201-031-02, 04 thru 10, 13 thru 14, and 16 thru 22; and 0225-051-01 and 22 thru 23, RECOMMENDATION: Direct staff by minute action to take all steps necessary to process the annexation of the previously described portion of the Rancho Cucamonga Sphere of Influence. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: On November 9, 2004, the San Bemardino County Board of supervisors passed Resolution No. 2004-367 supporting the City's annexation of approximately 4,115 acres of land generally located north of the City boundary, between Haven Avenue and the City of Fontana border. A copy of the referenced County Resolution is attached as Exhibit "A". The County of San Bemardino is the majodty property owner for the annexation area through the County Flood Control District and other Special Districts as well as the County itself and, therefore, it is appropriate to act on their request. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2004-01204AND DR02004-01208 - CITY OFRANCHO CUCAMONGA January5,2005 Page 2 The annexation of this area would unite public services and should improve emergency response, eliminate confusing law enforcement jurisdictional boundaries and give the control of land use issues, such as circulation, to the City. The area to be annexed and the portion requiring a pre-zone is shown on the map attached. CONCLUSION: The annexation of this area is in conformance with the General Plan policies of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and will provide for the continued conservation of open space and controlled development of private developable properties. Respectfully submitted, City Planner BB:LH~ma Attachments: Exhibit "A" - County Resolution No. 2004-367 Exhibit "B" - Map of Annex and Pre-Zone Area RESOLUTION NO. 2004-367 A RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT BY THE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AND ACTING AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT AND ACTING AS THE GOVERNING BODY FOR COUNTY SERVICE AREA 70, IMPROVEMENT ZONE OS1 SUPPORTING THE APPLICATION BY THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TO THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION FOR THE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY, AS MORE SPECIFICALLY DESCRIBED BELOW On Tuesday, November 9, 2004, on motion by Supervisor Young~ duly seconded by Supervisor Biane, and carried, the following resolution is adopted by the Board of Supervisors of San Bemardino County, State of California. BE IT RESOLVED, by the San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors (hereinafter 'Board), and acting as the governing body of the San Bernardino County Flood Control District and acting as the governing body for County Service Area 70, Improvement Zone OS1, that: WHEREAS, the Board supports the City of Rancho Cucamonga's (hereinafter City) desires to initiate proceedings pursuant to the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000, commencing with Section 56000 of the California Government Code, for the annexation of territory to the City and the West Valley Vector Control District; and WHEREAS, the majodty of the land within the proposed annexation as described by the City is under the control of the Board as vested in the San Bemardino County Flood Control District, County Service Area 70, Improvement Zone OS1, or the County; and WHEREAS, the territory proposed for annexation by the City is legally uninhabited and a description of the boundaries of the action is set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, and WHEREAS, the reason for the proposed annexation is to include the territory of the City's assigned sphere of influence within the corporate boundaries of the City so that an increased level of law enforcement can be provided to the area, and to provide the full range of the City's municipal services only to those areas designed for urban development. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this ~'esolution of support conveying the County's consent to the annexation of its lands for the proposed reorganization as described in Exhibit "A', in the manner provided by Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000, is hereby approved and adopted by the Board. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Clerk of the Board and acting as the Clerk of the San Bernardino County Flood Control District and acting as the Clerk of the County Service Area 70, Improvement Zone OS1 is hereby authorized and directed to transmit to the City Manager of the City and the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission certified copies of this Resolution. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Supervisors of San Bernardino County, State of California, as the governing body of the San Bernardino County Flood Control District and governing body of the County Service Area 70, Improvement Zone O51, by the following vote: AYES: SUPERVISORS: Young, Biane, Postmus, Aguiar and Hansberger NOES: SUPERVISORS: None ABSENT: SUPERVISORS: None STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) SS. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) I, J. RENEI~ BASTIAN, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of'San Bernardino, State of California, hereby certify the foregoing to be a full, true and correct copy of the record of the action taken by the Board of Supervisors, by vote of the members present, as the same appears in the Official Minutes of said Board at its meeting of November 9, 2004. jrh Item # 25. J. REN~. EXHIBIT "A" Those portions of land lying within Sections 13 and 14, Township 1 Horth. Range 7 West, San Bemardino Meridian, described as follov~: All of said Section 13, That pod'ion of said Section 14 lying within that parcel of land des~,:r~bed in document recorded in Book 9616, page 1793, Official Records of .~a.q Bemardlno County. TOGETHER WITH; Those portions of land lying withln Sections 15, i 6, 17 18, 19, ;3 an,~l ~::), Township 1 North, Range 6 west, San Bernardino Meridian, clescri~ed a.~ follow~: All of said Sections 15, 16, 17 and 19. All of said Section 18. EXCEPTING THEREF:I~OM any portion thereof lying within the West ? al! of the Northwest quarter of said Section 18. The East half of the East half of said Section 22, and that portion o' the East half of the West half and of the West half of the East half c.f sc~id Section 22. lying within that parcel of land described as Parc.'el 1, recorded in Book 8171, page 84, Official Records of San Be'nardl ~o Count. The North half of said Section 30. EXCEPTING THE~EFI~OM any portion of said Section 30, lying wlfhln or Southerty of that parcel of land described in document recorced September 13, 2000, as Instrument Number 2000-O,~3~281, Official Records of said County. Containing 3,830 acres, more or less. 4000, 0 4000 8000 12000, Feet ~;~! NORTH EASTERN SPHERE ANNEXATION -ZONE DESIGNATION ~ FLOOD CONTROL / UTILITY CORRIDOR ~ HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL ~ OPEN SPACE ANNEXATION DRC2004-01204 DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT EXHIBIT "B" AMENDMENT(PRE-ZONE) DRC2004-01208 - r~ A N C H O C U C A M O N G ^ ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Staff Report DATE: August 17, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Tasha Hunter, Public Service Tech I SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR TRACT 16113, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF WILSON AND EAST AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY TRIMARK PACIFIC RANCHO CUCAMONGA, LLC RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSI,~ Improvement Agreement and Improvement Secudty to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract 16113 were approved by the City Council on July 21,2004, in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $2,433,600.00 Labor and Material Bond: $1,216,800.00 Monumentation Cash Deposit $ 3,550.00 The construction process has been delayed and the public improvements will not be completed per the Improvement Agreement. The developer, Trimark Pacific Rancho Cucamonga, LLC, is requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's office. Respectively submitted, Willi~ J. O Neil City Engineer WJO:TCH Attachments lZ r Trimark Pacific Homes, L.E City of Rancho Cucamonga 7-28-05 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91729 Attn: Engineering Dept. Dear Sir/Madame: Please use this letter as a request to extend our improvement agreements for Tract 16113. Our construction process has been delayed, but we are currently working. We are requesting that the agreements be extended another year. Thank you for your understanding in this matter, tf you have any further questions please contact the project manager Pat Maher at (951) 369-1071. Sincerely, Trimark Pacific Homes, /'J Jennifer Kolar Sr. Project Coordinator 3400 Central Avenue, Suite 145, Riverside, California 92506 909.369.1071 FAX 909.369.9196 WILSON AV~'NU~' - 24TH ST. L OCA TION VIC/HI FY MA P t VICINITY MAP RESO,UT,ON 05- z/i A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 16113 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on August 17, 2005, by Trimark Pacific Rancho Cucamonga, LLC, as developer, for the improvement of public right- of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the southwest corner of Wilson and East Avenue; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Tract 16113; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, 'THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPART~IENT S ffR rt DATE: August 17, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FR(A~: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Tasha Hunter, Public Service Tech I SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR TRACT 16430, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE BETVVEEN WILSON AVENUE AND HILLSIDE ROAD, SUBMITTED BY ARCHIBALD VENTURES, LLC RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. .BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS !mprovement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public ~mprovements for Tract 16430 were approved by the City Council on July 21, 2004 in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $913,900.00 Labor and Material Bond: $456,950.00 Due to unexpected processing delays and construction setbacks that caused the project to exceed the intended building schedule. The developer, Archibald Ventures, LLC, is requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's office. Respectively submitted, Williafn J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:TCH Attachments MANNING August 3, 2005 Ms. Tasha Hunter Community Development Department Engineering Division The City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91729 Re: Improvement Agreement Extension for TR 16430 Dear Ms. Hunte~;: We would like request an extension of the Improvement Agreement for the above referenced tract. We had unexpected processing delays and construction setbacks that caused our project to exceed our intended building schedule. Thank you for your cooperatior~ in this matter. Sincerjily, Cra~ Project Manager ' ' ' " , 153 Vicinity Map City of Rancho Cucamonga TRACT 16430 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 16430 WHEREAS, the City Counc of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on August 17, ;;005, by Archibald Ventures, LLC, as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the west side of Archibald Avenue between Wilson Avenue and Hillside Road; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Tract 16430; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A E~ N O J N E E R I N G D E P A R T M E N T Staff:Report DATE: August 17, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Tasha Hunter, Public Service Tech I SUBJECT: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND, ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE CASH DEPOSIT AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2002-00884, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 6TH STREET, EAST OF UTICA AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY F & F SIMON RANCHO TECH, LLC RECOMMENDATION: The required improvements for DRC2002-00884 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond and accept a Maintenance Cash Deposit. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: As a condition of approval of completion of DRC2002-00884, located on the south side of 6th Street, east of Utica Avenue, the applicant was required to complete street improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City Council release the existing Faithful Performance Bond and accept the Maintenance Bond. Developer: F & F Simon Rancho Tech, LLC Release: Faithful Performance Bond 8166319 $37,300.00 (Bond No.) Accept: Maintenance Cash Deposit CR075325 $3,730.00 (Receipt No.) Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:TCH Attachment(s) PROJ£C RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: ENGINEERING DIVISION RESOLUTION NO. ~) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2002-00884 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for DRC2002-00884 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. [~ A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ~NGINE~DINC DEPAI~TMENT DATE: August 17, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Tasha Hunter, Public Svc. Tech I SUBJECT: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND FOR TRACT 14497, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF BLUEGRASS AVENUE, SOUTH OF WILSON AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY STANDARD PACIFIC CORPORATION RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond, for Tract 14497, located on the west side of Bluegrass Avenue, south of Wilson Avenue, submitted by Standard Pacific Corporation _BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The required one-year maintenance period has ended, and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. DEVELOPER Standard Pacific Corporation 255 E. Rincon St., Ste. #200 Corona, Ca 92879-1330 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond #11133621513-M $84,860.00 Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:tch Attachment CITY OF NO~U ~ ~S ~CHO CUCAMONGA ~TEM: Tract [q~ 7 . IITLE: Rancho Etiwanda [~ A N H O C U C A M O N G A E N O I N E E RI N G D EPA R TM E N T -'---1 Staff:Report DATE: August 17, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O Nell, C'ty Engineer BY: Tasha Hunter, Public Service Tech I SUBJECT: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND, ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 16157, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF CHURCH STREET AND TERRA VISTA PARKWAY, SUBMITTED BY CONCOURS DEVELOPMENT CO., LLC & LDC COUGAR LLC RECOMMENDATION: The required improvements for Tract 16157 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond and accept a Maintenance Bond. BACKGROUND/ANALYSiS: As a condition of approval of completion of Tract 16157, located at the northwest corner of Church Street and Terra Vista Parkway, the applicant was required to complete street improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City Council release the existing Faithful Performance Bend and accept the Maintenance Bond. Developer: Concours Development Co., LLC & LDC Cougar LLC Release: Faithful Performance Bond 836811S $237,000.00 (Bond No.) Accept: Maintenance Bond 836811S $ 23,700.00 (Bond No.) Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:TCH Attachment(s) I 11· ~,~ FOI~ CONDOMINIUM PUHPOSES ~ITE UTILIZATION MAP TENTATIVE TP, ACT NO. 16157 [~@ TERRA VISTA ~. RANCHO CUCAMOMGA, CA ~ '~ ~-62 (SU-I RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 16157 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 16157 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. R A N C h O C U C A M O N G A E N g I N E E R I N O D EPA R T M E N T ~ Staff Report DATE: August 17,2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O Nell, C'ty Engineer BY: Tasha Hunter, Public Service Tech I SUBJECT: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 16370 TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONSTRUCTION, LOCATED AT CHURCH STREET AND ARBOR LANE, SUBMITTED BY STANDARD PACIFIC / VICTORIA ARBORS, LLC RECOMMENDATION: The required improvements for Tract 16370 Traffic Signal Construction have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: As a condition of approval of completion of Tract 16370 Traffic Signal Construction, at Church Street and Arbor Lane, the applicant was required to complete street improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City Council release the existing Faithful Performance Bond and file a Notice of CompJetion. Developer: Standard Pacific / Victoria Arbors, LLC Release: Faithful Performance Bond #08742608 $115,000.00 (Bond No.) Respectfully submitted, William J. O'NeJJ City Engineer WJO:TCH Attachment(s) TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. ?~?~.~- ~-'-_~---- "~'~~ TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 16370 V. ICTORIA ARBORs RESOLUTION NO. ~,.~o A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 16370 TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONSTRUCTION AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 16370 Traffic Signal Construction have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. ORDINANCE NO. 747 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL FO THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING ITS ORDINANCE NO. 728 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, -CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: '1. Ordinance No. 728 of this Council hereby are repealed. 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. THE CITY OF I~AN CI~ 0 CUCAMONGA DATE: August 1~, 2005 TO: Mayor and Membem of the Ci~ Council Jack Lam, AICP, Ci~ Manager FROM: Brad Buller, Ci~ Planner BY: · Lar~ Hendemon, AICP, Principal Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2003-011~ - CI~ OF ~NCHO CUCAMONGA - A r~uest to amend Se~ion 17.16.030 use regulations to allow public storage facilities, including outdoor RV parking, in the Utili~ Corridor Distri~. Related Files: Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-01130 and Prelimina~ Review DRC2002-007~. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impa~s for consideration. MEMO~NDUM OF UNDERSTANDING DRC2005-00078 - CI~ OF ~NCHO CUCAMONGNSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON - A Memorandum of Understanding for the use of Southern California Edison Utili~ Corridom for recreational trail use and some commemial/industrial uses in the selected areas as allowed by the General Plan. RECOMMENDATION: Approve Development Code Amendment DRC2003-01144 by adoption of the attached Ordinance and, by Minute action, authorize the Mayor to sign the Memorandum of (MOA) Understanding for the City. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Development Code Amendment DRC2003-01144: This amendment would amend the Development Code to allow, subject to a conditional use permit, public storage facilities, including outdoor RV parking in the Utility Corridor District. This amendment is similar to the regulations that already exist for other locations in the Industrial zoned areas that are designated OS (Open Space) on which Utility Power lines are located. The City has found that these types of uses are beneficial and reasonably compatible with adjacent uses including residential. Related Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-01130 (for a public storage facility on 5.38 acres in the Utility Corridor District, along with outdoor RV parking, six storage buildings totaling 71,175 square feet, and a management office of approximately 1,430 square feet, located on the north side of Base Line Road, east of Day Creek Flood Control Channel within CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DCA DRC2003-01144AND MOA DRC2005-00078 Augu~ 15,2005 Page 2 the SCE power line corridor) was approved by the Planning Commission on April 13, 2005, subject to the City Council approval of the required Development Code Amendment DRC2003-01144. There was some neighborhood concern with the public storage facility at the April 13, 2005, Planning Commission hearing (Exhibit B), and although there was no appeal filed, the applicant (Southern California Edison Company) requested that the Development Code Amendment be delayed in order for them to contact the concerned residents. It is the applicant's request to proceed with the amendment and they expressed that desire in a letter to Planning staff dated June 14, 2005 (Exhibit C). Memorandum of Understanding DRC2005-00078: The City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) and Southern California Edison (SCE) for several years have been engaged in discussions regarding the desire of SCE to develop right-of-ways under ownership or jurisdiction of SCE located within the corporate limits of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In addition, the City has planned for the use of portions of the SCE right-of-ways as community trails, parks, and/or ancillary recreation related uses through the adopted General Plan. As a result, SCE and the City have developed the attached City of Rancho Cucamonga - SCE Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) of SCE's right-of-ways dated January 26, 2005, (Exhibit A) which depicts SCE's right-of-ways and the land uses which the City and SCE desire to develop and use on said right-of-ways. Each of the proposed land uses depicted on the Master Plan, however, are subject to review and approval actions including, but not limited to, general plan amendments, zone changes, conditional use permits, development review permits, parcel maps, and building and fire plan checks, depending upon the nature of the proposed land use and its location in the City. The City and SCE recognize that should the SCE right-of-ways be developed according to the land use depicted on the Master Plan, the development must occur in an organized manner, and the projects must be consistent with the City's General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and all other applicable regulations and policies. Implementation of the City's Master Plan of Trails as depicted on the Master Plan attached for reference are, in general, conceptually appropriate for use within the portions of SCE right-of-ways where each use is proposed. Trails Advisory Committee: On February 9, 2005, the Trails Advisory Committee reviewed and recommended approval of the SCE Memorandum of Understanding DRC2005-00078 as presented. Parks and Recreation Commission: On February 17, 2005, the Parks and Recreation Commission reviewed and recommended approval of the SCE Memorandum of UnderStanding DRC2005-00078 as presented. Planning Commission: Reviewed apl the Applications on April 13, 2005, and approved or recommended approval as applicable. City Council: This project was reviewed by the City Council on July 20, 2005 and was subsequently continued for further study. Staff will present an oral report detailing any new information and/or study results on the project proposal during the meeting. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DCA DRC2003-01144 AND MOA DRC2005-00078 August 15, 2005 Page 3 CONCLUSION: Staff finds the proposed changes in the Development Code for the subject application to be appropriate and an effective means for implementing the goals and objectives of the General Plan. Proposed Memorandum of Understanding DRC2005-00078 will encourage orderly development of the sites which will be consistent with the similar type development throughout the City, and will assure the long term recreation trail use of appropriate areas. City Planner BB:LH\Is Attachments: Exhibit A - City Council Staff report dated July 20, 2005 City Council Ordinance for Development Code Amendment DRC2003-01144 THE CITY OF L. j i~ANCHO CIJCAMONGA DATE: July 20, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Larry Henderson, AICP, Principal Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2003-01144 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend Section 17.16.030 use regulations to allow public storage facilities, including outdoor RV parking, in the Utility Corridor District. Related Files: Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-01130 and Preliminary Review DRC2002-00704. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING DRC2005-00078 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGNSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON A Memorandum of Understanding for the use of Southern California Edison Utility Corridors for recreational trail use and some commercial/industrial uses in the selected areas as allowed by the General Plan. RECOMMENDATION: Approve Development Code Amendment DRC2003-01144 by adoption of the attached Ordinance and, by Minute action, authorize the Mayor to sign the Memorandum of (MOA) Understanding for the City. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Development Code Amendment DRC2003-01144: This amendment would amend the Development Code to allow, subject to a conditional use permit, public storage facilities, including outdoor RV parking in the Utility Corridor District. This amendment is similar to the regulations that already exist for other locations in the Industrial zoned areas that are designated OS (Open Space) on which Utility Power lines are located. The City has found that these types of uses are beneficial and reasonably compatible with adjacent uses including residential. Related Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-01130 (for a public storage facility on 5.38 acres in the Utility Corridor District, along with outdoor RV parking, six storage buildings totaling 71,175 square feet, and a management office of approximately 1,430 square feet, located on the north side of Base Line Road, east of Day Creek Flood Control Channel within i$'l CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DCA DRC2003-01144 AND MOA DRC2005-00078 July 20, 2005 Page 2 the SCE power line corridor) was approved by the Planning Commission on April 13, 2005, subject to the City Council approval of the required Development Code Amendment DRC2003-01144. There was some neighborhood concern with the public storage facility at the Apdl 13, 2005, Planning Commission hearing (Exhibit B), and although there was no appeal filed, the applicant (Southern California Edison Company) requested that the Development Code Amendment be delayed in order for them to contact the concerned residents. It is the applicant's request to proceed with the amendment and they expressed that desire in a letter to Planning staff dated June 14, 2005 (Exhibit C). Memorandum of Understandinq DRC2005-00078: The City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) and Southern California Edison (SCE) for several years have been engaged in discussions regarding the desire of SCE to develop right-of-ways under ownership or jurisdiction of SCE located within the corporate limits of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In addition, the City has planned for the use of portions of the SCE right-of-ways as community 'trails, parks, and/or ancillary recreation related uses through the adopted General Plan. As a result, SCE and the City have developed the attached City of Rancho Cucamonga - SCE Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) of SCE's right-of-ways dated January 26, 2005, (Exhibit A) which depicts SCE's right-of-ways and the land uses which the City and SCE desire to develop and use on said right-of-ways. Each of the proposed land uses depicted on the Master Plan, however, are subject to review and approval actions including, but not limited to, general plan amendments, zone changes, conditional use permits, development review permits, parcel maps, and building and fire plan checks, depending upon the nature of the proposed land use and its location in the City. The City and SCE recognize that should the SCE right-of-ways be developed according to the land use depicted on the Master Plan, the development must occur in an organized manner, and the projects must be consistent with the City's General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and all other applicable regulations and policies. Implementation of the City's Master Plan of Trails as depicted on the Master Plan attached for reference are, in general, conceptually appropriate for use within the portions of SCE right-of-ways where each use is proposed. Trails Advisory Committee: On February 9, 2005, the Trails Advisory Committee reviewed and recommended approval of the SCE Memorandum of Understanding DRC2005-00078 as presented. Parks and Recreation Commission: On February 17, 2005, the Parks and Recreation Commission reviewed and recommended approval of the SCE Memorandum of Understanding DRC2005-00078 as presented. Planning Commission: Reviewed all the Applications on April 13, 2005, and approved or recommended approval as applicable. CiTY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DCA DRC2003-01144 AND MOA DRC2005-00078 July 20, 2005 Page 3 CONCLUSION: Staff finds the proposed changes in the Development Code for the subject application to be appropriate and an effective means for implementing the goals and objectives of the General Plan. Proposed Memorandum of Understanding DRC2005-00078 will encourage orderly development of the sites which will be consistent with the similar type development throughout the City, and will assure the long term recreation trail use of appropriate areas. City Planner BB:LH\ma Attachments: Exhibit A - Southern California Edison Memorandum of Understanding DRC2005-00078 Exhibit B - Planning Commission Staff Reports and Minutes dated Apd113, 2005 Exhibit C - Southern California Edison letter dated June 14, 2005 City Council Ordinance for Development Code Amendment DRC2003-01144 Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU") Concerning the Development of Southern California Edison Right-of-Ways within the Corporate Limits and Sphere .of Influence of the City of Rancho Cucamonga The City of Rancho Cucamonga ("City") and Southern California Edison ("SCE") for several years have been engaged in discussions regarding the desire of SCE to develop Right-of-Ways under ownership or jurisdiction of SCE located within the corporate limits of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In addition the City has planned for the use of portions of the SCE Right-of-Ways as community trails, parks, and/or ancillary recreation related uses through the adopted General Plan. As a result $CE and the City have developed the attached "City of Rancho Cucamonga - $CE MOU - Master Plan" ("Master Plan") of SCE's Right-of-Ways dated January 26, 2005, and attached hereto as Exhibit A, which depicts SCE's Right-of-Ways and the land uses which the City and SCE desire to develop and use on said Right-of-Ways. The City has reviewed the proposed uses depicted on the Master Plan and has determined that the proposed uses are, in general, contextually appropriate to the location where each use is proposed. Each of the proposed land uses depicted on the Master Plan, however, are subject to review and approval actions including but not limited to, general plan amendments, zone changes, conditional use permits, development review permits, parcel maps, and building and fire plan checks, depending upon the nature of the proposed land use and its location in the City. The City and $CE recognize that should the SCE Right-of-Ways be developed according to the land use depicted on the Master Plan, the development must occur in an organized fashion, and the projects must be consistent with the City's General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and all other applicable regulations and policies. After considering the community planning issues associated with the development of SCE Right-of-Ways within the City the following understanding and considerations have been determined: 1. The Land Uses depicted on the Master Plan dated January 26, 2005, are, in general, contextually appropriate to the location where each use is proposed. 2. Each development project proposed by SCE will be subject to, and consistent with the City's General Plan, Development Code, and all other applicable regulations and policies. 3. Implementation of the City's Master Plan of Trails as depicted on the Master Plan dated January 26, 2005 are, in general, conceptually appropriate for use within the portions of SCE Right-of-Ways where each use is proposed. 4. Implementation of each City Recreation Facilities and/or ancillary use(s) shall be subject to SCE's review and approval of individual License Agreements, which includes the operating requirements and limitations of SCE. City of R~n~hb,'Cbcamonga: : " ' Mayor~William AJexander Date S6U~herfiiCalif~)mla EdiSOn: -- ~Manager ':'~ ' . ' ' RealE~tate Revenue Division EXHIBrr "A" RANCHO CUCAMONGA - SCE MOA RANCHO CUCAMONGA PROPOSED RECREATION SITES RC- 1 A portion of SCE "fee owned" Right of Way (Lugo-Serrano 500kV Transmission Line) located on the west side of East Ave. for use as a graded dirt lot for special event parking up to twelve (12) times per year for equestrian related events consisting of car, track and horse trailer parking. RC - 2 A 2.00 - 3.00 acre portion of SCE "fee owned" Right of Way located on the east side of the Day Creek Channel, north of the Wilson Ave. for use as an unpaved parking lot for trail user(s) vehicles and possibly rest room facilities. It should be noted that SCE is currently evaluating the future of this property and the possibility of disposition. ~ RC - 3 Trail use for existing 2.50-mile section of the SCE Right of Way (Lugo- Serrano 500kV Transmission Line) consisting of SCE "fee owned" and "easement" property east of the Day Creek Channel, north of 25th St. to the eastern City limits. RC-4 Trail use for existing 1.77-mile section of the SCE Right of Way (Etiwanda-Padua 220kV Transmission Line) consisting of SCE "fee-owned" property north of Summit Ave., east of the Day Creek Channel to the northerly City limits. RC- 5 Trail use for existing .90-mile section of SCE Right of Way (Middle Lugo-Mira Loma 500kV Transmission Line) consisting of SCE "fee owned" property northeast of the Day Creek Channel to the northerly city limits. RC - 6 Trail use for a section of .58 mile of the SCE Right of Way ( Etiwanda- Padua 220kV Transmission Line) consisting of SCE "fee owned" property south of Almond St. and adjacent to Turquoise Avenue. RC - 7 Trail use for a .68 mile section of the SCE Right of Way (Etiwanda-Padua 220kV Transmission Line) consisting of SCE "fee-owned" property north of Almond Avenue and east and west of Carnelian Street. RC - 8 Trail use for a 3.00 miles of SCE Right of Way (Etiwanda-Padua 220kV Transmission Line) consisting of SCE "fee-owned" and "easement" commencing just east of Hermosa Ave. along the northern City limits and ending at the easterly City limits. 6/29/2005 PAGE 1 EXHIBIT "A" RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~ SCE MOA SCE - CURRENT DEVELOPMENT SITKq SCE - 1 Power Storage North Side of Baseline Rd. East of Rochester 8.00 acres (Self Storage) Etiwanda - Pauda 220kV Transmission Line Right of Way SCE - 2 Guardian Storage (Phase ID North Side of Arrow Route, East of Rochester Ave. 14.50 acres (Recreational Vehicle Storage) West Lugo-Mira Loma 500kV Transmission Line Right of Way SCE - 3 Allstate Recycling East side of Etiwanda Ave, So/uth of Arrow Route 1.00 acre (Material Storage & Parking) West Lugo - Mira Loma 500kV Transmission Line Right of Way SCE - 4 R. Critchfield North side of 4th Street, East of 15 freeway 6.00 acres (Self Storage) West Lugo - Mira Loma 500kV Transmission Line Right of Way SCE - FUTURE DEVELOPMENT SITES SCE ~ 5 Future Site South side of Arrow Route, West of 15 freeway 3.94 acres (Possible Uses: Commercial, Industrial or Mixed Use) West Lugo - Mira Loma 500kV Transmission Line Right of Way SCE - 6 Future Site South side Foothill Blvd, west of Day Creek Channel 4.67 acres (Possible Uses: Commercial, Industrial or Mixed Use) West Lugo - Mira Loma 500kV Transmission Line Right of Way SCE - 7 Future Site North side Foothill Blvd., West of Day Creek Channel 1.00 acres (Possible Uses: Commercial, Industrial or Mixed Use) West Lugo-Mira Loma 500kV Transmission Line Right of Way SCE - 8 Future Site North side Foothill Blvd. to Baseline Rd., East of Day Creek Channel 36.00 acre (Possible Uses: Commercial, Industrial or Mixed Use) Etiwanda-Padua 220kV Transmission Line Right of Way 6/29/2005 PAGE 2 1 '7 EXI-I]BIT "A" RANCHO CUCAMONGA - SCE MOA SCE - FUTURE DEVELOPMENT SITES - (continued) SCE - 9 Future Site South side Baseline Road, West of Day Creek Channel _+ 36.00 acres (Possible Uses: Horticulture / Agriculture) West Lugo - Mira Loma 500kV Transmission Line Right of Way SCE - 10 Future Site North side Baseline Road, West of Day Creek Channel _+ 20.00 acres (Possible Uses: Horticulture / Agriculture) West Lugo - Mira Loma 500kV Transmission Line Right of Way SCE- 11 FutureSite South side of Highland Ave., east of Orange Ave. + 15.00 acres (Possible Use: RV & Boat Storage) Etiwanda-Padua 220kV Transmission Line Right of Way 6/29/2005 PAGE 3 : '. ' ~'] 8~ECtAL EVENT DIRT PARKING " PROPOSED TRA~L HEAD .. F-xhlblt A1 1 0 t 2 Miles THE C TY 'O'F I I $~ANCNO CUCANO'NGA: DATE: April 13, 2005 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning CommiSSion FROM: Brad Duller, City Planner BY: Larry Henderson, AICP, Principal Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2003-01144 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend Section 17.16.030 use regulations to allow public storage facilities, including outdoor RV Parking, in the Utility Corridor District.' Related Files: Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-01!30 and Praliminary Review DRC2002-00704. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideratiOn. · ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003-01130 - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON - A request fora public storage facility on 5.38 acres in the Utility Corridor District, along with outdoor RV parking, six storage buildings totaling 71,175 square feet, and a management office of . approximately 1,430 square feet to be located on the north side of'Base Line Road, east.of Day. Creek Flood Control Chanr!el within the Edison power line corridor - APN: 1089-031-12. Related Files: Development Code Amendment DRC2003-01144, Tree ~ Removal Permit DRC2004-00847 and Preliminary Review DRC2002~00704. 'Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:.. A. proiect Density: The proposed project is an outdoor' RV parking and a public storage facility on 5.38 acres in the Utility Corridor District, consisting of six storage buildings totaling 71,175 square feet, and a management office Of approximately 1,430 squara feel ' B. Surround n.q Land Use and Zonina: North Vacaqt/Utility Corridor South - .Base Line Road and Vacant Land/Open Space East Temporary Fire Station, Household Hazardous Waste Collection Center/Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) West Day Creek Flood Control Channel to the west/Open Space PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2003-01130 -SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ' April 13, 2OO5 Page 2 C. General Plan Desk3nations: Project Site - Flood Control/Utility Corridor Norlh' - Flood ContmlAJtility corridor South. - Flood.control/Utility corridor East Low-Medium Residential (4~ dwelling units per acre) west - Flood ContmlAJtility Corridor - D. Site Characteristics: This site is a Southern California Edison (SCE) power line corridor with permanent towers and transmission lines. The easterly 35 feet is reserved for a future " transmission line. Previously, the site was used as a landscape nurse~ with no permanent structures.. The site topography falls from north to south at approximately 2 1/2 percent, and drains to Base Line Road and then eastward towards an existing drain inlet. There are two matura'trees near the southeast comer that are proposed to be removed (DRC2004-00847). E. Parklno Calculations: Number of Number of Type of Use Spaces Required .Spaces Provided Public Storage 6 ' 12 ANALYSIS: 'A. General:. This project include,, three components. The first is an amendment of Section 17.16.030 the Utility Corridor District use regulations t° allow public storage facilities,. including outdoor RV parking in the Utility corridor District with a conditional use permit.. The ' second component consists of plans for a public storage facility.on 5;38 acres in the Utility corridor District,' along with outdoor RV parking, six storage buildings totaling 71,175 Square feet, and a management office.of approximately 1,430 square feet, located on the north side of Base Line Road, east of Day Creek Flood Control Channel within the SCE power line corridor. The third component, which does not require Planning Commission action, is the . processing of' a Memorandum of Agreement between SCE and the City for the master planning of future public recreation use and private commerdal use of fee owned SCE properties within the City. - · ' ' Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-01130~ The architectural, plans submitted are of a high quality design which meets the City's design guidelines and applicable General Plan POlicies, The architecture design is Mediterranean with a strong tower element at the main entrance.. Building materials include decorative cornice,, stucco walls, ledger stone, wainscot, and decorative block perimeter walls consistent with the adjacent Victoria Planned community. · Development Code Amendment DRC2003-01144: This Amendment would amend :the Development Code to allow, subject to a conditional use permit, public storage facilities, including outdoor RV parking in the Utility Corridor District. This amendment issimilar to the regulations that already exist for other, locations in the Industrial zoned areas that are designated OS (Open Space) on which are located Utility Power lines. The City h~is found that. these types of uses are beneficial and reasonably compatible with. adjacent uses including residential. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2003-01130 - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON Apd113, 2005 Page 3 B, Desiqn Review Committee: The Committee reCOmmended approval at its March 1, 2005, meeting. C. · T_echnical Review Commiffee: The Commiffee reCOmmended approval with COnditions. D. Environmental Assessment: Staff has prepared an Initial Study and has recommended a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration, i Development of the site. under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteda pollutants as having a potentially significant impact. Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels.. Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be ·short-term and would cease once COnstruction activities were completed. The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to inCreased noise levels. Mitigation measures contained in this.Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less-than-significant levels in COnnection with the approval of the component of this Project which is the subject of the approval of the Conditional Use Permit and by the .impos fion of site-specific mitigation measures on future applications for self storage facilities in the Utility Corridor Dis~ict. FACTS FOR. FINDING: See attached Resolutions for applicable findings. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-fcet radius of the project site. RECOMMENDATION: ·Staff reCOmmends the Planning Commission adopt the Negative Declaration and approve the attached Resolutions approving Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-01130 and .recommending that the City Council approve Development Code Amendment DRC2003-01144 and adopt the Negative Declaration. Final approval of the Conditional Use Permit is contingent upon City Council approval of the Development Code Amendment.. Respectfully submitted,' City Planner' BB:LH~ma Attachments: Exhibit"A" - Location Map · ~ Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" -. Landscape Plan Exhibit "D" - FlOOr Plan Exhibit "E" - Elevations Exhibit "F" - Initial Study Drafat Resolution of Approval for Development Code Amendment DRC2004-01144 Draft Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-01130 Pamel #o. 1' ® I Gc~t. Lc~ ~ · '~',"', ', ', i,~~--~ ~- ~:~ .... ~- · ~ ~,--~ -- ~J ~ .~ ~ ~ mm~m m, m a +m · , '2' ' ..: · --" .... ~--- ~t =~ "-j ~ . - . · , ~ , .~ · ' ' ~'~l - _ . ~ .' .~ ] OF ;.:'" POWER STORAGE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, LLC PRELIMINARY SITE P~N ~ m O ~ PLANT PALJ::i m*- . ~ ~ · m POWER STORAGE .RANCHO CUOAMONGA, LLO PRELIMINARY ~NDSOAPE P~N ~!~ ~ ~ .' FLOOR pLAN ~ OFFICE · 6 OF8 A1 POWER STORAGE PRELIMINARY UNITMIX PLAN '"'~ ~ '~1~ L~'~u~ RANOHO CU~d~IONGA, CA R 0 U : 't::) ~'VA~ "'.U~U~.OA " ............ ' ' ~ ....... EAST E O ."~;~'"~' , NORTH ELEVATION - OFFIDE~ BUI,?.ING.~ ~*.. " ~~'. ~- ,,~'.-~~~--'~t.?~-~.,.~ ~:}.' //~.,~ 80UTH ELEVATION -BASEUNE ROAD · . .7 OF 8 POWER STORAGE RANCHO CUCAMONGA~ LLC PRELIMINARY ELEVATIONS =~= ~-q~vA~ ~ ~ DROUP .,.... . RANCHO CUOAMONGA, CA : ~ ~'~"~"",ff, ~ . NORTH ELEVATION- BUILDI~G~B ·' ~OUTHELEVATION BUILDINGB, NORTH AND _.. 8OUTH ELEVATIONS BUILDING G, O, E AND F 81MILAR .~'-'~,.-----~. : ' ~ .. (" . r'., .. '...:. . · ·. · . , . ~'-~T ELEVATION- OFFICE, BUll.DING B AND C ~ ~. EAST EbEVATION 8UILDIN~ 8 AND C 81MILAR ' . WEST ELEVATION- BUILDINGS D, *~ ...... EAST ELEVATION BUILDING8 O E AND F 81MILAR · 8 OF'8 POWER STORAGE RANCHO CUCAMONGA~ LLC PRELIMINARY ELEVATIONS ='.~-~ RANCHO OUOAMONGA, CA --,:·': .~ , . .. '~ :, ENVIRONMENTAL ' ' FORM · " · ': (Partl-,Initial Study} ~~~~. ~ .. ~:~'.' . . . ~. ~ .. .. ,F" 9~ ~.,~ ' ~ . I~NI~IN~ORM~N~.~D ~ : .' ~ ~ a) IndUe a descdptlon of a~ permits wMch vaTI be necessmy from the ~ of R~c, ho Cucamonga and ot~er govemment~ agencies in o~der to fully iml~ment ff~e pmjecL' · ..~,~' t~:'~,,~ ~.~u~,,~.~(~~)....' ' · :' · '~J, 'L~ (~ ~ ~~; ' " " · ~/W~m. ~ . . . - ~~'.' .. · . · .. ~' .. . I I.tPl &~NIJ~'~ClI~A! ~FORM-~COUNTER~NI'TSTDI'WPD 3~00 :. PeGe a '16.Ol ANNING~FiNALIFORMb~OOUNT~RUNffb-~I'O1-WPD ~/00.. · ~ :. : p~ge 5 whether units am mnMI or for =ele units): · ~ ~ .,~p,t, u r,,,~ ' .- · ',,~.~.,~,(,~. ~'..s ': ., ,Re~f. (Permon~) $ ~] Spec~/ number ~ bed .morm t . : 2~)lndi~te M expected ngmb6'r of ~ children v2m will be within the pmje~ Cordact M appiopdate ~hool ,, ,Sen~rHIgh~ .. .'~' COMMERCIAL~ INDUSTRIAL ,AHD IHSTITI. FITONAL PROJEC~ . ** '.~,,~. ~)~.~(,)~ ~..~ . ... .. . . . , · . . , . I ~ ' t ,' # I ' ' "' · ' Page herbidde~; fu~l~ ~Ts, ~lvent~ and o~er flammable ~quMs and gase& Also note'unde~gr°und ~torage of any of the aboV~ '. please li~t the mateda!s.and de,~:ribe their use, .s.~ge, ~nd/or discharge on the pmp .e~ty, aa welJ e~ thp dates of use, ff .* · ~mate~/~./ndud*~g bur not*//m/~ed to ~ examp/e~ ~'ted a~xwez /fye~ provue en/nventOO' of aB ,~uch nmteda/~ to .~ :. .. . ... .I m.,i,u~tmq~,r_~dAiAi:tqRM.R~.X.~AjN.ri:RUNiTb_~rD1;WPD3~00 . : .., ,. ,. Pege8 .ATi.ACHMENT A Water Usage · ' ' · /~,verage u~e per da;/ " Resident]al .' · * Single Family 600 gal/day. * · .. Apt/Condo' 400 gal/day, . · Comn~erclal/lndustrlal 3000 gal/day/a~ " · ' ' · General and Regional Commercial. . ." Neighborhood Comrne~c;a; .1500 gal/dayla~ . General Industflal 1500 gal/day/ac Industrlel Park 3000 gal/day/ao .' ' Peak Usage Fo~ ell uses. Average .use x 2.0 .. Sewer Flow~. ResidenOal 270 gal/day shgle Fam ,fl x oa 200 gal/day Ci)mmerclal/IndU.~ General Comrn~al 2000 g~l/day/ac ·. Neighborhood Commercial 100-1500 gal/day/ao ~.lndusMal ' 2000 gal/daylao Heavy I~:lust~al 3000 gaVd .aylao · 8ource: .C~ca. monga County Water Dbtflct. Mester Plan, ~ .i:~r~.ANNiNG~FiNALtFo~UNTERUN./TSll)'I.WPD 3/00 · Contact' t~ school district for your area for arnountand payment*of schoo~ fees:. . . Ei~ment'ry Schoo~ O~Um= r. . · .9350 Base Une Road, Suite F ...' ' * ~ . i' ' · RanCho Cucamonga.. CA 91730 . ;.. · . · (~0~) e87-07~' .- . · , .- : 10601 Chu..r~. S~,~.Su~ 1t2 .... .. · · Ran~Cucamong~ CA gt730 (909) 989-8541 .. · ' Rnncho Oucamonga, CA g1730 ". ' (~0~) KT-m~4~' . '- ' · $95g East Avenue ". · P.O. Box248 Rancho Cuc:arriong~ CA g1739 '. · ..~.) ~.~ 8~.' ' High ' · .. ~11 west st~ sve~t" -' Ontario. CA 9176~ : '" /:ANNiNG~FINAL~Fo~NTERUN~'I.VVPD 3/00 . ' Page 10 - VALLI .- ARCHITECTURAL GROUP DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL POWER STORAGE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, LLC PROJECT NO. 0'~-260 c.~IIMRIA. SUITE200 AUSOVIEJO, CA926..'~ PH:949-349-1/~'7 FAX: 949-349-1778 E'MAII.-:mall~Nalliarch.c°m. July 14, 2003 Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga . . Community Development Department *' 10500 Civic. Center. Ddve ... Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: . power Storage Ranch° Cucamonga, [.LC' Project No.' 01-260 We would like to request ~°ur approval of a Conditional Use Permit, for the pmposed 72,843 square feet self storage facility consisting of a 71,408 square feet of self-storege. 1,435 square feet management office, and outdoor RV parking spaces. The. site is on the northerly side of Baseline Road between the streets Rochester Avenue and Day Creek Blvd. The western property line lies 30 feet east of the easement for the Day Creek. Channel. Currently, the site is being used as a nursery with no permanent structures. The existing sheds are dated and have no foundations. · . The site topography is relatively fiat, and it falls from the north to the south at approximately 2.5 %. The site currentiy drains .to Baseline Road .Benefit to the CommUnttv The project objective is to provide a quality self storage facility that will better serve the needs of the community. The demographics of the tenant profile for this include local business professionals who usually store records and office equipment, ·home based businesses, and households within the community. Self storage projects have proven to be ~xce lent ne ghbors both for COmmercial and residential neighbors alike, It requires minimum city services from water, sewer, police and fire departments. It adds minimum traffic to the neighborhood as most storage tenants visit thalr unit'during off-peak.hours and on weekends. It also brings to the city a much needed tax base. Minimum Traffic impact According to the Institute of Transportation Engineers (iTE), self-storage generates the lowest · level of traffic commercial~ retail, office or industrial land uses. · Self-storage peak hours vehicle trip rate is 0.17 trips/i,000 SF to 0.258 trips/l,000 SF. *For this project this data translates to 11.5 to 17.5 vehicle trips at peak hour use Periods. This hapPens usually in the mornings during the week. The average traffic generated (14.5 Peak hour vehicle trips) during a ·nine hour weekend business day would total less than 130 trips/day with four employees. The new building addition with its traditional California architecture will greatly enhance the overall character of the facility, bringing'a much needed improvement to the Baseline Road street scape. · ' The building is well articulated. ItS design incorporates various roof heights and masses, projections and recessed wall planes. Further interest is created through the use of different building materials, such as stucco and mission tile roofing, and architectural details and colors. The state-of-the-art design will elevate the Standards for new development in the area and serve as a catalyst for other quality developments. Current operation hours will be kept. The office will typically be open from 8am to 6pm from Monday to Sunday.. There will be 2 to 4 employees working at the site. Two employees'will work at the facility during business hours, occupying the office at all times from opening to dosing. The new self-storage addition will boast a 'new state'of the-art security system with individual door alarms, security Cameras, and an infrared alarm system. The site will also have a new computerized gate system. The proposed Power StOrage facility will be a modem aesthetically pleasi.ng project with state- of-the art secudty systems, It will be a major benefit to the community with minimum impact to existing public utilities, services and traffic. ~ ' We respectfully submit the proposed addition for your review and'request YOur approval of'a Conditional Uss Permit. Ariel L Valli President Valli Architectural Group POWER STORAGE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, LLO PHOTO LOOATION PLAN "-- · City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST'FORM · " 'INITIAL STUDY ·PART II, BACKGROUNO . 1. Project File: Development Code Amendment DRC2003'01144 and condlaonal use permit DRC2003-O1130 2. 'Related FI!es: Tree Removal Permit DRC2004'00847 end Preliminary Review DRC2002-00704 S. Deecrlptlon of Project: A reqUest to amend section 17.16.030 the Utility Corridor District-use regulations to allow public storage facilities, including outdOOr RV parking and a request for a public storage facility on 5.38 acres' in the Utility Corridor District, along with outdoor RV parking, slx storage buildings totaling 71,175 square feet, and a management off.me of approximately 1,430 square feet to be located on the north side of Rase Line Road, east of Day Creek Flood Control Chennel within the Edison power line c0rridor- APN:. 1089-031-!2. . 4. Project Sponsor'e Name and Address: ' . · Bouthem California Edison. Michael Orduno, CCIM Land Development Manager · 14799 Chestnut Street' .WeStmln'stei~, CA 92683' .6.. General Plan Deslgnatton= Flood Control/Utility Corridor. 6. Zoning: Utility Cordder. 7. Surrounding Land uses and Setting: Utility CorridOr to the north. Day Creek Flood Gontrol · · Chennel'to the west, Temporary Fire Station, Household'Hazardous Waste Collection Center, and · Flood Control D strict Maintenance Facility to the east, Base Line Road and Utility Corridor to' the 6. Lead Agency Name and Ad.dreee:. ' City of Rancho Cucamonga .. ' Plennlng Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cuc, amonga, CA 91730 '~. Contact person and Phone Number:.. ·Larry Henderson, AICP, Principal Planner (909) 477-2750 .- 10. Other agencies whose approval la required. (e.g., permits, financing appmvai, or partlblpatioo agreement): California Public Utilities Commission GLOSSARY- The following abbreviations amused In this report: · CVWD ~ Cucamonga Valley Water District : · EiR- E~vlronmental Impact RepOrt -. .. 'FEIR = Final Environmental Impact Report NPDES - National Pollutent Discharge Elimination System NOx' Nitrogen Oxides. · ' ROG - Reactive Orgenic Gases .. PMm - Fine Particulate Matter RWQCB - Regional Water Qual. ity Control Board SCAQMD - South Coast Air Quality Management District SWPPP- Storm Water Pollution PreventlOO Plan URBEMIS7G - Urban Emissions Model 7G Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-01130 Page 2 · 'ENViRoNMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED · The environmental factors checked below'would be potentially affected by'this pmject,'lnvolving at least one Impact that is a."Potentially Significant Impact," ?otentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation IncorPorated~* or 't.ess Than Significant Impacff' as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ) Aesthetics ( ) Agricultural Resources. (X)Air Quality · ) B ologlcal Resources · (X) Cultural Resources' (X) Geology & Soils ' Land Use & Planning ) Hazards & Waste Matedais (X) Hydrology & Water Quality I I' population & Housing Mineral Resources ' (X) Noise Public Services · ( ) Recreaflan ( ) Transportation/Traffic Utilities & Service S),~tems ( )Mandator~ Findings of Significance DETERMINATION · , · '. on the basis of this inltlai evaluation: ( ) I find that the pmP°Sed project cOULD NOT have. a significant ef~ on' the environment, A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. · : · · (X} I find that although the proposed project could have a significant'effectl on the environment, ~hore .... will not be a sign/flcant effect In this case beCause revisions In the project haVe been made by, or agreed to, by Ihe.project. prpponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared, () I find that the proposed project 'MAY have a significant effect on the environment, end. an ENVlRONME.NTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. · () I find that the proPosed Project MAY have a "potent ~lly Significant Impact' or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated"impact on the environment, but at leaat'olle effect 1) has been adequately analyzed In an earlier dOCUment pursuant to applicable legal standard and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as deecrlbed on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but It must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. () I find that although th~ Proposed project .could have a significant effect, on the environment, because ati potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately In an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to' applicable standards, and. 2) have been avoMed or mitigated pursuant' to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, includIng revisions or mitigation measures that are Imposed upon the proposed project,, nothing further is required. Initial Study for .- . City of Rancho CUcamonga DP, C2003-01130.. .. . ' Page 3 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1; AESTHETICS. Would the projecY. · (). () (). (v') . ' . a) Have a substantial affect a scenic vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, ' ( ) ( ) ' ( ) ('/') but not limited.to, b'ees, rock outcroppings, and · hlstodc buildings within a State Scenic Highway? . "' ' c) · Substantially degrade the existing visual character ( ) ( ) ( ) i~ (v') or quality of the site and Its surroundings? - d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, ( ) ( ) (v') ( ) which would, adversely affect day er nighttime views In the area? a) There are ho significant vistas within or adjacent to the project. Site.. The site is not withlrl a view corridor according to General Plan Exhibit 111-15. b) · The project site. contains n0'scenicreSources and no.historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway. There are no State Scen c H ghways within the City of Rancho Cucemonga. c~ The site is located on th'e north Side of Bose· Line Road, east of Day Creek Flood Control ~Channel within the Edison power line corridor and is characterized by a mix of residential, utility, and nstitutional development to the north, south, east, and wsaL The visual quality of the orea will not degrade as a result of this prejecL Design review Is required prior to approval. City standards require.the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures · In acoOrdance with Planning Commission Resolution NO. 87-96, unless exempted by saki ResolUtion° d) ~ project WOuld Increase the number of streetiighta and security lighting usad In the Immediate vicinity. The design and placement of light fixtures will be shOWn on' Site Plans which require review for consisten~.-'y with. City standards that requires shielding, ditfiJslng, or Indirect lighting to avoid glare~ Ughtlng will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to withl~ the project site; The Impact is not conslderad slgnlflcanL .. 2. AGRICULTURAl-RESOURCES. Would the project~ ... () (') ' (e,) ' (). a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Fam~land, or Farmland of Statewkie Importance (Farmland), as · shown, on' the maps prepared pursuant to the .' · Farmland'Mapping and Monitoring Program of the . California Resources Agen':Y, to non-agrlcolturel .use? · b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or ( ) . ( ) · . a Williamson Act contract? : . c) Involve other changes In the existing enviror,,,=,[, ( ) ( ) ( )' which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? a)' The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farn~land of statewlde' ' Imporlance. The site is located.on approximately 6.48 acres of landand Is characterized by Initial Study for. ' City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-01130 . . Page4 utility corridor development to the north and south, institutlonal use ~o the east, and flood conl~'ol channel to the wesL Them are approximately 1,300 acres of Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance wi:thin the 'CRY' of Rancho Cucamonga, of which ·about one-third Is either developed or commlffed to development according to General Plan Table IV-2. The major concentrations of designated farmlands are located In the Southern and eastern portions of our City that Is characterized by existing and planned development, Further, two-thirds of the designated farmland parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their: economic viability Is doubtful; therefore,, they are not intended to be retained as farmland In the General Plan Land Use Plan.. The General Plan Final Envi~:onmental Impact Report (FEIR) identified the conversion of farmlands to urban Uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed pmje~ Is consistent with the General Plan for which lhe FEiR was prepared and Impaots evaluated.. : b) · Them Is no agriculturally zoned land'within the .CRy .of Rancho Cucamonga. 1'here are no Willlamson ACt contmcta within Ihe CRy; .. c) The site IS located on approximately 6.48 acres of land and Is characterized by uttIRy'corridcr development, and to utility corridor development to the north and south, Institutional use to the east, and flood control channel to the'weaL The nearest agricultural use IS more than ~ milo east from the pmjeq=t site. Therefore, no advars~.lmpacts are anticipated. : . · ~. AIRQUALJI'Y..WouldtheproJect: . ' () .(). () a) Conflict with or obsb-uct'implementatiOn of the appllcobks air quaflty plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or cu,,b;C, dte () (~') () () substantially to an existing or. pmjestad air quality o) Result In a cumulatively considerable net ir,~ =asa ( ) ( ). ( ) (v') of any ~rlterla pollutant for which the project region ks non-attainment under an applicable. Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including ·: releaelng emissions that exceed .quantitative .* - '. thresholds for ozone precursors? ' · d) : Expose sensitive receptors to sub~i~iai pollutant ( ) (v') () ( ) concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting .a substantial ( ) ( ) ( ) ('~) · number of people? a) As noted In the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.6), continued development will Contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga .ama, which already exceed Federal and State standards. The General Plan FEIR identified .the cltywlde increase In emL~lona as a. significant unavoidable adverse Impact 'for which a Statement .of Overfldlng Cons deratione was ultimately adopted by {he CRy. Counell; The. proposed project ks consistent with .the , General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and Impacts evaluated, - b) Dudng the conslmctl°n phases of development, on-site'stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction' worker vehicles, and energy use will generate ernleslone. In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during .grading and construction activities. While most of the dust would settle on or near the project site, smaller particles would remain. In the atmosphere, IncreaSing particle levels within the surrounding area. Construction Is an on.going. Industry In the Rancho Cucamonga area.. Construction workers and equipment City of Rancho Cucam0nga Initial Study for Page 5 DRC2003-01130 work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete. They then transfer to a different site where the process begins again. Therefore, the emissions associated with', cc~nstrUction activities are not new to the Rancho Cucamonga area and they would not violate · an air quality standard or women the existing air.quality in the region. Nevertheless. fugitive dust and equipment emissions am required to be assessed by the South Coast/Ur Quality Management Disfltct (SCAQMD) on a project-specific basis. Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to lees-than-significant levels:. 1) ~ All construction equipment shall be malntalned In good oPeratl'ng condition so · as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that ell construction equipment Is being properly servlced and malntelned aa per manufacturem' specifications. Maintsnanca records shall, be available at the construction site for City verification.. · . 2) Prior to the Issuance of any Grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. constrUCtion contractors shall provide evidence that Iow-emission mobile construction equipment will be. utilized, or that their uso was Inyestlgated and found to be Infeasible for the project. Contractors shall · also conform to any construction measures Imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD} aswa!l as City Planning staff. 3} Ail. PaintS and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted In SCAQMD Rule ttt3. Paints and coatings shall be applied.either by'hand or high.volums,.Iow-prsseura spray. 4). Ail asphaIt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted In SCAQMD Rule 5) ' Ail construction equipment shall comply'with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall Include the following provisionS: ' · Reestablish ground cover 'on the construction site through seeding and watering . Pave or apply gravel to any on-alto haul roads. ' · : ' Phase grading to. prevent fJle susceptibility Of large arsaa to eroslon'over · extended periods of time. · Bchedule activities to minimize the' ~mounts of exposed excavated sell during and aftoi' the end of work periods. · Dispose of surplus ·excavated matbrlal In accordance welt loCal ordinances and use.sound engineering practlcee~ . · Sweep streets 'according to a schedule established by the City If Slit. I$ carried 'over' to adjacent public thoroughfares or ocoUre as a result of hauling.. Timing may vary depending upon the time Of year of construction. · Suspend grading operations during high winds (I.e., i'wind sPeeds excae,dlng 25 mph) In accordance with Rule' 403 requirements. · · Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tsrps or other suitable means. . · * 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stablllzlng'agant (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB])* dally to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM~0) emissl0ns, lit accordance.with SCAQMD Rule 403. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-0! 130 ~ Page 6 7) Chemlcal soll-stablitzers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to ail Ina~;tlve constructl0n areas that remain Inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~, emissions. 8) The construction co'ntractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powersd equipment where leas!bls.. 9). *The construction contractor shall ensure that ConstrUction grsding plans Include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not In use. After Implementation of ~e preCeding mitigatiOn measures; short-term construction air quality emissions would remain significant as noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.6). Based Upon the Urban Emissions Model 7G (URBEMISTG) model estimates In Table 5.6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, Nitrogen Oxides (Nox), Reactive Organic OaseS (ROG), and Fine PartiCUlate Matter- (PM~0) would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance; therefore, would all be CUmulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated 'on a project basis to a level leSs-than-signifiCant. The General Plan FEIR Identified the citywlde increase In emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse Impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Count. In the long-term; development COnsistent With the General ·Plan· would result'In slgn;flcent operational vehlele emissions based .upon the 'URBEMIS7G model estimates In Table 5.6-4 of the General Plan FEIR;'therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-SlgnificenL The followlr)g mitigation measures shall be Implemented: 10) All Industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requlrtng that. truCks shall not be left Idling for prolonged periods (I.e., In excess of 10 mlnutas). 1i) Ail Industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential Parking for vanpool.. · 12}' Ail InduStrial and commercial slta tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to pest both bus and Metrolink schedules In conspicuous, area~.. . 13) Ail Industrial and commercial site tenants with $0 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. 14)' Ail residential and commercial structures shall be requlrad to Incorpo~a~- high-efficiency~Iow-polluting heating, air Conditioning,. appI!ancee, and water heaters. ,, · 15} Ail residential and Commerctal structures shall be requlrad to Incorporate therroal pens windows and weather-stripping. · - · After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan' FEIR · Identified the cltywide increase In operational omissions as a significant unavoidable . adverse impact for which a Statement of Overflding Considerations was ultimately. · adopted by the City Count. ' c) As noted in the General Plan' FEIR (Section 5.6) continued development would Contribute to · the pollutant levels In the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and Stats' standards. The General Plan FEIR identified the eltywide Increase in emissions as a significant and adverse Impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ~' City of Rancho Cucamonga Initial StUdy for ~ ' Page 7 DRC2003-01130 . ' ' ultimately adopted bi the CIty Council. The Project proposed is consistent with the General plen for which the FEIR was prePared and Impacts eval~Jated. ... d) Sensitive receptors ara defined as .populations that ars more susCeptible to the effects of pollution than the poputstlon at large. The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors: long-term health cars facilities, rehabiiitation canters, convalescent .canters, · retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child card canters, and athletic'facilities.' "According to the SCAQMD, projects have the potential to create significant impala' If they ars located within % mile of sensltlve receptors and would' emit toxic air contaminants · , identified In SCAQMD Rule '1401. According to the SCAQMD, projects have the potential to · create significant impacts If they are located'within % mile of sensitive receptom and would · emit toxic air contaminantS Identified In SCAQMD Rule 1401. The projeot site is located within ~ mile Eom the nearast sensitive receptor:, single-family resldencaS to the west and north, The mitigation measures listed under b) above will reduce Impacts to a level of lees-than-SlgnificanL e). TYPically, the uses proposed do not create objectionable odors. No adverse Impacts am anticipated. 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would. the proJec~ · a) ' Have a substantial adverse effec~ etiher directly Or through habitat medifi~atiens, en any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, .or special status species In local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S; Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial .adverse effeot on ripadan habitat or other .sensitive natural community identified In local or regional plans, pollcis~, or regulations or by the Califomla Deparl~nant of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally () protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water A~ (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through dire~ rsmoval, filling, hydrological Interruption, or other .. means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any naliVe rasident or migratory fish or wildlife species or.with established native resident or mlgratcry wldlife.'corridors., or 'impede the use of native · wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological, rasources, :Such as a tree prsservation policy or ordinance? · f) Conflict with. the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan? " a). The project site is located In an' area developed With Utilities and Institutional uses. The site has been previously disrupted, during previous use as a Nursery and dlsclng for weed · Initial stUdy for." CJity of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-01130 Page 8 abatemenL According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5.3 of the General PIan FEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plantS or animals because of the fact that the project I~ surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent · with the General Plan Land Use Plan. · b) 'The project site Is located in an urban area with no natural COmmunities. No riparian habitat exists on-site, meaning the project will not have any impacts.. : .. o) No. wetland habitat Is present on-site. As a result, project Imp ementaflon would have no Impact on th.ese resources; · d) The majority of the surrounding area has been oi; is being developed, thereby disrupting any wildlife COrridors that may have existed. No adverse impacts are anticipated. e) There are two heritage' trees near the southeast COmer of the project Site. The proposed project design Includes over a dozen new trees along 'street frontage. The applicant.has filed a request for Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00847.. f) The project site Is not located wlthi~ a COnservation area'according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Exhibit IV-4. No COnflicts with habitat conservation ~ plans' will occur. ' · 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. WOuld the project: ( ) ( ). ( ) . (v')' a) Cause a substantial adverse change In the significance of a historical resource as defined th § 15064.5? · · . b) Cause e substantial adverse change, in the () (/) () ' () significance of: an archaeological resource i · pursuant to § 15064.5? . . c) Directly or indirecity destroy a unique . ( ) (v') ( ). ( ) paleontological resource or site or unique geologic d) Disturb any human remains, including ~,'i~ () (.) () (v') interred Outside of formal cemeteries? a) The project site has not been Identified as a."Historic Resource' per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2.24 (Historic Preservation)..Them.will be no Impact. b) There are no knoWn archaeological sites or resources recorded, on the project site; however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known .to have been 'inhabited' by Native Americans according, to the General Plan FEI, (Section 5..11). ,Con_st~.cflOn ,. ~ct~., P.a.ri. loula?d grading, soil excavation, and compaction, could anversely alrect or esmmata exlonng an potential archaeological resources. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented: t) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer Will retain a ~qualifled archaeologist to 'monitor · construction activities, to take appropHate measures to protect or preserve them. for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the .City of'Rancho · Cucamonga will: Initial Study for City Of Rancho Cucamonga · Page 9 DRC2003-01130- · Enact Interim measures to protect· undesignated sitss ·from demolition or significant modification without an opporturi ty for the City to establish Its arohaeeloglcal value; . · Consider establishing previsions to requlrs incorporation of archaeological sltss within new developmentS, using their special qualifies as a theme or · .. focal point. .. - · PUrSue educating the public about'the arca's archaeological he. ritagd~ ' · i~ropose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverSe Project effects on significant, important, and Unique prehistoric resources, foliowing appropriate CEQA guidalines~I · prepare s technical resourCeS management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. 'Submit one copy of the completed report with original Illustrations, to the San Bernardlno County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archlvlng.. . c) The General Plan FEIR (SeCtion 5.11) indlcat6s that the' Rancho Cucamooga area is on an .alluvial fan. According to the San Bemardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho-Cucamonga or the sphere-of- influence, including the project site; however, the area has. a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources. The older alluvium, which would have bean deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of' the Quaternary period, when the last 'Ice Age' and the appearance of modern man occurred,' may contain significant vertebrate fossils. The project site is underlain by Quatemary alluvium per General Plan Exhibit'V-2; therefore, the following mltlgatlon measUrss.shall be " Implemanted~ . '2) A qualified 'paleontologist shell conduct a preoonstruction field survey of the · project site. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will ales provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monltor!ng) that may be appropriate. Whare mitigation monitoring Is appropriate, the program must include, bu~ not be limited to, the following measures: . · Assign s paleontological m~nltor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delaY, to the site full-time' during the interval of earthTdlsturbing activ~itiea. ' · Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, diver~ earth-disturbing activities .e sewhers until the monitor has completed Salvage. If construction 'personnel make the..dlaOOvery, the grading contractor should immediately divert oonstruotion and noufy the monitor of the find. ' · .. · Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga- Transfer collected specimens with 'a copy of the report to.the .San Bernardlno County Museum. -d) The propOsed project is In an area that has already bean disturbed by development. The project site has already been disrupted by previous· use as a Nursery. and construction of · infrastnJctura and surrounding develOpments/annual discing for weed abatement. .No known religious Or batted sites exist within the project area. No evidence Is In place to suggest tho ·project site has been. used for human burials. The' Califomla Health and'Safety Code (Section 7050.5) states that If human remains are discovered on-slte~ no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coron. er has made a determination of odgin and disposltio,~ Initial Study for . City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-01130 Page 10 pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98;' As adherence to State regulations Is. required far all development, no mitigation is required in the unlikely event human remains' are discovered on-site.. No adveme impacts ara.anticipated. 6. · 'GEOLOGY.AND SOILS. Would the proj~. · '. 'a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects including the risk of loss,. Injury, or . . · ~ .death Involving: I) Ruptura of a known earthquake fault, as ( ) ( ). ( ) (v') delineated on the most recent Alquist-Prlolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map Issued by the 'State Geologist far the area or based on other substantial evidence of a. known fault? Refer 'to Dlvislea of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. II) Strong seismic ground shaking? ill) Seismic-related ground failure, including ( ) () ( ) liquefaction? Iv) Landslides? ' b) · Result in substantial soil 'erosion or the.loss of '() (,/') () () topsoil? c) Be Iocatod on a geologic unit or soil ..that Is ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') unstable, or that would become unstable as a result · of the project, and potentially rasult In on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence liquefaction or collapse? · ' d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined In Table ( ) ( ) () 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the ( )' ( ) ( ) use ~ septic tanks or alternative wastewater · disposal systems where sewers are not available .. . · for the disposal of westewatad/' a) . NO known faults pass Ihrough Ihe stie and It Is not In an Earihquake Fault Zone, ~or Is it Inlhe Rancho Cucemonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Exhibit V-I, and Section 5.1 of the General Plan FEIR. The Red Hill Fault, passes within 1.04 miles north of the site, and the Cucomonga Fault Zone lies approximately 3.36 miles norlh. These faults ara bOth capable of producing ~ 6.0-7.0 earthquakes. A~o, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to M~ 7,5 earthquakes, Is 8 to 10 miles northeasterly of the site and the San Andreas, capable of up'ta M,, 8.2 earthquakes, is8 to 10 miles northeasterly of the.sEe. Each of these faults can produce strong groundshaking. Adhering to the Uniform Building Code will eos.ura that geologic impacts are lass-than-slgnificont. 'The proposed project will requlra the' excavation, steckpiling, and/or m0vemont of on-sEe soils. The Rancho Cucem0nga area is subject to strong. Santa Aha wind condlbons during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates eraslon problems. Construction activities may.temporarily exacerbate the Impacts of windblown sand, resulting '. In temporary problems of dust control; however, development of 'this project under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts In the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established. Therefore, the fallowing fugitive dust mitigation · measures shall be implemented to reduce Impacts to leas-than-significant levels: · City of Rancho Cucamonga Initial Study for Page 11 DRC2003-01130 1) The site shall be treated with Water or other ~oll-stablllzing agent (apProved by SCAQMD. and' RWQCB) dally to reduce PMk. emisslone, In accordance with 'SCAQMD Rule 403 or rs-planted with drought resistant landscaping as eoon ea possible · . 2) .Frontage public streets shall be Swept according to a schedule, established by. the City to reduce PM~0 emissions assoclated with vehicle tracking ,of soil off- elto. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction; 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wlnd.'speede exceed 25 mph to minimize PM:~0 emleslons from the site during.such episodes. 4) Chemical s0E.stablllzars (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all Inactive construction areas that remain ,Inactive for 96 hours or' more to reduce PMk. emissions. C) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5.1) Indicates that subsidence 'IS generally associated with large decreases Or withdrawals of water from the aquifer. '.The prOject WOuld not' withdraw water from the existing aquifer. The site is'not within a geotechnlcel hazardous area or other unstable geologic unit or'soil type according to General Plan FEIR Figure 5.1-2. Soil types On-sEa consist of TvC Soil association according to General Plan FEIR ExhlbE 5.t-3. No adverse Impacts ars anticipated .' - d) The majority of Rancho Cucam0nga, Including the project site, Is located on alluvial soil deposits. These types of soils ars not considered to be expansive. Soil types on-sEe consist of TvC Soil association according to General Plan Exhibit V-3 and General 151an FEII=- Exhibit 5.1-3. These s° s ars typically Gravelly Loamy Sand. No adverse Impacts ere anticipated. e) The prOject Will connect to, and be served by, th.e eX!,Stlogl, ,o, ,cal_Sroe~e~l,YS. tam for wastawater disposal. 