Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2003/05/14 - Agenda Packet
n LJ u • THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ' PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA jlnxceo CucnMOxcn MAY 14, 2003 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chamber 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Chairman McNiel _ Vice Chairman Macias Fletcher _ McPhail _ Stewart II. ANNOUNCEMENTS III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES April 23, 2003 IV. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non- controvers~al They will be acted on by the Commission at one time without discussion If anyone has concern over any dem, ~t should be removed for d~scuss~on A ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2002-00751 - RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION - The development of four industrial buildings totaling 54,662 square feet on 4 86 acres of land in the General Industrial Distract (Subarea 13), located at the southeast corner and southwest corner of 6th Street and Charles Smith Avenue - APN 229-263-05 and 229-283-04 and 05 Related file Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16009 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration (Continued from Apnl 23, 2003) - PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA 2 MAY 14, 2003 RANG}tG CcrcAnaoNGA B ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2002-00750 - RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION - The development of five industrial bwldings totaling 117,790 square feet on 7 4 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 14), located at the southeast corner of 6th Street and the I-15 Freeway - APN 229-283-08, 10, and 11 Related file Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16010 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration (Continued from April 23, 2003) V. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related protect Please wait to be recognrzed by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address All such opinions shall be l~m~ted to 5 minutes per mdiv~dual for each pro/ect Please sign in after speaking C ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16009 - RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION - The subdivision of 4 86 acres of land into 4 parcels in the General Industrial District (Subarea 13), located at the southeast corner and southwest corner of 6th Street and Charles Smith Avenue -APN 229-263-05 and 229-283-04 and O5 Related file Development Review DRC2002-00751 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration (Continued from April 23, 2003) D ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16010 - RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION - The subdivision of 7 4 acres of land into 5 parcels in the General Industrial Distract (Subarea 14), located at the southeast corner of 6th Street and the I-15 Freeway -APN 229-283-08, 10, and 11 Related file Development Review DRC2002-00750 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration (Continued from April 23, 2003) E MODIFICATION NO 2 TO DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRCDR01-04 - AMERICAN BEAUTY DEVELOPMENT CO - A request to modify the pattern of residential uses for the planning area west of Day Creek Boulevard and south of Church Street, modify various graphics, and add Design Guidelines for multi-family development within the Victoria Arbors Master Plan, generally bounded by Base Line Road, Church Street, Day Creek channel, Foothill Boulevard, and Etiwanda Avenue - APN 0227-161-28, 31, 33, 35, 36 and 38, 0227-171-08, 11, 12, 20, 22, 23, and 25, 0227-201-04, 13 thru 18, 22, 28 thru 31, 33 and 36, and 0227-211-40 C~ • • • • - PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA 3 MAY 14 2003 , R~~HO CucnmoNCn F DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2003-00348 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend Section 17 08 (Residential Distncts) of the Development Code regarding second dwelling units within the Very Low, Low and Low-Medium (1-2, 2-4, and 4-8 dwelling units per acre, respectively) Residential Districts to comply with State Assembly Bill 1866 VI. NEW BUSINESS G DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00237 - ROBINSON'S MAY - A request to construct a two story, 180,080 square foot department store (Robinson's May) within the Victoria Gardens Regional Center in the Mixed Use District of the Victoria Community Plan, located north of Foothill Boulevard, south of Church Street, between Day Creek Boulevard and the I-15 Freeway - APN 0227-161-48 and 49, 0227-171-36, 0227-201-35 and 45 thru 48, and 0227-211-30 and 39 thru 43 This action is within the scope of the protect reviewed in an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (State Clearinghouse No 20010301028) prepared for Development Agreement 01-02, Victoria Community Plan Amendment 01-01, and Tentatwe Parcel Map SUBTT15716 Said EIR was certified by the City Council on February 20, 2002, and no additional environmental review for the discretionary actions mentioned in this notice is regwred pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166 VII. PUBLIC COMMENTS This ~s the time and place for the general public to address the commission Items to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda VIII. COMMISSION BUSINESS IX. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission has adopted Adm~nistrahve Regulations that set an 11 00 p m adjournment hme if items go beyond that bme, they shall be heard only wdh the consent of the Commission - PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ~N~HO MAY 14, 2003 G'UCAMONGA 4 THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL ADJOURN TO A WORKSHOP IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING IN THE RAINS ROOM TO DISCUSS PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2003-00106 AND PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2003-00108 - G & L COMMERCIAL, LLC; DRC2003-00442 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00336 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00337 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES 1, Gail Sanchez, Planning Commission Secretary of the City o(Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on May 8, 2003, at least 72 hours poor to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964 2 at 10500 C~wc Center Dnv e, Rancho Cucamonga n ~.-~~y,c.~-.~, r1 LJ I 1 L_J Vicinity Map Planning Commission May 14, 2003 A ai B and * City Hall ~ Item F is Citywide City of Rancho Cucamonga ~ N MAY 14, 2003 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA INDEX ITEM NO. ITEM TITLE PAGES A ends 2 - 5 A - C Environmental Assessment & Development 6- 138 Review DRC2002-00751 Environmental Assessment & Tentative Parcel Ma SUBTPM16009 B - D Environmental Assessment & Development 139 - 263 Review DRC2002-00750 Environmental Assessment & Tentative Parcel Ma SUBTPM16010 E Modification No. 2 to Development Review 264 - 294 DRCDR01-04 -American Beauty Development Co. F Development Code Amendment DRC2003- 295 - 315 00348 G Develo ment Review DRC2003-00237 316 - 351 • T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE May 14, 2003 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM• Brad Buller, Clty Planner BY Warren Morellon, Assistant Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16009 - RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION -The subdivision of 4 86 acres of land Into 4 parcels In the General Industrial District (Subarea 13), located at the southeast comer and southwest corner of 6th . Street and Charles Smith Avenue -APN 229-263-05 and 229-283-04 and 05 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2002-00751 - RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION - The development of four Industrial buildings totaling 54,662 square feet on 4 86 acres of land in the General tndustnal Dlstnct (Subarea 13), located at the southeast comer and southwest comer of 6th Street and Charles Smith Avenue -APN 229-263-05 and 229-283-04 and OS BACKGROUND The Item was originally scheduled for the December 11, 2002, Planning Commisslon meeting At the request of the applicant, the Item was continued five times (December 11, 2002, and January 8, February 26, March 26, and April 23, 2003), in order to address the limits of off-site public improvements associated with the protect Based on numerous discussions with the City without resolve, the applicant has requested no more continuances of the protect and would like the item heard on May 14, 2003 Attached are copies of the Planning Commission staff reports for your reference (Exhibits "B" - "F") On May 6, 2003, staff received a letter from the applicant outlining concems with conditions of approval for the off-site improvements Staff was unable to generate a written response addressing the applicant's concerns prior to the preparation of this agenda Consequently, staff well be prepared to respond to the Issues at the Planning • Commission meeting ITEMS A,C PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM16009/DRC2002-00751 - RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION May 14, 2003 Page 2 RECOMMENDATION• Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16009 and Development Revew DRC2002-00751 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions and issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration Brad Buller City Planner BB WM:Is Attachments Exhibit °A" -Applicant's Letter Outlining Issues dated May 6, 2003 Exhibit `B" - Planning Commission Staff Report dated April 23, 2003 Exhibit "C" - Planning Commission Staff Report dated March 26 2003 Exhibit "D" - Planning Commission Staff Report dated February 26, 2003 Exhibit °E" - Planning Commission Staff Report dated January 8, 2003 Exhibit °F" -Planning Commission Staff Report dated December 11, 2002 Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16009 Draft Reso lution of Approval for Development Review DRC2002-00751 • • q, C. ~ Sant"By: Planning Research Int'1.; 714 505 1870; flay-8.03 7:OBPM; Pege 214 ~ Development Corporation May 6, 2003 Mt. harry McNeil L"hoir-»m+ PLANNING COMML9910N c/o Mr Brad Huller N[mvr}ngDrrecrr,r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10500 Civic Cerunr Drive Rancho Cucamon8a, CA 97730 FAV~CST>~1L (909)b77-2847 Re: DRC200Zr00750 & 00751 / SUBTPM-16009 & 16010 Applieadona For Two lnduatrial Park Projects, "The Vineyard ast" and "The Vincvards West", On The East and West Sides of I-15 On The South Side of 6'~Street. Dear Chairman McNeil The Planning Commission has previously coatimrcd the two apphcatwns refcrcnced above on five occasions pwsuant to ow requests due to icsrms we felt were detrimental to our projects We would like to express our appreciation and thanks to the commission for allowing us lime to try and mtligatc those issues, though our efforts have been llrtilc Our project on the West aide of i-15 is a vary small fow building, 54,662 sq.ft industrial protect It encompasses approximately 3.3 ataes, with the follovnng 1. L'rcccptionally shallow depths adjacent to the freeway 2 Two corners 3 A street rcalil;ttmetrt on Charles Smith Ave. 4 Re-surfacing and finishing of 6°' St (iacludmg CalTntns approved work under thr freeway overpass) 3 Requuixl undo-grounding of utilities along 6a' St. and Charles Smith Ave., and 6 An in-lion Cee for landscaping of the li~eeway bam adjacent to the project. All of the above combined with the normal impact fixs of schools, transportallon development, CCWI) and various hook-up and service fees have left us with an ewnomically un-buildable project, even thous we are trying to develop only what the zorring allows in the best small mdustdal building market in twenty-five years. Our wur.lustun is that this small prolerx does not have the horsepower to economically pay for all of the Cees and offarte work that have bnnrr condtuoncd to the project The pnmary reason i ti that the shallow depths of the project don4 allow for enough building area with respect to the street and p,tG3 P.(1 Roz 1724 • 'rl~snn, CA 92781.3724 • USA • tel. (714) 303-1373 • fax (714) 305-167(1 Exhibit "A" Me 8-03 7:07PM; Pege 3/4 Sent 6y: Planning Research Int'1.; 714 505 1870; y- freeway frontages, especially due to the fact that there are two streets that front the project. Our East side project, with almost double the depths, and soma of the same fees end offsitc costs, is economically viable due to the greater economics of wale. We directly asked city staff for relief on three items as follows l ~ty~vc rho condition for providing Cor landscaping of the freeway berms on both sides of I-1 S adjacent to our properties. The savings on the East side would be applied to the West project. This cost seems so out of proportion to the size of our projects end their capabilities to not only pay it, but to also compete in the surrounding marketplace On the West side, it amounts to 85 teats per sq.fr. of building area. On the East arde it is 56 teats per building sq ft Both of these are excessive costs to these projects Furthermore, they seem so drsproportrotrate and unfair In approving the legislation for landscaping the freeway berm by adjacent properties. the ctty did not take urto account the aizo of adjacent propertres Consequently, a parcel of 10 or 20 acres with the same lieeway flrorrtage as 3 or 4 acres pays the same amount. No attempt to form assessmem districts where very small Properties were grouped was considered 2 Waive lire condition of improving 6a' St. on both aides of the 1-15 Jrecway, including the t;atl'rans nght-of--way undo the freeway (which i8 a reimbursement), and the t.,el Trans encmachment permit condition (the Earl savings would be applied to the West side project). This had bane the intact of Joe O'Neil before fiscal issues apparently overtook things, and was bead open the c:vnc:ept that Gm St, was regional and that there might be other ways to fund this small stretch of road 3, Waive the in-lieu utihty under-grounding fee for 6a' street on the West side only (there are nv East aide under-grounding requircmmus). We understand and agree that we shall pay for end underground the utilities along (;trades Smilh Ave at as estimated cost of 553,000 (approx 51.00 per bldg Sq R. City stab's response to the above itettra was that all three are sec forth in ordinaaccs or resolutiutu, and urged useto go ahead and otbtaio entitlements, and thane wailer uP~to Sve yrears to see wh t happens to the market Gonsequently, we are proceeding with the following requests to the Planning Comaussron~ a) That the Emt and West projects both be approved subject to the currem extsting conditions, and subject to item "c" below. b) That the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council that the city undertake a shrdy tti ddermine if the Planning Commission and/or the City Council should have discrettoa in mitigating disproportionate impacts by limttrng arose impacts on small properties and Projects where ordinances and/or resolutions create such impacts, and most especially as they apply to freeway berm landscaping, strut and other offsita work requirements, transportation development fees, and drainage fxs, and ,~ t C `l Y~ J Bent By: Planning fleseerch Int'1.; 714 505 1870; Mey-B-03 7:07PM; Page u c) That any modifications to any ordinances and/or resolutions bescd upon the above rnVwnmendation in item "b" be rctmactively applied to urt[ projects f)ur wish is that we have brought to the city's attention certain tssucs that may acid to be looked imo City requirements and wnditions that work nn a level ficld for 8,10, 20 and 40 acre dcvelopments may be a minefield for the 1 to 5 acre pmlecta We etc only asking that them be sonic discretionary ability by the Planning Commission or City Council when a situation bec:utnes egregious for the small project very truly yours, ~~~ ~ Richard K. Wagnerc~ cc Warren Morohon Connie Wagner Davidson • ~,c5 T H E C I T Y O F R A N C fl O C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE April 23, 2003 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM. Brad Buller, Clty Planner BY Warren Morellon, Assistant Planner SUBJECT• ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16009 - RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION -The subdivision of 4.86 acres of land into 4 parcels In the General industrial District (Subarea 13), located at the southeast corner and southwest corner of 6th Street and Charles Smith Avenue -APN 229-263-05 and 229-283-04 and 05 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2002-00751 - RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION -The development • of four industrial buildings totaling 54,662 square feet on 4.86 acres of land In the General Industrial District (Subarea 13), located at the southeast corner and southwest corner of 6th Street and Charles Smith Avenue -APN: 229-263-05 and 229-283-04 and 05 BACKGROUND• The item was originally scheduled for the December 11, 2002, Planning Commission meeting At the request of the applicant, the Item was continued four times (December 11, 2002, January 8, 2003, February 26, 2003, and March 26, 2003) until April 23, 2003, In order to address the limits of off-site public Improvements associated with the protect The applicant has submitted another letter requesting the Item be continued again to the May 14, 2003, meeting because he Is still In negotiations with the Engineering Division to resolve outstanding Issues (Exhibit "A") RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission continue Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16009 and Development Review DRC2002-00751 to May 14, 2003. Respectfu ly submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB. W M/Is • Attachments• Exhibit "A" - Letter dated April 15, 2003, requesting a fifth continuance to May 14,2003 A , C- to Exhibit "B" Sent By: Planning Research Int'1.; 714 505 1870; Apr-15-03 4:34PId; Paae 2/2 • Development April l5, 2003 ~~iA HACSmvili.r tsns~a7~-zsa7 ~~ rporation Mr Brad Buller Planning /)+recror CITY OF RANCHO CU(;AMONGA 10500 Civio Cenler Drivc Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ite: bRC2002-00750 8c 00751 / SUBTPM-16DU9 & 16D10 AppGcaGons For'Irva industrial Psrk Projects, "The Vineyards EasC' and "'i he Vinevards Wesl", Un The East and West Sides oti-15 On The South Side of 6°i Strcet. Dear Brad Pursuant to our discussion yesterday, please contirluc the above referenced apphoattuns uuhl the May 14, 2003 Plamm~g Commission meeting Please let me know if you have any quesuons Thank you for your help In this matter Ve truly yourrs, `~~ ~/ Richard K, Wagner cc' Warren Morehon Connie Wagner Davidson Carol Plowman Exhibit "Iq" oY/y-3~o3 PO. Box 3724 • 'I'uuin, CA 92781-3714 • iISA LLL~4) 505-1575 lax (714)'05.1670 TO Chavman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, City Planner BY• Warren Morelion, Assistant Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16009 - RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION -The subdivision of 4.86 acres of land into 4 parcels in the General Industnal Distract (Subarea 13), located at the southeast corner and southwest corner of 6th Street and Charles Smith Avenue -APN• 229-263-05 and 229-283-04 and 05. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2002-00751 RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION -The development of 4 industrial bwldings totaling 54,662 square feet on 4 86 acres of land in the General Industnal Distract (Subarea 13), located at the southeast corner and southwest corner of 6th Street and Charles Smith Avenue -APN 229-263-05 and 229-283-04 and 05. BACKGROUND The item was originally scheduled for the December 11, 2002, Planning Commission meeting At the request of the applicant, the item was continued three times (December 11, 2002, January 8, 2003, and February 26, 2003) until March 26, 2003, in order to address the limits of off-site public improvements associated with the protect At the time this report was written, the applicant was still in negotiations with the Engineering Division to resolve outstanding issues Attached for reference is the February 26, 2003, staff report (Exhibit "B"). CONDITION OF APPROVAL AMENDMENT: At the request of the applicant, the requirement to align Charles Smith Avenue north of 6th Street with Charles Smith Avenue south of 6th Street has been deleted by the Engineering Division as a condition of approval RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve Tentatve Parcel Map SUBTPM16009 and Development Review DRC2002-00751 through the adoption of the attached Resolute of Ap h conditions and issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration Bra er City Planner Attachments Exhibit "A" - Letter dated February 26, 2003, requesting a third continuance to March 26, 2003 Exhibit "B" - Planning Commission Staff Report dated February 26, 2003 Draft Resolutiou~ of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16009 Draft Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2002-00751 Exhibit "C" ~~C' ~' Feb 26 03 04r47p C~k BuqueE 9011924 ~ Chaarl.es Joseuh Associates PUBLIClPRNATE SECTOR MANAGENEPrr SERVICES February 26, 2003 Brad Buller, City Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-0807 Re: Request for Continuance to March 26, 2003 - RKW Development Corporation - DRC2002-00750 and DRC2002-00751, SUBTPM78009 end SUBTPM18010 Dear Brad This is as a follow-up to our discussions with you, our diem and various Citir staff concerning the refererroed matter. Following our last corrtinuanoe request. our office has tleen meeting with City and Traffic Engineering concerning various Project improvement scope Issues While we have been successful with addressing some concerns in this regard, our diem fs currently assessing the finandad impacts associated with recent modification of the recommended conditions and how they cerrelate to the overall project infrastructure costs. Based upon the foregoing, we are requesting a continuance of the referenced Project heariruJ items to March 26, 2003, which will allow our dletrt bo complete his finandal impact assessment adnrrtY• We have been working m try to establish a reasonable nexus of improvement requirements proportionate to the scale and scope of the projects contemplated by our d'rent. The continuing professional courtesy extended by the City in this regard Is most app~~should ou~havel arty questons or~need of Cditional errformation or oPporhlnitY Y assistance with this matter. S(inc`ere~~y, ~~C./ 1 Charles J. Buquet Charles Joseph Associates Cc: Richard Wagner, RKW Development Jce O'Neil, City Engineer Jon Gillespie, City Traffic Engineer o~9o9wa1•-szz aar•za>•rsn I+»~H~-ast•isza Coy (;enter ~ 11)<811+ooth~0 AfveL, Swte 395 ~ Ruxho (;p~amtm~ CA ~ 917'iU A ('AI.IFt1RNIA ('()RM1RA7'I()N Fx~~~ b; ~ ~~ ~~~ G.;/~/.~ ~ ~G °I p.2 i T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff I~ol't DATE February 26, 2003 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, City Planner BY Warren Morelion, Assistant Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16009 - RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION -The subdivision of 4 86 acres of land into four parcels in the General Industrial District (Subarea 13), located at the southeast corner and southwest corner of 6th Street and Charles Smith Avenue -APN. 229-263-05 and 229-283-04 and 05 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2002-00751 - RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION -The development of four industrial buildings totaling 54,662 square feet on 4.86 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 13), located at the southeast corner and southwest corner of 6th Street and Charles Smith Avenue -APN• 229-263-05 and 229-283-04 and O5 BACKGROUND The item was originally scheduled for the December 11, 2002, Planning Commission meeting. At the request of the applicant, the item was continued until January 8, 2003, in order to address the limits of off-site public improvements associated with the protect. The item was continued again at the request of the applicant until February 26, 2003, to finish addressing the issues At the time this report was written, the applicant was still in negotiations with the Engineering Division to resolve the issues Attached is the December 11, 2002, staff report for your reference CORRESPONDENCE• On December 17, 2002, the Planning Division received a letter from the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) requesting a written response to air quality comments prior to certification of the Vineyards West and Vineyards East Final Negative Declarations The concern expressed by SCAQMD is that the protects are being treated separately, when it fact they are two phases of the same protect, and construction of the protects could overlap, creating adverse environmental impacts Analysis of environmental documentation shows that construction and operations of both protects together is below SCAQMD thresholds, with the exception of painting activities Conditions of Approval have been added to the protects to reduce the adverse impacts of painting to less than significant if the protects are developed concurrently On January 6, 2003, the Planning Division received a letter from the Department of Transportation informing staff that the applicanUdeveloper will be required to get a Caltrans encroachment permit prior to development of each protect site A Condition of Approval has Exhibit "D,. ~~C `0 ~~ LJ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM16009/DRC2002-00751 - RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION February 26, 2003 Page 2 been added to the protects requinng verification of an encroachment permit prior to issuance of building permits. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16009 and Development Revew DRC2002-00751 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions and issuance of a Mitigated Negative r)ar•.larafinn Brad Buller City Planner BB•W M/Is Attachments• Exhibit "A" - Letter dated January 8, 2003, requesting a second continuance to February 26, 2003 Exhibit "B" - South Coast Air Quality Management District Comment Letter dated December 11, 2002 • Exhibit "C" - Department of Transportation Comment Letter dated December 31, 2002 Exhibit "D" - Air Quality Analysis Exhibit "E" - January 8, 2003, and December 11, 2002, Staff Reports/Irntial Study Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16009 Draft Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2002-00751 ~1C \` Jan 08 03 05s20p C pk Buquet 80£ 11824 P•2 Charles Joseph Associ_..._ates ~ PUBLICJPRNATE SECTOR MANAl3EMENr SF1tVICES January 8, 2003 Brad Buller, City Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-0807 Re: Request for Continuance to February 26, 2003 - RKW Development Corporation - DRC2002-00750 and ORC2002-00751, SUBTPM76009 and SUBTPM16010 Dear Brad: This is as a folbw-up to discussions with our diem and various City stafT concerning the referenced matter. Following our last continuance request, our office ha§ been meeting with City and Traffic Engineering concerning various project improvement scope issues- While we have been successful with addressing a number of concerns in this regard, we are currently working out the remaining details with City Engineering for modification of the recommended renditions in order to allow our diem to be able to move forward with these small industrial Project6. . Based upon all the foregoing, we are requesting a continuance of the referenced project hearing items to February 28, 2003, which will allow us to complete our activity with the respective parties of interest We are continuing t0 work t0 be able to establish a reasonable nexus of improvement requirements that are proportionate to the wale and scope of the projects conttamplated by our diem. The continuing professional courtesy extended by the City in ttds regard is most appreciated by our diem Please feel free to contact me at Your earliest opportunity should you have any questions or need of additional infonrratlon or assistance with firs rrlatter. Sinwrey, Charles J. Buquet Charles Joseph Associates C~ Richard Wagner, RKW Development Joe O'Netl. Cily Engineer Jon Gillespie, City Traffic Engineer ort;~~•+avttru 800.240.18?2 rar9o9•as1.11na • -- (:mscr • 10681 IroothiU B1wL, Suite 395 • Rancho C.ueamoo~. CA • 91730 A (.NAY(MNIA UI1RM)RKrI()N Exhibit "A" ~/ac~/a3 ~ `C 1a ` • • ~. '- ,,~ ' ~. ~p ~ ~ South Coast District °FC cy~~U~gMo Air Quality Management ~,~ .r y 21865 E. Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4182 "' ' • ' (909) 396-2000 • www.agmd.gov 1 ~ ~ ~. . ,~~ FAXED: DECEMBER 11, 2002 - December 11, 2002 V/atren Morelion City of Rancho Cucamonga planning Division P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Dear Mr. Morelion: Negative Declarations (NDs) for The Vineyards West and The Vineyards East - Rancho Cucamonga The South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD) appreciates the opportunity to • comment on the above-mentioned documents. The following comments are meant as guidance for the Lead Agency and should be incorporated in the Final Negative Declaration. Please provide the AQMD with written responses to all comments contained herein prior to the certification of the Final Negative Declaration. The AQMD would be happy to work with the Lead Agency to address these issues and any other questions that may arise. Please contact Charles Blankson, Ph.D., Transportation Specialist -CEQA Section, at (909) 396-3304 if you have any questions regarding these comments. Sincerely Steve Smith, Ph.D. Program Supervisor, CEQA Section Planning, Rule Development & Area Sources Attachment SS: CB SBC021120-03 Control Number R 1C 13 Exhibit '~" a/z~/~.~ Warren Morelion • -2- .December 11, 2002 Negative Declaration (ND) for The Vineyards West and The Vineyards East - Rancho Cucamonga One Single Proiect: The AQMD has reviewed the negative declarations for the Vineyards East and West Projects and is unclear why the lead agency has prepared two separate CEQA documents for what appears to be a single project. The project proponent is the same individual for both proposed projects. The proposed projects are directly across the street from one another, and they both involve the subdivision of former agricultural land and the construction of industrial buildings. Further, on page 4 of Part 1 of the Initial Study for the Vineyards East project negative declaratioa it is stated, "The Vineyards East will be Phase II (The Vineyards West is Phase I)." This statement explicitly indicates that the two projects are related. It is not clear from the project whether construction phases overlap, but the project operation phases certainly overlap. It is, therefore, recommended that the lead agency recirculate a CEQA document that analyzes project-specific impacts from both components of the proposed project 2. Overall Proiect Imuacts: By treating the two phases of the proposed project as separate projects, the net effect is to reduce impacts to less than significant levels. For example, if construction for each phase of the proposed project overlaps, then VOC (ROG) emissions would exceed the daily VOC significance threshold. Similarly, since operation impacts from the two phases would clearly overlap, NOx emissions for both phases would exceed the daily NOx significance threshold. Unless the air quality impacts are mitigated to less than the significance thresholds identified in the draft • negative declarations, the proposed project does not qualify for a negative declaration. 3. Diesel Truck Emissions: At buildout the complete project covering 12.26 acres will be home to nine industrial buildings totaling 172,452 square feet. These industrial buildings will attract substantial truck traffic. CARB has designated diesel particulates as a carcinogen. Since the lead agency did not include the URBEMIS 2001 printout, it is difficult to determine how much of the operational PM~o emissions are generated by heavy-duty truck trips. Depending on the volume of truck traffic from the proposed project, the AQMD recommends that the lead agency perform an air toxics health risk analysis of the diesel truck emissions. The AQMD has prepared interim guidance for preparing such an analysis, which is available upon request. 4. Mitigation Measures: Since the air basin is in non-attainment for both the federal and state ozone, carbon monoxide and particulate matter (PMio) standards, it is important that the lead agency ensure the implementation of any measures which would help reduce any of these criteria pollutants The following measures are recommended for the lead agency to consider where applicable or feasible: Maintain equipment and vehicle engmes in good condition and in proper tune as per manufacturers' specifications. Require the use of alternative clean fuel such as compressed natural gas-powered equipment instead of diesel-powered engines, or if diesel equipment has to be ~ t C ~a • Warren Morelion • -3- .December 11, 2002 • used, use particulate filters and low sulfur diesel as defined in AQMD Rule 431.2, i.e., with less than I S ppm sulfur content. • Trucks hauling dirt, sand, gravel or soil are to be covered or should maintain at least two feet of freeboazd in accordance with Section 23114 of the California Vehicle Code. Pave pazking areas and construction access roads to the mam roads to avoid dirt being carried on to the roadway. • Use alternative-fueled yard tractors. Restrict idling emissions by using auxiliary power units and electrification. Enforce truck parking restrictions. • Restrict truck traffic on some routes. • Provide a minimum of 300-meter buffer zone between truck traffic and sensitive receptors. Redirect truck route to avoid residential areas or schools. • Improve traffic flow through signal synchronization. Provide elechical sources for service equipment and docking of trucks. • Use light-colored roof materials to deflect heat. Install solar panels on roof to supply electricity for air conditioning. • Use double-paned windows to reduce thermal loss. Install central water heating systems to reduce energy consumption, and Install energy-efficient apphances to reduce energy consumption. • 5. Editorial Comment: The lead agency should be aware that the negative declaration provrded to the AQMD for the Vineyazds West project did not include pages 2, 4, 6 and 7 of Part I of the Initial Study. r C. ~S OF CALIFORNIA-6USINESS. TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY GRAY DAMS, Govamor STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION . ; DISTRICT 8 464 W Fourth Street, 6~ Floor MS 726 San Bernardino. (:A 92401-1400 PHONE (909) 383-6327 FAX (909) 383-6890 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA December 31, 2002 08-SBd-15-PM 3.576 JAN 0 6 2003 Mr. Warren Morelion Planning Division City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Mr. Morelion, RECEIVED - PLANNING Preltminarv Site Plan for DRC2002-00751, SUBTMP 16009. RKW Development Corooration, Annlicant We have received the preliminarysite plans for the above project. This project proposes to subdivide a 4.86-acre vacant lot into four pazcels and the development of four industrial buildings totaling 54,662 square feet, located at the southwest comer of 6a' Street and the Interstatel5 (I-15) Freeway in the City . of Rancho Gyrcamonga. After further evaluation of the preliminary site plans, we found that the proposed off-site improvements do encroach onto the existing I-15 Right-of--Way. Issuance of a Caltrans encroachment permit will be required. All work performed within State right-of--way shall be consistent with applicable design criteria per State Highway Design and Traffic Manuals, and relevant construction policies and practices. Review and approval of construction plans within the State right-of--way by Caltrans will be necessary prior to permit issuance. Information regarding permit application and submittal requirements maybe obtained at: Office of Permits California Department of Transportation 464 West Fourth Street, 6a' Floor, MS 619 San Bernardino, CA 92401-1400 (909) 383-4536 If you have any questions regazding this letter, please contact Mr. Kee T. Ooi at (909) 383-4149 for assistance. Sincerely, LINDA GRIIvIES, Chief • Office of Forecasting/IGR-CEQA Review Transportation Plannmg Division A \ C ~~ anent Permits-SBd. Co. Exhibit "C" ~/~G/~3 LILBURN CORPORATION . ~ ~ Date/Time: //~~~ To: ~~.1-C/~1 cc: Fax: [f 7'f .Z 8¢7 Phone: Fax: Phone: From: ~ f ~~ Pages. ~ Including Cover Sheet Subject: ~ I h, ~ .~/~ZCpZ ~O~f J~0 f 75~ C~ -Original will not follow. ~/ Original will folbw by: regtrlar mail / ovemighl mai / couiar / • Message: >4dded ~.p ~bofk ~r~~ecf s - ra.,~ acr--nabdel usl'~ a -b~ ~~ 17Z,45~2 ~ o~F ux~e ~t Dose anc/ rude n /~~~C ~ftp o -~ II~ 46 ~c.~es. ~ c' , w i-I'tt ~ ,~ .~ -~-y,e ~cce~ cn D-F ~tlnh~ aGhi/f-I-i~,C~.,ee nods ~ cci2s bclaW ~Q~~ -(~re5h..o(c{s~ ev>°,1-r d u.n~ Q~dx~. C~ue~io~.s ? ~~l f ~ in Na~- u Exhibit "~" a/~~/.~ Planning & Environmental Services ,~,~ ~~ .Page : 1 URBEMIS 2001 For Windows 6.2.2 File Name: <Not Saved> Project Name: Project Location: Warren South Coast Air Haein (Los Angeles area) SUMMARY REPORT (Pounds/Day - Summer) CONSTRUCTION EMISSION ESTIMATES PM10 S02 ROG NOX CO TOTAIS(lbe/day unmitigated) 81.06 52.12 1.21 24.80 5.06 TOTALS (lba/day, mitigated) 77.05 49.56 1.21 10.46 4.81 AREA SOURCE EMISSION ESTIMATES PM10 S02 ROG NOx CO TOTAIS(lbs/day unmitigated) 0.18 1.16 1.15 0.00 0.00 TOTALS (lbs/day, mitigated) 0.18 1.16 1.14 0.00 0.00 OPERATIONAL (VEHICLE) EMISSION ESTIMATES S02 ROG NOx CO pM10 TOTALS (ppd, unmitigated) 13.88 32.32 145.45 6.54 0.34 TOTALS (ppd, mitigated) 12.97 29.63 133.33 6.00 0.31 /"~ ~ ~ `~ Page: 2' URBEMIS 2001 For Windows 6.2.2 ~le Name: <NOt Saved> Project Name: Warren Project Location: South Coast Air Basin (Los Angeles area) DETAIL REPORT (Pounds/Day - Winter) Total Land Use Area to be Developed (Estimated): 8 acres Retail/Office/Institutional Square Footage: 172452 Single Family IInite: 0 Multi-family IIaite: 0 CONSTRUCTION EMISSION ESTIMATES Source Rte' Demolition - Site Grading 2.73 Conet. Worker Trips 0.45 Stationary Equip 0.34 Mobile Equip. - Gae 0.00 Mobile Equip. - Diesel 1.13 Architectural Coatings 75.96 Asphalt Offgaesing 0.45 TOTAI.S(lbe/day,unmiti9ated) 81.06 CONSTRUCTION EMISSION ESTIMATES Source ROG Demolition - 1te Grading 2.60 net. Worker Trips ~ 0.45 ationary Equip 0.34 Mobile Equip. - Gae 0.00 Mobile Equip. - Diesel 1.07 Architectural Coatings 72.16 Asphalt Offgassing 0.43 TOTALS (lbe/day, mitigated) 77.05 NOx CO PM10 S02 _ - 0.00 - 39.90 - 23.97 4.64 0.64 1.21 0.12 - 0.27 - 0.02 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 11.30 - 0.69 0.42 52.12 1.21 24.80 5.06 NOx CO PM10 S02 - _ 0.00 - 37.91 - 9.67 4.40 0.64 1.21 0.12 - 0.27 - 0.02 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 10.74 - 0.66 0.40 49.56 1.21 10.46 4.81 Construction-Related Mitigation Measures Soil Erosion Measures: Water Exposed Surfaces 2x Per Day Percent Reduction(ROG 0$ NOx 0$ CO Ok PM10 68$ S02 0$) Properly Maintain Equipment Percent Reduction(ROG 5$ NOx 5$ CO 5$ PM10 5$ S02 5$) Implement Water/Paved Road Measures: Water All Haul Ronde 2x Per Day Percent Reduction(ROG O$ NOx 0$ CO O$ PM10 3$ S02 0$) Reduce Speedo on IInpaved Ronde to 15 mph or lees Percent Reduction(ROG O$ NOx 0$ CO O$ PM10 70$ S02 0$) Mobile Equipment: Properly Maintain Equipment Percent Reduction(ROG 5$ NOx 5$ CO 5$ PM10 5$ S02 5$) Architectural Coatings: Uee Low VOC Coatings Percent Reduction(ROG 5$ NOx 0$ CO 0$ PM10 0$ SO2 0$) Asphalt Paving: Use Low VOC Asphalt Percent Reduction(ROG 5$ NOx 0$ CO 0$ PM10 0$ SO2 0$) /"'~ ~ C \ Page : 3' AREA SOURCE EMISSION ESTIMATES (Winter Pounds per Day, Unmitigated) ROG NOX CO PM10 SO2 Source Natural Gas 0.08 1.15 0.46 0.00 . Wood Stoves 0.00 0.00 0 00 0.00 00 0 0.00 0 00 Fireplaces 0.00 0.00 0.00 . . Landscaping - No winter emissions - - Consumer Prdcte TOTALS(lba/day,unmitigated) 0.00 0.08 - 1.15 - 0.46 0.00 0.00 AREA SOURCE EMISSION ESTIMATES CO pM10 502 Source ROG 08 0 NOx 1.15 0.46 0.00 - Natural Gas . 00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Wood Stoves . 00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fireplaces . Landscaping - No winter emissions - - Consumer Prdcte mitigated) OTALS (lbs/day 0.00 0.08 - 1.15 - 0.46 0.00 0.00 , T Area Source Mitigation Measures Central Water Heater: Cmrcl Si (ROG O Space Heat. St CO O.SR NOX O PM10 0.5~ SO2 0.53') . Percent Reduction . r~ LJ • A , c ao Page : 4' • UNMITIGATED OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS ROG NOX CO PM10 SO2 Warehouse 13.03 42.95 152.32 6.54 0.33 TOTAL EMISSIONS (lbs/day) 13.03 42.95 152.32 6.54 0.33 Includes correction for passby tripe. Does not include double counting adjustment for internal tripe. OPERATIONAL (Vehicle) EMISSION ESTIMATES Analysis Year: 2003 Temperature (F): 50 Season: Winter EMFAC Version: EMFAC2001 (10/2001) Summary of Land Uses: IInit Type Trip Rate Size Total Trips Warehouse 5.71 tripe / 1000 sq. ft. 172.45 984.70 Vehicle Assumptions: Fleet Mix: Vehicle Type Percent Type Non-Catalyst Catalyst Diesel 80 0 ht Auto 47.70 4.70 94.50 90 88 . 0.10 ~ ght Truck c 3,750 lbe 9.30 11.00 . 60 97 0.60 Light Truck 3,751- 5,750 3.20 1.80 . 20 79 8.30 Med Truck 5,751- 8,500 5.60 12.50 . Lite-Heavy 8,501-10,000 6.90 18.20 70 66 33.30 Lite-Heavy 10,001-14,000 7.20 0.00 . 2 Med-Heavy 14,001-33,000 12.00 9.10 00 0 100.00 Heavy-Heavy 33,001-60,000 7.90 0.00 . 0 00 100.00 Line Haul > 60,000 lba 0.00 0.00 . 0 00 100.00 Urban Bue 0.00 0 20 0.00 90.90 . 9.10 0.00 Motorcycle . 00 0 0.00 0,00 100.00 School Bue . 0 00 0.00 100.00 0.00 Motor Home . Travel Condi tions Resident ial Commercial Home- Home- Home- work Shop Other Commute Non-Work Customer Urban Trip Length (miles) 11.5 4.9 6.0 10.3 5.5 5.5 Rural Trip Length (miles) 0 40.0 40 40.0 Trip Speedo (mph) 35.0 40.0 40.0 . 3 of Trips - Residential 20.0 37.0 43.0 9 of Tripes - Commercial (by land use) 2 0 1.0 97.0 Warehouse J ~ ,~ a~ Page : 5' MITIGATED OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS ROG NOx CO Warehouse 11.95 39.37 139.63 TOTAL EMISSIONS (lbs/day) 11.95 39.37 139.63 OPERATIONAL (Vehicle) EMISSION ESTIMATES Analysis Year: 2003 Temperature (F): 50 Season. Winter EMFAC Version: EMFAC2001 (10/2001) Summary of Land Uses: Unit Type Warehouse Vehicle Assumptions: Fleet Mix: Vehicle Type Light Auto Light Truck < 3,750 lbs Light Truck 3,751- 5,750 Med Truck 5,751- 8,500 Lite-Heavy 8,501-10,000 Lite-Heavy 10,001-14,000 Med-Heavy 19,001-33,000 Heavy-Heavy 33,001-60,000 Line Haul > 60,000 lbs Urban Bus Motorcycle School Bus Motor Home Travel Conditions Trip Rate 5.71 tripe / 1000 sq. ft. Percent Type 47.70 9.30 3.20 5.60 6.90 7.20 12.00 7.90 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.00 Home- work Urban Trip Length (miles) 11.5 Rural Trip Length (miles) 11.5 Trip Speeds (mph) 35.0 } of Trips - Residential 20.0 Non-Catalyst 4.70 11.00 1.80 12.50 18.20 0.00 9.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 90.90 0.00 0.00 Residential Home- Home- Shop Other 4.9 6.0 4.9 6.0 40.0 40.0 37.0 43.0 } of Trips - Commercial (by land use) Warehouse PM10 SO2 6.00 0.30 6.00 0.30 Size Total Trips 172.45 984.70 Catalyst 99.50 88.90 97.60 79.20 72.70 66.70 27.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.10 0.00 100.00 Commute 10.3 10.3 40.0 2.0 Commercial Diesel 0.80 0.10 0.60 8.30 9.10 33.30 63.60 100.00 100.