HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999/01/06 - Agenda PacketCITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
REGULAR MEETINGS
1st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:00 p.m.
January 6,1999
Civic Center
Council Chambers
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
City Counciimembers
William J. Alexander, Mayor
Diane Williams, Mayor Pro Tern
Paul Biane, Councilmember
James V. Curatalo, Councilmember
Bob Dutton, Councilmember
Jack Lam, City Manager
James L. Markman, City At. torney
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk
City Office: 477-2700
City Council Agenda
January 6, 1999
All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing.
The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, one
week prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such
items.
1. Roll Call:
A. CALL TO ORDER
Alexander , Biane
Curatalo , Dutton
and Williams
B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
Presentation of a check for $10,0(;)0 from the Friends of the
Rancho Cucamonga Public Library.
Presentation of a Proclamation recognizing the Friends of the
Library for donating $200,000 for library materials and programs
since 1995.
Presentation of a Proclamation to inland Valley Daily Bulletin,
congratulating them on their 1988 CALTAC Award for media
support to public libraries and to the Library Telethon.
C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
This is the time and place for the general public to address the City
Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any
issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may
receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.
Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual.
D. CONSENT CALENDAR
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and
non-controversial. Theywill be acted upon by the Council at one time
without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember
or member of the audience for discussion.
Approval of Minutes:
November 18, 1998
December 2, 1998 (Curatalo absent)
December 16, 1998 (Special Meeting)
December 16, 1998
Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 12/9/98 and 12/16/98 and
Payroll ending 12/10/98 for the total amount of $2,205,033.73.
City Council Agenda
January 6, 1999
2
Approval of Alcoholic Beverage Application for On-Sale Beer and
Wine for Arrow Dell, Brian B. & Christine K. Woo, 10970 Arrow
Rte, #101.
Approval of Alcoholic Beverage Application for Off-Sale Beer and
Wine for Rod's Texaco, Alifuad Abood Hussain, 8166 Foothill Blvd.
Approval of request for waiver of Epicenter Rental Fees for the
School Bus Roadeo to be held on April 16 & 17, 1999.
Approval of a Resolution authorizing the destruction of City
records pursuant to the City's Records Retention Schedule.
RESOLUTION NO 99-001
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE
DESTRUCTION OF CITY RECORDS WHICH
ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED AS SET FORTH
IN CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE
SECTION 34090 AND OTHER APPLICABLE
LEGAL REFERENCES
Approval of a Resolution providing the City Engineer with authority
to execute all right-of-way certifications required for Federally-
funded projects or projects within State Right-of-Way.
RESOLUTION NO. 99-002
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY' OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING THE CITY
ENGINEER WITH AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE
ALL RIGHT-OF-WAY CERTIFICATIONS
Approval to Order the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance
District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and
6 for D.R. 98-04, located on the northeast corner of Base Line
Road and Archibald Avenue, submitted by Retail Holdings, L.L.C.
RESOLUTION NO. 99-003
A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF
THE CI'FY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION
OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NOS. 1 AN[) 6 FOR D.R 98-.04 (APN: 1076-191-
O9)
11
13
15
17
18
21
22
23
25
City Council Agenda
January 6, 1999
10.
11.
12.
Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security
for Tract 14380, located on the north side of Wilson Avenue west
of Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by Mastercraft Homes and General
Electric Capital Corporation, and release of previously submitted
Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security accepted by
City Council on November 6, 1991, from Watt Inland Empire, Inc.
RESOLUTION NO. 99-004
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT MAP
NUMBER 14380
Approval of Professional Service Contract (CO 99-001) for Plan
Check service with Aufbau Corporation.
Approval to appropriate $26,757.80 from the fund balance of Fund
22 to be placed into Account No. 22-4637-9817, approve the
award and authorize the execution of the Contract (CO 99-002)for
the construction of traffic signals and safety lighting at three
intersections, to Computer Service Company in the amount of
$424,468.00 ($385,880.00 plus 10%) to be funded from
Transportation Development Fees from the following Account
Numbers: $125,728..90 from 22-4637-9816 (signal at Rochester
and Victoria Park Lane); $166,757.80 frorn 22-4637-9817 (signal
at Highland and Carnelian); and $131,981.30 from 22-4637-9818
(signal at Rochester and Vintage).
Approval to appropriate funds received from California Department
of Aging Grant in the amount of $3,000 for Senior Citizen Outreach
Services (CO 99-003) for FY 1998-99.
28
31
32
33
35
E. CONSENT ORDINANCES
The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first
reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non-
controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time
without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be
removed for discussion.
CONSIDERATION OF CODE AMENDMENTS REGARDING
GRADING REVIEW AND TIME EXTENSIONS CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
69
City Council Agenda
January 6, 1999
ORDINANCE NO. 594 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 15, CHAPTER
15.12 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MUNICIPAL. CODE REGARDING REVIEW OF
GRADING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
ORDINANCE NO. 595 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY' OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 16 OF THE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE
REGARDING THE EXTENSION OF
SUBDIVISION MAPS
ORDINANCE NO 596 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT
CODE AMENDMENT 98-01, AMENDING
SECTION 17.02.100 OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA DEVELOPMENT CODE,
REGARDING LAPSE OF APPROVALS AND
EXTENSIONS
69
72
76
F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public
hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to
receive public testimony.
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 98-02 - CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the regulations for
second dwelling units.
ORDINANCE NO. 597 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL
OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT NO.
98-02, AMENDING SECTION 17.08.030,
PERTAINING TO SECOND DWELLING UNITS
REGULATIONS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF
78
96
City Council Agenda
January 6, 1999
G. PUBLIC HEARINGS
The following
requirements.
testimony.
items have no legal publication or posting
The Chair will open the meeting to receive public
No Items Submitted.
H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
The following items do not legally require any public testimony,
although the Chair may open the meeting for public input.
No Items Submitted.
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
The following items have been requested by the City Council for
discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair
may open the meeting for public input.
CONSIDERATION AND DISCUSSION OF THE PARK AND
RECREATION COMMISSION'S RECOMMENDATION RELATING
TO PARKING AT WEST BERYL PARK
REPORT ON DOG BITE INCIDENT ~ VINEYARD JUNIOR HIGH
SCHOOL
99
101
J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to
discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this
meeting, only identified for the next meeting.
K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
This is the time and place for the general public to address the City
Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any
issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may
receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.
Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual.
CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST BY HILLSIDE COMMUNITY
CHURCH TO WAIVE FEES FOR SOAPBOX CLASSIC TO BE
HELD MAY 31, 1999, AT THE EPICENTER SPORTS COMPLEX
107
City Council Agenda
January 6, 1999
L. ADJOURNMENT
MEETING TO ADJOURN TO EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS
PROPERTY NEGOTIATIONS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON ETIWANDA AVENUE AND
VICTORIA AVENUE; BRAD BULLER, CITY PLANNER, NEGOTIATING
PARTY, REGARDING TERMS OF AGREEMENT.
I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my
designee, hereby certify that: a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda
was posted on December 30, 1998, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the
meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive.
November 18, 1998
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Regular Meeting
A. CALL TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, November 18, 1998,
in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga,
California. The meeting was called to order at 7:24 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander.
Present were Councilmembers: Paul Biane, James Curatalo, Bob Dutton, Diane Williams and MayorWilliam
J. Alexander.
Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City
Manager; Mitch Slagerman, Sr. RDA Analyst; Jan Reynolds, RDA Analyst; Rick Gomez, Community
Development Director; Brad Buller, City Planner; Tom Grahn, Associate Planner; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer;
Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer; Dan James, Sr. Civil Engineer; Jon Gillespie, Traffic Engineer; Bill
Makshanoff, Building Official; Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director; Jim Frost, City Treasurer;
Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director; Dave Moore, Recreation Superintendent; Paula Pachon,
Management Analyst II; Deborah Clark, Library Director; Diane O'Neal, Assistant to the City Manager; Jenny
Haruyama, Management Analyst I; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Bob
Corcoran, Fire Deputy Chief; Captain Rodney Hoops, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; and Debra
J. Adams, City Clerk.
B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
B 1. Recognition of Lewis Homes Management Corporation for support of the 1998 College Fair.
Mayor Alexander recognized Paula Dempsey and the Community Services staff for their efforts on this
project.
Nettie Nielsen presented a plaque to Ms. Dempsey for her support of this program.
The students also presented certificates to the staff involved in this program.
B2. Mayor Alexander announced that the Chaffey Garcia House, located at 7150 Eftwanda Avenue, will
have an open house this Saturday.
City Council Minutes
November 18, 1998
Page 2
C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
C1. Frank Williams, Chairman of the Affordable Housing Corporation in Rancho Cucamonga, talked
about the newly created program. He stated there has been no government dollars contributed towards this.
He stated the proper name for this is called "Housing Action Resource Trust (HART) which is a down
payment assistance program.
C2 Leonna Klippstein, Spirit of the Sage, commented on a letter that was faxed to the Council. She
asked that the public comments be opened up on the Haven View Estates item. She commented on a letter
that was written by Gerald Braden on October 29 from the Department of Community and Cultural Services.
She felt the public should be allowed to give input about the Haven View Estates Item I1. She also handed
to the City Clerk other documents which she wanted included into the record.
C3. Malissa McKeith, Ginger Court, wanted to submit information to the Central Park Task Force and
asked how this can be done.
Rick Gomez, Community Development Director, stated the next meeting is scheduled for December 8 at
6:00 p.m. in the Tri Communities Room and she could distribute the information then.
Ms. McKeith also inquired if anyone would be allowed to speak for the Haven View item.
James Markman, City Attorney, stated they would be allowed to speak.
Ms. McKeith stated she does have documents she would like to submit for the record regarding CEQA.
D. CONSENT CALENDAR
D1. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 10/28/98 and 11/4/98 and Payroll ending 10/11/98 and
10/25/98 for the total amount of $3,387,204.05.
D2. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of October 31, 1998.
D3. Approval to advertise for "Notice Inviting Bids" for the construction of landscaping and irrigation for
the Haven Avenue Beautification Project between Base Line Road and Church Street, to be funded from
Beautification Funds, Account No. 21-4647-9709.
RESOLUTION NO. 98-204
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
· " THE "HAVEN AVENUE BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT, BETWEEN BASE LINE
ROAD AND CHURCH STREET" IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND
DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
City Council Minutes
November 18, 1998
Page 3
D4. Approval to advertise for "Notice Inviting Bids" for the construction of traffic signals and safety
lighting at three locations, located at the intersections of Rochester Avenue at Vintage Drive, Rochester
Avenue at Victoria Park Lane and Carnelian Avenue at Highland Avenue, to be funded from Transportation
Systems Development Funds, Account Nos. 22-4637-9818, 22-4637-9816 and 22.4537-9817, respectively.
RESOLUTION NO. 98-205
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
THE "CONSTRUCTION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT
THREE LOCATIONS" tN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE
CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
D5. Approval to destroy records and documents which are no longer required as provided under
Government Code Section 34090 and 34090.5.
RESOLUTION NO. 98-206
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF CITY
RECORDS WHICH ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED AS SET FORTH IN
CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 34090 AND OTHER APPLICABLE
LEGAL REFERENCES
D6. Approval of graphic design for Senior Transportation Program.
D7. Approval of funds in the amount of $1,308 from Account No. 01.4532-3900-4203-3602 for transfer
of title for senior transportation bus from City to the Rancho Cucamonga YMCA.
DS. Approval to appropriate $32,240 from Fund 28 - CDBG (A/C 28-4333-9106) for the construction of
wheelchair ramps at various locations.
D9. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for D.R. 97-43, located at the
southwest corner of Arrow Route and Rochester Avenue, submitted by Schlosser Forge Company.
RESOLUTION NO. 98-207
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENTAGREEMENTAND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR D.R. 97-43
D10. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Tract 14379, located on the
north side of Wilson Avenue west of Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by Centex Homes, and release of
previously submitted Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security accepted by City Council on
November 6, 1991, from Watt Inland Empire, Inc.
City Council Minutes
November 18, 1998
Page 4
RESOLUTION NO. 98-208
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT MAP NUMBER 14379
D11. Approval to execute a Professional Services Agreement with Crossroads Software (CO98-063) of
Brea, California, for developing and providing a computerized traffic collision database and analyst system
in the amount of $23,915.11 to be funded from California Office of Traffic Safety Funds, Account No. 24-
4637-9825.
D12. Approval of Cooperative Agreement between Etiwanda School District (CO98-064) and the City of
Rancho Cucamonga for street improvements on the north side of Summit Avenue from East Avenue to 1200
feet east of East Avenue.
RESOLUTION NO. 98-209
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE EXECUTION OF THE
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT
AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FOR THE PROPOSED SUMMIT
AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF
SUMMIT AVENUE FROM EAST AVENUE TO 1200 FEET EAST OF EAST
AVENUE
D13. Approval of a Professional Services Agreement with L.D. King, Inc. (CO98-065) to provide
preliminary design engineering services for Foothill Boulevard (State Route 66) median islands, from Grove
Avenue to Vineyard Avenue in the amount of $58,900, and authorization of 10% contingency to be funded
from Account No. 22-4637-9843.
D14. Approval to execute Supplement No. 021 (CO98-066) of the State-Local Transportation Partnership
Program Agreement No. SLTPP-5420 for the widening of the Burlington/Santa Fe Railroad Crossing on
Arrow Route west of Milliken Avenue.
RESOLUTION NO. 98-210
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA TO APPROVE SUPPLEMENT NO. 21 TO THE STATE-LOCAL
TRANSPORTATION PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM AGREEMENT NO. SLTPP-5420
AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY CLERK AND MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAID
SUPPLEMENT NO. 21
MOTION: Moved by Dutton, seconded by Curatalo to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports
contained in the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0.
City Council Minutes
November 18, 1998
Page 5
No Items Submitted.
E. CONSENT ORDINANCES
F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
Fl. CONSIDERATION TO AMEND CITY ORDINANCE NO. 522 IN ORDER TO DELETE THE
MANDATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROVISION OF TELECOMMUTING CENTERS AND ON-SITE
VIDEO CONFERENCE FACILITIES, AND THAT NEW HOMES AND OFFICE BUILDINGS BE
CONDITIONED TO BE EQUIPPED WITH CATEGORY 5 TELEPHONE CABLE OR FIBER OPTIC CABLE
AS APPROPRIATE
Staff report presented by Jon Gillespie, Traffic Engineer.
Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council was:
Mahlon Sampson, Cottage Ave., stated he does electrical contracting and he hoped there would be
guidelines for developers for the requirements. He also asked who would be responsible for
inspecting the Category V wiring.
Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated there will be guidelines developed. He stated the inspections will be done
through Building and Planning departments.
Mayor Alexander stated he felt the Council should approve the guidelines.
There being no further response, the public hearing was closed.
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 522A.
ORDINANCE NO. 522 A (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE
AMENDMENT 98-03, AMENDING CHAPTERS 1708 AND 17.10 OF THE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE, REGARDING TRIP REDUCTION
REQUIREMENTS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Dutton to waive full reading and set second reading for
December 2, 1998. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0.
City Council Minutes
November 18, 1998
Page 6
G. PUBLIC HEARINGS
G1. CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OFAN URGENCY ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 10.68
OF TITLE 10 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO THE USE OF
SPRUCE AVENE PARK SKATE FACILITY AND APPROVAL OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER
10.68 OF TITLE 10 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO THE USE OF
SPRUCE AVENUE PARK SKATE FACILITY
Staff report presented by Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director.
Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was
closed.
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No.414A (urgency).
ORDINANCE NO. 414 A (URGENCY)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 10.68 OF TITLE 10 OF THE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO THE USE OF
SPRUCE AVENUE PARK SKATE FACILITY, AND PROVIDING FOR ITS
ADOPTION AS AN URGENCY ORDINANCE
MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Curatalo to waive full reading and approve Ordinance No. 414A
(urgency). Motion carried unanimously, 5-0.
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 414B.
ORDINANCE NO. 414 B (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
C UCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 10.68 OF TITLE 10 OF THE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TOT HE USE OF
SPRUCE AVENUE PARK SKATE FACILITY
MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Biane to waive full reading and set second reading of Ordinance
No. 414B for the December 2, 1998 meeting. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0.
H. CiTY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
No Items Submitted.
City Council Minutes
November 18, 1998
Page 7
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
I1. CONSIDERATION OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 98-13 ~ THE HEIGHTS AT HAVEN VIEW
ESTATES, LLC - An appeal of a Planning Commission decision to approve a design review of the detailed
Site Plan and building elevations for Tract 14771, consisting of 40 single family homes on 25.35 acres of
land in the Very Low Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre), located east of Haven Avenue
and north of Ringstem Drive - APN: 1074-511-27 through 31 and 1074-621-01 through 35.
(CONTINUED FROM SEPTEMBER 16, 1998)
I1. Councilmembers Biane and Dutton excused themselves from the discussion and action of this item as
was stated at the September' 16, 1998 City Council meeting.
A recess was taken at 8:05 p.m. The meeting was called back to order at 8:20 p.m. with all Councilmembers
present except Councilmembers Biane and Dutton.
Mayor Alexander stated there was an 8 year old girl, Jenna Littlejohn, that passed away from a heart
transplant that lives in this area. He stated anyone that wants to help towards this cause can make
contributions to Sanwa Bank or Coyota Canyon School.
James Markman, City Attorney, stated a staff report would not be given again, but that at the last meeting
he asked for a settlement conference to try to settle this matter. He stated there was a process that was
conducted. He felt it was productive, but has not concluded into settlement. He also stated some of the
other ideas to pursue a joint review of the engineering studies for the debris basin levee issue did not
commence. He stated he did enjoy the process and received everyone's input. He commented that per the
Brown Act the public has the right to speak even though this is not a noticed public hearing or part of the
administrative hearing.
Mayor Alexander opened thE; meeting for public comments. Addressing the City Council were:
Joseph T. Greer, Orange Avenue, distributed a map for the Council to see which showed the levee
and the condition it was in. He felt people would be put in danger if the levee is eliminated.
Malissa McKeith, Loeb and Loeb, stated she did not think the matter could be resolved in two
months through the settlement process. She talked about a letter she sent to the Council and Mr.
Markman regarding the safety issue, and stated she did not receive a response. She felt that they
should continue through the settlement process and that the City should do a safety study. She felt
the City has an obligation. She asked that this matter be continued tonight so that discussions can
continue. She also mentioned she did not think the land was developable.
Richard Stone gave a recap of what had happened over the last two months during the settlement
negotiations. He stated if the developer wants to continue negotiations, they are agreeable to this.
He asked that the City order the safety study.
City Council Minutes
November 18, 1998
Page 8
Kathleen Stockwell, 22792 Loren St., Mission Viejo and also a former resident of Rancho
Cucamonga years ago, stated she is with a conservation group. She agreed a public safety study
should occur. She stated she would like to see any information that proves the levee is safe. She
talked about the earthquake faults that run through this area and the concern this has for her. She
felt this area is very wealthy with habitat. She felt all aspects should be looked at before it is
approved.
Leonna Klippstein, Spirit of the Sage, stated she has resigned from being President of CURE. She
stated Spirit of the Sage is not part of CURE. She talked about the various Acts relating to the
species and wildlife in this area. She felt the property should be condemned to protect the residents
and the wildlife at the Lauren property. She also had documents she described regarding the nat
catcher.
Frank Williams of the BIA reminded people that their homes were built by developers and builders.
He stated he did not feel people should be putting down the building industry. 'He felt that if people
live in an area and don't think it is safe, they should leave the area. He felt it was a real shame this
developer has had to go through this. He asked that the Council let the property owners move
forward with this project.
Mahlon Sampson, 4965 Calico Court, stated this is not buildable land and that there is not a big
developer that would build up in that area. He stated there has not been much discussion about
safety issues over the last two months.
Mayor Alexander asked if he knew the levee had already been disturbed when he bought the property.
Mahlon Sampson stated "no" he did not know that.
Joseph Stevens, 5067 Granada Court, felt if the project is approved the Council is putting the lives
of people in jeopard,./. He asked that the project not be approved.
Rex Gutierrez, 11021 Carlow Court, stated he did not see any reason why a safety study cannot
happen by a third party. He felt possibly there should be a preserve in that area. He felt the Council
should be prudent with this decision. He wondered if it was really appropriate for Councilmembers
Biane and Dutton not to be voting on this.
Bob Christiano, property owner, stated he was heartened to hear that CURE has no objection to the
design of their homes because that is why they are all present at this meeting. He stated he was
also heartened to hear that the judge in the CEQA issue made a determination that neither Lauren
nor the City has done something wrong in their consideration of all of the issues that are involved
in this matter. He stated the judge who reviewed this matter read over 60 pounds of submitted
materials. He stated the offer is nowhere near where it should be. He stated if the project is
approved for the design review, the other matter can be dealt with after that at any time. He
continued to comment on some of the previous comments that had been made. He also talked
about the maintenance of the road and the breech of the levee and stated this is in the CC&R's. He
stated anyone moving into this community receives the CC&R's. He stated he hoped this matter
would be decided this evening.
City Council Minutes
November 18, 1998
Page 9
Bruce Ann Hahn, 5087 Granada Court, stated there are natural hazards in this area and that she
did not agree with Mr. Christiano.
Tom Bradford, 5066 Granada Court, stated he is really concerned about the safety of this. He asked
if the City would do a safety study.
Mayor Alexander stated he wonders if the study has already been done. He felt the answer to this question
was yes.
Mr. Bradford felt a safety study should be done now.
Maurene Sampson, 4965 Calico stated there is public access to their property. She felt the Council
should rethink this.
There being no further response, public comments were closed.
Councilmember Williams stated the safety issue was a big issue with her. She at one time felt an
independent study should be done. She referred to a letter from FEMA dated 8/19/91 and felt based upon
their report, she is not concerned about the safety issue any longer.
Councilmember Curatalo stated he has read mountains of paper on this and is ready to put closure to this.
Mayor Alexander asked if the City has ignored any endangered species.
Brad Buller, City Planner, stated no they have not. He stated they have technically done things according
to CEQA.
Mayor Alexander stated if he felt there was an issue of safety, he would not let this project go forward, but
stated he does not think safety is an issue
RESOLUTION NO. 98-178
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING APPEALS OF A PLANNING
COMMISSION DECISION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 98-13 FOR
TRACT 14771, A DESIGN REVIEW OF THE DETAILED SITE PLAN AND
BUILDING ELEVATIONS FOR 40 SINGLE FAMILY HOMES ON 25.35 ACRES OF
LAND, LOCATED EAST OF HAVEN AVENUE AND NORTH OF RINGSTEM
DRIVE IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (LESS THAN 2 DWELLING
UNITS PER ACRE), AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN:
1074-511-27 TO 31 AND 1074-621-1 TO 35
RESOLUTION NO. 98-179
A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING APPEALS OF A PLANNING
COMMISSION DECISION DETERMINATION THAT NO SUBSEQUENT
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW IS NECESSARY TO DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 98-13
City Council Minutes
November 18, 1998
Page 10
FOR TRACT 14771, A DESIGN REVIEW OF THE DETAILED SITE PLAN AND
BUILDING ELEVATIONS FOR 40 SINGLE FAMILY HOMES ON 25.35 ACRES OF
LAND, LOCATED EAST OF HAVEN AVENUE AND NORTH OF RINGSTEM
DRIVE IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (LESS THAN 2 DWELLING
UNITS PER ACRE), AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN:
1074-511-27 TO 31 AND 1074-621-1 TO 35
MOTION: Moved by Curatalo, seconded by Alexander to deny the appeal and approve the Planning
Commission's recommendation by adopting Resolution Nos. 98-178 and 98-179. Motion carried 3-0-0-2
(Biane and Dutton abstained)
Councilmember Dutton returned at 9:45 p.m.
Councilmember Biane did not return due to illness.
12. PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES UPDATE
Ao
PARKS & FACILITIES UPDATE
1. Rancho Cucamonga Family Sports Center
2. Rancho Cucamonga Public Library
3. Stadium
4. Spruce Avenue Park Skate Facility
5. Victoria Groves
6. Coyote Canyon Park
7. Red Hill Park
8. Lions Park
9. Spruce Avenue Park
10. Etiwanda Creek Park
11. Central Park
12. All Park Facilities
COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE
1. Seniors
2. Teens
3. Youth Activities
4. Youth Sports
5. Rancho Cucamonga Family Sports Center
6. Adult Sports
7. Facilities
8. The Grapevine
9. Contract Classes
10. Community Wide Special Events
11. Proposed Boxing Program
12. Senior Transportation Program
13. Trips and Tours
14. Human Services
15. Park and Recreation Commission
16. Epicenter
City Council Minutes
November 18, 1998
Page 11
MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Curatalo to receive and file the report. Motion carried
unanimously, 4-0-1 (Biane absent).
13. REPORT ON SELECTION PROCESS OF VENDORS USED BY THE CITY
Staff report presented by Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director.
Councilmember Williams asked if there was something that could be established where bid information could
be put in the Chamber News or other publications so that more awareness is out there for the vendors that
might want to go through the bid process.
Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director, stated yes.
J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
J1. Councilmember Dutton stated he would like to have a report at the next meeting on Central Park
because of questions that have come up and various comments that were made.
Councilmember Williams felt it should go on the Internet as well.
K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
K1. Councilmember Dutton stated he wanted everyone to know he takes his responsibilities as
Councilmember very seriously and that he has got three opinions that told him he should not vote on the
Lauren matter.
L. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Dutton to adjourn to executive session to discuss:
A. POTENTIAL LITIGATION PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9.
B. PROPERTY NEGOTIATIONS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY
LOCATED AT ROCHESTER, BETWEEN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND ARROW ROUTE; JERRY
FULWOOD, DEPUTY CITY MANAGER, NEGOTIATING PARTY, REGARDING TERMS OF
PAYMENT.
City Council Minutes
November 18, 1998
Page 12
Motion carried 4-0-1 (Biane absent). No action was taken in executive session. The meeting adjourned at
9:57 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Debra J. Adams, CMC
City Clerk
Approved:
December 2, 1998
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Regular Meetinn
A. CALL TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, December 2, 1998, in
the Council Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga,
California. The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander.
Present were Councilmembers: Paul Biane, Bob Dutton, Diane Williams, and Mayor William J. Alexander.
Also present were: Jack Larn, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City
Manager; Linda Daniels, RDA Director; Rick Gomez, Community Development Director; Brad Buller, City
Planner; Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer; Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director; Tamara Layne,
Finance Officer; Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director; Dave Moore, Recreation Superintendent;
Deborah Clark, Library Director; Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager; Diane O'Neal, Assistant to the
City Manager; Jenny Haruyama, Management Analyst I; Captain Rodney Hoops, Rancho Cucamonga
Police Department; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk.
Absent was: Councilmember James Curatalo.
B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
B1. Presentation of a Proclamation to Assemblyman Fred Aguiar.
Mayor Alexander presented the Proclamation to Fred Aguiar for his service to the City of Rancho
Cucamonga while serving in Assembly District 61.
Assemblyman Aguiar thanked the Council for this special recognition. He stated he has tried to get
money from the state for after school programs and was successful. He presented the City with a
check in the amount of $30,000 from the State of California.
City Council Minutes
December 2, 1998
Page 2
C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
No communications were made from the public.
D. CONSENT CALENDAR
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated item No. D4 needs to be corrected to read west of Etiwanda Avenue and
not east of Etiwanda Avenue.
D1. Approval of Minutes:: October 21, 1998
November 4, 1998
D2. Approval. of Warrants, Register Nos. 11/11/98 and 11/18/98 and Payroll ending 11/10/98 for the total
amount of $1,495,505.13.
D3.
Act.
Approval of a Resolution to adopt new trust requirements under the Small Business Job Protection
RESOLUTION NO. 98-211
A RESOLUTION OF THE CIT'Y' COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING NEW TRUST REQUIREMENTS
UNDER THE SMALL BUSINESS JOB PROTECTION ACT FOR THE CITY'S
DEFERRED' COMPENSATION PLAN
D4. Approval to appropriate $191,736.00 from Trust Account Fund No. 70-276-477 for undergrounding
of the existing overhead utility lines along Highland Avenue ea~ west of Etiwanda Avenue in conjunction
with Freeway Utility Relocation Project.
D5. Approval of the Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for street improvements at
model site related to Tentative Tract 15072, generally located at the southwest corner of Rochester Avenue
and Base Line Road, submitted by Lewis Development Co.
RESOLUTION NO. 98-212
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTAND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS AT MODEL SITE,
RELATED TO TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 15072
MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Biane to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports
contained in the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Curatalo absent).
City Council Minutes
December 2, 1998
Page 3
E. CONSENT ORDINANCES
El. CONSIDERATION TO AMEND CITY ORDINANCE NO. 522 IN ORDER TO DELETE THE
MANDATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROVISION OF TELECOMMUTING CENTERS AND ON-SITE
VIDEO CONFERENCE FACILITIES, AND THAT NEW HOMES AND OFFICE BUILDINGS BE
CONDITIONED TO BE EQUIPPED WITH CATEGORY 5 TELEPHONE CABLE OR FIBER OPTIC CABLE
AS APPROPRIATE
E1 and E2. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the titles of Ordinance Nos. 522A and 414B.
ORDINANCE NO. 522 A (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE
AMENDMENT 98-03, AMENDING CHAPTERS 1708 AND 17.1'0 OF THE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE, REGARDING TRIP REDUCTION
REQUIREMENTS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
E2. APPROVAL OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 10.68 OF TITLE 10 OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO THE USE OF SPRUCE AVENUE PARK SKATE
FACILITY
ORDINANCE NO. 414 B (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 10.68 OF TITLE 10 OFTHE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO THE USE OF
SPRUCE AVENUE PARK SKATE FACILITY
MOTION: Moved by Dutton, seconded by Williams to waive full reading and approve Ordinance Nos. 522A
and 414B. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Curatalo absent).
F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
Fl. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
98-04 - RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - A request to change the General Plan
Land Use Map from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre)and Civic/Community to Low-Medium
Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for 17 acres of land on the north side of Base Line Road,
approximately 1,300 feet east of the intersection of Rochester Avenue- APN: 0227-091-18 through 21. Staff
has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration.
F1 - F4. Staff report presented by Alan Warren.
Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was
closed.
City Council Minutes
December 2, 1998
Page 4
RESOLUTION NO. 98-213
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 98-
04, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM
MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND
CIVIC/COMMUNITY TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS
PER ACRE), WITH A MASTER PLAN REQUIREMENT, FOR 17 ACRES OF
LAND, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD,
APPROXIMATELY 1,300 FEET EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF ROCHESTER
AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 0227-91-18
THROUGH 21
F2. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN
AMENDMENT 98-03 - RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - A request to change the
Victoria Community Plan Land Use Map from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and
Community Facility to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for 17 acres of land on the north
side of Base Line Road, approximately 1,300 feet east of the intersection of Rochester Avenue - APN: 0227-
091-18 through 21. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration.
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the titles of Ordinance Nos. 592 and 593.
ORDINANCE NO. 592 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN
AMENDMENT 98-03, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY
PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS
PER ACRE) AND COMMUNITY FACILITY TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8
DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 17 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE
NORTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 1,300 FEET EAST OF
THE INTERSECTION OF ROCHESTER AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0227-091-18 THROUGH 21
F3. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
98-05 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to change the General Plan Land Use Map from
Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre)
for approximately 6 acres of land on the north side of Base Line Road, approximately 1,100 feet east of the
intersection of Rochester Avenue - APN: 0227-091-22 and 25. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration
of environmental impacts for' consideration.