'No septic tanks or alternative wastewa[er olspesal rs prolx~= . · 7. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIAJ-~.. Would the () a) create a significant hazard to the publto or the environment through the routine transport, use, or · diu~,usal of hazardous b). Create a sign;;;?n~ hazard to the public or the . () ( ) ( ). (v') · . environment through rsasonably forsseeable upset · and ~ccident conditions Involving the release of . hazardous materials into the environment? c) EmE hazardous emissions or handle hazardous er . ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') aCUtely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school? - d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of ( ) ( ) ( ) (v~). 'hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant, to Government Coda Section 65962.5 and, as a . result, WOuld 'It create a .significant hazard to the public or the env;roni~ent? e} For a project located within an a;~po~ land use plan . ( ) ( ) ( ) · (v') · or, where such. a plan has not been adopted, within · 2 miles of a public alrpod or public use alq3ort, . . .. · would the project result In a safety hazard for people residing or working In the project area? . Initial Study for · . .. City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-01130 . " Page 12 f). For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') would the project result In a safety hazard for people residing or working in the proiect area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? · h) Expose people or structures to a significant dsk of ( ) ( ) ( ) (,") loss, injury or death Involving wlldland fires, · including where wlldlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are · Intermixed with wlldlande? a) The project wlli n°t Involve. the transport, use, or' disposal of hazardous materials.* The City participates in a countywide Interagency coalition that Is considered a full service H~'~rdous Materials Division that Is more cornprehenslve that any other in the state. The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Mu tiHazard .Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials end/or waste ',~11 reduce the potential for significant · - impacts to a level less-than-significant No edveme impacts are expesa~. b) The proposed project d°es nat Include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels. The City participates In a countywide Interagency coalition that Is considered a full Service Hazardous Materials DivIsion that Is moro comprehensive than any other In the state. The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies. ComplIsnca with Faderel, State, end local regulations COncerning the · . storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels' will reduce the potential .fa' significant Impacts to a level tasS-than-slgnificant.' .No adverse Impacts are anticipated. ~) There aro n°'schools located within ~ mile of the project site. The project see Is located withlrl .57 mile of fi*m* nearest exIsting (Cadton P. Lighffoot and Windrow elementary) or proposed school (Arbors elementary). No impacts are anticipated. d) The'proposed project Is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance matadals see. Recent see. .. Inspaction did not reveal the p.rosence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of h=':mrdoua materials. No Impact Is anticipated. . e) The site Is not located wfthin an airport land use plan and'Is not within'2 miles of a public alrporL The project see Is located approximately 3 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and Is offset north of the flight path. No Impact Is.anticipated. t) The nearest private aJrslrtp,' Cable Airport, Is located approximately 2 ~ rnlies to the west of the City's westarfy limlts~ No Impact Is anticipated, g). The City's Multi-Hazard Disaster Plan, which IS updated every two yesre~ Includes policies and · procedures to be administar~d by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District In the event of a disaster. · Because the project Includes at least two points of public street access and IS required to comply with all applicable City codes, Including local fire ordinances, no adverse Impacts. are anticipated. h) Rancho Cucamonga' faces the groatest ongoing threat from a wind-driven fire In the Urban Wi~disnd Interface area found in the northern part of the City according 'to the Fire District Slrategic.Plen 2000--2005; however, the proposed project site Is not located within a high fire hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-7.. In t a Study roi' Cit7 of Ranch0 Cucamonga DRC2003-01130 Page 13 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the () (v').. ( ) () 'a) Violate any water quality standards'er waste discharge ~equlrements? · b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or () () .. () (v') interfera substantially with groundwater recharge such that them ·would be a net deficit In aquifer : volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table ' level (e.g.~ Ihe production rata of prc cxisflng nearby wells would drop to a level which would not ~... . support existing ·land uses or planned uses for · ~ which permits have been granted)? · c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') the site or area, Including through the alteration.of the course of a stream er river, In a manoer, which would result In substanfiaJ erosion er siltation on- or off-site? d) Substantially. alter the existing drainage pattern of ( ) ( ) ( ) (~") the site or area, including through the alteration of · the coume .of a stream or .river, or substantially ..- increase the rata or amount of surface runoff In a manner, which would result In flooding on- or off- . slta? e) Create or contribute, runoff water which, would ( ) ( ) ( ) (~) exceed the capacity of existing or planned , stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? 0 Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? · ( ) (V') ( ) ' ( ) g) .Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area ( ) ( ) . .( ) (v'). as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard ' · · : delineation map? h) Place withIn a 100-year flood hazard ~,,~ () () () · structures that would Impede or redJract flood flowS? I) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ( ) .( ) ( ). (") loss, injury or death involving flooding, Including · flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? ( ) ( ) ( ) ('") a)~ water and sewer Service is provided by the Cucamonga'Valley' Water District (CVWD). project is designed to connect toexlsting water and sewer systems. The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination S~tam (NPDES) permit under Section 402 of' the Clean Water Act The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an industrial activity,' requiring a permit under the State's General NPDES permit. The State Water Resource Conlml Board (SWRCB) through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Santa Aha Region, administers these .permits. . .. . . Construction activities covered under the State's General constructl0r~ permit' Include remOVal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or. any other activity for new development or significant redevelopmenL Prior to commencement of construction of a project, a discharger Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-01130 Page 14 must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the. General ~PermlL The General permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction' activities, including site clearance'and grading: . · Develop'and implement a Sto~rn Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that would specify Best Management Practices [BMPs) that would prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion fi'om moving off-site into receiving waters. · Eliminate or reduce non-storm water discharges .to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation. · Perform Inspections of all BMPs. Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction project discharges. A construction proJect for new development or significant redevelopment requires an NPDES permit. Construction project proponents ara required to prepare an SWPPP. To comply with the NPDES, the construction contractor of the project will be required to prepare an SWPPP during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post- construction operational management of storm water runoff. The applicant has submitted a WQMP, prepared by RMA on February 21, 2005, that identifies Best Management (BMPs) to minimize the amount of pollutants such as eroded soil,,, entering the drainage system after construction. Runoff from driveways, roads, and other Impermeable surfaces must be controlled through 'an on-site drainage system. BMPs Include both structural and non-structural control' methods. Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oil/grit separators; and porous pavement. Not,structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through Implementing Erosion and Sediment Control Plan,,, and various business plan,, that mu,,t be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials. Practices, such as periodic parking .lot sweeping,, can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants.entering the stom3 drain system. The following mitigation measures WOuld be requlrad to control additional stems water 1. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permlto, the permit' applicant ,,hall submit to .. Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan ($WPPP) spoclficelly Identifying .Best Management Practices (BMP~) that ,,hall be u,,ed oft- site to reduce pollutants during .constructioo activities'entering .the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical~ 2. An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, Included In the Grading Plan, Implemented for the proposed project that Identifies specific meaauraa to control dh-Sits' and off-,,Its erosion from the time of ground disturbing activltlea ara Initiated through comptatlori of grading. This Erosion Control Plan ,,hall Include the following measure`' at a minimum: a) specify the .timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced In southern · California, and b) An In,,pection and malntenanca program ,,hall be Included'to ensure that any ero,,ion which doe`' occur either on-site or off-site a,, a ra,,ult of this project will be corrected through a remedlation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3. During construction, temporary berm" such as sandbags Or-gravel dikea must , be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when thera I$ rainfall or other runoff. '" Initial Study for . City of Rancho CUcamonga DRC2003-01.130- Page 15 4. During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning'Will be performed prier to storm events and after the use of water trucks to. control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the alta.. Post- Construction Operational: S. The dele oper s~ali Implement' the BMEs Identified In the Watol~ Quality .' Management Plan (WQMP). prepared by RMA on February 21, 200S, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent praottoal.. Landscaplng Plans shall Include provisions for contr°lllng and minimizing the use of fertillzerslpesflcides/herblclde$, Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, Including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be Submitted to the City for rsvtaw and approval prior to the IssUance of Grading Permlto. b} According to CVWD, 43 p~rcent of the City's water is'~currenflY provided from ground water In the Cucamonga and Chino Basins. CVWD has' adopted, a master plan that estimates demand needs until the year 2030... The proposed, project will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will It interfere With recharge because it is not within an area' designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan· Exhibit IV-2. The' development of the site will require the grading of the site and excavatiOn; ho. waver, would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 288 to 470 feat' below the ground surface. As noted In the General Plan FEIR (Seciion 5.9), continued development citywlde will increase'water needs and Is a.significant impact; however, CVVVD has plans to meat this Increased need through the construction of future water facilitY,. c) The project will Cause-changes' In absorption rates, drainage paflems, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows.. The proJeot design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosIon. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer pdor to Issuance of Grading Permits. Therefore, the project will not result In substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site. The Impact is not considered significant. d) The project will cause changes In absorption rates, drainage paflems, and the rate and" ' amount of surface water runoff bebause of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, the project will not alter Ihs course of any stream or river. Ail · . runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities; which have been designed to handle' the flows. 'A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of Grading Permits. Therefore, increase In runoff fTom the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. No Impacts are entlcJpa~ed. . . The project will cause changes In absorption rat~S,, drainage paffems, 'and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the ~mount of new building and hardscape. proposed on a site; however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows.. The project will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff.' A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of Grading Permits. Therefore, Increase ' in runoff from the site will not result In flooding on- or off-slta. No Impacts are ariflcipated. ' 0 Grading actlvitles associated with the construction period could result In a temporary increase In th~ amount of Suspended solids in surface flows dudng a conmsrront storm event, thus Initial·study for ' city of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-01130 . ~ Page 16 resulting'In surfaco water quality impacts, The site is for new deveopment or significant redevelopment; therefore, s required to comply with the NPDES to minimize water pollution.' The following mitigation measures shall be implemented: · 7. Prior to Issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a WQMP, Including a project description and Identifying · BMPs that Wlti be used an-sits to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable.· The WQMP shall Identify the structural and · non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga In June 2004. 8. Prior to Issuance of Grading or Paving Permits, the applicant shall 0btaln a Notice of Intent (NOI) to Comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Eflmlnatlon System (NPDES) General Consbuctlon Storm Water Permit fi:om the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger'a Identification Number) · shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDE~. General Construction Permit. g) No housing units are proposed with this project. No adverse Impacts are expected. h) The project site Is not located within a 100-year flood hazard ama according to Genera! Plan Exhibit V-5. No adverse impacts are expected. I) The Rancho 'Cucarnonga ama IS flood p~otected, by an extanslve storm draib system designed to convey a 100-year storm event. The system Is substantially Improved and · provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows. This existing system Includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-fined · channels, and unde~gi:ound storm drains as shown in General Plan Exhibit V-6. The Project · site Is not. located within a '100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5.. No adverse Impala am expectS. J) There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the project site; therefore, Impacts from Selche and tsunami are not anticipated. The Rancho Cucamonga area .s. its at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams. Numerous man-made controls have bean constructed to reduce the mudflow Impacts to the " · level of non-signlficanco within the City. This existing System Includes several debris dama and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City. g. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project:, . .( ) ( ) ( ) · a) physically divide an estabflshed community? b) Conflict'with any applicable land.uea plan, policy, or ( ) ( ) .( ) (v') . regulation' of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? · · c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation ( ) ( ) ( ). (v') · plan or natural community conservation plpn? ' Comments.' .. · a) The site is located on the north side of Base Lthe Road, east of Day. Creek Flood Control Channel within the Edison power line corridor and is characterized by a mb( of residential, utility, and institutional development to the north, south, east, and west. This Project will be of Initial Study for citY of Rancho Cucamonga · Page 17 DRC2003-O1130 .. , · utility, and institutional development to the north, south, east, and west~ This project will be of similar design and size to surrounding development. The project will become a part of the · larger community. No adverse imPacts are anticipated.. . '. r= b) The project site land'use designation is Flood control/Utility Corridor. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection. As such,.nO Impacts ara anticipated. . c) The project Site is not located within any habitat conservation Or natural community plan araa. · According to the General Plan Exhibit .IV-3, and Section 5.3 of the General Plan· FEIR, the project site Is not w th n an area of sensitive biologiCal resources; therafora, development will · - not adversely affect tara or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that, the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. · 10. MiNERAl. RESOURCES. Wouldtheprojecb () () () (v'). · a) Result in the loss of availab~tity of a known mineral · rasource that would be of value to the region and the res;~e~s of the State? , . b) ' Result in the loss of availability of 'a locally () () ( ) (/) .... Important mineral resource racovery site delineated . on a local general plan, specific plan or other land . use plan? :' ' a)' The see is not designated as a State Aggregate' Resources Area according to 'the City General Plan, Figure IV71 and Table IV-I; therefore, there Is no ImpacL b) The site Is r~ot designated by the General Ptan~ Figure IV-I and Table IV-I, as a Valuable mineral resource recovery site; therafore, thera Is no Impact. · · ~. 'OtS~. Wou/d~proj~resu/t/~: () () () ('3 a) Exposure of persons to 'or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established In the ., local general plan or noise ordlnarme, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or gene~a{;oi~ of excessive ( ) ( ) ( ) ground Ix)me vibration, or ground borne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent 'increase In ambient noise ( ) ( ) . ( ) (v') levels In the project vicinity above levels existing . without the project? d) A sUbstantial temporary or periodic' increase. In . () (`3 () ' ( )'' ambient noise levels In the projeqt vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located Within an airp~ land use plan ( ) ( ) ( ) or, where sucha plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use alq3orf., would the project expose people ·residing or working In the project area to excessive noise levelS? -. ": '2/f · Initial Study for · city of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-01130 : ·. Page 18 I f) · For a project within the vicinity of a private airs~p. J ( ) I ( ) I ( ) ('/) would the project expose people residing ;or~ ' *~ I ~ · working in the project area to excessive rlolse J . J J I comment~· a) The project site Is Within an area of noise levels exceeding. City standards according to General Plan Exhibit V-13 at build-out because of traffic noise along Sase Line Road; however,· the proposed public storage use would·not provide long-term exposure .to noise levels. No adverse impact Is expected. · b) . The uses associated with this typa of project normally'do not induce ground Ix)me vibratlons~ As such, no impacts ara anticipated. · c) The pdmary.source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga Is traffic. The prOposed activities will not slgniflcaJ~tty Increase traffio; hence, are not anticipated to increase the ambient noise levels.with!n the vicinity'of'the project. · d) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5.7) Indicates that during a construction phase, On-site · . stationary sources, .heavy-duty construction vehicleS, and- construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding City standards. The following measures are provided to mitigate · . the short, term noise Impacts: · .'¶) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 P.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, Including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. ' 2) . Construction o~' grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified In Development Code Section 17.02.12043, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly notae level monlterlng as specified. In Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be requtred by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Offic'lal within 24 hours; however, If noise levels exceed'the above standards, then the consultant shall Immediately notify the Planning Department. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction aotlvltles shall be reduced In Intensity t° a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. , 3) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed aS early as possible In first phase., The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbahce created by on-site construction equipment; however, do not address the potential ImPacts because of the transport of construction materials and debris.. The following mltigation'mea.surea shall then be required: 4) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, Including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally; If heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 dally trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Noise Mitigation:Plan denoting any construction trafflo haul routes. To the extent feasible, the Plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive ' land uses or residenttal dwellings. .. Initial Study for : City of Rancho Cucampnga DRC2003-01130 Page lg e) The. site Is not located Within an airPort land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The site is located approximately 3 miles northerly of the ontar o Airpor~ end is offset north.of the flight path. No Impact is anticipated. f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable AirPort, is located approximately 2 ~ m0es to the west of the City's westady limits. No impact is anticipated. · 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: ( ) ( ) '( )i '(,') a) ' Induce substantial population growih in an area either directly (for example, by proposing new · · homes and businesses) or Indirectly (for example, through extension of roads Or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing,. ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? · ' c) .Displaca substantial ' numbers of people, ( ) ( ) · ( ) ('") necessitating .the' conslruction of replacement housing elsewhere? ' I a) The project is located In a predominantly developed area and will not 'Induce population groWth. Conslructlon activities, at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area. Or'ca constructed, the proposed project will have a limited number of employees; hence, will not create a demand for additional housing as a majority of the employees will likely be hired from within the City or surrounding communities. NO Impacts ~ ere antldpeted. b) The project site contains no existing housing units. No adverse Impact expected. e) The project site I$ vacant land. No Impacts are anticipated. · 13. PUBLIC SERVICES, Would the projeof result In .. · .. substantial adverse phYSical impacts associated with the provision of new or physioal~y altered governnrnenfal · fac~Tlties, need for new or physically altered govemrnental · facSlties, the construction of which COUld cause significant " environmental irnpacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance ( ) ( ) () (,,,) objecgves for any of the public services: . a) Fire protection? b) .. Police protection?. () : ( ) ( ) (v') · c) Schools? ( ) ' ( ) ( ) ('/). d) Parks? ( ) ( ) ( ) . (v') e) Other public facilities? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') ~ ' . a) The *s~te Is located on the north Side of Base Line Road, east Of Day creek Flood Conbol Channel within the Edison· power line corridor, would be sewed by a fire station .located · approximately ½ mile from the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the' need to construct new facilities. Standard conditions of Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-01130 .. · Page 20 approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the project so no impacts to fire services will occur. No impacts ara anticipated. ' b) . Additional police protection .Is not required as the addition of the project will not:change, the · pattern .of uses within the' surrounding area and will not have a substantial. Increase In property to be Patrolled as the project site is within an araa that is ragularty patrolled,' c) The site Is In a develqped area currently served by the Etiwanda School .District and the · Chaffey Joint Union· High School District, The project will be r6quired to pay School Fees as · prescribed by State law prior to the Issuance of building permits. No ImPacts are anticiPated, d) ' The site is In'a.deveioped area, cun'entiy served by the city of Rancho Cueameaga, The nearest park Is located ~ mile from th.e project site, The project will not require the construction of any new facilities Or alleration of any existing facilities or cause a decline In the levels of service, which could cause the need to censtruct new facilltiea, No Imp.acts ara anticipated. · · . e) The proPOsed proJecJ'will utilize existing public facilit!as, The site is in a developed ama, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucemonga, The project will .not rsqulro ,the. construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a deCline .In the levels of sen4cei which could cause the need to construct new facilities, . Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamoega will Increase demand for library servlcas, According. . . · . to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.9.9), the. projected increase In library space under the General Plan will not meet the projected demand, The' General Plan FEIR Identified the cumulative impact on library services as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of .Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council, The · proposed project Is consistent with the General, Plan for which the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared and impacts evaluated. Since the adoption of the General Plan, ' the city has planned a new library within the Victoria Gardens regional shopping center of .approximately 22,000 square feet, which ts In excess of the projected need of 15,500 square feet at build-out of the City. · '14.' RECREATION.. Would the pr°jed: () () '() (~) a),' Increase the use of existing neighborh°°d. .and · regional parks or other.resraationel facilities such · '- that substantial physical deterloratidn of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b)'' Does the project include recreational facilities or () ( ) () . (v') require the constructloo or expansion of recreational facilltias, which might have .an adverse physical effect on the environment? a) The site is in a developed area, currantiy served by the City of Rancho Cueamooga. The nearest park, Ellena Park, Is located .47 mile from the project site. This project Is not · proposing any new housing or large employment generator that would cause an Increase In the use of parks or other recreational facilities. No impacts are anticipated. b) See a) rasponea above. init al study for ' City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-01130 Page 2! 'IS. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Wouldtheprojec~, () () . () (v'). a) Cause an increase In traffic, which.is substantial in relation tO the existing traffic load and capacity of the street System. (i.e., result In a substantial increase In eilher the. number of vehicle trips, the · volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at ~ , intemectlons)? · , b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') of servica standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated .. roads or highways? c) Result In a change in air traffic patterns; including ( ) ( ) . ( ). .(v') either an increase 'in traffic levels or a change In : location that results In substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase h~Tnrds due to a design () .() . () feature (e.g., 'sharp' curves or dangerous Intamections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? (.) ( ) { ) (v') f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs ( ). () supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, blc~le racks)? ' ~ .. a)' The'proposed project Includes the development of outdoor RV parking, slx storage buildings totaling 71,175 square feet and a management office of approximately 1,430 square feet. The Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model estimates that the total uses will generate .48 trips daily. As noted In the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.5), continued development will cunblbute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area. The proposed proje~ is consistent with the-General plan for which the FEIR was prepared, and Impacts evaluated. The project is in an area that Is mostly developed with street Improvements existing or Included In project design. The proJect will not create a substantial Increase In the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume, or congestion at intersections. The project site will be required to provide street Improvements (curb, guffer, and sidewalk) along lhe street frontage of the site .per City roadway standards. In addition,· the City has established e Transportation Development Fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits. Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic · circulation. No Impacts are anticipated. b) The project Will generate 12 two-way peak hour trips, which is less than 250 two-way peak hour trips for non-retail; therefore, is below the threshold of the San. Bemardlno Congestion Management Plan (CMP) criteria for requiring a traffic impact analysis. The project is In an area that Is mostly developed with all street Impmvementa existing. The' project will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adjacent arterials. The project will be required to provide street Improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage . of the site. No Impacts are anticipated. ·. o) Located approximately 3 miles northerly of the Ontario AjrP°rt. the site is Offset north of the flight path and will·not change air traffic pattems. No impacts are anticipated d) The project Is In an area that is mostly developed. The project will b~ reqdlred to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street, frontage of the site. The project design does not Include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming 'uses. Initial Study i;or~ . . . City of Rancho CuCamonga DRC2003-O1 !30 '." ' Page 22 The projeCt will,· therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards becafiea of a design feature. N0 imPacts are anticipated. ' ; · . e) The 'projeCt will be designed to'Provide access for all' ernergency Vehlcles and will, therefore, · . not create an inadequate emergency access. No impacts are anticipated. 0 The project design has adequate parking in C°mplianc~ with standards of the RanCho. Cucamonga Development Cede and .will,"therafore, not create an Inadequate parking capacity.' No impacts are anticipated. :. : 'g) . .The project design Includes, orthe project Will be conditioned to provide, features supporting :~nsportation and vehicle trip reduction (e.g., bus bays, bicycle recks, carpool parking, etc.), 1~. ~:'~ILITIES AND ·SERVICE ·SYSTEMS. Wou/d tt~e () () I. (.) . (v') · proje~ · · a)' .Exceed Wastawater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water ©,~111~ Control Board? · b) Require or result in the construction of new water ( ) ( ) ( ) . · or wastewatar trealment facilities or expansion of; .- · existing facilities, the construction of whiCh could _,:~_-_~e significant environmental effects? ~' · · c) Require or result in the conslruction' of new --;.on ( ) .( ) (:). water drainage [acHitlse or.expansion of .eXisting . fa;cilifies, the construction Of which .could cause ' ~ significant environmental effects.? d). · Have sufficient water supplies available to serve () · ( ) () the project from existing entitlements and resoumeS, or ara new or expanded entitlements needed? · e) .Result In a determination by the wa~;ewater (). () () (v') ~eatment provider, which serves or may serve the project, that It has adequate capacity to serve the project's prejected demand In addition to the provider's existing commitments? '* ' 0 Be, served by a landfill wtih sufficient permitte~:l. () capacity to accommodate the preject'$ solid waste disposal needs? .. g) · Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and ( ) ( ). ( ) (v') regulations related to solid waste?. · a) The proposed project Is sewed by:the CVWD Sewer system, which has'waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment Plant 'located within Rancho' cucamonga. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Aha Regional Water.Quality Con?ol Board reg.ardlng wastewater. No Impacts are anticipated. b) The' proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer sYStem, whiCh, has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-I located Within City Of Ontario, neither of whiCh are at capacity..The project is required to meet the requlrementa of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No Impacts ara anticipated. : . '" o)'. All runoff will be conVeyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to · . handle the flows. A Grading a[~d Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official '. " " C!ty of Rancho Cucamonga Initial' Study for' · DRC2003-01130 .. Page 23 and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits.' The impact is not considered signiflcanL. d). ' The prOject is served by the CVWD water system. Them Is currently a sufficient water supply · available to the City of'Rancho Cucam0nga to serve this project..No impacts are anticipated. e) ';The proposed project is served by the cVWD Sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP:t located within City of Ontado, neither of which are at capacity. No impacts am anticlpated~ ' · 0 Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current Clt~ cuntracte;d hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with ~uffi~ent capacity to handle the City's solid waste disPosal g) This ProJec~t complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste. The City of Rancho Cucamonga COntinues to implement.waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939. Therefore, no Impacts..are anticipated. · . ¶7. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE () () .() (v') a) Does the project have the pOtential to degrade the quality of the environment, ~ubstantlally reduce the ' · ; habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or · wildlife' population to .drop below serf-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce Ihe number or restrict the range of a mm or endangered plant or animal, or · eim hate mportant examples of the ·major periods · of California history or prehlstory? b) Does the project have impacts that ara individually ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')' 'limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively COnsiderable' means that' the · Incremental effects of a project are considerable · when viewed In COnnection with the effects of past prOjects, the effects of other current prOjects, and the effects of probable futUre prO,iects)? · . (=) Does the project have environmental effects that ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') will Cause substantial adverse effects on human beings~ either dlractb/or Indiredfy? · a) The site Is not located In an area of sensitive biolOgical'resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Exhibit IV-3. Additionally, the area .surwunding the site is · developed. Based on previous development and street imprOvements, it is unlikely that any. endangered or rare spoctes*Would inhabit the site. b) If the prOposed project were apprOved, then the applicant would be required'to develop :the · sl~e in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The 2001 General Plan was adopted along with the Certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fac~ and a. . Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse envirOnmental effects of build- out In the City and Sphere-of-influence. The City made findings that adoption of the 'General · Plan would result in significant adverse effects to aggregate resources, p~lme farmland, elf' quality, the acoustical envirOnment, library services, and aesthetics, and visual resources· Mitlgatk~n measures were adopted for each of these resources; however, they.would not Initial Study for :,.. ~ . City of Rancho Cucamonga. DRC2003-0i130;/ ' .. Page 24 reduCe impacts to less-than-significanl levels; As such. the. City adopted a Statement of O~,erridii~g Considerations balancing the benefits of development ·under the General Plan Update:egainst thk significant unavoidable adverse'impacts (CEQA .Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)). These benefits include less overal traffic volumes by developing mb<ed-use projects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation, of valuable natural open space. With these' findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no furlher discussion or evaluationbf cumulative impacts Is requlrad.- D~velopment of the site under the pmpesed land use change' would not cause substantial · adverse effects On human beings, either directly or indirectly, i The Initial Study .Identifies . constmCti0n-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant Impact. Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels. Additionally, impacts resulting~from air quality would be short-term and would cease onCe construction activities were completed. The Initial Stbdy identified potentially significant Impacts associated with the exposure of people to Increased noise levels. Mitigation measures contained In thIs Initial Study will en~ure, impacts ars at less.than-significant levels. . · EARLIER ANALYSES . F. adler analyses may be' used where, pursuant to the tiering, program Ell=,. or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative.. Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The. effects identified above for this project were-within the scope of and adequately analyz~l In the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects .were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were Utilized In completing this Initial Study and are available for review In the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Department offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply): Oo ,=. ov (~) ' Biological Assessment (E~ol Ical $clen , N ember 24, 002) FEiR '. General Plan ' - (SCH~2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) ' (v')Master Environmental Assessment fOr the 'i989 General Plan Update (scH #88020115,. Certified January 4, 1989) (~) victoria Planned Community EIR (Cerb'fled May20, 1981) " .. . . Initial Study for . City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-01130 Page 25 APPLICANT CERTIFIcATIoN " I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknOWledge that I have road this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate Ihe effects to a point where,Cie.arly no. si~zifi~nt environmental effects would occur.. . Prepared By: ~-~.-"~'~/~'~ '~ - . Date: Print Name and Tille: r ~J~ \(',~ ~ [:~t__ 0'~-~) L/'~"J 0 L-A- I-.t ~"~ City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The folloWing Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 2~09f and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No;: Development Code Amendment DRC2003-01 i44 and ConditiOnal Use Permit DRC2003-01130 Public Review Period Closes: April 13, 2005 Project Name: Project Applicant:. 8outhem California Edison Company Project Location (also see attached map): North side of Base Uce Road. east of DaY Creek Rood C°nbol Channel within the Edison power line corridor-APN:. 