Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1998/01/14 - Agenda Packet • • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - ~ HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AGENDA WEDNESDAY JANUARY 14, 1998 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chamber 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Chairman Barker _ Vice Chairman McNiel _ Commissioner Bethel _ Commissioner Maaas _ Commissioner Tolstoy _ II. ANNOUNCEMENTS III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES December 10, 1997 IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items are public hearings in which concerned mdiwduals may voice their opinion of the related protect Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each pro/ect Please sign ~n after speaking A ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MODIFICATION TO LANDMARK ALTERATION PERMIT 96-02 - CAMPOS - A request to demolish four single family residences located at 9618, 9626, 963, and 9642 Foothill Boulevard, and reconstruct with new replica structures - APN 208-153-08, 09, 10, and 11 Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration Related Fde Development Review 93-15 (Continued from December 10, 1997) (TO BE CONTINUED TO FEBRUARY 25, 1998) B HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST DESIGNATION 97-01 - CAMPOS - A request to rescind the Local Histonc Landmark Designation (LD 94-02) and redesignate as a Point of Interest for four single family residences located at 9618, 9626, 963, and 9642 Foothill Boulevard - APN 208-153-08, 09, 10 and 11 Related Files Landmark Alteration Permit 96-02, Development rewew 93-15, and Landmark Designation 94-02 (Continued from December 10, 1997) (TO BE CONTINUED TO FEBRUARY 25, 1998) C ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND LANDMARK ALTERATION PERMIT 97-01 - RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - A request for a phased demolition of approximately 35,268 to 44,298 square feet of budding area of the Ellena/Regina Winery, previously designated as a local histonc landmark (Landmark Designation 88-04), located on the south side of Base Line Road approximately 600 feet west of the intersection of Victoria Park Lane at 12467 Base Lme Road - APN 227-161-24 Staff has prepared a Negatroe Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration (Continued from December 10, 1997) V. PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Comm~ss~on Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda VI. COMMISSION BUSINESS VII. ADJOURNMENT 1, Gail Sanchez, Planning Commission Secretary of the Cdy of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy o(the foregoing agenda was posted on January 8, 1998, at least 72 hours poor to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964 2 at 10500 C~wc Center Dnve, Rancho Cucamonga ~~~ ~ Page 2 • r, • VICINITY MAP ~ .........................~ ~.. ............ ........ 9plr~ d :.: ... ~' 1 ...: IJ ~ F--- 1 -- -- - - --- ~ r"'~ ~~~ I E HdyrN NdbW I ~ i I ' I I ~ 1 Wbon • ~-... I \ r rrn _ r 5 ruin ~ ~ ~ i ~ ` q _ FminAl FfMril ~ MpnWtl Ian Veen PM LaM t Vmra ~ \ S tE pq `9 Buy L+rr Y ~ ' ~3 S / _ `~ 3 ~ ~ ~ .IIO. Y J h.T.l 5 F A R ~ ` ITn ~ J an • Q O ~ $ ay i r * CITY MALL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE January 14, 1998 TO Chairman and Members of the Historic Preservation Commission FROM Brad Buller, City Planner BY Dan Coleman, Principal Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MODIFICATION TO LANDMARK ALTERATION PERMIT 96-02 - CAMPOS - A request to demolish four single family residences, located at 9618, 9626, 9634, and 9642 Foothill Boulevard, and reconstruct them with new replica structures - APN 208-153-08, 09, 10, and 11 Related File Development Review 93-15 HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST DESIGNATION 97-01 - CAMPOS - A request to change the designation from a local historic landmark to a Point of Interest for four single family residences, located at 9618, 9626, 9634, and 9642 Foothill Boulevard - APN 208-153-08, 09, 10, and 11 Related Files Landmark Alteration Permit 96-02, Development Review 93-15, and Landmark Designation 94-02 BACKGROUND These items were continued from the December 10, 1997 agenda, to allow additional time for the applicant to submit revised development plans Staff met with the applicant on November 17, 1997 to discuss their intent to demolish all four structures and increase the leasable square footage in the project Revised development plans have not been submitted as of the writing of this report Staff has unsuccessfully attempted to contact the applicant and her representatives by phone, fax and letter since December 10, 1997 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends continuance of this item to the February 25, 1998 agenda City BB DC mlg ITEM A & B CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - STAFF REPORT DATE January 14, 1998 TO Chairman and Members of the Historic Preservation Commission FROM Brad Buller, City Planner BY Larry Henderson, Pnnapal Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND LANDMARK ALTERATION PERMIT 97-01 -RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - A request for a phased demolition of approximately 35,268 to 44,298 square feet of building area of the Ellena/Regina Winery, previously designated as a local historic landmark (Landmark Designation 88-04), located on the south side of Base Line Road approximately 600 feet west of the intersection of Victoria Park Lane at 12467 Base Line Road -APN 227-161-24 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS This item was tabled at the previous Commission meeting of December 10, 1997 The Commission tabled the application and requested more information on the protect's direction It had been anticipated that the Redevelopment Agency Board would have been able to make additional information available by the current meeting date and therefore this item was publicly advertised The Board subsequently scheduled a toint workshop of the Board and Commission on the subject site on Saturday, January 10 The workshop date is after the publication of this agenda and therefore the substance of this report will be presented orally at the meeting A copy of the previous staff report with attachments is enclosed for reference CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Vallev Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300 foot radius of the project site RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Commission issue a Mitigated Negative Declaration and approve the application subject to the conditions contained in the resolution City BB LH gs Attachments Exhibit "A" -December 10, 1997, Staff Report with attachments Resolution of Approval ITE(1 C CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - STAFF REPORT DATE December 10, 1997 TO Chairman and Members of the Historic Preservation Commission FROM Brad Buller, City Planner BY Larry J Henderson, Principal Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND LANDMARK ALTERATION PERMIT 97-01 -RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - A request for a phased demolition of approximately 35,268 to 44,298 square feet of bwlding area of the Ellena/Regina Winery, previously designated as a local historic landmark (Landmark Designation 88-04), located on the south side of Base Line Road approximately 600 feet west of the intersection of Victoria Park Lane at 12467 Base Line Road -APN 227-161-24 