Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999/02/17 - Agenda Packet - Addendum CITY OF RANCHO C[,?CAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 17, 1999 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY Henry Murakoshi, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF MAP AND OILDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 FOR TRACT MAP NUMBER 15072-1 AND 15072, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND ROCHESTER AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY KAUFMAN AND BROAD OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Tract Map Number 15072-I and 15072, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 4, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign and to cause said map to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tentative Tract Map No. 15072, located at the southwest comer of Rochester Avenue and Base Line Road, was approved by the Planning Commission of the 24a day of June, 1998, for a residential subdivision of 519 single family lots on 90 acres of land in the Low Medium Residential Designation within the Terra Vista Community Plan. Letters of approval have been received from the high school and elementary school districts and Cucamonga County Water District. C.C. & R.'s have also been approved by the City Attorney. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation form signed by the Developer is on file in the City Clerk's office. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Securities are on tonights agenda as item D- 1 I. Respectfully Submitted, City Engineer WJO:HM:diw Attachments A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NO. 15072-1 ANDI5072 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 15072, submitted by Kaufman and Broad of Southern California, and consisting of 545 units, located on the southwest comer of Base Line Road and Rochester Avenue, being a subdivision of 545 single family lots on 90 acres of land in the Medium Residential District was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on June 24, 1998, and is in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and Local Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that Act; and WHEREAS, Tract Map No. 15072-1 and 15072 are the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Tract Map; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met by entry into an Improvement Agreement guaranteed by acceptable Improvement Security by Kaufman and Broad of Southern California as developer; and WHEREAS, said Developer submits for approval said Tract Map offering for dedication, for street, highway and related highway purposes, tile streets delineated thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES, that said offers for dedication and tile final map delineating the same for said Tract Map No. 15072-1 and 15072 are hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 4 FOR TRACT MAP NUMBER 15072-I AND 15072 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code ofthe State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 4, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. I and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 (hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer% "Report". NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the property as shown in Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto to the Maintenance District. SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder. VICI, N ITY N/AI' aAsm u~t~ Ro~,,o ~: ~T'XON -.1 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTFIICT NOS. 1 AND , II ~ ~ EXHIBIT "B" WORK PROGRAM PROJECT: TRACT MAP NO. 15072-1 AND 15072 STREET LIGHTS: NUMBER OF LAMPS Dist. 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L S1 --- 65 ......... S4 --- 10 ......... LANDSCAPING: Community Equestrian Trail Turf Non-Turf Trees Hardscape Dist. D.G.SF. SF. S~F. Ea. S.F. L4 ...... 8,5 ! 0 ! 8 5,640 * Existing items installed with original project. ASSESSMENT UNITS: Assessment Units By District Parcel DU S 1 S4 L4 N/A 519 519 519 519 Annexation Date: City Council Date February 17, 1999 Form Date 11/16/94 TRACT MAP 14475 BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT REPORT January 8, 1999 Prepared for.' Allard Engineering 6101 Cherry Avenue R I= C I= [ V E Fontana CA 92336 JAN 1 1 1999 City of Rancho Cucamonga Prepared by: PJanning Division LSA Associates, Inc. 3403 I0~n Street, Suite 520 Riverside, California 92501 (909) 781-9310 LSA Project #WTL830 LSA Associates, Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION METHODS VEGETATION CALIFORNIA GNATCATCHER ......................... 2 SAN BERNARDINO MERRIAM'S KANGAROO RAT ........... 3 LANDSCAPE-LEVEL AND REGIONAL IMPACTS ............ 4 PROJECT IMPACTS SIGNIFICANCE CRITERIA ............................. 4 MITIGATION MEASURES .................................. 6 LITERATURE CITED ...................................... APPENDICES A - SPECIES LIST B - SENSITIVE SPECIES TABLE I/8/99((R:\wt1830\final_report-complete)) ii LSA Associates, Inc, TRACT MAP 14475 BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT REPORT INTRODUCTION LSA Associates, Inc. (LSA) is conducting a biological assessment for proposed Tentative Tract 14475 as an update to the biological report previously prepared for the project. The 113.2-acre site is located in Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, at the northwestern edge of the city in the community of San Antonio Heights. The mouth of Cucamonga Creek transects the western half of the site as it exits the foothills on the southern edge of the San Gabriel Mountains. The northern border of the site abuts the Angeles National Forest. Topography on site is hilly and extremely steep in spots (especially along the flanks of the creek), but is mostly characterized by a rather fiat bench above the east side of creek. The biological assessment of the Rancho Cucamonga site included focused surveys for sensitive species, an analysis of landscape-level and regional issues related to the proposed project, qualitative descriptions of vegetation, and a compilation of a list of species detected. The previous biological assessment and Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (EIR) prepared for the project by Michael Brandman Associates was used as a basis for the current evaluation of project impacts. METHODS LSA conducted focused surveys for the California gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica · californica) and the San Bernardino Merriam's kangaroo rat (Dipodomys merriami parvus), performed a general biological assessment, and reviewed available literature pertaining to the site (including a review of soil types and of past site assessments). Surveys for the California gnatcatcher were conducted by Michael A. Patten. They were started near sunrise and lasted as late as 1110 PDT. Surveys were conducted during good weather conditions (e.g., no high winds, no rain) every other week from August through December 1998. They took between 4 and 4~A hours to complete. ! Surveys for this threatened bird species involved carefully checking available coastal ~ sage scrub habitat while listening and watching for any sign of the species. Surveys for the San Bernardino Merriam's kangaroo rat were conducted by Richard A. Erickson in September 1998. Surveys consisted of setting 300 Sherman live traps in a grid throughout available alluvial scrub habitat along Cucamonga Creek on five consecutive nights. All animals captured were identified to species, sexed, measured, and released at the site of capture. Focused surveys for the California gnatcatcher and the San Bernardino Merriam's kangaroo rat were performed under authority of U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service permit #PRT777965. 1/8/99<(R:\wt1830\final_repon.complete>> LSA Associates, Inc. List of all plant and wildlife species observed are included in Appendix A. Sensitive species known from the region are addressed in Appendix B. VEGETATION The Rancho Cucamonga site supports three vegetation communities, chaparral, coastal sage scrub, and alluvial scrub. There are also small patches of non-native, weedy vegetation of slightly disturbed nature scattered throughout the site, mostly along existing roadways. This ruderal vegetation is characterized by non-native annual grass species, such as red brome (Bromus madritensis), foxtail fescue (Vulpia royufos), ripgut grass (B. diandrus), and oats (Avena spp.). There is also a prevalence of weedy forbs, such as telegraph weed (Heterotheca grandiflora) and short-pod mustard (Hirschfeldia incana). Both chaparral and coastal sage scrub on site are vegetation types dominated by shrubs, but they differ dramatically in structure and floristic composition. In particular, chaparral has a higher degree of ground cover by shrubs, consists of taller plants, and supports a substantially higher proportion of chamise (Adenostoma fasciculatum), a shrub species nearly synonymous with chaparral in the California floristic province. By contrast, coastal sage scrub supports shrubs lower in stature. It is a more open vegetation type that supports a higher percentage of grass cover and a higher ground cover of California buckwheat (En'ogonurnfasciculatum), white sage (Salvia apiana), California sagebrush (Artimesia californica), pine-bush (Ericameria pinifolia), and black sage (S. mellifera), five species characteristic of this habitat throughout southern California. Alluvial scrub is similar to coastal sage scrub in floristic composition, but occurs only on alluvial fans or in washes with a periodic flood regime. Alluvial scrub on site supports much California buckwheat and California sagebrush. It is even more open