Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001/07/25 - Agenda Packet C1 ~, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~- PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA WEDNESDAY JULY 25, 2001 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chamber 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call Chairman McNiel _ Vice Chairman Macias Coin Mannerino _ Com Stewart _ Com Tolstoy II. ANNOUNCEMENTS III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES June 27, 2001 Adjourned Meeting of June 27, 2001 July 11, 2001 IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voce their opinion of the related project Please wart to be recogn¢ed by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address All such opinions shall be l~mrted to 5 minutes per ind~v~dual for each pro/ect Please sign in after speaking A ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16195 - COLORADO PACIFIC COMMUNITIES - A residential subdmsion of 139 single-family lots on 45 28 acres in the Very Low Residential District (up to 2 dwelling units per acre) and 13 25 acres of open space in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), utilizing the Optional Development Standards of the Etiwanda Specific Plan All residential development is proposed on the 45 28-acre parcel located on the south side of Highland Avenue, east of Etiwanda Avenue and all the required open space (per the Optional Development Standards) is proposed on the 13 25-acre parcel located on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue, south of Victoria Street - APN 227-051-01, 04, 05, 06, 09 and 28 and 227-121-16 and 49 Related Files Development Agreement DRC2001-00325, Etiwanda Speafic Plan Amendment 01-01, Tree Removal Permit DRC2001-00323, Landmark Designation DRC2001-00337, and Landmark Alteration Permit DRC2001-00338. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration (Continued from July 11, 2001) B ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2001-00325 - COLORADO PACIFIC COMMUNITIES - A proposed development agreement to establish the details pertaining to the transfer of density and open space between Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16195 and the open space parcel - APN 227-051-01, 04, 05, 06, 09, and 28 and 227-121-16 and 49 Related Files Tentative Tract SUBTT16195, Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment 01-01, Tree Removal Permit DRC2001- 00323, Landmark Designation DRC2001-00337, and Landmark Alteration Permit DRC2001-00338 Staff has prepared a Negatroe Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration (Continued from July 11, 2001) C ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 01-01 -COLORADO PACIFIC COMMUNITIES - A request to amend to the Etiwanda Specific Pian to allow the transfer of density and/or open space to non-contiguous parcels when using the Optional Development Standards (Figure 5-3) Related Files Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16195, Development Agreement DRC2001-00325, Tree Removal Permit DRC2001-00323, Landmark Designation DRC2001-00337, and Landmark Alteration Permit DRC2001-00338. (Continued from July 11, 2001) D GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-07 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -The City of Rancho Cucamonga has completed the Draft City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update The Protect Planning Area encompasses the existing City (approximately 24,000 acres) as well as its sphere-of-influence (approximately 7,700 acres) that is located north of the City This update includes changes in land use designations as well as updates to the policies and programs within the City's General Plan The proposed General Plan includes the reduction of approximately 182 acres of residential uses and an increase of 182 acres in non-residential uses Within the existing City limits, non-residential acreage is reduced by 18 acres and residential acreage is increased by 18 acres Within the sphere-of-influence, the change is a reduction of 200 acres in residential uses, and an increase of 200 acres in non-residential uses With the implementation of the proposed General Plan, the following additional (i e , future) development would occur with bwldout approximately 13,524 dwelling units, approximately 9,460,680 square feet of commercial, approximately 52,811,591 square feet of industrial, no additional public/quasi-public uses, and approximately 231 acres of arterials/freeways The Protect/Planning Area includes all of the land area within the boundaries of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and its sphere-of-influence area located directly • • n U Page 2 to the north The City is located in the southwest corner of San Bernardino County, 13 miles west of downtown San Bernardino The San Gabriel Mountains are located to the north, and the communities of Upland, Ontario, and Fontana surround the City to the west, south and east, respectively Total acreage within City boundaries is approximately 24,000 acres Total acreage within the sphere-of-influence is approximately 7,700 acres Total protect/planning area comprises approximately 31,700 acres This action will be fonr/arded to the City Council for final action and the date of the Public Hearing before City Council will be separately noticed A Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) has been prepared for this Protect and is available for public revew and written comment The public review period for the DEIR has a duration of 45 days beginning on June 22, 2001 and ending on August 6, 2001 The Final EIR (including the Response to Comments) will be reviewed at a subsequently advertised public hearing V. NEW BUSINESS C~ E DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00231 - HOGLE-IRELAND, INC -The review of detailed site plan and budding elevations for McDonald's Restaurant on 1 44-acre of land within the previously approved Terra Vista Commons Master Plan in the Mixed Use (MFC) District of the Terra Vista Community Plan, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard west of Milliken Avenue - APN 107-421-98 and 227-771-53 Related File Conditional Use Permit 99-25 VI. PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the hme and place for the general public to address the commission Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda VII. COMMISSION BUSINESS TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS VIII. ADJOURNMENT • The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11 00 p m adjournment hme If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission 1, Gail Sanchez, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on July 19, 2001, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964 2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga Page 3 Vicinity Map Planning Commission July 25, 2001 Hillside Banya 19th/210 E Fc D is Clty-wide ilson ;~~ City of Rancho Cucamonga ~ CITY HALL 'o c c ~ z~~ ~ j Y ~ L ~ = In JULY 25, 2001 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA INDEX ITEM NO. ITEM TITLE PAGES Agenda 2 - 5 A - C Tentatroe Tract Map SUBTT16195 Development Agreement DRC2001-00325 Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment 01-01 6 D General Plan Amendment 99-07 7 - 13 E Development Review DRC2001-00231 14 - 36 F Trails Advisory Committee Appointments 37 RECEIVED 7-1N 1, 12 59PM, BUN NtlL tl/O/ ~> M wuwxunuq Lux utv, •~ O7/1&/B2 15:48 FAb OB8 982 BT87 &kLL & FOREIFM~i ~ Hall & Foreman, irl~. ~ Cml t:ngmeenrg Planning Surverrg Public Walls 7uly 19, 2001 Ms. Gait Sanchez Plamring Commission Deputy City otRancdo Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Re: Tentative Tract 16195 • • Dear Ms Sanchez• Q 091 Job No. 01197-000 Colorado Pacific Communities rs withlirawutg its cumnt pending application for Tentative Tract 16195, and related landmark alteration, Development Agrcement, and Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment apphcations We intend to resubmit new applications es Boon as possible. Thank you for your assistance and ceoperetion Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Hall & Foreman, Int. P He (Authorized Agent) Protect Manager cc• Debra Meier, Crty of Rancho Cucamonga, P1amling DannyBrose, Colorado Pacific John Hogan, HFI 11H8eoIp?1lJplead ProJcets101.1971AdmtalC.etteslGrv oraantlto me 1152 North Mounlam Avenue Smk 100 n Upland, Caldonda 9t78a~889 / / /J /' Te19D91992-7777 /7 /3 (~' Fax 90&982767 / / 40 2/eav~e o-~ .aedicatPd SeKtvice 1967-2001 T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO CUCAMONGA Sld1L 1~:~1 L DATE July 25, 2001 7CT. Chair and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, Clty Planner BY Larry Henderson AICP, Principal Planner SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-07 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - The Clty of Rancho Cucamonga has completed the Draft Clty of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update. The Protect Planning Area encompasses the existing Clty (approximately 24,000 acres) as well as its sphere-of-Influence (approximately 7,700 acres) that is located north of the City. This update includes changes in land use designations as well as updates to the policies and programs within the City's General Plan. The proposed General Plan includes • the