RESOLUTION NO. 98-2t4
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 98-
05, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM
MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW-MEDIUM
RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), WITH A MASTER PLAN
City Council Minutes
December 2, 1998
Page 5
REQUIREMENT, FOR SIX ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE
OF BASE LINE ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 1,100 FEET EAST OF THE
INTERSECTION OF ROCHESTER AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0227-091-22 AND 25
F4. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN
AMENDMENT 98-04 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to change the Victoria Community
Plan Land Use Map from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Residential (4-8
dwelling units per acre) for approximately 6 acres of land on the north side of Base Line Road, approximately
1,100 feet east of the intersection of Rochester Avenue and for 2 Y2 acres of land approximately 2,000 feet
east of the intersection of Rochester Avenue - APN: 0227-091-22, 25, and 43. Staff has prepared a
Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration.
ORDINANCE NO. 593 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN
AMENDMENT 98-04, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY
PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS
PER ACRE) TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER
ACRE) FOR 6 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BASE
LINE ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 1,100 FEET EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF
ROCHESTER AVENUE AND FOR 2 ¼ ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE
NORTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 2,000 FEET EAST OF
THE INTERSECTION OF ROCHESTER AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 0227-091-22, 25, AND 43
MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Williams to approve Resolution Nos. 98-213 and 98-214 and waive
full reading and set second reading of Ordinance Nos. 592 and 593 for December 16, 1998. Motion carried
unanimously, 4-0-1 (Curatalo).
G. PUBLIC HEARINGS
G1. CONSIDERATION OF AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION REGARDING
THE LA FOURCADE ARCH UNDER CUP 91-24 - MASl COMMERCE PARTNERS - A request to appeal
the Planning Commission's decision in denying the change in location of placing the La Fourcade Arch on
Building 5 - APN: 229-011-39.
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated there has been a request by the applicant for this item to be continued for
60 days. He stated at this point, there is some belief that the issue will probably be resolved without the
need for it to come back at all to the Council. He asked for the item to be removed from the agenda and that
it will be readvertised should there be a need for it come back in the future.
MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Biane to remove the item from the agenda. Motion carried
unanimously, 4-0-1 (Curatalo absent).
City Council Minutes
December 2, 1998
Page 6
No Items Submitted.
H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
SELECTION OF TWO COUNCIL MEMBERS TO SERVE ON THE GENERAL PLAN REVISION
I1.
TASK FORCE
Staff report presented by Rick Gomez, Community Development Director.
ACTION: Councilmembers Biane and Dutton would serve on the task force.
12. CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FROM CITIZENS COMMITTED TO CHILDREN TO SUPPORT
A BOND MEASURE FOR ALTA LOMA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Staff report presented by Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager.
Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public comment. Addressing the City Council were:
Gary Womack, Citizens Community Children, asked the Council to approve the Resolution so that
a school can be built.
Councilmember Dutton asked if the City could possible do a joint use agreement for the new school that is
built.
It was answered by someone in the audience that this was something that could be looked at. She
stated there is dialog going on with the library about this also.
Mayor Alexander read the Resolution in its entirety.
RESOLUTION NO. 98-215
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, IN SUPPORTOF AGENEPAL OBLIGATION BOND
FOR THE ALTA LOMA SCHOOL DISTRICT
MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Williams to approve Resolution No. 98-215. Motion carried
unanimously, 4-0-1 (Curatalo absent).
13. REPORT ON HISTORY OF CENTRAL PARK
Staff report by Rick Gomez, Community Development Director.
City Council Minutes
December 2, 1998
Page 7
Councilmember Dutton reiterated what Mn Gomez had just reported stating the money for PD-85 was for
Red Hill and Heritage Parks and that it could not be spent on Central Park unless it was to be voted on by
the voters.
Councilmember Dutton asked if the City disposes of the property within the first twenty years, would Lewis
Homes have the first right of refusal on the property.
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated yes.
Councilmember Biane inquired about the boundaries of PD-85.
James Markman, City Attorney, stated it covers about 1/3 of the City. He stated the proceeds of the district
are very limited and specific as to how they can be used.
Councilmember Biane inquired what the east and west boundaries are of PD-85.
Rick Gomez, Community Development Director, stated to describe the boundaries you would need to
exclude the area east of Haven from about Base Line and over, which are not part of the district. He stated
the southern and western portion of the City are included.
Councilmember Biane stated people west of Haven stated they had voiced to him they hoped they were not
in the district having to pay for it when they do not have Central Park to enjoy.
Councilmember Dutton stated the City knew as homes on the east side were built parks would be required
to be built and paid for by assessment districts. He stated it was his understanding that in 1982 the Council
at that time decided to look into developing Red Hill and Heritage Parks and that they knew parks would not
be able to be built as they would be on the east side of the City since the west side was for the most part
already built out. For that reason the Council decided to create PD-85 to pay for Red Hill and Heritage
Parks.
James Markman, City Attorney stated that was correct.
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated it should also be noted that all of the neighborhood parks on the east side
of Haven will also be developed through park dedication or park fee requirements of developers and the only
park that was acquired on the east end was Etiwanda Creek Park which is still to be completed. He stated
there was a push on this because the City got one of the last park grants the State was giving in 1986. He
added the City had five years to use these funds which went into the first phase.
Councilmember Williams asked how Etiwanda Creek Park maintenance is paid for.
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated Etiwanda Creek Park is within another assessment district and those funds
are us. ed for maintenance.
Councilmember Williams stated she wanted to point out that this is not a City-wide assessment.
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated that was correct, and that there is no one City-wide assessment district.
City Council Minutes
December 2, 1998
Page 8
Councilmember Biane felt there was a clause in the agreement with Lewis Homes that said the park was
to have a City-wide benefit and if there was a tax going to be created to support the park it would have to
be Citywide.
Rick Gomez, Community Development Director, stated he was not aware of such a clause.
James Markman, City Attorney, stated there could be a provision in the agreement that says the Terra Vista
Planned Community would escape being singled out for the assessment. He stated everything he has read
talks about this being of general benefit to the entire community without exception.
Councilmember Biane stated he is concerned that people may not possibly want to pay for another
assessment for parks if they are already paying into PD-85.
Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public comment. Addressing the City Council was:
Malissa McKeith, 4993 Ginger Cour't, stated that people who bought homes in the Central park area
thought they were going to have a park near them and still do think that. She hoped that people that
fill out the survey will really think about this because those people should have a park. She inquired
when the next task force meeting would be.
Rick Gomez, Community Development Director, stated it would be December 8 at 6:00 p.m. in the Tri
Communities Room.
Councilmember Dutton read as follows in response to Councilmember Biane's question about the taxes from
paragraph 18:
"The City agrees that maintenance and operation costs of the property should be spread City-wide
and will not be allocated solely to Terra Vista residents."
J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
No items were identified for the next meeting.
K1.
K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
Malissa McKeith, 4993 Ginger Court, on behalf of CURE, stated she wants to talk about the
comments that were made last week by the BIA representative and Mr. Christiano particularly with
respect to disclosure obligations relative to the earthquake seismic information. She stated she has
had several phone calls from people since that meeting regarding this. She had information from
MIT which she continued to report. She felt Mr. Christiano's comments created a lot of question in
people's mind.
City Council Minutes
December 2, 1998
Page 9
L. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Biane to adjourn to executive session to discuss Property
Negotiations per Government Code Section 54956.8 for property located at Rochester, between Foothill
Boulevard and Arrow Route; Jerry Fuiwood, Deputy City Manager, negotiating party, regarding Terms of
Payment. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Curatalo absent). The meeting adjourned at 8:00 p.m. No
action was taken in executive session.
Respectfully submitted,
Debra J. Adams, CMC
City Clerk
Approved:
December 16, 1998
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Special Meeting
A. CALL TO ORDER
A special meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday,
December 16, 1998, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic
Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 6:02
p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander.
Present were Councilmembers: Paul Biane, James Curataio, Bob Dutton, Diane Williams,
and Mayor William J. Alexander.
Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, Legal Counsel; Jerry
Fulwood, Deputy City Manager; Rick Gomez, Community Development Director-; Brad
Buller, City Planner; Bill Makshanoff, Building Official; Kevin McArdle, Community Services
Director; Paula Pachon, Management Analyst II; Dave Moore, Recreation Superintendent;
Deborah Clark, Library Director; Chief L. Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire
Protection District; Captain Rodney Hoops, Police Department; Diane O'Neal, Assistant
to the City Manager; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk.
B. ITEMS OF BUSINESS
APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION CERTIFYING MUNICIPAL ELECTION RESULTS
RESOLUTION NO. 98-216
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECITING THE FACT OF THE GENERAL
MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD IN SAID CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ON THE 3"D DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1998, DECLARING THE RESULT
THEREOF AND SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS ARE PROVIDED BY LAW
Special City Council Meeting Minutes
December 16, 1998
Page 2
MOTION: Moved by Dutton, seconded by Williams to approve Resolution No. 98-216.
Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
B2. ADMINISTRATION OF OATHS OF OFFICE - Oaths of Office will be administered by
Superior Court Judge, Dennis G. Cole.
Judge Cole administered the oaths of office to:
Mayor William J. Alexander
Councilmember James Curatalo
Councilmember Diane Williams
B3. SELECTION OF MAYOR PRO-TEM
MOTION: Moved by Curatalo, seconded by Biane to select Diane Williams to serve as
Mayor Pro-Tem. Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
No communication was made from the public.
D. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Moved by Dutton, seconded by Curatalo to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously
5-0. The meeting adjourned at 6:10 p.m. followed by a cake' and punch reception.
Respectfully submitted,
Debra J. Adams, CMC
City Clerk
Approved: *
December 16, 1998
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Reqular Meetin.q
A. CALL TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, December 16, 1998,
in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga,
California. The meeting was called to order at 7:33 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander.
Present were Agencymembers: Paul Biane, James Curatalo, Bob Dutton, Diane Williams, and Mayor
William J. Alexander.
Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City
Manager; Linda Daniels, Redevelopment Agency Director; Rick Gomez, Community Development Director;
Brad Buller, City Planner; Dan Coleman, Principal Planner; Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer; Bill
Makshanoff, Building Official; Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director; Jim Frost, City Treasurer;
Diane O'Neal, Assistant to the City Manager; Chief Denis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection
District; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk.
B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
B1. Presentation of a Certificate of Recognition commending Jimmy Schafer and Amanda Bratvoid of
Alta Loma High School for being selected to play in the Pasadena City Rose Bowl Band.
Students from Alta Loma, Rancho Cucamonga and Etiwanda High Schools were present to receive
certificates for being selected to play and march with the Pasadena City Rose Bowl Honor Band.
B2. Presentation of a Proclamation commending the Pop Warner Panthers Midget Division and Braves
Junior Midget Division on their Mount Baldy Conference Championship and the Pop Warner Eagles on its
American Football Conference (A.F.C.) Division Championship.
All the team members were introduced and certificates were given to everyone. A proclamation was also
presented to Steve Wilkerson for his involvement with Pop Warner.
City Council Minutes
December 16, 1998
Page 2
C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
C1. Jay and Janice Jacobs of Alta Loma since 1990, stated their daughter was bitten by a dog at
Vineyard Junior High School on October 24, 1998. Mr. Jacobs gave a summary of the people he
has talked to about his concerns regarding this incident.
Mayor Alexander offered to meet with him and to put this on the next agenda if Mr. Jacobs would like to.
Mr. Jacobs stated he would like this to come back on the next agenda.
D. CONSENTCALENDAR
D1. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. '11/25/98 and 12/2/98 and Payroll ending 11/18/98 for the total
amount of $2,591,312.36.
D2. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of November 30, 1998.
D3. Approval and execution of a Cooperative Agreement (CO98-069) between the San Bernardino
Associated Governments/San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SANBAG) and the City of
Rancho Cucamonga for the funding of the construction of the Highland Avenue Realignment and the
construction of Day Creek Boulevard (Highland Avenue/Day Creek Boulevard Project).
RESOLUTION NO. 98-217
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE EXECUTION OF THE
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE SAN BERNARDINO
ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS/SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FOR THE PROPOSED DESIGN, FUNDING AND CONSTRUCTION
ADMINISTRATION RESPONSIBILITIES OF HIGHLAND AVENUE/DAY CREEK
BOULEVARD PROJECT
D4. Approval to authorize the Advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the construction of the Highland
Avenue Realignment and the construction of Day Creek Boulevard from Highland Avenue to Base Line
Road to be funded from Account No. 32-4637-9710 and Account No. 22-4637-9710.
RESOLUTION NO. g8-218
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
THE CONSTRUCTION OF HIGHLAND AVENUE REALIGNMENT AND THE
CONSTRUCTION OF DAY' CREEK BOULEVARD FROM HIGHLAND AVENUE TO
BASE LINE ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING
AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
City Council Minutes
December 16, 1998
Page 3
D5. Approval to declare Surplus Miscellaneous City-Owned Equipment.
D6. Approval to appropriate $27,000 from the Data Processing Replacement Reserve to fund the
Library's LAN Network project.
D7. Approval of Parcel Map, Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security and Ordering the
Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and
2 for Parcel Map 15170, located on the east side of Hellman, north of Wilson, submitted by Hillside Cove
Associates, LLC.
RESOLUTION NO. 98-219
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NO. 15170,
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY
RESOLUTION NO. 98-220
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN
TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR PARCEL MAP 15170
D8. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to
Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 3 for Tract
15766, located on Base Line Road, approximately 800' west of Victoria Park Lane, submitted by R. C.
Apartments L.L.C., a Developer.
RESOLUTION NO. 98-221
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT MAP NUMBER 15766
RESOLUTION NO. 98-222
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN
TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 AND STREET
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 3 FOR TRACT MAP NUMBER
15766
D9. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for the Installation of a Master Plan
Storm Drain System relating to Tract 14534-2, located in Victoria Park Lane, east of Rochester Avenue,
submitted by William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California Corporation.
City Council Minutes
December 16, 1998
Page 4
RESOLUTION NO. 98-223
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR THE INSTALLATION OF A MASTER
PLAN STORM DRAIN SYSTEM RELATING TO TRACT 14534-2
D10. Approval to reject all bids for the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Canopy Addition Project because
the bids substantially exceed the Engineer's Estimate.
D11. Approval to award and authorization for execution of Contract (CO98-070) for the construction of
landscaping and irrigation for the Haven Avenue Beautification Project between Base Line Road and Church
Street, to be funded from Beautification Funds, Account No. 21-4647-9709.
D12. Approval to accept the Senior Center Parking Lot Expansion Project, Contract No.98-008, as
complete, Release the Bonds, and authorize the City Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion" and approve
the final contract amount of $157,761.95.
RESOLUTION NO. 98-224
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR
THE SENIOR CENTER PARKING LOT EXPANSION PROJECT, CONTRACT NO.
98-008 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR
THE WORK
D 13. Approval to accept the traffic signal lighting at the intersection of Arrow Route and Red Oak Avenue,
Contract No. 98-022, as complete, Release the Bonds, and authorize the City Engineer to file a "Notice of
Completion" and approve the final contract amount of $119,373.00.
RESOLUTION NO. 98-225
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR
TRAFFIC SIGNAL LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF ARROW ROUTE AND
RED OAK AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. 98-022 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING
OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
D14. Approval to accept the Tapia Via Street Improvements, from Grove Avenue to Rancheria Street,
Contract No. 98-012, as complete, Release the Bonds, and authorize the City Engineer to file a "Notice of
Completion" and approve the final contract amount of $195,194.41.
City Council Minutes
December 16, 1998
Page 5
RESOLUTION NO. 98-226
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR
TAPIAVlA STREET IMPROVEMENTS, FROM GROVE AVENUE TO RANCHERIA
STREET, CONTRACT NO. 98-012 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A
NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
D15. Approval to accept the Spruce Park Skate Park, Contract No. 98-032, as complete, Release the
Bonds, and authorize the City Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion" and approve the final contract
amount of $120,079.80
RESOLUTION NO. 98-227
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR
THE SPRUCE AVENUE SKATE PARK, CONTRACT NO. 98-032, AND
AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
D16. Approve of the improvements, Release the Faithful Performance Bond, and file a "Notice of
Completion" for improvements for PM 15074, located on the north side of La Vine Street 230 feet east of
Hellman Avenue, submitted by Mr. Denning M. Perdew, Executor for the estate of John L. Perdew.
RESOLUTION NO. 98-228
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR
PARCEL MAP 15074, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
MOTION: Moved by Dutton, seconded by Curatalo to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports
contained in the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0.
E. CONSENT ORDINANCES
El. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND.VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN
AMENDMENT 98-03 - RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELQPMENT AGENCY - A request to change the
Victoria Community Plan Land Use Map from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and
Community Facility to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for 17 acres of land on the north
side of Base Line Road, approximately 1,300 feet east of the intersection of Rochester Avenue - APN: 0227-
091-18 through 21. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration.
E1 and E2. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the titles of Ordinance Nos. 592 and 593.
City Council Minutes
December 16, 1998
Page 6
ORDINANCE NO. 592 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN
AMENDMENT 98-03, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY
PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS
PER ACRE) AND COMMUNITY FACILITY TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8
DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 17 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE
NORTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 1,300 FEET EAST OF
THE INTERSECTION OF ROCHESTER AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0227-091-18 THROUGH 21
E2. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN
AMENDMENT 98-04- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to change the Victoria Community Plan
Land Use Map from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Residential (4-8
dwelling units per acre) for approximately 6 acres of land on the north side of Base Line Road, approximately
1,100 feet east of the intersection of Rochester Avenue and for 2 ½ acres of land approximately 2,000 feet
east of the intersection of Rochester Avenue- APN: 0227-091-22, 25, and 43. Staff has prepared a Negative
Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration.
ORDINANCE NO. 593 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN
AMENDMENT 98-04, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY
PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS
PER ACRE)TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE)
FOR 6 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD,
APPROXIMATELY 1,100 FEET EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF ROCHESTER
AVENUE AND FOR 2 Y2 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF
BASE LINE ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 2,000 FEET EAST OF THE INTERSECTION
OF ROCHESTER AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -
APN: 0227-091-22, 25, AND 43
MOTION: Moved by Dutton, seconded by Curatalo to waive full reading and approve Ordinance Nos. 592
and 593. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0.
F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
Fl. CONSIDERATION OF CODE AMENDMENTS REGARDING GRADING REVIEW AND TIME
EXTENSIONS - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Staff report presented by Dan Coleman, Principal Planner.
The City Council asked various questions about this item.
City Council Minutes
December 16, 1998
Page 7
Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council were:
Alex Cabral, Attorney for applicant, read a statement for the record which is on file in the City Clerk's
office and was distributed to the City Council. He felt all projects should be heard on a case-by-case
basis. He reported Riverside County and Fontana have already adopted this into their ordinances.
Rick Ewing, Aliso Viejo, stated they are in the process of doing a plan modification. He stated they
have run out of time to complete their final map and need more time.
Kai Risen of Rancho Cucamonga felt if this is approved it would tie up the land just to allow the
developer more time getting the project ready. He felt a developer should have to re-file their project
when their time is up.
There being no further comments, public hearing was closed.
Councilmember Biane asked if there was something that could be done to only allow one year extension.
James Markman, City Attorney stated page 90, subsection C in the packet could have a different number put
in.
Brad Buller, City Planner, stated the Planning Commission was adamant about a maximum of five years.
Mayor Alexander stated he would like to see the time extensions given as long as they are reviewed.
Councilmember Williams stated she felt the state should never have given the extension to three years
because she felt the City might change their mind about what they would like to see for a certain area and
that it might not be compatible with what is proposed for the area.
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No 594.
ORDINANCE NO. 594 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 15, CHAPTER 15.12 OF THE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING REVIEW OF GRADING
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Alexander to change subsection c on page 90 to state that an
extension shall not exceed five (5) years as opposed to two (2), to waive full reading and set second reading
for January 6, 1999. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0.
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 595.
City Council Minutes
December 16, 1998
Page 8
ORDINANCE NO. 595 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 16 OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING THE EXTENSION OF
SUBDIVISION MAPS
MOTION: Moved by Dutton, seconded by Curatalo to waive full reading and set second reading for January
6, 1999. Motion carried 3-2 (Dutton and Williams voted no).
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 596.
ORDINANCE NO. 596 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT
98-01, AMENDING SECTION 17.02.100 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA
DEVELOPMENT CODE, REGARDING LAPSE OF APPROVALS AND
EXTENSIONS
MOTION: Moved by Dutton, seconded by Curatalo to waive full reading and set second reading for January
6, 199. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0.
No Items Submitted.
No Items Submitted.
G. PUBLIC HEARINGS
H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
I1. DISCUSSION OF CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEES, SUBCOMMITTEES AND COMMISSIONS
Staff report presented by Jack Lam, City Manager.
Mayor Alexander stated he did not think there was a need to go through this since it had recently been done
after the June election.
The Council concurred.
City Council Minutes
December 16, 1998
Page 9
MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Curatalo to leave the subcommittees as was submitted. Motion
carried unanimously, 5-0.
12. RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SIGNAGE TASK FORCE
Staff report presented by Brad Buller, City Planner.
Councilmember Williams stated she hoped they will also go after businesses that put merchandise out in the
parkways.
MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Biane to approve the subcommittee's recommendation. Motion
carried unanimously, 5-0.
13. PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES UPDATE
A. PARKS & FACILITIES UPDATE
1. Rancho Cucamonga Family Sports Center
2. Rancho Cucamonga Public Library
3. Stadium
4. Spruce Avenue Park Skate Facility
5. Heritage Park
Etiwanda Creek Park
7. Central Park
B. COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE
1. Seniors
2. Teens
3. Youth Activities
4. Youth Sports
5. Rancho Cucamonga Family Sports Center
6. Adult Sports
7. Facilities
8. The Grapevine
9. Contract Classes
10. Community-wide Specia~ Events
11. Proposed Boxing Program
12. Senior Transportation Program
13. Trips and Tours
14. Human Services
15. Park and Recreation Commission
16. Epicenter
Councilmember Williams stated Ruth Musser Middle School would like Kevin McArdle to come out to their
school and speak to them about how they can help with the skate park. She said this is part of a leadership
pro§ram they have.
City Council Minutes
December 16, 1998
Page 10
Kevin McArdle, stated he would be happy to do this.
J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
No items were identified for the next meeting.
K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
No communications were made from the public.
L. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Curatalo to recess to the conclusion of the Fire District meeting for
an executive session to discuss:
A. PROPERTY CLAIM SETTLEMENT PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR
PROPERTY LOCATED AT BERYL, BETVVEEN 19TM STREET AND HIGHLAND; LARRY TEMPLE,
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR, NEGOTIATING PARTY, REGARDING PRICE AND
TERMS OF PAYMENT.
B. PROPERTY NEGOTIATIONS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY
LOCATED ON ETIWANDA AVENUE AND VICTORIA AVENUE, NEGOTIATING-PARTY BRAD
BULLER, REGARDING TERMS OF AGREEMENT
The meeting recessed at 8:52 p.m. No action was taken in executive
Motion carried unanimously, 5-0.
session.
Respectfully submitted,
Debra J. Adams, CMC
City Clerk
Approved: **
~635
?
.1785
b231
laao
~07
21o0~
~0~
33
Z0~99
~0~93
~772
ZlO~
~zO0
21001
5J6 ~
~0~a
~3
~o~
3F RANCH] CUCAMONGA
LIST J~ wARRANTS
PcRld2: 12-16-9B (98/99)
RUN DATE: 12/16/'J8 PIGE: 1
NAME ITEM O~SCRIPIION WARR NO WARR. AMTo
-~.~- CHECK# OVERLAP
HAITEglNK ASPHALT PAVING. INC. ~-CR~ATION R~-FUND 13~]3~0 900.00
((( I 34335 - 13~595
A ~ g PHOTOGRAPHY P~OTO C~VELOPING ~ SUPPLIES ~ 13~96
k D T SeCURelY S~RV[CES~ ZNC. ALARH S~RV~C~ 13AS97 2dZ.00
A-CO SANITATION EaUIPMENT RENTAL 134598 131.68
A. G. ENGIN~RtNu PROFLSSIONAL SERVICES 13~599 231.15
AdC LOCKSMITHS ~AINTENANCE SUPPLIES e 134000
ACTION ART RECREATION SUPPLIES 13~2 T60.72
AEF SYSTEMS CONSULT[NG~ ~NC. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 13~603
A~RTOUCU C~LLULAR C~LLULAR ?HONE &[LL~NGS ~ 13~605
ALPHAGRAPH ZC S OFF~C: SUPPL ~S 136607 2~.99
AMERICAN 5USINL~S FJRMS O~FICL ~UPPLiLS 13~60& 502.55
AR~OR NURSERY INC. HAINTCNANCE SUPPLIES 136610 ZOb. S8
ASSOCIATED ENGINLLR~ PR~cSSION~L ~RVICtS 13~61~
~ & K LLECT~[C WHOLESALL MAINTENANCE SUPPLILS ~ 134615 6~'~69.7~
BARNE~ ~ NOULE LIdRARy SUPPLi~ ~ 13~616
BA~LL[NE TRUE VALUL HARDwAge HAINT~NANCL SUPPLIES 13k017
~AC~AH PU~LI~ING CO~P. k~CR:ATZON K~FUND 13~618
BELL ~ HOdELL P~FESS[ONAL S~RV~Ct ~345Z0
~ELLSOUTH wIR~LLSS DATA COMMUNICATION CHA~GE e lAiEZl 4,172.98
6~T UUY CJ.~ INC. ~FIC~ SUPPLILS 1]~622 236.86
BLAK~ PAPER CO.s INC. ~CRE~TI~N SUPFLIES e 13~23 56.7~
6LUNKt LAU~I~ RLCA~AT!gN R~FUNO 13~,,2e Z~.00
<<< 1 3~626 - 134020
BRODART ud~5 LIbRARV SUPPLICS ~ 13452? 1,T9~.5~
~uDZAK, J~NNIFu~ gLCg~AIIJN R~FUNO 1.3~629 13.00
~YRD ~NO i~SOCIAT~'J, INC. R.M. P~OFCSSION~L S~RVICES 134631 ]50.00
C.G.A. MAINT~NANC! ~UPPLI~S 13~532
C.H. PAXNTiNG PRO~ZSSIgNAL SSRV[CES X3e633
CAGLE'S APPLIANC~ 6USINc. SS LiCENSL REFUND 13q63q 36.00
CAL CDV~ P~uCT~ a~CREATI)N SUPPLItS ~ 13~&35 275.00
CALIFORNIA JGURNAL ~Ub~CRIPTION 134o3e 39.95
C~NTRAL CITIES ~[uN SLAV[CL ~A[NT~N~NCL 5UPPL[[S J 13~637 3,259.1Z
CHAFFLY JOINT UNION H.S. DISTRICT RENTAL- AUDITrJdlUH R.C.H.S. 13~38 35.00
CHANEY, VlRulNia RECKrRTION REFUND 13~b39 1~.00
CITY RENTAL~ L~UJPHLNT AcNTAL/SUPPL[~ J 13~1 ~.00
CLAYTON~ JANiC~ C~PJ* ,~:TiN:, 13~4 100.00
RUN DATE: 1Z/16/)n PAGE: Z
ITEM C~SCRIPTION W~RR NO WARR.
¥EN~0R NAME
134052 13,583.71
134653 ½9.~.
13465½ 41.50
134055 25,$00.80
134b56 ~,613.00
13~657 52.00
13~659 5~5.33
134600 ~5.71
13~6bl
13~b~Z 12~.74
1346~3
13~666 Zl.O0
13~B 1,577.17
13~669 16~.93
136670 10.00
1~46~1
1]~72 13,885.~0
13~673 47.52
13~7~ 38.00
1~8675 Zg.3Z
13~017 1,060.00
134G~8 >>>
1]~679
134680 ZO.00
134682 85Z.Z7
1346d3
134684 33J.~9
134635 76.60
134086 16~243.57
13~687 1~938.55
134~8 65J.65
~34689 ]96.Z6
134690 341.55
1 3~691 u. O0
136692 160.93
134693 37.00
13~694 Z~12.50
13~695
13& 696
13~697 11.00
134696
IJ4o78 -
95 CuCAMONGA go wAT~g 313T MONTHLY wAT£R gILLiNGS
~4 DAISY wNL:L RI6BON COl INC OFFIL~ 5UPPLIEa
36517 OAYRIT, ROM¥ R~CREATION ~cFbND
&O DELTA DENTAL DENTAL INSURANCE
105 DERBXSH GUgRRA L ASSOC. CONTRACT SEREICE
J0518 DDPP, JOANNE ~ECRcATION R~FdNG
· 7T ~ S R It INC. SDFT~aR£ SUPP~R/ FEES
3364 EIGHTH AVENUE GRAPHICS OFFItc SUPPLIES
Z~Z ELECTRONICS WAK~H~U~E ~LLCTR3NIC ~UPPLI~$
~167 ~LiTE pLR$CNL~L S~gVIC~S, INC. PLRSDNN~L SLR¥IC~5
lZSt ~LLLSs JAN~ ~LiM~U~S~McNT
~651V E~UIVEL, VILK; R:CR:ATZ~N R~FUNJ
2Z~ EWIN~ IRR!GATI£N PR3DU£T~ i~RIGATI3N SUPFL~:S
~ ~XCLU~VE LMAGLS ~FFICt SUPPLICS
3643~ FAHR~S, CH~I~TiN: RECREATION R:FUN~
~762 FOOTHILL FAMILY SHLLT:~ PAMIL¥ SHLLT~R
g~40 F~RD 3F UPLANd, INC. V~XCL~ MAINTENANCE
1082 FRANKLIN £C¥~Y C~. O[FIC: SUPPLIES
35520 GILLILAND, SUPHI RECREATION RLFUN~
36521 GJERDE, LAURA R~CREATION REFUND
3JSd GOLDEN ~EAR ARaORISTS~ INC. PRbFESSIONAL ScR¥ICES
5955 GOLDEN wEST ~ISTRIL~TIN5 RLCg~TIgN CUPPLIeS
3o$2~ G3NZALEZ~ MARIA R~C~EATIJN REFUND
~b~Z~ GReeN ROCK Ga~;_NS, LN~. LUSIN~LS LICtNS~ REFUND
3O523 GRIMMs CYNTHIA ~C2LATI~N RLPUNG
~JeT GST T£LECOH CALIPgRqIA INT:RNET ~g~¥1CES
~37 GTE CALIFOKNIA M~NTHL¥ TELEPHONE ~ILLINGS
.31091 MAOD8CK, LAURI£ PARKING CITATION
Z~55 HAVEN WINE & LiqUOR C3. $UE-COMMIITEE MEETINGS
~6£ HCS-CUTLE~ STc[L CO. E~UIPMENT MAINTENANCE
4124 HI-WAY ~AFLT¥~ INC. MA[NT~NANC~ SUPPLIES
616 HIOHSM~TH COsINE. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
~gZ~ HOCKEY WEST RLCRcATION
4150 HOLIDAY PRINTING PRINTING OF THE GRAPEVINE
~5& HOLLIDA¥ ROCK C~.t INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
403~ HOME DEPOT CRLu/T S£RVIC~ MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
1Z3~ HOSEMAN MA[NTENANC~ SUPPLIES
312~9 HUBBARD~ PHILLIP MiSC
JX~98 HUNT~R, DONNA RECREATIGN
~95 HTORO-SCAPE PNJCUCTS~ INC LAN~SCAP~ MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
03½ I C M A M6M~£RSHIP OURS
3136 INLAND EMP/Rt SOCCL2 R~F~RE6 ASSN. McN°S S3CCER PROGRAM
~08 INLAND MEUIATIgN oGAg£ LAKOLORD/T£NANT &iSPUIE RESDL.
