HomeMy WebLinkAbout2003/04/23 - Agenda Packet
•
n
U
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
~' PLANNING COMMISSION
AGENDA
WEDNESDAY APRIL 23, 2003 7:00 PM
Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center
Council Chamber
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, California
I. CALL TO ORDER
Pledge of Allegiance
Swearing in of Commissioners Fletcher and McPhail
Roll Call
Chairman McNiel _ Vice Chairman Macias
Coin Fletcher- Com McPhail Com Stewart
II. ANNOUNCEMENTS
III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
April 9, 2003
Adjourned Meeting of April 9, 2003
IV. CONSENT CALENDAR
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-
controversial They will be acted on by the Commission at one time without
discussion If anyone has concern over any item, ~t should be removed for
discussion
A ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
DRC2002-00751 - RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION -The
development of four industrial buildings totaling 54,662 square feet
on 4 86 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 13),
located at the southeast corner and southwest corner of 6th Street
and Charles Smith Avenue - APN 229-263-05 and 229-283-04 and
05 Related file Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16009 Staff has
prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts
for consideration (Continued from March 26, 2003)
B ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
DRC2002-00750 -RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION -The
development of fwe industrial bwldings totaling 117,790 square feet
on 7 4 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 14),
located at the southeast corner of 6th Street and the I-15 Freeway -
APN 229-283-08, 10, and 11 Related file Tentatwe Parcel Map
SUBTPM16010 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative
Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration (Continued
from March 26, 2003)
V. PUBLIC HEARINGS
The following dems are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice
their op~mon of the related pro/ect Please wait to be recognrzed by the Chairman
and address the Commission by stating your name and address All such
opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each pro/ect Please sign
in after speaking
C ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL
MAP SUBTPM16009 -RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION -
The subdivision of 4 86 acres of land into 4 parcels in the General
Industrial District (Subarea 13), located at the southeast corner and
southwest corner of 6th Street and Charles Smith Avenue -APN
229-263-05 and 229-283-04 and 05 Related file Development
Review DRC2002-00751 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negatwe
Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration (Continued
from March 26, 2003)
D ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL
MAP SUBTPM16010 -RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION -
The subdwision of 7 4 acres of land into 5 parcels in the General
Industrial District (Subarea 14), located at the southeast corner of
6th Street and the 1-15 Freeway -APN 229-283-08, 10, and 11
Related file Development Review DRC2002-00750 Staff has
prepared a Mitigated Negatwe Declaration of environmental impacts
for consideration (Continued from March 26, 2003)
E ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT DRC2003-00132 - HANK JONG - A request to amend
the General Plan Land Use Designation from Very Low Residential
( 1-2 dwelling units per acre) to Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units
per acre), to be consistent with the surrounding neighborhood, for
2 8 acres of land located east of Hermosa Avenue on the south side
of Wilson Avenue -APN 0201-182-03, 04, 05, and 06 Related
File Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16421 Staff has prepared a
Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration
This action will be forwarded to the City Council for final action and
the date of the Public Hearing before City Council will be separately
noticed
•
•
•
Page 2
•
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16090 - RICHARD DICK
ASSOCIATES - A Tentative Parcel map to subdivide a 3 6 acre
parcel into 2 parcels ranging in size from 1 9 acre (Parcel 1) to
1 7 acre (Parcel 2) in the Mixed Use District (Subarea 18), located
on the southwest corner of Azusa Court and Anaheim Place -
APN 0209-272-21 On June 1, 1994, an Environmental Impact
Report (State Clearinghouse No 93102055) was prepared and
certified by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as a
Program Environmental Impact Report for the Rancho Cucamonga
IASP Subarea 18 Specific Plan The California Environmental
Quality Act provides that once a Program Environmental Impact
Report has been certified, no further Environmental Impact Report or
Negative Declaration is regwred for subsequent protects within the
scope of the Program Environmental Impact Report
VI. PUBLIC COMMENTS
This ~s the Gme and place for the general public to address the commission Items
to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda
VII. COMMISSION BUSINESS
•
G TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an
11 00 p m adjournment time If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard
only with the consent of the Comm~ss~on
1, Gail Sanchez, Planning COmmISSIOn Secretary of the Cdy of Ranchc
Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the
foregoing agenda was posted on Apnl 17, 2003, at least 72 hours pnor to the
meeting per Government Code Section 54964 2 at 10500 Civic Center Dnve,
Rancho Cucamonga
,O<-i.~~., ~
Page 3
Vicinity Map
Planning Commission
F
~,E SPHERE OF INFLUENCE
x }
~ ~ I E a
(HILLSIDE ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '
1 ~_ ~ _ WILSON ~ }~ !,, ~_'
I m ;.~ .~ ~ p$\ .~
' / •
i
+
_~
C
e
,i
S ,
April 23, 2003
~~19TH
- - --~
.. ~ > __ J U
W Q ~_~! .~
2 =__ -~ ~"
---
O vZ-
~-- '-S --
A and
~- City Hall
City of Rancho Cucamonga
~'
°~ .,
~,~~' BASE LINE
B and D
Z ~ _ FOOTHILL
" _ -ARROW
y
Q W
O
Q 6TH
W 4TH
a.
APRIL 23, 2003
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA INDEX
ITEM NO. ITEM TITLE PAGES
A ends 2 - 4
A - C Environmental Assessment & Development 5 - 6
Review DRC2002-00751
Environmental Assessment & Tentative Pracel
Ma SUBTPM16009
B - D Environmental Assessment & Development 7 - 8
Review DRC2002-00750
Environmental Assessment & Tentative Parcel
Ma SUBTPM16010
E Environmental Assessment & General Plan 9 - 45
Amendment DRC2003-00132
F Tentative Parcel Ma SUBTPM16090 46 - 61
G Trails Adviso Committee A ointments 62
T H E C I T Y O F
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
StaffReport
DATE: April 23, 2003
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commisslon
FROM. Brad Buller, Clty Planner
BY: Warren Morelion, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT• ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
SUBTPM16009 - RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION -The subdivision of
4.86 acres of land Into 4 parcels in the General Industrial District (Subarea 13),
located at the southeast corner and southwest corner of 6th Street and Charles
Smith Avenue - ARN• 229-263-05 and 229-283-04 and 05
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
DRC2002-00751 - RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION -The development
of four Industnal buildings totaling 54,662 square feet on 4 86 acres of land In the
General Industrial Distract (Subarea 13), located at the southeast corner and
southwest corner of 6th Street and Charles Smith Avenue - APN: 229-263-05
and 229-283-04 and 05
BACKGROUND. The Item was originally scheduled for the December 11, 2002, Planning
Commisslon meeting At the request of the applicant, the item was continued four times
(December 11, 2002, January 8, 2003, February 26, 2003, and March 26, 2003) until April 23,
2003, in order to address the limits of off-site public improvements associated with the protect.
The applicant has submitted another letter requesting the Item be continued again to the May
14, 2003, meeting because he is still In negotiations with the Engineering Division to resolve
outstanding Issues (Exhibit "A").
RECOMMENDATION. Staff recommends the Planning Commission continue Tentative Parcel
Map SUBTPM16009 and Development Review DRC2002-00751 to May 14, 2003
Respectf ly submitted,
r r
Brad Buller
City Planner
BB.WM/Is
Attachments Exhibit "A" - Letter dated April 15, 2003, requesting a fifth continuance to May
14, 2003
ITEMS A & C
Sent By: Planning Research Int'1.; 714 505 ]1370; Apr-15-03 4:34PM;
Development
Page 212
v1A HACSrnill.r
~~o9~a77-zsa7
April 15, 2003
Mr Brad Buller
Planning /)rrecmr
CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA
10500 Civic. Cenler Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 _-
lte: DRC2002-00750 Xt 00751 / SUBTPM-16009 &c 1GU10
Applications For'Irvo Industrial Park Projects, "The Vineyards Exsl" and "'1'hc
Vineyards Wesl", On '('hc East and West Sides of I-13 On The South Side of 6°i Street.
Rear Brad•
Pursuant to our discussion yesterday, please contittuc the above referenced applications uut~l the May
14, 2003 Planning Commission meeting
Please let ntc know if you have any questions
Thank you for your help m this matter
Ve truly you/rs,
Richard K. Wagner
cc Warren Mnrelion
Ccmnie Wxgriei Davidson
Caro! Plowman
~, C ~.
n,
LJ
PO. Box 3724 • 'I uatut, CA 92781-37J4 • i1SA tLl. (714) 505-1575 fax (714) 505.16'0
Exhibit '%9"
•
T H E C I T Y O F
RA~,,N,~C[HTO CU~C.{AMONGA
SlC1Ll 1~1 L - -
DATE: April 23, 2003
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM• Brad Buller, City Planner _-
BY Warren Morelion, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
SUBTPM16010 - RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION -The subdivision of
7.4 acres of land into 5 parcels in the General Industrial District (Subarea 14),
located at the southeast comer of 6th Street and the I-15 Freeway -
APN 229-283-08, 10, and 11
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
DRC2002-00750 - RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION -The development
of 5 industrial buildings totaling 117,790 square feet on 7.4 acres of land in the
General Industrial District (Subarea 14), located at the southeast corner of
6th Street and the I-15 Freeway - APN: 229-283-08, 10, and 11.
BACKGROUND The item was originally scheduled for the December 11, 2002, Planning
Commission meeting At the request of the applicant, the item was continued four times
(December 11, 2002, January 8, 2003, February 26, 2003, and March 26, 2003) until April 23,
2003, in order to address the limits of off-site public improvements associated with the project
The applicant has submitted another letter requesting the item be continued again to the May
14, 2003, meeting because he is still in negotiations with the Engineering Division to resolve
outstanding issues (Exhibit "A")
RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission continue Tentative Parcel
Map SUBTPM16010 and Development Review DRC2002-00750 to May 14, 2003
Respecttu ubmitted,
Brad Bu r
City Planner
BB WM/Is
Attachments Exhibit "A" - Letter dated April 15, 2003, requesting a fifth continuance to May
14, 2003
ITEMS B & D
Sent By: Planning Research Int'1.; 714 505 1870; Apr•15-03 4:34PM; Page 2/2
VIA FACSIMILE
(904)477-2847
April 15, 2003
Mr Brad Bullet
!'lanning /)rrecMr
CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA
1 Os00 Civic Gaoler Drive
]tancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Re: DRC2002-00750 & 00751 / SUBTPM-16009 & 1G010
Applications For'Irva IndusMal Park Projects, "The VinevaLd_Eggl" acrd "'1'hc
Vineva s R'esl", On'fhc East sad West Sides of I-15 On The South Side of 6°i Strcet.
Dear Brad:
Pursuant to ow discusciun yesterday, please contimic the above referenced appl~~at~uns until the May
14, 2003 Planning Commission meeting.
