HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006/03/01 - Agenda Packet
5:30 p.m.
7:00 p.m.
THE CITY OJF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
10500 Civic Center Drive ~ Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730-3801
AGlEN][M.S
. Rt9cdJ~~~~(Q)IPlIl1l1l~II1l~ Agt9Ii1C~
. Cij~~ C(Q)I!.lJII1lCij~
IiaGUJLAR MlElE'fllNGS
1st and 3'd Wednesdays ~ 7:00 p.m.
MAR<ClHI 19 2006
AGENCY. BOAJIID &. CUY COUNCIL MEMBElRS
William J. Alexander.................... Mayor
Diane Williams............... Mayor Pro Tern
Rex Gutierrez........................ ....Member
L. Dennis Michael .....................Member
Sam Spagnolo.......................... Member
Jack Lam......................... City Manager
James L. Markman.............City Attorney
Debra J. Adams..................... City Clerk
(QRJ[)llER OF lEUSKNlESS
Closed Session. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. Tapia Conference Room
Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting. .. Council Chambers
Regular City Council Meeting. . . . . . . . . . . .. Council Chambers
~
INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC
fa
RANCHO
CUCAMONGA
TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL
The City Council encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length
of the Agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply
indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your
entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping,
booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from "the audience.
The public may address the City Council on any agenda item. Please sign in on the clipboard located at the desk
behind the staff table. It is important to list your name, address and phone number. Comments are generally
limited to 5 minutes per individual.
If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under "Public Communications". There
is opportunity to speak under this section at the beginning and the end of the agenda.
Any handouts for the City Council should be given to the City Clerk for distribution.
To address the City Council, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your
name for the record and speak into the microphone.
All items to be placed on a City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00
p.m. on Tuesday, one week prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's office receives all such items.
AGENDA BACK.UP MATERIALS
Staff reports and back-up materials for agenda items are available for review at the City Clerk's counter and the
Public Library. A complete copy of the agenda is also available at the sign in desk located behind the staff table
during the Council meeting.
LIVE BROADCAST
Council meetings are broadcast live on Channel 3 for those with cable television access. Meetings are
rebroadcast on the second and fourth Wednesdays of each month at 11 :00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. The City has
added the option for customers without cable access to view the meetings "on-demand" from their computers.
The added feature of "Streaming Video On Demand" is available on the City's website at www.ci.rancho-
cucamonga.ca.us/whatsnew.htm for those with Hi-bandwidth (DSUCable Modem) or Low-bandwidth (Dial-up)
Internet service.
The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the
Council Chambers Located at 10500 Civic Center Drive.
Members of the City Council also sit as the Redevelopment Agency and the Fire District Board.
Copies of City Council agendas and minutes can be found at http://www.ci.rancho-cucamonga.ca.us
. If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please
contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477-2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the
meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility.
Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired.
Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session.
8
RANcHO
CUCAMON
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
MARCH 1, 2006 -7:00 P.M.
THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY
HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
A. CALL TO ORDER
1.
Roll Call: Alexander _, Gutierrez_,
Michael _' Spagnolo _' and Williams
II
B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
1. Presentation of a Proclamation to Dave Kiedrowski, owner of Base
Line Hardware, for thirty years of service to our community.
2. Presentation of a Proclamation to Larry T. McNiel in recognition of his
service on the Rancho Cucamon9a Planning Commission.
3. Swearing-in of Planning Commissioner Luis Munoz by Mayor
Alexander.
II
C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
This is the time and place for the general public to address the City
Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any
issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may
receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.
Comments a,e to be limited to five minutes per individual.
II
D. CONSENT CALENDAR
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and
non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time
without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Council member
or member of the audience for discussion.
1. Approval of Minutes: February 1, 2006
February 15, 2006 (Special Meeting)
February 16, 2006 (Special Meeting)
2. Approval of Warrants, Check Register dated February 8 through
February 21, 2006, and Payroll ending February 21, 2006, for the
total amount of $5,080,478.81.
3. Approval of an appropriation in the amount of $50,000 from Park
Deveiopment (Fund 120) Fund Balance to Ace!. No.
11203055650/1519120-0 for the Pacific Electric Trail Phase III from
Archibald Avenue to Haven Avenue to cover the costs for landscape
design services.
1
I
]
II
II
1
26
G
RANcHo
CUCAMON
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
MARCH 1, 2006 -7:00 P.M.
THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY
HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
2
4. CONSIDERATION OF A PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY
DETERMINATION - DRC2006-00085 - Han Ma Eum Market - A
request to issue a Public Convenience and Necessity determination
for a Type 20 off-sale beer and wine license for an Asian food store in
the Community Commercial District, located on the southwest corner
of Foothill Boulevard and Ramona Avenue at 9849 Foothill Boulevard,
Unit M - APN: 0208-301-16
28
RESOLUTION NO. 06-053
34
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A
DETERMIANTION OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE
OR NECESSITY DRC2006-00085 FOR AN
ASIAN FOOD STORE IN THE COMMUNITY
COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED ON THE
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL
BOULEVARD AND RAMONA AVENUE AT
9849 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, UNIT M - APN:
0208-301-16
5. Approval of an Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and
Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B
and Street light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for DRC2005-
00086, located at 9300 Santa Anita Avenue, north of 41h Street,
submitted by Trico TCH, LTD.
RESOLUTION NO. 06-054
36
38
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITIES FOR DRC2005-00086
RESOLUTION NO. 06-055
39
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ORDERiNG THE ANNEXATION
OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DRC2005-00086
6. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities,
Monumentation Cash Deposit and Ordering the Annexation to
Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Light Maintenance
District Nos. 1 and 6 for Parcel Map 17063, located at 9359 Feron
Boulevard, east of Hellman Avenue, submitted by WF Construction,
Inc.
47
"
RANcHo
CUCAMON
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
MARCH 1, 2006 -7:00 P.M.
THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY
HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
3
RESOLUTION NO. 06-056
49
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NO.
17063, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT,
IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND
MONYUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT
RESOLUTION NO. 06-057
50
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION
OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAITNENANCE DISTRICT NO. 38 AND
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR PARCEL MAP 17063
7. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities for
Parcel Map 17303, located at the northwest corner of 4th Street and
Haven Avenue.
58
RESOLUTION NO. 06-058
60
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITIES FOR PARCEL MAP 17303
8. Approval to accept the bids received and award and authorize the
execution of the contract in the amount of $98,741.00 to the apparent
low bidder, International Pavement Solutions (CO 06-016), and
authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of
$9,874.10 for the ADA 2005/2006 Access Ramp and Drive Approach
Improvements at Various Locations, to be funded from Measure I
funds, Acct. No. 1176303-5650/1150176-0 and appropriate an
additional amount of $20,000 to Acct. No. 1176303-5650/1150176-0
from Measure I fund balance.
61
9. Approval of a Master Plan Transportation Facility Reimbursement
Agreement, SRA-29, (CO 06-017) in conjunction with the
development of Tracts 15711-1,15711-2 and 15711, located on both
sides of Miller Avenue between Etiwanda and East Avenues,
submitted by Pacific Communities, to be funded from Transportation
Reimbursement Acct. No. 1124303-5650/1026124-0.
66
"
RANcHo
CUCAMONG
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
MARCH 1,2006 -7:00 P.M.
THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY
HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
4
RESOLUTION NO. 06-059
68
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A MASTER PLAN
TRANSPORTATION FACILITY
REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE
RECONSTRUCTION OF BACKBONE
PORTIONS (MIDDLE 38 FEET) OF MILLER
AND ETIWANDAAVENUES, SRA-29
10. Approval of extension of an agreement with non-profit for the
operation of temporary job center (CO 04-013).
69
11. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 14759-1,
located at Ward man Bullock Road and Wilson Avenue, submitted by
Pulte Homes.
70
RESOLUTION NO. 06-060
73
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT
14759-1
12. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 14759-2,
located east of Ward man Bullock Road and south of Wilson Avenue,
submitted by Pulte Homes.
74
RESOLUTION NO. 06-061
76
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT
14759-2
13. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for DRC2003-
00302, located on the south side of Arrow Route, west of Hellman
Avenue, submitted by West Rock, LLC.
78
14. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for DRC2003-
00330, located at the southwest corner of 6th Street and Milliken
Avenue, submitted by Silver Oak Development.
80
15. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tracts 15727
and 15727-1,2,3, located at the intersection of Fourth Street and the
Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Channel bordered by Sixth Street on
the north, submitted by Cornerpointe 257/85, LLC.
82
"
RANcHo
CUCAMON
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
MARCH 1,2006 -7:00 P.M.
THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY
HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
5
16. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 16081,
located at the southwest corner of Victoria Park Land and Day Creek
Boulevard, submitted by Trimark Pacific - Day Creek, LLC
84
17. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance
Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for
improvements for Banyan Street Extension, located west of Day
Creek Boulevard and east of Rochester Avenue, submitted by Rancho
Etiwanda 685, LLC.
86
RESOLUTION NO. 06-062
88
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMRPVOEMENTS FOR BANYAN STREET
EXTENSION AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING
OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE
WORK
18. Approval to release Faithful Performance Bond No. 08739331 in the
amount of $157,325.90 for the Arrow Route Pavement Rehabilitation
from Archibald Avenue to Hermosa Avenue, Contract No. 04-168.
89
19. Approval to accept the FY 2005/06 Local Street Pavement
Rehabilitation - Overlay of Various Streets, Contract No. 05-074, as
complete, retain the Faithful Performance Bond as a Guarantee Bond,
release the Labor and Material Bond, and authorize the City Engineer
to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of
$1,019,267.84.
91
RESOLUTION NO. 06-063
94
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE FY 2005/06
LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT
REHABILITATION - OVERLAY OF VARIOUS
STREETS, CONTRCT NO. 05-074 AND
AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
20. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance
and Labor and Material Bonds, and file a Notice of Completion for
Citywide Street Name Sign Replacement, Phase 3.
95
RESOLUTION NO. 06-064
96
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR CITYWIDE STREET
NAME SIGN REPLACEMENT, PHASE 3, AND
AUTHORIZING THE FiLING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
Ii
RANcHo
CUCAMON
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
MARCH 1,2006 -7:00 P.M.
THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY
HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
6
II E. CONSENT ORDINANCES II
The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first
reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non-
controversial. The Council will act upon them at one time without
discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be
removed for discussion.
1. CONSIDERATION OF SECOND READING OF AN ORDINANCE TO
ESTABLISH PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN CITY
STREETS
ORDINANCE NO. 754 (second reading) 97
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA AMENDING SECTION 10.20020
OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY CODE
REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS
ON CERTAIN CITY STREETS
II F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS II
The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public
hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to
receive public testimony.
1. CONSIDERATION OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2004-
00269 LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY - A request to change 99
the land use designation from Community Commercial to Medium
Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) on 9.68 acres on the north
side of Foothill Boulevard, east of Etiwanda Avenue. APN: 1100-
161-04. Reiated files: Development Review DRC2004-00268,
Development District DRC2004-00270, Tentative Tract Map
SUBTT16882.
CONSIDERATION OF DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 99
DRC2004-00270 LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY - A request to
change the zoning designation from Community Commercial to
Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) within the Foothill
Boulevard Districts on 9.68 acres on the north side of Foothill
Boulevard, east of Etiwanda Avenue. APN: 1100-161-04. Related
files: Development Review DRC2004-00268, General Plan
Amendment DRC2004-00269, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16882.
m
RANcHo
CUCAMONG
II
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
MARCH 1,2006 -7:00 P.M.
THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY
HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
RESOLUTION NO. 06-065
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT DRC2004-00269, AMENDING
THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM
GENERAL COMMERCIAL TO MEDIUM
RESIDENTiAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER
ACRE) FOR 9.68 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED
ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL
BOULEVARD, EAST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE,
AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF-APN: 1100-161-04
ORDINANCE NO. 755 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2004-00270, A
REQUEST TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT MAP FROM COMMUNITY
COMMERCIAL TO MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-
14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) WITHIN
THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD DISTRICTS FOR
9.68 ACRES, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE
OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD EAST OF
ETIWANDA, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 1100-161-04
G. PUBLIC HEARINGS
The following items have no legal publication or posting
requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public
testimony.
1. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA AMENDING REGULATIONS
APPLICABLE TO THE ISSUANCE OF MASSAGE PERMITS.
BRINGING CITY ORDINANCE INTO COMPLIANCE WITH NEW
STATE LEGISLATION
ORDINANCE NO. 756 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING REGULATIONS
APPLICABLE TO THE ISSUANCE OF
MASSAGE PERMITS
7
173
177
II
181
183
"
RANcHo
CUCAMON
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
MARCH 1, 2006 -7:00 P.M.
THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY
HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
8
H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
The following items do not legally require any public testimony,
although the Chair may open the meeting for public input.
1. UPDATE ON 210 FREEWAY LANDSCAPING 185
2. UPDATE REGARDING AEROBATIC/STUNT PLANES IN THE
NORTHERN FOOTHILLS OF THE CITY (Oral Report)
II I. COUNCIL BUSINESS II
The following items have been requested by the City Council for
discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair
may open the meeting for public input.
1. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three
minutes per Councilmember.)
2. LEGISLATIVE UPDATE (Oral)
J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT
MEETING
II K. ADJOURNMENT II
I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my
designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing
agenda was posted on February 23, 2006, seventy two (72) hours
prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic
Center Drive.
February 1, 2006
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION MINUTES
A. CALL TO ORDER
The Rancho Cucamonga City Council held a closed session on Wednesday, February 1, 2006, in the
Tapia Room of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.
The meeting was called to order at 5:30 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander
Present were Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, L. Dennis Michael, Sam Spagnolo, Diane Williams and
Mayor William J. Alexander.
Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager; James Markman,
City Attorney; and Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Director; and Joe O'Neil, City Engineer.
* * 1< 1< 1< 1<
B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)
I
Mayor Alexander announced the closed session items:
B1. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8
FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE 14 ACRE FILIPPI WINERY SITE AT 12467 BASE
LINE ROAD - LINDA D. DANIELS, RDA DIRECTOR, NEGOTIATING PARTY - CITY (Related file,
Development Agreement and Master Plan - DRC2005-00361 ) - APN 227-161-10 and 1089-581-04
B2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL TO DECIDE WHETHER TO INITIATE LITIGATION
PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(c) - (ONE CASE) - CITY
* 1< 1< 1< * *
C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) I
No one was present to comment on the closed session item.
******
II
D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION
II
Closed session began at 5:35 p.m.
* * * * * *
E. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REpORTS
I
* * '" * * *
City Council Minutes
February 1, 2006
Page 2
II
F. RECESS
II
The closed session adjourned at 6:50 p.m. with no action taken.
'* '* * * * *
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Reqular Meetinq
II
A. CALL TO ORDER
II
A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, February 1, 2006, in
the Council Chambers of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga,
California. . Mayor William J. Alexander called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m.
Present were Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, L. Dennis Michael, Sam Spagnolo, Diane Williams and
Mayor William J. Alexander.
Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager; James Markman,
City Attorney; D. Craig Fox, Deputy City Attorney; Mike Nelson, Sr. Redevelopment Analyst; Larry
Temple, Administrative Services Director; Tamara Layne, Finance Officer; Sid Siphomsay, Information
Systems Analyst; Mike Toy, Information Systems Specialist; Dawn Haddon, Purchasing Manager; Joe
O'Neil, City Engineer; Dan Coleman, Acting City Planner; Mike Diaz, Sr. Planner; Trang Huynh, Building
Official; Dave Moore, Community Services Superintendent; Captain Pete Ortiz, Rancho Cucamonga
Police Department; Chief Peter Bryan, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Kimberly Thomas,
Management Analyst III; Shirr'l Griffin, Office Specialist II - City Clerk's Office; and Debra J. Adams,
Secretary.
******
B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
B1. A presentation of a Proclamation to the American Heart Association in recognition of "American
Heart Month" and their "Go Red Day for Women" campaign.
The Mayor and City Council presented the Proclamation to Rebecca Stafford, Volunteer & Executive
Director of Children's Fund.
B2. A presentation of Certificates to the RC Broncos Pee Wee Football Team in recognition of winning
their first youth football championship titie.
The Mayor and City Council presented Certificates to the coaches and team members.
******
C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
C1. John Lyons, Etiwanda area of City, reported the Mayor used to be a Pop Warner coach years ago.
He asked that items D8 and D9 be removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion. He brought up
City Council Minutes
February 1, 2006
Page 3
debris basins and the amount of water they can hold. He stated the Colonies in Upland made a debris
basin, but stated he is concerned about the residents in Upland being protected from a flood. He wasn't
sure the developer was concerned about Upland or Rancho Cucamonga residents. He talked about flood
insurance he used to have on his home and felt people near the Colonies wiil have to purchase flood
insurance in order to be protected. He did not think this area should be developed because it is in the
middle of a flood basin. He felt Rancho Cucamonga should be concerned about this also.
C2. Bill McCliman brought up the Fire Strategic Plan that was presented by the Fire Chief some time
back. He did not feel the public could be safe unless this Plan is implemented. He asked where this
stands.
Mayor Alexander stated there is a meeting scheduled for February 23'" at 5:00 p.m. to discuss this.
Mr. McCliman stated he had previously asked that a letter be sent to the County requesting that
the newly hired deputies be sent to Rancho Cucamonga, and asked if this was done.
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated a contracting agency of the County can have as many officers as it wants
as long as they pay for them.
C3. Hilda Phillips, Terra Vista area, brought up earthquake safety. She said she attended a meeting in
Claremont last week about this. She mentioned some points that were brought up in this meeting
regarding earthquake safety and shared them with the audience.
* * * * * *
II
D. CONSENT CALENDAR
~I
D1. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 1/11/06 through 1/24/06 and Payroll ending 1/24/06 for the
total amount of $5,561 ,286.01.
D2. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Bridge Maintenance and
Rehab Project at Heritage Park, to be funded from Park fees.
RESOLUTION NO. 06-023
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFI
CATIONS FOR THE "BRIDGE MAINTENANCE AND REHAB PROJECT
AT HERITAGE PARK" AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE
CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
D3. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bid~" for the Fisher Drive Landscape
Improvements, to be funded from Beautification Fees and Developer Trust Deposit.
,
RESOLUTION NO. 06-024
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "FISHER DRIVE LANDSCAPE
IMPROVEMENTS" AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY
CLERK TO ADEVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
City Council Minutes
February 1, 2006
Page 4
D4. Approval to appropriate an additional $110,000 from Community Development Technical Services
Fund 016 into Acct. No. 1001314-5303 (Contract Services Reimbursable) to continue contract terms for
two (2) contract planners through the end of FY 2005-2006.
D5. Approval of an appropriation in the amount of $25,000 from Measure I Fund Balance to Account No.
11763035650/1532176-0 for the Base Line Road and East Avenue Street Rehabilitation Improvements in
cooperation with the City of Fontana.
D6. Approval to accept grant revenue in the amount of $19,514.00 from the United States Department of
Justice 2006 Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Award into Acct. No. 13540000-4740 (Grant Income) for use
by the Police Department for the purchase of police-related equipment and technology (14 hand-held
radar guns for use by the Traffic Division to enforce vehicle code violations).
D7 Approval to appropriate the Animal Care and Services Departmental Budget for partial year
operations for FY 2005/06 (personnel costs of $466,060 and operating costs of $224,980) for one-time
start-up costs ($1,381,230) and for capital costs ($1,996,900) in the total amount of $4,069,170 into
various accounts as detailed in the attached budget summary which was approved by City Councii on
December 13, 2005.
D8. Approval of the execution of various contracts for the purchase of furniture, fixtures, equipment and
professional services for the Rancho Cucamonga Animal Care and Services Department. REMOVED
FOR DISCUSSION BY JOHN LYONS
D9. Approval of a Resolution authorizing the emergency procurement of construction and construction
management services for facility repairs, modifications and improvements to the Rancho Cucamonga
Animal Shelter (CO Nos. 06-005, 06-006, 06-007). REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION BY JOHN LYONS
RESOLUTION NO. 06-025
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE
EMERGENCY PROCUREMENT OF CONSTRUCTION AND
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES WITHOUT
COMPETITIVE BIDDING FOR FACILITY REPAIRS, MODIFICATIONS
AND IMPROVEMENTS TO THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA ANIMAL
SHELTER, LOCATED AT 11780 ARROW ROUTE
D10. Approval of the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1 and Street Lighting
Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 for 8395 Chaffee Street iocated on the south side of Chaffee Street
west of Baker Avenue, submitted by Miguel Rodriguez.
RESOLUTION NO. 06-026
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF
CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1
AND 2 FOR 8395 CHAFFEE STREET (APN: 0207-541-52)
011. Approval of Map and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District NO.7 and Street
Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 7 for Tract No. 14759-2 iocated at Wardman Bullock Road and
Wilson Avenue submitted by Pulte Homes - APN: 226-102-17
RESOLUTION NO. 06-027
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER
14759-2
\
City Council Minutes
February 1, 2006
Page 5
RESOLUTION NO. 06'028
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF
CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NOS. 7 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1
AND 7 FOR TRACT MAP NO. 14759-2
D12. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to
Landscape Maintenance District NO.7 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 7 for Tract No.
14759-3, located at Wardman Bullock Road and Wilson Avenue, submitted by Pulte Homes - APN: 226-
102-17.
RESOLUTION NO. 06-029
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENTS AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR TENTATIVE
TRACT 14759-3
RESOLUTION NO. 06-030
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF
CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 7 AND STREET LIGHTING MAITNENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1
AND 7 FOR TRACT NO. 14759-3 (APN: 226-102-17)
D13. Approval to accept Improvements, retain the Faithful Performance Bond in lieu of a Maintenance
Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for DRC2002-00864, located on the west side of
White Oak Avenue north of Elm Avenue, submitted by Allyn B. Scheu and L. & J Scheu Living Trust.
RESOLUTION NO. 06-031
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMRPVOEMENTS FOR DRC2002-00864 AND AUTHORIZING THE
FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
014. Approval to release all Maintenance Guarantee Bonds for Tract 15727, 15727-6 and 15727-8
located north of Fourth Street and east of the Cucamonga Creek Channel, submitted by Cornerpointe
257, LLC.
D15. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Cash Deposit for DR 00-19, located at 10905 Jersey
Boulevard, submitted by Hoffinger Industries, Incorporated.
MOTION: Moved by Spagnolo, seconded by Williams to approve the staff recommendations in the staff
reports contained within the Consent Calendar with the exception of items 8 and 9. Motion carried
unanimously 5-0.
DISCUSSION OF ITEMS DB AND D9 as requested by John Lyons.
DB.Approval of the execution of various contracts for the purchase of furniture, fixtures,
equipment and professional services for the Rancho Cucamonga Animal Care and Services
Department.
09. Approval of a Resolution authorizing the emergency procurement of construction and
construction management services for facility repairs, modifications and improvements to the
Rancho Cucamonga Animal Shelter (CO Nos. 06-005, 06-006, 06-007).
City Council Minutes
February 1, 2006
Page 6
A staff report was presented by Kimberly Thomas, Management Analyst III.
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated this is a clean-up item and it is required to take these official actions.
MOlTON: Moved by Spagnolo, seconded by Williams to approve items D8 and D9. Motion carried
unanimously 5-0.
******
II
E. CONSENT ORDINANCES
II
No items submitted.
." * ."."." *
II
F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
II
F1. CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION AMENDING THE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 94-01 AND ENTERTAINMENT
PERMIT 91-03 FOR MARGARITA BEACH. LOCATED AT 9950 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD APN: 1077-
621-34 (CONTINUED FROM JANUARY 18, 2006)
Mayor Alexander recused himself because of a conflict he has with this matter as he has done at
previous meetings. He left the Council Chamber.
James Markman, City Attorney, stated there is a certified shorthand reporter assisting the City Clerk with
the preparation of the minutes for this matter. (see attached verbatim transcript).
MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Michael to sustain the appeal with modifications to the
Planning Commission Resolution, with the appropriate Resolution coming back at the February 15, 2006
meeting confirming same. Motion carried 3-1-0-1 (Spagnolo voted no, Alexander abstained).
********
A recess was taken at 11 :21 p.m. The meeting was called back to order at 11 :30 with all
Councilmembers present.
********
F2. APPROVAL TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION TO ESTABLISH AND/OR INCREASE THE FOLLOWING
ENGINEERING-RELATED FEES AND FEES IN THE FOLLOWING FEE CATEGORIES: APPLICATION
FEES (MISCELLANEOUS), UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING FEES. PARK DEVELOPMENT FEES
(INCLUDING "QUIMBY" AND IMPACT FEES). PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION PERMIT FEES. MAP
AND IMPROVEMENT PLAN CHECKING FEES AND ETIWANDA DRAINAGE AREA (MASTER 9) FEES
A staff report was presented by Joe O'Neil, City Engineer.
Mayor Alexander opened the public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed.
City Councii Minutes
February 1, 2006
Page 7
RESOLUTION NO. 06-032
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A RESOLUTION TO
ESTABLISH AND/OR INCREASE THE FOLLOWING ENGINEERING-
RELATED FEES AND FEES IN THE FOLLOWING FEE CATEGORIES:
APPLICATION FEES (MISCELLANEOUS), UTILITY UNDER-
GROUNDING FEES, PARK DEVELOPMENT FEES (INCLUDING
"QUIMBY" AND IMPACT FEES), PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION
PERMIT FEES, MAP AND IMPROVEMENT PLAN CHECKING FEES
AND ETIWANDA DRAINAGE AREA (MASTER 9) FEES
MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Michael to approve Resolution No. 06-032. Motion carried
unanimously 5-0.
* * * * '* *
[I
G. PUBLIC HEARINGS
II
No items submitted.
******
H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REpORTS
No items submitted.
******
II
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
II
11. LEGISLATIVE UPDATES (Oral)
Councilmember Williams wanted to thank Senator Dutton who is carrying legislation on the $26 biilion for
the transportation proposal from the Governor. She stated this is part of the Strategic Growth Plan. She
stated Senator Dutton has introduced Senate Sill 1165, which will facilitate the proposed key
transportation infrastructure investments, especially in the Inland Empire. She also stated
Assemblymember Bill Emerson was just honored by his colleagues as Republican Whip. She felt we
were very fortunate to have very strong legislative representatives in Sacramento.
******
J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
I
No items were identified for the next meeting.
'* '* '* * * '*
City Council Minutes
February 1, 2006
Page 8
K. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Michael to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. The
meeting adjourned at 11 :33 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Debra J. Adams, CMC
City Clerk
Approved: .
February 15, 2006
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
SPECIAL MEETING
II
A. CALL TO ORDER
II
A special meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, February 15, 2006,
in the Tri Communities Room at City Hall located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga,
California. Mayor William J. Alexander called the meeting to order at 4:00 p.m.
Present were Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez (arrived at 4:03 p.m.); L. Dennis Michael, Sam Spagnolo,
Diane Williams, and Mayor William J. Alexander.
Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager; James Markman,
City Attorney; Dan Coleman, Acting City Planner; Lois Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary; Kathy
Scott, Deputy City Clerk; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk.
******
II
B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
II
No communication was made from the public.
******
C. ITEM(S) OF BUSINESS
C1. PLANNING/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSIONER INTERVIEWS
Mayor Alexander stated the following three questions would be asked of each candidate. They were:
1. In light of the scarcity of vacant land, how would you balance the community's need for affordable
housing with potential public controversy (NIMBY - "Not in My Backyard").
2. Please share your view of historic preservation.
3. How do you maintain objectivity in your decision-making process?
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated the City Council can have discussion about each candidate. He stated
once a motion has been made to appoint one of the candidates, it is a state law requirement that the
Mayor votes "yes" on that motion. The Council would be required to keep voting until the Mayor votes
"yes" on the motion.
The following candidates were interviewed:
4:00 p.m.
4:15 p.m.
4:30 p.m.
4:45 p.m.
5:00 p.m.
5:15p.m.
5:30 p.m.
5:45 p.m.
Steve Gonzales
Firat Tuncay
Brad Buller
Luis Munoz Jr.
James Moffatt
Ron Stark
Maria Elena Kennedy
Dieter Carios Dammeier
Special City Council Special Meeting Minutes
February 15, 2006
Page 2
2. SELECTION OF PLANNING/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEMBER TO FILL ONE
SEAT
The Council was asked to vote their top thre.e choices on the matrix provided to them. The City Clerk
posted all votes cast on the ftip chart.
MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Michael to appoint Luis Munoz, Jr. Motion carried
unanimously 5-0.
." 1r..." * *
II
D. ADJOURNMENT
II
The meeting adjourned at 5:43 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Debra J. Adams, CMC
City Clerk/Records Manager
Approved: *
February 16, 2006
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
SPECIAL MEETING
I
A. CALL TO ORDER
A special meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was scheduled for Thursday, February 16,
2006, in the Tapia Room at City Hall located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga,
California.
Due to lack of quorum, the meeting was canceled.
Respectfully submitted,
Debra J. Adams, CMC
City Clerk/Records Manager
Approved: .
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
2/8/2006 through 2/21/2006
Check No.
Check Date Vendor Name
Amount
AP - 00232883 2/8/2006 ABLAC
AP - 00232884 2/8/2006 ADAMSON, RONALD
AP - 00232884 2/8/2006 ADAMSON, RONALD
AP - 00232884 2/8/2006 ADAMSON, RONALD
AP - 00232884 2/8/2006 ADAMSON, RONALD
AP - 00232885 2/8/2006 AHN, HOUNAM
AP - 00232887 2/8/2006 AJILON FINANCE
AP - 00232888 2/8/2006 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC
AP - 00232889 2/8/2006 ALTA FIRE EQUIPMENT CO
AP - 00232890 2/8/2006 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL
AP - 00232891 2/8/2006 ALTA LOMA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATES
AP - 00232892 2/8/2006 AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION
AP - 00232893 2/8/2006 AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION
AP - 00232894 2/8/2006 AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION
AP - 00232895 2/8/2006 AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION
AP - 00232896 2/8/2006 AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION
AP - 00232897 2/8/2006 ARCHIBALD PET HOSPITAL
AP - 00232898 2/8/2006 BAKER, JANA
AP - 00232899 2/8/2006 BARNES AND NOBLE
AP - 00232900 2/8/2006 BERGERON, BOB
AP - 00232901 2/8/2006 BILL BLANCHARDS LITTLE BIG BAND
AP - 00232902 2/8/2006 BROOMFIELD, DIANE
AP - 00232903 2/8/2006 BRUNSWICK DEER CREEK LANES
AP - 00232904 2/8/2006 BURR CYCLES INC, JOHN
AP - 00232904 2/8/2006 BURR CYCLES INC, JOHN
AP - 00232904 2/8/2006 BURR CYCLES INC, JOHN
AP - 00232904 2/8/2006 BURR CYCLES INC, JOHN
AP - 00232904 2/8/2006 BURR CYCLES INC, JOHN
AP - 00232905 2/8/2006 CALIFORNIA TRAVEL AND TOURISM
AP - 00232906 2/8/2006 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF
AP - 00232907 2/8/2006 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF
AP - 00232908 2/8/2006 CARRILLO, TRINA
AP - 00232909 2/8/2006 CASILLAS, TONY
AP - 00232910 2/8/2006 CENDEJAS, EILEEN
AP - 00232912 2/8/2006 CHRISTIAN OKOYE FOUNDATION, THE
AP - 00232913 2/8/2006 CLARK, KAREN
AP - 00232914 2/8/2006 CNOA REGION V
AP - 00232915 2/8/2006 COLE, KAREN
AP - 00232916 2/8/2006 COLOR ME MINE
AP - 00232917 2/8/2006 COMBINED MARTIAL SCIENCE INC
AP - 00232918 2/8/2006 CORTES, REGINA
AP - 00232919 2/8/2006 COURT TRUSTEE
AP - 00232920 2/8/2006 COURT TRUSTEE
AP - 00232921 2/8/2006 CPOA
AP - 00232922 2/8/2006 CST CORPORATION
AP - 00232924 2/8/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
AP - 00232924 2/8/2006 CUCAMONGA V ALLEY WATER DISTRICT
AP - 00232924 2/8/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
AP - 00232924 2/8/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
AP - 00232924 2/8/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
AP - 00232924 2/8/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
AP - 00232924 2/8/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
AP - 00232924 2/8/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
AP - 00232924 2/8/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
--- ------ --~._-- --- ------
User: KFINCHER - Karen Fincher Page: I
Report:CK _AGENDA_REG _PORTRAIT _ RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
274.94
594.00
528.00
495.00
594.00
65.00
892.92
14,527.77
46.21
350.00
5,550.00
380.00
250.00
340.00
250.00
200.00
100.00
18.00
473.02
106.00
400.00
57.00
346.50
225.00
434.20
878.70
327.37
819.46
450.00
22.50
37.50
435.00
521.00
48.00
500.00
91.00
270.00
76.00
143.00
2,791.20
1,899.35
118.50
200.00
40.00
191.27
417.68
280.88
146.48
67.28
64.88
492.08
429.68
300.08
1,443.68
----
Current Date: 02/22/;
1 Time: ]5:2
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Al!enda Check Rel!ister
2/8/2006 through 2/21/2006
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00232924 2/8/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRlCT 246.32
AP - 00232924 2/8/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRlCT 138.28
AP - 00232924 2/8/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRlCT 1,447.03
AP - 00232924 2/8/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRlCT 463.08
AP - 00232924 2/8/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 596.48
AP - 00232924 2/8/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRlCT 117.08
AP - 00232924 2/8/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRlCT 1,566.67
AP - 00232924 2/8/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 484.28
AP - 00232924 2/8/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRlCT 55.20
AP - 00232924 2/8/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,480.63
AP - 00232924 2/8/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRlCT 304.88
AP - 00232924 2/8/2006 CUCAMONGA V ALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.60
AP - 00232924 2/8/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,131.99
AP - 00232924 2/8/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEYWATERDISTRlCT 73.60
AP - 00232924 2/8/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRlCT 74.68
AP - 00232924 2/8/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRlCT 149.48
AP - 00232924 2/8/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRlCT 105.68
AP - 00232924 2/8/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRlCT 219.68
AP - 00232924 2/8/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRlCT 109.28
AP - 00232924 2/8/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRlCT 123.68
AP - 00232924 2/8/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRlCT 45.38
AP - 00232924 2/8/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 139.28
AP - 00232924 2/8/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 364.88
AP - 00232924 2/8/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATERDISTRlCT 139.88
AP - 00232924 2/8/2006 CUCAMONGA V ALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.60
AP - 00232924 2/8/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRlCT 129.94
AP - 00232924 2/8/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRlCT 55.20
AP - 00232924 2/8/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRlCT 5,768.18
AP - 00232924 2/8/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRlCT 669.60
AP - 00232924 2/8/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 236.43
AP - 00232924 2/8/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRlCT 61.28
AP - 00232924 2/8/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRlCT 151.88
AP - 00232924 2/8/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRlCT 109.88
AP - 00232924 2/8/2006 CUCAMONGA V ALLEY WATER DISTRICT 253.88
AP - 00232924 2/8/2006 CUCAMONGA V ALLEY WATER DISTRICT 121.88
AP - 00232924 2/8/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRlCT 156.08
AP - 00232924 2/8/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRlCT 144.08
AP - 00232924 2/8/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRlCT 126.08
AP - 00232924 2/8/2006 CUCAMONGA V ALLEY WATER DISTRlCT 250.28
AP - 00232924 2/8/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRlCT 910.03
AP - 00232924 2/8/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRlCT 61.28
AP - 00232924 2/8/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 128.48
AP - 00232924 2/8/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 364.28
AP - 00232924 2/8/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRlCT 943.76
AP - 00232924 2/8/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRlCT 73.60
AP - 00232924 2/8/2006 CUCAMONGA V ALLEY WATER DISTRlCT 666.08
AP - 00232924 2/8/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRlCT 265.28
AP - 00232924 2/8/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 197.98
AP - 00232925 2/8/2006 CUCAMONGA VENTURES 1,000.00
AP - 00232926 2/8/2006 DAGHDEVIRlAN, KATHY 996.30
AP - 00232927 2/8/2006 DANCE TERRIFIC 2,485.00
AP - 00232928 2/8/2006 DAPPER TIRE CO 77.76
AP - 00232928 2/8/2006 DAPPER TIRE CO 39.23
AP - 00232928 2/8/2006 DAPPER TIRE CO 90.67
--- ----- ------ ---~-- -------
User: KFINCHER - Ka,en Fincher Page: 2 Current Date: 02/22/;
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Registe, Portrait Layout Z Time: 15:2
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Al!enda Check Rel!ister
2/8/2006 through 2/21/2006
Check No.
Check Date Vendor Name
Amount
AP - 00232929 2/8/2006 DELANY, DANI
AP - 00232930 2/812006 DELTA DENTAL
AP - 00232931 2/8/2006 DESIGNIT INC
AP - 00232932 2/8/2006 DRACHAND, DI ANNE
AP - 00232933 2/812006 DUFFY, RICK
AP - 00232934 2/8/2006 EASTON SPORTS DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATlm
AP - 00232935 2/8/2006 EGGERS, ROBERT A.
AP - 00232936 2/8/2006 EXCLUSIVE EMAGES
AP - 00232937 2/8/2006 F S MOTOR SPORTS INC
AP - 00232938 2/812006 F S MOTOR SPORTS INC
AP - 00232939 2/8/2006 F S MOTOR SPORTS INC
AP - 00232941 . 2/812006 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES
AP - 00232941 2/812006 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES
AP - 00232941 2/812006 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES
AP - 00232941 2/812006 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES
AP - 00232941 2/812006 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES
AP - 00232941 2/812006 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES
AP - 00232941 2/812006 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES
AP - 00232941 2/812006 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES
AP - 00232941 2/812006 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES
AP - 00232942 2/812006 FORD OF UPLAND INC
AP - 00232942 2/812006 FORD OF UPLAND INC
AP - 00232942 2/8/2006 FORD OF UPLAND INC
AP - 00232943 2/812006 FRED PRYOR SEMINARS
AP - 00232944 2/812006 FUKUSHIMA, WDITH
AP - 00232945 2/8/2006 FURMAN, ROLAND
AP - 00232946 2/8/2006 GARCIA, VIVIAN
AP - 00232947 2/812006 GIORDANO, MARIANNA
AP - 00232948 2/8/2006 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATI
AP - 00232949 2/812006 GRIDER, JESSICA
AP - 00232950 2/8/2006 HADFIELD, SHALON
AP - 00232951 2/812006 HAKIMI, SUSAN
AP - 00232951 2/812006 HAKIMI, SUSAN
AP - 00232952 2/8/2006 HANGER 18 LLC.