than coastal sage scrub and additionally supports Scalebroom (Lepidosparturn squamatum), a shrub species nearly diagnostic of alluvial scrub in southern California. CALIFORNIA GNA TCA TCHER The nominate subspecies of the California gnatcatcher is a small, drably-colored insectivorous songbird endemic to cismontane southern California (Mellink and Rea 1994, cf. Atwood 1988, 1991). This species occurs almost exclusively in coastal sage scrub habitat (Woods 1949, Atwood 1980, Roach 1989, Mock et al. 1990, Bontrager 1991), generally below 2,000 feet in altitude (Atwood and Bolsinger 1992). Because of the small population size, estimated at around 2,000 pairs in southern California (Atwood 1980, 1990), and limited extent of remaining coastal sage scrub habitat (Atwood 1990, 1993), the California Gnatcatcher recently was listed as Endangered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) (Salata 1993). Coastal sage scrub supporting California gnatcatchers in western Riverside and southwestern San Bernardino counties (M. A. Patten pers. obs.) is typically dominated by California sagebrush, California buckwheat, brittlebush (Encelia farinosa), white sage, and 1/8/99(( R:\wt1830\final_report-complete)) 2 LSA Associate& Inc. yellow bush-penstemon (Keckellia antirrhinoides). Furthermore, they tend to occur in areas of modest slope and with few rock outcrops (M. A. Patten pers. ohs.). Coastal sage scrub habitat on the Rancho Cucamonga site is marginally suitable for the California Gnatcatcher in terms of both physiognomy and floristic composition. If anything, this habitat on site is too dense for the gnatcatcher, and is perhaps at too high an elevation (Atwood and Bolsinger 1992). The dense coastal sage scrub dominated by buckwheat, sagebrush, sage, and pine-bush on the flat bench occupying the bulk of the southeastern portion of the site is perhaps the best available habitat. Recent records for southwestern San Bernardino County are scarce (Davis et al. 1998), with the closest geographically being at the Eftwanda fan in Rancho Cucamonga in 1994. Gnatcatchers at that site occupied dense coastal sage scrub below 2,300 feet. Focused gnatcatcher surveys were conducted in the fall following breeding activities (Woods 1949, Atwood 1990, Patten and Campbell 1994), so any California gnatcatchers present should have been fairly easy to detect (M. A. Patten pers. ohs.). Two species of "sensitive" Emberizid sparrow species were detected on site, the Ashy rufous-crowned sparrow (Aimo£hila ruficeps canescerts) and the Bell's sage sparrow (Amphispiza belli belli), both of which are typical of coastal sage scrub in western Riverside County and southwestern San Bernardino County. However, no California gnatcatchers were detected on the Rancho Cucamonga site. Thus, the California gnatcatcher is currently absent from the Rancho Cucamonga project site. SAN BERNARDINO MERRIAM'S KANGAROO RAT The San Bernardino Merriam's kangaroo rat was recently Emergency Listed as Endangered by the USFWS. Its range is nearly confined to southwestern San Bernardino County, where it shows an especially high affinity for alluvial scrub habitat (McKernan 1993), and particularly sites with modest vegetation cover and open, sandy areas for foraging (M. A. Patten pets. ohs.). The population size of this species is unknown, but it probably numbers fewer than 2,000 individuals. So far as known, it is active year-round although it may show reduced activity (or even partial hiberna- tion) during periods of extreme cold weather. Alluvial scrub habitat on site is suitable for this species, especially along the lower reaches of Cucamonga Creek just north of the southerly project boundary where the vegetation is dense enough and there is much open sand. Trapping efforts for this species were focused in that area. No Merriam's kangaroo rats were trapped during any of the surveys. The nearest known recent occurrence is in alluvial scrub in the Day Creek channel in 1996 (R. L. McKernan pets. comm.), several miles to the east on the eastern edge of Rancho Cucamonga. This species is currently considered absent from the Rancho Cucamonga project site. 1/8/99((R:\wt1830\final_report-complete >) 3 LSA A~sociates, LANDSCAPE-LEVEL AND REGIONAL IMPACTS The project site adjoins the Angeles National Forest, and thus a substantial amount of basically unspoiled open space. Although there is a significant amount of relatively undisturbed vegetation on the site, it is bordered to the south by extensive suburban development, with some of this development also encroaching to the east. Thus, it is unlikely that this peninsula of habitat on the southeastern bench will be an effective refugium or corridor for wildlife movement. The Cucamonga Creek drainage provides the only realistic wildlife movement corridor on the site, as it travels from the national forest in the north through suburbia to various islands of natural vegetation in the south. Although much of the creek is channelized or otherwise developed throughout its length, it likely still functions as an effective corridor. Much of the Rancho Cucamonga region, as with elsewhere in the Inland Empire .and indeed throughout cismontane southern California, has experienced extensive development and concomitant habitat fragmentation. Development of this project site will contribute to this cumulative effect, further reducing the amount of natural habitat available to our native flora and fauna. PROJECT IMPACTS SIGNIFICANCE CRITERIA Significance criteria, reflecting the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines are important for the clear identification of potential project impacts. · CEQA identifies project impacts that constitute significant effects on the environment. With respect to biological resources, Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines identifies the following impacts that are normally considered to be significant: · Impacts that substantially affect a rare or endangered species of animal or plant or the habitat of the species. · Impacts that interfere substantially with the movement of any resident or migratory fish or wildlife species. · Impacts that substantially diminish habitat for fish, wildlife, or plants. Section 15380 of the CEQA Guidelines provides a definition of rare or endangered species that is summarized as follows: "Species" as used in this subsection means a species or subspecies of animal or plant or a variety of plant. Plants or animals already listed by a government agency (California Depart- ment of Fish and Game and/or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service) as being rare, threatened, or endangered shall be presumed rare or endangered for purposes I/8/99((R:\wt1830\final_report-complete)) 4 LSA Associates, Inc'. of CEQA. The section also provides that a plant or animal may be treated as rare or endangered even if it has not been listed by a government agency if it can be shown that the species meets the criteria for such listing. Section 15382 of the CEQA Guidelines provides the following definition: "Significant effect on the environment" means a substantial, or potentially substantial, adverse change in any of the physical conditions within the area affected by the project including land, air, water, minerals, flora, fauna, ambient noise, and objects of historic or aesthetic significance. The previous biological assessment concluded that the project would result in the loss of 58 acres of coastal sage scrub and 23 acres of chaparral that would be directly impacted by project construction or by modifications within individual lots subse- quently made by project residents. It was concluded that there would be no adverse impacts to sensitive plants and that impacts to the San Diego horned lizard would include an incremental, but not significant, loss of potential habitat. It was concluded that other sensitive species potentially occurring within Cucamonga Wash would not be impacted by the project (as Cucamonga Wash would be retained intact). Since the proposed project is essentially unchanged from that analyzed in the previous biological assessment report, the extent of impacts are also unchanged. About 58 acres of coastal sage scrub and 23 acres of chaparral will be removed during project construction, alluvial scrub habitat within Cucamonga Wash will be preserved intact. Focused surveys to date have found no listed threatened or endangered species on the site and none are expected to be present. Cucamonga Creek is a potential wildlife corridor (or habitat linkage) and it is expected that this value will be retained under the proposed project. For the purposes of specifically assessing project impacts in the context of the significance criteria identified above: The project will not substantially affect a rare [threatened] or endangered species of animal or plant or the habitat of the species. This conclusion is based on the results of focused biological surveys that have determined that neither the California gnatcatcher nor the San Bernardino kangaroo rat are present on the site nor does either species use the habitat of the site. Further, other sensitive species either do not meet the definition (CEQA Guidelines Section 15380) of a rare or endangered species or, are considered to have such a low potential for occurrence on the site that the project would not be expected to result in impacts to the species. The project will not interfere substantially with the movement of any resident or migratory fish or wildlife species. With the exception of Cucamonga Creek, habitat on the site is essentially a peninsula and thus, is not an effective wildlife movement corridor. Cucamonga Creek may function as a movement corridor and will be retained intact. Project