reduction of approximately 182 acres of residential uses and an increase of 182 acres ninon-residential uses. Within the existing City limits, non-residential acreage is reduced by 18 acres and residential acreage is increased by 18 acres. Within the sphere-of-influence, the change is a reduction of 200 acres in residential uses, and an increase of 200 acres in non-residential uses. With the implementation of the proposed General Plan, the following additional (i e., future) development would occur with buildout: approximately 13,524 dwelling units, approximately 9,460,680 square feet of commercial, approximately 52,811,591 square feet of industrial, no additional public/quasi-public uses, and approximately 231 acres of arterials/freeways The Prolect/Planning Area includes all of the land area within the boundaries of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and its sphere-of-influence area located directly to the north. The City is located in the southwest corner of San Bernardino County, 13 miles west of downtown San Bernardino The San Gabriel Mountains are located to the north, and the communities of Upland, Ontario, and Fontana surround the City to the west, south and east, respectively. Total acreage within City boundaries is approximately 24,000 acres. Total acreage within the sphere-of-influence is approximately 7,700 acres Total pro~ecUplanning area comprises approximately 31,700 acres. This action will be forwarded to the City Council for final action and the date of the Public Hearing before City Council will be separately noticed. A Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) has been prepared for this Protect and is available for public review and written comment. The public review period for the DEIR has a duration of 45 days beginning on June 22, 2001 and ending on August 6, 2001. The Final EIR (including the Response to Comments) will be . reviewed at a subsequently advertised public heanng. ITEM D PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 99-07 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA July 25, 2001 Page 2 BACKGROUND: General Plan Task Force Action On July 2, 2001 the General Plan Task Force reviewed these documents and unanimously recommended they be fonwarded for consideration by the Planning Commission and City Council. Draft EIR The Draft EIR is intended to serve as an informational document for public agency deasion-makers and the general public regarding the objectives and components of the proposed project This document addresses the potentially significant adverse environmental impacts that may be assoaated with buildout of the proposed General Plan, as well as, identrfy feasible mitigation measures and alternatives that may be adopted to reduce or eliminate these impacts. This EIR is the primary reference document for the formulation and implementation of amitigation-monitoring program for the proposed General Plan. The intent of this EIR is to provide a Program EIR that evaluates the broad-scale impacts of the General Plan A Program EIR is considered a °first-tier" document (California CEQA guidelines, Section 15152). °Second-tier" documents, such as Project EIRs, Focused EIRs, or Mitigated Negative Declarations, typically follow and evaluate the impacts of a single activity undertaken to implement the plan. The Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the General Plan Update was released for the 45-day review on June 22, 2001 and will end on August 6, 2001 The EIR and General Plan Task Force staff report was forwarded to the Planning Commission and City Councl Members on June 28, 2001. The Planning Commission is encouraged to provide any comments. Draft General Plan Uodate The proposed project is the update of the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The Planning Area encompasses the existing City (approximately 24,000 acres), as well as its sphere-of- influence (approximately 7,700 acres) that is located north of the City. This update includes changes in land use designations as well as updates to the policies and programs within the City's General Plan. No substantial changes in the existing land use designations are included in the proposed update. The proposed General Plan includes the reduction of approximately 182 acres of residential uses and an increase of 182 acres in non-residential uses Within the existing City limits, non-residential acreage is reduced by 18 acres and residential acreage is increased by 18 acres. Within the sphere-of-influence, the change is a reduction of 200 acres in residential uses, and an increase of 200 acres innon-residential uses. The change in land uses is attributable to a number of things: new gwdance for Mixed Use areas and technical refinements to the Plan to reflect exiting or proposed development. Wrth the implementation of the proposed General Plan, the following additional (i e., future) development would occur with build-out: approximately 13,524 dwelling units; approximately 9,460,680 square feet of commeraal; approximately 52,811,591 square feet of industrial; no additional public/quasi- public uses, and approximately 231 acres of artenals/freeways. • • C~ ~a PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 99-07 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA July 25, 2001 Page 3 The singular goal and purpose of the General Plan is to present the Rancho Cucamonga Vision (described further in Chapter II) and groe guidance to its implementation. The Plan accomplishes this through a series of policies and implementation actions or programs related to more speafic issues that are important. These policies, in turn, are applied to both public and private development protects and decisions. Where the City does not have development authority, as in the unincorporated area or regarding certain functions handled by another unit of government, the General Plan seeks to influence the appropriate deesion making bodies so that their deasions reinforce our City's Vision. The General Plan is, in effect, the °Constitution° for development in the community. Consequently, it is imperative that it be used as the basic frame of reference in making development and conservation decisions within the planning area, whether they involve public or private lands. All pollees within our Plan are important or they would not be included. They are to be applied when the following kinds of decisions are contemplated• • Budget allocations that impact the physical development in our plamm~g area; • Review of proposed private development protects; • Revew of proposed public protects, including acgwsition or disposal of public lands; • Proposals by other levels of government that would affect our community's interests; • Position taking on proposed legislation affecting our community's interests; • Position taking regarding regional planning actiwties affecting our community's interests; and • Proposed programs or actions to implement our General Plan in addition to those described above. Policy is expressed in this Plan in both mapped and written form. The maps depict the geographic application of policy and express the desired pattern of development and conservation that define our community Written policy expresses decision-making gwdance related to what is depicted on the maps or, if the subtect is not mapped, as a gwde to certain decision points defined by the policy. Additional diagrams and illustrations are included to further assist in interpretation of policy and application to specific situations. Occasionally, users of the General Plan may want additional information regarding the background and reasoning behind policies in the Plan. Referring to the Appendices or, in some cases, to the General Plan EIR, can satisfy these needs. The Draft General Plan Update represents the complete elements that were previously reviewed at separate times by staff and the General Plan Task Force. This Draft has incorporated the changes previously requested. Future modifications will be reserved until the end of the public hearing process. ~D 3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 99-07 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA July 25, 2001 Page 4 The Draft General Plan and General Plan Task Force staff report was forwarded to the Planrnng Commission and City Council Members on June 28, 2001. The Planning Commission is encouraged to provide any comments. ANALYSIS: This update of the General Plan is very thorough and because of certain technical advances, such as the use of Geographic Information System (GIS) technology for the preparation of maps and storage and retrieval of information, the Cdy realizes a greater benefit than from the last update This is sigrnficent because one of the advantages we now have is the ability to manage and maintain General Plan information much more readily than in the past. In effect, the General Plan in its current form is a powerful resource and land management device that will contribute to the City government's effiaency and effectiveness in making and cerying out development deGSions It is interesting to note that the amount of land use change reflected in this version of the Plan relative to earlier versions is surprisingly slight. This speaks to two things: 1) previous land use policy direction has proven to be sound, and 