The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2006/04/19 - Agenda Packet 5:30 p.m. 7:00 p.m. U[f{] ~ <CII1rY OF LNClHIO CC1UCAMONGA 10500 Civic Center Drive ~ Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730-3801 AGIENDAS o lRedleve~olPmerr1l~ A91err1lcy o !Fire Pm~ec~iorr1l lDis~ric~ o Ci~y Cm.mci~ REGULAR MEETINGS 1st and 3rd Wednesdays ~ 7:00 p.m. Al?RIlL :R9~ 2~~({]) AGENCY, BOARD & CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS William J. Alexander.................... Mayor Diane Williams............... Mayor Pro Tem Rex Gutierrez............................Member L. Dennis Michael .....................Member Sam Spagnolo.......................... Member Jack Lam......................... City Manager James L. Markman.............City Attorney Debra J. Adams..................... City Clerk ORDER OF BUSINIESS Closed Session. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. Tapia Conference Room Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting. .. Council Chambers Regular Fire Protection District .......... Council Chambers Regular City Council Meeting. . . . . . . . . . . . . Council Chambers ~ INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC tt RANcHO CUCAMONGA TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL The City Council encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the Agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approvai or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the City Council on any agenda item. Please sign in on the clipboard located at the desk behind the staff table. It is important to list your name, address and phone number. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under "Public Communications". There is opportunity to speak under this section at the beginning and the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the City Council should be given to the City Clerk for distribution. To address the City Council, please come forward to the podium located at the center olthe staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. All items to be placed on a City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, one week prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's office receives all such items. AGENDA BACK-UP MATERIALS Staff reports and back-up materials for agenda items are available for review at the City Clerk's counter and the Public Library. A complete copy of the agenda is also available at the sign in desk located behind the staff table during the Council meeting. LIVE BROADCAST Council meetings are broadcast live on Channel 3 for those with cable television access. Meetings are rebroadcast on the second and fourth Wednesdays of each month at 11 :00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. The City has added the option for customers without cable access to view the meetings "on-demand" from their computers. The added feature of "Streaming Video On Demand" is available on the City's website at www.cLrancho- cucamonga.ca.us/whatsnew.htm for those with Hi-bandwidth (DSUCable Modem) or Low-bandwidth (Dial-up) Internet service. The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers Located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Members of the City Council also sit as the Redevelopment Agency and the Fire District Board. Copies of City Council agendas and minutes can be found at http://www.ci.rancho-cucamonga.ca.us I) If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477-2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibiiity. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. ---"-"""".".- CITY COUNCIL AGENDA APRIL 19,2006 -7:00 P.M. 1 THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY ;". HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE "................, , . . . ' " .- RANcHO CUCAMON A. CALL TO ORDER I 1, Roll Call: Alexander _, Gutierrez _' Michael _ Spagnolo _' and Williams [ B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENT A TIONS I 1. Presentation of a Proclamation to West Valley Mosquito and Vector Control District in recognition of "Mosquito and Vector Control and West Nile Virus Awareness Week, April 24-29, 2006." 2. Presentation of a Proclamation in recognition of Recording for the Blind and Dyslexic's, April 23-29, 2006, as "Record-A- Thon Week." 3. Presentation of a Proclamation in recognition of Parents of Murdered Children, April 23-29, 2006, as "National Crime Victim's Week." II C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS II This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. D. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember or member of the audience for discussion. 1. Approval of Minutes: March 15, 2006 April 3, 2006 2. Approval of Check Register dated March 29 through April 11, 2006, and Payroll ending April 11, 2006, for the total amount of $2,484,418.10. 1 3. Approve to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of March 31,2006. 29 --- -- ---- CD CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ,. , , <;i' ., ! APRIL 19,2006 -7:00 P.M. 2 THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY RANCHO HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE ~CUCAMONGA 4. Approval of a Public Convenience or Necessity Determination, DRC2006-00295 - Smart & Final Stores, for a Type 21 Off-Sale General Alcohol license for a specialty food store in the Neighborhood Commercial District, located on the southwest corner of Base line Road and Carnelian Street - APN: 0207-022-04 30 RESOlUTION NO. 06-110 36 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A DETERMINATION OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY FOR A TYPE 21 OFF-SALE GENERAL ALCOHOl LICENSE FOR A SPECIALTY FOOD STORE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND CARNELIAN STREET - APN: 0207-022-04. 5. Approval of plans, specifications and estimate, and authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the "Base line Road Street light and Sidewalk Improvement Project" within Community Facilities District 2001-01, to be funded from Acct. No. 1612303-5650/1442612- O. 38 RESOLUTION NO. 06-111 40 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "BASE LINE ROAD STREET LIGHT AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT PROJECT" WITHIN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2001-01, IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS 6. Approval to reject all bids received for the Bridge Maintenance and Rehab Project at Heritage Park as being non-responsive to the needs of the city, and approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the "Bridge Maintenance and Rehab Project at Heritage Park," to be funded from Park Fees. 45 RESOLUTION NO, 06-112 47 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "BRIDGE MAINTENANCE AND REHAB PROJECT AT HERITAGE PARK" AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS -' < ",', T;; '.". UU.., ...' ,.' RANCHO CUCAMONG' CITY COUNCIL AGENDA APRIL 19,2006 -7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE 3 7. Approval of plans, specifications and estimate, and authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the "Solar Speed Detection Sign Project," to be funded from Accl. No. 1025001/5650-1530. 51 RESOLUTION NO. 06-113 53 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "SOLAR SPEED DETECTION SIGN PROJECT" AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS 8. Approval of an appropriation of $5,000.00 for design survey and printing of Wilson Avenue Street Widening and Rehabilitation from Archibald Avenue to Amethyst Avenue to Accl. No, 1172303- 5650/1586172-0, to be funded from Gas Tax/Proposition 2106-2107. 58 9. Approval of Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update. 59 10. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 36 and Street light Maintenance District Nos, 1 and 6 for DRC2004- 00721, located at the northwest corner of Milliken Avenue and 7'h Street, submitted by Fairway Business Centre, LLC, and Milliken and Greystone Properties, LLC. 72 RESOLUTION NO, 06-114 74 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR DRC2004-00721 RESOLUTION NO. 06-115 75 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DRC2004-00721 11. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Parcel Map 16445, located on the north side of Sixth Street, approximately 1,000 feet east of Archibald Avenue, submitted by Chang Revocable Trust 83 - CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ,; " , , APRIL 19,2006 -7:00 P.M. ,';', " 4 " ,j THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY RANCHO HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE , . UCAMONn> c RESOLUTION NO, 06-116 85 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 16445, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY 12. Approval of Map for Tract 14759-3 located at Wardman Bullock Road and Wilson Avenue, submitted by Pulte Homes - APN: 226-102-17. 86 RESOLUTION NO, 06-117 88 A RESOlUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 14759-3 13. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No, 7 and Street lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 7 for Tract 16226-1, located north of Day Creek Boulevard and west of Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by K. Hovnanian Forecast Homes, Inc. 89 RESOLUTION NO, 06-118 92 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 16226-1, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY RESOLUTION NO. 06-119 93 A RESOlUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO, 7 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7 FOR TRACT 16226-1 14. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities, Monumentation Cash Deposit and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No, 1 and Street light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 for Tract 16320, located at the south side of Vista Grove, north of Wood ridge Drive, east of Hermosa Avenue, submitted by Team 7 Properties, 101 I Ct CITY COUNCIL AGENDA . , , ;- APRIL 19,2006 -7:00 P.M. "., , 5 ." . , . THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY RANCHO HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE L___' UCAMON~' c RESOLUTION NO. 06-120 103 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP 16320, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT RESOLUTION NO. 06-121 104 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO, 1 AND STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR TRACT MAP 16320 15. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Traffic Signal at Long Meadow Drive and Victoria Park Lane for Tract No, 16372, located on the northwest corner of Church Street and Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by Victoria Arbors, LLC. 112 RESOLUTION NO. 06-122 113 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT LONG MEADOW DRIVE AND VICTORIA PARK LANE FOR TRACT 16372 16. Approval to execute an Addendum to the Epicenter Rental Contract CO 94-039) with the Rancho Cucamonga High School for Waiver of Rental Fees associated with graduation ceremonies at the Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter in exchange for city use of the Rancho Cucamonga High School's gymnasium for the City's Youth Basketball Program for 2007 and 2008, 114 17, Approval to accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $607,340.00 to the apparent low bidder, Gentry Brothers, Inc. (CO 06-036), and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $60,734.00 for the Milliken Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation from 41h Street to 61h Street, to be funded from AD 82-1 funds, Accl. No. 1600303- 5650/1467600-0 and Transportation funds, Accl. No. 1124303- 5650/1467124-0 and appropriate an additional amount of $300,000 to Accl. No. 1124303-5650/1467124-0 from Transportation fund balance. 117 ~ CITY COUNCIL AGENDA . ' , ;- APRIL 19,2006 -7:00 P.M. " . THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY 6 RANcHO HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE , . UCAMONG' c 18, Approval of a Street Frontage Reimbursement Agreement (CO 06- 037) for construction of street and parkway improvements on the south side of 6th Street, west of Hyssop Drive (approximately 170 feet) in conjunction with development of Parcel Map 16010, submitted by RKW Development Corporation, SRA-42, 122 RESOLUTION NO. 06-123 126 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A STREET FRONTAGE REIMBURSEMENT (SRA-42) EXECUTED ON APRIL 19, 2006, FOR THE INSTALLATION OF STREET AND PARKWAY IMPROVEMENTS ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 6TH STREET, WEST OF HYSSOP DRIVE (APPROXIMATELY 170 FEET) 19. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Parcel Ma~ 16323, located on the east side of Haven Avenue, south of 6t Street, submitted by Ledesma & Meyer Development Company, Inc. 127 RESOLUTION NO. 06-124 130 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR PARCEL MAP 16323 20. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 14771, located on the north side of Ringstem Avenue, east of Haven Avenue, submitted by Toll Brothers, 131 RESOLUTION NO. 06-125 134 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 14771 21, Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 16454-1, located southeast corner of Base line Road and Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by KB Home Greater Los Angeles, Inc, 135 -- - CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ,. , , :', "I : APRIL 19,2006 -7:00 P.M. 7 ' .. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY RANcHO HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE ,--CUCAMONG' RESOLUTION NO. 06-126 138 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 16454-1 22. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 16567, located between Foothill Boulevard and San Bernardino Road and between Hellman and Malachite Avenues, submitted by WL Route 66 Associates. 139 RESOLUTION NO. 06-127 142 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 16567 23, Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Cash Deposit for DRC2003-00319, located at the cul-de-sac terminus of Birdsong Place, west of Hermosa Avenue and south of Almond Street, submitted by Hardwood Homes. 143 24, Approval to accept Improvements, retain the Faithful Performance Bond in lieu of a Maintenance Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for DRC2004-00145, located on the south side of Arrow Route, east of Utica Avenue, submitted by Public Storage, Inc. 145 RESOLUTION NO. 06-128 147 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2004-00145 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 25, Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for Tract 16612, located on the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Church Street, submitted by D.R. Horton Los Angeles Holding Co" Inc. 148 ~ CITY COUNCIL AGENDA . , , ::': .,... ~ APRIL 19,2006 -7:00 P.M. 8 THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY RANCHO HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE 1 I UCAMONG' c RESOLUTION NO, 06-129 150 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 16612 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 26, Approval to release the Faithful Performance Bond No. 8193-62-79 in the amount of $2,768,209,00 for the improvements in Phase 3A of Community Facilities District 2003-01, including street, storm drain, water main, traffic signals and fiber optic conduits, Contract No. 03- 135. 151 27, Approval to release Faithful Performance Bond No 2042010 in the amount of $827,058.40, for the landscaping and Sidewalk in Phase 1A of Community Facilities District 2001-01, Contract No, 04-011. 153 28, Approval to release Faithful Performance Bond No, 8195-82-23 in the amount of $1,388,377.70 for Phases 1B(B), 3B(A), & 3B(B) of CFD's 2001-01 & 2003-01 for street, storm drain, and related improvements on Foothill Boulevard, Contract No, 04-041. 155 29. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for DRC2002-00519, located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and the 1-15 Freeway northbound on-ramp, submitted by Fountainhead Delta. 157 RESOLUTION NO. 06-130 158 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCil OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2002-00519 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK ..----1...-......--............... I II \_. 1@1 I R..NCHO ,---CUCAMONGA "'T CITY COUNCIL AGENDA APRIL 19,2006 -7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELO IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE III , I I E. CONSENT ORDINANCES The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non- controversial. The Council will act upon them at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion. 1, CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 19,12 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO FLOOD DAMAGE PROTECTION TO COMPLY WITH THE LATEST FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY (FEMA) REGULATIONS IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDINANCE NO. 757 (second reading) i I II AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 19.12 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE, PROVIDING FOR FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT REGULATIONS F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have been advertised andlor posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. 1. CONSIDERATION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDING ALLOCATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2006-2007 - A review of the federally required Annual Action Plan, which includes the final selection of CDBG projects, based on a new grant allocation of $1 ,034,606, 2, CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE AND APPROVAL OF A RESOlUTION WHICH GOVERN REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEDICATION OF PARK LAND AND/OR PAYMENT OF FEES IN- LIEU THEREOF IN CONNECTION WITH RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISIONS OF 51 PARCELS OR GREATER ORDINANCE NO. 759 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING REGULATIONS GOVERNING DEDICATION OF PARK LAND AND RELATED IN.lIEU FEES, AND AMENDING TITLE 16 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE 9 160 II 183 256 259 I-~~ ! ' i L RANCHO CUCAMONGA ...,.""". I CITY COUNCIL AGENDA APRIL 19,2006 -7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE 10 [----.--- .-.-..-.. I [ ! RESOLUTION NO, 06.131 264 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING PLANNED PARK LAND ACREAGE, RESIDENTIAL LAND VALUES, AND AVERAGE RESIDENTIAL DENSITIES, FOR THE PURPOSE OF CALCULATING LAND DEDICATION AND IN- LIEU FEE REQUIREMENTS PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 16.32 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE G. PUBLIC HEARINGS I The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. 1. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE THAT ADOPTS CLARIFYING REFERENCES IN CHAPTERS 1 2, AND 14 OF DIVISION OF TITLE 3 OF THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CODE, ADOPTED BY REFERENCE, PERTAINING TO THE REGULATION OF ANIMALS IN RANCHO CUCAMONGA (URGENCY ORDINANCE) 291 ORDINANCE NO. 760 (URGENCY) 291-3 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CLARIFYING REFERENCES IN PROVISIONS OF THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CODE PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED BY REFERENCE, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CHAPTERS 3 AND 12 OF DIVISION 2 OF TITLE 3 OF THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CODE, ALL PERTAINING TO THE REGULATION OF ANIMALS, AMENDING TITLE 6 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE, AND DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF 3. CONSIDERATION OF THREE ALTERNATIVES FOR HIGHLAND AVENUE 292 I 'l ~ CITY COUNCIL AGENDA APRIL 19,2006 -7:00 P.M. 11 THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY L RANCHO HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE CUCAMONGL. -----.--. --~----------------- -..".-."--. I ill , H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS II -I The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. No Items Submitted. , , , i III I. COUNCIL BUSINESS II The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. 1. COUNCil ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council member.) J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING II K. ADJOURNMENT II I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on April 13, 2006, seventy two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. March 15, 2006 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCil MINUTES Reoular Meetino ~ A. CALL TO ORDER ~I A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, March 15, 2006, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor William J. Alexander called the meeting to order at 7:09 p.m. Present were Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, L. Dennis Michael, Sam Spagnolo, Diane Williams and Mayor William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack lam, City Manager; Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Director; James C. Frost, City Treasurer; larry Temple, Administrative Services Director; Manuel Pilonieta, IS Manager; Charles Scott, Sr. Information Systems Specialist; Sid Siphomsay, Information Systems Analyst; Dawn Haddon, Purchasing Manager; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Mike TenEyck, Administrative Resource Manager; Dan Coleman, Acting City Planner; Tom Grahn, Associate Pianner; Trang Huynh, Building Official; Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director; Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III; Daniel Schneider, Community Services Supervisor; Deborah Clark, Library Director; Captain Pete Ortiz, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; Chief Peter Bryan, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Shirr'1 Griffin, Office Specialist II - City Clerk's Office; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. ****** II B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS II B1. Presentation of a Prociamation designating March as Red Cross Month. Mayor Alexander stated representatives from the Red Cross are not present tonight, but there is a proclamation recognizing March as Red Cross Month * .. * * * * II C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS II C1. John lyons asked if the item Councilmember Gutierrez put on the agenda for Mr. lacy would be opened for public comment. He mentioned openehighlandavenue.com website. He stated you can get on the website and fill out a survey. He stated it is a full blown campaign with efforts to open up Highland. He stated by opening this it will make things safer for the high school students as well as the senior citizens. He wondered who would pay for the landscaping if it does remain closed. He hoped the Councii will reopen this, He stated our hearts and prayers go out to the lewis family for the loss of Goldie lewis. C2. Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager, commented on "Operation Pet Project" to occur at Central Park on March 29th as they prepare for the shelter opening. She commended Kelly Heilig for her enthusiasm for this event. She also thanked staff that have also been involved in the preparation of this event. City Council Minutes March 15, 2006 Page 2 C3. Jim Peugh encouraged the Mayor to enforce order and decorum at the meetings. He wanted to point out that 80% of the fire calls are E~S and not fire related. He mentioned that a private contractor responds to these calls with the fire department. He wanted the Council to think that it is the response time that is important to the victim. He suggested there might be more efficient ways to dispatch services when there is an emergency. C4. Jeff Noll wanted to thank everyone for listening to their concerns they have had in the past regarding the closure of Highland. He stated they wanted to talk about the Austin Faust Traffic Study. He asked that Mr. Faust's payment be withheld because of the poor quality of the study he conducted. He continued to talk about the incorrect information in the study and the way it was conducted. C5. Alan Hostetter continued commenting about the Austin Faust Traffic Study. He talked about the conclusions of the study, the point made by Mr. Faust that the City can "legally" have Highland open. He did not feel Mr. Faust was qualified to give legal advice. He did not think the Council could consciously keep it closed. He continued to talk about the flaws in the study completed by Mr. Faust. He recommended the Council not allow Mr. Faust to continue any further with this project. He felt the Council should keep Mr. Faust away from Rancho Cucamonga. He felt the only solution to this was to keep Highland permanent closed. C6. Nicole Myerchin extended her condolences to a friend of hers who lost his wife and the Mother of his children. She commented on a meeting she had with City staff regarding the shelter. She stated she has concerns about the construction going on at the shelter. She questioned the space being allocated for offices. She asked the Council to do this right the first time. She felt we need a surgery location at the shelter. She stated she was concerned this didn't go out to bid, and that it was awarded to an architect without going through this process. She asked the Council to look into these concerns so staff does not have to come back to the Council to ask for more funds in the future. C7. Donna Martin stated she was running for Mrs. California and representing Rancho Cucamonga. She stated she hopes to bring one home for Rancho. C8. Chris Fenner commented about the wall that is absent along the freeway to protect people from going down onto Highland. He felt it was only a matter of time before another accident happens again. He felt it was up to the City to protect the residents. He felt the cost of a wall would be less money than any liability that might occur from an accident. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated a few meetings ago a man approached the Council about this same issue. He stated the next day he wrote a letter to Caltrans to construct a wall for more protection along this area. He stated today he got a letter from Caltrans stating they will install 1200 feet of guardrail along this area. C9. A man who did not identify himself, stated Mr. O'Neil's comments are very positive, but hoped it wouldn't preclude the Council from pursuing the type of wall that is really needed in this area. He asked the Council to continue fighting for more to make it even safer. C10. Bryan Brock, lives near the Highland area, commented on Joe O'Neil, City Engineer's, statement about the guardrail. He stated he hoped the Council will keep pushing for a wall. He felt this needed to be corrected and done right with a wall. C11. Maria Roque stated she wanted to talk to the Council about securing a sound wall for this area. She felt this is needed for the safety of people because she did not think a guardrail would keep a big rig from going through there. She asked the Council to think of the people living in this area to keep them safe. * * * * * * City Council Minutes March 15, 2006 Page 3 D. CONSENT CALENDAR 01. Approval of Minutes: February 15, 2006 February 27,2006 D2. Approval of Check Register dated February 22 through March 7, 2006, and Payroll ending March 7, 2006, for the total amount of $4,683,448.96. D3. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Construction of Milliken Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation from 4'n Street to 6th Street, to be funded from Accl. No. 1124303- 5650/1467124-0 (Transportation Funds). RESOLUTION NO. 06-065 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "MILLIKEN AVENUE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM 4TH STREET TO 6TH STREET" IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS 04. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Citywide Installation of Emergency Vehicle Preemption, to be funded from Accl. No. 1025001-5650/1507025-0, Capital Reserve. REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION BY COUNCILMEMBERS WILLIAMS AND MICHAEL. RESOLUTION NO. 06.066 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CITYWIDE INSTAllATION OF EMERGENCY VEHICLE PREEMPTION IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS D5. Approval to accept grant revenue in the amount of $44,520 awarded by the State of California Office of Traffic Safety into Accl. No. 1231000-4740 (Grant Income) and authorization to appropriate $39,720 into Accl. No. 1231303-5200 (Operations and Maintenance) and $4,800 into Accl. No. 1231303-5100 (Travel and Meetings) for the acquisition of countdown pedestrian signals. REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION BY COUNCILMEMBERS WilLIAMS AND MICHAEL. 06. Approval of an appropriation of $25,000 to Accl. No. 1614303-5650/1442614-0 from Community Facilities District 2003-01 (Fund 614) fund balance to be used for legal services for right-of-way acquisition. 07. Approval to appropriate the remaining $251,690 of Public Library Bond Act Funds designated for furniture, fixtures and equipment into Fund 310 for items to be purchased for the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center Library, and authorize the related appropriations into the appropriate account numbers to be determined by staff. 08. Approval of the Resolutions approving and confirming the Engineer's report and setting of public hearing for May 17, 2006, to levy the annual assessments for Fiscal Year 2006/2007 for landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10. No increase of assessment rate is proposed. City Council Minutes March 15,2006 Page 4 RESOLUTION NO. 06-067 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCil OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FOR APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 AND 10. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 06-068 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN lANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1,2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 AND 10 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2006/2007 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PALCE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO D9. Approving of the Resolutions approving and confirming the Engineer's report and setting of public hearing for May 17, 2006, to levy the annual assessments for Fiscal Year 2006/2007 for Street lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1,2,3,4,5,6, 7 and 8. No increase of assessment rate is proposed. RESOLUTION NO. 06-069 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FOR APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORTS FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT REATE PROPOSED. RESOLUTION NO. 06-070 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCil OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO lEVY AND COllECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAITNENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2006/2007 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO D10. Approval of the Resolutions approving and confirming the Engineer's reports and setting of public hearing for May 17, 2006, to levy the annual assessments for Fiscal Year 2006/2007 for the Park and Recreation Improvement District (PD-85). No increase of assessment rate is proposed. RESOLUTION NO. 06-071 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCil OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FOR APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORT FOR PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-85). NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT REATE PROPOSED. City Council Minutes March 15, 2006 Page 5 RESOLUTION NO. 06-072 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCil OF THE CITY OF RANCHO ~UCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO lEVY AND COllECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-85) FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2006/2007 PURSUANT TO THE lANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO D11. Approval of the Annexation to landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 for 10915 Hillside Road, located on the south side of Hillside Road, west of Canistel Avenue, submitted by Jeffrey J. and Dolores Watson. RESOLUTION NO. 06-073 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAITNENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAITNENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR 10915 HillSIDE ROAD (APN: 1074-441-15) 012. Approval of the Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update. 013. Approval of a Resolution of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to quitclaim to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District all of its right, title and interest to certain real property commonly known as Jersey Fire Station #174 and Maintenance Facility, located at 11297 Jersey Boulevard; including the termination of an existing lease between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as lessor, and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, as lessee; obtain a license from the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District for the use of an approximately 480-square foot wood shop located within such property; and acceptance by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District of the transfer of title. RESOLUTION NO. 06-074 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCil OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE TRANSFER AND TERMINATION OF ALL EXISTING INTERESTS IN THE PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS JERSEY FIRE STATION NO. 174 AND MAINTENANCE FACILITY SUBJECT TO A LICENSE FOR THE USE OF THE WOOD SHOP WITHIN SUCH PROPERTY 014. Approval of a Resolution of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to quitclaim to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District all of its right, title and interest to certain real property commonly known as Banyan Fire Station #175, located at 11108 Banyan Street; including the termination of an existing lease between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as lessor, and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, as lessee; and acceptance by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District of the transfer of tille. RESOLUTION NO, 06-075 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE TRANSFER AND TERMINATION OF All EXISTING INTERESTS IN THE PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS BANYAN FIRE STATION NO. 175 City Council Minutes March 15, 2006 Page 6 D15. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to Street lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for DRC2005-001 09, located on the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Haven Avenue, submitted by GAPPCO, llC. RESOLUTION NO. 06-076 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGAREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DRC2005. 00109 RESOLUTION NO. 06-077 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DRC2005-00109 D16. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security Cash Deposit for Public Street Improvements, and Monumentation Cash Deposit and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for Parcel Map 16488, located on the north side of Laurel Street, between Red Oak Street and Aspen Avenue, submitted by Oasis Homes, Inc. RESOLUTION NO. 06-078 \ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP 16488, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY CASH DEPOSIT FOR PUBLIC STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT RESOLUTION NO. 06-079 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCil OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS, 1 AND 6 FOR SUBTPM 16488 D17. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Tract No, 16512, located on the north side of Church Street and east of Milliken Avenue, submitted by KB Home Greater los Angeles, Inc. RESOLUTION NO. 06-080 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCil OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY RELATED TO CHURCH STREET MEDIAN ISLAND lANDSCAPING FOR TRACT NO. 16512 D18. Approval of a contract between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the County of San Bernardino (CO 06.021) for the provision of Senior Transportation Services for homebound senior citizens and to accept the grant revenue in the amount of $500,000 into Ace!. No. 1271000-4740, and appropriate funding the in the amount of $500,000 into Ace!. No. 1271401-5300, REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION BY COUNCllMEMBERS WilLIAMS AND MICHAEL. City Council Minutes March 15, 2006 Page 7 019. Approval to accept bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $185,000.00 to the lowest responsible bidder, Southern California Landscape, Inc. (CO 06- 022), and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $18,500.00 for the Fisher Drive landscape Improvements, to be funded from Developer Trust funds, Accl. No. 1882000-2314, and appropriate an additional amount of $5,000.00 for construction soils! materials testing to Accl. No. 1882000-2314 from Developer Trust fund balance. 020. Approval to award a contract to INX, Inc., to provide computer network equipment and maintenance for the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center, utilizing a current competitively bid WSCA Contract, No. AR1478, in the total amount of $98,713 ($94,012 plus a 5% contingency of $4,701), to be funded by the 2001 Tax Aliocation Bond Fund (Fund 650) and the Public library Bond Act Fund (Fund 310), and authorize the related appropriations into the appropriate account numbers to be determined by staff. 021. Approval of a Resolution and an Amendment to a Cooperative Agreement, No. 8-1267 (CO 05- 083), between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the State of California for the improvement of the northbound 1.15 Freeway on-ramp at Foothill Boulevard. RESOLUTION NO. 06-081 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO. 8-1267 BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 022. Approval to release Faithful Performance Bond that was held in lieu of a Maintenance Bond for Tract 14875, located at the southeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Church Street, submitted by Ambling West, llC. 023. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond, and file a Notice of Com~ietion for improvements for Parcel Map 16282, located on the northeast corner of Miliiken Avenue and 4 h Street, submitted by Marketplace Covina, loP. RESOLUTION NO. 06-082 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCil OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 16282 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 024. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for Tract 16512, located on the northeast corner of Miliiken Avenue and Church Street, submitted by KB Home Greater Los Angeles, Inc. RESOLUTION NO. 06-083 A RESOlUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 16512 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D25. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance bond, and file a Notice of Compietion for improvements for Tract 16542, located at 6717 East Avenue, north of Victoria Street, submitted by J.T. Storm Development No.2, llC City Council Minutes March 15, 2006 Page 8 RESOLUTION NO. 06-084 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 16542 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D26. Approval to release the lake Pump Equipment Vault at Red Hill Community Park, Contract No. 05- 049, as complete, retain the Faithful Performance Bond as a Guarantee Bond, release the labor and Material Bond, and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $127,555.13. RESOLUTION NO. 06-085 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCil OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE lAKE PUMP EQUIPMENT VAULT AT RED Hill COMMUNITY PARK, CONTRACT NO. 05-049, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D27. Approval to release Faithful Performance Bond No. 220421 In the amount of $294,889.00 for the Rochester Avenue, north of Highland Avenue and Haven Avenue, north of 19th Street, landscaping Project, Contract No. 04-077. D28. Approval to release Faithful Performance Bond No. 6161457 in the amount of $87,342.50 for the Highland Avenue landscape Improvements, east of Day Creek Boulevard, Contract No. 04-160. D29. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for DRC2002-00292 (PM 16044), located on the southeast corner of White Oak Avenue and Arrow Route, submitted by Capellino and Associates. D30. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for DRC2002-00306, located on the north side of Alta loma Drive, approximately 300 feet west of Haven Avenue, submitted by Glenwood Development. D31. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for DRC2002-00606, located on the west side of A f th th. Hermosa venue, south 0 8 Street and north of 7 Street, submitted by Hermosa 2 PI, llC. D32. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Cash Deposit for DRC2003-00072, located on the east side of Archibald Avenue between 4th and 6th Streets, submitted by CAlWEST Industrial Properties. D33. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee letter of Credit for DRCDROO-41, located on the south side of 6th Street, west of Haven, submitted by Cabot Industrial Properties, l.P. D34. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Parcel Maps 16123, 16124 and 16125, located on the east side of Haven Avenue, south of Arrow Route, and on the west side of Monroe Court cul-de-sac, north of Jersey Boulevard, submitted by Haven Partners, llC. D35. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bonds for Tract 16263, located on the southeast corner of Base line Road and Ellena West, submitted by KB Home Greater los Angeles, Inc. D36. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 16264, located on the south side of Mountain View Drive between Milliken Avenue and Terra Vista Parkway, submitted by KB Home Greater los Angeles. MOTION: Moved by Michael, seconded by Alexander to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports contained within the Consent Calendar with the exception of items 4, 5 and 18. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. City Council Minutes March 15,2006 Page 9 Discussion of item D4. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Citywide Installation of Emergency Vehicle Preemption, to be funded from Accl. No. 1025001- 5650/1507025-0, Capital Reserve. Council member Michael stated the City has budgeted about $700,000 to retrofit all of the signals so they have the vehicle preemption control devices in order to approve response time. Discussion of item 05. Approval to accept grant revenue in the amount of $44,520 awarded by the State of California Office of Traffic Safety into Accl. No. 1231000-4740 (Grant Income) and authorization to appropriate $39,720 into Accl. No. 1231303-5200 (Operations and Maintenance) and $4,800 into Accl. No. 1231303-5100 (Travel and Meetings) for the acquisition of countdown pedestrian signals. ' Councilmember Michael stated item 05 follows along with pedestrian safety and suggested to the City Engineer that the pedestrian countdown signals that will be installed will include those that are adjacent to or close to some of the senior citizen complexes. Councilmember Williams asked how those intersections will be chosen and have sound. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated there have been a couple of intersections where blind people have made the request for sound and they will be put in at that location. He added they wait for a request to determine where they are needed. She felt it might be proactive to go ahead and put in the sound where seniors are using them. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated this could be looked at, but added the Grant does not cover this. Discussion of item 018. Approval of a contract between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the County of San Bernardino (CO 06-021) for the provision of Senior Transportation Services for homebound senior citizens and to accept the grant revenue in the amount of $500,000 into Accl. No. 1271000-4740, and appropriate funding the in the amount of $500,000 into Accl. No. 1271401- 5300. Councilmember Michael wanted the community to be aware that senior transportation is an issue that this Council has been dealing with for many years. He stated Supervisor Biane gave $500,000 of County funds to the City to be utilized for senior transportation services. He stated the Community Services Department has completed a 2,000 piece mail out regarding senior citizen transportation needs. This will tell the City what the important needs are for them. He stated then the City will be able to determine how this money will exactly be spent for the senior transportation needs. MOTION: Moved by Michael, seconded by Williams to approve the staff recommendations in items D4, D5 and D18. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. .. * * .. .. * II E. CONSENT ORDINANCES II E1. CONSIDERATION OF DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2004-00270 _ lEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY - A request to change the zoning designation from Community Commercial to Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) within the Foothill Boulevard Districts on 9.68 acres on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, east of Etiwanda Avenue. APN: 1100-161-04. Related files: Development Review DRC2004-00268, General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00269, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16882. City Council Minutes March 15, 2006 Page 10 ORDINANCE NO. 755 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCil OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2004-00270, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT MAP FROM COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL TO MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) WITHIN THE FOOTHill BOULEVARD DISTRICTS FOR 9.68 ACRES, lOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD EAST OF ETIWANDA, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORTTHEREOF-APN: 1100-161-04 E2. CONSIDERATION OF SECOND READING OF AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AMENDING REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO THE ISSUANCE OF MASSAGE PERMITS. BRINGING CITY ORDINANCE INTO COMPLIANCE WITH NEW STATE lEGISLATION ORDINANCE NO. 756 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCil OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO THE ISSUANCE OF MASSAGE PERMITS Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the titles of Ordinance Nos. 755 and 756. MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Spagnolo to waive full reading and approve Ordinance No. 755 and 756. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. * * * * *. F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS F1. CONSIDERATION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT DRAFT FUNDING ALLOCATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2006-2007 - A review of the federally-required Annual Action Plan, which includes the preliminary selection of CDBG projects, based on a new grant allocation of $1,034,606. A staff report was presented by Tom Grahn, Associate Planner. Councilmember Gutierrez asked if there is anyone that received money last year that will not get any money this year. Tom Grahn, Associate Planner, stated no. Councilmember Williams stated every year this is a difficult task so that everyone gets something, and she complimented Tom Grahn on his work. She mentioned in Washington D.C. there is talk about completely eliminating CDBG funding and encouraged people to contact their legislators about the importance of this program. Tom Grahn, Associate Planner, stated it would be a disappointment to completely eliminate this. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the Council were: Diane Case for Project Sister, told about their organization and what they do. She asked the Council to approve their request for funding. City Council Minutes March 15, 2006 Page 11 Olen Jones representing HOPE through Housing Foundation, thanked the City for their partnership. He complimented Tom Grahn for his work and hoped to continue the relationship with the City. Greg Alvarado, Old Timers Foundation, told about their organization and its success. He thanked the Council for their continued support of their program. Dianna Lee, YMCA, thanked the Council for their continued support of their" programs. She told about the services they provide to the community. There being no further input, the public hearing was closed. MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Michael to approve staff's recommendation. Motion carried 5-0. F2. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCil OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AMENDING ELECTRIC RATES. FEES AND CHARGES PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS AND AUTHORITY OF CHAPTER 3.46 OF TITLE 3 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE A staff report was presented by Mike TenEyck, Administrative Resources Manager. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. RESOLUTION NO. 06-086 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ELECTRIC RATES, FEES AND CHARGES PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS AND AUTHORITY OF CHAPTER 3.46 OF TITLE 3 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE MOTION: Moved by Michael, seconded by Williams to approve Resolution No. 06-086. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. ****** G. PUBLIC HEARINGS No Items Submitted. ****** II H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REpORTS II H1. 2006 DISTINGUISHED PROJECT AWARD - CITY POLICE BUilDING ADDITION (Oral Report) Trang Huynh, Building Official, told about the award they received from the Western Council of Construction Consumers for the police building addition. He stated it involved a lot of effort between Police, Fire, Engineering, Purchasing, Facilities and the IS Department. ACTION: Report received and filed. City Council Minutes March 15,2006 Page 12 H2. RANCHO CUCAMONGA TELEPHONE AND ON-LINE PERMIT SYSTEM (RCTOPS) (Oral Report) Trang Huynh, Building Official, told about their new program, and introduced Manuel Pilonieta, Information Systems Manager, who continued with the presentation by displaying a power point, which is on file in the City Clerks office. ACTION: Report received and filed. * * * * * * II I. COUNCIL BUSINESS II 11. COUNCil ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Councilmember.) Mayor Alexander stated the issue that was to be brought back about expanding the senior wellness room will come back at a later date because of options being explored. Councilmember Michael mentioned the award Trang Huynh, Building Official, just addressed the Council about. He mentioned the Vagos Motorcycle Gang arrests, and that added it was run through Rancho Cucamonga's Emergency Operations Center (EOC). He commended Fire Chief Peter Bryan and the IS staff for the great op~.ration they have deveioped. He commented on the Job Fair held today at the community center and the great event it was. He also commented on the Wellness Fair recently hosted by Supervisor Biane and Assemblyman Emerson Councilmember Williams also commented on the Wellness Fair and the success of the event. She also commented on the EOC event and its success. She stated she and Councilmember Michael, along with City Manager Jack lam, went to Washington, D.C. to meet with legislators to talk to them about funding for the 1-15 Baseline Interchange. Councilmember Gutierrez thanked the City staff who are addressing the needs of high traffic congestion throughout the City and also the high speeds of people driving. He stated he would be working on these issues this year. He mentioned the freeway issue previously brought up and the need for more protection. He asked that information on guardrails for this area be brought back at the April 19th meeting. Councilmember Spagnolo mentioned graffiti and asked people when they see it to call it in to the Graffiti Hotline. He reported on the taggers that have been arrested. He commented on the cost to the City to clean up the graffiti. He thanked the Police Department for their work. 12. CONSIDERATION OF RECOMMENDATIONS BY GARY lACY Gary Lacy, 7969 Jennet Street, stated it is apparent to the citizens in the City that public safety is important. He fell we have a very fine Fire Department and has never said anything against it or the job they do. He stated his issue is about politics. He stated it is about the citizens deciding about public safety and it is about decorum in this Chamber. He stated it is also about open and honest government. He felt the discussions should be honest and unbiased. He stated this is not about enemies, but about the issue of public safety, He stated the whole issue about public safety is who is stacked at the top. He felt people should be asked their connections to the City. He did not see anything wrong with enforcing decorum at the meetings so people are not intimidated. He stated he has heard from a number of peopie saying they are intimidated by the "influence and power that the local fireman's union has." He felt that was disgraceful. He felt an unbiased citizens' committee should study this issue, and that is what he is proposing. Council member Spagnolo stated he is confused by Mr. Lacy's comments going from decorum to the strategic plan. City Councii Minutes March 15, 2006 Page 13 Councilmember Michael asked James Markman, City Attorney, about people identifying their address and asked what they are required to provide when they speak at the podium. James Markman, City Attorney, stated this isn't so much a first amendment issue. This is all about the Brown Act with regards to Mr. lacy's first two issues. The third one is about forming a citizen's committee. He felt a person speaking before the Council can be required to identify themselves. He felt you could probably ask them to say where they live by way of City. He stated it is clear that you cannot ask them to reveal a phone number or an address or anything else specific which would indicate for example I am or am not an employee of the City, I have relatives or don't have relatives who are employees with the City or anything along that line. He stated you can't condition someone's right to speak to the Council by requiring them to reveal data. That is absolutely crystal clear. He stated if the Council wanted to adopt Mr. Lacy's statement or some form of it and ask people to fOllow it, and they decline, that would be the end of the inquiry. He stated that is the law and that is as far as you can go. He stated as far as decorum, it is even a little bit worse because the control of decorum is strictly voluntary and it is up to the Mayor. He added the only time you can call people out for not maintaining decorum is if they are impeding the progress of the meeting to the point where you really can't conduct the business meeting. He added he has seen maybe on three occasions where peopie or groups of people are removed from the Council Chamber or a person removed from the podium because he won't give it up regardless of what the Mayor asks him to do. He added that people are allowed to come into the Council Chamber with signs, not just tee shirts, but signs that say all sorts of things. He stated the right for people in an assembly like this where they address their local elected officials can use whatever tone they want. He stated if people are not disrupting the ability of the Mayor to conduct the meeting, then they can say what they want to say and do what they want to do. He didn't feel what he has seen in Rancho Cucamonga is disruptive. He added on a scale of 1 to 10, it doesn't get to a 3 in Rancho Cucamonga compared to what he has seen in other cities. He added the Mayor can do anything he wants to do to try encourage polite decorum and encourage people not to act in a way that intimidates people who wish to speak to the other side of the issue, anyway he sees fit. He pointed out that we do have the Chief of Police here if somebody really won't leave the podium or otherwise completely disrupts the meeting. He stated the Mayor could actually order the person be arrested under the penal code. It is essentially disturbing the peace and that person could be marched out of here. He stated that is the legal rule, and those are the legal criteria. It doesn't mean you can't try for more. Councilmember Michael stated he does have concern when he hears from people that they are intimidated about speaking before the Council because of what others will think of their comments. He wished we could control this so there is an environment of peace and comfort. He stated if we can't require something by law, he would like to hear what his colleagues have to say about this. He felt possibly at a future date a community committee might be needed, but for now he is ready to be responsible for the issue. Councilmember Williams stated she understood what the City Attorney stated about NO.1 in Mr. Lacy's letter, but felt we should ask people to identify themselves. With regards to No.2 in Mr. lacy's letter, she stated for many years in the past there was not anyone acting out at the meetings. She stated now things are different and she didn't feel it was a good example for the students that attend. She stated this is a business meeting and felt decorum was important and people should be respectful. She felt the cheering and booing was not appropriate and was distracting. With regards to Mr. lacy's item No.3, she agreed with Councilmember Michael and felt the Council should make those decisions. Councilmember Gutierrez stated there are many people that come to the Council meeting that are scared and intimidated. He stated he wants these meetings to be as professional as possible. He stated he believes there should be decorum at the Council meetings. He stated the Mayor is a good man, but does allow people to say whatever they want. He stated he does have a different style and that he would run the meetings differently. He felt we should encourage the audience to be professional. He felt we should have a sign at the podium informing the speakers to give their name and address, who they work for and if they have any ties to the City. He felt public comments should be honest and open. He felt Mr. lacy's comments have merit even though he is not ready to vote on this tonight. He didn't feel we should criticize Mr. lacy for his suggestion, and stated he appreciated them. City Council Minutes March 15, 2006 Page 14 Council member Spagnolo stated this is the only place people can get up before elected officials and address the City Council about what they feel. He felt people that speak are polite and cordial. He didn't feel there is any intimidation at the meetings. He felt it was the Council's job to listen to what anybody has to say and that is what he will continue to do. Mayor Alexander stated he has very rarely seen people acting inapprppriately, He didn't want people to feel intimidated about speaking. He stated he doesn't care, or it doesn't matter, if someone lives in the City or not, that he is interested in hearing their passion. He fell Mr. lacy was insinuating people are not telling the truth. He felt there should be a cap on campaign contributions so that people running for office cannot be bought. He felt things were very good in this community. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public input. Addressing the City Council were: John lyons felt Mr. Lacy was well intended, but felt he wanted to take the Fire Department back to the Stone Age. He fell response time is very important and should be improved. He disagreed with Mr. lacy, and fell the survivor benefits of the firemen should be looked at. He fell the survey Mr. Lacy is proposing is being done in a negative light. Nicole Myerchin stated she is amazed by some of the comments made tonight. She stated she has been talking to fireman about their response times and how important that is in order for them to save lives. She said she does not have a problem with the decorum for the meetings. She felt if we are going to require people to give more information, we should require Council members to tell about their campaign contributions from someone that is before them. She felt maybe this isn't the right City for Mr. Lacy. Bill McCliman stated we have talked about these issues before. He felt this issue is ridiculous and didn't understand why this is coming forward for discussion. He didn't agree with Mr. lacy's suggestions. He stated he is tired of people belittling public employees. He felt this is a waste of time. He stated freedom of speech cannot be stopped. He inquired who put this on the agenda. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he put this on the agenda for discussion. Mr. McCliman asked Council member Gutierrez when he first started talking to Mr. Lacy about this. I Councilmember Guiierrez stated a few months ago. John Preston agreed with the City Attorney on the first 2 items presented by Mr. Lacy, but fell public input was important and that there should be a committee of the public to work on public safety. Bill McCob stated he didn't think it was wrong to ask people to state their name, etc. and that this is on the back of the agenda. Councilmember Spagnolo stated he also didn't agree with Mr. lacy because of the form he wanted people to fill out to speak. Mayor Alexander asked If anyone wants to take any action on Mr. lacy's suggestion. MOTION: Moved by Michael, seconded by Gutierrez to look at the information submitted, and if it is concluded there are good suggestions, then modifications can be made. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. City Council Minutes March 15, 2006 Page 15 ******** A recess was taken at 9:41 p.m. The meeting was called back to order at 9:55 p.m. with all Councilmembers present. .******* 13. DISCUSSION OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIRE STRATEGIC PLAN AND FUNDING OPTIONS AS REQUESTED BY JAMES TOWNSEND, PRESIDENT. RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATION Jim Townsend, representing the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Fighters, thanked the Fire Chief for developing the strategic plan to address the needs of the City. He appreciated hearing the need for two fire stations. He stated they agree with the pay as you go plan. He stated they appreciate the Council approving the toois they need to do their job. He stated now they need a funding mechanism to implement the plan. He stated they need more stations and personnel now. He mentioned when Councilmember Michael was Chief, they always went for the cream of the crop when hiring people. He stated lives are at stake when the Fire Department can't respond in four minutes. He stated if the City does have the money, this should be a priority. He stated we don't have the best model for life saving, but it would help. He stated CPR trained employees would really help save lives. He stated AlS care is also very important. He introduced Mr. Roger Myiock with the firm of Harvey Rose Account Corporation who was hired by them to do a review and evaluation of the City's financial condition. Roger Mylock, Vice President of the Harvey Rose Accountancy Corporation, stated they were hired to do an independent evaluation of Rancho Cucamonga's financial condition. They looked at financial statements through June 30, 2005, and have concluded that the City is in excellent financial condition. He continued to explain in detail his findings to come up with this conclusion. He felt the City is in excellent financial condition by the fact that it has had very sound budget policies and procedures over the last many years in order to minimize expenditures, maximize savings, and ultimately the build up of reserves. He stated reserves build up when your revenues exceed your expenditures. James Markman stated he disagreed with the information Mr. Mylock presented on the Redevelopment Agency debt statements. Mayor Aiexander stated the City Manager, just prior to this meeting, explained a iot of just exactly what Mr. Mylock has just presented, and added there is very little difference in what was stated on both sides. He added he wasn't ready to make a decision on this information tonight without having the opportunity to let it sink in, understand where it is coming from in order to act in an appropriate manner. Mr. Mylock stated he is being totally independent and objective, and wanted to make sure the Council had full disclosure of the information. Councilmember Michael asked that this information be given to the City Manager's office for further review. Mr. Mylock stated he would be happy to prepare a memo with the information they need to review this. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he would like to hear what Mr. lam has to say after he has had a day to digest this. He suggested Mr. lam put this in more plain language for everyone to understand. He as.ked Mr. lam if he cared to comment at this time. Jack lam, City Manager, stated the number one goal in the City is public safety and the number two goai is sound fiscal planning and fiscal stability, He stated this has always been the Council's direction no matter who has been on the Council. He stated the City has adopted conservative investment policies. City Council Minutes March 15, 2006 Page 16 He continued to talk about how the City got into trouble in around 1989 and what it did to get out of this financial situation from laying off employees and contract employees, not giving employees raises, and also adopting a utility users tax. He felt Rancho Cucamonga should be compared to cities that are also fiscally sound. He continued explaining the City's position relating to comments made by Mr. Mylock. He stated the City is in a good position which is a good thing, and felt the Council is doing a fantastic job of maintaining that fiscal discipline to be able to do this. Mr. Mylock stated he disagreed with some of Mr. lam's comments. Mayor Alexander felt there should be the opportunity to discuss this further, and if there are better ways of doing things those should be looked at. Jim Townsend felt there is plenty of money to implement the strategic plan right now. He stated it appears the City has plenty of money and that the taxpayers have been paying a much higher level for emergency service than they have received for many years. He stated that given the amount of taxpayer dollars sitting in the City's treasury, it might be a good idea to ask the Chief if the funds are allocated sooner might resolve some of the response time issues. He mentioned most of the response time issues are on the west side of the City. He stated the District is ready to help however they can. He stated the resources are there. Jason White, Verbenia Court, stated he is concerned about the safety of his family and felt we need more stations and more personnel. He had a newspaper article from last July quoting Mr. Lam as saying ''we have little money and the City is in bad straits," and now he hears we are in great condition. He stated he was confused. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated we have reserves for emergencies. If cash flow is not there, the reserves can be used. Bill McCliman felt Mr. Mylock nailed it, and felt the City Manager should quit giving information that is over everyone's heads in responding to Mr. Mylock's report. He felt the City Manager is just trying to confuse people. He felt we need more money for senior transportation and other things that are really needed. MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Spagnolo to continue discussions on the information at a special meeting to be taped or televised. Councilmember Gutierrez asked for the City Manager to give a power point presentation to go through the information. Councilmember Michael didn't feel we should start picking and choosing what should and shouldn't get televised. Mayor Alexander stated he agreed with Councilmember Michael. Motion carried 5-0 Bill McCliman stated he would like the Council to commit there will be no threats against the Fire Department for what they have presented tonight. * * * * * * J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING No items were identified for the next meeting. City Council Minutes March 15,2006 Page 17 ****** K. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Michael to adjourn in the memory of Goldie and Ralph Lewis. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 11 :24 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: . April 3, 2006 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCil MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING II A. CALL TO ORDER II A special meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Monday, April 3, 2006, in the Council Chambers at City Hall located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor William J. Alexander called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. Present were Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez (arrived at 5:02 p.m.), l. Dennis Michael, Sam Spagnolo, Diane Williams, and Mayor William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack lam, City Manager; Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Kimberly Thomas, Management Analyst III; Fabian Villenas, Management Analyst III; Barbara Hansen, Community Program Coordinator; Sig Delheim, IS Project Coordinator; Kathy Scott, Deputy City Clerk; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. '" '" '" * '" '" B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS No communication was made from the public. '" '" '" '" '" '" C. ITEM(S) OF BUSINESS 1. RANCHO CUCAMONGA ANIMAL CARE AND SERVICES PROGRAM RECOMMENDED POLICIES AND PROCEDURES (TRANSITION - PHASE IV) Presentation by Nathan Winograd, No Kill Solutions Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager, wanted to introduce the first member of the animal services staff. She introduced Barbara Hansen, Community Program Coordinator, and added she is from the Pasadena Humane Society and has hit the ground running. ******** Rex arrived at 5:02 P.M. ******** Ms. Easter stated Mr, Winograd will be addressing the no kill issue. She stated there have been other issues that have already been endorsed by the Council. She stated this is the second portion of Mr. Winograd's presentation about the program, and that he will be coming back in the future with additional information. She stated on May 3' staff will bring a fee schedule to the Council for consideration. She stated one of the fees Mr. Winograd suggests was a $2 license fee for the spay and neuter program. She stated they would ask for Council's input on this tonight before it comes back to the Council at the May 3'" meeting. She introduced Nathan Winograd, No Kill Solutions, to give his report. City Council Special Meeting Minutes April 3, 2006 Page 2 Nathan Winograd, No Kill Solutions, gave a power point presentation which is on file in the City Clerk's office. Mayor Alexander asked if by going to a "no kill" shelter would it increase the amount of animals that come to our shelter. Mr. Winograd, No Kill Solutions, stated no it does not mean that. He stated initially there might be an increase, but eventually it will balance out. He stated most people are looking for convenience and will not drive a long way to dump their animal. Councilmember Gutierrez felt people might drop their animal on a City street hoping it gets to our shelter. Mr. Winograd, No Kill Solutions, stated this might happen initially, but would decrease in time. He felt this would prompt other cities to do a "no kill shelter" as Rancho Cucamonga is doing. Councilmember Spagnolo brought up the support groups that Mr. Winograd has listed in his study, and asked if some of the grants are tied to certain criteria for "no kill" shelters. Mr. Winograd stated the criteria he has primarily supports private shelters or a 501 (c)3 because those groups can fund raise on behalf of the City shelter. He stated most private funding does not support municipal shelters. He stated there are a few exceptions listed in his report, but that the 501 (c)3 or the Community Foundation was the way to go. Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager, stated we are an affiliate of the Community Foundation's 501(c)3. She stated at the Community Foundation's January meeting, staff presented a request that they become an affiliate to their Foundation so they can utilize their 501 (c)3 in fundraising. She stated this was unanimously supported. She thought eventually they will create their own, but for now will be affiliating with the Community Foundation. Mayor Alexander mentioned the saving of healthy and treatable animals and that is important in getting this message out. Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager, suggested to Mr. Winograd it be written that healthy and treatable feral cats to be spay and neutered and then returned to their environment. The Council felt this should be included in a mission statement as part of the "no kill" program." Pam Easter, Deputy City Manager, stated staff would include this. Council member Williams stated feral cats are a huge problem. She asked what we would do about people that have a lot of animals that are not spay or neutered. Mr. Winograd stated he would bring back a model program to help take care of this problem so there are guidelines to be followed. Discussion continued about the spaylneuter fee to be charged. Councilmember Williams stated she would like public input into this matter. Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager, stated they would bring this back at a future meeting. Councilmember Gutierrez asked if we have tracked the amount of money for license fees collected by the Cou nty. Mr. Winograd stated over the last three years it hasn't gone up that much. Special City Council Meeting Minutes April 3, 2006 Page 3 Councilmember Gutierrez asked why we can't license cats. Mr. Winograd stated you would see the "fur fly" if you did that. He stated it would be a huge bureaucratic endeavor, and that he has never seen a City implement this and make any money off of it. A man who did not identify himself stated he is disappointed with the survey taken by Mr. Winograd and that it wasn't the same as the one he took. He commented on the definition of healthy and treatable. He stated the report didn't include an exact definition of "no kill." He asked what animais this would include. He stated he was impressed with the need for volunteers. He didn't know how Mr, Winograd would keep the volunteers going. Mr. Winograd stated the only negative comments he received about the "no kill" survey were those that were sent anonymously. He stated he had to discount those because he couldn't do any follow up. Nicole Myerchin stated Kelly Heilig wasn't able to stay and that she and Kelly support the "no kill" to include healthy and treatable animals. She felt the establishment of a 501 (c)3 was a very good thing and hoped it would raise a lot of money. She supported the anti-tethering Ordinance to come back in the future. She stated she disagreed with the redesign of the shelter because it did not include a surgery area. Mr. Winograd stated there are two rooms at the shelter that are surgery ready and all that has to be done is bring in outside equipment to perform surgery, which Western University could provide. He stated he is asking the Council to adopt the definition of a "no kill" shelter tonight, and to include that healthy and treatable animals be saved. Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager, stated this would be brought back at a future meeting with the exact wording or mission statement. Mayor Alexander stated they could adopt the intent tonight. MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Spagnolo to accept the intent of the report presented defining "no kill," with a full statement to come back at a future meeting clarifying comments made tonight. Motion carried unanimously 5-0 .... .... .. .. D. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by Spagnolo, seconded by Gutierrez to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 6:50 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk/Records Manager Approved: * CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Al!enda Check Rel!ister 3/29/2006 through 4/11/2006 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00234831 3/29/2006 A AND A AUTOMOTIVE AP - 00234832 3/29/2006 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC AP - 00234832 3/29/2006 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC AP - 00234833 3/29/2006 ABC LOCKSMITHS AP - 00234833 3/29/2006 ABC LOCKSMITHS AP - 00234833 3/29/2006 ABC LOCKSMITHS AP - 00234833 3/29/2006 ABC LOCKSMITHS AP - 00234833 3/29/2006 ABC LOCKSMITHS AP - 00234833 3/29/2006 ABC LOCKSMITHS AP - 00234833 3/29/2006 ABC LOCKSMITHS AP - 00234833 3/29/2006 ABC LOCKSMITHS AP - 00234834 3/29/2006 ABLAC AP - 00234835 3/29/2006 ABLETRONICS AP - 00234836 3/29/2006 ACTION AWARDS INe. AP - 00234837 3/29/2006 ADAMSON, RONALD AP - 00234837 3/29/2006 ADAMSON, RONALD AP - 00234837 3/29/2006 ADAMSON, RONALD AP - 00234840 3/29/2006 AFLAC AP - 00234841 3/29/2006 ALESHINLOYE, MANDY AP - 00234842 3/29/2006 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT AP - 00234842 3/29/2006 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT AP - 00234843 3/29/2006 ALL CITIES TOOLS AP - 00234843 3/29/2006 ALL CITIES TOOLS AP - 00234844 3/29/2006 ALL STATES CONSTRUCTION AP - 00234845 3/29/2006 ALL WELDING AP - 00234845 3/29/2006 ALL WELDING AP - 00234846 3/29/2006 ALTA FIRE EQUIPMENT CO AP - 00234847 3/29/2006 AMERICAN ROTARY BROOM CO. INe. AP - 00234847 3/29/2006 AMERICAN ROTARY BROOM CO. INe. AP - 00234847 3/29/2006 AMERICAN ROTARY BROOM CO. INe. AP - 00234848 3/29/2006 ANWAR, SALMA AP - 00234849 3/29/2006 APW A AP - 00234850 3/29/2006 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES AP - 00234851 3/29/2006 ARBOR NURSERY PLUS AP - 00234852 3/29/2006 ARCH WIRELESS AP - 00234853 3/29/2006 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION AP - 00234853 3/29/2006 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION AP - 00234853 3/29/2006 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION AP - 00234853 3/29/2006 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION AP - 00234854 3/29/2006 AUFBAU CORPORATION AP - 00234854 3/29/2006 AUFBAU CORPORATION AP - 00234855 3/29/2006 AUTO SPECIALISTS AP - 00234856 3/29/2006 BAND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE AP - 00234857 3/29/2006 BARKSHIRE LASER LEVELING INe. AP - 00234857 3/29/2006 BARKSHIRE LASER LEVELING INC. AP - 00234858 3/29/2006 BASA T, SHAPIRO-BEN AP - 00234858 3/29/2006 BASA T, SHAPIRO-BEN AP - 00234858 3/29/2006 BASA T, SHAPIRO-BEN AP - 00234858 3/29/2006 BASA T, SHAPIRO-BEN AP - 00234859 3/29/2006 BEAMON, SANDI AP - 00234860 3/29/2006 BERGELECTRIC CORPORATION AP - 00234860 3/29/2006 BERGELECTRIC CORPORATION AP - 00234860 3/29/2006 BERGELECTRIC CORPORATION AP - 00234860 3/29/2006 BERG ELECTRIC CORPORATION User: KFINCHER - Karen Fincher Page: 1 Report:CK _AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT _ RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout 334.03 22.78 16.46 10,78 36.64 925.50 1603 60.59 23.49 24.73 125,75 16.39 12.82 777.60 198.00 81.00 282.00 2,15460 1,250.00 55,941.83 -5,594.18 14.01 21.50 166.96 574.30 2,48580 42.50 551.43 389.51 332.37 250.00 157,50 3.35 286.36 628.60 52.87 109.64 261.22 46,57 10,878.00 6,808,00 63.43 256.95 700,00 700,00 12,416.24 833.94 -1,241.62 -83,39 100,00 31,277.32 -8,193.19 -3,127.73 545,00 ---~--- Current Date: 04/12/; 1- Time: 16:4. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Al!enda Check Rel!ister 3/29/2006 through 4/11/2006 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00234860 3/29/2006 BERGELECTRIC CORPORATION AP - 00234860 3/29/2006 BERGELECTRIC CORPORATION AP - 00234862 3/29/2006 BOPKO, CHRISTOPHER AP - 00234863 3/29/2006 BROCK,OVETA AP - 00234864 3/29/2006 BRUCE, INGRID AP - 00234865 3/29/2006 BURGANDY VILLAGE HOMES AP - 00234866 3/29/2006 BUSINESS AND LEGAL REPORTS INC AP - 00234866 3/29/2006 BUSINESS AND LEGAL REPORTS INC AP - 00234867 3/29/2006 BYOUS, ROSSLYN AP - 00234868 3/29/2006 CABANA, DEBBIE AP - 00234870 3/29/2006 CALIFORNIA PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REF AP - 00234871 3/29/2006 CALSENSE AP - 00234872 3/29/2006 CARLS LIQUOR MARKET AP - 00234873 3/29/2006 CCPOA REGION 2 C/O KRISTINA NEHlS AP - 00234873 3/29/2006 CCPOA REGION 2 C/O KRISTINA NEHlS AP - 00234873 3/29/2006 CCPOA REGION 2 C/O KRISTINA NEHlS AP - 00234874 3/29/2006 CENTRAL CITIES SIGNS INC AP - 00234874 3/29/2006 CENTRAL CITIES SIGNS INC AP - 00234875 3/29/2006 CITY RENTALS AP - 00234875 3/29/2006 CITY RENTALS AP - 00234876 3/29/2006 CLABBY, SANDRA AP - 00234877 3/29/2006 CLARANCE CONZELMAN AP - 00234878 3/29/2006 CLAYTON, JANICE AP - 00234880 3/29/2006 COASTAL TRAINING TECHNOLOGIES CORP. AP - 00234882 3/29/2006 CONTACT ONE FUNDING CORP. AP - 00234883 3/29/2006 COOP, JENNIFER AP - 00234884 3/29/2006 CORONA CLA Y COMPANY INC AP - 00234884 3/29/2006 CORONA CLAY COMPANY INC AP - 00234886 3/29/2006 CPRS DISTRICT XI AP - 00234886 3/29/2006 CPRS DISTRICT XI AP - 00234887 3/29/2006 CPRS AP - 00234888 3/29/2006 CREATIVE MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS AP - 00234890 3/2912006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00234890 3/29/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00234890 3/29/2006 CUCAMONGA V ALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00234890 3/29/2006 CUCAMONGA V ALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00234890 3/29/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00234890 3/29/2006 CUCAMONGA V ALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00234890 3/29/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00234890 3/29/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00234890 3/29/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00234890 3/29/2006 CUCAMONGA V ALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00234890 3/29/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00234890 3/2912006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00234890 3/29/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00234890 3/29/2006 CUCAMONGA V ALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00234890 3/2912006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00234890 3/29/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00234890 3/29/2006 CUCAMONGA V ALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00234890 3/29/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00234890 3/29/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00234890 3/29/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00234890 3/29/2006 CUCAMONGA V ALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00234890 3/29/2006 CUCAMONGA V ALLEY WATER DISTRICT User: KFINCHER - Karen Fincher Page: 2 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout 81,931.86 -54.50 33.00 250.00 142.20 500.00 279.63 320.08 250,00 40.83 249.00 307.70 74.92 20.00 20.00 20.00 213.35 465.48 20.00 39.57 1,000.00 1,000.00 64.26 846.15 500.00 179.14 218.19 79.20 455.00 195.00 420,00 1,125.00 1,524,08 95.09 300.08 115.10 122.48 326.44 175.57 326.59 70.44 156.33 214.22 144.27 134.71 280.55 252.81 168.39 59.20 70.44 117.80 176.04 247.05 486.29 Current Date: 04/12/: 2 Time: 16:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/29/2006 through 4/11/2006 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00234890 3/29/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00234890 3/29/2006 CUCAMONGA V ALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00234890 3/29/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00234890 3/29/2006 CUCAMONGA V ALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00234890 3/29/2006 CUCAMONGA V ALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00234890 3/29/2006 CUCAMONGA V ALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00234890 3/29/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00234890 3/29/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00234890 3/29/2006 CUCAMONGA V ALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00234890 3/29/2006 CUCAMONGA V ALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00234890 3/29/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00234890 3/29/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00234890 3/29/2006 CUCAMONGA V ALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00234890 3/29/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00234890 3/29/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00234890 3/29/2006 CUCAMONGA V ALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00234891 3/29/2006 CUCAMONGA VENTURES LLC AP - 00234892 3/29/2006 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY AP - 00234893 3/29/2006 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES AP - 00234897 3/29/2006 DELTA MICROIMAGING INC AP - 00234899 3/29/2006 DICK, ERIC AP - 00234899 3/29/2006 DICK. ERIC AP - 00234900 3/29/2006 DIETERICH INTERNATIONAL TRUCK AP - 00234900 3/29/2006 DIETERICH INTERNATIONAL TRUCK AP - 00234901 3/29/2006 DMJM HARRIS AP - 00234901 3/29/2006 DMJM HARRIS AP - 00234902 3/29/2006 DP SOLUTIONS INC AP - 00234903 3/29/2006 DYNASTY SCREEN PRINTING AP - 00234904 3/29/2006 EBSCO AP - 00234905 3/29/2006 EDIOR, ANTHONY AP - 00234905 3/29/2006 EDIOR, ANTHONY AP - 00234906 3/29/2006 EFTYCHIOU, AUDREY AP - 00234907 3/29/2006 ELLIOT, CINDY AP - 00234907 3/29/2006 ELLIOT, CINDY AP - 00234908 3/29/2006 EMCOR SERVICE AP - 00234909 3/29/2006 ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT AP - 00234909 3/29/2006 ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT AP - 00234910 3/29/2006 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS AP - 00234910 3/29/2006 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS AP - 00234911 3/29/2006 EXCLUSIVE EMAGES AP - 00234912 3/29/2006 EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY AP - 002349 I 2 3/29/2006 EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY AP - 00234912 3/29/2006 EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY AP - 00234912 3/29/2006 EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY AP - 00234912 3/29/2006 EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY AP - 00234913 3/29/2006 FASTENAL COMPANY AP - 00234913 3/29/2006 FASTENAL COMPANY AP - 002349 I 5 3/29/2006 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP AP - 00234915 3/29/2006 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP AP - 00234915 3/29/2006 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP AP - 00234915 3/29/2006 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP AP - 002349 I 6 3/29/2006 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES AP - 00234916 3/29/2006 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES AP - 00234916 3/29/2006 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES User: KFINCHER - Karen Fincher Page: 3 Reporl:CK~AGENDA~REG]ORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout 271.21 32.24 962,74 29,83 179.25 154,88 136.01 199.08 176.63 569.19 358.40 105.24 217.27 530,15 140.77 121.88 1,000,00 656.20 11,32500 184.58 50.00 50,00 225.42 240.49 3,800.80 2,523.01 1,500.00 2,042.08 7,673.23 72.00 12.00 300.00 10,00 2.00 1,220.00 700.00 350.00 542.61 1,798,83 29.09 -21.60 144.20 -31.86 39.87 21.60 20.21 8.29 20.03 21.19 37,68 12.05 540.71 1,534.56 1,617.56 Current Date: 04112/; -.3 Time: 16.4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Al!enda Check Rel!ister 3/29/2006 through 4/11/2006 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00234916 3/29/2006 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES AP - 002349 I 6 3/29/2006 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES AP - 00234918 3/29/2006 FISHER SCIENTIFIC AP - 002349 I 8 3/29/2006 FISHER SCIENTIFIC AP - 00234918 3/29/2006 FISHER SCIENTIFIC AP - 00234920 3/29/2006 FORD OF UPLAND INC AP - 00234921 3/29/2006 FOREMOST PROMOTIONS AP - 00234921 3/29/2006 FOREMOST PROMOTIONS AP - 00234922 3/29/2006 FREY ENVIRONMENTAL AP - 00234923 3/29/2006 G AND M BUSINESS INTERIORS AP - 00234923 3/29/2006 G AND M BUSINESS INTERIORS AP - 00234925 3/29/2006 GARCIA, LLOYD AP - 00234926 3/29/2006 GARNER, CATHLEEN AP - 00234927 3/29/2006 GAYLORD BROTHERS AP - 00234927 3/29/2006 GAYLORD BROTHERS AP - 00234928 3/29/2006 GEOGRAPHICS AP - 00234928 3/29/2006 GEOGRAPHICS AP - 00234929 3/29/2006 GILLAND, MICHAEL AP - 00234930 3/29/2006 GOLDEN EAGLE MOVING SERVICES INC AP - 00234931 3/29/2006 GOLDEN WEST OIL INC AP - 00234932 3/29/2006 GOLF VENTURES WEST AP - 00234932 3/29/2006 GOLF VENTURES WEST AP - 00234932 3/29/2006 GOLF VENTURES WEST AP - 00234933 3/29/2006 GONSALVES AND SON,JOE A AP - 00234934 3/29/2006 GOVERNMENTJOBS.COM INC. AP - 00234935 3/29/2006 GRAINGER AP - 00234935 3/29/2006 GRAINGER AP - 00234935 3/29/2006 GRAINGER AP - 00234935 3/29/2006 GRAINGER AP - 00234935 3/29/2006 GRAINGER AP - 00234935 3/29/2006 GRAINGER AP - 00234936 3/29/2006 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT AP - 00234937 3/29/2006 GTSI CORP AP - 00234937 3/29/2006 GTSI CORP AP - 00234938 3/29/2006 HA, DUKKYY AP - 00234939 3/29/2006 HCS CUTLER STEEL CO AP - 00234940 3/29/2006 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC AP - 00234940 3/29/2006 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC AP - 00234940 3/29/2006 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC AP - 00234941 3/29/2006 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES AP - 00234941 3/29/2006 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES AP - 00234942 3/29/2006 HOSE MAN INC AP - 00234943 3/29/2006 HOYT LUMBER CO., SM AP - 00234944 3/29/2006 HUYNH, TRANG AP - 00234945 3/29/2006 HYDRO TEK SYSTEMS INC AP - 00234946 3/29/2006 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC AP - 00234946 3/29/2006 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC AP - 00234947 3/29/2006 IBM CORPORATION AP - 00234948 3/29/2006 IMPRESSIONS GOURMET CATERING AP - 00234949 3/29/2006 INDEPENDENT ELECTRONICS AP - 00234949 3/29/2006 INDEPENDENT ELECTRONICS AP - 00234950 3/29/2006 INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY COMPANY AP - 00234951 3/29/2006 INLAND EMPIRE BUILDERS AP - 00234953 3/29/2006 INLAND EMPIRE TOURS AND TRANSPORTATI( User: KFINCHER - Karen Fincher Page: 4 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout 868.00 540.71 604.09 286.28 80,16 73.23 182.84 155.00 3,753.10 3,032.62 640.58 500.00 66.31 46.47 84,89 1,477.25 2,083.83 350.00 1,025.74 150.00 394.47 1,554.11 155.18 3,000.00 250.00 23,23 33.49 152.77 105.42 54.63 87.08 105,16 3,268.10 0.01 67.00 46.11 82.43 82.97 337.20 94.60 120,55 81.52 244,38 309.98 219.77 127.50 576.41 194,85 5,000,00 1,560.04 607.16 36.34 15,000.00 2,091.00 Current Dale: 04/12/; 'I Time: 16:4 Check No. AP - 00234954 AP - 00234955 AP - 00234956 AP - 00234958 AP - 00234959 AP - 00234960 AP - 00234961 AP - 00234963 AP - 00234965 AP - 00234966 AP - 00234967 AP - 00234968 AP - 00234969 AP - 00234970 AP - 00234971 AP - 00234972 AP - 00234973 AP - 00234975 AP - 00234976 AP - 00234977 AP - 00234978 AP - 00234979 AP - 00234980 AP - 00234981 AP - 00234982 AP - 00234984 AP - 00234985 AP - 00234986 AP - 00234986 AP - 00234988 AP - 00234988 AP - 00234989 AP - 00234989 AP - 00234989 AP - 00234990 AP - 00234990 AP - 00234991 AP - 00234993 AP - 00234993 AP - 00234993 AP - 00234993 AP - 00234993 AP - 00234993 AP - 00234993 AP - 00234993 AP - 00234993 AP - 00234993 AP - 00234993 AP - 00234993 AP - 00234993 AP - 00234993 AP - 00234993 AP - 00234993 AP - 00234993 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Al!enda Check Rel!ister 3/29/2006 through 4/11/2006 Check Date Vendor Name Amount 3/29/2006 INTOXIMETERS INC 3/29/2006 INTRA V AlA ROCK AND SAND INC 3/29/2006 J D L ENTERPRISES INC 3/29/2006 JOBS A V AILABLE INC 3/29/2006 JT STORM DEVELOPMENT NO 2, LLC 3/29/2006 KA VALLE, CAROL 3/29/2006 KIMURA SHUKOKAI KARATE CALIFORNIA 3/29/2006 LEE- WIMBERLY, ANGELA 3/29/2006 LEO'S PARTY RENTALS 3/29/2006 LIBERTY HEATING AND AIR CONDITIONING 3/29/2006 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 3/29/2006 LIFESTYLES LANDSCAPES INC 3/29/2006 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 3/29/2006 LOS ANGELES COCA COLA BTL CO 3/29/2006 MAAT, AKUA 3/29/2006 MALCOM, PHILIP 3/29/2006 MANSOURI, lRAJ 3/29/2006 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 3/29/2006 MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE 3/29/2006 MASSAR, RYAN 3/29/2006 MATHY TILE AND MARBLE 3/29/2006 MATTHEW BENDER AND CO. INe. 3/29/2006 MCKIBBON, ANDREA 3/29/2006 MERITAGE HOMES OF CALIFORNIA 3/29/2006 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 3/29/2006 NATIONAL DEFERRED 3/29/2006 NATIONS RENT 3/29/2006 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 3/29/2006 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 3/29/2006 NIKPOUR, MOHAMMED 3/29/2006 NIKPOUR, MOHAMMED 3/29/2006 NINYO AND MOORE GEOTECHNICAL 3/29/2006 NINYO AND MOORE GEOTECHNICAL 3/29/2006 NINYO AND MOORE GEOTECHNICAL 3/29/2006 NOBLE COMPANY, R J 3/29/2006 NOBLE COMPANY, R J 3/29/2006 O'BRIEN, LISA 3/29/2006 OFFICE DEPOT 3/29/2006 OFFICE DEPOT 3/29/2006 OFFICE DEPOT 3/29/2006 OFFICE DEPOT 3/29/2006 OFFICE DEPOT 3/29/2006 OFFICE DEPOT 3/29/2006 OFFICE DEPOT 3/29/2006 OFFICE DEPOT 3/29/2006 OFFICE DEPOT 3/29/2006 OFFICE DEPOT 3/29/2006 OFFICE DEPOT 3/29/2006 OFFICE DEPOT 3/29/2006 OFFICE DEPOT 3/29/2006 OFFICE DEPOT 3/29/2006 OFFICE DEPOT 3/29/2006 OFFICE DEPOT 3/29/2006 OFFICE DEPOT 34.48 120.00 500,00 766.02 5,000,00 500.00 52.90 55.00 305.91 71.80 613.51 500.00 125.00 222.65 100.00 114.35 4,800.00 3,472.00 125,00 350.00 25.90 495.00 60.97 10.04 180,65 17,615.72 71.66 892.09 797,77 144,00 168.00 2,090,00 170,70 530.80 21,123.45 -2,112.35 34.00 -19.37 82.94 77.15 155.73 62.05 339.32 58,77 115.04 9.98 155.11 43,13 191.37 93.44 74,77 5.42 32.15 17.53 Current Date: 04/12/; 5 Time: 16:4. User: KFINCHER - Karen Fincher Page: 5 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG]ORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Check No. AP - 00234993 AP - 00234993 AP - 00234993 AP - 00234993 AP - 00234993 AP - 00234993 AP - 00234993 AP - 00234993 AP - 00234993 AP - 00234993 AP - 00234993 AP - 00234993 AP - 00234993 AP - 00234993 AP - 00234993 AP - 00234993 AP - 00234993 AP - 00234993 AP - 00234993 AP - 00234993 AP - 00234993 AP - 00234993 AP - 00234993 AP - 00234993 AP - 00234993 AP - 00234993 AP - 00234994 AP - 00234995 AP - 00234996 AP - 00234996 AP - 00234997 AP - 00234998 AP - 00234999 AP - 00235000 AP - 00235001 AP - 00235001 AP - 00235001 AP - 00235001 AP - 00235001 AP - 00235002 AP - 00235002 AP - 00235003 AP - 00235004 AP - 00235005 AP - 00235006 AP - 00235007 AP - 00235008 AP - 00235009 AP - 00235010 AP - 00235010 AP - 00235012 AP - 00235013 AP - 00235015 AP - 00235016 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Al!enda Check Rel!ister 3/29/2006 through 4/11/2006 Check Date Vendor Name Amount 3/29/2006 OFFICE DEPOT 3/29/2006 OFFICE DEPOT 3/29/2006 OFFICE DEPOT 3/29/2006 OFFICE DEPOT 3/29/2006 OFFICE DEPOT 3/29/2006 OFFICE DEPOT 3/29/2006 OFFICE DEPOT 3/29/2006 OFFICE DEPOT 3/29/2006 OFFICE DEPOT 3/29/2006 OFFICE DEPOT 3/29/2006 OFFICE DEPOT 3/29/2006 OFFICE DEPOT 3/29/2006 OFFICE DEPOT 3/29/2006 OFFICE DEPOT 3/29/2006 OFFICE DEPOT 3/29/2006 OFFICE DEPOT 3/29/2006 OFFICE DEPOT 3/29/2006 OFFICE DEPOT 3/29/2006 OFFICE DEPOT 3/29/2006 OFFICE DEPOT 3/29/2006 OFFICE DEPOT 3/29/2006 OFFICE DEPOT 3/29/2006 OFFICE DEPOT 3/29/2006 OFFICE DEPOT 3/29/2006 OFFICE DEPOT 3/29/2006 OFFICE DEPOT 3/29/2006 OPTIONS PLUS INe. 3/29/2006 ORACLE CORP 3/29/2006 OWEN ELECTRIC INC 3/29/2006 OWEN ELECTRIC INC 3/29/2006 PACIFIC TECHNICAL SERVICES INC. 3/29/2006 PADELFORD & SON INC, A J 3/29/2006 PANATTONI CONSTRUCTION INC 3/29/2006 P ARSAC 3/29/2006 PEP BOYS 3/29/2006 PEP BOYS 3/29/2006 PEP BOYS 3/29/2006 PEP BOYS 3/29/2006 PEP BOYS 3/29/2006 PIONEER RESEARCH CORPORATION 3/29/2006 PIONEER RESEARCH CORPORATION 3/29/2006 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 3/29/2006 POMONA FIRST FEDERAL 3/29/2006 PORAC LEGAL DEFENSE FUND 3/29/2006 PORT SUPPLY 3/29/2006 POUK AND STEINLE INC. 3/29/2006 POWER PLUS 3/29/2006 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 3/29/2006 PRIMA 3/29/2006 PRIMA 3/29/2006 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 3/29/2006 PSOMAS 3/29/2006 R C H CONSTRUCTION 3/29/2006 R H F INC -25.58 242,13 20,54 15.51 32.52 61.40 118.10 31.83 60.38 26.93 48.39 322.37 10.75 56.01 19,62 399.44 111.51 22,38 28,77 114.12 72.34 293.12 326.04 4.48 10.27 304.44 14,400.00 868.59 16,68 54.18 943.98 15,000.00 1,000.00 68,006.00 -71.61 60.33 8.07 5,92 8.60 399.75 44.85 2,754.95 3,656.99 96,00 538.63 8.277,08 500,00 34.20 310,00 495.00 7.00 433.17 1,000.00 137,16 04/12/; 16:4 User: KFINCHER - Karen Fincher Page: 6 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout cu;~ent Date: ~ Time: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Al!enda Check Rel!ister 3/29/2006 through 4/11/2006 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00235016 3/29/2006 R H F INC AP - 00235016 3/29/2006 R H F INC AP - 00235016 3/29/2006 R H F INC AP - 00235016 3/29/2006 R H F INC AP - 00235016 3/29/2006 R H F INC AP - 00235017 3/29/2006 R S M CONSTRUCTION INC AP - 00235018 3/29/2006 RAILS TO TRAILS CONSERVANCY AP - 00235019 3/29/2006 RAMOS, ERICA AP - 00235019 3/29/2006 RAMOS, ERICA AP - 00235019 3/29/2006 RAMOS, ERICA AP - 00235020 3/29/2006 REM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE AP - 00235021 3/29/2006 RCPF A AP - 00235022 3/29/2006 RDO EQUIPMENT COMPANY AP - 00235023 3/29/2006 REIN SCHMIDT, GARY AP - 00235024 3/29/2006 RELIABLE GRAPHICS AP - 00235025 3/29/2006 REPUBLIC ELECTRIC AP - 00235025 3/29/2006 REPUBLIC ELECTRIC AP - 00235025 3/29/2006 REPUBLIC ELECTRIC AP - 00235026 3/29/2006 REQUINTINA, CARMEN AP - 00235027 3/29/2006 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON AP - 00235028 3/29/2006 ROBERT HALF TECHNOLOGY AP - 00235028 3/29/2006 ROBERT HALF TECHNOLOGY AP - 00235028 3/29/2006 ROBERT HALF TECHNOLOGY AP - 00235028 3/29/2006 ROBERT HALF TECHNOLOGY AP - 00235029 3/29/2006 ROBLES SR, RAUL P AP - 00235029 3/29/2006 ROBLES SR, RAUL P AP - 00235030 3/29/2006 RODRIGUEZ, NORMA LINDA AP - 00235031 3/29/2006 S BAND 0 INC AP - 00235032 3/29/2006 SAFELITE GLASS CORP AP - 00235032 3/29/2006 SAFELITE GLASS CORP AP - 00235033 3/29/2006 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY AP - 00235033 3/29/2006 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY AP - 00235033 3/29/2006 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY AP - 00235034 3/29/2006 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT AP - 00235035 3/29/2006 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT AP - 00235036 3/29/2006 SBC LONG DISTANCE AP - 00235038 3/29/2006 SIGN SHOP, THE AP - 00235039 3/29/2006 SIMPLOT PARTNERS AP - 00235039 3/29/2006 SIMPLOT PARTNERS AP - 00235039 3/29/2006 SIMPLOT PARTNERS AP - 00235041 3/29/2006 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY AP - 00235041 3/29/2006 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY AP - 00235041 3/29/2006 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY AP - 00235042 3/29/2006 SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES AP - 00235042 3/29/2006 SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES AP - 00235042 3/29/2006 SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES AP - 00235042 3/29/2006 SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES AP - 00235042 3/29/2006 SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES AP - 00235042 3/29/2006 SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES AP - 00235043 3/29/2006 SOUNDZSKILZ ENTERTAINMENT AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON User: KFINCHER - Karen Fincher Page: 7 Report:CK _AGENDA_REG _PORTRAIT _ RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout 70.00 70,00 70.00 70,00 70.00 182.40 25.00 21.83 16,02 13.35 5,71 6,459.66 91.09 300,00 75.25 6,272.04 1,550.00 13,814.50 44.00 2,660.35 1,050.00 1,435.00 1,120.00 1,120.00 85.00 65.00 718.61 550.00 211.49 206.72 20,603.88 13.64 2.80 244.17 256,10 1,332.26 1,410,88 2,079,04 3,938.90 5,500.00 790.84 678.57 508.39 213,68 213.68 213.68 1,282.08 1,368.40 427.36 1,00000 1290 13.59 13.02 13.84 Current Dale: 04/12/; 7 Time: 16:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A2enda Check Re2ister 3/29/2006 through 4/11/2006 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00235048 312912006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/2912006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 312912006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3129/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/2912006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON User: KFINCHER - Karen Fincher Page: 8 Report: CK _AGENDA_REG _PORTRAIT _ RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout \3.02 100.49 13.15 13.73 \3.43 13.15 \3.02 11.83 \38.36 45.60 79.50 47.13 12,90 \3.02 13,85 16,98 17.38 \3.43 24,01 97.83 22.19 18.52 13.02 133.34 72.93 \3.70 13.02 13.02 44,24 127.95 6.45 7.85 13,02 14,57 \3,17 90.83 12.90 12.47 13.02 17.54 53.90 56.41 47.76 \3.15 \3.45 45.37 \3,]7 85.74 17.26 13.58 46.29 163.12 6.45 13.16 Current Date: 041121; <6 Time: 16A CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Al!enda Check Rel!ister 3/29/2006 through 4/11/2006 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTIIERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTIIERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON User: KFINCHER - Karen Fincher Page: 9 Report:CK _AGENDA_REG ]ORTRAIT _ RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout 17.53 13.16 14.84 12.47 13.02 12.90 14.84 18,36 12.90 12.90 157.84 12.90 12,90 102,39 13.02 13.02 12.47 12.47 13.60 12.47 12.47 123.09 50,06 27.39 13.02 71.33 13.02 12.90 47.99 902.18 160,69 59.58 13.02 14.36 13.58 70,21 52.37 1302 74.32 86.23 13.02 22.95 22,95 23,09 182.4 7 74.07 13,02 13.02 13,02 13.02 13.02 13.02 23.14 13,02 Current Date: 04/12/; 9 Time: 16:4. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Al!enda Check Rel!ister 3/29/2006 tIuough 4/11/2006 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amount AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235048 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON User: KFINCHER - Karen Fincher Page: 10 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout 43.38 14,01 12,04 13.02 13.45 13.02 13.59 13,02 57.21 13.28 13.02 93.79 106.90 156.07 13. 15 13.73 193.86 58.74 15.97 12.04 13.02 3,095.45 13,02 97.62 12.59 12.90 13.76 54.42 33.43 85,18 13.85 12.47 13.86 85.13 88,51 79.14 14.36 103.57 13.43 13.45 13.86 13,02 13.02 13.02 14.70 13.02 13.01 13.14 16.10 19.61 65.85 13.73 98.27 14.01 ----- Current Date: 04/12/= I D Time: 16:4 Check No. AP - 00235049 AP - 00235050 AP - 00235051 AP - 00235052 AP - 00235053 AP - 00235053 AP - 00235055 AP - 00235055 AP - 00235055 AP - 00235056 AP - 00235057 AP - 00235059 AP - 00235060 AP - 00235060 AP - 00235060 AP - 00235060 AP - 00235060 AP - 00235060 AP - 00235060 AP - 00235060 AP - 00235060 AP - 00235060 AP - 00235060 AP - 00235061 AP - 00235062 AP - 00235063 AP - 00235063 AP - 00235063 AP - 00235063 AP - 00235064 AP - 00235065 AP - 00235066 AP - 00235068 AP - 00235068 AP - 00235068 AP - 00235068 AP - 00235068 AP - 00235068 AP - 00235068 AP - 00235068 AP - 00235068 AP - 00235068 AP - 00235068 AP - 00235068 AP - 00235068 AP - 00235068 AP - 00235068 AP - 00235068 AP - 00235068 AP - 00235068 AP - 00235070 AP - 00235070 AP - 00235070 AP - 00235070 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Ae:enda Check Ree:ister 3/29/2006 through 4/11/2006 Check Date Vendor Name 3/29/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA RISK MANAGEMENT. 3/29/2006 SOUTHLAND SPORTS OFFICIALS 3/29/2006 SOUTHWEST MOBILE STORAGE INC 3/29/2006 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 3/29/2006 STOVER SEED COMPANY 3/29/2006 STOVER SEED COMPANY 3/29/2006 SUNSHINE GROWERS NURSERY INC 3/29/2006 SUNSHINE GROWERS NURSERY INC 3/29/2006 SUNSHINE GROWERS NURSERY INC 3/29/2006 T AND D INSTALLATIONS 3/29/2006 TELEWORKS 3/29/2006 TREBAOL, JEAN H 3/29/2006 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 3/29/2006 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 3/29/2006 TRUGREEN LAND CARE 3/29/2006 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 3/29/2006 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 3/29/2006 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 3/29/2006 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 3/29/2006 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 3/29/2006 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 3/29/2006 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 3/29/2006 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 3/29/2006 TRUNNEL, RODNEY 3/29/2006 UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION 3/29/2006 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 3/29/2006 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 3/29/2006 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 3/29/2006 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 3/29/2006 UNITED WAY 3/29/2006 UPS 3/29/2006 V ANVELZER, GAIL 3/29/2006 VELOCITA WIRELESS 3/29/2006 VELOCIT A WIRELESS 3/29/2006 VELOCIT A WIRELESS 3/29/2006 VELOCITA WIRELESS 3/29/2006 VELOCITA WIRELESS 3/29/2006 VELOCITA WIRELESS 3/29/2006 VELOCITA WIRELESS 3/29/2006 VELOCITA WIRELESS 3/29/2006 VELOCITA WIRELESS 3/29/2006 VELOCIT A WIRELESS 3/29/2006 VELOCITA WIRELESS 3/29/2006 VELOCITA WIRELESS 3/29/2006 VELOCITA WIRELESS 3/29/2006 VELOCIT A WIRELESS 3/29/2006 VELOCITA WIRELESS 3/29/2006 VELOCITA WIRELESS 3/29/2006 VELOCITA WIRELESS 3/29/2006 VELOCITA WIRELESS 3/29/2006 VERIZON 3/29/2006 VERIZON 3/29/2006 VERIZON 3/29/2006 VERIZON Amount 7,350.00 767.75 175.60 86.75 844.60 2,000.00 58.62 104.01 116.78 258.54 594.00 383.00 99.82 459.19 52,83 15,515.47 1,261.83 3,028,66 780.14 16,705.15 19,872.14 70,915.86 24,417,14 500.00 2,231.00 662.56 33.78 49,11 183,81 31.00 20.40 21.00 113.96 28.49 28.56 28,56 171.3 8 199.95 371.33 228.51 799.78 914.04 114.26 28.49 170.94 911.69 227. 92 370.37 199.43 797.73 78.40 90.31 29.36 109,24 Current Date: 04112/: / 1 Time: 16:4. User: KFINCHER - Karen Fincher Page: 11 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Check No. AP - 00235070 AP - 00235070 AP - 00235070 AP - 00235070 AP - 00235070 AP - 00235070 AP - 00235070 AP - 00235070 AP - 00235070 AP - 00235070 AP - 00235070 AP - 00235070 AP - 00235070 AP - 00235070 AP - 00235070 AP - 00235070 AP - 00235070 AP - 00235070 AP - 00235070 AP - 00235070 AP - 00235070 AP - 00235070 AP - 00235070 AP - 00235070 AP - 00235071 AP - 00235071 AP - 00235071 AP - 00235071 AP - 00235072 AP - 00235072 AP - 00235072 AP - 00235072 AP - 00235072 AP - 00235072 AP - 00235072 AP - 00235072 AP - 00235072 AP - 00235074 AP - 00235075 AP - 00235076 AP - 00235076 AP - 00235076 AP - 00235077 AP - 00235077 AP - 00235078 AP - 00235079 AP - 00235080 AP - 00235080 AP - 00235080 AP - 00235081 AP - 00235082 AP - 00235082 AP - 00235082 AP - 00235083 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Al!enda Check Rel!ister 3/29/2006 through 4/11/2006 Check Date Vendor Name 3/29/2006 3/29/2006 3/29/2006 3/29/2006 3/29/2006 3/29/2006 3/29/2006 3/29/2006 3/29/2006 3/29/2006 3/29/2006 3/29/2006 3/29/2006 3/29/2006 3/29/2006 3/29/2006 3/29/2006 3/29/2006 3/2912006 3/29/2006 3/29/2006 3/29/2006 3/29/2006 3/29/2006 3/29/2006 3/29/2006 3/29/2006 3/29/2006 3/29/2006 3/29/2006 3/29/2006 3/29/2006 3/29/2006 3/29/2006 3/29/2006 3/29/2006 3/29/2006 3/29/2006 3/29/2006 3/29/2006 3/29/2006 3/29/2006 3/29/2006 3/29/2006 3/30/2006 3/30/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 Amount VERlZON VERlZON VERIZON VERIZON VERlZON VERlZON VERlZON VERlZON VERlZON VERlZON VERlZON VERIZON VERlZON VERlZON VERlZON VERlZON VERIZON VERlZON VERIZON VERlZON VERIZON VERlZON VERlZON VERlZON WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO W ALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO W AXlE SANITARY SUPPLY W AXlE SANITARY SUPPLY W AXlE SANITARY SUPPLY W AXlE SANIT AR Y SUPPLY W AXlE SANITARY SUPPLY W AXlE SANITARY SUPPLY WAXlE SANITARY SUPPLY WAXlE SANITARY SUPPLY W AXlE SANIT AR Y SUPPL Y WESLEY, ROBERT WHITE CAP CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY XEROX CORPORATION XEROX CORPORATION XEROX CORPORATION YEE, LARRY YEE, LARRY GORKA, CRISTINA US POSTMASTER A AND A AUTOMOTIVE A AND A AUTOMOTIVE A AND A AUTOMOTIVE A G ELECTRIC CAR SPECIALISTS AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC ABC LOCKSMITHS 29.36 28.40 28.40 90.06 90.06 90.31 35,27 28.40 19.38 400.63 29.45 60.37 28.40 577.46 31.08 56.06 88.15 130.22 28.95 90.06 90.06 56.84 29.36 90.06 87.55 1,697.07 42.17 114.35 134.32 43.88 202.31 64.26 257.06 102.23 -202.31 740.24 310.10 100.00 226.26 150.53 150,53 1,794.04 18,00 20.00 300.00 11,456.95 50,00 726.19 119.83 656.91 244.10 5.66 3.62 481.22 Current Date: 04/12/; /2 Time: 16:4 User: KFINCHER - Karen Fincher Page: 12 Report: CK _AGENDA_REG _PORTRAIT _ RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Check No. AP - 00235083 AP - 00235083 AP - 00235083 AP - 00235083 AP - 00235083 AP - 00235083 AP - 00235083 AP - 00235083 AP - 00235084 AP - 00235085 AP - 00235086 AP - 00235087 AP - 00235088 AP - 00235090 AP - 00235092 AP - 00235093 AP - 00235093 AP - 00235094 AP - 00235095 AP - 00235096 AP - 00235097 AP - 00235099 AP - 00235099 AP - 00235100 AP - 00235100 AP - 00235100 AP - 00235101 AP - 00235102 AP - 00235104 AP - 00235104 AP - 00235105 AP - 00235106 AP - 00235107 AP - 00235108 AP - 00235108 AP - 00235108 AP - 00235109 AP - 00235110 AP - 00235113 AP - 00235115 AP - 00235117 AP - 00235118 AP - 00235119 AP - 00235120 AP - 00235121 AP - 00235122 AP - 00235123 AP - 00235123 AP - 00235124 AP - 00235125 AP - 00235126 AP - 00235128 AP - 00235129 AP - 00235129 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Al!enda Check Rel!ister 3/29/2006 through 4/11/2006 Amount Check Date Vendor Name 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 ABC LOCKSMITHS ABC LOCKSMITHS ABC LOCKSMITHS ABC LOCKSMITHS ABC LOCKSMITHS ABC LOCKSMITHS ABC LOCKSMITHS ABC LOCKSMITHS ABLAC ABLARD,GARY ABLETRONICS ACCELA ACUTINT AND GRAPHICS AGUIRRE, PARIS ALEXANDER HAMIL TON INSTITUTE INe. ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT ALL CITIES TOOLS ALL WELDING ALTA FIRE EQUIPMENT CO AL TA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL AMERICAN ROTARY BROOM CO. INC. AMERICAN ROTARY BROOM CO. INe. AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES ARBOR NURSERY PLUS BAND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE BAND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE BACKGROUNDS UNLIMITED BALDY FIRE AND SAFETY BARRATT AMERICAN INC BELL BUILDING MAINTENANCE COMPANY BELL BUILDING MAINTENANCE COMPANY BELL BUILDING MAINTENANCE COMPANY BERNELL HYDRAULICS INC BILL BLANCHARDS LITTLE BIG BAND BUSINESS AND LEGAL REPORTS INC CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STAT CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY FULLERTON CALIFORNIA, STATE OF CANYON ENGINEERING & GRADING CDW GOVERNMENT INe. CENTRAL CITIES SIGNS INC CENTRAL CITIES SIGNS INC CERTIFIED TOWING CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HS DISTRICT CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HS DISTRICT CHRISTENSEN, MARILYN CIVIC SOLUTIONS INC CIVIC SOLUTIONS INC 518.81 68.39 82.50 17.99 45.79 15,03 161.63 9.70 274.94 50.00 18.41 525.00 230.00 50.00 26.50 13,336.96 -1,333,70 12.93 574.30 36.27 250.00 948.20 422,65 195.97 146.31 177.00 3.35 140.08 25.97 102.36 750,00 624.00 1,000.00 23,254.00 350,00 445.00 181.44 400.00 428.58 22,723.70 25,00 22.50 50.00 146.00 26.86 570.87 137.38 358.27 225.00 378.00 511.80 318.00 7,096.50 1,417.50 Current Date: 04!J 2/; 13 Time: 16:4. User: KFINCHER - Karen Fincher Page: 13 Report:CK _AGENDA_REG ]ORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Al!enda Check Rel!ister 3/29/2006 through 4/11/2006 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00235130 4/5/2006 CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INe. AP - 00235131 4/5/2006 CLOUD, DON AP - 00235133 4/5/2006 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY AP - 00235134 4/5/2006 CONCEPT POWDER COATING AP - 00235136 4/5/2006 COSCO FIRE PROTECTION AP - 00235137 4/5/2006 COUNTING OPINIONS (SQUIRE) AP - 00235138 4/5/2006 COURT TRUSTEE AP - 00235139 4/5/2006 COURT TRUSTEE AP - 00235140 4/5/2006 COVOC CORPORATION AP - 00235141 4/5/2006 CRESCENT BUSINESS CENTER AP - 00235143 4/5/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00235143 4/5/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00235143 4/5/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP-00235143 4/5/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00235143 4/5/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00235143 4/5/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00235143 4/5/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00235143 4/5/2006 CUCAMONGA V ALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00235143 4/5/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00235143 4/5/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00235143 4/5/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00235143 4/5/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00235143 4/5/2006 CUCAMONGA V ALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00235143 4/5/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00235143 4/5/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00235143 4/5/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00235143 4/5/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00235143 4/5/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP-00235143 4/5/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00235143 4/5/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00235143 4/5/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00235143 4/5/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00235143 4/5/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP-00235143 4/5/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00235143 4/5/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00235143 4/5/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00235143 4/5/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00235143 4/5/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00235143 4/5/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00235143 4/5/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP-00235143 4/5/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00235143 4/5/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00235143 4/5/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00235143 4/5/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00235143 4/5/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00235143 4/5/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00235143 4/5/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00235143 4/5/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00235143 4/5/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00235143 4/5/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00235143 4/5/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00235143 4/5/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00235143 4/5/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00235143 4/5/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT User: KFINCHER - Karen Fincher Page: 14 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout 43.82 300.00 144.48 100.00 196.37 3,550.00 200.00 118.50 665.00 2,390.00 311.68 151.72 263.22 402.35 324.56 26.22 335.74 68.81 266.60 440.43 51.97 94.68 64,06 144.52 167.59 1,169.23 699.94 292.45 473.16 73,60 147.59 132.34 71.56 194.82 73.60 190.02 284.05 1,055.29 1,279.76 153.11 237.63 1,129.17 207.08 759.06 353,69 45.83 121.50 181.24 109.33 126.40 72.71 498.39 173.55 277.85 Current Date: 04/12/; / L.j Time: 16:4. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Al!enda Check Rel!ister 3/29/2006 through 4/11/2006 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00235143 4/5/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP-00235143 4/5/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00235143 4/5/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00235143 4/5/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00235143 4/5/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00235143 4/5/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00235143 4/5/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00235143 4/5/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00235143 4/5/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00235143 4/5/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00235143 4/5/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00235143 4/5/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00235143 4/5/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00235143 4/5/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00235143 4/5/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00235143 4/5/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00235143 4/5/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00235143 4/5/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00235143 4/5/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00235143 4/5/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP-00235143 4/5/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00235143 4/5/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00235143 4/5/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00235144 4/5/2006 CUMBERLAND, RASHONDA AP - 00235145 4/5/2006 CYBERCOM RESOURCES INC AP - 00235145 4/5/2006 CYBERCOM RESOURCES INC AP - 00235145 4/5/2006 CYBERCOM RESOURCES INC AP - 00235145 4/5/2006 CYBERCOM RESOURCES INC AP - 00235145 4/5/2006 CYBERCOM RESOURCES INC AP - 00235146 4/5/2006 D 3 EQUIPMENT AP - 00235147 4/5/2006 D 7 CONSULTING INC AP - 00235147 4/5/2006 D 7 CONSULTING INC AP - 00235149 4/5/2006 DAPPER TIRE CO AP - 00235149 4/5/2006 DAPPER TIRE CO AP - 00235150 4/5/2006 DELTA MICROIMAGING INC AP - 00235150 4/5/2006 DELTA MICROIMAGING INC AP - 00235152 4/5/2006 DIETERICH INTERNATIONAL TRUCK AP - 00235152 4/5/2006 DIETERICH INTERNATIONAL TRUCK AP - 00235152 4/5/2006 DIETERICH INTERNATIONAL TRUCK AP - 00235152 4/5/2006 DIETERICH INTERNATIONAL TRUCK AP - 00235153 4/5/2006 DOORKEYPER INC. AP - 00235154 4/5/2006 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION AP - 00235155 4/5/2006 EASI FILE MANUFACTURING CORP AP - 00235156 4/5/2006 ED'S R V REPAIR INC AP - 00235157 4/5/2006 EDIOR, ANTHONY AP - 00235158 4/5/2006 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS AP - 00235158 4/5/2006 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS AP - 00235159 4/5/2006 EZ RENTALS AP - 00235160 4/5/2006 F S MOTOR SPORTS INC AP - 00235161 4/5/2006 FAVELA, RICARDO AP - 00235162 4/5/2006 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP AP - 00235164 4/5/2006 FENCE CRAFT OF UPLAND INC AP - 00235165 4/5/2006 FILARSKY AND WATT AP - 00235166 4/5/2006 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES User: KFINCHER - Karen Fincher Page: 15 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout 55,20 4,245,38 544.99 236.43 26.18 97.33 22.89 85.92 370.49 181.37 441.95 392.70 367.49 150.51 309.84 752.35 309.80 214.54 101.80 233.87 502.33 304.01 86.02 50.00 1,575.00 1,400.00 840.00 175.00 700.00 39.36 6,600.00 1,375.00 228.40 987.26 2,751.86 501.68 -147.37 160.49 51.07 123.51 135.00 220.79 167,10 1,714.96 96,00 169,03 258.60 308.70 1.573.16 55,00 30.20 544.57 1,782.50 884.28 ---- 04/12/; 16:4 Current Date: / 5 Time: Check No. AP - 00235166 AP - 00235166 AP - 00235166 AP - 00235166 AP - 00235166 AP - 00235166 AP - 00235166 AP - 00235166 AP - 00235166 AP - 00235167 AP - 00235167 AP - 00235168 AP - 00235168 AP - 00235169 AP - 00235170 AP - 00235170 AP - 00235170 AP - 00235170 AP - 00235170 AP - 00235170 AP - 00235171 AP - 00235172 AP - 00235174 AP - 00235175 AP - 00235175 AP - 00235176 AP - 00235176 AP - 00235178 AP - 00235178 AP - 00235180 AP - 00235181 AP - 00235182 AP - 00235182 AP - 00235183 AP - 00235184 AP - 00235184 AP - 00235186 AP - 00235186 AP - 00235187 AP - 00235188 AP - 00235188 AP - 00235188 AP - 00235188 AP - 00235188 AP - 00235188 AP - 00235189 AP - 00235190 AP - 00235191 AP - 00235192 AP - 00235193 AP - 00235194 AP - 00235194 AP - 00235194 AP - 00235194 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Al!enda Check Rel!ister 3/29/2006 through 4/11/2006 Check Date Vendor Name 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 Amount FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIA TES FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOC!A TES FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES FISHER SCIENTIFIC FISHER SCIENTIFIC FLEMING ENVIRONMENTAL INC FLEMING ENVIRONMENTAL INC FOOTHILL LA WNMOWER FORD OF UPLAND INC FORD OF UPLAND INC FORD OF UPLAND INC FORD OF UPLAND 1NC FORD OF UPLAND INC FORD OF UPLAND INC FOREMOST PROMOTIONS FOREMOST FUKUSHIMA, JUDITH G AND M BUSINESS INTERIORS G AND M BUSINESS INTERIORS GAIL MATERIALS GAIL MATERIALS GARCIA, VIVIAN GARCIA, VIVIAN GILKEY, KATHLEEN GONZALES PAINTING CORP. GRAINGER GRAINGER GRANLIBAKKEN CONFERENCE CENTER AT LA GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT GUTIERREZ, BIANCA GUTIERREZ, BIANCA H2 ENVIRONMENTAL HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO HANSON, BARRYE HARALAMBOSBEVE~~GECOMPANY HCS CUTLER STEEL CO HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH HOFFINGER INDUSTRIES INC HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 840.00 840.00 840.00 1,534.56 1,228.Dl 840.00 840,00 868.00 868.00 69.51 10.73 3,350,00 12,065.51 20.11 87.19 30.7! 376.31 327.06 -46.79 225.38 242.00 479.49 3,18000 2,892.90 428.85 3,654.57 1,120.60 29.81 24.03 140.00 45.00 678.31 301.48 525.80 55.11 146.69 190.00 220.00 1,950.00 933,68 282.11 122.61 3,127.68 115.53 992.65 1,620.00 681.36 100.19 768.96 1,000.00 2,360.48 579.86 448.25 446.04 Currenl Date: 04/12/; I Ie, Time: 16:4. User: KFINCHER - Karen Fincher Page: 16 Report: CK _AGENDA_REG _PORTRAIT _ RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Al!enda Check Rel!ister 3/29/2006 through 4/11/2006 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00235194 4/5/2006 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC AP - 00235194 4/5/2006 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC AP - 00235194 4/5/2006 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC AP - 00235195 4/5/2006 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES AP - 00235195 4/5/2006 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES AP - 00235195 4/5/2006 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES AP - 00235196 4/5/2006 HOSE MAN INC AP - 00235196 4/5/2006 HOSE MAN INC AP - 00235196 4/5/2006 HOSE MAN INC AP - 00235196 4/5/2006 HOSE MAN INC AP - 00235197 4/5/2006 HOYT LUMBER CO., SM AP - 00235198 4/5/2006 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS AP - 00235199 4/5/2006 HUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN BERNARDINO V All AP - 00235 I 99 4/5/2006 HUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN BERNARDINO V All AP - 00235200 4/5/2006 HUNTINGTON HARDWARE AP - 00235201 4/5/2006 HURST, CHERYL AP - 00235202 4/5/2006 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC AP - 00235203 4/5/2006 INLAND EMPIRE MAGAZINE AP - 00235203 4/5/2006 INLAND EMPIRE MAGAZINE AP - 00235204 4/5/2006 INSIGHT DIRECT AP - 00235204 4/5/2006 1NSIGHT DIRECT AP - 00235204 4/5/2006 INSIGHT DIRECT AP - 00235204 4/5/2006 INSIGHT DIRECT AP - 00235204 4/5/2006 INSIGHT DIRECT AP - 00235204 4/5/2006 INSIGHT DIRECT AP - 00235204 4/5/2006 INSIGHT DIRECT AP - 00235204 4/5/2006 INSIGHT DIRECT AP - 00235204 4/5/2006 INSIGHT DIRECT AP - 00235204 4/5/2006 INSIGHT DIRECT AP - 00235206 4/5/2006 INTERSTATE BATTERIES AP - 00235206 4/5/2006 INTERSTATE BATTERIES AP - 00235206 4/5/2006 INTERSTATE BATTERIES AP - 00235206 4/5/2006 INTERSTATE BATTERIES AP - 00235207 4/5/2006 J D C INC AP - 00235208 4/5/2006 JACKSON HIRSH INC AP - 00235209 4/5/2006 JOBS A V AILABLE INC AP - 00235210 4/5/2006 JONES, BOB AP - 00235211 4/5/2006 KAISER FOUNDA TION HEALTH PLAN INC AP - 00235212 4/5/2006 KARATSU, ROBERT AP - 00235213 4/5/2006 KELLEY BLUE BOOK AP - 00235214 4/5/2006 KELLY EQU1PMENT AP - 00235215 4/5/2006 KIM, DANIEL AP - 00235216 4/5/2006 KINDERSTUTH, OLIVIER AP - 00235218 4/5/2006 KORANDA CONSTRUCTION AP - 00235219 4/5/2006 LALONDE, JOHN AP - 00235220 4/5/2006 LASER LINE AP - 00235221 4/5/2006 LASER TECHNOLOGY INC AP - 00235222 4/5/2006 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC AP - 00235222 4/5/2006 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC AP - 00235223 4/5/2006 LEA, ARLENE AP - 00235224 4/5/2006 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE AP - 00235226 4/5/2006 LINA AP - 00235228 4/5/2006 LOGAN SUPPLY COMPANY INC AP - 00235229 4/5/2006 LOS ANGELES COCA COLA BTL CO User: KFINCHER - Karen Fincher Page: 17 Reporl:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout 82.43 317.32 756.42 14.94 16.81 10.74 30.44 8.34 20.35 87.33 201.36 91.25 96.00 75.00 134.12 288.50 59.30 1,095.00 895.00 836.52 836.52 836,52 1,785.00 836,52 836.52 836.52 -138.06 -138.06 227.65 172.28 203.20 196.26 104.19 48,144.80 88,88 29,95 2,560.00 77,900.40 183.74 64,35 338.18 661.50 20.00 2,800,00 400,00 186.87 89.41 117.38 158.66 50,00 104,00 12,717.24 580.07 247.39 -- 04/12/; 16:4 Current Date: I 7 Time: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Al!enda Check Rel!ister 3/29/2006 through 4/11/2006 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00235230 4/5/2006 LOS ANGELES FREIGHTLINER AP - 00235231 4/5/2006 LP MASONRY AP - 00235234 4/5/2006 MANSOURI, lRAJ AP - 00235235 4/5/2006 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC AP - 00235235 4/5/2006 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC AP - 00235235 4/5/2006 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC AP - 00235235 4/5/2006 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC AP - 00235235 4/5/2006 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC AP - 00235235 4/5/2006 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC AP - 00235235 4/5/2006 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC AP - 00235235 4/5/2006 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC AP - 00235235 4/5/2006 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC AP - 00235235 4/5/2006 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC AP - 00235235 4/5/2006 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC AP - 00235236 4/5/2006 MARK CHRIS INC AP - 00235236 4/5/2006 MARK CHRIS INC AP - 00235237 4/5/2006 MARK CHRIS INC AP - 00235238 4/5/2006 MARSHALL PLUMBING AP - 00235238 4/5/2006 MARSHALL PLUMBING AP - 00235238 4/5/2006 MARSHALL PLUMBING AP - 00235238 4/5/2006 MARSHALL PLUMBING AP - 00235239 4/5/2006 MBK HOMES L TD AP - 00235241 4/5/2006 MEDTRONIC EMERGENCY RESPONSE SYSTEM AP - 00235242 4/5/2006 MERRILL, LYNN AP - 00235243 4/5/2006 MILES, SHANA AP - 00235244 4/5/2006 MOUNTAIN VIEW GLASS AND MIRROR INC AP - 00235245 4/5/2006 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR AP - 00235245 4/5/2006 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR AP - 00235246 4/5/2006 NAPA AUTO PARTS AP - 00235246 4/5/2006 NAPA AUTO PARTS AP - 00235246 4/5/2006 NAPA AUTO PARTS AP - 00235246 4/5/2006 NAPA AUTO PARTS AP - 00235246 4/5/2006 NAPA AUTO PARTS AP - 00235246 4/5/2006 NAPA AUTO PARTS AP - 00235246 4/5/2006 NAPA AUTO PARTS AP - 00235246 4/5/2006 NAPA AUTO PARTS AP - 00235246 4/5/2006 NAPA AUTO PARTS AP - 00235247 4/5/2006 NASRO AP - 00235248 4/5/2006 NATIONAL DEFERRED AP - 00235249 4/5/2006 NATIONS RENT AP - 00235250 4/5/2006 NESTOR TRAFFIC SYSTEMS AP - 00235251 4/5/2006 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS AP - 00235251 4/5/2006 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS AP - 00235251 4/5/2006 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS AP - 00235251 4/5/2006 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS AP - 00235251 4/5/2006 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS AP - 00235251 4/5/2006 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS AP - 00235251 4/5/2006 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS AP - 00235251 4/5/2006 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS AP - 00235251 4/5/2006 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS AP - 00235252 4/5/2006 NEWPORT TRAFFIC STUDIES AP - 00235253 4/5/2006 NIELSEN, NETTIE AP - 00235254 4/5/2006 NIKPOUR, MOHAMMED AP - 00235255 4/5/2006 NINYO AND MOORE GEOTECHNICAL User: KFINCHER - Karen Fincher Page: 18 Reporl:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout 34.91 23.70 4,800.00 16,544.01 6,070,93 2,789.17 4,668.58 1,090.61 803.53 542.19 812,12 770.05 604.20 138.42 93.46 33.61 26,527.95 209,00 -52.25 374,98 -93.75 1,000.00 500.00 500.00 37,50 228.05 109,76 54.40 -30.51 -80,75 148.79 22.93 -35.69 -34.22 2,77 334.14 22.09 30.00 27,285.47 67,61 33,840.00 83,87 46.28 83.87 46.28 46.28 46,28 46.28 83.87 167.74 648.00 79.40 72.00 7,826.50 Current Date: 04/12/; /? Time: 16:4. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Al!enda Check Rel!ister 3/29/2006 through 4/1 1/2006 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amounl AP - 00235256 4/5/2006 NUCCIOS NURSERIES INC AP - 00235257 4/5/2006 OFFICE DEPOT AP - 00235257 4/5/2006 OFFICE DEPOT AP - 00235257 4/5/2006 OFFICE DEPOT AP - 00235257 4/5/2006 OFFICE DEPOT AP - 00235257 4/5/2006 OFFICE DEPOT AP - 00235257 4/5/2006 OFFICE DEPOT AP - 00235257 4/5/2006 OFFICE DEPOT AP - 00235257 4/5/2006 OFFICE DEPOT AP - 00235257 4/5/2006 OFFICE DEPOT AP - 00235257 4/5/2006 OFFICE DEPOT AP - 00235257 4/5/2006 OFFICE DEPOT AP - 00235257 4/5/2006 OFFICE DEPOT AP - 00235257 4/5/2006 OFFICE DEPOT AP - 00235257 4/5/2006 OFFICE DEPOT AP - 00235257 4/5/2006 OFFICE DEPOT AP - 00235257 4/5/2006 OFFICE DEPOT AP - 00235257 4/5/2006 OFFICE DEPOT AP - 00235257 4/5/2006 OFFICE DEPOT AP - 00235257 4/5/2006 OFFICE DEPOT AP - 00235257 4/5/2006 OFFICE DEPOT AP - 00235257 4/5/2006 OFFICE DEPOT AP - 00235257 4/5/2006 OFFICE DEPOT AP - 00235258 4/5/2006 OMNIPRINT INC AP - 00235261 4/5/2006 PACIFIC TECHNICAL SERVICES INC. AP - 00235262 4/5/2006 P ACIFICARE OF CALIFORNIA AP - 00235263 4/5/2006 PAL CAMPAIGN AP - 00235264 4/5/2006 PARS AP - 00235265 4/5/2006 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC AP - 00235265 4/5/2006 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC AP - 00235265 4/5/2006 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC AP - 00235266 4/5/2006 PIERRE SPRINKLER & LANDSCAPE AP - 00235266 4/5/2006 PIERRE SPRINKLER & LANDSCAPE AP - 00235267 4/5/2006 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC AP - 00235268 4/5/2006 PROGRESSIVE BUSINESS PUBLICATIONS SPEC AP - 00235269 4/5/2006 PROJECT PROPERTY NUMBER FIVE AP - 00235270 4/5/2006 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY AP - 00235270 4/5/2006 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY AP - 00235272 4/5/2006 QUINTANA, ZITA AP - 00235274 4/5/2006 RANCHO OAKS LLC AP - 00235275 4/5/2006 RANCHO SCREEN PRINT AND EMBROIDERY AP - 00235277 4/5/2006 RAYSON WINDOW COVERINGS AP - 00235277 4/5/2006 RAYSON WINDOW COVERINGS AP - 00235278 4/5/2006 REF CONSULTING AP - 00235279 4/5/2006 REINHARDTSEN, DEBRA AP - 00235280 4/5/2006 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON AP - 00235280 4/5/2006 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON AP - 00235280 4/5/2006 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON AP - 00235280 4/5/2006 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON AP - 00235280 4/5/2006 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON AP - 00235280 4/5/2006 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON AP - 00235280 4/5/2006 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON AP - 00235280 4/5/2006 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON AP - 00235280 4/5/2006 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON User: KFINCHER - Karen Fincher Page: 19 Reporl:CK _AGENDA_REG ]ORTRAIT _ RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout 663.03 53,67 252.03 50.19 199.66 92.27 20.35 224.30 9.81 29.03 165.78 39.74 592.61 9.64 51.05 78.85 5.93 53.15 9.29 -43,24 4.27 8.14 3.78 197.00 465.50 51,350.66 189.87 3,500.00 452,30 435,77 628.02 11,159.77 -1,115.98 364.50 432.00 924.80 7.00 7.00 193,00 1,000,00 833.99 11,006 15 568.85 9,455.96 282.50 1,414.00 1,367.61 6,505.61 2,094,03 3,683.81 30.00 277.25 93,60 28,598.57 -- --- ---- Current Date: 04/1 2/; I CJ' Time: 16:4- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Al!enda Check Rel!ister 3/29/2006 through 4/11/2006 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00235280 4/5/2006 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON AP - 00235280 4/5/2006 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON AP - 00235280 4/5/2006 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON AP - 00235280 4/5/2006 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON AP - 00235280 4/5/2006 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON AP - 00235280 4/5/2006 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON AP - 00235280 4/5/2006 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON AP - 00235280 4/5/2006 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON AP - 00235280 4/5/2006 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON AP - 00235280 4/5/2006 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON AP - 00235280 4/5/2006 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON AP - 00235281 4/5/2006 RICHMOND AMERICAN HOMES AP - 00235282 4/5/2006 RJM DESIGN GROUP INC AP - 00235283 4/5/2006 ROBERT HALF TECHNOLOGY AP - 00235283 4/5/2006 ROBERT HALF TECHNOLOGY AP - 00235284 4/5/2006 RUBINO-KOEPKE, JENNIFER AP - 00235285 4/5/2006 SAFELITE GLASS CORP AP - 00235285 4/5/2006 SAFELITE GLASS CORP AP - 00235286 4/5/2006 SAMUEL, DANIELLA AP - 00235288 4/5/2006 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY AP - 00235289 4/5/2006 SAN BERNARDINO CTY CHILD SUPPORT PA YM AP - 00235290 4/5/2006 SAN BERNARDINO CTY CHILD SUPPORT PA YM AP - 00235291 4/5/2006 SAN BERNARDINO CTY CHILD SUPPORT PA YM AP - 00235292 4/5/2006 SAN BERNARDINO CTY CHILD SUPPORT PA YM AP - 00235294 4/5/2006 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT AP - 00235295 4/5/2006 SAN BERNARDINO, CITY OF AP - 00235296 4/5/2006 SANTOS, MANNY AP - 00235297 4/5/2006 SBC AP - 00235298 4/5/2006 SCHOLASTIC LIBRARY PUBLISHING AP - 00235299 4/5/2006 SCOTT, DIANA AP - 00235301 4/5/2006 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES AP - 00235302 4/5/2006 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES AP - 00235303 4/5/2006 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES AP - 00235304 4/5/2006 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES AP - 00235305 4/5/2006 SHOETERIA AP - 00235305 4/5/2006 SHOETERIA AP - 00235305 4/5/2006 SHOETERIA AP - 00235306 4/5/2006 SIGN SHOP, THE AP - 00235307 4/5/2006 SIMPLOT PARTNERS AP - 00235307 4/5/2006 SIMPLOT PARTNERS AP - 00235307 4/5/2006 SIMPLOT PARTNERS AP - 00235307 4/5/2006 SIMPLOT PARTNERS AP - 00235308 4/5/2006 SLJ PRO AUDIO SERVICES AP - 00235311 4/5/2006 SONITROL OF SAN BERNARDINO AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON User: KFINCHER - Karen Fincher Page: 20 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout 3,480.10 546,10 17.00 3,840.00 40,00 1,560.50 195.00 1,212.20 9,904,58 4,799.27 829.24 1,000.00 913.00 1,120.00 1,106.00 50.00 169.52 21 1.49 50.00 407.75 322.50 408.00 213.50 33,50 613.58 600.00 12.00 55.32 302.56 500.00 481.81 368.79 338.14 69.92 116,36 136.28 116.36 86.55 2,148.48 300.00 452.10 77 1.49 800.00 48.15 209.42 14.59 84,07 51.64 140.56 40.48 16.83 13.76 449.12 65.23 Current Date: 04112/; ;2 t) Time: 16:4. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Al!enda Check Rel!ister 3/29/2006 through 4/11/2006 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 002353 I 5 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 002353 I 5 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 002353 I 5 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHER1'l CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHER1'l CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 002353 I 5 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 002353 I 5 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 002353 I 5 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHER1'l CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON User: KFINCHER - Karen Fincher Page: 21 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout 781.7 5 781.7 5 14.44 13.76 71.79 172. II 117.64 31.94 96.88 79.08 109.31 85.14 13.76 14.89 12.47 12.04 33.96 54.09 67.28 132.51 14.31 12.90 20,02 20.02 113,92 12.60 13.03 13.02 102,19 123.20 24.23 14.03 825.48 105.04 40.12 14.32 135.07 25,61 182.52 13.33 94.37 13.60 136,52 565,78 28,70 50.35 93.41 77.65 246.20 15.06 13.76 12.47 307.13 13.33 Current Date: 04/12/: 16:4. 2 1 Time: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Al!.enda Check Rel!.ister 3/29/2006 through 4/11/2006 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 002353 I 5 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 002353 I 5 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 002353 I 5 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 002353 I 5 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 002353 I 5 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 002353 I 5 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERi'\[ CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERi'\[ CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 002353 I 5 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235315 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON User: KFINCHER - Karen Fincher Page: 22 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout 193.00 220.71 120.24 292.45 252.24 182.08 69.13 4.485,53 23,413.72 1.34 6.45 12.47 13,76 14.19 14.59 14.03 12.47 915.79 9.54 13,76 132.45 13.76 13.76 13.76 15.57 94.97 13,76 13.33 13.76 13.89 14.59 13.92 14.44 88.16 42.26 23.41 6.45 6.45 27.01 58.97 15.44 14.19 13.45 12.90 300.91 103.00 110.47 12.47 237.79 12.47 104,53 13,60 46,61 102.82 Current Date: 04/12/: -:2.2 Time: 16:4 Check No. AP - 00235315 AP - 00235315 AP - 00235315 AP - 00235315 AP - 00235315 AP - 00235315 AP - 00235315 AP - 00235315 AP - 00235315 AP - 00235315 AP - 00235315 AP - 00235315 AP - 00235315 AP - 00235315 AP - 00235315 AP - 00235315 AP - 00235315 AP - 00235315 AP - 00235315 AP - 00235315 AP - 00235315 AP - 00235316 AP - 00235317 AP - 00235318 AP - 00235320 AP - 00235321 AP - 00235322 AP - 00235323 AP - 00235323 AP - 00235323 AP - 00235324 AP - 00235325 AP - 00235326 AP - 00235326 AP - 00235327 AP - 00235327 AP - 00235329 AP - 00235330 AP - 00235331 AP - 00235331 AP - 00235332 AP - 00235333 AP - 00235334 AP - 00235334 AP - 00235335 AP - 00235335 AP - 00235336 AP - 00235337 AP - 00235337 AP - 00235338 AP - 00235339 AP - 00235340 AP - 00235341 AP - 00235342 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Al!enda Check Rel!ister 3/29/2006 through 4/11/2006 Amount Check Date Vendor Name 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SPECIALTY TECHNICAL PUBLISHERS STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY STOFA, JOSEPH SULLY-MILLER CONTRACTING COMPANY SUMMIT TRAINING SOURCE INC SUNRISE FORD SUNRISE FORD SUNRISE FORD SUNSHINE GROWERS NURSERY INC SWANSON, KURT TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS THOMSON GALE THOMSON GALE TOMARK SPORTS INC TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE INC TRUGREEN LANDCARE TRUGREEN LAND CARE TURF STAR INC TYPECARE UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR p, UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR p, UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR p, UNITED RENTALS NORTHWEST INC UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CA INC UNITED TRAFFIC UNITED WAY UPS 85.35 13.72 13.03 13.03 12.47 13.15 12.47 12,88 14,19 87.31 24,89 14.58 13.89 104.83 13.76 14.87 106.46 580.62 12.47 134.84 119.86 851.15 528.00 349.26 14.00 20,811.50 532.00 140.80 4.40 1,370,72 286.30 3,770.00 260.00 120.94 55.05 148.48 18.26 85.00 1,100.00 1,020,16 360.13 55,00 160.00 240.00 45,51 37.64 1,594.23 3,081.06 36,200.90 630.88 132.71 2,073.00 462,82 28.35 Currenl Date: 04/12/: 2 3 Time: 16:4. User: KFINCHER - Karen Fincher Page: 23 Report:CK _AGENDA_REG _PORTRAIT _ RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Check No. AP - 00235342 AP - 00235343 AP - 00235344 AP - 00235345 AP - 00235346 AP - 00235350 AP - 00235350 AP - 00235350 AP - 00235350 AP - 00235350 AP - 00235350 AP - 00235350 AP - 00235350 AP - 00235350 AP - 00235350 AP - 00235350 AP - 00235350 AP - 00235350 AP - 00235350 AP - 00235350 AP - 00235350 AP - 00235350 AP - 00235350 AP - 00235350 AP - 00235350 AP - 00235350 AP - 00235350 AP - 00235350 AP - 00235350 AP - 00235350 AP - 00235350 AP - 00235350 AP - 00235350 AP - 00235350 AP - 00235350 AP - 00235350 AP - 00235350 AP - 00235350 AP - 00235350 AP - 00235350 AP - 00235350 AP - 00235350 AP - 00235350 AP - 00235350 AP - 00235350 AP - 00235350 AP - 00235350 AP - 00235350 AP - 00235350 AP - 00235350 AP - 00235350 AP - 00235350 AP - 00235350 AP - 00235350 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Al!enda Check Rel!ister 3/29/2006 through 4/11/2006 Check Date Vendor Name 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 4/5/2006 UPS VAN NESS, MIKE V ANDERHA WK CONSULTING LLC VARNEY, SUSAN VEND U COMPANY VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON User: KFINCHER - Karen Fincher Page: 24 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Amount 69.28 28.48 8,759.55 1,000.00 104.46 83.71 43.06 207.89 469.79 29,51 19.38 159.80 58.78 27.43 27.91 27.43 29.36 19.71 29.36 178.07 19.38 90.31 19.38 21.49 27.63 19,96 29,36 29.36 28.40 85.24 90.31 90.31 469.79 90.06 90.06 28.40 29.36 117.31 90.06 19.38 19.38 28.40 19.43 318.29 29.36 90.31 19.38 90,06 30.78 367.98 387.55 42.60 29.36 577.46 Currenl Date: 04/12/: 2'1 Time: 16:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Al!enda Check Rel!ister 3/29/2006 through 4/11!2006 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00235351 4/5/2006 VERIZON AP - 00235352 4/5/2006 VERIZON AP - 00235353 4/5/2006 VICTORIA ANIMAL HOSPITAL AP - 00235354 4/5/2006 VIDEO GUYS, THE AP - 00235355 4/5/2006 VISION SERVICE PLAN CA AP - 00235356 4/5/2006 VISTA PAINT AP - 00235356 4/5/2006 VISTA PAINT AP - 00235356 4/5/2006 VISTA PAINT AP - 00235356 4/5/2006 VISTA PAINT AP - 00235357 4/5/2006 VOLM, LIZA AP - 00235358 4/5/2006 W ALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO AP - 00235358 4/5/2006 W ALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO AP - 00235358 4/5/2006 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO AP - 00235358 4/5/2006 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO AP - 00235358 4/5/2006 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO AP - 00235359 4/5/2006 WARD, DESIREE AP - 00235360 4/5/2006 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY AP - 00235360 4/5/2006 W AXlE SANITARY SUPPLY AP - 00235360 4/5/2006 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY AP - 00235361 4/5/2006 WE TIP INC AP - 00235361 4/5/2006 WE TIP INC AP - 00235361 4/5/2006 WE TIP INC AP - 00235363 4/5/2006' WILLIAMS, JAMES LEROY AP - 00235364 4/5/2006 XEROX CORPORATION AP - 00235364 4/5/2006 XEROX CORPORATION AP - 00235365 4/5/2006 YAMAHA OF CUCAMONGA AP - 00235365 4/5/2006 YAMAHA OF CUCAMONGA AP - 00235365 4/5/2006 YAMAHA OF CUCAMONGA AP - 00235366 4/5/2006 YEE, LARRY AP - 00235367 4/5/2006 YORK INDUSTRIES AP - 00235368 4/5/2006 ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY AP - 00235369 4/5/2006 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD AP - 00235370 4/5/2006 HAKIMI, SUSAN AP - 00235370 4/5/2006 HAKIMI, SUSAN AP - 00235371 4/6/2006 RIVERSIDE CO DEPT CHILD SUPPORT AP - 00235372 4/6/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00235372 4/6/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00235372 4/6/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00235372 4/6/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00235372 4/6/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00235372 4/6/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00235372 4/6/2006 CUCAMONGA V ALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00235372 4/6/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00235372 4/6/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00235372 4/6/2006 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00235372 4/6/2006 CUCAMONGA V ALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON User: KFINCHER - Kareu Fincher Page: 25 Report:CK _AGENDA_REG _PORTRAIT _ RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout 1,947.55 1,169.47 100,00 78.88 8,592.48 299.37 56.94 423.35 449.06 112,50 115.31 76,18 83.62 83.93 24.44 452,50 23.96 18.97 128.42 130.00 130.00 130.00 20.00 929.35 176.33 189.29 380.49 20.58 20.00 1,185,25 1,701.97 37.50 279.00 6\7,98 250.00 252.24 292.45 120.24 193.00 182,08 69.13 781.75 781.75 65,23 449.12 220,71 71.79 915.79 123,20 9,54 13.76 94,37 132.45 13.76 Currenl Date: 04/12/; :2 5 Time: 16:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Ae:enda Check Ree:ister 3/29/2006 through 4/11/2006 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amounl AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON User: KFINCHER - Karen Fincher Page: 26 Report:CK _AGENDA_REG _PORTRAIT _ RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout 13.76 13.76 14.89 15.57 94,97 13.76 132.51 13.33 15.06 13.76 13.89 14.59 246.20 13.92 14.44 13.02 20.02 20.02 12.90 135,07 24.23 51.64 40.12 102.19 88.16 42.26 23.41 6.45 6.45 27.01 58,97 50.35 15.44 14.19 13.45 12,90 300.91 103.00 110.47 77.65 12.47 109.31 237,79 28.70 12.47 104.53 13.60 46.61 102.82 79.08 85.35 13,03 565.78 13.72 Currenl Date: 04/12/; 2 t Time: 16:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Al!:enda Check Rel!:ister 3/29/2006 through 4/11/2006 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 0023,5376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00235376 4/6/2006 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON User: KFINCHER - Karen Fincher Page: 27 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout 13.03 13.03 12.47 13.15 67.28 13.76 14.32 14.03 12.47 12.88 14.19 87.31 140.56 12.47 24.89 14.31 25.61 14.58 13.76 13.89 96.88 104.83 13.60 13.76 14.87 105.04 106.46 13.76 825.48 580.62 12.47 31.94 4,485,53 23,413.72 12.47 134.84 119.86 1.34 209.42 6.45 12.47 113.92 172.11 33.96 182.52 12.04 13.33 307.13 93.41 14.59 13.33 84.07 13,76 14,19 Current Date: 04/12/; 27 Time: 16:4. Check No. AP - 00235376 AP - 00235376 AP - 00235376 AP - 00235376 AP - 00235376 AP - 00235376 AP - 00235376 AP - 00235376 AP - 00235376 AP - 00235376 AP - 00235376 AP - 00235376 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Al!enda Check Rel!ister 3/29/2006 through 4/11/2006 Check Date Vendor Name 4/6/2006 4/6/2006 4/6/2006 4/6/2006 4/6/2006 4/6/2006 4/6/2006 4/6/2006 4/6/2006 4/6/2006 4/6/2006 4/6/2006 Amount SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 117.64 40.48 14.44 136.52 14.59 14.03 12.47 16.83 13.76 54.09 12.60 85.14 1,642,803.85 1,642,803.85 Tolal for Check ID AP: Total for Entity: User: KFINCHER - Karen Fincher Page: 28 Report:CK_AGENDA _REG_PORTRAIT _ RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: :2 <6' Time: 04/12/; 16:4 '" 0> ~ o E 1l => o o ~ u ~ '" '" '0 '" o III Cl 1:1:; o Gl ~ E E III IlIGlE~ g g' E :;: o I: ::::I Olll(/)~ fi :IE .2 .<: coo u ~~~~ Ooll. ~ll. o ::;; ,; n w ~ '" M N N (0 en C"'l '<l" co 0 N (") N ~ ..t M ..t (") (") ::;; ,; ~.~ w o '" M LO 0) 0) '<l" N (X) (') '<l" ((l co o 0 '" ..; (") <<i ("j M 2'" .. ~.a . . c::;; N ~ m W ..,. ~ E . .... '" N 0 '" <0 ~ v. NO. 0.2 12 ~ :::to r--.: a:i . t: ~ o 0. N ~ m ~ c:i (<) oi .lIl: ell CD 0 LO co 0 O:::s IX) 0 N IX) 0 ~~~~~~g v. en. LO 0 n ~ r:: g g (") (0 '<t.0) CD N.o ..t.o N :!.2~~~~g ... III cO .0 ...... r--: 0 ~>*_mgffig M ~ g t g '" N l()_ Ol CD NN "<i.o N ... III (00000 Ill:::s co 0 0 0 0 Q.- ai ci ci ci ci ~OlOOOO ",,".0000 O' \0- O. O. ~ ~ :0. g ~ N.o .0 <O- N .I!l ~ " E o " > .E ~ c -g g. ~ c; ~ 8 0 ~ ~ II) II) () ~ 1ii ~ ~ III ~ <1l ~ ~ W (l) :> :0:;:; Q) E .~ t>> (;' ~ <( ai CJ)"E ~ '" . oct ~ ~ ::) E 1j ~ ~ :g m o Q) Q) l!! ::- ...J I..L. I..L. I- E {;- (;- ~ c . . ~ ~ << << o N M ..; ... .... N ..; ... '" ... ... o N_ ... o o ci o - '" '" .,; N ,.: .... o ,,; <D - ... - ..; M .. ,,; <D '" .,; '" <D .. .; '" ... .,; '" - ,,; <D - .I!l ~ " E ~ ~ . > .E ~" c. ." .:;;:: >. c 1rl s tIJ ~ u ~ u. ~ "u '" 00 0 .c ~ ~ s ~ ~ % e o o ~ 6 M m ., 6 <0 N a; ~ <0 6 a; <0 N a; ~ <0 6 a; <0 N a; ~ <0 6 a; .. .I!l ~ ~ o " ~ E a tl ~ ~ .E o N M ..; ... .... N ..; ... '" ... ... o N. '" N .,; .... .. ,.: .. '" ,,; <D - o ... N 0> ... ,,; .. ... ,.: '" N - .; '" - ,.: o - ;g - ... Q) CD N 'I:t 1ii ..... N C ~ ~ M o '" ... I- ai to ~ .. - '" 0> .. G.I (") M >- <D n; - u .. u: ... en I'- 0 lO C OJ ~ N :g ~ ;0 M UJ .... N .c. ci cci ~ "' ... ~ ... 0 o M ::;; ~ - M .c u :u ::;; ~ 0> ~ :u 'c Q,) :;; >- UJ ~ s ~ o ~ t- 0 E 1) => ~ <;; '" '" n; ~ "' 0 ""' . 'iij 1ii c '" ~ ~ l! ~ " ~ .;: UJ ~ . ~ =tij .S > ,,<;; :0'" .!!! (ij "(ij E >." '" ~ .!Q ~ ,,~ .~ c ~~ ~ . ,,~ Et- 1;; " > .~ ~ i" il w:.o :5 ~ 'Oe- " " 8~ c{ .~ Llitii o. o ~ N.::: ~ ~ NO ~ E .0 X E "(ij 1Jx " " '" ~ ." " ,,'" o..1i) o " 1il E ,,0 u- = >. O:!::: 0.'0 c'S (1) .go Ei ~ 0 .'" .~ ~ " '" '" u E :€ Q) ;t :Q ~~ .~ : o " E~ 8 e ~ 0. .- ~ .!Q :!: '0 0 ~~ '" 00 $ .ffi ~ ~ Cii .~ E .c. ~ 1ii E 0) ~ ~ c .s If 'u ""C c:'~ . ~ "0 C 0 &~~ .?;oiiio <3 g: ~ (ij-=O en1?~ ~I-~ ~'E~ ~~u (1) t:: ~ ~ ctI (1) :J g-E eo A '" ~ 0 t . '" o u ::::- a..2: E ~ Q) 0 enCJ)J;;; :SQ)-O .~ Q). ~ ~.ffi ~~.E ~. cO ~.E Q) u ~ ~ E ~.3 ~ "E "E ~ " ~ => E 0> U " <( .g~"E '0 0> . ~ <( E 2 in ~ . (ij Q) > :J E -= '01;; .:;: Q) Q) '6 > -:5 .!: -= cn- Q)~8 -=I-N ~ ~gN gq(ji :i!! g .g <1i ><0'0> [~02 Q)Y:l-.t::.ct1 .c_en-o I- 0 :J Q) "Eeo :>. :J :5 c .~ 0 to c o~g.3 a.. Q) N ~ ~ ~ ~-~ ~ r3 3 ~ E.~ ~ ~ (ij ~ c c .~ (/) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ .~~ IJ).!: 00-0-0 Q)enOQ) ~ ~.~ ni (ji:S a. & -g .3 ni 0 :J"E -=.~ ~ Q) ~.!Q ~~~~ o.~~~ .!:'.! c .3 ::R -gQ)'ON Q)slii::8 ~:fi ~(") c i:: ~.~ o ~ E ctI .0 .Q ~ ~ o..~ (/) (1) (1) .E -S 2 en 'Olii:6 ~ Z' 5 enO- "E Q) ~ ID Q) .c .:;: > en- 0 0 <( ;g 0.. c ~ ~ 0.2 en y-- ZC; ~ i.LN8'O ~Q;NQ) .~ .0 cO ni 2~N~ ~ 0 ~ :J S c'=; 2 enO..cctl . 0>. ~ (I) :J Ol "0 -g 12 ctI c .2 :S ~ ctI III E ctI ~ 00 00 . "'", o~ '00 "'~ '" . E E => (f) '0 . ~ U '" '" ~ '" ~ . > ~ 0 t- 0> ;11 >- a... f;J g I- 0 ~..o U :;; (jj .Q u:i:> _ t ;g g-~ ~ ~ . o E~ a. if; ~ ~ ~, ~ "- ~ ~ <D o <> ~ ;;; M o '0 o .~ . C. 0> C 'e o c. " '" m ~ ~ 1'i a N " ~ o . . o c , ~ III t/l Cl C r:: .. Gl o ~ E E E ';) III Gl Gl U Cl > :l III r:: () r:: o Ill.!!! 1i:!!:1ll r:: .2 i ~ 0 c .... t: .2 o 0 '0 ~Q..t: .- 0 () a. N " Cl ~ 0. ;OJ!! 'C. Be . '"' 2;0 ." ", .- e~ ,",0 ~l!l 'OJ!! J!! . :Ill: V> 10 o o N ... M .l: U .. '" ::!! . . ",y . c , . .- > . "'" . ." '0 o o '"' . , .. > ~ o o '" " , .. > .. i! . '"' . , .. > , . .. . . ;ili "e ~ , .. , . , . .. .. c . 5 . ~ .E " c ~ u. ~ c " S on " > .E >- u c " Cl ~ " g o o V> >- V> .. u; ::> o ;;; u o ...J ~I !I! I N V ..; <0 "' .,; ~ v, ;;; M N <0 "' .,; ~ v, M M N <0 "' <ri ~ v, ;;; M N e z ::> ~ t- V> > :;; >- o z w '" " ~ " o o ~ ~ o o o o .. "' .; ~ v. ~ M M N .. "' .; ~ ". ;;; M N' .. "' .; ~ ", ;;; .., ~ N ~ .,; "' ~ ri .. .. '! . '" E . > " '0 C . .. -0 lS , V> ro ro ~ ~ ~ ro ro ro ro ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ro ~ ~ ~ ro ro ro ro to ~ ro ~ m m ro ~ ~ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 00 ~ ID ~ ~ ~ m M ID ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 00 ~ ~ S ~ m w m ~ ~ 0 ~ 0000000 00000 0000 00000 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ * ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ * ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ lO N ID m '<t I'- (0 r? '<t 0 0 M (0 m (0 (0 l"- N (0 ro v ~ I'- ~ ~ V <0 0<0 M M I'- m v (0 (0 I'- N ~ V I'- m I'- (0 m 0 r? N I'- V V m (0 ro ~ I'- N m (0 (0 m ~ g M m m ~ 0 ~ m ~ ~ ; ~ ~ M ~ ~ to ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ N M M M M M V M N N N N N M M N M M '<t M M N M N N N M M N M o 0 0 0 moo 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 moo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N : ~ M ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ g N ~ g ~ g 0 g ~ ~ g ~ ~ re M M N M M M M M M V N N N N N V M N M M '<t ~ M N M M N N V M N M o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ g g M $ g g ~ g g g g g g g g g g g g g ~ ~ g g ~ g g g ~ g g ~oo~~oo~~oooooooooooo~rioo~o~o~~o moo m moo m ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m moo mom 0 ~ m 0 ~ 0 ~ m ~ 0 0 m ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ m moo mom 0 ~ ~ ~ NN~N NNMMM~MNNririN~NN ~M~~Nriri g g ~ g g g g g g ~ ~ g g g ~ ~ g ~ g g ~ g ~ ~ M ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 ~ N 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ro m 0 0 ri m ~ ~ Ng~~~~~~~~rog~goooo~~~~ro~~mRqR~m~~~ M~~mo~ NMm~~ ~NN~~m~~ONrnN ~rnm~~N ~~~m~~~~~~~~~~~~~m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ N ~N MMN~N NN ~ ~Nri~ MN o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 oooooociciciciciciciciciciciciooooooooooocicici o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ M M M M M M ~ ~ ~ ~ M M M M M M ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M M M M M M ~ ~ ~ ~ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ iO~~ro~N(<)?;~U3U3U3U3~r::~~~~5fN~iO~~ ~~ ~ 00000 000000000 000000000 0 0 (D (D 00 ~ ~ 00 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0000000000 0000000000 :x:::.::::::.::::.:::::.:::::w:::::w:::::w:::::w:::::w::: 0cj~0~~~000 z z z z z z z z z z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ $$$~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I.lJ .........................cocococococo~ ~~ ~~:i: :i::2:2~ 0000000000 Z Z Z zzzz zz zzzz zz z z Z Z Z Z Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c3 c3 C3 C3 C3 C3 C3 C3 C3 C3 C3 C3 C3 C3 C3 C3 C3 C3 C3 C3 C3 C3 OOOOOOOOOO...J...J...J...J...J...J...J...J...J...J...J...J...J...J...J...J...J...J...J...J...J ...J ~:! :!~~::!::!::!::!::! WWLULUW LU W ww WLU W W W W W W W W W W W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ::! ::! ::! ::! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ <( <( <( <( <(<(<(<( <( <( 0000000000000 0000000 00 lLl.l...lLu..u..u..u..u..u..u.. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W u.. u.. u.. u.. u.. l.l... u.. l.l... l.l... l.l... l.l... u.. u.. u.. u.. u.. u.. u.. u.. u.. u.. u.. u.. u.. u.. u.. u.. u.. u.. u.. u.. u.. c o c. ~ o U ~ <D '<t ~ m ~ ~ <D ~ ~ N N N N N ~ 8 g ~ g g ~ ~ g ID N N N N N N N N N ~ g g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N N M D;) ~ ~ N N N ~ ~ ~ " ~ on .. >- U C " ~ ~~~2~~ ~ oooo~~ III MMMMMM i MMMMMM u.. MMMMMM ~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~xxxxxx~~~ M M 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 M M N N N N N N N N N M M M M M M M M M M M ~ ~ N ~ '<t 00 00 N 0 ~ 00 m M ~ <:<:13?'")x~:;;x"Jxa'x~~~~~3: 1=1=r-r-mmmmOix)(~~~ M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M "' ~ 0" '" ~ ,.Q.~ l-u8 U N ~ .Q <il ~ g- o ~ Q. ~ ~ N ~ ~ , ~ ~ S ~ ~ o o ~ . > t o ~ . ~ m ~ w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '" M . ~;?f-I ~ M "'$ ~ ~ ~ ~ ro w ro m ~ ro w ~ ~ a. n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N " ';::lll 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <.) 0 '" Be N N N N N N N N N N N N (3 N m " 05 M '" '" 05 " '" '" " " '" '" ~ a. '" N " " N 0 N .Q a ~ " " " " M a " '" '" w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0. 2'" 'O . w m 0 ~ N 0 m ~I N ~I ~ ~I m ~I ~ '0 <; ;:: w 0 ~ ~.a ~ :; ~ ~ ro ro ~ ;;; 'O ~ 'O a. ~ w .. ro N m 0, ~ " " ro e", N ~ '" 0 M ro m w m ~ ~ ~ m m w .. N .. ~ ~ w 0 0 ~ w ro ~ 0 ro ~ ~I :2 ~I .. ~I ~ ~l ro ~ ~, M .. ~ .. .. N N ~ m m 0 w N ~ M '" N N M M '" '" N '" .. '" '" ..; '" ~ . ~ ',., I I I I '0 0 0 '" 'O~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ N ~- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .. N 0 0 ~ ro -" .. ~ 0 0 M M ~ 0 0 0 m w J!l'" '" '" N N '" '" '" .. M .. M M M U) ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w ro 0 0 m , 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N ro ro 0 0 m " .,; N .,; .,; .,; 0 N 0 .,; .,; .,; ,,; .,; w ..; .,; 0 ~ > 0 w 0 0 0 0 w 0 0 0 :: m w .. 'O 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 w m, w, 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 .,; <D 0 '" 0 .,; 0 0 ai .; ;:: ;:: .,; <D 0 ci ,; 0 0 m m 0 m 0 m 0 0 m ro ro ro 0 0 ~ m 0 m m 0 m 0 m 0 0, m, ro ", ". m m w ro 0 .,; oj <D ..' '" oj oj .. ..; .. .. 0' <D ci ~ ~ 0 w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N W W 0 0 0 0 :! , m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 '" ~ 0 0 0 " .. on N .,; .,; .,; on .,; " .,; .,; ;;; " " .,; 0 ..; > w ~ ;;; 0 0 0 N 0 W 0 ro w ro ro 0 0 M . N ~ N 0 0 W ~ W N, 0 0 0 w w 0 0 ro w' w' ,; ;:: ,; .,; 0 ai .,; ;;; ,; <D <D .. .. 0 ci .,; ~ ~ M ro .. ~ 0 ~ W N 0 0 0 0 0 0 w " ro m ~ ro ro m, m ro m m, N 0, o. m m w w 0 ClI Ul '" ..' oj "' '" '" oj '" oj .. .. .,; ~ <D .. N W Cl <: ~ ~ C .. CIl 0 c E CIl E E .. Ul ClI CIl <D " 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w U CIl > 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ro ::l Cl C 0 " .,; .,; .,; .,; .,; .,; .,; .,; .,; .,; 0 0 0 .,; 0 .,; 0 .0 ClI N > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'O C ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ci .,; ..; 0 ci 0 0 "' 0 ClI .... Q. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u;, ;n. 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0, 0 ~ 0 0 w w .c ~ .,; '" ,; .. .. oj '" .. oj '" .,; ..; .,; ~ ci U S .c ~ ~ 0 U C CIl L- ClI ~ C ClI 0:: .2 :;; ... 0 '0 ~'" .. .. M M M M .. .. .. 0 ~ .. .. 0 . m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ J!!e 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ll.. " " " " " " " " " " N N " ~ m .. ~ w m N 0 W N N 0> 0> N 0 , N N N N 0 N " 0 0 Q. " '" '" " " " M M " " ro '" 0 ll.. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0" a: a: 0 0 ro 0 0 O>u 0 N ro 0 '" " 0 '" '" .,; .,; ..; 0 - " 0 0 ~ w 'O 0 W ~- > " L) L) roo 0 0 N ",m .. ;:: '" ci 1 '" '" ro ro 0 t- t- w 'O. W <0 0 '" '" ..; .. ~ ..; 0 0 z z z z z z z z ~ z ~ " " V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) '" V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) L) z z '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" "' '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" UJ 0 0 t- t- t- t- t- t- t- t- t- " ~ ~ " " " " " " " " " UJ '" UJ UJ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t- V) " " !< !< !< !< !< !< !< !< ~ t- o 0 ~ z ~ " ~ 0 0 0> '" 0> Z 0> ;2 0> 0> , I I Z Z Z Z Z Z Z z E z E ,. E E E . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 '" ~ t- o ~ .!! ;2 ;2 ;2 ;2 ;2 ;2 ;2 ;2 ;2 ;2 > ;2 > => > > '" '" V) '" z '" UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ '0 UJ '0 '" '0 0 '0 '0 e e e e e e e e 0 0 0 0 0 UJ 0 '" 0 0 UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ m UJ " 0: " UJ " " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t- S '" S ~ 2 2 :E E ~ ~ ~ " 0 , , , , 0 U) ~ U) V) V) " a. 0 0 0 ~ u E 0 ~ 0 .. () is a. N ~ N W N M 0 N m ro 0 ~ 0 0 0 ;:: > <0 <0 0 N N .. ~ ~ 0 ~ <0 .'!l ~ .E ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ <.) ~ ~ " " 0 ~ ~ " ro ~ ~ ~ E ~ .!!! .!!! " " ~ ,., >- E " .u u 5 a, 8 l: l: U <( 0 " " " ~ ~ '" 0 N <0 0 <0 '" 0 V) M l: ~ <( N N 0 ~ a; <( V) L) a ro ~ .. UJ Q. a ~ <:- '" " ;\ 1! L) ~ > 0 N m UJ '" Q. ,. 1! ~ L) E ~ Q. M M M M M .. 0 0 0 <0 m ro 1ii ~ . " " " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " ro ~ N N . u; 'D ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro 0 .. ro " in :Jq~) N N M M M M M M M M 'D M e N > 0 ::l " ;;; ;;; ;;; ;;; ;;; ;;; ;;; ;;; ;;; " ;;; 0; .E ,. c " U. M U. .... V) , ~ '" ,. 0. D 0 N 0 Q> t- O 0 .0 '" U N ~ ~ . 0. .Q w > t ~ 1< 0 . U ~ . 0 E ~ 0. ~ w ~ u , ~ ~. ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ c " ~ N 0 N ~ 0 N ~ '6 c .. ,,; .; ,,; .; ci ,,; c" ~ ~ :: ~ ::\ 0 ~ ~ w" "0 ~ ~. 0 ~ u III ~ ~ .; S~ on ci ~o M ~ ~ 0 ~ .., ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N on .; on ci ~ ~ ~ III Cl ... C- M o C ~ E ~ CIl l::! III ell Co Ol UCl>-:!i :lllll-~ UC>-Cl OllllD:l ~:!i~2 gO"> S ca-;'c.o 0:: 0 u 0 -t:<(~ o 0 ~a. (3 . . 0 0 0 0 0 c ;; 0 0 0 0 0 .23: ci ci ci ci ci ~1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 E'C ci ci ci .= 0 0 0 't:l:!::: 0 0 0 .j!;: M M M " 0 CD o o N ... ~ U ... Ol :!i !~ " 0 = 0. " . so "S c . .2 'lU 00 " . c e .... 'C. .- -" ."I'" U) ~. c" .- c c" c- - " g'1ll III o z ::> u. .... U) > :;; ~ ,.. ~ () E ili E <!) ~ '" Ul ~ >- '" :i: g C ~ o ~ " . , . .!!! .. c . E ;; . > .E ." ~ ~ u. ~ ~ Q> S . Q> > E >- u ~ Q> '" ~ " is o o "' ,. "' .. iii ::> () iii u o ..J o o ci o o ci o M N ;! .; ~ o o o o o o ci o o ci o M ~ ~ .. ~ " .,: M o ~ :a B ~ , U) ~ () " " E w E " ~ '" Ul ~ >- 0 :E " C z o :ii ~ .l!l ~ ~ o u u " .. ~ o Q> ~ .!!! 0; u . ~ u; 0 '" ~ ~ 0 "S;: g ~ ,.. Ul "' ~ w oj .., m o m N o o ~ ci o m " o ~ ~ .. .., m ci m N ;0 ci N ~ '" N W ;; -0 1S , "' ~ o c. ~ o U .. Q> , " !!! >- u ~ Q> '" " iii ; ." Q> U. o o .; :: .; m ~ on N I , U) ~ ~ ~ o u .. o .. Q> ~ .. !!! >- " ~ Q> '" " iii ; ." Q> U. ~ N ,,; ~ ~o ~ "- ~ ~ , U) ~ o c. ~ o U " Q> ., .~ ~ U Q> Ul ~ ~ .. ~ e t- ~ " * on ~ ~ .; :a B ~ , "' .l!l ~ Q> E Q> e '" " ~ ~ Q> E ;; Q> > E ~ ~ oj M ~ ci ~ ~ o o ci o o ci o ~ on ~ o ~ ci " ~ .; o " M ~ ;; -0 1S , U) ;; -0 .... m w '!'. )f-1 8 :;a ~ " o . . o c , ~ 0 '" N '" '" <0 '" V V ~ ::, -< N <0 N N '" '" <0 '" <t> '" '" 6 en '" 6 '" '" '" '" .; '" 0 N V V V 0 N '" ~ _ ml 0> N V '" '" <D V '" N 00 ~ '" M ,.: .0 .; .0 .0 ri N .; <0 0- <D V '" <0 <0 0 <D '" '" ~ :5 u~ N N '" '" ~, <0 '" ~- .; ci ~ :: ~ '" '" '" '" '" ~1 *<(*<(*<t. *-<(*<4:.*<(*<(*-<(*<( 0.......0__0_ 0........-__.-__0__0__'-__ ~z~zO:z o:z-.:r:z~zo:zo:z~z 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ml :5ni 160 ::; 00 C m 01 <C -<t> "'0 "0 OON u: ~ <<l..s::re OI_ l: .- ~ o ~ '" E 00 ~ '" - ~ ,,1:.0 ~ m m UEu. oCii-c I;mm " > 'C _ I: I: ;a-w n::~.c -n:l~ o I; 0 ~lI):::E .- '" UU1l - - o ~ ~o ",u. E E ~ 00 m ~ ml I;- " '" ~o ~ a. ~~~~~~ zZZzzz '" '" '" 0> 0> 0> o><:(m<(O'l<( ~Z~Z~Z co co co C m E OJ m > .E I: I: I: o ,Q 0 :a; ro ~ .g.. .gl .Q) :0 :0 :0 000 '" '" '" ~ ~ ~ 00 00 00 '" '" '" ~ ~ ~ I- I- l- I: I: I: '" '" '" o 0 .~ ":ii .~ Qj E E E <C..ccr: <(..I:: iij(l)ii) (;)Ul '- <<l '- '- ClI U:::oU: U::u m E '" z - I: ~ o " " <C -g-g-cu"'O"'O ::I ::I C C C c l..i..LL::I::l::l :J ............LLLLLLLL cCQ)Q)ci.ci. EE~~EE c: c: Q) IV Q,) Ql 0.0.00(/)"0"'0 E E Q) Ql (l) Q) __0: a:: 0::: 0: ~-J 'C m I: "'<C ~ .~ ~ '" ,=0. " I: '" "' 00 :J m ~ 00 !!!. 'C l: o ED '" 0> o z 13 .C 1;; 6 C ~ m '" ~a:: :G "en :g~ <C ~~~~~~~~~~~~ zZzzzzzzzzzz ~ ~ ~ ~ g 0 ~~~~~~~~~~~~ 2z2z2z2z~z~z I'- f'- I'- I'- (") ;:: c c c c c c o .Q 0 0 0 .Q ~ rn ~ ~ ~ ro .Q) .Q) .9 .Ql .Ql .Ql :c :0 :0 :0 ::0 ::c 000 000 '" '" '" '" '" '" ::I ::I ::I ::I ::I ::l (/) III II) II) (I) III m m <<l m ro m Q) ~ ~ Q) Q) ~ ~ I- I- ~ ~ l- e c c c c c m ro m ro m m uo.2oo.~ "i "i ~ "i "i Qj E E E E E E ~.c~.c~.c~..c~.c~.c (I) (/) Ul (I) (I) (I) (I) (I) (I) (I) (I) (I) : ro.~ m.: m .: m .: m .: ro u..ULLUlLULLUlLUu..U 'C I: 'C ~ c U. ~ U. c: <1> 00 00 <1> :E 0:: 0. .0 X ~ UJ 00 'C I: ~ U. I: o :a E <1> 'C <1> 0:: 'C I: ~ U. rn ~ 'C ... <1> 0:: 'C l: ~ U. c: .. <1> 0:: if, 'C I: ~ U. <1> ~ I: <1> > <1> 0:: " l: '" ED (f) :J 00 <1> .~ .. 00 'C I: o "' > <1> 0:: " o u. 0:: <C u. a. 'E o .0 ~ ~ "' 0> 0> 0> "" ~ <C '" 0> 0> (f) I- Z UJ " <C ...J <C U 00 ii: J: I- :r; 00 I- Z UJ :;; I- 00 UJ > Z o z <C J: 00 <C U ...J <C I- o I- 'C l: '" E <1> 'C I: o 0. ~ 'C 2 '" 'C '5 g <1> .0 >- '" E >- <1> E 00 '" 2 '" 'C ~ :3 '" E 'C <1> 2 .. o I: <1> > '" ~ ~ " :c 3 .. C ~ o " " '" 1D " ro E >- <1> I: o E <1> ro .. c <1> g .. <1> > .E <1> .. <1> ~ I- $ o z '" < '" c . '" -< " c .. Il: ;; ." ~ .. . '" 0; u c . c " JCj-5 THE I C I T Y o F RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE: April 19, 2006 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Dan Coleman, Acting City Planner BY: Tabe van der Zwaag, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF A PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY DETERMINATION DRC2006-00295 - SMART & FINAL STORES CORPORATION - A REQUEST FOR A PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY DETERMINATION FOR A TYPE 21 OFF-SALE GENERAL ALCOHOL LICENSE FOR A SPECIAL TV FOOD STORE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND CARNELIAN STREET - APN: 0207-022-04. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the determination of Public Convenience or Necessity for Smart & Final Stores Corporation through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval, and forward a copy to the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC). ANALYSIS: A. Backqround: The Smart & Final store is located at the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Carnelian Street, as shown on the attached Site Plan (Exhibit A). The applicant's establishment specializes in general food items, restaurant supplies, and cleaning products. They do not sell videos and do not have coin-operated amusement devices. They are open from 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., Monday through Sunday. B. Requirements From Department of Alcohol Beveraqe Control: The Department of Alcohol Beverage Control (ABC) regulates the distribution of liquor licenses by setting limits on the various types of licenses in each census tract. The limits are calculated based on the ratio of liquor licenses to the population of the census tract. According to ABC staff, the off-sale and on-sale licenses in this census tract (00008.12) total five, two over the limit of three licenses. Section 23958 of the Business and Professional Code requires ABC to request a finding of Public Convenience or Necessity (PCN) from the local governing agency to approve additional licenses in census tracts that surpass the limit. The legislation ..j{) CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2006-00295 - SMART & FINAL STORES CORPORATION April 19, 2006 Page 2 purposely left the term Public Convenience or Necessity undefined so that the local legislative body, in this case the City Council, would have the greatest latitude for discretion based on the local conditions and circumstances. C. Facts to Support a Public Convenience or Necessitv Determination: The following are facts to support the requested Public Convenience or Necessity: Fact: A retailer of alcoholic beverages, specialty foods, and other related items is a common and accepted business. Fact: The site is located at the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Carnelian Street. Base Line Road is designated as a major thoroughfare, and the site is well suited for this type of business. Fact: Staff does not anticipate that the addition of alcoholic beverage sales will significantly increase traffic flow to the site. The applicant reports that they specialize in the sale of alcoholic beverages in larger quantities to the wholesale trade, thus discouraging the immediate consumption that the sales of single serving size containers often do. This, and the fact that Smart & Final closes at 10:00 p.m., should limit any negative effects the proposed sale of general alcoholic beverages will have on the surrounding neighborhood. Fact: Rancho Cucamonga residents would be afforded more convenient shopping opportunities with the addition of general alcoholic beverages to the current selection of general food items, restaurant supplies, and cleaning products of the store. CONCLUSION: Based on the above analysis, staff finds that the Off-Sale General Alcohol license (Type 21) at the site . not have a negative impact to the surrounding uses. Dan Coleman Acting City Planner DC:TV/ge Attachments: Exhibit A - Project Location Exhibit B - Aerial Map Exhibit C - Census Map Exhibit D - Alcoholic Beverage Control Application Work Sheet Resolution of Approval for Public Convenience or Necessity DRC2006-00295 3/ ~ tjDe'partment of Alcoholic Beverage contro. SUPPLEMENTAL DIAGRAM S~Ja"U . State of California ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor Instructions to Applicant: Draw a sketch of the area on which the licensed premises is or will be located Show adjacent structures and nearest cross streets. If this is an event/Of a daily license. catering authorization or miscellaneous use, show the area where sales and consumption of alcoholic beverages will occur. Post d copy of this diagram with Daily License, Ca(ering Authorization or Even( Au(horization where (he event is held. Sales and consump(ion of alcoholic beverages must be confined to (he area designa(ed in (he diagram and supervised to prevent violations of the Alcoholic Beverage Con(rol Act. 1. APPLICANT NAME (Las1:, first. middle) Smart & Final Stores Corporation (P-12) 3_ PREMISES ADDRESS (Street number and name. city, zip code) 2_ LICENSE TYPE Type 21 4. NEAREST CROSS STREET 8675 Baseline Rd., Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91730 DIAGRAM ,;. ".",. ": .' , ";>: .; . i-I'i'"' ", . .-': I ~,".' . h~ 'O'YII""!' ....IoC,.:.oI.... '," '1' . . '':' :. '.....;... " , . l. I ~~., " .jp: ..",,~.......- ., ~..~ .~6'!"''''. >:..r.:....:~~.. ~. i _~_. .~.,.-u:.-.~ . ;~ l ii i\r I :. . . ~~ ~ ~ .1 ~\' . . ,_....QJt, .~_. ~.- . ~_....."<;II~,,. .......- ... .~; ....,....:.-;.. ..-... sf'l\N:i.~ ;FIlJfL 'il\;(;,OO' ;. ., : . -1'-". , , } - ..j., ~'- Il.....:---t , ! . ,............w'....... . .-~. . ,.~o c.....w- c...........a.... 2 .( i ., .- 'I 'I' .. : ~ I ., -' '. '.~ ., .:...... "'~':~ '.".. ,... ....' ,. ". . . . .. '\... "'.. , .' '. . '\.,' .. 'r\.. ........:,.... ...:......: ~ '.' I'-r:' . , ~, I ',' '. ~I w_ .... :;--. 'E>....'eL'...;. 'Iio' .ti 'j' . 1'L'k"" .,- ....-. APPLICANT SIGNATURE DATE SIGNED FOR ABC USE ONLY CERTIFIED CORRECT PRINTED NAME INSPECTION DATE ARr:_"i::;~ i1?/()':n EXHIBIT A 32 ~' , ,,/ ,Y<'.:-~,~ . r I, / /Jfl -II C ".. ~~.,. /,f' ,(/0; , D I ~I ,: ',0 F ~ , QI -:/ /.1" .. "1 . I ( -:ltr- /, I / ' 'r'- ,.....'1]. E ' ~ f JI ",,' :i' j (t~. E.~ ) /, ,,~c u (Jr~ / 1"0 .. I" l'flJ' .----' (]! !,1' J. ~ '11l1 m> I I' J ij · , I" ~~F'< ('. . j> L~,. .,J. ,lit .. I <.,- . " ,.,. if " ~ W t- - en t- O W ., o a:: a.. ) ",,:,'; EXHIBIT B 33 ~ ... -- tn. tn CU o CU Zit) s...0) ON CUO 09 r::(C CUO -- 0 r::N CUt) >0::: so t) o -- - .c ~ c.. o ~ ~ '1'~ ~ en o . o N o .0 l~ 213~O A 'ffO ~211.s21HOO~ N3>11TlIW "C C'll o ~ Q) (ij .~ s:::...J .- Q) LLl/) ~C'll 1:: llJ -.I co an -.I E "" ;t en ~ ~ o f( r 3:: o 0:: 0:: <:( ~ "t o 'ffO 'ffM1.L21 . N N o o .~~ LIJ . S~ -.I, ,It) ~ ~~ 0 N ~i ~o eo 'ffSOIAl~21H . N "' . '~,n. -,. .g Ui7'ffBI 08'ff ,,0 .~,-..L-'-'lll:t. . L . , 1 0 '.~ .~, " "*''4< .,'. .',::t N'ffWi/1 H ; .~... E ,. ,0 .-..".,..,... .... It d~ g ~" ,OH'ft. 3 1/\ . . .~-",-_.,<,.o. ~,. N N'ff113N~'ffO ; N ~. ..' . .,~L~.~.':i'g'._. .' ~ . 3~/Hdd'ffS . CIO <II EXHIBIT C 3Y Letter of public convenience or necessity require Governing Body, / Applicant. Three time publication required:GI No ,J J.-bA)CJL II /'0[07 1 cO . d ltllOl 239. B & P APPLICATION WORK~EET .~~ ~ \: PREMISES ADDRESS: tfJfJ1t7 ~j~ &Z-9 ~aw Cu~. fA q Il'7jD ( LICENSE TYPE: 1--1 -f2tf' ~~ L CRIME REPORTING DISTRICT Jurisdiction unable to provide statistical data. Reporting District: Total number of reporting districts: Total number of offenses: A verage number of offenses per district: 120% of average number of offenses: ~ Total offenses in district: Location is within a high crime reporting district: Yes / No 2. CENSUS TRACT / UNDUE CONCENTRA TrON Census Tract: 0008.I'J--' Population: /County Ratio Number of licenses allowed: .. 8 6 Number of existing licenses: Undue concentration exists:@ No. Supervisor In vestigator EXHIBIT D Over tlJ colD 31tllS ,35 cp:OT 900c-TT-NtI[ RESOLUTION NO. 06- II () A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A DETERMINATION OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY FOR A TYPE 21 OFF-SALE GENERAL ALCOHOL LICENSE FOR A SPECIALTY FOOD STORE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BASELINE ROAD AND CARNELIAN STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0207-022-04. A. Recitals. 1. Smart & Final Stores Corporation filed an application for a Public Convenience or Necessity determination for DRC2006-00295, as described in the title of this Resolution, for a Type 21 (general off-sales) license from the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC). 2. Section 23958 of the Business and Professional Code requires the City of Rancho Cucamonga to make a determination that the issuance of the said license will service the public convenience or necessity. 3. On the 19th day of April 2006, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga reviewed said application prior to the adoption of this Resolution. 4. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced meeting on April 19, 2006, including written and oral staff reports, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. A retailer of alcoholic beverages, specialty foods, and other related items is a common and accepted business; and b. The site is located at the southwest corner of Baseline Road and Carnelian Street; Baseline Road is designated as a major thoroughfare, and the site is well suited for this type of business; and c. Staff does not anticipate that the addition of alcoholic beverage sales will significantly increase the traffic flow to the site. The applicant reports that they specialize in the sale 310 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 06- DRC2006-00295 - SMART & FINAL STORES CORPORATION April 19, 2006 Page 2 of alcoholic beverages in larger quantities to the wholesale trade, thus discouraging the immediate consumption that the sales of single serving size containers often do. This, and the fact that Smart & Final closes at 10:00 p.m., should limit any negative effects the proposed sale of general alcoholic beverages would have on the surrounding neighborhood; and d. Rancho Cucamonga residents would be afforded more convenient shopping opportunities with the addition of general alcoholic beverages to the current selection of general food items, restaurant supplies, and cleaning products of the store. 3. Based upon the findings set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council concludes that the issuance of an off-sale liquor license for Smart & Final Stores Corporation will not have a negative impact to the surrounding uses. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, and 3 above, this Council hereby determines that the issuance of an off-sale liquor license for Smart & Final Stores Corporation will service the Public Convenience or Necessity. 5. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. J1 STAFF REpORT ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Date: April 19, 2006 RANCHO CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer By: Jerry A. Dyer, Senior Civil Engineer Subject: APPROVAL OF THE PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATE AND TO AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR THE BASE LINE ROAD STREET LIGHT AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WITHIN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2001-01, TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NUMBER 16123035650/1442612-0 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the plans, specifications and estimate and authorize the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Base Line Road Street Light and Sidewalk Improvement Project within Community Facilities District 2001-01, to be funded from Account No. 16123035650/1442612-0. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS This is the City's final street improvement project in relation to the Victoria Gardens Mall development. This project will install sidewalk and street lights along the south side of Base Line Road from east of Day Creek Boulevard to west of Victoria Park Lane. The project plans and specifications were completed by staff and approved by the City Engineer. The Engineer's estimate is $127,710.00, including a 10% contingency, plus an additional $500.00 for printing services. Legal advertising is scheduled for April 25, 2006 and May 2, 2006, with a bid opening at 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, May 9, 2006, unless extended by Addenda. Respectfully submitted, i-ri~t (~Lt William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:JAD/KF:ls Attachments 3~ . HlGHlAND AVENUE VICTORIA PARK LANE PROJECT SITE BASE' ~ ~ ~ N.T.S. i ~ g ~ m i ~ f g u I ).. ~ ~ a u CHURCH ).. a FOOTHILL 8OUl.ElIARD , CITY OF RANCHO:CUCAMONGA VICINITY MAP . BASE liNE ROAD STREET LIGHT AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 31 RESOLUTION NO. () t::, - 1// A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "BASE LINE ROAD STREET LIGHT AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT PROJECT" WITHIN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2001-01 IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for "BASE LINE ROAD STREET LIGHT AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT PROJECT". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, May 9, 2006, sealed bids or proposals for the "BASE LINE ROAD STREET LIGHT AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT PROJECT" in said City. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of the BASE LINE ROAD STREET LIGHT AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT PROJECT". PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, ,--/0 RESOLUTION NO. Apri/19, 2006 Page 2 Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such deterrninations to be posted at the job site. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein before stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public work's project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set '-II RESOLUTION NO. April 19, 2006 Page 3 forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work herein before mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with labor Code Section 17773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash,' cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least 10% of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashiers' check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be 100% of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to 100% of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. On the date and at the time of the submittal of the Bidder's Proposal the Prime Contractor shall possess any and all contractor licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; Including but not limited to a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) or a combination of Specialty Class "C" licenses sufficient to cover all the work to be performed by the Prime Contractor in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto, The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code," Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. '-/2 RESOLUTION NO. April 19, 2006 Page 4 The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and payment of $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS), said $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS) is non refundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional non reimbursable payment of $15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga reserves the right to reject any or all bids. Questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids "BASE LINE ROAD STREET LIGHT AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT PROJECT" may be directed to: Jerry A. Dyer, Senior Civil Engineer at (909) 477-2740, ext. 4037. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this 19th day of April, 2006 Publish Dates: April 25 and May 2, 2006 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this 19th day of April, 2006. William J. Alexander, Mayor ATTEST: Debra J, Adams, City Clerk 43 RESOLUTION NO. April 19, 2006 Page 5 I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 19th day of April, 2006 Executed this 19th day of April, 2006, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk ADVERTISE ON: April 25 and May 2, 2006 LIt! R A N C H 0 C U C A M 0 N G A , ;~ ." ,.., :;.- ~. ", ,. ..... ~''':(.~ . 'H ;!? E N G I N E E R I N G D E P A R T M E N T :,' Staff Report DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: April 19, 2006 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Jerry Dyer, Senior Civil Engineer John Martin, Associate Engineer REJECT ALL BIDS RECEIVED FOR THE BRIDGE MAINTENANCE AND REHAB PROJECT AT HERITAGE PARK AS BEING NON-RESPONSIVE TO THE NEEDS OF THE CITY, AND APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR THE "BRIDGE MAINTENANCE AND REHAB PROJECT AT HERITAGE PARK", TO BE FUNDED FROM PARK FEES. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council reject all bids received for the Bridge Maintenance and Rehab Project at Heritage Park as being non-responsive to the needs of the City. Further it is recommended Council approve the plans and specifications for the "BRIDGE MAINTENANCE AND REHAB PROJECT AT HERITAGE PARK" and authorize the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids." BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The project will renovate, remove and replace existing barrier fencing and wooden decking for five (5) wooden bridges over Demens Channel within the confines of Heritage Park. Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on February 28, 2006, for the subject project. After opening bids, staff held discussions with the bidders. Staff determined some construction procedures were unclear. Therefore, in the best interest of the city, the construction documents have been modified and clarified. The project specifications were revised by staff and approved by the City Engineer clarifying the scope of work. The Engineer's estimate is $67,000 including a 10% contingency, plus an additional $5,000 required for Construction Administration which includes printing, survey, and soils and material testing. Legal advertising is scheduled for April 24 & May 1, 2006, with a bid opening at 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, May 16,2006. R~SpeGyullY submitted, '-...r{; {I u {{.. WilVam J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:JD:dlw '-IS CJ~ c;.~UflORJIIl.\ SJ~o[?ClJ '---\- M o(l N ~ . ..... =It. II) =It. RESOLUTION NO. 0 Cr II 2. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "BRIDGE MAINTENANCE AND REHAB PROJECT AT HERITAGE PARK" AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council to maintain certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council has prepared specifications for the maintenance of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for the" BRIDGE MAINTENANCE AND REHAB PROJECT AT HERITAGE PARK". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS Pursuant to a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council will receive at the OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK IN THE OFFICES OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ON OR BEFORE THE HOUR OF 2:00 P.M. ON Tuesday, May 16, 2006, sealed bids or proposals for the "BRIDGE MAINTENANCE AND REHAB PROJECT AT HERITAGE PARK ". in said City. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council, California, marked, "BRIDGE MAINTENANCE REHAB PROJECT AT HERITAGE PARK". Please purchase and/or direct requests for plans and specs regarding the "BRIDGE MAINTENANCE AND REHAB PROJECT AT HERITAGE PARK" project to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Engineering Counter, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91729-0807. PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the q1 Resolution No. April 19, 2006 Page 2 locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provision of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: 1. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or 2. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or 3. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or 4. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Lfg Resolution No. April 19, 2006 Page 3 Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (10%) of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be retumed to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess any and all contractors licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; including but not limited to a "Class "C-27" (Landscaping Contractor) license", in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto. qq Resolution No. April 19, 2006 Page 4 The Contractor, pursuant to the California Business and Professions Code, Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of $25.00 (TWENTY-FIVE DOLLARS), said $25.00 (TWENTY-FIVE DOLLARS) is non-refundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the pians and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional non- reimbursable payment of $10.00 (TEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reject any and all bids. Questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids for "BRIDGE MAINTENANCE AND REHAB PROJECT AT HERITAGE PARK" may be directed to: John Martin; Associate Engineer 1 0500 Civic Center Dr Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 (909) 477-2700, ext. 4077 or FAX (909) 477-2746 By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this 19th day of April, 2006. ADVERTISE ON: April 24, 2006 and May 1, 2006 50 STAFF REpORT ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Date: April 19, 2006 RANCHO CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer By: Erica Darplee, Management Analyst I Subject: APPROVAL OF THE PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATE AND TO AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR THE SOLAR SPEED DETECTION SIGN PROJECT TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NUMBER 1025001/5650-1530 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the plans, specifications and estimate and authorize the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Solar Speed Detection Sign Project, to be funded from Account NO.1 025001/5650-1530. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS This project is an attempt by the City's Engineering/Public Works Division, in cooperation with the City's Sheriff's Department, to instill further traffic calming measures citywide. The new signs will be solar-powered and will have radar capability allowing them to capture the speed of drivers twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week. This data will allow Sheriffs Deputies to patrol at times of the day where there has been a demonstrated pattern of speeding. The signs are programmable, allowing staff to post messages such as "YOUR SPEED", "SLOW DOWN", "WORK ZONE", "YOUR FINE $345", "SCHOOL ZONE", "FLOOD ALERT", etc., and can also function as an "Amber Alert" sign. A flyer describing the signs capabilities in more detail is attached to this staff report as "Exhibit A". Staff intends to install ten (10) V-Calm Speed Detection Signs with the available funding, pending Southern California Edison approval to mount the signs on existing street light poles. If permission is not granted, that number may be dramatically decreased to five or six signs due to high installation costs on separate poles. The project plans and specifications were completed by staff and approved by the City Engineer. The Engineer's estimate is $105,000.00, including a 10% contingency. Legal advertising is scheduled for April 25, 2006 and May 2, 2006, with a bid opening at 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, May 16, 2006, unless extended by Addenda. Respectfully submitted, (7:t(tud willial~, O'Neil City Engineer WJO:ED Attachments -5/ [..'1(;' VCahnT"V!\IS-120 VCalmT>'VMS-240 VCalrnT>'V!\IS-Solar Traffic Calming Device with VMS by Fortel Traffic, IlK. Forte! Tramc 's VCahn11>lVMS combines the power of a Variable Message Sign (VMS) with a Traffic Calming, driver teedback sign. Easily program cllstom meSs.lges or graphics sllch as: ,j YOUR SPEED, SLOW DOWN, WORK ZONE, '{OUR FINE i S345, TOLL $2.50, PED XING, SCHOOL lONE. FLOOD \. Q ALERT, BLACK ICE. ICY ROADS. elC, j " J. Adding Forlers hardened, wireless modem makes the VCalm1" VMS AMBER ALERT "Ready" and provides remote accessibil- ity 10 updale messages and download dam. Applications: I. Tmffic Calming Driver AW3rcn~s Sign (slow$ down tr..tTlc wilhoUI rood ob>tmetions) 2, Warning Sign rOT we-.nhcr related rood conditiolls, s<XlIIi!y alens. tloods. cle. 3.('ondl,10Ilal or Vnriablc Sp_'Cd Unlit S1~n d"playin~ reduced spced limi! in wor\; lones 'lIId :;<;hool/on,,,;, whil.: acting as" perfeClI)' synchr(Uli/cd.. , 4. FI",hing Beacon Sys!clllJor >ehoolwncs. cro"w~lks. C1C. 5, \';'Tiablc MeSS<lge Sign IVMS.lwilh etlStom IllC,"'!8C c;'p;lbilily (" Amber A lenl Public Alen sign ' 7. Work l,,)IIC S;lfel)' Si):n ptOlcclSroad workcp.; <llld'aIcns !hellllO ulIsafc drivers - ~,Tr"lToc Oat3 Acquisition s)'Si~'lIl \TDAS} CO"II" vchicles and logs . ' , lllin'nklX speeds. \ \ t\ .- j t: , ,\ " n " , i " ! 'i, ';i >'- . 1~ '" ~. , ~ 'I 1'1 V . J1 I"! Features: - New SO Card pon ror "IS)' progmllUning'downloads and :'LJ>cr- rnclldl)''' oper;llioll. COllllllLJnicalC wilh sign rr(m. TOC,TMC, si~nal shop or olTIce. - PI) Auxiliary Contact CloslIfl.'s for accl.:ssmlcs SHch as: C;lIll1.."ra. Strobe Light. FIas.hing Beacolls, l;l.'>CI (LJD:\R), t)l' illlandcm WITh AlJlolllatic FI:JMging Assis:t;lIlCC D~\IC\.~S.l:\FAD). c.xistillJ..: lx,:acoll limc-cl,X'h. alld more:. - t\.lul1iplc L>clcction ^'1cthods inchldc f\..Balld f~ld;.r (sl:lIldard}. 1:ISCf (LJDf\R). inductive loops (up 10 Itl) :!lKI nud 11lf.J.l:y .\,2:\:-\ hir'.h. ilHCllsilY. :Ilnhcr (AUfIGaP> LEDs make V(',llllll \1\'"1\fS [lIe Briglllcs'l and t\.10S1 ViSciblc sign with a vic,\ ill~ di~tal1(e ,,1( up III I. too feel. - REDUCED POWER CONSUMPTION Propriel:>f)' P\\.'1\.fST'd LED sGuUling method consumC$ 50~~ less power (.pcr lumen output) than other unils. dcli\'crin~ IOfl~cr nUHimc (more aUI01l0my) for solar/battery inslallarions. - Fond's VS]JC<'d"'VMS soflware provides" Tranie Dat:. AC<~lisilion Systcm (TDAS, alld s)'slcm l1lo11itVf lhal... I. Records hiJ(h and low 'pecds (II1i'"Ill"X) !o support "bdore 31Kl afier" 'lUdics which lIIay hclp qUalifY ror Cct1aW gr.]ll! funds; 1. C oums Vehicles. 1, lugs date "lid time. 4. Record... Power Failures ~lJld LO\\ Volla,gc condilions, ). Perfonns errot-<hc~kilJg ;h~uril1g ;!ccurale downloads. f>. Has (>4K Bin sizc ror c",y d;u" l(';lIIsrcr 10 MS Excel f\1 (10 make charts :UJd ,g1'..lphSI ":' Monitors and IO~5 Battery Volt;jg~. Sol;ir ,Amps ,,"d Load Amp, - Oll-HoJrd Oinlmil1~ BIJilt-ill lillc;lr dilllllling \'ia pholO diodes w' 95 d1!lUI1HI~~ IcH:ls. I.:liJllill;llCS bulky "'or.tt' I 'Trllm('. Inc 15~.t IIJ.l1n.'ny ".trd.; .\11..11Kllll. c.\ ~_~:',ij7 1'1,,,,1<,' 1-:' 14) ~C)J _'i."-'l~1 I.., ,71.11 r"'-,_M,,~~ uri ," ",',.' ."':::'.'.' '':l1lJJI.. '1',....,1"" "J, _..1, 52 RESOLUTION NO. () to -1/ 3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "SOLAR SPEED DETECTION SIGN PROJECT" AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for "SOLAR SPEED DETECTION SIGN PROJECT". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, May 16, 2006, sealed bids or proposals for the "SOLAR SPEED DETECTION SIGN PROJECT" in said City. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of the SOLAR SPEED DETECTION SIGN PROJECT'. PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. 53 RESOLUTION NO. April 19, 2006 Page 2 Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein before stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777,6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public work's project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777,6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices, Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. 5'-1 RESOLUTION NO. April 19, 2006 Page 3 The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work herein before mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic IS required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 177738. The bidder must submit. with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least 10% of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashiers' check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be 100% of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to 100% of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. On the date and at the time of the submittal of the Bidder's Proposal the Prime Contractor shall possess any and all contractor licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; Including but not limited to a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) or a combination of Specialty Class "C" licenses sufficient to cover all the work to be performed by the Prime Contractor in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code," Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho 5~ RESOLUTION NO. April 19, 2006 Page 4 Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and payment of $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS), said $35,00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS) is non refundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional non reimbursable payment of $15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga reserves the right to reject any or all bids. Questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids "SOLAR SPEED DETECTION SIGN PROJECT" may be directed to: Erica Darplee, Management Analyst I at (909) 477-2740, ext. 4014. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this 19th day of April, 2006 Publish Dates: April 25 and May 2, 2006 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this 19th day of April, 2006. . William J. Alexander, Mayor ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 19th day of April, 2006 50 RESOLUTION NO. April 19, 2006 Page 5 Executed this 19th day of April, 2006, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk ADVERTISE ON: April 25 and May 2, 2006 57 STAFF REpORT ENGINEEIUNG DEPARTMENT Date: April 19, 2006 RANCHO CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer By: Maria E. Perez, Associate Engineer Subject: AUTHORIZE AN APPROPRIATION OF $5,000.00 FOR DESIGN SURVEY AND PRINTING OF WILSON AVENUE STREET WIDENING AND REHABILITATION FROM ARCHIBALD AVENUE TO AMETHYST AVENUE TO ACCOUNT NUMBER 11723035650/1586172-0 TO BE FUNDED FROM GAS TAX/PROPOSITION 2106- 2107 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the authorization of an appropriation of $5,000.00 into Account No. 11243035650/1398124-0 to be funded from Gas Taxi Proposition 2106-2107 for the design survey and printing of Wilson Avenue Street Widening and Rehabilitation from Archibald Avenue to Amethyst Avenue. BACKGROUND Tract 16430, located at the northwest corner of Archibald Avenue and Wilson, recently completed frontage improvements. The block has been widened except for one lot. Staff is working with the owners to provide on site corrections that will accommodate the necessary widening. The subject appropriation will provide for design survey and printing of the plans when complete. Staff anticipates construction to begin late summer. Respectfully submitted, Cft?Zud William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:MEP Attachments 5~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY SERVICES Staff Report DATE: TO: FROM: April 19, 2006 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director Joe O'Neil, City Engineer Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III Karen McGuire-Emery, Senior Park Planner PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE BY: SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATION: In accordance with the City Council's request to become more informed of park and recreation facility issues, programs, projects and events, this report is provided to highlight pertinent issues, projects and programs occurring in the Community Services Department and the Park Design/Development and Maintenance Sections of Engineering. This report is provided to the City Council for informational purposes only. No action need be taken on this item. A. PARKS AND FACILITIES UPDATE Rancho Cucamonga Cultural Center Project: · Interior construction proceeding well. Basement -Starting to install millwork. Painting the walls in the back of house and stage area. Theater East and West - Installing bathroom tile. Painting the walls and ceiling. Theater Lobby - Handrail installed in the mezzanine. Painting walls. Theater - Painting theater walls and doorframes. Event Center -Painting walls. Library - Working on Tree of Knowledge Installation. Library Lobby - Painting walls. Site - Progress slow. To date have lost 4+ weeks on site work due to rain. Grading Arbor Court area. Beryl Park Screen Project: . Work has been delayed due to the rain. B. COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE 51 Mayor and Members of the City Council Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update April 19, 2006 Seniors: · The Senior Advisory Committee will hold its next regular meeting on Monday, April 24, 2006 at 9:00 a.m. at the James L. Brulte Senior Center. This month the committee will discuss the establishment of a Classic Car Show Fundraiser. . The Senior Center is hosting its monthly Senior Billiards Tournament on Friday, May 5, 2006, 1:00 p.m. Last month we had a full house with 16 entries and a great turn out of spectators. This double elimination tournament feature refreshments, cash prizes and great play. . The Rancho Cucamonga V.I.P. Club held their annual Card Party at the Senior Center on Saturday, April 15, 2006, at 10:00 a.m. Participants played their favorite card games, played bingo, ate lunch and had lots of fun. This event is a fund raising event for the V.I.P. Club. . The Senior Center will host a Mother's Dav Tea on Friday, May 12, 2006, at 3:30 p.m. We will honor those mothers and grandmothers that are unable to share this special day with their children. Our senior Moms will enjoy warm company, good food and great entertainment. Reservations are required as seating is limited. Trips and Tours: · The Flower Fields of Carlsbad - Saturday, April 220d - The first stop on this colorful trip will be at the Flower Fields in Carlsbad. Participants can see the rainbow of colors in the rows of giant Tecolote Ranunculas on the hillside. Next a wagon ride will take participants to the top of the hill, where on a clear day you can see the Pacific Ocean as well as the flower fields. After at stop for lunch participants will travel to downtown Carls bad for some shopping. Cost: $60.00 per person. · Fallbrook, Friday, May 5, 2006. Enjoy a day at the beautiful Grand Tradition in Fallbrook. Upon arrival you will be served scones and mini muffins with a beverage before periodic music, art and crafts, and entertainment within the gardens. There will be a guided tour of the gardens with a 30 -minute presentation on the History of the Grand Tradition. A Garden Tea buffet including dessert will be served for lunch. Cost: $70.00 per person. . Patsy Kline Tribute at the Lawrence Welk Resort - Saturday, May 6th - Participants will enjoy a buffet lunch and shopping as well as a performance at the Lawrence Welk theatre featuring some of Patsy Kline's famous hits. Cost: $70.00 per person. · California Strawberry Festival, Saturday, May 20, 2006. What better way to spend a May afternoon than at the California Strawberry Festival in Oxnard. Enjoy fabulous music, wine, arts and crafts, fantastic musical entertainment and of course, strawberries prepared every way you can image. Cost: $40.00 per person. Human Services and Volunteer Services: · "The Doctor is In" series, presented by Harvey D. Cohen, M.D., will present the following lectures at the James L. Brulte Senior Center for the months of March and April: ~ 3rd Tuesdav of each month from 12:00 pm until 1 :30 pm: (Po Mayor and Members of the City Council Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update April 19, 2006 April 18 - Heart Attack - Can You Prevent It? May 16 - Stroke - Can you prevent.it? ~ 3'd Wednesdav of each month from 7:00 pm until 8:30 pm: April 19'h - Elevated Cholesterol May 17 - Constipation and Colon Tolerance - Is II Your Thyroid? . The Rancho Cucamonga Community Collaborative will be hosting the Fifth Annual Rancho Cucamonqa Wellness Fair on Saturday, April 29, 2006, from 10:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. at Central Park. The Wellness Fair will include health screenings, wellness lectures, car seat safety checks, healthy pet information, holistic healing options, and over 70 vendors. . Resource Wall - The James L. Brulte Senior Center has a Resource area located next to the information desk that contains a wide variety of pamphlets and brochures on topics that are of interest to today's seniors and the community at large. These resources are available at no cost. Topics areas include: senior activities, trips and tours, the Link Program, volunteer organizations and senior citizen organizations. . Cell Phone Recvclinq - The Senior Center is now accepting old and unwanted cell phones as donations to be used for emergency purposes. The phone will be turned over to Phones For Life, a nonprofit organization to be distributed to those in need. To date, nearly thirty cell phones have been donated for this worthy cause. . The Bereavement Support Group" continues to meet monthly at the James L. Brulte Senior Center. It is a highly interactive class encouraging active participation. The support group is offered free of charge and is available for adults 18 and older. The class is instructed by Wally Buyer, from Inland Hospice. The group meets on the first and third Tuesday from 3:30 p.m. until 5:00 p.m. The support group is offered free of charge and is available for adults 18 and older. . USDA Food Commoditv Distribution - The San Bernardino County Food Bank, along with the City of Rancho Cucamonga, continues to distribute surplus food on the first Monday of every month to eligible residents at the James L. Brulte Senior Center. Eligibility is based on income and the size of the household. Distribution begins at 1 :30 pm on a first come, first served basis. There is a homebound delivery program for the physically disabled. Proof of residency and income are required. At the present time, food is distributed at Heritage Pointe Senior Apartments, Chaparral Mobile Home Park, Villa Pacifica, Rudolph Hendrickson, and the Olen Jones Senior Apartment complex. During the month of February 528 residents received commodities. Twenty volunteers have been utilized to pack commodities and ten volunteers have been used to deliver commodities to the homebound. Registration is now taking place to ensure continued compliance with Emergency Food Distribution Program as required by the San Bernardino County Food Bank. Registration is allowing staff to create a database of those eligible for commodities. Pet food is now being distributed every month to residents for their pets. Residents meeting the criteria for commodity eligibility will receive free food for their pets. In March, Petco donated $2,000.00 in pet food. Target has donated bags to help with distribution and delivery of the pet food. Rancho Feed and Fuel has also donated approximately 100 bags of high quality pet food. 0/ Mayor and Members of the City Council Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update April 19, 2006 . Senior Health and Wellness Proqram - Thanks to a grant from the Federal Department of Aging and Adult Services, the Senior Center continues to host a series of workshops and classes. The workshops taking place in April include topics on: Arthritis and Chronic Disease Management, Elder Abuse. The grant has also enabled the Senior Center to establish a Senior Resource Library. This library is open and features reference materials with a wide range of topics dealing with senior health and wellness issues. Seniors enjoy reading the new magazines that are arriving weekly, as well as checking out the available DVD's. The library includes an assortment of equipment including a Braille printer, a Braille labeler, Braille games, a magnifier, and a computer with special needs capability. Volunteers continue to monitor the libraries checkout system and to assist visitors with equipment available in the library. As new equipment arrives training and orientation of volunteers will be taking place. As a part of this grant, transportation is provided to the Senior Center for those in need by the Rancho Cucamonga/Fontana Family YMCA. Volunteers: . The Department's volunteer proqram is continuing to grow in numbers and in opportunities. High school students are now volunteering at Central Park to fulfill their community service hours that are need for graduation. Students are assisting with room set-ups for special events and rentals. Staff has volunteers committed to serve in the Resource Library, Commodities Distribution Program, as well as taking applications for the future Cultural Center, Wellness Fair, Animal Care Center, Playschool Graduation, and the Fourth of July Celebration. Volunteer Services hosted Operation Pet Proiect on Wednesday, March 29 at Central Park. Volunteers made blankets, dog biscuits, kitty krunchies, and toys for cats and dogs that will be taken care of at the future Animal Care Center. Information on future opportunities at the center was provided to volunteers. Staff has started work on the Citv's Annual Volunteer Recoqnition Event. The event will be held on Saturday, June 17, 2006 at Central Park. The theme for the event will be a Hawaiian Luau. Staff has many ideas for entertainment, menu items, and decorations. This will be a special acknowledgment for the City's dedicated volunteers. . Report on Volunteer Services - The table on the following page summarizes the Community Services Department volunteer usage for the month of February 2005 and fiscal year-to- date: FEBRUARY 2005 FEBRUARY 2006 #of # of # of # of Division Volunteers Hours $ Value Volunteers Hours $ Value Administration 5 15 210 5 15 210 Senior Services 66 712 9,968 104 1 ,426 19,964 Human Services 26 92 1,288 25 101 1,414 Snorts 170 3,384 47,376 132 1,632 22,848 iP2 Mayor and Members of the City Council Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update April 19, 2006 Snecial Events - - - - - - Performina Arts 8 214 2,996 20 117 1,638 Teens 40 233 3,262 39 200 2,800 Youth Proorams - - - - - - Totals 315 4,650 65,100 325 3,491 48,874 "AI $14/hour Special Needs Programs: . The Special Needs Program is hosting a Festival of Arts Contest on Saturday, May 6, 2006, at 9:30 a.m. Participants of all ages are encouraged to display their one-of-a kind art pieces in categories that will include ceramics, sculpting, painting, needlepoint, beading and mosaics. This event is co-sponsored by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Services department and the Foothill Optimist Club. . The Community Services Department will host a Special Needs Prom themed "Twilight at Central Park" on Friday, May 5,2006, starting at 5:30 p.m. Participants 14 years of age and older are invited to attend. The elegant evening will include a meal, dancing, pictures, friendship and fun. This event is co-sponsored by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Services Department and the San Bernardino County Superintendent of Schools. . The Friend of a Friend program is designed to match up parents of special needs children with parents of children with similar special needs. This program will assist parents in sharing experiences, advice and information with one another. . Creative Craftinq classes designed to increase fine motor skills and hand-eye coordination are being offered on Saturday's at the Goldy S. Lewis Community Center. Participants for these classes number between 5 and 7 per week. Crafts may include magnets, pictures and frames beading, painting, mosaic and ceramics as abilities permit. Beginning this month participants in the class will begin making items to be featured at the upcoming "Festival of the Arts" scheduled to take place in May. Youth: . The below summaries vouth proaram attendance for the month of March. Proaram Classes/Sites Registrants Attendance Plavschool 56 c1asses/4 sites 1,031 16,726 Lewis Partnership Kids Club @ Evergreen & Del Mar & Terra 4 sites 200 584 Vista & Carmel Aoartments Mobile Recreation 5 - 195 12 week oe(;odJ 03 Mayor and Members of the City Council Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update April 19, 2006 . Our Plavschool Proqram is in its final quarter of the school year. The children have gained new friends and have learned about colors and the ABC's. Participants and staff in the Playschool Program are now getting ready for our graduation in June. Priority registration for the 2006-2007 school year began on Monday, April 1 ot" at Lions Center East. . Mobile Recreation "Fun on the Run" Program - During the month of March Mobile Rec. participants enjoyed a wide variety of crafts and games. Participants enjoyed a St. Patrick's Day party that included snacks, games and contests complete with prizes. Staff from the Mobile Recreation program was present at the California and Pacific Southwest Recreation and Park Training Conference that took place in mid-March at the Ontario Convention Center. The program was showcased and gained positive feedback from surrounding communities. Our sprin~ session for Mobile Recreation "Fun on the Run" runs from through April 3rd through June 9t at the following park locations: Park Location Bear Gulch Hermosa Herita e Elena Windrows Time Frame 2:30 .m. until 5:00 .m. 2:30 .m. until 5:00 .m. 2:30 .m. until 5:00 .m. 2:30 .m. until 5:00 .m. 2:30 .m. until 5:00 .m. . The Lewis Partnership Proqram - In March, the Kids Club participated in several large Egg Hunt hosted by the Lewis Apartment Communities. The Homework Club is becoming more popular with more and more children bringin~ their homework to do with friends. Upcoming events sponsored by Lewis include: April 14t - Friday Night Live Pictures with the Bunny; April 21st - Game Day. Teens: . The table below summarizes teen proqram attendance for the month of March 2006: Attendance /Participation 772 820 34 volunteers; 22 hours 63 artici ants/18 volunteers/13 hours of service 11 volunteers/133 hours of service . March was an exciting month at the Teen Center with one of the largest college basketball tournament of year, "March Madness". A lot of activities has happening on the courts such as Basketball 21, Knock Out challenges and films. April starts off with the first "Dance-A- Thon on April 1st. The night was packed with exciting dance offs, games, music, food and prizes. The event was sponsored by 99.1 KGGI radio station. Spring break began on April 3rd and the teens had the opportunity to go to Magic Mountain on the 5th The Teen Center operated under extended hours during the week to allow teen a week of fun and relaxation at the Center. . Skate Park - On the second Thursday of the month the Teen Center Program Specialist meets with local skaters at the skate park to review rules and to discuss items of mutual tt/ Mayor and Members of the City Council Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update April 19, 2006 interest. Alta Loma Elementary School hosted a skateboard and roller blade safety assembly on March 30'h Next month safety assemblies will be held at Victoria Groves and Carlton Lightfoot elementary schools. Assemblies are presented by City staff and a skate professional. They are informative, fun and full of great safety information and demonstrations. . Teen Recreation Activitv Club (TRAG) volunteers continued their quest to touch lives of seniors this month with their monthly visit to Villa Del Ray Assisted Senior Living Home. In addition teens continued collecting non-perishable items for a local church food pantry. TRAC members will be heading to Seal Beach to work side-by-side with other concerned citizens in an effort to clean up the beach. Teens will also be collecting items to send to our troops in Kuwait. Their energy and commitment to their community and to others is commendable. Lastly, teens enjoyed a night out relaxing and playing Cosmic Bowling. . Teen Connection - High school teens volunteered with the City's Track and Field meet on Saturday, April 8th. A number of volunteer opportunities are coming up including helping with the Special Needs Prom, the Wellness Fair, the Special Needs Festival of the Arts and the springtime Movies at Victoria Gardens and Concert and Movies in the Park. . Career Expo - This program continues to grow and be well attended by teens in the community and their parents. Over 1,200 students and their parents attended the event this year that was held at Central Park. Participants have the opportunity to speak with 58 different agencies and to explore various career options. · Babvsitters/CPR Workshop - This workshop too has become very popular. The class is offered during the school year every other month beginning in September and ends in May. The class is currently taught by the Fire District and Community Services staff. Other segments of the class include: safety issues, entertainment ideas and overall child care issues. . Niqht on the Town Babvsittinq - This program was recently relocated from Lions Center East to the RC Family Sports Center and has proven to be successful because youngsters have the opportunity to play dodge ball, basketball, ping pong, video games, billiards and many other exciting activity games at the new location. The parent like the site because their children are active and enjoy coming to the new site. Youth Sports: . The table below summarizes vouth sports activities for the reporting period: Activitv # Participants Aae/Gender # Teams Pee Wee Basketball 182 3-5/bovs & qirls 24 Youth Basketball 928 8-14/bovs & qirls 116 Youth Track and Field 102 8-14/bovs & qirls N/A Cucamonga Middle School 32 8-14/boys & girls 8 (CMS) Youth Basketball Practice Cucamonga Middle School 20 8-adult N/A I (CMS) Judo &5 Mayor and Members of the City Council Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update April 19, 2006 RC Family Sports Center: . The table below provides drop-in/open plav participation at the Center for the reporting period: Activitv # Participants Adult Basketball 650 Youth Basketball 1,789 Adult Racquetball 549 Youth Racquetball 139 Adult Vollevball 17 Youth Volleyball 50 Jazzercise 1,190 Adult Sports: . The table below summarizes adult sport activities for the reporting period: Activitv # Participants # Teams Gender Softball 2,592 162 Males/Females Tennis 25 N/A Males/Females Racquetball 22 N/A Males/Females Basketball (Full Court) 200 20 Males Basketball (3-0n-3) 40 10 Males Football 88 11 Males Soccer 152 19 Males . The Sports Advisory Committee met on Wednesday, April 12, 2006. The fall (August 1, 2006 through January 31, 2007) field request information was due at this meeting. . There are four (4) adult softball tournaments scheduled for the month of March at the Epicenter and Adult Sports Park. Special Events: · Bring your blankets and lawn chairs and enjoy an evening of Movies in the Sprinqtime at Victoria Gardens. Pre-movie activities, such a games, activities and prizes will be available prior to the dusk start time for the movies. Movies will be shown each Tuesday and Thursday from May 2nd through May 25th in Chaffey Town Square at Victoria Gardens. Our line-up of movies includes: Chicken Little (rated G) on May 2nd and 4th; The Incredibles (rated PG) on May 9th and 11th; Peter Pan (rated G) on May 16th and 18th; and The Chronicles of Narnia on May 23'd and 25th. · Northtown Housing Development Corporation and the City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Services Department are proud sponsors of our annual Cinco de Mavo celebration. This year's event will take place at Old Town Park on Saturday, May 6th from 12-noon until 5:00 p.m. The event will include: entertainment, face painting, game booths, pony rides, inflatable activities for youngsters and great food. tic Mayor and Members of the City Council Parks. Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update April 19, 2006 Cultural and Performing Arts: . On March 30th over 200 hundred PAL Spotlight Donors. School Board Members. and community leaders attended our Announcement of the Inauqural Season for the Lewis Family Playhouse. The event was held at the Goldy S. Lewis Community Center and included live entertainment featuring members from the RC Community Theatre program. a multi-media presentation of the upcoming shows and the opportunity for donors to purchase series tickets for performances. . Performances of You Can't Take It With You took place during the last 2-weeks of March and on April 1st. The production was reviewed by the Daily Bulletin as a "Laugh Riot" by theatre and music critic Ralph Andrews. . The Adult Chorale Troupe and Showstoppers Youth Performance Troupe had a successful Broadway themed concert on Saturday. April 8th . Community auditions for Picnic, our spring community theatre performance took place during the month of March. Actors are currently in rehearsal. Performances will take place May 19th, 20th, 21st. 26th, and 27'h at the RC Theatre Arts Center. . This summer's familv musical, Some Enchanted Evening: the Songs of Rodgers & Hammerstein has posted a call for auditions for Thursday. May 18th and Saturday, May 20th This production will be a musical review with roles open for community members ages 8 and up. Children and adults are encouraged to audition. The show will run July 21st through 23'd and July 28th through July 30th. . Rancho Cucamonga resident and RC Community Theatre participant, Monique Le Compte (Leads in Once Upon a Mattress, The Sound of Music. As The World Goes Round) was recently one of the 12 televised finalists in TV's Nashville Star. Recreation Contract Classes: . Classes in our sprinq session began on April 1st and are continuing through June 9th. We are offering 153 classes and currently have 2,242 individuals registered with attendance in our classes topping 21.000. Facilities: · The table below illustrates the number of rentalslbookinqs and attendance fiqures for our community facilities during the month of February: Facilitv Rentals # Rentals/Bookinas Attendance Lions Center East 58 5.802 Lions Center West 317 5,860 James L. Brulte Senior Center 67/246 4.895 Goll:l'V S. Lewis Communitv Center 84/194 11.230 . Staff is continuing to meet quarterly with users of the Equestrian Center to address maintenance needs and programming. Our local riding groups include: Alta Loma Riding Club, Rancho Rebels 4-H. Rising Stars of Equestrian Therapy and Rancho Cucamonga &7 Mayor and Members of the City Council Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update April 19, 2006 Citizen Mounted Patrol. The next user group meeting is scheduled for February 15th. Our local groups are very cooperative and supportive of the City's efforts. . Park monitors keep daily reports of activities in our parks, often helping out residents in need of assistance. Parks and Facilities: . The table below provides usage information for park picnic shelters and special use facilities for the month of March 2006: Park/Shelter Attendance # Rentals Red Hill 1,114 24 Heritaae 540 12 Milliken 920 10 Hermosa 110 5 Covote Canvon 150 5 Civic Center 0 0 Courtvard Amphitheatre 50 1 TOTAL 2,884 57 Equestrian Participants:665 8 Soectators: 90 * Equestrian participants include drop-in use. Departmental I City Marketing: . Marketing efforts continue being developed and implemented for the promotion of the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center and the Promoting Arts and Literacy fundraising campaign. . Due to construction progress getting closer to completion and the impending Season Announcement information and Ticket Sales launch, in January, the "Victoria Gardens Cultural Center Spotlight News" became a monthly e-blast to over 3,000 subscribers currently in our opt-in subscriber database. . The Inaugural Season Brochure for the Lewis Family Playhouse was finalized during this period and were in mailboxes and available at City Centers and the Library, soon after the Season Announcement event that was held on March 30, 2006. . Our Season Announcement Event provided an opportunity for our Spotlight Donors, Media and special guests to hear the Inaugural Season performances at the Lewis Family Playhouse. . Multi-media presentations were created for the March 30th event that included Season Announcement pieces for our Theatre for Young Audience, Family, Specialty, and Community Theatre Series in addition to a construction video. · Various collateral materials promoting the Season Performances, Teacher School Group collateral and supporting of ticket sales to Lewis Family Playhouse performances are under development. 0g Mayor and Members of the City Council Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update April 19, 2006 . The revised website for the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center, transitioning from an informational site to a more interactive, resource for educators, with on-line ticket purchasing capabilities for the Lewis Family Playhouse was launched at the March 30, 2006 Announcement Event. Additional updates and content uploads will continue to this critical communication tool. . Multiple construction site tours have been taking place with various stakeholder groups in support of Cultural Center partners, sponsors and supporters. January - March we have hosted tours with Educator groups, Victoria Garden Merchants and Management, and potential PAL Donors. . Multiple news releases have been distributed regarding various CSD Programs and activities. Articles appeared in the Daily Bulletin and a San Gabriel Valley News Magazine Mountain Views Newspaper, and reporters have indicated additional articles are expected to appear in the Press Enterprise and LA Times soon. . KVMD TV will be taping interviews at the VGCC construction site with the Community Services Director and the Library Services Director for their show "Southern California Life" with an in-studio interview with the Mayor that is scheduled for a May airing. . Advertisements will begin in mid-April as Lewis Family Playhouse Series Tickets go on Sale with All Public Tickets being on sale as of May 1st (on-line ticketing available via the website vgculturalcenter.com ). . Coming to the completion of the promotion of the Family Wall of Art tiles as we near the construction deadline to have finished "artwork" delivered to the site for installation. Staff is diligently working to have all tiles sponsored prior to this deadline. Epicenter Rentals/Activities: . The following rental/activities took place during the reporting period: )> Quakes - Boardmember Birthday Party - March 25, 2006 - Epicenter Pavilion. )> Christian Okoye Foundation - Free Youth Soccer/Football Clinic - March 26, 2006 - Epicenter Soccer/Football Fields. . Staff is working with the following applicants for upcominq rentals and activities: )> Rancho Cucamonga Police Department - Ron Ives Memorial Bike Roadeo - April 22, 2006 - Epicenter Special Event Area. )> Daily Bulletin -In/and Valley All Star Game - June 7, 2006 - Epicenter Stadium. )> Green Diamond Entertainment - Festival of Legends Reunion Tour - June 10, 2006 - Epicenter Stadium. )> Rancho Cucamonga High School - 2006 Graduation Ceremony - June 14, 2006 - Epicenter Stadium. ~q Mayor and Members of the City Council Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update April 19, 2006 ~ Community Services Department - 4th of July Celebration - July 4, 2006 - Epicenter Stadium and Sports Fields. ~ Arrayartist - Music Festival-July 2006 - Epicenter Stadium. ~ Rancho Cucamonga Quakes - Quakes/Speedway Celebrity Softball Game - August 31, 2006 - Epicenter Stadium. ~ Preferred Businesses of America - Home & Living Expo - September 25, 2006 - October 3, 2006 - Epicenter Special Event Area (Parking Lot G). Park and Recreation Commission: . The Park and Recreation Commission next meeting will take place on April 20th The following is a list of items agendized to be discussedlacted upon at this meeting: ~ Presentation of the Inaugural Season of Performances scheduled for the Lewis Family Playhouse at the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center for the 2006/2007 season. ~ Senior Advisory Committee update. ~ Sports Advisory Committee update. ~ Update on the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center. ~ Consideration of Upward Bounds request to receive permanent field allocation during the same priority field allocation of the Youth Sports Groups. ~ Recommendation from Senior Advisory Committee regarding Membership. ~ Discussion regarding annual meeting to be held May 18, 2006, at the Central Park facility. ~ Quarterly Superintendent's update on Community Services Department programming. ~ Commissioner's update on the California and Pacific Southwest Recreation and Park Training Conference held March 16-18, 2006 at the Ontario Convention Center. ~ Review of approved park designs for Pulte Parks - Legacy Park, Olive Grove Park and Rancho Summit Park. ~ Consideration of appointments of Park and Recreation Commissioners to the various subcommittees. Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation: · The next regular meeting of the Community Foundation Board of Directors will be on June 14,2006. 'Yo Mayor and Members of the City Council Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update April 19, 2006 Kevin M Ardle Community Services Director f:ICOMMSERVlCounci/&BoardsICityCounciftStaffReportsI2006Iupdate4 19 06, doc 9:.:!tJ City Engineer 1/ STAFF REpORT ~'" " . r, ~... , " \ 'tZ "Jj1L"'" '~>- ">"'-"i)' ..)-- ""',. ~ " RANcHo CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Date: April 19, 2006 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer By: Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer Subject: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DRC2004- 00721, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF MILLIKEN AVENUE AND 7TH STREET, SUBMITTED BY FAIRWAY BUSINESS CENTRE, LLC AND MILLIKEN GREYSTONE PROPERTIES, LLC RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions accepting the subject agreement, securities and ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District NO.3B and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 and authorizing the Mayor to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS DRC2004-00721, located at the northwest corner of Milliken Avenue and 7th Street, within The Mixed Use District (Subarea 18 Specific Plan), was approved by the City Planner on April 12, 2005. This project is for the development of a center totaling 23,000 square feet on 1.7 acres of land. The Developer, Fairway Business Center, LLC and Milliken and Greystone Properties, LLC, is submitting an agreement and securities to guarantee the construction of the public improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond Labor and Material Bond $ 14,800.00 $ 7,400.00 Copies of the agreement and securities are available in the City Clerk's Office. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms signed by the Developer are on file in the City Clerk's Office. ReSPectfully submitted, . \ l I ", --+t{(LJ(", Willia~ J. O'Neii City Engineer WJOWV:pjb Attachments 72 ~~ "" 6TH !!l ~ "" ~ ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION ARROW ROUTE: ~' d S1REET ~ RANCHO ~ CUCAMONGA Sill sma:r 4TH sma:r , ONTARIO ). ~~ I!! i ~ "' m ~ iC .,.. .&.. N ITEM: ~C~...(Jt)7rl TITLE: VICINITY ~ 73 RESOLUTION NO. () 0 ~I/ if A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR DRC2004-00721 WHEREAS, the City Council ofthe City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on April 19,2006, by Fairway Business Centre, LLC and Milliken and Greystone Properties, LLC, as Developer, for the improvement ofthe public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located at the northwest comer of Milliken Avenue and 7th Street; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Securities, which are identified in said Improvement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: I. That said Improvement Agreement, be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and 2. That said Improvement Securities are accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney. 7Lj RESOLUTION NO. lJ0 ~ 1/.5 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 FOR DRC2004-0072 I WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code ofthe State of California (the "72 Act"), said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. I and Street Lighting Maintenance District No.6 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 ofthe 72 Act authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owner of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding the such provisions of the 72 Act related to the annexation of . territory to the Maintenance District, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the maintenance Districts on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and WHEREAS. the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 72 Act to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and 75 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 72 Act and/or Article XIIID applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation ofthe Territory to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amount snot to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The above recitals are all true and correct SECTION 2: This City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determine in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the hnprovements. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the hnprovements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. 2 7fo Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property To Be Annexed The Owners of the Property are: Fairway Business Centre, LLC and Milliken and Greystone Properties, LLC The legal description of the Property is: PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 16090, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP FILED IN BOOK 210 PAGES 75 TO 77 INCLUSIVE, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. The above described parcels are shown on sheet A-2 attached herewith and by this reference made a part hereof. A-I DRC2004-00721 77 aEXH1"IT t)',4-'" ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 38 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 '. I- W W a::: l- V) I l- I'- ANAHEIM- PL CE C> z F en X LLJ .... 9 c:i .. .. - J J J__ J J.J! ! = MILLIKEN AVENUE S'TfiR'T ~S ? fA. filS'''' . SlIiel {16H7S $ t)\. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA e> NORTIII<6 ~MHc>B)}'{fl Exhibit B To Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2005/2006 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL): Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (LMD #3B) represents landscape sites throughout the Commercial/Industrial Maintenance District. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The various landscape sites that are maintained by this district consist of median islands, parkways, street trees, entry monuments, the landscaping within the Metrolink Station and 22.87 acres associated with the Adult Sports Park (not including the stadium, parking lots or the maintenance building). STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): Street Light Maintenance District No.1 (SLD #1) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.6 (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL): Street Light Maintenance District No.6 (SLD #6) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on commercial and industrial streets throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally, this area encompasses the industrial area of the City south of Foothill Boulevard. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on industrial or commercial streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on industrial or commercial streets generally south of Foothill Boulevard. B-1 DRC2004-00721 79 Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2005/2006) For Project: DRC2004-00721 Number of Lamps Street Lights 5800L 9500L 16,OOOL 22,OOOL 27,500L SLD# I l~ SLD # 6 2'" Community Trail Turf Non-Turf Trees Landscaping DO SF SF SF EA LMD # 3B 'Existing items installed with original project Assessment Units by District Parcel Acres 1 1.72 S 1 3.44 S6 1.72 L3B 1.72 B-2 DRC2004-00721 3D Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2005/2006 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 38 (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $352.80 for the fiscal year 2005/06. summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance (Commercial/Industrial) : The following table District No. 3B # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue CommlInd Acre 2186.85 1.0 2186.85 $352.80 $771,520.68 The Proposed Armual Assessment against the Property (DRC2004-0072I ) is: 1.72 Acres x 1 AU. Factor x $352.80 Rate Per A.U. = $606.82 Armual Assessment STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): The rate per assessment unit (AU.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2005/06. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No.1 (Arterial Streets): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Parcel 21,151 1.00 21,151 $17.77 $375,853.27 Family Multi- Unit 8,540 1.00 8,540 $17.77 $151,755.80 Family Commercial Acre 2,380.36 2.00 4,760.72 $17.77 $84,597.99 TOTAL $612,207.06 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (DRC2004-0072I ) is: 1.72 Acres x 2 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per AU. = $30.56 Armual Assessment C-l DRC2004-00721 ~I STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.6 (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL): The rate per assessment unit (AU.) is $51.40 for the Fiscal Year 2005/06. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No.6 (Commercial/Industrial): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue CommlInd Acre 2,065.67 1.00 2,090.72 $51.40 $107,463.01 The Proposed Armual Assessment against the Property (DRC2004-0072I) is: 1.72 Acres x I AU. Factor x $51.40 Rate Per AU. = $88.41 Armual Assessment C-2 DRC2004-0072\ CZ2 STAFF REpORT ~,. I . ~~ . , " ';,_:?.......'_....-.~.......... :..'~!Y.(."..-..." '~. >,~; r . , .'" ;-.- --< ~.: ~(-, .: : R<\.NCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERlNG DEP.~RTMENT Date: April 19, 2006 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer By: Mark Brawthen, Contract Engineer Subject: APPROVAL OF MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR PARCEL MAP 16445, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF SIXTH STREET, APPROXIMATELY 1,000 FEET EAST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY CHANG REVOCABLE TRUST RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Parcel Map 16445, accepting the subject agreement and security, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Tentative Parcel Map 16445, located on the north side of Sixth Street, approximately 1,000 feet east of Archibald Avenue in the General Industrial District (Subarea 5) Development District, was approved by the Planning Commission on May 25, 2005 for the division of 7.27 acres into 10 parcels. The Developer, Chang Revocable Trust, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $112,500.00 Labor and Material Bond: $112,500.00 Parcel Map 16445 is a subdivision of Parcel 2, Parcel Map 15948. This property was previously annexed into Landscape and Street Lighting Maintenance Districts with this map. Copies of the agreement and securities are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully submitted, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ENGINEERING DIVISION ()rt?uc{) William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:MB:pjb Attachments ~3 VICiNITY MAP NOT TO SCALE u' > 4: . E .. r I I I .... Q ii ~ f" .51 ;;; :So III ,_ ! 'i:"'+---~'''lm,," i~,aJr'I $t la'/.1)H, 20th 51 F ~ron Blvd .. ,'0 Ji;f;:- '~:^"'1__ "AJ oli1 T'r/',n - Pa~ ~~;- ."i1~_'iA. jJ , HlIm\3~.~!~Y~' .!'~' '-t.. .' -j - I ..-';:;:- , - 24th SI ". " 3 .~ ,)> ,< !tt r- t-~ .,re Q, ....".oil % 'a ~ It ~ F ~_,i>. )> ," I ~ ~ ,,. I < ! 4., I~~ _,~ ..-: __', ,...L?1/1.SI. _ -~ - I -~ ~,t:cf~lssSt ~l '1' j, ;, j is. -,~ II ';;~~~o;s~'~i ~MI'ltltS .' \~ I t 1:> ... ,... --. -~-1~ I ~r ) \~J 11.t:adow~t--l D~~~rO{)~~~t+~l " _if 1 " '1'- - . 1 I'! I z ,E,6!h ~I '1.( j , ~ ;':' ~ _.L 6111 $I .. I l:,. I g" .&' 0:,.. I, . ' I is- tOl ~'-' , IN-. 0 I .~ ~i ~I \'i ! r~" ~ ~ &> oh.r Way :'!la'~! ,- I !g 1-, ~ ,g ,=.!1, I H~!,ln..~r -r1 -f j~L i:i . i 10 10 :0 I.... 'I c j- - C l .2' ~l i~ f ~;--; "-"] i~-1I:1J~ 12 , t_f.~~~e:nL. ~~et Or - -. I'll 1<_. ~- ' .~ to itr ",g ,)> -J ~ Z ~ \ t iO '0 l'- '0 f'" ::r ,:!! / '~r~o!<L,~I". . ,- s- .' L ,.~ I.~ !--^""', ~~~~.O, I, '.. ;;;I , ,- ! _ 1_ ,~. ;S~.~~rO;'.iQt! .~ !~ GI~:~r~,:~IL$P!~gb~:~ .CI)~,," 4th St . "Ilf' {J~i;''; I' ,". iii' ~:}t., .;1 '8lI1.'$I.:. 'J I.. n w' II !l Ii ,I It- n I~ H~ I~ I'" ~.. fl %n I, ~-':.~;-~'~. -. !i '!i" II.. i> ,Iii ,< .~:: ,t) !j~ conco:\~l~ St 'W;~ _ i ._~4lh.SL,. , ,:I: on '3 [0 !: !)> I~ o 13 f[ m I~ ... .5 j<1 .. H_~Q , Sh~roo Cir i l--- . 5U,Sl ~m. ..... 10 i~ i;U I- Ii! '" I" . 0. '20 .....".~'i-..".."'-':>'t::'W~...::;::::,:':::::::." l,il3 '':;4f',! \,.,q)lo I~ I T~~~_e.'!'_~'t~t , ' --'--"--. I I EIj!e'PrIs.. $1 City of Rancho Cucamonga ENGINEERING DIVISION Item: Parcel Map 16445 Title: VICINITY MAP EXHIBIT: 1 ~~ RESOLUTION NO. 00 -1/6 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 16445, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map No. 16445, submitted by Chang Revocable Trust, and consisting of ten (10) parcels, located on the north side of Sixth Street, approximately 1,000 feet east of Archibald Avenue, being a division of Parcel 2, Parcel Map 15948, was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on May 25, 2005, and is in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and Local Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that Act; and WHEREAS, Parcel Map No. 16445 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met by entry into an Improvement Agreement guaranteed by acceptable Improvement Security by Chang Revocable Trust as developer; and WHEREAS, said Developer submits for approval said Parcel Map offering for dedication, for street, highway and related purposes, the streets delineated thereon and the easements dedicated thereon for storm drain, sidewalk. street tree and landscape purposes. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest; and that the offers for dedication, easements and the final map delineating the same for said Parcel Map No. 16445 is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. <Z55 STAFF REpORT J~\, '-':~,' .l~y" ~f,.(,'>C'.',,;' r. ",' ;-- -<', - , '. / .. RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Date: April 19, 2006 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer By: Joe Stofa, Associate Engineer Subject: APPROVAL OF MAP FOR TRACT NO. 14759-3 LOCATED AT WARDMAN BULLOCK ROAD AND WILSON AVENUE SUBMITTED BY PUL TE HOMES - APN: 226-102-17 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Tract No. 14759-3 and authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said resolution BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tentative Tract 14759, located at Wardman Bullock Road and Wilson Avenue was approved by the City Planning Commission on November 10, 1999 with the approval of Resolution No. 99-11 for the development of 358 single-family homes and 3 lettered lots for common open space/parks totaling 18.3 acres on 132 acres of land. Pulte Homes, Developer, is submitting the third phase for approval that includes 94 single-family homes. The realignment of Banyan Street and the construction of the Flood Control Channel have been completed as a requirement for the final approval of Tract 14759-3. The Developer, Pulte Homes previously submitted an agreement and security on February 15, 2006 to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements. Respectfully submitted, Qv(tLGcL ) William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:JS:pjb Attachments 75& . , ,I ! ! I , VQCO~OTY MA~ '( 1 j J V~ _.... r-l " rt, V \ u ~ __" J ~ _"'V .;> /... . SpNllI:. ell ~.....I sfl,';;I';;'i,;,,;;;;;,jl;;,I;;~ljjl!lll;;;jJI;iIJ;lll!;'.~lll'Il'llljli;lj~li!lj;jijliljj'llll'~I!!II~1 ;l 'E!:2@g2E'1E~':'~'"'"'"'II\f~!fjllllt;I~!tti 111~lflitl[llr ll~ , H..... = b!i::\i!i:i!::::!::!!:iI!!!!:~:' t'illtEl'ZI ~.:::. \-j ':: ';;1&'1,1 - fp ~ .-: ..',." i i / --- ~ · "" I .. ~ - 'l;, ! I I 1,_ 10-. , J ~ ---i~~Sv 8J""SC: T ,. 0 ~ L J pru"J'et;T I 1 "T.. S.F. .. ... , ". . Ill> -, ~ ~ ~~ 1- ~ ~~ I ~ 1 . .. l ,.._J ... I i I I fir CITY HALL @ env OIF L<:lJAOOCMO CUJeA~OOOGA rft U~ 15 r~3 ~7 , RESOLUTION NO. tJ& - //1 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 14759-3 WHEREAS, Tract 14759-3 submitted by Pulte Homes consisting of94 single family lots located at Ward man Bullock Road and Wilson Avenue was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the development of 358 single family lots on November 10, 1999 and is in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and Local Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that Act; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met by the entry into an Improvement Agreement on February 15, 2005 with Pulte Homes, as developer; and WHEREAS, said Developer submits for approval said Tract Map 14759-3 offering for dedication, for street, highway and related purposes, the streets delineated thereon and the easements dedicated thereon for storm drain, sidewalk, street tree and landscape purposes. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES, that with said Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security previously submitted by said developer and approved and signed by the Mayor, then said Tract Map 14759-3 is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. 15~ -'~ ~ ' ('(1.1', ~iv. ,", '~..- 'i\.(-;.A[.' )--- --(..' '~./ .~ f .t' RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REpORT ENG[NEERlNG DEPARTMENT To: Date: April 19, 2006 From: By: Subject: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Bety Miller, Associate Engineer APPROVAL OF MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7 FOR TRACT 16226-1, LOCATED NORTH OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD AND WEST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE SUBMITTED BY K. HOVNANIAN FORECAST HOMES, INC. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Tract 16226- 1, accepting the subject agreement and security, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 7, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tentative Tract 16226, located north of Wilson Avenue, east of Day Creek Boulevard and west of Etiwanda Avenue in the Low Residential Development District, was approved by the Planning Commission on July 24,2002 for the division of 92.78 acres into 265 lots. This is the first of three final maps. The Developer, K. Hovnanian Forecast Homes, Inc., is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: Labor and Material Bond: Monumentation: $ 1,305,700.00 $ 1,305,700.00 $ 7,400.00 A letter of approval has been received from Cucamonga Valley Water District. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms signed by the Developer are on file in the City Clerk's Office. ~9 Cny COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TRACT 16226-1 - K. HOVNANI,\N FORECAST HOMES, INC. APRIl. 19, 2006 PAGE2 Copies of the agreement and securities are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully submitted, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ENGINEERING DIVISION (if? ClUfv~ wL J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:BM:pjb Attachments 9D A==-""'":..":.:. I "~.IJIT 1...Al1Nf> ProPERTY __~ ______ ,......""""""""""_11(' ..-....-:rIT,-_1 -- m... LU~'.___" -'-'"'!_=,\ ....Go:>WW.- \ (~; . ~:::'/~ ,,~:~~~~,~~- ~i~;:;:I~I:::':~::'::;~~::;;~~-:-"::::::::~~::=;:~=-:::::~ \ ~AP" Em 1:....... .. .. .. " .. " :II ". ~..""...... .. .. .. .... It ..::.r. ~~ -\.------ill---. 'T' ;1 , - ;,.:. ''1"':' 'J':-S:'" H.......h'~L~4.:." .1'):l\~F"':' ~,!~.~+I.j+I+~H." II' k ' ::'::dJ::~~:. V:lj~. "~~'/"~:':~'~'>'(~,;:'~.~"~':",.:~.~:~:~./:). ~ " .. "", :':.-....... At! II //:;,.. '}.../".-" . -, . "/~ ) , " '-,';_ "," .. c, 8 I,,,,, "L' ,,,' .. <' I)'. '. '. ". ~.' W-" . ,,' ~'ii. :or -IoU J I." '~,..~.>/ ~ ool'" ~r../ ".... ~->;'/~':A? ~.. ~"" .. .," S '..,. " .;-~'" .... . '>c,. yu ..,.." '. .~/ ,/", +. ~'a .. U" "nq-, (,,0 ..' "" n/../.':- ,'.. . (-" "' \1,,' . ~ '''. , ,,", .~'~ ,,' !!:' c.:t"/:f" , " ',,('1.., ." ,,;-;C', -b:;! \~\ t: .. -.' <IT ~..:""" ~~ "'", .'~".:~1. .~. "v.~~f"" " r:. ,. .; ~ . . ." , '" .. ,i,-? ,"';'~, .., , ,--< " }"}'> , .,,, '" . ' .. ':it .... '/P' l!li-," , I')' ~... '. . ~" II ~ .. " .\ .. I ......."'" ,. '-'" ,..,,,;...)\;j, ..,W"H...." ..... ., 11 ,~,..,f 'X~r....'..~ ","if'.......(i9..~~ .;;"J:tl~ "\_\",, .... Ii) : :...~~~'- '" :.~,:,._ ,. .;:_..j;.~,:3~ttr,'~~,~,.l'l . ...' ~ ,~~\, .. r "'~\'L~ 1"~1' , \ j;'c::: '''::0-iP-q-.!:lIlI ! i ~"'lpt 'f). , "'",...."...." f'i'b:~ ,,' -~...- w~~l/ , ....... ZI.IIJJ I--Ll ~.l. :', : .' a." f-f--- '-I' I ~ .~ c; . ....... 1141 ." f..-I-----j i' 1"/ ~\.~:-~/~IIIm~J:~ ~r' 1-1- ,\ ~~' ."'\' <..,J.6<\iW i , I- ,." '''^'' --l c-..Y;.~J ' I- - .. "'/--lHf\: I ~_ ,.' .,,"::)t.-,w I ~gm~:"...:",,"" \'1"'11 ~1.t:f-~~0) --b/. ~'" " 111'111 Wf1~~ ..S-L.J1 ',~,' -.II 'IIIIIJ.~ r 1t--f3l3:j= ~ /]I ~, / I '11' I III1II1II TIT III I " t'...L---H1j I Tl Ll / H r--H E:: j ttJ tB 1:: '11111 m III IIIIIIITT II IILlIIJlII'I" II 1/= 1= 111/11111 it t /11/1 N "-LIIIIIIIII u '/ 11111111 ,,",UIIIJIIIIVJ..: -Xl- r /111111111 I " '}:';:'ili::i ,", ~ ~ ~'s ,III >,"~:--i I II IIIII:~-~ L ~'ijl~Jljr=t ~HC8 '1[11111111 . '".If,,' , ,~H~ER+iL-~ -H~ ; mr~m~J=Mll JlIIIII/If! In I II 1111111111 "'1 JlIIIIII..L :"II III IJJW II /j - ~)'X\\ ///''>.. '\ I - " '(::Y ~ ---'-."./- .r: t: rl}-_ III Jlllr- ,r:-\~-I- .lLJr 111'lffY)':SUIl- /T /1/11/1111 I m I rlTr ~ I ~ 8 ~ r- /--L Ef ~ ,- / 0 " '" ~ o w otic:: o ~ .. - ..;2: ~ ]'E ^ ~.- .~ u ^ ~> ^ -5 ~ :I: f;j S ~ ~~ ~ ~ Ul t: E-< -< o Z Oz ::EQ ~~ Uc; ;:::JCl UO ~ O~ O:r:~ >- u ~ f-;ZO ,..... ~z 9j ~~ RESOLUTION NO. () (p - / ( Z A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 16226-1, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map 16226, submitted by BCA Development and consisting of 265 lots located north of Wilson A venue, east of Day Creek Boulevard and west of Etiwanda Avenue, was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on July 24, 2002, and is in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and Local Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that Act; and WHEREAS, Tract Map No. 16226-1 is the first of three final maps of the division ofland approved as shown on said Tentative Tract Map; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met by entry into an Improvement Agreement guaranteed by acceptable Improvement Security by K. Hovnanian Forecast Homes, Inc., as developer; and WHEREAS, said Developer submits for approval said Tract Map offering for dedication, for street, highway and related purposes, the streets delineated thereon and the easements dedicated thereon for storm drain, sidewalk, street tree and landscape purposes. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest; and that the offers for dedication, easements and the final map delineating the same for said Tract Map No. 16226-1 is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. 92 RESOLUTION NO. () to -//9 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7 FOR TRACT 16226-1 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972," being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of Califomia (the "72 Act"), said Landscape Maintenance District No.7, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. I and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the 72 Act authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding such provisions of the 72 Act related to the annexation of territory to the Maintenance District, Article xmD of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the maintenance Districts on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the "Tenitory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent and Waiver to Annexation of Certain Real Property to a Maintenance District and Approval of the Levy of Assessments on Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 72 Act to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly conscnted to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and 93 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 72 Act and/or Article XmD applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual assessmcnt set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual asscssments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: The above recitals are all true and correct SECTION 2: This City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the hnprovements. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the armexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the hnprovements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. 2 TR 16226-1 qLj Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property to be Annexed The Owners of the Property are: K. Hovnanian Forecast Homes, Inc. The legal description of the Property is: Real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as follows: PARCEL I OF PARCEL MAP NO. 15699, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 210 OF PARCEL MAPS, PAGES 53 THROUGH 56, INCLUSIVE, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. APN: 0225-071-37 and 0225-071-48 and 0225-071-50 The above-described parcels are shown on sheet A-2 attached herewith and by this reference made a part hereof. A-I TR 16226-1 95 --Fl- Ii, w ~ -1- , ~""""~, ~"" = , : ~, , "\.\~ TI;J '.~ : :.zrY' 1., \ ~" ~ 0 I- : r" ',v'"'~ /L~~~ ~ 'I " + : r -~--I,'litt"" - ~~f'-, ~";'I". , , ,; . , ,:s 'I - '0. - , r<,: I. : 'I I r:::I ---;;'-~;,. 1" I, ',',. . s- f l/ 1:- :- '-q'/~1!A "'i<-;; " "\' ~ [\ ~~ ' :, ; ,; ,r'.,c;;, r.-r" .~'~ ,," : I 15 I" '" ~[=- --<-"-'J. ~'. ";g" : .r-~--;-:, -_~~'N t~~ 'I' , :: '; L",i' ' , 0<."" ' /'. '"~', 'J : : I [2 rtt" %'~'f: ' 'J--^It(~,.!;!.... ~~--:::____-. ~11 h I ' , I "- . /",~'. "~~' :--...\ '~' ". ': "- " -'5', . ;"(fIZ. 0 ~ ,\\'''/.....~ :::j ',' ' 3: \ ,1 '2 T ... \' c-- .,.... ... '\> " : : I 9 '. \" " ,.; / . __ = .,,-' " _" ?f --""'- ' 1/ " 't': J '\"" - . 'P~ <S'"' L' ". K II:: ~:.<<.,~;v-~..J:'.~)"~~I"'.'~' I!~ i,: ~ / .J~.,,~I.\~<~~/~~. ,j~"-~t}; ~ -~~ I ~ . " .\. '0 . ,,-^~,~ . __.. '''t...~ l~\~ _~~, ~ .1':' I '),,/C,', ", "'._ , " ~~~! i i I ~ , "\ <;~ ",' ~~ . . ~ ~- I ~~E - ~~"~'11~ -- , I ,-----. '-'" '~((OJ _ . . ~j I , . . , ~ _ '-. , . ", _ >. _ . \ _ ~,- , , \ - - "f--- -- , '" ~:i , . ' " . (';-"'1., , _ ',. ,.,__ ,_~ ' , ." ~ 71 . 0 =' '~~,.. '-' t . I.. oJ-' _"'-"" . " i ~l ~~~ "'A:<~--H.~~" -*~~~'~~il~ '~~ '\ ,e, - ",><~ '1'--"4(, ~ "", " :: 71 ~ '..... 2/'<;. .~" _, r,oJ' :: = g : ::. ~ f · "v.;oTh;. '. '~. f";"" "'1- ~ > ~' '" '..d · -(. J::n "'.. ~!''k' "\ ~ ~: Yilt;. i,\~ " ~ ~'h.~o~-" _ y~ -it " . . ',: .rt III " ;.. ~ t , ,";" 1.- " ,V"'", _ ,,;;,' ~~, ". ,~" ~~\\ '- ~ " . · -- '- -f 0 "'" ~ \" \. \" ~ :: , · : -" ",/'0 "', '" · 'Y,"'IIS . , 1,: p.= : :'"1 "'. ~./,: '-~ " ", ':~'{:l~ \ ~ i i +0: ~ 'It · :.:~. -'-. "~~~"~" ~',):l.-- ,cr~. B : ' ,. · ".' · ' " '""" , , ,"'" .. '-. - /i ' \ -", . "... .' " ~" "" " .......d~' i : ~ ~ ~:..-" K%' · ' , ,'. ", 4/~G ..-_ .........".__ t : Ii-] ,: -:,,~: ~. -"Zcr'_ -' /..?- "'::'\~ "'t T" 1, " ..-' ""'. '/):1"'., ~J i .u--::. ~ "-~l-- ,2lf-? s A'':' _ - VI :.. '. -. . ',--. - -< ' , r.-, '."" · "'"", ,\ . - ." 0 : : r.- ". ...."'. " ". " . 9 Z . , '. · · ' .. . X " ,..,.., l! : Ie . . '-', ',,, d1~,~ 1 . " . /I ~. -. , , , 0 Z .,. ." Ci " , c. ~ ce'; ~ ,;...., _ _, 0 D n '<::'< Q .~:;;" --:;- """,-\~ ,- ~'I,'<. .' - I ~:i'~ ~r-. '1' " i " ~: P ''\!!C.": '-tl ,I~' ie : , ,'" "" " -<" l'llii c: ': c,_ .':~tt ; ~.,., }; 17- %; u ~ ~lli i i ~:Y,~, ':': .',: ~ ~i':''':J['~,"'I · w: ~E 8 ~ ~I' " o=_m. -... 0. 0 ~ "I : : ,-",-- ---' . 0 O~ '- : .;, fA. 0 , ._, " 7'-;;'" .- .../ :>- Z ~ '~~ilg# ';~';~~'"') :r t w " ~ ------- ~ I~I,;";-, ~ , I \ '" " r-- '" N _ o N en o 'D ~ \0 ...... c'd ~ II . -0 I - -;' g-< ~ r-- i:: .. ~ .~ ~ -z-;:s ~e:l '" 0 ~ t) {J >< t:: g ~ f- ~ :;:; ~ ~ ~ ...... f:: ~ 22 o z \ ~ ~ -2 " F <:c x 11) 2 -z <t: ~ ~ o '" n. on '" ~ "- ~ ~ ~ > ;iii'7 --- , Exhibit B Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2005/2006 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.7 (NORTH ETIWANDA) Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (LMD #7) represents landscape sites throughout the Etiwanda North Area. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The various sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, paseos, street trees, community trails and Etiwanda Creek Park. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 (ARTERIAL STREETS) Street Light Maintenance District No. I (SLD #1)) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.7 (NORTH ETIW ANDA) Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (SLD #7) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets in what is termed the North Etiwanda area of the City. Generally, this area encompasses the area of the City east of Day Creek Channel and north of Highland Avenue within the incorporated area of the City. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the North Etiwanda area. B-1 TR 16226-1 97 Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2005/2006) For Project: TR 16226-1 No additions beyond Rancho Etiwanda Estates Infrastructure Assessment Units by District Parcel DUI Acres 97 DU S 1 97 S 7 97 L7 97 B-1 TR 16226-1 9 ~ Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2005/2006 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.7 (NORTH ETIWANDA) The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $307.05 for the fiscal year 2005/06. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District NO.7 (North Etiwanda): # of Physical Assessment #of Rate Per Units U nits Factor Assessment Assessment Land Use Type Units Unit Revenue Single Parcel 1572 1.00 1572 $307.05 $482,682.60 Family CommlInd. Acre 5 2.00 10 $307.05 $3,070.50 TOTAL $485,753.10 The Proposed Armual Assessment against the Property (TR 16226-1) is: 97 Parcels x 1 A.V. Factor x $307.05 Rate Per AU. = $29,783.85 Annual Assessment STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 (ARTERIAL STREETS) The rate per assessment unit (AU.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2005/06. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No.1 (Arterial Streets): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Parcel 21,151 1.00 21,151 $17.77 $375,853.27 Family Multi- Unit 8,540 1.00 8,540 $17.77 $151,755.80 Family Commercial Acre 2,380.36 2.00 4,760.72 $17.77 $84,597.99 TOTAL $612,207.06 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (Tract 16226-1) is: 97 Parcels x 1 AU. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. ~ $1,723.69 Annual Assessment C-I TR 16226-1 99 STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.7 (NORTH ETIWANDA) The rate per assessment unit (AU.) is $33.32 for the fiscal year 2005/06. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District NO.7 (North Etiwanda): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Parcel 1804 1.00 1804 $33.32 $60,109.28 Family CommlInd Acre 5 2,00 10 $33.32 $333.20 TOTAL $60,442.48 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 16226-1) is: 97 Parcels x I AU. Factor x $33.32 Rate Per A.U. = $3,232.04 Armllal Assessment C-2 TR 16226-1 /OD ENGINEERlNG DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM Date: April 19, 2006 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer By: Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer Subject: APPROVAL OF MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES, MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 AND STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR TRACT 16320, LOCATED AT THE SOUTH SIDE OF VISTA GROVE, NORTH OF WOODRIDGE DRIVE, EAST OF HERMOSA AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY TEAM 7 PROPERTIES, INC. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Tract Map 16320, accepting the subject agreement, securities, monumentation cash deposit and ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District NO.1 and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 for Tract 16320 and authorizing the Mayor to sign said agreement and the City Clerk to cause said map to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tentative Tract Map 16320, located at the south side of Vista Grove, north of Woodridge Drive, east of Henmosa Avenue, in the Very Low Residential District (1-2 dwelling units per acre), was approved by the Planning Commission on October 22, 2003. This project is for a subdivision of 4.9 acres of land into 7 lots. The Developer, Team 7 Properties, Inc., is submitting an agreement, securities and monumentation cash deposit to guarantee the construction of the public street improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond Labor and Material Bond Monumentation Cash Deposit $ 197,800.00 $ 98,900.00 $ 2,750.00 Copies of the agreement and securities are available in the City Clerk's Office. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms signed by the Developer are on file in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully submitted, ~rf-(( L.c cL Willi~ J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:WV:pjb Attachments JD/ I4STA SITE BANYAN STREET . TO LOS ANGELES TO SAN 210 'E:RNARDINO . HIGHLAND Aiif': ~ ~ ~ '" CITY OF '" '" RANCHO ~ CUCAAlONGA '" 10 BASELINE RD. ~ ifl ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ..., ~ ~ ~ ~ :t: ~ l..J ~ . ~ FOURTH Sf. ~ ~ CITY OF \fj ONTARIO ~ . TO LOS ANGELES TO SANQ: BERNARDINO . 10 ~ > J CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A N ITEM: 1j?4CT 16~gLJ TITLE:J//CIN/7Y ~ ENGINEERING DIVISION /02 RESOLUTION NO. 6 (0 - I 2 6 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP 16320, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND MONUMENT A TION CASH DEPOSIT WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map 16320, submitted by Team 7 Properties, Inc. and consisting ofa subdivision of 4.9 acres ofland into 7 lots, located at the south side of Vista Grove, north of Woodridge Drive, east ofHennosa Avenue, in the Very Low Residential District (1-2 dwelling units per acre), was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on October 22,2003; and WHEREAS, Tract Map 16320 is the final map ofthe division ofland approved as shown on the Tentative Tract Map; and WHEREAS, aU the requirements established as prerequisite to approval ofthe installation of public street and storm drain improvements by the City Council of said City have now been met by posting the Improvement Securities and Monumentation Cash Deposit by Team 7 Properties, Inc., as developer; and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and Monumentation Cash Deposit submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and that said Tract Map 16320 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. / oS RESOLUTION NO. () t - /2/ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I AND STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 2 FOR TRACT MAP 16320 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972," being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "72 Act"), said Landscape Maintenance District No. I, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. I and Street Lighting Maintenance District No.2 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 ofthe 72 Act authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all ofthe owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding such provisions of the 72 Act related to the annexation of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the maintenance Districts on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners ofthe Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent and Waiver to Armexation of Certain Real Property to a Maintenance District and Approval of the Levy of Assessments on Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all ofthe owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 72 Act to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and / ()tj WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 72 Act and/or Article XIIID applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation ofthe Territory to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: The above recitals are all true and correct SECTION 2: This City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost ofthe proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvements. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Terri tory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. !()5 Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property to be Annexed The Owners of the Property are: Team 7 Properties, Inc. The legal description of the Property is: IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF THE NORTH 330 FEET OF LOT ,3, MAP OF SHOWALTER SUBDIVISION, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 19 OF MAPS, PAGE 75, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. The above-described parcels are shown on sheet A-2 attached herewith and by this reference made a part hereof. A-I TR 16320 / DIo &H/817 ~..~M ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 2 ---- .J01.Il2" ~ ~ - - ] ...- ,~~ ',-- -1> " - -...- !~ -~ . - , , . I =---=-- I ~ - - . - - .1 00 _ - - - .. 1 ~ .0---_ U__ J/ife17 /./ Gllrs S'1ft~r lIf<<?ES -fM. fa ~. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STAl'F. OFrAI.IFORNTA A NORT1l11 YJfN:'Y I~~IO Exhibit B Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2005/2006 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I (GENERAL CITY) Landscape Maintenance District No. I (LMD #1) represents 23.63 acres of landscape area, 41.88 acres of parks and 16.66 acres of community trails which are located at various sites throughout the City. These sites are not considered to be associated with anyone particular area within the City, but rather benefit the entire City on a broader scale. As such, the parcels within this district do not represent a distinct district area as do the City's remaining LMD's. Typically parcels within this district have been annexed upon development The various sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, paseos, street trees, entry monuments, community trails and parks. The 41.88 acres of parks consist of Bear Gulch Park, East and West Beryl Park, Old Town Park, Church Street Park, Golden Oaks Park and the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I (ARTERIAL STREETS) Street Light Maintenance District No. I (SLD #1)) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.2 (LOCAL STREETS) Street Light Maintenance District No.2 (SLD #2) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally, this area encompasses the residential area of the City west of Haven A venue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit this area of the City. This sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets generally west of Haven Avenue. B-1 TR 16320 /lf6 Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2005/2006) For Project: TR 16320 Number of Lamps Street Lights 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,OOOL 27,500L SLD# 1 SLD # 2 4 Community Trail Turf Non-Turf Trees Landscaping DGSF SF SF EA LMD#1 43 *Existing items installed with original project Assessment Units by District D.U. Parcel 7 7 S 1 7 S2 7 Ll 7 B-l TR 16320 / D9 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2005/2006 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 (GENERAL CITY) The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $92.21 for the fiscal year 2005/06. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No.1 (General City): # of Rate Per # of Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Parcel 7573 1.0 7269 $92.21 $670,274.49 Family Multi- Units 5952 0.5 2976 $92.21 $274,416.96 Family Commllnd. Acre 2 1.0 2 $92.21 $184.42 TOTAL $972,907.71 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TRACT 16320) is: 7 Parcels x 1 A.U. Factor x $92,21 Rate Per AU. = $645.47 Assessment STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 (ARTERIAL STREETS) The rate per assessment unit (AU.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2005/06. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No.1 (Arterial Streets): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Parcel 18,894.00 1.00 18,894.00 $17.77 $335,746.38 Family Multi- Unit 6,563..00 1.00 6,563.00 $17.77 $116,624.51 Family Commercial Acre 2,245.47 2.00 4,490.94 $17.77 $ 79,804,00 TOTAL $532,174.89 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 16320) is: 7 Parcels x 1 AU. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per AU. = $124.39 Annual Assessment C-l TR 16320 / / () STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.2 (LOCAL STREETS) The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $39.97 for the fiscal year 2005/06. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No.2 (Local Streets): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Parcel 6050 1.00 6050 $39.97 $241,818.50 Family Multi Family Unit 24 1.00 919 $39.97 $36,732.43 Commercial Acre 19.05 2.00 19.05 $39.97 $1,522.86 Total $280,073.79 The Proposed Armual Assessment against the Property (TR 16320) is: 7 Parcels x 1 A.U. Factor x $39.97 Rate Per AU. = $279.79 Armual Assessment C-2 TR 16320 / / / STAFF REpORT ~~ '\~.?;,,'''',,\~;~~'L!1'(~,''.,,'.' " ~." ;".\ ;..-- -<", de. . _ ~ __.j ,,... ./, , ..,' / .:-~~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERlNG DEPARTMENT Date: April 19, 2006 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer By: Joe Stofa, Jr., Associate Engineer Subject: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT LONG MEADOW DRIVE AND VICTORIA PARK LANE FOR TRACT NO. 16372 LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF CHURCH STREET AND ETIWANDA AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY VICTORIA ARBORS, LLC RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject agreement and security and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tract No. 16372 (Phased Tract of Tentative Tract No. 15974) located on the northwest corner of Church Street and Etiwanda Avenue was approved by the Planning Commission on March 7, 2001 for the development of 555 single family lots. Tract No. 16372 allows for the construction of 120 single family residences. The Developers, Standard Pacific Corporation have constructed the 95 single family residences and prior to final approval need to construct the traffic signal at the intersection of Long Meadow Drive and Victoria Park Lane. The Developer has submitted an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the traffic signal in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond Labor and Material Bond: $115,000.00 $ 57,500.00 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office Respectfully submitted, qdt~ect William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:JS:pjb Attachments /12 RESOLUTION NO. ()(p- / 2 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT LONG MEADOW DRIVE AND VICTORIA PARK LANE FOR TRACT 16372 WHEREAS, Tract Map 16372 (Phased Tract of Tentative Tract No. 15974) submitted by Victoria Arbors, LLC and consisting of95 single family homes located at the northwest comer of Church Street and Etiwanda Avenue was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on March 7, 2001 and is in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and Local Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that Act; and WHEREAS, Tract Map No.16372 is the final map of a portion of the division of Land approved as shown on said Tentative Tract Map No.15974; and WHEREAS, all ofthe requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met by entry into an Improvement Agreement for the traffic signal at Long Meadow Drive and Victoria Park Lane guaranteed by acceptable Improvement Security by Standard Pacific Corporation, as developers. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest; is hereby approved. /15 RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY SERVICES Staff Report DAlE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: April 19, 2006 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III APPROVAL TO EXECUTE AN ADDENDUM TO THE EPICENTER RENTAL CONTRACT WITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA HIGH SCHOOL FOR WAIVER OF RENTAL FEES ASSOCIATED WITH GRADUATION CEREMONIES AT THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA EPICENTER IN EXCHANGE FOR CITY USE OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HIGH SCHOOL'S GYMNASIUM FOR CITY'S YOUTH BASKETBALL PROGRAM FOR 2007 AND 2008. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends entering into a two-year agreement to provide Rancho Cucamonga High School the Epicenter Stadium for their high school graduations in the years 2007 and 2008. In exchange, the City will receive the usage of the Rancho Cucamonga High School's gymnasium for its City Youth Basketball Program in 2007 and 2008. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Rancho Cucamonga High School has requested that the City once again consider an addendum to our Epicenter Rental Contract to allow its 2007 and 2008 graduation classes to conduct their commencement ceremonies at the Epicenter Stadium. A similar agreement has been in place since 1996. In exchange for the stadium's base rental fee of $2,000, the City would continue to be allowed use of the high school's gymnasium for its Youth Basketball Program. The City's basketball program has continually grown over the past several years. The participant levels have exceeded Community Services ability to provide in-door game space, which in the past has resulted in games played outside or indoors on Sundays, which has not been popular with parents. 1/'-/ CllY COUNCIL ApPROVAL TO EXECUTE ADDENDUM TO EPICENTER RENTAL CONTRACT WITH RCHS FOR GRADUATION CEREMONIES ATTHE EPICENTER IN EXCHANGE FOR CllY'S USE OF RCHS GYMNASIUM APRIL 19, 2006 Fiscal Impact: The $2,000 fee exchange applies only to facility rental. It does not include staff, maintenance, operational, or security expenses associated with usage of the Epicenter Stadium. The high school would continue to provide comprehensive public liability insurance in the amount of $2 million dollars. Dates for use of the Epicenter Stadium are coordinated with Valley Baseball prior to approval. In summary, the past has shown that this agreement is mutually beneficial to both the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Rancho Cucamonga High School therefore staff recommends that the City Council approve the attached addendum to the Epicenter Rental Contract. . ed, Kevin c rdle Community Services Director - 2- / I 5 CITY COUNCIL ApPROVAL TO EXECUTE ADDENDUM TO EPICENTER RENTAL CONTRACT WITH RCHS FOR GRADUATION CEREMONIES AT THE EPICENTER IN EXCHANGE FOR CITY'S USE OF RCHS GYMNASIUM APRIL 19, 2006 ADDENDUM TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF PERMIT USE OF THE EPICENTER STADIUM The terms and conditions of permit for facility use of the Epicenter are hereby modified to incorporate the following provisions between the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) and the Rancho Cucamonga High School (RCHS): 1. Rancho Cucamonga High School shall be permitted to rent the Epicenter Stadium for its 2007 and 2008 senior graduation. The City and RCHS will coordinate and develop a graduation event plan to ensure a successful commencement program and to mitigate any problems related to public safety and crowd control and potential damage to the Epicenter Stadium Complex. 2. The rental payment for RCHS's one day use of the Epicenter Stadium in 2005 and 2006 shall be exchanged for the City's use of the RCHS full gymnasium space for seven (7) to ten (10) Saturdays between January and March of 2007 (January 6, 13,2027; February 3, 10, 17,24; and March 3,10) and 2008 (January 5,12,19,26; February 2,9,16,23; and March 1 and 8) from 11 :30 a.m. until 10:00 p.m. The City and RCHS will coordinate a procedure to ensure a successful youth basketball program and to mitigate any problems related to safety, crowd control, vandalism and damage to the RCHS gymnasium. (a) If seven (7) to ten (10) Saturdays cannot be provided by the end of the basketball program the City will have the option of using additional Saturdays through March 2007/2008 to extend its season. The City mayor may not utilize this option. Due to the basketball season time constraints, the City requires the use of seven to ten Saturdays prior to March 10, 2007/March 8, 2008. (b) The exchange applies to rental fees only and does not include other facility use costs such as staffing, maintenance, operations or security expenses. 3. A meeting of the City and RCHS staff will be held no later than the first week of October to review the school's calendar and confirm the City's gymnasium program usage. Any facility conflicts will be resolved between the City and RCHS personnel. 4. The rental date of Epicenter Stadium for the RCHS graduation ceremonies shall be coordinated with Valley Baseball Club, Inc. and the Quakes baseball season home schedule. City of Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga High School Kevin McArdle Community Services Director Joann Cadwallader School Operations Manager Date: Date: - 3- j /!o STAFF REpORT ENGINEERlNG DEP",RTMENT Date: To: From: By: Subject: April 19, 2006 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer ~ Cindy Hackett, Associate Engineer " Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Tec ici I<fII ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED AND AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $607,340.00 TO THE APPARENT LOW BIDDER, GENTRY BROTHERS, INC., AND AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF A 10% CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $60,734.00 FOR THE MILLIKEN AVENUE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM 4TH STREET TO 6TH STREET, TO BE FUNDED FROM AD 82-1 FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO. 16003035650/1467600-0 AND TRANSPORTATION FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO. 11243035650/1467124-0 AND APPROPRIATE AN ADDITIONAL AMOUNT OF $300,000.00 TO ACCOUNT NO. 11243035650/1467124-0 FROM TRANSPORTATION FUND BALANCE RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $607,340.00 to the apparent low bidder, Gentry Brothers, Inc., and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $60,734.00, for the Milliken Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation from 4th Street to 6th Street, to be funded from AD 82-1 funds, Account No. 16003035650/1467600-0 and Transportation funds, Account No. 11243035650/1467124-0 and appropriate an additional amount of $300,000.00 to Account No. 11243035650/1467124-0 from Transportation fund balance. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on April 4, 2006, for the subject project. The Engineer's estimate was $595,394.00. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements with any irregularities to be inconsequential. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds all bidders meet the requirements of the bid documents. The Milliken Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation from 4th Street to 6th Street scope of work consists of cold milling, removal and replacing of existing pavement, asphalt rubber overlay paving, re-striping and pavement markings, re-installing inductive traffic signal loops, and adjusting manholes and valves to new finished grade. The contract documents call for thirty (30) working days to complete this construction, This project is partially being funded by developer deposit ($13,600.00). Res8.!'ctfully submitted, _ u- (t/{~e) Willi~ -?o'Neil City Engineer WJO:CH/RO:ls Attachments /11 ::i " s ~ ~ c ~ ;. ~ ;:; ~ ~ l;; ~ 0" ~ Ill;; 0 ...!-< ~ gj~ Ill... ~!-< ..... fa !- e- O - ~ :z: Z 0 III "u \0 '" '" = .... '" ...;".C '" I-.:!~ C2:=.... .Q .. ~ '" ~ -= ... ~~::; -Z ... ... = '" "' .. '" =- e ... o .. ... :::i ~ ::; - '" ... l'Q=-,OO IX o 1; -= >0; = ... >- .. ..,. ~ ~ ~ :E 5 ~ :E:':!l ~~ - l'Q o ~~ u" :;10 .,,:;: u 0" !:lu ... Ii " ..cI ... ..., Q ~ 0_0 .. ":;: III ., b = .. o ...... -~ zo "u ~. ";; :> o E " ... ~ ;::l o 0) " ..::! " u ~ S ";; OJ)~ S";; "1:l ~ .2 8- u ~ S'6 ~"1:l OJ) " " " ~ bJJ .D " 2'6 o " "1:l 6h z !:: l:r S ~.s: t I::: ~ Ii '5 > u ~'t ro VJ"':::: {) ~ u ~ ... z " ,. ~ Ii:' o z o o 0" o O. <Xl " ~ .. o o o o 0_ <Xl " ~ .. o o 0" o O. <Xl " ~ .. o o 0" o o 0" " .. o o 0" o o 0" $ r/l -.l o o '" ~ '" r-: " ~ .. o o .,; ~ "'. " " ~ .. o o oj " .. o o 0" '" ". ~ <Xl ~ .. o o 0" <Xl .. f ~ >< ~ - o ::r: ... " .D .D ;::l ~ - ";; .D 0- ~ <( r/l Z o f- N r--- N N N o o .,,: ~ "'- M ~ .. o o " ~ "', M ~ .. o o oj '" .. o o " ~ '" M' ~ .. o o oj '" .. 0) ~ 5 o u OJ) S " > " -.l C-J <( r/l Z o f- M M N ,..; o o 0" '" "'. M " ~ .. o o o '" N_ M " ~ .. o o oj '" .. o o 0" o '" oo :! .. o o 0" '" .. " ~ ... ;::l o U 0) ~ " ~ cJ -0:: r/l Z o f- a r--- " N " o o 0" '" <Xl. " " .. o o 0" '" <Xl " " .. o o 0" N .. o o 0" a- "! N ~ ~ .. o o 0" M .. 