impacts to coastal sage scrub (loss of 58 acres) may be considered significant as this loss may substantially diminish habitat for wildlife and plants. Although no listed species are present on the site, coastal sage scrub is considered a sensitive habitat I/8/99((R:~wt1830\final_report-complete~') 5 LSA .Associates, Inc. type. Further, as is reflected by the attached species list and sensitive species table, the site supports a diverse assemblage of wildlife and plants and is, therefore, considered to be high quality habitat. Thus, impacts of the proposed project to habitat (i.e., coastal sage scrub) may be considered significant. MITIGATION MEASURES The CEQA Guidelines require mitigation only for impacts considered to be significant. Therefore, mitigation measures may be necessary only for potential project impacts to coastal sage scrub habitat. Mitigation for impacts to coastal sage scrub could be accomplished through one, or a combination of, the following measures. Avoid impacts to coastal sage scrub. This measure would require preserving all coastal sage scrub on site. Given the scope of the proposed project, this measure would probably not be feasible. Minimize impacts to coastal sage scrub. This measure would require preserving a substantial portion of the coastal sage scrub on site. Given the scope of the proposed project, this measure would also probably not be feasible. Provide alternate or substitute resources. This measure could include preservation of other habitats on the site (i.e., the alluvial fan scrub within Cucamonga Creek and coastal sage scrub and chaparral on the adjoining banks) and off-site purchase of habitat to replace impacted coastal sage scrub habitat. Suitable locations for purchase may be within the North Eftwanda Preserve area. An appropriate replacement ratio for mitigation would depend on the value of the potential replacement site. It could be appropriate to acquire mitigation lands at a less than 1:1 ratio if the replacement lands are high value coastal sage scrub, support sensitive species, and are in a location that would facilitate management for associated habitat values (i.e., adjoining an existing preserve or linking preserved but disjunct habitat areas). As an alternative to direct purchase of lands, project impacts could be mitigated through a contribution towards regional multi-species habitat conservation efforts. I/8/99((R:\wt1830\final_repon-completO) 6 LSA Associates, Inc. LITERATURE CITED American Ornithologists' Union. 1998. Check-List of North American Birds, 7th edn. Am. Ornithol. Union, Lawrence, Kansas. Atwood, J.L. 1980. The United States distribution of the California Black-tailed Gnatcatcher. West. Birds 11:65-78. Atwood, J.L. 1988. Speciation and geographic variation in black-tailed gnatcatchers. Ornithol. Monogr. 42. Atwood, J.L. 1990. Status review of the California Gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica). Manomet Bird Observatory, P.O. Box 1770, Manomet, Mass. 02345. Atwood, J.L. 1991. Subspecies limits and geographic patterns of morphological variations in California Gnatcatchers (Polioptila californica). Bull. South. Calif. Acad. Sci. 90:118-133. Atwood, J.L. 1992. A maximum estimate of the California Gnatcatcher's population size in the United States. West. Birds 23:1-9. Atwood, J.L. 1993. California Gnatcatchers and coastal sage scrub: The biological basis for endangered species listing. Pp. 149-169 in Keeley, J.C., ed. Interface between ecology and land development in southern California. South. Calif. Acad. Sci., Los Angeles. Atwood, J.L., and J.S. Bolsinger. 1992. Elevational distribution of California Gnatcatchers in the United States. J. Field Ornithol. 63: 159-168. Beauchamp, R.M. 1986. A flora of San Diego County. Sweetwater Press, National City, Calif. Bontrager, D.R. 1991. Habitat requirements, home range and breeding biology of the California Gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica) in south Orange County, California. Unpubl. rep.; copy in Van Tyne Library, Univ. Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich. 48109. Davis, L. H., R. L. McKernan, and J. S. Burns. 1998. History and status of the California Gnatcatcher in San Bernardino County, California. West. Birds 29:361-365. Hickman, J.C., ed. 1993. The Jepson Manual: Higher plants of California. Uniw Calif. Press, Berkeley. Laudenslayer, W.F., Jr., W.E. Grenfell, Jr., and D.C. Zeiner. 1991. A check-list of the amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals of California. Calif. Fish and Game 77: 109-141. 1/8/99((R:\wt1830\final_report-complete)) ': LSA Associates, Inc. McKernan, R. L. 1993. San Bernardino Merriam's Kangaroo Rat. In Brylski, P., ed. Biology and management of southern California rodents. San Bernardino Co. Museum, Redlands, Calif. Mellink, E., and A.M. Rea. 1994. Taxonomic status of the California Gnatcatchers of northwestern Baja California, Mexico. West. Birds 25:50-62. Mock, P.J., B.L. Jones, M. Grishaver, J. Konecny, and D. King. 1990. Home range size and habitat preferences of the California Gnatcatcher in San Diego County. Abstract, Am. Ornithol. Union/Cooper Ornithol. Soc. joint meeting, Univ. Calif., Los Angeles, 25-30 June 1990. Patten, M.A., and K.F. Campbell. 1994. Late nesting of the California Gnatcatcher. West. Birds 25:110-111. Roach, J.D. 1989. The influence of vegetation structure and arthropod abundance on the reproductive success of California Black-tailed Gnatcatchers Polioptila californica californica. M.Sc. Thesis, San Diego State Univ., San Diego. Salata, L. 1993. Endangered and Threatened wildlife and plants; determination of Threatened status for the coastal California Gnatcatcher. Fed. Reg. 58:16742- 16757. Woods, R.S. 1949. Polioptila melanura californica Brewster: Black-tailed Gnatcatcher. Pp. 374-381 in Bent, A.C., ed. Life histories of North American thrushes, kinglets, and their allies. U.S. Natl. Mus. Bull. 196. /8/99<(R:\wt1830\final_report-complete)) 8 1.5.-I .&gsociates. Inc. APPENDIX A - SPECIES LIST LSA Axsociates, Inc. APPENDIX A - SPECIES LIST The following list includes all plant and animal species detected on the Rancho Cucamonga project site during field surveys by LSA Associates. Taxonomy and nomenclature for plant species follows Hickman (1993), with many of the common names taken from Beauchamp (1986). Taxonomy and nomenclature for vertebrate species follows Laudenslayer et al. (1991), as updated for birds by the American Ornithologists' Union (1998). An asterisk indicates that a species is not native to California. DICOT FLOWERING PLANTS Amaranthaceae Amaranths * Amaranthus albus White Tumbleweed Anacardiaceae Sumacs Malosma laurina Laural Sumac Rhus ovata Sugar Bush Toxicodendron diversilobum Poison Oak Asclepiadaceae Milkweeds Asclepias californica California Milkweed Asteraceae Sunflowers Ambrosia acanthacarpa Burweed Ambrosia psilostachya Western Ragweed Artemisia californica California Sagebrush Artemisia douglasii Mugwort Artemisia dracunculus Taragon Baccharis salicifolia Mulefat * Centaurea melitensis Tocalote Cirsium occidentalius Western Thistle * Cirsium vulgate Bull Thistle Conyza bonariensis Prostrate Conyza Conyza canadensis Mare's Tail Encelia farinosa Brittlebush Ericameria palmeri Palmer's Goldenbush Ericameria pinifolia Pine-Bush Eriophyllum confertifiorum Golden Yarrow Hazardia squarrosa Saw-tooth Goldenbush Helianthus annuus Western Sunflower Helianthus gracilentis Hispid Sunflower Heterotheca grandifiora Telegraph Weed Lessingia filaginifolia Cudweed Aster Malacothrix californica Dandelion Stephanomeria virgata Twiggy Wreathplant * Xanthium strumarium Cocklebur 1/8/99<(R:Xwt1830\final_report-complete)) A- l LSA Associates, Inc. Boraginaceae Borages Amsinckia menziesii Rancher's Fiddleneck Heliotropium curassavicum Salt Heliotrope Brassicaceae Mustards * Hirschfeldia incana Short-pod Mustard * Sisymbrium altissimum Tumble Mustard Caprifoliaceae Honeysuckles Sambucus mexicana Mexican Elderberry Chenopodiaceae Saltbushs Atriplex canescens Four-winged Saltbush * Chenopodium album Lamb's Quarters Chenopdium californicum California Chenopod * Salsola tragus Russian Thistle Convoivulaceae .Morning-glories Calystegia macrostegia Finger-leaf Morning-glory Cucurbitaceae Gourds, Melons Cucurbitafoetidissima Coyote Melon Marah macrocarpus Wild Cucumber Euphorbiaceae Spurges Chamaesyce albomarginata Rattlesnake Weed Croton californicus California Croton Eremocarpus setigerus Doveweed Fabaceae Peas Lotus scoparius Deerweed Lupinus excubitus Bush Lupine * Medicago hispida Bur-Clover * Melilotus indicus White Sweet-Clover Fagaceae Oaks Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak Geraniaceae Geraniums · * Erodium cicutarium Red-stemmed Filaree Hydrophyilaceae Waterleafs Eriodictyon trichocalyx Yerba Santa Phacelia ramosissima Branching Phacelia 1/8/99((R:\wt1830\final_report-complete)) A-2 LSA Associates, Inc. Lamiaceae Mints, Sages * Marrubium vulgare Horehound Salvia apiana White Sage Salvia mellifera Black Sage Trichostema lanceolatum Vinegar Weed Malvaceae Mallows Malacothamnusfasciculatus Chaparral Bush Mallow * Malva parvifiora Cheeseweed Myrtaceae Myrtles * Eucalyptus camaldulensis River Red Gum Nyctaginaceae Four O'Clocks Mirabills californica California Wishbone Bush Onagraceae Evening Primroses Camissonia californica California Suncup Polygonaceae Buckwheats, Docks Eriogonum elongatum Long-stemmed Buckwheat Eriogonumfasciculatum California Buckwheat Portulacaeae Purslanes * Protulaca oleracea Common Putslane Rhamnaceae Buckthorns Rhamnus crocea Redberry Rhamnus ilicifolia Chaparral Redberry Rosaceae Roses Adenostoma fasciculatum Chamise Heteromeles arbutifolia Toyon Scrophulariaceae Figworts, Monkeyflowers Mimulus auramiacus Bush