Please let me know if you have any ques'uons
Thank you for your help m this mattes
V~ours~
Richard K. Wagner
cc' Warren Mnrelion
C~rmnie Wagner Davidson
Carol Plowman
Fxti ~b~ ~ PO. Box 3724 • 'A'ustin, C~78~7~ )SA • ~t• (714) 505-1575 • fax (7141505.1670
>~
C~
T H E C I T Y O F
RANCHO CHCAMONGA
Staff Report
DATE Apn123,2003
TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM Brad Buller, City Planner
BY Emily Wimer, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
DRC2003-00132 -HANK JONG - A request to amend the General Plan Land
Use Designation from Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) to Low
Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) to be consistent with the surrounding
neighborhood, for 2 8 acres of land located east of Hermosa Avenue on the
south side of Wilson Avenue - APN 0201-182-03, 04, 05, and O6 Related File
Tentative Tract Map 16421
BACKGROUND The protect was originally submitted on December 10, 2002, with a submittal
to subdivide the property The applicant was informed that the General Plan land use was not
consistent and a General Plan Amendment was necessary On February 6, 2003, the applicant
submitted an application for a General Plan Amendment to change the land use to Low
Residential The applicant's intention is to develop eight single-family homes on the 2.8-acre
property. Once the General Plan Amendment has been approved, the applicant will continue
with the Development Review of the property
PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION
A Project Density The application is a request to change the General Plan land use to Low
Residential, which would permit a slightly higher density of the subtect site The subtect
site was rezoned Very Low Residential in the last General Plan update, however, staff
believes this was not consistent with the established neighborhood on the south side of
Wilson Avenue All surrounding properties are zoned Low Residential and average 130 to
150 feet in depth, similar to the lot depths the applicant would be providing Under Very
Low Residential, the lot depth minimum is 200 feet, which could not be accomplished with
the street and improvements
B Surroundino Land Use and Zoning
North - Single-family homes/ Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling unts per acre)
•
South - Single-family homes/Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre)
East - Single-family homes/Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre)
West - Hermosa Elementary School/Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre)
ITEM E
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
GPADRC2003-00132 - HANK JONG
Apnl 23, 2003
Page 2
C. General Plan Desionations:
Protect Site -Very Low Residential (.1-2 dwelling units per acre)
North -Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre)
South - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre)
East -Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre)
West -School
D. Site Charactenstics: The site is vacant and relatively flat with mammal slope of
approximately 2 to 4 percent. The site is rectangular in shape with ruderal grasses, earth
piles, and rocks on-site There are no structures on the site
ANALYSIS:
A. General The applicant is requesting to change the land use designation on a 2.8-acre
site (2 3 acres net) from Very Low Residential (.1-2 dwelling units per acre) to Low
Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) to make the area consistent with the existing
surrounding zoning and land use. The maximum lots allowed would increase from 2 to 4
lots per acre The current land use designation would not allow the development to be
subdivided at a higher density unless a General Plan Amendment is approved.
B Approonateness of the Existing Very Low Residential Land Use: Low density residential is •
the existing character of the area generally south of Wilson Avenue, between Hermosa
and Haven Avenues The surrounding designations are Low Residential (2-4 dwelling
units per acre) on all four sides Retention of the Very Low Residential Distract would not
prowde a continuation of the lot size, layout, or density compared to the surrounding land
uses In addition, the minimum lot depth would be difficult to achieve with street
improvements (30 feet from the center line) necessary for the construction of the tract and
a minimum lot depth of 200 feet (total dimension of the property is 198 feet).
C Aooropr.ateness of the Proposed Low Residential Land Use Low Residential (2-4
dwelling units per acre) is the predominate designation in the area and generally located
on all four sides of the property. Redesignating the property as Low Residential would
allow development consistent with the neighborhood in terms of lot size, layout, and
density
D Environmental Assessment Parts I and Part II of the Initial Study have been completed
and determined that a protect designed and developed under Low Residential (2-4
dwelling units per acres) land use as outlined above would not have a significant adverse
environmental impact Further environmental issues will need to be analyzed when a
formal development proposal is submitted in the future for the site
CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Vallev Daily
Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners
within a 300-foot radius of the protect site
~a
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
GPADRC2003-00132 - HANK JONG
April 23, 2003
• Page 3
RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planrnng Commission recommend approval
of General Plan Amendment DRC2003-00132 to the City Council through adoption of the
attached Resolution of Approval
Respectfully submitted,
Brad duller
City Planner
BB EW~ma
Attachments• Exhibit "A" -General Plan Land Use Map
Exhibit "B" -Site Location Map
Exhibit "C" -Initial Study Parts I and II
Draft Resolution of Approval for General Plan Amendment DRC2003-00132
~3
EXISTING GENERAL PLAN
0 SUBJECT SITE
0 VERY LOW
® LOW
~~~ LOW MEDIUM
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
0 OPEN SPACE ~~
~ich~bi-~~~A~,
~~ ~
~~ ~~ ~~
800 0 800 1600 Feet
~~
0 SUBJECT SITE
„ VICINITY MAP
~ E,~~e~. a,•
~i
~~
L- y ENVIRONMENTAL
- INFORMATION FORM
(Part I -Initial Study)
car arse~o cuAn~ (Pkue type orpdM clearly uslrp krk. Use tla 6D key to move from one fine to dre next Me.)
Plamrg Onision
reo9) ma~so
INCOMPLE7EAPPUCA710NSWILLNOTBEPROCESSED. Please ratetltarlllsfheresponsiWfi(yaffheappfx,~aMmensurefhat
me application !s oomp/ete at the trine a submr@al, cdy stall wul not be available m perform wlorlr required ro proNde Mssing
btfonnabon.
App/icabon Number for the proyect to which tias (onn pertains: TM No .1 6 4 21
PrgedTaYe: 8 Units Single Family House
NamedAddmsso/proiectowner(s)• Shone Wang •
3675 E. Huntington Dr., #215, Pasadena,~CA 91107
Name d Address of developer or prged sponsor
Contact Person d Address
Name d Address of person pnpanng thrs /orm (d ddierent /rom above)• Hank Jong
11823 Slauson Ave.,Unit 18, Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670
Telephone Number (562)945-0689 /
EnhronmentallnfoFonnl doc Page 7 ~f Created on 5/22/2002 4 09 PM
r ,
LJ
Inlamration indicated by an astedsk (7 k not required ofnon-construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by stall.
'1) Prevrde a lull scale (6-1/2 x 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which indudes the projed sde, and Indicate
the sde boundaries
2) Provide a set o/oobr photographs that show representative views into the sde /rom the rwrUi, south, east and west,
views L and from the site hom the primary access pdnts that serve the sde, and representaGw views o/
slgnlfrcant features r(,~m the sde. Include a map showing bcaGon o/ eadi phdogreph. '
3) Projed Locatran (desuibe): The pro3 act location is in a very low
residential area. At present, this is a vacant land.
I) Assessor's Parcel Numbers (aHadi addrGonal sheet H necessary):
# 0201-182-03, 0201-182-04, 0201-182-05, 0201-182-06
'S) GrossSdeArea(adsq ftp 2.8 acres
~) Net Site Area (total sde size nunus area of public streets 6 proposed
dedreatronsJ.
. 2.3 acres
n Describe any Proposed general plan amendment or zone change which wuu/d aHed the prged slte
(attach addrbona/ sheet Hnecessary).
N/A
8) Indude a descnptron o1 all pemutr which will be necessary Gorri the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other
governmental agenaes rn order to tally implement the prged-
N/A
9) Describe the physical settrng of the sde as d exists before the prged mdudmg rnlormatron on topography, sod
stabifrty, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drernage courses, and scenic aspeds. Describe any
ex~sGng sWdures on sde (mdudmg age and conddron) and the use o/ the strudures Attach photographs o/
srgnrficant /eatures described In adddron, cde all sources of rnformaGon (i e , gedog~cal and/or hydrologic studies,
brotrc and archedog~cal surveys, tratTc studies)
The subjected land currently is a vacant lot. Within the lot, there
• are no mature trees but some bushes, weeds and grass. There are
some earth piles and rocks at the site. Topographically, the site
is relatively flat. Soil instabilities are not exoecta_r3 h„t ~;i~
EnhronmentallnfoFonn7 doc Page 2 E ~ Created on 5/22/2002 4 09 PM
~~ . ~--
be evaluated )r the geotechnical engineer'here are no trails
and roads, drainage courses and secnic aspects are observed at the
site.
•
f0) Descrrbe the Hawn arltura/ and/or hrstoncal aspects o/ the sJte. Crte ad sources of rntomiabon (hooks. Published
reports and oral hrstoryJ.
N/A
•
11) Describe any nose sources and fherr levels that now abed the srle (arraaft, roadway raise, etc.) and how they wdl
alfed proposed uses
N/A
12) Describe the proposed prged In detail. This should provide en adequate descnptan o/the sHe In terms of uRrmate
use that will result horrr the proposed project. Indicate d there are proposed phases for deve/opmen4 the extent of
development to occur with each phase, and the anbdpated completion of each increment. Attach addrtronal sheet(s)
l/necessary~
Eight units single family houses will be built in the subjected
lot.
•
EnhronmentallnfoFOnn1 doc Page 3 ~ O Created on 5f22/2002 4 09 PM
,-
~ t
13) Desaibe the surroundng properbes,lndudmg !n/ormatron on plants and animals end any wlturel, hlstoncal, or
acenk aspects Indicate the type d land use (residential, commercial, eta), Imenslly o/land use (one-lanu7y;
apartrnent houses, shops, department stores, etc.) and scale of development (heigh4 homage, setback, rear yard,
ek.):
There are no any cultural, historical or scenic aspects nearby,
The north side of the site is another vacant land. The west side
of the site is a school, and the south side of the side are
some single family houses. The remaining side is faced to the
drive way.
1~) W7! Ure proposed project change the pattern, scale or dlarecter o/the surtounding general area d the project?
The proposed project will improve the character of the
surrounding area.
15) Indicate the type d shat-term and longterm nose to be generated. inducting source and amount Flow wrp these
horse levels aged ad%aoent properties and on-site uses What methods o1 soundproofing are proposed?
'16) lndicete proposed removals and/or replacements d mature or scenic bees.
N/A
1 ~ /ndrcete any bodies o/ water (mdud~ng domestic water supplies) into which the site drams.
N/A
Environmentalln(oFortnl doc Page 4 ~ 9 Created on 522/2002 4 09 PM
18) Indicate expected amourrt o/water usage (See Attachment A /or usage estimates). For IurUrer clarification, please
contad the Cucamonga County Water District at 987-2591.
a. Residential (gaUday) 4 , 80 0.00 p~k use (9a~y) 9 , 6 0 0.00
6. Commerdal/Ind (gaUday/ac) Peak use (gaUmiNac)
19) Indicate proposed method o/sewage disposal ^ Septic Tank ^ Sewer.