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 Non-Work CVStomer 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 40.0 90.0 1.0 97.0 r ~J A, ~ as Page : 6' ~IRONMENTAL FACTORS APPLICABLE TO THE PROJECT Pedestrian Environment 1.0 Side Walks/Paths: Few Destinations Covered 1.0 Stzeet Trees Provide Shade: Moderate Coverage 2 0 pedestrian Circulation Access: Some Destinations 3.0 Visually interesting Uses: Moderate Number and Variety 0.5 Street System Enhances Safety: Few Streets 0.5 Pedestrian Safety from Crime: Some Degree of Safety 1.0 Visually Interesting Walking Routes: Moderate Level 9.0 <- Pedestrian Environmental Credit 9.0 /19 0.5 <- Pedestrian Effectiveness Factor Transit Service 20.0 Transit Service: 15-30 Minute Bus within 1/4 Mile 20.0 <- Transit Effectiveness Credit 9.0 <- Pedestrian Factor 2g,p <-Total 29.0 /110 0.3 <-Transit Effectiveness Factor Bicycle Environment 5.0 Interconnected Bikeways: High Coverage ~p Bike Routes Provide Paved Shoulders: Most Major Destinations 0 Safe Vehicle Speed Limits: Most Malor Destinations 0.0 Safe School Routes: No Schools 3.0 Uses w/an Cycling Dastance• Large Number and Variety 1 0 Bike Parking Ordinance: Requires Unprotected Bike Racks 14.0 <- Bike Environmental Credit 14.0 /20 0.7 <- Bike Effectiveness Factor r~ u ~~~ a3 ,Page: 7 MITIGATION MEASURES SELECTED FOR THIS PROJECT (All mitigation measures are printed, even if ) ed use i . x the selected land uses do not constitute a m Transit Infrastructure Measures $ Trips Reduced Measure Credit for Existing or Planned Community Transit Service 15.0 15.0 <- Totals Pedestrian Enhancing Infrastructure Measures (Residential) $ Trips Reduced Measure Credit for Surrounding Pedestrian Environment Z 0 2_p c- Totals Pedestrian Enhancing Infrastructure Measures (Non-Residential) $ Traps Reduced Measure Credit for Surrounding Pedestrian Environment 2 0 2.0 <- Totals Bicycle Enhancing Infratructure Measures (Residential) $ Trips Reduced Measure Credit for Surrounding Bicycle Environment ~ 0 7,0 <- Totals Bike Enhancing Infrastructure Measures (Non-Residential) Measure $ Tripe Reduced Credit for Surrounding Area Bike Environment 5 0 5.0 <- Totals Operational Measures (Applying to Commute Trips) $ Trips Reduced Measure 0.0 <- Totala Operational Measures (Applying to Employee Non-Commute Trips) $ Trips Reduced Measure 0.0 <- Totals Operational Measures (Applying to Customer Trips) $ Trips Reduced Measure 0.0 <- Totals Measures Reducing VMT (Non-Residential) VMT Reduced Measure 0.0 Park and Ride Lots 0.0 <- Totals Measures Reducing VMT (Residential) VMT Reduced Measure 0.0 <- Totals R , ~ a~ Page: 8 Total Percentage Trip with Environmental Factors and ravel Mode Home-Work Trips Home-Shop Pedestrian 0.10 Transit 3.95 Bicycle 4.90 Totals 0.00 Reduction Mitigation Measures Trips Home-Other Trips 0.42 0.42 0.87 1.07 4.90 4.90 0.00 0.00 Travel Mode Work Trips Employee Trips Pedestrian 0.10 0.95 Transit 3.95 0.08 Bicycle 3.50 3.50 Other 0.00 0.00 Totals 0.00 0.00 J Customer Trips 0.95 3.95 3.50 0.00 0.00 ~,C. a5 Page: 9 Changes made to the default values for Construction The demolition option switch changed from on to off. The construction year changed from 2002 to 2003. The length of construction period changed from 250 to 150. The site grading max daily acreage estimate changed from to 2.0. The site grading annual days earth moving changed from 250 to 6. The site grading scraper total vehicles changed from to 1. The site grading roller total vehicles changed from to 1. The site grading roller hours/day changed from 8 to 4. The site grading motor grader total vehicles changed from to 1. The worker average trip length changed from 10 to 50. The worker construction year changed from 2002 to 2003. The asphalt acres to be paved changed from 1 to 6. The asphalt total days of paving changed from 10 to 35. The mobile diesel fork lift 175 HP total vehicles changed from to 1. The mobile diesel fork lift 175 HP hours/day changed from 8 to 4. The mobile diesel tracked loader total vehicles changed from to 1. The mobile diesel tracked loader hours/day changed from a to 2. The mobile diesel roller total vehicles changed from to 1. The mobile diesel roller hours/day changed from 8 to 4. The coatings nonresidential conversion factor changed from 2.0 to 1.5. The coatings number of days of painting changed from 20 to 60. Mitigation measure Soil Erosion Measures. Water Exposed Surfaces 2x Per Day:0 has been changed from off to on. Mitigation measure Properly Maintain Equipment: 5 has been changed from off to on. Mitigation measure Implement Water/Paved Road Measures: Water All Haul Roads 2x Per Day:0 has been changed from off to on. Mitigation measure Reduce Speeds on Vnpaved Roads to 15 mph or leas: 0 has been changed from off to on. Mitigation measure Mobile Equipment: Properly Maintain Equipment: 5 has been changed from off to on. Mitigation measure Architectural Coatings: Use Low VOC Coatings: 5 has been changed from off to on. Mitigation measure Asphalt Paving: Use Low VOC Asphalt: 5 hie been changed from off to on. Changes made to the default values for Area The wood stove option switch changed from on to off. The fireplcase option switch changed from on to off. Mitigation measure Central Water Heater: Cmrcl Space Heat. has been changed from off to on. Changes made to the default values for Operations The light auto percentage changed from 61.4 to 97.7. The medhtruckc5751585005percentagegchangedefromo7.26to 5063 2 The lite-heavy truck 8501-10000 percentage changed from 1.1 to 6.9. The lite-heavy truck 10001-14000 percentage changed from 0.3 to 7.2. The med-heavy truck 14001-33000 percentage changed from 1.1 to 12.0. The heavy-heavy truck 33001-60000 percentage changed from 0.7 to 7.9. The motorcycle percentage changed from 1.4 to 0.2. The school bus percentage changed from 0.1 to 0. The motorhome percentage changed from 0.7 to 0. The operational emission year changed from 2002 to 2003. The default/nodefault travel setting changed from nodefault to: nodefault • Side Walks/Paths: No Sidewalks changed to: Side Walks/Paths: Few Destinations Covered Street Trees Provide Shade: No Coverage Ae..a~ Page: 10 changed to:Street Trees Provide Shade: Moderate Coverage ~estrian Circulation Access: No Destinations changed to:Pedestrian Circulation Access: Some Destinations Visually Interesting Uses No Uses within Walking Distance changed to:Visually Interesting Uses: Moderate Number and Variety Street System Enhances Safety: No Streets changed to: Street System Enhances Safety Few Streets Pedestrian Safety from Crime: No Degree of Safety changed to:Pedestrian Safety from Crime: Some Degree of Safety Visually Interesting Walking Routes: No Visual Interest changed to:Visually Interesting Walking Routes: Moderate Level Transit Service: Dial-A-Ride or No Transit Service changed to: Transit Service: 15-30 Minute Bus within 1/4 Mile Interconnected Bikeways: No Bikeway Coverage changed to: Interconnected Bikeways: High Coverage Bike Routes Provide Paved Shoulders: No Routes changed to:Bike Routes Provide Paved Shoulders: Most Major Destinations Safe Vehicle Speed Limits: No Routes Provided changed to:Safe Vehicle Speed Limits: Most Major Destinations Uses w/in Cycling Distance. No Uses w/in Cycling Distance changed to.Uses w/in Cycling Distance: Large Number and Variety Bike Parking Ordinance: No Ordinance or Unenforceable changed to.Hike Parking Ordinance: Requires Unprotected Bike Racks ~~ A, ~ a~ T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE January 8, 2003 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, Clty Planner BY Warren Morellon, Assistant Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE SUBTPM16009 - RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION - PARCEL MAP The subdivision of 4 86 acres of land Into four parcels In the General Industnal Dlstnct (Subarea 13), located at the southeast corner and southwest comer of 6th Street and Charles Smith Avenue -APN 229-263-05 and 229-283-04 and 05 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2002-00751 - RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION -The development of four Industnal buildings totaling 54,662 square feet on 4 86 acres of land In the General Industnal Dlstnct (Subarea 13), located at the southeast comer and southwest comer of 6th Street and Charles Smith Avenue -APN 229-263-05 and 229-283-04 and OS BACKGROUND The applicant requested a continuance of the Item to the January 8, 2003, Planning Commission meeting In order to address the limits of off-site public improvements associated with the protect To date, the applicant has been In negotiations with the Engineering Division to resolve the issues Attached Is the December 11, 2002, staff report for your reference RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16009 and Development Review DRC2002-00751 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions and Issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declara Brad Bu er City Planner BB WM/~c Attachments Exhibit "A" - Letter dated December 11, 2002, requesting a continuance Exhibit "B" - December 11, 2002, Staff Report Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16009 Draft Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2002-00751 Exhibit "E„ ~ ~ ~ as Deo 11 02 OSt07p ~ok BuqueL 8811824 ~ Charles Joseph Associates 1'URIJGPRNATE 8EC'TO(i MAIrAGEYprr S~ Decernber 11, 2002 Brad Buller, City Planner Crty Of Rancho CUCdnlCnga P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91728.0807 Re; Request for Continuance to January 8, 2003 - RKW pevr;lopmettt Corporation - DRC2002-00750 and DRC2002-00751 Dear Brad: This is as a follow up to discussions with our dierK. City stag` and you this afternoon conoeming the referenced matter. As we discussed, our office was recently retained id assist with this project. Review and evaluation of the n~commended conditions of approval as they pertain to street improvemer>ts w8h our diets has determined that the project, as recommended, is not feasible due m the costs assodated for the conditioned improvements. We are currently working with City Engineering to determine what modifications can be made with the current recommended ocr4ditiorls in order to allow our d4errt to 6e able m move forward with these srrrafl indrrbtrial Projects. ' Based upon all the foregoing, we are requesting a continuance of the referenced Project hearing items; t0 January 8, 2003, which will allow tw TA comP~ our remedial activity with the respective Parties of interest We are truly hoping b be able to establish a r~sonable nexus of improveme~~ u~1 lated by our dbrrt at proportionate m the scale and scope of the Project these locations. 'the continuing professional courtesy extended by the City in this regard is most appndated by our dent Please feel free to corrtad me at your cattiest opportunity should you have any questions or need of additional inforrrration or assistan0e vvitlr this matter. Slncerefy, Charles J. Baguet Charles Joseph pssociaties ~; Richard Wagner, RKW Development Dan James, City Engirreering ~rt~9n9.4m•tszz eoo•'t,+o•lazt F.i909M6t•t8Z4 Cay Ccnter • 106141 Fvttntri0 Bbd. Suitt 895 • ka,.d~, C ~%A • 91T.t0 A f:NLI)IU'11A ObRM)RA'17ON p.2 f H E C I T Y O F RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE December 11, 2002 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM• Brad Buller, Clty Planner BY Warren Morellon, Assistant Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16009 - RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION -The subdivision of 4 B6 acres of land Into four parcels In the General Industrial District (Subarea 13), located at the southeast corner and southwest corner of 6th Street and Charles Smith Avenue -APN. 229-263-05 and 229-283-04 and 05 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2002 00751 - RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION -The development of four industrial buildings totaling 54,662 square feet on 4 86 acres of land In the General Industnal District (Subarea 13), located at the southeast corner and southwest corner of 6th Street and Charles Smith Avenue -APN: 229-263-05 and 229-283-04 and 05 A Surrounding Land Use and Zoning North - Vacant Land, General Industnal (Subarea 13) South - Industnal and Office Budding, General Industnal (Subarea 13) East - I-15 Freeway West - Vacant Land and Industnal Building, General Industnal (Subarea 13) B General Plan Deslonatlons: Protect Slte - General Industnal North - General industrial South - General Industrial East - Generallndustrial West - Generallndustrial C Slte Characteristics The protect site encompasses three vacant parcels at the southeast and southwest corners of 6th Street and Charles Smith Avenue One parcel Is located on the west side of Charles Smith Avenue, and two parcels are located on the east side. The site Is bordered by one office and one Industnal building to the south, the I-15 Freeway to the east, and vacant land to the north and west. Two residential homes and a number of mature trees exist on the site The residential homes have been determined to be non- historic and are proposed to be removed as part of the development Access Into the site Is from Charles Smith Avenue ^ `n ~~ C~ Exhibit "F" PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SU BTPM 16009/DRC2002-00751 . December 11, 2002 Page 2 D Parkino Calculations Number of Number of Square Parking Spaces Spaces Tvoe of Use Footac,~e Ratio Required Provided Building 1 16,196 Office 1,600 1/250 64 Warehouse 2,946 1/1000 30 Manufacturing 11,650 1/500 23 3 Total 33.0 36.0 Bwldmg 2 17,537 Offer 2,000 1/250 8 0 Warehouse 3,337 1/1000 3 3 Manufacturing 13,200 1/500 26 5 Total 38 41.0 • Bwldmg 3 12,612 Office 1,200 1/250 48 Warehouse 2,312 1/1000 2 3 Manufacturing 9,100 1/500 18 3 Total 25.0 27.0 Building 4 8,317 Office 800 1/250 3.2 Warehouse 1,517 1/1000 15 Manufacturing 6,000 1/500 12 0 Total 17.0 18.0 ANALYSIS A General The protect, "The Vineyards West," consists of four industrial bwldings that range in size from 8,317 square feet to 17,537 square feet The applicant proposes to divide the three parcels into four parcels that range from 50-acre to 1 2 acres in size The bwldings have been designed with one cohesive architectural style that includes painted tilt-up concrete with a sandblasted accent treatment that is used on all sides of each bwlding The office portions of the buildings have glass, column treatments, entry archways (Buildings 2 and 3 only), and metal canopies and protections that make them easy to identify The design of the buildings includes truck-loading areas with roll-up doors on the rear/sides of the buildings Bwldmg 4 is the only bwlding that includes a dock high door truck well The loading areas are screened from view with decorative screen walls ~ `n 3` PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT S U B T P M 16009/D R C2002 -00751 December 11, 2002 Page 3 The protect is located next to the I-15 Freeway where it is highly visibly from public wew As a result, the bwldmgs have been designed so that all roof-mounted egwpment is screened from the elevated freeway Because of the protect's location, landscaping within the freeway ~ght-of- way or an in-lieu of construction cash deposit for future development wdl be regwred Accompanying this protect is another proposal (Tentative Parcel Map SUPTPM16010 and Development Rewew DRC2002-00750 - °The Vineyards East°) for five industrial bwldmgs on the east side of the I-15 Freeway The protect has been submitted by the same developer and is similar in architectural design B Design Rewew Committee The Design Rewew Committee (McNiel, Stewart, Coleman) reviewed the protect on November 5, 2002. The architect brought revised plans to the meeting that addressed all of the City's design rewew concerns, with the exception of the 5-foot minimum landscape planter regwred on the side yard of Buildings 1 and 2. The Committee discussed the issue and thought it would not be necessary in this case to require landscaping on the east side of Budding 2 because of the future landscaping of the freeway right-of-way required as part of protect approval The Committee also felt landscaping on the west side of Bwlding 1 would not be necessary because development of the parcel to the west would likely create enough landscaping on that side of the • building in the future The Committee recommended that the Planning Commission approve the revised protect C Technical and Grading Rewew Committees• The Techncal and Grading Committees reviewed the protect and recommended approval D Tree Removal Permit DRC2002-00836• On October 21, 2002, a Tree Removal Permit application was submitted for the removal of 65 mature trees on-site, as well as for one tree on °The Vineyards East" site. An arbonst report was completed (Jim Borer, October 30, 2002) that concluded none of the trees on-site were good candidates for preservation or relocation based on their condition and grading requrements, with the exception of one mature Canyon Oak tree (Quercus chrysolepsis) near 6th Street and Charles Smith Avenue The report excluded all fruit and nut bearing trees based on the City's l ree Preservation Ordinance A Condition of Approval for this protect will require the preservation in place or relocation on-site of the Oak tree, per the Murnapal Code Section 19 08 110 requirements E Environmental Assessment The applicant prepared Part I of the Initial Study. Staff completed Part II and determined that the protect could have a significant adverse environmental impact on short-term air quality dunng site grading The mitigations listed in the Initial Study Part II and the attached Resolution of Approval will reduce the short- term impact to less than significant. A number of focused Delhi Sands flower-loving fly (DSF) surveys were conducted by Impact Sciences from August 1999 to September 1999 on the three parcels that make up the protect site. The surveys showed no observation of . the DSF dunng the survey periods In addition, no other sign of recent DSF occupation was detected Further observation of the site showed characteristics that are not consistent with areas currently occupied by DSF populations because of ongoing exposure to weed abatement, disking, fertilizing, and pesticide applications The surveys R,c, 3a PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT S U BTP M 16009/D RC2002-00751 December 11, 2002 Page 4 determined that the overall insect diversity on the site was very low as compared to the sites dominated by native or weedy vegetation, and that important plant species indicative of potentially swtable DSF habitat were entirely absent Because of the site's exposure to soil disturbances, overall absence of indicator speces, and negative focused DSF survey results during the 1999 survey season, the surveys concluded that the site does not likely support a DSF population, and development of the site will not impact endangered, threatened, or rare species or their habitats. A cultural evaluation of the iwo structures on the site was conducted by McKENNA et al (July 25, 2002). The study determined that there was no evidence of significant historic resources within the protect area, and that the proposed project, as defined, wdl not result in any adverse impacts to cultural resources. The report concluded that no further studies were warranted at this time. However, if in the future, previously unidentified resources were identified, a qualified archaeologist must be notified and the resources be evaluated for significance with respect to State gwdelines. CORRESPONDENCE. This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were marled to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the project site RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16009 and Development Review DRC2002-00751 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions. Respe t9 su Br er Planner BB WM/1c Attachments• Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "B" - Tentative Parcel Map Exhibit "C" - Site Plan Exhibit "D" - Grading Plan Exhibit "E" - Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit "F" - Building 1 Elevations Exhibit "G" - Budding 2 Elevations Exhibit "H" - Building 3 Elevations Exhibit "I" - Building 4 Elevations Exhibit "J" - November 5, 2002, Design Review Action Comments Exhibit "K" - Irntial Study Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16009 Draft Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2002-00751 P<,C 33 m x as :~ D N • PRo~E~ct s~cE SITE UTILIZATION MAP ~` IbTE EXISTING ZONING FOR PROJECT SNE 6 EW RADIUS ~ IS GENEP.IL INDU51RdL (G I) 1 0 25 50 100' ~ +P • THE VINEYARDS WEST TENTATIVE TRACT NO.16009 ~ ~4{e ~ ~a e C i~~ ~;~' 3 e ~ ~~~s~ ~ l,t S ~~uli~i J ~gA~ ~ v ~hfQ ~ li61 fib} d i~9~ 9 ~ i~~iig ~ M,i g i • ~ 1 !~ ~ ~ ~ ~. N ~ .i i.l; $1_ ee11~~. ir~ ~n p~p ~_~ rr i~, ~d ~ii li~.ij gg~i! ~~! Iii 1'17bs, Il~ii ii~~i~~ ~e~ei~~l ., t Exhibit B m K 3 C' a Z; i n ' I I N ~ D' ~~ W W PER CAl TRANS ROW MAP 401582 PG 2 STATE HIGHWAY 15 rr __ ii morel ~ - VACANT~NNEYAPp-~~ ~p.~sw~ . PROTECT DATA ~~__ ___ ~~ ~~l ~- VICINITY MAP ,,, ~ 01-p j 1 2 3 / TOTAL I ~~ ____-__- __ _-__~ - __ ____I} I ___ an asi - ___ zesre ___ _ 6IW MiA I lal%S__ p~RQ~__ _______ _ __- __ I1 a]14 _ _- I}Ali e]I) _-__ ~ __ 5,6YY __ _ -__ I avcE®wo3 ~ Imrm-a. z%oen•a l IZp'YA-te emro•]}' MWFICIIIW'@IiSD]$ II Z)Sp' .PJ] I]d1'S%•}as &ImYp•la] 60.O'f0•li WNEIgI&®f1I000S 29MI,Lm=10 11A18.Q0•Jl 2D2'IAA•}2 ISnIIAW tf ]OTKRpJFp I llSPIRA ]a I }] 11 j IIIaPYF3 v]RU]pRaAVm %marts n n nl mmrrFs wAffinluEAR:dACp ___ . __ _snos - ein _ rm - :all - naasnxrEn V:ICECYCEM.a R101LE6 _ _ _ fiPAS _ _ It/gl _ 6,9%I alA~ PtH4Ra]~N~ 2aa _ _ OY OY I 0]1 _ OY' OE 4i~9pIlMiaEIAiYII Nb V®4fw M4WOA®S 0.1a w®IIFd E®Sf V ~aLP4~4M W ~EAAIwCfAVW iVZS cERERAl NOTE$ 1$EECQMT-IWLU]a]ffARNDWVlIIGaIN4epR WYIC'IV1 afCNARYI i sca Ir+lmcroecw}uKwxrtoaaTUESwrtxswvartus rolioa Avlc THE VINEYARDS WEST Rancho Cucamonga, Callfornla RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 1p0RR RU6MMORE UWE BAMAANA, CA 9R}OS TEL (}t<)505-1375 ATTN RIC2IARDK WADNER f MANUFACTURIND USE ILDG 4 ,317 SF Ra cLRAR .--EnsnNC aRCE aundnc 1 ,waq J~aewaArtsA °w SITE PLAN \J Al • • • ~ ~ ;,~ I~;~i ,fi ~;;;~ ~~ i h ~~ ~~ ;; s ~;'ti; I I e ,,, ~ 11$ i ~ '' i ~;~ ~~ ~;, i ~ ;i i '' i ' ~ ~ ,, ~i~~~i !~~~~' ~ ~ LLN~~ O H ~¢O~~ LL ,~ ~,; ~I I ' ' I i t. ~~i i . .., , ~' I}' ' ' ~: w ~ I ~ li~~i I ~~~~~ e; i ~~ I ~ i~~ ,, '~ 'I' i ~~i i ~I, ~~ r ~~ ~p r IR ~~ ~~p ~i ~~ ., ~_ _ ~ i ~a ~~~~ a~ !! ii u 1 ~~~!~ ~ 1~~~ ,; ~,. ~~~ :~~~ ~;li; i~,~-., ~.;i(~ ~~ ~~ ~n ~~ i -. ~~ tl ~. .~ l t Exhibit "D" /~/~~~°~- 1~~C 3`~ • • ~~ s~ ~~ ~~ ~~ t ~ i; ~ c.~~ ~ _t Aroma A,c3~ ~~ ~< °..;.::~o,~~ ""'«w..-» « .... , a.;:.;,~:: =*.LS3M S(IN VA7NIA 3H,1 ~ :l0 6 ~ -' 3JV ri0Ntl N31V'1H Jil~l)1N3t1JUlj,\34\\VN # ~+ a. uonuv~n~nvwvi mnd f ~ ~$I` aaa aaaa ~+a . 39 1 ~~ ~i i R~' Si}~lia~ I~ 3; ~i~1f Ei a ;f I ~ I~~~I~~~~ ~~ € ~ ~ ~~ iiii~i~i f~9g@~~ so ~affl~f: ~ ifa~~ii~ ~~~ ~ ~~ i ~I S1 ~ 1 i i ~ ~ i~ I~ ~ ®®r~~:~ it ~ ~~ ~ 3I ~ ~ ! e ! F f ~ ~1 y 1i ~ 1 ~~ ~f ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ w ~ if ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ _ J p Exhibit "E" iz/~~/ol ~~ a} mQ ~3 s= aU' a= 3F oQ zN U a 1 F I ~ - \ V ~ ~ ~ i =W ~~ ` _____ ~ ' _ __ 2 ~ // .~3 T i --------- -- 133!l1SHl9 -- ~~ m x m 0 N 1 O - ~- i c -- - • C~~9 , CRNS WAV ..J aI NORTH (eTHST) .~-~-.,~ al • ~~~ ~M ~,m,.,. ...,....,. ~, _ ,. Ea.~ .~, ~a.R,. W...a,a„ SOUTH _ __--__ _...._..~. J ~,;MR~' ,,.~ ~,bH~„1~.. ,~...,~~ THE VINEYARDS WEST RanchoCucemonga, Califomla BLDG.1 ELEVATIONS IFE 6 SAKAHARA RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ^~IT~ Nn 1382] RUSMMORE LANE BANTA RNA, CA 92)08 a w TEL p1a1506-15)6 I11.~J iu . ICHARO K WACNER w "'~ ~ ~ a ~ ~~ YAVa p W,M1m ~ • 1~ EAST (CHARLES SMITH) ErnRV ..~ l d m x s rt a N ~nn 1r r r~ LJ ~~ ~~ ~.. ®..e . , , EsaR Atw~ewA xn vAR~wa THE VINEYARDS WEST RanchoCucamon0a, cenrort,ie RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 13892 RUSHMORE LANE SANlA ANA, CA 92)06 TEL (!10)505-15]5 ATTN RICHARCH WAONER ~.ru BLDG. 2 ELEVATIONS ~YTSm~T~a V]pb r00.~0-af m x s a a 0 r D\ l ~ nL 7C/ -~w -.~-.~ ~-BLIX3 2 DRNE WAV a:e BlD9 ~-. a ~~~~~~~~ VIIEST (CHARLES SMfTH) sl ~7VY~n • wean uava ~~ ®~ m q.m.~ as GD ~.,,o.~.... THE VINEYARDS WEST Rancho Cucamonga, CellTOmla RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 13822 RUBNMORE IANE SANTA ANA, CA 92]05 p1A1S08-18]8 RICHAR K WA(3NER ~.~ BLDG. 3 ELEVATIONS u:E 6 SAKNIARA AROIITCCTS AU nwe ~'»•oo-~em n-Im A4 ~ -- nvn~n EAST (rlwv ~ s) _. m x a rt N L W HMV/ 16 rwA _ ~.~. r..uu ~ aa.... l o..a.e.. -• EN>RV - u•r c.o~ SMITH NORTH c~6 `7 r!-1 ~~~~~~' ~ • flL00 ~I ,~ 4 TYP. BLDG. SECTION "OR VINEYARDS WEST) ~~A~A.~ ~.. ®s m ..,, . ®.~ ®~. ..~, EAST (HWy f s) THE VINEYARDS WEST Rancho Cucamonga, California RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 13694 RUSNMORE LONE SAMA ANA, G 89905 TEL [/14)505-15>5 ATTN flICHARO K WAONER APKC oPaox AeneNa TEM PIA!EL MM BLDG. 4 ELEVS & TYP SECT vxwe oe-•eoa ~ svurn ~ C~ DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 8.30 p.m Warren Morelion November 5, 2002 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16009 -RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION - The subdroision of 4 86 acres of land info four parcels in the General Industrial District (Subarea 13), located at the southeast corner and southwest comer of 6"' Street and Charles Smith Avenue - APN• 229-263-05; 229-283-04 and 95 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2002-00751 -RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION -The development of four mdustnal buildings totaling 54,662 square feet on 4 86 acres of land m the General Industrial District (Subarea 13), located at the southeast comer and southwest corner of 6th Street and Charles Smith Avenue - APN: 229-263-05.229-283-04 and 05 Design Parameters The protect site is located on three vacant parcels at the southeast and southwest corners of 6"' Street and Charles Smith Avenue One parcel is located on the west side of Charles Smith Avenue, and two parcels are located on the east side. The applicant intends on subdividing the two parcels on the east side into three parcels. The site is bordered by one office budding and one mdustnal budding to the south, the 1-15 Freewayto the east, and vacant land to the north and west Access into the site will be from Charles Smith Avenue. Two residential homes exist on-site, that have been determined non-historic, and are proposed to be removed as part of this development The protect, "The Vineyards West," will consist of four mdustnal budding ranging m size from 8,317 square feet to 17,537 square feet. Accompanying this protect is another proposal (SUBTPM16010/DRC2002-00750) for five industrial buildings on the east side of the I-15 Freeway, "The Vineyards East " Both protects have been submitted bythe same developer and are similar in design. The four mdustnal buildings have been designed with one cohesive architectural style that includes painted tilt-up concrete with a sandblasted treatment The sandblasting is used substantially on Bwldings 2 and 4, primarily at the base of the budding, and sparingly on the base of Buildings 1 and 3 To enhance the building designs, the office areas on alt the buildings include glass and column treatments to make them easier to identify. The protect went through a Preliminary Review (DRC2002-00241) with staff and has addressed many of the issues identified One of the main concerns mentioned was the location of the protect as it relates to the I-15 Freeway and the need for attractive screening of work, loading, and storage areas, as well as all roof and ground mounted egwpment from freeway views Staff Comments The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Major Issues The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this protect The protect is located on the southeast and southwest corners of 6th Street and Charles Smith Avenues where it is highly visible from the raised I-15 Freeway Ultimately, slope piantmg along the freeway will provide some screening A sight line section through the I-15 Freeway travel lanes has not been provided The Commdtee should discuss the different options of screening that best suits the proposed development. Per Development Code requirements, all roof, wall, and ground-mounted egwpment shall be screened from all sides and architecturally integrated into the budding designs. t. A ~ y~ `' J ii/i~/o~ ~ ~_~ DRC COMMENTS • SUBTPM16009 & DRC2002-00751 - RKW DEV CORP • November 5, 2002 Page 2 Secondary Issues Once all of the mator issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues Buildings 1 and 3 have been designed with substantially less sandblasting treatment than Building 2 and 4, however, staff believes that this vanety provides an overall appearance for the protect consistent with the City's Design Gwdelmes The sandblasting treatment is located primarily at the base of the buildings To increase its visibility, sandblasting should be higher on elevations where it is visible. 2. Provide decorative textured paving at protect entnes 3 A 5-foot minimum landscape planter is required in the side yard of comer lots (Buildings 1 and 2) Due to the screening provided by the I-15 Freeway of Bwldmg 2's east elevation, this is more of an issue along the west elevation of Bwldmg 1 Policy Issues The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the protect design without discussion. Provide tables and chairs/benches in employee lunch/eating areas 2. Provide bicycle parking/racks as part of protect design . Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends the Committee approve the protect subtect to the above-mentioned comments Design Review Committee Action. Members Present John Mannerino, Pam Stewart, Dan Coleman Staff Planner Warren Morelion The architect brought revised plans to the meeting to address all of the above-mentioned comments, except for the 5-foot minimum landscape planter requred on the side yards of Buildings 1 and 2 The Committee liked the revisions that were done and recommended the protect be forwarded to the Planning Commission for review and action with the following additional comments. The Committee thought it would not be necessary m this case to regwre landscaping on the east side of Building 2 because of the future landscaping of the freeway right-of-way 2 The Committee also felt that landscaping on the west side of Bwldmg 1 would not be necessary because development of the parcel to the west would likely create a landscape planter on that side of the building in the future i ~, c ~5 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM CAy of Randro Cucamonga (Part I -Initial Study) Poannnq Orvuron (909)477-2750 INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. Please note that d rs the responsrbrlrty o/the applicant to ensure that the applicahon rs comp/ete at the hme o/ submittal, Crty stet/ will not be evadable fo perform work required to prowde mrssrng mformabon Apphcabon Number for the pro/ed to which this Pomi pertains Pro/ect Title Name 8 Address of pro/ecl owner(s) PLEAsE SEE ATTACI-fEl~ Name 8 Address o/ developer or pro/ect sponsor ((kV~/ DEVELOPMEnJT Co-iMORA-T/0%J P o Rox 37 z4 TusT//J~ CA 9Z7~I -372 u Contact Person 8 R I C H /1 fQ D K• W A G E R Address 13 6 2. z R fJSff MO K E ~--~"N E- Sf4 AJTF1 /l-tU f}~ Cf~ 9z 7'D.S • Exhibit "K" ~z/~~/U2 ,A ~C ~~ • v~ Name 8 Address of person prepanng this form (d ddferent from above) SR M ~ Telephone Number ~7/If-~ ,$~~.s~ ~-s 7-~ Information md~cated by astensk (') rs not required of non-construction CUPS unless otherwise requested by sfafl '1) Provide a full scale (&1/1 x 11) copy o/the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the pm~ect sde, end mdlcate the sKe boundanes 2) Provide a set o/color photographs which show representative wows into the site from the north, souM, east and west views into and from the sde hom the pnmary access points which serve the site, end representative wows of srgnrfi'cant (eaturss /rom the sde InGude a map showing location of each photograph 3) Pm/ecl Location (descnbe) ,S' W R N D ,$ E C OIQ A) E k. S D l ~ h't~' ST , f}IIJD GDtA i2LES S M /TH RV E. 4) Assessor-s Parcel Numbers (attach addrtona/ sheet d necessary)• APB 2z9 - zt; 3- o.s Ft r N z a. 9 - a. 8 3- o ~{• ~ a.s '5) Gross Sde Area (aclsq tt) 3. ~/ ~ ,: d ~ ~~ FiT ..P 4~ sc. 7Ct . ~6) Net Srte Area (total sde size minus area of public streets & proposed ded~cabons) ~, S 7 Q C ~ ~,S,Jr, 7)Descnbe any proposed general plan amendment orzone change which would affect the proled sde (attach addrtonal sheet d necessary NOnIE TD ay~ KNo cJL~D~,-E . `C ~~ i ~Di nl.lnn ul_~CI41~I ~CnD~AC11'rll IAITFD\IAIITCTrI~ \A/Drl 7/nn D~..~ e 8)Include a descnpt~on of all permits which will be necessary from the Gry of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies in order to fully implement the pro/ed DDS/~/J R~-V%EW ~' TEAITAT/!/E PARCEL MAP TIIE~ REMOVf}L - DEMOL/T/O~J~~ STREET VRCRT/Owl{ r-r~2 ae rwtr ~ BII/LD /wl~r - PLUMB/til(r~ ELEcTiz/cR-L,~ MF_Ch`II~(//CAL . mar-I~~ogcµm~T ~P~e~nIT 9) Descnbe the physical setting o/the site as d exists before the pm/ed mcludmg mtormabon on topography, sod stebdd}; p1aMs and animals, matuns trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspeds Descnbe any existing structures on sde (mdudmg age and crondi6on) and the use of the structures Attach photographs o/sgnficant features described In addfion, sde all sources of information (i e , geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and archeological surveys, traffic studies) TffE S IAf /tN.D S~ CAt2N E KS DF ~~ ST. w-nJb CfYR KLFS GSM /TN /rVE, CUKK.EAlTLf/ ~r}Cff fFRVE A-N OLG FAK'M- l~(oU3~ STRND/aJG, T/f~ s'.E CoftNcAZ X9/0? CN-/4KLES sA.t/T~~ /+oUSE (,l'A-S ~V/LT /N /c/2 3 /s GUKKENTLV /N DKPLpR.A-BLE CoNd/T/b~J . A~Nb /s .SC/fE~ULEA Td BE .DEMaL/slfF~ r /N CCTlTB ~lQ. ~.DO 2 Tff-F 1Fn Us6 Dw1 7-H-E S u / /SRN Fr¢. /J.~F 5 R)' MckEAliyl4~e t..~. Tut_Y a.s~ ~oaZ A-7TA-C#~ED !l-~R.F41/Tft~ TN E REM k-/u DE f2 eF T/f-E P/L.o P E,e"Y /s ttF V/itJE fit-A..~ CUIIRENTLy Fj~ K-n ED ICY GALLEhAJ n !~/NER Si. sa/L. i s AN EXGELL~LUT SRIJO ~ LO f} Ml ~So/ts /lEPoftT QY S/D 1r60 - T 6"CNlJ/cf4L/ ~uC. ~ TUAJE ,ZDD ~.~_ VA-K 3 /ous G/fFLAI UT Tft~ES ~ A-N~ ?UIJ / PEI(,S SURROU AJ~ TN-E 7-GlQ J>'oUS~S. 10)Descnbe the known cultural and/orhrstoncal aspects of the sde Sde all sources ofmformabon (hooks, pubbshed reports and oral history) SEE ~ C U~ TU /C A-L ff/s y"D R '/ B P-C k G R a vrv ~ /N /~7rac/t,E'A l-l~/_rTUfllG STR Uc7'URES FURLUAT/~nl BS/ MCK~.vNA, .~ C $ a ~ D R-7 ~ D St1 L_ S~ 2s', nD .Z . ~ ~ C y~ i ~Pi 4NNINf;1FINAl \F(1RMS\COUNTER\INITSTt11 VJPfI 9/t1n Pann a ~U/LT /IV 1934- , /FnJA /s /N 7"/f'E SRM~. CoiU.D/T76wJ. rT ~ PrT 9~/o C-bt"r41ZLES SM /Tlf . f~1~JD ry/~L BE ,D6HoLJSdF-.b /N 11)Descnbe any noise sources and their levels that now affect the site (aircreft, roadway noise, efc) and how they Kell at/ect proposed uses T/iF .s/rte is ADSAGF_,ilT TD S- /S , aJ/TtF ~-res ~/,rED APpKOX. ~n Tb zS r`EET PrBOVE T7tE S/TE. ,PO/4.D ill0/sue FRO~.t rH-~ FKEF_W/#Y ~/}t vtlDT S~S~J MEA-SUK.€Q . RNA NUISE WILL NL7j' F~~G7' 7~ fl/ebA7S~~ (J$~ 12)Descnbe the proposed pm/eel m dated 7h~s should pmvrde an adequate descnpdon of the site m terms o/ ultimate use which will result hom the proposed pro/act Indicate d there are proposed phases for development the extent o/development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion o/each increment Aftach additional sheet(s) l/necessary• PffkSE 1 W/~L BE THE V/NE yfFI~DS GIES T - A 4- 8U/[_Ai./!r L.I fr6J T SN ~s vSTK r r4-L PIFIt. K GD/JS/S T/Al rs of ' /6r /q~ s~ ,of- ~ /`If ~i38'spffr 1216/~S~f~f- hti1.D 8.3/7S~,~f, ~~tJ TfYE GIEsT' Si.b~ ~F ~-/S /ET THE SW ANd SE. CoRn.16t2s dF ~~ S'7; h~NA C#AIC~FS SM /7-fl R-JE , CLEAR /fE/GNTS 4J/LL /1RN ~E FROM 21J F7: TD 2r{' FT- EAC N- SU/L.AlA1G lJ/L~ N-R VE ~P'RO K. (r, 00O SQTT aF OFF/cE SPr4-CE ~U/LOIN/.- 2 LrJ/LL ffAUE A-i.J h-n.b/T/Oti1r~L ~,ooo 5~~E- OF MEZZA•til/tiJE 0~;~/G~ SPRC~. /}Alb /il/L4 8E T/fE /ONLY 8U/c..b/N~ TD /f-ituE , Tu)a ~ADGk- ff/ T~eucK tJ ELLS CpM PL~7-/D .U /s' SGH-~~ uLE~ FnR 3~QTR, zoo3. PN-k•sF 2. cJ/LL 8E dnI Ttt~ ~R-sT s/.D~ o~T/f~ .~'-/S, A-IVD /s /k SEpA-KA•7`-E C/7 f~' SrI~aM/TI-A-L~ 13)Descnbe the surrounding propeRies, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, histoncal, or scenic aspects lndreate the type olland use (residential, commeroiel, etc.), intensity o/lend use (one-lamely, apaRment houses, shop6, department stores, etc) and scale of development (height /rontege, sefbadr, rear yaN, etc) 'rg -TAE tVDRT/f /s rf-~ Ste. ,~/Tff- R VRCA-xIT U/itIFY/Mi/? TO TN'6 Ido /27-1f DF TffE S77lEET T Tff~ ~1F'S'~j /s .Z~-~S. AG-0 6 TY~ Tff-~ So/ITH~ /s A- L/GrY'7- ~tcrAUsTn./A-L k3L-AG. w/TH o FG/G ~ SPfFCE , To T/f E GJ ~rT a F 8 G-a ~, ,Z /s f} VV/-~1G`/A~K~. R-erA TD Tff'E SaU7-~1 %s f} Mhl~)uFhGTUK/tJG Us.E. 14) wll the proposed pro/act change the pattern, scale or character of the surrounding general area of the pro/ectT tirn TH-E ly.~~lEaa/ PA-7T,EKitJ /4~/VA Sc,4LE /s u / ~/A ~~r.1T - L./ Gff'T rN~A UsTR/R-L A-rt/ D M /r~1 d GA~GTUR/ N(c,l WAl2Enffo/~I~SEq- /'t ~ C ~.,~ .. u.n.~n,nr.in~ ,enoe.ev`ni iniTC O~ienTCrn~ .mm~ omn n--- 15) Indicate the type of short-tens and long-term nose to be generated, rncludrng source and amount How wrll these nose levels affect adjacent properties and on-srte uses What methods of sound proofing are proposed? T/f~SE LJ/LL LSE .SPEGrILk'TitIE ~3U/L.a/a)~S ,L3V / LT >=o /f. SR LF A-a/~ L.Ef} S.E ~,~eyD SU,ST~'cT 7n M A le. K E T >co rl' C ~S _ G I B GtFDtI N D T ,D L T~ ,N iAr,~ AT T,Ef/S T/ME Us~/tS i}ND PoT~AJT//+L NO/sue G-EtJ,EIt~T/e n/. •16) lndreate proposed removals andror replacements of mature or scenic bees ~ f} ~ (_ E x /S T />/ (r TI~~Es SPI-RL_L .BF 14EMr~yED i4-s .5r~,ec-rkarriA L ~~ / M p 0 I2 T /S /F,UTrr ~ A ~r><D~ A" PR ~ L- / M / N A-fc r/ L~N.bsct4rE ~ L Arr,J / r ~ R !Q7" /~ F TiS~/s SuBM /YI~A-L TD PL-/huN/~/(~ PLl4-NTED- Fi4-A2 MDK.t= 7'7`ffF~ ~€/NG- /Q~MOV 17) Indicate any bodes of water (mdudmg domestic water supplies) into which the sde drams 18)Ind~cate expeded amount of water usage (See Attachment A for usage estimates) For further danficabon, please tooted the Cucamonga County WaterDrstnd of 987-2591 a Residential (gal/day) Peak use (gaUDay) b CommercraUlnd (gaUdey/ac) ~, ~ ~ Peak use (gaUmrNac) _~, 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal Septic Tank ~ Sewer If septic tanks ere proposed, attach percolation tests I/ discharge to a sanitary sewage system rs proposed rnd~cate expected daily sewage generation- (See Attachment A for usage estimates) For furfher clanficabon, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Drstnd at 987- 2591 a Res~denbal (gal/day) b CommercraUlnd (gaUdey/ac) ~ r 0 0 0 RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number of resrdenhal unds Detached (md~cate range of parcel saes, minimum lot site end maximum lof srze ,~ i,1li /CAI,.nLIIJ~CILIn11C/1D~IC1/`/1111JTCCUIJ ITCTI'11 \~IDfI O,IVt n ~ Attached (indicate whetherunds ara n;ntal or/orsale unds) 21)Ant~cipated range o/sale pnces and/or rents Sale Pnce(s) $ to $ Rent (per month) $ to $ 22) Spea/y number of bedrooms by unit type 23) Indicate anticipated household srse by and type 24)lnd~cate the expected number o/school children who will be resrdmg wrthrn the proled Contact the appropnate School Distncfs as shown rn Attachment B a Elementary b Junior High c Senior High COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Descnbe type of use(s) and major function(s) o/ commerdal, rndustnal or rnsMubonal uses SPED t/L,a-T/ VE BLn~s, ~oi2 sr4~/= ANn L,E/~s6 - NOT kNOfrlN iF7- Tf>`/s T/ME . 26) Total floorarea of commeroral, rndustnel, orrnsbtutional uses by type NOT KNn~,l~tl /}-7` TH-lS TIM E ~ SPEC UL~T/VE. .c s I API GNNWr:~FINCI \Ff1RMS\COUNTFRIINITCTfN \mm~ vlnn n__,, c ~ i 27) Indicate hours o/operahon N D T k til D (~ A) fFTT Tff-/, s T/M~ - 28) Number o/ Total F employees /~ OT K ilJ A~ N f}-T 7h(/S 7/ME Maximum Shdt S l°~CUL_ A-7`/LiF . Time o/Marrmum Shdt• 29)Pmwde breakdown ofanhdpated/ob classrficahons, rncludmg wage and salary ranges, as well as an rndicabon o/the rate o/ hire for each classrficahon (attach additional sheet rf ned3ssary). ~ Q T Kn) o (d ti A-T T/>` / S T/M ~ -,-.YP~C u ~ ~~r/vim . 30) Estimahon o/the number o/ workers M be hued that currently reside rn the City /.J o •'~ k~)o(.J.cl j~T 7-/f-/ c TIME-- rPFCr~c.~-Tiv~E. '31)For commercial and rndustnal uses only, rndreate fhe source, type and amount o/arr pollution emissions (Data should be venfied through the South Coast Arr Quality Management Drstnct et (818) 572-6283) /.1 D T k AI d Gl nJ i4-T T/></S ZiM G - SP~cTJLit-T/G'~ ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood conhol agendas serving the pm/act been contacted to determine their ability to provide adequate service to the proposed pm/ect~ l/so, please rndreate them response ,DUt~(n./ t;- Pa EL/ M inl A-l~ Y RrV/~[J P~oc~ss Tff~ MID?EcT /.~A-s KoUT~D TD A-LL .DE~A-KTME,c/7'~- No ryotc) - sEtcVE sTfFTSM~Ts GI,EK~ /rva/c,4r-ct~ ~ Y F/K E d R Eic1 G / ill,E.LcR / .v ~ . ,~ ,c sa n lJ I Cpl ALIAU~IR\FINCI \FrIRMC\('rll INTER\IN ITCTfI'I UIPI'1 9rM1 Gene ~ In the known history o/this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic matenals? 33JExamples of hazardous and/ortoxic matenals include, but are not limited to PCB, radioactive substances, pesticides and herbicides, fuels, oils, solvents, and other Bammable l~gwds and gases Also note underground storage of any of the above P/ease list the matenals and descnbe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, d known To ny~t sECTUR L (C,yOC.J l,6aGE T/fE'/t.~ .4 /f.~ nJeNE , 34J ill the proposed pro/act involve the temporary orlong-term use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or towc matenals, including but not limited to those examples listed above? If yes, prowde an inventory of all such matena/s'to be used and proposed method of disposal The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the appl~cabon plans //OT KND41N R-T Tff/S T/MB -S~~GdLf}Tiri~ 1 heroby ceRify that the statements lumished above and in the attached exhibds present fhe data and infomrabon required for adequate evaluabon of this pro/act to the best of my ability, that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct tot he best o/my knowledge and belief I further understand that addd~onal information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluabon can be made by the Cdy o/Rancho Cucamonga. Date ~~~b ~~ Z Signatum ~,p .~ ~y-l Title l~~i~~`(` ,f~ ~ C 53 ... .. ~. ~~. ~..~ ~~. ~.. ,inn.. r~nn~ o,mrnvu~~nrn• .an n,n,. ATTACHMENT A Water Usage Average use per day Residential Single Family Apt/Condo Commercial/InilustNal General and Regional Commercal Neighborhood Commercial Generallndustnal Industnal Park Peak Usage For all uses Average use x 2.0 Sewer Flows Residential Single Family Apt/Condos Commercial/Industrial General Commercial Neighborhood Commercial General Industnal Heavy Industnal Source Cucamonga County Water Distract Master Plan, 9/86 600 gaVday 400 gal/day 3000 gaVday/ac 1500 gaVday/ac 1500 gal/day/ac 3000 gaVday/ac 270 gaVday 200 gaVday 2000 gaVday/ac 100-1500 gaVday/ac 2000 gaVday/ac 3000 gaVday/ac ~ ,C. 5y I \PLANNING\FINAL\FORMSICOUNTER\INITSTOI WPD 3/00 Page 9 ATTACHMENT B • Contact the school distract for your area for amount and payment of school fees Elementary School Districts Alta Loma 9350 Base Line Road, Swte F Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 987-0766 Central 10601 Church Street, Swte 112 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 989-8541 Cucamonga 8776 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 987-8942 Etlwanda 5959 East Avenue • P O Box 248 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 (909)899-2451 High School Chaffey High School 211 West 5th Street Ontano, CA 91762 (909)988-6511 I \PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\INITSTDI WPD 3/00 Page 10 LEGAL OWNERSHIPS AND ADDRESSES (CURRENT) WEST -BLDG. 1 Legal Owner: Richard K Wagner and Constance Wagner Davtdson, Co-Trustees of the Richard H Wagner Trust, dated March 18, 1980 Constance Wagner Davidson, Trustee of the Moxham Sibling Trust, dated December 12, 1988 Address: C/o Wagner Development Group P O Box 126 Corona del Mar, CA 92625 Phone (949)477-4977 Fax (949)477-4947 WEST - BLDGS. 2.3 and 4 Legal Owner: Richard K Wagner and Constance Wagner Davidson, Co-Trustees of the Brevazd Trust Richard K Wagner and Constance Wagner Davrdson, Co-Trustees of the Richard H Wagner Marital Trust, dated March 18, 1980 Richard K Wagner and Constance Wagner Davidson, Co-Trustees of the Richard H Wagner Trust, dated March 18, 1980 Constance Wagner Davidson, Trustee of the Moxham Sibling Trust, dated December 12, 1988 Address: C/o Wagner Development Group P O Box 126 Corona del Mar, CA 92625 Phone (949)477-4977 Fax (949)477-4947 • C C ~,C Slo i • City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND Project File: DRC 2002-00751 and SUBTMP 16009 2. Related Files: DRC 2002-00750, SUBTMP 16010, and DRC 2002-00241 3. Description of Project: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16009 - RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION -The subdivision of 4 86 acres of land into four parcels in the General Industrial District (Subarea 13), located at the southeast corner and southwest corner of 6th Street and Charles Smith Avenue -APN: 229-263-05, 229-283-04 and 05 RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION -The development of four industrial buildings totaling 54,662 square feet on 4.86 acres of land in the general Industrial Distract (Subarea 13), located at the southeast corner and southwest corner of 6th Street and Charles Smith Avenue -APN• 229-263-05, 229-283-04 and 05. 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: KRW Development Corporation 13622 Rushmore Lane Santa Ana, California 92705 5. General Plan Designation: Industrial 6. Zoning: General Industrial (Subarea 13) 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The western and southeastern lots on the protect site were previously used for agricultural purposes with remnants of grape vines remaining onsite According to the Historical Structure study (McKenna, July 2002), the lot located directly southeast of the Charles Smith Avenue/ Sixth Street intersection is occupied with a house near the northern portion. An unoccupied house is located on the lot west of Charles Smith Avenue Both these houses were planned for demolition in October 2002 according to the Part 1 -Environmental Information Form completed for the protect. The properties surrounding the protect site are zoned and developed with similar uses to the proposed protect as warehouse and light manufacturing Industrial developments generally surround the protect site in all directions, with several existing vacant lots in the surrounding area Interstate 15 is located directly east of the protect site passing in anorth/south direction. The lots located directly north of the protect site are currently vacant and appear to be used for agricultural purposes Large manufacturing developments are located southwest of the site. Offices currently exist • directly south of the site lust east of Charles Smith Avenue The proposed protect should not create any conflicts with the existing land uses in the surrounding area and should remain consistent with the General Plan's land use designation for the surrounding area. 