Monkeyflower Solanaceae Nightshades, Tabaccoes Datura wrightii Jimson Weed * Nicotiana glauca Tree Tobacco Solanum douglasii Douglas' Nightshade Sterculiaceae Cacaos Fremontidendron californica Flannel Bush l/8/99(( R:\wt1830\final_report-complete >> A-3 ~A Associate~h:c. MONOCOT FLOWERING PLANTS Liliaceae Lilies, Yuccas Yucca whipplei Spanish Bayonet Poaceae Grasses * Arundo donax Giant Reed * Arena barbara Slender Wild Oat * Avenafatua Wild Oat * Bromus diandrus Ripgut Grass * Bromus hordeaceus Smooth Brome * Bromus madritensis Red Brome * Hordeurn tourinure Barley * Lamarckia aurea Goldentop Leymus condensatus Giant Wild Rye * Schismus barbatus Abu-mashi * Vulpia myuros Foxtail Fescue AMPHIBIANS Hylidae Treefrogs Hyla regilla Pacific Treefrog REPTILES Iguanidae Iguanid Lizards Sceloporus occidentalis Western Fence Lizard Uta stansburiana Side-blotched Lizard Teiidae Whiptails Cnemidophorus tigris Western Whiptail Colubridae Colubrid Snakes Masticophis fiagellum Coachwhip Pituophis melanoleucus Gopher Snake BIRDS Ardeidae Herons Ardea herodias Great Blue Heron Ardea alba Great Egret Cathartidae New World Vultures Cathartes aura Turkey Vulture Accipitridae Kites, Hawks, Eagles Circus cyaneus Northern Harrier Accipiter cooperi Coopefts Hawk Buteo linearas Red-shouldered Hawk Buteojamaicensis Red-tailed Hawk Aquila chrysateos Golden Eagle Falconidae Falcons Falco sparverius American Kestrel l/8/99((R:\wt1830Xfinal_report-complete)) A-4 LSA Associates, Inc, Phasianidae Pheasants, Grouse, Quail Callipepla californica California Quail Columbidae Pigeons, Doves Zenaida macroura Mourning Dove Cuculidae Cuckoos, Roadrunners Geococcyx californianus Greater Roadrunner Apodidae Swifts Aeronautes saxatalis White-throated Swift Trochilidae Hummingbirds Calypte anna Anna's Hummingbird Calypte costae Costa's Hummingbird Picidae Woodpeckers Melanerpes formicivorus Acorn Woodpecker Picoides nuttallii Nuttall's Woodpecker Colaptes aurams cafer Red-shafted Flicker Tyrannidae Tyrant Flycatchers Contopus sordidulus Western Wood-Pewee Sayornis nigricans Black Phoebe Sayornis saya Say's Phoebe Myiarchus cinerascens Ash-throated Flycatcher Tyrannus verticalis Western Kingbird Laniidae Shrikes Lanius ludovicianus Loggerhead Shrike Vireonidae Vireos Vireo gilvus Warbling Vireo Corvidae Jays, Crows, Ravens Aphelocoma californica Western Scrub-Jay Corvus brancyrhynchos American Crow Corvus corax Common Raven i Alaudidae Larks Eremophilus alpestris Horned Lark Hirundinidae Swallows Tachycineta bicolor Tree Swallow Petrochelidon pyrrhonota Cliff Swallow Hirundo rustica Barn Swallow Paridae Chickadees and Titmice ~ Baelophus inornatus Oak Titmouse Aegithalidae Bushtits Psaltriparus minimus Bushtit I/8/99(( R:\wt1830\final_report-complete)> A- 5 LSA Associates, Inc'. Troglodytidae Wrens Salpinctes obsoletus Rock Wren Thryomanes bewickii Bewick's Wren Troglodytes aedon House Wren Regulidae Kinglets Regulus calendula Ruby-crowned Kinglet Sylviliidae Old World Warblers Polioptila caerulea Blue-gray Gnatcatcher Turdidae Thrushes Sialia mexicana Western Bluebird Catharus guttatus Hermit Thrush Turdus migratorius American Robin Timaliidae Babblers Chamaea fasciata Wrentit Mimidae Thrashers Mimus polyglottos Northern Mockingbird Toxostoma redivivum California Thrasher Ptilogonatidae Silky Flycatchers Phainopepla nitens Phainopepla Sturnidae Starlings Sturnus vulgaris European Starling Parulidae New World Warblers Vermivora celata Orange-crowned Warbler Dendroica petechia Yellow Warbler Dendroica coronata auduboni Audubon's Warbler Dendroica nigricans Black-throated Gray Warbler Geothlypis trichas Common Yellowthroat Wilsonia pusilla Wilson's Warbler Emberizidae New World Sparrows Pipdo maculatus Spotted Towhee Pipilo crissalis California Towhee Aimophila ruficeps Rufous-crowned Sparrow Passerculus sandwhichensis Savannah Sparrow Amphispiza belli Sage Sparrow Melospiza melodia Song Sparrow Melospiza lincolnii Lincoln's Sparrow Zonotrichia leucophrys gambelii Gambe!'s White-crowned Sparrow Cardinalidae Cardinals, Grosbeaks, Buntings Pheucticus melanocephalus Black-headed Grosbeak Passerina amoena Lazuli Bunting I/8/99((R:\wt1830\final_report-complete>) A-6 L~A Associates, Inc. Icteridae Blackbirds and Orioles Agelaius phoeniceus Red-winged Blackbird Euphagus cyanocephalus Brewer's Blackbird Molothrus ater Brown-headed Cowbird lcterus bullockii Bullock's Oriole Icterus parisorum Scott's Oriole Fringillidae Finches Carpodacus mexicanus House Finch Carduelis psaltria Lesser Goldfinch MAMMALS Leporidae Rabbits, Hares Lepus californicus Black-tailed Jackrabbit Sylvilagus audubonii Audubon's Cottontail Sciuridae Squirrels Spermophilus beecheyi California Ground Squirrel Geomyidae Pocket Gophers Thomomys bottae Botta's Pocket Gopher Heteromyidae Pocket Mice, Kangaroo Rats Dipodomys agilis Pacific Kangaroo Rat Cricetidae Mice, Woodrats, Voles Reithrodontomys megalotis Western Harvest Mouse Peromyscus eremicus Cactus Mouse Peromyscus maniculatus Deer Mouse Peromyscus californicus California Mouse Neotoma lepida Desert Woodrat Canidae Dogs, Wolves, Foxes Urocyon cinereoargenteus Gray Fox Canis latrans Coyote Procyonidae Raccoons Procyon lotor Raccoon Mustelidae Weasels, Skunks, Badgers Mephitis mephi~is Striped Skunk Felidae Cats Felis rufus Bobcat Cervidae Elk, Deer, Caribou Odocoileus hemionus Mule Deer l/8/99<<R:\wt1830\final_report-comolete)) A-7 L~L4 Associates, Inc. APPENDIX B - SENSITIVE SPECIES TABLE RECEIVED JAN ! 1 ~ City of Rant, b3 Cucamorlga P~amng I/8/99((R:\wt1830\final_report-compictO) I~A Associates. Inc. APPENDIX B - SENSITIVE SPECIES TABLE Sensitive species are those plants and animals occurring or potentially occurring on the project site that are endangered or rare, as those terms are used by CEQA and its Guidelines, or are of current local, regional or State concern. Plant communities are considered to be sensitive biological resources based on 1) federal, State or local laws regulating their development, 2) limited distributions, and/or 3) the habitat requirements of sensitive plant~s or animals occurring on the site. Legal protection for sensitive species varies widely, from the relatively comprehensive protection extended to listed threatened/endangered species to no legal status at present. The California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), local agencies, and special interest groups such as the California Native Plant Society (CNPS) publish watch lists of declining species; these lists often describe the general nature and perceived severity of the decline. In addition, recently published findings and preliminary results of ongoing research provide a basis for consideration of species that are candidates for State and/or federal listing. Finally.. species that are clearly not rare or threatened statewide or regionally, but whose local populations are sparse, rapidly dwindling or otherwise unstable, may be considered to be of "local interest." The following table provides a summary of information regarding the species identified from literature sources as occurring in the project vicinity. [. ACTIVITY STATUS SPECIES HABITAT AND DISTRIBUTION PERIOD DESIGNATION OCCURRENCE PROBABILITY PLANTS Plummer's mar- Dry, rocky places, often in brash, May - July US: * Moderate: Suitable habitat exists iposa lily below 5,000 feet elevation. Usually CA: ND on site, none detected during sur- on granitic soils. Found in grassland, CNPS: List lB veys. Calochortus chaparral, coastal sage scrub, yellow plummerae pine forest. Santa Monica Mts to , San Jacinto Mts. Riverside, San Bernardino, Los Angeles and Ventura Cos. Parry's Sandy openings in coastal sage scrub April - June US: * Moderate. Loose, sandy soils are spineflower and chaparral, 900 to 3,500 feet ele- CA: ND on the site in coastal sage scrub. vation; east Los Angeles County to CNPS: List 3 Chorizanthe San Gorgonio Pass and west River- parryi var. side County. parryi t Slender-horned Sandy and gravelly soils of April - June US: END Very Low. Habitat on site (within · spineflower floodplains often on alluvial fans; CA: END Cucamonga Creek channel) may be 500 to 2,000 feet elevation. Los CNPS: List lB suitable, nearest known locations Dodecahema Angeles, Riverside, and San are about 15 miles away; a spring leptoceras Bernardino counties. survey would be necessary for a conclusive determination. Many-stemmed Often on clay soils also around gra- May - July US: * Absent. Clay soils are not present dudleya nitic outcrops in chaparral, coastal CA: ND and no granitic rock outcrops on sage scrub, and grassland; below CNPS: List lB site. Dudleya 2,500 feet elevation. Los Angeles, multicaulis Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, and San Diego counties. I/8/99((R:\wt1830\final_report-complete)) B- l LSA Associates. Inc ACTIVITY STATUS SPECIES HABITAT AND DISTRIBUTION PERIOD DESIGNATION OCCURRENCE PROBABILITY Santa Ana River Perennial sub-shrub found in alluvial Year-round US: END Absent. No suitable habitat and woolly star fan sage scrub and coastal sage scrub CA: END outside known range. habitats on alluvial deposits along CNPS: List lB Eriastrum the Santa Ana River, San Bernardino densifolium vat. County. sanctorum Pious daisy Chaparral and lower coniferous tBr-. May - US: * Absent. No suitable chaparral hab- est of the San Gabriel and San September CA: ND itat; on lower edge of elevational Erigeron breweri Bernardino mountains; this subspe- CNPS: List lB range. vat. bisanctus cies known only from Los Angeles and San Bernardino counties; open dry slopes and washes; 1,000 to 4,500 feet elevation. Pringle's Presumed extinct. Previously known May - June US: * Very low. Loose soils are found monardella from only two locations in vicinity CA: ND on site, but no individuals of this