9~ INLANO ¥ALLEY DAILY ~ULLETIN SUE~CRIPTI~NS
5110~ JiM;~[, KAThLeEN RECR£ATIO~
3110~ dO ~L~T R~CKcATI~N
CZTI OF RANCHO CUCAMdNGA
LIST OF WARRANTS
FCk ~ZRIUD: 12-1o-9a
RUN DATE: lZ/l~/ga
VENOOR NAME ITeM D£SCR[PTION ~ARR NO WARE. AMT.
KADER, INTISAR A~DLL
RARATSU,
KASTEINER~ ELAINE
KNOX
POOPMAN B~0S. FUrNiTURe, INC.
K~RANDA CONSIRUCT~ON
KRAU~ CONSTRUCTION CO.
L S A ASSOCIATES, INC.
LAIRD CONSTRUCTION CU
LANCEr SOLE & LUNGHARg
LANDSCAPE W~ST~
~1105 LARS DENN~RT
603a LECLA~, INC.,
~79 LEWIS ~OMES
~864 LiL~URN CORPORATION
310~6 LIN* WEN S~UNu
31102 LIMDSa¥~ TORI
1~55 LONG°S 0RUGS
3~43~ LOS ANGELE3 UUS:r4E~ J~URN~L
~lOd9 MARiM~A & MOR~
4727 MARSHALL PLUM~ ~G
J10~4 MCCA~£ ~ CHRiSTIN:
3LlOO M~RINO,
o02 METER, PAT
31067 MICHA~L*S SICRE ~ 13019
219a MICHAELS STO~ES INC. W~019
7*9 N~JAC ALAgk CCMPANT
4~7~ MOBILE STJRAG~ GROUP,
~11U1 M]M~£Rb, LiSA ..
31095 MORALES, SUCORRO
310~Z MUIRm TAMARA
2~46 NAPA AUTO FARTS
547~ NIGHTLINE SECURITI PATROL
OFFICE OLPgT
OMNITRANS
~RA~G~ COUNT¥ STRIPING SVC, INC.
OWEN ELLCIViC
PARAGON dULLbINC PR3CUCT~
PERVO PAINT CO.
PICKENS FULL CORP.
POMA ~IST~Lo~TING C~
P~AXAIR ~ISTR[SUT~GN,
PRAXAIR DI~TRIcUT[CNt INC.
PR~T£CTiON S~R~C~ INDuST2i:S
PAUD6NTIAL C~ERALL SUPPLY
PuTMAN,
~51 A & R AuTJHOT[¥.
~.~. Ct~FCK~ OVERLAP
RECREATION 134699 13.00
Rg IMdURSEMLNT 134700 78.55
RFCR.r-ATION 134701 13.00
HA INTLNANCE SUPPLIES 134702 37.73
R~CR~ATION REFUNG 13~103 ~2.17
~LEASE OF DgP~SiT 134705 1,000.00
PRGF~S~XONAL S~qV~CES e 134706 15p991.~9
PROFE~S~0NAL ~RViCES 134707 Z48.67
aU0~T SE~V~CES 13~708 1,~00.00
LANDSCAPE MAZNTEN~NC~ a I 3~709 10Z,5~9.03
RECReATiON 1347%0 13.00
REFUND ~EPOSI/ 134711 500.00
~ECREA~IUN REFUND 13a712 Z96.31
REFUNU OF OEVELOPMENT FEES 13471~ 1,000.00
P~OF~ SSIONAL SERVICES ~ 13~71k 2p565.20
CL ~IM~ ] 3~ 71 5 311.ga
~cCREAT~ON 134716 ~.00
FILM P~C~SSIN~ 13471? 35.7Z
5u~SCRIPT[gN 13~718 39.95
6US~N~SS LICENSE 1~47~9 9.83
~EH~6. PROGRA~ · 1347Z0 305.53
R~Cg[AT:Q~ 234721 2~.00
~CREATIDN 134722 IZl.00
RE[M:~URS~MENT FOR 5UPPLL~5 134723 50.~0
RECHcAT~0N SUPPLieS e 134125 91.8o
ALARM SERVLCL~ 1S4126 300.0 0
~CREATION I 34729 13.00
RECRLATION 1347J0 47.00
<<( 13473% - 13~7J1
V~H~CL~ ~A~NT~NANC~ ~ 13473Z 939.15
S~CUR~TY SLRV~C~ w 13~733 10,13d.00
O~FZCf :UPPLZ[S ~ ~3~36 Z~8~9.46
dOS PA~SES 13~737
BUSINESS LICENSE 13~738 3,203.10
MA:NT:NANCE SUPPLtLS ~ 13~739 10,~30.16
CONCR:IL SUPPLIE3 13~7~0 13~.50
MAXNTSNANCL SUPPLILS a 134741 5,}s.a6
oUS~Nt:SS LLCLNS[ 134142 ~.0~
V~HICLC MAINTENANCE C SUPPLIES
MA[NT/R.CR~A[I~N ~UPPLI[ S ~ 1~6744 100.00
E ~UIPM~NT ~:NT~L 134 ?~5
PgdTcCT~ :C2V:C=S-LI~NS CNTR
MAINT zNANC6 SUPPLIES ~ 134747 91.0o
WANo CCMFUT:R 5E~ViC~ 1~47~8 ~S.Z4
V=MICLL ~IA :NT, SUPPL I ~ SCS~V[C ~ m 13~750
PAGE:
CITY 2f' R2NCHJ CUCAMJNGA
Li~T ~F W~RkANTS
NAME
R 1. g LT, GHT[N:,
R E T SPcC;.ALT¥~
RIV~R~XDE LLUdFR~T
SAFeLITE GLASS
S~N g~RNARGINa COUNTY
S~N g~RNARgINQ COUNTY SUN
SANIA F~ ~P~iNGS~ LITY dF
SCHWAAG. [NC.
SCLIN/JERR Y LDWARCS
S~a~b TECh. FA[RCHILO T~LSCO/,I~
SIGN SH~Pp
SIMON ~ SCHUSTER
5MART ~ FINAL
Smll., PATRICIA
.~NC
S~ CALIP L~,ISON CO.
S3 CAgIF GAS CO.
50 CALXF MUNICIPAL AT~IL~.TIC FeD, INC
SdUTHERN CALIFORNIA LDTSON
STEELWORK, RS OLDT~M:.RS FL~UNDATION
STEELWOAKLRS OLDTIH~RS FOUNDATION
SI[~ICYCL~. INC.
SULLIVAN ~ G~ORGXNA
SU [HERLAND. STtPHEN
TARGET
TECHNIC
TERMZN~ INtERNATiONAL P
11189 TOWNSEND-S ANCHE:. RHONda
~!55 U.S. BANK TRUST
~l~d UNDERGRQUN~ S9C. ALERT ~F SQ. CALLF
SbOl UNiqUe ~ANA~E~LNT ~SRVLCESt INC.
lZZ6 UNITED PARCEL $~RVICE
11190 URBAN LiBRAR[~S COUNC[L
4114 VPD
· 78 ~ARREN ~ CO.~ CaRL
11i91 WATER TEC~NdLdG~ TRAINING PROuRAMS
w~ST COAST LIbeRTY SAFLS
WESTERN PO~ER S~STL~
xCROX CORP dKA T I'JN
ZO JOURNAL ~
~EF -DICAL SERVICe
:::.':: CHECKer OV~;~LAP
HA iNTr. NANC: S ~.~VI£E/SUPPLIES 134751
U.A.R.=. SUPPLIES 13475Z
gLCR~ ~TIO% SUFPLI~S m 13~153 ITb. 53
CMPLGV~-CITI ~ONTR[:~UTI 3N 1~7~ 500.O0
PLAN CHECK ~:RV[CE~ 134155 56GmOO0.00
PRINTS 13~756 212.Z7
M]NTHLY S~ViC= 134758 3.210,~0
CAL-ID PROL.~ ~ 13~159 lib.60
~UBSC~IP TI~N 13~760 63.03
LITERACY PkdGkAH i34761 300.00
LIuRAAY SUPPLX~ S 13~76Z ~9.50
SUPPLIES 13~7o3 30.8Z
~EMBZR~HIP R[N{WAL~gd/99 13~764 100.00
T~LEPHCNE SERViCes
~AINT SUPPLILS 13~ 766 lo.16
L~eRARY SUPPLIE ~ 1]~767 10~.05
UAW CAMP SUPPLIng e 13~1~8 ~33.J0
R~C~CATION ~FUN~S I 3~769 3.00
<<< 134770- 13~770 >>>
H~NTUL~ ELECTRIC ~ILLXNGS ~ 13~711 ~lj/dS.93
~iG/~TRATIJN m 13477~ 100.OO
M~NTULY ~LLCTR[C ~ILLS
~CR~AIION ~UPPLLcS 13~779
OLOTINLR~ FdUNDAT[ON 134781 666.G ~
SHARPS PRJ~RAM 13~78Z 2,970.1Z
R~CR2ATION REFUNDS 13418J SO.00
CERT [NSTRUCTOR 13&78~ 100.00
WOUTH ~ROG~A~ ~ DAY CA~P SUPPC m 13~18~ 52.33
OFFICe SUPPLIES 13~786 Z~5.00
NdNTHLY P~ST CONTROL ~ERVICE ~ i34787 l,OT5.00
TO IT I,JN R~ INBURSEMCNT 13~788 IS0.00
RECREATION
LgASE PAYMENT e 13~790 Zp875.00
UNDERbROUNU SERVICE ALERT 13~791 ZXZ.7S
UPS SCRVICE 13~793 ZZ.00
SEMinAR ~GZSTRATLON 13~79~
LX~RARW SUPPL~E S ~ 134795 54.38
3USINESS LIC[NS~ REFUNDS 13~97 45.00
MAINT ~UPPLI~ t 13~79a ~5~.36
SAFL [3~7~9 ~5.00
WEST END KIDS PRO~RAM 134~00 le621.50
COHPUTER UPbRADE e 134301 165.00
SU3SCRIPTI JN 13~903 ~'~.00
RCCR[ AI~:JN SUPPLIES l~J~ ~O.Jl
CITY OF RANCHO CU( ~A'
LIST OF WARRAN,-
FOR PERIOD: 12-09-98
RUN DATE: 1~/0~/~8 PAQE:
VENDOR Ndg~ME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMT.
## CHECKe OVERLAP
3016 RANCHO CUC~d'IQ'IOA POLICE DEPT REIMBURSEMENT 129550# 11,500. O0
<<C 129551 - 130579
103 I C M A RETIRrMENT TRUST-457 DEFERRED CONP 130580- 1,410. 00-
<<< 130581 - 130657
103 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUST-457 DEFERRED COMP 130658e 1,428.00
33 BASELINE TRUE VAL~JE HARDI4ARE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 133~- 126.63-
CCC 133285 - 133887
2737 U.C. REOENTS POCKET QUIDE 133~S~ 432.00-
~117 EMPIRE I'10BILE HO!IE SERVICE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES # 134170
(<~ 134171 - 134192
158 I'~LIDAY ROCK CO., INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIER # 134193- 2, 100. 67-
<<< 134194 - 134~12
6050 JOSEPH FILIPPI WINERY RECREATION REFUND 134213- 150 00-
((4 134214 - 134246
53~3 OMLOR, AMY COMMUNITY SERVICES ENTERTAINMT 134247 54.00-
<<< 134248 - 1342~6
261 ~ BERI~DINO COUNTY PRINTING & MAIL SERVICES 134~7 35. 10-
(~( 134298 - 134334
5593 W~LTON-CORTES, LIB~ RECREATIDN REFUNDS 134335# 54. O0
5903 SOt. IS, EDk~RD CONTRACT SERVICES 13433~- ~50. O0
CC( 134337 - 13433~
5956 tO0~ SOCCER RECREATION SUPPLIES 134339 30.00
<<( 134340 - 134340
2732 ARC LOCKF~qITHS M&INTEN~E SUPPLIES # 134341 lO, 520~ 33
3070 ASS(]LUTE ASPHiM. T, INC. M~INTENANCE REPAIRS 134342 6.00
3785 ACTION ~RT RECREATION SUPPLIES 134343
20977 AL'S I'VE REMODELING BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 134344 77.40
20994 ALTER, MICHELE RECREATION REFUND 134345 1000
2097~ ~JqECI PIZZA & PASTA IN & (~./T BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 134346 ~2. 03
1430 AMERICAN BUSINESS FORMS OFFICE SUPPLIES 134347 1,546.75
6052 ~d'tERICAN CABLE ENTERTAINMENT ADVERTISINQ FEE 134348 633. 60
4450 ~MIERICAN LIBRARY A~BOCIATION OFFICE SUPPLIES 134349
492 ~MERICAN PLANNING i~M~OCIATION APA MEMSERSHIP DUES 1343~0 214.00
20982 AMERICAN WEST FINANCIAL BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 134351 9. 80
20980 AMERICAN HGfiLD FINANCIAL OROUPo INC BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 134352 14. 50
5206 ~dlS, INC. NEWSLETTER 134353 2,727. 16
20991 ANDERSON, 5HERYL SECURITY DEPOSIT REFUND 134354 200.00
5321 d~OLLO HOOD RECOVERY, INC. SUPPLIES & SERVICE # 1343~5 309. 41
2~99 ARROH TRAILER SUPPLIES M~INTENANCE SUPPLIES 1343~6 549.60
310 ARROt4 TRUCK BODIES & E~UIP INC M~INTENANCE SUPPLIES # 1343~7 817.82
6051 ARTWORK BY ~d~DRE RECREATION REFUND 1343~B 100.00
2437 ASSOCIATED GROUP, THE MONTHLY M~INTEN~NCE SERVICE # 134359 1, 535. O0
20981 ATCO TECHN~OQY, INC. BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 134360 10. O0
3977 AUTODESK, INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES # 134361 6,678. 35
4102 B & K ELECTRIC WHOLES~LE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 134362 44. 63
6053 BARKER, DAVID BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 134363 341.55
33 BASELINE TRUE V~M,UE H~RDW~RE M~INTENANCE SUPPLIES # 134364 286. 90
43~3 BELLSOUTH HIRELESS D~TA COMMUNICATION CHARGE # 134365 3,609.77
20983 BENCHMARK BUSINESS SYSTEMS, INC. BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 134366 23. 50
lilly HF NANCItI! CUCANONOA'
LI~! OF WARRANTS
FOR PERIOD: i~-09-98 (98/99)
RUN DATE: 12/09/98 PA~E: 2
VENDOR NAIfE iTEH DESCRiPTiON ~ARR NO HARR. AIIT.
ee CHECK# OVERLAP
4441 BEST BUY CO., iNC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 1343~7 23. O0
20984 B~OTECH PLUS+ BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 134368 4002
i247 BL~KE PAPER CO., INC. RECREATION ~UPPLIES 134369 2~. 07
b~b BL~IN, L.L.C., N.F. RECR~T]~ REF~D e 134370 155. 11
~0992 B~IN, ~ RECR~T;~ REF~D 134371
20975 BRAD~, ~ CLA REi~BENENT 134372 94.97
134373 - 134373
4369 BRO~T B~S LiBR~Y 5~PLIES e 1~374 2,340.06
6054 B~1~88 PRE~B 8~RIPTI~ RENE~ 1~37~
97 C~IF.P~K k RECR~TI~ ~IETY, INC REOIBTR~T[~ 13q376 747.~
2098~ C~IF~HIA CHIR~TIC ~P~Y, I~. B~I~B8 LICE~E REF~D 134377 40. O0
43~6 C~IF~NIA ~ CBB ~INTE~E B~PLIEB 134378 29~.
4~8~ C~IF~N[~ TR~~ VEHICLE ~;NTE~NCE ~3437~ t, 59~. A7
1223 C~SE~E ~F[CE/~iNTE~E EQUiPHENT e 134~
b02t C~CO'S V~ET CLE~R5 RECREATI~ REF~D ~ 2~. O0
2~ C~FEY BE~FiT F~ RETiRE~NT P~TY e ~34~ ~.~
20~78 C~EL Q. C~[CAT[~8, iNC. B~i~SB LICE~E REFUND ~34~3 40.
~90 C~E, RO~RT RECR~T[~ REF~D t~4
4~ CHEVR~ U B A. l~ OA~I~ CHAROEB 134~ ~7.
713 CHICK'B ~TI~ ~ I~ RECREAT]~ S~PLIES 1~
20986 CHI~ PO]NT B~]NE~ LICENSE REFUND 134~7 ~0.
~9~8 CHirRS ~DZO B~B L]BR~Y SUPPLIES 134~ 19. ~0
74 CITY R~T~ E~[P~NT RENT~/S~PL[ES 1~ ~64. 44
4279 CL~K, DEB~ REi~gE F~ B~]NESS EXPENSE 1343~ 98.
2~79 C~i~ ~ECTRIC B~i~BB LICE~E REF~D 1~1
643 C~UTERL~ C~UTER M]NTE~E/~PLZES ~34~2 360.96
<~< 134394 - 1343~6
MONTHLY HATER BILLiNOS # 134397
BUSINESS L[CENSE REFUND # 134395
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 134399
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 134400
M~INTENANCE REPAIRS/SUPPLiES # 134401
OFFICE SUPPLIES # 13440~
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES # 134403
OFFICE SUPPLIES 134404
STRON~ NOTION FEE 13440~
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES # i34406
OFFlCE SUPPLIES 134407
VEHICLE HAiNTENANCE 134408
OFFICE SUPPLIES 134409
SUBSCRiPTiON i34410
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND i34411
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 134412
C.E.P.E TRAINING 134413
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 1344i4
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND I34415
REFUND 134416
RECREAT]UN RENTAL # 1344i7
PROFESS[ONAL SERV]CES # 134418
OFFICE SUPPLIES # 134419
85 CUCAMON~ CO H~TE.q DIST 10,732.
6040 CUCAMONgA FLOWER COI~ANY 183. i7
20987 CUC~3NQA PRODUCTS 34.
~0988 CUSTOM ~ET4M- FABRZCATI~IS
4282 D 7 QROU~, INC. 3,~.~0
4~4~ DATA2, INC. 756.87
~121 DE VOOQHT, SCOTT d. 510.00
4366 DEHCO0 INC. ~51. 59
3909 DEPARTMENT OF CONSeRVATioN 5,943.00
4553 DESIGN HEST
t07 DETCO ~0. S1
839 DIETERICH iNTERNATiONAL TRUCK
~809 DiETERICH-POST COMPANY
5744 DIRECT TV
36507 DISCOUNT LIGUOR H~REHOUSE 4a. 70
36508 DOUBLE CRANE ENTERPRISE (USA) CO. 44. 75
36509 DOUGLAS BEAMAN ASSOCIATES 50. O0
36510 DSR COMPANY 37. 56
36511 DUTTON & ASSOCIATE~, INC. 12. 50
5889 DUTTON, BOB 341.
779 E-Z RENT8 1,311.~
5916 ED BUILDING MAINTENANCE 8,360.00
3364 EIGHTH AVENUE GRAPHICS
,I
,I
-1
.I
,I
-I
,I
,I
,I
,l
I
CITY OF RANCHO CU, JNGA
LIST OF WARRANTS
FOR PERIOD: 12-09-98
,!
RUN DATE: 12/0~/~8 PAGE: 3
VENDOR NId'IE ITEM DESCRIPTION WARP NO WARP. AMT.
1258 ELLIS,
5137 EIqPIRE IIOB!LE HOHE SERVICE
5137 EMPIRE HOBILE HOHE ~ERVICE
229 EWI~ IRRIO~TI~
~t7 FASTE~ C~Y
36~12 FI~ER HILLS, l~.
36411 F~T~E
1082 FR~LIN C~EY CO.
744 F~ELECT
49~0 Q~E RE~E~CH, I~.
335& Q~CIA, VIVI~
335~ G~CIA, VIVI~
1254 GENER~ BINDI~ C~P~ATI~
3~14 QL~E, S~DY
124~ G~VES
137
6029
31075
6044
31079
462
4928
48~2
103
2927
~BB2
310bb
3107b
38S~
4710
1~41
31000
4822
1218
4764
310S2
31070
310b~
OTE C~d_ I FORNIA
OTE DIRECT~IES .~M. ES CORPORATION
OTR TR/d~PORTATION CORPORATION
H · R BL~K TAX ~V[CES, INC.
~PY ELVES DEC~ATI~
~V~ ~T C~ RE~T~T
~5-CUTLER STEEL
~L;D~Y R~K CO.
~YT L~ CO., B.
HY~O-~E PRO~TB,
I C'H A RETIRE~ ~T-4~7
[.C. BO. ·
[C~ RETIRE~NT TROT' 40~
[NDEPE~ENT ~DER OF F~ESTER8
[NDEPE~ENT P~B~D C~ERT[~
i~D L~R
I~D T~ ~iL H[XEB
I~D V~LEY DA~LY B~LETIN
J~N DIV[81~ ~ TEXTR~, iNC.
K A R. C~TR~TI~, [~.
K~ATSU, ROBERT
KELLY, KRIETY
K~I I~9E l~.
LAB~AT~Y C~P. OF ~RICA
LANOER, CAHER~
LEAOUE OF C~IF~N~A CITIES
LEAOUE OF C~[F~N[A CITIES
LEG~ DEFENSE F~D
CHECK#
REIHBURSEHENT
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PROFESSION/d- SERVICES
IRRIOATION SUPPLIES
HAINTEN/~qCE SUPPLIES
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND
RECREATION REFUND
DUES /~D SUBSCRIPTION
OFFICE ~PLIES
DEFERRED C~
~ILEAGE REIHB~SE~NT
HILE~QE
~INTE~E ~UPPLIE~
RECREATI~ REF~D
LEQI~ATIVE SERVICES
B~INESS LICENSE REFU~
~T~Y TELEP~E BILLINQ~
B~!~SS L!CE~E REFUND
~ZNTE~E ~PL;EB
B~I~SS LICENSE
B~IESS LiCE~E REFUND
B~I~SS LICE~E
E~IP~NT ~INTE~CE
RECREATI~
~!NTE~E B~PLIES
~ILEAQE REIHB~BE~ENT
~INT~E $~PLIEB
L~E ~NTE~E 8~PLIES
DEFERRED
HE~ER~IP FEE6
01
RECRE~TI~
B~INESB LICENSE
V~IC~E ~[NTE~NCE
~[NTE~E 8~P~[E6
~[NT
B~[NESS LICENSE
REi~S~ENT
RECREATI~
PRQFESB[~ BERV[CEB
~[NTE~E
RECREAT[~
BUSiNES6 LICENSE
RECREATION
RECREAT[~
ANNUAL
~U~ DUES
RECREAT[~ REFUND
OVERLAP
134420 34. 61
134421 4, ~99. O0
134422 4, ~00. O0
134423 347.
134424 194. O0
13442~ 7. 49
t 34426 10. O0
134427 29. 20
~ 34428 99&. 1
1344~ ~, 1 ~0. O0
1344~ 1 ~4. 77
1~43~ ~. 44
134432 37. 41
~ 34433 90. B&
~ 34434 ~ O. O0
~3443~ 2, 3~. O0
1~436 6.21
~344~ 4, ~94.
1~4~ 46 O1
1 ~4440 ~, 070. O0
~3444~ 10. ~
1~444 20, 61
13444~ 146.
134446 3, 064..~7
t 34447 87~ 4
~ ~448 4~. 08
134449 BIB
~4~ 710, ~
t 34451 195. ~
l~4~R 6, 944. 7t
~344~3 2~. ~
1344~4 69. 47
1344~5 376.
1344~6 B6~ 20
1344~7 ~, 929. 3~
1344~B 1~. 41
1344b0 22. 49
1344~1 75. O0
134462 7,080. ~
134463 323. 4
~ 34464 3~4. 71
1~46~ 16. 21
134466 104, O0
134467 2~, O0
134469 10. ~
134470 203. 70
#
C|IY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA'
LIST OF WARRANT8
FOR PERIOD: 12-09-98 (98/99)
RUN DATE: 12/09198 PAGE: 4
VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION MARR NO HARR. AMT.
979 LENIB HOMES REFUND OF DEVELOPMENT FEES
31081 LINQLE BRO~. COFFEE, INC. BUSINESS LICENSE
31077 LOCKHAN & ASI~OCIATE~ BUSINE~ LICENSE
1062 M C I TELEC01'!HUH~CAT~N8 TELEPHONE SERVICES
549 MARIPOSAHO~TICUL~ ENT. INC. LANI~CAPE HAINTENANCE
4763 I~RKS CABLEVI810N ADVERTISINO
31073 MAROUARDT, BHERYL RECREATION
4727 MAR~IALL PLUMDIN~ REI~B. PROQRAM
537~ II~d~TER BUILDIN~ ~PEG[~M.T[ES I~INTEN~d~CE SUPPLIES
~283 MAYER, COBLE & P~ PROFESSIONAL SERVICE
31072 MAYNARD, REBECCA RECREATION
~587 METROLINK RECREATION
~02 MEYER, PAT REIHBURSEMENT FOR SUPPLIES
602 ~EYER, PAT REIHBURSEMENT FOR SUPPLIES
2198 MICHAELS STORES INC. 13019 RECREATION SUPPLIES
5832 ~IDMEST TAPE LIBRARY SUPPLIES
31083 NISSION LANDSCAPE SERVICES, INC. BUSINESS LICENSE
3860 MOBILE MINI, INC. STOR~E SUPPLIES
310~7 MOLDER0 HELINI~ RECREATION
~047 M~I I!~INQ RECREATION REFUND
3IO~S MUNDY, LINDA RECREATION
2248 NAPA AUTO PARTS
6046 NATIONAL CINEIIAN~THORK
31071 NEV&qEZ, NORI'MI
4281 NIC~SI0, TRIF~ A.
604~ ~T~RN HY~ICB
~02~ NTIS
523 OFFICE DEPOT
31084 OFFICE FURNITURE U~I~, INC.
5403 OFFICE MAX
4327 ORANQE ~ORTINO
1824 ORIENTAL TRADIN~
23~ OHEN ELECTRZC
1441 PACIFIC BELL
33~ PACIFIC E~UIPT · ~RRI~ATI~, I~.
~343 PACIFIC PL~BI~ ~E~I~TIE5
3108~
1823 PA~ENET
3106~ P~KER, KELLY
~409 P~TS~STER, 1~.
487 PATT~ S~ES C~P.
31074 PERDEM, D.L. EIE F~ E~T. JL PERDEH
&002 PERERA. NICHEELE
3107~ PETCO ANI~k S~PLIEB, INC ~ ~00
59~3 PETERS~'S
2~5 P~ DI~TRIBUTI~
758 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTI~, INC.
2533 PRENTICE H~L
3ZBb PRI~IP~ ~TU~
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
RECREATION REFUND
RECREATION
INSTRUCTOR-C~ER, T
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND
RECREATION REFUND
OFFICE SUPPLIES
BU~INSSS LICENSE
OFFICE SUPPLIES
72 DOZEN SOFTBALLS
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
MAINTENANCE ~PLIES
~NTE~E ~PL[ES
~[NTE~E B~PL[E5
~INTE~E B~PLiE8
B~i~9 LICENSE
P~[~ SERVICE
RECREAT[~
~INTE~E ~UPPL~ES
~iNTE~E ~UPPLIES
RELEASE OF DEPOST
RECREATION REFUND
BUSINESS LICENSE
LIBRARY SUPPLIES
VEHICLE ~INTEN~CE & SUPPLIE~
MRINT/RECREAT]ON SUPPL]E~
DFF]CE S~PL]ES
MEDICAL/DISABILITY INSTANCE
** CHECK# OVERLAP
# 134471 2,2~b. 00
134472 6.04
134473 46.00
# 134474 1,39b. 72
# 13447~ 11,688.94
134476 37.73
134477 29.00
# 134478 844~79
134479 1,801.00
1344~0 1,250.00
134481 40.00
134482 4,900,00
134483 ~0.00
134484 40.00
134485 74.8~
# 134486 1,120.00
134487 100.00
# 134488 261.84
134489 200.00
# 134490 6,401,58
134491 200.00
134492 - 134492
# 134493 417.75
134494 3,481.00
13449~ 104.00
134496 20888
# 134497 l~.'l~
134496 120.00
134499 - 134499
# 134~00 10788.7~
134~01 100.00
134~0~ 11.28
134~03 379.93
134~04 334.29
# 134~0~ 1,869.03
134006 ~7.01
# 134507 70900.38
# 134~08 4,934.9~
134'509 22.50
# 134~10 1,043,76
134~12 137. 14
134~13 149.72
134514 1,00000
# 134513 116.42
134~16 203. 77
134317 19.33
# 134318 9,293.87
# 134~19
134520 30.14
134321 ~9,00~.62
't
'1
'3
'1
I I ¥ I}1 ltANCIIL] C[ JNQA
[ Ifil {}[ WARHANIB
FOR PERIOD t 2-09-98 (91a/99)
RUN DATE: 12/09/98 PAGE:
VENDOR NA~E ]TE~ DESCRIPTION ~ARR NO H~RR.