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: ~ `C CJfL • ~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2002-00751 Page 2 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Ciwc Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Warren Morelion, Assistant Planner (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required. None • f"C ~ C ~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2002-00751 Page 3 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by flies protect, involving at least one impact that Is "Potentlally Significant Impact," "Potentlally Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. OLand Use and Planrnng (/) Transportabon/Circulahon (/) Biological Resources ( ) / Public Services (/) population and Housing ()Energy and Mineral Resources (/) Utilities and Service Systems (/) Geological Problems ()Hazards (/) Aesthetics (/) Water ) Noise ( ()Cultural Resources (/) Air Quality ~ Mandato Findin s of S~ nificance (/) Recreation DETERMINATION On the bases of this Initial evaluation• (/) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project, or agreed to, by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. Signed Warren Morellon, Assistant Planner November 19, 2002 CJ T'1tC S 1 Initial Study for DRC2002-00751 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act Gwdelenes, an explanation es required for all "Potentially Segmficant Impact," "Potentially Segmfecant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated,° and "Less Than Segmficant Impact" answers, encluding a discussion of ways to mitigate the segmficant effects identrfeed Polanaally Slgnifiwnt Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potanl4111y u ~s r~l~~ Significant MitpaUOn Signilmant No Im p Inm eletl I act Im d LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal. a) Conflict with general plan designation or zomng~ () () () (~) b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or () () () (~) policies adopted by agencies with luresdecteon over the prolect c) Be incompateble with existing land use en the () () () (~) wcirnty~ d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an () () () (~) established communety~ Comments• a-d) The prolect site consists of a total of 4 86 acres located lust southeast and southwest df the Charles Smith Avenue and 6th Street intersection The proposed prolect involves the development of four industreal park bueldengs, which would be used for warehouse and light manufacturing with related office uses. The area surrounding the prolect site es developed with similar land uses in all directions and the prolect would be consistent with the General Plan's land use designation for the site Several vacant lots are currently located north of the prolect site also zoned for industrial land uses and likely to be developed in the near future. The prolect would generate increased emissions en the area during construction and prolect operations Section 5 -Air Quality discusses the emissions generated by the prolect, analyses of impacts, and proposed mitigation measures The prolect would also increase the noise levels onsete since the site es currently vacant Secteon 10 - Noese descusses the noese impacts antecepated weth development of the proposed prolect Polenllally SigniUCant Issues and Supporting Information Sources Polam~ellr a °e s Tna~ S~gn~ficani Miligaaon S~ihcanl No 1 eh IMO etad I eC I eh City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 2. POPULA71ON AND HOUSO~Kx Would the proposal a) Cumulatively exceed offeceal regional or local population prolecteons~ ~~~lO~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2002-00751 Page 5 Polenlally Significant Impact Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Prnentally unless roan Significant Mitigaaw Significant No I q Inw ralatl I C I an b) Induce substantial growth in an area either () () (~) ( ) directly or indirectly (e g ,through protects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure) c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable () () (~) ( ) housing Comments• a-b) The proposed protect involves the development of four industrial park buildings (totaling 54,662 sq ft) on a total of 4.86 acres located lust southeast and southwest of the Charles Smith Avenue and 6th Street intersection. The development would be used for warehouse and light manufacturing purposes with related office space The protect would result in additional employees working within the City The exact number of employees the developments may generate to the area is currently unknown, but the impacts should not be significant since the protect is located in a housing rich area, and the protect would likely improve the lob to housing ratio in the City c) Two lots on the site are currently vacant and were used for agricultural purposes with one older residence located onsite. An occupied residence is located on the third lot and was planned for removal during October 2002 Remnants of grape vines still exist in portions of the site The site is currently surrounded by industrial development, and zoned for General Industrial land uses The protect would not create any significant impacts to existing housing in the area Potantully Significant Impaq Lass Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potantellr unleaa Tnan Significant Mitgaaw Spnifiranl No 1 d Inw etetl I cl I ad 3. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result ~n or expose people to potential tmpacts mvolwng: a) Fault ruptures () () () (~) b) Seismic ground shakings () () (~) ( ) c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefactions O O O (~) d) Seiche hazards O O O (~) e) Landslides or mudflows~ () () () (~) f) Erosion, changes in topography, or unstable soil () () () (~) conditions from excavation, grading, or fill g) Subsidence of the lands O O O (~) >~ ~ n ~` Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2002-00751 Page 6 Potentially Significant Impart Le53 Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentally unless Tnan Significant MM1igatwn SitFafirant No 1 n Into IeE I n Im C h) Expansive soils () () () (~) i) Unique geologic or physical features () () () (~) Comments• a-b) No known faults pass through the site, it is not in an Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone, nor is it in the City of Rancho Cucamonga Special Study Zone along the Red Hdl Fault (see Figure V-1 in the 2001 City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan). The Red Hdl Fault, or Etiwanda Avenue Fault, passes approximately 2 8 miles northwest of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 4 7 miles north of the site Both these faults are capable of producing a moment magnitude (My,) 6.0 - 7 0 earthquake. The San Jacinto Fault Zone, capable of producing up to My, 6 9 earthquakes, passes within 9.8 miles northeast of the site The San Andreas fault, capable of up to Mw 8.2 earthquakes, passes within 12.8 miles to the north/northeast These faults discussed are capable of producing intense ground shaking on the subtect site Adhering to the Unrform Building Code would ensure that geologic impacts are less than significant. c) Liquefaction occurs when loose saturated cohesion-less soils are subtect to ground shaking during an earthquake of large magnitude. Additionally, liquefaction may occur when the water table is less than 40 feet below ground surface. Based on ground water depths within the area (approximately 300-350 feet below surface grade), the potential for liquefaction within the protect area is unlikely The protect site is not located in an area susceptible to ground failure from liquefaction according to the City's General Plan EIR Adhering to the City grading standards, and the Uniform Building Code, would ensure that geologic impacts are less than signrficant. d) The site is not located near a body of water According to Figure V-5 of the City's General Plan, the protect site is not located in close proximity to any areas susceptible to 100-year floodwater inundation The nearest 100-year flood hazard area is located east of the site along Etiwanda Avenue. Development of the proposed protect would not create any impacts with regards to seiche hazards e) All three lots comprising the protect site are similar topographically with relatively flat sloping slightly towards the southwest. The area surrounding the site is also relatively flat and mainly developed in all directions with similar land uses to those proposed in the protect. Landslides and mudflows should not create any impacts with regards to the proposed development f) The topography would be altered to accommodate the protect since most of the protect site is currently vacant and contains remnants of grape vines onsite. Two houses are located on the site and planned for removal in the future, one of which currently remains occupied according to the historical study {McKenna, July 2002) completed for the protect Grading would be done in accordance with a grading plan approved by the City Engineer • Atc ~a ~J Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2002-00751 Page 7 g-h) Two sod types are present on site according to the Sod Survey of San Bernardino County Southwestern Part, California (USDA, Soil Conservation Service, 1980) Soboba Series soils consist of excessively drained, nearly level to moderately sloping sods that formed on alluvial fans in granitic alluvium Tutunga Senes sods consist of somewhat excessively drained, nearly level to moderately sloping sods that also formed on alluvial fans in granitic alluvium The two soil types are described below 1 Soboba soils are characterized as very rapidly permeable, with available water capacity of 2 to 3 inches These sods are mainly used for irrigated estrus and dry-farmed seeded pasture. Runoff is slow and the hazard of erosion is slight. 2 Tufunga loamy sand is characterized as having slow to very slow runoff These soils are also traditionally used for crop irrigation, including grapes, small grams, and pasture plants. The water erosion hazard is slight, with available water capacity of 4 to 5 inches The soil has moderate to high wind erosion potential if left unprotected Both these sod types are suitable for development. i) The site contains no unique geologic or physical features. Pomnbelly Signrficnm Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potenliellr u ° s« may Spnificenl Mibgabon S~guficenl No Im d Into teE Im n Im d 4. WATER. Will the proposal result rn: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, () () (~) ( ) or the rate and amount of surface water runoff b) Exposure of people or property to water related () () () (~) hazards such as flooding c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration () () (~) ( ) of surface water quality (e g., temperature, dissolved oxygen, or turbidity) d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any () () (~) ( ) water body e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction () () (~) ( ) of water movements f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either () () () (~) through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations, or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater () () () (~) h) Impacts to groundwater quality Atc l~3 • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2002-00751 Page 8 Potentwlly Sgn~ficant Impact less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Putenliany UnIe55 rn„n S~gnihcam Mitil~0on Signdwant No Im ct Ingo eted I h I q Substantial reduction in the amount of () () () (~) groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies Comments• a/c-e) The protect would cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff due to the amount of new hardscape and the building proposed on the currently vacant site. The matority of the protect site is currently vacant with two houses, one of which remains occupied, and agricultural land uses onsite. Remnants of grape vines exist throughout the site. The proposed protect involved the development of four buildings, which will be used for warehouse and light manufacturing purposes with associated office spaces. The protect includes development of a drainage system to handle the excess storm water flow onsite resulting from the protect. Drainage channels would be constructed throughout the parking areas of the site at all four buildings, and will include catch basins and drain towards Charles Smith Avenue passing between the protect site. The protect also involves development of a 3 ft drain which would be constructed under the sidewalks along both the east and west sides of Charles Smith Avenue The drains will connect to the streets drainage system A final grading plan must be prepared in accordance with City standards to show how storm water runoff would be handled both during construction and post- construction. Approval of grading plans and conditions applied to the protect by the City Engineer to ensure adequate site drainage would make this impact less than significant. b) Based on Figure V-5 of the City's General Plan, the protect site is outside of the 100-year flood plain The nearest 100-year flood hazard area exists along the Etiwanda Creek Channel, which runs in a north/south direction approximately 1 3 miles east of the protect site A curb currently exists along the west side of Charles Smith Avenue south of the proposed driveway on the west lot The proposed protect would designate 6 ft of area along the eastern portion of the site, which includes development of a sidewalk and curb/gutter system In addition, a flood control utility corridor exists along the Day Creek Channel, passing lust east of Interstate 15. The protect includes development of an on-site storm drainage system to handle excess water onsite The proposed protect should not create any flooding hazard impacts with construction of the proposed drainage improvements. f-i) The protect will not interfere with groundwater management practices in the area as the site is not used for groundwater recharge. C~ ~ 1 LJ A,c ~y • • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2002-00751 Page 9 Potemlelly Sigmhcanl Impen Lew Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potenl~311y unless then Sgnifiranl Mingaoon SigniM1Cant No 1 n IMO eteE 1 n I n 5. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to () (~) () ( ) an existing or protected air quality violation? b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants () () (~) ( ) c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or () () () (~) cause any change in climate d) Create obtectionable odors () () () (~) Comments: a) The proposed development of four industrial park buildings, which will be used for warehouse and light manufacturing purposes with associated office spaces. Two houses are currently located onsite, and were planned for removal in October 2002 The demolition of these houses was incorporated into the air quality analysis The criteria pollutants screened for included reactive organic gases (ROG), nitrous oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), and particulates (PM,o). Air quality impacts caused during protect development are discussed in the Construction Emissions section, and long-term operational impacts are discussed in the Operations Emissions section Construction Emissions During grading, fugitive dust (PM,o) would be generated Since there are existing industrial developments surrounding the protect site, and since the South Coast Air Basin is in non-attainment status for ozone and suspended particulates (PM,o), fugitive dust generated during construction would be mitigated by the following measures 1. The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by the South Coast Air Quality Management District and Regional Water Duality Control Board) daily to reduce PM,g emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 2. 6th Street and Charles Smith Avenue shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~g emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. • 3. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4. Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by the South Coast Air Quality Management District and Reggional W/at_er t]uality Control Board) shall be /-~ t ` 1 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2002-00751 Page 10 applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. Dunng construction, exhaust emissions from construction vehicles and equipment, and fugitive dust generated by equpment traveling over exposed surfaces, would increase NO, and PM,o levels in the area The following mitigation measures would ensure impacts to existing development are at less than significant levels. 5. The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-site based on low emission factors and high-energy efficiency. The construction contractor shall ensure the construction grading plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. 6. The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 7. The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. The proposed protect was screened using the Urban Emission Model 2001 (URBEMIS2001) prepared by Jones & Stokes under the gwdance of the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control Distract, the Ventura County Air Pollution Control Distract, and the South Coast Air Quality Management Distract (SCAQMD). The program generates emissions estimates for land use development protects. Though not regwred, construction emissions are screened and quantified to document the effectiveness of control measures Table 1 shows construction emission results before and after the mitigation measures have been implemented Table 1 URBEMIS2001 Construction Emissions Summary (Pounds oer Dav) Source ROG NO, CO PM,o Unmet. .Met Unmet Met Unmet. Met Unmet Met Demolition - - - - - - 0.66 0 66 Gradm 0 40 0.38 6 31 6 00 - - 49.17 32.61 Worker Tn s 0 18 0.18 0.26 0 26 0 50 0 50 0 05 0 05 Stationa E w 0.34 0 34 0 27 0.27 - - 0.02 0.02 Mobile E ui 1 13 1 07 14 99 14 24 - - 1.08 1.03 Arch Coatin s 60.17 6017 - - - - - - As halt 1.27 1 27 - - - - - - Totals 63 49 63 41 21.84 20 77 0.50 0.50 50.97 34.36 SCAQMD Thres 75 75 100 100 550 550 150 150 Si nificance No No No No No No No No Based on the URBEMIS2001 model results for the proposed development, construction emissions will not exceed the established SCAQMD threshold levels u C .~ A ~C ~a~o i • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2002-00751 Page 11 for the pollutants screened in Table 1 above The proposed protect will not have a significant impact to emission levels during construction Operational Emissions The operational mobile source emissions were calculated using the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual 6`h edition values programmed into the URBEMIS2001 model In order to reflect the industrial nature of the proposed protect, the default fleet mix was modified to reflect the proposed development Emissions associated with these vehicle trips are listed in Table 2 These values are based on the existing and proposed sidewalks in the area Table 2 Operations Emissions (Pounds aer Dav) Source ROG NOx CO PM~o Unmet. Met Unmet. Met Unmet. Mit. Unmet Met Area Source 0 06 0 00 0.81 0 00 0 32 0 00 0 00 0 00 Mobile Source 6 48 6 38 17 02 16.75 81 83 80.55 2 74 2 69 Totals 6.54 6.38 17 83 16 75 82.15 80 55 2 74 2 69 SCAOMD Thres 55 55 55 55 550 550 150 150 Si nificance No No No No No No No No b) The area surrounding the protect site is generally developed with similar uses as the proposed protect, and zoned as General Industrial Industrial developments are located in the surrounding area in all directions The vacant lots surrounding the protect site are likely to be developed for similar industrial purposes in the future Interstate 15 is located in close proximity east of the protect site According to the URBEMIS2001 results for the protect, the proposed protect would create an impact to air quality during the operational phase of the protect, but this impact would remain below the established threshold levels for the screened pollutants. c-d) The proposed protect involves the development of four industrial park bwldings which would be used for warehousing and light manufacturing purposes with associated office spaces. The protect should not create any impacts to air movements in the area or create any obtectionable odors. Surrounding land uses are developed and zoned for similar uses to that of the proposed protect Polannelly $gniM1Cani Impel Leas Issues and Supporting Information Sources Polennellr unless men $ignificem Mibgeuon Significant No Im t1 Into ateC I C Im etl 6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result m a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion U O (~) ( ) tC ~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2002-00751 Page 12 Polenlially Significant Impact Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources PotanUally unless rnan SBmficant Mitigation Sgnificanl No Im d Into retetl I an 1 n b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g , () () () (~) sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment) c) Inadequate emergency access or access to () () () (~) nearby uses d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-sites () () () (~) e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists () () () (~) f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting () () () (~) alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks) g) Rail or air traffic impacts O O O (~) Comments: a) The proposed protect consists of developing four industrial park buildings, which would be used for warehousing and light manufacturing purposes with associated office spaces Based on the URBEMIS2001 results for the proposed protect, the protect would generate approximately 299 trips per day, which should not create a significant increase to traffic and congestion in the area The protect site is located lust southwest and southeast of the 6th Street and Charles Smith Avenue intersection. Interstate 15 is located directly east of the protect site, and the nearest access point to the freeway is located along 4th Street south of the site. b-d) Access to the site would be provided from Charles Smith Avenue, which passes between the two separate protect areas The proposed protect includes a total of three access points two along the east side of Charles Smith Avenue which would provide access to the proposed Buildings 2, 3, and 4. One driveway is proposed for development on the west side of the protect site, which would provide access to the proposed Building 1 The nearest driveway to the 6th Street intersection would be the driveway located furthest to the north on the east side, which would be approximately 300 feet south of the 6th Street centerline No safety hazards resulting from dangerous intersections or design features are anticipated with the proposed protect No hazard resulting from incompatible uses would occur as the surrounding area is zoned and mainly developed with similar land uses The protect design plans indicate that the protect would require a total of 112 parking spaces, and the protect is proposing to provide a total of 122 parking spaces, which is sufficient for the size and type of the development U t C ~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2002-00751 Page 13 e-f) The proposed project is the development of four industrial park buildings lust southwest and southeast of the 6th Street and Charles Smith Avenue intersection. The site is currently zoned for industrial land uses, as is the surrounding area. According to Figure III-13 of the City's General Plan, no regional or multi-purpose trails pass adjacent to the protect site The nearest multi-purpose trail is located along the Day Creek Channel east of the protect site The proposed project should not create any impacts to pedestrians or bicyclists that exist in the area g) The project site is located approximately 2 4 miles northeast of Ontario Airport, offset north of the flight path and would not be adversely affected by airport actmties. ~1 paent~lly SigndKpn! Impact Lasa Issues and Supporting Information Sources paent~eilr unle:: then Sgnifirant Mitigation Signd¢enl No Im ea Inro retetl Im ct Im a 7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result ~n rmpacts to a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their () () () (~) habitats (including, but not limited to• plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds) b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage trees, O (~) O ( ) eucalyptus windrow, etc )~ c) Locally designated natural communities (e g., () () () (~) eucalyptus grove, sage scrub habitat, etc.)? d) Wetland habitat (e g., marsh, riparian, and () () () (~) vernal pool) e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corndors~ O O O (~) Comments: a) The site is within the Ontario Habitat Recovery Unit for the Delhi Sands Flower- Loving Fly (DSF) as identified within the US Fish & Wildlife Service Final Recovery Plan for the DSF dated September 14, 1997. In August 2001, Ecological Sciences performed a Focused Delhi Sands Flower-loving Fly Habitat Survey for the site No DSF were observed during the focused surveys Additionally, no other sign of recent DSF occupancy was detected (e.g pupal skins) Abundance and diversity of sand inhabiting insects was much lower than would be expected on undisturbed Delhi sands formations Further, plant speaes indicative of potential DSF habitat were not detected. Groan the lack of important DSF indicator speaes, the low overall diversity and abundance of other sand inhabiting species typical of undisturbed Delhi sand ecological communities, and the absence of DSF during the 2001 DSF flight season, the subtect property does not currently support a DSF population The site is not located adjacent to an area known to support DSF The nearest recent occurrence of DSF is located several miles south of the site. Further, based on information from off-site field visits, consultation with other entomologists, and results of other DSF surveys conducted in the general area, the P~ ~ C~ lob • ! Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2002-00751 Page 14 2001 DSF flight season was apparently "productroe" relative to the above ground activity period for DSF b) According to an arbonst report prepared for the protect, there are a total of 66 trees on site that meet the minimum criteria for designation as heritage trees Of these 66 trees, 46 are Ailanthus altissima. The specimens of Ailanthus are typical specimens without distinct character or form This tree variety is considered to be a weed tree based on its tendency to sucker and to self-seed. Most of the Ailanthus have self-sprouted. There is one mature Eucalyptus tree onsite. This tree has a structural deformity making it prone to failure There are five younger speaes of eucalyptus onsite These specmens are diminutive and poorly formed, and are infested with Lerp Psyllud, a regional insect condition that affects certain subspecies of eucalyptus Several California peppers and china berry specimens onsite are extremely mature and suffering from declining form and structure The miscellaneous silk tree, mulberry, jacaranda, and oleander are not outstanding or mdroidually developed and distinctroe specimens as they are suffering from structural decline and have minimal long term potential for survival One canyon oak occurs onsite and is considered an unusual species for the area. The specimen is a typical middle maturity specimen without any obvious disease or decline symptoms. The report indicated that proposed grading would grossly impact existing trees m their present locations However, based upon the trees existing conditions only the canyon oak meats consideration for preservation or relocation on site The City has regwred the applicant to preserve the oak in its present location if possible The following mitigation measures will ensure impacts to the canyon oak are at a less than significant level 7. In order to preserve the tree in its existing location the grade level will need to be preserved for a distance of 25 feet out from the trunk in all directions. This area is the root preservation zone and no development or construction operations may occur therein. 8. Prior to grading, a fence shall be constructed to minimize potential damage to the root zone. 9. The final landscape plan shall show that no landscape or other encroachment shall occur within the root zone. The surface of the root preservation area shall be treated with decomposed granite, organic compost or cobblestones in order to create an aesthetically appealing texture. Relocation of the canyon oak onsite may occur only if the applicant can allow for a four to six month relocation process If this amount of time is infeasible then relocation of the oak is not permitted - c) Agricultural land uses with remnant of grape vines exist in many portion of the project site Previous developm ent on the site has eliminated any natural n /'t t ~ ~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2002-00751 Page 15 communities that may have previously existed on the site The project would not create any impacts to locally designated natural communities in the area d) There is no riparian or wetland habitat on-site e) The surrounding development has eliminated any wildlife corridors that may have occurred in the past. The site is currently located in an industrial zoned area and is surrounded by industrial development in all directions In addition, three streets exist directly adjacent to the property, further eliminating the potential for any wildlife corridors from existing onsite. There is little potential the site would provide a migration corridor in the future with the existing developments in the area The proposed project should not create any impacts to migration corridors that may exist in the area Potentially Significant Issues and Supporting Information Sources Polanaallr u~ss inen Significant MnigaOOn S~gmficanl No I ad Inm etetl 1 ci Im ad 8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation () ( ) () (~) plans b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and () () () (~) inefficient manner c) Result in the loss of availability of a known () () () (~) mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State Comments: a-b) The project will be required to conform with applicable City standards for energy conservation c) The project site is located in an area classified as a Mineral Resource Zone (MRZ-2). An MRZ-2 zone contains deposits of known value and marketability However, the State Geologist has determined that the area is not a Designated Area of available resources due to urbanization. Additionally, the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan does not identify the area as occurring in an aggregate extraction resource area (Exhibit IV-1, General Plan). Potentwaly $~gnificanl ~ Issues and Supporting Information Sources Pmant~auy u ia ~ i a~ Sigmhcant Mrtalaoon 9gmhcant No 1 act Into alBd I act Im C 9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal Involve ~ ~ ~, Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2002-00751 Page 16 • PWennally Sigmficanl Impact Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Polanl~ellr unlaaa roan S~prnficanl MNgaaon Spnd¢ant No I q Inco tact Im p I ct a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of () () () (~) hazardous substances (including, but not limited to• oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation) b) Possible interference with an emergency () () () (~) response plan or emergency evacuation plan c) The creation of any health hazard or potential () () () (~) health hazard d) Exposure of people to existing sources of () () () (~) potential health hazards e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable () () (~) ( ) brush, grass, or trees Comments: a/c/d) The protect site is currently mainly vacant and was used for agricultural purposes in the past There are currently two houses located on the site, one of which is still occupied according to the historical study completed for the protect. Both these houses were planned for demolition and removal in October 2002 Asbestos containing building materials could occur in these houses Prior to demolition of the existing structures, the developer must determine whether the buildings contain asbestos The following mitigation measures shall be implemented prior to demolition of the existing structures: 9. Prior to issuance of demolition permits, the applicant shall have an asbestos survey completed for the structures. A report of findings shall be presented to the Building Official with the application for a demolition permit. Should the survey show asbestos is present, the applicant shall follow the recommendations made in the report for proper treatment and/or removal during demolition. The area surrounding the protect site is also zoned industrial with similar developments in the surrounding area. Any risks involving hazardous substances, or creation and exposure to health hazards would not impact the protect since future tenants are required to abide by applicable City, State, and federal laws mandating industry operations and storage standards b) The proposed development should not interfere with any existing emergency response or evacuation plan The protect provides a total of three access points to the four proposed buildings, two along the east side of Charles Smith Avenue, and one on the west side. Adequate access would be provided for emergency vehicles • with a minimal driveway width of 28 feet The protect provides adequate ingress/egress points throughout the site ~ ,c~ ~-a Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2002-00751 Page 17 e) The proposed development involves removing existing onsite vegetation Remnants of previous grapevines, in addition to a total of 66 trees, currently exist on the site The proposed protect involves the removal of most of these trees, and upon completion would include a greater number of total trees than currently exist on the site with implementation of the proposed landscaping plan. The landscaping vegetation must be maintained in accordance with City standards and would not create any significant impacts to increased flammable vegetation on the site Potentially Sgn~ficant Issues and Supporting Information Sources Pptanlially uneu rna~ Significant Mitlgaaon Sigmfirant No Im ct Inco taE 1 acl Im q 10. NOISE. Wdl the proposal result m: a) Increases in existing noise levels () () (~) ( ) b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels () () () (~) Comments• a) The prolect would add people and traffic to the area and generally increase ambient noise levels During the construction phase of the protect, the increased noise generated onsite would only occur over a limited period of time, and should not create any significant impacts since no sensitive receptors are located in the surrounding area. During operations, the prolect would remain consistent with the land use designation for the area. The prolect would not create any significant impacts to existing noise levels in the area b) The protect involves the development of four industrial park buildings to be used for warehousing and light manufacturing purposes with associated office spaces. The development will remain consistent with surrounding land uses, zoned as Industrial and should not expose people to severe noise levels r_~ PolanLally Significant Impap Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Pwantalir unlasa Tnan Significant Miagefion Signifiwnt No Impact Incprparetetl Impact Impact 11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an ef/ect upon or result m a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas a) Fire protections O O (~) ( ) b) Police protections () () (~) ( ) c) Schools () () (~) ( ) d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads () () (~) ( ) e) Other governmental services () () () (r) ,~ I J Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2002-00751 Page 18 L J Comments: a-e) Fire Protection -The protect site is located lust southeast and southwest of the Charles Smith Avenue and 6th Street intersection, in an industnal zoned area According to the General Plan, Exhibit V-7, the site is located in a low probability fire nsk area, and is served by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distnct The closest fire station in proximity to the protect site is located near the intersection of Milliken Avenue and Jersey Boulevard (Station No 174), located within 3/a-mile northwest of the subtect property The District is responsible for evaluating the protect through the City's Development Review and Growth Management process. The proposed protect includes structural fire protection standards contained in the Uniform Fire Code. Therefore, no mitigation is regwred Police Protection -Police Protection for the area is provided under a contract with the County Shenff's Department. The proposed industrial development will include standard security devices such as street lighting, and locks on all doors and windows. Additional police protection should not be regwred, as the addition of four industrial buildings on a 4.86-acre site should not create any significant security issues Schools -The protect site is located within the turisdiction of the Cucamonga School District The Protect could generate some additional employees living in the area, so there is potential for increased student enrollment in the local schools. However, due to the City's housing nch situation, the industrial development should not cause a significant increase to the local workforce because most employees would likely come from the surrounding area, and therefore result in only a minimal impact to the school distract Parks -The proposed industral development should not generate a substantial increase to the number of new employees in the area, and therefore is unlikely to create a significant demand for additional park faalities in the area. The protect site is located in an industrial zoned area, and according to the City's General Plan, no park facilities exist within aone-mile radius of the site Impact fees are collected at the time of building permit issuance. The new industrial development will therefore not cause a significant impact to existing parks Public Facilities -The proposed development should not cause any significant impact to public facilities located within the wcinity The nearest public facilities to the protect site include a California Highway Patrol Station to the southwest, the fire station to the northwest, an animal shelter to the north, and the West Valley Detention Center to the southeast (Exhibit III-9, General Plan) The protect should not cause a significant impact to these facilities u t ~ T~ Initial Study for DRC2002-00751 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 19 Potentwlly Sgmfitent Impact Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potant~allr unla:: roan Sgmfifant Mngeuon Significant No I C Inm ted Im p I act 12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result m a need for new systems or supplies or substantial alterations to the following util~t~es a) Power or natural gasp () () () (~) b) Commurncation systems? O O O (~) c) Local or regional water treatment or distnbution () () () (~) facihties~ d) Sewer or septic tanks () () () (~) e) Storm water drainages () () (~) ( ) f) Solid waste disposals () () () (~) g) Local or regional water supplies () () () (~) Comments: • a-g) The proposed prolect involves development of four industnal buildings which will be used for warehousing and light manufacturing purposes with associated office spaces Two houses currently exist on the site, and were planned for removal in October 2002 Both these residences have access to the utility systems in the area. Although the local agenaes providing utility service to the site have not yet been contacted, they should be capable of providing adequate service to the site, as similar industrial developments exist in the surroundings area The current City contracted hauler would most likely provide solid waste disposal Waste would likely be disposed of at the County of San Bernardino Mid-Valley Sanitary Landfill The prolect would increase demand upon storm drain systems due to the increased runoff from new hardscape and buildings proposed on the site. The City and Cucamonga County Water Distract currently handle wastewater conveyance systems within the City, while treatment is handled by Inland Empire Utilities Agency These systems should be adequate to handle the increased services needed for the proposed prolect Potemlelly Significant Issues and Supporting Information Sources Prnam~aur ~ ~~ roan Signihcanl Mlhgahon Significant No 1 h Inca letl I C Im ect 13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal • a) Affect a scenic vista or scemc highways () () () (~) b) Have a demonstrable negatwe aesthetic effects () () () (~) c) Create light or glares n rt () () (~) ( ) n t~ TS Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2002-00751 Page 20 Comments• a-b) The protect site is not within a scenic vista or scenic highway view corridor according to Figure III-17 of the City's General Plan. The protect site, and the surrounding area is zoned for industrial land uses. A City view corridor exists along 6th Street east of Milliken Avenue, looking m a northern direction. Charles Smith Avenue, which runs m the north/south direction lust east of the protect site, is identified as a Speaal Boulevard according to Figure III-17 The proposed industrial development is consistent with the surrounding land uses and creates no unusual aesthetic impacts m the area c) The protect would likely create the amount of light onsite since only two houses currently exist on the property The site is currently zoned for industrial uses and is surrounded by similar developments m all directions. No sensitwe receptors are located m proximity to the protect site since the existing houses would be demolished before construction of the proposed protect begins The new light and glare caused by the proposed protect would not create significant impacts to the area since there are no sensitive receptors present m close proximity of the site. Paentally Sgnlficani Impep Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potenluuy unless Than Slgnlfir2nl MM1geeon Sgnihcant No I a Into tee I a I a 14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal. a) Disturb Paleontological resources () () () (~) b) Disturb archaeological resources O O O (~) c) Affect historical or cultural resources () () () (~) d) Have the potential to cause a physical change, () () () (~) which would affect unique ethnic cultural values e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within () () () (~) the potential impact area Comments• a-e) The site has not been identified m the City's Master Environmental Assessment as containing historic or cultural resources Additionally, the site is located m an area that is essentially surrounded by development and to date, no resources have been uncovered m the vicinity of the subtect site. A historical study was completed for the proposed protect entitled• An Evaluation of Two Historical Structures at the Intersection of Charles Smith and G" Street, Rancho Cucamonga, completed by McKenna et AI, m July 2002. The study found no evidence of historical resources onsite and concluded that the proposed protect would not result in any adverse impacts to cultural resources. In addition, no historical landmarks are located within the immediate vianity of the protect site according to Figure III-17 of the City's General Plan The two houses onsite are not considered to be historic No impacts to cultural resources are anticipated with development of the proposed protect ~~ • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2002-00751 Page 21 Potanaelly Significant ImpeU Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentally unless Thin SigniGCanl A4ligalron SigniLranf No Im U Inm ateA I U I U 15. RECREATION. Would the proposal a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities? b) Affect existing recreational opportunities Comments: a) The protect may increase the demand for park and recreational facilities as it would increase the number of employees in the City The developer of the protect would be required to pay park development fees as a condition of approval The impact is not considered significant. b) The proposed protect is located in an General Industrial zoned district and should not cause any impact to the existing recreational opportunities in the area The area surrounding the protect site is currently developed with similar land uses to the proposed protect. • C~ Polentaly S~gn~ficant ImpaU Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Palem~allr unless roan Sipmficent M1Lngafion Signdwent No Im aU Inco etatl Im U Im U 16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Potential to degrade: Does the protect have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the mator periods of California history or prehistory b) Short term: Does the protect have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively beef, defirntive period of time Long-term impacts will endure well into the future ) (~) (°) to 7 T Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2002-00751 Page 22 Potenp"Ily Sigmhcant ~ Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potenliely ies; un Tna~ Sgnificanl Miogatwn Spmhcent No Im en Into eletl I <I I C c) Cumulative: Does the protect have impacts that () () (~) ( ) are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a protect are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past protects, the effects of other current protects, and the effects of probable future protects.) d) Substantial adverse: Does the protect have () () (~) ( ) environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly Comments: a) The matority of the protect site is currently vacant with remnants of grape vines located in many portions of the site Two residential units currently exist on the site that are characterized as deplorable in condition, and were planned for removal in October 2002. According to an arborist report prepared for the site, there are a total of 66 trees on site that meet the minimum criteria for designation as heritage trees. The protect will preserve one canyon oak species onsite. No significant habitats or biological communities exist onsite that would be substantially impacted be the proposed development. The Delhi Sands Flower-Loving Fly survey indicated that the site does not currently support a DSF population The area surrounding the protect site is mainly developed with similar land uses to the protect. In addition, streets currently exist directly adtacent to the protect site in all directions The site is unlikely to provide any significant wildlife habitats or corridors in the future due to the surrounding development. The proposed protect will not create any signrficant impacts to the quality of the environment or substantially reduce existing wildlife species in the area b) The Initial Study identifies short-term impacts to air quality with development of the protect Although the proposed protect does not exceed the established SCAOMD threshold levels for any of the pollutants screened during construction, minimal short-term impacts would occur during the development phase of the protect Since the South Coast Air Basin is in non-attainment status for ozone and suspended particulates (PM~o), implementation of the air quality mitigation measures presented in this Initial Study will reduce short-term impacts to less than significant levels As indicated in Table 2 of the URBEMIS2001 model in Section 6, the protect causes no potentially significant long-term air quality impacts to the area C~ c) The proposed protect is consistent with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan that was recently adopted along with the certification of a Program EIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Consideration for significant adverse environmental effects of build out in the City and sphere of influence. The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant A,c ~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2002-00751 Page 23 • adverse effects to air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and visual resources. Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources, however they would not reduce impacts to less than sigrnficant levels. As such, the City adopted statements of overriding consideration balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan update against the signrficant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h). These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use protects that wdl be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space. With these findings and statements of overriding consideration, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is regwred. d) The proposed industrial development would not cause substantial adverse effects on humans, either directly or indirectly CJ n t ~ ~- Irntial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2002-00751 Page 24 • EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tienng, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D) The effects identified above for this protect were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Irntial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Diwsion offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply)• (~) Master Environmental Assessment and General Plan EIR -City of Rancho Cucamonga (Certified October 17, 2001) (~) General Plan -City of Rancho Cucamonga (Certified October 17, 2001) (~) An Evaluation of Two Historical Structures at the Intersection of Charles Smith (Rochester Ave) and 6"' Street, Rancho Cucamonga, McKenna et al., July 25, 2002 (~) Arbonst Report. C/O Charles Smith and Sixth Street, Jim Borer, October 30, • 2002 (~) Results of Focused Delhi Sands Flower-Loving Fly Survey on Six Parcels, City of Rancho Cucamonga, Ecological Saences, December 21, 2001 /"t ~~ ~~ Sent, By: Planning Research In#'1~ r1 U 714 505 1870; Nov-20~ 8:52PM; Page 313 Inibal Study for DRC2002-00751 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 25 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I ceMy that I am ~e applicant for the protect described in this Inihal Study. I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures, Further, I have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or miflgate the effects to a point where clearly no slgnificam environmental effects would owur. 1 Signature. ~~ ~ ~ Date- 2-° D oZ. Prmt Name and Title. ~ ~^~ ~ r"~ r f %ri.[s-tie-- r- ~ L_J City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Negative Declaration is being cvculated for public n:vrew rn accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No : Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16009 and Development Review DRC2002-00751 Public Review Period Closes: May 14, 2003 Project Name: Vineyards West Project Applicant: RKW Development Corporation Project Location (also see attached map): Located at the southeast corner and southwest corner of 6th Street and Charles Smith Avenue - APN 229-263-05 and 229-283-04 and 05 Project Description: The subdivision of 4 86 acres of land into 4 parcels and related development of four industrial buildings totaling 54,662 square feet in the General Industrial District (Subarea 13) FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding. ^ The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment ® The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but (1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project as revised may have a significant effect on the environment If adopted, the Negatwe Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. Reasons to support this finding are included m the attached Initial Study The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period. Mav 14. 2003 Date of Determination Adopted By ~ ~~ ~a RESOLUTION NO 03-69 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16009, A SUBDIVISION OF 4 66 ACRES INTO 4 PARCELS IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 13), LOCATEDATTHE SOUTHEAST CORNER AND SOUTHWEST CORNER OF 6TH STREET AND CHARLES SMITH AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 229-263-05 AND 229-283-04 AND 05 A Rectals 1 RKW Development Corporation filed an application for approval of Tentatwe Parcel Map SUBTPM16009, as descnbed m the title of this Resolution Hereinafter m this Resolution, the subtect Tentative Parcel Map request is referred to as "the application " 2 On December 11, 2002, and continued to January 8, February 26, March 26, Apnl 23, and May 14, 2003, the Plannmg Commission held a duly advertised public heanng for the above- descnbed map 3 All legal preregwsdes pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is herebyfound, detennmed, and resolved bythe Plannmg Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth m the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng on December 11, 2002, and January 8, February 26, March 26, Apnl 23, and May 14, 2003, mGudmg wntten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby speafically finds as follows a The application applies to three parcels of land on 4 86 acres of land at the southeast comer and southwest comer of 6th Street and Charles Smith Avenue, and b The applicant proposes to subdivide the project site into four parcels, and c The property to the south of the subtect site is improved vnth one office and one mdustnal bwldmg, the property to the east is the I-15 Freeway, and the properties to the north and west are vacant, and d Two residential homes exist on-site that have been determined to be non-histonc and are proposed to be removed, and e The property is located wnthm a designated Delhi Sands flower-loving fly habitat • zone, and f The site has 65 venous speGes of hentage trees, and Access into the site is from Charles Smith Avenue, and A ,C ~3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 03-69 SUBTPM16009 - RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION May 14, 2003 Page 2 h The property abuts the I-15 Freeway to the east, and i. Accompanying this application is a proposal to construct four industnal/manufactunng buildings (Development Review DRC2002-00751) 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a The Tentative Parcel Map is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code, and b The design or improvements of the Tentative Parcel Map is consistent wrath the General Plan and the Development Code, and The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed, and d The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat, and e The Tentative Parcel Map is not likely to cause senous public health problems, and f The design of the Tentative Parcel Map wall not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, togetherwnth all wntten and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project well have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitonng Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a That the Mitigated Negative Decaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration wrath regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that Hell result if the protect is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect, which are listed below as Conditions of Approval c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considenng the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed protect vnll have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resourrzs orthe habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning L A ,C ~`1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 03-69 SUBTPM16009 - RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION May 14, 2003 Page 3 Commission dunng the public heanng, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(o-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations 5 Based upon the findings and contusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition set forth below Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this refen:nce Enaineennn Division 1) All street frontages shall be improved including, but not limrtedto, curbs and guriers, sidewalks, dnve approaches, streetlights, street trees, signing, stnping, etc , and as required Charles Smith Avenue is a Gty Industnal Local street, 6th Street rs a City Mator Divided Artenal west of Charles Smith Avenue and Mator Artenal/Secondary east of Charles Smith Avenue The transition from Mator Divided to Malor Secondary rs sub/ect to Traffic Engineer approval 2) Complete the south side of 6th Street, including parkway under the freeway The parkway may be a 4 5-foot Hnde curb adtacent sidewalk. If the bodge abutment interferes, then a special design shall be submitted to the City for consideration 3) Improvements to 6th Street shall inGude removal and reconstruction of existing a c pavement to centerline of the street 4) Provrde appropnate improvements for proper transitions and Corning of exsting improvements 5) The transportation fee credit and/or reimbursement may be utilized for 6th Street improvements The exact limns of improvements eligible shall be detennined dunng plan check consistent Huth the backbone concept 6) Provrde easement for the stone drain and coordinate with other agencies for underground utility relocation/easement 7) Process street vacation Charles Smith Avenue shall not be vacated until the new Charles Smith Avenue is constructed 8) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electncal) on the protect side of Charles Smdh Avenue shall be undergrounded along the entire protect frontage extending to the first pole off site (north and south), poor to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first All services crossing 6th Street shall be undergrounded at the same time The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the Gty adopted cost for . undergrounding from future development as it occurs on the opposite side of the street If the developer fads to submit for said reimbursement agreement within six months of the public A ~C PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 03-69 SUBTPM16009 - RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION May 14, 2003 Page 4 improvements being accepted by the City, all nghts of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate 9) An in lieu-fee as a contnbution for future undergrounding of the ewsUng overhead utilities (telecommunications and electncal except for the 66 kv electncal) on the opposite side of 6th Street shall be paid pnor to issuance of building pennits The fee shall beone-half the Gty adopted unit amount times the length of the frontage 10) The developer shall obtain a Caltrans encroachment pertnd pnor to issuance of building permits Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-stabilizing agent (approved by South Coast Air Quality Management Distnct and Regional Water Quality Control Board) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance v~nth SCAQMD Rule 403 2) Charles Smith Avenue and 6th Street shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions assoGated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when Hnnd speeds exceed 25 miles per hourto minimize PM~o emissions from the site dunng such episodes 4) Chemical sod stabilizers (approved by South Coast Air Quality Management Distnct and Regional Water Quality Control Board) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions 5) The construction contractor shall select the construction egwpment used on-site based on low emission factors and high-energy effiGency The construction contractor shall ensure the Construction Grading Plans include a statement that all construction equipment wall be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturers' speGfications 6) The construction contractor shall utilize electnc or clean alternative fuel powered egwpment where feasible 7) The construction contractor shall ensure that Construction-Grading Plans incude a statement that work crews will shut off egwpmentwhen not in use 8) If the industnal buildings assoGated vnth Development Review DRC2002-00750 are constructed concurrently with the industnal r ~ L_J ~C ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 03-69 SUBTPM16009 - RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION May 14, 2003 Page 5 buildings assoGated with Development Review DRC2002-00751, the contractor shall use low volatile organic compound paints sprayed over a penod of 65 days Bro/og~cal 1) In order to preserve the Oaktree in its existing location, the grade level well need to be preserved for a distance of 25 feet out from the trunk in all directions This area is the root preservation zone and no development or construction operations may occur therein 2) Pnor to grading, a fence shall be constructed to minimize potential damage to the root zone 3) The final Landscape Plan shall show that no landscape or other encroachment shall occur within the root zone The surface of the root preservation area shall be treated with decomposed granite, organic compost, or cobblestones in order to create anaesthetically appealing texture Hazards 1) Pnor to issuance of demolition permits, the applicant shall have an asbestos survey completed for the structures A report of findings shall be presented to the Building OffiGal month the application for a demalrtron permit Should the survey show asbestos is present, the applicant shall follow the recommendations made in the report for proper treatment and/or removal dunng demolition 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF MAY 2003. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Larry T McNiel, Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of May 2003, by the following vote-to-wnt ~ ,C ~~- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 03-69 SUBTPM16009 - RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION May 14, 2003 Page 6 AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES• COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS ~_~ ~C r~ City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16009 and Development Review DRC2002-00751 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration fortheabove-listed protect This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code) Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect 2 A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who will take action, what action wdl be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. . 3 The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the protect The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The protect planner oversees the MMP and rewews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures -The following steps wdl be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All monitoring and reporting documentation wdl be kept in the protect fde with the department having the original authority for processing the protect Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 a ~c. S°~ Mitigation Monitonng Program SUBTPM16009 and DR2002-00751 March 26, 2003 Page 2 3 Appropnate speaalists wdl be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed, as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropnate wntten approvals to the protect planner 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reportmg Forrn After each measure is venfied for compliance, no further action is regwred for the specific phase of development 5 All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requmng no further momtonng will be signed off as completed by the protect planneror responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reportmg Form 6 Unanticipated arcumstances may anse requmng the refinement or addition of mitigation measures The protect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions An MMP Reportmg Forrn wdl be completed bythe protect planneror responsible Citydepartment and a copy provided to the appropnate design, construction, or operational personnel. The protect planner or responsible City department has the authonty to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occumng afterwntten • notification has been issued The project planneror responsible City department also has the authonty to hold certificates of occupanaes if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occumng. The protect planner or responsible City department has the authonty to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented 8 Any conditions (mitigation) that regwre monitonng after protect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division The Division shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or payfor City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required penod of time 9 In those instances requmng long-term protect momtonng, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for momtonng the mitigation activities at the protect site and reporting the momtonng results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented The momtonng/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner pnor to the issuance of building permits t~ ~~ i MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: SUBTPM16009 & DRC2002-00751 Applicant: RKW Development Corporation Initial Study Prepared by: Warren Morelton Date: November 18, 2002 .. . . .. . . . ~ .. ~ ' - . . . Air Quality ~ - _ ,~. ,,. ~+.'y~•r . ~, , .., n ~, '~ ~~' ~ n~~~,..~,. ,,~~ ' r. . r ,,•. _ , ~ r ~. , The site shall be treated with water or other soil stabilizing agent CP C Review of la A/C (approved by South Coast Av Quality Management Distnct a d p ns 2 n Regional W ater Duality Control Board) daily to reduce PM,o emission, in acwrdance wdh SCAQMD Rule 403 Charles Smith Avenue and 6th Street shall be swept according to a CP C Review of plans schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions assoaated 2 vnth vehiGe tracking of sod off-sne Tmmg may vary depending upon time of year of censWction Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 CP C Review of plans mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site dunng such episodes 2 Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWDCB) shall CP C Review of plans be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 2 hours or more to reduce PM,a emissions The consWCtlon contractor shall select the censWGion equpment CP C Review of plans p used on-site based on low emission factors and high~nergy effiaency The construction conUaclor shall ensure the censWGion grading plans include a statement that all construGion equipment wall be tuned and maintained m accordance wdh the manufacturers'speafications The construction contractor shall utilize electncor Gean alternative fuel CP C Review of plans 2 powered equipment where feasible The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading CP/CE B!C Review of plans A/C 2 plans include a statement that work news volt shut off egwpment when net in use If the industrial buildings assoaated with Development Review CP A Review of plans A/C 4 DRC2002-00750 are censWcted concurrently with the mdustnal buldings associated wiN Development Review DRC2002-00751, the contractor shall use low volatile organic compound paints sprayed over a penod of 65 days Biological Resources ~ `"~ ~ ~~ °~ ' ~ ' ~ r , - Inorder topreserve the Oak tree in its existing location the grade level CP C Review of plans A/C 2 will need to be preserved for a distance of 25 feel out from the trunk in all dveclions This area is the root preservation zone and no development or censtruGion operations may occur therein Prior to grading, a fence shall be constructed to mmim¢e potential CP C Review of plans A/C 2 damage to the root zone 7~ i • .. ... -. . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . Biological Resources (contlriued)s~~~~ ~ ~~~,J ' *Y~ G~ ` ~~ x °' " - ~. x r; ^~~~fM r~%' "- l t.b ~. p ~tSn { )4 .1LW. 3A I 1'~. Ay, i. ~ , ,4~6•~~~'['+p~r '~'' r The final landscape plan shall show that no landscape or other CP C Review of plans AIC y encroachment shall occurwithin the root zone ThesuRace of the root preservation area shall be treated with decomposed granite, organic compost or cobblestones m order to create an aesthetically appealing texture Hazards - ~ sw~~-~' '~*~,~ =#f+r.~ ~~,~ "~~Eft~~:~ =~~&;~r :.~1~r;~d~k;*« _/ ~s ,. - , . Pnor to Issuance of demolition permits, the applicant shall have an CP C Review of plans P/D 2 asbestos survey completed for the structures A report of findings shall ba presented to the Bulding OffiGal Huth the application for a demolition permit Should the survey show asbestos Is present, the applicant shail follow the recemmendations made in the report for proper treatment and/or removal dunng demolition Key to Checklist Abbreviations Responsible Person ~ •~ MonttoiingEiequency~i' "r~`~31'i"'~ x4..RAx..'Nd38'.i-1 .}.,(5$~:tlt ~„~ 'Metliodbf-V'e"'ritleatlons ~t' ~ s~~*~'sfr ~ci~ xa4"kdu~ t/(~Ob6x. fy l,L~Vu 9l1~ '§erie'tl'ons - IiM34LrX" }~ .'(i. ~• , COD -Community Development Director or designee A -With Each New Development A - On-site Inspection 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map CP -City Planner or designee B - Pnor To ConsWCfion B -Other Agency Permit I Approval 2 -Withhold Grading or Bwldmg Permit CE -City Engineer or designee C -Throughout C.OnstfLCtiOn C -Plan Check 3 -Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO -Building OffiGal or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (Reports /Studies /Plans) 4 -Stop Work Ober PO -Police Captain or designee E -Operating 5 - Refain Deposit or Bonds FC - Fue Chief or designee 6 -Revoke CUP n~ `1./ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM'16009 SUBJECT: SUBDIVISION OF 4 86 ACRES OF LAND INTO 4 PARCELS APPLICANT: RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SOUTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST CORNERS OF 6TH STREET AND CHARLES SMITH LOCATION: AVENUE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: ~. General Requirements The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or m the alternative, to relingwsh such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the Crty, its agents, officers, or employees may be regwred by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, partiGpate at its own expense (without applicant's reimbursement) in the defense of any such action but such partiapaUon shall not relieve applicant of its other obligations under this condition Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 03-69, Standartt Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full stze) The sheet(s) are for mfonnation only to all parties involved in the constntdion/grading activities and are not regwred to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect B. Time Limits This tentative trail map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which . inGude site plans, architectural elevations, extenor matenals and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, and Development Code regulations St:-0B-0z A,C `~3 Completion Date / / -/-~ -~ /- / / Protect No SUBTPM16009 All site, grading, landscape, trrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 3 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of bwlding permit issuance All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits D. Landscaping 1 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the requved landscape plans and shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be regwred by the Engineering Division. 2 Special landscape features such as mounding, and west of Charles Smith Avenue only, meandering sidewalks (with horizontal change), is regwred along 6th Street 3 Landscaping and irrigation systems regwred to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this protect area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 4 On protects which abut the I-15 Freeway, the developer shall provide landscaping within the freeway right-of-way along the boundary of this protect or pay an in-lieu of construction cash deposit The landscape and irrigation plans shall be prepared in conformance with Caltrans and City Standards through the City of Rancho Cucamonga Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and City Engineer Landscape and irrigation shall be installed prior to the release of occupancy of the protect If final approvals and/or installation are not complete at that time, the City will accept a cash deposit for future landscaping of the Caltrans right-of-way E. Environmental Mitigation measures are regwred for the protect The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $ 719 00 prior to the issuance of budding permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions requved by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forteit APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) F. General Requirements Submit five complete sets of plans including the following Site/Plot Plan; Completion Date -/-/- -/-/- ~-/- -/-/- -/-J. ~_/. _/_/~ ~_/_ -/-/~ SC-OB-02 2 ~ 1 ~ ~~ Protect No SUBTPM76lH)9 Comoleaon Date b Foundation Plan, • c Floor Plan, d Ceding and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and au conditioning, and g Planning Division Protect Number (i e , TT #, CUP #, DR #, etc) clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance 4 Separate permits are regwred for fencing and/or walls 5 Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the Building and Safety Division G. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction Ail plans shall be marked with the protect file number (i e , SUBTPM16009) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development protect or mator addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division prior to permits issuance 3 4 5 6 SC-08-02 Street addresses shall be provided by the Bulding and Safety Official after tracUparcel map recordation and prior to issuance of bulding permits Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Division's public counter) The following is required for side yard use for increase in allowable area a Provide a reduced site plan (8 Yz" x 11 "), which indicates the non-bwldable easement b Recorded "Covenant and Agreement for the Maintenance of a Non-Bwldable Easement," which is signed by the appropriate property owner(s) 3 ~ to ~S ~_/_ -/-/- -/-/. _/_/. ~~- -/-/- -//- ~-/_ _//. -/-/. Protect No SUBTPM16009 Completion Date H. New Structures • 1 Provide compliance with the California Buildtng Code (CBC) for property line clearances _// considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Provide compliance with the California Budding Code for regwred occupancy separations ~~_ 3 Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC _/_/_ Section 1505 4 Exterior walls shall be constructed of the regwred fire rating to accordance with CBC ~~_ Table 5-A 5 Opernngs to exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC Table 5-A _/_/_ 6 Provide smoke and heat venting to accordance with CBC Section 906 _/~ 7 Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional regwrements may be needed _/~_ I. Grading 1 Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Budding Code, City _//_ Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to _/_/_ pertorm such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at _/_/~ the time of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, ~~_ submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction protects and for ~_/_ existing buildings where improvements beng proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: J. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured _/_/_ from street centerline) 44 - 50 feet total feet on 6th Street, east of Charles Smith Avenue _/_/_ 66 feet total feet on Charles Smith Avenue _/~_ 2 Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per Ctty Standards _/_/_ 3 Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated _/_/_ or noted on the final map 4 Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way _/_/_ shall be dedicated to the City - SC-08-02 4 ' ` ~v `~ Prgect NO SUBTPM1fi009 Comolehon Date 5 The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property Interests • necessary to construct the required public Improvements, and If he/she should fall to do so, the developer shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Sections 66462 and 66462 5 at such time as the City decides to acquire the property interests required for the Improvements Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs Incurred by the Clty If the City decides to acquire the off-site property Interests required in connection with the subdivision Security for a portion of these costs shall be In the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the City, at developer's cost The appraiser shall have been approved by the Clty prior to commencement of the appraisal This condition applies in particular, but not limited to Charles Smith Avenue, north of 6th Street K. • Street Improvements All public Improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to Clty Standards Interior street improvements shall Include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street Ilghts, and street trees Construct the following perimeter street improvements Including, but not limited to Curb & AC. Side- Drive Street Street Comm Median Bike Street Name Gutter Pvmt walk Appr. Lights Trees Trail Island Trail Other X 6th Street X X e X X X b Charles Smith Avenue X X X X X X b Notes (a) Median island Includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an In-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item (e) Curvilinear west of Charles Smith Avenue Improvement Plans and Construction a Street Improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety Ilghts on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the Issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being pertormed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Clty Engineer's Office In addition to any other permits required c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and Interconnect conduit shall be Installed to the satisfaction of the Clty Engineer ~ Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along major or secondary streets and at Intefsections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the Clty Engineer ~_/_ /~- -/__1- ~~_ -/~- -/-/- ~J- SC-08-02 5 ~ 1 Prgect NO SUBTPM16009 Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer 2) Condwt shall be 3-inch (at intersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as dvected by the City Engineer f Existing Ctty roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots 4 Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program 5 Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed legend and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans Where public landscape plans are requred, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans The City Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree speaes based upon field conditions and other variables For additional information, contact Laura Bonaccorsi at extension 4023. Mm. Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Spaee Spacing Size• Oty. 6th Street Magnolia grandiflora NCN 3' 20' O C 15 gal Planting areas "Saint Marys" less than 6' Charles Smith Brachychiton Bottle Tree 5' 25' O C 15 gal Avenue o ulneus 'TREES SHALL BE 15-GALLON SIZE UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with Ctty standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the Ctty inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficienaes may require backflli soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector 3) All street trees are subtect to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Division 4) Street trees are to be planted per public Improvement plans only Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the Clty Engineer for conformance with adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all protect intersections, including driveways Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as regwred A permit shall be obtained from Caltrans for any work within the following right of-way I-15 at 6th Street Comoleaon Date _~-~- / / ~-~- ~~- ~~- ~~- -~-~- SC-OS-02 6 ~ ,~ ~~ Prgect No SUBTPM1ii009 Comoletion Date ~L. Public Maintenance Areas 1 A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer M. Drainage and Flood Control 1 A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer pnor to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first All drainage faalities shall be installed as regwred by the City Engineer 2 Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surtace drainage entering the property from adjacent areas 3 Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk 4 Public storm drain easements shall be graded to convey overtlows in the event of a blockage in a sump catch basin on the public street N. Utilities 1 Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) to accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as regwred • 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requrements of the Cucamonga County Water Distract (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CCWD is regwred prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or pnor to the issuance of permits to the case of ail other residential protects 4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them O. General Requirements and Approvals Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their right of-way Caltrans A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the Ctty, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or pnor to bulding permit issuance if no map is involved APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED SC-0&02 7 ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~- ~-~_ -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~. -~-~ -~-~- -~-~- _/~- ~_~- FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT FIRE SAFETY DIVISION STANDARD CONDITIONS FD PLAN REVIEW#: PROJECT #: PROJECT NAME: DATE: PLAN TYPE: APPLICANT NAME: OCCUPANCY CLASS. FLOOR AREA (S): TYPE CONSTRUCTION: FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM REQUIRED LOCATION: FD REVIEW BY: PLANNER: FD-02-0667-A DRC2002-00751 and TPM16009 The Vineyards West October 30, 2002 V-N Automatic fire sprinkler systems with approved monitoring SEC and SWC 6 and Charles Smith Steve Locate, Fire Protection Planning Specialist Warren Morelion FIRE DISTRICT USE ONLY Outstanding Fire District Issues Status - "Cleared" when required information is entered below. Section B Issues Cleared 10/10/02- Fees in the amount of $214 paid in full Recorded by t 0 i a r 1 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMENTS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. THOSE PORTIONS OF THE PLANS COVERED BY COMMENTS IN SECTIONS B THROUGH E ARE CONSIDERED INCOMPLETE AS NOTED. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2770, EXT. 3009, TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING: PLEASE CONSIDER THIS PROJECT "INCOMPLETE" UNTIL ITEMS IN SECTIONS "B" THROUGH "E" ARE CORRECTED OR ADDRESSED A. Outstanding Fire District Completeness Issues Affecting Approval of Protect 1 There are no outstanding Fire District "completeness" items for this protect. Any conditions, comments, or corrections are technical in nature and shall be addressed prior to issuance of required permits or a certificate of occupancy as indicated. B. Fire District Fees 1 No Fees Due. All fees due at this time have been paid. • • t~ l~ Largest 18,537 s f of 4 Buildings C. Commurnty Facdities Distracts Annexation 1 There are no Fire District annexation issues for this project. It is located within an existing Community Facilities District for fire protection D. Available Water Supply 1 There are no Fire District water supply or fve flow issues for this protect based on one of the following: a The required verification of available water supply has been received The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distract WaterAvadabdity for Fire Protechon Form has been completed by the Water Distract and submitted to the Fve Safety Division, or b The ro ect does not re uve roof of available water su I or additional fire flow E. Fire District Access Issues to Be Addressed Immediately 1 No Access Problems: There are no outstanding "incompleteness" items related to FD access for this protect For outstanding technical issues see below RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT- STANDARD CONDITIONS & REQUIREMENTS - General, Procedural, Technical, or Operational Information that shall be Included, Corrected, or Completed as noted below. The following are applicable to this project: FSR-1 General Reqwrements for Public and Private Water Supply 1 General Guidance for Fire Hydrants• The following provides general gwdance for the spaang and location of fire hydrants Remember these are the maximum permitted distances between fire hydrants a The maximum distance between fire hydrants m commeraal/industrial protects is 300-feet. No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs the distance shall not exceed 100-feet b Fire hydrants are to be located 1 At the entrance(s) to a protect from the existing public roadways This includes subdivisions and industrial parks 2 At intersections 3 On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible 4 As required by the Fue Safety Division to meet operational needs 5 The location of fire hydrants is based upon the operational needs of the Fire Distract to control afire 6 Fire hydrants shall be located a minimum of forty (40) feet from any building Contact the Fue Safe Division 909 477-2770 2 Minimum Fire Flow with Automatic Fire Sprinklers: The requred minimum fue flow for this protect is 2250 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch This flow reflects a 50 percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire sprinkler system with central station monitoring This regwrement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix.111-A, as amended, and Fire District Ordinances and Standards 3 Hydrants Used to Supply Fire Flow. Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radws of the proposed protect may be used to provide the required fire flow subtect to Fire District review and approval Private fire hydrants on adtacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow Contact the Fve Safety Division (909) 477-2770 4 Show Existing Fire Hydrants and Mains. Existing fire hydrants and mans within 600-feet of the protect shall be shown on the water plan submitted for review and approval Include main size FSR-2 Private (On-Site) Water and/or Fire Sprinkler Underground Plans for Fire Protection 1 Exceeds Allowable Distance: When any portion of a facility or bulding is located more than 150-feet from a fire hydrant located on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the regwred fire flow shall be provided The distance is measured as vehicular path of travel on access roadways, not line of sight Contact the Fve Safety Diwsion (909) 477-2770 2 Number of Fire Hydrants Prowde one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow or fraction thereof, subtect to standard spaang and distribution regwrements Contact the Fve Safety Diwsion (909) an-2no 3 Fire Sprinkler Underground: Prior to the issuance of a fire sprinkler system permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground to the Fire Safety Division for approval Contact the Fve Safety Diwsion (909) 477-2770 FSR-3 Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems- Technical Comments 1 Required Installations: Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance 15 or other adopted code or standard, requires an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed m any of the following a Commercial or industrial structures greater than 7,500 square feet Contact the Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770 FSR-4 Fire District Site Access- Technical Comments 1 Access Roadways Defined: Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets, and highways, as well as private roads, streets, drive aisles and designated fve lanes 2 Location of Access: All portions of the structure or faality or any portion of the exterior wall of the first story shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measured by an unobstructed approved route around the exterior of the bwlding Landscaped areas, unpaved changes m elevation, gates, and fences are an obstruction 3 Private Roadways and Fire Lanes: The minimum specifications for private fire district access roadways are a The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet b The inside tum radius shall be 20-feet c The outside tum radius shall be not less than 50-feet d The minimum radds for cut-de-sacs is 45-feet e The minimum vertical clearance is 14 feet, 6 inches f At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet g The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9 degrees or 20 percent h The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12% i Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW) ~ `C ~ 0"a • 4 Access Doorways: In addition to any exterior opening regwred by the Building or Fire approved doorways, axessible wdhout the use of a ladder, shall be provided as follows a In buildings without high-piled storage, one or more approved access doors shall be provided in150 lineal feet or major fraction thereof along the exterior wall that faces regwred access roadways or walkways b In buldings with high-piled storage one or more approved access doors shall be provided in each 100 lineal feet or major fraction thereof, of the exterior wall that faces required access roadways W hen a railroad siding is installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fire Distract access to all re cared o enin s Contact the Fire Safe Division at 909 477-2770 5. Access Walkways: Approved access walkways shall be provided from the fue apparatus access road to all regwred bwlding exterior openrngs 6 Fire Lane Identrfication: All required fire lanes shall be identrfied by red curbing and signage A drawing of the proposed signage that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be submitted to and approved Contact the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distract at (909) 477-2770 for a copy of the FD Fire Lanes standard SCR-10 Hazard Control Permits- Technical Comments The below indicated permit requirements are based on those permits commonly associated with the protects operations or budding construction As noted below Special Permits may be required, dependent upon approved use(s) the applicant must contact the Fire Safety Division for specific information Note: Carefully review the items below. There may be significant impact on the proposed protect. Italicized text indicates a Rancho Cucamonga Fire District amendment. 