2) many aspects of community development now requiring attention have more to do with sustaining the quality of development than shaping changes in what land use patterns are desired. r 1 U Additional information relative to the General Plan Update is contained in the attached letter from AI Bell of 'The Planning Center," Project Consultant Mr Bell will be making a presentation at the public hearing . RECOMMENDATION Rewew and comment as needed after public comment is considered. A second hearing will be needed on the Response to Comments for the Final EIR at the September 12, 2001 meeting Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB LH mlg Attachment: Letter from AI Bell r 1 L. J ~',, THE ~~ CENTER G 1~ Governmental Setvrcer Planning fr Urban Detrgn Environmental StudJer f~tndreape Arehttectare July 16, 2001 1580 Metro Dmre Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Mr Larry McNlel, Chalrman Planning Commission Fnorre il4ssss2zo City of Rancho Cucamonga Fax 714 9689221 10$Up CNIC Center DfIVe Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 costamesaQplanmrigcentercom Subfect Ranch Cucamonga General Plan Update Dear Chalrman McNlel Our collaboration with the Clty on the update of your General Plan has highlighted certain attributes of the draft document now scheduled for public hearings We would Ilke to focus on several of them that merit special comment These observations are derived, not only from the specific work on this Plan, but on our experience elsewhere with numerous general plan protects We believe these attributes of your updated General Plan, taken together, place the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the forefront of cities that are dedicated to quality community planning This is entirely consistent with the exceptional planning heritage that characterizes Rancho Cucamonga It Is our observation that the process we are now completing equips your City with a contemporary policy document commensurate with the high expectations of your opinion leaders and their constituencies VISION Most General Plans In Calrfornia have no clear vision statement to unify the plan and provide an oversight regarding the qualities and characteristics that matter to the community Thls Plan now expresses a vision that received considerable Input from the General Plan Technical (Staff) Advisory Team and the General Plan Task Force Qoint Council/Commission). It was used as the basis for policy direction In each of the policy chapters In the updated Plan. COMPERHENSIVE SCOPE The mandated scope of general plans as provided for In the California Government Code Is seriously in need of improvement, rf not complete overhaul You have addressed that deficiency In two ways 1) by organizing the Plan In coherent "super-chapters" that guide fundamental aspects of the City's development, and 2) by Incorporating the critical Ingredients of public facilities and services, community design and economic development In our opinion, these topics should be mandated because of their powerful influence In helping communities prosper LAND USE FOCUS A relatively small portion of the City's land area has been recommended for land use change In fact, selected areas for muted-use development constitute more of a re-focusing and clarification than outright change The significance of this Is that 1) the City now has increased policy leverage to stimulate and guide the desired kind of development in these key remaining areas of the City, and 2) the overall Impact Is not to Increase development levels but, rather, to shrft and focus development activity more effectively. POLICY INTENT Three measures have been taken In the Plan to reinforce clarity of the Plan's policies. The first Is to define the strength of policy Intent by defining action terminology and using that terminology consistently For example, shall and should have specific meanings In terms of the policy P \CreO1 OGgtlmm\MmAnp lanx tloc ~~ July 16, 2001 Page 2 outcome to be expected The second measure is accompanying each policy wdh a discussion • paragraph that helps the reader understand in more depth the context and purpose for establishing the policy The third feature involved an extra effort to show connectivity between topical \ssues and related General Plan policies While this added to the length of the text and may appear repetdive in some cases, this linkage was considered useful to provide Clardy and rationale for policy dvection contained in the Plan INTERNAL SIMPLIFICATION As a result of technical studies, interdepartmental coordination and thorough review, previous ambigwt\es in policy direction have been clarfied. This was particularly valuable in the area of arterial highway intent and standards, where the intent of the previous General Plan was subject to varied interpretations An aspect of this issue that highlights the value of an update process such as this one \s the situation regarding the proposed improvements to the Baseline/I-15 connection The General Plan traffic analysis by RKJK Assoaates (now Urban Crossroads) helped bang about a better and more cost effective solution to a current project that was in process for the I-15 and Base Ltne Road Interchange In addd\on, important updates in the area of parks and recreation, community design and public facildies/services (especially library, fire and police services) were also accomplished READABILITY Considerable effort was expended in making the already solid general plan even more user friendly and readable Most general plans are wntten in a bureaucratic "voice" which, in seeking to appear neutral, also generally comes across as being uninspired and aloof The Plan \s now wntten so that the reader gets the impression that th\s document \s speaking on behalf of the people of the community It \s more conversational and less intimidating Substantive content remains as complete as with more traditional styles TECHNICAL IMPROVEMENTS The C\ty had already made s\gnrf\cant strides in establishing its Geographic Information System by the time this update began However, the need to complete numerous improvements in certain features of General Plan mapping emerged as the planning process evolved As a consequence, the City now has a set of General Plan exh\bds of considerably improved accuracy and quality These improvements significantly enhance the utility of the General Plan They are accompanied by statistical data that more accurately represent the Plan's intent. SPECIALIZED STUDIES This update was accompanied and supported by specialized studies that went well beyond the level of effort normally associated wdh general plan updates Because of their detail and some of the issues they raised, some of these studies complicated and extended the update process. Nevertheless, the City now has an updated Fire District Strategic Plan, a Police Services Plan, an updated Library Master Plan (and phased implementation strategy), and a contemporary Park and Recreation Needs Assessment Each of these contributed to refined policy content in the updated General Plan in addition to their inherent operational management value REVIEW THOROUGHNESS The draft materials that now constitute the updated General Plan received thorough policy review by the General Plan Task Force, as well as screening by an eMensive interdepartmental review coordinated by the Planning Department In our experience elsewhere, this level of review is seldom achieved As a consequence, we believe this document is highly internally consistent as well as being responsive to the policy and technical needs of the City MANAGEMENT TOOL From the very beginning of the process, we had a mutual objective of making the General Plan as useful as possible as a management tool for the City once the updated version was adopted Most of the features described above contribute to this characteristic One that has not been mentioned is the Implementation Action Plan, an appendix to the Plan that suggests an initial set of actions that will begin (or continue) implementation of every policy in the Plan The intent is that this • action matrix be updated periodically in conjunction wdh the annual budgeting cycle to sustain the City's commdment to implementing the General Plan Incidentally, this tool would also facildate preparation of the legally regwred (but seldom produced by most jurisdictions) Annual Implementation Report called P \Cre-01 OGydminWee,bp Letlx tloc ~ ] /1 July 16, 2001 Page 3 for in the California Government Code The key point, however, is that the General Plan is designed specifically as an implementable policy document that will continue to serve the community well until d is next updated. Part of the management tool aspect of this Plan is the fact that both policy and technical updates can be much more readily accomplished than in the past-and at considerably less cost than a mator overhaul. This is a consequence of the technical improvements, documentation, and integration wdh the City's computer systems that have been accomplished as part of this process For a variety of unantiapated reasons, the update process became more labor intensNe and time consuming than any of us anticipated A signrficant part of this relates to the unusually thorough special studies that accompanied the Plan preparation However, d is our tudgment that the net result is a document that will continue to serve the community well and that reflects the quality image that the City of Rancho Cucamonga has achieved since ds incorporation It has been our privilege to collaborate wdh the City in this demanding process We look forward to tointly completing the public hearing process Please advise us rf there is anything else we can do to faalitate successful completion of this update effort Sincerely, TH~ NNING `Co-E~N'~TERD AI Bell ~• (j~ G Karen Gulee y Protect Co-manager Protect Co-Manager Cc Brad Buller Dick Rameila P\GaOI OC+WmmWeen^61eaa Da T H E C I T Y O F RANCtIO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE. July 25, 2001 TO. Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM. Brad Buller, Clty Planner BY• Debra Meier, AICP, Contract Planner SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00231 -HOGLE-IRELAND, INC -The review of detailed site plan and building elevations for McDonald's Restaurant on 1.44 acres of land within the previously approved Terra Vista Commons Master Plan in the Mixed Use (MFC) District of the Terra Vista Community Plan, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, west of Milliken Avenue - APN. 107-421-98 and 227-771-53 Related Flle Conditional Use Permit 99-25. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Surrounding Land Use and Zoning North - Undeveloped portion of the Terra Vista Commons Master Plan/Mixed Use South - Undeveloped land/Industrial Park (Subarea 7) East - Undeveloped portion of the Terra Vista Commons Master Plan West - Retail building (Pad E) of the Terra Vista Commons Master Plan/Mixed Use B General Plan Designations Protect Site -Commercial North - Commercial South - Industrial Park East - Commercial West - Commercial C. Site Characteristics The Terra Vista Commons Master, Plan (Conditional Use Permit 99-25) was approved by the Commission on January 12, 2000 The Commons is amixed-use master plan that will eventually include a combination of financial, retail, restaurants, a service station, and high density residential The Master Plan approval included the Conceptual Site Plan and Design Guidelines, the design review approval of Pad E (now constructed) and the conceptual approval of Pad D as a fast food drive-thru restaurant (proposed McDonald's) ITEM E PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC 2001-00231 - HOGLE-IRELAND, INC July 25, 2001 Page 2 D. Parkins Calculations• Type Square of Use Footage Fast Food Restaurant 4,387 ANALYSIS Number of Parking Spaces Ratio Required 1/75 s f. 59 Number of Spaces Provided 67 A. General. The proposed budding elevations reflect the details, materials, and color palette established by the Master Plan Design Gwdelines as well as other retail bwldmgs that have been completed within The Commons B Design Review Committee• The Design Review Committee (McNeil, Stewart, and Henderson) reviewed the protect on June 19, 2001 (Exhibit "D"). The Committee recommended approval subtect to the modifications and conditions as noted below and included m the attached Resolution 1. A 3-foot high decorative screen wall shall be incorporated along the south and east dges of the drive-thru lane The screen wall is necessary to properly screen the drive-thru activity from Foothill Boulevard The wall shall include a decorative cap that is coordinated with the budding design 2 Provide pedestrian access from the sidewalk on Foothill Boulevard to the restaurant. The access shall be provided in the location that would resemble the shortest path from the sidewalk that pedestrians would be likely to take, m order to avoid trails through the landscaping 3 Vines shall be planted at the base of all trellis support columns, including the outdoor eating area and the drive-thru lanes, m order to provide a greater degree of shade as the vine matures onto the trellis. 4 The applicant shall coordinate with the site developer and complete all necessary landscaping along Foothill Boulevard 5 The eaves shall extend beyond the bwldmg face on all tower elements. 6 The elevated building segments on the south and east elevations shall be made deeper (at least doubled m size) to alleviate the "false front" appearance of these segments C Technical Review Committee The Techmcal Review Committee reviewed the protect on June 20, 2001 The protect was approved by the Committee subtect to all standard conditions of approval that have been Included within the attached Resolution of Approval. ~ ~ ~J r1 LJ D Environmental Assessment Conditional Use Permit No 99-25 included environmental review and adoption of a Negative Declaration on January 12, 2000 The proposed protect is consistent with Pad C of the Master Plan, which was approved as a fast food restaurant pad No additional environmental review was regwred for this Design Review application including detailed Site Plan and Budding Elevations °~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC 2001-00231 - HOGLE-IRELAND, INC • July 25, 2001 Page 3 CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public heanng in the Inland Valley Dadv Bulletin newspaper, the propertywas posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radws of the protect site RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the protect through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval Respectfully submitted, ~ ~~ Bra Buller City Planner BB DM mlg Attachments Exhibit "A" -Site Plan Exhibit "B" - Bwlding Elevations Exhibit "C" -Conceptual Landscape Plans Exhibit "D" -Design Review Committee Action dated June 19, 2001 Resolution of Approval with Conditions ~3 ee. mw cµEEq E CC .I . ,'(I ` _ -, _ ~ ~ D'ELM_AR APARTMENTS ' ^"'~• - _ -i'"~ ~ :='' EaIMX ,RnEExr R+ I i _ '~ 'I 'I r _ __ ~ - 1 ~ _ - ZONE MH ~ I t ~ _ r ~~ _ _ . _ c" ~ m.E MY. co«nr~ i ;I ~ it ...{;; ':_'~ ,Ll':I __)';ii~: `I 1~- i-_ ~ ~-~" 1 i i 1 .c - .. .-' _ __ ~~__~ t ~ 1-}_ ~•„ ~ _ _ UCH STREET ~'L i `, ~- ,e~E 1 ~ ~~ _ .; „~r '-~;rr r I,r, 2 r ~ 1 ~ i . ~_- U.. W W Q WI ~~{i 5 r -'~~~ "'r' 11 F ~ ~ -1`I FUTURE HICH DENSITY ~; /,///,/J r~/~}}~~'' R SIDENTIAL ~ .,YK air _ ib MNpr t uwscux RwER 1 ~ r 1 i"~ i ~~~ l J` _ ~ r' ' oeEO cf1KREE -. _ .rcx `r'l1 .4 ~-FIw1x[E 6WCVEEE ~ ~ I l -- 9rE Ew,aiwE uO I ~_ _ 11~~ i acve nE .ors '1~ ~ ~}~~:E'L Rel. OW'S ~ r~ __ ~~ [y~ ~ ~ 4>" F`~' 1 rs• ' ~ •r 1 BpM1 a' _ ` x Y 1 I ' J 111 W''~~'"' ~ , - -_ i i •~~'~ EX6TNG - /~t ~ _ - ~ F TEXACO ~ _ f~~~~~~]]]]]]~~1~~- I -y~c~. __ __- - _ _ _ r US STALpN r ~ 7~1`~ _ lCt~~ _ `~ - g,^R[ E n I~~@QEJI~~ 4~y xRI- _ '~Ib'~I'~ F I ~r I ~~®! wr &~ I -ffiI ~°:: R ~L ~''y- ~. ,[ r to ~,~ I ~ ~i k C~v t~/ ~ I{~~-I I,LLII I ~y-~~y~~~~(/fl~~~~.] d E~ ~ ~ r -5. wX ~ ~ A U3~Mt' ,a1A -C ~~ .. Ry. ~ ~` _~eil.V _.. ~ r r ~...~Vnr v M •~r ' E6MC aYEICVwxr _ / ~ r „ r Sfx4[ E IuMC.R / xE1ACEI11C SOEV.IL[ --l 1~1 J Ma,4A21A~mc~l0 _ = W lfN EE4iK -- - - .y - - - - - - - - - --- - __ FOOTHILL BOULEVARD ~ nc~wE;;~EER IppA YET[ cOYYw1T R.1x r / ~. `~ ~ VACANT - [Eaves er Dams G~ 41 w• PE4 A R®.. - .R ,EE;E9 iY CFx1P l R41C M! IIYO R4 l1ERR1 NSIA CpMM1Y RW ~`~ ( "` \ ~' 1'- IINCM SW OEYJ _ AEacu csxrE~ 1 "._ ~I , 1 ,I II I "- n- I I ~i I _.~ sa Z L w Q W Y I l canm nRMwEE Re l C 161w CdICE.IE IMf apFLK) - . IFM,IV6,.1 caWMY R.x rtrrt 1 GTEWAII ,,, , , imli;9~5RP5 THE COMMONS °° °° ~xX~ NWC FOOTHILL BOULEVARD & MILLIKEN AVENUE _ RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA A RROIECT FOR „_„n _~,,,_, a~" LEWIS OPERATING CORP eRm YgNfan ^VE C1~ CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE A A A C` T f T tl I A n l EdaRW. ~m ~~ ~e~ 9:i RFIE ENnWm•eM Ibq Y9 ~~~ ~~~ ~~~~~ P ., ~~ ~xh~b~i~-I e ., 3 Y9 ~~~ ~~~ ~~~~~ • 4 ~~ F~ ~ ~.~„b,1-B2 ~~ I I I I ` ~ oenw .a~wlw. I ~ wo ~wAna ~o 1411 f1~Olp'l M .n. a • I_ ro ~ ~ ,--~. QROOGR 9~0 YAT~ M7 '~1 r- • n 0 0 ,o ~~ ~~~ r 43M RNIRS! ~ o DA~O 5t. L° py xATy ht¢DON/~LDS LM ~ I or co-rsrwcna~ Lr! I --~ Vv v v L L vv v vvvvv L L L v v V L L L ~ V v v y LL v ~ vvLL LL LL vvV~ vvv LL LL LLLL . O°. ••/~ '~ ~~ R 1 C 0 C n AI f ~~ I I c 41 I I L4 AI i KI I ~~~ ~ l1 = n n T U T I I R I \/ f7 o~~*b~++~~ ~ DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 8 00 p m Debra Meier June 19, 2001 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (DRC2001-00231) - HOGLE-IRELAND. INC. -The review of detailed site plan and building elevations for McDonald's Restaurant on 144-acres of land wnthin the previously approved Terra Vista Commons Master Plan located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard west of Milliken Avenue in the Mixed Use (MFC) Distnct of the Terra Vista Community Plan - APN• 107-421-98 and 227-771-53 Related file Conditional Use Permit 99-25 Design Parameters: Conditional Use Penmt 99-25 was approved by the Commission on January 12, 2001. This approval included the Master Plan and Design Guidelines for The Commons at Terra Vista, a master planned commeraal center, the approval of Pad E, which has been constructed, and the conceptual approval of Pad D as afast-food dnve-thru restaurant. The proposed McDonald's is located on Pad D. The Commons at Terra Vista is a mixed-use master plan concept, that will eventually include a combination of retail, restaurants, service stations, and high-density residential development. The residential component has only been approved as a master plan in concept at this time. The proposed budding elevations reflect all the details, matenals and color palette, as established by the Master Plan Design Gudelines, and the structures that have been completed within The Commons to date. Staff has no further comments pertaining to the building elevations at this time. Staff Comments The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee . discussion• 1 Construct a 3-foot decorative screen wall along south and east edges of dnve-thru lane (similar to Texaco/A&W dnve-thru in same center) 2 Provide pedestnan access from the sidewalk on Foothill Boulevard to the restaurant. 