CHECK# OVERLAP
5S3 PROTECTION SERVICE INDUSTRIES PROTECT]ON SERVICES-LIONS CNTR # 134~22 91.00
65 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL BlIPPLY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 134523 ~66, 11
4335 PUBLIC AGENCY RISK ~H~RINQ AUTH CA. 2NO QUARTER PREMIUM DEPOSIT 134~4 116,601.2~
4799 DUALITY ~}L41~CKS OF CAL~F~NIAr VEHICLE SUPPLIES # 134525 451.74
3663 R & T SPECIALTY, INC. D. AR. E. SUPPLIES # 134526 ~45.86
2705 R.H.F. , INC. VEHICLE PLAINT SERVICE&SUPPLIES 1345~7 45.00
959 RADIO SH~CK ACCOUNT8 RECEIVABLE BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 134~28 396.~6
264 RALPHS OROCERY COIIPANY RECREATION SUPPLIES 134529 ~3. 51
11172 RAHONA MARKET BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS 134530 30.00
11173 RANCHO CUCAMONGA EXPLORER POST #539 REIMS RECHARTER FEES 134531 167.00
11174 R~NCHO V/M. LEY VOU, EY B~q4.L CLUB SUNNINESS LICEN=JE REFUNDS 134932 37.84
11171 RBF ASSOCIATES SIGN DEPOSIT REFUND # 134533 1,000.00
6049 REHODELING STORE, THE BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 134~34 117.67
1117~ RENAISSANCE MADISON SEMINAR LODGING FEES 134~3~ 23200
5618 RICHARDS, HATSON, & GERSHON LEGAL SERVICES # 134~36 6,801.82
276 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT PRINTS 134537 117.08
3314 ROBINSON FERTILIZER LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES # 134~36
626 ROBLES, RAUL P., 8R. TIRE REPAIR 134939 47.
~924 ROQ~d~I BUILDIN~ SERVICES JANITORIAL SERVICE 134540
535~ ROLES, MEL SUPPLIES 134541 ~. O0
11176 ROYAL PANDA BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS 134542 10. 62
261 Sad~l BERNARDINO COUNTY PRINTINO & HAIL ~ERVICES 134943 35.10
300 SAN BERN~qDINO COUNTY REIHB PARK1NQ CITATIONS 134544 1o30000
~704 S~N DIEGO LEATHER ~4CKET FACTORY POLICE SUPPLIES 13454~ 254. 77
132 $~kN DIEGO ROT~qY BRIX)I'I CO, INC I'~]NT SUPPLIES # 134546 9~.8. 98
11177 SCHOOL NISE PRESS LIBRARY SUPPLIES 134547 18.63
5060 SCORE COHHUNITY SERVICES SUPPLIES 134~4B
11178 SELO~ CREATIVE FINISHES BLESINESS LICENSE REFUNDS 134~49 4t.'70
2507 SiEBE ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS SERVICE/SUPPLIES # 134550 ~5,314.
351 SIGN Ed4OP, THE MAINT SUPPLIES 134551 BS. 20
4~13 SIHON & SCHI. PSTER LIBRARY SUPPLIES
3276 SINCLAIR PAINT MAINTEN~M~ICE 5UPPLIES 1345~3 62S. 02
692 SIR SPEEDY " FAXES 1345~4 69.80
~327 SNART & FINAL DAY CA/I~ SUPPLIES 134~5 33.9~
36 SMIDERLE, BE& PETTY CASH - CQI'B'IUNIT¥ SVC8 # 134~56 134.31
319 SO CALIF GAS CO. HONTHLY GAS BILLS 134557 119.06
6010 SOUrCEBOOKS. INC. RECREATION REFUND 134~ ~7. 64
1432 60UTHERN CALIFORNIA EDIBON MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLS # 134~6 ~0,568.49
532 8P~BNQL. O, ~ CERT INSTRUCTOR 1345A7 92.80
5722 SPECTRA COMPANY LABOR ~ SUPPLIES 1345b8 400. O0
902 STATE OF CA, DEPARTHENT OF TRANS TRAFFIC SIQ~I~L MAINTENANCE 134~9 4,054.93
3616 SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUHENTB SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL 134~70 ~7. ~0
2344 TARGET YOUTH PRO~R~dq & DAY CAMP BUPPL # 134~71 46.76
tits5 T]HE SUBSCRiPT[ON 134~72 34.97
1919 TOII~a~K SPORTS INC. rtAINTEN~NCE SUPPLIES 134573 32. 33
1974 TRAFFIC SPECIALTIES TRAFFIC BUPPLIES 134~74 124. 13
5238 TRANS~dIERICAN ~OIL LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES 134575 1,069. 56
4873 TROPHY CENTER OF ALTA LOf'l~ RECREATION SUPPLIES 134~76 t,31B. B6
IriS6 TT14475 PARTNLRB LTD OVERPHT APPLICATION FEE 134~77
2737 U.C. REGENTS POCKET GUIDE 13457B 432.00
.l
'1
:1
.I
.I
'1
.I
I
I
,I
I
,I
,I
I
.I
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA'
LIST OF WARRANTS
FOR PERIOD: I~-O~-gS
RUN DATE: 1~/09/~8
VENDOR N~E iTEN DESCRiPTiON ~A,RR NO
ee CHECK# OVERLAP
4558 U.S. OU~RD8 ,0., iNC. SECURITY QU~RD SERV]CE # 134~79 1, ~00.
3844 U.S. RENT~d.-S RENT/M- 134~0
lit80 U!f~NSK¥o LAU;,EN RECREATI~ REFUND~ 134~1 37.50
29~8 ~6 ~E ~ A6~IATI~ ~ 6ERVICEB e t~2 t,97~. ~0
3437 ~IF[RST ~;F~N ~V~CE ~;F~H SERVICES ~ 134~3 590. 10
4206 ~i~E CREAT[~ 1ST AiD KiTS ~4
tttS~ Vi~Y~D C~[ST[~ FFkk~IliP RECREAT[~ REFUNDS · t34~5 723.
2t3 ~XiE, KLEE~[~ C~P ~[NT S~PL[ES e 134~
4577 HELLS F~ ~D ~V[CEB SEC~!TY QU~D SERVICES e ~34~7 3, 427. 44
552& ~EBT QR~ PUBL~SH;~ 134~ 32. 33
titS2 NESTEC RESIDENT~ BEC~ITY, INC B~INEBB LICENSE REF~DB 134~9 14~. 17
lit83 NEBTERN IN~TRI~ ~T, I~ BUSI~SS LICE~E REF~D5 134~90 23. O0
tt184 HIRTZ, KAY RECREATI~ REFUNDS ~ ~34591 ~7.~
illSt ~ACK, ~YCE EXPENSE REIHB~SEHENT 134592
~09 XEROX C~P~ATI~ C~Y ~CHI~ SUPPLIES/SERVICE e 134~93 1,278. 7t
TOTAL
'1
I
J
I
-I
,I
I
I
I
I
i
!
]
'--l'f
DROPPING PARTNER
YES NO /
APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOL BEVERAGE LICENSE(S)
TO:
Department of Alcoholic
3737 Main St., Suite 900
Riverside, CA 92501
(909) 782-4400
Beverage Control
File 'Number...2 ..........346388
Receipt Number ......... 713104
Geographical Code ........ 3615
Col~es Mailed Date 9/10/98
Issued Date
DISTRICT SERVING LOCATION:
Name of Business:
Location of Business:
Number and Street
City, State Zip Code
County
Is premise inside city limits?
If premise licensed:
Type of license
Transferor's names/license:
RIVRR511)F,
ARROW DELl
10970 ARROW RTE I01
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
SAN BERNARDINO
YES
Licen~e TYPe
CA 91730
JEONG ALICE PHIL OK 234063
Transaction Tv~e ~me Tvme Master DuD Dat~ Fea
1. 41 ON-SALE BEER AND W P~i~SON TO P~I~SON T~ANS NA YES 0 SRP 08,1998 $150.00 :
2. 41 ON-SALE BRER AND W ANNUAL F~ NA YES 0 S~P 08,1998 $205.00
TOTAL $355. O0
Have you ever been -~-~ F~ave you ever violated any provisions of ~h¢ Alcoholic Beverag~ Consol
convicted of a felony? N O ~ct, or re~lafions of ~e D~ment pe~ining to the fAct? N O
Explain any "~ ~r-m-~* above ques~oas on an aR~nt which sh~l be deemed p~ this applicator.
Applicant agrees (a) ~at any m~ager employed in on-s~l~ licensed p~mise will have all the qualifications of a
licensee, ~d (b) ~at he will not viola~ or can~ or ~t to be violated any of ~e provisions of the Alcoholic
Beverage Conuol Act.
STATE OF CAL~O~ Coun~ of S~ BE~A~INO Da~ SEP 09,1998
Under p~nM~ of ~Ou~, e~h ~n wh~e si~a~ ~ b, ~fim ~ sa~: (1) He is ~ tpplic~ or one of ~e ~li~m, ~ n executive
officer of ~e a~!ic~t c~fio~ nmd in ~ f~g~g *~ieifi~ dMy au~d m ~ ~s a~licafion on iu b~f; (2) ~ h~ ~ read ~e
forgoing ~d ~ows ~ ~mm'~ ~ ~ ~h of ~ ~ ~ ~n m~ ~ true; (3) ~tt no ~on o~ ~ ~ applic~t or
applic~a h~ ~y di~ or in~ i~ tn ~ ~fi~t or n~li~t's bu~nm to ~ conducted u~er the lice~e(s) for w~ ~ a~cafion is
made; (4) ~at ~ ~sfer a~ or ~ ~fer is n~ m~ to sa~ the pn~ent of a Io~ or to ~lfill ~ ag~ement ended into mor~
~ ninety (~) days pm~g ~ day on w~h ~ ~fer ~fi~ is fiHM m~ ~ Dep~ent or to gmn or esmbli~ a p~fe~n~ to or for ~y
creditor or u~fer~ or to ~ or injure my ~ of u~foroc (5) ~m &e tryfor applicauon may be wi~&awn by eider ~e applic~t or
~e licence wi~ no ~suldng li~ili~ to ~ ~nc
Applicant Name(s)
WOO CHRISTINE' 'I~'
ABC 231 Attached; ABC 227 to follow
3~0 Vilshire Blvd,
Los Angeles, CA 90010
Applicant Signature(s)
/
ABC 211 (4/98)
//
Arrow Dell
10970 Arrow Route
Application: Type 41, Beer & V~ne
'I Applicant: Woo, Brian a.
Address: 10970 Arrow Route 101
Description: Annual renewal/Transfer ownership
of beer and wine license
Site and Surrounding ,Zoning
Site: Industhai Park, Subarea 7,
in the industrial Area Specific Plan
North: Industhai Park, Subarea 7,
in the Industrial Area Specific Plan
South: industhai Park, Subarea 8,
~ in the Industrial Area Specific Plan
East: Industrial Park, Subarea 8,
""~ in the Industrial Area Specific Plan
' West: Industrial Park, Subarea 7,
In the Industrial Area Specific Plan
:ense
AI~I~UW
0.2
ARROW
0
0.2
IVlles
,/parcels
Street Centlines
N
DROPPING PART~R
YES NO~A~
APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOL BEVERAGE LICENSE(S)
TO:
Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control
3737 Main St., Suite 900
Riverside, CA 92501
(909) 782-4400
File' Number .............. 346791
Receipt Number .... ~ .... 1203727
Geographical Code ........ 3615
Copies Mailed Date 9-18-98
Isshed Date
ROD'S TEXACO
FOOTHILL BLVD
RANCHO CUCAMONOA CA
BERNARDINO
19425 CHEYENNE W~LLS
WALNUT CA 917 8 9
DISTRICT SERVING LOCATION:
Name of Business:
Location of Business:
Number and Street
City, State Zip Code
County
Is premise inside city limits?
Mailing Address:
(If different from
premise address)
If premise licensed:
Type of license
91730
RECEIVED
OCT 2 0 1998
City ot Ranct~o Cucamonga
Planning Division
Transferor's names/license: OALVIS ELIZABETH 150322
License Type Transaction TVDe Fee Tv~e Master Du~ Date Fee
1. 20 OFF-SALE BEER AND PERSON TO PERSON TRANS NA YES 0 SEP i8,1998 $50.00 :
2. 20 OFF-SALE BEER AND ANNUAL FEE NA YES 0 SEP 18,1998 $34.00 :
3. 20 OFF-SALE BEER AND STATE FINGERPRINTS NA NO 2 SEP 18,1998 $78.00
Applicant Name (s)
HUSSAIN A~IJUAD ABOOD
ATTACEHED: 231
Recorded Notice to Follow:
........... TOTAL $162.00
Have you ever been Have you ever violated any provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control
convicted of a felony? N 0 Act, or regulations of the Department pertaining to the Act? NO
Explain any "Yes" answer to the above questions on an attachment which shall be deemed Dar~ of this
applicacion
Applicant agrees (a) that any manager employed in on-sale licensed premise will have all the qualifications
of a licenses, and (b) that he .... ~ ~=o= violate or cause or permit to be violated any of the provisions of
the Alcoholic Beverage Contx,:£ Act.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA Co,lnty of SAN BERNARDINO Date Sw-P 18,1998
Under penalty of perjury, each Derson who~e signature aDDlers below, certifies and says: (1) He is an applicant, or one o~ the
applicants, or an executive officer of =he a~licanc corporation, named in che foregoing application, duly authorized to make this
appl~catlon on its behalf; {2) that he has res4 the foregoing and knows :he contents thereof and ~hac each of the above statements
chere~n made are true; {3) that no Derson o~her =ha~ the applicant or a~Dlicants has an~ direct or indirect interesc in the applicant
or applicant's business =o be ¢~cte(~ under the license(sl for w~ich this a$~lication is made; (4) that che transfer application or
proposed transfer is noc made Eo satisfy the payment of a loan or to fulfill an agreement entered into more than n[necy (90) days
preceding the day on which the Erans~er application is filled wich the DeDercmenc or to.gain or establish a preference to or ~or any
creditor or ~ransferor or to defraud or injure any creditor of transferor; (5) that the transfer application may be withdrawn by
either the applicant or the licenses with no resul=in~ liability to the Department.
Applicant Signatu.r.e (s)
PALOMARES ESCROW INC.
2335 W. Foothill Blvd.,
Upland, CA 91786
Escrow No. 7604-R
Ste 17
ABC 211
/Z
Rod's Texaco
8166 Foothill Blvd.
0.05 0
Appllcntlon: Type 20, Beer & Wine
Applicant: Hussain, Alifuad Abood
Address: 8166 Foothill Bird
Description:Annual renewal/Transfer ownership
of beer and wine license
Site and Surroundlnp Zonirl;I
Si~' Specialty Commercial/Foothill Specific Plan
Low Residential (2-4 du/ac)
___ Sout'~: Specialty Commercial
-~n.., c.~.~. ~-~'"~ East: Specialty Commercial
~=~,,,. .... ~----~--~'"~ West: Specialty Commercial
~. ~ /~ ! ! parcels
~ ~...~~... /~/S~reet Centlines
N
0.05 0.1 Mles
I ' S
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
January 6, 1999
TO:.
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM:
BY:
Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director
Paula Pachon, Management Analyst II ~ 3'"
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL OF REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF EPICENTER RENTAL
FEES FOR THE SCHOOl, BUS ROAI~EO TO BE HELD ON APRIL 16 & 17,
!999
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached request from the California
Association of School Transportation Officials (CASTO) to conduct a School Bus Roadeo on April
17, 1999 (set up date is April 16, 1999) at the Epicenter Expanded Parking Lot. CASTO is
requesting that the City Council waive the base rental fee of $3,000. CASTO would pay direct costs
for maintenance services and would provide comprehensive public liability insurance coverage as
required for the event.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
CASTO, Chapter I is a non-profit organization that has used the Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter
Expanded Parking Lot for the past two years to conduct its local RoMeo in preparation for the State
Championship Roadeo sponsored by the State Department of Education. This event normally occurs
in May each year. CASTO consists of school transportation directors, mechanics, driver instructors
and school bus drivers from the San Bernardino and Riverside Counties.
As the Council may recall, the purpose of the local Roadeo is to provide participants with an
oppommity to practice their school bus driving and maneuvering skills. There normally are between
75-80 school bus drivers who participate in the Roadeo. It is anticipated there would be a minimal
amount of facility maintenance required for this event. The Roadeo will be a morning to mid-
afiemoon event ending at approximately 3:00 p.m.. Staff recommends approval of this request based
upon CASTO's affiliation with the State Department of Education, its attention to the public safety
requirements for school bus drivers and the public service it provides members of our community.
Resr~e.ctfu~ly submitted,
Kev~~Mc~rdle
Community Services Director
November 2, I998
Ms. Paula Pachon
Community Services Department
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 9 ! 729
Dear Paula,
Once again our chapter is in full swing for the 1998-1999 school year. As
we prepare our calendar for the events of this year, we are once again requesting the
use of the extended parking lot at the Epicenter Stadium.
This year our annual CASTO, Chapter I School Bus Safety Roadeo will be
held on the 17~' of April, 1999. As we have in the past, if given permission from the
city, our crew will occupy the parking lot in the late afternoon of the 16"'. The
purpose of the early occupation is to measure and determine where each event will
take place. In addition, the lead person will stay the mght in a fully self-contained
unit. The rest ofthe volunteer crew will arrive at approximately 6:00a. m. on the 17'~
to continue setting up the course. The participant school buses and drivers will begin
to arrive at around 7:30n. m. All participants and crew members should be vncated
by 3:00p. m. following the present, t/on of awards.
As in the past, we will acquire two additional portnble toilet units from a
private company. We usually have these units delivered sometime during the
afternoon the day before the event. They will be collected on Monday, April 19'~,
sometime in the morning
We use ropes to mark some events. The ropes are secured with nails. At the
conclusion oftbe Roadoo, the ~ holes will be filled with black silicone, so as to
leave no visible markings.
As CASTO is a non-profit organization, we once again request that the City
of Rancho Cucamonga waive the usual use fee required for the extended parking lot.
Cordially,
Willa Steiner
Treasurer
CASTO, Chapter I
(17ITY OF [L~XNCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
January 6, 1998
Mayor and Members of the City Council,
Jack Lam, AiCP, City Manager
Diane Young, Records Coordinator
Destruction of City Records
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached Resolution authorizing the
destruction of City Records pursuant to the City's Records Retention Schedule.
BACKGROUND/ANAl ,YglS
This request for records destruction comes from the City Manager's Office, the office of record
for the cable television reports. The request has been reviewed and approved for destruction by
the Department representative and the City Attorney. The records listed in the attachment to this
report have met their retention requirements as set forth in the City's Records Retention
Schedule.
DMY
(Attachments as noted)
RESOLUTION NO. 99-***
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE
DESTRUCTION OF CITY RECORDS WHICH ARE NO
LONGER REQUIRED AS SET FORTH IN CALIFORNIA
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 34090 AND OTHER
APPLICABLE LEGAL REFERENCES
WHEREAS, it has been determined that certain City records of the City
Manager's Office have been retained in compliance with all applicable Federal, State and
local statutes; and
WHEREAS, said City records have met their useful life and are no longer
required for public or private purposes:
WHEREAS, destruction of said records is necessary to conserve storage
space, increase staff productivity, and maintain conformance with the City's Records
Management Policy; and
WHEREAS, said records as listed in Exhibit "A" attached hereto have been
approved for destruction by the City Attorney;
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
does hereby resolve as follows:
R!=C--T!C~N 1: That approval and authorization is hereby given to destroy
those records described as Exhibit "A" attached hereto and
made a part hereof.
Resolution No. 99-***
Page 2
S!=CTION :~: That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this
resolution, and thenceforth and thereafter the same shall be in
full force and effect.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 6th day of January, 1999
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAINED:
ATTEST:
William J. Alexander, Mayor
Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk
I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was. duly passed, approved and
adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia, at a regular
meeting of said City Council held on the 6th day of January, 1999.
Executed this 7th day of January, 1999, at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Approval and Authorization
To Destroy Paper Records and/or Documents
I have inspected the following re, cords/documents and recommend/request that they be destroyed.
These records have not been stored in the City's Records Center and are not listed in the City's
Automated Records Management System (ARMS); therefore, destruction is requested outside
the scope of the annual ARMS generated destruction process.
Description of Records/Documents (Include
Record Title Code from Records Retention
Schedule when applicable)
Beginning and Ending (Inclusive) Dates of
Records / Documents (Mo/Yr)
//D~partment Approval
/Council Approval Date (if r~luired)
City Attorney Approval (if required)
Destroyed by:
Date
Signature Date
R.M. Revised 11/98
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
January 6, 1999
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Jerry A. Dyer, Associate Engineer
APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION PROVIDING THE CITY ENGINEER WITH
AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE ALL RIGHT-OF-WAY CERTIFICATIONS
REQUIRED FOR FEDERALLY FUNDED PROJECTS OR PROJECTS WITHIN
STATE RIGHT-OF-WAY
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution providing the City Engineer
authority to execute all right-of-way certifications for Federally funded projects or projects within
State right-of-way.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
Capital Improvement Projects which are funded with Federal funds or which encroach within the
State right-of-way require right-of-way certification prior to releasing funds for the project or
issuance of an encroachment permit. CalTrans has suggested that the City Engineer obtain
authorization from the City Council to execute fight-of-way certifications in order to streamline
project processing. The City is currently working on two projects requiring such certifications -
Carnelian Street Realignmere south of Base Line Road and the medians within Foothill Boulevard
between Vineyard Avenue and Haven Avenue.
Respectfully submitted,
William J 02qeil
City Engineer
WJO:JAD
Attachmeres
RESOLUTION NO. ~-- ~)0 ~-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, PROVIDING THE CITY ENGINEER
WITH AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE ALL RIGHT-OF-WAY
CERTIFICATIONS
WHEREAS, Capital Improvement Projects which are funded with Federal funds or which
encroach within the State Right-of-Way require Right-of-Way Certification prior to releasing funds
for the project or issuance of an Encroachment Permit; and
WHEREAS, an authorization will allow the City Engineer to execute the Certification
without having to obtain authorization from the City Council each time; and
WHEREAS, the State requires Right-of-Way Certification prior to using funds for the project
or approving an Encroachment Permit or releasing Federal funds.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, does hereby authorize the City Engineer to execute
all Right-of-Way Certification forms.
C?TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
January 6, 1999
TO:
FROM:
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY
Shelley Maddox, Engineering Aide
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 FOR D.R. 98-04, LOCATED ON
THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND ARCHIBALD
AVENUE, SUBMiTTED BY RETAI!. HOLDINGS. L.L.C.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution ordering the annexation to
Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. l and 6 for
D.R. 98-04.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
D.R. 98-04, located on the northeast comer of Base Line Road and Archibald Avenue, is required
to fulfill certain conditions of approval along with the normal processing. As part of those
conditions, the Developer is required to have the project annexed into the appropriate lighting and
landscape maintenance districts.
The Consent and Waiver to Annexation form has been received from the Developer and is on file
in the City Clerk's office. Attached is the Resolution for adoption by the City Council to complete
the proposed annexation.
Respectfully Submitted,
William J. O'Neil
City Ehglaeec
WJO:SM:dlw
Attachments
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
RNG~RRING DIVISION
N
RESOLUTION NO. 9 q- 0 L'9,=~
A KESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE
ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 FOR DR. 98-04
(APN: 1076-191-09)
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously
formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act
of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said
special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No.3 B, Street
Lighting Maintenance District No. I and Street Lighting Maintenance District No.6 (hereinafter
referred to as the "Maintenance District"); and
WHEREAS, the provisioas ofArticle 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act
of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and
WHEI~AS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the
property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this referenced to the
Maintenance District; and
WHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the
Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation
without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineees "Report".
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
HEREBY tIESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1' That the above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the property as
shown in Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto to the
Maintenance District.
SECTION 3' That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including the levy of
all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder.
EXHIBIT "A"
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MA/NTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
NORTH
DR 98-04
STREET LIGHTS:
Dist~ 5800L
S1 --
S6 --
EXHIBIT "B"
WORK PROGRAM
PROJECT: D.1L 98-04
(APN: 1076-191-09)
NUMBER OF LAMPS
9500L,, 16.000L 22.000L
27.500L
LANDSCAPING:
Community
Equestrian
Trail
Dist, D.G.S.F.
L3B --
Tuff
S.F.
Non-Turf
S.F.
Trees
Ea.
ASSESSMENT UNITS:
DU or
Parcel Acres
.91
Assessment Units
By District
S1 S6 L3B
1.8 .91 .91
Annexation Date: 1/6/99
Form Date 11/16/94
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
January 6, 1999
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager,
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Betty A. Miller, Associate Engineer
APPROVAL OF' IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURiTY FOR TRACT 14380, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF WILSON
AVENUE WESTOF ETIWANDA AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY MASTERCRAFT
HOMES AND GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION, AND
RELEASE OF PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY ACCEPTED BY CITY COUNCIL ON
NOVEMBER 6, 199t, FROM WATT INLAND EMPIRE, INC.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject agreement
arid security and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Tract 14380, located on north side of Wilson Avenue west of Etiwanda Avenue, in the Low
Residential Development District, was approved by the City Council on November 6, 1991. The
property has been acquired by General Electric Capital Corporation and is being sold in phases to
a new developer, Mastercraft Homes. Together they are submitting a new agreement and security
to guarantee the construction of the public improvements in the following amounts:
Faithful Performance
Labor and Material
Street Improvements On Site $ 509,000
Storm Drains On Site $ 103,000
Balance of Phase I Landscape $ 275,000
Eftwanda Avenue north of Wilson $ 85,400
Eftwanda Storm Drain north of Wilson $ 89,500
Wilson Ave., Eftwanda North to Cervantes $ 161,600
Wilson Avenue, Eftwanda South to
Eftwanda North $ 38,400
Channel H and Debris Basin $ 566,500
CCWD Access Road over Channel H $ 20,000
Temporary Detention Basin at Line "O" $ 69,500
Removal of Temporary Detention Basin $ 184.700
254,500
51,500
137,500
42,700
44,750
80,800
19,200
283,250
10,000
34,750
92.350
TOTAL: $2,102,600 21,051,300
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
TRACT 14380
January 6, 1999
Page 2
Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office.
Respectively submitted,
Willifivrt J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:BAM:sd
Attachments
I
{ .' ~ !' 1
.... I i.'.:~::> ', ,' .~ f ' q ....
..... ~t:~!:f::I'..:: ............................
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ENGINEERING DIVISION
NOI{TII
ITEM: Tract 14380
TITLE: Vicinity Map
EX!IIBIT' "A"
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY FOR TRACT MAP NUMBER 14380
WHEREAS, Tract Map No. 14380,
Cucamonga, on November 6, 1991; and
was approved by the City Council of Rancho
WHEREAS, an Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security were accepted by the
City Council from Watt Inland Empire, Inc., at that time; and
WHEREAS, General Electric Capital Corporation has since acquired Tract Map No. 14380
and has now agreed to assume all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the
final map by entry into a new Improvement Agreement guaranteed by acceptable Improvement
Security by Mastercraft Homes and General Electric Capital Corporation as developer; and
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security submitted
by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign
said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to
attest; and the City Engineer is hereby authorized to release the previously accepted Improvement
Agreement and Improvement Securities
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
January 6, 1999
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer '.
Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer
APPROVAL OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICE CONTRACT FOR PLAN CHECK
SERVICE WITH AUFBAU CORPORATION
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council review the subject agreement with Aufbau Corporation and
authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the same.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The recent increase in development activity has necessitated using consultants to provide timely and
if requested, expedited plan check reviews. The consultant's services will be covered by the plan
check fees which are collected as part of Engineering's fee structure.
Respectfully Submitted,
William J. O'Neil
'City Engineer
WJO:DJ:dlw
DATE:
TO:
FROM'
BY:
1"~' ()1: R.\XC[I(~ CI' ' \'
STAFF REPORT
Jant, ary 6. 1999
Mayor and Members of lilt: City Council
Jack Lain, AICP. City Manager
William J. O No'I. City Faginter
James T. Harris. Project Managerc.-}'~..
Michael D. Long. Supervising Pufft'lc Works Inspcctor/'"~'O'~
SUBJECT:
APPROPRIATE S26,757.80 FROM THE FUND BALANCE OF FUND 22 TO BE
PLACED INTO ACCOUNT NO. 22-4637-9817, APPROVE THE AWARD AND
AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT FOR THE CONSTRUC'I'ION
TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT THREE INTERSECTIONS, TO
COMPUTER SERVICE COMPANY THE AMOUNTOF $424.468.00 ($385,880.00 PLUS
10%) TO BE FUNDED FROM TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT FEES FROM THE
FOLLOWING ACCOUNT NUMBERS: $125.728.90 FROM 22-4637-9816 (SIGNAL AT
ROCtlESTER & VICTORIA PARK LANE): $166.757.80 FROM 22-4637-9817 (SIGNAL
AT I IIGI-ILAN D AN D CARN ELIAN}: AND $131.081.30 FROM 22-4637-9818 ( SIGNAL.
AT ROCHESTER AND VINTAGE)
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that tile City Council award a,~d at,thorizc for execution the coiltract lbr lilt Construction
off Tragic Signals and Sati:ty Lighting at Three Locations. to the lowest responsive bidder. Computcr Scrvicc
Compa,~y. in tbc amount of $424.468.00 ($385.880.00 plus 10%) to bc ft,ndcd l¥om Transponalion
Development Fecs [¥om tile lbllowing Accotrot Numbers: $125.728.90 from 22-4637-9816 (Sig,lal at
Rochester & Victoria Park Lane): $166.757.80 from 22-4637-9817 (Signal at t lighland and Carnelian): and
$131.081.30 from 22-4637-0818 ( Signal at Rochester and Vi,itage)
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
Per previous Council actio,. bids were solicited, received and opened on December 15. 1008. for tile subject
project. Computer Service Co,~pany is the apparent lowest bidder, with a bid amount of $385,880.00 (sc¢
attached Bid Summary). The Engineer's estimate was $328,000.00. singbas reviewed all bids received and
tbtmd them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements.. Slag has completed the required
backgrotmd investigation and finds nil bidders to meet the requirements of tile bid doer, meats.
Rcspe~ully subtnitte¢l. '
Wil~.L~rf J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:MDL:ts
Attachment
Bid summary
Traffic Signals at 3 locations
Bids opened on Tuesday, December 15, 1998 ~ 2:00 PM
Item Description
1 Traffic Signal at Rochester & Vintage
2 Traffic signal at Rochester & VPL
3 Traffic Signal at Carnelian & Highland
TOTAL SUM OF BID
Item Description
1 Traffic Signal at Rochester & Vintage
2 Traffic signal at Rochester & VPL
3 Traffic Signal at Carnelian & Highland
TOTAL SUM OF BID
Compu[er
Services
Qty Unit Price
'~ LS $114,299.00
t LS $,151,598.00
1 LS $1'19,983.00
$385,880.00
New West
Signal
Qty Unit Price
1 L.S $128,005.00
1 LS $162,074,00
1 LS $128,623,00
$418,702.00
Sierra
Pacific
Price
$124,583.00
$147,960.00
$116,297.00
S388,840.00
Trans Tech
Engineers
Price
$117,000.00
$175,000,00
$130,000,00
$422,000.00
Construction
Price
$126,263,00
$151,050.00
$117,119.00
$394,432.00
OBX Inc.
Price
$132,419.00
$165,375.00
$127,781.00
$425,575.00
J¥
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
January 6, 1999
TO:
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM:
Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director
BY:
Paula Pachon, Management Analyst II
SUBJECT:
REOUEST FOR APPROVAL TO APPROPRIATE FUNDS RECEIVED FROM
A CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF AGING GRANT IN THE AMOUNT OF
$3,000 FOR SENIOR CITIZEN RECREATION SERVICES (FY 1998-1999)
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council appropriate $3,000 for fiscal
year 1998/1999 received from a Califomia Department of Aging Grant with the San Bernardino
County Department of Aging and Adult Services.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The San Bernardino County Department of Aging and Adult
Services is the Area Agency which assists with the allocation of Senior Citizen program grants from
the California Department of Aging. Last year the City submitted a grant application to the County
to provide a comprehensive marketing and promotional program for Senior Citizens. Specific for
that grant was the development of a Senior Center brochure in English and Spanish that described
the services, programs, classes and events that take place at the Center. Staff has recently been
notified that we were approved for an additional $3,000 grant for this current fiscal year. Through
conversations with the County, staff has indicated that these monies would be used for recreation
services for Senior Citizens. Specifically, we will focus on recreation activities which focus on
physical, social, psychological, educational and recreational needs of older persons.
FISCAL IMPACT: The grant award is $3,000.00 for fiscal year 1998/1999. An in-kind match of
$330.00 will be provided by the City in the form of equipment and supplies which will be covered
through the Department's annual 1998-1999 budget.