of Colton; habitat requirements are CNPS: List iA species were noted. Monardella described as sandy places in coastal pringlei sage scrub. California Sandy soils in coastal sage scrub and March - US: ND Low: Habitat on site may have ap- spineflower chaparral, below 4,500 feet eleva- August CA: ND pears suitable no known records of tion; central western and southwest- CNPS: List 4 species from within five-mile ra- [ Mucronea ern California dius of site. californica California Streambanks, canyons, and other July - US: * Very Low: No suitable moist habi- muhly moist sites in chaparral, coastal sage September CA: ND tat exists on site. scrub, coniferous forest, and mead- CNPS: List lB Muhlenbergia ows; 500 to 6,000 feet elevation: caifornica San Gabriel, San Bernardino, and San Jacinto mountains · INVERTEBRATES Quino Meadows or openings within coastal January - US: END Absent. Site is outside known checkerspot but- sage scrub or chaparral where foot late April CA: ND range of species. terfiy plants (Plantago erecta and/or Orthocarpus purpurascens) are pres- Euphydryas ent. Historically known from Santa etitha quino Monica Mountains to northwest Baja California; currently known only from southwestern Riverside County, southern San Diego County, , and northern Baja California. Delhi sands Fine, sandy soils, often with wholly Above- US: END Absent. No Delhi sands habitat is flower-loving fly or partially consolidated dunes. ground CA: ND present on site. These soil types are generally classi- emergence Rhaphiomidas fled as the ~Delhi" series (primarily August and terminatus Delhi fine sand). Restricted to west- Sept. Not abdominalis ern Riverside and San Bernardino visible dur- counties. ing the rest of the year l/8/99((R:\wt1830\final_report-complctc)) B-2 I~A Associates, Inc'. ACTIVITY STATUS SPECIES HABITAT AND DISTRIBUTION PERIOD DESIGNATION OCCURRENCE PROBABILITY REPTILES San Diego Often associated with rocks. Coastal Nocturnal. US: * Moderate. Project site has rocks banded gecko sage scrub and chaparral, most often April - CA: CSC and rock piles on the surface; spe- on granite or rocky outcrops in these October. cies was not observed during the Coleonyx habitats. Interior Ventura Co. survey. variegatus south. abbottii San Diego Wide variety of habitats including April - July US: * High. Habitat on site appears suit- horned lizard coastal sage scrub, grassland, ripar- with re- CA: CSC able. ian woodland; typically on or near duced Phrynosoma loose sandy soils; coastal and inland activity coronaturn areas from Ventura County to Baja August - blainvillei California. October Orange-throated Floodplains and terraces with peren- March - US: * Absent: Site is outside known whiptail nial plants and open areas nearby; July with CA: CSC range of species; nearest known sea level to 3,000 feet elevation; in~. reduced record is about 12 miles south of Cnemidophorus land and coastal valleys of River- activity site. hyperthrus side, Orange, and San Diego coun- August - beMingi ties (all records from south of Santa October Aria River) to Baja California. Silvery legless Mountain ranges and coastal slope of Year-round US: * Low. Loose soil found on site in lizard southern California and northwest with only CA: CSC Cucamonga Creek. Baja California; southern Sierra Ne- brief peri- Anniella pulchra vada; and some desert-edge Iocali- ods of win- pulchra ties. ter inactiv- ity. Coastal Rosy Rocky shrub land areas of desert, Active noc- US: * Low. Marginal habitat exists on boa chaparral and coastal sage habitats. turnally CA: ND site Attracted to water sources such as throughout Lichanura permanent and intermittent streams, most of the trivirgata but does not require permanent wa- year. rosafusca ter. Restricted to southwestern Cali- tbrnia and northern Baja California. Coast patch- Coastal chaparral, washes, sandy Active US: * Moderate. Habitat exists on site nosed snake flats and rocky areas. Widely dis- diurnally CA: CSC tributed throughout lowlands, up to throughout Salvadora 7,000 feet of Southern California most of the hexalepis from coast to the eastern border. year virgultea BIRDS SwainsoWs Grassland and agricultural areas; Spring & US: * Low. Species passes through re- hawk large trees for nesting. Breeds and Fall (in CA: THR gion during migration; could forage nests in western North America; migration) on site. Buteo swainsoni winters in South America; in Cali- fornia restricted to Central Valley, Modoc Plateau, and Great Basin. Western bur- Grasslands and rangelands, usually Year-round US: * Absent: Not detected during fo- rowing owl occupying ground squirrel burrows. CA: CSC cused survey for avian species. Resident over most of Southern Call- Athene fornia. Found in agricultural crop cunicularia land areas. hypugea I/8/99(~ R:\wt1830\final_report-complete)) B- 3 ACTIVITY STATUS SPECIES HABITAT AND DISTRIBUTION PERIOD DESIGNATION OCCURRENCE PROBABILITY Vaux's swift Transient throughout Southern Cali- Spring and US: * High. Probably occurs as a mi- fbrnia. Can occur almost every- fall CA: CSC grant, but no suitable breeding hab- Chaetura vauxi where. itat occurs. California yel- Riparian woodlands of coastal low- Year-round US: * Absent: Suitable breeding habitat low warbler land and foothill canyons and across diurnal CA: CSC (nest- (riparian woodland) is not present the foothills of the Transverse activity. ing habitat) on site. Dendroica pete- ranges. Riparian areas are exclu- Nocturnal chia moreoral; sively used for nesting. Migrants migrant includes D.p. are widespread and common. brewsteri Patchily distributed throughout Southern California. California Open grasslands and fields, agricul- Year-round US: * Low. Grasslands on site are not horned lark tural area, open montane grasslands. interior (in- CA: CSC extensive, but occasional birds may Southern California common resi- land areas) forage on site. Eremophila dent in interior, common transient alpestris actia and winter visitant along coast, com- mon summer resident. California Coastal sage scrub; occurs only Year-round US: THR (Absent). Not detected on site dur- gnatcatcher cismontane southwestern California CA: CSC ing 8 focused survey visits to date, and Baja California in low- one addtional survey visit to com- Polioptila lying foothills and valleys. plete survey effort. californica californica Loggerhead Open fields with scattered trees, Year-round US: * High. Suitable habitat exists on shrike open woodland, scrub. Fairly corn- CA: CSC site. mon resident throughout Southern Lanius California ludovicianus Ashy rufous- Steep, rocky coastal sage scrub and Year-round US: * Present: Observed in coastal sage crowned open chaparral habitats, particularly diurnal ac- CA: CSC scrub habitat exists on site. sparrow scrubby areas mixed with grass- tivity lands. From Santa Barbara County Aimophila to northwestern Baja California. ruficeps canescens Bell's sage spar- Uncommon to fairly common but Year-round US: * Present: Observed in coastal sage row local resident in dense, dry chaparral diurnal ac- CA: CSC scrub habitat exists on site. in interior foothills along the coast. tivity Amphispiza belli Breeds in low dense chamisal chap- belli arral and in coastal sage scrub. 1/8/99(( R:\wt1830\final_report-complete)) B-4 LSA A.vsociates, Inc. ACTIVITY STATUS SPECIES HABITAT AND DISTRIBUTION PERIOD DESIGNATION OCCURRENCE PROBABILITY MAMMALS California mas- Historically from north-central Call- US: * Low. Potential foraging habitat tiff bat fornia south to northern Baja Call- CA: CSC may be present in cliff face adja- fornia, eastward across the south- cent to Cucamonga Creek; few Eumops perotis western United States, and north- number of crevices makes this habi- californicus western Mexico to west Texas and tat marginal. Coahuila. In California, most re- cords are from rocky areas at low elevations where roosting occurs primarily in crevices. California Occurs from northern Nevada, Nocturnal, US: * Low. Potential foraging habitat leaf-nosed bat Southern California, and western active year- CA: CSC may be present in cliff face adja- Arizona south to southern Baja Call- round cent to Cucamonga Creek; few Macrotus fornia and Sonora. In California pri- number of crevices makes this habi- californicus marily occupies low-lying desert tat marginal. areas roosting in caves, mines, and old buildings. Historic records ex- tend west to near Chatsworth, Los Angeles County, but most popula- tions from the California coastal bas- ins are not believed to have disap- ] peared. San Diego Variety of habitats including grass- Year-round US: * Present: This species was observed black-tailed land, scrub, open forest, and chapar- diurnal, and CA: CSC during the field surveys; uses all jackrabbit ral. Most common in relatively open crepuscular habitats present on the site. habits. Restricted to southern Call- activity Lepus fornia, from the coast to the Santa californicus Monica, San Gabriel, San bennettii Bernardino, and Santa Rosa moun- tain ranges. Los Angeles Prefers sandy soil for burrowing, but Nocturnal. US: * pocket mouse has been found on gravel washes and Active late CA: CSC stony soils. Found in coastal scrub. spring to Perognathus Los Angeles, Riverside, and San 'early fall. longimembris Bernardino counties. brevinasus Northwestern Sandy herbaceous areas, usually Nocturnal, US: * San Diego with rocks or coarse gravel. Arid active year- CA: CSC pocket mouse coastal areas in grassland, coastal round. scrub and chaparral. San Diego, · Chaetodippus San Bernardino, Los Angeles, and fallaxfallax Riverside counties. San Bernardino Gravelly and sandy soils of alluvial Nocturnal, US: C Absent. Not captured on site dur- Merriam's kan- fans, braided river channels, active active year- CA: CSC