0) ~ " ~ 0) - " OJ) " 6h OJ) <( "1:l " .D ~ 2 u r/l Z o f- M " r--- M .,.; o 0 o 0 ci 0 o N ~ " .0 '" ~ .. 1---- o 0 o 0 0" 0 o N ~ " .. '" ~ .. o 0 '<:f: C? ~ 0 .. N '" o o 0" '" " oo N .. o '" '" .. ]' - .;;; " g "1:l " " " " " -a "1:l -0 u ~ ;::l " ... " ,. OJ) " '6 -'2 u S ~ OJ) " " " ii: "1:l -0 u >- r/l a a on - - -.0 o o 0" o N. " .. o o o o N '" ~ " :> ";; > ~ " OJ) ..: 0) - " " ~ " "1:l " ... o 2 - ~ ;::l '6' <( <( "-1 '-0 M ,...: o o 0" o "'. ~ .. o o 0" o "', .. o o 0" o " .. o o 0" o "'. ~ .. o o 0" o " .. " "1:l " ... o o - " -0 .D " " ::E - ~ ;::l '6' <( <( "-1 " 00 o o 0" o M .. o o o o M .. -a o 0" o O. N .. o o 0" o M .. o o 0" '" M .. o o o '" M '" ~ a on ~ N ~ 5b CIi - S ;J "1:l " " 0- r/l 3 ~ .s <( "-1 '" o '" 0" o O. N .. o o 0" o 0_ ~ .. -c- o 0" o o. '" .. o o 0" o 0_ ~ .. o o 0" o '" .. ~ " - " Q ... < '6 " " 0- 0- <( u " 0- r/l " " r/l ~ 5b CIi " " u ;::l ):; ~ " o U ";; - ~ " ~ <( "-1 N 6 - o 0 o 0 o ci o " o. " '" ,,' ~ .. .. o o o o 0_ '" ~ .. o o 0" o o. '" '" .. o o o o o ",- '" .. ~ OJ) " :Q ... " ::E " " S " > " "" '0 " " OJ) " 5- 'C: U5 r/l -.l - - o o 0" o o 0" .. o o 0" " ". " .. o o 0" o 0, o ~ .. o o 0" '" .. o o 0" o o. o .. o o o M " 0" ~ .. o o 0" o o '" '" .. o o 0" a- '" .. o o 0" o o ",' N '" ~ 0- o o -.l 0) .:: - u ;::l "1:l .s o ):; " o U u <.;:: ';oJ ... f- ";; - ~ .s <( "-1 r/l -.l r--- M N - M '" '" g '" ,: '" '" ... o o 0" " .0 o '" .. o o .,,: a- M '" a- '" '" -' ., ... o ... ~ " bJ) '" "" fJ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .. 0 <0 <0 0 '" 0 0 0 0 0 0 '" 0 0 ~ '" 0 '" '" '" 0 '" 00 0 0 0 '" '" '" 00 " 0 00 "'. 1:--. 'D "'. 00_ 0, '" "'. ~ '" "'. "'- a 0 ",- ori ~ '" 00' '" '" '" '" '" I:-- 00 00 'D :1 I:-- 'D '" '" I:-- ~ '" '" '" ~ '" '" '" 0 .. ~ ~ '" ~ '" '" '" 'D C) '" '" '" '" .. ~ - '" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 "< 0 0 0 0 ": 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i':.. 0 '" oj '" ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 '" 0 .. 0 I:-- '" '" '" '" 00 0 0 '" '" '" '" 'Z '" O. '" '" '" '" '" '" '" ~ ~ '" '" ..,,, 0 '" '" '" ~ 1:--- '" 00' u ll! I:-- '" ~ '" ~ '" '" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 If 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .. 0 '" '" m <0 0 0 0 m 0 ~ ~ '" 0 0 '" 0 00 0 "' '" ~ '" '" I:-- 0 0 '" 'D '" .~ " O. 1:--. 00. '" "'. ~ 'D. O'. N 1:--_ "'. ~ "'- 00_ ... 0 '" I:-- '" ",- N '" ~ ~ '" ~ N 1:--' N '" u :1 '" I:-- 'D 00 ~ '" '" '" ~ '" ~ '" 2 .. ~ ~ '" ~ '" '" '" '" 'D '" '" '" '" ... ci ~ = -0-- -.-- --- ~ -- 0 ... 0 "' 0 0 '" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C) 0 N 0 '" "< ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 '" 'D N ~ '" 0 m 0 ~ '" 0; .!!I .... 0 I:-- 00 'D N '" '" 00 I:-- '" 0 '" 'D -'" 0 '" '" '" '" '" '" N 00 "'- ~ "'- ~ "'0 '" '" '" '" '" "u N '" == '" ~ ~ rI.l ~ '" '" '" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ '" 0 0 0 '" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 "< ol .. 00 0 '" 0 oj m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ '" 00 'D '" 'D '" N 'D 0 I:-- 0 0 'D 0 0 " 00 1:--, '" "'. "'- "'- 'D. 'D, N I:-- "'. 'D O. "'. 0 N' ~ ori I:-- N I:-- 'D ~ '" '" N .0 '" 0 :! :1 '" '" ~ 'D 0 ~ '" '" ~ '" N '" .. '" ~ '" ~ ~ '" '" '" 'D = '" '" '" '" ol U .~ 0 0 0 0 0 '" 0 0 0' 0 0 0 0 .. '" 0 0 0 "' "' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .. 00 0 00 00 I:-- ~ m 0 0 0 0 0 0 a.. .. '" '" 'D 'D N '" '" 0 I:-- '" 0 00 0 <i" '" "'- '" '" '" '" ~ '" N '" "- ~ 0_ 0 '" '" '" '" '" :;;!" u '" '" '" '" ~ N '" '" '" -' ",' .. .. ~ ~ 0 '" =- .. 0 .~ '" E ~ .:;; u u Cl .... '" '" " .... " " <8 '" 0 U "0 >< '" '" '" '" = " '6 '" 0 .-"! u '" -.i'".;: dl '" u ..l .s u " 0- '" P.. ~ i;l= - E ~:E ., "0 ., - "0 u ..: .. ... 'Oii ~ ~ u "ii - ~ u ~ ~ 0- r.n Cll'Oii 0 '" ~ '" CIl Cll z~ '" '" " 'Oii on '" ..= ,- 0 0 ~ u ... - "0 0- ;. u ~ Z - .t:: N = \C ;::l '" " '" , CIl "' u~ " ce: ~ " ., 0 ;. OIJ U ~ "" 6 - .S '"0 .::; u OIJ "0 5i, 5i, 0 '" ..;- ., - ~'" ~ " '" " (-/l " '" ., u u .... (-/l 0- S .. ., Cll " '" ~ '6 ;;; CJ lJ 0 .. ... '" OIJ '0 .... " ;::l 0< - '" s 0 ~ ~ - ;0 '" ~ ;::l - u 0 E '" ....l r.n '6 0 u " ~ - u ~ ., .D .... U '" OIJ S u u U ;. " 0 = ..= 2 " u 3 u ~ "0 "0 ~ ;::l " .. "0 '" - 0 5h .D OIJ 0 5h " " "" 'C = "'" s Cll -" "0 .... .g U .... "0 u " > ., ",' OIJ '" 0 '" u '" " ~ .. 6 ~<<J ce: ~ u -< S " u " '" "0 0 < '" '" 0 ~ 0- 0 " U 0 ;: OIJ - ~ u " "0 " ~ CIl U OIJ .E ~ = .. .. " " OJ ....l ~ u il:: - ~ " u r.. ; 'C ;. .D '" '" <.::: ., -" "0 " " 3 OJ D.. 'Oii ~ ~ u " " 0- U cj '" ~ '" u u 2 "0 '6' '6' ~ E ~ " ~ ~ ",- >< '" -< -< '" '" '" .... oU u --l ;0 f-< f-< f-< I- ,. - N ~ 0 C') 0 \D .". - N - r--- - If: r--- ~ r--- .". 0 ~ ~ N N .". r--- on N N ~ - - 0 - N ,..; '" '" ~ r--: 00 0. 0 - N ,..; JjU '" - - - - '" <IJ Cll '" <l. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .; 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 ... 0 '" '" 0 t- O 0 0 0 0 0 '" 0 cD = '" 0 '" 0 ". t- O 0 0 0 0 0 ". 0 - ... 0 o. '" "'- - 0_ ". "'. O. '" "'- 0_ 00_ o. -- ,; 0 '" 00' - ",- '" 00 '" ". ffi - '" '" ". - :; - t- '" '" '" - ffi ffi ffi - ffi ;J; '" e ., - - ffi - ffi ffi ffi '" ffi ffi ffi ffi .. ol :=- -- - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <l5 0 '" 0 0 '" '" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .t 0 00 .,: N .,: - 0 0 0 0 0 '" 0 ...... 0 t- '" '" '" ffi 0 0 0 '" 0 00 0 -"- O. ffi ffi ffi ffi - O. '" t- O - O. .. "'0 '" ffi - ffi ffi ",' ffi ". ol OW - ffi - ". := - ffi ffi ffi ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ... 0 '" '" 0 U; U; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - ~ Z 0 '" '" - t- t- O 0 0 '" 0 '" 0 t- O 0, "' "'- "'. '" '" "'. '" '" "'. O. '" O. - .. a 0 '" "' '" '" ",' 00' '" '" ffi - '" ",' - t-' .. 0 :; - '" - '" '" - ffi ffi ffi - ffi '" ". 6u ., - - ffi - ffi ffi ffi ffi '" ffi ffi ffi ffi '!! ~ -- --", f--- I>. .~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 =... 0 0 0 0 0 '" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 :s " 0 cD oj '" u; - 0 0 0 u; 0 0 0 (/J ol ...... 0 00 ~ '" '" ffi 0 "' 0 '" 0 '" 0 .. _ 00 0 ffi ffi ffi - '" '" t- O. '" o. d "'0 ri ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi Ow '" - - - '" 0 - ffi ffi U ffi -' en ., ... ~ ~ 0 " :=:- ... 0 S 'il a :t:: - " " 00 Q ... " 00 ol ... 0 "" <8 ~ 0 "t:l <:> " 1il '" <:> = ] '6 '" 0 " ..; .- OJ " " ..... 1il ...1 '" u 0, :: 00 0. ~ Sl ..... a ;,Q '" "t:l "" '" -0 u -< '" .. '" ~ ~ " -= ..... ::;;: u " ~ 0, " CI:l OJ)," ;> 0 00 '" ~ 00 <Zl OJ) Z c:z:: " 00 0 '" V) " -= .- 0 0 ~ " ... ..... "t:l 0, .~ ;> N " ~ z ..... = \0 o 00 00 , <Zl '" u~ ~ ol ~ ~ '" 0 ;> OJ) " ::;;: "" 8 ..... .5 '"0 K " OJ) "t:l @, ,g, 0 ::E '" .... ..... ~" ol " ol >= 00 '" '" OJ " ... Ul 0, Q > '" OJ) ol '" en '6 - 0 <Zl " 0 ... " - ... ol '" .. OJ) 0 " 0 " - " s 0 Il'l =- ..... ;i5 " :r: 0 - Q 0 a s ~ CI:l 0 " ol ~ - " ~ .n '6 u 00 OJ) ,5 U ;> '" ~ ... ... " " :.:i OJ 0 = -= ol " 0 " ~ "t:l -0 E ol .f -0 ..... 6b .n OJ) 0 6b ol "- "'" = '<t' 5 OJ) -" "t:l ... '" .n U OJ) " ... " '" "t:l u >= ;.. d' 0 0 " 0 > 8 z <<l OJ -< a ol OJ " " ~ 0 s ~ OJ ::;;: 0, 0 ol '0 0 <: ;> 00 B u 0 ;: OJ) - " ol "t:l ol <Zl U OJ) .s ~ = .. "- " ~ '" ~ en u p; - - " u ~ Oi ';: ;> -" 00 '" ~ '" ol ol -" 0 '" "t:l " " '3 -;; 5- -;; 4-< ~ :: u " u 0, U " -0 '6' '6' - E - ol '" 00 00 '" 00 ;, - '" 0 K -< ..,: ..,: ... -< -< .s " .s ... rJl ~ C " U U - <Zl f-< Q <Zl <Zl <Zl <Zl ... ... <Zl Z Z Z Z >- -< -< -< -< <Zl -< <Zl Il'l ;;: ~ 0 0 0 0 <Zl U.l U.l U.l W-l ~ U.l ~ 0 f-< f-< f-< f-< >- - N '" 0 '" 0 '-D " - N t- - ... t- '" t- " 0 '" '" N N " t- V) '" '" '" - - 0 - N '" .,,: vi 'J:i ,...: oci '" 6 - N '" / JJ) '" - - - - 0) 0) bJJ ro P.. VICINITY MAP UPLAND ALM DND i < z u ~ w w ~ u r < o "''' \;"'" '\ \\ ~ ETI~~A CHANNEL 'l~?~\ /"-iMLSC ~--~/ - /.' AT&SfRR 9 < III 6th 51REEf r" .' .4thS~EET:1 ; '; :J .p---)CUCAMONGA ::,ONTARIO ~ I....--JGAUSTi PARK' I 10 FREEWAY PROJECT SITE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MILLIKEN AVENUE (4TH ST.-am ST.) PAVEMENT REHABIIJTATION O ,/.7'" ~.y/ "<'\ !/\'" ~-;-,'. F,''- ,- J /"r N r ! :v 'N.T.~) 2/ STAFF REpORT ~"" ", -,,--'''/':''.-', ",<".'" . ''- 4~ '\, . " rJ ,};".._.,. L( ___-< \,-,."",,,,,,,, ,'~Y,'.,'-,',,' ~{~;r; ~jt--:- R<\.NCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERlNG DEPARTMENT Date: April 19, 2006 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer By: Mark N, Brawthen, Contract Engineer Subject: APPROVAL OF A STREET FRONTAGE REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF STREET AND PARKWAY IMPROVEMENTS ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 6TH STREET, WEST OF HYSSOP DRIVE (APPROXIMATELY 170 FEET) IN CONJUNCTION WITH DEVELOPMENT OF PARCEL MAP 16010, SUBMITTED BY RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, SRA-42 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the street frontage Reimbursement Agreement for construction of street and parkway improvements on the south side of 6th Street, west of Hyssop Drive (approximately 170 feet), and authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause same to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS As a Condition of Approval of Parcel Map 16010, RKW Development Corporation, the Developer, was required to construct street and parkway improvements on the south side of 6th Street, west of Hyssop Drive (approximately 170 feet). The above-required street improvements have been completed by the developer and accepted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The developer has submitted an itemized statement to the City to be reimbursed by future developer(s) for the construction costs of said street improvements. Staff has reviewed and concurs with the final amount. The total cost of said reimbursable improvements is $30,447.00. Upon development of adjacent properties they will be conditioned to reimburse RKW Development. Copies of the agreement signed by the Developer are available in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted, ~ i !tl~ Willia J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:MB:pjb Attachments /22 Foothill 66 '" '" > > <<: <<: Arrow ..c:: lD ... ~ c: 'M ~ EO '" <( lD ~ c: Reimburseplent Area Q) > t. PMI6010 <( 0 " c: c: Q) 0 ~ ~ :;:; 5i w 4th Street City of Rancho Cucamonga ENGINEERING DIVISION LO >. o ~ lD ~ ...... ~ 10 10 Freeway VICINITY MAP N.T.S. Item: SRA-42 Title: VICINITY MAP EXHIBIT: 1 113 0 > .i:..... ~ Q e Q.J:1; '" ~ gill '" '" . . .<= c: ... "'- '" .h '" ZlD .!!! c: ... .ll .ar .ar ] Illg 1'1 N oll Co c; 010 III ~ ++ 010 on", - , ,l, V/VI'] 3'I:J=/- - ---, '\' \ '-- ' '--- ~'\\ ~;.\\\~(, I r $ s(.J '" .!O ;; ~ I 1:l Q) > 'C O. c.' 0: III ;., Ill' .>'" ... X' t- O 2 - ul 0 2:- -.!l uJ l1> ~ ll:: lL ::; Ii) >- ~ aJ W ll:: 0 u..I . u. ....J ~ -- a ....J it t- ~ :: (\J -<( 2- <Fl Z :::r ~ H r:- I aU!l ~lJado.Jd "'"- B6.~O+Bl <<:) <( a - ~ ~ :r: a If) co ~ >< u.J Q) > ... .C .., ~ o ::: a. o '" N ~P'JN r .... , -' I / - 7. ,Alto \, o o -0 ~ 5./-r ) 11 EXHIBIT "B" CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION COST FOR REIMBURSEMENT PURPOSES - RELATED TO PM 16010 SOUTHSIDE 6TH STREET, WEST OF HYSSOP- ACROSS APN: 229-283-9 FILE: SRA - 42 ITEM AMOUNT I. Grading: (Removals, Clear & Grub, mass excavation) $ -2,100.00 2. Street Pavement $ 2,785.00 3. Street Curb & Gutter $ 1,945.00 4. Striping, Pavement Markings, Signs $ 800.00 5. Adjust Existing Manhole and Valves to Grade $ 1,000.00 6. Fire Hydrant $ 6,110.00 7. Sidewalk and Access Ramp $ 2,660.00 8. Street Trees, Landscaping & Irrigation $ 2,300.00 9. Street Light, Conduit, Edison Cost $ '3,300.00 10. General Contractor Mark-up $ 2.200.00 SUBTOTAL $25,200.00 11. Design, Testing, Survey $ 2,550.00 12. City Engineering Inspection Fee $ 1,068.00 13. City Reimbursement Process Fee (1/2 Fee) $ 1,414.00 14. Bond $ 215.00 TOTAL COST $30,447.00 Refer to: City Drawing No(s): 1939 Sheet(s): 1,3, & 4 /25 RESOLUTION NO. Or: - /23 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A STREET FRONTAGE REIMBURSEMENT (SRA-42) EXECUTED ON APRIL 19, 2006, FOR THE INSTALLATION OF STREET AND PARKWAY IMPROVEMENTS ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 6TH STREET, WEST OF HYSSOP DRIVE (APPROXIMATELY 170 FEET) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has for its consideration a street frontage Reimbursement Agreement submitted by RKW Development Corporation, as developer of Parcel Map 16010 for the installation of street and parkway improvements on the south side of 6th Street, west of Hyssop Drive (approximately 170 feet) - SRA 42; and WHEREAS, the developer, at the developer's expense, has completed said street improvements; and WHEREAS, the developer requests reimbursement from future development for the portion of street improvements beyond the limits of his development as entitled to per the conditions of his development by means of said Reimbursement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES that said reimbursement agreement be and the same is hereby approved, and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said reimbursement agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest hereto and cause said agreement to record. /10 STAFF REpORT ENG!NEERlNG DEPARTMENT Date: April 19, 2006 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer By: Tasha Hunter, Public Service Tech I Subject: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR PARCEL MAP 16323, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF HAVEN A VENUE, SOUTH OF 6TH STREET, SUBMITTED BY LEDESMA & MEYER DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Parcel Map 16323 were approved by the City Council on March 2, 2005, in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: Labor and Material Bond: Monumentation Cash Deposit $ $ $ 82,000.00 41,300.00 2,450.00 Due to weather delays the street improvements have not been completed as expected. The developer, Ledesma & Meyer Development Company, Inc., is requesting approval of a l2-month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's office. Respectively submitted, CJectL~0t William J. O'Neil City Engineer WlO:TCH Attachments /27 I L 1M LEDESMA & MEYER ___ _._____.._--,.-________.__..__.______'.....__.___..._______._~______._~____._.~..________________._.__.___._._____-0-'_'__- D I DEVELOPMENT INC_ April 4, 2006 Tasha Hunter Public Service Tech I The City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 SUBJECT: Improvement Agreement Extension for Parcel Map 16323 Dear Tasha Hunter: Please extend the improvement agreement for Parcel Map 16323 due to weather delays. CC: Joe Ledesma Jeanne Pais /2S t. ,~, ...__ "-..... -".--, -~""- -,,""<> ~"" -- " 7TH STREET ~ ~ ~ ~ < ~ ~ s ~ :s: ~ "'l;: 6TH STREET SITE ~ G ~ ~ ,,~ f:::: ~ ~::s: ::J --.I ::s: ~~ 0 ~ ~ BENTL Y ~ TRADEMA.RK ST. _ t"rH'\ I Y N.T.S 4TH STREET CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA .A N ITEM: ~ MAP 1~~gJJ TITLE: VICINITY J4AF> ENGINEERING DIVISION /J9 RESOLUTION NO. 6&r /2. Y A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR PARCEL MAP 16323 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on April 19, 2006, by Ledesma & Meyer Development Company, Inc., as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the east side of Haven A venue, south of 6th Street; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Parcel Map 16323; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. ' /3D STAFF REpORT ENGINEERlNG DEPARThIENT Date: April 19, 2006 RANCHO CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer By: Tasha Hunter, Public Service Tech I Subject: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR TRACT 14771, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF RINGSTEM AVENUE, EAST OF HAVEN AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY TOLL BROTHERS RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract 14771 were approved by the City Council on March 2, 2005, in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: Labor and Material Bond: Monumentation Cash Deposit $ $ $ 791,900.00 395,950.00 4,500.00 Improvements are still outstanding and are proposed to be completed by this November. The developer, Toll Brothers, is requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's office. Respectively submitted, Q~ O? v1J Wil'~ J. O'NeIl City Engineer WJO:TCH Attachments 13) ~pp CJB3Jr(()tlhlerr~ America's Luxury Home Builder'" April 5, 2006 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Department Engineering Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Sir/Madame: On behalf of Toll Brothers, Inc., regarding Tract 14771, I request your consideration of an extension of our Improvement Agreement. Our construction project of forty homes at The Heights at Haven View is currently moving on schedule and we will begin delivering homes in May. The electrical backbone on Tackstem is now in place and Edison will be charging it soon. Landscaping and curb coring is now in progress and we will be completing the improvements through November. Thank you for y'our consideration, ~~ Project Manager The Heights at Haven View Estates New York Stock Exchange' Symbol TOL 725 Town and Country Rd" Suite 500, Orange, CA 92868 Telephone: (714) 347-1300' FAX: (714) 835-9685 iS2 <,,'. " . "'-' ,"~ ,. ' "! " ',.ii!'~_"" ~~,,-.;.;.- ~ ~,','~h;;P'.-~"'o" ,1-"{';j:" '. -.;.;:. .'':t'~';'~;/~.<>~ :~';"1.',,,, SAN 'BERNARDINO NATIONAl FOREST TAC~STEM PRO.ECT ~ HIDDEN LOCA 110N FARM ROAD ~ CARRARI (1j STREET SOU ER CAN>-Q . I ' ~ 'IV ...J.... a: b~ l*:) T I l.LJ :I: ~ Z . HILLSIDE ROAD ~~' JI I I ~ I[ WILLSON AVENUE II II, II NOT TO sCAlE VICNTY MAP' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION ~ " N lTEM:ZiBfCT .1477/ TITLE: V/C/NITr MAP EXHIBIT: 133 RESOLUTION NO. {)(p - / J. 5 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 1477] WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on April] 9,2006, by Toll Brothers, as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the north side of Ringstem Avenue, east of Haven Avenue; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Tract 14771; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOL YES, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. JjLj STAFF REpORT ENGINEERlNG DEPARTMENT Date: April 19, 2006 RANCHO CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer By: Tasha Hunter, Public Service Tech I Subject: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR TRACT 16454-1, LOCATED SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND ETIWANDA AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY KB HOME GREATER LOS ANGELES INC. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Improvement Agreement and hnprovement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract 16454-1 were approved by the City Council on March 16,2005, in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: Labor and Material Bond: Monumentation Cash Deposit $ $ $ 3,208,700.00 1,604,350.00 8,250.00 The delays by Southern California Edison have prevented the completion of the signal installation and other improvements in the area as required.. The developer, KB Home Greater Los Angeles Inc., is requesting approval of a l2-month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's office. Respectively submitted, I J&C:tULf Willi] to'Neil . City Engineer WJO:TCH Attachments /35 "",,'-"" ,.. ~'. ~w.,.__ ''''-''-"''o'.~''''.''''_ ','.-"';of;i;-",O' ,,' _" "',"'5'~tt<Iilf:>';,,";'~i.;f'-,"':'-rC-':,",,";,m,""-'.'l"~':l)g,,..,:-:='''''H'''''"tcl"!;Jt'''i .".,,'-'-,''''''~''H, w:T1lRJA 5TIlUT l\ - I i ... or. 11_ .m VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION :xr:;mw,,,,,,,Y;';;""'''f :i'JI ;w< ITEM; "(!2ACT MAr- ,vo. {fo454-1 TITLE: VIC{Nf ry MAP EXHIBIT: .i 13b March 21, 2006 Mr. Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer Engineering Division City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: Extension of Improvement Agreement for Tract 16454-1 Dear Mr. James: KB Home requests an extension of the Improvement Agreement for Tract 16454- 1. The request is necessary in order to complete the remaining off site improvements at Base Line Road and Shelby. The delays by Southern California Edison have prevented the completion of the signal installation and other improvements in the area as required by the Conditions 6f Approval. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. If you have any questions, please contact me at (909) 618-1449. Sincerely yours KB HOME Great~os Angele Oz~ 1~~r'f.,9~ Senior Project Manager KB HOME INLAND VALLEY 801 CORPORATE CENTER DR. SUITE 201 POMONA,CA 91768 TEL 909 618 1500 KBHOME.COM /:3 7 RESOLUTION NO. (J to - /2 & A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 16454-1 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on April 19, 2006, by KB Home Greater Los Angeles Inc., as developer, for the improvement of public right-of- way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located southeast comer of Base Line Road and Etiwanda A venue; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Tract 16454-1; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. 13g STAFF REpORT ENGINEERlNG DEPARTMENT Date: April 19, 2006 RANCHO CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer By: Tasha Hunter, Public Service Tech I Subject: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR TRACT 16567, LOCATED BETWEEN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND SAN BERNARDINO ROAD AND BETWEEN HELLMAN AND MALACHITE A VENUES, SUBMITTED BY WL ROUTE 66 ASSOCIATES RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANAL YSIS Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract 16567 were approved by the City Council on April 20, 2006, in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: Labor and Material Bond: Monumentation Cash Deposit $ $ $ 641,200.00 320,600.00 4,000.00 Tract 16567 is not yet completed and is anticipated to be completed within the next twelve (12) months. The developer, WL Route 66 Associates, is requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's office. Respectively submitted, 9t t?Lx/c( William 1. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:TCH Attachments /39 John Laing Homes Hand crafted since 1848 April 3, 2006 Community Development Department Engineering Division 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Main Street at Rte 66 Tract 16567 Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 16567 The Tract 16567 project (Main Street at Route 66) is not yet complete and therefore we are requesting the extension of the Improvement Agreement. We anticipate that the above-mentioned project will be completed within the next twelve (12) months. Your cooperation in allowing us to extend the Improvement Agreement is much appreciated. Please feel free to call myself or my assistant, Christine Moore, with any questions. Sincerely, John Laing Homes d\(J~ ~ Lisa Bass Project Manager LB/cm cc: JLH Realty & Construction Inc John Laing Homes 255 E. Rincon Street Suite 100 Corona CA 92879-1330 tel 951-272-5100 fax 951-738-9454 \vv.'w.john!ainghomes.com Il/ () I,~ ',.',;"'~':\"_"""~'~~~_'-": .",", ,-..,.;.'..-,.....:"... ."'_ ~,o.,.., :;, ~ ,,' , CHURCH ST HEMLOCK ST SAN ~ l;: ~ C) --.J ro 1:: ~ '" ~ a ~ ~ FOOTHILL <: ~ ---J Lj ::r: ~ '" ~ ~. :t ~ :i: (j ::s ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A N ITEM: TIMer 16.567 TITLE: VICINITY MAP ENGINEERING DIVISION ILlI RESOLUTION NO. ()t, - / ;2 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 16567 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on April 19,2006, by WL Route 66 Associates, as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located between Foothill Boulevard and San Bemardino Road and between Hellman and Malachite Avenues; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Tract 16567; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. lil RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~ .~," ".>.., : ."-,':,,-,':';P." ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT '~ " . --.re. ',<:'),-.," ",-,; ,.....:1.J Staff Report DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: April 19, 2006 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Tasha Hunter, Public Svc. Tech I RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE CASH DEPOSIT FOR DRC2003-00319, LOCATED AT THE CUL-DE-SAC TERMINUS OF BIRDSONG PLACE WEST OF HERMOSA AVENUE AND SOUTH OF ALMOND STREET, SUBMITTED BY HARDWOOD HOMES RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Cash Deposit, for DRC2003-00319, located at the Cul-de-sac Terminus of Birdsong Place west of Hermosa Avenue and south, of Almond Street, submitted by Hardwood Homes BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The required one-year maintenance period has ended, and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. DEVELOPER Hardwood Homes 20700 Ventura Blvd. #200 Woodland Hills, Ca 91364 Release: Payer: HIRCO, LLC 20700 Ventura Blvd. # 200 Woodland Hills, Ca 91364 Maintenance Guarantee Cash Deposit Receipt #CR068764 $2,120.00 Respectfully submitted, (-fe;-tt/UU William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:tch Attachment /43 ALMOND T. ITE HillSIDE RD WILSON AVE BANYAN ST ~ ~, <( ~ l- V! 0 W <( -1 <( > <( V! <( ?- m 0 z ~ <( ::E <( J:: a:: ~ iE 0 w w Z ..J :r: > Ct: ..J W a:: <( <( <( ::E <( :r: u :r: <(, City of Rancho Cucamonga ENGINEERING DIVISION Item: Staff Report Title: Vicinity Map EXHIBIT 1: DRC2003-00319 j4Lj STAFF REpORT ENGINEERlNG DEPARTMENT Date: April 19, 2006 RANCHO CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, A1CP, City Council William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Tasha Hunter, Public Service Tech I From: By: Subject: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RETAIN THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND IN LIEU OF A MAINTENANCE BOND AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2004-00145, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF ARROW ROUTE, EAST OF UTICA A VENUE, SUBMITTED BY PUBLIC STORAGE, INC. RECOMMENDATION: The required improvements for Public Storage, Inc. have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to retain the Faithful Performance Bond in lieu of a Maintenance Bond. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: As a condition of approval of completion ofDRC2004-00145, located on the south side of Arrow Route, east of Utica Avenue, the applicant was required to complete street improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City Council retain the existing Faithful Performance Bond in lieu of a Maintenance Bond. Respectfully submitted, CjtC{;~ William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:TCH Attachment(s) 1'-15 - - ~ ~ ~, . ~ ~ "\ '\ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ;:! ~ ~ ~ ~. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A- N ITEM:bhC~l1tr> L!JO/1fG TITLE: .V'IC/NI l'Y .IVJAP ENGINEERING DIVISION )4(, RESOLUTION NO. ()(p -I;{ ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2004-00145 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for DRC2004-00145 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. )tf1 STAFF REpORT ENGINEERlNG DEPARTMENT Date: April 19, 2006 RANCHO CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: William 1. O'Neil, City Engineer By: Tasha Hunter, Public Service Tech I Subject: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND, ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 16612 LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD AND CHURCH STREET, SUBMITTED BY D.R. HORTON LOS ANGELES HOLDING CO., INC. RECOMMENDATION: The required improvements for Tract 16612 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond and accept a Maintenance Bond. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: As a condition of approval of completion of Tract 16612, located on the southwest comer of Day Creek Boulevard and Church Street, the applicant was required to complete improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City Council release the existing Faithful Performance Bond and accept the Maintenance Bond. Developer: D.R. Horton Los Angeles Holding Co., Inc.: 2280 Wardlow Cir., Ste. #100, Corona, Ca 92880 Release: Faithful Performance Bond # 929327241 (Bond No.) # 6397086 (Bond No.) $246,000.00 Accept: Maintenance Bond $ 24,600.00 Respectfully submitted, I /'1'} ~/JO ~C//.'~ William J, O'Neil City Engineer WJO:TCH Attachment(s) /t.f~ ,"'" '" ~;'.".\'OM':<c ~ - ".....'~-_-;r'<..'. '.:_'>kW 'C'." " """c.-", , . ~8 ~-I 1m i ~ i , . --------T------L-- , , t::: ~!;g a:~ i~ ~~ Cl:o Q: J.;:;.O ~,~ . i , i . . -_____nJ . . I I: & . " . .. ! . " E . . " " f .~ . >l . . " t- /'-11 a..II't_~~~ RESOLUTION NO. 6&-1.2 1 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 16612 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 16612 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. I 5 () STAFF REpORT ENGINEERING DEP,IRThlENT Date: April 19, 2006 RANCHO CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer By: Jerry A. Dyer, Senior Civil Engineer jlc;/l Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Technician ~ Subject: RELEASE OF FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND NO. 8193-62-79 IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,768,209.00, FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS IN PHASE 3A OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2003-01 INCLUDING STREET, STORM DRAIN, WATER MAIN, , TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND FIBER OPTIC CONDUITS, CONTRACT NO, 03-135 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond No. 8193-62-79 in the amount of $2,768,209.00, for the Improvements in Phase 3A of Community Facility District 2003-01 Including Street, Storm Drain, Water Main, Traffic Signals and Fiber Optic Conduits, Contract No. 03-135. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street, storm drain and other improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. Contractor: Sequel Contractors, Inc. 13546 Imperial Hwy Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 Respectfully submitted, 9'e Ii ~,Lt William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:JAD/RO:ls Attachment /5/ ViCINITY MAP COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-01 ,. - 111 '" .. '" '" WID " NOT A PARr -,:, . ~ ~ }.....,.:U=L,.J 151 STAFF REpORT ENGINEERlNG DEP,\RTMENT Date: April 19, 2006 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: William J, O'Neil, City Engineer By: Jerry A. Dyer, Senior Civil Engineer O~j) Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Techn1fian~ Subject: RELEASE OF FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND NO. 2042010 IN THE AMOUNT OF $827,058.40, FOR THE LANDSCAPING AND SIDEWALK IN PHASE 1A OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2001-01, CONTRACT NO. 04-011 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond No. 2042010 in the amount of $827,058.40, for the Landscaping and Sidewalk in Phase 1A of Community Facilities District 2001-01, Contract No. 04-011. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the landscape improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. Contractor: Mega Way Enterprises 919 y, North Azusa Avenue Covina, CA 91722 Respectfully submitted, (~e /Z Uti- Willi~ J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:JAD/RO:ls Attachment /53 VICINITY MAP PHASE 1A OF COMMUNITY FACILlTJES DlSI~(CT 2001-01 ,LANDSCAPING AND' SIDEWALK , /I I ii " PROJECT I~ /I , !I LOCATION I ! IFOO11U IJ(J(J.EIIARD - - If .. lD ~ Pw'\.,J~"..J 15~ STAFF REpORT ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Date: April 19, 2006 RANCHO CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer By: Jerry A. Dyer, Senior Civil Engineer ().4? Richard Oaxaca, Engineering TechniJan~ Subject: RELEASE OF FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND NO. 8195-82-23 IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,388,377.70, FOR PHASES 1B(B), 3B(A) & 3B(B) OF CFD'S 2001-01 & 2003-01 FOR STREET, STORM DRAIN, AND RELATED IMPROVEMENTS ON FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, CONTRACT NO. 04-041 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond No. 8195-82-23 in the amount of $1,388,377.70, for Phases 1B(B), 3B(A) & 3B(B) of CFD's 2001-01 & 2003-01 for Street, Storm Drain, and Related Improvements on Foothill Boulevard, Contract No. 04-041. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street and storm drain improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. Contractor: Sequel Contractors, Inc. 13546 Imperial Hwy Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 RespectfUlly submitted, I ice?? (~LL W~. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:JAD/RO:ls Attachment 155 FO ow > <(, ow > ~ co ElN5F RR 8TH 5T ow > GTH 5T I z ow > <( 4TH 5T PROJECT LOCATION CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY FACILmES DISTRICT VICTORIA GARDENS MALL VICINITY MAP STAFF REpORT ENGINEERlNG DEPARTMENT Date: April 19, 2006 RANCHO CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members ofthe City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: William 1. O'Neil, City Engineer By: Tasha Hunter, Public Service Tech I Subject: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND, ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2002-00519 LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND THE 1-15 FREEWAY NORTHBOUND ON RAMP, SUBMITTED BY FOUNTAINHEAD DELTA RECOMMENDATION: The required improvements for DRC2002-00519 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond and accept a Maintenance Bond. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: As a condition of approval of completion of DRC2002-00519, located at the northeast comer of Foothill Boulevard and the 1-15 Freeway northbound on ramp, the applicant was required to complete improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City Council release the existing Faithful Performance Bond and accept the Maintenance Bond. Developer: Fountainhead Delta: 1400 Quail Street, #135, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Release: Faithful Performance Bond $36,400.00 Accept: Maintenance Bond $ 3,640.00 Respectfully submitted, (tc:e t/J1d William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:TCH Attachment(s) i51 RESOLUTION NO. {)f.o-l.3tJ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2002-00519 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for DRC2002-00519 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. /53 'f I / ,1 ! BASE' LINE RD. 'w .>- 'c( W z MILLER ~ LLi w ~ ~ 3 2 ~ & LL.i 0: W ~ :I: BLVD. 0 < tii 0 ~ w x W :I: RT. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~ N ITEM: /)fiC911/J?e>dtJ5/9 TITLE:J!LCINll7' MAP ENGINEERING DIVISION 159 ORDINANCE NO. 757 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 19.12 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE, PROVIDING FOR FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT REGULATIONS The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Chapter 19.12 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is to be amended to read as follows: SECTION 2: 19.12.010 19.12.011 19.12.012 CHAPTER 19.12 FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT REGULATIONS 19.12.010 19.12.020 19.12.030 19.12.040 19.12.050 19.12.060 Authorization, Findinqs. Purpose and Methods Definitions General Provisions Administration Provisions for Flood Hazard Reduction Variance Procedure Authorization, Findinqs. Purpose and Methods STATUTORY AUTHORIZATION. The Legislature of the State of California has in Government Code Sections 65302, 65560, and 65800 conferred upon local government units authority to adopt regulations designed to promote the public health, safety, and general welfare of its citizenry. Therefore, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby adopt the following floodplain management regulations. FINDINGS OF FACT. A. The flood hazard areas of the City are subject to periodic inundation which results in loss of life and property, health and safety hazards, disruption of commerce and governmental services, extraordinary public expenditures for flood protection and relief, and impairment of the tax base, all of which adversely affect the public health, safety, and general welfare. B. These flood losses are caused by uses that are inadequately elevated, flood proofed, or protected from flood damage, The cumulative effect of obstructions in areas of special flood hazards that increase flood heights and velocities also contribute to the flood loss. I too Ordinance No. 757 Page 2 19.12.013 STATEMENT OF PURPOSE. It is the purpose of this ordinance to promote the public health, safety, and general welfare, and to minimize public and private losses due to flood conditions in specific areas by provisions designed to: A. protect human life and health; B. minimize expenditure of public money for costly flood control projects: C. minimize the need for rescue and relief efforts associated with flooding and generally undertaken at the expense of the general public; D. minimize prolonged business interruptions; E. minimize damage to public facilities and utilities such as water and gas mains; electric, telephone and sewer lines; and streets and bridges located in areas of special flood hazard; F. help maintain a stable tax base by providing for the sound use and development of areas of special flood hazard so as to minimize future blighted areas caused by flood damage; G. ensure that potential buyers are notified that property is in an area of special flood hazard; and H. ensure that those who occupy the areas of special flood hazard assume responsibility for their actions. 19.12.014 METHODS OF REDUCING FLOOD LOSSES_ In order to accomplish its purposes, this ordinance includes methods and provisions to: A. restrict or prohibit uses which are dangerous to health, safety, and property due to water or erosion hazards, or which result in dama9ing increases in erosion or flood heights or velocities; B. require that uses vulnerable to floods, including facilities that serve such uses, be protected against flood damage at the time of initial construction; C. control the alteration of natural floodplains, stream channels, and natural protective barriers, which help accommodate or channel floodwaters; D. control filling, grading, dredging, and other development which may increase flood damage; and E. prevent or regulate the construction of flood barriers which will unnaturally divert flood waters or which may increase flood hazards in other areas. 19.12.020 DEFINITIONS Unless specifically defined below, words or phrases used in this ordinance shall be interpreted so as to give them the meaning they have in common usage and to give this ordinance its most reasonable application, 110 I Ordinance No. 757 Page 3 "Accessory use" means a use that is incidental and subordinate to the principal use of the parcel of land on which it is located, "Alluvial fan" means a geomorphologic feature characterized by a cone or fan-shaped deposit of boulders, gravel, and fine sediments that have been eroded from mountain siopes, transported by flood flows, and then deposited on the valley floors, and which is subject to flash flooding, high velocity flows, debris flows, erosion, sediment movement and deposition, and channel migration, "Apex" means the point of highest elevation on an alluvial fan, which on undisturbed fans is generally the point where the major stream that formed the fan emerges from the mountain front. "Appeal" means a request for a review of the Floodplain Administrator's interpretation of any provision of this ordinance. "Area of shallow flooding" means a designated AO or AH Zone on the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM). The base flood depths range from one to three feet; a clearly defined channel does not exist; the path of flooding is unpredictable and indeterminate; and velocity flow may be evident. Such flooding is characterized by ponding or sheet flow. "Area of special flood hazard" - See "Special flood hazard area." "Area of special flood-related erosion hazard" is the land within a community which is most likely to be subject to severe flood-related erosion losses. The area may be designated as Zone E on the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), "Area of special mudslide (i.e., mudflow) hazard" is the area subject to severe mudslides (i.e., mudflows). The area is designated as Zone M on the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM). "Base flood" means a flood which has a one percent chance of being equalled or exceeded in anv qiven vear (also called the"1 OO-yearflood"). Base flood is the term used throughout this ordinance. "Basement" means any area of the building having its floor subgrade - i.e" below qround level - on all sides, "Breakaway walls" are any type of walls, whether solid or lattice, and whether constructed of concrete, masonry, wood, metal, plastic or any other suitable building material which is not part of the structural support of the building and which is designed to break away under abnormally high tides or wave action without causing any damage to the structural integrity of the building on which they are used or any buildings to which they might be carried by flood waters. A breakaway wall shall have a safe design loading resistance of not less than ten and no more than twenty pounds per square foot. Use of breakaway walls must be certified by a registered engineer or architect and shall meet the following conditions: i 1.01 Ordinance No, 757 Page 4 1. breakaway wall collapse shall result from a water load less than that which would occur during the base flood, and 2. the elevated portion of the building shall not incur any structural damage due to the effects of wind and water loads acting simultaneously in the event of the base flood. "Building" - see "Structure." "Coastal high hazard area" means an area of special flood hazard extending from offshore to the inland limit of a primary frontal dune along an open coast and any other area subject to high velocity wave action from storms or seismic sources. It is an area subject to high velocity waters, including coastal and tidal inundation or tsunamis. The area is designated on a Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) as Zone V1-V30, VE, orV. "Development" means any man-made change to improved or unimproved real estate, including but not limited to buildings or other structures, mining, dredging, filling, grading, paving, excavation or drilling operations or storage of equipment or materials. "Encroachment" means the advance or infringement of uses, plant growth, fill, excavation, buildings, permanent structures or development into a floodplain, which may impede or alter the flow capacity of a floodplain. "Existing manufactured home park or subdivision" means a manufactured home park or subdivision for which the construction of facilities for servicing the lots on which the manufactured homes are to be affixed (including, at a minimum, the installation of utilities, the construction of streets, and either final site grading or the pouring of concrete pads) is completed before the effective date of the floodplain management regulations adopted by a community. "Expansion to an existing manufactured home park or subdivision" means the preparation of additional sites by the construction of facilities for servicing the lots on which the manufactured homes are to be affixed (including the installation of utilities, the construction of streets, and either final site grading or the pouring of concrete pads). "Flood, flooding, or flood water" means: 1. a general and temporary condition of partial or complete inundation of normally dry land areas from the overflow of inland or tidal waters; the unusual and rapid accumulation or runoff of surface waters from any source; and/or mudslides (i.e" mudflows)--see "Mudslides"; and 2. the condition resulting from flood-related erosion - see "Flood-related erosion". "Flood Boundary and Floodway Map (FBFM)" means the official map on which the Federal Emergency Management Agency or Federal Insurance Administration has delineated both the areas of special flood hazards and the floodway, /10 3 Ordinance No, 757 Page 5 "Flood Hazard Boundary Map" means the official map on which the Federal Emergency Management Agency or Federal Insurance Administration has delineated the areas of flood hazards. "Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM)" means the official map on which the Federal Emergency Management Agency or Federal Insurance Administration has delineated both the areas of special flood hazards and the risk premium zones applicable to the community. "Flood Insurance Study" means the official report provided by the Federal Insurance Administration that includes flood profiles, the Flood Insurance Rate Map, the Flood Boundary and Floodway Map, and the water surface elevation of the base flood. "Flood-related erosion" means the collapse or subsidence of land along the shore of a lake or other body of water as a result of undermining caused by waves or currents of water exceeding anticipated cyclical levels or suddenly caused by an unusually high water level in a natural body of water, accompanied by a severe storm, or by an unanticipated force of nature, such as a flash flood or an abnormal tidal surge, or by some similarly unusual and unforeseeable event which results in flooding. "Flood-related erosion area" or "Flood-related erosion prone area" means a land area adjoining the shore of a lake or other body of water, which due to the composition of the shoreline or bank and high water levels or wind-driven currents, is likely to suffer flood-related erosion damage. "Flood-related erosion area management" means the operation of an overall program of corrective and preventive measures for reducing flood-related erosion damage, including but not limited to emergency preparedness plans, flood-related erosion control works, and floodplain management regulations. "Floodplain or flood-prone area" means any land area susceptible to being inundated by water from any source - see "Flooding". "Floodplain Administrator" is the individual appointed to administer and enforce the floodplain management regulations. "Floodplain management" means the operation of an overall program of corrective and preventive measures for reducing flood damage and preserving and enhancing, where possible, natural resources in the floodplain, including but not limited to emergency preparedness plans, flood control works, floodplain management regulations, and open space plans. "Floodplain management regulations" means this ordinance and other zoning ordinances, subdivision regulations, building codes, health regulations, special purpose ordinances (such as grading and erosion control) and other application of police power which control development in flood-prone areas. This term describes federal, state or local re9ulations in any combination thereof which provide standards for preventing and reducing flood loss and damage. / (pLj Ordinance No. 757 Page 6 "Flood proofing" means any combination of structural and nonstructural additions, changes, or adjustments to structures which reduce or eliminate flood damage to real estate or improved real property, water and sanitary facilities, structures, and their contents. (Refer to FEMA Technical Bulletins TB 1-93, TB 3-93, and TB 7- 93 for guidelines on dry and wet floodproofing.) "Floodway" means the channel of a river or other watercourse and the adjacent land areas that must be reserved in order to discharge the base flood without cumulatively increasing the water surface elevation more than one foot. Also referred to as "Regulatory Floodway", "Floodway fringe" is that area of the floodplain on either side of the "Regulatory Floodway" where encroachment may be permitted. "Fraud and victimization" as related to Section 6, Variances, of this ordinance, means that the variance granted must not cause fraud on or victimization of the public. In examining this requirement, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will consider the fact that every newly constructed building adds to government responsibilities and remains a part of the community for fifty to one-hundred years. Buildings that are permitted to be constructed below the base flood elevation are subject during all those years to increased risk of damage from floods, while future owners of the property and the community as a whole are subject to all the costs, inconvenience, danger, and suffering that those increased flood damages bring. In addition, future owners may purchase the property, unaware that it is subject to potential flood damage, and can be insured only at very high flood insurance rates. "Functionally dependent use" means a use that cannot perform its intended purpose unless it is located or carried out in close proximity to water. The term includes onlv dockin9 facilities, port facilities that are necessary for the loading and unloading of cargo or passengers, and ship building and ship repair facilities, and does not include long-term storage or related manufacturing facilities. "Governing body" is the local governing unit, Le, county or municipality that is empowered to adopt and implement regulations to provide for the public health, safety and general welfare of its citizenry. "Hardship" as related to Section 6, Variances, of this ordinance means the exceptional hardship that would result from a failure to grant the requested variance. The City Council requires that the variance be exceptional, unusual, and peculiar to the property involved. Mere economic or financial hardship alone is not exceptional. Inconvenience, aesthetic considerations, physical handicaps, personal preferences, or the disapproval of one's neighbors likewise cannot, as a rule, qualify as an exceptional hardship. All of these problems can be resolved through other means without granting a variance, even if the alternative is more expensive, or requires the property owner to build elsewhere or put the parcel to a different use than originally intended, "Highest adjacent grade" means the highest natural elevation of the ground surface prior to construction next to the proposed walls of a structure. lIPS Ordinance No. 757 Page 7 "Historic structure" means any structure that is: 1. listed individually in the National Register of Historic Places (a listing maintained by the Department of Interior) or preliminarily determined by the Secretary of the Interior as meeting the requirements for individual listing on the National Register; 2. certified or preliminarily determined by the Secretary of the Interior as contributing to the historical significance of a registered historic district or a district preliminarily determined by the Secretary to qualify as a registered historic district; 3. individually listed on a state inventory of historic places in states with historic preservation programs which have been approved by the Secretary of Interior; or 4. individually listed on a local inventory of historic places in communities with historic preservation programs that have been certified either by an approved state program as determined by the Secretary of the Interior or directly by the Secretary of the Interior in states without approved programs. "Levee" means a man-made structure, usually an earthen embankment, designed and constructed in accordance with sound engineering practices to contain, control or divert the flow of water so as to provide protection from temporary flooding. "Levee system" means a flood protection system, which consists of a levee, or levees, and associated structures, such as closure and drainage devices, which are constructed and operated in accord with sound engineering practices. "Lowest floor" means the lowest floor of the lowest enclosed area, including basement. (See "Basement" definition). 1. An unfinished or flood resistant enclosure below the lowest floor that is usable solely for parking of vehicles, building access or storage in an area other than a basement area, is not considered a building's lowest floor provided it conforms to applicable non-elevation desi9n requirements, including, but not limited to: a. the wet flood proofing standard in Section 19,12,051 C.3; b. the anchoring standards in Section 19.12.051 A; c. the construction materials and methods standards in Section 19.12.051 B; and d. the standards for utilities in Section 19.12052. 2. For residential structures, all subgrade-enclosed areas are prohibited as they are considered to be basements (see "Basement" definition), This prohibition includes below-grade garages and storage areas, / fo0 Ordinance No, 757 Page 8 "Manufactured home" means a structure, transportable in one or more sections, which is built on a permanent chassis and is designed for use with or without a permanent foundation when attached to the required utilities. The term "manufactured home" does not include a "recreational vehicle". "Manufactured home park or subdivision" means a parcel (or contiguous parcels) of land divided into two or more manufactured home lots for rent or sale. "Market Value" shall be determined by estimating the cost to replace the structure in new condition and adjusting that cost figure by the amount of depreciation, which has accrued since the structure was constructed. The cost of replacement of the structure shall be based on a square foot cost factor determined by reference to a building cost estimating guide recognized by the building construction industry. The amount of depreciation shall be determined by taking into account the age and physical deterioration of the structure and functional obsolescence as approved by the floodplain administrator, but shall not include economic or other forms of external obsolescence. Use of replacement costs or accrued depreciation factors different from those contained in recognized building cost estimating guides may be considered only if such factors are included in a report prepared by an independent professional appraiser and supported by a written explanation of the differences, "Mean sea level" means, for purposes of the National Flood Insurance Program, the National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD) of 1929 or other datum, to which base flood elevations shown on a community's Flood Insurance Rate Map are referenced. "Mudslide" (i.e., mudflow) describes a condition where there is a river, flow or inundation of liquid mud down a hillside, usually as a result of a dual condition of loss of brush cover and the subsequent accumulation of water on the ground, preceded by a period of unusually heavy or sustained rain. "Mudslide (i.e., mudflow) prone area" means an area with land surfaces and slopes of unconsolidated material where the history, geology, and climate indicate a potential for mudflow. "New construction" for floodplain management purposes, means structures for which the "start of construction" commenced on or after the effective date of floodplain management regulations adopted by this community, and includes any subsequent improvements to such structures, "New manufactured home park or subdivision" means a manufactured home park or subdivision for which the construction of facilities for servicing the lots on which the manufactured homes are to be affixed (including at a minimum, the installation of utilities, the construction of streets, and either final site grading or the pouring of concrete pads) is completed on or after the effective date of floodplain management regulations adopted by this community. I to 1 Ordinance No. 757 Page 9 "Obstruction" includes, but is not limited to, any dam, wall, wharf, embankment, levee, dike, pile, abutment, protection, excavation, channelization, bridge, conduit, culvert, building, wire, fence, rock, gravel, refuse, fill, structure, vegetation or other material in, along, across or projecting into any watercourse which may alter, impede, retard or change the direction and/or velocity of the flow of water, or due to its location, its propensity to snare or collect debris carried by the flow of water, or its likelihood of being carried downstream. "One-hundred-year flood" or "100-year flood" - see "Base flood." "Primary frontal dune" means a continuous or nearly continuous mound or ridge of sand with relatively steep seaward and landward slopes immediately landward and adjacent to the beach and subject to erosion and overtopping from high tides and waves during major coastal storms. The inland limit of the primary frontal dune occurs at the point where there is a distinct change from a relatively mild slope. "Public safety and nuisance" as related to Section 6, Variances, of this ordinance means that the granting of a variance must not result in anything which is injurious to safety or health of an entire community or neighborhood, or any considerable number of persons, or unlawfully obstructs the free passage or use, in the customary manner, of any navigable lake, or river, bay, stream, canal, or basin. "Recreational vehicle" means a vehicle which is: 1. built .on a single chassis: 2. 400 square feet or less when measured at the largest horizontal projection; 3. designed to be self-propelled or permanently towable by a light-duty truck; and 4. designed primarily not for use as a permanent dwelling but as temporary living quarters for recreational, camping, travel, or seasonal use. "Regulatory floodway" means the channel of a river or other watercourse and the adjacent land areas that must be reserved in order to discharge the base flood without cumulatively increasing the water surface elevation more than one foot. "Remedy a Violation" means to bring the structure or other development into compliance with State or local floodplain management regulations, or, if this is not possible, to reduce the impacts of its noncompliance. Ways that impacts may be reduced include protecting the structure or other affected development from flood damages, implementing the enforcement provisions of the ordinance or otherwise deterring future similar violations, or reducing State or Federal financial exposure with regard to the structure or other development. "Riverine" means relating to, formed by, or resembling a river (including tributaries), stream, brook, etc. "Sand dunes" mean naturally occurring accumulations of sand in ridges or mounds landward of the beach. /(pZ Ordinance No. 757 Page 10 "Sheet flow area" - see "Area of shallow flooding". "Special flood hazard area (SFHA)" means an area in the floodplain subject to a 1 percent or greater chance of flooding in any given year. It is shown on an FHBM or FIRM as Zone A, AO, A1-A30, AE, A99, AH, V1-V30, VE orV. "Start of construction" includes substantial improvement and other proposed new development and means the date the building permit was issued, provided the actual start of construction, repair, reconstruction, rehabilitation, addition, placement, or other improvement was within 180 days from the date of the permit. The actual start means either the first placement of permanent construction of a structure on a site, such as the pouring of slab or footings, the installation of piles, the construction of columns, or any work beyond the stage of excavation; or the placement of a manufacture home on a foundation. Permanent construction does not include land preparation, such as clearing, grading, and filling; nor does it include the installation of streets and/or walkways; nor does it include excavation for a basement, footings, piers, or foundations or the erection of temporary forms; nor does it include the installation on the property of accessory buildings, such as garages or sheds not occupied as dwelling units or not part of the main structure. For a substantial improvement, the actual start of construction means the first alteration of any wall, ceiling, floor, or other structural part of a building, whether or not that alteration affects the external dimensions of the building. "Structure" means a walled and roofed building that is principally above ground; this includes a gas or liquid storage tank or a manufactured home. "Substantial damage" means damage of any origin sustained by a structure whereby the cost of restoring the structure to its before damaged condition would equal or exceed 50 percent of the market value of the structure before the damage occurred. "Substantial improvement" means any reconstruction, rehabilitation, addition, or other proposed new development of a structure, the cost of which equals or exceeds 50 percent of the market value of the structure before the "start of construction" of the improvement. This term includes structures that have incurred "substantial damage", regardless of the actual repair work performed. The term does not, however, include either: 1. any project for improvement of a structure to correct existing violations or state or local health, sanitary, or safety code specifications which have been identified by the local code enforcement official and which are the minimum necessary to assure safe living conditions, or 2. any alteration of a "historic structure", provided that the alteration will not preclude the structure's continued designation as a "historic structure". "V Zone" - see "Coastal high hazard area", /iR1 Ordinance No. 757 Page 11 "Variance" means a grant of relief from the requirements of this ordinance that permits construction in a manner that would otherwise be prohibited by this ordinance. "Violation" means the failure of a structure or other development to be fully compliant with this ordinance. A structure or other development without the elevation certificate, other certifications, or other evidence of compliance required in this ordinance is presumed to be in violation until such time as that documentation is provided. "Water surface elevation" means the height, in relation to the National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD) of 1929, (or other datum, where specified) of floods of various magnitudes and frequencies in the floodplains of coastal or riverine areas. "Watercourse" means a lake, river, creek, stream, wash, arroyo, channel or other topographic feature on or over which waters flow at least periodically. Watercourse includes specifically designated areas in which substantial flood damage may occur. 19.12.030 GENERAL PROVISIONS 19.12.031 LANDS TO WHICH THIS ORDINANCE APPLIES. This ordinance shall apply to all areas of special flood hazards within the jurisdiction of the City. 19.12.032 BASIS FOR ESTABLISHING THE AREAS OF SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD. The areas of special flood hazard identified by the Federal Insurance Administration (FIA) of the Federal Emergency ManagemehtAgency (FEMA) in the Flood Insurance Studv (FIS) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga dated March 5, 1984 and accompanying Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) and Flood Boundary and Floodway Maps (FBFMs), dated January 17, 1997, and all subsequent amendments and/or revisions, are hereby adopted by reference and declared to be a part of this ordinance. This FIS and attendant mapping is the minimum area of applicability of . this ordinance and may be supplemented by studies for other areas which allow implementation of this ordinance and which are recommended to the City Council by the Floodplain Administrator. The study, FIS, FIRMs and FBFMs are on file in the office of the City Engineer located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729. 19.12.033 COMPLIANCE. No structure or land shall hereafter be constructed, located, extended, converted, or altered without full compliance with the term of this ordinance and other applicable regulations. Violation of the requirements (including violations of conditions and safeguards established in connection with conditions) shall constitute a misdemeanor. Nothing herein shall prevent the City Council from taking such lawful action as is necessary to prevent or remedy any violation, /10 Ordinance No. 757 Page 12 19.12.034 19.12.035 19.12.036 19.12.037 19.12.040 19.12.041 ABROGATION AND GREATER RESTRICTIONS. This ordinance is not intended to repeal, abrogate, or impair any existing easements, covenants, or deed restrictions. However, where this ordinance and another ordinance, easement, covenant, or deed restriction conflict or overlap, whichever imposes the more stringent restrictions shall prevail. INTERPRETATION. In the interpretation and application of this ordinance, all provisions shall be: A. considered as minimum requirements; B. liberally construed in favor of the governing body; and C. deemed neither to limit nor repeal any other powers granted under state statutes. WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY. The degree of flood protection required by this ordinance is considered reasonable for regulatory purposes and is based on scientific and engineering considerations, Larger floods can and will occur on rare occasions. Flood heights may be increased by man-made or natural causes. This ordinance does not imply that land outside the areas of special flood hazards or uses permitted within such areas will be free from flooding or flood damages. This ordinance shall not create liability on the part of City Council, any officer or employee thereof, the State of California, or the Federal Insurance Administration, Federal Emergency Management Agency, for any flood damages that result from reliance on this ordinance or any administrative decision lawfully made hereunder. SEVERABILITY. This ordinance and the various parts thereof are hereby declared to be severable. Should any section of this ordinance be declared by the courts to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the ordinance as a whole, or any portion thereof other than the section so declared to be unconstitutional or invalid, ADMINISTRATION ESTABLISHMENT OF DEVELOPMENT PERMIT. A development permit shall be obtained before any construction or other development begins within any area of special flood hazard established in Section 12.19.032. Application for a development permit shall be made on forms furnished by the Floodplain Administrator and may include, but not be limited to: plans in duplicate drawn to scale showing the nature, location, dimensions, and elevation of the area in question; existing or proposed structures, fill, storage of materials, drainage facilities; and the location of the foregoing, Specifically, the following information is required: /7/ 19.12.042 19.12.043 Ordinance No. 757 Page 13 A. Site Plan, including but not limited to: 1. for all proposed structures, spot ground elevations at building corners and 20-foot or smaller intervals along the foundation footprint, or one foot contour elevations throughout the building site; and 2. proposed locations of water supply, sanitary sewer, and utilities; and 3. if available, the base flood elevation from the Flood Insurance Study and/or Flood Insurance Rate Map; and 4. if applicable, the location of the regulatory floodway. B. Foundation design detail, including but not limited to: 1. proposed elevation in relation to mean sea level, of the lowest floor (including basement) of ali structures; and 2. for a crawl-space foundation, location and total net area of foundation openings as required in Section 19.12.051 C.3 of this ordinance and FEMA Technical Bulletins 1-93 and 7-93; and 3. for foundations placed on fill, the location and height of fill, and compaction requirements (compacted to 95 percent using the Standard Proctor Test method); and C. Proposed elevation in relation to mean sea level to,which any nonresidential structure will be floodproofed, as required in Section 19.12.051 C.3 of this ordinance and FEMA Technical Bulletin TB 3-93; and D. All appropriate certifications listed in Section 19,12.043 D of this ordinance; and E. Description of the extent to which any watercourse will be altered or relocated as a result of proposed development. DESIGNATION OF THE FLOODPLAIN ADMINISTRATOR. The City Engineer is hereby appointed to administer, implement, and enforce this ordinance by granting or denying development permits in accord with its provisions. DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE FLOODPLAIN ADMINISTRATOR. The duties and responsibilities of the Floodplain Administrator shall include, but not be limited to the following: A. Permit Review. Review all development permits to determine that: 1. permit requirements of this ordinance have been satisfied, 2. all other required state and federal permits have been obtained, 3. the site is reasonably safe from flooding, and /72 Ordinance No. 757 Page 14 4. the proposed development does not adversely affect the carrying capacity of areas where base flood elevations have been determined but a floodway has not been designated. For purposes of this ordinance, "adversely affects" means that the cumulative effect of the proposed development when combined with all other existing and anticipated development will increase the water surface elevation of the base flood more than one foot at any point. B. Review. Use and Development of Other Base Flood Data. 1. When base flood elevation data has not been provided in accordance with Section 19,12.032, the Floodplain Administrator shall obtain, review, and reasonably utilize any base flood elevation and floodway data available from a federal or state agency, or other source, in order to administer Section 19.12.050. Any such information shall be submitted to the City Council for adoption; or 2. If no base flood elevation date is available from a federal or state agency or other source, then a base flood elevation shall be obtained using one of two methods from the FEMA publication "Managing Floodplain Development in Approximate Zone A Areas - A Guide for Obtaining and Developing Base (100-year) Flood Elevations" dated July 1995 in order to administer Section 19.12,050: a. Simplified method i. 100 year or base flood discharge shall be obtained using the appropriate regression equation found in a U.S. Geological Survey publication, or the discharge-drainage area method; and ii. base flood elevation shall be obtained using the Quick-2 computer program developed by FEMA; or b. Detailed method i. 100 year or base flood discharge shall be obtained using the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' HEC-HMS computer program; and ii. base flood elevation shall be obtained using the U.S. Army Corps or Engineer's HEC-RAS computer program. C. Notification of Other AQencies. In alteration or relocation of a watercourse: 1. notify adjacent communities and the California Department of Water Resources prior to alteration or relocation; 2. submit evidence of such notification to the Federal Insurance Administration, Federal Emergency Management Agency; and 3. assure that the flood carrying capacity within the altered or relocated portion of said watercourse is maintained. /73 19.12.044 19.12.050 19.12.051 Ordinance No. 757 Page 15 D. Documentation of Floodplain Development. Obtain and maintain for public inspection and make available as needed the following: 1. certification required by Section 19.12.051 C.1 and 19.12.054 (lowest floor elevations), 2. certification required by Section 19,12.051 C.2 (elevation or flood proofing of nonresidential structures), 3. certification required by Sections 19.12.051 C.3 (wet flood proofing standard), 4. certification of elevation required by Section 19.12.053 B (subdivision standards), 5. certification required by Section 19.12.056 A (floodway encroachments), 6. reports required by Section 19.12.057 C (mudflow standards). E. Map Determinations. Make interpretations where needed, as to the exact location of the boundaries of the areas of special flood hazard. Where there appears to be a conflict between a mapped boundary and actual field conditions, grade and base flood elevations shall be used to determine the boundaries of the special flood hazard area. The person contesting the location of the boundary shall be given a reasonable opportunity to appeal the interpretation as provided in Section 19.12,060. F. Remedial Action. Take action to remedy violations of this ordinance as specified in Section 19.12.033. APPEALS. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall hear and decide appeals when it is alleged there is an error in any requirement, decision, or determination made by the Floodplain Administrator in the enforcement or administration of this ordinance. PROVISIONS FOR FLOOD HAZARD REDUCTION STANDARDS OF CONSTRUCTION. In all areas of special flood hazards the following standards are required: A. Anchoring 1. All new construction and substantial improvements shall be adequately anchored to prevent flotation, collapse or lateral movement of the structure resulting from hydrodynamic and hydrostatic loads, including the effects of buoyancy. /7Y Ordinance No. 757 Page 16 2. All manufactured homes shall meet the anchoring standards of Section 19.12.054. B. Construction materials and methods. All new construction and substantial improvement shall be constructed: 1. with flood resistant materials as specified in FEMA Technical Bulletin TB 2- 93, and utility equipment resistant to flood damage; 2. using methods and practices that minimize flood damage; 3. with electrical, heating, ventilation, plumbing and air conditioning equipment and other service facilities that are designed andlor located so as to prevent water from entering or accumulating within the components during conditions of flooding; and if 4. within Zones AH or AO, so that there are adequate drainage paths around structures on slopes to guide flood waters around and away from proposed structures. C. Elevation and floodproofinQ. (See Section 19.12.010 Definitions for "Basement", "Lowest Floor", "New Construction", "Substantial Damage" and "Substantiallmprovement",) 1. Residential construction, new or substantial improvement, shall have the lowest floor, including basement, a. in an AO zone, elevated above the highest adjacent grade to a height exceeding the depth number specified in feet on the FIRM by at least two feet, or elevated at least four feet above the highest adjacent grade if no depth number is specified. b. in an A zone, the lowest floor elevated to at least two feet above the base flood elevation; said base flood elevation shall be determined by one of the methods in Section 19.12.043 B of this ordinance. c. in all other Zones, elevated to at least two feet above the base flood elevation. Upon the completion of the structure, the elevation of the lowest floor including basement shall be certified by a registered professional engineer or surveyor, and verified by the community building inspector to be properly elevated, Such certification and verification shall be provided to the Floodplain Administrator. 2. Nonresidential construction, new or substantial improvement, shall either be elevated to conform with Section 19.12,051 C.1 or together with attendant utility and sanitary facilities a. be floodproofed below the elevation recommended under Section 19.12.051 C,1 so that the structure is watertight with walls substantially impermeable to the passage of water; /75 19.12.052 19.12.053 Ordinance No. 757 Page 17 b. have structural components capable of resisting hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loads and effects of buoyancy; and c. be certified by a registered professional engineer or architect that the standards of this section (19.12.051 C.2) are satisfied. Such certification shall be provided to the Floodplain Administrator. 3. All new construction and substantial improvement with fully enclosed areas below the lowest floor (excluding basements) that are usable soley for parking of vehicles, building access or storage, and which are subject to flooding, shall be designed to automatically equalize hydrostatic flood forces on exterior walls by allowing for the entry and exit of floodwater. Designs for meeting this requirement shall follow the guidelines in FEMA Technical Bulletins TB 1-93 and TB 7-93, and must exceed the following minimum criteria: a. have a minimum of two openings having a total net area of not less than one square inch for every square foot of enclosed area subject to flooding. The bottom of all openings shall be no higher than one foot above grade. Openings may be equipped with screens, louvers, valves or other coverings or devices provided that they permit the automatic entry and exit of floodwater; or b. be certified by a registered professional engineer or architect. 4. Manufactured homes shall also meet the standards in Section 19,12,054. STANDARDS FOR UTILITIES. A. All new and replacement water supply and sanitary sewage systems shall be designed to minimize or eliminate: 1. infiltration of flood waters into the systems, and 2. discharge from the systems into flood waters, B. On-site waste disposal systems shall be located to avoid impairment to them, or contamination from them during flooding. STANDARDS FOR SUBDIVISIONS. A. All preliminary subdivision proposals shall identify the special flood hazard area and the elevation of the base flood, B. All subdivision plans will provide the elevation of proposed structure(s) and pad(s). If the site is filled above the base flood elevation, the lowest floor and pad elevations shall be certified by a registered professional engineer or surveyor and provided to the Floodplain Administrator. /710 Ordinance No. 757 Page 18 C. All subdivision proposals shall be consistent with the need to minimize flood damage. D. All subdivision proposals shall have public utilities and facilities such as sewer, gas, electrical and water systems located and constructed to minimize flood damage. E. All subdivisions shall provide adequate drainage to reduce exposure to flood hazards. 19.12.054 STANDARDS FOR MANUFACTURED HOMES. A. All manufactured homes that are placed or substantially improved, within Zones A1-30, AH, and AE on the community's Flood Insurance Rate Map, on sites located: 1. outside of a manufactured home park or subdivision, 2. in a new manufactured home park or subdivision, 3. in an expansion to an existing manufactured home park or subdivision, or 4. in an existing manufactured home park or subdivision on a site upon which a manufactured home has incurred "substantial damage" as the result of a flood, shall be elevated on a permanent foundation such that the lowest floor of the manufactured home is elevated to at least two feet above the base flood elevation and be securely fastened to an adequately anchored foundation system to resist flotation, collapse, and lateral movement. B. All manufactured homes that are placed or substantially improved on sites located within Zones V1-30, V, and VE on the community's Flood Insurance Rate Map will meet the requirements of Section 19.12.054 A and Section 19.12.057, C. All manufactured homes to be placed or substantially improved on sites in an existing manufactured home park or subdivision within Zones A1-30, AH, AE, V1-30, V, and VE on the community's Flood Insurance Rate Map that are not subject to the provisions of paragraph 5.4 A will be securely fastened to an adequately anchored foundation system to resist flotation, collapse, and lateral movement, and be elevated so that either the: 1. lowest floor of the manufactured home is at least two feet above the base flood elevation, 2, manufactured home chassis is supported by reinforced piers or other foundation elements of at least equivalent strength that are no less than 36 inches in height above grade, Upon the completion of the structure, the elevation of the lowest floor including basement shall be certified by a registered professional engineer or surveyor, and verified by the community building inspector to be properly elevated, Such certification and verification shall be provided to the Floodplain Administrator. /77 19.12.055 19.12.056 19_12.057 Ordinance No. 757 Page 19 STANDARDS FOR RECREATIONAL VEHICLES. A. All recreation vehicles placed on sites within Zones A1-30, AH, and AE on the community's Flood Insurance Rate Map will either: 1. be on the site for fewer than 180 consecutive days, and be fully licensed and ready for highway use - a recreational vehicle is ready for highway use if it is on its wheels or jacking system, is attached to the site only by quick disconnect type utilities and security devices, and has no permanently attached additions, or 2. meet the permit requirements of Section 19.12.040 of this ordinance and the elevation and anchoring requirements for manufactured homes in Section 19.12.054 A. FLOODWAYS. Located within areas of special flood hazard established in Section 19.12.032 are areas designated as floodways, Since the floodway is an extremely hazardous area due to the velocity of flood waters, which carry debris, potential projectiles, and erosion potential, the following provisions apply: A. Prohibit encroachments, including fill, new construction, substantial improvement, and other new development unless certification by a registered professional en9ineer is provided demonstrating that encroachments shall not result in any increase in [the base] flood elevation during the occurrence of the base flood discharge. B. If Section19.12.056 A is satisfied, all new construction, substantial improvement, and other proposed new development shall comply with all other applicable flood hazard reduction provisions of Section 19.12.050. MUDSLlDE (i.e., MUDFLOW) PRONE AREAS A. The Floodplain Administrator shall review permits for proposed construction of other development to determine if it is proposed within a mudslide area, B. Permits shall be reviewed to determine that the proposed site and improvement will be reasonably safe from mud slide hazards. Factors to be considered in making this determination include but are not limited to: 1. the type and quality of soils, 2. evidence of ground water or surface water problems, 3. depth and quality of any fill, 4. overall slope of the site, and 5. weight that any proposed development will impose on the slope. /1~ Ordinance No. 757 Page 20 C. Within areas that may have mudslide hazards, the Floodplain Administrator shall require that: 1. a site investigation and further review be made by persons qualified in , geology and soils engineering; 2. the proposed grading, excavation, new construction, and substantial improvement be adequately designed and protected against mud slide damages; 3. the proposed grading, excavations, new construction, and substantial improvement not aggravate the existing hazard by creating either on-site or off-site disturbances; and 4. drainage, planting, watering, and maintenance not endanger slope stability. 19.12.058 FLOOD-RELATED EROSION-PRONE AREAS. A. The Floodplain Administrator shall require permits for proposed construction and other development within all flood-related erosion-prone areas as known to the community, B. Permit applications shall be reviewed to determine whether the proposed site alterations and improvements will be reasonably safe from flood-related erosion and will not cause flood-related erosion hazards or otherwise aggravate the existing hazard, C. If a proposed improvement is found to be in the path of flood-related erosion or would increase the erosion hazard, such improvement shall be relocated or adequate protective measures shall be taken to avoid aggravating the existing erosion hazard. D. Within Zone E on the Flood Insurance Rate Map, a setback is required for all new development from the ocean, lake, bay, riverfront or other body of water to create a safety buffer consisting of a natural vegetative or contour strip. This buffer shall be designated according to the flood-related erosion hazard and erosion rate, in relation to the anticipated "useful life" of structures, and depending upon the geologic, hydrologic, topographic, and climatic characteristics of the land. The buffer may be used for suitable open space purposes, such as for agricultural, forestry, outdoor recreation and wildlife habitat areas, and for other activities using temporary and portable structures only. 19.12.060 VARIANCE PROCEDURE /11 19.12.61 19.12.062 Ordinance No. 757 Page 21 NATURE OF VARIANCES. The variance criteria set forth in this section of the ordinance are based on the general principle of zoning law that variances pertain to a piece of property and are not personal in nature. A variance may be granted for a parcel of property with physical characteristics so unusual that complying with the requirements of this ordinance would create an exceptional hardship to the applicant or the surrounding property owners. The characteristics must be unique to the property and not be shared by adjacent parcels. The unique characteristic must pertain to the land itself, not to the structure, its inhabitants, or the property owners. It is the duty of the City Council to help protect its citizens from flooding. This need is so compelling and the implications of the cost of insuring a structure built below flood level are so serious that variances from the flood elevation or from other requirements in the flood ordinance are quite rare. The long term goal of preventing and reducing flood loss and damage can only be met if variances are strictly limited. Therefore, the variance guidelines provided in this ordinance are more detailed and contain multiple provisions that must be met before a variance can be properly granted. The criteria are designed to screen out those situations in which alternatives other than a variance are more appropriate. APPEAL BOARD. A. In passing upon requests for variances, the City Council shall consider all technical evaluations, all relevant factors, standards specified in other sections of this ordinance, and the: 1. danger that materials may be swept onto other lands to the injury of others; 2. danger of life and property due to flooding or erosion damage; 3. susceptibility of the proposed facility and its contents to flood damage and the effect of such damage on the existing individual owner and future owners of the property; 4. importance of the services provided by the proposed facility to the community; 5. necessity to the facility of a waterfront location, where applicable; 6. availability of alternative locations for the proposed use, which are not subject to flooding or erosion damage; 7. compatibility of the proposed use with existing and anticipated development; 8. relationship of the proposed use to the comprehensive plan and floodplain management program for that area; 9. safety of access to the property in time of flood for ordinary and emergency vehicles; ;?;D Ordinance No. 757 Page 22 10. expected heights, velocity, duration, rate of rise, and sediment transport of the flood waters expected at the site; and 11. costs of providing governmental services during and after flood conditions, including maintenance and repair of public utilities and facilities such as sewer, gas, electrical, and water system, and streets and bridges. B. Any applicant to whom a variance is granted shall be given written notice over the signature of a community official that: 1. the issuance of a variance to construct a structure below the base flood level will result in increased premium rates for flood insurance up to amounts as high as $25 for $100 of insurance coverage, and 2. such construction below the base flood level increases risks to life and property. It is recommended that a copy of the notice shall be recorded by the Floodplain Administrator in the Office of the County of San Bernardino Recorder and shall be recorded in a manner so that it appears in the chain of title of the affected parcel of land. C. The Floodplain Administrator will maintain a record of all variance actions, including justification for their issuance, and report such variances issued in its biennial report submitted to the Federal Insurance Administration, Federal Emergency Management Agency. 19.12.063 CONDITIONS FOR VARIANCES. A. Generally, variances may be issued for new construction, substantial improvement, and other proposed new development to be erected on a lot of one-half acre or less in size contiguous to and surrounded by lots with existing structures constructed below the base flood level, providing that the procedures of Sections 19.12.040 and 19.12.050 of this ordinance have been fully considered. As the lot size increases beyond one-half acre, the technical justification required for issuing the variance increases. B. Variances may be issued for the repair or rehabilitation of "historic structures" (as defined in Section 19.12.020 of this ordinance) upon a determination that the proposed repair or rehabilitation will not preclude the structure's continued designation as an historic structure and the variance is the minimum necessary to preserve the historic character and design of the structure. C. Variances shall not be issued within any mapped regulatory floodway if any increase in flood levels during the base flood discharge would result. D. Variances shall only be issued upon a determination that the variance is the "minimum necessary" considering the flood hazard, to afford relief. "Minimum necessary" means to afford relief with a minimum of deviation from the requirements of this ordinance. For example, in the case of variances to an elevation requirement, this means the City Council need not orant permission for the applicant to build at grade, or even to whatever elevation the applicant proposes, but only to that elevation which the City Council believes will both provide relief and preserve the integrity of the local ordinance. / S/ Ordinance No. 757 Page 23 E. Variances shall only be issued upon a: 1. showing of good and sufficient cause; 2. determination that failure to grant the variance would result.in exceptional "hardship" (as defined in Section 19.12.020 of this ordinance) to the applicant; and 3. determination that the granting of a variance will not result in increased flood heights, additional threats to public safety, or extraordinary public expense, create a nuisance (as defined in Section 19.12.020 - see "Public safety or nuisance"), cause fraud or victimization (as defined in Section 19.12.020) of the public, or conflict with existing local laws or ordinances. F. Variances may be issued for new construction, substantial improvement, and other proposed new development necessary for the conduct of a functionally dependent use provided that the provisions of Sections 19.12.063 A through E are satisfied and that the structure or other development is protected by methods that minimize flood damages during the base flood and does not result in additional threats to public safety and does not create a public nuisance. G. Upon consideration of the factors of Section 19.12.061 C and the purposes of this ordinance, the City Council may attach such conditions to the granting of variances as it deems necessary to further the purposes of this ordinance. SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least one in The Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. /~l THE C I T Y o F I RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE: April 19, 2006 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Dan Coleman, Acting City Planner BY: Thomas Grahn, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDING ALLOCATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2006-2007 - A review of the federally required Annual Action Plan, which includes the final selection of CDBG projects, based on a new grant allocation of $1,034,606. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council conduct a public hearing, take public testimony regarding the application for funding, and adopt the Annual Action Plan, thereby authorizing the Mayor to submit the plan to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for their consideration. BACKGROUND: Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds are provided by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) based on a formula that considers census data, extent of poverty, and age of the housing stock. Based upon this formula, the City will receive a grant allocation of $1,034,606, a decrease of $100,002 from our current program- year funding. To be eligible for funding, activities must meet one of the two primary goals of the CDBG program: 1. The development of viable, urban communities, including decent housing and a suitable living environment; and 2. The expansion of economic opportunities, principally for persons of low- and moderate- income. CDBG regulations require that at least 70 percent of all funds be directed to activities that benefit low- and moderate-income persons. Of the activities proposed for the 2006-2007 program-year. approximately 80 percent will benefit low- and moderate-income persons. On March 15, 2006, the City Council conducted a pUblic hearing to take testimony concerning the City's housing and community development needs. At that meeting, several public service organizations that currently receive CDBG funding from the City thanked the Council for the 1~3 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT 2006-2007 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN (CDSG) April 19, 2006 Page 2 continued support of their organizations. The City Council then reviewed the draft Annual Action Plan, and recommended approval without any suggested revisions to the draft funding recommendations prepared by staff. The final Annual Action Plan incorporates the recommended funding allocations of the draft document and any necessary attachments for a complete submittal to HUD. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing, and proposed funding allocat" re published in the Inland Valley Daily Sulletin newspaper on March 20, 2006. ~man Acting City Planner DC:TG/ Attachments: Exhibit "A" Exhibit "S" Fiscal Year 2006-2007 CDSG Funding Recommendations Fiscal Year 2006-2007 Annual Action Plan ,sf FY2006-2007 Final Funding Analysis 3:19 PM April 11 , 2006 Project Title Reauested Prior Year Reprogram Program Income f'roposed Total Allocation, Administration $206,921.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $206,921.00 $206,921.00 Capital Improvement Programs $1,627,000_00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $313,185.00 $313.185.00 Home Improvement Programs $368,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $360,000.00 $360,000.00 Public Service Programs $294,701.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $154,500.00 $154,500.00 Contingency $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 SO.OO SO.OO Total $2,496,622.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $t,034,606.00 $t ,034,606.00 Funding Caps (% of Allocation) Administration (20%) 20.0% Possible Additional to Administration 50.20 Public Service Programs (15"10) 14.9% Possible Additional to Public Service $690.90 Funding a % of Total Available Funds Administration 20.0% Capital Improvement Programs 30.3% Home Improvement Programs 34.8% Public Service Programs 14.9% Low/Mod Percentage of Current Allocation 80.0% Low/Mod Percentage of Total Allocation 80.0% Funding Differences Prior Year plus Reprogram Funds $0.00 Difference Btwn Requested & Allocation $1.462,016.00 Activities Sidewalk Grinding $22,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $22,000.00 $22,000.00 Wheelchair Ramps $30,000.00 $0.00 SO.OO $0.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 Etiwanda Railway Station $50,000.00 $0.00 SO,OO $0.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 Norton-Fisher/Chaffey-Isle $40,000.00 $0.00 SO.OO $0.00 $40,000.00 $40,000.00 Hellman/Arrow Drainage Improvements $18,000.00 $0.00 SO.OO $0.00 $8,000.00 $8,000.00 Calle Vejar (Construction) $617,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $163,185.00 $163,185.00 Cultural Center - Library Improvements $500,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 ADA Old town Park Improvements $350,00000 $000 SO.OO $0,00 $0.00 $0.00 Subtotal - Capital Improvement $1,627,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $313,185.00 $313,185.00 Home Improvement Program $350,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $350,000,00 $350,000.00 Oldtimers Foundation - Home Maintenance $18,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 Subtotal - Home Improvement $368,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $360,000.00 $360,000.00 Graffiti Removal $22,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $22,000,00 $22,000.00 lFHMB - Fair Housing $20,075.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $12,000.00 $12,000.00 lFHMB - LandlordfTenant $15,000,00 $0.00 $0.00 $0,00 $10,000,00 $10,000.00 Foothill Family Shelter $5,000,00 $0.00 $0,00 $0,00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 House of Ruth $8.634.00 $000 $0.00 $000 $7,600.00 $7,600.00 SOVA $10,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0,00 $7,000,00 $7,000.00 YMCA - Your Own Club $7.500.00 $000 so 00 $000 $5.00000 $5,000.00 YMCA - Senior Transportation $25,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 RC Community Services - Senior Programs $16,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $000 $16,000.00 $16,000.00 Northtown Collaborative $12,000.00 $0.00 SO.OO SO,OO $12,000.00 $12,000.00 RC Library - Back. To Basics $10,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0,00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 Oldtimers Foundation - Senior Nutrition $30,000.00 $0.00 SO,OO $0.00 $8,500.00 $8,500.00 Camp Fire USA $13,400.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $6,700,00 $6,700.00 Project Sister $9,700.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $9,700,00 $9,700.00 Hope Through Housing Foundation $5,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0,00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 Rising Stars of Equestrian Therapy $7,000.00 $0.00 SO,OO $0.00 $3,000,00 $3,000.00 American Red Cross Inland Valley Chapter $15,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Family Services Agency of San Bernardino $25,000.00 $0.00 $0,00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 His Hands Ministry $3,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 IFHMB - Senior Services $8,092.00 $0,00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Legal Aid Society of San Bernardino $7,500.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Olive Branch Counseling Cenler $19,800.00 $0,00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Subtotal-PubUcServlce $294,701.00 SO.OO $0.00 $0.00 $154,500.00 $t54,500.00 1~5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM 2006-2007 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN (JULY 1,2006 TO JUNE 30, 2007) :..-r,.....~ ~"~.....~i.m'L ~ \th "....r L_t . Q;~</A",.. ".~?~~.~ . '_'''''_~~ pH ,r i.:J ;~~if;Q"" " ....,~O ~:i I> ~ 6. , , . ''1 < 01 .~' ~ " 0 " Adopted April 19, 2006 1~0 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2006-2007 Annual Action Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS ApPLICATION FOR FEDERAL ASSISTANCE (HUD-424) ....................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................. 2 RESOURCES AVAILABLE.................................................................................................................... 2 FEDERAL RESOURCES.......................................................................................................... 2 OTHER RESOURCES................................ ............................................................................. 3 LEVERAGING AND MATCHING FUNDS..................................................................................... 3 ACTIVITIES TO BE UNDERTAKEN ........................................................................................................4 AFFORDABLE HOUSING ......................................................................................................... 4 OBJECTIVE 1 - CONSERVATION OF THE EXISTING SINGLE-FAMILY AND MUL TIPLE- FAMILY AFFORDABLE HOUSING STOCK ..................................................................... 4 OBJECTIVE 2 -IMPROYE ACCESS TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOR ALL Low- AND MODERATE-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS, WITH EMPHASIS ON THE PRODUCTION OF LARGER (3+ BEDROOM) RENTAL UNITS .................................................................................. 5 OBJECTIYE 3 - PROVIDE DIRECT RENTER ASSISTANCE TO Low- AND MODERATE- INCOME HOUSEHOLDS IN ORDER TO OBTAIN OR RETAIN PERMANENT HOUSiNG........ 5 OBJECTIYE 4 -INCREASE HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES FOR Low- AND MODERATE- INCOME OWNERSHIP, PARTICULARLY THROUGH HOMEBUYER ASSISTANCE .............. 6 OBJECTIYE 5 - REHABILITATION OF THE EXISTING HOUSING STOCK WITH EMPHASIS ON OWNER-OCCUPIED HOUSING .............................................................................. 8 OBJECTIVE 6 -IMPROVE L1YING CONDITIONS FOR Low- AND MODERATE-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS ......... .................................................................................................. 9 HOMELESS STRATEGIC PLAN ................................................................................................ 9 OBJECTIVE 7 - ASSIST HOMELESS INDIVIDUALS, FAMILIES, AND PERSONS WITH SPECIAL NEEDS, AND THOSE AT-RISK OF HOMELESSNESS...................................... 10 HOMELESS ANNUAL PLAN ................................................................................................... 10 SPECIAL NEEDS..................... ............................................................................................. 11 OBJECTIVE 8 - PROYIDE NECESSARY REHABILITATION SERVICES TO SPECIAL NEEDS POPULATIONS WITH EMPHASIS ON ASSISTING THE ELDERLY AND FRAIL ELDERLY... 11 OBJECTIYE 9 - SUPPORT SERYICE PROYIDERS ASSISTING SPECIAL NEEDS POPULATIONS......................................................................................................... 11 SPECIAL NEEDS ANNUAL PLAN ........................................................................................... 12 NON-HOUSING COMMUNITY DEYELOPMENT NEEDS............................................................. 12 OBJECTIVE 10 - PROVIDE IMPROVEMENTS TO PUBLIC AREAS AND PUBLIC FACILITIES TO ENHANCE LIVING ENVIRONMENTS, IMPROYE THE QUALITY OF LIFE IN Low- AND MODERATE-INCOME NEIGHBORHOODS, AND FOR LOWER INCOME INDIVIDUALS, SENIORS, AND THE HANDiCAPPED........................................................................... 12 OBJECTIYE 11 - ASSIST LOCAL PUBLIC AND NON-PROFIT SERVICE AGENCIES THAT IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF LIFE FOR Low- AND MODERATE-INCOME PERSONS AND THOSE WITH SPECIAL NEEDS .................................................................................. 12 OBJECTIYE 12 - ENSURE ACCESSIBILITY TO ALL PUBLIC FACILITIES AND STRUCTURES.................................................................................................... 15 OBJECTIVE 13 - THE RESTORATION AND PRESERVATION OF PROPERTIES OF SOCIAL VALUE FOR HISTORIC, ARCHITECTURAL, AND AESTHETIC REASONS........................ 15 OBJECTIVE 14 - PROVIDE THE NECESSARY PLANNING AND ADMINISTRATIVE CAPACITY TO IMPLEMENT THE CDBG PROGRAM AND THE CONSOLIDATED PLAN ..... 16 OBJECTIVE 15 - ALLEVIATE PHYSICAL AND RELATED ECONOMIC DISTRESS THROUGH THE STIMULATION OF PRIVATE INVESTMENT AND COMMUNITY REVITALIZATION IN Pagei J~7 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2006-2007 Annual Action Plan IDENTIFIED TARGET NEIGHBORHOODS .................................................................... 17 OBJECTIYE 16 - REVITALIZE AND UPGRADE HOUSING CONDITIONS; PREVENT AND ELIMINATE SLIGHT AND BLIGHTING INFLUENCES; AND ELIMINATE CONDITIONS DETRIMENTAL TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, AND WELFARE.............................. 18 OTHER ACTIONS............................................................................................................................. 18 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT .................................................................................................. 18 AFFIRMATIVELY FURTHERING FAIR HOUSING ...................................................................... 19 OBSTACLES TO MEETING UNDER SERYED NEEDS ............................................................... 22 ACTIONS TO FOSTER AND MAINTAIN AFFORDABLE HOUSING ............................................... 22 ACTIONS TO REMOVE BARRIERS TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING ............................................... 22 ACTIONS TO EVALUATE AND REDUCE LEAD BASED PAINT HAZARDS.................................... 22 ACTIONS TO REDUCE THE NUMBER OF POVERTY LEVEL FAMILIES....................................... 22 ACTIONS TO DEVELOP INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURE AND ENHANCE COORDINATION.............. 22 PUBLIC HOUSING IMPROVEMENTS....................................................................................... 23 MONITORING. .... ... .......... ............ ... ... ... ......... ....... ... ... ...... ........ ... ............... ....... ....... .... ........ 23 CITIZEN PARTICIPATION .................................................................................................................. 23 ApPENDIX "A" - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...........................................................................................A-1 ApPENDIX "B" - SUMMARY OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING 5-YEAR AND 1-YEAR GOALS .......................B-1 ApPENDIX "c" - ATTACHMENTS .....................................................................................................C-1 SUPPORTING MAPS: PROPOSED PROJECTS AND Low/MOD INCOME ..................................C-1 SUPPORTING FORMS: FUNDING SOURCES, CONTINUUM OF CARE: GAPS ANALYSIS, SPECIAL NEEDS/NON-HOMELESS, HOUSING NEEDS, AND COMMUNITY NEEDS .................................C-1 LISTING OF PROPOSED PROJECTS .......................................................... ...........................C-1 CERTIFiCATIONS................................................................................................................ C-1 Pageii I ~?j APPLICATION FOR Version 7/03 FEDERAL ASSISTANCE 2. DATE SUBMITTED Applicant Identifier May 15, 2006 b-06-MC-G6-0556 1. TYPE OF SUBMISSION: 3. DATE RECEIVED BY STATE State Application Identifier Application Pre.apptication o Construction (d Construction 4. DATE RECEIVED BY FEDERAL AGENCY Federal Identifier m Non-Construction o Non-Construction 5. APPLICANT INFORMATION Legal Name: Organizational Unit: City of Rancho Cucamonga Department: Community Development Department Or~anizational DUNS: Division: 00 052970 Planning Division Address: Name and telephone number of person to be contacted on matters Street: involving this application (give area code) 10500 Civic Center Drive Prefix: First Name: Mr. Thomas City: Middle Name Rancho Cucamonga County: Last Name San Bernardino Grahn Stale: Zip Code Suffix: CA 91730 Country: Email: USA tgrahn@ci.rancho-cucamonga.ca.us 6. EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (EIN): Phone Number (give area code) Fax Number (give area code) ~@]-~@J[i]~@]@]@J (909) 477-2750 (909) 477-2847 8. TYPE OF APPLICATION: 7. TYPE OF APPLICANT: (See back of fonn for Application Types) [J New Ia Continuation [] Revision C f Revision, enter appropriate letter(s) in box(es) Other (specify) See back of form for description of letters.) 0 0 Other (specify) 9. NAME OF FEDERAL AGENCY: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 10. CATALOG OF FEDERAL DOMESTIC ASSISTANCE NUMBER: 11. DESCRIPTIVE TITLE OF APPLICANT'S PROJECT: [j]1]-[2] [j] ~ Housing Rehabilitation; Historic Preservation; Handicap, Street, and TITLE (Name 01 Program): Public Facility Improvements; and Public Services (Including: Fair HCOA Housing, Landlord Tenant, Graffiti Removal. Homeless Assistance, 12. AREAS AFFECTED BY PROJECT (Cmes, Counlies, States, etc.): Domestic Viokfnce Assistance, Senior Programs, Youth Programs. and Literacy Programs). City wide program. 13. PROPOSED PROJECT 14. CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS OF: Start Date: I Ending Date: a, Applicant b. Project July 1, 2006 June 30. 2007 26 6 15. ESTIMATED FUNDING: 16.IS APPLICATION SUBJECT TO REVIEW BY STATE EXECUTIVE nRDER 12372 PROCESS? a. Federal ID THIS PREAPPLlCATION/APPLlCATION WAS MADE 1,034,606 a. Yes. AVAILABLE TO THE STATE EXECUTIVE ORDER 12372 b. Applicant PROCESS FOR REVIEW ON c. State DATE: d. Local b. No, IZlI PROGRAM IS NOT COVERED BY E. O. 12372 e. Other Cl OR PROGRAM HAS NOT BEEN SELECTEO BY STATE FOR REVIEW f. Program Income 17. IS THE APPLICANT DELINQUENT ON ANY FEDERAL DEBT? g. TOTAL 1,034,606 o Yes If "Yes~ attach an explanation. lZl No 18. TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, ALL DATA IN THIS APPLlCATION/PREAPPLlCATION ARE TRUE AND CORRECT. THE OCUMENT HAS BEEN DULY AUTHORIZED BY THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE APPLICANT AND THE APPLICANT WILL COMPLY WITH THE TTACHED ASSURANCES IF THE ASSISTANCE IS AWARDED. a. Authorized Renresentative ~fix 1 First Name ~iddle Name r. William Last Name ~uffix Alexander . Title . T~~~phone Number (give area code) Mayor 909 477-2700 Ct, Signature of Authorized Representative e. Date Signed April 19,2006 Previous Edition Usable Authorized for Local Reoroduction Standard Form 424 (Rev.9-2003) Prescribed bv OMB Circular A-1 02 ; g9 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2006-2007 Annual Action Plan INTRODUCTION The Annual Action Plan provides a plan of investment and an outline of activities expected to be undertaken during the 2005-2006 program year. The report identifies local objectives and priority needs identified to implement the primary objective of the Community Development Block Grant (CDSG) program, which is the development of viable urban communities by providing decent housing, suitable living environment, and expanded economic opportunities, principally for low- and moderate-income persons. RESOURCES AYAILABLE . FEDERAL RESOURCES Community Development Block Grant Federal funding available to the City are allocated through the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) CDBG program. During the 2006-2007 program year, the City will receive an entitlement allocation of $ 1,034,606, which is $ 100,002 less than fiscal year 2005-2006. San Bernardino County Housing Authority The San Bernardino County Housing Authority serves as the local housing authority for the region. The Agency currently operates 170 Section 8 housing units and 16 public housing units located within the City. Sources of funds available to City residents through the Housing Authority are primarily limited to Section 8, Comprehensive Grant Improvement, and the Public Housing programs. County of San Bernardino, Department of Economic and Community Development (ECD) The County receives federal funds to implement the HOME Consortium, which the City joined in July 1995. In 1999 the City renewed their commitment to the HOME Consortium by signing a 3-year Cooperation Agreement covering the period from October 1, 1999 to September 30, 2002. The City will be renewed the 3-year agreement to cover the period from October 1, 2002 to September 30, 2005. On March 30, 2005, the City signed a Certificate of Interest to continue with a cooperative agreement for the next 3-year period. The County operates five programs through the HOME Consortium that include the HOME Homeownership Assistance Program (HAP), HOME Tenant-Based Rental Assistance (TSRA) Program, HOME Rental Property Acquisition and Rehabilitation Program, HOME Multifamily Rental Property Rehabilitation/Refinance Program, and the HOME Community Housing Development Organization (CHDO) Program. The County allocation for these programs total $ 4,500,000 and includes funds for program administration. The HAP, TRSA, and Rental Property Acquisition and Rehabilitation programs are discussed as specific activities in the Consolidated Plan. The CHDO Set-Aside program is not identified and therefore warrants further discussion. The CHDO program is funded through a mandatory Set-Aside from the HOME Consortium and provides funds for affordable housing that is developed, sponsored, or owned by non-profits that have been certified as CHDO's. The CHDO program functions as a source of Page 2 19tJ City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2006-2007 Annual Action Plan funding for a variety of projects including new construction and rehabilitation of residential structures. Funds are not targeted to a specific area or project type within the County; however, recipient income cannot exceed 80% of the County medium family income. Funds are available to eligible residents on a first-come first-serve basis through the City's participation in the HOME Consortium, with approximately $ 1,550,000 allocated to the CHDO program. . OTHER RESOURCES City of Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency State law requires redevelopment agencies to set aside at least 20% of tax increment revenue for increasing and improving the community's supply of low- and moderate-income housing. Between July 1, 2005, and June 30, 2010, approximately $ 67,131,198 will be generated by tax increment for affordable housing. The tax increment allocation to the 20 Percent Set-Aside during the reporting period is projected to be $12,849,925. The Agency's tax increment has been pledged against several on-going projects, and therefore, there is little unobligated funding available. In July 1996, the Redevelopment Agency (RDA) approved the sale of tax allocation bonds to provide permanent financing for two community based non-profit organizations, Southern California Housing Development Corporation (SCHDC) and Northtown Housing Development Corporation (NHDC). On September 1, 1996, Tax Allocation Bonds in the amount of $ 37.66 million were sold. Proceeds of the bonds will be allocated in the following manner: o A pledge agreement through the year 2025 was signed with SCHDC where $ 3.9 million will be provided annually for debt services and project reserves. Beginning year 6, if the provision of Redevelopment Law that allows for the acquisition of existing units with Housing Set-Aside funds has been extended beyond its current sunset, this $ 790,000 of the annual pledge will be deposited into a "Future Project Reserves" fund for use in acquiring additional apartment complexes within the Project Area. If a program is not developed, the funds will be available for any RDA housing program. o A pledge agreement through the year 2025 was signed with NHDC where $ 1.5 million was paid to NHDC on June 30, 1996, and again on December 30, 1996. An additional $ 5 million in net bond proceeds were also paid to the NHDC. These bond proceeds will be used to complete a portion of the capital improvement plan for the Northtown neighborhood that includes continuing the development of infill housing on vacant lots, acquisition and rehabilitation of existing absentee-owned housing. The annual pledge amount will be $ 1.4 million through the year 2025. . LEYERAGING AND MATCHING FUNDS The primary source of fund leveraging will occur through RDA 20 Percent Set-Aside funds in public/private partnerships with non-profit housing development corporations such as the NHDC and the SCHDC. Other potential sources for leveraging include HOME funds and Low-Income Housing Tax Credits. Page 3 /ql City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2006-2007 Annual Action Plan ACTIYITIES TO BE UNDERTAKEN . AFFORDABLE HOUSING OBJECTIVE 1: CONSERVATION OF THE EXISTING SINGLE-FAMILY AND MULTIPLE-FAMILY AFFORDABLE HOUSING STOCK. Program 1.1: Acquisition of existing multi-family units to be held for future affordable housing stock. Activity 1.1.1: This activity includes the acquisition of restricted, and previously unrestricted, at-risk units. The SCHDC, with pledge assistance from the RDA 20 Percent Set-Aside funds obtained replacement financing for several complexes within the City. The SCHDC owns and manages the complexes, and the RDA monitors the affordability covenants checking quarterly to ensure units are rented according to the agreement and the occupants comply with established income categories. Lead Agency: The SCHDC, with funding assistance by the City of Rancho Cucamonga RDA. Geographic Location: Activities will primarily occur in the Redevelopment target area, however, units may be acquired citywide. Resources: Sonds issued by the RDA and a loan from the California Housing Finance Authority (CHFA) were used to provide long-term replacement financing for four SCHDC affordable housing complexes. A 1996-97 RDA tax allocation bond issue provided approximately $ 30 million for replacement financing. An annual pledge of $ 3.9 million of Agency Housing funds provides bond debt service and project reserve funds. Accomplishments and Time Frame: There are currently six apartment complexes, containing 1,262 total units with 670 units held as affordable. Monterey Village and Mountainside Apartments were acquired in FY 95-96 and Sycamore Springs and Rancho Verde Apartments were acquired in FY 96-97. During FY 02-03, SCHDC completed the Heritage Pointe Senior Apartments, a 49 unit senior apartment complex, which holds 100% of the units as affordable. During FY 05-06, SCHDC acquired Woodhaven Apartments, which contains 117 units, 100% will be held as affordable. The SCHDC is currently in planning stages of providing an additional 40 units (100% affordable) at Rancho Verde Apartments, which will provide an additional 40 units to the totals below. These additional units will be completed by June 30,2007. Complex Total Units Affordable Units Svcamore Sprinas 240 96 Mountainside Apartments 384 192 MonterevVillaoe Apartments 224 112 Rancho Verde ADartments 248 104 Heritaae Pointe Senior Aoartments 49 49 Woodhaven ADa.rtments 117 117 Total 1,262 670 Page 4 ;((2 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program ?006-2007 Annual Action Plan Program 1.2: Acquisition and rehabilitation of existing single-family homes. Activity 1.2.1 : The NHDC does not anticipate rehabilitating any units during the 2006- 2007 program year. When rehabilitation does occur the NHDC is the owner/developer of the rehabilitated lots, which are purchased with assistance from the RDA. This activity is part of the NHDC's First-Time Home Suyer program where newly constructed and/or rehabilitated single-family homes are available to low- and moderate-income home buyers in the Northtown neighborhood. (See Objective 4, Program 4.3, Activity 4.3.1.) OBJECTIVE 2: Program 2.2: Activity 2.2.1 : IMPROVE ACCESS TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOR ALL LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS, WITH EMPHASIS ON THE PRODUCTION OF LARGER (3+ BEDROOM) RENTAL UNITS. Construction of single-family infill development in low- and moderate-income neighborhoods. The NHDC constructs new homes on infilllots within the Northtown target neighborhood. When lots are available, new homes are made available to families with incomes between 80% and 90% of the area median income. The NHDC is the owner/developer of the infilllots; however, these lots are purchased with assistance from the RDA. This program is also part of the NHDC's First-Time Home Buyer program where newly constructed and/or rehabilitated single-family homes are available to low- and moderate-income home buyers in the Northtown neighborhood. (See Objective 4, Program 4.3, Activity 4.3.1.). Lead Agency: The NHDC. Geographic Location: The Northtown target neighborhood. Resources: The NHDC leveraged RDA 20 Percent Set-Aside funds with subsidies from the Affordable Housing Program and permanent first-mortgages from Home Loan Sank of San Francisco. Accomplishments and Time Frame: The NHDC was not able to obtain any lots for the construction of any new single-family homes, and therefore does not does not plan on the development of any homes during the program year. OBJECTIVE 3: Program 3.1: Activity 3.1.1 : PROVIDE DIRECT RENTER ASSISTANCE TO LOW- AND MODERATE. INCOME HOUSEHOLDS IN ORDER TO OBTAIN OR RETAIN PERMANENT HOUSING. Support applications by the Housing Authority of San Bernardino County for future Section 8 and public housing assistance. The Housing Authority routinely requests assistance from the City when applying for Section 8 Housing Certificates and Vouchers for public Page 5 /93 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2006-2007 Annual Action Plan housing assistance. The City will continue to support these applications. The agency currently operates 6,257 Section 8 units of which 170 are located within the City. The agency also operates 16 public housing units and rents them to qualified households at affordable rates. Lead Agency: County of San Bernardino, Housing Authority. Geographic Location: These programs are available citywide. Resources: Federal housing funds. Accomplishments and Time Frame: Annually support 16 public housing and 170 Section 8 applications. Program 3.2: Activity 3.2.1 : Participate in the HOME Consortium Tenant-Based Rental Assistance (TBRA) program. The Tenant-Based Rental Assistance (TBRA) program is offered through the HOME Consortium and is available to eligible residents. The program provides both a monthly rent subsidy for very low-income special needs households and security deposit assistance to households receiving a monthly rental subsidy from the San Bernardino County Housing Authority. The County targets monthly rental assistance to eligible households that include a disabled family member, and they place a priority on providing security deposit assistance to families experiencing "temporary" housing situations where the temporary housing or shelter is either not suitable or not available as permanent housing. Lead Agency: County of San Bernardino, ECD, HOME Consortium. Geographic Location: Available to eligible residents citywide. Resources: HOME funds are available on a first-come first-serve basis through the City's participation in the County HOME Consortium, with approximately $ 1,000,000 allocated to this program. This includes $ 400,000 in monthly rental assistance and $ 600,000 in security deposit assistance. Accomplishments and Time Frame: The City will work with the HOME Consortium to publicize this program so that six households could receive assistance by June 30, 2007. OBJECTIVE 4: Program 4.1: Activity 4.1.1 : INCREASE HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES FOR LOW- AND MODERATE- INCOME HOME OWNERSHIP, PARTICULARLY THROUGH HOMEBUYER ASSISTANCE. Administer a City sponsored Home Buyer Program. The RDA administers a Home Buyer program using down payment assistance loans. The loan provides up to a maximum of $ 80,000, as a silent second loan. The loan is forgiven if the buyer remains in the unit for 45 years. Page 6 /91 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2006.2007 Annual Action Plan Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga RDA. Geographic Location: This program is available to eligible residents citywide. Resources: RDA Set-Aside funds: $ 1,000,000. Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2007, assist 10 homebuyers. Program 4.2: Activity 4.2.1 : Participate in the HOME Consortium Homeownership Assistance Program (HAP). The HAP assists households earning less than 80% of the median family income in the purchase of a home. The HAP is a silent second trust deed program to assist low-income persons in becoming homeowners. Lead Agency: County of San Bernardino, ECD, HOME Consortium. Geographic Location: This program is available to eligible residents citywide. Resources: HOME funds are available on a first-come first-serve basis through the City's participation in the County HOME Consortium, with approximately $ 1,000,000 allocated to this program. Accomplishments and Time Frame: The City will work with the HOME Consortium to publicize this program so that four households could receive assistance by June 30, 2007. Program 4.3: Activity 4.3.1 : Assist the NHDC First-Time Home Buyer Program. The NHDC's First Time Home Buyer Program proYides newly constructed and/or rehabilitated single-family homes to low- and moderate-income homebuyers in the Northtown neighborhood. NHDC plans to complete the construction of five new homes (see Affordable Housing, Objective 2, Program 2.2, Activity 2.2.1), as well as the rehabilitation of one home (see Affordable Housing, Objective 1, Program 1.2, Activity 1.2.1) to provide the homes available for this program. When lots are available, newly constructed homes are typically sold to income-eligible homebuyers earning between 80% and 90% of the area median family income. When rehabilitated homes are utilized (see Affordable Housing, Objective 1, Program 1.2, Activity 1.2.1) the rehabilitated homes are leased for a two-year period at affordable rents to families earning up to 60% of the area median family income. At the end of the two year lease period, the tenant will be offered a purchase option if they have demonstrated the ability to properly maintain and pay for the home and can arrange financing for an affordable first mortgage. The NHDC plans on the rehabilitation of one unit during the program year. Lead Agency: The NHDC. Geographic Location: The Northtown target neighborhood. Page 7 195 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2006-2007 Annual Action Plan Resources: The NHDC received a pledge amount from the RDA that they are able to use accordingly to meet the goals of their affordable housing program. Accomplishments and Time Frame: The NHDC was not able to obtain existing units for rehabilitation, or lots for new construction, under this program; therefore, there are no units planned to be leased or sold during the program year. OBJECTIVE 5: Program 5.1 : Activity 5.1.1: REHABILITATION OF THE EXISTING HOUSING STOCK WITH EMPHASIS ON OWNER-OCCUPIED HOUSING. Provide moderate rehabilitation of owner occupied, single-family and mobile homes for extremely low-, low-, and moderate-income homeowners. The City has an existing moderate rehabilitation Home Improvement Program available to eligible owner-occupied households, those earning less than 80% of the area median family income. The program offers deferred payment loans of up to $ 30,000 and grants of up to $ 7,500, including emergency repair grants. The City runs this as a full service program and not only lends the money, but secures contractors, oversees the work, and maintains administration of the grants and loans rather than farming this work out to the bank or homeowner. While this method requires additional staff time, it is done to provide a high level of customer service and ensure both consistent and efficient results. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. Geographic Location: This program is available to eligible residents citywide. Resources: CDBG funds: $ 350,000. Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2007, assist 40 households with incomes below 80% of the area median family income. Program 5.2: Activity 5.2.1 : Participate in the HOME Consortium Rental Property Acquisition and Rehabilitation Program. This program provides a three (3) percent interest loan to acquire and/or rehabilitate existing rental property that will then be made available to qualifying tenants at affordable rents for a specified period. Funds may be used for moderate rehabilitation efforts, with a maximum allowed of up to $ 25,000 per unit. The HOME assisted units will be subject to specific rent limits, and be available to low- and very-low income residents. This program also provides funding for the refinancing and rehabilitation of multi-family units. Lead Agency: County of San Bernardino, ECD, HOME Consortium. Geographic Location: This program is available to eligible residents citywide. Resources: HOME funds are available on a first-come first-serve basis through the City's Page 8 /q& City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2006-2007 Annual Action Plan participation in the County HOME Consortium, with approximately $ 250,000 allocated to this program. Accomplishments and Time Frame: No known units are proposed for assistance during the 2006-2007 program year. The City will work with the HOME Consortium to publicize this program in Rancho Cucamonga. Program 5.3: Activity 5.3.1 : Participate in the HOME Consortium Multifamily Rental Property Rehabilitation/Refinance Program. Provides three (3) percent interest loans to nonprofit and for-profit owners of affordable multifamily rental housing (five (5) or more units) primarily for the rehabilitation of their residential rental property, which will then be made available to qualifying tenants at affordable rents for a specific period. Lead Agency: County of San Bernardino, ECD, HOME Consortium. Geographic Location: This program is available to eligible residents citywide. Resources: HOME funds are available on a first-come first-serve basis through the City's participation in the County HOME Consortium, with approximately $ 250,000 allocated to this program. Accomplishments and Time Frame: No known units are proposed for assistance during the 2006-2007 program year. The City will work with the HOME Consortium to publicize this program in Rancho Cucamonga. OBJECTIVE 6: Program 6.1 : Activity 6.1.1 : IMPROVE LIVING CONDITIONS FOR LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS. Support applications of the Housing Authority for their Annual Comprehensive Grant to improve living conditions for public housing residents. Each year the City has certified consistency of the Housing Authority's Comprehensive Grant program with the Consolidated Plan. The City will continue to do so for the Comprehensive Plan. Lead Agency: Housing Authority of San Bernardino County. Geographic Location: This program will benefit residents citywide. Resources: Federal housing funds. Accomplishments and Time Frame: Annually support 16 public housing applications. . HOMELESS STRATEGIC PLAN OBJECTIVE 7: ASSIST HOMELESS INDIVIDUALS, FAMILIES, AND PERSONS WITH Page 9 /91 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2006-2007 Annual Action Plan SPECIAL NEEDS, AND THOSE AT-RISK OF HOMELESSNESS. Program 7.1: Continue to support of local homeless facilities and services. Activity 7.1.1: The City supports a variety of organizations that provide immediate assistance, advocacy, and short-term shelter to homeless individuals and families. The City will continue to address priority needs, and will continue to evaluate the provision of transitional shelter assistance. These agencies include: Foothill Family Shelter: Foothill Family Shelter operates a 90-day transitional shelter for homeless families with children. Support services are provided to enable families to obtain independence and permanent housing. They are located at 1501 West Ninth Street, Suite D, and at 230, 238, and 294 North San Antonio Avenue in Upland, CA 91786. House of Ruth: House of Ruth provides shelter, programs, education, and opportunities for safe, self-sufficient, healthy living for battered women and their children who are at-risk of homelessness. Services provided include 24-hour emergency safe shelter for up to 30 days, 24- hour crisis intervention hotline, 24-hour emergency transportation, outreach offices, and children programs. House of Ruth is located in Claremont, at P.O. Box 457, Claremont, CA 91711. Inland Valley Council of Churches - West End Hunqer Proqram (SOVA): SOVA offers a 5-day food supply (15 meals) for all members of a household. SOVA helps families maintain their health and avoid homelessness by providing emergency food assistance and support services. The PVCC offers the West End Hunger Program from offices located at 635 South Taylor Avenue, Ontario, CA 91761. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. Geographic Location: The benefits of this program occur citywide. Resources: CDBG funds: o Foothill Family Shelter: o House of Ruth: o SOV A: $ 5,000. $ 7,600. $ 7,000. Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2007, assist the following: o Foothill Family Shelter - 10 families. o House of Ruth - 1,600 persons. o SOV A - 1,280 persons. . HOMELESS ANNUAL PLAN The City's goal is to develop a comprehensive homeless assistance plan that provides a continuum of care with the purpose of ultimately assisting individuals in obtaining and retaining permanent housing. As the first priority in the plan, the City intends to continue funding those agencies that are able to provide the first line of defense in providing outreach and advocacy in assisting individuals and families who are homeless or at-risk of homelessness. These activities include the support of emergency shelter, shelter vouchers, food distribution, advocacy, and referral services. The City will continue to fund landlord/tenant activities as a means of assisting those who are at-risk of homelessness in keeping their homes. Additional assistance will be Page 10 I qS City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2006-2007 Annual Action Plan encouraged for those agencies that provide longer-term transitional shelter and assist in the transition to permanent housing opportunities. . SPECIAL NEEDS OBJECTIVE 8: Program 8.1: Activity 8.1.1 : PROVIDE NECESSARY REHABILITATION SERVICES TO SPECIAL NEEDS POPULATIONS WITH EMPHASIS ON ASSISTING THE ELDERLY AND FRAIL ELDERLY. Provide minor and emergency rehabilitation services to eligible households with emphasis on assistance to low- and moderate- income seniors. This program will complement the City's Home Improvement Program by providing minor rehabilitation and emergency assistance to low- and moderate-income residents and senior citizen households whose income falls below 80% of the area median family income. Permitted home repairs include minor plumbing, electrical, carpentry, and roof repairs. Residents who are owner occupants are eligible to receive two visits, up to $ 250 per visit, and in emergencies, the allowance of a one-time material charge for up to $ 500. The agency is located at 8572 Sierra Avenue, Fontana, CA 92335. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. Geographic Location: This program is available to eligible residents citywide. Resources: CDBG funds: $10,000. Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2007, Oldtimers Foundation will assist 60 low- and moderate-income households. OBJECTIVE 9: Program 9.1 : Activity 9.1.1 : SUPPORT SERVICE PROVIDERS ASSISTING SPECIAL NEEDS POPULATIONS. Support special need services in areas where there are significant under-served needs. Develop and enhance senior citizen classes and activities in the focus areas of physical fitness, recreational and educational development, mental health, and emotional well-being. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Services Department. Geographic Location: Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center, 11200 Base Line Road. Resources: CDBG funds: $16,000. Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2007, to have assisted 550 persons through these activities. Page 11 191 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2006-2007 Annual Action Plan . SPECIAL NEEDS ANNUAL PLAN Objectives 8 and 9, as stated above, identify actions the City intends to take over the next program year to address the needs of persons who are not homeless, but have special needs. . NON-HoUSING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NEEDS OBJECTIVE 10: PROVIDE IMPROVEMENTS TO PUBLIC AREAS AND PUBLIC FACILITIES TO ENHANCE LIVING ENVIRONMENTS, IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF LIFE IN LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME NEIGHBORHOODS, AND FOR LOWER INCOME INDIVIDUALS, SENIORS, AND THE HANDICAPPED. Program 10.1: Complete all necessary infrastructure and sidewalk improvements in qualified target areas. Activity 10.1.1: The City will fund the following public improvement projects: o Calle Veiar from Avenida Leon to Hellman Avenue, and Avenida Leon from Arrow Route to Calle Veiar: The construction of street improvements to include: removal of the existing pavement, construct new pavement over aggregate base, install streetlights, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, ramps for disabled, and street trees. When completed, the project will facilitate better drainage of the street and right-of-way. Because insufficient funds are available to currently complete this project, the identified funds will be banked for the future completion of these street improvements. o Hellman/Arrow Drainaqe Improvements: The repair of existing under capacity drainage improvements, to increase capacity and allow for removal of debris, thereby reducing the incidence of nuisance water in the street intersection. o Sidewalk Grindino and Replacement in Identified Tarqet Neiqhborhoods: Involves the grinding, repair, or replacement of sidewalks that are displaced and/or inaccessible. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Division. Geographic Location: Calle Vejar Street Improvements and Hellman/Arrow Drainage Improvements will be carried out in CT 21, BG 2. Sidewalk Grinding efforts may be carried out in all eligible neighborhoods including CT 21, BG 2, 3, 6, & 7. Resources: CDBG funds: o Calle Vejar o Hellman Arrow Drainage Imp. o Sidewalk Grinding: $ 163,185. $ 8,000. $ 22,000. Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2007, complete the Hellman/Arrow Drainage Improvements and replace approximately 3,960 square feet of sidewalk. OBJECTIVE 11: ASSIST LOCAL PUBLIC AND NON-PROFIT SERVICE AGENCIES THAT IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF LIFE FOR LOW- AND MODERATE- INCOME PERSONS AND THOSE WITH SPECIAL NEEDS. Page 12 261) City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2006-2007 Annual Action Plan Program 11.1: Assist public service agencies that support groups in the highest priority categories including: fair housing counseling, landlord- tenant mediation, homeless and food assistance, emergency shelters, domestic violence shelters, and senior, youth-at-risk, and literacy programs. Activity 11.1.1: The City will continue to fund public service agencies that include: Fair Housinq: Fair Housing services that include education, counseling, mediation, and legal referral. Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board is located at 60 West 9'h Street, Upland, CA 91786. Landlord Tenant Mediation: Landlord/Tenant dispute mediation services are provided by Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board. House of Ruth: House of Ruth provides shelter, programs, education, and opportunities for safe, self-sufficient, healthy living for battered women and their children who are at-risk of homelessness. Services provided include 24-hour emergency safe shelter (up to 30 days), 24- hour crisis intervention hotline, 24-hour emergency transportation, outreach offices, and children programs. House of Ruth is located in Claremont, at P.O. Box 457, Claremont, CA 91711. Inland Valley Council of Churches - West End Hunoer Proqram (SOVA): SOVA offers a 5-day food supply (15 meals) for all members of a household. SOVA helps families maintain their health and avoid homelessness by providing emergency food assistance and support services. SOVA is located at 635 South Taylor Avenue, Ontario, CA 91761. YMCA - Your Own Club: This program is targeted to the Northtown neighborhood within CT 21, BG 6 & 7. YOC is designed to provide at-risk middle school aged youth with fun, educationally enriching and challenging value-based after school alternatives in a safe and enjoyable environment. Rancho Cucamonga Family YMCA, a branch of the West End YMCA, is currently located at 11200 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. Oldtimers Foundation - Senior Nutrition: The nutrition program is run from the Senior Center in which 22,500 hot meals would be provided at the RC Senior Center and 16,250 meals prepared for home delivery. Oldtimers Foundation is located at 8572 Sierra Avenue, Fontana, CA 92335. Rancho Cucamonqa Public Library - Back To Basics: The Back to Basic program trains volunteer tutors to work with 7 to 12-year old children identified by school personnel as at-risk (challenged economically and educationally) and who are reading and writing below their grade levels. The Rancho Cucamonga Public Library is located at 7368 Archibald Avenue, and in August 2006, it will relocate to the Rancho Cucamonga Cultural Center located at 11505 Cultural Center Drive. YMCA - Senior Transportation: Provide senior citizens transportation to and from the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center, as well as local grocery shopping. The program is provided by Rancho Cucamonga Family YMCA, a branch of the West End YMCA. Camp Fire USA: The program provides a 5-day resident camp session to learn responsibility, develop skills, and gain confidence while building independence and self-reliance. The camp session is run at Camp Nawakwa, located in the Barton Flats recreation area of the San Bernardino Mountains. Camp Fire USA is located at 4959 Palo Verde Street, Suite 20BC, Page 13 26/ City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2006-2007 Annual Action Plan Montclair, CA 91763. Proiect Sister: Project Sister provides sexual assault and violence prevention by working with teens addressing date rape, sexual harassment, and personal safety awareness, and working with seniors, who are vulnerable sexual assault, robbery, burglary, and financial exploitation. Project Sister is located at P.O. Box 1390, Claremont, CA 91711. Rancho CucamonQa Community Services Department - Northtown Collaborative: The Northtown Collaborative is a community (youth and adult) prevention recreation/human services program provides essential human service programs as well as traditional recreational classes and activities. The program is conducted through a joint use agreement with the Cucamonga Middle School and NHDC. The Community Services Department is located at Rancho Cucamonga City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. Hope ThrouQh Housinq Foundation: Hope Through Housing provides opportunities in career development, education, and jobs, by empowering participants with current technology. Hope's parent organization is SCHDC, which operates the apartment complexes identified in Activity 1.1.1. The program will focus on the residents of Rancho Verde Village, Monterey Village, Sycamore Springs, Mountainside Apartments, and their surrounding neighborhoods. Hope Through Housing will operate out of Rancho Verde Village apartments, 8837 Grove Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. Risinq Stars of Equestrian Therapy (RSET): Provides therapeutic, recreational, and instructional horse riding to persons of all ages, with the primary emphasis on those with physical and mental disabilities. The program includes therapeutic exercise, development of fine motor skills, auditory commands, and equine husbandry. RSET is located at 8401 Bella Vista, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. Geographic Location: The benefits of this program occur citywide. Resources: CDBG funds: 0 Fair Housing: $ 12,000. 0 Landlord/Tenant Mediation: $ 10,000. 0 House of Ruth: $ 7,600. 0 SOVA: $ 7,000. 0 YMCA - YOC: $ 5,000. 0 Senior Nutrition: $ 8,500. 0 Back To Basics: $10,000. 0 YMCA - Senior Transportation: $ 15,000. 0 Camp Fire USA: $ 6,700. 0 Project Sister: $ 9,700. 0 Northtown Collaborative $16,000. 0 Hope Through Housing $ 5,000. 0 RSET $ 3,000. Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2006, assist the following: o Fair Housing - 388 persons. o Landlord/Tenant - 228 households. o House of Ruth - 1,600 persons. Page 14 1-1J2 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2006-2007 Annuaf Action Plan o SOY A - 1,258 persons. o YMCA - YOC - 40 youth. o Senior Nutrition - 570 seniors. o Back To Basics -132 persons. o YMCA - Senior Transportation - 3,700 seniors. o Camp Fire USA - 20 youth. o Project Sister - 980 persons. o Northtown Collaborative - 3,200 persons. o Hope Through Housing - 145 persons. o RSET - 40 persons. OBJECTIVE 12: Program 12.1: Activity 12.1.1: ENSURE ACCESSIBILITY TO ALL PUBLIC FACILITIES AND STRUCTURES. Installation of handicap wheelchair ramps at all curb returns. This program involves the retrofitting of existing curbs to accommodate disabled individuals. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Division. Geographic Location: The benefits of this program occur citywide. Resources: CDBG funds: $ 30,000. Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2007, provide approximately 2,880 square feet of curbing for handicap ramps. OBJECTIVE 13: Program 13.1: Activity 13.1.1: THE RESTORATION AND PRESERVATION OF PROPERTIES OF SOCIAL VALUE FOR HISTORIC, ARCHITECTURAL, AND AESTHETIC REASONS. The rehabilitation of significant historic structures, with primary emphasis on residential assistance. The preservation and historic restoration of the Etiwanda Railway Station. The mission of this activity is to preserve the station through renovation for adaptive reuse as a museum and trailhead for the Pacific Electric Inland Trail, a 21-mile long regional trail. It is anticipated that this activity will be a multi-year program, requiring additional CDBG funds in future program years. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. Geographic Location: The Etiwanda Railway Station is located at 7089 Etiwanda Avenue. Resources: CDBG funds: $ 50,000. Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2007, assist in the preparation of design studies, planning and administrative activities, and construction activities for the restoration and preservation of this historic property. Page 15 2tJ3 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2006-2007 Annual Action Plan Activity 13.1.2: The preservation and historic restoration of the Chaffey-Isle House and the Norton-Fisher House. Chaffey-Isle House: Proposed activities will include selective demolition and modifications to secure the structure from the environment and halt the physical effects of deterioration on the structure's exterior. Historic restoration will include: rehabilitation, framing, repairing exterior siding, painting, dry walling, plumbing, and electrical. This activity will provide an additional $ 25,000 towards the preservation and historic restoration of this structure. This is a multi-year program and will be completed through a cooperative effort between the City and the Etiwanda Historical Society. Norton-Fisher House: The proposed preservation and historic restoration of this structure was completed in the 2005-2006 program year; however ongoing maintenance of the structure is necessary. This activity will provide up to $ 15,000 for painting the exterior of the structure. This is a multi-year program and will be completed through a cooperative effort between the City and the Etiwanda Historical Society. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. Geographic Location: The Chaffey-Isle House is located at 7086 Etiwanda Avenue and the Norton-Fisher House is located at 7165 Etiwanda Avenue. Resources: CDBG funds: $ 40,000. Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2007, complete rehabilitation and preservation efforts at both the Chaffey-Isle House and the Norton-Fisher House. OBJECTIVE 14: PROVIDE THE NECESSARY PLANNING AND ADMINISTRATIVE CAPACITY TO IMPLEMENT THE CDBG PROGRAM AND THE CONSOLIDATED PLAN. Program 14.1: Provide for the necessary planning and administrative activities of the CDBG program. Activity 14.1.1 : Includes administration of the CDBG program, the completion of program applications and performance reports, research and analysis, target area studies, historic preservation evaluations, and housing documents. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. Geographic Location: The benefits of this program occur citywide. Resources: CDBG funds: $ 206,921. Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2007, complete all administrative and program management oversight to ensure efficient and effective use of CDBG funds. Page 16 ;2tJL/ City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2006-2007 Annual Action Plan OBJECTIVE 15: ALLEVIATE PHYSICAL AND RELATED ECONOMIC DISTRESS THROUGH THE STIMULATION OF PRIVATE INVESTMENT AND COMMUNITY REVITALIZATION IN IDENTIFIED TARGET NEIGHBORHOODS. Program 15.1: Support housing and Community Development activities that stimulate economic development. Activity 15.1.1: Review and evaluation of Foothill Boulevard. Foothill Boulevard, west of Haven Avenue is older with mixed uses and appears to be reaching stages of economic distress, while the area east of Haven Avenue has primarily new development and vacant land. The concern is with revitalization of the older areas and planning land use to ensure effective and balanced growth along Foothill Boulevard. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. Geographic Location: Approximately six miles from Grove Avenue to East Avenue. Resources: City General Fund. Accomplishments and Time Frame: On January 16, 2002, the City Council adopted the Foothill Boulevard/Historic Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan. The City's Foothill Boulevard and Economic Task Force reviewed existing Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan policies and developed standards for softscape improvements that will occur within the street right-of-way. These improvements will include signage, street furniture, landscaping, etc, to establish a unified street theme. The Visual Improvement Plan will be implemented by private development as vacant properties fronting along Foothill Boulevard develop, and through public improvements where the street frontage is currently improved. The purpose of the Visual Improvement Plan is to develop a design specification plan that will set forth design concepts for the streetscape improvements within the public rights-of-way and entry areas along the entire length of Foothill Boulevard. The plan will help guide a balanced and unified pattern of streetscape for both public and private development. By drawing upon the existing positive improvements and developing a set of unique and unifying historic elements, this plan will ensure that Foothill Boulevard will be an exciting reflection of the historic Route 66 as well as a historic Rancho Cucamonga. A variety of improvements have been installed along Foothill Boulevard, in the vicinity of the Victoria Gardens mall; however, much of the Visual Improvement Plan has not yet been implemented. Through June 30, 2007, continue analysis and implementation of the Foothill Boulevard/Historic Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan. Page 17 20S City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2006-2007 Annual Action Plan OBJECTIVE 16: Program 16.1: Activity 16.1.1 : REVITALIZE AND UPGRADE HOUSING CONDITIONS; PREVENT AND ELIMINATE BLIGHT AND BLIGHTING INFLUENCES; AND ELIMINATE CONDITIONS DETRIMENTAL TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, AND WELFARE. Continue improvements to residential energy efficiency, lead-based paint hazard reduction, and code enforcement through the City's Home Improvement Program. The City currently funds a Home Improvement Program in which, through the course of that activity, the rehabilitation improvements mentioned previously would be completed. A separate activity will not be developed. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. Geographic Location: The benefits of this program occur citywide. Resources: CDBG funds. Accomplishments and Time Frame: Activity accomplishments occur through the Home Improvement Program. (See Objective 5, Program 5.1, Activity 5.1.1.). Program 16.2: Activity 16.2.1 : Continue funding the Graffiti Removal Program. City crews operate in lower income target neighborhoods to remove incidents of graffiti. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Division. Geographic Location: Available in all eligible target neighborhoods including CT 21, BG 2, 3, 6, & 7. Resources: CDBG funds: $ 22,000. Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2007, remove approximately 15,000 square feet of graffiti. OTHER ACTIONS . ECONOMIC DEYELOPMENT The RDA Implementation Plan includes a section on "Commercial and Industrial Economic Enhancement Programs." The objective of that program is to strengthen the economic environment of the commercial/Industrial sector of the Redevelopment Project Area. This is accomplished through a variety of programs designed to address the needs of Rancho Cucamonga's existing businesses, to attract new businesses to the City, and provide long-term employment to strengthen and compliment the economy of the City. Economic development goals focus on job creation, improving the quality of life to residents and businesses, increasing the City's tax base, and providing opportunities for public and private partnerships, including private investment in the community. Economic development Page 18 ;2 () to City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2006-2007 Annual Action Plan activities focus on two basic efforts: business retention and business attraction. Currently, the RDA has successfully implemented a variety of marketing and promotion strategies suggested in the strategic plan that have leveraged the community's attributes as well as establishing a positive business related image. Through a comprehensive plan of advertisement campaigns, direct mail of newsletters, site selection information, trade shows, publishing editorials, press releases, and Internet web page, the City has managed to receive local, regional, and even national recognition. Despite this success and recognition, the RDA continues to work to attract businesses that fit the general business environment of the City and achieve a greater presence in the area. The City will continue with these economic development efforts during the 2005- 2006 program year. The RDA's marketing and promotion efforts have significantly affected employment, expansion, and the local tax base. From 1994-2001, more that 80 companies expanded and/or relocated creating more than 5,300 new jobs because of the Agency's marketing and promotion efforts. Although the City's success in economic development is not a direct result of the Agency's marketing and promotional efforts, the Agency has managed to facilitate that grow1h. Apart from the specifics of the Economic Development strategy, the Agency assists companies through participation in the following programs. The Inland Empire Small Business Development Center (SBDC), which offers a variety of resources to improve business operation including, business consulting, seminars and workshops, information resources, procurement assistance, environmental assistance, and a variety of other programs. The results of the SBDC during the past year were outstanding. Over 179 local businesses were assisted, 244 new jobs were created, and many other jobs have been retained. The SBDC has also assisted in securing $ 1.5 million in new financing for small businesses. . AFFIRMATIYELY FURTHERING FAIR HOUSING In 1984, the City began contracting with the Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board (IFHMB) to provide for the education and enforcement of state and federal housing laws for all residents who request assistance. The IFHMB provides public education, mediation, counseling, testing, and legal referral services to promote fair housing. Having the IFHMB administer the Fair Housing Program assures that there are no impediments to fair housing choices. Fair Housing education is provided as a major component of the program with a goal of providing the knowledge of what is Fair Housing to all partners of the housing industry. Fair Housing outreach is provided through radio programming, mass media, brochures, and the IFHMB web site (http://hometown.aol.com/inmedbd/index.html). Enforcement is provided through the process of mediation through the IFHMB, or a related enforcement agency. And finally, Fair Housing testing is used as a tool to gather evidence of discrimination. The Fair Housing program attempts to accomplish the primary objectives of the City's Fair Housing Impediments Analysis by providing for the education, counseling, mediation, testing, and legal referral of Fair Housing issues within the community. In May 1996, the City completed a five-year Fair Housing Analysis of Impediments (AI). The City contracted with Cotton/Bridges/Associates to update the AI, which was adopted by the City Council on December 4, 2002. While the AI identifies a number of potential issues, certain issues are beyond the ability of a local jurisdiction to address, such as those related to lending practices. The actions established at implementation of the AI represent those that can be addressed by the City. Page 19 2tJ 7 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2006-2007 Annual Action Plan Expandina Affordable Housina Opportunities Housing affordability alone is not necessarily a fair housing issue. However, when housing affordability issues interact with other factors covered under the fair housing laws, such as household type, composition, and race/ethnicity, fair housing concerns may arise. Moreover, the fair housing equation has two sides. One the one side is the availability of a range of housing choices and on the other side is equal access to those choices. Therefore, a community must ensure that it has a range of housing choices to meet the various needs of all income segments in the community. Action 1: The City will continue to provide homeownership opportunities in the community by promoting the First-Time Homebuyer Program. The City will focus outreach efforts towards lower income households, particularly to Black, Hispanic, and Asian households, since they have more difficulty obtaining financing. Specifically the City will provide advertisements and workshops in both Spanish and English to inform residents about this program. Implementation of this action is on-going. Action 2: The City will continue to facilitate the development of housing for all income groups within the community. The City will focus on facilitating affordable housing development through a combination of financial and regulatory assistance. Specifically, the City will work to provide affordable housing throughout the community, avoiding an over- impaction of specific neighborhoods. Implementation of this action is on-going. Action 3: The City will develop a monitoring system of the RDA's lending practices for the First Time Homebuyer Program, as this program is not subject to HMDA. Rehabilitation Assistance Action 4: The City will continue to provide rehabilitation assistance for owner-occupied and investor-owned single-family housing in the community. Existing programs include the Home Improvement Grant, Deferred Payment Loan Program, and the Emergency Home Improvement Grant. The City will ensure that information about these programs be provided in the City's brochures, advertisements, and website in both English and Spanish. Implementation of this action is on-going. Action 5: The City will ensure that Spanish speaking staff is available to assist residents in the City regarding code enforcement, housing rehabilitation, and other housing services. Implementation of this action is on-going. Action 6: The City will continue to rehabilitate substandard multi-family housing in the community. Implementation of this action is on-going. Access to Information Action 7: The City will work to expand its website to provide additional links to housing services and resources, such as a link to the fair housing service provider and a link to the Fannie Mae Foundation which offers free guides and resources for first-time home buyers in both English and Spanish. Implementation of this action is on-going. Page 20 2~~ City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2006-2007 Annual Action Plan Public Policies and Proqrams Action 8: The City will provide developers with federal fair housing guide information regarding accessibility requirements as part of the land use entitlement process. In addition, the City may consider incorporating accessibility compliance as part of the entitlement process. Action 9: The City will continue to pursue affordable housing development programs identified in the 2000-2004 Housing Element. To the extent feasible, the City will facilitate the development of housing affordable to lower and moderate-income households according to the Regional Housing Needs Allocation identified in the Housing Element. Outreach to Lenders Action 10: The City will work with local lenders and government institutions to provide outreach to lower income residents about government-backed financing. The City will encourage local lenders to provide information in both English and Spanish. Implementation of this action is on-going. Action 11: The City will encourage lenders, particularly local lenders, to hold home buying workshops in Rancho Cucamonga by local lending institutions. These workshops should be held in both English and Spanish. Implementation of this action is on-going as workshops are conducted on an annual basis. Action 12: The City will explore regional effort to study predatory lending issues and support state and federal initiatives to address predatory lending practices. Discuss with the fair housing service provider a regional study of predatory lending and ongoing support of anti-predatory lending initiatives. Fair Housinq Services Action 13: The fair housing service provider will continue to conduct fair housing workshops for residents, apartment owners, and property managers. The City will encourage the fair housing service provider to coordinate with the real estate associations regarding fair housing training. Implementation of this action is on-going by providing annual training opportunities. HMDA Monitorinq Action 14: The fair housing service provider will monitor complaints regarding unfair lending, and assess lending patterns using the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act Data (HMDA) and other data sources. The City continues to monitor HMDA and other data on an annual basis. Action 15: The City will work with the fair housing service provider to ensure that an increased number of fair housing tests be performed in the City. Testing will be conducted periodically. Page 21 ;2 tJ9 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2006-2007 Annual Aclion Plan . OBSTACLES TO MEETING UNDER-SERVED NEEDS The primary obstacle identified toward meeting under-served needs is a lack of available resources. This obstacle is and will continue to be an issue. The best way to address this matter is to combine efforts and resources and tap new funding sources. The City is striving to form public/private partnerships as well as seeking out new sources of funding, such as HOME funds to better leverage available funding. . ACTIONS TO FOSTER AND MAINTAIN AFFORDABLE HOUSING A majority of the objectives and actions identified as part of this Annual Action Plan are specifically aimed at increasing and maintaining the City's existing affordable housing stock. Activities such as new construction, conservation of at-risk units, and preservation of existing units are all striving to increase the affordable housing stock. . ACTIONS TO REMOYE BARRIERS TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING There were no significant barriers to affordable housing identified that would need to be revised or amended. All regulations and policies currently in-place are necessary in order to maintain the public health, safety, and welfare. . ACTIONS TO EYALUATE AND REDUCE LEAD-BASED PAINT HAZARDS In conjunction with the Home Improvement Program, the City will continue to implement federal requirements concerning lead-based paint reductions. HUD requires that for any program utilizing CDBG funds, all owners, and/or tenants be notified in writing about the dangers of lead-based paint. Units constructed prior to 1978, which are occupied by children under the age of seven, are inspected for defective paint surfaces. If a child residing in the home has an elevated blood lead level, then defective chewable surfaces will be treated and lead abated. It is also recommended that housing rehabilitation efforts carried out by the RDA also follow the same guidelines. . ACTIONS TO REDUCE THE NUMBER OF POYERTY LEYEL FAMILIES The City has relatively little control over the many factors that may affect the determination of an individual's income level. The primary activity that may be utiiized by the City is the support of public service agencies that incorporate job training and life development skills into their programs, which includes most of the agencies currently receiving CDBG funding. Most of the activities funded by the City, particularly those related to non-housing community development, act indirectly to increase economic development in the City. The City, through its CDSG contract activities, complies with Section 3 requirements encouraging the employment of local low-income individuals. From a housing perspective, all of the priorities, objectives, and programs aimed at increasing affordable housing also increase the stock of housing available to those in the lowest income categories. . ACTIONS TO DEYELOP INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURE AND ENHANCE COORDINATION The Consolidated Plan evaluated gaps in the institutional structure and actions that might be taken to strengthen the system. It was determined that one main action that can be taken Page 22 2/ () City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2006-2007 Annual Action Plan toward this is increasing expertise of staff and City Council, which in turn will increase the CDBG program efficiency and effectiveness. Increased contact and coordination among City departments will also contribute to the CDBG program's effectiveness. The City will continue to encourage direct contact between itself and the Public Housing Agency and other service providers operating in the region. Most of the coordination efforts in the west end are tied to funding resources and the type of service provided. . PUBLIC HOUSING IMPROYEMENTS Each year the City reviews the Annual Comprehensive Grant application submitted by the Housing Authority whereby the City must certify consistency of the activities with the goals and objectives of the Consolidated Plan. . MONITORING Monitoring serves as an effective tool to ensure that federal funds are spent in a manner consistent with the CDBG National Objectives and that the programs and projects are achieving stated goals. The following outlines basic monitoring requirements that are followed in the implementation of the CDBG program. Standards Utilized for Review o Is the program meeting intended objectives? o Is the agency capable of tracking and/or documenting necessary benefit information and carrying out the responsibilities of its program consistent with federal requirements? o Is appropriate and accurate documentation submitted in a timely manner? Monitorinq Procedures Construction Projects - All construction projects are expected to comply with federal labor and procurement procedures as well as the various affirmative action and equal opportunity requirements required by various federal and state laws. To ensure this end, CDBG staff developed a Procurement and Contract Compliance Manual that outlines the various procedures and steps required as part of contract management. The CDBG coordinator oversees and reviews contract preparation at each step from bid preparation, contract document preparation, pre-construction meetings, and ongoing project inspections. Subrecipient Agencies - All Sub recipient agencies must sign a contract with the City in which the various scope of work, time line, and documentation requirements are outlined. On a monthly basis, each Sub recipient must submit detailed information regarding the number, ethnicity, and income level of individuals benefiting with CDBG funds. Quarterly summary reports are required of some agencies in which further information is provided on activities accomplished in that quarter. The City's monitoring goal is to conduct an on-site inspection of each agency at least once a year, preferably toward the end of the funding cycle. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION The preparation of a representative and useful Annual Action Plan is the result of an effective citizen participation process. The City of Rancho Cucamonga encourages and solicits the participation of its residents in accordance with the provisions of its Citizen Participation Plan. The following steps were taken to ensure adequate public participation. Page 23 2/1 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2006.2007 Annual Action Plan 1. A public notice of available funds and soliciting project applications was published in the Inland Valley Dailv Bulletin on November 1, 2005. Copies of the notice were also posted at City Hall and mailed to approximately 50 individuals and organizations. 2. Notice regarding the 30-day review period and availability of the draft 2006-2007 Annual Action Plan and notice of the public hearing was published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin on February 28, 2006. Letters providing notice of the public hearing and indicating documents availability were mailed to surrounding jurisdictions, the County of San Bernardino, and the Housing Authority of San Bernardino County. Copies of the notice were posted at City Hall, Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center, Lion's Park Community Center, and the Rancho Cucamonga Public Library. The public hearing was held on March 15, 2006. Page 24 2/2 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2006-2007 Annual Action Plan ApPENDIX "A" - EXECUTIYE SUMMARY 2006-2007 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN . PURPOSE OF THE CONSOLIDATED PLAN The Consolidated Plan is a comprehensive 5-year strategy that addresses the use of federal grant/entitlement funds, such as CDBG funds to meet the goal of providing decent housing, a suitable living environment, and expanded economic opportunities principally for persons of low- and moderate-income. . PURPOSE OF THE ANNUAL ACTION PLAN The Annual Action Plan identifies specific projects consistent with the Consolidated Plan 5-year strategy listing the projects, programs, and resources that will be utilized during the program year. During the 2005-2006 program year, the City will receive an entitlement allocation of $ 1,034,606, which is $ 100,002 less than fiscal year 2005-2006. These funds will be used to support the following housing and community development activities. Prior Yearl FY 2006/2007 Total Available Reprogram Allocation fRevolving Loan $ 0.00 $ 206,921.00 $ 206,921.00 $0.00 $ 206,921.00 $ 206,921.00 Project Type Implementing Agency Administration Sidewalk Grinding Wheelchair Ramps Etiwanda Railway Station Chatfey Isle/Norton-Fisher Calle Vejar (Construction) Hellman/Arrow Drainage CaDitallmDrovementProiects Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Dept. Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Dept. Rancho Cucamonga Planning Dept. Rancho Cucamonga Planning Dept. Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Dept. Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Dept. $0.00 $22.000.00 $0.00 $ 30.000.00 $0.00 $ 50.000.00 $0.00 $ 40,000.00 $0.00 $ 168,185.00 $ 0.00 $ 8,000.00 SO.OO $ 318,185.00 I Subtotal Home ImDJ'ovement Proaram Home Improvement Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division $0.00. $ 350,000.00 $0.00 $ 10.000.00 $0.00 $ 360,000.00 Public Services Graffiti Removal Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Division $0.00 $ 22,000.00 Fair Housing Inland Mediation Board $0.00 $ 12,000.00 landlordrT enant Inland Mediation Board $0.00 $ 10,000.00 Emergency Shelter Foothill Family Shelter $ 0.00 $ 5.000.00 Emergency Shelter House of Ruth $ 0.00 $ 7,600.00 Food Distribution SOVA $ 0.00 $ 7,000.00 Youth Activity YMCA - Your Own Club $ 0.00 $ 5,000.00 Senior Transportation West End YMCA $0.00 $ 15,000.00 Senior Programs Rancho Cucamonga Community Services $0.00 $ 16.000.00 Human Services/Recreation Northtown Collaborative $ 0.00 $ 12.000.00 $ 22,000.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $ 40,000.00 $ 168,185.00 $ 8.000.00 $ 318,185.00 $ 350,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 360,000.00 $ 22,000.00 $ 12.000.00 $ 10.000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 7.600.00 $ 7,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 16.000.00 $ 12.000.00 Page A-1 2/3 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2006-2007 Annual Action Plan Project Type Total Available Literacy Food Distribution Youth Activity Sexual Assault Assistance Career/Education/Jobs Human Services/Recreation Implementing Agency Rancho Cucamonga Public Library Oldtimers Foundation Camp Fire USA Project Sister Hope Through Housing Foundation Rising Stars of Equestrian Therapy Prior Year I Reprogram I Revolving Loan $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $149,513.00 FY 200612007 Allocation $ 10,000.00 $ 8.500.00 $ 6,700.00 $ 9.700.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 3.000.00 $154,500.00 $ 1,034,606.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 8.500.00 $ 6,700.00 $ 9,700.00 $ 5.000.00 $ 3.000.00 $ 154,500.00 $ 1,034,606.00 Page A-2 2/1 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2006-2007 Annuaf Action Pfan ApPENDIX "B" - SUMMARY OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING 5-YEAR AND 1-YEAR GOALS . These figures are not cumulative, but represent the number of units operated by the Housing Authority during the program year. HOUSING AFFORDABILlTY OBJECTIVE 1: Program 1.1: Program 1.2: OBJECTIVE 2: Program 2.1: Program 2.2: OBJECTIVE 3: Program 3.1:. Program 3.2: OBJECTIVE 4: Program 4.1: Program 4.2: CONSERVATION OF THE EXISTING SINGLE-FAMILY AND MULTIPLE-FAMILY AFFORDABLE HOUSING STOCK. Acquisition of existing multiple-family units to be held for future affordable housing. Acquisition and rehabilitation of existing single-family homes. IMPROVE ACCESS TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOR ALL LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS, WITH EMPHASIS ON THE PRODUCTION OF LARGER (3+ BEDROOM) RENTAL UNITS. Construction of affordable multi-family units. Construction of single-family infill development in low- and moderate- income neighborhoods. PROVIDE DIRECT RENTER ASSISTANCE TO LOW- AND MODERATE- INCOME HOUSEHOLDS IN ORDER TO OBTAIN OR RETAIN PERMANENT HOUSING. Support applications by the Housing Authority of San Bernardino County for Section 8 and public housing assistance. Participate in the County HOME Consortium Tenant Based Assistance (TBA) program. INCREASE HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES FOR LOW- AND MODERATE- INCOME HOME OWNERSHIP, PARTICULARLY THROUGH HOMEBUYER ASSISTANCE. Administer a City sponsored Home Buyer Program. Participate in the County HOME Consortium Homeownership Assistance Program (HAP) for eligible first-time homebuyers. Page B-1 2/5 City of Rancho Cucamanga Community Development Block Grant Program 2006-2007 Annual Action Plan Program 4.3: NHDC First-Time Home Buyer program. OBJECTIVE 5: Program 5.1 : Program 5.2: OBJECTIVE 6: Program 6.1 : REHABILITATION OF THE EXISTING HOUSING STOCK WITH EMPHASIS ON OWNER-OCCUPIED HOUSING. Provide moderate rehabilitation of owner occupied, single-family and mobile homes for extremely low-, low-, and moderate-income homeowners. Participate in the County HOME Consortium Rental Rehabilitation Program. IMPROVE LIVING CONDITIONS FOR LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS. Support applications of the Housing Authority for their annual Comprehensive Grant to improve living conditions for public housing residents. Page B-2 ;2/10 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant Program 2006-2007 Annual Action Plan ApPENDIX "C" -ATTACHMENTS SUPPORTING MAPS: PROPOSED PROJECTS AND Low-MoD INCOME SUPPORTING FORMS: FUNDING SOURCES, CONTINUUM OF CARE GAPS ANALYSIS, SPECIAL NEEDS/NON-HOMELESS, HOUSING NEEDS, AND COMMUNITY NEEDS LISTING OF PROPOSED PROJECTS CERTIFICATIONS Page C-l 2/7 , "J'~ "r..r;'\r, ._._._..J ". ,._._.J , ~ ,'". I ':". '-'~'l r-l '-. '-'1 . 'oJ ''-'1 ..-- . ---I --' I ". r-- . -. _'. --a. I I ,I I, I I I >- 0.' '" ~ .r: 1'-' c: '" '" 1;) '" " 0- W b Ul ~ Iii '0. c: 'iij a: . ._.1 L-. l....._. : \ ..I ( - Ul e U) I! c _ '" 0 (,) e ;:; Q) -eo.. ! ._cnCDUJ 1i Oeec '2 '~"',.>~~ff! ~ I~~iil OUle.-: u ..,,~e<c " 'O-.::ECDg>>2 g'u..UJ"-a.. Z. 0.9 2 -eel) c;; 1;; Iii 'E .!:! .!::! .2.c t--S ,,0=0 ::Jea C22:iSc'S ! ....cuoo.::pCG::J::JaJoN a. < w:z::z:.5oii:......"'> cD o . 0 C'\I Ul '" u '2' '" Ul c: '" .~ i:3 o 'c '" Ul <' " z o :! < C) :::> u o X ;'0 Z < a: .0 ------+--::s~0)-~ - c: () .- " c: c: ~ ";;:: o Cl ~ .:....(ij "'.. >", 0" e.- ",Ul. a:-- . , c c . . I> "- '. ~ ,'i. .~ a: . cG ---"- " c: '" .~ w (jC l!l c: '" E CD > . o. ~ a. .E '" 0> '" c: "e .~' ,0 1;; .... "0 ,g~, 5 <(:0: (0. j 0 c.~ > u. CtI..... 0 0> E (!l E c: '=.l:I:: ~ "US Q)(ij ~" . I.' 3:';"'_-2 o '" J: "0: ~ .c (j): CJ 0) . : . ,~ . .~ I' . ;../' I . f3," . ..:....' ",. L -.", '8' " /' .~.,-.~~.-t.~ :-'~r~ Q . . .. II ~ Q .. .. . Ul u 'in '" '" o .1'- ~ " '" '" . 0> c:' '0 ,!; a ~ Iii ..... CD " i:ii . 11' . . , L._. '~ ~ ~ ::< >- . Oi a .. .--: /, ./ '"' I I' i,. c .... ii:' c o :;:0 C) <c I I I 1 1 )2 /<6 ->~--, il < <.i .!: ~ '" o 1i! fl u '" OJ .5'80: 'C::!:!!l!!l Ooll",,,, Il! ~ <: .. ~ .3 ~: ~ lu' =-11 .._i , "''-. I' ~ '. " 1 l \:~ l 'l'- ,I ,.j.... - ...- ~'I.-__ t .... .... -' ~-----"I ' -' , " .-" "- --'V . ~ i 'I ,>, '. I , " , I'> , '...... . I , --. 1 , i .'- . --_:;J._,___,,~j~_~~ -<~~B'.I~ . ., ,- _1 I!]J' -1 , ! . --r~-.:~i--:--- t-lL:" --~,- ,~...~ - " , ~._.~~~. - -t ,-'i',..' I r I, ;', j I -----;~,<; --I. .... !! 1_ I , I r--;--T:r, : ; - . \. ! I' 1:;- i;, i ' II ", -----.-.- .~____--L----t--L_-"-,- ". ";':';-''>y.,-:.:} ":'i:":>.., c: as 0: 'C .. OJ :g (5 U) <: 8 0> o o C\I , ll) o o C\I z() [-----,- _'1_11_'1_'._11' r"-"-'_~.~J-.T ~- .. '- ~ -~.~',- ,"":' I '" . ~:~;~~~<'>'.v<, l. .. I I _,H-.... "';'\ ';1"' ~ ::~ ~,/.\~:~{ ,;\~~,h: :.:..JJ_L'i. 'I II-.'_'~_I.. I ".L . ,"-- -- -I I '-L'.--_'."'--"'-r 1 I . I , I ~:=:""51 .. ...- -J I . . - ---'--'---l . ~ -'J _I ; I ,-------," .......-.. .,..1'-- l I I I \ i ',,!"'-_H[,,~~ '.'.' " .:~~ ",1, 'i-_',:,_ - -;-'"=T" C,{=-----'L:- ~_H~: l_ \." :<; ~))~; . " ~r;.;:-. J _1CC~ -n i ii, ..' -'~ ;1 r'-"-"-'!~r~"'l\ j'"",,;' ,," -~i-:'j>~~, !~:I-';.;.. I '7Hi~;i IH~~!:r)!\'~(~ ~,,!( ,m W t ':! I ' *~J ~ - '"r 01'-;'.--\-\\": =I~ I <:, ,!'l}-j I ;.: . J-' ',' ::)1.: ,:'" ,!; I :- i __ ,-, ,"_" ~.-- rOI. . ,. '~I""" , ; '[ cT !' i i ',~ tel I -- . -.- f1' " ^ " - '~\~~'TI,~t,(~:~,! !~J, l~~i: !ft~,:{jj~r~;~C'<1 ill !'l -, lLj!~; I" i ~r~(r--;]~jTj':;; ::ih- -VI- - -I .~\!' ~\:r-~ ,J "l-.'!~}~~,' U:J,~!T~;hT:"1~~2~ h1~:~~;-~:' -I "I 1_ _ ___..~ -:.1-;;:; Co"i enUe^v:PiiiQ;45;v ---;'I=f;=-[;--"-~d\' ,c_ -:-=' =; , j':'j,-r-.-'--'-L:.-'c-.c'I'! " 1.......,_1 '_'"~ L....I--'r.., :..,_,-_~~.'. -_';'.. :~'r"":-,',_:.;'-,...-:;.-.+...,\.,.,,-~~.'~~----: -;'=~~-:T~ :--c (c~ '- "~.':' . ~1 !J:1'H~ . e;;l ;(i ",'~ 'E2J~;~ () , III I!! I '; C I" . 1~_ L-= -- ..., , - _---' ., '-r 1_'. :-_,'i_,_':. L.' I 1..:1 i1 "'. . "- _ I ~ .'J_ r----' I_;~_l_\ -j - L 1 _u, :-:.F~~::~~ ;~,~~i,~~ ~3~~~'~;\"\~~~\~'i~ ?,'-- 'I ! ; L \_.1: I' _'L ~-=~ '~~=J!. '-, +Jl~-~~' ' :'.1.'t}', ,,,_.J/~,,.J:-Ul-l-i1"~{'-;'J' !" ~\ _, ,,~ '.r'-.'"i:! ~..I"~~'~~; .. . i I \,. J-:',.. ;' ~,~" I " I, ,-: 'n I! -,,-)! L II,! ~L,...'-'~: ~-\.;,-j!'-!7-):~_}..!"\ _~~,-- t.,_LL~j_::_1 -~__..i:_I'.'I '-.:i' -- II -, 11:,-~:,'='=,'~., ,.-,;;.- '_' _. .,~' I., "'''' ;'- :'-_:'-=;;'"-,,--,,,,-,".;..~.!-+,..;;..:',I,...-,..-.-'~';"""-'~';" .,.,,_=:_1. .. r" ! .-: .~, .......' -r- " ''.f+~~'~,-~~Il.I''~/'i.jU~~Ji:~L ..' j ----',--t.~: :". ../ '. '(fJ" "I~ -! -' t_' ,--'- -'::,..._".::j'--'.... . .... I. I '1=','-,',.'."-. ,i : I,' " , ;'~_~:_.j:"o~~~'~"~-:I'.I. .' ii' , '," .L-; -" ; ; .rl ~, ~ ~"r'" "-)-'1!~~i-'=:fli'~qttiI1i:l:r~ if ;liTr;:'-'T I i-\~:~';{' +-----., !J~i~i!i '" : - .- -- -, ~-~ --1--,-------:.- anua^'tI J~lsa4:J01::I, "'.-.\ . ;-'1 i :~J-t\-L .~- El"U"~_~IlH r .1 .1' :r~ t ~411~ +~j.W~ ~:,:;- ~~;I-, f--h-- ( 19 Funding Sources Entitlement Grant (includes reallocated funds) CDBG ESG HOME HOPWA Total $1,034,606 $0 $0 $0 Prior Years' Program Income NOT previously programmed or reported ~G ~ ESG $0 HOME $0 HOPWA $0 Total Reprogrammed Prior Years' Funds CDBG ESG HOME HOPWA Total $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Estimated Program Income Section 108 Loan Guarantee Fund TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES Other Funds Submitted Proposed Projects Totals Un-Submitted Proposed Projects Totals $1,034,606 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,034,606 ~ $1,034,606 $0 2.2 () Continuum of Care: Gaps Analysis - Persons in Families with Children Beds/Units Estimated Current Unmet Needl Relative Needs Inventory Gap Priority Emergency Shelter 114 13 111 IHlgh Transitional Housing 10 10 10 IMed Permanent Housing 10 10 10 I Low Total 14 3 11 Estimated Supportive Services Slots Job Training 10 I 10 10 INane Case Management 10 I 10 10 INane Child Care 10 I 10 10 INane Substance Abuse Treatment 10 I 10 10 INane Mental Health Care 10 I 10 10 INane Housing Placement 10 I 10 10 INane Life Skills Training 10 I 10 10 INane , Estimated Sub-Populations Chronic Substance Abusers 10 10 10 INane Seriously Mentally III 10 10 10 INane Dually-Diagnosed 10 10 10 INane Veterans 10 10 10 INane Persons with HIVlAIDS 10 10 10 INane Victims of Domestic Violence 10 10 10 INane Other Categories Asked To Leave By Roommates 14 10 14 IHlgh Job Loss 13 10 13 IHlgh Unable To Pay Rent/Utilities 17 10 17 IHigh :<2/ ;1)) Special Needs/Non-Homeless Sub-Populations Elderly Frail Elderly Severe Mental Illness Developmentally Disabled PhysicallY Disabled Persons with Alcohol/Other Drug Addiction Persons with HIV/AIDS Priority Need IHlgh I I Low I I Low I IHigh I IHigh I IMed I I Low I Estimated $ I $2,000,000 1$0 1$0 1$50,000 r $750,000 1$32,000 1$0 TOTAL 1$2,832,000 J , ;;<;;3 Housing Needs Renter Need Level Units Estimated $ Small Related 0- 30% of MFI I High 1355 1$0 31 . 50% of MFI IHigh 1451 ISO 51 . 80% of MFI IMed 1791 ISO Large Related 0- 30% of MFI I High 170 IsO 31 - 50% of MFI IHlgh 1105 1$0 51 - 80% of MFI I Moo 1303 IsO Elderly 0- 30% of MFI IHlgh 1222 ISO 31 - 50% of MFI IHlgh 1133 ISO 51 - 80% of MFI I Moo 1136 IsO All Other o - 30% of MFI I High 1210 ISO 31 - 50% of MFI IHlgh 1231 ISO 51 - 80% of MFI I Moo 1566 IsO Owner o . 30% of MFI IHlgh 1731 ISO 31 . 50% of MFI IHlgh 1975 [SO 51 - 80% of MFI I Moo 11,928 IsO 2.2f Community Needs Anti-Crime Programs Need Level Units Estimated $ Overall None 0 $0 Sub-Categories Crime Awareness (051) None 0 $0 Economic Development Need Level Units Estimated $ Overall Low 0 $0 Sub-Categories Rehab; Publicly or Privately-Owned Commer (14E) None 0 $0 CI Land Acquisition/Disposition (17A) None 0 $0 Cllnfrastructure Development (17B) None 0 $0 CI Building Acquisition, Construction, Re (17C) None 0 $0 Other CommerciaVlndustriallmprovements (17D) None 0 $0 ED Direct Financial Assistance to For-Pro (18A) None 0 $0 ED Technical Assistance (18B) None 0 $0 Micro-Enterprise Assistance (18C) None 0 $0 ,Infrastructure Need Level Units Estimated $ Overall High 16 $1,478,000 Sub-Categories Flood Drain Improvements (031) Med 1 $8,000 Water/Sewer Improvements (03J) None 0 $0 Street Improvements (03K) High 5 $1,250,000 Sidewalks (03L) High 10 $220,000 Tree Planting (03N) None 0 $0 Removal of Architectural Barriers (10) None 0 $0 Privately Owned Utilities (11) None 0 $0 Planning & Administration Need Level Units Estimated $ Overall High 0 $0 Sub-Categories :225 ;JJ~ Community Needs (Page 3) Youth Programs Need Level Units Estimated $ Overall Med 5 $50,000 Sub-Categories Youth Centers (03D) None 0 $0 Child Care Centers (03M) None 0 $0 Abused and Neglected Children Facilities (03Q) None 0 $0 Youth Services (05D) High 5 $50,000 Child Care Services (05L) None 0 $0 Abused and Neglected Children (05N) None 0 $0 Other Need Level Units Estimated $ Overall None 0 $0 Sub-Categories Urban Renewal Completion (07) None 0 $0 CDBG Non-profit Organization Capacity Sui (19C) None 0 $0 CDBG Assistance to Institutes of Higher E (19D) None 0 $0 Repayments of Section 108 Loan Principal (19F) None 0 $0 Unprogrammed Funds (22) None 0 $0 ) ) :217 0 0 0 ~ 0 ~ '" '" '" '" ~ ~ '" '" '" '" II) GI '" U e .. :g :l 0 ~ III u. Ii; Cl ;; - C <( ..J 5 c:: '6 el w <: <( s III C III el :::;; a- t; E :l Cl en 0 0 ~ u.. 0 w :I: :I: f- a.. 0 ~ II) e .2 III III - 1!! c - c () GI 1D c:: c:: III llE '2 .1lI III .- :t:.c 'E .c 0:: e lij~ II ... a.. ::J "C 'Cc. E ol:l III "C oE l.'! - III 00 ~ Cl~ III >cU 0 'i:~ a- c:::: a.. e 'iii 0 0 'lii"C " III :Eo e :J ... " ~ 0 c:: a.. ci el ~ J: 0 - ::):!:: <( R '0 () 0 J:O Cij III r C Cl - a.. c:: c:: () :;::::; III III E :::i "iij - '~iil 1:: ,"0 III 0;;;: 0._ ,"e- el a.. ~ Q) ~oii .~ES III Cl III ;6, - g. ~.91fi5 cO C e'05~<DQ. ODe .2 III t)Cc-m 'O.c'O._ ~~ c4 .- aJ-015 0'5 c CD c~ .5 E c ~.s c: <<l~ i ~ ~ =eO ::J E ('tI ClJ._"O O(ij.....c. rJl -" 'O"'o-c,- g 8~ ca~::;:~asai~ g5~ 'O.....c all) 2- ::::1.0__ <<l ca.a.Q:lcQ)~-gQ)~~ ,"0 ~C!)(ij.s ~ [g:2 aJ(;; c ~ e," C .~:g 8 ~ ~5.e l!l'~ 8" 'g .E -0 ~.!2 2U::;eQ)-g~=~.sa O;t: .5 c e .!!i!Q).~a.Eca.Q~Q)~ ~ cO os: Q. 0 0.