3 Indicate the location of the "loading zone" that will be used by the tractor-trailer that provides delivenes to the restaurant, and indicate turning radii along the Yuck route 4 Provide elevations of the enclosure wall, trellis structure (shown on page C2.1) and support columns proposed at the outdoor dining patio. 5 Although signage is approved by separate action, you are proposing four building mounted signs in addition to a monument sign The City's Sign Ordinance, and the Uniform Sign Program (USP 134), will allow a maximum of three signs in any combination of wall and/or monument 6 The landscaping required along Foothill Boulevard is more extensive than what is reflected on the plan The protect proponent will need to field venfy the extent of required landscaping to be shown on the plan, pnor to Planning Commission review and approval 7 Fabnc awnings shall be a solid color Staff Recommendation: Staff recommended that the Committee review the protect, address the . issues noted above and any other issues as identified by the Committee members, and forward to the Planning Commission for review and approval ~g DRC COMMENTS DRC2001-00231 - HOGLE-IRELAND • June 19, 2001 Page 2 Design Review Committee Action Members Present Lany McNiel, Pam Stewart, Larry Henderson Staff Planner. Debra Meier The Committee had the following comments pertaining to the issues identified by staff. The items reflected in bold font shall be either revised pnor to the Planning Commission heanng and/or incorporated as a condition of approval. 1 The Committee agreed that the applicant shall incorporate a 3-foot decorative screen wall along the south and east edges of the drive-thru lane. The project ske sits 4 to 5-feet above Foothill Boulevard. Therefore, the screen wall is necessary to properly screen the drive-thru activity. The retaining wall shall include a decorative cap that is coordinated with the building design. 2. The applicant shall provide pedestrian access from the sidewalk on Foothill Boulevard to the restaurant in the location that would resemble the shortest path from the sidewalk that pedestrians would be likely to take. 3. The applicant illustrated the anticipated fuming movements that would likely be used by the tractor-trailer delivery trucks, as well as the location where the truck will be directed to park dunng delivenes in the northerly portion of the parking lot This information was acceptable to the Committee without further revision 4 The applicant illustrated the trellis structure and support columns proposed at the outdoor dining patio All elements of the columns and trellis support structure were compatible with the architectural style and design of the building The Committee requested that vines be added to the base of all columns supporting trellises, in order to provide a greater degree of shade as the vine matures onto the trellis. 5 The information regarding signage was included as infornation only, and will be addressed with a subsequent Sign Permit. 6 The applicant will coordinate with the site developerand complete all necessary landscaping along Foothill Boulevard 7 The matenal sample board provided by the applicant identifies the awnings as a solid Terra Cotta color to match the architectural style The applicant shall incorporate these additional comments made by the Committee 1 Extend the eaves beyond the building face on all tower elements 2. The elevated building segments on the south and east elevations shall be made deeper (at least doubled in size), to alleviate the "false front" appearance of these segments • 3 Vines shall be planted at the base of all trellis support columns, including the outdoor eating patio and over the dnve-thru lane The Committee recommended approval subject to the modifications as noted in herein G RESOLUTION NO A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00231 TO CONSTRUCT A 4,387 SQUARE FOOT RESTAURANT ON 144 ACRE, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD WEST OF MILLIKEN AVENUE IN THE MIXED USE (MFC) DISTRICT OF THE TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 107-421-98 AND 227-771-53 A Recitals 1 Hogle-Ireland, Inc filed an application for the approval of Development Review DRC2001- 00231, as descnbed in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is refen'ed to as "the application " 2 On the 25th day July of 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date 3 All legal preregwsites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Rentals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced meeting on July25, 2001, including wntten and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby spenfically finds as follows a The application applies to property located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard with a street frontage of 254 feet and lot depth of 253 feet and is presently improved with parking lot and landscaping, as well as penmeter street improvements, and b The property to the north and east of the subject site is an undeveloped portion of The Commons Master Plan, the property to the south consists of undeveloped land in the Industnal Park Distnct, and the property to the west is a completed retail pad building, and c The proposed protect consists of the development of a McDonald's Restaurant on Pad D of a previously approved Master Plan for The Commons at Terra Vista (Conditional Use Permit 99-25), and d Pad D was approved in concept on the Master Plan as a fast food restaurant v~nth a dnve through order window, and e The proposed protect is located within a Mixed Use Distnct of the Terra Vista Community Plan (MFC - Finannal/RestauranUResidential) and has been designed is accordance with the standards of the distnct, and the guidelines of the approved Master Plan ~b PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO DRC2001-00231 - HOGLE-IRELAND, INC July 25, 2001 Page 2 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a The proposed protect is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan, and b The proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the distnct in which the site is located, and c The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Terra Vista Community Plan and The Master Guidelines of The Commons at Terra Vista, and d The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or matenally intunous to properties or improvements in the vicinity 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed project, togetherwdh all wntten and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the approval of Conditional Use Perrmt 99-25, the protect is in substantial conformance with the approved Conditional Use Permit and Master Plan Therefore, no additional environmental assessment was conducted with the DevelopmenUDesign Review Conditional Use Permit 99-25 was approved in January 2000, which included an Environmental Assessment, Mitigated Negative Declaration, and Mitigation Monitonng Plan This application was substantially consistent with the approved Conditional Use Permit, therefore no further environmental review was deemed necessary 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Division 1) A 3-foot high decorative screen wall shall be incorporated along the south and east edges of the dnve-thru lane, similar in design to the existing wall for Texaco's dnve-thru The screen wall is necessary to properly screen the dnve-thru activity from Foothill Boulevard The wall shall include a decorative cap that is coordinated with the bwlding design 2) Provide pedestnan access from the sidewalk on Foothill Boulevard to the restaurant The access shall be provided in the location that would resemble the shortest path from the sidewalk that pedestnans would be likely to take, in order to avoid trails through the landscaping 3) Vines shall be planted at the base of all trellis support columns, including the outdoor eating area and the dnve-thru lanes, in order to provide a greater degree of shade as the vine matures onto the trellis 4) The applicant shall coordinate with the site developer and complete all necessary landscaping along Foothill Boulevard 5) The eaves shall extend beyond the bwlding face on all tower elements ~1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO DRC2001-00231 - HOGLE-IRELAND, INC July 25, 2001 Page 3 BY 6) The elevated building segments on the south and east elevations shall be made deeper (at least doubled m size) to alleviate the "false front" appearance of these segments Enaineenna Diwsion 1) There is a public storm dram m the Foothill Boulevard Parkway Trees are prohibited within 5-feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF JULY 2001 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Larry T