Respectfully submitted,
Kevin McArdle
Community Services Director
KMA:PP:pp
i: staffrpt: seniorgrant98
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FISCAL YEAR 1998/99 ANNUAL BUDGET SUMMARY
DEPARTMENT: Community Services FUND: 132
DIVISION: Senior Outreach Program Grant COST CENTER: 4532
OBJECT #
PERSONNEL
1300 Part time Salaries
1900 Fringe Benefits
1100 Full Time Salaries
APPHOPRIA I ION DE I AlL
1996/97 Fiscal Year 1997/98
Adopted Adopted Estimated
Budget Budget 6/30/98
1,000
20
0
F~scal Year 1998/99
Dept Manager
Request Rcmd
OPERATIONS
3100 Travel & Meetings
3300 Mileage
3900 Maintenance & Operations
3956 Dues
3960 General Liability
6028 Contract Services
Personnel Total:
1.020
0
0
1,008
20
960
CAPITAl OUTI AY
Operations Total:
1,980
Capit~l Outlay Total:
Department Total:
0
3,000
AGENCY
EXHIBIT A - SCOPE OF SERVICES
AGREEMENT FOR PURCHASE OF SERVICES
DEPARTMENT OF AGING AND ADULT SERVICES
P.O. ~ Z
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PHONE (909) 477-2760
MAILING ADDRESS P.O. BOX 807, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91729
CONTACT PERSON DAVE MOORE
SERVICE SITE RANCHO CUCAMONGA SENIOR CENTER PHONE (909) 477-2780
ADDRESS 9791 ARROW ROUTE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730
CONTACT PERSON DAVE MOORE
HOURS OF OPERATION 8am-10pm M-F
THIS AGREEMENT, is entered into on the 1st day of July, 1998,
by and between the County of San Bernardino acting as the Area Agency on
Aging, hereinafter called the Department of Aging and Adult Services "DAAS"
and CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA '
direct service provider, hereinafter called "Provider."
WHEREAS, the Older Americans Act of 1965, as amended, provides
for assistance to state and local agencies to develop social supportive
services to meet the needs of the elderly; and
WHEREAS, the california Department of Aging (CDA) has allocated
funds to DAAS for the purpose of administering a certain portion of said
funds pursuant to said act; and for the purpose of planning service programs
and activities for the elderly; and
WHEREAS, DAAS desires to use CDA monies"to fund, and the Provider
desires to operate and execute a program, this Agreement is executed to
identify the specific terms and conditions covering the funding, execution
and operation of the program provided by this Agreement.
THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants
contained herein, DAAS and the Provider agree as follows:
ARTICLE I. DEFINITIONS ANDRESOLUTIONS OF LANGUAGE CONFLICTS
A. The term "Agreement' shall mean the coversheets; the Terms
and Conditions; Scope of Work Plan; Budget Display: Budget summary; exhibits;
attachments; addendums; and amendments, unless otherwise provided in this
Article;
B. 'DAAS' means the San Bernardino County Department of Aging
and Adult Services, the designated Area Agency on Aging.
C. "State,' "Department" and "CDA' mean the State and the
California Department of Aging interchangeably.
D. "Provider" means the entity ~o which funds are awarded under
this Agreement Agreement and which is accountable to DAAS for use of these
funds and is responsible for executing its provision and services.
E. In the event of conflict between the provisions set forth
in the Agreement Terms and Conditions and any Project Application or Scope
of Work, Propoosal, or Area Plan, the provisions listed in the Agreement
Terms and Conditions shall prevail.
F. 'Reimbursable
"compensable item."
item' also means "allowable cost" and
G. 'CFR' means Code of Federal Regulations. "CCR' means
California Code of Regulations. 'GC' means Government Code. "W&I" means
Welfare and Institutions Code. 'USC" means United States Code. "OMB" means
Office of Management and Budget.
H. 'CDA PM' refers to the "Title III Program Manual for Ar~a
Agencies on Aging." This manual is based on Federal regulations for Ti'
III published March 31, 1980 (CFR, Chapter 8, Subchapter C, Par 1321.
Pertinent parts of 45 CFR Sub-title A, Part 74, published June 3, 1980,
have also been used. A copy of the manual is available for review at the
Department of Aging and Adult Services, 686 East Mill Street, San Bernardino,
CA 92415-0640 during regular office hours.
I. 'Program Income or grant related income" refers to any income
earned by a Provider during the Agreement period from activities supported
in part or total by Federal funds. It includes, but is not limited to,
income in the form of fees for services performed during the Agreement
period, proceeds from sale of tangible property or real property and from
the sale of equipment and supplies acquired for use, usage or rental fees,
interest and patent or copyright royalties. Contributions/donations made
by older persons are considered program income.
J. 'General Program Income" refers to income received in the
form of contributions/donations made by the elderly for services rendered.
K. 'In-Kind Contributions" are property, equipment, services
(e.g. volunteer services) and supplies benefiting a Title III supported
program or activity contributed by non-federal third parties without charge
to the service provider.
Page 2 of 25
L. -Non-expendable Personal Property" refers to tangible personal
~roperty having a useful life of more than one year and an acquisition cost
of $500 or more per unit.
M. "Elderly" refers to any individual who is 60 years of age
older.
ARTICLE II. TERM OF AGREEMENT
The term of this Agreement will begin on the 1st day of July,
1997 and terminate on the 30th day of June, 1998.
FISCAL AND PROGRAM PROVISIONS
ARTICLE III.
A.
COMPENSATION
1. Maximum Funds Available
The maximum amount of funds available under this Agreement
shall be $ 3,000.00 , and shall be subject to availability of funds
from CDA.
2. Schedule of Payments
Provider may be provided a payment advance equal to 10%
of the Title III funded portion of the total agreement amount under this
Agreement for start-up purposes. Provider shall be compensated with the
remainder of the Title III funds monthly. The monthly disbursement is not
to exceed one-twelfth of the balance of the appropriated funds without
written justification for reimbursement to exceed one-twelfth. The
~-alculation of the monthly disbursement amount will be based on the previous
.onth's expenditures and the cash-on-hand identified in the Expenditure
Report/Request for Reimbursement.
3. Expenditure of Funds
a. Provider shall expend all funds received hereunder
in accordance with this Agreement. .. '~
b. DAAS reserves the right to refuse payment to the
Provider or later disallow costs for any expenditure determined by DAAS
and/or State not to be in compliance with this Agreement, or inappropriate
to such activities, or, for which there is inadequate supporting
documentation presented or, for which prior approval is required but not
granted.
4. Unexpended Funds
a. Provider will return to DAAS, immediately, upon written
demand, any funds provided under this Agreement which are not payable for
goods or services delivered prior to the termination, cancellation, or
expiration of this Agreement, or the dissolution of the entity.
b. Provider must return any unspent funds with submittal
of revised year-end Financial Closeout Report, based on independent audit.
Page 3 of 25
J?
5. Accountability for Funds
Provider shall maintain accounting records to account
for the funds received under the terms and conditions of this Agreement
separate from any other funds administered by the Provider. Provider shall
maintain records in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
B. GENERAL PROGRAM INCOME
1. Provider is encouraged to seek contributions/donations
from seniors participating in the program. The program income goal for
contributions/donations should be 25% or more of the total expenditures
identified in the attached Budget Display.
2. General program income will be used to increase the number
of clients served by a project, to facilitate access to such project, and
to provide supportive services directly related to the project as defined
in the Work Plan. General program income will be used within the program
in which it was earned.
C. MATCHING CONTRIBUTIONS
The Provider will provide in-kind matching contributions of
a minimum of $ 333.00 which is the Title III portion of the Agreement
multiplied by 11.11%. Allowable match shall be in compliance with the
following CDA requirements:
1. Matching in-kind contributions must be for allowable costs
as determined by CDA policy. Allowable costs include, but are not limited
to, rent, utilities, supplies, personnel (volunteers).
2. To qualify as a matching in-kind contribution, indirect
or Provider allocated overhead expenses must be supported by a document
cost allocation plan.
3. Matching in-kind contributions in excess of the minimum
required in one service component may be used to match another service
component within the Older Americans Act. As an example, match exceeding
the m~nimum requirement in a transportation program may be used to ~ffset
an under match in in-home support services.
4. Provider will provide a Budget In-Kind Narrative statement
to DAAS with the submittal of the initial budget identifying the type, rates
applied and, if applicable, source/location of in-kind to be used as match
for the period of the Agreement. The identified in-kind match will be
reported monthly on the monthly expense reports.
a. Services of volunteers shall be valued at rates
consistent with those ordinarily paid for similar work by the Provider.
If the Provider does not have similar work, the rate shall be consistent
with those in the labor market. In either case, a reasonable amount of
employee benefits may be included.
Page 4 of 25
b. All other in-kind contributions shall be valued at ~
current market value. ~
D. AUDIT
1. Providers who expend more than $300,000 of aggregated
~ederal Awards will arrange for an audit to be performed as required by
the Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996, Public Law 98-502 and a copy
submitted to:
Department of Aging and Adult Services
686 East Mill Street
San Bernardino, California 92415-0640
2. If Provider is a public o~'private entity:
a. Nonprofit institution expending more than $300,000
a year in aggregated Federal Awards will have an audit made in accordance
with the provisions of Office Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-133,
Audits of Institutions of Higher Education and other nonprofit institutions.
b. Nonprofit institutions that expend less than $300,000
a year in aggregated Federal Awards are exempt from Federal audit
requirements for that year. Ho'wever, an on-site monitoring visit will be
performed to ensure that Federal awards are used for authorized pruposes
under OMB Circular A-110 or OMB Circular A-128.
c. Any nonprofit institutions who obtain audit reports
and are not required to, will not be reimbursed for audit report expenses.
3. Required audits must be performed in accordance with
jenerally accepted auditing standards (GAAS) and the Statements on Auditing
Standards (SASS) issued and interpreted by the American Institute of
Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) and the Government Auditing Standards
(Yellow Book) issued by the U.S. General Accounting Office.
Further, the audit must include a review of compliance
to datermine wheter statistical data is recorded accurately and reported
properly, to determine whether the program is being administered by the
Provider in compliance with the agreement auditing listing of client case
files, and to determine that the program revenue and expenditures are
properly segregated from other programs being administered by the Contractor.
4. To ensure that OMB Circular A-133 requirements are met,
audit report shall consist of the following parts:
a. A report on the financial statements, a schedule of
federal awards, which must report in-kind match., along with the auditor's
opinion on the financial statements;
b. A report on the entity-wide internal control systems
based on the auditor's understanding of the internal control structure and
the assessment of control risk (made as part of a financial statement audit);
a report on internal controls (accounting and administrative) designed to
provide reasonable assurance of compliance with laws and regulations
applicable to federal assistance or federal awards, including tests of
transactions (including program income and expenditures);
Page 5 of 25
¢/
c. A report on compliance with laws and regulations that
may be material to financial statements; an opinion on compliance with laws
and regulations applicable to each major federal program and a statement
of positive assurance of those items that were tested (including program
income) for compliance and negative assurance for those items not tested
These requirements may be met by the following:
i. A report on compliance with general requirements
applicable to federal programs drawn from the relevant OMB Compliance
Supplement;
ii. An opinion on compliance with specific requirements
applicable to each major program (major program refers to Congregate Meals,
C-l; Home Delivered Meals, C-2; and Supportive Services, B) [the opinion
should specify whether information contained in federal financial reports
is supported by books and records and amounts claimed and used for matching
meet applicable cost principle];
d. A report on fraud, abuse, illegal acts or indications
of such acts, if necessary;
e. A schedule of reportable conditions (including material
weaknesses) for internal control findings and a schedule of findings and
questioned costs for compliance findings (if not included in the internal
control or compliance reports; a management letter; separate communication
of nonmaterial findings relative to federal programs.
5. Audit must also include:
a. Schedule of Service Delivery. This schedule will giy~9
the number of service units provided by the Provider, by program and
month.
6. Provider will select a certified public accountant of
approved auditors published by the County of San Bernardino. The Provider
must receive approval from DAAS prior to hire of the auditor from the
approved auditors published by the County of San Bernardino.
7. Provider will include in its agreement with an independent
auditor a clause permitting access by the County and State to the work papers
of the independent auditor.
8. Provider will notify DAAS of the time and location of
scheduled entrance and exit conferences with independent auditors, so that
appropriate DAA$ and other appropriate County staff may participate.
9. The cost of audits performed pursuant to Public Law 98502
shall be charged to the Provider, in accordance with Public Law 98502 and
OMB Circular A-128 or A-133, as appropriate.
10. All audits shall be performed in accordance with and
address &ll~ issues contained in any OMB Compliance Supplement that applies
to this program.
1i. Audits to be performed shall be financial and program
compliance audits.
Page 6 of 25
12. The auditor of record, hired by the Provider, shall prep,are
and file with the County, a draft copy of the independent audit within 90
days after termination of this Agreement and prior to the exit conference.
Within 120 days after the termination or expiration of this Agreement, the
final independent audit report of related expenditures during the term of
his Agreement, shall also be filed with the County.
13. Provider will assist and comply with audit resolution
requirements as required by DAAS, including submitting to DAAS at the exit
conference, a corrective action plan for any findings or recommendations,
identified in the draft audit.
14. Provider must take appropriate action to correct instances
of noncompliance with federal laws and regulations within six months after
DAAS has received the audit report.
15. The Provider agrees to be subject to the examination and
audit of the county for a period of three (3) years after final payment
under this grant.
E. BUDGET AND BUDGET REVISIONS
1. The Provider will be reimbursed for expenses only as
itemized in the budget approved by DAAS which is attached and hereby
incorporated by reference.
2. The Budget must set forth in detail the reimbursable items,
unit rates, and extended total amounts for each line item. The Provider's
budget shall include, at a minimum, the following items when reimbursable
under this Agreement:
a. Direct and overhead costs.
b. Rental reimbursement items should specify the unit
rate, such as the rate per square foot.
c. If purchase of equipment is a reimbursable item, the
euqipment to be purchased should be specified.
d. Any travel outside the State of California.
3. Budget and budget revisions shall adhere to any other
provisions contained in the CDA Program Manual(s).
4. The Board of Supervisors delegates the authority to the
Director of DAA$ to make budget revisions provided the revisions do not
result in the amount of the contract exeeding the previously Board-approved
amount.
F. SUBCONTRACTING
The Director of DAAS is designated the authority to approve
one or more subcontracts provided the agreement meets the following terms
and conditions:
Page 7 of 25
1. The policies and procedures used in processing and awarding
the subcontracts are (a) organized and structured; (b) reasonable ~nd
equitable; (c) documented and approved by appropriate authorities; (d)
consistent with federal, state, and local law applicable procurement
requirements; (e) uniformly applied; and (f) open for public review an.d
scrutiny.
2. All subcontracts irequire the advance written approval
of the DAAS Director or designee.
3. Provider shall be responsible for the performance of any
subcontractors and shall retain the prime responsibility for all terms and
conditions set forth in this Agreement, including but not limited to, the
responsibility for handling property in ..accordance with Article X and
ensuring the accessibility, availability and retention of records of
subcontractors in accordance with Article X.
4. Funds for this Agreement shall not be obligated in
subcontracts for services beyond the ending date of this Agreement.
5. The Provider shall have no authority to contract for,
or on behalf of, or incur obligations on behalf of the County.
6. Copies of subcontracts, memoranda and/or letters of
understanding shall be on file with the Provider and shall be made available
for review at the request of the County.
7. The Provider shall be responsible to ensure all
subcontractors meet the insurance requirements and for monitoring the
insurance requirements in accordance with Article V, Section C.
8. The Provider shall require all subcontractors to indemni
defend and save harmless the Provider and the County, its officers, agents
and employees from any and all claims and losses accruing to or resulting
from any Providers, subcontractors, materialmen, laborers, and any other
person, firm, or corporation furnishing or supplying work services,
materials, or supplies in connection with any activities performed for which
funds from this Agreement were used and from any and all claims and losses
accruing or resulting to any person, firm, or corporation who may be injured
or damaged by the subcontractor in the performance of this Agreement.
9. The Provider shall ensure that the subcontractor will
complete all reporting and expenditure documents requested by the Department.
These reporting and expenditure documents shall be sent to the Provider
in a timely manner and at intervals as determined by the Department.
10. A copy of the executed subcontract shall be submitted to the
DAAS Director.
ARTICLE IV. MONITORING, ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION
A. The County or any subdivision or appointee thereof and the
State of California or any subdivision or appointee thereof shall have
absolute right to review and audit all records, papers, documents, client
files, corporate minutes and other performed items as reported, and shall
have absolute right to monitor the performance of Provider and subcontractors
in the delivery of services provided under this Agreement.
Page
8 of 25
B. Provider shall permit DAAS to perform periodic program and
fiscal monitoring visits. Authorized DAAS, State and/or Federal
representatives shall also be permitted to monitor, assess and evaluate
the Provider's performance as needed, pursuant to this Agreement. Said
.......... monitoring, assessment and evaluation may include, but is not limited to,
iscal records, audits, inspections of project premises, and interviews
0~ith Providers' employees and agents providing the service under this
Agreement and recipients thereof. Provider will ensure cooperation and
shall attend all meetings mandated by DAAS.
C. Provider will cooperate fully in conducting any auditing,
monitoring, assessment and evaluation process. This includes making any
program and/or administrative staff (fiscal, etc.) available as a part of
the process and filing a corrective action plan within 30 days of
notification of the exception.
D. INSPECTIONS
1. Provider shall make available to DAAS, State or Federal
officials, its records and data with respect to all matters covered by this
Agreement for inspection and audit. Said inspection and audit may be made
at any time, during normal business hours (CDA PM, Part G, Section 93.21
N 8).
ARTICLE V.
INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE
A. Provider agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the
County and its authorized officers, agents, and volunteers from any and
all claims, actions, losses, damages, and/or liability arising from
Provider's acts, errors or omissions, and for any costs or expenses incurred
~y the County on account of any claim therefore, except where such
_ndemnification is prohibited by law.
E. Without in any way affecting the indemnity herein provided,
and in addition thereto, the Provider shall secure and maintain throughout
the Agreement the following types of insurance with limits as shown:
1. Workers' Compensation - A. program of Workers' Compensation
insurance or a state-approved Self-Insurance Program in an amount and form
to meet all applicable requirements of the Labor Code of the State of
California, including Employer's Liability with $250,000 limits, covering
all persons providing services on behalf of the Provider and all risks to
such persons under this Agreement.
2. Comprehensive General and Automobile Liability Insurance
- This coverage to include contractual coverage and automobile liability
coverage for owned, hired and non-owned vehicles. The policy shall have
combined single limits for bodily injury and property damage of not less
than five-hundred thousand dollars ($500,000).
If--applicable, Providers and subcontractors shall comply
with the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) General Order No. 115-E which
requires 'higher levels of insurance for charter-party carriers of passengers
and is based on seating capacity as follows: $1,500,000 if seating capacity
is 8-15; $5,000,000 if seating capacity is over 15; unless otherwise amended
by future regulation.
Page 9 of 25
3. Errors and Omissions Liability Insurance - Combined single
limits of $1,000,000 for bodily injury and property damage, and $3,000,~00
in the aggregate, or.
Professional Liability - Professional Liability Insuran¢..e
with limits of at least $1,000,000 per claim or occurrence.
C. ADDITIONAL NAMED INSURED
All policies, except for the Workers' Compensation, Errors
and Omissions, and Professional Liability policies, shall contain additional
endorsements naming the County and its officers, employees, agents, and
volunteers as additional named insured with respect to liabilities arising
out of the performance of services hereunder..
D. WAIVER OF SUBROGATION RIGHTS
Except for Errors and Omissions and Professional Liability,
Providers shall require the carriers of the above required coverage to waive
all rights of subrogation against the County, its officers, employees,
agents, volunteers, Providers and subcontractors.
E. POLICIES PRIMARY AND NON-CONTRIBUTORY
All policies required above are to be primary and
non-contributory with any insurance or self-insurance programs carried or
administered by the County.
F. PROOF OF COVERAGE
Provider shall immediately furnish certificates of insurar
to DAAS, evidencing the insurance coverage above required prior to t
commencement of performance of services hereunder, which certificates shall
provide that such insurance shall not be terminagted or expire without thirty
(30) days written notice to the department, and Provider shall maintain
such insurance from the time Provider commences performance of services
hereunder until the completion of such services. Within sixty (60) days
of the commencement of this Agreement, the Provider shall furnish certified
copies of the policies and endorsements.
G. INSURANCE i:tEV I EW
1. The above insurance requirements are subject to periodic
review .by the County. The County's Risk Manager is authorized, but not
required, to reduce or waive any of the above insurance requirements whenever
the Risk Manager determines that any of the above insurance is not available,
is unreasonably priced, or is not needed to protect the interest of the
County. In addition, if the Risk Manager determines that heretofore
unreasonably priced or unavailable types of insurance coverage or coverage
limits become reasonably priced or available, the Risk Manager is authorized,
but not required, to-~hange the above insurance requirements to require
additions! tyTes of insurance coverage or higher coverage limits, provided
that any such change is reasonable in light of past claims against the
County, inflation, or any other item reasonably related to the County's
risk.
Page 10 of 25
2. Any such reduction or waiver for the entire term of the
Agreement and any change requiring additional types of insurance coverage
or higher coverage limits must be made by amendment to this Agreement.
Provider agrees to execute any such amendment within thirty (30) days of
~eceipt.
ARTICLE VI.
LAWSUITS
Provider understands and agrees that any/all legal fees associated
with lawsuits against the Provider, the County or State of California cannot
be budgeted as a Provider expense and shall be paid by the Provider.
ARTICLE VII. CONFIDENTIALITY
A. Provider agrees to comply and require its officers, agents,
employees, volunteers to comply with the provisions of Sections 15633.5
and 10850 of the Welfare and Institutions Code. Any violation of the
confidentiality required by this Chapter is a misdemeanor punishable by
not more than 6 months in County jail, by a fine of $500, or by both fine
and punishment.
Respect for a client's right to privacy is of the utmost
importance. Written consent from the client is desirable before releasing
any information about the client to other agencies.
B. Provider will take steps to ensure that no information about,
or obtained from an individual, and in the possession of the Provider, will
be discussed in a form identifiable with the individual, without the
individual's informed consent.
C. All client records are to be maintained in a locked file so
as to safeguard information against theft, loss, destruction, or unauthorized
use.
ARTICLE VIII. CORRECTION OF DEFICIENCIES OR NON-PERFORMANCE
A. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS AND RF2tEDIES
1. If for any reason the Provider's service, including
services to targeted populations, falls 5% under or increases to 25% over
the Agreement level during any calendar quarter, the Provider will submit
to DAAS, within 30 calendar days, an analysis of the situation and if a
problem exists the actions being taken to correct the problem. If the
problem persists and at the sole discretion of DAAS, DAAS and the Provider
may jointly prepare a written corrective plan with the time lines for
completion. If the Provider fails to carry out the corrective action and
does not meet a 100% Agreement level within the required time frame,
sanctions will be invoked. If, after all appropriate actions have been
taken, the service level still falls to 5% under or increases to 25% over
the Agreement level, DAAS may in its sole discretion, adjust the Agreement
level of service and the budget, thereby the funding, as appropriate.
Page 11 of 25
2. The Provider agrees .that any remedy provided in this
Agreement is in addition to and not in derogation of any other legal or
equitable remedy available to DAAS as a result of breach of this Agreement
by the Provider, whether such breach occurs before or after completion of
the project.
B. APPEAL PROCEDURES
The Provider shall file a formal written grievance with the
DAAS Supervisor of Administrative Services within ten (10) county business
days after the Provider is aware of the factors or conditions precipitating
the agreement dispute. The written grievance shall set forth the subject
of the grievance, identify the agreement clause in dispute, and shall provide
a detailed statement of the grievance, inc%uding dates, names, places, and
the specific remedy or action requested. The filing address is 686 E. Mill
Street, San Bernardino, California 92415-0640. The Supervisor of
Administrative Services shall provide a written response to the Provider
within ten county business days of receipt of the grievance.
If the Provider is not satisfied with the DAAS Supervisor
of Administrative Services' response, the Provider may file a written
grievance appeal, which shall include a statement by the Provider as to
why the Supervisor's response is not satisfactory, to the DAAS Director
within ten county business days of receipt of the Supervisor of
Administrative Services' response. The filing address is'686 E. Mill Street,
San Bernardino, California 92415-0640. The Director will provide a written
response to the Provider within ten county business days.
If the Provider is not satisfied with the DAAS Director's
decision, the written grievance may be registered in writing with the
California Department of Aging, Case Management Branch, 1600 "K" Stree'
Sacramento, California 95814, within ten state business days followi.
receipt of the DAAS Director's decision. The Provider shall submit to the
California Department of Aging the original written grievance along with
a copy of the Supervisor of Administrative Services' written response, the
Provider's appeal to the Director, and the Director's decision. The
California Department of Aging will have final authority for the decision
of grievance claims.
C. EARLY TERMINATION
DAAS may suspend or terminate this Agreement without cause
upon thirty (30) days written notice to the other party, except that such
suspension or termination shall be effective immediately in the case of
threat to health or safety of the public.
ARTICLE IX.
COUNTY RESPONSIBILITIES
The County agrees to:
A. Monitor and evaluate the-performance of the Provider in meeting
the terms of the Agreement and the quality and effectiveness of services
provided based on the criteria as determined by the County.
B. Provide consultation and technical assistance in monitoring
the terms of this Agreement.
Page 12 of 25
C. Approve an audit firm, selected by the Provider, to conduct
a fiscal and program audit as specified in Article III.
D. Compensate Provider for approved expenses in accordance with
............ ~rticle III of this Agreement.
~RTICLE X.
PROVIDER RESPONSIBILITIES
A. GENERAL RESPONSIBILITIES
1. Provider must be incorporated and is responsible for
advising the County of any actual or impending change in incorporation
status.
2. Provider is to promote coordination with other supportive
services. Provider agrees to cooperate with DAAS in its efforts toward
developing a comprehensive and coordinated system of services for the elderly
by participating in joint planning efforts and other activities mutually
agreed upon to meet this goal.
3. If the Provider is a non-profit, private corporation,
the following requirements shall be met:
a. Training in program requirements, agreements with
DAAS and non-profit board responsibilities shall be provided to all Board
members. The training shall include but not be limited to:
(1) Corporate officers and board member's responsibilities
as defined by State law and this contract.
(2) Provider's responsibility for training and placement
~f assigned Senior Employment Program participants.
b. The Board shall be representative of the client
population and geographical regions served by the Contractor.
c. Minutes of Board meetings shall be accurately
maintained and reflect adherence to by-laws.
4. Provider shall maintain and comply with written personnel
policies and procedures consistent with the California Fair Employment and
Housing Act.
Provider shall recruit for vacant positions in an open
and competitive application process free of discriminatory questions.
Written job descriptions for all paid and volunteer personnel shall be
maintained.
5. Provider is responsible for providing orientation and
training for all paid and volunteer staff. Provider shall insure training
is provided at least quarterly for all ~rsonnel. The training shall include
but not be limited to:
a. Material from CDA Policy Memo 95-04 (P) Section H,
and the Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point Program appropriate to
~ach employee or volunteer.
Page 13 of 25
b. The administrators of a volunteer program.
c. The DAAS Management Information System (MIS)o
d. The preparation and submission of reports mandata.d
by law and this Agreement.
Assistance Program.
Appropriate referrals to DAAS Senior Information and
f. Employee training and placement responsibilities for
assigned Senior Employment Program participants.
6. Provider shall complet~ a written
evaluation annually on all paid and volunteer staff.
work performance
7. Provider shall insure all paid and volunteer staff read
and sign a certification of understanding of the Adult Abuse Reporting Act.
8. Provider shall provide the County with photocopies of
all fire and health inspection reports and/or certificates immediately.
9. Provider shall conduct activities to target seniors and
minority individuals for service. Activities shall include, but not be
limited to, outreach and a written analysis of the Contractor's success
in targeting services to minority individuals within their service area.
B. SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED
Provider shall provide all program services and perform all
activities identified in Attachment A to this Agreement for the period J'
1, 1997 through June 30, 1998.
Provider shall, in a satisfactory manner, as determined by
DAAS, conduct, administer and provide Outreach
services for the elderly as defined
in the attached Purchase Order and-~xhibits A1 and B, and Certification
Regarding Lobbying, Exhibit C, which are~-attached hereto 'and incorporated
therein by reference. The aforementioned and all other exhibits are, by
this reference, made a part of this Agreement as those fully set forth here.
1. Provider must provide each elderly person with a free
and voluntary opportunity to contribute to the cost of the service. Provider
must protect the privacy of each person with respect to his/her contribution
and establish appropriate procedures to safeguard and account for all
contributions.
2. Provider must develop a suggested contribution schedule
for services which considers the income ranges of elderly persons in the
community. Suggested contribution schedule is to be approved by DAAS.
3. Participants are to be screened to determine if a need
exists for other services and referred to Senior Information and Assistance
Services for follow-up.
Page 14 of 25
4. Fire and health inspections are to be secured prior. to
beginning service provision and annually thereafter.
5. Provider shall provide a system through which seniors
will have the opportunity to express and have considered their views,
~rievances and complaints regarding the delivery of services. The procedure
must be in writing and made available to all recipients of services.
6. Provider shall employ bilingual staff and/or volunteers
within service areas where a language other than English is commonly spoken.
C. LAWS, LICENSES & STANDARDS
1. The Provider agrees to.. administer this Agreement and
require any subcontractors to administer their subcontracts in accordance
with this Agreement, and with all applicable local, State, and federal laws
including, but not limited to, wages and hours of employment, occupational
safety, and to fire, safety, health, and sanitation regulations, directives,
guidelines, and/or manuals related to this Agreement and resolve all issues
using good administrative practices and sound judgment.
2. Where the State or local public jurisdiction within the
State requires license and/or standards to be met, for the provision of
services, the Provider and its subcontractors will, in performing the
services required under this Agreement, obtain all necessary licenses and/or
permits and maintain such licenses and permits for the full term of the
Agreement. If license and/or standards are required, verification of license
and/or standards will also be required and will occur in conjunction with
monitoring vists.
3. The Provider agrees that the performance of work and
services pursuant to the requirements of this Agreement shall conform to
accepted professional standards.
D. FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY
Provider will ensure that all expenditures are supported by
properly executed payroll, time records, invoices, agreements, vouchers,
orders and any other accounting documents pertaining in whole or in part
to this Agreement. Such documents will be clearly identified and readily
accessible to DAAS staff, as may be required.
E. CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Provider shall make all reasonable efforts to ensure no
conflict of interest exists between its officers, agents or employees.
Provider shall make all reasonable efforts to prevent employees, consultants
or members of governing bodies from using their.position for purposes that
are, or give the appearance of, being motivated by a desire for private
gain for themselves or others, such as those with whom they have family,
business or other ties. i~-the event- the County determines a conflict of
interest situation exists, any increase in costs associated with the conflict
of interest may be disallowed by the County and such conflict may be grounds
for termination of the Agreement.
Page 15 of 25
F. PROHIBITION AGAINST NEPOTISM
Webster's Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary defines nepotism
as follows: "Favoritism shown to a relative (as by giving an appointive
job) on' a basis of relationship."
Persons selected for program staff positions, after t.
effective date of this Agreement, may not be within the immediate family
of other Provider staff in positions of authority, members of the Provider's
governing board, or DAAS staff. Individuals within the immediate family
of program staff may not serve on the Provider's governing board.
An individual may have been selected or elected to the
governing board before the effective date of this agreement, who has
immediate family employed by the program. Either the Board member or the
employed member(s) of the board member's immediate family, must resign from
their position(s) within thirty (30) days of the effective date of this
Agreement.
Immediate family is spouse, child, grandchild, mother, father,
grandparents, brother, sister, mother-in-law, father-in-law, daughter-in-
law, son-in-law, aunt, uncle, niece, nephew, and members of the same
household.
G. AMENDMENTS TO AGREEMENT
Any Agreement change requires initiation of a change to the
Agreement in writing. Modification or amendment, as determined by DAAS,
shall be signed by both parties.