BACKGROUND The Regina Winery was designated a local landmark by the City Council on February 1, 1995, Resolution No 95-013 The Landmark designation had previously been considered in 1988 but the application had been tabled by the City Council after receiving obtections by the previous owner, Nabisco Co The Redevelopment Agency's purchase of the site and subsequent lease to the present tenant, J Filippi Winery, facilitated the current landmark designation status As explained in the attached copy (Exhibit B) of a memorandum dated October 22, 1997, from the Redevelopment Manager, changes to the historic structures are needed in order to comply with the tenant's business plans and City bwlding code requirements Budding Code compliance is necessary in order to start winery making and bottling operations in warehouse bwlding Nos 104 and 105 (Exhibit "A") Because the total building area involved exceeds 15,000 square feet, a fire sprinkler system is required As indicated, the Redevelopment Agency had budgeted $300,000 but bids received in early 1997 ranged from $700 thousand to $1 1 million The present landmark alteration application proposes to demolish in two phases all structures not currently committed by the tenant's lease ANALYSIS A Alteration Description The estimated total bulding areas comprising the historic landmark designated area (Exhibit "A") is 87,285 square feet The total demolition request, if approved and implemented, would eliminate approximately 49 percent (42,668 square feet) of the total landmark designated square footage In descriptive terms, the phase one demolition proposal would eliminate all six of the winery cellar bwldings and the loading dock The phase two (unspecified as to actual timing) demolition would consist of the original Ellena Family house, the distillery, boiler house and stainless steel storage tank Those winery structures outside of the present landmark designation boundary are subtect to removal at the Redevelopment Agency's choosing ~- - - - _ ' /~ C ~ HPC STAFF REPORT LAP 97-01 -RDA December 10, 1997 Page 2 A directly related impact is the potential loss of significant winery artifacts that are currently contained within the main cellars, i e ,the large and diverse collection of redwood wine storage tanks A detailed discussion of all the winery artifacts was contained in a study prepared by Chattel/Melton Assoaates and reviewed by the Historic Preservation Commission previously on November 12, 1997 The retention of the winery artifacts has a strong relationship to the ongoing historic context of the winery and, in the opinion of both the consultant and the tenant, are a benefit to the future of the winery operations as a visitor attraction In addition, the artifacts are a strong educational resource in promoting local history As a condition of approval, it is recommended that an Artifact Retention Plan be prepared and approved by the City Counal Several other conditions are recommended as environmental mitigations B Environmental Assessment An Initial Study and recommended Mitigated Negative Declaration are recommended for certification FACTS FOR FINDING The following Facts for Findings may be made in support of the application Finding The action proposed is consistent with the purposes of this Ordinance Fact The Landmark Alteration will contribute to the long term economic life of the facility by allowing the current winery user to use the remaining portions of the complex . Finding The applicant has demonstrated that denial of the application will result in immediate or substantial hardship Fact Code compliance will result m construction costs of between $700 thousand and $1 1 million, which is far above the $300,000 budgeted for the protect CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300 foot radius of the protect site RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Commission issue a Mitigated Negative Declaration and approve the application subtect to the conditions contained in the resolution Respectf submi ted, Br City Planner BB LJH mlg Attachments Exhibit "A" - Exhibit "B" - Exhibit "C" - Exhibit "D" - Resolution o Site -Phasing Plan • Redevelopment Agency memorandum dated October 22, 1997 Building Photographs Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Approval G 3 Baseline Road 106 102 ~--1 114 107 _. . 103 ^~ tr'lll 118 112 ~ 15 105 Oq 101 109 ~16 110 111 o~--- ^-- D 119 O O i ~. ln~ij _. ~.,z..._.. 120 121 N_ 100 0 100 200 Scale to Feet ~..-,. Lnr~M4f lkb~1h 10\1 --- Property I.tne ->t- Ra37 Spttr Wind Break 112 ~I' I 1 L J ~,ase 1 Devho~i~ioh ~Pl~ase2F ~,~ Demoli lioh Exhtbtt' A" Srte - Phasme_ Plan LA 97-O1 Regina Winery .~ ~.~ ,.tee 9,IEOe ~,.~„p. aersvz . Barr 101 Resbunnt- Wu1e Tssprg Rm fian9uel Fac 1968 1]500 103 Tu9ng ROOm-Natant 1962-1966 a050 10] Hauu 1908-1910 1103 101 Wareeouae-eo0k+rq Ratm 1%e 97a4 105 Wareeause CMIKn aM I~Se - V! a Ceuar 18a0s 13 J3] 108 Celbr No 1 Cons Wine Tanta Vaont 1918 -1936 a 838 103 CeOar No 2 ReEymE Sbrage Tanks 1916 19]8 a 15A 108 Ce9ar NO ] d 4 RethaoC Sbra9e Tanks 1916 -1914 5 B]5 109 Ce9ar No 6 ReW99e Sto aqe Tanks 19x0 -19a] 8 SOl 110 CeOar No 8 ReoMOOC $krage Tanks i940 -194 8 ]59 111 l.OaEVg DOdt 19a0-194 8136 113 Femeneng 8u0evg (Ade porWru) 19]841945 WA 11] Sbmbss SbN $ba9e Tanks 1965 WA lla DuNbry 19aq a]00 115 Bwbr HOUx 1920s 100 118 $bmbe Sbel sbra9a bnk 1981-1982 1 300 113 Pump Hause 18•q WA 116 Crusher 1977 WA 119 Sob House 1950s WA 120 Wan:nouselSMp 1950-1959 WA 121 Sbde 1968 WA 132 Resmar 19304982 WA 13] EuCaypNe VvVnE ereaka 193PS WA IIa Rad Sour 19a0a WA G -~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE October 22, 1997 TO FROM fiECEIYE Brad Buller, City Planner q~,~ Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Manager (./®~T 2 3 1997 BY' Jan Reynolds, Redevelopment Analyst City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division Subfect REGINA WINERY LANDMARK ALTERATION PERMIT The intent of this memorandum is to provide direction to the Planning Division to begin processing a Landmark Alteration Permit for Regina Winery, located at 12467 Base Line Road This process should include appropriate environmental clearance to process this request As background, the Redevelopment Agency purchased Regina Winery and surrounding property in 1993 as an affordable housing protect The entire site is approximately 13 5 acres, zoned High Density Residential At the time of purchase, the Agency's intent was to land bank the property until such time as Housing Setaside Funds were adequate to develop the property as an affordable senior housing site In 1994, the Redevelopment Agency was approached by Mr Gino Filippi with a request to lease a portion of the Winery as a banquet, wine sales/tasting, and bottling faality The Redevelopment Agency Board viewed this as an excellent interim use of the property, and approved an agreement with J Filippi Winery for the lease of defined areas within the main winery structure During the past three years, the tenant has made a number of improvements to their lease space and continues to operate a successful business at Regina Winery Because Agency commitments to other affordable housing protects have pledged Housing Setaside funds for the next 5-7 years, there are no Agency funds available to develop this site Recently, the Agency has been approached by a number of developers with an interest in purchasing the property and as a result, the Agency Board has directed staff to pursue purchasing proposals At this time, staff