McNiel, Chauman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of July 2001, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS ~,~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENI~ STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DRC2001-00231 SUBJECT: McDonald's Restaurant APPLICANT: Hogle-Ireland, Inc LOCATION: North side of Foothill Boulevard west of Milliken Avenue ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements com le4on Dat 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its _/_/_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relingwsh such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole ' discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such partiapation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 A copy of the signed Resolution of Approval or City Planner's letter of approval, and all Standard _/_/_ Conditions, shall be included in legible form on the grading plans, building and construction plans, and landscape and irrigation plans submitted for plan check B. Time Limits 1 Conditional Use Permit, Vanance, or Development/Design Review approval shall expire if _/_/_ building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include _/_/_ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, the Terra Vista Community Plan and the Master Plan and Design Guidelines for the Commons of Terra Vista X13 sc-os.o, Protect No DRC2001-00231 Comole6on Date 2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions • of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Bulding and Safety Drviston to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and bulding elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bulding permits 5 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, bwlding, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Speafic Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance 7 A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) pnor to the issuance of bwlding permits Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adtacent properties 8 Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards The final design, locations, and the number of trash receptacles shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits . 9 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc , shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For single family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 10 All bulding numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and conase manner, including proper Illumination 11 Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock Other stone veneers may be manufactured products D. Shopping Centers 1 A uniform hardscape and street furniture design including seating benches, trash receptacles, free-standing potted plants, bike racks, light bollards, etc , shall be utilized and be compatible with the architectural style Detailed designs shall be submitted for Planning Division review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 2 Provide for the following design features in each trash enclosure, to the satisfaction of the City Planner a Architecturally integrated into the design of (the shopping centerlthe protect) b Separate pedestrian access that does not require the opening of the main doors and to include self-closing pedestrian doors • c Large enough to accommodate two trash bins d Roll-up doors ~~ SC-06-01 2 -/-/- -/-/- / / I / / / / / / / -/-/- / / / / / / / / / / / / / / I I Protect No DRC2001-00237 Completion Date e Trash bins with counter-weighted lids _/_/_ f Architecturally treated overhead shade trellis _/_/~ g Chain link screen on top to prevent trash from blowing out of the enclosure and designed to _/_/_ be hidden from view 3 Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours _/_/_ 4 The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and _/_/_ debns remain for more than 24 hours 5 The lighting fixture design shall compliment the architectural program It shall include the plaza _/_/_ area lighting fixtures, bwlding lighting fixtures (exterior), and parking lot lighting fixtures 6 Any outdoor vending machines shall be recessed into the building faces and shall not extend into _/_/_ the pedestrian walkways The design details shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits E. Building Design 1 All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or _/_/_ protections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Division Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the budding design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner Details shalt be included in building plans 2 For commercai and industrial pro/ects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main _/_/ building colors • F. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1 All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long When a side of any parking space abuts _/_/_ a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide 2 All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall _/_I_ contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb) 3 All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, _/_/_ and exits shall be striped per City standards 4 Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commercial and office faalities with 25 or more _/_/_ parking stalls Designate two percent or one stall, whichever is greater, of the total number of stalls for use by the handicapped G. Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in _/_/_ the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bwlding permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 A minimum of 20% of trees planted within industrial protects, and a minimum of 30% within _/_/_ commercial and office protects, shall be specimen size trees - 24-inch box or larger • 3 Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking _/_I stalls, suffiaent to shade 50% of the parking area at solar noon on August 21 ~~ SC-06-01 Prgect No DRC2001-00231 Completion Date 4 Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one _/_/_ tree per 30 linear feet of building 5 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included _/_I_ in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Division 6 Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meandering _/_/_ sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along Foothill Boulevard 7 Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the _/_/_ perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 8 Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the prinaples of _/_/_ Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19 16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code H. Signs 1 The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval _/_/_ Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall requve separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any signs APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS• ~. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following _/_/_ a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single fine diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Division Project Number (i e , TT #, CUP #, DR #, etc) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report _/_/_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are regwred prior to plan check submttttai 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to _/_/_ the City prior to permit issuance 4 Business shall not open far operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the _/_/_ Building and Safety Division IW SC-06-01 4 Protect No DRC2001-00231 Completion Date J. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved pnor to construction All plans shalt be _/_/_ marked with the protect file number (t a ,CUP 98-01) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electnc Code, Title 24 Accessibility regwrements, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Please contact the Building and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commeraal or industrial development or addition _/_/_ to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to Transportation Development Fee, Drainage Fee, School Fees, Permit and Plan Checking Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Diviston prior to permit issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Bulding Official, after tracUparcel map recordation and _/_/_ pnor to issuance of building permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday _/_/_ through Saturday, wtth no construction on Sunday or holidays 5 Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Division's public _/_/_ counter) K. New Structures 1 Plans for food preparation areas shall be approved by County of San Bernardino Environmental _/_/ Health Services prior to issuance of bulding permits ~ 2 Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, to accordance with UBC Table _/_/_ 5-A 3 Provide smoke and heat venting in accordance with UBC Section 906 _/_/_ L. Grading 1 Grading of the subtect property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City _/_/ Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to _/_/_ perform such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the _/_/_ time of application for grading plan check 4 The hnal grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance of building permits _/_/_ 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction protects and for _/_/ existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The Grading Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a Califorrna Registered Crvd Engineer ~~ SC-06-01 5 Protect No DRC2001-00231 Completion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION ~LANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: M. Community Facilities Districts 1 This protect is subject to the requirements of the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Distract N. Water Plans for Fire Protection 1 Prior to issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and the Water District 2 Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District standards 3 Fire flow requirements for this protect shall be 1.500 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as amended The required fire flow shall be delivered by fue hydrants located in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-B, as amended 4 All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible building materials on-site (i e , lumber, roofing materials, etc) Water District personnel shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The builder/developer shall submit test report to the Fire Safety Dmsion 5 All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible building materials on-site (i e , lumber, roofing materials, etc) Fire Construction • Services representative shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The builder/developer shall submit final test report to the Fire Safety Division 6 Existing fire hydrants and mains within 600 feet of the protect shall be shown on the water plan submitted for review and approval Include main size 7 Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground 8 Required Note If the system is private the applicant shall do the following prior to the issuance of the building permit a Submit proof that provisions have been made for the annual testing, repair and maintenance of the system A copy of the maintenance agreement shall be submitted to the District b For developments with multiple owners, they shall establish a reaprocal maintenance agreement, which shall be submitted to the Fire District for acceptance 9 Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, all fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers" On private property these markers are to be maintained in good condition by the property owner O. Water Availability 1 Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall provide evidence of adequate fire flow The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Water Availability for Fire Protection • Form shall be signed by the Water Distract and submitted for approval by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District If sufficient water to meet fire flow requirements is not available, an automatic fire extingwshing system may be regwred in each structure affected by the insufficient flow E Ig SC-06-01 6 -/-/. _/_/ -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/. -/_/. -/- . -/-/. -/-/. Protect No DRC2001-00231 Comolehon Date P. Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems • 1 RCFPD Ordinance 15 or other adopted code or standard, requires an approved automatic fire _/_/_ sprinkler system 2 Any modification or remodel to a fire sprinkler system requires Fire District approval, and a _/_/_ permu NO WORK is permuted without a permit issued by Ftre Construction Services 3 All Group A Occupancies with an occupant load of 50 or more persons shall be protected by an _/_/_ approved automatic fire sprinkler system 4 Required Note Prior to the recordation of ANY map, a note shall be placed on the map stating _/_/_ that all commercial structures great than 7,500 square feet, all Group A or E Occupances with an occupant load of 50 or more persons, all multi-family residential structures, and all structures which do not meet Fire District access requirements (Section "E" -Fire Access), shall be protected by an automatic fire sprinkler system meeting the approval of the Fire District 5 Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit plans for any automatic fire _/_/_ sprinkler system to the Fire District for review and approval No work is allowed without a Fire District permit 6 Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested _/_/_ and accepted by the Fire District 7 The fire sprinkler system monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately _/_/_ following the completion of the fire sprinkler system Monitoring is regwred with 20 sprinklers in Group I Occupancies, or 100 or more sprinklers in all other Occupancies Q. Fi re Access • 1 Commercial Prior to recordation of a subdivision/tract/parcel map or the issuance of any grading _//_ permit, whichever occurs first, the applicant shall obtain approval of the Ftre District for all Fire District emergency access roads to within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior of every structure on-sue 2 Residential & Commercal Prior to issuance of any grading permits, the applicant shall submit and _/_/_ obtain approval of plans for all roads, streets and courts, public or private, from the Fire District m consultation with the Grading Committee The plans shall include the plan view, secttonai wew, and indicate the width of the street or court measured flow line to flow line All proposed fire apparatus turnarounds shall be clearly marked when adead-end street exceeds 150 feet or when otherwise regwred Applicable CC&Rs, or other approved documents, shall contain prowstons that prohibit obstructions such as traffic calming devices (speed bumps, humps, etc ), control gates, bollards, or other mod cations in fire lanes or access roadways without prior written approval of the Fire District, Fire Safety Division 3 The minimum width for a Fire District access road or fire lane is 26 feet The minimum inside turn _/_/_ radius is 20 feet The minimum outside turn radds is 50 feet The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 50 feet The minimum vertical clearance is 14 feet, 6 inches At any entry median the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20 feet 4 All portions of the faality or any portion of the exterior wall of the first story shall be located within _/_/_ 150 feet of Fire Distract vehicle access, measured by an unobstructed approved route around the exterior of the building Approved access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to exterior bulding openings i ~-q SC-06-01 Protect No DRC2001-00231 Comolehon Date . 5 A Knox rapid entry key vault shall be installed prior to final inspection Proof of purchase shall be submitted prior to final bulding plan approval Contact the Fire Safety Division for speck details and ordering information 6 Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the applicant shall submtt and obtain the Fire District's approval of the construction of any gate across requred Fire District access roadways/driveways 7 Trees and shrubs planted in any median shall be kept trimmed to a mtnimum of 14 feet, 6 inches from the ground up, so as not to impede fire vehicles 8 A note shall be placed on all plans which clearly indicates the following Emergency access, a minimum 26 feet m width and 14 feet, 6 inches in height shall be provided and maintained free and clear of any obstructions at all times during construction, in accordance with Fire District Standards 9 Prior to the issuance of a bulding perntt, the applicant shall submit plans and obtain approval from the Fire District for fire lanes on required Fire District access roadway less than 40 feet to width The plans shall indicate the locations of red curbing and stgnage A drawing of the proposed signage that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be submitted to and approved Contact the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District at (909) 477-2770 for a copy of the "FD Access -Fire Lanes" standard 10 Prior to the issuance of any Cert~cete of Occupancy, the fire lanes shall be installed in accordance with the approved fire lane plan The CC&Rs or other approved documents shall contain a fire lane map and provisions that prohibit parking in the fire lanes The method of enforcement shall be documented The CC&Rs shall also identify who is responsible for not less than annual inspecbon and maintenance of all regwred fire lanes • 11 New buildings other than dwellings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness When the bulding setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street an additional non- ilfuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance R. Combustible Construction Letter 1 Required Note Prior to the issuance of a bulding permit for combustible construction, the builder shall submit a letter to the Fire District on company letterhead stating that water for fire fighting purposes and the all weather fire protection access road shall be m place and opera4onal before any combustible material is placed on-site S. Architectural Building Plans 1 Prior to approval of a site developmenUuse permit, or the issuance of a building permit, whichever occurs first, the applicant shall submit plans for the review and approval