N septic tanks era proposed, aftadr percolation tests Hdischarge to a sanitary sewage system 1s proposed Indicate
expelled dally sewage generation' (See AHachmerd A (or usage estimates). For further danfiption, please cooled
the Cucamorga County Water Drstnd at 987-2591.
e. Residential (gaUday) 2, 1 6 0 .0 b
b. CommerGaUlndustiial (gaUday/ac)
RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS:
Zo) Numbero/resldentialunHs• 8
to (rndlcate range o/ parcel sties, mnimum tit she-6nd maximum kit she:
Minium lot size: 10,7725F
Maximum lot size: 18,754 SF
Range: 18754-10772=7,982 SF
Attached (mdicate whetherunds are rental or /or sale uruts)•
21) Antrppatedrengeo/saleprrcesarrd/orrents. Depends on the future market
Sale Pnce(s) S to S
Rent (per month) S ro S
~1 Spedly number of bedreoms by unk type. N / A
23) Indicate antrapated household size by and type•
Single Family Type
EnvironmenfalfntoFonnt doc
~~~
Page 5
Created on 51222002 4 09 PM
. ~' __ ~.
24) Indicate fhe expected number o/schod children who will be rosrdmg wrfhln fhe proled: Corded fhe appropriate
Scholl D~strrds as shown !n Allachment B.
. a. Elementary. _
b. JunlorHigh: _
c SenrorH~gh
COMMERCIAL. INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS
25) Describe (ype o/ use(s) and mapr tuncbon(s) of commercial, industrial a InsMubona/ uses:
Z6) Total floor area o/ carrunerdal, urdusfial, or msbhrbonal uses by type.
27) Indicate hours o/operation.
28) Numberolemployees•
Total•
Maximum Shift.
Tune o/Maxrmum Shl2
29) ProNde breakdown o/anbdpated)ob dassrficatans, krdudmg wage and salary ranges, as well as an Indication of the
rate of hire for each dassrficabon (attach addrbona/ sheet Hnecessary)
•
30) Estimation o1 fhe number o/workers to He hued that currently n:srde rn the
~Y
'31) Forcommercral andlndustnal uses only, indicate the source, type and amount o/arrpolubon emissions. (Data should
be verified through the Soufh Coasf Arr Qualdy Management Orstnd, at (818) 572-6283)
~~
EnwronmentallnfoFOnnt doc
Page 6
Created on 5/222002 4 09 PM
_, ,
l:,
ALL PROJECTS
32) Have fire water, sewer, fire, and flood corrbol agerrdes serving the project been confaded to determine their ability to
provide adequate semce to the proposed project? M so, please indicate their msponse. .
No.
33J !n the known history of this properly, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic
matenals7 Examples o/hazardous and/or toxic matedals rndude, but are not GrNted to PCB's; radroactrwa substances,
pesbddes and herbicides, /eels, oils, solverds, and other flammable bquids and gases. Also note underground storage
ofeny d the above Please list the mefedals and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, es we9
as fhe dates o/use, Hknown.
No.
34) Ltrdl the proposed pro/erX involve the temporary ar bng-term use, storage or discharge d hazardous and/or toxic
matenals, including but not bmrted to those examples fisted above? M yes, provide an brventory of all such matena/s to
be used and proposed method of disposal. The bcatron of such uses, akxrg wrdr the storage and shipment areas,
shall be shown and labeled on the application plans
No.
I hereby certrly that the statements fumished above and /n the attached exhlbks present the data and inlomrabon required for
adequate evaluation o/this project to the best o/myabdity, thatthe /acts, statements, and inlarrrration presented are true end correct
tot he best ofmy knowledge and belie/ I further understand that additional inlomrabon may be requued to be su6mdted belore en
adequate evaluation ca/n be made by the Cdy of Rancho Cucamonga.
Date: ~14 1 ° ~ Sisnature.
Tdle: GE, RG, CEG
•
~a
EnhmnmenUllnfoFonnl clot Page 7 Created on 5/22x2002 4'09 PM
•
PROJECT ADDRESS.
1 X913 1(1917 WII SnN AVF RANCHn Cl1CAMf7NGA CA 91737
G~3
PHOTO 1: EXISTING VACANT LOT AT THE PROJECT SITE.
(VIEWING SOUTH FROM WILSON AVE.)
f`.J
U
~~ /
PHOTO 2: WEST PART OF THE EXISTING VACANT LOT AT THE
PROJECT SITE (ADJACENT TO A SCHOOL)
(VIEWING WEST FROM THE PROJECT SITE)
r~
m_ .~»,-_w_ ._~~; _,-,~_ ~~, ~ f_,, n - ,. - --
~/5
PHOTO 3' NORTH PART OF THE EXISTING VACANT LOT AT THE
PROJECT SITE (ADJACENT TO ANOTHER VACANT LOT)
(VIEWING NORTH FROM THE PROJECT SITE)
PROJECT SITE (ADJACENT TO A DRIVE WAIF.
(VIEWING EAST FROM THE PROJECT SITE)
~~~
PHOTO 4 : EAST PART OF THE EXISTING VACANT LOT AT THE
e KT'S t = ^~ .4 F T _'_I' ~. ti
5%r'hJr '' ^}..sue r-~4 may' ~~~.._ '~G..... ~~X ~_ _ _
s~~ _ _ ~y'v .`1 _
~~~
PHOTO 5: SOUTH PART OF THE EXISTING VACANT LOT AT THE
PROJECT SITE (ADJACENT TO SOME SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES).
(VIEWING SOUTH FROM THE PROJECT SITE)
City of Rancho Cucamonga
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
INITIAL STUDY PART II •
BACKGROUND
1. Project File: General Plan Amendment DRC2003-00132
2. Related Files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16421
3. Description of Project. A request to amend the General Plan Land Use Designation to
Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) from Very Low Residential (.1-2 dwelling
units per acre) on 2.8 acres of land located east of Hermosa Avenue, south of Wilson
Avenue - APN. 0201-182-03, 04, 05, and O6.
4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address:
Hank Jong
11823 Slauson Avenue, Unit 18
Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670
5. General Plan Designation: Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling urnts per acre)
6. Zoning: Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre)
7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The site is vacant and contains mature trees,
shrubs and grasses Earth piles and rocks are located on the site. The site is relatively
flat There are no trails, roads or drainage courses on-site Surrounding uses are
mainly single-family homes to the north, south, and east, and Hermosa Elementary
School along the west property line
8. Lead Agency Name and Address:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Droiswn
10500 Civic Center Dnve
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
9. Contact Person and Phone Number:
Emily Wimer
(909)477-2750
10. Other agencies whose approval is required: None
•
~~O
~~
Initial Study for
GPA DRC2003-00132
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 2
The envvonmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this pro)ect, Involving
at least one Impact that Is "Potentially Slgrnficant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless
Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Slgnlflcant Impact" as Indicated by the checklist on the
following pages
(/) Land Use and Planning () TransportatioNCirculation ()public Services
/ Po ulabon and Housn ()Biological Resources
( ) p g ()Energy and Mineral Resources () Utildies and Service Systems
(/) Geological Problems (/) Hazards (/) Aesthetics
(/) Water (/) Noise (/) Cultural Resources
(/) Air t]uahly Mandato Findin s of S mticance ORecreation
DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared
(/) I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the
environment. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
Signed V
Emily er
Assistant Planner
March 26, 2003
E/9
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
GPA DRC2003-00132 Page 3
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Pursuant to Section 15063 of the Calrfomia Environmental Quality Act Gwdelines, an
explanation is required for all 'Potentially Significant Impact,' 'Potentially Significant Impact
Unless Mdigation Incorporated,' and 'Less Than Signirficant Impact' answers, including a
discussion of ways to mitigate the significant effects identified.
Issues and Supportng Information Sources: rowm~r
s
Na.a lass
va«ro.nr uN.e n~
s~v+ndm ~~ s ra
w
...... .
• • r..~... ai~c .+i~u ruvnrvinta. would the proposal:
a) Conflict v~nth general plan designation or zoning? () () (/) ( )
b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or () () () (/)
policies adopted by agencies with lunsdiction
over the protect?
c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the () () (/) ( )
vianity?
d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an () () () (/)
established community?
Comments:
a-d) The site is presently designated Very Low Residential The proposed amendment would
change the General Plan land use designation from Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling
units per acre) to Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre). The surrounding land
uses are Low Residential and consistent with the proposed amendment. Residential land
use is compatible with the adioining elementary school, which wdl serve the students
generated by development of the site.
Issues and Supporting Information Sources ~ ~r
~~b
9Wr~cam
~ inoen
umw
wapeem
loco ea tits
7ne„
9Wr~xam
i
No
i
~• rvruw~n,rvwvunVUSUVCi would the proposal:
a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local () () (/) ( )
population prolections~
b) Induce substantial growth in an area either () () () (/)
directly or indirectly (e.g., through protects in an
undeveloped area or extension of maior
infrastructure)?
c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable () () () (/)
housing
~~
Sao
•
Initial Study for
GPA DRC2003-00132
Comments:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 4
a-b) The proposed land use change would result in additional residents at the site.
Based on a maximum density allowed under Low Residential of 4 dwelling units per
acre a total of 11 single-family residential may be developed on-site. An increase in
population of 34.8 people (2 9 persons_ per dwelling units) could be generated by
the proposed land use change. The proposed land use is consistent with the
established neighborhood The property is already zoned Low Residential The
surrounding area is predominantly developed with single-family homes, the
exception being Hermosa Elementary School to the west. The protect will not
induce substantial growth in the area either directly or indirectly
c) The proposed protect will change the General Plan land use designation change
from Very Low Residential to Low Residential There are no residential structures
on-site The impact is not considered significant
Pnanhally
Issues and Supporting Information Sources ~q~h~nt
Inpep Lass
Pgtenhally Unless Than
Signihcent Mingauon Significant No
I an Inca rataE I act I an
3. GEOLOGIC PROBLE]NS. Would the proposal result m or
expose people to potential impacts ~nvolwng
a) Fault ruptures () () (/) ( )
b) Seismic ground shakings () () (/) ( )
c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefactions () () (/) ( )
d) Seiche hazards? () () () (/)
e) Landslides or mudflows~ () () () (/)
f) Erosion, changes in topography, or unstable soil () () () (/)
conditions from excavation, grad:~g, or fill
g) Subsidence of the lands () () () (/)
h) Expansive soils O O O (/)
i) Unique geologic or physical features () () (/) ( )
Comments
a-c-i)According to the City's General Plan, the site does not occur within the State
designated Earthquake Fault Zone nor within the City's adopted Earthquake Fault
Zone for the Red Hill Fault Prior to development of the site under either the
existing land use designation of Very Low Residential or the proposed land use
designation of Low Residential, the applicant would be required to provide
appropriate reports/studies to the satisfaction of the Building Official
d) The protect site is not located near a body of water
jai
Initial Study for
GPA DRC2003-00132
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 5
e-f) The site slopes at approximately 4 percent from north to south. No standing or
ponding water was observed during a recent visit to the site. A Grading Plan will be
required, prior to site development as well as the design of proper drainage and
building pad areas.
g-h) Soil type on-site and in the vicinity is the Soboba Stony and Soboba Gravelly serves.