AP - 00232953 2/8/2006 HARALAMBOS BEVERAGE COMPANY
AP - 00232954 2/8/2006 HEILIG, KELLY
AP - 00232955 2/8/2006 HOOD, KARYE
AP - 00232956 2/812006 HOYT, RAYMOND
AP - 00232957 2/8/2006 HSU, STEVE
AP - 00232958 2/8/2006 HULS ENVIRONMENTAL MGT LLC
AP - 00232959 2/812006 HUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN BERNARDINO V ALl
AP - 00232960 2/8/2006 HURLEY, KELLY
AP - 00232961 2/8/2006 HURST, CHERYL
AP - 00232962 2/812006 INLAND EMPIRE MAGAZINE
AP - 00232963 2/812006 INLAND EMPIRE TOURS AND TRANSPORTATlC
AP - 00232963 2/8/2006 INLAND EMPIRE TOURS AND TRANSPORTATIC
AP - 00232964 2/812006 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN
AP - 00232964 2/8/2006 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN
AP - 00232964 2/812006 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN
AP - 00232964 2/8/2006 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN
AP - 00232964 2/8/2006 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN
AP - 00232964 2/812006 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN
AP - 00232964 2/812006 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN
AP - 00232964 2/8/2006 INLAND VALLEY DAIL Y BULLETIN
User: KFINCHER - Karen Fincher Page: 3
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG]ORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
216.00
36,178.23
238.67
1,200.00
2,677.50
392.00
553.00
19.39
1.98
1,452.28
1,642.10
840.00
840.00
630.00
210.00
840.00
840.00
868.00
396.00
694.40
42.43
105.84
211.30
198.00
2,430.00
400.00
32.01
159.00
80.00
59.00
34.00
279.00
583.00
140.00
315.82
1,260.60
45.59
752.40
504.00
2,467.50
586.40
100.00
288.50
1,095.00
1,037.00
982.00
436.80
140.40
340.80
159.60
201.60
142.80
2,280.00
226.80
Current Date: 02/22/;
3 Time: 15:2
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Al!enda Check Rel!ister
2/8/2006 through 2/21/2006
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00232964 2/8/2006 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 693.60
AP - 00232964 2/8/2006 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 6,048.00
AP - 00232964 2/8/2006 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 855.60
AP - 00232964 2/8/2006 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 148.80
AP - 00232964 2/8/2006 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 98.40
AP - 00232964 2/8/2006 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 199.20
AP - 00232964 2/812006 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 199.20
AP - 00232964 2/8/2006 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 193.20
AP - 00232964 2/812006 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 260.40
AP - 00232964 2/8/2006 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 1,088.40
AP - 00232965 2/8/2006 INLAND V ALLEY DANCE ACADEMY 3,540.90
AP - 00232966 2/8/2006 INTERNA nONAL ASSOCIA nON OF CHIEFS OF 100.00
AP - 00232967 2/8/2006 INTOXIMETERS INC 251.50
AP - 00232968 2/8/2006 INTRA V AlA ROCK AND SAND INC 2,886.00
AP - 00232969 2/8/2006 J D C INC 127,605.90
AP - 00232970 2/8/2006 JONES AND MAYER LAW OFFICES OF 1,737.50
AP - 00232970 2/8/2006 JONES AND MAYER LAW OFFICES OF 212.50
AP - 00232970 2/8/2006 JONES AND MAYER LAW OFFICES OF 62.50
AP - 00232971 2/8/2006 JONES, BOB 1,540.00
AP - 00232971 2/8/2006 JONES, BOB 700.00
AP - 00232972 2/8/2006 KALIN, HENRY 100.00
AP - 00232973 2/8/2006 KAPLAN, DENEAN 1,218.60
AP - 00232974 2/812006 KARSCH, DA YNA 264.00
AP - 00232977 2/8/2006 KOPPEL AND GRUBER PUBLIC FINANCE 4,515.00
AP - 00232977 2/8/2006 KOPPEL AND GRUBER PUBLIC FINANCE 3,480.00
AP - 00232977 2/812006 KOPPEL AND GRUBER PUBLIC FINANCE 1,950.00
AP - 00232978 2/8/2006 KOZLOVICH, DEBBIE 3,258.00
AP - 00232980 2/812006 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 175.00
AP - 00232981 2/812006 LIM, HEATHER 1,168.50
AP - 00232982 2/8/2006 LINEAR SYSTEMS 10,315.65
AP - 00232983 2/812006 LIVE OAK DOG OBEDIENCE 256.50
AP - 00232985 2/8/2006 LUNA, CECILA 68.00
AP - 00232986 2/8/2006 MAGRUDER, KAREN 394.80
AP - 00232989 2/812006 MARSHALL, SYLVIA 1,219.80
AP - 00232990 2/8/2006 MARTINEZ, SUSAN 10.00
AP - 00232992 2/8/2006 MEISNER, CHARLES 500.00
AP - 00232993 2/812006 MIDWEST TAPE 356.84
AP - 00232993 2/812006 MIDWEST TAPE 312.86
AP - 00232994 2/8/2006 MILLS, CAREY 816.00
AP - 00232996 2/8/2006 MOE, JOHN 337.50
AP - 00232998 2/812006 NAPA AUTO PARTS -31.38
AP - 00232998 2/8/2006 NAPA AUTO PARTS 11.09
AP - 00232998 2/8/2006 NAPA AUTO PARTS 3.51
AP - 00232998 2/812006 NAPA AUTO PARTS 12.41
AP - 00232998 2/8/2006 NAPA AUTO PARTS 3.51
AP - 00232998 2/812006 NAPA AUTO PARTS 11.84
AP - 00232998 2/8/2006 NAPA AUTO PARTS 70.58
AP - 00232998 2/8/2006 NAPA AUTO PARTS 3.65
AP - 00232998 2/8/2006 NAPA AUTO PARTS 14.86
AP - 00232998 2/8/2006 NAPA AUTO PARTS 271.11
AP - 00232999 2/812006 NATIONAL DEFERRED 27,488.58
AP - 00233000 2/8/2006 NA nONS RENT 213.16
AP - 00233000 2/8/2006 NA nONS RENT 376.46
AP - 00233000 2/8/2006 NA nONS RENT 34.48
~---- - -- -----
User: KFINCHER - Ka,en Fincher Page: 4 Current Date: 02/22/;
Report:CK _AGENDA_REG ]ORTRAIT _ RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout '-I Time: 15:2
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Al!.enda Check Rel!.ister
2/8/2006 through 2/21/2006
Check No.
Check Date Vendor Name
Amount
AP - 00233001 2/8/2006 NEC BUSINESS NETWORK SOLUTIONS INC
AP - 00233002 2/8/2006 NEEMAN, YVETTE
AP - 00233003 2/8/2006 NESTOR TRAFFIC SYSTEMS
AP - 00233004 2/8/2006 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS
AP - 00233004 2/8/2006 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS
AP - 00233004 2/8/2006 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS
AP - 00233005 2/8/2006 NEWS FOR AMERICA LLC
AP - 00233006 2/8/2006 NICHOLS, GARY
AP - 00233007 2/8/2006 NOLO PRESS
AP - 00233008 2/8/2006 OCEAN SYSTEMS
AP - 00233008 2/8/2006 OCEAN SYSTEMS
AP - 00233008 2/8/2006 OCEAN SYSTEMS
AP - 00233008 2/8/2006 OCEAN SYSTEMS
AP - 00233008 2/8/2006 OCEAN SYSTEMS
AP - 00233009 2/8/2006 OFFICE DEPOT
AP - 00233009 2/8/2006 OFFICE DEPOT
AP - 00233009 2/8/2006 OFFICE DEPOT
AP - 00233009 2/8/2006 OFFICE DEPOT
AP - 00233009 2/8/2006 OFFICE DEPOT
AP - 00233009 2/8/2006 OFFICE DEPOT
AP - 00233009 2/8/2006 OFFICE DEPOT
AP - 00233009 2/8/2006 OFFICE DEPOT
AP - 00233009 2/8/2006 OFFICE DEPOT
AP - 00233009 2/8/2006 OFFICE DEPOT
AP - 00233009 2/8/2006 OFFICE DEPOT
AP - 00233009 2/8/2006 OFFICE DEPOT
AP - 00233009 2/8/2006 OFFICE DEPOT
AP - 00233011 2/8/2006 ONTARIO ICE SKATING CENTER
AP - 00233012 2/8/2006 ONTIVEROS, BARBARA
AP - 00233013 2/8/2006 OPEN APPS
AP - 00233014 2/8/2006 OTANEZ, CAROLA
AP - 00233015 2/8/2006 OWEN ELECTRIC INC
AP - 00233015 2/8/2006 OWEN ELECTRIC INC
AP - 00233015 2/8/2006 OWEN ELECTRIC INC
AP - 00233017 2/8/2006 PAL CAMPAIGN
AP - 00233018 2/8/2006 PARKER DIRECTORY
AP - 00233020 2/8/2006 PEP BOYS
AP - 00233021 2/8/2006 PEREZ, DONNA
AP - 00233022 2/8/2006 PHOENIX GROUP INFORMATION SYSTEMS
AP - 00233023 2/8/2006 PHONG, BRYAN
AP - 00233024 2/8/2006 PIMENTEL, SYLVIA
AP - 00233025 2/8/2006 PIONEER MANUFACTURING
AP - 00233026 2/8/2006 PMI
AP - 00233027 2/8/2006 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO
AP - 00233028 2/8/2006 PRATT, TISHA
AP - 00233029 2/8/2006 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC
AP - 00233030 2/8/2006 PRECISION GYMNASTICS
AP - 00233031 2/8/2006 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY
AP - 00233033 2/8/2006 QUINTANA, ZITA
AP - 00233034 2/8/2006 RAND R LIGHTING
AP - 00233035 2/8/2006 R.C. CLUB CHEER
AP - 00233036 2/8/2006 RAMOS, GRETTA
AP - 00233037 2/8/2006 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI
AP - 00233037 2/8/2006 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COM ME I
--------
User: KFINCHER - Karen Finche, Page: 5
Report:CK _AGENDA_REG _PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
16,194.19
95.00
33,840.00
53.78
46.28
46.28
99.00
472.50
63.21
21,576.80
4,326.20
200.00
9,338.00
3,978.00
67.26
328.51
83.48
11.02
34.89
31.12
13.55
34.87
351.35
37.77
43.97
237.51
11.62
1,244.25
80.00
270.00
42.00
6,287.00
1,475.09
1,306.96
189.87
80.D9
2.12
85.00
445.85
80.00
34.00
712.50
806.40
2,028.33
50.00
364.50
1,871.80
7.00
193.00
164.74
1,363.20
315.00
25.00
20.00
Current Date: 02/22/;
5 Time: 15:2
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Al!enda Check Rel!ister
2/8/2006 through 2/21/2006
Check No.
Check Date Vendor Name
Amount
AP - 00233037 2/8/2006 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI
AP - 00233037 2/8/2006 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI
AP - 00233037 2/8/2006 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI
AP - 00233037 2/8/2006 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI
AP - 00233037 2/8/2006 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI
AP - 00233038 2/8/2006 RAPP, SCOIT
AP - 00233040 2/8/2006 REINHARDTSEN, DEBRA
AP - 00233041 2/8/2006 RICO, ERIC
AP - 00233042 2/8/2006 RIGGING SEMINARS
AP - 00233043 2/8/2006 RIVERSIDE CO DEPT CHILD SUPPORT
AP - 00233044 2/8/2006 ROCKFlELD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
AP - 00233044 2/8/2006 ROCKFIELD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
AP - 00233045 2/8/2006 SAFE KIDS WORLDWIDE
AP - 00233046 2/8/2006 SAN BERNARDINO CO SHERIFFS DEPT
AP - 00233046 2/8/2006 SAN BERNARDINO CO SHERIFFS DEPT
AP - 00233047 2/8/2006 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT
AP - 00233048 2/8/2006 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
AP - 00233049 2/8/2006 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
AP - 00233050 2/8/2006 SAN BERNARDINO CTY CHILD SUPPORT PA YM
AP - 00233051 2/8/2006 SAN BERNARDINO CTY CHILD SUPPORT PA YM
AP - 00233052 2/8/2006 SAN BERNARDINO CTY CHILD SUPPORT PA YM
AP - 00233053 2/8/2006 SAN BERNARDINO, CITY OF
AP - 00233054 2/8/2006 SAVANT CONSTRUCTION INC
AP - 00233055 2/8/2006 SBC
AP - 00233056 2/8/2006 SCOTT, DIANA
AP - 00233057 2/8/2006 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES
AP - 00233058 2/8/2006 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES
AP - 00233059 2/8/2006 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY
AP - 00233059 2/8/2006 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY
AP - 00233059 2/8/2006 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY
AP - 00233060 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/812006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/812006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/812006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/812006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/812006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/812006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
---~----
User: KFINCHER - Karen Fincher Page: 6
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
83.91
282.50
349.80
1,000.00
250.00
1,000.00
1,000.00
60.00
502.02
593.12
204.00
1,000.00
182.08
408.00
213.50
322.50
600.00
500.00
55.32
500.00
368.79
481.81
672.85
639.94
1,770.88
1,394.01
1,773.11
14.50
15.51
15.55
15.04
15.04
15.65
50.09
52.66
965.56
14.94
14.10
14.10
15.41
78.59
79.25
15.04
104.39
15.04
27.58
11,716.54
95.88
56.33
Current Date: 02/22/;
& Time: 15:2
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Ae:enda Check Ree:ister
2/8/2006 through 2/21/2006
Check No.
Check Date Vendor Name
Amount
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
------ ---
User: KFINCHER - Karen Finche, Page: 7
Report:CK _AGENDA_REG ]ORTRAIT _ RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
90.50
25.64
15.65
252.56
57.13
15.41
15.04
15.04
14.10
14.10
427.14
15.04
15.04
43.05
24.01
58.65
173.08
16.36
161.90
132.50
93.11
115.80
30.29
124.66
14.55
17.62
4,259.29
19.92
15.04
50.21
13.63
139.72
21.62
21.62
23.04
39.21
15.20
14.84
15.04
14.10
14.10
137.36
14.10
128.07
15.53
15.04
64.78
162.88
126.40
15.65
44.59
282.31
19.36
104.99
Current Date: 02/22/;
7 Time: 15:2
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
2/8/2006 through 2/21/2006
Check No.
Check Date Vendor Name
Amount
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/812006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233064 2/8/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
User: KFINCHER - Karen Finche, Page: 8
Report:CK _AGENDA_REG _PORTRAIT _RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
119.64
27.05
50.08
3,001.50
21.94
176.85
10,215.32
101.26
113.34
13.63
82. II
55.50
14.57
14.10
14.10
15.41
57.84
15.15
15.04
14.57
15.55
15.34
141.86
107.21
15.04
15.25
13.63
105.23
14.10
II 1.16
82.40
15.04
14.10
61.03
98.79
13.74
14.21
15.34
15.04
117.06
15.04
15.51
27.50
89.34
14.84
98.86
64.59
46.47
37.47
13.63
14.70
75.15
97.02
42.46
Current Date: 02/22/:
8' Time: 15:2
Check No.
AP - 00233064
AP - 00233064
AP - 00233064
AP - 00233064
AP - 00233064
AP - 00233064
AP - 00233064
AP - 00233064
AP - 00233064
AP - 00233064
AP - 00233065
AP - 00233066
AP - 00233067
AP - 00233068
AP - 00233069
AP - 00233070
AP - 00233071
AP - 00233072
AP - 00233072
AP - 00233072
AP - 00233073
AP - 00233074
AP - 00233075
AP - 00233076
AP - 00233077
AP - 00233078
AP - 00233079
AP - 00233080
AP - 00233081
AP - 00233082
AP - 00233083
AP - 00233085
AP - 00233085
AP - 00233085
AP - 00233085
AP - 00233085
AP - 00233085
AP - 00233085
AP - 00233085
AP - 00233085
AP - 00233085
AP - 00233085
AP - 00233085
AP - 00233085
AP - 00233085
AP - 00233085
AP - 00233085
AP - 00233085
AP - 00233085
AP - 00233085
AP - 00233085
AP - 00233085
AP - 00233085
AP - 00233085
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Al!enda Check Rel!ister
2/8/2006 through 2/21/2006
Check Date Vendor Name
2/8/2006
2/8/2006
2/8/2006
2/8/2006
2/8/2006
2/8/2006
2/8/2006
2/8/2006
2/8/2006
2/8/2006
2/8/2006
2/8/2006
2/8/2006
2/8/2006
2/8/2006
2/8/2006
2/8/2006
2/8/2006
2/8/2006
2/8/2006
2/8/2006
2/8/2006
2/8/2006
2/8/2006
2/8/2006
2/8/2006
2/8/2006
2/8/2006
2/8/2006
2/8/2006
2/8/2006
2/8/2006
2/8/2006
2/8/2006
2/8/2006
2/8/2006
2/8/2006
2/8/2006
2/8/2006
2/8/2006
2/8/2006
2/8/2006
2/8/2006
2/8/2006
2/8/2006
2/8/2006
2/8/2006
2/8/2006
2/8/2006
2/8/2006
2/8/2006
2/8/2006
2/8/2006
2/8/2006
Amount
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL ATHLEn
SOUTHLAND SPORTS OFFICIALS
STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
STANDARD PACIFIC OF INLAND EMPIRE
STOFA, JOSEPH
SWEDA, SHANNON
TERRY, DONNA
THOMSON GALE
THOMSON GALE
THOMSON GALE
TUTORWHIZ INC
UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION
UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR p,
UNIQUE CREATIONS
UNITED WAY
UPLAND MUSIC SCHOOL
UPLAND TENNIS CLUB
UPS
US HOMES INLAND DIVISION
US POSTMASTER
VARNEY, SUSAN
VERIZON
VERIZON
VERIZON
VERIZON
VERIZON
VERIZON
VERIZON
VERIZON
VERIZON
VERIZON
VERIZON
VER1Z0N
VERIZON
VERIZON
VERIZON
VERIZON
VERIZON
VERIZON
VERIZON
VERIZON
VERIZON
VERIZON
VERIZON
14.60
112.97
12.58
15.51
6,694.75
15.91
15.04
15.04
21,157.90
421.50
1,812.00
788.50
367.46
1,000.00
14.00
216.00
327.60
26.64
175.12
54.08
788.90
2,714.00
1,521.74
62.05
472.82
2,035.00
1,771.20
37.02
2,500.00
7,800.00
1,000.00
469.79
29.40
90.06
90.06
90.31
29.36
318.29
29.36
9006
90.06
90.06
577.46
29.47
315.53
28.40
387.55
59.87
299.53
90.06
90.06
90.06
28.40
29.36
Current Date: 02/22/:
q Time: i5:2
User: KFINCHER - Karen Fincher Page: 9
Report:CK _AGENDA _ REG]ORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
Check No.
AP - 00233085
AP - 00233085
AP - 00233085
AP - 00233085
AP - 00233085
AP - 00233085
AP - 00233085
AP - 00233085
AP - 00233085
AP - 00233085
AP - 00233085
AP - 00233085
AP - 00233085
AP - 00233085
AP - 00233085
AP - 00233085
AP - 00233085
AP - 00233085
AP - 00233085
AP - 00233085
AP - 00233085
AP - 00233085
AP - 00233085
AP - 00233085
AP - 00233085
AP - 00233085
AP - 00233085
AP - 00233085
AP - 00233085
AP - 00233086
AP - 00233086
AP - 00233087
AP - 00233088
AP - 00233089
AP - 00233090
AP - 00233090
AP - 00233090
AP - 00233091
AP - 00233091
AP - 00233092
AP - 00233093
AP - 00233094
AP - 00233095
AP - 00233096
AP - 00233097
AP - 00233098
AP - 00233099
AP - 00233101
AP - 00233102
AP - 00233103
AP - 00233104
AP - 00233104
AP - 00233104
AP - 00233104
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Al!enda Check Rel!ister
2/8/2006 through 2/21/2006
Check Date Vendor Name
2/812006
2/812006
2/812006
2/8/2006
2/812006
2/812006
2/8/2006
2/812006
2/8/2006
2/8/2006
2/8/2006
2/8/2006
2/8/2006
2/812006
2/812006
2/812006
2/812006
2/812006
2/812006
2/8/2006
2/8/2006
2/812006
2/812006
2/8/2006
2/812006
2/8/2006
2/8/2006
2/812006
2/812006
2/812006
2/8/2006
2/812006
2/812006
2/8/2006
2/812006
2/8/2006
2/812006
2/812006
2/812006
2/8/2006
2/812006
2/8/2006
2/8/2006
2/8/2006
2/8/2006
2/8/2006
2/8/2006
2/812006
2/1512006
2/1512006
2/1512006
2/1512006
2/1512006
2/1512006
VERIZON
VERIZON
VERIZON
VERIZON
VERIZON
VERIZON
VERIZON
VERIZON
VERIZON
VERIZON
VERIZON
VERIZON
VERIZON
VERIZON
VERIZON
VERIZON
VERIZON
VERIZON
VERIZON
VERIZON
VERIZON
VERIZON
VERIZON
VERIZON
VERIZON
VERIZON
VERIZON
VERIZON
VERIZON
VERIZON
VERIZON
VERIZON
VERIZON
VICARIO, ELIZABETH
VICTORIA ARBORS LLC
VICTORIA ARBORS LLC
VICTORIA ARBORS LLC
VIDEO GUYS, THE
VIDEO GUYS, THE
VILLAGOMEZ, CHARLEI
VISION SERVICE PLAN CA
VOLM,LIZA
WARD, DESIREE
WESTERN GRAPHICS PLUS
WORD MILL PUBLISHING
XEROX CORPORATION
ZAILO, ROBERT
CACEO
A AND A AUTOMOTIVE
A AND R TIRE SERVICE
ABC LOCKSMITHS
ABC LOCKSMITHS
ABC LOCKSMITHS
ABC LOCKSMITHS
User: KFINCHER - Karen Fincher Page: 10
Report: CK _AGENDA_REG ~PORTRAIT _ RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
Amount
28.40
110.58
90.06
90.06
90.06
29.36
29.36
148.51
44.50
58.78
154.97
27.43
27.91
27.43
85.24
90.31
90.31
62.37
29.36
27.97
19.16
29.36
29.36
178.07
469.79
29.36
90.31
1,259.32
58.78
547.15
123.58
1,155.15
1,173.52
3.00
1,000.00
1,000.00
100,000.00
53.88
53.88
94.87
8,436.96
112.50
452.50
826.14
375.00
176.33
288.00
65.00
53.10
6,398.82
627.75
368.77
168.67
27.98
Current Date: 02/22/;
I 0 Time: 15:2
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Al!enda Check Rel!ister
2/8/2006 through 2/21/2006
Check No.
Check Date Vendor Name
Amount
AP - 00233104 2/1512006 ABC LOCKSMITHS
AP - 00233104 2/1512006 ABC LOCKSMITHS
AP - 00233104 2/1512006 ABC LOCKSMITHS
AP - 00233105 2/15/2006 ABLAC
AP - 00233106 2/15/2006 ACH MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS INC
AP - 00233106 2/15/2006 ACH MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS INC
AP - 00233106 2/1512006 ACH MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS INC
AP - 00233106 2/1512006 ACH MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS INC
AP - 00233106 2/15/2006 ACH MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS INC
AP - 00233106 2/1512006 ACH MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS INC
AP - 00233107 2/15/2006 ACREY FENCE COMPANY
AP - 00233108 2/1512006 ADAMSON, RONALD
AP - 00233108 2/15/2006 ADAMSON, RONALD
AP - 00233109 2/1512006 AEF SYSTEMS CONSULTING INC
AP-00233111 2/1512006 ALCORNFENCECOMPANY
AP - 00233113 2/15/2006 ALL DATA
AP - 00233115 2/15/2006 AMAZON. COM CREDIT
AP - 00233117 2/15/2006 AMERICAN ROTARY BROOM CO. INe.
AP - 00233117 2/15/2006 AMERICAN ROTARY BROOM CO. INe.
AP - 00233117 2/15/2006 AMERICAN ROTARY BROOM CO. INe.
AP - 00233117 2/15/2006 AMERICAN ROTARY BROOM CO. INe.
AP - 00233117 2/15/2006 AMERICAN ROTARY BROOM CO. INe.
AP - 00233118 2/1512006 AMERICAN TRAINING RESOURCES INC
AP - 00233119 2/15/2006 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES
AP - 00233119 2/15/2006 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES
AP - 00233120 2/1512006 ANAHEIM, CITY OF
AP - 00233121 2/15/2006 ANDRADE, LAINI
AP - 00233122 2/15/2006 APPLIED METERING TECHNOLOGIES INC
AP - 00233123 2/1512006 ARAMARK
AP - 00233124 2/15/2006 ARCH WIRELESS
AP - 00233125 2/1512006 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP
AP - 00233125 2/15/2006 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP
AP - 00233125 2/1512006 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP
AP - 00233125 2/1512006 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP
AP - 00233126 2/15/2006 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION
AP - 00233126 2/1512006 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION
AP - 00233126 2/15/2006 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION
AP - 00233126 2/1512006 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION
AP - 00233126 2/15/2006 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION
AP - 00233126 2/1512006 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION
AP - 00233126 2/15/2006 ARROWHEAD CREDITUNTON
AP - 00233127 2/15/2006 ARROWHEAD POND OF ANAHEIM
AP - 00233128 2/15/2006 ASSI SECURITY
AP - 00233128 2/15/2006 ASSI SECURITY
AP - 00233129 2/15/2006 ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS INC
AP - 00233130 2/15/2006 ASSOCIATED GROUP
AP - 00233131 2/1512006 AUFBAU CORPORATION
AP - 00233132 2/15/2006 AUTO BODY 2000
AP - 00233133 2/15/2006 AVANTS, MARGE
AP - 00233134 2/15/2006 BAND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE
AP - 00233134 2/1512006 BAND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE
AP - 00233134 2/15/2006 BAND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE
AP - 00233134 2/15/2006 BAND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE
AP - 00233134 2/15/2006 BAND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE
User: KFINCHER - Ka,en Fincher Page: 11
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
482.55
268.09
35.56
16.39
7,099.96
23,496.31
-710.00
-109.23
-2,349.63
1,092.30
72.00
660.00
462.00
3,675.00
4,034.09
1,616.25
351.34
311.60
161.54
397.54
545.31
419.10
484.44
195.97
146.31
227,555.04
12.61
30,739.96
44.83
710.45
300.00
900.00
4,050.00
576.00
142.38
835.62
66.81
480.00
584.08
350.00
350.00
2,481.00
233.00
105.00
18,348.00
1,986.59
11,008.00
461.00
60.00
125.15
271.53
150.85
7.31
45.26
Current Date: 02/22/;
/ I Time: 15:2
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Al!enda Check Rel!ister
2/8/2006 through 2/21/2006
Check No.
Check Date Vendor Name
Amount
AP - 00233134 2/15/2006 BAND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE
AP - 00233134 2/15/2006 BAND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE
AP - 00233134 2/15/2006 BAND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE
AP - 00233135 2/15/2006 BAGGlT!NC.
AP - 00233136 2/15/2006 BAKER, COLLEEN
AP - 00233137 2/15/2006 BALDY FIRE AND SAFETY
AP - 00233138 2/15/2006 BASAT, SHAPIRO-BEN
AP - 00233138 2/15/2006 BASAT, SHAPIRO-BEN
AP - 00233138 2/15/2006 BASAT, SHAPIRO-BEN
AP - 00233138 2/15/2006 BASAT, SHAPIRO-BEN
AP - 00233139 2/15/2006 BD SYSTEMS
AP - 00233141 2/15/2006 BERGELECTRIC CORPORATION
AP - 00233141 2/15/2006 BERG ELECTRIC CORPORATION
AP - 00233141 2/15/2006 BERGELECTRIC CORPORATION
AP - 00233141 2/15/2006 BERG ELECTRIC CORPORATION
AP - 00233141 2/15/2006 BERGELECTRIC CORPORATION
AP - 00233141 2/15/2006 BERGELECTRIC CORPORATION
AP - 00233142 2/15/2006 BIELBY, JACOBA
AP - 00233143 2/15/2006 BISHOP COMPANY
AP - 00233144 2/15/2006 BLUE MEDICAL BEAUTY SPA
AP - 00233145 2/15/2006 BRODART BOOKS
AP - 00233145 2/15/2006 BRODART BOOKS
AP - 00233145 2/15/2006 BRODART BOOKS
AP - 00233145 2/15/2006 BRODART BOOKS
AP - 00233145 2/15/2006. BRODART BOOKS
AP - 00233145 2/15/2006 BRODART BOOKS
AP - 00233145 2/15/2006 BRODART BOOKS
AP - 00233145 2/15/2006 . BRODART BOOKS
AP - 00233145 2/15/2006 BRODART BOOKS
AP - 00233145 2/15/2006 BRODART BOOKS
AP - 00233145 2/15/2006 BRODART BOOKS
AP - 00233145 2/15/2006 BRODART BOOKS
AP - 00233145 2/15/2006 BRODART BOOKS
AP - 00233145 2/15/2006 BRODART BOOKS
AP - 00233145 2/15/2006 BRODART BOOKS
AP - 00233145 2/15/2006 BRODART BOOKS
AP - 00233145 2/15/2006 BRODART BOOKS
AP - 00233145 2/15/2006 BRODART BOOKS
AP - 00233145 2/15/2006 BRODART BOOKS
AP - 00233145 2/15/2006 BRODART BOOKS
AP - 00233145 2/15/2006 BRODART BOOKS
AP - 00233145 2/15/2006 BRODART BOOKS
AP - 00233145 2/15/2006 BRODART BOOKS
AP - 00233145 2/15/2006 BRODART BOOKS
AP - 00233145 2/15/2006 BRODART BOOKS
AP - 00233145 2/15/2006 BRODART BOOKS
AP - 00233145 2/15/2006 BRODART BOOKS
AP - 00233145 2/15/2006 BRODART BOOKS
AP - 00233145 2/15/2006 BRODART BOOKS
AP - 00233145 2/15/2006 BRODART BOOKS
AP - 00233145 2/15/2006 BRODART BOOKS
AP - 00233145 2/15/2006 BRODART BOOKS
AP - 00233145 2/15/2006 BRODART BOOKS
AP - 00233146 2/15/2006 BRYANT, SHERINE-COLEMAN
------ -.---
User: KFINCHER - Ka,en Fincher Page: 12
Report:CK _AGENDA_REG _PORTRAIT _ RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
47.41
36.10
133.51
243.93
100.00
261.00
49,950.08
18,349.58
-1,834.96
-4,995.01
7,420.00
18,215.34
175,000.49
293.50
-1,821.53
-17,500.05
-29.35
55.00
941.76
260.00
9.37
89.06
258.31
25.78
42.07
11.82
14.07
4.68
14.07
4.68
15.86
128.33
9.37
20.53
6.84
4.68
6.84
4.68
9.37
43.64
26.88
382.23
53.77
55.32
9.50
13.41
10.63
30.65
52.69
22.35
20.09
21.35
274.06
126.00
Current Date: 02/22/;
12 Time: 15:2
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Al!enda Check Rel!ister
2/8/2006 through 2/21/2006
Check No.
Check Date Vendor Name
AP - 00233147 2/15/2006 BURR CYCLES INC, JOHN
AP - 00233148 2/15/2006 BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC
AP - 00233150 2/15/2006 CAL PERS LONG TERM CARE
AP - 00233154 2/15/2006 CALIFORNIA FUND CONTROLINC
AP - 00233155 2/15/2006 CALIFORNIA NATIONAL BANK
AP - 00233156 2/15/2006 CALSENSE
AP - 00233156 2/15/2006 CALSENSE
AP - 00233156 2/15/2006 CALSENSE
AP - 00233157 2/15/2006 CENTRAL CITIES SIGNS INC
AP - 00233158 2/15/2006 CENTRAL MICROFILM
AP - 00233159 2/15/2006 CERTIFIED AUTOMOTIVE GROUP
AP - 00233160 2/15/2006 CHANNEL M.D. INC, PATRICIA GUEVARA
AP - 00233161 2/15/2006 CLABBY, SANDRA
AP - 00233162 2/15/2006 CLEAN STREET INe.
AP - 00233162 2/15/2006 CLEAN STREETINe.
AP - 00233163 2/15/2006 CLS LANDSCAPE MANAGEMENT
AP - 00233164 2/15/2006 CMRTA
AP - 00233165 2/15/2006 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY
AP - 00233167 2/15/2006 CONENGR CORP
AP - 00233168 2/15/2006 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS I
AP - 00233169 2/15/2006 COOPER, CHERYL
AP - 00233170 2/15/2006 COSCO FIRE PROTECTION
AP - 00233170 2/15/2006 COSCO FIRE PROTECTION
AP - 00233170 2/15/2006 COSCO FIRE PROTECTION
AP - 00233170 2/15/2006 COSCO FIRE PROTECTION
AP - 00233172 2/15/2006 CROWNER SHEET METAL
AP - 00233172 2/15/2006 CROWNER SHEET METAL
AP - 00233172 2/15/2006 CROWNER SHEET METAL
AP - 00233172 2/15/2006 CROWNER SHEET METAL
AP - 00233174 2/15/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
AP - 00233174 2/15/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
AP - 00233174 2/15/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
AP - 00233174 2/15/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
AP - 00233174 2/15/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
AP - 00233174 2/15/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
AP - 00233174 2/15/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
AP - 00233174 2/15/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
AP - 00233174 2/15/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
AP - 00233174 2/15/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
AP - 00233174 2/15/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
AP - 00233174 2/15/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
AP - 00233174 2/15/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
AP-00233174 2/15/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
AP - 00233174 2/15/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
AP - 00233174 2/15/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
AP-00233174 2/15/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
AP-00233174 2/15/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
AP-00233174 2/15/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
AP - 00233174 2/15/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
AP-00233174 2/15/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
AP - 00233174 2/15/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
AP - 00233174 2/15/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
AP - 00233174 2/15/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
AP-00233174 2/15/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
--- ---- - -----
User: KFINCHER - Karen Fincher Page: 13
Report:CK _ AGENDA_ REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
Amount
279.52
7,568.24
231.92
10,000.00
242.59
2,469.33
305.67
273.17
116.37
30.26
956.31
47.69
1,000.00
1,200.00
800.00
14,530.00
50.00
34.22
20.00
705.85
513 .30
5,460.00
840.00
-546.00
-84.00
31,730.57
4,881.62
-3,173.06
-488.16
310.97
42.08
52.88
204.08
69.88
437.50
55.20
216.08
32.18
49.28
73.60
127.88
319.88
142.28
73.88
132.08
151.88
76.28
212.48
133.88
273.68
138.08
86.48
68.48
33.38
Current Date: 02/22/;
/3 Time: 15:2
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Al!enda Check Rel!ister
2/8/2006 through 2/21/2006
Check No.
Check Date Vendor Name
AP - 00233174 2/15/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
AP - 00233174 2/15/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
AP - 00233174 2/15/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
AP - 00233174 2/15/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
AP - 00233174 2/15/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
AP - 00233174 2/15/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
AP - 00233174 2/15/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
AP - 00233174 2/15/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
AP - 00233174 2/15/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
AP - 00233174 2/15/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
AP - 00233174 2/15/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
AP - 00233174 2/15/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
AP - 00233174 2/15/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
AP - 00233174 2/15/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
AP - 00233174 2/15/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
AP - 00233174 2/15/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
AP - 00233 I 74 2/15/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
AP - 00233174 2/15/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
AP - 00233174 2/15/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
AP - 00233174 2/15/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
AP - 00233174 2/15/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
AP - 00233174 2/15/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
AP - 00233174 2/15/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
AP - 00233174 2/15/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
AP-00233174 2/15/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
AP-00233174 2/15/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
AP - 00233174 2/15/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
AP - 00233174 2/15/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
AP-00233174 2/15/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
AP - 00233174 2/15/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
AP-00233174 2/15/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
AP - 00233175 2/15/2006 CYBERCOM RESOURCES INC
AP - 00233175 2/15/2006 CYBERCOM RESOURCES INC
AP - 00233175 2/15/2006 CYBERCOM RESOURCES INC
AP - 00233175 2/15/2006 CYBERCOM RESOURCES INC
AP - 00233175 2/15/2006 CYBERCOM RESOURCES INC
AP - 00233177 2/15/2006 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY
AP - 00233177 2/15/2006 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY
AP - 00233180 2/15/2006 DAPPER TIRE CO
AP - 00233180 2/15/2006 DAPPER TIRE CO
AP - 00233181 2/15/2006 DEER CREEK CAR CARE CENTER
AP - 00233182 2/15/2006 DELTA MICROIMAGING INC
AP - 00233182 2/15/2006 DELTA MICROIMAGING INC
AP - 00233183 2/15/2006 DENBOW, STELLA
AP - 00233184 2/15/2006 DHARMACHAKRA BUDDHIST CENTER
AP - 00233185 2/15/2006 DIETERICH POST COMPANY
AP - 00233186 2/15/2006 DOORKEYPER INC.
AP - 00233187 2/15/2006 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORA nON
AP - 00233188 2/15/2006 DYLAN, DAVE
AP - 00233189 2/15/2006 EAGLE AERIAL IMAGING
AP - 00233190 2/15/2006 EASTERLING, RAY
AP - 00233191 2/15/2006 ELLISON-SCHNEIDER & HARRIS L.L.P.
AP - 00233192 2/15/2006 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS
AP - 00233192 2/15/2006 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS
------ --- -------
User: KFINCHER - Karen Fincher Page: 14
Report: CK _AGENDA_REG ]ORTRAIT _ RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
Amount
67.48
556.04
66.68
246.68
130.88
234.08
116.48
105.68
446.48
86.48
62.48
720.08
229.15
114.22
300.08
135.68
240.08
960.08
416.23
87.08
83.48
66.28
375.68
340.88
88.28
34.88
171.68
1,661.71
266.48
188.48
1,147.03
1,750.00
350.00
2,275.00
350.00
350.00
940.66
614.18
208.57
871.28
164.50
475.18
1,870.37
25.00
250.00
250.63
416.92
110.95
78.00
7,392.52
150.00
5,151.00
362.04
543.06
----~---
Current Date: 02/22/;
/ '-/ Time: 15:2
Check No.
AP - 00233193
AP - 00233194
AP - 00233195
AP - 00233196
AP - 00233197
AP - 00233197
AP - 00233197
AP - 00233198
AP - 00233198
AP - 00233198
AP - 00233199
AP - 00233200
AP - 00233200
AP - 00233200
AP - 00233200
AP - 00233202
AP - 00233203
AP - 00233204
AP - 00233205
AP - 00233206
AP - 00233206
AP - 00233206
AP - 00233206
AP - 00233206
AP - 00233206
AP - 00233206
AP - 00233206
AP - 00233206
AP - 00233206
AP - 00233206
AP - 00233206
AP - 00233206
AP - 00233208
AP - 00233208
AP - 00233208
AP - 00233209
AP - 00233209
AP - 00233209
AP - 00233211
AP - 00233211
AP - 00233211
AP - 00233212
AP - 00233213
AP - 00233214
AP - 00233215
AP - 00233216
AP - 00233217
AP - 00233218
AP - 00233219
AP - 00233220
AP - 00233220
. AP - 00233220
AP - 00233220
AP - 00233220
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Al!:enda Check Rel!:ister
2/812006 through 2/2112006
Check Date Vendor Name
Amount
2/15/2006 EMPIRE MOBILE HOME SERVICE
2/1512006 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT.