1089-031-12. Project Description: A request to amend Developmen~ Code section 17.16.030 to change the Utility Corridor District use regulations to allow public storage facilities including outdoor RV parking and a request for a public storage facility on 5.38 acres in the Utility Corridor District, along with outdoor RV parking, six storage buildings totaling 71,175 square feet, and a management office of approximately 1,430 square feet to be located on the north side of Base Line Road, east of Day Creek Flood Control Channel within the Edison 'power line .corridor. Related files: Tree ·Removal Permit DRC2004-00847 and Prelimlnal7 Review DRC2002-00704. ' · FINDING This Is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead' agency, has conducted a'n Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and la proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: I-] The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the' project may.have a s!gnlflcant effect on the .environment. [] The Initial Study identified potentially.significant effects but: (1) Revisions in the project ·plans· or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before Ibis proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where cleady no significant effects would occur, and (2) There Is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project as revised may have a significant effect on the environment. · . If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impaot Report will not be required. Reasons to support this finding are Included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE' The public is Invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period. Date of Determination Adopted By RESOLUTION NO. 05-26 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVALOF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2003-01144, TO AMEND SECTION 17.16.030 USE REGULATIONS TO ALLOW PUBLIC STORAGE FACILITIES, INCLUDING OUTDOOR RV PARKING, IN THE UTILITY CORRIDOR DISTRICT? AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. · 1. · The City of Rancho cuCamonga filed'an application for Development Code Amendment " DRC2003-01144, as' described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, .the subject Development code Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 13th day of Apdl 2005, the Planning commission of the City of RanCho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said headng on that date. : ' · · 3. . All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this ResolUtion have occurred. B. Res01utio~j. · ' NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning commission. of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that al! of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this commission during the above~ referenced public hearing on Apdl 13, 2005, including wriffen and oral staff reports, together with pub c testimony this commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property loCated within the City;, and. b. The proposed amendment will not have a significant impact on the environment. ~. Based upon the substantial evidence Presented to this commission dudng the above- refere'nced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this commission hereby finds and concludes as. follows: a. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan · and will provide for development,, within the district, in a manner consistent, with. the. General Plan and with related development; and b. . This amendment does promote the goals and Objectives of the Development Code; arid c~ The proposed amendment will 'not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to' properties Or improvements in the vicinity;, and · . d. The subject application is consistent 'with the objectives the Development Code; and . PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-28 DRC2003-01144 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA April 13, 2005 ' · · - Page 2 e. The proposed amendment is in COnformance with the General Plan. 4; Based upon the facts and informatio~ COntained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a Significant effect upon the environment and recommends the City Council adopt, the' · M tigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and inCOrporated herein by' this reference, ·based upon the findings as follows: · . a. That the Mitigated Negative Deciaration has been prepared id COmpliance With the ·CallfOmia Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder,.that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this · Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative, Declaration With regard.to the application. b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will resUlt if the project is approved, all significant effects will be reduced to a less than significant level by imposition of mitigation measures on the component of the project that Involves development approval for a public storage use on a specific site and by the imposition of site specific mitigation measures as applications for self-storage facilities are approved in the future. · c. Pursuant fo'the provisions Of Section 753.5(c) of Titie 14 of the California Code of · Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the reCOrd as a whole~ the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative· DeclaratiOn for the. project, there is~no evidence that the proposed project Will have potential for an adverse impact upon Wildlife resources orthe habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon.the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of T'~e 14 0fthe Califomia Code of Regulations. 5.. Based upon the findings and COnclusions set forth in Paragraphs .1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of Development Code Amendment DRC2003-01144 by the adoption of the attached City Council Ordinance. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this ResolUtion. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF APRIL 2005. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHo CUCAMONGA BY: Rich Macias, Chairman ATTEST: · Brad Bullet, Secreta~, · pLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-26 DRC2003-01144 - CITY OF RANCHO.CUCAMONGA April 13, 2005 Page 3 I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and r~gularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the · Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of April 2005, by the fo owing vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: o ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANcHo. CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,' APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2003-01144, A REQUEST TO AMEND SECTION 17.'i6.030 USE REGULATIONS TO ALLOW PUBLIC: STORAGE FACILITIES, INCLUDING OUTDOOR RV PARKING, IN THE UTILITY CORRIDOR DISTRICT, AND MAKING ' FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. ' Recitals. 1. On April 13, 2005, the Planning .commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing with respect to the above referenced DRC2003-01144 and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted its Resolution No.' 05-**, recommending that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt said Development Code Amendment. 2; On *****, 2005, the City Council of the.city of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly .noticed public hearing on the Development Code Amendment. 3. .Ail legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance..' . The City council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows: ~: This.City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the . Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. ' · SECTION 2: Based.upon substantial evidence presented to the City council during the above-referenced public hearing on ~*~, 2005, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, the City council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. ' The application aPplies to properly located within the City; and b. The proposed amendment will .not have a significant impact on the environment. C. This amendment does not conflict ~th the Land Use Policies of the General ' Plan and will provide for development, within .the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related develoPment; and d. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the ·Development Code; and e. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and · SECTION :3: Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. ' ~ DRC2003-01144 ' CI'i~. OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Page 2 assessment for the application, the City' Coundl finds 'that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring 'Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the state CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder;, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the City Council; and, further, th s City Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. Although the .Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects will be reduced .to a less than significant level by imposition of mitigation measures on the component of the project that involves development approval for a public storage Use on a specifiC site and by the'imposition of site specific mitigation, measures as applications for self-storage facilities are approved in the future.. ~ c.. pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title ;14 of the California Code ' of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Project, there is no evidence that the proposed proJect will have potential for an adverse'impact upon wildlife resources or the. habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated · Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council during the public hearing, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. SECTION 3: The ~:Jty of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code is hereby amended to change SECTION 17.!6.030, In words and figures, as shown in the attached Exhibit"A.' SECTION 4: If .any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Ordinance is, for any reason, deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, or preempted .by legislative enactment, such decision or legislation shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City · Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or words thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, clauses, phrases, ..or words might subsequently be declared invalid or.unconstitutional or preempted by subsequent legislation. SECT ON 6.: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall Cause the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley · Daily Bulletin,' a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, CalIfomia, and · cirCUlated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga',. California. · EXHIBIT A (DRC2003-01144) OF CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. i7.16.030 Use regulations. Uses listed in Table 17.16.030(A) shall be allowable in one or more of the open space districts as indicated in the co umns beneath each district. Where indicated with the letter "P,' the use shall be a permitted use in that districL Where indicated with the letter 'C,'-the use shall be a conditional use subject to the conditional usa permit process. In the event there is difficulty in categorizing a " · given use in one of the disfficts, the procedure outlined in Section 17.02.040 use determination' · shall be followed. All uses are subject to the development review process as described in Chapter 17.06. The city planner may approve accessory uses and structures, .and agricultural uses · involving no improvements, under the minor development mview process. Table 17. i6.030(A) USE REGULATIONS FOR OPEN SPACE DISTRICTS I 1. Single-family dwellings (not to exceed an average density' of ! .Unit pe[ 40 acres): P -' - I 2. Caretaker quarters: . ...... ii ii I I .. a- . Permane,t. · P '1 . P P .I.. b. Temporary ...... : . C.. '1 C C I 3. Home occupations: . P I. - - carports, cabanas, guest houses, bams, storage sheds, .. corrals): ' " J a~. ~Related to on-site sing!e-fa~ily:dwe!l!ng ....... . P I..T' . - :l . b. Not related to on-site dwelling p. - ' '1 5. Agricuttuml uses:. .. I: · . a... Row crops, truck gardens P... J P J P · 1 b. Plant'storage or pr0Pag~fl, on P' I .. P '1 P . C.. Orchards, vineyards, Christmas and other tme J farms P P · P d. Community gardens · . P J P J P e. Greenhouses P · 'l P I P f. Livestock grazing, breeding (no feed'lots) · P I P ;[ ' P g. Hydroponic CUlture ' P I P I P ' h." On-site sales of products grown on site · P. I P ' I P 6. Cemeteries, crematories, mausoleums, columbariums, and related uses: C - -. 7. Wildlife preserves and sanctuaries: r P P P 8. Forest maintenance facilities/ranger station: I ' P I P I P 9. Recreat[onaluses: J . I a. Parks, picnic areas, playgrounds ' J P I P [ P b. Hiking, biking, equestrian trails I P' J P ' I P C..' Greenways I ' P I P "[ P EXHIBIT A (DRC2003-01144) OF CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. I ~ .d..G°E._c°urs,es. ........ I C . I C I C · J e. Riding scho__o.Is (e~uestrian) ~ :. J C. :1 C I ' c I 'f*' Commerclal. stablea .... '1 C :1 C I · C :1 . g- C~untry.clHb.and m!at~c~ ~s~_~... * *1 c I. c I. c . i 10. Preservation and use of historic landmarks and related I. ' I.. uses such as museums art galleries, and food services · ...t° ac~omm0date 0nTsi!e u~es~ . J PC J .c : ';. I 11. Floodcontr0!s~b~J_.clureSandfacl!it!es: I' _ 'J. P J12. Light vehicle parking and storage in ames'substantially ~;~rm~nded by !nd~sld~,.uses!~ , . . ' .. i . c · I 13:' Ufi!it~s~.bstat~ions(re!ated.eqU!l~mentana.~lqJclures): .. . C ' I. C" ! . ;.C,..J . :1 14. Public Storage and Recreational Vehicles` ] . . . I :J C1' I ' p =Permitted Use C = Conditional Use Permit required (Ord. 211 § 6 (part), 1983) Not permitted Within the Etiwanda North Specific Plan Area. . DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT· DRC2003-01144 " SUBJECT PROPERTIES · 300 FT NOTICE DRC2003-01144 RESOLUTION NO. 05-27 .. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003-01130 FOR A PUBLIC STORAGE FACILITY INCLUDING · RV STORAGE ON 5.38 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF. BASE LINE ROAD, EAST OF DAY CREEK FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL WITHIN THE EDISON POWER ·LINE CORRIDOR, IN THE UTILITY CORRIDOR DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF- APN: 1089-031-12. A. ' Recitals. 1. Southern California Edison filed an application for the issuance of Cond'~ional Use Permit DRC2003-01130, as described in the title of this Resolution.' Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On' the 13th day of APril 2005, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing " on that date. 31' All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occun'ed. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved bythe Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. · This commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, · Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the'substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- mferencad public hearing on April 13, 2005, including written and omi staff reports, together with pubJic testimony, this commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. ' The application applies.4o a 5.38 acre properly located on the north side of Base Une ROad, east of Day Creek Flood Control Chahnel, within the Edison power line corridor with' a street frontage of 277 feet and Iot depth of 859 feet, and which was previously used as a Plant nuree~ and ' b. The property to the north of the subject site is additional Utility corridor;, the property to the south consists of Base Une Road and Utility Corridor;,~ the property to the east is San Bemardino County Maintenance Building, a tempora~ Fire Station, and household waste cente~, and the property to the west is Day Creek Flood Control Channel and Utility corridor;, and The application proposes construction of six buildings totaling 71,175 square feet, plus a manager's office. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-27 DRC2003-01130 - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON April 13, 2005 Page 2 a. The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of. the. Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. b; The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to pmporties or improvements in the vicinity. c. The proposed use complies with each of the appiicable provisions of the · Development Code. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Deciarefion and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated hereiq by this mferenca, based upon the · findings as follows: e. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the Califomia Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder;, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the. Planning commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. .Although the Mitigated. Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to a level that is less than significant by the imposition of mitigation measures on the component of the project that involves development approval for a public storage use on a specific site. The site-specific mitigation measures imposed on the development approved with this project are listed below as conditions of approval. · · c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of T~e 14 of the Califomia Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the proJect, there is no evidence that the proposed proJect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the 'substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California code of Regulations. 5: Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. PlanninR Departmerlt 1) Along the perimeter Walls, provide vine pocket openings sufficient to .allow for coverage of the exterior wall surface to minimize potential graffiti. pLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-27 DRC2003-01130 -SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON April 13, 2005. Page 3 2) All graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. : 3) The approval of this appliCation is contingent upon City Council approval of Development Code Amendment DRC2003-01144. En~3ineerinl3 Del~artment !) Base Line Road shall 'be improved in accordance with City "Major Divided Arterial Street" standards as required and including: a) Protect existing curb and gutter, as required. b) Provide curvilinear sidewalk, 9500 Lumens HPSV streeflights, and street trees. c) Protect existing'R26(s) signs along Base Une Road or replace as required. d~ The main ddveway of the project shall be a right-tum in and right-tum out only and shall be the commercial type per City Standard 101, Type C. e) No median opening will be permitted on Base Erie Road. 2) The existing overhead Utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 kV electriCal) on the project side of Base Line Road shall be undergrounded from the first pole off-sita east of the easterly boundarY to the first pole off-site west of the Day Creek Channel, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. All services crossing Base Line Road shall be undergrounded at the same fim~. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development as it o ,cc?s on the opposite side of the street. If the developer fails to submit said reimbursement within 6 months of · ' the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. 3) The existing Base Une Road median shall be landscaped from the existing, landscaped portion of the median (constructed under Tract 1605'1) up to the median nose fronting the project, per City Standards, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for median landsCaping from future development as it occurs on the. opposite side of the street. If the developer fails to submit said· reimbursement agreement within six months of the impmvernents being accepted by the city, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. 4} The e~ergency access shall be a limited access curb per City Standard 105-C. Remove the proposed drive approach. The area between the PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-27 DRC2003-01130 ~ SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON April 13, 2005 Page 4 access curb and the curvilinear sidewalk shall be mckscaped and the material tobe installed in the area between the sidewalk and the property line shall be determined during plan check. 5) Additional parkway landscape easement shall be required for the Base Line Road Beautification Master Plan. 6). Within the Landscape Maintenance District (LMD) area, landscaping shall be installed according to current City .standards, similar to the landscaping installed with Tract 16051 to the west. 7)'Conduit for a future fiber optic cable link shall be installed within the parkWay to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 8) Orange Empire Acres Map Book 20/1 dedicated an alley and Railroad Avenue South adjacent to this property. Process a stree~ vacetion and incorporate the land within this developmenL 9) Provide a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, and identify applicable Best Management Practices (BMPs) on the grading plan.· Environmental Mitiaation Air Quardy 1) All construction equipment'shall be maintained' In good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being prepedy serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications.. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any' Grading Permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the C~ty denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that IoW'emission mobile construction equipment .will be utilized, or that their use Was investigated and fOund to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management Dtsfltct (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. · 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or' exceed performance standards' noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, IOW-pressure spray. 4)All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in $CAQMD Rule 1108. .5) All construction equipment Shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and . 403. Additionally, contractors shall inciude the following provisions: pLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-27 DRC2003-01130 - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON April 13, 2005 Page 5 · Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. · Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. · Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to ' . erosion over extended periods of time.' · Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. · Dispose of surplus excavated material in aCCOrdance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. · Sweep streets according tO a schedule'established bY the City if · silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a . result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. · SusPend'grading operations during high winds (i.el, wind speeds exceeding 25mph) in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements. · Maintain a minimum 24-inch freebOard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means.: 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent :. (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB])'daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM~o) emissions in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical Soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be , applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PMto emissions. · 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative ruer- powered equipment where feas!ble. · 9) The construction contractor Shall ensure that constn~ction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut .off equipment when not in use. '10) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). 11) Ail industrial and com'mercial' facilities shall .designate preferential parking for vanpools. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-27 DRC2003-01130 -SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON; Apdl 13, 2005 Page 6 ' · ' 12) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall .be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. 13) All .industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the' Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. 14).' All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high efficiency/Iow polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 15) Ail residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripPing. Cultural Resourca~ 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist tO' monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the.assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: · Enact intedm measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition Or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value, · Consider establishing previsions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their spocial qualifies as a theme or focal point.. · Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage. · Propose mitigation measures, and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. e Prepare a technical resources management report, doCUmenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project.area. Submit one coPY of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bemardino County Archaeological Information .Center for permanent arohiving. 2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preCOnstruction field survey of the project site. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 0527 DRC2003-01130 - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON April 13, 2O05 Page 7 ' Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the Program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: · · Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to all°w the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. · Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the.monitor of the find. · Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer.collected specimens with a copy of the report to the San Bemardino County Museum. Geology and Soils 1) The. site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions associated with' vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. · 3)Grading operations shall be suspended 'when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4). chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and' RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for g6 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions. Hydrology and'Water Quality ' . . · 1) Prior to'issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit t° Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan· (SWPPP) specifically identifying. Best Management Practices (BMPs) - ' that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2)' An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time of ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a pLANNING COMMISSIONRESOLUTION NO. 05-27 DRC2003-01130 - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON Apd113,2005 Page 8 minimum: a) specifythe timing of grading and construction to minimize * · ' soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shal! be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result o~.. this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. . ~ 3) Dudng construction, temporary berms such .as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge ~f debris or sediment fi'om the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During .construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the water Quality' Management Plan 0NQMP) prepared by RMA on Februmy 21, 2005, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 6) Landscaping Plans shall include pmvisi0ns for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to. ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, · including monitoring previsions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of Grading Permits. . 7) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the . City Engineer for approval of a WQMP, including a project description. and idend~Ting BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall idenfif~ the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted .by · ' the City of Rancho Cucemonga in June 2004. 8) Prior to issuance of Grading or Paving Permits, .the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Const.ruction Storm Water Permit from the State Water. Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copyofthe' Waste Dischargers Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. PLANNIN~ coMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 0~27 DRC2003-01130 - SOUTHERN CALIFORN~ EDISON Apd113, 2005 Page 9 Noise 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or. at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. ' ' 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards 'specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weeldy noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building. Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately' notify the · .' Planning Department. Ifnoiselevels exceedthe above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. . 3) The perimeter bi0ck wall shall be COnstructed as early as possible in' the first phase.. 4) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation. plan denoting any construction traffic haul'routes. To the extent feasible; th.e plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive . land uses or residential dwellings.. 6. The Secretary to this Commission ~hali certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF APRIL 2005. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE.CITY OF R~NCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Rich Macias, Chairman ATTEST: " Brad Bullet, Secretary I, Bred Bulier, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucemonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning commission held on the 13th day of Apd12005, by the following vote-to-wit:. -'- pLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-27 DRC2003-01130 -SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON April 13, 2005 Page 10 AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING .. PROGRAM Project File Nos.'" DevelOpment Code Amendment DRC2003-01144 and Conditional Use permit DRC2003-01130 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMPi has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the (Mitigated Negative Declaration/Environmental Impact Rel~ort) for the · above-listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that' adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Pub c Resources Code)~ P'rogram Components - This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are ~ec(~rded with the acti°n and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of ApProval for the project. 2..A.procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each a~flon necessary. This procedure designates Who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be repOrted. . . 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused~ .yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to .compliance procedures, may be .necessary based .upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management - The MMP will bain place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled oUt correctly · and proper action is taken on each mitigation; Each City department shal! ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to thatdepartmenL Procedures - The following steps;will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. .. 1. A'fee covering ali costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred.by.the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be. charged to the applicant~ 2. A MMP Reporting 'Form will be prepared for each potentially significant .impact and its . corresponding m~t'gation*measure identified in the Mitigation· MonitoringChecklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and · to Whom and when compliance wi be reported. · AIl monitoring and reporting documentation will be 'kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing 'the' project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: . 'City Of R~ncho Cucamonga - Lead Agency .... · (Planning Department) · 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91730 Mitigation Monitoring Program DRC2003-01144 AND DRC2003-01.130 Page 2 · · 3~ Appropriate specialists, will be retained if technical ex ~erfise beyond the City staff'S iS needed,as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitOr specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate-written approvals to the project planner. ' 4. The' project 'Planner Or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the · completion of each action.item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After.each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase .developmenL , 5. All MMP Reporting Forms.for an impact issue requiring no furlfler monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. : . 6. Unanticipated Circumstances may arise requiring, the refinement or addition, of mitgatl°n measures. The project Planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additons. · An MMP Reporting Form will be completed bythe project planner or responsible Citydeparlment and a copy provided to the appropriate design~ co~struction, or operational Personnel. 7. The project planner o,r responsible City department has the. authority to Stop the work of. construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if complianCe with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible' City department has the authority to hold Issuance of a business license'until all mitigation measures ara implemented.. 8. Any conditions (mitigation)· that require monitoring after project completion shall be the respons bil ty of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Panning Division. The Division shall raquira the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the Cityto retain consultants and/or pay f0r City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation .measure for the required period of time. . 9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall Provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities'at the project site and'reporting the monitoring. results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan Shall- , conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Devalo, )ment Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. . m, ~ .~ ~u, MUNI IUI~JNG CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File NO.: DRC2003.01130 . .. AppliCant: .So,them Ed!s°n Calif°mla . Initial Study prepared by: Larry Henderson ' Date: February 22. 2005 .' ' ' All construction equ pment Shall be maintained.in good operating' COndition so as to reduce operational 2/4 emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment Is·being properly sorvlced and · · maintained as per manufacturers' specifications.. .. Maintenance records shall· be available at the COnstruction site for City verification. · or any Grading Permits, the' CP/BO' C developer shall submit construction plans to the City. Review of plane C denoting the proposed schedule and 'projected 2 equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide · evidence that Iow-emission mobile COnstruction '. equipment will be utilized, or that their use was .investigated and found to be Infeasible for the project. . Contractors shall also COnform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District ($CAQMD) as well as City Plannln._____g staff. ' All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Review of plans NC ~ '' performance standards noted In SCAQMD Rule 1t13. 2/4 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, Iow-prassura spray; · ' Allasphaltshallmeat°r~':~"--"d-P~'u,,,,~.-~ce6~,,&.d. BO B Revtawofptans NC noted In SCAQMD Rule 1108. 2 Allc~'~L"-;~;'~-r'~"qUirnmentsha]lco~,,P;ywlthSCAQMD BO C Revtsw of plans NC 2/4 Rules' 402 and 403.-Additionally, contractors shall Include the following provisions: ' "Ree~abiishgroundcoveronlhe~,~.~;,~:tfon. slte BO C Revlew of plans NC 2/4 : through seeding and wataHng.. · · ~ !of8 " · Phase grading to prevent lhe susceptibility of large BO areas to erosion over~e~ended periods of time. C Review of plans NC 2/4. · Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of BO C exposed excavated soil during and 'after the end of Review of plane' NC 2/4 Work pedoda~ · . · Dispose of surplus eXCaVated material BO C Rovtsw of plans A aCCOrdance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. · · 4 · SWeep Streets according to a acher~ule ~ BO C During by the City. if silt Is carried OVer to adjacent public A 4 thomughfaros .or occurs ee a result construction · Timing may vary depending upon the lime of construction~ . · 'SUspend grading operations during highwtnds BO C . During . A 4 · wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in acca~clanca with ' ' $CAQMD Rule 403 reqUirements. ' goflsfluclton · Maintain a mlnlmum 24-Inch freeboard ratio on; BO C During A haul trucks or cover payloads using tssps or other 4 suitable means.. Construction The. site shall be treated with water or other BO C During ' ~ A soil-stabil~ng agent (approved by scAQMD and · 4 Regional Water Quality Control BOard [RWQCB]) dally constilJction to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PMso) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. ' Chemical soll~ts~h:::~r~ (app~uved by $CAQMD; BO C During' . A 4- RWQCB) shall be applied to all InaclJve construc~ ConstruCtion areas that remain Inactive for= 96 hours or mom to reduca PMso emlsalons. · · conslruction-gmding pians include a ~;,,;~ent that ~ . crev~ will shut off equipment when not In use. All Industrial and Commercial facilities shall post Signs BO C requiring that trucks shail not be left Idling for prolonged . Review of plans A 4 periods (I.e.,.In excess of 10 minutes).. . All Industrial and commercial facilities shall designate CP preferential parking for Vanpools. .' C Review of ptans NC 2/3 All Industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or CP C more employees shall be required to pest both bus and Review of D Metrolink schedules in COnspicuous areas. · 2/3 Industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 CP · C more employees shall be required to COnfigure their R. evlew of plans. D operating schedules ' 2/3 around the Metmfink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. All residential and COmmercial structures shall be BO C/I) RevteW of plans C required to incorporate high efficiency/Iow p011utln 2/4 heating, air COnditioning, appliances, and water All residential and commerCial' structures shall BO to inCOrporate, thermal pane windows and C/D Review of plans C ' weather-stripping. .. 2/4 If any. prehlstorlc'archaeooglcal resourCes ar~ encountered before or during grading, the developer ~'11 retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor constructiOn activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve lhem for study. With the assistance of the ' archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucemonga will:.. · . Enact interim measures to protect undesignated cP/BO C Revlew of report ND "sites 'from demolition or significant modificalion .. 3/4 without an opportunity for the city .to astabtish Its · archaeological value. C~:4_-_~ e~b~L-hlng pro~Is~o,~ to CP/BO C Review of report ND 3/4 InCOrporation of archaeological sites within new .. developments, using their special'qualities as a theme or focal point. · Pursue _~_,.~;;,g the public about ~ =,,~=*m CP/BO C Revlewofroport ND arch~,eological heritage. 3/4 · . 3ofs e,ec~s on significant, moortanL and .,,~;~. · p~h. lstoric resources, following apgmn~'~te~:~'~ ' · 3/4 · . . og ormation Center for permanent ~]cal monitor, trained and ICP B " I ~.t~r has completed salvage: I I gram.ng .con~'a~o. r Should · Immediately ' divert I I" Su,,,~,,,'a su~,~a,-~, report to the City of Rancho CPD. Revlewofreperl D 3 I Cucamonga. Transfer co~iec~ed spec~ma% with a I ~PY of. the reporl to me'San Bemardlno County 4 of 8 The site shall be treated with Water or other soil. BO C During A ' 4 ' stabilizing agent (apprOVed by SCAQMD and RWQCB) construction daily to reduce PMso emissions, In accordance with $CAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible~ 'F. mntage public streets shall be sw~'~'aCcordlng to a BO C During . A schedule established, by the City to reduce PMso 4 emissions associated with vehicle I~acking of soil co~ off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. ' Grading operations shall be suspended When v/eM BO.' C During ' speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~0 emiSSions A from the site duflng such episodes, construction Chemical soil st~h.~;z-_-?, (appi-c, ved by SCAQMD and BO C During A 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all Inactive construct]on constomtlon areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~0emlsslons. . pd°rto!"--"u~-~ce°fora~;ngp~,~;ts, thePe,~i~;[appllcant BO B/C/D RevleWofplm~ NO 2/4 shall submit to Building Official 'for approval. Storm Water Pollution Prevent]on Plan (SWPPP) specifically ' ' Identlfijlng Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduCe pollutants during constmctk)n activities entering the strum drain system to the maximum extent practical. 