1 General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the tudgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property 2 To install any access control device, system, or any material under, upon or within the required fire distract access roadway This includes any gate, bamer, traffic-calming device, speed bump, speed hump or any device that delays, slows, or restricts Fire Distract response 3 High piled combustible storage 4 Pallets Idle storage, handling, repair, or manufacturing of combustble pallets in excess of 100 units at any one site FSR-11 Hazardous Materials -Compliance with Disclosure and Reporting Regulations The San Bernardino County Fve Department shall review your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for compliance with minimum standards Contact the San Bernardino County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-8400 for forms and assistance The County Fire Department is the CaUEPA Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Certificate of Occupancy Restrictions: If the facility is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by Bwlding and Safety will not be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fire Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan California Government Code, Section 65850 2 prohibits the City from issuing a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting specific hazardous material disclosure regwrements A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be required if regulated substances are to be used or stored at the new facility Contact County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-8400 for forms and assistance 2 Rental or Lease Properties• Any business that operates on rented or leased property, and is requred to submit a Plan, is required to submit a nonce to the owner of the property in writing stating that the business is subtect to the Business Emergency/Contngency Plan mandates, and has complied with the provision, and must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within 5 workin da s after receivin a r uest from the owner a ,~ X03 3 Fire District Code Adoption• The Fire Code adopted by the Fue Distract has a provision regwnng collection of information regarding hazardous materials at faalities for purposes of Fire Code implementation and emergency response FSR-12 Plan Submittal Required Nonce Requred plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 1997/98 Bulding, Fire, Mechanical, and Plumbing Codes, 1999 Electrical Code, Health and Safety Code, Public Resources Code, and RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD32, Gwdelines and Standards NOTE In addition to the fees due at this time please note that separate plan check fees for tenant improvements, fire protection systems and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed at time of submittal of plans FSR-14 Altemate Materials and Methods The Fire Safety Diwsion will review requests for aftemate materials and methods within the scope of our authority The request must be submitted on the Fue District "Application for Altemate Method" form along with supporting documents Contact the Fue Safety Division at (909) 477-2770 for assistance PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMIT- For Each Development Phase 1 Fire District Site Access Plan: Prior to the issuance of any grading permit the applicant shall submit a Fire District Site Access Plan to the Fire Distract for rewew and approval The following, minimum information and detail shall be included a on a scaled site plan a All roadways shall be clearly indicated Including roadway width, vertical clearances, cul-de-sac width, turn radu, curb cuts, angle of departure, grades, etc b For private roadways or drive aisles less than 40-feet or less in width where parking may be permitted, identify the location of proposed fire lanes c Include a note stating all regwred fire lanes shall be identified by red curbing and signage d Include detail(s) to identify which of the methods set forth in the Fire District "Fve Lane" standard will be used to mark the fire lane A copy of the Fire District "Fire Lane" Standard can be obtained by calling (909) 477-2770 e Roadway with a width of more than 40-feet parking is permitted on both sides f Roadway with a width of 32-feet or more parking is permitted on one side only g The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9 degrees or 20 percent h The grade of any fire district access roadway shall not exceed 12 percent i If water plans have been approved, include fire hydrant, control valves, and fire department connection locations If water plans are not approved fire hydrant, control valves, and fire department connection locations shall be included on the Final Site Access Plan Contact the Fire Safe Division at 909 477-2770 for assistance PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS- Complete the following: 1 Private/On-site Fire Hydrants. Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for rewew and approval by the Fire District Plans and installation shall comply with Fire Distract standards Contac the Fire Safety Diwsion for a copy of "Fire District Notes for Underground and Water Plans "Contact the Fire Safety Diwsion (909) 477-2770 2. Private Fire Hydrants/On-site Installation• All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable prior to delivering any combustible building materials on-site (i a ,lumber, roofing materials, etc) A representative of Fire Construction Services shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The bwlder/developer shall submit final test and inspection report to the Fire Safety Division Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 • • A,C ~0~ 3 Public Fire Hydrants: Prior to issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and the Water District On the plan show all existing fve hydrants within a 600-foot radws of the protect Contact the Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770 4 Public Installation: All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable prior to delivering any combustible building materials on-site (i a ,lumber, roofing materials, etc) Water District personnel shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The bwlder/developer shall submit a copy of the Water District inspection report to the Fire Safety Division Contact Water District to schedule testing 5 Building Use Letter- Required Letter: Prior to the issuance of any bulding permits, the applicant shall submit a detailed letter of intended use for each bulding on-sde to the Fire District for review and approval A form that may be used to meet this requvement is attached at the end of the Fire District comments Contact the Fve Safety Division (909) 477-2770 PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION- Complete the following: 1 Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, °Installahon of Re/lect~ve Hydrant Markers " On private property these markers are to be maintained in good condition by the property owner Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 2 Private Fire Hydrants- Final Acceptance• For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional test of the on-site fire hydrants shall be conducted by the bwlder/developer m the presence of the Water District or Fve Construction Services, as appropriate The bwlder/developer shall submit the final test report to the Fire Safety Division 3 Fire Sprinkler System- Plans and Permit: Plans for the required automatic fire sprinkler system shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for review and approval. No work is allowed without a Fire Construction Services permit Contact Bulding and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 4 Flre Sprinkler System- Final Inspection: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 5. Sprinkler Monitoring The fire sprinkler system monitoring system shall be installed, tested, and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system Monitoring is requred with 20 sprinklers in Group I Occupancies, or 100 or more sprinklers in all other Occupancies Contact Budding and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 6 Access ControUTreffic Calming Device Permit A Fire District pennrt is regwred to install any access control device, trafficcalming device, or gate on any access roadway Applicable CC&R's, or other approved documents, shall contain provisions that prohibd obstructions such as traffic~alming devices (speed bumps, humps, etc ), control gates, bollards, or other modrfications in fire lanes or access roadways without prior written approval of the Fire District, Fire Safety Division 7 Knox Rapid Entry System: A Knox rapid entry key vault shall be installed prior to final inspection Proof of purchase shall be submitted poor to final building plan approval Contact the Fire Safety Dmsion for specdic details and ordering information Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 for inspection 8 Construction Access: Fire District access, a minimum 26-feet in width and 14-feet, 6-inches minimum clear height shall be provided These minimum clearances shall be maintained free and clear of any obstructions at all times, in accordance with Fve District Standards Contact the Fire Safety Dmsion (sos> a77-z77o 9 Site Directory: A bulding or site directory shall be provided, as noted below a Lighted directory within 20-feet of each primary entrance to the site The site directory shall be constructed, located, and installed in accordance with Fire Safety Division Standards Contact the Fire Safet Division at 909 477-2770 ~l~C ~~~ 10 Fire Lanes: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire lanes shall be installed in accordance with the approved fire lane plan The CC&R's or other approved documents shall contain an approved fire lane map and provisions that prohibit parking in the fve lanes The method of enforcement shall be documented The CC&R's shall also identify who is responsible for not less than annual inspection and maintenance of all required fire lanes Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 11. Address- Other Than Single-family: New bwldings other than single-family dwellings shall post the address wdh mirnmum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness When the building setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street an additional non-illuminated 6-inch mirnmum number address shall be provided at the property entrance Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 12 Mutts-unit Complexes: In mutts-unrf complexes approved address numbers, and/or bwldmg identrfication letters shall be provided on the front and back of all units, Buttes, or bwldings The Fire District shall review and approve the numbering plan in coordination wtth the City of Rancho Cucamonga Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 13 High-pile Combustible Storage•Perrnit: The applicant ~s required to obtain a Fire D~stnct Permtt for Storage of High-pile Combustible material Contact the Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770 14 High-pile Combustible Storage- Plans: The applicant shall submit plans for the storage arrangement to Fire Construction Services The applicant shall submtt deta0ed plans and a Commodity Analysis report to Fire Construction Services for approval If the occupancy classrfication for the bwldmg is designated as Group S, Division 2, commodities stored shall be limtted to light hazard classrfication only Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713. 15 Business Emergency/Contingency Plan: The applicant shall submit a Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for emergency release or threatened release of hazardous materials and wastes or provide a letter of exemption Contact the County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials/Emergency Response and Enforcement Division at (909) 367-8400 16 Submittal to the Fire District: Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy a copy of the County Fire Department approved Business Emergency/Contingency Plan -New Business (Hazardous Materials Release Response Plans and Inventory) shall be submitted to the Fire District In some cases additional information that is not in the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan may be required in order to support local fve prevention and emergency response programs. Contact Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770 17 Required County Permits: The applicant shall be requved to apply for one or more of the following Hazardous Materials Handler Permit, a Hazardous Waste Generator Permit, an Aboveground Storage Tank Permit, and/or an Underground Storage Tank Permit Contact the County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials Division/Fve Services Section at (909) 387-3080. 18 Risk Management Plan: The applicant must demonstrate that the facility has met or is meeting all Risk Management Plan (RMP) regwrements if regulated substances are to be handled at the facility Contact the County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials/Emergency Response and Enforcement Division at (909) 387-8400 19 Fve District Confidential Business Occupancy Information: The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distract "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" Form and submit to the Fire Safety Division This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subject bwldmg or property Contact Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770 Fire Distract Preliminary Review Letter -Template SL 10/10/02 Revision C~ A t ~ \ lt.[J RESOLUTION NO 03-70 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2002-00751, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF FOUR INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS ON 4 86 ACRES OF LAND IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 13), LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER AND SOUTHWEST CORNER OF 6TH STREET AND CHARLES SMITH AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 229-263-05 AND 229-283-04 AND 05 A Rentals 1 RKW Development Corporation filed an application for approval of Development Revew DRC2002-00751, as descnbed m the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subtect Development Review request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the January 8, 2003, and continued to January 8, February 26, March 26, Apnl 23, and May 14, 2003 the Plamm~g Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the application All legal preregwsites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved bythe Plamm~g Commission of the Cdy of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby spenfically finds that all of the facts set forth m the Rentals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced meeting on December 11, 2002, and January 8, February 26, March 26, Apnl 23, and May 14, 2003, including wntten and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby spenfically finds as follows a The application applies to three parcels on 4 86 acres of land at the southeast comer and southwest comer of 6th Street and Charles Smith Avenue, and b The applicant proposes to develop four industnal bwldings, and c The property to the south of the subject site is improved vwth one office and one industnal bwlding, the property to the east is the I-15 Freeway, and the properties to the north and west are vacant, and d Two residential homes ewst on-site that have been determined to be non-histonc, which are proposed to be removed, and e The property is located vnthin the Gty's designated Delhi Sands flower-loving fly habitat zone, and f The site has 65 vanous spenes of hentage trees, and Access into the site is from Charles Smith Avenue, and a ,c, \o~- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 03-70 DRC2002-00751 - RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION May 14, 2003 Page 2 The property abuts the I-15 Freeway to the east, and i Accompanying this application is a proposal to subdivide the three-parcel site into four parcels (Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16009) 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referencedmeeting on December 11, 2002, including wntten and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds and conGudes as follows. a That the proposed protect is consistent with the obtectives of the General Plan and Development Code, and b That the proposed design is in accord with the obtectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the distnct in which the site is located, and c That the proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code, and d That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, Nall not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or matenally intunous to properties or improvements in the vicinity 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative DeGaration, togethervnth all wntten and oral reports inGuded forthe environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect Nell have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitonng Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a That the Mitigated Negative DeGaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative DeGaration with regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that vnll result if the protect is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect, which are listed below as Conditions of Approval c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Tale 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considenng the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative DeGaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed protect Nell have potential for an adverse impact upon Nnldlife resources orthe habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission dunng the meeting, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(o-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations ~~ ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 03-70 DRC2002-00751 - RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION . May 14, 2003 Page 3 5 Based upon the findings and contusions set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Ens tineennn Diwsion 1) All street frontages shall be improved including, but not limned to, curbs and gutters, sidewalks, dove approaches, streetlights, street trees, signing, striping, etc ,and as regwred Charles Smith Avenue is a Gty Industrial Local street, 6th Street is a Crty Major Drnded Arterial, west of Charles Smith Avenue and Major Arterial/Secondary east of Charles Smith Avenue The transition from Mator Divided to Mayor Secondary is subject to Traffic Engineer approval 2) Complete the south side of 6th street, including parkway under the freeway The parkway may be a 4.5-foot wide curb adjacent sidewalk If the bridge abutment interferes, then a speual design shall be submitted to the City for consrderetion 3) Improvements to 6th Street shall include removal and reconstruction of . existing a c pavement to centerline of the street 4) Provide appropriate improvements for proper transitions and joining of ewsting improvements 5) The transportation fee credit and/or reimbursement may be utilized for 6th Street improvements The exact limits of improvements eligible shall be detemtmed during plan check consistent wrath the backbone concept 6) Provide easement for the storm drain and coordinate with other agenaes for underground utility relocatron/easement 7) Process street vacation Charles Smith Avenue shall not be vacated until the new Charles Smith Avenue is constructed 8) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the protect side of Charles Smith Avenue shall be undergrounded along the entire protect frontage extending to the first pole off site (north and south), prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first All services crossing 6th Street shall be undergrounded at the same time The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development as it occurs on the opposite side of the street If the developer fads to submit for said • reimbursement agreement within six months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 03-70 DRC2002-00751 - RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION May 14, 2003 Page 4 9) An in lieu-fee as a contribution for future undergroundmg of the ewsUng overhead utilities (telecommurnGations and electrical except for the 66 kv electrical) on the opposite side of 6th Street shall be paid prior to issuance of budding permits The fee shall beone-half the Gty adopted unit amount times the length of the frontage 10) The developer shall obtain a Caltrans encroachment permit prior to issuance of budding pemmits Environmental Mdiaatwn Air Quality 1) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-stabilizing agent (approved by South Coast Air Quality Management District and Regional Water Quality Control Board) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, m accordance wrath SCAQMD Rule 403 • 2) Charles Smith Avenue and 6th Street shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions assoGated wrath vehicle tracking of sod off-site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction . 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wand speeds exceed 25 miles per hour to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes 4) Chemical sod stabilizers (approved by South Coast Air Quality Management District and Regional Water Quality Control Board) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions 5) The construction contractor shall select the construction egwpment used on-site based on low emission factors and high-energy effiGency The construction contractor shall ensure the Construction Grading Plans include a statement that all construction egwpment will be tuned and maintained m accordance wrath the manufacturers' specifications 6) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible 7) The construction contractor shall ensure that Construction-Grading Plans include a statement that work crews well shut off egwpmentwhen not in use 8) If the mdustnal bwldmgs assoGated with Development Review DRC2002-00750 are constructed concurently with the mdustnal bwldmgs assoGated with Development Review DRC2002-00751, the contractor shall use low volatile organic compound paints sprayed over a period of 65 days ,~ ~ ~ ~~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 03-70 DRC2002-00751 - RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION May 14, 2003 Page 5 Bw/ogrcal 1) In order to preserve the Oak tree in its existing location, the grade level well need to be preserved for a distance of 25 feet out from the trunk in all directions This area is the root preservation zone and no development or construction operations may occur therein 2) Pnor to grading, a fence shall be constructed to minimize potential damage to the root zone 3) The final Landscape Plan shall show that no landscape or other encroachment shall occur within the root zone The surface of the root preservation area shall be treated with decomposed granite, organic compost, or cobblestones in order to create an aesthetically appealing texture Hazards 1) Pnor to issuance of demolition pennits, the applicant shall have an asbestos survey completed forthe structures A report of findings shall be presented to the Building Ofricial with the application fora demolition permit Should the survey show asbestos is present, the applicant shall follow the recommendations made in the report for proper treatment and/or removal dunng demolition The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF MAY 2003 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY ATTEST Larry T McNiel, Chairman Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of May 2003, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS ~ `'~ `~` City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16009 and Development Review DRC2002-00751 This Mitigation Momtonng Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration fortheabove-listed project This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081 6 of the Public Resources Code) Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements. 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible gwdelines As momtonng progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the protect The project planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The protect planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing momtonng or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the protect file with the department having the original authority for processing the project Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address. City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Droision 10500 Ciwc Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ~ ,c. ~~a Mitigation Monitoring Program • SUBTPM16009 and DR2002-00751 March 26, 2003 Page 2 3 Appropriate speaalists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed, as determined by the protect planner or responsible City department, to monitor speafic mitigation activities and provide appropnate written approvals to the protect planner 4. The protect planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is regwred for the speafic phase of development 5 All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requmng no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the protect planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Forrn 6 Unanticipated circumstances may arise requmng the refinement or addition of mitigation measures The protect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the protect planneror responsible Citydepartment and a copy provided to the appropnate design, construction, or operational personnel 7 The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occumng afterwntten notification has been issued The protect planneror responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupanaes if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occumng The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented 8 Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after protect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division The Division shall requre the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or payforCitystafftime to monitorand report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time In those instances regwring long-term protect momtonng, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for momtonng the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the momtonng results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. • t n \ `~ MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: SUBTPM16009 & DRC2002-00751 Applicant: RKW Develoament Corporation Initial Study Prepared by: Warren Morelion Date: November 18, 2002 .. ... •. ~ .• -. .. r • _Air Quali _~.~~~ •r~, .w -P,=,;-,r~~' ~ ~`~~.;~? firr - ` ° ~ -2? "~r?!,;:~~~~x a,hre' ik- e f't6 ~ ~ ~~• .~ ,„ f t o ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ti~° ~ ,y~, ~ : ~ ~ ~ _ ,~~, ~ ,~- ~<~ ,~ 3,w~s {~ fi' ~Y ~4 '~ •~,4-.w g n ~ .>., x t2 :' - ,a. t.~t~r-'Y{+,k ~ : ~- ^~„ti . , ~• ~-, a a+.`x+$ ,be ''i!i~ °~ a" °1 ~sk ..~4 F! < t s .,* „',7. ~ . Y. ~ 'a / .~Y,.~7x -++.~~. +:~,, z, u' The site shall be treated with water or other soil stabilizing agent CP C Review of plans AIC 2 (approved by South Coast Av Quality Management Distnct and Regional W ater Quality Control Board) daily to reduce PM,o emission, in accordance vnih SCA~MD Rule 403 Chades Smith Avenue and 6th Street shall be swept according to a CP C Review of plans 2 schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions assocated with vehiGe Vacking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of censtruction Greding operations shall be suspended when vend speeds exceed 25 CP C Review of plans 2 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RW~CB) shall CP C Review of plans 2 be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions The construction wntractor shall select the construction equipment CP C Review of plans 2 used on-site based on low emission factors and high-energy eifiGency The consWction contractor shall ensure the consWction grading plans incude a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance wdh the manufacturers'speaficalions The construction contractor shall utilize electnc or Gean alternativefuel CP C Review of plans 2 powered equipment where feasible The construction contractor shall ensure that consWction-grading CP/CE BIC Review of plans PJC 2 plans include a statement that work crews wall shut off equipmenlwhen not m use It the industnal bwldings assocated with Development Review CP A Review of plans AIC 4 DRC2002-00750 are censWcled concurrently with the Industnal buildings associated with Development Review DRC2002.00751, the contractor shall use low volatile organic compcund paints sprayed over a penod of 65 days ti .,. y... ~ ti .. ?'~~ xg.*.; ro-~n. Bfolo icalResour`ces~~ ,=s"~,~ „~-,. 9 .., aj, _ y : ",: ~rP~s~",~bx< ~z r~: ~ ~' ' ' ,-N•,};. 7e,' ,; ,' ,:~` ~,~ ` ~ ' Px ~, rt. a,.. ~,~;~ "~.>. -',_.~ ~'~ir'` s"C,~ ~ ``", " ,a ~+- v,: ; ~.v=+;. , ~.r a ; r+, ~' > " e^A. ~,~',-r„', '°~;' s ,,, u, ~ ' J 5. ~` ~°^"~. " x.,; . s.- „a _ ~,"s,t, , r , : _ < " s -1c=~„r . , ~; : ,• „[v,z r~ . ~ ~i,a.J` v;i°. ~«~: i , $sa~ ~ I , k,;i ,~t.t ' ,r , In order to preserve the Oak tree in its existing location the grade level CP C Review of plans A/C 2 will need to be preserved for a distance of 25 feet out from the trunk in all dvections This area is the root preservation zone and no development or censtruction operations may occur therein Prior to grading, a fence shall be constructed to minimize potential CP C Review of plans A/C 2 damage to the root zone it 1 i J • . • • s ... Biological Resources (continued) "~- ~" ~~-~ ='~~`~~'- _ <<; 3F.h: n,D• •JV,: s~~ ~> ~~ ~ 4'l" gg ,,~y!~~ '..'pp ti: } •~y.<S w:~.5} ~u„Q„:$' 5v^ - ~ PE a ... 't ~~'"""~~ e i :•C'.-~ " : it`s . , _ The final landscape plan shall show that no landsppe or other encroachment shall occurwithin the root zone Thesurface of the root CP C Review of plans A/C p preservation area shall be treated with decomposed granite, organic compost or cobblestones In order to create an aesthetically appealing texture Hazards ~ ~ ~ ;., -''F~, '~ `"M"~Yy" ~~~°-'cs - ~' ~ a'~~:.~'`~~~~ i4 t`th / ~~;`+' ,}~ 4r 9 f : ,a r ` ~jc A • : '~~~°'~~~ ~~ ~ g"° y" ;:ii.-~,~' r. ; u.: ,7 Pnor to issuance of demolition permRs, the apphcanl shall have an v- s CP u el C YR, Review of plans -Hy PID +TrA`~."~{s~ 4 .. I.ri~ ~T • ~ :~R1 p asbestos survey completed for the structures A report of findings shall be presented to the Building Offigal with the application for a demolition permit Should the survey show asbestos is present, the applicant shall fallow the recommendations made in the report for proper treatment and/or removal dunng demolition Key to Checklist Abbreviations Res onsible Person ~, • - "«,~.•` P - ~ ~ ~k , `., `;~, k IMo~~toFl'n "'F"' ' ~°` ~ ~ n . rr,, Y.,~~q~ency` ~ s i$ " " "« ^""'~"" "` ° r ~+ ~ o t~ o i.VerHl~ Ion k?t,+' ~y" ~t i~M ~b ~-~~~~•~ ~ ~ ~• . , nctlons~;~,;F~~, 'F: ili ~',- ':~•.. A ^„~~ CDD -Community Development Director or designee A -With Each New Development ~ u u . . u A - On-site Inspection _ ~ 7 Withh ld R CP -City Planner or designee B - Pdor To ConsWCUon B -Other Agency Permit I Approval - o ecerdation of Final Map 2 -Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE -City Engineer or designee C -Throughout ConsWctlon C -Plan Check 3 -Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO -Building Offiaal or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (Reports I Studies I Plans) 4 -Stop Work Order PO -Police Captain or designee E - Ope2ting 5 -Retain Deposit or Bonds FC - Fve Chief or designee 6 -Revoke CUP ~(/ V COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ~ DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DRC2002-00751 SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT OF 4 INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS TOTALING 54,662 SQUARE FEET APPLICANT: RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SOUTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST CORNERS OF 6TH STREET AND CHARLES SMITH LOCATION: AVENUE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: ~. General Requirements The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relingwsh such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be regwred by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at ds own expense (without applicant's reimbursement) m the defense of any such action but such partiapation shall not relieve applicant of ds other obligations under this condition Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 03-70, Standard Condibons, and all environmental mdigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved to the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect B. Time Limits Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or Development/Design Review approval shall expire if bwlding permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development 1 The site shaA be developed and maintained m accordance with the approved plans which . include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, and Development Code regulations ComoleGon Date -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- SC-08-02 1 A t ~ 1 `~ Protect No DRC2002-00751 Comolehon Date D. E. 2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all _/_/_ Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Budding Code _/~ and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Pnor to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Bwlding and Safety Division to show compliance The bwldings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be ~_/_ submitted for City Planner review and approval pnor to the issuance of budding permits 5 All site, grading, landscape, Irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for ~~_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, bwldmg, etc) or pnor to final map approval In the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes fvst 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development _J_/_ Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of bwldmg permit Issuance 7 A detailed on-site lighting plan, Including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and ~_/_ approved by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) pnor to the issuance of building permits Such plan shall Indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adtacent properties 8 Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards The final design, locations, _/_/_ and the number of trash receptacles shall be subtect to Ctty Planner review and approval pnor to the issuance of building permits 9 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall _/_/~ be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Ctty Planner For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 10 All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, _/_/_ including proper Illumination 11 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property ~_/_ owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the Ctty Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the Issuance of bwldmg permits Building Design 1 All roof appurtenances, Including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or _/_/_ protections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adtacent properties and streets as requred by the Planning Division Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Ctty Planner Details shall be Included in bwldmg plans 2 For commercial and Industrial protects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main _/_/_ bwldmg colors Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1 Ail parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long When a side of any parking space _/_/~ abuts a bwldmg, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide - SC-OS-02 2 ~ ~ ~ \ ~~ Project No DRC2002-00751 Comolehon Date 2 Ail parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb) 3 Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses 4 All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards 5 Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of bulding permits For residential development, private gated entrances shall provide adequate turn- around space in front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public right-of-way 6 Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commeraal and office facilities with 25 or more parking stalls Designate two percent or one stall, whichever is greater, of the total number of stalls for use by the handicapped 7 Motorcycle parking area shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more parking stalls Developments with over 100 parking stalls shall provide motorcycle parking at the rate of one percent The area for motorcycle parking shall be a minimum of 56 square feet F. Trip Reduction . 1 Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commercial, office, industrial, and multifamily residential protects of more than 10 units Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the regwred automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater After the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces regwred are 2 5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2 5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike rack In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces required exceed 100 Where this results in a fraction of 0 5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole number 2 Carpool and vanpool designated off-street parking close to the building shall be provided for commeraal, office, and industrial facilities at the rate of 10 percent of the total parking area If covered, the vertical clearance shall be no less than 9 feet For industrial protects with at least 40 car parking spaces, bicyclist-changing faalities shall be provided to encourage bicycle commuting Accessible restrooms with storage lockers for clothing and equipment shall be suffiaent G. Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 Existing trees regwred to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in accordance with the Muniapal Code Section 19 08 110, and so noted on the grading • plans The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and tramming methods SC-08-02 3 ~ ~~ ~~~ -/-1- ~-/_ ~~. -/~. -/_/_ -/___/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- ~-/. _/_/_ Protect No DRC2002-00751 Completion Date 3 A minimum of 20% of trees planted within industrial protects, and a minimum of 30% within _/_/_ commeraal and office prolects, shall be specimen size trees, 24-inch box or larger • 4 Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three _/~ parking stalls. 5 Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adtacent to and along structures at a rate of ~~_ one tree per 30 linear feet of bwlding 6 Ali private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than _/~_ 2 1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting regwred by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer pnor to occupancy 7 Ail private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or ~_/_ greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq tt of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting regwred by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer pnor to occupancy 8 For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible _/_/_ for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material • shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage 9 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be _/_/_ included in the regwred landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan whK;h may be regwred by the Engineering Division 10 Special landscape features such as mounding and meandering sidewalks (with horizontal _/_/_ change),is required along 6th Street 11 Landscaping and irrigation systems regwred to be installed within the public right-of-way on _/~_ the perimeter of this protect area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 12 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, _/~_ the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division 13 Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of _/~_ Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19 16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code 14 On protects which abut the I-15 Freeway, the developer shall provide landscaping within the _/J_ freeway right-of-way along the boundary of this protect or pay an in-lieu of construction cash deposit The landscape and irrigation plans shall be prepared in conformance with Caltrans and City Standards through the City of Rancho Cucamonga Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and City Engineer Landscape and irrigation shall be installed prior to the release of occupancy of the protect If final approvals and/or installation are not complete at that time, the City will accept a cash deposit for future landscaping of the Caltrans right-of-way . SC-OS-02 4 ~ ~ v ~ `~ Protect IJo DRC2002-00751 Completion Date ~H. Signs 1 The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any signs 2 A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of bwlding permits I. Environmental 1 Mitigation measures are required for the project The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $ 719 00 prior to the issuance of bwlding permits, guaranteeing satisfactory pertormance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit J. Other Agencies 1 The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bwlding permits. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) K. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following 2 a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Division Project Number (i e , DRC2002-00751) clearly identified on the outside of all plans Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are requred prior to plan check submittal -/-/- _/-/. -/-(- -/-/- /-/- -/-/- SC-08-02 5 ~ ~~ \ aO Project No DRC2002-00751 Completion Date L. M. 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation _/_/_ coverage to the City prior to permit issuance 4 Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls _/_/ 5 Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by _/_/_ the Bulding and Safety Division Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be _/~_ marked with the project file number (i e , DRC2002-00751) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Califomia Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Division far availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development project _/_/_ or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Bulding and Safety Division prior to permits issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Bulding and Safety Official after tracUparcel map _/_/_ recordation and prior to issuance of building permits 4 Construction actroity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday _/_/_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays ' ~ 5. Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Division s public _/_/ counter) 6 The following is required for side yard use for increase in allowable area _J~_ a Provide a reduced site plan (8'/z" x 11 "), which indicates the non-bwidable easement b Recorded "Covenant and Agreement for the Maintenance of a Non-Bwldable Easement," which is signed by the appropriate property owner(s) New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the California Bulding Code (CBC) for property line clearances _/_/_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Provide compliance with the California Building Code for requred occupancy separations ~_/_ 3 Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC /_/_ Section 1505 4 Exterior walls shall be constructed of the regwred fire rating in accordance with CBC _/_/_ Table 5-A 5 Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC Table 5-A _/~_ 6 Provide smoke and heat venting to accordance with CBC Section 906 _/_/_ 7 Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional regwrements may be needed ~_/~ SC-08-02 6 ~ ~n `~\ Protect No DRC2002-00751 Completion Data •N. Grading 1 Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A sobs report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is requved for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: O. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline) 44 - 50 feet total feet on 6th Street, east of Charles Smith Avenue 66 feet total feet on Charles Smith Avenue 2 Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards 3 Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map 4 Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City. 5 The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property interests necessary to construct the required public improvements, and if he/she should fail to do so, the developer shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Sections 66462 and 66462 5 at such time as the City decides to acquire the property interests requred for the improvements Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the City if the City decides to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection with the subdivision Security for a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the City, at developer's cost The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal This condition applies in particular, but not limited to Charles Smith Avenue, north of 6th Street ~-/. -/-/. -/~. ~-/. -l-/- / / -/~_ -/-/- -/~- ~~_ -/~_ -/~_ S~-Of3-az 7 ~ , C ~aa Prgect No DRC2002A0751 Completion Date P. Street Improvements All public Improvements (Interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to Curb & AC. Side- Drive Street Street Comm Median Bike Street Name Gutter Pvmt walk Appr Lights Trees Troll Island Trail Other X 6th Street X X e X X b Charles Smith Avenue X X X X X X b Notes (a) Median Island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an In-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this Item (e) Curvilinear west of Charles Smith Avenue Improvement Plans and Construction Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the Clty Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first Prior to any work being pertormed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the Clty Engineer d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along mafor or secondary streets and at Intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch (at intersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer _/~ • -/.~ _/~- ~~_ ~~- ~~- _/~- -~-~- SC-08-02 8 ~ ,C, ` P~ Protect No DRC2002-00751 Completion Date Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed legend and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans The City Engineer reserves the right to adfust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional information, contact Laura Bonaccorsi at extension 4023 Min Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size• Oty 6th Street Magnolia grandiflora NCN 3' 20' O C 15 gal Planting areas "Saint Mary's" less than 8' Charles Smith Brachychiton populneus Bottle Tree 5' 25' O C 15 gal Avenue 'TREES SHALL BE 15-GALLON SIZE UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with Clty standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic sobs report shall be furnished to the City inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may regwre backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector 3) All street trees are subfect to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Division 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy On collector or larger streets, Imes of sight shall be plotted for all protect intersections, including driveways Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required 7 A permit shall be obtained from Caltrans for any work within the following right of-way I-15 at 6th Street Q. Public Maintenance Areas A signed consent and waroer form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of bulding permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer R. Drainage and Flood Control 1 A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer 2 Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surtace drainage entering the property from adfacent areas 3 Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk 4 Public storm drain easements shall be graded to convey overtlows in the event of a blockage in a sump catch basin on the public street Sc_of3-U2 9 ~ ,c~ ~ a~ ~-~. _/_/ -~-~- -/-J- ~~_ -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~. -~~. Protect No DRC2002-00751 Comolepon Date S. Utilities 1 Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, ~_/ gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as regwred 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary ~_/_ 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the regwrements of the ~_/_ Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CCWD is regwred prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district wrthin 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential protects 4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved _/~_ Approval of the final parcel map will be subfect to any regwrements that may be received from them T. General Requirements and Approvals 1 Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their right of-way _/~_ Caltrans 2 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for _/~_ all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: U. Security Lighting 1 All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power _/~_ These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell 2 All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings, ~~_ with direct lighting to be provided by all entryways Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development 3 Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures _/~_ V. Security Hardware 1 One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors If windows are ~_/_ within 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used 2 All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices _/_/ W. Security Fencing 1 All businesses or residential communities with security fencing and gates will provide the _/_/_ police with a keypad access and a unique code The initial code is to be submitted to the Police Crime Prevention Unit along with plans If this code is changed due to a change in • personnel or for any other reason, the new code must be supplied to the Police via the 24- hour dispatch center at (909) 941-1488 or by contacting the Crime Prevention Unit at (909) 477-2800 extension 2474 or extension 2475 SGOS-02 10 (~ t~ 1 ~~ Project No DRC2002-00751 Completion Date ~X. Building Numbering 1 Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime wsibddy 2 Developer shall paint roof top numbers on one or more roofs of this development They shall be a minimum of three feet in length and two feet in width and of contrasting color to background The stenals for this purpose are on loan at the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED ~-~_ -~-~- sc-o8-o2 „ ~ ,c. ~ a~ FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT FIRE SAFETY DIVISION STANDARD CONDITIONS FD PLAN REVIEW#: PROJECT #: PROJECT NAME: DATE: PLAN TYPE: APPLICANT NAME: OCCUPANCY CLASS: FLOOR AREA (S): TYPE CONSTRUCTION: FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM REQUIRED: LOCATION: FD REVIEW BY: PLANNER: FD-02-0667-A DRC2002-00751 and TPM16009 The Vineyards West Automatic fire sprinkler systems with approved monitoring SEC and SWC 6 and Charles Smith Steve Locate, Fere Protection Planneng Specialist Warren Morelion FIRE DISTRICT USE ONLY Outstanding Fire District Issues Status - "Cleared" when required information is entered below. Section B Issues Cleared 10/10/02- Fees in the amount of $214 paid en full Recorded by ALL OF THE FOLLOWING TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMENTS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. THOSE PORTIONS OF THE PLANS COVERED BY COMMENTS IN SECTIONS B THROUGH E ARE CONSIDERED INCOMPLETE AS NOTED. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2770, EXT. 3009, TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING: PLEASE CONSIDER THIS PROJECT "INCOMPLETE" UNTIL ITEMS IN SECTIONS "B" THROUGH "E" ARE CORRECTED OR ADDRESSED A. Outstanding Fire District Completeness Issues Affecting Approval of Protect 1 There are no outstanding Fere Destrect "completeness" items for this project. Any conditions, comments, or correcteons are technical en nature and shall be addressed prior to issuance of required permits or a certificate of occupancy as indicated. B. Fire Destrect Fees 1 No Fees Due: All fees due at this time have been paed. n r~ `-....~ ~~ ~~~ Largest 18,537 s f of 4 Buildings Type V-N • • C. Community Pastilles Districts Annexation 1 There are no Fire District annexation issues for this protect. It is located within an existing Community Facilities District for fire protection - D. Available Water Supply 1 There are no Fire District water supply or fire flow issues for this project based on one of the following: a The regwred verification of available water supply has been received The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distract WaterAvatlabdity for Fire Protechon Form has been completed by the Water District and submitted to the Fve Safety Diwsion, or b The ro ect does not re wre roof of available water su I or additional fire flow E. Fve District Access Issues to Be Addressed Immediately 1 No Access Problems• There are no outstanding "incompleteness" items related to FD access for this protect For outstanding technical issues see below RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT- STANDARD CONDITIONS & REQUIREMENTS - General, Procedural, Technical, or Operational Information that shall be Included, Corrected, or Completed as noted below. The following are applicable to this project: FSR-1 General Reqwrements for Public and Private Water Supply 1 General Gwdance for Fire Hydrants: The following provides general gwdance for the spacing and location of fire hydrants Remember these are the maximum permitted distances between fire hydrants a The maximum distance between fire hydrants in commerciaVindustnal protects is 300-feet No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cut-de-sacs the distance shall not exceed 100-feet b Fire hydrants are to be located 1 At the entrance(s) to a protect from the existing public roadways This includes subdivisions and industrial parks 2 At intersections 3 On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible 4 As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs 5 The location of fire hydrants is based upon the operational needs of the Fire District to control afire 6 Fire hydrants shall be located a minimum of forty (40) feet from any budding Contact the Fire Safe Division 909 477-2770 2 Minimum Fire Flow with Automatic Fire Sprinklers: The regwred minimum fire flow for this protect is 2250 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch This flow reflects a 50 percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fve sprinkler system with central station monitoring This regwrement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as amended, and Fire District Ordinances and Standards 3 Hydrants Used to Supply Fire Flow• Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed protect may be used to provide the regwred fire flow subtect to Fire Distract review and approval Private fire hydrants on adtacent property shall not be used to provide regwred fire flow Contact the Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770 `al~ 4 Show Existing Fire Hydrants and Mains: Existing fire hydrants and mains within 600-feet of the protect shall be shown on the water plan submitted for review and approval Include mom size FSR-2 Private (On-Site) Water and/or Fire Sprinkler Underground Plans for Fire Protection 1 Exceeds Allowable Distance: When any portion of a faality or bulding is located more than 150-feet from a fire hydrant located on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, on-site fve hydrants and mains capable of supplying the regwred fve flow shall be provided The distance is measured as vehicular path of travel on access roadways, not line of sight Contact the Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770 2 Number of Fve Hydrants Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of regwred fve flow or fraction thereof, subject to standard spacing and distribution regwrements Contact the Fire Safety Division (909) a77-2no 3 Fire Sprinkler Underground: Prior to the issuance of a fire sprinkler system permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground to the Fire Safety Division for approval Contact the Fue Safety Division (909) 477-2770 FSR-3 Automatic Fue Sprinkler Systems- Technical Comments 1 Required Installations: Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance 15 or other adopted code or standard, requires an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in any of the following a Commercial or industrial structures greater than 7,500 square feet Contact the Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770 FSR-4 Fire District Site Access- Technical Comments 1 Access Roadways Defined: Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets, and highways, as well as private roads, streets, drive aisles and designated fire lanes 2 Location of Access: All portions of the structure or facility or any portion of the exterior wall of the first story shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measured by an unobstructed approved route around the exterior of the building Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates, and fences are an obstruction 3 Private Roadways and Fire Lanes: The minimum specfications for private fire distract access roadways are a The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet b The inside turn radws shall be 20-feet c The outside turn radius shall be not less than 50-feet d The minimum radws for cut-de-sacs is 45-feet e The minimum vertical clearance is 14 feet, 6 inches f At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet g The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9 degrees or 20 percent h The maximum grade of the driwng surface shall not exceed 12% i Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW) CJ /"~ ~~ ,~ 4 Access Doorways• In addition to any exterior opening regwred by the Bwlding or Fire approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided as follows a In buldings without high-piled storage, one or more approved access doors shall be provided in150 lineal feet or motor fraction thereof along the exterior wall that faces regwred access roadways or walkways b In buildings with high-ptled storage one or more approved access doors shall be provided in each 100 lineal feet or motor fraction thereof, of the exterior wall that faces required access roadways When a railroad siding is installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fire District access to all re wired o enin s Contact the Fire Safe Division at 909 477-2770 5 Access Walkways: Approved access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all regwred bwlding exterior openmgs 6 Fire Lane Identification: All requued fire lanes shall be identified by red curbing and signage A drawing of the proposed signage that meets the mmimum Fire District standards shall be subm~ted to and approved Contact the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District at (909) 477-2770 for a copy of the FD Fire lanes standard SCR-10 Hazard Control Permits-Technical Comments The below indicated permit requirements are based on those permits commonly associated with the protects operations or bwlding construction As noted below Special Permits may be required, dependent upon approved use(s) the applicant must contact the Fire Safety Division for specific information. Note: Carefully review the items below There may be significant impact on the proposed project. Italiazed text indicates a Rancho Cucamonga Fire District amendment. 1 General Use Permit shall be required for any actro~ty or operation not specifically described below, which m the tudgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property 2 To install any access control device, system, or any material under, upon or w~thm the regwred fire d~stnct access roadway This includes any gate, banner, traffic-calming device, speed bump, speed hump or any device that delays, slows, or restricts Fire D~stnct response 3 High piled combustible storage 4 Pallets. Idle storage, handling, repair, or manufacturing of combustible pallets ~n excess of 100 units at any one sde FSR-11 Hazardous Materials -Compliance with Disclosure and Reporting Regulations The San Bernardino County Fire Department shall review your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for compliance with minimum standards Contact the San Bernardino County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 367-8400 for forms and assistance The County Fire Department is the CaVEPA Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Certificate of Occupancy Restrictions. If the facility is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by Bwlding and Safety will not be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fire Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan California Government Code, Section 65850 2 prohibits the City from issuing a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or ~s meeting specific hazardous material disclosure requirements A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be regwred if regulated substances are to be used or stored at the new facility Contact County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-8400 for forms and assistance -- - 2 Rental or Lease Properties: Any business that operates on rented or leased property, and is required to submit a Plan, is regwred to submit a nonce to the owner of the property m writing stating that the business is subtect to the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan mandates, and has complied with the provision, and must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within 5 workin da s after receivin are west from the owner P~ ~G ~ 3 Fire Distract Code Adoption• The Fire Code adopted by the Fire Distract has a provision requiring collection of information regarding hazardous materials at faalities for purposes of Fire Code implementation and emergency response FSR-12 Plan Submittal Required Notice Required plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 1997/98 Bwlding, Fire, Mechanical, and Plumbing Codes, 1999 Electrical Code, Health and Safety Code, Public Resources Code, and RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD32, Guidelines and Standards NOTE In addition to the fees due at this time please note that separate plan check fees for tenant improvements, fue protection systems and/or any consultant rewews will be assessed at time of submittal of plans FSR-14 Alternate Materials and Methods The Fire Safety Division will review requests for aftemate materials and methods within the scope of our authority The request must be submitted on the Fve Distract "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents Contact the Fire Safety Division at (909) 477-2770 for assistance. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMIT- For Each Development Phase 1 Fire Distract Site Access Plan: Prior to the issuance of any grading permit the applicant shall submit a Fire District Site Access Plan to the Fire Distract for review and approval The following, minimum information and detail shall be included a on a scaled site plan a All roadways shall be clearly indicated Including roadway width, vertical clearances, cul-de-sac width, turn radu, curb cuts, angle of departure, grades, etc b For private roadways or drive aisles less than 40-feet or less in width where parking may be permitted, identify the location of proposed fire lanes c Include a note stating all regwred fve lanes shall be identified by red curbing and signage d Include detail(s) to identify which of the methods set forth in the Fire District "Fve Lane" standard will be used to mark the fire lane A copy of the Fire District "Fire Lane" Standard can be obtained by calling (909) 477-2770 e Roadway with a width of more than 40-feet parking is permitted on both sides f Roadway with a width of 32-feet or more parking is permitted on one side only g The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9 degrees or 20 percent h The grade of any fire district access roadway shall not exceed 12 percent i If water plans have been approved, include fire hydrant, control valves, and fire department connection locations If water plans are not approved fire hydrant, control valves, and fire department connection locations shall be included on the Final Site Access Plan Contact the Fire Safe Division at 909 477-2770 for assistance PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS- Complete the following: 1 Prnrate/On-site Fve Hydrants. Prior to the issuance of any bulding permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District standards Contac the Fire Safety Division for a copy of "Fire District Notes for Underground and Water Plans "Contact the Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770 2. Private Fire Hydrants/On-site Installation: All private on-site fire hydrants shall be rnstalled, flushed, and operable prior to delivering any combustible building materials on-site (i a ,lumber, roofing materials, etc) A representative of Fire Construction Services shall inspect the rnstallation and witness hydrant flushing The bwlder/developer shall submit final test and inspection report to the Fire Safety Division Contact Budding and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 r~ L~ i {~ ~ C 13\ • 3 Public Fire Hydrants: Prior to issuance of any bwlding permit, the applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the eve District and the Water District On the plan show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the protect Contact the Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770 4 Public Installation: All regwred public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable prior to delivering any combustible budding materials on-site (i a ,lumber, roofing materials, etc.) Water Distract personnel shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The bulder/developer shall submit a copy of the Water Distract inspection report to the Fire Safety Division Contact Water District to schedule testing 5 Building Use Letter- Regwred Letter: Prior to the issuance of any bwlding permds, the applicant shall submR a detailed letter of intended use for each building on-site to the Fire Distract for review and approval A form that may be used to meet this requirement is attached at the end of the Fve District comments Contact the Fire SafeTy Division (909) 477-2770 PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION- Complete the following: 1 Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and Cdy of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers " On private property these markers are to be maintained in good conddion by the property owner Contact Budding and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 2 Private Fire Hydrants- Final Acceptance: For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional test of the on-site fire hydrants shall be conducted by the builder/developer in the presence of the Water Distract or Fire Construction Services, as appropriate The builder/developer shall submit the final test report to the Fire Safety Division 3 Fire Sprinkler System- Plans and Permit: Plans for the regwred automatic fire sprinkler system shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for review and approval No work is allowed without a Fve Construction Services permit Contact Budding and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 4. Fire Sprinkler System- Final Inspection: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services Contact Bulding and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713. 5 Sprinkler Monitoring The fire sprinkler system monitoring system shall be installed, tested, and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system Monitoring is required with 20 sprinklers in Group I Occupancies, or 100 or more sprinklers in all other Occupances Contact Budding and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 6 Access ControUTraffic Calming Device Permit A Fire District permd is required to install any access control device, trafficcalming device, or gate on any access roadway Applicable CC&R's, or other approved documents, shall contain provisions that prohibit obstructions such as trafficcalming devices (speed bumps, humps, etc ), control gates, bollards, or other modrfications in fire lanes or access roadways without poor written approval of the Fve District, Fire Safety Dvision 7 Knox Rapid Entry System: A Knox rapid entry key vauR shall be installed prior to final inspection Proof of purchase shall be submitted prior to final bwlding plan approval Contact the Fire Safety Division for specrfic details and ordering information Contact Bulding and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 for inspection S Construction Access: Fire District access, a minmum 26-feet in width and 14-feet, 6-inches minimum clear height shall be provided These minimum clearances shall be maintained free and clear of any obstructions at all times, in accordance wdh Fire Distract Standards Contact the Fire Safety Division (sos) an-2no 9 Site Directory: A bulding or site directory shall be provided, as noted below a Lighted directory within 20-feet of each primary entrance to the site The site dvectory shall be constructed, located, and installed in accordance with Fire Safety Division Standards Contact the Fire Safet Division at 909 477-2770 ~ ~C ~30~ 10 Fire Lanes: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Oxupancy, the fire lanes shall be installed in accordance with the approved fire lane plan The CC&R's or other approved documents shall contain an approved fire lane map and provisions that prohibit parking in the fire lanes The method of enforcement shall be documented The CC&R's shall also identify who is responsible for not less than annual inspection and maintenance of all regwred fve lanes Contact Budding and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 11 Address- Other Than Single-family: New buildings other than single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness When the bulding setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street an additional non-illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance Contact Budding and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713. 12 Multi-unit Complexes: In mutts-unit complexes approved address numbers, and/or building identrfication letters shall be provided on the front and back of all unds, sudes, or bwidings. The Fve District shall review and approve the numbering plan in coordination wdh the City of Rancho Cucamonga Contact Bwlding and Safety/Fve Construction Services (909) 477-2713. 13 High-pile Combustible Storage-Permit: The applicant is regwred to obtain a Fve D~stnct Permit for Storage of High-pile Combustible material Contact the Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770 14. High-pile Combustible Storage- Plans: The applicant shall submit plans for the storage arrangement to Fire Construction Services. The applicant shall submit detailed plans and a Commodity Analysis report to Fire Construction Services for approval If the occupancy classification for the building is designated as Group S, Division 2, commodilies stored shall be limited to light hazard classification only Contact Budding and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 15 Business Emergency/Contingency Plan: The applicant shall submit a Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for emergency release or threatened release of hazardous materials and wastes or provide a letter of exemption. Contact the County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials/Emergency Response and Enforcement Division at (909) 387-8400. 16 Submittal to the Fire District: Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy a copy of the County Fire Department approved Business Emergency/Contingency Plan -New Business (Hazardous Materials Release Response Plans and Inventory) shall be submitted to the Fire District In some cases additional information that is not in the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan may be regwred in order to support local fve prevention and emergency response programs Contact Fve Safety Division (909) 477-2770 17 Reqwred County Permits: The applicant shall be required to apply for one or more of the following Hazardous Materials Handler Permit, a Hazardous Waste Generator Permit, an Aboveground Storage Tank Permit, and/or an Underground Storage Tank Permit Contact the County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials Division/Fve Services Section at (909) 387-3080 18 Risk Management Plan: The applicant must demonstrate that the facility has met or is meeting all Risk Management Plan (RMP) requirements if regulated substances are to be handled at the facility Contact the County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials/Emergency Response and Enforcement Division at (909) 387-8400 19 Fire District Confidential Business Occupancy Information: The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" Form and submit to the Fire Safety Division This form provides contact information for Fire Distract use in the event of an emergency at the subject bulding or property Contact Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770 Fire Distract Preliminary Review Letter -Template SL 10/10/02 Revision C~ ~~ `~~ • T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Repoli DATE• May 14, 2003 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commisslon FROM• Brad Buller, Clty Planner BY. Warren Morellon, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16010 - RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION - The subdivision of 7.4 acres of land Into 5 parcels In the General Industrial District (Subarea 14), located at the southeast corner of 6th Street and the I-15 Freeway -APN 229-283-08, 10, and 11. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2002-00750 - RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION - The development of 5 Industrial buildings totaling 117,790 square feet on 7 4 acres of land In the General Industrial Dlstnct (Subarea 14), located at the southeast corner of 6th Street and the I-15 Freeway -APN• 229-283-08, 10, and 11. BACKGROUND The Item was originally scheduled for the December 11, 2002, Planning Commisslon meeting. At the request of the applicant, the Item was continued flue times (December 11, 2002 and January 8, February 26, March 26, and April 23, 2003), In order to address the limits of off-site public Improvements associated with the project Based on numerous discussions with the City without resolve, the appllcant has requested no more continuances of the protect and would like the Item heard on May 14, 2003 Attached are copies of the Planning Commisslon staff reports for your reference (Exhibits "B" - "F") On May 6, 2003, staff received a letter from the appllcant outlining concerns with conditions of approval for the off-site improvements Staff was unable to generate a written response addressing the applicant's concerns prior to the preparation of this agenda Consequently, staff will be prepared to respond to the issues at the Planning Commission meeting. ITEMS B,D PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM16010/DRC2002-00750 - RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION May 14, 2003 Page 2 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16010 and Development Revew DRC2002-00750 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions and issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB•WM:Is Attachments• Exhibit "A" -Applicant's Letter Outlining Issues dated May 6, 2003 Exhibit "B" - Planning Commission Staff Report dated Apnl 23, 2003 Exhibit "C" - Planning Commission Staff Report dated March 26 2003 Exhibit °D" - Planning Commission Staff Report dated February 26, 2003 Exhibit "E" - Planning Commission Staff Report dated January 8, 2003 Exhibit °F" - Planning Commission Staff Report dated December 11, 2002 Draft Resol ution of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16010 Draft Resol ution of Approval for Development Review DRC2002-00750 ~, o a 6ent'By: Planning Research Int'1.; 714 505 1870; May-6-D3 7:08PM; Pege 2/4 ~~ Development Corporation May 6, 2003 Mr. harry McNeil C"halrnim+ PLANNING CQMMISSION c!o Mr Brad Huller PlannM8lhrecror CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10500 Civic Centnr Drivn Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 -~~~- (909)477-2847 Re: DRC2002-110750 & 00751 / SUBTpM-16009 & 16010 Applications For Two industrial Park Projects, "TF!<<'!nevards East" and "The Vlnevar'ds West+f+ Oa The Eut and West Sida of I-l5 On The South Side of 6 Street- Dear Chairman McNeil• The Planning Commission has previously contimred the two appl~catrons retcrcnced above on five occasions pursuant to nw requests due to issues we felt were detrimcmal to our projects We would like to express cwr apprcuaUOn and thanks to the commission for allowing us irme to try and mrtigatc those issues, though our efforts have been flttilc. Our proJed on the West aide oft-15 is a very small fow building, 54,662 sq ft industrial pmlect. II encompasses approximately 3.5 acres, with the follovnng• 1 ls~oceptionally shallow depths adjacent to the freeway 2 , Two corners 3. A street realignment on Charles Smith Ave. 4. lie-surfacing and futishing of 6°' St (including CalTntns approved work under the freeway overpass) 5 Requir~l undo-grounding of utilities along 6a' St and Charles Smith Ave., and 6 An irrlieu fee for landscaping of the iteeway berm adjacent tit thn ptojex:t. All of the above combined with the normal impact fees of schools, trxnsportalion devclopmem, CCWD and various hook mp to develoL onl what the zoning allows in the best smalu mJusttialobu IdinB n though we aro try' $ P Y market in twerrty-five years. Our wuclusion rs that this small protect dots not have the horsepower to cconomiwlly pay fix all of the Cees and offstte work that have bean conditioned to the project The pnmary reason i+ that the shallow depths of the project don't allow for enough building area with respect to the street and Lt~ P(1 Rnz'i724 • Tusun, ('A 927N1.3724 • USA • reL (714) $OS-1575 • fez C114).5n5-Ib7U Exhibit "A" May-8-03 7:07PM; Pege 3/4 Sent sy: Planning Research Int 1.; 714 505 1870; freeway frontagev, e+pecially due to the fact that there are two streets that front the project. Our East • aide project, with almost double the-depths,-and some of the same fees aad_off'site costs, is _ _ - _ economically viable due to the greater acotromiar of scale. We directly asked oily staff for relief on three itemv as follows I Waive the condition for providing fot landscaping of the freeway berms on both sides of I-15 adjacent to our properties. 'The savings on the East side would be applied to theliWes ~ ~ only This cost seems so out of proportion m the size of our projects and their capab~ ~d Pay it, but to also compete in theme s'~ kO~56~~ p clWuilding sq ft Both of these cents par sq.R. of building area oriionate and unfair are axces.~ive costs to these projects. Furthermore, they berm bydadjacent properties, the city In approving the legislation for landscaping the freeway did not take into account the size of adjacent properties. Consequently, a parcel of 10 or 20 acres with the same freeway frorrtaBe as 3 or 4 acres pays the same amount. No attempt to form asaessmem districts whero very small properties were grouped was wnsidered 2 Waive lire condition of improving 6'" St. on both sides of the I-15 &ecway, including the CaPI'rana right-of--way under the freeway (which ie a reimbursement), and the Cal Trani enc;macltment permit condition (the East savings would be applied to the West side projeci~ This had bean the int~t of Joe O'Neil before fiscal issues apparently overtook things, and was bawd upon the i;onoupt that Ga' St. was regional and that Were might be other ways to fund this small stretch of road 3, Waive the in-lieu utihty under-grounding fee for 6's street on the West side only (them era no East aide under-grounding requiremetiis). We unden;tand and agree that we shall pay for and underground the utilities along (:banes Smith Ave at an estimated cost of $53,000 (approx. 51.00 per bldg. Sq R City stab's response to the above items was that all three are set forth in ordinances or resolutions, and ~~hu eLO go ahead and Otbtainmentitlam~mts~end th a waist upo 5ve yreara to scetwh t happens to the market. Consequently, we are proceeding with the following requests to the Planning Commission a That the East grid West projects bath be approved subject to the currant existing cnndrtions, and subject to Item "c" below, b) That the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council that the city undertake a tatiidy to determine if the Planning Commission and/or the City Council should have~ideis ~ P ojects mitigating disproportionate impacts by limiting those impacts on small prop ~ they apply to where ordinances and/or resolutions create such impacts, and most aspeciauy freeway berm landscaping, street and other offsite work rtxluirements, transportation development fees, and drainage fxs, and • 0 i + Me 8-03 7:07PM; Pege 414 Sent By: Planning flesearch Int'1.; 714 505 1870; Y' That any modifications to an ordinanms and/or resoluuons based upon the above c) Y _ _ _ --~-=o_.~.Anti....-:ara:rrt,-^4'~e-fetrn86tFYelY apPi~ 4n clot ~jeCtS (}ur wish is that we have brought to the city's attention certain lssucs that may aced to be looked into City requaements and waditions that work nn a level field for 8,10, 20 and 40 acre developments may be a minefield for the 1 l0 5 acro projects We arc only asking that them be some discretionary ability by the Planning Commission or City Council when a situation bex:umas egregious for the small project. vary truly yours ~~~ Richard K. Wagnere~ cc Warren Morehoa Connie Wagner Davidson p tQ Staff Report DATE: April 23, 2003 TO. Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, City Planner BY• Warren Morelion, Assistant Planner SUBJECT. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16010 - RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION -The subdivision of 7.4 acres of land into 5 parcels in the General Industrial District (Subarea 14), located at the southeast corner of 6th Street and the I-15 Freeway - APN. 229-283-08, 10, and 11 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2002-00750 - RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION -The development of 5 industrial buildings totaling 117,790 square feet on 7 4 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 14), located at the southeast corner of 6th Street and the I-15 Freeway - APN• 229-283-08, 10, and 11 BACKGROUND The item was originally scheduled for the December 11, 2002, Planning Commission meeting. At the request of the applicant, the item was continued four times (December 11, 2002, January 8, 2003, February 26, 2003, and March 26, 2003) until April 23, 2003, in order to address the limits of off-site public improvements associated with the project The applicant has submitted another letter requesting the item be continued again to the May 14, 2003, meeting because he is still in negotiations with the Engineering Diwsion to resolve outstanding issues (Exhibit "A") RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission continue Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16010 and Development Review DRC2002-00750 to May 14, 2003 Respectful ubmitted, Brad Bu r City Planner BB WM/Is Attachments Exhibit "A" - Letter dated April 15, 2003, requesting a fifth continuance to May 14, 2003 ~1V Exhibit "B" Sent By: Planning Research Int ~ 714 505 1670; Apr-1 ~ 4:34PM; Page 2/2 April I5, 2003 VIA FACSINUI.C (909)477-2847 • Development Mr Bmd Buller I'larning !)rrecfrrr CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10.500 Civic ('.solar Drivc Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: DRC2002-00750 dic 00751 / SUBTPM-16009 & iG0i0 Applications For'Iwo industrial Park Projects, "The Vineyards East" and "'1~ c Vine,~a esl", On 'fhc East and West Sides of I-15 On The South Side of 6 Strcet. Dear Brad' Pursuant to ow discussion yesterday, please contim;c the above referenced apphcatrons unpl the May 14, 2W3 Planning Commission meeting. Please let me know if you have any questions Thank you for your help to this matter Ve truly yours, `~~~~ 4/ Rrcherd K Wagner ce• Warren Mnrelion Connie Wagner Davidcnn Carol Plowman ~Xn ~~ U ~J Y~~-3~~ 3 gl~ T PO. Box 3724 • 't actin, CA 92781-3774 • i1SA ml. (714) 505-I S75 • fax (714) 505.16'0 T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO C U C A M O N C A Staff Report DATE: March 26, 2003 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commisslon FROM Brad Buller, Clty Planner BY• Warren Morellon, Assistant Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16010 - RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION -The subdivision of 7 4 acres of land Into 5 parcels In the General Industrial District (Subarea 14), located at the southeast corner of 6th Street and the I-15 Freeway - APN 229-283-08, 10, and 11 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2002-00750 - RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION -The development of 5 Industnal buildings totaling 117,790 square feet on 7.4 acres of land in the General Industnal Dlstnct (Subarea 14), located at the southeast corner of 6th Street and the I-15 Freeway - APN 229-283-08, 10, and 11. BACKGROUND The Item was originally scheduled for the December 11, 2002, Planning Commisslon meeting At the request of the applicant, the Item was continued three times (December 11, 2002, January 8, 2003, and February 26, 2003) until March 26, 2003, in order to address the limits of off-site public improvements associated with the protect At the time this report was written, the applicant was still in negotiations with the Engineering Division to resolve outstanding issues. Attached for reference Is the February 26, 2003, staff report (Exhibit "B") RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16010 and Development Review DRC2002-00750 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions and Issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration Br Buller City Planner Attachments Exhibit "A" - Letter dated February 26, 2003, requesting a third continuance to March 26, 2003 Exhibit "B" - Planning Commisslon Staff Report dated February 26, 2003 Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16010 Draft Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2002-00750 ~~ Exhibit "C" • • Feb 26 03 04:47p L~k Huquet 9011924 p•2 ~ Charles Joseph Associates pUB~ICJPRNATE SECTOR MANAGEMENT SERVICES February 26, 2003 grad Buller, City Planner Oily of Random Cucamonga P. O. Box 807 Random Cucamonga, CA 91729-0807 Re: Request for Continuance to NAarch 26, 2003 - RtCW Development Corporation - DRC2002-00750 and DRC2002-00751, SUBTPM1ti009 and SUt3TPM18010 Dear Brad This is as a follow-up to our discussions with you, our dient and various City stag concealing the nfererrced matter. Following our last corrticoncemin9 va cus office has been meeting with City and Traffic Engineering Project improvement scope issues. While we have been successful w"rth addressing some concerns in this regard. our diem Is currently assessing the finanaal impacts assoda~~ recent onve ificatior~ i frastrur~llre costis• conditions and how they Based upon the foregoing. we are requesting a continuance of the referenced Project hearing items to March 26, 2003, which will allow our diem to complete his finandal impact assessment activity. We have been working m try to establish a reasonable nexus of imprpvertrent requirements proportionate to the scale and scope of the Projects contemplated by our dierrt. lire continuing professional courtesy extended by the City in this regard is most appreciated bstryouceld di hen wee ~ ~ ~ orcerleed of additional enfomlation or opporhlnity you assistance with this matter. S(incere~ly, ~X/ 1 Charles J. Raquel Charles Joseph Associates Cc: Richard Wagner, RKW Development Jce O'Neil, City Engineer Jon Gillespie, City Traffic Engineer • ofLcc909~48t.