The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2004/07/14 - Agenda PacketJULY 14, 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA INDEX ITEM NO. ITEM TITLE PAGES A ends 2 - 6 A Vacation of Drainage and Trait Easement of Parcel Ma No 15349 7 - 9 B-C Development Review DRC2003-01186 Variance DRC2003-00187 10 - 77 D Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-01160 78 - 105 E, F, G Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16237 Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00504 Variance DRC2004-00522 106 - 210 H Tentative Parcel Ma SUBTPM16482 211 - 229 I Tentative Parcel Ma SUBTPM16841 230 - 242 J-K Environmental Assessment and General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00371 Environmental Assessment and Etiwanda S ecific Plan Amendment DRC2004-00402 243 - 290 L Election of Plannin Commission Officers 291 M Desi n Review Committee A ointments 292 N Trails Adviso Committee A ointment 293 C6un~~ • THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA _ PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA jZANCeo Jul 14 2 C,,UCAMONGA y , 004 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Chairman Macias _ Vice Chairman McNiel Fletcher _ McPhail _ Stewart II. ANNOUNCEMENTS III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES June 9, 2004, Adjourned Meeting June 15, 2004 Joint City Counal/Planning Commission Workshop June 23, 2004 June 23, 2004, Adjourned Meeting IV. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial They wdl be acted on by the Commission atone time without discussion If anyone has concern over any item, rt should be removed for discussion A VACATION OF DRAINAGE AND TRAIL EASEMENT OF PARCEL MAP NO 15349 (V-196) - KB HOME GREATER LOS ANGELES-A request to vacate drainage and trail easement north of Church Street on the east side of Milliken Avenue - APN 0227-151-73 Related file Tract 16512 - PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA July 14, 2004 RANCHO cUCAMONGA 'z B DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-01186 -YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, L P -The design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for a previously approved tentative tract map consisting of 15 single- family lots on 4 39 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan in the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development, located at the southwest corner of Banyan Street and Day Creek Boulevard -APN 0225-161-45 Related Files Tentative Tract Map SUBTT14493, Variance DRC2003-01187, and Minor Exception DRC2004-00322 Staff has found the protect to be within the scope of the project covered by a prior Environmental Impact Report certified by the County of San Bernardino Board of Supervisors in June of 1991, and Supplemental Environmental Impact Report and Initial Study/Addendum certified by the City of Rancho Cucamonga on October 26, 1999, and August 1, 2001, respectively, and the protect does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in that Environmental Impact Report, Supplemental Environmental Impact Report, and Initial Study/Addendum V. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items are public hearings rn which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project Please wart to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project Please sign rn after speaking C VARIANCE DRC2003-01187 -YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, L P - A request to allow up to an 8 5 foot combination freestanding/retaining wall height for grade differential purposes, where a maximum 6-foot wall height is permitted, along the southerly property line of Lot 10 of previously approved Tentative Tract Map SUBTT14493 in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda North Speafic Plan in the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development, located at the southwest corner of Banyan Street and Day Creek Boulevard -APN 0225-161-45 Related files Tentative Tract Map SUBTT14493, Development Review DRC2003- 01186, and Minor Exception DRC2004-00322 Staff has found the protect to be within the scope of the protect covered by a prior Environmental Impact Report certified by the County of San Bernardino Board of Supervisors in June of 1991, and Supplemental Environmental Impact Report and Initial Study/Addendum certified by the City of Rancho Cucamonga on October 26, 1999, and August 1, 2001, respectively, and the protect does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in that Environmental Impact Report, Supplemental Environmental Impact Report, and Initial Study/Addendum • • n U - PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO July 14, 2004 L'UCAMONGA 3 D CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003-01160 - FANCHER DEVELOPMENT - A request to develop a 6,502 square foot P F Chang's restaurant with bar with two patio areas totaling 1,121 square feet in the Mixed Use Distnct of the Victoria Gardens Regional Center, located on the east side of Day Creek Boulevard, north of Foothill Boulevard -APN 0227-201-35 This action is within the scope of the protect reviewed in an Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No 20010301028) prepared for Development Agreement 01-02, Victoria Community Plan Amendment 01-01, and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTT15716 that was certified by the City Council on February 20, 2002, and no additional environmental review for the discretionary actions mentioned in this notice is requHed pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166 E TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM 16237- CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to subdivide 9 23 net acres of land into 8 parcels for the purpose of developing a shopping center in the Mixed Use District of the Victoria Arbors Master Pian, located at the southeast corner of Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard -APN 0227-161-39 Through the preparation of an Initial Study, this action has been determined to be within the scope of the supplement to the Victona Arbors Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (State Clearinghouse No 98041137) that was certified by the City Council on July 7, 1999, and no additional environmental notice for the discretionary actions pertaining to the proposed protect is requHed pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166 Related ftles Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00504 and Variance DRC2004-00522 F CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003-00504 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to develop a village commeraal center consisting of 6 specialty retail and restaurant buildings, 1 bank, and 1 specialty market building totaling 79,661 square feet on approximately 9 23 acres of land within the Mixed Use District of the Victoria Arbors Master Plan, located at the southeast corner of Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard -APN 0227-161-39 Through the preparation of an Initial Study, this action has been determined to be within the scope of the supplement to the Victoria Arbors Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (State Clearnghouse No 98041137) that was certified by the City Councl on July 7, 1999, and no additional environmental notice for the discretionary actions pertaining to the proposed protect is requHed pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166 Related files Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16237 and Variance DRC2004-00522 G VARIANCE DRC2004-00522 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to reduce the building and landscape setback from the requHed 45 feet to 20 feet for Bwldings A and H along Base Line Road within a '~ _-, PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA July 14, 2004 jtANCxo CUCAMONGA 4 proposed village commercial center totaling 79,661 on approximately 9 23 acres of land in the Mixed Use District of the Victoria Arbors Master Plan, located at the southeast corner of Base Line Road and Day Creek - Boulevard -APN 0227-161-39 Through the preparation of an Irntial Study, this action has been determined to be within the scope of the supplement to the Victoria Arbors Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (State Clearinghouse No 98041137) that was certified by the City Council on July 7, 1999, and no additional environmental notice for the discretionary actions pertaining to the proposed protect is regwred pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166 Related files Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16237 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00504 H TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16482 -CREATIVE BUILDING CONCEPTS - A request to subdivide 65 acre of land into 2 lots in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwellmg units per acre), located on the west side of Hellman Avenue at the terminus of Eiger Way -APN 0208-162-30 This action is categorically exempt per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15315 Minor Land Divisions I TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16481 -CREATIVE BUILDING CONCEPTS - A request to subdivide 957 acre of land into 3 lots, 2 lots to front on Hamilton Street and 1 lot to front on 19th Street m the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located near the southwest corner of 19th Street and Cartilla Avenue -APN 1076-151-04 This action is categorically exempt per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15315 Minor Land Divisions J ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2004-00371 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to change the General Plan land use designation from Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) to Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) for approximately 9 acres of land, located at the northwest and southwest corners of Victoria Street and East Avenue - APN 0227-061-38, 70, 71, 72, 78, and 81 and 0227-121-38, 39, 40, 44, 45, and 46 Related file Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment DRC2004-00402 Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of - environmental impacts for consideration Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration K ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2004-00402 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to change the Etiwanda Specific Plan land use designation from Low Residential (2-4 dwellmg units per acre) to Very Low Residential ( 1-2 dwelling units per acre) for approximately 9 acres of land, located at ~J • • C~ • - PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA July 14, 2004 R~~tio cvc,+raoNCn 5 the northwest and southwest corners of Victoria Street and East Avenue - APN 0227-061-38, 70, 71, 72, 78, and 81 and 0227-121-38, 39, 40, 44, 45, and 46 Related file General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00371 Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental Impacts for consideration VI. PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the time and place for the general public to address the commission Items to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda VII. COMMISSION BUSINESS L ELECTION OF PLANNING COMMISSION OFFICERS M 1JESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS N TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE APPOINTMENT VIII. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11 00 p m adjournment time If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL ADJOURN TO A WORKSHOP IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING IN THE RAINS ROOM TO DISCUSS PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2004-00635 - MORRISON 1, Gail Sanchez, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on July 8, 2004, at least 72 hours poor to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964 2 at 10500 Civic Center Dnve, Rancho Cucamonga ~~~~-> If you need speaal assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Division at (909) 477-2750 Notification of 48 hours poor to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired Vicinity Map Planning Commission July 14, 2004 H * Meeting Location Rancho Cucamonga City Hall 10500 Croic Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 N City of Rancho Cucamonga ~~ ~,~ • Staff Report DATE: July 14, 2004 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer BY: Rene Guerrero, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: VACATION OF DRAINAGE AND TRAIL EASEMENT OF PARCEL MAP NO. 15349, V-196, LOCATED NORTH OF CHURCH STREET, EAST SIDE OF MILLIKEN AVENUE - APN 227-151-73 Related File TR.16512 • BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: On August 28, 2001, Parcel Map 15349 recorded with a 15-foot wide dedication of an easement for future drainage and trail purposes The master trail plan was subsequently modified and the proposed trail location was no longer necessary The proposed adjacent development of Tract Map 16512 processed a Lot Line Adjustment eliminating 10 feet of said easement The remaining 5 feet of said easement shall be vacated, as the proposed trail is unnecessary and unusable On November 12, 2003, Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract Map 16512 per Resolution No 03-169 with the condition to vacate the easement for drainage and trail purposes RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission make the finding, through minute action, that the vacation is in conformance with the General Plan. This finding will be forwarded to the City Council for further processing and final approval -R(e/`s~p'ectfully submitted, Dan ~rr~~~~~ • Senior Ciwl Engineer Attachments Vicinity Map Exhibit "A" -Legal Description Exhibit "B" -Vacation Exhibit ITEM A EXI-IIBIT A Sheet 1 of 1 EDIT "A" DRAINAGE AND TRAIL EASEMENT VACATION CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA BEING THAT PORTION OF PARCEL 2 OF CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER 572 IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, RECORDED MARCH 18, 2004 AS DOCUMENT NO 2004-0186721, IN OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS THE SOUTHERLY 5 00 FEET OF THAT CERTAIN 15 00 FEET WIDE EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE AND TRAII. PURPOSES DEDICATED ON PARCEL MAP 15349, AND SHOWN ON MAP THEREOF FILED IN BOOK 193, PAGES 42 THROUGH 44, INCLUSIVE, OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY SAID SOUTHERLY 5 00 FEET ALSO BEING THE NORTHERLY 5 00 FEET OF SAID PARCEL 2 AND CONTAINING 0 063 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS • AS SHOWN ON THE MAP ATTACHED HEREWITH AND MADE A PART HEREOF, EXHIBIT "B" prepared by Madole and Associates, Inc (,~ ~ o ~./~i/0~, ~ P S 8 ~ Na 4756 W~ILam Roazo Lasso S 4756 ate * ~ 9.30 OS Exp 9-30-2005 ~ u ~~ r D ,.:; ~i ._~ P' Q~ I I ~w ~ ~Q I N Ao I ~~ I W N r o ~~ N r U ~°~ ~mN rv ~~ ~ ~' Z ~ +i C i ~ ' Z _ C W/CLWM ROARO P L S 4756 E? DATE 0 /8 ~1 _~--- I~ _ • DRAINAGE AND TRAIL EASEMENT VACA 1-ION EXHIBIT "B" N 78'03 ZI" E v 553 OS' IHE SOUINERLY X00' OF IFIE 100' HIDE fASEME7VT fUR ~n ORAILWGE AND 1RVL PY/RPDSES, ALSO 1H£ NORINERLY 5.00' Of PAR. Z OF LLA 572 CONTAINING 0.06J AC. PAR 2 L L A 572 DOC NO 2004-189721 A MN T 0 i5" W10f EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE AND TRAIL PURPOSES PER P M 15349 PMB 193/42-44 Q !2' W1Df SIDEWALK AND TRAIL EASEMENT PER P M 15349 PMB 193/42-44 © DRIVEWAY EASEMENT DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT C" OF INSTRUMENT NO 2004-020 1425, 0 R REC 3/24/2004 Q EASEMENT FOR JD/NT USf PER P M 11286 PMB 152/60-62 Q 4' WIDE SIDEWALK EASEMENT PER P M 11286 PMB 152/ 60-62 Q CENTERLINE OF A 5 00 FOOT W/Df LANDSCAPE EASEMENT DESCRIBED IN EXH/BIT 0` OF INSTRUMENT NO 2004-0201425, OR REC 3/29/2004 SNEET 1 OF 7 THERLY LINE OF PAR 2 PAR 1 L L A 572 DOC NO 2004-189721 ---L - -_: ,, ~~ ~___ `~~'6 2 W \ \88.\ s2.~~, U F ~' \ `'~,. \\ ~ ^^ ~ \~~. L~ \ E~ ?A AA• ~` T\\ I~ PARCEL 3 OF P M 15349 PMB 193/42-44 PAR 3 L L A 572 DOC NO 2004-189721 No 4756 Exp 9-30-2005 CURVE TABLE CURVE DEC TA RADIUS LENGTH TAN Ci 0'11 '45 ` 2934 00 10 03 5 OI C2 0 05'52` 2934 00 5 01 2 51 C MADO~E & ASSOCIATES, INC ~~~ CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS LAND PLANNERS AND SURVEYING 10601 CHURCH STREET, SUITE 107 RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CA 91730 CJ ,.. :,_ -., - -~ s i}_, +' s° T H E C I T Y O F ANCtiO CUCAMON'GA Staff Report DATE July 14, 2004 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, Clty Planner BY Donald Granger, Assistant Planner SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-01186 -YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, L P -The design review of budding elevations and detailed site plan for a previously approved tentative tract map consisting of 15 single-faintly lots on 4 39 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan in the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development, located at the southwest corner of Banyan Street and Day Creek Boulevard -APN 0225- 161-45 Related Flies Tentative Tract Map SUBTT14493, Variance DRC2003- 01187 and Minor Exception DRC2004-00322 VARIANCE DRC2003-01187 -YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, L P - A request to allow up to an 8 5-foot combination freestanding/retaining wall height for grade differential purposes, where a maximum 6-foot wall height is permitted, along the southerly property line of Lot 10 of previously approved Tentative Tract Map SUBTT14493 in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan in the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development, located at the southwest corner of Banyan Street and Day Creek Boulevard -APN 0225-161-45 Related files Tentative Tract Map SUBTT14493, Development Review DRC2003-01186, and Minor Exception DRC2004-00322 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Project Density 3 42 dwelling units per acre B Surrounding Land Use and Zoning North- Vacant, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South Single-Family Residential, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East - Single-Family Residential, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West- Single-Family Residential, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) C General Plan Designations Protect Site -Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) North- Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South- Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East -Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) ITEMS B & C PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2003-01186 and DRC2003-01187 -YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, L P July 14, 2004 Page 2 D Site Charactenstics The subtect site has been rough graded and is surrounded by single- family dwelling units to the south, west, and east that were recently constructed The site slopes to the south and no unique physical charactenstics are evident on the site BACKGROUND In June 1991, the County of San Bernardino Board of Supervisors approved the University/Crest Planned Development in the City's Etiwanda North area The University/Crest Planned Development entitlements combined two separately owned properties with 1,238 single-family lots, commeraal, school, park, and open space On October 26, 1999, the Board of Supervisors approved a revision to the Development Plan, which, among other things, separated the University portion of the development from the Crest portion The University portion of the development has since become Rancho Etiwanda ANALYSIS A General The current proposal is for house product only on Tentative Tract Map SUBTT14493 Tentative Tract Map SUBTT14493 was previously approved by the County of San Bernardino The homes will include four different plans, and each plan will have four different architectural styles (Bungalow, Country, Santa Barbara and Ranch) The models include front porches or an option for aside-on third car garage All models that rear-on to Day Creek Boulevard and Banyan Street will have decks as a standard feature B Minor Exception The protect includes an approved entitlement for a Minor Exception (DRC2004-00322) that was previously approved by the City Planner The Minor Exception will allow_up to 8-foot high freestanding walls for sound attenuation purposes for lots that have reverse frontage along Banyan Street and Day Creek Boulevard The standard height limit for walls in residential districts is 6 feet Penmeter wall heights in excess of the standard 6-foot height limit along Banyan Street and Day Creek Boulevard are necessary to provide sound mitigation from truck trip noise to and from the rock crushing facility located northwest of the protect site C Vanance The applicant has applied for a Variance to allow up to an 8 5-foot combination freestanding/retaining wall height for grade differential purposes, where a maximum 6-foot wall height is permitted, along the southerly property line of Lot 10 The Vanance is necessary in order to avoid a "no mans land" maintenance area located at the south property line of Lot 10 and to create an adequate level of pnvacy between the lots Without the Vanance, construction of a 2 1 downslope would be necessary between the two lots, and the area would be located in a way that would not promote maintenance FACTS FOR FINDINGS The purpose of a Variance is to provide flexibility from the stnct application of development standards In order to grant a request for a Vanance, the Planning Commission must make a serves of findings Generally, these findings focus on unique or special circumstances applicable to a specific property Following are facts to support the necessary findings 1 Fact Literal enforcement of the wall height limit would cause a physical hardship and practical difficultly for development of the property due to the presence of a grade differential that was created when the adtacent subdivision was graded Enforcement of the wall height limit would necessitate a 2 1 downslope condition at the property Ime, B,c a PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2003-01186 and DRC2003-01187 -YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, L P July 14, 2004 Page 3 which is undesirable for maintenance purposes and contrary the Design Policies of the Planning Commission Findin That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the speafied regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the obtective of this Code 2 Fact The adtacent lot (Lot 55 of Tentative Tract SUBTT 14493-1) has a pad elevation that is several feet lower than the subtect property (Lot of 10 of Tentative Tract SUBTT14493), thereby creating exceptional arcumstances with regard to achieving an adequate level of side yard pnvacy between the two lots and the avoidance of a downslope maintenance condition on Lot 55 of Tentative Tract 14493 Findin That there are exceptional or extraordinary arcumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone 3 Fact Literal enforcement of the wall height limit would deprive the applicant of development entoyed by other properties in the Low Residential District by regwring the applicant to significantly alter the proposed design of the subdivision Alternative design and construction methods are not feasible for the subtect property, and have not been required of other properties in the Low Residential District within the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development Findin That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the speafied regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in same zone 4 Fact There are grade differences between the subtect lot and the adjoining lot Finding That the granting of the Variance will not constitute of a grant of speaal privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same zone 5 Fact Granting of the Variance will provide adequate pnvacy between the side yards of two single-family dwelling units and enable the maintenance of private yards by avoiding the construction of a downslope maintenance area Finding The granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially incurious to the properties or improvements in the vianity D Neighborhood Meeting The developer conducted a neighborhood meeting at an elementary school located less than 1\4 mile from the protect site on April 29, 2004 Two residents attended The residents had general questions about the protect, ranging from the number of homes to estimated dates of construction The developer answered the . residents' questions, and both residents were supportive of the protect E Design Review Committee The Design Review Committee reviewed the project on May 18, 2004, subject to conditions contained in the attached Resolution of Approval ~,C 3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2003-01186 and DRC2003-01187 -YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, L P July 14, 2004 Page 4 F Grading Review Committee The Grading Committee reviewed the protect on May 18, 2004 The Committee recommended approval of the protect subtect to conditions contained m the attached Resolution of Approval G Technical Review Committee The Technical Review Committee reviewed the protect on May 18, 2004 The Committee recommended approval of the protect subtect to conditions contained in the attached Resolution of Approval H Environmental Assessment In June of 1991, the San Bernardino Board of Supervisors certified the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (State Clearinghouse No 88082915) for the University/Crest Planned Development The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) provides that once a Master EIR has been certified, no further EIR or Negative Declaration is regwred for subsequent protects within the scope of the Master EIR On October 26, 1999, the Board of Supervisors certified a supplement to the EIR (State Clearinghouse No 98121091) because of a revision to the Development Plan, which, among other things, separated the University (Rancho Etiwanda) portion of the protect from the Crest portion The proposed protect falls within the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development In August of 1999, the City of Rancho Cucamonga prepared an Addendum to address issues associated with adoption of the Rancho Etiwanda Development Agreement The Addendum identified no substantial changes in the protect that would require a mator revision to the previous EIR Mitigation measure No 101 for the Final EIR and Supplemental EIR for the University/Crest Protect requires that acoustical studies be prepared to assess noise levels for subsequent tracts within the University/Crest Protect area In accordance with this regwrement, a noise study was completed by Mestre Greve Associates for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT14493 (March 16, 2004) The noise study concluded that exterior living areas would be exposed to noise levels exceeding City standards The sound study evaluated the sound of levels of traffic from Day Creek Boulevard, Banyan Street, and the 210 Freeway Additionally, the sound study recorded early morning (5 30 a m to 9 a m) noise measurements from heavy trucks traveling from the Hanson Aggregate processing facility located northwest of the protect site The study recommended noise barriers and speaal construction techniques to reduce noise to acceptable levels Speafically, the study recommended constructing a 6- foot high sound wall along the perimeter of Lots 1 through 6, a 7-foot high sound wall along the perimeter of Lot 7, and an 8-foot high sound wall along the perimeter of Lots 8 through 10 to mitigate sound levels from Day Creek Boulevard and Banyan Street Sound walls, in accordance with the height recommendations of the sound study, are proposed as conditions of approval for Development Review DRC2003-01186 _ In accordance with the condition of approval for Mitigation measure No 101 for the Final EIR and Supplemental EIR for the University/Crest protect regwnng that detailed indoor noise analysis for house product be performed, an interior noise study was completed by Mestre Greve Associates (March 16, 2004) The detailed interior noise analysis concluded that standard construction practices (tile roofs, insulation m the stud cavities, 112-inch drywall, etc) would provide adequate exterior to interior sound attenuation for Plans 2 and 4 The remaining Plans 3 and 5 will regwre operable windows to be B, c ~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2003-01186 and DRC2003-01187 -YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, L P July 14, 2004 Page 5 upgraded to an Exterior Wail Noise Rating Scale of 26 The regwred window upgrades for Plans 3 and 5 on specific lots, in accordance with the recommendations of the sound study, have been included in the proposed conditions of approval for the protect The sound study performed by Mestre Greve Associates utilized the SOUND32 model (March 16, 2004) Consistent with the City of Rancho Cucamonga protocol, the sound study completed by Mestre Greve Associates was evaluated by an independent third party, Marlund Hale, P E ,PhD The evaluation of the independent third party concurred with the sound analysis and the corresponding sound wall mitigation measures recommended by Mestre Greve Associates Staff is of the opinion that no further environmental review is necessary because the protect is (1) consistent with the approved Development Agreement for Rancho Etiwanda, (2) within the protect scope of the above-cited, pnor Environmental Assessments, and (3) all potentially significant effects have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed protect CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing m the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radws of the protect site RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review DRC2003-01186 and Varance DRC2003-01187 through the adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with Conditions Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB DG/ge Attachments Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "B" - Tentative Tract Map Exhibit "C" - Grading Plan Exhibit "D" - Site Plan Exhibit "E" - Elevations Exhibit "F" - Floor Plans Exhibit "G"- Landscape Plan Exhibit "H"- Design Review Committee Agenda and Action Comments dated May 18, 2004 Exhibit "I" -Initial Study Draft Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2003-01186 Draft Resolution of Approval for Variance DRC2003-001187 ~i C nl n •d~ _ _ _ _'1±I~ r L~7 li ,~~ ~ _~ I G% I 5'~ rg I cid 50 5:! ~, ~! ! ~d) I ,;n III ~i it I s t'~Iy¢'I ~ i I . I I i ~l ,I n I I - m; :, I I ~, , E;~ 1 ~ r ; h I 41 I .'°,'~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ I 1 I!i III I ''I I ~ ~ - - _ ;~ V II ~, - ~• ~ - ~tt~ON9TONE.-owve .~]•I. .~-_,....-`.`_.-- _ ____ _ ~ _ ~'~ i~ ;q I IRAPLFLr1 g71W ArI0A i ~ _ - _ _ n F!I'rLIRc YCrI'rA°Y~/E=TH~.CT rIU W+l ri ' ~ i ' - LSIIJGL~ F'AFdILY Fic.5U7ttITIAk~ ! ; I F•ARI~ I~ I ~il~o~~' ~ ~ ~`, I I I 4 6 S _fRAGT Nil 14^9- ~~p~~K~~~~ ~ I 14 ~ IO ~ -12 ~ II I YJ C ~~ ~ ~~ 'I (51NGI_E-IFAMILY~ RESICIE~MTIAL) iql y~ ~i~!~ ~ ~ I I~ I~ __ _. I_ Y __ _ i i _ _ _ _ - ____ __,___ ^^--~^°°°- ' BANYAN~ss-STREET ~~._.V ~`i;-~ -_, l^~ r S C U` u L J '' I '~ IWOtl w~ •~, Ir ~ ~ ~ w, I sr~ I , 1y 1 15 i- _ _ ~ _ BLUE __ 1{5 v - ~~9i ~ '~ ° ___'~• I , ~_ C la, ''~~ 1 ~~ .,_I ~ za I zz ~ 21 is i _ _ I I gl , la j ~ ~ ' ~- I I I i S j I 1 2 3 4 5 6 rRAC r r {naoa (SINGE ~KAML• RESIDE IAI_) -SPRUCE-~ T.- OflNE L -_..-,T _ Y w is i2 n ~ B s - w ___~ _ _ LEGEND I a - L ~a.,~,.~~~,.a,K, ,I , ~~, ~ I I;? UC ~.,,, I 9 ' I ~ I ~ ~ I ~ ;, 1 II ,~,I~iz~ ~_~~;~%~ I ei~~~:1D~LI~~~~~ej ~n~~ ii'-- -- I ._ _ 7 , i a ; 55 II ~• I i. ~ '~1 ~ I fRAGT NJ 13-1 _ _ _ (5!~tF FAf~ILY R.S ErffIAL~____ ~_ i I __ _ W' 'i i I I I ____ ! __ _ -, Ij__ _ _ D p __ '^ ~I ~ I ~__~____ ~ ~ _~ __,_~_ _ ___ 1 ~I ~ I . _ _ __ ~ ! I ~ ~ I ~! ~~ as j °;z ~ I ~ ^,a ,;I nD aD i ae ~ e% ~ I ae I _ __ _ _ -{ D I II I i I i I i i I ~ 5D -- - -- __ __ 4! i----~-- -- I I ---r---' -- ~ -j- --f- I- i --I I CI r--- ---- j e I I I I I I Pd 6n _ _ 1 ~ I 53 5n ___ ~I _ __ _ _ J _y5 ~ 4E nr , Ad I 4D i 50 I it 62 I 1 % f~ ~ ~ ~ ! i ~ ~ I 91 1 ! ~; ~ ~ ~f '' I II ~~ rl` .. . ; ~ ~~ I L, °~- ~' - I ¢ % ~ PREPARED FOR' YOUNG CALIFORNIA IIOhfES .,.o.~., ,o~.,~o~ IYitACT-tom yy p FJ90? PREPARED BY ~ a0 ~ I i % SNGL" r'AMLY ~ _ .,..... RESIUENTIAI_) - _ _ _____ _ , - TENTATIVI - ! ~ ~ TRACT NO. 1449. 9 RESIDENTIAL LOTS 1-t f I -1 SITE UTILIZATION MA I ~,rmvi, o E aiaii A ) w~. U ~.e ec ~ j~ I ~ " ~" Sheet 3 of~ N Y = ,V^J PREPARED FOR YOUNG CAL[FORNIA HOMES (I i0 (L C~PNOM[~I630)fl~l~]r C~ 9(OES PREPARED BY \ 8 ~~~~ - _r r.n ~.•.• PROJECT SITE SHEET NDE% ( COVER SEE(/511EE(lICEz 2 9(E ll(LRA1gN RpiO/EW RACM1B 1 @IE UlL6A1gN MAP ~ PETALED Ef(E PLAN 5 f.CNCEPNAL OiACfq PLAN e Roues aRADRD PLAN ~ aRADwD SECnoNs TENTATIV TRACT NO. 1449 RESIDENTIAL LOTS 1- COVER SHEETISHEET INDt ryPrlrvib Oaie VnpvM NOKMBEN)5 Sheet 1 of VICNR7 MAP ~ T_ ._ iii ~~.; II~~ __ ,c_-=~~~= ~p__= 91 I I , u 'I I I c --, f'^ '1 ~' Il-ft~ ~l-t, ,~~~-f•, .,1 i~;' _t_:-- _ ~~~ I ~I ~ ems, 't~ ~] ~ I ~ ~x .~, ~. 'I 7j'/ _ _ F10NSTON~ - i DIiNE ~ _ _- NNEr T'FMAiNE TRACT £I25 ~ °,~ ..L_`li~_ ~ "^ -'~~ It ~ ETINANJA ~ , ~`~ 'iI 1 ~~ ~'_ I ~=~I ' i ~=~,~ 1 ~r --T_ _, ~`L'c („ ,57~", .. _ ISYYrI%~AA4_Y Rr'_SbENTIAU - I PARK -rr-- __ _ __ _ __1- - TRACT i7Mli ~~~~I I I 1 ~ i 1 -~-7 iT~ I_ ! I ~` ISIbLF FAh4.Y RESDFNRY'.1 IIw it ~ U~- I ..4,4.~_fl: - ~~ ;n .! `~ ' , ~ I µ°: µ°..l ~,...._ xx°x...x„onµ..~E 1 ` ~ ~~ i~, 1' ~-_,~ ~I "~~ ~~~~~,.~~ ~ ~ Q I I I.wm..wuwu:.l rcxw+...xo w..Lwel _~T I~~_~}I '~ 7x W TYPICAL LOT DRAINAGE ---fll ~~p~OpppQ~ ~i 1' ~n I ~ I~ z~ .~~ ~~ NTS _ __ -_ - _ -- ~I ~LL ,~` _ 6._ .-' ,.~ _~~_ ~ _ _~ - _.°..°.,.'~..:~° I D] ~~~ RETAINING WAIL ACCESS DETAIL _ _ uwia_ ___ _ _ - - - uetr~+a.r - - - --E'.°".~ _ . STREET, -'=- - - -- BANYAN ~ - ~ - - ~~~~ ~,.' I __SUMMIT M , ROCKING HORSE PLACE- Myd ~..a Nff AVENUE '".m`~- . 1' .. I..~ ~~ .Ter. _ ~. [l.Nnl __ ..^I I.,.I.., f' sTyL 69f-'^~ Y.-~ r~iS- j!"1~- J .., I ".t4ti'~ .. ' ~ ~ ~ti f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ex y s Ili ~ ~ _ ~~ ~ t ~ ~ uz j I ~ W mac., ,~..^ „, -~-- I iT _I ~ ~~1 ~ r ~ -~I '-a _ ~ - ~ ~ I[ e_~ I~ ~~ ~'` ~ :, ~ p I Ifj p, -~,y 1 r ~ BLUE SPRUCE- ~ __ I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ti ~ JI(J'~~ i ~~ aa~ DRIVE'_ 'I ~~6 ° Ij ?~ .I .ll ~~ :a~l~.ro ~~~ - _ y d x ~~- b -~ ~ ~ I~ 89(I a lI I "~ir ~~ ~I JILL-{1.~ - ~~ ~~ _ ~ ~ ~_ ~1~ 1~ ~ I ~~ LEGENO• I ~ ~ A J• ~. _.~ •U~ ~`~ ~~ -•`~•µ a ~ : ~ a li~ ii ~ i~ _- ~n.~ w,c.e°un... 4I I~ -r - -' ~ I L ~§ J;'=t~.: '~• ~ - _ - _ ~ - ._ ~ -o: ~ I III ~ : ~.o,>«.~ ,°,.,.~.., y I ., r imne ' rxiw I I _ =,p~. L-~.,I ',~ ~` ~ '9 ~r.~E.w..~uE.. x ti~~91i Ty'}' -n~.au ws e.-,a,.w... xro,.«. PR~AFiED FOR ~ `G I .....w..R.... i ~ II I iRUT rAOZ YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOM1IES FI ~ I ~ i ~ ~ }I I,~ AEI [I ~ I ' I SMGLE FAALY T .,~° W..°..N., I~ I~ 4~^-.{I +~' ~" 1~~. [~~E ,I, f` -:~~1, ~I __ - _~ I U..w..o..w.~ ..,uac.~lxu .u~~as .uos c. s.axz i i Y 1 vw I Y-II+.II { ~ 'L- _ I I '4"~=1{ '~(I I~ li vxoxv fesol w-nv ~~_ ._ t L I ' RFSOFNTIAU Li,-I >~_ `I-1 °!"'i~~-c.~ ^L }.,R I..._x:I=1. °i°~--:_ ~- ~_>-~-~,- (- I ~qI ~~..aa~~ ~-' I I i -~_ .,aa,~.a~ °,.., PREPARED BY s I~ f APPIAN DRIVE I I'" all ~~ I ~ i (I I ,f ~I~-- :=~e_{-~.~1~' -..=a.~=.;. _'-I~.~_: .1.~-~= __-~ s~ !n ~~E _ 1'"^ -,.r~ ~ ~ I II ._ow...~ ~ ;~1,+1:' .~~ 1(kR f.?~ 1~~-r~lA~~ t Z ' ~I~m ~t' I I ~I -'tltt ~'~~ ~ I I~ ~z_o~r .~xss.~°.o.......~.xd. ,,., _-__ I ~ r ~ i~~,~ rl~~ i ~I ~' I '~ hl"~4~',Ij p ~~I ~ ~ ;~~ ~»a,E~~I,a.>„.»ox TENTATIVE -. i_ ~ I ,_-,e- ___ I..e~.a.~L~,w, TRACT NO. 1449: I--~~' _ ~I: ~., ~ _11_-t ;-,~--,a ~~ ~.~~ III ~I I ij RESIDENTIAL LOTS 1.1' --.;.~.~.,T I i -__L - - ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~MI 611 Ir ~ I li ' r' I~ ~ ' I _` _' '~' I ~ ~ ~- _ _t ~ ~ I I --' a °°"°""""'""~"°°'"' CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAT l I J I -{IkI I~ ~t~ i L.• '`l vma one B.rruE Mancx33d I ''~ Y ~~I~I ~.1' ~l. _~ ~-Y~ ~~'-{ i ~ rJ~ S ~ ~ ~'~~ ~ 6, ~ 111 ~i I ~ n .~ I «i I wl. r,er>°e occeuecnz za i{{+~Y~~p€ R„~I II ~ ~I I' ff 1 ~ I ' I III I Sheet 5 of i ~k~ l & 7 I I ~ 17"" ~_.. I .°a..o°~.a w.~..r.w.m .~.-.-in,.~... xm y ~ 6 ~ - ~ 3 e ~ ~ ! 4 ' ~ ~ § Y w ~ 3g 3 ~~K.,a~ t~~YSg n~eE ~ ~K' . g ~ £ ~ L ~~~~P~~gw~~~~~~~~~~ ~ €~ ~~ 0 W i~,~s~ I ~ i I~ 4~' ~ ~~~ ~ -~ I !I s _ ~~ ~ J ggw rE ~ ~ ~ d 3: ~- L„ Q~J Z ¢a (Q~B ~: J Q O a N3F Qs_ ~ :: ZD = ~ as ~~s Boa E~iir = W Z ~ U ~ E ~ V ~ ll Q ~~ Zl !E y~ »<` ` , mf s~ ~ St . E ~~ _ L- J ~ Y d ~~m jadj I i ~v~~ ~ ~ -~ ~. ,p J ri , ~ f~, ~~~A~ ~~-= 1 ~ b ~ C r __~ __ .. .. ~ _ pp _ _ `- p _± ~ _-- ~ _ - O QF __ _ Y __ - [ `_~. ~_ _ _ sm gd C1 U F ``iiTTAII,R°,R°~: ~ f 7 Y yP l E S i c a° a- ~eF 0 d x F~ I ` Fr',°T'~Y~ ~ ~ p' way'-` Y 8 FF !S m i hF' i F F ; "~ ~ Fes'', =~ _.y Fug-'.~ 7~ ~ of cW79~~FII=s,'^~.' EF. pF :r k-~r. rs t~ ~£ 4 6 \` 1! -~~~.az-r c-Z ~F t ~FF 9 0~g t~ be b ~F t i ~( FF § y P 4 9' W rv f ~~F ,I ~'--'_ t~ ~~~ l_ '' ~ ~ "- iu -~ I > ~ p `O ~ -® ~., '„~ ;:::: ~. , I b, ~ ~ o W ~'I r :L RR "e F F ~ O:? .c: Op F ~T J Q~. ~ W 3 Eo Pqpg. x ..., , ~ Q N ~ Y~ G dpi i"a_ ~~ -~~ a ZO 2 Z o6 Le. x ~_ ;'ill' W Z ° o ~~ ~ USe U ~ m O ~ :~ I ~ c-~ e F_~ ~ z e • a aW . } Q LL -_ ornanw r~o era ~~ y _ _ ~V .~ .~~ ~: o i '~ ,. °6 '- ---' I ----- e~ ^ ___ _ -_ ~, q ~ l--I t~ d ~ .. _ ~ ~-, '~} _ ' -- _ - - ~; F- ---' - ' =i ~, c ca '- - K K= [E F9 !~ F }; 'i g iF e a 3 ~4 ~F i ~( tl f I ~{ bg~Y, 5 .. '_~ d 11 [3 a§~~ o„p~ -~ II~9II~ ~' e ru u s[§~ x~ £~~I °yg~ .... e Y e;RR. ss:~ ~ ~ Yee~ ~ c a ^~ ~ o % > u ~ ~ f F f d'ax k a ° a ~ ~ ~A-? ~ ° _ ~ , O °=~ ~~ ~, ~~ ~~ ~ ----- 1 -_ --- ~ a~~~ I C7dVA3~nOB ~k.~ ~133FJ~ °4 -tit y, ~ I~~ p I I IQ 1 ~~~......$$$ ~I p,i ~ -- - ~~_s7 1 * -- ~F~Ijtl~ zl~ „ 0 ~~~i` '~jfL ~ ~ ___-_-~~ ~ _ _ '- ___-ter -_ _ 31~~ ~ 30tl1d ~ °e 30tl1d J - _~~ i _-93HON'`JhMH~ ~ 36lJOFj' 'JNIN~OFf I ~ _ I ,} - _ ,I -__ __- 4I S.J 'III ~ I S ~~ ~ ?il ~ .J i ~ -,~.--+-J -__ i al P r~ Ali ;i , r'-'~-_~ -.. -___ '~ 9 c'd 'I I ~I ~ .NP_ __~~ ~ ~ 4' ~ n ~ [ --s.. ~\ 1 WM~ _ ~~~~ 1 ~ ~ O J ~p ez W , y v O ~a~ W F ~~ O~C So a~e O: a~~ 4 Q ~ ~ fF [ ¢ do ~ J ~ isi f Z 0 2 W i db . € g ~ oa ~ . 'ilr4 c WW Z~ a ~ o ~ yy V ~ `y ` r F z W ~ -_ ~ -1 d$o m V ~ $ ~'} e ~ ~ ~ ~ pp a=y ~ ~ ~ i S P T 3 3 Y °6 ~ } ~ s § C s. Y . •~g ~ ~~ ~`3 B ~ ~~~ yec~ 3 5~ 4€ ~~~FC°~6~~C775e geCe~ q~ e3 e: F~~~°:~Y°5~~~~[~~€~~ a ~~ s~ v I n i&J~_ IIi'I~p~~.~i d. J I ~ ~~~~ i ' ~ ~ °I I , -1.tl~- ~a y _ -f=:~ - _ -=__ -- ~ t. k {, • i_. ° . n ~F ~--~ r I ee • - _ 3OVld_ llW _ 1ftlQ3~ _--____ ___ j ,,+ ~ i I -.-- -+~ n , i yy~ ~sn`Y w~ f S, ~ ~ J,' r - q_ GYI I -cit ~' ..~ I`Hi I@~~ __ .a F-~~- -- -- ~~- ~7 R~ ~ ~ ~ "_- ~-~~4 _ _ _ I !~~~_~E ~__' 1 - ea, ~~ I~ f~ •- ~ -_ -• ~~ is l't_„~ opl "~~~ -` . - - __a ..__,•~I ~~~•.-4_- ~.v--~- . __, ~ „_ Q ,~-~ 1 ._. x., ~ a i cp,-~~ ~ 1 ,' ~~, 1 _ __ __ •IJ i~ fr~~ I _ ~ •E _`~~w-`r to _ '-_T 1 -~ „_-~` _ 1~j~--____~__~, r-`S' ~4, i~___~_-ter'-~~- { dS `1 ~E J~~~ 4 y ~.J _ _ ~e ;5:~ :_.______t z. ~~Ct~z~z~ ~ 6~ C r1 ,~ ~; //~ l IPIr r~~~F ~I I v )t_. A-BUNGAIAW fl-COUNTRY (; - HANIH V - )Pn I n nnnnnnn PLAN 2 moNrrxRn nl 1 R~Ci NO IaJW MONTERRA AT RANCHO ETIWANDA """` mural nnp~mn al lx~~s rm ~u nml t YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, LP FFIIHUARY II IDIN , ~_ ,, B0.1fR TICCO C STII(COCORpFIS n onmcaa E. SINCCOOVFA iOPN i0.1M 1 td.t 0.ETE R00{INL G RIAMI{AC111REOSIOING N RIANVEACTIRFO BONE I NOOO bREII HIEING 1 SERION \I GAR,10E N0R fP0\ IGE NY. wITN N'MGONS L SIVCCOO\E0. F0.\NTM1IRI SV0.ROIINO Af NININI W[AHG CGORS l OlI1L(gAER AI VIIIONRL Of(R C~ RIGHT V (~y` V o ~M I .I i. ~.III~J zr__~ I~ r;.- !' jl ;i µ ,; ncnn , ELEVATION 2 A BUNGALOW MONTERRA AT RANCHO ETIWANDA YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, LP -! LEFT MONTCXRA III tRACI NO IaaVl 61ntt FILE NO pRCSRIP Rl 1106 IEN Zn ny MR31M1101IS] 11 pRUARY IT !IRH c fi rn ~'I ~~ N_ Vn- --~' 11\Ill \\ I\11\ architecture va1rK P snRCD G ssixmtnmELs U SHI?F[a5 C $Pl'(CO U\F0.1MlI lVM f C01CPEfE0.MfIF0 G !$AMIf/.CnI0.FO SIDMG II AI \NL~IACn PFJ1510NC 1 WINO PoRCII MILINO I 1 rnuxu wamEUaIP o\mF Sn•P wrtx wlxoows en a ccD Dvu ronM ruM waaolmD MMMt P`T UgIgS L IIIIILM\fR M OPTIONAL DCCK ~~ REAR ELEVATION 2 B COUNTRY MONTERRA AT RANCHO ETIWANDA YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, LP R1GIiT MOMI NM III rancr rvD uaaT n ulrc IIIE NO DRLbP OIIPfi A m amunl m F111Rf1ARY 1I NxIJ fEb pIIM O ry~lY __ `s ~~ t~ i l~_ 1^~) V ~J A IIRICK B i1VEC0 C SNCCV C00.BEli 0 SIIIIFIFAS E STUCCOOVE0. (OAM TRIM F COM1C0.EFF ROOFING G RIAMR~CTVRFD SIDMG 11 MnNVFACfV0.CO iTONE 1 WOOO I'DRCII gAILMG 1 SECFIONAL GA0.AGEOMR PR041OF SD%WITfI WMOONS A STVCCOOVEP fOMIT0.IM SVRROVND AT WINDVWi AND DLtlRi L UVTLfN1AC6 M OiCIVNAL DFCA 0 Ir K~ REAR ELEVATION 2 C RANCH ' MONTERRA AT RANCHO ETIWANDA E YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, LP RIGHT MONM10.RA III iRALT NU 14<Yi b ulTi Fu.F NO oncnm onaes ucR~ool nnnr Fi OPUARY I]:MW f[B ¢n ~00< I~ Y„M ~i x ~, y1r 1 ^~ n oucR B STV(CO C SiVCfOCO0.11C15 O 9XVRERS I SiVCCOOVFR FOAAI ThIM F COYCRETE 0.00FIN4 G MANIIFACIllRE051DMG AIANL'!.\CT IRTO STONF Mf 1 FFCTION1l GA0.\OEDIX10. V0.VlIDF 54`: W,FII M'INI%1W3 i L4000O~F0. FOAM i0.1M SVRRVUNO AL 0.1M1MW 51ND I%10R5 ^ OI TI (R~RFR , OtIONAC OtCR .i i t1.D t A,RIf I Tr architecture REAR ELEVATION 2 D SANTA BARBARA MONTERRA AT RANCHO ETIWANtiA YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, LP RIGHT IJ_I I_._~[I. I I_'~ I!I _I_I.. II L'I ~'I n- E~ ,_f LEFT MUN rl NRA I I I IRACT NO I<J9] ISLOT4 FILP NII URCZRR11111 N5h of Rxm] m IR) n ortumrvn mxM rcR>^+oN + rvi~ ~'~ ~~. J`~ ~\ /J ~nr Y~~ ~~ V ~ V I ._I Y ~~ r ~Z 'Sz ~~.~2~7 2~jjyJ~ FE=uCu ^Q LI l 3 ~; [= w w~ 00 xx U¢ ~ ~2 ~O ¢w Q ~~ y. U Ew- ~ z ~o :_ k ~ U rC Y y ~: ~; is V L A t~ x ~~ I ~` aMlx ~ a snrco _ 9TII000fO0.11[LS D SIIVIT[gt E STVCCOO\ER [UAM IIUM f CrMCRFiERW[MO II111111111' C M.1NV[ACTIRF041UM0 ~ N RIAWFA(TIRED 4TONF r n - _ .,. 1, ~ 1 NINIp RURCN gAILMf __~~~ ~ I t[C[I(IN.SL(gRAfF IXpq ~ ...}i F0.11VIUl\V4 \VITH NINWKi ' r R STUCCO UVFR ILIAN TIUMSVMOUVD UU!\IMMNi AND DWRi L UUr EP AI OFIHINAL DFCR I RIG111 V" I cI "II vrcF u 1-n u.c yCl r_v. [gm- ,r'>ff1°ra~~T'a .. a nm i tm-~Er n- t_y-cE~,rL rr~irrn a`s~_ ~ ~'~It L~ C '~"' Z +.rmo. rim ~' rce.,s,¢w~ 1m I~t •gwClll :. .... .. ~~.... ~~ ...1.. Ib.l..q..: ~ ::n.....:1: _ :r....... ~~ -- - i~ ~~~~I iI :I REAR ELEVATION 3 A BUNGALOW MONTERRA AT RANCHO ETIWANDA t _, r _ YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, LP a LEF7 MUVTCRRA III rRAC~ND law! u Lon FILC NO p0.CiRni Rl lRnk ncazml nl lRl r[R .R ~1 fFO0.UA0.Y 11 tUM /P I ~ µq` s ~ ~ t~ x ~~ J 1^~' ~~ 1 II, i^ /' III A tlGtA SiNCCO C 51111Cf1 CORBFLS D SIIlIT1[Xi E S1U1.Cp D\4R iVnA1 TRIM CONCflE1F PUV414G 4 M1NVFA<TURLO tIDL4G 11 ANUFA(I VPFD SipNF I wlnno voflal nnn lNG 1 SECLIUN/J, GnRAGF UDVR PRV\IDE\V WIi11WMDVWS R \iUCCV U\ER FVnSI TtIM NRROVND of N'MD VµS AND pODpS L OVTI fIVKFR M DIFIDNAC DFCK ~~,;~~ REAR ELEVATION 3 B COUNTRY MONTERRA AT RANCHO ETIWANDA YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, LP • MI1Nl FRRn 111 rrzncrw lanm 1<I OTS IILI NU NRl^.DII111114M1d Ut A?dlAol lai Fta sa m+ rnxunnr n znoR > nv: , n^_ t~ (~ ,7-~ nRlflc B yiVCCO C yNfCO fORPELi O qN FiCRl E STUCCO MER fIIn\I Tg1A1 F CONC0.ETF Rg1pMG G MANLFACIVRCD yl01N0 N MANIIFACTVRFV SIONE ~ 1 Nq~D VOR(II RAIL INO 1 SFC FIONIL 4ARnfF pVOR VROVIOF IW WITH WII.WNy A SIFICfOTF0. fOMI TRIM iV0.RDIMp Ai PINWPS AVIlUM1R5 L Ov TLOOACP M Il TIONAI DECA L I tR111S architecture 3lGHR ' ELEVATION 3 C RANCH MONTERRA AT RANCHO ETIWANDA YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, LP /I% RIGHT MONTLRRA III 10.A[T NO IJGOI 14 OTS 111 f NO IIRI LORI 1111 RI. V Ixn+_n1n nl I'll FI nxanxr n zlxw ¢o zr tml ~, ., , ~l I Vn `~` Y 1 BRI[K P SIUfCO G SNCCOCORpF15 p SHSRTF0.5 E t1lgCIl OVER fIIAM INIM f CONCRETE 0.fX1FM4 G MANVSACTI0.FD SIpP10 N M\NVFACLVPEU iIONE 1 NOOD p0.CN pAlI MO 1 SEfTONAL 4ARAFiF M](IR PPOVIpE SVf NITN WMM1W[ K SNCCOOVER FOAM TRIM 5U0.0.0UND AT wINM)W9 ANI1MmR9 1 OV1100KFP M OPTIONAL UFCA r- -- - -~~ ?1--- '.I i i ' - I ii REAR ELEVATION 3 D SANTA BARBARA MONTERRA AT RANCHO ETIWANDA I , .. YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, LP ~ 5', ..., ~` _p k K~ RIGHT vu I MONTCPRA III TRACE NO Ii~V3 I t LDTS ~FILI NU DRl JIU)III IX6 h M0.lInl 011X1 SEB .U AW 9 F4110.UA0.Y 1] 0011a prr NN I N ~ ~: o_ Cry err, PLAN 4 V ~_~~~_~~ TRACE NIJ IJJ4J ~ MONTERRA AT RANCHO ETIWANDA MONTfRRA~II ' ItIAT~ YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, LP a~a;,,°;w;""'""""° RA ,~ -• tl uxunnv n zma » to I~ ~~ _` ^~ \~ _` Y 11\HA \t4%I/Ilt architecture A RRICK e snxm C sNCCO COrtO[Is o sevnrRt E srvcm oacR rnAu nlM F CONCREiERWi1N0 O MANIRACIURLO SIUMG H A4IIIAtn10.L0 {LONE I NfIVU PORCN 0.AILM0 1 iL(TNMII UAPAOF IXgR vROVIOr Y~~ wlnl WINI]UxS K SR'CCOOVLR fUKM i0.1M SVRROUNO 1 WMM1µt A1.p IN%~R{ L LX'ilp X.EP M OviIONAI HECK RtAK ELEVATION 4 A BUNGALOW MONTERRA AT RANCHO ETI WANDA YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, LP ~ ~~ C1 RIGHT III~~,,I ~I~I%~I~II MVMI RNA III TRAR NO Hd9l I{I/M fIIrNO pR<:MII RI IPAk IX R]MI 01IP] YI'RPOART 1] LOIN LEFT I rta nl mw ryh~ t~~ ~~ l^+~ \`^, ` ~ Y C~ ILLS \~V M1'I )fli architecture RRI~R B SNCIO C STLYCO COROELS U SINKERS E STVL CU TER IOAXI@IM f XONC REif R(IOI Mp G ANIIFACE110.lU SIIIMU •i ViAf l\IR FU iFONC WMIO MRL II gAIL MII 1 iFf}IUN RL4AMUF MN)R nmmFVV wnn wlNllowe [ sFIICCO O\rR FOnM rnIM S11RR111n 1i WMM WS 1NO OINIRS L OIIRIXIAER M OI'iION AL OIIA ELEVATION 4 B COUNTRY MONTERRA AT RANCHO ETIWANDA YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, LP • MuNrrxnn nl TRAQ NV IJ191 I) BITS fllr NI) I111(]IXIt 1111X4 ft IK RIMt RI IB1 If11 R11A llY It 3qN rco+• neR N ~IW i ri t~ _ i\ (/V\~ I BRICK \PKCO C ]TIYCOCOR9f L4 D SHVI1E0.5 E S1 V(L()VVCR EOnM I"PIAI f CDNCREFE 0.110fING V MANVFnLTVREDSIOPO N MANVI n[1 VRED STVNF I \\(qO MµCII RAILINf 1 SFRIONAL<AMfiE IX%IR P0.0VIDf 5Tx WITH WMOOWp K SILCCOOVC0. Cp\M IAIM 5//0.80111 WINW Wt 1nO M1NIRS L UUTLMAE0. M OII I(INIL DF[A KCAK ELEVATION 4 C RANCH MONTERRA AT RANCHO ETI WANDA YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, LP MIINTI RRA III TRAR NO IN9J 1510T5 IILF NI111RC31K1\µI IVMA IIjI E9 y]I UCR]M1I101IB) IEnaunar lT nlw rr ,__w^__ r*~' L F A RGCK R fiIICCO C SIiKCOCORRELt O SIMfLR¢ F STI'CCOOVF0. FDAAI TRIM f COM1C0.ElE pOOFMG O MA1.VFtLNRFO SIOMp 11 MANI ILACNREO SLONF I R~LD NgCH 0.AILMG 1 SLC IIONAL 4IMCF IXMR 10.0VIOF app NITN RINW WS R ¢iUCfOOVLR FOAAI TRIM LMROlIM1 AT WIN WN t AND DOOgi L OVII UOA[0. M OMIONAL DfCK ~^ RIGHT ^~ lA+` ~-+ S~ t KYAK ELEVATION 4 D SANTA BARBARA MONTERRA AT RANCHO ETI WANDA YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, LP L_f LEST ' MANI l M1NA 111 TRACF NO N<nl U LOTS FnrNll ImLlm+mlx,.s Ix R~An nun] rrs .I pal ] FFRRUARI I] IAN I~ _,~, ,~ ~ ' ~/ J1_ i m,n~„,„~ ..~ C MNCN u enrv in unnonnn PLAN 5 nowt, rcxn n, MONTERRA AT RANCHO ETIWANDA 'A"~` ~~ ~~~~~ a II,iNO pMb Lr1011P[4 YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, LP ,"„a"",;x;'~,',~. "°"'~' „ 1/n~~' V ` 1 BRICK B Sli CCO G SLUCCOCORBFLi p SIIVIlFR3 E S111000OVfR fOAA1 tRIM NCIIETE ROOfIND I O RM NVIACFVRFO SIDMG 11 MAMIfACN0.EUiTONE N000lORCN RAILMG 1 SECLIONALGARAOE BGMK ' rllovluf ARM NNI wmoows i K SNCCOOVE0. fOAM TRIM SVRROVNO t N'RIIM)uS ANO UMIKt L MItIUOCIR M OMIONAI DECK I RICA r _~ I I ~ i 00 IMV I RLHrt •-. n^ -- ELEVATION 5 A BUNGALOW Al11NF1'aM III IS LOIS z MONTERRA AT RANCHO ETIWANDA ~`"`T ND IuR' I YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES LP FILh NU DaL$Mq-0IIR6. s Ix aaml oun rt9ntxl ~r RRRWL0.1 IT ?UD< ~~ J V I ~ I i~ I I n PRICK B SNCCO c sNCCOmaoMs o sxvireRs E sTICCOUVEP FOwM i0.1M CONL0.ELERmi1N0 O M.nNllinRtrtED 510M0 N MANIIFnCi11aEO5rlINi mO TPC11 RwILMO 1 SfCTIUXnL GSRnGE dMII YRUVIOE SP.4 WIiN WINW WS K 51VCm OVE0. NAM TRIM 5U0.RO1BID mw3 nl+o nuu L MrtLWKfK M OPPONwL OFCK ELEVATION 5B COUNTRY R MONTERRA AT RANCHO ETIWANDA e YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, LP e n ... RIGHT MfIMFMn III 1'MR NO bJ9] Is Lors f1lY N0 ORC:IIOI OI Ii6Q 1%.RZIbr 011P) RO fA EMI n BaUnar Ix xnlw rq pl _~ orv ~~ I~ w` d A B0.1C1 B STVffO C SR`CCD COROCLt D SIIVRE0.5 E SIVCCO WFR EOAN LNM CONCRF1f 0.00EMfi G MANViACNREDSIDMf MANVEALTIPED STINF WDOD MlC110.AILMG t[CTIDMnI GAMOf Op)R F0.0NM 301 WIIN YMpO W3 R SIVCCOOVER EDAM LIIIM SUIIADIIND AT YIMgW'S AND DOG15 M O mdJALL ECI. ELEVATION 5 C RANCH MONTERRA AT RANCHO ETIWANDA t _ YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, LP r~ MONTFpRA UI TRACT NU HJVJ IS LOTf FIIY NO U2000t 111190A T)LN3MIIL118] i L11NUARY I] 31X14 RIGHT LEI'T rFO ~c long r ~~,f I, wm ~ ~~~.~ I' ! i s • ~ 'f~ 1 s_ `V^- C\~ V A PRIM B SNCfO I C SNCCOM0.BELz n sxvnERt E zNCCO UVER EOAAl i0.1M i CONCRTLE ROOEINO G AIANVTACN0.Ep 51pIN0 H I MANVitRIIRFR iL11NC I I WOOp 100.CN RAlIING i I SECIIMtL 4A0.AGE 0000. VROVIOE f11f. WITII P'INpOwt I A S1 VClUU\TR EOAAI i0.1M tV 0.0.MM11 PT PTY[IONt pAO1MO0.t 1 OVRIXAER I M OVIIONAL OCfY. ELEVATION 5 D SANTA BARBARA MONTERRA AT RANCHO ETIWANDA ~ RM __ .,, YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, LP MUNCC0.RA III TRACT NO I4e] I ]LOTS fILC NII URC$IN1]III IPf.k I1CR1INIt RIIPI !LO <I IOII a~ FLRkL1ARY Il $IIM ~~, °~;, I ft1 x s I V^ /'1 C1' ,~ ~i IQ t~r- - -,~°---- ~- 1 < 4 ~ on oecR ^:~~~ ~MASFFA~ BPD0.pDM II l '' ~ 1 pEfREAT/ IDFCREDRM 5 ~ ] ] ~ /~1 _ 0.PD0.0OME MBATN •ic ~ ~ , ' M I BEDROOM J _ RA2~ BEDROOM/ I7 „a. 1.-I------ -1--' ~' ~LI '-1 PLAN 2 2168 TO 2348 SQ FT MONTERRA AT RANCHO ETIWANDA t e.__ ,,, YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, LP MDNTFRRA 111 TRACE NO IM9J I S LIITt FIIF t~O URCIIbt 0110.0& U1R,00101IB] fCBRUARV I] 2o0J flR l ]MI 9 ..IWin~ i ~ • m x i V I I , ~ I-6 A '1 -' OPf OECI[ Q i~ ,f y~ w ~ ~ I M , BEDRM fl ~ 1 REIAEAT M BATH MASTER 1 nG p BFPROOM i .rmy• -~ 9: a14- ___ ~ ~ OPTIONAL II BONU50.0pM1 II BEDRM 6 II ~ 1I~ an» II ~ _ µ BAi ~1 ~~ ^^ I ~ BEDROOMI ~ BEDROOMI em I-l ~_ l I 9 n i r,< ) Y ! PLAN 3 2289 TO 2698 SQ FT MONTERRA AT RANCHO ETIWANDA t ~ YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, LP I ~-{ NWT. }kLL 1 I J{ KITC1@N nAMWY DWING - i ~ / SUPER 6 I ~FAMR Y I I.IYINC BpIR ~ Wp(R SPACE LAU BFD S/DFN d~ ,. t:: PORCH ~ 1 , afARAOE 7I SOVAnE fOC1nGE M()NTlRM 1111 TRACT NO 14!91 1111115 PILL NU 11N11 IN I11141~ 4 ECORUAPY I)'WJ as nlm~ Trr, I I I _. ~¢+ _, `1' y 1 U__ _ 1] B JJ O ~1 -- C1 YY -'r I I I 4 orr oecB 1 I /~ _ ~~_ O _' _ 3 __m, _- - Nook f ~ 1 ~ c 1 BEDROOM} '~ -f ~ 1 BEU0.00M5 .4 7 4 ae IL_II_ ~ M BAtN J. ~V ] 6 ~ C-AABLY E~ ` _ ..1 i ~ FAMLY ~ 1 'V ~1 _ 1 ~ T i ~ MASTFIf ___ BEDROOM ~ ~ - 1 YY 'm I'il ' T' et W F i nY ~ t '~ o 1 _' p ~BAx ~ _ S o• }~~~~ ortroNAL ii Z ..~- jll Borvus ROOM/ it ~ l ewPOOM6 I { III BEUROOMd ~~RWMI 1 LIVING E\.-~~.E1E li '`i EN4RT MAMGP V ~~ t lilt ...~. I .~-. Ti i 'IIt--II+ ?x= .,,..... - - - C~ 1 I ~ I II I WORK SPACPJ _ I 1 _ _ . _ _ _ _ I owroFSIGE I UAflE F00]A4E N(1NfI RR1111 TRACE NO lA 19J i Y~ 1511115 .s«n i• ~ Illf N(1 I)RC301111111ML R .. IH N}Ixll RIIP} mv.-s >.~~ ~ 4YIIRIIARY I] i1R1J PLAN 4 2511 TO 3026 SQ FT '~'~~ ~~~ ~~ I MONTERRA AT RANCHO ETIWANDA I d YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, LP IIR:P:w, x 1 A,,,~ • 1„Pm . _I~ I W_ W ~~ PLANS 2350 SQ FT MONTERRA AT RANCHO ETIWANDA ~ YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, LP en ~~ SOVd IIE FOO LGE MnNI1 NNA l11 T11 /rCf Nrl 1J 191 Ii LOTl '^"' ^' ^ " 41L1 NII I]I1C 2111I]III IXriA IX 2'Il(I] X119] nxw ~n to r :nna RP xn iwl X „i~ w~. I I ~~ I~1 `~~ V v i ;~ VLF ^J` -~ I _ ~ fi A_li _. sr~_ ~. ~ ` L' I I I ~~' -tl~ s a'i~ ry U4 S-- ~4 I ' I - ''~ - ~ - III - y "~ - - -{ --BLUE SPRUCE DRNE- ----- ~ ~V tl .II .' ~~ I \uI~ o-- -yi . I -~' - ~ - U µ~ II I Q 1""le I ~q ;.~ ~ II I, ~ J I'I J IS 1<4 1 ' lE lil 11 J_ I Y Y + 't 'i a zl - - - ~ - - -_ ---------- - s- IA - -:o - -- ,n ii - ,~ II - Aa lh - -q y --- Y ' U II I; 4 =~ ~y~ ~,~;~ > -~~.~ ~~~::.re ,~ ^^BANYAN PERIMETER WAL I~ ~I WALL LEGEN6 SLOPE PLANTING NOTES ~,~ ..ww,.,r_...w., - I ~ ^.bervmexmmm0 r ' -` © ,IR.IFl,.[tt,rN~inrt ~ mf.wx.0.vn e.~ w wr ~ / •r~~A/'~ _ O . rwu.iNmly M'~m.Gn.~im A~klS~.n MR. niv~~lnvr awlYx NI~ M9Jrz ~' ^ ~ •"w.nw.. s,e r....n~.m~^ae.m'~'.".'.n PLANT PALETTE ~ I O' ..o-, n...•r W...w r^.. I. ^~a - " i~ n n J TYPICAL MAR.RO%STAND n „ n,ai mr.. n~:; wr- ~ ~,..~ ~ ` 9n ~L V I ~~ u~ " ~ :,.,::t- wr "'" ° " ~ - I xmr n~ in 9 } u. e~... I ,....... u,.. w.~. Y~B ~- .3 INTERIOR PRIVACY RENPN WALL I B -«2 ^~:~ ' ~~.~:= ~~-- -- I rZ DAYCRE KPE RWA I~VI ~~.~iii'i~. ~~: 10 TYPICAL FRONTYARD LAYOUT V V 55 I I _.._,_~ ,~.-r 6 v w I ~ ---• I I I l . ~.:.~-e If ~:~~, 4 IM OR HA0. 61 NW LL 1 1 9 PERLN R i W T• ~~ rvTa~,Nr ..mw....m....R..wm 9 MONU+IENI WAIL LAYI]Ui DRIVEWAY OPPIONS CONCFI'TUAl1 ANDSCAPE MASTER PLAN TRACT NO 14493 ~ ,• - TERRAVISTACOMMUNTFY RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA YOUNG CALIFORNIA CUCAMONGA, L P ~ MONTERRA III of Rancho Ehwanda w.~..a..,w°,~..~,a•...'-".~-"^•^-~.~." "'" "'°" P~^~. ~.~~"^.° "m w;' ~ II III T r µ..^.m.q.~~~ yTf Si~E o 9 pµOMIDIEM WALL PRONL ELEVATIONAA M°", ~'°~ .nr onm v °d ~- celr3t ~ • OQO 'M~...~'rni.vsRyw....'^ nx...q o.lw~~:~:w.~w.w, DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7 20 p m Donald Granger May 18, 2004 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-01186 -YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, L P -The design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for a previously approved tentative tract map consisting of 15single-family lots on 4 39 acres of land in the in the Low Residential Distract (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan in the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development, located at the southwest corner of Banyan Street and Day Creek Boulevard - APN 0225-161-45. Related Ftles Tentative Tract Map SUBTT14493, Variance DRC2003-01187, and Minor Exception DRC2004-00322 Staff has found the prolect to be within the scope of the prolect covered by a prior Environmental Impact Report certified by the County of San Bernardino Board of Supervisors in June of 1991, and Supplemental Environmental Impact Report and Initial Study/Addendum certified by the City of Rancho Cucamonga on October 26, 1999, and August 1, 2001, respectively, and does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in that Environmental Impact Report, Supplemental Environmental Impact Report, and Initial Study/Addendum Background: The applicant is proposing to develop 15single-family homes on previously approved Tentative Tract 14493 (Monterra 3) Tentative Tract 14493 was previously approved by the County of San Bernardino and annexed into the City as part of the Rancho Etiwanda area The homes • have been designed with four architectural styles (Bungalow, Country, Ranch, and Santa Barbara), and will include a total of four floor plans Three of the plans include front porches, and the remaining plan has an option for aside-on garage The applicant is proposing the same house product that was previously approved by the Planning Commission on September 11, 2002, for Tracts 14493-1 and 14522 (Development Review DRC2002-00442), and for Tentative Tract 16306 (Development Review DRC2002-01029), which was approved on June 25, 2003. Tracts 14493-1 and 14522 (Monterra 1) are located on the west side of Day Creek Boulevard, on the north and south sides of Vintage Drive Tract 16306 (Monterra 2) is located at the southwest comer of Vintage Drive and Day Creek Boulevard The model homes for Tracts 14493-1 and 14522 wdl serve as the model homes for the proposed prolect Design Parameters The site falls within the Rancho Etiwanda planned development, a 1,238 residential unit development approved by the County of San Bernardinoin May 1991, and subsequently annexed in to the City of Rancho Cucamonga The prolect site was rough graded when the Rancho Etiwanda area was mass graded and infrastructure was installed The site is bordered bysingle-family homes to the west and south, future single-family residential to the north, across Banyan Street, and single-family homes to east, across Day Creek Boulevard Development is regulated by a Development Agreement Staff Comments The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion Major Issues The following broad design issues wdl be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this prolect 1 The applicant has worked diligently with staff to resolve all major issues Secondary Issues Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2003-01186 -YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, L P May 18, 2004 Page 2 The site is exposed to noise from rock crusher truck traffic, particularly during early morning hours The developer has prepared a Noise Study that identifies sound mitigation measures, including sound walls up to 8 feet in height along street frontages and special construction techniques The City's noise consultant is currently reviewing the Noise Study Walls over 6 feet in height will regwre a Minor Exception The decks should be a standard feature, not an option, for all lots that have reverse frontage on Banyan Street and Day Creek Boulevard Banyan Street offers prime view opportunities of the mountains Day Creek Boulevard is a Special Boulevard, and the rear elevations of houses that back onto Day Creek Boulevard should receive enhanced treatment Policv Issues The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the protect design without discussion 1 Provide minimum 5-foot setback between public sidewalk and block walls on corner side yards (See problem on Lot 1) 2 All interior private yard slopes are required to be landscaped with ground cover, shrubs and one tree per 150 square feet of area 3 River rock shall be real, or native fieldstone may be used Stone veneers are not permitted 4 Provide decorative pavement on driveways Decorative driveways shall have variation throughout the subdivision. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that, with Secondary Issues addressed, the Committee recommend approval to the Planning Commission Design Review Committee Action Members Present. Fong, McPhail, Stewart Staff Planner Donald Granger The Committee reviewed the protect and recommended approval, subtect to the policy issues and the following condition• The decks shall be a standard feature, not an option, for all lots that have reverse frontage on Banyan Street and Day Creek Boulevard. The decks shall have variation including, but not limited too, variation in the railing, deck sizes, materials, and supporting posts Final design of the decks shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval during the plan check process ~~ u n U City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1. Project File: Development Review DRC2003-01186, Variance DRC2003-01187, and Minor Exception DRC2004-00322 2. Related Files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT14493 3. Description of Project: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-01186 - YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, L P -The design review of bwlding elevations and detatled site plan for a previously approved tentative tract map consisting of 15 single-faintly lots on 4 39 acres of land in the in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan in the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development, located at the southwest corner of Banyan Street and Day Creek Boulevard -APN 0225-161-45 Related Files Tentative Tract Map SUBTT14493 and Varance DRC2003-01187 Staff has found the protect to be within the scope of the protect covered by a pnor Environmental Impact Report certified by the County of San Bernardino Board of Supervisors in June of 1991, and Supplemental Environmental Impact Report and Initial Study/Addendum certified by the City of Rancho Cucamonga on October 26, 1999, and August 1, 2001, respectively, and does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in that Environmental Impact Report, Supplemental Environmental Impact Report, and Initial Study/Addendum VARIANCE DRC2003-01187 -YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, L P - A request to allow up to an 11-foot combination freestanding/retaining wall height for grade differential purposes, where a maximum 6-foot wall height is permitted, along the westerly property line of Lot 10 of previously approved Tentative Tract Map SUBTT14493 in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan in the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development, located at the southwest corner of Banyan Street and Day Creek Boulevard -APN 0225-161-45 Related files Tentative Tract Map SUBTT14493 and Development Review DRC2003-01186 Staff has found the protect to be within the scope of the protect covered by a prior Environmental Impact Report certified by the County of San Bernardino Board of Supervisors in June of 1991, and Supplemental Environmental Impact Report and Initial Study/Addendum certified by the City of Rancho Cucamonga on October 26, 1999, and August 1, 2001, respectively, and does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in that Environmental Impact Report, Supplemental Environmental Impact Report, and Initial Study/Addendum MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2004-00322 -YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, L P - A request- to allow up to an 8-foot high wall for sound attenuation purposes along the northern and eastern boundaries of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT14493, where a maximum 6-foot wall height is permitted for a residential subdivision of 15 single-family lots on 4.39 acres of . land in the in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan in the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development, located at the southwest corner of Banyan Street and Day Creek Boulevard -APN 0225-161-45. Related Files• Tentative Tract Map SUBTT14493, Development Review DRC2003-01186 and Variance DRC2003-01187 Staff has found the protect to be within the scope of the ~,c 3q Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-01186, DRC2003-01187, AND DRC2004-00322 Page 2 protect covered by a prior Environmental Impact Report certified by the County of San Bernardino Board of Supervisors in June of 1991, and Supplemental Environmental Impact Report and Initial Study/Addendum certified by the City of Rancho Cucamonga on October 26, 1999, and August 1, 2001, respectively, and does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in that Environmental Impact Report, Supplemental Environmental Impact Report, and Initial Study/Addendum Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Young Califorrna Homes 6210 Stoneridge Mall Road, Swte 200 Pleasanton, CA 94588 5. General Plan Designation: Low Density Residential 6. Zoning: Low (2-4 dwelling units per acre) 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The site is located at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Banyan Street The protect site was rough graded when the Rancho Etiwanda area was mass graded and infrastructure was installed The site is bordered by a subdivision under construction to the west, Banyan Street to the north, Day Creek Boulevard to the east, and recently-constructed single-family homes to the south The site slopes to the south and no urnque physical characteristics are evident on the site 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Donald Granger, Assistant Planner (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required: None ANALYSIS: The Development Agreement for the Rancho Etiwanda area provides fora 15-lot single-family subdvision for the southwest corner of Banyan Street and Day Creek Boulevard The Site Plan and bwlding elevations for proposed Development Review DRC2003-01186 are in substantial compliance for previously approved Tentative Tract Map SUBTT14493 and the approved design gwdelines indicated in the Development Agreement for the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development. The protect wdl be required to implement all pertinent mitigation measures adopted in the Master Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development (formerly the University/Crest Planned Development) as covered by the Environmental Impact • Report and Subsequent Environmental Impact Report, as certified by the County of San Bernardino, and Initial Study/Addendum, as certified by the City of Rancho Cucamonga V rC I Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-01186, DRC2003-01187, AND DRC2004-00322 Page 3 Mitigation measure No 101 for the Final EIR and Supplemental EIR for the University/Crest Protect regwres that acoustical studies be prepared to assess noise levels for subsequent tracts within the University/Crest Protect area In accordance with this regwrement, a noise study was completed by Mestre Greve Associates for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT14493 (March 16, 2004) The noise study concluded that exterior living areas would be exposed to noise levels exceeding City standards The sound study evaluated the sound of levels of traffic from Day Creek Boulevard, Banyan Street, and the 210 Freeway Additionally, the sound study recorded early morning (5 30 a m to 9 a m) noise measurements from heavy trucks traveling from the Hanson Aggregate processing facility located northwest of the protect site The study recommended noise barriers and special construction techniques to reduce noise to acceptable levels Specifically, the study recommended constructing a 6-foot high sound wall along the perimeter of Lots 1 through 6, a 7-foot high sound wall along the perimeter of Lot 7, and an 8-foot high sound wall along the perimeter of Lots 8 through 10 to mitigate sound levels from Day Creek Boulevard and Banyan Street Sound walls, in accordance with the height recommendations of the sound study, are proposed as conditions of approval for Development Review DRC2003-01186 In accordance with the condition of approval for Mitigation measure No 101 for the Final EIR and Supplemental EIR for the University/Crest protect regwring that detailed indoor noise analysis for house product be performed, an interior noise study was completed by Mestre Greve Associates (March 16, 2004) The detailed interior noise analysis concluded that standard construction practices (tile roofs, insulation in the stud cavities, Yz-inch drywall, etc ) would prowde adequate exterior to interior sound attenuation for Plans 2 and 4 The remaining Plans 3 and 5 will regwre operable windows to be upgraded to an Exterior Wall Noise Rating Scale of 26 The required window upgrades for Plans 3 and 5, on specific lots, in accordance with the recommendations of the sound study, have been included in the proposed conditions of approval for the protect The sound study performed by Mestre Greve Associates utilized the SOUND32 model (March 16, 2004) Consistent with the City of Rancho Cucamonga protocol, the sound study completed by Mestre Greve Associates was evaluated by an independent third party, Marlund Hale, P.E , PhD The evaluation of the independent third party concurred with the sound analysis and the corresponding sound wall mitigation measures recommended by Mestre Greve Associates ~I~~I Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-01186, DRC2003-01187, AND DRC2004-00322 Page 4 DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation (X) I find that although the proposed protect could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed protect Donald Granger Assistant Planner May 12, 2004 EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D) The effects identified above for this protect were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (X) Environmental Impact Report for Unversity/Crest Planned Development (State Clearinghouse No 88082915) (Certified June 1991) (X) Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for Revised Urnversity protect (State Clearinghouse No 98121091) (Certified October 26, 1999) (X) Initial Study/Addendum for Revised University Protect (Certified August 1, 2001) (X) Noise Analysis for Tentative Tract 14493 _ Mestre Greve Associates (March 16, 2004) (X) Third Party Review of Noise Analysis for Tentative Tract 14493 Marlund Hale, Ph D, P E (May 8, 2004) a, c ~a i • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-01186, DRC2003-01187, AND DRC2004-00322 Page 5 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the protect described in this Initial Study I acknowledge that I have read this Irntial Study and the proposed mitigation measures Further, I have revised the protect plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur Signature Pnnt Name and Title Date l ~ 0 ~,c 4~ RESOLUTION NO 04-82 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO DRC2003-01186, THE DESIGN REVIEW OF 15 SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT14493 ON 4 39 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN IN THE RANCHO ETIWANDA PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD AND BANYAN STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0225-161-45 A Recitals 1 Young California Homes, L P filed an application for the approval of Development Review No DRC2003-01186, as descnbed in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 14th day of July 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date 3 All legal preregwsites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 -This Commission hereby speafically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and coned 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referencedmeeting onJuly 14, 2004, including wntten and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to property located at the'southwest comer of Day Creek Boulevard and Banyan Street with a street frontage of approximately 289 feet along Day Creek Boulevard and a street frontage of approximately 658 feet along Banyan Street, and b The property to the north of the subtect site is vacant and is zoned Low Residential, the property to the south is developed with single-family residences zoned Low Residential, the property to the east ~s developed with single-family residences and is zoned Low Residential, the property to west is developed with single-family residences and is zoned Low Residential, and c The protect site has a density of 3 42 dwelling units to the acre, which is within the permitted density range of the Low Residential Distnct, and d The protect site is located on previously approved Tentative Tract Map SUBTT14493, approved by the County of San Bernardino on October 26, 1999, and consists of 15 lots, and ~r~ l I PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-82 DRC2003-01186 -YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, L P July 14, 2004 Page 2 e The project falls within the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development, which inGuded a conceptual layout fora 15 lot single-faintly development at this location, and f The project meets or exceeds all applicable technical regwrements and design guidelines of the Rancho Etrvvanda Development Agreement and the Development Code 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a The proposed protect is consistent with the ob~edives of the General Plan, and b The proposed use is in accord with the obtectrves of the Development Code and the purposes of the distract in which the site is located, and c The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code, and d The proposed use, together wrath the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or matenally intunous to properties or improvements in the vicinity 4 An Environmental Impact Report (State Cleannghouse No 8808291) was prepared and certified by the County of San Bemardmo as a Master Environmental Impact Report for the University/Crest Planned Development The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) provides that once a Master Environmental Impact Report has been certified, no further Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration is regwred for subsequent protects within the scope of the Master Environmental Impact Report On October 26, 1999, the County of San Bemardmo Board of Supervisors certified a supplement to the Environmental Impact Report (State Cleannghouse No 98121091) because of a revision to the University/Crest Planned Development In August 1999, the City of Rancho Cucamonga prepared an Addendum to_ address issues assouated with the adoption of the Rancho Etiwanda Development Agreement The Addendum identfied no substanLal changes in the protect that would require a mator revision to the previous Environmental Impact Report Based upon the facts and information contained in the certified Environmental Impact Report, together wrath all wntten and oral reports, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect vwll have a significant effect upon the environment a There have not been substantial changes in the protect that require mayor revisions to the previous Environmental Impact Report because of no new significant environmental effects or substantial increase in the seventy of the previously identified significant effects b There have not been substantial changes wrath respect to the Grcumstances under which the protect is undertaken, which will regwre mator revisions to the previous Environmental Impact Report because of the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the seventy of previously identified significant effects c There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the Environmental Impact Report was certified as complete, that shows any of the following 1) the protect wtll have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Environmental Impact Report, b,C ~5 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-82 DRC2003-01186 -YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, L P July 14, 2004 Page 3 2) significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous Environmental Impact Report, 3) mitigation measures or altematrves previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the protect but the protect proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative, or 4) mitigation measures or alternatives, which are considerably different from those analyzed in the final Environmental Impact Report, would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents declme to adopt the mitigation measure or altematrve 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subted to each and every conddion set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Division 1) Where slope conditions regwre retaining walls to achieve 15 feet of usable rear yard area, provide a logical transition to allow access onto slopes for maintenance purposes, such as stairs, ramps, etc Final design shall be to the satisfaction of the City Planner, pnor to issuance of grading permits 2) Provide a 3-foot minimum landscape area between back of sidewalk and block walls on all comer lots 3) As requred per the Intenor Noise Analysis for the protect site, a 6-foot high sound wall along the penmeter of Lots 1 through 6, a 7-foot high sound wall along the penmeter of Lot 7, and an 8-foot high sound wall along the penmeter of Lots 8 through 10 shall be constructed 4) As required per the Intenor Noise Analysis for the protect site, Plan 3 on Lot 7 and Plan 5 on Lot 8 shall have operable windows v~nth an Extenor Wall Noise Rating Scale of 26 Plans submitted for plan check shall indicate the required window ratings 5) The maintenance responsibilities of the 5-foot wide pnvate drainage easement on Lots 11-15 shall be noted on the title report documents 6) A stepped pedestnan access way shall be provided on Lots 11 through 15 leading from the house pads to the drainage easement for maintenance purposes 7) The Developer shall provide wntten notice, in the form of a disclosure, to each prospective buyer of the Fourth Street Rock Crushing Facility located northwest of the protect site The disclosure shall inform the homebuyer of the use of Banyan Street and Day Creek Boulevard as a truck route to and from the rock crushing facility and the occurrence of truck traffic noise 8) The decks shall be a standard feature, not an option, for all lots that have reverse frontage on Banyan Street and Day Creek Boulevard The decks shall have venation inGuding, but not limited too, venation in ~t~~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-82 DRC2003-01186 -YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, L P July 14, 2004 Page 4 the railing, deck sizes, matenals, and supporting posts Final design of the decks shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval dunng the plan check process 9) Decorative pavement shall be provided on the dnveways Decorative dnveways shall have vanation throughout the subdivision 10) Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a matenal more durable than wood gates Acceptable matenals inGude, but are not limited to, wrought iron and plastic 11) The protect will be developed according to the approved Site Plan and corresponding Extenor and Intenor Noise Analysis for the protect site, adhenng to all requirements of the Intenor Noise Analysis Replotting of the houses will regwre additional intenor noise analysis to be performed in order to demonstrate that the houses will meet the City's Intenor Noise Standards 12) Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real or native fieldstone Other forms of stone may be manufactured products 13) All penmeter walls, and all walls exposed to public view shall be decorative Penmeterwalls fronting Day Creek Boulevard and Banyan Street shall adhere to the approved wall design and matenals palette for Day Creek Boulevard, Banyan Street, and Rancho Etiwanda, including, but not limited to, raver rock pilasiers Enaineenng Division 1) All proposed internal street improvements to be in accordance wrath "Local Residential" standards, inGuding but not limited to the following a) Provide curb and gutter, sidewalk, street trees and asphalt pavement, as regwred b) Provide 5800 Lumen HPSV streetlights c) Provde traffic stnping and signage, as regwred 2) Provide an adequate easement width to accommodate a 5-foot v~nde drainage fatality (1 percent minimum slope) along the southern protect boundary Existing block wall adtacent to the proposed drainage fatalily shall not have any weep holes The proposed drainage facility shall drain to an inlet box and parkway drain per City standards Provide access for maintenance purposes on each lot Side yard fentang shall not block flows in the drainage facility 3) Homeowner access to and maintenance responsibilities of the pnvate drainage faality shall be provided for by deeds for Lots 11-15, and shall be recorded concurrently with the final map ~iC ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-82 DRC2003-01186 -YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, L P July 14, 2004 Page 5 4) Provide sidewalk easement on both sides of Blue Spruce Dnve and Cedar Hdl Place 5) Owner of Lot 1 shall maintain the proposed side yard of said lot along Rocking Horse Place Provide mow stnps to separate public and pnvate maintenance areas Side yard wall shall be set back from Blue Spruce Dnve as far as possible to minimize wall-adjacent sidewalk and leave this area visible to the homeowner 6) Parkways shall slope at 2 percent from the top of curb to 1-foot behind the sidewalk along all street frontages 7) Street trees along Rocking Horse Place shall be installed per City Drav~nng No 1813 8) Pnor to building permit issuance, revise existing LMD plans, City Drawing No 1803-L, as regwred by the City Engineer Revised plans shall show new trail and planting area locations Adtust trail fencing and planting locations for intersection lines of sight 9) The final map for Tract 14493 shall be approved and recorded pnor to the issuance of budding penmts Environmental Mtigation 1) The applicant shall implement all pertinent mitigation measures adopted in the Master Environmental Impact Report for the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development (formerly the University/Crest Planned Development) as covered by the Environmental Impact Report and Subsequent Environmental Impact Report, as certified by the County of San Bemardmo, and Initial Study/Addendum as certified by the City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF JULY 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY MaGas, Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary btG~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-82 DRC2003-01186 -YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, L P July 14, 2004 Page 6 I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of July 2004, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS ~~C ~ 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-01186 SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FOR 15 LOTS APPLICANT: YOUND CALIFORNIA HOMES, L P LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD AND BANYAN STREET ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS. ~. General Requirements 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorneys fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe regwred by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 04-82, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not regwred to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect B. Time Limits Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or DevelopmenUDesign Review approval shall expue if bwlding permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations SC-7 -04 ~ i \planning\final\pingcomm\dre2003-01186cond7-14 doc V t ~ ~ O Completion Date -/-/- / / / / _/_/_ Protect No DRC2003-01166 Completion Date 2 Prior to any use of the prolect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions ~_/_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner ~ 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and _/_/_ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Diwsion to show compliance The bwldings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/_/_ submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bulding permits 5 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/_/_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all _/~_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance 7 If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units with -1~- all receptacles shielded from public view 8 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be _/_/_ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For single- family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 9 All bulding numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, _/_/_ including proper illumination ert the ro d b tl t ~ / 10 y p p aine y y main All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanen _ homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape owner , maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of bulding permits 11 The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all _/_/_ lots for City Planner and City Engineer approval, including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, speaal street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing 12 Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the prolect perimeter If a double wall _/_/_ condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property ' s owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the project perimeter 13 Construct block walls between homes (i a ,along interior side and rear property lines), rather than _/_/_ wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency 14 Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood _/_/_ gates Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC 15 For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry _/_/_ 16 Slope fencing along side property lines may be wrought iron or black plastic coated chain link to _/_/_ maintain an open feeling and enhance views SC-1-04 i \planning\final\pingcomm\dre2003-01186cond7-14 doc 2 g f C, ;J Protect No DRC2003-01186 Completion Date 17 On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk The . 5-foot wall/fence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and irrigation in addition to the regwred street trees Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits The parkway landscaping including trees, shrubs, ground covers and irrigation shall be maintained by the property owner The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the parkway maintenance requirement, in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property 18 Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock Other stone veneers may be manufactured products D. Building Design All roof appurtenances, including au conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or protections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adtacent properties and streets as regwred by the Planning Division Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the bulding design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner Details shall be included in budding plans E. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) Multiple car garage driveways shall be tapered down to a standard two-car width at street F. Landscaping 1 - A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting regwred by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 3 All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting regwred by this section shall rnclude a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 4 For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Division to determine that they are in satisfactory condition 5 Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be regwred per the Development Code This requrement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting 6 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the regwred landscape plans and shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Division SC-1-04 / / / / _/~_ / / / / -/-/- / / / / / / / / i \planning\final\pingcomm\dre2003-01186cond7-14 doc 3 ~lv~~ Project No DRC2003-01186 Comolehon Date Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this protect area shall be continuously maintained by the developer All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division G. Environmental 1 The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Fourth Street Rock Crusher protect in a standard format as determined by the Ctty Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property 2 The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the City Adopted Special Studies Zone for the Red Hill Fault, in a standard format as determined bythe City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property 3 The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the 210 Freeway in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property 4 A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report 5 The applicant shall submit certification from an acoustical engineer that all recommendations of the acoustical report were implemented in construction, including measurements of interior and exterior noise levels to document compliance with City standards Certification shall be submitted to the Building & Safety Division priorto final occupancy release of the affected homes 6 Mitigation measures are required for the protect The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $719 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory pertormance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forteit H. Other Agencies The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits APPLICANT SHALL CONTACTTHE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE• ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following SC-1-04 4 ~ C53 i \planning\final\pingcomm\dre2003-01186cond7-14 doc I / / _/-/ _/~_ _/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- ~-/ / / _/_/~ Project No DRC2003-01186 a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single Itne diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Division Protect Number (i e , SUBTT #, SUBTPM#, DRC #) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and W orkers' Compensation coverage to the Ctty prior to permit issuance 4 Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls 5 Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the Bwlding and Safety Diwsion 6 Developers wishing to participate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) can contact the Bwlding and Safety Division staff for information and submittal requirements ~J. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be marked with the protect file number (i e , DRC2001-00001) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential protect or mator addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees Applicant shall prowde a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division prior to permit issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tracUparcel map recordation and prior to issuance of building permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays K. New Structures Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fue-resistiveness 2 Provide compliance with the California Building Cade for requred occupancy separations SC-1-04 Comoletion Date / / / / / / / / _/-/- -/-/- -/~- -/-/- -/-/- / / -/-/- 5 i \planning\final\pingcomm\dre2003-01186cond7-14 doc G Protect Na DRC2003-01186 Comolet~on Date 3 Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions _/-/- i ng L. Grad 1 Grading of the subtect property shall be in accordance with California Building Code, City Grading -/-/- Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to ~-/- perform such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the _/~_ ttme of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, -/-/_ submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of bwiding permits 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is regwred for all new construction protects and for -/~- existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Cron Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: M. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, -/-/~ community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and publtc drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map Pnvate easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map 2 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from -/-/- street centerline) 40 total feet on Banvan Street (50 feet at rioht turn lane) -/-/- Varies total feet on Dav Creek Boulevard -/-/- 3 Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards -/-/- 4 Pnvate drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or -/-/- noted on the final map 5 All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall bequit-claimed or delineated on the -/-/- final map 6 Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be -/-/- dedicated to the City N. Street Improvements 1 All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped -/~_ areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees • SC-1-04 i \planning\final\pingcomm\dre2003-01186cond7-14 doc 8 ~t~~~ Protect No DRC2003-01186 Comolehon Date . 2 Pursuant to Clty Council Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all Improvements requlred by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except that in developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of Improvements as requlred by conditions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all Improvements required by these conditions of approval of development 3 Construct the following perimeter street Improvements including, but not limited to Street Nama Curb 8 Gutter AC Pvmt Side- walk Dnve Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Trail Other Banyan Street (e) X Day Creek Boulevard (e) Notes (a) Median island Includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this Item (e) Landscape per LMD Plans. 1803-L 4 Improvement Plans and Construction a Street Improvement plans, Including street trees, street lights, and Intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the CIty Engineer Security shall be . posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being performed In public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal condwt, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified SC-1-04 Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the Clty Engineer Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the Clty Engineer / / I / / / I / / / / / / / / I r ~ rL~~ i \planning\final\pingcomm\dre2003-01186cond7-14 doc Protect No DRC2003-01186 ComoleLOn Date g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be Installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the Clty Planner prior to submittal for first plan check 5 Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be Installed per City Standards In accordance with the City's street tree program 6 Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans Street improvement plans shall Include a line Item within the construction legend stating "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typically sheet 1) ° Where public landscape plans are required, tree Installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape Improvement plans The Clty Engineer reserves the right to adtust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional Information, contact the Protect Engineer Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Min Grow Space Spacing Size BANYAN STREET EUCALYPTUS SPOTTED GUM B' 30' O C s GAL FORMERLY SUMMIT MACULATA OR IF AVENUE W/O WINDROW ETIWANDA S/SIDE CRAPE MYRTLE 3' REQUIRED 2q• gOX P A 8' OR GREATER t-,gGERSTROEMIA HYBRID- B' O C P A LESS THAN 8' INDICA LAVENDAR 20' O C 'MUSKOGEE' DAY CREEK BLVD WASHINGTONIA MEXICAN FAN PALM 4' 25' O C 16' MIN STREET TREE ROBUSTA STAGGERED B T H , OR MIN OF 5' AWAY ROWS ON MATCH EST FROM STREET LIGHT ALTERNATE HEIGHTS SIDES OF WALK STREET TREE NCN 4' 25' O C 15 GAL PYRUS CALLERYANA STAGGERED MATCHED 'ARISTROCRAT' ROWS ON STANDARDS ALTERNATE SIDES OF WALK INFORMAL Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic sods report shall be furnished to the City inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfdl Boll amendments, as determined by the Clty Inspector 3) All street trees are subtect to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Division 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the Clty Engineer for conformance with adopted policy On collector or larger streets, Imes of sight shall be plotted for all protect Intersections, including driveways Local residential street Intersections and commercial or Industrial driveways may have Imes of sight plotted as required O. Public Maintenance Areas A separate set of landscape and Irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall be submitted to the Clty Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance SC-1-04 / / / / / / • _~-~- / / _/_/~ 8 I \planning\final\pingcomm\dre2003-01186cond7-14 doc 61~' ~~' Protect No DRC2003-01186 Complellon Date of building permits, whichever occurs first The following landscaped parkways, medians, paseos, easements, trails or other areas shall be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance . District Dav Creek Boulevard Banvan Street 2 Public landscape areas are required to incorporate substantial areas (40%) of mortared cobble or _/_/_ other acceptable non-vrigated surtaces 3 A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting _/_/_ Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior tc final map approval or issuance of bulding permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer 4 All requued public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the _/_/_ developer until accepted by the City 5 Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective ~_/_ Beautification Master Plan Dav Creek Boulevard P. Drainage and Flood Control 1 A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map _/_/_ approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first All drainage facilities shall be installed as requred by the City Engineer 2 Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surtace drainage entering the _/_/_ property from adjacent areas Q. Uti lities 1 Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, _/_/_ • electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as regwred 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary _/-/- 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the ~_/_ Cucamonga County W ater District (CCW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CCW D is regwred prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days pnor to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential protects 4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved _/_/_ Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them R. Ge neral Requirements and Approvals 1 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all _/_J- new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to bulding permit issuance if no map is involved • SC-1-04 i ~planning\final~pingcomm\dre2003-01186cond7-14 doc I~ I~' CJ Q Protect No DRC2003-07186 Comoletion Date 2 Prior to the Issuance of building permits, a Dtversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall _/_/_ be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from • landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engmeenng Division when the first bwldmg permit application is submitted to Bwldmg and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Dtwsion within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition protect APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: S. Security Hardware 1 A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors -/-/- 2 One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors If windows are wtthtn _/_/_ 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used 3 All garage or rolling doors shall have sitde bolts or some type of secondary locking devices _/~_ T. Windows 1 All sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be lifted _/_/_ from frame or track in any manner U. Building Numbering 1 Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime _/_/ visibility APPLICANT SHALL CONTACTTHE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED SC-1-04 10 i \planning\final\pingcomm\dre2003-01186cond7-14 doc T1,' ~ 5C~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT STANDARD CONDITIONS March 11, 2004 Young Homes Monterra Tract # 14493 (15) SFR tract infill DRC2003-01186 Fees must be paid prior to the issuance of Completeness by FCS. Building permits for the construction of the project will not be issue and until the streets are paved to Banyan St. and Day Creek Blvd. Building permits will not be issued without approved water plans from CCWD and FCS. THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT- STANDARD CONDITIONS & REQUIREMENTS - FSC-1 General Requirements for Public and Private Water Supply Water (fire) plans must be approved by RCFPD and CCWD pnor to permit issuance General Guidance for Fire Hydrants. The following provides general guidance for the spaang and location of fire hydrants Remember these are the maximum permitted distances between fire hydrants a The maximum distance between fire hydrants inmulti-family residential is 400-feet No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 200-feet from an approved fue hydrant For cul-de- sacs the distance shall not exceed 150-feet b The maximum distance between fire hydrants in single-family residential protects is 500-feet No portion of the exterior wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 250-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs the distance shall not exceed 200 tt c For single-family residential protects in the designated Hazardous Fire Area the maximum distance between fire hydrants is 400-feet No portion of the exterior wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 200-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs the distance shall not exceed 150 ft d Fire hydrants are to be located 1 At the entrance(s) to a protect from the existing public roadways This includes subdivisions and industrial parks 2 At intersections f j, c, l>,O 3 On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible 4 As requred by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs 5 The location of fue hydrants is based upon the operational needs of the Fire District to control a Ere 6 Fire hydrants shall be located a minimum of 40 feet from any building 2 Mrnrmum Fire Flow: The required fire flow for this protect is 1500gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as amended 3 Hydrants Used to Supply Fire Flow. Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed protect may be used to provide the requred fire flow subtect to Fire District review and approval Private fire hydrants on adtacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow 4 Show Existing Fire Hydrants and Mains Existing fire hydrants and mains within 600-feet of the protect shall be shown on the water plan submitted for review and approval Include main size FSC-2 Private (On-Site) Water and/or Fire Sprinkler Underground Plans for Fire Protection 1 Number of Fire Hydrants Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow or fraction thereof, subtect to standard spacing and distribution regwrements FSC-4 Frre District Srte Access- Technical Comments 1 Access Roadways Defined: Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets, and highways, as well as private roads, streets, drive aisles and designated fire lanes 2 Restrrcted Residential Access Mrtrgation• The installation of gates and restricted access to residential developments may necessitate installation of approved automatic fve sprinkler systems This condition applies to protects in the designated Hazardous Fire Area, when the Fire District determines that gates, other means of restricting access or conditions delaying response exists Contact the Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 3 Restrrcted Residential Access Gated or access for all residential development shall comply with the following a All automatic gates shall be provided with a Fue District approved, compatible traffic pre- emption device Approved devices are available from Opticom (3M) and Tomar Electronics Devices shall be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions and specrfications b A Knox Rapid Entry System Key Box rs regwred to be installed adtacerit to each gate in a Fire District approved location The box shall be mounted where it is clearly visible and access is unobstructed c Vehicle access gates shall be provided with an approved Fire District Knox Key Switch d The key switch shall be located immediately adtacent to the Knox Box for use in the event that the traffic pre-emption device fails to operate e The gate shall remain in the open position for not less than 20-minutes and shall automatically reset Contact Bwldin and Safet /Fire Construction Services 909 477-2713 for ins ection I n l.l~ C~ • FSC-5 Plan Submittal Regwred Nonce Required plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 2000/2001 Bwlding, Fire, Mechanical, and Plumbing Codes, 1999 Electrical Code, Health and Safety Code, Public Resources Code, and RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD39, Gwdelines and Standards PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS- Building permits will not be issued until the water (fire) plans are submitted and approved by CCWD and Fire Construction Services Complete the following: 1 Pnvate/On-site Fire Hydrants Prior to the issuance of any bulding permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District standards 2. Private Fire Hydrants/On-site Installation All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable pnor to delivering any combustible bulding materials on-site (i a ,lumber, roofing materials, etc) A representative of Fire Construction Services shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The builder/developer shall submit final test and inspection report to the Fire Safety Division 3 Public Fve Hydrants Prior to issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and the Water District On the plan show ail existing fve hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the protect 4 Public Installation. All regwred public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable prior to delivering any combustible bulding materials on-site (i a ,lumber, roofing materials, etc) Water District personnel shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The builder/developer shall submit a copy of the Water District inspection report to the Fue Safety Diwsion Contact Water District to schedule testing PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION- Complete the following: 1 Pnvate Fire Hydrants- Final Acceptance: For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional test of the on-site fire hydrants shall be conducted by the builder/developer in the presence of the Water District or Fire Construction Services, as appropriate The bwlder/developer shall submit the final test report to the Fire Safety Division 2 Construction Access: Fire District access, a minimum 26-feet in width and 14-feet, 6-inches minimum clear height shall be provided These minimum clearances shall be maintained free and clear of any obstructions at all times, in accordance with Fire District Standards Contact the Fve Safety Diwsion (909)477-2770 3 Phased Construction• Each phase shall be provided with approved Fire District access roadways Dead-end roadways shall not exceed the maximum permitted by the Fire Code or Fire District standards ~ Ic,c~a RESOLUTION NO 04-83 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VARIANCE DRC2003-01187, A REQUEST TO ALLOW UP TO AN 8 5 FOOT COMBINATION FREESTANDING/RETAINING WALL HEIGHT FOR GRADE DIFFERENTIAL PURPOSES, ALONG THE SOUTHERLY PROPERTY LINE OF LOT 10 OF PREVIOUSLY APPROVED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT14493 IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN IN THE RANCHO ETIWANDA PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BANYAN STREET AND DAY CREEK BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0225-161-45 A Rentals 1 Young California Homes, L P filed an application for the issuance of Vanance DCR2003-01187, as descnbed in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Vanance request is referred to as "the application " 2 On July 14, 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and concluded said heanng on that date 3 All legal preregwsites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved bythe Plamm~g Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng on July 14, 2004, including wntten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby speGfically finds as follows a The application applies to Tentative Tract Map SUBTT14493, a subdivision located at the southwest comer of Day Creek Boulevard and Banyan Street, which has a significant north to south grade differential between the adtacent properties, and b The property to the north of the subject sde is vacant and is zoned Low Residential, the property to the south is developed with single-family residences zoned Low Residential, the property to the east is developed with single-family residences and is zoned Low Residential, the property to west is developed with single-family residences and is zoned Low Residential, and c The application applies to Tentative Tract Map SUBTT14493, a subdivision that was previously approved by the County of San Bernardino for 15 single-family lots, and d The Vanance request is to increase the mawmum allowable wall height from 6 feet to 8 5 feet, and L11~ ~J PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-83 VARIANCE DRC2003-01187 -YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, L P July 14, 2004 Page 2 e Literal enforcement of the wall height limit would cause a physical hardship and practical difficultly for development of the property because of the presence of a grade differential that was created when the adjacent subdivision was graded Enforcement of the wall height limit would necessitate a 2 1 downslope condition at the property line, which is undesirable for maintenance purposes since it would be difficult to maintain by the upslope property owner and contrary the Design Pollees of the Planning Commission, and f There are exceptional circumstances applicable to the subtect property that do not apply to a ma~onty of other properties in the immediate surrounding area because of the presence of an adjacent lot (Lot 55 of Tentative Tract SUBTT14493-1) that is part of a previously approved subdivision The adtacent lot (Lot 55 of Tentative Tract SUBTT 14493-1) has pad elevation that is several feet lower than the subtect property (Lot of 10 of Tentative Tract SUBTT14493), thereby creating exceptional ercumstances with regard to achieving an adequate level of side yard pnvacy between the two lots and the avoidance of a downslope maintenance condition on Lot 55 of Tentative Tract 14493, and g Literal enforcement of the wall height limit would depnve the applicant of development entoyed by other properties in the Low Residential Distnct by requinng the applicant to significantly alter the proposed design of the subdivision Alternative design and construction methods are not feasible for the subtect property and have not been required of other properties in the Low Residential Distnct within the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development, and h The granting of the Vanance will not constitute a special pnvilege inconsistent vwth the limitations on other properties in the same zone, in that, Vanances for wall heights because of grade differential purposes between Swo lots have been granted for other subdivisions, and i Granting of the Vanance will not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare, but conversely, will promote public safety and welfare by providing adequate pnvacy between the side yards of two single-family dwelling units and enable the maintenance of pnvate yards by avoiding the construction of a downslope maintenance area 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a That stnct or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulations would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent wdh the obtectives of the Development Code, and b That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same distnct, and c That stnct or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specfiied regulation would depnve the applicant of pnvileges entoyed by the owners of other properties in the same distnct, and d That the granting of the Vanance will not constitute a grant of special pnvilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same distnct, and 81 ~- ~ y" PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-83 VARIANCE DRC2003-01187 -YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, L P July 14, 2004 Page 3 e That the granting of the Vanance will not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or matenally inlunous to properties or improvements in the vicinity 4 An Environmental Impact Report (State Cleannghouse No 8806291) was prepared and certified by the County of San Bernardino as a Master Environmental Impact Report for the University/Crest Planned Development The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) provides that once a Master EIR Environmental Impact Report has been certified, no further Environmental Impact Report or Negative DeGaration is regwred for subsequent protects within the scope of the Master Environmental Impact Report On October 26, 1999, the County of San Bernardino Board of Supervisors certified a supplement to the Environmental Impact Report (State Cleannghouse No 98121091), because of a revision to the Development Plan University/Crest Planned Development In August 1999, the City of Rancho Cucamonga prepared an Addendum to address issues associated with the adoption of the Rancho Etiwanda Development Agreement The Addendum identified no substantial changes in the protect that would require a major rewsron to the previous Environmental Impact Report Based upon the facts and infornation contained in the certified Environmental Impact Report, together vnth all wntten and oral reports, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon the environment a There have not been substantial changes in the project that require major revisions to the previous Environmental Impact Report because of no new significant environmental effects or substantial increase in the seventy of the previously identified significant effects b There have not been substantial changes vnth respect to the circumstances under which the protect is undertaken, which will requre mator revisions to the previous Environmental Impact Report because of the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the seventy of previously identified significant effects c There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known, v~nth the exercise of reasonable diligence at the trine the Environmental Impact Report was certified as complete, that shows any of the following 1) the project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Environmental Impact Report, 2) significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous Environmental Impact Report, 3) mitigation measures or alternatives prewouslyfound not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project but the pro/ect proponents decline to adopt the mtigation measure or alternative, or 4) mitigation measures or alternatives, which are considerably different from those analyzed in the final Environmental Impact Report, would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative 5 Based upon the findings and contusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition set forth below 1) Vanance approval shall expire if bwlding permits are not issued within five years from the date of approval . 