The Soboba serves consists of somewhat excessively drained, nearly level to
moderately sloping sods formed on alluvial fans in granitic alluvium. These soils are
very rapidly permeable. Runoff is very slow and the hazard of water erosion slight.
The City's General Plan indicates that most sod types in the City are very adaptable
to land development and are not of an expansive nature
PoleMielly
Issues and Supporting Information Sources a~fi~^I
Irtpect Less
PoteMielly UMess 7Ten
Sigrufirant MNpenon $IQlI~fiCel11 No
I IritO r~ee 1 acY I
4. WATER. Wdl the proposal result gyn.
a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, () () () (/)
or the rate and amount of surface water runoff?
b) Exposure of people or property to water related () () () (/)
hazards such as flooding
c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration () () () (/)
of surface water quality (e.g., temperature,
dissolved oxygen, or turbidity)?
d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any () () () (/)
water body
e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction () () () (/)
of water movements
f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either () () () (/)
through direct additions or withdrawals, or
through interception of an aquifer by cuts or
excavations, or through substantial loss of
groundwater recharge capability
g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater () () () (/)
h) Impacts to groundwater quality
i) Substantial reduction in the amount of ( )
groundwater otherwise available for public water
supplies
Comments
O (/) O
O O (/)
a) Development of the site under the existing land use designation of Very Low
Residential or under the proposed designation of Low Residential would result in
changes in absorption rates and drainage patterns The site slopes gently from
Eaa
•
Initial Study for
GPA DRC2003-00132
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 6
north to south at an approximate 4 percent gradient. The City Engineer must
approve a drainage study, indicating how storm water will be directed to the existing
storm drains in the immediate area, prior to issuance of grading permits
A final Grading Plan will be prepared in accordance with City standards to show
how storm water runoff will be handled both dunng construction and
post-construction Approval of Grading Plans and conditions applied to the protect
by the City Engineer to ensure adequate site drainage and adherence to Best
Management Practices (BMPs) identified in the Storm Water Pollution Prevention
Plan (SWPPP) wdl result in a less than significant impact
b) Development of the site under the existing land use designation of Very Low
Residential or the proposed land use designation of Low Residential would not
expose people to flood related hazards as the site is outside of the 100-year flood
plain.
L~
c-e) The prolect site is not located near any body of water, therefore, development of the
site under the existing land use designation of Very Low Residential or under the
proposed designation of Low Residential would not result in changes to surface
water quality, the amount of surface water in any water body, or changes in
currents, or the course or direction of water movements. The applicant will provide
a drainage study showing how storm water runoff wdl be conveyed both dunng
grading/construction and once the site is developed and occupied, pnor to issuance
of a grading permit
f-i) Development of the site would not involve deep trenches or excavation and
therefore would have no impact on the direction or course of groundwater The
prolect would not come in contact with groundwater or impact ground water quality
•
PMenimlly
Issues and Supporting Information Sources si0runcent
Inpaq Less
Potentially Unless 711en
$igniticant Mitigation Sipnhcant No
I act Inco rated I ect I act
5. AIR DUALITY. Would the proposal
a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to () () (/) ( )
an existing or protected air quality violation
b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants () () (/) ( )
c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or () () () (/)
cause any change in climate
d) Create obtectionable odors () () () (/)
Comments
a-b) The change in land use from Very Low Residential to allow for Low Residential wdl
have a negligible change in emissions or pollutants The City's 2001 General Plan
analyzed air quality impacts of residential development using South Coast Air Quality
Management District (SCAQMD) thresholds Development of the site under the
existing land use designation of Very Low Residential would yield a maximum of
~a3
Initial Study for
GPA DRC2003-00132
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 7
5 homes versus under the proposed designation of Low Residential would yield a
maximum of 11 homes; therefore, the difference is minimal. The impact of 6 more
homes under the proposed land use designation is less than signrficant.
c-d) Development of the site under the existing land use designation of Very Low
Residential or under the proposed designation of Low Residential would not generate
emissions that could cause climatic changes or objectionable odors.
Ptrttmaally
Issues and Supporting Information Sources ~~~
Irtpa,1 Lmv
Paena>uq unites roan
SiptufiraM ekapason Siydficant No
I act Inco tad I act 1
6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the
proposal result rn:
a) Increased vehicle tops or traffic congestion? () () (/) ( )
b) Hazards to safety from design features (e g , () () () (/)
sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e g ,farm equipment)
c) Inadequate emergency access or access to () () () (/)
nearby uses
d) Insufficient parking capaaty on-site or off-sites O O (/) ( )
e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicychsts~ O O O (/)
f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting () () () (/)
alternative transportation (e g., bus turnouts,
bicycle racks)
g) Rail or air traffic impacts O O O (/)
Comments
a) Site Plans would be regwred at the time of plan submittal and would be evaluated
based upon Municipal Code regwrements to install missing street improvements
Conditions of approval would adequately address the street improvements
necessary to accommodate project traffic In addition, the applicant would be
responsible for paying the City traffic impact fees and improving the project's
frontage along Wilson Avenue The applicant will pay traffic impact fees that
amount to the project's fair share of roadway improvements as identified by the City
Engineer Development of the site under the existing land use designation of Very
Low Residential would yield a maximum of 5 homes versus under the proposed
designation of Low Residential would yield a maximum of 11 homes; therefore, the
difference would be 6 more homes under the proposed land use designation The
ITE associates a trip rate of 12.57 trips per day per dwelling unit Development
under the existing land use designation of Very Low Residential would generate
approximately 62 85 trips per day The proposed designation of Low Residential
would generate approximately 138 27 trips per day. Based upon this trip rate, the
proposed amendment would generate a net increase of 75 42 trips per day. Being
~a~
•
•
CJ
r1
L..J
initial Study for
GPA DRC2003-00132
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 8
adjacent to an elementary school means that actual vehicle trips will be lower as
some children walk to school. The impact is less than significant
b-c) Site plans would be regwred at the time of plan submittal and would be evaluated
based on regwrements of the City's Development Code for safety hazards and
design features The on-site arculation system would be regwred to meet all
current Fire Department standards for emergency access
d) At the time of plan submittal, the applicant would be regwred to provide a Site Plan
depicting the location and number of garage structures and driveways A minimum
of two covered parking spaces is regwred for all single-family homes. This would
not be considered a significant impact
e-f) The proposed zone change wtll not cause a hazard or barrier to pedestrians or
cyclists as adequate points of ingress and egress will be reviewed at the time of
Tract submittal No bus turnouts are proposed since Wilson Avenue does not have
a bus route
g) Located approximately 6 miles north of the Ontario Airport, the site is northerly of
the flight path and would not impact users of aircraft
•
Potentially
Issues and Supporting Information Sources stQn~npanl
Impact Less
Potentially Unless Then
Signil¢am Mrtigauon SiOnd¢ant No
Impact Inco rated I act I acY
7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal
result in impacts to.
a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their () () () (/)
habitats (including, but not limited to. plants, fish,
insects, animals, and birds)
b) Locally designated species (e.g ,heritage trees, () () (/) ( )
eucalyptus windrow, etc )~
c) Locally designated natural communities (e g , () () () (/)
eucalyptus grove, sage scrub habitat, etc )~
d) Wetland habitat (e g ,marsh, riparian, and () () () (/)
vernal pool)
e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors () () () (/)
Comments
•
a-c) The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on
the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Exhibit IV-3 Based on previous
development surrounding the site, residential development and adjacent streets, it
is unlikely that any endangered or rare species would inhabit the site
~a5
Initial Study for
GPA DRC2003-00132
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 9
b) There are a few Eucalyptus trees on the property that meet the City's criteria as
heritage trees. Site Plans would be required at the time of plan submittal and would
be evaluated based on requirements of the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance.
Any heritage tree removal would require application for, and approval of, a Tree
Removal Permit and replacement planting.
d) There are no wetland habitats on the site
e) The site is vacant with surrounding development of single-family homes. This
development has eliminated any wildlife corridors that may have traversed the site
in the past.
Potenbally
Issues and Supporting Information Sources sgrafium
Inpact Leas
Potanbally Unless rnan
Siprvfirsnt Abbpebtn SOn~fiGent No
I n Intro etl I n I
8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the
proposal
a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation () () () (/)
plans
b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and () () () (/)
ineffiaent manner
c) Result in the loss of availability of a known () () () (/)
mineral resource that would be of future value to
the region and the residents of the State?
Comments
a-b) The protect would be required to conform to applicable City standards for energy
conservation.
c) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the
City General Plan, Figure IV-2 and TableIV-1, therefore, there is no impact
Potemielly
Issues and Supporting Information Sources as^~"~"
Inpact Leas
PWenually Unless rnen
Significant Mi6gabon Sipmbtant Na
I act Into retetl I an I as
9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve.
a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of () () () (/)
hazardous substances (including, but not limited
to oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)
b) Possible interference with an emergency () () () (/)
response plan or emergency evacuation plan
c) The creation of any health hazard or potential () () () (/)
health hazard
~a~
•
•
Initial Study for
GPA DRC2003-00132
•
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 10
Pnenaally
Issues and Supporting Information Sources saa"ant
Inpen Lela
Pnenaally unless 7nan
Significant aLagaoon Sigrvhcant No
I n Into teA I n I an
d) Exposure of people to existing sources of () () () (/)
potential health hazards?
e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable () () () (/)
brush, grass, or trees?
Comments
a-c-d) Development of the site in accordance with its existing designation of Very Low
Residential or under the proposed designation of Low Residential, would not
require the use of hazardous materials Observations at a recent site visit indicate
that the site is kept in a clean matter would no evidence of illegal dumping,
discarded drums, containers, hazardous wastes or discolored soils.
b) Once Site Plans are submitted they will be reviewed to ensure protect traffic would
not interfere with the flow of traffic along Wilson Avenue or with evacuation plans or
other emergency responses.