is discussing options with interested developers C~ ~x~~~~~T „~„ Regina Winery October 22, 1997 Page 2 • During Executive Session on October 1, 1997, as part of the interest to purchase discussion, the Redevelopment Agency reviewed information relative to the improvement protect currently under design for Regina Winery As you may know, the intent of the improvement protect was to provide seismic upgrades, reroofing and fire sprinklers for the facility The Agency had originally authorized bids for this protect in March, 1997 Bids received ranged from $700,000 to $1 1 Million, which exceeded the Agency's allocated budget of $300,000. As a result, all bids were refected in May, 1997. Agency staff has since been working with the structural engineer to modify the plans in an attempt to lower the cost of construction The structural engineer and Building Official have reviewed the plans, and although minor modifications have been achieved, they do not significantly lower the estimated cost of construction According to the City's Building Offiaal the most significant costs are associated with the size of pipe necessary to bring water adequate to fire spnnkler the entire budding, and the difficulty in scaffolding around the redwood tanks The Redevelopment Agency has reaffirmed support for the tenant and wine center use at Regina Winery As evidenced by the attached letter, the tenant ~s • interested in continuing their operation at Regina Winery Given the potential sale of the property, the Agency is concerned that improvements to the existing structures are not economically infeasible for both the City and the tenant Based on Agency discussion of the improvement protect status and preliminary information in the Historic and Cultural Survey, staff has recommended the preservation of the historical and cultural aspects of the structure through photographic documentation Recognizing cultural interest in the redwood tanks, staff has also recommended the preservation of Space 107 and the tanks housed in that area Agency staff will be providing the Agency Board with a preservation/storage plan for the potential reuse of the remaining redwood storage tanks prior to demolition of the structure Due to the expense of demolishing the concrete tanks in Space 106, staff is also recommending preservation of that area The areas to be included in the Landmark Alteration Permit are referenced on the attached layout provided by Chattel-Mellon as Spaces 103, 101 (portion), 102 (portion), 108, 109, 110, 111 (portion), 114, 115, and 116 It is important to note that demolition will occur in two phases The first phase will Spaces 108 through 111 These areas include three of the spaces that currently house the redwood tanks, the shed portion only of the loading dock, and the metal buildings attached to the west wall of the main building Future phases will encompass the old house and portions of the kitchen and former tasting room and out buildings defined as 114 (distillery), 115 (boiler house), and 116 (stainless steel storage tank) Plans for reuse of the area vacated by future demolition will be determined prior to demolition permit for those particular structures C Regina Winery October 22, 1997 Page 3 Currently, the tenant's lease provides for the use of the main complex as retail space and banquet facilities (Space 101), and the warehouse area (Spaces 104 and 105) for wine bottling and storage The winery operation will continue as permitted under Conditional Use Permit 94-25, with no proposed expansion in use Space 102 (former tasting room), and Spaces 106 and 107, are maintained by the Redevelopment Agency Space 102 is temporarily being used as a storage area by City facilities, and as previously indicated the redwood tanks will remain on display in Space 107, as well as the concrete tanks in Space 106 Staff is recommending that the ground area vacated by the demolition be treated with pea gravel The exterior building treatment of the area remaining after demolition will be consistent with the existing building We respectfully request that the Landmark Alteration Permit for Regina Winery be placed on the November 12, 1997, Historic Preservation Commission Agenda If you need further information or have questions regarding this request, please feel free to contact me or Jan Reynolds Enclosures • • • c7 State of California -- The Resources Agency Primary X DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI X _ SKETCH MAP Trinomial ~ge 4 of 19 `Resource Name or # Reolna `VlflelY Drawn By Robert Chattel •Date of Map 07/28/1997 114 .: 117 112 113 n ~ lE 1 L3 ~19 Bas<Lne Road 106 - 102 107 103 105 OJ 101 109 110 i_ o ~ 120 o O O 121 122 Phase ~ _~~ hhaSe II _-_-~ / 100 0 100 200 Scile m Fce[ - - Praperry Lrne /-..- Ra~7 Spur t t) t Wind Rreal- \umbzr Vamt Date of Construcuon 101 10? and 10-3 Main Compl~~ 196?-1963 103 105-III blam Complex 1916-19JOs II? Femncnung Budding 1938-19ai 113 Stmnless Stncl Storagz TanFs (3) 196-193 IIJ Daullen 19-10 II) BodcrHoust 19?0 116 Stamltss Smzl Storage TanA 1981-1983 117 Pump Houst 1910s 113 Crushzr 1977 119 Scalz Housz 1950s I?0 Warehouse/Shop 1950-1959 I?1 Stable 1966 I?? Rcservou 1970s-193? I?3 Eucal~pcu51V1nd BreaFs 1930s I2J Rad Spur 19J0~ G~ -" 523 ~ ~ i X951 ' Peowred In'o ma,ion ~~~ w • ~ ~~ ~r~~~ I ~ /' l/ ~, ~~/ i~ f~~~~l~~~ll~~ y FOURTH-GENERATION CUCAMONGA VALLEY VINTNERS BONDED WINERY CA-3T24 7 WINEGROWERS SIIVCE 1922 r Joseph filippi Premium Reserve Wines r Joseph Flippi Reserve Sherry & Port Wines r Chateau fihppi ChoKe Table Wines e Guasti Altar Wines r Cucamonga Cooler Wme Spntzers October 2nd 1997 City of Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency Linda D. Daniels, Manager 10500 Civic Center Drive Post Office Box 807 : Rancho Cucamonga, Califomta 91729-0807 Dear Linda RANCHO CUCAMONGA ADDRESS 12467 Bose line Road ' _ Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 TELEPHONE 409.899.5755 FAC~MQBQ1~4iBJB2~ D RANCHO CaCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENTAGENL^/ OCT 1'~ 1997 191IDtll11Zt1121gt4t5P6 In the interest of furthering negoaauons that would provide a feasible working solution to some of the problems surrounding preservation of the Regina Winery site, Joseph Filippr Winery supports the RDA's suggested'Landmark Alteration Permit' and encourages the phased demolition of specific bwlding areas as follows a) Cellar areas 5, 6 & 7 and thei adloimng metal bmldmgs b) Old truck dock shed area roof structure c) Interior of old lab area as well the section of bmldings that span between the banquet room area on phase I and wazehouse azea space #1 (including pomons of ofd lutchen, house and former tasnng room) It is our intention to work and continue the diligent efforts for thrs preservazion and suppott constructive provisions to allow for rc Please don't hesitate tin calling if there are any questions Thank you Sincerely, ~~~~ ~ o L F~hpp~ ice President L u cc Dale Frisby, Pete Pitass~ CHATTEL CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION/ MELLON & ASSOCIATES L !J ~~ BvW W4 ,o, Il~,- e ~ ;~ ~ ,P j `-1u ~ uo /~__ ui~ ~ ~i...i.F S'~ u ~ ~„ r1 I-I ~"1 - i - _ ~ ~ im o iro L% III ~ _ ~ n„...~IwA w i.. REGINA WINERY tt C ~ D PAGE IX-1 -x~llo;t `'C REDEVELOPDIENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM1IONGA Plate 1 Vie~~ from northeast looking southwest at 101-111 Mam Complex at Baseline Road frontage CHATTEL CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION/ REDEVELOPDIENT AGENCY OF THE MELLON & ASSOCIATES CITY OF RANCHO CUCAbIO`GA • Plate 2 Viet from northeast loohmg southwest at 102--Tasting Room REGINA WINERY ~~ ~ hm ~a~ /~u ~ m /'~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ Qu uu /"_ __ u' ~ ~:.V.