-£t22 BW~zal.ltf72 Ifua19~48t•182a Cuy Cf:nocr ~ IIXiS] lfootb+0 Ahnl., Swtc 395 ~ Rdcho (.oam,mpit, , CA ~ 917:10 A f.A1JYl)RNIA f'f>RM)RA7'I<)N T H E RANCHO I T Y O F UCAMONGA Staff Report DATE February 26, 2003 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, Clty Planner BY Warren Morellon, Assistant Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16010 - RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION -The subdivision of 7 4 acres of land Into 5 parcels In the General Industrial Dlstnct (Subarea 14), located at the southeast comer of 6th Street and the I-15 Freeway - APN 229-283-08, 10, and 11 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2002-00750 - RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION -The development of five industrial buildings totaling 117,790 square feet on 7 4 acres of land In the General Industrial Dlstnct (Subarea 14), located at the southeast corner of 6th Street and the I-15 Freeway -APN 229-283-08, 10, and 11 BACKGROUND The Item was originally scheduled for the December 11, 2002, Planning Commisslon meeting At the request of the applicant, the Item was continued until January 8, 2003, In order to address the limits of off-site public improvements associated with the protect The item was continued again at the request of the applicant until February 26, 2003, to finish addressing the issues At the time this report was written, the applicant was still In negotiations with the Engineering Division to resolve the issues Attached is the December 11, 2002, staff report for your reference CORRESPONDENCE On December 17, 2002, the Planning Division received a letter from the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) requesting a written response to air quality comments prior to certification of the Vineyards West and Vineyards East Final Negative Declarations The concern expressed by SCAQMD is that the protects are being treated separately, when It fact they are two phases of the same protect, and construction of the protects could overlap, creating adverse environmental impacts Analysis of environmental documentation shows that construction and operations of both protects together is below SCAQMD thresholds with the exception of painting activities Conditions of Approval have been added to the projects to reduce the adverse impacts of painting to less than significant If the protects are developed concurrently On January Transportatio encroachment 6, 2003, the Planning Division received a letter from the Department of n Informing staff that the appllcant/developer will be required to get a Caltrans permit prior to Exhibit "D" development of each protect site A Condition of Approval has ~,D \o • PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM16010/DRC2002-00750 - RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION February 26, 2003 Page 2 been added to the protects requiring verification of an encroachment permit prior to issuance of budding permits RECOMMENDATION. Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16010 and Development Review DRC2002-00750 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions and issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration Brad Buller City Planner BB WM\Is Attachments Exhibit "A" Exhibit "B" Exhibit "C" Exhibit "D" Exhibit "E" Letter dated January 8, 2003, requesting a second continuance to February 26, 2003 South Coast Air Quality Management Distract Comment Letter dated December 11, 2002 Department of Transportation Comment Letter dated December 31, 2002 Air Quality Analysis January S, 2003, and December 11, 2002, Staff Reports/Irntial Study Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16010 Draft Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2002-00750 ~~ ~~ Jan Oa 03 05:20p C pk Huquet 80F 11824 Charles Jose.~h Associates PUBl,1GPRNATE SECTOR MANAGEMENT SgtVICES January 8, 2003 Brad Buller, City Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-OS07 Re: Request for Continuance to February 26, 2003 - RK1N Development Corporation - DRC2002-00750 and DRC2002-00751, SUBTPM7B009 and SUBTPM16010 Dear Brad: This is as a folbvwup m discussions with our Giant and various City staff conoeming the referenced matter. Following our last continuance request, our office has Dean meeting with City and Traffic Engineering concerning various project improvement scope issues IlVhile we have been suocesstuing out the addressing a number of concerns in this regard, we are «rrrentiy remaining deta7s with City Engineering for modification of the recommended conditions in order fA allow our Giant to be able m move forward with these small industrial protects. Based upon an the foregoing, we are requesting a txntinuanoe of the referenced project hearing items to February 28.2003, which will allow us m oonrplete our activity with tits respective parties of interest We are txntinuing to work tD be able to establish a reasonable nexus of Improvementcerequi l ~ ~ d'~nt proportionate to the scale and scope of the projects ntenp The continuing professional courtesy extended by the City in this regard is most appreciated by our Giant Please feel free 1b centea me at your earliest opportunity should you have any questions or need of additional information or assistance with this matter. Sincerely, Charles J. Buquet Charles Joseph Associates Ca Richard Wagner, RKW Development Joe O'Neil, City F~gineer Jon Gillespie, City Traffic Engineer UI6cc 707.481.1822 800.240.1872 Itatc 70'1.481.1821 -- (:wort • IOG81 Itootln'8 blvd. Suite 375 • Rands C.ucanwofi. C.A • 91730 A <.NAIKMNIA (X (IIPf)M'n()N Exhibit "A" .~/.~%-a. ~~ D ~a p.2 r 1 L...,J r~ U r~ ~J South Coast ~ ~~ Air Quality Management District 21865 E. Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4182 ' ~ ' (909) 396-2000 • www.agmd.gov C ''~ ^,. • ~. ~~, OFC 1 CyocUCgMa ~~~ . ~~ >>_~ ^' N~ FAXED: DECEMBER 11, 2002 December 11, 2002 Warren Morelion City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Dear Mr. Morelion: Negative Declarations (NDsI for The Vineyards West and The Vineyards East - Rancho Cucamonga The South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD) appreciates the opportunity to comment on the above-mentioned documents. The following comments are meant as guidance for the Lead Agency and should be incorporated in the Final Negative Declaration. Please provide the AQMD with written responses to all comments contained herein prior to the certification of the Final Negative Declaration. The AQMD would be happy to wotlc with the Lead Agency to address these issues and any other questions that may arise. Please contact Charles Blankson, Ph.D., Transportation Specialist - CEQA Section, at (909) 396-3304 if you have any questions regarding these comments. Sincerely Attachment SS: CB SBC021120-03 Control Number Exhibit '8" ~~-~~/e~ s-~ s- Steve Smith, Ph.D. Program Supervisor, CEQA Section Planning, Rule Development & Area Sources ~ t 0 \3 Warren Morelion • -2- .December 11, 2002 Negative Declaration (ND) for The Vineyards West and The Vineyards East - • Rancho Cucamonga One Sin¢le Project: The AQMD has reviewed the negative declarations for the Vineyards East and West Projects and is unclear why the lead agency has prepared two separate CEQA documents for what appears to be a single protect. The project proponent is the same individual for both proposed projects. The proposed projects are directly across the street from one another, and they both involve the subdivision of former agricultural land and the construction of industrial bu>idings. Further, on page 4 of Part 1 of the Initial Study for the Vineyards East project negative declaration it is stated, "The Vineyards East will be Phase II (The Vineyards West is Phase I)." This statement explicitly indicates that the two projects are related. It is not clear from the project whether construction phases overlap, but the project operation phases certainly overlap. It is, therefore, recommended that the lead agency recirculate a CEQA document that analyzes project-specific impacts from both components of the proposed project 2. Overall Project Imaacts: By treating the two phases of the proposed project as separate projects, the net effect is to reduce impacts to less than significant levels. For example, if construction for each phase of the proposed project overlaps, then VOC (ROG) emissions would exceed the daily VOC significance threshold. Similarly, since operation impacts from the two phases would clearly overlap, NOx emissions for both phases would exceed the daily NOx significance threshold. Unless the air quality • impacts are mitigated to less than the significance thresholds identified in the draft negative declarations, the proposed project does not qualify for a negative declaration. 3. Diesel Truck Emissions: At buildout the complete project covering 12.26 acres will be home to nine industrial buildings totaling 172,452 square feet. These industrial buildings will attract substantial truck traffic. CARB has designated diesel particulates as a carcinogen. Since the lead agency did not include the URBEMIS 2001 printout, it is difficult to determine how much of the operational PM~o emissions are generated by heavy-duty truck traps. Depending on the volume of truck traffic from the proposed project, the AQMD recommends that the lead agency perform an air toxics health risk analysis of the diesel truck emissions. The AQMD has prepared intenm guidance for preparing such an analysis, which is available upon request. 4 Miti¢ation Measures: Since the au• basin is in non-attainment for both the federal and state ozone, carbon monoxide and particulate matter (PM~o) standards, it is important that the lead agency ensure the implementation of any measures which would help reduce any of these criteria pollutants. The following measures are recommended for the lead agency to consider where applicable or feasible: Maintain equipment and vehicle engines in good condition and in proper tune as per manufacturers' specifications. Require the use of alternative clean fuel such as compressed natural gas-powered . equipment instead of diesel-powered engines, or if diesel equipment has to be ~~D\~ • - Warren Morelion • -3- .December 11, 2002 used, use particulate filters and low sulfur diesel as defined in AQMD Rule 431.2, i.e, v~th less than 15 ppm sulfur content. Trucks hauling dirt, sand, gravel or soil are to be covered or should maintain at least two feet of freeboazd in accordance with Section 23114 of the California Vehicle Code. Pave pazkmg areas and construction access roads to the main roads to avoid dirt being carried on to the roadway. Use alternative-fueled yard tractors. Restrict idling emissions by using auxiliary power units and electrification. • Enforce truck parking restrictions. • Restrict truck traffic on some mutes. • Provide a minimum of 300-meter buffer zone between truck traffic and sensitive receptors. Redirect truck mute to avoid residential areas or schools. Improve traffic flow through signal synchronization. • Provide electrical sources for service equipment and docking of trucks. • Use light-colored roof materials to deflect heat. Install solar panels on roof to supply electricity for air conditioning. • Use double-paned windows to reduce thermal loss. Install central water heating systems to reduce energy consumption, and • Install energy-efficient appliances to reduce energy consumption. 5. Editorial Comment: The lead agency should be aware that the negative declaration provided to the AQMD for the Vineyards West project did not include pages 2, 4, 6 and 7 of Part I of the Initial Study. gtp ~s IlreUSINESS TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY GRAY DAMS, Gwemor STATE OF cAUr-oRN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 8 464 W Fourth Street. 6° Floor MS 728 San Bemardlno, CA 92401-1400 PHONE (909) 383.6327 FAX (909) 383-6890 December 31, 2002 08-SBd-15-PM 3.576 Mr. Warren Morelion Planning Division City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Mr. Morehon, ,:-fC Ctlrn,,,y,,,,a JAN p g 2003 Preliminary Site Plan for DRC2002-00750. SUBTMP 16010. RKW Development Comoration. Applicant We have received the preliminary site plans for the above project. This project proposes to subdivide a 7.4-acre vacant lot mto five parcels and the development of five industrial buildings totaling 117,900 square feet, located at the southeast comer of 6`~ Street and the Interstatel5 (I-15) Freeway in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. After further evaluation of the preliminary site plans, we found that the proposed off-site improvements do encroach onto the existing I-15 Right-of--Way. Issuance of a Caltrars encroachment permit will be required. All work Performed wrthm State nght-of--way shall be consistent with applicable design critena per State Highway Design and Traffic Manuals, and relevant construction policies and practices. Review and approval of construction plans within the State right-of--way by Caltrans will be necessary prior to permit issuance. Information regarding permit application and submittal regwrements may be obtained at: Office of Permits California Department of Transportation 464 West Fourth Street, 6~' Floor, MS 619 San Bemardmo, CA 92401-1400 (909)383-4536 If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Mr. Kee T. Oot at (909) 383-4149 for assistance. Sincerely, (C~~~~ . LINDA GRIMES, Chief Office of Forecashng/IGR-CEQA Review Transportation Plamm~g Divrsion cc. F. Hazder, Encroachment Permrts-SBd. Co. ~ ` ~ `~ Exhibit "C" ~/~~~~-2 LILBURN CORPORATION . ~ ~ Date/Tlme: //(% To: ~~,f'I'Cn cc: & Enaironmental Sernices Fax: ~77.Z84'7 Phone: Fax: Phone: From: ~ ~ ~~ Pages• ~ Including Cover Sheet s~bje~t: ~ I w ,FpY~%7_CDZ'oa?50 f 75/ ~~J~ -Original will not follow. ,[Original will follow by: regt~ar mai / ovemigM mei / caner / Message: 1~1a~- ~4dd ed u.p ~o-H1 ~~'J ec¢s - ram ac ~ n~,,Sdel ' usl'~ Q -I-o•Fa,( o~ 17Z~45a ~ o-~ use ~t o-use artc/ ~ad~ n /~i~C ~tcp o -~ II.46 ~cres• ~ i' , w i~ ~ ,.~ ~-y •-1'he c)cce~~ o-F ~tlnh~ ctC~-ti/i-I-i~,C~~ee naks r.~c2s bclai.~ ~Q-MD -I-11resh.ol~s_ evLrr d u.n~ a-rDn~. ~~~ ~, ~ ~~ Exhibit "p" ° ~ _ _ ,.. nn.no nrv oM_tolo . Ae.. Of10Jt0l1_1 RflQ .Page : 1 URBEMIS 2001 For Windows 6.2.2 File Name: <Not Saved> Project Name: cation: L Warren South Coast Air Basin (Los Angeles area) o Project SUMMARY REPORT (Pounds/Day - Summer) CONSTRUCTION EMISSION ESTIMATBS ROG NOx CO PM10 S02 TOTALS(lbs/day,iynmitigated) 81.06 52.12 1.21 24.80 5.06 TOTALS (lbs/day, mitigated) 77.05 49.56 1.21 10.46 4.81 AREA SOURCB BMISSION ESTZMATBS PM10 502 ROG NOx CO TOTALS(lbe/day unmitigated) 0.18 1.16 1.15 0.00 0.00 TOTALS (lbs/day, mitigated) 0.18 1.16 1.14 0.00 0.00 OPERATIONAL (VSHICi,E) EMISSION BSTIMATES ROG NOx CO PM10 S02 TOTALS (ppd, unmitigated) 13.88 32.32 145.45 6.54 0.34 TOTALS (ppd, mitigated) 12.97 29.63 133.33 6.00 0.31 • g, D \~b Page: 2' IIRBEMZS 2001 For Windows 6.2.2 ~e Name: <NOt Saved> Project Name: Warren Project Location: South Coast Air Basin (Los Angeles area) DETAIL REPORT (Pounds/Day - Winter) Total Land IIae Area to be Developed (Estimated): a acres Retail/Office/Institutional Square Footage: 172452 Single Family IInits: 0 Multi-family Daite: 0 CONSTRIICTZON EMISSION ESTIMATES Source ROG NOx CO PM10 SO2 Demolition - - - 0.00 - Site Grading 2.73 39.90 - 23.97 4.64 Coast. Worker Trips 0.45 0.64 1.21 0.12 - Statioaary Equip 0.34 0.27 - 0.02 0.00 Mobile 8quip. - Gae 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 Mobile Equip. - Diesel 1.13 11.30 - 0.69 0.42 Architectural Coalinga 75.96 - - - - Asphalt Offgaesing 0.45 - - - - TOTALS(lbs/day,unmitigated) 81.06 52.12 1.21 24.80 5.06 CONSTRIICTION EMISSION ESTZMATES Source ROG NOx CO PM10 SO2 Demolition - - - 0.00 - ite Grading 2.60 37.91 - 9.67 4.40 net. Workez Tripe ~ 0.45 0.64 1.21 0.12 ationary 8quip 0.34 0.27 - 0.02 0.00 Mobile Equip. - Gae 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 Mobile 8quip. - Diesel 1.07 10.74 - 0.66 0.40 Architectural Coatings 72.16 - - - - Asphalt Offgaesing 0.43 - - - - TOTALS (lbs/day, mitigated) 77.05 49.56 1.21 10.46 4.81 Construction-Related Mitigation Measures Soil Erosion Measures: Water Exposed Surfaces 2x Per Day Percent Reduction(ROG Ot NOx Ot CO 0~ PM10 68$ SO2 0$) Properly Maintain Equipment Percent Reduction(ROG St NOx 53 CO St PM10 St SO2 5~) Implement Water/Paved Road Measures: Water All Haul Ronde 2x Per Day Percent Reduction(ROG Ot NOx 0~ CO Ot PM10 33 SO2 08') Reduce Speeds on IInpaved Roads to 15 mph or less Percent Reduction(ROG Of NOx Ot CO Ot PM10 706 SO2 0~) Mobile Equipment: Properly Maintain Equipment Percent Reduction(ROG St NOx St CO SE PM10 5~ SO2 5$) Architectural Coatings: Use Low VOC Coatings Percent Reduction(ROG 5~ NOx 0$ CO 08 PM10 0~ SO2 0$) Asphalt Paving: IIae Low VOC Asphalt Percent Reduction(ROG St NOx 03 CO Ot PM10 0~ SO2 0~) 4~ , o \°~ Page: 3 AREA SOURCE EMISSION ESTIMATES (Winter Pounds per Day, Unmitigated) Source ROG NOx CO PM10 SO2 Natural Gae 0.08 1.15 0.96 0.00 • - Wood Stoves 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fireplaces 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Landscaping - No winter emieaions Consumer Prdcts TOTALS(lba/day,unmitigated) 0.00 0.08 - 1.15 - 0.46 - 0.00 - 0.00 AREA SOURCE EMISSION ESTIMATES Source ROG NOx CO PM10 SO2 Natural Gas 0.08 1.15 0.46 0.00 - Wood Stoves 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fireplaces 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Landscaping - No winter emissions Consumer Prdcts TOTALS (lba/day, mitigated) 0.00 0.08 - 1.15 - 0.46 - 0.00 - 0.00 Area Source Mitigation Measures Central Water Heater: Cmrcl Space Heat. Percent Reduction(ROG 0.5~ NOx O.5t CO 0.5~ PM10 O.5R SO2 0.5$) C_~ g, o ao Page : 4' UNMITIGATED OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS ROG NOx CO PM10 SO2 Warehouse 13.03 42.95 152.32 6.54 0.33 TOTAL EMISSIONS (lbs/day) 13.03 42.95 152.32 6.54 0.33 Includes correction for passby trips. Does not include double counting adjustment for internal tripe. OPERATIONAL (Vehicle) EMISSION ESTIMATES Analysis Year: 2003 Temperature (F): 50 Season: Winter EMFAC Version: EMFAC2001 (10/2001) Summary of Land IIsea: IInit Type Trip Rate Size Tot al Tripe Warehouse 5.71 tripe / 1000 eq. ft. 172.45 984.70 Vehicle Assumptions: Fleet Mix: Vehicle Type Percent Type Non-Catal yst Catalyst Diesel ht Auto 47.70 4.70 94.50 0.80 ~ht Truck c 3,750 lba 9.30 11.00 88.90 0.10 ght Truck 3,751- 5,750 3.20 1.80 97.60 0.60 Med Truck 5,751- 8,500 5.60 12.50 79.20 8.30 Lite-Heavy 8,501-10,000 6.90 18.20 72.70 9.10 Lite-Heavy 10,001-14,000 7.20 0.00 66.70 33.30 60 63 Med-Heavy 14,001-33,000 12.00 9.10 27.30 . 00 100 Heavy-Heavy 33,001-60,000 7.90 0.00 0.00 00 0 . 100.00 Line Haul > 60,000 lbs 0.00 0.00 . 00 0 100.00 Urban Bue 0.00 0 20 0.00 90.90 . 9.10 0.00 Motorcycle . 0 00 0.00 0.00 100.00 School Bua . 0 00 0.00 100.00 0.00 Motor Home . Travel Conditions Residential Commercial Home- Home- Home - work Shop Othe r Commute Non-Work Customer Urban Trip Length (miles) 11.5 4.9 6.0 10.3 5.5 5.5 Rural Trip Length (miles) 11.5 4.9 6.0 10.3 5.5 5.5 Trip Speeds (mph) 35.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 ~ of Trips - Residential 20.0 37.0 43.0 ~ of Tripe - Commercial (by land use) 2 0 1.0 97.0 Warehouse Q,~D a~ Page: 5 MITIGATED OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS ROG NOx CO PM10 S02 Warehouse 11.95 39.37 139.63 6.00 0.30 TOTAL EMISSIONS (lbs/day) 11.95 39.37 139.63 6.00 0 30 OPERATIONAL (Vehicle) EMISSION ESTIMATES Analysis Year: 2003 Temperature (F): 50 Season: Winter EMFAC Version: EMFAC2001 (10/2001) Summary of Land Uses: Unit Type Trip Rate Size Total Trips Warehouse 5.71 trips / 1000 sq. ft. 172.45 984.70 Vehicle Assumptions: Fleet Mix: Vehicle Type Percent Type Non-Catalyst Catalyst Diesel Light Auto 47.70 4.70 94.50 0.80 Light Truck < 3,750 lbs 9.30 11.00 88.90 0.10 Light Truck 3,751- 5,750 3.20 1.80 97 60 0.60 Med Truck 5,751- 8,500 5.60 12.50 79.20 8.30 10 9 Lite-Heavy 8,501-10,000 6.90 18.20 72.70 . 30 33 Lite-Heavy 10,001-14,000 7.20 0.00 66.70 . 60 63 Med-Heavy 14,001-33,000 12.00 9.10 27.30 . 00 100 Heavy-Heavy 33,001-60,000 7.90 0.00 0.00 00 0 . 00 100 Line Haul > 60,000 lbs 0.00 0.00 . 00 0 . 00 100 Urban Bus 0.00 0.00 . 10 9 . 0.00 Motorcycle 0.20 90.90 . 00 0 100.00 School Bus 0.00 0 00 0.00 0.00 . 100.00 0.00 Motor Home . Travel Conditions Resident ial Commercial Home- Home- Home- Work Shop Other Commute Non-Work Customer Urban Trip Length (miles) 11.5 4.9 6.0 10.3 5.5 5.5 Rural Trip Length (miles) 11.5 4.9 6.0 10.3 5.5 40 0 5.5 40 0 Trip Speeds (mph) 35.0 40.0 40 0 . 40.0 . ~ of Trips - Residential 20.0 37.0 43.0 ~ of Trips - Commercial (by land use) 0 0 1 97 0 Warehouse 2 . . f 1 g , o as Page: 6 ~IRONMENTAL FACTORS APPLICABLE TO THE PROJECT Pedestrian Environment 1 0 Side Walks/Paths: Few Destinations Covered 1.0 Street Trees Provide Shade: Moderate Coverage y•p Pedestrian Circulation Access: Some Destinations 3.0 Visually Interesting Uses Moderate Number and Variety 0.5 Street System Enhances Safety: Few Streets 0 5 Pedestrian Safety from Crime: Some Degree of Safety 1.0 Visually Interesting Walking Routea: Moderate Level 9,p <- Pedestrian Environmental Credit 9 0 /19 0.5 <- Pedestrian Effectiveness Factor Transit Service 20.0 Transit Service: 15-30 Minute Bus within 1/4 Mile 20.0 <- Transit Effectiveness Credit 9.0 <- Pedestrian Factor y9 0 <-Total 29.0 /110 0.3 <-Transit Effectiveness Factor Bicycle Environment 5.0 Interconnected Bikeways: High Coverage ~p Bike Routes Provide Paved Shoulders: Most Mal or Destinations p Safe Vehicle Speed Limits. Most Malor Destinations p Safe School Routes. No Schools 3.0 Uses w/in Cycling Distance• Large Number and Variety 1.0 Bike Parking Ordinance: Requires Unprotected Sike Racks 14.0 <- Bike Environmental Credit 14.0 /20 = 0 7 <- Bike Effectiveness Factor C~ g , 0 a3 .Page • '1 .MITIGATION MEASURES SELECTED FOR THIS PROJECT (All mitigation measures are printed, even if • the selected land uses do not constitute a mixed use.) Transit Infrastructure Measures ~ Trips Reduced Measure Credit for Existing or Planned Community Transit Service 15.0 15 0 <- Totals Pedestrian Enhancing Infrastructure Measures (Residential) ~ Trips Reduced Measure Z,p Credit for Surrounding Pedestrian Environment z,0 <- Totals Pedestrian Enhancing Infrastructure Measures (Non-Residential) $ Trips Reduced Measure Credit for Surrounding Pedestrian Environment Z,0 2.0 <- Totals Bicycle Enhancing Infratructure Measures (Residential) ~ Trips Reduced Measure Credit for Surrounding Bicycle Environment ~,0 7.0 <- Totals Bike Enhancing Infrastructure Measures (Non-Residential) & Trips Reduced Measure • 5.0 Credit for Surrounding Area Bike Environment 5.0 <- Totals Operational Measures (Applying to Commute Trips) t Tripe Reduced Measure 0.0 <- Totala Operational Measures (Applying to Employee Non-Commute Tripe) ~ Trips Reduced Measure 0.0 <- Totals Operational Measures (Applying to Customer Trips) ~ Trips Reduced Measure 0 0 <- Totals Measures Reducing VMT (Non-Residential) VMT Reduced Measure 0.0 Park and Ride Lots 0.0 <- Totals Measures Reducing VMT (Residential) VMT Reduced - Measure 0.0 <- Totals • b, D a~ Page: 8 wit vel Mode Pedestrian Transit Bicycle Totals Travel Mode Pedestrian Transit Bicycle Other Totals Total Percentage Trip h Environmental Factors and Home-Work Trips Home-Shop 0.10 3.95 4.90 0.00 Reduction Mitigation Measures Trips Home-Other Trips 0 42 0 42 0 87 1.07 4.90 0.00 Work Trips Employee Trips 0.10 0.95 3.95 0.08 3.50 3.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Customer 4.90 0.00 Trips 0.95 3 95 3.50 0.00 0.00 $, o as Page: 9 Changes made to the default values for Construction The demolition option switch changed from on to off. The construction year changed from 2002 to 2003. The length of construction period changed from 250 to 150 The site grading max daily acreage estimate changed from to 2.0. The site grading annual days earth moving changed from 250 to 6. The site grading scraper total vehicles changed from to 1. The site grading roller total vehicles changed from to 1. The site grading roller hours/day changed from 8 to 4. The site grading motor grader total vehicles changed from to 1. The worker average trip length changed from 10 to 50. The worker construction year changed from 2002 to 2003. The asphalt acres to be paved changed from 1 to 6. The asphalt total days of paving changed from 10 to 35. The mobile diesel fork lift 175 HP total vehicles changed from to 1. The mobile diesel fork lift 175 HP hours/day changed from 8 to 4. The mobile diesel tracked loader total vehicles changed from to 1. The mobile diesel tracked loader hours/day changed from 8 to 2. The mobile diesel roller total vehicles changed from to 1. The mobile diesel roller hours/day changed from 8 to 4. The coatings nonresidential conversion factor changed from 2.0 to 1.5. The coatings number of days of painting changed from 20 to 60. Mitigation measure Soil Erosion Measures: Watez Exposed Surfaces 2x Per Day:0 has been changed from off to on. Mitigation measure Properly Maintain Equipment: 5 has been changed from off to on. Mitigation measure Implement Water/Paved Road Measures: Water All Haul Roads 2x Per Day:0 has been changed from off to on. Mitigation measure Reduce Speeds on Unpaved Roads to 15 mph or less: 0 • has been changed from off to on. Mitigation measure Mobile Equipment• Properly Maintain Equipment: 5 has been changed from off to on. Mitigation measure Architectural Coatings: Uae Low VOC Coatings: 5 has been changed from off to on. Mitigation measure Asphalt Paving: Use Low VOC Asphalt: 5 has been changed from off to on. Changes made to the default values for Area The wood stove option switch changed from on to off. The fireplcase option switch changed from on to off. Mitigation measure Central Water Heater: Cmrcl Space Heat. has been changed from off to on. Changes made to the default values for Operations The light auto percentage changed from 61.4 to 47.7. The light truck 3751-5750 percentage changed from 16.7 to 3.2. The med truck 5751-8500 percentage changed from 7.2 to 5.6. The lite-heavy truck 8501-10000 percentage changed from 1.1 to 6.9. The lite-heavy truck 10001-14000 percentage changed from 0.3 to 7.2. The med-heavy truck 14001-33000 percentage changed from 1.1 to 12.0. The heavy-heavy truck 33001-60000 percentage changed from 0.7 to 7.9. The motorcycle percentage changed from 1.4 to 0.2 The school bus percentage changed from 0.1 to 0. The motorhome percentage changed from 0.7 to 0. The operational emission year changed from 2002 to 2003. The default/nodefault travel setting changed from nodefault to: nodefault Side Walks/Paths: No Sidewalks changed to. Side Walks/Paths• Few Destinations Covered Street Trees Provide Shade: No Coverage 1J ~W Page: 10 changed to:Street Trees Provide Shade. Moderate Coverage ~estrian Circulation Access: No Destinations changed to.Pedestrian Circulation Access• Some Destinations Visually Interesting Uses: No Uses Within Walking Distance changed to.Visually Interesting Uses Moderate Number and Variety Street System Enhances Safety: No Streets changed to: Street System Enhances Safety: Few Streets Pedestrian Safety from Crime: No Degree of Safety changed to:Pedestrian Safety from Crime: Some Degree of Safety Visually Interesting Walking Routes• No Visual Interest changed to.Visually Interesting Walking Routes: Moderate Level Transit Service: Dial-A-Ride or No Transit Service changed to: Transit Service: 15-30 Minute Bus within 1/4 Mile Interconnected Bikeways: No Bikeway Coverage changed to: Interconnected Bikeways: High Coverage Bike Routes Provide Paved Shoulders: No Routes changed to Bike Routes Provide Paved Shoulders: Most Major Destinations Safe Vehicle Speed Limits: No Routes Provided changed to:Safe Vehicle Speed Limits: Most Major Destinations Uses w/in Cycling Distance: No Uses w/in Cycling Distance changed to:USes w/in Cycling Distance: Large Number and Variety Bike Parking Ordinance: No Ordinance or Unenforceable changed to:Bike Parking Ordinance: Requires Unprotected Bike Racks • ~, D a`~ T H E C I T Y O F R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE January 8, 2003 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, City Planner BY Warren Morelion, Assistant Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16010 - RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION -The subdivision of 7 4 acres of land into 5 parcels in the General Industnal District (Subarea 14), located at the southeast corner of 6th Street and the I-15 Freeway - APN 229-283-08, 10 and 11 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW • DRC2002-00750 - RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION -The development of five Industnal bwldings totaling 117,790 square feet on 7 4 acres of land in the General Industnal District (Subarea 14), located at the southeast corner of 6th Street and the I-15 Freeway - APN 229-283-08, 10 and 11 BACKGROUND The applicant requested a continuance of the item to the January 8, 2003, Planning Commission meeting in order to address the limits of off-site public improvements associated with the project To date, the applicant has been in negotiations with the Engineering Division to resolve the issues Attached is the December 11, 2002, staff report for your reference RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16010 and Development Review DRC2002-00750 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions and issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declarati n Brad Buller City Planner BB WM/~c Attachments Exhibit "A" - Letter dated December 11, 2002, requesting a continuance . Exhibit "B" - December 11, 2002, Staff Report Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16010 Draft Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2002-00750 Q , o as Exhibit "E" Deo 11 02 OSs07p ~ok Huquet 811624 ~ Charles Joseph Associates RIBIJGPRNATE RECTOR MANAGEMENT S DeOBRlber 11, 2002 Brad Buger, City Planner City of Random Cucamonga P. O. Box 807 Ranctw Cucamonga, CA 91729-0807 Re: C ~~ DRC2002-00750nand DRC20 2-0075 DevelopmE~rt pear Brad: This is as a follow~up to dscussions with our dier5t. City staff and you tt1i8 aRemoon conoeming the referenced matter. As we discussed. our office was recently retarded tb assist with this project. Review and evaluation of the recommended conditions of approval as ttley pertain m street improvemerts "~ our diem has determined that the project, as recommended, is riot feasible due to the costs assocyated for the conditioned improvements. We are currency • working with City F~lgineering to determine what modifications can be made with the current recommended conditions in order to allow our drent to 6e able m move forward with these arrreA indlrsttial projects. ' Bated upon atl the foregoing, we are requesting a continuance of the referenced project hearing iberrls t0 January 8, 2003, which well allow us to Cow our remedial activity with tl1e respet~i5re parties of interest. tfVe are truly hoping tp be able tb establish a reasonable nexus of rmprovemece~mplated ~ diem at proportionate >d the scale and scope of the project these locations. The continuing professional courtesy extended by the City in this regard is most appredabed by our went Please feel free to contact me at your earliest opportunity should you have any questions or need of additional inforrrlation or assistance with this matter. Sincerely. Charts J. Buquet Charles Joseph Associates Cc: Richard Wagner, RKW Development . Dan James, City Engineering Ufrrc9rNMN1.1822 8pp•yr0.1R22 ry„909.981.1824 Cay Ccusr • 10681 FnMh~ Blvd.. Suite :595 • Rmdu, Cucmwryp4 (;A • 91730 A t:A1J14I1tN1A I%)Ylt)QA77f1N / % ~ a1~ a~ p.2 • S~IZepolt DATE December 11, 2002 TO: Chauman and Members of the Planrnng Commission FROM Brad Buller, City Planner BY Warren Morelion, Assistant Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16010 - RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION -The subdivision of 7 4 acres of land into 5 parcels in the General Industrial District (Subarea 14), located at the southeast corner of 6th Street and the I-15 Freeway -APN 229-283-08, 10 and 11 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2002-00750 - RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION -The development of froe industrial buildings totaling 117,790 square feet on 7 4 acres of land m the General Industrial District (Subarea 14), located at the southeast corner of 6th Street and the I-15 Freeway -APN• 229-283-08, 10 and 11 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION. A Surrounding Land Use and Zomno• North - Industrial Budding, General Industrial (Subarea 14) South - Industrial Budding, General Industrial (Subarea 14) East - Vacant Land, General Industrial (Subarea 14) West - I-15 Freeway B General Plan Desionations Protect Site - General Industrial North - General industrial South - General Industrial East - Generallndustnal West - Generallndustnal C Site Characteristics The protect site encompasses 3 existing vacant parcels at the southeast corner of 6th Street and the I-15 Freeway The site is bordered by vacant land to the east, the I-15 Freeway to the west, one industrial bwlding to the north and one to . the south One mature walnut tree exists close to the center of the site Access mto the site will be from 6th Street and Hyssop Drive Dt v Exhibit "F" PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM16010/DRC2002-00750 - RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION December 11, 2002 Page 2 D. Parking Calculations Number of Number of Square Parking Spaces Spaces Tvoe of Use Footage Ratio Regwred Provided Building 3 19,052 Office 2,000 1/250 8 0 Warehouse 3,452 1/1000 3.5 Manufactunng 13,600 1/500 27.2 Total 39.0 47.0 Budding 4 22,832 Office 2,000 1/250 8 0 Warehouse 4,132 1/1000 41 Manufactunng 16,700 1/500 33 4 Total 46.0 48.0 • Budding 5 27,412 Office 2,000 1/250 8 0 Warehouse 5,112 1/1000 5.1 Manufacturing 20,300 1/500 40.6 Total 54.0 59.0 Budding 6 25,724 Office 2,000 1/250 8.0 Warehouse 4,724 1/1000 4.7 Manufactunng 19,000 1/500 38.0 Total 51.0 56.0 Budding 7 22,777 Office 2,000 1/250 8.0 Warehouse 4,170 1/1000 4 2 Manufactunng 16,600 1/500 33 2 Total 46.0 48.0 ANALYSIS A General The protect, "The Vineyards East," consists of five mdustnal buildings that are from 19,052 square feet to 27,412 square feet m size The applicant proposes to divide the site into 5 parcels that range from 1.2 acres to 1 5 acres in size The buildings have been designed with one cohesroe architectural style that includes painted tdt-up concrete with a sandblasted accent treatment that is used on all sides ~fL J\ L.J PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM16010/DRC2002-00750 - RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION December 11, 2002 Page 3 of each bwlding The office portions of the buildings have glass, column treatments, entry archways (Buildings 4 and 7 only), and metal canopies and protections that make them easy to identify The design of the bwldings include truck loading areas with roll-up doors on the rear/sides of the bwldings and dock high door truck wells on the freeway sides of the bwldings The loading areas are screened from view by decorative screen walls The protect is located next to the I-15 Freeway where it is highly visible from public view. As a result, the buildings have been designed so all roof-mounted egwpment is screened from the elevated freeway Because of the protect's location, landscaping within the freeway nght-of-way or an in-lieu construction cash deposit for future development will be regwred Accompanying the protect is another proposal (SUPTPM16009/DRC2002-00751) for four industnal bwldings on the west side of the I-15 Freeway, "The Vineyards West" The project has been submitted by the same developer and is similar in architectural design B Design Review Committee The Design Review Committee (Mannenno, Stewart, Coleman) reviewed the protect on November 5, 2002 (Exhibit "I") The architect • brought revised plans to the meeting that addressed all of the City's design concerns The Committee was pleased with the revisions and recommended the protect be forwarded to the Planning Commission for rewew and action C Technical and Grading Review Committees The Technical and Grading Committees reviewed the project and recommended approval D Tree Removal Permit DRC2002-00836 On October 21, 2002, a Tree Removal Permit was submitted for removal of 1 Walnut tree on-site, as well as for the 65 mature trees on 'The Vineyards West" sde An arbonst report was completed (Jim Borer, October 30, 2002) that determined the on-site tree to be nut bearing, and therefore exempt from the Tree Removal Permit process E Environmental Assessment The applicant prepared Part I of the Initial Study and staff completed Part II and determined that the protect could have a sigrnficant adverse environmental impact on short-term air quality during site grading The mitigations listed in the Irntial Study Part II and attached Resolution of Approval will reduce the short-term impact to less than sigrnficant A number of focused Delhi Sands Flower-Loving Fly (DSF) surveys were conducted by Impact Sciences from August 1999 to September 1999 on the 3 parcels that make up the protect site The surveys showed no observation of DSF durng the survey penods In addition, no other sign of recent DSF occupation was detected Further observation of the site showed characteristics that are not consistent with areas currently occupied by DSF . populations because of ongoing exposure to weed abatement, disking, fertilizing, and pesticide applications The surveys determined that the overall insect diversity on the site was very low as compared to the sites dominated by native or weedy vegetation, and that important plant species indicative of potentially swtable DSF g , 0 3a PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM16010/DRC2002-00750 - RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION December 11, 2002 Page 4 habitat were entirely absent Because of the site's exposure to soil disturbances, overall absence of indicator species, and negative focused DSF survey results dunng the 1999 survey season, the surveys concluded that the site does not likely support a DSF population, and development of the site will not impact endangered, threatened, or rare speces or their habitats CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Dadv Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the protect site RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Commission approve Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16010 and Development Review DRC2002-00750 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions Respectfully submitted, Br d Buller City Planner BB WM mlg Attachments Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "B" - Tentative Parcel Map Exhibit "C" - Site Plan Exhibit "D" - Grading Plan Exhibit "E" - Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit "F" - Bwlding 3 Elevations Exhibit "G" - Bulding 4 and 7 Elevations Exhibit "H" - Building 5 and 6 Elevations Exhibit "I" - Design Review Action Agenda dated November 5, 2002 Exhibit "J" - Initial Study Draft Resolution of Approval for SUBTPM16010 Draft Resolution of Approval for DRC2002-00750 ~ , ~ 33 m x a~ :+ D SITE UTILIZATION ~, MAP ~; i NOTE. EXISRNG TONING FOR PROJECT SITE 6 80O RADIUS < IS GENERAL INDUSTRPL (GI) R 0 35 50 1 00 THE VINEYARDS EAST TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 16 I~ e o r t~0 r f~ eae ~' ~ ~ ~ ]~e a ij ~~ ]~ i ES i W ~ o i! ~~a ~ Hl,li ~ IJl~ji ] ~l ~ !I Z ~~~ i ~~ l ~l~i~i ~ , . Q d ay~ ~~S e~~~i$ ~~~ Ie ~I ~ ~ ~~ ' _ ~ IL i ~~j gip ! f W g~~e a } t $1 , } js111~. ij~ ~ a °~~ ~ ~ 9 t o ~1,~~ tg l,r + ~~1 L• ~~ ~ li~f~~~ ~, } } ~~~li~+~ l d ;B 9 ~J9LE ; l~ua I ni ! i ~;tl~ ~ ;S,iii , l~~Vi,~,r,i a 'r ~~ E ~ ~_ a 5 `~ f ~~ ~~ ~h ' ~- i _, ;. .; i ~ i ~Y (lll ~.a I ~. ~, i~ i~~) i ~'~) 1 ~1 ,~ ~ ~~ y i i\ i V~ i i r ~~~ ~i ~ 'l ~ 1 ~1 • yFFl i it i~\ i t1 . ! i i i `9 ~)i _9!~ ^~ / a -s~ --~ ~ -- ~. >-- ~-- ~_3 ~ i\ t 4I { -r-_~-_~--~ - -~J-__ __ II ~ 1 U Z~ _ t•_ l' 9_1- l ~4 . flu I I- t_. t s~ 'z, ~1 ~__\4 ->~-V-M Exhibit "B" ~~/~~~~- tI i- ~ I I i\ i e jJ i ~n p~ 1 i i 1. -o-~ i r ~ ~ ~ i ~ I' \] I ' T 1 - ~i- ~° t i i ''~ ~~ i 1-, ~ I ~ u` 1~ w i J i \ 1 ` \ ~I i ~ ;~ ,~ ~ I' ~~ 1~ ,~' . '~.~ ~). . ~ \~ `. ! n 6~ - rwar ~~~ ''' ~ d J r ~ a m~_ 1s--~-~1.... $ , (~ 35 ri^___t- _~. .~_.~_. _- -~•~ `\- r i ~--_ - t -f m X n N NT I ,^~°' I n p I LL ~ _P._ CP -- Q I W v.AC.wT MNEVAnpI HYSSOP DRIVE ~ - ~ ~ -- - -- .m.,J~) I yti d i b S mod. fye rv { 1 H'N J R4 b •f^x ~i Y +* k .~,~ t; ±( ~ -_ ~ - ~ i ?SLLe_ R v_. 2p C E~R ~ ri a; k ~ Pv. 'f _ 'fiF`°iNA ,'~rarfl e ~ 'p ^{' e~ - ~l ~ ' l y y ~ rn . ..N ~~.i i ,al' ~ 4 j~ CR~ n ,- „ ~ hg; - ' 3 ._....~ 1 _ ' d Eb a _ ...a. <.. ~ ~ _ BLDG ~ tom- BL DG. ~ B DG.I~--', ~ ~ BLDGE 7 5 y 22,8 2 SF , V 2 412 SF 2 724 SF ; ~ 22 77 SF ~ ••" ' , ` ~ ,E , , P )) 3 x F Un BT~ 11,5316F) ~ , nA YB a,46 ~ ~ ~ r cLR s ~a ~ y 3 4 BSc • . ~ ;r I BLDG ~ ^ , ,~ .p[IpBE).,.: , ~ ~~- :~_ ~ 1 g~ ~l~ . :t, - - II i~. sr _~ e ono ~ ~ 11 _ ~ ~ S05'2~~ d ~ ~ ' I ' ~~ i ~ va ~'~ i ^ ~ ~ t b I,I I ~~ ~ 1 ,,C~,•~ J~rv i ~ P " ~y,,,, ~ ~},~]I' rv ~ ~ ~ .. I ' ., ~ E ' ~, ~ f r~ I 4'y t Iy I i I ~~ I I i i l rv ~ , ~ 1 ~~ IIL y]~~ Fl;f IMEa Rtp , ~~f ~II4'pLE/Ilil A I ' I ~ ' , .~. ~ ' Yr ' 7:^, _~'r!t'~4 c A q~'~ - u.~d y4 ,..• yi;~t=,' li , ~ i,~ ...~~_ ' ~M I_i ,y~'~}y.• ~ ~I}i::L' 31 ~ ~ ~ y d~ d y 'f i ' {ir~ ~l s~!',7~ y{~y,_ t~. A R~rv.~ ~~ i 4 ! ~___-_ :u , +{ ,~ Q f _ t\ I ....~ ". , i` M N.r - ~ ~ i '~ ti~'F; _ UCK WEL ~ Aye _~ ~' ~ . ~ ~ ~ , r ,,. i ~: ~~ __ '` '~W TRUgt f ______ i ~ w~EL . n _______ ~e F{. I y S : , ~ - S EU . - ~v t _ 1~ -------- - , _ _____ .k '~'t ' U'r ~~ ~ ^ I r .f '_syy fi it ~- m ~_ - .... .r,_ t . , ~ : , , i ~ >~ ~ :, • ' , . I -~ ~~ ~ ~ __~ ~°--,. _ - _ _ ., rv. •_ F .III ~ '.; ~ -' . ; I ~ I I I ;, ;~ ,. _ ry~or~i .a II~.° A iii ~~~ xmsenf w5v,x iv. v ur n.e via - u,A~Yeec„v,loN STATE HIGHWAY 15 PER C.LL 1R/J!5 RON YAP {01583 PC x PROJECT DATA 5DG ] 1 5~ fi ]~ INU AQA I IS,I - IT nv~ - nl - IID ~ '~ beexl am nY:~ nm arm I >r Rmc PEanD ~ mGE@ums xmSaD-e Iomao-e xrm~-e xmDaw•e xao5za-e WMRAC1111RIG@vms Iy(myA-nx IflMS1. a. aawm-be Isaosoo-a lem~D-ax WIAf11R5E@III LW3 ]eSLI D]•]SI elallbA.el SIILI IW.SII IRYI eL •1] ,ImYI~-eP 101K1EQiE9 8 19 Y _ 51 b I GNMYGiPTQD __ 1] __ - b 9 Y b~ WAffNEA4FA ffL`IFED 6,az I 66b -- IeYI _ - _ IYO i _ _ - _fl115 WRYIYENFARYTSEO I 9.® ] ® IA I B~ I _ __ _ ~I ___, 4 __ _ Ob n61A®S RN,]®S,PM40OA®S R I6ly®SPW 9®9 V ~Illb,b.YVV/m@f M, W~YNp31) THE VINEYARDS EAST Rancho Cucamonga, Callfornla RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 135]1 RU3HMORE UNE SANTA ANA CA 82]05 TEL p141505-1575 AITN RICMMO K WApNER • \\~ I~~ _ roru -- 1 ^e®]c ~ Inmos SRE m ~ ~ i A VICINITY MAP ,,, xbePb£8 _ be B51Cf5rv Jte]o SEllxxnFTl z]6~oB llx,x REn ob_____ .]R4G IE MVNLEt,.uP SITE PLAN LEE d SAKAMARA Art~01~RECTS AAA vxwe ~•~••,~ mm ` ~ Ai i i 8 ~ I 'i~Ili I I Ir' ~~ ~ ~ ~ ;~ I f ~ ; ~ ~ ,, t ~ ! i ~ ~ ~ ~~"~ r~ I I ~ i ,3 ~ ~il~ II j ~~!I ji a i i I ~~ ~ `/ I M 1 ,.j ~ , ,~! ~ .j I!I ~ I i t a I~~I~I~ .i MtHtt IF ~\~ ,( ~ i r I ~. :~ ~~ I ~ ! ~~ 4 j i ~ j ~~ ~'i~lll I i ~ ~ i l ~ ~~ 3Q {]~ e ~ ~ ~ " Iii,! ~ ~ ~ t! ~1!!1!! ~ i ~ ! ~ ~~ , ~ , ' ' ' 11~ I I ~~q ! ~p I;~f1~ ~iL~ei ti`'1 I h ~ il!! f~!} ~;.e~i i ~~'' (,, e i . ' i l IJfi ~ 11ai ~!jlii', ~ MuE wi,€ elje;3lt ' I ' I ~ I I ;i ~ i - i rig ;;' \r I I i ~ 1 \~ 1 ~~ ~, i r it ''S i~ i ~ r i~ i )t ' II I i ~ ¢I 5 J 3, i I I^ • r ,~ i~ ur ~~ S ~ i i ~ ~ r~ F ~g ~ ~'~~ ~~ s !~ • ~ ; i. .i i~ i~ t! '1 1 ~ f w .i I. ~~T {_y:-s-__7--I--__C~~ fit- -___~o.-___ __y ~___ "t ~o -` - ( I 1 I ~ r it ~ ~~ i i~l i~ i..r-...~I , v &~ ne __T _ . ~ dmm_!~! _ _ :y \ ~ .r .'y ' ~ . n i I ?,: r r r.'_li~^_-'~Z'-~! i._-~wa 3~.V1&~$W ~yG...~l~ ) i s i I j '~ j_-__~_i r ~ li ^,j___~3/~ i i r e 1 \_ i i` e Qw~~ __f~ \ -c__ ~_.~~___a-: =yS ~~~Y t- r~ .l x 6 D 3`~ Exhibit "D" i~/~~/ate ~ ~wnnl-ii iaf~iR~YM Unu~4 nvr~nlr`mV~ v~ax~nniivm "„ '"o.«.:,:-: 1sv~ suavAaNin aHd, a ~ +- 3dV )ti4NVl Nl1Nf1H JNO>IN IWJUI~A~(1 Mtlil ""` y ~Sai 9~. NV IJ 9VIINV IJ la VNI WI'1lMJ ,~~,,. aaa aaaa ids ¢~iz ~~~ ~~~~ i ~ !~ 3 9 if i i' I~ !t ! 3 ~1 i ~ ~ ~ !4 ~ ~ i ~f a ~ D ~~ i~iiiiit i t i !d` I~~~~i~E !~ 1 f i~ .f t@ gi a ~ ~ i~ i ~! dE i ~~ i ff ~ e~ ~ ~4 ~ ~! i' ~ if ~! ~~ ~ ~!~®O Cad-- i s. ! ~ i d! > >a as of ~ ~! ~ ~ } ~;9~~~~~l~i ~ ~ fd I ! ; ~~ ~~ ~~ i~ ~~ :~ ~ ~~~o~®~y,o~~ Exhibit "E" ~i/ii/ay >_~ of a o! ~' x i ~ - ~~, .~ ~; i w ` Q ; ai m x -n 0 N ~ _„;-~ \ HNN t5 BIDG 1 aw . _.o.... ~ /uwu~ti....o. L.y_ i OPoVE Wav c G, wLaR ~Ho pa ~~ 3 ~ em B.~r.....~„n. THE VINEYARDS EAST Rancho Cucamonga, Callfomia muc omwH Rerewa - lFN! PN1Ql1MP BLDG. 3 ELEVATIONS RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 13832 RUBHMORE LANE BNNiA ANA CA 92)06 ~ ~ ~~.