•
e) The protect site is located along the south side of Wilson Avenue The site and
areas to the east and south are developed and are within acommercial/residential
area The site is not located in a brush/wild land fire hazard area
Potenaally
Issues and Supporting Information Sources sigrvficant
Irryan Loss
Potenaally Unless Than
Significant MM1igaaon Sigmacant No
I an Inco 2iBE I as 1 an
10. NOISE. Will the proposal result m
a) Increases in existing noise levels () () (/) ( )
b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels () () () (/)
Comments
a) The primary existing noise source in the protect area are transportation corridors
Traffic along Wilson Avenue is the predominant source contributing to the ambient
noise level in the area The proposed General Plan Amendment to change the land
use designation from Very Low Residential to Low Residential would be compatible
with surrounding development Standard measures contained in the City's
Development Code will ensure construction noise will be at less than significant
levels The impact is considered less than significant
• b) According to City's General Plan Exhibit V-13, future noise levels associated with
traffic are below 60 dBA along Wilson Avenue Development of the site under the
proposed designation of Low Residential would not require a Noise Impact Analysis
Eat
Irntial Study for
GPA DRC2003-00132
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 11
vpl~~lw
Issues and Supporting Information Sources saurcam
Ins u>v
vrnemmlq umeu m~
Slplnficant A4tlpnEm SipNfitartl No
Impact Incpryoretetl Irtpacl Inpect
11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an
effect upon or result in a need for new or altered
government services in any of the following areas:
a) Fire protecUon~ O O O (/)
b) Police protections () ( ) () (/)
c) Schools? () ( ) () (/)
d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads () ( ) () (/)
e) Other governmental services () ( ) () (/)
Comments
a-e) Fire Protection -The protect site is located on the south side of Wilson Avenue east
of Hermosa Avenue The area is served by a fire station located on the north side
of 19th Street east of Amethyst Avenue. Standard Conditions of Approval of the
Uniform Bwlding and Fire Codes are placed upon protect approval
Police Protection - In accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General
Plan, the applicant will pay appropriate development impact fees as adopted by the
City Council
Schools -The proposed protect is a land use designation change from Very Low
Residential to Low Residential. The designation change would include an additional
student population from the site Based on a total of 11 single-family residential
homes, (maximum allowed under proposed Low Residential), a total of 5 students
would be generated within the Alta Loma School District (0.46 students per dwelling
unit), and 2 students would be generated within the Chaffey Joint Unified High
School District (0 20 students per dwelling unit) Together elementary/middle and
high school aged students would generate a total population of 7 students. The
applicant would be required to pay appropriate school impact fees.
Public Facilities/Services - In accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga
General Plan, the applicant would pay appropriate development impact fees as
adopted by the City Council
•
r1
LJ
CJ
~a8
Initial Study for
GPA DRC2003-00132
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 12
Potenuelly
Issues and Supporting Information Sources S9rvficant
bryaa Leas
Potentially Unless Ttlan
$ipnifitant ALtigahtM $igrnficam No
I ett Inw mteE I act I act
12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the
proposal result ~n a need for new systems or supplies
or substantial alterations to the following uttlities
a) Power or natural gas? () () () (/)
b) Communication systems () () () (/)
c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution () () () (/)
facdities~
d) Sewer or septic tanks? () () () (/)
e) Storm water drainage? () () () (/)
f) Solid waste disposals () () () (/)
g) Local or regional water supplies () () () (/)
Comments
a-g) Development of the site would not require major modification or alterations to the
existing utility infrastructure in the immediate area
Potenuelly
Issues and Supporting Information Sources Si9mfitant
Inpact Less
Potentially Unless Than
Sipmhcant Mnigahon Sigmhcant No
Im ect Inco oretee I act I act
13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal
a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highways () () () (/)
b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effects () () () (/)
c) Create light or glares () () (/) ( )
Comments
a-b) The site is located on the south side of Wilson Avenue and would be developed in
conformance with the landscape plans for Wtlson Avenue All structures on-site
must receive City of Rancho Cucamonga Design Review Committee approval, pnor
to protect approval
~~
c) Development of the site may increase the number of streetlights and security
lighting used in the immediate vicinity Because of the nature of the existing
residential development surrounding the site, the impacts of IighUglare will not be
signrficant
~a9
Initial Study for
GPA DRC2003-00132
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 13
Potetmally
Issues and Supporting Information Sources s~9~e
Inpop Less
Polentutlty UrJess 71ten
SipnOCaM A49pa9an 9prufiran No
I hco e0 I 1
14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal
a) Disturb Paleontological resources () () () (/)
b) Disturb archaeological resources? () () () (/)
c) Affect historical or cultural resources () () (/) ( )
d) Have the potential to cause a physical change, () () () (/)
which would affect unique ethnic cultural values
e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within () () () (/)
the potential impact area
Comments:
a-e) On October 17, 2001, the City Council certified an Environmental Impact Report
(State Clearinghouse No 2000061027) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga General
Plan Update The EIR preparation included record search conducted by the
Archaeological Information center at the San Bernardino County Museum on
March 6, 2000 No resources were Identified within the immediate vicinity of this
Protect. There is no substantial evidence that the Protect will have a sign;flcant
effect upon the cultural or historic resources. Although no cultural resources have
been observed on the site and on surrounding parcels, additional grading on the
site may expose or unearth historic cultural resources. The likelihood of unearthing
cultural resources is minimal and impacts are, therefore, considered to be less than
significant
Potaneelly
Issues and Supporting Information Sources sy~mca^t
Inpect Less
Paten9ally Unless man
Significant MNpa9on Significant No
I act Inro IateE 1 act I an
15. RECREATION. Would the proposal
a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or () () () (/)
regional parks or other recreational facilities
b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? () () () (/)
Comments
a) The proposed Protect is a land use designation change from Very Low Residential
to Low Residential The developer will be responsible for the payment of park fees
at the time of building permit issuance to offset any Impact on parks The Impact Is
not considered significant
~c.JO
Initial Study for
GPA DRC2003-00132
•
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 14
b) The proposed protect includes a land use designation change from Very Low
Residential to Low Residential. The land use surrounding the protect site is
designated residential and is developed
Paetmally
Issues and Supporting Information Sources so~fi=~^~
IiryecY I.ssa
Polanaally Unless 7Tan
$ipiufitant MNpeton SiOnifinant No
I oct Izro ted I act I ect
16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
a) Potential to degrade: Does the protect have the () () () (/)
potential to degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce the habitat of
a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, reduce the number or restrict the
range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or
eliminate important examples of the major
periods of California history or prehistory?
• b) Short term: Does the protect have the potential () Q (/) ( )
to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of
long-term, environmental goals (A short-term
impact on the environment is one that occurs in
a relatively beef, definitive period of time Long-
term impacts will endure well into the future )
c) Cumulative: Does the protect have impacts that () () (/) ( )
are individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable ("Cumulatively considerable"
means that the Intl emental effects of a protect
are considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past protects, the effects of
other current protects, and the effects of
probable future protects.)
d) Substantial adverse: Does the protect have () () () (/)
environmental effects, which will cause
substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly
Comments•
a) The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on
the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Exhibit IV-3 Based on previous
. residential/commercial development and streets, it is unlikely that any endangered
or rare species would inhabit the site
~~~
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
GPA DRC2003-00132 Page 15
b) The protect site is approximately 2.8 acres in size, and any grading would entail
establishing proper drainage and building pads. Development at the site would
result in dust and noise, which may be noticeable to existing residents in the
immediate area, significant impacts could be avoided through implementation of
erosion control and dust suppression measures identfied in Sections 4 and 5 of this
Initial Study.
c) If the proposed land use change were adopted, then the applicant would be
regwred to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga
General Plan. The General Plan Update was recently adopted along with the
certification of a Program EIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding
Consideration for signrficant adverse environmental effects of bwldout in the City
and Sphere of Influence. The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan
would result in significant adverse effects to air quality, the acoustical environment,
library services, and aesthetics and visual resources. Mitigation measures were
adopted for each of these resources; however they would not reduce impacts to
less than signrficant levels. As such, the City adopted Statements of Overriding
Consideration balancing the benefils of development under the General Plan
Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines
Section 15092 and 15096(h)). With these findings and Statements of Overriding
Consideration, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulatroe impacts is regwred
d) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause •
substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The Initial
Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a
potentially significant impact. Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce
emission levels Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term
and would cease once construction actmties were completed.
The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts assoaated with the
exposure of people to increased noise levels Noise impacts are at less than
significant levels
EARLIER ANALYSES
The effects identified above for this protect were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in
the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were
addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses
were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply).
(~) Rancho Cucamonga General Plan
(October 2001)
(~) Rancho Cucamonga Development Code •
(adopted December 7, 1983, revised June 1999)
E~
City of Rancho Cucamonga
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
The following Negative Declaration rs being circulated for public review m accordance with the
California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code.
Project File No.: General Plan Amendment DRC2003-00132
Public Review Period Closes: April 23, 2003
Project Name• Protect Applicant: Hank Jong
Project Location (also see attached map)• Located east of Hermosa Avenue on the south side of Wilson
Avenue - APN 0201-182-03, 04, O5, and 06
Project Description: A request to amend the General Plan Land Use Designation from Very Low Residential
( 1-2 dwelling units per acre) to Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre), to be consistent with the
surrounding neighborhood, for 2 8 acres of land Related Ftle Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16421
FINDING
This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an
Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is
proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following fmdmg•
® The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the protect may have a significant
effect on the environment
~ The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but
(1) Revisions ~n the protect plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this
proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or
mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and
(2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the protect as revised may have a
significant effect on the environment
If adapted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will riot be regwred
Reasons to support this finding are included m the attached Initial Study The protect file and all
related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at
10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847
NOTICE
The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period
r1
LJ
Date of Determination Adopted By
X33
RESOLUTION NO 03-67
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVALOF
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2003-00132, A CHANGE OF THE
GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL (1-2
DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW RESIDENTIAL (2-4 DWELLING
UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 2.8 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED EAST OF
HERMOSA AVENUE ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF WILSON AVENUE, AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0201-182-03, 04, 05,
AND O6
A Rentals
1 The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Development Code Amendment
DRC2003-00132, as descnbed in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the
subtect Development Code Amendment is referred to as 'Yhe application."
2 On the 23rd day of Apnl 2003, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and conGuded said heanng
on that date
3. All legal prerequisites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred
B Resolution
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows
1 This Commission hereby specfically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct
2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above-
referenced public heanng on Apnl 23, 2003, including wntten and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, this Commission hereby specfically finds as follows
a The application applies to property located within the City totaling approximately
2 B acres, basically a rectilinear configuration, located east of Hermosa Avenue on the south side of
Wilson Avenue and is presently vacant Said property is currently designated Very Low Residential
( 1-2 dwelling units per acre), and
b The properties to the north, south, east, and west are designated Low Residential
(2-4 dwelling units per acre) and are developed with single-family residential protects, except the
west abutting property which is developed as a school, and
c This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Polices of the General Plan
and will provide for the development within the distnct in a manner consistent with the General Plan
and with related development, and
d This amendment promotes the goals and obtectives of the Land Use Element, and
~~~
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 03-67
DRC2003-00132 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
HANKJONG
Page 2
e This amendment would not be materially m~unous or detrimental to the adtacent
properties and would not have a signficant impact on the environment nor the surrounding
properties.