>_~_~ w i Ia ~i,= ~~ 8rein I ~ ~ _~~~A... ~I1 PAGE IX-2 CHATTEL CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION/ REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE MELLON & ASSOCLITES CIT1 OF RANCHO CUCAbIONGA C-`. Plate 3 \~ie~~ from southeast looking northwest at 101--Restaurant, 104--~Varehouse m background on left and ] 02- -Tasting Room m background on nght 8~~~lu RAJ im ~0p is ` ~u~ 1 A ~„ ~ I ~m ~o~ , ~ ~w ~~~ m ~TU ~'Qm ~.._,~ - ~,.. ,. __ _~~_.~._ REGIyA WINERI ~ ~~ PAGE IX-3 CHATTEL CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION/ REDE~'ELOP~IENT AGENCY OF THE AIELLON & ASSOCL4TES CITY OF R.4\CHO CUCA3IONGA Plate 4 Vie~~ from northeast looking south~~~est at Baseline Road frontage, 103--Residence at center, 102--Tasting Room on left 104--Warehouse and 105--Warehouse on nght ~~ ~ ~~ ~o~ ~ ~ ~~ ~a> u n ~L' L I~Q, 101 ~ ' `~ ° i-'~ ,~, I ~ ,,, ~_~ ~~ ~ ~ `-- ~ ~,. I~ ~~„ -~- I _ I '~ ^ ~_~ l_ I i REGINA WI\ERY ~ t 3 YAGE IX-4 CHATTEL CONSTRUCTION CORPOR4TI0\/ REDE~"ELOPi`IENT AGENCS' OF THE 1VIELLON & ASSOCIATES CIT1 OF RANCHO CUCADIONGA • Plate ~ \ iz~~ from northeast looking south«est at ]O~--Warehouse on lefr and 106--Cellar ml on nght, 114-- Disuller~ ~n background on nght B~~~b~ P W IU IC j ' ~y l- ~ Ip~ I0l T' I I ~ Ill I. i IIM 101 `IL ~ IU 1 IW ~ l -~' QI{ ~ 110 '.~...__.~ / 1 III ~ ~~~~~~J-~ CIU ~ ~ 0119 i IA ( 'Ill ~1 ~ _ o~ _~~ Hl ~Strne t Rd S~ Il: ~~` - ~.L. M~{b..t REGINA ~VI\ER1 ~'~ PAGE I~-~ CHATTEL CONSTRUCTION CORPOR~TIO\/ REDE~'ELOP~IENT AGE\CT OF THE MELLON & ASSOCIATES CIT1 OF RANCHO CUCAAIONGA u Plate 6 \~ ie~~ from northeast lookin, south~~est at 114--Distillery from vineyard north of Baseline Road. 106--Cellar =l on left BY~W RAJ IM IP rnn` ~1 ~ IT 1'1i, 1C) 101 1 IIII 10 ,~ Qu I uo ____IJ m ~U I IA (~ 11) 1:: ~ f RY131~ L • REGI\A ~~~I\ER1' C.. / ~/ PAGE I\-6 CHATTEL CONSTRUCTION CORPOR~TIO\/ REDE~'ELOPDIENT AGENCY OF THE MELLON & ASSOCIATES CITY OF RANCHO CUCAbIONGA Plate 7 V~e~~ from south~~est lookm~ northeast at 114--Distillery B ~ In lo: t~l Im lal ~,,,,Il IL i II% 101 ~L+ ~ lT ~ Iw L / ~llJ ( Ilo F _ _ _ 111 ~ ~ ~~~i~~~~ IIJ Ous ~ 1 p (^'If) _ Icn~,__m 111 ~ _ a.u sr~ Mw ~m.a REGINA WINERY ~ ~ ~ PAGE IX-7 CHATTEL CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION/ REDE~'ELOPDIENT AGENCY OF THE MELLON & ASSOCIATES CITY OF RANCHO CUC4AI0\GA r \:=. I Plate 8 ~~ie~~ fiom southeast lookma north~tiest at ll~--Botler House A lol Itl ~~ Ill © i 'q IIM 101 ~ / ~4 ~ 4. ll, ~ ~ .---- ~ , -m I - x.osp i i`~ J - ~ w..i REGI\A Rl[\ERY ~ ~ *7 PAGE IX-8 CHATTEL CONSTRUCTION CORPOR4TION/ REDE~'ELOPAIENT AGENCY OF THE A'IELLON & ASSOCL4TES CITY OF RANCHO CUCADIONGA r ~J Plate 9 ~1 ie~~ from southeast lool.mg north«est at 116--Stainless Steel Storage Tank, 112--FerntenUng Bwldtng m background on Izfr 11 ~--Boiler House to background on rtght Ba.`. P.N B ~ IK ~ to ~ IT _ IO) ` Il~1. •IT ICI lu l ~ ~ ~ .-___i ~ IW ~ 1., 10111 ~' 1 ~ ~1, ,~ r,la - ~ - I REGI\A ~VI\ERl' ~ ~ p PAGE 1~-9 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Orv~sron (909) 477-2750 E~ 0,1 J 1~1~ c ~oc~a a ~~ `~a~~~9~°;,~s`°° G~~~ Q~2 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (Part I -Initial Study) The purpose of this f' rm is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City policies, ordinances, and guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full. GENERAL INFORMATION: INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED Please note that rt Is the rnsponslbitlty o/the applicant to ensum that the application Is complete at the hme o/submittal, C/ty sta// will not 6e avaitable to peAorm worfc regwred to provide m/ssng m/orrnahon Appllcat/on Number for the protect to which th/s form pertains LANDMARK ALTERATION PERMIT (LA) 97-O1 A request for a phased demolition of approximately 35,268 to 44,298 square feet of building area of the Ellena/Regina Winery, previously designated as local historic landmark (LD 88- Pro/ect Title _04) Name 8 Address o/ pro/ecl owner(s) Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency Name 8 Address o/developer orpro/ecf sponsor Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, 10500 Cwic Center Dr , Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Contact Person 8 Address Linda Daniels, Redevelopment Manager - (Address same as above) Telephone Number (909) 477-2700 Ext 2150 Name 8 Address of person prepanng this /orm (If diNerent Irom above) Telephone Number ~~G ~v J C~ L • LA97011S WPD Page 1 of 10 Information md~cated by astensk (') is not required ofnon-construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff '1) Prowde a lull scale (8-1/2 x 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the protect site, and indicate the site boundanes 2) Provide a set o/color photographs which show representative wews into the site from the north, south, east and west, views into and from the site /rom the pnmary access points which serve the site, and repn=sentat~ve views of s~gmricant features from the site Include a map showing location oI each photograph 3) Protect Location (descnbe) Located on the south side of Base Llne Road approximately 600 feet west of the intersection of V~ctona Park Lane at 12467 Base Llne Road 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers (attach additional sheet if necessary) 227-161-24 'S) Gross Site Area (adsq h) 13 5 Acres '6) Net Site Area (total site size minus area of public streets 8 proposed dedications) 3 5 Acres (Area of Designation) 7) Descnbe any proposed genet/plan amendment orzone change which would affect the pro/ect site (attach additional sheet if necessary N/A 8) Include a description of all permits which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies in order to fully implement the protect Landmark Alteration and Demolition Permit from Rancho Cucamonga and Demolition Renovation Noti(cabon by the South Coast Air Quality management District • LA97011S WPD ~ ~C 1 Page 2 of 10 9) Descnbe the physical setting o/the site as d exists before the pmfecf ~ncludmg information on topog2phy, sotl stabddy, plants and animals, mature trees, tratls and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects Descnbe any exrshng structures on site (including age and cond~t~on) and the use of the structures Attach photographs of srgn~ficant features described In add~t~on, site all souroes of mformat~on (i a ,geological and/or hydrologic studies, b~ot~c and amheolog~cal surveys, trafTc studies) See previously submitted Califom~a, Department o/Parks and Recreation DPR 523A Forms, completed by Chattel Construcf~on Corp /Melton 8 Assoc s on 7!28/97 10) Describe the known cultural and/or h~stoncal aspects o/the site Site all sources of ~nlormat~on (books, published reports and oral history) Same as Above 11) Describe any nose sources and the~rleve/s that now af/ect the site (a~roraft, roadway nose, etc) and how they will affect proposed uses The only known significant noise source ~s tratrc associated with the adjacent Base Line Road The proposed changes are intended to accommodate a nonres~denhal use (Winery associated uses) and therefore will not I~kely have an effect LA97011S WPD ~ ~' Page 3 of 10 • 12) Descnbe the proposed protect in detail This should provide an adequate descnptron of the site in terms of ultimate use which wdl result from