2/1512006 ENTOURAGE TALENT !\$SOCIATES
2/15/2006 ESCOBEDO, THEREZA
2/1512006 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS
2/15/2006 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS
2/1512006 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS
2/15/2006 EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY
2/1512006 EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY
2/1512006 EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY
2/15/2006 FASTENAL COMPANY
2/15/2006 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP
2/15/2006 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP
2/1512006 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP
2/15/2006 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP
2/1512006 FENCE CRAFT OF UPLAND INC
2/1512006 FIELDMAN ROLAPP AND ASSOCIATES
2/1512006 FIELDS, CAMILLE
2/15/2006 FILARSKY AND WATT
2/1512006 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES
2/1512006 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES
2/1512006 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES
2/1512006 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES
2/1512006 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES
2/1512006 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES
2/15/2006 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES
2/1512006 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES
2/1512006 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES
2/1512006 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES
2/1512006 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES
2/15/2006 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES
2/15/2006 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES
2/1512006 FIRST CENTENNIAL BANK
2/15/2006 FIRST CENTENNIAL BANK
2/15/2006 FIRST CENTENNIAL BANK
2/1512006 FISHER SCIENTIFIC
2/15/2006 FISHER SCIENTIFIC
2/1512006 FISHER SCIENTIFIC
2/1512006 FORD OF UPLAND INC
2/15/2006 FORD OF UPLAND INC
2/15/2006 FORD OF UPLAND INC
2/15/2006 FOREMOST PROMOTIONS
2/15/2006 FORMAN, RICHTER & RUBIN-AN ACCOUNTING
2/15/2006 FRONT BRIDGE TECHNOLOGIES
2/15/2006 GARCIA, VIVIAN
2/15/2006 GENESIS REAL ESTATE GROUP 1
2/1512006 GEOGRAPHICS
2/1512006 GIRON, SABION
2/15/2006 GOINS, BOYD
2/15/2006 GRAINGER
2/15/2006 GRAINGER
2/15/2006 GRAINGER
2/15/2006 GRAINGER
2/15/2006 GRAINGER
850.00
10,634.00
2,200.00
500.00
198.63
91.40
364.21
139.82
25.27
25.27
20.08
15.97
12.05
12.05
13.99
5,892.33
2,024.38
36.00
172.50
535.92
727.32
703.40
545.49
540.71
703.40
630.00
651.00
520.80
1,076.40
885.30
1,180.40
1,111.50
710.00
109.23
2,349.63
86.74
149.09
-162.68
65.00
43.88
133.95
297.15
231.96
850.00
35.89
114.24
4,037.55
10.00
250.00
61.68
71.04
156.37
75.43
32.60
Current Date: 02/22/;
I 5 Time: 15:2
User: KFINCHER - Karen Fincher Page: 15
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG]ORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Al!enda Check Rel!ister
2/8/2006 through 2/21/2006
Check No.
Check Date Vendor Name
Amount
AP - 00233221 2/1512006 GRANT, MELVA
AP - 00233222 2/1512006 GRA VOS, PATRICIA
AP - 00233224 2/15/2006 H & H GENERAL CONTRACTORS INC
AP - 00233225 2/15/2006 H & H GENERAL CONTRACTORS INC
AP - 00233225 2/1512006 H & H GENERAL CONTRACTORS INC
AP - 00233226 2/15/2006 HANSON, BARRYE
AP - 00233227 2/15/2006 HANSON, BARRYE
AP - 00233228 2/1512006 HAVEN FOOD STORE
AP - 00233229 2/1512006 HCS CUTLER STEEL CO
AP - 00233230 2/1512006 HENCZ, TRACY
AP - 00233231 2/1512006 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC
AP - 00233231 2/1 512006 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC
AP - 00233231 2/1 512006 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC
AP - 00233231 2/1 5/2006 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC
AP - 00233231 2/1512006 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC
AP - 00233231 2/1512006 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC
AP - 00233231 2/1512006 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC
AP - 00233231 2/1512006 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC
AP - 00233231 2/1 5/2006 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC
AP - 00233234 2/15/2006 HOUSTON & HARRIS PCS INC
AP - 00233235 2/15/2006 HOYT LUMBER CO., SM
AP - 00233235 2/1512006 HOYT LUMBER CO., SM
AP - 00233236 2/15/2006 HUANG, PRUDENCE
AP - 00233237 2/15/2006 HUNTINGTON GLAZING
AP - 00233237 2/15/2006 HUNTINGTON GLAZING
AP - 00233237 2/1512006 HUNTINGTON GLAZING
AP - 00233237 2/15/2006 HUNTINGTON GLAZING
AP - 00233237 2/15/2006 HUNTINGTON GLAZING
AP - 00233237 2/1512006 HUNTINGTON GLAZING
AP - 00233237 2/15/2006 HUNTINGTON GLAZING
AP - 00233237 2/1512006 HUNTINGTON GLAZING
AP - 00233238 2/1 512006 HUYNH, TRANG
AP - 00233239 2/15/2006 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC
AP - 00233239 2/1512006 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC
AP - 00233239 2/1512006 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC
AP - 00233239 2/1512006 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC
AP - 00233242 2/1512006 INLAND MEDIATION BOARD
AP - 00233243 2/1 5/2006 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN
AP - 00233244 2/1 512006 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN
AP - 00233244 2/1 5/2006 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN
AP - 00233245 2/1512006 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN
AP - 00233246 2/1512006 INLINE PLUMBING CONTRACTORS
AP - 00233247 2/1512006 INNOCENZI, ROBERT A
AP - 00233248 2/1512006 INSIGHT DIRECT
AP - 00233249 2/1512006 ISEC INCORPORATED
AP - 00233249 2/1 512006 ISEC INCORPORATED
AP - 00233249 2/1 512006 ISEC INCORPORATED
AP - 00233249 2/1 512006 ISEC INCORPORATED
AP - 00233249 2/1512006 ISEC INCORPORATED
AP - 00233249 2/15/2006 ISEC INCORPORATED
AP - 00233250 2/15/2006 JAMAR ELECTRIC TEMECULA
AP - 00233251 2/1512006 KC PRINTING & GRAPHICS INC
AP - 00233251 2/1512006 KC PRINTING & GRAPHICS INC
AP - 00233251 2/1512006 KC PRINTING & GRAPHICS INC
-----. -~-.
User: KFINCHER - Karen Fincher Page: 16
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG]ORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
250.00
250.00
109,771.50
1,219.51
-121.95
1,920.00
25.00
5.11
171.23
55.00
266.42
82.97
389.09
50.00
196.59
123.85
1,095.33
243.62
100.00
4,000.00
22.64
244.38
2,175.00
24,025.79
8,925.10
2,321.66
3,157.59
-2,40258
-892.51
-232.17
-315.76
525.00
16.90
9.18
705.50
7.19
17.50
184.80
388.80
243.00
1,307.75
1,000.00
525.00
21,821.47
39,792.67
-3,979.27
-604.64
-1,763.03
6,046.47
17,630.31
119.00
989.82
152.45
1,967.19
Current Date: 02/22/;
I t, Time: 15:2
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Al!enda Check Rel!ister
2/8/2006 through 2/21/2006
Check No.
Check Date Vendor Name
Amount
AP - 00233252 2/15/2006 KELLY EQUIPMENT
AP - 00233253 2/15/2006 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC
AP - 00233253 2/15/2006 KlMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC
AP - 00233253 2/15/2006 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC
AP - 00233253 2/15/2006 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC
AP - 00233253 2/15/2006 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC
AP - 00233253 2/15/2006 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC
AP - 00233253 2/15/2006 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC
AP - 00233253 2/15/2006 KlMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC
AP - 00233253 2/15/2006 KlMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES 1NC
AP - 00233253 2/15/2006 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC
AP - 00233253 2/15/2006 KlMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC
AP - 00233253 2/15/2006 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC
AP - 00233256 2/15/2006 KURYL CORPORATION
AP - 00233257 2/15/2006 LASER TECHNOLOGY INC
AP - 00233258 2/15/2006 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC
AP - 00233258 2/15/2006 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC
AP - 00233259 2/15/2006 LEGAL DEFENSE FUND
AP - 00233260 2/15/2006 LETNER ROOFING CO INC
AP - 00233260 2/15/2006 LETNER ROOFING CO INC
AP - 00233260 2/15/2006 LETNER ROOFING CO INC
AP - 00233260 2/15/2006 LETNER ROOFING CO INC
AP - 00233262 2/15/2006 LIGHTNING ARROW ELECTRIC INC
AP - 00233265 2/15/2006 LUJAN, VALERIE
AP - 00233266 2/15/2006 MAIN STREET SIGNS
AP - 00233269 2/15/2006 MANEUNSONE, LUCY
AP - 00233270 2/15/2006 MANSOURI,IRAJ
AP - 00233271 2/15/2006 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC
AP - 00233271 2/15/2006 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC
AP - 00233271 2/15/2006 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC
AP - 00233271 2/15/2006 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC
AP - 00233271 2/15/2006 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC
AP - 00233271 2/15/2006 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC
AP - 00233271 2/15/2006 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC
AP - 00233271 2/15/2006 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC
AP - 00233272 2/15/2006 MCCAUGHEY, WILLIAM
AP - 00233273 2/15/2006 MCGALLIARD & SONS INC, J B
AP - 00233273 2/15/2006 MCGALLIARD & SONS INC, J B
AP - 00233273 2/15/2006 MCGALLIARD & SONS INC, J B
AP - 00233273 2/15/2006 MCGALLIARD & SONS INC, J B
AP - 00233273 2/15/2006 MCGALLIARD & SONS INC, J B
AP - 00233273 2/15/2006 MCGALLIARD & SONS INC, J B
AP - 00233274 2/15/2006 MCI
AP - 00233275 2/15/2006 MDL GROUP INC
AP - 00233277 2/15/2006 MEGA WAY ENTERPRISES
AP - 00233278 2/15/2006 MEJIA, JOSE
AP - 00233279 2/15/2006 MICOCCI PRODUCTIONS
AP - 00233280 2/15/2006 MIGLIACCI, THERESA
AP - 00233281 2/15/2006 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY
AP - 00233282 2/15/2006 MILLER, SEVIM
AP - 00233283 2/15/2006 M1TSUBISH1 ELECTRIC & ELECTRONICS USA n
AP - 00233283 2/15/2006 MlTSUBISHI ELECTRIC & ELECTRONICS USA n
AP - 00233284 2/15/2006 MORGAN, SCULLY
AP - 00:2}3285_ . _ 2/15/2006 . MORGAN, SELENA
User: KFINCHER - Karen Fincher Page: 17
Report:CK _AGENDA_REG ]OR TRAIT _ RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
976.57
599.00
541.80
541.80
541.80
5,700.00
6,525.00
541.80
541.80
599.00
599.00
599.00
599.00
284.26
193.55
927.53
87.01
124.00
22,568.86
2,165.70
-2,256.89
-216.56
16.04
73.55
598.01
500.00
4,800.00
3,681.56
3,464.17
130.61
8,801.15
17,462.73
9,093.84
5,078.68
1,263.37
600.00
20,215.56
-1,765.78
-255.01
-2,021.56
17,657.84
2,550.10
378.02
1,508.50
72.36
59.00
1,200.00
105.00
4,500.00
53.78
2,871.00
-287.10
15.00
56.45
Current Date: 02/22/;
/ 1 Time: 15:2
Check No.
AP - 00233286
AP - 00233287
AP - 00233290
AP - 00233291
AP - 00233292
AP - 00233292
AP - 00233293
AP - 00233293
AP - 00233293
AP - 00233293
AP - 00233294
AP - 00233295
AP - 00233296
AP - 00233296
AP - 00233296
AP - 00233296
AP - 00233296
AP - 00233296
AP - 00233296
AP - 00233296
AP - 00233297
AP - 00233298
AP - 00233299
AP - 00233300
AP - 00233301
AP - 00233302
AP - 00233303
AP - 00233304
AP - 00233305
AP - 00233306
AP - 00233307
AP - 00233308
AP - 00233309
AP - 00233309
AP - 00233309
AP - 00233309
AP - 00233309
AP - 00233309
AP - 00233311
AP - 00233311
AP - 00233313
AP - 00233314
AP - 00233315
AP - 00233315
AP - 00233315
AP - 00233315
AP - 00233315
AP - 00233315
AP - 00233315
AP - 00233315
AP - 00233315
AP - 00233315
AP - 00233315
AP - 00233315
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Al!enda Check Rel!ister
2/8/2006 through 2121/2006
Check Date Vendor Name
2/1512006 MOUNTAIN VIEW GLASS AND MIRROR INC
2/1512006 N A T I A
2/1512006 NATIONAL DEFERRED
2/15/2006 NATO, mLIET
2/1512006 NBS
2/15/2006 NBS
2/1512006 NEC BUSINESS NETWORK SOLUTIONS INC
2/15/2006 NEC BUSINESS NETWORK SOLUTIONS INC
2/1512006 NEC BUSINESS NETWORK SOLUTIONS INC
2/15/2006 NEC BUSINESS NETWORK SOLUTIONS INC
2/15/2006 NEW YORK STAGE ORIGINALS
2/1512006 NINYO AND MOORE GEOTECHNICAL
2/1512006 OFFICE DEPOT
2/1512006 OFFICE DEPOT
2/1512006 OFFICE DEPOT
2/15/2006 OFFICE DEPOT
2/1512006 OFFICE DEPOT
2/15/2006 OFFICE DEPOT
2/15/2006 OFFICE DEPOT
2/1512006 OFFICE DEPOT
2/1512006 OFTELIE, LIND SA Y
2/15/2006 ONESOURCE DISTRIBUTORS INe.
2/1512006 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE
2/15/2006 ORONA, PATRICIA
2/1512006 OWEN ELECTRIC INC
2/1512006 PAHIA, REGINALD
2/1512006 PARAGON BUILDING PRODUCTS INC
2/15/2006 PASCUA, MARY ANN
2/15/2006 PEREZ CO LLC
2/1512006 PHONG, BRYAN
2/1512006 PITNEY BOWES
2/15/2006 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC
2/15/2006 PREFERRED CEILINGS INC
2/1512006 PREFERRED CEILINGS INC
2/15/2006 PREFERRED CEILINGS INC
2/15/2006 PREFERRED CEILINGS INC
2/15/2006 PREFERRED CEILINGS INC
2/1512006 PREFERRED CEILINGS INC
2/1512006 PRIZIO CONSTRUCTION INC
2/15/2006 PRIZIO CONSTRUCTION INC
2/1512006 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY
2/1512006 PVC ASSOCIATION
2/1512006 RAND R AUTOMOTIVE
2/1512006 RAND R AUTOMOTIVE
2/15/2006 RAND R AUTOMOTIVE
2/1512006 RANDRAUTOMOTIVE
2/1512006 RAND R AUTOMOTIVE
2/15/2006 RAND R AUTOMOTIVE
2/1512006 RAND R AUTOMOTIVE
2/15/2006 RAND R AUTOMOTIVE
2/15/2006 RAND R AUTOMOTIVE
2/15/2006 RAND R AUTOMOTIVE
2/1512006 RAND R AUTOMOTIVE
2/15/2006 RAND R AUTOMOTIVE
Amount
747.22
25.00
17,866.23
34.00
1,500.00
250.00
260.00
185.00
300.00
185.00
2,450.00
1,071.25
103.25
-10.65
64.14
97.88
90.09
10.65
83.18
195.44
500.00
257.52
8.33
1,000.00
25.86
108.17
56.57
500.00
892.50
80.00
266.52
34.20
2,794.76
1,018.17
2,597.10
-279.48
-259.71
-101.81
4,988.56
-498.86
7.00
110.00
226.27
602.84
741.01
33.74
49.14
44.01
459.69
61.62
476.87
552.63
85.91
80.29
Current Date: 02/22/;
/ 5? Time: 15:2
User: KFINCHER - Karen Fincher Page: 18
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Registe, Portrait Layout
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Al!enda Check Rel!ister
2/8/2006 through 2/21/2006
Check No.
Check Date Vendor Name
AP - 00233315 2/15/2006 RAND RAUTOMOTIVE
AP - 00233315 2/15/2006 RAND R AUTOMOTIVE
AP - 00233315 2/15/2006 RAND RAUTOMOTIVE
AP - 00233315 2/15/2006 RAND R AUTOMOTIVE
AP - 00233315 2/15/2006 RAND R AUTOMOTIVE
AP - 00233315 2/15/2006 RAND R AUTOMOTIVE
AP-00233315 2/15/2006 RANDRAUTOMOTIVE
AP-00233315 2/15/2006 RANDRAUTOMOTIVE
AP - 00233315 2/15/2006 RAND R AUTOMOTIVE
AP - 00233315 2/15/2006 RAND RAUTOMOTIVE
AP-00233315 2/15/2006 RANDRAUTOMOTIVE
AP - 00233315 2/15/2006 RAND RAUTOMOTIVE
AP-00233315 2/15/2006 RANDRAUTOMOTIVE
AP - 00233315 2/15/2006 RAND RAUTOMOTIVE
AP - 00233316 2/15/2006 RAE, DOUGLASS
AP - 00233318 2/15/2006 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI
AP - 00233319 2/15/2006 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FONTANA FAMILY YM
AP - 00233320 2/15/2006 RANCHO CUCAMONGA OFFICE LLC
AP - 00233321 2/15/2006 RAULS AUTO TRIM INC
AP - 00233322 2/15/2006 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE
AP - 00233323 2/15/2006 RCPFA
AP - 00233324 2/15/2006 RDO EQUIPMENT COMPANY
AP - 00233324 2/15/2006 RDO EQUIPMENT COMPANY
AP - 00233325 2/15/2006 REEPS DATA COM SERVICE
AP - 00233326 2/15/2006 RELIABLE GRAPHICS
AP - 00233327 2/15/2006 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON
AP - 00233327 2/15/2006 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON
AP - 00233328 2/15/2006 RICHARDSON, GLENN
AP - 00233329 2/15/2006 ROBERT HALF TECHNOLOGY
AP - 00233329 2/15/2006 ROBERT HALF TECHNOLOGY
AP - 00233329 2/15/2006 ROBERT HALF TECHNOLOGY
AP - 00233329 2/15/2006 ROBERT HALF TECHNOLOGY
AP - 00233330 2/15/2006 ROBLES SR, RAUL P
AP - 00233330 2/15/2006 ROBLES SR, RAUL P
AP - 00233331 2/15/2006 ROCK BOTIOM TOWING INC
AP - 00233332 2/15/2006 RODRIGUEZ INC, R Y
AP - 00233332 2/15/2006 RODRIGUEZ INC, R Y
AP - 00233333 2/15/2006 RODRIGUEZ, NORMA LINDA
AP - 00233334 2/15/2006 RODRIGUEZ, ROMMEL
AP - 00233338 2/15/2006 SAMBRANO, TERESA
AP - 00233340 2/15/2006 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
AP - 00233341 2/15/2006 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
AP - 00233342 2/15/2006 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
AP - 00233343 2/15/2006 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT
AP - 00233343 2/15/2006 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT
AP - 00233343 2/15/2006 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT
AP - 00233344 2/15/2006 SAPIEN, RAMON
AP - 00233345 2/15/2006 SAXE-CLIFFORD, SUSAN
AP - 00233346 2/15/2006 SBC LONG DISTANCE
AP - 00233347 2/15/2006 SBC
AP - 00233347 2/15/2006 SBC
AP - 00233348 2/15/2006 SEMMATERIALS L P
AP - 00233350 2/15/2006 SHARIF!, MARK
AP - 00233352 2/15/2006 SHIPLEY, BONNIE
--- -----
User: KFINCHER - Karen Fincher Page: 19
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Registe, Portrait Layout
Amount
100.44
156.12
33.74
33.74
33.74
47.03
302.15
370.88
394.83
480.17
32.89
404.87
49.14
79.99
330.54
25.00
20,923.88
2,068.38
120.00
2.42
6,550.65
8.08
129.58
138.21
53.40
5,860.83
390.00
450.00
1,120.00
840.00
840.00
1,120.00
125.00
60.00
49.03
942.40
240.00
718.61
250.00
250.00
36.00
732.00
300.00
1,585,215.00
17,570.00
13,642.00
15.00
350.00
2,459.89
2,620.80
55.32
171.69
250.00
38.69
Current Date: 02/22/:
/ q Time: 15:2
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Al!enda Check Rel!ister
2/8/2006 through 2/21/2006
Check No.
Check Date Vendor Name
Amount
AP - 00233353 2/1 5/2006 SIERRA SPRINGS
AP - 00233355 2/1512006 SING A LONG PRODUCfIONS LTD
AP - 00233356 2/15/2006 SMIDERL Y, FRANY
AP - 00233357 2/15/2006 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY
AP - 00233357 2/1512006 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY
AP - 00233357 2/1512006 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY
AP - 00233357 2/1512006 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY
AP - 00233357 2/15/2006 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY
AP - 00233358 2/15/2006 SOLlDEAL TIRE INC
AP - 00233359 2/15/2006 SONITROL OF SAN BERNARDINO
AP - 00233359 2/15/2006 SONITROL OF SAN BERNARDINO
AP - 00233360 2/1512006 SOUNDZSKILZ ENTERTAINMENT
AP - 00233361 2/15/2006 SOUTH COAST AQMD
AP - 00233365 2/1512006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2/15/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2/1512006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2/1512006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2/15/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2/15/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2/15/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2/1512006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2/1512006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2/1512006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2/1512006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2/1512006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2/1512006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2/15/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2115/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2/1512006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 211512006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2/1512006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2/1512006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2/1512006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2/15/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2/15/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2/1512006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2/15/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2/1512006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2/15/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2/1512006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2/15/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2/15/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2/1512006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2/1512006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2/15/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2/15/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2/1512006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2/15/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2/1512006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2/15/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2/1 5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2/15/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2/15/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2/1512006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
--------
User: KFINCHER - Karen Fincher Page: 20
Report:CK _AGENDA_REG ~PORTRAIT ~ RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
145.80
600.00
5.20.00
4,298.99
5,310.25
634.08
1,037.17
462.33
3,309.00
48.15
48.15
300.00
102.36
14.12
13.63
13.63
14.49
13.63
75.76
70.05
17.16
14.40
13.74
13.63
71.39
52.91
94.19
13.74
13.63
135.99
15.26
13.63
13.63
13.90
94.13
56.71
13.63
13.65
13.63
13.63
13.63
14.40
13.16
111.18
124.85
14.77
35.18
13.63
13.63
13.16
13.63
58.77
14.03
103.30
Current Date: 02122/;
20 Time: 15:2
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Al!enda Check Rel!ister
2/8/2006 through 2/21/2006
Check No.
Check Date Vendor Name
Amount
AP - 00233365 211 512006 SOUTIlERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2/1512006 SOUTIlERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2/1512006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2/15/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2/1512006 SOUTIlERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2/15/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2115/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2/1512006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2115/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2/1512006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2/1512006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2115/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2/15/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2115/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2/1512006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 211 512006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2/15/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2/1512006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2/1512006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2115/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 211512006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2/15/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 211512006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 211512006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 211512006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2/1512006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2115/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 211512006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2115/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 211512006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2/15/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2/15/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 211512006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 211512006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2/1512006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2115/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2/1512006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2/15/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 211512006 SOUTIlERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2/15/2006 SOUTIlERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2115/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2/15/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2/15/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 211 5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2/1512006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2/1512006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2/1512006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2/15/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2/1512006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2/1512006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 211512006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2/1512006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2/15/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AP - 00233365 2115/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
- ~----- --..-.----
User: KFINCHER - Karen Finche, Page: 21
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
71.13
14.24
14.10
83.57
13.63
13.63
13.16
14.00
25.73
78.61
130.08
100.92
15.73
13.63
48.16
0.29
57.84
13.63
14.76
14.49
15.48
15.96
57.10
1,040.34
22.82
14.98
13.63
72.80
145.22
93.21
141.41
13.16
13.03
34.71
13.16
58.80
149.78
14.49
532.43
145.84
141.76
13.16
34.68
48.46
107.90
57.29
13.63
24.87
26.89
13.63
42.97
8.24
20.31
76.68
Current Date: 02/22/;
2 / Time: 15:2
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Ae:enda Check Ree:ister
2/8/2006 through 2/21/2006
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00233365 2/15/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 6,287.50
AP - 00233365 2/1512006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 66.17
AP - 00233365 2/15/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.40
AP - 00233365 2/15/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.63
AP - 00233365 2/t 5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.21
AP - 00233365 2/15/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.42
AP - 00233365 2/1512006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.67
AP - 00233365 2/1512006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.01
AP - 00233365 2/1512006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 56.07
AP - 00233365 2/1512006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 73.82
AP - 00233365 2/1512006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 196.83
AP - 00233365 2/1512006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 113.22
AP - 00233365 2/15/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.61
AP - 00233365 2/1512006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.16
AP - 00233365 2/15/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.42
AP - 00233365 2/15/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 47.20
AP - 00233365 2/1512006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 28.96
AP - 00233365 2/15/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 98.16
AP - 00233365 2/15/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 47.73
AP - 00233365 2/15/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 29.55
AP - 00233365 2/1512006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 28.61
AP - 00233365 2/15/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.77
AP - 00233365 2/1512006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 30.31
AP - 00233365 2/15/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 815.85
AP - 00233366 2/1512006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19,429.89
AP - 00233366 2/1512006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14,992.80
AP - 00233366 2/15/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12,120.96
AP - 00233366 2/15/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 4,212.90
AP - 00233366 2/15/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,727.75
AP - 00233366 2/15/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 181.47
AP - 00233366 2/1512006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 46.23
AP - 00233366 2/1512006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 84.43
AP - 00233366 2/1512006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 47.27
AP - 00233366 2/1512006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 41.13
AP - 00233366 2/1512006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 54.37
AP - 00233366 2/1512006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 6,476.77
AP - 00233366 2/15/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 7,628.25
AP - 00233366 2/1512006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 579.30
AP - 00233366 2/1512006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 46.02
AP - 00233366 2/1512006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.43
AP - 00233366 2/15/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,699.16
AP - 00233366 2/1512006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,702.66
AP - 00233366 2/15/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 39,645.17
AP - 00233366 2/15/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 44.24
AP - 00233366 2/1512006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,868.67
AP - 00233368 2/15/2006 SOUTHWEST MOBILE STORAGE INC 175.60
AP - 00233369 2/15/2006 STANDARD DRYWALL INC 102,243.73
AP - 00233369 2/15/2006 STANDARD DRYWALL INC -10,224.37
AP - 00233369 2/1512006 STANDARD DRYWALL INC -1,370.48
AP - 00233369 2/1512006 STANDARD DR YW ALL INC -19,634.30
AP - 00233369 2/15/2006 STANDARD DRYWALL INC 13,704.76
AP - 00233369 2/1512006 STANDARD DRYWALL INC 196,343.00
AP - 00233370 2/1512006 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 678.27
AP - 00233371 2/15/2006 STROUD, ANN 110.00
-- -- .-----. ----
User: KFINCHER - Karen Fincher Page: 22 Current Date: 02122/;
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Registe, Portrait Layout 22 Time: 15:2
Check No.
AP - 00233372
AP - 00233373
AP - 00233374
AP - 00233375
AP - 00233376
AP - 00233378
AP - 00233379
AP - 00233380
AP - 00233381
AP - 00233381
AP - 00233382
AP - 00233382
AP - 00233382
AP - 00233382
AP - 00233382
AP - 00233382
AP - 00233382
AP - 00233382
AP - 00233382
AP - 00233382
AP - 00233382
AP - 00233382
AP - 00233382
AP - 00233382
AP - 00233382
AP - 00233382
AP - 00233382
AP - 00233382
AP - 00233382
AP - 00233382
AP - 00233382
AP - 00233382
AP - 00233382
AP - 00233382
AP - 00233384
AP - 00233384
AP - 00233384
AP - 00233384
AP - 00233384
AP - 00233384
AP - 00233384
AP - 00233384
AP - 00233384
AP - 00233384
AP - 00233384
AP - 00233384
AP - 00233385
AP - 00233385
AP - 00233386
AP - 00233387
AP - 00233388
AP - 00233389
AP - 00233391
AP - 00233392
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Al!enda Check Rel!ister
2/812006 through 2/21/2006
Check Date Vendor Name
Amount
2/15/2006 SUN, THE
2/1512006 SUTTON, MEGAN
2/1512006 T AND D INSTALLATIONS
2/15/2006 TABBA, HAYAT
2/1512006 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS
2/1512006 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR CORPORATION
2/15/2006 TRAFFIC SPECIALTIES INC
2/15/2006 TRAGER DVORAK, DENISE
2/15/2006 TRIMARK PACIFIC HOMES
2/15/2006 TRIMARK PACIFIC HOMES
2/15/2006 TRUGREEN LANDCARE
2/15/2006 TRUGREEN LANDCARE
2/15/2006 TRUGREEN LANDCARE
2/15/2006 TRUGREEN LANDCARE
2/15/2006 TRUGREEN LANDCARE
2/15/2006 TRUGREEN LANDCARE
2/15/2006 TRUGREEN LANDCARE
2/15/2006 TRUGREEN LANDCARE
2/15/2006 TRUGREEN LANDCARE
2/1512006 TRUGREEN LAND CARE
2/15/2006 TRUGREEN LAND CARE
2/1512006 TRUGREEN LAND CARE
2/15/2006 TRUGREEN LAND CARE
2/15/2006 TRUGREEN LANDCARE
2/15/2006 TRUGREEN LANDCARE
2/15/2006 TRUGREEN LANDCARE
2/15/2006 TRUGREEN LANDCARE
2/15/2006 TRUGREEN LANDCARE
2/15/2006 TRUGREEN LANDCARE
2/15/2006 TRUGREEN LANDCARE
2/15/2006 TRUGREEN LANDCARE
2/15/2006 TRUGREEN LANDCARE
2/15/2006 TRUGREEN LANDCARE
2/1512006 TRUGREEN LANDCARE
2/15/2006 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE
2/1512006 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE
2/15/2006 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE
2/15/2006 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE
2/15/2006 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE
2/15/2006 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE
2/1512006 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE
2/15/2006 UNIFIRSTUNIFORM SERVICE
2/15/2006 UNIFIRSTUNIFORM SERVICE
2/15/2006 UNIFIRSTUNIFORM SERVICE
2/1512006 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE
2/15/2006 UNIFIRSTUNIFORM SERVICE
2/15/2006 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR p,
2/1512006 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR p,
2/15/2006 UNITED RENTALS NORTHWEST INC
2/1512006 UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CA INC
2/1512006 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
2/15/2006 UNITED WAY
2/1512006 UPSHAW, LYDIA
2/15/2006 UPS
165.60
64.00
52.33
40.00
258.00
222.42
153.54
500.00
5,000.00
1,000.00
4,513.98
7,035.41
459.19
70,238.00
24,265.92
1,686.41
179.17
224.58
2,429.26
1,871.04
848.48
3,028.66
1,261.83
780.14
15,515.47
16,705.15
52.83
19,87214
793.47
3,068.58
384.28
3,208.29
112.87
600.06
60.15
660.12
901.10
766.90
31.82
157.53
44.86
92.04
44.86
31.82
160.44
35.68
3,045.15
35,779.01
450.99
132.71
160.00
41.00
250.00
25.66
Current Date: 02/22/;
23 Time: 15:2
User: KFINCHER - Karen Fincher Page: 23
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG]ORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Al!enda Check Rel!ister
2/8/2006 through 2/21/2006
Check No.
Check Date Vendor Name
Amount
AP - 00233392 2/15/2006 UPS
AP - 00233392 2/15/2006 UPS
AP - 00233392 2/15/2006 UPS
AP - 00233393 2/15/2006 US POS1MASTER
AP - 00233395 2/15/2006 VANDERHAWK CONSULTING LLC
AP - 00233397 2/15/2006 VERIZON
AP - 00233397 2/15/2006 VERIZON
AP - 00233397 2/15/2006 VERIZON
AP - 00233397 2/15/2006 VERIZON
AP - 00233397 2/15/2006 VERIZON
AP - 00233397 2/15/2006 VERIZON
AP - 00233397 2/15/2006 VERIZON
AP - 00233397 2/15/2006 VERIZON
AP - 00233397 2/15/2006 VERIZON
AP - 00233397 2/15/2006 VERIZON
AP - 00233397 2/15/2006 VERIZON
AP - 00233397 2/15/2006 VERIZON
AP - 00233397 2/15/2006 VERIZON
AP - 00233397 2/15/2006 VERIZON
AP - 00233397 2/15/2006 VERIZON
AP - 00233397 2/15/2006 VERIZON
AP - 00233397 2/15/2006 VERIZON
AP - 00233397 2/15/2006 VERIZON
AP - 00233397 2/15/2006 VERIZON
AP - 00233397 2/15/2006 VERIZON
AP - 00233397 2/15/2006 VERIZON
AP - 00233397 2/15/2006 VERIZON
AP - 00233397 2/15/2006 VERIZON
AP - 00233397 2/1512006 VERIZON
AP - 00233397 2/1512006 VERIZON
AP - 00233397 2/1512006 VERIZON
AP - 00233397 2/15/2006 VERIZON
AP - 00233397 2/1512006 VERIZON
AP - 00233397 2/1512006 VERIZON
AP - 00233397 2/15/2006 VERIZON
AP - 00233397 2/15/2006 VERIZON
AP - 00233397 2/15/2006 VERIZON
AP - 00233397 2/1512006 VERIZON
AP - 00233397 2/15/2006 VERIZON
AP - 00233397 2/15/2006 VERIZON
AP - 00233397 2/15/2006 VERIZON
AP - 00233397 2/1512006 VERIZON
AP - 00233397 2/15/2006 VERIZON
AP - 00233397 2/15/2006 VERIZON
AP - 00233398 2/15/2006 VERIZON
AP - 00233399 2/15/2006 VIRTUAL PROJECT MANAGER INC
AP - 00233400 2/1512006 VISTA PAINT
AP - 00233401 2/15/2006 VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY
AP - 00233401 2/1512006 VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY
AP - 00233401 2/15/2006 VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY
AP - 00233403 2/15/2006 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO
AP - 00233404 2/15/2006 WALTERS, STEPHANIE
AP - 00233404 2/1512006 WALTERS, STEPHANIE
AP - 00233405 2/15/2006 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY
- --~- ---
User: KFINCHER - Karen Fincher Page: 24
Report: CK _AGENDA_REG ]ORTRAIT _ RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
17.01
17.40
22.44
1,000.00
11,276.30
21.26
18.10
105.00
90.06
29.90
28.40
29.36
18.22
18.22
18.22
28.40
109.90
90.06
90.06
90.06
29.36
32.01
130.22
34.78
173.98
91.52
90.06
90.06
90.06
90.06
90.06
27.43
29.90
18.19
28.40
18.22
29.36
29.36
29.36
91.52
58.31
88.96
38.84
90.06
29.28
500.00
1,064.15
132.55
371.19
132.55
262.19
109.96
46.00
248.93
Current Date: 02/22/;
2 4 Time: i5:2
Check No.
AP - 00233405
AP - 00233405
AP - 00233405
AP - 00233405
AP - 00233405
AP - 00233405
AP - 00233406
AP - 00233407
AP - 00233407
AP - 00233408
AP - 00233409
AP - 00233410
AP - 00233411
AP - 00233412
AP - 00233414
AP - 00233415
AP - 00233415
AP - 00233415
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Al!enda Check Rel!ister
2/8/2006 through 2/21/2006
Check Date Vendor Name
Amount
2/15/2006 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY
2/15/2006 W AXlE SANITARY SUPPLY
2/15/2006 W AXlE SANITARY SUPPLY
2/15/2006 W AXlE SANITARY SUPPLY
2/15/2006 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY
2/15/2006 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY
2/15/2006 WEIR, JEWELL
2/15/2006 WEST END FAMILY COUNSELING SERVICES
2/15/2006 WEST END FAMILY COUNSELING SERVICES
2/15/2006 WEST GROUP
2/15/2006 WEST PAYMENT CENTER
2/15/2006 WHITE CAP CONST SUPPLY
2/15/2006 WILLIAMS, ALBERT
2/15/2006 WUMBUS CORPORATION
2/15/2006 YOUNG, SANDRA
2/16/2006 DELTA M1CROIMAGlNG INC
2/16/2006 DELTA MICROIMAGING INC
2/16/2006 DELTA M1CROIMAGING INC
-117.99
47212
1,450.38
56.00
9.31
231.36
240.00
10,885.98
7,374.65
381.40
102.40
483.36
264.00
1,090.53
36.00
265.71
430.03
215.28
4,248,438.31
4,248,438.31
Total for Check ID AP:
Total for Entity:
User: KFINCHER - Karen Fincher Page: 25
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
Current Date:
:2 .5 Time:
02/22/;
15:2
STAFF REpORT
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Date: March 1, 2006
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
From: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
By: Jerry Dyer, Senior Civil Engineer
Subject: APPROVAL OF AN APPROPRIATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $50,000 FROM PARK
DEVELOPMENT (FUND 120) FUND BALANCE TO ACCOUNT NO.
11203055650/1519120-0 FOR THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC TRAIL PHASE III FROM
ARCHIBALD AVENUE TO HAVEN AVENUE TO COVER THE COSTS FOR
LANDSCAPE DESIGN SERVICES
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the appropriation in the amount of $50,000 from
Park Development (fund 120) fund balance to Account No. 11203055650/1519120-0 for the Pacific
Electric Trail Phase III from Archibald Avenue to Haven Avenue to cover the costs for landscape
design services.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The Rails-to-Trails is proceeding quickly toward construction dates during this calendar year.
Currently the entire system from Grove Avenue to Interstate 15 is divided into five (5) phases.
Some phases are on a 'fast-track' for design and construction. The other phases will follow shortly
thereafter.
This appropriation will cover the costs incurred for landscape design services that were
inadvertently left out in the internal account transfer of funds approved by council on January 18,
2006. This appropriation should complete the needs to bring this phase to a final plan and
specification stage for bidding purposes.
Respectfully submitted,
(flit- C/{,~t-0
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:JAD
2fo
> . ~
::1
~~w. . J
~~ III
I [Y
V ...
di · ~ ~~
r -'- - MIUI!<EN I'~ / tf...--
~-. ~wi I ~ ~~~~~?, ~
"f7.. E r J7' ---..A t"
: ~,. r;::::: .:::-'-
ARC~r. .~.., ~
: 1\. ~'.. ~ ~
iB=-< . ~,I W -.. ~ ......
CARNE~N .' \\ . ~
'. I 1 V . x
I -'....J...' \ _ ~_~.~::-/ "i
~ \.... -I--:'...... ~.~ I
. :.-- 0 ~ _..J-
-.; .~~'t . ~ 31 I
!
/
oil
t::l
o
i IS ~
II as-
g~
Ufo-<
.,go
uf-o
~~
~-
'C)~
e-
....
U
"'q,
.v+
.
\C
.
-$}
. ?
o
l;l
..
--j
t,- - ~
~ j'
'~4 ~ ~
I
.1 ·
I ETIWANDA;"
l 'M~~ .
.' l~
.......- tH
t. 3" E
u ~.