-5 en .5 8 c g 6i -g "E ~ oE O'i: ~ ~'E ~ cti.5 ~.~ c: C'tl::;: 1U ~~ "i: U U> mQ)..c.!.c'cCDm 1D'" l~ "2 rgEa;Sgo~a:d2.c:: 'E ~-Q)~"'-O>'O~ "c C lrl no.. '0 Q) Q) Q) en e c < ~ .. ~g{g~E~~~~lt.9 e -.- '" EQ)E ~11 1D Q)~= ~-g .:mig g:g ",E", e o~ 0, '2 '2 51 0 5l.o COj 8.s:a Q) 0- 'E >~C:2:3: UJenc.241 o 0. 0 0'- lij d:.5 a ...c II e58Q)oCD_<DO'E.r::. 0..0 Ii: Q.. 0_COa:lO.__ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ iD Cl ~ t: e l!l .2 en Q; 0. E 8 10 " " " E ~ e ~ ~ '2 el ~ E ~ E 0 0 8 z z 25 -0 11= _Ill 28 o....J ~" (/) Cl <( (; ~. > U> iil J: Q; ~ E - 0 e Ul " " :I: U> ~ "0. C " 0 ':ij 0 .. .. :Q @ 0. 0. .2> .c Q; Q; ~ :I: :I: Iii en ..J ~ ., ~ r ;21S - C Gl E Q. o ~ Gl Ul o 't) C C Gl ca ca -- .cc::e ~'CQ. all$i Cl~ Ul C ._ 0 .- '0 Q. Ul Ul 0 gCG. :1:0_ _00 00 Cl -Q.C c .- GlOUj E ::::; t: III Q. Gl o c4 ::l ~ :; o .. o 0 .. .. ~ o ~ o .. .. ~ 0> c: '6 ::> 5 0 "- In ~ Cl .c c: <( ~ 15 'i5 Cl w ;: "iii ~ ::; 0.. ~ c: '" 0 0 ::> 0 r r IL u w .l!l C GlGI _E E! :!::J:: 'ii .!! " c: " '8~ Q. E! ~ " (.)8 1l c: " "u '2 Q. 1i~ " " 1Il 2: C. .\1 iil :::iE.S! :a 5 0.. O'&j " '" 0.. R l)j ~= :1:(,) gJ on c ~.S! "i:Q. 0".: "i: Co) ~tn E~ 1-> tin ._ GI 0'- ~.c DoO c -0 11= 'e'g Do...J ~ " ~ {!. ~ " 1ilE ,sg ({l.~ 'g~ ,,~ 0>" "'"8 ~ E . "2'0 (f.l ,,"ijl ~"'" ~~c ooca Ci;: 'il cSa. O,,~ C~.c -g'Oi ~~51 .- - 0 :g~.s c. C' -0 (ijC1)c 8,s '" - ~ ~ -oQ .~... ~ '" c." ~.5 c. gj " '2 " C/l .\1 :a " 0.. on 8 >Xl c;; -g " o rJ to ui .!l2:'5 III - "$;.. '<=".- ,...w=> ~~.s -5 ~ ~~.!a ui ca.....-B "">:QOC1l=cOlQ)o. ~f!?'-'C-oc:>cS'2 -g ~ ~ t;~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ S-'C... tJ) o.u.c c_ o 8 \1l'ijj'~8 ~ .<E ~ -..c'C5:5 U~;;::Ol e?oc cll)ocs;:, ocna:l~Q)~.cQ)~c( S >. >>.2:g (l) (.) > m c: _.0= Q) 15 c< ....._ Qi ~ .~ ~j .~ t2 :g ~ $ Q);;:::Ec:Q.x Q>]gQ)C 'E; OE"C 2..c.-:; Q) ..2 &i ~~.9! 2:;'-5g~ g:2l)-oi'l"''c';;:''l!! (l)C c=t)'Cca;::) .~eicag._l1)oo'S ~:Q Q)~c: ~~'O.Qu -:c C:'-8 al 0 Q) CD a:l Eo~'O =~N~Ol ~:!2~~(ij~tI)(Slg ~::ge ~E';;~~E a m ~ co Lt) ~.g <<l:2 sq >..~ 0 Q) 0 r:::: .0 _ ~ ~~;aH Ci3::J alu ~ I ~ 0 CD CD ~ ~ 1: c: '" 0 Ui ~ C. E 8 o 0 z z ... ~ gj .. E o r " ,s c. .. r i ~ .\1 :a " 0.. E ~ " ~ 'is. " ~ g ~ ~ 0; .l; ~ " <( C/l U ... C/l o ::;: 5 > I ,<= l " ~ ,s c. .. r c ~ " '" . "a c ~'g S ;g ... N .g .g ~ jjj (f.l ...J C) ~ 0; 1S .. 0> c: .. 0 0> E " '" o g E U g E <..l c: o '" ti a: ~ .~ o ,; " :;; ~ ~ <( U ~ ~ 1: 'S <? u is ~ ~ :: 22q - I: Q) E c. o ~ Q) III ~I:ll CU CU.o ..cc..... :;"Cc.. .....Q)"C --Q) OlCUIII 1::20 .- "0 c. III III 0 61:&: J:O_ _00 o C 01 -c..1: ljioij E .- t:: ..J Cll C. Q) C c4 ::I :l I:! :J o III CI c '6 c :J II. ~ "i)GI _E ~~ ogc. oE 00 .~~ 't;j'C ::::Eo O- S ::l._ :%:0 c ~.2 i:Q. O.t: ;::u ~~ :!::"i) 1-> .. .- u" .!!.lil o;c !to a -0 .. - lil- 28 11...J ill 0 0 0 ill 0 '" '" '" ~ '" ~ ~ ~ ~ '" '" <( el w:;: III el ::; a. Q (/) 0 0 () W J: I '" E " E " e "- ,!; ;; ~ U; '" l:l '" E " E ~ "- ,!; ;; ~ U; l;; 'iij' > 2 ;3 '" '" 8 ..J ~ ~ 1ii R '" e! " ~ " ~ " Q. iil a. ~ => ~ ;;; !!! E " ;; .~ ~ !!I :02 ~ => "- U ~.~ Q):2: i~~8~ Vl!5gQ) me', E Co c!l 8 oe~c :="S; Q)'- . ~iigEn '" 0 "- g.c: 'C -;: B S~53.Eu ~~~~2 ,,~- ." >..c:::cm,C O~'->l- a.Q)Q)o"O .s.9::.e: ffi Q) :g 0.8 ~ :g~~.c 0 E; TI 'iij .g"c D:~5-~~ g '" ~ '5 ~ => u. Ii; .c (5 g {!. ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ 1:: ~ (/)s .2 ;; i5. E 8 E " E III ~ ::1(1) ;;[i ~;;_~ -g ~ 'al CD III i5.J2 Q) u"..;~E EuE .S C.e1ii= ~8~ ~ g~5~~~~aiK U)_ ~<<l__ c.c E 'E UJ (/) Rj 9 Q) Q) "~8~i E ~.ci E =:oy.2'";=,, ~.....'$ co.o......... 0 ~.l:l oCQ:JU)...'C_rnVl C.EQ)~:C o..ai~'O Q) (/)'-Q) ..oem EQ)=o.cQico::lQ) .- >g-_ Q)-=-.s;;;. 16 [i", 1i-o"'~!l:: e as: E Q) (I) co t;::: 0 -c RmQiQ)Q)~c ~~ ~ ....RO'= as 5ig o'x~~ ~o U):2~ CQ) _ Q)'CQ)Q. .QQ)g~ Cls.cE g:5 ~Q) ai ~::-R8 ~'5 Q):2.c'ffi c~ Q) ~- g~S:15'~'5'~ o g! al ~ .....-...... S o 0 ... Q) Ul CD:S 0._ !E~5~ii~~i? t- e 0 0_.0.___ o 0 Z Z ~. (/) Q ;;: (; ~ > :g J: Q; .c E ~ o " J: '" " 0 -S = "- "- Q) Q) J: J: '" ~ <( g ::; - ~ E ..J " E E ca~c; :gel'" '" - .. ~ g b E " U> ..".,. "Q. C ~'iii2 :0 .c co ~~~ r:: 8 i- ~ => 8 '" c; Ill_ 8 ~ G 23() - l: Gl E c.. o "i ~ III C -0 l: l: Gl ca ca -- .0-0 ..a..Q: ::)"0 ....Gl"O .....-Gl C)COIII l:!!0 .- 0 c.. III III 0 Sl:Q: :J:O_ _()O o c C) -a..l: l: " .- Gl....'lij E .- t:: ..J CO c.. Gl C CI? ::) III ~ :J o f/) en c '6 c :J u.. !!l c :!!~ ~s::. ~~ -g~ UO ><() 'C ~ 'lii"i:! :!!o oE ~- :z:u c ~.2 "i:'O. 0-;:: .~ () 'till E~ 1-> 1)- al() '_ al 0'- ~.c 11.0 is -0 (l- al- el! ~o 1I...J 800 0 "fflfflfoli- <Ii .. <C Cl w;;: "' Cl ::;; 0.. S ~ ~ ~ U> " " .~ c1l "'" '5 ~ c :g <C CIJ :l ~ u: c. E '" () I"- 8 8 I"- <Ii .. o .. ...J ~ '" c '5 c " U. :;; 5 ]i ~ ~ 5 '" d l"- on ~ " c " ~ " ~ 0.. o '" U> E i!! '" 2 0.. "'" '5 ~ "'" 'i "0- CIl cOCll .s ctI~8 oCll c6g'fO:6o .- > -.0 ::l"C= :ge ~acrc.g c.c.E "C_Q)ctIa. ,,'" 8"'" U>- "C._ .- .... ca; c ~ E "0 Q) 0 "'238.5- > cng we Q)1iieQ)~ m "E.!f E 'u) a.a.~' .... CIloCl1EQ)= ClJC-oc:t:.-E,c oo~c _ a:l '-'S (1)'- . ctl 0 en :Cc-o"'i=glfi " " 0 " c. U> __ " a. E3Q.Q)'O oC) .Q(tl'-SaJ . ;.~-go.~gel!?$ -=ttl-"CQ)Q):J..... ~ ~ ~ ~ 1ij :i'"8 ~ -B E~..Qas.;~Ew2 ~ J:: C en.c '2: 'C . 'Z) e ~'Q)~; Q) li'2"O a. ~ IS c U) , Ii) fij .s.9=€ (13; ~ c "u>O.8lio--8l 'C.!!!~.r::: 0 c.o'~:e .~ ~ co ,21'2 C: Q; 0.. ZS a:~ 5-~ ~ g~ 1Il~ ~ ~ 8 l:> ;:0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o III 1: c '" 0 il5 ij 15. E 8 c o <~ E i ~ .5 (f) ~ 00 Q)~::J CI GloEo'Q)CIl .2 $c.mlfiUJ~~a. ctl CIl-:2-g 0.0 m LrF.9'8 ctI E~.~ c: c u Q) _ql~ ~ ocn.QcoO:JQ) t: c rn ._ c" >oCIJ ~ (tl.- UJ ctI'O.c .""- caS Q) oc"O'al"..... . Q)CII)"OQ)Q)Q)5UJ .r:::J COC 0.'0....;: ~ -.@EctlQ)'>U5~"" .5"'Bui'-goQ)(I)5 "0 g_:;.- a."2;E (I) CIl._ c:~ ClUJ 11)1-15 ai'E Q:l (/).5.-> ~ ~~~~.~.Qf2~ !{l Q:l ~~.c 2.f~.~ ~m >.Q:l-o ~O)O) > .s::~ctl-o= 1.0 ctl ~~~~~~~~~ ctl=(/)~~a.ictl.a- Z_Q:lcQ)o~o~ Q.O:c8.<1.1 c_-'5 E~~Ulai~~8c -~ ... ... Q:l.c Q:l i'S:::!: ~ Uctlc...._..._ _ o 0 Z Z ~. CIJ C ;;: o ~ > m i: a; "'" E 'i o " :I: u> " 0 j;; ::; 2-c. " a; :I: :I: i d l"- on ~ Q:l ." "0 0.. ;E ~ z- "a "5 .~ ~ ~ 8 1': " .!!l. ~:~ 8 ;g - ~ .!?,g g jjj UJ ...J 23/ - e Gl E c.. o ~ Gl Ul C () e e Gl lG ca -- .a-O ...l1.a: ;:)'2"0 oll-Gl C)l'GUl e:s!O .- '0 c.. Ul Ul 0 Sea: ::E:O_ _00 o c C) -" s; c'" .- Gl(,)'lij E .- 1::: ..J III c.. Gl C ~ ;:) ~ :J o Ul Cl c '6 c :J II- .l!l C "ilGl _E ~.c Iij:!! '8~ 00 > .. - u" .!!!.1Il 0- ....D 11.0 is -0 u= .!!!.1II ~8 Q...J ... ~ )( 0 0 0 oi;R-El9-fR- lii '" <( Cl w;;= m CJ ~ a.. o 00 0 0 U W I I .2 .9 '" :;: <;; '" ailS " .- "iiilO ~~ Q) <('" "'~ _0.. Q) '" :> o J: Q) u; 1- Q) 'lij '" u ;;; '" 5 a; ;:: @ .,; '" '" ...J <( 15 f- S' ~ '" d ... "' '" ~ '0 3'. .2 j5 :> a. " r::"" ~~fa C:._ ~ ~.s; eQ)(ij 0." '" q) C R c<<l=: .20Cij .-::Q:lQ) ""'" r::r::" 8",- ..2:0 "'- :> c.5 Co "0 CI CD :>r::", 0;- "''''0 "'- ~:ss e'O c "'r::" o."'E :J_"C 'OJ::Qi ~g'C so", ~Q)c := ai.Q ai S.!:;!:: Co "> e-g:: "= 0" a::Q)u3: o '" '" r:: '6 r:: :> U. ;;; '" 5 ]i ~ it- :a Q:l '5 J:: :;~ a:I u ~ti a;.~... <1>; 2;:: VI 0 .;;; ~ ti Q):C';:: -- _I- a. ~:g.s.~..;.5 0",,"'0'" ._" ,.,.- r:: a; :J 5.1:: Q)'- .....13 0 c.x:-g .scQ)Q)Q):J CI)'- en.;;; _ e:gS=:-:j .g~~J!e.2: 0'- 0 :oJ Q) U;o+:;-gu~ :cC'lJBal.s.:: 'Ci:Ectl)(tl CU)"CQ:lQ:l= '" 8. 0 E '" coEc-;;~ .2 D: 'C e 0.2: ca c> c U ~ . <<l c: 0 ca CD IV C 0>;:: .... en !l.g Qd~ m eo=~o>- . Q.I o"'c .~ ~ Q)Q>Eg*:Sm F~~J:;'OE>. ~ g ~ ~ i1i .$ 3 2l t: r:: S .2 00 Qi "i3. E 8 o 0 z z ~. '" '" " " E o J: Q) =:; 0. " J: c: " E E ~ :g Cl iJl (ij ~ .3 Jt ~. 00 o <( o > I '" j " '" o =:; 0. 0; J: c: " " ._.?:-_' "5. c "0 0 ij) ~ 0; <3 ~ r:: o E g u o '" " r:: '" II: ~ r:: ~ '" " r:: ~ LiJ ~ ... 23J S< 0 0 0 ~~~f09. o "' '" ~ o "' '" o '" :I '" () c: .. '6 :s c: 0 " l/l "- Cl :;; '" - c: <( ~ 5 I: '6 Cl w 0: Gl c: m Cl ::; ll. ~ E :s 0 '" ~ 0 Co u.. () W I 0 Qj ~ III J!l c - c: () Gl ~ I: I: Gl <> III III .- ".I: 'C: 0 Ii .!!! 9 .c a. ... '" ~ .... ... a. 'f ~ ::::l 'C 'tic. .. Gl 'C oE E ~ cll'lij Gl (.)0 !l III ><() " 0 Cl'C '" ;E 0 'Coli! .;;; ~ iri I: ,- "c: '0 'W 0 Co 'tii-c a:o ~ .. ~ 0 C:; "- ::::I III ... :!.2 o~ '" -" 1: c: I: a. 0 :g 0 0 O'tii z" '" .. :J: 0 - :::J:!:: m'" R ll. Iii :.al (,) 0 CO~ C. - :%:(.) _ll. "' E 0 C Cl 8 - a. I: I: () ; Gl III E :::i <> '" ~ E 1:: <> Iii"'" ~ If. " III -c: E Co E.~ ~ n ". E Gl ~.5~ co...== ~ '" C Q)'Q)- ~.~.g o~ 0 " ~ '" c.'C m -.r:::.c__ Cl '" c4 ~5i.d o:S:E16~ .. " 0; -0 o ~~ c c: ~~.& 0 0 8 ~ <( ::::l ._ en cu .Q 0 0= Q) z Z ...J () ;t;:Q)Q) I ",<>", ai.(i)cCCl..... 5 i.2 O.~eJ:;Ol 1i; <>,,- u;E..c-glS c: _ ,c CD1: :J ~ Q) ~<<la; 0 c: C._ Co .,,~ e E= E 'in 01 CD 1l ~.Q gE~ ... .c::lE o ._ Q) , " "C D. 5 "''''0 ~.~6~N () O'i: ~ Q).g- 'cai;Eco 0 i:i5S '" - l!I - '" "i: u ~CI) (I):~ <> - '" c: ('0. c: ~rn >- ~C:" l5 ~~ ca~ '" i2 ~ ::l~.~ 0 E~ 'C.l::a; ;= Q)~-g ;;: oj 'iij ffig'C ~~~~~ 5 " 1-> a: c: ,c", ('0. ~ l).. .. ~ g c . CIlalUlg!'_ '" > .!!.~ '" .- co: 0 Q) e-g e._.9 '" I c: :;; 19.s~ <<; Q.~ 0._ ~ " i'l .~ Q; ,5 0'- '" ':;: E c::= ~-g-U E .~ '"' ...0 ~~8~ c: 11.0 iii 5 w.t!2 coW 0 c: <ii' -~ I " " 1l ~ '5. "E' " .~ 0 iii ,5 ,5 :c ~ '" Q. 0. :!? .5 12 Q; Q; " I I W '" ...J C -0 l)- ala; '" '2'8 '" 233 8 [:l 11.....1 - I: G) E Q. o ~ G) 1/1 C b I: I: G) ca II -- .a-O ..a..&:: :)"0"0 all.l!!G) C)cal/l 1::20 .- '0 Q. 1/1 1/1 0 51:&:: ::J:O_ _<'>0 o C C) -a.. I: I: <.> .- G) Ui E :::i 1: ca Q. G) c <4 :) III ~ ::::J o en Cl c '6 c ::::J II.. s C GiG) _E =::..c:: 'ai~ 'Be- 00 )(u 'C .'i 'liie: :00 ci :::)=:: J:O c ~,g ".: Q. 0'.: 'Cu It III E~ 1-> -.- ~t) ._G) 2:0- 0.0 a -0 t)- G)- ._111 e8 0..... ~ ~ 0 0 0 ~Eo')fflEo') N '" ..; Cl w ~ '" Cl ::; Q. C '" 0 0 U W I :I: c: :=.1l $t! .- '" '5- -0 ~:: C>.~ c:.o .~ ~ Oc: J:" ~.c: ca -. ILCl ~8 C> c: .~ o J: ~ '0; IL '" " <> '2 " '" .2 E " Q. ~ - ~ 5 '" R '" " -E ~g .~ Ai c:", ,,~ c>" "'"8 8 E . .~ '0 (I) "c:~ "''''" ",~c: 'f!-:!ii c.~~ '0 c:_ 0"", C::.r=. -g'Oj "'~" .2= ~ E!!l.c: " <7- C. "0 -" c: ~6 '" IS"", ->c: ;;oQ '00 a. E ~.S ~ @ N '" o '" ...J ..; 6 f- C> c: :g " IL :;; 5 ~ ~ " c: " ~ " i Q. ~ ~ ~8 ~ o CD CD n; a; C C t: c: S .2 '" -;; C. E 8 -'" c- "E~ .2 m .!!1 ~ ..... a; =r-:= Z'dl cO 0 gUl ~'S: ccoZ' Q) ; 0"'" Q) ~.c: E <>,--'c: 1-<<1 al'(UO) CCl OJ OHI) .- <{ > .s:-: o'-iu <<l ~ ~ a.t: ~ ~ E "0 (l) <I) ''0"'52 0 C-'- ell C ........ .-e=5<<1!-;' Sl-a <::>.5 o ClJ: (1).- ."0 .~~;; a.~Q) 5 Q)"CQlOOCD_ VlC:o::'V:r;'::'e oa:l:;::: 0).... CJ) ttI c . c"-'-.r::. ..... .- C Q) < e Olii c$-gU; a. .c:'O.!!a:l(tJctlfl) .= CIlQ.. E-;::w Q) '" E .-..... > - "0 X-o__ ..... . Q) e >>(0 Q) o OJ1ii 0..010 ~ . c.!;;; "0 c.'C .... U'J .QQi= <<IQ)i~Q) ,51 ~ ~.~~1;i:~ e e"8C~egog a.. 8 ctl 0._ to CIJ o 0 z z ~. '" o ;;: (; ~. > ~ I " a; .c: E j j! " " l'l :; -6 c. c. "a3 Q) J: J: ~ R '" " ~ III 'c: "0 Q. :;: ~ ~ '0.. c '0 ::J ~ E .0 E Jl 8 1: " '" ~ '5. C ;e .~ 2 ,21 .g ....J~ ill '" 23'-/ - c: Gl E c. o ~ Gl III C b c: c: Gl ca <<1-- ..a-O ...11.a: ::)'C'C ~SGl ClCUIII c::20 .- '0 c. III III 0 5c:Jt :1:0_ _00 o C Cl -11.C: c: .- GlOiij E .- ~ .... 8- Gl C c4 ::) s< 0 0 0 (SWWE09 .,; .. @ .,; .. o .. :l 0> () ~ ... '0 ::I ~ 0 ~ CIl u. Iii Q .c l: <( ;;J, 0 'g ~ w ;;: ~ Cl ~ a. 15 ::I 0 (J) 0 LL. U W J: J: f- ,. J!l l: :!!~ e :=~ ~.!!! " ~ " 'CD. ~ oE '" e 00 " " ><() u ~ '2 (I) .;: ~ (I) ~ 'l;j~ (J) ~ (I) :Eo .11 C. :is 0 al Q~ ~ '" a. R a. ::::l._ ~ 0 :z:o '" l: ~.2 ";: D.. 0".: 1:() ~f/l E~ 1-> .. - ()u .!!. Q) 0'- ....c ll.O 25 -Q ll= -e8 1l...J ! -a; .c (J) '" .~ u. (I) 1iiE .co -u "'~ Q)', '0'& ffi~ 0>" "'"8 BE. '2 "C.gJ ~a:R ;t:~l:: e.Q]i c.~u '0(1) ~ - c. 0"", c:=::6 -go ":i: "'""" 0._ en '" 'B32 B ~ 0-; '2 -" ~ " 8';;'" en _~g? .2 u; 0 0 :g "in 0.. ~ a. ~.s8. ~ ~ 8 8 ~ a. '_ :;.S: ~ 0 .~ !9 en 'il~~ U)Q),g ~1iS0)';:: .!!!:is-'''f-g<(~ ergf6:Sui::uca J2G>arti.9.!$-dE U)OJ:.c=(iiCo Ul-t:;E..c!S!~ ~i ~Q).!!!CI):3-Cl ~~1:l~g~_~ ooCe Eec: .r:::......CUcu'?OCOQ)::! ....a.Q):gCDLL~_ OCllOCCU_::IE -:a;~.!!i!Ei:(/)~ 0)(1)"00..')(-8",",0> ~Bai'Ce :Be ..c._ 0..11) a.LL....... a. U) 2: Q) Cii a. >-00 VJ (ij~-g~~.c.c~ 5t'~ ~.~a:l.~'a; :e8.'(ijc~~Z~ "'c.-8"'~-- a::l.g :=2lfiz. ~(/) 0 Ca ~ ~S:'S: >-c;~E~~~~ ~ ~~tb f!'s:f6 ~ 0) ~ 'E Q) ~:g ::E 5 <'fi.f!F a.ro: aH- U) ~ I ~ 0 iD iD ~ ~ " ~ l!l .2 (J) Qi c. 0' E ~ 8 R '" (I) ~ - a. E $ (I) 'is. '" 'iij i! '" .c "C ~ ~ ~ " 0 ~ ::l >- z (J) '" '" '" c;; c;; c;; <( OS OS u ,; ,; ,; ~ ~ c '" '" '" c. c. C. ::> ::> ::> ~ iD iD ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ (J) ~ ~ ~ 0 <( ;;: .2 .2 0 0 ~ ~ 'E ~. 0 0 0 '" > ~ ~ ~ '" r " -a; .c ~ Iii ~ E j ~ '" '" (J) (J) (J) 0 (I) " ., .c € .c J: :g ~ 'is. C " " (I) .~ .2 0 0 0 ,;; ,;; ;g @ z z z c. C. .0 0 ~ ~ -a; -a; .2> ~ '" 0> J: J: iil (J) -' '" '" 235 - e Gl E c.. o !l! Gl II) C U e e Gl as ca "- .a-o ...ll.e: ;:)'tl'tl olISGl ellllll) e:2 0 .- "0 c.. II) III 0 See: :1:0_ _00 o C el -ll.e E:U= Gl II) E :::i 1:: III c.. Gl C c4 ;:) ~ z: ~ .. o 0 .. .. ~ ~ .. o .. 8 '" " ... '6 :J " 0 ~ u. f/l iii c:n '" l: <( ;;! 0 '6 Cl UJ ;: ~ l: lD Cl ::; D- b :J Cl lI) 0 0 u.. u UJ :c :c ~ II) - c: GlGI '" _E li! :!::::.c " tai~ " ~ " 5 " -g~ Q. "., ~ 15 00 ~ > -.- ~u 'O'!!. ....c Q.O i:l -c 110; '[8 Q.....I ~ E " II: - ~ Cl ~ ~ " '2 " lI) .., :g D- " 1iiE =8 "''' Q)T .- " ,,- "" ,,~ ",,, ""8 ~ E . "2'0 I/J ,,""9, "'''il> :t:::3:c o.Q(ij 9-0 "g ,,- 0. 0"", C:=:.c -gel ""." g~:g ,,~'" 5. 0-; -"" 8= " -~~ ~eQ '" 0. ~ .:2E~ oll (; gui ~8 E€ ,g,s .-'" :t::o ~.~ "'- '6& 235 iii'll :g~ 0;: "" .- " 0:2 ce .S::; ~~ ~t: ~" ,,0. I'K ~ .... ~ ~ ~ $ .$ ~ ~ " " .!!I 0 (fJ i c. E 8 c " E E " '" ~ ~ Cl lD @ .. 0 0 t3 z Z ...J ~. lI) Cl ;;: 6 ~ > gJ I a; '" E ~ o " :c '" " 0 -5 -6 0. 0. Q) Qi :I: :I: ... " - " '" i- :9- '8 '5 ~ iii :g -g g W (,/) -l r:: r:: r:: r:: ~ 8 8 ~ "i-i-i- &;0 c: c: c: C ::l ::l ::l 8888 CO) <0 C\l ...... Ci Ci Ci Ci co co III m 8 8 8 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ " " f.' t!:;!:;u 2J& 5i!: 000 CS:~6969 <Xi "' ~ <Xi "' o '" III ~ '" " ::J '0 " 0 ~ l/) u. Cl l;; .c: - c ..: ..J 0 C '6 Cl w ;: ~ CI) C III Cl ~ a. 0; E ::J 0 (fJ 0 ~ c. u.. u W I I 0 ~ III CI) III 1: c - "' U III C C C CI) ~E " III III .- .:t::~ E .c a:: 0 ~~ ~ .. .. a.. ~ -g 'CD. 0. ~ 'C oE g - CI) 00 ~ "' Cl~ Ill' >cC.l " 0 .;:;~ " ~ C= C. (fJ ~ 'iii 0 C-C " e * '"" ~ III ==.2 0 .Q 0 C a.. Cj ;: '" :c :I: 0 0 ~ - gj a. 0 0 ::1- .... - :l:0 '" 0 C Cl - a.. c c 0 ;;::; CI) III E .- g! -I 1:: " gQ)S l'lI 5 eg&5 c. .\1 ~ ~" E CI) !Ii 0", " C :ce '!l -'5 > Q)3:c2 a c.. '0 00_a. ~ E os: ~1aOE -g.- ".- nscn"'E-g .- Ql'- ~'Ou.i:=' ~ l!l - 8,- 'C ai 5i"S; " 0aiC:Q) ~ "0; " mE"' E 'i3~'i3~ E ~5~8 i 0... ... c ~l!'S . ="S; 0)'- . ~ns1?6 c ~ii~H 0_._ ~.2 g Q) Q) gy . 0> 00. -g gJ._ ~ C\l Oi: Q. " g.c: '0:: B =,~gQ)" 0;: '" ~~&i.E:O 0;:: u :g ~~3~~ ~g~~lXl. ~~ .~ ~g~$C\j 0 ~ ai.Q _" 1,j -" - t; ~ .t::CCIl.t:: "'~- :t::'il i!' 0"'-8- --Ql'" e 0.. CD.! '0 ~ ~~i?!i ~> ~ ~ E 0'- c: ...- U .- -::€., "ffi E ui-:S C.ll) 2 QqgOBi Co Q).;::.s 0 .!!.III ., 1n :O.-.2:'.t:: 0 ~et1Q5g 0'- g i!' S:!:;:.:: Cl'- G) c."C m= ~..a Q; E e"g gJ"q) ai F.E'15 ~.~ GoO I 0.._ O"C (f.l 25 -C l)- ill- eS Go...l ~ <Xl f)l - l!! I 0 ;:: 0 ;; i 1ii ~ 0 t: " S .Q (fJ ;; c. E 0 U C " E E ~ "' 0 Cl Cl III 0; ... 0 0 8 t; z Z ..J ~ Co. ii- '" 0 " ~ <( 8 6 Co' > '" "' "' I c; " Q; .c: III E j c 8 0 " " -;;;- I "' ~ '5. " ~ " 0 .~ 0 5 5 :c - 0. 0. :Q .c ~ t3 a; a; ~ I I iij '" ,13 7 2: 0 0 0 (5tR-tR-tR- o ~ o ~ o ~ - c G) E c. o ~ G) III o ti C C G) co co -- .a-o .. l1. .. ::)'Cl1. ...G)'C --G) ",calli c:5!o .- '0 c. III III 0 5cQ: :1:0_ _00 00 '" -l1.C Co .- G) Ui E .- 1:: ...J ca C. G) o <4 ::) III ~ Cl e ::::J '6 e 0 ~ III u. en i;; .c C <( ~ 5 '6 Cl w ;;: C '" Cl :;; a. D ! ::::J 0 '" 0 0 ll. () W I I .... III <;; - C :e GIG> " " _E 'in :!::~ " tai~ a: '" 'CD. e :::> oE d> ()o C> J!l )(U e '" ~~ iij :::> .c Cl ., e ::Eo t; ~ 'in ~ C:t:: a: '" 0 ::l~ <( d I ;! .... 0 ::J:U '" ... c ~ ~.2 'i: a ? O'C a. "i: u 1': 'iUl " -~ E ~GI ~ 1-> ., 0. -.- E lil'tl ._ G> " e:c E 0 a.O I Cl e 'in ~ o I '" d> '0 .5 IV IV a;:g cDIVEO~~ i5. Q) 0) IV 1ii c: 0 0 :o=gE~ en --:o;:::o::..cc '3 Ul 0 - :::::I Q) _ .Ul 'C ... E Kl go lii~ .'8.~ ~.~S 'OO"'CCQ)gE~C1lg.e:! e., 0., .$.Q l!! E"in '0 0-5 (..) ~ 1'0- :::::IC::l ~o ~~::ogr.8oaseOYE .- 0'0'0 iii c.r::.,.r::. c.... E ~ 0 o.=.~_ 3_ o~" ~ E E a ~ 0 ~ ~ ~~ 3 ~ ~-'OQ)'O-C:oco;t:o , 0) . C:';:;>5-g ctI-"5:fi c: == .5.:l1::t'lIc2a1EKl.S::!cuO,Q (/)g~oQ.' Q).-'t::..cCll.... giii.Q.~ .~~.s!~.gj.E ~ g>=ij ~.~ ;.:ca t:: ci . -a ~ 'x '(ij ... '5. 5 Q) Q) 8.:2 ~ E ,2 Q)::I.EE-E::a.~cQ)~ Q) 2 OlCU,f;! Q) 0 0 c1)J!Lc-g .c_ e~ Cl""'-8 - Q).5..c Q)x.5 c 3 '(ij "3: 15:0 ~j::'Q)~.Ci.i g l{j.:.:: C) 5-e,g cnEB 0 i5 E... g.~ en :oJ 0 ...'0 8 IV o..c 0 IVt5=J2 ctS:s::.....- 0_ Q)J:: >. 0 21'O:a~iC:a;(/)Q).5g>~..c Q) >>{g Q) .0 ~ 'E ~ E Q) 'en e :g (f)::....rn '-o~8E~0.~ cEo:::::l+(I) 0 0 8~1ij,g~m.=.s.5,g,g.5..c c -0 1l= or! ..0 a....J o 8 g '" - ~ g ~ ~ iti .$ 15 ~ 0 " e ., 0 <ii ~ Q. E 8 I!? " ,,~ e ;:0 cnctl O.1!J :?:c Q) .... "Ee '6-E.l2' .~~e =oo'O~ ~8'0l.~~- g c..... o .....,o.z- i.-.2 01 go..fij.s:-g-Ece .....Ill E<<lg!e~~ ~~8 <<l5.~~c,= ,: ~ U)._ III ..... C o !i g;2 .~ '0 0...> '5 o.2wt-c U) ~otl -='o.'O>Qj clll-8g5i~g. ,g E g.LO~.2 -;;.~ ca ca ~Ecd~ffi:;~~fij ~ ~ U) 0 a: 0 ..... 2!-S2 ~:gfij~U) ~(ijc: l1l E.Q =' i:- c 3:.2 <D ~oo c: J!a Q.2 CO) ~ ~ .s c Q)~ffi Q).~LO o.~ U) <tI .....:;.o--.:(U) ~>- Cl "'-0" ,g=E8.1;'~",,-"e c Q)~U)..... !3J!! i Q) ~(ij ~ =',!? "" ~ Cl-o"'''''.2l'' .>o,i>> i>>.>oo~_ ~ e c Q.; E e c.o:s;..c a..moo Q) a..ca ca >_ o 0 z z ~. '" 0 <( is ~. > '" '" I " Q; .c E j 0 I " '" " 0 ,5 ,5 0. 0. Q; Q; I I 2Jg - I: Q) E c. o ~ Q) III C ti I: I: Q) ca ftJ-- .0-0 ...D.Q: ::lal-a all_Q) 01 III III 1::20 .- '0 c. III III 0 gl:Q: %:0_ _00 o C Cl - ^ I: I: - .- Q)OU; E .- 1:: ..J ca C. Q) C c4 ::l 2: 0 0 0 C5WWffl .0 .. ~ .0 .. o .. Ul fl 0> e: .. :g :::l 0 " en l1. Ii; I:ll .c r::: < ..J 0 '6 Cl w ;;: ~ S r::: '" Cl :;; a. :::l 0 (J) 0 0 ~ lI- () W I I S r::: ~~ "i! :t::.c. Jaj.!! " ~ .... e: ~ " 'gCl. ~ "i! oE .. " ~ ~ (.)0 " e: 0 ><8 " " .~ ~ ;; ;; .;: <C " 1;; 1;; (J) " 'I;j'C ~ 1'i 0 0 :;;0 .sa :il t: e: :E 0 l!l .2 O'l;j " '" a. (J) ;; a. d ~ ::J~ 1'i :g .... E ::1:(,) oo 8 r::: ~.2 "a::: 7i 0";: 'C (,) II.Ul ~~ 1-> -.- ~- ._~ 0'- ...c 11.0 2i -0 cs- CII- ._Ill eg II...J e: o :; 1! " o l1. 0> e: 'in " o I .c 0> " e (: " 0. o I .. " " .~ " (J) .sa :E " a. ~ ~ " 1;;E =8 ..e: 4l', '0.$ e:", ,,~ 0>" "'"8 8 E . .~u en "e:ll .."'" ",~e: o.Qa; l5. ~ "11- '0 e:_ 0".. C;E.c -goj "'",,, .~= cn :o~,g s.. 0-; -"e: 8= '" :: ~ ~ ..00 "0 Ci ~ i2.5 2l. .. '5 ~ '5 l1f en CIS CD o::)~ Q) f= \1l .$ as "OJ = Q) .]3 ~~ frl c:= >-> 0>" ~ '-'<:0> e:o."", :g 3~.Q,g vi'C~ ~'> .-0000015._.....:0:;; . ~.cc:c:c...~"ucn 5 0 ~ tlS";:; e 0)"'" ctl 8 -c=:O_~c%~.~5:2.~ ~ ~~"EOe.!::::J~Fg oc~~o~~s '0 cno:JC1)E- cg Q)~o'OS'l!'O.cQ)f"-.Z' "0'" .-:::t,cCDE Q) "S u5 UJ ClS::) t::m';:: o::J'~~cn ~e~ Ctl c.~S:E g~F catS ~ ~'E C ctI Q:lE ~ III . E '0 Q)E ~5s: to g>ge :J 'Of/) caI=c_ Oa.t::J~Q. :>00 I.Q"'8~<,""E.5 ..c. ~ 0._.$ Q) ~"E as '0 g>Q) ~~8:g ~ l1l g 5 e"O'1: ~~ ~-E>O- F~i~C1iS.82B~ l1la;8.ag>5aggC) 8"0 E e=Q'iji (lj t'lS e I'O Q) a.> ~ c a: a: a. o 0 Z Z '0 g- oo ~ <l> ~ it l: <l> .. '5. ~ 'iij ill .0 -C ~ ~ ~. (J) 0 ;;: (; ~. > .. .. J: " a; .c E j E 0 " <l> "' I .. ~ '0. "E' " 0 .~ 0 = :; :0 "a 0. 0. :2> .0 S a; a; " I I W (J) ~ C;; < () oj 0> e: o E 1l " () o .c " e: '" a: ,; " e: <l> ~ ~ e Cl ~ 2 LftJ - c: Gl E c.. o ~ Gl UI C ti c: c: Gl 1lI..!!!'O .cD... ::i'aD. ....Gl'a --Gl C)1lIU1 c::2o .- '0 c.. UI UI 0 Sc:a: :J:O_ _00 o C Cl - ^ c: c: ... .- GlOo; E :::i ~ III c.. Gl C c4 ::::I $( 0 0 0 (6www ,.: '" ~ ,.: '" o '" 1Il '" ~ c: '0 :J c: 0 ~ u. (/) l; Cl .c: C ..: ..J 0 '6 C!J w ~ ..: jg c '" C!J ::;: a. 6 :J " en 0 0 I- {!. u.. u W J: J: s C Glal _E :=s::. ~ .r!! 1l~ u8 ~~ ::Eo ci ::):!::: :I:U c ~,g ";: Q. 0";: 'i: U ~1Il E~ 1-> -.- uti .!!.al 0'- a:8 a -0 ti- al- e8 11....J ~ '" " '" ~ en i ~ ;;f "0 c: '" !l " ~ ~ lj a: '0 " '" ~ o J: ~ ~ o .... on fii '" c: '" Q. '" a. iil a. ~ '" " " '2 '" en .!.1 :0 ~ a. '" -E ~8 "'c: .!!1';j; h ",,,, "'"8 8 E . '2: '0 U) "'c:~ "''''", :!::~c: e..Q]j o._~ '0 c:_ 0",,,, C:E.c: -g15j "'?;o", 0._ C1l ~~~ ~O"; - '" c: 8= '" -~~ 'V:ioo .-... U'l '" 0._ :2.~ ~ 8 c: "'0 E'" 811 ";x .~~ 108S '" .9! ~ >--6 ~ . ~ Ctl (1)= II) (1)0-- .... E - Q) 0. . Q) CDca <U;::~a." '8 ....~; ~ ~ ui E 8>.:1fi ~.c z.Q) . .... C'OCX)S._ e ~ a. CD .- >.a: .~ ~ ..Q 1i5:Q ~!io~ g 2!"'",:S[[ a:lE 9l (1)0 <tI en ...._ .c:,"O_~.c:~ ~ II) l!::: .9! ~ 0 t- 'tii- .Q g:g{g a.J: .,..:.iij VJ'O ai= a.~..... > 1ij">(ij ~~'O!:: as 'US l2 en c C1l CD (1) E '" 8.-"0 (Uo.o ~'5<(e 'O~';(ij~e~-; fij 5i~ ~l ~c.5 .2 E"SLb E~~~ CIlit:CDe'5~_ $ 8.1" 8"- l!l E ~!lo. .-1ilUel Q)OCJjQ.(I) ~OI c: "'._ 0) 0 -o16"'g.;;:.-.c:1O "- <CO <<I==I-"<t 0. ~ I (; j::: 0 iD .& 10 ~ " 1:: c: J!l .Q en ;; a. ~ E 8 8 on R "' '" ~ - a. C aJ '" '0. '" '" .~ ~ 0. '" .0 0. 0 ~ ~ " en en >- z ~. en " ;;: 5 ~. > '" '" I '" -a; .c: E l c U> 0 '" '" J: '" ~ .0. l:' " 0 iil .Q = = :c ~ 0. 0. :g, .5 -a; -a; ~ J: J: ill en ..J 2L// SC! 0 0 0 ~t,40fR- ,.: '" @ ,.: '" o '" III fl 0> C .. jj ;, c 0 ~ III u. Cl Ii; - C <C ..J 5 r::: '6 lB w :;= ~ G) c Cl ::l: 0. ~ E ;, 0 (/) 0 0 Q. II. () W :I: :I: 0 ~ .!l G) en C - c (J GIG) r::: r::: G) _E ca ca .- ~~ !! .c n: e " ~ .... c ... c.. " ~ ::::l 'C '8~ ~ !! G) 'C '" " ~ all - G) 00 " c " Cl~ en ..u " ~ 0 .;: ~ '2' .s ;; r::: .- Q. " " ~ 'iij 0 aic (/) ~ 0. 2l 0 .51 Iil ::J en ... :IE .2 ;s ~ 0. r c 0 r::: c.. oai ~ 19 0 0 ii :E: 0 0. 0 <Xl en (.J - :J.:t::: ... C\J 0. " - 0 :E:O :g '" E g- o Q Cl 8 - c.. r::: u; r::: 0 ;: i2 G) en '" E :::i .!; ob u " " c ~ 1:: .$ G:I= w.... " 1iiE =.f; ~':i:Ulti~ 'c u ca 8, J::O 0. ~ Q. -" co co E'- Ql <'~ 2'0 CD ~ "iij ~ c4 U 0>" CGEOQ)a.co'fi~"" . E c ""8 Q)CO....0cnlll.... ~Ul 1; E w E- e:~:2~~~.> B '" ill ~ 8 i'lE " ::::l :;; 1O!3..c&.:: () :g:s >- >- (/) " '2'0 cD ~G:i~a.~ui15a3ttJg 'F "cll ",.." 8.1: QJ::::I C:-i 0_ <CCUlIJ)O'- '-0 '" "~;t C >cn'OQ)(I)g_~~ " - "'c",- 8 J:: oO(ij -0 II) ctI:;::l G:l::::l . Q) c e ~~.~ o (/) - c 0.8 _"" ~.2 ~ >. Q) Q) Q)~ -.rD co J:: C - 0. 0.. . E g:g :>,_,..., > -.::0.. () 0"", c.~~.$'c -~~o;m 'l5 C~.c: ::::).c UlCO<OctI E o.~ -g"6j f/J Q);2'0- >.>0< 'l:u '0 ...,." ~(I)~Ulll."ai'C~U,g ~. ~~ c '95cocoiaice -0) (/) ~ ~:a ~ 1l).,C 'Cg co e.!V co,g.E 0 8 '" -g::::lJ:: :;;: " co~ ~_;g'g.s 5~2? .~ 0. "'- 5 >- u oO=i!'gls..~eO.2 1-> !l! ~"c ;;.. c en ai c C Q.i a.. ~ E ~. > -- 1iiE " '" III (/) -~~ OCDQ)CD8<<l '-Q) '" r >", 'iii.c.c: 0) -32 ~E e " u_ .51 7;)00 '5 E = <5 .....~ > c ~ ~ 1ii J:: 0'- co> ;s .-... IJ) o QJ'QJ E CO Ul 0::::1 ... ~ j '" '" 0._ ...0 .s!e ~ ~.s; 2i ll: E';; G) ~ ~ ls..:I: < a. c " a.O Eo. 0. :I: " " '" ~ "c. C " 0 .~ 0 ;; :; :c @ 0. 0. :~ .c 1ii 1ii ~ :I: :I: W (/) ..J a -0 u- ..- '-8 ~ <D ;2 L/ 2. e <I a...J - c:: Gl E c.. o ~ Gl III C b c:: c:: Gl ca cu-- -ea:e ::),,11. ....Gl" --Gl Oll'lllll c:: :s! 0 .- '0 c.. III III 0 ~c::,t J:O_ _00 o C 01 -c..c:: iu'Uj E :::i 1:: l'Il c.. Gl C c4 ::) 5 .. :l o III Cl c '5 c :l u.. III E ]!~ ~.t=. 'ai~ -cCl. oE (.)0 >e() -.:~ 'lii-c :!;o ci ~= ::J:(.) c ~.2 ".: 'S. O"i: 'i: U 'illl E~ 1-> -.- ~u '_ Gl E!F 11.0 o -0 11= 'f" g 11....1 2 0 0 0 CSifliflifl o .,. ..: " w ~ al $2 ~ ~ B w :t: I '" .5; Q; u> <= " 8 E o g ~ <= '" <= ~ " ~ '" .5; Q; u> 5 8 c '" <= " ~ o 'C ~ ~ ~ o '" o .... on e " <= " !2- " c. g "- OJ f:l u> " " .~ " en .\1 :c " "- " ~g -" u><= g)", 'g~ " ~ ",,, "'"8 ~ E . .- u> ~~i u>"'" :t:::3:C Ooa; c.:: .~- '0 <=- O"u> C:!:J:: -g'Oj "'z-" 0._ en '5~0 " 0''' 0. "0 18~ffi 8;cn tiEi15 'in a..t!? :e.!:; 1l. '" gj - ~ o .,. o .,. '" <= '6 <= " ,.. l; .<: ...J 0 ~ ~ en .ra Q) en ~E .~ ~ ~,g ~ . :J ~ c.fa ~ Qfi5 06o-gQ:lc ~-eaJ~.a :0 ~ :! cOO E 11)- c:.c (tI E m~'CiiO) 0 CD:!:....R 5'0 e SC....J:Q)Q. a. Q) >...... 3:: U) J~:2Q).(ijo ~ '0 c: 10LL co.- E-.!!:! E'O_ ~ ~o..'x ffi~ ~ Q)~ecQ)Z' ~{g ~~~:~ o=-"O.2lij . '0 ~.~ Q)'ci en 8J c: c: cn:2 ......- 0 j8~e"'r=5 15 ~ j o.S . g cmE.!a5~o .g ~ctIz-~~~ .::l.(J ....s:.- (J) CD e~ ~:.g~u<(':e> ~t- a.a:l.c;: ~ 1:; o~ i:l ;::: o a.; Q) ~ ~ 1:: <= '" 0 Cii ~ c. E 8 o 0 z z ~. en o ;;: (; ~ > m J: Qi -5 8 .~ J: " " ill = = 0. 0. Q) Q) J: J: g 8 on Ii! on j Q) &: ~ ~ ~ '5. "5 .~ ~ ~8 ~ en ~"5. C Ij~ 21/3 - c::: G) E Co o ~ G) III C 1:) c::: c::: G) ca ca "- .a-o ..a...t ~"C"C ollSG) CllUlII c::::2 0 .- 0 Co III III 0 5c:::.t ::1:0_ _00 o C Cl -a..c::: c::: " .- Q).....1ij E .- ~ ..J lU Co G) C en :::i ~ :l o 1Il Cl c: ~ :l IL .s c: :!!~ :!::.c: 'ii~ 'Co. oE (,)0 >>= ::1:(,) c: ~.2 i:Q. 0'1: 'i: u ~.. E~ 1-> .. .- Uti .!!. G) 0'- ~J:J lLO c -0 11= .- .. 28 lL....I @:;: oj - .,. <( Cl w;: lDCl::<a. o U) 0 0 <.) LU I J: ~ " i5 Q. ~ .~ " U) .11 "' " a. J!] l! ~ .8 l!l 8 ~ € o Z ~ o 0 .,. .,. ~ o '" ci .. on l'! " c " Q. " 0. i6 a. 8 Pl o 1l .~ " U) .11 "' " a. " 1iiE ;;8 0C (I)', '0$ me ",,, '"E BE. .~ 'C C/) "ci 0'"" ~i:c: OO(ij a-;:'~- '0 c_ 0"0 C:::::!:.;; -g '5 .~ '"""" 0._ VI :5~,g " 0-- C. "0 - "e: !'l;; '" 15"0 ~1;5 'Uj a.t!? .:2.!; 1t '" M @ oj .,. o .,. ..J ~ o I- '" c 'g " "- Ii; 5 g o I- "" 10 (/J ~C3< 'C.r:: n:I ._ al 0 c:-_ Co '"E~ "~:Sgj; ~e(l).!!1=EEl:: 08''"''''''8,"0 .2:>a01-~ g ~ ~UlEUl_Q)Og .- Q) as Q) c,c Ou 5.0 o~ Q.lt- '5 E~e.-E(jc:,g E~~~~o~g 8 c: 0"0 OJ: _ co (tl'::; C al Z <'1St[ al E ~ ca Q)'C"'O R .~::I ~ lfi ~ c:.! ~ Q)~ c: f/)_ co ctI.;:: ~Qt'G~'58~'2 e1u 5o'-'.c: f/) Q) .8" '" - '" ".- c: '-_ctl.c(f.lcQ) .!!~.~5C1Q)C1lC,) 8---'-"15E c: ai ca e'C -e'~ o Ul Q).r::;,,;;:: (!J.- e: '" '" - - ~ c.u ~c"al"O,"" .9 ~~=~ ~o8 €~'s:~::)org~ . OO'oo'OEo.....o Z--", c !'l'~ .C') III 3 ~:o 8 :s ~ 1ij ~ f=.~.i~.~()f/)J:CJ) ~ I ~ 0 ~ ~ t: c J!l 0 (/) :a; 0. E 8 c: " " ;g E ;: E ~ "" 'c Cl " E 1ii E 0 0 g 8 Z Z ..J ",. U) 0 ;;: 5 ",. > 0 0 J: " Q; .c: ~ ~ E - " " 0 :I: 0 ~ '0. 8' " 0 .~ ;; ;; :c ~ c. c. :2> .c g Q; Q; " :I: :I: W U) ..J ;JLjLj - r:: CIl E c. o ~ CIl CIl o () r:: r:: CIl ca ca "- .a-O ..c..a: ::l"g"O all'lijCll Cl "0 CIl r:: .- 0 .- 0 c. CIl CIl 0 5r::a: J:o... ...()o 00 Cl -c..r:: r:: (.) .- CIl iii E .- 1:: ...J [ CIl o ~ ::l I/) G/ t! ::::I o CIl Cl c '6 c ::::I u.. s C CilG/ _E :t::.c ~:! 'tic. oE UO )(1.1 'c Jl 1;j~ :::;;0 0'; ::I:=: ::r:u c ~.2 "t: c. 0";: ;:1.1 ~I/) -c!l :=:Cil 1-> -.- 1.1- .!!!.~ 0'- ~.c 11.0 is -0 ti- G/- 28 11...1 ., '" ~ o :I: Ii; '" '" q: C o 1: o Z ~ S( 0 0 0 C:Sffl~~ .0 ., <( Cl w;: '" Cl ::;: a. o Ul 0 0 U LLJ :I: I .g II '" I 1;; Ec ~.Q .~~ a:., <('" ",@ ~a. Ii; '" 15 ~ ~ ...J ~ '6' N o '" d .... oo ~ '0 {f!. .II :g a. '" CQ)", as1tjc 'E.!; ~ ~.e~ eQ)1a Q.", oJ> ~lij.c o -'" ._ fJ) as '6 B~ 6!5.S:? u~:o 0>- ~ c.5 a. .~ ~~ 0;- "''''0 CD .Q):: iDS ~"'c ~C., :J ~.~ ",,,,- ~g>~ .0", ~.& c: . .- as 0 QJ Sc:2(ij '>'E-g~ ~~8~ ~ .0 ., o ., 0> C 'i5 5 "- Ii; '" 15 S ~ i I .! iD '" 1ii o 0 1: C ~ i c. E 8 ., , > C'- o~ - 1:___1l o Q) .....- Z (1)= ~a; ~.gY-a= -.2_.,~ oge;;:~ C'- 0-a.t3 .2 ~g.9 as -E"''''~ e c:'CaLti .9m.Qc>'(ij en .::dG as:6 Q) e'>.~C"3 >- gt;'6~EQ .9 as 0 c as "5. .~i E e.~ 01 .r:. fJ) .....s: U) c '" 8..2 C'- 'C !ijoli;Q)~.g ~xQ) aQ. CD:;:>.~ .- '0 as._ (G11icE~"C 2: "'aJe-o 5 Q):::::Jc_ _ m:E~e'5i ... '-:::l U) > 0.<0000,- Q:l,CE:::lQ)B ,r::..S2QJ,;:t:Q) t-u..'CfI)Q).... o 0 z z .... Ul o <( is ~ > m ~ Q; '" E j o ., :I: '" ., 0 :; :; %% :I: :I: E ., E E ., '" 1; ., Cl ~ ~ i E ., '" ~"o. C :c '.o~ ~ :g, ..... ~ [j (I) -J 0> ~ C; <( u a C o E 1l ~ u o '" " C t2 oj ~ C ~ ~ C .~ w :B ;:: ;<'-/5 - I: 41 E Do o ~ 41 III C - U I: I: 41 l'G..!!!"o .ell.... :i-cQ. olI.!'g Cll'G1Il 1::20 .-"0 Do III III 0 ::II:&: o 0 :1:00 - o C Cl -Il.l: I: " .- CD""'';) E .- t: ... III Do 41 C en :) 1Il GI U .. :l o en en c '6 c :l u.. III C GlGI _E ~~ Iij~ 'Co.. oE ug )(u 'i:ct 'l;i<:! ::Eo ci ::;):t: J:U c ~.!:! -.:0. 0'- .t: t; l~ =GI 1-> 1j= .!!.lil 0'- ...0 ll.O a -0 lli '2"8 1l...J s<: 0 0 0 (SEll}f09-(fl o '" <( (!) w ~ CD Cl :E a.. B ffi ~ ~ ~ E " "C '8j a: '" ::> d> C> c: Cii .0 ~ a: <( ... E l!! ~ Q. " " c: i!! ~ ~ J c: o ~ "C c: " & l!! " E '5 5 @ ..J ~ ~ ell R on l!l '" ::> 0> c: 'in " o :r g ~ ~ " 0; E i! C: o ~ al " z .. .~ lJ) >- ~ " :Eo> cu :.s; .~=~ o.o>~ ~c:., .9~~ ~'2l~ .S:2 co'> 2: c: e "00. rn.~ CD a!Q.2 :o:l.c:t: l!l 0." =E~~ .0"8.0 Jg.c :;:; ~ j g-~ ~Ul(J) Co gj.~ ,:. 8. \UJ(ji;::Cfl 1l"3~al ell 0.- Q) c: 8.~ c: CD "(ij_ "OfI)....g! 'S"5l;; lil eQ)Ca. I1.Cctl<n 8 @ o '" o '" 0> c: 'i5 5 "- Ii; J:: o g {2 al <( ._~ 55 u %:: R C\l (If ctl {} 0 CI) 2=-0 C E 08-Ec.!a eSO -....c:OQ)'OQ; c.::: S CD ~J:: Q.CV a.Q)E"-O 0> c:~_ -,. c: l!! g 8.~ B'~~!2.,;'g ~ " 0 'E- 1ii " "'0 15 <2 .- eCO 00..... >.(1) l! 0 ;: ah: E ~.o ~ E Q)O.Qa..~ctlf.I)"C e ;".5 Q) "_ o:!:: Q) ~ ClI {} Q).o Q) CD U)"'O.... 0 era rn E "E'5'>.~ 0. Q)....16 R ~::IC\I eel) (/J 2'~_ c:O E_ Q.C\1 Q) Q)oQ).- '~orn""> ~ ~ Hld~~~ -g.Q.S;~ o~'~:B~~ ctl....C1lCCt-ctlctlQ)._ . ....Owco'- E -.~m o,o'6Ei!? .!aNoo .S ~i C1l Q)._ ctlt= ~ a:l ~ E.2 E"C alJ:: -.(1) 0 - -0 (f) ~ o.j . c: :E rn oc:gmg~ .~2""'o ~ctl~(ij'-8:t:.c<<l "Z' :~ ~ a> Q).~ .....S ~-g~ Q) >'-~.c l!"O....::I ::1M.;;:: ~ ~ 2:S e ai 8.2 ~ SJ ~ ~ g 0 ~ ;::: 0 a; a; 15 ~ 0 t: c: ., .2 Iii a; 0. E 8 o 0 Z Z g ~ d .... on " .~ ~ 0:: ;: ~ ~ -a 5 j ~ c1l 8 ~. lJ) 0 ;;' (; ~. > ~ ~ :I: " 0; J:: E j E 0 " " " :r ~ ~ '0. "E' " 0 .~ 0 0; 0; ;g ~ 0. 0. .2' .0 0; 0; " :r :r W lJ) ...J 2 Lj0 - C GI E Q. o ~ GI Ul C - u c C GI III .!!! '0' .ca.... ::i"Ca.. ....GI"C --GI C)IllUl c:2 0 .- '0 Q. Ul Ul 0 5cQ: J:O_ _(,)0 o C C) -a..c i(,):;j E :::i 1:: III Q. GI C c4 :::) )( 000 i1)t.9t.9tI'T .; '" 8 "' .; '" o '" Ul 21 '" c ... '6 :> c 0 " lJ) "- Ii; en .c C <{ ..J 5 '6 Cl w ~ ~ ~ C lD Cl ::; a. :> 0 '" 0 0 IL () w J: J: Ul - C ]!~ ~.c .... ~.!!! ~ ~ "Cc. .. e 0 ~ oE Ql ;::: 00 U Ql 0 '2 c ><8 Ql ;; ;; Ql ~ .;: c( '" 1ii 1ii Qi-c <; ~ Ql " " '2 i5. 1:: c ::;; .S! '" 0 &l .!!l .2 OQi '" '" a. '" a; <{ 0 12 i5. ::I:::: :g .... E ::1:0 "' "' 8 c ~.S! ".: 0. O'C: ".: u 1~ ='il 1-> -.- ilcs ._0Il 0:0 .to c -0 cs- 0Il- '28 11....1 c o ;e S z ~ .2 c Ql '" .c j Q.) -goO) -5 CtI.z-~ oQ) ui'g~=o :BE; <<i.gg.-g:a ::10.. -6Q.Q)Ctl5. Q.e "S1tl.c en= -g'-R~'6 is; 5 CtI ctI~O'&->Ulg UlCOQ)t;jeQ5~ al Q).~ E"V,j a.a.~- ~ ~~ 8:2.5 ~i .sd~Q)'= .(dom :C>"'Q'-'2..coQ) :.I~O~ct;.5u ~ 0) E 0 i.!!! ~ ~ -.~~::og~Q)m .e;;;;ctI.E:O~Q)~.... cQ)''O~aI'8cn.a ~g~~.cQ)Eailg Q) CtI- Q) 0'0 ... :>..c c vi.s::.'~ C u.i t;j e ai"Q;>2; CD 1'0'0'0 a. - (S c: CD I Q) c: EO=€CtI~~Q)aI '-;'0.8 R'5,Q.::rn ~ Q).i?:' e a..... to.!!:!. "5 ~:: -5,.Q c:.E'g ~ e"u ~'Cii 5i oJ!! a.al n...I!! 0-1:: en c= (1)_ c .Q 1ii " c 1'1 "- 1? Ql E {j o .. ~ ~ a. <; '2 '" '" ... 8 ~ " '" C -a,a. ~ca.~'O'> . ctIlG~J!!tilfl gm S'i!Ctlu () E ~Q.11 g g8 ~,,~.. ~~~~~~ [[C\lQ)cCtSQ) Q) ~ E :::l~'~ =as~&<> Ea.....eUctl e~J2Q) RE -a..!!?E~e c.i?;>ctl'-$l- 2'5 Q)-o c 0) en;; eo 0.5 .- 00 u.."C E call) >. . c alQ)C\l..o~.2 o,F<6i ~ E o T""u.....ct1 0...;'0.5.3.... CD eo.... Cl 5E<tla.~e .- Ql'" ... a. :t::UQ)tI)Q)tI) S... 'E~(j) ~ c.Q ~'S:(\J'Q) ~Iii~li[;;[rl t-(f.)....asco... o 0 z .z ('0. '" " ::;: <; ~ > :fi I -a; .c E j o Ql J: .. Ql 0 -= :5 ~~ J: J: e 8 "' f2 "' Ql ~ Q) ~ ~ Iii l:- '5. Oc .iij ~ ~ g '" () - ~ Cil ~:~ ~ ;g ~ 'N .23'.g 0 w en ...J 2'17 - C GI E Q. o ! c ~ c c ~ ca ca -- ..c-o ... l1. ... ::I'Cl1. .....GI'C --GI C)I1lIll C!! 0 "iij '0 g. ::J III ... OCl1. :1:0_ _00 o c C) C 0l1. .5 GI Ui E .- 1:: ..J III Q. GI C en ::i en ~ :l o Ul Cll C ;:; C :l u.. J!l c ]!~ ~~ 'Cc. oE 00 oc() -() ii~ ~o ci =-:t:: ::1:0 c ~.2 -;:0. 0'- a:::u ~en E~ 1-> -.- ()- .!!!.g 0'- ....c 0.0 c -0 'S- al- es o....J ~~~~ ,,; ." 0<: Cl w;: ~ ~ ~ & U W I I '" " '" ::> 8. en II '" ::> ~ ~ ~ " ~ Cl ~ Ii; 1;j Cii ~ 'e- a. "' 8 :@: 1\j d ... "' !Ii " c: " Q. " c. iil a. iil '" '" " o '/: " en .2 :c ::> a. " aiE ~8 "'c: 13)', 'uS! c:'" ,,- ~~ BE. '2'0 U) "c:ll "''''" ~~c e_~ o._~ '0 c:_ 0"", c:= .c -g-;;: ",os .2~~ :c!,g ::> <T- o. "C ]q"C: 0: -5 to -!I'" 005 .-.... (I) '" 0._ ~~8. g ~ ,,; ." o ." ..J 0<: o t- '" c: '6 c: ::> U. Ii; .c: 15 ]j ~ o Oil c:. Rf/) ttI '" ~ 5 g':E 0<: E ai"'E'" =t-<..10 Q) Q.Q:j.S: (ij 3l . _~ Q)-'E cn-g.u siE 0> g;5ct1~oaoi~:g Q)'j" - .5cOQ)Q)c (5 cnc: ~rn:';:::; c....:::::l ->~ Q).!!J Q)'C 0 cn.,g!- "C"EoEc:.c:"'<..1E c ~ (I) I/) -J:: <<I,.: 0) "ttI asE~iU~~C\J~~~ 3~<<lEO~e51~"" ttI~.J:: <<J t1):::::l Q) C a. iQ 0. ~ ~~ j~ 8 S .~ - Q) Q) 0.'> 0. . Q) ~~ "''' ",2"~::>q 16 x ";"'C:"oeo.- lJl E' o.t- '$.D a. 0>1U ~ e..c.o"0 '5v:i cue U)oeQ)C;'C;Q) ",,,,""'- ."''''''00 .- oai" ""''---8 "'- lD...."o ffi-:::::l ttI U):::::l o ~O)le~ m c::.s_:2 g (ij.Q.~ ~ ~ gJ~:~.!!lt-'5 "E "'" ~"50i~21""...: Z. W" ~.>::>o._>_" '5'>-c~ )(0.."0'-""";:: ....e,ocoeQ))(Cu....co a.a.<<l0a!U)Q)tt1Ct1O) > ~~ ~ o ;::: o CD Q.i ~ ~ t: c: l!l .Q en a; c. E 8 o 0 z z ",. gs ;;: 6 ~ > :g :E a; ~ ~ .~ :J: " " l3 -5 S 0. 0. Q) Q) :J: :J: @ R '" " .~ a: 5i II '5. ~ ":d 5- 15 0. ::> ::> en en E " .. ~:9- g ;g 16 ~ ~ ~ 0 w en ..J 2tjS S< 0 0 0 ~0fR-0 cO .. ~ cO .. o .. (I) CD '" <> e: .. '6 ::J e: 0 ~ (/J 11. Cl :;; .c: - c:: <( -' 0 s:: '6 Cl w ~ ~ 19 Gl c:: to Cl :; 0. E ::J 0 (J) 0 ~ {: Co u. () W I 0 ~ (I) Gl Ul - C - c:: u CD s:: s:: Q) ~E III III .- :!::.J:: !! .c ii: 0 'ai~ '" ... e: ~ I ... c.. '" :::;) 'C '8~ ~ ~ oil Gl 'C '" !! - Q) 00 '" '" Cl~ Ul >< <> " e: 0 -<> 'i: '" ;; ;; s:: .- ll~ '" ~ .- '0 Co (J) ~ 1ii 1ii Ul Ul 0 .\1 '" 0 0 :Eo c. ::::s s:: ... :c ~ :il t:: e: c.. oi ~ s 0 o 0 0. 0 0. (J) :a; :I:() - =>:t: 0 c. 0 :g .... <3' - :Z:0 '" ... E g- O C Cl 8 '" - c.. s:: 0 s:: () :;:; .... Gl Ul '" E ::i ." '" '" "'''' ~ 1:: 1iiE !e III 109 1U ~= g ~ "- Co ",e: c: (!l.o -.- " Gl W"I ~~~H '" '" 'o.! '" C '5. '" e:m 0._ "C"C .~ ~ '" ~ 1iiQ)~gfai c4 "'''' "'E c fj CD.- ~ .0 ~ 1JE :O:6E~~ 0 0 ~ R :::;) z z (J) '2:"C <Ii ~'i-g~~ ",e:al 0; ~ ","'", --: u) co: () E <( !!l ~~c ~~BS5 () '" e.Q~ .2 "'~ 8,,, .; c:: f=' 9-o~ 1ii- ~.2 Q) (ij.c l':! ~ '" e: e: _ Q. ~o a.~g e: 0",,,, 0 ot: Q. '" E ~ c:=:5 ...cn=;-g . O.~ -go .~ uS":i Q) ca g .~ U "'","", SE~-gu) ,.. ~(I) ~ (J) () cr .S;'!= en 8.~~g~ 0 E~ w '" :c~,g C1l 0 ....- U) ;;: 2 '0 '" ~o-; lDo5 Eo. " " 5 e: .....> I!! 'i: -"'e: :5 c U) l':!Ci ~ '" 8 10 '" ('0. II: -.- S '" 1l:2'in 8'E ~ '" > ~u (J) (J) -~lI! '" :t: J9 :c:;l!a.~~ '" ._CD '" .\1 1i)oo 5> (/) a. Q)'- UJ 0; 10 '" 0'- e: :c "0 a. f! e5Ef=::~ E .~ E :;; ...l2 'in ~ .'l.!; 8, 0.0 if 0. a...r::: CD o.r::: 0 '" '" " .!'l I '" ~ '5. C ~ '" 0 .~ 0 10 10 ;g ~ ~ Q. Q. ",.0 0; 0; = ::l I I W (J) C -0 -g= _Ill [;; 2Lf9 e8 ~ D..... ~ ~ '" c ::J 'g 0 " III u. CI ~ .c - C <{ ..J 0 l:: '6 Cl w ;: ~ g Q) C ID Cl ::; a. E ::J Cl <J) 0 0 {:. IL U W :I: :I: c.. 0 ~ II) l/) 1: c - () Gl ~ l:: l:: Q) III III .- :;::;~ .c Q. 0 ~~ ... ... Q. ::::l 't:l 'CD. U> ~ Q) 't:l oE " ciS - Q) (.)0 " " .~ c Cl~ l/) lC U " " 12- 0 'l:~ <J) l:: .- c.. (; " "iii 0 0 'lii"i! '2 :e c. :J l/) ... :::!io " 0 iil 0 l:: a.. oj <J) '" a. :E: 0 - ='~ <{ R :il - (.) 0 :J:(.) ~ '" '" 0 C Cl - a.. l:: l:: (.) :;::; .,. Q) l/) '2 E ::J l " E 1:: " -go CI.l -~ E ~ .. "",,:g CCllCl) 8 "U> u CD t/fg:a=.S:? .~ ~ E U) tU Q) .-> -'c:J - --"0'- 0) C :Ce ~:::IO""-g.g 'O(i)CQ)c :::Il.c.. "Cc.Q)(t'la. o ~ ltl.o 0 E ep':>g= (1)_ '-"O..J~E ~ '0-- -- c'iij ffiC~Q)ctl C -E"O !Ie (I)<<$ecng ::::l ctIJ1oc_ ~o t)~a.'~O UJ c: 0"01;; 0 - m d:l.~ E"ii) o.8.~ ~".Q '" e ~E"8~E".- c" .c ;!::: > . 0 .. C - '- E-fil 0::: Q) g> c:: oe~c 1ij f/) ='5 Q)': . J:: 8 (I) - fl~'a;&I c .ccE~ll-c" Q).- <U.c ~.!2 :::l Q) 0..(1).- g :0 ~15=o Co E c.. CD cb -E!-a"'~~ 00> oB'--a:l Oi: Q. ~ -.5"0--;: gcuQ)u) ocfl_u-' O'i: ~~ffi.e'5Q)Q)5f!? ;:O:::lt'l:lQ)15 't; U C Q) '''0 C 5P'8 en :J co Oli c.r. ~~ .~ ~g~~~Q)EaEg Q) c:: .Q_ E " U> -'-'Oo.s:::.t: Q) af- .Q) 0 J::: m~CEOla:l <J) E ~"2.5 (l)S'~-g en (I) ....gas :::Ie. =Gl c ~ " -"o~ " ....Q)Q)8"CQ)a:lj"C =';~-g.E c. - :ij U> '" c 1-> N EO=-e _ IDal 1l:;::; E .--- l;OC ~E:StU;m u a. Q.l:gO.8ee-;:(ij,g? ~ e ill~:C.Q ._~ (; (; 'C'-~.t=. 0 o..o.~;t: -g>~..1;;" '2 os: := = 0)'- C: - = 0'- '2 e'i3~'a;5io.& &l e .... ~ Q) a.~ ...c " " a.. a..... J:: a.O <J) <J) a..~o-cU)C::=(I)_ S( 0 0 0 (S64Eftfh <D - .. ~ <D - o .. .. ~ ~ ~ ~ CD Q) ~ ~ t:: c J!I .2 en ;; c. E 8 o 0 z z E " E E !!I '" o " Cl U> ]ii ~ .9 ~ 25 -0 ;;- Gliii 2'8 a...l ~. en Cl ::;: (; ~. > U> U> X " a; .. E 'j; ..J 0 <= .. " " :I: :g ~ '0. '2' " 'g 0 .. .. ;Q ~ c. c. .g) ls S a; a; " :I: :I: W '" '" 8 o - - o f:! 0; <{ u .. '" c o E g u o .c " c .. II: J " c ::; " U> .. ID 8 '" - ;Z5() $( 0 0 0 (3 fA. 069 !::i '" ~ !::i '" o '" II '" e <= '6 ::::I <= 0 ~ CIl u. 01 Ii; .r: - C <( ...J 0 l: '6 g w ;;: ~ ~ Gl c Cl ::l: 0- E ::::I C '" 0 0 IL U W J: J: Q. 0 Gi > rn GI III - C - c u 'il ~ l: l: Gl III III .- E.c .c a:: 0 ~ .!! ... ~ I ... a. ::::I 'tl 'gc. " Gl i oE " ~ all - (JO ~ Cl~ III )(u -6 0 " .. 0 _u "" u. g ;; l: .- Q. 1il~ ~ .\1 ~ 'iii 0 0 ~ :c 2l ~ III ... :::iE.51 '0 5 " t: <= C a. Cii 0- S 0 0 O'lij OJ 8 :s; :E: 0 - ::J:::: ...J R '" 0 0 a gj Ci - ::J:(J '" E 0 C Cl 8 - a. l: l: 0 - Gl III E :::i c: 1:: g .; " III " ~ 08 E Q. j; E GI o ~ uiJ:J -€ ~ " - -:l ~.8 b C :De ~IJ) :::I a. "'C Q) E.r: Cl lD ~ ~.e Cll:~ g "'" ~ '" c en ~"O as ~.~ 0 0 t; ::::I a:l_ .5 Q) 0._ Z Z tnliig(l):; "" :B E"' E ~ ::e> Ca€5*8Wui ~S o......c Q) <=ll ="> (1)'- ':; t'lS; c .g~"8nu .=~ ~.51 ~CJE.9 is ~" ~ ~ ~ ;::: "i: 'S. ,,<7 8 - .r::. '0 .... 0 II) ~<= O't: S~~.E:o-g 0';;; ".: u &iB~-g~a3 .5~ <-. i- i- i- i- ~rn '0- '" '" Ecoct1J::Cf.I .\; ~ <= <= <= <= <= Q) <<1- ~ Q).~ C " ~ ~ " _8 :g ~ ~ " < 8 8 8 8 i>f'\;jj;;;; "''0 ='il o.Q)Q) 'Co ".- - .r:" 5 1-> Cl "g Eg'" lijS ;ll <-. > OJ '" .... '" ll"" "" .- - 0 " c; c; l u. "!l~.8 ef'B !'Il;l " i: c; g ._lil .\1 " lD lD lD ~ E = -a.2 5- gg. a; .r: 0'- " :g 013 a:l._ c: E ~ c: 8 .....0 '0 .5:0 8 8 8 0..0 Cii 0- a:~ 5-~ ~~ 0 " "' J: " ,ii- :fi. c ~ ~ ~ ~ " " 0 0 j; 0; = III @ <> - 0. 0. :~ .0 l3 ~ l3 t5 a; a; " J: J: W '" ...J is -0 ll= ._ II @ <Xl 28 0 ;!S/ 0..... ~ S< 0 0 0 (StR-tf.l.0 g .,. g g .,. o .,. rl '" U " .. '5 ::I " 0 " 1Il u.. Dl Ii; - c ..: ;;J, 5 c '6 Cl w :;: ~ Gl c gj Cl ::;: 0- 15 E ::I <J) 0 0 ~ u w :r :r f- a. 0 ~ _ Gl III C Q - U GI C C Gl }E III III "- =.1: .c a:: e ~~ ~ .... ... Q. i ::) 'C 'C ~~ ~ ~ 011 Gl - Gl 00 Cl~ III >eU .~ 0 0 _u ~ u.. ~ i1i c:: a. ~~ l .2 ~ "in 0 0 ~ :c III ::E.2 " :::l ... "C 5 0- " " 0 C Q. Oiij en '" '" 0 :E: 0 - ..J R ~ ili i () 0 :1= a c. '0 :%:0 "' '" E Q Cl 8 - Q. C C () i Gl E ::i c: t:: .9 al " ,qj III " ~ :c E ;: a. ;; '" E o CD ..0 " ~ ~ Gl .- > !!l ttl '5 '1" Q :oe ~m " 0 Cl " "c. ~" 1;; E en .g..~ CD:_ 8 ~ ~ E ::) i~~~: E 0 0 8 cn~gQ):S E z z 0 mE"E~ ~ Cii6~gwui 0... ... CD .9 :;:;:'S Q)': ':; c .g5i~~8.11 "' ~.2 e ~OlE.Q a.s " .~ C. .9C'C,,-~1J) " o.~ S~~.E:o-g '" .S ".: () ~ a5Q)~-g~ca ;; ". ii- <J) Egoca.J::1I) 'x 0 ~ ~~- -".91 " E~ ~ Ctl)=~ '0 :;: ~15i8"O~ 1-> ~ '<3 e2::-efa-; "''" 6 'iij .S (ij ". > -.- '" "' U- .c: u.. 'Q; ~ 0.8 eiS "''' "' ;: Glu .2 .2 :g;~..c:O::::l e~ " ._ GI " a; .c: " :c > = - 0)'- c. 0'6 i o:g 0'(3 ro._ C E c: .c: " ~~5-~mii a: .S !to :;: 0- 0 " " :r " "' ~ 'Q. "E' " 0 .~ 0 ;; ;; :c ~ c. c. :9 .c a; a; " :r :r iii <J) 2i -0 ll= _Ill ~ .... e8 ~ 2S) Do.... - r::: Gl E Q. o ~ Gl m C '0 r::: r::: Gl as ca -- ,g-o ..a..Q: ::1"0"0 all.!!Gl alllm r::: :2 0 .- '0 Q. m m 0 5r:::Q: %0_ _00 o C a Co a.. .5 Gl Ui E .- ~ ...I III Q. Gl C c4 ::I en 8 .. :J o Ul Cl c '6 c :J IL ~ GiG) _E ~J: 'ii~ ogD. oE (,)0 >cU ~~ :Eo cE ::J_ :1:(,) c ~.2 or;: D. o or;: i~ 1-> -.- ~- ._~ 0- ...c 0.0 o -0 li= e8 0....1 )l! 0 0 0 ~mwEj9. .,; '" <( Cl w ~ CD Cl ~ IS B f3 J: I '" ., .~ ., '" .Q " ., '" <( :g a ~ 8- '" " e f- o '2 &Il , 1'i :;; >- co 8 @ .,; '" o '" ..J ~ 0> " '0 " " "- Ii; 5 ~ ~ iij d ,... '" ~ " " ., !2. " 1S. ~ l1. ~ C'l '" E e ~ l1. ~ o '2 " '" .c: j Q) "Eo <I,) ~ (tl~~ .~ ~ ul~~=.g :i3e ~;CT"E:g ~a. 'Oc.cul'Oc. E Q)'>"N.s:::. 0= -g'-~E'6 cs; 6 co "$8.5- > inS! V,lC ltIrneQ5~ m Q).~ E"0 a.a.~. ~E"o<llE"._ <<lC-u<e--E16 ()oeC _ ~'~~'~"2~ g ~ ::::l<l,)o$Q.I/)'_o ~ 0) E..Q Q..9? S ~ . -.~'C...~geQ)cn j!J.- ffi.E:a Q.l Q) 5 e a5a;'"Offiar8~.f. Eg~ffi.cQ)Ew3 ~2cui~.g"O .~ oc'-~_2::cUJ o.Q).!o-g~'?i-g E.9=€cu:!::=~~<<l ';P m ~.8 ~~eQ.:: (ij.gJ ~"'''".c: 0 ,,g'!;l= e=G~'!l'~ 5~ o.'~ ll.J!!crC0C=f.n_ ~ - '" 0> " o '5 E .c: '" - gtigO) !'l "'110" E~(f.I.oa:B:O e ~'::'a1 Q) () 5 - ....~. . c c_ -C="5<:JClSe ffiiuoQ)a:(t1 t'tS~UJQ)'" .s :g.~>~:6 e rn ..J::.~ c a. ~sl-'E8s VI .~ c: aCtl C\I "3: ~ Z5~.J; u.;: _"Qi .Qog:~1U~~ C'c.c oi- ~ gJQ)(I)E-a>"s: ....en >.n:s ~<C:~ v.i .E ~~ S.20 g ~ c C \1lC,,) . . CIl 5 003:0<CCI_-O ~ E .... ts So? g't: en 1::!'l 0 ~ 0 _ 8.~-.ffi> E.-:..O rJ)Oec:-gB!~ coo >Ow ~ C "C ~"fi1n.ot)()~~ Cllffi2'iCll,g....CU ~a: Q)~~ g"~ E e ~ ~ e~a:co,~ e 0..;:: 0)0.._ U.J_ ~ .... i 0; ;::: 0 Qj Qj 1ii ~ " " " )!I 0 '" ~ 1S. E 8 o 0 z z ~. '" " ;;: o ~ > ~ J: Q; .c: E j o " I u> " 0 -6 -6 ~~ I I ~ d .... '" " ~ ~ a: ~ ~ ~ "a "~ .~ ~ ~ 8 E " '" ~~g ~ -9 ~..J~ W '" ;J53 $( 0 0 0 cs~U')~ .0 '" ~ .0 '" o '" ~ 0> c: ::I '0 0 c: en " u. Cl :;; - C <( B c:: '6 ;;! Gl Cl w ~ E c '" Cl ::;: a. t ~ ::I Cl '" 0 0 C. IL t) W J: J: I- 0 ~ .I!l Gl III 0 - C c:: () GI ~ c:: Gl III III -- EJ: .c a: 0 'i~ .. .. 11. ~ I ;:) "C '8~ all Gl "C III T!! 5 - Gl 00 .~ Cl~ III >eu " i': c: 0 0 'C .:i " " c:: .- '" ~ -- '0 c. c"C! .c: ;; ~ III III 0 S ~ " 1;; j c:: .. 20 ~ ~ i5. Cl o 0 c.. ci; g t: c: l!l 0 :J:O - ::l:= Cl R a. li 0 U') ~ (J) - J:O 0 U') i5. 00 Cl E - 11. c:: So 8 c:: 0 +:: Gl .c: c: III 0 E g ~ E ::J .c: ~ ab e~ ~ 1:: -g_l '8 - .cO~Ol III " 0(1) _ Q:lj a:sa:() c: C. .. ~.~lB € 81= <i~ 0'0 Gl .8~ .c: E u'-.c: c: "" m='ii6 (,) .~ u":as ...Jo.2 0 :::> .c:'r-=-cnC~<I)::!:Q)C .oQ '!.gs-oc:B 0>1;; "'.!." 8"-> "'Il E aa. "c.Q):iis.. "ijj C:"E~z. &l '" ~ c Q:l.2.:= c o.'5~ Q) g '0.5 Q):~~';; (1)= ~ ~ ~ '" .2 .!!l U E 8" ~ ;:) C:~E'O C<tI <<I~o.~-~~o !2 i~.s ctl.fC\l.E; a. 0 0 U)co -0 - E a.j ~ Q:l(ij.!!? ttl;:.c ~ z Z Q) E'- en .- 5-C:'-- c:ai3:.- :;;c:,"o~E,,= i~cn.cCf) 0 -Q) oeeg ::ei Z -!!l ~.!!!.c E i g al c ='S 0)'- . a:l 0 en Q)C:.c:_o_:;~_,..,..... ~.2 .gc-gi!=g~ 6.Q>:!::::a:l'C'E a:l....,a. c.Q)e (/).-0 oID~>Q)Q)g,::l80]'> "Ca. o 0) 0 fi.~ d.1 ~ -"'O! g>>'C:g~u-~<(; qj .0 - ,I:: '0:: (,) (,) ii . "Em 'oCe OC{O~Q) 0'- " U):> c: 0'- c: ~ Q) ID _'-g,c:C'tI<'tI .L':u ~ ~ "Cu U -=as-'Ol1)cv:s..... ~-g S!~a:2-g:: a.!a:::J &i CD ' '0 C 01'8 <I) ::l ~~ ! o~c:<<IaI Co l!i",i<ii:Jli.!lIl>c:l=g Co' E c: 0 <<Is::. Q) EW::J l!l '" ~~~ ui~'~"C .= en f'o. ~.g as Cii ~ It) -g ~....:.. '5 E .-ao-"O c:'O.-.c:w g......?:- ::;: ~ !!! o C:'-g- c= c: ell (I') E<o8c:'-=~- gQ) " c.Q)Q) "O(I)a:lj"O 1-> ~ ~ EO:!:: C (I) I C a:l(!).ca:l(l)o....~cn C._ B l~ '_-15€a:l.t:~~a:l .... uci~~8: Q)UQ)< a. 8'''' '" c: '" 8 '" i ~ 0 t) > '" "", B eO -lll '" ;: <( .c: 'C!l:? ~ a..... 9l.- a....:~:EttI _"OQ)'cCittl " 0'- t) S 's:i=='c.Q I .E-~= Q)C\I:g.Q ~ <<i'~-S:'c ~'E E "ijj .. ....c ::;: ~ e'u~'~~5Q) 'u ~ti'E E:!;;: Q) en e::a:~ e E 'l< 0.0 > a..~O"cenc:!:CIl~ CUctl>.ctla.o __ 0 J: " ., " 0 .. .. 0. 0. is "ijj "ijj J: J: -0 tl- 11- 'e8 '" '" 8 - D.... - 251 Subrecipient Private 570.500(c) Addresses 10033 Feron Boulevard. Rancho Cucamonga. CA 91730 Eligibility: Sub recipient Location(s) N <1J\ ~ THE CITY OF I '1~~":";'_ "",".',. .' ~ , , ''r~ - "'!,v":"~ ~.. 'h' " '~ ~ ~'.U RANCHO CUCAMONCA Staff Report FROM: BY: April 19, 2006 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Erica Darplee, Management Analyst I DATE: TO: SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE AND APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION WHICH GOVERN REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEDICA nON OF PARK LAND AND/OR PAYMENT OF FEES IN-LIEU THEREOF IN CONNECTION WITH RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISIONS OF 51 PARCELS OR GREATER Recommendation It is recommended that Council approye the first reading of Ordinance No. 751, which sets the legal requirements for the dedication of park land and establishes the formula for the payment of fees in-lieu of parkland dedication, and; In complement to the new Ordinance, it is also recommended Council approve Resolution No.EL, which determines planned park land acreage, residential land values, and average residential densities, for calculating fees collected in-lieu of parkland dedication via the Quimby Act. Further, it is recommended Council set the second reading of Ordinance No.751 for the May 3, 2006 Council meeting. Background The City's Engineering/Public Works Division is responsible for the collection and administration of various deyelopment impact fees; Park DeyelopmenUQuimby fees being one of those fees. As the entity responsible for managing these funds, it is the obligation of engineering staff to update these fees yia fee studies in order to ensure appropriate collection rates reflect current costs. ;2.5t Page 2 An Ordinance and Resolution updating Park Development dedication and in-lieu fee requirements administered by the Engineering/Public Works Division On February 1, 2006, Engineering staff presented data to the City Council on the status of updating various fees that Engineering staff collects. At that time, Council voted to accept the new changes in fee structures based on consultant studies that reflected current costs, as the Engineering fees had not been updated in 15 years. The Park Development/Quimby Fee is the last fee in this series of Development Impact Fees that has yet to be updated. Council will recall that staff had notified them at the February 1st meeting, this fee would be brought back when the Ordinance had been appropriately updated with the approyal of the City Attorney. Park Development Fees - "Quimby" In-Lieu Fee Per City Ordinance 105 (Chapter 16.32 of the Municipal Code; Resolution 91-091): "" . (the) intent of this ordinance is to provide for the development of park and recreational facilities through subdivision regulations, in an area where the need for parks has been determined." Per Resolution 91-091, "The City Council shall review and adjust ", when warranted, the cost to develop and acquire park land in Rancho Cucamonga." Staff obtained a third-party consultant, TishlerBise, to conduct a fee study that observed all of the regulations as mandated by both the State and Federal goyernment codes. This particular fee is governed by the State's Quimby Act. When acquiring parkland as a condition of deyelopment approval, the Act allows the City to require either dedication of land or payment of in-lieu fees based on the yalue of the land. The Act applies to subdivisions of more than 50 parcels. Smaller projects (50 parcels or less) will be assessed the park improyement impact fee, which includes park amenities and recreational facilities. The Quimby Act provides that a City may require residential subdiyiders to dedicate land for future parks or to pay fees in lieu of dedication. The Acts states that requirements for land dedication or in-lieu fees are to be based on a population ratio of 3.0 to 5.0 acres per thousand added residents, depending on the existing ratio. The proposed fee under consideration meets all these requirements. Summary of Study Methodology and Calculations Due to the fact that this fee has not been updated since 1991, as well as factors including the rising cost of land acquisition and construction, staff determined the Park Fees in need of a new study and an adjustment. Subsequently, TischlerBise, conducted the Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Study, attached as Exhibit "A". 257 Page 3 An Ordinance and Resolution updating Park Development dedication and in-lieu fee requirements administered by the Engineering/Public Works Division The equation utilized to calculate the new fee amount is detailed in Section B of Ordinance No._ Recommendation Staff recommends that Council approye the first reading of Ordinance No.751and Resolution No...J..jL, which will update the requirements for park land dedication and in-lieu fees for subdivision projects of 51 parcels or greater, and set the second reading for each item to be held during the May 3, 2006 Council meeting. Respectfully Submitted, l.}e(tu.ct Will~m J. O'Neil City Engineer Attachments: Exhibit "A" Ordinance No. 7 Sq Exhibit "B" Resolution No. 13/ Exhibit "C" Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Study 2S~ ORDINANCE NO. 151 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AMENDING REGULATIONS GOVERNING DEDICATION OF PARK LAND AND RELATED IN-LIEU FEES, AND AMENDING TITLE 16 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE A. Recitals (i) Government Code Section 66477 allows the City of Rancho Cucamonga to require, by ordinance, the dedication of park land or the payment of fees in lieu of such a dedication, as a condition to the approval of a tentative map or parcel map. The required ordinance must include definite standards for determining the proportion of a subdivision to be dedicated and the amount of any fee to be paid in lieu thereof. (ii) In accordance with Section 66477, the determination of required land dedication and in-lieu fees referred to in Recital (i), above, must take into account planned park acreage per 1,000 residents (between 3 and 5 acres per 1000 residents); average residential densities based on Federal Census data; and the fair market value of park land per acre. (iii) It is the intent of the City Council in adopting this Ordinance to establish a formula applicable to subdivisions of 51 or more lots, that will determine the amount of land to be dedicated for park purposes, or in-lieu fees to be paid, in accordance with Section 66477, and further, to amend Chapter 16.32 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to reflect changes in State law affecting such dedications and payments. (v) On April 19, 2006, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing concerning the park land dedication and in-lieu fee formulas established in this Ordinance. (vi) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance, are true and correct. SECTION 2. Section 16.32.020 of Chapter 16.32 of Title 16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "16.32.020 Requirements. Land or fees required under this section shall be conveyed or paid directly to the city. The city in accepting such land or funds shall develop the land or use the funds as provided in this section: A. Use of Land and Fees. The land, fees, or combination thereof are to be used only for the purpose of providing park or recreational facilities that will reasonably serve or benefit future residents of such subdivision. B. Establishment and Development Time. Any fees collected under this chapter shall be committed within five years after the payment of such fees or the issuance of building permits on one-half of the lots created by the subdivision, whichever occurs later. If such fees are not committed, they shall be distributed and paid to the then record owners of the 873785-1 I 257 subdivision in the same proportion that the size of their lot bears to the total area of all lots within the subdivision. C. Land Disposition. In the event that opportunities for better recreation facilities than those provided by the dedication materialize, the land so dedicated may be sold pursuant to state law, with the proceeds therefrom being used for suitable park and recreation facilities which serve the neighborhood in which that subdivision is located. D. Only the payment of a Park Development Impact Fee shall be required in subdivisions fifty lots or less, unless agreed otherwise by the city council and the sub divider. E. Standards for Dedication. The amount of land to be dedicated or the fees to be paid shall bear a reasonable relationship to the use of benefits of the park and recreation facilities by the future residents of the subdivision. In accordance with the procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66477(a)(2), the city council shall establish, by resolution, the standard ratio of park acres to each 1000 residents of the city. That standard ("planned park acreage") shall be between and 3 and 5 acres of parkland per 1000 residents, or within such other limits as provided by law. F. Amount of Park Fees Required. When the requirements of this code are complied with for the purpose of providing park fees, the minimum amount of fees to be paid shall be computed by using the following formula: FORMULA: NSPL / 1,000 = minimum fee WHERE: N = number of proposed dwelling units S = planned park acreage per 1,000 population as established pursuant to subsection E of this section P = population per dwelling unit on a scale and density established by City Council resolution L = fair market yalue of parkland per acre as established pursuant to subsection H of this section G. Amount of Fees or Land Required. The subdivider may pay fees in the amount computed in subsection F of this section or dedicate the amount of land which could be purchased with the fees. H. Park and Recreational Use Land Fair Market Value. The fair market value shall be determined at the time of recordation of the parcel map or final map in accordance with the following criteria: 1. The fair market value as determined by resolution of the City Council; or, 2. If the subdivider objects to such evaluation he or she may, at his or her own expense, obtain an appraisal of the property by a qualified real estate appraiser from the general area approved by the City, which appraisal may be accepted by the City Council if found reasonable. I. Combination of Park Land and Fees Required. When a combination of land dedication and in-lieu fees are required as a condition of approval, the fair market value of the land to be dedicated, as determined pursuant to subsection H of this section, and the in-lieu fees, 873785-1 2.~6 as computed under subsection F of this section, shall be of an equal value to provision of subsection F of this section applied to the entire subdivision or planned community. J. Determination of Residential Density in Subdivisions with More than One Class of Household. If a subdivision contains more than one class of household, with differing average residential densities, a separate computation using the formula in subsection F of this section shall be made for each class of household within such subdivision and the minimum fee for the separate calculations shall be added together to determine the minimum fee for the subdivision as a whole for the purpose of determining dedication requirements." SECTION 3. Section 16.32.030 of Chapter 16.32 of Title 16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "16.32.030 Procedure. The requirements of this chapter shall be met concurrent with the approval of the final parcel map, final subdivision map, or the planned community, or prior to issuance of building permits, by the provision of park land in whole or in part, the payment of a park fee, or by a combination of both as required by the City Council: A. City Option. At the time of filing tentative tract map or a minor subdivision plat for approval, the city shall determine whether dedication of property for park and recreational purposes or in-lieu of fees are necessary. If the city desires dedication, the area shall be designated on the tentative tract map when submitted. B. Action of City. At the time of the tentative tract map approval, the planning commission shall determine as part of such approval, whether to require a dedication of land within the subdivision, payment of a fee in lieu thereof, or a combination of both. C. Prerequisites for Approval of Final Map. Where dedication is offered and accepted it shall be accomplished in accordance with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act. Where fees are required the same shall be deposited with the City prior to the issuance of building permits. D. Determination. The Planning Commission shall determine whether to require land dedication, require payment of a fee in lieu thereof, or a combination of both, by consideration of the following: 1. Recreational element of the general plan; and 2. Topography, geology, access and location of land in the subdivision available for dedication; and 3. Size and shape of the subdivision and land available for subdivision. E. Park and Recreational Use Land--Credit for Private Open Space. Where private open space for park and recreational purposes is provided in a proposed subdivision, and such space is to be privately owned and maintained by the future residents of the subdivision, such areas may be credited against not more than fifty percent of the requirement of dedication and development for park and recreation purposes, as set forth in this section, or the payment of fees in lieu thereof, as set forth herein, provided the Planning Commission finds it is in the public interest to do so, and that the following standards are met: 1. That yards, court areas, setbacks and other open areas required to be maintained by the zoning and building provisions of this code shall not be included in the computation of such private open space; and 2. That the private ownership and maintenance of the open space is adequately provided for by written agreement; and 873785-1 .210/ 3. That the use of the private open space is restricted for park and recreational purposes by recorded covenants which run with the land in favor of the existing and future owners of property within the subdivision and which cannot be defeated or eliminated without the consent of the Council; and 4. That the proposed private open space is reasonably adaptable for use for park and recreational purposes, taking into consideration such factors as size, shape, topography, geology, access and location of the private open space land; and 5. That facilities proposed for the open space are in substantial accordance with the provisions of the recreation and parks element of the general plan for the city and are approyed by the Planning Commission; and 6. That the minimum open space for which credit will be considered is three acres and provides a minimum of four of the elements listed below, or a combination of such, and other recreational improvements that will meet the specific recreation park needs of the future residents of the area: Criteria List. a. Children's play apparatus; b. Family barbecue picnic area; c. Game court area; d. Swim pool with adjacent deck and ancillary facilities; e. Recreation building. The subdivider requesting consideration for private open space credit shall, as part of the submittal filing, include: i. Written request for such consideration by the planning commission; and ii. Submit detailed plans and specifications for areas and improvements within such proposed private open space. The Planning Commission shall, as an element of the review for private open space credit, solicit comments and recommendations from the Park Development Commission on all such applications. F. Credit for Private Open Space--Planned Communities. Where private open space for park and recreational purposes is provided in a planned community and portions of or all such space is to be privately owned and maintained by the future residents of the planned community or publicly dedicated and maintained by a special assessment district, credit against the requirement of dedication for park and recreational purposes, as set forth in Section 16.32.020G shall be determined through the adoption of the planned community text; provided, however, that the park standard for the planned community is the same as for any other development and that the Planning Commission finds it is in the public interest to do so, and that the standards for private open space, as set forth in Section 16.32.030E, are met. G. Common interest developments, as defined in Sections 1351 of the Civil Code, shall be eligible to receive a credit, in an amount determined by resolution of the City Council, against the amount of land required to be dedicated, or the amount of the fee imposed, pursuant to this chapter, for the value of private open space within the development which is usable for active recreational uses. This subsection shall apply only to common interest developments for which tentative maps or parcel maps are approved or conditionally approved after December 31, 1982_ The credit allowable pursuant to this subsection shall, if applied for, be in lieu of any other credit allowable under other provisions of this chapter. " 873785-1 ZiP2 SECTION 4. The City Clerk certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of ,2006. Mayor I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the _ day of , 2006, and was finally passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of , 2006, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBERS: ATTEST: City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga 873785-1 ;2t;3 RESOLUTION NO. 0 (p - 1..3) . A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING PLANNED PARK LAND ACREAGE, RESIDENTIAL LAND VALUES, AND AVERAGE RESIDENTIAL DENSITIES, FOR THE PURPOSE OF CALCULATING LAND DEDICATION AND IN-LIEU FEE REQUIREMENTS PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 16.32 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE A. Recitals (i) Chapter 16.32 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code establishes a formula to calculate required park land dedication and in-lieu fees for subdivisions, based on the following components: planned park acreage per 1,000 residents; average residential densities based on Federal Census data; and the fair market value of park land per acre, all as determined by Resolution of the City Council in accordance with Government Code Section 66477. (ii) The City Council has heretofore caused a comprehensive study to be conducted In order to determine the component values referred to in Recital (i), above. (iii) On April 19, 2006, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing concerning the planned park acreage per 1000 residents, residential densities and fair market values established herein. (iv) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows; SECTION 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution, are true and correct. SECTION 2. The City Council hereby approves and adopts that certain study dated January 16, 2006, and conducted by TischlerBise Consultants ("the Study"), including all determinations set forth therein. A full, true and correct copy the Study is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and is incorporated by reference herein. All determinations, values and densities hereinafter established are based upon the Study. SECTION 3. Utilizing the procedures in Government Code Section 66477(a)(2), the City Council hereby finds that the City of Rancho Cucamonga has an existing ratio of 3.17 acres of park land for each 1000 city residents. The public interest, convenience, health, welfare and safely require that 3.17 acres of park land for each 1000 new subdivision residents be devoted to neighborhood and community park and recreational purposes. Based upon the foregoing, the City Council hereby adopts 3.17 acres of park land property ("planned park land acreage") as the standard for calculation of park land dedication and in-lieu fee requirements pursuant to Chapter 16.32 of Title 16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. SECTION 4. The City Council hereby establishes the average cost per acre to acquire park land by land use designation, in Rancho Cucamonga, for the purpose of implementing Chapter 16.32 of the Municipal Code as follows: RC-resolution-Quimby ;ltf Zoning Value District oer Acre Verv Low Residential $ 400,000 Low Residential $ 450,000 The City utilizes these two zoning district types based upon a determination that all future park sites will be located within these residential areas. Utilizing said figures, the City Council hereby establishes the average cost of land suitable for park land as $425,000 per acre. SECTION 5. The City Council hereby establishes, based on 2000 Federal Census data, the average residential density by dwelling type for the purpose of implementing Chapter 16.32 of the Municipal Code, as follows: Single-Family Detached Single-Family Attached Duplex Multiple 3-4 Multiple 5-9 Multiple 10+ Mobile Home Nursin IAssisted Livin Avg Pop er DU 3.29 2.38 2.74 2.72 1.90 2.07 2.00 1.00 Type of Dwelling SECTION 6. The planned park acreage, average cost per acre to acquire park land, and average residential density as determined by this Resolution shall apply to subdivisions of 51 lots or greater. The terms of payment and procedures are outlined in Section 16.32.030 of Chapter 16.32 of Title 16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. The planned park acreage, land values, and densities established in this Resolution supersede and replace any such prior determinations. SECTION 6. In accordance with Government Code Section 66477(a)(2)(A)(5), the City Council hereby finds that the amount and location of land to be dedicated and/or the fees to be paid by application of the values established herein, in conjunction with the formulas established in Chapter 16.32 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, shall bear a reasonable relationship to the use of the park and recreational facilities by the future inhabitants of each affected subdivision. SECTION 7. This Resolution shall not take effect until Ordinance No. operative. SECTION 8. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. becomes PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this _ day of AYES: ,2006. NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: Mayor RC-resolution-Quimby :l~S ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a meeting of said City Council held on the _ day of , 2006. Executed this _ day of , 2006 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk RC-resolution-Quimby 21o? ATTACHMENT "A" Park Impact Fee Study Prepared for: City of Rancho Cucamotlga, California January 16, 2006 Prepared by: 1lD~lhl~~~D~ Fiscal, Economic & Planning Consultants :2.t'l City of Rancho Cucamonga. California Park Impact Fee Study - January 16, 2006 Table of Contents Table of Contents ............ ....... ................ n. ...... .........n.... ........... .................... n. .......... .......... ........ ...... ..... 2 Executive Summary .... ....... ..... .... .... ........ ......... ........ "_ _...... ..... ........................ .............. .,... .......... .... .... .... 3 LEGAL FRAMEWORK .............................................................................................................. 3 IMPACT FEE CALCULATION METHODOLOGy........................................................... 6 Parks ........ .......................................... ......................................... .................... ......................................... 8 STUDY AREA................................................................................................................................ 8 DEMAND VARIABLE AND METHODOLOGy............................................................... 8 PARKLAND - MAJOR SUBDIVISIONS ............................................................................. 10 Parkland (M'!ior Subdivisions) - LOS Analysis ........................................................................................................... 10 Parkland (Mcyor Subdivisions) - Cost Ana!Ysis............"...............................................................................................13 PARK AMENITIES.................................................................................................................... 14 Park Amenities (Minor Subdivisions and Non-Subdivirion Projects) - LOS Anajysis..................................................14 Park Amenities (Minor Subdivisions and Non-Subdivision Projects) - Cosl Anajysis ................................................... 15 RECREATIONAL FACILITIES.. ............................ ..... ....... ....... ................................ ............. 16 Recreational Facilities (Minor Subdivisions and Non-subdivision projects) - LOS Ana!Jsis...........................................16 Recreational Facilities (Minor Subdivisions and Non-subdivision projects) - Cost AnalYsis............................................ 17 PARKLAND IN-LIEU FEE..................................................................................................... 17 PARK IMPROVEMENT IMPACT FEE ............................................................................... 19 Appendix 1: Implementation and Administration.................................................................................21 ADOPTION .................................................................................................................................21 ADMINISTRATION ..................................................................................................................21 2 ;2~ g City of Rancho Cucamonga, California Park Impact Fee Study - January 16, 2006 Executive Summary The City of Rancho Cucamonga has retained TischlerBise to prepare this study to update the City's Park Impact Fees. This report documents the data, methodology, and results of the fee study. Impact fees are one-time payments used to fund system improvements needed to accommodate development. As documented in this report, the methods used to calculate impact fees in this study are intended to satisfy all legal requirements governing such fees, including provisions of the U. S. Constitution, the California Constitution, and the California Mitigation Fee Act (Government Code Sections 66000 et seq., including the Quimby Act (Government Code Section 66477). LEGAL FRAMEWORK U. S. Constitution. Like all land use regulations, development exactions, including impact fees, are subject to the Fifth Amendment prohibition on taking of private property for public use without just compensation. Both state and federal courts have recognized the imposition of impact fees on development as a legitimate form of land use regulation, provided the fees meet standards intended to protect against regulatory takings. To comply with the Fifth Amendment, development regulations must be shown to substantially advance a legitimate governmental interest. In the case of impact fees, that interest is in the protection of public health, safety, and welfare by ensuring that development is not detrimental to the quality of essential public services. There is little federal case law specifically dealing with impact fees, although other rulings on other types of exactions (e.g. land dedication requirements) are relevant. In one of the most important exaction cases, the U. S. Supreme Court found that a government agency imposing exactions on development must demonstrate an "essential nexus" between the exaction and the interest being protected (See Nol/an v. California Coastal Commission, 1987). In a more recent case (Dolan v. City ofTigard, OR, 1994), the Court ruled that an exaction also must be "roughly proportional" to the burden created by development. However, the Do/an decision appeared to set a higher standard of review for mandatory dedications of land than for monetary exactions such as impact fees. Constitutional issues related to impact fees will be discussed in more detail below. California Constitution. The California Constitution grants broad police power to local governments, including the authority to regulate land use and development. That police power is the source of authority for a wide range of regulations, including the authority to impose impact fees on development to pay for infrastructure and capital facilities. Some impact fees have been challenged on grounds that they are special taxes imposed without voter approval in violation of Article XIIIA, which was added by Proposition 13 in 1978. That objection is valid only if the fees exceed the cost of providing capital facilities needed to serve new development. If that were the case, then the fees would also run afoul of the U. S. Constitution and the Mitigation Fee Act. Articles XIIIC and XIIID, added by Proposition 218 in 1996, require voter approval for some "property-related fees," but exempt "the imposition of fees or charges as a condition of property development." The Mitigation Fee Act. California's impact fee statute originated in Assembly Bill 1600 during the 1987 session of the Legislature, and took effect in January, 1989. AB 1600 added several sections to the Government Code, beginning with Section 66000. Since that time the impact fee statute has been amended from time to time, and in 1997 was officially titled 3 ;Zt9 City of Rancho Cucamonga, California Park Impact Fee Study - January 16, 2006 the "Mitigation Fee Act." Unless otherwise noted, code sections referenced in this report are from the Government Code. The Act does not limit the types of capital improvements for which impact fees may be charged. It defInes public facilities very broadly to inelude "public improvements, public services and community amenities." Although the issue is not specifIcally addressed in the Mitigation Fee Act, other provisions of the Government Code (see Section 65913.8) prohibit the use of impact fees for maintenance or operating costs. Consequendy, the fees calculated in this report are based on capital costs only. The Mitigation Fee Act does not use the term "mitigation fee" except in its offIcial tide. Nor does it use the more common term "impact fee." The Act simply uses the word "fee," which is defined as "a monetary exaction, other than a tax or special assessment, ... that is charged by a local agency to the applicant in connection with approval of a development project for the purpose of defraying all or a portion of the cost of public facilities related to the development project...." To avoid confusion with other types of fees, this report uses the widely-accepted term "impact fee," which should be understood to mean "fee" as defined in the Mitigation Fee Act. The Mitigation Fee Act contains requirements for establishing, increasing and imposing impact fees. They are summarized below. It also contains provisions that govern the collection and expenditure of fees, and require annual reports and periodic re-evaluation of impact fee programs. Those administrative requirements are discussed in the Implementation Chapter of this report. Certain fees or charges related to development are exempted from the requirements of the Mitigation Fee Act. Among them are fees in lieu of park land dedication as authorized by the Quimby Act (Section 66477), fees collected pursuant to a reimbursement agreement or developer agreement, and fees for processing development applications. Required Findings. Section 66001 requires that an agency establishing, increasing or imposing impact fees, must make findings to: I. Identify the purpose of the fee; 2. Identify the use of the fee; and, 3. Determine that there is a reasonable relationship between: a. The use of the fee and the development type on which it is imposed; b. The need for the facility and the type of development on which the fee is imposed; and c. The amount of the fee and the facility cost attributable to the development project. (Applies only upon imposition of fees.) Each of those requirements is discussed in more detail below. Identifjdng the Purpose of the Fees. The broad purpose of impact fees is to protect the public health, safety and general welfare by providing for adequate public facilities. The specific purpose of the fees calculated in this study is to fund the construction of certain capital improvements identifIed in this report. Those improvements are needed to mitigate the impacts of additional development in the City, and thereby prevent deterioration in public services that would result from additional development if impact fee revenues were 4 ;Z7{) City of Rancho Cucamonga, California Park Impact Fee Study - January 16, 2006 not available to fund such improvements. Findings with respect to the purpose of a fee should state the purpose of the fees as financing development-related public facilities in a broad category, such as street improvements or water supply system improvements. Identifying the Use of the Fees. According to Section 66001, if a fee is used to finance public facilities, those facilities must be identified. A capital improvement plan may be used for that purpose, but is not mandatory if the facilities are identified in the General Plan, a Specific Plan, or in other public documents. Impact fees calculated in this study are based on specific capital facilities identified in this report. We recommend that this report be designated as the public document identifying the use of the fees. Reasonable Relationship Requirement. As discussed above, Section 66001 requires that, for fees subject to its provisions, a "reasonable relationship" must be demonstrated between: 1. the use of the fee and the type of development on which it is imposed; 2. the need for a public facility and the type of development on which a fee is imposed; and, 3. the amount of the fee and the facility cost attributable to the development on which the fee is imposed. These three reasonable relationship requirements as defined in the statute are closely related to "rational nexusH or "reasonable relationshipH requirements enunciated by a number of state courts. Although the term "dual rational nexus" is often used to characterize the standard by which courts evaluate the validity of development impact fees under the U. S. Constitution, we prefer a formulation that recognizes three elements: "impact or need" "benefit," and "proportionality." The dual rational nexus test explicitly addresses only the first two, although proportionality is reasonably implied, and was specifically mentioned by the U.S. Supreme Court in the Dolan case. The reasonable relationship language of the statute is considered less strict than the rational nexus standard used by many courts. Of course, the higher standard controls. We will use the nexus terminology in this report for two reasons: because it is more concise and descriptive, and also to signify that the methods used to calculate impact fees in this study are intended to satisfy the more demanding constitutional standard. Individual elements of the nexus standard are discussed further in the following paragraphs. Demonstrating an Imnact. All new development in a community creates additional demands on some, or all, public facilities provided by local government. If the supply of facilities is not increased to satisfy that additional demand, the quality or availability of public services for the entire community will deteriorate. Impact fees may be used to recover the cost of development-related facilities, but only to the extent that the need for facilities is a consequence of development that is subject to the fees. The No//an decision reinforced the principle that development exactions may be used only to mitigate conditions created by the developments upon which they are imposed. That principle clearly applies to impact fees. In this study, the impact of development on improvement needs is analyzed in terms of quantifiable relationships between various types of development and the demand for specific facilities, based on applicable level-of-service standards. This report contains all information needed to demonstrate this element of the nexus. Demonstrating a Benefit. A sufficient benefit relationship requires that impact fee revenues be segregated from other funds and expended only on the facilities for which the 5 :21/ City of Rancho Cucamonga, California Park Impact Fee Study - January 16, 2006 fees were charged. Fees must be expended in a timely manner and the facilities funded by the fees must serve the development paying the fees. Nothing in the U .S.Constitution or California law requires that facilities paid for with impact fee revenues be available exclusivelY to development paying the fees. Procedures for earmarking and expenditure of fee revenues are mandated by the Mitigation Fees Act, as are procedures to ensure that the fees are expended expeditiously or refunded. All of those requirements are intended to ensure that developments benefit from the impact fees they are required to pay. Thus, an adequate showing of benefit must address procedural as well as substantive issues. Demonstrating ProDortionality. The requirement that exactions be proportional to the impacts of development was clearly stated by the U.S. Supreme Court in the Do/an case (although the relevance of that decision to impact fees has been debated) and is logically necessary to establish a proper nexus. Proportionality is established through the procedures used to identify development-related facility costs, and in the methods used to calculate impact fees for various types of facilities and categories of development. In this study, the demand for facilities is measured in terms of relevant and measurable attributes of development. For example, the need for road improvements is measured by the number of vehicle trips generated by development. In calculating impact fees, costs for development-related facilities are allocated in proportion to the service needs created by different types and quantities of development. The following section describes methods used to allocate facility costs and calculate impact fees in ways that meet the proportionality standard. Impact Fees for Existing Facilities. It is important to note that impact fees calculated using the cost recovery method (described below) may be used to pay for existing facilities, provided that those facilities are needed to serve additional development and have the capacity to do so. In other words, such fees must satisfy the same nexus requirements as any other impact fee. IMPACT FEE CALCULATION METHODOLOGY Anyone of several legitimate methods may be used to calculate impact fees. The choice of a particular method depends primarily on the service characteristics and planning requirements for the facility type being addressed. Each method has advantages and disadvantages in a particular situation, and to some extent they are interchangeable, because they all allocate facility costs in proportion to the needs created by development. Reduced to its simplest terms, the process of calculating impact fees involves only two steps: determining the cost of development-related capital improvements, and allocating those costs equitably to various types of development. In practice, though, the calculation of impact fees can become quite complicated because of the many variables involved in defining the relationship between development and the need for facilities. The following paragraphs discuss three basic methods for calculating impact fees and how those methods can be applied. Plan-Based Impact Fee Calculation. The plan-based method allocates costs for a specified set of improvements to a specified amount of development. The improvements 6;212 City of Rancho Cucamonga, California Park Impact Fee Study - January 16, 2006 are identified by a facility plan and the development is identified by a land use plan. In this method, the total cost of relevant facilities is divided by total demand to calculate a cost per unit of demand. Then, the cost per unit of demand is multiplied by the amount of demand per unit of development (e.g. dwelling units or square feet of building area) in each category to arrive at a cost per unit of development. The plan-based method is often the most workable approach where actual service usage is difficult to measure (as is the case with administrative facilities), or does not direcdy drive the need for added facilities (as is the case with fire stations). It is also useful for facilities, such as streets, where capacity cannot always be matched closely to demand. This method is relatively inflexible in the sense that it is based on the relationship between a particular facility plan and a particular land use plan. If either plan changes significandy, the fees should be recalculated. Cost Recovery Impact Fee Calculation. The rationale for the cost recovery approach is that new development is paying for its share of the useful life and remaining capacity of facilities from which new growth will benefit. To calculate an impact fee using the cost recovery approach, facility cost is divided by ultimate number of demand units the facility will serve. Incremental Expansion Impact Fee Calculation. The incremental expansion method documents the current level-of-service (LOS) for each type of public facility in both quantitative and qualitative measures, based on an existing service standard such as square feet per capita or park acres per capita. The level-of-service standards arc determined in a manner similar to the current replacement cost approach used by property insurance companies. However, in contrast to insurance practices, Rancho Cucamonga will not use the funds for renewal and/or replacement of existing facilities. Rather, the City will use the impact fee revenue to expand or provide additional facilities, as needed, to accommodate new development. An incremental expansion cost method is best suited for public facilities that will be expanded in regular increments, with LOS standards based on current conditions in the community. In this study, the incremental expansion method is used for all components of the parks and recreation impact fee. All costs in the impact fee calculations are given in current dollars with no assumed inflation rate over time. Necessary cost adjustments can be made as part of the recommended annual evaluation and update of impact fees. One approach is to adjust for inflation in construction costs by means of an index like the one published by Engineering News Record (ENR). This index could be applied against the calculated impact fees. If cost estimates change significandy, the fees should be recalculated. 7}73 City of Rancho Cucamonga, California Park Impact Fee Study - January 16,2006 Parks This chapter presents the methodology used to update the 1991 City of Rancho Cucamonga Park Impact Fees. Based on discussions with City staff, major subdivisions of more than 50 parcels will be assessed a parkland in-lieu fee and minor subdivisions of 50 or less parcels will be assessed a park improvement impact fee. The parkland in-lieu fee is governed by the State's Quimby Act. When acquiring parkland as a condition of development approval, the Act allows the City to require either dedication of land or payment of in-lieu fees based on the value of the land. The Act applies to subdivisions of more than 50 parcels. Smaller projects (50 parcels or less) will be assessed the park improvement impact fee, which includes park amenities and recreational facilities. STUDY AREA The study area for this update is the City of Rancho Cucamonga. As the City's parks all have attributes that serve the City as a whole, impact fees are calculated on a citywide basis. The City's existing and planned parks are well distributed throughout the City and it is assumed that future parks will be sited so that all existing and new city residents will have reasonable access to City parks. DEMAND VARIABLE AND METHODOLOGY The demand for parks is considered a function of population. In 2003, the California Department of Finance Demographic Research Unit estimated population for the City of Rancho Cucamonga at 146,700, a 15% increase from the 2000 Census. In 2005, the State estimates a population of 161,830, an increase of 10% since 2003. As shown in Figures 1 and 2, all park capital costs are allocated to residential development only and standards are shown on a per capita basis. Figure 1: Parkland In-Lieu Fee Methodology Chart Residential Development I Persons Per Housing Unit I multiplied by Parkland Capital Cost Per Person 827,/ City of Rancho Cucatnonga. California Park Impact Fee Study- January 16,2006 Figure 2: Park Improvement Impact Fee Methodology Chart Residential Development Persons Per Housing Unit multiplied by Capital Cost Per Person Park Amenities - Cost Per Person Recreational Facilities - Cost Per Person The incremental expansion, or standards-based, methodology is used to calculate this fee. The incremental expansion method documents the current level-of-service (LOS) for the selected public facilities, based on current service standards such as park acres per capita or recreational facility square feet per capita. Persons per housing unit is used to differentiate the demand for parks by type of housing. Figure 3 illustrates persons per housing unit in Rancho Cucamonga by housing type as reported in the 2000 Census. For nursing/assisted living facilities, this figure is not available through the Census. When calculating the impact fees, TischlerBise conservatively estimates one person per nursing/ assisted living facility room or unit. .9 275 City of Rancho Cucamonga. California Park Impact Fee Study - January 16,2006 Figure 3: Persons Per Housing Unit in Rancho Cucamonga Combined Renter and Owner Total SF3 Sample Data SF110o-Percent Data Persons Vacant Total Persons Persons Households p" HsI"Units HsQ"Units p" Household Housinl! Unit 96,263 28,662 3.36 62 29,28 3.29 6,037 2,444 2.47 . 2.531 2.38 649 229 2.83 23 2.74 4,252 1,532 2.78 , 1,561 2.72 4,711 2.321 2.03 161 2,48; 1.90 2,921 1,334 2.19 11 lA4 2.02 722 297 2.43 3 33< 2.15 6,210 2,820 2.20 '" 2,961: 2.09 2,705 1,317 2.05 .. 1.35 2.00 39 20 1.95 2 1.95 124,509 40,976 3.04 1,253 .42.22' 2.95 124,117 40.863 42.134 Units in Structure 1 detached (SFD) 1 attached (SF A) 2 3-4 "-9 10-19 20-49 50+ Mobile Home (MH) Qth" 2.97% Vacancy Rate 2000 Persong Per Hougjng Unit by HOU9ing Type Persons Households PPH Vacant Total PPHU Hsp" Unit Mix HsQ"Units HSI!Units Single Family Detached 96,263 28.662 3.36 624 29.286 3.29 69% Single Family Attached 6,037 2,444 2.47 94 2.538 2.38 6% Duplex 649 229 2.83 8 237 2.74 1% Multiple 3-4 4,252 1,532 2.78 29 1,561 2.72 4% Multiple 5-9 4,711 2,321 2.03 161 2.482 1.90 6% Multiple 10+ 9,853 4,451 2.21 299 4,750 2.07 11% Mobile Home 2,705 1,317 2.05 38 1,355 2.00 3% Other 39 20 1.95 0 20 1.95 0% TOTAL Less Group Quarters 124,509 42.209 2.95 100% Group Quarters 3,626 Sample Difference (392) (113) (95) TOTAL 128,135 Sou."",2000U.S.Censu.o PARKLAND - MAJOR SUBDIVISIONS (MORE THAN 50 PARCELS) The Quimby Act provides that a City may require residential subdividers to dedicate land for future parks or to pay fees in lieu of dedication. The Acts states that requirements for land dedication or in-lieu fees are to be based on a population ratio of 3.0 to 5.0 acres per thousand added residents, depending on the existing ratio. The incremental expansion methodology is used to calculate this in-lieu fee. The first step of calculating the incremental expansion methodology measures the current level-of-service (LOS) being provided to existing development. The second step involves determining the cost per person to provide this LOS. Park/and (Major Subdivisions) - LOS Analysis Figure 4 lists the City of Rancho Cucamonga's community, neighborhood and undeveloped parkland, totaling 405 acres. The Quimby Act requires that the level-of-service calculation be based on the City's population from the most recent Census. Therefore the 2000 Census population of 127,743 is used. Since residential development creates 100% of the demand for parkland, the residential proportionate share factor is 100%. To calculate the current parkland LOS, the total park acreage of 405 acres is multiplied by a residential demand of 10 ;2 710 City of Rancho Cucamonga, California Park Impact Fee Study - January 16, 2006 100%. That number, 405, is divided by the 2000 Census population of 127,743. This results in 3.17 acres parkland per 1,000 persons or .00317 acre per person. According to the Quimby Act, the City is authorized to base its dedication/in-lieu fee requirement on this ratio, as it does not exceed five acres per thousand residents. 11 211 City of Rancho Cucamonga, California Park Impact Fee Study- January 16, 2006 Figure 4: Parkland LOS Standards # of Acquisition Acquisition Park acres Cost! Acre'" Cost Community Parks Eliwanda Creek Park 12 $425,000 $5,100,000 Heritage Community Park 40 $425,000 $17,000,000 Red Hill Community Park 44 $425,000 $18,700,000 Sports Complex 42 $425,000 $17,850,000 Central Park 20 $425,000 $8,500,000 Neighborhood Parks Bear Gulch Park 5 $425,000 $2,125,000 Beryl Park East 10 $425,000 $4,250,000 Beryl Park West 10 $425,000 $4,250,000 Church Street Park 6.5 $425,000 $2,762,500 Coyote Canyon Park 5 $425,000 $2,125,000 Day Creek Park 11 $425,000 $4,675,000 Ellena Park 5 $425,000 $2,125,000 Colden Oak Park 5 $425,000 $2,125,000 Hermosa Park 10 $425,000 $4,250,000 Kenyon Park 6.5 $425,000 $2,762,500 La Mission Park - Ralph M. Lewis 8 $425,000 $3,400,000 Lions Park 1.5 $425,000 $637,500 Milliken Park 10 $425,000 $4,250,000 Old Town Park 5 $425,000 $2,125,000 Spruce Ave. Park 5 $425,000 $2,125,000 Victoria Grove Park 6.5 $425,000 $2,762,500 Vintage Park 6.5 $425,000 $2,762,500 West Greenway Park 5 $425,000 $2,125,000 Windrows Park 8 $425,000 $3,400,000 Mountain View Park 5 $425,000 $2,125,000 Victoria Arbors Park 8 $425,000 $3,400,000 Undeveloped Parkland Central Park 83 $425,000 $35,275,000 Etiwanda Creek Park 16 $425.000 $6,800,000 South Etiwanda 5.5 $425,000 $2,337,500 TOTAL 405 $]72,]25,000 12 ;2 7 g City of Rancho Cucamonga, California Park Impact Fee Study - January 16, 2006 Proportionate Share Residential 100% Demand Units Population (2000) 127,743 LOS Acres per person Acres per 1,000 persons .00317 3.17 *s ouree: Ci!] fjRancho Cucamonga, based on stuqy conducted by]. William Murpf?y and Associates Parkland (Ma;or Subdivisions) - Cost AnalYsis The City estimates it costs $425,000 to acquire an acre of residential land for parkland. This estimate is based on an August 1, 2005 appraisal study conducted by J. William Murphy and Associates expressly for this purpose. The study presents an estimated value per acre for undeveloped land in each of the City's residential land use zones. The City anticipates that in the future it will acquire land in the areas zoned "very low" and "low" density. Therefore, the midpoint of these two appraisal values is used - $425,000 ("very low" density had an estimated value of $400,000 and "low" density a value of $450,000). Using this figure, the total acquisition cost is $172,125,000 for 405 acres (405 acres x $425,000 = $172,125,000). As shown in Figure 5, the total cost per person to provide additional parkland for new residential development is $1,347.43. This is calculated by multiplying the current LOS of .00317 acre per person by $425,000 per acre (.00317 x $425,000 = $1,347.43). 