the pursed protect lnd~cate rf then: are proposed phases /or development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion o(each increment Attach additional sheet(s) i/necessary See attached copy of Redevelopment Manager memorandum dated October 22, 1997 for a complete pro/ect descnptron • 13) Descnbe the surrounding properties, including in/ormation on plants and animals and any cu/tuml, histonca/, or scenic aspects Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc ), intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc) and scale oedevelopment (height, Irontage, setback, rear yard, etc ) A mafonty o/the surrounding uses includes vacant land which in the past was associated with grape vine production To the east there are !wo existing single /amity residences and to the north east a neighborhood shopping center 14) Will the proposed protect change the pattern, scale or character of the surrounding general area of the prolecty The budding mass wdl be significantly altered However the pubOc view o/the site wdl not be sgni(cant/y altered since a ma/onty o/the budding area adjacent to Base Lme Road wdl be retained .15) Indicate the type of short-term and long-term noise to 6e generated, including source and amount How wdl these noise levels aflect adfacent properties and on-site uses What methods of sound proofing are proposed LA97011S WPD `-' ~~ Page 4 of 10 Only shoR term noise impacts should 6e expenenced dunng the demolition penod The hours o/ demolition equipment • operation are limited by City Ordinances and themfore should not be adverse '16) Indicate proposed removals and/or roplacements of mature or scenic trees None proposed at this hme 17) Indicate any bodies o/water (mclud~ng domestic water supplies) into which the site drams Ultimately drainage /rom the site makes its way to the Deer Creek Channel and the Santa Ana River 18) Indicate expected amount of water usage (See Attachment A (or usage estimates) For /urther clanfication, please contact • the Cucamonga County Water Distnct at 987-2591 a Residential (gal/day) Peak use (gaUDay) b CommeroiaUlnd (gal/day/ac) N/A Peak use (gal/min/ac) 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal Septic Tank Sewer If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests If discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation (See Attachment A for usage estimates) For/urtherclanficalion, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Distnct at 987-2591 a b Residenhal (gal/day) Commen;ial/Ind (gal/day/ac) No changes proposed at this time RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS 20) Number o1 residenbal unds Detached (indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size N/A Attached (indicate whether units are rental or /or sale units) N/A LA970115 WPD ~ ~~ Page 5 of 10 21) Anhapated range o/sale pnces and/or rents Sale Pnce(s) $ to $ Rent(permonth) $ to 22) Spea/y number o/bedrooms 6y unit type N/A 23) Indicate anbc~pated household size by unit type N/A 24) Indicate the expected number o/ school children who wdl be residing w~thm the pro/ect Contact the appropnate School Distncts as shown in Attachment B a Elementary b Junior High c Senior High COMMERCIAL. INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Descnbe type of use(s) and ma/orfunct~on(s) oI commercial, ~ndustnal ormst~tutional uses Existing uses will not change The Demolition involves poR~ons o/the bwldmg that have been vacant for approximately /our years 26) Total /loor area oI commercal, mdustnal, or msbtubonal uses by type N/A 27) Indicate hours o/operation NA 28) Numberofemployees Total NA _ LA970115 WPD ~ ~ Page 6 of 10 Maxrmum Shin Time of Maxrmum Shift 29) Provide breakdown o/anticipatedlob c/assificahons, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an indication o/the rate o/hire for each classi(cation (attach additional sheet if necessary) N/A 30) Estimation o/the number o/workers to be hued that currently reside m the Crty N/A '31) For commeroial and industrial uses only, indicate the source, type and amount o/air pollution emissions (Data snould be venried through the South Coast Air Quality Management District, at (818) 572-6283) N/A ALL 32) PROJECTS Have the water, sewer, fin;, and flood control agencies serving the protect been contacted to determine their ability to provide adequate service to the proposed pro/ect~ Il so, please indicate their response N/A 33) In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic mafenals~ Examples o/hazardous and/ortoxic matenals include, but are not limited fo PCB's, radioactive substances, pesticides and herbicides, fuels, oils, solvents, and other flammable liquids and gases Also note underground storage of any o/the above Please list the matenals and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates o(use, i/ known None LA970115 WPD ~ ~ Page 7 of 10 34) Will the proposed protect involve the temporary orlong-term use, storage or discharge o/hazardous and/ortoxic materials, including but not I~m~ted to those examples listed above If yes, prowde an inventory o/all such materials to be used and proposed method of disposal The location o(such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans None I hereby certi/y that the statements /um~shed above and m the attached exhibits present the data and mformat~on required /or adequate evaluation of this protect to the best of my ability, that the !acts, statements, and rn/ormat~on presented are true and correct tot he best o/ my knowledge and belie/ I further understand that add~honal m/ormahon maybe required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City o/Rancho Cucamonga , Date November 13, 1997 Signature u ~1 ~ ~xk~ Tale RDA Manager i LA97011S WPD `^ ~ Page 8 of 10 ATTACHMENT A Water Usaae Average use per day Residential Single Family 600 gal/day Apt/Condo 400 gal/day Commercialllndustrial General and Regional Commercial 3000 gal/day/ac Neighborhood Commercial 1500 gal/daylac General Industrial 1500 gal/day/ac Industrial Park 3000 gal/day/ac Peak Usage For all uses Average use x 2 0 Sewer Flows Residential Single Family 270 gal/day ApUCondos 200 gal/day Commercial/Industrial General Commercial 2000 gal/day/ac Neighborhood Commercial 100-1500 gal/day/ac General Industrial 2000 gal/day/ac Heavy Industrial 3000 gal/day/ac Source Cucamonga County Water District Master Plan, 9/86 • 1.A970115 WPD `-'' ~~ Page 9 of 10 • ATTACHMENT B Contact the school district for your area for amount and payment of school fees Elementary School Distracts Alta Loma 9350 Base Line Road, Suite F Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)987-0766 Central 10601 Church Street, Suite 112 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)989-8541 Cucamonga 8776 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)987-8942 Etiwanda 5959 East Avenue P O Box 248 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 (909)899-2451 High School Chaffey High School 211 West 5th Street Ontano, CA 91762 (909)988-8511 t.A970115 WPD ~ ~ Page 10 of 10 City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1. Project File: LANDMARK ALTERATION PERMIT 97-01 2. Related Files: LANDMARK DESIGNATION 88-04 3. Description of Project A request for a phased demolition of approximately 35,268 to 44,298 square feet of building area of the Ellena/Regina Winery, previously designated as local historic landmark 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency 10550 Crvic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga CA 91729 5. General Plan Designation: High Density Residential . 