.. . ! .
"' .
.....,.u..lI.1 ~&
It!!
, .
B .
r"l-'
I
I
'T'
"I-
'-
-
""':::t: :
)
--.....::I: !<EN
EN
........
I f
Q
I~
/
17 VINEYARD
113>111'8
3^CllI9
...
21%-+~
THE
C I T Y
o F
RANCtlO CUCAMONGA
Staff Report
DATE: March 1, 2005
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Dan Coleman, Acting City Planner
BY: Tabe van der Zwaag, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF A PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY
DETERMINATION - DRC2006-00085 - Han Ma Eum Market - A request to issue
a Public Convenience or Necessity determination for a Type 20 off-sale beer and
wine license for an Asian food store in the Community Commercial District,
located on the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rarnona Avenue at
9849 Foothill Boulevard, Unit M - APN: 0208-301-16.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the determination of a
Public Convenience or Necessity for Han Ma Eum Market through the adoption of the attached
Resolution of Approval, and forward a copy to the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control
(ABC).
ANALYSIS:
A. Backqround: The Han Ma Eum Market is located at the southwest corner of Ramona
Avenue and Foothill Boulevard, as shown on the attached Site Plan (Exhibit A). The
applicant's establishment specializes in Asian food products including meats, produce,
and packaged goods. They do not sell videos or have coin-operated amusement devices.
They are open on Monday through Sunday from 9:00 a,m, to 9:00 p.m. and on Sundays
from 10:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m.
B. Reauirements from Department of Alcohol Beveraae Control: The Department of Alcohol
Beverage Control (ABC) regulates the distribution of liquor licenses by setting limits on the
various types of licenses in each census tract. The limits are calculated based on the ratio
of liquor licenses to the population of the census tract. According to the ABC staff, the
off-sale and on-sale licenses in this census tract (0021) total 23. This is 6 over the limit of
the 17 licenses, thus necessitates a finding of Public Convenience or Necessity.
Additionally, the ABC staff stated that a finding of Public Convenience or Necessity (PCN)
is required by the local agency (as governed by Section 23958 of the Business and
Professional Code), because of a moratorium on all new ABC licenses within
z~
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
HAN MA EUM MARKET - DRC2006-00085
March 1 , 2006
Page 2
San Bernardino County, The legislation purposely left the term Public Convenience or
Necessity undefined, so that the local legislative body, in this case the City Council, would
have the greatest latitude for discretion based on the local conditions and circumstances.
C. Facts to Support a Public Convenience or Necessitv Determination:
The following are facts to support the requested Public Convenience or Necessity.
Fact: A retailer of alcoholic beverages, specialty foods, and other related items is a
common and accepted business.
Fact: The site is located at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Ramona
Avenue; Foothill Boulevard is designated as a major thoroughfare, and the site is
suited for this type of business,
Fact: The census tract in which the site is located (0021), also includes the Ontario
Mills shopping center in the City of Ontario, which has a large number of
restaurants with alcohol licenses, The Ontario Mills shopping center is physically
separated from the majority of residential neighborhoods in Rancho Cucamonga
by an industrial district, greatly diminishing potential negative effects that an
additional alcohol license will have on the City's residential neighborhoods.
Fact: The site is not close to sensitive users, such as day care facilities, schools,
and/or churches,
Fact: Rancho Cucamonga residents would be afforded more convenient shoPpin9
opportunities with the addition of beer and wine to the current selection of Asian
food prOducts provided by the market.
Based on the above analysis, staff finds that the off-sale beer and wine license
ite will ha e a negative impact to the surrounding uses.
Dan Coleman
Acting City Planner
DC:TV/ge
Attachments: Exhibit A - Project Location
Exhibit B - Aerial
Exhibit C - Census Map
Exhibit 0 - ABC Application Work Sheet
Resolution of Approval for Public Convenience and Necessity DRC2006-00085
21
'" ;> . ~ .. 1
5 .. jjj g v.
to :z
~ .. .- 0 ..
r "
(j I- "0 OMf! UOM~H <- <- ':;S ~
- 'HaveR Ave & - > ,-.
9
;;
(!)
~
o~
eAV f8JU8;)
CMV J81u:>;)
in
in 'E! to
~ ~ ~
E }l
~ 0
z
In
in ~
u
" .~
B 0
6, ifl z
""~ "
. t
~
.
J:
in
in in .
in i .b
'E! 1
. .3 oil E
j!! e .
w "' :I:
ifl 8A'Ii ltSOuuaH
.
~
w
A8M )(t"Ol
OuvonshtrG
1&!U8WOS
EU!4SlJOA
fM'rJ cuowe"'o.J
,old V't.t'f U
."~ 0 'If U
q!~E!d 'it~ '. ,.---
.... \%
'It. ~ '"
i'- .......
,,0 W
~
~ in ....
'" 7J> -
per to c " . J CJ)
Jadailo AVI1 " .. " .h
Ui 'E! 'E . > '[
'" . ;.; iii I-
ill w
. " " '" E E
c c " . . U
it ~ . "' .. :0 :I:
o!! " '5 W
" . &
. w Ul
~ ..,
IS I!l;Mn8U.I'd 0
IS ""l"0, ~
0..
in
'g In
.
E ~ JOJ~e:J
. "
:I: >-- ~ ~
" '" ,
c ~
'\j ." " "
" 'i" 0 c
3 '.. MJntat ~ m ~ (J ifl
E in m
. "
.. . 'C 0
" u . ..0
~
In . il E
'" Ul w ii"
~ 81>'1;( IOu!dg
~ ~
,
~ Saulgme Dr
u E
~ JQ 06Plli ""''''.M
112
fM'tj p:J~.(au!^
"
>
iii
'1-4"
j>
",of'
4'
:0
'5
n
~
EXHIBIT A
'"
Ii
~
Conler Avo
....
i!j~ '.""'s
rd ap!S")!aalO
to <Ii
, ~ .
.
u Ii
. :I:
ii: .
to 1!.:I ~ '"
g
"
In
f
'"
JQ MDt~
<Ii eNrI t!ttOwetj
. in
..
s .~
"
;;
Ul
ii
.
~
.
. (J in
'" Avo . .
'. . ~
> . i$
Avo 0
.., ..
l'i 0"
OH
~
'.
,.
..,
l'i
SA", I"WIOH
to
~
.,
.;;
epIU9/l'\t'
to
.
.
'.
,.
..,
l'i
R
15
'"
FI
ii
~
30
,.,~...
0'J' ,,71
'1' .," .....I~, ",' ,,'
.. ,/ .
~ "<. ~
-1.;..: ""-
J I_~:::
_,.;~ij~
i.
:"-:.,,,_~,-;1-
i Jot j ",;;
:C.. 'I ,~
r,.~,." !
~A
!," ' '
,',; 2\ ,;iitt,. ; ':-
.,., ~ ....~y~
'.~"",
j" : W
, ;". '
.d .
.J ... (
\" . .t
W
I-
-
en
I-
()
W
,
o
0:::
Q.
,~ ...
I
.-
~
.
. ". -";>fa
''ill
.'_ _.....-it-.'
EXHIBIT B
~. ...._~-----..
[i "', =c'
'r- -
. 1
. I ,"
"'" ~' I -'~
- ';'1 :
-.,_...",
.~
:m
~I
I~
~..->">!1
...;.,
\
~.if:
3/
\
I '-
I' \. -, I
I
~ \. r
~ \
'(\I I
0
I 0
I
CD
CD J
eN
CD ro
., . .,~ .. ,
T'l'"
V 0
~
I 0
I \ (\I
\ 0
,
I ~ 0 /N
I 0 ~~
I 0 ' CO
I (\I CD
CD CD
~ CD
'\,,~
CD
(N
-
Q)"O
-l!:>
(Il-
::!:~
E:c
:::l-
Q)O
(Ilo::!:
::!:~Q)
C"ll:t~
(Il IX) :::l
:I:CJ)<n
~
<0
; ~..~
I I
I~l
I
I
I
I
I
,
,
I
I
I
,
,
!
'-
EXHIBIT C
'- :.
32
FEB-08-2005 07:19
STATE OF CA
909 791 0531 P,02
23958.4 B & P APPLICA nON WORK SHEET
(. ."
\. ". PREMISES ADDRESS:
qM9 h7ffl-l-lL-L- &vo
faw-kJ Cur~~vr, W1- CJ/730
LICENSE TYPE: IJFP~ (41)
1. CRIME REPORTING DISTRICT
Jurisdiction unable to provide statistical data.
Reporting District:
Total number of reporting districts:
Total number of offenses:
Average number of offenses per district:
120% of average number of offenses:
Total offenses in district:
Location is within a high crime reporting district: Yes I No
2. CENSUS TRACT I UNDUE CONCENTRATION
Census Tract: dlJ 2/.
Population: ICounty Ratio
Nurnber of licenses all~wed: ,.17
Number of existing licenses: 26
Undue concentration exists: (9 I No.
Letter of public convenience or necessity requir
Three time publication reqUirede No
~--
U f!Ju.Jat- 12/;:;/05'
-- I r
- lion Investigator
Supervisor
EXHIBIT D
OVfH
3:3 TOTAL P.02
RESOLUTION NO. 06- 053
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A DETERMINATION OF PUBLIC
CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY DRC2006,00085 FOR AN ASIAN FOOD
STORE IN THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED ON THE
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND RAMONA
AVENUE AT 9849 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, UNIT M - APN: 0208-301-16.
A, Recitals.
1. Han Ma Eum Market filed an application for Public Convenience or Necessity
determination DRC2006-00085, as described in the title of this Resolution, for a Type 20 (off-sale)
license from the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC).
2. Section 23958 of the Business and Professional Code requires the City of Rancho
Cucamonga to make a determination that the issuance of the said license will service the public
convenience or necessity.
3. On the 1st day of March 2006, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
reviewed said application prior to the adoption of this Resolution.
4. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A,
of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the
above-referenced meeting on March 1, 2006, including written and oral staff reports, this Council
hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. A retailer of alcoholic beverages, specialty foods, and other related items is a
common and accepted business; and
b. The site is located at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Ramona
Avenue; Foothill Boulevard is designated as a major thoroughfare, and the site is suited for this type
of business; and
c. The census tract in which the site is located (0021) also includes the Ontario Mills
shopping center in the City of Ontario, which has a large number of restaurants with alcohol
licenses, The Ontario Mills shopping center is physically separated from the majority of residential
neighborhoods in Rancho Cucamonga by an industrial district, greatly diminishing potential negative
effects that an additional alcohol license will have on the City's residential neighborhoods; and
.3L{
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 06-
HAN MA EUM MARKET - DRC2006-00085
March 1, 2006
Page 2
d, The site is not close to sensitive users, such as day care facilities, schools, and/or
churches; and
e. Rancho Cucamonga residents would be afforded more convenient shopping
opportunities with the addition of beer and wine to the current selection of Asian food products
provided by the market.
3. Based upon the findings set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this City Council
concludes that the issuance of an off-sale beer and wine license for Han Ma Eum Market will not
have a negative impact to the surrounding uses.
4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, and 3 above, this
City Council hereby determines that the issuance of an off-sale liquor license for Man Ma Eum
Market will service the Public Convenience or Necessity,
5. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.
3.5
STAFF REpORT
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Date:
March 1, 2006
RANCHO
CUCAMONGA
To:
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer
From:
By:
Subject:
APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND
ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B
AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DRC200S-
00086, LOCATED AT 9300 SANTA ANITA A VENUE, NORTH OF 4TH STREET,
SUBMITTED BY TRICO TCH, LTD.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions a;;Cepting the subject agreement, securities
and ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Light Maintenance District Nos.
1 and 6 and authorizing the Mayor to sign said agreement.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
DRC2005-00086, located at 9300 Santa Anita Avenue, north of 4th Street, within the General Industrial District
(Subarea 14), was approved by the City Planner on June 2, 2005. This project is for building 4 multi-tenant
industrial buildings on 4.48 acres of land.
The Developer, Trico TCH, Ltd., is submitting an agreement, securities and monumentation cash deposit to
guarantee the construction of the public improvements in the following amounts:
Faithful Performance Cash Bond
Labor and Material Cash Bond
$
$
17,900.00
8,950.00
Copies of the agreement and securities are available in the City Clerk's Office.
The Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms signed by the Developer are on file in the City Clerk's Office.
Respectfully submitted,
yot ?l U>LJ-
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:WV:pjb
Attachmcnt(s)
3~
w
FOOTHILL BOULEVARD @~
a::
w
>--
Vl
w
ARROW ROUTE :r:
, a:: 0)
w --<:-\J ~~
::>
z ~c.J D~ SITE w
w ::>
~ Q,'f ~ w z
::> w
-0CJ ' z ~
w Q
z (J ~
w a:: w
> <1: ~
<1: >-
:r: 6 TH STREET z <1:: <1:
0 Cl
>-- Z
Z Z <1:
w <1: :;:
:>:: <1: >-
:::i >-- w
~ Z
::;; 4 TH STREET <( SAN BERNARDINO AVE.
Vl
BERNARDINO
FRWY
(3
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
J:..
N
ITEM: -4tfC !l~tJ,f "'lJl!JtJJl~,
TITLE: V.fCIN,ITY M~
ENGINEERING DfVlSION
37
RESOLUTION NO. () (0 -6 S 1
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITIES FOR DRC2005-00086
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its
consideration and Improvement Agreement executed on March 1,2006, by Trico TCH, Ltd., as
Developer, for the improvement of the public right-of-way adjacent to the real property
specifically described therein, and generally located at 9300 Santa Anita Avenue, north of 4th
Street; and
WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and
sufficient Improvement Securities, which are identified in said Improvement Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES, as follows:
I. That said Improvement Agreement, be and the same is approved and the Mayor
is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is
authorized to attest thereto; and
2, That said Improvement Securities are accepted as good and sufficient, subject
to approval as to forin and content thereof by the City Attorney.
3~
RESOLUTION NO. () & - !).5 .5
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE
ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRlCT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHT
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 FOR DRC2005-
00086
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has
previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and
Lighting Act of 1972", being Division IS, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State
of California (the "72 Act"), said Landscape Maintenance District 3B, Street Lighting
Maintenance District No. I and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (referred to
collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and
WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the 72 Act authorize the
annexation of additional temtory to the Maintenance Districts; and
WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of
resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority
protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owner of property within
the territory to be annexed; and
WHEREAS, notwithstanding the such provisions of the 72 Act related to the annexation
of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XIUD of the Constitution of the State of
California ("Article XUlD") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to
levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the maintenance Districts on
the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and
WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the
"Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual
assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto
(the "Improvements"); and
WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly
executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A
Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the
"Conscnt and Waiver"); and
WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have
expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 72 Act to the
annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the
annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and
39
WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also
expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 72 Act and/or
Article XIIID applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the
Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and
have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed
annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory
to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory
in amount snot to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B hereto,
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I:
The above recitals are all true and correct
SECTION 2:
This City Council hereby finds and determines that:
a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not
exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred,on each such
parcel from the Improvements.
b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the
Improvements has been determine in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the
maintenance ofthe Improvements.
c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed
,annual assessments.
SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the
Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from
the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders
the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set
forth in Exhibit B.
SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including levy of all
assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory.
2
DRC2005-00086
Lft)
Exhibit A
Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property
To Be Annexed
The Owners of the Property are:
Trico TCH Ltd.
The legal description of the Property is:
Parcell or Parcel Map No. 4749, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino,
State of California, as per plat recorded in book 47 of parcel maps, page(s) 28 and 29, records of
said county.
The above described parcels are shown on sheet A-2 attached herewith and by this reference
made a part hereof.
A-I
DRC2005-00086
~/I
I!XHllJlr 'A..t jP
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAlNTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B
STREET LIGHTING MAlNTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6
G
SITE
w
=>
Z
W
~
.
W
~,
<(
..-
-
Z
<(
<C
)-
Z
4:
U1 4 TII S7i'EET
<C
o
Z
<(
~
)0-
w
FRWY
(3
,
Sl1<ar tlGIITS
~EIT TftEI3S
~ EA.
~ cA.
Lh
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA '72 NORTH
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA /~~~&~~~~~_~f~}~
Exhibit B
To
Description of the District Improvements
Fiscal Year 2005/2006
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL):
Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (LMD #3B) represents landscape sites throughout the
Commercial/Industrial Maintenance District. These sites are associated with areas within that
district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed
to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are
charged to those parcels within that district.
The various landscape sites that are maintained by this district consist of median islands,
parkways, street trees, entry monuments, the landscaping within the Metrolink Station and 22,87
acres associated with the Adult Sports Park (not including the stadium, parking lots or the
maintenance building).
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I (ARTERIAL STREETS):
Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD #1) is used to fund the maintenance and/or
installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The
facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the
City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or
installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district.
The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on
arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City.
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.6 (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL):
Street Light Maintenance District No, 6 (SLD #6) is used to fund the maintenance and/or
installation of street lights and traffic signals located on commercial and industrial streets
throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally,
this area encompasses the industrial area of the City south of Foothill Boulevard. It has been
determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City.
The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on industrial or commercial streets and
traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on industrial or commercial streets generally south of
Foothill Boulevard.
B-l
DRC2005-00086
43
Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2005/2006)
For Project: DRC2005,00086
Number of Lamps
Street Lights 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,OOOL 27,500L
SLD# 1
SLD # 6 2
Community Trail Turf Non-Turf Trees
Landscaping DGSF SF SF EA
LMD # 3B 6
-Existing items installed with original project
Assessment Units by District
Parcel Acres
I 4.48
S 1
8.96
S6
4.48
, L3B
4.48
B-2
DRC2005-00086
,-/i(
Exhibit C
Proposed Annual Assessment
Fiscal Year 2005/2006
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 38 (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL):
The rate per assessment unit (A.D.) is $352.80 for the fiscal year 2005/06.
summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance
(Commercial/Industrial):
The following table
District No. 3B
Land Use
Physical
Unit Type
# of
Physical
Units
Assessment
Units Factor
# of
Assessment
Units
Rate Per
Assessment
Unit
Revenue
Comm/Ind
Acre
2186.85
1.0
2186.85
$352.80
$771,520.68
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (DRC2005-00086) is:
4.50 Acres xl A.U. Factor x $352.80 Rate Per AU. = $1,587.60 Annual Assessment
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 (ARTERIAL STREETS):
The rate per assessment unit (AU.) is $17,77 for the fiscal year 2005/06. The following table
summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No, 1 (Arterial Streets):
# of # of Rate Per
Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue
Single Parcel 21,151 1.00 21,151 $17.77 $375,853.27
Family
Multi- Unit 8,540 1.00 8,540 $17.77 $151,755.80
Family
Commercial Acre 2,380.36 2.00 4,760.72 $17.77 $84,597.99
TOTAL $612,207.06
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (DRC2005-00086) is:
4.50 Acres x 2 AU. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per AU. = $159.93 Annual Assessment
C-l
DRC2005-00086
45
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.6 (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRlAL):
The rate per assessment unit (A.D.) is $51.40 for the Fiscal Year 2005/06. The following table
summanzes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 6
(Commercial/Industrial) :
#of # of Rate Per
Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue
Comm/Ind Acre 2,065.67 1.00 2,090.72 $51.40 $107,463.01
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (DRC2005-00086) is:
4.50 Acres x 1 A.U. Factor x $51.40 Rate Per A.U. = $231.30 Annual Assessment
C-2
DRC2005-00086
LIfo
STAFF REpORT
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Date: March 1, 2006
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
From: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
By: Willie Val buena, Assistant Engineer
Subject: APPROVAL OF MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES,
MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR PARCEL MAP 17063, LOCATED AT
9359 FERON BOULEVARD, EAST OF HELLMAN AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY WF
CONSTRUCTION INC.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Parcel Map 17063,
accepting the subject agreement, securities and monumentation cash deposit, ordering the annexation
to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 and
authorizing the Mayor to sign said agreement and the City Clerk to cause said map to record.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Tentative Parcel Map 17063, located at 9359 Feron Boulevard, east of Hellman Avenue, within the
General Industrial District (Subarea 3), was ~pproved by the Planning Commission on October 26, 2005.
This project is for a subdivision of 2 parcels on 1.27 acres of land.
The Developer, WF Construction Inc., is submitting an agreement, securities and monumentation cash
deposit to guarantee the constnuction of the public improvements in the following amounts:
\
Faithful Performance Cash Bond
Labor and Material Cash Bond
Monumentation Cash Deposit
$
$
$
8,600.00
4,300.00
2,500.00
Copies of the agreement and securities are available in the City Clerk's Office.
The Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms signed by the Developer are on file in the City Clerk's
Office.
Respectfully submitted,
cfCiec;t/ Le~L
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJOWV:pjb
Attachment( s)
41
< ,PROJEct"
SITE '
',;
~:-
<
"
,:
~>
"
.'.iO
,~{ t.}; .:
.1'
.;:-X1".,_.
p:.<.ii!".
"'
~:
.'
r."
~~
,"
,-'-:C",
0" -"'",. ".
,~,:1:~~~:~~ ";->j.""'t1~. 't '-'!<Ii 'i..:f,~ ..,.} . ,~
"
..... '."'~" ......,.." ",...-:. ".,
BlH ST
.~;.
-.~ .
}.l
!t'
<<.
1
,
-',f
-. ~ ' .
,
A
N
CITY OF
ITEM:~l Hit? l'1d6,l.
TITlLE: V ICINI7i/ MJitP
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Lf~
RESOLUTION NO, ora -CJ$h
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
PARCEL MAP NO, 17063, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT,
IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND MONUMENTATION
CASH DEPOSIT
WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map 17063, submitted by WF Construction Inc. and
consisting of a subdivision of 1,27 acres of land into 2 parcels, located at 9359 Feron Boulevard,
east of Hellman Avenue, in the General Industrial District (Subarea 3), was approved by the
Planning Commission ofthe City of Rancho Cucamonga on October 26,2005; and
WHEREAS, Parcel Map No. 17063 is the final map of the division of land approved as
shown on the Tentative Parcel Map; and
WHEREAS, all the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map
by the City Council of said City have now been met by posting the Improvement Securities and
Monumentation Cash Deposit by WF Construction Inc., as developer.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement, Improvement
Securities and Monwnentation Cash Deposit submitted by said developer be and the same are
herby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on
behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and that said Parcel Map No. 17063 be and the same is
hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to
be filed for record,
L-J1
RESOLUTION NO. oh-tJ51
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE
ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHT
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS, 1 AND 6 FOR PARCEL
MAP 17063
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has
previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and
Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State
of California (the "72 Act"), said Landscape Maintenance District 3B, Street Lighting
Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (referred to
collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and
WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the 72 Act authorize the
annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and
WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of
resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority
protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owner of property within
the territory to be alU1exed; and
WHEREAS, notwithstanding the such provisions of the 72 Act related to the annexation
of territory to the Maintenance District, Article xmD of the Constitution of the State of
California ("Article XIIID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to
levy assessments which apply to the levy of alU1ual assessments for the maintenance Districts on
the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and
WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the
"Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual
assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto
(the "Improvements"); and
WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly
executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A
Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the
"Consent and Waiver"); and
WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have
expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 72 Act to the
annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the
annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and
..s6
WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also
expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 72 Act and/or
Article xmD applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the
Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and
have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed
annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; arid
WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory
to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory
in amount snot to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B hereto,
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I:
The above recitals are all true and correct
SECTION 2:
This City Council hereby finds and determines that:
a, The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not
exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such
parcel from the Improvements.
b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the
Improvements has been determine in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the
maintenance of the Improvements.
c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed
annual assessments.
SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the
Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from
the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders
the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set
forth in Exhibit B.
SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including levy of all
assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory,
2
PM 17063 5/
Exhibit A
Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property
To Be Annexed
The Owners of the Property are:
WF Construction, Inc.
The legal description of the Property is:
PARCEL 11 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 4320, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER PLAT RECORDED
IN BOOK 41 OF PARCEL MAPS, PAGE 81, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY.
The above described parcels are shown on sheet A-2 attached herewith and by this reference
made a part hereof
A-I
PM 17063 S 2
EXIhJJIT 'A"';"
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LaNDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 38
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6
HI"
"
"
.',"
, .
....u
/;~
." . ~ .
.~\ ;,~~:
.'.
..
"
t .
::,
~~
. ".,
.... "0;:"
, ;y~V
. '.,~.:)o
.
ti6^ :r,...""T: ~,...' '.'.:' .,':~
-rT\ VQ(;;y .~.... - ," _"
, ;' r ~." ; ,~4J.:/r ;j}it~
. .. \ '.
." :~'~.: ,(!'>~~1
'.
'. "<~~
f,- .
.:'.StlE
"'!
'f.;i
.\'"
,.
"f.;
, .. i; '.~: .
"
""
. ,'-~ .;:!, .
i.n.~t
. '
.'
.'
.; -<., ,
1"
".'.-' .
.>:~~-:-';,:
'~.-'.'''''_-I-'....
.'>
~.' r
:,~,:;" ..
y' ~
".'.
.i" .
'.
.>
~ ..'
~~.'..)..~~~ "/'.~~'-~':~"""hl..t ~ ,.....; - .
. ...'
, .
..",....f~W'.. ".':-'" ,:.
>:;" .~. -",: -~~. . . .
. .
"
, ~~~~~-,~~ ~;~
81H ST.
.>
'..
/
w
<,
.'
, ,
., .,
STIer lftll'S
9t"A.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
A
S 3 NORTII
;jtdltJri, fvtoltl;7~j
Exhibit B
To
Description of the District Improvements
Fiscal Year 2005/2006
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL):
Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (LMD #3B) represents landscape sites throughout the
Commercial/Industrial Maintenance District. These sites are associated with areas within that
district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed
to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are
charged to those parcels within that district.
The various landscape sites that are maintained by this district consist of median islands,
parkways, street trees, entry monuments, the landscaping within the Metrolink Station and 22.87
acres associated with the Adult Sports Park (not including the stadium, parking lots or the
maintenance building),
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 (ARTERIAL STREETS):
Street Light Maintenance District No, 1 (SLD #1) is used to fund the maintenance and/or
installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The
facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the
City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or
installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district.
The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on
arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City.
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.6 (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL):
Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (SLD #6) is used to fund the maintenance and/or
installation of street lights and traffic signals located on commercial and industrial streets
throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally,
this area encompasses the industrial area of the City south of Foothill Boulevard. It has been
determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City.
The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on industrial or commercial streets and
traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on industrial or commercial streets generally south of
Foothill Boulevard.
B-1
PM 17063 5 t/
Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2005/2006)
For Project: SUBTPM 17063
Number of Lamps
Street Lights 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L
SLD# I
SLD # 6 1-
Community Trail Turf Non-Turf Trees
Landscaping DGSF SF SF EA
LMD # 3B 9
-Existing items installed with original project (to be relocated)
Assessment Units by District
Parcel Acres
I 0.61
2 0.64
S I
1.22
1.28
S6
0.61
0.64
L3B
0.61
0,64
B-2
PM 17063
55
Exbibit C
Proposed Annual Assessment
Fiscal Year 200512006
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL):
The rate per assessment unit (AU.) is $352,80 for the fiscal year 2005/06,
summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance
(Commercial/Industrial) :
The following table
District No. 38
Land Use
Physical
Unit Type
# of
Physical
Units
CommlInd
Acre
2186.85
# of Rate Per
Assessment Assessment Assessment
Units Factor Units Unit Revenue
1.0 2186.85 $352.80 $771,520.68
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (PM 17063) is:
Parcell - 0.61 Acres x I AU. Factor x $352.80 Rate Per AU. = $215.21 Annual Assessment
Parcel 2 - 0.64 Acres x I AU. Factor x $352.80 Rate Per A.U. = $225.79 Annual Assessment
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I (ARTERIAL STREETS):
The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2005/06. The following table
summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. I (Arterial Streets):
#of # of Rate Per
Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue
Single Parcel 21,151 1.00 21,151 $17.77 $375,853.27
Family
Multi- Unit 8,540 1.00 8,540 $17.77 $151,755.80
Family
Commercial Acre 2,380.36 2.00 4,760.72 $17.77 $84,597.99
TOTAL $612,207.06
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (PM 17063) is:
Parcell - 0,61 Acres x 2 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per AU. = $21.68 Annual Assessment
Parcel 2 - 0.64 Acres x 2 AU. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $22.75 Annual Assessment
C-l
PM 17063 5 h
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.6 (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL):
The rate per assessment unit (AU.) is $51.40 for the Fiscal Year 2005/06. The following table
summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No, 6
(Commerci alllndustrial):
#of # of Rate Per
Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue
Comm/Ind Acre 2,065.67 1.00 2,090.72 $51.40 $107,463.01
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (PM 17063) is:
Parcel 1- 0.61 Acres x 1 AU. Factor x $51.40 Rate Per A.U. = $31.35 Annual Assessment
Parcel 2 - 0.64 Acres xl A.U. Factor x $51.40 Rate Per AU, = $32.90 Annual Assessment
C-2
PM 17063 S 7
Date:
March 1, 2006
STAFF REpORT
ENGINEERlNG DEPARTMENT
To:
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP. City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer
From:
By:
Subject:
APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES
FOR PARCEL MAP 17303, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 4TH STREET
AND HAVEN A VENUE, SUBMITTED BY TPRF/THC HA VENPARK LLC
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject agreement and
securities and authorizing the Mayor to sign said agreement.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Tentative Parcel Map 17303, located at the northwest comer of 4th Street and Haven Avenue, in the General
Industrial District (Subarea 3), was approved by the Planning Commission on October 26, 2005. This project
is for the subdivision of 1.27 acres of land into 2 parcels,
The Developer, TPRF/THC Havenpark LLC, is submitting an agreement and securities to guarantee the
construction of the public storm drain improvements in the following amounts:
Faithful Performance Bond
Labor and Material Bond
$
$
123,900.00
61,950.00
Copies of the agreement and securities are available in the City Clerk's Office.
Respectfully submitted,
~'f(>? ~C ci./
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:WV:pjb
Attachment(s)
5~
,~~,q.,
,";
j
'-'."
....~t'::...:~.\~.....
",',,%'..,'
la'
"'11
,.,.;,,"
......
,j,'
:'~.
'-:.:f<'.-'..
."'.:;::.
!
"'."1i,,'
Ii,
,.'.
; .",.
.. . ....
. . - '-
i'.~'"
..........
i~
1 "
'l/i.
i,:ittt$t,..."";,,, ',,~.::,';:,.,. ..",_,;,
,.:..,: ~i:''''''''.'<''''~"-~,,,,,, :. .,.,.. .,",..
I'/.b
,,'.',' ,,', '." {If
. . , "','::: .: ..,'.,,},.,.'."..'
",.."'.','..~:,,0,
;..;~~.,."......./..:,<,r
<.;:~;,;;q.;".""".:..
",."".: .......:..;....'
.)~B'-i':t..,,:,. ...,.. '". .'..,.
i';.'..'..:.:;~~.
Sl.,.~,..,"',..,.
''''.J::::.: '.
....,' -';":'.: ~ .. . ." .;.;.....-'", .
..',' , ...:...,. ..i.;W~i-ii~.'?:\::;~9+~1+..!~14~K:
. -" ". .: .. "- .' ~ :-." '. ~" .: ~..""
..-:...;,"::.......... .....
: ':.~. ".': :
'. " .... ::.~ ::.
::. '. .~ ":':'.,-~~';- .'
.......;.
..... .....
,IT
,,:~,:,j~..,,;,
',.,,',,".,,'.~1,.,.,,',',,", ""
',..],:,:,' ,,'
"," 1-. . .
"-"".:. -~, -'.' .
.Jf.".'
'".:f".:_:.., :.:,.-.t,~"...'.'-:: . ;:.:~_~<\
, ....:-~:;~.,
'%~ii~$~1
- ..co' .'~.;.
..:...-.
.}\-:;i~::;
....,.....
,". ,-".~ ':;
':.'~"
: -~.'
,.....
":"
.'....~~,ir".
','. ._'-.,
:.....
..;.
.. .T.
. ~ t,
: :~.?J:'"
.. :'1..
..:..;.
,.;J~!t!..!t;,.4,i.;r.l".'~:.:
'. '.. ~. ' '-:: it;:
, . .,..',.,., '..f~...>...lt
. ',.",... ..,...',...,.. ,/1 . -. .' . "It)! .' . .
. .,...,',.,'/ k~.;;J;;...~_l&A'I~'?fit . ' _
;..::.':.::...:':::::.::.::~.:. .::.:.::.~: ~~~"!.;~'~~,~,~ J>>!.::~~. ':,~~::ll~..._""
':'-'.".:'.:. ...~...~~..._:...:~)::,.~",~i,',',,:. . "'r '. '$:-', ,-' -:'~f"':c.'~;'''1:;--:'J';":::
:.-:t-..-....,....
"':'
......
.............
..-:"......
.....
.",'.
,'.,'..t)
'-. ,::-:.;: n'
"- .. '.
'- ,.-......
:-::_>-::-:':'.;'.:.-:
"'. ....-_.
.... ',,-
. .' ..;~.
..:
: ~'..",
.,.'
-.....
'...
......
'.<.,.
;'.',
':.;:
.,....
......-.
.....::.:.,.:....
.:!.:'
.......-.....
. ~.~.
.....
....,.
'..---.-'.--'..
...........
......
'::::;:.:.,:.
.'-'
,.;."...
.'.....
,'--"'.
','..:.::..
...,.'.-.
.....
-: ~.'
.-.......;..-...<
........
,
A-
N
ITEM:~~/~
TiTLE: ,\tIC/Nay ~
C][TY 0 JF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ENGINEERING DIVISION
$1
RESOLUTION NO. () & - d 5 2?
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITIES FOR PARCEL MAP 17303
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its
consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on March 1, 2006, by TPRF/THC
Havenpark, LLC., as Developer, for the public storm drain improvements adjacent to the real
property specifically described therein, and generally located at the northwest corner of 4th Street
and Haven Avenue; and
WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and
sufficient Improvement Securities, which are identified in said Improvement Agreement
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES, as follows:
I. That said Improvement Agreement, be and the same is approved and the Mayor
is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is
authorized to attest thereto; and
2. That said Improvement Securities are accepted as good and sufficient, subject
to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney.
00
March 1, 2006
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Maria Perez, Associate Engineer ~r
Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Technician ~
STAFF REpORT
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Date:
To:
From:
By:
Subject:
ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED AND AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION
OF THE CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $98,741.00 TO THE APPARENT LOW
BIDDER, INTERNATIONAL PAVEMENT SOLUTIONS, AND AUTHORIZE THE
EXPENDITURE OF A 10% CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $9,874.10 FOR THE
ADA 2005/2006 ACCESS RAMP AND DRIVE APPROACH IMPROVEMENTS AT
VARIOUS LOCATIONS, TO BE FUNDED FROM MEASURE I FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO.
11763035650/1150176-0 AND APPROPRIATE AN ADDITIONAL AMOUNT OF
$20,000.00 TO ACCOUNT NO, 11763035650/1150176-0 FROM MEASURE I FUND
BALANCE
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council accept the bids received and award and authorize the
execution of the contract in the amount of $98,741.00 to the apparent low bidder, International
Pavement Solutions, and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of
$9,874.10, for the ADA 2005/2006 Access Ramp and Drive Approach Improvements at Various
Locations, to be funded from Measure I funds. Account No. 11763035650/1150176-0 and
appropriate an additional amount of $20,000.00 to Account No. 11763035650/1150176-0'from
Measure I fund balance,
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on February 14, 2006, for the
subject project. The Engineer's estimate was $90,728.00. Staff has reviewed all bids received and
found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements with any irregularities to be
inconsequential. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds all bidders
meet the requirements of the bid documents.
The ADA 2005/2006 Access Ramp and Drive Approach Improvements at Various Locations scope
of work consists of saw cutting and removals, construction of access ramps, sidewalks and
rockscape, and the replacement of asphalt concrete. The contract documents call for twenty (20)
working days to complete this construction.
Respectfully submitted,
i'~t~lliL.~{
Willia,;;/j" O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:MP/RO:ls
Attachments
to/
III 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
II " 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0'" I- 0 0 0 0 N '" .,; 0 0 0 0 u-i 0 0 ..;
:; ti ~ 0 - 0 '" on '" '" '" '" 0 '" '" 0 0 ..
0, 0 "'. ...., .... "', "'. "'. '" 0 '" '" 0 on ~
::I '" 0 ci c-i '" c-i '" ",' "' ....'
- ~:; 0 '" '" '" ,.., - ..
- - '" - '" - - - '" '" '" '" '"
00" '" '" '" '" '" '" ...
~ ClJu
..
II -
E: .. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
" a 0 0 0 0 0 0 " 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
" I- 0 0 0 0 N '" '" 0 0 0 0 u-i 0 0 oj
Q .. z 0 - 0 '" on '" '" '" '" 0 '" '" 0 0 '"
"' :>" " 0, 0 "', .... ..... "', "', "!. '" O. '" "'. 0 on. ....
.... 01 - 0 0 ci '" ",' '" '" - - '" '" '" '" "' t- oo'
~ Il. ":; - - '" - '" - - - '" '" '" '" '"
'" - " '" '" '" '" '" '" '"
~ ~
"-
" 0
.~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
.. 0 " 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
III 0 on 0 '" oj '" oj oj 0 0 u-i u-i 0 0
e I- I-
-~ 0 '" 0 '" '" '" '" '" '" - - - 0 0
.. Z 0 0 '" <J> '" '" '" '" 0 on,
.. "U ci '" v,- ....
II - '" '"
... '"
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
ti " 0 0 0 0 " 0 " 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
I- 0 0 0 0 .,; '" 0 on 0 0 .,; '" 0 0 oj
Z 0 0 0 on '" .... '" '" '" 0 - on 0 0 '"
0 "" 0. '" "'. '" O. "' '" "', '" "'. '" '" on 0 ....
(Jr.:I -0 M "' '" '" '" '" i, ci
":; on - '" '" '" '" '"
CIJ~ '" '" '" - '" - - - '" '" '"
" '" '" '" '" '"
~:ol
r.:Il= 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 " 0 " " 0 " 0 " 0 0 " 0
l!::CIJ 0 0 0 0 '" .... 0 - 0 - '" '" 0 0
8 ~!:t;j 0 on 0 - '" '" - - '" - '" '" 0 0
fie ~8 0 - '" '" '" '" '" '" '" on 0.
on' '" '" '" '"
r.:I '" '"
..l
.... "
OJ
'" '5 0
.... I-
= tii
Q,l >
0
8 E
"" Q,l l!!
<:> >
<:> 0 '0 E
.... c U
.. '" <( Ql
.;- S' 0> 0> 0> ~
... .>; c " (/)
~ ... u; '" '" Iii
::> 0> 00
-= 'x U 0> ,>; 'x
Ql ;, 0> " '"
'" " ~ u; Ql C
'5 '"
~ OJ ~ ,.., 'x '0 .~
'" 'x
~ Q ~ 'x Ql Ql rn (/)
= .. 13 Ql 0> - '5 >
Co 0 .~ '5 " 0 0 13
!: Co '" E +0 ~ E
.0 00 rn .~
-< = l!! 5 rn 'x > 0 l!! Ql
" 0 '0 U > Ql 0 E 0.