ing focused trapping survey. garoo rat channels and sandy terraces; San round Bernardino Valley (San Bernardino Dipodomys County) and San Jacinto Valley merriarai parvus (Riverside County). I/8/99(( R:\wt1830\final_report-complete>) B- 5 LSA Associates, Inc. ACTIVITY STATUS SPECIES HABITAT AND DISTRIBUTION PERIOD DESIGNATION OCCURRENCE PROBABILITY Southern Arid habitats, especially scrub habi- Nocturnal, US: * Low. Soils on site are suitable for grasshopper tats with friable soils. Coastal active year- CA: CSC use by this species. mouse scrub, mixed chaparral, sagebrush, round low sage and bitterbrush habitats. Onychornys Arid portions of Southern Califor- torridus ramona nia. San Diego Frequents poorly vegetated arid Year-round US: * desert woodrat lands and is especially associated mainly CA: CSC with cactus patches. Occurs along nocturnal Neotoma le£ida the Pacific slope from about San intermedia Luis Obispo to northwestern Baja California. American Occurs throughout California and the US: * Low. Suitable habitat is present on badger United States. Primary habitat re- CA: SA the project site. No individuals quiremerits seem to be sufficient were observed and no dens were Taxidea taxus food and friable soils in relatively noted. open uncultivated ground in grass- land~ wnndl~nd~, and deserT, Status Designation Def'mitions US: Federal Classifications CA: State Classifications END Taxa listed as Endangered. THR Taxa listed as Threatened. END Taxa State-listed as Endangered. Prop END Taxa proposed to be listed as Endan- THR Taxa State-listed as Threatened. gered. C E State candidate (Endangered). Prop THR Taxa proposed to be listed as Threat- C T State candidate (Threatened). ened. CSC California Species of Special Concern. Refers to taxa with populations declining C Candidate for listing. Refers to taxa for seriously or that are otherwise highly vulnera- which the USFWS has sufficient information ble to human developments. to support a proposal to list as Endangered or SA Special Animal. Refers to taxa of concern to Threatened, issuance of the proposal(s) is the Natural Diversity Data Base regardless of anticipated but, precluded at this time. their legal or protection status. ND Not designated as a sensitive species. · Formerly designated as "Category 2 Candi- date for listing." The U.S. Fish and Wildlife CNPS: California Native Plant Society Service has officially discontinued the multi- Classifications tiered candidate designations in favor of the single "Candidate for listing" designation (see 1B List of plants considered by CNPS to be rare following definition) and, as a result, elimi- or endangered in California and elsewhere. hated these species from candidate status. 2 List of plants considered by CNPS to be rare, However, some Fish and Wildlife Service threatened or endangered in California, but offices are using the unofficial designation which are more common elsewhere. "species of concern" for former Category 2 3 Review list of plants suggested by CNPS for Candidates. consideration as endangered but about which more information is needed. ND Not designated as a sensitive species. 4 Watch list of plants of limited distribution, whose status should be monitored. I/8/99(( R:\wtlg30\final_report-complete)} B-6 ATTORNEY AT LAW ~ol F!RST AVENUE, ,SUITE 3,3,5 SAN DIEGO, CA 92~o'1-2322 IELEPHONE FACSIMILE (619] 702-7892 (61~?) 702-9291 from the Law Office of Craig A. $herm.n Te: C~y Clerk From: Craig Sherman, F_~. Fern (909) 477-2846 Pa~,e~ (im=l.diag =ever): 7 i'lm,m= (909) 477-2700 Date: Febma~ 17, 1999 I~-_ Council Mfg. (Feb 17) ~ Urgent [] For Review [] Piece G. mme~t ~ Pleese Reply [] Pleise Recycle Please distribute to the Mayor and Mem0er of the City Council rebating tc an item on the agenda for tonight's (February 17, 1999) meeting of the City Council. Agenda Item No. (_?) 'ADINI¢11 Of Plannin~l OommMion re:. _Dep_ iel of Time Extension for Tentative Tract 14475- Thank you, [N'I'END~',D gECI'PiE~-' N.~MED ~ IF YOU ~ NOT THE ~ENDED ~P[5~, Y~' ,~ H&K~BY NOY~F[ED ~AT ~Y COP~G OF THIS CC~ICA~ON OR DlSSEM~ATION OR DIS~B~ON OF ~' TO ;~YONE OTHER ~' ~E ~TENDBD R~IPI~ [$ S~I~LY PROHIBIteD- IF Y~' HAI~ ~CEI~D THIS CO~ICA~ON ~ ~O~ PLE.~E IMMEDIA~ZLY N~'IFY THE ~W O~ICE OF C~G ~ SHE~I~ AT THE. ~o~ TE~PHONE NUMAR ~N'D ~'~' TIiE O~O~ XIE~SAGE TO ~ AT THE ~ ADDREg~ ~TA THE UE POST,~ SE~qCE. CRAIG A. SHERMAN ATTORN~,Y ,aT L~.W February 17, 1999 gTa Facsimile Followed By The Honorable Mayor Willian~ Alexander MayoL Cil.y of~cho Cuc~onga 105~ Cite Cen~r Ddve ~n~ht~ Cacmnm~a, CA 91729 Re: C~omments R~eommending Denial of Ap0ea! ,Environmental Assessmut and Time Extension for V~sting_Tentativc Tra~t 14475 -.,Mlard E _nginee_fin~_ (gabams) Dear .Nil'. Mayor and Members of the City Council: Tiffs comment letter is offered on behalf of the public interest group Spirit of the Sage Cormall ("Sage Council") and other interested community groups and petsons in the City of Rancho Cucaunonga anti the western area of the County of San Bernardino. The Sage Comz~il provides this ¢orrml~e,t letter in support of the Plan~g Commission and Planning Staff recommendation that the a~al to the,City Council rec~_.e~Lrt$ a time extension for Tract.MaD 14475 bc denied. ~__rp_ ose of this. ~omment Lette_r Other then merely recommending denial of the above-re. ferenced appe2l~ the,qe comments are provided as an essential and integral part of the California Environmental Quality Act, Cal. Public KeaourceS Code §§ g1000 et ~eq., ("CEQA"). CEQA Ouid~iiae § 15201; Szattcr Sensible Pllgmin~, Inc. v. Board of Su0ervi~xa. 0981) 122 Cal. App.3d 813, 820. The purposes of these comments are specifically and generally intended to (1) share knowledgeable local experti,e, (2) check the accuracy and detect omi.q,qicms of agency and project proponent analysis, (3) disclose public concerns, (4) disclose legal deficiencies and misapplication of local, state and I~deral laws, and (5) ~o solicit ~ttd icvv, mn~nd necessary ooanterpropocal$. CEQA Guideline § 15200; Selmi, The Judicial Developmen,' of the California Environmental Quality Act (1984) 18 UC. Davis Law Review 197, 245; Towards Responsibility in P!anmng v. city Cou. gg~, 0988) 200 Col App.3d 671, 2-! 7- ? 99'.} I 2: 3as>,~ ~~,z.',O~* ;3: !} 702 92.!9: ' P. :~ Page Two - Fcbrmu'y ~ ?~ 1999 City of Rancho C, uc~onga Extension of Time for Tentative Tract Map 144 75 The $a~e Ce.nntii i~ Intimately Aware of Environmental and C..ultural Resources, i..n this _Pp__rt[o~a of the_City where Tea,tative Tract 1447_5 is Located The Sage Council is a grassroots conservation coalition and non-profit project of Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs (SEE, Inc.), located :.n Malibu, CA. Based in Southern Cali¢ornia, the Sage Council was co-founded by the tribal leaders of the indigenous Shoshone- Gabrielinc Nation and currently supports the conservation perspectives and public tm~t iater¢st~ for over 30 conservation organizations throug, hout the United States, Mexico and British Columbia. The Sage Council works r, ooperatively Mth conservation groups, salemists and legal experts throughout the U. $. in proteclang endangered species by applying sound methods of conservation biology (best scientific data}, public education and through the enforcement of land use and conservation laws, ml~, ordinances and regulations. The Sage Council's directors, coordinators and members have been involved with, and have participated in numerous regional conservation planning efforts underway in the counties of' San Diego, Riverside, San Bernardino, Orange, Los Angeles, and Yolo, California since 1990. in addition, the Sage Council works cooperatively with the National Endangered Species Network (NESN) in a~sistlng grassroots conservation organizations throushout the U.S. by providLng review and comment on habitat conservation plans and incidental take permits. The Sage Council has continued, since 1991 to notify jurisdictions throughout the County of San Bernardino of the ecological importance of echoing "public trust" natural resources and lands, esp~oially in the North l~tiwanda area and foothills of the gan l~mardino National Forest. More specifically we have requested that the City of Ranch Cucamonga and surrounding jurisdictions actively conserve the threatened communities of Coastal Sa8~ Scrub including its associated declining sub-populations of Riversidian Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub (RAFSS) and Alluvial Sage Scrub which are critical for the surdval of many rare, threatened and endangered species. The Sage Council has repeatedly requested that th~ r~giomd ~ifi~ ttu'oughout the Cottory, including the City of Rancho Cucamonga ensure the conservation of Cultural Resources of the indigenous Shoshone "CJabridino" Tribe of California Mission Indiana" within their ancestral territory and village of Cucamong(n)a, including land.~ of ethnobotanical significance. and registered or eligible arch¢ological sites It is the intent of the Sage Coundl to provide thorough commcnt~ and ~.c~omm~ndal. iorts to the "r¢sponsibl~" government agencies, including the City of Rancho Cucamonga, to ensure that a decision approving this project complies with all applicable local, State and Federal laws and regulations which protect biological and caflmrnl re.~r~urces. 2-:7-1999 ~2:~5:';~ Se'3~ S~i~ ?02 -i{.¥: Page Three - February 17, 1999 City of Rancho Cucamonga ~_xte~sion of Time for Tentative Tract Map 14475 Bi01o~!_cai Assessment !