The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1996/03/05 - Agenda Packet - AdjournedCITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ADJOURNED MEETING 7:00 P.M. TUESDAY March 5, 1996 Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 City Counciimembers William J. Alexander, Mayor Rex Gutierrez, Mayor Pro Tem Paul Biane, Councilmember James V. Curatalo, Councilmember Diane Williams, Councilmember Jack Lain, City Manager James L. Markman, City Attorney Debra J. Adams, City Clerk City Office: 989-1851 City Council Agenda March.5, 1996 All iter4 submitted forthe City Council Agenda must he in writing. The deadline for submitting these ibms is 6:00 p.m. on the Tuesday prior to the meeting. The City Cierk's Office receives all such items. e A. CALL TO ORDER - ADJOURNED MEETING Pledge of Allegiance. Ceremony will be led by Brownie Girl Scout Troop 1111. Roll Call: Alexander Biane , Curatalo GuUerr;z , and Willlares__ B.' ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS Presentation of a Proclamation t~ Rancho Cucamonga WaI-Mart for their civic spirit and contribuUon to the Senior Center. Presentation of a Proclamation declaring the week of March 10-16 as Girl Scout Week. C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously ihcluded on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a'subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. D. CONSENT CALENDAR *. The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted 'upon by the CounCil at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember or member of the audience for discussion. 1. - Approval of Minutes: February 7, 1996 , Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 2/14/96 and 2/21/96; and Payroll ending 2/8/96 for the total amount of $1,638,228.11. 3. Approval to use Epicenter for D.A.R.E. baseball clinic. Approval' to donate twenty (20) vests to the Youth Accountability Board on a one-time basis. 11 13 City Council Agenda March 5, 1996 5. Approval of a Resolution revising the definition of fixed assets. RESOLUTION NO. 96-028 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A NEW DEFINITION OF FIXED ASSETS e Approval to declare surplus City owned van to be donated to Meals on Wheels program currently operating from RCSC. Approval to purchase eight (8) '/z-Ton Pick-Up Trucks from Rotolo Chewolet of Fontana, California, through a piggy-back/cooperative purchase with the County of San Bemardino, California. Funding for four of the Pick-Up Trucks will be from Intergovernmental Services Account No. 72-4225-7045 and Four are to be funded from nine (9) different accounts for a total of $140,000.00. Approval to purchase six (6) Ford F-250 Pick-Up Trucks and one (1) Cargo Van from Fairview Ford Sales, Incorporated of San Bernardino, California, as the lowest responsible bidder in the amount of $185,490.86, to be funded from Account No. 72-4225- 7045. e 10. Approval of the Environmental Assessment Declaration and Award and Authorization for Execution of Contract (CO 96-009) for Northeast Park and East Avenue Street Improvements. Approval to execute the Cost and Maintenance Agreement (CO 96- 010) between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company (A.T. & S.F.) For the proposed improvement of the A.T. & S.F. spur crossing of Arrow Route, located west of Milliken Avenue, and designated as CPUC Crossing No. 2-96.4-C. RESOLUTION NO. 96-029 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE EXECUTION OF THE COST AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY FOR THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT OF THE A.T. & S.F. SPUR CROSSING OF ARROW ROUTE, DESIGNATED AS CPUC CROSSING NO. 2-96.4-C 11. Approval to execute the Improvement Agreement and Security for the Fourth Street Improvements, located between Milliken Avenue and Buffalo Avenue, associated with Assessment District No. 108 within the City of Ontario, submitted by Vance Corporation. 2 14 15 17 18 19 20 61 62 63 City Council Agenda March 5, 1996 3 12. RESOLUTION NO. 96-030 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND SECURITY FOR FOURTH STREET IMPROVEMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 108 WITHIN THE CITY OF ONTARIO Approval to authorize the City Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion" for Ellena Park Phase I Improvements. RESOLUTION NO. 96-031 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR ELLENA PARK PHASE I AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 65 66 67 E. CONSENT ORDINANCES The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first reading. Second readings are expected to he routine and non- controversial. They will he acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion. APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE PERS CONTRACT ('CO 188) ORDINANCE NO. 552 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM (PERS) CONTRACT APPROVAL TO ESTABLISH A SPEED LIMIT OF 45 MPH ON 6TH STREET FROM WEST CITY LIMITS TO ARCHIBALD AVENUE ORDINANCE NO. 553 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 10.20.020 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY CODE REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN CITY STREETS 68 72 City Council Agenda March 5, 1996 F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony, No Items Submitted. 4 G. PUBUC HEARINGS The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. The Chair will open the sting to receive public testimony. No Items Submitted. H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. No Items Submitted. I. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. No Items Submitted. J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this meeting, only identified for the next meeting. K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and piece for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Counc. from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to he limited to five minutes per individual. City Council Agenda March 5, 1996 5 L. ADJOURNMENT MEETING TO ADJOURN TO EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS PROPERTY NEGOTIATIONS PER GOVERNMENT CODE 54956.8, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND ROCHESTER AVENUE; VALLEY BASEBALL AND JERRY FULWOOD, DEPUTY CITY MANAGER, NEGOTIATING PARTIES; REGARDING TERMS OF PAYMENT. I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby cerlify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on FebruaW 29, 1996, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. February 7, 1996 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Re~iular Meeting A. CALL TO ORDER A regular rneeling of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, February 7, 1996, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Ddve, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander. Present ware Coundlmembers: Paul Biane, James Curatalo, Rex Guljerrez, Diane Williams and Mayor William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager; Linda D. Daniels, RDA Manager; Rick Gomez, Community Development Director; Brad Buller, City Planner; Nancy Fong, Senior Planner; Bill Makshanoff, Building Official; Robert Dominguez, Administrative Sen~?.es Directs, Deborah Clark, LibraW Manager; Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager; Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst II; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Capt. Ron Bieberdorf, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS No announcements or presentations were made. C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC C1. Mr. Lansdale, Sapphire, felt the utility tax should be taken away now. He did not feel it was legal. Mayor Alexander asked him if he was aware there was a measure in place to lower the utility tax. Mr. Lansdale stated no. C2. D.J. Diomedes, Dresden Court, stated there is a business that intends on puffing a health care facility in his neighborhoed. He did not feel it should be allowed in his neighborhoed. Mayor Alexander suggested that Mr. Diomedes talk to Mr. Buller, and that if needed, it could come back at a future meeting for the Council to discuss. C3. John Solis, 8196 Dresden, added he felt the health care business would deteriorate his property value and did not feel it should be allowed. C4. David Needham did not feel the health care business should be permitted on his street on Dresden. City Council Minutes February 7, 1996 Page 2 C5. Dan Centrioni, Dresden Court, stated he objected to this facility going in his neighborhood. He felt he should have been notified before this was approved. Brad Buller, City Planner, confirmed he will be meeting with these residents. D. CONSENT CALENDAR Jack Lam, City Manager, stated Item D6 should be remove~ from the agenda and that It would come back at a future meeting. Tom Hendemon, Quakes Baseball, asked that Item D4 be pulled for discussion. D1. Approval of Minutes: December 20, 1995 Joint Meeting D2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 1/10/96 and 1/17/96; and Payroll ending 1/11/96 for the total amount of $2,316,006.99. D3. Approval to execute a Memorandum of Understanding (CO 96-004) for outlining building permIt issuance relating to the retrofit of a flood wall for Tract 13566-3, located south of Wilson Avenue adjacent to the San Sevaine Basins, submitted by Gentra Capital Corporation. D4. Approval to execute an agreement (CO 96-005) with Acts Concerts to provide a concert sedes at the Epicenter during Calendar Year 1996. ITEM REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION BY TOM HENDERSON, QUAKES BASEBALL. D5. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and Ordedng the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 7 for CUP 94-07, located at the southeast corner of East and Highland Avenue, submitted by W.S.D.C. Inc. RESOLUTION NO. 96-008 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR CUP 94-07 RESOLUTION NO. 96-009 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND 7 FOR CUP 94-07 D6. Approval to authorize the C~' Engineer to file a "Notice of Cc.~pletion for Elione Park Phase I h~prove~ent~. ITEM REMOVED FROM AGENDA. REP_.,OLUTION NO. 06 010 A REeOLUTION OF TI It, CITY COUNCIL OF TI Ir' CITY OF RANC~IO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCr,PTING TI IE PUDLIC IMPROVr,MENTS FOR ELLr'NA PARK R IAP.~ I AND AUTI IORIZING TI IF FILING OF A NOTICr, OF COMPLETION FOR Tt IE WORK City Council Minutes February 7, 1996 Page 3 MOTION: Moved by Willjams, seconded by Biane to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports contained in the Consent Calendar with the exception of items D6 and D4. Motion carded unanimously, 5-0. DISCUSSION OF ITEM D4. Approval to execute an agreement (CO 964)05) with Acts Concerts to provide a concert series at the Epicenter during Calendar Year 1996. Tom Henderson, ~ce President of the Quakes, slated he had problems with the contract as proposed. He pointed out that this is a binding contract for three years and felt it was missing the word "quality". He slated he did no{ like tislng up the facility for one year period of lime with no guarantee whatsoever. He referred to Item 7 in the contract which states that Acts shall have the exclusive right to produce musical concerts performed by professional musicians at the stadium other than concerts performed by or on behalf oftsx exempt civic or nonprofit organizations." He stated what Acts is being given here is exclusivity. He felt if Acts did not want to, they would not have to provide any concerts at all. He referred to Page 1, Item 1 which states, "in accordance with the provisions hereof, Acts shall produce musical concerts at lhe stadium during calendar years 1996, 1997 and 1998. It is anticipated that Acts shall produce 6 to 12 such concerts in each of said calendar years. In the event Acts does not produce at leaat 6 concerts dudng 1996 or any other years, agreement shall be deemed to be terminated at the conclusion of the calendar year, during which less than 6 such concerts occur." He felt the problem with this is that Acts can produce 6 concerts and automatically renew. He felt by producing anything under 6 they are still tieing up the facility for the whole year and basically own the Epicenter for that enlke calendar year exclusively. He stated they are still hoping to bring the Beach Boys back this year, but they are being locked out because of Acts. He stated he knows of other musical promoters that are interested in producing concerts at the Epicenter. He felt this contract has no guarantees and did not agree with it. He felt the contract did not include enough information in it with no guarantees. He felt the City was puffing itself in an irreversible position. James Markman, City Allorney, slated he did not agree with Mr. Henderson's comments. He presented some history about the Quakes doing concerts at the stadium and how they failed. He said they have only produced one concert. He stated this contract gives Acts the opportunity to do more of what they have already proven themeelves capable of doing. He stated the City is giving somebody the opportunity to market the Epicenter for musical concerts on a basis where they can go out and get bands, etc. to do a concert through them. He said they would also seek sponsors forthe concert as well. He pointed out that one thing that is in the contract is that every concert has to be pre-approved by the City Manager. Mayor Alexander asked if the Quakes wanted to work with Acts Concerts, could they legally do this. James Markman, City Attorney, stated yes. Councilmember Gutierrez asked if this contract is equal to what is in the Quakes contract. James Markman, City Attorney, informed him what the contract consists of and that it serves the purpose it is supposed to serve and that is to promote a concert venue for the community and bdng in another return on the sladium so that it can pay for the oporafion of the sports fields. He stated if Mr. Burke does not arrange for six concerts, the City can terminate the contract if they want to. Tom Henderson, Quakes, pointed out the quality of people that worked on the Chicago concert and felt they had no experience or training to do this. He also asked how much money was made or lost from this concert. He reiterated he did not agree with the wording of the contract. Councilmember Biane asked Mr. Burke to inform the Council about Acts Concerts. City Council Minutes February 7, 1996 Page 4 Ron Burke, Acts Concerts, felt they got a real good start last year with the concerts held at the Epicenter. He stated he has documentation that indicates the Quakes would do concerts at the Epicenter, but that they later backed out. He stated he then came to the City to finish what the Quakes would not do. He stated he would like to continue with the concerts and build from the Chicago concert. He felt it was important to have an exclusive contract. Councilmember Williams clarified that the contract does allow for anyone to work through Acts to bring any concert to the Epicenter. Mr, Burke stated that was correct. MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Curatalo to approve Item D4. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. No items ware submitted. E. CONSENT ORDINANCES F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS F1. CONSIDERATION OF PERMIT APPLICATION BY COLE SCHAEFER AMBULANCE TO PROVIDE BLS AMBUI ANCE SERVICES IN RANCHO CUCAMONGA (Continued from January 3, 1996) Staff report presented by Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public headng. Addressing the City Council were: Francis Dow~ng, Cole Schaefer Ambulance, stated they have been doing business in the City for many years and that they have had permits in pdor years. He felt they have had a permit more than what the City is saying they have had. He stated it is not their intention to upset the service of the current ambulance prorider. He stated they have a current contract to provide service to the Quakes and hope to work with them against next year. Councilmember Gutierrez asked how many calls they make. Mr. Dowfing stated about 3 - 4 per month. Councilmember Biane asked what happens if a patient changes from a BLS to an ALS patient. Bdan Scott, Cole Schaefer Ambulance, stated they would provide CPR and get them to the closest hospital ASAP. Councilmember Curatalo asked where the ambulance is stationed that responds to Quakes calls. Mr. Scott stated they are stationed at the stadium and that the response time is about I - 2 minutes. Councilmember Curatalo then asked what would the response time be if it were an ALS incident. Mr. Scott stated about 7 minutes. Councilmember Williams asked about the permit that they want and why they want it. City Coundl Minutes February 7, 1996 Page 5 Mr. Dowling stated if they are denied the permit, they will not be able to do business in Rancho Cucamonga. Coundlmember Cumtalo pointed out this is basic life support service. Teryl Cude, MedTrans, presented information on why Cole Schaefer should not be granted a permit. He conlinued to give background information on MedTmns. He told about the service they provide to Jim McNichols, MedTrans, sited he worked out the agreement with his company and the City. He stated he did not agree that Cole Schaefer has been here 30 years. He stated Cote Schaefer was asked in 1993 to get a permit which they did not admit to. He felt there was a standard in the community and that is what the Council should measure up to. Coundlmember Williams asked how many BLS calls they get in one month. Jim McNichols stated about 300. Councilmember Williams asked how many ALS calls there were. Jim McNichois s~ded about 4,800 per year. He continued to request that the Council deny the permit for Cole Schaefer. Manny Galvez, works for Cole Schaefer and resident of the City, felt their emergency care service was great. He wondered why all of a sudden was a permit needed. He stated they have been doing business for many yeare and would like to continue to do so. Mr. Dowling stated MedTmns hand picks their calls and that they have refused to service certain areas. He stated ifthey get a permit tonight, they will look for a station in Rancho Cucamonga. He asked that they be granted the permit. There being no further response, the public hearing was closed. Chief Michael, Fire District, stated he did not know if there is a need for an additional previder. He pointed out that in 1993 Duane Baker had sent a letter to Cole Schaefer requesting they submit a permit to have ambulance services in the City. Mayor Alexander asked what staffs recommendation is. Chief Michael, Fire District, stated it would be to deny the permit. Mayor Alexander asked the same question of Mr. Markman. James Markman, City Attorney, stated the recommendation would be to submit a Resolution at the next meeting with findings to either grant or deny the permit. MOTION: Moved by Curatalo, seconded by Gutierrez to deny the permit and to prepare a Resolution to state same for the next meeting. City Council Minutes February 7, 1996 Page 6 Councilmember Gutierrez stated he appredates what Cole Schaefer is trying to do by doing business and crealing compelton. He did not feel it was right to take business away from MedTrans. He stated he was not convinced there was a public need to have another ambulance company in the City. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. James Markman, City Attorney, stated a Resolulion will come beck at the next meeting as directed by the Council. A recess was taken at 8:42 p.m. The Council reconvened at 8:56 p.m. with all members present. F2. CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 95-26 - SAM'S PLACE - Consideration of an appeal of the Planning Commission's decision denying a request to serve distilled liquor in conjunction with a restaurant and bliard hall, located at 6620 Carnelian Street, in the Neighborhood Commercial Distdct - APN: 201-811-56, 59, 60, and 61. Staff repod presented by Nancy Fong, Senior Planner. Councilmember Gutierrez asked what their use is now. Nancy Fong, Senior Planner, stated right now they are allowed to serve beer and wine. Councilmember Willjams pointed out that the hours of operation had been reduced from before. Nancy Fong, Senior Planner, added that the police calls to this establishment are also less in number. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council were: John Mannedno, Base Une Road and representing Sam's Place and Mr. Pellegdno, clarified that the hours of operalion are from 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. He stated they are not appealing the entertainment permit, only the CUP for distilled spirits. He stated if Mr. Pellegrino were allowed to sell dislilled spirits, his profit margin would increase by 300%. He referred to the graph on page 46 and felt there were more police calls for the overall shopping center than there were for Sam's Place. He asked those supporling Sam's Place to stand up. A large group stood from the audience. He pointed out if the CUP is granted, they are willing to have their performance reviewed within a reasonable timeframe. Coundlmember Willjams inquired as to what level of entertainment is currently allowed. John Mannedno stated karaoke. Councilmember Willjams commented that the City has not received any complaints about Sam's Place because people are not leaving at 2:00 a.m. honking their horns and being loud. Gary Bemis spoke about some of the letters the Council had received supporting Sam's Place. Jack Agapay stated his business is to help bring businesses into a City. He stated Sam's Place has been involved in the community. He pointed out he had done his own noise survey in the neighborhood near Sam's Place and that the only noise he could hear were cars and trucks, not loud noise from Sam's Place. City Council Minutes February 7, 1996 Page 7 Terry Hodline slated she felt Sam's Place was a friendly and safe place. She stated she didn~ go there to drink, but went there because she liked the people. She felt the Citys revenue would go up if Sam's revenue went up. Joe Fabis, 6611 Topaz, felt the noise level is out of control and asked the Council to deny their Conditional Use Permit. He felt commercial and residential should be kept separately. Ray Douglas told what a good place Sam°s is and how he ceres for the people that go thera. He asked that Sam's permit be granted. Ralph Willjams, 7461 Kirkwood, felt his permit should be granted. Hugh Harrison stated he is opposed to Sam°s Place being granted a liquor license. He stated he does not always cell the police when there has been a noise problem. He asked that the permit be denied. James Caruso pointed out that Sam's Place has increased in size and that it has gotten quieter. John Mannerino pointed out that they are willing to be reassessed in a reasonable amount of time as to how they are doing if the CUP is granted. James Markman, City Attomey, asked if the Coundl were to grant this by Resolution, he asked if they ara willing to waive their right to have this permit run with the land and that essentially it will have to be reissued by the same type of proceeding at the Council level six months from now, nine months from now. John Mannerino stated when the facility was the Boar's Head the Council established periodic review which was brought before the Council. He stated his offer is not to make it a CUP running with the land, but to voluntarily submit their reviews as opposed to their being a complaint and waiting for the Planning staff do something. James Markman, City Attomey, slated current cese law dictates that a permit runs with the land so even though the Council might review it, the permit would remain no matter what that review showed unless there was a revocation to commence, which can happen at any time the issue comes before the staff anyway. He also pointed out that if the liquor license is transferred and the bar is sold under different management, the now owner has absolutely the same right to operate as Mr. Pellegrino does. John Mannedno pointed out that if the business is transferred to someone else and the standard of operalion were to he diminished, the Council would have the right to revoke this permit subject to hearings through the Planning Commission and the City Council. Mr. Harrison pointed out that Mr. Pellegdno has a lot of supporters in the audience, but asked how many of them live behind the establishment and have to put up with the noise all of the time. Mr. Pellegrino pointed out that Radio Shack has been robbed 9 times in one year and that the police cells are not always because of Sam's Place. There being no further public input, the public hearing was closed. Councilmember Iliams told the history of what has gone on with Sam's Place being before the Council. She asked if he had added air conditioning so the beck door does not have to be open. She stated she could not see how the liquor license would change anything. She felt the issues previously discussed was the entertainment permit. She stated if there are any problems with granting the CUP she would be asking for there to be a revocation hearing. City Coundl Minutes February 7, 1996 Page 8 Mayor Alexander stated he would not go along with the entertainment, but that he would go along with the alcohol license. He stated he would be in favor of revoking the CUP if there are problems because of allowing the liquor. Councilmember Gutiermz stated he did not see how the liquor would cause an increase in complaints. He stated he could not deny Sam the liquor license. He felt Sam should be given a chance. Councilmember Bane thanked the residents and patrons of Sam's for being at the meeting tonight. He stated he would support the liquor permit. Councilmember Curatalo applauded Sam for his business efforts. He stated he would not suppert staffs recommendation because he did not see a reason to approve the CUP. James Markman, City Attomey, stated a Resolution needed to come back at the next meeting to support what the Council's desire is. Brad Buffer, City Planner, asked if the Council was interested in including some condition about a sequence of reviews as was offered by the applicant. James Markman, City Attorney, stated he felt staff should give direction as part of this. RESOLUTION NO. 96-011 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING THE APPEAL AND UPHOLDING THE PLANNING CO!VlVIISSION'S DECISION IN DENYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 95-26 FOR THE REQUEST TO SERVE DISTILLED LIQUOR IN CONJUNCTION WITH AN EXISTING RESTAURANT AND BILLlARD HALL, LOCATED AT 6620 CARNELIAN STREET, IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 201-811-56, 59, 60 AND 61 MOTION: IVloved by Gutiermz, seconded by Biane to bring back a Resolution to grant the applicant's appeal at the next Council meeting. Motion carded 4-1 (Curatalo voted no). F3. CONSIDERATION OF A NEW COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE - Including and amendment which will establish facility rentals and related fees forthe Adult Sports Complex, adjust recreation program fees, and establish geographic information system fees. Staff report presented by Robert Dominguez, Administrative Services Director. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response. the public headng was closed. RESOLUTION NO. 96-012 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A NEW COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE FOR PERMITS AND SERVICES PROVIDED BY ALL CITY DEPARTMENTS, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA POLICE DEPARTMENT, BY MODIFYING CERTAIN FEES ESTABLISHED IN RESOLUTION NO. 94-091 City Council Minutes FebmaW 7, 1996 Page 9 MOTION: Moved by Gutiermz, seconded by Biane to approve Resolution No. 96-012. unanimously, 5-0. Motion carried No items were submitted. G. PUBLIC HEARINGS No items were submitted. H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS I. COUNCIL BUSINESS I1. DISCUSSION OF RESIDENT'S REQUEST FOR FRONT YARD LAWN MAINTENANCE (Oral Discussion) Councilmember Gutierrez sited he brought this before the entire Council because there is a certain neighborhood that has a lot of brown lawns and suggested there should possibly be a cedain quality of landscaping maintained at residences. He stated he would like to enact an ordinance to require certain regulations of the residents as does Covina and Fontana. He stated he felt if this is adopted, that Cede Enforcement would require additional help to enforce this. Coundlmember Cumtalo stated he felt there were two areas being dealt with here - one was property that is owner occupied and possibly a lot of rental property. He felt it was a little too intrusive to put further restrictions on owner occupied property. He felt there should be some maintenance control for rental properties. He felt beth of the areas should be handled separately. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he felt there was a state law that states a landlord would not get a tax deduction from the property if he is not in compliance with the Ordinance which the City would have to have in place. Bill Makshanoff, Building Official, stated he would want to investigate this further with Mr. Markman and work out the details for this aspect of the rental properties. Counciimember Gulierrez stated he knew of two families that had to leave the meeting tonight that expressed their desire to him to have something like this put in place like the green lawn ordinance. Mayor Alexander opened the meeljng for public comment. Addressing the City Council were: Letha Eledon, 7260 Corte Place, stated she had pictures for the Council to review. She did not feel this was an isolated issue, that it was everywhere. She stated it was not just renters. She felt the V'K~ria area has gone down significantly. She stated she felt the City's easement should be kept up also. She felt renters should have to keep up their property just like a residence that is owner occupied. City Council Minutes February 7, 1996 Page 10 Greg Durst, representing residents on Mango and Taupe, made comments about how the neighborhood he lives in wants residents to keep their lawns green. He stated they would like the Munidpai Code revised to include regulations for green lawns. He felt banks should have to comply with this also when a foreclosure of property is involved. He stated he is unhappy with a neighbor of his who does not keep up their property. Nancy Negredi stated she would like the City to pass an ordinance to help keep lawns maintained. Councilmember Gulierrez concurred that renters and property ownere should be approached differently. Councilmember Wiiams slated she felt there was already something in place, but that it needs to be enforced. She added she agreed with what Councilmember Curatalo was saying, that by changing this the City might be geffing a little too technical. She felt we had the law already, but not the manpower to enforce it. Rick Gomez, Community Development Diredor, stated st. aft is doing what they can with the authority they have been given. He stated staff needs further direction to go to the next level. Coundlmembor Gutierrez stated he was told that the City can't go further with the ordinance the way it is. He stated he would like to compare our ordinance with other cities as far as the wording. He felt there needed to be away to enforce what is already on the books. He stated he would be willing to work with staff to develop something. Coundlmember Willjams felt the first step should be to look at what the City currently already has in place. Councilmember Gutierrez suggested he and Councilmember Curatalo work together with staff on this matter. Mayor Alexander suggested the concerned residents be notified when this does come back to the Council for further consideration. Tom Schollenberger, CCWD, stated they do have regulations against excessive watering, and that this should not be abused to put green lawns in place. ACTION: Gutierrez and Curatalo to work on this issue and bring it back to the entire Council. 12. DISCUSSION OF RESIDFNT'S REQUEST TO DISCUSS LISA SUN'S (ETIWANDA HIGH SCHOOl.} WASHINGTON D.C. TRIP (Oral Discussion) Sylvia W'mland, Cedar Mountain and President of the Community Council at Etiwanda High School, asked for some type of funding to help get Lisa Sun to Washington D.C. She asked for suggestions to help her. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he felt he could raise the money for her, not through the City, but on his own. Councilmember Williams felt it would be nice for the student to come back to the Council and report on her experience. She stated she would be willing to contribute to her. Mrs. Winland stated she would send them information and be sure Lisa does report back to the Council. City Council Minutes February 7, 1996 Page 11 13. RFPORT FROM CABLF TELEVISION SUBCOMMITTEE ON MARKS CABLEVISION Staff repod presented by Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager. Coundlmembem Bane and Guljerrez stated they felt customer se~ce issues were very important. They did not agree with any kind of discounts for certain individuals because it would not be completely fair. Councilmember Gulierrez felt a customer should be compensated when their cable does go out. They should not have to call in for the refund, but that it should be automatic. Coundlmember Biane brought up the fact of using PEG access to advertise a reward for cable vandals. He stated he felt he and Coundlmember Gutierrez were in agreement to put on PEG access what the reward is that is currently being offered by Marks. Tim Kelly, General Manager Marks Cablevision, stated he would be happy to negotiate any customer service standards as long as his competitors have to do the same thing. Coundlmember Gutierrez asked if he would talk to Bill Marks Sr. about giving refunds when there is an outage. Mr. Kelly stated they have no way of telling which homes have an outage. Sean Hogue, Marks Cablevision, stated at the last meeting Marks Cablevision agreed to compensate people when there is an outage. He asked if they could have more notice for the Subcommittee meelings and could they have more l~me at a meeting to explain their case. J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING No items were identified for the next meeting. K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC No communications were made from the public. L. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Williams to adjourn to Executive Session to discuss Property Negotiations per Government Code 54956.8, located at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue; Valley Baseball and Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager, negotiating perlies; regarding terms of peyrnent. Motion carded unanimously, 5-0. Meeting adjourned at 11:34 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: CZTY OF RANCNO CUCAMQNGA LZST OF WARRANTS FOR PERZOO: 02-14-96 C95/96) RUN DATE: 02/14/96 PAGE: 1 VENDOR NAME ZTEM DESCRZPTZON NARR NO WARR. ART. 211 A P Z ALARM SYSTEMS 1098 Ao G. ENGZNEERZNG 7764 A.A. ZNTERCONT, ZNC. 7766 A.M. REZTER DEV CO 7767 A.K. ZNVESTRENT 2732 ABC LOCKSRZTHS 7765 ABC PRODUCTS CO 4347 ACCURATE SMOGt AUTO, TRUCK 7768 ACRE GENERAL 4361 AOVANCEO COPY SYSTEMS 7769 ALLMARKt ZNCo 3778 ALPERTe NELANZE 6401 ALTAZR GASES AND EQUZPRENTt ZNC° 1430 ARERZCAN BUSZNESS FORMS 4436 AMERZTECN LZBRARY SERVZCES 7170 AMPAC TZRE DZSTRZBUTOR 2693 AMTECM RELZABLE ELEVATOR 7750 ANA° M° ABV-KHALAF 7771 ANGZE*S NOLO FZNZSHZNG 7772 ASTRO EQUZPMENT SALES 7755 AUSTTN, LAURA 7773 AUTO CELLULAR ZZ 1061 AMAROS 8Y CHAMPZON 4551 BACHRANt JANZCE 841 BANK OF AMERZCA-CORPORATE 841 BANK OF AMERZCA-CORPORATE 33 BASELZNE TRUE VALUE HARDWARE 7776 BELL PUBLZSHZNG 555 8ENEFZELD, KZNGSLEY 4336 BENGAL RECYCLZNG, ZNCo 7788 BZGOS, BEVERLY 6153 80ARAH, CAPTORZA 6687 6OLKAe SHEZLA 6699 BOROERt MARG[E 7760 BOWRANt SUE 6369 BRODART BOOKS 1166 8RUNSNZCK DEER CREEK LANES 7659 BURBANK AZRPORT HZLTON 7775 BURGER KXNG #6163 552 8URK-BLACKSCHLEGERw ROSEANN 3584 8YTEL CORPCRATZON Z559 C A L B O 4803 C A P P 0 3942 CAL WESTERN TERMZTE PEST CONTROL 7776 CALZFORNZA COAST ADVERTZS2NG ALARM SERVZCE PROFESSZONAL SERVZCES BUSZNESS LZCENSE REFUND SUBSCRZPTZON RENEMAL SUBSCRZPTZON RAZNTENANCE SUPPLZES 8USZNESS LZCENSE REFUND VEHZCLE MAZNTENANCE/SUPPLZES PLAN CHECK REFUND OFFZCE EQUZPRENT SUBSCRZPTZDN RENEWAL ZNSTRUCTOR PAYMENT EQUZPRENT RENTAL OFFZCE SUPPLZES SOFTWARE MAZNTENANCE ASSESSPENT REFUND MONTHLY SERVZCE RECREATZON REFUND DEPOSZT REFUND DEPOSZT REFUND RAGAZZNES DEPOSZT REFUND ENGRAVED PLAQUE INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT ADMZNZSTRATZON FEES ADNZNZSTRATZON FEES RAZNTENANCE SUPPLZES RECREATZON REFUNO ZNSTRUCTOR PAYMENT PROFESSZONAL SERVZCES RECREATZON REFUNO ZNSTRUCTOR PAYMENT ZNSTRUCTOR PAYMENT ~NSTRUCTOR PRT DUSZNESS LZCENSE REFUND L~BRARY SUPPLIES ZNSTRUCTOR PAYMENT RISC RECREATZON REFUND ZNSTRUCTDR PRT SUBSCRZPT;ON CALDO ADR MEETZNG SENZNAR MONTHLY PEST CONTROL SERVZCE BUSZNESS LZCENSE REFUND 7989 CALZFORNZA STATE WATER RES CONTR 80 REZMBURSE FOR WORK BOOTS 7751 CARACHOe HZLDA PLAN CHECK FEES 7759 CANAVANt VZCTORZA BUSZNESS LZCENSE REFUND 7752 CARABALLO, OLZRPZA VOZDED CHECK 6127 CARRZLLOe RZCHARD REZRBURSE FOR SAFETY 800TS 7758 CATLZNi DEE ANN BUSZNESS LZCENSE REFUND ** CHECKI OVERLAP 103604 265,00 I 103605 29113,82 103606 19.97 103607 10.00 103608 19.50 t 103609 lt762.39 103610 132.97 # 103611 39.98 103612 11.50 t 103613 1,014.00 103614 31.71 103615 738,00 I 103616 180.08 e 103617 1,570.85 I 103618 322.71 103619 42.20 103620 166o27 103621 35.00 103622 Z3.40 103623 8.41 103624 ZO.O0 103625 18.25 t 103626 161.63 103627 60.00 103628 2e140.05 I 103629 291t527,50 103630 55.79 103631 7,06 103632 69°30 103633 52.30 103634 40.00 103635 267°00 103636 90.00 103637 9.00 103638 18.00 I 103639 7,640009 103640 279.00 103641 200000 103642 7.50 103643 Ze589,93 103644 115.84 103645 150.00 103646 90.00 I 103647 255.00 103648 60.00 103669 250,00 103650 200,00 103651 16,Z5 1036~2 350000 103653 115.29 103654 27,50 CZTY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA LZST OF NARRANTS FOR PERTOO: 02-14-96 C95/96) RUN DATE: 02/14196 PAGE: VENDOR NAME ZTEM DESCRSPTZON NARR NO MARR. ANT. 68 CENTRAL C]:T:I:ES SXGN SERVZCE 713 CNZCK'S SPORTZNG GOODS TNC 73 CZTRUS HOTORS ONTARZO, ZNCo 914 CLAREHONT CANERA 949 CLARKe KAREN 7747 COLBERT, RYAN 6238 COI~PLETE FOOD SERVZCE, ZNC. 1692 COMPUSERVEt ZNCORPORATEO 643 COMPUTERLAND 7177 CONAGRA, I:NC 633 CONSOLZDATED ELECTRZCAL OXST. 4863 CONTENPORARY BOOKS, ZNC. 1094 COOK/ARTHUR ZNC., BUSZNESS PROD- 1778 CREATZVE AUTO DESZGNS 85 CUCAHONGA CO NATER DZST 1756 CUZLLTER, STEPHANXE 6919 CUSTONLZNE, ZNC- 239 O & K CONCRETE CO 2512 D.A,ReE, ANERZCA 4488 DAGHDEVZRTAN, KATHY 284 DA]:SY MHEEL RZBBON CO, XNC 7779 OEE*S DEPOT 7780 DEL TACO #195 107 DETCO 7781 DZGZTAL EQUTPMENT CORP 7748 OXMENSZON GROUP 6922 DXNEEN, HARY 3484 DeC JOE'S 4205 DYNANZC GRAPHZCS, ZNC. 7782 E M J SPECZALTY TUeZNG 3364 EZGHTH AVENUE GRAPHZCS 511 EMBASSY SUZTES 7754 ENGLZSH, OENZSE 7783 ENR (ENGXNEERZNG NEbIS-RECORD) 3707 ESGZL CORPORATZON 229 EWZNG TRRZGATZON PRODUCTS 1829 FAXRCHZLD CONNUNZCATZONS 7753 FZCHTNER, PATRZCZA 125 FZRST AMERZCAN TZTLE ZNS. CO. 4895 FrRST TRUST 6879 FLEET GLASS 7786 FOQTHXLL ORANGE COAST CHEMI:CAL 7762 FORD, MARCELLA 7761 FOSKETT, SUSANA 7785 FOSS, SARAH F, 7763 FONLKES, THERZSA Z08Z FRANKLZN QUEST 3474 G & R REFRZGERATXON 7786 GENERAL MARBLE 3507 GOVERNZNG 4016 GRANT, RZTA · $ CNECgt OVERLAP MAZNTENANCE SUPPLZES e 103655 RECREATZON SUPPLIES I 103656 VEHZCLE NA[NTENANCE/SUPPLIES 103657 SUPPLZES/SERVZCES 103658 ZNSTRUCTOR PAYHENT 103659 RECREATZON REFUND 103660 GREEN hASTE PUBLZC NEETZNG 103661 HONTHLY SERVZCE 103662 CORPUTER MAZNTENANCE/$UPPLZES 103663 RECREATZON REFUND 103664 NAZNTENANCE SUPPLXES 103665 LZBRARY BOOKS 103666 OFFZCE SUPPLZES I 103667 RECREATZON REFUND 103668 MONTHLY NATER BZLLZNGS I 103669 BUSINESS LZCENSE REFUND 103670 MAZNTENANCE 103671 STREET HAXNTENANCE 103672 O,A.R.E. NATERZAL I 103673 ZNSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 103674 OFFZCE SUPPLZES I 103675 RECREATZON REFUND 103676 RECREATZON REFUND 103677 OFFXCE SUPPLZES I 103678 RECREATZON REFUND 103679 RECREATZON REFUND I 103680 XNSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 103681 MAXNTENANCE REPAZRS 103682 OFFZCE EQUZPMENT 103683 RECREATZON REFUND 103684 OFFZCE SUPPLZES I 103685 NATZONAL LEAGUE OF CZTZES HTG. 103686 DEPOSZT REFUND 103687 RECREATZON REFUND 103688 PLAN CHECK 103689 XRRXGATZON SUPPLZES e 103690 TELEPHONE SERVZCES I 103691 CLAZM FOR DANAGE OR ZNJURY 103692 PROPERTY PROFZLE 103693 PROFESSZONAL SERVZCES 103694 LABOR ~ SUPPLXES 103695 RECREATXON REFUND 103696 8USZNESS LZCENSE REFUND 103691 8USZNESS LZCENSE REFUND 103698 RECREATZON REFUND 103699 8USZNESS LXCENSE REFUND 103100 OFFZCE SUPPLXES t 103701 8USXNESS LXCENSE REFUNO 103702 RECREATXON REFUND 103703 SUBSCRXPTXON 103704 CCPOA REETXNG 103705 647.28 928040 8,12 86055 150015 46,50 21.00 10.00 1,319.94 9.00 36.00 15.97 427,93 18.90 982.76 30,00 477.32 256.18 1,174.91 60.75 281.29 15.00 23.00 102,31 136.55 lo250.00 90.00 80.00 52.50 49.06 333.60 71.50 32°00 74.00 641.94 196.13 3m941.51 20000 Z5.OO 1400197.26 175.49 6.22 27.50 22.50 Zl.O0 30.63 108.83 IS3.00 179.64 10.00 62,S0 CZTY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA LZST OF HARRANTS FOR PERZOO: 02-14-96 C95/963 RUN DATE: 02/14/96 PAGE: 3 VENDOR NAME ZTEM OESCRZPTZON NARR NO NARRo AMTo 691 GRAVES AUTONOTZVE SUPPLY 4921 GRAY CONSTRUCTZONe N. 4386 GREGORY, CHERZ 7757 GRZMSLEYe DEBORAH 7769 GROSS XVe OAKFORD W. 137 GTE CALZFORNZA 4926 GTE DZRECTORZES DZST. CDRPORATZON 7787 GUIDERA PROPERTZES 13791 HANCOCK FABRZCS 1466 13796 HARRZSe OENNIS 1246 HAVEN BUZLDZNG MATERZALS 2855 HAVEN MZNE F, LZQUOR CO,, 462 MCS-CUTLER STEEL CO,, 3336 HEZLZGe KELLY 4367 HENBERGER CO,,ZNC,e JOHN C,, 2069 HOTDEe DONALD L, 4724 HZ-NAY SAFETY, /:NC, 958 NTGGZNS, HARTZ 13789 HZGNLAND ESCROM SERVZCES ZNC. 437 HZNDERLZTER, de LLAMAS ~, ASSOCZATES 13806 HOONZKt RUTH 13788 HOFFZNGER ZNOUSTRZES 13798 HOPKZNSt LARZSSA 13796 MOUSE, LYNOA 2412 HOYTe RAYMOND 3436 HUNTe LUANNE 1962 NYDRO TEK SYSTENSe XNC,, 495 HYDRO-SCAPE PRODUCTS, ZNC 13786 ZN-N-OUT BURGER 523 92 ZNLANO VALLEY DAZLY 8ULLETI'N 2315 ZNLAND NHOLESALE NURSERY 2317 ZNNAC 13785 JACK 'rN THE BOX I 3152 612 JAESCHKE ZNC,e C,,R. 13787 JANE$ HARRES AUTO 609 KAMZNEe STEZNER i, UNGERER 13790 KAROLL'S COMPUTER SERVZCES 2611 KERRY CDNSULT/:NG GROUP 13803 KERSHNERe JUDY 4329 KZNGe PATRZCK 1218 KNOX 172 KOZLOV:ZCHe DEBBZE 339 LAMe JACK 13795 LAMBSEN, SONZA ,.269 LANONEZERe BETSY 321 LANOSCAPE NEST 4447 LASTZNG ZMPRESSZONS PRZNTZNG CO,, 869 LANSON PROOUCTSe ZNC. 512 LZNVZLLE CZVZL ENGZNEERS 4758 LZV'rNGSTONe TRACY 1..55 LONG'S DRUGS · ~ CHECK# OVERLAP MAZNTENANCE SUPPLZES 103706 SERVZCES 103707 ZNSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 103708 8USZNESS LZCENSE REFUNO 103709 BLOG S ELECTRZCAL PERNZTS 103710 MONTHLY TELEPHONE 8ZLLZNGS # 103711 TELEPHONE 103712 RECREATZON REFUND 103713 8USZNESS LZCENSE REFUND 103716 RECREATZON REFUND 103715 MAZNTENANCE SUPPLZES 103716 SUB-CO~MZTTEE MEETZNGS I 103717 EQUZPMENT HAZNTENANCE 103718 ZNSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 103719 NAZNTENANCE SUPPLZES I 103720 ZNSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 103721 HAZNTENANCE SUPPLZES 103122 CERT SUPPLZES 1037Z3 6USZNESS LZCENSE REFUND 103726 SALES TAX AUDZT SERVZCES I 103725 CLAZM SETTLEMENT 1037Z6 8USZNESS LZCENSE REFUNO 103727 RECREATZON REFUND 103728 RECREATZON REFUNO 103729 ZNSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 103730 ZNSTRUCTOR PMT 103131 EQUZPMENT MAZNTENANCE 103132 LANDSCAPE NAZNTENANCE SUPPLZES I 103733 BUSZNESS LZCENSE REFUNO 103136 SUBSCRZPTZONS 103735 HAZNTENANCE SUPPLZES 103736 MAZNTENANCE SUPPLZES 103737 8USZNESS LZCENSE REFUND 103738 VEHZCLE MAZNTENANCE 103739 6USZNESS LZCENSE REFUND 103740 PROFESSZONAL SERVZCES 103761 BUSZNESS LZCENSE REFUND 103762 PROFESSZONAL SERVZCES 103763 RECREATZON REFUND 103744 ZNSTRUCTOR PATMENT 103765 MAZNTENANCE SUPPLZES I 103746 XNSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 103747 LEAGUE MEETXNG 103748 OEPOSZT REFUND 103769 CASH ADVANCE 103750 LANDSCAPE HAZNTENANCE # 103751 MAZNTENANCE SUPPLZES 103752 MAZNTENANCE SUPPLZES 103753 TOPOGRAPHZCAL OESZGN SURVEY S 103756 MZLEAGE REZMBURSEMENT 103755 FZLM PROCESSZNG I 103756 25,82 le860,00 88,00 30,00 39,,50 28268,40 112,,51 500,,00 9,06 60°00 92.94 281,25 28.02 727.60 18502,,73 50.00 355,58 SO,O0 47.45 18776,,79 1e037,,88 19,,66 12.50 26,,00 19925°28 60,00 30.77 385,38 19,,07 23.00 34.80 267o31 22,99 79,,85 10.25 115.50 lZ.Sl 413.25 25,,00 45,00 273.17 18521,,00 50.00 200.00 67070 83e8Z7.71 105.60 156,0Z 6e773.00 37,,50 21,87 CZTY OF RANCNO CUCANQNGA LZST OF MARRANTS FOR PERZOO: 02-14-96 (95/963 RUN DATE: 02/14196 PAGE: 4 VENDOR NAME ZTEM DESCRZPTZON NARR NO NARR. ANT. 4550 LUTTERNAN CONSTRUCTZON 1062 M C X TELECONNUNXCATXDNS 1062 M C Z TELECONHUNZCATXONS 1062 M C Z TELECOHMUNZCATZONS 3525 M M 8 8USZNESS SYSTEMS 956 MAC DONALOe XAXN 4843 MACHADOe ELVZRA 549 NARZPOSA HORTZCULTURAL ENTeZNC. 72 HARK CHRZS, ZNC. 76 NARKMANeARCZYNSKZ,HANSDN,& KZNG 4701 MARSHALL, SYLVZA 13801 MARXt MZCHAEL 4694 MASCARENAS, SUSAN 13800 MASON, JOAN 3907 MASTER-SORT, ZNC. 4894 MAXHELL MASONRY 1025 NC NASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 13804 HCAROLE, JDYCE 2198 MZCHAELS STORES ZNC. e3019 13802 NZGLZZZZ, KATHRYN 3057 MZLL$, MARY 4374 NOBZLE STORAGE GROUP, ZNCo 3333 NOTT, SYLVZA IOZO MOUNTAZN VZEW GLASS & MZRROR 4573 N.ZeG.P. 2248 NAPA AUTO PARTS 13797 NARULA, CHRISTABELLE 2111 NATZONAL FZRE PROTECTZDN ASSOCo 3437 NATZONAL UNZFORM SERVICE 4899 NATZONNZDE PAPERS 433 NZXON-EGLZ EQUZPHENT 13805 NUGEN, LZMDA REMODEL CZTY'S SKYBOX TELEPHONE SERVZCES TELEPHONE SERVZCES TELEPHONE SERVZCES MONTHLY MAZNTENANCE SERVZCES ZNSTRUCTOR PAYMENT ZNSTRUCTOR PAYMENT <<< LANDSCAPE MA[NTENANCE VEHZCLE NAZNTENANCE SUPPLZES PROFESSZONAL SERVICES RECREATZON REFUND RECREATZON REFUND RECREATZON REFUND RECREATZON REFUND PRESORT MAXL SERVZCE$ REPAZRED BLOCK NALL NAZNTENANCE SUPPLZES RECREATZON REFUND RECREATZON SUPPLIES RECREATZON REFUND XNSTRUCTOR PAYHENT EQUZPMENT RENTAL ZNSTRUCTOR PAYMENT MAZNTENANCE SUPPLZES ANNUAL NEMBERSHZP VEHZCLE NAZNTENANCE RECREATZON REFUND HANDTOGKS UNZFORN SERVZCES SUPPLZES VEHXCLE NAXNTENANCE RECREATZON REFUND 523 OPFXCE DEPOT 365 OLD QUAKER PAZNT COMPANY 2306 OLZVZERe NZCHAEL 527 OLYNPZC STUOZOS, ZNC. 67 ON-CALL COMNUNZCATZONS 13793 ONO LABORATORZES 3964 ONTARIO ZCE SKATZNG CENTER 13792 ORANGE COAST REALTORS 1224 ORANGE COUNTY STRZP~NG SERVZCE,ZNC. STRZPZNG SERVZCES OFFZCE SUPPLZES MAZNTENANCE SUPPLZES REZMBURSEMENT ZNSTRUCTOR PAYMENT MONTHLY SERVZCES 6USZNESS L~CENSE REFUNO ~NSTRUCTOR PAYMENT BUS~NESS LZCENSE REFUND · e CHECK8 OVERLAP # 103757 987.35 103758 Z0.50 103759 914.40 103760 496.05 103761 113.22 103762 389.81 103763 60.00 13799 ORTZZ, SUSZE 235 OMEN ELECTRZC 874 PACHON, PAULA 8901 PALOMERA, GRACE 9078 PARTITZON SPECZALTZESt ZNC. 487 PATTON SALES CORP. 8854 PATLESS SHOESOURCE 16062 757 PEP BOYS RECREATZON REFUND MAZNTENANCE SUPPLIES RECREATZON REFUNDS COMM. SERVICES REFUND 8USZNESS REFUNDS MAZNTENANCE SUPPLZES BUSZNESS LZCENSE REFUNOS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 103764- 103764 e 103765 48,348.08 I 103766 49.44 103767 5,589.79 103768 151.20 I 103769 55.00 103770 61.02 103771 65.00 103772 205o16 103773 1,280.00 e 103774 58.56 103775 30.86 8 103776 241.98 103777 13.50 103778 97.50 103779 136.55 103780 81.00 103781 339.16 103782 135.00 8 103783 551,50 103784 14,00 103785 95.00 103786 30,1Z 103787 3e272.1 # 103788 261.98 103789 ZZ.5O 103790- 103790 · 103791 1e575.60 II 103792 514.99 103793 160.00 103794 19916°00 103795 253.03 103796 6.44 103797 307.20 103798 37.50 103799 19558.89 103800 30.00 I 103801 812,71 10380Z 54.61 103803 14.40 103804 52.65 103805 Z39.55 103806 5.00 103807 23.00 CZTY OF RANCHO CUCAHQNGA LZST OF VARRANTS FGR PERZOO: 02-14-96 C95/963 RUN DATE: 02/14/96 PAGE: 5 VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION NARR NO WARRo AMT. 1079 PHOTO HOUSE OF CALIFORNIA 9079 PZC N SAVE ~103 54Z PZP PRINTING 272 PITNEY BONES 255 POMA DXSTRZBUTZNG CO 2719 PONCHAUO, JANICE 9080 PRECZS~ON LANDSCAPE & TURF 4841 PRESTON, MICHAEL 4292 PRICE CLUB 9081 PRICE, KAREN 3286 PRINCIPAL HUTUAL 65 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 50 PUBLIC RISK HANAGEMENT ASSOC. 4440 PUTMAN, DILL 251 R & R AUTONOTZVE 1890 R ~ R LIGHTING 345 R.DoO. EQUIPMENT COMPANY 9081 RANXREZ, CAROL 228 RANCHO CUCA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 2600 RANCHO CUCANONGA FIRE DISTRICT 4130 RBM LOCK & KEY SERVICE 545 RED WING SHOE STORE 4887 REDLANDS CANERA 9083 RENDALLm GLENOA ZOZ3 RESPONSE ENVELOPE 276 RZVERSZOE BLUEPRINT 9065 RO, ROSA 9086 RONERO, ANZTA 3335 ROSE, CHR~STZE 4906 ROSS DISTRIBUTING CORPORATION, RON 2196 RUGG LUMBER COHPANY, INC. 4438 S C A C E 0 3958 SALVIATZ, HARTHA 1492 SAN BERN CO FLOOD CONTROL OEPT 214 SAN BERN CO SOLID HASTE MOMENT 261 SAN 6ERNAROZNO COUNTY 132 SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM CO, ZNC 9086 SCHAEFER, KIN 1105 SEAL FURNITURE & SYSTEMS ZNCo 9087 SECURITY DATA GROUP OF CALZF 3896 SENECHALe CAL 2655 $ERVZCE MASTER 6388 SHEELER, DEBORAH 2507 SZEBE ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS 351 SXGN SHOP. THE 3276 SINCLAIR PAZNT 692 SIR SPEEDY 1327 SHART ~ FINAL 317 SO CALZF EOZSON CO, 135 SO CALZF MUNICIPAL ATHLETIC FEO,ZNC ** CHECKI OVERLAP PHOTO SUPPLIES BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS RECREATION SUPPLZES POSTAGE METER RENTAL VEHICLE NAZNTENANCE ~ SUPPLIES INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS ZNSTRUCTOR PAYMENT RECREATION SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUNDS MEDZCALIDZSABZLITY INSURANCE MAZNTENANCE SUPPLIES MEMBERSHIP RENEHAL HANG COMPUTER SERVICE VEHICLE MAZNT,SUPPLZES&SERVZCE MAINTENANCE SERVICE/SUPPLIES MAZNT SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUNDS REIMBURSE GRANT FUNDS PLAN CHECK SERVICES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES SAFETT 800TS MISC. SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUNDS OFFICE SUPPLZES PRINTS RECREATION REFUNOS RECREATION REFUNDS ZNSTRUCTOR PAYMENT MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MAZNT SUPPLIES ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP DUES INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT INSPECTION FEE MONTHLY SERVICE PRINTING ~ MAIL SERVICES NAZNT SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUNOS OFFICE SUPPLZES BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT MAINTENANCE ZNSTRUCTZOR PAYMENT SERVZCE/SUPPLZES MAZNT SUPPLZES MAZNTENANCE SUPPLIES FAXES DAY CANP SUPPLIES HONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLINGS REGISTRATION 103808 5.24 103809 31.00 103810 64.87 103811 38.45 103812 886.19 103813 150.48 103816 20.02 103815 146.00 103816 85096 103817 55.00 103818 62,991068 103819 165038 103820 50000 103821 960,00 103822 693.66 103823 331,05 103824 318.23 103825 75.00 103 eZ6 4,128,Z 1 103827 291.50 103828 17.20 103829 102.91 103830 75.43 103831 20.00 103832 350.84 103833 188.54 103834 33,00 103835 27.50 103836 118,50 103837 863.30 103838 286.89 103839 400.00 103840 612000 103861 738.73 103842 6,248.18 103843 77,75 103844 321.10 103865 27,50 103846 69397.65 103847 78.69 10384.8 182.00 103869 563.71 103850 45,00 103851 1,270.09 103852 268.83 103853 570.65 103854 105.49 103855 115.34 103856 103857 729822.58 103858 140.00 103856 - CITY OF RANCHQ CUCANQNGA LIST OF MARRANTS FOR PERZQD: 02-16-96 (95/96) RUN DATE: 02/16/96 PAGE: 6 VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION NARR NO NARR. AMT. 9088 SOTO, OLZVIA 1432 SOUTHERN CALIFDRNXA EDISON 6192 SPAINeJR,WILLIAN V. 322 SPARKLETTS 750 SPECTALTY TYPEI~RTTER SERVICE 9089 SPENCERe CHARLES 4389 STEHNe JIM 9090 STRDNG-CARTER, SABRZNA 6733 SUNRISE FORD 336 SURVEYORS SERVTCE 9091 T C S A 836 TARGET SPECTALTY PRODUCTS 836 TARGET SPECTALTY PRODUCTS 4920 TARGETRONt iNC. 9092 TAYLORt ERICA 2718 TERRY, DONNA 6351 TOBTN, RENEE 9093 TODD*S ENTERPRISES 9095 TOTN, HR. RON 9094 TOHN & COUNTRY LIQUOR 6558 U.So GUARDS CO.t TNC. 350 U.S. POSTMASTER 4206 UNZQUE CREATIONS 9096 UNITED RETAIL ZNC. e737 9097 UNITED TEMPORARY SERVICES, INC. 4606 UPLAND TENNIS CLUB 376 URBAN LAND iNSTXTUTE 9098 VICTORIA ANZRAL HOSPITAL 3422 VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS 9099 Z360 478 9100 Z13 4577 9101 477 774 267 43Z0 2681 872 9102 509 9103 9104 371 VINCENT, DIANA VORTEX INDUSTRIES WARREN & COot CARL WARREN, MELBA WAXZE, KLEEN-LZNE CORP HELLS FARGO GUARD SERVICES HESSEL, TANZ WEST PUBLISHING CO WESTEK COMPUTER SERVICES, iNC NESTERN ROCK CO WZLCO SECURITY NILLZAN$, DZANE HITTER, JOANNE WRIGHT, LAURA XEROX CORPORATION YORBA LINDA PUBLIC LI8RARY YOUNG, CELESTE ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE RECREATION REFUNOS MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLS C.E. ReT. INSTRUCTOR MONTHLY SERVICE TYPENRZTER SERVICE RECREATZON REFUNDS iNSTRUCTOR PAYMENT RECREATION REFUNDS AUTO SERVICE & SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLZES MEMBERSHIP APPLICATION MAZNT SUPPLIES MAINT SUPPLZES VINDICATOR MAINTENANCE RECREATION REFUNDS INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT RECREATION REIMBURSEMENT BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS OEPOSZT REFUNOS BUSINESS LXCENSE REFUNOS SECURITY GUARD SERVICE POSTAGE LANDSCAPE NENSLETTER 1ST AIO K~TS 6USZNESS LICENSE REFUNOS BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT ANNUAL DUES BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNOS OFFICE SUPPLZES RECREATXON REFUNDS MAINT SERVICE & REPAIRS LIABILITY CLAIMS RECREATION REFUNDS NAINT SUPPLIES SECURITY GUARD SERVICES RECREATION REFUNDS PUBLICATIONS COMPUTER SERVICE ASPHALT & CONCRETE SECURITY SYSTEM LEASE CA LXBRARZES CONFERENCE iNSTRUCTOR PAYMENT RECREATION REFUNDS COPY MACHINE SUPPLIES/SERViCE SUBSCRIPTION-PUBLICATIONS RECREATION REFUNDS RECREATION SUPPLIES ** CHECK# OVERLAP 103859 46.20 103860- 103864 >)) I 103865 6,787.15 I 103866 412.50 103867 37.00 103868 90.00 103869 30.80 103870 120.00 103871 3.00 t 103872 330.20 It 103873 170.41 103874 25,00 103875 45.00 I 103876 1,350.11 103877 73,40 103878 20.00 103879 288075 103880 8Z,14 103881 125.38 103882 500.00 103883 57.15 103884 1,025.02 103885 85,00 I 103886 214.12 103887 23.00 103888 810.50 103889 689.60 103890 145.00 103891 30.00 I 103892 1,226.76 103893 ZO.OO 103894 168.66 I 