2) All penmeter walls, and all walls exposed to public view shall be decorative Penmeter walls fronting Day Creek Boulevard and Banyan Street shall adhere to the approved wall design and matenals palette d.J f ~ t r PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-83 VARIANCE DRC2003-01187 -YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, L P July 14, 2004 Page 4 for Day Creek Boulevard, Banyan Street, and Rancho Etiwanda, including, but not limited to, nver rock plasters 3) All applicable Conditions of Approval per Resolution No 04-82 approving Development Review DRC2003-01186 shall apply The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF JULY 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Rich Macias, Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of July 2004, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS C~ ~1~~~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DRC2003-01187 SUBJECT: VARIANCE FOR ALL HEIGHT (LOT 10 OF TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT14493) APPLICANT: YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, L P LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD AND BANYAN STREET ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: ~. General Requirements 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the Clry, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or In the alternative, to rellnqulsh such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe regwred by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense In the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 04-83, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved In the construction/grading activities and are not regwred to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect B. Time Limits Variance approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development The site shall be developed and maintained In accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file In the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations SC-1-04 Completion Date -/-/- / / ~~- ~_/ i \planning\final\pingcomm\dre2003-01187cond7-14 doc ~ t l~ ~+' Pro)ect No DRC2003-01187 Comoletion Date 2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditicns ~_/_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner 3 Revised site plans and bulding elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/_/ submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bwlding permits 4 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/_/_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 5 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all _/_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Spec)fic Plans )n effect at the time of building permit issuance D. Landscaping 1 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, the _/_/_ design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division SC-1-04 2 i \planning\final\pingcomm\dre2003-01187cond7-14 doc 1]..'C ~g T H E C I T Y O F R A N C h O C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE July 14, 2004 1 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, Clty Planner BY Brent Le Count, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003-01160 - FANCHER DEVELOPMENT - A request to develop a 6,502 square foot P F Chang's restaurant with bar with two patio areas totaling 1,121 square feet in the Mixed Use District of the Victoria Gardens Regional Center, located on the east side of Day Creek Boulevard, north of Foothill Boulevard - APN 0227-201-35 This action is within the scope of the protect reviewed In an Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No 20010301028) prepared for Development Agreement 01-02, Victoria Community Plan Amendment 01-01, and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTT15716 that was certified by the Clty Council on February 20, 2002, and no additional environmental review for the discretionary actions mentioned In this notice Is required pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166 BACKGROUND The protect Is located within Phase 1 of the Victoria Gardens Regional Center The design review for the center was approved by the Planning Commission In November of 2002 P F Chang's Is subtect to its own independent review through the Conditional Use Permit because the restaurant building design was not previously approved and includes service of alcoholic beverages in a bar format PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Surrounding Land Use and Zoning The site Is a remote pad development surrounded by a large parking field with various shops and restaurants and active open space elements of the Victoria Gardens Regional Center further east now under construction The Regional Center Is In the Mixed Use District in the Victoria Community Plan The "Regency" shopping center is planned to be developed to the west across Day Creek Boulevard and there are single- famlly homes under construction to the north of the site on both sides of Day Creek Boulevard B General Plan Desionations The site and surrounding area are designated Mixed Use per the General Plan C Site Characteristics The Victoria Gardens Center is under construction including much of the parking area that will surround P F Chang's Day Creek Boulevard is under construction to the west Access to the site will be provided via Day Creek Boulevard and South Mainstreet ITEM D PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2003-01160 - P F CHANG'S July 14, 2004 , Page 2 - D ParkinoCalculations The site is surrounded by a large parking field that is part of the overall Victoria Gardens center The overall center is parked at a ratio of 4 5 spaces per 1,000 square feet This parking ratio was arrived at as a result of a special parking study done for the Regional Center ANALYSIS A General The building will be located at the southeast corner of Day Creek Boulevard and South Mamstreet, thereby forming part of the entry statement to the South Mamstreet district The South Mamstreet district is intended to be the high fashion, trendy, and a very flashy section of the mall and the design of the P F Chang's restaurant, with its bold geometric shapes and colors, fits this theme well The north elevation of the budding wdl have a row of stone covered columns connected by a large wooden member A large, full size statue of a horse is placed at the main entrance to the budding at the southwest comer The service area is neatly tucked away on the east side of the budding well incorporated into the architecture A barrel roof structure wdl be covered with a standing seam metal roof Hours of operation are proposed to be 10 00 a m to 11 00 p m seven days a week with 25 employees on site at peak operating hours P F Chang's is expected to employ a total of 80 individuals B Design Review Committee The Committee (McPhail, Stewart, Fong) reviewed the protect on June 1, 2004 The Committee recommended approval subject to change out of the composite roof shingles proposed on a portion of the roof to another material because of design policy precluding the use of composition shingle and the Committee was not in favor of the appearance that the shingle conveyed The applicant chose to go with the standing seam metal roof at the Committee's direction C Gradino and Technical Review Committees The Technical and Grading Review Committees reviewed the protect on June 1, 2004 The Committees recommended approval RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-01160 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval Respectfully submitted, i Brad Bu er City Planner BB BLC\Is Attachments Exhibit "A" - Site Plan Exhibit "B" Exhibit "C" Exhibit "D" - Exhibit "E" - Exhibit "F" - Draft Resolu Grading Plan Landscape Plan . Elevations Renderings Design Review Committee Action Comments dated June 1, 2004 Lion of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-01160 ~a • Zo a J •° a~ ``w I'~ Q (n N 41 I eop I I ~ II I I ~ II I I I II k-1~ II I I ~ II I I I~ I I II I I ~ it I I u I I ( II I III I I ~ II E' I I II I I ~ II I I ~ II I I I II II II ICI, II I I II III II I I 1 II I` I ~ II I I I II I I ~ II I I 1 II I I I II I I II I I ; II I I p I I I II I I i II I I ~ II rl I I I I~ ~ i~ .~- ~~ . ~~_ A ivy \` ~~ 1 - ~-- z ~ u (O ~~ ~ ~ i II p~ p it I II ~ I I II ~ I I II k-I II ; I I II II I I I II ~ I I u'll II I I I II ~ I I II ~ I I II I= I II I I ~p ~ I I .II I I ~II-~ ICI ~ II ~ I I II ~ I I II I I I II ~ I I II 111 II I I I II I I II ~ I I II I I II I I I II ~I n ! I~ I I I r~~~ h it 11 II 4 II 4 II II II 4 II ~ p 3 II 0 &311 X3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~ --~ L-- __ III __ II --~ ~-- --~„ r--- --~I ~-- --~ ~-- ~II I`~ II I __~mr__ ---III--- -®~ _® I ~ Ise-a€ ~~ n ~-m~== ------ V r3dVJ5N+~7 ° • ~ _ I f-.e - N ~ ', - - ~.EI X3 II-,Il .4 .B~ ~ ~ ~ m . ` ~ 1 ~ _ - ~~ ~ ~ -- e a ~' II j I II ~ I ~ I•I i i ~~ ~ 13 lo- - - ~ '` --- ~_v~_ C ~ ~~~ ~ ® ZZ /J/®~, LG LJ1l ®_ ~® - -ail--- - --AIL- - II,I - --~,~-- - -~Ir-- - --II ~-- - -~ L-- ~ II II ~ - -~~T-- - --{III--- _ _~'~__ ~ ~~~-- III I _ _ ~III- - -~~r-- ~- -y~'`If--- I - _ _ r - T - ~ -- _ ~ + _~I~__ -- - -~~I- ~. •~ ~ I I i 1 ~~ ~ A ~~~ ~ ~~_ ~~~ ~ ~a~~ L3lllip Y BNN Ip -' - -. aadn3-Inoa ~3a~o •~ea -~ - ~ m ~ - ~n end - o~~3~ilNOw = _ _ i_ ~ - - BtlN X3 _ -~ ~`I J f LL L o I I Y ~lo r~Cr~ + I - ---~ ~~ ~~~1 r Z ~ I II ' II oo __ III ®--- I II II I ~ II 11 I I I ~® III ® a® I I' II I II 11 I I ~ ---~ r-- ~ ~ I II II ' III I ~~~J ® ~ --~ I--- _ f' I II I II I'I -® --"N {--- -71Ir-- I~ I 1 II I , II I I I ~~ ~,@ al ~,~`- ~ -- III - ---~I~ -- I II II II 11 I II 2 v~~ ~. -~ ~mr~ - ---~;r--- I I II ~ II ' I I II ~~d~ , @ - ~g e f'~a iii ~ w ~ - I I II I , II II I II aa~ r bra ~ ~ -~Ir-- I I~p II ~ I I __ ~ --~iF---- 1 I 11 I II a,~a ,~, ,a --~1~-- I I II I I II , yr~ .~,,d a f' I I II ~ I II f-I II a ~ ~ ~v~¢`;,v `'~~~ --~ ~--- J I II II ~ I II II I I~ '~~.~ ~;'~ ° z.~br'°~¢r ~ v IIII x3 1 tZ I I 1 II I II 1 I I II ~ a~ ~y ~ ~ m _ ~, ~ C7 ICI) II I I III ICI ~ -•~ I I III" - v t- - Q ° I~I~ II I I ~II~I~I ~I ~`~ Z~ ~'_~~,.~:~~ e~~~j ~ --~1I-- ~ ~I s ~ I I II ' , I II'I I i ~ ., jll ~ ~ --~I~L- c ~ ~ I I I II ~ I II I I I ~ ~~I c II ~ --~III~-- 1I 1 II I II 1 I_I ~ a ~-1 ` ~s --" 1 ~ Y I' p I I II 11 I , z o,.r I~r a ~~--- W I II II I ~ I II ~"°~ ~ - ~_~~ --~ ~-- a I I I II I I II I I I r; ~~ \o/ ,, ~I --VIII--- I I 1 II II ~ v II ~ I I i - ~g~ ~ II ry -- IIi~ -- ' iii 4 i II II I '; _ ~ io~~ ~~-~I~ --~Ir-- I I' II ' I II'I~ „' g~ ~~.~ od~~° -~va-NIF-- 1I I II I II I ~` I a ~ I ,'vim - ~- -- 1I 1 p I II , I ~ a ga ° I rP~r = _ ~ II ' 1 I ' g a v _1_ I I I~ f• I ~0 12~ 'e err y f I I , I ~~ ~ q'~i` r''"'~ tea{ I ~ ~~~ I I`~ kl l ~ .~ ~ - ~~I I~ I I I ' I I v b a ~ ~y `` v I I I~ I I ufre r a ~^ `r`r~2~ I ~ `~ br ~ ~/ ~ ~aoM eo surm ¢,~ a ~rL~+i~ a eaio ~ ~ ~ _ r ~~~~.~ _ ~ ey g xn~uas xa r ~ - - - ~ ---. --~•-._..- rr° - ---- __ -_ ,~, v Bz - - - ~ %311I U' 8 B W YJ K3 a ° =~ _ - .~ rr a ~r - - rt~ ror zr 2f .~ A ~s~ ~~ = abdn~~noa ~~~ao .yea ®.~-~ I m -u Y .~ , VyY+ CJ `„1 /C~1` ~5 ,- Q Z J ~ W Q U Z ® $ Q ® J ~- e T 1~ Fi O O F- (.~ Q Z U Z Q U 6 u .~. z ~o of ,< < t V ~~ _o o~ U U ~ > ee 1 ~*\t I~ . ti`, ~4 _{}, d ~'.F. CHANG'S CHINA BISTRO _____ VICiOR1A GARDENS RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA ~ • EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A3.1 +nT- i m Oi MPY 101N 11 foOJECi NO a ~9 i CRA~C'9N i ~~ =`t ~, EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS P.F. CHANG'S CHINA BISTRO VICTORIA GARDENS RANCHO CIIfAMON GA CA 1 1 I A3.2 ~]n.l ~ I 01 MAY 3001 PROIE01 N-in<10]] i S ~~ n ;~-~ P.F. CHANG'S CHINA BISTRO _ YICiORIA GARDENS 2ANCH0 CUCAMONGA GA NORTH ELEVATION W/ LANDSCAPING • A3.3 „~r=, ~~ ox AI AY ]OOa rowecr u; nt~sv J~ ~q \'` ~~ A4.1 P.F. CHANG'S CHINA BISTRO VICTORIA GARDENS RArvCNO CNCnMONGn On OT MAY 2n0+ , PROF Li NO 91b) __-_ . v..n nn.. ui ~~~ ;,, .~ ri ((f ~,~ d A4.2 o„,A~,oo~ P.F. CHANG'S CHINA BISTRO r`°""N°""' VICTORIA GAR DPNS RnNCHO CUCAMONGA CA ~. ~ .n,. ~~ ,r- ,,, A4.3 • P.F. CHANG'S CHINA BISTRO ____ VICTORIA GARDENS ft ANCHO CUCAMONGA CA A) M1IRY }n01 f ROIFCI u0 Att]• ~~ ~~ ~~ I -1=- ~_ A4.~ 0) MAV ]1101 P.F. CHANG'S CHINA BISTRO _ _ P4O1C~I_°°I~~) VICTORIA GARDENS RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7 10 p m Brent Le Count June 1, 2004 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003-01160 - FANCHER DEVELOPMENT - A request to develop a 6,502 square foot P F Chang's restaurant with two patio areas totaling 1,121 square feet in the Mixed Use District of the Victoria Gardens Regional Center, located on the east side of Day Creek Boulevard, north of Foothill Boulevard - APN 0227-201-35 Design Parameters The bwldmg will be located at the southeast comer of Day Creek Boulevard and South Mainstreet, thereby1 forming part of the entry statement to the South Mainstreet district The South Mainstreet district is intended to be the high fashion, trendy, and very flashy section of the mall and the design of the PF Chang's restaurant, with its bold geometric shapes and colors, fits this theme well The north elevation of the building will have a row of stone covered columns connected by a large wooden member A large, full size statue of a horse is placed at the main entrance to the bwldmg at the southwest comer The service area is neatlytucked away on the east side of the bwldmg well incorporated into the architecture A barrel roof structure is proposed to be covered with composition file Staff Comments The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion Major Issues The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project There are no mator design issues Secondary Issues Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues The only outstanding design issue is the use of composition tale roofing material for the barrel roof The City has along-standing tradition of not using composition file roofing, and while this is a highly artistic use of the material, there ~s the potential for the building to set precedence Staff requests that the Committee discuss the matter and consider alternative materials such as standing seam metal roofing as is suggested in the graphic presentations of the bwldmg Policv Issues The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion Roof top equipment must be fully screened from surrounding areas Restaurants often have great vents/exhaustfans that can stick up above parapets several feet Ensure that parapets are high enough to screen all roof-mounted equipment even from higher elevations north of the site (Day Creek Boulevard slopes up at 3 percent towards the north) Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the protect Design Review Committee Action• Members Present Fong, McPhail, Stewart Staff Planner Brent Le Count EXHIBIT "F" DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2003-01160 - FANCHER DEVELOPMENT June 1, 2004 Page 2 The Committee directed the applicant to work with staff towards finding another roof material besides composite shingle because its use is contrary to design policy, as well as recent requests for commercial applications of the matenal have been turned down Real copper or other metal roofing is acceptable The Committee cautioned the applicant that the landscape architect for the protect must be licensed in California The applicant agreed to all Committee direction The Committee recommends approval of the project to Planning Commission subject to these modifications ~~ • D- `~ RESOLUTION NO 04-84 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO DRC2003-01160, A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A 6,502 SQUARE FOOT P F CHANG'S RESTAURANT WITH TWO PATIO AREAS TOTALING 1,121 SQUARE FEET IN THE MIXED USE DISTRICT OF THE VICTORIA GARDENS REGIONAL CENTER LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD, NORTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF- APN 0227-201-35 A Rectals 1 Faucher Development Services filed an application for the approval of Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-01160, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter m this Resolution, the subtect Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 14th day of July 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and concluded said heanng on that date All legal preregwsites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred . B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby speafically finds that all of the facts set forth m the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public heanng on July 14, 2004, inGudmg written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to property located within the Victoria Gardens Regional Center to be accessed by the internal circulation system of the Center that is connected to Day Creek Boulevard, Church Street, and Victoria Gardens Lane, and is presently under construction, and b The property surrounding the site is under construction with the Victoria Gardens Regional Center, and c The proposed bar, m contunction with a full service restaurant, wdl provide a high quality form of dining that will work synergistically with the Victoria Gardens protect, and d The protect is designed with 360-degree architectural quality consistent with the design obtedrves of the Development Code, and e The protect is part of the master planned Victoria Gardens Regional Center and, thereby, exhibits compatibility with the planned surrounding arculation system and development, and ~I PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-84 DRC2003-01160 - P F CHANG'S July 14, 2004 Page 2 f There is ample parking available in the large parking fields and on-street parking areas associated with the Vidona Gardens protect 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the obtectives of the Development Code, the Victoria Community Plan, the Victoria Gardens Master Plan, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located b The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, v~nll not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially intunous to properties or improvements in the vanity c The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and the Victoria Community Plan 4 The Gty Councl approved the overall Victoria Gardens Regional Center by entering into a Development Agreement and a Development Disposition Agreement with the applicant, and by approving a Tentative Parcel Map and Victoria Community Plan Amendment on February 20, 2002 . The City Council adopted a Protect Environmental Impact Report as environmental clearance for these agreements and entitlements The current Development Review application is consistentHnth the scope of work and type of development analyzed by the Project EIR Furthermore, there have been no changes in the arcumstances surrounding the project nor has new information surfaced to indicate that the project would have substantial environmental impacts beyond those discussed in the EIR Therefore, no subsequent or supplemental EIR is necessary based upon the findings as follows a The protect is within the scope of that evaluated by the Protect Environmental Impact Report for the Victoria Gardens Master Plan, Development Agreement, Tentative Parcel Map, Development Disposition Agreement, and Final Environmental Impact Report as certified bythe City Council on February 20, 2002 (State Clearinghouse No 20010301028), and b There have been no substantial changes made either to the protect or the arcumstances surrounding the protect since the City Council certified the Protect Environmental Impact Report on February 20, 2002, and c No new information of substantial importance has arisen since the Protect EIR was certified to indicate that the protect would have significant effects not discussed in the EIR orthat the mitigation measures imposed are infeasible 5 NotHnthstanding any other provision or condition in this Resolution, nothing herein shall be interpreted as a waiver or modification of the approved Development Agreement and Master Plan for Victoria Gardens, and in the event of any conflict between this Resolution and the Development Agreement or the Master Plan, the Development Agreement or Master Plan shall supersede and be • controlling ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-84 DRC2003-01160 - P F CHANG'S July 14, 2004 Page 3 6 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Engineennq Diwsion 1) All pertinent conditions of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTT15716 and the Victona Gardens Master Plan Development Agreement No 01-02 shall ~ aPPb The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF JULY 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Rich MaGas, Chairman • ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Plamm~g Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Plamm~g Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Plamm~g Commission held on the 14th day of July 2004, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS ~~ • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - DRC2003-01160 SUBJECT: P F CHANG'S APPLICANT: FANCHER DEVELOPMENT LOCATION: VICTORIA GARDENS REGIONAL CENTER ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements 1 The appllcant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, Its agents, officers, or employees, because of the Issuance of such approval, or In the alternative, to relinquish such approval The appllcant shall reimburse the Clty, Its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the Clty, Its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such actlon The Clty may, at Its sole discretion, participate at Its own expense In the defense of any such actlon but such participation shall not relieve appllcant of his obligations under this condition 2 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 04-84, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved In the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect B. Time Limits Conditional Use Permit approval shall expire if building permits are not Issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file In the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and The Vlctona Community Plan SC-1-04 Comole6on Date -/-/- -/-/- / / / / I \plannmg\final\pingcomm\dre2003-01160cond7-14 doc ~ I X Protect No DRC2003-07160 Comolehon Date D 2 Pnor to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions _/_/~ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and _/_/_ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _I_/_ submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bulding permits 5 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/_/_ consistency prior to issuance of any permtts (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, I building, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved 1 use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 ~ Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all _/_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance 7 A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved _/_/_ by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of budding permits Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adtacent properties 8 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be _/_/_ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonrywalls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For single- lt d d ergroun vau s family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in un 9 All budding numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, _/_/_ including proper illumination 10 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property _/_/_ owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of building permtts Shopping Centers 1 ,Graffiti shall be removed wdhm 72 hours -/-/- 2 The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and _/_/_ debris remain for more than 24 hours 3 Signs shall be conveniently posted for "no overnight parking" and for "employee parking only " _//_ 4 All operations and businesses shall be conducted to comply with the following standards which shall be incorporated into the lease agreements for all tenants a Noise Level -All commercial activities shall not create any noise that would exceed an _/_/_ exterior noise level of 60 dB during the hours of 10 p m until 7 a m and 65 dB during the hours of l a m until 10 p m b Loading and Unloading - No person shall cause the loading, unloading, opening, closing, or _/_/_ other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar obtects between the hours of 10 p m and 7 a m unless otherwise specified herein, • in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to a residential area SC-1-04 ~ I I 2 Protect No DRC2003-07160 Comolehon Date 5 The lighting fixture design shall compliment the architectural program It shall include the plaza _/_/_ • area fighting fixtures, budding fighting fixtures (exterior), and parking lot fighting fixtures E. Building Design 1 All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted egwpment andlor _/_/_ protections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from ad/scent properties and streets as regwred by the Planning Division Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the bwiding design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner Details shall be included in building plans 2 For commeraal and industrial pro/ects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main _/_/_ budding colors F. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1 All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long W hen a side of any parking space abuts _/_/_ a bwlding, wall, support column, or other obstructicn, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide 2 All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, _/_/_ and exits shall be striped per Cary standards 3 Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commercial and office faalities with 25 or more _/_/_ parking stalls Designate two percent or one stall, whichever is greater, of the total number of stalls for use by the handicapped G. Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in _/_/_ the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval poor to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 A minimum of 30% of trees planted within commeraal protects, shall be speamen size trees - 24- _/_/_ inch box or larger 3 Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking _/_/_ stalls 4 Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adtacent to and along structures at a rate of one _/_/_ tree per 30 linear feet of building 5 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertia3i height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 _/_/_ slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 8 All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater _/_/_ slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting regwred by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 7 For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for _/_/_ the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas SC-1-04 ~r~ T 3 d(J Project N o DRC2003-01160 Comolehon Date within the public right-of-way All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintajned in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizrng, mowing, and trimming Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage 8 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, the _/_/_ design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division 9 Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for City Planner review and approval _/_/_ prior to issuance of building permits These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree speaes 10 Landscaping and Irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the prinaples of _/_/_ Xeriscape as defined In Chapter 19 16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Muniapal Code H. Signs 1 The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval _/_/_ Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall requve separate application and approval by the Planning Dvision prior to installation of any signs I. Other Agencies 1 The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location _/_/_ of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of budding permits , APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS. NOTE ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) J. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following _/_/_ a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single Ilne diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Division Pro/ect Number (i e , SUBTT #, SUBTPM#, DRC #) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report _/_/_ Architect'slEngineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal 4 SC_,_04 ,Va Project No DRC2003-01160 Comolehon Date 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to _/_/_ the City prior to permit issuance 4 Separate permits are requred for fencing and/or walls _/_/- 5 Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the _/_/_ Building and Safety Division 6 Developers wishing to partiapate in the Community Energy Effiaency Program (CEEP) can _/_/_ contact the Bwlding and Safety Division staff for information and submittal requirements K. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be _I_I_ 1 marked with the pro/ect file number (i e , DRC2003-01160) The applicant shall complywith the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations to ' effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordrnance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to Issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development pro/ect or _I_/_ ma/or addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division prior to permits issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map _!_/_ recordation and pnor to Issuance of bulding permits L. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the California Bulding Code (CBC) for property line clearances _I_I_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions _/_/_ 3 Plans for food preparation areas shall be approved by County of San Bernardino Environmental _/_/_ Health Services prior to Issuance of building permits 4 Provide draft stops In attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC _/_/_ Section 1505 5 Roofing materials shall be Class "A " _/-/- 6 Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC Table 5-A _/_/_ 7 Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC Table 5-A _/_/_ 8 Provide smoke and heat venting in accordance with CBC Section 906 _/_/_ 9 Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional regwrements may be needed _/_/_ M. Grading 1 Grading of the sub/ect property shall be in accordance with Califoma Building Code, City Grading _/_/_ Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be In substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to _/_/_ perform such work SC•1-04 ,rJ•~ 5 LJ Project N o DRC2003-01160 Comotehon Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: N. Security Lighting 1 All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power _/_/_ These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell 2 Ali buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the bwldmgs, with _/_/_ direct lighting to be provided by all entryways Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development O. Security Hardware 1 One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors If windows are within _/_/_ 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used 2 All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices _I_/_ 3 Ail roof openings giving access to the building shall be secured with either iron bars, metal gates, _/_/_ or alarmed P. Windows 1 Security glazing is recommended on storefront windows to resist window smashes and impede _/_/_ entry to burglars 2 Security/burglar bars are not recommended, particularly in residences, due to the delay or _/_! prevention of a speedy evacuation in case of fire Q. Building Numbering 1 Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime _/_/_ wsibdiry APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED S~-, _U4 bob ~J 6 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT STANDARD CONDITIONS May 18, 2004 P F Chang Restaurant Vrctona Gardens Regina Ctr DRC2003-01160 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply Desrgn gurdehnes for Frre Hydrants The following provrdes design gurdehnes for the spacing and location of fire hydrants a The maximum distance between fire hydrants m commercral/rndustnal protects rs 300 feet No portron of the extenor wall shall be located more than 150 feet from an approved fire hydrant For cu]-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 100 feet b Fire hydrants are to be located The preferred locations for fire hydrants are 1 At the entrance(s) to a commercial, mdustnal or residential protect from the public roadways 2 At intersections 3 On the nght srde of the street, whenever practical and possible 4 As requred by the Frre Safety Drvrsron to meet operatronal needs of the Fire Drstnct 5 A minimum of 40 feet from any building f If any portron of a facrlrty or building rs located more than 150 feet from a publrc fire hydrant measured on an approved route azound the extenor of the facrlrty or building, additional pnvate or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the requrred fire flow shall be provrded g Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of requrred fire flow or fractron thereof FSC-2 Fire Flow The requrred mmrmum fire flow for thrs protect, when automatic fire spnnklers are installed rs 1500 gallons per minute at a mrnrmum resrdual pressure of 20 pounds per square rnch Thrs flow reflects a 50 percent reductron for the rnstallatron of an approved automatrc fire spnnkler system rn accordance with NFPA 13 wrth central station monrtonng Thrs requrrement rs made m accordance wrth the Cahforma Frre Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Frre Drstnct Ordinances Publrc fire hydrants located wrthrn a 500-foot radrus of the proposed protect maybe used to provrde the requrred fire flow subject to Frre Drstnct revrew and approval Pnvate fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provrde requrred fire flow Frrewater plans are requrred for all projects that must extend the exrstrng water supply to or onto the srte Building permits will not be issued until firewater plans are approved. On all srte plans to be submrtted for revrew, show all fire hydrants located wrthrn 600 feet of the proposed project srte FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems 1 Pnor to submrttrng plans for an overhead automatrc fire spnnkler system, the app]rcant shall submrt plans, specrficatrons, and calculations for the fire spnnkler system underground supply prpmg Approval of the underground supply prpmg system must be obtained pnor to submrttrng the overhead fire spnnkler system plans va~- FSC-4 Requirement for an Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distnct Ordinance 15, the 2001 Cahfomia Fire Code and/or any other applicable standards regmre an approved automatic fire spnnkler system to be installed m 1 Commercial or mdustna] structures greater than 7,500 square feet 2 In Assembly Occupancies FSC-5 Fire Alarm System 1 Pnor to any installation, modification and/or additions to the building fire alarm system, Fue Construction Services' approval and a building permit must be obtained Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services m accordance with RCFPD Fire Alann Standard # 1~0-6 2 Based on the number of spnnkler heads, the spnnkler system is required to monitored by a listed central station fire alarm system FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire Distnct access roadways include public roads, streets, and highways as well as pnvate roads, streets, dnve aisles, and/or designated fire lanes Please reference the RCFPD Fire Lanes Standazd #9-8 1 Location of Access All portions of the structures 1'i story extenor wall shall be located within 150 feet of Fue Distnct vehicle access, measure on an approved route azound the extenor of the building Landscaped areas, unpaved changes m elevation, gates and fences aze deemed obstructions 2 Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are a The mrmmum unobstructed width is 26 feet b The maximiun inside tum radms shall be 20 feet c The minimum outside turn radius shall be 46 feet d The mrmmum radms for cul-de-sacs is 45 feet e The mrmmum vertical clearance is 14 feet, 6 inches f At any pnvate entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20 feet on each side g The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9 degrees or 20 percent h The maximum grade of the dnving surface shall not exceed 12% i Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GV W) ~ Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept tnmmed to a minimum of 14 feet, 6 inches from the ground up Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fue Department apparatus Access Doorways Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided as follows a In buildings without high-piled storage, access shall be provided m accordance with the 2001 Cahfomia Building Code, Fue and/or any other applicable standazds b In buildings with high-piled storage access doors shall be provided m each 100 lineal feet or major fraction thereof, of the extenor wall that faces the required access roadways When railways are installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fue Distnct access to al] required openings Access Walkways Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all required building extenor openings CommerciaUIndustrial Gates Any gate installed across a Fire Department access road shall be in accordance with Fire Distnct Standard #9-2 The following design regwrements apply a The gate shall be motonzed and slide open honzontally or swing inward b All gates must open at the rate of one second for each 1 foot of required width b~5 c When fully open, the m~mmum width shall be 20 feet • d Gates aze not required to be motonzed 7 Fire Lane Identi5cation Red curbing and/or s~gnage shall identify the fire lanes A stte plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire D~stnct standards shall be included m the azch~tectural plans submitted to B&S for approval 8 Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan A copy of the approved Altemahve Method apphcahon, ~f applicable, must be reproduced on the azclutectura] plans submitted to B&S for plan review FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits Listed aze those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or bu~ldmg construction Plan check submittal is required with the permit apphcahon for approval of the permit, field inspection is regwred pnor to permit issuance General Use Permit shall be required for any actrvrty or operation not specifically descnbed below, which m the ]udgment of the Fire Chief ~s likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property • Candles and open flames m public assemblies Compressed Gases Public Assembly • Tents, Canopies and/or Arr Supported Structures Liquefied Petroleum Gases FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted The request must be submitted on the Fire D~stnct "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee 0 PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1 Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit construction plans, spec~ficat~ons, flow test data and calculations for the pnvate water main system for review and approval by the Fire Distnct Plans and installation shall comply with Fire Drstnct Standards Approval of the on-site (pnvate) fire underground and water plans is required pnor to any building permit issuance for any structure on the site Pnvate on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed m accordance with RCFPD Standazds # 9-4, #10-2 and #10-4 The Building & Safety Drv~s~on and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections All pnvate on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable pnor to delivenng any combustible framing matenals to the site Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber ~s dropped 2 Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new pubbc fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fue D~stnct and CCWD On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard # 9-8 . 3 All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable pnor to delivenng any combustible framing matenals to the site CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the pubbc bay water system by CCWD Fire Construction Servces must grant a clearance before lumber rs dropped . 4 Construction Access The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Frre Lane Standard #9-7 All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road 5 Fire Flow A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed m accordance with Frre Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures" PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: 1 Hydrant Markers All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway m accordance with the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers" On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location 2 Private Fire Hydrants. For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, m the presence of Frre Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for luring the company to perform the test A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Servrces verifying the fire flow available The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow • m accordance with the California Frre Code 3 Fire Sprinkler System Pnor to the issuance of a Certrficate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Frre Construction Servrces 4 Fire Sprinkler Monitoring Pnor to the rssuance of a Certrficate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler monrtonng system must be tested and accepted by Frre Construction Servrces. The fire sprinkler monrtonng system shall be installed, tested and operational rnunediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subject to the release of power) 5 Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Frre Construction Servrces before occupancy rs granted and/or equipment is placed in service The system must be monitored by the buildings fire alarm 6 Fire Alarm System Prior to the issuance of a Certrficate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Frre Construction Servrces 7 Access Control Gates Pnor to the rssuance of a Certrficate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards #9-1 or #9-2 by Frre Construction Servrces 8 Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the rssuance of any Certrficate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed m accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Frre Construction Servrces The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohrbtt parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who rs responsible for the required annual inspections and the • maintenance of all required fire access roadways 9 Address: Pnor to the rssuance of a Certrficate of Occupancy, commercialhndustnal and multr- family buildings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness When the building pa ~- setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street, an additional non-illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance Larger address numbers will be required . on buildings located on wide streets or built with large setbacks m multr-tenant commercial and mdustnal buildings The suite designation numbers and/or letters shall be provided on the front and back of all suites 10 Confidential Business Occupancy Information The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distnct "Confidential Business Occupancy Information' form This form provides contact mfonnation for Fire D~stnct use m the event of an emergency at the subject bmldmg or property This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector 11 Mapping Site Plan Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8 %i' x 11" or 11" x 17" srte plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard #13-1 shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as required m the standard The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector r1 U ~a~ T H E C I T Y O F R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE July 14, 2004 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, Clty Planner BY Nancy Fong, AICP, Senior Planner SUBJECT TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16237 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to subdivide 9 23 net acres of land into 8 parcels for the purpose of developing a shopping center in the Mixed Use Dlstnct of the Victoria Arbors Master Plan, located at the southeast corner of Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard - APN 0227-161-39 Through the preparation of an Initial Study, this action has been determined to be within the scope of the supplement to the Victoria Arbors . Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (State Cleannghouse No 98041137) that was certified by the City Council on July 7, 1999, and no additional environmental notice for the discretionary actions pertaining to the proposed protect is required pursuant to Public Resources Oode Section 21166 Related files Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00504 and Variance DRC2004-00522 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003-00504 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to develop a village commercial center wnsisting of 6 specialty retail and restaurant buildings, 1 bank, and 1 specialty market building totaling 79,661 square feet on approximately 9 23 acres of land within the Mixed Use District of the Victona Arbors Master Plan, located at the southeast comer of Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard -APN 0227-161-39 Through the preparation of an Initial Study, this action has been determined to be within the scope of the supplement to the Victoria Arbors Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (State Cleannghouse No 98041137) that was certified by the City Council on July 7, 1999, and no additional environmental notice for the discretionary actions pertaining to the proposed protect is required pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166 Related files Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16237 and Variance DRC2004-00522 VARIANCE DRC2004-00522 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to reduce the building and landscape setback from the required 45 feet to 20 feet for Buildings A and H along Base Line Road within a proposed village commercial center totaling 79,661 on approximately 9 23 acres of land in the Mixed Use District of the Victoria Arbors Master Plan, located at the southeast corner of Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard -APN 0227-161-39 Through the preparation of an Initial Study, this action has been determined to be within the scope of the supplement to the Victoria Arbors Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (State Clearinghouse No 98041137) that was certified by the City Council on July 7, 1999, ITEMS E, F, G PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM16237, DRC2003-00504, & DRC2004-00522 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES July 14, 2004 Page 2 and no additional environmental notice for the discretionary actions pertaining to the proposed protected is regwred pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166 Related files Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16237 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00504 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Surrounding Land Use and Zoning North - Single-family homes, Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) South - Single-family homes, Mixed Use District (Low-Medium 4-8 dwelling units per acre) East - Vineyard and Joseph Fdippi Winery, Single-family homes under construction, Mixed Use District (Low-Medwm 4-8 dwelling units per acre) West - Vacant, Regional Related Commercial/Office District B General Plan Designations Protect Site - Mixed Use-Village Commercial -Victoria Community Plan North - Low-Medium Residential -Victoria Community Plan South - Mixed Use -Victoria Community Pian East - Mixed Use -Victoria Community Pian West - Regional Related Commercial -Victoria Community Plan C Site Characteristics Immediately east of the site is the Joseph Fdippi Winery, which includes vineyards, manufacturing and bottling of wine, and wine tasting The site is rough graded based on the approval of Victoria Arbors Master Plan There is currently a trailer on site being used as a temporary sales office for DR Horton who stated that they would need the trailer for 2 to 3 months until the sales offices are completed within the model homes At such time, the trader would be removed and the site wdl be restored to its rough graded conddion D Parking Calculations Number of Number of Square Parking Spaces Spaces Tvoe of Use Foota a Ratio Regwred Provided Retail/Restaurant' 48,038 5/1000 Bank 4,293 5/1000 Market 27,330 5/1000 Total 79,661 ' 398 413 * Note Allow up to 15% food uses - 12,100 sq ft \_J • • ~,~Ga PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM16237, DRC2003-00504, & DRC2004-00522 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES . July 14, 2004 Page 3 ANALYSIS A Evolution of the Proposed Project The Setting The protect site is part of the Victoria Arbors Master Plan and is planned for a future village commercial center It is also adtacent to the existing historic Regina/Ellena Winery (now the working Joseph Filippi Winery) The Master Plan contains very speafic Design Guidelines that describe how the two sites are to be integrated in the design so that the two properties would function and visually appear as one The applicant, Marketplace Partners, initially proposed a commercial center that included adrive-thru drug store and a fast food restaurant, a specialty market, and several bwlding pads, which was indicative of a typical neighborhood shopping center 2 The Concerns As a result of a neighborhood meeting on September 23, 2003, - concerns were raised by representatives of the Fdippi Winery, a representative of the Etiwanda Historic Society, and residents within the Etiwanda community Staff also received a-mails (a total of 17) from concerned residents obtecting to a typical neighborhood center with adrive-thru drug store and fast food restaurant In summary, the primary concern was with the design of the center, the drive-thru drug store and restaurant, and the types of uses that will be attracted to the center They believe those uses would not provide compatibility or synergy designed with the historic winery Another concern was that the design of the center "turned its back" to the historic winery and did not provide the integration as described in the Master Plan Their identified concerns led to a workshop on the proposed protect by the Planning Commission and the formation of the Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Task Force Commission Workshop On January 14, 2004, the Planning Commission conducted a workshop to review the meats of the proposed protect The consensus of the Commission was that it could not support the protect design because it did not integrate well with the historic winery and they did not believe that drive-thru uses and typical neighborhood uses would relate and tie m with the historic winery They directed the applicant to modify the design to reflect a true village commercial center with destination types of uses The Commission also mentioned that the City Counal had formed a Task Force to review several in-fill areas along historic Etiwanda Avenue and around the historic sites Attached is the January 14, 2004, Commission workshop minutes (Exhibit "K") 4 Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Task Force Meetings Because of several m-fill development areas within the Etiwanda area that affect historic sites, a Task Force was formed to discuss and review the land uses and design of those identified areas The protect site is identified as one of the rime areas of concern On February 11, 2004, the Task Force (Mayor Pro Tem Williams, Councilmember Howdyshell, Commissioner McPhail and Commissioner Stewart) Beaded to focus on the proposed . protect since it was already in the design review process The concerns expressed by the Task Force could be summarized as follows ~, F, ~ 3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM16237, DRC2003-00504, & DRC2004-00522 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES July 14, 2004 • Page 4 The design of the center attracts the wrong type of uses Dnve-thru uses would attract neighborhood and service types of uses such as video arcades, beauty salons, dry cleaners, etc These uses are not destination types and would not fit in well with the histonc wmery because they would not support and enhance each other b The design of the project "turns its back" to the winery, and therefore, did not relate nor link the two properties so that they are integrated and function as "one protect " The architectural style for the center should complement the winery and should be speaal but not m the same repeated style as in the Terra Vista Town Center Signs must be reflective of the historic nature of a winery village theme and the maintenance of the center must be at a high standard The Task Force felt it should be a destination type speaalty commercial center and believed that Henry's Market is a highly desirable use for the center (In May 2004, staff received 59 letters from residents who are m support of Henry's Market) With encouragement from the Task Force, the applicant and the wmery . representatives began to work together and the protect design began to evolve to address the concerns At the March 24 meeting, the applicant produced a redesigned concept that the Task Force generally favored and it agreed to move the protect back to the Design Review Committee for completion of the design process The Task Force reviewed the redesigned protect again at the May 18 meeting and was m support of it, but directed the applicant to continue to work with staff and the winery representatives to narrow the list of uses allowed for the center Minutes of the February 11, February 17, and Draft Minutes of March 2, March 24, and May 18, 2004 are attached for the Commission's reference (Exhibit "L") 5 Proposed Project The cooperative efforts of the applicant and the winery representatives together with the directions of the Task Force and concerned residents helped shape the design of this protect The essence of the redesigned protect is Removed the drive-thru drug store and dnve-thru restaurant uses However, a drive-thru bank is proposed at the southwest side of the site, which is furthest away from the historic winery Provided an east west orientation for Building B that now relates to the winery, which includes large plaza open spaces that have continuous pedestrian linkage to the winery site The large plaza open spaces are nchly provided with pedestrian amenities that will encourage destination types of uses to be located at this bwlding . ~,~~~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM16237, DRC2003-00504, & DRC2004-00522 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES July 14, 2004 Page 5 c Buildings A and H along Base Line Road have a reduced setback so that they will provide streetscape compatibility to the existing winery bwlding to the east d The view corridor into the protect site from the corner of Day Creek and Base Line Road was opened up to provide a better vista into the center and also provide a large plaza area and pedestrian amenities - e The architectural style for the buildings in the center is a variation of the winery theme, which was taken from the design vocabulary from existing winery buildings f The applicant proposed a list of appropriate uses such as cafes, restaurants, a greeting card store, book store, jewelry store, florist, etc , that would go into Buildings A and B and a list of prohibited uses for the center g Asign-program that has a historic nature in appearance and not the typical illuminated types of signs for the center is proposed h Proposed is a maintenanceloperational program to assure high standards of operation and quality tenants for the center It proposes having property management enforce illegal signs with penalties i The landscape theme incorporates vineyards along Base Line Road and the corner of Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard and along Day Creek Boulevard B Uses Allowed The applicant has been cooperative and willing to make compromises in addressing the concerns with the types of uses that would fit in well and complement the historic winery use He has submitted a list of prohibitive uses such as drive-thru restaurants, drug stores with drive-thrus, convenience markets, video arcades, automotive uses, thrift stores, etc and a list of allowed uses (Exhibit "M") The Task Force and winery representatives reviewed the lists and felt that the lists were heading in the right direction, however, there was still some hesitancy on the appropriateness of several uses that regwred further discussion The applicant stated he is still willing to work out those minor issues The consensus of the Task Force was to amend the Arbors Master Plan so the list of uses would become part of public record for implementation Staff recommended that the uses would be handled as a condition of this Conditional Use Permit and affirmed through a separate amendment to the Master Plan, to be initiated by the City at a later date C Management/Operational Standards To address the concern of the Task Force regarding the maintenance of the center, the applicant submitted proposed methods for achieving high standards of operation and quality tenants This method includes a special sign program that depicts signs of a historic nature rather than typical illuminated signs and a strict enforcement of illegal signs from tenants by the property management The Task Force reviewed the proposed methods and was in support of them Conditions of approval are placed in the attached Resolution to regwre the continued implementation of the high quality operation standards for the life of the protect, and the establishment of a urnque sign program that incorporates a historic flavor in the design ~j ! ~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM16237, DRC2003-00504, & DRC2004-00522 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES July 14, 2004 Page 6 D Design Review Committee On May 4, 2004, the Design Review Committee (Fletcher, Stewart, Fong) reviewed the redesigned protect and recommended approval with the condition that the following issues be properly conditioned with the protect Conditions have been incorporated in the protect or have been placed as conditions of approval (Exhibit „N„) 1 The back side of the towers for Bwldings B and C to have the same level of treatment as the front elevation 2 The detailing and architectural elements are very important in making this a quality protect and must be shown on the plans 3 The sign program needs to be unique and not the typical signs that one might find in a neighborhood center E Variance Request The applicant filed an application requesting a Variance (DRC2003-00522) for reduang the bwlding and landscape setback along Base Line Road from 45 to 20 feet at the closest point for Buildings A and H At the March 2, 2004, Task Force meeting, it was discussed that the buildings along Base Line Road could relate better to the existing historic winery to the east by using similar reduced setbacks The winery bwlding has a minimal setback from the curb The Task Force believed that the site is unique as it abuts a historic winery, unlike other sites in the City The applicant believes it wdl better integrate the two properties visually as "one protect" consistent with the Arbors Master Plan Guidelines The Task Force was in favor of the request Information necessary to support the legal findings is in the attached Resolution and the applicant's tustification letter (Exhibit "O") F Subdivision The proposed protect includes a subdivision of the site into 8 parcels Conditions of approval have been placed to ensure that the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) include requirements for reciprocal access and parking and maintenance of landscaping and common plaza areas G Environmental Assessment On July 7, 1999, the City Councl certified the Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No 98041137) as adequate and complete On December 20, 2000, the City Council adopted Facts and Findings and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for approving the Victoria Arbors Land Use entitlements On March 21, 2001, the City Councl approved an addendum to the EIR (State Clearinghouse No 98041137) for approving the Victoria Arbors Master Plan and the Tentative Parcel Map ' s that created the parcel for the protect site Based on the Initial Study prepared by the City Environmental Consultant, LSA, Associates, Inc , it was determined that the protect described above is within the scope of the certified EIR and addendum Further, it was determined that none of the elements set forth in Public Resources Code Section 21166 or Section 15162 of the California Environmental Quality Act Gwdelines (CEQA) exists, therefore, no subsequent or supplemental Environmental Impact Report or Mitigated Negative Declaration is regwred to be prepared ~~~~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM16237, DRC2003-00504, & DRC2004-00522 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES July 14, 2004 Page 7 CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Vallev Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radws of the protect site RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16237, Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00504, and Variance DRC2004-00522 through the adoption of the attached Resolutions Respectfully submitted, ~'~ -_.. Brad Buller City Planner BB NF/Is Attachments Exhibit "A" Exhibit "B" Exhibit "C" Exhibit "D" Exhibit "E" Exhibit "F" Exhibit "G" - Site Utilization Map - Tentative Parcel Map 16237 - Detailed Site Plan - Conceptual Grading Plan and Cut and Fill Map - Fire Access Plan - Conceptual Landscape Plan - Plazas and Pedestrian amernties Exhibit "H" - Elevations Exhibit "I" - Details Exhibit "J" - Lighting Plan Exhibit "K" - January 14, 2004 Planning Commission Workshop Minutes Exhibit "L" - February 11, February 17, and March 2, 2004, Task Force Minutes and March 24 and May 18, 2004, Draft Task Force Minutes Exhibit "M" - List of Uses and Operation Standards Exhibit "N" - May 4, 2004 Design Review Committee Action Exhibit "O" - Variance Justification Letter Exhibit "P" - Apnl 5, 2004 Letter Regarding Proposed Changes Draft Resolut ion of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16237 Draft Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00504 Draft Resolut ion of Approval for Variance DRC2004-00522 ~// ' ~~ m on o X 3 6 m~ ~/\ t D ~ w N O J ~ rr I I I I ~-1_ I l' I -~ SITE UTILIZATION MAP TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO 16237 IN THE Cltt OF PANCHO CUCAMONGq W[COUNEY Ory BAN BEfiNARDIN09TAlE OF CALIFORNIA o Y`~ pt1F ,NI[ 2W~ lil! ALMS ORO53 ' E PAVCBS P10 ILRC9 HET I \ ~-`~ ' ~ PARCEL ] P N 13611 ________________ ________ \ PMB 19]/93-100 / I i I~ ~ ~~~ ~ I PARCEL ] PM 13611 ~~ \ I P M 8 193/93-100 ~ \~ (VACANL) ~ IIB - ' WINERY ~~~ R 10 I NAP OR 3913/[] ~ ~ 0 EL YET r 1 ` ) ( I WNEYAR09 SELF STORAGE TRACT NO 16313 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT (MEDIUM) l \ ~ I v \ \ li ~ `` _ -- PARCEL I P Y B I/I PARCEL MAP NO I i I (VALANi) I $ / i i ___ // °~° =I.o ¢ ~~~ J\ ~ ~ _- _- ~~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~.;, vlCll 11 iyLy[ 14PF S-1 i „T I _ ,,,.. r/~ ~~ r ~ Na ~ ... OeY Lw[ yuW m L.e~•~ _ ~ ncnp T C ~ I r TENTATIVE PA~ MAP TENTATIVE PARCEL 0 16237 IN THE CITY OF RANCHO GUCMAONGA COIRRY OF 9IN RERNIJVOINO STATE OF CALIFORNiAo~ MR. NMC•]001• fY vn' 1310 /CII[]mOF03]«•• .ewe PMCR9~• ••~•„ e 1o vsRO RR un ~ A iu~ uPpPl(P^ OPIN ~~Fl N ~ 1 I~ 11 ! WII~FNY !