H. GREATEST ECONOMIC OR SOCIAL NEED
The Provider understands that one of its responsibilitie~
under this Agreement is to ensure that "preference will be given to providing
services to older individuals with the greatest economic or social needs
(Older Americans Act of 1965 as Amended, Amendments of 1991, Public Law
98-459, 306 (a) (5) (A) (u) (I) (II)." "The term 'greatest economic need'
means the need resulting from an income level at or below the poverty
threshold established by the Bureau of the Census, and the term 'greatest
socal need' means the need caused by non-economic factors which include
physical or mental disabilities, language barriers, and cultural or social
isolation including that caused by racial or ethnic status which restricts
an individual's ability to perform normal daily tasks or which threatens
his or her capacity to live independently." (Older Americans Act of 1965
as Amended, Amendments of 1991, Public Law 98-459, 306 (a) (5) (B)). Minimum
program goals relating to minorities within this Agreement have been
established by computing the percentage of minority elderly over 60 within
the geographic area served by the Provider.
I. PROVIDER INDEPENDENCE
The Provider and the agents and employees of the Provider
in the performance of this Agreement shall act in an independent capacity
and not as officers, or employees or agents of DAAS, the County of San
Bernardino or the State of California.
Page 16 of 25
J. TRAINING AND MANPOWER DEVELOPMENT
The Provider agrees to participate in appropriate staff
training and development provided by DAAS, the CDA and the Administration
~n Aging.
K. RECORDS
1. The Provider shall, at all times during the term of this
Agreement, maintain complete fiscal, program and management records (which
shall include, but not be limited to, accounting records, grants, agreements,
letters of agreement, insurance documentation in accordance with Article
XI, Memorandums and/or Letters of Understanding and client records) of its
activities and expenditures hereunder in a"form satisfactory to.the County
and/or State and in accordance with generally accepted accounting procedures.
All records pertaining to the project shall be available for review and
audit by the County, State or federal government or their duly authorized
agents, at any time during normal business hours. All such records must
be maintained and kept available by the Provider, (a) until an audit has
occurred and an audit resolution has been issued or unless otherwise
authorized in writing by DAAS, (b) for such longer period, if any, as is
required by applicable statute, by any other clause of this Agreement, or
by Sections B or C, or (c) for such longer period as DAAS deems necessary,
which will be a minimum of three (3) years after final payment under this
Agreement.
2. If this agreement is completely or partially terminated,
the records relating to the work terminated shall be preserved and made
available for the same periods as specified in Section 1.
3. In the event of any litigation, claim, negotiation, audit
exception, or other action involving the records, all records relative to
such action shall be maintained and kept available until every action has
been cleared to the satisfaction of the County and/or State and the Provider
is advised in writing of the resolution.
4. Adequate source documentation of each transaction shall
be maintained relative to the allowability of expenditures reimbursed by
the County under this Agreement.. If the allowability of expenditures cannot
be determined because records or documentation of the Provider are
nonexistent or inadequate according to generally accepted accounting
principles, the expenditures will be questioned in the audit and may be
disabllowed by the County and/or State during the audit resolution process.
a. Accounting Records (CDA PM, Section G, Paragraph 93.7a)
The Provider shall provide for adequate accounting
systems and procedures to control and support'. all fiscal activities in
accordance with policies issued by the Administration on Aging and the
California Department on Aging. The Provider shall provide for those
designated in the Chart of Accounts as identified by the categories in the
budget display.
It is mandatory that the Provider report fiscal
operations to DAAS using the categories of transactions detailed in the
Chart of Accounts.
Page 17 of 25
through 93.21)
be
Internal Control (CDA PM, Section G, Paragraph 9~-.11
Effective control and accountability shall ~e
maintained for all grant cash, real and personal property and other ass,~
Provider shall adequately safeguard all assets and shall assure that th
are used solely for authorized purposes.
c. Budgetary Control (CDA PM, Section G, Paragraph 93.23)
All budget changes within major categories, such as
Salaries and Benefits, Equipment or Other Costs exceeding 10% of the approved
budget, for that major category, represents a departure from the approved
project plans and require DAAS' approval'. Budget modification requests
will be made to DAAS in the form of a written justification outlining
specific shifts of funds that will be made. Note: The total amount of
the change must not result in the Title III funds exceeding the authorized
amount for all Title III funds.
d. Allowable Costs (CDA PM, Section G, Paragraph 93.31)
OMB Circular A-122, "Cost Principles for Non-Profit
Organizations" shall be used as a guide for determining allowable costs.
e. Source Documentation (CDA PM, Section G, Paragraph
93.39)
Accounting records shall be supported by source
documentation such as cancelled checks, original invoices, time sheets and
payroll records, grant and contract award documents, in-kind documentati~
etc., which are maintained to comply with record retention requirements.
L. REPORTS
1. Provider, at such times and in such forms as DAAS may
require, shall furnish statements, records, reports data and information
requested by DAAS pertaining to Provider performance of services hereunder
and other matters covered by this Agreement. The forms shall be reviewed
for timeliness, completeness, and correctness of the information submitted,
by the Program Director or his/her designee, prior to submission to DAAS.
Incomplete forms shall be returned to the Provider for completion. (In
the event of changes in these forms, DAAS shall advise the Provider via
written notice.) The Provider shall develop and implement a process for
ensuring quality control.
2. Provider shall meet the following standards for its
financial management systems, as provided in the Title III Program Manual:
a. Financial Reporting (CDA PM, Section G, Paragraph
93.5a)
Accurate, current and complete disclosure of the
financial results of each program shall be made in accordance with the
financial reporting requirements of the grant. The following reports are
to be submitted to DAAS when indicated:
Page 18 of 25
1)
Monthly (Due by 5th working day of the month).
Monthly Program Expenditure Report/Request
Reimbursement
for
2)
Semi-annually
Budget Revision ~1 (Due November 1)
Budget Revision ~2 (Due March 31)
3) Annually
Financial Close-Out Report (Due August 1)
Periodic Inventory (Due August 1 with Closeout)
Audit Report (Due October 31)
Revised Financial Close-out Report (Due
October 31 with Audit Report)
when indicated:
be
Program Reporting
The following reports are to be submitted to DAAS
1) Monthly (Due by the 5th working day of each month)
III B Monthly Supportive Services Report
2) Quarterly
Program modification request in writing to DAAS.
Contractor will describe, in detail, necessary
program change(s) and the reason(s) for the
requested modification.
3. DAAS may require financial reports more frequently than
indicated above or with more detail (or both), upon written notice to the
Provider, until such time as DAAS determines that the financial management
standards are met.
4. Provider is required to work in conjunction with the
Department of Aging and Adult Services in developing and maintaining a Client
Data Base. Unless otherwise specified, the National Aging Program
Information System (NAPIS) Ontrack client tracking system will be used to
collect data. The Provider is responsible for filling out the Client Intake
Form, and transmitting the client information to DAAS on an ongoing basis.
The Provider is also responsible for all equipment installed at their site(s)
which will be used to automate client units of service. Said Provider is
responsible for maintaining the equipment in goodworking order and replacing
the equipment should it be damaged and/or stolen. Unless otherwise
specified, equipment installed at each individual site includes one (1)
DuraWand, one (1) Fax Modem, and one (1) Wall Timer.
M. PROPERTY MANAGEMENT
1. All equipment purchases over $500.00 require the written
approval of the Director of the Department of Aging and Adult Services or
his designee prior to purchase.
Page 19 of 25
2. All equipment, materials, supplies or personal property
of any kind purchased with agreement funds provided herein shall be in
accordance with CDA PM, Part G, Section 93.19, and if not fully expended
or consumed prior to the termination of this Agreement shall be the property
of the CDA, unless otherwise directed by the CDA. All equipment must ' .....
used to conduct business under this Agreement.
3. The Provider shall exercise due care in the use,
maintenance, protection, and preservation of personal property during the
period of the project. The Provider shall be held liable for all losses
of or damage to non-expendable equipment or material resulting from
negligence or improper implementation of safeguards.
4. The Provider shall recor~ the following information when
property is acquired:
a.
b.
c.
Date acquired.
Property description (include model number).
Property identification number (serial number).
d. Cost or other basis of valuation.
e. Fund source, and
The Provider shall keep track of property purchased with
funds under this Agreement. The Provider shall submit to DAAS, annually
with the Close-out, a current inventory of property furnished or purchased
with funds awarded under the terms of this Agreement or any predecessor
agreement for the same purpose.
5. a. The disposal, loss and/or destruction of prope~.~
or equipment shall be fully documented by the Provider with copies thereof
provided to DAAS along with the monthly expense report for the month in
which the loss occurred.
b. The Prouider shall immediately investigate and within
days fully document the loss, destruction, or theft of such
five (5)
property.
c. Loss by fire, vandalism, or theft must be immediately
reported to the fire department or law enforcement agency, as applicable.
A copy of the fire department or law enforcement agency report of the
incident shall also be forwarded to DAAS.
d. DAAS shall be notified of the loss within seventy-
two (72) hours of the discovery of the loss.
6. The Provider shall exercise due care in the use,
maintenance, protection, and preservation of such property during the period
of the project, and shall assume responsibility for replacement or repair
of such-p~operty during the period of the project and until the Provider
has complied with all written instructions from the State via DAAS regarding
the final disposition of the property.
7. In the event of the Provider' s dissolution or u- ~
termination of this Agreement, the Provider shall provide a final propc
inventory to DAAS.
Page 20 of 25
8. The Provider shall use the property for the purpose ~or
which it was intended under the Agreement. In no instance shall equipment
be loaned to other programs or organizations without the written approval
of the Director of the Department of Aging and Adult Services or his
~esignee.
9. The Provider or subcontractor shall not use equipment
or supplies acquired under this Agreement with federal and/or state monies
for personal gain or to usurp the competitive advantage of a privately-owned
business entity.
10. If purchase of equipment is a reimbursable item, the
equipment to be purchased will be specified.in the budget.
11. The Provider shall include the provisions contained in
Article III, Section E in all its subcontracts awarded under this Agreement.
12. Equipment that is worn beyond economical repair must be
reported to DAAS on the monthly expense report. It shall be the
responsibility of DAAS after receiving this report to instruct the Provider
as to the proper method of disposal.
13. Once Provider has
a vehicle to be salvaged, Provider
lettering, signs, etc., are removed.
received disposal authorization for
shall ensure that all identifying
14. Prior to replacement of any property, Provider must obtain
written authorization from DAAS.
15. Any equipment purchased with agreement funds will be
~ubject to inspection, over the life of the equipment, and if not used,
under-used or misused, may be claimed by DAAS for redistribution to other
DAAS projects.
16. Vehicles purchased with agreement funds shall also have
the following language painted or affixed by other means on the vehicle:
"Vehicle purchased with Older Americans Act Funds."
17. Any equipment purchased shall be reported on the
Expenditure and Claim for Reimbursement Report for the month in which the
equipment was purchased. DAAS will verify approval for purchase was given
prior to the purchase of the equipment.
18. Equipment will be periodically inventoried by DAAS to
insure all equipment purchases are properly approved, documented, and
recorded on the inventory. Significant violations may result in the
imposition of sanctions.
N. Provider shall notify the County, in writing, of any change
in mailing address and/or physical location within (10) days of the address
change.
O. Provider shall comply with all applicable local health and
safety codes, including fire clearances, for each site where program services
are provided under the terms of this Agreement.
Page 21 of 25
J?
ARTICLE XI.
GENERAL PROVISIONS
A. This Agreement has no force or effect until signed by both
parties.
B. County shall have Power of Attorney to pay delinquent de!
and unpaid wages incurred by Provider, from appropriated funds under th__
Agreement, in the event debts and wages have not been paid or are not
current.
C. Provider understands and agrees that the Agreement shall be
governed and construed in accordance with the Older Americans Act of 1965
as amended and with California State and Federal laws. ..
D. The Provider and its subcontractors shall not lawfully
discriminate, harass, or allow harassment against any employee or applicant
for employment because of sex, race, color, ancestry, religious creed,
national origin, disability (i~ncluding HIV and AIDS), medical condition
(cancer), age or marital status, denial of family and medical care leave
and denial of pregnancy disability leave. The Provider and its
subcontractors shall insure that the evaluation and treatment of their
employees and applicants for employment are free from such discrimination
and harassment. The Provider and its subcontractors agree to fully comply
with the laws and programs (including regulations issued pursuant thereto)
which are listed following this paragraph and/or referenced in other sections
of this Agreement. Such compliance is required to the extent that such
laws, programs and their regulations are by their own terms, applicable
to this Agreement. Provider warrants that he/she will make himself/herself
thoroughly familiar with the applicable provisions of said laws, programs
and regulations prior to commencing performance of the Agreement. DAAS
will provide assistance to Provider in obtaining copies of said la~
programs and regulations upon request. To the extent applicable
provisions of said laws, programs and regulations are deemed to be a part
of this Agreement as if fully set forth herein.
1. The San Bernardino County Affirmative Action Compliance
Program, Policy 11-15, Minority Business Enterprise (MBE) 15% and Women
Business Enterprise (WBE) 5%.
2. Vietnam Era Veterans ' Readjustment Assistance Acts of
1972 and 1974, as amended. Pub. L. 92-540, Title V, Section 503 (a), Pub.
L-93-508, Title IV, as amended, Section 402. (38 USCA 2021-2027).
3. California Fair Employment and Housing Act, Government
Code Section 12900, et. seq.
This Provider shall include the nondiscrimination and
compliance provisions of this clause in all subcontracts to perform work
compliance provisions of this clause in all subcontracts to perform work
under this Agreement.
4. Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended in 1991 (42 USCA
2000a to 2000h6) and Executive Order 11375 and as supplemented in Department
of Labor regulations (41 CFR, Part 60). (See Exhibit C.)
Page 22 of 25
5. Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1990.
6. Title III Program Manual for Area Agencies On Aging.
7. Grants in Excess of $100,000.
Clean Air Act as amended (42 USCA 7401); Clean Water Act
as amended (33 1368); Federal Water Pollution Control Act as amended (33
USCA 1251, et. seq.); and Environmental Protection Agency Regulations (40
CFR Part 15 and Executive Order 11738).
8. Providers Participating in Facility Construction or Repair
Davis-Bacon Act (40 USCA 256a-7) (29 CFR, Part 5); Copeland
"Anti-Kickback" Act (18 USCA 874, 40 USCA 276a) (29 CFR, Part 3); Grant
Work Hours and Safety Standards Act (40 USCA 327-330) (29 CFR, Part 5);
and Executive Order 11246 of September 14, 1965, entitled "Equal Employment
Opportunity" as amended by Executive Order 11375 of October 13, 1967, as
supplemented in Department of Labor Regulations (41, CFR Part 60).
9. Provisions Against Lobbying
Exhibit C to this Agreement entitled "Certification
Regarding Lobbying".
10. The Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990. (42 USC
12101.)
The purpose of the Act is to support individuals with
disabilities to access employment and various services in both the public
lnd private sectors. The Act establishes civil rights for individuals with
disabilities.
11. Elder and Dependent Adult Abuse Reporting Requirement
Provider will ensure that all known or suspected instances
or elder or dependent adult abuse are reported to DAAS .Adult Protection
Services staff.
In accordance with Welfare and Institutions Code 15630
(a) all employees of the Provider and its subcontractors are mandated
reporters of elder and dependent adult abuse. Mandated reporters are
required to report all instances of physical abuse of elderly and dependent
adults and may report other types of abuse. Physical abuse must be reported
under the following circumstances: 1) When the reporter has observed an
incident that reasonably appears to be physical abuse; 2) When the reporter
has observed a physical injury where the nature of the injury, its location
on the body, or the repetition of the injury clearly indicates that physical
abuse has occurred; 3) When the reporter is told by an elder or dependent
adult that he or she has experienced behavior constituting physical abuse.
A telephone report of physical abuse must be made -immediately or as soon
as possible. A written "Report of Dependent Adult/Elder Abuse" (SOC 341)
must follow within two (2) working days. Incidents of elder and dependent
adult abuse must be reported to the correct agency as follows: 1) If the
abuse has occurred in a long term care facility, except a State mental
hospital or State developmental center, the report shall be made to the
local Long Term Care Ombudsman or local law enforcement; 2) If the abuse
has occurred in a State mental hospital or State developmental center, the
Page 23 of 25
report shall be made to the designated investigators of the State Department
of Mental Health or the State Department of Developmental Services or to
the local law enforcement; 3) If the abuse occurred anywhere other than
a long term care facility or state mental hospital or state developmental
center,' the report shall be made to Adult Protective Services or local
enforcement. Under the terms of this contract as changes in the Elder
Dependent Adult Reporting Law are enacted the Provider is bound to
with the most current regulations.
E. Disaster Preparedness
In order to provide emergency assistance or continue services
to at-risk elderly or dependent adults in the event of disaster, Provider
will maintain accurate lists of all clientS. who are receiving home-delivered
meals and/or other services due to impairments which render them at risk
of serious injury or death. Provider will coordinate and report disaster
services and issues with DDAS.
F. Publications
Any books, reports, pamphlets, papers, articles, or other
materials published or transferred, including newspaper reports, based on
activities funded by this Agreement, must (a) carry an acknowledgement of
funding by the San Bernardino County DAAS. The following language should
be used: "These materials or products are the result of a project funded
in part or in whole by the County of San Bernardino Department of Aging
and Adult Services through the Older Americans Act, as amended;" (b) give
the name of the entity, the address, and telephone number at which the
supporting data is available; (c) include a statement that the conclusions
and opinions expressed may not be those of the State and/or DAAS and that
the publication may not be based upon or inclusive of all raw data.
G. Copyrights
If the Agreement results in a book or other copyrightable
material(s), the author is free to copyright the work, but DAAS reserves
a royalty-free, non-exclusive and irrevocable license to rgproduce, publish
or otherwise use, and to authorize others to use, all copyrighted material
which can be copyrighted resulting from the Agreement.
H. Unauthorized Activities
All activities not expressly authorized by this Agreement
shall be prohibited without the express written permission of the DAAS
Director or his authorized agent.
I. Binding Contract
In the event any portion of this Agreement is found to be
invalid, the remaining portions shall continue to constitute a valid and
binding Agreement.
proselytizing
Agreement.
Religious Activity Prohibited
Provider agrees it will not perform or permit any religious
activities in connection with the performance of t~s
Page 24 of 25
K. Entire Agreement
This Agreement consisting of 25 pages and Exhibits A through
C inclusive, is the full and complete document describing services to be
~rovided by the Provider to County. There are no other or further written
3r oral understandings or agreements with respect to this Agreement. No
variation or modification of this Agreement and no waivers of its provisions
shall be valid unless in writing and signed by all parties.
DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF AGING AND ADULT SERVICES
AUTHORIZED AGENCY REPRESENTATIVE, TITLE
Page 25 of 25
Exhibit A-1
WORK PLAN
FY 1998-99
This work plan contains the measurable objectives mandated by
DAAS of the service provider. The work plan specifies and
establishes time frames either on an annual basis or, where
required by state regulations, on a 'quarterly basis. The work
plan constitutes the primary document for ongoing monitoring,
Annual Program Performance Review/Fiscal Audit and will be used
to measure the provider's efforts toward providing quality
Recreation services.
Scope of Work
A. Geographic Area/Clientele and Eligibility Criteria
1. The geographic area served by this provider covers
the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
The clientele served by this agreement consists
of seniors 60 and over.
B. Program Description
Purpose: Recreation is provided to maintain or
improve the well-being of older persons through
provision of necessary services by community and/or
senior centers.
Definition: Recreation activities which focus
on physical, social, psychological, educational
and recreational needs of older persons.
C. Intended Outcomes
1. Recreation
a. Provide 200 hours of social, art/recreation-
al, health and/or nutritional services to
improve the well-being of seniors.
Staff and/or volunteers providing services must
be trained and qualified in the safe provision
of Recreation services. Recreation services must
be provided to at least 60 unduplicated seniors
of which 8 are to be minority low-income seniors.
(See Exhibit B.).
II.
Develop and have on hand, for review by DAAS, a
cost allocation plan which explains the methods
used to allocate costs between programs with funds
received from DAAS.
Conduct a client or participant satisfaction survey
at least once a year. The survey form must be
approved by designated DAAS staff prior to its
use and all findings from the survey must be used
to improve services. The returned surveys and
tabulated results must .be kept on file for review
by DAAS staff.
Service Delivery Activities
A. Staffing
Sufficient personnel shall be available to carry out
the needs of the program. This includes a Director
and additional personnel as determined by the size
of the service area and the method and level of service
provision needed to fully comply with the terms of
this work plan and agreement.
B. Volunteer Staff
1. Volunteers are individuals who work without pay
in the performance of essential duties to conduct
the program. In some cases, the Director may be
a volunteer.
2. Volunteers shall not replace paid personnel.
Ce
Clients will be given priority for services who are
socially and/or economically needy and who are not
eligible for services from any other source.
Further, individuals referred by DAAS staff shall be
given first priority for services under this agreement.
Definitions:
Economically Needy: Seniors whose income
is at or below the SSI/SSP level.
Socially Needy: Seniors who have at
least two of the following character-
istics: Disabled, Language/Communication
Barrier, Lives Alone, Age 75+.
D. Training Activities
Provide training both on the job and in formal
training sessions, as appropriate, to improve the
understanding of paid staff about the service(s)
being provided. Wherever required by law and/or
III.
ordinance licensed staff must be trained to carry
out assigned duties. In addition, annually evaluate
paid staff performance to determine his/her
effectiveness, skill development and understanding
of tasks they are assigned. Documentation of
training shall be kept on file at the provider's
main office for review by DAAS during program
monitoring to be scheduled and conducted by DAAS.
Volunteers should be provided on the job training
and opportunities for formal training to improve
skills and understandfng of the service being
provided. Wherever required by law or ordinance
volunteers must be trained and/or licensed to carry
out assigned duties. Documentation of training
shall be kept on file at the provider's main office
for review by DAAS during program monitoring to
be scheduled and conducted by DAAS staff.
Other Service Requirements
A. Physical Set-Up
Where services are provided in a care center, office
or any setting outside the client's home, the
environment must be attractive, clean and free
from obstacles which could cause injury.
Post floor plans identifying emergency exits,
assembly areas, etc. and conduct evacuation drills
at least twice a year. Proof of evacuation drills
will be kept on file duly signed by the Fire Marshal
or other authorized agency within the community
where the service site is located.
B. Donations and Confidentiality
Encourage seniors to donate by letting them know
verbally that donations are accepted and are
important to maintaining the service(s) provided.
Post signs where appropriate stating that donations
are accepted. The provider shall not in any way
employ tactics which could be viewed as coercion,
embarrassing, and/or obligatory to the service
being provided.
All contributions shall be used to increase the
amount of service being provided in the program(s)
funded by DAAS.
Coordination Activities
1.. Provider shall participate within appropriate
coordination bodies established by state law and/or
county ordinance.
Provider shall include the following statement
on all advertising, posters and brochures, etc.:
"Funding for this service has been provided by
the San Bernardino County Department of Aging and
Adult Services through a grant award from the
California Department of Aging."
Provider shall coordinate service with other county
departments and local agencies by providing time
within the facility during participant meetings,
staff meetings and volunteer meetings, etc., for
presentations on special activities that promote
a Community Based System of Care for elderly
clients. All coordination activities must be
documented and kept on file for review by DAAS.
Provider shall coordinate service with other county
departments and local agencies by providing time
for presentations or special activities that promote
a Community Based System of Care for the elderly
participants attending their sites. All such
activities must be documeted and kept on file for
review by DAAS.
D. Reporting Requirements
Report all known or suspected cases of elderly
or dependent adult abuse to DAAS Adult Protective
Services or law enforcement immediately or as soon
as possible by telephone, and send a written report
within two (12) working days. Abuse of an elder
.or dependent adult means physical abuse, neglect,
intimidation, cruel punishment, fiduciary abuse,
abandonment, isolation or other treatment with
resulting physical harm or pain or mental suffering
or the deprivation by a care custodian of goods
or services which are necessary to avoid physical
harm or mental suffering.
Report service and client data by the 5th working
day of the month on CDA 186 forms which will be
verified by DAAS during the annual program audit.
Additionally, establish audit files which include
but are not limited to a copy of the 186 report.
Report monthly expenditures to DAAS by the 5th
working day of the month. Maintain support files
including but not limited to~ invoices, payroll,
and other supporting documents, all of which will
be attached to a copy of the expenditures report
and kept on file by month for review during the
Annual Audit.
Maintain records, by month,
in-kind expenditures.
that support claimed
In the event additional funds become available, the provider
will use the funds to increase the Recreation services provided
to elderly clients by either increasing the number of individuals
served or by increasing the units of service provided or both.
Exceptions to this requirement, for instance the use of additional
funds to purchase equipment, must be fully documented in writing
and submitted to the department for prior approval. Failure
to abide by this work plan will constitute just cause for
sanctions being imposed.
.~ounty of San L
;ontfact Agency Name: CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA
· ,a~'din0' Department Of Agir{g'& Adult Services
BUDGET DISPLAY
Budget for Fiscal Year: ] 998-99
CONTRACTOR INFORMATION
Proqram
RECREATION
Conlract P.O. No:
ExhiL,.
Odginel [ X !
Rev~d I I
Date: 9-16-98
: Seniota :': Minorilies ': ~i~Units "
· !11 iToBe ':: To Be'~ :ii'~:~i:~:Of Project i MATCH :
# Setred Sewed ': ' ':Se~ce TiUe III Funds Income ' Cash ' In-Kind: Tot. al
15dl 150 20 Z00 Hours $3,000.00 $50.00 $333.00 $3,383.00
DAAS
USE ONLY
~' GRC' Codes
ATTACHMENT C
San Bernardino County
CDA 217 {6/96)
Department of Aging and Adult Services
CERTIFICATION REGARDING LOBBYING
CERTIFICATION FOR CONTRACTS, GRANTS, LOANS, AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS
The undersigned certifies, to the best of his or her knowl..edge and belief, that:
(1) No federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the
undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or
employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress,
or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any federal
contract, the breaking of any federal grant, the making of any federal loan, the ente~ng
into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal,
amendment, or modification of any federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative
agreement.
(2) If any funds other than federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any
person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency,
a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a
Member of Congress in connection with this federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative
agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, "Disclosure
Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions.
(3) The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the
award documents for all subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and
contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all subrecipients
shall certify and disclosure accordingly.
This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this
transaction was mode or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making
or entering into lhi$ transaction imposed by Section 1352, Title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who
fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of nol less than $10,000 and
not more than $100,000 for each such failure.
CONTRACTOR
STATE
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE
TITLE
DATE
ORDINANCE NO. 594
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 15,
CHAPTER 15.12 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL
CODE REGARDING REVIEW OF GRADING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS.
A. RECITALS.
1. On June 10, and continued to July 22, 1998, the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly-noticed public hearing with respect
to the above-referenced Municipal Code Amendment and, following the conclusion
thereof, adopted its Resolution No. 98-44, recommending that the City Council of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt said amendment.
2. On December 16, 1998, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted and concluded a duly-noticed public hearing concerning the subject
amendment to the Municipal Code.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.
B. ORDINANCE.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: The City Council hereby specifically finds that all of th~ facts
set forth in Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and
correct.
SECTION 2:
The City Council hereby finds and determines that the
subject amendment identified in this Ordinance is exempt
from the requirements of the California Environmental
Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines
promulgated thereunder, pursuant toSection 15061 (b)(3) of
Chapter 3 of Division 6 of Title 14 of the California Code of
Regulations.
SECTION 3:
Section 15.12.220, Appendix Section 7006 -- Plans and
Specifications, Subsections (d) and (e) are hereby amended
to read, in words and figures, as follows:
Ordinance 594
Page 2
(d)
(e)
Soils Engineerinq Report. The soils
Engineering Report required by Subsection
(c) shall include data regarding the nature,
distribution and strength of existing soils,
conclusions and recommendations for
grading procedure.s and design criteria for
corrective measures including buttress fills,
when necessary, and opinions and
recommendations covering adequacy for the
intended use of sites to be developed by the
proposed grading as affected by soils
engineering factors, including the stability of
slopes. Recommendations included in the
soils Engineering Report and approved by tt~
building official shall be incorporated into the
Grading Plan or Specifications.
Engineerinq Geology Report. The Engineering
Geology Report required by Subsection (a) shall
include an adequate description of the geology of
the site, conclusions and recommendations
regarding the effect of geologic conditions on the
proposed development, and opinions and
recommendations covering the adequacy for the
intended use of sites to be developed by the
proposed grading as affected by geological
factors. Recommendations included in the report
and approved by tho Dullcling Official shall be
incorporated in the Grading Plans or
Specifications.
SECTION 4:
Section 15.12.250, Appendix Section 7010 --Fills,
Subsections (a) and (e) are hereby amended to read, in
words and figures, as follows:
SECTION 7010
(a) FilI~. Unless otherwise recommended in the
approved soils Engineering Report andapproved
by tho Dullcling O[l~¢i&l, fills shall conform to the
provisions of this Section and to Figure A, Typical
Lot Cross-section for Fills.
EXCEPTION:
The provisions of this section may be waived by
the Building Official for minor fills not intended to
support structures.
Ordinance 594
Page 3
(e) Compaction. All Fills, including backfill in utility
trenches, shall be compacted to a minimum of 90
percent of maximum density.
EXCEPTIONS:
1. Fills exem/:)ted elsewhere in this Ordinance
and where the Building Official determines that
Compaction is not a necessary safety measure to
aid in/~reventing saturation, settlement, sli/~Ding,
or erosion of the Fill.
2. Where lower density and expansive tv~)es of
soil exist, Dermission for lesser Comoaction may
be granted by the Building Official uDon showing
of good cause under the conditions /~rovided
herein.
3. A/ternate methods of filling and com/:)action
may be ~tilized on utility trenches or other
specific ~rojects when recommended by the soils
Engineering Report and ~pl~rOv~d by the Dullcling
SECTION 5:
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word
of this Ordinance is, for any reason, deemed or held to be
invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of
competent jurisdiction, or preempted by legislative
enactment, such decision or legislation shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City
Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares
that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section,
subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word thereof,
regardless of the fact that any one or more sections,
subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or words might
subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional or
preempted by subsequent legislation.
SECTION 6:
The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance
and shall cause the same to be published within 15 days
after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily
Bulletin a newspaper of general circulation published in the
City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California.
7/
ORDINANCE NO. 595
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 16 OF
THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING
THE EXTENSION OF SUBDIVISION MAPS.
.,
A. RECITALS.
1. On June 10, and continued to July 22, 1998, the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted duly-noticed Public Hearings with respect
to the above-referenced Municipal Code Amendment and, following the conclusion
thereof, adopted its Resolution No. 98-45, recommending that the City Council of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt said amendment.
2. On December 16, 1998, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted and concluded a duly-noticed Public Hearing concerning the subject
amendment to the Municipal Code.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.
B. ORDINANCE.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set
forth in Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and
correct.
SECTION 2:
This Council hereby finds and determines that the subject
amendment identified in this Ordinance is exempt from the
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of
1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated
thereunder, pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of Chapter 3 of
Division 6 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.
SECTION 3:
16.16.160 -
A.
Section 16.16.160.A. is hereby is amended to read, in words
and figures, as follows:
ExDirat!on.
The approval or conditional approval of a Tentative Subdivision Map shall
expire three years tw~rHy four month~ from the date of the adoption of the
resolution by the Planning Commission approving or conditionally approving
the map. An extension to the expiration date may be approved as provided
in Section 16.16.170(-B-~.