~ails to,,,4gknowledste Significant .impacts to Rare Soecies The Biological Assessment Report prepared by LSA Associates, Inc. for Tentative Tract 14475 ("BAR") i~ defigiem in many respects. While it is r,cogniz~d in the BAR that significant impacts to habitat may result from the proje~ ("[piteject impacts to coastal sage scrub (loss of 58 acres) may be considered sismile, ant"), this BAR finding barely glosses the mrfac~. when examining the true kno..wn impacts which this ~ro. iexvt will cause. Ci~QA 8,uiddh~c, require a mandatory finding of significance if the proposed project will "reduce the number or restrict the range era rare or endangered plant or animal." What the BAR fails to acknowledge is that the habitat throughout the bluffS, canyons and wat~rway:~ of Tract 14475 provides habitat for many species designated California Species of Special Concern including the Ashy mfous-crowned sparrow, Bell's sage sparrow, San Diego black- tailed jackrabbit, Plummcr's mariposa lily, Parry's splneflower, San Diego banded gecko, Ran Diego horned lizard, Coast patch-nose snake, Vaux's swift and the Loggerhead shrike. County, state and federal resource agencies have ¢ommen~ed that the BAR is d~eient in failing to properly recognize the adverse impact to the above and o~er species, as well as the failure of the project to provide mitigation for such impacts. The need to adequately ag.qess and mitigate the hnpacts to rare and endangered species cannot be understated. In fact, it is the primary purpose of the California l~-nvironmemal Quality Act ("CEQA"), Public Rosourc.~s Code §§ 21000 et seq., that disclosure of environmental effects era project is the heart of the CEQA proczss. The California Supreme Court has repeatedly stated that informed decision- making is a fundamental purpose of the CEQA proc. egs and lhat an agency ~ approve a project if feasible alternatives or mitigation measures are available. ~Rizens of Goleta v. Board f~_..~ (~990) ~2 Cal.3d ~53. The evidence being considered by the Ci¢~ Council is clear that the knowledge and value of the habitat and species Iocat~l in and mound Tract Msp 1447~; ha~q drastically changed since the earlier 1992 approval of the ~xpired Map 14475. Therefore, the granting of an extension without the preparation era subsequent or suppl,:a~mm. al EIR would be a violation of CEQA. A $ub.s.equent or SuDolemental EIR is Re~xuired Due to ~.han~ed Circumstances and N~,,lnfp~ation of $u.~tan~ Imuo~n_ce The facts ~d circum~ces under which Te~afive Tract M~p 14475 is now being ~aken has dr~ically chased ~nce the projcc. t's tarlief approval in 1~2. The law under CEQ& Public ~gources Code. ~ 21166~ as correctly adopted ~d ratified by the Ciw of~cho Cu~onga Page Four - February 17, 1999 City of'Rancho Cucamonga E~ct, nsion of Time for Tentative Trrwt Iv/up 14475 in its Community Development Department, Environmental Guidelines, Section VII.A, requires, pertinent to the facts of this project, that subsequent environmental rex4ew must be conducted, if the City Council finds that (1) there have be~n substantial changes with respect to the circumstances undt:, width the proj¢c~ is undv"rtaketx, or (2) there is ~cw information of substantial importance which could not have been known earli~'. Sections VII. A 1.b and VII.A, 1. c, respectively. It is undoubted that the circumstances in which this project is now being undertaken have drastically cidraged sin~¢ 1992. As idenfific, d in the February 17, 1999 $taffl~port for this project (pp. 4-5), two species known to utilize the habitat on Tra,t Map 14475 have since been listed as threatened or endszger~i species under the redial Endang0red $pexi~ Act. 16 U.S.C. 1531 ¢t seq. The 1992 environmental assessment only id~tified and addressed mitigation impacts for the San Diego horned lizard, whereas now, there are several additional rare animal spedes known or bclicvod to bc occupying the site. (See above discussion.) Furthermore, as admitted by the City in it, }'eldrusty 17, 1999 Staff Pepon, Tentative Tract 14475 now exists in a prime location and possesses high value for multi-species reserve design, which the City of Rancho Cucamonga has committed to conserve, as part of its 1995 agr~mex~t to establish a contiguous land-basod pre~rve ~y~a~m known as the Multi-Slm¢iz~ Habitat Conservation Plan ("MSHCP"). This information was not and could not have previously been known in 1992. '[herefore, subsequent ~vironmental review is now necessary to address the project within the comcxt of significant regional conservation efforts which now stand to be significantly and adversely affected by this project in its current form. Additional comments' on this project, made by th~ San B~rnardino County Mugcure - as of lead agency of' MSHCP - and comments by the state and f~:l~'al resource agencies (CDFG and USFSW), are relevant here and are incorporated by rolerenee. Direct And ~p.,m, ~a~tive lmoacts to National.Forest and O_uen Space I~and A large portion of Tract Map 1447:5 lies within a City of Rancho Cuc, amonga up~m ~pau; district and is a private land in-holding within the San Bernardino National Forest. Notwithstanding legal limitations of developing and subdividing private land within a Congre~ionally delegated "public ~¢oreat," the direct and indirect impae. t.~ t,~ open ~pace and forest lands must be addressed in an ElK. The current proposed development represents further 1o~s of open space and vacant land which act as a buffer to National Forest lands and other sensitive and rare riparian and coastal sage habitats g.dver~ environmental impacts will result from the edge effects of development Page Five - February 17, 1999 City of Rancho Ch.~camonga. Extension of Time for Tentative Tract Map 14475 including fire management clearing zones, the presence of residents and their pets, and other hici,~'~.~---d recreational sc~Jx4ties, which will put additional strains on already rare and sensitive habitat. The quantity and type of rare and threatened coastal r~e habitat which is present on the project site has substantially declined since 1992. The development of Tract Map 14475 repr¢scms an additional destruction of limited remaining high qu~ity coas~a! ,age habitat in the City ofP,.ancho Cucamonga and greater cotmtv area. Cultural Resour_¢...es The reliance on previous cultural resource studies is Ihulty and inadequate. The Sage Council requests that a complete Phase 11 Test Frogram and Cultural Resources Report be prepared, that includes the oral history. ofthe IXOjeCt site and area by the State Most Likely Gabfielino Descendant, Chief Ya'anna, Vera Rocha. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has been previously made aware of the cultural significance ofthi, area, that is within the eastern portion of the prehistoric village site ofCueamong(n)a. I'he area is also a within a significant "cultural lanctscape" (see U.S. Depan. ment of the Interior, National Park Service, National Register Bulletin 30: C_midelines for Evaluation and DocumentinS Rural Historic Land,capes). The California Register Bill (A~ :2881) defined a "substantial adverse effect" on a. hi~t. oric resource as "an effect that may change the ~ignifican~e of the resource," Public Resources Code §§ 5020. I(Q), 21084.1, and a "substantial adverse change in the si~fifi -~ut~ o£a historical resource is a significant effect on the environment" Public Resources Code § 21084.1). Per AB 2881, an "historical resource" is one listed or eligible for listing on the California Re~ister of I-Iistoriaal Resources. Public Resources Code § 5024.1 (a) AR 2881 a/so establish~ a presumption of significance unless proven otherwise: "locally sign/ficant resources are presumed :o be signific~t unless the prc*ponderanc~ o£ [Itc ~vidvnc¢ demonstrates that it is not historic~ly or culturally significant." Public Resources Code § 21084.1. For CEQA documents to be complete they must contain a discussion of'the cultural and archeological r~somccs i~ ~s~ait, aad a discussion how th~D, will be imp&¢te..d by the proposed development. _Public Resources Code §§ 21060.5, 21083.2; Cal. Admin. Code tit. 14, §1500 Appendices O(j), K. The proposed project and its supporting documents is severely lacking in its attention to these requirements. The legislature, in drafting CEQA clem'ly intended that Page Six - February 17, !999 City off Rancho Cucamonga E~ctension of Time for .Tentative Tract Map 144 75 histwical sitos of all ~ort, be protected, and be treat~-,d as part of the ~nvironmcnt, worthy of consideration. Cal. Admin. Code fit. 14 § 15000 Appendix G(j)(w), An ancient, time honored Native American traditional practice c~ntmues to the present day in the North Eftwanda and West Valley Foothills area and the area in and around Cucamonga Canyon. All national and state rc$istx~/sites must be fully disclosed and evaluated as part of the C.!~QA process before the City of Rancho Cucamonga may take discretionary action to allow and approve development of Tentative Tract I447~ by revalidating the time in which to eomm~ce this development. Final Re, marks The Sage Council appreciates your eonsideratio~ ofils concerns as presented in this conu~neu~t letter relating to Tentative Tract 14475. Should you have any questions concerning any of the points raised herein, ple~ do not h~si~t~ to contact this office. Pl~se notify this office of any administrative or legislative hearings anti actions, anti d~erminations made theefrom, which are taken or made in the hture related to this Project. Craig At S~rman ...... Ray Allard A!lard Engineering 6101 Cherry Avenue Fontana CA 92336 ~: ' ' Subject: Coastal Sage Scrub Mitigation for Prakash Sakraney : Development Project - TM 14475 : , ,~, :,. DearRav: ". Per our meeting on Wednesday, February 3, 1999, off-site mitigation ~vas proposed for "': the impact to coastal sage scrub (CSS) due to the development of TM 14475. Three · ':' parcels~ west of TM 14475 were offered as potential mitigation sites for the preserva- ..