5of8 An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, Included In BO B/C/D Revtsw of plans A/C the Grading Plan, and Implemented for the proposed 2/4. project that Identifies specific measures to control on- "' kl ~=*-uwu~ are Inlu~l[~3 D31'Ou~h completion' of grading. This Eros on control Plan shall Include the fctlowing measures at a minimum: a) Specgy t~e timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced In sOuthern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be " -ul[w as a result of this project will be corrected thr0ugh'a remedlatlon or restoration program within a specified time frame. : · · During construction, temporary berms such as BO B/C~ Review of Plato NC 2/4 sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or esdlment from the site ~d~on there · ' Is rainfall or other runoff. ' - ' During construction, to rem°ve pollutants, BO B/C/D cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and Revtew of plans NC 2/4 ' ' after the use of water trucks to central dust In order to prevent discharge of debris or Sediment from the site. The developer shal Implement the BMPs Identified In CE B/C/D Revtsw of plans NC the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared 2/4 by RMA on February 21,2005, to reduce pollutants after ' ' entering the storm drain system'to the .. maximum extent practical. Lan~,6ca~,;ng r";ans shall Ir~,_,de 'prer,~,~-~ BO' B/C/D Revtsw of plans NC 2/4 controlling and . minimizing. ' the use 'of ~ monp.?m3 a. na maintained for at least two yearn to ensuro aoequam Coverage and stable growth. Plans for these, areas,. Including monitoring provislous for a " minimum of two years, shall be submittod to the City for review and approval prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits. ' ' · ' ' Prior to Issuance of building permits, the applicant shal: CE B/C/D Review of plana i NC aubmit to the City Engineer for approval of a WQMP, 2/4 Including a project description and Identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants Into the storm' drain system tothe maXimum extent pract cabta.' The WQMP ahell Identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent wi{h the Guidelines for New · Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga In June 2004. I J Pdor to issuance of Grading or paVing Permits, the BO applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intant (NOi) to comply B/C/D Review of plans NC 2/4 with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Elimination System (NPDES) General Storm Water Permit from the state Water Resources Cohtrol Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of' the Waste DtsCharger's ' Identification Number) shall be submitted to the Cify~ Building Official for coverage ~inder the NPDES General ' Construction Permit. Construction or grading'shall not take place between the BO C During' A 4 hours of 8:00 'p:m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, constnJctkm including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday, Construction or ~,~=~;;f~g noise levels shall not exceed theBO C During A standards specified in Development Code Section 4 .;17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. The conelrucflon developer shall .hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring 'as specified In Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, If n01se levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall Immediately notify the Planning Department. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then COnstruction activities shall be reduced in Intensity to a level of compliance with above · noise standards or halted. ' · ' ' 7of8 The perimeter block wall shall be consbucted as earb/ .as'p°ssible In the first phase. · A Hau truck deliveries shall not take rj~.:.= between the PO/BO C During A 4/7 hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6~30 8.m. on weekdays, c0nslmction Including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, If heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (Counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul mutes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul mutes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings: Ksyto Chenldlst Abbreviations C__P-City Planner or designee 2 - Withhold Grading or Building Pemllt 3 - Withhold Certificate of Occupancy '~. Stop Work On:la' -.. 8 of 8 .. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTDEPARTMENT 3TANDARD CONDITIONS :OjECT #: DRC2003-01 i30 ~BJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT .. PLICANT: souTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CATION: NORTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD, EAST OF DAY CREEK CHANNEL ,L OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY. TO YOUR PROJECT. PLICANT sHALL CONTACT THE pLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR MPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: General Requirements. como~e~o. Date 1 ~ The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense.any action brought against lhe City, its / / " agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or In lhe alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant ~hall reimburse' the. City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attomey's fees which the City, Its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of sUch action. The City may, at Its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation · shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under ~ls condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Comm!sslon Resolution of Approval NO. 05-27, Standard. / /.~ Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The' sheet(s) are for information only to all pai'ties involved in Ifle construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. Time Limits · " t. Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or Development/Design Review approval shall expire if' I / building perm/ts are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval. No extensions are allowed. · Sits Development 1. The Site Shall be developed and maintained in aCCOrdance wilh the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and Development Code regulations.. . 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions I I Of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of I~e City Planner. , ' · * *. ProJe~ No. DRC2003-01 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time es ell Uniform Buiiding Code and ! Stata Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Depertment to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for Compliance prior to occupancy!' . 4. Ail site, grading, landscape, irrigation, end street improvement plans shall be coordinated for __! !. ~onslstency prior to issuance of any permits (such es grading, tree removal, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom ot subdivis on, or approved use has commenced, whichever comas first. 5. Approval of this request ~hail not waive compliance with all sections ~fthe Development Code, all. / / other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 6. A detailed On-site lighting plan, Including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved .~/ /. by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 7. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meat City standards. The final design, locations; and .~/ '_.._/. the number of trash receptaclas sha be subject to City Planner revtaw and approval prior to the Issuance of building permits. 8. .Ail ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as Iransf°rmers, AC condensers, etc.. shall be / I located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of.concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. For single- family residential developments, transformers shall be plaoed !n underground vaults. 9. All building numbers and individual Units shall be Identified In a clear and concise manner / /' including proper Illumination. 10. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property .~/ /. owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenanCe shall be submitted for City Planner and City Englnear review and approved.prior to the issuance 'of building permits. D. Building Design . , t. Ail roof appurtenances, Including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or .~/.__/ projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screan!ng shall be architecturally ntegrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Details shall be Included In building plane. E. Parking and VehiCular AcceSs (indicate details on' building plans) ' 1. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and Rancho / / · Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. For residential development private gated entrances shall provide adequate turn-around space in front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public 2. Ail parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long. When a side of any parking space abuts / a building, wal, support co umn, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide. ' 3. Ail parking lot landscape Islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feat and shall contain a.12-inch walk adjaCent to the.parking stall (inctuding curb). Project No. pRC2o03-o1130 4. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, enlrances, .__/__/.__._ and exits shall be striped per City standards. Landscaping 1. A detailed landsCape and Irrigation plan, including slope Planting and model home landscaping in / / the Case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval.in the.case of a custom lot subdivision. :~ ' ' 2.. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15'gallon tree for every three parking / 3. Trees shall be planted !n areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one . ..tree per 30 linear feet of building.. 4.' Ail private slopes of 5 feet or mOre In vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 / / slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropdata ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be . ..installed by the developer prior to occupancy.. 5. 'Ail private slopes In excess of.5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater __/ / slope shall be landscaped and'irrigated for.erosion conl~ol and to soften their appearance as · follows: onelS-gallonorlargersizetreepereachlS0sq, ft~ofslopearee, l-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, Slope banks In excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each. 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted In staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope'planting required by this section shall inclUde a'permanent Irrigation. system to be installed by the developer pdor to occupancy: 6. For multi-family residential and non-residential development; property owners are responsible for / the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas. within the public right-of-way. Ail landscaped areas shall be kept free fi'om weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased,.or decaying p ant material shall be replaced within 30 days fi'om the date of damage. 7. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks Shall be'l~cluded in / /..__ the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering DeparlmenL , 8. speCial landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, speCimen size trees, meandering /.___ sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along Base Line 9. Landscaping and Irrigation systems ~quired to be in~talled Within the public right-.ol;--way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 10. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed .to conserve water through the prt~ciplea of · / I Xeriscepe as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. Signs · 1. The signs indicated on the submitted plans ara conceptual only and not a part of this apProval. / / Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department pdor to installation of any signs. · Project No. DRC2003.0' H. Environmental " .. 1. ' Mitigation measures are required for lhe project. The applicant is responsible for. the cost of /._../. implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, 'letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount .of $474.00 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff t me to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be COnsidered grounds for forfeit.. I. Other Agencies . · t. ' The applicant shall contact the U.S. Po~tal Sen/ice to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes wilh adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead sbuctura shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the !ssuance of building permlto .... APPLICANT'SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477'2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: . ' ' NOTE: ANY REVISIONSMAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDm0NAL REVIEw(S) · J. General Requirements 1. Submit five COmplete sets of plans including the following: !__!. a. site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; o. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling ant Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; · f. ' Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septio system location, f'~'ture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and · g; I~lannlng Department Project Number (DRC2003-01130) clearly Identified on the outsIde of · all plans, 2, Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils reporL .__./, /_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and ~wet' signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3.. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensal~3n coverage to / / the City prior to permit Issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. I I 5. Business Shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the I I Building and Safety DepartmenL K. ' Site Development ' " '. · . · ' . " I 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to COnstruction. All plans shall be ~ I /_ · marked with Ihe project file number (DRC2003-01130). The applicant shall comply with the latest [ . Completion Date · adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of perm it application. Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Cede Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. . 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial Or Indbstrial development project or / /__ major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such.fees may include but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, permit and Plan Check Fees, Construct!on and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permits issuance. 3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map __/__/ recordation and prior to Issuance of building permits. 4. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday __/.__/ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. . ' · Conslrucl trash enciesure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department's public counter). · New StructUres 1. Provide compliance With the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances / I considering use, area, and fire-resistivanees. 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Cede for required occuPancy separations. .~/.__./ 3~ provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC .~/ Section 1505. 4. Exterior walls shall be COnstructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC Table 5-A 5. Openings in eXterior walls shall be Protected in accordance with CBC Table 5-A. / 6. uPon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional requirements may be n~ded. ' .~/ /' Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall bein accordance with California Building Code, CltyGrading /._ / Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be In substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. 2.. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of Califomia to ~/..ml perform such work. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geOlogist and submitted at the /.__/ time of application for grading plan check.. 4. The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, · / / submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building · permits. 5. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for /' /__ existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer... · · Project No. DRC20034] Cc~oleffon APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: N. Dedication' and Vehicular AcceSs · 1.: Rights-of-way and easements shall 'be dediCated to the City for all interior public streets, · i.__~ community trails, public peseos, public landscape areas, street b'ees, traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shoWn on the plans and/or tentative map. · Private easements for non-public facilitie~ (crosS-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc.) shall be · reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. 2. ' 'Dedication ~hall be·made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter ~treets (measured from / street centertine): . · 60 total feet on Base Line Road. · I / 3. Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be I / dedicated to the City.. O. Street Improvements 1. All public Improvaments (interior Streets, drainage facilities, communib/Vails, paseos, landscaped __/- I areas, etc.) shoWn on the plans shall be constructed to City standards. . 2; Pursuant to City Council Resolution No. 88-557, i~o person shall make connections fToma source / · / of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated by technical codes · and for which a permit Is required unless, In addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinanCes, all improvements requi~'ed by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the C!ty Council, except: that in develOpments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required 'by conditions of approval of development. In no case shall more than 95 Percent of the buildings or Units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of al! improvements required by these conditions of approval of development. 3. COnstruct the following perimeter street Improvements including, but not limited.to: / / ICu~b & I Ac. i S,d,- I Drive I Street I Street I Corem I Median I' Bike I · I Street Name / Base Line Road J X I X I C J X I X I X I I ' J I I · NoteS: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) paVement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If SO marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If sO marked, an in-lieu of consb'ucflon fee shall be provided for this Item. 4. Improvement Plans and Construction: . · a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights / on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and sha be subm tted to and approved by the city Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed ~o the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attomey guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs flrsL b. prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees' shall be paid and a __/' /_ construction'permit shall be obtained fi.om the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required. · Projec~ No. DRC2003-O 1.130 Completion Date C.' Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffiC signal conduit, and / · / interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction / ! ' project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring~ Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides Of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer t) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at interseCtions and NO. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3,inch galvanized steel with puli rope or as specified. e. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all comers of inter~ecflons per City / / Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. ' Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffio at all times with / / adequate detours dudng construction. Street or lane closure permits are mquirad. A cash deposit sha be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving which shall be refunded' upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. ' · g. ConCentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks; Under sidewalk drains shall be / I installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots. · · h. Street names sha be approved by the city Planner prior to submittal for first plan check. __/ / 5. Provide a minimum of 3-Inch conduit for future fiber optic use on all streets With connection through the parkway to each lot or parcel (fiber-to-the curb, I- I I C). The size, placement, and location of the conduit shall be shown on the Street Improvement Plans and subject to City Engineer review and approval pdor to issuance of building permits or final map approval, whichever comes flrsL . 6. · Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, s~all be installed per City Standards In .~/.~/ accordance with the City's street tree program. 7. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and stsnderd~ as follows. The COmpleted ___//.~ legend (box below) and construction notes Shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: 'Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet 1 typically sheet 1).' Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement'plans, . · The City Engineer reserves the dght to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other' variables. For additional information, cor!tact the Project Engineer. : Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing 81ze Qty. . . BASE LINE ROAD E/O HAVEN'AVENUE Foreground Tree o ound p.A. 8 I'c er greater PInus canartensls Canaw IsJand PIne 8fL ~25 fL O.C. .15-gal. / Construction Notes fo'r Street Trees: 1) ' All street trees are to I~e Planted in accordance with Citystandard plans. 2) Prior. to the c~mmencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill coil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All sfreet trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Department. 4) Street trees.are to be planted per public improvement plans only. : 8. Intersection line of sight designs' shall be reviewed by the city Engineer for conformance with ...__/ adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or. industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted a~ mquirad. p, Public MaintenanceAreas' 1. A separate set of iandscape and irrigation plans Per Engineering Public Works Standards shall ..__/ be submitted to the City Engineer for review'and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of bu ding permits whichever occurs flrsL 'The following 'landsceped parkways, medians, paseo,s., easements, trails or other areas shall be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance 2. Public landscepe areas are required to Incorporate substantial areas (40%) of mortared cobble or ___/ '___/. other acceptable non-irrigated surfaces. .... .. 3. A signed consent and waive~; form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscepe and Lighting / Districts sha be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs firsL Formation cests shall be bome by the developer. 4. Ail required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the ! ! developer until accepted by the City. 5. Parkway' landsceplng on the following slreet(s) shall conform to the results of the respective' ! ! Beautification Master Plan Base Line Road. Q. Drainage and Flood Control 1'. Adequate provisions Shall be made for acceptance and disposal of Surface drainage entering the _.._/ · property from adj .acent areas. 2. A permit fi-om the San Bemardino County Flood Control District and Southern Callfomia Edison / are. is required for work within its right-of-way. · R. Utilities " . t.. ProVide separate utility services to each I~arcel including sanitary sewerage system, water,'gas, ·/ /. electric power, telephone, ahd ceble TV (all underground)· !n accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall.be provided as required.- · 2. The developer shall be responsible ~or the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. / 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucemonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Dislrict, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bemardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the cese of subdivisio9 or prior to the issuance of permits in the cece of all other residential · p~ectso ComoleUon Date 4. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. / I Approval of the final parcel map will be subject tO any requirements that may be received.fi'°m them. · General Requirements and Approvals ' . 1.: A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the city, covenng the estimated operating'costs for all new streetlighta for the first six months of operation, pdor to final map approval or prior to bui!ding permit issuance if no map ts involved. 2. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a DiverSion Deposit and ralated administrative fees shall / l · be paid for the Construction and Demolit on D version Program'. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated dudng construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the'City. Form cD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department when the first building permit applicafio~ is submitted to Building and Safety. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. PLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR, IMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: .' Security Lighting 1. All parking, commOn, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power. .__/.__ __ These areas Should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell. Ail buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings, with direct lighting to be provided by all entJ~ways, l.igh~ng shall be consistent around the entire davelopmanL Security. HardWare 1. One-inch Single oylinder dead bOlts shall be installed on all entrance doom. If windows are within ..__/ 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cytinder dead boff shal! be used 2. Ail garage Or rolling doom shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices. '/ /__ Security Fencing 1. ' All businesses or residential COmmunities with security fencing and gates will provide the police / / with a keypad a~c.,ess and a unique code. The initial code is to be submitted to the Police Crime Prevention Unit along with plans. If this code is changed due to a change In personnel or for any other reason, the new code must be.supplied to the Police via the 24-hour dispatch center at (909) 941 ~1488·or by contacting the Crime prevention Unit at (909) 477-2800 extension 2474 or extension 2475. ' · '" ' : Building Numbering - , , 1. Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime __/ visibllity~ · · ~LICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION kNNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING ~IDITIONS: · . · SEE ATTACHED RANCHO CUCAMONGAFIRE DISTRICT · STANDARD CONDITIONS September 21, 2004,. ~ Power. Storage · Southern California' Edison· ' ' N/S Baseline Road, F_JO Day Creek Boulevard (SCE Corridor). Public Storage and Extedor RV Parking DRC2003-01130' THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply 1. Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants: The following provides design guidelines for the spacing ant location of fire hydrants: a. The maximum distance between fire hydrants in commercial/industrial ProjeCts is 300 feet · No portion of the extedor Wall shall be located more than 150 feet from an approved fire hydranL For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 100 feet. b. The preferred locations for fire hydrants are: i. At the e~tranca(s) to a commercial~ industrial or reSidential project from the public il. At intersections. iii. On the dght side of the street, whenever practical and possible. iv. As required by the Fire Safety Distdct to meet operational needs of the Fire District. v. A minimum of 40 feet from any building. c. If any portion of a facility or building is. located more than 150 feet from a ·public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the extedor of the facility or building, additional pdvate or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided. · d. Provide one fire hydrant for each 1,000 gpm Of required fire flow or fractJon thereof. FSc-2 Fire Flow .. 1. The required minimum fire flow for this project, when automatic fire sprinklers are installed is 2,000 gallons per minute at a minim® residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch. This flow reflects a 50 percent reduction for the .installation·of an approved automatic fire sprinkler .system in accordance with NFPA 13 with central station monitoring. This requirement is made in accordance with the California -'ire Code Appendix Ill-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. 2. Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed Project may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adjacent ' property shall not be uSed to provide required fire flow. 3. Fire protection' water plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site. Building permits will not be issued until fire protection water plans are approved.· ' 4. On all site Plans to be submitted for review, sh°w all fire hydrants located within 600 feet of the proposed project site. . . FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems. 1, · Prior t° submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire ~prinkler system, the applicant shall submit · plans, specifications, and calculations for. the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping.: Approval of .the underground supply piping system must'be obtained prior to s. ubmitting the. overhead fire sprinkler system plans. FSC-4 Requirement for an Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems ... Rancho Cucamonga Fire District' Ordinance 15; the 2001 Califomia Fire Code and/or any other applicable standards require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in: 1. Commercial or industrial structures greater than 7,500 square feet, 2. All structures that do not meet Fire District access requirements (see Fire Access). 3. when required fire flow cannot be provided due to inadequate volume or pressure.. ' " ~,. When the building access does not meet the requirements of the'2001 California Building Code and the RCFPD Fire Department Access - Fire Lane Standard 5. When any applicable code or standard requires the structure.to be sprinklered. =SC-5 Fire Alarm System I. iThe Califomia Building Cede, .the RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 and/or the 'California Fire Code require a listed fire sprinkler monitoring Central Station Fire Alarm. Prior to the installation of the building fire alarm system, Fire Construction Services~ plan check approval and a building permit must be obtained. Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6. · 'SC-6 Fire District Site Access :ire District aCCess roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, treets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes. Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access {oadways Std #9-7. . 1, Location of Access: All portions of the structures 1st story exterior Wall shall be located within 150 feet of Fire' District vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the building. Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation,· gates, and fences are deemed obstructions. 2. SpecificatiOns for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are: a. The minimum Unobstructed width is 26 feet. b. The maximum inside turn radius shall be 24 feel c. The'minimum outside turn radius shall be 50 feet. d. ' The minimum radius f6r cul-de-sacs is 45 feet. e. The minimum vertical clearance is ;14 feet, 6 inches. · f. At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20 feet on each side. g. The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9 degrees or 20 percent. h. The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed :i2 percent. i. Support a minimum Icad of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW)..' J. Trees and shrubs Planted adjacent to the fire lane .shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of ·14feet, 6 inches from the ground up. Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct*Fire Department apparatus. · 3. Access DoorWays: Approved doorways, aCCessible without the use of a ladder,*shall be provided as followsi a. In buildings without high-~311ed storage, access shall be provided in accordance with the 2001 California Building Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards. b. In buildings with high-piled storage access doors shall be provided in each 100 lineal feet or major fraction thereof, of the exterior wall that faces the raquirad access roadways. When railways ara installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fire District access to all required openings. 4~ Access Walkways: Hardscaped access walkways 'shall 'be pro.vialed from the fire apparatus access road to all required building exterior openings, · 5. Commercial/Industrial Gates: 'Any gate installed across.a Fire Department access road shall be in accordance with Fire District Standard ~9-2. The following design requiremenfs appl~ a. The gate shall be motorized and slide open horizontally or swing inward. b. All gates must open at the rate of one Second for each one-foot of required width. c. When fully open, the minimum width'shall be 20 feet. d. Gates are not required to be motorized. 3 6. Fire Lane Identification: Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes. A Site Plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire .District standards shall be included in the architectural P!ans submitted to the Building and Safety Department for approval. 7. Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved'mitigation measures must be cleany noted on the Site Plan. A copy of the approved Aitemafive Method application, if applicable, must be reprOduced on the architeCtural Plans subm!tted to Building and Safety Department for plan review. ' FSC-IO Occupancy and Hazard Control permits Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or building construction. Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit; field inspection is required prior to permit Issuance. General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or." operation not specifically described below, which in the judgment of the Fire Chief is likely .to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property. · Hazardous Materials · · Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures · Liquefied Petroleum Gases. .. · · LPG Fuel Vehicles · Wood Products/Lumber Yards · ' FSC-I 1 Hazardous Materials - Submittal to the County of San Bernardino The San Bemardino County Fire Department shall review your Business Emergency/Contingency-Plan for compliance with minimum standards. Contact the San Bemardino County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-4631 for forms and assistance. The county Fire Depad,~ent is the Cai/EPA .Certified Unified program Agency (CUPA) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. If the facility is a NEW business., a Certificate of Occupancy issUed by Building & safeb,/will not be finalized until the .San Bemardino county Fire Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan. ' California Government Code, Section 65850.2 prohibits the City frOm issuing a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting specific hazardous materials disclosure requirements. A Risk Management Program (RMP).may also be 'required if regulation substances are to be used or stored at the new facility. !. Any business that operates on ranted or leased properb/which is required to submit a*plan,'is also required to submit a notice to the owner of the property in writing 'stating that the business is.. subJect to the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan mandates and has complied with the provisions. The tenant must provide a copy of the plan to the property owner within five (5) working 'days, if'requested by the owner. . . .'SC-12 Hazardous Materials - Submittal to Fire ConStruction Services 'lans shall be submitted and apprOved prior to construction of buildings and/or the installation of quipment designed to store,, use or dispense hazardous materials in accordance with the 2001 :alifomia Building, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD39 nd other implemented and/or adoPted standards~ FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review ail requests for alternate method, wher submitted. The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Aitemata Method" fora along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee. · Chronolo.qicaI.SUmmary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF' BUILDING PERMITS - Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1.' Private Water SuPply (Fire)' Systems: The applicant shall submit constructiOn plans, specifications, flow· test data and calculations for the private water main system for review anc approval by the Fire District. Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards. Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is required pdor to any buildin{; permit issuance for any structure on the site. Private on-site combination domestic and fire suppl~ system must be designed in .accordance with RCFPD Standards # 9-4, #10-2, and #10-4. The Building and Safety Department and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections. All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable priOr to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. Fire construction Services will Inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 2. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project.. Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard.. · Ail required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. CVWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing. Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CVWD. Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before . lumber Is dropped. 3. Construction Access: The access roads must be paved in. accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard ~J-7. All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14 feet; 6 inches above the finished surface of the road. 4; Fire Flow: A current fire flow letter from cVWD must be received. The appliCant is responSible for · obtaining the fire flow information from CVWD and submitting the letter to. Fire Construction Services. 5. Easements and ReciprOcal Agreements: Ail easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bemardino. · : pRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY pOWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures." 5 PRIOR TO oCcuPANCy. OR FINAL INSpEcTION - Please complete the following: . · 1~ Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or ddveway in. accordance With the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant.Markers.' On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2, ..Private Fire Hydrants: For the purpose of final acceptance: a licensed sprinkler C°ntmctor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on- site fire hydrants.. The .underground fire line contractor, developer, and/or owner are responsible for ' hiring the company to perform the test. A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available. The.fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow in aCCOrdance with the California Fire Code. 3, Firs Sprinkler System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. : 4. Fire Sprinkler Monlt0rlng: Prior to the issuance Of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler · monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. The fire sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested, and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subJect to the release of power). 5. Fire Suppression Systems .and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be-inspected, tested, and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or equipment is placed in service~ . Fire Alarm System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of oCCUpancy, the fire alarm system shall be Installed, inspected, tested, and accepted by Fire Construction Services. ?. Access Control Gates: Prior to the.issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested, and accepted in accordartce with RCFPD Standards ~9-1.or ft9-2 by Fire Firs Access Roadways: 'Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of oCCUpancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services: · The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and 'i contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking,, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who Is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways~ .. Address: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial/industrial and multi- family.buildings shall.post the address with minimum 8-inch 'numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness. When the building · setback'exceeds 200 feet from the 'public street, an additional non,illuminated 6-inch minimum number, address shall be provided at the property entrance. Larger address numbers will be required on buildings located on wide streets or built with large setbacks in multi-tenant commercial and industrial buildings. The suite designation numbers and/or letters shall be provided on the frOnt and back of all suites. : · . . 0. Hazardous Materials: Prior to the issuance'of a Certificate.of Occupancy, the applicant must demonstrate (in writing from the County) that the facility has met or is meeting, the Risk Management .Plan (RMP) or Business Emergency/Contingency Plan with the San Bemardino County Fire Department. Hazardous'Materials/Emergency Response and Enforcement Divisio~ The applicant must also obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Services. 