13 :219 City of Rancho Cucamonga, California Park Impacr Fee Study - January 16, 2006 Figure 5: Parkland Cost Standards (Subdivisions) Level of Service Acres per person Acres per 1,000 persons .00317 3.17 Cost Factor Cost per acre $425,000 Cost Per Person $1,347.43 PARK AMENITIES (MINOR SUBDIVISIONS OF 50 OR LESS PARCELS. AND NON-SUBDIVSION PROJECTS) The incremental expansion methodology is used to calculate the park amenities component of the Parks Improvement Impact Fee. The first step of calculating the incremental expansion methodology measures the current level-of-service (LOS) being provided to existing development. The second step involves determining the cost per person to provide this LOS. Park Amenities (Minor Subdivisions and Non-Subdivision Projects) - LOS Analysis Figure 6 summarizes the acreage for the City's two developed park categories - community and neighborhood - and provides the City's estimated cost per acre for park amenities. Undeveloped park land is not included in this section as no amenities are provided on these sites. The City estimates a cost of $400,000/acre for its prototype community park, which typically include restroom facilities, play areal tot lot, exercise/jogging course, group picnic shelter, 2 full basketball courts, 3 lighted ballfields and on-site parking. The City estimates a cost of $300,000 an acre for neighborhood parks that typically include restrooms, 160' unlighted ballfield, play areal tot lot, exercise/jogging course, 1 full basketball court, picnic shelter with tables and barbeque grills and on-site parking. As neighborhood parks offer amenities that are accessed by residents throughout the City, particularly for ballfields, these parks are considered as serving the entire City. Of the City's developed park acreage, community and neighborhood parks represent 158 and 142.50 acres, respectively. Since residential development creates 100% of the demand for park amenities, a residential proportionate share factor of 100% is used. To calculate the current park amenities LOS, 300.50 developed acres is multiplied by 100% residential demand. That number, 300.50, is divided by 161,830 persons. This results in .00186 developed acres per person. 14 2~ {j City of Rancho Cucamonga, California Park Impact Fee Study - January 16, 2006 Figure 6: Park Amenities LOS Standards Acres Park Type Community Park Neighborhood Park TOTAL Unit replacement cost" $400,000 $300,000 Total replacement cost $63,200,000 $42,750,000 $105,950,000 158.00 142.50 300.50 Proportionate Share Residential 100% Demand Units 2005 Population 161,830 LOS Developed acres per person *Source: City if Rancho Cucamonga .00186 Park Amenities (Minor Subdivisions and Non-Subdivision Projects) - Cost Analysis As shown in Figure 6, the City estimates the current inventory of park amenities to have a total replacement value of $105,950,000. As shown in Figure 7, this results in an average amenity cost of $352,579 per acre ($105,950,000 / 300.5 acres = $352,579 per acre). The cost per person is calculated by multiplying the current LOS of .00186 developed acres per person by the amenity cost of $352,579 per acre which results in a cost factor of $654.70 per person. Figure 7: Park Amenities Cost Standards Level of Service Developed acres per person .00186 Cost Factor Cost of amenitiesl acre $352,579 Cost Per Person $654.70 15 2? / City of Rancho Cucamonga, California Park Impact Fee Study - January 16, 2006 RECREATIONAL FACILITIES (MINOR SUBDIVISIONS OF 50 OR LESS PARCELS. AND NON-SUBDIVSION PROJECTS) The incremental expansion methodology is used to calculate the recreational facilities component of the Park Improvement Impact Fee. The City will use the impact fees to provide new/expanded facilities of a similar type. The first step of calculating the incremental expansion methodology measures the current level-of-service (LOS) being provided to existing development. The second step involves determining the cost per person to provide this LOS. Recreational Facilities (Minor Subdivisions and Non-subdivision projects) - LOS Analysis Figure 8 lists the City's recreational facilities. As residential development creates 100% of the demand for recreational facilities, a residential proportionate share factor of 100% is used. To calculate the current recreational facilities LOS, 167,895 square feet of recreational facility space is multiplied by 100% residential demand. That number, 167,895, is divided by 161,830 persons. This results in 1.037 square feet per person. Figure 8: Recreational Facilities LOS Standards Square Replacement Cost Feet Per Sq. Ft.' 10,228 $439 12,000 $439 34,000 $439 57,000 $371 3,045 $439 73,850 $506 167,895 Facility"'''' Lions West Community Center Lions East Community Center RC Family Sports Center Central Park Community Center Heritage Park Equestrian Center Victoria Gardens Cultural Center TOTAL Replacement Cost'" $4,487,223 $5,264,634 $14,916,464 $21,172,650 $1,335,901 $37,368,100 $74,793,132 Proportionate Share Residential 100% Demand Units Population 161,830 LOS square feet per person 1.037 *Source: Ciry o/&mcho Cucamonga **Neighborhood Center located at 9791 Arrow Highwrry (Former Senior Center) has not been included in the list of recreational facilities pending/urther poliry decisions on use and final disposition rif this facility to be determined ry the City CounciL 16 2~2 City of Rancho Cucamonga, California Park Impact Fee Study - January 16, 2006 Recreational Facilities (Minor Subdivisions and Non-subdivision projects) - Cost Analysis As shown in Figure 8, the City estimates its recreational facilities have a total replacement value of $74,793,132 or an average replacement cost of $445.48/square foot.' The cost per person is shown in Figure 9 and is calculated by multiplying the current LOS of 1.037 square feet per person by the average cost per square foot of $445.48 which results in a cost factor of $462.1 7 per person. Figure 9: Recreational Facilities Cost Standards Level of Seroice Square feet per person 1.037 Cost Factor Cost Per Square Foot $445.48 Cost Per Person $462.17 PARKLAND IN-LIEU FEES (FOR MAJQR SUBDIVISIONS) Figure 10 provides a summary of the level of service and cost factors used to calculate the Parkland In-lieu Fee for subdivisions of more than 50 parcels. This component of the fee is assessed on new development when the City opts to require payment in-lieu of land dedication. Per Quimby Act requirements, the level of service standard is based on the ratio of current parkland acreage to the 2000 Census population for the City. This results in 3.17 acres of parkland per 1,000 persons. Figure 10 shows the capital cost for parkland for subdivisions is $1,347 per person. Persons per housing unit (or per room for nursing/assisted living facilities) are multiplied by the capital cost. Using single family housing units as an example, 3.29 persons per housing unit is multiplied by the cost per person. This results in a parkland in-lieu fee of $4,429 for a single family detached housing unit (3.29 persons per housing unit x $1,347 capital cost per person = $4,429). This calculation is repeated for the remaining housing categories. I Replacement cost per square foot for the recently-constructed Central Park Community Center (i\hy 2005) and the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center (currently nnder construction) are current construction costs plus 15% for design and construction management. Replacement costs for the other facilities are an estimate based on the average construction cost per square foot for the new Central Park and Victoria Gardens facilities, or $381.50 (($323 + $440)/2=$381.50). Fiftcen percent is added to this figure to account for design and construction management, resulting in an estimated replacement cost of $438.72 for the Lions West and Lions East Community Centers, the RC Family Sports Center and the Heritage Park Equestrian Center. 17 2'33 City of Rancho Cucamonga, California Park Impact Fee Study - January 16,2006 Figure 10: Parkland In-Lieu Level of Service and Cost Summary (Major Subdivisions) Standards; Persons Per Housing Unit Single Family Detached Single Family Attached Duplex Multiple 3-4 Multiple 5-9 Multiple 10+ Mobile Home Persons Per Room Nursingl Assisted Living Facility Level Of Service Park Acreage per 1,000 People Park Land Cost per Acre Park Land Cost per Person Capital Cost Per Person Maximum Supportable Impact Fee per Housing Unit Single Family Detached Single Family Attached Duplex Multiple 3-4 Multiple 5-9 Multiple 10+ Mobile Home Nursingl Assisted Living Facility (per room) 3.29 2.38 2.74 2.72 1.90 2.07 2.00 1.00 3.17 $425,000 $1,347 $1,347 $4,429 $3,205 $3,690 $3,670 $2,558 $2,795 $2,690 $1,347 18 2~1' City of Rancho Cucamonga, California Park Impact Fee Study - January 16, 2006 PARK IMPROVEMENT IMPACT EEE (MINOR SUBDIVISIONS i\ND NON-SUBDJVlSION PROJECTS) Figure 11 provide a summary of the level-of-service and cost factors used to calculate the Park Improvement Impact Fee for minor subdivisions and non-subdivision projects. This fee includes capital costs for recreational facilities and park amenities. As the Quimby Act does not apply to minor subdivisions of 50 parcels or less, the level of service standard is developed using the 2005 estimated population for the City. Figure 10 shows the capital cost for park improvements of $1,117 per person. Of this, $462 is for recreational facilities and $655 for park amenities. Persons per housing unit (or per room or unit for nursing/assisted living facilities) are multiplied by the capital cost. Using single family housing units as an example, 3.29 persons per housing unit is multiplied by the cost per person. This results in a park improvement impact fee of $3,671 for a single family detached housing unit (3.29 persons per housing unit x $1,117 capital cost per person = $3,671). This calculation is repeated for the remaining housing categories. 19 ;2g 5 City of Rancho Cucamonga, California Park Impact Fee Study- January 16, 2006 Figure 11: Parkland Improvement Impact Fee Level of Service and Cost Summary (Minor Subdivisions and Non-subdivision projects) Standards: Persons Per Housing Unit Single Family Detached Single Family Attached Duplex Multiple 3-4 Multiple 5-9 Multiple 10+ Mobile Home Persons Per Room Nursing! Assisted Living Facility Level Of Service Recreational Facilities Cost per Person Park Amenities Cost per Person Capital Cost Per Person Maximum Supportable Impact Fee per Housing Unit Single Family Detached Single Family Attached Duplex Multiple 3-4 Multiple 5-9 Multiple 10+ Mobile Home Nursingl Assisted Living Facility (per room) 3.29 2.38 2.74 2.72 1.90 2.07 2.00 1.00 $462 $655 $1,117 $3,671 $2,657 $3,058 $3,042 $2,120 $2,317 $2,230 $1,117 Developers may be eligible for site-specific credits or reimbursements only if they provide system improvements that have been included in the fee calculation schedule. Project improvements normally required as part of the development approval process are not eligible for credits against impact fees. 20 ;2~fo City of Rancho Cucamonga, California Park Impact Fee Study - January 16, 2006 Appendix 1: Implementation and Administration This section of the report contains recommendations for adoption and administration of a impact fee program based on this study, and for the interpretation and application of impact fees recommended herein. Statutory requirements for the adoption and administration of fees imposed as a condition of development approval are found in the Mitigation Fee Act (Government Code Sections 66000 et seq.). ADOPTION The form in which development impact fees are adopted, whether by ordinance or resolution, should be determined by the City Attorney. Typically, it is desirable that specific fee schedules be set by resolution to facilitate periodic adjustments. Procedures for adoption of fees subject to the Mitigation Fee Act, including notice and public hearing requirements, are specified in Government Code Section 66016. Such fees do not become effective until 60 days after final action by the Governing body. Actions establishing or increasing fees subject to the Mitigation Fee Act require certain findings, as set forth in Government Code Section 66001 and discussed in Section 1 of this report summarized below. ADMINISTRATION Several requirements of the California Mitigation Fee Act (Government Code Sections 66000 et seq.) address the administration of impact fee programs, including collection and accounting procedures, refunds, updates and reporting. References to code sections in the following paragraphs pertain to the California Govemment Code. Imposition of Fees. Pursuant to the Mitigation Fee Act, when the City imposes an impact fee upon a specific development project, it must make findings to : 1. Identify the purpose of the fee; 2. Identify the use of the fee; and 3. Determine that there is a reasonable relationship between: a. The use of the fee and the development type on which it is imposed; b. The need for the facility and the type of development on which the fee is imposed; and c. The amount of the fee and the facility cost attributable to the development project. Most of those findings would normally be based on an impact fee study, and this study is intended to provide a basis for all of the required findings. According to the statute, the use of the fee (2., above) may be specified in a capital improvement plan, the General Plan, or other public document. This study is intended to serve as a public document identifying the use of the fees. 21 ;Zg7 City of Rancho Cucamonga, California Park Impact Fee Study - January 16, 2006 In addition, Section 66006, as amended by SB 1693, provides that a local agency, at the time it imposes a fee for public improvements on a specific development project, "... shall identify the public improvement that the fee will be used to finance." For each type of fee calculated io this report, the improvements to be funded by the impact fees are identified. Consequently, this report provides a basis for the notification required by the statute. The City Attorney should be consulted as to the specific method of notification to be provided. Collection of Fees. Section 66007, provides that a local agency shall not require payment of fees by developers of residential projects prior to the date of final inspection, or issuance of a certificate of occupancy, whichever occurs first. However, "utility service fees" (not defined) may be collected upon application for utility service. In a residential development project of more than one dwelling unit, the agency may choose to collect fees either for iodividual units or for phases upon final inspection, or for the entire project upon final inspection of the first dwelling unit completed. An important exception allows fees to be collected at an earlier time if they will be used to reimburse the agency for expenditures previously made, or for improvements or facilities for which money has been appropriated. The agency must also have adopted a construction schedule or plan for the improvement. These restrictions on the time of collection do not apply to non-residential development. Notwithstanding the foregoing restrictions, many cities routinely collect impact fees for all facilities at the time building permits are issued, and builders often find it convenient to pay the fees at that time. In cases where the fees are not collected upon issuance of building permits, Section 66007 provides that the city may require the property owner to execute a contract to pay the fee, and to record that contracr as a lien against the property until the fees are paid. Credit for Improvements provided by Developers. If the City requires a developer, as a condition of project approval, to construct facilities or improvements for which impact fees have been, or will be, charged, the impact fee imposed on that development project, for that type of facility, should be adjusted to reflect a credit for the cost of t1lOse facilities or improvements. If the reimbursement would exceed the amount of the fee to be paid by the development for that type of facility, the City may wish to negotiate a reimbursement agreement with the developer. Credit for Existing Development. If a project involves replacement, redevelopment or intensification of previously existing development, impact fees should be applied only to the portion of the project which represents an increase in demand for City facilities, as measured by the demand variables used in this study. Since residential service demand is normally estimated on the basis of demand per dwelling unit, an addition to a single family dwelling unit typically would not be subject to an impact fee if it does not increase the number of dwelling units in the structure. If a dwelling unit is added to an existing structure, no impact fee would be charged for the previously existing units. A similar approach can be used for other types of development. Earmarking of Fee Revenue. Section 66006 specifies that fees shall be deposited with other fees for the improvement in a separate capital facilities account or fund in a manner to 22 2~S City of Rancho Cucamonga, California Park Impact Fee Study - January 16, 2006 avoid any commingling of the fees with other revenues and funds of the local agency, except for temporary investments. Fees must be expended solely for the purpose for which the fee was collected. Interest earned on the fee revenues must also be placed in the capital account and used for the same purpose. The language of the law is not clear as to whether depositing fees "with other fees for the improvement" refers to a specific capital improvement or a class of improvemcnts (e.g., street improvements). We are not aware of any city that has interpreted that language to mean that funds must be segregated by individual projects. As a practical matter, that would make it exceedingly difficult to accumulate enough funds to construct any improvements funded by impact fees. Common practice is to maintain separate funds or accounts for impact fee revenues by facility category (i.e., streets, traffic signals, or park improvements), but not for individual projects. We recommend that approach. Reporting. As amended by SB 1693 in 1996, Section 66006 requires that once each year, within 180 days of the close of the fiscal year, the local agency must make available to the public the following information for each separate account established to receive impact fee revenues: 1. The amount of the fee; 2. The beginning and ending balance of the account or fund; 3. The amount of the fees collected and interest earned; 4. Identification of each public improvement on which fees were expended and the amount of the expenditures on each improvement, including the percentage of the cost of the public improvement that was funded with fees; 5. Identification of the approximate date by which the construction of a public improvement will commence, if the City determines sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing of an incomplete public improvement; 6. A description of each inter-fund transfer or loan made from the account or fund, including interest rates, repayment dates, and a description of the improvement on which the transfer or loan will be expended; 7. The amount of any refunds or allocations made pursuant to Section 66001, paragraphs (e) and (f). That information must be reviewed by the City Council at its next regularly scheduled public meeting, but not less than 15 days after the statements are made public. Findings and Refunds. Prior to the adoption of Government Code amendments contained in SB 1693, a local agency collecting impact fees was required to expend or commit the fee revenue within five years or make fllldings to justify a continued need for the money. Otherwise, those funds had to be refunded. SB 1693 changed that requirement in material ways. Now, Section 66001 requires that, for the fifth fiscal year following the first deposit of any impact fee revenue into an account or fund as required by Section 66006, and every five 23 ';259 City of Rancho Cucamonga, California Park Impact Fee Study - January 16, 2006 years thereafter, the local agency shall make all of the following fIndings for any fee revenue that remains unexpended, whether committed or uncommitted: 1. Identify the purpose to which the fee will be put; 2. Demonstrate the reasonable relationship between the fee and the purpose for which it is charged; 3. Identify all sources and amounts of funding anticipated to complete financing of incomplete improvements for which impact fees are to be used; 4. Designate the approximate dates on which the funding necessary to complete financing of those improvements will be deposited into the appropriate account or fund. Those findings are to be made in conjunction with the annual reports discussed above. If such findings are not made as required by Section 66001, the local agency must refund the moneys in the account or fund. Once the agency determines that sufficient funds have been collected to complete an incomplete improvement for which impact fee revenue is to be used, it must, within 180 days of that determination, identify an approximate date by which construction of the public improvement will be commenced. If the agency fails to comply with that requirement, it must refund impact fee revenue in the account according to procedures specified in the statute. Costs of Implementation, The ongoing cost of implementing the impact fee program is not included in the fees themselves. Implementation costs would include the staff time involved in applying the fees to specifIc projects, accounting for fee revenues and expenditures, preparing required annual reports, updating the fees, and preparing forms and public information handouts. We recommend that those costs be included in user fees charged to applicants for processing development applications. Annual Update of the Capital Improvement Plan. Section 66002 provides that if a local agency adopts a capital improvement plan to identify the use of impact fees, that plan must be adopted and annually updated by a resolution of the governing body at a noticed public hearing. The alternative is to identify improvements in other public documents. Since impact fee calculations in this study include costs for future facilities to be funded by impact fees, we believe it is to the City's advantage to use this report as the public document in which the use of impact fees is identifIed. In that event, we believe the City would not be required to update its CIP annually to satisfy Section 66002. Indexing of Impact Fee Rates. The fees recommended in this report are stated in current dollars. Fees should be adjusted annually to account for construction cost escalation. The Engineering News Record Building Cost Index is recommended as the basis for indexing the cost of yet to be constructed projects. It is desirable that the ordinance or resolution establishing the fees include provisions for annual escalation. Updates of This Study. Generally, impact fees should be reviewed and updated about every fIve years, unless significant changes in land use or facility plans make it necessary to update the fees more often. 24 21{) THE C I T Y o F I RANCUO CUCAMONCA Staff Report DATE: April 19, 2006 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, and City Manager FROM: Pamela S. Easter, Deputy City Manager I Acting Animal Care & Services Director Kimberly S. Thomas, Management Analyst III, City Manager's Office SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CLARIFYING REFERENCES IN PROVISIONS OF THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CODE PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED BY REFERENCE, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CHAPTERS 3 AND 12 OF DIVISION 2 OF TITLE 3 OF THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CODE, ALL PERTAINING TO THE REGULATION OF ANIMALS, AMENDING TITLE 6 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE, AND DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council hold a Public Hearing to consider adoption of the attached urgency Ordinance clarifying references in provisions of the San Bernardino County Code, previously adopted by reference, and the adoption by Reference of Chapters 3 and 12 of Division 2 of Title 3 of the San Bernardino County Code related to animals. Approval of this Ordinance and the finding of urgency requires a minimum four-fifths vote, and is recommended in order to fully protect the public health, safety and welfare. The provisions will be in effect to help provide a smooth transition from a County to City operation, given the need for the completion of the Rancho Cucamonga Animal Care and Adoption Center (Shelter) to be operated by the City on May 2, 2006, and Field Services on July 1, 2006. On the advice of the City Attorney's Office, our Transition Consultant Mr. Winograd, and in consultation with our developing Animal Care and Services City Staff, it has been determined that this is the best course of stable action until after the new Department is up and running, and there has been sufficient time to determine any needed adjustments for the new City operation. As this is in the interest of the public health and safety, it is recommended that the Ordinance be adopted as an urgency measure, as permitted by law, in order for it to take effect immediately. This Urgency Ordinance has been reviewed by the City Attorney's Office. BACKGROUND I ANALYSIS The proposed ordinance clarifies references related to terms and definitions specific to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Animal Care and Services Department Staff and Program. The ordinance provides that specific references to the County Code in Chapters 1, 2, 3, 12 and 14 of Division 2 of Title 3 of the San Bernardino County Code will, to the greatest extent the context ;2.Q/ PAGE 2 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CLARIFYING REFERENCES IN PROVISIONS OF THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CODE PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED BY REFERENCE, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CHAPTERS 3 AND 12 OF DIVISION 2 OF TITLE 3 OF THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CODE, ALL PERTAINING TO THE REGULATION OF ANIMALS, AMENDING TITLE 6 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE (URGENCY ORDINANCE) permits, be construed as referring to corresponding and/or analogous provisions in the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. References in any of the foregoing Chapters to specific sections of the County Zoning Code shall be disregarded. The Ordinance also provides that the City Manager is authorized to render a final determination in the event of any apparent conflict between the County Code provisions adopted by reference and the City Code provisions, relating to animals. Chapters 1, 2 and 14 of Division 2 of Title 3 of the San Bernardino County Code, previously adopted by the City by reference, provide the following: Chapter 1: Addresses the impoundment of animals, disposal of dead animals, and the prevention of animals running at large. It also regulates the possession of wild, exotic and non-domestic animals in captivity. It further regulates the licensing of pet shops, bird farms and similar premises, and establishes procedures for dealing with noisy animals. Chapter 2: Provides procedures for handling animals that bite, rabies vaccinations, and the licensing of dogs. Chapter 14: Details procedures for handling potentially dangerous and vicious animals with County procedures, including procedures for providing notice and a hearing in connection with a determination that an animal is potentially dangerous or vicious. Chapters 3 and 12 of Division 2 of Title 3 of the San Bernardino County Code, to be adopted by the City by reference, provide the following: Chapter 3: Provides requirements and regulations for construction and operations, and required vaccinations for dog kennels, as well as permitting requirements. Chapter 12: Details requirements and regulations for construction and operations, and required vaccinations for catteries, as well as permitting requirements. A Resolution establishing City fees for animal related services will be forthcoming at the May 3, 2006, Council meeting. CONCLUSION It is recommended that the Council hold a Public Hearing to consider adoption of the attached urgency Ordinance clarifying references in provisions of the San Bernardino County Code, previously adopted by reference, and adoption by Reference of Chapters 3 and 12 of Division 2 of Title 3 of the San Bernardino County Code related to animals. Respectfully submitted, BvrruJo S E~ Pamela S. Easter Deputy City Manager ~ // elf' -jp;.i;; ".;) Jc !J.i;r;.1t/y--' Kimb~ Thomas Management Analyst III :Jq/-/ PAGE 3 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CLARIFYING REFERENCES IN PROVISIONS OF THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CODE PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED BY REFERENCE, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CHAPTERS 3 AND 12 OF DIVISION 2 OF TITLE 3 OF THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CODE, ALL PERTAINING TO THE REGULATION OF ANIMALS, AMENDING TITLE 6 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE (URGENCY ORDINANCE) Attachment - Proposed City Ordinance clarifying references in provisions of the San Bernardino County Code, previously adopted by reference, and the adoption by reference of Chapters 3 and 12 of Division 2 of Title 3 of the San Bernardino County Code related to animals. (Urgency Ordinance) JQ/-c1 ORDINANCE NO. 1foD AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CLARIFYING REFERENCES IN PROVISIONS OF THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CODE PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED BY REFERENCE, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CHAPTERS 3 AND 12 OF DIVISION 2 OF TITLE 3 OF THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CODE, ALL PERTAINING TO THE REGULATION OF ANIMALS, AMENDING TITLE 6 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE, AND DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby ordains as follows: Section 1. In order to clarify references in Chapters 1, 2, and 14 of Division 2 of Title 3 of the San Bernardino County Code (heretofore adopted by reference), to County officers and officials, the County itself and any other matters having reference to the County, such references shall, to the greatest extent possible given the context, be construed and interpreted to refer to and mean City officers and officials, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Specific references to the County Code in Chapters 1,2,3,12 and 14 of Division 2 of Title 3 of the San Bernardino County Code shall, to the greatest extent the context permits, be construed as referring to corresponding and/or analogous provisions in the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. References in any of the foregoing Chapters to specific sections of the County Zoning Code shall be disregarded. The City Manager is hereby authorized to render a final determination in the event of any apparent conflict between references in Chapters 1,2,3,12 and/or 14 of Division 2 of Title 3 of the San Bernardino County Code, and the provisions of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. Section 2. As those terms set forth below are used in Chapters 1,2,3, 12 and 14 of Division 2 of Title 3 of the San Bernardino County Code pertaining to the regulation of animals, and adopted in Chapter 6.02 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, the following definitions shall apply: A. "County", "County of San Bernardino", or "Unincorporated Areas" shall mean and refer to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, unless the context makes clear that the reference is intended to mean the County of San Bernardino without reference to the City. 11231-0001\883435vl.doc ;zqj- 3 B. "Chief Officer", "Health Officer", "County Health Officer", "Shelter Keeper", "Public Health Animal Shelter Supervisor", or any similar term shall mean and refer to the City Animal Care and Services Director, or designee thereof, as to matters, services and/or duties falling within the jurisdiction of the City pursuant to Chapter 6.02 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, excepting only as to those matters, services and/or duties for which the City elects by agreement to be handled or performed by the County or other entity. C. "Animal Shelter", "Animal Control", "Animal Care and Control Program", or "Department of Public Health" shall mean and include the City of Rancho Cucamonga Animal Care and Adoption Center and related animal care program, or other entity designated by the City Council for purposes of animal licensing, care, control and regulation, including any public or private agency providing animal care and field services pursuant to contract or statute. D. "Animal Control Officer" or "Animal Care and Adoption Center Personnel" shall mean and include the City's Lead Field Services Humane Officer, Field Services Humane Officer, and/or other persons duly appointed to enforce the provisions of Chapter 6.02 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. E. "Fees", "County Fee Schedule", or "Schedule of Fees" shall mean and refer to fees specified in Chapter 6.02 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code unless the fee clearly relates to services performed by the County or other entity designated by the City for which the County or other entity is to be paid in whole or in part by such fees pursuant to an agreement with the City. F. "Office of Planning" and/or "Environmental Health Services" shall mean and include the City Planning Department, other department of the City, or any public or private agency under contract with the City, providing the most comparable services. G. "Board of Supervisors" shall mean and include the City Council of the City. 2 d- qlej 11231-0001\883435vl.doc H. "County Code" shall mean and include the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code unless such code reference is clearly intended to refer to services performed in accordance with the San Bernardino County Code. Section 3. Section 6.02.010 of Chapter 6.02 of Title 6 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "6.02.010 County regulations adopted. A. The following chapters of the San Bernardino County Code are hereby adopted by reference in the same manner as if fully set forth herein: 1. Chapter 1 of Division 2 of Title 3 (Health and Sanitation and Animal Regulations), as the same exists on April I, 2006, but excluding Section 32.0120 (Penalties). 2. Regulations), (Penalties). 3. Chapter 3 of Division 2 of Title 3 (Health and Sanitation and Animal Regulations), as the same exists on April I, 2006, but excluding Section 32.037 (Penalties). 4. Chapter 2 of Division 2 of Title 3 (Health and Sanitation and Animal as the same exists on April 1, 2006, but excluding Section 32.0224 Regulations), (Penalties). 5. Chapter 14 of Division 2 of Title 3 (Health and Sanitation and Animal Regulations), as the same exists on April I, 2006, but excluding Section 32.1409 (Criminal Penalties/Injunction). Chapter 12 of Division 2 of Title 3 (Health and Sanitation and Animal as the same exists on April 1, 2006, but excluding Section 32.127 It is the intent of the City Council in adopting the foregoing County Code provisions that the same shall be enforced within the corporate limits of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the same extent and with the same authority as would otherwise be applicable to the unincorporated areas of the County of San Bernardino. 3 c2Qj-5 11231-000 I \883435v I.doc A certified copy of each of the foregoing provIsIOns of the San Bernardino County Code is on file in the office ofthe City Clerk. B. Penalties. 1. Any person, firm, partnership, corporation or other entity violating any provision of Chapter 1 or 14 of Division 2 of Title 3 of the San Bernardino County Code shall be guilty of an infraction or misdemeanor as hereinafter specified. Each day or portion thereof such violation is in existence shall be a new and separate offense. Any violator so convicted shall be: (a) Guilty of an infraction and punished by a fine not exceeding one hundred dollars ($100.00) and not less than fifty dollars ($50.00) for a first offense. (b) Guilty of an infraction and punished by a fine not exceeding two hundred dollars ($200.00) and not less than one hundred dollars ($100.00) for a second offense. (c) Guilty of a misdemeanor for the third and any additional offense, and shall be punishable by fines not exceeding one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) or six (6) months in jail, or both. (d) Notwithstanding the above, a first or second offense may be charged and prosecuted as a misdemeanor. Payment of any fine or service of a jail sentence shall not relieve any violator from the responsibility of correcting the condition resulting from the violation. In addition to the foregoing penalties, the court may order that the guilty party reimburse the City and/or County for all of its costs of investigating, analyzing, inspecting, abating and prosecuting the enforcement action against the guilty party. The court shall fix the amount of any such reimbursement upon submission of proof of such costs by the City and/or County. The owner, manager, and operator of every activity or facility subject to this chapter shall be responsible for any violation of this chapter by an employee thereof. 2. Any person, firm, partnership or corporation or other entity violating any of the provisions of Chapter 2 of Division 2 of Title 3 of the San Bernardino County Code shall be guilty of an infraction and upon being found guilty thereof shall be 4 Jq/-b 11231-0001\883435vl.doc punished as set forth in Section 1.12.030 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, pertaining to the penalty for infractions. 3. Any person, firm, partnership or corporation or other entity violating any of the provisions of Chapter 3 or 12 of Division 2 of Title 3 of the San Bernardino County Code shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be punishable as specified in Section 1.12.020 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code." Section 4. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance or chapters adopted herein be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences and words of this Ordinance and said chapters shall remain in full force and effect. Section 5 Declaration of Urgency. The City Council hereby finds that there is a current and immediate threat to the public health, safety and welfare in that as of May 1, 2006, the County of San Bernardino will cease providing animal shelter and adoption services to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City will immediately commence to provide such services. In order to commence provision of such services, the City has heretofore adopted, by reference, the County of San Bernardino's Animal Control Regulations as the City's Animal Regulations. However, certain provisions of the San Bernardino County Code related to inspection and permitting of specified animal facilities were not adopted. The City of Rancho Cucamonga lacks the ability to conduct such inspections and permitting services, which can and will be provided by the County of San Bernardino. It is necessary in order to fully protect the public health, safety and welfare, to adopt by reference and take effect immediately, those provisions of the San Bernardino County Code specified in Section 3 of this Ordinance relating to inspection and permitting of specified animal facilities. Furthermore, in order for all of the County animal related regulations previously adopted by reference, and adopted by reference herein to have full effect within the City and be fully enforceable by the City, it is necessary that this Ordinance take effect immediately upon adoption as an urgency Ordinance. 5 ;2q/-7 11231-0001\883435vl.doc Section 6. The City Clerk shall certifY to the adoption of this Ordinance. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this _ day of ,2006. Mayor I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the _ day of , 2006, and was finally passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the _ day of , 2006, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: COUNClLMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: ATTEST: City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 cJq/-g 11231-0001\883435vl.doc THE CITY OF I "" T" ~.~"'. ....~;.. ....;~ ,.. &~-.It .~",..~A< ,'~. 't. ~',:-", ~,"".1 RANCUO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE: TO: April 19, 2006 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Jon Gillespie, Traffic Engineer CONSIDERATION OF THREE AL TERNA TIVES FOR HIGHLAND AVENUE FROM: BY: SUBJECT: RECOMMENDA TlON Staff recommends that the City Council consider three alternatives for Highland Avenue. The alternatives are as follows: 1. Open Highland Avenue for public vehicular traffic in both directions. 2. Permanently close Highland Avenue to public vehicular traffic, and install gates for emergency vehicle access. 3. Open Highland Avenue for public vehicular traffic in the westbound direction only, and provide a gated entry for eastbound emergency vehicles. BACKGROUND/ANAL YSIS In November of 1999, Highland Avenue was closed for construction of the 1-210 Freeway. During January and April of 2000, the Route 30 Ad Hoc Task Force Committee held three public meetings to discuss what should be done with Highland Avenue after the 1-210 Freeway was completed. The Route 30 Ad Hoc Task Force Committee by 5 to 4 vote recommended that Highland Avenue should be reopened in the westbound direction only, and permanently closed in the eastbound direction. The Committee also recommended that staff re-study this issue and hold a public meeting after the new 1-210 Freeway was completed. The new 1-210 Freeway was opened to public traffic on November 24,2002, and ownership of Highland Avenue was relinquished by the State to the City on April 16, 2003. The location of the closed portion of Highland Avenue is shown on the attached Figure "A". :;2q:2 Page 2 April 19, 2006 CONSIDERATION OF THREE ALTERNATIVES FOR HIGHLAND AVENUE A study of Highland Avenue has been prepared by Austin-Foust Associates, and a public workshop was held on February 21, 2006. The study prepared by Austin Foust Associates forecast that if Highland Avenue were to be reopened, that Highland Avenue would carry approximately 1,400 vehicles per day on a typical week day. Prior to the construction of the freeway, Highland Avenue carried approximately 16,000 vehicles per day. These are local trips, and the traffic volume on 19th Street, Kenyon Way and Fairmont Way is not expected to increase. This traffic projection is for a typical weekday when the freeway is not congested. The City's General Plan says the following about Highland Avenue, "Highland Avenue, an existing collector street, will serve as a frontage road for the freeway and will be reconfigured at several locations to accommodate the freeway and interchanges." Since Highland Avenue is a freeway frontage road, it is possible that if the freeway should become congested or closed for a traffic accident that traffic from the 1-210 Freeway may divert and use 19th StreeUHighland/Kenyon Way as a by-pass route. However, if Highland Avenue should be re-opened, staff could have a protocol to close Highland Avenue in the event of an incident on the freeway, and detour the traffic to Base Line Road. There is no way to predict how often or how much traffic could use Highland as a by-pass route for the freeway. The only way to determine this would be to open Highland Avenue, and to count the cars on a day that the freeway is congested. Highland Avenue and 19th Street were designed per Caltrans regional arterial standards to carry heavy truck traffic. Therefore, they can easily carry large amounts of passenger car traffic. Kenyon Way and Fairmont Way were designed to City collector street standards. Collector streets are designed to safely carry passenger car traffic, and a small amount of truck traffic. Since trucks are prohibited from using 19th Street, Highland Avenue, Fairmont Way and Kenyon Way, these streets can safely carry 12,000 vehicles per day. There are no driveways or front facing homes on Fairmont Way or Kenyon Way. In reviewing the information prepared for the Route 30 analysis and also the study conducted by Austin-Foust and Associates, staff is presenting to the City Council for Council's consideration three alternatives for the final configuration of Highland Avenue. These three alternatives are: 1. Open Highland Avenue in both directions. 2. Permanently close Highland Avenue providing emergency access in both directions. 3. Open Highland Avenue for vehicle traffic in the westbound direction only with emergency access in both directions. .2Q3 Page 3 April 19, 2006 CONSIDERATION OF THREE ALTERNATIVES FOR HIGHLAND AVENUE City Staff Findings On April 3, 2006, the Fire Department issued a memo containing their comments on the above three alternatives. Fire department staff concluded that opening Highland Avenue will significantly reduc~ response times between either sides of the wash. These same numbers suggest that response times relying on the freeway as a permanent route are uncertain and should not be figured into normal travel time due to the congestion and closures often subject to freeway travel. The Fire Department also states the use of gates and restricted access is a less than desirable situation in order to maintain reasonable response times and safety services for that area of residents. On April 5, 2006, the Police Department issued a memo indicating that Police staff had completed a study on an area similar to Highland Avenue between San Benito and Fairmont. The results of the study indicate that crime in the area between Haven and Milliken may decrease if Highland Avenue were reopened. Both of the aforementioned memos are attached to this report. Resident Survey and Response On February 8, 2006, City staff sent out a survey to approximately 3,500 residents living in the vicinity of the closed portio'n of Highland Avenue in order to conduct a poll of their opinion about whether or not Highland Avenue should be reopened. The survey area is shown on the attached Figure "B". The results of the survey were as follows: · 47% of residents responding (430) recommended opening Highland Avenue . 49% of residents responding (447) recommended permanently closing Highland Avenue · 4% of residents responding (39) were undecided Staff considered only one vote per address. Some of the surveys included from one to seven names written on the survey. John Lyons submitted 44 surveys from residents living outside of the survey area that were in support of opening Highland Avenue. These surveys were not included. The mailing list was obtained from the County Assessor's Office. The County Assessor keeps a list of the "owner of record" for each address, and this list is updated every 6 months. No effort was made by staff to identify or contact renters or "recent" home buyers. Staff has not validated the authenticity of any names or surveys. The purpose of this survey was to poll public opinion, and the results of the survey should not be construed as an "election". Staff also received a petition signed by 456 residents of a concerned citizens group indicating that they would like to see Highland Avenue permanently closed. Staff has not verified the authenticity of names or addresses shown on this petition. ;211 Page 4 April 19, 2006 CONSIDERATION OF THREE ALTERNATIVES FOR HIGHLAND AVENUE Three Alternatives Staff has prepared preliminary designs and cost estimates for each of the 3 alternatives. Figure "c" shows Highland Avenue open in both directions. Figure "D" shows Highland Avenue closed and gated at both ends. Figure "E" shows Highland Avenue open for westbound traffic and closed/gated for eastbound traffic. The cost estimates include landscaping, installing raised median islands and electric gates, pavement rehabilitation and over-lay, striped bike lanes, and constructing the master plan trail on the north side of Highland Avenue from the Deer Creek Channel to Fairmont Way. Figure "F" shows the detailed cost for Highland Avenue open in both directions. Figure "G" shows the detailed cost for Highland Avenue closed and gated in both directions. Figure "H" shows the detailed cost for Highland Avenue open for westbound traffic and closed/gated for eastbound traffic. The comparison of costs is as follows: Option 1: Highland Avenue Open in both directions: Option #2: Highland Avenue Open in closed and gated in both directions: Option #3: Highland Avenue open for westbound traffic only: $519,888 $652,487 $586,999 The pros and cons identified by staff for each of the three alternatives are as follows: Alternative # I. aDen High/and A venue to two-wav Dub/ie traffic Pros: . Opening Highland Avenue will improve emergency response times in the Victoria Groves area. From an emergency response time study prepared by the City's Fire Department, up to 4 minutes of travel time could be saved by using Highland Avenue as opposed to using Base Line Road depending on the location of responding units. . The Crime Analysis Study prepared by the Police Department predicts that the crime rate may be less if Highland Avenue is re-opened to public traffic. If Highland Avenue were opened, it would be in the constant view of the motoring public and regularly patrolled by the Police Department. . Highland Avenue is the only non-freeway, local street crossing of the Deer Creek Channel between Base Line Road and Banyan Street. Emergency services cannot depend on using the freeway as their primary emergency response route. . Opening Highland Avenue reduces travel time for residents living on the west side of the Deer Creek Channel to drive to and from the Victoria Groves Elementary School and Park. . Not all teens and senior drivers feel comfortable drivin9 on the freeway. 2q5 Page 5 April 19, 2006 CONSIDERATION OF THREE ALTERNATIVES FOR HIGHLAND AVENUE · There is no auxiliary lane on the 1-210 Freeway for westbound traffic between Haven Avenue and Milliken Avenue. · The traffic volume on 19th Street, Kenyon Way and Fairmont Way is not forecast to increase on a typical weekday if Highland Avenue were reopened. Trucks are prohibited from using these streets, and the streets were designed to safely carry a substantial amount of passenger car traffic. · There are no homes that front onto or have driveways directly onto Kenyan Way, F airmont Way, Highland Avenue or 19th Street. · Highland Avenue is designated as a freeway frontage road in the City's General Plan. · Opening Highland Avenue is the least expensive alternative. Staff estimates that opening Highland Avenue will cost $519,886. This cost includes landscaping, constructing the trail, and an overlay of Highland Avenue. Cons: · The traffic report prepared by Austin-Foust Associates forecast that traffic on Highland Avenue will increase from 0 to 1400 vehicle trips per day. · Currently, there is no traffic on Fairmont Way between Kenyon Way and Highland Avenue. This alternative will allow traffic in the area and increase traffic on Kenyon Way between Fairmont Way and Milliken Avenue. · In the event of traffic congestion of the 1-210 Freeway, traffic may exit the freeway and use 19th Street, Highland Avenue and Kenyan Way as a by-pass route. Traffic projections in the report only consider local traffic patterns. There is no way to accurately predict how much traffic may use Highland Avenue as a by-pass route if there is congestion on the 1-210 Freeway. The only way to know for certain how much traffic will use Highland Avenue is to open the road, and to then count the vehicles on a day when there is congestion on the Freeway. · The School District will need to re-evaluate the locations of their bus stops on 19th Street and Kenyon Way. Alternative #2. Permanentlv close Hk.lhland A venue Pros: o 19th Street, Highland Avenue, Fairmont Way, and Kenyon Way cannot be used a by- pass route for drivers in the event of an accident or congestion on the 1-210 Freeway. · Highland Avenue can be gated to allow access for emergency vehicles. 2q0 Page 6 April 19, 2006 CONSIDERATION OF THREE ALTERNATIVES FOR HIGHLAND AVENUE · There will be no increase in traffic volume near the residential areas onto 19th Street, Highland Avenue, Fairmont Way, and Kenyon Way. Cons: · The Police, Fire and ambulance emergency seNices cannot depend on using the freeway for emergency response due to the possibility of congestion on the freeway. A non-freeway crossing of the Deer Creek Channel is needed in between Base Line Road and Banyan Street for emergency vehicles. Highland Avenue cannot be abandoned, and will need to be maintained as a street in order to provide access for emergency vehicles. Closing Highland Avenue will require installing gates at both ends to prevent unauthorized drivers from using Highland Avenue. Radio controlled electric gates are appropriate for use at emergency entrances to private gated communities that will see limited or occasional use. They are not intended for use on a public street or on a route that will see regular use from Police, Fire and Ambulance seNices. Maintenance of the electric gates will be a constant concern for emergency seNices. · The City's ambulance seNice contractor (AMR) is not currently equipped with Emergency Vehicle Preemption (EVP) emitters to remotely open the electric gates. · Highland Avenue is a designated trail and bike route. People cannot be kept out of this area. Crime is more likely to take place in an area that is not in the constant view of the public. · Residents living on the west side of the Deer Creek Channel will have to continue to use the 1-210 Freeway or Base Line Road when taking their children to and from school. · Staff estimates that the closing Highland Avenue would be $652,487. This cost includes landscaping, constructing the trail and raised median islands, installing two electric gates, and an overlay of Highland Avenue. There will be an annual cost for the maintenance of the two gates. Alternative #3. aDen Highland A venue for westbound traffic onlv Pros: · Opening Highland Avenue in the westbound direction only was recommended by the Route 30 Ad Hoc Task Force Committee. · There is no auxiliary lane on the 1-210 Freeway for westbound traffic between Haven Avenue and Milliken Avenue. . This alternative would prevent eastbound traffic on 19th Street from using Highland Avenue as a by-pass route when the 1-210 Freeway is blocked or congested. 2q7 Page 7 April 19, 2006 CONSIDERATION OF THREE ALTERNATIVES FOR HIGHLAND AVENUE · Highland Avenue would be in constant view of the driving public, and crime may be reduced. · Residents living on the west side of the Deer Creek Channel can use Highland Avenue when returning from the Victoria Groves Elementary School and Park. Cons: · The eastbound direction on Highland Avenue will need to be gated to prevent unauthorized vehicles from using Highland Avenue. Radio controlled electric gates are appropriate for use at emergency entrances to private gated communities that will see limited or occasional use. They are not intended for use on a public street or on a route that will see regular use from Police, Fire and Ambulance services. Maintenance of the electric gates will be a constant concern for emergency services. There will be an annual cost for the maintenance of the electric gate. · Opening Highland Avenue will result in an increase in traffic volume on Highland Avenue in the westbound direction from 0 to 700 vehicles per day. · Eastbound drivers on 19th Street will need to make U-turns at San Benito. · An eastbound driver on 19th Street may drive around the gate at San Benito. Wrong way drivers may be a perpetual enforcement problem for the Police Department. . There is no way to prevent a westbound driver on Highland Avenue from making a U- turn. Therefore, a gate cannot be installed at Fairmont and Kenyon. · The City's ambulance service contractor (AMR) is not currently equipped with Emergency Vehicle Preemption (EVP) emitters to remotely open the electric gates. · Residents living on the west side of the Deer Creek Channel will have to use the auxiliary lane on the 1-210 Freeway to get to the Victoria Gardens Elementary School and Park. · The estimated cost to open Highland Avenue as a one-way street in the westbound direction and closed/gated for eastbound is $586,999. This cost includes landscaping, constructing the trail and raised median islands, installing one electric gate, and an overlay of Highland Avenue. RECOMMENDA T/ON Staff recommends Council consider the alternatives and direct staff to implement the alternative that Council feels would be the most appropriate. 2.cl rg Page 8 April 19, 2006 CONSIDERATION OF THREE ALTERNATIVES FOR HIGHLAND AVENUE R~} tfully. s... ubmitted: , (tluLL Will' m J. O'Neil City Engineer Attachments: Attachment "A": Vicinity Map Attachment "8": Highland Avenue Survey Attachment "C"; Alternative #1, Open both directions Attachment "0": Alternative #2, Closed in both directions Attachment "E": Alternative #3, Open westbound only Attachment "F": Cost estimate, Alternate #1 Attachment "G": Cost Estimate, Alternate #2 Attachment "H"; Cost Estimate, Alternate #3 Attachment "I": Fire Department Emergency Response Time study Attachment "J": Police Department Emergency Response Study Attachment "K": Police Department Crime Analysis Study Attachment "L"; Appendix, February 21 Workshop questions summary JfJq .~ K 'n! U '" ~~I""l.i .L : ~ III t;'-\- ,.- '!f'1i . -:-s-~-If7 ~ J ~ ~ ) ~ L~ ~ k I I 1 I \1 i ~., i--~J ~ I ( ~I ! I 5 ! ;,1' i; J_ [;1 -\'0 !I . I . ~ l ,I "~ \ '- /').,;- I i (' .;\1 I ' i / ~,,-, I '. . ""_'~~' . .i I I II I -I / .' t; '" armrllVl i /--/ f i I ~ '1 I . )j-'~...., I . \ 1'1 J , I 1'- I ...../T'l" '. L I ! I (. . - / ":"i ti .-- \.\)_ 1 >':;', _ iI ,\.") ,~, ~ 1\ \\\ I I ~ ; I \..>;- '~&I\' - \ \:_F\J""~ ~il t I I I ~,~ I. : I I, - -'1- - AVNa~"l1~ / \-......... / ,~ /, I ~ ""OS >} I .......... ./ 1\"- .-- l " " '" ,. ~ Ii, 1 I ""'. ~ ~ :::::s U) CU :::::s c CU :> <C "C C (U - .c C) .- ::I: - Q) "r'" J. . ~ I,,}. I~ '" """h;- DOl 1m" -Elr"tY~h' ~ - "'I []cf.l -/- "~I I 0 IR - 9-.,fivrr-tll --1z '" '" .... ..,!:t :l= /'- ,,' I ", 9' )- I f~ --g :e 0 ::> >- z "C c: v Cl~<lOO ~ ;;0 ,,- "''313"Js!, .-. I ._0- :/o.'IM.' I I I C1 I Ul>1 2~ --U. ~l ~ ~i "" . . co . . w a::: ::;) C) - LL \ I .. .' ~ I ELMHURS. A ...J; . ""-..... }. -f-1t-):; "I'." -I '"",."", ""'^""""""f I -, I ~ ,- --./ I I .,^""""~ -.-..-.-.r- UESADA--AV 1 r, ~,~ SAQA ~~ II: ~. I-'- ~,_t-:j-_J i -- J-' I:. l'lCOTW~ :t----/ I :l' , I -1/;_._ _ . I ... G N~m . I [-1-8 -...).----t,\".fJTI'i:D'- I ~ 11 I /" I \ ~ ot ti I? I -0<-' ? ! - . I ~ ~_I "" IOSAAV I 1 '--1-'- -I""'I=""",--tl-.l a..M~AV . :' 0 l;j 3tJ/ ~, ':;1 I I I, ~/' [ ii ". I, I' s: Ii ,I ~ I" I' ~ ~ I Ii~ ..j .OJ .1I1/ ~ :: ~~ ,:' "~ ~ Ii" I ~~ 1/ I I' _1-_-_-_-_--::- _ - // J / _ d01S ,f olI~ .co-=---=- ~~ -'~-L. --:'~J~\~g -=~~=::c=-=-=S1- -- ----:, ~ ------ {:; q - -"':::..~",,-";:....-~ % ...., - ---- ----..... -- - .oor - I \(./ s~------~~ II I I( II 1/ II I I II II II II Ii II II II II II II II II II 'I I ~ g d r w ~ rn J gr ~ w "' J o I I I I II 'I I, : I ~ I I ~ ,I I r II ;:;~ ~rn ~~ J QU W. ~~ U ~ Q Z '\ -, "n",", .' o z ~ ~ o :!: z ~ w ~ ~ FIGURE "e" ;jtJ2 OPTION # 1: HIGHLAND AVE. OPEN BOTH DIRECTIONS r. rn ~ ~ u "' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, , , 1\ ,~ -.." < II w ~ ~ I : < a w w z ~ ~ 00 "'~ U >-(1) ~Ij>- wu~ (5-Z ",TO wW ",> W FIGURE "D" 36,3 OPTION #2: HIGHLAND AVE. CLOSED 80TH DIRECTIONS ~ g w > ~, -il --- ~ w ~ m ~ gr; ~ w 5 I II ~II / '" II " II ~ I II ~ { /I~ .~l ~~ t- II/ 1/1, / I _ _ d01S II <ll~ ~~~~~~~==~~==~~=~--: -~-f:-ij~g - - - - -----..~ ---- - ~ " ,oor 1\( --- STop ---- Ii I; f/ I( f/ I ' II II II II II Ii II II II JI f/ " II II f/ i' i i II ,I i I ..1.8'/ , I ~ w z 5 w < OJ q -~._-------- m ~~ ~~ , <" 0" w ~ < " ~ o z -, HOTlOSt;AU; w 5 u z " i5 0 ~ 0 Z z W S l? 0 w -' ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ " D Dw "'"' 00 "'~ U ~"' z~h- wu~ D-Z ",ID WW ,,> W /' // ~ // // // // / -'"'"- /" / \ '~-~'"/ ~ /" /_//<-,/~ ./ ~ ~ \ (~/' ij// /'...- V\"'/ ?<-,<-'/ 0 Pol/€" 1\~/://.A€'f"I\1' \ / ( Af"IG \ / 5'" \ ~\f1 \\p- \ \""" \ " o \ \\ '0.' '" \ ,-.'t \ \ ~ '?- \' \ ,\ \:~! \ \ . ,,110\ '0 \\ . ,\'0 '\:' \ \\ , ,~ '0.' \\ \;-,0 0."" \ " \ II "/ II FIGURE "E" 3DL/ OPTION #3: HIGHlAND AVE. OPEN WEST BOUND ONLY CONSTRUCTION COSTS OPTION 1: HIGHLAND AVE. OPEN BOTH DIRECTIONS ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT 1 Clearino and Grubbina includina removal of Fence 1 LS $15,000.00 $15,000.00 2 AC Pavement includina sawcuttina and removal of existin 31450 SF $0.70 $22,015.00 3 Remove Curb and Gutter 100 LF $10.00 $1.000.00 4 Remove AC Berm 2780 LF $2.00 $5,560.00 5 Fill 780 CY $15.00 $11.700.00 6 Crushed Aaareaate Base 520 TON $27.00 $14,040.00 7 AC Pavement 1880 TON $60.00 $112,800.00 B Cold Plane 4310 SY $2.00 $8,620.00 9 Ad'ust Water Valve 3 EA $100.00 $300.00 10 pee Curb and Gutter 1920 LF $18.00 $34.560.00 11 landscanino 31580 SF $6.00 $189.480.00 12 PVC Trail Fence 850 LF $20.00 $17,000.00 13 Decomoosed Granite 170 CF $80.00 $13,600.00 14 T~fficSjoninoandStrioino 1 LS $4.000.00 $4,000.00 15 Traffic Control 1 LS $1,000.00 $1.000.00 16 Advance Notification 5i n 2 EA $700.00 $1.400.00 FIGURE "F" CONSTRUCTION BID TOTAL: 15"10 CONT. TOTAL: 3tJ5 $452,075.00 $67,811.25 $519,886.25 3/30/2006 CONSTRUCTION COSTS OPTION 2: HIGHLAND AVE. CLOSED BOTH DIRECTIONS ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT 1 Clearina and Grubbino includinn removal of Fence 1 LS $15,000.00 $15.000.00 2 AC Pavement includinn sawcuttinn and removal of existin 41000 SF $0.70 $28,700.00 3 Remove Curb and Gutter 100 LF $10.00 $1,000.00 4 Remove AC Berm 2780 LF $2.00 $5.560.00 5 Fill 1020 CY $1S.00 $15.300.00 6 Crushed Annrenate Base 520 TON $27.00 $14,040.00 7 AC Pavement 1760 TON $60.00 $10S.600.00 8 Cold Plane 4310 SY $2.00 $8.620.00 9 Adiust Water Valve 3 EA $100.00 $300.00 10 PCC Curb and Gutter 1900 LF $18.00 $34.200.00 11 landscaoino 37400 SF $6.00 $224,400.00 12 PVC Trail Fence 850 LF $20.00 $17,000.00 13 Dacomnn.~ed Granite 190 CY $80.00 $15,200.00 14 Traffic Sinninn and Stri in 1 LS $4.000.00 $4,000.00 15 Traffic Control 1 LS $1.000.00 $1.000.DO 16 Advance Notification Sian 2 EA $700.00 $1,400.00 17 PCG Gurb 444 LF $15.00 $6.660.00 18 PCG Cobblestone 2940 SF $10.00 $29.4D0.00 19 EntrvGate 2 EA $20,000.00 $40,000.00 FIGURE "G" CONSTRUCTION BID TOTAL: 150/. CONT. TOTAL: 360 $567,380.00 $85,107.00 $652,487.00 3/30/2006 CONSTRUCTION COSTS OPTION 3: HIGHLAND AVE. OPEN WEST BOUND ONL V ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT 1 Clearinn and Grubbinq includin removal of Fence 1 LS $15,000.00 $15,000.00 2 AC Pavement includina sawcuttina and removal of existinn 35120 SF $0.70 $24,584.00 3 Remove Curb and Gutter 100 LF $10.00 $1.000.00 4 Remove AC Berm 2780 LF $2.00 $5,560.00 5 Fill 870 GV $15.00 $13.050.00 6 Crushed Annreoate Base 520 TON $27.00 $14,040.00 7 AC Pavement 1810 TON $60.00 $108.600.00 8 Cold Plane 4310 SV $2.00 $8.620.00 9 Adiust Water Valve 3 EA $100.00 $300.00 10 pee Curb and Gutter 1910 LF $18.00 $34.380.00 11 Landscaninn 35290 SF $6.00 $211.740.00 12 PVC Trail Fence 850 LF $20.00 $17.000.00 13 Decomoosed Granite 170 GV $80.00 $13,600.00 14 Traffic Slanin and Slriaina 1 LS $4.000.00 $4.000.00 15 Traffic Control 1 LS $1.000.00 $1,000.00 16 Advance Notification 5i n 2 EA $700.00 $1.400.00 17 PGG Curb 384 LF $15.00 $5,760.00 18 pee Cobblestone 1080 SF $10.00 $10.800.00 19 Entrv Gate 1 EA $20,000.00 $20.000.00 FIGURE "H" CONSTRUCTION BID TOTAL: 150h, CONT. TOTAL: ,JtJ7 $510,434.00 $76.56S.10 $586,999.10 3/30/2006 MEMORANDUM RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Date: April 3, 2006 To: Joe O'Neil, City Engineer From: Peter Bryan, Fire Chief Subject: Highland AVenue This is the Fire District's response to issues presented at the Feb. 21 workshop regarding the issue of opening or keeping closed Highland Ave. The Fire District's over all position on the matter of emergency vehicle access is the following: In order to support the adopted Strategic Plan goal of reducing travel time to emergency incidents the city transportation infrastructure should provide and maintain a public roadway system that enables primary and secondary response routes into residential, commercial and industrial areas whenever possible. For public streets and right-of-ways discourage the installation or use of traffic calming devices, gates or other devices that could potentially increase response times. In private communities where traffic calming, gates or other devices are used that inhibit access certain mitigations shall be used such as installation and maintenance of Emergency Vehicle Preemption devices (EVP). Mitigation may also include increased built-in fire protection features such as fire sprinklers. In addition to the above statement, the following is in response to questions raised specifically regarding the Highland Ave. matter: Lack of inclusion in Strategic Plan: The Wilson Ave. extension is a major arterial route needed to reduce travel times to the far northeast section of the city. It will require a large expenditure of city funds to complete and extensive plans involving numerous agencies. While there are other areas that might be improved Wilson is the priority in terms of travel time. Response times in affected neighborhoods: Both neighborhoods impacted by this issue are in the primary response area of Fire Station 175 located on Banyan. The issue is when Station 175 is out of the station or on another call or when a multi-unit response is required (structure fire), where are those units coming from. With no cross-wash access available units must drive either south to Baseline, use the freeway or go all the way north to Banyan to cross. This situation is unique to this neighborhood. Normally units do not have to take such circuitous routes to get through neighborhoods. There are three of scenarios that can be used to model the situation. o ME175 is on a call on the east side of the wash (Victoria Groves School) and needs to respond to a neighborhood on the west side of the wash (San Benito).. Without Highland open (using l3aseline). Distance= 3.3 miles- 6 min 14 see (@32 mph) Attachment "I" 3tJrz HIGHLAND AVENUE APRIL 3, 2006 PAGE 2 With Highland open (Using Fairmont). Distance= 1 mile- 1 min 53 sec (@32 mph) . ME175 unavailable: ME171 dispatched from quarters (Amethyst & 19th) to cover a call at Victoria Groves School). Without Highland open (using Baseline). Distance= 4.1 miles- 7 min 45 sec (@ 32 mph) With Highland open (using 19th/Highland). Distance= 3 miles- 5 min 40 sec (32 mph) · ME171 responding to Victoria Groves via the 210 FWY (assuming no congestion) Distance 3.3 miles- 6 min 14 secs (speed may vary, based on 32 mph) As indicated in the comparisons above, an opened Highland Ave. would reduce certain travel times between incidents on either side of the wash. The use of the freeway as a response route is uncertain and should not be figured into normal travel time figures. Gates and restricted access: The suggestion has been made that Highland be opened for emergency vehicles only with the use of access-controlled electric gates. The following issues make this solution less than desirable for the Fire Department. Possibility of inoperability- These devices rely on continuous electrical supply and proper maintenance to operate reliably. This would set precedent for traffic calming and other travel time restrictions on public streets. Gates and traffic calming devices are permitted in some private communities. The Fire Department dissuades the use of these devices but will permit it if certain mitigations are met including the use of emergency vehicle preemption devices (EVP) and possible increased fire protection features. This is not a preferred situation for the Fire Department, however, being private property there are different levels of jurisdictional responsibility. Allowing these situations on public property would be a matter of public policy set by the governing body. Wilson Ave bIt Haven & Milliken: As comment was made about Wilson being an alternative to Highland for access. This street is too far north of the area to be a benefit to travel time in the impacted area and should not be considered as part of the solution to this matter. 3 (!)9 THE ANCnO o F UCAMONGA Memorandum DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: December 29, 2005 Jon Gillespie, Traffic Engineer Bill Lenew, Lieutenant Police Department HIGHLAND AVENUE On December 19, 2005, we met to discuss the Highland Avenue road closure. You . asked me to prepare a response from a Law Enforcement perspective as to whether the road should remain closed or be reopened. The primary issue for the Police Department regarding Highland Avenue remaining closed is response times. If a patrol officer is in the area of San Benito Avenue and 19th Street and received a call for service in the area of Fairmont Way and Kenyon Way (or visa versa) the response time would be much greater than if Highland Avenue were open. On Tuesday, December 27, 2005, at about 9:00 a.m. a patrol officer drove her car from San Benito Avenue to Haven Avenue, north to the 210 Freeway, east to Milliken Avenue, south to Kenyon Way and west to Fairmont Way in approximately four minutes. She than traveled a southern route from San Benito and 19th Street across Base Line Avenue to the same ending point at Kenyon Way and Fairmont Way in approximately nine minutes. Both trips were made with light traffic conditions. If Highland Avenue was open the travel time would have been approximately 30 seconds. . Generally, the shortest distance between two points is a benefit to Law Enforcement and serves to achieve the quickest response time. It seems reasonable to believe that with Highland Avenue open from 19th Street to Kenyon Way the Rancho Police Department would achieve this objective Attachment "J" 3/6 MEMORANDUM ENGINEERlNG DEPARTMENT Date: RANCHO CUCAMONGA April 5, 2006 Jon Gillespie, Traffic Engineer Bill Lenew, Lieutenant Police Department Subject: CRIME ANALYSIS STUDY FOR HIGHLAND AVENUE To: From: On February 28, 2006, you requested a crime analysis study for the portion of Highland Avenue between Haven Avenue and Milliken Avenue, and an opinion from the Police Department on whether the re-opening of Highland Avenue would increase the crime rate. In order to accomplish this task, we looked at the crime history for the portion of Highland Avenue between Milliken Avenue and Rochester Avenue. This segment of Highland Avenue was closed for the construction of the 1-210 Freeway on December 1, 1999, and was re-opened on June 8, 2002. We then compared the crime history for the 31 month period when Highland Avenue was closed with the crime history for the 31 month period after Highland Avenue was re-opened. What we found was that the total crime rate decreased by 13.3% after Highland Avenue was re-opened. There were a total of 1,754 incidents of crimes reported during the 31 month period while Highland Avenue was closed, and 1,520 incidents of crimes reported in the 31 months after it was re-opened. The study area was bordered by Highland Avenue on the north, Base Line Road on the south, Milliken Avenue on the west, and Rochester Avenue on the east. Please refer to the attached spreadsheet for a complete breakdown by crime types and traffic incidents. The configuration of Highland Avenue between Milliken and Rochester is very similar to the portion of Highland Avenue between Haven and Milliken that is currently closed. Therefore, based on the fact that the crime rate decreased after Highland Avenue was re-opened between Milliken and Rochester, we would assume that the crime rate for the area between Haven and Milliken may decrease if Highland Avenue is re-opened. Attachment "K" 311 ... .E tIJ (.) CI) ~ c ~ CI) (I) >.... <c m "C.c c to) .!& "E,"C .- E: J: C'G E: (1) ~ .- - - .- +:::E tIJ +:: c C'G (I) .... (I) ~! E (I) ._ m ~ o .. "e "e #. . . tIl .... .... '" J!! ..: N ,.; c '" .... .... .. .. I:! '" c .. l!! D. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ S <0 ~ .... co 0> .... .... ... .... U> ~ 0 '" '" '" '" '" ... 0 .... '" ~ .... ~ .... .... CO ... Q iii '" ~ ~ '" '" ::s - '" c( .... .... .... 0 00 .... '" '" .... .... 0 '" '" '" 0 .... '" ... CO ... U> .... ... '" '" '" '" .... '" CO '" .... .... ~ ... .... 0> .... II!. CO ..... .... Q 0:: U> CO U> .... ... U> .... N .". .... '" U> CO CO .... '" 0 .... ... ... .... .... .... CO '" '" '" .... .... '" <D 0 '" ... ..... ... ..... .... .... .... .... "!. "':. CO .... .... ..... Q 0:: ...J I~ ...J ...J ~ i:!: i:!: 0 Ig 0 0 l- I- I- ... ... D. 0 Q UJ .. oll .. Z <.> UJ i:i .. c: c C3 Ul 0. .. 0 .. :;;: >- ::l 0. $ Cl .. - 0:: f! >- .. ::s Qj E .. - '5 '" > Ul t1l 0:: c: $ ~ .. D. ~ III '" .. '" C) .c 'Iii .. '" $ III '" .c 0 " c: '" <( 1:: l- I!! c: - - III 'C: == E .. 0 'S: '" ... c c: .. ... - 8- ... III .. ::l ::l '" .. .. 1; ~ .. .. .~ 0 .Q 0 t1l ... 0:: 0 0.<.> C3 'C: t1l t1l a; " 'E '0 +:; .c ~ c: lfl <( .. .. c: '" c: :;;: '5 0 c: ~ t1l 0 t1l a:: .c .. E ::l .. .. 0::: () lfl () ::::l '5 a:: .. c( ~ ~ I- .. .!!l 0- > Ul :> E E ._ III '" <.> .. '0 C) .. '0 >- Qj CO CO >- Qj .2 E c: ~ 0:: 32 .. c: E .. c: .. ::l e> e> c: Gl '0 o.::l .. - <.> .. 'S: C) E 0 '0 X 0 '0 c: III <.> '5 ~ 'C ::l a; III a; '" .. 0. 'C: 0 ~ .. ::l ::l ~ ~ ::l ... {jj l- I- a:: (/) 0 () c( u. (/) lD lD U. (/) 'u Attachment "L" 312 ~ :8 :l i3 ~ .. o () " co .'!! "" .S!> :r: Q; E .. <: ,!! it' ~ .. .. 'li o Il:: " co .. i ;i!; ~ co .. l .. .Q !i q: " co .'!! "" ~ :r: - o S " o '" " o o ~ .Q "" .~ ~ " '" ~ Attachment "M": February 21, 2006, Highland Avenue Workshop Questions Summary The February 21, 2006, workshop was attended by approximately 300 residents. Some of the concerns expressed by residents at the meeting, and staff's responses are as follows: 1. How can you be certain that the traffic volume on Highland Avenue will be 1400 vehicles per day if Highland Avenue is reopened, and that the traffic volume on 19th Street, Kenyon Way and Fairmont Way will not increase? The Consultant, Joe Foust, has 40 years experience as a Traffic Engineer and Transportation Planner. Mr. Foust has examined the existing traffic volumes, the existing configuration of streets, the location of freeway on and off ramps, the location of schools, and commercial centers, and has made his best educated "guess" at what traffic will do if Highland Avenue should be reopened. The only way to know for certain what will happen is to open the road and then count the cars. 2. Ifthere should be an accident of the 1-210 Freeway between Haven and Milliken, and the freeway were to be closed, could traffic use 19th Street to Kenyon Way to get around the accident? This is possible. If Highland Avenue is re-opened, the City will make a frotocol that in the event of a full freeway closure, that City forces will close 191 Street, Highland Avenue and Kenyon Way between Haven and Milliken, and direct traffic down to Base Line Road. 3. If traffic on the 1-210 Freeway becomes congested, could drivers use 19th Street and Kenyon Way as a by-pass route? This is always a possibility. Travel time is the most important consideration when trying to predict driver behavior. If a driver thinks that they can save time by getting off the freeway and using surface streets, then they will. 4. If traffic on the 1-210 Freeway becomes congested, how much traffic will use 19th Street, Highland Avenue, and Kenyon Way? First, there are many levels of traffic congestion. Freeway traffic can be slow, stop and go, bumper to bumper and stopped. It is not possible to predict how much traffic will divert to local City streets from the 1-210 Freeway in the event of traffic congestion. The only way to know for sure would be to open Highland Avenue and to observe traffic patterns on a day when the 1-210 Freeway is congested. We can only "predict" traffic patterns for days when there is free flowing traffic on the freeway. 5. Were 19th Street, Highland Avenue, Kenyan Way and Fairmont Way designed to handle the traffic volume if Highland Avenue should be reopened? 3/3 19th Street and Highland Avenue were designed to carry heavy truck traffic, and can therefore carry a substantial number of passenger vehicles. Kenyon Way and Fairmont Way were built to the City's collector street standard, and can easily carry the forecast local traffic volume plus a substantial number of passenger vehicles. Trucks are only allowed on designated City streets. Trucks are not allowed on 19th Street, Highland Avenue, Kenyan Way between Haven and Milliken. There are no driveways or front facing homes on Fairmont Way or Kenyon Way. 6. Could traffic congestion occur on Kenyon Way if a lot of traffic from a congested freeway decides to use Highland Avenue as a by-pass route? In the event of traffic exiting a congested freeway, and using local City streets as a by-pass route, congestion could occur at the all-way stop signs at the intersection of Kenyan Way and Fairmont Way. The maximum theoretical volume of an intersection with one lane in each direction and all-way stop signs is 720 vehicles per hour. This is based on one vehicle crossing the intersection every 5 seconds. If traffic demand exceeds 720 vehicles per hour, then traffic would start to back up at the stop signs. 7. How often is the 1-210 Freeway congested, and will it become more congested in the future? This is a judgment call because congestion is a subjective term. We do know that there will be a lot of new development in the future in San Bernardino County, and that the traffic volume on the 1-210 Freeway is expected to increase in the future. 8. Won't traffic safety at Victoria Groves Elementary School be impacted if Highland Avenue were reopened? The traffic volume on Fairmont Way adjacent to the Victoria Groves Elementary School is not expected to increase if Highland Avenue should be reopened; therefore, there is no traffic safety impact. Any eastbound and westbound through traffic from outside of the area will use the shortest and fastest route through the area to save travel time. This route would be 19th Street to Highland to Fairmont to Kenyon. Using Fairmont Way, south of Kenyon Way would be "backtracking", and would increase a driver's travel time. Therefore, we do not predict that this will occur. The only traffic that will be using Fairmont Way at the Victoria Groves Elementary School is the same local traffic that is currently going to and from the school, and this traffic will be there regardless of whether or not Highland A venue is opened or closed. g. If Highland Avenue is opened, the existing bus stops along 1 gth Street and on Kenyon Way will no longer be safe. 3.1L/ The locations of bus stops are determined by the school district. If Highland Avenue is opened, City staff will work with the school district to make sure that the locations of school bus stops are safe. 1 O.lf Highland Avenue is opened, will it be unsafe for children to walk to and from Victoria Groves Elementary School? Fairmont Way and Kenyon Way have curbs and sidewalks. Crosswalks and school crossing waming signs have been installed as required. The traffic study does not predict that the traffic volume on Fairmont Way south of Kenyon Way. will increase if Highland Avenue is opened, even if there is traffic from the 1-210 Freeway using Highland Avenue as a by-pass route. 11.lf Highland Avenue is opened, there will be a 90 degree bend in the road where Highland meets Fairmont Way. Is this unsafe? The City currently has 90 degree bends at 3 locations. These locations are Highland at Woodruff, Wilson at Milliken, and Wilson at Etiwanda. For many years there was a 90 degree bend at Rochester at Banyan. There have not been a significant number of traffic accidents at any of these locations that would suggest that they are unsafe. 12. Highland Avenue has been closed for 6 years. Why is Highland Avenue suddenly needed now? Highland Avenue was temporarily closed for construction of the 1-210 Freeway in November of 1999. Highland Avenue was not relinquished to the City by the State until April of 2003. In April of 2000, the Route 30 Ad Hoc Task Force directed staff to restudy the issue and hold a public meeting prior to bringing this item to the City Council for consideration. A study was begun in July of 2005, and public meeting was held in February of 2006. 13.lf Highland Avenue is important for emergency response times, why isn't it mentioned in the City's Fire Department's Strategic Plan? The purpose of the Fire Department's Strategic Plan is to look at goals and objectives for response time, manpower, equipment, stations, cost, and funding to provide emergency services for the entire community. Wilson Avenue is specifically identified in the City's Strategic Plan because it will require a major capital investment in the millions of dollars to construct, and it is critically needed to serve as the primary emergency response route for the Etiwanda Area. Highland Avenue is not mentioned in the Strategic Plan because it is an existing roadway, and it is not a ''primary'' emergency response route. Emergency services support having multiple routes available because having multiple routes is beneficial to emergency response time. 14. Why can't emergency vehicles use the freeway instead of Highland Avenue? 3/5 In the event of an accident or congestion on the freeway, emergency vehicles need to have multiple alternate routes. The Victoria Groves area is unique in that the Deer Creek Channel is a physical barrier that splits the Victoria Groves area in half. Except for Highland Avenue, the only other places where this channel can be crossed is Base Line Road, 3,500 feet to the south and Banyan Street, 3,500 ft to the north. When an emergency is reported, Police and Fire units respond from the nearest location. There needs to be a non-freeway crossing of the Deer Creek Channel between Base Line Road and Banyan Street for emergency vehicles. 15. Why can't radio controlled, electric gates be installed on Highland Avenue? Radio controlled electric gates are appropriate for use at emergency entrances to private gated communities that will see limited or occasional use. They are not intended for use on a public street or on a route that will see regular use from Police, Fire and Ambulance services. Maintenance of the electric gates will be a constant concern for emergency services. 16. Why is Highland Avenue needed for emergency response? Why can't emergency vehicles use Wilson Avenue instead? Banyan Street is approximately 3,500 ft (3/4 mile) north of Highland Avenue, and Wilson Avenue is 5,800 ft (1.1 mile) north of Highland Avenue. The connection of Wilson Avenue to Milliken Avenue has been of great benefit to emergency response time for the Deer Creek and Haven View Estates areas. However, it is too far away from the Victoria Groves area to replace Highland Avenue or to benefit emergency response times for that area. 17. How much is crime expected to increase if Highland Avenue is opened? Has the Police Department prepared a crime analysis report for Highland Avenue? It is the opinion of the City's Police Department that crime may decrease if Highland Avenue is re-opened. A crime analysis study was prepared by the Police Department for Highland Avenue between Milliken and Rochester. Highland Avenue between Milliken and Rochester was studied because the configuration of the street is very similar, and it was closed for 31 months during construction of the 1-210 Freeway. The study found that there were 13% fewer incidents of crime in the 31 months after Highland was reopened, than there were during the 31 months while it was closed. 18. Will Highland Avenue become a haven for street gangs, drugs, graffiti, and drag races if Highland Avenue is opened? In the opinion of staff, Highland Avenue between Haven and Milliken will look a lot like Highland Avenue between Milliken and Rochester. Highland Avenue between Milliken and Rochester has not become a haven for street gangs, drugs, graffiti, or drag races. Therefore, Highland Avenue between Haven and Milliken is not expected to become a crime infested area. 3/~ IlIO ..-:::- ~ -- ~.fot .,,"..--' 1--_ " - - - !:i I 1=:_ '-;:'i..,.- - ~~}F':'f,H~~4"~~ ; U~"-"";J<~-:'~~'R :i~--:'~-::: :-- J:'~:.ti~~,__~: ".- 1~[i~ ~~~~.q~d~-"-~ 19/Highland Avenue Survey ~~~::;';~~73 ,~1\f~~PgiT r~A; ,,"". "'m~iI'Ji\i~~~;'; "~j~~"'''t,,*,c5'tb,,\ p::c~'->'>- 1E~ ,~1t~~,;:l~:;;?%lf: ":'f,-i;/:~e-""'~~'":$:)rL~;; "t: ~... "'"'- .. l~~.~... L"L__ ~~ IQ 1::: . 1[1 _lao-d-........_A_; =_.''-'1 . ~ ~ ,-J'!- . _-'-~ --, -....lti _ -: rn....-- ~ '''-~-r---~ ~~-=\- ..' - - ~;';:'8li,E%; ~_..:>"'..,,-~ "..~ .'L /' -- i!\2m,'" .~ . - - ;'..-'- lE;<m~,. .:", -= ~,:;; ..~ ~ /~>!f/.'i1 ~I . '-- -- ~Ht "~.~;::J,1;,. "~~_~-I::;""~,,.;;;;.~t;_. . ,'i3tt~ .. t .'1 __"' o~ ~ 'H_ ......."'"':.~.-~~~~ . ~ ~~;;':~5;' __ - ",c. ~~a _' ~~-':i~!<r',I:'....;-"~~.,;, r_""~"~l:--';''''iD' \f41mtv~..?t-',4.:-4I:O: 't:i'~L . j: -~~' -~-Si.~"-~----<l~c""'"""~'t,~'.;;;:~,;-. "'~""~".~~O ...' . -"'~ -'~'jl"" rr!c-'>'i~;l'~"'''-~Aj':-':,'',1fil' .~. 'c'.";i;l1~ - . .-- 1 a:" ~f::~ l."'~ ,-<%lU' ~. ~ ,.t:~ f '; "" "l3':~~~'!'I' ~~:f,~ifl" fiL<""~ ;';' ../;';-i~Hl :jJt;~~;i:"t~~lI ~mti .' :~~,~ fi{. ~~r."\~. ~r:J;. ,r--r~i~ J'f.'1/Jhc. <t~\\\.'p " . , . ' ,"1iilc"'-i!;;;c ""."",.::'f~' 'fiiJ,"''''''~ "",:~.'j~Yit... "" ",""~J,.,~,__ . .~, '\rn\~' i ....-.._..c1+-{t-;'.~-L.~~B - .", :~}.~.~2:~.s:: ~';!..... -:.......;~~--.t.-.r;,)..:+1.c.r I ~",,' ~ - ..m~.t~lI~-';';' .... L.. ~ 'JL~i9; ~~i~~,~.-~:i=l: ~-~'. HX~~~.. I '.: , I;, ~c;.-"~ft?l,-f,ji'"' ~. '~'fj,'fi!:!fI,,,"~h_.,~:=,>, . - c)\ =.'" ~"-'M-""l:t ' ')1 ::.~~ffiJ_~,. r l:: t;o-.. . ........Hr-.:..... .~~'l;-~1 ... '.'0":;;; ., .;.,~ '-0. ..... - . . ~ n" e.... .,,~;t~, 'J" . '" e.. It lmjmtf6~~ 1'T -m_~Ll~~,~ ::':1 ~pj - ....:::;.~ I ~..:;::.;'l~'~~.' ~'1J~}~i~-qjit ~i ~~~~~~~ !!!t~:)T1if~ii~""" ~j;;:'-~Ilk _ - ~ ~b,:~?ir~~~~~~t~ t~"!'~.:i~~';;~~!ft~;.-~fafTf?;~~\. l .~ " -;-,':::E'f.:.~--I ..,.~ ~ ::-1' j'1t!:~-:.~ .~~:;~, '~-,~"1'~.~ """::;I.~:.J.I:";...;l~,f"A"/"~ <""'>~'-', ~ :: J::'R'~:1~"":r1'R;i'J~:-t'-. - '.\-'",~'~~~~ii'%,l;%' ';~,,;f~[; ~: Fk f; .~<~~'.'A:~;l FIGURE "A" ~.,\~~~;"'=:;;('rk.. ~~:~;; g. ~~. ~ r'~1=:.~~\~' _. ~__ _ .. ~ r~- ~ \$~:..~, g$11~-5 s .n.4Jd .... . ... . - - Closed in November 1 999 - Route 30 Task Force meetings - Committee recommendation - Freeway opening November 2002 - City rook ownership April 2003 - Public Workshop February 2006 /.' --',1' ., . "- ' , . _ ~jJ.,'-r ".... " _1,'. . . f '~. , ___ ... _-',-" '.6' : "_'----'1 . i r r-,. . - - - - - . . Cotl:eetolf Streets _....,.... w_ .___...... .. ----- ~~IiIB<i1 iE!e 4,000 - 1 (i)~~OO \l~IB-$J_ ry~~ClI1!faf!fi.[ "<:tlYm.@s: . -. - ~~qlil, ~@f'kMilIUgerr\ 'W Q,f).0~ ~ - ~~/r:l'lI~~tlfb- Lemol'll '"" 1,1~ !::l -lelililf2.(rl': lFfer.I!fl05.a - ~@flJ "'.J/tll,} ~, - ~~miJi~ I!lafl}{all - Wj~@ ,. ~J,8..;j '= - <'5?J~ _10> - ~fl'Jl'iW}~a( IrNr1aA!! - \l6i:l~ 'S ~~4 __ _ ~ .,. iii - 1:1" c- ~ - . . - Multiple routes - Cannoe depend on 2 10 fwy - Highland: only non-fwy crossing ~ - Gaees slow response Crjme rates I I . .~.-Il":.;C~~ 5,!t. . .~ .~... . t.' I. ....7...'1\.""'="-. ~~. l-\' "i ~..l.~ :"J'.~::~;':_\ J. ~t.~\fi.1 .~ .. . :_.$_ia .- . .,,,,, ~ :;<; a'- H" .':oe",!-~ ... . -....-. <- :..... ..'. "..-.'.' .. ~. -. . ~. ~~~:.j...4:.~ . l-C ,.-~a:.'~ --~ .~~I.......- 1..-....."'. · ~~...r.:.'\ .-.... Ie ~ . -. ' . . I ,,_ ~..- .... t.. I,. . '1 . . ." I . . ... ~, . . . ..,. . . ..__ a:. .._.1 -.,. . ..... ....:..aI. -, c.c...v.a'_" ~. ~... ~ =v' .' ..~. .-:7- '''''-<.... .J i. " ....'" ... -. . . . - ~""'.'i{-" ......1.... .. .~: \ .., ... . -.\. .!I-,.~ ,... "~ , .-... .~ . - - ,-,: -. . .. . . - .. . .. --r.- . J") ,... ."....... ~""'".~ .. .. ~- -- ''''''''' l . l . .. .. .. ~. ..\ - . - . . .. .- - ~ "",,"" . '. " .. _.-. . . .' .. / , .. , ~ < ~ ,.",..- , ! J__.'_'. , , ,- ~. . . r. . ~.; ; 19/Highland Avenue Survey , , 1 ._.... , , I . ~ . II f : t ) ~., _ ; ~"_ t ! ~ t ~....:..._~. , . . , , ~"'-,..- r.",,",, . - .. l -- , .....L .. . . ; .. , , '- .. ., - . .1 .,. I.' , .. .. .. . . ....,"'~ .. .....-'.:T .. - " , , . . . I" : ~ I ~ ~ . , ......n'....." , .- , - . . .. -.........;:. .. , .. .. . .~.-' . . . ! . ,':-- -. .. 1 , ; . i , j , \ . I t , ~:""""'" <. " -"-'':. ..- ...,....~ -.'-'-", " ""4. ~ .- ...... , .. , '00.....- , . . t , . -. ~ .- , \ \ \ , , . . , , , " 'i , .. - -'-' '.. . , . . " n I r .. .. . , , , , { ..? . , 1 .. . .. ...;....ti . , I . . Survey Results Approximately 3,500 surveys mailed, . 91 6 returned lj 47% (430) -> Open Highland 49% (447) -> Close Highland 4%(39) > Undecided "i .......".....__ 4>.&<."-"" -~.... //'''---, \ - ~~~- -----~ -,I .-....;::;,. !-:=:~~~_:;ZL-zt ___:_~;.:_~ /~" . -~ _~;;_I~~F"-----'/;-~''T-'';;~ - ~~ -r;..--h ~::i-/-' - ",-",'-/ -- '- - , ",,",-- f. ..~ _, ._~ , /: ~ ~~. - - I , , :% ;$'- '--- .. I ~".>' ~---- .,...,' ,,~~:":./'. ) ':, i HI ~-0"~:'>-\~\ \~\ ~[~:..-. I ...-----TTI~ ~:':f:"" ,,~~'~ / :ii'j ;,ol'fr' ( il:', <<)',;-- "'--... --'f/ ._.;._,,-:;._~=--~/JJI~___ ' '4~,~ --- ~..:-..:---...... __..\__:..:-:.';:::;~~: / - =--- , .:"'--j R~~ . ~r: f:7~^- .--/ "/7': I, 0, 111""~ ,,~ / , I "II I j;,;;:;~L~..,,,",, \ / I I '""n I I :r ~l: I :::'::___...,;1 /t-___ ~-J -~---- 'J-/.' - _.._..~.._---.J .\--------~., ,i'~--'--~ "r., IL '_ ., .4j--~r..-~ -'-. :' ----.. -~- ...-- . -n " c: " m . " . .. " ,- " ~~ "l ~ 0' " ( / II I 4"'~ ,.~~ , . , I , Alternative J: 0 en Hi hland Avenue PROS: - Best emergency response times - Provides multiple access routes - Possibility of less crime - Reduces local travel times - Streets can safely carry traffic - $520,000 cost 11 , f'~-" IV ,.<-.........- ].........;::::,. . i- \ . '.:=:...._ __~~~___<' 't;<>..A.f""'" .- . ~. +. _ ,_ o. - - ~~~.....~. -. ~.;~--- ..~-. l' ~T-_. ~~. -"'J:~' -- ;;ii~~J~~----~~::::::""--- t--" \~'-<.I~~,," t~..., '~....._ .- I -j" _U ~ ~. .-......'!''"'\- .-.',,,.,,,..,,.. 'I' " ~.... ~",-,--- , ,. < ~.. I , \ ~:..1~~~..t>;-. / ':.~ U1' Y-'~:-;f~:;'/ '\' \\ l~CU;O " I /" /:: ,,\,~ ~~~ ~"&~ \" / ....y'Y \ /!~"f '-... ,.r,~ /, _ ____ <//}/ ~----.... ( / , .r.r,_ ''''',~ I ..:J!f'-. ~':->&: =.- ~...;:-~- ~--- , --"..... ,:0 ---;-=~ "II'~'>- ~,!:_,.r_.~ I" " "" 0.<:...... ..,---- " ( ,~ "~~;,j , ::o.c.' -"'-]71 :.~J ., , . -'~~_:':-b_~ ..';, ", .<rl~""",. I -"ri+/:::; I I ~ --- -- - ----- " I t.7.-...- - _. I----------~./' - - ~...--.:! ,tll-,~, ' ';,,''fw;;r-~~~~"7 r ,'.., ..... ~ -n G> C ::0 m . " . I ~ O~D - II ! ~ , . I! " " . I I , Alternative 2: Close Hi hland Avenue CONS: - Installation of gates will hamper emergency response times - City's ambulance seNices do not carry EVP emitters - Crime rate may be higher - Local traffic will have to use frwy - $653,000 + annual maintenance I,! _~ " "_..n.,"",-_>~'W\-,> - """"""""';'':.''''':'''''-"'"B /'I~'~h...._ -~-=1\ ~__ ' \. ,..--. - -.. - , ~ - --; ...-.........W-.-.....Wr_ I --J - -.......0--~-- ........1> I ~ ,-~ _J._-_:"--~=-~t; '- ;.,,__ :,\7~~='"_"-- 11 +; i ~~) i I /-.If\~' ~;{:;j:':;~\\---:- ~c~ I ( /IU:' :,',: '4/;./~ \\\~~ ~10:',,\. . . --"}'.L_ ' ',. ~ -~.---"'~-- Z.-"-'?cl ,r,i:;':// ~/ :::-----.-.. ___h___~';_-"I ,zy' ~~.;;,~. ""'. ~!W23"~ ~iCl: ::;'1 rt)'" ~ ~~'fl:'... _/ ~',; *j__..,....... 1.=, '_ , ;-" , ""'-l'Q'C'" /., , 12.,~~. ! j: fl' ....... /-"'>,: '--- J. ,~. "'.~! \ /'. , . , ...~ / - It:::.: --- ",.. -* /' H-~' \.. \--~--~---~ff+!z-,,r , _ ":.___~..__~~ .~#> - .' .,~,.. .\ ~ \-- -- . --'------.0.; //' ....~ " , ........-. I, 'i__ , _----, ,/ '.- . ..... -. , 'c' __~.~_~~_ ./'-..." 'Z. \ \"" \ 'I,i-;-r 1.- ~_.. ~'/ \,\ '. \\/ -'-'-~ '.0.- "-... I \/ '....,:.;.: --------=~ ~\~_.> ..