3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2
above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows
a That the subtect property is swtable for the uses pemvtted in the proposed distnd in
terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use m the surrounding area, and
b That the proposed amendment would not have sigmficant impacts on the
environment nor the surrounding properties, and
That the proposed amendment is m conformance ninth the General Plan
4 Based upon the facts and information contained m the proposed Negative Declaration,
together ninth all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the
application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will
have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration attached hereto,
and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows
a That the Negative Declaration has been prepared m compliance with the California
Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA gwdel~nes promulgated
thereunder, that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the
independent tudgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and
considered the information contained m said Negative Declaration with regard to the application
b That based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into
the proposed protect, no significant adverse environmental effects moll occur
c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of
Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considering the record as a whole, the
Imt~al Study and Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed protect
wall have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife
depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained m the Negative Declaration, the
staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public
hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth m
Section 753 5(o-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations
5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth m paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby recommends approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2003-00132 to
change the General Plan Land Use Map for the subject properties to Low Residential (2-4 dwelling
units per acre) as shown in attached Exhibit "A "
6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF APRIL 2003
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
E.35
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 03-67
DRC2003-00132 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
HANKJONG
. Page 3
BY
Laity T McNiel, Chairman
ATTEST
Brad Buller, Secretary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 23rd day of Apnl 2003, by the following vote-to-wnt
AYES COMMISSIONERS
NOES COMMISSIONERS
ABSENT COMMISSIONERS
•
L
~~ w
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
STANDARD CONDITIONS
PROJECT #: DRC2003-00132
SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
APPLICANT: HANG JONG -
LOCATION: EAST OF HERMOSA AVENUE, SOUTH SIDE OF LEMON AVENUE
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR
COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
A. General Requirements Completion Date
1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, _/_/_•
its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the
alternative, to relingwsh such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents,
officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the Ctty, its agents,
officers, or employees may be regwred by a court to pay as a result of such action. The Ctty
may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action
but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition
E3~
SC-03-03
-
T H E C I T Y O F
RANCHO CUCAMONCA
Staff Report
DATE April 23, 2003
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM• Brad Buller, City Planner
BY. Douglas Fenn, MPA, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
SUBTPM16090 -RICHARD DICK ASSOCIATES - A Tentative Parcel map to
subdivide a 3.6 acre parcel into 2 parcels ranging in size from 1.9 acre (Parcel 1) to
1.7 acre (Parcel 2) in the Mixed Use District (Subarea 18), located on the southwest
corner of Azusa Court and Anaheim Place - APN 0209-272-21. On June 1, 1994,
an Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No 93102055) was prepared
and certified by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as a Program
Environmental Impact Report for the Rancho Cucamonga IASP Subarea 18 Specific
Plan. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that once a Program
Environmental Impact Report has been certified, no further Environmental Impact
Report or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects within the scope
of the Program Environmental Impact Report
PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION•
A. Surroundino Land Use and Zoning
North - Metrolink parking lot, Mixed Use (Subarea 18)
South - Apartment complex, Mixed Use (Subarea 18)
East - General Industrial buildings, General Industrial (Subarea 10)
West - Professional office buildings, Mixed Use (Subarea 18)
B. General Plan Designations
Protect Site -Mixed Use
North - Mixed Use
South - Mixed Use
East - Generallndustrial
West - Mixed Use
• C Site Characteristics The northern portion of the property is under construction for a parking
lot and the southern portion is vacant and slopes slightly from the north to south at
approximately 2 percent grade
ITEM F
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
SUBTPM16090 -RICHARD DICK ASSOCIATES
April 23, 2003
Page 2
ANALYSIS.
A. General. The proposed protect is to subdivide the Tentative Parcel Map of 3.6 acres into
2 parcels ranging m size from 1 19 to 1.7 acre The proposed parcel sizes exceed the 1-acre
minimum standard regwred by the Rancho Cucamonga Subarea 18 Speafic Plan ("Empire
Lakes"). The frontage improvements (street pavement, curb, gutter) have been installed
B Grading and Technical Committees The Grading Committee recommended approval at its
meeting on March 18, 2003 The Technical Committee meeting was held on March 19, 2003,
and determined that, with the recommended standard and special conditions of approval, the
protect is consistent with City standards and ordinances
C Environmental Assessment On June 1, 1994, an Environmental Impact Report (State
Clearinghouse No. 93102055) was prepared and certified by the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga as a Program Environmental Impact Report for the Rancho Cucamonga
IASP Subarea 18 Specific Plan The California Environmental Quality Act provides that once
a Program Environmental Impact Report has been certified, no further Environmental Impact
Report or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent protects within the scope of the
Program Environmental Impact Report
r1
L....I
CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing m the Inland Vallev Daily
Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were marled to all property owners within a
300-foot radws of the protect site
RECOMMENDATION• Staff recommends thatthe Planning Commission approve Tentative Parcel
Map 16090 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions
Respectfully submitted,
1 ----~
Brad Buller
City Planner
BB DF mlg
Attachments Exhibit "A" -Site Utilization Map
Exhibit "B" -Tentative Parcel Map 16090
Exhibit "C" -Design Review Committee Comments dated March 18, 2003
Exhibit "D" -Initial Study, Part II
Draft Resolution of Approval with Conditions for SUBTPM16090
~~`
I
it
i
I
,
1
SITE UTILIZATION MAP ~" °" ~"`
IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONCA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
OGi P pM9pM D PMm 1. 6 PN9C4 YN M6 IMN) ,~ Pq PUT MCCOmEO M B04f 1)) O P111m
YYS, PPSS 00 1M1W01 Po N6U9YC PECOUS Of S.W YM,11pI011 (94M1v WVMA YIO b WfMCm
By QAMGIC 6 Nm2C110M CCOIW OCIpBOI ]!. IppS ~ MST1111p1T NQ P!-YO]D. OfigK ~
DECEMBER 2002 ROBERT B 57ARFORO, JR, LS H37
HUITT-20U.ARS
H
r n
r----------------~ ~ u
YE1RpM I I r
$TII11011 I I r
mMC Aatic.. n I 1 r fGIL ~'.t00'
vo ~ ma.ro~ mar m+n.a ) I r
woo orlorw-vtvc nr u-al / I i
OaPO IS wotl IDI / I ~
U ,4 m-1n-11 ~ I I
/ I r
~Uld ill ~ ~f ~ i / ~
/ ~ j lYPG 9!-NF.. IP I r
'/ / IMO IH maoom. mEM1 mrra I r
~i 1 ' \
/ wvG9 OLWPO.-90C MMI /KI I I
~!Ni~,i' ~~ ~ ~v amMC IMC wsMe Im I ~ r
~/ nMla7u. ~ H',~ CGS \ 1~ ~ wow.m~~
IM I~/,~ omayme mwr q I r r IB amc mT .,e
wO9 OlcwafM•9mc II,F )J-01 / ^~/ -{`~ r u 6 m-ai-M
LT6IWUL ~MOMf MRP10.1O1 /~ V\\` r __ ____
~ ~~- '~'i ~ ~ ~ NEWPORT
r i
~~~`I_lilinilr_ni~ili~~ ~ \ ~=---'- ~ / /--PLACE-----
`~_~'_~`"-`-~--r--=_ -~_~- ~ - AZUSA COURT T
~ I I
I I
~. .~ "~ ,. NI 1~~~1~~~~~~p I r i I I
° A G I I I me tM-.r~ 0, I
/ Q' ao.i sM.rM .~ 0 .-„' wTOPa® r I I un IO[ aanM+o.l
`~~~ ~ I.,o ~ o®,,.mc.mo.. OIIM.p-I ~TITITITIT~IU I w ~_ a lI I I mow .ousnw
`. ~ `~v woc atM,o-r++vmc Mn. w5-I " ~ 1 I ~ I ~H ~. s¢ ~¢ I
` I Osl.c I~,IYaS W ~J U~ I ~ Z / 1~ ~~ ~ 1 I U I0. m-ni-~T~
~~~,~~ -~ -I al I ~ ~ a l A ~, a l I
~, c ~ Sl ~I~ ~ {~ITITITITIT~N r W I ~ I ~ l._______----L-
`\ f \1 ,v ~ Y I I a I
~\ \ I~ 0_ J r________~ W I
`~ ~ ~. ~ - J I E I V I
` \ O I 3' u n m-m-n ~ I yy I p I
``~ t Ci mil = I ~ i ~ I I K ~ DPPQ aew~ IP
~j~ u ~ ~' I m I wo la mmMma
"b~ ~. li ~ Z i i ~ y I I I mow .am.r
~~\\~~ ''-~ Q VACMMT I I ~ 8~~ 9 f l i y o m m iP
c ~~ '~' i 5 11 B ~J i ~
`;;~ ; I I - ~----
~_~ ~~_ ~~~' 7TH STREET-------
r `_-__________~ ~-,~ ~~______I f~______
ri 7TH STREET i' ~
I ~ R
loPG 9M-MP. n I I
WO v¢ oov+ms main mwaa I \ ~ ~,
acnc iB ml m.Hnw usl J I I I
u Pn m-Tn-a ~ I I ~~mOC m
/ I
I I •P ML m-aTw 9
/ I I I ~ ~9_~s_
/
I I I
/' I r__________________1________
I I r
.ERERSON I I I I i'-
MARRIENI$ I I loaf ae-MU II ~ ~~ ~
xwMC se-no.. Ie I I ~ mow I ~ ~' ~
IMO IH ma4lve L4mw PwMO I I f I
~ / wCO OFiYRI-R6i NM W I I I f U ,6 m- OO[ I y pi yy Jp
OOnO IH. M'.OYDrt Q.sIB I I ~ M_2. i i j~ ~ O
I r------- Y ^}
' u w m-m-n I I xoMC aw-MU u_i _ i ~ __yY___
/ 1 I _ _ __ __ ff~-;-; pyy
.' 1 I ,.
I I I
/, / I I i I f~~•~i
~ I I I un ~ maoMme ( I I ~ ~
I I mOw OOOYI
I I I / n m-~o-a I {!} ~~ 4
I
i
i
EABF1,01T
O ® 0w.r ~nrrr"°°rpr r FID~a~I~r
wrarrC SaOt
b 0 a b 100
P+I,4C~. r5
m.a 9FYCr n j
rw9 a>t 9maaraw mon.9ra..a ~ i
9nrr a,a9p,Y_y~0 ~...,-w I ~
Dana: uz r•nrc for
,~- >o-m-a ; ~ - 9
• ~ ~ Q\\\
`ten ~ i \
h
~1 ,. _ _ _I
~_. ~ -~-~
~~((\\~~~~ 44 PARCEL 1.