11. Confidential Business Occupancy Information: The applicant shall completa the Ranch~ Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form. This form provid~ contact information for Fire Distdct use in the event of an emergency at the subject building o property. This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector. 12. blapping Site Plan: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8 Y=-inch by 11-inch o 11-inch by 17-inch Site Plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard #13-1 shall be revise~ by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as required In th~ standard. The Site Plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector. 7 T'H E. C I T Y. O F .~;~AN C~ 0 ~UCA~ONCA DATE: . April 13,2005 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning COmmission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner " BY: Larry Henderson, AICp~ Principal Planner SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2005-00078 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA/SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON· COnsideration of a Memorandum of. Understanding for 1he use of Southern California Edison Utility COrridors for recreational troll use and some commercial/industrial uses in selected · areas as allowed by the General Plan. BACKGROUND: For several years the city of Ranch~ Cucamonga and southern California Edison (SCE) have been engaged. In discussions regarding SCE's desire to develop dght of. ways under ownership or jurisdiction of SOE, located Within the corporate limits of the City*of Rancho Cucamonga. in addition, the City has planned for the use of POrtions of the. SCE dght of ways as commu.nity balls, parks, and/or ancillary recreation related uses through the adopted General Plan. As a result, SCE and the City have developed the attached 'Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) COncerning the Development. of 'Southem California Edison Right of Ways.' Attached to that document is a Master Plan that depicts SCE'S right of ways and the land uses which the City and SCE'deslre to develop and use on said right of ways. A. General: The City has reviewed the proPOsed uses depicted On the attached Master Plan · and has determined that the proPOsed uses are, in 'general, contextually appropriate to the location where each use is .proposed. Each of the proposed land Uses depicted' on the Master Plan, however, are subject to review and approval actions including but not limited to, general.plan amendments, zone changes, conditional use permits, development review permits, parcel maps, and building and fire plan checks, depending upon the nature of the proPOsed land use and Its location Inlhe City. · . The City and SCE recognize that Should the sCE right 01~ ways be developed aCCOrding to lhe land use depicted on the Master Plan, the development must occur in an organized manner, and the projects' must be consistent wfth the CitY'S General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and all'other applicable regulations and policies.. · · PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ' · " DRC2005-00078 '- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA/SoUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON. Ap~l !3, 2005 Page 2 ' Implementation of the citY's Ma~ter Plan of Trails as depicted on the Master Plan attached ' for reference are, in general, conceptually appropriate for use' within the portions of SCE dght of ways where each use is proposed ... implementation of each City Recreation Facilities'and/or ancillary use(s) shall be'subjec~ to SCE's review and.. approval of individual Ucense Agreements, which includes the .. oPerating requirements and limitations of SCE,· Trails Advlso~Y Commiffee: On February 9, 2005, the Trails Advisory committee reviewed and recommended approval of the SCE MOU as presented. Parks and Recreation Commission: February 17, 2005, the Parks and. Recreation Commission reviewed and recommended approval of the SCE MOU as presented. -' '. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that, through, minute action; the Plannlhg Commission recommend that the City council approve the MOU and Master Plan as presented. in orderto Implement the City General Plan Trails Master Plan. City Planner . · BB:U-I/ma . · Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Memorandum of Understanding '(MOU) ,2'7/ .... · '. Memorandum ofUl~deretanding ("MOU") . ' " 'COncerning the Development of Southern California Edison Right of Ways within ' the Corporate Limits and sphere of Influence of the .~ " · ' City of Rancho Cucamonga . The. City:of Rahcho .cucarn~)nga ("City') and Southem Califomia Edison· ("$CE') for '~everel · . : · years have been engaged in discussions regarding the desire of SCE to develop RigM of Ways : ·. · under ownership or jurisdictlon of SCE located within the corporate limits of the City of Rancho ' · Cucamonga. In addition the City has planned for the use of portions, of ~e SCE Right o[Ways aa community trails; parks, and/or ancillary recreation related uses through the adopted General - · Plan. AS 'a result $CE and the City have developed the attached "City of Rancho Cucamonga - . · "' SCE MOU - Master Plan" ("Master Plan') of SCE'a Right of Ways dated ' .. 2005,'~ * . and.attached hereto as Exhibi~ A, which depicts SCE's Right of Wa. ye and ttm land uses which ':. the City and SCE desire to develop and use on said Right of Ways. .. ' ' The City has reviewed the proposed uses depicted on the Master Plan and has datermined that . the proposed uses are~ in general, .contextually appropriate to the location where each. use la '.. ~.:' Each'of the.propoSed land uses d~Picted on the M~;ster Plan, however, are subjeot.to review and approval actions Including but n°t limited to, general plan amendments, zone changes, · ' conditional use permits, development review psrmlts,' parcel maps, and building and fire plan · checks, depending Upon Iha nature of the proposed land use and its:location in the City. The clt~and $cE recognize Iflat should the $CE Right:of Ways be developed acx:ording to the . land use depicted on the Master Plan, the development must occur in an organized fashion, arid · ~ the projects, must be consistent with 'the City's Gene.ral Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and all otha? applicable regulations.end policies. . ..' After considering the communlt7 planning issues associated with th develoPment of SCE Right · .of Ways within the clt~ the .folio. wing underetandlhg and considerations have been determined:. · .1. The Land Uses depicted'on theMaster Plan dated. "' ~005 are, In. .. · general' contextually appropriate to the location where each use is proposed. ... · 2. EaCh develoPment'project proposed by SCE Will be Subject to, and consistent with.the City's General. Plan, .Developmept Code, .and all othm: aPPlicable, regulatiorm and ... i;)olide~.. .... .... . .. .. : 3.' ,mplementafl~" of the City's MaS!er Plan of. Trails a.s d.e. piot?_:l__?_n.,the_~_ ~o~..~u~r P~t~iCln~e. - " · "2005 are, ~n general;, conceptua,y appropnau~ ' . .... . "' ' ~ of Ways wh~re e. ach use la proposed... - ' 4:' Implementation of each ~CIty'R~oreation Fadiltiea:and/or anCillary use(a) shall be .. %bject to $CE'e review, and approval of individual .Ucens~ Agreements, which Includes · the operating requirements and limitations ~ $CE. . '" Exhfbtt WA" I "'" .Mem0mndum of U~cler~t~nding ' . .. City of R~nch°'Ci~camonga: ' ' ' ' ' ' . MayorWilliam N~ndar · - .. S0uthem Calif°mia Edison: ' · ~ manau.r · ' ' Real Estate" Revenue Division '. Corporate Real F_~tate Department · .' .. RANCHO CUCAMONGA - SCE MOA RANcHo CUCAMONGA PROPOSED RECREATION SITES RC - l- ' i portion of SCE "fee oWned'' Right of Way ('Lugo-S~rano 500kY Tr~n~n/ssion Line) located on the west side of East Ave. for use as a graded dirt let. for special event parki~, g up to twelve' (12) times per year for'equestrian related events consi~ng of car, truck and horse ~-ailer park/ng. RC - 2. A 2.00 - 3.00 acre'portion of SCl/'Tee Owned" Right of Way located on the east' side of tho Day Creek Channel, north of the Wilson Ave. for use as an ~!?aved parking lot for trail nsec(s) vehicles and possibly rest room facilities. It should be noted that $CF. is cu. vntly evalua~ng the future of this ,vro~e,V a~t the ~vO~ibiliO, of.. dispositio~ . · "RC - 3 Trail use for existing 2.SO-mile section of the sCE Right of Way (Lugo- Serrano 500kV Tr~n~nission Line) Consi~ing of SCE "fee owned" and "easemenF' · . pWpen'y east of the Day Creek Channel, north of 2$th St. to the eastern City limits. " .RC_4 . Trail use for existing 1.77-mile section of the SCE Right of way (tgtiwanda-Padua 220kV Transmission Line) consisting of SCE "fee'Owned" pwperty north of Summit Ave., east Of the Day Creek Channel to the northerly City ]imlts. RC-5 Trail UsO for existing .90-mile section o£ SCI~ Right of WaY (Middle Lugo-Mira Loma 500kV Trausm/ssion Line) consisting of SCE "Tee owned" pwPerty northeast of the Day Creek Ch~nnei to tho northerly city.limits. RC-6 Trail use for a seCtion of'~58 mile of the SCI/Right of Way ( Etiwanda- .Padua 220kV Tr~.,~mi~ion Line) consisting of SCE 'Tee owned" property south of Almond St. and adjacent to Turquoise Avenue. RC ~ 7 ' · Trail use for a .68 mile section of the $CE Right of Way (Etiwanda-Padua 220kV Transmission. Line) consisting of SCI~ 'Tee-ownad" property north .of Almond Avenue and east and west of Carnelian Street. c-s · -T fora .00miles°fSC 'Right0fWay0 'ti ana 'Paaua22°kv Transmissi°n Line). consisting of SCE "fee-o.wned" and ,easement" commencing jUSt east of H=rmosa Ave. along the northern City limits and ending at the easterly City limits. EXHIBIT "A" RANCHO CUCAMONGA - SCE MOA $CE ' CURRENT DEVELOPMENT SITES SCE - 1 Power Storage North Side of Bnseline Rd. Bast of Rochmer 8.00 acres (Self Storage). · Etiwanda- Pauda 220kV Transmission Lin~ Right of Way SCE- 2 Guardian 'Storage {'Phase Ilr} North Side of Arrow Route,, East of Rechester Ave. 14.50 acres (Recreation,! Vehicle Storage) West Lugo-Mira Loma $00kV Transmission Line Right Of Way SCE - 3 Allstate RecYCling Eaat side of Etiwanda Ava, South of Arrow Rout~ 1.00 acre ('Material Storage & Parking) W~t Lugo ~ Mira Loma 300kV Tra-~m[~sion Line RightofWay SCE - 4 1L CHtchfield North side of 49 Str~q, East of.13 freeway 6.00 acres (Self Storage) ' go- Lom. 300ZV of Way SCl~ ~ l~trrURR DEV'RLOPM~NT S1'1'~:$ SCE-3 ' FutureSite .'. ' '. South side of Arrow Routa, We, at of 13 lh~way 3~94 acres (Poss~le Uaes: Commoc¢ial, Indu.~trial or Mixed Uso) West Lugo ~ Mira Loma 300kV Transmission Line Right of Way ' · SCE-'6 Futur~ Site South side Foothill Blvd, west of Day ~ Cha-nel 4.67 acres ('Poasibl¢ use& Commercial, Industrial. or Mixed U$~) · . . · We, at Lugo -Mira Loma 300kV TransrnL~inn l.i~e Right of Way' SCE - 7' ' Future Site .. · . . North sid~ Foothill Blvd., West0fDayCreek Channel "1.00 acr~ (Possible Uses: Commercial, Industrial or Mixed Uso) .. West Lugo-Mira Loma 300kV Transmission Line Right of Way SCE- ~ Future'Site North side Foothill Blvd. to Baseline Rd., East 0fDay Creek 36.00 acre (Possible Uses: Commercial,'Industrial or Mixed Uso) · Efiwanda-Padua 220kV Tran~ufission L;ne Right of Way · 4/5/2005 ··PAGE 2 · EXI-IIB1T "A" · RANCHO cucAMONGA - SCE MOA SCE -'FUTURE DEVELOPMENT SITES - (continued) SCE-9 Futu~ Site South side Baseline Road, West of Day Cr~ Cbnnnel ' + 36.00 acres (Possible.Uses: Horticulture./Agriculture) West Lugo -'Mira Loma 500kV Tranmfission l.ine. Right of Way SCE - 10 Future Site' ~ North side Baseline Road, West of Day Creek Chnnnol · + 20;00 acres (PoSSible Uses: Horticulture / Agriculture) West Lugo -Mira Loma 500kV Tranmfission Line Right of Way . scE- l! ture .. . South side of Highland Ave., east of Orange Ave. + 15.00 acres (Possible Use: RV & Boat Storage) Efiwanda-Padua 220kV Transmission !.ine Right of Way ' ' .. 4/5/2005 PAGE 3 .. $CE-11 '. Btam UiRd .' II"m PROPOSED EQUF..~TRIAN GEN1 · PROPOSED TRAIL HF-.~D · ' ' .,~.L'"',~,E TRAIL AGREEMENT 8EGMI ExhibitA1 1 ' 0 · 1 2 Miles 1~3SCEF-~SEMSNTS Rancho' Cucarnonoa - 8CE , I BIM 8CE FEE OWNED Daryl Christian, 3 Jenner Street, Suite 180, Irvine, stated he is the applicant. He noted that this application for the subdivision is the final step of the wrap up in processing this map. He thanked staff for their assistance in the process. Vice Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing. He commented that this is considered a routine, clean-up matter. Motion: Moved by Stewart seconded by Fletcher, carried 4-0-1 (Macias absent), to approve Tentative Tract Map Subtt16987 as presented by staff by adoption of the Resolution of Approvalwith conditions. AYES: FLETCHER, McNIEL, McPHAIL, STEWART NOES: NONE ABSENT: MACIAS - carried B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2003-01144 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend Section 17.16.030 use regulations to allow public storage facilities, including outdoor RV parking, in the Utility Corridor District. Related Files: Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-01130 and Preliminary Review DRC2002-00704. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT' AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003-01130 - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON - A request for a public storage facility on 5.38 acres in the Utility Corridor District, along with outdoor RV parking, six storage buildings totaling 71,175 square feet, and a management office of approximately 1,430 square feet to be located on the north side of Base Line Road, east of Day Creek Flood Control Channel within the Edison power line corridor- APN: 1089-031-12. Related Files: Development Code Amendment DRC2003- 01144, Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-O0847, and Preliminary Review DRC2002-00704. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, gave the staff report noting that the applicant provided a more recant exhibit for the plant palette since the distribution of the agenda. He reported that the plant palette is essentially the same as shown on page B & C-6 of the agenda packet. Vice Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing. Ariel Valli, Valli Architectural Group, 81 Columbia, Suite 200, Aliso viejo, stated he represents the applicant. He said he is available to answer any questions or concams and he thanked stafffor their assistance during the review process.. vice Chairman McNiel asked what ha anticipates as a timeline for construction purposes on the project. Mr. Valli replied that assuming the Development Code Amendment is approved by City council, he would anticipate a 6-week window for the preparation of working drawings and then another 4 months for permits before construction can begin. Lloyd Dearinure, 12167 Avon court, Rancho Cucamonga, stated that consideration should be given for the homeowners that live adjacent to the Edison Corridor. He reported several concams about the proposed project. 1) He believes the City's General Plan calls for agricultural uses in the corridor. He said he does not want to live next to businesses and to allow businesses there would Planning Commission Minutes -2- April 13, 2005 be unfair to the homeowners; 2) He believes his property value will go down as a result of the project; 3) He believes the project will negatively affect his quality of life in that he lives north of trail and it will be visually unappealing; 4) He believes allowing RV storage will create traffic concerns, particularly for access and egress from the project site. Vice Chairman McNiel noted that the proposal is for the property specifically between Base Line Road to the railroad tracts and that the project does not affect Victoria Park Lane. He said the Development Code Amendment may in the future allow additional uses in the other corridors shown on the map, but it is not part of this project being considered tonight. Mr. Dearinure continued and said that he had visited existing storage facilities and noted several other problems; 5) There would be further impacts from security lights from the project; 6) The project will create a new source of noise; 7) The project will attract a crime element and possibly meth labs; 8) The project decreases open space enjoyed by the homeowners. He noted that Southern Califomia Edison advertises on their website the possibility of carwashes being built on these corridors. He commented that the residents live in the neighborhood, not Southem Califomia Edison (SCE). Kathleen Munson, 11996 Sagemont Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, said she agrees with Mr. Deafinure. She remarked that the rear of her home faces north and she lives between Rochester and Day Creek Boulevard. She said she researched the corridor property before she purchased her home and thought the corridors would remain open. She remarked that much of Rancho Cucamonga is designed after the ]wine area and that it has evolved into a well-planned community. She commented that there were plans to develop a jogging path and that it did not get developed as scheduled because of a lack of funds. She expressed concern that once the property is re-zoned, the use could change. She said she has observed high school students gather in the trail area and that there is drug and alcohol use along with the illegal running of motorized vehicles in the trail area. She said she loves the area and its proximity to her job. She added that she would not consider buying a home next to a storage facility and that her home value will be affected. She said she believes the project will attract crime and sometimes families are discovered living in these storage facilities. She said these facilities often have razor wire along their fencing. She said she received a citation from the City for having a trashcan in the front of her house and it seemed out of place to allow this project in comparison. She asked the Commission to be sensitive to the homeowners. Randall Taylor, 7177 Westhaven Place, Rancho Cucamonga, said he is in law enforcement and his backyard faces the Utility Corridor. He said he echoes the concerns of the previous speakers. He added that he spent a great deal of time searching for his home before purchasing in terms of a new neighborhood, a good place to raise his children. He said they had hoped for a new park. He said he hears stories about storage facilities attracting crime. He commented that he drives 1 hour and 15 minutes to work everyday, but considers it worth the drive because he feels he is safe where they live but if the project were approved, it would not be the same; the project would bring down the neighborhood. Marlo Avola, 12168 Avon Court, Rancho Cucamonga, stated he has worked for the Los Angeles county Sheriffs department for 15 years. He said the community is beautiful and that he loves what he sees so far but that he does not want to look at dirty boats and RV's from the back of his property. He repeated the same concerns mentioned by the previous speakers adding that he would not have purchased his home had he known this type of development would ever be allowed. Donald Bomemann, 7137 Westhaven Court, Rancho Cucamonga, echoed the previous speakers' concerns. He commended SCE for notifying the residents about the development proposal. He said he was not informed by Richland (the developer that built his neighborhood) that any of ~his was being discussed. He said SCE did not submit any plans for the proposal until after all the escrows were closed in his housing development. He commented that a storage facility Would become a dumping ground. He added that he believes there would be a liability issue if 50,000 volts of Planning Commission Minutes -3- April 13, 2005 electddty were to strike a metal storage building if the power lines came down. He said the City would gain more tax revenue if it allowed housing on the property rather than commercial property. Deborah Dearinure, 12167 Avon Court, Rancho Cucamonga, added that she too searched for her home before making the purchase. She said the proposed business would be unpleasant to look at. · and would cheapen the vista provided byVictoria Park Lane. She commented that she understands the portion near her home is not one of the corridor areas slated for development at this time. She added that they would not want to have to fight this issue in the future. She noted that she felt the notice sent out was unclear in presenting the project and the direction/purpose of the notice. She said her neighbors did not know anything about lt. Maria Segoriano, 7142 Westhaven Place, Rancho Cucamonga, said she has lived here for 3 years and she loves the schools and would hate to leave but they would consider moving if the storage facility goes in. She expressed concern about the view from her upstairs windows, the value of her home, and crime. Brad Buller, City Planner thanked the residents for their input and clarified that there am 3 distinct components to the project being presented: 1) the Development Code Amendment, 2) the Conditional Use Permit, and 3) the Memorandum of Understanding. He reported that most of the speakers commented on the corridor space that abuts their homes. He clarified that this specific Conditional Use Permit project does not apply to those areas directly abutting their homes. He said the site has a flood control channel and utility corridor to the west and an existing fire station to the east. He remarked that all of the speakers referred to the project as a variance and he clarified that it is not a variance, but a Development Code Amendment. He remarked that the Utility Corridor already has a list of uses allowed and that the amendment would expand that list to include another commercial use/public storage. He added that in regard to property value, storage units have in some cases mede excellent buffers between uses, some are heifer land uses as a transition than others and some have been welcomed. He noted that as long as the property remains a utility corridor, the City has very little control over it. He said to allow storage on the property could be a way of better protection of the property than leaving it as open space. He said that the Commission has the option to modify the request being presented tonight to include only certain portions of the corridor for storage depending on how comfortable they are with the proposal. In response to an earlier comment from a resident, he pointed out that the City actually has fewer homes than the density allowed by the City's first General Plan. He commented that much mo~e space has been allotted for parks and open space than originally planned. He commented that to the north of the proposed self-storage facility is a proposed linear park known as "Rails to Trails." He suggested that the residents might respond differorrtly to the Conditional Use Permit portion of the project proposal if the Commission chose to limit the development of certain portions of the corridor that might directly affect them. He gave the public another opportunity to address the Commission with their specific comments in that regard and asked them if they would still be directly opposed or just opposed in general. Randall Taylor returned to the podium and said he would feel the same; the project would bring noise and glare. He said the area separating the homes from the project may seem large, but it is not. He asked if the zone change would include the entire corridor. Mr. Bullet said it includes the areas indicated on the map all the way up to the 210 Freeway. He said there is also the site specific Conditional Use Permit and then the Memorandum of Understanding that enters into a general agreement with SCE that identifies portions of the utility corridor for trails and park services. Mr. Taylor asked if similar facilities could be constructed in the corridor adjacent to his properbj. Mr. Buller said they could. He said to limit which corridors could be included is within the Planning Commission's discretion. He pointed out that many commercial uses are currently allowed in the Planning Commission Minutes -4- April 13, 2005 corridors including uses such as agriculture, hydroponic culture, green houses, livestock grazing and breeding, on site sales, cemeteries, crematoriums, mausoleums, stables, trails, country clubs, flood control structures, and electrical substations to name some. Lloyd Dearingure commented that it is possible many people threw out the notice of this meeting because it was not clear as to what the notice was about. He felt many more would have come out in opposition had they understood more about the project. Commissioner Fletcher remarked that the number of people that came to the meeting tonight is a significant representation compared to the number that usually come to the meeting'for a specific item. Kathleen Munson added that she still would object to the proposal; she visually enjoys the open corridor and the development would be an eyesore. She said she favors agriculture or a golf course. She said that would beaufiflj the area. She reiterated that the project would de-value her home and it would be discouraging to see that. She said she is waiting for the jogging/bike-path to be developed and she is concerned about the potential increase of crime. Donald Bomemann reported that all the homes to the west of the project site are 2-story homes. He said many homeowners paid premium pdces for decks outside of the 2nd floor master bedroom. He said they were discouraged when SCE removed the trees in the corridor. He said he has some glare already from the fire station to the east and lights from the project would impact him. He said the project is about 300 feet away and that is not that far away. He added that it would be unattractive visually and he is agains~ it. Vice Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing. Commissioner Stewart commented that this is a difficult decision. She noted that the decision tonight is site specific and that development would only be allowed with the processing of a Conditional Use Permit. She said the Planning Commission has the authority to control what goes into those noted areas regardless of the zone change. She noted that the zone change does not specifically mean a storage facility would have to go on that site. She added that the Commission could bring the use back for review if we experience problems with the use. She said that the use could be modified, revoked and shut down if necessary. She commented that they have spent a lot of time reviewing storage facilities in Rancho Cucamonga and the code for their development is very restrictive. She added that this facility would have security cameras and a security gate. She said we do not allow razor wire or metal buildings. She said the buildings are high end architecturally. She said she believes this would be a compatible use for the utility area and that it already has a hazardous waste collection facility and a temporary fire station. She commented that the Commission may say "yes" to this one but not necessarily to others in the future; that each one will be considered individually, uniquely and on their own merit. Commissioner McPhail stated that.this site'is not directly behind homes and is buffered by the flood channel and in the proposed trail to the north. She said that this project has been through the Design Review Committee and the Committee has required a "high-end" of detail and it would be architecturally attractive from all sides. She said that in this case, for this site, she believes it would be a good use, but that each one will be looked at carefully and the impacts they will have on residents. Commissioner Fletcher commented that they are trying to be sensitive to the residents. He noted that the Development Code Amendment lends flexibility for the uses that can be used in the corridor and gives direction to SCE as to what uses would be acceptable. He commented that each application will have to go through the Design Review process and will have to conform to our strict standards. He noted that every time a storage facility is proposed, we hear concerns about the increase in noise, traffic and crime. He remarked that we do not see that happening in Rancho Planning Commission Minutes -5- April 13, 2005 Cucamonga in the facilities we are approving. He said we perform a detailed review of the surrounding streets and neighborhoods before approving storage facilities. He commented that there is a storage facility near his office and they are good neighbors; they do not create traffic issues, there are no loud parties, there are no businesses conducted in the units; there are no meth labs; no concertina wire. He added that the facility would be allowed under a Conditional Use Permit, which means if there are problems, the residents can report them to the Planning Commission and the use can be brought back for review. He said the flexibility of different uses allowed with the Development Code Amendment would be good. Vice Chairman McNiel said that they are charged as a Commission is to provide services needed by the residents of the community. He noted that if you have ever tried to rent storage space in Rancho, it is likely you will have to go on a waiting list, that there is a shortage of these facilities. He said that we have very few problems with the facilities that we do have. He stated he does understand the residents' concems and appreciates their desire for open space but that we do not have view rights in Rancho. He added that this project would serve the community at large and he supports it. He said the project was "well done." Mr. Buller asked what the height of the well is along the flood control channel side of the project. Mr. Valli confirmed it is 8 feet along the channel and around the perimeter of the facility. He added that all the security lighting is in "shoebox" housing and the light will shine straight down to minimize the impact of glare on the adjacent properties. He said the lights mounted on the walls will be at about a 9-foot height level and those in the parking lot will be about 15 feet high. Mr. Butler then encouraged the homeowners to view the specific plans of the project. He directed staff to have site lines available provided by the architect that depict the landscaping and screening on the west side of the preject. Jim Markman, City Attorney, clarified that the Planning Commission will be taking action on the three specifio items being considered: 1) the Resolution recommending approval of the Development Code Amendment; 2) the Resolution approving the Conditional Use Permit and 3) the Memorandum of Understanding. He added that the Conditional Use Permit application is not effective until the City Council approves the Development Code Amendment. He added that this action (for the Conditional Use Permit) can be appealed and there is a 10-day appeal period. He noted the Code Amendment and the Memorandum are automatically forwarded to the City Council for final action, Commissioner Fletcher remarked that development in Rancho Cucamonga is not rampant although it may be rapid. He explained that everything proposed in these items is allowable in the General Plan. He said in response to the residents that fear rampant development, that there is concern when open space is developed. He added that along with tract homes that are topping the one million dollar-mark come expensive motor homes. He added that we do not allow motor homes to be parked on the street and therefore we need to provide facilities for their storage. He said this facility is upscale in design. He noted that he believes this would be a good solution for the utility corridor. Motion: Moved by Fletcher, seconded by Stewart to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts, to approve the Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-01130 (noting the con'ected plant palette), to recommend approval of Development Code Amendment DRC2003-01144 to be forwarded to the City Council for final action, and to approve by minute Action the Memorandum of Understanding and Master Plan as presented. AYES: FLETCHER, McNIEL, McPHAIL, STEWART NOES: NONE ABSENT: MAC[AS - carried Planning Commission Minutes -6- April 13, 2005 NEW BUSINESS D. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2005-00078 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA/SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON - Consideration of a Memorandum of Understanding for the use of Southern California Edison Utility Corridors for recreational trail use and some commercial/industrial uses in selected areas as allowed by the General Plan. This item was discussed in conjunction with items B and C. PUBLIC COMMENTS No additional comments were made' at this time. ADJOURNMENT Motion: Moved by Stewart, seconded by McNiel, carried 4-0-1 (Macias absent), to adjourn; The Planning Commission adjourned at 8:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Approved: April 27, 2005 Planning Commission Minutes -7- April 13, 2005 Region Manager An EDISON INTERNATIONAL Company June 14, 2005 Larry Henderson City of Rancho Cucamonga t 0500 C, ivic C, eveer Rancho Cucamonga. CA 91729 RE: Environmental Assessment and Development Code Amendment DRC2003-01144 Dear Mr. Henderson: Thank you for your patience on this matter. Southern California Edison has contacted property owners v/no attended thePlarmir~ Commission .mc,~ctinoof April 13, 2005~ We believe that while neighbors may still have some concem, that most of their issues were addressed. Southern California Edison and Preferred Investments am requesting that the City move forward with the Environmer~at Assessment and Deveto~ Code Amendme~ DRC2003-01144 and bdng this matter to the City Council for their consideration if required. Please contact me if you have any questions or concerns. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Neil Derry cc: Mike Orduno CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~:~1 ~.F,,~s~-~ JUN 1 6 2005 Ontario, CA 91761 ~09-93~-'S501 e~0~-~sn07(fax) 300 £ O00 1200 Feet Tuesday, August 16, 2005 12217 Saxon Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 Rancho Cucamonga City Council City Hall Rancho Cucamonga, CA Dear Sirs: Regarding the proposal to allow California Edison to build a storage facility on their power line easement property: It is our opinion that such easements am provided to the power company for very good masons, that is for safety and to allow for futura power line construction. We were very surprised that the construction of buildings in proximity to the lines could even be considered. In our experience (we once had a power company easement running through our backyard) nothing was allowed in the zone, in fact even vegetation was routinely cut close to the ground for safety masons. It appeam that greed may be influencing this desire to develop the pmpe[ty, rather than the utility's obligation to safely provide power and to plan for futura expansion. Sincerely, Alan and Patricia Case Mayor Mr. William Alexander Mr. & Mrs. R.E. Langley City of Rancho Cucamonga 12319 Silver Saddle Drive 10500 Civic Center Drive Etiwanda, Ca 91739 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 909-899-9883 August 14, 2005 Re- 12309 Silver Saddle Dr (Wall built & Property Encroachment) Dear Mr. Alexander, As Early as July 27, 2005 the City of Rancho Cucamonga was notified as to a non- authorized wall being built between our properties. We expressed our concern about placement of this wall on our property and wall height that we did not authorize. The City of Rancho Cucamonga responded by stating, ~'A permit is needed, we will send someone out." The City responded on July 27, 2005 with Code Enforcement sending out an employee, (Hispanic Gentleman) whom did not communicate to us, talked to the workers and left. I then called again and spoke to Ms. Mary Westerly a Supervisor of Building and Safety. Mary responded the same day and stopped the work, because of her concerns of encroachment before any building or concrete had been done. On July 28, 2005 Mary Westerly communicated to us that, by eye the wall seemed to be on their side, the wall height was within City guidelines and authorized work to continue .on July 29, 2005. Mary also communicated to us if we have a professional measurement done and Encroachment has occurred, the City would enforce the issue and have the walls removed. I then made communications to Mr. Trang Q Huynh of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Trang was suppose to meet with me at our property, but came without my presence. Tran stated to me via telephone on 8-10-2005 via phone after looking at the Property and wall, "Clearly not only the front wall was encroached on our property, but the rear wall too." (Letter Attached) On August 12, 2005 in a phone communication to Mr. Tran Huynh (His day off), Tran stated he contacted the contractor/builder (via phone) of the walls for 12309 and requested the owner of the properties information, so he could contact them and was denied. (Stated he wrote letter instead) On 8-16-05 Mr. Lou Dillan called-me and stated he was trying to obtain the Contractors name, phone # and information on the business whom is building the wall, but could not. Shouldn't this information have been obtained first?? (I thought you spoke to the contractor already, I'm puzzled.) I'm very disappointed in the City for trying to manipulate responsibility for their actions! First stating Enfomement of encroachment would be handled by the City of Rancho Cucamonga and now Mr. Huynh trying to state it's a private matter. Clearly the City of Rancho Cucamonga has not acted in good faith, and has lead me to believe the City would enforce the issue. If no permit is required, why did your City Employee, Ms. Mary Westerly stop work? If wall height wasn't a concern and a permit was not needed, why where so many City Officials needed? Shouldn't the only actions by the City have been a statement to me, "A permit is not needed sorry we cannot do anything?" Clearly the City of Rancho Cucamonga has lead us to believe they have enforcement powers and now trying to manipulate responsibility for authorizations, actions and communications. If there is know responsibility or enforcement powers, why do we need to pay so many City Officials and employees????????????? This letter is to Inform the City of Rancho Cucamonga if responsibity for actions, authorizations and communications are nbt taken for this encroached on our property, the appropriate action will follow ....... , ...... Sincerely, Mr. & Mrs. R.E. Langley Note; The finish on the wall on our side doesn't match the architectural desigrt of all other walls on our block or in the City, is there a code?? Cc; file/AWMayor/City Counsel City Manager AN ORDINANCE Of THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2003-01144, A REQUEST TO AMEND SECTION 17.16.030 USE REGULATIONS TO ALLOW PUBLIC STORAGE FACILITIES, INCLUDING OUTDOOR RV PARKING, IN THE UTILITY CORRIDOR DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. On April 13, 2005, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing with respect to the above referenced Development Code Amendment DRC2003-01144 and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted its Resolution No. 05-26, recommending that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt said Development Code Amendment. 2. On July 20, 2005, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Development Code Amendment. ' 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2: Based upon substantial evidence presented to the City Council during the above-referenced public headng on July 20, 2005, including wdtten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, the City Council hereby specifically finds as follows: The application applies to property located within the City; and b. The proposed amendment will not have a significant impact on the environment. c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and d. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Development Code; and e. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DRC2003-01144 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Page 2 SECTION 3: Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the City Council; and, further, this City Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects will be reduced to a less-than-significant level by imposition of mitigation measures on the component of the project that involves development approval for a public storage use on a specific site and by the imposition of site specific mitigation measures as applications for self-storage facilities are approved in the future. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council during the public headng, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. SECTION 4: The City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code is hereby amended to change SECTION 17.16.030, in words and figures, as shown in the attached Exhibit A. SECTION 5: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Ordinance is, for any reason, deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, or preempted by legislative enactment, such decision or legislation shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or words thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, clauses, phrases, or words might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional or preempted by subsequent legislation. SECTION 6: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. EXHIBIT A (DRC2003-01144) OF CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 17.16.030 Use regulations. Uses listed in Table 17.16.030(A) shall be allowable in one or more of the open space districts as indicated in the columns beneath each district. Where indicated with the letter "P," the use shall be a permitted use in that district. Where indicated with the letter "C," the use shall be a conditional use subject to the conditional use permit process. In the event there is difficulty in categorizing a given use in one of the districts, the procedure outlined in Section 17.02.040 use determination shall be followed. All uses are subject to the development review process as described in Chapter 17.06. The city planner may approve accessory uses and structures, and agricultural uses involving no improvements, under the minor development review process. Table 17.16.030(A) USE REGULATIONS FOR OPEN SPACE DISTRICTS 1[~. District Use OS !1.. FO ii UC 1. Single-family dwellings (not to exceed an average density of 1 unit per 40 acres): I P 2. Caretaker qua,ers: iL..