Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999/02/17 - Minutes February 17, 1999 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Re.qular Meetinq A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, February 17, 1999, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 7:07 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander. Present were Councilmembers: Paul Biane, James Curatalo, Bob Dutton, Diane Williams, and Mayor William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Linda Daniels, RDA Director; Rick Gomez, Community Development Director; Brad Buller, City Planner; Dan Coleman, Principal Planner; Tom Grahn, Associate Planner; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer; Bill Makshanoff, Building Official; Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director; Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director; Paula Pachon, Management Analyst It; Deborah Clark, Library Director; Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Captain Rod Hoops, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS No announcements or presentations were made. C:. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC C1. Don Fenstermaker, Field Representative forAssemblywoman Nell Soto, introduced himself. He told about the committees that Assemblywoman Soto has been appointed to and added that they are here to serve Rancho Cucamonga. C2. Debra Berger, who lives on Hillside between the Tolstoy House and Schowalter Rock Pile, stated she would like to see the old homes on Foothill restored. She also commented on other historic homes and their importance to the community. She asked that the Council consider something other than bulldozing the homes on Foothill. City Council Minutes February 17, 1999 Page 2 D. CONSENT CALENDAR Jack Lam, City Manager stated he would like to add the following item to the Consent Calendar: "Approval of Map and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No.4 and Street lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 .and 4 for Tract Map Number 15072-1 and 15072, located on the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Rochester Avenue, submitted by Kaufman and Broad of Southern California, Inc., a California Corporation." MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Curatalo to add the above stated item as No. 19 to the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. D1. Approval of Minutes: December 8, 1998 (Special meeting) D2. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of January 31, 1999. D3. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 1/13/99, 1/20/99, 1/27/99 and 2/3/99 and Payroll ending 1/7/99 and 1/21/99 for the total amount of $4,629,006.83. D4. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the painting and exterior stucco repair to the sports facility to be funded from Account No.. 25-4285-7043. RESOLUTION NO. 99-026 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE PAINTING AND EXTERIOR STUCCO REPAIR TO THE SPORTS FACILITY IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS D5. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the local street pavement rehabilitation - overlay, to be funded from Account No. 32-4637-9113. RESOLUTION NO. 99-027 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF LOCAL. STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS D6. Approval of the Resolutions modifying the Engineer's Report and confirming the assessments to complete capital projects on 4th Street from Utica to Pittsburgh Avenues, within the boundaries of an assessment district formerly known as Assessmerit District No. 82-1R (6th Street Industrial District), and to appropriate $687,200 from Fund 93 (AD 82-1 R) Account No. 93-4130. City Council Minutes February 17, 1999 Page 3 RESOLUTION NO. 99-028 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING CHANGES AND MODIFICATIONS AND DIRECTING ACTIONS WITH RESPECT THERETO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 82-1 (6TM STREET INDUSTRIAL AREA) RESOLUTION NO. 99-029 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE MODIFIED ENGINEER'S REPORT, CONFIRMING THE ASSESSMENTS, AND ORDERING THE WORK FOR CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 82-1 (6TM STREET INDUSTRIAL. AREAl) D7. Approval of a Resolution authorizing the destruction of City records pursuant to California Government Code Section 34090 and the City's Records Retention Schedule. RESOLUTION NQ 99-030 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF CITY RECORDS WHICH ARF NO LONGER REQUIRED AS SET FORTH IN CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 34090 AND OTHER APPLICABLE LEGAL REFERENCES DS. Approval of request by the San Bernardino County Sheriff's West Valley Search and Rescue Team to waive temporary use permit fee in conjunction with the Annual 5/10K Run event on April 24, 1999. D9. Approval of Improvement Agreement, improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for Development Review 97-38 (modified), located on the south side of Arrow Route, between Utica Avenue and Red Oak Street, submitted by Public Storage, Inc. RESOLUTION NO. 99-031 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENTAGREEMENTAND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 97-38 (MODIFIED) RESOLUTION NO. 99-032 A RESOLUTION OF THE: CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 97-38 (MODIFIED) D10. Approval of Improvement Agreement: and Improvement Security for MDR 97-19, located at 10900 Fourth Street, submitted by W9/WLA Rea~ Estate Limited Partnership. City Council Minutes February 17, 1999 Page 4 RESOLUTION NO. 99-033 A RESOLUTION OF THE CI, TY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENTAGREEMENTAND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR MDR 97-19 Dll. Approval of the. Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for all interior street improvements, parkway improvements, and signalization at Terra Vista Drive and Church Street, Rochester Avenue and Base Line Road, Mountain View Drive and Milliken Avenue, related to Tentative Tract 15072, generally located at the southwest corner of Rochester Avenue and Baseline Road, submitted by Kaufmann and Broad of Southern California, Inc., a California Corporation. RESOLUTION NO. 99-034 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENTAGREEMENTAND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR ALL INTERIOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS, PARKWAY IMPROVEMENTS AND SIGNALIZATION, RELATED TO TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 15072 D12. Appropriate $200,000.00 from the Fund Balance of Local Measure I Fund 32 to be placed in Local Measure I Fund Account No. 32-4637-9707, award and authorize the execution of the Contract (CO 99-021 ) in the amount of $223,919.41 ($203,563.10 plus 10% contingency) for the construction of the Fourth Street Rehabilitation Project, from 323'+ west of Santa Anita Street to 2277'_+ east of Santa Anita Avenue to the apparent low bidder to be funded from Prop 111 Fund Account No. 10-4637-9707 ($219969.41) and Measure I Fund Account No. 32-4637-970'7 ($3,950.00). D13. Approval of a Maintenance Agreement (CO 99-022) between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the San Bernardino County Flood Control District and a request to summarily vacate a portion of Carnelian Street both in conjunction with the proposed realignment of Carnelian Street from Vivero Street to 1000 feet southerly. RESOLUTION NO. 99-035 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITYAND THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT RESOLUTION NO. 99-036 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY' COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF CARNELIAN STREET D14. Approval of License Agreement (CO 99-023) between San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) and the City of Rancho Cucarnonga for the Underground Storm Drain Crossing across the Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA) Railroad, generally located on Etiwanda Avenue 600 feet south of Whirtram Ave. for Development Review 94-16 by Ameron, Inc. City Council Minutes February 17, 1999 Page 5 RESOLUTION NO. 99-037 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING LICENSE AGREEMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 94-16, STORM DRAIN INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE ON SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENT RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY D15. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Parcel Map 14376, located at the northwest corner of Rancheria and Red Hill Country Club Drives, submitted by Longwell Investments, Inc. RESOLUTION NO. 99-038 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR PARCEL MAP 14376 D 16. Approval to release the Maintenance Bond for DR 96-21, located on the southeast corner of Buffalo Avenue and San Marino Street, submitted by' Oltrnans Construction Company. Release Maintenance Bond #B275 00 36 $11,550.00 D17. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bonds, accept Maintenance Bonds, and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for Tracts 13279, 14534, 14534-1 and -2, submitted by William Lyon Homes, Incorporated, located on the southeast corner of Rochester Avenue and Victoria Park Lane. RESOLUTION NO. 99-039 A RESOLUTION OF THE CfT'Y COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACTS 13279, 14534, 14534-1 AND -2, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE! WORK D18. Approval to accept the Haven Avenue Rehabilitation, from Foothill Boulevard to Base Line Road, Contract No. 98-043, as complete, release the bonds and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $303,361.05. RESOLUTION NO. 99-040 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR HAVEN AVENUE REHABILITATION, FROM FOOTHILL BOULEVARD TO BASE LINE ROAD, CONTRACT NO. 98-043 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D19. Approval of Map and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No.4 and Street lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 4 for Tract Map Number 15072-1 and 15072, located on the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Rochester Avenue, submitted by Kaufman and Broad of Southern California, Inc., a California Corporation. City Council Minutes February 17, 1999 Page 6 RESOLUTION NO. 99-042 A RESOLUTION OF THE CI'TY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NO. 15072-1 AND 15072 RESOLUTION NO. 99-043 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIT OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND4 FOR TRACT MAP NUMBER 15072-1 AND 15072 MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Curatalo to approve the Consent Calendar as amended. carried unanimously, 5-0. Motion E. CONSENT ORDINANCES No Items Submitted. F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS Fl. CONSIDERATION OF PUBLIC INTEREST, CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY IN GRANTING A TAXICAB SERVICE PERMIT TO ONTARIO CAB COMPANY Jack Lam, City Manager, stated this has been withdrawn and there is no need to conduct the public hearing. F2. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTAND TIME EXTENSION FORVESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 14475 - ALLARD ENGINEERING - Appeal of the Planning Commission's denial of a request for an extension of a previously approved tentative tract map including design review for the development of 66 single family lots on 113 acres of land in the Hillside Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) and Open Space Districts, located north of Almond between Sapphire and Turquoise Streets - APN: 200-051-07 and 55 through 57. Staff report presented by Rebecca VanBuren, Associate Planner. She also presented slides showing this project area and referred to other correspondence which is on file in their records. Councilmember Curatalo clarified if staff had warned the applicant nine months before this was due to expire. Rebecca VanBuren, Associate Planner, stated yes they did and that they had not heard back from the applicant until October. City Council Minutes February 17, 1999 Page 7 Councilmember Dutton clarified that there were now two endangered species in that area that were not there before. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council were: Chuck Buquet, Charles Joseph Associates, stated he was hired by the applicant to represent them in this process and to give the Council more information about this appeal. He stated their task is to do what is right. He stated the family has owned this property since 1920. He continued to give background information about the project. He stated staff did not contact the developer until October and that he had witnesses to testify to this. He stated they have kept staff informed as to what is going on with the project. He stated they requested a time extension at the January Planning Commission meeting and pointed out they were denied and that is why they are before the Council tonight. He commented on all the time that has been put into this project and added he did not think the company that provided the survey should be questioned because they are a reputable firm that the City also uses. Stephanie Clare, Attorney for the developer, read an article re CEQA. She referred to the staff report dated 7/8/92, page 140. She stated they have looked for mitigation measures relating to the coastal sage scrub. She stated the environmental review process has not been done, but that the Council could do this through a negative declaration~ Ray Allard, engineer for the project and representing the applicant, stated he has read correspondence relating to the project and the course of events of getting it through the process after he took it over from the first engineer for the project. He stated they were "behind the eight ball" from the beginning because of the protocol survey and the time it took to complete it. Jack Easton, LSA Associates, and in charge of the biological assessment for this project, commented on the surveys that took place and the endangered species information that was discovered, including some sensitive species that staff had also reported. He presented the Council with a boundary map of the property and ex:plained it. He felt that less than1 to 1 mitigation would be more than adequate, and that 1 to 1 would be more than adequate and that 1.4 is more than enough mitigation to compensate for the losses that would result from coastal sage scrub of the proposed prbject, and would therefore reduce impacts to below a level of significance. Mr. Buquet added they have followed up with CCWD and that there is no water issue relating to this property. Cameron Mongreen did not feel this project should be built because there would not be any animals left if it is built. She did not feel all of the sage, animals and history should be taken away. Jim Frost stated he felt most of this area is undevelopable and that the Council should use this for mitigation. Catherine Bridge, 8715 Banyan, felt the Council should vote to keep the land as it is and felt there should be a plan to keep the animals and endangered species there. She felt the wash area was undevelopable. Frank Chervonne, 8060 Crestview Court, stated he agreed with the Planning Commission and felt this project should be rethought. He asked that the Council uphold the Planning Commission's decision because there were many issues that needed to be addressed. City Council Minutes February 17, 1999 Page 8 James Kinney, lawyer in Los Angeles, and homeowner near this area of the project, felt the property value would increase if the project was built. He stated it would also make it more safe if the project was built. He stated there is nothing to prevent the developer from coming back tomorrow to submit the project again since this is already expired. He felt the developer is asking the Council to break the law. He stated they have had many opportunities and have missed them. Chuck Buquet stated they have the right to go forward with this project. He felt they have acted in good faith. He felt the Council has the ultimate say in this project having a chance. He asked for them to give consideration and co~nsider disagreeing with staff and the Planning Commission. Jim Frost stated the map has expired and felt the City can do better. There being no further response, the public hearing was closed. James Markman, City Attorney, stated they have had plenty of time to record the final map and get the Council to approve it. He stated it was not an issue that there are changed circumstances. He stated they could extend the tract map for a period of time and do a CEQA review. He stated they could go along with the Planning Commission's decision and deny the request. He stated he did not see any way around not having a CEQA review. Councilmember Dutton talked about his involvement on the County Economic Development Commission. He stated he is leaning towards property rights, but pointed out he is also concerned about the environment. Councilmember Williams stated she felt this needs to be looked at again and would uphold the Planning Commission's decision. Councilmember Curatalo stated he does not know why the applicant let this expire to begin with. He asked about the comment Mr. Allard made whereby staff had told him it was okay to allow the map to expire as long as he made a request to what. Mr. Allard stated he was told if the request was made prior to the map extending, then time would be allowed for the completion of the report Brad Buller, City Planner, stated they had talked about time lines with Mr. Allard and the process involved. He stated they always pursue time extensions with the intent that there is a possibility of a negative declaration. He stated that was the purpose of his statement to him that if he gets his application in within time, staff would take the necessary steps, but added as it became apparent that there was more to this site, staff stated there was more information and they did not get the information prior to the hearing. Brad stated this question was asked by Mr. Allard back in June or July. James Markman, City Attorney, stated the Map Act has a real clear time line as to when these maps run out if you have applied for an extension. He stated he did not think the staff should be responsible for advising people with valuable property rights when their time is going to run out. Councilmember Biane stated he is normally for the property owner, but stated he felt they needed to take a fresh look at this and he would go along with the Planning Commission. Mayor Alexander stated he agreed and that he felt the environmental issue should be looked at again. He felt they should not have waited until the last minute. He added this could always be resubmitted. City Council Minutes February 17, 1999 Page 9 RESOLUTION NO. 99-041 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION DENYING A TIME EXTENSION FOR VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 14475, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF 66 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 113 ACRES OF LAND IN THE HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL (LESS THAN 2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND THE OPEN SPACE DISTRICTS, LOCATED NORTH OF ALMOND AVENUE BETWEEN SAPPHIRE AND TURQUOISE STREETS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 200~05t-07, 55, 56, AND 5'7. MOTION: Moved by Curatalo, seconded by Alexander to approve Resolution No. 99-041. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. A recess was taken at 8:28 p.m. The meeting was called back to order at 8:40 p.m. with all Councilmembers present. F3. HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST DESIGNATION 98-01 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Consideration of a request to rescind Historic Landmark Designation 94-02, and redesignate as a Point of Interest, four craftsman bungalow residences located at 9618, 9626, 9634, and 9642 Foothill Boulevard APN: 208-153-08 through 11. (Continued from February 3, 1999) Staff report presented by Brad Buller, City Planner, who stated it appears to be too costly to renovate the buildings. He stated they found it would be less costly to replicate the buildings. He stated the neighbors think it is an eyesore and staff still feels it is best to demolish the buildings. Councilmember Biane asked Bill Makshanoff, Building Official, what the condition of the buildings was, and could they be moved to another site. Bill Makshanoff, Building Official, stated he felt they could be relocated and are salvageable, but that it depended upon the amount of funds available to do this. He stated if they are moved, they would still have to comply with handicap access. He felt they could be replicated and would conform with the building code and meet the handicap requirements, which would be less cost than renovating them. Councilmember Williams asked if the owner is willing to replicate the buildings. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated they haw~, not been able to get in touch with the owner. Councilmember Williams felt that new buildings should be built and replicated and felt it would be a lot more cost efficient. Councilmember Curatalo asked what wouild the life span be of retrofitting as opposed to replicating. Bill Makshanoff, Building Official, stated it would be the same life span either way. Councilmember Dutton stated he would like to see the existing structures kept. He asked if there is something they can do to require the property owner to keep the property better maintained. City Council Minutes February 17, 1999 Page 10 Bill Makshanoff, Building Official, stated there are codes available now to maintain occupied buildings, but that they do not apply to vacant buildings. Councilmember Dutton stated he would like to explore something to make property owners more responsible for maintaining these types of properties. Councilmember Williams felt if something is done like this it should not only be for historical buildings, but across the board. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council were: Jim Frost stated he did not think tile Building Official would have sent out a letter unless he was directed to by the Council. He continued to talk about the Historic Preservation Commission and stated they have lost four valuable members of the Commission when they died. He felt that discussion should occur if the Historic Preservation/Planning Commission should remain as the same people. He did not think this serves the City well. He did not think they could do both jobs effectively. He stated he would like to see money budgeted for cultural awareness (historic preservation) by their being an independent commission to serve as the Historic Preservation Commission. He stated he has been in Rancho Cucamonga since 1938. He stated he likes the City and what they have done so far. He stated he would be willing to sit on a committee to help raise funds to save the buildings. He also stated he would like to get some assurance that this will get done. Rick Spurlock, real estate agent for Ana Campos, told about what Ms. Campos has done and the money she has spent to develop this property. He stated he did not think the houses should be linked to Route 66, but felt the gas station was linked. He felt the houses were an eyesore. He added that Ms. Campos does have a buyer for the property. He stated he does not see the significance of preserving these houses. Debra Burger stated it is not really the same to replicate the houses. She felt something should be done with the houses in conjunction with Route 66 and that it could create tourism. She asked what could be put in their place that would be significant if they are taken out. There being no further input, the public hearing was closed.. Councilmember Biane pointed out that Rancho Cucamonga is the only City that is behind Mr. Lundy's efforts in promoting Route 66. He stated he does not appreciate Jim Frost stating there is no one who knows or cares about historic preservation. He stated he lives in a home built in 1930. He stated you can't turn every home into a museum because it is not economically feasible. He felt there should be a task force to look at these historical sites. He stated as far as the cottages, he felt they should be replicated with something to go along with the gas station. Councilmember Dutton stated he does not have a problem with putting funds into historic preservation, but felt that the community should put something into this themselves. He stated he did not think there was anything else that could be done to this site. Councilmember Williams stated she concurred. She stated there are only so many dollars available and that they need to be spent wisely or they get watered down. She stated she would like to see something done to the Red Chief Motel, but knows it is very costly to do so at this time. City Council Minutes February 17, 1999 Page 11 Mayor Alexander stated the buildings that are to be saved have to be prioritized and that they cannot all be built. He stated it is a shame to lose some of the buildings, but the City cannot afford to save them all. MOTION: unanimously, 5-0. RESOLUTION NO. 99-025 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE CHANGE FROM A LOCAL HISTORIC LANDMARK TO POINT OF INTEREST NO. 98-01 FOR FOUR HOUSES, LOCATED AT 9618, 9626, 9634 AND 9642 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD - APN: 208-153-08 THROUGH 11 Moved by Alexander, seconded by Williams to approve Resolution No. 99-025. Motion carried No Items Submitted. No Items Submitted. G. PUBLIC HEARINGS H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS I1. for the relocation of the Isle House. Staff report presented by Tom Grahn, Associate Planner. MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Dutton to approve Contract No. 99-024. unanimously, 5-0. 12. ROUTE 30 AD HOC TASK FORCE UPDATE Staff report presented by Joe O'Neil, City Engineer. Councilmember Biane inquired if Route 30 is still on schedule. ,Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated yes. I. COUNCIL BUSINESS ISLE HOUSE RELOCATION - Consideration of an Agreement (CO99-024) of purchase of property Motion carried ACTION: Report received and filed. City Council Minutes February 17, 1999 Page 12 13. PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES UPDATE A. PARKS & FACILITIES UPDATE 1. Rancho Cucamonga Public Library 2. R.C. Family Sports Center 3. Stadium 4. Red Hill Park 5. Etiwanda Creek Park 6. Central Park B. COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE 1. Seniors 2. Teens 3. Youth Activities 4. Youth Sports 5. Rancho Cucamonga Family Sports Center 6. Adult Sports 7. Proposed Boxing Program 8. Senior Transportation program 9. Trips and Tours 10. Human Services 11. Facilities 12. The Grapevine 13. Contract Classes 14. Community Wide Special Events 15. California Park and Recreation Society Conference 16. Park and Recreation Commission 17. Epicenter ACTION: Report received and filed. J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING Councilmember Biane stated he would like to look at the possibility of setting up a task force to look at historic preservation along Foothill between Archibald to Hellman. K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC No communications were made from the public. City Council Minutes February 17, 1999 Page 13 ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Curatalo to adjourn to executive session to discuss Property Negotiations Per Government Code Section 54956.8 for property located at Rochester, between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Route; Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager, Negotiating Party, regarding Terms of Payment. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0~ '1'he meeting adjourned at 9:40 p.m. No action was taken in executive session. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. A(~'~rfis, CMC City Clerk Approved: March 17, 1999