.Y14~ ~_ ~ - _ 192 ~5 ~
I!_ I
ti
o
~I
I
J ~
~ i
I
I I ~
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP N0. 16090 s'EET' °" 91EET
IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
eE9a • waor a rAnm r. v n•xm ••n xa u5u As rEn eur n[camm w 999a rn a n•9m
root, o•m b tW Ww K paa9rF. aCaams a SAn BflYwpOn COIIMir a9fa9•A AMO •0 •rrdOED
T mlr9rcArt 6 WYCCOOn aEC»IY[DO OCrO9pf 01 1905 K w59nlrpi M0. W-]GY}N On10/1 RENmS
OECEYBER 2002 R08ERT B STANFORD. ,R, LS M37
HUITT-20LLARS
2 PARCEL'S J 63 ACRES
~ TYPN:AL BECTION9 un
•A N
M~ ~]V \ ,
`~ ~ ~~ b\
!' !` w ~k
11~ t`' jr 1 \~
~-> »=A= ~
Q~Qb~~ aG4:~ }' \
Q r
~\
O ; ~
~ PARCEL 2
I ]2 AO2E5
~ ~.~ ~x9r¢ veve-.cw ie •-
_ _ ~ vuo us aenura• ow.a 9WUra
h WLWnIG-9TD%0.W Ll-0r
rsn¢ uz NYrlpr mR4
~ ' r' AI IIR L.yrt-Il ~
_ZR= ~ MMCIr fLI,K
+t f ~~a rqT m SWL dM
~~ I r.. r ms.wemn m
Y Y
I li j
r i r rim r AY
~~ re®a.c
I~ P` ~ AZUSA CWRT °""
Y~ ~ wr m ecu[
u =, ~
1 {~ I Ma0ARC0 rol 9i0'"ofR
~ Rg1ARD pCK ! ASSOgA1E5/
i iARIYAY 9U9E55 fr91TER S 11.C
I~ im .araar narc vrt s
1
1 ~YA er.I i ~ wpb. 1 BGOI µ0]Y0
I ~~
:, ~ f t SAL DYNAYLS PAOPFRTY. NC
YI I nm Y.no r.n SauV.m aarz .w
N , wrwea u ainr
5 .~ I np4. (rw7 .9.-Ya0
' ~~
f' w®ran M na as]cx v
I ,~; .. NOITi-zoLLARs
~ W nm 5 r9uamr .rw2 sort c
I~ ~'
i
I~
~~Y
i i
it i.,n
S
- f i
~ ~ wawa riuaY• ern,
j U rxaxc (aml Sao-aro
Y; ~ ROBQr a ArArOa A LL W) ~
i NOTEB
, ®~.e .e®mrr n.rs .r••
~
N
~ . aa.~ um a.. .Y..
i I~ ..s®uo ~Y. ...m,_..ra ur
.wmr-..wr
U a •®n I.m .~ a-m-n
•: m~
fG1E r'.99'
i
U7L1TV PROVDERB
aac
I ~ aim mr• rp srisr a
cvar. m o9w.
i
i ~r.m mm
wm ^~
wrm
~_ ,m,~
.e,...~. rru arm MI[
u 1 cm..-~ ~
~
e
m
I ' alp. r.n rp wir
~ ~ r~pdrr r4 n{m[r
a[Ypm; W n)a ~ L YNpr r4r
~ tm o-mn
rO'OB
i
j rr. 9wr
maroe a~
m w
nm
9r ~~ra ne•m
- a
w~r
u nrm rrmrasr row
omn mi ur-rY rm. u nnr
~ .~ Irmr+-rvr
-. a"ainm. wnr m osw• mrA rn . m va
~~ Z nlrp rr WrY
i 61 Y011Y[ ue Dlr. mum mc.
•i
d~ ,rnM 4 d.
~ ~r>a~a
O Or sr~u
4®~IP Rr
~ Y 0~l rrln 11® 0rR tl,Y
P,90 na; Iy O 9
i 0wrwna; vart4nuon
I s.pq y m,Y Ipl rL]T~ ru 10j riYM
til>v
o .vwvr~~
i
i
i
YIWNEN AVENUE
x9r m Scu[
CONSENT CALENDAR COMMENTS
• 7 00 p m Doug Fenn March 18, 2003
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM 16090- RICHARD
DICK ASSOCIATES - A tentative parcel map to subdivide a 3 6-acre parcel into two parcels ranging
in size froml 9 acres (Parcel 1) to 1 7 acres (Parcel 2), located on the southwest corner of Azusa
Court and Anaheim Place Empire Lakes Planning Area X - APN 0209-272-21
Staff Comments The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee
discussion
The protect is an infdl protect within the Empire Lakes Subarea 18 Speafic Plan area The proposed
diwsion is m compliance with pertinent Development Code Regulation and the Subdivision Map Act
Staff and the Engineering Department have worked closely with the applicant, therefore, there are
no issues that need to be discussed before the Design Review Committee
Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the Committee approve the protect as proposed
Design Review Committee Action
Members Present Larry McNiel, Pam Stewart, Dan Coleman
Staff Planner Doug Fenn
• The protect was approved as submitted
C~
~l ~1
~~
BACKGROUND
City of Rancho Cucamonga
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
INITIAL STUDY PART II
1. Project File: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16090
2. Related Files: DRC2002-00820 Minor Development Review
3. Description of Project: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE
PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16090 - RICHARD DICK ASSOCIATES - A Tentative
Parcel map to subdivide a 3.6 acre parcel into 2 parcels ranging m size from 1.9 acre
(Parcel 1) to 1.7 acre (Parcel 2) m the Mixed Use Distract (Subarea 18), located on the
southwest comer of Azusa Court and Anaheim Place - APN: 0209-272-21 On June 1,
1994, an Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 93102055) was
prepared and certified by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as a
Program Environmental Impact Report for the Rancho Cucamonga IASP Subarea 18
Specific Plan. The Califorrna Environmental Quality Act provides that once a Program
Environmental Impact Report has been certified, no further Environmental Impact Report
or Negative Declaration is regwred for subsequent protects within the scope of the
Program Environmental Impact Report.
4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address:
Rancho Cucamonga 685, LLC
5109 East La Palma, Swte D
Anaheim, CA 92807
5. General Plan Designation: Mixed Use
6. Zoning: Mixed Use
7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The northern portion of the property is under
construction for a parking lot and the southern portion is vacant and slopes slightly from
the north to the south at approximately 2 percent grade. The Metrolink parking lot to the
north, professional office bwldings to the west, the Jefferson Apartment complex to the
south, and general mdustnal bwldmgs, to the east primanly surround the site.
8. Lead Agency Name and Address:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planrnng Division
10500 Civic Center Dnve
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
9. Contact Person and Phone Number:
Doug Fenn
(909) 477-2750
~~
Initial Study for
SUBTPM16090
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 2
10. Other agencies whose approval is required:
None
DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation.
protect --
S!i
D g Fe
Associate Planner
April 23, 2003
(X) I find that although the proposed protect could have a sigrnficant effect on the
environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially
sigrnficant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to
applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier
EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed
EARLIER ANALYSES
Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA
process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative
Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this protect were within
the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to
applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on
the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study
and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices,
10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply):
(X) Environmental Impact Report for University/Crest Planned Development
(State Clearinghouse No 88082915)
(Certified June 1991)
(X) Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for Revised University protect
(State Clearinghouse No. 98121091)
(Certified October 26, 1999)
(X) Intial Study/Addendum for Revised University Protect
(Certified August 1, 2001)
r
RESOLUTION NO 03-68
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL
MAP SUBTPM16090, A SUBDIVISION CREATING 2 PARCELS ON
3 6 ACRES IN THE MIXED USE DISTRICT OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA
SUBAREA 18 SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER
OF AZUSA COURT AND ANAHEIM PLACE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0209-272-21
A. Reatals
1. Richard Dick Assocate filed an application for approval of Tentative Parcel Map
SUBTPM16090, as descnbed in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter m this Resolution, the
subtect Tentative Parcel Map request is referred to as "the application "
2. On the 23rd day of April 2003, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public
heanng for the above-descnbed map.
All legal preregwsites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred
B Resolution
1 This Commission hereby speafically finds that all of the facts set forth m the Reatals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above-
referenced public heanng on Apnl 23, 2003, including wntten and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, this Commission hereby speafically finds as follows
a The application applies to property located at the southwest comer ofAnaheim Place
and Azusa Court ~nnth a street frontage of 630 feet and lot depth of 252 feet and is presently
improved with a parlung lot m the northerly half, and
b The subtect property is wnthm the Rancho Cucamonga Subarea 18 Speafc Plan, and
c The property to the north of the subject site is a Metrolink Station and parking lot, the
property to the south consists of the Jefferson at Empire Lakes apartments, the property to the east
~s mdustnal, and the property to the west is developed with two office bwldmgs, and
d The application proposes to create two parcels of 1 9 acre and 1 7 acre, which
exceeds the mirnmum 1-acre size regwrement of the Rancho Cucamonga Subarea 18 Speafc Plan
3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above-
referenced public heanng and upon the speafic findings of facts set forth m paragraphs 1 and 2
above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows.
a That the tentative parcel map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code,
and any applicable speafic plans, and
b That the design or improvements of the tentative parcel map is consistent with the
General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable speafic plans, and
~g
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 03-68
SUBTPM16090 -RICHARD DICK ASSOCIATES
April 23, 2003 •
Page 2
c. That the site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed, and
d That the design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental
damage and avoidable intury to humans and vvildlife or their habitat, and
e. That the tentative parcel map is not likely to cause senous public health problems;
and
f That the design of the tentative parcel map will not conflict wrath any easement
acgwred by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the
proposed subdivision
4 Based upon the facts and mfortnation contained m the staff report of Apnl 23, 2003,
togethervvith all wntten and oral reports included for the environmental review forthe application,
the Planning Commission states that On June 1, 1994, an Environmental Impact Report (State
Cleannghouse No 93102055) was prepared and certified by the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga as a Program Environmental Impact Report for the Rancho Cucamonga IASP
Subarea 18 Specific Plan The California Environmental Quality Act provides that once a Program
Environmental Impact Report has been certified, no further Environmental Impact Report or
Negative Declaration is required for subsequent protects wnthin the scope of the Program
Environmental Impact Report
5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth m paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby approves the application subted to each and every condition set forth
below and m the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference
Enameenng Division
1) Provide a crosswalk on Anaheim Place at Azusa Court (ewstmg stop
controlled)
2) Additional street trees might be required dunng plan check along
Milliken Avenue
3) Revise the existing Street Improvement Plans to reflect the missing
public improvements on Milliken Avenue, Azusa Court, Anaheim Place,
and 7th Street, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer
4) Dnve approach locations shall be per City Standard Dnveway Policy
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF APRIL 2003
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY
Lany T McNiel, Chairman
f I
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 03-68
SUBTPM16090 -RICHARD DICK ASSOCIATES
Apnl 23, 2003
Page 3
ATTEST
Brad Buller, Secretary
I, Brad Bulier, Secretary of the Plamm~g Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the
Plamm~g Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 23rd day of Apnl 2003, by the folioHnng vote-to-wnt
AYES COMMISSIONERS
NOES COMMISSIONERS
ABSENT COMMISSIONERS
~~
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENTS
STANDARD CONDITIONS
PROJECT #: SUBTPM16090
SUBJECT:
MAP
APPLICANT: RICHARD DICK ASSOCIA
LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER AZUSA COURT AND ANAHEIM PLACE
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR
COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
A. General Requirements
The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City,
its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the
alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the Ctty, its agents,
officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents,
officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City
may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action
but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition
B. Time Limits
This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning
Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from
the date of the approval
C. Site Development
1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which
include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign
program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein,
Development Code regulations
2 All site, grading, landscape, vrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for
consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment,
bwlding, etc) or pnor to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or
approved use has commenced, whichever comes fvst
3 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development
Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in
effect at the time of bwldtng permit issuance
Completion Date.