6. Zoning. Victoria Community Plan -High Density 7 Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: A majority of the surrounding uses includes vacant land which in the past was assoaated with grape vine production To the east there are two existing single family residences and to the north east a neighborhood shopping center 8 Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planrnng Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Larry Henderson, Principal Planner (909) 477-2750 Ext 2253 10. Other agencies whose approval is required None ~1 LJ G ~J Initial Study for Clty of Rancho Cucamonga LD 97-01 (REGINA WINERY) Page 2 • • • The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this pro)ect, Involving at least one Impact that Is "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as Indicated by the checklist on the following pages ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED ()Land Use and Planning ()Transportation/Circulation ()Public Services OPopulation and Housing OBiological Resources O Utilities and Service Systems ()Geological Problems ()Energy and Mineral Resources ()Aesthetics ()Water ()Hazards (X) Cultural Resources O Au Quality ONoise ORecreation ()Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this Initial evaluation () I find that the proposed pro)ect COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared (X) I find that although the proposed pro)ect could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect In this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the pro)ect, or agreed to, by the applicant A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION well be prepared () I find that the proposed pro)ect MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required () i find that the proposed pro)ect MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based upon the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect Is a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated " An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed () I find that although the proposed pro)ect could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect In this case because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, Including revisions or mitigation measures tJhat are imposed upon the proposed pro)ect Signed ~ rry Henderson Principal Planner November 5, 1997 C 3a Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga LD 97-01 (REGINA WINERY) Page 3 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act Gwdelines, an explanation is regwred for all "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," and "Less Than Significant Impact" answers, including a discussion of ways to mitigate the significant effects identified PotsnWlty $pndicanl Impact Less lasuas erM SappoM1mg IMarmatam Swans Potentally Unbaa Thin SgnR~ranl Miligatron 59ndraM No 1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal a) Conflict with general plan designation or zonings () () () (X) b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or polices adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the projects () () () (X) c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the viandy~ O O O (X) d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community () () () (X) Comments: a) b) c) d) PotMUelly $pnRirant Impact Less Issuas and Supporting Inlonnalion Swrces Polenimly Unleaa Than SignRranl MiligaUOn SipnRranl No 2 POPULATION AND HOUSING Would the proposal a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections O O O (X) b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly (e g ,through projects m an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure) () () () (X) c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable housings () () () (X) Comments: • • C31 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga LD 97-01 (REGINA WINERY) Paqe 4 a) b) c) Potenlally Spn~(cent Issues en0 SupPOning Informatron Sources ImpaU Less Potentially Unless Then $1OnlflCanl Mrtigebon r $gnRCant No 3. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts ~nvolwng a) Fault ruptures () () () (X) b) Seismic ground shakings () () () (X) c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefactions () () () (X) d) Seiche hazards () () () (X) e) Landslides or mudflows~ () () () (X) f) Erosion, changes in topography, or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading, or filly () () () (X) g) Subsidence of the lands () () () (X) h) Expansive soils () () () (X) i) Unique geologic or physical features () () () (X) Comments a) b) c) d) e) 9) h) C Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga LD 97-01 (REGINA WINERY) Page 5 PotanLally SpnRKant Impact Less Issues anC SuPponing In/ortnation Sowces Potentially $ipnRrant Unless MM1pation Tien Spndrant No 4. WATER. Will the proposal result rn a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoffs () ( ) () (X) b) Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding () ( ) () (X) c) Discharge mto surface water or other alteration of surface water quality (e g ,temperature, dissolved oxygen, or turbidity) () ( ) () (X) d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body () ( ) () (X) e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements () ( ) () (X) f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations, or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capabtlity~ () () () (X) g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater () () () (X) h) Impacts to groundwater quality () () () (X) Q Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater otherwise avatlable for public water supplies () () () (X) Comments: a) b) c) d) e) 9) h) C 33 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga LD 97-01 (REGINA WINERY) Page 6 \_J Polanlialty $ignrticanl Impact Lssa Issues arM Suppomng IMOrmatron Sources Potentially Unless Than $ignCOanl m Mnigatron $ignRcant No 5. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or protected air quality violations () () () (X) b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants () () () (X) c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or cause any change in climates () () () (X) d) Create objectionable odors () () () (X) Comments: • a) b) c) d) Potentally $igndwrn Impap Less Issues and $upponinq In/ormaoon Sources Potanlialty Unless Tnan $pnAwant Mnigatwn $pnRwanl NO 6 TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the prop osal result rn a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestions () () () (X) b) Hazards to safety from design features (e g , sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e g ,farm equipment) () () () (X) c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses () () () (X) d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-sites () () () (X) e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicychsts~ O O O (X) f) Conflicts with adopted pollees supporting alternative transportation (e g ,bus turnouts, bicycle racks) () () () (X) g) Rail or air traffic impacts O O O (X) Comments• C 3~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga LD 97-01 (REGINA WINERY) Page 7 a) b) c) d) e) 9) Polmlwlly $gneimnl Impap Leu Issues ana SupporWglnlortna0on Sources Potenbaly Unbas Tian SignAwnl Mrtpatwn n SpnAicanl No 7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result ~n impacts to a) Endangered, threatened, or rare speaes or their habitats (including, but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds) () () () (X) b) Locally designated speaes (e g ,heritage trees, eucalyptus windrow, etc )~ () () () (X) c) Locally designated natural communities (e g , eucalyptus grove, sage scrub habitat, etc )~ () () () (X) d) Wetland habitat (e g ,marsh, riparian, and vernal pooi)~ () () () (X) e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors () () () (X) Comments. a) b) c) d) e) • • C `35 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga LD 97-01 (REGINA WINERY) Page 8 Potenoeiry spnAiunl Impetl leas bsues antl $upponinq Inlormetan Sources Polenpairy Unless Than $ignRiranl M~ligalion $pnRranl No 8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans () () () (X) b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and inefficient manners () () () (X) c) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the States () () () (X) Comments: a) b) c) Patenlially signAiranl Impdtl Less Issues and $upppNrq Inlormatgn $ourms Polenealty $ignAranl Unless MM1igalan Than $pnRirant No 9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation) () () () (X) b) Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation piano () () () (X) c) The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazards () () () (X) d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards () () () (X) e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable brush, grass, or trees () () () (X) Com ments. a) b) C. ~~° Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga LD 97-01 (REGINA WINERY) Page 9 c) d) e) Petenlially SpnRrant Impact Less POlenaally Unless Than Issues anE SupPOnmg Inlormetan Sources Sign~ftam M~IigaLOn Spndpam No Im aC Inm orates Im ad Im atl 10. NOISE. Will the proposal result ~n a) Increases in existing noise levels () () () (X) b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels () () () (X) Comments a) b) Polenlially $ign~nanl Impale Less Polanaally Unless Tftan Issues and Supposing Inlartnalion Sources Signdrant Mnipauon SignAwnl Na Im an Into raleE Im ac! Im as 11 PUBLIC SERVICES Would the proposal have an effect upon or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas a) Fire protection b) Police protection c) Schools d) Maintenance of public faalities, including roads e) Other governmental services Comments• a) b) c) d) e) O O O (X) O O O (X) C 37 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga LD 97-01 (REGINA WINERY) Page 10 • • Potentially Sgndrcant Impact Less Issues end SuppoNng Inlormatmn Sources PolanUaliy Unless Tnan SignRwm m Mitigation SignRCant No 12 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies or substantial alterations to the following utdi6es a) Power or natural gasp () () () (X) b) Communication systems () () () (X) c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution faalities~ () () () (X) d) Sewer or septic tanks () () () (X) e) Storm water drainages () () () (X) f) Solid waste disposals () () () (X) g) Local or regional water supplies O O O (X) Comments• a) b) c) d) e) 9) Potentially SgnRx;ant Impact Leas Issues an0 Supponmg Information Sources PolanWlly Sign?wm Unless Mngalion Tftan SignR¢ant No m In r m 13 AESTHETICS. Would the proposal a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highways () () () (X) b) Have a demonstrable negatwe aesthetic effect c) Create light or glare Comments. U O O (X) C 3S Initial Studv for WI City of Rancho Cucam Par a) b) c) Potentially SpnRUanl Impact Lesa laauea end Supponm9lMOrmetwn Sauces Potentialy SpnRrant Unless Mepatian n r Than SignRrant No 14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal a) Disturb paleontological resources b) Disturb archaeological resources c) Affect historical or cultural resources d) Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values e) Restnct existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area Comments• a) b) O O U (X) O O O (X) c) SEE ATTACHMENT EXHIBIT "A" FOR COMMENTS AND MITIGATION d) e) Po1MNlly SpnAUant Impact Less lasuea antl Suppanmg IMOnnaoan Swrces Potentially Spndcant Unless Mnigatmn Than SignArant No 15. RECREATION. Would the proposal a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities ( ) b) Affect existing recreational opportunities ( ) Comments. a) b) () () (X) O O (X) • C 3~ Initial Studv for City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 12 i Potam~aty SignAitenl Impact Less Issues arW Supportmq In/amatwn Sources Potengalh/ Unlass T1ian SgnRrant MsiBalion SgnRwanl No 16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Potential to degrade: Does the protect have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory () () () (X) b) Short term: Does the protect have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs m a relatively brief, definitive penod of time Long-term impacts will endure well into the future) () () () (X) • c) Cumulative Does the protect have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a protect are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past protects, the effects of other current protects, and the effects of probable future protects) () () () (X) d) Substantial adverse: Does the protect have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly () () () (X) Comments a) b) c) d) EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, ~, ~ D Initial Study for Clty of Rancho Cucamonga LD 97-01 (REGINA WINERY) Page 13 one or more effects have been adequately analyzed to an earner EIR or Negative Declaration per • Section 15063(c)(3)(D) The effects identified above for this protect were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earner document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysts The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Ctvtc Center Drive (check all that apply) () General Plan EIR (Certified April 6, 1981) () Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) () Industrial Area Specific Plan EIR (Certified September 19, 1981) () Industrial Area Specific Plan, Subarea 18, EIR (SCH #93102055, certified June 15, 1994) () Victoria Planned Community EIR (Certified May 20, 1981) () Terra Vista Planned Community EIR (SCH #81082808, certified February 16, 1983) () Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan EIR (SCH #87021615, certified September 16, 1987) () Etiwanda Specific Plan EIR (SCH #82061801, certified July 6, 1983) () Etiwanda North Specific Plan EIR (SCH #89012314, certified April 1, 1992) (X) Other Historical Assessment and Artifacts Inventory of the Euena Brothers/Regina Grape Products Co (Regina Winery), completed by Chattel Construction Corp /Melton & Assoc s October 1997 () Other APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the protect described in this Initial Study I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures Further, I have revised the protect plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur Signature ~ ~~;~Z~ Date Print Name and Title Linda Daniels, RDA Manager ~ ~l initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga LD 97-01 (REGINA WINERY) Page 14 • EXHIBIT A -ENVIRONMENTAL COMMENTS AND MITIGATIONS CULTURAL RESOURCES 14 (C) Affect historical or cultural resources Discussion - On February 1, 1995 the Rancho Cucamonga City Councl designated a portion of the Regina/Ellena Brothers Winery a local Historic landmark According to a detailed study completed by the Redevelopment Agency Consultant - Chattel Mellon Associates, the Complex does not possess suffiaent architectural integrity