~.,; ....... tion of CSS habitat (Figures 1 and 2). These parcels are located within San Bernardino · ........... County, and are adjacent to private and federal properties. The proposed TM 14475 ..... project site will affect 58.0 acres of coastal sage scrub (Figure 3). .... A general field survey was conducted on the proposed coastal sage scrub mitigation site. The vegetation composition and density within parcels 2, 5, and 53 (Figure 4) is "-' very similar to the vegetation community in TM 14475 (Figure 5). The dominant ":' shrubs are California buckwheat (Eriogonum ./dsciculatum), California sagebrush '." (Artemisia cal~fornica), black sage (Salvia mellifera), yerba santa (Eriodic.tyon trichocalyx), and white sage (Salvia apiana). The proportion of chamise (Adenostoma .,.. ..... fasciculatum) increases on the slopes of the ridge lines within the parcels. There are · ~ .: ,' narrow strips of weedy vegetation, short-pod mustard (Hirschfeldia incana), and '" yellow star thistle (Centaurea solstitialis) in abandoned firebreaks along several ridge lines, yet native species are re-establishing. These ruderal conditions also exist along trails within TM 14475. ~ '.~':, ' .... Photographs were taken on the project site and the proposed mitigation areas (Figure '"' 6). Parcels 2, 5, and 53 contain vegetative cover similar to TM 14475 (Figures 7 and 8). Parcel 2 contains predominantly CSS (±16.9 acres) (Photo 7-1) and a portion dominated by chamise (4-0.1 acre). Parcel 5 encompasses steeper topography and has lower shrub density on the slopes (Photo 7-4). It contains 4-1.7 acres of alluvial scrub APN#: 200-051-02, 200-051-53,200-051-05 2/12/99((R:\wt1830\Off-Site Mitigation_ .i~g_; /Ct,5 .5trcct. 5~'titt 52~n '[~[t o/~.)?ll /~:;'et'~ae, Ca/i/ornta 9250i ] ;c~mdc ~tO9 (Photo 7-2), +1.4 acres of chaparral, and ±36.9 acres of CSS (Photo 7-4). The steep slopes in the northwest corner of parcel 53 consist dominantly of grassland habitat (±3.9 acres) (Photo 7-3), and in the northeast corner approximately 1.2 acres of chap- arral (Photo 7-6). Parcels 2 and 5 would preserve 57.0 acres of native habitat, which includes alluvial scrub (±1.7 acres), chaparral (±1.5 acres), and CSS (±54.0 acres) which is present in a higher density at lower elevations and in a lower density, on the steeper slopes. The largest proportion of land with similar topography to TM 14475 is located within parcels 2 and 53 (50.0 acres of native habitat). These parcels total +44.8 acres of CSS habitat, ±3.9 acres of grassland, and ±1.3 acres of chaparral. The areas of habitat that will be impacted, preserved on site, and available for off-site mitigation are summarized in the fbllowing table. Site TM14475 Parcel 2 Parcel 5 [ Parcel 53 Habitat Status Present Impacted Preserved Preserved (acres) CSS 59.0 58.0 1.0 16.9 36.9 27.9 Alluvial 9.0 0.0 9.0 0.0 1.7 0.0 Scrub Chaparral 34.0 23.0 11.0 0.1 1.4 1.2 Grassland 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.9 Disturbed I 11.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Areas: ~ Total 113.2 81.0 21.0 17.0 40.0 33.0 An appropriate replacement ration tbr mitigation would depend on the value of the potential preservation site. It could be appropriate to preserve mitigation lands at a 1: 1 ratio or less if the replacement lands are high value coastal sage scrub, support sensi- tive species. and are in a location that would facilitate management for associated habitat values (i.e., adjoining an existing preserve or linking preserved but disjunct habitat areas). The parcels adjacent to TM 14457 are known to meet most of these criteria: (1) in close proximiD' to the proposed development site, (2) of similar ecological (same vegetative composition and environmental conditions), (3) preserve wildlife habitat Native vegetation has re-established within the disturbed areas. 2/12/99((R:\wtt830\Off-Site Mitigation_ memo.wpd>) 2 (CSS and alluvial scrub) along and within Cucamonga Canyon, and (4) are located adjacent to the San Bernardino National Forest, increasing the amount of protected open space of the region. Focused surveys conducted on TM 14475 detected no endangered species. An intensive plant or wildlife survey was not conducted on par- cels 2, 5, and 53; therefore, the presence of sensitive or endangered species is not known. However, they are expected to support most, if not all, of the same species identified as occurring or potentially occurring on the site of TM 14475 (refer to "Tract Map 14475 Biological Assessment Report January. 8, 1999" by LSA Associates, Inc.). Assurances should be made with regards to the existence in perpetuity of the preserved habitat within TM 14475 and the selected mitigation sites. Preservation of habitat requires elimination or management of direct and indirect impacts. Direct impacts include disturbances such as grading and development. Indirect impacts can include recreationist encroachment upon mitigation sites and preserved areas, creation of trails. invasion of noxious weeds, wildlife depredation by free-ranging domestic pets, light pollution, fire management, and litter. The mitigation site could be dedicated, via a conservation easement agreement. to a conservation entity, such as the California Department of Fish and Game or the U.S. Forest Service. It may also be possible to dedicate lands in f~e title to the U.S. Forest Service in exchange for outlying Forest Service parcels. Within the project site, the open space areas will be protected from intrusions with tkncing along the equestrian trails and with block walks at the rear of lots that are located along the edge of the open space, Additional on-site habitat preservation involves dedicating the area of the project proper~ within Cucamonga Canyon (17.7 acres) to the San Bernardino County Flood Control District. If you require further information or assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me or Maria Lum at 909-781-9310. Sincerely, LSA ASSOCIATES, II~C. % ,/Jac~ Easton " Maria Lum "~3~'(sociate Asst. Project Manager Attachments: Figure 1 - Regional Location Figure 2 - Project and Mitigation Areas Figure 3 - Proposed Site Plan Figure 4 - Proposed Off-Site Mitigation Areas Vegetation Map Figure 5 - TM 14475 Vegetation Map Figure 6 - Project Site and Mitigation Areas Photograph Key Map Figure 7 - Mitigation Areas Site Photographs Figure 8 - Project Location Site Photographs 2/12/99((R:\wt1830\Off-Site Mitigation_ memo.wpd)> 3 TM 14475 ' ' ' Poj tL ti . , ,' %: '.: : '~' r ec oca on ;~::,!, Proposed Off-Site ........ ; .: ~¢:~. Mitigation Areas 0 Parcels) ~ ...........¢ ...........2; ....... Map Source: Sa~ Bernardino l:l ~,000-scal~ USGS Map, t 982, LSA o,, ,..,,, TM 14475 o, 5,ooo, ~o,~o, Regional Location NationalFoist Private . ~ Cuc~o~ga Wash to bc dedicated to Sa~ Bc~a~dmo Cou~ ~]ood ConSol Map Source: Cucamonga Peak & Mr. Baldy USGS Topographic Quadrangles, 1988. 2/10/99(W~830/Mitigation) ' Figure .2 N LSA TM 14475 ~ Project Site and Mitigation Areas 0' 1,000' 2,000' ~ ,,114J.EA, GROSS 113.2 AC. I ..... OPEN SPACE, LO'~ A-E 33.0 AC -/ % ?A ' NO. OFLOTS: ~'~ 5. C. J PL~MII~D 115 LO~ · \ PROPOSED 73 LOTS . x j PERMITTED 2.0 .... PROPOSED 1.3 °° MINIMUM LOT S/ZE 1.0 AC . ' ~ SPA~ LO~ B-E ~ ~ ~~D BY A ~ERS ~A~ J " ~ ~R ~JU~D N~ . j ' ' LOTA 17 c.~ga w~ 16 32 ' I Te ~ ~im~ 15 6 J ~g~ 31 . I . J . , 7 28 J 6 23 72 27 73 . LEGEND ~ Equine'Jan Tra;Is Q O R~irLo~ Source: Michael Brandman Associates, 1991. 2/10/99(WTL830/Mitigation) Figure 3 N LSA TM 14475 ~ Proposed Site Plan 0' 200' 400' ' :~ Alluvial Scrub I I Coastal Sage Scrub :;:~r,.,:# ..... ]' , t'''?, ..... ' ] ~ Map Source: Mt. Baldy USGS Topo~aphic Quadrangle, 1988. '.~.~ ...... , , , - , - ~ t ~ a t 2/10/99(WTL830~itigation ) Fibre 4 N TM 14475 gsm~ Proposed off-Site Mitigation Areas o, 2~o, ~oo, Vegetation Map TM 144 75 Project Boundary LEGEND: / ~DismrbedAreas ~Chapparral ~""~'~"'~"-~ ((, ' !! r3 I "[ ~~ Alluvial Scab ~ I Coastal Sage Scab Map Source: Mt. Baldy USGS Topo~aphic Quadrangle, 1988. 2/10/99(W~83 O/Mitigation) Fi~e 5 N LSA o, 2so, soo, Vegetation Map .. .... :,,.:, :... :, ~, ..... : ......... : ... ..... .;~', < .... ...:..,,:~?' :' :, : .... .:., _ .. -- .. :,-. .~ ...,:, -,..'.:,, ,, :,' . ;,,~ , :, ; :~, ,.: . . ~-' :"L%. -- :%'1~ ", ?:.. ,,>:, ~',-,'. ..... ,,. TM14475 . :~. ~ ::-:. ~ Project Loca~on .;~ · ,~ -..- ~:"~ 26th. S~et ~~ ~ LEGEND: - - ~ Photo~aph Location (See Figures 7 & 8for further &'tail) I TT14475 ~ Proposed Off-Site Mitigation~eas ~ Cucamonga Wash to be deCcated to San Bernardino Co~ Flood ConSol D is~ct (17.7 Acres) :~x~'~'~ Cucamonga Water Dis~ict .: .,, ...,..,:, Map Source: Cucamnga Peak & Mr. Baldy USGS Topo~aphic Quadr~gles, 1988. 2/10/99(WTL830~itigation) Fibre 6 N TM 14475 LSA Project Site and Mitigation Areas 0, s0o, ~,0o0, Photograph Key Map Site Photograph i!: Site Photograph 4: ~;'Hf~'~ ~)~',~,~'ce,[v :~ 4,~~. q ~' /~rcg'r(:;,u~d, ~J~ ,v[op~s it~ ~arc'c~'J.; Site Photograph 2: Site Photograph 5: Site Photograph 3:' Site Photograph 6: ~o~:,.s.~ ~! vagc vcr~'b am:t' C'haparral habita~ Figure 7 LSA ~:~ 144 75 M:it:igation Areas Site Photographs ORIGINAL,, :POOR QUALJT¥ Site Photograph 7: , Site Photograph 10: s'crub /ab ~tat [ookia~:~ so~ th ,~ c'~/ ~,~"oasta/ sage ~'c~b a~:~jacent to canyon ed lo~kmg south'to water tan~. Site Photograph 8: Site Photograph 11: Site Photograph 9: Site Photograph 12: ,'.;c;-td;, ,hahira! ?ookin~g ,s'o,,ett* ,l~J"~.?!' (,_'i'h~l:,arr~::[ habitat east Of trail /ookin;[? Figure 8 TiM 14475 LSA Project Location Site Photographs NILLSIDE RD ,-- .: ......: ~=~ ....................~.~:.. . .............. BANYAN ST '.ion\J. ~'~ 2111/99{WTL83 0~ TM 14475 - Meeting Location: . City of Rancho Cucamonga .. °r~' Northeast corner of Almond Street and Sapphire Street o' 2400' Phone.' (909) 781-9310 Cellular.' (760) 382-0801