HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007/03/07 - Agenda PacketTHE CITY OF RANCHO CITCAMONGA
10500 Civic Center Drive ~ Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730-3801
~GENT~AS
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
CITY COUNCIL
l~I.f~tiLAR 1!'II;ETIN(:S
15t and 3`d Wednesdays ~ 7:00 P.M.
MARCH. 7, 2007
1vlr~tiz~3F its
MAYOR
MAYOR PRO TEM
COUNCIL MEMBERS
Donald J. Kurth, M.D.
Diane Williams
Rex Gutierrez
L. Dennis Michael
Sam Spagnolo
CITY MANAGER
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY CLERK
Jack Lam, AICP
James L. Markman
Debra J. Adams, CMC
Ol2llER OF 13L1SINF..SS
CLOSED SESSION Tapia Conference Room............ 5:30 P.M.
REGULAR MEETING Council Chambers ......................... 7:00 P.M.
~, INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC -
//~
.? RANCHO
r J CUCAMONGA
TO ADDRESS THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY. FIRE BOARD AND CITY COUNCIL
The Agency, Fire Board and City Council encourage free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to
speak, given the length of the Agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your
position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may
present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience
should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience.
The public may address the Agency, Fire Board or City Council by filling out a speaker card and submitting it to the
City Clerk. The speaker cards are located on the wall at the back of the Chambers, at the front desk behind the
staff table and at the City Clerk's desk. During "Public Communications," your name will be called to speak on any
item listed or not listed on the agenda in the order in which it was received. If you are present to speak on an
"Advertised Public Hearing" item, your name will be called when that item is being discussed. Comments are to be
limited to five minutes per individual.
Any handouts for the Agency, Fire Board or City Council should be given to the City Clerk for distribution.
AGENDA BACK-UP MATERIALS
Staff reports and back-up materials for agenda items are available for review at the City Clerk's counter, Public
Library and on the City's website. A complete copy of the agenda is also available at the desk located behind the
staff table during the Council meeting.
LIVE BROADCAST
Agency, Fire Board and Council meetings are broadcast live on Channel 3 for those with cable television access.
Meetings are rebroadcast on the second and fourth Wednesdays of each month at 11:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. The
City has added the option for customers without cable access to view the meetings "on-demand" from their
computers. The added feature of "Streaming Video On Demand" is available on the City's website at
www.ci.rancho-cucamonga.ca.us/whatsnew.htm for those with Hi-bandwidth (DSUCable Modem) or Low-
bandwidth (Dial-up) Internet service.
The Agency, Fire Board and City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the
month at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive.
Members of the City Council also sit as the Redevelopment Agency and the Fire District Board.
Copies of the agendas and minutes can be found at http:llwww.ci.rancho-cucamonga.ca.us
® If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting Please
contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477-2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the
meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility.
Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired.
Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session.
ZnxcHo REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
MARCH 7, 2007
I
UCAMONGA
A. 5:30 P.M. -CLOSED SESSION
CALL TO ORDER - TAPIA ROOM
1. Roll Call: Mayor Kurth
Mayor Pro Tem Williams
Councilmembers Gutierrez, Michael and Spagnolo
CLOSED SESSION CALLED TO ORDER AS THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY.
B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEMS
C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)
D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION
1. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE
SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST
CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND HERMOSA AVENUE, LINDA D. DANIELS,
RDA DIRECTOR, NEGOTIATING PARTY- RDA
E. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS
F. RECESS
CLOSED SESSION TO RECESS TO THE REGULAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING AT
7:00 P.M. IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS AT CITY HALL, LOCATED AT 10500 CIVIC CENTER
DRIVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA.
~ ~~win w
G. REGULAR MEETING
CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ANDCITY COUNCIL WILL BE
CALLED TO ORDER. IT IS THE INTENT TO CONCLUDE THE MEETINGS BY 10:00 P.M.,
UNLESS EXTENDED BY CONCURRENCE OF THE AGENCY AND COUNCIL.
1. Pledge of Allegiance
2. Roll Call: Mayor Kurth
Mayor Pro Tem Williams
Councilmembers Gutierrez, Michael and Spagnolo
H. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
I. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
~ This is the time and place for the general public to address the Redevelopment Agency
and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the
Agency or City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda.
The Agency, Fire Board, or City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a
subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual.
J. AGENCY/COUNCIL RESPONSES
TO PUBLIC COMMENTS
This is the time and place for the Agency or City Council to respond to comments made by
the general public.
K. CONSENT CALENDAR-REDEVELOPMENTAGENCY
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial.
They will be acted upon by the Agency at one time without discussion. Any item may be
removed by an Agencymember for discussion.
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 3
MARCH 7, 2007
RANCHO
UCAMONGA
1. Approval of Minutes: February 7, 2007
2. Approval of Check Register dated February 14 through February 27, 2007 and Payroll far 1
the total amount of $2,138,713.88.
3. Approval to rescind the award for the purchase of one (1) lot of IBM computer hardware, 3
imaging services, and warranties for notebook computers in the total amount of $507,151
per RFB#06/07-010 from M&M Computers and award the purchase of one (1) lot of IBM
computer hardware, imaging services, and warranties for notebook computers in the total
amount of $536,097 per RFB#06/07-010 to New Tech Solutions, Inc., to be funded as
follows: computer hardware in the amount of $515,840 from the following account numbers:
$17,771 (Acct. No. 2630801-5215), $1,960 (Acct. No. 1001209-5215), $2,725 (Acct. No.
1100202-5215) and $493,384 (Acct. No. 1714001-5215); and warranties for notebook
computers in the amount of $20,257 from Acct. No. 1714001-5300; and authorization to
appropriate $6,867 into Acct. No. 1714001-5215, $2,329 into Acct. No. 1714001-5152, and
$1,266 into Acct. No. 1714001-5300 from the Computer Equipment Replacement Fund to
fully fund the award.
4. Approve to accept the improvements constructed by Letner Roofing Company at the Victoria
Gardens Cultural Center as complete and authorization to file a Notice of Completion for the 5
improvements.
RESOLUTION NO. RA 07-002 6
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS COMPLETED BY LETNER ROOFING
COMPANY FOR THE VICTORIA GARDENS CULTURAL CENTER
PROJECT, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
K. CONSENT CALENDAR-CITY COUNCIL
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial.
They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be
removed by a Councilmember for discussion.
5. Approval of Minutes: February 7, 2007
February 12, 2007 (special meeting re animal care & services)
6. Approval of Check Register dated February 14 through February 27, 2007, and payroll 7
ending February 27, 2007, for the total amount of $4,238,602.01.
7. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids for the Citvwide Wood 34
Barricade Retrofit, to be funded from Acct. No. 1025001-5650/1539025-0 as approved in the
FY 2006/07 Budget.
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 4
MARCH 7, 2007
RANCHO
UCAMONGA
RESOLUTION NO. 07-050 35
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR "CITYWIDE WOOD BARRICADE RETROFIT"
AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO
ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
8. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids' for the Highland Avenue 39
Gates at Highland Avenue east of San Benito Avenue and Fairmont Wav north of Kenvon
Wav, to be funded from Transportation Funds, Acct. No. 124303-5650/1514124-0.
RESOLUTION NO. 07-051 ~ 41
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR "HIGHLAND AVENUE GATES AT HIGHLAND
AVENUE EAST OF SAN BENITO AVENUE AND FAIRMONT WAY
NORTH OF KENYON WAY" IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND
DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
Approval to quitclaim a storm drain easement at the Inland Empire Regional Compost 45
Facility, located at 12645 Sixth Street (APN: 229-283-61; related file: DRC2003-00097).
RESOLUTION NO. 07-052 ~ 47
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FINDING THAT SAID EASEMENT,
MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, TO BE
UNNECESSARY, AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY
ENGINEER AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE THAT CERTAIN DEED, A
COPY OF WHICH IS ATTACHED HERETO AS EXHIBIT "A", AND TO
CAUSE THE SAME TO BE RECORDED.
10. Approval of a request from "4 A Safe Ride Home" organization for the waiver of Central Park 48
room rental fees for a fundraising event to be held on April 13, 2007.
11. Authorization of supplemental funding in the amount of $456,500 ($415,000 and a 10% 50
contingency of $41,500) for the Animal Care and Services Department Capital Construction
Budget to continue phase II of medical area modifications with the project, to be funded by
Capital Reserves (Fund 025) and/or Fund 001 fund balance, and authorization for the
related appropriations into the appropriate account numbers to be determined bystaff.
12. Approval of a Resolution repealing Resolution No. 02-229 regarding the Freedom's Flame 51
Project.
RESOLUTION NO. 07-053 ~ 52
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING ITS RESOLUTION NOS.
02-229 AND 05-279 CONCERNING THE FREEDOM'S FLAME
PROJECT
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 5
MARCH 7, 2007
13. Approval to rescind the award for the purchase of one (1) lot of IBM computer hardware, 53
imaging services, and warranties for notebook computers in the total amount of $507,151
per RFB#06/07-010 from M&M Computers and award the purchase of one (1) lot of IBM
computer hardware, imaging services, and warranties for notebook computers in the total
amount of $536,097 per RFB#06/07-010 to New Tech Solutions, Inc., to be funded as
follows: computer hardware in the amount of $515,840 from the following account numbers:
$17,771 (Acct. No. 2630801-5215), $1,960 (Acct. No. 1001209-5215), $2,725 (Acct. No.
1100202-5215) and $493,384 (Acct. No. 1714001-5215); and warranties for notebook
computers in the amount of $20,257 from Acct. No. 1714001-5300; and authorization to
appropriate $6,867 into Acct. No. 1714001-5215, $2,329 into Acct. No. 1714001-5152, and
$1,266 into Acct. No. 1714001-5300 from the Computer Equipment Replacement Fund to
fully fund the award.
14. Approval to accept grant revenue in the amount of $17,276.00 awarded by the Department 55
of Homeland Security (Homeland Security Grant 2006), administered by the State of
California and San Bernardino County Office of Emergency Services, into Acct. No.
1380000-4740 (Grant Income); and authorization to appropriate $17,276.00 into Acct. No.
1380501-5207 (O&M/Capital Supplies), and approval for the single source purchase of
Motorola radios and accessories from Motorola Communications, in the amount of
$17,276.00, funded from Acct. No. 1380501-5207.
15. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities, Monumentation Cash
Deposit and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street 57
Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 for Tract Map 16592, located on the north side of
Hillside Road, west of Archibald Avenue, submitted by Toll Brothers, Inc.
RESOLUTION NO. 07-054 59
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND MONUMENTATION
CASH DEPOSIT FOR TRACT 16592
RESOLUTION NO. 07-055 ~ 60
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF
CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1
AND 2 FOR TRACT MAP 16592
16. Approval to accept the bids. received and award and authorize the execution of the contract 68
in the amount of $74,264.00 to the apparent low bidder, International Pavement Solutions,
Incorporated (CO 07-026), and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the
amount of $7,430.00 for the Cucamonga Creek Channel Bike Trail from Foothill Boulevard to
Base Line Road and Red Hill Park Exercise Trail, to be funded from Beautification Funds,
Acct. No. 1110316-5650/1533110-0, BTA Funds, Acct. No. 1192303-5650/1533192-0 and
PD-85 Funds, Acct. No. 1848303-5650/1594848-0 and appropriate an additional amount of
$1,000 to Acct. No. 1848303-5650/1594848-0 from PD-85 Fund balance.
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 6
MARCH 7, 2007
RANCHO
UCAMONGA
17. Approval to accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract 74
in the amount of $347,947 to the apparent low bidder, Mobassaly Engineering, Inc., (CO 07-
027), and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $34,794.70 for
the construction of "Church Street Pavement Rehabilitation and Widening from 100+ west of
Pasito Avenue to Kinlock Avenue," to be funded from Measure "I" Funds, Acct. No. 1176303-
5650/1470216-0 and appropriate an additional amount of $35,000 to Acct. No. 1176303-
5650/1470176-0 from Measure "I" Fund balance.
18. Approval to accept improvements, retain $2,320.00 of the Faithful Performance Cash
Deposit in lieu of a Maintenance Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for 80
DRC2002-00922, located at the east side of Fairway View Place, south of 6`" Street,
submitted by Fairway Business Center on Milliken.
RESOLUTION NO. 07-056 82
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2002-00922 AND AUTHORIZING THE
FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
19. Approval to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 16312, located on the $3
northwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Church Street, submitted by Victoria Arbors,
LLC.
20. Approval to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 16370, located on the
northwest corner of Church Street and Arbor Lane, submitted by Standard Pacific and US 85
Homes Corporations.
21. Approval to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 16371, located on the 87
southwest corner of Victoria Park Lane and Base Line Road, submitted by US Homes
Corporation.
22. Approval to release Faithful Performance Bond No. 7573826 in the amount of $998,694.00 gg
for the 2005/06 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation -Overlay of Various Streets, Contract
No. 05-074.
L. CONSENT ORDINANCES
The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first reading. Second
readings are expected to be routine and non-controversial. The Agency, Fire Board, or
Council will act upon them at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the
title. Any item can be removed for discussion by an Agencymember, Boardmember, or
Councilmember.
No Items Submitted.
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ~
MARCII 7, 2007
u~nwln_e
M. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
CITY COUNCIL
The following items have been advertised andlor posted as public hearings as required by
law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony.
1. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT
91
DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2005-01008 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A
request to change the Development District from Industrial Park (Subarea 7), to General
Commercial (to reflect the current General Plan Designation of General Commercial),
located at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue -APN: 0229-
021-31 and 32. Related Files: Conditional Use Permit DRC2005-01084, Tentative Parcel
Map SUBTPM17818. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of
environmental impacts for consideration.
ORDINANCE NO. 773 (first reading) 175
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
AMENDMENT DRC2005-01008, CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A
REQUEST TO CHANGE THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT FROM
INDUSTRIAL PARK (SUBAREA 7), TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL (TO
REFLECT THE CURRENT GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION OF
GENERAL COMMERCIAL), LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER
OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND ROCHESTER AVENUE, APN: 0229-
021-31 AND 32; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
2. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION AMENDING ELECTRIC RATES. FEES AND 17$
CHARGES PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS AND AUTHORITY OF CHAPTER 3.46
OF TITLE 3 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE
RESOLUTION NO. 07-057 180
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ELECTRIC RATES, FEES
AND CHARGES PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS AND
AUTHORITY OF CHAPTER 3.46 OF TITLE 3 OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE
N. PUBLIC HEARINGS
The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements.
1. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 7.02 OF TITLE 7 OF THE 182
MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING NEW SECTIONS 7.02.050 AND 7.02.060 RELATING TO
PEG SUPPORT FOR LOCAL CABLE USAGE AND'SPECIAL PROVISIONS APPLICABLE
TO HOLDERS OF STATE VIDEO FRANCHISES
Q :I7CAMON('.A
ORDINANCE NO. 774 (first reading) 183 i
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 7.02 OF TITLE 7
OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING NEW SECTIONS 7.02.050
AND 7.02.060 RELATING TO PEG SUPPORT FOR LOCAL CABLE
USAGE AND SPECIAL PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO HOLDERS OF
STATE VIDEO FRANCHISES
O. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements.
No Items Submitted.
P. COUNCIL BUSINESS
The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion.
1. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per
Councilmember.)
2. LEGISLATIVE AND REGIONAL UPDATES (Oral)
Q. ,IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
R. ADJOURNMENT
I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby
certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on March 1, 2007,
seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic
Center Drive.
RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Pl
Aaenda Check Reeister
2/14/2007 through 2/27/2007
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00247866 2/14/2007 BNY WESTON TRUST 131,039.00
AP - 00247866 2/14/2007 BNY WESTON TRUST 568,961.00
AP - 00247866 2/14/2007 BNY WESTON TRUST -5,282.88
AP - 00247868 2/14/2007 BRODART BOOKS 8,201.16
AP - 00247868 2/14/2007 BRODART BOOKS 7,673.69
AP - 00247868 2/14/2007 BRODART BOOKS 14,604.90
AP - 00247868 2/14/2007 BRODART BOOKS 8,170.83
AP - 00247868 2/14/2007 BRODART BOOKS 18,207.97
AP - 00247881 2/14/2007 CHFA 168,800.00
AP - 00247892 2/14/2007 COSTAR REALTY INFORMATION INC 1,481.74
AP - 00247899 2/14/2007 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 56,940.00
AP - 00247923 2/14/2007 FRANCE PUBLICATIONS INC. 2,850.95
AP - 00247928 2/14/2007 G AND M BUSINESS INTERIORS 1,318.86
AP - 00247928 2/14/2007 G AND M BUSINESS INTERIORS 3,221.73
AP - 00247928 2/14/2007 G AND M BUSINESS INTERIORS 1,868.13
AP - 00247937 2/14/2007 HILL AND KNOWLTON INC 6,483.75
AP - 00247937 2/14/2007 HILL AND KNOWLTON INC 759.80
AP - 00247953 2/14/2007 INLAND EMPIRE MAGAZINE 4,195.00
AP - 00247980 2/14/2007 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 1,025.00
AP - 00247991 2/14/2007 MCGALLIARD & SONS INC, I B 28,444.91
AP - 00248025 2/14/2007 PIERRE SPRINKLER 8c LANDSCAPE 27,262.63
AP - 00248025 2/14/2007 PIERRE SPRINKLER & LANDSCAPE 38,478.10
AP - 00248025 2/14/2007 PIERRE SPRINKLER & LANDSCAPE 2,726.26
AP - 00248025 2/14/2007 PIERRE SPRINKLER & LANDSCAPE -2,726.26
AP - 00248046 2/14/2007 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 3,649.67
AP - 00248111 2/14/2007 VICTORIA GARDENS MALL LLC 1.00
AP - 00248173 2/21/2007 BERGELECTRIC CORPORATION 271,240.60
AP - 00248220 2/21/2007 DEKRA-CITE INDUSTRIES INC 665.42
AP - 00248243 2/21/2007 FOREMOST 25.86
AP - 00248250 2/21/2007 GEOGRAPHICS 75.69
AP - 00248250 2/21/2007 GEOGRAPHICS 10,205.75
AP - 00248258 2/21/2007 GROUP C COMMUNICATIONS INC 6,700.00
AP - 00248281 2/21/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 31.20
AP - 00248281 2/21/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 87.60
AP - 00248297 2/21/2007 LIM & NASCIMENTO ENGINEERING CORP 8,937.28
AP - 00248316 2/21/2007 NELSON, MIKE 21.24
AP - 00248319 2/21/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 10.67
AP - 00248319 2/21/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 52.69
AP - 00248319 2/21/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 157.53
AP - 00248319 2/21 /2007 OFFICE DEPOT 61.25
AP - 00248319 2/21/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 83.69
AP - 00248339 2/21/2007 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 4,730.00
AP - 00248345 2/21/2007 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 990.00
AP - 00248345 2/21/2007 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 3,445.73
AP - 00248345 2/21/2007 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 99.00
AP - 00248345 2/21/2007 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 74.50
AP - 00248345 2/21/2007 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 1.371.50
AP - 00248345 2/21/2007 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 5,072.10
AP - 00248345 2/21/2007 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 1,915.50
AP - 00248345 2/21/2007 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 3,249.00
AP - 00248351 2/21/2007 SAFCO CAPITAL CORP 26,336.02
AP - 00248421 2/22/2007 BANK OF NEW YORK TRUST COMPANY N.A., T 131,039.00
AP - 00248421 2/22/2007 BANK OF NEW YORK TRUST COMPANY N.A, T 568,961.00
AP - 00248421 2/22/2007 BANK OF NEW YORK TRUST COMPANY N.A., T -5,282.88
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 1 Current Date: 02/28/200
Report: CK_AGENDA_R EG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 15:54:0
RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Agenda Check Re>?ister
2/14/2007 through 2/27/2007
Check No.
Check Date Vendor Name
Amount
Total for Check ID AP: 2,138,713.88
Total for Entity: 2,138,713.88
P2
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 2
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
Curren[ Date: 02/28/200
Time: 15:54:0
STAFF REPORT ~
_ ,~,
~~
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
RANCHO
C,UCAMONGA
Date: March 7, 2007
To: Redevelopment Agency Members
Jack Lam, Executive Director
From: Linda Daniels, Redevelopment Director
By: Manuel E. Pilonieta, Information Servic Manager
Dawn Haddon, Purchasing Manager
Subject: APPROVAL TO RESCIND THE AWARD FOR THE PURCHASE OF ONE (1) LOT
OF IBM COMPUTER HARDWARE, IMAGING SERVICES, AND WARRANTIES FOR
NOTEBOOK COMPUTERS IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF $507,151 PER
RFB#06/07-010 FROM M&M COMPUTERS AND AWARD THE PURCHASE OF
ONE (1) LOT OF IBM COMPUTER HARDWARE, IMAGING SERVICES, AND
WARRANTIES FOR NOTEBOOK COMPUTERS IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF
$536,097 PER RFB#06/07-010 TO NEW TECH SOLUTIONS, INC. TO BE FUNDED
AS FOLLOWS: COMPUTER HARDWARE IN THE AMOUNT OF $515,840, FROM
THE FOLLOWING ACCOUNT NUMBERS: $17,771, (ACCOUNT NO. 2630801-
5215), $1,960, (ACCOUNT NO. 1001209-5215), $2,725, (ACCOUNT NO. 1100202-
5215) AND $493,384, (ACCOUNT NO. 1714001-5215); AND WARRANTIES FOR
NOTEBOOK COMPUTERS IN THE AMOUNT OF $20,257, FROM ACCOUNT NO.
1714001-5300; AND AUTHORIZATION TO APPROPRIATE $6,867 INTO ACCOUNT
NO. 1714001-5215, $2,329 INTO ACCOUNT NUMBER 1714001-5152, AND $1,266
INTO ACCOUNT NO. 1714001-5300 FROM THE COMPUTER EQUIPMENT
REPLACEMENT FUND TO FULLY FUND THE AWARD
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended to approve to rescind the award for the purchase of one (1) lot of IBM
computer hardware, imaging services, and warranties for notebook computers in the total
amount of $507,151 per RFB#06/07-010 from M&M Computers and award the purchase of one
(1) lot of IBM computer hardware, imaging services, and warranties for notebook computers to
New Tech Solutions, Inc. in the total amount of $536,097 per RFB#06/07-010 to be funded as
follows: computer hardware in the amount of $515,840, from the following account numbers:
$17,771, (Account No. 2630801-5215), $1,960, (Account No. 1001209-5215), $2,725, (Account
No. 1100202-5215) and $493,384, (Account No. 1714001-5215), and warranties for notebook
computers in the amount of $20,257, from Account No. 1714001-5300; and authorization to
appropriate $6,867 into Account No. 1714001-5215, $2,329 into Account No. 1 71 4001-51 52,
and $1,255 into Account No. 1714001-5300 from the computer equipment replacement fund to
fully fund the award.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
P3
In Fiscal Year 2005/06, the City replaced approximately one-third of its aged computer
equipment with new Lenovo notebook and desktop computers. As part of the City's equipment
lifecycle program, the Information Systems Division is proposing the replacement of the
P4
MAxCH 7, ?007
remaining two-thirds of the aged computer equipment using funds that have been allocated for
the current fiscal year. The existing computer equipment is over six years old, past its useful
life, and needs to be replaced. The replacement of this equipment will reduce maintenance
costs, improve security, and provide computers that will meet the City's current and future
technology needs.
On January 17, 2007, Council approved an award to M&M Computers. However, upon receipt
of additional information from this vendor, it was determined that M&M Computers was non-
responsive. The second lowest bidder, Computek, International, was also determined to be
non-responsive upon receipt of additional information. Therefore an award is recommended to
New Tech Solutions, Inc., the next lowest, most responsive and responsible bidder.
Respectfully submitted~t,t~.
. 0~~~~ U
Lin/
Redevelopment Director
STAFF REPORT -
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
RANCHO
Date: March 7, 2007 C,UCAMONGA
To: Chairman and Redevelopment Agency Members
Jack Lam, AICP, Executive Director
From: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director
Subject: APPROVAL TO ACCEPT THE IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED BY
LETNER ROOFING COMPANY AT THE VICTORIA GARDENS CULTURAL
CENTER AS COMPLETE; AUTHORIZATION TO FILE A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS; AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY
CLERK TO RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND
RECOMMENDATION
That the Redevelopment Agency accept improvements constructed by Letner Roofing
Company at the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center located at 12505 Cultural Center Drive,
as complete; authorize the filing of a Notice of Completion for the improvements; and,
authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond.
BACKGROUND
On August 18, 2004, construction contracts for various trades for the City of Rancho
Cucamonga's first multi-prime construction project, the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center,
were awarded by the Redevelopment Agency. The project is now complete and a
Certificate of Occupancy was issued on August 14, 2006.
Letner Roofing Company, one of the prime contractors for the project, has completed their
contract, and their final contract amount is $461,602. It is now therefore recommended that
the City Council accept the improvements from Letner Roofing Company as complete,
authorize the filing of a Notice of Completion for the work, and authorize the City Clerk to
release the Faithful Performance Bond. Staff will process additional Notices of Completion
for the remaining contractors once their outstanding punch list corrections are made.
As a part of the close out of the trade contracts and purchase orders, unused contingency
funds are being disencumbered and re-appropriated to those contracts whose change
orders exceeded the original 5%.
Ily su
P5
Comrruanity Services Director
P6
RESOLUTION NO. Rf3 D7" ~Dz
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS COMPLETED BY
LETNER ROOFING COMPANY FOR THE VICTORIA GARDENS CULTURAL CENTER PROJECT,
AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements by Letner Roofing
Company for the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center Project, have been completed to the
satisfaction of the City; and '
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work
complete.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Clerk is authorized to
sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P7
Agenda Check Register
2/14/2007 through 2/27/2007
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00247848 2/14/2007 A&V SOFTBALL 2,967.00
AP - 00247849 2/14/2007 A'JONTUE, ROSE ANN 1,45920
AP - 00247850 2/14/2007 ABLAC 16.39
AP - 00247851 2/14/2007 ABLETRONICS 13.15
AP - 00247852 2/14/2007 ACADEMY OF MUSIC 1,067.50
AP - 00247853 2/14/2007 ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 2,557.00
AP - 00247854 2/14/2007 ADVANCED SYSTEMS GROUP 8,000.00.
AP - 00247855 2/14/2007 AED INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC. 90.00
AP - 00247855 2/14/2007 AED INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC. 80.00
AP - 00247855 2/14/2007 AED INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC. 150.00
AP - 00247856 2/14/2007 AGILINE INC. 3,600.00
AP - 00247856 2/14/2007 AGILINE INC. 400.00
AP - 00247856 2/14/2007 AGILINE INC. 400.00
AP - 00247856 2/14/2007 AGILINE INC. 400.00
AP - 00247856 2/14/2007 AGILINE INC. 400.00
AP - 00247858 2/14/2007 ALLEN, TONY 810.00
AP - 00247860 2/14/2007 AMERI NATIONAL COMMUNITY SERVICES INC 280.00
AP - 00247862 2/14/2007 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 48.18
AP - 00247863 2/14/2007 ASSOCIATED POWER INC 158.76
AP - 00247863 2/14/2007 ASSOCIATED POWER INC 255.85
AP - 00247864 2/14/2007 AVHQ 265.00
AP - 00247867 2/14/2007 BODY SHOTS 409.50
AP - 00247869 2/14/2007 BRUNSWICK DEER CREEK LANES 462.00
AP - 00247871 2/14/2007 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STAT 2,593.00
AP - 00247872 2/14/2007 CALLEROS, SHELLEY 36.00
AP - 00247873 2/14/2007 CAR CARE & TRANSMISSION PRO 35.14
AP - 00247874 2/14/2007 CARRILLO, TRINA 524.40
AP - 00247876 2/14/2007 CARTY, DIANE 630.00
AP - 00247877 2/14/2007 CASTILLQ JACK 480.00
AP - 00247878 2/14/2007 CENTER ICE ARENA 28.00
AP - 00247879 2/14/2007 CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HS DISTRICT 1,356.30
AP - 00247880 2/14/2007 CHARTER MEDIA INC. 2,197.60
AP - 00247880 2/14/2007 CHARTER MEDIA INC. 1,121.12
AP - 00247880 2/14/2007 CHARTER MEDIA INC. 450.00
AP - 00247882 2/14/2007 CLABBY, SANDRA 1,000.00
AP - 00247884 2/14/2007 CLARK, KAREN 35.00
AP - 00247885 2/14/2007 COLOR ME MINE 118.00
AP - 00247886 2/14/2007 COMBINED MARTIAL SCIENCE INC 2,307.55
AP - 00247888 2/]4/2007 COMP USA INC 465.00
AP - 00247889 2/14/2007 COMPOMIZZI, ROSALIE 70.00
AP - 00247890 2/14/2007 COPIES & INK PRINTING INC. 7249
AP - 00247890 2/14/2007 COPIES & INK PRINTING INC. 1 ] t.24
AP - 00247890 2/14/2007 COPIES & INK PRINTING INC. 38.75
AP - 00247890 2/14/2007 COPIES & INK PRINTING INC. 135.10
AP - 00247891 2/14/2007 CORTESE, GINA 50.00
AP - 00247893 2/]4/2007 CPSRPTC 698.00
AP - 00247894 2/14/2007 CROW, JOY 8.24
AP - 00247897 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 425.78
AP - 00247897 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 200.24
AP - 00247897 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 118.34
AP - 00247897 2/]4/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 422.00
AP - 00247897 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.60
AP - 00247897 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 106.94
AP - 00247897 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 129.68
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 1 Current Date: 02/28/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:50:5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
2/14/2007 through 2/27/2007
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00247897 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,753.58
AP - 00247897 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 234.20
AP - 00247897 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 316.16
AP - 00247897 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 434.54
AP - 00247897 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 279.56
AP - 00247897 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 33.68
AP - 00247897 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 648.74
AP - 00247897 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 119.60
AP - 00247897 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 61.40
AP - 00247897 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 486.26
AP - 00247897 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 243.02
AP - 00247897 2/]4/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 237.93
AP - 00247897 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 31.52
AP - 00247897 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 51.32
AP - 00247897 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 128.18
AP - 00247897 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 51.32
AP - 00247897 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 95.42
AP - 00247897 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 440.84
AP - 00247897 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 214.10
AP - 00247897 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 192.68
AP - 00247897 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 127.16
AP - 00247897 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 221.66
AP - 00247897 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 122.12
AP - 00247897 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 147.08
AP - 00247897 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 183.62
AP - 00247897 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 150.86
AP - 00247897 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 607.16
AP - 00247897 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 646.22
AP - 00247897 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 55.20
AP - 00247897 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 6,191.43
AP - 00247897 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,582.66
AP - 00247897 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 752.06
AP - 00247897 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 710.48
AP - 00247897 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 521.54
AP - 00247897 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 340.04
AP - 00247897 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 263.24
AP - 00247897 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 25.00
AP - 00247897 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 25.00
AP - 00247897 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 224.18
' AP - 00247897 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 25.00
AP - 00247897 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 338.78
AP - 00247897 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 777.53
AP - 00247897 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 191.36
AP - 00247897 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 39.98
AP - 00247897 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 137.18
AP - 00247897 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 566.90
AP - 00247897 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 282.14
AP - 00247897 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 188.90
AP - 00247897 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 88.10
AP - 00247897 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 110.72
AP - 00247897 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 180.08
AP - 00247897 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 44.12
AP - 00247897 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 55.20
AP - 00247897 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 582.10
P8
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 2 Curren[ Date: 02/28/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:50:5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA pg
Agenda Check Register
2/14/2007 through 2/27/2007
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00247897 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 70.78
AP - 00247897 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 159.86
AP - 00247897 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 999.67
AP - 00247898 2/14/2007 DAGHDEVIRIAN, KATHY 1,263.60
AP - 00247899 2/14/2007 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 12,263.32
AP - 00247900 2/14/2007 DANCE TERRIFIC 1,807.72
AP - 00247901 2/14/2007 DAVENPORT, JAY E. 306.00
AP - 00247902 2/14/2007 DELTA DENTAL 43,398.45
AP.- 00247903 2/14/2007 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 2,557.00
AP - 00247903 2/14/2007 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 1,421.00
AP - 00247904 2/14/2007 DODSON & ASSOCIATES, TOM 1,080.00
AP - 00247905 2/14/2007 DOMINICK, TOM 2,257.00
AP - 00247906 2/14/2007 DRACHAND, DI ANNE 684.00
AP - 00247907 2/14/2007 DUFFY, RICK 3,332.00
AP - 00247908 2/14/2007 DUNN, ANN MARIE 1,587.00
AP - 00247910 2/14/2007 DUROST, BARBARA 600.00
AP - 00247911 2/14/2007 EFTYCHIOU, AUDREY 75.00
AP - 00247912 2/14/2007 EIDEN, EMILY 75.00
AP - 00247914 2/14/2007 EXPERIAN 50.00
AP - 00247915 2/14/2007 EYE SPY LA 550.00
AP - 00247916 2/14/2007 FAIRWAY PALMS LLC 512.00
AP - 00247920 2/14/2007 FOOTHILL FAMILY SHELTER 417.00
AP - 00247920 2/14/2007 FOOTHILL FAMILY SHELTER 417.00
AP - 00247920 2/14/2007 FOOTHILL FAMILY SHELTER 417.00
AP - 00247921 2/14/2007 FORD OF UPLAND INC 22222
AP - 00247921 2/14/2007 FORD OF UPLAND INC 153.85
AP - 00247921 2/14/2007 FORD OF UPLAND INC 39.93
AP - 00247922 2/14/2007 FOSTER, DANA W. 577.74
AP - 00247925 2/14/2007 FRONT BRIDGE TECHNOLOGIES INC 850.00
AP - 00247926 2/]4/2007 FUKUSHIMA, JUDITH 2,904.00
AP - 00247927 2/14/2007 FULLMER CONSTRUCTION 500.00
AP - 00247929 2/14/2007 GAPPCO LLC 57,960.00
AP - 00247930 2/14/2007 GIORDANO, MARIANNA 401.00
AP - 00247933 2/14/2007 HANGER 18 LLC. 126.00
AP - 00247934 2/14/2007 HARALAMBOS BEVERAGE COMPANY 561.25
AP - 00247936 2/14/2007 HEILIG, KELLY 959.40
AP - 00247938 2/14/2007 HOLIDAY PRINTING 3,573.03
AP - 00247938 2/14/2007 HOLIDAY PRINTING 1,875.10
AP - 00247939 2/14/2007 HOUSE OF RUTH 1,515.74
AP - 00247940 2/14/2007 HOWARD, BOBBY 112.00
AP - 00247942 2/14/2007 HOYT, RAYMOND 645.00
AP - 00247943 2/14/2007 HSU, STEVE 384.00
AP - 00247944 2/14/2007 HULS ENVIRONMENTAL MGT LLC 3,622.50
AP - 00247945 2/14/2007 HUTCHINSON, LISA 1,800.00
AP - 00247946 2/14/2007 IBM CORPORATION 11,362.44
AP - 00247948 2/14/2007 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY INC 39.45
AP - 00247948 2/14/2007 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY INC 113.89
AP - 00247948 2/14/2007 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY INC 501.60
AP - 00247948 2/14/2007 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY INC 464.80
AP - 00247948 2/14/2007 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY INC 159.05
AP - 00247948 2/14/2007 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY INC -408.41
AP - 00247949 2/]4/2007 IMPRESSIONS GOURMET CATERING 360.96
AP - 00247950 2/14/2007 IMSA 360.00
AP - 00247951 2/14/2007 INDRAPUTRA, ATTE 500.00 _
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 3 Current Date: 02/28/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:50:5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
A>?enda Check Register
2/14/2007 through 2/27/2007
Check Nu. Check Date Vendor Name Amoun[
AP - 00247951 2/14/2007 INDRAPUTRA, ATTE 500.00
AP - 00247952 2/14/2007 INLAND EMPIRE ACADEMY OF THE ARTS 23,944.00
AP - 00247954 2/14/2007 INLAND FAIR HOUSING AND MEDIATION 839.40
AP - 00247954 2/]4/2007 INLAND FAIR HOUSING AND MEDIATION 616.85
AP - 00247954 2/14/2007 INLAND FAIR HOUSING AND MEDIATION 720.33
AP - 00247954 , 2/14/2007 INLAND FAIR HOUSING AND MEDIATION 655.49
AP - 00247955 2/14/2007 INLAND VALLEY DANCE ACADEMY 3,627.00
AP - 00247956 2/14/2007 IRON MOUNTAIN 658.80
AP - 00247957 2/14/2007 IRONWOOD APARTMENTS LLC 512.00
AP - 00247958 2/14/2007 ISSI DATA 1,917.95
AP - 00247959 2/]4/2007 JOHNSON, ERIC CURTIS 75.00
AP - 00247960 2/14/2007 JONES, ROBERT 2,800.00
AP - 00247961 2/14/2007 KAI, YI 240.00
AP - 00247962 2/14/2007 KAPLAN, DENEAN 696.60
AP - 00247963 2/14/2007 KARSCH, DAYNA 360.00
AP - 00247964 2/14/2007 KB HOME 60.07
AP - 00247965 2/14/2007 KCAL 96.7 5,030.00
AP - 00247966 2/14/2007 KELLEY, BRIAN 608.31
AP - 00247967 2/14/2007 KIM, DANIEL 346.50
AP - 00247969 2/14/2007 KOLA 99.9 4,680.00
AP - 00247970 2/14/2007 KORANDA CONSTRUCTION 4,800.00
AP - 0024797] 2/14/2007 KRAZAN AND ASSOCIATES INC 1,100.00
AP - 00247972 2/14/2007 KSPA AM 3,000.00
AP - 00247973 2/14/2007 LACQUES, JOHN 800.00
AP - 00247974 2/14/2007 LATINWO, ERIKA 44.00
AP - 00247975 2/14/2007 LESLIE, DANIEL 75.00
AP - 00247976 2/14/2007 LESTER, RANDY 105.00
AP - 00247978 2/14/2007 LIM, HEATHER 870.00
AP - 00247979 2/14/2007 LINA ]4,481.84
AP - 00247979 2/14/2007 LINA 14,493.99
AP - 00247979 2/14/2007 LINA 14,626.67
AP - 00247979 2/14/2007 LINA 14,855.39
AP - 00247981 2/14/2007 LLOYD DDS, JEFFERY D 92.73
AP - 00247982 2/14/2007 LOUIS, PETER 594.50
AP - 00247983 2/14/2007 MAD SCIENCE 198.00
AP - 00247984 2/14/2007 MAGRUDER, KAREN 234.00
AP - 00247987 2/14/2007 MANSOURI, IRAJ 4,800.00
AP - 00247988 2/14/2007 MARSHALL, SYLVIA 1,513.50
AP - 00247989 2/14/2007 MARTIN, LUZ 50.00
AP - 00247989 2/14/2007 MARTIN, LUZ 50.00
AP - 00247990 2/14/2007 MCCALEB, ERIN 374.40
AP - 00247991 2/14/2007 MCGALLIARD & SONS INC, J B 16,34].57
AP - 00247991 2/14/2007 MCGALLIARD & SONS INC, J B 14,598.86
AP - 00247991 2/14/2007 MCGALLIARD & SONS INC, J B 1,331.16
AP - 00247992 2/14/2007 MCGEE, JOANNE 75.00
AP - 00247995 2/14/2007 MIGLIACCI, THERESA 135.00
AP - 00247996 2/14/2007 MILLS, CAREY 883.20
AP - 00247998 2/14/2007 MOE, JOHN 558.00
AP - 00247999 2/14/2007 MORRIS, PAT 330.00
AP - 00248000 2/14/2007 MOTOROLA 15,871.10
AP - 00248001 2/14/2007 MOUNTAIN MOTOR SPORTS - 96.85
AP - 00248002 2/14/2007 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 151.60
AP - 00248003 2/14/2007 MR TS 24HR TOWING 75.00
AP - 00248003 2/14/2007 MR TS 24HR TOWING 75.00
P10
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 4 Current Date: 02/28/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CR: Agenda Check Register Pornait Layout Time: 15:50:5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAIONGA
Agenda Check ReEister
2/14/2007 through 2/27/2007
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00248003 2/14/2007 MR TS 24HR TOWING 75.00
AP - 00248004 2/14/2007 NATIONAL ANIMAL CONTROL ASSOCIATION 125.00
AP - 00248005 2/14/2007 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS 143.52
AP - 00248005 2/14/2007 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS 114.00
AP - 00248006 2/14/2007 NATIONAL DEFERRED 21,893.78
AP - 00248007 2/14/2007 NBS 1,500.00
AP - 00248007 2/14/2007 NBS 1,500.00
AP - 00248009 2/14/2007 NICHOLS, GARY 945.00
AP - 00248010 2/14/2007 NIELSEN, NETTLE 300.00
AP - 00248011 2/14/2007 OCASSE-PDC 175.00
AP - 00248013 2/14/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 32.65
AP - 00248013 2/14/2007 OFFICE DEPOT -87.11
AP - 00248013 2/14/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 96.93
AP - 00248013 2/14/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 57.45
AP - 00248013 2/14/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 422.29
AP - 00248013 2/14/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 242.05
AP - 00248013 2/14/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 63.41
AP - 00248013 2/14/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 1,076.98
AP - 00248013 2/14/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 46.33
AP - 00248013 2/14/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 31.04
AP - 00248013 2/14/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 317.04
AP - 00248013 2/14/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 11.35
AP - 00248013 2/14/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 25.39
AP - 00248013 2/14/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 79.61
AP - 00248013 2/14/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 309.34
AP - 00248013 2/14/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 42.85
AP - 00248013 2/14/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 244.41
AP - 00248013 2/14/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 120.08
AP - 00248013 2/14/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 60.04
AP - 00248013 2/]4/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 32.53
AP - 00248013 2/14/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 9.79
AP - 00248013 2/14/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 12.09
AP - 00248013 2/14/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 91.35
AP - 00248014 2/14/2007 ONESOURCE DISTRIBUTORS INC. 3.79
AP - 00248014 2/14/2007 ONESOURCE DISTRIBUTORS INC. 196.21
AP - 00248014 2/14/2007 ONESOURCE DISTRIBUTORS INC. -960.07
AP - 00248014 2/14/2007 ONESOURCE DISTRIBUTORS INC. 590.13
AP - 00248014 2/]4/2007 ONESOURCE DISTRIBUTORS INC. 171.20
AP - 00248014 2/]4/2007 ONESOURCE DISTRIBUTORS INC. 1,731.17
AP - 00248015 2/14/2007 ONTARIO ICE SKATING CENTER 1,478.40
AP - 00248017 2/14/2007 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 31.50
AP - 00248017 2/14/2007 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 21.44
AP - 00248017 2/14/2007 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE -0.70
AP - 00248017 2/14/2007 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 20.87
AP - 002480]7 2/]4/2007 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 16.14
AP - 00248017 2/14/2007 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 231.66
AP - 00248017 2/14/2007 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 46.27
AP - 00248017 2/14/2007 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 5.39
AP - 00248017 2/14/2007 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 123.88
AP - 00248017 2/14/2007 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 146.52
AP - 00248017 2/14/2007 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 6727
AP - 00248017 2/14/2007 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 77.53
AP - 00248017 2/14/2007 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 64.92
AP - 002480]7 2/]4/2007 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE -4.30
P11
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 5 Current Date: 02/28/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:50:5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P12
A>lenda Check Register
2/14/2007 through 2/27/2007
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00248017 2/14/2007 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE -24.52
AP - 00248017 2/14/2007 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 21.51
AP - 00248017 2/14/2007 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 59.37
AP - 00248017 2/14/2007 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 27.97
AP - 00248017 2/14/2007 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 6.24
AP - 00248017 2/14/2007 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 48.23
AP - 00248017 2/14/2007 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 125.39
AP - 00248017 2/14/2007 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 16.69
AP - 00248017 2/14/2007 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 176.07
AP - 00248017 2/14/2007 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 91.1 ]
AP - 00248018 2/14/2007 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 1,090.69
AP - 00248018 2/14/2007 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 1,150.05
AP - 00248018 2/14/2007 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 385.00
AP - 00248019 2/14/2007 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 185.00
AP - 00248020 2/14/2007 OWEN ELECTRIC INC 103.55
AP - 00248020 2/14/2007 OWEN ELECTRIC INC 10.78
AP - 00248020 2/14/2007 OWEN ELECTRIC INC 31.38
AP - 00248021 2/14/2007 PAPA 325.00
AP - 00248022 2/14/2007 PARS 3,500.00
AP - 00248023 2/14/2007 PC MAGAZINE 25.00
AP - 00248024 2/14/2007 PEREZVERTTI, DANIEL 200.00
AP - 00248025 2/14/2007 PIERRE SPRINKLER R LANDSCAPE 7,403.24
AP - 00248026 2/14/2007 PITNEY BOWES 11,043.38
AP - 00248026 2/]4/2007 PITNEY BOWES 50.00
AP - 00248026 2/14/2007 PITNEY BOWES -52.39
AP - 00248027 2/14/2007 PMI 25.20
AP - 00248029 2/14/2007 POMONA INLAND VALLEY COUNCIL OF CHURL 1,750.02
AP - 00248030 2/14/2007 POSTER SOLUTIONS 40.00
AP - 00248030 2/14/2007 POSTER SOLUTIONS 4.89
AP - 00248031 2/14/2007 POWER PLUS 25.00
AP - 00248032 2/14/2007 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 34.20
AP - 00248033 2/14/2007 PRECISION GYMNASTICS 1,643.25
AP - 00248034 2/14/2007 PRINCETON REVIEW, THE 36.00
AP - 00248035 2/14/2007 PROJECT SISTER 692.12
AP - 00248036 2/14/2007 PROMOTIONS TEES & MORE 1,914.53
AP - 00248037 2/14/2007 PURNASARI, CHANDRA 40.00
AP - 00248037 2/14/2007 PURNASARI, CHANDRA 5.00
AP - 00248038 2/14/2007 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 34.54
AP - 00248038 2/14/2007 R AND R AUTOMOTNE 154.54
AP - 00248038 2/14/2007 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 49.54
AP - 00248038 2/14/2007 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 49.54
AP - 00248038 2/14/2007 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 110.00
AP - 00248038 2/14/2007 R AND R AUTOMOTNE 47.51
AP - 00248038 2/14/2007 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 34.54
AP - 00248038 2/14/2007 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 218.28
AP - 00248038 2/]4/2007 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 200.25
AP - 00248038 2/14/2007 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 213.74
AP - 00248038 2/14/2007 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 33.86
AP - 00248038 2/14/2007 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 94.64
AP - 00248038 2/14/2007 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 50.00
AP - 00248038 2/14/2007 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 183.74
AP - 00248038 2/14/2007 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 50.00
AP - 00248038 2/14/2007 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 390.87
AP - 00248038 2/14/2007 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 1,120.60
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 6 Current Date: 02/28/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRA IT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:50:5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P13
Agenda Check Register
2/14/2007 tluough 2/27/2007
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00248038 2/14/2007 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 100.00
AP - 00248038 2/14/2007 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 158.44
AP - 00248038 2/14/2007 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 162.04
AP - 00248038 2/14/2007 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 743.61
AP - 00248038 2/14/2007 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 673.90
AP - 00248038 2/14/2007 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 29.76
AP - 00248038 2/14/2007 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 34.54
AP - 00248038 2/14/2007 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 509.85
AP - 00248038 2/14/2007 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 257.00
AP - 00248038 2/14/2007 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 396.97
AP - 00248038 2/14/2007 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 279.90
AP - 00248038 2/14/2007 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 440.17
AP - 00248038 2/14/2007 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 34.54
AP - 00248039 2/14/2007 R AND R LIGHTING COMPANY INC 116.89
AP - 00248041 2/14/2007 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 48.54
AP - 00248041 2/14/2007 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 19.40
AP-00248042 2/14/2007 RCPFA 7,714.94
AP - 00248043 2/14/2007 REISZ, BETSY 75.00
AP - 00248044 2/14/2007 RELIABLE GRAPHICS 17.59
AP - 00248044 2/14/2007 RELIABLE GRAPHICS 1,023.42
AP - 00248044 2/14/2007 RELIABLE GRAPHICS 104.62
AP - 00248045 2/14/2007 REMEDY 228.10
AP - 00248048 2/14/2007 RILEY, BREANNA 350.00
AP - 00248049 2/14/2007 RIVERA, ENOC 264.00
AP - 00248050 2/14/2007 RJM DESIGN GROUP FiVC 2,390.00
AP - 00248051 2/14/2007 ROBERTS COMPANY, O A 1,000.00
AP - 00248052 2/14/2007 RODGERS AND HAMMERSTEIN THEATRE LIBR 2,250.00
AP - 00248052 2/14/2007 RODGERS AND HAMMERSTEIN THEATRE LIBR 210.00
AP - 00248052 2/14/2007 RODGERS AND HAMMERSTEEV THEATRE LIBR 400.00
AP - 00248053 2/14/2007 RYAN, MICHAEL 500.00
AP - 00248054 2/14/2007 S AND S HARDWARE 2,726.08
AP - 00248055 2/14/2007 SAFELITE GLASS CORP 206.95
AP - 00248055 2/14/2007 SAFELITE GLASS CORP 483.88
AP - 00248056 2/]4/2007 SALMAN, CHAUNCEY 99.00
AP - 00248057 2/14/2007 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 22,360.80
AP - 00248058 2/14/2007 SAN BERNARDIIJO COUNTY 27,711.42
AP - 00248059 2/14/2007 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 4,869.02
AP - 00248060 2/14/2007 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 1,680.00
AP - 00248061 2/14/2007 SAN BERNARDINO CTY DEPT OF PUBLIC WORI 29,606.00
AP - 00248062 2/14/2007 SAXE-CLIFFORD, SUSAN 350.00
AP -00248063 2/]4/2007 SCHEU STEEL 2,160.00
AP - 00248064 2/14/2007 SCHREINER, DENISE 50.00
AP - 00248065 2/14/2007 SCOTT, SANDRA 34.00
AP - 00248066 2/14/2007 SCWMF 40.00
AP - 00248066 2/14/2007 SCWMF 40.00
AP-00248066 2/14/2007 SCWMF 40.00
AP - 00248066 2/14/2007 SCWMF 40.00
AP - 00248067 2/14/2007 SECC CORP 5,000.00
AP - 00248067 2/14/2007 SECC CORD 10,000.00
AP - 00248068 2/14/2007 SILVIA CONSTRUCTION INC 60,805.34
AP - 00248068 2/14/2007 SILVIA CONSTRUCTION INC 9,200.00
AP - 00248068 2/14/2007 SILVIA CONSTRUCTION INC -920.00
AP - 00248068 2/14/2007 SILVIA CONSTRUCTION INC -6,080.53
AP - 00248069 2/14/2007 SIMPLOT PART-HERS 428.85
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 7 Current Date: 02/28/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_R EG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:50:5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
2/14/2007 through 2/27/2007
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00248069 2/14/2007 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 829.03
AP - 00248069 2/14/2007 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 1,320.00
AP - 00248069 2/14/2007 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 394.30
AP - 00248069 2/14/2007 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 675.59
AP - 00248069 2/14/2007 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 1,447.08
AP - 00248070 2/14/2007 SIR SPEEDY 237.18
AP - 00248072 2/14/2007 SMITH PIPE AND SUPPLY INC 54.28
AP - 00248072 2/14/2007 SMITH PIPE AND SUPPLY INC -638.63
AP - 00248072 2/14/2007 SMITH PIPE AND SUPPLY INC 566.83
AP - 00248072 2/14/2007 SMITH PIPE AND SUPPLY INC 515.30
AP - 00248072 2/14/2007 SMITH PIPE AND SUPPLY INC 20.03
AP - 00248072 2/14/2007 SMITH PIPE AND SUPPLY INC 684.75
AP - 00248072 2/14/2007 SMITH PIPE AND SUPPLY INC 13.94
AP - 00248072 2/14/2007 SMITH PIPE AND SUPPLY INC 870.58
AP - 00248072 2/14/2007 SMITH PIPE AND SUPPLY INC 809.02
AP - 00248072 2/14/2007 SMITH P[PE AND SUPPLY INC 206.06
AP - 00248074 2/14/2007 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 4,699.33
AP - 00248074 2/14/2007 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 630.99
AP - 00248074 2/14/2007 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 607.59
AP - 00248074 2/14/2007 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 501.13
AP - 00248074 2/14/2007 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 502.89
AP - 00248074 2/14/2007 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 5,336.81
AP - 00248074 2/14/2007 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 1,102.46
AP - 00248075 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOC OF GOV 100.00
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 60.49
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 83.40
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 6,102.58
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 65.65
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1238
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.38
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 11.96
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.38
AP - 00248078 2/]4/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.48
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 82.78
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 222.10
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 125. ] 6
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.38
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.38
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 40.80
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 10,659.52
AP - 00248078 2/]4/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.29
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.55
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 108.69
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 47.29
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.68
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.64
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2328
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.55
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 707.39
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 549.92
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 526.02
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 47.58
AP - 00248078 2/]4/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.62
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 11.96
P14
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 8 Current Date: 02/28/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 1 S:S0:5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Reeister
2/14/2007 through 2/27/2007
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.38
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 44.48
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,655.05
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 52.20
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.38
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 49.87
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.10
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 56.83
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 143.89
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ~ 13.97
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 62.45
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.66
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.38
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 29.55
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 161.68
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 190.87
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 64.32
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 11.96
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 29.24
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.55
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.38
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 131.40
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 78.29
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.38
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 11.96
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.38
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.20
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.13
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.13
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 70.62
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 107.13
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1 ].96
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.24
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 11.96
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.38
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 49.34
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 42.36
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 924.72
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.41
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 107.35
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 64.37
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 128.88
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.03
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 64.32
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 68.07
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.82
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 85.06
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.96
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.61
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.83
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.64
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.02
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.03
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.38
P15
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 9 Current Date: 02/28/200
ReporbCK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 15:50:5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P16
Aeeuda Check Ret>ister
2/14/2007 tluough 2/27/2007
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 62.14
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.41
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.66
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 8.05
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.38
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.38
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.66
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.83
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.35
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 11.96
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 35.67
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 122.91
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.38
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.66
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNL4 EDISON 12.38
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 4.03
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.52
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.35
AP - 00248078 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 6,006.23
AP - 00248079 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 29.03
AP - 00248079 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 734.36
AP - 00248079 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 8,028.39
AP - 00248079 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 3,046.99
AP - 00248079 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 98.44
AP - 00248079 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 41.11
AP - 00248079 2/14/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 51.58
AP - 00248080 2/14/2007 SPEED AND POWER TRAINING, E M 225.00
AP - 00248081 2/14/2007 STAGE TECH 93.81
AP - 00248081 2/14/2007 STAGE TECH 336.00
AP - 00248082 2/14/2007 STEELWORKERS OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION 708.33
AP - 00248083 2/14/2007 STERICYCLE INC 378.72
AP - 00248084 2/14/2007 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 212.03
AP - 00248085 2/14/2007 STOVER SEED COMPANY 144.13
AP - 00248085 2/14/2007 STOVER SEED COMPANY 1,095.00
AP - 00248086 2/14/2007 SUNGARD BI TECH INC 450.00
AP - 00248087 2/14/2007 SUNRISE FORD 29,955.98
AP - 00248087 2/14/2007 SUNRISE FORD 19.37
AP - 00248088 2/14/2007 SUNSHINE GROWERS NURSERY INC 32.97
AP - 00248088 2/14/2007 SUNSHINE GROWERS NURSERY INC -25.32
AP - 00248089 2/14/2007 SWEDA, SHANNON 201.00
AP - 00248090 2/14/2007 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS 258.00
AP - 00248091 2/14/2007 TAYLOR, FELICIA E 75.00
AP - 00248093 2/14/2007 TERRY, DONNA 207.90
AP - 00248094 2/14/2007 TESFAZGHI, ASMAIT 1,784.78
AP - 00248095 2/14/2007 TOLL BROS INC 400,000.00
AP - 00248096 2/14/2007 TPRF/THC HAVEN PARK LLC 18.10
AP - 00248097 2/14/2007 TRAK ENGINEERING INC 700.00
AP - 00248098 2/14/2007 TRENDA, BRENDA 90.00
AP - 00248099 2/14/2007 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 813.44
AP - 00248099 2/14/2007 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 28.94
AP - 00248099 2/14/2007 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 51.42
AP - 00248099 2/14/2007 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 136.79
AP - 00248100 2/14/2007 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P, 3.552.19
AP - 00248100 2/14/2007 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P. 40,848.67
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 10 Current Date: 02/28/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:50:5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Resister
2/14/2007 through 2/27/2007
P17
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00248101 2/14/2007 UNITED RENTALS NORTHWEST INC 3,500.00
AP - 0024810] 2/14/2007 UNITED RENTALS NORTHWEST INC 798.81
AP - 00248101 2/14/2007 UNITED RENTALS NORTHWEST INC 2,500.00
AP - 00248102 2/14/2007 UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CA INC 132.71
AP - 00248102 2/14/2007 UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CA INC 182.34
AP - 00248103 2/14/2007 UNITED WAY 21.00
AP - 00248104 2/14/2007 UPLAND TENNIS CLUB 1,060.50
AP - 00248105 2/14/2007 UPS 25.80
AP - 00248106 2/14/2007 URBANQ VERNIE 840.00
AP - 00248107 2/14/2007 VANDERHAWK CONSULTING LLC 2,550.00
AP - 00248109 2/14/2007 VERIZON 59.88
AP - 00248109 2/14/2007 VERIZON 21.59
AP - 00248109 2/14/2007 VERIZON 19.27
AP - 00248109 2/14/2007 VERIZON 19.70
AP - 00248109 2/14/2007 VERIZON 162.19
AP-00248]09 2/14/2007 VERIZON 147.19
AP - 00248109 2/14/2007 VERIZON 327.91
AP-00248]09 2/14/2007 VERIZON 29.93
AP - 00248109 2/14/2007 VERIZON 89.75
AP - 00248109 2/14/2007 VERIZON 95.30
AP - 00248109 2/14/2007 VERIZON 29.01
AP - 00248109 2/14/2007 VERIZON 29.93
AP-00248109 2/14/2007 VERIZON 180.52
AP - 00248109 2/14/2007 VERIZON 35.57
AP - 00248109 2/14/2007 VERIZON 129.84
AP - 00248109 2/14/2007 VERIZON 35.48
AP - 00248109 2/]4/2007 VERIZON 29.93
AP - 00248109 2/14/2007 VERIZON 29.93
AP-00248]09 2/14/2007 VERIZON 89.75
AP - 00248109 2/]4/2007 VERIZON 89.75
AP - 00248109 2/14/2007 VERIZON 89.75
AP - 00248109 2/14/2007 VERIZON 89.75
AP-00248109 2/14/2007 VERIZON 29.02
AP - 00248109 2/14/2007 VERIZON 19.70
AP - 00248109 2/14/2007 VERIZON 29.93
AP-00248109 2/14/2007 VERIZON 19.70
AP - 00248109 2/14/2007 VERIZON 356.04
AP - 00248109 2/14/2007 VERIZON 29.01
AP - 00248109 2/14/2007 VERIZON 89.75
AP - 00248109 2/14/2007 VERIZON 37.12
AP - 00248109 2/14/2007 VERIZON 44.27
AP - 00248109 2/14/2007 VERIZON 82.44
AP - 00248109 2/14/2007 VERIZON 95.30
AP - 00248109 2/14/2007 VERIZON 29.94
AP-00248]09 2/14/2007 VERIZON 29.94
AP - 00248109 2/14/2007 VERIZON 61.09
AP - 00248109 2/]4/2007 VERIZON 30.57
AP - 00248109 2/14/2007 VERIZON 28.00
AP - 00248109 2/14/2007 VERIZON 89.75
AP - 00248109 2/14/2007 VERIZON 89.75
AP - 00248109 2/14/2007 VERIZON 89.75
AP - 00248109 2/ 14/2007 VERIZON 89.75
AP - 00248109 2/14/2007 VERIZON 95.29
AP - 00248109 2/14/2007 VERIZON 89.76
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: I I Current Date: 02/28/200
Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 15:50:5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA p~ g
Agenda Check Reffister
2/14/2007 through 2/27/2007
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP-00248109 2/]4/2007 VERIZON 89.75
AP-00248109 2/14/2007 VERIZON 89.76
AP - 00248109 2/14/2007 VERIZON 89.75
AP - 00248109 2/14/2007 VERIZON 89.76
AP - 00248 ] 09 2/14/2007 VERIZON 89.75
AP - 00248109 2/14/2007 VERIZON 29.01
AP - 00248109 2/14/2007 VERIZON 118.77
AP - 00248109 2/14/2007 VERIZON 29.02
AP - 00248109 2/14/2007 VERIZON 90.00
AP - 00248109 2/14/2007 VERIZON 19.70
AP - 00248109 2/14/2007 VERIZON 81.46
AP - 00248109 2/14/2007 VERIZON 29.93
AP - 00248109 2/14/2007 VERIZON 19.70
AP-00248109 2/]4/2007 VERIZON 29.93
AP - 00248109 2/14/2007 VERIZON 29.01
AP - 00248109 2/14/2007 VERIZON 29.93
AP - 00248109 2/14/2007 VERIZON 30.62
AP - 00248109 2/14/2007 VERIZON 89.75
AP - 00248109 2/14/2007 VERIZON 44.58
AP - 00248109 2/14/2007 VERIZON 91.56
AP - 00248109 2/14/2007 VERIZON 1,809.70
AP - 00248110 2/14/2007 VERNON, CITY OF 146,816.00
AP - 00248112 2/14/2007 VISTA PAINT 55.00
AP - 00248112 2/14/2007 VISTA PAINT 79.73
AP - 00248114 2/14/2007 VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY 184.51
AP - 00248115 2/14/2007 WALSH, COLLEEN 45.00
AP - 00248116 2/14/2007 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 6.18
AP - 00248117 2/14/2007 WARREN & CO INC, CARL 364.57
AP - 00248118 2/14/2007 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 56.00
AP - 00248118 2/14/2007 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 142.23
AP - 00248118 2/14/2007 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 97.94
AP - 00248118 2/]4/2007 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY -142.23
AP - 00248118 2/14/2007 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 56.00
AP - 00248118 2/14/2007 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 448.29
AP - 00248119 2/14/2007 WE DO EQUIPMENT REPAiR AND SUPPLY INC 1,406.14
AP - 00248121 2/14/2007 WEST COAST TURF 533.37
AP - 00248122 2/14/2007 WEST END MATERIAL SUPPLY 12.41
AP - 00248122 2/]4/2007 WEST END MATERIAL SUPPLY 265.98
AP - 00248123 2/14/2007 WEST END UNIFORMS 241.28
AP - 00248124 2/14/2007 WESTERN MEDICAL SUPPLY INC 122.03
AP - 00248124 2/14/2007 WESTERN MEDICAL SUPPLY INC 636.61
AP - 00248125 2/14/2007 WESTRUX INTERNATIOIv'AL INC 398.73
AP - 00248125 2/14/2007 WESTRUX INTERNATIONAL INC -70.15
AP - 00248125 2/14/2007 WESTRUX INTERNATIONAL INC 618.70
AP - 00248126 2/14/2007 WILLL4MS PHOTOGRAPHY, CHRIS 120.00
AP - 00248126 2/14/2007 WILLL4MS PHOTOGRAPHY, CHRIS 120.00
AP - 00248127 2/]4/2007 WILSON AND BELL 166.21
AP - 00248128 2/14/2007 WOLFF, STEVE 32.31
AP - 00248130 2/14/2007 YORK INDUSTRIES 355.58
AP - 00248130 2/14/2007 YORK INDUSTRIES 1,303.78
AP - 00248131 2/14/2007 YOUNG COMMERCIAL LLC 1,000.00
AP - 00248131 2/14/2007 YOUNG COMMERCIAL LLC 1,000.00
AP - 00248132 2/14/2007 ZAILO, ROBERT 115.20
AP - 00248133 2/14/2007 ZIRGES, ARLENE 207.00
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: ] 2 Current Date: 02/28/200
Report: CK_AGENDA_R EG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:50:5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA p7 g
Agenda Check Register
2/14/2007 through 2/27/2007
Check No. Check Date V"endor Name Amount
AP - 00248135 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.60
AP - 00248135 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 180.08
AP - 00248135 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 110.72
AP - 00248135 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 88.10
AP - 00248135 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 188.90
AP - 00248135 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 282.14
AP - 00248135 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 566.90
AP - 00248135 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 425.78
AP - 00248135 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 200.24
AP - 00248135 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 422.00
AP - 00248135 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 118.34
AP - 00248135 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 263.24
AP - 00248135 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 224.18
AP - 00248135 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 521.54
AP - 00248135 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 486.26
AP - 00248135 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 340.04
AP - 00248135 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 106.94
AP - 00248135 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 752.06
AP - 00248135 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,753.58
AP - 00248135 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 648.74
AP - 00248135 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 129.68
AP - 00248135 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 119.60
AP - 00248135 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 234.20
AP - 00248135 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 243.02
AP - 00248135 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 61.40
AP - 00248135 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 710.48
AP - 00248135 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 279.56
AP - 00248135 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 434.54
AP - 00248135 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 316.16
AP - 00248135 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 33.68
AP - 00248135 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 646.22
AP - 00248135 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 607.16
AP - 00248135 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 150.86
AP - 00248135 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 183.62
AP - 00248135 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 147.08
AP - 00248135 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 221.66
AP - 00248135 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 122.12
AP - 00248135 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 127.16
AP - 00248135 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 192.68
AP - 00248135 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 214.10
AP - 00248135 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 440.84
AP - 00248135 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 95.42
AP - 00248135 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 51.32
AP - 00248135 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 128.18
AP - 00248135 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 31.52
AP - 00248135 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 51.32
AP - 00248135 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 237.93 .
AP - 00248135 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,582.66
AP - 00248135 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 6,191.43
AP - 00248135 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 55.20
AP - 00248135 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 999.67
AP - 00248135 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 159.86
AP - 00248135 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 338.78
AP - 00248135 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 7078
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 13 Current Date: 02/28/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 15:50:5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
2/]4/2007 through 2/27/2007
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00248135 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 777.53
AP - 00248135 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 582.10
AP - 00248135 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 191.36
AP - 00248135 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 55.20
AP - 00248135 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 39.98
AP - 00248135 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 44.12
AP - 00248135 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 137.18
AP - 00248136 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 25.00
AP - 00248136 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 25.00
AP - 00248136 2/14/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 25.00
AP - 00248137 2/15/2007 MILD, GWENDOLOYN 500.00
AP - 00248139 2/2]/2007 A AND A AUTOMOTIVE 541.88
AP - 00248140 2/21/2007 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 42.90
AP - 00248141 2/21/2007 ABC LOCKSMITHS 33.94
AP - 00248141 2/21/2007 ABC LOCKSMITHS 27382
AP - 00248141 2/21/2007 ABC LOCKSMITHS 62.50
AP - 00248142 2/21/2007 ABLAC 217.58
AP - 00248143 2/21/2007 ACTION AWARDS INC. 108.00
AP - 00248143 2/21/2007 ACTION AWARDS INC. 108.00
AP - 00248144 2/21/2007 ACTIVE WALLACE GROUP 2,000.00
AP - 00248146 2/21/2007 AED INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC. 307.39
AP - 00248147 2/21/2007 AEF SYSTEMS CONSULTING INC 787.50
AP - 00248148 2/21/2007 AIRGAS SAFETY 247.11
AP - 00248148 2/21/2007 AIRGAS SAFETY -14.55
AP - 00248150 2/21/2007 ALL CITIES TOOLS 43.05
AP - 00248150 2/21/2007 ALL CITIES TOOLS 490.00
AP - 00248151 2/21/2007 ALPHAGRAPHICS 592.63
AP - 00248151 2/21/2007 ALPHAGRAPHICS 45.26
AP - 00248152 2/21/2007 ALTA FIRE EQUIPMENT CO 318.01
AP - 00248153 2/21/2007 AMAZON.COM CREDIT 23.94
AP - 00248154 2/21/2007 AMERICAN BUILDING MAINTENANCE CO 1,140.39
AP - 00248154 2/21/2007 AMERICAN BUILDING MAINTENANCE CO 1,314.61
AP - 00248154 2/21/2007 AMERICAN BUILDING MAINTENANCE CO 541.29
AP - 00248154 2/21/2007 AMERICAN BUILDING MAINTENANCE CO 884.09
AP - 00248154 2/21/2007 AMERICAN BUILDING MAINTENANCE CO 1,085.04
AP - 00248154 2/21/2007 AMERICAN BUILDING MAINTENANCE CO 1,15558
AP - 00248154 2/21/2007 AMERICAN BUILDING MAINTENANCE CO 218.48
AP - 00248154 2/21/2007 AMERICAN BUILDING MAINTENANCE CO 980.29
AP - 00248154 2/21/2007 AMERICAN BUILDING MAINTENANCE CO 149.79
AP - 00248154 2/2 V2007 AMERICAN BUILDING MAINTENANCE CO 49,162.1 I
AP - 00248155 2/21/2007 AMERICAN ROTARY BROOM CO. INC. 1,051.08
AP - 00248155 2/21/2007 AMERICAN ROTARY BROOM CO. INC. 346.74
AP - 00248]55 2/21/2007 AMERICAN ROTARY BROOM CO. INC. 90.28
AP - 00248156 2/21/2007 AMERICAN WINDOW FASHIONS 64].11
AP - 00248157 2/21/2007 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 195.97
AP - 00248158 2/21/2007 APPLIED METERING TECHNOLOGIES INC 9,021.25
AP - 00248159 2/21/2007 ARBOR NURSERY PLUS 140.08
AP - 00248159 2/21 /2007 ARBOR NURSERY PLUS 193.95
AP - 00248159 2/21/2007 ARBOR NURSERY PLUS 241.36
AP - 00248160 2/21/2007 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 3,603.60
AP - 00248160 2/21/2007 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 5,418.00
AP - 00248160 2/21/2007 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 2,925.00
AP - 00248160 2/21/2007 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 7,485.72
AP - 00248161 2/21/2007 ASSI SECURITY 835.00
P20
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 14 Current Date: 02/28/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:50:5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
2/14/2007 through 2/27/2007
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00248161 2/21/2007 ASSI SECURITY 14,613.75
AP - 00248161 2/21/2007 ASSI SECURITY 9,742.50
AP - 00248162 2/2]/2007 .ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS INC 17,663.00
AP - 00248162 2/21/2007 ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS INC 2,777.00
AP - 00248163 2/21/2007 ASSOCIATED GROUP 2,131.59
AP - 00248164 2/21/2007 ASTRUM UTILITY SERVICES 1,270.40
AP - 00248164 2/21/2007 ASTRUM UTILITY SERVICES 7,214.60
AP - 00248165 2/21/2007 AUDIO EDITIONS 8.58
AP - 00248166 2/21/2007 AURORA'S GOLDEN MOMENTS 3,879.00
AP - 00248167 2/21/2007 B & M LAWN AND GARDEN CENTER 30.77
AP - 00248168 2/21/2007 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 7727
AP - 00248168 2/21/2007 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 210.58
AP - 00248168 2/21/2007 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 54.68
AP - 00248168 2/21/2007 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 68.88
AP - 00248168 2/21/2007 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 66.57
AP - 00248169 2/21/2007 BARNES AND NOBLE 719.68
AP - 00248169 2/21/2007 BARNES AND NOBLE 329.24
AP - 00248169 2/21/2007 BARNES AND NOBLE 152.27
AP - 00248169 2/21/2007 BARNES AND NOBLE 173.35
AP - 00248170 2/21/2007 BBC AUDIOBOOKS AMERICA 19.50
AP - 00248171 2/21/2007 BEAR STATE PUMP AND EQUIPMENT CORPOR 27223
AP - 00248172 2/21/2007 BERG DVM, CHRISTOPHER 437.50
AP - 00248175 2/21/2007 BETTER ROADS MAGAZINE 24.95
AP - 00248176 2/21/2007 BLAZER, TAWNY 500.00
AP - 00248177 2/21/2007 BLIND, RUSSEL 25.00
AP - 00248178 2/21/2007 BOHRER DVM, SUSAN 3,495.00
AP-00248178 2/21/2007 BOHRERDVM,SUSAN 7,037.50
AP - 00248179 2/21/2007 BOLTON; HEATHER 42.68
AP - 00248180 2/21/2007 BONGARDE HOLDINGS INC. 211.70
AP - 00248181 2/21/2007 BRODART BOOKS 357.78
AP - 00248181 2/21/2007 BRODART BOOKS 788.82
AP - 00248181 2/21/2007 BRODART BOOKS 1,320.00
AP - 00248181 2/21/2007 BRODART BOOKS 1,320.00
AP - 00248182 2/21/2007 BROWN, DEBBIE 2,000.00
AP - 00248183 2/21/2007 BUCKNER, DAWNESHA 150.00
AP - 00248184 2/21/2007 BUREAU OF ADMINISTRATION 500.00
AP - 00248185 2/21/2007 CALIFORNIA ANIMAL CONTROL DIRECTORS A 150.00
AP - 00248186 2/21/2007 CALIFORNIA CONCRETE CLEANING INC. 950.00
AP - 00248187 2/21/2007 CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC ENTRY 254.84
AP - 00248188 2/21/2007 CALIFORNIA LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 120.00
AP - 00248189 2/21/2007 CALIFORNIA PEACE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION 65.00
AP - 00248190 2/21/2007 CALIFORNIA PEACE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION 399.00
AP - 00248191 2/21/2007 CALIFORNIA STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 126.88
AP - 00248192 2/21/2007 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 25.00
AP - 00248193 2/21/2007 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 75.00
AP - 00248194 2/21/2007 CALSENSE 836.02
AP - 00248194 2/21/2007 CALSENSE 268.00
AP - 00248194 2/21!2007 CALSENSE 154.00
AP-00248194 2/21/2007 CALSENSE 1,105.24
AP - 00248195 2/21/2007 CAR CARE & TRANSMISSION PRO 37.83
AP - 00248195 2/21/2007 CAR CARE & TRANSMISSION PRO 387.76
AP - 00248195 2/21/2007 CAR CARE & TRANSMISSION PRO 35.14
AP - 00248196 2/21/2007 CARDENAS, SERGIO 10.00
AP - 00248197 2/21/2007 CENTRAL CITIES SIGNS INC 53.88
P21
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 15 Current Date: 02/28/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 15:50:5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P22
Aeenda Check Register
2/14/2007 through 2/27/2007
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00248197 2/21/2007 CENTRAL CITIES SIGNS INC 407.30
AP - 00248197 2/21/2007 CENTRAL CITIES SIGNS INC 164.86
AP - 00248197 2/21/2007 CENTRAL CITIES SIGNS INC 377.13
AP - 00248197 2/21/2007 CENTRAL CITIES SIGNS INC 139.54
AP - 00248198 2/21/2007 CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT 6,858.00
AP - 00248199 2/21/2007 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 43:15
AP - 00248200 2/21/2007 CHANTS, COLLEEN 74.00
AP - 00248201 2/21/2007 CHILD CARE DEPOT 28,101.18
AP - 00248202 2/21/2007 CITY RENTALS 457.87
AP - 00248202 2/21/2007 CITY RENTALS 150.25
AP - 00248203 2/21/2007 CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. 263.90
AP - 00248203 2/21/2007 CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. 32.55
AP - 00248203 2/21/2007 CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. 6.56
AP - 00248203 2/21/2007 CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. 441.72
AP - 00248204 2/21/2007 CLASS ACTS ON TOUR 3,200.00
AP - 00248205 2/21/2007 COAST FULFILLMENT CORP. 527.20
AP - 00248206 2/21/2007 CODI 75.00
AP - 00248207 2/21/2007 COMMERCIAL SERVICES GROUP INC. 61.00
AP - 00248208 2/21/2007 CONEY, CRISTY 223.00
AP - 00248210 2/21/2007 COPIES & INK PRINTING INC. 38.75
AP - 00248210 2/21/2007 COPIES & INK PRINTING INC. 72.49
AP - 00248210 2/21/2007 COPIES & INK PRINTING INC. 3,543.02
AP - 00248210 2/21/2007 COPIES & INK PRINTING INC. 342.47
AP - 00248210 2/21/2007 COPIES R INK PRINTING INC. 38.75
AP - 00248210 2/21/2007 COPIES & INK PRINTING INC. 106.24
AP - 00248211 2/21/2007 COPP CRUSHING CORP, DAN 57.00
AP - 00248211 2/21/2007 COPP CRUSHING CORD, DAN 114.00
AP - 00248212 2/21/2007 CP CONSTRUCTION 500.00
AP - 00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 264.44
AP - 00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 57.62
AP - 00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 124.58
AP - 00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 50.06
AP - 00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 144.74
AP - 00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,431.29
AP - 00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 130.36
AP - 00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 39.98
AP - 00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 47.20
AP - 00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 74.00
AP - 00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 106.94
AP - 00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 666.80
AP - 002482]5 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 666.80
AP - 00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,665.25
AP - 00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,480.99
AP - 00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 584.42
AP - 00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 127.10
AP - 00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 163.70
AP - 00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 34.04
AP - 00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 85.58
AP - 00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 48.80
AP - 002482]5 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 227.72
AP - 00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 36.20
AP - 00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 101.72
AP - 00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 279.44
AP - 00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 176.24
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 16 Current Date: 02/28/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_R EG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 15:50:5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Resister
2/14/2007 through 2/27/2007
Check No. Check Date Vender Name Amount
AP-00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGAVALLEYWATERDISTRICT 186.32
AP - 00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 183.86
AP - 00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1 ] 6.47
AP - 00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1 ] 6.47
AP - 00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 123.32
AP - 00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 197.66
AP - 00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 153.62
AP - 00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 93.14
AP - 00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 128.42
AP - 00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT ]29.62
AP - 00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 225.20
AP - 00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 162.20
AP - 00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 190.16
AP - 00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 96.68
AP - 00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 250.64
AP - 00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 194.96
AP - 00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 187.40
AP - 00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 110.72
AP - 00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 106.76
AP - 00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 109.28
AP - 00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 224.12
AP - 00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 95.42
AP - 00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 139.70
AP - 00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 192.62
AP - 00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 69.52
AP - 00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,217.98
AP = 00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 868.33
AP - 00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 530.36
AP - 00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 208.82
AP - 00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 358.76
AP - 00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 139.76
AP - 00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 187.64
AP - 00248215 2/2]/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 170.00
AP - 00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 110.78
AP - 00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 138.50
AP - 00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 211.58
AP - 00248215 2/2]/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 128.42
AP - 00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 220.34
AP - 00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 147.26
AP - 00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 513.98
AP - 00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 206.30
AP - 00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 85.34
AP - 00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 82.82
AP - 00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 99.44
AP - 00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 100.70
AP - 00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 47.20
AP - 00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 130.36
AP - 00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 275.78
AP - 00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 51.68
AP - 00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 157.40
AP - 00248215 2/21/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 53.84
AP - 00248217 2/21/2007 D 3 EQUIPMENT 49.59
AP - 00248217 2/21/2007 D 3 EQUIPMENT 174.94
AP - 00248218 2/21/2007 DAISY WHEEL RIBBON CO 1NC 261.61
P23
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 17 Current Date: 02/28/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 15:50:5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P24
Agenda Check Register
2/14/2007 through 2/27/2007
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 002482]8 2/2]/2007 DAISY WHEEL RIBBON CO INC 272.19
AP - 00248218 2/21/2007 DAISY WHEEL RIBBON CO INC 5,035.72
AP - 00248219 2/21/2007 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 53,780.00
AP - 00248221 2/21/2007 DEMCO INC 220.72
AP - 00248221 2/21/2007 DEMCO INC 96.02
AP - 00248221 2/21/2007 DEMCO INC 287.75
AP - 00248222 2/21/2007 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 1,600.00
AP - 00248222 2/21/2007 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 2,032.00
AP - 00248223 2/21/2007 DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES 22.23
AP - 00248224 2/21/2007 DFM ASSOCIATES 51.48
AP - 00248225 2/21/2007 DMJM HARRIS 16,326.25
AP - 00248226 2/21/2007 DREAMSHAPERS 350.00
AP - 00248227 2/21 /2007 DTSC 30.00
AP - 00248228 2/21/2007 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 303.08
AP - 00248228 2/21/2007 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 57.73
AP - 00248228 2/21/2007 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 516.29
AP - 00248228 2/21/2007 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION -271.35
AP - 00248229 2/21/2007 EDFUND 65.08
AP - 00248230 2/21 /2007 EL MONTE AUTO PAINT 92.99
AP - 00248231 2/21/2007 ELEPHANT SET-STUDIO SCENERY 7,500.00
AP - 00248232 2/21/2007 EMCOR SERVICE 8,752.25
AP - 00248233 2/21/2007 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1,578.00
AP - 00248234 2/21/2007 EXPERIAN 50.00
AP - 00248235 2/21/2007 FAIRMONT HOSPITALITY INC 15;000.00
AP - 00248236 2/21/2007 FASTENAL COMPANY 246.12
AP - 00248236 2/21/2007 FASTENAL COMPANY 20.12
AP - 00248237 2/21/2007 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 15.53
AP - 00248237 2/21/2007 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 15.29
AP - 00248237 2/21/2007 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 15.29
AP - 00248237 2/21/2007 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 15.29
AP - 00248237 2/21/2007 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 15.29
AP - 00248237 2/21/2007 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 15.29
AP - 00248237 2/21/2007 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 15.29
AP - 00248238 2/21/2007 FEDEX KINKO'S OFFICE AND PRINT SERVICES 199.24
AP - 00248239 2/21/2007 FENCE CRAFT OF UPLAND INC 175.03
AP - 00248240 2/21/2007 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 420.00
AP - 00248240 2/21/2007 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 813.75
AP - 00248240 2/21/2007 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 2,200.00
AP - 00248240 2/21/2007 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 1,500.00
AP - 00248242 2/21/2007 FOOTHILL LAWNMOWER 96.95
AP - 00248243 2/21/2007 FOREMOST 2,631.79
AP - 00248244 2/21/2007 FREDRICS, HEATHER 17.25
AP - 00248245 2/2 ] /2007 GAIL MATERIALS 1,045.53
AP - 00248246 2/21/2007 GALLS INC 53.82
AP - 00248247 2/21/2007 GAMBLE PUPPET PRODUCTIONS, JIM 1,500.00
AP - 00248248 2/21/2007 GANG, JEE SUN 65.00
AP - 00248249 2/21/2007 GAPPCO LLC 57,060.00
AP - 00248251 2/21/2007 GIRON, SABION 15.00
AP - 00248252 2/21/2007 GLOBAL PRESENTER 851.23
AP-00248253 2/21/2007 GOLF VENTURES WEST 98.17
AP-00248253 2/21/2007 GOLF VENTURES WEST 23.33
AP - 00248253 2/21/2007 GOLF VENTURES WEST 531.05
AP-00248253 2/21/2007 GOLF VENTURES WEST -153.77
AP - 00248254 2/21/2007 GOODLING, IRENE 500.00
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 18 Current Date: 02/28/200
ReporCCK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:50:5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P25
Agenda Check Register
2/14/2007 through 2/27/2007
Check No. Check llate Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00248255 2/21/2007 GRAINGER 113.43
AP - 00248255 2/2!/2007 GRAINGER 337.63
AP - 00248255 2/21/2007 GRAINGER 102.15
AP - 00248255 2/21/2007 GRAINGER -549.53
AP - 00248255 2/21/2007 GRAINGER 296.32
AP - 00248255 2/21/2007 GRAINGER 569.35
AP - 00248255 2/21 /2007 GRAINGER 62.99
AP - 00248255 2/21/2007 GRAINGER 80.97
AP - 00248255 2/21/2007 GRAINGER 98.83
AP - 00248255 2/21/2007 GRAINGER 159.79
AP - 00248255 2/21/2007 GRAINGER 57.60
AP - 00248255 2/21/2007 GRAINGER 212.86
AP - 00248255 2/21/2007 GRAINGER 488.75
AP - 00248255 2/21/2007 GRAINGER -488.75
AP - 00248257 2/21/2007 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 119.12
AP - 00248259 2/21/2007 GUTIERREZ, CONNIE 250.00
AP - 00248260 2/21/2007 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO 259.39
AP - 00248261 2/21/2007 HANSON, BARRYE 1,440.00
AP - 00248262 2/21/2007 HAWKE, TERRY NOBLE 81.00
AP - 00248263 2/21/2007 HCS CUTLER STEEL CO 265.83
AP - 00248263 2/21/2007 HCS CUTLER STEEL CO -150.61
AP - 00248263 2/21/2007 HCS CUTLER STEEL CO 218.64
AP - 00248264 2/21/2007 HENDERSON, ANTONIA 750.00
AP - 00248265 2/21/2007 HETZEL, JILL 40.00
AP - 00248266 2/21/2007 HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC 135.88
AP - 00248266 2/21/2007 HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC 33.80
AP - 00248266 2/21/2007 HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC ] 93.85
AP - 00248266 2/21/2007 HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC 188.56
AP - 00248268 2/21/2007 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 379.28
AP - 00248268 2/21/2007 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 217.12
AP - 00248268 2/21/2007 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 416.40
AP - 00248268 2/21/2007 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 82.97
AP - 00248268 2/21/2007 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 61.42
AP - 00248269 2/21/2007 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 99.26
AP - 00248270 2/21/2007 HOSE MAN INC 6.66
AP - 00248270 2/2]/2007 HOSE MAN INC 64.43
AP - 00248270 2/21/2007 HOSE MAN INC -62.93
AP - 00248270 2/21/2007 HOSE MAN INC 5.68
AP - 00248271 2/21/2007 HOT SHOTS ATHLETIC APPAREL INC 26.47
AP - 00248272 2/21/2007 HOUSE OF RUTH 465.19
AP - 00248273 2/21/2007 HOYT LUMBER CO., SM 35.34
AP - 00248273 2/21/2007 HOYT LUMBER CO., SM 8.67
AP - 00248274 2/2]/2007 HUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN BERNARDINO VALI 125.00
AP - 00248275 2/21/2007 HURST, CHERYL 288.50
AP - 00248276 2/21/2007 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 28847
AP - 00248276 2/21/2007 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 74.47
AP - 00248276 2/21/2007 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 82.89
AP - 00248276 2/21/2007 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 695.21
AP - 00248276 2/21/2007 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 526.64
AP - 00248277 2/21/2007 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY INC 5.63
AP - 00248277 2/21/2007 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY INC 57.77
AP - 00248277 2/21/2007 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY INC 39.35
AP - 00248278 2/21/2007 INDEPENDENT ELECTRONICS 85.50
AP - 00248279 2/21/2007 INDUSTRIAL TRAINING SERVICES INC 870.00
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 19 Current Date: 02/28/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:50:5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P2g
Agenda Check Register
2/14/2007 through 2/27/2007
Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00248280 2/21/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 693.60
AP - 00248280 2/2]/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 350.00
AP - 00248280 2/21/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 350.00
AP - 00248280 2/21/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 163.75
AP - 00248280 2/21/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 128.75
AP - 00248280 2/21/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 235.00
AP - 00248280 2/21/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 108.75
AP - 00248280 2/21/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN . 308.75
AP - 00248280 2/21/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 245.00
AP - 00248280 2/21/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 105.00
AP - 00248280 2/21/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 216.25
AP - 00248280 2/21/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 245.00
AP - 00248280 2/21/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 252.50
AP - 00248280 2/21/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 131.25
AP - 00248280 2/2]/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 810.00
AP - 00248280 2/21/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 752.50
AP - 00248280 2/21/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 253.75
AP - 00248280 2/21/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 341.25
AP - 00248280 2/21/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 693.60
AP - 00248280 2/21/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 129.60
AP - 00248281 2/21/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 87.60
AP - 00248281 2/21/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 87.60
AP - 00248281 2/21/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 87.60
AP - 00248282 2/21/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 453.25
AP - 00248283 2/21/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 328.35
AP - 00248283 2/21/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 336.00
AP - 00248284 2/21/2007 JACKSON HIRSH INC 80.00
AP - 00248284 2/21/2007 JACKSON HIRSH INC 9.25
AP - 00248285 2/21/2007 JOBS AVAILABLE INC 30.00
AP - 00248286 2/21/2007 JOHNSON, DENISE 200.00
AP - 00248287 2/21/2007 KELLY BLUE BOOK 60.00
AP - 00248287 2/21/2007 KELLY BLUE BOOK 64.35
AP - 00248287 2/21/2007 KELLY BLUE BOOK 60.06
AP - 00248287 2/21/2007 KELLY BLUE BOOK 60.06
AP - 00248287 2/21/2007 KELLY BLUE BOOK 60.06
AP - 00248287 2/21/2007 KELLY BLUE BOOK 64.35
AP - 00248288 2/21/2007 KIM, SEO 30.00
AP - 00248289 2/21/2007 KLAUS AND SONS 6,600.00
AP - 00248291 2/21/2007 KONE INC 410.00
AP - 00248292 2/21/2007 KRAKOWER & ASSOCIATES 450.00
AP - 00248293 2/21/2007 LANE, NICOLE 350.00
AP - 00248294 2/21/2007 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 318.07
AP - 00248295 2/21/2007 LEWIS, YVONNE 725.00
AP - 00248300 2/21/2007 MACIEL, ASUNCION 250.00
AP - 00248302 2/21/2007 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 1,864.78
AP - 00248302 2/21/2007 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 15,457.12
AP - 00248302 2/21/2007 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 6,356.26
AP - 00248302 2/21/2007 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 2,920.26
AP - 00248302 2/21/2007 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 4,888.00
AP - 00248302 2/2]/2007 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 1,141.87
AP - 00248302 2/21 /2007 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 841.29
AP - 00248302 2/21/2007 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 567.67
AP - 00248302 2/21/2007 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 533.20
AP - 00248302 2/21/2007 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 3,854.59
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 20 Current Date: 02/28/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:50:5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Ret=ister
2/14/2007 through 2/27/2007
Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00248302 2/21/2007 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 5,317.37
AP - 00248302 2/21/2007 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 1,846.77
AP - 00248302 2/21/2007 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC ]0,306.1 I
AP - 00248302 2/21/2007 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 3.626.98
AP - 00248302 2/21/2007 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 19,805.53
AP - 00248302 2/21/2007 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 136.74
AP - 00248302 2/21/2007 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 9,388.48
AP - 00248303 2/21/2007 MARK CHRISTOPHER INC 3.49
AP - 00248304 2/21/2007 MARTENS, LINDSAY 46.23
AP - 00248305 2/21/2007 MCCLINTOCK, RONDALYNNE 300.00
AP - 00248307 2/21/2007 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 76.96
AP - 00248307 2/21/2007 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 32.60
AP~- 00248307 2/21/2007 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 138.85
AP - 00248307 2/21/2007 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 325.60
AP - 00248307 2/2]/2007 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 32.60
AP - 00248308 2/21/2007 MIDWEST TAPE 191.91
AP - 00248308 2/21/2007 MIDWEST TAPE 191.91
AP - 00248308 2/21/2007 MIDWEST TAPE 136.94
AP - 00248308 2/21/2007 MIDR'EST TAPE 153.93
AP - 00248308 2/21/2007 MIDWEST TAPE 133.94
AP - 00248308 2/21/2007 MIDWEST TAPE 133.94
AP - 00248308 2/21/2007 MIDWEST TAPE 183.92
AP - 00248308 2/21/2007 MIDWEST TAPE 283.90
AP - 00248308 2/21/2007 MIDWEST TAPE 80.96
AP - 00248308 2/2]/2007 MIDWEST TAPE 80.96
AP - 00248309 2/21/2007 MORI, JOHNNY 750.00
AP - 00248310 2/21/2007 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 49.19
AP - 00248311 2/21/2007 NAPA AUTO PARTS 49.00
AP - 00248311 2/21/2007 NAPA AUTO PARTS 47.37
AP - 00248312 2/21/2007 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS 143.52
AP - 00248313 2/21/2007 NATIONAL DEFERRED 30,626.59
AP - 00248314 2/21/2007 NATIONAL PEN CORPORATION 59.07
AP - 00248315 2/21/2007 NBS 16,407.36
AP - 00248317 2/21/2007 OCLC INC 44.34
AP - 00248319 2/21/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 160.98
AP - 00248319 2/21/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 35.00
AP - 00248319 2/21/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 31.45
AP - 00248319 2/21/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 14.85
AP - 00248319 2/21/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 193.94
AP - 00248319 2/21/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 15.37
AP - 00248319 2/21/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 55.01
AP - 00248319 2/21/2007 OFFICE DEPOT ] 97.93
AP - 00248319 2/21/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 38.80
AP - 00248319 2/21/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 31.31
AP - 00248319 2/21/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 65.43
AP - 00248319 2/21/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 52.10
AP - 00248319 2/21/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 4.39
AP - 00248319 2/21/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 34.]4
AP - 00248319 2/21/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 28.17
AP - 00248319 2/21/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 231.82
AP - 00248319 2/21/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 72.10
AP - 00248319 2/21/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 10.]8
AP - 00248319 2/21/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 275.75
AP - 00248319 2/21/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 32.63
P27
User: VL.OPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 21 Current Date: 02/28/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pornait Layout Time: 15:50:5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P28
Agenda Check Register
2/14/2007 through 2/27/2007
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00248319 2/21/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 84.86
AP - 002483]9 2/21/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 30.92
AP - 00248319 2/21/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 15.87
AP - 00248319 2/21/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 304.44
AP - 00248319 2/21/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 1,558.17
AP - 00248319 2/21/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 6.48
AP - 00248319 2/21/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 4.02
AP - 00248319 2/21/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 77 73
AP - 00248319 2/2 ] /2007 OFFICE DEPOT 80.69
AP - 00248319 2/21/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 231.63
AP - 00248319 2/21/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 43.20
AP - 00248319 2/21/2007 OFFICE DEPOT -28.41
AP - 00248319 2/21/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 717
AP - 00248319 2/21/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 12.82
AP - 00248319 2/21 /2007 OFFICE DEPOT 79.30
AP - 00248319 2/21/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 135.40
AP - 00248319 2/21/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 38.55
AP - 00248319 2/21/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 1,010.48
AP - 00248319 2/21/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 99.56
AP - 00248319 2/21/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 66.91
AP - 00248319 2/21/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 406.61
AP - 00248319 2/21/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 26.17
AP - 00248319 2/21/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 74.12
AP - 00248319 2/21/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 9.34
AP - 00248319 2/21/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 43.96
AP - 00248319 2/2 ] /2007 OFFICE DEPOT 43.21
AP - 00248319 2/21/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 140.59
AP - 00248319 2/21/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 31.68
AP - 00248319 2/21/2007 OFFICE DEPOT -2771
AP - 00248319 2/21/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 102.70
AP - 00248319 2/21 /2007 OFFICE DEPOT 86.24
AP - 00248319 2/21/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 27.62
AP - 00248319 2/2 V2007 OFFICE DEPOT 87.57
AP - 00248319 2/21 /2007 OFFICE DEPOT 10.60
AP - 00248319 2/21/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 46.05
AP - 00248319 2/21/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 23.71
AP - 00248319 2/21/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 140.51
AP - 00248319 2/21/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 33.75
AP-002483]9 2/21/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 44.97
AP - 00248319 2/21/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 62.65
AP - 00248319 2/21/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 129.69
AP - 00248319 2/21/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 118.53
AP - 00248320 2/21/2007 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 1,394.29
AP - 00248321 2/21/2007 ONTARIO, CITY OF 16,628.06
AP - 00248322 2/21/2007 ORONA, PATRICIA 195.00
AP - 00248322 2/21/2007 ORONA, PATRICIA 130.00
AP - 00248323 2/2]/2007 ORR, PAUL 6.00
AP - 00248324 2/21/2007 PACIFIC PLUMBING SPECIALTIES 368.24
AP - 00248325 2/21/2007 PAL CAMPAIGN 132.39
AP - 00248326 2/21/2007 PARTNERSHIP, THE 1,000.00
AP - 00248327 2/21/2007 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 249.49
AP - 00248327 2/21!2007 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 229.81
AP - 00248328 2/21/2007 PFEIFER, MARJORIE 5.00
AP - 00248329 2/21/2007 PHONG, BRYAN 150.00
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 22 Current Date: 02/28/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_ REG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pornait Layout Time: 15:50:5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ppg
Agenda Check Register
2/14/2007 through 2/27/2007
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00248330 2/21/2007 PILONIETA, MANUEL 364.31
AP - 00248330 2/2]/2007 PILONIETA, MANUEL -200.00
AP - 00248331 2/21/2007 PITNEY BOWES 206.88
AP - 00248332 2/21/2007 POSAUEK, COREE RAY 500.00
AP - 00248333 2/21/2007 POSTER SOLUTIONS 80.00
AP - 00248333 2/21/2007 POSTER SOLUTIONS 15.95
AP - 00248334 2/21/2007 POUK AND STEINLE INC. 14,472.39
AP - 00248334 2/21/2007 POUK AND STEEVLE INC. 19,990.00
AP - 00248335 2/21/2007 PRAISE CHAPEL CENTER HOPE CHURCH 500.00
AP - 00248336 2/21/2007 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION INC 86.39
AP - 00248337 2/21/2007 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 307.50
AP - 00248338 2/21/2007 QUINTANA, ZITA 193.00
AP - 00248339 2/21/2007 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMME] 200.00
AP - 00248340 2/21/2007 RANDOM HOUSE INC 38.82
AP - 00245340 2/21/2007 RANDOM HOUSE INC 7764
AP - 00248340 2/2]/2007 RANDOM HOUSE INC 66.21
AP - 00248340 2/21/2007 RANDOM HOUSE INC 343.30
AP - 00248340 2/21/2007 RANDOM HOUSE INC 146.22
AP - 00248340 2/21/2007 RANDOM HOUSE INC 81.73
AP - 00248341 2/21/2007 RAULS AUTO TRIM INC 24888
AP - 00248342 2/21/2007 RECORDED BOOKS LLC 7.49
AP - 00248342 2/21/2007 RECORDED BOOKS LLC 14.98
AP - 00248342 2/21/2007 RECORDED BOOKS LLC 17.14
AP - 00248343 2/21/2007 REEVES, BRANDI 40.00
AP - 00248344 2/21/2007 REMEDY 114.05
AP - 00248346 2/21/2007 RODGERS AND HAMMERSTEIN THEATRE LIBR 150.00
AP - 00248347 2/21/2007 RODRIGUEZ, SONNY 64.00
AP - 00248347 2/21/2007 RODRIGUEZ, SONNY 140.00
AP - 00248348 2!21/2007 ROTARY CORPORATION 32.24
AP - 00248348 2/21/2007 ROTARY CORPORATION 657.36
AP - 00248349 2/2]/2007 ROWE, CARL 180.00
AP - 00248350 2/21/2007 ROWE; TIA LACHELLE 500.00
AP - 00248352 2/21/2007 SAFEWAY SIGN COMPANY 8,754.86
AP - 00248353 2/21/2007 SALAZAR, BERTHA 100.00
AP - 00248354 2/21/2007 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 21.03
AP - 00248354 2/21/2007 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 22.03
AP - 00248355 2/21/2007 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 247.00
AP - 00248355 2!21/2007 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 192.00
AP - 00248355 2/21/2007 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 247.00
AP - 00248356 2/21/2007 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT -494,458.50
AP - 00248356 2/21/2007 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT 27,651.25
AP - 00248356 2/21/2007 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT 121,477.94
AP - 00248356 2/21/2007 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT 291,653.93
AP - 00248356 2/21/2007 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT 3,524.76
AP - 00248356 2/21/2007 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT 1,858,621.75
AP - 00248357 2/21/2007 SAWA 175.00
AP - 00248358 2/21/2007 SCOTT, DIANA 375.00
AP - 00248359 2/21/2007 SECC CORP 5;000.00
AP - 00248360 2/21/2007 SESAC INC 1,155.00
AP - 00248361 2/21/2007 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 135.00
AP - 00248362 2/21/2007 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 154.54
AP - 00248364 2/21/2007 SMITH PIPE AND SUPPLY INC 50.60
AP - 00248364 2/21/2007 SMITH PIPE AND SUPPLY INC 7.76
AP - 00248365 2/21/2007 SO CAL EQUIPMENT 504.22
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 23 Current Date: 02/28/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_R EG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:50:5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
2/14/2007 through 2/27/2007
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00248365 2/21/2007 SO CAL EQUIPMENT 969.75
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 784.85
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.35
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.03
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.38
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.21
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.55
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.38
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.06
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.24
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 134.95
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 64.31
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1238
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 80.01
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 55.50
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 145.97
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 60.48
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.24
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 27.65
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 93.18
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 89.38
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1238
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.38
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 6228
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 ~ SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 55.62
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 11.96
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2589
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 11833
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 87.62
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.21
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 11.96
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.56
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 149.48
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 132.12
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.35
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 103.59
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 63.96
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.48
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 81.75
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 73.89
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 259.05
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 132.98
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 28.09
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ]44.66
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 107.47
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 103.65
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.72
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.24
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.56
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 68.64
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 991.64
AP - 00248369 2/2]/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.72
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 88.31
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 52.42
P30
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 24 Current Date: 02/28/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 15:50:5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Resister
2/14/2007 through 2/27/2007
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 152.43
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 93.72
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.24
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 298.17
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 96.45
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.38
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.06
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 344.06
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 7770
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.38
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 649.55
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 58.55
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.38
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.20
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 9.05
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.25
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 74.14
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,297.01
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,240.42
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.74
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 98.51
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.28
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 10,659.52
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN' CALIFORNIA EDISON 286.88
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.24
AP - 00248369 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 59.26
AP - 00248370 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19,429.89
AP - 00248370 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14,055.47
AP - 00248370 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN` CALIFORNIA EDISON 9,025.31
AP - 00248370 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 51,680.59
AP - 00248370 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 4,212.90
AP - 00248370 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,868.67
AP - 00248370 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,727.75
AP - 00248370 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 181.47
AP - 00248370 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 44.24
AP - 00248370 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12,120.96
AP - 00248370 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14,992.80
AP - 00248371 2/21/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL ATHLETE 228.00
AP - 00248372 2/21/2007 SOUTHLAND SPORTS OFFICIALS 830.00
AP - 00248373 2/21/2007 SPARKLETTS 50.53
AP - 00248374 2/21/2007 SPRINT NEXTEL ]92.99
AP - 00248375 2/21/2007 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 33.50
AP - 00248376 2/21/2007 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 175.00
AP - 00248377 2/21/2007 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 200.00
AP - 00248378 2/21/2007 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 310.00
AP - 00248379 2/21/2007 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 213.50
AP - 00248380 2/21/2007 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 420.50
AP - 00248381 2/21/2007 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 271.50
AP - 00248382 2/21/2007 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 250.00
AP - 00248383 2/21/2007 STEELWORKERS OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION 708.33
AP - 00248383 2/21/2007 STEELWORKERS OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION 230.22
AP - 00248384 2/21/2007 STEWART PICTURES, RON 1,000.00
AP - 00248385 2/21/2007 STOFA, JOSEPH 14.00
AP - 00248386 2/21/2007 STRESS LESS ENVIRONMENTAL LLC 1,485.00
P31
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 25 Current Date: 02/28/200
Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 15:50:5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P32
Agenda Check Register
2/14/2007 through 2/27/2007
Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00248387 2/21/2007 SUN, THE 165.60
AP - 00248388 2/21/2007 SUNSHINE GROWERS NURSERY INC 68.53
AP - 00248389 2/21/2007 TANNER RECOGNITION COMPANY, O C 2,326.22
AP - 00248389 2/21/2007 TANNER RECOGNITION COMPANY, O C 216.li
AP - 00248390 2/21/2007 THOMSON GALE 206.55
AP - 00248390 2/21/2007 THOMSON GALE 175.06
AP - 00248390 2/21/2007 THOMSON GALE 151.72
AP - 00248390 2/21/2007 THOMSON GALE 243.34
AP - 00248390 2/21/2007 THOMSON GALE 55.05
AP - 00248390 2/21/2007 THOMSON GALE 29.27
AP - 00248390 2/21/2007 THOMSON GALE 28.40
AP - 00248390 2/21/2007 THOMSON GALE 198.80
AP - 00248390 2/21/2007 THOMSON GALE 58.54
AP - 00248390 2/21/2007 THOMSON GALE 87.81
AP - 00248391 2/21/2007 TINKHAM, ELVIN 250.00
AP - 00248392 2/21/2007 TOBIN, RENEE 33.45
AP - 00248393 2/21/2007 TRAK ENGINEERING INC 1,092.02
AP - 00248394 2/21/2007 TRANS WEST TRUCK CENTER 51.01
AP - 00248394 2/21/2007 TRANS WEST TRUCK CENTER -46.46
AP - 00248395 2/21/2007 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 1,646.41
AP - 00248395 2/21/2007 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 34,562.14
AP - 00248395 2/21/2007 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 981.48
AP - 00248395 2/21/2007 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 9,870.85
AP - 00248395 2/21/2007 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 4,192.89
AP - 00248395 2/21/2007 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 11,704.59
AP - 00248395 2/21/2007 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 9,100.39
AP - 00248396 2/21/2007 TUTOR.COM INC 23,169.00
AP - 00248398 2/21/2007 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 28.94
AP - 00248398 2/21/2007 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 193.77
AP - 00248398 2/21/2007 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 51.42
AP - 00248398 2/21/2007 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 786.59
AP - 00248398 2/21/2007 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 772.03
AP - 00248398 2/21/2007 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 51.42
AP - 00248398 2/21/2007 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 136.79
AP - 00248398 2/21/2007 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 28.94
AP - 00248399 2/21/2007 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P. 2,117.39
AP - 00248400 2/21/2007 UNIQUE CREATIONS 56.57
AP - 00248401 2/21/2007 UNIQUE MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC 855.38
AP - 00248402 2/21/2007 UNITED WAY _ 357.82
AP - 00248403 2/21/2007 UPS 30.07
AP - 00248403 2/21/2007 UPS 32.03
AP - 00248404 2/21/2007 US POSTMASTER 8,500.00
AP - 00248405 2/21/2007 VALLEY CREST NURSERY 797.35
AP - 00248406 2/21/2007 VARNEY, SUSAN 1,000.00
AP - 00248408 2/21/2007 VERIZON 29.03
AP - 00248408 2/21/2007 VERIZON 29.95
AP - 00248408 2/21/2007 VERIZON 19.70
AP - 00248408 2/21/2007 VERIZON 19.70
AP - 00248408 2/21/2007 VERIZON 29.95
AP - 00248408 2/21/2007 VERIZON 21.82
AP - 00248408 2/21/2007 VERIZON 19.70
AP - 00248408 2/21/2007 VERIZON 8977
AP - 00248408 2/21/2007 VERIZON 29.03
AP - 00248408 2/21/2007 VERIZON 8977
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 26 Current Date: 02/28/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 15:50:5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
2/14/2007 through 2/27/2007
Check No. Check Datc Vendor Name
AP - 00248408 2/21/2007 VERIZON
AP-00248408 2/21/2007 VERIZON
AP - 00248408 2/21/2007 VERIZON
AP - 00248408 2/21/2007 VERIZON
AP - 00248408 2/21/2007 VERIZON
AP - 00248408 2/21/2007 VERIZON
AP - 00248408 2/21/2007 VERIZON
AP - 00248408 2/21/2007 VERIZON
AP - 00248408 2/21/2007 VERIZON
AP - 00248408 2/21/2007 VERIZON
AP - 00248408 2/21/2007 VERIZON
AP - 00248408 2/21/2007 VERIZON
AP - 00248408 2/21/2007 VERIZON
AP - 00248408 2/21/2007 VERIZON
AP - 00248409 2/21/2007 VOLM, LIZA
AP - 00248410 2/21/2007 VORTEX INDUSTRIES INC
AP - 00248411 2/21/2007 WATSON PAINTING CORPORATION
AP - 00248412 2/21/2007 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY
AP - 00248412 2/21/2007 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY
AP - 00248412 2/21/2007 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY
AP - 00248413 2/21/2007 WEST COAST TURF
AP - 00248413 2/21/2007 WEST COAST TURF
AP - 00248413 2/21/2007 WEST COAST TURF
AP - 00248413 2/21/2007 WEST COAST TURF
AP - 00248413 2/21/2007 WEST COAST TURF
AP - 00248413 2/21/2007 WEST COAST TURF
AP - 00248413 2/21/2007 WEST COAST TURF
AP - 00248413 2/21/2007 WEST COAST TURF
AP - 00248413 2/21/2007 WEST COAST TURF
AP - 00248413 2/21/2007 WEST COAST TURF
AP - 00248414 2/21/2007 WEST END MATERIAL SUPPLY
AP - 00248415 2/21/2007 WEST PAYMENT CENTER
AP - 00248415 2/21/2007 WEST PAYMENT CENTER
AP - 00248416 2/21/2007 WESTERN HIGHWAY PRODUCTS INC
AP - 00248417 2/21/2007 WESTERN UNIVERSITY
AP - 00248418 2/21/2007 WILLIAMS PHOTOGRAPHY, CHRIS
AP - 00248419 2/21/2007 WORLD BOOK INC
AP-002484]9 2/21/2007 WORLD BOOK INC
AP - 00248420 2/2]/2007 XEROX CORPORATION
Amount
89.77
63.44
89.77
29.68
21.26
29.03
31.56
141.44
21.26
39.85
39.85
34.42
116.09
89.85
112.50
388.98
13,480.00
410.52
225.20
721.35
3,528.00
3,528.00
3,528.00
3,528.00
3,528.00
1,029.00
3,528.00
3,528.00
3,528.00
3,528.00
13.47
883.23
268.27
937.55
325.00
120.00
1,808.06
2,712.05
202.61
Total for Check TD AP: 4,238,602.01
Total for Entity: 4,238,602.0]
P33
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 27 Current Date: 02/28/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 15:50:5
STAFF REPORT
ENGINEERING DEPARTbIENT
Date: March 7, 2007
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
From: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
By: Gary Varney, Maintenance Superintendent
RANCHO
CUCAMONGA
Subject: APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "CITYWIDE WOOD
BARRICADE RETROFIT" AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE THE
"NOTICE INVITING BIDS" TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NUMBER 1025001-
5650/1539025-0 AS APPROVED IN THE FY 06-07 BUDGET
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council approve plans and specifications for the "Citywide Wood
Barricade Retrofit" and authorize the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids" to be funded
from account number 1 025001-56 50/1 53 9025-0 as approved in the FY 06-07 budget.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
A citywide survey was completed in 2006 that identified 35 locations requiring the wood barricades
be replaced due to the aging wood posts and panels at the end of paved streets with new PVC
fencing materials, K markers and N markers. The new PVC material is vandal resistant, durable,
no painting required, no rotting, and minimum maintenance costs. City Staff recommended this
project be contracted out, due to the labor involved in removing wood barricades and replacing with
the new PVC fencing.
Engineer's estimate for this project is $32,000.
Respectfully~submit~ted,
~,~r'/ ~(~ '~
Wi am J. O'Neil
City Engineer
P34
WJO:GV:ju
P35
RESOLUTION NO. O / ' Q 5Q
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAAIONGA APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR CITYWIDE WOOD BARRICADE
RETROFIT AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE
CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council to
construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council has prepared specifications
for the construction of certain improvements.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the specifications presented by the City
of Rancho Cucamonga City Council be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for the
"CITYWIDE WOOD BARRICADE RETROFIT".
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to
advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in
the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following
words and figures, to wit:
"NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS"
Pursuant to a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County,
California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho Cucamonga
City Council will .receive at the OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK IN THE OFFICES OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ON OR BEFORE THE HOUR OF 2:00 P.M. ON April 4,
?007 sealed bids or proposals for "CITYWIDE WOOD BARRICADE RETROFIT" in said City.
Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho
Cucamonga, Califomia, 91730.
Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga
City Council, Califomia, marked, "BID FOR CITYWIDE WOOD BARRICADE RETROFIT."
A Pre-Bid Job Walk is scheduled for March 27, 2007, at 9:00 a.m. at the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Corporate Yard, 9153 Ninth Street, Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia, 91729, where bidders may present
questions regarding the Bid Documents: Plans, Proposals, Specifications.
Resolution No.
Page 2
PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California
Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less
than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which
the public work. is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday
and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of
California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of
such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, 1000 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any
interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to
be posted at the job site.
Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, not more than twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic
employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less
than the genera] prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached
contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provision of said Labor Code.
Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the
employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him.
Section 1777.5, as amended, requires
apprenticable occupation to apply to t
works project and which administers
approval. The certificate will also fix
performance of the contract. The ratio
one to five except:
the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any
re joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public
the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of
the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the
of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than
When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded
an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or
When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or
3. When the trade can -show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through
apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or
4. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his
contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen.
P36
The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of
apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticable trade
on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions.
Resolution No.
Page 3
The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and
1777.6 in the employment of apprentices.
hrformation relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be
obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San
Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices.
Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of
this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by
the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7,
Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended.
The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00)
for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any
subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during
which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in
violation of said Labor Code.
Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work
required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective
bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8.
The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond,
payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (10%) of the
amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is
awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check, certified
check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
If the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the
amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the
difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the
lowest bidder.
The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall
be one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal
to one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment
of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done
by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be
required to furnish a certificate that he tames compensation insurance covering his employees upon
work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho
Cucamonga for the construction of said work.
No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the
City of Rancho Cucamonga.
Contractor shall possess any and all contractors licenses, in form and class as required by any and all
applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; including but
P37
Resolution No.
Page 4
not limited to an "A" (General Engineering Contractor), or "D-42" (Sign Installation), or "C-32"
(Parking and Highway Improvement Contractor). In accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's
License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulation
adopted pursuant thereto.
The Contractor, pursuant to the California Business and Professions Code, Section 7028.15, shall
indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by
the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and
correct.
The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga City Council on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho
Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City
Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of $35.00
(THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS), said $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS) is non-refundable.
Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said
request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional non-reimbursable
payment of $15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead.
The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans
and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may,
upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized
securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention).
The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reject any and all bids.
Questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids for CITYWIDE WOOD BARRICADE RETROFIT
may be directed to:
Ernest Ruiz, Maintenance Supervisor
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
(909) 477-2700, ext. 4108
(909)477-2731, fax
By order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Dated this 7`~ day of March 2007.
ADVERTISE ON: March 13, 2007 and March 20, 2007.
P38
P39
STAFF REPORT
lr:~ct~~rat;;c DFe~Kr~t~r;~r
Date: March 7. 2007
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
From: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
By: Maria E. Perez, Associate Engineer
r~ ~~ ~~ ~
rf`r~~
RANCHO
cUCAMONGA
Subject: APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS"
FOR THE HIGHLAND AVENUE GATES AT HIGHLAND AVENUE EAST OF SAN
BENITO AVENUE AND FAIRMONT WAY NORTH OF KENYON WAY TO BE FUNDED
FROM TRANSPORTATION FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO. 1243035650/1514124-0
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the plans and specifications for the Highland Avenue
Gates at Highland Avenue east of San Benito Avenue and Fairmont Way north of Kenyon Way and
approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids." The
project will be funded from Transportation Funds, Account No. 1243035650/1514124-0.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
This project will install automatic gates and barricades crossing Highland Avenue, east of San Benito
Avenue and Fairmont Way, north of Kenyon Way. The gates will function for emergency vehicles with
the same mechanism as a traffic signal, using an optical preemption device. City Maintenance vehicles
will have access through the gates with a standard remote control switch.
This phase of the project will install gates and barriers to prevent public vehicles from accessing the
closed road. The project has been designed to allow continued use of the area by pedestrians and
bicyclists. The second phase of the project, budgeted for fiscal year 2007/2008 will install landscaping
along the north frontage of the closed street.
The project plans and specifications have been completed and approved by the City Engineer. The
Engineer's estimate is $127,000.00, including a 10% contingency, plus an additional $5,000.00 required
for Construction Administration, which includes advertising, printing, materials testing and survey.
Staff has determined that the project is Categorically Exempt per Article 19, Section 15301(c) of the
CEQA guidelines. Legal advertising is scheduled for March 13, 2007 and March 20, 2007, with a bid
opening at 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, April 3, 2007, unless extended by addenda.
Respectfully submitted
~/ ~ GZt,~t~(
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:MEP
Attachments: Vicinity Map and Resolution
VICINITY MAP
GATES FOR HIGHLAND AVE. CLOSURE
AT HIGHLAND AVE., EAST OF SAN BENITO
AND FAIRMONT WAY, NORTH OF KENYON WAY
PROJECT
LOCATION
~, y > Q
d Q
m
~ p ~
~
~
N a
G
- °~ t'
- ~
~~ .y U 2 _._ Q S. 2
Almond Rd ~
Hillside Rd
-- mco e.
Banyan SY
19th St
;.:~
Base Line R d
F
thill BI ~ '
oo
Arrow Rt
8th St
10 Freeway Q
6t h Sf
-
i Q
o,- ~
~
° i9 vi Q
~ n
_ E ~
~
d ~ m =
= a x
Q
c >,: Q
m
.~.• ~ ~ , ¢
ffi ~ w Q
in m Ti"i ~ L
L m . - W l U, i.
K U ='
D ?
- ase Line Rd
Fdothill Bl
Arrow Rt
I I /8 I I qth St
>
d a'
~ 9 1.0 Freeway
m
s ~
3
~ w
e~m~.
~~ ..
~~?''
Vilson Av
Route 30
Av
I~
x
N
P41
RESOLUTION NO. Q 7' ~ `~ I
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
"HIGHLAND AVENUE GATES AT HIGHLAND AVENUE EAST OF SAN
BENITO AVENUE AND FAIRMONT WAY NORTH OF KENYON WAY"
IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK
TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain .
improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for
the construction of certain improvements.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by
the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for
the "HIGHLAND AVENUE GATES AT HIGHLAND AVENUE EAST OF SAN BENITO AVENUE
AND FAIRMONT WAY NORTH OF KENYON WAY".
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to
advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work
specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be
substantially in the following words and figures, to wit:
"NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS"
Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino
County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho
Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 p.m., on Tuesday, April 3, 2007, sealed bids or
proposals for the "HIGHLAND AVENUE GATES AT HIGHLAND AVENUE EAST OF SAN
BENITO AVENUE AND FAIRMONT WAY NORTH OF KENYON WAY".
Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive,
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730.
Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, California, marked, "HIGHLAND AVENUE GATES AT HIGHLAND AVENUE EAST
OF SAN'BENITO AVENUE AND FAIRMONT WAY NORTH OF KENYON WAY".
PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California
Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not
less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the
locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of
per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of
Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general
prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on
file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive,
Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The
Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site.
P42
RESOLUTION NO.
March 7, 2007
Page 2
Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or
mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or
mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein before stipulated for any
work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of
the provisions of said Labor Code.
Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code
concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him.
Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in
any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of
the public work's project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a
certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will
be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such
cases shall not be less than one to five except:
A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship
committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the
request of certificate, or
B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to
five, or
C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership
through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or
D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices
on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less.than one apprentice to
eight journeymen.
The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of
apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any
apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are
making such contributions.
The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections
1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices.
Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may
be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of
Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and
its branch offices.
Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the
execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with
and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set
forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as
amended.
P43
RESOLUTION NO.
March 7, 2007
Page 3
The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars
($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by
hlm or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work herein before mentioned, for each
calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor
more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code.
Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the
work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the
applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section
17773.8.
The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's
bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least 10% of the
amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the
same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashiers'
check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of
the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference
between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the
lowest bidder.
The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said
work shall be 100% of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to
100% of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any
materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the
Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be
required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees
upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City
of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work.
No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued
by the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
On the date and at the time of the submittal of the Bidder's Proposal the Prime Contractor shall
possess any and all contractor licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable
laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; Including but
not limited to a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) or a combination of
Specialty Class "C" licenses sufficient to cover all the work to be performed by the Prime
Contractor in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California
Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulations adopted
pursuant thereto.
The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code," Section 7028.15,
shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and
be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being
provided is true and correct.
The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho
Cucamonga, California, 91730. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of
P44
RESOLUTION NO.
March 7, 2007
Page 4
the City Engineer, Engineering Counter, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, and payment of $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS), said $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE
DOLLARS) is non refundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and
specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above,
together with an additional non-reimbursable payment of $15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover
the cost of mailing charges and overhead.
The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of-the General Provisions, as set forth in
the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the
Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense,
substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention).
The City of Rancho Cucamonga reserves the right to reject any or all bids.
Questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids for the "HIGHLAND AVENUE GATES AT
HIGHLAND AVENUE EAST OF SAN BENITO AVENUE AND FAIRMONT WAY NORTH OF
KENYON WAY" may be directed to: Maria E. Perez, Associate Engineer at (909) 477-2740, ext.
4036.
By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Dated this 7'"day of March, 2007
Publish Dates: March 13, 2007 and March 20, 2007
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
this 7'h day of March, 2006
Donald J. Kurth, M.D., Mayor
ATTEST:
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk
I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City
Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council
held on the 7'h day of March, 2007.
Executed this 7'h day of March, 2007, at Rancho Cucamonga, California
Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk
ADVERTISE ON: March 13, 2007 and March 20, 2007
STAFF REPORT
ENGINEERING DEPARTI\4ENT
Date: March 7, 2007
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
From: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
By: Cam Amos, Assistant Engineer
RANCxo
C,,UCAMONGA
Subject: RECOMMENDATION TO QUITCLAIM A STORM DRAIN EASEMENT AT
THE INLAND EMPIRE REGIONAL COMPOST FACILITY, LOCATED AT
] 2645 SIXTH STREET. (APN 229-283-61 ;Related File : DRC2003-00097 )
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that City Council adopts the attached resolution quitclaiming the original storm
drain easement.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
Project DRC2003-00097, a Conditional Use Permit for conversion of a wazehouse to a compost
production plant, located at 12645 Sixth Street, west of Etiwanda Avenue in the Heavy Industrial
District (Subarea 15), was approved by the Planning Commission on July 23, 2003. The owner is
the Inland Empire Regional Compost Authority.
The property had an approximately 5 foot diameter public storm drain, in a 15 foot wide public
storm drain easement entering the front of the property and running diagonally across it for several
hundred feet. The existing 410,000 square foot warehouse on the 24 acre property is being
augmented by approximately 40,000 square feet of additional building floor space plus 3 acres of
existing parking lot is undergoing construction as a biofilter, a mechanical air cleaning facility. The
additional structures would interfere with maintenance of the storm drain so a new one is replacing
it, with an acceptable realignment., The owner has granted the City an easement for the new
alignment and the original storm drain has been removed from the easement to be quitclaimed.
The Plamring Commission ruled, on February 28, 2007, that elimination of the original storm drain
easement is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Genera] Plan.
Respectfully//subm/itteod,p
~~ C~~ ~"~
WilYam J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:CBAa1v
P45
Attachment(s) Resolution
Vicinity Map
Proposed Quitclaim, Exhibits A & B
P46
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ENGiNEER1NG DIVISION
NORTH I I 1 "_
ITEM:
TITLE: VICINIT'?~ MAP
EXHIBIT:
P47
RESOLUTION NO. O7"" ~5Z
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FINDING THAT
SAID EASEMENT, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED
HEREIN, TO BE UNNECESSARY, AND AUTHORIZING AND
DIl2ECTING THE CITY ENGINEER AND CITY CLERK TO
EXECUTE THAT CERTAIN DEED, A COPY OF WHICH IS
ATTACHED HERETO AS EXHIBIT "A", AND TO CAUSE
THE SAME TO BE RECORDED.
A. Recitals.
(i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has an easement for storm drain purposes generally
located at 12645 Sixth Street, west of Etiwanda Avenue in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, California, and herein referred to in this
Resolution as "said easement". A full, true, and complete description of said easement is
set forth in Official Record 84-292832, County of San Bernardino.
(ii) Said easement was acquired by the City of Rancho Cucamonga for storm drain
purposes, the need for which has been superseded by an alternate alignment for the storm
drain and a new easement.
(iii) The new easement has been executed by the property owner.
(iv) Said easement is obsolete now that the stone drain has been removed from it.
(v) The Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga heretofore made the
finding on February 28, 2007 that disposing of said easement, as herein contemplated,
would be in conformity with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
(vi) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City Of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby
find, determine, and resolve as follows:
]. Al] facts stated in the Recitals, Part A of this Resolution hereby are found to be true
and correct.
2. This Council hereby finds that the quitclaiming of said easement described in said deed
will benefit the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
3. The City Engineer and City Clerk hereby are authorized and directed to execute the
deed, a full, true, and correct copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A", and cause
the same to be recorded forthwith upon adoption of this Resolution.
4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution
P48
STAFF REPORT
CO-IbfUNITP SERPICES DEP.jRT\fEN"]' II(~`~"
f~-^`~'A~N-CrH'^OJ
Date: March 7, 2007 C,UCAMONGA
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
From: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director
By: Ryan Samples, Community Services Supervisor ~_~- -_ (....~
Subject: APPROVAL OF A REQUEST FROM "4 A SAFE RIDE HOME" ORGANIZATION FOR
THE WAIVER OF CENTRAL PARK ROOM RENTAL FEES FOR A FUNDRAISING
EVENT TO BE HELD ON APRIL 13, 2007
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council approve a request from "4 A Safe Ride Home", anon-profit
organization, for the waiver of the Central Park room rental fees for a fundraiser scheduled for
Friday, April 13, 2007.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
The City has received a request from "4 A Safe Ride Home", anon-profit organization, to hold a
BINGO fundraiser at Central Park Friday, April 13, 2007. The mission of "4 A Sate Ride Home' is
to fund cab rides for individuals as an alternative to drinking and driving.
Staff recommends that City Council consider the waiver of rental fees associated with the proposed
BINGO fundraiser as it promotes a safe alternative to drinking and driving. The organization would
still be required to pay direct fees and charges associated with obtaining permits to conduct their
event and would have to comply with all facility rental policies and regulations.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The fiscal impact to the City for the waiver of fees totals $403.00.
Kevin
Attachment
Services Director
I:ICOMMSERNCouncil&BoardslCityCouncillStaffReports120071WaiverFees4ASa(eRideHOmeFundraiser.3.7. D7. doc
Mcmary
~ - " ~` P49
.t..'
;~;. r. ~.
8780 19'" St. # 310 • Alta Loma, CA 91701 • Phone (909) 481-8300 • Fax (909) 481-4608
Dusgi~ Plumn~ a California Non-Profr~ Corporation Tcu lD d ?0-SISS875
aes•mria•nome.com
February Z 1, ?007
City of Rancho Cucamonga
11200 Baseline Rd.
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701
Dear Kevin McArdle.
On February 7, ?007, after attending the City Counsel Meeting, the City had offered to
help support our cause in promoting the dangers of drinking and driving and to help raise money
to fund cab rides for those in need of a safe alternative to drinking and driving. We are currently
planning a `Bingo' fundraising event to be held on April 13, 2007, at the Rancho Cucamonga
Community Center. Local businesses will be donating the prizes for our event. We are asking
for your support by waiving the rental fees of $95.00 an hour as part of a collaborative effort to
help make our community a safer place. Should you have any questions, please feel free to
contact us at (909) 481-8300. Thank you for your support.
Sincerely,
Debbie Crowe
~~~ ~ ~ r~ ~~~~ ~~~11~ ~ ®~
l '~
v
Dustin Plummer
.m, s Last - oa. n. Loos
a. uh.leanomamm -
Volume 2 Issue I
p~
b~~~~~
~~
~m~~
A Special Thanks
Donation Information ~
~ We would like to give a special thanks to thoon
who havo been sending in domtione, and to
Send donations payable. vi Ug1..
. thoeeofyouwho6aveattendedourmont6ly
to. -" ~Aa•M1 Rfdalo.ai
-'j
i a~t
~ fundraising events, your support ie truly mnk~
~ mg a difference. We would oleo like to thank
4 A Safe Ride Aome ?
, Ron Stern, Hollywood Star Show and
Dam Colley for providing the entertainment
8780 19th S0. #310 ~
/ at Sycamore Im. Sycamore Inn for hosting
Alta Loma
CA 91701 ~ our February [undraieinR event. Study Rutt
, with United Title Compmy for donating
brochure 6oldere. Outback 9teakhouee for
hooting our March (mdraising event. We
Donations can also be 4 A$ate RldeNpalf! would like to give a special thmka to Steven
Woodruff with Liberty Safe
All Americm
made on our website at: Soni
~ ~ ~ rte; ` ~ ,
Asphalt, John Bragger, O.F. WolRnbargeq
www.4asaferidehome.COm ~,;!a,;r,}; t' r. ~. ~' 1
c Inlaed Water, Heroes, Owinco Comtruo-
Lion
Rym Rush
Jeff Carter
Dave Burns
s,,.~
~ _
T"
~ ,
,
,
,
Jennifer Kunz, and Avery Labels £or your
'~
'- -
~. generous donation. We aDDreciete all of your
Foracourtesvcab U eomin E vents
'"
ride home
Rancho Cucamonga BINGO ~
Quak
IIVj
c
s~MYI
and Surrounding areas: April 13, 2007 (Friday) 6:00-9:30 .
_
_
_
1-800-806-TAXI (8294) Fi.ats•maarnrmpr.mady•tsao May 19, 2007 (Saturday) 7:OOpm
Orango County: $15.00 Ticket Price ~ ~ $7.00 Ticket Price
- Rancho Community Center
i-877-Yellowcab (93/r~ ~ Free T-Shirt Night
6692) Baeeline & Milliken in the Rancho Cucamonga Room
Give aceount#123 & Thero will be food, rallies, 50/50 drawing For the first 1500 people
Must use reference °4 A Sete Win a Flat Screen TV Tickets on sale now
Aide Home" or "Dustin
Plummer" Tickers on sale now
soard and Committee ~ Special Thanks to Sycamore Inn Cab~Rides To Date
Members
LAST MONTHS FUNDRAISER 80 People in Rancho
• President-Gary Plummer BROUGHT IN
& Surrounding Areas
• VicePresideaUTreasure- $3349
70
Sue Plummer . 6 People in Orange County Area
Directors-CristalGamia
and Debbie Crowe CONTACT INF ORMATION
• Committee members-
Linda Nagel, Elise Lugo, For Tickets, Information, or If you would like to become a Sponsor
Becky Schmidt, Tarty contact us at www.4AS AFERIDEHOME.com
Borden, Brandie Evans Phone: (909) 481$300 Em ail: d~lummerlCa3yahoo.com
Sauing Liues.... One Ride At A Time
~ ~~1 ~~f~c G°3oco~~ C~oo~~
~ ~~ ~ %
____~_
~~~ ~~~~l~1~~9 ~~Ill~ ~~~~ll~~C~?S~~~g ~0~14
o~ ~~~00~ gr~c~~f~ pr~o~c~~ do ~o~ ~o~~ o~f~o
When:April 13, 07
Where: Central Park (Baseline&MillikenJ
~i ~~~~~
~I~ V
I
•r
i
i
Time 6:30 - 9:30
In The Rancho Cucamonga Room
~~~~~~~ ~0C1 ~G=,1L~~ u~~1~~
O11 V `L~ ll ~ Il ~ooo
~~
o~ ~i s~-a3oo
Md we vrill r tickets to you
g~emory
~ .. ~, of
Dustin Plummer
Jan 51984 - Dec. li, Z006
4asaferidehome.com
STAFF REPORT
Date: March 7, 2007 RANCHO
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council C,UCAMONGA
From: Pamela S. Easter, Assistant City Manager
Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director
Joe Pulcinella, Animal Care & Services Director
Kimberly S. Thomas, Management Analyst III, City Manager's Office
Subject: AUTHORIZATION OF SUPPLEMENTAL FUNDING IN THE AMOUNT OF
$456,500 ($415,000 AND A 10% CONTINGENCY OF $41,500) FOR THE
ANIMAL CARE AND SERVICES DEPARTMENT CAPITAL
CONSTRUCTION BUDGET TO CONTINUE PHASE II OF MEDICAL AREA
MODIFICATIONS WITH THE PROJECT TO BE FUNDED BY CAPITAL
RESERVES (FUND 025) AND/OR FUND 001 FUND BALANCE AND
AUTHORIZATION FOR THE RELATED APPROPRIATIONS INTO THE
APPROPRIATE ACCOUNT NUMBERS TO BE DETERMINED BY STAFF
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council authorize supplemental funding in the amount of $456,500
($415,000 and a 10% contingency of $41,500) for the Animal Care and Services Department Capital
Construction Budget to continue Phase II of medical area modifications with the project to be funded
by Capital Reserves (Fund 025), and/or Fund 001 fund balance, and to authorize the related
appropriations into the appropriate account numbers to be determined by staff.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The authorization and appropriation for the new City Department is follow-up to the February 12`h
Special Council workshop. At this meeting, options for the Animal Care and Adoption Center's
continued construction were recommended. Support and direction were received for the
continuation of the Phase II construction project with enhanced medical areas and outdoor space
improvements. (The Center construction project and contracts were previously authorized by the
Council on February 1, 2006.) The additional facility improvements will result in more stable and
cost effective service, and promote the Department's No-Kill goal.
CONCLUSION
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the supplemental funding and authorize staff to
proceed with the final phase of the Center construction.
Respect ly sub fitted,
~~
J~e Pulcinella
Animal Care & Services Director
T ~ ar~`~
Finance Director
~~~~~..~~ 5~-~
Pamela S. Easter
Assistant City Manager
~~~~~~~(~j~G7i2Mcn®~
~mberly .Thomas
Management Analyst III
P50
MEMORANDUM
CITT IVL~1N SGER'S OFFICE
Date: March 7, 2007
To: Mayor Members of the City Council
From: Pamel' er Assistant City Manager
Subject: Resolution related to Freedom's Flame
~'~_~r°,~~~
~~
~_.
RANCHO
C,,UCAMONGA
P51
At the February 21, 2007 meeting, the City Council asked that a Resolution be brought back to the
March 7 Council meeting that implements the Council's February 21 vote related to Freedom's
Flame. This Resolution has been attached.
P52
RESOLUTION NO. 07-OS,3
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING
ITS RESOLUTION NOS. 02-229 AND 05-279
CONCERNING THE FREEDOM'S FLAME PROJECT
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follow:
SECTION 1: Resolution Nos. 02-229 and 05-279 of this City Council
concerning the Freedom's Flame Project hereby are repealed.
SECTION 2: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 7~h day of March 2007.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAINED:
Donald J. Kurth, M.D.
Mayor
ATTEST:
Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk
I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by
the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga at a regular meeting held March 7,
2007.
P53
STAFFREPORT -
ADiIIINISTR~ITI~'E SERVICES DEP.-1RT~tENT ~`Yy.~
RANCHO
Date: March 7, 2007 C,UCAMONGA
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
From: Linda Daniels, Acting Administrative Services Director
By: Manuel E. Pilonieta, Information Services Manager
Dawn Haddon, Purchasing Manager ~ ll-
Subject: APPROVAL TO RESCIND THE AWARD FOR THE PURCHASE OF ONE (1) LOT
OF IBM COMPUTER HARDWARE, IMAGING SERVICES, AND WARRANTIES FOR
NOTEBOOK COMPUTERS IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF $507,151 PER
RFB#06/07-010 FROM M8M COMPUTERS AND AWARD THE PURCHASE OF
ONE (1) LOT OF IBM COMPUTER HARDWARE, IMAGING SERVICES, AND
WARRANTIES FOR NOTEBOOK COMPUTERS IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF
$536,097 PER RFB#06/07-010 TO NEW TECH SOLUTIONS, INC. TO BE FUNDED
AS FOLLOWS: COMPUTER HARDWARE IN THE AMOUNT OF $515,840, FROM
THE FOLLOWING ACCOUNT NUMBERS: $17,771, (ACCOUNT NO. 2630801-
5215), $1,960, (ACCOUNT NO. 1001209-5215), $2,725, (ACCOUNT NO. 1100202-
5215) AND $493,384, (ACCOUNT NO. 1714001-5215); AND WARRANTIES FOR
NOTEBOOK COMPUTERS IN THE AMOUNT OF $20,257, FROM ACCOUNT NO.
1714001-5300; AND AUTHORIZATION TO APPROPRIATE $6,867 INTO ACCOUNT
NO. 1714001-5215, $2,329 INTO ACCOUNT NUMBER 1714001-5152, AND $1,266
INTO ACCOUNT NO. 1714001-5300 FROM THE COMPUTER EQUIPMENT
REPLACEMENT FUND TO FULLY FUND THE AWARD
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended to approve to rescind the award for the purchase of one (1) lot of IBM
computer hardware, imaging services, and warranties for notebook computers in the total
amount of $507,151 per RFB#06/07-010 from M&M Computers and award the purchase of one
(1) lot of IBM computer hardware, imaging services, and warranties for notebook computers to
New Tech Solutions, Inc. in the total amount of $536,097 per RFB#06/07-010 to be funded as
follows: computer hardware in the amount of $515,840, from the following account numbers:
$17,771, (Account No. 2630801-5215), $1,960, (Account No. 1001209-5215), $2,725, (Account
No. 1100202-5215) and $493,384, (Account No. 1714001-5215), and warranties for notebook
computers in the amount of $20,257, from Account No. 1714001-5300; and authorization to
appropriate $6,867 into Account No. 1714001-5215, $2,329 into Account No. 1714001-5152,
and $1,255 into Account No. 1714001-5300 from the computer equipment replacement fund to
fully fund the award.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
In Fiscal Year 2005/06, the City replaced approximately one-third of its aged computer
equipment with new Lenovo notebook and desktop computers. As part of the City's equipment
lifecycle program, the Information Systems Division is proposing the replacement of the
P54
bt!\RCH 7, ?007
remaining two-thirds of the aged computer equipment using funds that have been allocated for
the current fiscal year. The existing computer equipment is over six years old, past its useful
life, and needs to be replaced. The replacement of this equipment will reduce maintenance
costs, improve security, and provide computers that will meet the City's current and future
technology needs.
On January 17, 2007, Council approved an award to M&M Computers. However, upon receipt
of additional information from this vendor, it was determined that M&M Computers was non-
responsive. The second lowest bidder, Computek, International, was also determined to be
non-responsive upon receipt of additional information. Therefore an award is recommended to
New Tech Solutions, Inc., the next lowest, most responsive and responsible bidder.
Respectfully sub~mi~tted,~ Q
Ci~ ~/O_
Linda Daniels,
Acting Administrative Services Director
P55
_{-~ _~
R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
F I R F R R O T E C T I O N D I S T R I C T
Staff Report
DATE: March 7, 2007
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Peter M. Bryan, Fire Chief
BY: Dawn Haddon, Purchasing Manager N~
Pamela J. Pane, Management Analyst II
SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO ACCEPT GRANT REVENUE IN THE AMOUNT OF
$17,276.00 AWARDED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY (HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT 2006), ADMINISTERED BY
THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY OFFICE
OF EMERGENCY SERVICES, INTO ACCOUNT NO. 1380000-4740
(GRANT INCOME); AND AUTHORIZATION TO APPROPRIATE $17,276.00
INTO ACCOUNT NO. 1380501-5207 (O&M/CAPITAL SUPPLIES) AND
APPROVAL FOR THE SINGLE SOURCE PURCHASE OF MOTOROLA
RADIOS AND ACCESSORIES FROM MOTOROLA COMMUNICATIONS, IN
THE AMOUNT OF $17,276.00 FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NO. 1380501-
5207
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve the acceptance of grant revenue for Fire
Protection District operations in the amount of $17,276.00 awarded by the Department of
Homeland Security (Homeland Security Grant 2006), administered by the State of
California and San Bernardino County Office of Emergency Services, into Account No.
1380000-4740 (Grant Income); and authorization to appropriate $17,276.00 into Account
No. 1380501-5207 (O&M/Capital Supplies) and approval for the single source purchase of
Motorola radios and accessories from Motorola Communications, in the amount of
$17,276.00 funded from Account No. 1380501-5207. The grant is 100% funding with no
matching funds required.
BACKGROUND
The Fiscal Year 2006 State Homeland Security Program (SHSP '06) provides funds to
enhance the capability of State and local units of government to prevent, deter, respond to,
and recover from incidents of terrorism. The SHSP '06 grant funds will be used to
purchase new radios and accessories for District operations.
P56
Page 2
March 7, 2007
Approval for Homeland Security Grant 2006
Pricing for the Motorola radios is based on a piggyback purchase on the County of Los
Angeles contract, to include the various radios, and accessories with acceptable terms and
conditions and represents the best price currently available. Purchases of the Motorola
radio products are direct from Motorola and the single source was previously approved and
is on file in the Purchasing Division.
Respectfully submitted,
Peter M. Bryan
Fire Chief
A
z -
STAFF REPORT
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Date: March 7, 2007
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
From: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
RANCHO
C,UCAMONGA
By: Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer
Subject: APPROVAL OF MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES,
MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR TRACT 16592, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF
HILLSIDE ROAD, WEST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY TOLL
BROTHERS, INC.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Tract Map 16592,
accepting the subject agreements, securities, monumentation cash deposit and ordering the
annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1
and 2 for Tract Map 16592 and authorizing the Mayor to sign said agreements and authorizing the
City Clerk to cause said map to record.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Tentative Tract Map 16592, located on the north side of Hillside Road, west of Archibald Avenue, in
the Very Low Residential District (1-2 Dwelling Units per acre), was approved by the Planning
Commission on May 26, 2004. This project is for a subdivisidn of 7.59 gross acres of land into 11
single family detached homes.
The Developer, Toll Brothers, Inc., is submitting agreement, securities and monumentation cash
deposit to guarantee the construction of the public street improvements in the following amounts:
Faithful Performance Bond $ 408,900.00
Labor and Material Bond $ 408,900.00
Monumentation Cash Deposit $ 2,950.00
Copies of the agreement and securities are available in the City Clerk's Offce.
The Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms signed by the Developer are on file in the City Clerk's
Office.
Respectfully submitted,
Wil e Valbuena
~~ ~~
Assistant Engineer
P57
WO:WV:dlw
Attachments
P58
HILLSIDE RD
Q
N
w
x
}
a
CITY OF
RANCIiO CUCAMONGA
ENGINEERING DIVISION
PROJECT
SITE
RD
9
m
U
1
AV
N
ITEM: T ACr /~~',~_
TITLE: _V/C/ /TY~
i
30
P59
RESOLUTION NO. D / ` Q S
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES
AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT FOR TRACT 16592
WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map 16592 submitted by Toll Brothers, Inc. and consisting
of a subdivision of 7.59 gross acres of land for the development of 11 single family detached
homes, located on the north side of Hillside Road, west of Archibald Avenue, in the Very Low
Residential District (1-2 Dwelling Units per acre), was approved by the Planning Commission of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga on May 26, 2004; and
WHEREAS, Tract Map 16592 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown
on the Tentative Tract Map; and
WHEREAS, all the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the
installation of public street and storm drain improvements by the City Council of said City have
now been met by posting the Improvement Securities and monumentation cash deposit by Toll
Brothers, Inc., as developer; and
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and
Monumentation Cash Deposit submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby
approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and that said Tract Map 16592 be and the same is hereby
approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be
filed for record.
P60
RESOLUTION NO. Q ~"' ~ `S~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE
ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR TR 16592
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has
previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and
Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State
of California (the "72 Act"), said special maintenance district known and designated as
Landscape District Maintenance No. 1, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street
Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and
WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the 72 Act authorize the
annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and
WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of
resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority
protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owner of property within
the territory to be annexed; and
WHEREAS, notwithstanding the such provisions of the 72 Act related to the annexation
of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California
("Article XIIID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy
assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts on
the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and
WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the
"Territory') be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual
assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto
(the "Improvements"); and
WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed
forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance
District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property' (the "Corisent and
Waiver"); and
P61
RESOLUTION NO.
TR 16592-TOLL BROTHERS, INC.
March 7, 2007
Page 2
WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have
expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 72 Act to the
annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the
annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and
WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also
expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 72 Act andlor
Article XIIID applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the
Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and
have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed
annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory
to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the
Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B hereto.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: The above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2: This City Council hereby finds and determines that:
a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not
exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such
parcel from the Improvements.
b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the
Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the
maintenance of the Improvements.
c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed
annual assessments.
SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the
Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the
proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the
levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set
forth in Exhibit B.
SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including levy of all
assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory.
P62
Exhibit A
To
Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property
To Be Annexed
The Owner of the Property is:
Title to said estate or interest at the date hereof is vested in:
TOLL BROTHERS, INC.
The legal description of the Properties are:
PARCEL NO. 2 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 10783, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED
IN BOOK136, PAGES 94 AND 95 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY
RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.
The above described parcels are shown on sheet A-2 attached herewith and by this reference
made a part hereof.
A-1
cl
~I
of
~~
I
I
I
I
---- ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. !
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. (AND 2
HILLSIDE Rp.
sj/eEET ~S
s~e~r t~~yrs
~CoM/~SEA C~tN/TE
6S Eiq
~~ E~
/7, 8c~ s~'
P63
Q
MOR'G'f!
T1Pi~'T ~~~2
CITY OF RANCFIO CiJCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARIDINO
P64
Exhibit B
To
Description of the District Improvements
Fiscal Year 2006/2007
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (GENERAL CITY):
Landscape Maintenance .District No. 1 (LMD #1) represents 23.63 acres of landscape area,
41.88 acres of parks and 16.66 acres of community trails that are located at various sites
throughout the City. These sites are not considered to be associated with any one particular
area within the City, but rather benefit the entire City on a broader scale. As such, the parcels
within this district do not represent a distinct district area as do the City's remaining LMD's.
Typically parcels within this district have been annexed upon development
The various sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, paseos, street
trees, entry monuments, community trails and parks. The 41.88 acres of parks consist of Bear
Gulch Park, East and West Beryl Park, Old Town Park, Church Street Park, Golden Oaks Park
and the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center.
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS):
Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD #1) is used to fund the maintenance and/or
installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The
facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit
the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance
and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district.
The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals
on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the
City.
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (LOCAL STREETS):
Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (SLD #2) is used to fund the maintenance and/or
installation of street lights and traffc signals located on local streets throughout the City but
excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally, this area
encompasses the residential area of the City west of Haven Avenue. It has been determined
that the facilities in this district benefit this area of the City.
This sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or
a portion thereof) on focal streets generally west of Haven Avenue.
B-1
P65
Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2006/2007)
For Project: TR 16592
Number of Lamps
Street Lights 5800E 9500E 16 OOOL 22 OOOL 27,500E
SLD # 1 2* 2 --- --- --'
SLD # 2 10 --- --- --- ---
Community Trail Turf Non-Turf Trees
Landscaping DGSF SF SF EA
LMD # 1 17,862 --- --- 65
*Existing items installed with original project
Assessment Units by District
Parcel S 1 S 2 L 1
11 11 11 11
B-2
P66
Exhibit C
Proposed Annual Assessment
Fiscal Year 2006/2007
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (GENERAL CITY):
The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $92.21 for the fiscal year 2006/07. The following table
summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City):
# of Physical # of Rate Per
Units Assessment Assessment Assessment
Land Use Type Units Factor Units Unit Revenue
Single parcel 8154 1.0 8154 $92.21
Family
Multi-Family Units 7404 0.5 7404 $92.21
Comm/Ind. Acre 2 1.0 2 $92.21
TOTAL
$751,880.34
$341,361.42
$184.42
$1,093,426.18
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 16592) is:
11 SFR's x 1.0 A.U. Factor x $92.21 Rate Per A.U. _ $1,014.31 Annual Assessment
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1~(ARTERIAL STREETS):
The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2004!05. The following table
summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets):
# of # of Rate Per
Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue
Single Parcel 22,901 1.00 22,901 $17.77
Family
Multi-Family Unit 10,449 1.00 10,449 $17.77
Commercial Acre 2,834.56 2.00 2,834.56 $17.77
TOTAL
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 16592) is:
11 SFR's x 1.0 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. _ $195.47 Annual Assessment
$406,950.77
$185,678.73
$100,740.26
$693,369.76
C-t TR 16592
P67
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (LOCAL STREETS):
The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $39.97 for the fiscal year 2004/05. The following table
summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets):
# of # of Rate Per
Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue
Parcel 6337 1.00
m 6337 $39.97 $253'289'
Fa
il
Y
Multi Family Unit 1087 1.00 1087 $39.97 $43,447.39
Commercial Acre 33.63 2.00 67.26 $39.97 $2,688.38
Total $299.425.6
fi
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 16592) is:
11 SFR's x 1.0 A.U. Factor x $39.97 Rate Per A.U. _ $439.67 Annual Assessment
C-2 TR 16592
P68
STAFF REPORT ?;`'
^.V CiIV ELRNG DEPd RT~fENT
r
RANCHO
Date: March 7, 2007 CUCAMONGA
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
From: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
By: Maria E. Perez, Associate Engineer
Subject: ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED AND AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE
EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $74,264.00 TO THE
APPARENT LOW BIDDER, INTERNATIONAL PAVEMENT SOLUTIONS,
INCORPORATED AND AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF A 10%
CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $7,430.00 FOR THE CUCAMONGA
CREEK CHANNEL BIKE TRAIL FROM FOOTHILL BOULEVARD TO BASE LINE
ROAD AND RED HILL PARK EXERCISE TRAIL, TO BE FUNDED FROM
BEAUTIFICATION FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO. 11103165650/1533110-0, BTA
FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO. 11923035650/1533192-0 AND PD-85 FUNDS,
ACCOUNT NO. 18483035650/1594848-0 AND APPROPRIATE AN ADDITIONAL
AMOUNT OF $1,000.00 TO ACCOUNT NO. 18483035650/1594848-0 FROM PD-
85 FUND BALANCE
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council accept the bids received and award and authorize the
execution of the contract in the amount of $74,264.00 to the apparent low bidder, International
Pavement Solutions, Incorporated, and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the
amount of $7,430.00, for the Cucamonga Creek Channel Bike Trail from Foothill Boulevard to
Base Line Road and Red Hill Park Exercise Trail, to be funded from Beautification funds,
Account No. 11103165650/1533110-0, BTA Funds, Account No. 11923035650/1533192-0 and
PD-85 Funds, Account No. 18483035650/1594848-0 and appropriate an additional amount of
$1,000.00 to Account No. 1843035650/1594848-0 from PD-85 fund balance.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on February 20, 2007, for
the subject project. The Engineer's estimate was $97,616.00. Staff has reviewed all bids
received and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements with any
irregularities to be inconsequential. Staff has completed the required background investigation
and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents.
The Cucamonga Creek Channel Bike Trail from Foothill Boulevard to Base Line Road and Red
Hill Park Exercise Trail scope of work consists of applying a slurry seal to Flood Control access
road, signing and striping of the access road as a Class 1 bikeway, improving the access as the
P69
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Re: Award Cucamonga Creek Channel Bike Trail and Red Hill Park Exercise Trail
March 7, 2007
Page 2
trail crosses Red Hill Country Club Drive and resurfacing the Red Hill Park exercise trail. The
contract documents call for twenty (20) working days to complete this construction.
Respectfully submitted,
William. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:MEP
Attachments
P70
VICINITY MAP
CUCAMONGA CREEK BIKE TRAIL
FROM FOOTHILL BLVD. TO BASE LINE RD.
AND RED HILL PARK EXERCISE TRAIL
PROJECT
LOCATION
m
~
~„ >' >
~~ ~
> ,,Q
N
c c E"
r- ~~ -
.
_
i t ~ x ,~ x _ ~.= a _
Almond Rd
~l ~
~r ~- ~~
~ ~
~
Hillside Rd' I
'' r s
~
~ _ ~ ~
. .~ I
Wi4an 4r ~
~ ,
Cf ~. , ~I
y
;
t -" J~ ~ '
=r
~
v
~
m
~-"'
Banyan Sty ~ ~R i ,i ~~ , te ~
--
Base L
;Q
athst - I ` - - - - -_J-
y
'~
-
- d~Bth,St
~
~ ~ I
~
`;~ .: ~ -- 4th St
°
-q=._.~-
C
>
a N_
° C q~-..gip, .~. _..,_._.
~
E _
tl V R - ~. ~
= a` z = ~ w
a
" " `Wilson Av
t ~- Route 30
Highland Av
__-:T-.
HI
a§e Lme Rd'
T -._
+ _,
ottiill`BI =.
row Rt
.~
I31D SUMMARY FOK 131D OPENING FEBRUARY 2U, 2UU7 API'ARlN1'LOIVBIDDIiR
CUCAMONGA CREEK 131KEWAY ANll REll HILL PARK
EXERCISE TRAIL ENGINEERS COST
ESTIMATE International Pavement
Solutions
Wheeler Pavin ,Inc.
UNIT ISIU UNI"1' UNIT'
NO ll' I1N1'1' UF.SCRIP PION COST' AM1IOUNT C(ISI' AMOUNT COST' AM1IOUN'I'
1. 1 LS Mobilization $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $3,750.00 $3,750.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00
2. 15 TON AC Pavement including sawcutting and removal of existing $220.00 $3,300.00 $400.00 $6,000.QO $566A0 $8,490.00
3. 1 EA Remove Tree $700.00 $700.00 $800.00 $800.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00
4. 2 EA Relocate Existing Bollard $500.00 $1,000.00 $500.00 $1,000.00 $250.00 . $500.00
5. 2 EA Construct Guard Post $1,000.00 $2,000.00 $500.00 $1,000.00 $250.00 $500.00
6. 7100 SY Construct Slurry Seal Type 11 $4.00 $28,400.00 $3.19 $22,649.00 $2.70 $19,170.00
7. 3900 SY Construct Guard Top Seal Coat $4.00 $15,600.00 $1.35 $5,265.00 $1.70 $6,630.00
8. 20 LF Construct Curb and Gutter Per City Standard 104 $75.00 $1,500.00 $25.00 $500.00 $100A0 $2,000.00
9. 5 EA Construct Undersidewalk Drain per City Standard 107-B $2,500.00 $12,500.00 $950.00 $4,750.00 $4,050.00 $20,250.00
10. 330 SF Construct 4" PCC Sidewalk Per City Standard 103 $24.00 $7,920.00 $7.00 $2,310.00 $7.70 $2,541.00
11. 1 EA Adjust RCV box $200.00 $200.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $SOOAO $SOUAO
12. 1 EA Relocate and a(Ijust traffic signal pull box $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,100.00 $1,100.00 $SOO.UO $500.00
13.
50
LF Salvage and Reconstruct Guardrail per CalVans Standard
A77A
$20.00
$1,000.00
$105.00
$5,250.00
$70.00
$3,500.00
14. 104 SP' Construct Disabled Access Ramp Per Caltrans Std ASSC $24.00 $2,496.00 $20.00 $2,080.00 $25.75 $2,678.00
15. 80 LF Construct Hand Rail per City Standard 602, Type A $25.00 $2,000.00 $76.00 $6,080.00 $60.00 $4,800.00
16. 1 LS Traffic Signing and Striping $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $8,730.00 $8,730.00 $12,800.00 $12,800.00
17. 1 LS Traffic Control $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00
TOTAL $97,616.00 $74,264.00 $94,359.00
Page 1 y
Blll SUMMARY FOR BIU OPENING FEBRUARY 20, 2007
American As halt South
NPG
ACR Concrete & Asphalt
Const.
UNIT RIU UNIT' UNIT'
NO '1'Y UNIT' UESCRIr'1'ION COST' A~IOUN'I' COST AMOUNT COST AMUUNT
1. 1 LS Mobilization $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $18,145.00 $18,145.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00
2. ] 5 TON AC Pavement including sawcut[ing and removal of existing $330.00 $4,950.00 $549.00 $8,235.00 $533.00 $7,995.00
3. 1 EA Remove Tree $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $900.00 $900.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00
4. 2 EA Relocate Existing Bollard $275.00 $550.00 $750.00 $1,500.00 $250.00 $500.00
5. 2 EA Construct Guard Post $325.00 $650.00 $745.00 $1,490.00 $2,100.00 $4,200.00
6. 7100 SY Construct Slurry Seal Type 11 $5.00 $35,500.00 $4.32 $30,672.00 $4.10 $29,110.00
7. 3900 SY Construct Guard Top Seal Coat $2.00 $7,800.00 $0.99 $3,861.00 $1.30 $5,070.00
8. 20 LF Construct Curb and Gutter Per City Standard 104 $154.00 $3,080.00 $49.00 $980.00 $85.00 $1,700.00
9. 5 EA Conshvct Undersidewalk.Drain per City Standard 107-B $1,210.00 $6,050.00 $2,499.00 $12,495.00 $4,800.00 $24,000.00
10. 330 SF Construct 4" PCC Sidewalk Per City Standard 103 $9.35 $3,085.50 $7.50 $2,475.00 $14.50 $4,785.00
11. 1 EA Adjust RCV box $500.00 $500.00 $300.00 $300.00 $300.00 $300.00
12. 1 EA Relocate and adjust traffic signal pull box $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $500.00 $500.00 $300.00 $300.00
13. 50 LF Salvage and Reconstruct Guardrail per Caltrans Standard
A77A $65.00 $3,250.00 $99.00 $4,950.00 $96.00 $4,800.00
14. 104 SF Construct Disabled Access Ramp Per Caltrans Std A88C $19.25 $2,002.00 $18.00 $1,872.00 $28.00 $2,912.00
I5. 80 LF Consttuct Hand Rail per City Standard 602, Type A $44.00 $3,520.00 $95.00 $7,600.00 $50.00 $4,000.00
16. 1 LS Traffic Signing and Striping $14,000.00 $14,000.00 $9,899.00 $9,899.00 $14,000.00 $14,000.00
17. 1 LS Traffic Control $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $4,124.00 $4,124.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00
TOTAL $95,937.50 $109,998.00 $110,672.00
v
Page 2 N
131D SUMMARY FOR 13ID OPENING FEBRUARY 2f1, 2U07
Sull -Miller Contractin
UNIT RIII UNIT' UNIT
NO 'll' UNI'T' URSCRIPTION COST AAIUUN'I' WS'I' AMOUNT COST AMOUN'T'
1. I LS Mobilization $9,910.00 $9,910.00
2: 15 TON AC Pavement including sawcutting and removal of existing $290.00 $4,350.00
3. 1 EA Remove Tree $1,500.00 $1,500.00
4. 2 EA Relocate Existing Bollard $990.00 $1,980.00
5. 2 EA Construct Guard Post $990.00 $1,980.00
6. 7100 SY Construct Slurry Seal Type II $3.00 $21,300.00
7. 3900 SY Construct Guard Top Seal Coat $1.90 $7,410.00
8. 20 LF Construct Curb and Gutter Per City Standard 104 $76.00 $1,520.00
9. 5 EA Construct Undersidewalk Drain per City Standard 107-B $4,500.00 $22,500.00
10. 330 SF Construct 4" PCC Sidewalk Per City Standard 103 $11.00 $3,630.00
11. 1 EA Adjust RCV box $600.00 $600.00
12. 1 EA Relocate and adjust traffic signal pull box $800.00 $800.00
13. 50 LF Salvage and Reconstruct Guardrail per Caltrans Standard
A77A $108.00 $5,400.00
14. 104 SF Construct Disabled Access Ramp Per Caltrans Std A88C $30.00 $3,120.00
15. 80 LF Construct Hand Rail per City Standard 602, Type A $110.00 $8,800.00
16. 1 LS Traffic Signing and Striping $14,000.00 $14,000.00
17. 1 LS Traffic Control $3,700.00 $3,700.00
TOTAL $112,500.00
Page 3 v
W
STAFF REPORT -
L.N GINEERING DEPdRT~IENT
RANCHO
Date: March 7, 2007 C,UCAMONGA
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
From: William J. O'Neil,'City Engineer
By: Cindy Hackett, Associate Engineer
Subject: ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED AND AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF
THE CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $347,947 TO THE APPARENT LOW BIDDER,
MOBASSALY ENGINEERING, INC., AND AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF A 10%
CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $34,794.70 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF
CHURCH STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION AND WIDENING FROM 100'± WEST
OF PASITO AVENUE TO KINLOCK AVENUE, TO BE FUNDED FROM MEASURE I
FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO. 1 1 7630356 50/1 4701 76-0, TRANSPORTATION FUNDS,
ACCOUNT NO. 11243035650/1476124-0, TEA 21 FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO.
12083035650/1470208-0 AND PROPOSITION 108 FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO.
12163035650/1470216-0 AND APPROPRIATE AN ADDITIONAL AMOUNT OF $35,000
TO ACCOUNT NO. 11763035650/1470176-0 FROM MEASURE "I" FUND BALANCE
RECOMMENDATION
P74
It is recommended that the City Council accept the bids received and award and' authorize the execution
of the contract in the amount of $347,947.00 to the apparent low bidder, Mobassaly Engineering, Inc.,
and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $34,794.70, for the Church Street
Pavement Rehabilitation and Widening 100'± West of Pasito Avenue to Kinlock Avenue, to be funded
from Measure I funds, Account No. 1 1 7630 356 50/1 4701 76-0, Transportation funds, Account No.
11243035650/1476124-0, TEA 21 funds, Account No. 12083035650/1470208-0 and Proposition 108
funds, Account No. 12163035650/1470216-0 and appropriate an additional amount of $35,000 to
Account No. 1 1 76 303565 0/1 4701 76-0 from Measure "I" fund balance.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on February 13, 2007, for the
subject project. The Engineer's estimate was $347,947.00. Staff has reviewed all bids received and
found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements with any irregularities to be
inconsequential. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds all bidders meet
the requirements of the bid documents.
The Church Street Pavement Rehabilitation and Widening 100'± West of Pasito Avenue to Kinlock
Avenue scope of work consists of cold milling, asphalt concrete paving, asphalt rubber hot mix paving,
installation of concrete curb & gutter, sidewalk, handicap ramp and drive approach, slough wall,
irrigation, trees, street lights, adjusting all utilities to new grade, striping and installing raised pavement
markers. The contract documents call for thirty (30) working days to complete this construction.
Respectfully submitted,
/ ~ ~~ - ~'
Willia J~O~eil
City ngineer
VICINITY MAP
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CHURCH STREET
(100 t OF PASTTO AVE. TO KDYLOCK AVE.)
PAVEMENT REHABILITATION AND IIIDENING
t~
~~
N
N.T.3.
D7~n r~r'T' c'TTT'
B[D SUD4~IARY FOR BID OPF,NING Febraury 13, 2007
Church Slrcet Pa~~ement Rehabilitation and R'idening
ENGINEERS COS'C
ESTIMATE APPARENT LOIVBIDDER
Dlobassaly Engineering,
Inc
Gentry Brothers, Inc.
Ortiz Asphalt Paving
Company
UNIT UNIT IJNI"1' UNI'P
NO TY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUN'C COST AMOUNT COS'!' AMOUNT COS'C AMOUN"r
1. l LS $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $47,000.00 $47,000.00 $96,000.00 $96,000.00 $73,373.49 $73,373.49
2. 1310 TONS ASPHALT RUBBER HOT MIX (ARHM) INCLUDING CRA $85.00 $1 11,350.00 $99.501 $130,345.00 $88.00 $115,280.00 $94.81 $124,201.10
3. 681 'I'ONS ASPHALT CONCRETE $7S.OO $51,075.00 $72.00 $49,032.00 $62.001 $42,222.00 $77.161 $52,545.96
4. 920 TONS CRUSHED AGG. BASE $50.00 $46,000.00 $26.50 $24,380.00 $22.00 $20,240.00 $28.041 $25,796.80
5. 3400 SY COLD PLANING $3.00 $10,200.00 $2.20 $7,480.00 $2.00 $6,800.00 $2.711 $9,214.00
6. 470 L1~ CONSTRUCT PCC CURB AND GUTTER PER CITY STD $30.00 $14,100.00 $18.50 $8,695.00 $25.00 $11,750.00 $20.32 $9,550.40
7. 1 LS CONSTRUCT 12' DRIVE APPROACH PER CITY STD. D $700.001 $700.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $3SO.OO $350.00 $3,203.251 $3,203.25
8. 2200 SP CONSTRUCT PCC 5' WIDE SIDE WALK CITY STD. D $9.001 $19,800.00 $4.201 $9,240.00 $4.001 $8,800.00 $4.281 $9,416.00
9. 220 LF CONSTRUCT CONC. SLOUGH WALL Iz-COURSE) PER CITY $30.00 $6,600.00 $26.00 $5,720.00 $40.001 $8,800.00 $32.081 $7,057.60
10. 1 8A CONSTRUCT PCC SINGLE HANDICAP RAMP PER CIT $800.00 $800.00 $2,300.00 $2,300.00 ~ $2,800.00 $2,800.00 $2,620.03 $2,620.03
l 1. 80 LI INSTALL 1-3 DIA. AND 1-4" DIA. SCH. 40 PVC SLEEVE ( $50.001 $4,000.00 $90.00 $7,200.00 $88.00 $7,040.00 $26.73 $2,138.40
12. 80 I.F INSTALL 3' DIA. ELECT. CONDUIT WITH PULL ROPE $30.001 $2,400.00 $100.00 $8,000.00 $86.00 $6,880.00 $96.25 $7,700.00
13. 300 LI~ ST LT CONDUIT INSTALLATION (TRENCHING AND CO $30.001 $9,000.00 $24.00 $7,200.00 $23.001 $6,900.00 $39.75 1 $11,925.00
14. 8 LA 15GAL.TREE(PYRUSKAWAKAMI'EVERGREENPE $300.001 $2,400.00 $225.00 $1,800.00 $200.00 $1,600.00 $187.14 1 $1,497.12
15. 9 L'A 15 GAL TREE (MAGNOLIA GRAND'SAINT MARY')ALONG
CHURCH ST $300.00 1 $2,700.00 $225.00 $2,025.00 $200.00 $1,800.00 $187.14 $1,684.26
16. 2600 SI~ PLANT SOD AT THEPARKwAVAREA $3.50 1 $9,100.00 $1.75 1 $4,550.00 $2.60 1 $6,760.00 $2.67 $6,942.00
17. 1 LS INSTALL IRRIGATION LINES,HEADS,CONTROLVALV $2,000.00 1 $2,000.00 $6,500.00 $6,500.00 $14,000.00 $14,000.00 $14,436.90 $14,436.90
I8. 20 [;A ADJUST TO GRADE (WATER; GAS VALVE) $200.00 1 $4,000.00 $40.00 $800.00 $25.00 1 $500.00 $36.68 1 $733.60
19. 12 GA ADJUST MANHOLE TO GRADE $300.00 1 $3,600.00 $300.00 $3,600.00 $300.00 1 $3,600.00 $347.56 1 $4,170.72
20. 1 LS STRIPING AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS $]3,000.00 $13,000.00 $10,400.00 $10,400.00 $11,000.00 1 $11,000.00 $9,934.73 $9,934.73
21. 2 L"A INSTALL SIGNS(MEASUREISIGNSEESPECS) $1,500.00 $3,000.00 $750.00 $1,500.00 $600.00 1 $1,200.00 $834.13 $1,668.26
22. 220 LI' INSTALL 6' CHAIN LINK FENCE (ON TOP OF SLOUGH $30.00 $6,600.00 $19.00 $4,180.00 $29.00 $6,380.00 $29.41 $6,470.20
23. I LS TRAFFIC CONTROL $13,000.00 1 $13,000.00 $4,500.00 $4,500.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,720.18 $5,720.18
~ ~ I
TO'T'AL $355,425.00 $347,947.00 $385,702.00 1 $392,000.00
v
v
Page 1 °~
BIU SUDiD1ARY FOK BlD OPENING Febraury 13, 2007
Clmrch Street Pavement Kchabilita[ion and Widening
Hardy & Harper, Inc
R.J. Noble Company
Laird Construction
Company
Hillcrest Contracting, Inc
UNIT UNIT ~ UNIT UNIT
NO 'I'Y UNIT DESCKlP770N COST AMOUNT COS'P AMOUN'P COST AD10UN'1' COST AMOUNT
1. I LS $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $48,000.00 $48,000.00 $70,214.00 $70,214.00 $75,000.00 $75,000.00
2. 1310 TONS ASPHALT RUBBER HOT MIX (ARHM) INCLUDING CRA $98.50 $129,035.00 $90.001 $117,900.00 $90.00 $ 117,900.00 $93.00 $121,830.00
3. 681 'I'ONS ASPHALT CONCRETE $82.001 $55,842.00 $70.00 $47,670.00 $75.00 $51,075.00 $78.001 $53,118.00
4. 920 TONS CRUSHED AGG. BASE $26.001 $23,920.00 $24.001 $22,080.00 $35.001 $32,200.00 $42.60 $39,192.00
5. 3400 SY COLD PLANING $3.001 $10,200.00 $3.10 $]0,540.00 $3.001 $10,200.00 $3.501 $11,900.00
6. 470 LF CONSTRUCT PCC CURB AND GUTTER PER CITY STD $25.00 $1 ],750.00 $30.00 $14,100.00 $32.50 $15,275.00 $32.001 $15,040.00
7. I LS CONSTRUCT 12' DRIVE APPROACH PER CITY STD. D $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $500.00 $500.00 $2,350.00 $2,350.00 $2,100.00 $2,10.0.00
8. 2200 SF' CONSTRUCT PCC 5' WIDE SIDE WALK CITYSTD.D $5.00 $11,000.00 $4.50 $9,900.00 $5.25 $11,550.00 $6.60 $14,520.00
9. 220 LF CONSTRUCT CONC.sLOUGHwALL(2-couRSE)PERCITY $45.001 $9,900.00 $142.001 $31,240.00 $50.001 $11,000.00 $46.00 $IQ120A0
10. l EA CONSTRUCT PCC SINGLE HANDICAP RAMP PER CIT $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $1,090.001 $1,090.00 $4,000.001 $4,000.00 $2,100.00 $2,100.00
l 1. 80 LF INSTALL 1-3 DIA. AND 1~' DIA. SCH. 40 PVC SLEEVE ( $85.001 $6,800.00 $90.001 $7,200.00 $75.001 $6,000.00 $42.001 $3,360.00
12. 80 LF INSTALL 3' DIA. ELECT. CONDUIT WITH PULL ROPE $95.00 1 $7,600.00 $99.00 $7,920.00 $ I OO.OOI $8,000.00 $42.001 $3,360.00
13. 300 LF ST LT CONDUIT INSTALLATION (TRENCHING AND CO $23.00 1 $6,900.00 $24.00 $7,200.00 $25.001 $7,500.00 $32.00 $9,600A0
14. 8 EA 15 GAL. TREE (PYRUS KAWAKAMI "EVERGREEN PE $100.00 1 $800.00 $470.00 $3,760.00 $225.00 $1,800.00 $130.00 $1,040.00
15. y EA 15 GAL.TREE(MAGNOUAGRANO'sAINTMARY'(ALONG
CHURCH ST $10000 $900.00 $470.00 $4,230.00 $225.00 $2,025A0 $130.00 $1,170.00
I6. 2600 SF PLANTSOOArTHEPARKwAYAREA $3.00 $7,800.00 $2.201 $5,720.00 $2.50 $6,500.00 $I.OS $2,730.00
17. 1 I.S INSTALL IRRIGATION LINES, HEADS, CONTROL VALV $13,000.00 1 $13,000.00 $15,400.00 $15,400.00 $10,000.00 1 $10,000.00 $7,400.00 1 $7,400.00
I8. 20 EA ADJUST TO GRADE (WATER; GAS VALVE) $200.00 1. $4,000.00 $220.00 $4,400.00 $50.00 1 $1,000.00 $53.00 $1,060.00
19. 12 EA ADJUST MANHOLE TO GRADE $350.00 $4,200.00 $330.00 $3,960.00 $325.00 $3,900.00 $315.00 $3,780.00
20. 1 LS STRIPING AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,200.00 $10,200.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $9,800.00 $9,800.00
21. 2 EA INSTALL SIGNS(MEASUREISIGNSEESPECS) $1,600.00 $3,200.00 $660.00 $1,320.00 $500.00 $1,000.00 $820.00 $1,640.00
22. 220 LF INSTALL 6' CHAIN LINK FENCE (ON TOP OF SLOUGH $35.00 1 $7,700.00 $61.00 $13,420.00 $45.00 $9,900.00 $29A0 $6,380.00
23. I LS TRAFFICCONTROI $15,000.00 1 $15,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $4,300.00 $4,300.00
TOTAL I $394,547.00 $397,750.00 $398,389.00 $400,540.00
V
Page 2 v
BID SUMMARY NOR BLD OPENING Febraury 13, 2007
Church Street Pavement Rehabilitation and R'idening
All American Asphalt
Roadway Engineering &
Contracting, Inc.
E.G.N. Construction, hoc.
EQS Inc.
UNIT' UNIT UNIT UNIT
NO 1'Y UNl1' DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT' COST AMOUNT' COST AMOUNT'
1. 1 LS $64,563.00 $64,563.00 $80,000.00 $80,000.00 $60,000.00 $60,000.00 $69,000.00 $69,000.00
2. 1310 'I'ONS ASPHALT RUBBER HOT MIX (ARHM)INCLUDINGCRA $87.001 $113,970.00 $105.00 $137,550.00 $103.001 $134,930.00 $102.001 $133,620.00
3. 681 'I'ONS ASPHALT CONCRETE $67.001 $45,627.00 $82.50 $56,182.50 $80.001 $54,480.00 $85.001 $57,885.00
4. 920 'I'ONS CRUSHED AGG. BASE $30.001 $27,600.00 $35.50 $32,660.00 $37.001 $34,040.00 $40.001 $36,800.00
5. 3400 SY COLD PLANING $3.OO) $!0,200.00 $2.941 $9,996.00 $3.871 $13,158.00 $4.801 $15,300.00
6. 470 LF CONSTRUCT PCC CURB AND GUTTER PER CITY STD $38.001 $17,860.00 $27.00 $12,690.00 $25.001 $11,750.00 $29.00 $13,630.00
7. I LS CONSTRUCTI2'DRIVEAPPROACHPERCITYSTD.D $2,800.001 $2,500.00 $1,900.00 $1,900.00 $1,000.001 $1,000.00 $425.00 $425.00
8. 2200 SP CONSTRUCT PCC 6' WIDE SIDE WALK CITY STD. D $7.50 $16,500.00 $4.151 $9,130.00 $4.75 $10,450.00 $3.85 $8,470.00
9. 220 LF CONSTRUCT CONC. SLOUGH WALL (2-COURSEI PER CITY $80.00 $17,600.00 $39.00 $8,SSO.UO $60.001 $13,200.00 $45.00 $),900.00
l0. l GA CONSTRUCT PCC SINGLE HANDICAP RAMP PER CIT $3,000.001 $3,000.00 $3,900.00 $3,900.00 $3,600.001 $3,600.00 $950.001 $950.00
11. 80 LF INSTALL 1-3 DIA. AND 1-0' DIA. SCH. 40 PVC SLEEVE ( $68.001 $5,440.00 $87.00 $6,960.00 $ ] 03.001 $8,240.00 $140.00 $11,200.00
12. 80 LF INSTALL 3" DIA. ELECT. CONDUIT WITH PULL ROPE $63.001 $5,040.00 $95.00 $7,600.00 $ 112.001 $8,960.00 $100.00 $8,000.00
13. 300 LF ST LT CONDUIT INSTALLATION (TRENCHING AND CO $45.00 1 $13,500.00 $23.001 $6,900.00 $27.80 1 $8,250.00 $25.00 $7,500.00
14. 8 L'A 16 GAL.TREE(PYRUSKAWAKAMI'EVERGREENPE $180.00 1 $1,440.00 $160.00 $1,280.00 $405.00 $3,240.00 $190.00 $1,520.00
15. 9 EA 1s GAL. TREE (MAGNOLIA GRAND "SAINT MARY")ALONG
CHURCH ST g 180.00 1 $1,620.00 $160.00 $1,440.00 $405.00 1 $3,645.00 $190.00 $1,710.00
16. 2600 SF PLANT SODArTHEPARKwAYAREA $3.00 1 $7,800.00 $1.30 $3,380.00 $2.40 $6,240.00 $2.70 1 $7,020.00
17. 1 LS INSTALL IRRIGATION LINES, HEADS, CONTROLVALV $14,000.00 $14,000.00 $6,300.00 $6,300.00 $13,400.00 $13,400.00 $14,500.00 $14,500.00
18. 20 EA ADJUST TO GRADE (WATER; GAS VALVE) $100.00 $2,000.00 $210.00 $4,200.00 $40.00 $800.00 $200.00 $4,000.00
19. 12 L'A ADJUST MANHOLE TO GRADE $250.00 1 $3,000.00 $290.00 1 $3,480.00 $400.00 1 $4,800.00 $325.00 1 $3,900.00
20. 1 LS STRIPING AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS $9,500.00 $9,500.00 $9,800.00 $9,800.00 $11,600.00 $11,600.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00
21. 2 EA INSTALL SIGNS (MEASURE I SIGN SEE SPECS) $800.00 1 $1,600.00 $820.00 $1,640.00 $1,000.00 $2,000.00 $800.00 $1,600.00
22. 220 LN INSTALL 6' CHAIN LINK FENCE (ON TOP OF SLOUGH $57.00 $12,540.00 $29.00 $6,380.00 $30.00 $6,600.00 $35.00 $7,700.00
23. 1 LS TRAFFIC CONTROL $21,000.00 $21,000.00 $6,500.00 $6,500.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00
I ~
TO"1'AL $417,900.00 $418,448.50 I $419,383.00 $429,630.00
V
Page 3 00
131D SUbID1ARY FOR BlD OPENING Febraury 13, 2007
Church Street Pavement Rehabilitation and Widening
Silvia Construction, Inc.
Sully-Miller Contracting
Company
Vance Corporation
Grand I'acilic
Contractors, Inc.
UNIT UNIT UNIT' UNIT
NO TY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST' AMOUN'C COST AMOUN'C
1. I LS $73,830.00 $73,830.00 $67,250.001 $67,250.00 $81,000.001 $81,000.00 $70,000.001 $70,000.00
2. 1310 TONS ASPHALT RUBBER HOT MIX (ARHM)INCLUDINGCRA $88.401 $I1S,804.00 $107.00 $140,]70.00 $93.00 $121,830.00 $100.85 $132,113.50
3. 681 'I'ONS ASPHALT CONCRETE $81.001 $SS,16L00 $97.00 $66,OS7.00 $84.00 $57,204.00 $89.30 $0,0,813.30
4. 920 'I'ONS CRUSHEDAGG.BASE $33.001 $30,360.00 $42.001 $38,640.00 $35.001 $32,200.00 $67.SOI $62,100.00
S. 3400 SY COLD PLANING $2.40 $8,160.00 $3.50 $11,900.00 $3.50 $11,900.00 $3.601 $12,240.00
G. 470 LF CONSTRUCT PCC CURB AND GUTTER PER CITY STD $40.30 $18,941.00 $28.00 $13,160.00 $2S.S0 $11,985.00 $35.001 $16,450.00
7. I LS CONSTRUCT 12' DRIVE APPROACH PER CITY STD. D $4,469.70 $4,469.70 $1,OS0.00 $t,OS0.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $8,000.001 $8,000.00
8. 2200 SF CONSTRUCT PCC S' WIDE SIDE WALK CITYSTD.D $6.30 $13,860.00 $S.SOI $12,100.00 $S.SO $12,100.00 $S.2S $11,SSOAO
9. 220 LF cONSTRUCicONGSLOUGHwnu(2-COURSEIPERCITY $67.25 $14,795.00 $69.001 $15,180.00 $42.00 $9,240.00 $90.001 $19,800.00
10. 1 EA CONSTRUCT PCC SINGLE HANDICAP RAMP PER CI $2,421.001 $2,421.00 $1,200.00 $1,200.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $3,SOO.OOI $3,500.00
11. 80 LF INSTALL 1-3 DIA. AND 1~' DIA. SCH. 40 PVC SLEEVE ( $76.501 $6,120.00 $86.00 $6,880.00 $93.001 $7,440.00 $86.25 $6,900.00
12. 80 LP INSTALL 3" DIA. ELECT. CONDUIT WITH PULL ROPE '$68.25 $5,460.00 $95.00 $7,600.00 $101.001 $8,080.00 $74.75 $5,980A0
13. 300 LF ST LT CONDUIT INSTALLATION (TRENCHING AND CO $45.40 $13,620.00 $24.00 $7,200.00 $25.001 $7,500.00 $57.501 $17,250.00
14. 8 EA 16 GAL. TREE (PYRUS KAWAKAMI'EVERGREEN PE $452.001 $3,616.00 $200.00 $1,600.00 $480.00 $3,840.00 $225.00 $1,800.00
IS. 9 gA 1s GAL TREE (MAGNOLIA GRAND "SAINT MARY"(ALONG
CHURCH ST $452.001 $4,068.00 $200.00 $1,800.00 $480.00 1 $4,320.00 $225.00 $2,025.00
16. 2600 SF PLANT SOD AT THE PARKWAY AREA $2.101 $5,460.00 $2.7S I $7,IS0.00 $2.25 $S,8S0.00 $3.50 1 $9,100.00
17. 1 LS INSTALL IRRIGATION LINES, HEADS, CONTROLVALV $14,669.00 $14,669.00 $14,500.00 $14,500.00 $16,000.00 $16,000.00 $16,000.00 $16,000.00
]8. 20 L"A ADJUST TO GRADE (WATER; GAS VALVE) $54.00 $1,080.00 $225.00 $4,500.00 $75.00 $1,500.00 $500.00 $10,000.00
19. 12 L'A ADJUST MANHOLE TO GRADE $387.00 1 $4,644.00 $500.00 $6,000.00 $350.00 1 $4,200.00 $750.00 1 $9,000.00
20. I LS STRIPING AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS $9,7SS.00 $9,7SS.00 $14,000.00 $14,000.00 $11,000.00 $11,000.00 $1S,98S.00 $LS,98S.00
21~. 2 EA INSTALL SIGNS (MEASURE 1 SIGN SEE SPECS) $900.00 1 $1,800.00 $SS0.00 $1,700.00 $900.00 $1,800.00 $2,000.00 $4,000.00
22. 220 LF INSTALL 6' CHAIN LINK FENCE (ON TOP OF SLOUGH $42.80 $9,416.00 $36.00 $7,920.00 $31.00 1 $6,820.00 $46.00 $10,120.00
23. I LS TRAFFIC CONTROL $12,940.00 $12,940.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $44,000.00 1 $44,000.00 $22,500.00 $22,500.00
'1'O"CAL $430,449.70 $4S7,SS7.00 I $466,809.00 $527,226.80
v
V
Page 4 ~
STAFF REPORT
EA`G SNEERING DEPdRTD4ENT
Date: March 7, 2007
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Council
From: William J. ONeil, City Engineer
By: Tasha Hunter, Public Service Tech I
RANCHO
CUCAMONGA
Subject: ACCEPT IDIPROVEMENTS, RETAIN $2,320.00 OF THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE
CASH DEPOSIT IN LIEU OF A MAINTENANCE BOND AND FILE A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEi1'IENTS FOR DRC2002-00922, LOCATED AT THE
EAST SIDE OF FAH2WAY VIEW PLACE, SOUTH OF 6TH STREET, SUBMITTED BY
FAIRWAY BUSINESS CENTER ON MILLIKEN
RECOMMENDATION:
The required improvements for Fairway Business Center on Milliken have been completed in an acceptable
manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer
to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to retain $2,320.00 of the Faithful Performance
Cash Deposit in lieu of a Maintenance Bond.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
As a condition of approval of completion of DRC2002-00922, located at the east side of Fairway View Place,
south of 6th Street, the applicant was required to complete street improvements. The improvements have
been completed and it is recommended that the City Council retain a portion of the Faithful Performance
Cash Deposit in lieu of a Maintenance Bond.
Respectfully submitted,
_,
William J, O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:TCH
P80
Attachment(s)
P81
:~.;~`
ARROW - "ROUTE
~: -.
EMPIRE LAK€S
GOLF COURSE
~.,
:~
S! TE ::
a 6TH
Z ST.
Q
NORTH
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ENGIlJEER.ING DIV~ION
.~ 15
~,
`w. .STi/ ST:
Q~ 47H STREET
w
\~, Y
S ~
,.
10
G~
rr~: l~Gb2-D09?2
zTrr~: !/,~C~T~Y ~~
~I~IT:
P82
RESOLUTION N0. D ! - ~`S~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR
DRC2002-00922 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF
A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
WHEREAS, the construction. of public improvements for DRC2002-00922
have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the
work is complete.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is
authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of
San Bernardino County.
STAFF REPORT
ENGINEERING DEP.-1RTMENT
Date: March 7, 2007
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
From: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
By: Tasha Hunter, Public Service Tech I
P83
f ',
RANCHO
CUCAMONGA
Subject: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND FOR TRACT 16312, LOCATED
ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD AND CHURCH
STREET, SUBMITTED BY VICTORIA ARBORS, LLC
RF.COMMENVDATION
It is recommended that City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond, for
Trac[ 16312, located on the northwest comer of Day Creek Boulevard and Church Street, submitted by
Victoria Arbors, LLC
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects in
materials and workmanship.
DEVELOPER
Release:
Respectfully submitted,
Victoria Arbors, LLC
255 East Rincon, Ste. # 200
Corona, Ca 92678
Maintenance Guarantee Bond #0864 1809-M $65,810.00
i G' '~~~
Wi liam J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJOach
Attachment
P84
€4
8
$~
9
A
t~~
t~
~'
~~
STAFF REPORT
P85
,,
ENGINEERING DEPdRTbIENT
Date: March 7, 2007
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
From: William J. ONeil, City Engineer
By: Tasha Hunter, Public Service Tech I
RANCHO
C,UCAMONGA
Subject: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOArD FOR TRACT 16370, LOCATED
ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF CHURCH STREET AND ARBOR LANE,
SUBMITTED BY STANDARD PACIFIC AND US HOMES CORPORATIONS
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond, for
Tract 16370, located on the northwest comer of Church Street and Arbor Lane, submitted by Standard Pacific
and US Homes Corporations
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the sffeet improvements remain free from defects in
materials and workmanship.
DEVELOPER Standard Pacific Corp.
255 E. Rincon St., Ste. #200
Corona, Ca 92879
US Homes Corp.
391 N. Main St., Ste # 300
Corona, Ca 92880
Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond
"Standard Pacific Corporatiod'
Maintenance Guarantee Bond
"US Homes Corporation"
Respectfully submitted,
Wil iam J. O'Neil
City Engineer
#08742457-A $49,370.00
#624345 8-0001 540, 240.00
WJO:tch
Attachment
P86
i
#!
STAFF REPORT
ENGINEERING DEP.-1RTAIENT
Date: March 7, 2007
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
From: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
By: Tasha Hunter, Public Service Tech I
RANCHO
C,UCAMONGA
Subject: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND FOR TRACT 16371, LOCATED
ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF VICTORIA PARK LANE AND BASE LINE
ROAD, SUBMITTED BY US HOMES CORPORATION
It is recommended that City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond,.for
Tract 16371, located on the southwest comer of Victoria Park Lane and Base Line Road, submitted by US
Homes Corporation
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects in
materials and workmanship.
DEVELOPER US Homes Corporation
391 North Main Street, Ste. # 300
Corona, Ca 92880
Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond #6231642-0001
Respectfully submitted,
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJOach
$52,170.00
P87
Attachment
P88
STAFF REPORT
ENGINEERING DEP.jRT1IENT
Date: March 7, 2007
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
From: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
;'f~
RANCHO
C,UCAMONGA
By: Cindy Hackett, Associate Engineer (`~
Subject: RELEASE OF FAITHFUL PERFO`R'MANCE BOND 7573826 IN THE AMOUNT OF
$998,694.00, FOR THE 2005/2006 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION -
OVERLAY OF VARIOUS STREETS, CONTRACT NO. 05-074
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release Faithful Performance
Bond No. 7573826 in the amount of $998,694.00 for the 2005/2006 Local Street Pavement
Rehabilitation - Overlay of Various Streets, Contract No. 05-074.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free
from defects in materials and workmanship.
Contractor: Laird Construction
9460 Lucas Ranch Road
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Respectfully submitted,
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:CH:Is
P89
Attachments
~:
VICINITY MAP
MAP-"A"
r L MAP-"B„
MAP-" C"
rr
HOUNDIRY LNd
~'~ ~~ II III ~II I~ w
l\\
I:
~ e
~.~
Y~~
~°~
UPLAND
iq
LEGEND:
STREET FOR REHAB.
(ac. oveRU~
~.
r^
..~.,.e..- ~
_~ ~' FONTANA
~ .~ _
C
•LSSf RR
MAP-» J» ~~~..
-MAP- "' I"
} KTA
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA f` •,,
FY 2005/06 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION '`~ N~
A.C. OVERLAY x.r.s.
T.
:<.
P91
,z
T H E C I T Y O F
RANCt10 CGCAPt O\'GA
Staff Report
DATE: March 7, 2007
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: James Troyer, AICP, Planning Director
BY: Douglas Fenn, Associate Planner, MPA
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
AMENDMENT DRC2005-01008 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request
to change the Development District from Industrial Park (Subarea 7) to General
Commercial (to reflect' the current General Plan Designation of General
Commercial), located at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and
Rochester Avenue - APN: 0229-021-31 and 32. Related Files: Conditional Use
Permit DRC2005-01084 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17818.
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt a
Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts and approve Development District
Amendment DRC2005-01008.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The proposed Code Amendment from Industrial Park (Subarea 7),
to General Commercial will make the subject site compatible with the current General Plan
designation of General Commercial. The properties to the northwest and west (Masi Plaza) are
also designated as General Commercial and the District Amendment proposal will be in
compliance with the existing and recently approved commercial retail uses in the surrounding
area. The proposed Code reclassification and development project will not create any conflicts
with the existing land uses in the area and will be consistent with the land use designation of the
General Plan for the site.
The District Maps in Section 17.30.030 - A and 17.30.080 -I of the Development Code will be
modified to reflect the deletion of the project site from Industrial Park (Subarea7). Staff has
attached exhibits of the existing General Pan and District Map of the proposed District Map
change and other map exhibits that reflect the deletion of the subject site from Industrial Park
(Subarea7).
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act
("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the
potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial
Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to biological
P92
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DRC200S01008 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES
March 7, 2007
Page 2
resources, cultural resources, hydrology and water quality, noise, air quality, and geology and
soils, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on
the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared.
Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to
adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been
prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the
project.
CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily
Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners
within a 660-foot radius of the project site to properties to the north, south, east, and west.
CONCLUSION: The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on January 24, 2007,
and recommended that the City Council adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration and approve the
proposed Development District Amendment DRC2005-01008.
Respectfully submitted,
Jame .Troyer, AICP
Planning Director
JRT:DF
Attachments: Exhibit A - Development District Amendment Revision -Existing General Plan
and Zoning District maps and proposed District map change, and other
map exhibits that reflect the deletion of the subject site from Industrial
Park (Subarea 7)
Exhibit B - Planning Commission Staff Report dated January 24, 2007
Exhibit C - Initial Study Parts I and II
Exhibit D - Planning Commission Minutes dated January 24, 2007
Exhibit E - Planning Commission Resolution Recommending Approval of
Development District Amendment DRC2005-01008
Draft Ordinance of Approval for Development District Amendment DRC2005-01008
m
Development Review DRC2005-01008
(existing General Plan Designation)
Foothill Blvd
i
L
~,
..
E.
~ ...
,.
I
\ ~. ~.
~~
,E ~\
~.
.~
~*
~~
5
d
Q
L
d
d
V
~,
`~ ~~ `
~_...3._.~ .A .1_-.,a
,,
Development Review DRC2005-01008
(existing Zoning Designation)
Community Commercial
~. (Terra Vista FC)
Foothill Blvd
j Industrial Park.
;Subarea 7 ~!
+ ~, ,,
JI _)
I ~ ~ - --
\ J-
~ ~ , ~,--~
,tit ~~ ~ `\
~\ ~ \ \~ \ ~
4
~~,'. `` ~
t~ ~\\~
~~. \ \\~~
\~
-,~ ~-
.~
-:, _.~~.
Development Review DRC2005-01008
(proposed Zoning Designation)
~Gommunity Commercial
(Terra Vista PGj
Foothill Blvd
Industrial Park
Subarea 7
\ .```~
\ ~~.
~\ '~. \
~~ ,~~ ~.
\~
`~~~ , ~
~`
~'- ~ ~,- `~ pia ~
~ :
'~T
~~
{
~
~ ,
(~ ~
~ti
'y
... y
_. _~_ ~a ~
1
~~ r
Q
L
d
0
N
P96
Rancho C~rcamonoa Development Code
FIGURE 17.30.030-A
v_
H
N
~
Q
Y
Q
J
j
U
J
~
y ~ Q
~ J
a
~ = N 6
~ w
~~~ ~~
~ ~
m S c
= Z
(7 =
'i <
S K W
7 O b
~~~ C
~
Section 17.30.030
O m m O O r
m 0 m P ? ~
r ^rnrr
O o `
01NO.OON
O
m
Q
m
17.30-9 6/99
P97
Rancho
Section 17.30.080
FIGURE 17.30.080-I
Z 5
17.30-81
fl
~ ~ $
~~~ ~l~~
][T Q O
~ ~
+}
L ~ •
Eyr
~~ ~ •~
~
o+p
o i ^ ~
~ ~i
~
B:C~ t to
3 ~~
S C E yEC 1
I +}
I
~
~ I I I }y
~ 1
1 ~
~
t EP
I ~t
6/99
P98
r.~~ ,_z~
y'~
~'
T H E C I T Y O F
-1
f2 A~ C U O C U C A ht O ~' G A
Staff Report
DATE: January 24, 2007
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director
BY: Douglas Fenn, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
AMENDMENT DRC2005-01008 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request
to change the Development District from Industrial Park (Subarea 7) to General
Commercial (to reflect the current General Plan Designation of General
Commercial), located at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester
Avenue -APN: 0229-021-31 and 32. Related Files: Conditional Use Permit
DRC2005-01084 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17818. This item will be
forwarded to the City Council for final action.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
SUBTPM17818 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to subdivide
12.66 net acres of land into 6 parcels for commercial and professional office
purposes designated as General Commercial and within the District of Industrial
Park (Subarea 7), located at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and
Rochester Avenue -APN: 0229-021-31 and 32. Related Files: Conditional Use
Permit DRC2005-01084 and Development District Amendment DRC2005-01008.
Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for
consideration.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
DRC2005-01084 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES -The development of a
master plan for an office and commercial center consisting of one bank with
drive-thru at 4,500 square feet (Building A); one drive-thru restaurant at
2,430 square feet (Building B); two restaurant buildings totaling 13,000 square feet
(Buildings C and E); one retail multi-tenanUrestaurant building at 5,100 square feet
(Building D); and atwo-story 39,400 square foot office (Building F) on 12.66 net
acres of land designated as General Commercial and within the District of
Industrial Park (Subarea 7), located at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard
and Rochester Avenue -APN: 0229-021-31 and 32. Related Files: Tentative
Parcel Map SUBTPM17818 and Development District Amendment
DRC2005-01008. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of
anvirnnmantal impacts for consideration.
EXHIBIT B
P99
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DRC2005-01008, SUBTPM17818, AND DRC2005-01084 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES
January 24, 2007
Page 2
PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning:
North -Vacant land; Community Commercial (Subarea 6)
South -Vacant land; Industrial Park District (Subarea 7)
East -Open Space; Edison Utility Corridor
West -Industrial Park (Subarea 7)
B. General Plan Designations:
Project Site -General Commercial
North -Community Commercial
South -General Commercial
East -Flood Control/Utility Corridor
West -General Commercial and Open Space
C. Site Characteristics: The site is rectangular in shape and is comprised of two parcels. It is
vacant with sparse vegetation and weeds covering the majority of the site and has evidence of
discing for weed abatement purposes. To the north of Foothill Boulevard is the recently
approved commercial center DRC2005-00365; to the south is vacant land with a professional
office project that was approved by the Planning Commission on December 13, 2006; to the
east is an Edison Power Line Corridor; to the northwest is the Aggazzotti home, formerly a
winery and designated Historic Point of Interest (not a part of the project); and the Masi Plaza
commercial center is across the street on Rochester Avenue.
Parking: The project is parked per the parking criteria of the Development Code and the
tabulation of the required parking spaces is as follows:
Type of Building Use
and Square footage Required
Parking Amount Provided
Parking
Building A Bank with drive-thru
4,500 square feet 18 parking spaces ~ 1/250 18 parking spaces
Building B Drive-thru restaurant 2,430 square feet 32 spaces ~ 1l75
32 parking spaces
Building C Restaurant 6,000 square feet 60 spaces O 1/100 61 parking spaces
Building D Multi-tenant
Retail/Restaurant 5,100 square feet Non-fast food restaurant
~ 1/100
51 parking spaces
Building E Restaurant 7,000 square feet 60 parking spaces ~ 1/100 and 18 ~ 1/55 78 parking spaces
Building F Office Building 39,400 square feet 158 parking spaces -Medical office is ~ 1/250 158 parking spaces
P100
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DRC2005-01008, DRC2005-01084, AND SUBTPM17818-CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES
January 24, 2007
Page 3
The applicant also proposes a valet parking pick-up and drop-off area that is off-set from the
main drive aisle. The applicant proposes to have the valet parking service in the evening
hours; the parking will be in a portion of the office parking lot, so as to not adversely affect the
retail required parking. The valet drop-off and pick-up area will be cordon off from the retail
parking and clearly identified as such. The intended valet drop-off and pick-up area is
planned to be located in front of the proposed retail building and has been designed to reflect
such a concept. Additionally, the applicant shows outdoor patio dining areas, and when a
tenant has signed a lease, the parking for the outdoor parking will be included as part of the
required spaces and tabulated to meet the Development Code requirement.
ANALYSIS:
A. Development District Amendment:
The proposed Code Amendment from Industrial Park (Subarea 7) to General Commercial will
make the subject site compatible with the current General Plan designation of General
Commercial. The properties to the northwest and west (Masi Plaza) are also designated as
General Commercial, and the District Amendment proposal will be in compliance with the
existing and recently approved commercial retail uses in the surrounding area. The proposed
Code reclassification and development project will not create any conflicts with the existing
land uses in the area and will be consistent with the land use designation of the General Plan
for the site.
The District Maps in Section 17.30.030 - A and 17.30.080 -I of the Development Code will be
modified to reflect the deletion of the project site from Industrial Park (Subarea 7). Staff has
attached exhibits of the existing General Plan and District Map of the proposed District Map
change and other map exhibits that reflect the deletion of the subject site from Industrial Park
(Subarea 7) (Exhibit A).
B. Parcel Map:
In conjunction with the development proposal, the applicant has submitted a tentative parcel
map division to reflect the development site layout. Each parcel will contain a building along
with the required on-site parking. The Development Code exempts the project from the
minimum parcel size requirements because it is a master planned development.
C. Development Proposal:
The proposed master plan project, with its mix of office, retail, and restaurants, will have a
synergy consistent with the commercial/office corridor of Foothill Boulevard. The five
retail/restaurant and bank buildings front along Foothill Boulevard. The two-story office
building faces Rochester Avenue. There is one main entrance off Rochester Avenue for the
professional office building (Building F), and two ingress/egress accesses are provided off
Foothill Boulevard: the first just east of the Aggazzotti residence, and the second at the
eastern property line. The eastern Foothill Boulevard access will line up with the new
signalized median break that was recently approved for the northerly commercial project
DRC2005-00365. There is a plaza between Buildings C, D, and E that is visible from
Foothill Boulevard.
P101
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DRC2005-01008, DRC2005-01084, AND SUBTPM17818-CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES
January 24, 2007
Page 4 .
The property is designated as a "Suburban Parkway Enhancement Area" by the Route 66
Visual Improvement Plan. The proposed Landscape Plan reflects these required elements,
including special parkway and street pavement treatments.
The applicant has also included two decorative pilasters that are visible from
Foothill Boulevard and two decorative Route 66 monument pedestrian gateway structures on
the north and the side of the multi-retail and restaurant Building (D). Building D is also flanked
by an abundant amount of Date Palm trees, many are aesthetically arranged in front of the
building.
The multi-retail and restaurant Building D is the only building that was submitted with an
elevation plan and will be the architectural standard by which all the other commercial
buildings will have to comply with. The exterior building skin of the commercial buildings will
contain Dalitle Grigio ceramic wall tiles, clear anodized aluminum window frames, grey tint
Pilkington storefront glazing, Vintage wood Madera concrete file roofing, and Tumbleweed
Ledge stone veneer (which has been changed to a rounded smooth veneer. The two-story
office building is rectangular in shape with subtle recessed arch elements at the base and
protruding vertical metallic rectangle shaped columns that exceed the height of the primary
roofline on the east and west sides of the building. Metal silver colored, trellis-like sun shade
canopies are over the entry ways. There is also interplay of a concrete arch that is designed
with reveal cuts on the north and south side of the building. The materials of the building are
blue/green tinted reflective glass, clear anodized aluminum mullions, Pietra Di Luserna
ceramic tiles, and a complimentary color schedule of grey, desert and off-white paint finish.
D. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (McPhail, Stewart, and Coleman)
reviewed the site, building elevations, materials, and Conceptual Landscaping Plans on
November 14, 2006, and instructed the applicant to make the recommended changes as
outlined by staff. On December 19, 2006, the applicant had addressed the outstanding design
issues and the project was brought back to the Design Review Committee as a Consent Item.
The Committee (McPhail, Stewart, Diaz) complimented the applicant on their redesign and
recommended approval to the Planning Commission. A condition of approval incorporating
the Committee's recommendations has been included in the proposed Resolution of Approval.
E. Grading Review Committee: The Grading Committee reviewed the development portion of
the project on November 14, 2006, and recommended approval.
F. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA")
and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential
environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City
staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to biological
resources, cultural resources, hydrology and water quality, noise, air quality, and geology and
soils, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect
on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was
prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the
intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also
been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for
the project.
P102
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DRC2005-01008, DRC2005-01084, AND SUBTPM17818-CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES
January 24, 2007
Page 5
CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily
Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within
a 300-foot radius of the project site.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tentative Parcel
Map SUBTPM17818 and Development Review DRC2005-01084 through adoption of the attached
Resolutions of Approval with Conditions and with issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of
environmental impacts. Staff also recommends Development District Amendment DRC2005-01008
be forwarded to the City Council for final action.
Respectfully submitted,
J
James R. Troyer, AICP
Planning Director
JRT:DF/ge
Attachments: Exhibit A -Development District Amendment Revisions -- Existing General Pan and
Zoning District maps and proposed District map change and other map
exhibits that reflect the deletion of the subject site from Industrial Park
(Subarea7)
Exhibit B Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17818
Exhibit C -Site Utilization Plan
Exhibit D -Site Plan
Exhibit E -Grading Plans
Exhibit F -Building Elevations and Floor Plans
Exhibit G -Landscape Plan
Exhibit H -Design Review Action Comments dated November 14, and
December 19, 2006
Exhibit I -Initial Study Parts I and II
Draft Resolution of Approval for Development District Amendment DRC2005-01008
Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17818
Draft Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2005-01084
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP No. 17818
PORTIONS OF LOTS 111 ANO 114 OF MAP OF ROCHESTER IN THE CUV OF RANCHO
WCAMONGA, AS SHONM BV MAP ON FILE IN BOON 9, PAGE(S) 40 OF MAPS, IN THE
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN BERNAROINO, CALIFORNIA
-,`, ~~
y --~
DEDICATIOtY
I
l ~I -~
~~ (1J~
T\i~
~.i I ~_-
~- I~~
`~'
P~00~5
P
'/0rz"ins
ACCESSMILITY EASEMENT
OEHIME/(AViE "~
r. ~v®w~.~vnwecv.~w-ur.o.<.,.... ... m mer -....., .~..
FUTURE UYOU~~ iiY OT FIBS-~
/~ vy.GE\\~s ~~
ar4.
rt. uerm P pG I~_ . uom ~
r
A
SCALE 1"=50'
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA vcmrsmw
• -m¢ NM1LII~Y
a
1We1FR 8fAMF
g11EA ®I41LE
6Li lRC~N'I~
war
1MILR.LL fM959fMfF
fAEiRVI£LIKW rmr¢v mix[r
(NO LEE'O6Yi'{V.W m~u rw
1LCNL GE4RP)b/:
~
Wm~m[er i
rK n m mo+~Wn
tSSES¢~xSnAV~
9N
~
.
'
.
. °°'mr-v-o-om
oxroc
/ umm
/ APIVGV2 ~
/
' ex~ a n m
FOOTCHESTER w..u~~fi
u (-
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 17818 ~" O-
,~ W-
rn
X
2
[/~
ZONE CC
ZONE ZC aCRA VISiA
ZONE OC
FOpiHILL BOULEVPRO
1 ZONE IP-7
S
ZONE IP ]
ZONE GI SUO MEA 8
IXAa\71 reoo ~I~
m-xro l-~ I-T~
NO1 A PARi~ ^ ~ ^ a
~nn~ri/ ~I-ll
SITE
~E IP-]
0
20NE IP-7
ZONE OS
ZONE RRO/C
ZONE OS ZONE NCiORIA PC
~ i
0
&
8
`
o
C
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA olc~m ~S-algSaG-Enelnaa~lnE
o a -~_-_,~_ eamllm~ AE ,a ~:,.I ~,~ :.: i~I N,.'.~T
ZONE NCiORa PC ~
ZONE RRO/C
r
N
FOOTGHESTER ~~ ~.
SITE UTILIZATION MAP ~~ p.
I°° ° A
~.. r ...,w:n..,.e.,. w....., _
05
0
z
w
w
J
u
Z
r
z
5
C
2
f
J
w
a
8 7 i j ? 1 =_ f 1 ~ ~
:. _ _j _ - 4
,. _ a_ a e x r _
3 s 9 t
E
~ ~ I ~
3 C AS A ~ !~ :
~ ~ i ! ~ j
~ ~ !
' !~ ~~ ~
7i ~ t E ~ I
s
S
I
i
a Ij ~ 1 !~
}
0
t l a a
~ { § } ~ 's !
ai ',
4 SS 1
J IIII I I II II II
;
Y
~oo
U
®
*o
o• ~
o~~
rl ~~ 111
,,~,
1
~i le !j !? ! !i f!
1
~ i;
ii is !, ~i ;? 1 !!
~~ > ~, E, , ~, ~~ i.
~a,s!il!_It,l!!!
!j fJ i! ~! ~~ ij! II
!, ~~ ~~ 13 ~, ! it it
----------_-fi-
C~
W
~6 c
9~ o
G
o~ V
~a
~~
Z
s~ i
F >
'F m
~~
e
1 ~ {~! i 11V !I~ lull II
I_Iy iii ~ l~ lll, l;;l~ ilk ~ ;
1 9
~ e
;,, ,., .l
. .
3
ly; i
1, jl# i
Il? 1
9 ! { i a_o
I9~ i
9„` ~ , 9
~e ~ ~ e
~
a e -
s
~
g v
tl
„ gs 9
i ~
>
l
l
\ " ~`~
s m
Q ~
E
$ SE
LL'.
E
$ cN N
~
~ o
V
l\ t~
\ ^J 3
`P i
u~~ Y'
;
Y
a
1 4
i
e
s 3 m
7
e~ m
e n
3 2 '2'
j
`\\ ~ £ ~ ^
\~ ~~ ` y
9
m
.4 ~ g W.v
° y
b 7
s~ ~ 6 ?
eB4 ~ ~~ <
rp `m
c
'.
~ Y R
~
9
~
a '
-_ A
z d
I
~
~ ~
yl{ R'
O
V
O'
0
3 ~
6 e ~ 3
g
~
g
~~~~
` ~' .
s
l m
.~6' 0~!8 a S
H V
n
~ s` y
~ `m
'
'
1 `~
u ~ 0
~
'rxl
b b
~
~ O
C
L
ti m
C l~ n
V 4
h
Ly
o
'~ h
°o
~~ N
O~
~a
z
a
w
a
U
O
2
5
a
a
z
J
W
K
a
`III °'~=~~
~[~~
:III =atas~
S
3~3
a
C V o
a ~n
'o -
e°°~
d~a
.. a
~ < ~
a ~
iJ
h
~8R
x'~~p
"z u`~
]~~y5~~
>pKr
HIlA3Ad~I3LS8H~Oi1 ~-`- :.~ ~e_ -_
_ _ 9
.. _..__ _- S= __
~~`. _ 5
P
-=~8 a o
eo~~ ~ ~ i ~~ I' o
a n o .I - _> ~~~~ ~
~ m
F z ~ I ~~~ 1 m
w ~ ~~ v,. ~`~~ ~~ ' .g m
a
O ~ ~
5 D - _J a ~ ~ In ^~ Z
~ ~ __~ 4; Rg~ VA~\
m .. ~^, v 4 ~ R ~'
5 ~ A ~~~~~
3 § 'e' y %~ l I\ O it
m .: ~ a
y b .g/L
IYvv~~44ee++~~~ I
z ~ ~l~/l I
I- P ~' ~
~a
i ~ -' ~ ~- 3
~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ - or ~ ~~~ ~
~ E s
IIO sn
/~~.ol LJ ~o4 rL ~~~ ~i
.. .- ~._ ~. A~
~. ~ a
y . ~ .
a
o ,O ~~ :ax
xO a`a ~.~ ~. .~( ~ to R egg~~ '4~
C ~ ~ `~•~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~
2 ~ O _ I ~~~~--*~~~5-1-~-~'',~ I~ e~ ~~
x q
c pppg gg
5 n -7 5
N NO- a S~ i - ~ n ~YRF ® ~~ ~ fi
~ R
°aa ~ V~ ., ~ ~--~ ~ ^ gds ~~ r ~
__ ` I & E ~ a
°o V °-
`~/
4 /~ _ _
6 e
a 4 ~ ~
6
I ~ V b
N I ~ ~~ ~
O ~q4
~ 1" _ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ a' ~. ~ ~~
.~ _
.s
V __
~ __ ROCHESTER AVENUE . ~ ~ R
- ..._.._.. ~' ~s G .._.
z , ay ~ °
\\ m
0
i b
m ~ ~ J+r;, ~? ~
F€ m I^? hj?tt~ c i
Z ~~ ~ .. r ~
a ~
3 ` ~ sae/ :, ~ ~ ~ n ,y Z .lKl
b _
~ ~ ~
4~~~FY III ~ II ~ ~ 4 a I~. . ~_ i r \\ D w I.
t3 ~~s, III o ° b ~ act ~ ~ i Gam!( =R'1"I' .~rT~. I ~J L'
r ~"
~v~
106
0
a
#
.~
[
e E R
/ r
a'E
y
:
,
y
41~, ~ _ -V. -._ of ~ q ~tio
- \ ~~ '
~
~-~
~ ~F li ~i~~
~ ~,~ ~u ~rlii
.~.~ ~
..~
CONCEPTUAL SOUTH ELEVATION (MUR-TENANT RESTAURANT BLDG) ° 7 CONCEPTUAL EAST ELEVATION (MUR-TENANT RESTAURAM BLDG) ° 1
///~~~ S
~
#
yy
e
vRY..+.L
e 0 fm.t p jl
~ ~.7c
_
'J Q .C3'+n- ~ ~ - ~ =L LI _ _ . ~ ~ L ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~# ~ ~1 ~ ~I l _ _ E, '~ - - 4 t,5 ~` 59
r,rj.
~ f
~ d}
0 a.w, ~ ~ ~ I
W
~#
~ y
~ I
(
I
/I I
I yt r
IH~
JI
I I ~
I
t 1 ~
~y r * y
~
I S~ Ny
1 i~...,-g '
~ ~ .
I
\
I
'
~' ~.. Ll_~I~L~ I
/
~
~
~
J_tl- ILIl~ I$ ~ ~tM i
~
I. ~ ~ ~ 1 _ i
~j~
¢
CONCEPTUAL NORRi ELEVATION (MUR-TENAM RESTAURANT BLDG) ° 8 CONCEPTUAL WEST ELEVATION (MUTI-TENANT RESTAURANT BLDG) ° 2 4 g
~
.,.. ~,..~ 4d9
CB~ ~ &~~
....o.~,,..,....m
1... ..N....,...
...
.~:;~K
~
w
.
..:::,
~
~
_ _ e ,~~_ ~
l '
I i `.~
_ ~
.
.
W
M
~ ~
I I
' +' 'U -~ - ~
'
'
II' ~' `
_....a..
y~ CA-3
CONCEPTUAL BUILINNG SECTION (MUR-TENANT RESTAURANT BLDG) ° 9 E%TERIOR FWISH 3
I-~DULE
P108
~ m
+
m
O rr
I I^~
I\
O
~ (}~
I I\
m I ~
m
~? I x ~ . Ii_
~ `
I ,~
o ' n ~ o T
9 D i J ili'
m :~:3 m
1_I -':-':-:
~
~ ~
y ~ 1, ~ ~ I dl~
{{- D
:y: O
- _ ~ i4
I .
4~ ~~ ~~ ~r i '. _
~
I 1
I I ~~ I
II ~~ ( I
I
,-~
~
~I
~ .
~ _
iu I
~
. o
IIIIIIIIL I II!glilll lll~~ ~ .
~ _ Illllllll . ,..I II 1111111 191 I' ~ ~ < <
~
•
~
_
C
~I I
~ •_
I
IIII II I ! II I
I III - ~ I I IIL II - ;:, III IIIIII IIII~ ~~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ _ ~ I _ _ ~a.L n 1
I 1 -. i ++-; lid
i II
-
f
- .
.
LI
~
~ -- ~ ; -~ 0`s , , .~~ i
~+
-
~ ! ~
@i ~
i t om =.
~ _ i
~ -
``~
l
i '~ `.ll
~l i
~.
i ~
..
~ I . ~ I
~~
I
~ I ~ ~ I „
~ , . i
I
~
~~
~~ I I ~ I N '
I I I I! LI
I ~ ~~
I
.I II ~
1 I
I
i i~ !
r I
JjI
~~r~a
~~~
~~
-
I
~~1~
~-
~I
~,
i I j j~lli
; r~~r~~
,~ ~
~!1,
~ -
ii
~;
~
~
i
~
d _
~
~
a~
i
~ ~r
I
~
I
_
5
B ~4Y. &i
igg,
~a
i~3'i FN ~° ~~ it ~
~I ~I '
~ p i, ipp,
Bi
~ ~
v: n~`a~ii ~~a 'f
. I I
2 2l?2022 ~ I I
I I 2 2 2 22?S7!02 I,
~;! i t
I
. i.ff I I H' n, ~~I I
~
~ ~~ Itl ~' lll II'll I I I. ~li~ ~ P~ I IIII II II`,:~p _I a I ~--~
I I
I
1I
f
I I
f (Jf II
I
li a
Iii
r
I
~ J~
JI
J(i d
~
P ;' xi a! ~i~~ lg~ i i ~i ;iE~,, ~i
a 0 2 2 0 222 20 S a 2 2 2 2 02 220
4
W V ~ H
:~yj - m ~ 9 '5666-p • a a; ~: 3c
p Sip {
`y~~6 C
5 { 9
9
y
$9 k
a~, 3
~
a
I;
i
~ J ~
` ~ ll .5 23`,
d d
° i [~
`~ ~
~
- - - - & ~ 1
'. .~
g
rN rr ~
~ ~~ O d' Si S
y
z
~9e ~~Fa
~¢y 6%s' 4
4'
~
~3B{~6
I I
~3i`s "'6£)
~ ~yF~ 5' i'~'°;~ayi5 9F~=y,°a, Ag ~i `~
~ y
i
€
:~~~r~~y°9~ ~
@a
~F c~p~isg a
{ jj
alp ] i¢ B~ai F_ Lf f } E~~ ' ~ rtl
5 AS{{ 3i $" i~
ii
F5
ff~ ~A i
~°F
t
5
i {505 F {~s[2 3a
v5E ~ 3€sz;o ~d ~~
:'&z~ !9
4
~
'
55 ~/,b.
4
# ~ii aRR S
[[#
: p ° i a 6 C{ 6 ~? X e
' 6{
iv sF3
i
~ 3
~F Res ~ m
CF A y
a
:i w
E } LgRtDf ESIEfVpR EIEVAlpNB ~~~ ~
c ~ BIAlDINO BECIION wawn. wnxv.uc. w rmv
~`~
^ ,
P
~=~y~°.a.
V~~ V~m yep
'
~
UWn GW~91
~ ~ ~ _ _
~ ~
~r~w=.s w:oxarz ~ ar>3o3t aus srYOUa3s aus °d' ° i r e
q
g
~ ~
`„,
n ~lem~ °.mmwrre ow
___ ~ _ _~ ~='
vl c>owlv
e M/1e 31181V111d wuve
Q
3JIlW i3 V e
Ofd
®m y ~
y1 - Y v fV L C e 59 $$ , Y Y S ra 1 a P§ ¢ §:
[[ 3£ 5
6
Y Y i y 1 3 a P P 3 55a ~ 5 f
- a 1 y' } ! 34 a a! 3 .i ~
~
~ ~
'OAlO lllhlNf ~
q
f
{
p
t
~<
EI Sy~P~gaeyD3 ;~I SaRYYYI LS^.,§FP3 zY~-S.6°'~[[~O~Sq~ 03P
'v § i i. c °a { ~ ei P ! 5 .. Y:. ~ ¢ S ; '. § s s § ~ § t• ea Y e9 !P 3
sz
s 1
'' §
~ ff S i S ~3
"
°
3 i i
d § 4
§~
S g
~
~~
~ ~
n 5
a
-
,
9e§ §
:
-
9
. a s
R
="
.
!
a S Y 3
§
g§!§§~5 §
I
I i ~ E§.
" `
I
I ~ ~~
I R
p~43e
~
•
II
i I
I e
.~
q
•!~~ ~iae • F
~ a
~~ i
33 S
I I ~
I
3~€€~„age I
,~
q'`~
a
~~
I 3
I I
I
...
_ -' ° I
I
t g i . i§~ I
- ,.e.,...:,.mm
I .- ,... .:..m.,.: €fq it t J _ .._.._.._.._ _ .. -3 ,
~
r
'
' ...,.~~o. ma<M~~n: ~ _
f
05 1 f~~ ae a
1 r
=~~
' '~~ i
1
= eiE
ae~
'
'~
r'; I ~
I
y9 ~
_.
-•- ~
~ ,
°
- 9
' 3d
-q@3 of
~~ a p pp
q~~f Q
~
-
_
~
B
~
~ a -., ,~ `
~~ I ~q _B
i
9
FI J% _._ R an . 8..4_ °. a~e a if (y
I
{
~'
~ ~ I ~
~ 4 i II ARE a~1Gl
~'° i ~ ~ Ille , ,~ I
.
~ l
~ i ~I
f ~~~
des 3n 8e& i
~~a~ s a ~ e
-
_ l I LL ~ i P
I . ~
>
~ ~ 9C Sg
~
° ~ Il
I an ~~ ~ 7 S a F :a3~ c~9=~
x
~ ai f
° I~ ~-. ~• _~ ~ '- i., 3 ~~3Y a Rio N
~ ~
.w i
e~ a : 9 F d_ ~ja
yl' j y
l o •; PB " I° Bc°S~e 4
epep~
1 6
_
O'
~
_
8
~ I
~a_ '-~
§' 81 ° I.
~
ufE
°_
:
e~
~ ~~
~$$
y~; R 4eC ~~ ?
~ ~
eo~~Es ~ 1§
° e
x
a
p
lilt ~ 1 1
EE
§ o s
~.
!t
~
a,.,§
~
-
- JJ I
E_(,.__L_A__~ -~
r
o~
~~c 3i 73 fl
ek
~2e 9 ~~ ~ei
P
:
~ P 3 €t
@
~ Z . ~ ~ ~
I Y7
~ ~ -_
.. .
Fl e
I
--
I ~ .~
61i
IiiIJ~GIIli1~1
16;~Fr i
1~C 1T
~_ s
~~
y
I ~ h
. -
'I x .
I gfl I
_ I t
o u ,
~ a
qh-~ I ll ~ I - a - ~ i - ~ ~ .~
-
I . i ... _
~ .
~. ~~G
e@
~
~ ¢
sE i 9 yyl
i
~
rs
7 -
~ Etl(f
4
~
a
°
Y
h ~q
~ i ,
~~~
~
.ec 3 ~~
3 r
~ ITI _ -~ _ ~
I -
_ I I I I a _
'~ ~Lf
LL 'Y'
iJ e ~ ~y[i~
~ E °
$
I~
~
I
r ~ P*''
'II
9111(illl
i
l
~
~_
I
I a
°
6.
7, illll
~ -V t ~~ a
"r=
1
it °
.
;
..
~
J
~1
{
1 II
!.~I
I ~~ _
ffA
1 ~
_
__
_
~ L
~ .
.e l
_ ~
1
_
._
_._ __ xr
~ _______
3nN3M1P~1_3NJHJJB + ~~
. _.. _..-
--
-
f,
I
~
_ i1I
- I
I ^ rP ~
II it
~' ~ _
3'
~
P; 8
5--- '-
nv z~ls3n5roo
'~'
~'
m
I"°
~~ I i m
m ~ I
I
P109
~vuiRlT 11
`P110`
~g "s9~d ~
~9 ~~ 5
~~ ~ ~g ~ [
:~
33 ~
2i m'
j$
GH ~~
y~
i
J
O Q
~
O
H
a
w
U
Z
O
U
~ ^~
~ as
5 ~¢
P
3
3~
~~
°~ a~
3 ~
z
0
A~
a a
x
Z-
0
~ is
A'
B
9
i
EXHIBIT E
P111
e
v5
~9~6
~'Z
w ~
NxIIID 3E 3x111plvn z
g w
_
I
~
Si E
9 y ~
)
V
'' 8
I 4 a
I
i~i I ~,
~g e
~ ~
~ i
v
!E ~I
4
~ e
~ ~ ~ ~
-
~_
~ a
~
5
y
9
~ 9i ~
9i
4
~
~ ~
i d
Y
~qu
° Q4 5 d
t
A°
~
Q
P6 96 U
O
i i U
y
p
i 1
i
v
v O
7 7 yi yyE ' ~ @v @
E
yiF ~ {
i ~
-- v
y __
ii
~ a ~
~'
~ ,
3 ~e ~e
i Y
i g
i~ -~3nV191S35~W-- P;p3~~
`
/ i
y@a~e
I ~ q
g
99t~ys$
a ~''~°
~ {{
e
l
~
as
.a
~E
i ~ -
E
NOAV 3E 3x11 fO1Yn e
a e
~~€
I m.
// I
_-./
SECTION D-D
~//( / ' -
_ `.r~.me~~nae
SECTION E-E
i T
-~ - -
-
I - -- --
~-
- -
~ I
- -- - -
_ -
-- --
,..
--
--
r- - L
SEOI~CN CL
I I
I
~~d. __
_.-.I
I I
I ~ -
~u_ ~ _ .I __ _ _ _
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~~~
~~ ~~ uiwim~ AE
FWTCHESTER
SECTIONS AND WALL PROFILE
N
WALL A-A PROFILE
„ \ ~
~ ~ J ^\ 'I~
~" '~ i
NI ~.
J I ~ .
i
- - __ -- : ~ ~1~
i ff
1~i
r ..
~~l
r
i
C ~i
__ ~ I
I ~I
•-m
~---_ _ __:e- i
/~ nu
~/
1 ~~~~
~1! --_ _
-tea.
__ ____
NAP.
MkD 14836163 PMCEL 2
tE LAYOUT BY OTHERS\. C
~-~~~`~
N
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~~m
n yHlglllly ~~
-E~,~.
EMtxWVNN:
LDL/.LCUi 1131YM0!
iOiNL FlLL H.WYYIAD!
NEi FlLL ]HlIYYNS
Y •[CA0.ll MEf1PFE!
iPOY VIRgUA MROEN &IAIFf! VMN AIDER.
FCOTCHESTER .¢Lff
CUT AND FILL MAP q
rvo
wr
n
.~. ~e ~~.~__ ~s
_
~~.~
m-` M-" ~
° --_ tip,
'"~~
~ .®,., e,~„~~,~„3
a.m aauvs'e arced tae ae ;g ~ N
' vuve'uVwS'WNLZ Orv3~~1616ML ' 4 i 6
~ irm QWEIMIYItll831 J1IV18L~lYY1 ~ ~ Q
- NYId uooti lB~lm , V e
"o
®®~w ~,y L~® rr s..m 43
{e
a:g 8~i~
~~
~ ~ `~ ,BFI ~ N
_
_
eL Q
~I isY9 6 1
~y: (3 x Q f[
G4 ~i ~
q I uy ~ °:
I -° DN
fy
' c'
~ - ~' ~ ~ ~i ~y ' H ~I T I 0
yy
a. yo-.' a. '>_~
°
~
2
,
~
~
3_M~.. _ _ _ __
.e - _ _ _ _
_
~ _~!sii~6!iilif~ ~3 ~
1 ~
~ ~
~ ~~' ~
~I
~
~~ ,
~ E-~
LLL _-___..__
-
i ____- ~,
1 i Iii
!l~~I!~Il
-- -. is Eti; li II l i
i ¢NVi
!i.•~~
~3? --~;~i 1 f; -, ~
o ~ Al
~
`ll i
I
~
1
°C ~
I ______
L
~1j
I
i ~ i3ll i! I !h
~ il61~ i I ~
~ ~ ~I
I I {{~
1~
~
~
i{
~.' P 1~ liii~
I
__- {
I
I ~
W W
-
-
~
Ci.
~ c~~s
--~ ~ ~ -----i
- -
~ n
_~
1
i o ,~
1
i s
s
_. ~ i
o_
.. o-. .. .. o. d, i ...... o. i
i
-
--
°'
_ _
Q ~ ~ 9
V _ - __ _-
i
~ ~ .. .
l
~
~
II p ~ ~.
1
oL
II ~ e.
~ ~eb p i ~
_
i E
as pe
(p"(pv{5 - 4A6p ~
P ~a p~
S~
y''
`~
~' V~ ( a
... i ~ 0 'n ~ ~ ~.
.- i
ID
~
~
~~ o
t•
i 6f
~ ~~~
i ~~~
i
.
[a
=i
~
~
~
~
w
~
~
a
0
,~ °~n
as ...~
_4 ,,..~ _! ___ - _
i
~ '8
i ~°
,
~~
I
t
I
Sa
JI
~
~
i > .. ~ d., aa ~ ~
' (
LL
W
O
~ ~
j
O
Q
U
P114
EXHIBIT F
P115
~i ~
Qn T
(5
P r
~
< z m
r~ fl i :~
4 E rr __~°
4 ~ E
i ~
9 ~
~: 1
~ ! i B
Z 9~
s i
~
Ft ~
` N =s a c
i B I
° 3s `
~J P ~ ' J ~
e
n a :^~: gib '
'
~
~~ a a %~ E6 @a
:
~
'~~
~
~
~ '.: Ni hNN
a J ~~r9~
~
~
?
~
' ~
,' g ~E ~,mH~
y J
~. ~-
,
~x- .
a ii
~ v
_r °~ ~ 8
~
j~ o
3.
~ °- ~ ~
.~ i3,~ c ~~ 9
~ 3^ 3 . ~ ~ ~
~
~
~§
~ E
I
n i/ ~ t E ! ~ C
i'~'
.. ,,~ -
- -.
-- ~ ~
.-.~ - -
- -
l - _~
~
9 4
$
a a
m
F E
~
~
qq
{
Re~^ A
D
y ate; .
$e~i c
u~~~ G
Y^ n
Y
p
_ ~~ ~ ~ ~,
a n A i2. _
~! FLOOX PIANfI ~ wmam Nm~
D i II-8f011V OFFIce WLLUIq __ _ men ~.
~__ ~__ -e_
e _
a e
P116
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
7:05 p.m. Doug Fenn December 19, 2006
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2005-01084 -
CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES -The development of a master plan for an office and
commercial center consisting of one bank with drive-thru at 4,500 square feet (Building A); one
drive-thru restaurant at 2,430 square feet (Building B); two restaurant buildings totaling
13,000 square feet (Buildings C and E); one retail, multi-tenant/restaurant building at
5,100 square feet (Building D); and atwo-story 39,400 square foot medical office (Building F) on
12.66 net acres of land in the designated as General Commercial and within the District of
Industrial Park (Subarea 7), located at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester
Avenue - APN: 0229-021-31 and 32. Related Files: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17594,
Development District Amendment DRC2005-01008. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative
Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration.
Background: This project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee on November 14, 2006,
(see attached). The Committee requested the applicant to revise the plans, and to bring the project
back to the Committee. The applicant has revised the plans for Committee review.
REVISED PLANS WILL BE AVAILABLE AT THE MEETING.
Design Review Committee Action:
Members Present: McPhail, Stewart, Diaz
Staff Planner: Doug Fenn
The Committee approved the project as presented.
P117
DESIGN REVIEW'COMMENTS
8:00 p.m. Doug Fenn November 14, 2006
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17818 -
CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to subdivide 12.66 net acres of land into
6 parcels for commercial and professional office purposes designated as General Commercial
and within the District of Industrial Park (Subarea 7), located at the southeast corner of
Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue -APN: 0229-021-31 and 32. Related Files:
Conditional Use Permit DRC2005-0001084 and Development District Amendment
DRC2005-01008. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental
impacts for consideration.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2005-01084 -
CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES -The development of a master plan for an office and
commercial center consisting of one bank with drive-thru at 4,500 square feet (Building A), one
drive-thru restaurant at 2,430 square feet (Building B), two restaurant buildings totaling
13,000 square feet (Buildings C and E), one retail multi-tenanUrestaurant building at
5,100 square feet (Building D), and atwo-story 39,400 square foot medical office (Building F) on
12.66 net acres of land in the designated as General Commercial and within the District of
Industrial Park (Subarea 7), located at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and
Rochester Avenue -APN: 0229-021-31 and 32. Related Files: Tentative Parcel Map
SUBTPM17818 and Development District Amendment DRC2005-01008. Staff has prepared a
Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration.
Site Parameters: The site is rectangular in shape and is comprised of two parcels. It is vacant
with sparse vegetation and weeds covering the majority of the site and has evidence of discing
for weed abatement purposes. To the north of Foothill Boulevard is the recently approved
commercial center DRC2005-00365; to the east is an Edison Power Line Corridor; to the south
is vacant land with a professional office project that will be reviewed for entitlement by the
Planning Commission on December 13, 2006. To the west/north are the Aggauotti home,
formerly a winery and designated Historic Point of Interest (not a part of project), and the
Masi Plaza commercial center across the street of Rochester Avenue.
Desian Parameters
The proposed master plan project, with its mix of office, retail, and restaurants, will have a
synergy consistent with the commercial/office corridor of Foothill Boulevard. The five retail/
restaurant and bank buildings front along Foothill Boulevard. The two-story office building faces
Rochester Avenue. There is one main entrance off of Rochester Avenue for the professional
office building (Building F), and two ingress/egress accesses are provided off of
Foothill Boulevard; first one just east of the Aggazzotti residence and the other at the eastern
property line. The eastern Foothill Boulevard access will line up with the new signalized median
break that was recently approved for the northerly commercial project DRC2005-00365. There
is a plaza area between Buildings C, D and E that is visible from Foothill Boulevard.
The property is designated as a "Suburban Parkway Enhancement Area" by the Route 66
Visual Improvement Plan. The proposed Landscape Plan reflects these required elements,
including special parkway and street pavement treatments.
P118
DRC ACTION AGENDA
SUBTPM17818 AND DRC2005-01084
November 14, 2006
Page 2
The applicant has also included two decorative pilasters that are visible from Foothill Boulevard
and two decorative Route 66 monument pedestrian gateway structures on the north and the
side of the multi-retail and restaurant Building (D). Building D is also flanked by an abundant
amount of Date Palm trees, many are aesthetically designed in front of the building.
The multi-retail and restaurant Building D is the only building that was submitted with an
elevation plan and will be the architectural standard by which all the other commercial buildings
will have to comply with. The exterior building skin of the commercial buildings will contain
Dalitle Grigio ceramic wall tiles, clear anodized aluminum window frames, Grey tint Pilkington
storefront glazing, Vintage wood Madera concrete the roofing, and Tumbleweed Ledge stone
veneer (which has been changed to a rounded smooth veneer - a sample will be available at the
Design Review Committee meeting). The two-story office building is a rectangular shaped
building with subtle recessed arch elements at the base and protruding vertical metallic
rectangle shaped columns that exceed the height of the primary roof line on the east and west
sides of the building. Metal silver colored, trellis-like sun shade canopies are over the entry
ways. There is also interplay of a concrete arch that is designed with reveal cuts on the north
and south side of the building. Materials of the building are blue/green tinted reflective glass,
clear anodized aluminum mullions, Pietra Di Luserna ceramic tiles, and a complimentary color
schedule of grey, desert and off-white paint finish.
Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee
discussion.
Map and Design Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee
discussion regarding this project. As noted above, the project site is located along
Foothill Boulevard, the City's primary commercial corridor. The building architecture, site
planning, and landscaping must be of the highest quality and sophistication. To meet this goal,
staff recommends the following enhancements:
Map
The proposed tentative parcel map appears to be the old version as opposed to the
revised version that reflects the required on-site parking spaces. Additionally, this map
does not depict the correct building pads. Please revise or clarify how you intend to
subdivide the project.
Design
Access/Site Plan - A driveway is proposed adjoining the existing Aggazotti residence and
could create noise, light and glare problems. For eastbound traffic on Foothill Boulevard,
this will be the first driveway into the project. Will the 10-foot wide planter and the existing
fence provide adequate buffering between two very different intensities of land use?
2. Parking/Site Plan -Since the project was deemed complete, the applicant has made some
changes that now must be analyzed for Code compliance. There appears to be some minor
inconsistencies of the modified Uniform Application, Site Plan, and other related plans.
Below is a table that depicts what is required and what was proposed.
The data on the following table assumes that the property lines shown on the Site Plan are
correct as opposed to the proposed property lines of the submitted Tentative Parcel Map.
P119
DRC ACTION AGENDA
SUBTPM17818 AND DRC2005-01084
November 14, 2006
Page 3
Type of Bldg. Use Required Parking Provided Parking Inconsistent or
and Square footage Amount deficient Required
Parkin
Bldg. A Bank with drive-thru 18 parking spaces @ 18 parking spaces None
4,500 s uare feet 1/250
Bldg. B Drive-thru
Restaurant 2,430
square feet. 32 spaces @ 1/75 25 parking spaces Deficient 7 parking
' However, the Sile Plan SpaCOS
tle icts 2.400 s uare feet
Bldg. C Restaurant 6,D00 60 spaces @ 1/100 61 parking spaces -None
s uare feet
Bldg. D Multi-tenant Unknown Not Available Not available
Retail/Restaurant The number of parking
5,100 square feet spaces can not be
correctly determined
parking because the
amount of retail vs.
restaurant is not
provided.
Retail would be 1/250
and a non-fast food
restaurant will be 1/100
Bldg. E Restaurant 7,000 60 parking spaces 78 parking spaces None
s uare feet 1/100 and 18 1/55
Bldg. F Medical Office Bldg. 197 parking spaces - 158 parking spaces Deficient 39
39,400 s uare feet Medical office is 1/200 office 1/250 arkin s aces
To make the parking Site Plan to easier to read and understand, please provide a sheet that
depicts a Site Plan with the proposed property lines and parking spaces. Any changes to the
parking layout will affect the parking lot design.
The applicant also proposes a valet parking pick-up and drop-off area that is off-set from the
drive aisle, which could possible impact the required parking. Assuming that valet service will
be in the evening hours, the applicant will need to identify where such valet parking will be
located, and will it be separated and cordon off from the rest of the parking lot. Additionally, the
applicant shows outdoor patio dining areas. These outdoor dining areas must also be included
in the tabulation of required parking spaces.
Staff recommends that an on-site parking analysis be provide to clarify the above reference
parking issues shortfall. The applicant also depicts community seating on the south side of the
multi-tenant retail Building D. If these outdoor seating areas are part of the plaza area and not
intended as out dining areas, then they should be dispersed and clustered throughout the plaza
around the landscape planters to help strengthen the plaza area ambiance.
P120
DRC ACTION AGENDA
SUBTPM17818 AND DRC2005-01084
November 14, 2006
Page 4
3. Architecture
a. Retail Buildings: The multi-retail and restaurant Building (D) is the only building
submitted with elevations. The applicant will submit elevations of the other buildings
once a tenant has signed a contract, and a development review proposal will be
processed for approval. Staff has informed the applicant that the first approved retail
building will set the standard and design criteria for the other buildings. All of the
buildings must be designed to reflect a fluid architectural theme that appears as if all
of the buildings were entitled at the same time with the same architectural design.
Staff does like the rounded tower element that is designed at the center of the
Building D; however, the rest of the building reflects an overall design that is "typical"
of an uncreative in-line retail center.
b. Medical Office Building: The multi-story medical office Building F is an architectural
style (two options are presented) that is not reflective of retail Building D design but
has a similar color palette to match the retail colors. This will make the two different
uses appear uniform.
Staff recommends the following to give the office building a finished professional
look:
Except for the vertical metallic elements, a cornice should be added on the
primary and secondary rooflines.
On the east and west side of the building, the top roofline screen element shall
extend out to the next reveal joint point.
Increase the height of the glass on the second story (may be spandrel glass)
on all sides of the building.
On the north and west sides of the building, cover the entire arch type element
with the Pietera Di Luserna ceramic tile. It may be a good idea to make the
color of the file a bit darker, to be in concrete with the darker stone material on
the retail buildings.
4. Landscaping
a. Provide a more creative landscape palette
b. Route 66 Suburban Parkway Enhancement Area -Provide the required elements per
the Visual Improvement Plan (see Attachment A): 1) Repave the street with "Street
Print" accent paving material and a Route 66 logo imprinted into the pavement
surface; 2) Install post and cable barrier behind the curb; 3) Add special artwork/icon
both in the parkway and median; and 4) Add mosaic murals or state decal file-work
inlays. Revise the sidewalk design to match the Visual Improvement Plan standards.
P121
DRC ACTION AGENDA
SUBTPM17818 AND DRC2005-01084
November 14, 2006
Page 5
5. Lighting Plan
a. Revise the proposed light fixtures to include proper shielding to prevent spillage and
glare onto the adjoining Aggazzotti residence.
6. Miscellaneous Items
a. The trash enclosures must be decorative to match the architecture of the project and
delete the split face block.
b. The pedestrian pathways shall have illuminated bollards to help strengthen the
pathways at night time for aesthetic and safety purposes.
c. Provide trellis over the pedestrian pathways flanked (where possible) with landscape
planters.
d. Extend the decorative paving along the entire distance of the flanking landscape
planters and terminate at the crossing drive aisle.
e. The oval shaped planter in front of the medical office building should include a
decorative pilaster as provided along Foothill Boulevard.
f. The decorative pilasters on Foothill Boulevard should be located as to not be blocked
by the proposed Date Palm trees.
g. Two additional pilasters should be located on the south side of the plaza area in front
of Building D and shall align with the two north facing pilasters.
Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be
incorporated into the project design without discussion.
1. The project will require review and approval of a Uniform Sign Program.
2. All outdoor furniture (tables, benches, trash receptacles, bollards, bus shelter etc.) shall be
uniform and reflection of the Route 66 theme (see Attachment B).
Housekeeping Item
Provide full size color elevations and Landscape Plans.
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee direct the applicant to go back
and work with staff to address inconsistencies and revise the project as listed in the Design
Review staff report and bring the project back to the Committee for Design Review.
Design Review Committee Action:
Members Present: Stewart, McPhail, Coleman
Staff Planner: Doug Fenn
P122
DRC ACTION AGENDA
SUBTPM17818 AND DRC2005-01084
November 14, 2006
Page 6
Staff gave a brief overview of the project to the Committee members. Staff informed the
Committee that the project (especially the retail portion) needs to be revised and reviewed by
staff.
The applicant came prepared a written response to the Design Review Committee Staff Report.
The applicant gave a presentation regarding some changes they made to the Site and
Landscape Plans and an overall history of the development of the elevation submittal.
However, no new changes were made to the elevations that were recommended by staff in the
Design Review Staff Report.
The Committee did agree that the professional office building did need a cornice, and that the
color of the stone material was appropriate and the elevation screen like element could be
reduced in size.
The Committee recommended that the remaining outstanding items such as parking and the
retail building redesign be worked out with staff and that the project should come back as a
Consent Item once all issues have been addressed.
P123
ENVIRONMENTAL
INFORMATION FORM
City of Rancho Cucamonga (Part I -Initial Study)
Planning Division
(909) 4772750
The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed
project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City policies, ordinances, and
guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City=s Rules and Procedures
to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this application be
provided in full.
information.
Application Number for the project to which this form
pertains:
'lease note that it is the responsibility ofthe applicant to ensure that
will not be available to perform work required to provide missing
Project Footchester
Title:
Name 6 Address of project
owner(s):
City of Ontario Civic Center, 303 East "B" Street, Ontario, CA 91764
Name & Address of developer or project
sponsor.' Charles Joseph Associates, Chuck Buquet
10681 Foothill Blvd #395 Rancho Cucamonga, ca 91730
Contact Person & Charles Joseph Associates, Chuck Buquet
Address:
10681 Foothill Blvd. Suite 395, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Telephone (909) 481-1822
Number.'
Name & Address of person preparing this form (i(different from above): As shown above.
EXHIBIT C
- 4/96 Page 1
P124
Information indicated by astertsk () is not required ofnon-construction CUP=s unless otherwise requested by staff.
1) Provide a lull scale (8-1/2 x 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the project site, and indicate the site
boundaries.
2) Provide a set of color photographs, which show representative views into the site from the north, south, east and west;
views into and from the site from the phmary access points, which serve the site; and representative views of signi(cant
features from the $ite. Include a map showing location of each photograph.
3) Project Location (describe): South East Comer of Foothill Blvd, and Rochester
4) Assessor=s Parcel Numbers (attach additional sheet if
necessary):
0229-021-31 and 0229-021-32
5) Gross Site Area (ac/sq.
ft.):
14.66
6) Net Site Area (total site size minus area of public streets & proposed dedications):
12.66
7)Descnbe any proposed general plan amendment orzone change which would affect the project site (attach additional sheet if
necessary:
None.
B)Include a description of all permits which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental
agencies in order to fully implement the project:
Building Permits
FOOTCHESTER CUP INITIAL STUDY - 4/96 Page 2
P125
9)Describe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the project including information on topography, soil stability, plants
and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on site
(including age and condition) and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of significant features descdbed. In addition,
site all sources of information (i.e., geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and archeological surveys, traffic studies):
Site is currently a vacant parcel with no landscaping, existing street improvements and street lights along
Foothill and Rochester. To the north west is an existing non-conforming residential house at the corner known
as
The Di Carlo home, with the Masi Plaza across the street to the west of the home. To the south of the site is
vacant land to be developed by City of Ontario and the Quakes Stadium parking lot., and power station.
Edison Power transmission lines to the east with an existing free farm.
1 o)Describe the known cultural and/orhistoncal aspects of the site. Site all sources of information (books, published reports and
oral history):
Site historically had a viticultural use. Site has been subject to annual weed abatement and soils discing for past 20+
years.
11)Deschbe any noise sources and their levels that now affect the site (aircraft, roadway noise, etc.) and how they will affect
proposed uses:
General noise sources from Foothill Blvd traffic and Rochester traffc. Future site development will identify and mitigate
Noise impacts in conformance with City noise standards as a component of a City Development review and approval
Process.
FOOTCHESTER CUP INITIAL STUDY - 4/96 Page 3
P126
12)Descdbe the proposed project in detail. This should provide an adequate description of the site in terms of ultimate use which
will result from the posed project. Indicate if there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur
with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment. Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary:
The project has been designed to continue the Industrial Office park feel existing along the east side of
Rochester from Arrow to Foothill. The large office tenant is very excited about this project and will consist of a
39,600 square feet office park.
This design concept is develop a center that will utilize the already allowable office, fast food, bank and
restaurant uses to enhance the uses allowed under the current zoning.
There will be bank 4,500, 2 story of(ce 39,600, Fast Food 3,500 square feet 5,500 square feet multi tenant food
users, 2 sit down restaurants of 6,550 square feet 6,000 square feet
13)Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, orscenic aspects.
Indicate the type o/ land use (residential, commeroial, etc.), intensify o/land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops,
department stores, etc.) and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc.):
South -Existing parking lot for quakes stadium and existing industrial park.
East -Immediately adjacent is the Edison Power transmission lines with landscape company operations.
Beyond being a Sears Shopping center.
North -Approximately 9 undeveloped acres, Currently in process for aHotel/Retail development, which is just
south of existing residential.
West- Masi Plaza Shopping Center
14)Will the proposed project change the pattern, scale or character o/the surrounding general aroa of the project?
This will continue the existing and newly constructed retail corridor along Foothill and Industrial office park concept along
Rochester.
15)Indicate the type ofshort-term and long-term noise to be generated, including source and amount. How will these noise levels
affect adjacent properties and on-site uses. What methods of soundproofing are proposed?
Proposed development will be conditioned to comply with all applicable noise standards and sound attenuation
requirements.
16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements o(mature orscenic trees:
FOOTCHESTER CUP INITIAL STUDY - 4/96 Page 4
P127
There are no trees currently on the site.
17) Indicate any bodies of water (including domestic water supplies) info which the site drains:
N/A
18)Indicate expected amount of waterusage. (See Attachment A for usage estimates). Forfurfhercladfication, please contact
the Cucamonga County Water District at 987-2591.
a. Residential (gal/day)
b. Commercial/Ind. (gal/day/ac) 1.500
Peak use (gal/Day)
Peak use (gal/min/ac) 1500/18 990
19)Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal. Septic Tank_XX Sewer. If septic tanks are proposed, attach
percolation tests. If discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation: (See
AttachmentAforusageestimales). For furtherc/arification,pleasecontacttheCucamongaCountyWaterDistrictat987-2591.
a. Residential (gal/day)
b. Commercial/Ind. (gal/day/ac)
RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS:
20) Number ofresidential units:
Detached (indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size: N/A
Attached (indicate whether units are rental or for sale units): N/A
21)Anticipated range of sale prices and/or rents:
Sale Pdce(s) $ n/a to $
Rent (per month) $ to $
22) Specify number of bedrooms by unit type: N/A
FOOTCHESTER CUP INITIAL STUDY - 4/96 Page 5
P128
23) Indicate anticipated household size by unit
type:
N/A
N/A
24)Indicate the expected number of school children who will be residing within the project: Contact the appropriate School
Disthcts as shown in Attachment B:
a. Elementary: 0
b. Junior High: _0
c. Senior High 0
COMMERCIAL. INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS
25) Describe type of use(s) and major function(s) o/commercial, industrial or institutional
uses:
The proposed median break would help with the current congestion at Foothill and Rochester and will be
consistent with access on Masi Drive. This median break will allow for travelers of the hotel have more efficient
access to the interstate 15 freeway.
26) Total floor area o/commercial, industhal, or institutional uses by
type:
Bank 4,500, 2 story ofFce 39,600, Restaurant 21,050
27) Indicate hours of operation: To be determined. Office hours primarily during the day Restaurant during the evenings
TotaC To be determined
Number of
employees:
28)
Maximum Shift: To be determined
Time of Maximum Shifl: 8 hours
29)Provide breakdown of anticipated job classifications, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an indication of the rate of
hire for each classification (attach additional sheet if necessary):
To be determined
FOOTCHESTER CUP INITIAL STUDY - 4/96 Page 6
P129
30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside in the
City:
Unknown at this time, to be determined.
31)For commercial and industhal uses only, indicate the source, type and amount of air pollution emissions. (Data should be
verified through the South Coast Air Quality Management District, at (818) 572-6283):
Future site development will comply with all applicable AQMD Standards and Requirements.
ALL PROJECTS
32)Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies serving the project been contacted to determine their ability to provide
adequate service to the proposed project? If so, please indicate their response.
All agencies contacted have indicated their ability to provide services.
FOOTCHESTER CUP INITIAL STUDY - 4/96 Page 7
P130
33)In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials?
Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include, but are not limited to PCB=s; radioactive substances; pesticides and
herbicides; /ue/s, oils, solvents, and other flammable liquids and gases. Also note underground storage of any of the above.
Please list the matenals and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates o(use, it
known.
No
34)Wil/ the proposed project involve the temporary or long-term use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic
matenals, including but not limited to those examples listed above? If yes, provide an inventory of all such materials to be
used and proposed method of disposal. The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be
shown and labeled on the application plans.
No
I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and infomration required for
adequate evaluation of this project to the best o/ my ability, that the facts, statements, and information presented are tme and
correct tot he best of my knowledge and belief. 1 further understand that additional infomration maybe required to be submitted
before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
Date: Auoust 8, 2006 Signature:
Title: Chuck Buouel President
FOOTCHESTER CUP INITIAL STUDY - 4/96 Page 8
CUASTI QUADFP~3~L
' G.4 LIFORNIA
?.5 MINUTE SE(21ES lTOPOGR
5 se,. onuaw •a ounbunwc~e
.~~~ • • I -SJ/TNEh"N l~ T- PAC`` SECT
_ _~ ~~ ~.
~ Vii.
i`.~~~- "' i - it ,/,~ nI ~~ }/ ,
~, ~ ~ ~-
~~ !
u I ; '// a' /. ~.
` /,
~ ~ /
s -.~- _ a 5
~ _ /
_ _ ~
9 ~.
L J~',.._
. Project Site r i'`~-~-//7~/ 1~ - _ o E I~' l
_ Y~ 1•I ,
v /_/ u
~.~. rr •,. w ~~ /
_._ _ _ _ -
1 ~~~ 1!S ci~ 9 /I I]le f
v?_ - I
s r FTC - `_
_ If hebLe ~ry I j1/ __ r r_nf n `•vY•~ ~NT I ~ F ~ ~ ~~~~
• • :: i 1 ~ , ~~_
qI f.,~ '. / , ,VI
_ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ it-~ O ~ ~.-EEL r v a
-~_ ~ ~ 6 _ ~ ~ i1 I - i f~ ~-bT r~_
3.:~~'~'
' _ 11
~t6 i r/ci T .an ~ ~ 4
p 'I~ ~7 F
1 v,.nll.nrr i. l_ i~\I'~f Ifl ,.~1u ..~~I~s~ ~y-F, Iv /y•t _r_--~ ~~=
IIpY JA bf _ "~p~
@@ Y
,I Ij .' ._ i II .•. I Ili snv IIF
a I ~
L' 11 _ 1 I z~i~ .~ b
S,nN QLPNARO//Vtl :\~ ~ /FPFEWaYt _,_ ~ ~~_
~ ~.. ~~
Ij '-( ~ 50'1,TNE ~ 9 ~
-~ I 1 5 V ER ~~~ L ~
ti~I ~ ~ I O 1 • IL f.
~[ III 1
~oYli ^• 9oG
P132
BACKGROUND
City of Rancho Cucamonga
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
INITIAL STUDY PART II
Project File: Development District Amendment 2005-01008, Tentative Parcel Map
SUBTPM17818, and Development Review DRC2005-01084
Related Files: None
3. Description of Project:
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT
DRC2005-01008 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to change the Development
District from Industrial Park (Subarea 7) to General Commercial (to reflect the current General Plan
Designation of General Commercial), located at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and
Rochester Avenue -APN: 0229-021-31 and 32.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17818 -CHARLES
JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to subdivide 12.66 net acres of land into 6 parcels for
commercial and professional office purposes designated as General Commercial and within the
District of Industrial Park (Subarea 7), located at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and
Rochester Avenue -APN: 0229-021-31 and 32.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2005-01084 -
CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES -The development of a master plan for an office and
commercial center consisting of one bank with drive-thru at 4,500 square feet (Building A), one
drive-thru restaurant at 2,430 square feet (Building B), two restaurant buildings totaling
13,000 square feet (Buildings C and E), one retail multi-tenanUrestaurant building at 5,100 square
feet (Building D), and atwo-story 39,400 square foot medical office (Building F) on 12.66 net acres
of land designated as General Commercial and within the District of Industrial Park (Subarea 7),
located at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue -APN: 0229-021-31
and 32.
4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address:
Charles Joseph Associates
10681 Foothill Boulevard, Suite 395
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
5. General Plan Designation: General Commercial
6. Zoning: Industrial Park (Subarea 7)
7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The site is rectangular in shape and is comprised of two
parcels. It is vacant with sparse vegetation and weeds covering the majority of the site and has
evidence of discing for weed abatement purposes. To the north of Foothill Boulevard is the
recently approved commercial center DRC2005-00365; to the east is an Edison Power Line
Corridor; to the south is vacant land with a professional office project that will be reviewed for
entitlement by the Planning Commission on December 13, 2006. The project surrounds the parcel
at the intersection that contains the Aggazzotti home, formerly a winery and designated Historic
Point of Interest (not a part of project). To the west is the Masi Plaza commercial center across the
street of Rochester Avenue.
P133
Initial Study for
DRC2005-01008, SUBTT17818 and DRC2005-01084
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 2
8. Lead Agency Name and Address:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Department
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
9. Contact Person and Phone Number:
Douglas Fenn, Associate Planner
(909) 477-2750
10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or
participation agreement): None
GLOSSARY -The following abbreviations are used in this report:
EIR -Environmental Impact Report
FEIR -Final Environmental Impact Report
NOx -Nitrogen Oxides
ROG -Reactive Organic Gases
PM~o -Fine Particulate Matter
RWOCB -Regional Water Quality Control Board
SCAQMD -South Coast Air Quality Management District
URBEMIS7G -Urban Emissions Model
P134
Initial Study for
DRC2005-01008, SUBTT17818 and DRC2005-01084
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 3
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below
would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant
Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact"
as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
(/) Aesthetics ( )Agricultural Resources (/) Air Quality
(/) Biological Resources (/) Cultural Resources (/) Geology/Soils
( )Hazards & Hazardous Materials (/) Hydrology/Water Quality ( )Land Use/Planning
( )Mineral Resources ( ) Energy and Mineral Resources ( )Population/Housing
( )Public Services (/) Noise ( ) Transportation/Traffic
( )Utilities/Service Systems ( ) Recreation
(/) Mandatory Findings of Significance
DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
() I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment. A
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
(/) 1 find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,
there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been
made by, or agreed to, by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
will be prepared.
() I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
() I find that the proposed project MAY have a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially
Significant Unless Mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been
adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standard and 2) has been
addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets.
An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that
remain to be addressed.
() I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,
because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or
NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or
mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or
mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required.
Prepared
Reviewed
By Date: ~/ ~]!~~
i ,// ~/ /'
Date: ~ ~ ~/' U ~f0
P135
Initial Study for
DDA2005-01007, SUBTT17818 and DRC2005-01084
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 4
Less Than
Significant Less
Issues and Su ortm Information Sources:
pp g Fota^tiany
Significant With
Mitlgauon Than
signamam
No
Impact Incomoratetl Impact Impact
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
1. AESTHETICS. Would the project:
a) Have a substantial affect a scenic vista? () () () (/)
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not () () () (/)
limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings
within a State Scenic Highway?
c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or () () () (/)
quality of the site and its surroundings?
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which () () (/) ( )
would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the
area?
Comments:
a) There are no significant vistas within or adjacent to the project site. The site is not within a view
corridor according to General Plan Exhibit III-15.
b) The project site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic
Highway. There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
c) The site is rectangular in shape and is comprised of two parcels. It is vacant with sparse vegetation
and weeds covering the majority of the site and has evidence of discing for weed abatement
purposes. To the north of Foothill Boulevard is the recently approved commercial center
Conditional Use Permit DRC2005-00365; to the east is an Edison Power Line Corridor; to the south
is vacant land with a professional office project that will be reviewed for entitlement by the Planning
Commission on December 13, 2006; and to the wesVnorth are the Aggazzotti home, formerly a
winery and designated Historic Point of Interest (not a part of project), and the Masi Plaza
commercial center across the street of Rochester Avenue. The proposed project should not create
any conflicts with the existing land uses in the area and should remain consistent with the General
Plan land use designation for the site. The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of
.this project. Design review is required prior to approval. City standards require the developer to
underground existing and new utility lines less than 66Kv and facilities to minimize unsightly
appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission
Resolution No. 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution.
d) The project will create new light and glare because the site is currently vacant. The design and
placement of light fixtures will be shown on site plans which require review for consistency with City
standards that require shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare. Lighting will be
selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the project site. The impact is not
considered significant.
P136
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DDA2005-01007, SUBTT17818 and DRC2005-01084 Page 5
Less Than
Significant less
Issues and Su ortin Information Sources:
pP g Ppfenfiany
Significant w""
Mlfigation Than
Significant
No
Impact Incorporated Irtpact Impact
2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland () () (/) ( )
of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the
maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and
Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency,
to non-agricultural use?
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a () () () (/)
Williamson Act contract?
c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, () () () (/)
due to their location or nature, could result in conversion
of Farmland, to non-agricultural use?
Comments:
a) The site is designated as Farmland of Statewide Importance. The site is rectangular in shape and
is comprised of two parcels. It is vacant with sparse vegetation and weeds covering the majority of
the site and has evidence of discing for weed abatement purposes. To the north of Foothill
Boulevard is the recently approved commercial center Conditional Use Permit DRC2005-00365; to
the east is an Edison Power Line Corridor; to the south is vacant land with a professional office
project that will be reviewed for entitlement by the Planning Commission on December 13, 2006;
and, to the wesUnorth are the Aggazzotti home, formerly a winery and designated Historic Point of
Interest (not a part of project), and the Masi Plaza commercial center across the street of Rochester
Avenue. The proposed project should not create any conflicts with the existing land uses in the
area and should remain consistent with the General Plan land use designation for the site.' There
are approximately 1,300 acres of Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide
Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, of which about one-third is either developed or
committed to development according to General Plan Table IV-2. The major concentrations of
designated farmlands are located in the southern and eastern portions of the City that is
characterized by existing and planned development. Further, two-thirds of the designated
farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is
doubtful; therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use
Plan. The General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report identified the conversion of farmlands
to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a statement of overriding
conditions was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the
General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated.
b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. There are no
Williamson Act contracts within the City.
c) The site is rectangular in shape and is comprised of two parcels. It is vacant with sparse vegetation
and weeds covering the majority of the site and has evidence of discing for weed abatement
purposes. To the north of Foothill Boulevard is the recently approved commercial center
Conditional Use Permit DRC2005-00365; to the east is an Edison Power Line Corridor; to the south
is vacant land with a professional office project that will be reviewed for entitlement by the Planning
Commission on December 13, 2006; and to the wesUnorth are the Aggazzotti home, formerly a
winery and designated Historic Point of Interest (not a part of project), and the Masi Plaza
commercial center across the street of Rochester Avenue. No adverse impacts are anticipated.
P137
Initial Study for
DDA2005-01007, SUBTT17818 and DRC2005-01084
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 6
Less Than
Sipnilicam Less
Issues and Su ortin Information Sources:
PP g Fp~en~ially
Significant wim
Mitigation Than
Significant
No
Impact Incor oraietl Impact Impact
3. AIR DUALITY. Would the project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable () () () (/)
air quality plan?
b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially () (/) () ( )
to an existing or projected air quality violation?
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any () () () (/)
criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-
attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient
air quality standard (including releasing emissions which
exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors?
d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant () (/) () ( )
concentrations?
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial () () () (/)
number of people?
Comments:
a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 6.6), continued development will contribute to the
pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State
standards. The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant
unavoidable adverse impact for which a statement of overriding conditions was ultimately adopted
by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR
was prepared and impacts evaluated.
b) During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction
vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions. In addition, fugitive
dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities. While most of the dust
would settle on or near the project site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere,
increasing particle levels within the surrounding area. Construction is an on-going industry in the
Rancho Cucamonga area. Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one
development site until their tasks are complete. They then transfer to a different site where the
process begins again. Therefore, the emissions associated with construction activities are not new
to the Rancho Cucamonga area and would not violate an air quality standard or worsen the. existing
air quality in the region. Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be
assessed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) on aproject-specific
basis. Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to
less-than-significant levels:
1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to
reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction
equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'
specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City
verification.
2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction
plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use.
Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile
construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to
be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction
P138
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DDA2005-01007, SUBTT17818 and DRC2005-01084 Page 7
Lass Than
Slpnilicam Less
Issues and Su ortin Information Sources:
PP g Finantlally
Signilicanf With
Mitigauon Than
Significant
No
mDan nCOrpO/at2tl Impact mpatl
measures imposed by the South Coast Air duality Management District (SCAQMD) as
well as City Planning staff.
3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD
Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume,
low-pressure spray.
4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108.
5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403.
Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions:
• Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and
watering.
• Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads.
• Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over
extended periods of time.
• Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during
and after the end of work periods.
• Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and
use sound engineering practices.
• Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried
over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing
may vary depending upon time of year of construction.
• Suspend grading operations during high. winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding
25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements.
• Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover
payloads using tarps or other suitable means.
6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by
SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Fine
Particulate Matter (PM,g) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403.
7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all
inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,g
emissions.
8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered
equipment where feasible.
9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a
statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use.
After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, short-term construction air quality
emissions would remain significant as noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.6). Based upon
the Urban Emissions Model (URBEMIS7G) model estimates in Table 5.6-4 of the General Plan
FEIR, Nitrogen Oxides (Nox), Reactive Organic Gases (ROG), and Fine Particulate Matter (PM,o)
P139
Initial Study for
DDA2005-01007, SUBTT17818 and DRC2005-01084
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 8
Less Than
Significant Lew
Issues and Su ortin Information Sources:
PP g Po+anually
Significant wim
Mitigation Than
Significant
No
Im act Incoryoraletl Im act Impact
would exceed SCAOMD thresholds for significance; therefore, would all be cumulatively significant
if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant. The General Plan
FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for
which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council.
In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in significant
operational vehicle emissions based upon the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5.6-4 of the
General Plan FEIR; therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a
project basis to a level less-than-significant. The following mitigation measures shall be
implemented:
10) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not
be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes).
11) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for
vanpools.
12) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required
to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas.
13) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required
to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent
reasonably feasible.
After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FEIR identified the
citywide increase in operational emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a
statement of overriding conditions was ultimately adopted by the City Council.
c) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.6), continued development would contribute to the
pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State
standards. The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant
and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by
the City Council. The project proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was
prepared and impacts evaluated.
d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution
than the population at large. The SCAOMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors:
long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes,
residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities. According to the
SCAOMD, projects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile
of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAOMD Rule 1401. The
project site is adjacent to asingle-family home to the north, the historic Aggazotti residence, and is
within .OS mile of the "Rochester" neighborhood of single-family residences. Further, the mitigation
measures listed under b) above would reduce any impacts to a less than significant level.
e) Typically, the uses proposed do not create objectionable odors. No adverse impacts are
anticipated.
P14O
Initial Study for
DDA2005-01007, SUBTT17818 and DRC2005-01084
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 9
Less Than
signillcant Less
Issues and Su ortin Information Sources:
pp 9 Pmentiany
slgnumant w""
Muigau°n rnan
sigwicant
No
Impact Incorporatetl Im°an Impac:
4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or () () () (/)
through habitat modifications, on any species identified
as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in
local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the
California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service?
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat or () () () (/)
other sensitive natural community identified in local or
regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California
Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife
Service?
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected () () () (/)
wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool,
coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological
interruption, or other means?
d) Intertere substantially with the movement of any native () () () (/)
resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with
established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors,
or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting () () () (/)
biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or
ordinance?
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat () () () (/)
Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation
Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat
conservation plan?
Comments:
a) The site is rectangular in shape and is comprised of two parcels. It is vacant with sparse vegetation
and weeds covering the majority of the site and has evidence of discing for weed abatement
purposes. To the north of Foothill Boulevard is the recently approved commercial center
Conditional Use Permit DRC2005-00365; to the east is an Edison Power Line Corridor; to the south
is vacant land with a professional office project that will be reviewed for entitlement by the Planning
Commission on December 13, 2006; and to the wesUnorth are the Aggazzotti home, formerly a
winery and designated Historic Point of Interest (not a part of project), and the Masi Plaza
commercial center across the street of Rochester Avenue. According to the General Plan Exhibit
IV-3, and Section 5.3 of the General Plan FEIR, the project site is within an area of sensitive
biological resources.
b) The site is rectangular in shape and is comprised of two parcels. It is vacant with sparse vegetation
and weeds covering the majority of the site and has evidence of discing for weed abatement
purposes. To the north of Foothill Boulevard is the recently approved commercial center
DRC2005-00365; to the east is an Edison Power Line Corridor; to the south is vacant land with a
professional office project that will be reviewed for entitlement by the Planning Commission on
December 13, 2006; and to the west/north are the Aggazzotti home, formerly a winery and
designated Historic Point of Interest (not a part of project), and the Masi Plaza commercial center
P141
Initial Study for
DDA2005-01007, SUBTT17818 and DRC2005-01084
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 10
Less Than
Sipnilicam Less
Issues and Su ortin Information Sources:
pp g Pp~anrally
Sipniiicant With
Mnipa~mn Tnan
Signillcant
Np
Impact Incorpora~etl Im act Impact
across the street of Rochester Avenue. The project site is located in an urban area with no natural
communities. No riparian habitat exists on-site, meaning the project will not have any impacts.
c) No wetland habitat is present on-site. As a result, project implementation would have no impact on
these resources.
d) The majority of the surrounding area has been or is being developed, thereby disrupting any wildlife
corridors that may have existed. Also see comments noted under a) above for additional
documentation. No adverse impacts are anticipated.
e) There are no heritage trees on the project site; therefore, the proposed project is not in conflict with
any local ordinance.
f) The project site is not located within a conservation area according to the General Plan, Open
Space and Conservation Plan, Exhibit IV-4. No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur.
5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance () () () (/)
of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5?
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance () (/) () ( )
of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5?
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological () (/) () ( )
resource or site or unique geologic feature?
d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred () () () (/)
outside of formal cemeteries?
Comments:
a) The project site does not contain any existing structures, nor has it been identified as a "Historic
Resource" in the City. The project surrounds the parcel at the intersection that contains the
Aggazzotti home, formerly a winery and designated Historic Point of Interest (not a part of project).
No impact to historical resources will occur with implementation of the proposed project.
b) There are no known archeological sites or resources recorded on the project site; however, the
Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the
General Plan FEIR (Section 5.11). Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation, and
compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources.
The following mitigation measures shall be implemented:
1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading,
the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to
take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance
of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will:
Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or
significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its
archaeological value.
Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites
within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point.
P142
Initial Study for
DDA2005-01007, SUBTT17818 and DRC2005-01084
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 11
Less Than
slgni6cant Less
Issues and Su ortin Information Sources:
pp g Pole^Ilally
sig^amam wuh
Mtigauon rnan
sigmlicam
No
Imoad Incomoratetl Imgad Impact
• Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area
Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to
eliminate ,adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique
prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEOA guidelines.
• Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory,
evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit
one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San
Bernardino County Archaeologicallnformation Center for permanent archiving.
c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5.11) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial
fan. According to the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have
been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the Sphere-of-Influence, including the
project site; however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources. The older
alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000
years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and
the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils. The project
site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per General Plan Exhibit V-2; therefore, the following
mitigation measures shall be implemented:
2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction field survey of the project
site. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific
recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological
monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the
program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures:
• Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid
removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the
interval of earth-disturbing activities.
Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-
disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If
construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should
immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find.
Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected
specimens with a copy of the report to the San Bernardino County Museum.
d) The proposed project is in an area that has already been disturbed by development. The project
site has already been disrupted by construction of infrastructure (curb, gutter, and streets),
surrounding developments, and annual discing for weed abatement. No known religious or sacred
sites exist within the project area. No adverse impacts are anticipated.
P143
Initial Study for
DDA2005-01007, SUBTT17818 and DRC2005-01084
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 12
Less Tnan
Significant Less
Issues and Su ortin Information Sources:
PP g Fotentlany
Significant was
Ml~igation man
Significant
Np
Impact Incoryoratetl Impact Im acl
6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project
a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial
adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death
involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated () () () (/)
on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault
Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the
area or based on other substantial evidence of a
known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and
Geology Special Publication 42.
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? () () () (/)
iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including () () () (/)
liquefaction?
iv) Landslides? () () () (/)
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? () (/) () ( )
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or () () () (/)
that would become unstable as a result of the project,
and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral
spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B () () () (/)
of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial
risks to life or property?
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of () () () (/)
septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems
where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste
water?
Comments:
a) No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho
Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Exhibit
V-1, and Section 5.1 of the General Plan FEIR. The Red Hill Fault passes approximately 3.5 miles
north of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 5 miles north. These faults are
both capable of producing M„, 6.0-7.0 earthquakes. Also, the San Jacinto Fault, capable of producing
up to Mw 7.5 earthquakes, is approximately 15 miles northeasterly of the site, and the San Andreas
Fault, capable of producing up to Mw 8.2 earthquakes, is approximately 12 miles northeasterly of the
site. Each of these faults can produce strong groundshaking. Adhering to the Uniform Building Code
will ensure that geologic impacts are less-than-significant.
b) The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to
April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems. Construction
activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary
problems of dust control; however, development of this project under the General Plan would help
to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are
established. Soil types on-site consist of Delhi fine sand, according to General Plan Exhibit•V-3,
with the moderate to high potential for bare soil blowing if left unprotected. Therefore, the following
fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant
levels:
P144
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DDA2005-01007, SUBTT17818 and DRC2005-01084 Page 13
Less Than
Significant Less
Issues and Su ortin Information Sources:
PP g Pmemially
Sgnificant wun
Mitigation Tna"
Signi~icant
No
Impact Incomoratetl Impact Impact
1) The site shalt be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by
SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,g emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD
Rule 403.
2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City
to reduce PM,g emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may
vary depending upon the time of year of construction.
3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize
PM,g emissions from the site during such episodes:
4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAoMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all
inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,g
emissions.
c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5.1) indicates that subsidence is generally associated with large
decreases or withdrawals of water from the aquifer. The project would not withdraw water from the
existing aquifer. The site is not within a geotechnical hazardous area or other unstable geologic
unit or soil type according to General Plan FEIR Figure 5.1-2. Soil types on-site consist of Tijunga
loamy sand soil, according to General Plan Exhibit V-3. No adverse impacts are anticipated.
d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the project site, is located on alluvial soil deposits.
These types of soils are not considered to be expansive. Soil types on-site consist of Tijunga
loamy sand soil association according to General Plan Exhibit V-3 and General Plan FEIR Exhibit
5.1-3. These soils typically have high permeability and runoff is slow to very sldw. The project site
has very gentle grades in southerly direction. No adverse impacts are anticipated.
e) The project will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater
disposal. No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed.
7. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the project:
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/)
environment through the routine transport, use, or
disposal of hazardous materials?
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/)
environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and
accident conditions involving the release of hazardous
materials into the environment?
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or () () () (/)
acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within
1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school?
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of () () () (/)
hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to
Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result,
would it create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment?
P145
Initial Study for
DDA2005-01007, SUBTT17818 and DRC2005-01084
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 14
Less Than
Signiflcanf Less
Issues and Su ortin Information Sources:
PP g Pplapuauy
Significant With
Mitigation Than
Significant
No
Impact InWtppreted Impact Impact
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/)
where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles
of a public airport or public use airport, would the project
result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in
the project area?
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would () () () (/)
the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or
working in the project area?
g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an () () () (/)
adopted emergency response plan or emergency
evacuation plan?
h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, () () () (/)
injury or death involving wildland fires, including where
wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where
residences are intermixed with wildlands?
Comments:
a) The project will not involve the transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials. The City
participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous
Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the state. The City has adopted a
Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to
chemical emergencies. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the
storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant
impacts to a level less-than-significant. The proposed industrial buildings are to be constructed as
speculative with no definitive users at this time. The potential for hazardous materials will be
evaluated at the time of tenant improvement plan check and business license. No adverse impacts
are expected.
b) The proposed project does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels. The
proposed industrial buildings are to be constructed as speculative with no definitive users at this
time. The potential for hazardous materials will be evaluated at the time of tenant improvement plan
check and business license. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is
considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other
in the state. The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard
Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies. Compliance with Federal, State, and local
regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce
the potential for significant impacts to a level-less-than significant. No adverse impacts are
anticipated.
c) There are no schools located within 1/4 mile of the project site. The project site is located within
2 miles of the nearest existing or proposed school. The proposed industrial buildings are to be
constructed as speculative with no definitive users at this time. The City's Development Code
requires that all uses within this Subarea 7 are "to be operated so as not to emit matter causing
unpleasant odors, which are perceptible to the' average person beyond any lot line of the lot
containing such uses...." No adverse impacts are anticipated.
d) The proposed industrial building project is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials
site. Recent site inspection did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of
hazardous materials. No impact is anticipated.
P146
Initial Study for
DDA2005-01007, SUBTT17818 and DRC2005-01084
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 15
Less Than
Significant Less
Issues and Su ortin Information Sources:
PP g Fntenranv
Significant wnn
Mitigation Than
Significant
No
Impact Inco oratetl Impact Impact
e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport.
The project site is located approximately 3.5 miles north of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of
the flight path. No impact is anticipated.
The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2.5 miles to the west of the
City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated.
g) The City's Multi-Hazard Disaster Plan, which is updated every two years, includes policies and
procedures to be administered by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District in the event of a disaster.
Because the project includes at least two points of public street access and is required to comply
with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated.
h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from awind-driven fire in the Urban Wildland
Interface area found in the northern part of the City according to the Fire District Strategic Plan
2000-2005; however, the proposed project site is not located within a high fire hazard area
according to General Plan Exhibit V-7.
8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project:
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge () () () (/)
requirements?
b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere () (/) () ( )
substantially with groundwater recharge such that there
would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of
the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate
of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which
would not support existing land uses or planned uses for
which permits have been granted)?
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site () (/) () ( )
or area, including through the alteration of the course of a
stream or river, in a manner which would result in
substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site?
d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site () () () (/)
or area, including through the alteration of the course of a
stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or
amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result
in flooding on- or off-site?
e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the () () () (/)
capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage
systems or provide substantial additional sources of
polluted runoff?
f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? () (/) () ( )
g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as () () () (/)
mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood
Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation
map?
h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures () () () (/)
which would impede or redirect flood flows?
P147
Initial Study for
DDA2005-01007, SUBTT17818 and DRC2005-01084
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 16
Less Than
Significant Less
Issues and Su ortin Information Sources:
pp g Fmemiaoy
significant With
Mingatipn Than
Slgmficant
No
Impact IpCpl Omtetl Impact Impact
i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, () () () (/)
injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a
result of the failure of a levee or dam?
j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? () () () (/)
Comments
a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) and will not
affect water quality standards or waste discharge requirements. The project is designed to connect
to existing water and sewer systems.
b) According to CVWD, 43 percent of the City's water is currently provided from groundwater in the
Cucamonga and Chino Basins. CVWD has adopted a master plan that estimates demand needs
until the year 2030. The proposed project will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere
with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground
according to General Plan Exhibit IV-2. The development of the site will require the grading of the
site and excavation; however, would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 288 to
470 feet below the ground surface. As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.9), continued
development citywide will increase water needs and is a significant impact; however, CVWD has
plans to meet this increased need through the construction of future water facilities. The following
mitigation measure shall be implemented:
1) Structures to retain precipitation and runoff on-site shall be integrated into the design
of the project where appropriate. Measures that may be used to minimize runoff and
to enhance infiltration include Dutch drains, precast concrete lattice blocks and
bricks, terraces, diversions, runoff spreaders, seepage pits, and recharge basins.
c) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of
surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site;
however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to
existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project design
includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion. A grading and drainage plan
must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits.
Therefore, the project will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site. The following
mitigation measure shall be implemented:
2) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall prepare a Storm Water
Prevention Pollution Plan (SW PPP) that identifies Best Management Practices (BMPs)
to be implemented during the period the site is under construction. BMPs shall be
identified on the grading plans for review and approval by the City Engineer.
d) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of
surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site;
however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to
existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A grading and
drainage plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of
grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site.
No impacts are anticipated.
e) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of
surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site;
P148
Initial Study for
DDA2005-01007, SUBTT17818 and DRC2005-01084
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 17
Less Than
Significant Less
Issues and Su ortm Information Sources:
pp g Potentlauy
Significam With
Mitigation Than
Slgnilicarn
No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to
handle the flows. The project will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. A
grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to
issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on-
or off-site. No impacts are anticipated.
Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the
amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in
surface water quality impacts. The site is more than 1 acre; therefore, is required to comply with
the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution.
3) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer
for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WOMP), including a project
description and identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the
storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WIMP shall identify the
structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New
Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in
June 2004.
4) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall submit to the City
Engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National
Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water
Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been
obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Dischargers Identification Number) shall be
submitted to the City Engineer for coverage under the NPDES General Construction
Permit.
g) No housing units are proposed with this project. No adverse impacts are expected.
h) The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan
Exhibit V-5. No adverse impacts are expected.
The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to
convey a 100-year storm event. The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated
approach for regional and local drainage flows. This existing system includes several debris dams
and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, .and underground storm
drains as shown in General Plan Exhibit V-6. The project site is not located within a 100-year flood
hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5. No adverse impacts are expected.
There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the project site; therefore, impacts from seiche and
tsunami are not anticipated. The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern
San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams. Numerous man-made
controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance
within the City. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and
spreading grounds both within and north of the City.
P149
Initial Study for
DDA2005-01007, SUBTT17818 and DRC2005-01084
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 18
Less Than
Significant Less
Issues and Su ortin Information Sources:
PP g Pp+entiany
Significam weh
Mitigation man
Significant
No
Impact Incpryorafetl Impact Irtpad
9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project:
a) Physically divide an established community?
()
()
()
(/)
b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or () () () (/)
regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project
(including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan,
local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for
the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental
effect?
c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or () () () (/)
natural community conservation plan?
Comments:
a) The proposed Code Amendment from Industrial Park (Subarea 7) to General Commercial will make
the subject site compatible with the General Plan designation of General Commercial. Properties
to the northwest and west (Masi Plaza) are also designated as General Commercial and the District
amendment proposal will be in compliance with existing and recently approved commercial retail
uses in the surround area. The proposed Code reclassification and development project should not
create any conflicts with the existing land uses in the area and should remain consistent with the
land use designation of the General Plan for the site. The project will become a part of the larger
community. No adverse impacts are anticipated.
b) The proposed District amendment from Industrial Park (Subarea 7) to General Commercial will
make the subject site compatible with the General Plan Designation of General Commercial. The
proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and does not interfere with any policies for
environmental protection. As such, no impacts are anticipated.
c) The project site is located in an area developed with commercial and professional office uses. The
site has been previously disrupted during annual discing for weed abatement. According to the
General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5.3 of the General Plan FEIR, the project site is within an
area of sensitive biological resources.
10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral () () () (/)
resource that would be of value to the region and the
residents of the State?
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important () () () (/)
mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local
general plan, specific plan or other land use plan?
Comments:
a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General
Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1; therefore, there is no impact.
b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, as a valuable mineral
resource recovery site; therefore, there is no impact.
P150
Initial Study for
DDA2005-01007, SUBTT17818 and DRC2005-01084
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 19
Less Than
Significant Less
Issues and Su ortin Information Sources:
PP g Ppta"tiaoy
Significant wun
Mitigation Tnan
Significant
N°
Impact Inver oratetl Impact Impact
11. NOISE. Would the project result in.
a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in () (/) () ( )
excess of standards established in the local general plan
or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other
agencies?
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive () () () (/)
grcundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels?
c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels () () () (/)
in the project vicinity above levels existing without the
project?
d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient () (/) () ( )
noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing
without the project?
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/)
where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles
of a public airport or public use airport, would the project
expose people residing or working in the project area to
excessive noise levels? '
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would O O O (/)
the project expose people residing or working in the
project area to excessive noise levels?
Comments:
a) The commercial retail and protessional office uses and retail commercial associated with this type
of project normally do not produce noise. The City's Development Code requires that all uses in
Subarea 7 be operated in a manner so as to not generate noise level exceeding 75Ldn as
measured at the lot line of the source. Noise levels will exceed 65dBA across the entire site
because of traffic noise from Foothill Boulevard and the I-15 Freeway that is approximately
1,250 feet to the east. The City's standard is 65Ldn and 75Ldn for interior and exterior noise levels
in the Industrial Park District. According to General Plan Exhibit V-13, conventional construction,
with closed windows and fresh air supply systems or air conditioning, will suffice without any special
noise insulation requirements. The City's Development Code requires that all industrial uses be
conducted within an enclosed building; hence, no adverse operational impact to nearby uses is
expected. The General Plan FEIR (Section 5.7) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site
stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate
noise exceeding City standards. The site adjoins a single-family residence. The following
measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts:
1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and
6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national
holiday.
2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in
Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. The
developer shall hire a consultant to pertorm weekly noise level monitoring as specified
in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by
the Planning Department. The said consultant shall report their findings to the
Planning Department within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above
standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planning Department. If
P151
Initial Study for
DDA2005-01007, SUBTT17818 and DRC2005-01084
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 20
Less Than
Significant Less
Issues and Su ortin Information Sources:
PP g Pctenranv
Significant Wifi
Mitigation Than
Slgnilicant
No
Impact nwrporaletl Inpact mead
noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced
in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted.
3) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m.
on weekdays, including Saturday, or any time on Sunday or a national holiday.
Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting
both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise
mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible,
the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential
dwellings.
b) The professional office and commercial retail uses associated with this type of project normally do
not induce groundborne vibrations. The City's Development Code requires that all uses in
Subarea 7 be operated in a manner so as not to generate vibration discernible without instruments
by the average persons beyond the lot upon which the source is located. As such, no impacts are
anticipated.
c) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic. The proposed
activities will not significantly increase traffic; hence, are not anticipated to increase the ambient
noise levels within the vicinity of the project.
d) During the construction phases of development, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction
equipment, will generate noise exceeding 65dBA. The mitigation measures listed under a)
response above will reduce impact to aless-than-significant level.
e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport.
The site is located approximately 4 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the
flight path. No impact is anticipated.
The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2.5 miles to the west of the
City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated.
12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project:
a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either () () () (/)
directly (for example, by proposing new homes and
businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension
of roads or other infrastructure)?
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, () () () (/)
necessitating the construction of replacement housing
elsewhere?
c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the () () () (/)
construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
Comments:
a) The project is located in a predominantly developed area and will not induce population growth.
Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area.
Once constructed, the proposed project will have a limited number of employees; hence, will not
create a demand for additional housing as a majority of the employees will likely be hired from
within the City or surrounding communities. No impacts are anticipated.
P152
Initial Study for
DDA2005-01007, SUBTT17818 and DRC2005-01084
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 21
Less Than
Significant Less
Issues and Su ortin Information Sources:
PP 9 I=p+enraly
s gnitlcant wan
Mitlga,mn Than
slgnuipaM
Nn
Impact Incomoratetl Imoad Impact
b) The project site contains no existing housing units. No adverse impact expected.
c) The project site is vacant land. No impacts are anticipated.
13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial
adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new
or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or
physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of
which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to
maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other
pertormance objectives for any of the public services:
a) Fire protection? () () () (/)
b) Police protection? () () () (/)
c) Schools? () () () (/)
d) Parks? () () () (/)
e) Other public facilities? () () () (/)
Comments:
a) The site is rectangular in shape and is comprised of two parcels. It is vacant with sparse vegetation
and weeds covering the majority of the site and has evidence of discing for weed abatement
purposes. To the north of Foothill Boulevard is the recently approved commercial center
Conditional Use Permit DRC2005-00365; to the east is an Edison Power Line Corridor; to the south
is vacant land with a professional office project that will be reviewed for entitlement by the Planning
Commission on December 13, 2006; and to the wesUnorth are the Aggazzotti home, formerly a
winery and designated Historic Point of Interest (not a part of project), and the Masi Plaza
commercial center across the street of Rochester Avenue. The site would be served by a fire
station located approximately 1 mile from the project site. The project will not require the
construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the
levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Standard Conditions of
Approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the project so no impacts to
fire services will occur. No impacts are anticipated.
b) Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the project will not change the pattern
of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be
patrolled as the project site is within an area that is regularly patrolled.
c) The site is in a developed area currently served by the Cucamonga School District and the Chaffey
Joint Union High School District. The project will be required to pay School Fees as prescribed by
State law prior to the issuance of building permits. No impacts are anticipated.
d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest
park, the Quakes Epicenter (Adult Sports Complex), is located across the street from the project
site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any exisiing
facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new
facilities. A Standard Condition of Approval will require the developer to pay Park Development
Fees. No impacts are anticipated.
P153
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DDA2005-01007, SUBTT17818 and DRC2005-01084 Page 22
Less Than
Significant Lass '
Issues and Su ortin Information Sources:
pp g ante"'lolly
Significant wan
Mitigation Than
Significant
No
Impact Incor oratetl Im acf Impact
e) The proposed project will utilize existing public facilities. The site is in a developed area, currently
served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The project will not require the construction of any new
facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could
cause the need to construct new facilities. Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will
increase demand for library services. According to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.9.9), the
projected increase in library space under the General Plan will not meet the projected demand.
The General Plan FEIR identified the cumulative impact on library services as a significant
unavoidable adverse impact for which a statement of overriding conditions was ultimately adapted
by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the EIR
was prepared and impacts evaluated. Since the adoption of the General Plan, the City has
constructed a new library within the Victoria Gardens regional shopping center of approximately
22,000 square feet (which opened this past September), is in excess of the projected need of
15,500 square feet at build-out of the City.
14. RECREATION. Would the project:
a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional () () () (/)
parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial
physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be
accelerated?
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require () () () (/)
the construction or expansion of recreational facilities
which might have an adverse physical effect on the
environment?
Comments:
a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by [he City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest
park, the Quakes Epicenter (Adult Sport Complex), is located across the street from the project site.
This project is not proposing any new housing or large employment generator that would cause an
increase in the use of parks or other recreational facilities. A Standard Condition of Approval will
require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated.
b) See a) response above.
15. TRANSPORTATIONfTRAFFIC. Would the project:
a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in () () () (/)
relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the
street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in
either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity
ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)?
b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of () () () (/)
service standard established by the county congestion
management agency for designated roads or highways?
c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either () () () (/)
an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that
results in substantial safety risks?
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature () () () (/)
(e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
P154
Initial Study for
DDA2005-01007, SUBTT17818 and DRC2005-01084
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 23
Less Than
significant Less
Issues and Su ortin Information Sources:
PP 9 Fp,enoally
signuican, wnh
Miaganen man
s~gnnmam
Np
Impact' Incorporated Im act Impact
e) Result in inadequate emergency access? () () () (/)
f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? () () () (/)
g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs () () () (/)
supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts,
bicycle racks)?
Comments:
a) The 39,400 square foot professional office will generate 715 average daily trips (ADT), and the
25,030 square foot retail portion (factored as General Commercial) equates to 1,188 ADTs
according to the City's Traffic Model based upon 18.14 trips per 1,000 square feet of office use,
47.50 per 1,000 square feet for the retail portion. As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.5),
continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area. The
proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts
evaluated. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or
included in project design. The project will not create a substantial increase in the number of
vehicle trips, traffic volume or congestion at intersections. The project site will be required to
provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per
City roadway standards. In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development Fee
that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits. Fees are used to fund
roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation. No impacts are
anticipated. .
b) The 39,400 square foot professional office will generate 92/93 am/pm daily peak hour trips, and the
25,030 square foot retail portion (factored as General Commercial) equates to 27/95 am/pm daily
peak hour trips according to the City's Traffic Model. Therefore, this project will generate less than
250 two-way peak hour vehicle trips for non-retail land use; therefore, is below the threshold of the
San Bernardino Congestion Management Plan (CMP) criteria for requiring a traffic impact analysis.
The project is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing. The project
will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adjacent arterials. The project will be
required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the
site. No impacts are anticipated.
c) Located approximately 4 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight
path and will not change air traffic patterns. No impacts are anticipated.
d) The project is in an area that is mostly developed. The project will be required to provide street
improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. The project design
does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses. The project will,
therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature. No impacts are
anticipated.
e) The project will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles and will, therefore, not
create an inadequate emergency access. No impacts are anticipated.
f) The project design has adequate parking in compliance with standards of the Rancho Cucamonga
Development Code and will, therefore, not create an inadequate parking capacity. No impacts are
anticipated.
g) The project design includes, or the project will be conditioned to provide, features supporting
transportation and vehicle trip reduction (e.g., bus bays, bicycle racks, carpool parking, etc.).
P155
Initial Study for
DDA2005-01007, SUBTT17818 and DRC2005-01084
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 24
Less Tnan
Significarn Less
Issues and Su ortin Information Sources:
PP g Pptenilaily
Significant will,
Mitigation rnan
Significant
No
' Impact Incotpotatatl Impact Impact
16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project:
a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the () () () (/)
applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board?
b) Require or result in the construction of new water or () () () (/)
wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing
facilities, the construction of which could cause significant
environmental effects?
c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water () () () (/)
drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant
environmental effects?
d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the () () () (/)
project from existing entitlements and resources, or are
new or expanded entitlements needed?
e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment () () () (/)
provider, which serves or may serve the project, that it
has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected
demand in addition to the provider's existing
commitments?
f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to () () () (/)
accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs?
g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and () () () (/)
regulations related to solid waste?
Comments:
a) The proposed project is served by the CVW D sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland
Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga. The
project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control
Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated.
b) The proposed project is served by the CVW D sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland
Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1
located within the City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity. The project is required to meet
the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater.
No impacts are anticipated.
c) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the
flows. A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer
prior to issuance of grading permits. The impact is not considered significant.
d) The CVWD provides water treatment, storage, and distribution of domestic water to Rancho
Cucamonga, portions of the cities of Ontario and Fontana, and a tract in Upland. The current daily
water usage in the CVW D service area is 41.7 million gallons per day (mgd). Residential water use
amounts to about 60 percent of the total water consumed. Landscaping (public and private) is the
next largest consumer of water at 20 percent.
Based on the proposed use and size, the project does not fall under the requirements of SB 610
and SB 221, and, therefore, would not require a Water Supply Assessment. The CVWD has an
adopted master plan that estimated water demand and supply needs until the year 2030. The
P156
Initial Study for
DDA2005-01007, SUBTT17818 and DRC2005-01084
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 25
Less Than
Significant Less
Issues and Su ortin Information Sources:
PP 9 Pptentiany
Slgnificam with
Mitigation man
Significant
No
Impact Incorporatetl Impact Impact
CVW D is responsible for collecting developer fees for the construction and operation of water and
wastewater facilities. Proposed water usage and sewer flows would be in accordance with what
was determined at the time of the General Plan adoption, and is not considered significant. The
project is served by the CVWD water system. There is currently a sufficient water supply available
to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this project. No impacts are anticipated.
e) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland
Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1
located within the City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity. No impacts are anticipated.
Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse
at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs.
g) This project complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste.
The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent
with AB 939. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated.
17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality () () (/) ( )
of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a
fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population
to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate
a plant or animal community, reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal,
or eliminate important examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory?
b) Does the project have impacts that are individually () () () (/)
limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively
considerable" means that the incremental effects of a
project are considerable when viewed in connection with
the effects of past projects, the effects of other current
projects, and the effects of probable future projects)?
c) Does the project have environmental effects which will () () () (/)
cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
Comments:
a) The project site is located in an area developed with office/professional and retail commercial uses.
The site has been previously disrupted during annual discing for weed abatement. According to the
General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5.3 of the General Plan FEIR, the project site is not within
an area of sensitive biological resources.
b) If the proposed project were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in
accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The 2001 General Plan was
adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of
Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build-out in the City and
Sphere-of-Influence. The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in
significant adverse effects to aggregate resources, prime farmland, air quality, the acoustical
environment, library services, and aesthetics and visual resources. Mitigation measures were
adopted for each of these resources; however, they would not reduce impacts to
less-than-significant levels. As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations
P157
Initial Study for
DDA2005-01007, SUBTT17818 and DRC2005-01084
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 26
Less Than
Significant Less
Issues and Su ortin Information Sources:
pp g Potanrally
Significam wuh
Mnigaticn Than
Significant
No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant
unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)). These benefits
include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use projects that will be pedestrian friendly
and conservation of valuable natural open space. With these findings and the Statement of
Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required.
c) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse
effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The Initial Study identifies
construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact.
Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels. Additionally, impacts resulting
from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities were completed.
The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to
increased noise levels. Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are
at less-than-significant levels.
P158
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DDA2005-01008, SUBTT17818, and DRC2005-01084 Page 27
EARLIER ANALYSES
Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one
or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section
15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately
analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects
were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses
were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply):
(/) General Plan FEIR
(SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001)
APPLICANT CERTIFICATION
I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I have
read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the project plans or
proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the
effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur.
Applicant's Signatur~
Date:
I z- ~8-ob
Print Name and Title: G~rI1f $upy,o.~„ QSSaOt~-
P159
Mike Smith, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. He reported that his description of the
-,,Her e t at a neighborhood meeting was held on November 2, 2006. He said that a re
Sean Stone, residing on Hemlock Street contacted him regarding the project. His cone eluded
loss of views, glare from lights and landscaping. Mr. Smith reported that was a alleviate Mr.
Stone's concerns in that the project will not cause a signifcant loss iews ause the height of
the buildings will be lower than the maximum allowed and that hei of the buildings will be
much lower than the finished pad elevations of the homes no oft ite; that the lights will be on
timers to mitigate excessive nighttime glare; and, that the I ds ing along Vineyard Avenue will
be enhanced with the project.
Chairman Stewart asked if the color renderings be' g wn this evening are the color palette that
was presented to the Design Review Committe .
Mr. Smith explained that the printer had a r in the intensity of the red shown on the pictures.
He assured the Commission that the ac a d will be softer/lighter than what is shown and much
closer to the swatch that was original) sented.
Chairman Stewart opened the
Vic Hizon, 16736 Almaden D ' ,Fontana, stated he is the architect on the project and stated he
and the owner have read staff report and concurs with staffs conditions of approval. He
concurred that the actual or requirements will be complied with.
Chairman Stewart clued the public hearing.
Commissioner oz stated the project is a good fit for the area, it is a nice looking project and that
the developer pears to have addressed the concerns of the neighbors. He moved to approve.
Commissi r McPhail concurred.
Motio Moved by Munoz, seconded by McPhail, to adopt the Resolution of Approval for
De o ent Review DRC2005-00831. Motion carried by the following vote:
MACIAS, MUNOZ, McPHAIL, STEWART
NONE
..<..
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT
DRC2005-01008 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to change the Development
District from Industrial Park (Subarea 7) to General Commercial (to reflect the current General
Plan Designation of General Commercial), located at the southeast cornerof Foothill Boulevard
and Rochester Avenue -APN: 0229-021-31 and 32. Related Files: Conditional Use Permit
DRC2005-01084, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17818. This item will be forwarded to the City
Council for final action.
C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17818 -
CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to subdivide 12.66 net acres of land into
6 parcels for commercial and professional office purposes designated as General Commercial
and within the Industrial Park District (Subarea 7), located at the southeast corner of
Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue -APN: 0229-021-31 and 32. Related Files:
Conditional Use Permit DRC2005-01084 and Development District Amendment
Planning Commission Minute EXH I B IT D January 24, 2007
P160
DRC2005-01008. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental
impacts for consideration.
D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2005-01084 -
CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES -The development of a master plan for an office and
commercial center consisting of one bank with drive-thru at 4,500 square feet (Building A), one
drive-thru restaurant at 2,430 square feet (Building B), two restaurant buildings totaling
13,000 square feet (Buildings C and E), one retail multi-tenant/restaurant building at
5,100 square feet (Building D), and atwo-story 39,400 square foot medical office (Building F)
on 12.66 net acres of land in the designated as General Commercial and within the Industrial
Park District (Subarea 7), located at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and
Rochester Avenue - APN: 0229-021-31 and 32. Related Files: Tentative Parcel Map
SUBTPM17818 and Development DistrictAmendment DRC2005-01008. Staffhas prepared a
Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration.
Doug Fenn, Associate Planner, presented the staff report
Chairman Stewart opened the public hearing.
Chuck Buquet, Charles Joseph Associates, 10681 Foothill Boulevard, Suite 395, stated he
represents the applicants. He noted that the site plan has changed and improved over the 1 and Yz
years they have been in the process. He said he is proud of the unique design/building materials
and that it has elements reminiscent of the Virginia Dare Winery and that it is pedestrian and
restaurant friendly. He said that he believes that in working with the Sheraton project across the
street, they have created complementary projects that will work well together. He said he has
reviewed all the conditions and that he asked to clarify Condition # 2c found on Page B, C, D 123 of
the agenda packet. He stated he had met with the traffc engineer regarding the "Not-A-Part" parcel
on the corner and the related frontage improvements on Rochester Avenue associated with his
project development. He said this condition is not a condition of his development but of the "Not-A-
Part" parcel. He reported that if the owner of the parcel mentioned participates then the
improvements will not be required of him. He said if the City acquires the right of way around that
frontage, and if the timing works out with the planned street improvements, then he will go ahead
and construct the improvements with the fee-reimbursement due to his applicants.
Chairman Stewart asked Dan James, Sr. Civil Engineer to comment.
Dan James, Sr. Civil Engineer explained that the condition is tied to the "Not - A -Part" parcel
because it is not being developed at this time. He said ultimately staff could make the change of the
requirement during plan check. He said he expects more discussion with the owners of this parcel
before coming to a resolution of what the final condition will require but that there is no need to
change the condition now. He added that there will be no need to come back to the Commission for
modification in regard to this condition.
Commissioner Munoz asked if they might come up with a better name than "Footchester."
Mr. Buquet reported that a project name change is already in the process.
Chairman Stewart commented that the project has nice energy and that it has evolved over the
course of time. She added that staff worked really hard on this one as usual.
Motion: Moved by McPhail, seconded by Macias, to adopt the Resolutions approving Tentative
Parcel Map SUBTPM17818 and Development Review DRC2005-01084 with the issuance of a
Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts and to recommend approval for
Planning Commission Minutes -3- January 24, 2007
P161
Development District Amendment DRC2005-01008 that will be forwarded to the City Council forfinal
action. Motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: MACIAS, MUNOZ, McPHAIL, STEWART
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: FLETCHER -carried
.....
~TENTA
vi e 2.235 acres into two parcels in the Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial (Sub Area
located south of Jersey Boulevards and west of Rochester Avenue - APN: 0229-111-0 is
project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environ I Quality
Act (CEQA) pursuant to the State CEQA guidelines Section 15315, Minor L bdivisions.
Doug Fenn, Associate Planner presented the staff report and noted that s a "housekeeping
item" for a subdivision of a design review approval that had already b rocessed.
Chuck Buquet, Charles Joseph Associates, 10681 Foothill B ward, Suite 395, stated he
represents the owner and noted that this is just an overlay of tier map for a project previously
processed.
Chairman Stewart opened the public hearing and seein nd hearing no comment, closed the public
hearing.
Motion: Moved by McPhail, seconded by `ias, to adopt the Resolution of Approval for
Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17988 and ca d by the following vote:
AYES: MACIAS, MUNOZ, McPHAIL, S ART
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: FLETCHER
.,_.,.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None
.....
Commissioner acia commented that SCAG has produced their draft of the Regional Needs
Assessmen e sa' that SCAG Board will review the Countyallocations on February 1, 2007. He
asked st o brief e Commission on the Regional Housing Needs Assessment process which will
be con ered o February 1, 2007, and the Rancho Cucamonga allocation stemming from that
meeting.
....~
Planning Commission Minutes -4- January 24, 2007
P162
RESOLUTION N0.07-04
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF
AN ORDINANCE TO ENACT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT
DRC2005-01008, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
FROM INDUSTRIAL PARK (SUBAREA 7) TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL (TO
REFLECT THE CURRENT GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION OF GENERAL
COMMERCIAL), LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL
BOULEVARD AND ROCHESTER AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0229-021- 31 AND 32.
A. Recitals
1. Charles Joseph Associates filed an application for Development District Amendment
DRC2005-01008, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject
Development District Amendment is referred to as "the application."
2. On January 24, 2007, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date.
All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is herebyfound, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part
A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the
above-referenced public hearing on January 24, 2007, including written and oral staff reports, together
with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to approximately 12.66 net acres of land located at the
southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue and is presently vacant. Said property is
currently designated as Industrial Park (Subarea 7); and
b. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and
will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with
the surrounding development by providing opportunities for office, hospitality, and commercial land
uses that will provide support uses and services for the nearby Commercial Districts located in the
vicinity of the area of the project site; and
c. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element by
allowing for commercial-related uses such as restaurants, banks, fast food, and other similar retail and
office uses to be developed under one land use district utilizing master planning; and
d. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent
properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment, nor the surrounding properties
because the amendment will allow for office, retail, and food uses to be integrated into amaster-
^~^^^^~ -~^~-^~^^m^^* ~ ~^-~^~ ^^~ land use district.
EXHIBIT E
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 0-04
DRC2005-01008 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES
January 24, 2007
Page 2
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the
above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2
above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in
terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area as evidenced by
its frontage on a public street and the evidence of similar uses existing in the immediate area; and
b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment,
nor the surrounding properties as evidenced by the existing commercial development and activities in
the immediate area; and
c. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the existing General Plan
designation General Commercial.
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative
Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included forthe environmental assessment forthe
application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will
have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends that the City Council adopt a Mitigated
Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this
reference, based upon the findings as follows:
a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local
CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the
project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the
imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the projectwould have a
significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration
was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the
intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration.
b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all
comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it,
finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based
on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a
significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative
Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these
findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration.
c. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring
Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources
Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the
mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission, therefore, adopts the
Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project.
d. Pursuant to the requirements of California Fish and Game Code Section 711.4 and
Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 753.5, the Planning Commission finds, based on
the Initial Study, the Mitigated Negative Declaration, and considering the record as a whole, that there
is no evidence before the City that the proposed project will have the potential for an adverse effect on
wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends. The project site is surrounded by
industrial and commercial development, and the site has not been identified as potential location for
habitat that is known to support sensitive biological species. Further, the site contains no blue line
streams. Based on substantial evidence, the Planning Commission hereby makes a declaration
rebutting the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in California Department of Fish and Game
P163
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 0-04
DRC2005-01008 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES
January 24, 2007
Page 3
Regulation 753.5 (Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations Code, Section 753.5.)
e. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration,
Mitigation Monitoring Program, and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon
which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730,
telephone (909) 477-2750.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusion set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this
Commission hereby recommends approval of Development District Amendment DRC2005-01008, an
amendment to the Development District Map to change approximately 12.66 acres of land located at
the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue from Industrial Park (Subarea 7) to
General Commercial as described in the Resolution and shown as Exhibit A of the Draft City Council
Ordinance by adoption of the Draft City Council Ordinance and ihcluding the condition shown below.
Planninp Department
1) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action
brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the
issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such
approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or
employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its
agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a
result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its
own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall
not relieve the applicant of his obligations under this condition.
The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF JANUARY 2007.
PLANNING Ck7Ml0~1SSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
rman
ATTEST: Y~l.t2' ~ ~
James Troyer, AICP, Planning D' ector
I, James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by
the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 24th day of January 2007, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: _ MACIAS, McPHAIL, MUNOZ, STEWART
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER
P164
P165
City of Rancho Cucamonga
MITIGATION MONITORING
PROGRAM
Project File No.: Development District Amendment 2005-01008, Tentative Parcel Map
SUBTT17818, and Development Review DRC2005-01084.
This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation
measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project. This program
has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are
implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code).
Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements:
Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action
and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of
approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project.
2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This
procedure designates who will take action, what action will betaken and when, and to whom
and when compliance will be reported.
3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring
progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon
recommendations by those responsible for the program.
Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project
planner, assigned by the Planning Director, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project
planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly
and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the
conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department.
Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in
performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant.
2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its
corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached
hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when,
and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting.
documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority
for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following
address:
City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency
Planning Department
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
P166
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
DRC2005-01008, SUBTT17818, AND DRC2005-01084
Page 2
3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed,
as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific
mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner.
4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the
completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each
measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of
development.
5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off
as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP
Reporting Form.
6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation
measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or
additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible
City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational
personnel
The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of
construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after
written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also
has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure
attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the
authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented.
Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the
responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The Department shall
require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City.
These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to
monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time.
9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City
with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the
monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to
know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The
monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the
Community Development Director or Planning Director prior to the issuance of building
permits.
MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III)
Project File No.: DRC2005-01008, SUBTT17818, and DRC2005-01084 Applicant: Charles Joseph Associate
Initial Study Prepared by: Douglas Fenn Date: December 14, 2006
- - - .. -.
~ s K;?
Air Qualit
~ ~ - ar .Ar ,n.,R
! 7 n
~ ~ fi °{ r n _
~ <
^ 4'"' ,y; i P y
, r""'~ `"~ ,rte;
y .~ ,
All construction equipment shall be maintained in good PD C Review of Plans A/C 2/4
operating condition so as to reduce operational
emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all
construction equipment is being properly serviced and
maintained as per manufacturers' specifications.
Maintenance records shall be available at the
construction site for City verification.
Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the PD/BO C Review of Plans C 2
developer shall submit construction plans to the City
denoting the proposed schedule and projected
equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide
evidence that low-emission mobile construction
equipment will be utilized, or that their use was
investigated and found to be infeasible far the project.
Contractors shall also conform to any construction
measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality
Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City
Planning staff.
All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed PD C Review of Plans A/C 2/4
performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113.
Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or
high volume, low-pressure spray.
All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards BO B Review of Plans A/C 2
noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108.
All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD BO C Review of Plans A/C 2/4
Rules 402 anti 403. Additionally, contractors shall
include the following provisions:
Reestablish ground cover on the construction site g0 C Review of Plans A/C 2/4
through seedin and waterin .
1 of 7 ~
m
v
- ~• ~ ~
Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. g0 C Review of Plans A/C 2/4
Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large BO C Review of Plans A/C 2/4
areas to erosion over extended eriods of time.
Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of BO C Review of Plans A/C 2/4
exposed excavated soil during and after the end of
work eriods.
Dispose of surplus excavated material in BO C Review of Plans A 4
accordance with local ordinances and use sound
engineering practices.
Sweep streets according to a schedule established BO C During A 4
by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public construction
thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling.
Timing may vary depending upon time of year of
construction.
Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., BO C During A 4
wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with construction
Rule 403 re uirements.
Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils BO C Review of Plans A 4
haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other
suitable means.
The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During A 4
soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and the construction
Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWOCBj) daily
to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in
accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403.
Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO C During A 4
RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction
areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to
reduce PM,o emissions.
The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean BO C Review of Plans A/C 4
alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible.
The construction contractor shall ensure that BO C Review of Plans A/C 2/4
construction-grading plans include a statement that work
crews will shut off equipment when not in use.
All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs BO C Review of Plans A 4
requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged
periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes).
2 of 7 ~
rn
- - .. ., -
- ~:
All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate PD C Review of Plans A/C 2!3
preferential parking for vanpools.
All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or PD C Review of Plans D 2/3
more employees shall be required to post both bus and
Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas.
All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or PD C Review of Plans D 2/3
more employees shall be required to configure their
operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to
the extent reasonably leasible.
Cultural Resources ~` ~ `." `~:"
If any prehistoric archaeological resources are
encountered before or during grading, the developer will
retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction
activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or
preserve them for study. With the assistance of the
archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will:
Enact interim measures to protect undesiynated PD/BO C Review of A/D 3/4
sites from demolition or significant modification Report
without an opportunity for the City to establish its
archaeolo ical value.
Consider establishing provisions to require PD/80 C Review of A/D 3/4
incorporation of archaeological sites within new Report
developments, using their special qualities as a
theme or focal oint.
Pursue educating the public about the PD/BO C Review of A/D 3/4
archaeological heritage of the area. Report
Propose mitigation measures and recommend PD/BO C Review of A/D 3/4
conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project Report
effects on slynificant, important, and unique
prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA
guidelines.
3 of 7 ~
m
- ... - - ,
.:
Prepare a technical resources management report, PD C Review of A/D 3/4
documenting the inventory, evaluation, and Report
proposed mitigation of resources within the project
area. Submit one copy of the completed report, with
original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County
Archaeological Information Center for permanent
archivin .
A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a precohstruction PD B Review of A/D 4
field survey of the project site. The paleontologist shall Report
submit a report of findings that will also provide specific
recommendations regarding further mitigation measures
(i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be
appropriate. W here mitigation monitoring is appropriate,
the program must include, but not be limited to, the
tollowin measures:
Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and PD B Review of A/D 4
equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with Report
minimal construction delay, to the site full-time
durin the interval of earth-disturbin activities.
Should fossils be found within art area being cleared BO B/C Review of A/D 4
or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities Report
elsewhere until the.monitor has completed salvage.
It construction personnel make the discovery, the
grading contractor should immediately divert
construction and notif the monitor of the find.
Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho PD D Review of D 3
Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a Report
copy of the report to the San Bernardino County
Museum.
Geologic Problems " ' ` r ~ `
?'~
rl
~;: ~
r.`
"'
The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During A 4
soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and Construction
R W OCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance
with SCAOMD Rule 403.
Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a BO C During A 4
schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o Construction
emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil
orbsite. Tirniny may vary depending upon the time of
year of construction.
4 of 7 ~°
V
O
- .. -
- .. - -
Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO C During A 4
speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions Construction
from the site during such episodes.
Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO C During A 4
RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction Construction
areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to
reduce PM,o emissions.
Hydrology and Water Quality 7 irx, i ;;.; + ,; ;,. ~,m , . ,.~. ,
Structures to retain precipitation and runoff on-site shall BO B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4
be integrated into the design of the project where
appropriate. Measures that may be used to minimize
runoff and to enhance infiltration include Dutch drains,
precast concrete lattice blocks and bricks, terraces,
diversions, runoff spreaders, seepage pits, and recharge
basins.
Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall BO B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4
prepare a Storm Water Prevention Pollution Plan
(SW PPP) that identifies Best Management Practices
(BMPs) to be implemented during the period the site is
under construction. BMPs shall be identified on the
grading plans for review and approval by the City
Engineer.
Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall BO B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4
submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water
Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project
description and identifying BMPs that will be used
on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system
to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall
identify the structural and non-structural measures
consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and
Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho
Cucamonga June 2004.
5 of 7 ~
V
- -. -
.:
Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the BO B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4
applicant shall submit to the City Engineer a Notice of
Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit
from the State Water Resources Control Board.
Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the
Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be
submitted to the City Engineer for coverage under the
NPDES General Construction Permit.
Noise ... 1 , ~:,..
Construction or grading shall not take place between the BO C During A 4
hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, Construction
including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a
national holiday.
Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the BO C During A 4
standards specified in Development Code Section Construction
17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. The
developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly
noise level monitoring as specified in Development
Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may
be required by the Planning Department. The said
consultant shall report their findings to the Planning
Department within 24 hours; however, if noise levels
exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall
immediately notify the Planning Department. It noise
levels exceed the above standards, then construction
activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of
compliance with above noise standards or halted.
6of7 ~
V
N
.. . - ...
_ ~- -
Haul truck deliveries shall not lake place between the PO/BO C During A 4/7
hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, Construction
including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a
national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for
hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to
and from the construction site), then the developer shall
prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any
construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible,
the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass
sensitive land uses or residential dwellings.
Key to Checklist Abbreviations
Responsible Person
Monitoring Frequency ~ , ~..;
Method of Verificatwn ~ "" ~
Sanctions
CDD -Community Development Director
or designee A -With Each New
Development A - On-site Inspection 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final
Map
PD -Planning Director or designee B -Prior To Construction B -Other Agency Permit /Approval 2 -Withhold Grading or Building Permit
CE -City Engineer or designee C -Throughout Construction C -Plan Check 3 -Withhold Certificate of
Occupancy
BO -Building Official or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Plans) 4 -Stop Work Order
PO -Police Captain or designee E -Operating 5 -Retain Deposit or Bonds
FC -Fire Chief or designee 6 -Revoke CUP
7 -Citation
7 of 7 ~
V
W
_ City of Rancho Cucamonga
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
The following Mitigated Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with
the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code.
Project File No.: Development District Amendment DRC2005-01008, Tentative Parcel Map
SUBTPM17818, and Conditional Use Permit DRC2005-01084
Public Review Period Closes: January 24, 2007
Project Name: Project Applicant: Charles Joseph Associates
10681 Foothill Boulevard, Suite 395
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Project Location (also see attached map): Located at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard
and Rochester Avenue - APN: 0229-021-31 and 32.
Project Description: A request to change the Development District from Industrial Paris (Subarea 7)
to General Commercial (to reflect the current General Plan Designation of General Commercial) and
a request to subdivide 12.66 net acres of land into 6 parcels for an office and commercial center
consisting of one bank with drive-thru at 4,500 square feet (Building A), one drive-thru restaurant at
2,430 square feet (Building B), two restaurant Buildings totaling 13,000 square feet (Buildings C
and E), one retail multi-tenant/restaurant building at 5,10D square feet (Building D), and atwo-story
39,400 square foot medical office (Building F).
FINDING
This is to advise thatthe City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an
Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is
proposing this Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the following finding:
The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but:
(1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this
proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the
effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and
(2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project, as revised, may have a
significant effect on the environment.
If adopted, the Mitigated Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not
be required. The factual and analytical basis for this finding is included in the attached Initial
Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho
Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 orFax (909) 477-2847.
NO
The public is invited to comment on the
period.
January 24. 2007
Date of Determination
By
Declaration during the review
`~-~.
P174
P175
ORDINANCE NO. 7 /..7
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
AMENDMENT DRC2005-01008, CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A
REQUEST TO CHANGE THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT FROM
INDUSTRIAL PARK (SUBAREA- 7), TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL (TO
REFLECT THE CURRENT GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION OF GENERAL
COMMERCIAL), LOCATED AT-THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL
BOULEVARD AND ROCHESTER AVENUE, APN: 0229-021-31 AND 32;
AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
A. Recitals
1. Charles Joseph Associates filed an application for Development District Amendment
DRC2005-01008, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the
subject Development Code Amendment is referred to as "the application."
2. On January 24, 2007, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Development District Amendment and applications
and issued Resolution No. 07-04, recommending to the City Council that Development District
Amendment DRC2006-0108 be approved.
3. On March 7, 2007, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly
noticed public hearing on the application.
4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred
B. Ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and ordained by the City Council of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A,
of this Ordinance are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the
above-referenced public hearing on January 24, 2007, including written and oral staff reports,
together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to the property located within the City; and
b. The proposed amendment will not have a significant impact on the environment;
and
c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan
and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistentwith the General Plan and
with the surrounding development by permitting joint development of varying uses already in the
area; and
d. This amendment would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare,
materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact
on the environment nor on the surrounding properties; and
P176
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
DRC2005-01008 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES
March 7, 2007
Page 2
e. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan and objectives
of the Development Code by continuing a policy encouraging quality development through the
innovative application of existing design standards.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the
above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1
and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan
and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan
and with related development; and
This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Development Code,
and;
c. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and
d. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan.
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative
Declaration, togetherwith all written and oral reports included forthe environmental assessmentfor
the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the projectwill have a
signifcant effect upon the environment and adopts Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring
Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the Endings as
follows:
b. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines
promulgated thereunder; that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared
therefore reflect the independent judgment of the City Council; and, further, this Council has
reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with
regard to the application.
c. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifes certain significant
environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been
reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project that are listed in
the Mitigation Monitoring Program.
4. Based upon the fndings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Council hereby approves Development District Amendment DRC2005-01008 to amend the
District Maps in Section 17.30.030 -A and 17.30.080 -I of the Development Code in this Ordinance
and including the condition shown below.
Planning Department
1) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action
brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of
the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such
P177
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
DRC2005-01008 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES
March 7, 2007
Page 3
approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or
employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its
agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a
result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at
its own expense in the defense of any such action but such
participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this
condition.
5. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, orword of this Ordinance is, forany
reason, deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent
jurisdiction, or preempted by legislative enactment, such decision or legislation shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section,
subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, orwords thereof, regardless ofthe factthatanyone or more
sections, subsections, clauses, phrases, or words might subsequently be declared invalid or
unconstitutional or preempted by subsequent legislation
The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance.
~r-
R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
E N G I N E E R I N G D E P A L2 T M E N T
Staff Report
DATE: March 7, 2007
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Michael TenEyck, Administrative Resources Manager
SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA AMENDING ELECTRIC RATES, FEES AND CHARGES
PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS AND AUTHORITY OF CHAPTER 3.46 OF
TITLE 3 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE
RECOMMENDATION:
The City Council adopts a Resolution amending the existing electric rates, fees and
charges pursuant to the requirements and authority of Chapter 3.46 of Title 3 of the Rancho
Cucamonga Municipal Code.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga established a municipal utility on
August 31, 2001. The City has subsequently undertaken the actions necessary or
desirable to obtain electric power from energy suppliers and construct the necessary
facilities to distribute the acquired electric power to retail customers within the City. The
City Council has determined that the adoption of Electric Service Rules and Regulations is
necessary to further the orderly distribution of the electric power to the City's retail
customers.
On February 14, 2007, Southern California Edison (SCE) has part of their recent rate
change decreased their system average electric rate 0.8 percent below the previous
adopted rates. The change in Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility Electric Service Rates
is to maintain parity with (SCE) Electric Service Rates.
The City Council has subsequently adopted Chapter 3.46 of Title 3 of the Rancho
Cucamonga Municipal Code establishing Electricity Service Rules and Regulations and
authorizing that the rates, fees and charges, may be amended from time to time by
resolution.
P178
The City has provided the required notification to the public by publishing notice of this
hearing on February 20, 2007, and February 28, 2007, in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION ADOPTING RATES, FEES AND CHARGES PURSUANT TO THE
REQUIREMENTS AND AUTHORITY OF CHAPTER 3.46 OF TILE 3 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MUNICIPAL CODE
MARCH 7, 2007
PAGE z
local newspaper of general circulation, and posting notice in at least two separate locations
within the City. The proposed revised rates have been available for public review in the
City Clerk's Office since the advertisements and resolution were first published on February
20, 2007.
The City Council has assured itself that the amended rates fees and charges reflect the
City's reasonable and prudent costs for such an enterprise and do not establish unfair,
unreasonable or excessive rates that exceed the City's reasonable costs of doing business.
Respectfully Submitted,
-'~
~~~~ ~
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
P179
WJO:MT
P180
RESOLUTION NO. D7" OS7
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AMENDING ELECTRIC
RATES, FEES AND CHARGES PURSUANT TO THE
REQUIREMENTS AND AUTHORITY OF CHAPTER 3.46
OF TITLE 3 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MUNICIPAL CODE.
A. Recitals.
(i) The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has previously adopted
Chapter 3.46 of Title 3 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code establishing Electricity
Service Rules and Regulations and authorizing that the rates, fees and charges arising, directly or
indirectly, under said legislation be adopted pursuant to resolution, and thereafter, be amended
from time to time by resolution.
(ii) City staff has prepared a comprehensive schedule of the rates, fees and charges
that reflect the reasonable and prudent costs relating to the acquisition and distribution of electric
power to retail customers and are recotnmending that the City Council adopt the recommended
fees. These rates do not present the City an opportunity to achieve profits or to impose charges
in excess of the costs reasonably related to the development, maintenance and expansion of a
municipal electric distribution system. The City Council has directed City staff to regularly
review the operations of the City's electric utility to ensure that the rates are sufficient to cover
all prudent business costs, reserves and capital equipment acquisition but not exceeding the
amount necessary for the same. The rates, fees and charges reflect the reasonable costs to the
City system only and do not reflect any excess rates, fees, or charges that are in excess of the
reasonable costs of providirig the electrical services as set forth hereinafter.
(iii) The City Council has reviewed the adoption of this Resolution pursuant to the
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and has
determined that the adoption of the Electric Rules and Regulations has no foreseeable potential
to a result in a significant impact upon the environment and is exempt from CEQA review
pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3). Further, the City Council has
11231-0001\50772GvI.doc
P181
determined that the adoption of the fees is exempt from substantive environmental review under
Section 15273 of the State CEQA Guidelines as no capital projects for system expansion are
included in the proposed action.
(iv) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby
find and resolve as follows:
Section ]. The facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A of this Resolution, are true and
correct.
Section 2. The rates, fees and charges assessed under Chapter 3.46 of Title 3 shall be
as set forth on Attachment 1 hereto and incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein.
Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
II231-0001\507726v1.doc
P182
STAFF REPORT -
RANCHO
Date: March 7, 2007 CUCAMONGA
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
From: Kimberly S. Thomas, Management Analyst III, City Manager's Office
Subject: CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 7.02 OF TITLE 7
OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING NEW SECTIONS 7.02.050 AND 7.02.060
RELATING TO PEG SUPPORT FOR LOCAL CABLE USAGE AND SPECIAL
PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO HOLDERS OF STATE VIDEO FRANCHISES
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council hold a Public Hearing to consider adoption of the attached
Ordinance, Amending Chapter 7.02 of the Municipal Code.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
AB 2987-the Digitu! Infrastructure and Video Competition Act of 1006 is new legislation that preempts local
franchises and establishes the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) as the sole franchising
authority in California for video/cable service providers. Although there are many provisions of AB 2987
that are still ambiguous and will, likely result in conflicting interpretations, this new Slate control model
becomes operational this Spring. It is anticipated that State franchises will begin being granted by the CPUC
in April of this year.
On the advice of the City Attorney's Office, and to address the impending changes brought about by AB
2987, we are recommending this update to our City Telecommunication Ordinance to incorporate provisions
of the new State Franchise law into our Code. This will help to ensure the City's interests are protected, and
to provide a level playing field for both our incumbent providers (Charter Communications and Time
Warner), as v<-ell as any new providers that may serve Rancho Cucamonga in the future.
The City Council Telecommunications Subcommittee reviewed [his Amendment, as well as other issues
related to AB 2987 and changes in telecommunications on February 13'". The Subcommittee recommended
approval of this Amendment.
CONCLUSION
It is recommended that the City Council hold a Public Hearing and adopt the attached Ordinance, Amending
Chapter 7.02 ("Cable Television Systems'') of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code by adding Section
7.02.050 and 7.02.060.
Respectfully submitted,
imberly Th~a~
Management Analyst I11
Attachment(s) - Chapter 7.02 ("Cable Television Systems") of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal
Code Proposed Amendment Adding a new Section 7.02.050 and 7.02.060
- Chapter 7.02 ("Cable Television Systems'') of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code
P183
DRAFT UNTIL APPROVED
ORDINANCE NO. ~ 77
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA AMENDING CHAPTER 7.02 OF TITLE 7
OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING NEW SECTIONS
7.02.050 AND 7.02.060 RELATING TO PEG SUPPORT FOR
LOCAL CABLE USAGE AND SPECIAL PROVISIONS
APPLICABLE TO HOLDERS OF STATE VIDEO
FRANCHISES
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS
Section 1. Chapter 7.02 ("Cable Television Systems") of the Rancho Cucamonga
Municipal Code is amended by adding a new Section 7.02.050 to read as follows:
§ 7.02.050. Fee for Support of Local Cable Usage (Public, Educational, and
Government Channels or "PEG")
A fee paid to the City is hereby established for the support of public, educational, and
governmental access facilities and activities within the City. Unless a higher percentage is
authorized by applicable state or federal law, this fee shall be one percent (1%) of a Grantee's
gross annual cable service revenues. as that term is defined below in Section 7.05.010, or in the
Grantee's franchise agreement, or in applicable provisions of state or federal law. This fee is
also applicable to a state video franchise holder operating within the City, which shall pay to the
City one percent (1 %) of its gross revenue, as defined in California Public Utilities Code Section
5860.
Section 2. Chapter 7.02 ("Cable Television Systems") of the Rancho Cucamonga
Municipal Code is amended by adding a new Section 7.02.060 to read as follows:
§ 7.02.060. Special Provisions Applicable to Holders of State Video Franchises
A. Franchise Fee. A state video franchise holder operating in the City shall
pay to the City a franchise fee that is equal to five percent (5%) of the gross revenues of that state
video franchise holder. The term "gross revenue" shall be defined as set forth in Public Utilities
Code Section 5860.
B. Audit Authority. Not more than once annually, the City may examine and
perform an audit of the business records of a holder of a state video franchise to ensure
compliance with all applicable statutes and regulations related to the computation and payment
of franchise fees.
C. Customer Service Penalties Under State Video Franchises.
1. The holder of a state video franchise shall comply with all
applicable state and federal customer service and protection standazds pertaining to the provision
of video service.
11231-0104\942274v1.doc
P184
2. The City shall monitor a state video franchise holder's compliance
with state and federal customer service and protection standards. The City will provide to the
state video franchise holder written notice of any material breaches of applicable customer
service and protection standards, and will allow the state video franchise holder 30 days from
receipt of the notice to remedy the specified material breach. Material breaches not remedied
within the 30-day time period will be subject to the following monetary penalties to be imposed
by the City in accordance with state law:
a. For the first occurrence of a violation, a monetary penalty
of $500 shall be imposed for each day the violation remains in effect, not to exceed $1500 for
each violation.
b. For a second violation of the same nature within 12
months, a monetary penalty of $1000 shall be imposed for each day the violation remains in
effect, not to exceed $3000 for each violation.
c. For a third or further violation of the same nature within 12
months, a monetary penalty of $2500 shall be imposed for each day the violation remains in
effect, not to exceed $7,500 for each violation.
3. A state video franchise holder may appeal a monetary penalty
assessed by the City within 60 days. After relevant evidence and testimony is received, and staff
reports are submitted, the City Council wilt vote to either uphold or vacate the monetary penalty.
The City Council's decision on the imposition of a monetary penalty shall be final.
D. City Response to State Video Franchise Applications.
1. Applicants for state video franchises within the boundaries of the
City must concurrently provide to the City complete copies of any application or amendments to
applications filed with the California Public Utilities Commission. One complete copy must be
provided to the City Clerk.
2. The City will provide any appropriate comments to the Califomia
Public Utilities Commission regarding an application or an amendment to an application For a
state video franchise.
E. PEG Channel Capacity. A state video franchise holder that uses the public
rights-of--way shall designate sufficient capacity on its network to enable the carnage of at ]east
three public, educational, or governmental (PEG) access channels.
1. PEG access channels shall be for the exclusive use of the City or
its designees to provide public, educational, or governmental programming.
2. Advertising, underwriting, or sponsorship recognition may be
carried on the PEG access channels for the purpose of funding PEG-related activities.
3. The PEG access channels shall be carried on the basic service tier.
2
11231-0104\942294v1.doc
P185
4. To the extent feasible, the PEG access channels shall not be
separated numerically from other channels carried on the basic service tier, and the channel
numbers for the PEG access channels shall be the same channel numbers used by incumbent
cable operators unless prohibited by federal law.
5. Afrer the initial designation of PEG access channel numbers, the
channel numbers shall not be changed without the prior written consent of the City, unless the
change is required by federal law.
6. Each PEG access channel shall be capable of carrying a National
Television System Committee (NTSC) television signal.
F. Interconnection. Where technically feasible, a state video franchise holder
and an incumbent cable operator shall negotiate in good faith to interconnect their networks for
the purpose of providing PEG access channel programming. Interconnection may be
accomplished by direct cable, microwave link, satellite, or other reasonable method of
connection. State video franchise holders and incumbent cable operators shall provide
interconnection of the PEG access channels on reasonable terms and conditions and may not
withhold the interconnection. If a state video franchise holder and an incumbent cable operator
cannot reach a mutually acceptable interconnection agreement, the City may require the
incumbent cable operator to allow the state video franchise holder to interconnect its network
with the incumbent's network at a technically feasible point on the holder's network as identified
by the holder. If no technically-feasible point for interconnection is available, the state video
franchise holder shall make an interconnection available to the channel originator and shall
provide the facilities necessary for the interconnection. The cost of any interconnection shall be
borne by the state video franchise holder requesting the interconnection unless otherwise agreed
to by the parties.
G. Emergency Alert System And Emergency Overrides. A state video
franchise holder must comply with the Emergency Alert System requirements of the Federal
Communications Commission in order that emergency messages may be distributed over the
holder's network. Provisions in City-issued franchises authorizing the City to provide local
emergency notifications shall remain in effect, and shall apply to all state video franchise holders
in the City for the duration of the City-issued franchise, or until the term of the franchise would
have expired had it not been terminated pursuant to subdivision (m) of Section 5840 of the
California Public Utilities Code, or until January 1, ?009, whichever is later.
Section 3. The City Clerk is directed to certify to the passage and adoption of this
ordinance and to cause this ordinance to be posted or published as required by law.
3
11231-0104\942274v1.doc
P186
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this _ day of , 2007.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY ATTORNEY
4
11231-0104\942274v1.doc
P187
CURRENT RCMC-TITLE 7-CHAPTER 7.02
Title 7 TELECOMMUNICATIONS REGULATIONS
Chapter 7.02 CABLE TELEVISION SYSTEMS
7.02.010 Authority and findinos.
7.02.020 Franchise terms and conditions.
7.02.030 Franchise applications and renewal
7 02 040 Contents of cable television franchise agreements
7.02.010 Authority and findings.
A. In accordance with applicable federal and state law, the city is authorized to grant
one or more nonexclusive franchises to construct, reconstruct, operate, and
maintain cable television systems within the city limits.
B. The city council fnds that the development of cable television and related
telecommunications services may provide significant benefits for, and substantial
impacts upon, the residents of the city. Because of the complex and rapidly
changing technology associated with cable television, the city council further finds
that the public convenience, safety, and general welfare can best be served by
establishing regulatory powers to be exercised by the city. This chapter is intended
to specify the means for providing to the public the best possible cable television
and related telecommunications services, and every franchise issued in accordance
with this chapter is intended to achieve this primary objective. It is the further intent
of this chapter to adopt regulatory provisions that will enable the city to regulate
cable television and related telecommunications services to the maximum extent
authorized by federal and state law. (Ord. 599 § 2 (part), 1999)
7.02.020 Franchise terms and conditions.
A. Franchise purposes. A franchise granted by the city under the provisions
of this chapter may authorize the grantee to do the following:
1. To engage in the business of providing cable service and such other
telecommunications services as may be authorized by law and which grantee
elects to provide to its subscribers within the designated franchise service
area.
2. To erect, install, construct, repair, rebuild, reconstruct, replace, maintain,
and retain, cable lines, related electronic equipment, supporting structures,
appurtenances, and other property in connection with the operation of the
cable system in, on, over, under, upon, along and across streets or other
public places within the designated franchise service area.
3. To maintain and operate the franchise properties for the origination,
reception, transmission, amplification, and distribution of television and radio
signals, and for the delivery of cable services and such other services as
may be authorized by law.
B. Franchise Required. It is unlawful for any person to construct, install, or
operate a cable television system within any street or public way in the city
without f rst obtaining a franchise under the provisions of this chapter.
C. Term of the Franchise.
P188
CURRENT RCMC-TITLE 7-CHAPTER 7.02
1. A franchise granted under this chapter will be for the term specified in the
franchise agreement, commencing upon the effective date of the ordinance
or resolution adopted by the city council that authorizes the franchise.
2. A franchise granted under this chapter may be renewed upon application
by the grantee in accordance with the then-applicable provisions of state and
federal law and of this chapter.
D. Franchise Territory. A franchise is effective within the territorial limits of
the city, and within any area added to the city during the term of the
franchise, unless otherwise specified in the ordinance or resolution granting
the franchise or in the franchise agreement.
E. Federal or State Jurisdiction. This chapter will be construed in a manner
consistent with all applicable federal and state laws, and it applies to all
franchises granted or renewed after the effective date of this chapter, to the
extent authorized by applicable law.
F. Franchise Nontransferable.
t. Grantee may not sell, transfer, lease, assign, sublet, or dispose of, in
whole or in part, either by forced or involuntary sale, or by ordinary sale,
contract, consolidation, or otherwise, the franchise or any of the rights or
privileges therein granted, without the prior consent of the city council and
then only upon such terms and conditions as may be prescribed by the city
council, which consent may not be unreasonably denied or delayed. Any
attempt to sell, transfer, lease, assign, or otherwise dispose of the franchise
without the consent of the city council is null and void. The granting of a
security interest in any assets of the grantee, or any mortgage or other
hypothecation, will not be deemed a transfer for the purposes of this
subsection.
2. The requirements of subsection (F)(t) of this section apply to any change
in control of grantee. The word "control" as used herein is nol limited to the
ownership of major stockholder or partnership interests, but includes actual
working control in whatever manner exercised. If grantee is a corporation,
prior authorization of the city council is required where ownership or control
of more than twenty-five percent of the voting stock of grantee, or of
grantee's parent company, is acquired by a person or a group of persons
acting in concert, none of whom, singularly or collectively, owns or controls
the voting stock of the grantee, or of grantee's parent company, as of the
effective date of the franchise.
3. Grantee must notify the city in writing of any foreclosure or judicial sale of
all or a substantial part of the grantee's franchise property, or upon the
termination of any lease or other interest covering all or a substantial part of
that franchise property. That notification will be considered by the city as
notice that a change in control of ownership of the franchise has taken place,
and the provisions of this paragraph that require the prior consent of the city
council to that change in control of ownership will apply.
4. For the purpose of determining whether it will consent to an acquisition,
transfer, or change in control, the city may inquire as to the qualifications of
the prospective transferee or controlling party, and grantee must assist the
city in that inquiry. In seeking the city's consent to any change of ownership
or control, grantee or the proposed transferee, or both, must complete
Federal Communications Commission Form 394 or its equivalent. This
application must be submitted to the city not less than one hundred twenty
days prior to the proposed date of transfer. The transferee must establish
that it possesses the legal, financial, and technical capability to operate and
maintain the cable system and to comply with all franchise requirements
during the remaining term of the franchise. If the legal, financial, and
technical qualifications of the applicant are satisfactory, the city will consent
P189
CURRENT RCMC-TITLE 7-CHAPTER 7.02
to the transfer of the franchise. The consent of the city to that transfer will not
be unreasonably denied or delayed.
5. Any financial institution holding a pledge of the grantee's assets to secure
the advance of money for the construction or operation of the franchise
property has the right to notify the city that it, or a designee satisfactory to the
city, will take control of and operate the cable television system upon
grantee's default in its financial obligations. Further, that financial institution
must also submit a plan for such operation within ninety days after assuming
control. The plan must insure continued service and compliance with all
franchise requirements during the period that the fnancial institution will
exercise control over the system. The financial institution may not exercise
control over the system for a period exceeding eighteen months unless
authorized by the city, in its sole discretion, and during that period of time it
will have the right to petition the city to transfer the franchise to another
grantee.
6. Grantee must reimburse the city for the city's reasonable review and
processing expenses incurred in connection with any transfer or change in
control of the franchise. These expenses include, without limitation, costs of
administrative review, financial, legal, and technical evaluation of the
proposed transferee, consultants (including technical and legal experts and
all costs incurred by these experts), notice and publication costs, and
document preparation expenses. No reimbursement may be offset against
any franchise fee payable to the city during the term of the franchise.
G. Geographical Coverage.
1. Grantee must design, construct, and maintain the cable television system
so as to have the capability to pass every dwelling unit in the franchise
service area, subject to any service-area Line extension requirements or
territorial restrictions set forth in the franchise agreement.
2. After service has been established within all or any part of the franchise
service area by activating trunk or distribution cables, grantee must provide
service to any requesting subscriber within that activated part of the service
area within thirty days from the date of request, provided that the grantee is
able to secure on reasonable terms and conditions all rightsof-way
necessary to extend service to that subscriber within that thirty-day period.
H. Nonexclusive Franchise. Every franchise granted is nonexclusive. The city
specifically reserves the right to grant, at any time, such additional franchises
for a cable television system, or any component thereof, as it deems
appropriate, subject to applicable state and federal law. If an additional
franchise is proposed to be granted to a subsequent grantee, a noticed
public hearing must first be held in accordance with the provisions of
Government Code Section 53066.3.
I. Multiple Franchises.
1. The city may grant any number of franchises, subject to applicable state
and federal law. The city may limit the number of franchises granted, based
upon, but not necessarily limited to, the requirements of applicable law and
specific local considerations, such as:
a. The capacity of the public rights-of--way to accommodate multiple cables in
addition to the cables, conduits, and pipes of the existing utility systems,
such as electrical power, telephone, gas, and sewerage.
b. The benefits that may accrue to subscribers as a result of cable system
competition, such as lower rates and improved service.
c. The disadvantages that may result from cable system competition, such as
the requirement for multiple pedestals on residents' property, and the
disruption arising from numerous excavations within the public rights-of-way.
2. The city may require that any new grantee be responsible for its own
underground trenching and the associated costs if, in the city's opinion, the
P190
CURRENT RCMC TITLE 7-CHAPTER 7.02
rights-of-way in any particular area cannot reasonably accommodate
additional cables. (Ord. 599 § 2 (part), 1999)
7.02.030 Franchise applications and renewal.
A. Filing of Applications. Any person desiring an initial franchise for a
cable television system must file an application with the city. A
reasonable nonrefundable application fee in an amount established by
resolution of the city council must accompany the application. That
application fee will cover all costs associated with reviewing and
processing the application, including without limitation costs of
administrative review, f nancial, legal, and technical evaluation of the
applicant, consultants (including technical and legal experts and all
costs incurred by those experts), notice and publication requirements,
and document preparation expenses. If those costs exceed the
application fee, the applicant must pay the difference to the city within
thirty days following receipt of an itemized statement of those costs.
B. Applications-Contents. An application for an initial franchise for a
cable television system must contain, as applicable:
1. A statement as to the proposed franchise service area.
2. A resume of the applicant's prior history, including the experience
and expertise of the applicant in the cable television and
telecommunications industry.
3. A list of the partners, general and limited, of the applicant, if a
partnership, or the percentage of stock owned or controlled by each
stockholder, if a closely-held corporation. If the applicant is a publicly-
owned corporation, each owner of ten percent or more of the issued
and outstanding capital stock must be identified.
4. A list of officers, directors, and managing employees of the
applicant, together with a description of the background of each such
person.
5. The names and addresses of any parent or subsidiary of the
applicant, or any other business entity owning or controlling applicant
in whole or in part, or that is owned or controlled in whole or in part by
the applicant.
6. A current financial statement of the applicant verified by a certified
public accountant or otherwise certified, to be true, complete, and
correct to the reasonable satisfaction of the city.
7. The proposed construction and service schedule, the proposed rate
structure for cable services, and the proposed commitment to provide
public, educational, and governmental access capacity, services,
facilities, and equipment.
8. Any additional information that the city deems to be reasonably
necessary.
C. Consideration of Initial Applications.
1. Upon receipt of an application for an initial franchise, the city
manager or the city manager's designee must prepare a report and
make recommendations to the city council concerning that application.
2. A public hearing will be noticed prior to any initial franchise grant, at
a time and date approved by the city council. Within thirty days after
the close of the hearing, the city council will make a decision based
upon the evidence received at the hearing as to whether the franchise
should be granted, and, if granted, subject to what conditions. The city
council may grant one or more franchises, or may decline to grant any
franchise.
P191
CURRENT RCMC TITLE 7-CHAPTER 7.02
D. Franchise Renewal. Franchise renewals will be processed in
accordance with then-applicable law and with the renewal terms, if
any, of the franchise agreement. The city and grantee, by mutual
consent, may enter into renewal negotiations at any time during the
term of the franchise. (Ord. 599 § 2 (part), 1999)
7.02.040 Contents of cable television franchise
agreements.
A. The terms and provisions of a franchise agreement for the
operation of a cable television or related telecommunications
services may relate to or include, without limitation, the
fallowing subject matters:
1. The nature, scope, geographical area, and duration of the
franchise.
2. The applicable franchise fee to be paid to the city, including
the percentage amount, the method of computation, and the
time for payment.
3. Requirements relating to compliance with and
implementation of state and federal laws and regulations
pertaining to the operation of the cable television system.
4. Requirements relating to the construction, upgrade, or
rebuild of the cable television system, as well as the provision
of special services, such as outlets for public buildings,
emergency alert capability, and parental control devices.
5. Requirements relating to the maintenance of a performance
bond, a security fund, a letter of credit, or similar assurances to
secure the performance of the grantee's obligations under the
franchise agreement.
6. Requirements relating to comprehensive liability insurance,
workers' compensation insurance, and indemnification.
7. Requirements relating to consumer protection and customer
service standards, including the resolution of subscriber
complaints and disputes and the protection of subscribers'
privacy rights.
8. Requirements relating to the grantee's support of local cable
usage, including the provision of public, educational, and
governmental access channels, the coverage of public
meetings and special events, and financial support for
governmental access channels.
9. Requirements relating to construction, operation, and
maintenance of the cable television system within the public
rights-of-way, including compliance with all applicable building
codes and permit requirements of the city, the abandonment,
removal, or relocation of facilities, and compliance with FCC
technical standards.
10. Requirements relating to recordkeeping, accounting
procedures, reporting, periodic audits, and performance
reviews, and the inspection of grantee's books and records.
11. Acts or omissions constituting material breaches of or
defaults under the franchise agreement, and the applicable
penalties or remedies for such breaches or defaults, including
fines, penalties, liquidated damages, suspension, revocation,
and termination.
P192
CURRENT RCMC TITLE 7-CHAPTER 7.02
12. Requirements relating to the sale, assignment, or other
transfer or change in control of the franchise.
13. The grantee's obligation to maintain continuity of service
and to authorize, under certain specified circumstances, the
city's operation and management of the cable system.
14. Such additional requirements, conditions, policies, and
procedures as may be mutually agreed upon by the parties to
the franchise agreement and that will, in the judgment of city
staff and the city council, best serve the public interest and
protect the public health, welfare, and safety.
B. If there is any conflict or inconsistency between the
provisions of a franchise agreement authorized by the city
council and provisions of this chapter, the provisions of the
franchise agreement will control. (Ord. 599 § 2 (part), 1999)