____,_ a. Permanent Jl P ii P ii P b. Temporary il c ii c ii c 3. Home occupations: JL P ii -- ii -' 4. Accessory structures (such as detached garages, II carports, cabanas, guest houses, barns, storage sheds, corrals): a. Related to on-site single-family dwelling IL ~_ ......It -- il '- a. Rowcrops, truck gardens tl P !1 P iL P b. Plant storage or propagation Il_.. _..P.___..JI_._. P ..il c. Orchards, vineyards, Christmas and other tree I d. Community gardens .il P ~L P ii P I e. Greenhouses II .... f. Livestock grazing, breeding (no feed lots) Jl P [ P '[ p 6. Cemeter es crematories, mausoleums, columbar ums, i {r and related uses: C iJ .- ~ .. 7. Wildlife preserves and sanctuaries: il_ P [ P ii P 9. Recreational uses: a. Parks, picnic areas, playgrounds il. P jI P { P b. Hiking, biking, equestrian trails _II P !1 P I P c. Greenways il ? il P ~1 P EXHIBIT A (DRC2003-01144) OF CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. ii d. Golf courses - c .... c 'i[ e. Riding schools (equestrian) i! C j[ C C il. f. Commercial stables .il C ii C C il g. Country club and related uses Il c ~[__._c,~ ......~.._ .... 10. Preservation and use of historic landmarks and related I ii uses such as museums, art galleries, and food services I to accommodate on-site uses: j C , C C 11. Flood control structures and facilities: 1[ P ii P P 12. Light vehicle parking and storage in areas substantially ti _,._ ._._s.~r,,,ro,__unded by in_~du___strial uses: ti " c c ..1.~:__~_t. ij!.t.~y..s.~?J.a.tj~?__(.r..e..l_a.~_.e_gy!Rm~n_t.~d .s..t..r..u.c..!.u.~.sJ~ ....... II C ii c c 14. Public Storage and Recreational Vehicles' Il il C' P = Permitted Use C = Conditional Use Permit required (Ord. 211 § 6 (part), 1983) Not permitted within the Etiwanda North Specific Plan Area. I~ A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING D E PA RTi~IE N T Staff Report DATE: August 17, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Jerry A. Dyer, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE 2005/2010 MEASURE "1" FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AND TVVENTY-YEAR TRANSPORTATION PLAN BEGINNING IN FISCAL YEAR 2005/06 AS REQUIRED FOR MEASURE "1" FUNDS RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the Local Measure "1" Five-Year Capital Improvement Program and Twenty-Year Transportation Plan as requested by SANBAG to provide a public record of the intended use of Local Measure "1" Funds. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Measure "1", the county-wide transportation sales tax program, requires that each local jurisdiction receiving revenues annually adopt a Five-Year Capital Improvement Program and a Twenty-Year Transportation Plan which outlines the specific projects upon which those funds shall be expended. Staff has prepared the attached Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan schedule to be adopted by City Council and kept on file with the San Bernardino Associated Governments for informational purposes. The Five-Year list has been over-programmed to allow for spillage and to insure that the adopted plan contains ample projects for Measure "1" expenditures. If changes are necessary (additions or deletions), the plan may be altered at each annual adoption or intermittently with City Council approval. CITY CouNcIL STAFF REPORT Re: Five Year Capital Improvement Program/Twenty Year Transportation Plan August 17, 2005 Page 2 SANBAG has advised us the Twenty-Year Transportation Plan for Local Measure "1" Funds can be a list of projects for a 20-year period or narrative policy statement estimating the types of projects Local Measure "1" Funds are to be used for, and the percentage of funds allocated for each type of project. Since it is difficult to list actual projects 20 years in advance, Staff recommends Council approve the policy statement. Respectfully submitted, City Engineer WJO:JAD Attachments Ex~st~ng Measu~ RESO,UT ON NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE 2005/2010 MEASURE "1" FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AND TWENTY-YEAR TRANSPORTATION PLAN BEGINNING IN FISCAL YEAR 2004~05 FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF MEASURE "1" FUNDS WHEREAS, San Bernardino County voters approved passage of Measure "1" in November, 1989 authorizing San Bernardino Associated Governments, acting as the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority, to impose a one-half of one percent retail transactions and use tax applicable in the incorporated and unincorporated territory of the County of San Bernardino; and WHEREAS, revenue from the tax can only be used for transportation improvement and traffic management programs authorized i}~ the Expenditure Plans set forth in Ordinance No. 89-1 of Authority; and WHEREAS, Expenditure plans of the Ordinance requires each local jurisdiction receiving revenue from the tax to expend those funds pursuant to a Five-Year Capital Improvement Program and Twenty-Year Transportation Plan adopted by resolution of the local jurisdiction, and WHEREAS, Expenditure Plans of the Ordinance also require that each local jurisdiction annually adopt and update the Five and Twenty-Year plans. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, hereby adopts the Measure "1" Five-Year Capital Improvement Program and Twenty-Year Transportation Plan, a copy of which is attached to this resolution. ....... CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIVE YEAR '~ap No. YEA? ISTREET & LIl~llmS MEASURE IjiMPROVEMENPTLAN 2005/10 ..... 05/06 iI ] Cost Estimate !ADA Corrective Measures - City Wide I Intersection ramps and driveway modifications $ 100,000 1 ;Archibald Av - 19th St to Banyan St !Pavement Rehabilitation $ 300,000 2 I Archibald Av - Base Line to 19th St I Pavement Rehabilitation $ 385,000 .... 3-- __ ~_ Arrow Rte - Archibald to Hermosa ' Pavement Rehab~htabon --$ 2,000 4 ~_ Arrow Rte - at Etiwanda Traffic Signal Modification $ 100,000 5 -i Arrow Rte - W/O Etiwanda to ECL Pavement Rehabilitation $ 10,000 6 .... Banyan St - Sapphire to Carnelian Pavement Rehabilitation $ 10,000 ? Base Line Rd - Carnelian St to Lion Pavement Rehabilitation $ 290,000 8 'Base Line Rd - Haven Av to Deer Crk Channel Pavement Rehabilitation $ 266,000 9 ~ Line Rd - Ramona to Hermosa I Pavement Rehabilitation and Storm Drain $ 2,000 10 ___ Base Line Rd West City Limits to Carnelian [Pavement Rehabilitation $ 300,000 11 'Be___WI St - Cielito to 19th ~Pavement Rehabilitation $ 95,000 12 ~ Church St - Archibald Av to Hermosa Av I Pavement Rehabilitation $ 300,000 i Contract Services Concrete Maintenance $ 500,000 13 i Grove Av - 8th St to Arrow Pavement Rehabilitation and Widening $ 86,000 14 _l Hellman Av - W/O Hellman Ay to Amethyst St Pavement Rehabilitation, Widening, and Storm Drain $ 2,144,000 1~_ ...... _Hermo~sa Av - H__ig_hland to Banyan .... Paveme-nt Rehabilitation and Widening I $ 2,000 __.1_6- __ Hermosa Av - N/O Base Line to N/O RXR Pavement Rehabilitation and Widening I $ 2,00~- i Local Streets - City Wide Pavement Rehabilitation $ 1,002,000 __!Pavement Management Evaluate Pavement Condition $ 97,000 17 -- I- _'Sapphire St - 19th St to Banyan St -' .Pavement Rehabilitation $ 2,000 __] _ FY 05/06 Total $ 5,995,000 106/07 i ADA Corrective Measures - City Wide Intersection ramps and driveway modifications ' $ 100,000 18 , Archibald Av - Banyan St to Hillside Rd _ Pavement Rehabilitation ', $ 3~00,000 19 Arrow Rte - Hermosa to Haven [Pavement Rehabilitation i $ 250,000 20 ~ Arrow Rte - W/o~E'~-wanda to ECL Pavement Rehabilitation i $ 250,000 ____21_._ ......... _Banyan St - Sap~phire to Carnelian Pavement Rehabilitation $ 150,000 22 Carnelian St - Wilson to Almond Pavement Rehabilitation $ 450,000- Local Streets - City Wide Pavement Rehabilitation ~ 800,000 ! I - FY 06/07 Total $ '-- 2,300,000 Page 1 of 2 7/26/2005 I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -[ MEASURE I FIVE YEAR PLAN 2005110 Map No. YE,AR STREET & LIMITS IMPROVEMENT Cost Estimate 07/08 ADA Corrective Measures - City Wide Intersection ramps and driveway modifications $ 100,000 23 i Banyan St - Carnelian to Beryl .... Pavement Rehabilitation . $ 200,000 24_. _ Haven Av - 4th St to 7th St Pavement Rehabilitation $ 300,000 _. 25 Hermosa Ay - Foothill to Effen Street widening and pavement rehabilitation I $ 450,000 Local Streets - City Wide Pavement Rehabilitation I $ 800,000 __ 26 Wilson Av - Archibald to Haven Street widening and pavement rehabilitation I $ 400,000 FY 07/08 Total, $ 2,250,000 08/09 ADA Corrective Measures - City Wide Intersection ramps and driveway modifications , $ 100,000 27 Haven Av - Jersey Blvd to Foothill Bird Pavement Rehabilitation I $ 300,000 28 Hillside Rd - Carnelian to Beryl Pavement Rehabilitation [ $ ~50,000 Local Streets - City Wide Pavement Rehabilitation $ _ 800,000 29 Terra Vist_a_ Prkwy - Spruce to Milliken Pavement Rehabilitation $ 200,000 - 30 Vineyard Ay - 8th to Foothill Pavement Rehabilitation I $ 550,000 FY 08/09 TotalI $ 2,200,000 09/10 -- ! ADA Corrective Measures - City Wide Intersection ramps.and ririvewa'y modifications $- 100,000 -*-~:1--' l- Banyan St~-B~I to Archibald Pavement Rehabilitation $ 400,000 32 I Hillside Rd - Beryl to Archibald Pavement Rehabilitation $ 350,000 t.__ Local Streets - City Wide Pavement Rehabilitation $ 800,0(~)- 33 Milliken Av - 7th to Arrow Pavement Rehabilitation $ 600,000 ~ .... ! _ FY 09/10 Total $ 2,2_50,000 I i .... Five Year Total $ 14,995,00~ I Measure I Revenue Estimate (5 Yrs.) from SANBAG $ 12,716,000 *,-_ Rancho Cucamonga Measure I Fund Balance $ 4,501,00(~- I __ I Total Measure I Revenue Estimate (5 Yrs.) $ 17,217,000 - .-~- iContact: Jerr~ A. Dyer, Senior Civil Engineer (909) 477-2740 Ext, 4037 , Page 2 of 2 7/26/2005 '- I UPLAND FONTANA LEGEND: ~ MEASURE I FIVE YEAR PLAN ~""~" "J'~* ~ O NTARI O~.# ,~=,,, (~oo~ To eo~o) CUCAMONOA City of Rancho Cucamonga MEASURE 1 FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN EXPENDITURE STRATEGY 2005/06 The City intends to expend its Measure 1 funds generally as shown on our 20 year plan (attached). However, at present, we show funds being expended in FY 2005/2006 for one large project, the Hellman Avenue storm drain and widening from west of Hellman Avenue to Amethyst Street ($2,144,000). These funds could he reallocated in any given year depending upon a change in priorities. Including the projects budgeted for FY 2005/06 and projects encumbered during FY 2004/05; the City is projecting a Measure I fund balance of $1,253,000 at the close of FY 2005/06. These funds will be budgeted in FY 2006/07. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 20 YEAR LOCAL MEASURE I TRANSPORTATION PLAN The 20 Year Local Measure I Transportation Plan for the expenditure of Measure I funds will use the City's General Plan Circulation Element as a basis (copy attached). It is anticipated that the funds will be allocated in the following manner: Percent Type of Improvement 30 Maintenance, Rehabilitation and Repair of Existing Roadways 10 Traffic Signal Improvements 20 Street Widening 10 Intersection Improvements 10 Railroad Crossing Improvements 20 Slurry and Chip Seal of Existing Streets T H E C I T Y 0 F ]~ANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DA[E: August 17, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the CRy Council FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager BY: Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk/Records Manager SUBJECT: DESIGNATION OF A VOTING REPRESENTATIVE AND AN ALTERNATE FOR THE LEAGUE OF CITIES ANNUAL MEETING RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council designate a voting representative and an alternate who can be present at the Business Session of the Annual League Meeting to be held on Saturday, October 8th at 10:30 a.m. at the San Francisco Moscone Convention Center West. BACKGROUND This year's Annual League Meeting is scheduled for Thursday, October 6 through Saturday, October 8, in San Francisco. At the Business Session, which is to take place on Saturday, October 8 at 10:30 a.m., the membership will be taking action on conference resolutions, which will guide cities and the League in an effort to improve the quality, responsiveness and vitality of local government within the State of California. The League is requesting each City designate a voting representative and an alternate to be present at the Business Session to vote on matters affecting municipal and/or League policy. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. R.ff,spec,.,ffull~ su,,~mitted, City Manager Attachment 1400 K Sr.E~'I 602 East Huntington Dr., Stc. C LEAGUE OF CAklFORNIA Sac~:~ to, CA 95814 Monrovia, CA 91016 }~ ~ ~ p.:{916} (,58-8200 pm(626) C I i I E S vx: (916) 658-8240 vx: {626) 305 1345 July 6, 2005 '~L Z~~ ~:~ To: The Honorable Mayor and Ci~ Council From: Pat Eklund, League President, Council Member, Novato Re: Designation of Voting Delegate for 2005 League Annual Conference The League's 2005 Annual Conference is scheduled for Thursday, October 6 throu.qh Saturday, October 8 in San Francisco. One very important aspect of the Annual Conference is the Annual Business Meeting where the membership takes action on conference resolutions. Annual conference resolutions guide cities and the League in our efforts to improve the quality, responsiveness and vitality of local government in California. It is important that all cities be represented at the Annual Business Meeting on Saturday, October 8th, at 10:30 a.m. at the San Francisco Moscone Convention Center West. To expedite the conduct of business at this important policy-making meeting, each city council should designate a voting representative and an alternate who will be registered at the conference and present at the Annual Business Meeting. A voting card will be given to the city official that is designated and indicated on the enclosed "Voting Delegate Form." Please complete and return the enclosed form to the League's Sacramento office at the earliest possible time (not later than Monday, September 6, 2005), so that proper records may be established for the conference. The city's designated voting delegate may pick up the city's voting card at the Voting Card desk located in the League registration area. The Desk will be open on October 6, 7, and 8. Voting cards should be picked up before the Annual Business Meeting on October 8th. The voting procedures to be followed at this conference are printed on the reverse side of this memo. Your help in returning the attached "Voting Delegate Form" as soon as possible is appreciated. If you have any questions, please call Lorraine Okabe at (916) 658-8236. LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES Annual Conference Voting Procedures 1. Each member city has a right to cast one vote on matters pertaining to League policy. 2. To cast the city's vote, a city official must have in his or her possession the city's voting card and be registered with the Credentials Committee. 3. Prior to the Annual Conference, each city should designate a voting delegate and an alternate and return the Voting Delegate Form to the League Credentials Committee. 4. The voting delegate, or alternate, may pick up the city's voting card at the voting card desk in the conference registration area. 5. Free exchange of the voting card between the voting delegate and alternate is permitted. 6. If neither the voting delegate nor alternate is able to attend the Business Meeting, the voting delegate or alternate may pass the voting card to another official from the same city by appearing in person before a representative of the Credentials Committee to make the exchange. Prior to the Business Meeting, exchanges may be made at the '~/oting Card" table in the League Registration Area. At the Business Meeting, exchanges may be made at the "Voting Card" table in the front of the meeting room. Exchanges may not be made while a roll call vote is in progress because the Credentials Committee will be conducting the roll call. 7. Qualification of an initiative resolution is judged in part by the validity of signatures. Only the signatures of city officials who are authorized to use the city's voting card, and who have left a sample of their signature on file for the Credentials Committee, will be approved. 8. In case of dispute, the Credentials Committee will determine the right of a city official to vote at the Business Meeting. T H C I T Y 0 F I I ]~ANCHO CUCAHONGA StaffR DATE: August 17, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Pamela S. Easter, Deputy City Manager lngrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF THE ADOPTION OF AN AMENDED AND RESTATED STATEMENT OF GOALS AND POLICIES FOR THE USE OF THE MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES ACT OF 1982 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt a motion to approve the amended and restated "City of Rancho Cucamonga Statement of Goals and Policies for the Use of the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982," a copy of which accompanies this staff report (the "Amended and Restated Goals and Policies"). BACKGROUND: The Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (Government Code Section 53311 and following) (the "Act") contains the statutory framework pursuant to which the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City") or any other local agency may form a community facilities district (each, a "CFD") for the purpose of financing the purchase, construction, expansion, improvement or rehabilitation of public facilities or the provision of certain authorized public services or maintenance. A CFD may finance such public facilities, services or maintenance through the levy of special taxes within the geographic boundaries of the CFD. Additionally, bonds secured by such special taxes may be issued for a CFD to finance such public facilities. In 1993 the Act was amended to provide that a public agency may initiate proceedings to establish a CFD only if such public agency has first considered and adopted local goals and policies concerning the use of the Act. Government Code Section 53312. 7. The City Council adopted its current statement of goals and polices (the "Existing Goals and Policies") in July 1999. A copy of the Existing Goals and Policies also accompanies this staffreport. Page 2 August 17, 2005 CONSIDERATION OF THE ADOPTION OF AN AMENDED AND RESTATED STATEMENT OF GOALS AND POLICIES FOR THE USE OF THE MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES ACT OF 1982 Triggered by a request received from the Etiwanda School District ("Etiwanda") that the City agree to enter into a Joint Community Facilities Agreement ("JCFA") and the anticipation that the City may receive requests from the owners of undeveloped property within the current city boundaries or possible annexation areas that the City form additional CFD's to finance public facilities and/or public services needed to serve the development of such properties, City staff has recommended that the City Council consider revisions to the Existing Goals and Policies. On July 6, 2005, City Council held a study session to review the Existing Goals and Policies and to discuss possible revisions to the Existing Goals and Policies. Following receipt of input from the City Council at the July 6th study session, City staff, together with the CFD financing team, developed the Amended and Restated Goals and Policies for consideration by the City Council. A comparison of the key provisions in the Existing Goals and Policies and the Amended and Restated Goals and Policies is attached as Exhibit A to this staffreport. The highlights of the proposed revisions may be summarized as follows: · Public facilities to be owned by the City or the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (the "District") will have priority for funding by any CFD formed by the City over public facilities to be owned by any other public agency; · Public facilities to be owned by the City or the District must provide a demonstrated public benefit; · The total tax burden (taxes plus assessments) on any residential owner-occupied parcel shall not exceed 1.85% of the estimated base sales price of such parcel upon completion of the public and private improvements. · Thc maximum special tax on parcels used or authorized to be used for residential purposes may not escalate. The maximum special tax on parcels used or authorized to be used for non-residential purposes may not be escalated more than 2% per year. · Prepayment of the full amount of the special tax obligation will be permitted; partial prepayments will not be permitted. · The City will not participate in a Joint Community Facilities Agreement ("JCFA") or Joint Powers Agreement ("JPA") with another public agency proposing to form a CFD unless: ° the proposed CFD complies with the sections of the Council's Amended and Restated Goals and Policies pertaining to equity of special tax formulas and Page 3 August 17, 2005 CONSIDERATION OF THE ADOPTION OF AN AMENDED AND RESTATED STATEMENT OF GOALS AND POLICIES FOR THE USE OF THE MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES ACT OF 1982 maximum special taxes, credit quality requirements for CFD bond issues and disclosure to prospective property purchasers in CFDs; the public facilities to be owned by such public agency will be financed by a larger share of the proceeds of the bonds issued for such CFD than the share of such proceeds to be used to finance the public facilities to be owned by the City; [] the City may require such public agency to deposit, or cause to be deposited, with the City funds sufficient to pay the costs of City staff and consultants to review the proposed CFD and the proposed JCFA or JPA; o disclosure to prospective purchasers within such a CFD shall clearly specify that such public agency is solely responsible for the formation of the CFD, the levy of special taxes within such CFD and the administration of the CFD and the bonds of the CFD; · Disclosure to prospective purchasers or lessees of property within a CFD formed by the City shall: [] provide for full disclosure of the special tax obligation for the CFD and any ad valorem, general and special taxes and any assessments, fixed lien or annual, affecting the property; the term of each tax or assessment and the projected annual amount of each tax or assessment; ° disclose the option to prepay the special tax obligation for the CFD to finance public facilities by the purchaser of such property; ° specify the name, title, telephone number and address of a representative of the City that may be contacted by a prospective purchaser or lessees for further information regarding the CFD [] disclose of the obligation of the City to initiate judicial foreclosure proceedings in the event of the delinquency in the payment of special taxes levied to pay debt service on bonds of a CFD. Such disclosure shall be in a form approved by the City Council; however, the City Manager will be responsible for approving the specific disclosure on such form for a particular CFD. · Specific procedures are established for the application to City to initiate proceedings to form a CFD including the necessity for the submission of an application and deposit to cover the costs of reviewing such application, the review of such application by a review committee to be established by the City Manager, the submission of the recommendation of the review committee to the City Council and the authorization by the City Council to initiate the proceedings to form a CFD. Page 4 August 17, 2005 CONSIDERATION OF THE ADOPTION OF AN AMENDED AND RESTATED STATEMENT OF GOALS AND POLICIES FOR THE USE OF THE MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES ACT OF 1982 If the City Council is satisfied with the Amended and Restated Goals and Policies as submitted, the City Council should consider the adoption of a motion to approve the Amended and Restated Goals and Policies. If the City Council desires to make amendments to the Amended and Restated Goals and Policies, the City Council may propose those amendments and consider a motion to adopt the Amended and Restated Goals and Policies as amended and restated or the City Council may refer the Amended and Restated Goals and Policies back to City staff for incorporation of such proposed amendments and direct that the Amended and Restated Goals and Policies, as so amended, be brought back to the City Council for approval. Respectfully submitted, Pamela S. Easter Deputy City Manager GIS/Special Districts Manager Attachments: Existing Goals and Policies Amended and Restated Goals and Policies Exhibit A Comparison of Key Provisions STATEMENT OF GOALS AND POLICIES FOR THE USE OF THE MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES ACT OF 1982 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................. 1 II. DEFINITIONS ................................................. 1 III. ELIGIBLE PUBLIC FACILITIES AND PRIORITIES ................ 1 IV. CREDIT QUALITY RI;QUIRED OF BOND ISSUES ................ 2 V. DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS ................................. 2 VI. EQUITY OF TAX ALLOCATION FORMULAS ..................... 2 VII. APPRAISALS .................................................. 3 VIII. EXCEPTIONS TO THESE POLICIES ................................... 5 STATEMENT OF GOALS AND POLICIES FOR THE USE OF THE MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES ACT OF 1982 · INTRODUCTION The City of Rancho Cucarnonga (the "City") has developed the following Goals and Policies on debt financing as guidelines to assist concerned parties in following the City's approach to community facilities district debt financing. It is the City's goal to support projects which address a public need and provide a public benefit. Proposed projects requesting community facility district debt financing will be evaluated to determine if such financing is financially viable and in the best interest of the City and current and future City and project residents. These Goals and Policies are designed to comply with Section 53312.7 of the Government Code, The City will consider applications requesting the formation of community facilities districts and the issuance of bonds to finance eligible public facilities pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended. The City reserves the right to request any additional reports, information or studies reasonably necessary in evaluating these applications. All City and any consultant costs incurred in evaluating applications requesting the establishment of co~m-nunity facility dislricts will be paid by the applicant(s) by advance deposit increments. The City shall not incur any non-reimbursable expense for processing such applications. Expenses not chargeable to the district shall be borne by the applicant. II. DEFINITIONS "Bonds" means bonds authorized and issued under the Act. "City" means the City of Rancho Cucamonga. "District" means a Community Facilities District formed under the Act. "Public Facilities" means improvements authorized to be constructed or acquired under the AcL "Value" or "Fair Market Value" means the amount of cash or its equivalent which property would bring if exposed for sale in the open market under conditions in which neither buyer nor seller could take advantage of a difficulty of the other and both have knowledge of all of the uses and purposes to which the property is adapted and for which it is capable of being used and of the enforceable restrictions upon uses and purposes. III. ELIGIBLE PUBLIC FACILITIES AND PRIORITIES The improvements eligible to be financed must be owned by a public agency or public utility, and must have a useful life of at least five (5) years. In any event, no Bonds shall be issued with a maturity date greater than the useful life of the facilities or improvements being financed. The development proposed within the District must be consistent with the City's general plan and must have received any required zoning or specific plan approvals. The list of public facilities eligible to be financed by a District include, but are not limited to, the following: -1- Local Park, recreation, parkway and open-space facilities Libraries Child care facilities · Other governmental facilities · Police & Fire Facilities In general, none of these types of facilities will have priority over the others; however, the City has final determination as to any facility's eligibility for financing, as well as the prioritization of facilities to be included within a District. IV. CREDIT QUALITY REQUIRED OF BOND ISSUES In evaluating a proposed Bond issuance, the City will require that the City's independent financial consultant review and report on the financial feasibility of the project to be financed. It is important to the City to minimize the possibility of default. Credit enhancements may be required by the City either to improve the credit worthiness of the proposed financing or to insure that the debt service requirements of the proposed debt issue are met in a timely mariner. The City will examine carefully the primary sources of payment of the Bonds as well as the provider of any required credit facility and the form that the credit facility will take. The rating of the provider, as well as the provider's capitalization, are of principal concern, and a reduction in either during the term of the credit facility to a level unacceptable to the City may require that an alternate credit facility be secured from an acceptable provider. The City reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to determine the acceptability of both the credit facility and its provider. V. DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS (1) The Act requires that certain disclosure certificates regarding the existence of a District and the special tax obligation be provided to those individuals purchasing property within the District. Ihe City will require that the statutorily prescribed disclosure be made to the initial purchaser of property within a District, and it will make available the information necessary to complete the disclosure certificate required for secondary transfers. (2) The City shall use all reasonable means to ensure compliance with applicable federal securities laws in connection with the issuance of Bonds and the provision of annual information regarding any District established by the City with respect to which Bonds have been issued, including requiring any developer whose development is material to the Bond issue to transmit appropriate information to the City or its designee for disclosure to Bond investors. VI. EQUITY OF TAX ALLOCATION FORMULAS The rate and method of apportionment of the special tax must be both reasonable and equitable in appotXioning the costs of the tmblic facilities to be financed to each of the parcels within the boundaries of the proposed Dislrict. The rate and method of apportionment of the special tax is to provide for the administrative expenses of the proposed District, including, but not limited to, those expenses necessary for the enrollment and collection of the special tax and Bond administration. All property not otherwise exempted by the Act from taxation shall be subject to the special tax. The rote and method of apportionment may provide for exemptions to be extended to parcels that are to be dedicated at a future date to public entities, held by a home owner's association, or designated open space. Ihe annual special tax levy on each residential parcel developed to its final land use shall be approximately equal each year, except that a variation for administrative expenses will be allowed. The City will allow an annual escalation factor on parcels within a District. The maximum annual special tax, together with ad valorem property taxes, special assessments or taxes for an overlapping financing district, or any other charges, taxes, or fees payable from and sec~ed by the property, including potential charges, taxes, or fees relating to authorized but unissued debt of public entities other than the City, in relation to the expected assessed value of each parcel upon completion of the private improvements to the parcel is of great importance to the City in evaluating the proposed financing. The objective of the City :is to limit the "overlapping" debt burden on any parcel to two percent (2%) of the expected assessed value of the parcel upon completion of the improvements. In evaluating whether this objective cm~ be met, the City will consider the aggregate public service needs for the proposed project. It will consider what public improvements the applicant is proposing to be financed in relation to these aggregate needs and decide what is an appropriate amount to make available in public financing to thc identified public improvements. This evaluation will be based in part on information obtained from other taxing entities that have jurisdiction to impose a levy on the affected parcels. Ihe total maximum annual special taxes that can be collected from taxable property in a District, taking into account any potential changes in land use or development density or rate, and less all projected administrative expenses, must be equal to at least one hundred ten percent (110°,4) of the gross annual debt service on any Bonds issued by or on behalf of the District in each year that said Bonds will remain outstanding. The rate and method of apportionment of the special tax may include a provision for a backup tax to protect against any changes in development that would result in insufficient special tax revenues to meet the debt service requirements of the District. Such backup tax shall be structured in such a manner that it shall not violate any provisions of the Act regarding cross- collateraiization limitations for residential properties. A formula to provide for the prepayment of the special tax may be provided; however, neither the City nor the District shall be obligated to pay for the cost of determining the prepayment amount which is to be paid hy the applicant. VI1. APPRAISALS (If Required) A. Definition of Appraisal. An appraisal is a written statement independently and impartially prepared by a qualified appraiser setting forth an opinion of defined value of an '3- adequately described property as of a specific date, supported by the presentation and analysis of relevant market information. B. Standards of Appraisal. The format and level of documentation for an appraisal depend on the complexity of the appraisal problem. A detailed appraisal shall be prepared for complex appraisal problems. A detailed appraisal shall reflect nationally recognized appraisal standards, including, to the extent appropriate, the Uniform Appraisal Standards for Federal Land Acquisition. An appraisal must contain sufficient documentation, including valuation data and the appraiser's analysis of the data, to support his or her opinion of value. At a minimum, the appraisal shall contain the following items: (l) The purpose and/or the function of the appraisal, a definition of the estate being appraised, and a statement of the assumptions and limiting conditions affecting the appraisal. (2) An adequate description of the physical characteristics of the property being appraised, location, zoning, present use, an analysis of the highest and best use. (3) All relevant and reliable approaches to value consistent with commonly accepted professional appraisal practices. Ifadiscounted cash flow analysis is used, it should be supported with at least one other valuation method such as a market approach using sales that are at the same stage of land development. If more than one approach is utilized, there shall be an analysis and reconciliation of approaches to value that are sufficient to support the appraiser's opinion of value. (4) A description of comparable sales, including a description of all relevant physical, legal, and economic factors such as parties to the transaction, source, and method of financing, and verification by a party involved in the transaction. (5) A statement of the value of the real property. (16) The effective date of valuation, date of appraisal, signature, and certification of the appraiser. C. Conflict oflnterest. No appraiser or review appraiser shall have any interest direct or indirect in the real property being appraised for the Agency that would in any way conflict with the preparation or review of the appraisal. Compensation for making an appraisal shall not be based on the amount of the valuation. D. District Appraisal Premises. The valuation of proposed Districts should be based on three premises: (1) Raw Land Value (Premise No. 1). The total land within the project is valued "as is" (a) With any existing infrastructure. (b) Without proposed infrastructure being financed. -4- (c) With existing parcel configuration. (d) Considering planned densities allowed by the specific plan of the pro.~ect. This is a typical t),pe of land valuation. (2) Proiect Build Out Value (Premise No. 2). The total land within the project is ,;alued under projected conditions: (a) With proposed infrastructure being financed completely. (b) At the plarmed densities allowed by the specific plan. (c) Land development is at the stage of being marketed to merchant builders or tentative tn'act maps ready to be filed. This is a pro. iected value based on project plans predicated on market conditions continuing as projected. (3) Bulk Land Value (Premise No. 3). The total land within the project is valued under projected conditions: {a) With proposed infrastructure being financed completely. (b) Wi'th existing parcel configuration. (c) Considering planned densities allowed by the specific plan of the project~ Ihis premise should consider a discounted or "quick sale" valuation considering time, costs, and the possibility ora per unit value based on the total size oftl~e project. VIII. EXCEPTIONS TO THESE POLICIES Ihe City may find in limited and exceptional instances that a waiver to any of'the above stated policies is reasonable given identified special City benefits to be derived from such waiver. Such waivers are granted only by action of the City Council based upon specific public purpose or health and safety findings. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATEMENT OF GOALS AND POLICIES FOR THE USE OF THE MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES ACT OF 1982 Amended and Restated August 17, 2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATEMENT OF LOCAL GOALS AND POLICIES FOR THE USE OF THE MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES ACT OF 1982 Introduction. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City Council") hereby amends and restates its goals and policies concerning the use of Chapter 2.5 of Part I of Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California (the "Act") in providing adequate public infrastructure improvements for the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"). The following amended and restated goals and policies shall apply to all Community Facilities Districts (each a "CFD") hereafter formed or proposed to be formed by the City and to requests from other public agencies for the City to enter into joint community facilities agreements pertaining to community facilities districts proposed to be formed by such public agencies. Any policy or goal stated herein may be supplemented or amended by resolution of the City Council. The purpose of this Statement of Goals and Policies is to provide the City staff, the residents of the City and the owners and developers of property located within the City with guidance in the application for and consideration of the establishment of community facilities districts within the City for the purpose of financing or assisting in financing the acquisition or construction of public infrastructure to benefit and serve either existing or new development or a combination thereof. It is also the purpose of this Statement of Goals and Policies to provide guidance to any other public agency considering the formation of a community facilities district to finance improvements to be owned by the City as well as such public agency regarding the criteria which the City Council will apply in considering the approval of a joint community facilities agreement with any such public agency. The underlying principals behind this policy are the protection of the public interest, assuring fairness in the application of special taxes to current and future property owners, assuring full disclosure of the existence of any special tax liens, insuring the creditworthiness of any CFD bonds, protecting the City's credit rating and financial position and assuring that applicants for all community facilities district proceedings other than City initiated proceedings pay all costs associated with the formation of any CFD. The scope of this policy is limited to the proposed formation of community facilities districts by (a) the City for the limited purpose of financing or assisting in financing the acquisition or construction of public infrastructure or to provide funding for services or maintenance or (b) any other public agency to finance improvements to be owned by the City. The City is under no obligation to issue CFD Bonds. The ability to issue CFD Bonds depends upon the particular facts and circumstances of each CFD. When issuing CFD Bonds, the developer must agree to cooperate in connection with any covenants or other requirements that may be necessitated by tax-exempt bonds. Priorities for CFD Financinfl/FundinR. The priority that various kinds of public facilities or services will have for financing or funding through the City's use of the Act is as follows: 1 (a). public facilities to be owned and operated by the City and or the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (the "Fire Protection District")that provide a demonstrated public benefit; and (b). public services to be performed by the City and or the Fire Protection District (c). public facilities to be owned and operated by a public agency other than the City or the Fire Protection District. Examples of a demonstrated public benefit may include, but are not limited to, the following: 1. Construction of a major public facility which meets a community need, e.g., a major arterial which will provide a vital roadway facility to alleviate congestion, park or recreational facilities intended to serve residents throughout the City, water storage facilities which will remedy inadequate fire flow, and storm drainage facilities which are a part of the storm drainage master plan. 2. Construction of public infrastructure sooner than would otherwise be required for a particular development project. 