of the Fire District Call the Fire Construction Services Unit at (909) 477-2713 for the Fire Safety Site/Architectural Notes to be placed on the plans prior to submittal T. Fire Suppression System 1 Prior to the issuance of a building permit, plans and speaficetions for the fire suppression system for the protection of commeraal-type cooking egwpment shall be submitted to the Fire District for review and approval No work is allowed without a Fire Dtstrid permit 2 Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire suppression system(s) shall be tested and accepted by the Ftre District ~b sc-os-o1 a -/-/- -/-/- I / / / I / / / / / -/-/- -/-/ -/-/- -/-/- Protect No DRC2001-00231 Comoletion Date U. Fees " " 1 Fire District fee(s), plus a $1 00 microfilm fee per plan page will be due to the Rancho Cucamonga _/_/ Fire District as follows " x $132 for Water Plan Review for Public Fire Protection x $132 for Private Fire Mains or Ftre Sprinkler Underground Water Suppiy x $677 (per new budding) for New Commercial and Industrial Development "Note Separate plan check fees for tenant improvement work, fire protection systems (fire sprinklers, alarm systems, fire extinguishing systems, etc ), and/or any wnsultant reviews will be assessed upon separate submittals of plans V. Hazard Control Permits 1 As noted below Special Permits may be required, dependent upon intended use a Operate a place of public assembly _/_/_ b Compressed gases (storage, handling, or use exceeding 100 cubic feet _/_/_ W. Hazardous Materials 1 Any business that uses, generates, processes, produces, treats, stores, emits, or discharges a _/_/_ hazardous material in quantities at or exceeding 55 gallons, 500 pounds, or 200 cubic feet (compressed gas) at any one time in the course of a year 2 All hazardous waste enerators re ardless f u ntit n r t d . / / g , g q y ge o a e a e _ _ 3 Any business that handles, stores, or uses Category (I) or (II) pesticides, as defined by FIFRA, _/_/_ regardless of amount 4 Any business that handles DOT Hazard Class 1 (explosives, found in 49 CFR) regardless of _/_/_ amount 5 Any business that handles extremely hazardous substances (EHS's) in quantities exceeding the _/_/_ threshold planning quantity (T P O) Extremely Hazardous Substances are designated pursuant to the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act Section 302, and are listed in 40 CFR Part 355 See Appendix B of this guide for an alphabetical list of EHS's 6 Any business subtect to the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act (EPCRA), _//_ also known as SARA Title III Generally, EPCRA includes faalities that handle hazardous substances above 10,000 pounds, or extremely hazardous substances above threshold planning quantities There are some exceptions, including retail gas stations with up to 75,000 gallons of gasoline or 100,000 gallons of diesel fuel in Underground Storage Tanks (UST's) that meet the 1998 upgrade regwrements To get more information on EPCRA regwrements call 1-800-535-0202 Due to State disclosure consolidation laws, Tier II forms need not be submitted to the various State and Federal agencies Submission of your Business Emergency/ Contingency Plan will meet this regwrement, however, EPCRA does require full annual inventory submission rather than a certification statement each March 1 Also, EPCRA facilities are bound by the trade secret limitations of EPCRA, and must sign every page of inventory 7 Any business that handles radioactive material that is listed in Appendix B of Chapter 1, of _/_/_ 10 CFR • 8 If the facility is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by Building and Safety will not _/_/_ be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fire Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan California Government Code, Section 65850 2 prohibits the City SC-06-01 ~~~ 9 Prolecl No DRC2001-00231 Comolehon Date from tsswng a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting speaf'ic . hazardous material disclosure requirements A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be required if regulated substances are to be used or stored at the new faality Contact County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-3041 for forms and assistance 9 Any business that operates on rented or leased property, and is required to submit a Plan, is _/_/_ requred to submit a notice to the owner of the property in writing stating that the business is subtect to the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan mandates, and has complied with the provision, and must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within 5 working days after receiving a request from the owner 10 The Fire Code adopted by the Fire Distract has a provision requiring collection of information _/_/_ regarding hazardous materials at facilities for purposes of Fire Code implementation and emergency response Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy a copy of the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan -New Business (Hazardous Materials Release Response Plans and Inventory) shall be submitted to the Fire Distract after tt is approved by the San Bernardrno County Ftre Department In some cases additional infonmation that is not in the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan may be regwred in order to support local fire prevention and emergency response programs X. Plan Submittal Required Notice 1 Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 1997/98 Bwlding, _/_/_ Fire, Mechanical, and Plumbing Codes, 1999 Electrical and RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD32, Gwdelmes and Standards NOTE Separate plan check fees for tenant improvements, fire protection systems and/or any _/_/_ consultant reviews will be assessed at time of submittal of plans NOTE A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction protects and for _/_/_ • existing buldings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped and signed by a California Registered Professional Civil Engineer Y. Other Requirements/Comments 1 NOTE Prior to Planning Division approval the applicant must address all, and resolve all Fire _/_/_ District comments and/or conditions APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS. Z. Security Lighting 1 All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power _/_/_ These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell 2 All bwldtngs shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings, with _/_/_ direct lighting to be provided by all entryways Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development 3 Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures _/_/_ AA. Security Hardware 1 One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors If windows are within _/_/_ . 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used lockin devices slide bolts or some t e of seconda h ll h ll ll d I / yp ry g oors s a ave garage or ro ing 2 A _ _ _ SC-O6-01 ~~ 10 Protect No DRC2001-00231 ComoleGOn Date 3 All roof openings giving access to the bwlding shall be secured with either iron bars, metal gates, _/_/_ or alarmed • BB. Windows 1 All sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be Itfted _I_/_ from frame or track in any manner 2 Store front windows shall be visible to passing pedestrians and traffic _/_/_ 3 Security glazing is recommended on store front windows to resist window smashes and impede _/_/_ entry to burglars 4 Security/burglar bars are not recommended, particularly m residences, due to the delay or _/_/_ prevention of a speedy evacuation in case of fire CC. Building Numbering 1 Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime _/_/_ wsibihty DD. Alarm Systems 1 Install a burglar alarm system and a panic alarm if needed Instructing management and _/_/_ employees on the operation of the alarm system will reduce the amount of false alarms and m turn save dollars and Itves 2 Alarm companies shall be provided with the 24-hour Sheriffs dispatch number (909) 941-1488 _/_/~ r 1 LJ ~~ SC-O6-01 11 • T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE July 25, 2001 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, Clty Planner BY Dan Coleman, Pnncipal Planner SUBJECT TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS • BACKGROUND The term for the equestnan representative, Sue Rabone, expired in Apnl 2001 Staff has contacted Mrs Rabone and she does not wish to be reappointed because of conflicts with her work schedule and the fact that she no longer ndes the trails The bicycling representative seat has been vacant for several years on the Committee The Committee meets once a month, as needed, usually on the second Wednesday of the month at 6 00 p m All terms are for 24 months The City's General Plan requires that the equestrian member of the Trails Advisory Committee be a member of the Alta Loma Riding Club In the past, the Planning Commission has directed staff to solicit applications, and suitable applicants were interviewed by a subcommittee The recommendations ofthe subcommittee would be forwarded to the Planning Commission for consideration RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission direct staff to advertise to solicit qualified applicants to fill both seats Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB DC\ma • ITEM F