Q,l .- 0 E '0
Z .... c E '5 l!! c '"
.. OJ '" 0> l!! '" u
Z .;:; c l!! ~ '"
'" 0> '0' '0 III 'E
Q c 13 c
r"'I Q '" 'm 13 0 '" .0 <( '"
~ ..:i 1ii .>; E .~ 5 I
"" ::> III <.i
0 '" u a: l!! 0. <( U '0 0>
= ;, .c .c E .c c
Q = '0 U u <.i .c 13 H c '5.
OJ 0 '" c '" '" 13 &. 00 '"
... '" e 0 '" .s is '':;
Co .- '" .>; "
= 8 :; 13 0. 0. Ci ~ 13 Ci .& :> 0. ii5
~ .~ E 0. 0. ~ 'm .~ en '" ""
OJ > <( <( rn .c U OJ u u
0 '" 00
!:l:: C' a: " " ;, u E u Cl U '0 e
~ Z "
0 c " > ." a; '0 0.. 0.. C C'
~ 0 E 00 '':; 0 '0 " 00 Ql '"
., r: 00 0 en " u 00 U 0. oJ 0
., ~ " 8 g .c '" 0 '" ()
.. .. > u u () 3: 0. 2 U 2 u l!!
'" .. ~ '" () () () en 1;; 1;; ~ 0 u
:s '" u :0 0.. <(+0 0.. 0.. 0.. () () " () c u u; iE
-< ~ 0 u u .~ () u i"
'" 0 () 0 0 "
:s \0 " ::;; <( <( 1ij '" 10 :,,- 0.. 0.. () 0.. () a: a: I-
;;; Q
'" Q I- Z is "- "- "-
Q '" Z '" 0 "- "- "- "- "- "- '" '"
..l OJ '" OJ OJ OJ ..l '" OJ OJ ..l ..l
... ~ " I- ....
= lrl
Q
Q > - '" 00 ~ ". '" N ~ :": 0 ". M ,.., ,..,
'" l- N ~ ". ~ ~ 00 0 N M
:::: M !::: :! :! N ".
-<
~ 0 ..: N M .. ~ '" ,..: 00 0'. 0' ,.., N ::: ..
Z - ,.., ,..,
~
"
bJJ
cd
Il.
&1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 III 0 0 .,. "' 0 0 0 0 0 0 .,.
Ii ... 0 0 0 r-: '" 0 <i N <i 0 0 0 0 0 <i
= " 0 N '" 0 '" .... '" .... '" 0 '" '" 0 0 '"
"' 0 - '" Ill, "', ". N, "', '" .... ~ "!. "', 0_ -
.... 0 N' M '" M '" ",' ....
'" ". N .... '" - '"
:: ~ :;; '" '" N '" - - N '" '" '" '" -
., '" '" '" '" -
.lIl = '"
.. .~
If ..
.. 0 0 0 0 III 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
.. 0 0 0 III .... "' N III 0. '" 0 0 0 0
. = 0 0 0 00 N 00 00 0 0 0 0
U) 'g !: ... .... ". <Xl
YO 0 N - - - '" '" - N - N N 0 0
= " 0 0. - - '" '" '" '" '" '" '" "'- 0_
r.l"' w N '" '" - '"
'" '" '"
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
= ... 0 0 0 en 0 <ci N 0 0 0 00 en 0 0 <ci
0 " 0 0 0 ". ". '" .... N 0 0 '" '" 0 0 '"
.~ ~ Ill, '" "'- III ". N '" '" '" '" '" ". III 0 '"
... 0 '" M - ....' ",- U; ",' ....- '" ",' '" ",' ",- U; U;
U :;; '" '" '" y; '" - '" - '" '" '" '" 0
e ., '" '" '" -
'"
...
..
= 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0. 0 III 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 t:!n 0 0 0 - 0 00 <ci '" 0 '" '" en 0 0
0 III 0 - - '" - - III - - - 0 0
U) "0 III - '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" ." 0
roo "'w ",' '" '" g U;
'" '"
Ii 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.
= ... 0 0 0 O' '" <ci 0 0 0 0 0 <Xi 0 0 '"
.... " 0 0 0 III III .... '" '" ". 0 '" '" 0 0 '"
"' 0 III 0, '" ....- .... "', '" '" .,. .,. Ill, 0 0. "'-
.. 0 ",' .,; '" Ill' '" <5 '" ....' '" ",' '" '" N '" -
.. :;;
.. - '" '" - '" - '" - '" '" '" '" 0
.l:l ., '" '" '" '" '" y;
...
e 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
III 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
b~ ... 0 0 0 0 <Xi .0 en N en '" 0 .0 0 0
YO 0 III III - '" '" - - - - '" '" 0 0
0 0 '" IA '" '" '" '" '" '" 0_ 0,
="' ,W ",- '" '" '"
.. y; '" '"
Cl
.... ...
.,
.. ...
'" '0 0
.... ...
= iii
.. >
0
5 E
'" '" ~
c .. '0
C <:> E
.... c: 0
... '" <{ '"
.,; Q., 0> 0> 0> ~
.... 5 .S c: .S en
~ .. Vi E Vi ~
" 0>
..c 'x " 0> .E 'x '"
'" ~ 0> .S 32
'" :E Vi '" c:
'0 '" Vi -
;:; .. '" '" 'x 'x 0 .8.
C<: <:> ~ .~ Q)
... U 0> Q) '0 ~ en
~ Q., .S '0 c '0
"' ~ '" E '" ~ E u
r.. = ~ -e iii '" iii .S
"' 'x > 0 ~ Q)
'" <:> > Q) 0
.. .- '0 U 0 - E E '0 0.
Z .... c E ~ c ~
.. '" 0> 0 ~
z .- .. c: ~ ~ '" '"
... '" 0> '" '0 lD
Q <:> :S u c: '0
"' '0; u 0 '" .0 <( ro
i>< -< :5 1;) .S E .S :; I
"0 lD U
0 '" " ~ ~ 0. <( U '0 0>
= ~ .r::: .r::: E .r::: c:
Q .. = '" '0 " " U .r::: u B c: '0.
<:> c: '" '" u '" '" '"
.... '" 0 e ~ '" .S is 'C:
~ Co .- '" c. .S Ci Q) Iii
5 ; U 0. 0. ~ u .& :> 0.
C<: ,S E 0. 0. -'" '0; .S en '" ""
.. ;;. <( <{ l .r::: :5 "
0 8! e u u '"
r.. ~ " 1'" '" Q) 0 U (9 U '0 e
0 c Q) > > '0 di '0 a. ~ a. c: 1'"
;.- 0 E '" ;5 ;5 c: '" '"
'" i: ~ '" Ci5 '" '" 13 l'J 13 0. -' 0
~ '" " Q) Q) .r::: 0. '" U
'" > g g U U U :;: 2 U 2 " Q)
'" " '" U U U (f) Vi Vi '" 0 "
'" w :c a. <('" -'" '"
:;; YO U .~ a. a. a. 0 0 c 0 c " Vi
< '" 0 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q) '"
~ ;e Q :;: <( <( ~ 0, <0 ... a. a. u a. 0 ~ ~ .=
;:; Q
'" Q !: '" Z Z "' "' "' "' "' "' "'
Q M " 0 0 "' "' '" '"
-' '" '" '" '" '" -' '" '" '" ..J -'
.... -.. ~ f- f-
~ Vl
Q
Q >- - '" 00 ~ ... '" N ~ '" 0 ... '" -
M I;: N '" ... '" '" 00 - 0 N '"
~ '" .... :! :! N ...
< - -
Q 0 - N '" " V; '" ,.: 00 " 0 :: N '" :i.
< " - -
'"
"
OJ)
<II
0..
03
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
.. 0 0 0 N <i ~ <i U; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
>; 0 0 0 00 '" ~ t- '" 0 0 '" '" 0 0 0
.; " 0 ~ 0, 00 O. "' t-, N 00 "', '" '" 0 "< N
0 vi t- '" "," '" .: ~ vi V> '" V> '" ",' '" '"
1'1 " ., ., ., N ., ~ '" N ., ., V> ., '"
- <: ., '" V> V> ~
.,
~ 0 0 0 0 0 "' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Q 0 0 0 '" c: t- o 0 c: 0 c: 0 0 0
":i :~ 0 0 0 u; '" '" .; ...: 0 ...: '" 0 0 0
0 0 0 ~ ., V> N ~ '" ~ ~ ~ 0 0
>;0 0 '" '" V> V> ., V> ., V> V> 0 "<
"u vi V> V> ",' '"
V> V> .,
or 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cl .. 0 0 0 0 0 N <i 0 oD 0 0 oj oj 0 0
.~ >; 0 '" '" "' '" t- '" '" "' 0 '" N t- o 0
i: " ":. 00 "', '" "'. "< "', t-. N 0 '" '" '" 0 0
.. 0 '" -0 N ",. '" N ~ '" ., ",. V> <'i' ",' on ",.
fI.I " V> V> ., ~ ., ~ ~ N V> ~ V> ., ~
<: V> '" V> V> V> ~
..... .; .,
as
Cl 1'1
.g - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c: 0 0
III .... 0 u; 0 0 0 ...: .; ~ <i u; u; ~ oj 0
-~ 0 '" '" ~ ~ ., V> ~ N ~ '" t- o
.. >;0 "', N '" V> V> ., V> V> V> '" '" o.
..... "u '" ., ., on '"
:= ., ., V>
Iil
.... -'
..,
<'<I ..
'" '0 0
.... ..
= ~
.. 0
S E
~ .. ~
<:> > 'Q
<:> 0 E
N C U
... '" <( "
.,f e- '" '" '" ~
- .E c
;; E .E <n
~ .... 00 '" ;; to
-= 'x u '" c 'x
" ;< '" .E ~ " :;;:
'" '0 '" .E ;; c
~ <'<I '" ;; 'x '0 .ts.
0 (ij 'x 'x "
.. u " (ij <n
~ > " '" '0 >
c.. 0 .E '0 .E '0
r: E 0 U
c.. '" .0 ;; ~ (ij E .E
-( = ~ 5 ~ 'x > ~
" 0 " Q Q "
.. 'C 'Q () 0 E E 'Q C.
Z > c '" E '0 ~ c ~
<'<I '" ~
- .- c " ~ '" '"
Z .. '" '" 'c ~ 'Q '" 'E
~ ~ 0 c 'n; U c -e
'""' .. u 0 .E '" <i. '"
=- 't:I S 1il .E ~ 1Il .00 d I
0 '" u a: .c c. <i. U 'Q '"
= ;< .c E .c c
= " U .c c
Q <'<I '" 'Q '" '" '" d '" u j,l '" 'i'i
- 0 '" c e e u a: '" .E is 'C
~ c.. .- '" .E a. " ii5
S :; u c. c. c. ~ u $ > c.
~ .E E c. c. -'" 'n; .E <n '" oil
<'<I> <( <( (ij .c S "
0 E '" ~ () ~ () () '" e
'" ~ >; a: " " U (9 () 'Q
0 C " > > Q; 'Q a. a. c E
E '" ~ ~ 'Q '" " .5
~ '" ;:: Q '" en " c 13 13 13 c. Q
'" 1U !! 8 g .c '" '" u
.. .. () () () 5: c. 2 U 00 u "
'" " &! '" u u () <n ;; ~ '" :s u
~ '" u :c a. <(.. () U U '" -'" ;; if'
-( '" t> .~ a. a. a. c c u
'" Q () . () () Q () Q Q " '"
~ \Cl C ::;; <( <( iij '" <0 .. a. a. U a. U a: a: .=
;:; 0
rn 0 .. Z Z
Q '" Z on 0 0 "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" on '"
.... on on on '" on .... '" '" '" .... ....
- ~ " .... ....
~ II)
0
0 ,. - '" '" '" '" '" N '" :;: 0 '" '" - -
'" I~ N ~ '" ~ ~ '" 0 N '"
~ '" ,... :': :': N '"
-( -
~ 0 - N cO .. ".; "" '" 00 '" '" - N cO '"
-( >; - - - -
r')
Q)
bJl
oj
a.
hLJ
VICINITY MAP
ADA 2005/2006 ACCESS RAMP IMPROVEMENTS
AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS
- ';..+:-
-~-,\..
Base Lirie.RlJ.'~ , '
. ,~";tt
Foothiji~I.-t.~) ,.
jW-::,:" '" "t" ~ .~--u
. _...-:.~ ,~li;" ~.~.:i.CJ ;:.'r .
Arrow Rtc .-:' , . " . .
;:::._ WII" "'l...r -,-. 1
, 8th~SL
10 Freeway ~, -,~t\'i~
........... '<<'8",", st,"c' ::;
.._",-,-
..... ~t:='~ir
"o"4=-~ rL, .-
, . ,-,,::,=:;-~ = . ' . 4th St
ell "..I::",... '->' " . , ~\ .~'.... '
<~;1IllJ >- C ClIo..."............ ':>1: .:;
"iii cc ',_~"~."..~'< ....
~~'-i~i ~i"-;]-1!" ~ i=a....1O F~ewi\Y
'iiii~,~ 1 .!
::c oi ::c:Z: 'Ii I m
!
PRO.JECT
LOCATION
......-..
-
..~ . VI
..~
,
~~~ " '<G-,~-'''\.
'i .
'.
l m~",\\ ~;':$f;
ill LtJ. 1ll >-( .:~
i /--<r' .:1'1 ~;':.;
~T'
gJ
- .....-,
~ ~.
~., ,,<~',
.! i ~~
i -'
u:<:.r-Y
"": 'Wilson Av
f I
r Route 30
I Highland Av
--:-1 I I
',,,,,,0,' ! LJ
't~~f
Ir~B~~~
I.Arrow Rt
I, '~
I
~
&,5
Date:
March I, 2006
STAFF REpORT
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
To:
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Maager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Betty Miller, Associate Engineer
From:
By:
Subject:
APPROVAL OF A MASTER PLAN TRANSPORTATION FACILITY REIMBURSEMENT
AGREEMENT, SRA-29, IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF TRACTS
15711-1, 15711,2 AND 15711, LOCATED ON BOTH SIDES OF MILLER AVENUE
BETWEEN ETIWANDA AND EAST AVENUES, SUBMITTED BY PACIFIC
COMMUNITIES, TO BE FUNDED FROM TRANSPORTATION REIMBURSEMENT
ACCOUNT NUMBER 11243035650/1026124-0
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the Reimbursement
Agreement for Transportation Backbone improvements (reconstruction of middle 38 feet) in Etiwanda and
Miller Avenues, in conjunction with the development of Tracts 15711-1, 15711-2 and 15711, and authorizing
the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
As a condition of approval of Tentative Tract 15711, Pacific Communities, the Developer, was required to
reconstruct the middle 38 feet of pavement in Miller A venue, from Etiwanda A venue to East A venue, and in
Etiwanda Avenue, from Miller Avenue to Foothill Boulevard, The Developer has completed these
improvements.
Whenever a developer is required, as a condition of approval of a development permit, to construct a public
facility that is determined by the City to have supplemental size, length or capacity over what is needed for
the impacts of that development, and when such construction is necessary to ensure efficient and timely
construction of the facilities network, a reimbursement agreement with the developer and a credit against the
Transportation Development Fee shall be offered.
The Developer has submitted an itemized accounting of the construction costs for the required street
improvements. Staff has reviewed and concurs with the submittal. The total cost of said improvements was
$589,619.08. Transportation Fee Credits that were given totaled $475,393.90, leaving a balance of
$114,225.18 to be reimbursed from the City Transportation Reimbursement Account Number
1124303565011026124,0.
Respectfully Submitted,
lilt t/ LL.C'(
William J. O'Neil
Ci ty Engineer
WJO:BM:pjb
Attachments
&~
Vicinity Map
/1 /=1~LI_Ll~~ ' II
LL.ltrrrnIDlJ II WJ WlJMILLERAVE n
------ -------------
,
.
I
,
I
,
I
I
~I
0'
~I
w,
: 38' BACKBONE
,
,
I
I
TlTTTI1
38' BACKBON
m
)>
en
-<
~
m
'.
FOOTHIL
RF:i /
N
W*"
TITLE: SRA-29
EXHIBIT: Vicinity Map
s
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ENGINEERING DIVISION
& 1 NTS
RESOLUTION NO. {)h -tJ,59
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A
MASTER PLAN TRANSPORTATION FACILITY
REThJBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE
RECONSTRUCTION OF BACKBONE PORTIONS (MIDDLE
38 FEET) OF MILLER AND ETIW ANDA AVENUES, SRA-29
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has for its
consideration a Master Plan Transportation Facility Reimbursement Agreement submitted by
Pacific Communities, the Developer, for off site improvements in conjunction with the
development of Tracts 15711-1, 15711-2 and 15711, located on both sides of Miller Avenue
between Etiwanda and East Avenues; and
WHEREAS, the Developer, at Developer's expense, has completed the required
improvements; and
WHEREAS, the Developer has requested reimbursement for the backbone (middle 38
feet) portion of the street improvements, as he is entitled per the conditions of approval for his
development, by means of said Reimbursement Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the Developer, at the time of building permit issuance, has received fee
credit from the Transportation Development Fees in the amounts stipulated in said
Reimbursement Agreement.
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES that said Reimbursement Agreement be and the same is
hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said agreement on behalf of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga and the City Clerk to attest thereto.
tg
THE CITY OF
~. I>>''''' Iii, ,;;""
RANCUO CUCAMONGA
StaffRepJrt
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
March 1, 2006
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
Kimberly S. Thomas, Management Analyst III, City Manager's Office
EXTENSION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH NON-PROFIT FOR THE
OPERATION OF TEMPORARY JOB CENTER
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council ratify and adopt a Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) with the non'profit Touch Compassionate Ministries to provide
temporary assistance at the site on Grove Avenue. This local non-profit is willing to
take over from the prior operator to extend service and enter into an agreement to
operate the facility and be responsible for the complete operation of the facility until the
end of the fiscal Year, June 30, 2006, or until the donated land lease is terminated.
The MOU defines the commitments of the City and Operator whereby the Operator shall
operate the Job Center and sets the obligations of the City and the non-profit Operator.
The terms and conditions of the prior agreement remain in force and the agreement has
been reviewed by the City Attorney's Office. As long as the agreement and land lease
remain, the Police Department continues to support the concept of a Job Center as a
community-based method that is in the interest of public safety. The current Fiscal Year
2005-06 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program funds the temporary
facility infrastructure, so that the General Fund is not impacted. This project does not
take funds from other funded public service programs. All staffing and daily operations
are provided by the non-profit.
CONCLUSION
As the non-profit organization is willing to assist and continue this community approach
at little or no cost to the City, Staff recommends that the City Council approve an
agreement for the temporary site.
Respectfully submitted,
~!~
Management Analyst III
lot(
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
['
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Staff Report
DAlE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
March 1, 2006
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Tasha Hunter, Public Service Tech I
APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR TRACT
14759-1, LOCATED AT WARDMAN BULLOCK ROAD AND WILSON AVENUE,
SUBMITTED BY PUL TE HOMES
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject
agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said
agreement.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public
improvements for Tract 14759-1 were approved by the City Council on November 3, 2004, in
the following amounts:
Faithful Performance Bond:
Labor and Material Bond:
$3,202,200.00
$1,601,100,00
Due to the size and length of the project, unexpected delays have occurred delaying the original
schedule. The developer, Pulte Homes, is requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said
improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the
City Clerk's office.
Respe;p' ti ely submitted, .;
( 1:{ ("t L~)/t
Willia J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:TCH
Attachments
70
PtlIJ~_@
-W We66@
January 31,2006
Joseph E. Stofa Jr.
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Project Engineer
Community Development Division - Engineering Department
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, California 92729,0807
RE: Extension of Rancho Summit - Tract 14759-1 Improvement Agreement
Per the request of the Engineering Department, Pulte Homes has prepared this letter to
formally request an extension on our Tract 14759-1 Improvement Agreements in Rancho
Summit. Due to the size and length of our project, we have experienced some delays in
our original schedule. Therefore, we would like to thank the city for their understanding
and assistance in the extension of our Improvement Agreement.
rJJ jJ!I ~
Best,
William Lu
Project Manager
951.218,5927 (Mobile)
Tllis message is intended lor the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged
and confidentiaL If you are the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this communication in error, please notifY the sender immediately by telephone and return the original message to us at
the above address via the US Postal Service. Thank you.
North Inland Empire Division
1351 Pomona Road, Suite 200
Corona, California 92882
951-271-5800 Phone
951-271-5860 Fax
71
....,
,
,
j
,<
l
,d
j' :f" , '
/ /' .
('
;>~~\?r
~~i~?' "j'~,
t:~ cc'lG ;:
u~ =__
[917
ENGINEER! NG DIVISION
VIC!NITY I\IAP
^
N
tit Ie;
CITY Or- RANCIIO CUCAI\IONGA
IT 1Lf-.7'5cr-{
TR 1!.j7CJ9. 2...
page
.L
RESOLUTION NO. ()~-06~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 14759-1
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. California, has
for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on March 1,
2006, by Pulte Homes, as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way
adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located At
Wardman Bullock Road and Wilson Avenue; and
WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said
Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction
with the development of said Tract 14759-1; and
WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and
accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security. which is identified in said
Improvernent Agreement Extension.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement Extension
and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor
is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto,
73
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
I - --1
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Staff Report
March 1, 2006
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J, O'Neil, City Engineer
Tasha Hunter. Public Service Tech I
APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR TRACT
14759-2. LOCATED EAST OF WARDMAN BULLOCK ROAD AND SOUTH OF
WILSON AVENUE,SUBMITTED BY PULTE HOMES -
RECOMMENDATION
DAlE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the SUbject
agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said
agreement.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Improvement Agreement and Improvernent Security to guarantee the construction of the public
improvements for Tract 14759-2 were approved by the City Council on November 3, 2004, in
the following amounts:
Faithful Performance Bond:
Labor and Material Bond:
$1,350,000.00
$ 675.000.00
Due to the size and length of the project, unexpected delays have occurred delaying the original
schedule. The developer, Pulte Homes, is requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said
improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the
City Clerk's office.
Respec;tively submitted,
) -; L '.c
,Jr;'( I .' ,/Zl ,., /
Willi~- J, O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:TCH
Attachments
7'-1
C~!}'\'~';.-.
....0.:..... ...._,
~~,~~\Ii2("j.'~,
t:~ ~16 ~
U~.~~.....
1~77
CITY Or- RANCIIO CUCAi\IONGA
ti tie;
ENGINEERING DIVISION
VICINITY 1\.1AP
^
N
T7?fLf-.7'5"l-1
TR 14759.2...
p<lge 7 S
RESOLUTION NO. I)t-j~/
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 14759-2
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has
for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on March 1,
2006, by Pulte Homes, as developer, for the improvement of public right,of-way
adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located East
of Ward man Bullock Road and south of Wilson Avenue; and
WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements. described in said
Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction
with the development of said Tract 14759-2; and
WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and
accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said
Irnprovement Agreement Extension.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement Extension
and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor
is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto.
7~
~dt~",
7ftA Wm"
January 31,2006
Joseph E. Stofa Jr.
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Project Engineer
Community Development Division - Engineering Department
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, California 92729-0807
RE: Extension of Rancho Summit - Tract 14759-2 Improvement Agreement
Per the request of the Engineering Department, Pulte Homes has prepared this letter to
formally request an extension on our Tract 14759-2 Improvement Agreements in Rancho
Summit. Due to the size and length of our project, we have experienced some delays in
our original schedule. Therefore, we would like to thank the city for their understanding
and assistance in the extension of our Improvement Agreement.
rJJ j)fi 11
Best,
William Lu
Project Manager
951.218.5927 (Mobile)
This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain infonnation that is privileged
and confidential. If you are the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone and return the original message to us at
the above address via the US Postal Service. Thank you.
.....
North Inland Empire Division
1351 Pomona Road, Suite 200
Corona. California 92882
951-271-5800 Phone
951-271-5860 Fax
77
RAN C H 0
.----~
,__... _M
,
,
cue A M 0 N G A
ENGINEERINC DEPARTMENT
.J
Staff Report
,
DAlE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
March 1, 2006
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J, O'Neil, City Engineer
Tasha Hunter, Public Svc. Tech I
RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND FOR DRC2003-00302,
LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF ARROW ROUTE, WEST OF
HELLMAN AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY WEST ROCK. LLC
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance
Guarantee Bond, for DRC2003-00302, located on the south side of Arrow Route, west of
Hellman Avenue, submitted by West Rock, LLC
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The required one-year maintenance period has ended, and the street improvements remain
free from defects in materials and workmanship.
DEVELOPER
Release:
West Rock, LLC
14072 Pierson Court
Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91739
Receipt #CR053361
$1,150.00
Respectfully submitted,
'frJ( /!lA::/ [.(.
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:tch
Attachment
1~
-
=___"_~~~ ~._ ~ ".._"' _ o<._.~=_.".."."""
~. -"
~~. J_~,~..;
" ._, -.....
FOOTHILL
'.
s
ARROW ROUTE
SUBJ CT PROPERTY
8TH STREET
o
<>::
<<
>-
w
z
'>
z
<1:
:::;;
-'
~
w
:r:
o
~
<(
~,
:r:
u
<>::
<(
VICINITY MAP
NO SCALE -
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ENG.INEERING DIVISION
~
N
ITEM: '\)<('_ 1.C(','3' C:O:2:,U/_
T'IT'LE:/:oNSENi tWALV6R -
EXHm1T:j1I&S1' ROCK LLC
'llf
~
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
r:::=
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Staff Report
DAlE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
March 1, 2006
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Tasha Hunter, Public Svc. Tech I
RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND FOR DRC2003-00330,
LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF 6TH STREET AND
MILLIKEN AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY SILVER OAK DEVELOPMENT
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance
Guarantee Bond, for DRC2003-00330, located at the southwest corner of 6th Street and
Milliken Avenue, submitted by Silver Oak Development
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The required one-year maintenance period has ended, and the street improvements remain
free from defects in materials and workmanship,
DEVELOPER
Release:
Silver Oak Developrnent
8175 E. Kaiser Blvd.
Anaheim Hills. Ca 92808
Receipt # CR046672
$930,00
Respectfully submitted,
fro {>1 CL C{/
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:tch
Attachment
CZo
. . ".,
ARROW
ROUTE
. ...
_ 1~'
EMPIRE ~~!S
GOLF COUR'S~
',.
','...'.,
:;! ,
~
~ 6TH'
Q ST.
>
~
I
-
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ENGlNEEJRJ!NG DIVISION
S.'.'TE' ""
. . ..,
\. '.
.
w
>
<, 4rH STREET
z
'I.&J
~
3
-
:i
,j',
. '.
, . '
~
, N
ITEM;/I~!l1JlJ8-tJtJ.1g"
TITLE: VICIN.I~
't/
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
L-_~ ~_ ..___~_~-~-_.-:.=__-:._-"----~---.---~---
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
_...J
Staff Report
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
March 1, 2006
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Tasha Hunter, Public Svc. Tech I
RELEASE OF ALL MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BONDS FOR TRACTS
15727 AND 15727-1,2,3.... LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF
FOURTH STREET AND THE CUCAMONGA CREEK FLOOD CONTROL
CHANNEL BORDERED BY SIXTH STREET ON THE NORTH. SUBMITTED
BY CORNERPOINTE 257/ 85. LLC
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance
Guarantee Bond, for Tracts 15727 and 15727-1,2,3..., located at the intersection of Fourth
Street and the Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Channel Bordered by Sixth Street on the
north, submitted by Cornerpointe 257 / 85, LLC
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The required one-year maintenance period has ended, and the street improvements remain
free from defects in materials and workmanship.
DEVELOPER
Release:
Cornerpointe 257 / 85, LLC
24005 Ventura Blvd.
Calabasas, Ca 91302
All Maintenance Guarantee Bonds
Respectfully submitted,
L}[ t Z L/c CL
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:tch
Attachment
<62
u
Ji![
Jii[
(PTH
"\\
'\'1' . '1'
:'.::."....: : :'''.f~
~ "'",;;-/,i/:;:'''1/
~t1"~1 ~ "......o......,"',//' L
7. e<~., G ':J/ - -<1.-1';'~7'/'
;../ ",.........-J /'.....i /":;--
. ...... ~ " ~ <' V / i:?:j- '-7'"
- .. ~ ;;- ~ ;......v~ " ;.' ---, L
,;.::: ~ 'f/' ~ ~7
~,?,:o:'~ ( ... \~~~~I' :--j'~~ 7~
7.. -::'v. "'. ..?r::r-; ...'~~ ;. '-;--
-y,... A --- -' ..... <:::/-
::::/.;. ':1:..:- r ---. ....d~. /':;;: --: /
"".,- /f. /1 ;;:..-,
>:,~...-.../ . V......7.:<V'I'~;.~:;-" 2sl~/"~ ,: ~~_:~---'=:'
,;y .I-::y~." ~..:J,.~:;e; ~;" " ':,..~}-:v. \;;-j~ ".4V;-;;.
.. .. ~V --- / .::: "r; L~ :; .-":':; >':'';'('''7- ~~ -r ;-. .-;:: ~ 7::.-r
~~%'l% /' \J""-/ ~..;.- r-r-t...r~" '''-r~f2-~'-':--/
. :'Y.l.~ ~ ,p-./..... ~" ,.'" ....1'../ 7. ...... (: ,. ../,~...........
\~. ,,;,.:~ \to' .,><;~V~~ ~J;.-:'-~:/J?-:,7;-~;-.:" -/i'r.'.5::-
>:' , ... .\. \/ ~, .....:1......-:/./ ./ /f".~' /,........loIIJ........ /~. ~ /-......":'r;'-
r> 7- .'. ' . . ->.. .. , I r., j;' ,'..-< /'..-,
c." z,; .... .\- . . "~1.~ .. . . . ',(: ~:'>,~
>; ~.i" ,. "".1' <,. ;'. G1j.--t;. -j;.j'V ," ;YI7Z -:::: 2
't ~-1 I..t u...Af...~\~.~ \ -< ." ",;..""""'......../,,;., /./?~.~ ~.L;;
c:- ;--? ". / ~ .-;: .. ". '" J?' X'" .
,. LA; ........ .. .. .. .. " /. v __ /' ;;. .. ...,~ ~:..V . .." ..', L ~ t: .~
"t.;:,~,\..... ...:-:.:..- 1":/';:;~/A:;,I/-r.:{"7B;~
...... . \ ' '.' ~ l - ;,;. :;. "".;' ""' .. ;:, ...../ ~ 7. . .. .
/- ~.. ,,'-
r- %/,.......""""..~ /' roo"... /1 .....,,'"""'"""'0/">.7....<1://.. ,..
'.~:J.-r:;. -::'1"'- {-<,// 5-..G I r(:. .:: -1/i5 t 0;-::.-.,.. _
",.y::-<;~-;"i~7,/.--:; -1"<-(:)'""' ,=-=-=- --
--.......'. V" I.'! ./~:::.- / % ;)., _
-"...,~ ~'...PI" ,~[ /' l;g.:;fRT/ // -l~ IV '.p"I"'~lnQOll IIUl"l ~ ..
---.:'" . ..."'" ~ ........
~~-4:r~ T.. -1-. -I-- -+ ..l \- '____,
.. .
I I ~ {t ,
I
lu
~
<
Iu
i ."
, "-
<l
"
'>::
'XI
...
~
V
"<
"
'-{TH
I
-
~
A
NORTH
I" = 400'
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
E:-':G[NEERI~G DI\'1510\:
lTE\1: Troct,I:i727,(, 15727-7 and 15727-R
TITLE: Vicinil\' \1anrrentnti\'c Troc115727
EXHIBIT:
"A"
~3
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
L_"':-:"-~_
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Staff Report
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
March 1, 2006
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Tasha Hunter, Public Svc. Tech I
RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND FOR TRACT 16081,
LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF VICTORIA PARK LANE
AND DAY CREEK BOULEVARD, SUBMITTED BY TRIMARK PACIFIC _
DAY CREEK, LLC
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance
Guarantee Bond, for Tract 16081, located at the southwest corner of Victoria Park'Lane and
Day Creek Boulevard, submitted by Trimark Pacific - Day Creek, LLC
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The required one-year maintenance periOd has ended, and the street improvements remain
free frorn defects in materials and workmanship,
DEVELOPER
Release:
Trimark Pacific - Day Creek, LLC
3400 Central Avenue, Ste. 145
Riverside, Ca 92506
Maintenance Guarantee Bond #BE 0943204
$165,800,00
Respectfully submitted,
'1{Cc: {' ! (~{ cC
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:tch
Attachment
~4
-
I
II KT. 301'Z1O
'I
II Q
II SII. VERCfRKl'
I, :'>T.
PARK LA~
PROJECT SITE
.....'1 SUCiARGl.t1 TR. NO. 16081
~II .:;T.
"'\
l5 RR. R/W
I,
'I CA:'>f UHf ROAD
I ~
I, ~
I, ~ ~
~II
~II ~
...
II CHuRCH :;TRm
I )-
'1 '"
,..' Q
all
I,
I,
I
. II
'I
II
II
'VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
,
~5
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
r ---." --..- ----..-.----~----
'E'NG-i-N-TE-'R-,- N G 0 E PAR T MEN T
J
Staff Report
DATE:
TO:
March 1, 2006
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J, O'Neil, City Engineer
Tasha Hunter, Public Service Tech I
ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE
BOND, ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND AND FILE A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR BANYAN STREET EXTENSION
LOCATED WEST OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD AND EAST OF ROCHESTER
AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY RANCHO ETIWANDA 685, LLC
RECOMMENDATION:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
The required improvements for Banyan Street Extension have been completed in an acceptable
manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the
City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful
Perforrnance Bond and accept a Maintenance Bond.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
As a condition of approval of completion of Banyan Street Extension, located west of Day Creek
Boulevard and east of Rochester Avenue, the applicant was required to complete
improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City
Council release the existing Faithful Performance Bond and accept the Maintenance Bond.
Developer:
Release:
Accept:
Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC: 2392 Morse Avenue, Irvine, Ca 92614
Faithful Performance Bond # 3SM 047 784
(Bond No.)
Maintenance Bond # SU6001723
(Bond No,)
$821,000.00
$ 82,100.00
Respectfully submitted,
'-It/~i C /~ C)/
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:TCH
Attachment( s)
~b
J..
/ ~ .'~ J\\\IIIII
II J'l"~."
"-/___ -4C;: .' ~>:<: +4- "
~I ' "y;
, "% " -\
. .~. ~.. J'~ - t-r---
'1 "V"";H~ == h- ,.
~' '.',,~.J "" ~ _ - 1=1= l-
II l' '" " " .'.. - f-t- I-
rf~,. r/~ ~~.,:~;:.~~
\:4
\I
<4 .' c.' ,LU .~~
<< I BEtffFlHJ ,"",c ..~'" .1\'1' rI Rlr-~ ~
..s:
A- IC ~', 0''',' I-LLJ11 r-YDf-- Hf=
~~III / ~" ~::::Lt-[II J. IIN I=H~
1"1' ~>-
, II y ,~" 1. .LLJIJ.~ III1I 1'1111"-
I : m ti"'" gF-1-lw W Id [jJ UJ...I I II l/
ffiB~. ~ ~ 1\ ~
I '" ::U..J.l" ""'" 11l::J t:; ~
' II 'r-j r-
Il.l I I J I III J UII I II I J J I I 11 \ t.- 'l::
fffi:ffiffJ I \J I \ n I I II IW
\::{ J ~ I /I I Ii ttu ~ /' r I I I IIIJ I I I /111
nttBu. rTll q:
~ I lUlL r ~WIIIL ~ I
I rrfrll, I I ~ ~, . 1 I
1 J.J1bLIlillV '1- . ~
(l. ffiffi ~
III . ,
I Jill/II . 12:: ~ f'" ~
.
,1I1~ .
I ill 11111I .
. ~(;~
LlI ,I ,- -
~~II/II =1 - ... .IJ ..
!If
1K II 11/ J. "": m
1111 III r-- L'-
III II 1111 L r= r-
nnt=: =k- ..- f-- I,
r--
F ,-
\4 :llUII'"1 ,
ILl IIIIIH~=
~
VI '-!~~~ Street and Storm Drain Inti
({
..s ,
~ I Phase I: 210 Freeway
,lm - Phase 11: Banyan to W
, ~ Phase HI: North of Wi 1
" Storm Drains C &
I II I "1-- "" Storm Drain A-I
"" Ban an, Blue rass
~ .,
rastructure
to Banyan
ilson
son
G
?-IO rrwy
y g School Frontage
'k"'*" Bart'f"" +" Ro:ht's ter
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ENGINEERING DIVISION
NORTH II NTS
ITEM: Improvement Acceptance
TITLE: Rancho Etiwanda Infrastructure
<67 EXHIBIT: Vicinity Map
RESOLUTION NO. 0 r{r ~ 62
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR
BANYAN STREET EXTENSION AND AUTHORIZING
THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR
THE WORK
WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Banyan Street
Extension have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the
work is complete.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is
authorized to sign and file a Notice of Cqmpletion with the County Recorder of
San Bernardino County.
~8
STAFF REpORT
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Date:
To:
From:
By:
Subject:
March 1, 2006
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Cindy Hackett, Associate Enginee.l.--~
Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Tec~';:t8a~ ~
RELEASE OF FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND NO. 08739331 IN THE
AMOUNT OF $157,325.90, FOR THE ARROW ROUTE PAVEMENT
REHABILITATION FROM ARCHIBALD AVENUE TO HERMOSA AVENUE,
CONTRACT NO. 04-168
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release Faithful Performance
Bond No. 08739331, in the amount of $157,325.90 for the Arrow Route Pavement Rehabilitation
from Archibald Avenue to Hermosa Avenue, Contract No, 04-168.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free
from defects in materials and workmanship.
Contractor: Silvia Construction, Inc.
9007 Center Avenue
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730-5311
Respectfully submitted,
cjtJ&(:tU./cl
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:CH/RO:ls
Attachments
~q
(,
.'0
VICINITY
MAP
:
uPLAND
J~
._'.~ '... -tt:!l:t.-~. -L-.~.
I,' ' t Jllc,. . ~._.::~AW. ,.
,J!, ~..- . i. ,
*' :........ "'" .'
.- ....--.,;
fII: I l --
..'. " '_AW; ~ !
I!:w", ._-
I ; ~ ~,
I
I
i
" 0;
-
.....
... . ~
.,
1
.
IANYAN"ST
:.
,.
.,.~.
"~,.__'_[ ,...~>E._
e.
;e ; : :::t
iE_ : ==_
. - .-.-
: .. t. =--__~. __
I "'UlIlI!l' '
'.
.
...-..--........
I
~
.
.