Ordinance 595
Page 2
SECTION 4: Section 16.16.170 is hereby amended to read in words and
figures, as follows:
16.16.170 - Extensions.
A. Reauest by Subdivider. The Subdivider or his representative may request
an extension of the expiration date of the approved or conditionally
approved Tentative Subdivision M,~p by written application to the
Community Development Department. The application shall be filed not
less than sixty days before the map is to expire, and shall state the reasons
for requesting the extension.
D. City Planner Action. The City Planner may extend the approval of a
Tcntative Tm~ Map if he finds that them has bccn no significant changes
in the General Plan La/tcl U~e Clemcnt, D~vctop,,~nt Cocl~ or othcr
applicable Specific/Com,~tunity Plan, oh&factor of the arco within which thc
map is located, or cu,~nt planning policy or pest practice their would causc
thc approved nlap to become inconsistent or non-conforming. If the City
Planner finds that there is significant ch&n~e, the City Planetar shall re for the
cxtension roqucst to the Planning Commission for consideration.
B. Planning Commission Action. All time extension requests shall be
processed in the same manner as the original Tentative Subdivision Map in
accordance with Chapter 16.16.
C. Time Limit of Extension. Extensions may be granted in twelve month
increments for a period orp~,;od3 not exceeding a total of tW'ee five years.
D. Conditions of Approval. As a condition of the extension of a Tentative
Tract Map, after conducting a Public Headrig, the City Planner or Planning
Commission may impose new conditions or revise existing conditions on the
approved Tentative Map as they find necessary. All Public Hea~ing Notice
requirements of the State Subdivision Map Act shall apply.
E. Aooeal of Extension. The Subdivider may appeal in writing any action of
the C;~'! Plann~'to the Plannin§ C~,~mis$ion, or any action of the Planning
Commission to the City Council, within fifteen days of such action in
conformance to Section 16.16.130.
F. Fee. The fee for processing an extension shall be pursuant to the City's
Fee Resolution.
G. Findings. The granting of an extension shall require the Planning
Commission to make all of the findings in accordance with Section
16.16.100. all of th~ following findings to be ,,mdc by the approving body:
1. The prcviou3ly approvcd Tentative Mc.p is in substanti61
compliance with the City'~ cu,~¢nt C,~neral Plan, Specific Plans,
Ordinances, plans, cod~s and policies;
2. The extension of the Tontc, tivo Map will not cause significant
inconsistencies with thc current General Plan, Specific Plans,
Ordinances, plans, codes and policies;
Ordinance 595
Page 3
3. The extension of the Tentative Map is not likely to cause public
health and safety p~blcms;
4. The extension is ~vithin the tinge limits prescribed by State law
and local o~inonco.
Unless ell of the above findings a/'c ~)iadc bytho approving body, the
requested extension shall bc dcnie'd.
SECTION 5: Section 16.20.090 is hereby amended to read, in words and
figures, as follows:
16.20.090 - Expiration. The approval or conditional approval of the Tentative
Parcel Map shall expire three years twenty-four months from the date of adoption
of the Resolution by the Planning Commission approving or conditionally approving
the map. The expiration of the approved or conditionally approved Tentative Parcel
Map shall terminate all proceedings and no parcel map of all or any portion of the
real property included within such Tentative Parcel Map shall be filed without first
processing a new Tentative Parcel Map.
SECTION 6:
16.20.100 -
A.
Section 16.20.100 is hereby amended to read in words and
figures, as follows:
Extensions.
Request by Subdivider. The Subdivider or his representative may request
an extension of the expiration date of the approved or conditionally
approved Tentative Map by wdtten application to the Community
Development Director. The application shall be filed not less than sixty days
prior to the expiration date and shall state the reasons for requesting the
extension.
13. C/b/Cn~jineer Action. The City £nginccr may extend tl~ app~val of ~
T~ntativo Parc~ M6p if he finds that th~ has bo~n no significant changes
in the C~n~ral Plan Land Use £1c,~cnt, Daveiopn~ont Cod~ or other
applicable Spocific/C~,~]~]unity Plan, chal, ecter of tha ansa v~hin which the
map i~ located, or cu, w~nt planning policy or past pfactica that would cause
the app~vcd ~ap to l~omc inconsistent or non-confem~ing. If the City
Engineer finds that ttto~o is significant change, tha City £nginoar shaft ~cfcr
the ~xt~nsion ~cquest to the Planning C~m,ld~sion for consideration.
B. Planninq Commission Action. All time extension requests shall be
processed in the same manner as original Tentative Parcel Map in
accordance with Chapter 16.20.
C. Time Limit of Extension. Extensions may be granted for a pedod or
periods not exceeding a total of t/wee two years.
?¥
Ordinance 595
Page 4
D. Conditions of Approval. As a condition of the extension of a Tentative
Parcel Map, after conducting a Public Hearing, the City £ngin~cr or
Planning Commission may impose new conditions or revise existing
conditions on the approved Tentative Parcel Map as they find necessary.
All Public Hearing Notice requirements of the State Subdivision Map Act
shall apply. '.
E. Ar~Deal of Extension. The Subdivider may appeal in wdting any action of
the City £nginccr to the Plannin,~ C~mmis~ion or any action of the Planning
Commissior, to the City Council, within fifteen days of such action in
conformance to Section 16.16.130.
F. Fee. The fee for processing an extension shall be pursuant to the City's Fee
Resolution.
G. Findinqs. The granting of an extension shall require the Planning
Commission to make all of the findings in accordance with Section
16.20.060.
SECTION 7:
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word
of this Ordinance is, for any reason, deemed or held to be
invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of
competent jurisdiction, or preempted by legislative
enactment, such decision or legislation shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City
Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares
that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section,
subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word thereof,
regardless of the fact that any one or more sections,
subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or words might
subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional or
preempted by subsequent legislation.
SECTION 8:
The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance
and shall cause the same to be published within 15 days
after its passage at least once in the Inland Vatley Daily
Bulletin a newspaper of general circulation published in the
City of Ontario, California, and circutated in the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California.
ORDINANCE NO. 596
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 98-01, AMENDING
SECTION 17.02.100 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA
DEVELOPMENT CODE, REGARDING LAPSE OF APPROVALS
AND EXTENSIONS. "
A. RECITALS.
1. On June 10, and continued to July 22, 1998, the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly-noticed Public Headng with respect
to the above-referenced Development Code Amendment and, following the
conclusion thereof, adopted its Resolution No. 98-46, recommending that the City
Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt said amendment.
2. On December t6, 1998, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted and concluded a duly-noticed Public Hearing concerning the subject
amendment to the Development Code~
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.
B. ORDINANCE.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct.
SECTION 2: This City Council hereby finds and determines that the subject
amendment identified in this Ordinance is exempt from the requirements of
the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the
Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of
Chapter 3 of Division 6 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.
SECTION 3: Section 17.02.100 hereby is amended to read, in words and
figures, as follows:
17.02.100 Lapse of Approval and Extensions
A. La~)se of A~)orovals. Approvals for development review, Conditional Use
Permits, Variances, and Minor Deviations Exceptions shall lapse and become
void 24 months five years from the approval date, unless a different expiration
date is specifically established as a condition of approval and unless one of the
following actions occur:
Ordinance 596
Page 2
1. A Building Permit is issued in accordance with the approved entitlement and
construction is commenced and diligently pursued toward completion; or,
2. A Certificate of Occupancy is issued.
£xtcnsions. An extc'nsion may bc gran..tcd by tl'te City Planner for lapse of
approval for projects d¢scrfbod in Subsection A of this section. Extensions
may be granted in 12..month incn;,~ents and not to exceed a total of. f years
from the od.qinal date of approval, unless othervise providc, d for by state
law. All requests for extensions should bc filch' ~vith the City Planner at Icest
30 days pt;or to the expiration date. The City Planner may extend the
approwi oft project if he finds that there have been no significant changes
in the Land Use £1cnlent, Dcvelop,)~ent Cod~, or other applicable
Specific/Con)munity Plan; character of the area within which the project is
located; or cuncnt planning policy or past practice that would cause the
approved project to bec~me inconsistent or non~onforn]in~. Also, granting
of an extension should not be detrimental to the safety or welfare or
materially injurious to propc,~ies or impnsvcments in the vicinity. If the City
Planner finds that there is significant change, the City Planner shall rcfcrtho
extension to the Planning Com,),ission for consideration.
SECTION 4: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word
of this Ordinance is, for any reason, deemed or held to be invalid or
unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, or
preempted by legislative enactment, such decision or legislation shall not
affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City
Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares that it would
have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence,
clause, phrase, or word thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more
sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or words might
subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional or preempted by
subsequent legislation.
SECTION 5: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance
and shall cause the same to be published within 15 days after its passage
at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin a newspaper of general
circulation published in the City of Ontado, California, and circulated in the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
January 6, 1999
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager
Brad Bullet, City Planner
Rudy Zeledon, Assistant Planner
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 98-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA-
A request to amend the regulations for second dwelling units.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission recommends approval of Development Code Amendment 98-02, through
the adoption of the attached Ordinance.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The subject applicati~)n was initiated by the Planning Division to help cladfy unclear parking
requirements for second dwelling units~, provide additional cdteria to help reenforce single family
residential use as the primary use of a property, and to provide some flexibility for proposed projects
on parcels of one-ha4.a~e or more. After researching various alternatives for the development of
appropriate criteria for second dwelling units and conducting two public hearings at the Planning
Commission, the Planning Commission has recommended the following changes to the
Development Code.
1. Existing Criteria: 'The unit does not exceed 640 square feet."
Proposed Criteria: The unit shall not exceed 640 square feet if the parcel is less
than 20,000 square feet; if greater than 20,000 square feet, the second unit can
exceed 640 square feet but may not be greater than 950 square feet or 30 percent
of the main dwelling unit, if attached. (Unit size is exclusive of enclosed parking
space requirement)
Existinq Criteria: 'q'he unit shall provide parking and access per Chapter 17.12,
except temporary removable units shall provide one off-street parking space."
Proposed Criteria: The unit shall provide parking and access per Chapter 17.12 and
provide one enclosed parking space per bedroom, not to exceed two enclosed
spaces per unit. The enclosed parking space shall not be located in the required
front or side yard setback for the primary unit. Temporary removable units shall
~Second dwelling unit means an attached or detached residential dwelling unit which
provides complete independent living facilities for one or more per. sons, including provisions for
living, sleeping, eating, cooking, and sanitation, on the same lot as the primary residence.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DCA 98-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
January 6, 1999
Page 2
front or side yard setback for the primary unit. Temporary removable units shall
provide one off-street parking space."
3. Proposed Additional Criteria:
Lot Size: A second dwelling unit may be established on a lot or parcel of land having
a minimum of 10,000 square feet.
Height: A second dwelling unit shall be limited to one-stow, shall not exceed 16 feet
in height, and shall not exceed the height of the main dwelling
The Planning Commission held two advertised public hearing on the subject application on June
10, 1998 and October 14, 1998. No written or oral opposition to the Development Code
Amendment was received.
In reviewing Development Code Amendment 98-02, the Planning Commission had some concerns
about increasing the size of second dwelling units from 640 square feet to 1,200 square feet. The
Commission determined that a 640 square foot second dwelling unit was too small and that a 1,200
square foot second dwelling unit was too large. After considerable discussion the Planning
Commission agreed to limit the size of second dwelling units to 950 square feet.
Therefore, the Planning Commission recommends approval of Development Code 98-02 through
the adoption of the attached ordinance.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
The amendment is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of
1970, as amended, pursuant to Section 21080.17.
CORRESPONDENCE
This item has been advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valle,/Daily Bulletin newspaper.
FACTS AND FINDINGS
The facts listed in the Planning Commission Resolution No. 98-75 support the requisite findings in
support of Development Code Amendment 98-02.
City Planner
BB'F'Z:mlg
Attachments:
Exhibit "A" - Planning Commission Staff Report dated October 14, 1998
Exhibit "B" - Planning Commission Minutes dated June 10 and October 14, 1998
Exhibit "C" - Planning Commission Resolution No. 98-75
Ordinance Approving Development Code Amendment 98-02
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAL..oNGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
October 14, 1998
Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
Brad BulleL City Planner
Rudy Zeledon, Assistant Planner
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 98-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA-
A request to amend the regulations for second dwelling units for consistency with
changes in State law. (Continued from September 23, 1998.)
BACKGROUND: The Development Code Amendment request was originally reviewed by the
Planning Commission at their meeting on June 10, 1998. At that meeting, the Commission raised
several issues with regards to the proposed changes and directed staff to research the issues and
address them. Staff has reviewed various alternatives for the development of appropriate criteria
for second dwelling units. Attached are the previous staff report and minutes.
ANALYSIS:
Planning Commission Concerns: In reviewing the proposed code amendment, the
Commission questioned the appropriateness of almost doubling the unit size for second
dwelling units~ from 640 to 1,200 square feet and having two units on a single family lot. The
Commission requested information on the zoning for second dwelling units, the number and
location of past approvals, and consideration of additional development criteria. Second
dwelling units are conditionally permitted in Very Low, Low, and Low-Medium Residential
Districts. Since 1993, the City has approved five Conditional Use Permits for second dwelling
units (see Exhibit "D"), Four out of five of the approved second dwelling units are located in
the Very Low Residential District and range in size from 813 square feet to 1,200 square feet
State law:. In 1982, a State law was enacted to encourage local governments to provide for
second units in response to the need for affordable housing and to prevent local governments
from precluding second units. In response to the new state legislation, the City adopted
Ordinance No. 204, in June of 1983, which allowed second dwelling units in single family
residential zones. In August of this year, the City Attorney informed staff that the State law,
~ Second dwelling unit means an attached or a detached residential dwelling unit which provides
complete independent living facilities for one or more persons, including provisions for living, sleeping,
eating, cooking, and sanitation, on the same lot as the primary residence.
PLANNING COMMISSION ,~ FF REPORT
DCA 98-02 - CITY OF RANCHO COCAMONGA
October 14, 1998
Page 2
which allows a maximum of 1,200 square feet for a detached dwelling unit or not to exceed
30 percent of the main dwelling if attached, only applies to cities that had adopted a second
dwelling unit ordinance after July 1, 1983. Since the City adopted its ordinance prior to
July 1, 1983, it is exempt from conforming to the above state regulation and is allowed to
establish minimum (not less then 150 square feet) and maximum unit size requirements for
both attached and detached second dwelling units a's well as establishing additional criteria
to regulate these units.
Reasons for Development Code Amendment 98-02: The requested amendment to second
dwelling units will help clarify unclear parking requirements, provide additional criteria to help
reenforce single family residential use as the primary use of a property, and provide some
flexibility for proposed projects on parcels of one-half acre or more. Staff has reviewed and
researched various options for second dwelling units and feels that the proposed changes
adequately address the Planning Commission's concerns. Therefore, staff recommends the
following changes to the Development Code:
1. Existina Criteria: "The unit does not exceed 640 square feet."
Proposed Criteria: The unit shall not exceed 640 square feet if the parcel is less than
one-half acre; if greater than one-half acre, the second unit can exceed 640 square feet
but may not be greater than 1,200 square feet or 30 percent of the main dwelling unit,
if attached. (Unit size is exclusive of enclosed parking space requirement.)
Existing3 Criteria: 'q'he unit shall provide parking and access per Chapter 17.12, except
temporary removable units shall provide one off-street parking space."
Proposed Criteria: The unit shall provide parking and access per Chapter 17.12 and
provide one enclosed parking space per bedroom, not to exceed two enclosed spaces
per unit. The enclosed parking space shall not be located in the required front or side
yard setback for the primary unit.
3. Proposed Additional Criteria:
Lot Size: A second dwelling unit may be established on a lot or parcel of land having a
minimum of 10,000 square feet.
Height:. A second dwelling unit shall be limited to one story, shall not exceed 16 feet in
height, and shall not exceed the height of the main dwelling unit.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: The amendment is exempt from the requirements of the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, pursuant to Section 21080.17.
CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily
Bulletin newspaper.
PLANNING COMMISSION ,r FF REPORT
DCA 98-02 - CITY OF RANCr~O CUCAMONGA
October 14, 1998
Page 3
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached
Resolution Recommending Approval to the City Council.
Respectfully submitted,
Brad Buller
City Planner
BB:RZ/jfs
Attachments:
Exhibit "A" - Staff Report and Minutes dated June 10, 1998
Exhibit "B" - California Government Code, Section 65852.2
Exhibit"C" - Existing and Proposed changes to Development Code Section
17.08.030. E.6
Exhibit "D" - Map of approved second dwelling units from 1993 to 1998.
Exhibit "E" - Survey of second dwelling unit ordinances by community rs. Rancho
Cucamonga
Resolution Recommending Approval
CITY OF R~&',,'CHO CUCAN[ONGA --
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
June 10, 1998
Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
Brad Bullerl City Planner
Rudy Zeledon, Planning Technician
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 98-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -
A request to amend the regulations for second dwelling units for consistency with
changes in State law.
ABSTRACT: The Development Code regulates second dwelling units'. This amendment is
necessary because of changes in State law to encourage this form of housing for family members,
students, the elderly, in-home health care providers, and the disabled.
ANALYSIS: Currently, the Development Code requires that second dwelling units shall not exceed
640. square feet. State law now allows a maximum of 1,200 square feet for a detached dwelling
unit or not to exceed 30% of the main dwelling if attached. State law also mandates that the City
cannot require parking for second dwelling units exceeding 1 parking space per unit or bedroom.
Our Development Code has been interpreted to require 2 parking spaces within a garage. Staff
recommends the following changes to the Development Code, in order to be in compliance w~th
state law and to help clarify inconsistencies:
1. Existincl Criteria: "The unit does not exceed 640 square feet"
Proposed Criteria:
The total floor area shall not exceed 1,200 square feet for a
detached unit or 30 percent of the main dwelling for an attached
unit,
Existing Criteria:
"The unit shall provide parking and access per Chapter 17.12,
except temporary removable units shall provide 1 off-street parking
space"
Proposed Criteria:
The unit shall provide access per Chapter 17.12 and 1 enclosed
parking space per bedroom, not to exceed 2 enclosed parking
spaces per unit. Temporary removable units shall provide one
off-street parking space.
Second dwelling umts means an attached or a detached residential dwelling unit which prowdes
cor'n01ete independent living facilities for one or more persons, including prowsions for living,
sleeping, eating. cooking, and sanitation, on [he same lot as ~he 0r~mary residence.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DCA 98-02- CITY OFRANCHO CUCAMONGA
June 10,1998
Page 2
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: The amendments are exempt from the requirements of the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, pursuant to Section 21080.17.
CORRESPONDENCE: The item has been advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily
Bulletin newspaper.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached
Resolution recommending approval to the City Council.
Respectfully submitted.
Brad Bu~
City Planner
BB:RZ:mlg
Attachments:
Exhibit "A" - Existing and Proposed changes to Development Code Section
17.08.030 (E.6.d and 0.
Exhibit "B" California Government Code, Section 65852.2
Resolution Recommending Approval
Ordinance
TBE PLANNIING AND ZONING LAW
Establishment of
z~ning di~t~ict~
Uniform~
"Granny" housing
Local second unit
ordinances
Standard~ to
evaluate proposed
second residential
units
or safety. This pmMbition shall be applicable to charter cities since the pmmodoo of the use of no~fossil fuei sources
of energy. such as solar energy and energy conservation measures, is a n~-,',' of statewide conezra.
This section shall not apply to ordinances wMch impose reasonable tea~ctions on solar enea~y systems. However,
it is the policy of the state to promote and encourage the use of solar energy systems and to remove obstacles thereto.
Accordingly, reasonable restrictions on a solar energy system ate those restrictions which do not significantly
the cost of the system or significantly decrease its efficiency, or wMch allow for an alternative system of comparable cost
and efficiency.
For the purposes of this section. "solar energy system" shall have the same meaning as set forth in Section 801.5 of
the Civil Code.
(Added by $tat~. 1978. Ch. 1154.)
65851. For such purposes the legislative body may divide a county. a city. or portions rhea'col. into zones of the number.
shape and area it deems beat suited to catW out the purpose of..this chaptat.
(Added by $tat~. 19~$, Ch. 1880J
65852. All such regulations shall be uniform for each cla~ or l~nd of building or m of land throughout each zone, but the
regulation in one type of zone may differ from those in other types of zones.
(Repealed and added by $tat~. 1965. Ch, 1880.)
6585~1. Notwithstancting Section 65906. any city, including a charter city. county, or city and county may issue a zoning
variance, spe~:ial use permit, or conditional use permit for a dwelling unit to be constoa ted, or which is attached to or
detached from. a primary residenc~ on a parcel zoned for a single-family residenc~ if the dwelling unit is intanded for
the sole occupancy of one adult or two adult peasons who ate 62 years of age or over, and the area of floor space of the
attached d welling unit does not exceed 30 percent of the existing Living area or the area of the floo~ space of the detached
dwelling unit does not exceed 1,200 squa~ feet.
This section shall not be construed to Limit the requirements of Section 63852.2. or the pow~' of local governments
to permit second units.
(Amended by $tat~. 1982, Ch. 1440: Amendtd by great. 1990. Ch. 1150.)
65852.150. The L~gislatttte finds and declares that second units ate a valuable form of hou.~ng in California. Second units
provide housing for family members. students. the elderly, in-home heals cat= provide~ the disabled. and othe:~. at
below market prices within existing neighborhoods. Homeowners who create ___u'eond_ units benefit from added income.
and an increased sen~ of security.
It is the intent of the Legislature that any second-u,.fit on:Linanc~ adopted by local agencies have the effect of providing
for the creation of second units and that provisions in ~ ordinances relating to rnatlm~ incJuding unit size, paddng.
fees and other requiremunts, ate not so arbitrary. e.x~?_'ve, or burdensome so as to utm:amaably rostrict tha abiLity of
homeowners to et,-~-; second units in zones in which they ate authorized by local o~Linance.
(Added by $tau. I994. CA. 580.)
65852.2. (a) Any local agency may. by ordinance. provide for the creation of secoad units in single,- family and multifamily
residential zones. The ordinance:
(I) May designate at~as within the jurisdiction of the locaJ agency where ___~'eoed_ units may be permitted. The
d~ignation o f areas may be based on criteria. which may include. but ate not Limited to. the adequacy of water and sewex
servic~ and the impact of second unit~ on traffic flow.
(2) May impose standar~ on second units which include, but ate not limited to. pati~ing. heig~ setback. lot coverage.
an:hitectural review. and maximum size of a unit.
(3) May provide that___~,cc, nd_ units do not ex__,-eed__ the allowable density for the lot upon which the second unit is located.
and that sncond units ate a residential use tha~ is consistent with the existing gnmeral plan and zoning designration for the
[oL
(4) May establish a proc__~_~ for the issuance of a conditional use permit for ~cond unila.
(5) Shall not be considen:d in the applicafi.o~ of any local ordinance. policy. or program to limit ~ideatial ~rowth.
(b) ( i ) When a Iooai agency which h~ not adopted an o~Linance goveming__~x'o__nd units in acca:a'deace wi~ $uixlivision
(a) or (c). receives its tint application on or after July I, 1983. for a conditional use permit i:ntrmant to thi~ sulxlivision.
the local agency shall ac, cep~ the application and approve or disapprove the application purerant to ~ sub~ vision unless
it adopts an ordinance in accordance with subdivision (a) or (c) within 120 day,s aP, m' nw, eiving the application.
Notwithstanding Section 6590 !. every local agesoy shall grant a special use or a conditional use permit for the creation
of a second unit if the second 1,ulit complies with all of the following:
(A) The unit is not intended for sale and may be rental.
(B1 The lot is zoned foe single-family or multifamily use.
(C~ The lot contains an existing single-family dwelling.
(D) The second umt is either attached to the existing dwellin g and located within the living area of the eaisti .nlzdwelling
or detached from the existing dwelling and Ioca_~_ed on the same lot as the r. xiating dwelling.
(E) The increased floor axes of an attached second unit shall not exce,_,~l___ 30 peathint of the existing living area.
(F') The total area of floor space for a detached second unit shall not e;e~,,~__ 1.200 seSm~ feet.
(G) Requiremenu relating to height, se~ack. lot coverage. architectural nview, site plan review, fcea. charges, and
other zoning requirements generally applicable to rmidential construction in the zone in which t~ property is 1ocauM.
(H) Local building code requirements which apply to detached dwellings. as appropriate,
64 ' 1996 Planning, Zoning, and Development Laws
~ PLA~NNING AND ZONI1NG LAW
(!) Approval by the local health ofHcer wher~ a private sewage disposal system is being used, if required.
(2) No other local ordinance, policy. or regulation shall be the basis for the denial ofa tnfilding permit or a use permit
under this su/:n:tivision.
(3) This subdivision establishes the maximum standards that local agencies shall use to evaluate proposed second units
on lots zoned for residential use which contain an existing single-family dwelling. No additional sm~hrds. other than
those provided in this subdivision or subdivision (a). shall bc utilized or imposoL except that a foes/agency may require
an applicant for a permit issued pursuant to this subdivision to be an owner-occupant.
(4) No changes in zoning ordinances or other ordinances or any changes in the geuerai plan shall be required to
implement this subdivision. Any local agency may amend its zoning ordinance or general plan to incorporate the policies.
procedures, or other provisions applicable to the creation of second units if these provisions m consigent with the
limitations of this subdivision.
(5) A second unit which conforms to the requirements of th/s suixlivisio/~ shall not be considered to exceed the
allowable density for the lot upon which it is located. and shall be deewed to be a residential use which ia consistent with
the existing general plan and zoning designations for the lot. The _s..o~l units shall not be consichazd in the application
of any local ordinance. policy. or program to limit residential growth.
(c) No local agency shall adopt an ordinance which tinally prez:iudes second units within single-family and multifamily
zoned areas unless the ordinance contains findings acknowledging that ~ o~linanc~ may limit housing opportmx/ties
of the region and further contains findings that specific adverse impacts on t~ public health. safety. and welfare chat
would result from allowing second units within single-family and multifamily zoned areas justify adopting the ordinance.
(d) A local agency may establish minimum and maximum unit ~ requirements for ~..n~'~d and detached
units. No minimum siz~ for a second unit. or sizo based upon a ~ of th~ existing dwelling. shall be established
by ordinance for either attached or detached dwellings which does not permit at least an efficiency unit to be constructed
in compliance with local development standards.
(e) Parking requirements for second units shall not exceed one parking space per unit or per beztmorm Additional
parking may be required provided that a finding is made that the additional parking requirements are directly tel-..'.4 to
the use of the second unit and ar~ consistent with e. zisting neighborhood standers applir.~ble to ~g dwellings. Off-
street parking shall be permitted in setl ack areas in locations detesmimgl by tho local agraroy or tAmugh tsndem parking.
unless specific findings a~ made that parking in setlmck area or tanchan ~ is not feasible based upon specific site
or regional topographical or fire and life safety conditions. or that it is not permitted anywher~ else in the jurisdiction.
(t') Fees charged for the construction of second units shall be determinnd in agz:ordamm with Cbalxer $ (comme. ncing
with Section 66000).
fg) This section does not limit the authority of local agencies to adopt less restrictive requirennents for the ~'e. afion of
second units.
(h) Local agencies shall submit a copy of the ordinances adopted pursuant to subdivision (a) or (c) to the Department
of Housing and Community Development within 60 days after adoption. (i) As used in this section. the following terms mean:
(1) "Living area." means the interior habitable area of a dwelling unit including basements and attics but does not
include a garage or any accessory structure.
(2) "Local agency" means a city. county. or city aml county. whether gm~ral law or chartered.
(3) For purposes of this section. "neighberhond" has the same nmaning as set forth in Section 65589.5.
(4) "Second unit" means an attach~ or a detached residential dwelling unit which provides comple~ independent
living facilities for one or mor~ peWOhS. it shall include permanent pmvis/om for living. slnel~ng. eating. cooking. and
sanitation on the same patrol as the single-family dwelling is sit--....4 A second unit atso inclodes the following: (A) An efficiency unit. as defined in Section 17958. ! of Health and Safety Code.
(B) A manufactured home.. as defined in Section 18007 of the Health and Safety Code.
Note: Stats. 1986. C!g !~6. also marls:
SEC. 2. This act M~MI ___h..eom~_ operative April 1. 1987.
(A dried by $tms. 198'2. CK 1440. £.0"ecr~e ./,/y 1. 19~$: .4 mended by Stats. 1996. C~. 1 $6: Am~.nd~d by $ua~ i 990.
Ch. 1150: Amend~ by Smt. z 199~. C~.
Note: Stats. 1982. Ch. 1440. also reads:
SEC. 1. (a) The Legislature finds and declares that there is a tmmenclous unmet need {'or new housing to shelter
Califomia's population. The unmet housing needs will be further aggravated by the severe curbs-rs in federal housing
programs.
(b) The Legislature finds and declares that Call fornia's existing housing resoorces are vastly underufi lized due in large
pan to the changes in social patterns. The improved ut.qization of this stete's existing housing msourr. es offers an
innovative and cost-effective solution to Califoroia's housing crisis.
(c) The Legislature finds and declares that the state has a role in increasing the utilization of C. alifornia's ho~sing
resources and in reducing the barriers to the provision of afford~l¢ housing.
(d) 'i'he Legislature finds and declares that there are many I~.'nefits associated with the creation of second-family
residential units on existing single-family lots. which include:
( 1 ) Providing a cost-effective means of serving development through the use?existing infr&m~:mres. as contrasted
to requiring the construction of new costly infrastructures to serve development in undeveiopexi aress.
Necess~.ry fm~ for
prohibiting second
Definitions
Uncodifled policy
1996 Planning, Zoning. and Development Laws * 65
Rancho Cucamonga Development Code ' Section 17. 08. 030
The Design Review Committee shall determine if the placement of the mobile home
is compatible to the immediate area in which it is being placed in accordance with
Section 17.06.010 and the following criteria:
(1)
The design of the mobile home unit shall be similar in character and
appearance to other dwellings in the area for such things as unit size, roof
overhangs, roof materials and e>~terior materials.
(2) All building setbacks, parking, coverage, height, width and sign requirements
of the base District shall apply.
Recreational Vehicle Storaqe Yard. The parking and storage of recreational vehicles in
proximity to residential users shall be permitted only on lots of 2 acres or more unless part
of a master planned development, subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit.
All storage activities shall be screened from public view by a combination of block
or masonry wall, barming, dense landscaping, or building mass.
Retail or wholesale activity, Commercial dismantling, repair or storage wrecking
activities or the storage of junk or salvage materials or dismantled parts are
prohibited.
Second Dwellin(3 Units. Permitted subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit and the
following criteria:
The unit may be constructed as an accessory building or attached to the primary
residence on a parcel in a single family residential district.
The unit is not for sale, but for rental purposes only, or use by a member of the
immediate family.
The lot contains an existing single family detached residence, and does not contain
a guest house.
Thc unit decs net ¢xe~eel 640 S~luorc feet. The unit shall not exceed 640 square
feet if the parcel is less than one-half acre; if greater than one-half acre, the
second unit can exceed 640 square feet but may not be greater than 1,200
square feet or 30 percent of the main dwelling unit, if attached. (Unit size is
exclusive of enclosed parking space requirement)
Lot size: A second dwelling unit may be established on a lot or parcel of !and
having a minimum of 10,000 square feet.