/ 1 u ! ' , I i IB%N( - ` _~ - * V O I ~ ell a a / ! `N.IP~FYARDJ I IJ 1 1 1~ TLLL ~ " [ O i BEVELOPNCNT , ' ! - p ~ W ' 111, , i , ,d„ .I ' I l i.. 1 - _ . ~ t _ - W~ b j ~ I -.,, a I 1 e I, 'I O 1~ ~',.,, _ i 1 ~ 1, 11 1 1 "1~1 T I LNroro~u le __ ~ .: ~nl. -~.~r_t S I~ u. t daW/1G ' ie e[C i I" e I s ~_ r vwosra ti~ 11 I i (~ ~I 3 5 ~u T i . ( a I a euu~vc a ~ ~ ' la .~ w TRACT NB ~` l1 a r ~~ i 4vdnsrn 1 lvavosc ! ~~ a 16J 1I~ II ~ ii ` ~ y y, NaMMG 1 em`onc r ! I RESBCM4L I F 0 ~' I' ~', f 3 ; ~ 1 ~. 1 a, `~ » ~ iOEVCLOPNCNT --I~ R K `. II~' ~'1 `i'„++.,.____ -__~~ ` Ln` ~ 1 a .I °nu ~a dw~4 ~1~ ~~ ~~~Ix° ~s i .`s .- a ~ I I .I ~ 1 I I' "~ I II I 'I !' ~ ~ ~ ( I ~~ ,,'~1 Q L. ~ I F I I ' : ,~~,, , , ,..I' --1-. --,-- , ~i I ~I r f '~ ,. ~--,-' -J , I ~ ~~a.,l e= , ~,~ ~.. ~ a aIW 1 i YID . I r- -i-~~:ar ! ~ I I a~e.G I I g a~l~ 1 1 1 I t 1 ~ I~ I r r II ' yl 1 ~ 7 . a. eu I~ !. !. , ~ 1, . i I ae~asm !. I S ..m' I,jIA ,~ 1 c'1 1 ~4 Z, _ - `I 111 ~ T la - _ I ' ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ , ! 1~ c a ~ 1 I I _ y l 1a 1 veonum ~ e I I i ` ~.i "e4 ~\. I e"~e 1 a\ i ii t, '~6 I is na^'^~ I I I j~! q,;v ,k `I ~'11. ( F _ ___-• _:'.~;, A~•(~i-___~ 'M_.v~ _= wlea -I AI I !~ a1;y - FBI-___ _ ~ ~ g k ! - ~ 0./Y CRCtI(_I BSjyttrAR4F 1e i _ _ _ '! _ _L _y_ ~ Ic 1 g f I I • ~t. a I - _ _- __ ___ _ r_ IE - ____- ___ _ _, ___ _ ~ ___. .! ~ PARCR I PY B I/I PARCCL YAP NO I I ' I ~ uuc w rto UeGeGY .-~ m .r.,__ BflOLYeBI~I w u ".. ' . , ~~~~.. Cfl210PIX KK T-1 b 8, y~~¢ F~g! ~Y{{ ~a]W~I 6 y VICIIJ~ii IdAP i ~ro,. , W l/ I I '- un un~~`a~"i .,~ z A p Sel nl N i„_ Y Met~~a4n +.; "S.r, ;"~~x ~ 51~e `mss ,on°o n~w~i,w e^q o sn~ ,~n z~ 9 ° ~ 7° O / BULDING a!_r i_- _ "y~ 1 ~ Nn I t _ ® a~ ~ RETA - i I i-~ ~ I ~ ~° 292 F t 27,330 SF BUILDING ~ I s m o D i `• I ® , i " two sF ' . _~_, _~ I i I ~ ~_o-_x-'~^ ~ m ~®®®m r 111` ~_ (~ ~ e m v I. I ° - ~_ _ a _ -o '- ~ 7d _.~ ~ ~ - - --° - - y H~ ~ o o- ~tM D i :miolsd _- ~} ~!; _ o i_ ~~~ ® ' `~~«' tt I iii ~.! CzSt ~ - _ - -- - - - ~ \ , , , ® it - - ~ _ p- ~ tL~ ® BANK r G _ __ _ f i E I sE +'a' ~ - e Bt1RDING ~ f 4 -••. ~~ r 1 -x~r- i~~ ' • ~ ~~~ ~ ~4 j BUILf.~INGi q~•..Ctg ° ~ i ~~~yyupP!`~" ~ , ~y. Jpy~ I ssn v ~ •~ 'S[° "~C`Ir~e 'RC~~ _ ,- , yw r?.•n~ ! ~ ~ lhiliaAlilq ~ A~~ I ~~~•tx ; ~" } ».M1 ~ !e~_e"...Y~+^="`° -K, pyy+` tf e~+tz~4~'wllti. `'~,y,yst+~ I _ I Jt I I DAY CREEK BOULEVARD I - ' -~ ~ ~- i Ch t I f t A l t I / l • ; • a ~"' - r"` °nm • n; " `pppgp1e° ~°iOiG ~ e en n orma ion ~can n,_ ynna ion PP MARKETPLACE PARTNERS L P Chadcs loscPh AS50palCS / ~ . < x i ++ , . cee.°+~. waw M~+e Mn fine N>rens --- - - a:,mm RA° Aenw m esnum ~ ss~ieNe®w Rpv0p1ki u RTICS ro.s aWYn c o MARKETPLACE PRDP {~i5°~rn"~~~~"'"bz9~fi svirz iao oryervn losel r'°anm onu s.ne lvs , . Winery Estate Marketplace DRC20071g509 -- -_ m+ inx». imra_ _- , >D .ez~,~~.~a ~. 9,,,a ,,,,, „ -ease °,,.„, ~ SUBA7TPM ~z3, ,,,>,d,,,,m, nu, n°-z,n rnx taoclunen veon+ ,N„,ee,lal,,,, Rancho Cucamonga 5]1U SITEPLAN I SA-1 -- ,1 ~~ _ m 1 11 r n ~ I SECi1GNAA x /~ ' T7 C /V ~ I , I ~ ~ , W ' 1 p u I (~ (n 9unnlNa 11 ~ A ~o sF I I' w fi ~ tl _ _ ~ , e ® P F • ~6n e_ ~~ I I 1 1 l ] 9 A - _E- ~ - t 0Y19F ~ ~ ^ CONCEPTUAL GF~ING PLAN TENTATIVE PARCEL O 16237 IN THE CItt OF MNCHO NGA, COUNTY OF SPN BERNANOINO STA nv um. n . on~.. TE OF CALIFORNIA ui ...r n ,nn.. , F[ rnr ,uµ! ,n1 ~ to a a6 nOn, r , O L I f, i~~{ ' ~o> ~~ ~~ a r ~ ~ .v ----~ ' /G c 1 t o ~"s~~i~? ,. r TTxwsF o ~ 'I I ~ 11 III '~II"~' -q ~ ~~~`v-~,~ ~I!'~~ rr 11 I I~' ~ _ i`11 I I -~ -1111 II y 1 ~ ,~ - -_ -' ~- I_k` I II~ eunplN4 - - _~ = i , I it I N _ ` j`rR~ I sl l '~ r „ ` L~r I I 1(' ~ ~r ~~ ~ I(,I III ~r~t "~ L~ ~ ~ ~ I~ ` BGSDINI3 ~~~ r ' I I 1 11, JXC 1 I ~ `I t _'`-~~ I =~_ __--__ T --- - I rf s~-•-T ~,,,~- `T- S I I _ _______ _______~r__ _ _,I-_' v I I ` ~ti _-_ - -_ _ -- S-- I~ r B/HN 1, `E M]9F ' (J ~~~,><~,.n , . , ~ ..~ ,~` !`-"i • _ 'k _ 5 ~ rq~ ~U C ~ ~~ ~ _~- t NOINNY qAP ~r,r,.,, .., r,,,,, •.~ n /~'~ M9EIINF RMIJ ---..._ t MMR.YNL MNVE n WYfR[IN -_- 7rcuevrnnn .,, a„ T-~ AI- _~ p _~ .___.. ~I .„ I ~~ _sccrax~~ _____II-- -1,~__ ~1 1 ~ ~~~I ~ ~_~:91~CG ,~ ~ 1 sECravee SECTION D-0 SEC/IONEE J r_~~ ,_ SECTIONFF ++ ~1... i rmr ,.. 'I ~,._~ SECTXMrGG SECIIONI I N m5E ~xr n / un on' ,., , -~II 1 SECrIONllll ~7'~ ru u n rxrm I gb v] 4 S 6L~ [k I ^~( Sg3jg3J- ~6. mGi ~~ w mcnt~ ~~~ W ~ -D O ~ ~ O V O O N O (l.~ ~1 O .P If I ~ I 1 I, I 1 I' FX f/I I I I I I I I I M•+ II I ' I }S II 1 4 I II II 1 II I I I\ ~1 I' ~ I •I I~ ~X FII ;~ I I J I I~ I I~ &} ~ ~ '~ 1'I I I .. I I I I .. I , 1~ I, I I I RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT ACCESS PLAN TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO 16237 IN iNE Cltt OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN SERNAROINO STATE OF CAI IFORNIA .....•.~ .....W„ ~.,,•.......,.,,•,,,,...,,• ~,.,,.•.... wic auK :ooi rule .~cna cnox n FMCFlS oio iclrts xEr -----__- __ ~~~_-_~x~,--- __---- I - ___ ____________cx-n/____6~~iSF[Et ~~.'!ILEVf~E~[_______ _____ .-_ _ __ ___ __ ______.~i-rl ___ __ _ __ - __ __ --- ______ --EX-fH- ~___ _ _ _ ^~u~u wrin 9~ - _, _ i 7 .I V =, _ ~, I •~r DDD nu I r ~~ f ---, ~._.._,u... fN i~..Mi.....~ !X RI •^• • F-1 l ~~: ~A~ ~~ '~l i ~~ d" L; s X C ' ~ S ~ ~ I ~ ~ NI ~' ~ Q BUILDING T ~ O A Y6 000 S F I ~ 1 ~ I I O ~l.) ~ I ti -® ^^ ~I-+ I .~ .,..1 ° 1 ~~ ( !~ _ i __ ~ l ~ i= - ~ i II 8~ ~ `_~ ' - s __ ...~ ~ ETAIL - ]~ ~-nl1l~, ,r L ~ ~,~ 1 292 5 F ® ,mom ~ ~, ~. , +~ y, - 2] 330 S F BUILDING ,gam ~q ~ - '~- ~ ~~ 1~' 1 tt D, 7,150 B F I%I 8 O n..., ,.., ..,. ,... ~ . 1 0 ° , . I ' w., . ,w, ,. --~ ll ~' ~ 1 a~, . 6040SF ~ :rte ~ I ~ ~ ~v ~_ ~I O ...`.... ~..r. .., ~ V -~ '~ ~ BANK I O \ '°, + ~ ¢ ` 1 ~:.cC 4 293 S F i , I ~_,. _, ....... .. ~' G I V BUILDING ' ~ " 0039SF may` 10,° .t`r~Tr-~.~ 5 517 S F i ( ~ _ ~TI I ~ i, °°~~°° - ~ _ ~~Y ° _ _ L~ ~n~~ ~~~ ~ ~ a Client In(ormaton A l t I f ti • sY '®° ° °~'°" ~° u MARKETPLACE PARTNERS, L P pp lr~an n orma on Chaslcs lough Assaclalcs , , , „, , , , , , oiv Nr,bna - - ~ yy xwsausmm 'x0'+p° ~ p ® c/o MARKETPLACE Po OPERTIES {j r ~f `' }as "`2& x~ (eas lLquq c lorel r annl ol a s las C scxar.w°wuror mw DFC21p3 U05M -- a ic mm "~' ~° l v s x x n 8898 PI ly m° „ , ~,rc R,rcMCmmm CA 911Jx Winery Estate Marketplace - -- „ „y~yye„ i n X31- Ipv= 111 19-]53s nr P IN~1191 IBR PMv ,WA, 9911RIin Rancho Cucamonga SUBMiPM 16237 ~tlr n nw r a ° n °ohu m nrn rt `¢rt fglA] Sx r.m CUNCCPiIIAI I /1N17$CAI•I I. 1 X C ~l N ~: -i ~ "p o ~ ~ O I I I ~ O b , N O~ _a -- ~ ~ ~ ~ &~ ~~~ ::.~ ~ ,;, _ Rag ~~ \ iv ..tiaouum caxaa: raunwi amnauarro roam ~, IX RrE xb=N~ ff1110..LRIIa ~ arrt ma rR'mrl, HiEiNlE 4AR0 1!';5!Il~' i'R.T~~"F d/ caxnE,F Pnw6 l~ r ~~ ~g ~ ~ , , o~Q ='.~ ~~ .o^ awanrom ~ vas: ixu auixc ,~ ° arh ile _iwumravors i' CORNER PLAZA BASEIJNE d DAY CREEK r ~~ ~~_ try ; r ~: `=i<d,~~ ~~~µ TRELI IS WALK e FROM DAY CRCEK /-ww,e~r rnsms Y dM IffE ~ rax nresn rnax r,nnr .4 rtnnm F~~ ' ~~ s ~r Y~ 'I_ aten rnart noErrEbar ~ vwc CORNER PLAZA MADRIGAL d DAY CREEK -- Client Information gypl~(orma0on :.. ,, ~'. ..'. ~ ca St N-MS ~f°"--- - °` e ..tea. ~~ ~ : w ~°°Y°'P MARKETPLACE PARTNERS L P K E Chadn loscph ASrOLlal6 sc.aw aewa o . a. . ---- - -- wa µ m~ . w a mu,a a wam w.aas c/o MAR ETPLACE PROP RTIES 9~~ sup^c ~"o { '}{{ 's@n "b cbxt Bqm cv nm imrirmmn ai.n swz sas . . . . ORC2003 fA5M -_ .un nx mrnzm "" _ _ __ ~~^~ aau h x z nr m-eeae rxa+• y a.nroc~a, cn umo Winefr/ Estate Market lace 1 P suI,MTPM,8291 --- s* = w rDNOEP,u"I m it h.,i „x-,,=z r,. - , ,a ~u=o~ NZ ' ~'AZ" _,,,,,,~, I I lawl,n iea n, Rancho Cucamonga t2 • ~~A~ ~'„_ ~ ~,. .~ ~ ~,. ~ - \ TRASH RECEMACLE$ -- (ONNTAIN wITN SPIT Lwnv TOIOWER •~v` CFNTRAL PL/SA RAISED PLANTERS J ._ro~..,., ~ ~ ~~- RETAIL C Mnnuini rwisiJ suu Dui, = i _ , IAn(^ a ~i ' - I..,..nnl nii 1 __ -Xy FNa 1.,.4i. _ RI w11al~.q~xunlR A,~,1 '- ,+~Ihlryu0~h I ~ _ a~,e.e Tew+. w.. ~P:I~hf.i,h~ ~yA.~ertIRY~•nRiJrNI ~ MARKETPLACE PAFTNERS, L P Ch+d•_J^.ryh 4r/, ~ar•: .iaoe.mum@ ep Bei°'u eJJe MA oInETFLACC PROPERTIES !mhelrfii E zon I 4 ' E W :.<.~;.~., nu,ar. xm,.enn ur m,.., case moron: DRC20030050A ~"_°'____- - -- -_ Eyc.w ~p pmY+ll ern ..n ,. ~~ dz94E 3dix s RViam a, ns~elawa 4d PsMnOrwlux i 9/ ;~„~ Wlnery Estate Marketplace SuR~,~M Ifi2„ -- -- * rln „,,,,,, „_aaaa r„~„~ E ~iL,~ Tao-asrz~ ro ncl rare E I F ~ M~pw+ I p ,o ,vm~al ael FR Rancho Cucamonga 9~ID 1S - A -~ Axonometric ti ~~~~,;, , +. 5, ~~ e- .'h n ,~ -- ~ --~:' ,~* ., , _~ ~ i ~---- - -~ --- CI~EIELniametlon Ay~llcglrt Inknnetlon .... ~ ..... tees xlydae , ~1ie nwmne meow new TPLACE PARTNERS L P. LLmla Amocie4a • , -- ~ ~~P.~um WWa c p MARI(ETPLACE P~gP~ATIES (md& e&aew.xrwenro+es.a __ enmP®., 3f3n';/"y1AA°RE:9Y6 P"''`'6 anc+m. lmel POOmmmeasannn oRCwro-0oso4 ,,,,~,,,,~, `~" l~=11 ]30-3535FN[~ ~tl11~G91m Winery Estate Marketplace sueN,PN,6:3, --- (fN,tl11RIPC Rancho Cucamonga Mn n cini i iNi°,i i ..r~ a nni i I;- - I~, w ~ -- ~ ~, - - - ,. , - - ----. ,_, ~,~. ,. ~~--,.aw-~. ~.-' I° - ~~~a _ o-s rona oMm rtw rop.eM xr wmro mnzn nnrtxmi - __- --- Llrvatinns A~2~ i i i -• RErAILB RETAILC RETAILD Fast Elevation ~~ 1~ ~M~ "' ~ MnTfRIAI I INI'~II',l Hl OUI I I I E~~. nmXr~.-., _ - wAF___ --_--_ '. I ~ ~ww..im n u_ ~ i mortxrcmle ~ L. - ~ o~. i.i~X i VI~fEX IIXtI ~' Irv _ ~, ~ ~ _ I 'XI ~~~L~riiX'In ~m~upae I u ![ N.nr i i'p^fa ~ati~l l~ fir iia i _ - el e. elx, X~~n~ ~. , Cibnt IriMmietlon MD~~9n1 I<~tlon .. c x ~ .. c .. cam wmxe >~ ""mx"a ~s°O" ~ ~wpuom ~°i°'u TPLACE PARTNERS L. P. p LACE PROPERTIES A R [~T P c M Cbule l"wghAm"mao ddeq.a ~"ew.xmaurax.ox.l ~R(,2~~~ - k0® Ryniml>< ,m."®e xe u Sg ~ ~ Ep p AV B BiIP. CA "E116U BOITd ]00 (ylGltr 1"6IIP.o~&xl, ~beJ9J 1J0 Winery Estate Marketplace S~aNtPF„6:3, ~ , , , , , exo~a ~a_i t 61 1 ~.d.~G9i ,~,,,~„m, , s ~ e,~ x cwt t~~ ncho Cucamon a R om~mJ-tmt~ g a • _ u.IIM na ~ ~xmM KY - mpm mmn a r + w __ _ IMll.m 19mLp11 A-3 L g J l L I G V O l I V 11 RETAIL D _, moo. ~ +- - memmal"rc v"arexnwuf RETAIL D & C ~~ _.~ \, RETAIL B a RETAIL B Mnrnaini ~ Iwsl i s~ urnm r - - - -; Ita.. : ~.~~. u ~. ~~::"" ~,WT ''' - ,... mmm~mn oxrom. tYN We.ma ~eN~Rr91~191I9n NARAETPLACE PARTNERS L P APP-ca[~, Infpllretbn Cbvln laeeg6 AsvocWa '~..cxii.. r. acmv.w. v.eeeo.ormre ~G..NVte. _ mma__- - -_- mp`..m rtuw' a.mvn xr M++w, mmxv u. ,~.o ~~®ms~um ~~ $~ MARAETPLACR PREP RTIES J1~ svi}6 10 ~P~s~ }~ ddM m/Cads 10911e®OPoA BdmJ95 URC20a,i~504 v'~^' ~~"^~ _ ___ ~e ~u 5 p 1 . r G 91)f0 d a Wlne Estate Market lace ry P SUBMIPM,6237 - "" F I a t o n s ~,,,~® 13=11 ,30=353 ~° ~ @ pl I o J R h C c r v i o~rJU„a,~ anc o u amonga q,a South Elevation z ,~ „ 1 1 _ t~ ~~i X11 "bJ~ RETAIL C North Elevation North Elevation \~ ~~ Q~ W O Bulldmg E ..o>eaa y,.,xxa CIIeM Uttamlatlan (~yplk®M loknnatlon "..~.~ .e,. a - MARRETPLACE PARTNERS L.P CLvle Jmryh Amo~iaa x rW laadbv ~+ _ -- ~ ~~s~am ~Bi°'a C~e~pp MARKETPLACE PRBP~RTIES ~lm~ atisa+.w+.+ovo+mu,.a --- m®me fd3f4p",'~P~°Adx9~6 amn to OryCm IoarwoemBhd,9obem DFC26IX1-00604 „~,,,,,~, ~"aG hill t30 3535 ~°~ ~~,G ~~~ Winery Estate Marketplace SUBMIPM 16237 --- - (9xDINIImIPn Rancho Cucamonga MAII ItIN IINISII II III 171111 Ifr* .~ I,h - -i, „~'^ ~... ,o.W.., . ~< I ~r lnAara~+~u ~1-N"r~r. m w n . . I is ~~~i ~.e I ia::Rw. viu I r^~>> M~...'r. aw wra _ e.x uaa o.. n, rt w a~f<h x Y max. mine natim naraFn~ - - ~~~ E~PVdilOnS eirlg F q., Source Image Cardinale Wrnriy Napa Wlley Ca6lomn East Elevation 8ullding E South Elevation 8ullding E Wesl Elevation \~ ~~ Source Image floben MOndm Vinyards Napa Valley Ca Perspective Bwlding F South Elevatlon Source Image we:u~dnevni,n~ v,ie~,~, n III3{ M~ f rRlfll I (NISII SI I I I I illl I Is~ a ,.,,. _;.,, I - - i]I-.....a.w..4... I I ~ ~.w=,~,,,,, v,,,~ - i, MMmp~Axn~4r~i w.n4 ..u ~0.~l iim in inYPl~i~a I, - I " ° °tr ~Dmrt..inrvmtatlon &plicent Infamatlon ~ • . , r " ~ r ~ .. s Gw Nrtbae ~ =- - °" ~ ~ ~ ~ ° ~ °°""" m a am TPLACE PARTNERS L.P MARKETPLACE PR Pt:ATIES (beM]acphAmfl@e mbp" ~aur.m~a.aorowm".a -- ____ o at i ~v __ ~e ~'~° 3~i";'"EC°"b:9Y9 801TB10 a,o~ MMrem¢mMb,aea~n 0 G91)10 Winery Estate Marketplace onczoa3meoa SUBMIPM16237 -- -- _ - - ~.~ ~~ Idlfl 33~=3598 F:~ ~ ~tl11 ow~tlllNln. Rancho Cucamonga --- ~ - - ~'~ I I I I mr ron minx vii - ""' 1=1ev.lllon~ Bldg f q.6 Wesl Elevatlon North Elevatlon Perspecllve 8ullding G ~~ Source Image Mwrertas Well Winery Sama Clara Coumy Ca South Elevatlon "O~e" °jsdpei ~ ~ei uemi ~~Q ee "'": ra ~,,, m rS~11S_IRr41ID_RgQR MI~RttETPLACE PARTNERS L. P. }pd/ MARKETPLACE PRgP~RTIES 3~3d"P.&°"3:9~E :~'" I;t1i 3~a_ss';3 e~^° LPR~Rl lflromletldl CLuloloeW6 AYOCWG ~eyr a,cm IoNr~mameene.~ae3m ~~«~I~ ,~,el.l~l~ •' • :.c,. aef X1 ~xaw.we+mrx+m`+a Winery Estate Marketplace Rancho Cucamonga "~ cam Nndea oncsooamsos SUBMIPM,8297 --- R%i_+_-- - - --- - MAI I IlIAI I INISII tf III 1411 t `;~r"' ~- ,~ti-_- u I ~ ..,.v,+.. " ...~.: „~,M:__, ~ M iy~Akiu ri nt~vi i~ ^~ nniM+'n l.r+n.. C I.X ~~~~ 9n i 1~~n.~ , ^.l. ix~i nib i `° - ,rc e r.. e»M xMM AU -- o~mM xx _ Ix IMn ISUIY_r%1 - __ vra {=~PV8lI0n5 ~ ~~'~`I ° ~ • 7 • i i North Elevatlon ~4N~ j :4 umlTr~eaevr `___ '-=-=~nortrtn..u ^T" e - S'I REET EDGES & PROJECC ENTR w ~., °~ ,m>~p' a~ w Qi M.[[TO"~f~x I I~ ("=A ., y ~. .~a.uM J t.® I J~ I ~~ -- _ -== k _ -- _ - -- - I =- '---- ---~ ~ --- - - ' PIII n~ ~~ 1 ' ~ a ~- I. ~ D H-iu~ I~~~ i I P11191A I~ 1 - lh~NALT--N91F~' E1A'Jlm.' il4t ~~ F l d I r-I ID I - .,: I; 1 b'III D ~~ '- y ~- ~ i ~i .. ~ -- 1 I I I ~ '__ - ~ ~ I I-^-I ~ I ~ I-. ' I 1- - 1 ~~ ~.-. u _ --- _ ~'~ I 1 ' ' 1-'I ~--~-'--I i I -_ _=_ ~. --=- ~ ' _- ~~I,..III.I.~~. M~"wo~. - ARCHITECPUItAL DETAILS & MATERIALS a F bI , u i M,. ~I„ I,. r~ ,~•- . J -•i ~' ~` ~ -T.• al _ y ~,~ apt i.`°- .r. W «-Fn- s•- r~- ~~I~i ~ - , ~.n"Ma„ PEDESTRIANAMENIIIES II,~,~Llu~~~.~ WINERY ESTATE DESIGN AND MATERTAL CUiDE1.TNrS JOSLPH PILIPPI WINI RY ANU UAV CRI I RMARKI'11'IACL ~nl lr4,unA4n AnMR:iri lM.nl.~tkn ...,~.~... ' czu mro„e "~"" __ m dn+ •NOmi"" 1h ~ °p'p1j I°'BSO'u MARKETPLACE PARTNERS L P KET ~ CTmblrcxB Ay,asla sc.l:« wr nlb ur e..w -- - Inn NM ~. -- I..-I e au"-s ippp mwmb. Ibw"mm< ° c o MAR PLACE PROP RTI ES I~~1 NE1~~OP~'j~~ SViTC 100 „• . . ~ o.3wrpa ~. am. Io91FmkTfM ^m~ : „ „~ -, ,,,,, Wlnery Estate Marketplace ORC2g13-00509 -- mra. _ ___ ___ Ib lnn Iryl1-.ta - ""~ ® ~W ,,, „_,o", „„„„e Itt.l lJ0-JS]S FA% ~ „„, (9p7fuIl~Flss o R h C SHBMiPM ~~, A'9 o anc ucam nga ~,i:Ilnlw DRC2003-00504 - -- ----" -- STPM16237 " " • E it I his ;., 1~~~,, I '~ ~t Ew `4 t, ~ ?, `j~ . ~itl == art ~~` '~ U~ 1 1 .4 ~h~u,~ ~k ~t`r'~+ .i jai < ~~'~ ~ - ' "~fTJ - wmnAru~enmwm."u rn..s Aoos ~~-~ y~~~ca., _ v ,. F b yEavsac evY -~ --~~~I 'F^Ca'y',` j~ E\ [ - -- -_~ f,~ , , ~,_, _~ 4vt ~, }{{ A II .1_~ a .•rtr 1 ., i,` I d ~ e. ~~~ ~ ~ ,t -._„_ M1-~ ~- SECTION A' ~-----~~ mf'----'' ELEVATION'C ~-' SCCTION f e+ ELEVATION'B SECTION B' ----- EXPOSED WOOD CANOPY W/ PLASTER FASCIA _ TYP EXPOSED WOOD CANOPY - 1 TOWER SECTION _ __ _ n ~ SCALE 1/4'=1-0' BLDG 'B' SIMILAR @BLDG 'D' ( ~ 1 SCALE 114'=1-0' BLDG 'B' SIMILAR @BLDG 'C 8 D' I ~ SCAI E vn•=t -0• m nc •R• i `,_„ ...~ i ,' Oo I Y_I9f AI_I ORI I RON F ni I IUI ~ ~ ,r~11, .II ECl10N O' ELEVATION E SCSC=TION C fl I p . ELEVATION O S_ - '_ = I ENTRY FEATURE & TRELLIS I E PROJECTING CANOPY SECTION I ~ SCALE i/4'=1 0" BI DG "B SIMILAR @BLDG 0 SCAI E 1IA =1-0 BLDG C REAR R SIDE, SIMILAR @ FlI ^G R _ _ _ I 1 [FASCIA ROOF DETAIL ( rl ~ E RR TQAIL OCTAIL ( ~J ~~RPFTER~A~V,E NNE ¢~~I ,L•[p~~Eli~ ~ 5 ICE mE aTe loGDec eGSluawoolm art 6 I~~EE R~TAI FOCI All / _ RAFTER AI EAVES LE 1?•1 f pLCG S $IMAp QpLW 96G G GGAI eIOG S J ~ Y 1111 w' t IIIIX Cllent Informallon A loo Iwnl lnformatgn , . c x , . 1 c l 1 ' [au wmne ~~ uP"0"' tMRKETPLACE PARTNERS, L P Charles Joseph A550[IaIGi ---~ ~ wo um 1g0ia'u c~o MARKCTPI.ACE PROPERTIES ~ CeW B.ge1 ~a~^^"^+^+Lac-^`~e^" DRC21p1 WSM +p..lo... .awd u ?•rx", c"~`"EzAxf1 sulrz loo } LvACmlx Iwel FOmin nl.a s.lx le. Winery Estate Marketplace 9M7PA11627] -- ~ pj IXIE l l I l P>ab LtrawP.CA 911W SU ~~ -^ ]n-7535 l , '~°""""°'°` ch Cuc mon R (MpI IAI IB31 faa ga an o a x Ym SfLTI0hI5/f)ETAII i xi I A-10 CIEVgT10N'B' SECTION R' I A SECTION @ BARN DOORS t B CANOPY SECTION SCALE 1b'=7-0' RLDG 'G' SCALE 1l4'=1'-0' BLDG 'C' l' 6 4~~ 1 V' ~' , ~ I WOOD ARCHED DOORS W/STONE SURROUND °LOG ,f ~_ ~ . -~ ,t c I I v, WOOD ARCHED DOORS WIPylASTER TRIM am ..role ,,...v mnn. un oac°c c ry-u_ _ _( ~e., ,~, ~cTr ., ~. .-l ,4 a 1 ~ ~ ~~ ' 4° ~' 1n~ ,. c ~ ~.-, r.. - -_ /, I~ , , ELEVATION'D' ELEVATION'C SECTION C (~ , ENTRY FEATURE SCALE 1/A =1 -0' BLDG 'F' c~~w ..R l T ,• J~J_~ _ Y`: ~ i n.~+...- _ _ ( ~ IFASU~%WOOOPWINDO~ONTAIL I A I R~GSES~EO~OUV~ftsOEFAII ( 5 iscu O.~aWatw ro~sHlEUn4aLOC eam I D , CANOPY SECTION _ _ scnLE vl=]-n RI nG r t F CANOPY SECTION __ _ SCALE 1/4'=1 A' OLDG 'H' Clienl Informallon Ay~wnt Infonnahon ~ S , c . ~~.. c'. , erse wroas '~"' -- ^ '~ °+ ~i1q° MARKETPLACE PARTNERS, L P Charles losePh Aes°claln --- ~ ~ x.Fam,usclm ~BOgU LACE PROPERTIES C/0 MARK ET P Od aupn ~•~"°'~'°a F^°H"°' oRC~o7ooson -- ~~., °°°.°° u m T y [ +a~{{. ~~°p93~6V a".,F,°° CbCmly 10691FwilNlal.as~m]°' Winer Estate Market lace Y p TPM 16 77 = - wF,l e, wb°'W pan m-a°ee u,an: v..aoo~.q,.GVm° SUBM 2 ...neyem Ill,l l]°-]a)v FAx ,9A1,BI II33 Arr' Wa ,911131 Fm Rancho Cucamonga ( f _r,~l I I~ 'II II ~.M ~ICtInN~,mrinllsl . ~ 4 ' m ' 4 ^n mN, _ - __A11~ $CCTION'N ELEVATION'F 9FC110N I i ~ • mvao x C ;~ ~m ~-IN _0 0 L ~~ ~ k O W CJi ~I O .A W D m r z m ~o ~~ D \' u BUILDING ~ '• ' I A I ~ +° -d e RETAI ,rr. „ _ , r. ,. , ~ ,. „ p 1, ,. ..I . u~ ,n. J ;k~ ~ p ,A+ 4 , +6 q ~ ~~ 9 ,. b ~ ~ ~~ „ , ~, . ,. ,. ~ . , ; v;a a•I~ r ~,,,, ~- ~, , ~ - 6UILDING , D ~ ~' ~~ ' ;~ ~ - - - - ~ _ -_ ~ , - , , 5. ,. , BLDG Y. ~- ,T - - - _ - ~ , , ,_ ,. ,. ~ _ ~ BANK ,t. ~ „ ~ i e ~. i. , .. - ~ ,. ,. E I I ~ 1 , , ' 5Za - f*~~-~\~ ~ /~1~ OO, ~ ~ ~ ' , i ,. Y. ~~A. ~ \\ \ \~, , , . ~ ,. ~ I \~\\1111/ ' '• BUILDING G ' " ~ '~ `\• ~ + BUILDING '• ~ '~ +' Client Information Aoolicanl Information "' ' ": ; ~'„-: ; 7, ~ ,mu"rm °id ,~'~ eC MARKETPLACE PARTNERS, L P Charles Joseph ASSOma~es .~e.qu am c/55ZOZ MARI<CT PLACC PROPERTIES snuck augur xcem.m. mdwen c,.awe L]iAW h. 'b°~~6 a~5T1Hk1E~Gea'~3aVE Sl11TF 100 GIy C•min IOfiAl Fwln~ DIVA $u~¢]9, , au ,,,._1ooa, fifo10 e aa„,~,~„~„ U 9,,,e Wrnery Estate Marketplace ,..v~,~.+,m. liiil iso-ssas rn:~ (9¢9)aal ieii em~~. Iswleci isa cs, Rancho Cucamonga ill -. I~ i I'L,z, lI kin r~.i i,nm mM im~,~s ^mA.. ~ ~~ ~ 1% ~ ~. I - ~ rrien~n I.ya D r 1nn51M+x1. 9lYllnll rmrl ~` - ' ( I ~ ~`` wa~,~l Fwu cxr~ ny________ ___ ____ Ili-Y _ i-u i ~J i - "-_~~~n ~ ~ i~ 11M'!ms __ _ On Arf ~ ; I, _nl CeSa IMlbis I,.nF M 1 n nIPV YY I^ n I + - oymm mre n DRC2W3 WSDd - - -- suDMrrM Is2a~ °" ' " ' PHOT(1MCTPoC i SA 2 DAY CREEK BOULEVARD CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Ad~oumed Meeting January 14, 2004 Chairman Macas called the Ad~oumed Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission to order at 9 30 p m The meeting was held at Cucamonga County Water Distnct, 10440 Ashford Street, Rancho Cucamonga, California ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS PRESENT Rich Macias, Lany McNiel, Pam Stewart, Richard Fletcher, Cnstine McPhail ABSENT None STAFF PRESENT Brad Buller, City Planner, Nancy Fong, Senior Planner, Alan Warren, Assistant Planner, Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer, Kevin Ennis, Assistant City Attorney .,... NEW BUSINESS A DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00504 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to develop a 90,000 square foot retail center including a 14,480 square foot drug store, 27,000 square foot market, 2 restaurants, and 4 restauranUretad pad sites ranging in size from 7,000 square feet to 14,000 square feet on 9 acres Hnthin the Mixed Use Distnct of the Victona Arbors Master Plan, located at the southeast comer of Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard - APN 0227-161-39 Brad Buller, City Planner, explained the reasons for the workshop He stated that at two previous Design Review Committee meetings, two Commissioners expressed concerns that a drug store would be mappropnate for the site while another two Commissioners believed a drug store could be considered d there were no dnve-thru He further stated that the consensus was that the Commissioners felt uncomfortable vnth the project because the sde design did not fit m with the adtacent winery Mike Rue, representing MartketPlace, descnbed how the protect came about He stated he followed the Victona Arbors Master Plan for designing a neighborhood center with a winery theme for architecture He showed a site plan consisting of a drug store month dnve-thru and future pedestnan connections to the winery and a second site plan with a retail bwlding without the drug store He stated there was interest from a bank to locate at the site He believed he has done everything he could to make a viable shopping center Mr Buller stated that the public was inwted to comment on the protect He indicated the City received a letter from the Etiwanda Histonc Society asking the Commissioners to postpone the consideration of the project until the Task Force formed by the City Council has the opportunity to analyze the land use issues of the area Pete Pitassi, architect representing Fdippi Winery, stated they were not here to debate the ments of the project, however, he urged the Commission to follow the dvection of City Council to have a Task Force to study the master plan area DRC 2003-00504 SUBTPM16237 q Exhlblt "K" ~~ ~ ~ o~p • Gino Fdippi stated that he did not favor a view of the backside of the shopping center from the vantage point of the winery P oIB~IIeHedclanfied that the development ol9atshoppngocenter requaes aiCondiUonal Use Permit even rf the uses within the center are permitted He also noted the review of the design is discretionary and the Commission has the authonty to review the uses to make them fit with the surrounding uses Commissioner Stewart believed a drug store could work here but it cannot be a typical footpnnt stressed that the commerlciahcenterimu trtiefm moth he add cent w nery useo and and ed that certain types of uses such as a dove-thrv may not be appropnate make up of the blus nesses must tee tohthe histonc winerye He stated he could not support dnvthe- thru uses Commissioner McPhail agreed with the other Commissioners and stated that this commercial could not support dove-thru els aShe felt a Henry'srmarket would be atoceptable She said she Commissioner McNiel believed that this area presents an opportunity to create a pedestnan main street within a village commercial center He stated that the sde plan as proposed does not integrate well Huth the histonc winery He reiterated the concerns of Commissioners that the design should be a true village theme moth superb architecture Chairman Macias thanked the applicants for working with staff He stated he agreed vnth all the comments made by the other Commissioners He believed this site must be designed to have a strong relation to the winery He commented that there are strong community feelings about the histonc winery and they should not be discounted protectldesign and that would be the challenge foe theiapphcant s that they could not support the ,.... PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no additional public comments ..,.. The Planning Commission adtoumed at 10 35 p m Res ully submitted, g uller Secretary n January 14, 2004 PC Adfoumed Minutes ~' ~ -~ a 7 February 11, 2004 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ETIWANDA/BASE LINE HISTORIC STUDY TASK FORCE MINUTES Special Meeting A CALL TO ORDER A special meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga Etiwanda Base Line Histonc Study Task Force was held on Wednesday, February 11, 2004, in the Rains Room of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California The meeting was called to order at 5 35 p m Present were Task Force members Mayor Pro Tem Diane Williams, Council Member Robert Howdyshell, and Planning Commissioners Cnstine McPhail and Pam Stewart Staff present were Brad Buller, City Planner, Kevin Ennis, Assistant City Attorney • : • s B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ..... C ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION C1 DISCUSSION OF SCOPE OF REVIEW Brad Buller, City Planner, explained the format of the Task Force Mayor Pro Tem Williams explained her concerns with the name of the Task Force used on this agenda and suggested it be modified to reflect her concern for the histoncal context of the area to be reviewed Mr Buller presented exhibits that identified historic landmarks and vacant or under-developed parcels in the area of possible review He reviewed the size and existing zoning of nine areas along Etiwanda Avenue and Base Line Road Mike Rue, Marketplace Partners, 13522 Newport Avenue, #100, Tustin, requested that Area 6 be identified by Mr Buller be excluded from the discussion because of the pending Conditional Use Permit currently in process John Mannerino, attorney representing Marketplace Partners, 9333 Base Line Road, #110, Rancho Cucamonga, also asked that Area 6 be excluded because of the existing Development Agreement covenng this property Jan Sutton, President, Etiwanda Historic Society, 972 East Washington Boulevard, Upland, did not agree with excluding this area and expressed her desire that the entire area be studied C~ Chuck Buquet, 10681 Foothill Boulevard, #395, Rancho Cucamonga, representing Marketplace Partners, suggested that more details be shown on the exhibits presented by Mr Buller DRC2003-00504 SUBTPM16237 Exhlblt "L" ~~ ~ ~ ,3~ Mr Buller explained it was a timing issue and that the maps created include the latest data currently in our geographic information system and that is why he also posted the tract map exhibit showing existing lots in the Arbors protect John Mornsette, American Beauty, 16830 Ventura Boulevard, Enano, explained his company's support for the protect in process in Area 6 He noted concem with how the timing and scope of this Task Force will affect Marketplace Partners' ability to move forward with their protect Pete Pitassi, architect for Fdippi Winery, 8439 White Oak, #105, Rancho Cucamonga, stated his support for the formation and scope of the Task Force Mayor Pro Tem Williams presented some of her concerns with the vanous uses that are being considered in the area of study notlust Area 6 Mr Rue believed that of all of the nine areas identified by staff, their site is different because it is the only one governed by a Development Agreement Mr Mannenno commented it should be everyone's goal to live up to the contract of the Development Agreement Mr Mornsette suggested that the focus should be to address Area 6 first because of the pending application currently going through the process Commissioner Stewart acknowledged the importance of Area 6 and agreed that in pnonty of discussion, the Task Force should discuss Area 6 first Mayor Pro Tem W illiams expressed her interest in seeing spectacular development of properties in the area of the study and that is why she asked for formation of the Task Force Ms Sutton said that the plans she has seen for Area 6 look like every other center She said the Histonc Society is looking for a speaalty center She noted her concem that the area is losing its histonc structures to rooftops She was not opposed to retail uses in Area 6 Council Member Howdyshell agreed with Ms Sutton and was not opposed to retail uses in Area 6 but noted that it must be integrated with the histonc winery He said the plans he had seen did not incorporate the two sites and their uses well Gino Filippi, Fdippi Winery, 12467 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, did not think the uses proposed for Area 6 are appropnate adjacent to the winery Mr Buquet restated his client's interest in working with the Fdlipis on a plan that can work ,.,._ D. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING After some more discussion about options for the planning of Area 6, the Task Force agreed to adloum the meeting because of time and reconvene on Tuesday, February 17, 2004, at 5 00 p m for the purpose of further discussions on the planning of Area 6 It was stated that Marketplace Partners will present their latest proposal and representatives of the winery will be asked to comment on the plans Etiwanda/Base Line Histonc Study Task Force Minutes page 2 February 11, 2004 ~~ ~ ~ 3~ Mr Pitassi expressed his concern that the Task Force not lose sight of the bigger picture He felt the bigger picture should be discussed before the focus on Area 6 .,,., E. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adtoumed at 6 40 p m Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner Approved March 2, 2004 Etiwanda/Base Line Histonc Study Task Force Minutes February 11, 2004 ~, r ~ 3a Page 3 February 17, 2004 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ETIWANDA/BASE LINE HISTORIC STUDY TASK FORCE MINUTES Speaal Meeting A. CALL TO ORDER A special meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga Etiwanda Base Line Historic Study Task Force was held on Tuesday, February 17, 2004, in the Rains Room of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, Califorrna The meeting was called to order at 535pm Present were Task Force members Mayor Pro Tem Diane Williams, Council Member Robert Howdyshell, and Planning Commissioners Cnstine McPhail and Pam Stewart Staff present were $rad Buller, City Planner, Nancy Fong, Senior Planner, Kevin Enrns, Assistant City Attorney ...., B PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS f t t f R C. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION Brad Buller, City Planner, explained that the purpose of the Task Force meeting was to have continued discussion regarding the historic winery and the proposed commeraal center He mentioned that the applicant, Mike Rue of Marketplace Partners and Gino Filippi Winery have met to discuss the development issues Mike Rue, Marketplace Partners, 13522 Newport Avenue, #100, Tustin, confirmed that there was a meeting He stated they did not talk about the design of the protect at the meeting He mentioned that 95 percent of the conversation was centered on the appropriate uses for the site He stated that Gino Filippi had told him he has no problem with Henry's Market but that he wanted to see a specialty center with pedestrian oriented destination type of uses He then stated that 75 percent of the tenants he is after is service oriented which are not destination- type uses Mr Rue continued to explain what makes a retail protect work and what doesn't He commented that the customers and the traffic-counts have to be there with a high level of tourism in order to have a successful specialty center He sled examples of specialty centers where they have those criteria City Walk m Universal City, downtown La Jolia, and Laguna Beach He further stated if the area had been developed as a wine country, a specialty center might also make sense He then stated that this site does not have a consistent draw of tourists ~, ~ X33 Mr Buller asked Gino Filippi to respond Gino Filippi, Filippi Winery, 12467 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, replied that it was true with regard to the fundamental disagreement They still believes that the site should be designed for a speaalty center with such uses as cafes, bookstores, restaurants, lots of courtyards and public spaces He referred to Chapter 7, page 16 of the Master Plan, which mentioned the winery integration theme He believed that the fundamental difference is that one is economic driven and the other is historic driven Mr Rue responded that the two different philosophies could be accomplished John Melcher, architect and a concemed resident, stated he was the one who help organized the design charrette back m 1999 He encouraged the two players to explore ways to strengthen the uses He suggested that the Task Force let the two players work together first Mr Buller responded that from day 1, City staff had encouraged the two players to work together Mayor Pro Tem Williams indicated how important it is to have the two sites appropriately integrate and work with each other Commissioner McPhail commented that tourists and customers visiting Victoria Gardens could be encouraged to move up to the winery site via Arbor Lane Commissioner Stewart commented that there is a larger picture that the Task Force needs to deal with The larger picture is the integration of the protect with the winery, the creation of an entry to Etiwanda, and for the site to provide convenience for the neighborhood . Mr Rue produced an overlay concept that showed a series of bwldings staggered adtacent to the north side of Henry's Market The concept also included continuous pedestrian spaces and connections to the winery James Banks, a concemed resident, clarified that convenience should not include drive-thru uses Mayor Pro Tem Williams stated that drive-thru uses themselves make a statement and attract a different user than she believes would be good for the site She also noted that certain service type uses bung signs, both permanent and temporary, that she believes would be problematic with the historical nature this center needs to reflect She believed that there are other places for drive-thru uses Mr Rue mentioned that he had compromised a lot with the design of the project and that he still needed to have a wable successful protect He informed the Task Force that Henry's Market has certain criteria, which is not to allow too many restaurants close to the store for parking purposes After more discussion on the possible features and uses where there is agreement, it was the consensus of the Task Force to continue to Tuesday, March 2 at 5 00 p m The Task Force encouraged the applicant to continue to work with the winery between now and the March 2nd meeting .,_.. Etiwanda/Base Lme Historic Study Task Force Minutes February 17, 2004 ~' r~ /+ 3 ~ Page 2 D. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING The Task Force agreed to continue their study of Area Six at the next meeting .,,, E. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adloumed at 6 35 p m Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner Approved March 24, 2004 C~ Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force Minutes February 17, 2004 ~, ~; G 35 Page 3 March 2, 2004 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ETIWANDA/BASE LINE HISTORIC STUDY TASK FORCE MINUTES Special Meeting A. CALL TO ORDER A special meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga Etiwanda Base Line Historic Study Task Force was held on Tuesday, March 2, 2004, in the Rains Room of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California The meeting was called to order at 510pm Present were Task Force members Mayor Pro Tem Diane Williams, Counalmember Robert Howdyshell, and Planning Commissioners Cnstme McPhail and Pam Stewart Staff present Brad Buller, City Planner, ,.... B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS a ~ ~ + w C. -ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION C1 Approval of Minutes February 11, 2004 (Speaal Meeting) C2 Discussion on Area Six (Continued from February 17, 2004) Brad Buller, City Planner, opened the meeting and invited the attendees to continue the discussion of Area six He invited Mr Rue to give his presentation. Mike Rue, of Marketplace Partners, 13522 Newport Avenue, #100, Tustin, gave a presentation and offered preliminary reductions of newly revised plans He reported that the Walgreen's drug store and fast food restaurant with drive-thru on have been removed from the revised plans. He added that an expanded view corridor of 70 feet has been provided between Bwldings G and H based upon the comments from the last meeting He reported that he made the assumption that the City will accept a decrease of the setback on Base Lme Road from 45 feet to 30 feet He noted that the setbacks on Day Creek and Madrigal have remained the same as what was originally presented He commented that because of an oversight, the setback for the winery property should have also been given a 30-foot setback as well to lend uniformity to the protect He commented that the biggest change is in the shape of Retail B bwlding He commented that it has been redesigned from a boxy look to more of a specialty look and feel with a generous plaza that can be a place for people to gather He noted elements such as a walking pattern that leads people from the shops back to the winery, lending interest to the entire center, a double water feature, a seating area, and decorative pavers He reported that with the significant grade differential, opportunities for raised planters and steps would be possible along ~, ~ G ~c~ • this plaza He added that the center reflects several different styles of architecture for interest with features such as towers, louvered shutters, trellis', and shade coverings He commented that the proposal includes mator changes in signage that would add a softer look to the development He referred to the site plan and commented that his design team believes this new look and features such as the budding arrangement and water element and seating will help attract restaurant uses and more specialty type tenants such as a teweler and gift store He suggested that more convenience type uses could be positioned near the south end of the center and hold off leasing the remaining spaces for the specialty type tenants He added that they met with Pete Pitassi and Gino Filippi lust prior to this meeting to look at the possibility to work together towards the future possibilities for their property in contunction with this center including a possible 2-lane country style road featuring rustic fenang up to the grapevines and signage that helps and encourages people to transition between the center and the winery He commented that the area for this type of access could be designated immediately Mr Buller thanked him for presenting some alternatives to the original design He asked for comments from Mr Pitassi and his team on the ideas presented Gino Filippi, Filippi Winery, 12467 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, acknowledged that he had met with Mr Rue at 4 00 p m and that Pete Pitassi had met them earlier to discuss the uses and the design Pete Pitassi, Pete Pitassi Architects, said they were encouraged with the direction and the elimination of the Walgreen's and the drive-thru but still have significant concerns with the uses HQ commented that he would prefer the conditions of approval for the Conditional Use Perrnit • "memorialize" what has been determined as appropriate uses including what is prohibited, locations on the site of certain uses, etc so that the issue does not have to be revisited at a later time He noted that the proposed plaza area is encouraging and they would like to see more of an easUwest orientation instead of a north/south orientation in accordance wdh the Master Plan and to foster the connection and speaal relationship between the two properties He stated that he believes the management of the property and issues of signage, graphics, and lighting details should be handled with the creaticrr of the initial documents and that they need to address these issues on a planning level first and then issues of architectural detail, building materials and massing for example, will come into play later, when all parties are comfortable - Mr Buller opened up the discussion to the Task Force for comments Jan Sutton, President, Etiwanda Historic Soaety, 972 East Washington Boulevard, Upland, stated that she believed that the focus of the Task Force was to not only be on this property but the other areas in Etiwanda as well that will be eventually developed She commented that there is a general lack of philosophy on how all these areas are to be developed and considering this development in detail is more difficult without this philosophy being established She noted she had attended a conference hosted by the California Assoaation Foundation where they discussed a Cultural Resources Survey where in the past the focus was on architecture and now the focus is more on the importance and the cultural importance conservancy of the original uses of historic buildings She added that we don't see many historic bwldings being rehabilitated to their original uses and the importance of wine industry as part of the culture of Rancho Cucamonga She commented that she would hate to see this area . become a "lost opportunity" to reflect the important cultural aspects of the area She noted that there had been some discussion about the development reflecting elements of City Walk, Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force Minutes page 2 March 2, 2004 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. Disneyland, or other large developments She remarked that she does not see that type of • development here, but that the ideas used in areas such as Claremont or Colorado Boulevard could be reflected in this development She noted the uses are really important and but what she keeps hearing from the design team is that it is a community center and the uses should be special and that they will try to do special retail but there is no commitment for that and it is for subtly, gwetly for convenience uses Jim Banks, a resident in Etiwanda, stated he agreed with Ms Sutton's comments He then handed out a draft proposal to the Task Force He proposed to establish an extra set of standards around historic sites or buildings to create a right environment for them The proposed standards would be more in spent with the Victoria Arbors Master Plan with regard to the winery Chuck Buquet, Charles Joseph Associates, 10681 Foothill Boulevard, Swte 395, Rancho Cucamonga, stated that the city should not be changing the standards in the midst of a protect The developer designed the protect in a good faith effort to City standards Mr Banks responded that the design was not in the spirit of the winery John Mannerino, Mannerino and Briguglio, stated that he is encouraged with the communication but mentioned that this is not a design rewew session Frank Lizarraga, attorney for Filippi Winery, commented that he had received a copy of the Development Agreement and the Master Plan for Victoria Arbors He noted that the master plan recognized the importance of the two parcels and has language that regwred the two parcels be master planned at a more refined level as "one protect " He added that the proposed • protect with the buildings backing up to the winery created two distinct protects and he could not see how it could be considered "one protect " Mr Rue responded that the Master Plan also list the types of uses that are permitted which includes a grocery store, and pharmacy Mr Buller responded that the points made by both sides are accurate He added that the goal is for the two properties to support and enhance each other He further added that the intention of the master plan is to bang the two properties together, master plan it with define uses and design continwty under the Conditional Use Permit He commented that the bigger question is how to relate and link the two properties, which the Task Force needs to discuss Mr Rue responded that he senses the design is not an issue and that the issue is over the uses Mayor Pro Tem Williams asked what would be the right uses and wrong uses She further asked Mr Rue what is his definition of convenience uses Mr Rue replied that the typical uses are those found in a neighborhood center with a supermarket, video, beauty salon, tewelry store, cafe, cleaners, etc Mr Buller suggested that the Conditional Use Permit allows the opportunity to define compatible uses by area within the center Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force Minutes March 2, 2004 Gl ~' ~ ~ Q~ Page 3 Commissioner Stewart commented that the opposition is to the uses She would like to see a list of defined uses She added that she is not sold on an easUwest orientation of the bwldings but there is the need for strong easUwest pedestrian linkages with an expanded courtyard into the winery property She further added that the proposed architecture reflected too close to Terra Vista Town Center and is not a distinctive one She suggested that the center provide space for the winery to have a winery gift shop Commissioner McPhail stated that she is encouraged with the communication between the two parties and pleased with the easUwest orientation of pedestrian spaces She stated she agreed with Pam's comments Counalman Howdyshell commented that he is pleased that the drive-thru uses are removed and that it appears the issue is down to the discussion of acceptable uses Mayor Pro Tem Williams stated that this issue did not come about last month, because she had raised it a year ago, and it has taken this long for someone to I~sten She added that she would like to see a seamless project between the two properties, and believed that it is an opportunity to create a specialty center not found elsewhere She further added that the architecture has to be different from the Terra Vista Town Center look ..... D. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING The Task Force members concurred that they would reconvene on Wednesday, March 24, at 5 00 p m to continue their discussion of Area Six 4 1 f R t E. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adtoumed at 6 40 p m Respectfully submitted, ad u ler City Planner Approved March 24, 2004 Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force Minutes March 2, 2004 ~' ~ ~ 1~ Page 4 DRAFT -FOR DISCUSSION ONLY March 24, 2004 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ETIWANDA/BASE LINE HISTORIC STUDY TASK FORCE MINUTES Speaal Meeting A. CALL TO ORDER A speaal meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga Etiwanda Base Line Histonc Study Task Force was held on Wednesday, March 24, 2004, in the Rains Room of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Dnve, Rancho Cucamonga, California The meeting was called to order at 535pm Present were Task Force members Mayor Pro Tem Diane Williams, Counal Member Robert Howdyshell, and Planning Commissioners Cristine McPhail and Pam Stewart Staff present were Brad Buller, City Planner, Nancy Fong, Senior Planner ..,.. B PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ._.,_ C. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION Brad Buller, City Planner, explained that this is a continuation from the last Task Force meeting with respect to Area 6 He mentioned that the Task Force has directed the applicant to work with staff and representatives of the winery in researching the types of uses that would fit better with the winery He continued that the applicant, Mike Rue, submitted a list of uses and list of methods to assure high standards of management control for the proposed center He invited Mike Rue to present the use list and management proposal Mike Rue, Marketplace Partners, 13522 Newport Avenue, #100, Tustin, gave an overview of the types of signs allowed and prohibited, and enforcement details for sign violations by tenants in the center He described that they will place speaalty tenants or destination type of tenants to bwidings A and B, which are closest to the future connection with the Filippi Winery He then cited some of the uses that will be prohibited from the center drug stores, fast food, service stations, convernence markets, video arcades, Laundromats, theft stores and commeraal recreation facilities He provided copies of his proposal to the Task Force, staff and_ representatives of the winery Mr Buller asked the Task Force to respond to the uses issue and the management proposal Commissioner Stewart commented that neon signs or lights are not allowed She expressed • concern with window signs and suggested more "teeth" in making sure those illegal window ~,F,G~D DRAFT -FOR DISCUSSION ONLY . signs are not allowed She commented that she liked the applicant's proposal of enforcing a $100 fine for tenants who put up illegal signs She also stated that the applicant should provide a much more detailed list of uses not allowed in the center John Mannerino, Mannerino and Briguglio, recommended that changes be made to the Victoria Arbors Master Plan and the Development Agreement so that it would become a public record for the prohibited uses Chuck Buquet, Charles Joseph Associates, 10681 Foothill Boulevard, Swte 395, Rancho Cucamonga, suggested changes be made to the Conditional Use Permit only Pete Pitassi, Pete Pitassi Architects, agreed with Mr Mannerino that the Master Plan needs to be modified to make sure there is ample control of the allowable uses He asked that the applicant come back with a more detailed list of uses that should be prohibited Mr Buller asked the Task Force whether there was a consensus that the protect is moving in the right direction regarding the uses and that the design issues should be forwarded back to the Planning commission He indicated the land use issues and the design issues could be worked on Commissioner Stewart indicated that she felt the design of the center has come a long way and that she believes there has been some excellent changes She supported the direction the design was going Commissioner McPhail agreed with Commissioner Stewart that the center is definitely better and heading in the right direction Councilman Howdyshell stated he liked the design and felt it interfaced well with the winery Mayor Pro Tem Williams commented that the protect is a strip center that got better Mr Buller summarized that the design of the protect could be referred back to Design Review, then forwarded to the Task Force for rewew before being forwarded to the Planning Commission for rewew and action He commented that this Task Force was to review the "big picture" issue for the area generally bounded by the mall, Base Line Road, Day Creek Boulevard, and generally along Etiwanda Avenue He mentioned that Mr Jim Banks had raised atywide concerns with uses adtacent to historic structures He recommended the Task Force rewew the areas of concern for the next meeting He suggested adtourning the meeting to April 28, 2004 Jim Banks, a concerned resident, suggested that the next area for rewew should be the area around the historic depot Mr Buller mentioned that notices would be mailed to invite all property owners for those areas that would be slated for rewew by the Task Force ._._. D. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING • Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force Minutes March 24, 2004 ~/ ~ n ~ I Page 2 DRAFT -FOR DISCUSSION ONLY The Task Force members concurred that they would reconvene on Wednesday, April 28, at 5 00 p m to continue their discussion of the Etiwanda Base Line area i i i i i E ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adtourned at 6 40 p m Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner Approved Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force Minutes March 24, 2004 ~ ~ ~ ~~ Page 3 ! i DRAFT -FOR DISCUSSION ONLY • May 18, 2004 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ETIWANDA/BASE LINE HISTORIC STUDY TASK FORCE MINUTES Special Meeting A. CALL TO ORDER A special meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga Etiwanda Base Line Historic Study Task Force was held on Tuesday, May 18, 2004, in the Rains Room of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California The meeting was called to order at 500pm Present were Task Force members Mayor Pro Tem Diane Williams, Council Member Robert Howdyshell, and Planning Commissioners Cnstine McPhail and Pam Stewart Staff present were Brad Buller, City Planner, Kewn Ennis, Assistant City Attorney .._.. B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS _.,.. C. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION Brad Buller, City Planner, explained to the Task Force that the meeting tonight is to review for informational purposes the design of the protect in Area 1, Marketplace He asked the applicant, Mike Rue to describe the protect design Mike Rue, Marketplace Partners, 13522 Newport Avenue, #200, Tustin, described the changes to the design, the hardscape connections, the architecture, the amenities, and the proposed signage Mr Buller mentioned that the protect has passed design review and would be forwarded to the July 14 Planning Commission meeting He also noted that staff would be initiating an amendment to the Master Plan to handle the prohibitive use issue Pete Pitassi, Pete Pitassi Architects, stated they have worked out the issues and they are in support of the protect Commissioners Stewart and McPhail stated they are in support of the protect design Councilmember Howdyshell stated he is also in support of the protect • ...,_ ~,F,~j~3 DRAFT -FOR DISCUSSION ONLY D. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING • Brad Buller, City Planner, stated that the Task Force would reconvene when there is additional information submitted for any of the remaining areas in consideration • x r E. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was ad/ourned at 6 20 p m Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner Approved n LJ • Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force Minutes Page 2 May 18, 2004 ~ ~ ~ ~~ Revised April 30, 2004 PROPOSED METHODS TO ASSURE HIGH STANDARDS OF OPERATION AND QUALITY OF TENANTS Project at SEC of Day Creek Blvd. and Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA (Revisions and Additions are Italicized) BACKGROUND At their meeting of March 2, 2004, the Task Force asked that staff and the applicant consider means to assure that the development and long-term operation of the proposed protect will meet and comply with the spirit, intent and regulations of the Victoria Arbors Master Plan It was agreed that the success of this protect would depend on the specific uses that locate in this center and the daily management of those uses The goal is that any new protect will work with and build upon the historic value and use of the winery I. HIGH OPERATING STANDARDS: The protect applicant shall enforce and abide by the following rules and regulations in the operation of the commercial protect 1 Exterior Signs and Advertising (a) A Sign Program and a Street and Plaza Furniture Master Plan shall be reviewed prior and approved concurrently with the Conditional Use Permit for the Center All tenants shall be required to use only approved furnishings and signs (b) The Sign Program shall require and depict signs that have a historic nature in appearance (e g smaller tenant budding signs with a sandblasted wood appearance with exterior illumination using gooseneck lights) No sign shall be allowed that will detract from the historic context of this protect and the adtacent winery (c) Within 30 days of cessation of business by a protect occupant all signs shall be removed and the exterior budding or monument sign surface patched and painted to match the finish and color of the adtacent surface (d) Exposed raceways are not permitted Exposed function boxes, lamps, tubing or neon crossovers of any type are not permitted (e) There shall be no signs that are flashing, moving or audible DRC2003-00504 SUBTPM16237 ~ r~~~~ ~S Exhibit "M" (f) No sign shall protect above or below the sign area designated in the Sign Program (g) Signs on or affixed to trucks, automobiles, trailers or other vehicles which advertise, identify or provide direction to a use or activity not related to its lawful activity are prohibited (h) Light bulb strings are prohibited (i) "Sandwich boards", "billboards", or "A-frame signs" are prohibited ~) Banners shall comply with the City Sign Ordinance in all respects and shall be professional and tasteful 2 Interior Signs and Advertising (a) Painting of signs or images on the interior or exterior of windows is prohibded (b) Neon signs placed against window areas are prohibited (c) Temporary interior window signs shall be limited as speafied in the City Sign Ordinance, and shall be professionally and tastefully prepared (d) Signs that are flashing, moving or audible are prohibited - (e) Permanent signs affixed to windows shall be attached to the interior side only and shall comply with the City-approved Sign Program and the City Sign Ordinance (f) The proh~bi6on and limitation of signs and other items ~n window areas shall extend for a distance of five (5) feet behind window areas 3 Sidewalks Plaza Areas Parkina Lot and Landscaped Areas (a) Outdoor sales in sidewalk and plaza areas are prohibited. This prohibition shall not apply to kiosks, the anchor tenant of the protect or chartable organizations such as the Girl Scouts (b) Parking lot sales are prohibited except for seasonal sales (e g. Christmas trees) by the anchor tenant which are permitted under such tenant's lease agreement and are limited as specified in the City Zoning Ordinance (c) Occupants of the protect shall not place any items such as furniture or trash receptacles in sidewalk or plaza areas unless such items are approved by the property owner and are consistent with a protect-wide extenorfurniture program ~,F~S~Io f. Page 2 . 4 Service and Delivery Areas and Trash Areas (a) No exterior storage of boxes, cartons, pallets or similar items is permitted (b) All trash shall be placed in trash bins which are to be kept in designated trash enclosures (c) All deliveries shall be limited to appropriate delivery areas specified on the City-approved site plan (d) Delrvenes shall be limited to the hours of 7 am to 10 pm 5 Enforcement of Operating Standards Relating to Signs and Furnishing The developer shall agree to aggressively enforce all site furnishing regulations and signs for the businesses in their center A violation provision shall be a part of every signed lease for any business occupying space on or _ within the center It shall be specifically noted m the lease agreement that violations of these provisions (continuing after a reasonable cure period for the tenant and its lender) shall be grounds for terminating the lease Further, the developer will not rely on the City to process enforcement of violators If enforcement does not occur after a reasonable cure period (including time to • allow the developer to secure legal access to the tenant's premises), the developer, not the business, shall be subtect to a $100 fine, per day, per violation Repeated violations of these provisions without good faith attempts to cure such violations would be grounds for revocation of the center's - Conditional Use Permd II. QUALITY TENANTS 1 Overall Leasing and Marketing Philosophy The goal of the protect applicant shall be to attract a higher level of merchant who is appreciative of the historic nature of the Filippi Winery and the surrounding area -Though many of the project tenants are expected to offer goods and services which would be categorized as "neighborhood serving",-priority will be given to attracting tenants whose businesses are winery related or complementary to the winery-theme of the protect 2 Placement of Tenants within the Shopping Center In leasing space within the center, the protect applicant will exercise diligence • in concentrating "neighborhood serving" uses in buildings other than Buildings A and B Page 3 The protect applicant will attempt to solicit uses of a specialty and/or destination nature for Buildings A and B, which are the closest to the future connection with the Filippi Winery 3 Favored Types of Uses The project applicant is encouraged to locate the following uses within the Shopping Center, especially m Buildings A and B Sit down restaurant Florist or flower shop Jewelry store Book store Art shop Clothing store Coffee house Gift shop Greeting cards store Houseware boutique Camera store ~4 Prohibition of Certain Tyaes of Uses • Though all of the following uses are either permitted or conditionally permitted under the Village Center Commercial section of the Victoria Arbors Master Plan, the protect applicant is agreeable to omitting them from the Shopping Center Drug store with dnve thru Fast food restaurant with dnve thru Automotive service stations Convernence markets Video arcades Automotive coin-op washing Automotive automatic washing Automotive stations offering minor repair such as tune-ups, brakes, batteries, tires, mufFlers Commercial recreation facilities bowling alley, theater, billiards and outdoor uses Theft store Self-serwce Laundromat Small family day care in the home, providing care for six (6) or less persons Club, lodge, fraternity and sorority • ~,1<G yg Page 4 Convalescent center Large family day care in the home, providing care for 7-12 persons Outdoor recreation RV, mini-storage Animal care factlity Feed and tack stores Janitorial services and supplies Mortuaries and cemeteries Transportation facilities (train and bus, taxi depots) Private and public clubs and lodges, mclud~ng YMCA, YWCA and simtlar youth groups ~, F G ~f9 Page 5 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7 40 p m Nancy Fong May 4, 2004 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003-00504 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to develop a retail center on approximately 9 acres of land within the Mixed Use Distract of the Victoria Arbors Master Plan located at the southeast corner of Base Lme Road and Day Creek Boulevard - APN 0227-161-39 Design Parameters On March 24, 2004, the Base Line/Etiwanda Task Force accepted the changes to the protect design and directed the applicant to proceed in preparing detailed plans to be submitted for Design Review Committee reviewed The applicant stated that he would prepare the Conceptual Site Plan, Elevations, and Plaza Design for Committee review for this meeting to make sure that the protect meets the design directions of the Committee The applicant understands that additional detailed plans may have to be prepared for further Committee review The applicant also understands that detailed plans of all technical items would have to be prepared for staff and Task Force review before scheduling the protect for Planning Commission review. PLANS WILL BE AVAILABLE AT THE MEETING AND STAFF WILL PRESENT AN ORAL REPORT Design Review Committee Action: Members Present Fletcher, Stewart Staff Planner Nancy Fong The applicant presented the protect design to the Committee. He described how each bwldmg design was modeled after winery bwldings in Napa Valley He showed the speafic Napa Valley winery building and compared to each proposed building design (Buildings B through H). He pointed out that there is no bwldmg design proposed for Building A yet He walked the Committee through the plazas at the corner and along the front of the buildings describing the details, the materials, and amenities being proposed He showed the Committee a concept of sign program that was not the typical illuminated channel letters signs He stated that he was in the process of refining the proposed sign program, which would be unique and exceptional The Committee thanked the applicant for working with the Etiwanda Task Force (ETF) m addressing the many issues The Committee stated they were very happy with the design direction of the protect and commended the applicant of designing a high quality protect that the City would be proud of The Committee recommended approval of the proposed design with the following comments The protect should be forwarded to the ETF for review 2 from Base Lme Road and the w nleryh ThecColmmittee (recommended add tlolnalltreatment such as, but not limited to, roof overhang, architectural details, etc be provided DRC2003-00504 SUBTPM16237 ~, ~ Cy Jr0 Exhibit "N" DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2003-00504 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES May 4, 2004 Page 2 3 The Committee recommended that the backside of the towers for Bwldmgs B and C to have the same level of treatment as the front 4 The Committee stated that the detailing and the architectural elements were very important in making this a quality protect and asked the applicant to prowde details of the architectural elements for their review The Committee reiterated that the Sign Program need to be unique and not the typical signs that one might fmd in a neighborhood center ~~C~I Charles Joseph Associates PUBLIC/PRIVATE SECTOR MANAGEMENT SERVICES LJ for Market Place Day Creek. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this code: The obiective of this code is to provide unrform budding setback along the public streetscapes as part of the community master plan It was decided during much intense review wdh Planning Staff, Planning Commissioner workshops and Victona Arbors task force that the Marketplace Day creek site should provide a building setback consistent with the Historic Fllippi Winery that would be consistent with the adiacent developments and not provide an undue hardship to our property for not allowing development within the 45' In essence, the protect is exchanging the setback typically required along Baseline to be allocated to the interior pedestrian plaza between retail buildings of the Retail Center We are requesting a variance from the above development code for buildings "A" and "H" to accommodate the design suggestions by staff Our site needs the proposed setback vananceto meet the visual intimacy of the Victoria Arbors vision and to be consistent with the adiacent Winery 2 That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone: No, in fact the granting of the said variance will provide a smoother transition from our protect setback to the 5' setback of the Historic Fllippi Winery We have looked at addressing the challenges presented by this site layout keeping in mind the intent of the Development Code in regards to zoning requirements and adiacent zoning properties as well as design suggestions from the DRC in regards to connection of said properties This request is consistent with the adjacent property zoning The variance requested does not conflict with zoning regulations DRC2003-00504 Office 909.48]•]822 soo•2ao•1822 Fax 909.481.1824 S U BTPM 16237 er • 10681 Foothill Blvd , Smte 395 • Rancho Cucamonga, CA • 91730 A CALIFORNIA CORPORA170N Exhibit "O" ~~ F,~G $a g. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same zone: The granting of this vanance will have no effect on the adjacent neighborhood except to enhance their view by connecting the proposed development with the existing development along baseline 4. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grarrt of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same zone: No, there are no specal pnwleges giving to our site for this vanance within the Victoria Arbors Master Plan Village designation. The area in question is actually located near the intimate setback of the Fdippi Winery commercial use, which will also allow for future setback reductions Therefore, granting this vanance will allow us to help maintain the character and consistency of the neighboring Fihppi Winery 5. That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public heath, safety or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. No, this vanance is needed to meet the intent of the Victoria Arbors Master plan and will allow for safe access through the interior of the site during their shopping experience The setback variance in question will only enhance the wsuat continuity to the improvements currently under construction along Baseline in relationship to the existing Winery n ~, ~; ~ 53 PITASSI ARCHITEC~ifx,pp~ANCH000CAMONGA April 5, 2004 Mr Brad Buller Gty Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Gvic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 AFR 0 62004 RECEIVED -PLANNING Subject Marketplace Properties Proposed Shopping Center rel Daycreek Blvd. and Base Line Road Dear Brad• At the Task Force meeting of March 24, 2004, Marketplace Properties discussed a letter which they submitted to you and which we reviewed on March 23'a. In response to discussion at the March 2'~ Task Force meeting, they are proposing to prohibit certain uses within the development at Daycreek Blvd and Base Lme Road We had indicated at the last Task Force meeting that we would like to submit our list of prohibited uses for this project. As you know, the Victoria Arbors Master Plan refers to allowed uses in the Village Center Commercial Designation under Chapter 3, Item C 2. Within this section, the Master Plan also refers to permitted and conditionally permitted uses listed under "Neighborhood Commercial" in the City's Development Code We have reviewed these uses and, attached to this letter, we have included an edited versidn of Section 17 10.030, pages 17 10-2 through 17.10-7. By using an "N.A." notation,we have indicated which "N.C." permitted and conditionally permitted allowed uses should be prohibited from the Village Center Commercial in Victoria Arbors In addition to the items listed in the letter prepared by Marketplace Properties, we suggest additional revisions to the Victoria Arbors Master Plan as noted on the attached copy of Chapter 3, pages 9 through 12. Brad, we appreaate the concessions which have been offered by Marketplace Properties, and we suggest the attached list to further strengthen the description within the Master Plan of a project which will be reminiscent of a "Winery Estate" (see Chapter 7, pages 16-18). We have indicated throughout this process that certain uses are simply inappropriate in order to maintain consistency with the image and description referred to in the Master Plan We believe that the only way DRC2003-00504 SUBTPM16237 ~~ ~~ 5`~ EXHIBIT "P" • fl499 White Oak Avn StP 105 • Ranrhn CuCamon¢a CA 97730 C~ Mr Brad Buller, City Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga • April 5, 2004 Page 2 to assure a mix of services and products consistent with this image is to prohibit the uses noted In addition to prohibiting certain uses, we suggest that the document encourage the types of uses which strengthen this image. We also believe that the Master Plan should include the opportunity to develop live/work lots for artists or other professionals again consistent with the "Winery Estate" image. While Irve/work lofts may not be of interest to Marketplace Properties, they may be appropriate to consider in the future development of the winery property. Brad, we thank you again for the continued opportunity to participate in the process Preserving the winery property, by closely scrutinizing any development proposed along its perimeter, is critical to assuring the enhancement of the City"s investment in their heritage. We look forward to your thoughts regarding the recommendations we have put forward in this letter and on the attachments. ~_1 PJP:cas Enclosures c: Gino Filippi, w/enclosures Frank Lizarraga, w/enclosures Jim Banks, w/enclosures ~, F, G 55 President (7) Public buildings • (S) All dyne-through uses (9) Accessory structures and uses necessarti• or cusromarily madental to the above uses as speafically provided for m the use permit (10) Condinonally permuted Community Faaluies listed below (11) Shopping Centers subject to provision and approval of a master plan/ conceptual development plan - (12) Service Business, including but not limited to • auromobile repair ~ Service facil- nes • mortuaries • mechanical auto wash c Sire Development Standards -Per Develop- ment Code 2 VILLAGE CENTER COM~~iERCIAL a The following genera] categories of uses shall be permuted (1) Retail business, including but not limned to • grocery stores • meat markets, delicatessens • produce markets a.,.,. _..._,,. -~s~~~-• • dry good stores • hardware sales -'-e~s- • dothing scores • florist shops - ' / ~~ LAND USE CHAPTER 3 9 VICTORIA ARBORS MASTER PL4'v LJ (3) Service businesses, mcludmg but nor hmaed to • Banks, finanaal Insutunons • locksmiths I ' ' -- -'-'-.-" ----ra,a,= i a, ~iia~ 1G __ 1_ ._ 1. __ ~ 1 I t+ (3) Administrative and professional offices (4) Governmental offices (~) Restaurants other than fast food, mcludmg madental serving of beer and wine but without a cocktail lounge, bar, entertainment or dancing (6) Accesson structures and uses necessan or cusromanh incidental ro the above a provided for m the Rancho Cucamonga Zoning Ordinance ~~ f.-.~ (7) Permuted uses listed under \eighborhood Commercial m the De~elopmenr Code A5 AM£-~rro~ it-No Nar£v. b Uses permitted sub~ecr ro specific approval of a Condinonal Use Permit (~) Restaurants with entertainment and/or serving of alcoholrc beverages (6) Al] drne-through uses dN~Y f7N!*NGI/C!, /N577'(7i77o~.rS WCTN- nwvs-77rreu CoNo/7~eN/tZ- fi.L6lU~D ~c . u. /.~ 'FDf~ SotITN ~~RT7~N aF V/(•f~l-6E G~NT~R 10 CHAPTER 3 LAND USE ~ ~ ~ ~~ VICTORIA ARBORS b1ASTER PLAY (7) Shopping cen[ers subject co provision and approval of a master plan/ conceptual development plan (8) Condinonally permitted Community Facilities fisted below (9) Condinonal permitted uses listed under Neighborhood Commeraal m the Development Code /}5 /¢-7H,~NpG~O /YNO NbT~v c. Site Development Standards -Per Devel- opment Code D. MIXED USE COMMUNITY FACILITIES The Communuy Facilities section of the Victoria Arbors Master Plan is established to provide for _ community support uses and those addaional uses which are found to be compatible with the basic permitted uses by [he Site Plan Re~ieN Process procedure ~~r~ ~~ vir~r.~E ~~ ~~~~~ a Uses Permitted (1) The following uses shall be permitted wtthm Residential and Commeraal Land Use areas in Victoria Arbors. • Public Park and Playground • General Open Space uses • Accessory structures and uses necessary or customarily incidental to the above as provided for in the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code ~', F, ~ 58 LAND USE CHAPTER 3 1 1 VICTORIA ARBORS MASTER PLAv • b Condmonalh Permated Uses (2) The following uses shall be permured wahm Residential or Commeraal Land Use areas m Victona Arbors subject to the Conditional Use Permn process • Church • Pubbc faaLry, such as, but not limited to, avic and community buildings > - -1~~- .~-. a, ~ ----~ • Fire and police station n a - • Schools, prnate and parochial • Unht~ or service faalit~ • Hisronc landmarked w inen consist- ing of manufacturing, pressing, blending and boalmg of wine, and _ including accessory uses such as, but not Lmaed to, retail sales, wine tasnng, banyuet faahn, restauran[s, and other uses as found by the Planning Commission to be consis[ent with the sprint or inrent of a hutonc winery si[e ~• c Si[e Development S[andards -Per Develop- i 12 CHAPTER 3 LAND USE ~/ ~ ~ ~~ VICTORIA ARBORS MASTER PLAN Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Sections 1710 020 & 1710 030 C General Commercial Distract (GCl This distract is intended for general commeraal activities and services of a more intensive nature These uses would be located pnmarily along mator transportation routes and would include major shopping faalities, major service-onented uses, mator finanaal and corporate headquarters which are designed to serve the City or the region as a whole Section 17.10.030 -Use Regulations Uses listed m Table 17 10 030 shall be allowable m one or more of the commeraal distracts as indicated in the columns beneath each commeraal distract Where indicated with the letter "P," the use shall be a permitted use in that distract Where indicated with the letter "C," the use shall be a cond~onal use subtect to the Conditional Use Permit process In the event there is difficulty in categorizing a given use in one of the distracts, the procedure outlined in Section 17 02 040 shall be followed Table 17.10.030 -Use Regulations for CommerciallOffice Districts Use OP NC GC A Offices and Related Uses 1 Administrative and executive offices P P P 2 Artist and photographic studios, not including the P P p sale of egwpment or supplies 3 Clerical and professional offices P P P 4 Finanaal services and institubons, including P p p drive-through banks 5 Medical, dental, and related health services (non- animal related), including laboratories and clinics, P P p only the sale of articles clearly inadental to the services provided shall be permitted g Prescription pharmaaes, (also when located ~ •~ j within a bwldmg contammg the offices of 5 or P /Y P more medical pracbdoners) 7 Public buildings (aty and county bwidmgs, P P p speaal distracts, and post office) S Public utthty sernce offices P P P g Public safety faaiity (police, fire, ambulance and C C C paramedics) 10 Related commeraal uses (blueprinting, stationary, gwck copy, etc) when madental to an P P P office bwldmg or complex P = Permdted Use ,~ /~ / _~ C =Conditional Use Permit n:gwred i / i 7V (j/ 17 10-2 10/00 • • C Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 1710 030 Use OP NC GC B General Commercial Uses 1 Antique shops - P P 2 Ammal Care Faahty (animal hospital, vetennanan, commeraal kennel, grooming) N a Excluding extenor kennel, pens, or runs C iP~ P b Including extenor kennel, pens, or runs - - C 3 Apparel stores - P P 4 Art, music, and photographic studios and supply P P P stores - N~ P 5 Appliance stores and repair 6 Arcades (see speaal requirements per Section _ Nom. C 1710030F) 7 Athletic and Health Club, gyms, and weight P p p reduang clinics g Automotive sales and services (including motorcycles, boats, trailers, and campers) a Sales C - C b Rentals - C c Repairs (major engine work, muffler shops, _ _ C painting, body work, and upholstery) N d Coin-op washing ~ ~e% c N e Automatic washing C ~ C f Service or gasoline dispensing stations /t. ~ (including minor repair such as tune-ups, C ~ P brakes, battenes, tires, mufflers) N~ P g Parts and supplies - h Tire sales and service (no outdoor - _ p storage) g Bakenes (retail only) - P P 10 Barber and beauty shops P N P 11 Bicycle shops - P P P = Permdted Use C = Cond~honal Use Penmt 2gmred 17 10-3 ~,FG(o/ 10/00 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 1 i 10 030 Use OP NC GC 12 Bluepnnt and photocopy services P N' P 13 Book, gift and stationary stores (other than adult P P P related matenal) 14 Candy stores and confectionanes - P P 15 Catenng establishments - - P 16 Cleaning and pressing establishments P P 17 Carpenter shop or cabinet shop - - P 18 Cocktail lounge (bar, lounge, tavern) including related entertainment a Operated independent of a restaurant C _ - C b Accessoryto a restaurant C C C 19 Commeraal recreation faalities a Indoor uses such as bowling, theaters, C /~. , V~ P billiards, etc b Outdoor uses such as golf, tennis, C /~l. f~ /° C basketball, baseball, trampolines, etc 20 Dairy product stores - P P 21 Delicatessens - P P 22 Department stores - - P 23 Dnve-in businesses, including theaters (other - n/, f,~ ~ C than fast food restaurants) J 24 Drug stores and pharmacies P N• P 25 Egwpment rental yards - - C 26 Electronic goods (i a N's, stereos, radios, n/-/~ ~ P VCR's) sales and service / 27 Fast-food restaurants C N~ P 28 Feedlfack stores - ~ P 29 Flonst shops P P P 30 Food stores and supermarkets - P P 31 Furniture stores, repair and upholstery - ~ P P =Permitted Use C = Condihonal Use Permit required ~~ 17 16 4 10/00 n LJ u • Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 1 i 10 030 Use OP NC GC 32 General retail stores - P P 33 Hardware stores - P P 34 Home improvement centers a Material stored and sold within enclosed buildings b Outdoor storage of matenal such as lumber and building materials N~ P C 35 Hotels and Motels C - P 36 Ice Machines (outdoor) - ^/~ P 37 Janitorial services and supplies - P 38 Jewelry stores - P P 39 Laundry self-service - Nf~ P 40 Liquor stores - N~' C 41 Kiosks for key shops, film drops, etc in parking lots ^/~ P 42 Locksmith shop - P P 43 Massage establishments - - C 44 Mini-storage for public use (no outdoor storage) - - C 45 Mortuaries and cemeteries C N ~ C 46 Music, dance, and martial arts studio - N' P 47 Newspaper and magazine stores P P P 48 Nurseries and garden supply stores, provided, in the NC district, all egwpment, supplies and matenal are kept within an enclosed area, and provided that ferhl¢er is stored in packaged form only - P P 49 Office and business machine stores P ~ P 50 Office supply stores P - P 51 Parking faali4es (commercial) where fees are charged P - P 52 Pawn Shops - - C P = Permdted Use C = Cond~Gonel Use Permit required n 1o-s ~, F, G b3 10/00 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 1710 030 Use OP NC GC 53 Pet shop - /" P 54 Political or philanthropic headquarters P P P 55 Plumbing shop and supplies - - P 56 Photocopy P N• P 57 Punting shops - - P 58 Recreational Vehicle Storage Yard - - C 59 Restaurants (other than fast food) a With entertainment and/or cocktail lounge and bar b Incidental serving of beer and wine but without a cocktail lounge, bar, entertainment, or dancing C P C P C P 60 Shoe stores, sales and repair - P P 61 Second-hand store - /U/~' C 62 Shopping Center sub/ect to provisions in Section 17 10 030-F 4 _ C C 63 Spintualist readings or astrology forecasting - - P 64 Sporting goods stores - /° ~ P 65 Stamp and coin shops - P P 66 Swimming pool supplies - N ~ P 67 Tailor - P P 6g Taxidermists - - P 69 Thnft Store - N•~ C 70 Toy stores - P P 71 Travel agenaes P P P 72 Transportation facilities (train and bus, taw depots) C N~i C 73 Truck and trailer rental, sales and service - - C 74 Vanety stores - ~ P P =Permitted Use C = Conditional Use Permit regwrnd n ia-s loioo • • r1 u r1 U Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 1710 030 Use OP NC GC C Public and semi-public uses A' ff l Y 1 Day Care Faalities C . ' R" C 2 Convalescent facilities P - P 3 Hospitals C - C 4 Pnvate and public clubs and lodges, including C ~l/ 1~ /` C YMCA, YWCA, and similar youth group uses 5 Educational institutions, parochial, pnvate C C C (including colleges and universities) 6 Libranes & museums, public or private P P P 7 Parks and recreation facddies, public or pnvate C C C 8 Public utility installations C C C 9 Vocational or business trade schools C C C 10 Churches, convents, monasteries, and other C C C religious nsttutons D Accessory Uses 1 Accessory structures and uses customarily incidental to a permitted use and contained on P P P the same site 2 Accessory structures and uses customarly incdental to a conditional use and contained on C C C the same site 3 Caretakers residence P P P 4 Amusement Devices, per Section 17 10 030-F P N• ~ P E Temporary Uses 1 Temporary uses as prescnbed in Section P P P 17 04 070 and subtect to those provisions 2 Temporary office modules, subtect to provisions C C C in Section 17 10 030-F 3 P =Permitted Use C =Conditional Use Permd regwred n X0-7 ~~ ~. ~ ~oS loioo RESOLUTION NO 04-85 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO SUBTPM16237, A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE 9 23 ACRES OF LAND INTO 8 PARCELS FOR THE PURPOSE OF DEVELOPING A COMMERCIAL CENTER IN THE MIXED USE DISTRICT OF THE VICTORIA ARBORS MASTER PLAN, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND DAY CREEK BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0227-161-39 A Recitals 1 Charles Joseph Associates for Marketplace Partners filed an application for the approval of Tentative Parcel Map No SUBTPM16237, as descnbed in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subtect Tentative Parcel Map request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 14th day of July 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and concluded said heanng on that date All legal prerequisites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occun•ed B - Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng on July 14, 2004, including wntten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to property located at the southeast comer of Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard with a street frontage of approximately 2,100 feet (along Day Creek Boulevard) and lot depth of 716 feet and which is presently improved undeveloped b The properties to the north are single-family homes, the properties to the south are single-family homes under construction, the property to the east is Joseph Filippi Winery, and the property to the west is undeveloped c The proposed protect with its site design, elevations, and intended use complies with the deign guidelines of the Victona Arbors Master Plan d The proposed protect with the Vanance conforms to the standards and regulation of the Development Code and the Victona Arbors Master Plan in terms of setbacks and parking e The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Designation, the Victona Arbors Village of the Victona Community Plan, and Victona Arbors Master Plan ~,~;G~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-85 SUBTPM16237 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES/MARKETPLACE PARTNERS July 14, 2004 Page 2 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a The tentative parcel map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and b The design or improvements of the tentative parcel map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and c The site is physically swtable for the type of development proposed, and d The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat, and e The tentative parcel map is not likely to cause senous public health problems, and f The design of the tentative parcel map wall not conflict with any easement acgwred by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property vnthin the proposed subdivision 4 July 7, 1999, the City CounGl certified the Environmental Impact Report (State Cleannghouse No 98041137) as adequate and complete On December 20, 2000, the Gty CounGl adopted Facts and Findings and a Statement of Ovemding Considerations for approving the Vidona Arbors Land Use entitlements On March 21, 2001, the City Counal approved an addendum to the EIR (State Cleannghouse No 98041137) for approving the Victona Arbors Master Plan and the Tentative Parcel Map that created the parcel for the protect site Based on the Initial Study prepared by the Cites Environmental Consultant, LSA, Associates, Inc , it was determined that the protect descnbed above is within the scope of the certified EIR and addendum Further, it was determined that none of the elements set forth in Public Resources Code Section 21166 or Section 15162 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines (CEQA) exists and therefore no subsequent or supplemental Environmental Impact Report or Mitigated Negative peGaration rs regwred to be prepared 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Division 1) All conditions of approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00504 shall apply 2) The Covenants, Codes & Restnctions (CC&Rs) shall have reGprocel access and parlung and maintenance of landscaping and common plaza areas 3) The "Proposed Methods to Assure High Standards of Operation and Quality of Tenants" revised Apnl 20, 2004, shall be part of the CC&Rs PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-85 SUBTPM16237 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES/MARKETPLACE PARTNERS . July 14, 2004 Page 3 Engineenng Division 1) All conditions of approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00504 shall apply 2) All pertinent conditions of Tentative Tract 15974, Planning Commission Resolution No 01-25 and City of Rancho Cucamonga CFD 2001-01 shall apply 3) Base Une Road frontage improvements shall be installed in accordance with the Cdy "Ma1or Divided Artenal" standards as requred, including, but not limited to, curb, gutter, sidewalk, dnveway approaches, streetlights, street trees, signing, and stnping 4) The westbound left tum lane on Base Line Road at the easterly dnveway v~nll not be permitted Provide a full median at that location 5) Provide a separate nght tum lane for all dnveways on Base Line Road 6) The lane configuration on Base Line Road shall be 12 feet from the centerline to the south side of the median island, then 12 feet, 11 feet, and 11 feet thru lanes, 5-foot bike lane, and 11-foot bus bay/nght tum lane 7) Relocate or modify traffic signal equipment at Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard as required 8) Day Creek Boulevard frontage improvements shall be installed in accordance vwth the City "Mator Divided Artenal" standards as requred, inGuding, but not limited to, curb, gutter, sidewalk, dnveway approach, streetlights, street trees, signing, and stnping 9) The lane configuration on Day Creek Boulevard shall be 10-foot and 11-foot left tum lanes, then 11-foot, 11-foot, and 11-foot thru lanes, 5-foot bike lane, and an 11-foot nght tum lane 10) Provide a separate nght tum lane for the dnveway on Day Creek Boulevard 11) All dnve approaches shall be constructed per City Standard No 101 Type "C " 12) No pavers v~nll be permitted wnthin the public street nght-of-way at any dnveway entrance 13) A traffic signal at Day Creek Boulevard and Madngal Dnve shall be • installed and operational pnor to occupancy of any buildings ~; F, 4 (o$ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-85 SUBTPM16237 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES/MARKETPLACE PARTNERS July 14, 2004 . Page 4 14) Madngal Dnve frontage improvements shall be installed in accordance with the City "Collector' standards as required, including, but not limited to, curb, gutter, sidewalk, dnveway approach, streetlights, street trees, signing, and stnping 15) The Traffic Impact Analysis fair share traffic mitigation for improvements outside the City limits shall be proportionally paid pnorto each final map recordation Fair share amount for DRC2003-00504 is $18,141 33 16) A Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) is required and shall meet the approval of the City Engineer pnorto Grading Permit approval 17) Pnor to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable d at least 50 percent of all wastes generated dunng construction and demolition are diverted from landfills and appropnate documentation is provided to the City Forrn CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engmeenng Division when the first bwlding permit application is submitted to Building and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engmeenng Division within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or • demolition project 18) Provide for a reGprocal dnveway access for the properly immediatelyto the east (Hnnery property) The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF JULY 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Rich Macias, Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Plamm~g Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Plamm~g Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Plamm~g • Commission held on the 14th day of July 2004, by the follovng vote-to-wit ~, ~ G (09 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-85 SUBTPM16237 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES/MARKETPLACE PARTNERS July 14, 2004 Page 5 AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS ~, F ~ ~0 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16237 SUBJECT: WINERY ESTATE MARKETPLACE RETAIL CENTER APPLICANT: MARKETPLACE PARTNERS/CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES LOCATION: SEC BASE LINE ROAD AND DAY CREEK BOULEVARD ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACTTHE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: General Requirements 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the Ctty, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe regwred by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Approval of Tentative Parcel Map No SUBTPM16237 is granted subject to the approval of Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00504 and Variance DRC2004-00522 B. Time Limits This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval C. Site Development The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, the Victoria Arbors Master Plan, and the Victoria Community Plan SC-1-04 1 i \planning\final\pingwmm\subtpm16237cond7-14 doc ~~ ~ (' ~/ Comolefion Date -/-/- / / I I / / Prgect No SUBTPM 16237 Comolehon Dete Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all _/_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of bulding permit issuance All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property _/_/_ owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits C~ SC-1-04 Z~,~~~a RESOLUTION NO 04-86 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO DRC2003-00504, A REQUEST TO DEVELOP A VILLAGE COMMERCIAL CENTER CONSISTING OF 6 SPECIALTY RETAIL AND RESTAURANT BUILDINGS, 1 BANK, AND 1 SPECIALTY MARKET TOTALING 79,661 SQUARE FEET ON APPROXIMATELY 9 23 ACRES OF LAND WITHIN THE MIXED USE DISTRICT OF THE VICTORIA ARBORS MASTER PLAN, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND DAY CREEK BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0227-161-39 A Recitals 1 Charles Joseph Assonates for Marketplace Partners filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit No DRC2003-00504, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subtect Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 14th day of July, 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date 3 All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows. 1 This Commission hereby speafically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Rentals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on July 14, 2004, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to property located at southeast comer of Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard with a street frontage of approximately 2,100 feet (along Day Creek Boulevard) and lot depth of 716 feet and which is presently improved undeveloped b The properties to the north are single-family homes, the properties to the south are single-family homes under construction, the property to the east is Joseph Fdippi Winery, and the property to the west is undeveloped c The proposed project with its site design, elevations, and intended use complies with the deign guidelines of the Victoria Arbors Master Plan d The proposed protect with the Variance conforms to the standards and regulation of the Development Code and the Victoria Arbors Master Plan in tenns of setbacks and parking ~,~G ~3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-86 DRC2003-00504 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES/MARKETPLACE PARTNERS July 14, 2004 Page 2 e The proposed pro/ect is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Designation, the Victona Arbors Village of the Victona Community Plan, and the Victona Arbors Master Plan f The proposed protect and the intended use, togetherwith all conditions of approval will not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or matenally intunous to properties or improvements adtacent to the site 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng and upon the speafic findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the distnct in which the site is located b The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or maienally iniunous to properties or improvements in the vicinity c The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code 4 On July 7, 1999, the City Council certified the Environmental Impact Report (State Cleannghouse No 98041137) as adequate and complete On December 20, 2000, the City Councl adopted Facts and Findings and a Statement of Ovemding Considerations for approving the Vctona Arbors Land Use entitlements On March 21, 2001, the City Council approved an addendum to the EIR (State Cleannghouse No 98041137) for approving the Victona Arbors Master Plan and the Tentative Parcel Map that created the parcel for the protect site Based on the Initial Study prepared by the City's Environmental Consultant, LSA, Assoaates, Inc , it was determined that the protect descnbed above is within the scope of the certified EIR and addendum Further, it was determined that none of the elements set forth in Public Resources Code Section 21166 or Section 15162 of the California Environmental Quality Act Gwdelines (CEQA) exists and therefore no subsequent or supplemental Environmental Impact Report or Mitigated Negative Declaration is regwred to be prepared 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subiect to each and every conddion set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Dnnsion 1) This approval is granted contingent upon approval of the related Vanance DRC2004-0522 2) All pertinent conditions of approval for Development Agreement DA 00-04 shall apply 3) All pertinent conditions of approval for Victona Arbors Master Plan DR 01-04 and as amended from time to time shall apply 4) All pertinent conditions of approval for Tentative Parcel Map 15641 shall apply ~, ~; ~ ~-~ r1 L.._.J L_ J PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-86 DRC2003-00504 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES/MARKETPLACE PARTNERS July 14, 2004 Page 3 5) The design and improvements at the comer of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Lme Road shall comply with the Day Creek Boulevard SceniGRecreation Comdor Master Plan 6) The design and improvements along Day Creek Boulevard shall comply with the Day Creek Boulevard SceniGRecreation Comdor Master Plan 7) The urnform hardscape and pedestnan amenities shall be subtect to City Planner revew and approval 8) Buildings G and H, and Bwldmgs E and F shall have similar details, architectural elements, and roof matenal, subtect to City Planner revew and approval 9) Separate Development Revew application for City Planner approval is required for Budding A, pnor to plan check, because no elevations were included m this application _ 10) The Uniform Sign Program shall incorporate a historic nature m appearance subtect to Design Review Committee review and approval pnor to issuance of bwldmg pemtds 11) Walls and fence along Base Line Road and east property boundary shall follow the design and matenal of the Fdippi Winery, except that no chain link fencing is allowed Detail plans shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval 12) Provide bus shelter for Base Lme Road outside public right-of-way The location and design of bus shelter shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval 13) Provide pedestnan connection from public sidewalk off Budding F to on- site subject to City Planner review and approval 14) Provide pedestnan connection from driveway entry to Budding G subted to City Planner revew and approval 15) The plaza design at the comer of Day Creek Boulevard and Madrigal Street shall be subfect to City Planner review and approval 16) The list of uses allowed and prohibited for the commercial center shall follow the list described in "Proposed Methods to Assure High Standards of Operation and Quality Tenants" revised April 30, 2004, and attachments, which is attached as Exhibit "A " The City shall initiate an amendment to the ~ctona Arbors Master Plan to confirm the list of permitted and conditionally permitted uses approved with this Conditional Use Permit This amendment process may include revisions to the list of uses as the City, applicant, and Fdippi Winery representatives continue to discuss refinement to the list of uses ~, ~ G ~5 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-86 DRC2003-00504 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES/MARKETPLACE PARTNERS July 14, 2004 Page 4 17) Within 30 days of approval of the amendment to the Victona Arbors Master Plan, a revised copy of the Master Plan incorporating the changes to the list of uses shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval Upon acceptance by the City Planner, a total of 15 unbound hard copies and one executable copy on a CD Rom shall be submitted to the City The cost of revising the Master Plan shall be borne by the applicant and/or developer 18) The uses allowed to occupy Buildings A and B shall follow the list of favored uses as descnbed in "Proposed Methods to Assure High Standards of Operation and Quality Tenants" revised Apnl 30, 2004 19) The property owner shall adhere to the "Proposed Methods to Assure High Standards of Operation and Quality Tenants" revised Apnl 30, 2004, for the life of the protect 20) Landscaping theme and species especially along the east property boundary shall t>e compatible to the adtacent vineyards 21) Noise attenuation shall be provided in accordance with the Noise Study prepared by RK Engineenng Group, Inc dated October 2003, including the following 8-foot sound wall for the trash compactor • 6-foot sound wall along the east property boundary from the south end of Henry's Market to the setback and turn west along Madngal Street frontage at parking setback line 22) A low retaining wall shall be provided at the bottom of the slope for the south property line along Madngal Street frontage to prevent sod erosion that washes off the parkway Enaineennp Division 1) All pertinent conditions of Tentative Tract 15974, Planning Commission Resolution No 01-25 and Gty of Rancho Cucamonga CFD 2001-01 shall apply 2) Base Line Road frontage improvements shall be installed in accordance wdh the City "Mator Divided Artenal" standards as regwred, inGuding, but not limited to, curb, gutter, sidewalk, dnveway approaches, streetlights, street trees, signing, and stnping 3) The westbound left turn lane on Base Line Road at the easterly dnveway wdl not be permitted Provide a full median at that location 4) Provide a separate nght turn lane for all dnveways on Base Line Road ~, ~ ~ ~(o PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-86 DRC2003-00504 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES/MARKETPLACE PARTNERS . July 14, 2004 Page 5 5) The lane configuration on Base Line Road shall be 12 feet from the centerline to the south side of the median island, then 12 feet, 11 feet, and 11 feet thru lanes, 5-foot bike lane, and 11-foot bus bay/nght tum lane 6) Relocate or modify traffic signal equipment at Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard as regwred 7) Day Creek Boulevard frontage improvements shall be installed in accordance with the City "Mator Divided Artenal" standards as regwred, including, but not limited to, curb, gutter, sidewalk, dnveway approach, streetlights, street trees, signing, and stnpmg 8) The lane configuration on Day Creek Boulevard shall be 10-foot and 11-foot left tum lanes, then 11-foot, 11-foot, and 11-foot thru lanes, 5-foot bike lane, and an 11-foot nght tum lane 9) Provide a separate nght tum lane for the dnveway on Day Creek Boulevard 10) All dnve approaches shall be constructed per City Standard No 101 Type "C " 11) No pavers will be permitted within the public street nght-of-way at any dnveway entrance 12) A traffic signal at Day Creek Boulevard and Madngal Dnve shall be installed and operational pnorto occupancy of any bwldings 13) Madngal Dnve frontage improvements shall be installed in accordance with the City "Collector" standards as required, inGuding, but not hm~ted to, curb, gutter, sidewalk, dnveway approach, streetlights, street trees, signing, and stnpmg 14) The Traffic Impact Analysis fair share traffic mitigation for improvements outside the City limits shall be proportionally paid pnorto each final map recordation Fair share amount for DRC2003-00504 is $18,141 33 15) A Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) is required and shall meet the approval of the City Engineer pnorto Grading Perrnt approval 16) Pnor to the issuance of bwlding permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50 percent of all wastes generated dunng construction and demolition are diverted from landfills and appropnate documentation is provided to the City Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineenng Division when the first bwlding permit application is submitted to Building and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineenng Division ~i ~i PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-86 DRC2003-00504 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES/MARKETPLACE PARTNERS July 14, 2004 Page 6 within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition protect 17) Provide for a reGprocal dnveway access for the property immediately to the east (winery property) 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF JULY 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY ATTEST Rich Macias, Chairman Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of July 2004, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS • ~J r1 L.J ~,~, G~8 ;Ra+, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003-00504 SUBJECT: A SPECIALTY COMMERCIAL CENTER TOTALING 79,661 SQUARE FEET APPLICANT: MARKETPLACE PARTNERS/CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES LOCATION. SEC BASE LINE ROAD AND DAY CREEK BOULEVARD ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACTTHE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: ~. General Requirements 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relingwsh such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 04-86, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect B. Time Limits Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or DevelopmenUDesign Review approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, the Victoria Arbors Master Plan, and the Victoria Community Plan SC-1-04 1 Comolefion Date _/-/. / / / / / / i \planning\final\pingcomm\dre2003-00504cond 7-14doc doc ~ ~ r ~~ Protect No DRC2003-00504 Completion Date 2 Prior to any use of the pro/ect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions _/_/_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner . 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and _/_/_ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and bwlding elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/_/_ submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bwlding permits 5 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/_/_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all _/_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of bwlding permit issuance 7 A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved _/_/_ by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of bwlding permits Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties 8 Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards The final design, locations, and _/_/_ the number of trash receptacles shall be sub/ect to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 9 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be _/_/ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete ~ or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For single- family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 10 All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, _/_/_ including proper illumination 11 The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CCSRs) and Articles of Incorporation of the _/_/_ Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions and the City Attorney They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of bwlding permits, whichever occurs first A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer The Homeowners' Assoaation shall submit to the Planning Division a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes 12 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property _/_/_ homeowners' assoaation, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape owner , maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of budding permits 13 The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all _I_/_ lots for City Planner and City Engineer approval, including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing 14 Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock Other stone veneers maybe manufactured _/_/_ products i SC•1-04 i llanning\final\pingcomm\dre2003-00504cond 7-14doc doc E, ~,~ ~ Protect No DRC2003-00504 Comole6on Dale Shopping Centers 1 A uniform hardscape and street furniture design including seating benches, trash receptacles, free-standing potted plants, bike racks, light bollards, etc ,shall be utilized and be compatible with the architectural style Detailed designs shall be submitted for Planning Division review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 2 Provide for the following design features in each trash enclosure, to the satisfaction of the Crty Planner a Architecturally integrated into the design of (the shopping center/the project) b Separate pedestrian access that does not regwre the opening of the main doors and to include self-closing pedestrian doors c Large enough to accommodate two trash bins d Roll-up doors e Trash bins with counter-weighted lids f Architecturally treated overhead shade trellis g Chain link screen on top to prevent trash from blowing out of the enclosure and designed to be hidden from view 3 Trash collection shall occur between the hours of 7 a m and 8 p m only 4 Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours 5 The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at ail times and in no event shall trash and debris remain far more than 24 hours 6 Signs shall be conveniently posted for "no overnight parking" and for "employee parking only " 7 All operations and businesses shall be conducted to comply with the following standards which shall be incorporated into the lease agreements for all tenants a Noise Level -All commercial activities shall not create any noise that would exceed an exterior noise level of 60 dB during the hours of 10 p m until 7 a m and 65 dB during the hours of l a m until 10 p m b Loading and Unloading - No person shall cause the loading, unloading, opening, closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10 p m and 7 a m unless otherwise specked herein, in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to a residential area 8 Textured pavement shall be provided across circulation aisle, pedestrian walkway, and plaza They shall be of brick/tile pavers, exposed aggregate, integral color concrete, or any combination thereof Full samples shall be submitted for Ctty Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 9 All future building pads shall be seeded and irrigated for erosion control Detailed plans shall be included in the landscape and irrigation plans to be submitted for Planning Dtwsion approval prior to the issuance of building permits 10 The lighting fixture design shall compliment the architectural program It shall include the plaza area lighting fixtures, budding fighting fixtures (exterior), and parking lot fighting fixtures SC-1-04 ~' r ~ ~/ 3 T i \planning\final\pingcomm\dre2003-00504cond 7-14doc doc -/-/ -/-/- / / / / / / I / / / I / / / / / / / -/-/- / / I I / / / / / / / / Protect No DRC2003-00504 Comolehon Date 11 Any outdoor vending machines shall be recessed into the building faces and shall not extend into the pedestrian walkways The design details shall be reviewed and approved bythe City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits E. Building Design All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or protections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adtacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Division Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner Details shall be included in bwldmg plans For commercial and industrial pro/acts, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main bwldmg colors Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1 All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long W hen a side of any parking space abuts a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide 2 All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall contain a 12-inch walk ad/scent to the parking stall (including curb) 3 Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses 4 All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards G. Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bwldmg permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 A minimum of 20% of trees planted within industrial protects, and a minimum of 30% within commercial and office protects, shall be specimen size trees - 24-inch box or larger 3 Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls 4 Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adtacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of bwldmg 5 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting requued by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 6 All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in SC-1-04 i \planning\final\pingcommldre2003-00504cond 7-14doc doc 4 ~/~~"~ / /_ -- / / / / / / / / / / _/_/~ / / / / I / / / / / / / Protect No DRC2003-00504 Comole6on Date staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting required by this section shall . include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 7 For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas wtthin the public right-of-way All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage 8 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Cary Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Division 9 Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this pro/ect area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 10 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located to public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division 11 Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19 16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code H. Signs 1 The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require • -separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any signs 2 A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits Other Agencies The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be sub/ect to Ctty Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of budding permts APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEWIS) J. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size 5~-1-Da ~, ~ ~ 83 5 i \planning\final\pingcomm\dre2003-00604cond 7-14doc doc / / / / / I / I -/-/- / / -/-/- / / / / Protect No DRC2003-00504 Completion Date of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single Itne diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste d • air diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating an conditioning, and g Planning Division Protect Number (i e , SUBTT #, SUBTPM#, DRC #) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report -/-/- Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to -/-/- the City pnor to permit issuance 4 Separate permits are regwred for fencing andlor walls -/-/- 5 Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the -/-I- Building and Safety Division 6 Developers wishing to participate to the Community Energy Effiaency Program (CEEP) can -/-/- contact the Building and Safety Division staff for information and submittal requirements K. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be -/-/- marked with the protect file number (i e , DRC2001-00001) The applicant shall complywith the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts • 2 Prior to issuance of bwlding permits for a new commercial or industrial development protect or -/-/- matoraddition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include but are not limited to Clty Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Dvision pnor to permits Issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tracUparcel map -I-/- recordahon and pnor to issuance of budding permts 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday -/-I- through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays 5 Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Division's public -/-/- counter) L. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances -I-/- considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations -/-/- 3 Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC -/-/- Section 1505 4 Exterior walls shall be constructed of the regwred fire rating in accordance with CBC Table 5-A -/-l~ SC-1-04 6 ~/~i ~ S~ i \planning\final\pingcomm\dre2003-00504cond 7-14doc doc Project No DRC2003-00504 5 Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC Table 5-A 6 Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed M. Grading 1 Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with Califomia Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Bulding and Safety Offiaal prior to the issuance of building permits 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction protects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer - APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: L~ SC-1-04 i \planninglfinal\pingcomm\dre2003-00504cond 7-14doc doc Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Recprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CCBRs or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of building permits, where no map is involved 2 Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring tomt maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map 3 Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map 4 All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall bequit-claimed or delineated on the final map 5 Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City 6 Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs 7 ~~ ~, ~ g5 Comolehon Date / / -/-/- / / / / / / / / / / / / -/-/ / / / / / / / / Protect No DRC2003-00504 Comolehon Date O. Street Improvements Pursuant to CIty Council Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which Is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, In addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all Improvements requlred by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the Clty Council, except that in developments containing more than one bullding or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of Improvements as requlred by condltlons of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all Improvements requlred by these condltlons of approval of development A minimum of 26-foot wide pavement, within a 40-foot wide dedicated right-of-way shall be constructed for all half-section streets - Construct the following perimeter street improvements Including, but not limited to Sheet Name Curb & Gutter AC Pvmt Side- walk Dnve Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island &ke Trail X Base Llne Road X X X X X X X X Day Creek Boulevard X X X X X X X X Madrigal Street X X X X X X Improvement Plans and Construction a Street Improvement plans, Including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered CIVII Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the Clty Engineer and the Clty Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street Improvements, prior to final map approval or the Issuance of bullding permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Clty Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be Installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along mator or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer Existrng City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the CIty Engineer / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / LJ SC-1-04 ~/ ~ ~ ~~ 8 i \planning\final\pingcommldre2003-00504cond 7-14doc doc Project No DRC2003-00504 Comolehon Date • SC-1 A4 i \planning\final\pingcomm\dre2003-00504cond 7-14doc doc g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check 5 Provide a minimum of 3-inch conduit for future fiber optic use on all streets with connection through the parkway to each lot or parcel (fiber-to-the curb, FTTC) The size, placement, and location of the conduit shall be shown on the Street Improvement Plans and subtect to City Engineer review and approval prior to issuance of building permits or final map approval, whichever comes first 6 Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the Cjty's street tree program 7 Install street trees per City street tree design gwdelines and standards as follows The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend" Where public landscape plans are requued, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans The City Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional information, contact the Project Engineer Mm Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size Qty Day Creek 4' 25' O C 15' Min B T H fill Boulevard staggered or match est in Street Tree Washingtonia robusta Mexican Fan rows on alternate heights Min, of 5' away from Palm sides of walk streetlight Street Tree Pyrus callerana NCN 4' 25' O C 15 Gal 'Anstocrat' staggered matched rows on standards altemate sides of walk Informal Base Lme Road P A 8' or Magnolia grandiflora NCN 8 30' O C 15 Gal greater 'Samuel Sommer' Formal P A Less Magnolia grandiflora NCN 3' 20' O C 15 Gal than 8' 'St Mary' Formal Provide SELECT APPROPRIATE TREE FROM THE APPROVED STREET TREE LIST Street Name FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST EACH STREET AS A SEPARATE LINE ITEM WITHIN THIS LEGEND STREET TREES LISTED BELOW ARE FOR ON-SITE PLAN REFERENCE ONLY -NOT TO APPEAR ON STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS Day Creek Brachychiton Bottle Tree 5' 25' O C 15 Gal Boulevard populneus Background where room Base Lme Road W/O Haven Avenue Liquidambar American Sweet 8' 25' O C 15 Gal Background styraaflua Gum Tree g E,~ G g~ / / / / / / / I Prgect No DRC2003-00504 Comolehon Date Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutnent deficiencies may regwre backfdl sod amendments, as determined by the City inspector 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Division 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only 8 Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with _/_/_ adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all pro/ect intersections, including driveways Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required P. Public Maintenance Areas 1 Public landscape areas are required to incorporate substantial areas of mortared cobble or other _I_/_ acceptable non-irrigated surfaces 2 A signed consent and waiver form to join andlor form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting _/_/_ Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of bwlding permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer 3_ All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the _/_/_ developer until accepted by the City 4 Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective _/_/_ Beautification Master Plan Victoria Arbors Master Plan Q. Drainage and Flood Control 1 A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map _/_/_ approval or the issuance of bwlding permits, whichever occurs first All drainage faalities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer 2 Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the _/_/_ property from adjacent areas 3 Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured _/_/_ from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk R. Utilities 1 Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, _/_/_ electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as regwred 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary _/_/_ 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the regwrements of the _/_I_ Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects SC-1-04 i \planning\final\pingcomm\dre2003-00504cond 7-14doc doc ,o ~,~GB~ Protect No DRC2003-00504 Comolenon Date 4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other Interested agenaes involved Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any regwrements that may be received from them S. General Requirements and Approvals An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first, for Base Line Road Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance rf no map is involved - Prior to the issuance of bulding permtts, a Drversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable If at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Division when the first building permit application is submitted to Building and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Division within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: T. Security Lighting 1 All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell 2 All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buldings, with duect lighting to be provided by all entryways Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development U. Windows Storefront windows shall be visible to passing pedestrians and traffic Security glazing Is recommended on storefront windows to resist window smashes and impede entry to burglars V Building Numbering All developments shall submit an 8'/z" x 11"sheet with the numbering pattern of all multi-tenant developments to the Police Department W. Alarm Systems Install a burglar alarm system and a panic alarm if needed Instructing management and employees on the operation of the alarm system will reduce the amount of false alarms and in turn save dollars and lives Alarm companies shall be provided with the 24-hour Sheriffs dispatch number (909) 941-1488 SC-1-04 / / / / / I / / / / -/-/- / / / / / / / / / / i \planning\final\pingcomm\dre2003-00504cond 7-14doc doc Protect No DRC2003-00504 Completion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACTTHE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED n ~~ f,...,J SC-~-oa ~z ~i ~~ C] ~d i \planning\final\pingcomm\dre2003-00504cond 7-14doc doc RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT STANDARD CONDITIONS Charles Joseph and PROJECT/FILE #. DRC2003-00504 APPLICANT NAME: Associates Day Creek Market PROJECT NAME: Place OCCUPANCY CLASS M and A SEC of baseline Rd and LOCATION: Daycreek Blvd FLOOR AREA (S): 6,100-27,000 DATE: 10/09/03 TYPE CONSTRUCTION Assumed V-n PLAN TYPE: Comerciai FD REVIEW BY: Moises Eskenazi, PLANNER• Alan Warren Sr Plans Examiner ALL OF THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, (909) 477-2713, TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING: RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT- STANDARD CONDITIONS & REQUIREMENTS - General, Procedural, Technical, or Operational Information that shall be Included, Corrected, or Completed as noted below. The following is applicable to the above project. FSC-1 General Requirements for Public and Private Water Supply General Gwdance for Fire Hydrants The following provides general guidance for the spacing and location of fire hydrants, Remember these are the maximum permitted distances between fire hydrants a The maximum distance between fire hydrants in commeraal/industrial protects is 300-feet No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs the distance shall not exceed 100-feet b The maximum distance between fire hydrants in multi-family residential is 400-feet No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 200-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de- sacs the distance shall not exceed 150-feet c The maximum distance between fire hydrants in single-family residential protects is 500-feet No portion of the exterior wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 250-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs the distance shall not exceed 200 ft d For single-family residential protects in the designated Hazardous Fire Area the maximum distance between fire hydrants is 400-feet No portion of the exterior wall facng the addressed street shall be more than 200-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs the distance shall not exceed 150 ft e Fire hydrants are to be located 1 At the entrance(s) to a protect from the existing public roadways This includes subdivisions and industrial parks 2 At intersections 3 On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible 4 As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs 5 The location of fire hydrants is based upon the operational needs of the Fire District to control a fire ~, f, ~ 9/ 6 Fire hydrants shall be located a rrunimum of forty (40) feet from any building Contact the Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 2 Minimum Frre Flow The requred fire flow for this protect is 4500 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch This regwrement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as amended Verification has been received 3 Hydrants Used to Supply Fire Flow Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radds of the proposed protect may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fue District review and approval Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide requred fire flow Contact the Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 4 Show Existing Fire Hydrants and Mains. Existing fire hydrants and mains within 600-feet of the protect shall be shown on the water plan submitted for review and approval Include main size FSC-2 Private (OnSrte) Water andlor Frre Sprinkler Underground Plans for Fire Protection 1 Exceeds Allowable Distance When any portion of a faality or bwlding is located more than 150-feet from a fire hydrant located on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided The distance is measured as vehicular path of travel on access roadways, not line of sight Contact the Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 2 Number of Fire Hydrants Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow or fraction thereof, subject to standard spacing and distribution requirements Contact the Fire Construction Services (909)477-2713 3 Fire Sprinkler Underground. Prior to the issuance of a fire sprinkler system permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, specfications, and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground to the Fire Safety Division for approval Contact the Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 FSC-4 Fire District Site Access-Technical Comments 1 Access Roadways Defined• Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets, and highways, as well as private roads, streets, drive aisles and designated fire lanes 2 Location of Access All portions of the structure or faality or any portion of the exterior wall of the first story shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehice access, measured by an unobstructed approved route around the exterior of the bulding Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates, and fences are an obstruction 3 Private Roadways and Fire Lanes• The minimum specifications (per the approved alternative method) for private fire district access roadways are a The minimum unobstructed width is 26 feet b The inside tum radius shall be 20 feet c The outside tum radius shall be not less than 46-feet d The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet e The minimum vertical clearance ~s 14 feet, 6 inches f At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet g The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9 degrees or 20 percent - h The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12% i Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW) ~, ~, C 9a 4 Access Walkways Approved access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all required bwlding exterior openings 5 Vegetation: Trees and shrubs planted in any median shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14-feet, 6- inches from the ground up, so as not to impede fire vehicles Contact the Fire Construction Services (909)477-2713 6 Frre Lane Identification All regwred fire lanes shall be identified by red curbing and signage A drawing of the proposed signage that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be submitted to and approved Contact the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distract at (909) 477-2770 for a copy of the FD Fire Lanes standard Note. Carefully review the items below There may be significant impact on the proposed protect. Italicized text indicates a Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distract amendment. 1 General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the tudgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property 2 Operate a place of public assembly 3 Candles and open flame in public assembly FSC-12 Plan Submittal Required Notice Requred plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 200012001 Bwlding, Fire, Mechanical, and Plumbing Codes, 1999 Electrical Code, Health and Safety Code, Public Resources Code, and RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD39, Guidelines and Standards - NOTE In addition to the fees due at this time please note that separate plan check fees for tenant improvements, fire protection systems and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed at hme of submittal of plans FSC-14 Alternate Materials and Methods The Fire Safety Division will review requests for alternate materials and methods within the scope of our authority The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents Contact the Fire Safety Division at (909) 477-2770 for assistance PRIOR TO (PARCEL) MAP RECORDATION- For Each Development Phase 1 Prior to the recordation of the applicable subdivision map, the Fire District in consultation with the City Engineer shall approve the locations of Traffic Signal Preemption Devices The subdivider shall enter into an agreement with the City for the installation of traffic signal preemption equipment for the surrounding controlled intersections 2 Reciprocal Access Agreement: The plans as submitted indicate that a required point of Fire District access a Reqwres passage on property not under the control of the applicant, or b Does not access a public way, or c Crosses a property line Please provide a permanent access agreement granting irrevocable use of the adtacent property for use by the Fire District to gain access to the subtect property The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, bwlding, or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan required below The agreement shall be recorded with the County of San Bernardino, Recorders Office The agreement shall be approved by the Fire Safety Division prior to recordation ~,~;~j93 To assist the Fire Safety Division in reviewing the agreement the following shall be included in the submittal a Title Report A current title report, policy of title insurance, or other equivalent documentation proving ownership of all property included in the agreement b Legal Description A legal description of all property subject to the agreement c Assessor's Parcel Numbers The assessor's parcel numbers of each parcel subject to the agreement d Site Plan The access roadway shall comply with the regwrements of Private Roadways and Fire Lanes listed above A scaled site plan showing the path of the Fire District access, the width, turn radu, load-bearing capacity of roadway surface, etc shall be provided Contact the Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 3 Reciprocal Water Covenant and Agreement The plans as submitted indicate that a required private fire mains or appurtenances thereto a Pass through or are located on property not under the control of the applicant, or b Crosses a property line Please provide a permanent maintenance and service agreement between the owner's granting a non- exclusive easement for the purpose of accessing and maintaining the private water mains, fire hydrants, and built-in fire protection systems The agreement shall meet the form and content approved by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District, Fire Safety Division The agreement shall be recorded with the County of San Bernardino, Recorders Office The agreement shall be approved by the Fire Safety Division prior to recordation Contact the Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS- Complete the following: 1 PnvatelOn-site Fire Hydrants Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, speaflcations, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District standards Contac the Fire Safety Division for a copy of "Fire District Notes for Underground and Water Plans "Contact the Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 2 Private Frre HydrantslOn-site Installation All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable prior to delivering any combustible building materials on-site (i a ,lumber, roofing materials, etc) A representative of Fire Construction Services shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The builder/developer shall submit final test and inspection report to the Fire Safety Division Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 3 Public Fire Hydrants: Prior to issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and the Water District On the plan show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radws of the project Contact the Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 4 Public Installation All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable prior to delivering any combustible bwld~ng materials on-site (i a ,lumber, roofing materials, etc) Water District personnel shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The bwlderldeveloper shall submit a copy of the Water District inspection report to the Fire Safety Division Contact Water District to schedule testing PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION- Complete the following: 1 Hydrant Markers. All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installahon of Reflective Hydrant Markers " On private property these markers are to be maintained in good condition by the property owner Contact Building and SafetylFire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 4 ~,~G9~ 2 Private Fire Hydrants-Final Acceptance For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional test of the on-site fire hydrants shall be conducted by the builder/developer in the presence of the Water District or Fire Construction Services, as appropriate The builder/developer shall submit the final test report to the Fire Safety Division 3 Fire Sprinkler System- Plans and Permit Plans for the required automatic fire sprinkler system shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services far review and approval No work is allowed without a Fire Construction Services permit Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 4 Fire Sprinkler System-Final Inspection Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services Contact Budding and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 5 Sprinkler Monitoring The fire sprinkler system monitoring system shall be installed, tested, and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system Monitoring is required with 20 sprinklers in Group 1 Occupancies, or 100 or more sprinklers m all other Occupancies Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 6 Fire Suppression System• Plans and speafications for the fire suppression system for the protection of commeraal-type cooking egwpment or other special hazard shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for review and approval No work is allowed without a Fire Construction Services permit Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 7 Fire Alarm System• Plans for the fire alarm system shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for review and approval No work is allowed without a Fire District permit Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 8 Access ControlfTraffic Calming Device Perinit A Fire District permit is requred to install any access control device, traffic-calming device, or gate on any access roadway Applicable CC&R's, or other approved documents, shall contain provisions that prohibit obstructions such as traffic-calming devices (speed bumps, humps, etc ), control gates, bollards, or other mod cations m fire lanes or access roadways without prior written approval of the Fire District, Fire Safety Division 9 Knox Rapid Entry System• A Knox rapid entry key vault shall be installed prior to final inspection Proof of purchase shall be submitted prior to final building plan approval Contact the Fire Safety Division for speck details and ordering information Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 for inspection 10 Construction Access: Fire District access, a minimum 26-feet in width and 14-feet, 6-inches minimum clear height shall be provided These minimum clearances shall be maintained free and clear of any obstructions at all times, in accordance with Fire District Standards Contact the Fire Safety Dvision (909) 477-2770 11 Phased Construction Each phase shall be provided with approved Fire District access roadways Dead-end roadways shall not exceed the maximum permitted by the Fire Code or Fire District standards 12 Fire Lanes. Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire lanes shall be installed in accordance with the approved fire lane plan The CC&R's or other approved documents shall contain an approved fire lane map and provisions that prohibit parking m the fire lanes The method of enforcement shall be documented The CCBR's shall also identify who is responsible for not less than annual inspection and maintenance of all regwred fire lanes Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 13 Address- Other Than Single-family New buildings other than single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness When the building setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street an additional non-illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 ~,~G95 14 Fire Suppression Systems- Final Inspection and Testing Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire suppression system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Service Construction Services Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 15 Fire Alarm System- Final Inspection and Testmg Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm (and detection) system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 16 High-pile Combusbble Storage-Peramt The applicant is required to obtain a Fire Distract Permit for Storage of High-pile Combustible material Contact the Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770 17 High-pile Combustible Storage- Plans The applicant shall submit plans for the storage arrangement to Fire Construction Services The applicant shall submit detailed plans and a Commodity Analysis report to Fire Construction Services for approval If the occupancy classification for the building is designated as Group S, Division 2, commodities stored shall be limited to light hazard classficehon only Contact Bwlding and SafetylFire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 18 Hazardous or Flammable Liquid Storage Tanks- County Review The plans for flammable or hazardous hgwd storage tanks shall be reviewed and approved by the San Bernardino County Fire I Department, Hazardous Matenals Division/Tank Program Contact County Fire Dept at (909) 386- I 8407 19 Business Emergency/Contingency Plan. The applicant shall submit a Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for emergency release or threatened release of hazardous materials and wastes or provide a letter of exemption Contact the County Fire Department, Hazardous MaterialslEmergency Response and Enforcement Division at (909) 386-8412 20 Submittal to the Fire Distnct• Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy a copy of the County Fire Department approved Business EmergencylContingency Plan -New Business (Hazardous Materials Release Response Plans and Inventory) shall be submitted to the Fire District In some cases additional information that is not in the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan may be - regwred in order to support local fire prevention and emergency response programs Contact Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770 21 Required County Permits The applicant shall be required to apply for one or more of the following - Hazardous Materials Handler Permit, a Hazardous Waste Generator Permlt, an Aboveground Storage Tank Permit, and/or an Underground Storage Tank Permit Contact the County Fire Department, Hazardous Matenals Division/Field Services Section at (909) 384-8407 22 Rrsk Management Plan The applicant must demonstrate that the faality has met or is meeting all Risk Management Plan (RMP) regwrements if regulated substances are to be handled at the facility Contact the County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials/Emergency Response and Enforcement Division at (909) 387-8412 - 23 Fire Distract Confidential Business Occupancy Information: The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" Fonn and submit to the Fire Safety Division This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the sub/ect building or property Contact Frre Safety Division (909) 477-2770 Fire Distract Forms and Letters Note If these conditions are part of the final Standard Conditions issued by the Planning Dwision referenced Fire Distract forms and letters are not included Contact the Fire Safety Dvision for copies of forms or letters The forms and letter are also found m previously issued Fire Distract comments Fire District Review Letter (P&E)- Template SL 10/31/02 Revision ~~ E,F,G9~ . RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT OWNER'S STATEMENT -TENANT INTENDED USE LETTER Business Name Building Address Occupancy Classification Type of Construction Total Floor Area (sq ft) Automatic Fire Spnnklers~ Yes ( ) No ( ) Based upon available ceiling height, occupancy classification, unidentified tenant or use, and/or other factors the Rancho Cucamonga Fue Protection Distnct, Fire Safety Division, requues that the following mfonnation be provided to allow plans to be reviewed This building will not be used for high-piled combustible storage, as defined m Article 2, Section 209 of the Uniform Fire Code Storage heights will not exceed 12-feet in closely packed piles or combustible matenals on pallets, m racks or on shelves This includes storage of rubber tires, Group A plastics, flammable hgwds, idle pallets, etc ,where the top of storage is greater than 6-feet This building will be used for high-piled combustible storage and will comply with the requirements of Article 81 of the Umfonn Fire Code This budding is a "speculative" building without a tenant at this time The tenant will be notified by the building owner/management of the requirements for high-piled combustible storage and the storage and use of flammable liquids and/or hazardous matenals pnor to occupancy The Fire Distnct SHALL be notified by the building owner/management of the intended use pnor to occupancy This bwldmg is a "speculative" building without a tenant at this time The building meets the requirements of Article 81, Unifonn Fire Code for access roadways, access doors, and has a vent ratio of_ 1 100 _1 75 1 50 1 40 _ 1 30 (select correct ratio) The future tenant shall contact the Fire Distnct for proper commodity classification, spnnkler protection, standpipe, and permits pnor to occupancy Owner's Signature Owner's Name (Typed or Pnnted) i Date Telephone ~,~ ~9~ Revised April 30, 2004 • PROPOSED METHODS TO ASSURE HIGH STANDARDS OF OPERATION AND QUALITY OF TENANTS Project at SEC of Day Creek Blvd. and Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA (Revisions and Additions are Italicized) BACKGROUND At their meeting of March 2, 2004, the Task Force asked that staff and the applicant consider means to assure that the development and long-term operation of the proposed project will meet and comply with the spent, intent and regulations of the Victoria Arbors Master Plan It was agreed that the success of this project wound depend on the speafic uses that locate in this center and the daily management of those uses The goal is that any new prolect will work with and build upon the historic value and use of the winery I. HIGH OPERATING STANDARDS: The prolect applicant shall enforce and abide by the following rules and regulations in the operation of the commercial prolect 1 Exterior Signs and Advertising (a) A Sign Program and a Street and Plaza Furniture Master Plan shall be reviewed prior and approved concurrently with the Conditional Use Permit for the Center All tenants shall be required to use only approved furnishings and signs (b) The Sign Program shall require and depict signs that have a historic nature in appearance (e g. smaller tenant budding signs with a sandblasted wood appearance with exterior illumination using gooseneck lights) No sign shall be allowed that will detract from the historic context of this prolect and the adjacent winery (c) Within 30 days of cessation of business by a prolect occupant all signs shall be removed and the exterior building or monument sign surface patched and painted to match the finish and color of the adjacent surface (d) Exposed raceways are not permitted Exposed junction boxes, lamps, tubing or neon crossovers of any type are not permitted (e) There shall be no signs that are flashing, moving or audible . EXHIBIT "A" ~ ~l ~~ G 90 (f) No sign shall protect above or below the sign area designated in the Sign Program (g) Signs on or affixed to trucks, automobiles, trailers or other vehicles which advertise, identify or provide direction to a use or activity not related to its lawful acfiwty are prohibited (h) Light bulb strings are prohibited (Q "Sandwich boards", "billboards", or "A-frame signs" are prohibited ~) Banners shall comply with the City Sign Ordinance in all respects and shall be professional and tasteful 2 Interior Signs and Advertising (a) Painting of signs or images on the interior or exterior of windows is prohibited (b) Neon signs placed against window areas are prohibited (c) Temporary mtenor window signs shall be limited as specified in the City • Sign Ordinance, and shall be professionally and tastefully prepared (d) Signs that are flashing, moving or audible are prohibited (e) Permanent signs affixed to windows shall be attached to the mtenor side only and shall comply with the City-approved Sign Program and the City Sign Ordinance (f) The prohibition and limitation of signs and other rtems ~n window areas shall extend for a distance of five (5) feet behind window areas. 3 Sidewalks Plaza Areas Parkinp Lot and Landscaped Areas (a) Outdoor sales m sidewalk and plaza areas are prohibited This prohibition shall not apply to kiosks, the anchor tenant of the protect or chartable organizations such as the Girl Scouts (b) Parking lot sales are prohibited except for seasonal sales (e g. Christmas trees) by the anchor tenant which are permitted under such tenant's lease agreement and are limited as specified in the City Zoning Ordinance (c) Occupants of the protect shall not place any items such as furniture or trash receptacles in sidewalk or plaza areas unless such items are approved by the property owner and are consistent with aprotect-wide exterior furniture program ~,F,G99 Page 2 4 Service and Delivery Areas and Trash Areas (a) No exterior storage of boxes, cartons, pallets or similar items is permitted (b) All trash shall be placed in trash bins which are to be kept in designated trash enclosures (c) All deliveries shall be limited to appropriate delivery areas specified on the City-approved site plan (d) Deliveries shall be limited to the hours of 7 am to 10 pm 5 Enforcement of Operating Standards Relating to Signs and Furnishings The developer shall agree to aggressively enforce all site furnishing regulations and signs for the businesses in their center A violation provision shall be a part of every signed lease for any business occupying space on or within the center It shall be specifically noted in the lease agreement that violations of these provisions (continuing after a reasonable cure period for the tenant and its lender) shall be grounds for terminating the lease Further, the developer will not rely on the City to process enforcement of violators If enforcement does not occur after a reasonable cure period (including time to allow the developer to secure legal access to the tenant's premises), the . developer, not the business, shall be subiect to a $100 fine, per day, per violation Repeated violations of these provisions without good faith attempts to cure such violations would be grounds for revocation of the center's Conditional Use Permit II. QUALITY TENANTS 1 Overall Leasing and Marketing Philosophy The goal of the protect applicant shall be to attract a higher level of merchant who is appreciative of the historic nature of the Filippi Winery and the surrounding area Though many of the protect tenants are expected to offer goods and services which would be categorized as "neighborhood serving", priority will be given to attracting tenants whose businesses are winery related or complementary to the winery-theme of the protect 2 Placement of Tenants within the Shopping Center In leasing space within the center, the protect applicant will exercise diligence in concentrating "neighborhood serving" uses in buildings other than Buildings A and B E, ~ ~ ~otJ Page 3 • The protect applicant will attempt to solicit uses of a speaalty and/or destination nature for Buildings A and B, which are the closest to the future connection with the Filippi Winery 3 Favored TyPes of Uses The project applicant is encouraged to locate the following uses within the Shopping Center, especially in Buildings A and 8 Sit down restaurant ' Florist or flower shop Jewelry store Book store Art shop Clothing store Coffee house Gift shop Greeting cards store Houseware boutique Camera store ~4 Prohibition of Certain Types of Uses d tt e Though all of the following uses are either permitted or conditionally permi under the Village Center Commercial section of the Victoria Arbors Master Plan, the p"rolect applicant is agreeable to omitting them from the Shopping Center • Drug store with drive thru Fast food restaurant with drive thru Automotve service stations Convenience markets Video arcades • Automotive coin-op washing Automotive automatic washing Automotive stations offering minor repair such as tune-ups, brakes, batteries, tires, mufflers Commercial recreation facilities bowling alley, theater, billiards and outdoor uses Thrift store • Self-service Laundromat Small family day care in the home, providing care for six (6) or less persons . Club, lodge, fraternity and sorority ~,~C~ID( Page 4 Convalescent center Large family day care in the home, providing care for 7-12 persons Outdoor recreation RV, mini-storage • Animal care faality Feed and tack stores • Janitorial services and supplies Mortuaries and cemeteries • Transportation factlities (train and bus, taxi depots) Private and public clubs and lodges, including YMCA, YWCA and similar youth groups Page 5 • RESOLUTION NO 04-87 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VARIANCE NO DRC2004-00522, A REQUEST TO REDUCE THE BUILDING AND LANDSCAPE SETBACK FROM 45 TO 20 FEET FOR BUILDINGS A AND H ALONG BASE LINE ROAD WITHIN A PROPOSED VILLAGE COMMERCIAL CENTER TOTALING 79,661 SQUARE FEET ON APPROXIMATELY 9 23 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MIXED USE DISTRICT OF THE VICTORIA ARBORS MASTER PLAN, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND DAY CREEK BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0227-161-39 A Rentals 1 Charles Joseph Associates for Marketplace Partners filed an application forthe issuance of Variance No DRC2004-00522, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subtect Variance request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 14th day of July 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date 3 All legal preregwsites poor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Rentals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on July 14, 2004, mGudmg written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to property located at the southeast comer of Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard with a street frontage of approximately 2,100 feet (along Day Creek Boulevard) and lot depth of 716 feet and which is presently improved undeveloped b The properties to the north are single-family homes, the properties to the south are single-family homes under construction, the property to the east is Joseph Fdippi Winery, and the property 4o the west is undeveloped c The site abuts a local historic landmark winery The winery budding is very Gose to the ultimate curb, and the strict application of the 45 feet budding setback for the protect site would result in practical difficulty in creating a master plan of streetscape and casual integration of the historic winery wdh the sde i d The protect site has extraordinary circumstance as it is abutting a local historic landmark winery, which does not apply generally to other properties in the same zone ~,~Glo3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-87 VAR DRC2004-00522 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES/MARKETPLACE PARTNERS JULY 14, 2004 Page 2 e The stnct application of the 45 feet setback will affect the design of the project, which in tum would affect the master plan of streetscape from the histonc winery f The granting of the reduction in setback does not constitute a grant of specal pnvilege or set a precedent for the City because there is no other properties in the Gty that abut a working histonc winery g The reduction of the setback will not affect public health, safety, or welfare 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng and upon the speafic findings of fads set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and conGudes as follows a That stnct or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulations would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent Huth the obtedives of the Development Code b That there are exceptional or extraordinary Groumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same distnct c That stnct or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would depnve the applicant of pnvileges entoyed by the owners of other properties in the same distnct d That the granting of the Vanance will not constitute a grant of special pnvilege inconsistent v~nth the limitations on other properties classified in the same distnct e That the granting of the Vanance will not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or matenally in~unous to properties or improvements in the vicinity 4 On July 7, 1999, the Gty Council cerbfied the Environmental Impact Report (State Cleannghouse No 98041137) as adequate and complete On December 20, 2000, the City Councal adopted Fads and Findings and a Statement of Ovemding Considerations for approving the Vidona Arbors Land Use entdlements On March 21, 2001, the City Council approved an addendum to the EIR (State Cleannghouse No 98041137) for approving the Victona Arbors Master Plan and the Tentatwe Parcel Map that created the parcel for the protect site Based on the Initial Study prepared by the Gtys Environmental Consultant, LSA, Associates, Inc , it was determined that the protect descnbed above is wnthin the scope of the certified EIR and addendum Further, it was determined that none of the elements set forth in Public Resources Code Section 21166 or Section 15162 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines (CEQA) exists and therefore no subsequent or supplemental Environmental Impact Report or Mitigated Negative Declaration is required to be prepared 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below Planning Division 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of ~~~~lOy~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-87 VAR DRC2004-00522 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES/MARKETPLACE PARTNERS JULY 14, 2004 Page 3 the issuance of such approval, or m the altematrve, to relmgwsh such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be regwred by a court to pay as a result of such action The Gty may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense m the defense of any such action but such partiapation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Vanance approval shall expire if bwlding permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF JULY 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Rich Maaas, Chairman ATTEST ' Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of July 2004, by the follov~nng vote-to-~nnt AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS ~, F G X05 .- ,= ~~.r- -~ C I T V O F ANCtIO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE: July 14, 2004 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Mike Smith, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16482 - CREATIVE BUILDING CONCEPTS - A request to subdivide 65 acre of land into 2 lots m the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located on the west side of Hellman Avenue at the terminus of Eiger Way - APN 0208-162-30 This action is categorically exempt per California Environmental Quality Act Gwdelines Section 15315 Minor Land Divisions ANALYSIS A Site Characteristics The protect site is located in the Low Residential (L) Distract on the west side of Hellman Avenue at the terminus of Eiger Way The 30,008 square foot property has a depth of about 273 feet (east-west) and a width of 110 feet (north-south) The lot is vacant Generally level with a slight slope to the south, the property is dominated by low grass with bushes along the north and south property Imes An existing drive approach at Hellman Avenue provides the only access to the site The different pace of development on the surrounding properties has led to lot sizes that vary within a range of 7,200 square feet (parcels to the west) to 35,000 square feet (parcels to the north and south) Ali properties surrounding the subtect site are zoned Low Residential (L) District and, except for the property to the east, are improved with single-family residences The property to the east is Cucamonga Middle School B Project Description The applicant proposes to subdivide the property into two parcels with the new lot Ime aligned north-south Parcel 1 will be about 134 feet deep and 110 feet wide with an overall area of 13,980 square feet Parcel 2 will be about 118 feet deep and 110 feet wide with an area of 13,025 square feet Anew driveway leading to an extension of Eiger Way will provide access to Parcel 1 while the existing drive approach on Hellman Avenue will be used to access Parcel 2 At this time, the applicant has not submitted any proposals for developing either lot Any future development will be regwred to comply with all City standards including, but not limited to, site development, design, grading, and construction requirements ITEM H PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 16482 -CREATIVE BUILDING CONCEPTS July 14, 2004 Page 2 C Applicable Regulat~ons The proposed parcels are subtect to the site development standards of the Low (L) Residential District Each lot will exceed the minimum regwrements established for this zone as outlined in Table 17 080 040-B of the Development Code (Exhibit "E"), including lot area, depth, width, and street frontage. D Technical and Grading Review The Grading Review Committee recommended approval at its meeting on June 1, 2004 The Technical Review Committee completed its analysis and accepted the protect, including a modified cut-de-sac design Because of existing physical limitations on the site, this design will be used at the terminus of Eiger Way The minimum width street frontage regwred for parcels in this district will be provided Also, this design will allow the owner to the north to access her property from Eiger Way (Exhibit "D") This design and other special conditions of approval have been incorporated into the Resolution E Environmental Review The protect is categorically exempt from the regwrements of the California Enwronmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15315, Class 15, of the State CEQA Gwdelines CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and all property owners within 300 feet of the protect site were notified Staff addressed questions from two property owners regarding access and traffic volume on Eiger Way, and the density of development permitted on the subtect property Staff satisfactorily answered their questions and they had no further concerns with the application RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tentative Parcel Map 16482 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions Resp/ectfu ubmitte i Brad u City Planner BB MS\ge Attachments. Exhibit "A" Exhibit "B" Exhibit "C" Exhibit "D" Exhibit "E" Draft Reso - Vicinity Map/Renal Photo - Tentative Parcel Map - Grading and Cross-Sections - Correspondence - Excerpt of the Development Code, Basic Development Standards ution of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16482 Na > a nnm,u vn o, w - w- O ~G a U LD r w a~ar w ~ ¢ mI~ v z 3 OmV z ~•-°USAGE DR `WILDFLOWER Z m}~ r ~ 3 ~ ~ 'TRpVELEP 4 4 ,rANGLEW00D OR iDR w1 W ~ MIGNONETTE ST ~ a ~ a ST ° LA VERNE ST GPsA g' ° J' ~ a, o, z o : -- - LA ' z `~~ NI ~:MONITE VISTA' i z GT to ` IST , ~j 5u gl~ ~? aQw; CIELITO STC - ~ ` 5u CIELIIO ST o' (/1 • o Iii LA VINE ST - ~ t { ¢~. I;'- ~LA RONDA ~,. ~ _t 57 ~ mn _ a _IAN llA GRANDE z , ST y F w' 't w z 1 ~~ W~ROBERDS ST ROBERD~ ST mE --T c - ' - - w CIILPEPPER Z _GT n~ g i kRtivi -- ~ ~ ZlALI W ALDER w ~; ST ST ,w I b I~ , I I ` ~ ALSA ST I ? > O Iota CANDLEWO~~ f' w YEW z ST ~ ~'~ , Hi N j a1~~, ~¢`, w, t JOI w' zl zl c~'~P, pl w1 xl IaT 1 `'\Q1~ zl YI zl w~ ~ i' ¢' I , Zo 1 - ,oF ~1 mi r°ni STl- .1 ~~~_ C 1 "' ~~ ~ N ~~ WI ( BIRCH: O 1 Q~G ~~ .' Qi 'II-_ !Ca ,tO, Q f ¢+ w, LFAJi ~~EyRSIMA \ J ~~u( ~~' CHIANTI 0' Z~ ZI TJ!°E W AFL ~' CNARDONNAY O:~ (nl Ji ~, ~t c, --. OU80NNEf Q1 I HARVARD 4`'``~" --_{'~ SAN BERNARDItJO Rb .~o~l '_ -- - -- w .'Z Q o z FAMILY `~ oiN-a$ ~t '~`' SPORTS ~ ESTACIA ST ~ CENTER n W :C a &Z o m CHELSEAWY~; ,<.,~ELs z :~ wjawbEVON ST ;D al ~~ ;o <t~ . S DR- ~ LD a • MIGNONETTE ' W ST a°o LEDIG DR Z 31 x O, ¢~ Zj gym ~2ONtE VISTA ST' V ~ 1P U LA VINE ST g - -.„ m ms , ~-~ MIGNONETTE '¢ "U "' { f~~ 3 a ST GNONETTE `m ~ o A ~iL ~ HOLLY ~~, +~ K ST D f $QR `3 ST b~ ~ . Y ,AVALON „3o q ~ r Z O .~w }. i1 ! Ull - ~Zg, - Q .. _ ~,.. +^ r NUNTINGTON DR GOLDEN -D y, ~ ~' ARROW Dx, CHESAPEAgE PL .Cw ¢' W w, GOLDS w;- ' r' LA JOLLADR 'mm; al <i ~< MOI _ WESTPORT OR '~ sZ CAMDEN DR YALE OR U U z a {ro LL TZ y 3 ~~,~TA CT D v f . . F- AGRANDE ST F LOMITA DR } S` LA MESA DR u: ~~ _oI ~' gl a= 5~ ;POBERDS a5 ! Q c7 `~ "~~' o Q°," e ~ ti i P , ,N: i > W a m T NWWUZ ~ r I1 a _ST ~~ > ,~ ' NOLIA y i w , y i w 1L0? _ _,~. ALTO__ ST s z ~ BALSAI ST . ~ .I .j w" ¢j 1 CIELITO ~T y~ `_ .. Y its ~; o al ¢ ~ BALSAS' ~; ~; ~~-,IQiANOip ~: Q I-~ ~ a' < CANDLEWOOD ST gl~% '`~`ooo sT= rl MONGAZi ~ ; a. F' N; s~ - - Z, S z O , 1=I UI ~7 wi ;MANGROVE O1 ¢' , i g =' OI ~ Y4 cc >I L' 5741 ~i O~ VEW gi ~ ST I 0 4 Y4 Q,YEW ~' ~t ~f :HURCH ST ; ~ ~ ' ~4 ~ 1 FIESTA PL - 2ADRIANOPL a? ~ w; i .,., _-.. .. .~ , .,. ,,, ,.... »...„.,-,,,..-. ;> IGSTON! a ~ w < ADDLED CT w LANGSTON ST z r - LANGSTON ST CAS1ANO c~RO j MLOCNjpST, I I ' ~ HEMLOC~( MADONNA CTpR $~ a< HEMLOCK 3T -15ERRANO: _ --iw--'.= ~. - --.I .. 1 w Z ST ~v ST Z'T'-'C Ii F'MAJESTY~~ 1 ~ W I U1 ~~ ~~ ~~EL_PASEO VI~ -}~E~-'~ ASNFORO CT I~ I ~ ~ y1 ~I ~ I 7' J WI ~I L~S4„''S~/ 'PASGWL LI ' -~ AMERICA (n, Q i Ji O W f 31I J~a NJ, tCf ~ < `~ ~~_ ~ I w Ya ¢~ ~ . psRV- °s\'e~ _>,aMA€FI -- F ~, z ~pR FI F ~TRVON ST, >'a { O. s~.p, NORJ/ICK ST ° ~ i wITRYON ST: ~ ~L~MONICA'qq.. ~ `~9 WY `- w i }1 2 BODEGA DR ~R ~y .,~PALOMA w E ' °o~ ~ ' U EFFEN ST - MARIPOSXAVE , rT ~~ 1 ~ -w- w - } elArrc.cTl Q K Ir ~ al g, i1 pl w~ ¢I v a~ g~ uoERACr~~c I~ I ~1 Z F-I ~I 1 ]w--- STAFFOR51, w O, F ¢ O Y• Q; ~I j~ ~$7 ALLESANORO SST 1a. I ¢I `' x - 5, Ftrel- ~ CENTRAL z~ - C°T - , ~; "~Z• s w 251 h ~ UI_ $t2110f1 2 j`ESTACIA CT ~ < ~ ri- ° ESTALIPDT 3~ FOOTHILL BL Y' f PoS2+.AMR,MYlL~'~~"'•u+. ~,-, +YP<w, ~ ~..,'i'v¢M1 n •, 1.. N,•.,:. , - x,+r-•r ,x-.m l•+v~ , s } 2 ~ ... ' ~ HAMPSHIfiIE ST .•""~" __. w._-.. .Q .,.,'4 . <.._ . _ . i ..~_ w ~ Q~ ~ w1 1 ,,,„ W• A ~ , Y; ~, g, O. ~ ' ,w .~ la ~ 2 ~~ I 1 Qt , j1 ~ Z Z„ r II V ~1 O, ! , ~ I W ~1 ~~ O z - ;i }I Ilj Wi g! < ~ ~ ~~ y! ST mIDEVON ~ o' i E~1/ON S'f i a /_ _ _ , .._ .D . ,.,,_ • ecolc°cT _ _-- ACER _ST __~1 Q} ¢i 6r a 3ocn , ST _W' U' ~ I ~° !n NT ST _: ~ ~1 J J;FRIANT ST ¢ i m C ~ Q' PL_ACER_ '~ T a 0 ¢, °I iCAN c Z ~.~_ _. ~U, EL~FAti ~ ~ DE~201 ~,~Zn y~ X / ' ~ ~ ~ / \ _ \ ~_ / - ~ _ \ _,F' - ` ~ ~ _ ~ ~ '/ / _ - -_= 1, ,e-;- TENTATIVE PARCEL - -- I~ i MAP NO. '16482 LHdi ppRTIDN OF LOi$ 1 1ND Z SUBDIVISION -B- NCdrnDNLd _ ~ ~ ~ OF VSdNVBEPNdPDINO ISTCIE DF iCa~IFDPN1 eD n$C pEPNMdp RECORDED _ i _ _ IN BOOK 20. vdLE d5 OF u>PS IN iNE OFFICE OF iNE COUNiV - `_ <=vl _ I- RECOPDEP OK 5>IO CDIINiV *~/ ~ ~ ~/ ~ ! - -~- - xwn nv ~ -- _ nos ..-~. '- _' ~ I 'G W i ' - xn n _ - - ~1 / ~7 - .o RO ~~.-is __ - nen _- ~ ' ~ - e n sa• - .mmox.