I
""0 y
PROJECT SITE
. CITY OF' RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ARROW ROUTE
(411/'!RIRUD 'in) JlRWOSl AVEN1:lI)
PAVImmfr 'Imr&1nT.1TA.TION
{N}'
N.T.3. 0
March 1, 2006
STAFF REpORT
ENGINEERING DEP",RTMENT
Date:
To:
From:
By:
Subject:
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Larn, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Cindy Hackett, Associate Engineer &
Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Technician ~
ACCEPT THE FY 2005/06 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION _
OVERLAY OF VARIOUS STREETS, CONTRACT NO. 05-074 AS COMPLETE,
RETAIN THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND AS A GUARANTEE BOND,
RELEASE THE LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY
ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND APPROVE THE FINAL
CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $1,019,267.84
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council accept the FY 2005/06 Local Street Pavement
Rehabilitation - Overlay of Various Streets, Contract No. 05-074, as complete, authorize the City
Engineer to file a notice of Completion, retain the Faithful Performance Bond as a Guarantee Bond,
authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $998,694,00 six months
after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received and authorize the release of the
retention in the amount of $101,926.78, 35 days after acceptance. Also, approve the final contract
amount of $1 ,019,267.84.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications
and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
The 2005/2006 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation - Overlay of Various Streets scope of work
consisted of clearing and grubbing, cold milling, crack sealing, asphalt concrete overlay, re-striping
and pavement markings. Pertinent information of the project is as follows:
:;- Budgeted Amount:
" Account Numbers:
$278,100.00 (Fund 124) & $832,000,00 (Fund 176)
12043145650/1527204-0 & 11763035650/1022176-0
~ Engineer's Estimate: $935,373.75
,.
~ City Council's Approval to Advertise: May 18, 2005
,.
~ Publish dates for local paper: May 24, & June 7, 2005
,.
~ Bid Opening: June 28, 2005
,.
~ Contract Award Date: August 3, 2005
,.
91
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Re: Accept FY 2005/06 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation - Overlay of Various
Streets
March 1, 2006
Page 2
~ Low Bidder: Laird Construction Co., Inc,
, Contract Amount: $998,694.00
,
, 10% Contingency: $99,869.40
,
~ Final Contract Amount: $1,019,267,84
~ Difference in Contract Amount: $20,573.84 (2.06%)
The net increase in the total cost of the project is a result of one contract change order that added
streets in the Northtown area of the City, north of 8th Street and west of Haven Avenue,
ReSPC;;.5!f lIy SUbmit,ted, ,
.' (Vl~tJ-,
I
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:CH/RO:ls
Attachment
92.
--A-
VICINITY MAP
MAP-. B- .
MAP--C"
LEGEND:
m, STREET FOR REHAB.
~ (A-c. 0VERlA'I)
, ,
"}
.
.
I .. .
.
.
..
-
.
,
--
MAP--r!
,-
. .._~...L
.
~.. MInI_
-..~-
.." ~..
. ..:~-Y ,
CITy., OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
'~~~~.. -. ....~-~#,;. -",-.. .
FY '2005/06 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION
, " A.C. OVERLAY
.. ._-....
, .
,...
.
.
.
.
.
.
1l.T.lL
RESOLUTION NO. tJ~ - tJ6.J
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE FY
2005/06 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION _
OVERLAY OF VARIOUS STREETS. CONTRACT NO. 05-074
AND AUTHORIZING THE FlUNG OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
WHEREAS, the FY 2005/06 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation - Overlay of
Various Streets, Contract No. 05,074, has been completed to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer; and
complete.
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a
Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County.
qLj
THE CITY OF
r--
RANCtlO CUCAMONGA
---.I
Staff Report
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
March 1, 2006
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Gary Varney, Street Maintenance Superintendent
ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL
PERFORMANCE AND LABOR AND MATERIALS BONDS, AND FILE A
NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR CITYWIDE STREET NAME SIGN
REPLACEMENT, PHASE 3
RECOMMENDATION
The required street name sign replacements have been completed in an acceptable
mariner, and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements and authorize
the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the
Faithful Performance and Labor and Materials Bonds in the amount of $38,405.00
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Per previous Council action, the bids for the Citywide Street Name Sign Replacement,
Phase 3 project were received and awarded to the lowest responsive bidder, Sadie
Construction, Inc, The subject project has been completed in accordance with the
approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Improvements at the above mentioned locations by:
CONTRACTOR: Sadie Construction, Inc.
Release: Faithful Performance and Labor and Materials Bonds
$38,405.00
Respectfully submitted, .
'j, t
(iut.l? (~. U\.-
Willia J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:GV:ju
Attachment
erE
RESOLUTION NO. Or:, - ()t I
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR CITYWIDE STREET NAME SIGN
REPLACEMENT, PHASE 3 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A
NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Citywide Street Name
Sign Replacement, Phase 3 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer;
and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work
is complete.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
hereby resolves that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign
and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County.
Cj(P
ORDINANCE NO. 754
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION
10.20.020 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY CODE
REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN CITY
STREETS
A. RECITALS.
(i) California Vehicle Code Section 22357 provides that the City Council may, by
ordinance, set prima facie speed limits upon any portion of any street not a state
highway.
(ii) The City Traffic Engineer has conducted an engineering and traffic survey, of
certain streets within the City of Rancho Cucamonga which streets as specified
in Part B of this Ordinance.
(Hi) The determinations concerning prima facie speed limits set forth in Part B,
below, are based upon the engineering and traffic survey identified in Section A
(ii), above.
B. ORDINANCE.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1:
Section 10.20.020 hereby is amended to the Rancho Cucamonga City Code to read,
in words and fi9ures, as follows:
10.20.020 Decrease of state law maximum speed. It is determined by City
Council resolution and upon the basis of an engineering and traffic
investigation that the speed permitted by state law is greater than is
reasonable or safe under the conditions found to exist upon such streets,
and it is declared the prima facie speed limit shall be as set forth in this
section on those streets or parts of streets designated in this section when
signs are erected giving notice hereof:
(Ord. 169 Section I (part), 1982: Ord. 39 Section 5.1, (1978). Rancho Cucamonga 5/82124
Name of Street and Limits
Existing Posted
Speed Limit (mph)
Proposed Prima Facie
Speed Limit (mph)
1. Kenyon Way, Fairmont Way to
Milliken Avenue
None
35
2. Base Line Road, West City Limit to
Carnelian Street
45
45
q1
Ordinance No. 754
Existing Posted Proposed Prima Facie
Name of Street and Limits Speed Limit (mph) Speed Limit (mph)
3. Base Line Road, Carnelian Street to 40 40
Hellman Avenue
4. Base Line Road, Hellman Avenue to 45 40
Archibald Avenue
5. Base Line Road, Archibald Avenue to 45 40
Hermosa Avenue
6. Base Line Road, Hermosa Avenue to 45 45
Haven Avenue
7. Base Line Road, Haven Avenue to 45 45
Spruce Avenue
(i) Both sixty-five (65) miles per hour and fifty-five (55) miles per hour are speeds
which are more than are reasonable or safe; and
(ii) The miles per hour as stated are the prima facie speeds which are most
appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and are speed limits
which are reasonable and safe on said streets or portions thereof; and
(iii) The miles per hour stated are hereby declared to be the prima facie speed limits
on said streets; and
(iv) The Traffic Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to install appropriate
signs upon said streets giving notice of the prima facie speed limit declared
herein.
SECTION 2:
The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this Ordinance and shall cause the
same to be published as required by law.
SECTION 3:
The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to
be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Inland
Dailv Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario,
California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
CjZ
THE
L
RANCHO
CITY OF
CUCAMONGA
Staff Report
DATE: March 1,2006
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP. City Manager
FROM: Dan Coleman, Acting City Planner
BY: Larry Henderson AICP, Principal Planner
SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2004-00269 - LEWIS INVESTMENT
COMPANY - A request to change the land use designation from Community
Commercial to Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) on 9,68 acres
on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, east of Etiwanda Avenue.
APN: 1100-161-04, Related files: Development Review DRC2004-00268,
Development District DRC2004-00270, and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16882.
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2004-00270 " LEWIS
INVESTMENT COMPANY - A request to change the zoning designation from
Community Commercial to Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre)
within the Foothill Boulevard Districts on 9.68 acres on the north side of Foothill
Boulevard, east of Etiwanda Avenue. APN: 1100-161-04. Related files:
Development Review DRC2004-00268, General Plan Amendment
DRC2004-00269, and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16882.
RECOMMENDATION: Certify the attached Initial Study and a Mitigated Negative Declaration.
Approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00269 and Development District Amendment
DRC2004-00270 by adoption of the attached Resolution and Ordinance attached hereto, as
recommended by Staff and the Planning Commission,
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The site is located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard,
approximately 500 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue, and is characterized by Medium Density
Residential developed with apartments to the north, vacant Office Commercial to the east,
Community Commercial and Low Density Residential across Foothill Boulevard to the south,
and underutilized commercial and residential uses zoned Cornmunity Commercial to the west.
This project will be of a similar design and size to neighboring apartment development to the
north. The project will become a part of the larger community. The project site land use
designation is currently Community Commercial with Medium Density Residential proposed.
The site design included a Master Plan for the adjoining area to the west and east since those
are proposed to remain General Commercial and Office. The Master Plan illustrates that the
proposed uses and the requested amendment could reasonably work together and should not
be detrimental to the ultimate development of the area.
qq
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DRC2004-00269 AND DRC2004-00270- LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY
March 1, 2006
Page 2
The Planning Commission reviewed and recommended approval of the Land Use Amendments
on January 11, 2006. In addition, the Commission approved (conditioned on approval of the
Land Use Amendments) a tract map and design review applications for a 99-unit condominium
project on that same date, There was no opposition and the development applications were not
appealed.
Details and findings of fact concerning the referenced applications are contained in the attached
Planning Commission staff report.
Environmental Assessment: An Initial Study and a Mitigated Negative Declaration was
prepared and is recommended for adoption.
CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Vallev Dailv
Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners
within a 300-foot radius of the project site.
CONCLUSION: Although not a true mixed-use center, the amendment will break up the
commercial strip make-up of this section of Foothill Boulevard and, therefore, supports the intent
of this goal and discussion in the General Plan.
Therefore, this amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and
will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and
with related development.
The submitted Master Plan and all other evidence demonstrate that the Development District
Amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and
woul t have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties.
Dan Coleman
Acting City Planner
DC:LH\rna
Attachments: Exhibit A - Planning Commission Staff Report dated January 11, 2006
Exhibit B - Planning Commission Minutes dated January 11, 2006
Exhibit C - Planning Commission Resolution No. 06-02 Approving General Plan
Amendment DRC2004-00269
Exhibit 0 - Planning Commission Resolution No. 06-03 Approving Development
District Amendment DRC2004-00270
10-0
THE CITY OF
I
RANCUO CUCAMONGA
Staff Report
DATE January 11, 2006
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Dan Coleman, Acting City Planner
BY: Larry Henderson AICP, Principal Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
DRC2004-00269 - LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY - A request to change the
land use designation from Community Commercial to Medium Residential
(8-14 dwelling units per acre) on 9.68 acres on the north side of Foothill Boulevard,
east of Etiwanda Avenue. APN: 1100-161-04. Related files: Development
Review DRC2004-00268, Development District DRC2004-00270, Tentative Tract
Map SUBTT16882.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
AMENDMENT DRC2004-00270 - LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY - A request to
change the zoning designation from Community Commercial to Medium
Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) within the Foothill Boulevard Districts on
9.68 acres on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, east of Etiwanda Avenue,
APN: 1100-161-04. Related files: Development Review DRC2004-00268,
General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00269, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16882.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16882
- LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY - A request for a seven numbered and two
lettered lot subdivision of 9.68 acres for 99 condominiums on the north side of
Foothill Boulevard, east of Etiwanda Avenue. APN: 1100-161-04. Related files:
Development Review DRC2004-00268, General Plan Amendment
DRC2004-00269, Development District Amendment DRC2004-00270.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
DRC2004-00268 - LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY - A request to develop
99 condominiums on 9.68 net acres within the Community Commercial land use
designation of the Foothill Boulevard Districts on the north side of Foothill
Boulevard, east of Etiwanda Avenue. Land use amendment applications to
change the zoning to residential categories are accompanying this application.
APN: 1100-161-04. Related files: General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00269,
Development District DRC2004-00270, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16882.
Gf-l/8/r If
I 0 I
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DRC2004'00268 THROUGH -00270 AND SUBTT16882, LEWIS INVESTMENT CO.
January 11 , 2006
Page 2
PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Proiect Densitv: 10.23 dwelling units per net acre.
B. Surroundina Land Use and Zonina:
North - Apartments; Etiwanda Specific Plan; Medium Density (8-14 dwelling units per
acre)
South - Foothill Boulevard; Single-Family Residential; Low Density (2-4 dwelling units
per acre); Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Community Commercial
East Vacant with Utility Overhead Power Lines and temporary Flood Water Retention
Basin, Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan; Commercial Office
West Vacant, underutilized with some single-family residences and commercial uses;
designated Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan; Community Commercial
C. General Plan Desianations:
Project Site - General Commercial existing, with Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units
per acre) proposed
North Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre)
South Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre); General Commercial
East Office
West General Commercial
D. Site Characteristics: The site is generally flat site and drains to the south. The properly to
the north is elevated via a retaining wall approximately 4 to 5 feet higher than the subject
property, In addition, a Metropolitan Water District easement across the Foothill
Boulevard frontage imposes restrictions on the location and types of trees that can be
allowed.
E. Parkina Calculations:
Visitor Number
Spaces of Visitor
Required Number of Number Ratio Spaces
Square Parking Spaces of Spaces Required Provided
Tvpe of Use Footaae Ratio Reauired Provided per Unit per Unit
33 2bd/.2 bth 1,335 1.8 60 66 .25 .38
(1 covered) (30 covered)
33 3bd/2.5 bth 1,803 2 66 66 .25 .38
33 3bd/2.5 bth 1,920 2 66 66 .25 .38
TOTAL 192 198 25 38
ANALYSIS:
A. General: The site is located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, approximately 500
feet east of Etiwanda Avenue, and is characterized by developed Medium density
apartments to the north, vacant Office Commercial to the east, single-family Low density
across Foothill Boulevard to the south, and underutilized commercial and residential uses
zoned Community Commercial to the west. This project will be of a similar design and
size to neighboring apartment development to the north. The project will become a part of
/02.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DRC2004-00268 THROUGH -00270 AND SUBTT16882 - LEWIS INVESTMENT CO.
January 11, 2006
Page 3
the larger community. The project site land use designation is currently Comrnunity
Commercial with Medium Density Residential proposed. The design utilizes a tri-plex
building with double loaded drive aisles and pedestrian court yards with strong
architectural elements that emphasize the vintner heritage of the area. The proposed
project is consistent with the General Plan and the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and
Improvement Plan.
B, Site Desion: The site design includes a Master Plan for the adjoining area to the west and
east since those are proposed to remain General Commercial and Office. The Master
Plan does illustrate that the proposed uses and the requested amendment could
reasonably work together and should not be detrimental to the ultimate development of the
area.
C. Architectural Desion: The theme of the proposed residential property supports the Route
66 Visual Improvement Plan while providing a vineyard architectural theme which is
complimentary. The community buildings and gates are of a vintner style architecture.
The triplex building units are of a traditional craftsman and Spanish revival styles which is
highly compatible and should establish a rich tapestry for the neighborhood,
D. Desion Review Committee:
November 15, 2005,
Reviewed and recommended for approval on
E. Technical Review Committee: Reviewed and recommended for approval with conditions
on November 15, 2005.
F, Gradino Committee: On November 15, 2005, the Committee reviewed and recommended
approval with the condition for the project to accept the runoff from the west property.
G. Environmental Assessment: An Initial Study and a Mitigated Negative Declaration was
prepared and is recommended for adoption,
FACTS FOR FINDING:
General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00269
1. Fact - General Plan Goal 2.6.1,3.2 states;" Restrict strip commercial development in
favor of more focused commercial or mixed-use centers."
Discussion: We have some strip commercia/ development because of the shape
and size of some parcels of land along arteria/ highways, We would like to see those
parcels consolidated so they can be more efficiently developed and avoid traffic
conflicts caused by multip/e driveways. We have used master planning of land to
good advantage to avoid expanding strip centers, We will continue to use creative
planning tools to restrict strip development.
Although not a true mixed use center, the amendment will break up the commercial
strip make-up of this section of Foothill Boulevard and, therefore, supports the intent
of this goal and discussion in the General Plan.
Therefore, this amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the
General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner
consistent with the General Plan and with related development.
/{J3
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DRC2004-00268 THROUGH -00270 AND SUBTT16882 - LEWIS INVESTMENT CO.
January 11, 2006
Page 4
2. Fact, General Plan Goal 2.6.1.3.9 states; "Allow medium and high density
residential uses along transit routes in mixed-use areas and in the vicinity of activity
centers. "
Discussion: We need the diversity of housing provided by these residential
categories and would like to reinforce increased transit use where that is feasible.
The synergy between more intensive residential uses and such activities as
recreation centers, cultural facilities, entertainment centers and commercia/ areas
serves to give our citizens a greater lifestyle choice than is afforded by exc/usively
sing/e-family residential development.
Foothill Boulevard is a transit route and is in the vicinity of the activity center
identified at the intersection of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard, Therefore,
this amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element.
3, Fact - The Master Plan clearly demonstrates that the proposed use is designed with
a high degree of compatibility through landscape setback buffers and pedestrian
walkway connections to adjacent commercial designated areas.
Therefore, this amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the
adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor
the surrounding properties.
Development District Amendment DRC2004-00270
1. Fact - The size and configuration of the property and the submitted Master Plan and
all other evidence demonstrates that the Development District Amendment is
suitable for the uses allowed under the General Plan as amended under
DRC2004-00268 and compatible with the surrounding existing and proposed uses.
2. Fact - The proposed Development District Amendment is consistent with the General
Plan Designation as proposed for amendment DRC2004-00269 and all applicable
goals and policies of the General Plan,
3. Fact, The submitted Master Plan and all other evidence demonstrates that the
Development District Amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to
the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment
nor the surrounding properties.
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16882
1. Fact - That the tentative tract map is consistent with the General Plan, Development
Code, and any applicable specific plans as amended by the previously referenced
applications.
2. Fact - The design and master plan of the tentative tract map has demonstrated
consistency with the General Plan, Development Code, as amended by the
previously referenced applications.
3. Fact - The environmental record and the design of the subdivision demonstrates it is
not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to
humans and wildlife or their habitat, or cause serious health problems.
16~
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DRC2004-00268 THROUGH -00270 AND SUBTT16882 - LEWIS INVESTMENT CO.
January 11 , 2006
Page 5
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00268
1. Fact - The Architectural Plans, including the Master Plan, demonstrates that the
proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan as amended,
and the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district as
amended in which the site is located.
2. Fact - As amended by the previously referenced land use applications and the
information in the Architectural Plans, including the Master Plan, demonstrates that
the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the
Development Code,
3. Fact - The Architectural Plans, including the Master Plan, demonstrates that the
proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental
to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity,
CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Vallev Dailv
Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners
within a 300-foot radius of the project site.
RECOMMENDATION: Approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16882 and Development
Review DRC2004-00268 and forward a recommendation of approval to the City Council for
action on General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00269 and Development District Amendment
DRC2004-00270.
R)OC'""
Dan Coleman
Acting City Planner
DC:LH\ma
Attachments: Exhibit A - Location Map
Exhibit B - Master Plan
Exhibit C - Site Utilization Map
Exhibit 0 ' Tentative Tract Map
Exhibit E - Conceptual Grading Plan
Exhibit F - Detailed Site Plan
Exhibit G - Elevations and Floor Plans
Exhibit H - Initial Study Parts I and II
Draft Resolution Recommending Approval for General Plan Amendment
DRC2004-00269
Draft Resolution Recommending Approval for Development District Amendment
DRC2004-00270
Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16882
Draft Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2004-00268
ID5
,. >~~
u
..
,1/
,
I
!
I
J
AMADOR ON ROUTE 66
SUBTT 16882, DRC2004-00268
EXHIBIT A
yc \lld 010
(60
-r~,--;-
-....:-
!J
A"~: ,
",
"
I,
~ '.!" ,
~
"~j
'J~~ :
" '
i~III-' :-1
F I -
)';:1,1 1 "
;:s)
~
'"
'"
- _ r:1 ;~I
_~u
~ i;t'\
0111
0_<1\
~ 1\ :
~:J~':~
"
,
,
dill:
r......,
Ir I/I~~~
, "I,: /I~~_
i ~;;Ii//J~':"'.'!! ~.--
if 111/////1, /' 'f'
I G"I" '/ti/:/R
!- I."". .u
If/hi//"I
'lil,t/li"If}
'I DII', "I" !/:u
l7 ///f1.J..JJ.f'-.-..
iI
(:j
',j
,
- '\
~ :~~..-\."--=~:",:j;Y1f . _~ JONJ/jV-
- - ~~~~~~-~{-_\_--
EXHIBIT B
\11\ \~ ~
-1 :
"j '"
..: E ~:!:
<(; i gJ ~~
01 ;e
_;; ,t:!i
..~~W E
.,,'11
-i1' ~
...j III u
~ji...
~D
:,
'3AV lW,y,N1!OJ
v
~
<:
~
\0 0
Z\O N '"
::J
:5 II) 00 <:
00 u
II "-- \D
, ~ ::l .:
! ! i -
! I j! I I UJO f-< "
1 t;;~_ z
II i I i I' U 0
I II,., 'I,j -< 0 UJ ~ ::;
:. 1I ill I ~1 ::EO::E <:
,!I'I 'II I!' >- UJ u
J.III' e< '" ::>
,'~ ,,.'" r;o,,!>,'t/ <~u f-< u
~O(/) 0
f-< :I;
'I ~Cl Z u
II! II z
[ , . i iil~ ~ ;;i
\ lhldllj ii::;'E f-< '"
II" , III ~: 0
\ 11.11/1 j' ~ ,.
," 'Jl~'~' "" ....
II I ! 0
II 'J i
"11' ,
ii! I; h
~ lllllt!!
Iii in Ii.
Ill:l. ,.
",:., ','"
I
,
, I
I I
"1'1
If If,
~ J! II i I
~ ~.. "'''(0)-''''''
e-
o
U
OJ) . '"
c: E 00
'p ~:::;
o:l <:'"
~ ,s.~
~~<8
o 6~~
tI) ~U9'
.~ :i-d"~
o:g3~
~:::'~~/01
_111II)
Slill " 'CMV1
DU XfJS YTd 3Wit" tmNIIDII 71''''
3T7 '.INYJJ<<KJ JJGI'US1ANI S/M71
_"m!l!!'_.
.._,,-
. II
i
.., . , ....~1- i
~~ I II I
~~ I~ iill~
ii!~ liIwq
:OO.....;lhl
;s\..) ,.
I~ ~hi; b
~!:t !ill ~I' Ii
l::;l!l d
SI;;"l: .~ I
e::"" ~ -w .
~iU~(
....,-
~Iqd___wt'.
I \ ~r!1
__ ~aw~~1
dvn
NOlLIIZI7lJ/I311S
--
..,.,-
_fll1fl
Wi.If 10 "/7iWM)
fIiIX1J6W~N/fJJItI(J/f"ItI'
m~JJrO:).JJG/f1SJJJl1sum
~-~~~I
, ..2!!!l'5.....
----
--
"I
IIi
III ""1
l~mh
'IIIII'~
... I" mil
hili
"'10' .......
I ..
, I 55
i I I! !o.
Ii! I
. III ji
II
! ....,~-Pa. i
J
i
,
,
I. I
~ III I
~I; I;~ I
iht; II~I
~i~ II ., h
~~~ =~ ~Ii II
I!:!~f,;j ,,~~. .
, l::! U, I
I '
.
EXHIBIT D
NI.t=MU:.JVlkUdlIttRHlJ M"*
rMV lO';IJJ.1 llIl i i::
3A/l '(.1N3J. . I ~. I
IUtiDGJ -- ,I 'j;
II ! 1 t I' I
III 'I i1d IIII 1111
HI!~ .llilllllliH Ii ~
.
11~5 uflli :
~i
I () r
..".1-
INJ/HH(1fJI!
tulf 'IC:II tlWWJ
~lrJI '0''' 2WZC~JmJi1ItJIIlINII
:Tn 'AN'tJ/to3 JH1flJ.S3AHI SlIm
_"i!!!l!:_.
~_.-
i III I
~I~ 1.lb I
Ii!~ .W ip
IIi!hh; ~
~ lia 'I" II
~I ~i!~11
EXHIBIT E
<<nI1MWJI'MId:lJlIlIO~1ftt.
~
......-
~ M__'__ I
~..,..r
Z1ItJ9IJJ8!1S J:W/U J.<<Irl/G/
.BItX:IJ.axMIf
--
--
NnJ DNKM:D
"J'tIflbBJN(X)
-
-! ~
J d I
Id
'Ill
~:U I~
. l!l
1,1 Y
· d I 1'111.
III Ip "111 R Ci n
1.1, iUI, Ilb~ !mlili illll
~.,..I I I
illllllL 11'1. I I,
I!!!lm!~ 111.ft ~d 1111 h~
Hllil.11I1 11.11 lIill
I!!
II
n
u
I
i! III
,tllll:ln
1IIIIIhtI III
'U'U18~ne
L!
....'....ftf-i
.
II 0
MlI-III fa) ..,.,-
~~!OO~:::;' I
~., ,
~~ I Ii I
I~i li'l
I~ !I ~
~b ill
I ~ ~~ n; h
~~ -n-,
--
.1
'..
I
I
~ DW:;=E~ I
I
-
P' OOhr -f -- '---...,... - ..-.
I I '
t t
I I
I
,
I
..........
~--:.I_-<n~
__ _ . I I.(:JI
I I .
vi
i
I
I
I
-, -. I
,
/1/
-"!!!!!!e"_.
..-..-
~ ~r_- I
ZfIIJJI.uans .l3m .JWr1taL
BIJ i1l11OII.6IX/tIIV
......
lWiI:m.crnmlr4rln...,,,,.:It ~
31Bp:'Ea I ~F!I
..,.,-
_111I<I
WiIl'r:1'il1'nr1
rJDzr/I'lTd~rlmlllDlf'NMJ
m ~cfA'O:) JN11IJDANI SIfI17
--
III i
I Iii I I :1 !l
I ,_!- !l
Ihl!!ld II II. . I
1111111I111 ~~ OliuM~IUlli~
I"
I-i~
dill
Ii
..-.,~~
i
.
~ Ib II II
~I; 1~1iI1 I
~It I;m
I ~ ~IIG h
~~ bap.'
j:::i!l
~~..~ .
l~ ll~ I
. -
.
-- -~ -
'~I
[ ,
I I
I I
EXHIBIT F
1/2-
I'
I
,J.
1,1
,II I
"I I
l~!j ~ !.
1111111 J II
I!. !I!~l!lml
II @@
I
K
"
"
l!
j' I
., I I
Ii ild
!l 'I>;',
i I-I!
11'11,111
ii,illll !Iii
!U!!~ II i!~!
@ @@ @
I
! I
" . I
I '
III II jl
11!!d I III
@ <!I<!Il!>1l
,--
I
I I
II, I
IIl!J Ij II
iii I! P,l'
I n I!~! Ill!~!
ElEl El Ell!>
, -
I .
~ I;! -
~ I, II
b Ii "
ijj I' ,I ill
~!l !idlN
I !! !l~!!I!1
8 I
~ ,III . I I ,lll I Iljl'l 'lid j III
R I U : I~ II I I h Ihil~I!!lllllb.!l~lf1ldil!lii IJ I i
! j I I I I 1111 II II J
! 1~~~I~~II~mb~illmlllllbl
~:!lll
<-I;
""'1'
, <.
-"j
~~~;A
,_,I
~~ .1'
:4.. "
3:<1111
f'-
::j
,
.j I
'j [
': II!I
:thh
"1111I
~~
i~
,
I
,
I
1
,
I
,
I \0
i 3 ~iS en
, '" f-< .~
1 ~ 5~ 0
, ~ ~6 ~
I ~ a~ ~
, t ~o ~
! ~~ o~ ~
10
u
:~
~
/13
" "
..,...............,. .
T 'lSO
..
1'1'1'
.. -,zli
0(-111
3'1'1'
.t-<" I
~~~ii
';1 I
3~ln~
3:..lth
::j
i :j I
. I
.:: A,!.
:fhh
i .... hu
~Ik-
--I
-
:z
~
i:l
~
0
i2
I ~
l~ g L_ - -- .~ \0
~I g > 3 ~~ ~
Ii.
. g
in i 0.. . ~
~ o~ g
tI) ":0 z
~ Sg ~
::> ..:::; ~
~ 05....l
i ~ ~~ ~
~
I
~
I
-'-
J
~
.. wv p~
7/~
~
~
....""'!ft!1fE-.
i
I
@I
~
II
~: Illill
.11 I li!1 · iur.
g ~ ~ ~I lift I
1@12l Hi "
I~
on
:2:!i!1
~ I
!.I,I
gill
Ii "I
11:=
m"cq
Hi!i
I!hll
I,.
115
EXHIBIT G
-.;.'
t\ ,,)ot..
~
o
IolII
gzll
~- .
\ ......I.I
_~'II
~!:;I
';;11
~u I
:!q: II
~< .
\0
\0<
~ ~ z
~<<
u ;::~ tn
~ ~::; i
~ ~~~~
~ ;s::<z
::l ~"o
.. z >-
S ~~ ~
i o~, ~
z O~, ~
8 <:I:
~~
<
.~
;;
:1
-=
o
/11.0
~'
.
,
[gJ
; .... /1 ,.
,! I'll', ", I /' Ik:> V
1 ~,I " 0 ~,/ '.lfl """ !I
"[I'" ::tI1.....X
: dl J Z... =1 :.~.:+:
i "I j ...~" " k~,:"--<::;
~-"'III !J a v ~ " 1Io~ V
i~( J~/c.. N ',:;,:~'W~
1 j(~~,~,.,,~ ',"',W. ,,~~,,!,;:~
:..,~",,"I,'R~';.~,~!ill ._".
: ,
, ... ....\ ~,:
;. " ,,/ I 1:><,0
l "'111.I ..../' ~: IXt
~ "I'--~' .
Ji ~,~ "
:; ~.., ~I
!!/5 6~" ~I
n 0.. N ',i 0 j
/~g '~
!!i,,-W;~~~ ":
" " ..../ I !
i:II!, "~I" r/ ~i H~~'
fI, Ii z~, ~I!O
lil' !l <5' is. ' ., "-r
I II !f"Q,..... ".... I 1?~,
!l ....u .... I k.(~>
~:,_r "~~~l~~G':~
~i~
_,...J
.' -'
<
~
,I ~ ,. "jil~?
.~ ""0'"
L . ~.;-~. ~:~:-
~lt.,...-J
,i I r~~
, U '~I~
aJ r-l
bJ~ I
I
'[;:~I ;
..:.... ,.,.
"'.-r
::l~
~~
''']
1'-ir-~-1i
'Ii' ~~
r~I\\ ~ ~
L_~,WU~
. ,
I ..~
c'-
[gJ..,,: 6
!-.:.~
.
""o~:,
~~~~
0. ,..~
r -
~ ' -~'
111-'
lit
. ,
--
~~_..', -
~D
.("~.~'
:-!-'~::;..J
(;~J-'
[':'],fJ;i,
>1"'" , '~','
~. : ,,'
~;; , :;;~
...L:: :1'
::l :",,='j'
..--..."",Oi "J1
l '~:~~'~f:~
NO":~ -, "}~b:"
3~8~ 'TT
~>....:;.
~I~
~
u:
i......'m.._'m'-~.ll
! I
I '
..:..: i
~~ N
"lIIi.....&
~ ,,"l>~ ~
z -- .~"
~~~~:li.3
~::ll::!.........",
'"
i 01:' ~
oI~l~ f\ -__
:....rf
~ ::i
~ "i "'-
zg
<~
-,It
0..::>
8
j
iliili ::J
~~l-"
'" ~">j"
z ::;u: 13
:s ~g~ D
~"""P"""'''''
~
m
u.:~ ~
""!!!-e-"
" :i~,'!~f!
Z Dt...lU:~O
:s ~g~:li.3
0................",....
ili
"Ii
z~
a
o
Xdl'
~z .
.l.o ~;il
~~::d
j~il
~i~
d.
\0
\0<
z
..
o '"
~ w
~
........
~
o ~ ~
~~ ~
;s:: ~ z
o z ~
o ~
~ ~
u <
:> ~
u ~
o 3:
:t
U
Z
<
..
~
o
Q
-<
~
~'=
.~
o
o
-
/l1
/'
,
~.
I
o
o
0"1'
~~;S:
r t'
_~=l
.... ~o'l
~~:!i
l~i
~o.,
:I...
3dl
'-0
'-0 ~
~~
~O V>
~ ~~ ~
0::; :::E
~ ~~ 0
I
~~ Z
0
~ Oz >-
0 ~
~ ::; :::E
, <
~ O~ <
-'
~~ -'
;:
~~
::':l.
:I
o
-
-
1I~
~
~
rJ
-
o
~~!l
-.-
.f'
..~"ll
~~~;
'ill
~o;;!1
....
3dl
'!J
'!J~
ili ~~
~o V>
~ .::: w
~~ ::;;
'" ~~ 0
,
< :I:
~ ;z;::~ z
0
~z >-
~ 0 ~
~~ ::;;
O~ <
!!l ~
~ ~~ ~
S:
~~
!i
l:-=
~i
.~
.~
o
111. I
~
o
~~!;
....i'.1
-<-II
-~~~ft
~J:..i
~~i!
,.1,
j:<ia
~
'"
'"
'"
~
'"
,
..
\0
\0:0
~~
....... 0 ~
~ ~ ~
3::i 0
~ U I
...... <' Z
......" 0
o z >-
o ~
.J:E. ::i.
~ < <
au -
::> ~
~~ ~
~~
I
I
:I
.~
o
N\
-
/1D
e
v
-
o
'"II
g, .
rd~
-- <='1
~i:l
="1'
~~ II
.. .
3:<11
~
~
'-0
'-0:;
z
~'"
-4-l 0 '"
~~ w
Q::; ::<
,.J<o
1-'04 U I
<. z
~" 0
Q z >-
o ~
,.J::! ::<
1-'04 < <
au -
" ~
~~ ~
~'~
,
U
'"
i
'"
I
=!
..~
:i
Di
I
12 J
~
~
\J'
-
o
gm
tl~
~ ~~;I
e>,_ I
>~B
~u.1
...lu;.
;:<11
~
~
..
,
"
\0
\O~
~~
....... 0 V>
~~w
o~::;:
~~ ~
;:::~6
o z >-
o ~
~~ ::E
au :::
" ~
QU :::
<~ 3
~~
1il
I
'"
~
:1
.~
o
/22
1
-
i
II
r
~
d
~
~
S
g
~
-
o
roil
YzlH
(-Ill
I 3..r
=i~'1
~:!=i
~i!1
30"11
Sll III
:>(I!II
~
~~
~G
~
'-0
'-O~
~,z
z "'-> '"
i ~~ ~
€'l~ ~ ~ Z
<::) Z ~
o ~
'" ~~::<
~ a~ ~
~ Cl~~
2 <( G ~
~~
<(
!i
:=.",
.~
:1
o
123
r-
-
o
""II
Ozlll
_~;i:
e;!' ~u'l
c:::=>!:s
>iil
~u.1
"'1I1l!
~dl
I ~ ~
~i
0
\.0
\.O='
~z
~ ~'"
~~ V>
0 ~
~ 0::; :::;;
~~ 0
J:
~ ~j z
0
~ Oz >-
0 ~
'" ~~ :::;;
! og <
~
.~ ~ ~
~ -
3=
'"
~~
~
.
II
ffi
.
.=
o
/2~
o
""II
~zl'
~-1S1
" .'
-(~I
~~:!,
'xi
~u,1
" 10
j:..
~ ~ \.0
\.O='
~~
~o V>
~~ ~
o~ :::;;
~~ 0
~ J:
~j Z
0
l'l Oz >-
0 ~
I ~~ :::;;
<
Q~ -
~
Q~ ~
-
<5 3=
~~
<
~
ffi
~~
.
:1
o
CX)1
-
/25
ENVIRONMENTAL
INFORMATION FORM
(Part I - Initial Study)
(Please type or print clearly using ink. Use the tab key to move from one line to the next line.)
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Division
(909) 477-2750
The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed
project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City Policies, Ordinances, and
Guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and
Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this
application be provided in full.
GENERAL INFORMA TlON:
INCOMPLETE APPLlCA TIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. Please note that it is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that
the application is complete at the time of submittal; Cily staff will not be available to perform work required to provide missing
information.
Application Number for the project to which this form pertains: TTM 16882
Project Title: Foothill and Etiwanda
Name & Address of project owner(s):
RC Foothill 998, LLC, A California Limited Liability Company
2155 E. Garvey Avenue North, Suite 6-18, West Covina, CA. 91791
Name & Address of developer or project sponsor:
Lewis Investment Company
1156 N. Mountain Avenue
Upland, CA 91786
Contact Person & Address:
Stacy Lin
(Same address as above)
Name & Address of person preparing this form (if different from above):
Telephone Number: (909) 946-7536
EXHIBIT H
Page 1 019
'\td()/,o
Created on 1n/2005 3:27 PM
/210
PROJECT INFORMA TION & DESCRIPTION:
Information indicated by an asterisk (') is not required of non-construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff.
'1) Provide a full scale (8-1/2 x 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the project site, and indicate
the site boundaries.
2) Provide a set of color photographs that show representative views into the site from the north, south, east and west;
views into and from the site from the primary access points that serve the site; and representative views of
significant features from the site. Include a map showing location of each photograph.
3) Project Location (describe):
Approximately 550 feet east of Etiwanda Ave., on the north side of Foothill
Boulevard.
4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers (attach additional sheet if necessary):
1100-161-04
'5) Gross Site Area (aclsq. It):
9.96 ac / 433,858 SF
'6) Net Site Area (total site size minus area of public streets & proposed
dedications):
9.37 ac /408,157 SF
7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the project site
(attach additional sheet if necessary):
A General Plan Amendment and Development District Amendment are required, from existing Community
Commercial to Medium Density Residential.
8) Include a description of al/ permits which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other
governmental agencies in order to fully implement the project:
NPDES Permit, Rough Grading Permit, Private Sewer and Water Permit, Public Sewer and Water Permit,
Precise Gradin9 and Drainage Permit, Public Street Improvements Permit, Building Permits.
9) Describe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the project including information on topography, soil
stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects. Describe any
existing structures on site (including age and condition) and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of
significant features described. In addition, cite all sources of information (i.e., geological and/or hydrologic studies,
biotic and archeological surveys, traffic studies):
The subject site has areas of dense brush and exposed rock and soil cover types, a portion of which has
been disturbed and graded during previous dirt moving operations adjacent to the site. There are no trees
located on the site. The site topography is relatively even, with grades from flat to 3%, and with high
points at the northerly east and west corners, draining evenly to a low point at the southerly border near
05 01~18 Environmental Part I.DOC
Page 2 of 9
Created on 117120053:27 PM
/27
the southwesterly corner of the project.