- ~~ " G) C ;0 m . "l ~ !l .. .;- ~~ t, ~~ . , f , . , I , Alternative 3: 0 en Westbound Onl PROS: - Recommended by Route 30 Ad Hoc Task Force - No AUX lane for Wj8 210 fwy - Prevents Ej8 traffic on 19th Street - Only 1 gate needed - Emergency vehicle drive around - Crime may be reduced Alternative 3: 0 en Westbound anI CONS: - Installation of gates undesirable & effects emergency response time - City's ambulance services do not carry EVP emitters - EjB drivers illegally drive around gate - EjB local traffic will have to use fwy - $ 586,000 + annual maintenance - - Legal Status I I - Existing legal status - Legal requirements for future actions I - - - - . I - - - --."." . ._,.,.,"-" ' ~~,.'.. ....-'.. - . .. . . - . . I - I .... " ~.:- ..... .. - - - - - - - iil c _ - , . ~ ~ . . - -- ....... -- -- -- --- - - $ - -- ~~ ~~ - - , "- .-., , - ..'. ., ,,~'-' ~I"';- .' .. , , ..~ -I' .,:".11, '- ~. . .' . < < ~ ..... . . ~, - - ~ . I . '1 . -. . ,'I t, \ '. II Ill; 1:111 11:II .. ICII ...:, I( - .Ilo' . a--- - - ... . .. . ~ r . - - .. .. ~. Jt1~ ..,'. . . , 1:": ~ ~ ~- '-'_.'-.~',- '''. -ce., . If:'~~'~:";""" ~'. . ,-:-~'... - , 'i<....~ ,,-,,''';: -'. - .. . - - - -- c"".,. ,.. - - -- -- - ~ - . - - ....... -- -- mGHLAND ROAD CLOSURE LIST OF SPEAKERS AND TOPICS FOR APRIL 19TH COUNCIL MEETING With the Mayor and Council's permission, the fonowing speakers would request to present to council in the order listed below. 1). Alan Hostetter - Discussion of 1998 MOU agreement 2). Jane Bradshaw - Discussion of Route 30 Task Force Meetings from the perspective of a Task Force member. Discussion of her firsthand knowledge oCthe MOU agreement and promise to keep the road closed. 3). Steve Renteria - Perspective of resident who attended Route 30 meetings regularly and his first hand knowledge of the MOU agreement and original promise. 4). Holly Renteria - First hand knowledge of traffic problems at Victoria Groves Elementary from daily observation. 5). Karen Paizan - Additional insight regarding school traffic patterns at VGS. 6). Daniene Non - Concerns regarding kids routes to school and traffic problems at VGS (a mother's perspective). 7). Norma Casas - Discussion of traffic problems at VGS, particularly the York Street entrance. Discussion of her nephew's traffic accident while walking home from VGS on May 8, 2002. 8). Mike Kerns - Firefighters perspective regarding response times and public safety issues. 9). Kevin Bogart - Street racing and dangers of the 90 degree turn at Fairmont and Highland. A law enforcement perspective. 10). Jennetta Harris - Freeway bypass traffic issue. 11). Lynn Whipp - Discussion of home purchase and real estate documentation including SANBAG advisory. 12). Mr. Charles Schultz, Attorney at Law - current status of road and legal issues. ---.---",,"~ -~ IL :t voters' lues right in that t 6 in Pomona, e to see through be an election lOW whoever 6 seat until nage. members are so es they would neane opposite ) undo all the silence the peo- the majority ;' direction for 1 the special Jld go to the on who would lther council ot want the z';:; pastor to deals to the ?r Pomona Uni- loyee'rubber' ~z wan tf;, 'esentat.1ve who. .omona police miform, hadge ley were on the 6 do see thsppgh DON FORD Pomona o council >>omona lC Pomona City ecision in call- o fill the vacant of calling for an , that the council t:lerson to take ~jl the November ifications of "Ithough I do i feel there are tledge and expe- ,he position. .6 will be al- ght to vote - in we talked to 19rees that the C'ly. TIle council [1 this immedi~ BETH BROOKS Pomona I election' pay Iv Bulletin edi~ ~iy nrge the resi- md an election strict 6 council eople have 8acri~ it of democracy cess, But here, Illcil doesn't ing people to 'Iltation is all in their infinite t.han happy to B (perhaps an- )10)'(;0 would suf. 's assertion tlmt II only fletve , rea~ol1ing, as. thanced ability s dramatically '1 incumbent's is a sTIlnll one to emocral.ie dt\'. So I sav 'oI'~es and Conn- for continuing on. The citizens nost. basic of ~MAN-HENSEN PomonA ... 'M.~'7'>''''''''""' .-~. mlKlll1llM PIIIN I'OOSfWl! "-.. Sanctuary lunacy won't help city of "omona I CQuld not believe my eyes when I read the article regarding Councilman Robles asking Pomona to stand against HR 4437. Not only is he asking city residents to break the law by not upholding the current immigration laws, but he's asking them to break another law by aiding and abetting illegal immi- grants by employing them, against federal law. This man needs to have his head examined. Asking the citizens of Pomona to .break current federal laws is like Pomona shooting itself in the foot. After all, the cities are extensions of the states, states extensions of our country, etc. And when Robles is sug~ gesting that it would further burden the city's Police Department, I don't see where that is the case, I'm sure the federal government isn't asking local police staff to cruise around the city as though they are INS inspectors. I would assume that they would address the legal status of an indi- vidual if for any reason they are questioned by the police. \\Thy is Robles concerned about people or organizations that aid un~ documented immigrants being prose- cuted as smugglers? These people or organizations wouldn't be prosecuted as smugglers unless someone is aid- ing and abetting those individuals here illegally, or in other words, those committing a crime. You can't sayan one hand, don't break our city or state laws. and on the other hand, send the message that it's OK to break our federal laws, And if Robles doesn't realize that. h~ has no business being on the City Council to begin with. The statement that if the council approved Pomona as a sanctuary city would be sending the wrong message is an understatement. That's all Pomona needs, They might as well put up bill- boards saying, "Come to Pomona: Even if you hreak the law, you'll be accepted and tolerated," How is this type of lunacy going to turn the city of Pomona around from its current problems? I think it would only add to them. YOLANDA GUTIERREZ Upland Pull off freeways during routine traffic stops Readiug about the loss of another police officer to 8 traffic collision by a drunken driver just breaks my heart, So many innocent lives have been lost on our freeways because they have pulled over and become victims of tragedy. Can we not have CHP officers pull peo- ple otHhe freeway to the next. off-ramp? Pulling over for any reason on OUf heavily traveled freeways puts motorists in dan- ger. - \Vhenever there is a traffic stop on the freeway, traffic backs up for miles be. cause of the interest factor, Personally, I have driven on and ruined a tire just to . make it off the freeway. Surface streets may also have hazards, but I'll take a vehicle passing by at 35 mph versus 75 mph any day. Godspeed to Officer Bailey. DAN CENTURIONl Alta Lorna Evolution is no'll:lhiing but a bouncing Iball Is it gratifYing to know that tiny cosmic dust balls caught and recently conveyed to Earth may be the answer to life, ac- cording to those involved in old bones and super flights ~ evolutionists. And so it would naturallv follow that out of those microscopic du~st balls the tree oflife \"ould evolve, and eventually the ape man. Enough of Darwin (son of a man ofthe cloth, minister of the gospe]) and to the truth: King David said of God's creation that man was "... fearfullyanq wOl1der. fully made" (Psalm 139:t4}." C.;' '. . Isn't it overplnvering to know that there are many people of superior knO\vl- edge who will never, ever belieye the big lie of organic evolution? For the chos~n of the Lord, it, is said, "Ye shall know all things" (1 John 2:201. We can finally summarize evolution as nothing more than an erratic, uncon- trolled bouncing ball. Who knows where it will go next. and stop, but stop it will. Nothing in this world happens by chance. Not. only does the world as a whole testify to the beaut.y, glory and power of creation, but the very dust itself: The elements complising the human body are exactly the same as those in the ground. . To summarize the solid truth we have what God said to Adam: "In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou re- turn to the ground; for out if it wast thou taken: for dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return" (Genesis 3:19, .Psalm 119:73). C REV. ARCHIE D.WILSON Alta Loma Cartoonis'll: on 'Il:arget with media cri'll:icism Kudos to Gordon Campbell for his polit- ical cartoon on Feb, 17, There have been a few of his drawings that I thought \Vere worth", of a Pulitzer Prize. His ~crit.icisin of the liberal news media is right on buget. They.are hounding Dick. Cheney. The White House press corps have very bad manners. They have no re- spect for the office of tlw vice president.. They are like ~ btl,~ch of' spoiled brat.s. Their hat.r~d fi"fPresident BUf':h is etched in their faces. They scowl and sneer at him.:Tt. is quite obvious as to \"hose side t.ht~Y are on, 1FREDERICK D. MULLEN Upland Too little, 1too la1te A few weeks ago, more than a few Americans blanched at the sight of Pres i- dent. Bush hanging the Medal of Freedom around the neck of Muhammad All. Why didn't they give one to .Jane Fonda. too? They both refused to support America during the Vietnam \Var. Ali refused to enter military service, famously declaring, "I ain't got nothing against no Viet Cong." J still view AU with suspicion and con~ tempt becausp of his al1ti~war stance, I find many Vietnam War vets feel he failed his country miserably, leaving him a cow- ard and a trAitor. Yes. I know Ali just opened a llew cen~ tel' in Louisville to promote peace among all people. but. I think it's ton little t.oo late. The medal they hung around his neck should have said, "This is for all those that died while you 8'81. at home safe and free - you coward." VERNON MARTIN Ontado It's up to Rancho council to save neighborhood I: N Rancho CucanlOnga, , tucked away in the shadow of the 210 Freewav near Mil~ liken Avenue, is ~ nice little neighborhood, ,viih modest, well- kept homes inhabited by many grO\ving families. People greet each other as they walk to the local parks, and neighbors look out for each other. 'Ve have a great elementary school where parents stay in- volved and yolunteer in the class~ rooms. \Ve love our nice little neighborhood. And we need the Rancho Cucamonga City Coun- cil to help us save our neighbor- hood. Our proximity t.o the 210 Free- way looms large, \Ve have noise. Our neighborhood doesn't seem quite as safe as it did hefore the freeway opened. And our city is contemplating the reopening of a major thoroughfare and send- ing its traffic into the heart of OUT neighborhood, \Ve need our city's leaders to prevent that from hap- pening, More than 10 years ago. as plans were drawn up for the soon-to-be-built 210 Fre(>way, residents throughout t.he e~ty turned out in droves to revie\v the design, ask questions and provide input. Issues such as freeway noise, traffic patterns, increased crime and impact to our quality of life were thor- oughlyexamined. The city did a good job ad~ dressing many issues. and se- cured a pretty good deal from Caltrans and the San Berrwrdincr Associated Govern- ment.s (SANBAGI. One of the issues of great con- cern was the placement and de- sign oft.he freeway interchanges. Seemingly logical ofT-ramp loca- tions such as Euelid and Etl- wanda avenues were reiecterl for "historical" or other polit.ical rea- f':ons. while other more disruptive locations were contemplated, eyen though plaeing off-ramps at. these locat.ions could prove highly disruptivE'- to individual neighborhoods. Such was the case at Milliken Avenue. where the const.ruction of the interchange would neces- sitate the re-routing ofH.ighland Avenue, a major thoroughfare, into our residential neighborhood. Imagine that when the free- way is jammedl t.housands. of commut.ers, seeking:1 \"ay to by- pass the freeway, would :make thejr way through our neigh- borhood while our children are going to or from school. Imagine hunied mot.orists t.aking a short- cut and' spl~erling dov'l11 our streets. Exhaustive and open public hearings were held on this issue, The eitizens of the Victoria Groves area were able t.o obt.ain an agreement that Highland Ayc enue would be closed penna- ncntly. Subsequently. the cit.y of Rancho Cucamonga execut.ed a Memorandum ofUnderst.anding with Caltrans and SANBAG, which included the permanent. closure of Highland Avenue. \Vit.h this provision, the Milliken Avenue interchange was in- cluded in t.he final plan. . O\'e1'a11, this \vas an outcome t.hat \...ould preserve a semblance of s;::lfet~' lmd trmlquilit~, in the area. The voice of the common cit.izen was heard, and the process \vorked, Five yean:; latter. a small group of residents froIll outside our neighborhood somehow re- ope~led this debate. Again, much public input was provided to our Citv Couneil [lnd the freewav t.ask force. Despite overwheln~.- ing support. for keeping High- land Avehue closed, t.he original r1t~r:iBion \O\-'HB rpvr.r~p,i1. and t.llP council decided to recommend the reopening ofthe road t.o west- bound traffic, The issue was left open, how- ever, with a promise tore\'isit the situation prior to the actual re- opening of Highland Avenue. 'Ve have now surpassed a 10- year milestone, Highland Av- ellue has remained closed, with ugly temp()rar~r harriers scrawled with graffiti being in place since the construction of the freeway, The unpatrolled area wit.hin the Highland clo- sure attracts loitering youths. All ofthis serves as a const.ant reminder to our local resi- dents that. this issue is not re- solved. and that STEVE RENTERIA our neighbor~ G U EST hood re- C 0 L U M N 1ST majn~ at risk of1tlsing our safety and wpll~ being, The c.it.~r has prodded our com- munity another opportunit.y to address this issue. At a recent public hearing city st.aff pre- sented a traffic. study and took public comment, Amid t.his dis- cussion however. is an unfortu- nate bit of untruthful and revi- sionist. retelling of the "f~-l.(,t.s" of t.he decisions and agrcpment.s reached 10 years ago. The cit.y attorney, in t.he guif':f' of citv staff. declares that the I-lighiand closure was originally intended to be "t.empomry." A review of the record will lead eVen the most. casual observer to conclude t.hat. this assertion is either t.he result of poor recol- lection, poor analysis or a poor sense of the t.rut.h, In reviewing t.he recent tram" study, it becomes appan~nt that the folks who might routinely use a reopened Highland Avenue would be those who reside on t.he \vest side of the Deer Creek and must cross the ehannel to take their kids t.o Vic.toria Groves School. At. a recent public hearing there WAS not a single resident of t.his area who favored re- opening Highland A\.enu8. As a matter of fact, onl" one citv res- ident. who lives i;1 lwith~r illl~ paded neighborhood, spoke in favor of reopening Highland Av- enl1e. So, it all boils down to lhis: Is High land ^ venue "necr~f':sary" for local use? I would imagine thaI this would depend on one's def- inition of the word "necessary.'. Can we live without Highland Anmue reopening? We've been doing so for more than six .years, therefore~ common sense would indicat.e that. it,is not "necessary" foi' local use, There are no COl;1- pelling reasons t.o reopen High- land Ayenue. There is anot.her compelling reason to keep Highland Avenue closed, According to the Califor- nia Vehicle Code, once it. is re- opened. jt will stay open ~ re- gardless of any impact t.he road may cause, And it could never be fe-closed, fit least. until the pop- ulation of San Bernardino County grows from the current 2 million residents and exceeds 6 million. Our cltv leaders need 10 save our nice little neighborhood. and stand by the original agreement \vhich \\o'as intended to preserve our safety and \vhat little tran- quility we have left. They need t.o keep Highland A\'enue closE'd, ,;,'.. . - Steve Renteria is a resident nr Rancho CU('(J.J1Inn.f!a, ~r---"'~- ~- IL t voters ues right in that 6 in Pomona , to see through 'e an election )w whoever i seat until lage. nembers are so ~s they would leone opposite undo all the silence the peo- ;he majority , direction for t.he special lid go to the m who would ther council II want the l'e. pastor to deals to the ~r Pomona Uni- oyee. rubber~ z wantH. ~sentative who omona police miform, badge ey were on the , do see th!i9pgh DON FORD Pomona o council Domona Ie Pomona Citv ecision in call~ ) fill the vacant of calling for an that t.he council Jerson to take ,11 the November ifications of 31though I do 1 feel there are 'ledge and expe- he position. .6 will be aI. . ght to vote - in we talked to 19rees that the ?ly. The council 11 this immedi- BETH BROOKS Pomona I election pay ly Bulletin edi-. ~ly urge t.he resi- and an election istrict 6 council eople have sacri~ lit of democracy fcess. But here, mcil doesn't. 'lng peoplp to ::ontat.ion is all , in their infinite t.han happy to IS (perhAps al1- ployee ,,,,ould suf- 's assertion that. II on I." servo ~' rea~oning, a::; hhnnced ability Is dramat.icall,\' r1 incumbent's : is a Rmnll one t.o iemocrHt.ic idt\', So I sav I'orres and Coun. for continuing ion. The cit.izens most. basic of LMAN.HENSEN PomonR ,._.".."""-"'-"C",,,~,.,.--._~- 1I~~lllll\llJ Dll&NPOOIPtllI! "- Sanctuary lunacy won't help city of ~omona I could not believe my eyes when I read the article regarding Councilman Robles asking Pomona to stand against HR 4437. Not only is he asking city residents to break the law by not upholding the current immigration laws, but he's asking them to break another law by aiding and abetting illegal immi- grants by employing them, against federal law. This man needs to have his head examined. Asking the citizens of Pomona to-break current federal laws is like Pomona shooting itself in the foot. After all, the cities are extensions of the states, states extensions of our country, etc, And when Robles is sug. gesting that it would further burden the city's Police Department, I don't see where that is the case, I'm sure the federal government isn't asking local police staff to cruise around the city as though they are INS inspectors. I would assume that they v./ould address the legal status of an indi. vidual if for any reason they are questioned by the police. Why is Robles concerned about people or organizations that aid un~ documented immigrants being prose- cuted as smugglers? These people or organizations wouldn't be prosecuted as smugglers unless someone is aid~ ing and abetting those individuals here illegally, or in other words, those committing a crime. You can't sayan one hand, don't break our city or state laws, and on the other hand, send the message that it's OK to break our federal laws. And if Robles doesn't realize that, he has no business being on the City Council to begin with. The statement that if the council approved Pomona as a sanctuary city would be sending the wrong message is an understatement. That's all Pomona needs. They might as well put up bill- boards saying, "Come to Pomona: Even if you break the law, you'll be accepted .and tolerat.ed," How is t.his type of lunacy going to turn the city of Pomona around from its current problems? I think it would only add to them. YOLANDA GUTIERREZ Upland Pull off freeways during . rOlUltine traffic stops Reading about the loss of another police officer to a traffic collision by a drunken driver just breaks my heart: So many innocent lives have been lost on our freeways because they have pulled over and become victims of tragedy. Can we not have CHP officers pull pea. pIe off the freeway to the next off-ramp? Pulling over for any reason on our. heavily t.raveled freeways puts motorists in dan- ger. " \Vhenever there is a traffic stop on the freeway, traffic backs up for miles be~ CAuse of the interest. factor. Personally, I have driven on and ruined a tire just t.o make it off the freeway. Surface streets may also have hazards, but I'll take a vehicle passing by at 35 mph versus 75 mph any day. Godspeed to Officer Bailey. DAN CENTURIONI Alta Loma Evolution is nothing but a bOlLmciB1lg ball Is it gratitying to know that tiny cosmic' dust balls caught and recently conveyed to Earth may be the answer t.o life, ac- cording to those involved in old bones and super flights - evolutionislq. And so it would naturally follow t.hat out of t.hose microscopic dust balls the tree ofHfe would evolve, and event.ually the ape man. . Enough of Darwin {son of a man of the cloth, minister of the gospel} and to the truth: King David said of God's creation that man was "... fearfnIJy 81li:lwonder- Cfully made" (Psalm 139:14).. . .c.. '.. Isn't it oVl~rpowedng to know that there are many people of supeI;or knowl~ edge \vho will never, ever believe the big lie of organic evolution? For the chosen of the Lord, it is said, "Ye shall know all t.hings" (1 John 2:20). \Ve can finally summadze evolution as nothihg more than an erratic, uncon- trolled bouncing ball. Who knows where it will go next. and stop, but stop it will. Nothing in this world happens by chance, Not only does the world as a whole test.ity t.o the beauty, glory and power of creation, but" the very dust itself: The elements comprising the human body. are exactly the same as those in the ground. . To summ::l.rize the solid truth we have what God Raid to Adam: "In the sweat of thy fat~e shalt thou eat bread, till thou re~ turn to the ground; for out if it wast thou taken: for dust thou art, and unto dust. shalt thou return" (Genesis 3:19, .Psalm 119:73). REV. ARCHIE D. WILSON Alta Lorna Cartoonist on target with media criticism Kudos to Gordon Campbell for his po1it.- ical cartoon on Feb. 17" There have been a few of his drawings that I thought were worthy of a Pulitzer Prize. His "critic-ism of the liberal ne,vs media is right on target, They.are hounding Dick Cheney, The 'White House press corps have vel'v bad manners, Thev have no re- spect for"the office of the vice president.. They are like a bu,!!c!) of sl'oilt!d bl'8ls. Their hatrt'u 6fPresident BUf'h is etched in their faces. They scowl and sneer at him, <It is q.uite obvious as to whose side t.h~y are on. (FREDERICK D. MULLEN . Upland Too little, too late A few '.veeks ago, more than a fe,,, Americans blanched at the sight ofPresi~ dent. Bush hAnging the Medal of Freedom around the neck of Muhammad AIi. Why didn't they give one to .Iane Fonda. too? They both refused to support America during the Vietnam \Var. Ali refused to enter milit.ary service, famously declaring, "I ain't got nothing against no Viet Cong," I stilI view Ali '''lith suspicion and con~ tempt beCAUSf' of his ant;-,var stance. I and many Vietnam V',/ ar \Tets feel he failed his country miserably, leaving him a cow~ ard find a traitor. Yes, I know All just opened a new cen- ter in Louisville t.o promote peace among all people, but. I think it's t.oo little too late. The medal they hung around his neck should have said, ''This is for all those that died while you sat at home safe and free - you coward." VERNON MARTIN Ontario It's up to Rancho council. to save. neighborhood IN Rancho Cucamollga, council decided t.o recommend tucked away in the shAdO\\" of the reopening of the road to west. the 210 Free'~'av near IVlil. bound traffic. liken Avenue, is ~ nice little The issue was left open, how~ neighborhood, \>;,ith modest, we11- ever, ,vith a promise to revisit the kept homes inhabited by many situation prior t.o the actual re- growing families, opening of Highland Avenue-. People greet each other as \Ve have now surpassed a 10- they walk to the local parks, and year milest.one, Highland Av- neighbors look out for each other. enue has remained closed, with \Ve have a great elementary ugly temporary barriers school where parents stay in- scrawled with graffiti being in valved and volunteer in the class- place since the const.ruction of rooms. \\'e love our nice little t.he freeway. The unpatrolled neighborhood, And we need the area wit.hin the HighlAnd c1o- H.ancho Cucamonga City Coun- sure attracts loitering youths. cil to help us save our neighbor- All of this serves as a constant hood, reminder Our proximity t.o the 210 Free- to our way looms large. 'Ve have noise, local resi~ Our IleighborI--lOod doesn't seem d e 11 t s quite as safe as it did before the that this freeway opened. And our city is is-sue is contemplating the reopening of not re- a major thoroughfare and send- sol v ed, ingitstrafficintotheheartofour and that STEVE RENTERIA neighborhood. We need our city's 0 u r leaders to prevent that. from hap- neighbor- G U EST pening. hood re- C 0 L U M N 1ST More than 10 ye(1r~ a~o, as main~ at plans were drawn up for the risk ofloslng our s:lfet.y and welJ- Eoon-to-be-buiIt 210 Freeway. bf'ing, residents t.hroughout. t.he city The city has prm"ided nul' CUt1l- t.urned out in droves to review munity anot.ber opportunity to the design, ask quest.ions and address this issue. At a recent provide input. Issues such as puhlic hearing city st.aff pre- freeway noise, traffic patterns, sf>nted a traffic st.udv and took increased crime and impact t.o public comment. Amid this dis- our quality of life were thor~ cussion however. is an unfortu- oughlyexamined. nate bit of untruthful and revi- The city did a good job ad- sinnist. retelling of the "t~'lcts" of dressing many issues, and se~ t.he decisions and agreement.s cured a pretty good deal from reached 10 years ngo. Ca1t.rans and the San The cit.y attorney, ill t.he guise Bernardinrr Associated GOV€l'!l- _llf city staff, declares t.hat the- rnents ,SANBAG). Highland closure was originally One of the issues of great con- intended to be "t.emporary!' A cern was the placement and de- review of the record will lead sign of the freeway interchanges, eVen the most casual observer Seemingly logical off-ramp loca- to conclude that this assert.ion if: tions such as Euclid and Eti- either the result of poor recal- wanda avenues were rejected for lection, poor anal~'.:::is or a poor "historical" or ot.her political nm- sense of the truth, sons, while other more disruptive In reviewing tIle recent. traflic locations were contemplat.ed, st.udy, it. becomes apparent that even though plaeing off-ramps the folks who might. routinely at these locations could prove use a reopened Highland Avenue highly disruptive to individual would be those who reside on the neighborhoods, west side oCthe Deer Creek and Such was the case at Milliken must. cross t.he channel to take Avenue, where the construction t.heir kids to Victoria Groves of the interchange would neces- School. sit.ate the re-l'out~ng of Highland At. a recent public hearing Avenue, a major t.horoughfare, there was not a single resident into our residential neighborhood, of this area ,,"'ho favored re- Imagine that when the [rE'e- opening Highland Avenue. As a way is jammed, thousands of matter of fAct, only one cit.y n~s- commuters, seeking a way to by- ident, who llves. in neither im- pass the freevmy, would snake paded neighborhood, spoke in t.heir way through our neigh- favor of reopening I--lighland Av- borhood \vhile OUT ehildren are enue, guing to or from school. Imagine So, it all boils down to t:his: Is hurried motorists taking a short~ Highland Avenue "nece:::;sary" for cut. and speeding down our local use? I would illlagim~ that st.reets. this \vou]d deptmd on one's def- gxhaustive and open public iliition oftbe ,",'ord "necessary." hearings were held on t.his issue. Can we live without: HighlAnd The citizens of the Victoria Avenue reopening? We've been Groves area ':rere able to obtain doing so for more than six yeArR, an agreement. that Highland Av- therefore, common sense would enue would be closed pernla~ indicate tllat it is not "necessHry" nently. Subsequent.ly, the city of for locnl use. Thorp are no C0111- Rancho Cucamonga executed a pelting reasons t.o l'Popen lligh- Memorandllll1 of Understanding land Avenlw. with Caltrans and SANBAG, Then' is another compelling which included t.he permanent. reas'on to keep Highland Avenue closure of Highland Avenue. closed, According to the Cnlifor- With this provision, the Milliken nin Vehicle Code, onee it. is re~ Avenue interchange waF; in- opened, it will stay open ~ re- eluded in t.he final plan. gardless of any impact. the road Overall. this 'VAS an outcome may cause, And it could never be that ,vQuld preserve a semblance re"~losed, at least until the pop- of safety and tranquility in the uJation of San Bernardinu area. The voice of the common County grows from the current cit.izen was heard, and the 2 million residents and exceeds process worked, 6 million, Five yearR latter. R. ~mall group Our city leaders need to save of residents from outside our our nit'e little neighborhood. and neighborhood somehow l'e~ stand by the original agreement opened this debate. Again, much which ,vas intended to preserve public input was proyided to our our safety l-md what. little tmn- City Council and the freeway quility we have left. They need task force, Despite ovprwhelm- to keep Highland Avenue closed, ing support. for keeping High- land Ayenue closed, t.he original ijpc'lRlnn \VFlR l'pv~n~p.(L find tJw - Steve Renteria is (l re..;ident of Rancho Curammula, -"---r--=~- -- _IL ct voters sues s right in that ict 6 in Pomona ce to see through I be an election :now whoever ~ 6 seat .until image. I members are so 'fes they would )meone opposite to undo all the ;0 silence the peo- e the majority ::!s' direction for in the special ould go to the i80n who would other council not want the lez's pastor to d deals to the her Pomona Uni~ ployee'rubber- ilez wants. lresentatlve who Pomona police I uniform, badge they were on the t 6 do see t~pg~ DON FORD Pomona to council Pomona t.he Pomona City ,decision in call- to fill the vacant d of calling for an e that t.he council :l person t.o take ntil the November alifications of ;, although I do nd feel there are )w ledge and expe- J the position. ct 6 will be al- right to vot.e - in have talked to t agrees that the It.elv. The council . on 'this immedi- BETH BROOKS Pomona 111 election , pay ,ilv Bulletin edi- ngiy urge the resi- nand an election. )jstrid 6 council people have Raeri. ;uit of democracy 'ocess. But here. luncil doesn't wing people to sentation is all s. in their infinite , than happy to Uf=; (perhflps an- lployee would Bof- n's f1ssertion thBt ;ill only serve ty reaR-ooing, as mhanced ability Ids dramflt-icalh an incumbent's o is a smnll one to democrat.ic r citv. So I SAV TOI';'eR- and Coun~ ') for continuing hon. The cit.izens . most. basic of lLMAN-HENSEN Pomon.A , ~-"I . .~. 1I~Y~ll1llll DlJiN POO\PWI! "-. - Sanctuary lunacy won't help city of ~omona I eQuId not believe my eyes when I read the article. regarding Councilman Robles asking Pomona to stand ~ against HR 4437, Not only is he asking city residents to break the Jaw by not upholding the current immigration laws, but he's asking them to break another law by aiding and abetting illegal immi- grants by employing them, against federal law. This man needs to have his head .t;!xamined. Asking the citizens of Pomona to .break current federallaw,g . is like Pomona shooting itself in the foot. After all, the cities are extensions of the states, states extensions of our country, etc. And when Robles is sug- gesting that it would further burden the city's Police Department, I don't see where that is the case. I'm sure the federal government isn't asking local police staff to cruise around the city as though they are INS inspectors, I would assume that they would address the legal status of an indi- vidual if for any reason they are questioned by the police. Why is Robles concerned about people or organizations that aid UI1* documented immigrants being prose* cuted as smugglers? These people or organizations wouldn't be prosecuted as smugglers unless someone is aid- ing and abetting those individnals here illegally, or in other words, those committing a crime. You can't say on one hand, don't break our city or state laws; and on the other hand, send the message that it's OK to break our federal laws. And if Robles doesn't realize that., he has no business being on the City Cotmcil to begin with. The statement that if the council approved Pomona as a sanctuary city would be sending the wrong message is an understatement. That's all Pomona needs. They might as well put up bill- boards saying; "Come to Pomona: Even if you break the law, you'll be accepted and tolerated." How is this type of lunacy going to tnrn the city of Pomona aronnd from its current problems? I think it would only add to them. YOLANDA GUTIERREZ Upland Pull off freeways during routine traffic stops Reading about t.he loss of another police officer to a traffic collision by a drunken driver just breaks my heart. So many innocent lives have been lost on our freeways because they have pulled . over and become victims of tragedy. Can we not have CHP nfficers pull peo- ple off the fi'eeway to the next off-ramp? Pulling over for any reason on our heavily traveled freeways puts motorists in dan- ger. \Vhenever there is a traffic stop on the freeway, traffic backs up for miles be* cause of the interest factor. Personally l I have driven on and ruined a tire just to make it off the freeway. Surface streets mayalso have hazards, hut I'll take a vehicle passing by at 35 mph versus 75 mph any day. Godspeed to Officer Bailey. DAN CENTURIONI Alta Lorna Evolution is n01l:hing but a bouncing ball Is it gratifying to know that tiny cosmic dust balls caught and recently conveyed to Earth may be the answer to life, ac- cording to tl~ose involved in old bones and super flights - evolutionists. And so it would naturally follow that out of those microscopic dust balls the tree of life would evolve, and eventually the ape man. Enough of Darwin tson of a man ofthe cloth, minister of the gospell and to the truth: King David said of God's creation tha~ man was"... fearfuIJY.,ll!1.4.y.;01.).der- . ftilly'made" (Psalm 139:14)'. - ~.; q . . Isn't it overp()\vering to know that there are many people of superior knm....l- edge who "vill never. ever believe the big lie of organic evolution? For the chosen of the Lord, it is said, "Ye shall know all t.hings" (! John 2:20). We can finally summarize' evolution as nothing more than an erratic. uncon- trolled bonncing ball. Who knows where it will go next and stop, but stop it will. Nothing in this world happens by chance. Not only does the world as a whole testify to' the hemlty, glory and power of creation, hut the very dust itself: The elements comprising the human body are exactly the same as those in the ground. To summarize the solid truth we have what God said to Adam: "In the sweat of thy faee shalt thou eat bread, till thou re- turn to the ground; for out if it wast thou taken: for dust t.hou art, and unt.n dust. shalt thou rdum" (Genesis 3:19, Psalm 119:73). REV. ARCHIE D. WILSON Alta Loma Cartoonist on 1I:arget with media criticism Kudos to Gordon Campbell filr his polit* ical cartoon on Feb. 17. There have been a few ofhi5 drawings that I thought \\'e1'e worthy of a Pulitzer Prize. Hhfcriticism of the liberal news media is right on target. They.are hounding Diek Cheney. 111P- White House press corps have verY bnd manners. Thev have no re- spect for'.the offic~ of the vice" president. They are like ~ bH~~h of spollRd brats. Their hatrqd of President Bush is etched in their faces. They sco\tl and sneer at him. ':It is quite obvjous as to whose side th~y are all. ;; ;FREDERICK D. MULLEN , , Upland Too iiUla, 11:00 ia1l:e A few weeks ago, more than a few Americans blanched at the sight. of Pres i- dent. Bush hanging the Medal of Freedom around the neck of Muhammad All. Why dido't they give one to Jane Fonda, too? They both refused to support America during the Vietnam War. Ali refused to enter military service, famously declaring. "1 ain't. g()t. nothing against. no Viet Cong." I st.ill view AU with suspicion and con~ tempt because of his anti~war stnnc{!. I and man v Vietnam \Var vets feel he failed his country miserably, leaving him a cow- ard and a traitor. Yes. I know Ali just opened a new cen- ter in Louisville to promot.e peace among all people, but I think it's too little too late. The. medal they hung around his neck should have said, "This is for all those that died while you sat at homp safe and free - you coward." VERNON MARTIN Ontario It's up to Rancho council to save neighborhood IN Rancho Cucamonga, . tncked away in the shadow of the 210 Freewav near Mil. liken Avenue. is ~ nice little neighborhood, \vith modest, well- kept homes inhabited by many growing families. People greet each other as they walk to the local parks, and neighbors look out for each other. Vole have a great elementary school where parents stay in- volved and volunteer in the class. rooms. \Ve love our nice little neighborhood. And we need the Rancho Cucamonga City Coun- cil to help us save our neighbor- hood. Our proximity to the 210 Free- way looms large. \Ve have noise. Our neighborhood doesn't seem quit.e as safe as it. did before the freeway opened. And our city is contemplating the reopening of a major thoroughfare and send. ing its traffic into the heart. of our neighborhood. We need our city's leaders to prevent that from hap- pening. More than 10 Yl?ar~ ago. as plans Vi'ere drawn up for the soon-to-be-built 210 Free\vav. residents throughout the c~ty turned out. in droves to review the design, ask questions and provide input. Issues such as freeway noise, traffic patt.erns, increased crime and impact. to our quality of life were thor- oughlyexamined. The cit.y did a good job ad~ dressing many issues. and se- cured a pretty good deal from Caltrans and the San Bernardin<f Associated Gov:ern- ments (SANBAG). One of the issues of great con- cern was the placement and de- sign of the freeway interchanges. Seemingly logical ofT-ramp loca- tions such as Euclid and Eti~ wanda avenues \vere rejected for "historic~r or ot.her political rea- sons, while other more disruptive locations were contemplated. even though placing off-ramps at these locations could prove highly disruptive to individual neighborhoods. Such was the case at. Milliken Avenue. \\There the const.ruction of tIle interchange would neces- sit.ate the re-routing of Highland Avenue, a major thoroughfare, int.o our residential neighborhood. lmagine that \vhen the fn~e- way is jammed, thousands of commuters, seeking a v.my to hy- pass the freeway. would snake their way through our neigh- bodlOod \vhUe our children are going to or from Rchool. Imagine hurried motorists taking a short- cut and speeding do\\'n our ~treets. Exhaustive and open public hearings were held on this issue. The citizens of the Victoria Groves area were able t.o obtain an agreement that Highland Av- enue would be closed perma- nently. SubsequellUy. the cit.y of Rancho Cucamonga executed a l'vlemorandum of Understanding with Caltrans and SANBAG. which included the permanent closure of Highland Avenue. With this provision, the Milliken Avenue inte,rchange was in~ c1uded in t.he final plan. Overall. t.his was an outcorne that would presen'e a semblance of safety and t.ranquilit~, in t.he area. The voice of the common citizen \vas heard, and the process worked. Five years latter, a small group of residents from outside our neighborhood somehow re- opened this debate. Again. much public input 'ivas provided to our Citv Council and the free\'.'av t.ask force. Despit.e dveJ"\yheln~~. ing support. for keeping High- land Avenue closed. the original rleclF\inn was reverF\ed. Rnd thfl council decided to recommend the reopening ofthe road to west- bound traffic. The issue was left open, how- ever, with a promise to revisit t.he situation prior to the actual re- opening of Highland Avenue. .We have now surpassed a 10- year milestone. Highland Av- enue has remained closed. with ugly temporary barriers scrawled \>,,'ith graffiti being in place since the construction of the freeway. TIH? unpatrnlled area within the Highland clo- sure attracts loitering yout.hs. All ofthi8 serves as a constant reminder to our local resi~ den t s that t.his issue is not re~ solved, and that STEVE RENTERIA our neighbor- (, U EST hood re- C 0 L U M N 1ST mains af risk oflosing our safety and well- being. The cit.y has provided our com~ munit~' another opportunity to address this issue. At a recent public hearing city st.aff pre- sented a traffic studv and took public comment. Amid t.his dis- cussion however. is an unfortu- nate bit of untruthful and revi- sionist retelling of the "fRets" of the decisions and agreements reaehed 10 years ago. The city attorney. in t.he guise of cjty staff, declares that the Highland closure \vas originally. intended t.o he "t.emporary." A review of the record will lead eVen the most c3F\ual observer to conclude that this assertion 1S either the result of poor I'e('ol- leet-ion, poor analysis or a poor sense of the t.ruth. In reviewing t.he recent troflir study. it. becomes apparent that the folks who might routinely use a reopened Highland Avenue \vould be those who reside on the \\'est side of the Dee.r Creek and mUf:t cross tbe channel to take their kids to Victoritl Groves SchooL At. a recent public hearing there was not a single resident of this area who favored re~ opening Highland Avenue. As a matter of fact, only one city res- ident. who lives in neither im- paded neighborhood, spoke in favor of reopening Highland Av- enue. So, it all boils down to this: Is Highl81ld Avenue "necessary" for local use? I would imagine thal this would depend on one's def- inition of the \\'ord "npcessar.y." Can we live wit.hout. Highland Avenue reopening? .\Ve've been doing so for more than six years, t.herefore. common senRC would illdicate that it is not "necessary" for lncal use. There are n(1 com- pelling reasons to reopen High- land Avenue. There is another compelling reason to keep Highland Avenue closed. According to the Califor- nia Vehicle Code, once it is rew opened. it will stay open - re- gardless of any impact. the foad mny CRuse. And it could ne\'er be J'e-{~]osed, at least until the pop- ulation of San Bernardino County grows from the current 2 million residents and exceeds 6 million. Our city leaders need to savE' our nice little neighborhood, and stand by the original agreement which was int.ended to preserve our safety and what. little tnm- quility w~ have left. They Heed t.o keep Highland Avenue closed. - Steve Renteria is a /'e$ident of Rancho C1icmnmum. .-~r--",,~- _h _IL ct voters :sues IS righ t in tha t let 6 in Pomona Ice to see through. 1 be an election mow whoever t 6 seat .until Image. il members are so . rres they would omeone opposite to undo all the e. to silence the peo~ e the majority . es' direction for in the special ould go to the rson who would ~ other council not want the .Iez's pastor to ,d deals to the ;her Pomona Uni- lployee. rubber~ ue? wants, presentative who , Pomona police I uniform, badge they were on the .t 6 do see th~P'gh . DON FORD Pomona to council Pomona the Pomona Citv . decision in call~ . to fill the vacant d of calling for an .e that t.he council d person to t.ake nt.11 the November aliflcatlons of ., although I do nd feel there are )wledge and expch ) the position. ct 6 will be al- right. to votl? - in have talked to t agrees that the It.ely. 111e council on 'this immedi- BETH BROOKS Pomona "' election , pay ,ilv Bullet.in edi- ngiy urge the resi- nand an election , Jistrkt 6 council people have sacri- mit of democracy 'ocess. But here. I mncil doesn't \\"'i ng people to sentation is all s, in their infinit.e , than happy to lIR (perhnps an- i lployee would suf- n's Assertion that liil only serve ly reasoning, as ~nhanced ability Ids dramRtically an incumbent's o is a smnll one io democratic r ch\'. So] say Tor~es and Coun- 1 for continuing tion. The citize.ns . most. basic of . I I'lLMAN-HENSEN PomonR .--'---'---,:-'",<>y>---:-> 'j: '. t' . '._"'-';""';':''f.'","U._~ II~YKllllllll IIIIIN I'\l(j\PWI! ..... Sanctuary lunacy won't help city of ~omona I could not believe my eyes when I read the article regarding Councilman Robles asking Pomona to stand against HR 4437. Not only is he asking city residents to break the law hy not upholding the current immigration laws, but he's asking them to break another law by aiding and abetting illegal immi- grants by employing them, against federal law. This man needs to have his head ~xamined. Asking the citizens of '. Pomona to ;break current federal laws is like Pomona shooting itself in the foot. After all, the cities are extensions of the states, states extensions of our country, et.c. And when Robles is sug- gesting that it would further burden the city's Police Department, I don't see where that is the case. I'm sure the federal government isn't asking local police staff to cruise around the city as though they are INS inspectors. I would assume that they would address the legal status of an indi~ . vidual if for any reason they are questioned by the police. Whv is Robles concerned about people- or organizations that aid un~ documented immigrants being prose~ cuted as smugglers? These people or organizations wouldn't be prosecuted as smtigglers unless someone is aid- ing and abetting those individuals here illegally, or in other words. those committing a crime. You can't sayan one hand, don't break our city or state laws, and on the othe.r hand, send the message that it's OK to break our federal laws. And if Robles doesn't realize that, he has no business being on the City Council to begin with. The statement that if the council approved Pomona as a sanctuary city would be sending the wrong message is an understat"ement. That's all Pomona needs. . They might as well put up bill- boards saying, "Come to Pomona: Even if you break the law, you'll be accepted and tolerated." How is this type of lunacy going to turn the city of Pomona around from its current problems? I think it would only add to them. YOLANDA GUTIERREZ Upland Pull off freeways during routine traffic stops Reading about the loss of another police officer to a traffic collision by a drunken driver just breaks my heart. So many innocent lives have been lost on our freeways because they have pulled over and become victims of tragedy. Can we not have CHP officers pull peo- ple off the freeway to the next off-ramp? Pulling over for any reason on our heavily traveled freeways puts motorists in dan- ger. \Vhenever there is a traffic stop on the freeway, traffic backs up for miles be- cause of the interest factor. Personally, I have driven on and ruined a tire just to . make it off the freeway. Surface streets may also have hazards, but rn take a vehicle passing by at 35 mph versus 75 mph any day. Godspeed to Officer Bailey. DAN CENTURIONI Alta Loma Evolution is nothing but a bouncing ball Is it gratifying to know that tiny cosmic dust balls caught and recently conveyed to Earth may be the answer t.o life, ac- cording to those involved in old bones and super flights - evolutionists. And so it would naturally foHm...' thAt out of those microHcopic dt;st balls the tree of life would evolve, and eventually the ape man. Enough ofDanvin tson of a man of the cloth, minister of the gospel) and to the truth: King David said of God's creation that man wasl'... fearft111y,~~4/~ot;lder- fully made" (Psalm 139,14). c... . Isn't it. overpO\vering to know that there are many people of superior knowl- edge'who will never, ever believe the big lie of organic evolution? For the chosen of the Lord, it is said) "Ye shall know all things" (1 John 2:20). We can finally summarize evolution as nothing more than an erratic, uncon- trolled bouncing ball. Who knows where it will go next. and stop, but stop it will. Nothing in this world happens by chance. Not only does the world as a whole testilY to the beauty, glnry and power of creatioTI, but the very dust itself: The element$ comprising t.he human body are exactly the same as those -in the ground. To summarize the solid truth we have what God said to Adam: "In the sweat of thy fa"e shalt thou eat bread, till thnu re- turn to the ground; for out if it wast thou taken: for dust thou art. and unto dust shalt thou rdurn" (Genesis 3:19, _Psalm 119:73). REV. ARCHIE D. WILSON AHa Loma Cartoonist on target with medlia criticism Kudos to Gordon Campbell for his polit- ical cartHon on Feb. 17. 111ere have been a few ofhi8 drawings that I thought \...'ere worthy of a Pulitzer Prize. His'criticism of the liberal news media is right on target. They.are hounding Dlck Cheney. The White House press corps have verY bad manners. Thev have no re- spect for'.the office of the vice president. They are liketi bU,llCh,of" SpOill~d brats. Their hat.red MPresident. BU5h is etched in their faces. They scowl and sneer at him. ;Yt is q;uite obvious as to whose side t:h~y are on. lFREDERICli D. MULLEN . Upland Too little, 11:00 Rate A few weeks ago, more than a few Americans blanched at. the sight ofPresi- dent Bush hanging the Medal of Freedom around the neck of Muhammad Ali. Why didn-t they give one to Jane Fonda, too? They both refused to support America during the Vietnam War. AI; refused to enter milit~ry service, famously declaring, "1 ain't got Bothing against no Viet Cong.>! 1 still view.Ali with suspicion and con. tempt becausE' of his ant.i-war stance. I and manv Vietnam War vets feel he failed his count~y miserably, leaving him a cow- ard and fI traitor. Yes, I lmm'l-' Alijust opened a new cen- ter in Louif;ville to promote peace among all people, but. I think it's too little tno late. The medal they hung around his neck should have said, "This is for all those that died while you sat at home safe and free - you coward." VERNON MARTIN OntaI'io It's up to Rancho council to save neighborhood IN Rancho Cucamonga, ; tucked away in th.e shadm\' of the 210 Freeway near Mil- liken Avenue, is a nice little neighborhood, ;,....ith modest. we11- kept homes inhabited by many growing familie5. People greet each other as they walk to the local parks. and neighbors look out for each other. We have a great elementary school where parents stay in- volved and volunteer in the class- rooms. \Ve love our nice little neighborhood. And we need the Rancho Cucamonga City Coun- cil to help us save our neighbor- hood. Onr proximit.y to the 210 Free- way looms large. '''Ie have noise. Our neighborhood doesn't seem quite as safe as it did before the freeway opened. And our city is contemplating the reopening of a major thoroughfare and send- ing its traffic into the heart of our neighborhood. \Ve need our city's leaders to prevent. t.hat from hap- pening. Marc than 10 yeaTS ago. as plans were drawn up for lhe soon-to-be-buiH 210 Freeway, residents throughout the city turned out in droves to revi~\~' the design. ask questions and provide input. Issues such as freeway noise, traffic patterns, increased crime and lmpact to our quality of life were t.hor- oughlyexamined. The city did a good job ad- dressing many issues, [md se- cured a pretty good deal from Caltrans and the San BernardinCf Associat.ed Govern- ments (SANBAG). One of the issues of great con- cern was the placement and de- sign ofthe freeway interchanges. Seemingly logical ofT-ramp loca- tions such as Euclid and Eti- wanda avenues were rejected for "historical" or other political rea- sons. whiie other more disnipti,"e locations were contemplated. -even though placing off-ramps at these locations could prove highly disruptive to individual neighborhoods. Such was the case at Milliken Avenue, where the construction of the interchange would neces- sit.ate the re-routing ofIlighland Avenue, a major thoroughfare, into our residential neighborhood. Imagine that when t.he free- way is jammed, thousands of commuters, seeking a ,vay to by- pass the freeway, would snake their way through our neigh- borhood while our ehildren are going t.o or from sehool. lmagine hurried motorists t.aking a short- cut and speeding- dov,'n our street.s. Exhaustive and open public hearings were held on thls issue. The citizens of the Victoria Groves area were able to obt.ain an agreement that. Highland Av- enue would be closed penllB.- nently. Subsequently, the cit.y of Rancho Cucamonga executed a Memorandum ofU nderstanding with Caltrans and SANBAG. \vhich included the permanent closure of Highland Avenue. \\lith this provision. the Milliken Avenue interchange was in- cluded in t.he final plan. Overall, this \vas an outcome that \..:ould preserve a semblAnce of safety and tranquility in t.he area. The voice of the common citizen \vas heard, Rnd the process worked. Five years latter. a small group of residents from outside our neighborbood somehow 1'e- opei1ed this debate. Again. much public input was provided t.o our Cits Council and the freewav t.ask force. Despite overwheln~.- ing support. for keeping High. 'lFmd Avenue closed. the original rlpr:ij:\lon WHR l'0.vm'sp.rl. l'md thp council decided to recommend the reopening ofthe road to west- bound traffic. The issue was left. open. how- ever, with a promise to revisit the situation prior to the actual re- opening of HIghland Avenue. Vile have now surpassed a 10- year milestone. Highland Av. enue has remained closed, wit.h ugly temporary barriers scrawled ,,,-'ith graffiti being in place since the construction of the freeway. The unpat.rolled area within the Highland c.lo- sure attracts loitering youths. All ofthis serves as a constant reminder to Ollr local resi~ dents t.hat t.his issue is not re- solved, and that STEVE RENTERIA our neighbor:- G U EST hood re- C 0 L U M N 1ST main~ aj risk oflosing our safety and well- being. The city has provided our com- munity another opportunity to address t.his issue. At. a recent public hearing city staff pre- sented a traffic- stud\' cmd took public comment. Amid this dis~ eussion however. is an unfortu- nate_ bit of untruthful and revi- sionist. retplling of the "fad.s.' of the decisions and agreements reached 10 years ago. The city attorney, in t.he guise of city staff, declares that the Highland closure was originally intended to be "temporary." A revievv. of the record \viII lead eVen the most casual obselTer to conclude t.hat this assert.ion is either the result of poor recol- lection. poor analysis or a poor sense of the t.ruth. In reviewing t.he rec.ent traili.c study. it becomes apparent that the folks \\'ho might. rout.inely use a reopened Highland Avenue would be those who reside on the west side of the Deer Creek and lllust cross the channel to take t.heir kids to Victoria Groves School. At a recent. public hearing t.here was not. a single resident of t.his area \\'ho favored re- opening Highland A\"enu8. As a matter of fact, only one city res- ident, who Jives in Iwither im- pacted neighborhood, spoke in favor of reopening Highland Av- enue. So, it all boils do\\"n to this: Is Highland A venue "necef'sary" for local use? I would imagine that this would depend on one's def- init.ion of the \Vol'd "necessary." Can we live without Highland Avenue reopening? We've been doing so for more than six years) therefon~. common sense would indicate t.bat. it is not "necessary" for local use. There are 11{l com- pelling reasons t.u n~op('n High- land Avenue. There is another compelling reason t.o keep Higllland Avenue closed. According to the Califor- nia Vehiele Code. once it is re- opened, it will stay open - re- gardless of any impact the road Tl)av cause. And it could I1m'er be re-l~losed. at least until the pop- ulat.ion of San Bernardillo County grows from the current 2 million residents and exceeds 6milHon. Our city leaders need to save our nicE' little neighborhood. and stand by the original agreement which was intended to preserve our safety and what. little trRn~ quility we have left. They need to keep Highland AV'?llue dosed. - SteFe Renteria lB a re~ident of Ronrhn Curomom!a. ---r-~",,~- d XL t voters iues right in that : 6 in Pomona , to see through )0 an election ow whoever ) seat until lage. members are so '8 they would leone opposite undo all the silence the peo- ,he majority direction for t.he special Id go to t.he In who would ~her council t want the .'8 pastor to ieals t.o t.he r Pomona Uni- >yee'rubber- : wants. sentahve who ImonB police liform, hadge ~y were on the do see t.hunf'gh "';1 DON FORD Pomona I council [)mona Pomona City :ision in call: ~ fill the vacant f calling for an lat, the council ~rson t.o take the November ications of t.hough I do feel there are ~dge ::md expe- B position. ,will be al- lt to vote - in e talked to rees that the r. The council this immedi- ETH BROOKS Pomona election ay Bulletin edi- . urge the resi- d an election rid 6 council pIe have sacri~ of democracy 58. But here, ;il doesn't g people to cation is all their infinit.e 1D happy t.o perhAps an- yee would suf- ;ssertion UUl.t mly serve ~asoning, as IIlced ability Iramaticall" ncumbent's' a smnll one to locJ'at.ic y. So 1 say res and Coun. continuing The cit.izens ;t basic of AN-HENSEN PomonA _'_'~~"'~"'~',;"",.",!"~~ ~.'~"':*'-~,,," ~ mnlllllllJ OIISNpamPllN! "-. Sanctuary lunacy won't help city of I=>>omona . I could not believe my eyes when I read the article regarding Councilman Robles asking Pomona to stand against. HR 4437. Not only is he asking city residents to break t.he law by not. upholding t.he current immigration laws, but he's asking t.hem t.o break another law by aiding and abetting illegal immi- grants by employing t.hem, against federal law. This man needs to have his head ~xamined. Asking the citizens of Pomona to .break current federallaw-s is like Pomona shooting itself in the fnot. After all, the cities are extensions of the Rtates, states extensions of OUT country, etc, And when Robles is sug- gesting that it would further burden the cit.y's Pnlice Department., I don't see where that-is the case. I'm sure the federal government isn't asking local police staff to cruise around the city as though they are INS inspectors. I would assume that. they wnuld address the legal status of an indi~ vidual if for any reason they are questioned by the police. Why is Robles concerned about people or organizations that aid un- documented immigrants being prose. cuted as smugglers? These people or organizations wouldn't be prosecuted as smugglers unless someone is aid- ing and abetting those individuals here illegally, or in other words, those committing a crime. You can't sayan one hand, don't break our city or state laws, and on the other ha~d, send the message that it's OK t.o break our federal 18\vs. And if Robles doesn't realize that., he has no business being on t.he City Council to begin with. The statement. t.hat if t.he council approved Pomona as a sanctuary city would be sending the \vrong message is an understatement. That's all Pomona needs. They might as well put up bill- boards saying, "Come to Pomona: Even if you break the law, you'll be accepted and tolerat.ed." How is this type of lunacy going t.o turn the city of Pomona around from its current problems? I think it would only add to them. YOLANDA GUTIERREZ Upland !Pull off freeways during routine traffic stops Reading about the loss of another police officer to a traffic collision by a drunken driver .iust. breaks my heart.: . So many innocent lives have been lost on our freeways because they have pulled over and become victims of tragedy. Can we not have CHP officers pull peo- ple off the freeway to the next off~ramp? Pulling over for any reason on ourheavily traveled freeways puts motorists in dan- ger. - \Vhenevel' there is a traffic stop on the freeway, traffic backs up for miles be- cause ufthe interest factor. Personally, I have driven on and ruined a tire just to make it off the freeway. Surface streets may also have hazards, but I'll take a vehicle passiog by at 35 mph versus 75 mph any day. Godspeed to Officer Bailey. DAN CENTURlONI Alta Loma !Evolution is nothing but a bOIUlDlcing ball Is it gratifying to know that tiny cosmic dust balls caught. and recently conveyed to Earth mav he the ans\\-'er to life, ac~ cording to U;ose involved in old bones and super flights - evolutionists. And su it. would nat.urallv follow that out of those microscopic. du~st halls the tree of life would evolve, and eventually the ape man. Enough of Darwin (son of a man of the cloth, minister of the gospel) and t.o the t.ruth: King David said of God's creat.ion that man was "... fearfully and wonder- :fully'made" (Psalm 139:-14)'."':;" . - . Isn't it overpmvering to know that there are many people of superior knmvl- edge who will never, ever believe the big lie of organic evolution? For the chosen of the Lord, it is said, "Ye shall know all t.hings" (! John 2:20). We can finally summarize evolution as nothihg more than an erratic, uncon- t.rolled bouncing ball. Who knows where it. will go next, and stoP! but st.op it will. Nothing in this world happens by chance. Not only does the world as a whole testi(v to the beauty, glory and power of creation, but the very dust itself: The element.s comprising the human body are exactly the same as those in the ground. To sUlllmarize the solid truth we have what God said to Adam: "In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou re- turn to the ground; for out if it wast thou taken: for dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou retun1'! (Genesis 3:19..Psalm 119:73). REV. ARCHIE 1'>. WILSON Alt.a Loma Cartoonist on target with media criticism Kudos to Gordon Campbell for his polit. ical cartoon on Feb. 17. There have been a few of his drmvings that I thought were worthy of a Pulitzer Prize. His'eritic.ism of the liberal news media is right on target.. They.are hounding Dick. Cheney. 'l1w 'White House press corps have very bad manners. They have no re- spect for the office of the vice president. They are like.~ b".llchQi spoiled bratB. Their hatred of President RUE'h lR etched in their faces. They sco\\.1 and sneer at him.1't is q'uite obvious as to whose side t.hRY are on. {FREDERICK D. MULLEN Upland Too little, itoo laite A fe\v weeks ago, more than a few Amerieans blanched at the sight ofPresi~ dent Bush henging the Medal of Freedolll around the neck of Muhammad All. Why didn't they give one to ,Jane Fonda. too? They both refused to support America during the Vietnam \Var. Ali refused to enter milit.ary service. famously dedaring, "I ain't got nothing against no Viet Cong." I still view Ali with suspicion and con- tempt becHuse of his anti-war stance. 1 and maO\' Vietnam War vets feel he f..9.iled his country miserably, leaving him a cow- ard and a traitor. Yes, I know Ali just opened a new cen- ter in Louisville to promot.e peace among all people, but I t.hink it's t.oo litt.le t.oo late. The medal t.hey hung around his neck should have said, l<This is for all those that died while you sat at home safe and free - you coward." VERNON lVlARTIN Ontario It's up to Rancho council. to save neighborhood IN Rancho Cucamonga, '. tucked away in the shadow of the 210 Freev-.'av near Mil- liken Avenue, is ~ nice little neighborhood, \\'ith modest, well. kept homes inhabited by maIl.Y grO\'i'ing families. People greet each other as they walk t.o t.he local parks, and neighbors look out for each other. We have a great elementary school where parents. stay in- volved and volunteer in the class- rooms. \Ve love our nice little neighborhood. And we need the Rancho Cucamonga City Coun- cil to help us save our neighbor- hood. Our proximity to the 210 Free- way loorns large. \\Te have noise. Our neighborhood doesn't seem quite as safe as it did hefore the freeway opened. And our city is contemplating t.he reopening of a major thoroughfare and send- ing it." traffic into the heart of our neighborhood. \Ve need our city's leaders to prevent. that from hap- pening. More than 10 F'ars ago. as plans were drawn up fnr the soon-to-be-built 210 Freeway' residents throughout t.he city turned out in droves to revie\..' the 'design, ask questions and provide input. lssues such as freeway noise, traffic patterns, increased crime and impact t.o our quality of life \\-'ere thor- oughlyexamined. The city did a good lob ad- dressing nlany is;ues. and se- clIred a pretty good deAl from Caltrans Hnd the San Bert-'wrdin(T Associated Govern- ments lSANBAGI. One of the issues of great. con- cern was the placement and de- sign of the freeway interchanges. Seemingly logical off-ramp loca- tions such as Euclid and Eti- wanda avenues were rejected for "historical" or other political reH- sons, while other more disrupti\'e locat.ions were contemplated. even though placing off-ramps at these locations could pro\-e highly disruptive to individual neighborhoods. Such was t.he case at Milliken Avenue. where the construction of the interchange would neces- sit.ate the rc-routing of Highland Avenue, 3. major thoroughfare, into our residential neighborhood. Imagine that: when the free- way is-jammed, thOUSAnds of l:lllnmuters, seeking a wa,v to by- pass the freeway. would snake their way through our neigh- borhood while aUf children are going to or from schooJ: Imagine hurried motorists t.aking a short.- cut and speeding down our streets. Exhaustive and open public hearings were held on this issue. The citizens of the Victoria Groves area were able t.o obt.ain an agreement that Highland Av- enue would be c.losed perma- nently. Subsequently, the cit.y of Rancho Cucamonga executed a l\rlemorandum of Understanding "dth Caltrans and SANBAG. which included the permanent closure of Highlaud Avenue. \Vith this provision, the Milliken Avenue interchange was in- cluded in the final plan. Overall. this was an outcome that would presen'!? a sembl[\l1ce of safety :md tranquility in t.he area. The voice of t.he common citizen was heard, and the process worked. Five years latter, a small group of residents from outside our neighborbood somehow re- opened this df)bate. Again, much public input was prodded to our Citv Council find the freeway task force. Despite overwhl:.Jrn'-, ing support. for l{ecping High. IA.nd Avenue closed, t.he original rlp.ci~lon WAR l'P\'(JrRf~d. And tJw council decided to recommend the reopening of the road to WQBt- bound trame. The issue was left open, how- ever, with a promise to revisit the situation prior to the actual re- opening of Highland Avenue. We have now surpassed a 10- year milestone. Highland Av- enue has remained closed, with ugly temporary barriers scnnvleu with graffiti being in place since the construction of the free\\'ay. The unpatrolled area within t.11P Highland clo- sure attracts loitering youths. All ofthis serves as a constant reminder to our local resi. dents that this Issue i~ not 1'c- so I v e d. and that. STEVE RENTERIA our neighbor- G U EST hood re- C 0 L U M N 1ST maioR at risk ()flosing our safety Hnd well- being. Tlw city has prO\-ided our cum- munity another opportunity to address this issue. At. a recent public hearing city staff pre- sf'nted a tn~flic study and took public comment. Amid t.his dis- cusE-ion however, is an unfortu- nate bit of untruthful and revi- sionist. retelling of the "fRets" of the decisions and agreement.s reached 10 years ago. The cit..y ",Horney, ill t,he guisE' of city staff. declares t.hat the Highiand closure was originally int.ended to he "temporary." A review of t.he reeord will lead eVen the most casual observer to conclude t.hat this assertion is either the result. of poor recol- lection, poor m1alYBis or a poor sense of the truth. In reviewing the reCEnt traffic study. it becomes apparent that. the folks who might. routinely use a reopened Highland AvenuE:' would be those who reside on the west. side"ofthe Deer Creek and must. cross the channel to take their kids to Victoria Groves School, At. a recent. public hr8ring there was not a single resident of this area \vho favured rp- opening Highlanu Avenne. As a matter of fact.. onlY one city res- ident. who lives i;l lwith~r jm- paeted neighborhood, spoke in favor of reopening H.ighland Av- enue. So. it all boils dtl\\'ll to this: Is l--lighland ^vemlP "neees5ary" for loea] use? 1 would imaginp that t.his would depend on one's def- inition of the word "necessary. ,. Can we live without Highland A\'enue reopening? \Vc've been doing so for more than six .years, therefore. common sense would indicate t.hat. it is not "necessary" for local use. There are no com- pelling l'ea!=;ons t.o l"PopE'n High- lnnd A\'cnuL'. Then' is another compelling reason to keep Highland Avenue closed. According to the Califor- nia Vehicle Code, once it lS re- opened, it will stay open ~ re- gardlef's of any impact the road mny l'3.Use. And it could never be re-dosed, at least until t.he pop- ulat.ion of San Bernardino County grows from the current. 2 million residents and exceeds 6 Inillion. Our clty lead(,~rs need to save our nice lit.tle neighborhood. and stand by the original agreement which was intended to preserve our safety and what. little tran- . quility \ve have left. They need to keep Highland AVE'lllle closed. ~ Steve Renteria is a resident of Rrf!1rho CUf'on/on[!a. ~-r~......"..'- -- IL t voters iUeS right in that t 6 in Pomona 8 to see through Je an election ow whoever 3 seat .until nage. members are so es they would ' !leone opposite I undo all the silence the peo. the majority . .' direction for 1 the special lid go to the on who would Ither council Jt want the z's pastor to deals to the ~r Pomona Uni., loyee rubber- !7, wants. esentative who 'omona police miform, badge ley were on the 6 do see thJ<;'pgh DON FORD Pomona o council 'omona Ie Pomona City ecision in call. o fill t.he vacant of calling for an that the conncil person to take Iii the November ifications of although I do rt feel there are /ledge and expe- ;he position. ,6 will be al- ght to vote - in eve talked to 'l.grees that the ('Iv. The council n 'this imrnedi- BETH BROOKS Pomona . I election pay Iy Bulletin edi- ?ly urge t.he resi. and an election istdd 6 council Icople have sacri~ . lit of democracy lcess. But here, IIlcil doesn't ,'ing people to entation is all , in their infinit.e than happy to IS (perhaps an- ployee \vou1d suf- I'S assertion that ill only sei""ve y reasoning, as :lhanced ability is draml1ticall\' n incumbent's' I is a small one to lemoeJ'atic. cit.v. So 1 RHV ror~'es and Coun- for continuing ion. The citizens most baRic of LMAN-HENSEN PomonR ~",?,-",,~-":C,,;c-,~-^ mlKlUlIDJ WIN PW1>1\I,N\ '1.... Sanctuary lunacy won't help city of ~omona I could not believe my eyes when I read the article regarding Councilman Robles asking Pomona to stand against HR 4437. Not only is he asking city residents to break the law by not upholding the . current immigration laws, but hels asking thein to break another law by aiding and abetting illegal immi- grants by employing them, against federal law. This man needs to have his head ?xamined. Asking the citizens of '. Pomona to.break current federal laws is like Pomona shooting itself in the foot. After all, the cities are extensions of the states; states extensions of our country, etc. And when Robles is sug- gesting that it would further burden the city's Police Department, I don't see where that is the case. I'm sure the federal government isn't asking local police staff to cruise around the city as though they are INS inspectors. I would assume t.hat they would address the legal status of an indi- vidual if for any reason they are questionl~d by the police; Why is Robles concerned about people or organizations that aid un~ . documented immigrants being prose. cuted as smugglers? These people or organizations wouldn't be prosecuted as smugglers unless someone is aid- ing and abetting those individuals here illegally, or in other words, those committing a crime. You can't say on one hand, don't break our city or state laws, and on the other hand, send the message that it's OK to break our federal laws. And if Robles doesn't realize that, he has no business being on the City Council to begin with. The statement that if the council approved Pomona as a sanctuary city would be sending the wrong message is an understatement. That's all Pomona needs. They might as well put up bill- boards Raying, "Come to Pomona: Even if you break the law, you'll be accepted and tolerated." How is this type of lunacy going to turn the city of Pomona around from its current problems? I think it would only add to t.hem. YOLANDA GUTIERREZ Upland Pull off freeways during routine traffic stops Reading about the loss of another police officer to a traffic collision by a drunken driver just breaks my heart. So many innocent lives have been lost on our freeways because they have pulled over and become victims of tragedy. Can we not have CHP officers pull peo- ple off the freeway to the next off-ramp? Pulling over fur any reason on our. heavily traveled freeways puts motorists in dan- ger. - \Vhenever there is a traffic stop on the freeway, traffic backs up for miles be- CAuse ufthe interest factor. Personally, I have driven on and ruined a tire just to make it oifthe freeway. Surface streets may also have hazards, but rn take a vehicle passing by at 35 mph versus 75 mph any day. Godspeed to Officer Bailey. DAN CENTURIONI Alta Loma Evoluticn is noil:ll1ing but a bouncing ball Is it gratifying to know that tiny cosmic dust balls caught and recently conveyed to Earth may be the answer to life, ac- cording to those involved in old bones and super flights - evolutioniRt.... And so it would naturally follow that out of those micros~opie du""st balls t.he tree of life \\'ould evolve, and eventually the ape man. . Enough of Darwin (son of a man ofthe cloth, minister of the gospel) and to the truth: King David said of God's creation t.hat man was "... fearfully and wonder- 'fullymade" (Psalm 139:1'4): ",.... .. Isn't it overpowering to know that there are many people of supeIior knowl- edge \"ho will never, ever believe the big lie of organic evolution? For the chosen of the Lord, it is said, "Ye shall know all things" (! John 2:20). We can finally summarize evolution as nothing more than an erraticl uncon- trolled bouncing ball. V\iho knows where it. will go next and stop, but stop it \vill. Nothing in this world happens by chance. Not only does the world as a whole testify to'the heanty. glory and power of creation, but the very dust itself: The elements comprising the human body are exactly the same as those in the ground. . To summarize t.he solid truth we have what God said to Adam: "In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, t.ill thou re. turn to the ground; for out if it wast thou taken: for dust thon art. and unt.o dust. shalt thou return" (Genesis 3:19, ,Psalm 119:73). REV. ARCHIE fl. WILSON Alta Loma Cartoonist on target with media criticism Kudos to Gordon Campbell f(Jr his polit. ical cartoon on Feb. 17. There have been a few of his drawings that I thought were worthy of a Pulitzer Prize. Hiseriticism of the liberal ne\\'s media is right. on target. They.are hounding Dick. Cheney. 'rhe \Vhite House press corps have very bad manners. Thev have no re- spect for<the tiffice ,of the vice president. They are like a bp..n.~~hpf spoiled brats. Their hatred 6rPresident Bush is etched in their faces, They scowl and sneer at him. ',It is q'uite obvious as to whose side t.h~y ar-e on. :FREDERICK D. MULLEN Upland Too little, too iail:e A fe'\\' weeks ago, more than a few Americans blanched at. t.he sight ofPresi- dent Bush hanging the Medal afFreedom arOllIld the neck of Muhammad Ali. 'Why didn't they give one to Jane Fonda, too? They both refused to support America during the Vietnam \Val'. Ali refused to enter militArY service, famously declaring, "I ain't got nothing against no Viet Cong." I still view AU with suspicion and eon. tempt because of his anti-war stance. I and manv Vietnam War vets feel he failed his country miserably, leaving him a cow- ard and a traitor. Yes, I kno\\' Ali just opened a new cen- ter in Louisville to promote peace among all people. but I t.hink it's t.oo little too late. The medal they hung around his neck should have said, "This is for all those that died while you sat. at home safe and free - you coward." VERNON MARTIN Ontalio It's lRp to Rancho council to save neighborhood IN Rancho Cucamonga, : tucked away in the shadov.' of the 210 Freewav near Mll- liken Avenue, is ~ nice little neighborhood, ;with modest. well. kept homes inhabited by mallY growing families, People greet pach other as they walk to the local parks, and neighbors look out for each other. \Ve have a great elementary school where parents stay in- volved and volunteer in the class- rooms. \Ve love our nice Httle neighborhood. And we need the Rancho Cucamonga City Coun- cil to help us save our neighbor- hood. Our proximity to the 210 Free- way looms large. We have noise. Our neighborhood doesn't seem quite as safe as it. did beftlre the freeway opened. And our city is contemplating the reopening of a major thoroughfare and send, ing its traffic into the heart of our neighborhood. \Ve need our city's leaders to prevent that from hap- pening. More than 10 yenrs n-g-o. as plans were drawll up for t.he soon-to-be-built 210 Freeway. residents throughout the ci,ty turned out in droves to review the design, ask questions and provide input. Issues such as freeway noise, traffic patterns, increased crime and impact to our quality of life were thor- oughlyexamined. The city did a good job ad- dressing many issues. and se- cured a pretty good deal from Caltrans and the San Bernardinrr Associated Govern- ments (SANBAG1. One of the issues of great con- cern was the placement and de- sign ofthe freeway lnterchanges. Seemingly logical off, ramp loca- tions such as Euclid and .Eti- wanda avenues were rejected for "historic~l" or other political rea- sons. while other more disruptive locations were contemplated, even though placing off-ramps at these locations could prove highly disruptive to individual neighborhoods. Such \V3S the case at. Milliken Avenue, where the const.ruction of the interchange would neceR- sitate the re-rout.ing of Highland Avenue, a major thoroughfare, into our residential neighborhood. Imagine that when the free- way is jammed, t.housands of t:onunuters, seeking a way to by- paSR the freeway, would snake t.heir \vay through our neigh- borhood while our children are guing to or from ~ehool. Imagine hurried motOlist.s. taking a short- cut. and speeding down our streets. Exhaustive and open public hearings were held on this issue. The citizens of the Victoria Groves area were able to obt.ain an agreement that Highland Av- enue \vould be clos;ed perma- nently. Subsequently, the city of Rancho Cucamonga executed a Memorandum of Understanding with Caltrans and SANBAG. \\'hich included the pcmnanent. closure of Highland Avenue. \Vith this provision, the Milliken Avenue interchange was in- cluded in the final plan. Overall, this was an outcome that. \\'ould preseI'\'e a semblance of safety and tranquility in t.he area, The voice of the common cit.izen \vas heard, and the process worked. Five years latter, a small group of residents from outside our neighborhood somehow re. opened this debate. Again, much public input ,".;as provided to onr eit\-' Council and t.he freev,.av t.ask force. Despite overwheln';.- ing support. for keeping High- land AveilUe closed. t.he original rh~r.iRion war: r~vp,rsl1o, fino tllP council decided to recommend the reopening of the road to west, bound traffic. The issue was left open, how- ever, with a promise to revisit the sit.uation prior to the actual re- opening of Highland Avenue. \Ve have now surpassed a 10- year milestone. Highland Av- enue has remained dosed. wit.h ugly temporary barriers scrawled with graffiti being in place since the construct.ion of the freeway. The unpatrolled area within t.he Highland clo- sure attracts loit.ering youths. All ofthis serves as a constant reminder to our local resi- den t. I' thnt this issue is not re- /"'j sol \' ed. and that STEVE RENTERIA our neighbor~ G U EST hood re- C 0 L U M N 1ST mains at risk of losing our s:lfetv and well- being. . The city has provided our com- munity another opportunity to address t.his issue. At a recent public hearing city st.aff pre- sented a t.raffic. study and took public comment. Amid this dis- cussion however. is an unfortu- nate bit of unt.ruthful and revi- slonist retelling of the "facts" of the decisions 'and agTC'cments reached 10 years agu. The city attorney, in 1.he guise of city staff, declares that tIll" Highland closure was originally intended to be "t.emporAry." A review of the record will lead eVen the most casual observer to conelude that this assert.ion if;; either the result of poor recol- lection, poor analysis or a poor sense of the truth. In reviewing the reeent traffil' st.ud.y, it bec()~les apparent that t.he folks who might routinely use a reopened Highland Avenue would be those \\'ho reside on the west side of the Deer Creek and mURt cross the channel to take their kids to Victoria Groves School. At a recent public hearlllg there was not 11 .singlp resident of this area \vho favored re- opening I1jghl~nd Avenue. As a matter of fm'.t, only (Jne city res- ident., \vho lives in nc->ither illl- paded neighborbood, spoke in favor of reopening Highland Av- enue. So, it all boils down to this: Is Highland Avenue "necessar.v" for 10011 use? I would imagine that ihis would depend on one's def- .init.ion oftbe word "necessary." Can we .live without Highland Avenue reopening'? We've been doing so for more than six years~ therefore, common sense would indicate t.hat it. is n01 '~ne('essary" for local use. Tll(~re are no em;l- pelling rea~ons to reopE'n High- land Avenue. There is another compelling reason to keep Hlghland Avenue closed. According t.o the Califor- nia Vehicle Code, once it is re- opened, it will stay open ~ re- gardless of' any impact the road rnElV cause. And it could never be re-~;losed, at least until the pop- ulation of San Bernardinu County grows from the current 2 million residents and exceeds 6 million. Our city leaders need to save our nice little neighborhood, and stand by the original agreement. \,.,'hich was intended to preserve our safety and what little tran- quilit.y w~ have left. They need to keep Highland Avenue clospd, - Stelle Renteria is a resident of Ranr.lw Cucamnn.ga, Keep Highland Closed to General Automotive Traffic Before the Rancho Cucamonga City Council - April 19th, 2006 Statement by: Thomas Spencer 1. Highland-Fairmont Design: Highland was never designed to route traffic through the Victoria neighborhoods. Highland was always designed to take this arterial traffic flow past the entrance of the Victoria Groves neighborhood. This is not a re-openinq - this is a reroutinq of traffic. The east bound traffic on 19th Street at Haven will be forced from a four lane roadway 64 feet in width down to a secondary collector road only about 36-40 feet wide. If Highland is re-routed down Fairmont, the use of this segment will steadily increase, right through neighborhood streets. A good part of that traffic will continue south....right past Victoria Groves Park and Elementary School. 2. The Austin-Foust Traffic study is flawed: The writer concludes that the south-bound traffic on Fairmont Avenue will experience no major increases if Highland were reopened. This is incorrect! As residents, we have actually observed that this occurs when Highland was temporarily connected through the Victoria tract during freeway construction. The increase in traffic is massive. Granted, that occurred at a time before the 210 was built, but back-ups on the new east-bound 210 will encourage frustrated drivers to seek short-cuts through our neighborhoods using the proposed 19th-Highland connection. 3. Most Master Planned Neighborhoods in RC are designed to limit access: Have you ever wondered why? Any police officer or traffic engineer will tell you that these neighborhoods are designed for limited access to prevent crime and reduce traffic safety issues - neighborhoods have lots of pedestrian use. Rerouting the 19th-Highland traffic through the Victoria neighborhoods will introduce serious traffic safety issues. 4. The City Council will open Pandora's Box if Highland is reopened: If the Council makes the blunder of rerouting Highland through Victoria it will be difficult to reverse. Once the rest of the city discovers a short-cut through our neighborhoods, the use of it will grow. 5. The City Council should be working to Inspire Cooperation instead of creating a divisive and protracted battle between opposing factions. I hope the City Council takes the "high-road" and decides to emphasize the benefits to both neighborhoods of permanently closing Highland. Several residents have suggested that this 3/10ths mile section could become a wonderful green- belt "trail park" connecting the neighborhoods east & west of Deer Creek. CLOSE HIGHLAND PERMANENTLY .Qpen Page 1 ofl From: To: Sent: Subject: <info@openhighlandave.com> <info@openhighlandave.com> Monday, April 17, 2006 7:28 AM Open Highland Avenue Survey Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by (info@openhighlandave.com) on Monday, April 17, 2006 at 07:28:36 option: yes 4/19/2006 Page 1 of1 2Pen From: To: Sent: Subject: <info@openhighlandave.com> <info@openhighlandave.com> Monday, April 17, 2006 5:49 PM Open Highland Avenue Survey Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by (info@openhigh1andave.com) on Monday, April 17, 2006 at 17:49:39 name: Brian Bobo address: 12274 Mountain Ash Ct. phone: 909-821-5139 option: yes comments: Trafic is getting worse every day, please open this much needed portion of Highland Ave. 4/19/2006 Page 1 ofl 2pen From: To: Sent: Subject: <info@openhighlandave.com> <info@openhighlandave.com> Monday, April 17, 2006 5:13 AM Open Highland Avenue Survey Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by (infu.@Qpenhighlandave.com) on Monday, April 17, 2006 at 05: 12:51 name: Lora Melton address: 13608 Van Horn Circle West phone: unlisted option: yes comments: Anything that will help with our traffic problems is a wonderful idea! OPEN IT UP!! 4/19/2006 Page 1 of 1 2pen From: To: Sent: Subject: <info@openhighlandave.com> <info@openhighlandave.com> Sunday, April 16, 2006 3:22 PM Open Highland Avenue Survey Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by (info@openhighlandave.com) on Sunday, April 16, 2006 at 15 :22: 17 name: bRICSHA CLEMONS address: 5219CARTILLA AVE phone: 9094760930 option: yes 4/19/2006 Page I of I .Qpen From: To: Sent: Subject: <info@openhighlandave.com> <info@openhighlandave.com> Sunday, April 16, 2006 3:21 PM Open Highland Avenue Survey Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by (info@openhighlandave.com) on Sunday, April 16, 2006 at 15:21 :38 name: HAROLD clemons address: 5219 CARTILLA AVE phone: 9094760930 option: yes 4/19/2006 Page 1 of1 2Pen From: To: Sent: Subject: <info@openhighlandave.com> <info@openhighlandave.com> Sunday, April 16, 2006 3:20 PM Open Highland Avenue Survey Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by (info@openhighlandave.com) on Sunday, April 16, 2006 at 15:20:20 name: carmen clemons address: 5219CARTILLA AVE phone: 9094760930 option: yes 4/19/2006 Page 1 of1 Open From: To: Sent: Subject: <info@openhighlandave.com> <info@openhighlandave.com> Sunday, April 16, 2006 2:59 PM. Open Highland Avenue Survey Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by (info@Ql1enhighlandave.com) on Sunday, April 16, 2006 at 14:59:33 name: nicole fitzgerald address: 6971 stanislaus place phone: 484-2229 option: yes 4/1912006 Page 1 of1 ,2pen From: To: Sent: Subject: <info@openhighlandave.com> <info@openhighlandave.com> Sunday, April 16, 20061:25 PM Open Highland Avenue Survey Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by (info@openhighlandave.com) on Sunday, April 16, 2006 at 13:25:26 name: John Phillips address: 6550 Etiwanda Ave phone: 909-899-8131 option: yes 4/19/2006 Page 1 of 1 2Pen From: To: Sent: Subject: <info@openhighlandave.com> <info@openhighlandave.com> Friday, March 10,200610:57 AM Open Highland Avenue Survey Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by (info@openhighlandave.com) on Friday, March 10,2006 at 09:57:09 name: IOn lasswell address: 7008 la lanza ct alta loma ca 91701 phone: 9377320 option: yes 4/19/2006 2Pen Page 1 ofl From: To: Sent: Subject: <info@openhighlandave.com> <info@openhighlandave.com> Wednesday, March 15,20065:48 PM Open Highland Avenue Survey Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by (info@openhighlandave.com)on Wednesday, March 15, 2006 at 16:48:54 name: cathy hamilton address: 6453 buckthorn ave phone: 909 987-5388 option: yes comments: much easier to get around than take that 210 fwy, very crowed in am and pm, opening up that small piece of road would really help a lot. WOULDN'T WE ALL LIKE ARE STREETS TO DEAD-END, AND HAVE NO TRAFFIC!! QUITE CRYING, IT WAS OPENED WHEN YOU MOVED IN!! 4/19/2006 Page 1 ofl gpen From: To: Sent: Subject: <info@openhighlandave.com> <info@openhighlandave.com> Wednesday, March 15,20069:26 PM Open Highland Avenue Survey Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by (info@openhighlandave.com) on Wednesday, March 15, 2006 at 20:26:38 name: john address: 14460 dittmar phone: 9094636712 option: yes comments: Nice shirt...i saw you on wenday. at the city council meeting....nice shirt fuck bag.... let me know where i can get one 4/19/2006 Page I of1 ,2pen From: To: Sent: Subject: <info@openhighlandave.com> <info@openhighlandave.com> Wednesday, March 15, 2006 10:19 PM Open Highland Avenue Survey Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by (info@openhighlandave.com)on Wednesday, March 15, 2006 at 21:19:30 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- name: Lindsy Broome address: 6239 Bronco PI. phone: 909-463-5920 option: yes --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4/19/2006 Page I ofl gpen From: To: Sent: Subject: <info@openhighlandave.com> <info@openhighlandave.com> Sunday, April 16, 2006 8:17 AM Open Highland Avenue Survey Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by (info@openhighlandave.com) on Sunday, April 16, 2006 at 08:17:47 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- name: ron moody address: san benito ave option: yes --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4/19/2006 Page I ofl 2Pen From: To: Sent: Subject: <info@openhighlandave.com> <info@openhighlandave.com> Sunday, April 16, 2006 10:11 AM Open Highland Avenue Survey Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by (info@openhighlandave.com) on Sunday, April 16, 2006 at 10: II :49 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- name: Randy Robertson address: 9388 Highland Ave phone: 909-941-7187 option: yes --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4/19/2006 Page 1 of 1 2,Pen From: To: Sent: Subject: <info@openhighlandave.com> <info@openhighlandave.com> Sunday, April 16, 2006 1 :25 PM Open Highland Avenue Survey Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by (info@openhighlandave.com) on Sunday, April 16, 2006 at 13:25:26 name: John Phillips address: 6550 Etiwanda Ave phone: 909-899-8131 option: yes 4/19/2006 Page 1 of1 E,Pen From: To: Sent: Subject: <info@openhighlandave.com> <info@openhighlandave.com> Sunday, April 16, 2006 11 :43 AM Open Highland Avenue Survey Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by (info@openhighlandave.com) on Sunday, April 16, 2006 at 11:43:46 -----------------~--------------------------------------------------------- name: Dan Plante address: 7379 Henbane St. phone: (909) 989-9665 option: yes --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4/19/2006 Page I ofl 2Pen From: To: Sent: Subject: <info@openhighlandave.com> <info@openhighlandave.com> Sunday, April 16, 2006 2:59 PM. Open Highland Avenue Survey Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by (info@openhighlandave.com) on Sunday, April 16, 2006 at 14:59:33 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- name: nicole fitzgerald address: 6971 stanislaus place phone: 484-2229 option: yes 4/19/2006 Page I of I 2Pen From: To: Sent: Subject: <info@openhighlandave.com> <info@openhighlandave.com> Sunday, April 16, 2006 3:20 PM Open Highland Avenue Survey Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by (info@openhighlandave.com) on Sunday, April 16, 2006 at 15:20:20 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- name: carmen clemons address: 5219 CARTILLA AVE phone: 9094760930 option: yes 4/19/2006 Page I ofl Epen From: To: Sent: Subject: <info@openhighlandave.com> <info@openhighlandave.com> Wednesday, April 19, 20062:33 PM Open Highland Avenue Survey Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by (info@openhighlandave.com) on Wednesday, April 19, 2006 at 14:33:17 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- name: Linda Yoder address: 8007 Rosebud Street, Alta Loma option: yes 4/19/2006 Page 1 of1 2Pen From: To: Sent: Subject: <info@openhighlandave.com> <info@openhighlandave.com> Sunday, April 16, 2006 3:21 PM Open Highland Avenue Survey Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by (info@openhigh1andave.com)onSunday, April 16, 2006 at 15:21:38 name: HAROLD clemons address: 5219 CARTILLA AVE phone: 9094760930 option: yes 4/19/2006