~ ~ d L. ~ ~_ I ~ - ~ ~°~ - os .K611a a ~ _ _ - s -~ ;19 a~ . _ _ - ,_„ e, . PARCEL t - ~I ~,a;X y --- - , / _. _ - II - e ~ d a [ aon loxu om¢.na- _ it ° ppp 9 ` " % _" - PARCEL 2 e ~ ~ , 1.e --- 1 a -- ~_ ~ i _ i f - ~ -ms _ W9 f009[- _ s ~ e w n- - _~ ~. ~ i ~ i~l ,Y~ I I _ i 0 ~ \ -~ _ ,:' 0 / ' -- ~ h-_ __. _ - - ' iii '' , ~ ~ _ - -1~~\ - ~ ~ ~, I - i- -- A ~ _ ~ ~ I1 . - - ~ 1 ~ ~ - Kn~ ao- 'eye n-sra I ,~ I ~ - ' c I I I. I ~ , ~ . -- 11 _ a.. ..coq ~ ~ - "' - - - ~ JI -I __ -_a - - 1 I ~ ~ _ -_ ~ - ~ I ~ - = U =-- :_ - -- - - -- I - `~ _ , ~ I ~ - I ~~ __-_-.__`~c 4 '-21.-_ ! WI~ II --- - ' ' - - 1~ ~ W I -~ - "' - ~ - ~ - I - - I _-- - _ ~ _ I _ . _ O RIC Nl a/ OCVELMEn E11~tING 115[ :oxlxcivnovos[o uz[ rxm[a-o.i. s[[ rRU lw x.nr cK.mxc oux Fou ioxacR.cx¢ F[.*uR[s .[xuc m X _ _ _ _ \ E Ex 19,ING ~ - ~ RE910ENCE -' - ~.__ V `\ IPINL \ _ - _ --- - _ - ~ - .. _ / -. B f ~ - - - ~ _ --- ,, _- tP CxIS, EENC[ ___ - - o R[vuN - - - - ~ uB9. 51 p0"E 1T9 00 - _ \ V/ So xo R - 0 B[ REygVEO .' SEER LIlCR1L Ni 10 fL - PE=28.50 __ fx s, I q ~ ~ FF=29 17 __ A / ucu, I I _ $ ~,,R I (CONCEPTUAL 1 _o SY /~ _ ~Pel Ip / ^fx ~e I~ __ _ ~ _ _ w °E -0 enN J ' , v ~ .~^ R/Rti ~/- /rya°-- ~I rea/~ ~ ~~~ -_~~ -_ -- ~lN'°~ FF=28 67 `1\ ICONCEPTUAL7 ay ' ~ . ~ - '?. ~E iF ! l i sn arx Tc zE eo n .e ' ~~P ~ /O. SERVICE _ ~ - ~t ulN _ YIiN )/e' .E,fR ,}' ., ~`° - - oROROSm a 5>L I, ~ fx l5i EENCE '~ ~ _ _ ~`. - - ~ ~w //J _ CE Bl IXeval IS ) _ _ 20 BE REaVEO __ i •j / GeROfM ON 2 ] q[il ~Il V~ 2` N __ -~-' ' NB9•eT'00'E 2T5 B0, I -_-_ ~'. _ CpI _ _ . _ -~~ P~ ] ~~/ I ~ -'~ / - I ---~ ~ Ex IST ING ' 1 _ - I RE910EUtE _ i ` ~ EYI9TING R~p,,v~E''•~~~- RES I~OENCE .~_ -- II 1IIll~~lry lr2'p ~ Gggdmsn vi'^ CITY Of ReNCHOLCUC4u0n ll/Il~Y `U11Il ll Q~e5511C1E7($ p•,'~ w.olxc o c.n 915, EIDER per ne mm an~ev RINCHO CUUYONLe Ru eeex s ~ s ! ! ~ N ~ - --- - 1 _-~ - Cxl9 EEx[E II~ \ i 1 _- - - - ~. NB9 ST OOZE 2T5 BO - _ - 10 REUyN- I ~ ~' --I- ( - ________-_" __-- _- _"-_ _ __ - - _"-_ ~___ -__~_ -_ ~il` E Si s(LLf~ ~ •~0 xxlx _ \ -`_ `.~ 111 i' r~1-Lxt _ --~ _ IB 10 fl 1 r .o0plaua `~ 'O NP' - __ _ R ulx ~{ CfDl G.IIQI~ PE=28 50 rv ///jn-Ton ~ ~ <i °B (f4ii ~ _ I s i 1 ' "P T LLL_~~~~ FF=29.17 D__ w ~y~ (CONCEPTUAL-i ~' = __ ~IW D o W f - ~ I °: I I; '1 N y i li fi 9 c PE=28 00 al 1 r ExfR '~ rucx. W R4- - __ _.~ / p FF=28 67 lil _ ~ I (CONCEPTUALI y'! Ii = `" =~i =- l ~~ _ ~~ ~ rll~- 1'~iER`7 ~n 21 IS .~ ,1 SER f_~ 1 rcxlx rE--_ `---' v . IJ -~ xci RBx<' ~ WJI ' -_ _ _ - / _ _ _ Iy9~II1L I ~'If _ , - 1 ~EVIST Z _ - -- -~ _ - - ,l Ylx _ ~ ~n 6 Rb W -- - ~ - ~ -_ -- - - -- zE - - ,~- - NB95T'DO'E ITS BO _ ° ' 1 }lI ____ ~ - E%ISL fFxCE ~ - ORDPOS[D B 0 SPLIT I ~~p~ / r Z ~0 BE REWVEO ~ EsEE BIOExwgL i6 I sTh ~ I GLRpfN ryl t REiI ! f _I _ y 1 x ` ( ~ I -~ ~ - - - - ,I ~~_ ~~ .iD .~ ~ ~~ ~I _ ~ R.. P ~h ~ 3 __ 30 W __ ExISTING -~ __-_ r ~ ~ ~ I RES IOENGE u+o i»L ,.a'~ y o l uza '~ ,~• SECTION A-A -~ - a u7 wo SECTION B-8 uzo ` u." ...~_„ B uxo SECTION C-C uµ ~;; .,o i~+o uJO ,I 1 I ,~. ,~, L .., ~~:~,. ... qua SECTION D-D .~N .B.;l';e "" CROSS SECTIONS 1f~Y~~1~P1~~ Gggde,.s,. cilr Or anrlcXO cuc<MOnica 1lJd ~/li°f16~°'~ G~ SSacI~tES `""o~"` """ ~~"yam, l~ v 1560 XE uL 4~N 9VE NtlE ~ ~ 6 9251 EILEa vnv ~Ba B} Na ~i Mazch 23, 2004 CITY OF ~igrVCNO ; UCAO~~NGq rlr~rc 2 4 2004 ~...-J Mr. Mike Smmth City of Rancho Cucamonga planning Department Re Tentative Pazcel Map SUBTPM16482-Joe Say Deaz Mr. Smith. This letter ~s in regard to our conversation today concermng the above mentioned tentative parcel map and my concerns, as the adjacent land owner, about future access to my property. I was pleased to see the design of the proposed cul-de-sac, which allows 40 feet for access from Eiger Way to the south of my property I am still concerned about access from Hellman Ave. in the event that, at some point, my land could be subdivided into more than one pazcel 3 appreciate your Ume and consideration m tlus matter and would welcome any suggestions you rmght have in the future. - a Sincerely, ~~~-~ ~P~ Linda Vaughan Belyeu 7510 Hellman Ave Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 9]730 (909)987-0428 EXHIBIT `D' f~9 Rancho Cucamon¢a Development Cade Secton 17 08 040 . 2 Optional Development Standards These standards are Intended to provide high standards for the development of protects of superior quality and compatibility The optional standards allow development at the higher end of the designated density range However, the standards and development expectations have been increased above and beyond the basic standards in order to ensure proper transitions and buffers from lower intense residential uses The ultimate density allowed in any residential district shall be determined through the residential land development design review process and public hearings as described In Chapter 17 O6 The Planning Commission shall have the authority to reasonably condition any residential development to ensure proper transition and compatibility to adtacent residential developments, existing or proposed 3 Mixed Use Development Standards For the purposes of establishing guidance for the application of individual land use regulations and development standards, ail Mixed Use Distract development proposals are subtect to master planning procedures as outlined in Section 17 20.030 Existing development standards for each land use category, as provided In Section 17.08 through 17.24, shall be the basis of standards for each category within a mixed use development plan, but they may be modified by the City during the Master Plan review process Development agreements between the property owners and the Clty may be used as implementation measures for any amended standards or review procedures B Basic Development Standards Table 17 OB 040-B sets forth minimum development standards for residential development protects filed up to the mid-point of the permitted density range f~ Table 17.08.040-B -Basic Development Standards VL L LM M MH H Lot Area Minimum Net Avera e 22,50 8,000 6,000 3 act`s 3 aci`~ 3 act`s Minimum Net 20,00 7,200 5,000 3 actU 3 act`i 3 act''t Number of Dwelling Units (Permitted Per Acre Up to Up to 4 p to 6 Up to 11 Up to 19 Up to 27 Minimum Dwelling Unit Size• Single-Family Attached 8 Detached Dwellin s 1,000 sq re feettN~ regardless of district Multiple Family Dwellings Efficient /Studio 550 sq re feet regardless of distract /01 - One Bedroom 650 s re feet regardless of distract Two Bedroom 800 s re feet regardless of distract Three or More Bedrooms 950 sq re feet regardless of distract Lot Dimensions Minimum Width (~ Required Front Setback) 90 Avg Vary+/ 10 65 Avg Vary+l-5 0 Avg ary+l- 5 N/R N/R N/R Minimum Corner Lot Width 100 70 50 N/R N/R N/R Minimum Depth 200 100 90 N/R N/R N/R Minimum Frontage at Front Pro ert Line 50 40 30 100 100 100 nn,......, ,... Lion i ..+ Frontage e) 30 20 20 50 50 50 EXHIBIT `E' ,7°6-11 ~~o VL L LM M MH H c E Setbacks:ta/IM/ ~a~+ 37 Avg ry+9 37 Avg N/R N/R i l/ / Front Yard Vary +!- 5 Vary +/- 5 5 5 Comer Side Yard 27 27 22 27 N/R N/R Intenor Slde Yard 10/15 5/10 5/10 tOtDj WR N/R Rear Yard 60 20 15 10tDi WR N/R At Intenor Slte Boundary 30/5 20/5 15/5 15/StOi 15/5tDj 15/StDi (Dwelling UniVAccassory Building) Residential Building Separations trill WR WR Requred Per Section 17 08 040-E Height Limrtationtx/ 35 35 35 35th 40i~ 55/~ Lot Coverage 25% 40% 50% 50% 50% 50% Maximum % tMi Open Space Required Private Open Space 2,000 1,000/ WR 00/150 225/150 150/100 150/100 N/R Ground Floor/ U r Sto Unit Common Open Space WR N/R N/R 30% 30°/, 30% (Minimum Pement) Usable Open Space 65% 60% 40% 35% 35% 35% (Prwete and Common) Recreation Area/Facility N/R N/R N/R Required Per Section 17 0a 040.H Landscapfg tci tci rci Required Per Section 17 OS 040-G Amenities WR WR R Required Per Section 17 08 040•R N/R =Not Required Notes (A) Excluding land necessary /or secondary streets and arterials and in hillside areas shall be dependent on [he slope/capaaty factor contained m Section 1724 080-B (B) As measured from [he ultimate curb face on public and private streets Refer to Table 17 08 040-C for additional setback (C) Venable front yards allowed pursuant to Section 17 08 060-H (D) Add 10 /eet if ad/scent to VL, L or LM d~stnct (E) Less than 18 feet /rom back of sidewalk requires automatic garage door openers (F) Limit one story within 100 /eat of VL or L district for multiple faintly dwellings (G) Perimeter landscaping and interior street trees (H) Asingle-family detached dwelling less than 1,000 square /eet may be authorized when a development exhibits innovative qualities in tract, plot, and architectural design through the approval of a Conditional Use Permit (I) Senior cd¢en pro/acts are exempted from this regwrement (J) To assure that smaller units are not concentrated in any one area or protect, the following percentage limitations of [he total number o/ units shall apply 10 percent for eN~crency/studio and 35 percent for one bedroom or up to 35 percent combined Subject to a Condrt~onal Use Permit, the Planning Commission may authorize a greater rafio o/ efliciency or one-bedroom units when a development exhibits innovative design qualities and a balanced mix of unit sizes and types (K) In hillside areas, heights shall be 6mded to 30 /eat as specified m Section 17 24 070-D 1 (L) On existing lots of record, parcels less than 3 acres or less than the required minimum frontage may only be developed at the lowest end of the permitted density range (M) In addition to the standards set forth in Table 1708 040-8, development within the Caryn Planned Community shall be governed by the standards outlined in Table 17 14 040-A • C Ootional Development Standards Table 17 08 040-C sets forth minimum development standards for residential development pro)ects filed up to the maximum density permitted by the density range y~l „/o, 17 OS-12 RESOLUTION NO 04-88 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16482, A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE A PARCEL OF 65 NET ACRE INTO TWO LOTS IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF HELLMANAVENUEATTHETERMINUSOFEIGERWAY-APN 0208-162-30 A Rentals 1 Creative Budding Concepts filed an application for the approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16482, as descnbed in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter m this Resolution, the subtect Tentative Parcel Map request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 14th day of July 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and conGuded said heanng on that date All legal preregwsites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 The Planning Commission hereby spenfically finds that all of the facts set forth m the Rentals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon substantial evidence presented to the Plannng Commission dunng the above-referenced public heanng on July 14, 2004, including wntten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, the Planning Commission hereby spenfically finds as follows a The application applies to a vacant parcel of 30,008 square feet within the Low (L) Residential Distnct, located on the west side of Hellman Avenue at the terminus of Eiger Way, and b The application contemplates the subdivision of the subtect parcel into ivvo separate parcels of 13,980 square feet (Parcel 1) and 13,025 square feet (Parcel 2), v~nth dimensions of about 110 feet wide by 134 feet deep (average), and 110 feet wide by 118 feet deep, respectively, and c Parcel 1 will have access to Eiger Way and a street frontage of about 96 feet, while Parcel 2 will have access to Hellman Avenue and a street frontage of 110 feet, and d At this time, the applicant has not submitted any proposals to construct any residential structures on either parcel Therefore, both parcels will remain vacant pending future development, and e The properties surrounding the subject site are zoned Low (L) Residential Distnct, with varying dimensions and lot sizes and, with the exception of the property to the east, are improved with residential structures The property to the east is Cucamonga Middle School pia PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-88 SUBTPM16482-CREATIVE BUILDING CONCEPTS July 14, 2004 Page 2 f The project site is less than 5 acres in area, no variances or minor exceptions are regwred, all services and access are available, the parcel was not previously subdivided in the past two years, and has slope of less than 20 percent, therefore, is categorically exempt from Environmental Review per CEQA Guidelines Section 15315 (Class 15 Exemption -Minor Land Divisions) 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the Planning Commission during the above-referenced public hearing, and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a The Tentative Parcel Map is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code, and b The proposed subdivision, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially intunous to properties or improvements in the vicinity 4 This Commission hereby finds and detemtines that the protect identfied in this Resolution is categorically exempt from the regwrements of the California Envvonmental QualrtyAct of 1970, as amended, and the Gwdelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15315, Class 15, of the State CEQA Guidelines 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth m paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every conddion set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Enoineenng Division 1) Dedicate right-of-way to facilitate an offset reduced radws turn around terminus for Eiger Way Modify City Standard No 113 to include an offset in the standard turn around design Dedicate 40 feet of frontage at the northwest comer of parcel 1 to loin offset turn around street nght- of-way for future access to the property to the north 2) Development will be regwred to install full frontage improvements along the west side of Hellman Avenue to centerline of street, including but not limited to, curb and gutter, pavement, dove approach, property line adtacent sidewalk, streetlights, street trees, traffic signs and striping All Public improvements to be in accordance with the City's "Collector" Street Design Standards Protect all existing improvements orreplace 3) Proposed driveways on Hellman Avenue shall have a'hammerhead' or 'arcular' design to prevent backing out onto Hellman Avenue Revise City Drawing No 608 to reflect construction of the new drive approach and the location of the existing drive approach to the satisfaction of the City Engineer 4) Development will be required to install frontage improvements on Eiger i Way, including but not limited to, curb and gutter, pavement, drive fir' approach, sidewalk and street trees All Public frontage improvements ~/3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-88 SUBTPM16482-CREATIVE BUILDING CONCEPTS July 14, 2004 Page 3 to be in accordance with the City's "Local" Street Design Standards modified to the satisfaction of the City Engineer Transition to offset reduced radius design shall loin existing, any removals of existing improvements needed to facilitate the transition to an offset reduced radws tum around acceptable to the City Engineer, shall be replaced in kind Protect all other existing improvements or replace 5) On Eiger Way provide a standard residential dnve approach, 16 feet wide for future use by property to the north (APN 0208-162-38) Fill in the balance of that 40-foot wide nght-of-way with grouted rockscape to specifications and the satisfaction of the City Engineer 6) Parkways shall slope at 2 percent from the top of curb to 1-foot behind the sidewalk along all street frontages 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF JULY 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~1 tL J BY Rich Macias, Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission forthe City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Plamm~g Commission held on the 14th day of July 2004, by the follovnng vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS /! ~7 ~~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: SUBTPM 16482 SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP APPLICANT: CREATIVE BUILDING CONCPETS LOCATION: WEST SIDE OF HELLMAN AVENUE, TERMINUS OF EIGER WAY APN: 0208 162 30 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: ~. General Requirements 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the Ctty, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the Ctty, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such partiapation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition B. Time Limits This tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval C. Site Development The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of bwlding permit issuance SC-1-04 Completion Date ~-/- _/-/- _/~_ / / i \planning\hnal\pingcomm\tpm subtpm16482 conds7-14 tloc • /~ Protect No SUBTPM76482 Comolehon Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: D. Dedication and Vehicular Access Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline) 33 total feet on HELLMAN AVENUE Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall bequit-claimed or delineated on the final map - E. Street Improvements Pursuant to Ciry Council Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except that in developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb & Gutter AC Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Islantl Bike 7rad Other HELLMAN AVENUE X X X X X X EIGER WAY X X X X X X Improvement Plans and Construction a Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, priorto final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the Clty Engineer d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along mator or secondary streets and at Intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the Clty Engineer SC-1-04 i \planning\final\pingcomm\tpm subtpm16482 conds7-14 doc ~6~ • ~-~- / / -~-~- -~-~- -/-/ ~_~- / / -~-~- / / Protect No SUBTPM16482 Comoletion Date Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at Intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-Inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer f Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check 4 Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typically sheet 1) " Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans The City Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional information, contact the Project Engineer Mm Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name - Space Spacing Size Oty EIGER WAY SELECT APPROPRIATE TREE FROM THE APPROVED STREET TREE LIST FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA HELLMAN WAY Gegera parviflora Austria) Willow 5' 20' O C 15 GAL FILL UNDER UTILITIES Lagerstroemia indica Crape Myrtle Hybnd IN Tuscarore' -Pink 3' 20' O C 24" BOX Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector Any unusual towcities or nutnent deficiencies may regwre backbll soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Division 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only F. Public Maintenance Areas A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer _/-/. ~-/- -/-/. -/-/. -/-/- / / -/~- r~ '~ J sc-f -oa i \planning\final\pingcomm\tpm subtpm16482 conds7-14 doc s/~!~ Protect No SUBTPM16482 Completion Date G. Improvement Completion If the regwred public improvements are not completed prior to approval of the final parcel map, an improvement security accompanied by an agreement executed by the Developer and the City will be regwred for All public improvements (installation of street trees may be deferred until development H. Utilities Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as required The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requrements of the Cucamonga County Water Distract (CCW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fue Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CCW D is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential protects Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved Approval of the final parcel map will be subtect to any requirements that may be received from them General Requirements and Approvals Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the fvst six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved Prior to the issuance of bwlding permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Division when the first building permit application is submitted to Bwlding and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Division within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition protect -~-~~ -~-~- / / / / -/-J / / sc-,-oa i \planning\final\pingcomm\tpm subtpm16482 conds7-14 doc ~l~ RANCHO C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE July 14, 2004 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, City Planner BY Vance Pomeroy, Contract Planner SUBJECT TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16481 -CREATIVE BUILDING CONCEPTS - A request to subdivide 957 acre of land into 3 lots, 2 lots to front on Hamilton Street and 1 lot to front on 19th Street in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located near the southwest corner of 19th Street and Cartilla Avenue - APN -1076-151-04 • PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Surroundino Land Use and Zoning North - Single-family residential, Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - Single-family residential, Low Residential District (2-4 dwellmg units per acre) East - Single-family residential, Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West - Single-family residential, Low Residential Distract (2-4 dwelling units per acre) B General Pian Designations Project Site - Low Residential Distract (2-4 dwelling units per acre) North - Low Residential Distract (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - Low Residential District (2-4 dwellmg units per acre) East - Low Residential Distract (2-4 dwellmg units per acre) West - Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) C Site Charactenstics The 41,700 square foot (0 9573 acre) property is 75 feet wide and 556 feet deep with frontage on 19th Street and is traversed by the 60-foot-wide easement of Hamilton Street approximately 303 feet south of 19th Street The site is occupied by a single-family residence on the north end The site falls approximately 18 feet from the north to the south (3 2 percent) ANALYSIS A Parcel Map In contunction with the development proposal, the applicant has submitted a tentative parcel map to divide the site into 3 parcels, 1 for the existing residence and 2 conceptually sized for single-family residences This map exceeds the minimum parcel size regwrements for the Low Residential zone of 7,200 square feet with an average of 12,388 square feet ITEM I PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM16481 -CREATIVE BUILDING CONCEPTS July 14, 2004 Page 2 1 Parcel 1 = 14,419 square feet 2 Parcel 2 = 9,498 square feet 3 Parcel 3 = 13,248 square feet B General The Tentative Parcel Map provides for the offer to dedicate the easement portion that is a part of Hamilton Street to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Parcel 1 and Parcel 2 are of sufficient size to accommodate single-family residences and can be provided with utilities and sewer access on Hamilton Street C Gradino Review Committee The Grading Committee reviewed the protect on June 1, 2004 The Committee recommended approval, with a condition requiring that on Parcel 2, the slope of the drive approach shall not exceed 10 percent The Committee's conditions have been included in the attached Resolution of Approval D Environmental Assessment The protect site is less than 5 acres in area, no variances or minor exceptions are required, all services and access are available, the parcel was not previously subdivided in the past two years, and has slope of less than 20 percent, therefore, it is categorically exempt from Environmental Revew per CEQA Guidelines Section 15315 (Class 15 Exemption -Minor Land Divisions) . CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing m the Inland Vallev Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to ail property owners within a 300-foot radius of the protect site RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16481 by the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions Respectfully submitted, Brad Bu er City Planner BB VP/Is Attachments Exhibit "A" - Location Map (Aerial Photo) Exhibit "B" - Tentative Parcel Map Exhibit "C" - Conceptual Grading Plan Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16481 i 1-~a __ _____-_ _ ___ ___ __ _-rce ~-~_- - _1~--_-__ . - ~--- - t------- i -' - -- - -'---133 1S- ~ H18 -- --- -- _ __ - _-- -I- '~_ V __~ ~~r' _~`` ___ ~ ~ Z~ rim \~~ i nrFa¢ - - \ ~Nl ~ \ _~ _ / S ~~- ~1; _~ -~ ~ ~ ~c- ``'''~' -i- ~_~ ~~ ~U L ~ , °°~s' ~ ~- ~ o i ~ ]I ~ ~ _ 333------ _s I ~ i ~~ ~ ~ ~ V ~ k '~ - ~y Q r i J cool a; ~ ~ !i? ~ , -L _ N b ~ J. m c. een_ _ ~ a =~,W_,i ~_._-._ =_; ~- ~"- 133!!13 w a z o " n ,:~ ° -- ---E=-~-°5 ea-K.`~' lJCTJL ' _ i N ~r I ,1_. W o _ - ~ G tic- 7G /~ ~ 1; I / -. _ri 1---_; -~-- 6-~_ LL~~ --~-- __ _ L_ l , 1 _ _ ~ -r -_ ~ --~ _ r 1 ' I ~~ __ ~ _I ~ i ~_ - 17 - - I I I i i ~J ' / ~~• - 1 `t tl 1~ ~~ 62 ~ ~ ' ~ I ' ~g °6; u~ z9! a ~= 33k E y 9i ~~ ~ of i e Z ~t ea> > .4~ '- - x 8 src y 5 `•g~'- Y a°~ri 'IEiS~s lGFe"sc5 - [ --f :~sa9'. e :pai: _ ;~ 5i`:€ ~~ ~: 00 = sz V Y r~ _ _ : s ~ is °_ IoW n' a 'a S ~- O O ,- U U - rv n r a~: r ~ ~ - a b aas .a. :Y - Y. yy z~~ 3€ V S! Z `~~ - _ ~u ~~qq~ pipa -m> o° a -o° V' acc :s _ - ~a 5~ PI -T„~- T--_ !' ._ t a°~ ' '~ ~ L dux g ,? I ~7 d e Y : ~ __ _ ~ ,. Z ~ ~~_ '~ I ~ ' 'a ~ Q. I ~ ~ -. -~'~' °z '4e~ada1!$s3x ~ +`~ r~~lr~~ ~ ~ _~~, ~ - ,,,. ., ,,. =:c: sebx a4S i E 0 i r ! _~ .. r F ! ~1 r i c ~{ i~ t j ~r$ Ii ft y a ~ ~ /t° r; { tj I rt f i . `f 5~ { ~! S r fi Ff j C { ~ L `a tF a is '${ - ! t v j { { ' f;r t ~~ F ii f'{~ ;i ~?~j !j ` {~ t;v ~ ~! ~; f j~ i t f~~ je 1` ! ~ 't { 1.!} t i t e ja L~ i Ir ~ ~ }~i }r a ti e ~ P ~ E es }}! ! ii yyts! ji Ft{{t }"} ~ ~{ :~E a a t y ~tt { f$a ; : !! - ! i [° {r ! F E}• { t` 1 !{it~ r n t{t ~~ ~s °~ ~ 1 ~ 4 }•~ f~ i -" i j { ~ ~ Yg j ~~ ~'l rF ~' e!{~ ~! i ` !jt °~ EF.' ;$E~ 7 a. {, j• ~li . r fi$ $ ! [' ! { E 8 ! ~{ !r P r rf ! j sa F• - t t ;• !r S ! !~ ue_ t- Fe - r r at {E qr y {- s- } j -! ~f i [ c!{ c! •~ { Ir} r: ~°j. 1Faj j fr j{ff ~ ~{i !` j) tSl I ~ !!! ji F ra E tt c '{ c•t {r i f j~-$i i{j Te~i~ r" j ~: ~jF !S5~ i~ -rf !i r} !~~ i i {~° tj s= t ! '? tl 'jf ea rt r{f°::e2 }}!-ii •{$I ~i I r ier j{e it 1~ ti ° e ! Eb -{ F ~ 6f }$ $ 5 r C jr ij" s !{ 25 'S {5~ , 6_! 3I P!I j= ~~j j v '"r 1 w {jj a36 !~ -rt -~ r t{ !~ {jjF ~ ~a's -(_ !- f{- -: { f-~ a : 6 $ ~r - !`- i-~ a { { ~Er ~~ --{t a sl ~a s. { iF irF ~ }{ r { jt 1 F f e r d{ li jr ° _ ! • j- r fi ~ : lyr j I i _£- ~ ~ ..b. ! i t r a{ irli 3t i S~{ '~( = j 'i c z 11a r r !6 t$r r ~It irPF- ~j5 `¢F~r tl { {~ :~~ FPjI a!!i ~i ~' a€ =pI j {~ !F! ~! jsj ~ ~ 1 _ 's6-5= C < i ~ *i~ ~EE fE !!`t{3j ir, :}FE r;~fj r~ :- r~:t ! t6 ~'js {_(~f~ _tf • r ijr • ~ ~~s p j E e 8 b"i . ~ ~} i~j i{ F~I [re°_{ ~E; !}~Sj ~ilE ~r~ ~15 F '. !: st! :i ri ~ ~ r f{ (i6 ~~ t e `Sr ,_ ....ddd~~~ .~ : :! S f F-_ I e - $ rt ale 5 u - R C 1~' r _:Y _ i a I I I ~ II Y~,~~ _ I I ~ ~_ I i _ _ __ __ I ' _ 00 Se 3'f0 sr sex - ' n/5 ! %3 _.- - _ _ vs r x3~ ___ 1 ^ n I __ _ _. - _~_ __ ~ _ - ~o m } II n c ~1 e l a _ ~ 133H1S N~O~1lIWVH ' ug W~ I~~. ~ ~~- ~ I BI ICIr TCO SY.68x r "c~~CS++++~-~~~C---O-I LJJJtl "' _ uYl3s ,r t3 I I I • d 6 I Q i~ tlvrx Y a3 B ~~ W _ ~_ i~_'~_ _ _ ~ ' ~ _a^_\ i ~K a .O ~ _LJJ nrC__M3 _ ~ __r _ __ yy A~ I I~ I ~: \ I/U u ~ ~ I I '' • II W I I I I i ~ r o a ~` ~ ~ e~ __ _ ~~, ~m~ ~~ v ~ I s5 O 3 ~l f0 6~~1~ -~ ` - _ a ( , 8 J In N Q O N ~ .r mma W II II U W LL Z _ [L LL O ,_„~ U ~~ f~ z I I~ I _ool,l'll ~` wlx i~ -' 00 41 I ~.fi BS _ _~ ~~ I a I a ,1 it II ~ ~ ~ ~ ',' eg ~ I __ _ -I~ ._ .. I p ' g~ ~ ~ p ¢ Z a O r W V p w N N V J Z a- up -~ a a¢ r~ o a ~ o Sit ;,5 a S6b etl¢ ~~yy ~~ N ~. ~~ :R ~e IY ~,1 ~1 '~I 1 = ~ VIII ~ i ~" fl 6etl ~j_ ~_--- - - - - ~_ - 1 r -- - - ~ ! 1 i' '! ` ~ ~ ' - -- - - g P ° I I - I ~ r'a 9 I ~ I 1/ \ I i ~ ~ ,I ``,, ~` I J ~I I~ ~ I ~ i t i'i ~~ I 'I ' ~ -~ ! .~~ __ __ VAPIHB - _ _ ___ ~ C~ I VAR I - ~ i ~1 i -- I • I _ _ _ SC4F D _ , I -~' . D _- - _ -~ ~ _ csc I nnvmEn e e4x a uai ."L ~. JC ~ ~ Iq0 Il tl'E I$6 i] _ _ .. _ _ _ _ T ~~ _ _ ~.-____-~_ _ _ _ -_ - __ _ _ _ _-_ fx151 I rL I6 RRW g m ' ~ _~ _- y " A PE -ZY. Q~ ` EM ]lf ro ~DIID , 4 r[RD 4R y ~ LILMI I' °_ 1° EE=z Ql. ,67 6 BLOC[ . t5 9 I4 I '~ ih I (CONCEPTUAL) '"`^ " n 2"°"` r"` ~ ' ~ ` _ 6' PVC r I I P ]EMER IInv [[` _ ` D W rv I ', o< \ aEbvE [P 151 is , I~ I °!' D! ] m ~ I I i ]1RUCiURE I i I c lnu[t . sN I 22 Do vm.e .mnx[ n I R[R Clly SIO 1W I IL + ~ ~ E [a rL I R.11 . 54 r [' eVC _ i L ' ' gill El r 1 , I ~ J s00•11 I1 Y 126 )S IL ~ )U V ml 1, ~ r I I O~ ,O. I II ~ I 40. EYL]l 6 &LEx .LL ~ f- VVC , I .. - \ euRas mE oR.`x la REU[IN + 1 y ~ EP clrr S1DIi xo lal. ,i D ~euv.lE.nR.uucE I 6 r[R[CL ] I W ' W I I I I W N r t ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ I ~ 4 ,I ~ I 1° ~ i 11 ~ [runic R/M I W ai 1 I E I 'I I R[i[D[xc[ OIStIM'. I [[ISrlw. I n[SIDFxtC ~ 1 R[SIDfuCC 1 _ _r 111' F o~ O I - e- ~ I I 1, _ ! I ~ I _' r== -- Fil)rixG PES ID[xCE -- - rr I, ° ° a s LI TY OE a<NLN~ CUL•I ¶®~~~ dm sn ~ v~ G s n 4n.DIx4 .L.x ll ~ ~ssaurts NeuILIDN SiREEI ® ~ ~~ ~'~` D ~a)x. s room ~s~ei'Dx sn¢r TYPICAL SIDE VARD GRADING SECTION 9~ Id}p `~ taz0 S 1at0 1400 SECTION A-A ..1 K~1.~4 I~ e 1 Ia30 I 1420 ~.='~~R 1-010 SECTION B-B ' , laao } ., ~ .-- wzo 5 ~ - - .,.,~. p. ,:'t uto SECTION C-C a r 1410 SECTION D-D *`°` CROSS SECTI( CITT Of RnNCHO GL ~~Il~~lry py'p G d sn ~t1wrt LV `ldllll ll ~A I c+.oi.c 1.. SSOCIA ES NdHILION STREET ® g ~ 'LS^ *ITLE .wEET Y a emu a ~oTi~ iueltw sn ~ ~ i ~ RESOLUTION NO 04-89 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16481, A SUBDIVISION OF 957 ACRES OF LAND IN THE RESIDENTIAL LOW DISTRICT, LOCATED AT 10345 19TH STREET, INTO 3 LOTS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 1076-151-04 A Recitals 1 Creative Building Concepts filed an application for the approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16481 as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subtecl Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 14th day of July 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date All legal preregwsites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Rentals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and cored 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on July 14, 2004, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to property located at 10345 19th Street with a street frontage of 75 feet and lot depth of 556 feet and is presently improved with asingle-family residence, and b The property to the north of the subtect site is a single-family residence, the property to the south consists of a single-family residence, the property to the east is a single-family residence, and the property to the west is a single-family residence, and c The application proposes the subdivision into 3 parcels, and d The subdiwsion, together with the recommended conditions of approval, meets development standards for the City of Rancho Cucamonga e The protect site is less than 5 acres in area, no variances or minor exceptions are required, all services and access are available, the parcel was not previously subdivided m the past two years, and has slope of less than 20 percent, therefore, is categorically exempt from Environmental Review per CEQA Gwdelmes Section 15315 (Class 15 Exemption -Minor Land Divisions) 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows .erg PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-89 SUBTPM16481 -CREATIVE BUILDING CONCEPTS July 14, 2004 Page 2 a That the Tentative Parcel Map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and b The design or improvements of the Tentative Parcel Map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and c The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed, and d The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat, and e The Tentative Parcel Map is not likely to cause senous public health problems, and f The design of the Tentative Parcel Map will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdrnsion 4 Based upon the facts and information provided in the applicatidn request, the probed is categoncally exempt from Environmental Review per CEQA Guidelines Section 15315 (Class 15 Exemption -Minor Land Divisions) 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subled to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Plamm~p Division 1) At Parcel 2, the slope of the dnve approach shall not exceed 10 percent Enomeenng Division 1) Parcel 2 shall accept the drainage from Parcel 3, provide on Parcel Map 2) No new dnveway to 19th Street will be accepted Protect existing curb and gutter, sidewalk and streetlight, or repair as required Protect existing R26(s) 'No Stopping' signs The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF JULY 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Rich Macias, Chairman .z~v PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-89 SUBTPM16461 -CREATIVE BUILDING CONCEPTS July 14, 2004 Page 3 ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Plannmg Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of July 2004, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS u ~'// COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM 16481 SUBJECT: Subdivision for 3 Residential lots APPLICANT: Creative Bwlding Concepts LOCATION: Near SWC of 19th Street and Cartilla Avenue ALL OF THE FOLLOWlN6 CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACTTHE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Completion Date General Requirements 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its _/_/_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition B. Time Limits 1 This tentatroe parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a ~_/_ complete final map is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance wdh the approved plans which include ~_/_ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations 2 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/_/ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, bwlding, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes fvst 3 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all _/_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance ~ ~~ SC-07-03 Q 1 Protect No SUBTPM16481 Completion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: D. E. All public Improvements (Interior streets, drainagefacillties, communltytrails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to Clty Standards Interior street Improvements shall Include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, streetlights, and street trees Pursuant to CIry Council Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all Improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the Ciry Council, except that In developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development Construct the following perimeter street Improvements Including, but not limited to Street Name Curb 8 Gutter AC Pvmt Side• walk Dnve Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Trail Other 19th Street X Hamilton StreeUnorth side X X Hamilton StreeUsouth side X X 4 Improvement Plans and Construction Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the CIry Engineer Securlry shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the Clty Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, priorto final map approval or the issuance of bwlding permits, whichever occurs first SC-07-03 Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the Clty for all Interior public streets, community trails, publtc paseos, publtc landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage faculties as shown on the plans and/or tentative map Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot dramage, local feeder trails, etc) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map - 2 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline) 60 total feet on Hamilton Street 3 Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map 4 All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall bequit-claimed or delineated on the final map Street Improvements T/3 2 _/-/- -/-/- / / -/.~_ / / _/~_ r1 L.J -/~_ -/~-. r ~ Protect No SUBTPM16481 Comoletion Date b Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a • construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits regwred c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal condwt, and interconnect condwt shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer r ~ L J d Existing City roads regwring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are requued A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer e Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots f Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program Provide a minimum of 3-inch conduit for future fiber optic use on all streets with connection through the parkway to each Ict or parcel (fiber-to-the curb, FTTC) The size, placement, and location of the conduit shall be shown on the Street Improvement Plans and subfect to City Engineer review and approval prior to issuance of building permits or final map approval, whichever comes first Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed legend and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans Where public landscape plans are regwred, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans The City Engineer reserves the right to adtust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional information, contact the Protect Engineer Mm Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spaeing Size' Oty 19' Street Lagerstroemia Crape Myrtle Hybrid 3' 20' 24" Fill indica "Muskogee' -Lavender O C Box in Hamilton Street Lagerstroemia Crape Myrtle Hybrid 3' 20' 24" indica "Muskogee' -Lavender O C Box 'TREES SHALL BE 15-GALLON SIZE UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED r1 LJ SC-07-03 Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may regwre backfiil soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector 3) All street trees are subfect to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Division 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all protect intersections, including driveways Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required _~'/~ / / / / ! / / / _/~- / / ~-~- -~-~- Project No SUBTPM76481 ComoleM1On Date F G. H. Public Maintenance Areas htin e and Li ndsca t L f th / /~ g g p e appropria e a orm 1 A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or _ _ Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer Drainage and Flood Control 1 A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map _/_/_ approval or the issuance of bulding permits, whichever occurs first All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer 2 Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surtace drainage entering the _/_/_ property from adjacent areas 3 Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drainpipe measured _/_/_ from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk Improvement Completion 1 If the requred public improvements are not completed prior to approval of the final parcel map, _/_/_ an improvement certificate shall be placed upon the final parcel map, stating that they will be completed upon development for Parr=~ ~ ~~r+ c=roel 2 on Hamilton Street Utilities 1 Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, _/~_ electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as required 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary _/_/_ 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the _/_/_ Cucamonga County W ater District (CCW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CCW D is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs fvst Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects 4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved _/_/_ Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them General Requirements and Approvals 1 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all _/_/_ new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved 2 Prior to the issuance of bulding permits, a Diversion Deposd and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposd is fully refundable it at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Division when the first building permit application is submitted to Bwlding and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Droision within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project SC-07-03 Z'iS' 4 T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE July 14, 2004 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, Clty Planner gY Cathy Moms, Planning Specialist SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2004-00371 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to change the General Plan land use designation from Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) to Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) for approximately 9 • acres of land, located at the northwest and southwest corners of Victoria Street and East Avenue -APN 0227-061-38, 70, 71, 72, 78, and 81 and 0227-121-38, 39, 40, 44, 45, and 46 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2004-00402 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to change the Etiwanda Specific Plan land use designation from Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) to Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) for approximately 9 acres of land, located at the northwest and southwest corners of Victoria Street and East Avenue -APN 0227-061-38, 70, 71, 72, 78, and 81, and 0227-121-38, 39, 40, 44, 45, and 46 BACKGROUND There are 12 subtect lots, 10 with existing homes and 2 that have been issued building permits The smallest of these lots is approximately 19,500 square feet and the remainder of the lots range in size from approximately 21,000 square feet to 52,000 square feet The current zoning of Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre), requires that lots be a minimum of 10,000 square feet The current lot sizes far exceed the minimum lot sizes and In most cases, exceed the minimum lot sizes required for Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) These amendments were Initiated in response to a letter and petition sent to Mayor Alexander The subtect neighborhood was concerned that one lot owner would attempt to divide their 30,000 square foot lot into 2 or more lots A copy of the letter and petition are attached (Exhibits • "B" and "C") ITEMS J & K PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA DRC2004-00371 & ESPA DRC2004-00402 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA July 14, 2004 Page 2 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Surrounding Land Use and Zoning - Etiwanda Soecitlc Nlan Protect Site - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) Proposed - Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling urnts per acre) North -Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South -Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East -Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West -Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) B General Plan Designations Protect Site- Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) Proposed - Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling urnts per acre) North -Low Residential (2-4 dwelling urnts per acre) South -Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East -Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West -Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) C Site Characteristics The site is located at the northwest and southwest corners of . Victoria Street and East Avenue in the southeast quadrant of the Etiwanda Specific Plan Ten single-family houses exist on 10 of the lots, and building permits have been issued for the remaining 2 lots There are two schools, a middle school to the west and a high school to the east, within 1/2 mile of the protect site The site is relatively level with no unique features ANALYSIS A General Because of the existing lot dimensions, it would not be possible to subdivide the lots and meet current Development Code and Etiwanda Specific Plan basic development standards without making 9 of the 12 lots flag lots Amending the General Plan and the Etiwanda Speafic Plan from Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre), to Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) would make the zoning of these lots consistent with the already existing lot sizes and conditions B Environmental Assessment An Initial Study was completed and the protect was found to propose no new negative environmental impacts on the protect site or the surrounding area A Negative Declaration has been prepared and the California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review is required and no further action to the Environmental Assessment is required at this time CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public heanng in the Inland Valley Dady Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners • within a 300-foot radius of the protect site S, K ~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA DRC2004-00371 & ESPA DRC2004-00402 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA . July 14, 2004 Page 3 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend issuance of a Negative Declaration and approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00371 and Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment DRC2004-00402 to the City Council through the adoption of the attached Draft Resolutions Recommending Approval Respectfuli submitt Bra City Planner BB CM Is Attachments Exhibit "A" -Site Plan Exhibit "B" -Letter Requesting Redesignation Dated February 26, 2004 Exhibit "C" -Petition Exhibit "D" -Initial Study • Draft Resolution Recommending Approval for DRC2004-00371 Draft Resolution Recommending Approval for DRC2004-00402 ~, !~i 3 GPA DRC2004-00371 ESPA DRC2004-00402 w z w Q u~ VICTORIA AVENUE GENERAL PLAN AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT EXISTING GENERAL PLAN AND SPECIFIC PLAN ® VL 0 L - MAP AMENDMENT AREA Exhibit ~~A° FROM LOW TO VERY LOW "t. tL U r~ U ~nr+T~oin cT _ 10788 Gvic Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)980-0677 February 26, 2004 VIA HAND DELIVERY TO TEMPORARY RECEPTION DESK Bill Alexander, Mayor City of Rancho Cucamonga Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 RE Victoria Street, West of East Avenue, Et~wanda Dear Brad There are nine houses and two vacant lots on the portion of V~ctona Street running from East Avenue westward approximately 1,500 feet Eight of those houses are m the Low residential planning area and one is m Very Low All of the houses are on lots m excess of the VL minimum and the average is not only greater than the required VL average, but probably higher than the Estate Residential average The neighborhood was recently concerned that one lot owner would attempt to divide their 30,000 square foot lot into two or more lots As a result of those concerns, a petition was circulated m the neighborhood, asking that the land use map for the neighborhood be adjusted to change the Low des~gnat~ons to a Very Low des~gnanon I have enclosed the ongmal, signed petition which consists of three pages with the same text, but dtfferent signatures. The signatures represent eight of the nine houses The north house is vacant. The former owner died and the new owner has not moved m yet I am confident that the ninth homeowner will be willing to sign when the petition ~s presented to him. I have not discussed this with the owner of the two lots, but one of the neighbors told me that he does not plan to subdivide. Exhibit "B" S, ~ ~ Bill Alexander, Mayor February 26, 2004 Page 2 The homeowners who live m the area west of East Avenue on Victona request that the City mihate a land use density change on the planning maps and a zoning change on the zoning maps, making the enure neighborhood ~ ' (except lots facing East Avenue) VL instead of L. Sincerely, i ( I ~~..~~ J ~a~nes anks, Jr JBJ paa Encl.• onginal petition, three pages cc Brad Buller, City Planner f~ J, Y~ lv REQUEST FOR PLANNING AND ZONING CHANGES January 31, 2004 TO: Richard Macias, Chairman of the Planning Comrmssion Richard Fletcher; Pam Stewart; Chnstme McPhail; Larry McNiel Members of the Planning Commission 1 Brad Buller, City Planner FROM' homeowners on Victona Street east of East Avenue We, the undersigned, are the owners of all of the homes east of the Ettwanda Intermediate School on the south side of Victona and all the homes east of the recently sold Rodnguez property on the north side of Vtctona, west of East Avenue All of our homes are on lots which are 30,000 square feet or more, with the average being closer to 45,000 square feet Most of our homes are currently in a Low Denisity area of the Ettwanda Specific Plan. We have been informed that in a Low Density area the lots are expected to average 15,000 square feet but they may be as small as 10,000 square feet We have also been informed that in the Very Low Density area the lots are expected to average 25,000 square feet but they may be as small as 20,000 square feet. We believe that the current planning and zoning maps for our neighborhood are in error We believe that the planning and zoning designations for our neighborhood should be Very Low We respectfully request that you initiate a planning and zoning change for our neighborhood, excluding parcels which face East Avenue. l n i~QQ ~- ..~~ '1 ,.... J ~~~8r ~3 5,1~~- Exhibit "C" REQUEST FOR PLANNING AND ZONING CHANGES January 31, 2004 T0. Richard Macias, Chairman of the Planning Comrmsston Rtchard Fletcher; Pam Stewart, Chnstme McPhail; Larry McNiel Members of the Planning Commission '~, Brad Buller, Ctty Planner FROM: homeowners on Vtctona Street east of East Avenue We, the undersigned, are the owners of all of the homes east of the Ettwanda Intermediate School on the south side of Vtctona and al] the homes east of the recently sold Rodnguez property on the north side of Vtctona, west of East Avenue. All of our homes are on lots which are 30,000 square feet or more, with the average being closer to 45,000 square feet. Most of our homes are currently in a Low Dentstty area of the Ettwanda Specific Plan. We have been informed that in a Low Density area the lots are expected to average 15,000 square feet but they may be as small as 10,000 square feet. We have also been informed that in the Very Low Density area the lots are expected to average 25,000 square feet but they may be as small as 20,000 -square feet We believe that the current planning and zoning maps for our neighborhood are m error We believe that the planning and zoning designations for our neighborhood should be Very Low We respectfully request that you initiate a planning and zoning change for our neighborhood, excluding parcels which~fiace East Avenue ~c~:~la F~c.~4~t- ~ a~~ t3 a t ~ 3233 Uic ria S . ~ s ~ V ~/./ .