103895 554.60 103896 26.00 RI 103897 2,715.93 103898 1,100.85 103899 15.00 ~l 103900 440.26 103901 137.38 I 103902 295.00 103903 60.00 103906 50.00 103905 257.60 103906 27.50 t 103907 49769.40 103908 95.70 103909 2O.OO I 103910 205.58 TOTAL 837,707.84 CZTY OF RANCHQ CUCAMONGA LZST OF MARRANTS FOR PERZOO: 02-21-96 C95/96) RUN DATE: 02/21/96 PAGE: 1 VENDOR NAME ZTEM DESCRZPTZON WARR NO MARR. ANT. 1081 BOLZN NAZNT. & JANZTOR%AL, JOHN 2958 UMPS ARE US ASSOCZATZON 2731 UN/:GLOBE REGENCY TRAVEL I A & A EQUZPNENT 211 A P Z ALARN SYSTEMS 7790 A88ONOANTE CATERZNG 2732 ABC LOCKSMZTH$ 1826 AZRTOUCH CELLULAR 4207 ALERT COMNUNZCATZONS CO. 4237 ALL DATA $ERVZCES 6401 ALTAZR GASES AND EGUZPHENT~ ZNC. 1430 ANERZCAN BUSZNESS FORMS 7791 ARMZENTZt ELZZABETM 1184 ASHBYe PATRZCZA 26 ASSOCIATED ENGZNEERS 2437 ASSOCIATED GROUP, THE 1135 AUTO SPEC~ALZSTS 4473 8 & D SPECZALTZES, ZNC. 4933 BAZLEY, HALLACE J. 803 BALDY VZEN PUBLZC/PRZVATE COALZTZON 7792 BARRY & ASSOCo 33 BASELZNE TRUE VALUE HARONARE 2067 BENDER & CO. ZNC., MATTHEM 6441 BEST BUY CO., ZNC. 1247 BLAKE PAPER CO°, ZNC. 1081 BOLZN NAZNT. ~ JANZTORZAL, JOHN 969 BOYD LUMBER 4369 8RODART BOOKS 4686 C J M~CROFZLN SERVZCES 3942 CAL MESTERN TERNZTE PEST CONTROL 7584 CALZFORNZA LZBRART ASSOCIATZON 861 CAREER TRACK SEHZNARS &877 CASHIER, OEPT OF PESTZDE REGULATZON 69 CHAFFEY JOZNT UNZON HZGH SCHOOL 488 CHEVRON U S A. ZNC 73 CZTRU$ MOTORS ONTARXO, ZNC° 74 CXTY RENTALS 4211 COAST RECREATZON, ZNCo 2648 COBB GROUP ZNC., THE 2470 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 2362 CON SEN COMPANY, ZNC. 4061 CONPETROL NANUFACTURZNG, ZNC° 2692 COHPUSERVE, ZNCORPORATEO 130 COMPUTER SERVZCE CO 643 COHPUTERLANO 633 CONSOLZDATEO ELECTRZCAL OZST. 633 CONSOLZOATED ELECTRZCAL OZ$To 4316 CORPORATE EXPRESS CHECK//OVERLAP JANZTORZAL SERVZCES UMP SERVZCES CONOEX NEETZNG VEHZCLE NAZNTENANCE/SUPPLZES ALARM SERVZCE RECREATZON REFUNDS MAZNTENANCE SUPPLZES CELLULAR PHONE BZLLZNGS ZNSTALLATZON/SERVZCE OFFZCE SUPPLZES EQUZPHENT RENTAL OFFZCE SUPPLZES RECREATZON REFUND REZMBURSENENT PROFESSZONAL SERVZCES MONTHLY MAZNTENANCE SERVZCE VEHZCLE HAZNTENANCE PROFESSZONAL SERVZCES PROFESSZONAL SERVZCES CLOUT HEETZNG RECREATZON REFUNO HAZNTENANCE SUPPLZES OFFZCE SUPPLZES RCNC EGUZPMENT RECREATZON SUPPLZE$ JANZTORZAL SERVZCES MAZNTENANCE SUPPLZE$ LZBRARY SUPPLZES PROFESSZONAL SERVICES HONTHLY PEST CONTROL SERVZCE HENBERSHZP DUES REGZSTRATZON AGRZCULTURAL PEST CNTL LZCENSE RENTAL - AUDZTORZUH R°C°H. So GASOLZNE CHARGES VEHICLE NAZNTENANCE/SUPPLZES EQUZPMENT RENTAL/SUPPLZES NAZNTENANCE SUPPLZES SUBSCRZPTZON RENEMAL VEHZCLE NAZNTENANCE SUPPLZES SERVZCE/REPAZRS HAZNTENANCE SUPPLZES MONTHLY SERVZCE SZGNAL MAZNTENANCE/SUPPLZES COHPUTER HAZNTENANCE/SUPPLZES NAZNTENANCE SUPPLZES MAZNTENANCE SUPPLZES OFFZCE SUPPLZES ((( 101950 <<< 103602 <<< 103912 1019491 17,983.00 103600 1036011 103910 1039111 2,639.05 103913 103914 241.08 103915 84.00 103916 435.00 103917 3,04Z.11 103918 358.98 103919 480.29 103920 5,058.86 103921 84°94 103922 1,208.60 103923 35.00 103924 10.84 103925 158o00 103926 1,813..31 103927 2,512.35 103928 4,970.88 103929 362.00 103930 72.00 103931 16o05 103932 171.11 103933 47.95 103934 21.03 103935 69°60 103936 5,717.00 103937 27`-12 103938 5,260.54 103939 116,10 103940 75.00 103941 75.00 103942 79,,00 103943 15.00 103944 1,000.00 103945 149.75 103946 203.85 103947 104,94 103948 56°49 103949 49°00 103950 9.31 103951 302.44 103952 45.00 1039~3 10.00 103954 4,274.00 103955 24f, 239.97 103956 5,494,,13 103957 56o5Z 103958 41,51 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF MARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 01-11-96 (951963 RUN DATE: 01/Z1/96 PAGE: Z VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION MARR NO MARRo ANTe 7793 CUCAMONGA 8 L M NACHZNE SVCe INC. 85 CUCAMONGA CO MATER OIST 355 OANIELS TIRE SERVICE 4603 OAPEER & ROSENBLIT 4932 DEANeS GREENS NURSERY 4366 DENCO 107 DETCO 4544 DICKe ERXC 839 DIETERICH INTERNATIONAL TRUCK 659 EGGHEAD SOFTMARE 3364 ETGHTH AVENUE GRAPHICS ZIZI FARR'S - RANCHO CUCAMONGA 3177 FEJERANe TIMOTHY 4736 FIFTH THIRD LEASING COHPANY 98 FORD PRINTING & MAILING. ZNC 1144 FRAME-ART 1081 FRANKLIN QUEST 3356 GARCIAe VIVIAN 7794 GAS GARDEN INC. 7795 GELVZN NZCROSYSTENSt ZNC. 4045 GLASS90AN 4376 GONTHZERe SPRING K, 3507 GOVERNXNG 4014 GRANTt RXTA 744 GREAT MESTERN SAVINGS 4913 GROLIER EDUCATIONAL CORP. 137 GTE CALIFORNIA 13809 HAPA-BRDMNe ZENZAOA 662 HCS-CUTLER STEEL CO, 3334 MEZLZGe KELLY 2069 HEYDEe DONALD Lo 13816 MILL, TERESA 4865 HZLLSZOE COMMUNITY CHURCH 3636 HOUSE OF RUTH 161 HDYT LUMBER CO.. S.He 2412 HOYTt RAYMOND 1962 HTDRO TEK SYSTEMSt ZNCe 103 Z C M A RETIREMENT TRUST-457 6188 Z 0 BURR 4256 ZBN CORPORATION 66 INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT 3736 INLAND ENPZRE SOCCER REFEREE A$SN. 1951 INLAND EMPIRE STAGESw LTO, 3885 INLAND LANNNDMER 907 INLAND MEDIATION BOARD 908 INLAND MEOZATZON BOARD ZZZ ZNLAND VALLEY DAZLY BULLETIN 4559 XNTERSOLV RTPe XNC. 175 JOBS AVAZLABLE CHECKRe OVERLAP RECREATION REFUNO HONTHLY WATER BZLLZNGS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE & SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES NUNSERr SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLZES EMPLOYEE OF THE MONTH VEHICLE MAINTENANCE OFFZCE SUPPLIES/EQUIPMENT OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES FIRE EXTINGUISHER SERVICE LEASE PAYMENT MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLZES PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT RECREATION REFUND RECREATION REFUND INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT SUBSCRIPTION CCPOA MEETING OEFERREO COHP LIBRARY SUPPLZES 103959 6,41 103960- 103964 Re 103965 98862ell Re 103966 423,58 103967 102e15 103966 14.55 103969 43.04 I 103970 31.79 Re 103971 75.00 Re 103971 271.01 Re 103973 3t626e87 Re 103974 330,79 Re 103975 61.77 103976 62.50 103977 25t293.08 103978 305o71 Re 103979 3Ze86 Re 103980 176e93 103981 59076 103982 15.99 103983 12.16 103984 87.50 103985 87.50 103986 10.00 103987 IZS,00 103988 5t306.00 103989 29128e38 103990- 103990 Re 103991 leOIZe26 103992 Z3eO0 t 103993 614.77 103994 330e47 103995 262.50 103996 ZOeO0 103997 19500.00 103998 633.36 Re 103999 54eZ9 104000 101.65 106001 30,77 I0400Z 19413.00 Re 106003 174.29 Re 104004 18451,17 t 106005 644,64 104006 11067o80 104007 78.00 106008 133.95 104009 10,00 Re 104010 19586,16 I 104011 19364.95 Re 104012 106013 614,7Z MONTHLY TELEPHONE BILLINGS BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT ZNSTRUCTOR PAYMENT RECREATION REFUND MONTHLY RENT 93/94 CDBG CONTRACT MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE DEFERRED COMP HAZNTENANCE SUPPLIES ADNZNZSTRATZON CLASS MAINTENANCE SUPPLZES NEN'S SOCCER PROGRAM TRANSPORTATION SERVZCES VEHICLE MAINTENANCE LANOLORO/TENANT DISPUTE LANOLORO/TENANT DISPUTE RESOL. AOVERTZSING MAZNTENANCE SUPPLIES ADVERTZSEMENTS CITY OF RANCNO CUCANONGA LIST OF MARRANTS FOR PERZOO: 02-21-96 (95196) RUN DATE: 02121/96 PAGE: 3 VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION MARR NO NARR, ANTe 1218 KNOX 13815 KURNZAe HONEY 13811 LeO, PRODUCTIONS 195 LANCEt SOLL F, LUNGHARD 321 LANDSCAPE NEST 869 LANSON PROOUCTS, INC. 197 LEAGUE OF CALXFORNIA CITIES 2358 LEAGUE OF CALZFORN3EA C~TZES 3201 LUPE & JOHNNY'S BODY &PAXNT SHOP 13808 MAGNZSON & MOENw INC. 76 MARKNANtARCZYNSKZeHANSON,~ KXNG 6763 MARKS CABLEVXSXON 13816 NATIOSSZAN, NERIOA 2555 MC ALLISTER DESIGN 13812 MCLS - MCLS HQ 749 MIJAC ALAR~ COMPANY 13807 MINOLTA BUS. SYSTEMS, INC. 403 MORTON COATINGS, INC. - BAUER 1020 MOUNTAIN VZEN GLASS & MIRROR 84Z MOUNTAIN VIEN SHALL END. REPAIR 3825 NcTRANS CENTER 2248 NAPA AUTO PARTS 3437 NATXONAL UNXFORM SERVXCE 309 O C 8 REPROGRAPHXCS, XNC 523 OFFICE DEPOT 13810 OLAN MILLS, INC. 13813 OLD, PATRICZA 3632 OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION 235 OMEN ELECTRIC 338 PACIFIC EQUXPT C XRRXGATXONt XNC. 818 PARAGON 8UXLOXNG PRODUCTS INC. 3837 PARNELLt TXM 3173 PELTZER, TAMMY 9125 PERTUSANTI BROS LANDSCAPE 4556 PZTASSIt PETER Je 1316 PRECINT REPORTER 9126 PRINCESS RESORT 9105 PROPERTIES UNLINITEO 65 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 4420 QUICK CRETE PROOUCTS 9106 QUZCKe PAT 618 R M A GROUP 9108 RAGON, NANCY 266 RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY 264 RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY 714 RAM BUSINESS SYSTEMS 2&O0 RANCHO CUCAHDNGA FIRE DISTRICT 9107 RANGELe ELD~SE 9109 RZNGe PAMELA 9110 RONOP, LXNDA MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUND DEPOSIT REFUND AUDIT SERVICES LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES ANNUAL DUES HEETZNG REGISTRATION MAINTENANCE BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNO <(( 104024 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADVERTISING RECREATION REFUND DESZGN OF BUSINESS CAROS REGZSTRATZDN ALARM SERVICES BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MISC VEHICLE MAINTENANCE UNIFORM SERVICES METROLINK OFFICE SUPPLIES BUSXNESS LICENSE REFUND RECREATZON REFUND OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION MAZNTENANCE SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES CONCRETE SUPPLIES CERT INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT RECREATION SUPPLIES BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS ARCHITECTURAL PROJECT ADVERTISEMENT LEAGUE OF CALIF CITIES CONF 6USZNESS LICENSE REFUNDS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS SOIL TESTING SERVICES RECREATION REFUNDS RECREATION SUPPLIES RECREATION SUPPLIES PRINTER SUPPLIES PLAN CHECK SERVICES RECREATION REFUNDS RECREATION REFUNDS RECREATION REFUNDS CHECKI OVERLAP 106014 63,70 106015 25,00 104016 500,00 106017 612,50 104018 5,281.68 106019 19237,34 104020 12,266,00 104021 220.00 104022 20.24 106023 90,00 106024 >)) 104025 Z0,348.54 104026 39,08 1040Z7 20,00 104028 657.28 104029 7,50 104030 ITS06.00 106031 26.38 104032 565.69 106033 153,05 106036 366,33 104035 230,00 104036 568.96 104037 366.36 106038 362.,20 106039 255°54 106060 134,.98 104061 48.00 104042 697.86 104043 2,564.65 104044 34.89 104045 116e92 104046 87,50 104047 14.40 104048 28.60 10604.9 17,455.76 104050 102,00 104051 240.88 104052 IZ.O0 106 053 39°74 104054 4,051.40 106055 10,50 104056 l, 519,50 104057 30,00 104058 19,98 106059 10.80 106060 106.61 104061 53,00 104062 130,.00 104063 40,00 104066 20.80 CZTY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA LZST OF NARRANTS FOR PERZOO: 02-21-96 (95/963 RUN OATE: 02/21/96 PAGE: 6 VENDOR NAME ZTEM OESCRZPTZDN NARR NO NARR. ANT. 9111 ROSSt DEBRA 9112 RUPPt ROD 9113 SoCo DONUTS 3260 SAN ANTONIO COMMUNITY HOSPZTAL 303 SAN BERNAROZNG COUNTY 3313 SARTOR*S MODZLE HOMEr PETE 3313 SARTOR'S MOOZLE NONE, PETE 3313 SARTOR*S NOMZLE HOMEr PETE 9065 SCHMARTZe CHERYL 9114 SEVEN-UP (7-UP) 80TTLING COMPANY 2507 SIEBE ENVZRONMENTAL CONTROLS 351 SIGN SHDPt THE 9115 SZZZLER FANZLY STEA~ HOUSE 1567 9116 SKYLINE VENTURE 1327 SMART g FZNAL 9117 SMZTH~ ALAN Eo 317 SO CALIF EDISON 135 SO CALZF MUNICZPAL ATHLETZC FEDwZNC 9118 SO. CAL SMALL 8US CTRo 532 SPAGNOLO, SAN 6192 SPA[NwJRfNILLZAM 750 SPECZALTY TYPENRZTER SERVICE 6733 SUNRISE FORO 1659 SYMPRO ZNC 9119 T-Z4 SHADING PRODUCTSt XNC. 6114 TAYLOR-OUNN 8734 TROPICAL FZSH FOODS 4558 U.S. GUAROS CO,s ZNC. 350 U.S. POSTMASTER 9127 UNGAe OFA 9121 VASQUEZw MAYA 6714 VPD/PVT 9122 MALMER TOOLING & EXPAC,INC. &78 MARREN ~ CO., CARL 213 MAXIEt KLEEN-LZNE CORP 6577 MELLS FARGO GUARD SERVICES 6331 NEST ENO TMCA 9123 NOLDf LOU 9124 ZALAKOMSKI, MARY 371 ZEE NEDICAL SERVZCE 4377 ZOUR, DRETT RECREATZON REFUNDS RECREATZON REFUNDS 6USZNESS LICENSE REFUNDS EMPLOYEE PHYSICALS ENGZNEERZNG OFFZCE SUPPLIES REHAB PROGRAM REHAD FROGRAN REHAB PROGRAM RECREATZON REFUNOS BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS SERVZCE/SUPPLIES MAZNT SUPPLZES BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS UNZFOR~ APPLZCATION REFUND OAT CAMP SUPPLIES BUSINESS LZCENSE REFUNDS MONTHLY ELECTRZC 81LLINGS REGZSTRATION BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNOS CERT INSTRUCTOR CoEoRoTo INSTRUCTOR TYPENRITER SERVZCE AUTO SERVICE & SUPPLXES ANNUAL MAINTENANCE PORTFOLIO BUSZNESS LICENSE REFUNOS ALARM SERVICE RECREATION REFUNDS SECURZTY GUARO SERVICE POSTAGE LANOSCAPE NENSLETTER RECREATION REFUNOS RECREATION REFUNDS LZBRARY SUPPLZES 6USZNESS LICENSE REFUNOS LZABILZTY CLAIMS MAZNT SUPPLIES SECURZTY GUARD SERVICES FZLES DRYLY REVIEN RECREATION REFUNOS RECREATION REFUNDS RECREATION SUPPLZES CERT INSTRUCTOR CHECKI OVERLAP 106065 7.59 104066 30.00 104067 22o16 104068 2t110.00 104069 9.70 106070 384,50 106071 810.00 106072 695.00 106073 22.50 104076 8.15 104075 118590,26 104076 le010.00 104077 66.00 106078 195o20 106079 20,37 104080 7,00 104081 239553050 106082 16o00 104083 Z6.20 104086 87.50 104085 212o50 104086 192,96 104087 26.96 104088 leZ62e16 104089 16o63 104090 576°29 106091 9,06 106092 993.26 106093 5~600.00 106094 80.00 106095 60°00 104096 96°37 106097 26.97 106098 188.60 106099 239.55 104100 2,211.56 104101 620.70 lOSlOZ 35.00 104103 15,00 106104 28,72 104105 87,50 TOTAL 281,503,10 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: March 5, 1996 Mayor and Members of City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager APPROVE USAGE OF EPICENTER FOR DARE BASEBALL CLINIC RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that City Council approve, by minute action, the usage of the Epicenter on April 21, 1996 for a DARE fired raiser (Baseball Clinic). BACKGROUND The City has been requested by the Rotary Club to co- sponsor the third annual DARE BASEBALL CLINIC. The Baseball Clinic is schedule for April 21, 1996. The Clinic will start at 8:30 a.m. and end by 10:30 a.m., with the suggested participation cost per child at $28.00. The first two hundred applicants ranging in ages between eight and twelve years old will be included in this year's program. Net receipts will be donated to the DARE program. Rancho Cucamonga's Police Department and Inland Valley Basebail will also be sponsors of this event. R~spectfull~ ~lwood Deputy City Manager Attachments 3rd Annual Date: Sunday, April 2 l, 1996 Time: 8:00 - 8:30 a.m. (Regist. ration/Check-in) . 8:30 - 10:30 p.m. (Clinics) Place: Epicenter Stadium 8408 Rochester, Rancho Cucamonga Cost: $28 /per child (for kids 8 to 12 years old) Special Guest Steve Yeager, former Dodger Co-Spollsors Rancho Cucamonga Quakes, Rancho Cucamonga Rotary Club, City of Rancho Cucamonga and Rancho Cucarnonga Police Department The Quakes players will teach Clinics in fielding, bunting, hitting and pitching. (Each child must bring their own glove. No cleats allowed!) Tommy Davis, former Dodger 1996 Quakes Team Members Quakes Mascot Tremor Great prizes will be railled away! All funds raised will be donated to the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department's D.A.R.E. Progranl!! Space Limited To The I st 200 Kids To Sign-up! (Please detach and mail registration arid release forms ~o address belo~v.) Registration Child's Name: Address: Phone: PARENT/GUARDIAN MUST SIGN ATTACHED RELEASE FORM. CHILD MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY AN ADULT. Make all checks pcajable to: R.C. Rotary Club P.O. Box 1646 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-1646 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: March 5, 1996 Mayor and Members of City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager Approve Donation of Work Vest to the Youth Accountability Program RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that City Council approve by minute action, the donation of twenty work vests on a one time basis to the Youth Accountability Program within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The City has been asked to assist the Youth Accountability Program by donating twenty work vests on a one time basis to the program. With the understanding that this is a one time donation, staff believes that the financial impact is minimum. ~rry B. FulwooP'sp~I sYub~fri~tted'~~ Deputy City Manager CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 5, 1996 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Robert C. Dominguez, Administrative Services Manager BY: Joan Kruse, Purchasing Agent SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION REVISING DEFINITION OF FIXED ASSETS Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached resolution redefining fixed assets. Background Since 1987 with the adoption of Ordinance 328, the City' s Purchasing Manual has had little change. The definition of a "fixed asset" establishes anything with an original cost of $500 to be tagged and maintained as capital outlay. Over the years prices have increased for most commodities adding to the fixed asset list many items which formerly, because of cost, would not qualify as a fixed asset. This becomes increasingly burdensome. The attached resolution maintains the basic definition of tangibility, useful life of greater than one year, but increases the purchase price to $1,000. The policy adds high risk/controlled items for better accountability. The City Auditor has reviewed and recommended the modification. Respectfully submitted, Adminstrative Services Director jak Attach. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTABLISHING A NEW DEFINITION OF FIXED ASSETS WHEREAS, On November 4, 1987, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Califomia, adopted Ordinance No. 328, thereby adding Chapter 3.08 to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code pertaining to purchasing; and WHEREAS, policies and procedures have been established through this adoption. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia, as follows: Section 1. The above recitals are all true and correct. Section 2. For the purpose of maintaining accountability for specific City assets in Section 14.10 of the Purchasing Manual, this Council does hereby adopt the following revised definition: POLICY Under generally accepted fixed asset accountability requirements there are three types of equipment as defined below: 1 ) capital outlay items; 2) high risk items, and 3) controlled equipment. PROCEDURE Capital outlay is an expenditure for the acquisition of equipment, furniture or City personal property with an original cost of $1,000 or more, or that is of a "relatively permanent" nature. The definition of fixed assets (capital expenditure) 1. Tangible in nature; 2. Value of $1,000.00 or more; 3. Useful life greater than one year; 4. High risk/controlled equipment. Those items of $1,000.00 or more are considered capital outlay expenditures. /S Because the purchase of a capital item can be made from many fund accounts, please check with the Finance Division for the proper expenditure account number prior to issuance of a purchase requisition. Types of costs to be included in the original cost are: 1. Original unit price; 2. Freight or other carriage charges; 3. Sales, use and transportation taxes; 4. Installation costs. Examples of some types of capital outlay items are: 1. Office equipment; 2. Office furniture; 3. Automotive shop equipment; 4. Tools and construction equipment; 5. Communications equipment; 6. Motor vehicles; 7. Etc. Items not meeting any of the above criteria will be considered to be a maintenance and support item. For further information regarding fixed assets, please refer to Finance Division Procedures. Controlled equipment constitutes those items which by their value, nature and variety of uses should be specifically accounted for and inventoried periodically. Examples of such items include cameras, calculators, small office equipment and/or furniture, small tools and/or construction equipment, with an individual cost ranging from $50 to $1,000. Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this __ day of__, 1996. AYES: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 5, 1996 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Robert C. Dominguez, Administrative Services Manager BY: Joan Kruse, Purchasing Agent SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO DECLARE SURPLUS CITY-OWNED VAN RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve as surplus a City-owned van (No. 214) and authorize its donation to the Steelworker Old Timers Foundation. BACKGROUND The City purchasing procedure identifies two major categories of surplus property; materials and supplies, and capital equipment. It has been the policy of the City that the City Council provide authorization to the Purchasing Agent to dispose of City property by declaring such items surplus. Methods of disposition can be transfer to another department, trade-in, sale by bid or auction, sale as scrap, donation, or simply trashing. With replacement intended this fiscal year for a 1989 Chevrolet Astro Van, Unit #214, VIN No. 1GNDM 1Z 1KB 1624, Asset No. 0976, it is recommended that this van be donated to assist in the Steelworker Old Timers Foundation, "Meals on Wheels" program. This non-profit service works out of the Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhood Center to provide meals to elderly and incapac- itated shut-ins within our community. It is being stipulated that with the transfer, the Oldtimers agree that its use would be exclusively for Rancho Cucamonga. The van which is in serviceable condition, along with other replacement vehicles, would normally be sold at auction. In this instance, the van can provide much greater service as part of the Meals on Wheels program by replacing the dilapidated one currently in use by this organization. Responsibility for liability, maintenance and fuel will be transferred entirely to the Steelworker Old Timers Foundation with title to the vehicle. Res ectfu submiRed, Director CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: March 5, 1996 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Gary Varney, Street/Storm Drain Maintenance Superintendent AUTHORIZATION TO PURCHASE EIGHT 1/2-TON S-10 PICK-UP TRUCKS FROM ROTOLO CHEVROLET OF FONTANA, CALIFORNIA, THROUGH A PIGGY- BACK/COOPERATIVE PURCHASE WITH THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA. FUNDING FOR FOUR OF THE PICK-UP TRUCKS WILL BE FROM INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES ACCOUNT NO. 72-4225-7045 AND FOUR ARE TO BE FUNDED FROM NINE DIFFERENT ACCOUNTS FOR A TOTAL OF $140,000.00. RECO1VIMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council authorize the purchase of eight 1/2-ton Chevrolet S-10 pick-up trucks from Rotolo Chevrolet of Fontana, California, through a piggy-back/cooperative purchase with the County of San Bernardino. Funding for four of the trucks will be from Account No. 72-4225-7045 and the remaining will be funded from a total of nine accounts as follows: 40-4130-7045, 41-4130-7045, 43-4130- 7045, 45-4130-7045, 09-4637-7045, 72-4225-7045, 05-4150-7045, 01-4647-7045, and 01-4245-7045 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Of the new vehicleS, four are replacements for current vehicles which have exceeded their service life and four are new purchases included in the Fiscal Year 1995/96 budget. The trucks and asset numbers for replacement are as follows: Truck 226 (Asset #0007) Truck 230 (Asset #0020) Truck 323 (Asset #0589) Truck 501 (Asset #0583 On December 18, 1995, the City requested proposals from 45 companies for the purchase of eight vehicles with options. The new trucks are for the Facility Maintenance Division. The lowest responsible bidder was not compliant to the specifications and staff has since negotiated a piggy-back/cooperative purchase with the County of San Bemardino. Respectfull ubmitted, " City Engineer . WJO:GV/jfs CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: March 5, 1996 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Gary Varney, Street/Storm Drain Maintenance Superintendent APPROVAL TO PURCHASE SIX FORD F-250 PICK-UP TRUCKS AND ONE CARGO VAN FROM FAIRVIEW FORD SALES, INC. OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AS THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER IN THE AMOUNT OF $185,490.86 TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NO. 72-4225-7045. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council authorize the purchase of six Ford F-250 pick-ups and one cargo van from Fairview Ford Sales, Inc., in San Bernardino as the lowest responsible bidder. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Of the new vehicles, six are replacements for current vehicles which have exceeded their service life and one is a new purchase in the Fiscal Year 1995/96 budget. The trucks and asset numbers for replacement are as follows: Truck 521 (Asset #0027) Truck 614 (Asset #0045) Truck 619 (Asset #0762) Truck 617 (Asset #0580) Truck 523 (Asset #0044) Truck 613 (Asset #0024) On December 18, 1995, the City requested proposals from 45 companies for the replacement of five vehicles. One cargo van is for the Facilities Maintenance Division, three full size pick-up trucks are for the SWeets Maintenance Division, and three (full size pick-up trucks) are for the Parks Maintenance Division. On January 16, 1996, the ten proposals that were received were opened. Three were "no bids," three were companies bidding only on the full-size pick-up trucks, and four companies bid specifically on the 4 x 2 trucks. The following is the successful low bidder who met all requirements of the specifications and is compliant by meeting or exceeding the City's specifications for performance, safety, and equipment standards. · Fairview Ford Sales, Inc. of San Bernardino, will provide six Ford F-250's and one cargo van. City Engineer k,~WJO:GV/jfs CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 5, 1995 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer By: Linda Beek, Jr. Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT DECLARATION AND AWARD AND AUTHORIZATION FOR EXECUTION OF CONTRACT FOR NORTHEAST PARK AND EAST AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve Environmental Assessment Declaration, award and authorize for execution the contract for Northeast Park and East Avenue Street Improvements, to the lowest responsive bidder. The park to be funded i?om Account Nos. 47-4130-9528, 27-4532-8924, 20-4532-8924 and 84-8532-8924. The resurfacing of East Avenue to be funded from Account No. 10-4637-9507. The unpaved sectior~ of East Avenue to be funded from Air Quality Improvement Grant. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Pursuant to law, an environmental assessment was undertaken within the limits of the park site. All findings were negative. Also, per previous Council action, bids were solicited and a bid date of March 5, 1996, was set. To avoid any delay in this project a bid summary and announcement of the lowest responsive bidder will be submitted to Council prior to the Council meeting. The Engineer's estimate was $1,400,000.00. Respectfully submitted, William J O'Neil City Engineer WJO:LB :dlw Attachments CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM PART I - INITIAL STUDY The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City policies, ordinances, and guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full: INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. Please note that it is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the application is complete at the time of submittal; City staff will not be available to perform work required to provide missing information. General Information Application Number for the project to which this form pertains: Project Title: Northeast Park Name & Address of project owner(s): City of Rancho Cucamonga. P. O. Box 807. Rancho Cucamonga. CA 91729 Contact Person & Address: Lucinda E. Hackett. Associate Engineer. City of Rancho Cucamonga Telephone Number: (909) 477-2740 extension 2340 Name & Address of person preparing this form (if different from above): Same as above Telephone Number: Same as above PROJECT INFORMATION & DESCRIPTION Information indicated by asterisk (*) is not required of non-construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff. *1) Provide a full scale (8 ¼ x 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the project site, and indicate the site boundaries. 2) Provide a set of color photographs which show representative views into the site from the north, south, east and west; views into and from the site from the primary access points which serve the site; and representative views of significant features from the site. Include a map showing location of each photograph. -1- 3) Project Location (describe): Site is located on East Avenue north of Summit Avenue in Rancho Cucamonga, San Bemardino County, California. More specifically located at 5939 East Avenue. 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers (attach additional sheet if necessary): APN 225-131 ~22 *5) Gross Site Area (ac/sq. Ft.): 18.02 acres *6) Net Site Area (total site size minus area of public streets & proposed dedications): 10 acres 7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the project site (attach additional sheet if necessary): None 8) Include a description of all permits which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies in order to fully implement the project: 9) Building Pennits from the Building and Safety Division. Encroachment Permit from Engineering Division and Tree Removal Permits from the Planning Division of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Describe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the project including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on site (including age and condition) and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of significant features described. In addition, site all sources of information (i.e., geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and archeological surveys, traffic studies): The Northeast Park project site is located on a 18 acre parcel of which approximately 12 acres will be developed with the first phase of the park. The project site is along East Avenue in Rancho Cucamonga, San Bemardino County. On-site elevation is about 1520 feet above sea level. The site is gently sloping toward south and southeast. although highly rocky soil contributes much in the way ofmicrotopography. The site was a citrus orchard that has now been cleared. There are existing windrows of eucalyptus trees that run along the northeast and the easterly property line and through the center of the propety. There is an existing masonary flood wall along the southerly property line with a V-ditch adjacent to it that was constructed by the school which is south of the project site. -2- 10) Describe the known cultural and/or historical aspects of the site. Site all sources of information (books, published reports and oral history): The existing eucalyptus windrows of are historical importance to the Etiwanda area and for the most part will be preserved as part of the park project. Describe any noise sources and their levels that now affect the site (aircraft, roadway noise, etc.) And how they will affect proposed uses: There is an existing unpaved road that will be paved with the project and will not have any noise level affects on the project. 12) Describe the proposed project in detail. This should provide an adequate description of the site in tennis of ultimate use which will result from the proposed project. Indicate if there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment. Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary: Park improvements include tot lot, picnic area with shade structure, two football/soccer fields, passive open space area. multi-purpose trail. restrooms. security lighting and a parking lot. The frontage improvements along East Avenue include A.C. paving, curb and gutter. street lights and sidewalk. Landscaping of the parkway will be blended in with the landscaping of the park. The landscaping will include the planting of trees, shrubs. ground cover and tuff throughout the site. irrigation and controllers. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.) And scale of development (height, frontage, setback rear yard, etc.): The property to the south is Summit Intermediate School. to the east is residential and orchard. To the noah is vacant and zoned residential. to the east is vacant land which is owned by the City of Rancho Cucamonga and is aluvial sage scrub area. 14) Will the proposed project change the pattern, scale or character of the surrounding general area of the project? This park is part of the Etiwanda Specific Plan and is being constructed adjacent to an existing -3- 15) middle school. so no it would not change the character of the surrounding area. Indicate the type of short-term and long-term noise to be generated, including source and amount. How will these noise levels affect adjacent properties and on-site uses. What methods of sound proofing are proposed? Short-term noise would be generated during the construction phase. Long-term would be from children playing and organized sports i.e. football or soccer games. These noise levels would not affect adjacent property since it is a school. Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees: Eight (8) trees from the eucalyptus windrows are being removed and fourteen (14)-15 gallon eucalyptus "Red Gum" trees are being planted to replace them. 17) Indicate and bodies of water (including domestic water supplies) into which the site drains: Etiwanda Creek which is an unimproved flood control facility. 18) Indicate expected amount of water usage. (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification, please contact the Cucamonga County Water District at 987-259 I. a. Residential (gal/day b. Comercial/Inc. (gal/day/ac c. Landscape/Park 180 gpm 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal. Septic Tank X Peak use (gal/day) Peak use (gal/min/ac) Sewer. If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests. If discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation: (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification, please contact the Cucamonga County Water District at 987-2591. RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS 20) Number of residential units: Detached (indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size: -4- Attached (indicate whether units are rental or for sale units): 21) Anticipated range of sale prices and/or rents: Sale Price(s) $ Rent (.per month) $ 22) Specify number of bedrooms by unit type: 23) Indicate anticipated household size by unit type: 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who will be resideing within the project: Contact the appropriate School Districts as shown in Attachment B: a. Elementary: b. Junior High: c. Senior High: COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS · 25) Describe type of use(s) and major funciton(s) of commercial, industrial or institutional uses: -5- 26) Total floor area of commercial, industrial, or institutional uses by type: 27) Indicate hours of operation: 28) Number of employees: Total: Maximum Shift: Time of Maximum Shift: 29) Provide breakdown of anticipated job classifications, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an indication of the rate of hire for each classification (attach additional sheet if necessary): 30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside in the City: ,31) For commercial and industrial uses only, ilndicate the source, type and amount of air pollution emissions. (Data should be verified through the South Coast Air Quality Management District, at (818) 572-6283): -6- ALL ~) PROJECTS Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies serving the project been contacted to determine their ability to provide adequate service to the proposed project? If so, please indicate their response. Yes. Edison is preparing a plan to provide service to the park and proposed street lights. Cucamonga County Water District has been contacted. There is an existing water main in the street fronting the park and they will be installing a 4" Water Service and a 1" Water Service 33) In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials? Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include, but are not limited to PCB's; radioactive substances; pesticides and herbicides; fuel, oils, solvents, and other flammable liquids and gases. Also, note underground storage of any of the above. Please list the materials and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, if known. None know 34) Will the proposed project involve the temporary or long-term use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials, including but not limited to those examples listed above? If yes, provide an inventory of all such materials to be used and proposed method of disposal. The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans. No DATE: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate evalluation of this project to the best of my ability, that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Title: ., ,,./ ~, ~ -7- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PART II - INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST I. BACKGROUND 1. Project File #/Name: Northeast Park 2. Related File(s) N/A 3. Applicant: City of Rancho Cucamonga 4. Project Description: 12 acre Community Park that will consist of a tot lot. picnic areas. two soccer/football fields without lighting. an open space passive area, multi purpose trail and a parking lot. 5. Project Accepted as Complete (date): ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Pursuant to Section 15063 of the Califomia Environmental quality Act Guidelines, explanation of the potential impacts identified as "Yes" or Maybe" answers are required on attached sheets. An explanation shall also be provided in each instance where a potentially significant effect has been determined not to be significant and is marked "No." YES MAYBE NO 1. EARTH. Will the proposal result in: e, Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic structure? Disruptions, displacements, compaction or over covering of the soil? Change in topography or ground surface relief features? The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? X X X X X X X Page 2 YES MAYBE NO 2. AIR. Will the proposal result in: Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? The creation of objectionable odors: Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? X X X 3. WATER. Will the proposal result in: a, g. Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runof~. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? Change in the amount of surface water in any body? Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interceptions of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? X X X X X X X X X X 4. PLANT LIFE. Will the proposal result in: a, b, c, Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops and aquatic plants)? Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? Introduction of new species of plant into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X X Page 3 YES MAYBE NO ANIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal result in: a, Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species Of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic Plants)7 Reduction of the number of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? 6. NOISE. Will the proposal result in: Increase in existing noise levels? Exposure of people to severe noise levels? LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the proposal: X a. Produce new light and glare? LAND USE:. Will the proposal result in? Substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? NATURAL RESOURCES. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? 10. RISK OF UPSET. Will the proposal involve: a, A risk of an explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset condition? Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? 11. POPULATION. Will the proposal: a, Alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? X X X X X X X X X Page 4 YES MAYBE NO 12. HOUSING. Will the proposal: a4 Affect existing housing or create a demand for additional housing? X 13. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Will the proposal result in: e, Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? X Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? X Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? X Alterations to water-borne, rail, or air traffic? Increases in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? X X X 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas? Fire protection? Police protection? Schools? Parks or other recreational facilities? Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? Other govemmental services? X X X X X X 15. ENERGY. Will the proposal result in: a, Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? __ X X 16. UTILITIES and SERVICE SYSTEMS. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities? a4 Power or natural Ggas? Communications systems? X X Page 5 YES MAYBE NO C, Water? Sewer or septic tanks? Waste water facilities? Solid waste disposal? X X 17. HUMAN HEALTH. Will the proposal result in: a, Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? Exposure of people to potential health hazards? X X 18. AESTHETICS. Will the proposal result in: a. The obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public? b. Creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? X X 19. RECREATION. Will the proposal result in: a, Impact upon the quality of existing recreational opportunities?__ Restrict the religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? X X 20. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Will the proposal: Result in the alteration of, or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? Result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure, or object? Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? X X X 21. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. Potential to degrade: Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal Page 6 III. or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Short-term: Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the advantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time. Long-term impacts will endure well into the future). Cumulative: Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two of more separate resources where the impact on each impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of these impacts on the environment is significant.) Substantial adverse: Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (Attach additional sheets with narrative description of the environmental impacts.) X X X X IV V DISCUSSION OF LAND USE IMPACTS. (An examination of whether the project would be consistent with existing zoning, plans, and other applicable land use controls.) .DETERMINATION (To be completed by the Lead Agency.) On the basis of this initial evaluation: X I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENT IMPACT REPORT is required. I find the proposed project CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT per Article 19, Class 1C, Section 15 3 0 1 of the California Environmental Quality Act. Page 7 Signature ~,-\ ~e Print Name For City of Rancho Cucamonga Date 1.b. 12 acres will be graded to accommodate 2 football soccer fields and a parking lot. The entire site will continue to drain to the southeast comer of the property as it currently does. The parking lot will not be paved to leave the site as pervious as possible. No further mitigation measures are required. 3.b. As stated in 1 .b the park site drainage is remaining basically the same and the parking lot will not be paved so the absorption rate should not change. The only portion of the project where the absorption rate will change is the east half of East Avenue fronting the site which is being paved. Concrete curb and gutter is being installed to direct the flows in the street to Summit Avenue. No further mitigation measures are required. 6.a. Noise levels are anticipated to increase slightly as a result of the project. Children playing on the football/soccer fields will undoubtedly provide a slight increase in the noise during day light hours. No additional mitigation measures are required. 13.a. The park site is designated to provide recreational services for the surrounding area. Street improvements along the frontage of East Avenue will allow access to the park. No mitigation measures required. 13.b. The park will generate the need for additional parking on site. A 177 standard stall, 6 handicap stalls and 3 motorcycle stall parking lot will be constructed on the park site primarily for the sports facility users. Parking will also be allowed on East Avenue. With these improvements, no mitigation measures are required. 13.d. The development of the park will generate some additional traffic, but it will likely occur during period of non-school use i.e. on Saturdays and Sundays when Pop-Wamer Football and AYSO Soccer have their games. The extension of East Avenue will be able to accommodate this additional traffic. No further mitigation measures are required. 16.d. A new septic tank will be installed in the park for the public restrooms. A copy of the soil percolation report is attached for review. Group GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS SOIL PERCOLATION REPORT FOR PROPOSED NORTHEAST PARK NE OF SUMMIT AND EAST AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA for RJM Design Group, Inc. 27285 Las Ramblas, Suite 250 Mission Viejo, CA 92691 October 5, 1995 95-195-02 Group GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS 10851 EDISON CT., RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730: 909-989-1751: FAX 909-989-4287 October 4, 1995 RJM Design Group, Inc. 27285 Las Rambias, Suite 250 Mission Viejo, CA 92691 Attention: Mr. Bob Meuting Subject: Soil Percolation Report Proposed Northeast Park NE of Summit and East Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, CA Legal Description: Being a portion of the south one-half of the northeast one-quarter of Section 28. T, 1 N., R. 6 W., San Bernardino Meridian in the County of San Bernardino, State of California, according to the official government township plat approved by the surveyor general, December 17, 1874. Gentlemen: In accordance with your request, a soil percolation report has been completed for the above-referenced site. The purpose of our investigation was to provide information on the percolation characteristics of near surface soils for installation of an individual sewage disposal system. The accompanying report presents a description of our findings, as well as our conclusions and recommendations. We appreciate this opportunity to be of continued service to you. If you have any questions regarding this 'report, please do not hesitate to contact us at your convenience. Respectfully submitted, RMA Group E. Duane Lyon, P.E. President GE #547 Expires 12/31/97 Group GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS RJM Design Group, Inc. Proposed Northeast Park Rancho Cucamonga, CA October 4, 1995 1.00 1.01 1.02 1.03 1.04 1.05 1.06 SITE DESCRIPTION Notification of Testing Client Information Site Location Planned Usage Site Description Investigation Methods TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1 1 1 1 1 2 2.00 2.01 EQUIPMENT Equipment 3 3 3.00 3.01 3.02 3.03 3.04 3.04.1 3.04.2 METHODOLOGY Location of Borings and Trenches Soil Characteristics Minimum Number of Exploratory Trenches Minimum Number of Tests for Leach Lines Test Procedure for Leach Lines Leach Line Test Results 3 4 4 4 4 4 4.00 DISCUSSION 4.01 Soil Classification 5 5 RMA Job N° 95-195-02 Page i Group GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS RJM Design Group, Inc. Proposed Northeast Park Rancho Cucamonga, CA October 4, 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) 5.00 5.01 5.02 5.03 DESIGN General Criteria Leach Line Design Rates Proposed System Design 6.00 SYSTEM PLOT 6.01 Plot Plan 7.00 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 6 8.00 CLOSURE 7 Plate 1 Plate 2 Plate 3 Plate 4 Plate 5 PLATES Index Map Design Calculations Typical Leach Line Cross Section Separation Distances Typical Leach Line System APPENDICES Appendix A Field Exploration Appendix B References A1 B1 RMA Job N° 95-195-02 Page ii Group GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS RJM Design Group, Inc. Proposed Northeast Park Rancho Cucamonga, CA October 4, 1995 1.00 SITE DESCRIPTION 1.01 Notification of Testing Scott Mass at the County of San Bernardino, Department of Environmental Health was notified by telephone on September 11, 1995 as to the proposed testing at the site. 1.02 Client Information This report has been prepared at the request of Mr. Bob Meting at RJM Design Group, Inc. Their address is as follows: 27285 Las Rambias, Suite 250 Mission Viejo, CA 92691 1.03 Site Location The subject property consists of approximately 37 acres. The site is rectangular in shape and bounded by vacant property to the north, a school and vacant property to the south, Etiwanda Creek to the east and East Ave to the west. Plate 1 is an Index Map showing the location of the site. 1.04 Planned Usage It is our understanding that the subject site is to be developed as a park facility and football fields and a total of 205 parking spaces. The topographic and boundary survey plat used in this report was prepared by Derbish Guerra & Associates. This report has been prepared prior to completion of the grading and foundation plans. 1.05 Site Description The site is currently vacant. Topographically, the property is essentially planar in nature, sloping to the south to southeast at roughly a 3 to 4% grade. Onsite elevations range from a high of approximately 1,554 feet to a low of 1,443 feet. RMA Job N° 95-195-02 Page 1 Group GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS RJM Design Group, Inc. Proposed Northeast Park Rancho Cucamonga, CA October 4, 1995 A 5 to 7 feet deep man made drainage course exists along the westerly 1/2 of the northerly property line. Site drainage is by means of sheet flow to the south and southeast. No water was present within the drainage at the time of our investigation. Existing vegetation consisted of sparse weeds and Eucalyptus trees. No trees over 12 inches in diameter are expected to remain in the proposed disposal area. There are few scattered stock piles of concrete debris near the southwest portion of the site. To the best of our knowledge, no existing or abandoned wells are located within the subject site or within 300 feet of the proposed disposal area. No rock outcroppings were observed at the subject site. Ground water or evidence of historic ground water was not encountered in any of the exploratory trenches. Based on Reference 3 the depth to ground water in the vicinity of the subject site is approximately 200 feet. 1.06 Investigation Methods Our investigation consisted of a field exploration,field testing of typical soil types, a review of the information obtained in the exploration and testing phases, and preparation of this report. This report has been prepared using the guidelines of the County of San Bernardino Environmental Health Services' "Soil Percolation Report Standards" latest revision dated August 1992. This report contains a description of the methods and equipment used in performing the field exploration and testing, logs of each exploratory trench, and the results of our field tests. Definitions of technical terms and symbols used in this report are those of the American Society For Testing And Materials (ASTM D653). The stratigraphic lines presented on our test hole logs represent the approximate boundaries between soil types, and the transition may be gradual. The logs show subsurface conditions at the dates and locations indicated, and may not be representative of subsurface conditions at other locations and times. Should soil conditions be encountered during construction that appear different from those shown in this report, this office should be notified immediately so that our recommendations may be re-evaluated. RMA Job N° 95-195-02 Page 2 Group GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS RJM Design Group, Inc. Proposed Northeast Park Rancho Cucamonga, CA October 4, 1995 2.00 EQUIPMENT 2.01 Equipment The field exploration consisted of one exploratory trench excavated to a maximum depth of 15 feet, and 4 test holes excavated to the proposed leach line depth. The exploratory trenches and test holes were excavated with a tractor-mounted backhoe with a 24 inch bucket. Test holes were excavated in the bottom of the test trenches using a 6 inch diameter clam type posthole digger. Percolation measurements were made to the nearest 1/10 of an inch using a measuring tape with 1/100 inch divisions. 3.00 METHODOLOGY 3.01 Location of Borings and Trenches The exploratory trench and test holes were excavated at the subject site at locations which in our professional opinion reflect the soil conditions that underlie the planned disposal area. The locations of the exploratory trench and test holes are indicated on the plot plan presented with this report. The location of exploratory trench and test holes was approximately located by using the topographic features noted on the plan indicated in section 1.03 of this report. The location of the test holes should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the methods used. A log of each test hole and exploratory trench was prepared by one of our staff. The log contains factual information and interpretation of the soil conditions between samples. The stratum indicated on these logs represent the approximate boundary between soil types and the transition may be gradual. The logs of the trench and test holes are presented in appendix A. Identification of the soils encountered during the exploration was made using the field identification procedure of the Unified Soils Classification System (ASTM D2488). A legend indicating the symbols and definitions used in this classification system and a legend defining the terms used in describing the relative compaction, consistency or firmness of the soil are presented in appendix A. RMA Job N° 95-195-02 Page 3 Group GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS RJM Design Group, Inc. Proposed Northeast Park Rancho Cucamonga, CA October 4, 1995 3.02 Soil Characteristics Based on our experience in the general vicinity of the subject project and the definitions contained within Reference 1 it is our professional opinion that the soil conditions at the site may be described as favorable with respect to soil percolation characteristics. 