A few trails traverse the site, one near the westerly project boundary, one along the full south frontage of
the site (parallel to Foothill), and a third trail along the easterly project boundary. The trails appear to have
been created to facilitate the movement of dirt related to recent adjacent development (apartments to the
north and a regional detention basin to the east). No structures currently exist on the site.
No evidence of animal habitation was obvious, although no formal survey has been conducted.
10) Describe the known cultural and/or historical aspects of the site. Cite all sources of information (books, published
reports and oral history):
There are no known cultural and/or historical aspects related to the subject site.
11) Describe any noise sources and their levels that now affect the site (aircraft, roadway noise, ete.) and how they will
affect proposed uses:
The most significant noice source currently at the project is generated by traffic on Foothill Blvd.
The site will need to be laid out and designed in order to reduce the impact traffic noise will have on the
development, including setbacks, grade separation and walls.
12) Describe the proposed project in detail. This should provide an adequate description of the site in terms of ultimate
use that will result from the proposed project. Indicate if there" are proposed phases for development, the extent of
development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment. Attach additional sheet(s)
if necessary:
The proposed project will consist of 99 condominum units in 33 3-plex buildings.
The site will be accessed by two gated entries at either end of the project on Foothill Blvd.
Driveways and sidewalks will convey vehicular and pedestrian traffic though the site. Open space will
be maintained in and around the buildings, and a common recreational center will also be provided.
The project is expected to be phased, with 4 approximately equal divisions. Completion of the phases
is anticipated to be sequential and continuous from start to finish of all phased construction.
0501.18 Environmental Part l.DOC
Page 3 of9
Created on 1/7/20053:27 PM
J2CO
13) Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or
scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc), intensily of land use (one-family,
apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc) and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard,
etc):
Adjacent to the north is an existing apartment complex. Vacant land and a convenience store are
adjacent west, and a interim regional detention basin is to the east. Foothill Blvd borders the south side
of the project, with an existing single-family residential project and vacant land across to the south.
Vacant land is similar to the subject site, with a mix of brush, barren land, a few trees, and a network of
trails and drainage courses.
14) Will the proposed project change the pattern, scale or character of the surrounding general area of the project?
The residential use of the site is similar to adjacent uses, lower density than the development to the north,
and slightly higher density than existing development to the south.
15) Indicate the type of short-term and long-term noise to be generated, including source and amount. How will these
noise levels affect adjacent properties and on-site uses. What methods of soundproofing are proposed?
Short-term noise will be generated durin9 construction from various machinery and tools. Construction
will be limited to standard working hours, and therefore the impact to adjacent properties should be
limited.
Long-term noise will be generated by residential traffic, which is consistant with existing projects, and will
only slightly increase the volume on Foothill. Impact should be minimal and typical for the type of use.
*16) Ind;cate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees:
There are no existing trees on the site.
17) Indicate any bodies of water (including domestic water supplies) into which the site drains:
The subject site currently surface drains to Foothilll Boulevard.
0501-18 Environmental Part I.DOC
Page 4 of 9
Created on 1/7/20053:27 PM
/2q
18) Indicate expected amount of water usage. (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification, please
contact the Cucamonga County Water District at 987-2591.
a. Residential (gal/day) 39,600.00
Peak use (gal/Day) 79.200.00
b. Commercial/Ind. (gal/day/ac)
19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal.
Peak use (gal/min/ac)
o Septic Tank
IS! Sewer.
If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests. If discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate
expected daily sewage generation: (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification, please contact
the Cucamonga County Water District at 987-2591.
a. Residential (gal/day)
19,800.00
b. Commercial/Industrial (gal/day/ac)
RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS:
20) Number of residential units: 99
Detached (indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size:
Attached (indicate whether units are rental or for sale units):
99 for-sale condominum units
21) Anticipated range of sale prices and/or rents:
Sale Price(s)
$300,000.00
to $350,000
Rent (per month) $
to $
22) Specify number of bedrooms by unit type:
Plan 1 - 2 bedroom
Plan 2 - 3 bedroom
Plan 3 - 3 bedroom plus den/optional bed 4
23) Indicate anticipated household size by unit type:
All units are expected to house between 1 and 5 people, averaging plus or minus 3 per unit.
0501-18 Environmental Part I.DOC
Page 5 of9
Created on 1/7/20053:27 PM
/;; D
24) Indicate the expected number of school children who will be residing within the project: Contact the appropriate
School Districts as shown in Attachment B:
a. Elementary: 18
b. Junior High: Q
c. Senior High Z
COMMERCIAL. INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS
25) Describe type of users) and major function(s) of commercial, industrial or institutional uses:
26) Total floor area of commercial, industrial, or institutional uses by type:
27) Indicate hours of operation:
28) Number of employees:
Total:
Maximum Shift:
Time of Maximum Shift:
29) Provide breakdown of anticipated job classifications, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an indication of the
rate of hire for each classification (attach additional sheet if necessary):
30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside in the
City:
'31) For commercial and industrial uses only, indicate the source, type and amount of air pollution emissions. (Data should
be verified through the South Coast Air Quality Management District, at (818) 572-6283):
0501-18 Environmental Part I.ooe
Page 6 of 9
Created on 1/7/20053:27 PM
13 )
ALL PROJECTS
32) Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies serving the project been contacted to determine their ability to
provide adequate service to the proposed project? If so, please indicate their response.
CVWD has been contacted regarding sewer and water service. Both sewer and water will require limited off-
site extensions, however connection and service should not be a problem. Fire will review the site plan and
make any comments necessary to ensure adequate service. The site is within the Etiwanda master plan of
storm drainage, and two options are available; connection to a drain in Foothill, and connection to an existing
detention basin adjacent east of the subject site.
33) In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic
materials? Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include, but are not limited to PCB's; radioactive substances;
pesticides and herbicides; fuels, oils, solvents, and other flammable liquids and gases. Also note underground storage
of any of the above. Please list the materials and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well
as the dates of use, if known.
There have been no known storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials on the site.
34) Will the proposed project involve the temporary or Jong.term use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic
materials, including but not limited to those examples listed above? If yes, provide an inventory of all such materials to
be used and proposed method of disposal. The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall
be shown and labeled on the application plans.
The project will not involve the temporary or long-term use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic
materials.
I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for
adequate evaluation of this project to the best of my ability, that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct
tot he best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an
adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. ~
Date: 1/18/2005 Signature: ~ ""
Title: Assistant Project Manager
0501-18 Environmental Part I.OOC
Page 7 of9
Created on 117120053:27 PM
/3)"
ATTACHMENT A
Water UsaQe
Average use per day
Residential
Sin91e Family
Apt/Condo
600 gal/day
400 gal/day
Commercialllndustrial
General and Regional Commercial
Neighborhood Commercial
General Industrial
Industrial Park
3,000 gal/day/ac
1,500 gal/day/ac
2,500 gal/day/ac
3,000 gal/day/ac
Peak Usage
For all uses
Average use x 2.0
Sewer Flows
Residential
Single Family
Apt/Condos
270 gal/day
200 gal/day
Commercial/Industrial
General Commercial
Nei9hborhood Commercial
General Industrial
Heavy Industrial
2,000 gal/day/ac
1,000 gal/day/ac
1,500 gal/day/ac
3,000 gal/day/ac
Source: Cucamonga County Water District Master Plan, 6/00
0501-18 Environmental Part I.DOC
Page 8 of 9
Crealed on 1/7/20053:27 PM
/33
ATTACHMENT B
Contact the school district for your area for amount and payment of school fees:
Elementary School Districts
Alta Loma
9350 Base Line Road, Suite F
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
(909) 987-0766
Central
10601 Church Street, Suite 112
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
(909) 989-8541
Cucamonga
8776 Archibald Avenue
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
(909) 987-8942
Etiwanda
5959 East Avenue
P.O. Box 248
Rancho Cucamon9a, CA 91739
(909) 899-2451
High School
Chaffey High School
211 West 5th Street
Ontario, CA 91762
(909) 988-8511
0501-18 Environmental Part I.DOC
Page 9 of 9
Created on 1/7/20053:27 PM 13 t.J
AMADOR ON ROUTE 66
SUBTT 16882, DRC2004-00268
/35
City of Rancho Cucamonga
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
INITIAL STUDY PART II
BACKGROUND
1, Project File: General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00269, Development District Amendment
DRC2004-00270, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16882, and Development Review DRC2004-00268.
2, Related Files: None
3, Description of Project: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2004-00269 - LEWIS
INVESTMENT COMPANY - A request to change the land use designation from Community
Commercial to Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) on 9.68 acres on the north side of
Foothill Boulevard, east of Etiwanda Avenue - APN: 1100-161-04.
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2004-00270 - LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY -
A request to change the zoning designation from Community Commercial to Medium Residential
(8-14 dwelling units per acre) within the Foothill Boulevard Districts on 9.68 acres on the north side
of Foothill Boulevard, east of Etiwanda Avenue - APN: 1100-161-04.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16882 - LEWIS
INVESTMENT COMPANY - A request for a seven numbered and two lettered lot subdivision of
9.68 acres for 99 condominiums on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, east of Etiwanda Avenue.
APN: 1100-161-04.
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00268 - LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY - A request to
develop 99 condominiums on 9.68 net acres within the Community Commercial land use
designation of the Foothill Boulevard Districts on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, east of
Etiwanda Avenue - APN: 1100-161-04.
4. General Plan Designation: Community Commercial (Existing), Medium Density (Requested)
5. Zoning: Community Commercial within the Foothill Boulevard Districts (Existing), Medium Density
(Requested)
6, Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: Developed Medium Density apartments to the north,
vacant Office-Commercial to the east, single-family Low Density across Foothill Boulevard to the
south, and underutilized commercial and residential uses zoned Community Commercial to the
west.
7. Lead Agency Name and Address:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Department
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
8. Contact Person and Phone Number:
Larry Henderson, AICP, Principal Planner
(909) 477-2750
9.
Other agencies whose approval is required (e,g., permits, financing approval, or
participation agreement): Cucamonga Valley Water District , San Bernardino County Fire
District, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and Regional Water Quality Control Board.
130
Initial Study for Ci1y of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2004-00269, DRC2004-00270, SUBTT16882, DRC2004-00268 Page 2
GLOSSARY - The following abbreviations are used in this report:
CVWD - Cucamonga Valley Water District
EIR - Environmental Impact Report
FEIR - Final Environmental Impact Report
NPDES - National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
NOx - Nitrogen Oxides
ROG - Reactive Organic Gases
PM10 - Fine Particulate Matter
RWQCB - Regional Water Quality Control Board
SCAQMD - South Coast Air Quali1y Management District
SWPPP - Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
URBEMIS7G - Urban Emissions Model 7G
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least
one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation
Incorporated," or "Less-Than-Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages,
( ) Aesthetics
( ) Biological Resources
( ) Hazards & Waste Materials
( ) Mineral Resources
(X) Public Services
X Utilities & Service S stems
(X) Air Quality
( ) Geology & Soils
(X) Land Use & Planning
(X) Population & Housing
(X) TransportationfTraffic
DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
(X) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there
will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by, or
agreed to, by the projec r onent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
D'''1z /0 ?
Date: - g.- oj
Prepared By:
Reviewed By:
/37
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2004-00269, DRC2004-00270, SUBTT16882, DRC2004-00268 Page 3
Issues and Supporting Information Sources:
Potentially
Significant
I act
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Inco orated
Leo,
Than
Significant
I act
No
1m act
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
1, AESTHETICS. Would the project: () () () V)
a) Have a substantial affect a scenic vista?
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not () () () (,f)
limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings
within a State Scenic Highway? .
c) Substantiaily degrade the existing visual character or () () () (,f)
quality of the site and its surroundings?
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which () () (,f) ()
would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the
area?
Comments:
a) There are no significant vistas within or adjacent to the project site. The site is not within a
view corridor according to General Plan Exhibit 111-15.
b) The project site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic
Highway. There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
c) The site is located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard approximately 500 feet east of
Etiwanda Avenue and is characterized by developed Medium Residential density apartments
to the north, vacant Office/Commercial to the east, single-family Low Density across Foothill
Boulevard to the south, and underutilized commercial and residential uses zoned Community
Commercial to the west. The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this
project. Design review is required prior to approval. City standards require the developer to
underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of
overhead utility lines and utility enciosures in accordance with Planning Commission
Resolution No. 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution.
d) The project would increase the number of streetlights and security lighting used in the
immediate vicinity. The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on the Site Plans
which require review for consistency with City standards that requires shielding, diffusing, or
indirect lighting to avoid glare. Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of
iilumination to within the project site. The impact is not considered significant.
2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland
of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the
maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and
Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency,
to non-agricultural use?
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a
Williamson Act contract?
()
()
()
(,I)
()
()
()
V)
13 Y'
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2004-00269, DRC2004-00270, SUBTT16882, DRC2004-00268 Page 4
Issues and Supporting Information Sources:
Less Than
Significant l",
Potentially With Th""
Significant Mitigation Significant No
I act Inco orated 1m act 1m act
() () () (,f)
c) Involve other changes in the existing environment, which,
due to their location or nature, could result in conversion
of Farmland, to non-agricultural use?
Comments:
a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide
Importance. The site is located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard approximately 500
feet east of Etiwanda Avenue and is characterized by developed Medium Density apartments
to the' north, vacant Office/Commercial to the east, single-family Low Density across Foothill
Boulevard to the south, and underutilized commercial and residential uses zoned Community
Commercial to the west. There are approximately 1,300 acres of Prime Farmlands, Unique
Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, of
which about one-third is either developed or committed to development according to General
Plan Table IV-2. The major concentrations of designated farmlands are located in the
southern and eastern portions of our City that is characterized by existing and planned
development. Further, two-thirds of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from
3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful; therefore, they are not intended
to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan. The General Plan FEIR
identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse
impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City
Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was
prepared and impacts evaluated,
b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, There are no
Williamson Act contracts within the City,
c) The site is located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard approximately 500 feet east of
Etiwanda Avenue and is characterized by developed Medium Density apartments to the
north, vacant Office/Commercial to the east, single-family Low Density across Foothill
Boulevard to the south, and underutilized commercial and residential uses zoned Community
Commercial to the west. The nearest agricultural use is more than 1.08 mile northwest from
the project site. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated.
3, AIR QUALITY, Would the project: () () () (v')
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the
applicable air quality plan?
b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially () (v') () ()
to an existing or projected air quality violation?
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any () () () (v')
criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-
attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient
air quality standard (including releasing emissions that
exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors?
d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant () (v') () ()
concentrations?
I :d1
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2004-00269, DRC2004-00270, SUBTT16882, DRC2004-00268 Page 5
Issues and Supporting Information Sources:
Less Than
Significant ""
Potentially With Thoo
Significant Mitigation Significant No
I~act Inco';""'rated I~nact lmnact
() () () (v")
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number
of people?
Comments:
a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.6), continued development will contribute to the
pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State
standards. The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a
significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations
was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the
General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated.
b) During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty
construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions,
In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities.
While most of the dust would settle on or near the project site, smaller particles would remain
in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area. Construction is an
on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area. Construction workers and equipment
work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete. They then transfer
to a different site where the process begins again, Therefore, the emissions associated with
construction activities are not new to the Rancho Cucamonga area and would not violate an
air quality standard or worsen the existing air quality in the region, Nevertheless, fugitive
dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality
Management District (SCAQMD) on a project-specific basis. Therefore, the following
mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels:
1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so
as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all
construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per
manufacturers' specifications, Maintenance records shall be available at the
construction site for City verification,
2) Prior to the issuance of any Grading Permits, the developer shall submit
Construction Plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected
equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that
low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use
was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall
also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air
Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff,
3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in
SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or
high-volume, low-pressure spray.
4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule
1108,
5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403;
Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions:
1'-1D
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2004-00269, DRC2004-00270, SUBTT16882, DRC2004-00268 Page 6
Issues and Supporting Information Sources:
Potentially
Significant
I-;"""act
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Inco";:;orated
Less
Than
Significant
I~act
No
Imnact
. Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and
watering.
. Pave or apply gravel to anyon-site haul roads,
. Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over
extended periods of time,
. Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil
during and after the end of work periods.
. Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances
and use sound engineering practices.
. Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is
carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of
hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction.
. Suspend grading operations during high winds (I.e" wind speeds
exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements.
. Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or coller
payloads using tarps or other suitable means,
6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by
SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce
Particulate Matter (PM1.) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403,
7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to
all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to
reduce PM,. emissions,
8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative
fuel-powered equipment where feasible.
9) The construction contractor shall ensure that Construction Grading Plans
include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use,
After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, short-term construction air quality
emissions would remain significant as noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.6). Based
upon the Urban Emissions Model 7G URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5,6-4 of the
General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR), Nitrogen Oxides (Nox). Reactive
Organic Gases (ROG), and Particulate Matter (PM,.) would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for
significance; therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a
project basis to a level less-than-significant. The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide
increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of
Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council.
In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in significant
operational vehicle emissions based upon the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5,6-4
of the General Plan FEIR; therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be
/4)
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2004-00269, DRC2004-00270, SUBTT16882, DRC2004-00268 Page 7
Issues and Supporting Information Sources:
Potentially
Significant
lmoacl
less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incoroorated
L'"
Than
Significant
lmoae!
No
lmoact
mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant. The following mitigation
measures shall be implemented:
10) AU residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate
high-efficiencyllow-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water
heaters.
11) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate
thermal pane windows and weather-stripping.
After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FEIR identified
the citywide increase in operational emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for
which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council.
c) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.6) continued development would contribute to
the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State
standards. The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a
significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was
ultimately adopted by the City Council. The project proposed is consistent with the General
Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated.
d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of
pollution than the population at large. The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive
receptors: long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers,
retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities.
According to the SCAQMD, projects have the potential to create significant impacts if they
are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants
identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401. The project site is located within 1/4 mile of a sensitive
receptor: residences adjoining to the north. Potential impacts to air quality are consistent
with the Public Health and Safety Super-Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General
Plan. During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from
grading the site. rhe mitigation measures listed under b) above will reduce impact to less-
than-significant levels.
e) Typically, the uses proposed do not create objectionable odors. No adverse impacts are
anticipated.
f) LSA Associates, Inc. prepared an Air Quality Impact Analysis for the project (Air Study),
which is available for review in the project file in the Planning Department. The Air Study was
completed in accordance with the South Coast Air Quality Management District's (SCAQMD)
CEQA Air Quality Handbook. The Air Study concluded that the impacts associated with the
project are less-than-significant.
/'11
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2004-00269, DRC2004-00270, SUBTT16882, DRC2004-00268 Page 8
Issues and Supporting Information Sources:
Potentially
Significant
I "
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Inco orated
L..,
Than
Significant
1m '"
No
1m act
4, BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: () () () (v')
a) Have a substantiai adverse effect, either directly or
through habitat modifications, on any species identified
as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in
local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the
California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service?
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat or () () () (,,)
other sensitive natural community identified in local or
regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California
Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife
Service?
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected () () () (,,)
wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool,
coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological
interruption, or other means?
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native () () () (,,)
resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with
established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors,
or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting () () () (,,)
biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or
ordinance?
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat () () () (,,)
Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation
Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat
conservation plan?
Comments:
a) The project site is located in an area developed with residential, commercial, and utility uses.
The site has been previously disrupted during construction of infrastructure and surrounding
developments as well as annual discing for weed abatement. According to the General Plan
Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5.3 of the General Plan FEIR, the project site is not within an area
of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or
endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by
urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan.
b) The project site is located in an urban area with no natural communities. No riparian habitat
exists on-site, meaning the project will not have any impacts.
c) No wetland habitat is present on-site. As a result, project implementation would have no
impact on these resources.
d) The majority of the surrounding area has been or is being developed, thereby disrupting any
wildlife corridors that may have existed. No adverse Impacts are anticipated.
J43
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2004-00269, DRC2004-00270, SUBTT16882, DRC2004-00268 Page 9
Issues and Supporting Information Sources:
Potentially
Significant
1m oct
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Inca orated
,,,'
Thoo
Significant
1m act
No
r act
e) There are no heritage trees on the project site; therefore, the proposed project is not in
conflict with any local ordinance.
f) The project site is not located within a conservation area according to the General Plan,
Open Space and Conservation Plan, Exhibit IV-4. No conflicts with habitat conservation
plans will occur.
5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: () () () V)
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance
of a historical resource as defined in ~ 15064.5?
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance () (.r) () ()
of an archeological resource pursuant to ~ 15064.5?
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological () (.r) () ()
resource or site or unique geologic feature?
d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred () () () (.r)
outside of formal cemeteries?
Comments:
a) The project site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho
Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2,24 (Historic Preservation), There will be no impact.
b) There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the project site; however,
the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans
according to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.11). Construction activity, particularly
grading, soil excavation, and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and
potential archaeological resources. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented:
1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during
grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor
construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them
for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho
Cucamonga will:
. Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or
significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its
archaeological value.
. Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological
sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or
focal point.
. Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage,
. Propose mitigation measures and recommend Conditions of Approval to
eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique
prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines.
I Z/ '-/
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2004-00269, DRC2004-00270, SUBTT16882, DRC2004-00268 Page 10
Issues and Supporting Information Sources:
Potentially
Significant
J-;"""act
less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Jnco~raled
Leso
Than
Significant
I~nact
No
Imnact
. Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the
inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the
project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original
illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information
Center for permanent archiving.
c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5.11) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an
alluvial fan. According to the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or
resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the sphere-of-
influence, including the project site; however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for
paleontological resources. The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the
wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of
the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance ot modern man occurred,
may contain significant vertebrate fossils. The project site is underlain by Quaternary
alluvium per General Plan Exhibit V-2; therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be
implemented:
2) If any paleontological resource (I.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered
before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to
monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or
preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings
that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation
measures (i,e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate, Where
mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be
limited to, the following measures:
. Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid
removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time
during the interval of earth-disturbing activities.
. Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert
earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed
salvage, If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading
contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor
of the find.
. Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer
collected specimens with a copy of the report to the San Bernardino
County Museum.
d) The proposed project is in an area that has already been disturbed by development. The
project site has already been disrupted by construction of infrastructure and surrounding
developments as well as annual discing for weed abatement. No known religious or sacred
sites exist within the project area. No evidence is in place to suggest the project site has
been used for human burials. The California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050.5) states
that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the
County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public
Resources Code Section 5097.98. As adherence to State regulations is required for all
development, no miti9ation is required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered
on-site, No adverse impacts are anticipated.
/45
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2004-00269, DRC2004-00270, SUBTT16882, DRC2004-00268 Page 11
Issues and Supporting Information Sources:
Potentially
Significant
I ,,"
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Inca orated
c,'"
Than
Significant
I ,,'
No
1m act
6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS, Would the project
a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial
adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death
involving: .
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated () () () (v")
on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault
Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the
area or based on other substantial evidence of a
known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and
Geology Special Publication 42.
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? () () () (v")
iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including () () () (v")
liquefaction?
iv) Landslides? () () () (v")
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoii? () (v") () ()
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or () () () (v")
that would become unstable as a result of the project,
and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral
spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B () () () (v")
of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial
risks to life or property?
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of () () () (v")
septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems
where sewers are not available for the disposal of
wastewater?
Comments:
a) No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in
the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the
General Plan Exhibit V-1, and Section 5.1 of the General Plan FEIR. The Red Hill Fault,
passes within 2.7 miles northwest of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies
approximately 4.03 miles north. These faults are both capable of producing Mw 6.0-7,0
earthquakes. Also, the San Jacinto Fault, capable of producing up to Mw 7.5 earthquakes is
15 miles northeasterly of the site and the San Andreas, capable of up to Mw 8.2 earthquakes,
is 17 miles northeasterly of the site, Each of these faults can produce strong groundshaking.
Adhering to the Uniform Building Code will ensure that geologic impacts are
less-than-significant.
The proposed project will require the excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on-site
soils. The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during
September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems.
Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting
JLJIo
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2004-00269, DRC2004-00270, SUBTT16882, DRC2004-00268 Page 12
Issues and Supporting Information Sources:
Potentially
Significant
I aot
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Inco orated
less
Tha,
Signilicant
1m acl
No
1m acl
in temporary problems of dust control; however, development of this project under the
General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads,
buildings, and landscaping are established. Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation
measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significantlevels:
1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by
SCAQMD and RWQCS) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with
SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as
possible,
2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by
the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-
site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction.
3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to
minimize PM10 emissions from the site during such episodes,
4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCS) shall be applied to
all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to
reduce PM,o emissions.
c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5.1) indicates that subsidence is generally associated with
large decreases or withdrawals of water from the aquifer. The project would not withdraw
water from the existing aquifer. The site is not within a geotechnical hazardous area or other
unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FEIR Figure 5.1-2. Soil types
on-site consist of TvB Soil association according to General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5.1-3. No
adverse impacts are anticipated.
d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the project site, is located on alluvial soil
deposits. These types of soils are not considered to be expansive. Soil types on-site consist
of TvB Soil association according to General Plan Exhibit V-3 and General Plan FEIR Exhibit
5.1-3, These soils are typically Loamy Sand, No adverse impacts are anticipated.
e) The project will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater
disposal. No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed.
7, HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS, Would the project: () () () V)
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through the routine transport, use, or
disposal of hazardous materials?
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (,()
environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and
accident conditions involving the release of hazardous
materials into the environment?
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or () () () (,{)
acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within
1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school?
/41
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2004-00269, DRC2004-00270, SUBTT16882, DRC2004-00268 Page 13
Issues and Supporting Information Sources:
Potentially
Significant
I ct
less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
lnco orated
L,,,,
Than
Significant
I act
No
I act
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of () () () ("')
hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to
Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result,
would it create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment?
e) For a project located within an airport iand use plan or, () () () ("')
where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles
of a public airport or public use airport, would the project
result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in
the project area?
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would () () () ("')
the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or
working in the project area?
g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an () () () ("')
adopted emergency response plan or emergency
evacuation plan?
h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, () () () ("')
injury or death involving wildland fires, including where
wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where
residences are intermixed with wildlands?
Comments:
a) The project will not involve the transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials, The City
participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous
Materials Division that is more comprehensive that any other in the state. The City has
adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to
respond to chemical emergencies. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations
concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the
potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant. No adverse impacts are
expected.
b) The proposed project does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels. The
City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service
Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the state. The
City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional
Plan to respond to chemical emergencies. Compliance with Federal, State, and local
regulations concernin.g the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels wiil
reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant. No adverse
impacts are anticipated.
c) There are no schools located within 1/4 mile of the project site. The project site is located
within .7 mile of the nearest existing or proposed school.
d) The proposed project is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site. Recent
site inspection did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of
hazardous materials. No impact is anticipated.
/ if ~
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2004-00269, DRC2004-00270, SUBTT16882, DRC2004-00268 Page 14
Issues and Supporting Information Sources:
Potentially
Significant
I ,ct
less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Inco orated
L~,
Than
Significant
1m act
No
1m acl
e) The site is not located within an Airport Land Use Plan and is not within 2 miles of a public
airport. The project site is located approximately 4 1/2 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport
and is offset north of the flight path. No impact is anticipated.
f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of
the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated,
g) The City's Multi-Hazard Disaster Plan, which is updated every two years, includes policies
and procedures to be administered by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District in the event of a
disaster. Because the project includes at least two points of public street access and is
required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse
impacts are anticipated.
h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from a wind-driven fire in the Urban
Wildland Interface area found in the northern part of the City according to the Fire District
Strategic Plan 2000-2005; however, the proposed project site is not located within a high fire
hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-7.
8, HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: () () (.f) ()
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge
requirements?
b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere () () () (.f)
substantially with groundwater recharge such that there
would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of
the local groundwater tabie level (e.g., the production rate
of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a levei which
would not support existing land uses or planned uses for
which permits have been granted)?
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site () () () (.f)
or area, including through the alteration of the course of a
stream or river, in a manner, which would result in
substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site?
d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site () () () (.f)
or area, including through the alteration of the course of a
stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or
amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result
in flooding on- or off-site?
e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the () () () (.f)
capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage
systems or provide substantial additional sources of
polluted runoff?
f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? () () () (.f)
g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as () () () (.f)
mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood
Insurance Rate Map or other fiood hazard delineation
map?
tLff
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2004-00269, DRC2004-00270, SUBTT16882, DRC2004-00268 Page 15
Less Than
Significant L'"
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than
Significant MitIgation Significant No
I~act IncorOoraled I-mnact r~~cl
h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures that () () () (v")
would impede or redirect flood flows?
i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, () () () (v")
injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a
result of the failure of a levee or dam?
j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? () () () (v")
Comments:
a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CYWD). The
project is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems. The State of California
is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Eiimination
System (NPDES) permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act. The General
Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an industrial activity,
requiring a permit under the State's Generai NPDES permit. The State Water Resource
Control Board (SWRCB), through the Regionai Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB),
Santa Ana Region, administers these permits.
Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction Permit include
removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or
significant redevelopment. Prior to commencement of construction of a project, a discharger
must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General Permit. The
General Permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction
activities, including site clearance and grading:
. Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that would
specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) that would prevent construction pollutants
from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from
moving off-site into receiving waters,
. Eliminate or reduce non-storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other
waters of the nation.
. Perform inspections of all BMPs.
Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction project discharges. A
construction project for new development or significant redevelopment requires an NPDES
permit. Construction project proponents are required to prepare a SWPPP. To comply with
the N PDES, the construction contractor of the project will be required to prepare a SW PPP
during construction activities, and a Water Quaiity Management Plan (WQMP) for post-
construction operational management of storm water runoff. The applicant has submitted a
WQMP, prepared by Madole and Associates dated January 14, 2005, that identifies BMPs to
minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils, entering the drainage system after
construction. Runoff from driveways, roads, and other impermeable surfaces must be
controlled through an on-site drainage system. BMPs include both structural and non-
structural control methods. Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels
include detention basins, oiVgrit separators, and porous pavement. Non-structural controls
focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing Erosion and
Sediment Control Plans, and various business plans that must be developed by any
/50
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2004-00269, DRC2004-00270, SUBTT16882, DRC2004-00268 Page 16
Issues and Supporting Information Sources:
Potentially
Significant
I~Dact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incoroorated
L'"
TO.,
Significant
lmoact
No
lmoact
businesses that store and use hazardous materials. Practices, such as periodic parking lot
sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system.
The following mitigation measures would be required to control additional storm water
effluent:
Construction Activities:
1) Prior to issuance of Grading Permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the
Building Official for approval a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)
specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-
site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain
system to the maximum extent practical.
2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and
implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control
on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are
initiated through completion of grading, This Erosion Control Plan shall include
the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and
construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern
California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to
ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of
this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program
within a specified time frame,
3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must
be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is
rainfall or other runoff,
4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed
prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to
prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site,
Post- Construction Operational:
5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality
Management Plan (WQMP) prepared by Madole and Associates, dated
January 14, 2005, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm
drain system to the maximum extent practical,
6) Landscaping Plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the
use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides, Landscaped areas shall be monitored
and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable
growth, Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of
two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the
issuance of Grading Permits.
b) According to CVWD, 43 percent of the City's water is currently provided from groundwater in
the Cucamonga and Chino Basins. CVWD has adopted a master plan that estimates
demand needs until the year 2030. The proposed project will not deplete groundwater
supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a
recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Exhibit IV-2. The
/5)
Ini1ial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2004-00269, DRC2004-00270, SUBTT16882, DRC2004-00268 Page 17
Issues and Supporting Information Sources:
Potentially
Significant
I~act
LsssThan
Significant
With
Mitigation
IncorPorated
L'M
Thao
Significant
'''''''''
Nu
Imnact
development of the site will require the grading of the site and excavation; however, would
not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 288 to 470 feet below the ground
surface. As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.9), continued development citywide
will increase water needs and is a significant impact; however, CVWD has plans to meet this
increased need through the construction of future water facilities,
c) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and
amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape
proposed on a site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river, All
runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle
the flows. The project design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent
erosion. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City
Engineer prior to issuance of Grading Permits, Therefore, the project will not result in
substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site. The impact is not considered significant.
d) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and
amount of s.urface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape
proposed on a site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All
runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle
the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City
Engineer prior to issuance of Grading Permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will
not result in flooding on- or off-site. No impacts are anticipated.
e) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and
amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape
proposed on a site; however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities,
which have been designed to handle the flows. The project will not result in substantial
additional sources of polluted runoff. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the
Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of Grading Permits. Therefore, increase
in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. No impacts are anticipated.
f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase
in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus
resulting in surface water quality impacts. The site is for new development or significant
redevelopment; therefore, is required to comply with the NPDES to minimize water pollution.
The following mitigation measures shall be implemented:
7) Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall submit to the City
Engineer for approval of a WOMP, including a project description and identifying
BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system
to the maximum extent practicable. The WOMP shall identify the structural and
non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development
and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004.
8) Prior to issuance of Grading or Paving Permits, the applicant shall obtain a
Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm
Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this
has been obtained (i.e" a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number)
shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES
General Construction Permit.
/52
Ini1ial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2004-00269, DRC2004-00270, SUBTT16882, DRC2004-00268 Page 18
Issues and Supporting Information Sources:
Potentially
Significant
1m act
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Inco rated
L'"
Thoo
Significant"
I aCI
No
I ,ct
g) The project site is not located within a 1 OO-year flood hazard area according to General Plan
Exhibit V-5. No adverse Impacts are expected,
h) The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan
Exhibit V-5. No adverse impacts are expected.
i) The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system
designed to convey a 100-year storm event. The system is substantially improved and
provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows. This existing system
includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined
channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Exhibit V-6. The project
site is not located within a 1 aO-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5.
No adverse impacts are expected,
j) There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the project site; therefore, impacts from seiche
and tsunami are not anticipated. The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep
eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams.
Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the
level of non-significance within the City. This existing system includes several debris dams
and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City.
9, LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: () () () (v")
a) Physically divide an established community?
b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or () () () (v")
regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project
(including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan,
local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for
the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental
effect?
c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or () () () (v")
natural community conservation plan?
Comments:
a) The site is located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard approximately 50a feet east of
Etiwanda Avenue and is characterized by Developed Medium Density apartments to the
north, vacant Office-Commercial to the east, single-family Low Density across Foothill
Boulevard to the south, and underutilized commercial and residential uses zoned Community
Commercial to the west. This project will be of similar design and size to neighboring
apartment development to the north. The project will become a part of the larger community.
No adverse impacts are anticipated,
b) The project site land use designation is currently Community Commercial with Medium
Density Residential proposed. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and
does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection, As such, no. impacts are
anticipated.
153
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2004-00269, DRC2004-00270, SUBTT16882, DRC2004-00268 Page 19
Issues and Supporting Information Sources:
Potentially
Significant
I act
less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Inca orated
L..,
Than
Significant
I act
No
1m act
c) The project site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area.
According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5.3 of the General Plan FEIR, the
project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development will
not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that
the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan
Land Use Plan.
10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: () () () (v")
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral
resource that would be of value to the region and the
residents of the State?
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important () () () (v")
mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local
general plan, specific plan or other land use plan?
Comments:
a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City
General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1; therefore, there is no impact.
b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, as a valuable
mineral resource recovery site; therefore, there is no impact.
11, NOISE. Would the project result in: () (v') () ()
a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in
excess of standards established in the local general plan
or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other
agencies?
b) Exposure. of persons to or generation of excessive () () () (v")
ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels?
c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels () () () (v")
in the project vicinity above levels existing without the
project?
d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient () (v') () ()
noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing
without the project?
e) For a prcject located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (v')
where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles
of a public airport or public use airport, would the project
expose people residing or working in the project area to
excessive noise levels?
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would () () () (v')
the project expose people residing or working in the
project area to excessive noise levels?
/5'-/
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2004-00269, DRC2004-00270, SUBTT16882, DRC2004-00268 Page 20
Issues and Supporting Information Sources:
Potentially
Si9~~~Canl
1m act
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Inc~.~;ated
L'"
Than
Signillcant
Imoacl
No
r"';~~ct
Comments:
a) The project site is within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to
General Plan Exhibit V-13 at build-out. A Noise Impact Analysis was prepared by LSA
Associates, Inc, dated November 23, 2004. The Noise Study concludes the mitigation
measures listed below would reduce exterior and interior noise levels to less-than-significant
levels:
1) A 12-foot sound wall along the southern boundary of the project along Foothill
Boulevard is required. This sound wall can consist of berms and concrete
masonry units.
2) A sound wall along the western boundary of the project with height gradually
decreasing from 12 feet near Foothill Boulevard to 8 feet near the internal
driveway is required,
3) An air conditioning system for all dwelling units with direct line-of-sight to
Foothill Boulevard traffic is required.
4) Building fa~ade enhancements or upgrades, such as double-paned windows
with a minimum sound transmission class (STC) of STC-32, are required for all
dwelling units in the southern most row of buildings along Foothill Boulevard,
5) A 5-foot sound wall along the southern balcony perimeter is required for all
dwelling units in the southernmost row of buildings with balconies exposed to
Foothill Boulevard traffic. The sound wall can be constructed with a
combination of wood and plexiglass, with no gaps.
b) The uses associated with this type of project normally do not induce ground borne vibrations,
As such, no impacts are anticipated.
c) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic. The proposed
activities will not significantly increase traffic; hence, are not anticipated to increase the
ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the project.
d) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5.7) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site
stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will
generate noise exceeding City standards. The following measures are provided to mitigate
the short-term noise impacts:
6) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m, and
6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday. or at any time on Sunday or a
national holiday.
7) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in
Development Code Section 17.02.120-0, as measured at the property line. The
developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as
specified in Development Code Section 17,02.120. Monitoring at other times may
be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to
the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above
standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If
155
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2004-00269, DRC2004-00270, SUBTT16882, DRC2004-00268 Page 21
Issues and Supporting Information Sources:
Potentially
Significant
1m act
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Inco orated
less
Than
Significant
I act
No
I acl
noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be
reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise .standards or
halted.
8) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase.
The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site
construction equipment; however, do not address the potential impacts because of the
transport of construction materials and debris, The following mitigation measures shall then
be required:
9) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m, and 6:30
a,m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national
holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily
trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall
prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To
the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive
land uses or residential dwellings, .
e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public
airport, The project site is located approximately 4 1/2 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport
and is offset north of the liight path. No impact is anticipated.
f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of
the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated.
.
12, POPULATION AND HOUSING, Would the project: () () () (v")
a) Induce substantial population grow1h in an area, either
directly (for example, by proposing new homes and
businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension
of roads or other infrastructure)?