Height: A second dwelling unit shall be limited to one story, shall not exceed
16 feet in height, and shall not exceed the height of the main dwelling unit.
e. The unit shall have a separate entrance from the main residence.
!,t~ s/
17.08-8 3/96
Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17. 08. 030
Thc unit 3hell providc perking and acccas pcr Chaptcr 17.12, cxocpt tcmporary
rc~noveblc unite shall providc eric off 3troct perking spncc. The unit shall provide
parking and access per Chapter 17.12 and provide one enclosed parking
space per bedroom, not to exceed two enclosed spaces per unit. The enclosed
parking space shall not be located in the required front or side yard setback
for the primary unit. Temporary removable units shaft provide one off. street
parking space.
The unit construction shall conform to the site development criteria applicable to
accessory buildings or additions to main residence in the base district in which
the unit is located
The use of temporary/removable structures for a second dwelling unit shall be limited
to the sole occupancy of one or two adult persons who are 60 years of age or over
and related to the occupants of primary residence by blood, marriage, or adoption.
Further, said structure shall be restricted to the area at the rear of the primary
residence and adequately screened from public view from the street.
The unit may require design review, pursuant to Section 17.06.010-E, as determined
by the City Planner.
The applicant shall submit to the Building and Safety Division written certification from
the affected water and sewer district that adequate water and sewer facilities are or
will be available to serve the proposed unit. For units using septic facilities allowable
by the Santa Aria Regional Quality Control Board and the City, written certification
of acceptability including all supportive information shall be submitted.
Uses Within Recoqnized Historical Structures. Existing historical landmarks and focal
points which have been recognized by the City as having historical significance are
encouraged to be enhanced through physical improvements. Historical structures within
a residential district may be used for uses other than residential based upon the following
criteria:
a. A conditional use permit shall be approved by the Planning Commission.
Any use proposed shall not cause intensification or disruption to any adjacent uses
or neighborhood.
C4
The uses shall be limited to small scale uses such as, but not limited to, boarding
house, bed and breakfast inn, minor offices, boutique, antique shop, book store, or
fiodsL
do
The site and structure shall be fully improved to include such things as, but not
limited to, landscaping, parking, new exterior building materials (roofing, siding,
painting), walls or fences, street improvements, drainage facilities, etc.
Telecommutinq Centers. Single-family development of 500 or more units shall provide a
telecommuting center or contribute toward the development of one in an amount
satisfactory to the City Council.
17,08-9 3/96
Approved Second Dwelling Units From 1993-1998
1.. CUP
2. CUP
3. CUP
4. CUP
5. CUP
95-04 8455 Hillside (VL)
93-44 8761 Sierra Madre (L) ,
96-16 5653 Beryl (VL)
96-33 9748 Cottonwood Way (VL)
97-26 5515 Amethyst (VL)
Second Dwelline Units Conditionally Permitted in the Following Districts:
Very Low Residential (Min. lot size 20,000 sq. ft.)
Low Residential (Min. lot s/ze 7,200 sq. ft.)
Low Medium Residential (Min. lot size 5,000 sq. ft.)
City Limits
......... Unicorporated Area Within City
F..xf6 i-f "b"
Sphere of Influence
SURVEY OF SECOND -WELLING UNIT ORDINANCE' :::3YCOMMUNITY
10.
CLAREMONT UPLAND
x X
SECOND UNIT CRITERIA
Conditional Use Permit Req'd
Temporary Use Permit Req'd.
Second unit can be at&ached or
detached.
Limit to rental only or use by
immediate family member.
Oesign continuity with existing
home.
Prohibits the division of property.
Must meet building, fire, setback,
and service requirements.
Minimum lot coverage.
Minimum Joi~ size of 10,000 square
feet for second dwelf/ng unit.
Limit unit to certian residential
districts.
Umit beige,! of unit under 16 feet.
I LA VERNE RC
x x
X X X
X ', X
X
X
X
X
11, X
X
X X X
X X X
X
X X X X
~r
12. Limit height per zoning district.
13. I.Jmits unit to one story. X
14. Minimum distance required between
second unit and main dwelling.
15. Property owner must live in main X
unit at time of CUP approval.
16. Limit size of second unit. X
17. Limit second unit size to 640
square feet or under 600 square
feet.
18. Second unit can exceed 640 square X
feet.
1 g. Subiect to driveway/parking req'd. X
20. One on-site parking required. X
21, Enclosed parking space req'd. X
22. Minimum of one covered parking X
space.
22. No additional driveway approaches X
from public streets.
23. Separate entrance from may unit
required
24. Second unit may be cons[ructed
over existing garage.
25. Seo:md unit may not be constructed X
over exisffr~g garage.
· 15 feet in required rear yard only. 35 feet outside requLred yard.
[Proposed criteria adoption.
X
X
X
X
X
X X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
PUBLIC
Chairman Barker observed t,~at ' ~ reques~.ed the '*¢ be continued to July '~'~ 1998. H~ continued
the item to July 22, 1998
C. DI=VF::LOPMFNT CODF AMICNOMI::NT 98-02 - CI.TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -A request
to amend the regulations for second dwelling units for consistency with changes in state law.
Rudy Zeledon, Planning Technician, presented the staff report.
Chairman Barker observed that the staff report indicated the changes were I~eing requested in order
to bring the Cit'y's ordinance into compliance with state law. He asked if the changes are mandated
by state law.
Mr. Zeledon replied they are; however the second dwelling unit must ~lso meet setback
requirements.
Commissioner McNiel suggested continuing the matter to allow a review of the setbacks and
possible incorporation of further restrictions. He felt that a 1,200 square foot dwelling is another
house and not what was originally envisioned as a granny flat.
Brad Bullet, City Planner, stated City staff has been operating under the state law and recenIly
approved some structures meeting the new state standards. He suggested staff indicate where
projects have been approved and built.
Chairman Barker asked that staff also indicate where such second dwelling units could be built. He
objected to the state's telling the City it will have smaller lots. :
Mr. Bullet said the City has a choice as to where second dwelling units are permitted.
Chairman Barker observed that the state is in effect changing 1/2 acre zoning into 1/4 acre zoning.
Mr. Bullet reported that second dwelling units are appearing on the 1/2 acre lots because smaller
lots are too small to allow the second unit to meet the required setbacks.
Commissioner Bethel asked if the City can specify what lots.can have second dwelling units.
Chairman Barker stated the City zoned for larger lots in some areas. He observed that local
governments often roll over because someone else has made a decision and he resents such
decisions being forced on the City. He noted that El Monte now has two and three houses on what
used to be single lots.
Motion: Moved by McNiel, seconded by Bethel, to continue development Code Amendment 98-02
tO .July 27, 1998. Motion carried by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
BARKER, BETHEL, MCNIEL
NONE
MACIAS, TOLSTOY
- carried
Planning Commission Minutes
-2-
June 10, 1998
¢/
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
Regular Meeting
October 14, 1998
Chairman McNiel called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cuc~ a Planning
Commission to order at 7:00 p.m. The meeting was he, ld in the Council at Rancho
Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Ddve, Rancho Cucamon¢ ;alifornia. Chairman
McNiel then led in the pledge of allegiance.
ROLL CALL
COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT: Rich Macias, John M~
Peter Tolstoy
Larry McNiel, Pain Stewart,
ABSENT: None
STAFF PRESENT:
Brad Bullet, City Plan
Deputy City Attorn
Engineer; Brer
Commission
Dan Coleman, Principal Planner; Michael Estrada,
Fong, Senior Planner;, Dan James, Senior Civil
Count, Associate Planner;, Gall Sanchez, Planning
¥; Rudy Zeledon, Assistant Planner
ANNOUNCEMENTS
Presentation of Pf
~tion to E. David Barker
Chairman M(
Barker.
presented a proclamation to former Planning Commission Chairman E. David
Mr.B
Co
)mmented that he had faith in the Commissioners he had worked with and wished the
good luck.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 98-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request
to amend the regulations for second dwelling units for consistency with changes in State law.
(Continued from September 23, 1998)
Rudy Zeledon, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report and suggested clarification in the
language to restrict the size of the second unit to 640 square feet if the parcel is less than 20,000
square feet.
Chairman McNiet opened the public hearing, There were no comments and he closed the
hearing. He asked for clarification that the City is not subject to state law as written with respect
to square footage because the City's ordinance was in place prior to July 1, 1983.
Michael Estrada, Deputy City Attorney, confirmed that was correct.
Chairman McNiel stated he would rather start small and ease up toward the 1,200 square feet.
H'e suggested 900 square feet and thought it would logically restrict opportunities to build the units
specificaily for rentals.
Commissioner Mannedno agreed that 1,200 square feet may be larger than necessary. He
suggested 1,000 square feet.
Chairman McNiel suggested compromising at 950 square feet.
Motion: Moved by Mannerino, seconded by Tolstoy, .to adopt the resolution recommending
approval of Development Code Amendment 98-02 with modification to limit the second dwelling
unit to a maximum of 950 square feet. Motion carried by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
MACIAS, MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY
NONE
NONE - carried
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 97-4.~ MASI
COMMERCE PARTNERS - The development of three auto service buildings 20,400
square feet on 2.23 acres of land within the Masi Plaza in the Industrial Park Di (Subarea
7) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located at the southwest side Drive and
Sebastian Way -APN: 229-011-56 through 60. (Continued from Sep 23,, 1998)
C. ommissioner Mannerino recused himself from the discussion
dealings.
of previous business
Nancy Fong, Senior Planner, presented the staff report.
Chairman McNiel observed that Building 22 backs up t(
would be located between the back of the building a
existing block wall. He asked what
wall.
Ms. Fong replied that it is about 10 feet wide an
indicated the area is on a 2:1 slope.
~re is water drainage and a return wall. She
Chairman McNiel asked if the Fire Oepa
wall.
had accepted the absence of man doors along that
Ms. Fong replied it is acceptabh ;he said the area will be landscaped.
Chairman McNiel opened )ublic hearing.
Michael Scandiffio, M~ Commerce Partners, 11871 Foothill Boulevard, Rancho Cucamonga,
agreed with the staff ~ort. He showed one of the plaques to be installed along Vintner's Walk.
Hearing no furth~ testimony, Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing.
Commission y noted that the City has suggested that automotive related businesses be
gathered a center rater than having individual businesses along Foothill Boulevard. He Celt
this app ion falls into that category and was pleased it is not on a major street. He indicated
Planning Commission Minutes
-3-
October 14, 1998
RESOLUTION NO. 98-75
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL
OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT NO. 98-02, AMENDING
SECTION 17.08.030, PERTAINING TO SECOND DWELLING UNIT
REGULATIONS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF.
A. Recitals.
1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for Development Code
Amendment No. 98-02, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution,
the subject Development Code Amendment is referred to as "the application,"
2. On June 10, and continued to July 8, August 12, September 9, September 23, and
October 14, 1998, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly
noticed public headrig on the application and concluded said hearing on the latter date.
3. All legal prerequisites pdor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony,
this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The amendment is warranted in order to be in compliance with State law.
b. The proposed amendment will not have a significant impact on the environment.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2
above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. That the proposed amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the
General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the
General Plan and with related development; and
b. That the proposed amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the
Development Code; and
c. That the proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety,
or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and
d. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the City's General Plan.
4. This Commission hereby finds that the proposed amendment has been prepared and
reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
DCA 98-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
October 14, 1998
Page 2
the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, and further, specifically finds that based upon substantial
evidence, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed amendment
will have a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed amendment is
exempt pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Section 21080.17.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set'forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby recommends approval of Development Code Amendment 98-02 as
shown in the Ordinance attached hereto.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER 1998.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cqcamonga, do .
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and
adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of
the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of October 1998, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE
AMENDMENT NO. 98-02, AMENDING SECTION 17.08.030 PERTAINING
TO SECOND DWELLING UNIT REGULATIONS, AND MAKING FINDINGS
IN SUPPORT THEREOF.
A. Recitals.
1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for Development Code
Amendment No. 98-02, as described in the title of this Ordinance. Hereinafter in this Ordinance,
the subject Development Code Amendment is referred to as "the application."
2. On June 10, and continued to July 8, August 12, September 9, September 23, and
October 14, 1998, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly
noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on the latter date.
3. On · , the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly
noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date.
4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.
B. Ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and ordained by the City Council of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part
A, of this Ordinance are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council dudng the above-
referenced public headrig on , including written and oral staff reports, together with public
testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The proposed amendment is warranted in order to be in compliance with State
law.
Code.
b. The proposed amendment will not have a significant impact on the environment.
c, The proposed amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Development
d. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-
referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2
above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. The proposed amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the
General Plan and will provide for development in a manner consistent with the General Plan and
related development; and
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
DCA 98-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Page 2
b. The proposed amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the
Development Code; and
c. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and
d. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan.
4. This Council hereby finds that the proposed amendment has been prepared and
reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and
the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, and further, specifically finds that based upon substantial
evidence, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed amendment
will have a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed amendment is
exempt pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Section 21080.17.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Council hereby approves Development Code Amendment No. 98-02, amending Section
17.08.030.E.6.d. & f. to read as follows:
'°d.
Thc u¢,it docs not cxceed 6~10 square fcct. The unit shall not
exceed 640 square feet if the parcel is less than 20,000 square
feet; if greater than 20,000 square feet, the second unit can
exceed 640 square feet but may not be greater than 950 square
feet or 30 percent of the main dwelling unit, if attached. (Unit size
is exclusive of enclosed parking space requirement)
Lot size: A second dwelling unit may be established on a lot or
parcel of land having a minimum of 10,000 square feet.
Height: A detached second dwelling unit shall be limited to one
story, shall not exceed 16 feet in height, and shall not exceed the
height of the main dwelling uni~:
Th= unit shall prorid= parking end access per Cha¢¢r 17.12, ¢xc~pt
tc~i~or8;'/~,tovabl~ units 3hall provide onc off strcct parkk'~g s~occ.
The unit shall provide parking and access per Chapter 17.12 and
provide one enclosed parking space per bedroom, not to exceed
two enclosed spaces per unit. The enclosed parking space shall
not be located in the required front or side yard setback for the
primary unit. Temporary removable units shall provide one off-
street parking space."
6. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Ordinance is, for
any reason. deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of
competent jurisdiction, or preempted by legislative enactment, such decision or legislation shall
not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section,
subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more
sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or words might subsequently be declared
invalid or unconstitutional or preempted by subsequent legislation.
??
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
DCA 98-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Page 3
7. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same
to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin
a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
January 6, 1999
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, A.I.C.P., City Manager "
Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director
Dave Moore, Recreation Superintendent
CONSIDERATION AND DISCUSSION OF THE PARK AND RECREATION
COMMISSION'S RECOMMENDATION RELATING TO PARKING AT
WEST BERYL PARK
RECOMMENDATIONS:
The Park and Recreation Commission does not recommend any further actions at this time beyond
the previously approved traffic signal concerning parking at West Beryl Park.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
The Route 30 Ad Hoc Task Force had expressed concerns that traffic on Carnelian Street may
increase due to the installation of the Route 30 on-ramp/off-ramp and impact pedestrian traffic
crossing Carnelian Street to and from West Beryl Park activities. They also expressed concerns that
currently pedestrians were risking their safety by crossing Carnelian Street to and from West Beryl
Park activities. Usually this occurs on Saturdays and sometimes on week nights during A.Y.S.O.
games. It is a common occurrence for participants and their families to park on Highland Street
(west of Carnelian Street) when the West Beryl Park parking lot has filled to capacity. Once parked
on Highland Street they must then cross Carnelian Street where there is currently no cross walk or
traffic signal. A new traffic signal has been approved for this location and it will be installed prior
to July 1, 1999.
Originally, the Park and Recreation Commission approved a recommendation to the City Council
intended to reduce parking conflicts at West Beryl Park and prevent the need to cross Carnelian
Street until a traffic signal was to be installed. The recommendation was to require A.Y.S.O. to
repro gram their games thirty minutes apart to allow teams to leave prior to arrival of the next set of
teams. Following the Commission's discussion, additional concerns were brought to staff's attention
by residents and members of the Route 30 Task Force.
Concerns expressed addressed the fact that pedestrians were still crossing at Carnelian Street to
attend the soccer games at West Beryl Park. Following further review by staff, it was found that
A.Y.S.O. was complying with the Commission's recommendation to schedule their games thirty
minutes apart to help alleviate the parking problems. It appears, however, that the players and
coaches were taking advantage of the thirty minute gaps by arriving even earlier for warmups.
City Council
West Beryl Parking
January 6, 1999
Page 2
Staff feels that further extending the gap between the games would not resolve the parking problem.
On Tuesday, October 13, 1998, the Route 30 Ad Hoc Task Force met and discussed the issue of
additional parking at West Beryl Park. The City Engineering staff presented the following options
for consideration:
Construct an additional parking lot containing forty parking spaces within the park
north of the existing parking lot.
2. Eliminate one of the two existing playing fields from any activities.
3. Utilize the existing jogging trail/service road in the park for vehicular parking.
The Route 30 Task Force recommended approval of Option 1; the construction of an additional lot
containing forty (40) parking spaces within the park north of the existing parking lot. The City's
Engineering Department estimates the cost at approximately $100,000.
On November 19, 1998, the Park and Recreation Commission addressed the issue and reviewed the
recommendation of the Route 30 Task Force, but unanimously recommended that the City not
expand parking at this time until it has been determined whether the traffic signal has resolved
everyone's concerns. The Commission felt that the additional parking lot may bear consideration
in the future if the traffic signal does not alleviate the concern.
The Park and Recreation Commission did review the following concerns regarding expanding
parking at West Beryl Park.
If green space is removed to expand parking, then the neighboring residents will
have a parking lot adjacent to their backyard. This may present some problems for
residents as the current parking lot is used seven days, six nights a week. Traffic
noise and lighting may become a nuisance to the neighbors.
The issue has always been the ability to cross Carnelian safely. If parking is
expanded, there will be no guarantee that pedestrians will still not need to cross
Carnelian Street to access West Beryl Park.
~Kev[~Mc. Ardle
Community Services Director
KM/DM/mv
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
December 28, 1998
JACK I. AM, A.I.C.P., City Manager
City of Rancho Cucamonga
CITY COUNCIL
RODNEY HOOPS, Chief of Police
Rancho Cucamonga Police Department
1977
SUBJECT: VINEYARD JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL DOG-BITE INCIDENT
INCIDENT
On Saturday (October 24, 1998) at approximately 1:00 p.m., a 2-year-old
female juvenile was watching a soccer game at Vineyard Junior High
School (located at 6440 Mayberry Street). The 2-year-old was with her
father and her 8-year-old sister.
While at the school, the 8-year-old befriended a woman who had a dog on
a leash. The 8-year-old female convinced the woman with the dog to
allow her (the 8-year-old) to walk the dog on the leash over to show her 2-
year-old sister. When the 8-year-old showed the dog to the 2-year-old,
the dog growled and bit the 2-year-old in the face. The 2-year-old
received a K-inch laceration on her left cheek, which required three
stitches.
Animal Control responded and removed the dog for further testing. The
father of the injured 2-year-old reported the incident to the Rancho
Cucamonga Police Department approximately eight (8) hours later (7:54
p.m.).
POLICE PROCEDURES
Upon receiving the call, officers responded to the chiid's residence and
followed the correct Sheriffs Department procedure by taking an incident
report. An incident report was taken since there was no criminal intent on
the part of the dog's owner. The dog was on a leash at the time of the
incident, and the victim's sister was actually in control of the dog at the
time of the bite.
/3/
Page Two
December 28, 1998
VINEYARD JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL DOG-BITE INCIDENT
CONTACT WITH REPORTING PARTY
Jay JACOBS m age 34 "
Los Angeles County Deputy Sheriff
Alta Loma, CA
(home phone: 909-941-8669)
Shortly after the incident, Mr. JACOBS called Sergeant Toni NICASSIO to
complain about the lack of a criminal report being taken by the responding
officer. Mr. JACOBS quoted California Vehicle Code Section 21113
[Driving or Parking on Public rounds] as a prosecutable section.
Sergeant NICASSIO contacted Deputy District Attomey Nancy COOPER
to inquire if any criminai/prosecutable offense had been committed.
Sergeant NICASSIO received a verbal confirmation from the District
Attorney's Office, that a criminal offense had not occurred. Lt. Joe
HENRY and I were advised of the original complaint by Mr. JACOBS
We did not hear from Mr. JACOBS until he appeared at the City Council
meeting on December 16, 1998. Immediately after Mr. JACOBS'
comments to the Council, Lt. David LAU and I met with Mr. JACOBS and
his wife in the lobby outside of the Council chambers. We expressed our
concerns over his daughter being bitten, and informed him that we would
re-investigate the incident to determine if any criminal offense had
occurred.
On December 21, 1998, I received a call from Mr. JACOBS. I told him
that we had not found a prosecutable offense, and that we had made
contact with the Superintendent of the Alta Loma School District to review
the verbage on the "posted sign." Mr. JACOBS appeared to accept these
facts and acknowledged that Vehicle Code Section 2113 was not a
prosecutable offense when applied to his daughter's dog-bite incident.
CONTACT WITH ALTA LOMA SCHOOL DISTRICT
The Rancho Cucamonga Police Department is currently working with the
Alta Loma School District Superintendent's Office to review the language
on all posted signs.
Page Three
December 28, 1998
VINEYARD JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL DOG-BITE INCIDENT
CONCLUSION
It is unfortunate that Mr. JACOBS' daughter was bitten by the dog. We
understand his concern as a father to look out for his family's well-being.
We also believe that any further action could possibly be pursued in a civil
action (i.e., home owners' insurance, medical costs, etc.).
With the information we currently have, we do not believe that a criminal
offense occurred. We will continue to review the case and, if additional
facts are present, we will re-submit the case to the District Attorney's
Office for criminal review.
Mr. JACOBS has also indicated to the Council that he will be pursuing the
case in some kind of civil action. We cannot allow the Police Department
to provide support documentation with the '~'use" of being criminal when
the actions are civil in nature.
RH:bms
Div. 11 Div. 11
§21111
d~~, ~ · · · we~
~c for p~ of - ~---.
eff~
,a~'~ ~~ 21113. (~ No ~ --~~~{d8 ~'nim'l, w~ a~
COmmep~nK wl~--,. _ ~ (~~';"l ~-- · __ ,_
~ ( ~'~ _~~~--,...., ~-.-... ~_~..
*
, ~---.- . _____ ~ ~~on o~ ~ i--~
ap~ .q--_ ~e~ ~ ~ . · ·
§21114 --590-- Div. 11
of t12 board, legislative body, or Officer, for ey~mi~tion by all interested
persons, a written ~tatement of all those ~pecial conditions and regadations
adopted under this section.
(c) When any governing board, legislative body, or officer permits public
traffic upon the driveways, paths, paring facilities, or grotto ,c~ under their
control then, except for those conditions imposed or regulatio,~a enacted by
the ~over~in~ board, legislative body, or officer applicable to the traffic, all
the provisions of thl- code relatin~ to traffic upon the highways shall be
applicable to the traffic upon the driveways, paths,' parking facilities, or
(d) With respect to the permitted use of vehicles or znlm.1. on property
under the direct control of the legislative body of a municipality, no change
in the use of vehicles or snlmsl~ on the property, wMch had been permitted
on January 1, 1976, shall be effective unless and until the le~alative body,
at a meetin~ open to the ~eneral public, dote ~rmlnes th_zt the use of vehicles
or A,~im.t- on the property should be prohibited or restdated.
(e) A transit development beard may adopt ordinances. rules, or
re~dations to restrict, or specify the conditions for, the use of bicycles,
motorized bicycles, skateboards, and roller skates on property under the
control of, or any portion of property used by, the board.
(f) A public a~ency, incB,d;,~g, but not limited to, the Re,eats, of the
University of California and the Trustees of the California State University,
may adopt rules or re~tlations to restrict, or specify the conditions for, the
use of bicycles, motorized bicycles, skateboards, and roller skates on public
property under the jurisdi~on of that a~mcy.
(~) 'Housing authority; for the purposes of this section, m~.- a housins
authority located within a county with a population of over six million
people, and any other housing authority that complies with the requirements
of thi= section.
Amended C~ 10~?, Sta~ 1990. F~ective January 1, 199L
z~ -~4,d ~ 6~, ~ ~0~, Start X996. FJ~netiw January X, X99~.
Aircraft on Local Roads
~.].~4. If a local anthority find. ~h,~t & city .treet or county road under
constructed, with the prior approval of the local authority, so as to safely
permit the use thereof by reg.!-- vehicular tr,~ and also the taxiing of
aircraft theroon*betwem the airport and the place where such aircraft are
hangarod or tied down, the local authority may by resolution or ordinance
~e~i~-te such street or road or portion thereof for such combined use and
precribe rules and regulations therefor which ~h.!! have the force of law, No
such street or road ~hn!! be so deeigneted for a distance ofmore
respect ~t,nli. be .conclusive. Upon such dem~mntion becoming eriecure,
.h.n be the solo re~pop-iMl~ty of the local authority to enforce the provisions
of the Velticle Code and all rules and reaulations adopted by it upon such
street or roa~ Upon such r]eeig~-~on becoming effective it ~hnl. I be lawful to
taxi aircraft upon such street or road in accordance with the rules. and
regulations prescribed as aforesaid and said aircraft need not be licensed
under ~hl. code or comply with other proviaiona thereof.
21114.5. Notwi~hntsndlng Section 21663 or any other provision of th~.
code, local authorities may, by ordinance, authorize the operation of electric
. _ _~____.__._. ~:_~ ...... k~..~..~^~u .~f~ v~n,~ ~ or older. or.
Div. 11
on public aidewalks.
requirin; an~ ,~i..,hl~
leas~ an electric cart
stidter, s;,*u b~om~ in'
car~.
This s~tioa does
~ 4~.5.
AmandM C~ 17, 2tat~ I
Goff Certs o~ Local
21115~ Ira local a
located a~acent to, or
course and. the place'
bounded by a real eau
a~o the driv~ of ~
resolution or ofdinanc
combined use and pro
of law. No ~ * s
mile from the g~
or beyond the area
authority in ~ resp
effective it ~B.i~ be la
with the prescri~
sB~l! not require that
The rules and
sirins notice thereof
section. means an e
ownera of occupant~
one or moro golf
or occupancy of a r~
Golf Cart Crossi~
ordinance or reselu'
thno other than dm
which has a po.te~
of approxim~
or resolutiox.
e~foresment agem
enforcement agenc
combination of th~
with reasonable s~
law enforcement a
~Ufort~
~ of
~on.
ion ~h~11
m~Uc~i,
believe,
iopt, and
disabled
Div. 11 ---~77--
DIVISION 11. RUINS OF T]~ ROAD
CHAPTER 1. OBEDIENCE TO AND EFFECT OF TRAFFIC LAWS
Article 1. Definitions
§21000
De~rtment
21000. Wherever in this division 'department' occurs, it means the
'Department of the California Highway Patrol.
of Division . .
21001.
ofvehicles upon the highways, umeM a mrre, rm~,
to.
Article 2. Efr of
Riding or Driving of Animal
Every person ridin~ or drivin~ an animal upon a highway hm~ all
21050. . ' licable to the driver of a
· this division ana uzv~zmz ~v ,.,,,,--- ---~ . .
Am~adM CI~ M6, h~ 1967. ~ffecdve No~emb~ 8. 196.
TmIMy
- -- - ---:-- -~"ons o--1~ to trolley coaches:
21051. 'Inc louowm~ ,~,-,.
(a) Sectiotas 1800, 4000, 4001, 4002, 4008, 4006, 4009, 4150, 4151, 4152,
4153. 4155. 4156, 4158, 4166, 4500 to 4509, inclusive, 4450 t,o 4454_,
· '" ~/",d~V! I/dMX'lt ";a'lrv""t ,,,r-.~,v~, ,,,.*iv. t · . , ,. ·
CD) De_ o~ .... ~ . ,,,,,, ,.).~n .,, 2284- inclumve. relatiag to
~" · 21461 21660, 21t~l, 21uoo, ,
054 21450 to 21457, inclusive, ,
2105~, 21 _,_, .21750, 21758, 21754, 21Y5 ,
21700, 21701, 2170~, 2170~, 21709, 21712.
. to 22453, inclucre, z,~lU?,_.M' ,23110,
223al, 228a2, 22400. ~ 42oo4,
23152, '231158, 40881, 42002 with respect to 10852 and 10853, and
(d) ~.e_.: o~ 26706, 26707, and 26708, relatinf to equipment.
(e) 2-~or,$17301, 17302, 17308, 21461, 35000, 35100, 35101, 35105,
35106, .35111, 35550, 35551, 35750, ~o5751, 35753, 40000.1 to 40000.25,
inclusive, 40001, 40003, and 42031, r~latin~ to ths size, weight, and loadi~
· ~bllo ~ ~d ~mployees - - · o'f v~hicles
21052 provue_ . ' wnue
upon ~high~, ?!P.P~. ~.~ State, any poli 'ttCal m~.vi~.on [- _the~__~ any
vehicle~ ~bject, to t, ne~ exemp,,,,-.,-
vehicles in this code.
q,
,
CITY O[: RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
January 6, 1999
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director
Dave Moore, Recreation Superintendent ,~
CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST BY HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH
TO WAIVE FEES FOR SOAPBOX CLASSIC TO BE HELD MAY 31. 1999,
AT THE EPICENTER SPORTS COMPLEX
RECOMMENDATION'
It is recommended that the City Council review the request for a waiver of facility rental fees and
the closure of Rochester Avenue for Hillside Community Church's Soapbox Classic to be held on
May 31, 1999, at the Epicenter Sports Complex.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
The City has received a request from Hillside Community Church to waive the facility rental fees
and all other associated city fees for their Soapbox Classic to be held on May 31, 1999, at the
Epicenter Sports Complex. Hillside Community Church is also requesting the closure of Rochester
Avenue for the purpose of providing additional race track space.
Normally, City Council has considered waiving only the facility rental fees when an applicant has
requested City co-sponsorship. Applicants have still been responsible for maintenance costs, etc.
In these instances, consideration for waiver of fees means waiver of rental costs. Any waiver of
charges beyond that of rental fees constitutes a subsidy. Those events that have had all fees (facility
rental and maintenance) waived by the City Council have been events such as the Dare Baseball
Clinic, Skate Park Fundraiser, etc., whereas revenues generated have been remitted to the City.
Council may desire to consider the following options:
Waive all fees, e.g. both facility rental fees and associated fees (maintenance
expenses).
Waive only the facility rental fees.
Deny waiving any fees.
/O7
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Hillside Community Church Request
January 6, 1999
Page 2
Staff met with Hillside Community Church representatives to discuss the event. Plans were
submitted to use two softball fields, two soccer fields, Epicenter Complex interior roadways and one
parking lot. Hillside Community Church did request closur~ of Rochester Avenue for the day of the
event; however, Lieutenant Dave Lau of the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department was reluctant
on closing the street for a day; as it may present a hardship to residents and generate complaints.
Closure of Rochester for this duration would also present a significant expense for Police staff for
traffic control not yet considered or required for the event.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The total facility rental and associated [~es to be waived will total $6,031.24. This excludes any
Police Department staff that may be required if Rochester is closed.
Expenses include:
Facility Rental:
Maintenance Expense:
Refundable damage/security deposit:
$1,960.00
$2,071.24
$2,00O.O0
Respectfully submitted,
Kevin McArdle
Community Services Director
KM/DM/mam
citycoun\hillsidereqst