~ 7 UD s ~ l 7z-~tz 1/~~,TO~2r~S% ~' 11`i ~ • REQUEST FOR PLANNING AND ZONING CHANGES January 31, 2004 TO: Rtchard Macias, Chaitman of the Planning Commission Rtchard Fletcher, Pam Stewart, Chnsttne McPhail; Latry McNtel. Members of the Planning Commission 1 Brad Buller, City Planner FROM: homeowners on Vtctona Street east of East Avenue We, the undersigned, are the owners of al] of the homes east of the Ettwanda Intermediate School on the south side of Vtctona and all the homes east of the recently sold Rodnguez property on the north side of Vtctona, west of East Avenue. Al] of our homes are on lots which are 30,000 square feet or more, with the average being closer to 45,000 square feet. Most of our homes are currently in a Low Dentstty area of the Etiwanda Specific Plan We have been informed that in a Low Density area the lots are expected to average 15,000 square feet but they may be as small as 10,000 square feet We have also been informed that in the Very Low Density area the lots are expected to average 25,000 square feet but they may be as small as 20,000 square feet. We believe that the current planning and zoning maps for our neighborhood are in error We believe that the planning and zoning designations for our neighborhood should be Very Low. We respectfully request that you initiate a planning and zoning change for our neighborhood, excluding parcels which face East Avenue Clan S, I'Ylurillo fYl i~ hacl ~ Pe/~ 1313 Vic-for~a st. 132 `{ > `~,'-+~"" S~- t ~~ ENVIRONMENTAL - INFORMATION FORM (Part I -Initial Study) City of Rancho Cucamonga (Please type or print clearly using ink Use the tab key to move from one Ime to the next Ime ) Planning Drmson {sos> 4n-z7so The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City Policies, Ordinances, and Guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full. Upon review of the completed Initial Study Part I and the development application, additional information such as, but not limited to, traffic, noise, biological, drainage, and geological reports may be required. The project application will not be deemed complete unless the identified special studies/reports are submitted for review and accepted as complete and adequate. The project application will not be scheduled for Committees' review unless all required reports are submitted and deemed complete for staff to prepare the Initial Study Part II as required by CEQA. In addition to the filing fee, the applicant will be responsible to pay or reimburse the City, its agents, officers, and/or consultants for all costs for the preparation, review, analysis, recommendations, mitigations, etc., of any special studies or reports. Application Number for the protect to which this form pertains DRC2004-00371 and DRC2004-00402 Protect Trtle General Plan Amendment and Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment Name & Address of protect owner(s) City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Name & Address of developer or protect sponsor City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 I \PLANNING\CATHY\Iniaal Study Part1 dre2004-00371 doc Page 1 of 10 ~, K 1 ~ Rev 3/17/04 INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED Please note that It Is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure rnat the app6cahon Is complete at the hme of submdtal, Ctty stall will not be available to perform work regmred to provide missing mformahon Contact Person & Address Cathy Morris Planning Division \J 10500 Clvlc Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Name & Address of person preparing this form (If different from above) Telephone Number (909) 477-2750 Ext 4306 'i) Provide a full scale (8-1/2 x 11) copy o/the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the prolect srte, and indicate the site boundaries 2) Prowde a set of color photographs that show representative wews into the site from the north, south, east, and west, views into and from the site from the primary access points that serve the srte, and representative views of slgmf~cant features from the srte Include a map showing location of each photograph 3) Protect Location (describe) Northwest and southwest corners of Victoria Avenue and East i Avenue 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers (attach addtt~onal sheet /f necessary) 0227-061-38, 70, 71, 72, 78, r `aQd 81 and 0227-121-38 39 40 45 and 46 'S) Gross Srte Area (acJsq h) g g3 acres '6) Net Stte Area (total srte s¢e minus area of public streets & proposed dedications) 7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the prolect site (attach addtt~ona/ sheet l/necessary) Proposed protect Is a land use amendment which would lower density from Residential Low (2-4 dwelling units per acre) To Residential Very Low (1-2 dwelling units per acre) . I \PLANNING\CATHI'Vnillal Study Pant dre2004-00371 doc Page 2 of 10 ~' K I Rev 3/17/04 Information indicated by an asterisk (') is not required of non-construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff 8) Include a description o/all permits which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and othergovemmental agenaes in order to fully implement the prolect • No building permits well be required until new development occurs 9) Descnbe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the protect including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects Descnbe any existing structures on site (including age and condition) and the use o/the structures Attach photographs ofsignificant features described In addrton, cite all sources of in/ormahon (~ e , geological and/orhydrologic studies, biotic and archeological surveys, trafl~c studies) The prolect site does not fall within a sensitive biological area The soil consists of older alluvial fan deposits and the soil consists mainly of Soboba Stony Loamy sand with 2 to 9 percent slopes The property is not within a known fault hazard zone nor a flood hazard area East of the sublect property there is flood controVutility corridor 10) Descnbe the known cultural and/or historical aspects of the site Cite all sources of information (books, published reports and oral history) An historic landmark the Hippard Ranch built in 1916 is located adjacent to the sublect site on the south side of Victoria west of the prolect site . I \PLANNING\CATHI'Vnihal Study Pant dre2004-00371 doc Page 3 of 10 ~I ~ ~a Rev 3/17/04 11) Describe any noise sources and thetrleve/s that now affect the site (atrcraff, roadway noise, etc) and how they will affect proposed uses . There is currently road noise from Victoria Avenuefthe 210 Freeway and the 15 Freeway A zonlnq change from Low Residential to Very Low Resldentlal, well not create a new noise source 12J Describe the proposed prolect to detail Thts should provide an adequate description of the site to terms of ultimate use that will result /rom the proposed prolect Indicate tf there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment Attach additional sheet(s) tf necessary There are 12 ~tt¢s within this re-zone area The lot sizes range In feet to a high of 65,000 square feet There are 10 single family homes on 10 of the lots that range in age from 100 years old to lust completing construction in 2004 The remaining 2 lots are currently vacant, however both vacant lots are in review for the development of a single family residence on each of the lots The property directly north of the prolect Is vacant with ~sidential Low zonlnq (2-4 du/ac) The prope rty on the north side of Victoria to the west of the p rolect is vacant with residential Very Low zoning (1-2 du/ac) The property on the south side of Victoria to the west of the prolect Is zoned Resldentlal Very Low (1-2 du/ac) This same lot contains a Historic . Landmark known as the Hlppard Ranch 13) Describe the surrounding properties, including tnformahon on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc J, intensity of land use (one-faintly, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc) and scale o/development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc ) A historic landmark the Hlppard Ranch is located west of the prolect on the south side of Victoria The subject property is not wlthln any environmentally sensitive zones, either plants or animals 14) Will the proposed prolect change the pattern, scale, or character of the surrounding general area of the pro/ect~ Lower zonlnq should result in fewer impacts both noise and traffic, than the current zoning The lower zonlnq will not change the pattern scale, or character of the surrounding general area in a • negative manner I \PLANNING\CATHYUnitial Study Part1 dre2004-00371 doc Page 4 of 10 \ 1 f~ 1 ~ l Rev 3/17/04 15) Indicate the type o/short-term and long-term noise to be generated, mclud~ng source and amount How will these noise levels affect adjacent properties and on-s/te uses What methods of soundproofing are proposed . The zone change wlll not generate any new short-term or long-term nolse levels as no new development Is being proposed with this zone change '16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees Not appllcable 17) Indicate any bodes of water (mcludmg domestic water supplies) into which the site drams Not appllcable 18) Indicate expected amount o/water usage (See Attachment A for usage estimates) Far further clanficahon, please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water Distract at 987-2591 a Res/denhal (gal/day) b CommeraaUlnd (gaUday/ac) 19) Indicate proposed method o/sewage disposal Peak use (gaUDay) Peak use (gaUmm/ac) ^ Sepbc Tank ^ Sewer I(sephc tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests If discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed mdlcate expecteddadysewagegenerat~on (SeeAttachmentAforusageest~mates) For furtherclanficahon,pleasecontactthe Cucamonga Valley Water Dlstnct at 987-2591 a Restdenhal (gaUday) _ 6 CommerclaUlndustnal (gal/day/ac) RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number ofres/dentialunrts N/A Detached (md~cate range of parcel s¢es, minimum lot s¢e and max/mum lot s¢e N/A Attached Qnd~cate whether units are rental or /or sale units) N/A I \PLANNING\CATHY\Inillal Study Pant dre2004-00371 doc Page 5 of 10 J 1 ~ , ~ Rev 3/17/04 21) Anhcfpated range of sale paces and/or rents Sale Pace(s) $ to $ Rent (per month) $ to $ 22) Spec/fy number of bedrooms by unit type N/A 23) Indicate antlapated household s¢e by unit type N/A 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who will be res/dmg wrthrn the protect Contact the appropriate School Dfstncts as shown m Attachment B a Elementary b Junior Hfgh c Senior High COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL, AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Describe type of use(s) and major function(s) of commercial, mdustnal or mstrtuhonal uses 26) Total floor area o/commercial, mdustnal, or inshtuhonal uses by type 27) Indicate hours of operahon 28) Number of employees Total • Maximum Shiff Time o/Maximum Shiff I \PLANNING\CATHY\Initial Study Part1 dre2004-00371 doc Page 6 of 10 ~ I ~ I ~ Rev 3/17/04 29) Provide breakdown of anticipatedlob c/assif~cations, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an indication of the rate of hire for each classd~cahon (attach additional sheet if necessary) 30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside in the Cary '31) For commercial and industrial uses only, indicate the source, type, and amount o/air pollution emissions (Data should be ven/red through the South Ccast Air Quality Management Distract, at (818) 572-6283) ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water, sewer, fne, and flood control agencies serving the protect been contacted [o determine their ability to • provide adequate service to the proposed prolect~ I/so, please indicate their response Existing Infrastructure Is In place and no new development Is proposed along with this land use amendment 33) In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic matenals~ Examples ofhazardous and/or toxic materials include, but are not limited to PCB's, radioactive substances, pesticides and herbicides, fuels, oils,solvents, and other flammable liquids and gases Also note undergroundstomgeo/anyo/the above Please list the materials and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates o/use, it known None known I \PLANNING\CATHYVnillal Study Parti dre2004-00371 doc Page 7 of 10 ~ ~ ~ l `~ Rev 3/17/04 34) Wtlltheproposedprotechnvolvethetemporaryorlong-termuse,storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxicmatenals, including but not limited to those examples listed above If yes, prowde an inventory of all such materials to be used and proposed method of disposal The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans I hereby certify that the statements lumished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate evaluation of this protect to the best ofmy ability, that the /acts, statements, and information presented are true and correct [ot he best of my knowledge and belief 1 further understand that additional in/ormatton maybe required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City o/I Date ~ ~~ ~'~ I \PLANNING\CATHY\Inifial Study Part1 dre2004-00371 doc Page 8 of 10 Rev 3/17/04 ATTACHMENT "A" CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED WATER USE AND SEWER FLOWS FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT (Data Provided by Cucamonga Valley Water District February 2003) Water Usage Single-Family Multi-Family 1 Neighborhood Commerclal General Commerclal Office Professional InstitutionaUGovernment Industrial Park Large General Industrial Heavy Industrial (distribution) Sewer Flows Single-Family Multi-Family General Commercial Office Professional Industrial Park Large General Industrial Heavy Industrial (distribution) 705 gallons per EDU per day 256 gallons per EDU per day 1000 gal/day/unit (tenant) 4082 gal/day/urnt (tenant) 973 gal/day/unit (tenant) 6412 gal/day/unit (tenant) 1750 gaUday/urnt (tenant) 2020 gaUday/unit (tenant) 1863 gal/day/unit (tenant) 270 gallons per EDU per day 190 gallons per EDU per day 1900 gal/day/acre 1900 gal/day/acre Institutional/Government 3000 gal/day/acre 2020 gal/day/acre 1863 gal/day/acre Source Cucamonga Valley Water District Engineering & Water Resources Departments, Urban Water Management Plan 2000 • I \PLANNING\CATHYVninal Study Part1 dre2004-00377 doc S,KIg Page 9 of 10 Rev 3/17/04 ATTACHMENT B Contact the school dlstrlct for your area for amount and payment of school fees Elementary School Dlstncts Alta Loma 9350 Base Lme Road, Swte F Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 987-0766 Central 10601 Church Street, Swte 112 1 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)989-8541 Cucamonga 8776 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)987-8942 Etlwanda 6061 East Avenue P O Box 248 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 (909)899-2451 High School Chaffey Hlgh School 211 West 5th Street Ontario, CA 91762 (909) 988-8511 ~~n~-I I \PLANNING\CATHY\Intlial Study Part1 dre2004-00371 doc Page 10 of 10 Rev 3/17/04 City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1 Protect Fde. DRC2004-00371 and DRC2004-00402 2 ~ Related Fdes. Descnpt~on of Protect: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2004-00371 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to change the General Plan land use designation from Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) to Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) for approximately 9 acres of land, located at the northwest and southwest corners of Victoria Avenue and East Avenue -APN 0227-061-38, 70, 71, 72, 78 and 81, and 0227-121-38, 39, 40, 44, 45 and 46 Related file Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment DRC2004-00402 ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2004-00402 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to change the Etiwanda Speafic Plan land use designation from Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) to Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) for approximately 9 acres of land, located at the northwest and southwest corners of Victoria Avenue and East Avenue -APN 0227-061-38, 70, 71, 72, 78 and 81, and 0227-121-38, 39, 40, 44, 45 and 46 Related file General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00371 4. Protect Sponsor's Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 5 General Plan Designation Low Residential 6. Zomng• Low Residential 7 Surrounding Land Uses and Setting• Single-family homes with several undeveloped vacant parcels, zoned Low Residential and Very Low Residential 8. Lead Agency Name and Address• Cdy of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Droision 10500 Crnc Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9 Contact Person and Phone Number Cathy Morris, Planning Specialist (909) 477-2750, Ext 4306 10 Other agencies whose approval is regwred (e g , permits, financing approval, or participation agreement) N/A S,~haa i Initial Study for DRC2004-00371 AND DRC2004-00402 Cary of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2 GLOSSARY -The following abbreviations are used m this report EIR -Environmental Impact Report FEIR -Final Environmental Impact Report NOx -Nitrogen Oxides ROG -Reactive Organic Gases PM~o -Fine Particulate Matter RWQCB -Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD -South Coast Air Quality Management District URBEMIS7G -Urban Emissions Model S,-~al Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-00371 AND DRC2004-00402 Page 3 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this protect, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages OAesthetics O Agricultural Resources OAir Quality ()Biological Resources ()Cultural Resources ()Geology & Soils ( )~ Hazards & Waste Materials OHydrology & Water Quality OLand Use & Planning ()Mineral Resources ()Noise ()Population & Housing ()Public Services ()Recreation () TransportationlTraffic ()Utilities & Service Systems ()Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation (/) I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared () I find that although the proposed protect could have a significant effect on the environment, there wdl not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the protect have been made by, or agreed to, by the project proponent A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared () I find that the proposed protect MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required () I find that the proposed protect MAY have a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standard and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed () I find that although the proposed protect could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed protect, nothing further is requred Prepared By Reviewed By Date ~/ g~ ~ ` Date D ~-~ LJ ~_~ S,t~aa i Initial Study for DRC2004-00371 AND DRC2004-00402 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1 AESTHETICS Would the prolect a) Have a substantial affect a scenic vistas () () () (/) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, () () () (/) but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character () () () (/) ~ or quality of the site and its surroundings d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, () () () (/) which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area Comments a) There are no significant vistas within or adjacent to the prolect site The site is not within a caeca corridor according to General Plan Exhibit III-16 b) The prolect site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga c) The site is located at the northwest and southwest corners of Victoria Avenue and East Avenue and is charactenzed by residential development and vacant parcels to the north, south, east, and west The casual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this prolect Design review is not required pnor to approval City standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution d) The prolect will create new light and glare because the site is currently vacant The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on site plans which require review for consistency with City standards that requires shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare Lighting wtll be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the prolect site The impact is not considered significant 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES Would the prolect a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or () () () (/) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agncultural uses b) Conflict with ewsting zoning for agncultural use, or O O O (/) a Williamson Act contract c) Involve other changes in the existing environment, () () () (/) which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural uses Comments a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance The site is located northwest and southwest corners of Victoria Avenue and East Avenue and is charactenzed by residential development and vacant parcels to the ~,~ a3 Initial Study for DRC2004-00371 AND DRC2004-00402 Clty of Rancho Cucamonga Page 5 north, south, east, and west There are approximately 1,300 acres of Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, of which about one-third is either developed or committed to development according to General Plan Table IV-2 The major concentrations of designated farmlands are located in the southern and eastern portions of our City that is characterized by existing and planned development Further, two-thirds of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful, therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan The General Plan FEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City c) The site is located at the northwest and southwest comers of Victoria Avenue and East Avenue and is characterized by residential development and vacant parcels to the north, south, east, and west The nearest agricultural use (vineyards) is within a quarter mile of the property, however the agricultural use is an in-fdl project until the property is developed Therefore, no adverse impacts are antiapated 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the pro/ect a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the O O O (/) applicable air quality plan b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute () p () (/) substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase O O O (/) of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial () () () (/) pollutant concentrations e) Create objectionable odors affecting a () () () (/) substantial number of people Comments a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6), continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the atywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated b) During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities While most of the dust would settle on or near the project site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area Construction is an • • S, ~ ~ ~{- Inltlal Study for DRC2004-00371 AND DRC2004-00402 Clty of Rancho Cucamonga Page 6 on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area Construction workers and egwpment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete They then transfer to a different site where the process begins again Therefore, the emissions associated with construction activities are not new to the Rancho Cucamonga area and they would not violate an air quality standard or worsen the existing air quality in the region Because no new development is being proposed for this protect area, no new impacts are anticpated c) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The protect proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated Because no new development is being proposed for this protect area, no new impacts are anticipated • d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic faalities According to the SCAQMD, protects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401 According to the SCAQMD, protects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401 Because no new development is being proposed for this protect area, no new impacts are anticpated e) Because no new development is being proposed for this protect area, no new impacts are anticipated 4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the pro/ect a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or () () () (/) through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or speaal status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U S Fish and Wildlife Service b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian () () () (/) habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally () () () (/) protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any O O O (/) native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites s,KaS Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga • DRC2004-00371 AND DRC2004-00402 Page 7 e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances O O O (/) protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat O O O (/) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan Comments a) The pro/ect site is located in an area developed with residential uses The site has been previously disrupted during (construction of infrastructure and surrounding developments/annual discing for weed abatement) According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the pro/ect site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources, therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered speaes of plants or animals due to the fact that the protect is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan b) The protect site is located in an urban area with no natural communities No riparian habitat exists on-site, meaning the pro/ect will not have any impacts c) No wetland habitat is present on-site As a result, protect implementation would have no impact on these resources d) The ma/Drily of the surrounding area has been or is being developed, thereby disrupting any wildlife corridors that may have existed No adverse impacts are anticipated e) There are no heritage trees on the pro/ect site, therefore, the proposed pro/ect ~s not in conflict with any local ordinance f) The pro/ect site is not located within a conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Exhibit IV-4 No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur 5 CULTURAL RESOURCES Would the project a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () () () (/) significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064 5~ b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () () () (/) sigmficance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064 5~ c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique O O O (/) paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature d) Disturb any human remains, including those O O O (/) interred outside of formal cemeteries Comments• a) The pro/ect site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Muniapal Code Section 2 24 (Historic Preservation) There will be no impact b) There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the pro/ect site • ~,~ac~ Initial Study for DRC2004-00371 AND DRC2004-00402 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 8 c) The proposed protect is in an area that has already been disturbed by development The protect site has already been disrupted by (construction of infrastructure and surrounding developments/annual disang for weed abatement) No known religious or sacred sites exist within the protect area No adverse impacts are anticipated d) Because no new development is being proposed for this protect area, no new impacts are antiapated 6 GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would fhe pro/ect a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, intury, or death involving ~) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as () () () (/) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42 n) Strong seismic ground shakings O O O (`~) ni) Seismic-related ground failure, including O O O (/) liquefaction rv) Landslides O O O (/) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of () () () (/) topsoil c) Be located on a geologic umt or soil that is () () () (/) unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the protect, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table () () () (/) 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the () () () (/) use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater Comments• a) No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Exhibit V-1, and Section 5 1 of the General Plan FEIR The Red Hill Fault, passes within approximately 2 miles northwest of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 7 miles northwest These faults are both capable of produang M„, 6 0-7 0 earthquakes Also, the San Jaanto fault, capable of produang up to Mw 7 5 earthquakes ,is approximately 15 to 17 miles northeasterly of the site and the San Andreas, capable of up to M„, 8 2 earthquakes, is 15 to 17 miles northeasterly of the site Each of these faults can produce strong groundshaking Adhering to the Uniform Bwlding Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less-than-sign~a3nt S , I~ ~'~- Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga • DRC2004-00371 AND DRC2004-00402 Page 9 b) The Rancho Cucamonga area is subtect to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems Construction actroities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control, however, because no new development is being proposed for this protect area, no new impacts are anticipated c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 1) indicates that subsidence is generally assoaated with large decreases or withdrawals of water from the aquifer The protect would not withdraw water from the existing aquifer The site is not within a geotechnical hazardous area or other unstable geologic umt or soil type according to General Plan FEIR Figure 5 1-2 Sod types on-site consist of alluvial soil deposits Soil association according to General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5 1-3 No adverse impacts are anticipated d) The matority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the protect site, is located on alluvial soil deposits These types of soils are not considered to be expansive Sod types on-site consist of alluvial soil deposits Soil association according to General Plan Exhibit V-3 and General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5 1-3 These soils are typically Alluvial soil deposits No adverse impacts are anticipated e) The protect will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal No septic tanks or alternatwe wastewater disposal is proposed 7. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the pro/ect () () () (/) a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and acadent conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or () () () (/) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of () () () (/) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962 5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment e) For a protect located within an airport land use plan () () () (/) or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the protect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the protect area f) For a protect within the vicinity of a private airstrip, O O O (/) would the protect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the protect area g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with O O O (/) an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan • • ~t~050 Initial Study for DRC2004-00371 AND DRC2004-00402 Clty of Rancho Cucamonga Page 10 h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ~) ~) ~) ~/) loss, intury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands~ Comments• a) The protect will not involve the transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials The City part~cpates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive that any other m the state The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergences Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant No adverse impacts are expected b) The proposed protect does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the state The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant No adverse impacts are anticipated c) There are no schools located within '/.-mile of the pro/ect site The protect site is located within %rmile of the nearest existing or proposed school Typically, the uses proposed do not create obtectionable odors No adverse impacts are anticipated d) The proposed protect is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site Recent site inspection did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials No impact is anticipated e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport The protect site is located approximately 7 to 8 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is anticipated f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 '/z miles to the west of the City's westerly limits No impact is anticpated g) The City's Multi-Hazard Disaster Plan, which is updated every two years, includes polices and procedures to be administered by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District in the event of a disaster Because the project includes at least two points of public street access and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticpated h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from awind-driven fire in the Urban Wildland Interface area found in the northern part of the City according to the Fire District Strategic Plan 2000-2005, however, the proposed protect site is not located within a high fire hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-7 ~t ~~ I Initial Study for DRC2004-00371 AND DRC2004-00402 City of Rancho Cucamonga • Page 11 8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY Would the project () () () (/) a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or () () () (/ ) interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in agwfer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e g , the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted) c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of () () () (/) the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of () () () (/) the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off- site~ e) Create or contribute runoff water which would () () () (/) exceed the capaaty of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality O O O (/) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area () () () (/) as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation maps h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area () () () (/) structures that would impede or redirect flood flows i) Expose people or structures to a signrficant nsk of O O O (/) loss, intury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or damp ~) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow~ O O O (/) Comments• a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) and will not affect water quality standards or waste discharge requirements The protect is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems Because no new development is being proposed, no new impacts are antiapated b) According to CVWD, 43 percent of the City's water is currently provided from groundwater in the Cucamonga and Chino Basins CVWD has adopted a master plan that estimates demand needs until the year 2030 The proposed protect will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Exhibit IV-2 The ~', K 30 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-00371 AND DRC2004-00402 Page 12 development of the site will require the grading of the site and excavation, however, would not affect the existing agwfer, estimated to be about 288 to 470 feet below the ground surface Because no new development is being proposed, no new impacts are anticpated c) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff due to the amount of new bulding and hardscape proposed on a site, however, the protect will not alter the course of any stream or river All runoff wdl be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows The protect design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion A ' Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Bwlding Official and City Engineer pnor to issuance of grading permits Therefore, the protect wdl not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site The impact is not considered significant d) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff due to the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, the protect will not alter the course of any stream or river All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain faalities, which have been designed to handle the flows A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer pnor to issuance of grading permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site No impacts are anticipated e) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and nt of surface water runoff due to the amount of new building and hardscape proposed amou all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have however on a site , , been designed to handle the flows The protect will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Offical and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site No impacts are anticipated f) No housing units are proposed with this project No adverse impacts are expected g) The protect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected h) The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to convey a 100-year storm event The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Exhibit V-6 The protect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the protect site, therefore, impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City ~J 5,1=,31 Initial Study for DRC2004-00371 AND DRC2004-00402 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 13 9 LAND USE AND PLANNING Would the project a) Physically divide an established communiry~ O O O (/) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or () () () (/) regulation of an agency with turisdiction over the protect (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, Iocai coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect ~ c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation O O O (/) plan or natural community conservation plan Comments• a) The site is located at the northwest and southwest corners of Victoria Avenue and East Avenue and is characterized by residential development to the north, south, east, and west This protect will be of similar design and size to surrounding residential development to the north, south, east and west The protect will become a part of the larger community No adverse impacts are antiapated b) The protect site land use designation is Low Residential The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan and does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection As such, no impacts are antiapated c) The protect site ~s not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the protect site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources, therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered speaes of plants or animals due to the fact that the protect is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan 10 MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral () () () (/) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally () () () (/) important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan Comments• a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, therefore, there is no impact b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site, therefore, there is no impact ~,~,3a Initial Study for DRC2004-00371 AND DRC2004-00402 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 14 11 NOISE Would the project result m a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise () () () (/) levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive () () () (/) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise O O O (/) levels in the protect vicinity above levels existing without the protect d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in () () () (/) ambient noise levels in the protect vicinity above levels existing without the protect e) For a protect located within an airport land use plan () () () (/) or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the protect expose people residing or working in the protect area to excessive noise levels f) For a protect within the vianity of a private airstrip, O O O (/) would the protect expose people residing or working in the protect area to excessive noise levels Comments• a) The protect site is not within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Exhibit V-13 at build-out b) The uses associated with this type of protect normally do not induce ground borne vibrations As such, no impacts are anticipated c) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic The proposed activities will not significantly increase traffic, hence, are not anticipated to increase the ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the protect d) See a) response above e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport Located approximately 7 to 8 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is anticipated f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 '/: miles to the west of the City's westerly limits No impact is anticipated C~ ~~1~3'~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga • DRC2004-00371 AND DRC2004-00402 Page 15 12 POPULATION AND HOUSING Would the prolect a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, () () () (/) either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure) b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, () () () (/) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere ~ c) Displace substantial numbers of people, O O O (/) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere Comments: a) The prolect is located in a predominantly developed area and will not induce population growth No impacts are anticpated b) The prolect site contains no existing housing units No adverse impact expected c) The prolect site is vacant land No impacts are anticpated 13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the prolect result ~n substantial adverse physical impacts assoaated wrfh the provision of new or physically altered govemmental facilities, need for new or physically altered govemmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives (or any of the public services () () () (/) a) Fire protection b) Police protections O O O (/) c) Schools () () () (/) d) Parks () () () (/) e) Other public facihties~ O O O (/) Comments• a) The site, located at the northwest and southwest corners of Victoria Avenue and East Avenue, would be served by a fire station located approximately 2 mtles from the prolect site The prolect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Bwlding and Fire Codes will be placed on the prolect so no impacts to fire services will occur No impacts are anticipated b) Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the prolect will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the prolect site is within an area that is regularly patrolled c) The site is in a developed area currently served by the Etiwanda School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District The prolect will be required to pay School Fees as prescribed by State law prior to the issuance of building permits No impacts are anticipated i 5~~3~ Initial Study for DRC2004-00371 AND DRC2004-00402 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 16 d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park is located approximately 1-mile from the prolect site The prolect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees No impacts are anticipated e) The proposed prolect will utilize existing public faalities The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The prolect wail not requre the 1 ~ construction of any new faalities or alteration of any existing faalities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services According to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9 9), the prolected mcrease in Library space under the General Plan will not meet the prolected demand The General Plan FEIR identified the cumulative impact on I~brary services as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed prolect is consistent with the General Plan for which the EIR was prepared and impacts evaluated Smce the adoption of the General Plan, the City has planned a new library within the Victoria Gardens regional shopping center of approximately 22,000 square feet, which is in excess of the prolected need of 15,500 square feet at bwld-out of the City 14. RECREATION. Would the pro~ecf a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and () () () (/) regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated b) Does the prolect include recreational facddies or O O O (/) regwre the construction or expansion of recreational faalities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment Comments a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park is located approximately 1 mile from the prolect site This prolect is not proposing any new housing or large employment generator that would cause an increase in the use of parks or other recreational facilities A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay park development fees Because no new development is being proposed for this prolect area, no new impacts are anticpated b) See a) response above r1 L_J 15 TRANSPORTATIONITRAFFIC. Would the prolect a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substanhal m O O O (/) relation to the existing traffic load and capacty of the street system (i e , result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections) b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level () () () (/) of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways J,1~35 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga • DRC2004-00371 AND DRC2004-00402 Page 17 c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including O O O (/) either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design () () () (/) feature (e g , sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e g , farm equipment) e) Result in inadequate emergency access () () () (/) f) Result in inadequate parking capacdy~ O O O (/) g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs O O O (/) supporting alternative transportation (e g , bus turnouts, bicycle racks) Comments: a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 5), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated The protect is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in protect design The protect will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle taps, traffic volume or congestion at intersections The protect site will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation No impacts are anticipated b) The protect is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing The protect will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adtacent arterials The protect wdl be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site No impacts are anticipated c) Located approximately 7 to 8 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the Flight path and will not change air traffic patterns No impacts are anticpated d) The protect is in an area that is mostly developed The protect will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site The protect design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses The protect will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards due to a design feature No impacts are anticipated e) The protect will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles and will, therefore, not create an inadequate emergency access No impacts are anticipated f) The protect design has adequate parking in compliance with standards of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code and will, therefore, not create an inadequate parking capaaty No impacts are anticipated g) The protect design includes, or the project will be conditioned to provide, features supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction (e g ,bus bays, bicycle racks, carpool parking, etc ) • 5 ~ ~i 3lv • Initial Study for DRC2004-00371 AND DRC2004-00402 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 18 16 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS Would the pro/ect () () () (/) a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board b) Requre or result in the construction of new water () () () (/) or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing faalities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects I c) Require or result in the construction of new storm () () () (/) water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects ~ d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve () () () (/) the protect from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed e) Result in a determination by the wastewater () () () (/) treatment provider, which serves or may serve the protect, that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's protected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted () () () (/) capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and () () () (/) regulations related to solid waste Comments a) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located withm Rancho Cucamonga The project is regwred to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticpated b) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located withm Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity The project is regwred to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated c) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain faalities, which have been designed to handle the flows A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Budding Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits The impact is not considered significant d) The project is served by the CVWD water system There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this project No impacts are anticipated e) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity No impacts are anticipated 5,1~3~ Initial Study for DRC2004-00371 AND DRC2004-00402 City of Rancho Cucamonga . Page 19 f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capaaty to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs g) This protect complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939 Therefore, no impacts are anticipated 17 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE 1 a) Does the protect have the potential to degrade the () () () (/) quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife speces, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the mator periods of California history or prehistory b) Does the protect have impacts that are individually () () () (/) I~mited, but cumulatively considerable ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a protect are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past protects, the effects of other current protects, and the effects of probable future prolects)~ c) Does the protect have environmental effects that () () () (/) will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly Comments. a) The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Exhibit IV-3 Additionally, the area surrounding the site is developed Based on previous development and street improvements, it is unlikely that any endangered or rare species would inhabit the site b) If the proposed protect were approved, then the applicant would be requred to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan The 2001 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build- out in the City and Sphere of Influence The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to aggregate resources, prime farmland, air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and visual resources Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources, however, they would not reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Gwdelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)) These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use projects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required c) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly • 5,Y~3$ Initial Study for DRC2004-00371 AND DRC2004-00402 EARLIER ANALYSES City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 20 Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D) The effects identified above for this protect were within the scope of and adequately analyzed m the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply) (1/) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (/) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #68020115, certified January 4, 1989) 5,~3°I City of Rancho Cucamonga • NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Negative Declaration rs being cnculated for public review m accordance with the Califomra Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code Prolect File No DRC2004-00371 and DRC2004-00402 Public Review Penod Closes: July 14, 2004 Project Name: Prolect Applicant City of Rancho Cucamonga Project Location (also see attached map) Located at the northwest and southwest corners of Victoria Street and East Avenue - APN 0227-061-38, 70, 71, 72, 78 and 81 and 0227-121-38, 39, 40, 44, 45, and 46 Prolect Descnption: A request to change the General Plan and Etnvanda Specific Plan land use designations from Low Residential (2-4 dwelling unts per acre) to Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) for approximately 9 acres of land FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the protect may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following fmdmg: . ® The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the protect may have a significant effect on the environment ^ The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but (1) Revisions in the protect plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the protect as revised may have a significant effect on the environment If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report wdl not be regwred Reasons to support this fmdmg are included m the attached Initial Study The protect file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at 10500 Civic Center Dnve (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review penod Date of Determination Adopted By • ~l~'TO • RESOLUTION NO 04-90 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2004-00371, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR APPROXIMATELY 9 ACRES OF LAND FROM LOW RESIDENTIAL (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), TO VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL (1-2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST AND SOUTHWEST CORNERS OF VICTORIA STREET AND EAST AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN ~ 1 0227-061-38, 70, 71, 72, 78, AND 81 AND 0227-121-38, 39, 40, 44, 45, AND 46 A Rentals 1 The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed a request for General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00371, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subtect amendment is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 14th day of July 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application 3 All legal preregwsites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby speafically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Rentals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on July 14, 2004, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows The application applies to property within the City, and The proposed amendment will not have a significant impact on the environment, and c The proposed amendment is consistent with the land use concept and density provisions of the General Plan 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the speafic findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a The amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for the logical development of the General Plan and with related development, and 3, ~ ( I PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-90 GPA DRC2004-00371-CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA July 14, 2004 Page 2 b The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially incurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity, and The subtect application is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan, and The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends the City Council adopt a Negative Declaration, based upon the findings as follows a That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA gwdelines promulgated thereunder, that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application b The Negative Declaration identifies no significant environmental effect will result if this amendment is approved c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations 5 Based upon the findings and conclusion set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00371 as shown in the attached Exhibit "A," Site Plan The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF JULY 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Rich Macias, Chairman ~~~~a PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-90 GPA DRC2004-00371-CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA July 14, 2004 Page 3 ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of July 2004, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS ~~ J, ~ ~3 GPA DRC2004-00371 ESPA DRC2004-00402 w z w F- ug VICTORIA AVENUE GENERAL PLAN AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT GENERAL PLAN AND SPECIFIC PLAN ® VL 0 L ~~ ILJ _ _ _ _ MAP AMENDMENT AREA ~ ~ ~ L.}. 4 Exhibit ~~A~~ FROM LOW TO VERY LOW 1 vinTnoin nVCAII IG ~ RESOLUTION NO 04-91 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2004-00402, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR APPROXIMATELY 9 ACRES OF LAND FROM LOW RESIDENTIAL (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), TO VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL (1-2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST AND SOUTHWEST CORNERS OF VICTORIA STREET AND EAST AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0227-061-38, 70, 71, 72, 78, AND 81 AND 0227-121-38, 39, 40, 44, 45, ~ AND 46 A Rectals 1 The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed a request for Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment DRC2004-00371, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subtect amendment is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 14th day of July 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application All legal preregwsites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred L B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth m the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on July 14, 2004, including wntten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby speafically finds as follows a The application applies to property within the City, and The proposed amendment will not have a significant impact on the environment, and c The proposed amendment is consistent with the land use concept and density provisions of the Etiwanda Specific Plan 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public heanng and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a The amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the Etiwanda Speafic Plan and will provide for the logical development of the Specific Plan with related development, and S,Y~ ~-5 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-91 ESPA DRC2004-00402-CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA July 14, 2004 Page 2 b The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vianity, and The subject application is consistent with the obtectives of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, and d The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends the City Counal adopt a Negative Declaration, based upon the findings as follows a That the Negatroe Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the Californa Enwronmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder, that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application b The Negative Declaration identifies no significant environmental effect will result if this amendment is approved c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5 of Title 14 of the Califorrna Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considering the record as a whole, the Irntial Study and Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed protect will have potential far an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations 5 Based upon the findings and conclusion set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of Etiwanda Speafic Plan Amendment DRC2004-00402 as shown in the attached Exhibit "A," Site Pian 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF JULY 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~t~ I1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-91 ESPA DRC2004-00402-CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • July 14, 2004 Page 3 BY Rich Macias, Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary 1~ I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of July 2004, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS • S , w, ~~- GPA DRC2004-00371 ESPA DRC2004-00402 w z w ug VICTORIA AVENUE GENERAL PLAN AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT GENERAL PLAN AND SPECIFIC PLAN ® VL 0 L _ MAP AMENDMENT AREA ~~ ~ ~ 0 Exhibit °/~° FROM LOW TO VERY LOW n vlr`TnRIA ~VFNI IF ~ Staff Report DATE July 14, 2004 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, City Planner BY Gail Sanchez, Planning Commission Secretary SUBJECT ELECTION OF PLANNING COMMISSION OFFICERS BACKGROUND The Planning Commission Administrative Regulations provide for election of Chairman and Vice Chairman at the first regular meeting in July of each year RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission should elect a Chairman and Vice Chairman to serve for one-year terms Respectfully submitted, ~/ Bra~,6 City Planner BB GS gs ITEM L Staff Report DATE July 14, 2004 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, City Planner gy Gail Sanchez, Planning Commission Secretary SUBJECT DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS BACKGROUND The Commission normally rewews Design Review Committee membership at least once a year It is now time to review Committee membership Commissioners McPhail and Stewart currently serve on the Committee RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission should determine appropriate membership for the Design Review Committee Respectfully submitted, Brad ler City Planner BB GS gs ITEM M T H E C I T Y O F R A N C n 0 C u C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE July 14, 2004 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, City Planner BY Larry Henderson, Prinapal Planner SUBJECT TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE APPOINTMENT BACKGROUND The current membership of the Trails Committee is shown below The Committee meets once a month, as needed, usually on the second Wednesday of the month at 6 00 p m preceding the regular Planning Commission meeting Member Term Expires Appointment Richard Fletcher July 2005 Planning Commission (2003) Cristine McPhail July 2004 Planning Commission (2003) Patriaa Carlson July 2006 Park & Recreation Commission (2001) Antonio Karraa July 2006 Park & Recreation Commission (2000) Brian Zupke July 2005 Bicycling Member at Large (2001) Laura Jarek July 2005 Equestrian Member at Large (2001) Pam Stewart July 2005 Alternate Planning Commission (1999) Martin Dickey July 2006 Alternate Park & Recreation Commission (2001) Commissioner McPhail's appointment expires this month RECOMMENDATION The Commission should now appoint a member to serve to July 2006 Respectfully submitted, Brad r City Planner BB LH gs ITEM N