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, () () () (,f)
necessitating the construction of replacement housing
elsewhere?
c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the () () () (,f)
construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
Comments:
a) The project is located in a predominantly developed area and will not induce substantial
population grow1h. Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract
new employees to the area. No impacts are anticipated,
b) The project site contains no existing housing units. No adverse impact expected.
c) The project site is vacant land. No impacts are anticipated.
j5b
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2004-00269, DRC2004-00270, SUBTT16882, DRC2004-00268 Page 22
Issues and Supporting Information Sources:
Potenlial1y
Significant
I act
less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Inco orated
less
Thao
Significant
I act
No
I act
13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in
substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the
provision of new or physically altered governmental
facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental
facilities, the construction of which could cause significant
environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable
service ratios, response times or other performance () () () (v')
objectives for any of the public services:
a) Fire protection?
b) Police protection? () () () (v')
c) Schools? () () () (v')
d) Parks? () () () (,()
e) Other public facilities? () () () (,()
Comments:
a) The site, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard approximately 500 feet east of
Etiwanda Avenue, would be served by a fire station located approximately 1.4 mile from the
project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of
any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need
to construct new facilities. Standard Conditions of Approval from the Uniform Building and
Fire Codes will be placed on the project so no impacts to fire services will occur. No impacts
are anticipated.
b) Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the project will not change the
pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in
property to be patrolled as the project site is within an area that is regularly patrolled.
The Etiwanda School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District serve the
project area. Both school districts have been notified regarding the proposed development.
A Standard Condition of Approval will require the developer to pay the School Impact Fees,
With this standard mitigation, impacts to the School Districts are not considered significant.
The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The
nearest park is located .22 mile from the project site. The project will not require the
construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in
the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities, A Standard
Condition of Approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. No impacts
are anticipated.
e) The proposed project will utilize existing public facilities. The site is in a developed area,
currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The project will not require the
construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in
the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Cumulative
development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand. for library services. According
to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.9.9), the projected increase in library space under the
General Plan will not meet the projected demand. The General Plan FEIR identified the
/51
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2004-00269, DRC2004-00270, SUBTT16882, DRC2004-00268 Page 23
Issues and Supporting Information Sources:
Potentially
Significant
1m act
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Inco rated
No
I act
Less
Than
Significant
1m act
cumulative impact on library services as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a
Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The
proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the EIR was prepared and
impacts evaluated. Since the adoption of the General Plan, the City has planned a new
library within the Victoria Gardens regional shopping center of approximately 22,000 square
feet, which is in excess of the projected need of 15,500 square feet at build-out of the City,
Comments:
b) See a) response above.
b)
TRANSPORT ATIONfTRAFFIC. Would the project:
Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in
relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the
street system (I.e., result in a substantial increase in
either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity
ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)?
Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of
service standard established by the county congestion
management agency for designated roads or highways?
Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either
an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that
results in substantial safety risks?
Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature
(e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
Result in inadequate emergency access?
Result in inadequate parking capacity?
14. RECREATION. Would the project: () () () (v')
a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional
parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial
physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be
accelerated?
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require () () () (v')
the construction or expansion of recreational facilities,
which might have an adverse physical effect on the
environment?
a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The
nearest park is located .22 mile from the project site. This project is not proposing any new
housing or large employment generator that would cause an increase in the use of parks or
other recreational facilities. A Standard Condition of Approval will require the developer to
pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated,
15,
a)
c)
d)
e)
f)
()
()
()
(v')
()
()
()
(v')
()
()
()
(v')
()
()
()
(v')
()
()
()
()
()
()
(v')
(v')
/S~
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2004-00269, DRC2004-00270, SUBTT16882, DRC2004-00268 Page 24
Issues and Supporting Information Sources:
less Than
Significant Less
Potentially With Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
I-;"""'act fnco";:;orated ImnaCl lmnact
() () () (>")
g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs
supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts,
bicycle racks)?
Comments:
a) Implementation of the proposed project will generate an average of 580 vehicle trips daily.
The proposed project includes the development of 99 condominium units, The Traffic Study
prepared by LSA Associates Inc., dated January 12, 2005, estimates that each unit will
generate 5.86 average daily trips. As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.5),
continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area, The
proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and
impacts evaluated. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with street
improvements existing or included in project design. The project will not create a substantial
increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume, or congestion at intersections. The
project site will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along
the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards. In addition, the City has
established a Transportation Development Fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to
issuance of Building Permits. Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to
support adequate traffic circulation. No impacts are anticipated.
b) The project will generate 94 two-way peak hour trips, which is less than 250 two-way peak
hour trips for non-retail; therefore, is below the threshold of the San Bernardino Congestion
Management Plan (CMP) criteria for requiring a traffic impact analysis. The Traffic Study
prepared by LSA Associates Inc" dated January 12, 2005, estimates that each unit will
generate, .44 two-way peak hour trips daily. The project is in an area that is mostly
developed with all street improvements existing, The project will not negatively impact the
level of service standards on adjacent arterials. The project will be required to provide street
improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. No impacts
are anticipated.
c) Located approximately 4 1/2 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of
the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns. No impacts are anticipated.
d) The project is in an area that is mostly developed. The project will be required to provide
street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. The
project design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses.
The project will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design
feature. No impacts are anticipated,
e) The project will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles and will, therefore,
not create an inadequate emergency access. No impacts are anticipated,
f) The project design has adequate parking in compliance with standards of the Rancho
Cucamonga Development Code and will, therefore, not create an inadequate parking
capacity. No impacts are anticipated.
g) The project design includes, or the project will be conditioned to provide, features supporting
transportation and vehicle trip reduction (e.g., bus bays, bicycle racks, carpool parking, etc.),
IS1
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2004-00269, DRC2004-00270, SUBTT16882, DRC2004-00268 Page 25
Issues and Supporting Information Sources:
Potentially
Significant
1m act
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Inca rated
Less
Than
Significant
1m act
No
I act
16, UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the () () () (....)
project:
a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the
applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board?
b) Require or result in the construction of new water or () () () (....)
wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing
facilities, the construction of which could cause significant
environmental effects?
c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water () () () (v')
drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant
environmental effects.?
d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the () () () (v')
project from existing entitlements and resources, or are
new or expanded entitlements needed?
e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment () () () (....)
provider, which serves or may serve the project, that it
has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected
demand in addition to the provider's existing
commitments?
f) Be served by a landfilj with sufficient permitted capacity to () () () (v')
accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs?
g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and () () () (v')
regulations related to solid waste?
Comments:
a) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the
Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho
Cucamonga. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional
Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated.
b) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the
Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga
and RP-1 located within the City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity. The project is
required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board
regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated.
c) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain faciiities, which have been designed to
handle the flows, A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official
and City Engineer prior to issuance of Grading Permits. The impact is not considered
significant.
d) The project is served by the CVWD system. There is currently a sufficient water supply
available to the City of Rancho Cucamon9a to serve this project. No impacts are anticipated.
/(PD
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucarnonga
DRC2004-00269, DRC2004-00270, SUBTT16882, DRC2004-00268 Page 26
Issues and Supporting Information Sources:
Potentially
Significant
1m act
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
IncQ orated
l",
Than
Significant
I .ct
No
I ct
e) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the
Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP.4 treatment plant iocated within Rancho Cucamonga
and RP-1 located within the City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity. No impacts are
anticipated.
f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the
refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal
needs.
g) This project complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid
waste. The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures
consistent with AB 939. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated.
17, MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE () () () (.f)
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality
of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a
fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population
to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate
a plant or animal community, reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal,
or eliminate important examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory?
b} Does the project have impacts that are individually () () () (.f)
limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively
considerable" means that the incremental effects of a
project are considerable when viewed in connection with
the effects of past projects, the effects of other current
projects, and the effects of probable future projects)?
c) Does the project have environmental effects that will () () () (.f)
cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
Comments:
a) The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of
Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Exhibit IV-3, Additionally, the area surrounding the site is
developed. Based on previous development and street improvements, it is unlikely that any
endangered or rare species would inhabit the site.
b) If the proposed project were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the
site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The 2001 General
Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a
Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build-
out in the City and Sphere of Influence. The City made findings that adoption of the General
Plan would result in significant adverse effects to aggregate resources, prime farmland, air
quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and visual resources.
Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources; however, they would not
reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels. As such, the City adopted a Statement of
Overridin9 Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan
/ &i
Initial Study for
<Insert Project Name>
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 27
Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section
15092 and 15096(h)). These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing
mixed-use projects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open
space. With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further
discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required,
c) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial
adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The Initial Study identifies
construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact.
Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels. Additionally, impacts
resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construction. activities
were completed. The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with
the exposure of people to increased noise levels. Mitigation measures contained in this Initial
Study will ensure impacts are at less-than-significant levels.
EARLIER ANALYSES
Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one
or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section
15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately
analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects
were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis, The following earlier analyses
were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply):
(x) General Plan FEIR
(SCH#2000061 027, Certified October 17, 2001)
(x) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update
(SCH#88020115, certified January 4, 1989)
(x) Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan EIR
(SCH#87021615, certified September 16,1987)
(x) Etiwanda Specific Plan EIR
(SCH #82061801, certified July 6, 1983)
(x) Traffic Study prepared by LSA Associates Inc., dated January 12, 2005
(x) Noise Impact Analysis by, LSA Associates, Inc., dated November 23, 2004
(x) Air Quality Impact Analysis by, LSA Associates, Inc., dated March 2005
APPLICANT CERTIFICATION
I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I have
read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the project plans or
proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the
effects to a point where clear ignificant environmental effects would occur.
Signature: .
Date:
1/ I~/D>
Print Name and Title:
'oS T Az:.y I..-I,.J
P kJf:l:::T MPrN 1t"1CR.
/&2
Chairman Stewart comm
Design Review Committee,
e presented a great project even in the first meeting of the
Commissioner Fletcher added that the project is attractive, tha . n has detail that will be
visible from the street and that it will be a nice addition to the community,
Motion: Moved by McPhail, seconded by Fletcher, to ap ro
DRC2005-00764 as presented by staff, Motion carri oWing vote:
rmit
AYES: FLETCHER
NOES:
EWART
CIAS, McNIEL
- ca rried
-*D'
*****
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2004-00269-
LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY - A request to change the land use designation from
Community Commercial to Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) on 9,68 acres on
the north side of Foothill Boulevard, east of Etiwanda Avenue, APN: 1100-161-04. Related
files: Development District Amendment DRC2004-00270, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16882,
and Development Review DRC2004-00268. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative
Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration, This action will be forwarded to the City
Council for final action and the date ofthe Public Hearing before City Council will be separately
noticed, Continued from December 14,2005,
E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT
DRC2004-00270 - LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPAN-Y - A request to change the zoning
designation from Community Commercial to Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre)
within the Foothill Boulevard Districts on 9,68 acres on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, east
of Etiwanda Avenue, APN: 1100-161-04. Related files: General Plan Amendment
DRC2004-00269, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16882, and Development Review
DRC2004-00268, Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental
impacts for consideration, This action will be forwarded to the City Council for final action and
the date of the Public Hearing before City Council will be separately noticed. Continued from
December 14, 2005,
F, ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16882 - LEWIS
INVESTMENT COMPANY - A request for a seven numbered and two lettered lot subdivision of
9,68 acres for 99 condominiums on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, east of Etiwanda
Avenue. APN: 1100-161-04, Related files: General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00269,
Development District Amendment DRC2004-00270, Development Review DRC2004-00268.
Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration,
Continued from December 14, 2005,
G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00268 - LEWIS
INVESTMENT COMPANY - A request to develop 99 condominiums on 9,68 net acres within
the Community Commercial land use designation of the Foothill Boulevard Districts on the north
side of Foothill Boulevard, east of Etiwanda Avenue, Land use amendment applications to
change the zoning to residential categories are accompanying this application, APN:
1100-161-04, Related files: General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00269, Development District
DRC2004-00270, and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16882. Staff has prepared a Mitigated
Planning Commission Minutes
Ex[,ibJi- B
-3-
c~ 3/,1 0 b
January 11, 2006
/&3
#.,.~_.,J
Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration.
December 14 2005.
Continued from
Larry Henderson, Principal Planner presented the staff report commenting that the request would
add a residential element to the area. He commented that one person contacted him regarding the
projec\,!:lJ1d that no opposition was received, He said the project has a unique style and amenities,
He added that he had a discussion with the noise consultant and that if the Commission deems it
appropriate, the 12-foot wall currently proposed may be reduced in height if he can evidence the
change with appropriate documentation, He asked the Commission if they would be open to
allowing staff to address this issue with the noise consultant at a later date but to go ahead with their
action tonight with that in mind, .
Chairman Stewart asked if staff is comfortable with that.
.
Mr. Henderson stated he is and that if there is any doubt, staff could consult another noise
consultant to verify the documentation.
Chairman Stewart opened the public hearing.
-/
Mark Thomas, William Lyon Homes, stated he is the project manager. He said they are proud ofthe
product being presented, He then gave a powerpoint presentation detailing the conceptual design
of the project. He noted that the noise consultant is currently indicating the wall need not be higher
than 9 feet.
Chairman Stewart closed the public hearing,
Kevin Ennis, Assistant City Attomey recommended the following revised language to apply to noise
mitigation Condition #1. It shall read as follows: "A 12-foot sound wall along the southem boundary
of the project along Foothill Boulevard is required unless staff and the City's noise consultant
determine that a shorter wall is sufficient to mitigate the noise impacts, .
Commissioner McPhail commented that her general view of the project is a positive one and that it
offers many amenities. She remarked that she agrees with staff in that this project gives the
residents a place to use the adjacent commercial areas,
Commissioner Fletcher commented that generally speaking, he usually supports the retention of
commercial areas and typically would not support converting commercial areas to residential, but in
this case he agrees that this makes sense and it is an attractive project.
Motion: Moved by McPhail, seconded by Fletcher, to recommend General Plan Amendment
DRC2004-00269 and Development District Amendment DRC2004-00270 to the City Council for final
action and to approve Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16882 and Development Review
DRC2004-00268 subject to the revised condition regarding the final wall height. Motion carried by
the following vote:
AYES: FLETCHER, McPHAIL, STEWART
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: MACIAS, McNIEL - carried
*****
Planning Commission Minutes
-4-
January 11, 2006
/!;Lj
RESOLUTION NO, 06-02
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2004-00269, AMENDING THE
GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM GENERAL COMMERCIAL TO
MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELlNG UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 9,68
ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL
BOULEVARD, EAST OF ETIWANDAAVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS
IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1100-161-04.
A, Recitals.
1, Lewis" Investment Company filed an application for General Plan Amendment
DRC2004-00269 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the
subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application,"
2. On January 11, 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date,
3, All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred,
B, Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1, This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2, Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the
above-referenced public hearing on January 11, 2006, including written and oral staff reports,
together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a, The application applies to approximately 9.68 acres of land, basically a rectangle
configuration, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard and is presently vacant. Said property
is currently designated as General Commercial; and
b, The property to the north of the subject site is designated Medium density
Residential and is developed with apartmen1 units, The property to the west is designated General
Commercial and is under developed with a few single-family residences and a small business. The
property to the east is designated Office and is vacant. The property to the south is designated
general Commercial (currently vacant) and Low density Residential (developed with single-family
residences); and
c. This amendment does n01 conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan
and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and
with related development; and
d,
This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element;
C. c.- :3 / ,I 0&
It5
and
C)(H/{;/r C.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 06-02
DRC2004-00269 - LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY
January 11 , 2006
Page 2
e, This amendmen1 would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent
properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding
properties,
3, Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the
above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1
and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. That the subject property is sui1able for the uses permitted in the proposed district
in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and
b, That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the
environment nor the surrounding properties; and
c. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan.
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative
Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for
the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project
will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mi1igated Negative Declaration and
Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the
findings as follows:
a, That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines
promulgated thereunder; that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared
therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this
Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative
Declaration with regard to the application.
b, Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant
environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been
reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project which are listed
as conditions of approval in the related subdivision and development review applications that were.
reviewed concurrently with this application,
c, Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753,5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of
Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the
Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the
proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat
upon which wildlife depends, Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the
Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the
Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the
presumption of adverse effect as se1 forth in Section 753,5( c-1-d) of Title 14 ofthe California Code
of Regulations,
5, Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby recommends approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00269
subject to the following condition:
/ (p Ie
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 06-02
DRC2004-00269 - LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY
January 11 , 2006
Page 3
1 ) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against
the City, its agents, officers, or ernployees, because of the issuance of such
approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall
reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any court costs and
attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required
by a court to pay as a result of such action, The City may, at its sole discretion,
participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such
participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition.
6. The Secre1ary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11 TH DAY OF JANUARY 2006
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
I ;Ch~
Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary
I, Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and
adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the
Planning Comrnission held on the 11 th day of January 2006, by the following vote-to-wit:
---"
ATTEST:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, McPHAIL, STEWART
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS, McNIEL
1& 1
~
-;
~
~..
~..
~..
~..
~..
~..
~..
~.. 1":-: -:.;
~ "",".' "'
'~ /"/
..... .... .... ,', ','
. _'. ..... _'. I I I . _' .' _'
C Subject Property
Existing Zoning
DL
nWi'iliJ LM
.........
.........
_M
IIIDI CC
mRRC
n""'!'::!ICO
.....
L\\\\'I OS
200 0 200 400 Feet
I I
00
EXISTING
GENERAL PLAN
I&~
OO~Q<>'OQ..O.~OOO
OO"'aliI(> Ql)R;1.) 0 0 0
0000000000000
000000000000
000000000000
00000000000
0000000000
~
,,:.~
,r-",-
'::j::j::j.
.............
......"'...."
...............
"II';:,,';:.';:"';::':,,!
......."...."'.,.1'.'"
......................
.:,,-::,-::,,-::,,-::,'C=,,-::,'C:,!
"","",",-",-,-",.",.",-",
...................................
."'."'."'."'."'."'."'."'....'"
.......................................
...."'."'."'............."'."'.'"
..........................................
"","",e",_'.'.'.'.'_"'_'_"'_'
..............................................
.,.,."'....,.,.,.,.,.,.,......
..................................................
. "..;..;-.;..;-.;-.;".;-,,-.;..;..;-.;-,,-'"
jo-:;::;/:;::j::;::j.":;::;::;::;::;::"":. j.
:::;.::j.":j.":j.":;::,,,,:;::;.,,:,,":j::,.":j.":" j.
j.":;::;.":;.":;.":j.":j.":;::;.":;.":;.":"":,,,,:" j.
:-":;::t:;::;,":,.":,,,,:;.,,:;.,,:" . . "":" j.
;.,,:;::,.,,:,,":;,'":j.":;.":;::;:: ;''':;' ":" j.
;.,,:;.,,:,":;.":;.":;::;.::j::j.": ;.":;. ":";' m
;::j.":;''':,,'':;''':;::;''':;::j.'': ;.":;. ":" j. )>
~~~~~~>>>>>> >>.~.~ 00
>>>>~~~~~>>>>>> ~.~.~ -l
.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~. .~ .~..
-::"-::,,-::,,-::,,-::,,-::,,-::.-::,,-::,,. -::" .-::". -:
I
....
f 1
C SUBJECT PROPERTY
PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN
1'.......1 LOW
....
_ LOW MEDIUM
11III MEDIUM
~~!~i GENERAL COMMERCIAL
1''''''''1 OFFICE
LSSI FLOOD CONTROL I UTILITY CORRIDOR
Ic;x] PARK
200
I
o
200
400 Feet
(j)
PROPOSED
GENERAL PLAN
/(P1
RESOLUTION NO. 06-03
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2004-00270, A REQUEST
TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP FROM COMMUNITY
COMMERCIAL TO MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER
ACRE) WITHIN THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD DISTRICTS FOR 9,68
ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD,
EAST OF ETIW ANDA, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -
APN: 1100-161-04,
A, Recitals.
1. Lewis Investment Company filed an application for Development Distric1 Amendment
DRC2004-00270, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the
subject Development District Amendment is referred to as "the application,"
2, On January 11, 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and issued Resolution No. 06-02
recommending to the City Council that the associated General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00269
be approved.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred,
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2, Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the
above-referenced public hearing on January 11, 2006 including written and oral staff reports,
together wi1h public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a, The application applies to approximately 9,68 acres of land, basically a rectangle
configuration, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, east of Etiwanda Avenue, and is
presently vacant. Said property is currently designated as Community Commercial; and
b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated Medium Residential and
is developed with apartment units. The property to the west is designated General Commercial and
is under developed wi1h a few single-family residences and a small business, The property to the
east is designated Office and is vacant. The property to the south is designated general
Commercial (currently vacant) and Low Density Residential (developed with single-family
residences); and
ExH/8IT D
Cc.
g/,/o<O
/1D
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO, 06-03
DRC2004-00270 - LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY
January 11 , 2006
Page 2
c, This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan
and will provide for developmen1, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan
and with related development; and
d. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element;
and
e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent
properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding
properties.
3. Based upon the subs1antial evidence presented to this Commission during the
above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1
and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district
in terms of access, size, and compatibility with the existing land use in the surrounding area; and
b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the
environment nor the surrounding properties; and
c, That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan,
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative
Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for
the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project
will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and
Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the
findings as follows:
a, That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines
promulgated thereunder; that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared
therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this
Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative
Declaration with regard to the application,
b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant
environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been
reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project which are listed
below as conditions of approval.
c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of
Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the
Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the
proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat
upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the
Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the
Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the
presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753,5(c-1-d) of Title 140f the California Code
of Regulations,
J 7 j
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 06-03
DRC2004-00270 - LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY
January 11 , 2006
Page 3
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby recommends approval of Development District Amendment
DRC2004-00270 subject to the following condition:
1) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against
the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such
approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall
reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and
attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required
by a court to pay as a result of such action, The City may, at its sole discretion,
participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such
participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition.
6, The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11 TH DAY OF JANUARY 2006.
PLANNING 0 MISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
ATTEST:
Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary
I, Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and
adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the
Planning Commission held on the 11 th day of January 2006, by the following vote-to-wit:
NOES:
COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER. McPHAIL. STEWART
COMMISSIONERS: NONE
COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS. McNI EL
'\
AYES:
ABSENT:
~
/71
RESOLUTION NO. 0 to - 0 (p 5
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT DRC2004-00269, AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND
USE MAP FROM GENERAL COMMERCIAL TO MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL
(8-14 DWELlNG UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 9.68 ACRES OF LAND,
LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, EAST OF
ETIW ANDA AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -
APN: 1100-161-04.
A, Recitals.
1. Lewis Investment Company filed an application for General Plan Amendment
DRC2004-00269 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the
subject General Plan Arnendrnent is referred to as "the application."
2. On March 1, 2006, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly
noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred,
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this City Council during the
above-referenced public hearing on March 1, 2006, including written and oral staff reports, together
with public testimony, this City Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to approximately 9.68 acres of land, basically a rectangle
configuration, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, and is presently vacant. Said property
is currently designated as Community Commercial; and
b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated Medium Density
Residential and is developed with apartment units; to the east is designated Office and is vacant; to
the south is designated Community Cornmercial (currently vacant) and Low Density Residential
(developed with single-farnily residences); and to the west is designated Cornmunity Commercial
and is under developed with a few single-family residences and a small business; and
c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan
and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and
with related developrnent; and
d. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element;
and
/73
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
DRC2004-00269 - LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY
March 1, 2006
Page 2
e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent
properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding
properties.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this City Council during the
above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1
and 2 above, this City Council hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district
in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and
b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the
environrnent nor the surrounding properties; and
c. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan.
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative
Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessmentfor
the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence thatthe project will have a
significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring
Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as
follows:
a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the
California Environrnental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines
promulgated thereunder; that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared
therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this
Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative
Declaration with regard to the application.
b, Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant
environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been
reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project which were
adopted as conditions of approval in the related subdivision and development review applications
that were reviewed concurrently with this application.
c, Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753,5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of
Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the
Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the
proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat
upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the
Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the inforrnation provided to the
City Council during the public hearing, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse
effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this City Council hereby recommends approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00269
subject to the following condition:
1) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against
the City, its agents, officers., or employees, because of the issuance of such
approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall
reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any court costs and
/7~
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
DRC2004-00269 - LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY
March 1, 2006
Page 3
attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required
by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion,
participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such
participation shall not relieve the applicant of his obligations under this condition,
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 1 ST DAY OF MARCH 2006
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
/75
City of Rancho Cucamonga
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
The following Mitigated Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with
the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code,
Project File No,: General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00269, Development District Amendment
DRC2004-00270, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16882, and Development Review DRC2004-00268.
Public Review Period Closes: January 11, 2006
Project Name:
Project Applicant: Lewis Investment Company
Project Location (also see attached map): Located within the Community Commercial Land Use
Designation of Foothill Boulevard Districts on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, east of Etiwanda
Avenue - APN: 1100-161-04.
Project Description: A request to change the land use and zoning designation from Community
Commercial to Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) on 9.68 acres for a seven
numbered and two lettered lot subdivision for 99 condominiums.
FINDING
This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an
Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is
proposing this Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the following finding:
The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but:
(1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this
proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the
effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and
(2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project, as revised, may have a
significant effect on the environment.
If adopted, the Mitigated Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not
be required, The factual and analytical basis for this finding is included in the attached Initial
Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho
Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax
(909) 477-2847.
NOTICE
The public is invited to comment on the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration during the
review period.
March 1, 2006
Date of Determination
Adopted By
/7(P
DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. 755
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT
DRC2004-00270, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT MAP FROM COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL TO MEDIUM
RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) WITHIN THE
FOOTHILL BOULEVARD DISTRICTS ON 9.68 ACRES, LOCATED ON
THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD EAST OF ETIWANDA,
AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1100-161-04.
A. Recitals.
1. On January 11, 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing with respect to the above referenced Development
District Amendment and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted its Resolution No. 06-02,
recommending that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt said Amendment.
2. On March 1, 2006, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a
duly noticed public hearing on the Development District Amendment.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred,
B. Ordinance.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ordains as follows:
SECTION 1: This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the
Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct.
SECTION 2: Based upon substantial evidence presented to the City Council during the
above-referenced public hearing on March 1, 2006, including written and oral staff reports,
together with public testimony, the City Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to approximately 9.68 acres of land, basically a
rectangle configuration, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, east of Etiwanda
Avenue, and is presently vacant. Said property is currently designated as Community
Commercial; and
b, The property to the north of the subject site is designated Medium Density
Residential and is developed with apartment units; to the east is designated Office and is
vacant; to the south is designated Community Comrnercial (currently vacant) and Low Density
Residential (developed with single-family residences); and to the west is designated Community
Commercial and is under developed with a few single-family residences and a small business;
and
c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General
Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the
General Plan and with related development; and
/71
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
DRC2004-00270 - LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY
March 1, 2006
Page 2
d. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element;
and
e, The proposed Development District Amendrnent is within the City of Rancho
Cucamonga; and
f.
properties and
properties.
This amendment will not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent
will not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding
SECTION 3: Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during
the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in
Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, the Development District Amendment is hereby amended to change
the Development District Map, in words and figures, as shown in the attached Exhibit A.
SECTION 4: Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated
Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental
assessrnent for the application, this Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the
project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative
Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference,
based upon the findings as follows:
a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with
the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines
promulgated thereunder; that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared
therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Cornmission; and, further, this
Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative
Declaration with regard to the application.
b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant
environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been
reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project which were
adopted as conditions of approval in the related subdivision and development review
applications that were reviewed concurrently with this application.
c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753,5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code
of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole,
the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the
proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat
upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the
Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to
the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the
presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California
Code of Regulations.
SECTION 5: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this
Ordinance is, for any reason, deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of
any court of competent jurisdiction, or preempted by legislative enactment, such decision or
/7~
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
DRC2004-00270 - LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY
March 1, 2006
Page 2
legislation shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City
Council of the City of Rancho Cucarnonga hereby declares that it would have adopted this
Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or words thereof, regardless
of the fact that anyone or more sections, subsections, clauses, phrases, or words might
subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional or preempted by subsequent legislation.
SECTION 6: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause
the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley
Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and
circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
171
~
~..
~..
~..
~..
~..
~..
>..
~..
~
.~.~.~.~ ~.~.~.~.~.
.~.~.~. .~.~.~.~.~.
.~.~.~.~ ~.~.~.~.~.
~.~.,. . .,.,.,.,.,.
...............
,.,.,.,. .,.,.,.,.,.
............ ...............
,.,.,.,. .,.,.,.,.,.
.......... ...............
,.,.,.,. .,.,.,.,.,.
.......... ...............
,.,.,.,. .,.,.,.,.,.
.......... ...............
,.,.,.,. .,.,.,.,.,.
.......... ...............
,.,.,.,. .,.,.,.,.,.
.......... ...............
,.,.,.,. .,.,.,.,.,
.......... ...............
,.,.,.,. .,.,.,.,.,
.......... ...............
,.,.,.,. .,.,.,.,.,
....... .
. ... ...........
. . . . . .. .
..................................
. . . . . .. .
................
. . . . . .. .
................................
. . . . . .. .
...............
. . . . . ..
...............................
. . . . . ..
...............
. . . . . . .
.............................
. . . . . . .
..............
. . . . .. .
...........................
. . . . . .
.............
. . . . . .
..........................
. . . . ..
............
. . . . . .
........................
. . . . . .
............
. . . . .
.......................
. . . . .
...........
. . . . .
......................
. . . . . .
...........
. . . . . .
.....................
. . . . .
..........
. . . . .
...................
. . . . .
~.
..:.
~.
.~.
.~.
.........
"'."'.
........
.",.",.
...........
.",.",.
............
",.",.",.
..............
.....
.:,.-=.:-:
.",.",.",
.;::;'":;::j.
..............
",.",.",..1'..1'
r1'-:j.":;'":;'":;'-:;'
...................
.1'..1'.",..1'..1'..1'.
........................
.1'..1'..1'.-1'..1'..1'..1'..1'
...........................
~.-I'.rI'."'.rI'.rI'."'.rI'.rI'
.............................
..1'..1'..1'..1'..1'..1'..1'..1'..1'
..................................
..1'..1'..1'..1'..1'.",..1'..1'..1'..1'
.....................................
..1'..1'..1'..1'..1'..1'..1'..1'..1'.",..1'
........................................
..1'."'..1'..1'."'..1'.",..1'..1'..1'..1'..1'
.;'":j.":j.":j.":j.":j.":j.":j.":j.":j.":;'":j.":j.
................................................
.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.-=.~.~.~.~.-:
j.":j.":j.":j.-:j.":;'":;'":j.":j.":j.":j.":;'":j.":. ;.
;,":;,":;,":;,":;'":;'-:;'":;'":;'-:j.":;'":;'":;'":. ;.
;,":;,":;,":;,":;,":;::;''':;'":;'":;'":;'":;''':;.":. ;.
;''':;'":;'":;'":;'":;''':;'":;''':;.":. . . .,,:. ;.
;.":;.":;.":;'":j.":;.":;.,,:;.":;.,,: ;.":;. -:.;'
;.":;.":;.":;.":;.":;.":;::;.":;.": ;.":;. ":.;.
;''':;''':;''':;''':;'":;''':;''':;''':;''': ;.":;. ":.;'
;,":;,":;,":;::;''':;''':;.'':;.":;.'': ;.": ..1'":. ;.
;.,,:;.,,:;.,,:;.,,:;.":;.":;.":;.,,:;.,,:. ;.": .;.,,:. ;.
...................................... ..... .
-=:.rC.:rC.:-:.:rC.:rC.:-=:,.!.:rC:.. rC:. .rC.::.. rC
m
)>
en
-l
........ ....................................
.1'..1'..1'. .-1'."'."'..1'..1'."'..1'."'..1'..1'.",
....... ......................................
.1'".1'.",. ..1'."'.-1'..1'..1'..1'..1'.",..1'..1'..1'
........ .......................................
"'..1'.",. ..1'."'."'..1'..1'."'..1'..1'."'..1'.",
.....................................
.1'..1'."'.-1'..1'..1'.-1'..1'..1'.",..1'..1'..1'..1'..1'
..................................................
rC:.-=:"rC.::.rC.::.rC.::.rC.::.rC:.~.::.-=:.rC.::.rC:"rC:"rC:.,,:.rC
"'..1'..1'."'..1'..1'..1'..1'."'..1'.",..1'..1'..1'..1'
...................................................
I
....
f I
C Subject Property
PROPOSED ZONING
=L
L::.::.::J
_LM
BM
~~~~~1 CC
rn RRC
I;"';"';! CO
.....
~OS
200
I
o
200
400 Feet
00
PROPOSED
ZONING
t<60
THE
C I T Y
o F
I
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Staff Report
DATE:
TO:
March 1, 2006
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
Fabian A. Villenas, Management Analyst III, City Manager's Office
CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA AMENDING REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO THE
ISSUANCE OF MASSAGE PERMITS BRINGING CITY ORDINANCE
INTO COMPLIANCE WITH NEW STATE LEGISLATION
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Recommendation
It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached amendment to
Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section pertaining to the issuance of massage
licenses. Specifically, the revisions conform to new legislation, AB 665, which
requires municipal ordinances to provide for denial of a massage license upon proof
that the business owners, operators or personnel are subject to the Penal Code's
sex offender registration provisions,
Backqround
Existing state law authorizes cities to adopt licensing ordinances for massage
businesses. These statutes are codified in Government Code Section 51030, et
seq, Currently, Section 51032 identifies certain license denial grounds that may be,
but do not have to be, included in a massage licensing ordinance. One of those
denial grounds is that the City has proof that the business owners, operators or
personnel are subject to the sex offender registration provisions of Penal Code
Section 290.
AB 655 (Salinas), new legislation that went into effect the beginning of this year,
amends Section 51032 to make denial of a massage license mandatory, rather than
discretionary, if the City has proof that business owners, operators or personnel are
subject to the Penal Code's sex offender registration provisions. So if the above
mentioned are registered or required to register as sex offenders, then the City is
obligated to automatically deny a massage license. The City of Rancho Cucamonga
I ~/
Page 2
March 1, 2006
CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AMENDING
REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO THE ISSUANCE OF MASSAGE PERMITS BRINGING CITY
ORDINANCE INTO COMPLIANCE WITH NEW LEGISLATION
already conducts background checks for individuals seeking massage permits and
automatically denies a permit to any registered sex offender.
The City Attorney's Office has prepared the attached ordinance for the City Council's
consideration,
It is recommended that this amendment be adopted, requiring the denial of a
massage license to individuals registered as sex offenders, and placing the City's
massage licensing ordinance in compliance with new legislation.
Respectfully Submitted,
~~ ~ ~~ ~
Fabian A. Villenas
Management Analyst III, City Manager's Office
/ <62
ORDINANCE No.7:; (p
AN ORDINANCE OF THE cITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA AMENDING REGULATIONS
APPLICABLE TO THE ISSUANCE OF MASSAGE PERMITS.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby ordains as follows:
Section 1. Subsection 7 of Section 9.24.040 E of Chapter 9.24 of Title 9 of the
Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
"7. As to each applicant and owner of at least ten percent (10%) of the
massage establishment and/or out call massage business, all convictions for any crime
that requires registration under any state, federal or other governmental law similar to and
including California Penal Code Section 290, and whether or not any such person is
required to register pursuant to Section 290 or any such similar law, and convictions for
any crime that involves conduct which is a violation of any state, federal or other
governmental law similar to and including California Penal Code Sections 266h, 266i,
314,315,316,31"8,647, or any other crime involving the elements of the foregoing code
sections, by way of plea bargain, or any other crime involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or
moral turpitude, For purposes of this Article 1, 'conviction' shall include a conviction
pursuant to a plea of guilty or nolo contendere;"
Section 2. A new subsection "h" is hereby added to Section 9.24.040 E.22 of Chapter
9.24 of Title 9 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to read as follows:
"h, The applicant, including any ten percent (10%) or more owner of the
massage establishment or outcall massage service, or any massage technician
employed by or working out of or in connection with the massage establishment
or outcall massage service, is not required to register under the provisions of
California Penal Code Section 290 or similar criminal statute."
Section 3. A new subsection "3" is hereby added to Section 9.24.210 M of Chapter
9.24 of Title 9 ofthe Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to read as follows:
"3, The applicant is not required to register under the provisions of
California Penal Code Section 290 or similar criminal statute."
Section 4.
Severability.
The City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph,
sentence, or word of this Ordinance be rendered or declared invalid by any final court
action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the
remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences and words ofthis Ordinance shall
remain in full force and effect.
11231/0001l867490.1 doc.
1
1~3
Section 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption ofthis Ordinance and shall
cause the same to be published in the manner prescribed by law.
ADOPTED AND APPROVED this _ day of
,200_.
Mayor
I, DEBBIE ADAMS, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City
Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the _ day of
200_, and was finally passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga held on the _ day of , 200_, by the following
vote:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS: .
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAINED:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
11231100011867490.1 doc.
2
/~'-I
STAFF REpORT
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Date:
March 1, 2006
RANCHO
CUCAMONGA
To: Mayor and Mernbers of the City Council
Jack Larn, AICP, City Manager
From: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
By: Mike Olivier, Senior Civil Engineer
Kenneth Fung, Assistant Engineer
Subject: 210 FREEWAY LANDSCAPING UPDATE
The installation of landscaping within the 210 Freeway right-of-way (R/W) is a joint project of the
San Bernardino Associated Governments (SAN BAG) and the California Department of
Transportation (Caltrans). Caltrans designs the landscaping and SAN BAG constructs it. The
landscaping work has been divided into several phases, and construction by SAN BAG is as follows:
A. Seament 3 - West City Limits to East of Hermosa Avenue
Construction is scheduled to cornmence in the summer of this year and completed by
rnid-2007.
B. Seament 4 - East of Hermosa Avenue to Halfway Between Milliken Avenue and
Rochester Avenue
Construction is scheduled to comrnence in the fall of this year and completed by late
2007. I
C. Seament 5 - Halfway Between Milliken Avenue and Rochester Avenue to and includinq
the interchanqe of 210 and 1-15
Construction has been completed.
D. South Freeway Slope between Woodruff Place and Rochester Avenue
Caltrans will plant large (box size) trees along the south freeway slope (in Caltrans RlW).
They will piant as many of these trees as $93,850 will allow. This dollar amount was
worked out by City planners and engineers some years ago. The City is working with
Caltrans designers in selecting and placement of the trees. Caltrans wants to finish the
landscaping on Segment 4 (late 2007) before planting the trees on the slope so that the
irrigation systern will be in for the trees, Therefore, planting of the trees on the freeway
slope is scheduled in late 2007 and should be completed in early 2008.
E. Hiqhiand Avenue Between Woodruff Place and Rochester Avenue
The City has a project to plant large (box size) trees in the north parkway of Highland
Avenue. Construction is scheduled to commence in June of this year and be completed
within a couple of rnonths.
/~5
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
RE: 210 FREEWAY LANDSCAPING UPDATE
MARCH 1, 2006
PAGE 2
F. Fisher Dfive (formerlv Hiqhland Avenue) from East Avenue to Mulberry Street
The City has a project out to bid now to landscape the north parkway of Fisher Drive.
Construction is scheduled to start in April of this year, and should be completed within a
couple of months.
These last three projects by Caltrans and the City (D; E and F) will supplement nicely the basic
landscaping originally planned with the freeway design by providing a screen between the raised
freeway in these areas and the residential housing south of the freeway.
Respectfully submitted,
LJt,ejp {it/ULL
William6. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:MO/KF:ls
I g!P