3. Construction of public infrastructure to serve commercial or industrial projects that will expand the City's employment and/or sales tax base. Equity of Special Tax Formulas and Maximum Special Taxes for CFDs. Reasonable Basis of Apportionment. Special taxes must be allocated and apportioned on a reasonable basis to all categories and classes of property (other than exempt property) within the CFD. Exemptions from the special tax may be given to parcels which are publicly-owned, held by property owners associations, used for a public purpose such as permanent open space or wetlands, or affected by public utility easements making impractical their utilization for other than the purposes set forth in the easement. Total Tax Burden. The total tax burden (that is, the anticipated maximum annual CFD special tax, together with ad valorem property taxes, special assessments, special taxes for any overlapping community facilities district, and any other taxes, fees and charges payable from and secured by the property) on any residential owner-occupied parcel in a CFD shall not exceed 1.85% of the estimated base sales price of such parcel upon completion of the public and private improvements relating thereto. Rate and Method of Apportionment. The rate and method of apportionment for CFD special taxes must be structured so as to produce special tax revenues sufficient to (a) pay scheduled debt service on all CFD bonds, (b) pay annual services or maintenance expense if applicable, (c) fund any amounts required to establish or replenish any reserve fund established for a CFD bond issue, and (d) pay reasonable and necessary annual administrative expenses of the CFD. Additionally, the rate and method of apportionment may be structured so as to produce amounts sufficient to fund (a) amounts to pay directly the costs of public facilities authorized to be financed by the CFD, (b) the accumulation of funds reasonably required for future debt service on CFD bonds, (c) amounts equal to projected delinquencies in special tax payments, (d) remarketing, credit enhancement or liquidity fees, and (e) any other costs or payments permitted by law. 2 In any case, the rate and method of apportionment must be structured such that the projected maximum special tax that could be levied in any fiscal year would produce special tax revenues at least equal to (a) 110% of projected annual debt service on all CFD bonds for the calendar year commencing in such fiscal year, plus (b) projected administrative expenses of the CFD for the calendar year commencing in such fiscal year. Generally, the rate and method of apportionment for CFD special taxes will be required to include a back-up tax to ensure that changes in development within the CFD would not result in the inability to levy special taxes that would produce special tax revenues in such amounts. Increases in Special Tax. The maximum special tax authorized to be levied on any parcel used or authorized to be used for residential purposes to finance the acquisition or construction of public facilities shall not escalate. The maximum special tax authorized to be levied on any parcel used or authorized to be used for non-residential purposes to finance the acquisition or construction of public facilities shall not escalate more than two percent (2%) per year. The increase in the special tax authorized to be levied on any parcel within a CFD as a consequence of delinquency or default by the owner of any other parcel may not exceed the maximum, if any, specified in the Act. The maximum special tax authorized to be levied on any parcel, whether authorized to be used for residential or non-residential purposes, to finance maintenance or services may be subject to annual escalation as provided for in the rate and method of apportionment of such special taxes to compensate for inflationary increases in the costs of providing such maintenance or services. Prepayment of Special Tax Obligation. Generally, the rate and method of apportionment of a special tax for a CFD will be structured so as to allow the prepayment of the full amount of the special tax obligation by property owners. Partial prepayments of the special tax obligation by property owners will not be allowed. Use of Special Tax Proceeds. Generally, the rate and method of apportionment of a special tax for a CFD may not be structured so as to permit the use of special tax coverage to reimburse a Developer for acquired public facilities. Credit Quality Requirements for CFD Bond Issues. All terms and conditions of any CFD bonds, including, without limitation, the sizing, timing, term, interest rates, discount, redemption features, flow of funds, investment provisions and foreclosure covenants, shall be established by the City. Each CFD bond issue shall be structured to adequately protect bond owners and to avoid negatively impacting the bonding capacity or credit worthiness of the City. Unless otherwise approved by the City Council, the following shall serve as minimum CFD bond requirements: Project Viability. The viability of the development project within a CFD is a critical component of the credit quality of a CFD bond issue. Accordingly, the viability of each such development project will be reviewed and evaluated by the City. Under most circumstances, the viability of a development project is enhanced as the project moves further through the development process. Therefore, generally, a CFD will be established only if tract or parcel maps for the development project to be undertaken therein have been approved by the City Council and the project is consistent with the City's General Plan. 3 Statutory Requirements. The City will require that the credit quality of any CFD bond issue be such that the requirements of Section 53345.8 of the Government Code will be met. Reserve Fund. In order to enhance the credit quality of CFD bond issues, the City will require that each such bond issue be secured by a reserve fund. Generally, each such reserve fund will be required to be funded (with cash or an acceptable reserve surety or other credit facility) in an amount no less than the least of (a) 10% of the initial principal amount of the bonds of such issue, (b) maximum annual debt service on the bonds of such issue, and (c) 125% of the average annual debt service on the bonds of such issue. Any reserve surety or other credit facility funding all or any portion of such a reserve fund will generally be required to be issued or guaranteed by an entity, the long term unsecured obligations of which are rated at least "A" by Moody's Investors Service or Standard & Poor's Ratings Service. Credit Enhancement. Where a substantial amount of the property within a CFD is undeveloped, the City may require credit enhancement to increase the credit quality of any bond issue for such CFD. The credit enhancement will be in the amount equivalent to two (2) years of debt service payments on the bonds as security for the amount of future special taxes to be paid. The credit enhancement shall remain in place until the special tax burden of the property owner providing the credit enhancement falls below 20 % of the aggregate special tax burden for such CFD. Capitalized Interest. Interest shall be capitalized for a bond issue only so long as necessary to place the special tax installments on the assessment roll; provided, however, interest may be capitalized for a term to be established in the sole discretion of the City Council on a case-by-case basis, not to exceed an aggregate of 18 months, taking into consideration the value-to-debt ratio, the expected timing of initial residential occupancies, expected absorption and build out of the project, the expected construction and completion schedule for the public improvements to be funded from the proceeds of the bond issue in question, the size of the bond issue, the development pro forma and the equity position of the applicant and such other factors as the City Council may deem relevant. Bond Structure. The term to maturity of any CFD bonds shall not exceed the maximum term specified in the Act. Principal amortization of CFD bonds shall commence no later than the end of the second bond year. CFD bonds shall be structured such that, once principal amortization thereof has commenced, debt service thereon will be substantially level. Limited Obligations. Neither the faith, credit or taxing power of the City shall be pledged to the payment of CFD bonds. The sole source of revenue for the payment of CFD bonds shall be the special taxes (net of a reasonable amount determined by the City to pay the annual costs of administration of the CFD and the CFD Bonds), capitalized interest, if any, credit enhancement, if any, and moneys on deposit in the reserve fund established for such bonds. Appraisals for CFD Bond Issues. The definitions, standards and assumptions to be used in appraisals required in connection with the City's use of the Act for CFDs are as set forth in the Appraisal Standards for Land Secured Financings published by the California Debt Advisory Commission and originally dated May 1994 and modified July 2004 (the "CDIAC Guidelines"). 4 $/5 Notwithstanding the foregoing, if there is a conflict between the definitions, standards or assumptions in the CDIAC Guidelines and the corresponding definitions, standards or assumptions in the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice of the Appraisal Foundation ("USPAP"), USPAP shall govern. Independent Absorption Study. An independent absorption study of any proposed residential development project within a proposed CFD shall be required for the formation of such CFD. The independent absorption study shall be used 1 ) as a basis to verify proposed base pricing of the residential units subject to the levy of the special tax and 2) to determine if the public financing of the public facilities is appropriate given the timing of development. The City may require an independent absorption study of any proposed industrial or commercial development within a proposed CFD. Additionally, the projected absorption rates will be provided to the appraiser for use in the appraiser. Disclosure for CFD Bond Issues. Initial Disclosure. Each owner of property within a CFD that has not reached its planned development stage and that will be responsible for the payment of special taxes representing a substantial portion (as determined by the City) of annual debt service on an issue of CFD bonds will be required to provide for inclusion in the official statement or other offering materials distributed in connection with the offering and sale of such bonds such information as may be required for the City to comply with, satisfy any requirements of, or avoid any liability under, any applicable federal or state securities laws. Continuing Disclosure. Each owner of property within a CFD, and each subsequent owner of property therein, that has not reached its planned development stage and that will be responsible for the payment of special taxes representing a substantial portion (as determined by the City) of annual debt service on an issue of CFD bonds will be required to provide such information, on an ongoing basis, as may be required for the underwriter of such bonds to satisfy the requirements imposed on it pursuant to Rule 15c2-12 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Joint Community Facilities Agreements/Joint Powers Authority. The City will not participate in a Joint Powers Authority nor will it enter into a Joint Community Facilities Agreement ("JCFA") or a joint exercise of powers agreement ("JPA") with regard to a CFD proposed to be formed by a public agency other than the City unless (a) the proposed CFD complies with the provisions of these Goals and Policies under the headings "Equity of Special Tax Formulas and Maximum Special Taxes for CFDs," "Credit Quality Requirements for CFD Bond issues," "Disclosure to Prospective Property Purchasers in CFDs" and such other provisions as the City Council may deem applicable to the proposed CFD and (b) the public facilities to be owned by such public agency will be financed by a larger share of the proceeds of the bonds issued for such CFD than the share of such proceeds of such bonds to be used to finance the public facilities to be owned by the City. The City may require that a public agency requesting that the City enter into a JCFA or a JPA deposit, or cause to be deposited, with the City such amount as the City Manager deems necessary to enable the City staff and City financing consultants to review the proposed CFD and proposed 5 JCFA or JPA to ensure compliance with the provisions of these Goals and Policies applicable to such CFD and such JCFA or JPA. All disclosures provided to prospective property owners within a CFD formed by another public agency in which the City has entered into a JCFA or a JPA shall clearly specify that such public agency is solely responsible for the formation of such CFD, the levy of special taxes within such CFD and the administration of such special taxes, the bonds of such CFD and such CFD itself. Such disclosures shall provide contact information for such public agency to which all questions regarding such CFD shall be directed. Such public agency shall provide a copy of all such disclosures to the City Manager. Disclosure to Prospective Property Purchasers in CFDs. The applicant for the formation of a CFD will be required to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City Manager (when the term City Manager is used herein it shall mean the City Manager or his designee) that there will be full disclosure, in a format satisfactory to the City Council, of the special tax obligation for such CFD and of any and all ad valorem, general and other special taxes and assessments, both fixed lien and annual, levied on individual pamels within such CFD to prospective pumhasers or lessees of property within such CFD, including merchant builders, residential homeowners and commercial or industrial purchasers or lessees. Such notice must include all of the following in addition to such other provisions as may be required by the Act or the applicant may deem necessary: (a). Provide for full disclosure of (i) the existence of the special tax obligation for the CFD and any ad valorem, general and other special tax obligations and any assessment, fixed lien or annual, applicable to the properties within the CFD (whether imposed by the City or any other public agency), (ii) the principal amount, if applicable, of the special tax obligation and any other applicable fixed lien assessment or special tax obligation, (ii) the term of each ad valorem, general or special tax and assessment and (iii) the projected annual amount of each such tax and assessment. (b). Disclose the option to prepay any special tax obligation for the CFD to finance public facilities or allow such special tax to be assumed by the purchaser of such property and the adjustment, if any, in the sales price of the homes or other property which will apply if the special tax lien is assumed by the purchaser. Provide the ability for the prospective purchaser to elect to exercise the option either to prepay such special tax obligation in full at or prior to the close of escrow or to have such special taxes levied annually on the property. Such disclosure shall be placed in all sales brochures, all other on-site advertising and all purchase documents. (c). Specify in all disclosure documents the name, title, telephone number and address of a representative of the City as provided by the City to the applicant who may be contacted by any prospective purchaser or lessee of property within the CFD for further information regarding the CFD and the special tax obligation. (d). Disclose the obligation, if any, of the City or the CFD to initiate judicial foreclosure proceedings against any parcel for which the payment of special taxes utilized to pay debt service on bonds of a CFD are delinquent. 6 The applicant must agree to provide an original copy of all applicable disclosure documents to the City prior to initiating property sales for review and comment by the City. Advance of Funds to Pay Formation and Issuance Costs, Except for those applications for community facilities districts where the City is the applicant, all City and consultant costs incurred in the evaluation of applications and the proceedings to form a CFD and issue CFD bonds therefore will be paid by the applicant by advance deposit with the City of moneys sufficient to pay all such costs. Each application for the formation of a CFD shall be accompanied by an initial deposit in an amount to be determined by the City Manager to be adequate to fund the evaluation of the application and undertake the proceedings to form the CFD and issue the CFD bonds therefore (collectively, the "Formation and Issuance Costs"). The City Manager may, in his or her sole discretion, permit an applicant to make periodic deposits to cover the Formation and Issuance Costs rather than a single lump sum deposit; provided, however, no such costs shall be incurred by the City in excess of the amount then on deposit for such purposes. If additional funds are required to pay required the Formation and Issuance Costs, the City Manager may make written demand upon the applicant for such additional funds and the applicant shall deposit such additional funds with the City within five (5) working days of the date of receipt of such demand. Upon the depletion of the funds deposited by applicant for Formation and Issuance Costs, all proceedings to form the CFD and/or issue the CFD bonds shall be suspended until receipt by the City of such additional funds as the City Manager may demand. The deposits shall be used by the City to pay for Formation and Issuance Costs incurred by the City incident to the evaluation of the application and the proceedings for the formation of the CFD and the issuance of the CFD bonds therefore, including, but not limited to, legal, special tax consultant, engineering, appraisal, market absorption, financial advisor, administrative and staff costs and expenses, required notifications, printing and publication costs. The City shall refund any unexpended portion of the deposits, after payment or provision for payment of all Formation and Issuance Costs previously incurred, upon the occurrence of one of the following events: (a). The formation of the CFD and the issuance of the CFD bonds; (b). The formation of the CFD or the issuance of the CFD bonds is disapproved by the City Council; (c). The proceedings for the formation of the CFD and the issuance of the CFD bonds are abandoned at the written request of the applicant; or (d). The CFD bonds may not be issued and sold. Except as otherwise provided herein, the applicant shall be entitled to reimbursement of all amounts deposited with the City to pay for Formation and Issuance Costs upon the formation of the CFD and the successful issuance and sale of the CFD bonds for the CFD. Any such reimbursement shall be payable solely from the proceeds of the CFD bonds. 7 The City shall not accrue or pay interest on any moneys deposited with the City. The obligation of the applicant to advance funds and the reimbursement of such funds all as provided for in this section shall be memorialized in a reimbursement agreement by and between the City and the applicant in a form satisfactory to the City Manager, City Attorney and bond counsel to the City. Selection of Consultants. The City shall select, in its sole discretion, and retain all consultants necessary for the evaluation of any application and the proceedings for the formation of a community facilities district and the issuance of the special tax bonds therefore, including, but not limited to, special tax consultant, bond counsel, financial advisor, underwriter, appraiser, and market absorption consultant after consultation with the applicant and consideration of any recommendations of the applicant. Development Ri.qhts. Properties proposed to be included in a CFD must have received such discretionary land use approvals as may, in the determination of the City, be necessary to enable the City to adequately evaluate the CFD including the properties to be included and the improvements proposed to be financed. The City will issue bonds secured by the levy of special taxes within a CFD only when (i) the properties included within such community facilities district have received those applicable discretionary land use approvals which would permit the development of such properties consistent with the assumptions utilized in the development of the rate and method of apportionment of the special taxes for such community facilities district and (ii) applicable environmental review has been completed. It is the policy of the City Council in granting approval for development such as zoning, specific plan or subdivision approval to grant such approval as a part of the City's ongoing planning and land use approval process. In granting such approval, the City reserves such rights as may be permitted by law to modify such approvals in the future as the City Council determines the public health, safety, welfare and interest may require. Such approval when granted is subject to a condition that the construction of any part of the development does not, standing alone, grant any rights to complete the development of the remainder of such development. Construction of public improvements to serve undeveloped land financed through a community facilities district shall not vest any rights to the then existing land use approvals for the property taxed for such improvements or to any particular level, type or intensity of development or use. Applicants for a CFD must provide an express acknowledgment of this policy and shall expressly waive on their behalf and on behalf of their successors and assigns any cause of action at law or in equity including, but not limited to, taking or damaging of property, for reassessment of property or denial of any right protected by USC Section 1983 which might be applicable to the properties to be assessed. Application Procedure for CFD's. Any application for the establishment of a CFD shall contain such information and be submitted in such form as the City Manager may require. In addition to such other information as the City Manager may require, each application must contain: 8 (a). Proof of authorization to submit the application on behalf of the owner of the property for which the application is submitted if the applicant is not the owner of such property. (b). Evidence satisfactory to the City Manager that the applicant represents or has the consent of the owners of not less than 67%, by area, of the property proposed to be subject to the levy of the special tax. (c). For any CFD proposed to finance improvements to benefit new development, a business plan for the development of the property within the proposed community facilities district and such additional financial information as the City Manager may deem necessary to adequately review the financial feasibility of the community facilities district. For any CFD proposed to finance improvements to benefit new development, the applicant must demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City Manager the ability of the owner of the property proposed to be developed to pay the special tax installments for the CFD and any other assessments, special taxes and ad valorem taxes on such property until full build out of the property. It is the intention of the City Council that applicants for a community facilities district have an early opportunity to have the application reviewed by City staff for compliance with this policy. In that regard, the City Council hereby directs the City Manager to create a CFD application review committee composed of such staff members and additional persons as the City Manager may deem necessary. The committee may meet with the applicant for the purpose of reviewing an application to form a CFD following the determination by the City Manager that the information contained in the application complies with the requirements of this policy. Following the review of such an application, the City Manager shall prepare and submit a report to the City Council containing the findings and recommendations of the committee regarding the application. Following completion of the committee report, the City Manager shall place the application on the City Council agenda for review. After review of the application and consideration of the committee report, the City Council shall determine whether or not to approve the initiation of proceedings to form the CFD. The decision of the City Council pertaining to the application shall be final. 9 EXHIBIT A CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATEMENT OF GOALS AND POLICIES FOR THE USE OF THE MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES ACT OF 1982 COMPARISON OF KEY PROVISIONS OF THE EXISTING GOALS AND POLICIES AND THE AMENDED AND RESTATED GOALS AND POLICIES Subject Matter Existing Goals and Policies Amended and Restated Goals and Policies Facilities Facilities Authorized to be · Must be owned by public · Public facilities owned by Financed agency orpublicutility City or Fire Protection · Useful life of 5 years or District that provide a more "demonstrated public · Permits financing of in benefit" tract facilities · Public facilities to be owned by other public agencies · Limits financing of in tract facilities unless "demonstrated public benefit" Priority of Financing Facilities · No priority · 1. City and Fire Protection District Facilities · 2. Public facilities to be owned by another public agency Special Taxes Basis of Apportionment of · Must be reasonable · Must be reasonable Special Taxes · No provision for · Provides for exemptions exemptions (doesn't for publicly owned prevent exemptions) property, home owner association property, permanent open space, etc Total Tax Burden · 2% of expected assessed · 1.85% of estimated base value of parcel upon sales price of a parcel completion of upon completion of public improvements and private improvements A-1 Subject Matter Existing Goals and Policies Amended and Restated Goals and Policies Rate and Method of · Maximum special taxes · No change Apportionment of Special Tax must equal 110% of gross annual debt service on bonds plus all projected administrative expenses Back up Special Tax · Required · No change Increases in Maximum Special · Not addressed Taxes for facilities: Taxes · Residential property - no increases permitted · Non-residential property - no more than 2% per year Taxes for services or maintenance - may increase to compensate for increases in costs of providing services or maintenance Prepayment · May be provided · Full prepayment permitted · Partial prepayment not permitted Use of Special Tax Surplus · Not addressed · May not be used to reimburse developers for acquired pubic facilities Credit Quality For CFD Bonds Establishment of Terms and · Not addressed · City to establish Conditions of Bonds Viability of development · Independent financial · City and independent project consultant to review financial consultant to · Project must be consistent review as part of with General Plan application review (see · Must have received below) required zoning or specific · CFD established only if plan approvals tract or parcel maps for project have been approved · Project must be consistent with General Plan Value to Debt Ratio · Not addressed - Govt · Expressly requires Code Section 53345.8 compliance with Section requires 3 to 1 ratio 53345.8 Reserve Fund · Not addressed · Required Credit Enhancement · May be required · Same A-2 Subject Matter Existing Goals and Policies Amended and Restated Goals and Policies Capitalized Interest · Not addressed · Generally - not to exceed period until special taxes can be collected on tax roll · Not to exceed 18 months Limited obligations · Not addressed · Faith, credit, taxing power of City not pledged · Special taxes sole source of repayment of bonds Bond Structure · Not addressed - Principal amortization to commence no later than end of second year · Debt service will be substantially level Appraisals Standards · Contains separate · Adopts appraisal standards standards of California Debt Investment and Advisory Commission for Land Secured Financings Independent Absorption · Not addressed · Required for residential Study project · May be required for non- residential projects Disclosure For CFD Bond Issues Initial Disclosure · City responsible for · Developers required to requiring developers to provide such information provide material as City requires or as is information required under securities law Continuing Disclosure · Not specifically addressed · Certain developers and property owners required to provide continuing disclosure Subject Matter Existing Goals and Policies Amended and Restated Goals and Policies Disclosure to Prospective · Must comply with · Must disclose all taxes and Propergy Owners statutory disclosure only - assessments, term of taxes applies only to special and assessments and taxes for CFD projected annual amounts of each · Must disclose ability of purchaser to prepay · Specify City staff to which questions may be dirccted Joint Community Facilities Agreements Compliance with City Goals · Not addressed · Must conform to policies and Policics re special taxes, credit quality for CFD bonds and disclosure to prospective property owners Funding Requirements · Not addrcsscd · CFD bond proceeds to fund facilities of lead agency must be greater than proceeds to fund facilities owned by City Cost of Review of JCFA · Not addressed · City may require lead agency to pay for City cost of review Disclosure to Prospective · Not addressed · Disclosure must specify Purchasers lead agency is solely responsible for CFD formation, administration and issuance of bonds · Must provide contact information for lead agency A-4 Subject Matter Existing Goals and Policies Amended and Restated Goals and Policies Application for CFD and Advance of Funds to Pay Formation and Issuance Costs Application Procedure - No formal process but City · Applicant must provide reserves right to request information specified in reports, information and Goals and Policies studies necessary to · Committee created by City evaluate application Manager to review applications and make recommendation to City Cotmcil · City Council must authorize initiation of proceedings to form Advance of Funds · Advance deposit required · Application must be accompanied by deposit · Requirement for deposit of additional funds as necessary %mended ~nd R~ ~ ~ est~ted Oty of Rancho Cucamonga Statement of Goals Po cies for the use of the MeHo-Roos Commumtv t acflmes of 1982 Presented by Warren Divert 3ira Fabian August ~F 2005 tubers o£ the Present,non evlew of City s ex~sting Statement o~ (,<:>als a~d } ol~c~cs for the t~.sc of ~:i~e Mello-Roos form Ct 13 No.__l)00 0i. (,1~ I) N<). 2)0( 4)2. CI 'I3 ~% & B . (.I'13 No. { 0.~ 0I (Series 2003 ~ & 2003 Recap <>f (J~t~ (.ouncfl S ~ Session held I 1 ' 2005 t' ' hV~ p <DI2 2 '~7 {): tO ( 1SC~S~' S exist~ and issues i~cing the City necessitatir~g l'C,X, 1S1OBS~ ~ t~,,,calamm' ' ' t~f Home~ >'i zlc~"=~ has resuked in ability, to ]cvs, hig~hei' bu~sd< n, ~ I)c~ cl~pc~s sck ctmo other 1 ub]~< s' 'as m~t ~o~ c mcnt~ k~ Cf D s ioca~cd v,~t ~m thc C~q, s botmda~c.. m ~ Chang>es in CI)I A( A > 0~aisal gukklincs si~oce adoptSon. City Council provided input to staff on the existing policies and issues impacting existing policies, City Council directed staff to bring back amended and restated policies for Deliberation at a future City Council Meeting. .~ Eligible Public Facilities and Priorities Equity of Special Tax Formulas and maximum Special Taxes Credit Quatity Requiremenis for CFD Bond Issues Appraisal Standards Disclosure Requirements Pohcles w~th Ame~}ded Pohcles related to ac htlcS. (Facilities authorized to be Fi~anced) Existin~ Amended Must be owned by public ~ PuNic fadiides owned by C~ty agency or public utility or Fire Protection D~strict that Useful life of 5 years or more p~ovide a demonstrated pubFc Permits financin9 of in tract beneFt facilities u Public faciiifies to be owned by Other public agencies ~ Limits finandn9 of in tract facilities unless there is 'demonstrated public benef't Comp~qrison of~ Kc) p~o'v~sions o£ existing Policies with Amended Policies zcl~tcd to C 2C i{'tCS, Pnormc~' ~ of f'mancmg E~stina Amende~ ~ No priority u ~. City and Fire Protection District Facilities ~ Publio facilities to be owned by another public agency ~£ Ke} pro~l~ ~ons of e×~stmS Policies ~,~2th~ /~me:~'}ded" Policies related to Special Taxes B~', ~ 5pp ' t) gxistin~ ~Amended~ Must be reasonable D Must be reasonable No provision for~ Provides for exemptions (doesn't exemptions for publicly prevent exemptions) owned property, home owner aSSOciation prope~y, permanent open space, etc Hddman Rob ~ Policies with Amended Policies related to ecia I axes, ( Total Tax Bm'den) ~st~ Amende~ D 2% of expected s ~,85% of estimated assessed value ofbase sales pdce of a parcel upon completion parcel upon completion of improvements of PUblic and private improvements ExistLn~ .Amend_ed Maximum special taxes L~ No change must equal t10% of gross annual debt service on bonds plus all proiected administrative expenses ' I iTlparlsorl of )<~e),~ pI'o~,lSlO~S oi exlStlng Policies w~th ~%~cndcd, ~ ' Policies related to Back up Tax) EX~tin~ Amended ~ Required ~ No change Pohc~es w~th Amer~ded Pohc~es related to Sp " axes. Increase in Maximum Special Taxes) Existir~ Amenae8 Not addressed n Yaxes for facilities: ~ Residenfia{ property- no increases ~ Non~tes~dent~a) property- no more than 2% per year ~ Taxes fo[ services or maintenance - may increase to compensate for increases costs of p~ovMing services or maintenance Policie?~ with ~mc~ded Policies related to CCI2 2XCS, Prepayments) ~xi6ti~ Amended May be provided ~ Full prepayment permitted a Paafal prepayment i~ot permitted c ~ison~ · o~' Ke~ pro~,isions~ ~ ~ o~- existin~ Policies with Amended Policies rehted to U se o~ Special Ta~ SurpI~s ) Not ~ddressed a M~y not be used to reimburse developers for acquired public facilities x>mpansor~ of I{,icx provisIoos of cx sling oho.~s x:~rb Amc~dcd Pol~c~cs l'cMtcd ~o ~rc(lt uahtv for I) Bon s: Tclm~' s an Cor~dInons of Bonds Existing Amend?____ d Not addressed ~ City to establish P<.>licics=' with Amended Policies i:elated to Credit Qualitv fei' ((~}::I3 Bonds: ( Viability of development ptx¢~ects. ) a {sdependest fisancia[ ~ City asd }adependest consultant to review financia[ consultant to u Project must be consistent revieW as pa~ of application with Genera} P{an rewew u Must have received ~ Project must be consistent required zoning or specific with General Plan plan approvals u CFD estaNished only if tract or parcel maps for project have been approved ( omparlson o~ Kes' prox isions o~ existing [ .>hc~es with Amended Pohcles related to Credit Qualit5 ~br Cli'D Bonds: Value to Debt~ Ratio) 'Exi~j~ Amended L~ Not addressed - Govt L~ Expressly requires Code SectiOn 53345.8 compliance with requires 3 to I ratio Section 53345.8 (;o~panson' ' of Kev. provisions of ex,sung Policies u~ith Amended Policies rehtcd to Credit' ' Quahty' , fo~' CFD Bonds: Rescn~e Fund ) ~xisting. ~en~e~ D Not addressed ~ Required 0 (~V 0\:i8iOI~R 0 BXISU~ Policies with Amended* ' ~ ~ Policies ~'elated to C~edit Qua~_~, fo~ (.t ~ Bonds: ('~edit. ' ' Einhancement ) Ex~sting Amended ~ May be required D Same Compaxison of Kev p~7ox ' )£ e isting Pohcles wit}2 Amended Policies related to C~'edit Qu~iit~ for CFI) Bonds: ('apitahzcd Interest Ex~st~ng Amende~ Not addressed o Generally - not to exceed 9er~od untfl spec~a~ taxes can be co~ected on tax Fol~ ~ Not to exceed ~ 8 months Policies with Amended Policies related to '"'"' C d' Q ~t5 ik C~ d re ~t ua y :>r ~I) Bo~-~ s: I imited obligations ~Fistin~ Arnonde~ s Not addressed s Faith, credit, taxing power of City not p~edged ~ Speda~ taxes so~e source of repayment of bonds C<~ mpar~son' of Ke~ p "-' of cxistirig,, ' Policies with A~ended Policies related to Credit 'aa for CFD Bonds: Bond Str-act'ure ) Existia~ Amended a Not addressed ~ Principal amodization to commence no }ater than end of second year ~ Debt service wi[} be substantially level Corn arison of Kex prov~s~on~ of ex~stmg Policies with Amended Policies related to Appraisals tad a~ s Existing 8men~ed ~ Contains separate a AdoPts appraisal standards standards of California Debt Investment and Advisory Commission for Land Secured Financings Pohclcs with Amended ~ onmcs related ndependcnt Absorption ~ tud~ E~__sting Amended Not addressed ~a Required for residentiaI project u May be required for nomresidential proiects ~x~mpar~sos prov~s~orts of ex~stmg Pol~cl. es v?~,th Ame~ded Pohc~es ~ela~ed to ~sclos~a~'e ior CFD Bond Issues: . . DisclosurO :Existing h~m~ded City responSible for s Developers required to req~idng developers to provide Such provide material ~nformation as City information requires or as Is required under securities law Co~ ~t~'~son ~ f Ke5 p~ovls~ons of cx~st~g Policies witt~ Amc~ded Polities mlamd to ~sclos~c for (}Fi) Bo~d 1. st~cs. (Continuing Disclosure)' ~ ,g~stin~ Amended ~ Not spedfica}ly ~ Certain developers and addressed property owners required to provide continuing disclosure ~()IT1 arlSOI-l, o e o-\ 1Sl()~ls ()~7 ex1Stl Pohc~es' v,,~th" Amended I~ohc~c~' '~s related to I)isclosu~:c ~br CFD Bond issues: (Disclosure to P~:ospecth Pt~opertx Existk~ Ameaded ~ Must comply w~th statutory ~ Must d~sdose a~l taxes and d~sdosum OalY - applies only assessments~ term of taxes aad to spec[at taxes for CFD assessments aad projected M~st d~sdose abiUty of purchaser to prepay ~ Specify G~ty Staff to which questions may be d~rected ~Standard~zed Pohcles' ' ~;~ith' Amended I>ohcle.' ~ ~ related to .~omt Cornmumr~ bacflmes A~rcemcnts, (('ompliance~ w, ith Cit)~ Coals)~ _Existin~g Amende¢~ Not addressed D Must conform to policies regarding special taxes, credit quality for CFD bonds and disclosure to prospective property owners (XI1 arlSOi] oe l'oViSlOl]S o Cxist-l~ Policies wkh Amended Policies related to Joint Community }:acilities %grcemcnts. ' !' qu' ) (}:~unc me: Re ~:cment~ ~isti~ Amended n Not addressed a CFD bond p~oceeds to fund facilities of bad agency must be 9rea/er than proCeeds to fund facilities owned by City Comparison oi Kc) pIoxlslons o£ existina Pohcles with Amended Policies related to Joint ColTlll~unit!¥ Facilities AgrecmenL,~-~ ~ ~' ~ost of rexlev,~ o ~,t'~ ~t~ Amended ~ Not addressed ~ City may require lead agency to pay for City cost of review F(]mp~rlson o£ Kev provisions o£ cx~stine~ Policies with Amended Pohc~es related to Joint Community l Caci~fics Agreements: ()SUre p~o~.pccu~ c Pu~cb:~sc~ s Existing Amen.__.._.._ tied D Not addressed ~ Disclosure must specify lead agency is solely responsible for CFD formation, administration and issuance of bonds u Must provide contact ~nformation for lead agency Policies with Amended Policies I:elatcd to ICatlO~S. and ad~ance' ~ <>i {~dnds: (' ' ' Procedure) '~,.ppl~cauon Existir!g Amended ~ No forma~ process but City u Applicant must provMe rese~es right to request information specified in GoaN reports, ~nformation and and Policies studies necessary to evaluate ~ Committee created by City applicstion Manager to review applications and make recommendation to C~ty Council u C~ty Council must authorize initiation of proceedings to form c}~ I~OV1Si()FIS 0 CX1Stll21~> Policies with Amcadcd I oi~cic, related to ~X~dvarice of }*unds) Existin~ Amended ~ Advance deposit~ Application must be required accompanied by deposit ~ Requirement for deposit of additional funds as necessary S p D 1 -~ .,stm~atcd ~t otal I ]£~cdx e T~× Rate Anal),' ,~sis~ ~or ~ detached single f~mity house ~ew Ho~e Ad Vatorem Property Tax $6~258 Fixed ASsessments City of Rancho Ct~camonga CFD $4~200 Other Assessments $ 668 Tota~ Annua~ Taxes $1 t~t 26 Base Sales Price $600,000 Tol-al Effecd~,e Tax Rate per proposed new cap