3.03 Minimum Number of Exploratory Trenches Based on a soil classification of favorable and the procedures outlined in Reference 1, a minimum of 1 exploratory trench was required. 3.04 Minimum Number of Tests for Leach Lines Based on a soil classification of favorable and the procedures outlined in Reference 1, a minimum of 4 tests for leach lines were required. 3.04.1 Test Procedure for Leach Lines The percolation test holes were excavated to the anticipated depth of proposed leach lines. Percolation tests were done in accordance to the guideline presented in Reference 1 for the Continuous Pre-Soak Test Procedure for Leach Lines. 3.04.2 Leach Line Test Results Our final test results are indicated below. These results have been corrected for gravel packing in accordance with the procedures outlined in Reference 1. The test data are presented in Appendix A. PERCOLATIONRATE Test No. Min./In. 1 1.68 2 2.01 3 1.01 4 1.35 RMA Job N° 95-195-02 Page 4 Group GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS RJM Design Group, Inc. Proposed Northeast Park Rancho Cucamonga, CA October 4, 1995 4.00 DISCUSSION 4.01 Soil Classification Based on the results of our investigation it is our professional opinion that the soil conditions at the subject site may be described as favorable in accordance to the definitions contained in Reference 1. 5.01 General Criteria 5.00 DESIGN Design and construction of sewage disposal systems should comply with current Uniform Plumbing Code, County of San Bernardino Guidelines and the recommendations contained within this report. 5.02 Leach Line Design Rates The proposed leach line is to be constructed in a soils unit that consists of silly sand to gravelly sand with silt. Our test results indicated that the soil unit has uniform percolation characteristics. Based on the results of our tests we recommend that leach lines be designed using a percolation rate of 5 minutes per inch and an application rate of 0.83 square feet per gallon of flow per day. Based on the calculations shown on Plate 2 we recommend a design waste/sewage flow rate of 4200 gallons per day for 205 parking spaces. 5.03 Proposed System Design We recommend that the size of the leach line trench provide 7 square feet of application area per linear foot of trench. This will require a trench measuring 3 feet in width by 3 feet in depth below the leach line pipe. A typical cross section for the recommended leach lines is presented on Plate 3. The proposed sewage disposal systems will therefore require the following: 4,200 gallon septic tank for 205 parking spaces. PdMA Job N° 95-195-02 Page 5 Group GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS RJM Design Group, Inc. Proposed Northeast Park Rancho Cucamonga, CA October 4, 1995 Estimate leach line size for 205 parking spaces 498 linear feet, which provides 7 sq. ft. per linear foot of absorption area (3 feet wide by 3 feet in depth below the leach line pipe). See Plate 3 for a typical leach line section. Typical leach line layouts are provided on the attached plans. Leach lines shall have a minimum cover of 1.5 feet. Minimum separation distances shall be provided as indicated in Plate 4. The final system design is subject to approval by the County of San Bernardino Environmental Health Department. 6.00 SYSTEM PLOT 6.01 Plot Plan A plot plan showing the proposed leach line locations for the subject site is attached. This plan is subject to review by the County of San Bernardino Environmental Health Services. The location of the recommended systems conforms to the requirements set forth in Reference 1. The length of the leach line is based on the recommended 7 square foot per foot application rate. If some other trench dimension is used, the length of the leach line must be changed appropriately. 7.00 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS It is our professional opinion, based on our field exploration and percolation tests, that the soils that underlie the site will provide adequate percolation for the proposed leach line disposal system. The proposed leach line area contains sufficient area for the initial and 100% expansion systems. It is also our opinion that ground water will not encroach within the current allowable limit set forth by the County and State requirements. The recommended application areas and layouts presented are subject to approval and possible revision by the San Bernardino County Environmental Health Department. It is recommended that an accurate as-built plan of the final system be made and kept on file for future reference. RMAJob N° 95-195-02 Page 6 R Group GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS RJM Design Group, Inc. Proposed Northeast Park Rancho Cucamonga, CA October 4, 1995 8.00 CLOSUnE The findings and recommendations in this report were prepared in accordance with generally accepted engineering principles and practices. No other warranty, either express or implied, is made. This report has been prepared for RJM Design Group, Inc., to be used solely for design purposes. Anyone using this report for any other purpose must draw their own conclusions regarding required construction procedures and soil conditions. RMA Job N° 95-195-02 Page 7 ~~A Group GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS PLATES Group GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS RJM Design Group, Inc. Proposed Northeast Park Rancho Cucamonga, CA October 4, 1995 INDEX MAP OF PROPOSED NORTHEAST PARK SITE BASE MAP: Thomas Guide RMA Job N° 95-195-02 PLATE I R MA Cr o up SOIL PERCOLA'FION L E A C H L I N E S G I,ZO'rI,ZCI INICAL CONSULTANTS RJM Dcsign Group, Inc. Proposed No,'theast Park Rancho Cucamonga, CA October 4, 1995 PROOi!;Cr DATA Client:: Rj;4 D~_sign Group Inc. Description: Northeast Park ~ Job ll: 95-195-02 DESIGN PATE C~TIONg Gravel Packing [yes-l, no-O) GP - 1.00 P - 0.41 f · 0.68 FIlIAl, ADJUSTED IT, ST TEST TES'r PATE RATE Ho. {rap i ) {mpi } I 1.00 1.68 2 1.33 2.01 3 0.33 1.01 4 0.67 ] .35 AVG. 0.83 I.SI DESIGN ~I~TIONS ABSORBTION B;GIC II/C'RE;~E DESIGN REQUIRED ARFA REQ'D DE.SIGN ABSORPTION FOR lttCP. E,~E AI1SORPTION PPJtK[NG SYSTF~M ABSORPTION PER LF : bENO'rll PATE AREA COf~lO/l FOR AREA SPACE FLOW JUtEA IRENO{ TRENOI (mpi) [sf/g/day) SYSTE:4 DRIVEWAY (sf/g/day} 205 (gel/day} {s/} (sf/ft) (ft) 5.0 0.83 0.0~ O. 0% 0.83 205 4200 3486 7 498 :OTE: Absorption area is based o. "EPA DES[GI| r.:,M;UAI," 1980 Edition. RMA Job N" 95-195-02 PLATE 2 Group GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS RJM Design Group, Inc. Proposed Northeast Park Rancho Cucamonga, CA October 4, 1995 FINISHED GRADE ...... SOIL BACKFILL ......... 4" PERFORATED PIPE V V V ~ 0 0 0 OQOx~~O) 1) 0 :) O O O O 1 'I/2" GRAVEL Z) O OR O APPROVED MATERIAL ~) O O O O O O O D O O O O O O O O O O O O 3.0 FT. 1.5 FT MIN. / 2" MIN. / / / 3.0 FT. RMA Job N° 95-195-02 TYPICAL CROSS LEACHLINE SECTION PLATE 3 Group GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS RJM Design Group, Inc. Proposed Northeast Park Rancho Cucamonga, CA October 4, 1995 TABLE I-1 LOCATION OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM Minimum Horizontal Distance Building Septic Disposal Seepage Pit In Clear Required From: Sewer Tank Field or Cesspool Buildings or Structures' 2 leer (.6 m) 5 feet (1.5 m) 8 feet (2.4 m) 8 feet (2.4 m) Property line adjoining private property Clear~ 5 feet (1.5 m) 5 feel (1.5 m) 8 feet (2.4 m) Water supply wells 50 feet3 (15.2 m) 50 feet (t5.2 m) 100 feet (30.5 m) 150 feel (45.7 m) Streams 50 feet (15.2 m) 50 feel (15.2 m) 50 feet (15.2 m) 100 feel (30.5 m) Trees ...... 10 feet (3 m) ...... 10 leer (3 m) Seepage pils or cesspools ...... 5 feet (1.5 m) 5 feet (1.5 m) 12 feet (3.7 m) Disposal field ...... 5 feel (1.5 m) 4 feet' (1.2 m) 5 feel (1.5 m) On site domestic water service line 1 loots (.3 m) 5 feet (1.5 m) 5 feet (1.5 m) 5 feet (1.5 m) Distribution box ............ 5 leer (1,5 m) 5 feet (1,5 m) Pressure public water main 10 feet~ (3 m) 10 leer (3 m) 10 feet (3 m) 10 feel (3 m) NOTE: When disposal fields and/or seepage pits are installed in sloping ground, the minimum horizontal distance between any part ol Ihe leaching system and ground surface shall be fifteen (15) feet (4.5 m). 1. Including porches and steps, whether covered or uncovered, breezeways, roofed pode-cocheres, roofed patios, car ports, covered walks, covered driveways and similar struclures or appurtenances. 2. See also Section 315(c) of the Unilorm Plumbing Code, 3. All drainage piping shall clear domestic water supply wells by at least tifty (50) feet (15.2 m). This distance may be reduced to not less than twenty-five (25) feel (7.6 m) when the drainage piping is constructed of materials approved for use within a building. 4. Plus two (2) feet (.6 m) for each additional foot (.3 m) of depth in excess ol one (t) foot (.3 m) below lhe bottom of the drain line. (See also Section 16.) 5. See Section 1108 of the Uniform Plumbing Code. 6. For parallel construction --- For crossings, approval by Ihe Health Department shall be required. RMA Job N° 95-195-02 PLATE 4 51 Group GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS RJM Design Group, Inc. Proposed Northeast Park Rancho Cucamonga, CA October 4, 1995 4,200 GALLON SEPTIC TANK 8' MIN PROPOSED STRUCTURE / RESTROOM DISTRIBUTION BOX 100~ EXPANSION AREA % F1FIRFIR 5' MIN. 5' MIN U U NOT TO SCALE RMA Job N° 95-195-02 100' NOTE: 1. The leach lines shall be constructed down slope from the proposed restroom. , After completion of drawings, a new drawing shell be submitted to RMA Group for review and possible revision of leech line locations. UUU MIN MIN TYPICAL LEACH LINE SYSTEM PLATE 5 Y ~R~fA GrOUp GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS APPENDIX A FIELD EXPLORATION Group GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS RJM Design Group, Inc. Proposed Northeast Park Rancho Cucamonga, CA October 4, 1995 RESTRO0 /iOCCER I I P-4 - -3 I O O P- D 0 ' PARKING AREA OCCER DE STRUCTURES FIELD MULTIPURPOSE FIELD LEGEND SCALE:"~:' = 400' RMA Job N° 95-195-02 INDICATES APPROXIMATE PERCOLATION TESTHOLE LOCATIONS INDICATES APPROXIMATE OBSERVATION TRENCH LOCATION PLOT PLAN Page A 1 Group GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS RJM Design Group, Inc. Proposed Northeast Park Rancho Cucamonga, CA October 4, 1995 PERCOLATION TEST DATA SHEET EQUATIONS RATE = T/D Ti = Time of initial depth to water surface measurement Tf = Time of final depth to water surface measurement T = Time between depth measurements (Tf - Ti) Di = Initial depth to water surface. Df = Final distance to water surface. D = Change in water surface elevatio test. period (Df - Di). TEST DATA Number: P-1 Location: SEE PLOT PLAN Diameter: 8" Soil type: Qal Initial Depth: 13" Date: Pre-soak time: Depth below grade: Final Depth: 09-12-95 5.0' 13" Accum. Ti Tf Di Df T D Time Rate (hr.min) (hr.min) (in) (in) (min) (in) (min) (min/in) 12.00 12.03 12.06 12.09 12.12 12.15 12.18 12.03 12 06 12 09 12 12 12 15 12 18 12 21 12 00 12 00 12 00 12 00 12 00 12 00 12 00 9 00 9 00 9 00 9 00 9 00 9 00 9 00 3 3 3 3 3 6 3 3 9 3 3 12 3 3 15 3 3 18 3 3 21 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Rate: 1.00 R~4A Job N° 95-195-02 min/inch Page A2 Group GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS RJM Design Group, Inc. Proposed Northeast Park Rancho Cucamonga, CA October 4, 1995 PERCOLATION TEST DATA SHEET EQUATIONS PATE = T/D Ti = Time of initial depth to water surface measurement Tf = Time of final depth to water surface measurement T = Time between depth measurements (Tf - Ti) Di = Initial depth to water surface. Df = Final distance to water surface. D = Change in water surface elevatio test. period (Df - Di). TEST DATA Number: P-2 Location: SEE PLOT PLAN Diameter: 8" Soil type: Qal Initial Depth: 13" Date: 09-12-95 Pre-soak time: - Depth below grade: 5.0' Final Depth: 13" Accum. Ti Tf Di Df T D Time Rate (hr.min) (hr.min) (in) (in) (min) (in) (rain) (min/in) 12.20 12.24 12.24 12.28 12.28 12.32 12.32 12.36 12.36 12.40 12.40 12.44 12 00 12 00 12 00 12 00 12 00 12 00 9 00 9 00 9 00 9 00 9 00 9 00 4 3 4 4 3 8 4 3 12 4 3 16 4 3 20 4 3 24 1 33 1 33 1 33 1 33 1 33 1 33 Rate: 1.33 min/inch RMA Job N° 95-195-02 Page A3 Group GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS RJM Design Group, Inc. Proposed Northeast Park Rancho Cucamonga, CA October 4, 1995 PERCOLATION TEST DATA SHEET EQUATIONS RATE = T/D Ti = Time of initial depth to water surface measurement Tf = Time of final depth to water surface measurement T = Time between depth measurements (Tf - Ti) Di = Initial depth to water surface. Df = Final distance to water surface. D = Change in water surface elevatio test. period (Df - Di). TEST DATA Number: P-3 Location: SEE PLOT PLAN Diameter: 8" Soil type: Qal Initial Depth: 13" Date: 09-12-95 Pre-soak time: - Depth below grade: 4.0' Final Depth: 13" Accum. Ti Tf Di Df T D Time Rate (hr.min) .(hr.min) (in) (in) (min) (in) (min) (min/in) 12 46 12 47 12 48 12.49 12 50 12 51 12 52 12.47 12 48 12 49 12 50 12 51 12 52 12 53 12 00 12 00 12 00 12 00 12 00 12 00 12 00 9 00 9 00 9 00 9 00 9 00 9 00 9 00 1 3 1 1 3 2 1 3 3 1 3 4 1 3 5 1 3 6 1 3 7 0 33 0 33 0 33 0 33 0 33 0 33 0 33 Rate: 0.33 min/inch RMA Job N° 95-195-02 Page A4 Group GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS RJM Design Group, Inc. Proposed Northeast Park Rancho Cucamonga, CA October 4, 1995 PERCOLATION TEST DATA SHEET EQUATIONS PATE = T/D Ti = Time of initial depth to water surface measurement Tf = Time of final depth to water surface measurement T = Time between depth measurements (Tf - Ti) Di = Initial depth to water surface. Df = Final distance to water surface. D = Change in water surface elevatio test. period (Df - Di). TEST DATA Number: P-4 Location: SEE PLOT PLAN Diameter: 8". Soil type: Qal Initial Depth: 13" Date: 09-12-95 Pre-soak time: - Depth below grade: 5.0' Final Depth: 13" Accum. Ti Tf Di Df T D Time Rate (hr.min) (hr.min) (in) (in) (min) (in) (min) (min/in) 12 55 12 57 12 59 13 01 13 03 13 05 13 07 12.57 12.59 13.01 13.03 13.05 13.07 13.09 12 00 12 00 12 00 12 00 12 00 12 00 12 00 9 O0 9 O0 9 O0 9 O0 9 O0 9 O0 9 O0 2 3 2 2 3 4 2 3 6 2 3 8 2 3 10 2 3 12 2 3 14 0 67 0 67 0 67 0 67 0 67 0 67 0 67 Rate: 0.67 ..~ RMA Job N° 95- ] 95-02 min/inch Page A5 ~~fA Group GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS APPENDIX B REFERENCES Group GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS RJM Design Group, Inc. Proposed Northeast Park Rancho Cucamonga, CA October 5, 1995 o , , APPENDIX B REFERENCES County of San Bernardino Environmental Health Services Soil Percolation Report Standards, latest revision, dated September 19, 1984. International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials, Uniform Plumbing Code 1979 Edition. Fife, D.L. and others, 1976, Geologic Hazards in Southwestern San Bernardino County, California: California Division of Mines and Geology Special Report 113. USGS Eros Data Center (NAPP), Area Photos of the San Gabriel Mountains, dated August 24, 1990. Derbish Guerra & Associates, Topography and Boundary Survey Plat, Sheets 1 through 3, dated February, 1995. RJM Design Group, Inc., Preliminary Master Plan for Phase I, Northeast Park, City of Rancho Cucamonga, undated. RMA Job N° 95-195~02 Page B 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: By: SUBJECT: March 5, 1996 Mayor and Members of the City' Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Henry Murakoshi, Associate Engineer Approval of the Cost and Maintenance Agreement between the City of Rancho Cueamonga and the Atchison, Topeka, and Santa Fe Railway Company (A.T. & S.F.) for the proposed improvement of the A.T. & S.F. Spur crossing of Arrow Route, located west of Milliken Avenue, and designated as CPUC Crossing No. 2-96.4-C. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached Resolution authorizing execution of the Cost and Maintenance Agreement between the City and the A.T. & S.F. Railway Company. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Execution of this agreement is required prior to the A.T. & S.F. Railway Company beginning their improvements which include; rehabilitation of the railroad tracks, placing of rubberized crossing material, and the installation of railroad signals. Concurrently, the City will widen Arrow Route from west of the spur to Milliken Avenue to provide two traffic lanes in each direction. Copies of the agreement are on file in the City Clerks Office. City Engineer WJO:BRH:cb Attachment RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE EXECUTION OF THE COST AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA, AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY FOR THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT OF THE A.T. & S.F. SPUR CROSSING OFARROW ROUTE, DESIGNATED AS CPUC CROSSING NO. 2-96.4-C. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter referred to as "City"), has for its consideration and execution, the Cost and Maintenance Agreement with the Atchison, Topeka, and Santa Fe Railway Company (hereinafter referred to as "Santa Fe"), for the proposed improvement of Arrow Route at the A.T. & S.F.. Railway Crossing designated as CPUC Crossing No. 2-96.4-C; and WHEREAS, Santa Fe and the City are in mutual accord with the conditions specified in the attached Cost and Maintenance Agreement; and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES that said Cost and Maintenance Agreement be approved and accepted, and authorize the Mayor to execute the same, and direct the City Clerk to attach a certified copy of this Resolution to both original copies of said Agreement and mail said copy to the Atchison, Topeka, and Santa Fe Railway Company. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 5, 1996 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Jerry A. Dyer, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND SECURITY FOR THE FOURTH STREET IMPROVEMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 108 WITHIN THE CITY OF ONTARIO, SUBMITTED BY VANCE CORPORATION RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject agreement and security, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The City of Ontario has formed Assessment District No. 108 for the property generally located at the southeast comer of Milliken Avenue and Fourth Street. Said property is now under development by the Mills Corporation. As a condition of said development Fourth Street is to be widened, traffic signals installed and/or modified, and a landscape median island constructed. We have approved the street and traffic signal plans, and have requested the original drawings for the landscaping improvements to be forwarded for City approval. The Contractor, Vance Corporation, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of said improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: Labor and Materialmen Bond: $394,148.00 $197,074.00 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted, William J. O~Neil City Engineer WJO:JAD ~,,_Attachments VICINITY MAP CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY LIMITS 121 \ FOURTH STREET ~ LOCATION CITY OF ONTARIO CITY LIMITS N.T.S. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH STREET IMPROVEMENTS (ONTARIO MILLS PROJECT) RESOLUTION NO. ~ .-, (~__ ,~ ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND SECURITY FOR THE FOURTH STREET IMPROVEMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 108 WITHIN THE CITY OF ONTARIO WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement submitted by Vance Corporation, Contractor, for the improvements along Fourth Street between Milliken Avenue and Buffalo Avenue within the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of the real property within the City Ontario, associated with Assessment District No. 108, generally located at the southeast comer of Milliken Avenue and Fourth Street; and WHEREAS, the Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, HEREBY RESOLVES that said Improvement Agreement and Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. CITY OF RANCHO CUCA1VIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: March 5, 1996 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager, William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Cathy A. Becker, Public Works Inspector II AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A '%lOTICE OF COMPLETION" FOR ELLENA PARK PHASE I IMPROVEMENTS RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council approve the Ellena Park Phase I Improvement Project, located within the Victoria Vineyard South Villiage at the northwest comer of Base Line Road and Rochester Avenue, and authorize the City Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion." BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Phase II improvements are to be completed prior to the issuance of the 451 st building permit, within the Victoria Vineyards South Village, per the Victoria Community Plan amendment 94-01. Currently 401 building permits have been issued. Respectively submitted, William J.. O 'Neil City Engineer WJO:CAB :sd Attachment RESOLUTION NO. q~ '~ (~Z)~_3 / A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR ELLENA PARK, PHASE I AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Ellena Park, Phase I have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucarnonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. ORDINANCE NO. -5 -5~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CITY'S PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM (PERS) CONTRACT An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, and the Board of Administration of the California Public Employees' Retirement System. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows: Section 1. That an amendment to the contract between the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Board of Administration, California Public Employees' Retirement System is hereby authorized, a copy of said amendment being attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A", and by such reference made a part hereof as though herein set out in full. Section 2. The Mayor of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby authorized, empowered and directed to execute said amendment for and on behalf of said Agency. Section 3. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after the date of its adoption, and prior to the expiration of thirty (30) days from the passage thereof shall be published at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Flulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, Califomia, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Adopted and approved this day of ,1996. William J. Alexander, Mayor Resolution No, 96-002 Page 3 AIV~,ND~ TO CONTRACT BETWEEN THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA The Board of Admini-~tration, Public Employees' Retirement System, hereinafter referred to as Board, and the governing body of above public agency, hereinafxer referred to u Public Agency, having entered into a contract effective January 7.8, 1978, and witnessed January 26, 1978, and u amended effective September 22, 1980, November 16, 1981 and September 26. 1988. which provides for participation of Public Agency in said System, Board and Public Agency hereby agree as follows: Paragraphs 1 through 10 are hereby stricken from said contract u executed effective September 26, 1988, and hereby repl=_c_-~_ by the following paragraphs numbered I through 11 inclusive: All words and terms used herein which are defined in the Public Employees' Retirement Law shall have the meaning as defined therein unless otherwise specffically provided. 'Normal retirement age" shall mean age 55 for local miscellaneous members. Public Agency shall participate in the Public Employees' Retirement System from and after January 28, 1978 making its employees as hereinafter provided, members of said System subject to all provisions of the Public Employees' Retirement Law except such as apply only on election of a contracting agency and are not provided for herein and to all amendments to said Law hereafzer enacted except those, which by express provisions thereof, apply only on the election of a contracting agency. Employees of Public Agency in the following classes shall become members of said Retirement System except such in each such class as are excluded by law or this agreement: Pmp,!oyees other than local safety members (herein referred to as local miscellaneous members). h addition to the classes of employees excluded from membership by said Retirement Law, the following classes of employees shall not become members of said Retirement System: The percentage of final compemation to be provided for each year of credited prior and current service u a local miscellaneom member shall be determined in accordance with Section 21251.132 of said Retirement Law (2% at age ~5 Full). Resolution No. 96-002 Page 4 PLEASE DO NOT SIGN "EXHIBIT ONLY' s s s Public Agency eleaed and elects to be subject to the following optional provisions: a. Section 20024.2 (One-Year Final Compensation). b. Section 20930.3 (Military Service Credit as Public Service), Statutes of 1976. Sections 21022/21022.1 (Industrial Disability Retirement For Local Miscellaneous Mereben). d. Section 21298 ('h'nproved Non-Industrial Disability Allowance). Section 21382.4 (Third Level of 1959 Survivor Benefits) pursuant to Article 6 (commencing with Section 21380). Section 20614, Statutes of 1978, (Reduction of Normal Member Contribution Rate). From September 22, 1980 and until November 15, 1981, the normal local miscellaneous member contribution rate shall be 0%. Legislation repealed said Section effective September 29, 1980. g. Section 20614, Statutes of 1980, (To Prospectively Revoke Section 20614, Statutes of 1978). Public Agency, in accordance with Government Code Section 20759, shah not be considered an "employer" for purposes of the Public Employes' Retirement Law. Contributions of the Public Agency shall be fixed and determined as pwvided in Government Code Seaion 20759, and such contributions hereafter made shall be held by the Board as provided in Government Code Section 20759. Public Agency shall contribute to said Retirement System the contributions determined by acmarial valuations of prior and future service liability with respect to local miscellaneous mereben of said Retirement System. Public Agency shall also contribute to said Retirement System u follows: Public Agency shall contribute $2.00 per member, per month on account of the liability for the 1959 Survivor Benefits provided under Section 21382.4 of said Retirement Law. (Subject to annual change.) In addition, all assets and liabilities of Public Agency and its employees shall be pooled in a single account, based on term insurance rates, for survivors of all local miscellaneous menben. A reasonable amount, as fixed by the Board, payable in one installment within 60 days of date of contraa to cover the costs of administering said System as it ~fects the employees of Public Agency, not including the costs of special valuations or of the periodic investigation and valuations required by law. A reasonable amount, as fixed by the Board, payable in one imtalhnent as the occasions arise, m cover the costs of special valuations on account of employees of Public Agency, and costs of the periodic investigation and valuations required bylaw. Resolution No. 96-002 Page 5 10. Contributions required of Public Agency taxi its employees shall be subject to sdjustment by Board on account of amendments to the Public Employees' Retirement Law, and on account of the experience under the Retirement System ~s determined by the periodic investigation and valuation required by said Retirement Law. ll. Contributions required of Public Agency and its employees shall be paid by Public Agency to the Retirement System within fifteen days after the end of ~e period to which said contributions refer or u may be prescribed by Board regulation. If more or less than the correct mount of contributions is paid for any period, proper adjnstn~nt shall be made in connection with subsequent remittances. Adjus~nents on account of errors in contributions required of any employee may be made by direct payments between the employee and the Board. This amendment shall be effeaive on the day of ,19 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' ~E,~,/~ZNT BOARD OF ADIVflNISTRATION PUBLIC,~/~,,e/.~RP. LOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM SYSTEM CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RAN~4r~)~ CUCAMONGA BY Presiding Officer Witness Date Attest: Clerk AMENDMENT PER.~CON-702A (P, ev. 3/t~) ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 10.20.020 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMO NGA CITY CODE REGARDING PPdMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN CITY STREETS A. Recitals (i) California Vehicle Code Section 22357 Provides that this City Council may, by ordinance, set prima facie speed limits upon any portion of any street not a state highway. (ii) The City Traffic Engineer has conducted an engineering and traffic survey, of certain streets within the City of Rancho Cucamonga which streets as specified in Part B of this Ordinance. (ili5 The determinations concerning prima faCle' speed limits set forth in Part B, below, are based upon the engineering and traffic survey identified in Section A (ii), above. B. Ordinance NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1 Section 10.20.020 hereby is amended to the Rancho Cucamonga City Code to read, in words and figures, as follows: 10.20.020 Decrease of state law maximum speed. It is determined by City Council resolution and upon the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation that the speed permitted by state law is greater than is reasonable or safe under the conditions found to exist upon such streets, and it is declared the prima facie speed limit shall be as set forth in this section on those streets or parts of streets designated in this section when signs are erected giving notice hereof: Declared Prima Facie Name of Street or Portion Affected Speed Limit (MPH) 1. Archibald Avenue - Banyan Street to north end 50 2. Archibald Avenue - 4th Street to Banyan Street 45 3. Arrow Route - Baker Avenue to Haven Avenue 45 4. Baker Avenue - 8th Street to Foothill Blvd 35 5. Banyan Street from Beryl Street to London Avenue 35 6. Banyan Street - Haven Avenue to Rochester Avenue 45 7. Banyan Street from west City Limits to Beryl Street 40 SPEED LIMIT ORDINANCE March 6, 1996 Page 2 Name of Street or Portion Affected 8. Base Line Road - west City limits to Carnelian Street 9. Base Line Road - Carnelian Street to Hermosa Avenue 10. Base Line Road - Hermosa Avenue to Spruce Avenue 11. Beryl Street - Banyan Street to end 12. Beryl Street - 800' N/o Lemon Avenue to Banyan Street 13. Canistel Avenue - Wilson Avenue to Antietam Drive 14. Carnelian Street - Vineyard Avenue to end 15. Center Avenue - Foothill Boulevard to Church Street 16. Church Street - Pepper Street to Haven Avenue 17. Church Street - Archibald Avenue to Haven Avenue 18. Church Street - Haven Avenue to Milliken Avenue 19. East Avenue - Base Line Road to Highland Avenue 20. 8th Street - Grove Avenue to Haven Avenue 21. Etiwanda Avenue - Foothill Boulevard to 241h Street 22. Fairmont Drive - Highland Avenue to Milliken Avenue 23. Fairmont Drive - Milliken Avenue to Victoria Park Lane 24. Fredricksburg Avenue - Banyan Street to Seven Pines Drive 25. Grove Avenue - 8th Street to Foothill Boulevard 26. Haven Avenue - 4th Street to Hillside Road 27. Hellman Avenue - Foothill Boulevard to Alta Loma Drive 28. Hellman Avenue - 500' N/o Manzanita Drive to Valley View 29. Hellman Avenue - 6th Street to Foothill Boulevard 30. Hermosa Avenue - Base Line Road to Wilson Avenue 31. Hermosa Avenue - Wilson Avenue to Sun Valley Drive 32. Hermosa Avenue - 8th Street to Base Line Road 33. Highland Avenue - Sapphire Street to Camelian Street 34. Highland Avenue - Amethyst Street to Hermosa Avenue 35. Highland Avenue - Hermosa Avenue to 800' W/o Haven Avenue 36. Hillside Road - Ranch Gate to Amethyst Street 37. Hillside Road - Amethyst Street to Haven Avenue 38. Hillside Road - Haven Avenue to Canistel Avenue 39. Hillview Loop - Vintage Drive to Vintage Drive 40. Kenyon Way ~ Milliken Avenue to Victoria Park Lane Declared Prima Facie Speed Limit (MPH) 45 40 45 45 40 35 45 40 40 40 45 45 45 45 35 35 35 40 45 35 40 45 45 40 45 40 35 45 35 40 35 30 35 SPEED LIMIT ORDINANCE March 6, 1996 Page 3 Declared Prima Facie Name of Street or Portion Affected Speed Limit (MPH) 41. Lark Drive - Kenyon Way to Rochester Avenue 35 42. Lemon Avenue - Jasper Street to Beryl Street 35 43. Lemon Avenue - Archibald Avenue to Haven Avenue 40 44. Lemon Avenue - Haven Avenue to Highland Avenue 40 45. Manzanita Drive - Hermosa Avenue to Haven Avenue 35 46. Morning Place/Vintage Drive - Banyan Street to Milliken Avenue 35 47. Mountain View Drive - Spruce Avenue to Milliken Avenue 40 48. Netherlands View Loop - Vintage Drive to Vintage Drive 30 49. 9th Street - Baker Avenue to Archibald Avenue 40 50. Red Hill Country Club Drive - Foothill Blvd to Alta Cuesta 35 51. Rochester Avenue - Foothill Boulevard to Base Line Road 40 52. San Bernardino Road - Vineyard Avenue to Archibald Avenue 35 53. Sapphire Street - Banyan Street to end 45 54. Sapphire Street - 19th Street to Lemon Avenue 40 55. 7th Street - Hellman Avenue to Archibald Avenue 45 56. Sierra Crest View Loop - Vintage Drive to Vintage Drive 30 57. Spruce Avenue - Foothill Boulevard to Base'Line Road 40 58. 6th Street - West City Limits to Archibald Avenue 45 59. Summit Avenue ~ Etiwanda Avenue to East Avenue 45 60. Terrace View Loop - Vintage Drive to Vintage Drive 30 61. Terra Vista Parkway - Church Street to Milliken Avenue 40 62. Victoria Street - Archibald Avenue to Ramona Avenue 35 63. Victoria Street - Etiwanda Avenue to Route 15 40 64. Victoria Street - Haven Avenue to Mendocino Place 40 65. Victoria Park Lane - Fairmont Way to Base Line Road 35 66. Victoria Windrows Loop (north &south) 35 67. Vineyard Avenue - Church Street to Base Line Road 40 68. Vineyard Avenue - 8th Street to Carnelian Avenue 45 69. Vintage Drive - Milliken Avenue to east end 35 70. Whittram Avenue - Etiwanda Avenue to east City limits 40 71. Wilson Avenue - Amethyst Avenue to Haven Avenue 45 72. Wilson Avenue - Haven Avenue to 200' east of Canistel Avenue 40 (Ord. 169 Section I (part), 1982; Ord. 39 Section 5.1, (1978). Rancho Cucamonga 5/82 124 f CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 5, 199~ TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O~Neil, City Engineer By: Linda Beek, Jr. Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT DECLARATION AND AWARD AND AUTHORIZATION FOR EXECUTION OF CONTRACT FOR NORTHEAST PARK AND EAST AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve Enviromental Assessment Declaration, award and authorize for execution the contract for Northeast Park and East Avenue Street Improvements, to the lowest responsive bidder. The park is to be funded from Account Nos. 47-4130-9528, 27-4532- 8924, 20-4532-8924 and 34-8532-8924. The resurfacing of East Avenue is to be funded from Account No. 10-4637-9507. The unpaved section of East Avenue is to be funded from Air Quality Improvement Grant. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Pursuant to law, an enviromental assessment was undertaken within the limits of the park site. All findings were negative. Also, per previous City Council action, bids were solicited and a bid date of March 5, 1996, was set. To avoid any delay in this project a bid summary and announcement of the lowest responsive bidder will be submitted to City Council prior to the City Council meeting. The Engineer's estimate is $1,400,000.00 for Phase I of Northeast Park. Respect b,,m~ William J O~leil City Engineer WJO:LB:dlw Attachments