-~-~-
-~~-
-~-~-
-~-~-
_/-/_
SC-03-03 1 ~ I~
ProiectNo SUBTPMt6090
Comolehon Date
4. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall
be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of
concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Clty
Planner For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed In
underground vaults
D. Landscaping
1 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be
included In the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and
approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be
required by the Engineering Division
2 Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees,
meandering sidewalks (with horizontal change), and Intensified landscaping, is required
along Milliken Avenue
3 Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on
the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer
4 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located In public maintenance areas,
the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division
5 Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of
Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR
COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
Street Improvements
Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to.
Street Name Curb 8
Gutter AC
Pvmt Side-
walk Drive
Appr Street
Lights Street
Trees Comm
Trail Median
Island Blke
Trail
Other
7th Street x x (e)
Anaheim Place x x x (e)
Azusa Court x x (e(f)
Milliken Avenue x
Notes (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement
reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk
shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be
provided for this item (e) traffic signs and striping (f) access ramp
Improvement Plans and Construction
Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and Intersection safety
lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered
Clvif Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the Clty Engineer Security
shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the Clty Engineer and
the Clty Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street
Improvements, prior to final map approval or the Issuance of building permits,
whichever occurs first
Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a
construction permit shall be obtained from the Clty Engineer's Office in addition to any
other permits requred
Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit,
and Interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the Clty Engineer
~~_
~~_
~~-
~-~_
-~~.
-/~-
-~-~-
-/~.
-~-~-
-~-~-
SC-03-03 2 t- I~
Protect No SUBTPM16090
Comoletion Date
d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be Installed with any new construction or
reconstruction protect along mator or secondary streets and at intersections for future
traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the
street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City
Engineer
Notes
1) Putl boxes shall be No 6 at Intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of
200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the Clty Engineer
2) Conduit shall be 3-Inch (at intersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized
steel with pull rope or as specified
e. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on ail comers of intersections per City
Standards or as directed by the City Engineer
f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with
adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A
cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be
refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer
g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be
installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots
h Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan
check-
3 Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in
accordance with the City's street tree program
4 Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The
completed legend and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street
improvement plans Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those
areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans
The City Engineer reserves the right to adtust tree species based upon field conditions and
other variables For additional information, contact the Protect Engineer
Min
Grow
Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size• Gty
Anaheim Piece Brachychaon Bottle tree 5' 25' o c 15-gal Fill in
Populneus
Azusa Court p a 8' Liquidambar Ncn 8' 25' o c 24'-box Fill in
or greater Slyraciflua'Pelo Alto'
p a less than 8' Lagestroemia Indica Crape myrtle hybnd- 3' 20' o c
'Catawba' dark purple
Milliken Avenue Cinnamomum Camphor tree 8' 30' 15-gal Fill in
north of Foothill Camphors o c forma
foreground groups of 3
p a 8' or greater to 4
25'oc
informal
background Pinus Canenensis Cana island ine
ry P 8' groupings 15•gal
p a 8' or greater
71h Street Planentus AceMolia London plane tree 8' 30' o c 15-gal Fill in
p a 8' or greater
Pyrus Calleryana 20' o c
p a less than 8' -Bradford' Bradford pear 3' 15-gal
'TREES SHALL BE 15-GALLON SIZE UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED
~~-
•
~_~_
~~_
-/_J-
~-~-
~~_
-~-~-
`~
SC-03-03 3 ~ 13
Protect No SUBTPM16090
Comoletion Data
Construction Notes for Street Trees
1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans
. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic sods report shall be furnished to
the City inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill sod
amendments, as determined by the City inspector
3) All street trees are sublect to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Division
4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only.
F. Public Maintenance Areas
1 A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting
Distracts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of
budding permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer
2. Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective
Beautification Master Plan Milliken Avenue
G. Improvement Completion
If the requred public improvements are not completed prior to approval of the final parcel
map, an improvement certificate shall be placed upon the final parcel map, stating that they
will be completed upon development for Parcel 2
H. Utilities
1 Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sandary sewerage system, water,
gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility
Standards. Easements shall be provided as required
2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary
3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requrements of the
Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and
the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of
compliance from the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits,
whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water distract within 90
days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits
in the case of all other residential protects
4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved
Approval of the final parcel map will be sublect to any requirements that may be received
from them
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION
PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS:
SEE ATTACHED
~~-
-~~-
~~-
~-~-
-~-~.
-~-~.
~~-
SC-03-03 41^
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
FIRE SAFETY DIVISION
TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMENTS
FD PLAN REVIEW#: FD-03-0911
PROJECT #:
PROJECT NAME:
DATE:
PLAN TYPE:
APPLICANT NAME:
OCCUPANCY CLASS:
FLOOR AREA (S):
SUBTPMI
Parkln~ Lot
March 9, 2003
N/A
TYPE CONSTRUCTION• Type N/A
FIRE PROTECTION
SYSTEM REQUIRED N/A
LOCATION: SW corner of Azusa and Anaheim
FD REVIEW BY: Tlm Feleran, Fire Inspector
PLANNER: ,,,, Doug Fenn ,~~,,,,,,~,~„
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMENTS APPLY TO YOUR
PROJECT. THOSE PORTIONS OF THE PLANS COVERED BY COMMENTS /N
SECTIONS B THROUGH E ARE CONSIDERED INCOMPLETE AS NOTED.
PROJECT CANNOT BE SCHEDULED FOR PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL
OR PROCEED TO BUILDING PLAN CHECK UNTIL ITEMS B THROUGH E ARE
ADDRESSED.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2770, TO
VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING:
PLEASE CONSIDER THIS PROJECT "INCOMPLETE" UNTIL ITEMS IN SECTIONS "B" THROUGH "E" ARE
CORRECTED OR ADDRESSED
A. Outstanding Fire District Issues Affecting Approval of Protect- Incompleteness Comments
1 There are no outstanding Fire District "completeness" items for this protect. Any conditions,
comments, or corrections are technical in nature and shall be addressed prior to issuance of required
permits or a certificate of occupancy as indicated.
B. Fire Distract Fees
1. No Fees Due: All fees due at this time have been paid.
C. Community Facilities Distracts Annexation
1. There are no Fire Distract annexation issues for this protect
r~
~~
D. Available Water Supply
1. There are no Fire District water supply or fire flow issues for this project based on one of the
following:
a. The required verification of available water supply has been received The Rancho Cucamonga Fve
Protection District WaterAvadabildv for Fire Protection Form has been completed by the Water
District and submitted to the Fire Safety Division, or
b The ro ect does not re uire roof of available water su I or additional fire flow
E. Fire District Access Issues to Be Addressed Immediately
1 No Access Problems: There are no outstanding "incompleteness" items related to FD access for this
project For outstanding technical issues see below
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT- STANDARD CONDITIONS & REQUIREMENTS -
General, Procedural, Technical, or Operational Information that shall be Included,
Corrected, or Completed as noted below. The following is applicable to the above
project.
PRIOR TO (PARCEL) MAP RECORDATION- For Each Development Phase
1 Reciprocal Access Agreement: The plans as submitted indicate that a requred point of Fire District
access
a Reqwres passage on property not under the control of the applicant; or
b Does not access a public way, or
c Crosses a property line
Please provide a permanent access agreement granting vrevocable use of the adjacent property for use
by the Fire District to gain access to the subject property The agreement shall include a statement that
no obstruction, gate, fence, bwlding, or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access The
recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan regwred below The agreement shall be
recorded with the County of San Bernardino, Recorders Office The agreement shall be approved by the
Fire Safety Division prior to recordation
To assist the Fire Safety Division in reviewing the agreement the following shall be included in the
submittal
a Title Report. A current title report, policy of title insurance, or other equivalent documentation
proving ownership of all property included in the agreement
b Legal Description. A legal description of all property subject to the agreement
c Assessor's Parcel Numbers. The assessor's parcel numbers of each parcel subject to the
agreement
d Site Plan. The access roadway shall comply with the requirements of Private Roadways and
Fire Lanes listed above A scaled site plan showing the path of the Fire District access, the width,
turn radu, load-bearing capacity of roadway surtace, etc shall be provided.
Contact the Fire Safe Division 909 477-2770
Fire District Forms and Letters
Note: It these conditions are part of the final Standard Conditions issued by the Plamm~g Division referenced
Fire District forms and letters are not included Contact the Fire Safety Division for copies of forms or letters The
forms and letter are also found in previously issued Fire District comments.
rare Uistnct Review Letter (P&E)-Template
SL 10/31/02 Revision r
T~
T H E C I T V O F
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
StaffReport
DATE Apnl 23, 2003
TO' Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM. Brad Buller, City Planner
BY Larry Henderson, Pnncipal Planner
SUBJECT TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS
BACKGROUND With the resignation of Commissioners Tolstoy and Mannenno, the
Commission needs to appoint a new member and an altemate to the Trails Committee for the
balance of their terms The Committee meets once a month, as needed, usually on the second
Wednesday of the month at 6 00 p m preceding the regular Planning Commission meeting
The member term expires in July 2004 and the current altemate term expires in July 2003, but
• that expiration date could be extended to July 2004.
CURRENT MEMBERSHIP For your information, the current Trails Advisory Committee
appointments are as follows
Member Term Expires Appointment
Pamela Stewart July 2003 Planning Commission (1999)
Peter Tolstoy July 2004 Planning Commission (1986)
Patricia Carlson July 2004 Park & Recreation Commission (2000)
James Clopton July 2003 Park & Recreation Commission (2001)
Tim Mitchell July 2003 Bicycling Member at Large (2001)
Laura Jarek July 2003 Equestnan Member at Large (2001)
John Mannerino July 2003 Altemate Planning Commission (1999)
Martin Dickey July 2004 Altemate Park & Recreation Commission (2000)
Brian Zupke July 2003 Alternate Bicycling Member at Large (2001)
Respectfully submitted,
Brad uller
City Planner
BB GS gs
ITEM G