to warrant a National Register level of importance at this time The Consultant's report does indicate that the Winery primary significance rests with the period of 1949 to 1971 Landmark alteration application proposes to retain most of the bwidings from this significant period Notwithstanding the Consultant's report, the local landmark designation does not follow the same criteria as the National Register criteria and therefore the proposed demolition will have an adverse impact on the Complex The mitigations contained herein are intended to mitigate these impacts and together with the rehabilitation of the remaining structures and a substantial retention and display of the artifacts will attain a level of insignificance These actions taken m total will act to promote the continued use of the Winery complex and promote the knowledge and understanding of the Vineculture history of the area Mitigations - 1 Exterior modifications and repairs shall be regwred to be of in kind materials, colors, and • textures 2 Prior to demolition, an Historic Amencan Bwldmg Survey/Historic Amencan Engmeenng Record (NABS/HAER) shall be completed and submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Archives and History Center 3 Prior to Demotion of the Phase One structures, an Artifacts Retention Plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Rancho Cucamonga City Council The Artifacts Retention Plan shall determine the disposition of all the items in areas to be demolished and identified by the Artifacts Survey 4 Installation of a standard City Landmark Plaque prior to phase two demolition 5 Approval of an overall site master plan by the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) prior to commencing Phase Two demolition The Site Master Plan shall be conceptual in nature but shall include such features as an illustrative landscape design, interpretive history elements, and an overall land use plan New development shall be designed with architectural elements that are sympathetic to the viniculture history of the site C ~~ City of Rancho Cucamonga • NEGATIVE DECLARATION The /ollowing Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review !n accordance with the Cali/ornia Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: Landmark Alteration Permd 97-01 Public Review Period Closes: January 14, 1998 Project Name: Ellena/Regina Winery Project Applicant: City of Rancho Cucamonga Project Location (also see attached map)• Located on the south side of Base Line Road approwmately 600 feet west of the intersection of vctona Park Lane at 12467 Base Line Road - APN 227-161-24 PrOjeCt D@SCfiPtiOrt: A request for a phased demol~hon of approwmately 35,268 to 44,298 square feet of bwldmg area of the Ellena/Regina Winery, previously designated as a local histonc landmark (Landmark Designation 88-04) FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine "d the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is . proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: ~ The Initial Study shows that there is no substanbal evidence that the protect may have a significant effect on the environment ® The In~hal Study identified potentially significant effects but (1) Revisions m the protect plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed NegaWe Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or m~6gate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substanbal evidence before the agency that the protect as revised may have a significant effect on the environment ff adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report wdl not be required. Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached Initial Study. The protect fde and all related documents are available for review at the Crty of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration dunng the review penod. January 14.1998 Date of Determination Adopted By Cy3 RESOLUTION NO 98-01 A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING LANDMARK ALTERATION PERMIT 97-01 FOR THE REGINA WINERY, LOCATED AT 12476 BASE LINE ROAD - APN 227-161-24 WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has held a duly advertised public hearing to consider all available comments on the proposed Landmark Alteration Permit WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has received and reviewed all available input regarding said Landmark Alteration Permit WHEREAS, all legal preregwsites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred NOW, THEREFORE, the Historic Preservation Commission hereby speafically finds, determines, and resolves as follows SECTION I The application applies to the bwidings located at Assessor's Parcel Number 227-161-24 SECTION II The proposed Landmark Alteration meets the following criteria established m Chapter 22 24 120 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code • FINDING The action proposed is consistent with the purposes of this Ordinance FACT The Landmark Alteration Permit will contribute to the long term economic life of the facility by allovnng the current winery user to use the remaining portions of the complex FINDING The applicant has demonstrated that denial of the application will result m immediate or substantial hardship FACT Code compliance vnll result in construction costs of between $700 thousand and $1 1 million, which is far above the $300,000 budgeted for the Pro/ect SECTION III A Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared and certified for this Landmark Alteration Permit and the mitigation measures have been included as conditions of approval for this Resolution SECTION IV Based on the substantial evidence reviewed by this Commission and based on the findings set forth above, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation Commission does approve Landmark Alteration Permit 97-01 for alterations to the Regina Winery as described in the staff report dated December 10, 1997, with the following conditions Exterior modifications and repairs shall be required to be of in-kind materials, colors, and textures . 2 Prior to demolition, an Historic American Bwlding Survey/Historic American Engineering Record (HABS/HAER) shall be completed and submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Archives and History Center c y ~' HPC RESOLUTION NO 98-01 LAP 97-01 -RDA January 14, 1998 Page 2 3 Pnor to demotion of the Phase One structures, an Artifacts Retention Plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Rancho Cucamonga City Council The Artifacts Retention Plan shall determine the disposition of all the items in areas to be demolished and identdied by the Artifacts Survey 4 Installation of a standard City Landmark Plaque, prior to phase two demolition 5 Approval of an overall Site Master Plan by the Historic Preservation Commission, pnor to commenting Phase Two demolition The Site Master Plan shall be conceptual m nature but shall include such features as an illustrative landscape design, interpretive history elements, and an overall land use plan 6 New development shall be designed with architectural elements that are sympathetic to the viniculture history of the site APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF JANUARY 1998 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY E David Barker, Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Histonc Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission held on the 14th day of January 1998, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS C