HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001/02/14 - Agenda Packet
u
°T CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
- ' HISTORIC PRESERVATION
COMMISSION AGENDA
WEDNESDAY FEBRUARY 14, 2001 7:00 PM
Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center
Council Chamber
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, California
I. CALL TO ORDER
Pledge of Allegiance
Roll Call
Chairman McNiel _ Vice Chairman Maaas
Coin Mannerino _ Com Stewart _ Com Tolstoy
II. ANNOUNCEMENTS
III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
December 13, 2000
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS
The following dems are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voce
their opinion of the related protect Please wad to be recogn¢ed by the Chairman
and address the Commission by stating your name and address All such
opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each protect Please sign
in after speaking
A REVIEW OF HISTORIC SIGNIFICANCE OF PROPERTY LOCATED
AT 12150 6TH STREET -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - An
application to review a property for potential change of status on the
Historical Resource Survey listing - APN 229-283-23
V. PUBLIC COMMENTS
This ~s the time and place for the general public to address the commission Items
to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda
VI. COMMISSION BUSINESS
VII. ADJOURNMENT
1, Gatl Sanchez, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the
foregoing agenda was posted on February 8, 2001, at least 72 hours poor to the
meeting per Government Code Section 54964 2 at 10500 Civic Center Dnve,
Rancho Cucamonga
Page 2
Vicinity Map
Historic Preservation
Commission
February 14, 2001
Hillside
Banyar
19th/210
City of Rancho Cucamonga
~ CITY HALL
Wilson
"~ C C -. u i
.~ > Y
ca _
;' _ ~ ~
Q
T H E C I T Y O F
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Staff Report
DATE. February 14, 2001
TO Chairman and Members of the Historic Preservation Commission
FROM• Brad Buller, Clty Planner
BY Emily Wime, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT REVIEW OF HISTORIC SIGNIFICANCE OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT 12150
6TH STREET -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - An application to review a
property for potential change of status on the Historical Resource Survey listing -
APN 1061-571-01
• BACKGROUND
A A request was made by Paragon Development Corporation for review of the historical
significance of the buildings located at 12150 Sixth Street in connection with potential
demolition Staff explained to the applicant that the property was listed on the Historical
Resource Survey. In order to release the property from the survey list, the Historical
Preservation Commission must review the property for any significant findings.
B Historical Significance The land and structures located at 12150 6th Street, known historically
as "Cucamonga Winery" represent early examples of the wine industry.
The property was owned by Joe Camponella in 1932, Mary Camponella from 1933 to 1941,
and the Cucamonga W finery from 1941 through 1948 The four main structures are described
in the Historic Resources Inventory preformed on the property Structure Number 1 is
described as a rectangular shaped structure with a hip roof and exterior stucco siding
Structure Number 2 is a rectangular shaped structure that appears to have been a residence
at one time It is single story with a front gable roof and a hipped shed on the front The
windows are aluminum and the door is wood with an aluminum window Structure Number 3
is the main structure with two additions to the east side The structure has a side gable roof
and the roof is a side gable cupola There is a second lower building to the east The
construction is wood clapboard, the root side is gabled and the windows are boarded A shed
extension is located over the front door The last addition is also rectangular and has a flat
type roof This appears to be the winery building The final structure is of recent construction,
possibly associated with Borg Manufacturing
• ITEM A
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION 01-01 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
February 14, 2001
Page 2
The only historically significant artifact addressed m the last analysis (1990) was the single
lane wood bridge with the concrete abutments and wood guardrails that appeared to have
been bwlt in the late 1930's W ith the subsequent improvements completed by CalTrans near
the I-15 freeway, no portion of the bridge remains
C Site Characteristics The site is comprised of seven structures, including the additions It is
surrounded by the General Industrial District, Subarea 4 Surrounding uses include vacant
fields to the north, east, and south and one industrial building to the west. Vegetation on the
site includes small shrubs and one Califorrna pepper tree at the south entrance
D Landmark Designation Based on the City's criteria of the Historic Preservation Ordinance,
including such significant areas as, historical, cultural, architectural, and neighborhood
geographic setting; the property is not considered historic Because of the alterations on the
property, and the present use of the property as a manufacturing facility, staff's analysis of the
site is that it does not represent a good example of the local wine industry The Padre W finery
and the Cucamonga Pioneer Winery are better examples of winery operations that have
maintained their historical character over the years
Findings
• There are no facts to support findings for consideration of the property or structures of .
historical or cultural significance•
• The condition of the property and structures are not particularly representative of a
historical period, type, style, region, or way of life
• The structures are simple, utilitarian, industrial type structures, and are not a good
example of a type of building, which was once common, but now rare
• The structures were built between 1936 and 1970, therefore, the proposed landmark is
not of greater age than most of its kind
• The site was used for wine production for only 12 years and should not be considered
historical.
• The proposed landmark is not connected with someone renowned or important or a local
personality
• The proposed landmark is not connected with a business or use, which was once
common but is now rare
E Environmental Assessment. The prolect is categorically exempt under Class 1 d of the
gwdelines for the California Environmental Quality Act
CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily
Bulletin newspaper, and notices were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the protect site •
~'1-~
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION 01-01 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
• February 14, 2001
Page 3
RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Historc Preservation Commission find thatthere
are no significant attributes to the property, therefore, the property would not be eligible for Historic
Landmark Designation The Commission should direct staff to modify the Histoncal Resources
Survey listing to show a Survey Determined Insignificant level and allow demolition to proceed.
Respectfully submitted
Brad Buller
City Planner
BB EW\Is
Attachments Exhibit "A" -Photographs of Main structures
Exhibit "B" -Photo of Newly installed bridge and surrounding property
Exhibit "C" -Site Plan
Exhibit "D" -Historic Resources Inventory - 1990
u
C_~
Structure 3 -Main structure with two additions to the side Picture shows south side
~Xhibi-~' ~.pr~ ~~
Structure 1 -Early residential structure, currently abandoned Northeast side of building
i
Newly installed bridge No significant historical significance Northeast orientation
Surrounding uses Vacant fields faang the north, east, and south sides Rear portion of prop-
erty includes warehousing
~~ // ~ t~
~xh~bi~+ g
~s(o. t-d y r........ ..._. _~ -~ _
e~--m
-z
v ~ - 6 (`A~rI LU _
cUNL 2ET>11+6 W{}aG
,
~(MMM{[KNILEswCO i
i .. ~ ~ >
1'
~ an vnv{v G,
i
~
, ~. ~
VK
'a{• •N
• •
•e
NP
ic-l0.{
T}•LK'
U _
u~ ^
n;o,sgy{ya` 6 C. .
'
• i _
al' sreceKC p~
= r -.
"
i
r
'
' _ ~y
ryWMk n
~
~
~ r
D D
{{
~ ..
~ t
T V I ~
' ~
i ~
ep• p• t IYW )o•e•1
1
•~ YOGI -
••~ I
t2 I
.1 L_
r i
` -
_
- i
_ ~
}~~[L(•
' I
1
-.,
r _
y P
_ M_ ,
r O_
_
/ ire
( I
~ -5'52 ^G<` I
a/a one. -
I`
atlrlE ~1{(E
YP'i .~ YPt 1
-Sre 6c
TZaCK • f V~„~y {
f l0/•2,^CI UKML.^6
~c
GS~C• ~ n fuu^6 l
3G J: • { 1
•c• f r
-aeca o•---• am~wus
{{I.J{II ,~ ~ s
'q 1,"{' '
y.~ -h~ 4
PµRwG ;eE, 8 STN~f ~. • \ - u•-o• r[G o., r
u E•E~ oKKE 1 6'°`w
OP4KINQ * b0. IG+(~MT ~MPLetfrc2
~ h~
/2/~ 6nt Srn~r-
, ~ --- N cc{.9,~ --
L \ECEr
~Xh~~j~~ PLOT 1~ L AN,
_ SCPGE 1^ r )p.
' 1~
1~ t 1
~'H
' ,
1
Y c•pm~ G(o(
.p ~_
~- -
i
.r
Y
PC
State of California The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
OFFICE OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION
• HISTORIC RESOURCES INVEN70RY
IDENTIFICATION AND LOCATiDN
1. Historic Nana: Cucamonga Ntnery
2. Common or Lurrent Name• Borg Manufacturing
3. Number 8 Street: 12150 6th Street
City: Rancho Cucamonga Vicinity Only 2t p.
4. Ouad Map No:. UTM Z A: B.
S. Parcel No: 0229-283-23 Other:
Ser. No.
National Regi stet Status:
Local Designation:
County (3-Letter Designator).
C: D:
DESCRIPTION
b. Property Category: If District, Number of Documented Resources:
7. Bn efly descn be the present physical appearance of the property, including condoian, bourxfa n es,
surroundings, end (if appropriate) erchttecturel style:
This wit be a group of structures. STRUCTURE NUMBER 1 will be a small rectangular shaped structure with hip roof. Siding
will be stucco. Windows appear to be wood and have been enclosed to pl estic. Door is centrally located on the north side.
STRUCTURE NUMBER 2 will be a rectangular shaped structure that appears to have been a residential structure at one time. It
is stogie story with front gable roof and a hipped shed on the front. Ytndows are atuminun. The door is wood with an
aluninun window. STRUCTURE NUMBER 3 will be a main structure with 2 additt ons to the east side. This structure will have a
side gable roof. Siding will be board and batten. Located centrally on the roof of this structure writ 6e side gable
cupola there is a second lower building inmediately to the east. It appears to be of wood clapboard construction Roof
is side gable. NiMows have been boarded. A shed extension is located over the front door. Tht rd structure appears to be
either concrete or corrugated iron and a flat type roof. STRUCTURE NUMBER 4 will be a concrete block structure with a
hipped roof 8 immediately to the west a gable type roof. This appears to have been a winery but ld tog. There are grouping
of windows along the upper portion of the structure, 8 a large warehouse door on the southside. STRUCTURE 5 is of recent
construction.
8. Alterations 8 Date:
9. Related Features on Property.
10. Planning Agency:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
11. Owner 8 Address:
Borg Manufacturing
POB 2789-5 Daco Dr.
Cookeville„ TN 38502
12. Type of Ownership:
Prt vote
13. Present Use:Narehouse
14. Zoning: General industrial
15. Threats: URMB/RDA
~xh~bi+'~D„ ~7
HISTORICAL INFORMATION
16. Constuc[ion Date(s): 1935-1940 Original Locattan: Yes Dale Moved
17. Architect: Unknown Budder: Unknown •
18. Historic Attributes (with Number from List):
SIGNIFICANCE AND EVALUATION
19. Context for Evaluation: Theme: Area:
Pert od: Property Type: Context formally developed7:
20. Brief ly discuss the property's importance within the context Use historical and architectural analysts as
appropriate. Conpare with st mtlar proper[i es.
This is a grouping of several structures that appear to have been built between 1936 and the 1970s. The earliest
buildings include Structures 1, 3 and 4. Structure 1 is an early residential structure. Stuctures 3 and 4 appear to be
buildings closely associated with the winery. The property was owned by Jce Canpanella in 1932, Mary Caiiipanella from 1933
to 1941, and the Cucamonga winery from 1941 through 1948. The site does not represent a good exaiiple of the wine industry,
since the buildings have been modified and expanded over the years. Other exaitples of the wine Indust ry have survived and
have retained their integrity touch better then this site. Of historical significance, however, is the entrance to the
property. There is a single lane, wood bridge with concrete abutments and wood guardrails that appears to have been built
in the late 1y30s and has retained its integrity.
21. Sources: San Bernardino County Assessor Lot Books
22. Applicebte National Register Cn ten a:
23. Other recognition:
State LanoYnark Number:
24. Evaluator: Lynn Nerrtll
Year of Evaluation: 1990
25. Survey Type: S (C=Comprehensive,
P=Pro)ect Related, S=Single Property
26. Survey Name: Rancho Cucamonga Update/URN Assessment
27. Year Form Prepared: 1990
By (Name). Lynn Nerrtll
Organttatton: Nanageinent Sciences Applications, loc.
Address: 123 East Ninth Street, Suite 204
City, State 2i p: Upland, Caliform a, 91786
Phone: (714) 981-0894
Sketch map. Show location and boundaries of
property in relation to nearby streets, railways,
natural laridiiarks, etc. Name each feature.
`.J
J D
bQOcs
E~h~ 6~~ '' o "'