~urtss iEt. ptgsos ts3s •",~~ •,,~• , • A2 A1TN RICHARON WAONER rA.O w X00-t603 11-t-03 NORTH (sin st I '""'°'"°"° ewsT _v -~ ~ m x a r: ~i \ TYPe BLDG. SECTION (FOR VINEYARDS EAST) O N EAST (HYSSOP DR ) aI auu~n _a C7 a a l WEST cHW1' ~s) al , ` -- ---- - --- ---- -------~ ---~~ IX%dILEOEM - -- - ~ - - - -- ~ - -- --- -- --- ~ - ; T-- - cD °.a, , E3m_~~ ~~, ~., . .,. j ca ~w, ...~.~.,w.,. ,..~.m~. Hwr ,ems RLOO 21N FRONT 'M41O m"^1°""" 0~ ~ GJ` rLJ~ f2 lr_ls •cgic o°anrv aen°we - NORTH '~"' °""~`""° BLDG. 4 ( D ( THE VINEYARDS EAST Rancho Cucamonga, Calltomia FLE S S,T YPSECT LEE d SVfAHAM RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION w~~~Nry ~ 13833 RUSHMORE UNE SANTA ANA CA 93J05 TEL mgsos-,sJS _ _ ...a a ~~ .,..m,,,m, r,,,. `. A3 ~ - TEN RICHARDK WAONER ~ v3ae eo-iem i • ~ n < ,,. s S L ., .., .- HV/V 15 ENrRV Lv:..,.s. ~^®~^,• 1-••. aLm e I atDG 5 EAST (HYSSOP DR t -- - - ~- _ _ TRUCK WELL ei • -1"-- souTH nVIIE.S`T (HWY 15) ,_~. r~i •.o me.~ ~r~umr.m / ~~ NORTH THE VINEYARDS EAST Rancho Cucamonga, Callfomia RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 13822 RUSMMORE LANE SANTA ANA CA 9t]05 TEL p1d1505-1515 AITN RICHARDK WAGNER ENTRY -ec~ ~ • ORNE WAV ~~ iTRUCK WELL _____ • 4uLGM lEOENO ®me ®~ ©mn ~ • „ui ~uuumvmy IhVT 15-~ i •~ninamJ ~~u ~ ARi1C cesnH RenEwe ]EM VYICFL I.UV BLDGS.S &6 ELEVATIONS lEE 6 SANAHAM MCHI~ECf-5 AIA~ 11 1 O] C~ DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 8.30 p m Warren Morelion November 5, 2002 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM 16010 - RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION -The subdivision of 7.4 acres of land into five parcels in the General Industrial Distnct (Subarea 14), located at the southeast comer of 6th Street and the I-15 Freeway -APN: 229-283-08, 10 and 11. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2002-00750 - RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION -The development of five mdustnal buildings totaling 117,790 square feet on 7.4 acres of land in the General Industnal Distnct (Subarea 14), located at the southeast comer of 6th Street and the I-15 Freeway -APN: 229-283-08, 10 and 11. Desi4n Parameters: The protect site ~s located on three vacant parcels at the southeast comer of 6th Street and the I-15 Freeway. The applicant intends on subdividing the three parcels into five parcels. The site is bordered by vacant land to the east, the I-15 Freeway to the west, one industrial budding to the north, and one mdustnal building to the south. Access into the site will be from 6"' Street and Hyssop Drive. The project, 'The Vineyards East,' will consist of five mdustnal buildings ranging in size from 19, 052 square feet to 27,412 square feet: Accompanying this protect is another proposal (SUBTPM16009/DRC2002-00751) forfour Industnal buildings on the west side of the I-15 Freeway, 'The Vineyards East' Both projects have been submitted by the same developer and are similar in design The five mdustnal buildings have been designed with one cohesive architectural style that includes painted tilt-up concrete with a sandblasted treatment. The sandblasting is used substantially on Buildings 4 and 7, primarily at the base of the buildings, and spanngly on the base of Buildings 3, 5, and 6. To enhance the budding designs, the office areas on all the buildings include glass and column treatments to make them easier to identify. The project went through a Preliminary Review (DRC2002-00241) and has addressed many of the issues identified. One of the main concerns mentioned was the IocaUon of the protect as d relates to the I-15 Freeway, and the need for attractive screening of work, loading, and storage areas, as well as all roof- and ground-mounted equipmentfrom freeway views. With this submittal il is still unclear how all rooftop egwpment will be screened. Staff C~ menu' The following comments are intended to prowde an outime for Committee discussion. Major Issues. The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this protect: 1 The protect is located on the southeast corner of 6th Street and the I-15 Freeway where it is highly wsible from the raised I-15 Freeway. Ultimately, slope planting along the freeway will prowde some screening. A sight line section through the I-15 Freeway travel lanes has not been provided The Committee should discuss the different options of screening that best suits the proposed development. Per Development Code requirements, all roof, wall, and ground-mounted egwpment shall be screened from all sides and architecturally integrated into the budding designs Exhibit "I" /1,/ir/z ~, o ya • , DRC COMMENTS SUBTPM16010 & DRC2002-00750 - RKW DEV.CORP. November 5, 2002 Page 2 Secondary Issues: Once all of the maior issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: Buildings 3, 5 and 6 have been designed with substantially less sandblasting treatment than Bwldmg 4 and 7, however, staff believes that this vanety provides an overall appearance for the proiect consistent with the City's Design Gwdelmes. 2. The sandblasting treatment is located pnmadly at the base of the buildings. To increase ks visibility, sandblasting should be higher on elevations where it is visible. 3. Provide decorative textured paving at proiect entnes. 4. Provide 5-foot landscape planters along the west sides of all buildings to satisfy Code requirements. Trees are regwred at a rate of 1 tree per 30 linear feet of building elevation on all sides, and a rate of 1 tree per 3 parking stalls. 5. A 5-foot minimum landscape planter would normally be regwred in the side yard of Budding 7; however, due to the adioining existing budding this elevation will not be visible to the public along Hyssop Dnve. The Planning Commission has authordy to waive side yard setbacks in master planned developments. Add berming in front landscape setback where possible (average of 3 feet m height and undulated). Policv Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the protect design without discussion: 2. Provide tables and chairs/benches m employee lunch/eatmg areas. 3. Provide bicycle parkmg/racks as part of protect design. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends the Committee approve the protect subtect to the above-mentioned comments. Desion Review Committee Action. Members Present John Mannenno, Pam Stewart, Dan Coleman Staff Planner. Warren Morelion The architect brought revised plans to the meeting to address all of the above-mentioned comments. The Committee liked the revisions and recommended the protect be forwarded to the Planning Commission for review and action 8, D ~3 v - CITY OFRgNCHOCUCAMONGq ENVIRONMENTAL SEP 17 ~ppy INFORMATION FORM (Part I -Initial Study) Gtyo/Rancno Cucamonga RE~ENEp. p P/annmg Dmsron L~NNtNG (909)477-2750 The purpose$of this'fo~m~ s to;Iriform'the'C'ity of theaasic'~e'omPonents~.o~;?tlie~;p oposed~ puidel nes;tt e"Califo na E nronmerita~l Quality Act'aU d``tFie Ctyty~''Rules~antl~P~ocedures` y ~ ~H to Implemerit CEQA. Ifris mportasnt•~that the>informatiori~requested +n'tliis application be provided in fu1L ~ ~ ,' ~ ~~'` ~ ~ -~~~" INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL JOT BE PROCESSED Please note that tt rs the responsrbrlity o/the applicant to ensure that fhe appl/cat~on is complete at fhe trm a of submittal, Crty stall wUl not 6e available to peAOrm work required to provide missing rnlormahon Application Number for the pm/ect to vhrch this /orm pedarns '' // i ~~ ~ Protect Tfi E V / N E 's a ,. ,. ~ e4 cr CB(~6~ 3/T) S/ ~b ~ r ~y Title Name & Address of pro/ecf owner(s) p L~ A SE S E fF TTAGrf~D Name 6 Address of developer or profit-cf sponsor ~kW ~ V~LOP MErJT CORPORRT/OI~I (~ O Q D X 3 72 ~{- T(/sT/nI ~ GR 927P/- 37z1,G - Contact Person & ~~ GH A K A K W /~ G~ E R Address /362,2 /QUSffMdK~ LJRAJE S J4 n1 T/+ /9-N k CR- 9 z 7o.S' - Exhibit "J" i2///~~- g. D'P`I ~~~ n n~nnnir_~cwni ~rnaMS(COUNTf R\INITSTDt WPD 3/00 Page 1 C~ Name 8 Address oI person prepanm this form (d drtterent Irom above) SAM Telephone Number ~~f'f") Sr7S - /S 73 In/ormatron indicated by asterisk ('J rs rot required of non-construction CUP=s unless otherwise requested by sta% '1 J Provide a /ull scale (8-12 x 11J < spy o/the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the protect site, and indicate the site boundaries 2) Provide a set of color photogrepl s which show representative views into the site hom the north, south, east and west wows into and /rom the site from 'he primary access points which serve the site, and representative views of significant lectures lrom the site Include a nap showing location o/each photograph 3J Protect Location (describe) S W ~ U A D K A ~/ T D L ~~-~ ST, /41JA N Ysso l° AVE / 8UT irtoT /IJCLbD/AI!' TIf~E VEILV oIe,VEA2~G1R PPING ~4EHJti1D T/FE CofcaJEK 14tJD RUUU/Ar[ SDUTN 8ETG1PFi1 fJyssal~' 4J Assessor-s Parcel Numbers (att[ ch add~Gonal sheet i/ necessary) f}PN 229- 2~3-d8 Rz9-X83-/Od// 'SJ Gross Sde Area (adsq tt) ~ 7 d ,3 '6) Net Srte Area (total site size mrnu: area of public streets & proposed dedications) C 7)Descnbe any proposed general plap amendment or zone change which would affect the protect site (attach additional sheet i/necessary NONE TD t7U/t f~CTUf}L KNOGJLFDGE 3, D ~5 11PLANNINGIFINAL\FORMSICOUNTER~ NITSTDI WPD 3/00 Page 2 8) Include a description of all per nits which wdl be necessary Irom the Crty of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agenaes m order to fully imple Went the pro/ect D .S/ G~ /tEU/L~~ - T~n17RT/ UE PARCEL MA-P - G/tA D/n/G ' i f3UlLD/n!(rT PLUM Q/.~IG~- ~L6'c~ra/cAL - MECNfFaJ/crtG Favcaos~ cun~~yT ~M ~T 9) Describe the physical setting of she sde as d exists before the pro/ect including rnlormabon on topography, sod stabdrty, plants and animals, mature frees, trail ,and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects Describe any exrsbng structures on site (including age and condd~on) ai d the use of the structures Attach photographs oJsrgnificant Ieatures described In addrhon, site all sources o/rnlormation (e ,geological and/or hydrologic studies, brot~c and aroheological surveys, tra/fic studies) "TffF E~-1T//ZE S/TE /S f+ ~LA-T pPER~TiNG- y/ ti/,E ~~ n -r-,s~E~ F R/e~' /ya T~ ~E r ~ a rT l2 UC T u,e t S T f-f ~ ..so /L i s .¢-,/ 6x c~ t-«.c/~ S f~- til D x L n R M rSo/~S 14.E PD R 7 ,~Y .T/D GE.o T~ChhUK~fL/ T ._J C T~a~f p~ TAI ~2QOrZ L J f 0)Descnbe the known cultural ands it historical aspects o1 the site Site all sources o/rnformahon (books, published reports and oral history) ~ C G n 2 n Lnl U Try G/~ LL E A ND (LJ /.t/E R }~ L.J/`fo a PE/tA TES' Tfti`E U /n/ F Svc K D TH-~ -s'i T,E /ffl-s ,B,E~rt i _ h _ ~r/t t F VA-!2 n ~'DIQ ,~P~rC.o.C 81J S~~f~K.S. $,Dy1~ u 11PLANNING\FINAL\FORMSICOUNTE R\INITSTDI WPD 3/00 Page 3 11)Descnbe any noise sources an 1 their levels that now aNect the site (airoratt, roadway noise, etc) and how they wdl aflect proposed uses THE s /TE /s a e rar-FU-t Tn r- /r lJ /Ti1 r-/r R,4/s EE APp,ce/o, 2~ TD 23 i"7-. ,4 B0VE Th`F S/TE 12 di4 D Sri/Jt ~'~7 et? I~-1~ ~"/~ T AI07 .~ +>-~.J M A /N ~ ~~~~/r ,FY/AJIJ eF ,S UCe~ No /s ~ /s tit ~-r- ,a ,y 7-/e / to kT~~ _. A~M P,,l EAfT NO1 S`~ WILL NUI- f'rFF-EC]" 7}+L PxzoR~~ USE. 12)Descnbe the proposed protect in ietail This should provide an adequate descnpt~on o/the site in terms of ultimate use which wdl result tram the proposed p2 act Indicate r/there are proposed phases /or development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the inticipated completion o7each increment Attach add~bonal sheet(s) it necessary TfIL`' 11 /w.l~ Vf~ /4 ,CS EAST /.J/L L 8F ]n /4- E ~_~T/F~ ~!rl1 E ~git D s /~l 6ST /s P}/-AJE T ~ S't /,s A l ~.5~ 8LA ~r LlGI+~T )NnusT-crA-L PAIQ.K ea,JS/.rT/w/G eF= !~'~DC 3- /~,os.Z so T f~LaG (I.-_2~/~32 ~Ft% IjLD(.S 27 [F-/_~.~Ff~, BLDG z.S~,72~j QLaG.7- 22~7a_ SyF,F. ofd 7Nr EAsr ~ia6 0~ r-/s sov77f o F 6~ ST. /YN b !~J Es T D F ffYs.re P C L LcA l2 /fE /G rf Ts GJ/ LL RE z N- FT. 6,4c /~ 8 L A G. ~ /LL r/st-v E ~~,pm s~ ~f o F aF~/cE-/ GJ/f^/Cff /.J-/LL /,V Gc.va E f~PPKn x - /boa Sit nF ME~z,r,~/.U~ Sf3AC~s; • s+L~ ~La ~>-s ~/L~_,(~VE /Jock -H/ TT~UCK ~ccE.~', cOMPL,E7~j~/ l s SC F4-E .D U L E D ~n R lf~+- fJ TK ~O 03 13JDescnbe the surrounding proper ies, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, histoncal, or scenic aspects Indicate the type of lane use (residential, commercial, etc ), intensity o/land use (one-/amity, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc) a. 'd scale of development (height, /rontage, setback, rear yard, etc ) TD T/fE ~t7 RTff /S ~~.ST (~~ %T!/ Ex / c ~/w1G H/4NUF~R/N(,- Il S~ ,y0 KTff- o~ TffE .ST1~6 ~ T - % ~ Tff-E G/~ S`T /S _~ /3~ TD Tff~ SD UTf/ /s ~iC /sT/~tJ/ Mrt-,cJU wit-CTUK/~JG U.SE~ ~'*'o Tff"' .,Cff-cT /s ~l~'SSd ~' J~/Q/ U.~ A-u~ fF-IC~ OP~l~ft-T/AlG V/,vE y'~-RD - 14)WiII the proposed protect change i ie pattern, scale or character of the surrounding general area o/ the prolect~ N'D Tf>`E G~,v~,c~L ~fl-7lE/2I1 stub SCr4LE !s i ~~ t,~1 ,/,g l~/.,T - / ,Grp-T .~iv~ Us-r~z.,q-L ,a- /v ~5 ~_ r t ~n-r_ 7-U tt /tit /,~ ~ G) (t E /fn US _ 6. ~ y~- I \PLANNING\FINAL\FORMSICOUNTEF \INITSTDI WPD 3/00 Page 4 15)Ind~cate the type of short-term and long-tens noise to be generated, including source and amount How will these noise levels affect ad/acent properties and ~ n-site uses What methods of sound proofing are proposed RnlD LER-SF TnlD SLlBSEGT 7-n MfFl2RET }gjKC>rs_ LJ E G A nJ l.10 -T I~F~~ R M /~! ~ ~--T- 'Tr>• is T/ME US~~2S ~-Nb Po7-E,JTiA-L ACID/SE / ~',JE/LA-T/ort/ '16) Indicate proposed removals an Uor replacements oI mature or scenic trees "'r~{ ~ ~ i~K- Lc ~ n "T ft ~ ,~ s (a r a K 6-~r T L Y n IJ si r~ f~ 1~R ~ L M L,q,~[,~ S~i4 PP ~ s~ L o~ ~~ ~ P A KT d ~ 7~f/-~ Sri 37 Nt /TTAL 77~ ~? l z4~~ ~c1 / ~ .~ ~ P/ eT/ N G ~ sy.~ sT,a-.c1 rir L ~l /~.~r ~~'.~ D~ TR ~E.S TO 8~ tpL A-AJ T~.D 17) Indicate any bodes of wafer (m :ludmg domestic water supplies) info which the site drams nIO N ~ T~ o u a sEC -~t~ a- L _K.c/~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ GE 18)Ind~cate expected amount o/wa erusage (See Attachment A /or usage estimates) For furtherGanficat~on, please contact the Cucamonga County Water t vstnct at 987-2591 a Residential (gaUday) Peak use (gaUday) b CommeroiaUlnd (gal/day/ae) - ~~ _S~~ Peak use (gaUmm/ac) 3 i ~ ~ 0 19)Indreate proposed method o)se vage disposal Septic Tank~_ Sewer l/septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests 1I discharge R a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generahon (See Attachment A for usage estrmat ~s) For further clanficahon, please contact the Cucamonga County Wafer Distnct at 987- 2591 a Resdenhal (gaUday) b CommeroiaUlnd (gal/day/a~) 2 ~QO RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS 20) Number of residenhal units Detached (indicate range of pan el sizes, minimum lof sae and maximum tot sae 6t~y~ U • I \PLANNING\FINAL\FORMSICOUNTI R1INITSTDI WPD 3/00 Page 5 Attached (md~cate whether unit am rental or for sale units) 21)Anhapated range of sale pnces md/or rents Sale Pnce(s) $ to Rent (per month) $ to ?2) Speaty number o/bedrooms by mit type 23) Indicate anhapated household s~ a by unit type 24) Indicate the expected number o/ chool children who will be residing wrthm the pro/ect Contact the appropnate School D~stncts as shown m Attachment a Elementary b Junior High c Senior High COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL AND INS ~/TUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Descnbe type oI use(s) and ma/or unct~on(s) o(commero~al, mdustnal or msbtuhonal uses i SpEGUL~4T/UF f3L,DGS f0~ SA LE fHND LE.4S,~- ~ o T k tilD cJ~tJ A- r 7~ff /s 7-/ M~ , 26) Total floor area of commercial, md~ stnal, or mstrtut~onal uses by - type /~J OT K tt.l D [J ~ H-7" Tf></S T/M ~ - PEC 1g- T/!/~ I \PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER' NITSTDI WPD 3/00 Page 6 r~ 27) Indicate hours of operation ~O7- K n1 d Gl AJ' ~4T TfF/ S 'T~M£- S NEC U L,4T/U~. 28) Number o/ Total employees /f 0 T K N OW,~/ R-T '7'/f/S 7'/M~ -SP~CI / LA1T7ViL _ Maxrmurn Shrff Time o/Maximum Shrff 29)Provrde breakdown o/anticipate 1/ob classrficat~ons, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an indication o/the rate o/hue /or each classification (aft rch addrhonal sheet r/necessary) ~IDT JctJoW,cJ A-T TN-lS T/ME - SPCC-' UL}~T/V~ 30) Estimation oI the number o/ wor{ 3rs to be hued that currently reside rn the City /J o T ~C i.JO t.J ~ ~4-T Tff-/s '~7-/M E - ~S'tP~ C U L ~f-T/ U~ - '31)For commeroral and rndustnal use s only, mdreate the source, type and amount o/ air pollution emissions (Data should be venfied through the South Coast Irr Quality Management Drstnct, at (878) 572-6283) N D 7- ~ ~ D LJ til A-T Titf /_ c T/ M F - SPCC UL-f><T/VE - ALL PROJECTS 32JHave the water, sewer, fire, and Bo rd control agencies serving the protect been contacted to determine their ability to provide adequate service to the proposed rro/ect~ l/so, please mdreate therrresponse D u i/~ rr P R E L/ mi l ,v ~}- R 6 U /~GJ Pti o C Fss . ,.-hr-~ P~2 o S~C~ LfJ~ S ~a [/TE7~ T7s ,4-LL .7~FPr9-iC. TiKE,tlrs. Afn AIQ~)' S~/~UF_ D~CLrA-~A-T/n.U s (~1~.eE Mf~<DE ~I~ ~ I \PLANNING\FINALIFORMSICOUNTER INITSTDI WPD 3/00 Page 7 - In the known history of this p% ~erty, has there been any use, storage, or discharge o/ hazardous and/or toxic matenals 33)Examples o/hazardous and/or ox~c matenals include, but are not limited to PCB=s, radioacbve substances, pesticides and hert~ades, fuels, or/s, solvents, and other flammable l~gwds and gases Also note underground storage o/ any of the above Please list the matenals and d ~scnbe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, d known To OUP fF!'7clA-L ~<nIDC/GEDI T/f .r.~ ,4 /2 .E /CIO n! E 34)Will the proposed pro/ect mvolvE the temporary orlong-term use, storage ord~scharge o/hazardous and/ortox~c matenals, including but not l~mih d to those examples listed above I/yes, provide an inventory o/all such matenals to be used and proposed method of d~ :posa/ The location o/such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the applic Ilion plans N D T K rc.1 D .~.t) fi- T __ f f / ~ -T/M E - SPCC ~4T/ E~ l hereby certdy that the statements /um~ rhed above and in the attached exh~brts present the data and information regwn;d /oradequate evaluation of this protect to the best o/i ry abd~ty, that the facts, statements, and mformat~on presented are true and correct tot he best of my knowledge and belief I further inderstand that add~bonal informahon may be regwmd to be submitted be/ore an adequate evaluation can be made by the City o/. tancho Cucamonga Date I ~~6 ~d y Signature ~---~ T Title ~-^ ~ ~!D 51 I \PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER~ NITSTDI WPD 3/00 Paso a ATTACHMENT A J Water Usage Average use per day Residential Single Family 600 gal/day ApUCondo 400 gal/day Commercial/Industrial General and Rey uonal Commercial 3000 gal/daylac Neighborhood C ~mmercial 1500 gaUday/ac General Industrl d 1500 gaVdaylac Industrial Park 3000 gal/daylac Peak Usage For all uses Average u: ~ x 2 0 Sewer Flows Residential Single Family 270 gal/day ApUCondos 200 gal/day . C o m m e rc i s I/I n d u stria I General Comme roial 2000 gaUday/ac Neighborhood C ~mmeraal 100-1500 gal/day/ac General Industn d 2000 gal/day/ac Heavy Industrial 3000 gal/day/ac Source Cucamonga County Wai ;r District Master Plan, 9/86 D 5a I \PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUN i ER\INITSTDI WPD 3/00 Page 9 • ATTACHMENT B • LJ Contact the school dlstnct for your area for amount and payment of school fees Elementary School Districts Alta Loma 9350 Base Llne Road, Si Ite F Rancho Cucamonga, CP 91730 (909)987-0766 Central 10601 Church Street, Sul a 112 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 989-8541 Cucamonga 8776 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 987-8942 Ehwanda 5959 East Avenue P O Box 248 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 (909) 899-2451 High School Chaffey Hlgh School 211 West 5th Street Ontano, CA 91762 (909)988-8511 ~ g, D s3 I \PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTE 2\INITSTDI WPD 3/00 Page 10 BACKGROUND • City of~ancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II Project File: DRC2002-00750 and SUBTMP16010 2. Related Files: DRC2002-00751, SUBTMP16009 and DRC2002-00241 3. Description of Project: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16010 - RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION -The subdivision of 7.4 acres of land into froe parcels m the General Industrial District (Subarea 14), located at the southeast corner of 6th Street and the I-15 Freeway -APN 229-283-08, 10 and 11. RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION -The development of five industrial bwldmgs totaling 117,790 square feet on 7 4 acres of land m the general Industrial Distract (Subarea 14), located at the southeast corner of 6th Street and the I-15 Freeway -APN• 229-283-08, 10 and 11 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: RKW Development Corporation P.O Box 3724 Tustin, CA 92781-3724 5. General Plan Designation: General Industrial 6. Zoning: General Industrial Distract (Subarea 14) 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The 7 4-acre site is located on the southeast corner of 6`h Street and the I-15 Freeway. Surrounding land uses include Interstate 15 to the immediate west followed by vacant land and commeraal development, 6th Street to the north followed by industrial development; Hyssop Drive to the east followed by vacant land, and to the immediate south is vacant land followed by industrial development 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Diviswn 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Warren Morelion, Associate Planner (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required: C~ 6, p 5y Initial Study for Clty of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2002-00750, SUBTPM16010 Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this pro)ect, involving at least one Impact that Is "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentlally Slgnlflcant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Slgnlflcant Impact" as Indicated by the checklist on the following pages. OLand Use and Planning (/) Transportabon/Circulatioo OPublic Services ()Population and Housing ()Biological Resources ()Utilities and Service Systems / Geolo ical Problems ()Energy and Mineral Resources / ( ) g ()Hazards ( )Aesthetics / Water Cultural Resources ( ) (/) Noise ()Recreation (/) Air I]ualrry (/) Mandatory Findings of Significance ( ) DETERMINATION On the basis of this Initial evaluation (/) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the . mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project, or agreed to, by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. Signed yr9? Warren Morelion U Associate Planner November 18, 2002 ~ , D 55 Initial Study for DRC2002-00750, SUBTPM16010 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, an explanation is required for all "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated,° and "Less Than Significant Impact° answers, including a discussion of ways to mitigate the significant effects identified ~°nly~r S~gnifitea Issues and Supporting Information Sources Pd°nlbly u~ss :he^ Sgnifidmt Mrtiga°on Spmficant No I d 1 eietl I d 1 d 1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal. a) Conflict with general plan designation or zonings () () () (/) b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or () () () (/) policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the () () () (/) vicinity d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an () () () (/) established community Comments• a-d) The proposed project was designed in accordance with the Development Code, Chapter 17 30 Industrial Districts, guidelines for development in Subarea 14 The project site is located on the southeast corner of 6"' Street and the I-15 Freeway, which has a General Plan designation of General Industrial The designation allows for manufacturing and warehousing activities No increase in density or plan amendment is proposed and therefore no land use impacts will result from the project vaemany Sign~ficam Imp°d Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Faemially u"i°u than Sgnificant MiOg°uon Sgn~fic°nt No Im d Inco tetl Im d I d 2. POPULATION AND FIOUS6JG. Would the proposal C_J • a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local () (7 () (/) population projections b) Induce substantial growth in an area either () () () (/) directly or indirectly (e.g ,through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure) • c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable () () () (/) housing (~ , fl ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 3 Initial Study for DRC2002-00750, SUBTPM16010 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 Comments• a-b) Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area. The proposed warehouses will be storage/distribution facilities. The total number of employees to be hired at the facility is currently unknown However buildings of similar size and use within the City have generally required 25 to 30 employees The additional employees would likely be hired locally. The current housing stock in the City and neighboring sties could adequately provide for the small housing market demand provided by this protect. c) The proposed protect includes the subdivision of 7 4 acres of land into five parcels and the constructioNoperation of five industrial buildings and two related office bwldings totaling 117,790 square-feet. Surrounding land uses include Interstate 15 to the immediate west followed by vacant land and commercial development, 6th Street to the north followed by mdustnal development, Hyssop Drive to the east followed by vacant land, and to the immediate south is vacant land followed by industrial development. There are no residential structures, proposed or existing, on the protect site. The proposed protect would not remove any residential structures. ~J Polentlally Sgnd¢bnt Impact Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Pptenbaly unless Tnen $ign~firant Mibgebm Sgnificenl No I p Inm rated I ad Im C 3. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result m or expose people to potential impacts involving a) Fault rupture? () () () (/) b) Seismic ground shakings O O (/) ( ) c) Seismic ground failure, including 6quefaction~ O O (/) ( ) d) Seiche hazards O O U (/) e) Landslides or mudflows? () () () (/) f) Erosion, changes in topography, or unstable soil () () () (/) conditions from excavation, grading, or fill g) Subsidence of the lands O O O (/) h) Expansive sals? O O O (/) i) Unique geologic or physical features () () () (/) i Comments: a-b) No known faults pass through the site, it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault The Red Hill Fault, or Etiwanda Avenue Fault, passes approximately 2 8 miles northwest of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies 4 7 miles to the north These faults are both capable of producing Moment Magnitude (M„,) 6 0 - 7.0 earthquakes, respectively. Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to Mw 7.5 earthquakes is 9.8 miles northeast of the site and the San Andreas Fault Zone, capable of up to Mw 8.2 earthquakes is 12 5 miles northeast of the site Each of these faults can produce f ~ CJ T Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2002-00750, SUBTPM16010 Page 5 strong ground shaking Adhering to recommendations presented m the report and the Uniform Budding Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less than significant. c) Liquefaction occurs when loose saturated cohesion-less sods are subtect to ground shaking during an earthquake of large magnitude Additionally, liquefaction may occur when the water table is less than 40 feet below ground surface. Based on soil investigations conducted at sites within the vianity, shallow groundwater levels have not been encountered historically m the area. In addition, Figure 5.1-2 of the General Plan EIR identrfies only a few isolated areas in the City where liquefaction could occur. These areas are located m the southeast portion of the City near Red Hdl. d) A seiche is an oscillation of water In a lake, reservoir or other water body The protect site is not located near a body of water. The nearest flood control channel is the Day Creek Channel located approximately 675 feet east of the site This channel only contains water intermittently. Given the distance and mterm~ttent water in the channel, development of the protect site would not expose people or structures to any potential seiche impacts. Additionally, the site is not within a 100- yearflood plain as shown on Exhibit V-5 of the City's General Plan e) The site is relatively flat and is not located in an area prone to landslides or mudflows f) The topography would be altered to accommodate the protect. Grading would be done in accordance with a grading plan approved by the Cary Engineer. g-h) A review of sod maps prepared for the area by the U.S. Department of Agriculture indicates that sod type at the site and in the vicinity is Delhi fine sand (Db). The Delhi serves consists of somewhat excessively drained, nearly level to strongly sloping sods that formed on alluvial fans in coarse-textured, wind reworked granitic material Sods are present at slopes of 0 to 15 percent in elevations ranging from 800 to 1,400 feet. These soils are rapidly permeable. Runoff is very slow and the hazard of sod blowing is generally moderate The City's General Plan indicates that most sod types in the City are very adaptable to land development and are not of an expansive nature. The site contains no unique geologic or physical features PgeMmlly Si9n~firant Impact Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potantbllr unless rnan Signifiranl Mltigabon Sign~ficent No Im C Inco eIBA Im d Im ct 4. WATER. Will the proposal result ~n~ a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, () (/) () ( ) or the rate and amount of surface water runoff b) Exposure of people or property to water related () () () (/) hazards such as flooding L~ 1 L • Initial Study for DRC2002-00750, SUBTPM16010 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 6 Prnentlely Significam Ian ~~ Issues and Supporting Information Sources Paem~al H unless man Sign~ficent Miopaaon Significant No Im cl Intro taE Im n I d c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration () () () (/) of surface water quality (e g ,temperature, dissolved oxygen, or turbidity)? d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any () () () (/) water body e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction () () () (/) of water movements f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either () () () (/) through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations, or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater () () () (/) h) Impacts to groundwater quality () () () (/) . i) Substantial reduction in the amount of () () () (/) groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies Comments• a-c) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff due to the amount of new hardscape and roof tops proposed on the site The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity that causes the disturbance of five acres or more The General Construction permit requires recipients to reduce or eliminate non-storm water discharges into storm water systems, and to develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) The Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Santa Ana Region has issued aarea-wide NPDES Storm Water Permit for the County of San Bernardino, the San Bernardino County Flood Control District, and the incorporated cities of San Bernardino County within the Santa Ana Region. The City then regwres implementation of measures for a protect to comply with the area-wide permit requirements. The applicant must prepared a SWPPP that will include Best Management Practices (BMPs) to prevent construction of the protect from polluting surface waters. This is a standard condition of approval applicable to this protect. BMPs would include, but are not limited to street sweeping of paved roads during construction, and the use of hay bales or sand bags to control erosion during the rainy season. The following mitigation measure will be implemented to ensure impacts from water runoff and erosion is less than significant ~ + Initial Study for DRC2002-00750, SUBTPM16010 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 7 1. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan that identifies Best Management Practices to be implemented during the period the site is under construction. Best Management Practices shall be identified on the grading plans for review and approval by the City Engineer. A final grading plan wdl be prepared m accordance with City standards to show how storm water runoff wtll be handled both dunng construction and post-construction Approval of grading plans and conditions applied to the protect by the City Engineer to ensure adequate site drainage and adherence to BMPs identified in the SWPPP wdl make this impact less than significant. b) Based on Exhibit V-5 of the City's General Plan, the protect site is outside of the 100-year flood plain Therefore development of the site would not expose people or structures to flood hazards. d-e) As a standard condition of protect approval, the applicant must prepare a preliminary drainage study showing how stormwater runoff would be conveyed A final report must be submitted pnor to issuance of grading permits or final map recordation. f-i) The protect would not interfere with groundwater management practices m the area as the site is not used for groundwater recharge Polanlullly S~gmficant ` ~ Issues and Supporting Information Sources aaem~any u~e s T n an Sgnificanl Mmgaaon Signifieani No 1 as Inat eteE I ea Im a 5. AIR DUALITY. Would the proposal• a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to () (/) () ( ) an existing or protected air quality wolation~ b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants () (/) () ( ) c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or () () () (/) cause any change m climate d) Create obtectionable odors () () () (/) Comments: a) The proposed protect was screened using the Urban Emission Model 2001 (URBEMIS 2001) prepared by Jones & Stokes under the gwdance of the San Joagwn Valley Unrfied Air Pollution Control District, the Ventura County Air Pollution Control Distnct, and the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The program generates emissions estimates for land use development protects The cntena pollutants screened for included: reactive organic gases (ROG), rntrous oxides (NO„), carbon monoxide (CO), and particulates (PM,o) Two of these, ROG and NO„ are ozone precursors i C Construction Emissions 8t Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2002-00750, SUBTPM16010 Page 8 • Though not required, construction emissions were screened and quantified to document the effectiveness of control measures (Table 1). Table 1 URBEMIS 2001 Construction Emissions Summary (Pounds per Day) Source ROG NOx CO PM~o Unmet Mil Unmd Mil Unmrt. Mil. Unmrt. Mrt Gradm 2 73 2.60 39 90 37.91 - - 13.97 6 87 Worker Tri s 0.41 0 41 0.57 0.57 1 09 1.09 0 11 0 11 Stations E w 0 34 0.34 0.27 0 27 - - 0 02 0.02 Mobile E ui 1.66 1.58 14 72 13 98 - - 1 13 1 08 Arch Coatm s 54 48 51 75 - - - - - - As halt 0.58 0.55 - - - - - - Totals 60 19 57.22 55 47 52 74 1.09 1.09 15.23 8 07 SCAOMD Thres 75 75 100 100 550 550 150 150 Si nificant~ No No No No No No No No • Generally, construction of a protect this size would not exceed SCAQMD thresholds for PM,o and NOx during gradmg activities, nor SCAQMD thresholds for developed conditions (post-construction impacts) for NO,. In order to reflect the warehouse nature of the proposed protect, the default fleet mix was modified to increase diesel trucks and decrease passenger vehicles (i e. automobiles, small trucks, and sport utility vehicles) Table 1 shows protect impacts before and after mitigation measures have been implemented. During gradmg, fugitive dust (PM,o) would be generated Since the region is in non- attamment for PM,o, fugitive dust would be mitigated by the following measures: 2. The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by South Coast Air Quality Management District and the Regional Water Quality Control Board) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 403. 3. Streets adjacent to the site shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 4. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions from the site during such episodes. 5. Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by South Coast Air Quality Management District and the Regional Water Quality Control Board) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. 6, O l,z\ Initial Study for DRC2002-00750, SUBTPM16010 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 9 6. The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-site based on low emission factors and high-energy efficiency. The construction contractor shall ensure the construction grading plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturers' specifications. 7. The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 8. The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. As shown in Table 2, proposed operations activities at the site would not exceed SCAOMD thresholds. Using the ITE Trip Generation Manual 6"' edition values, the URBEMIS 2001 model estimates vehicle taps associated with a designated land use The proposed protect includes the construction of froe industrial bwldmgs with related office space totaling 117,790 square feet. The ITE assoaates a tnp rate for specrfic land uses and their size The protect has an associated trip rate of 6.60 trips per 1,000 square feet Based on the square footage, the protect would generate approximately 777.41 total taps per day. Emissions associated with operation of the warehouse would be below SCAOMD thresholds as shown m Table 2 The impact is not considered signrficant Table 2 Post Construction Emissions (Pounds oer Davl Source ROG NOx CO PM,a Unmet Met Unmet. Mit. Unmet. Mit. Unmet Mit. Area Source 0.06 0.06 0 81 0.81 0 32 0.32 0 00 0 00 Mobile Source 13 49 12 72 47.29 44 57 161 75 152.48 7.29 6.87 Totals 13.55 12.78 48.10 45.38 162.07 152.80 7.29 6 87 SCAOMD Thres 55 55 55 55 550 550 150 150 Si mficant~ No No No No No No No No c-d) The proposed protect includes the construction/operation of five concrete tilt-up industrial buildings with related office space for a total of 117,790 square-feet, on approximately 7 4 acres of industrial land with adequate parking and landscaping m accordance with the City Development Code The end use of the proposed protect, storage and distnbution will not generate emissions that could cause climatic changes or obtectionable odors. • • g~~ ~a u Initial Study for DRC2002-00750, SUBTPM16010 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 10 Potentially Significant Issues and Supporting Information Sources Paentialy uness Then Significant MibgaOOn $igmficant No I p Ineo eted I p Im ep 6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result ~n a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestions () () (/) ( ) b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g , () () () (/) sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? c) Inadequate emergency access or access to () () () (/) nearby uses d) Insufficient parking capaaty on-site or off-sites O O O (/) e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists () () () (/) f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting () () () (/) alternative transportation (e g ,bus turnouts, bicycle racks) g) Rad or air traffic impacts? O O O (/) Comments• a) The proposed protect includes the construction/operation of five concrete tilt-up industrial buildings with two related office buildings for a total of 117,790 square- feet Based on proposed square footage, the ITE associates a trip rate of 6.60 trips per day per 1,000 square feet of building Based on this trip rate, the proposed protect would generate 777.41 trips per day. The protect proponent would be required to construct the necessary street improvements, as contained in the conditions of approval for the protect, and pay traffic impact fees as established by the City Council to off-set the incremental increase in traffic as a result of the protect b) Access to the site is provided by three, 30-foot driveways along Hyssop Drive and one, 36-foot driveway along 6`h Street. All driveways would allow full access without impeding the through traffic. c) Access for emergency vehicles is adequate with three, 30-foot driveways and one, 36-foot driveway d) The City of Rancho Cucamonga requires a parking ratio of one space per 250 square feet of office use, one space per 1,000 square feet for the first 20,000 square feet of warehouse use, one space per 2,000 square feet for 20,000 to 40,000 square feet of warehouse use, and one space per 4,000 square feet for over 40,000 square feet of warehouse use. Based on this ratio the protect requires a total of 234 spaces According to the City's Uniform Application Part 1, the proposed protect would provide 258 spaces, which is in excess of that required by City Code t ~ I Initial Study for DRC2002-00750, SUBTPM16010 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 11 e/f) The protect site is located on the southeast corner of 6'h Street and the I-15 Freeway. According to Exhibit III-7 of the City's General Plan, no bike lanes exist within the vicinity of the site Additionally, according to Exhibit III-13 of the City's General Plan, the site is not adtacent to any community trails. The new facility would not cause a hazard or barrier to pedestrians or cyclists because adequate points of ingress/egress have been provided. g) Located approximately 2.5 miles northeast of Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and would not be dangerous to users or aircraft. Potenl~aly $ignifiranl i Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentlelly imi~ n Signlhunl M~Ipebon Spnificenl No 1 ct Inco teE I n I C 7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result ~n impacts to. a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their () () (/) ( ) habitats (including, but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds)? b) Locally designated species (e.g ,heritage trees, () () () (/) eucalyptus windrow, etc.) c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g , () () () (/) eucalyptus grove, sage scrub habitat, etc.) d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian, and () () () (/) vernal pool) e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors () () () (/) Comments: a) The site is within the Ontario Habitat Recovery Unit for the Delhi Sands Flower-Loving Fly (DSF) as identified within the US Fish & Wildlife Service Final Recovery Plan for the DSF dated September 14, 1997. In August 2001, Ecological Sciences performed a Focused Delhi Sands Flower-loving Fly Habitat Survey for the site. No DSF were observed during the focused surveys Additionally, no other sign of recent DSF occupancy was detected (e.g pupal skins) Abundance and diversity of sand inhabiting insects was much lower than would be expected on undisturbed Delhi sands formations Further, plant species indicative of potential DSF habitat were not detected Given the lack of important DSF indicator species, the low overall diversity and abundance of other sand inhabiting species typical of undisturbed Delhi sand ecological communities, and the absence of DSF during the 2001 DSF flight season, the subtect property does not currently support a DSF population. The site is not located adtacent to an area known to support DSF. The nearest recent occurrence of DSF is located several miles south of the site. Further, based on information from off-site field visits, consultation with other entomologists, and results of other DSF surveys conducted in the general area, the 2001 DSF flight season was apparently "productive" relative to the above ground activity period for DSF • B,D~~ Initial Study for DRC2002-00750, SUBTPM16010 • City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 12 b-c) The only tree on site is a walnut tree, which is not considered a heritage tree according to the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance Removal of the tree would not create a significant impact. Proposed development includes landscaping in accordance with the City's Development Code. d) There is no riparian or wetland habitat on-site. e) The presence of bordering streets and scattered development within the area has eliminated any wildlife corridors that may have occurred in the past. Poieneelly Sgnificant Impel Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Pwentally unless TNan Significant Mibgaean Significant Na Im ect Ineo ate0 Im ct I ed 8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposaL• a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation () () () (/) plans • b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and () () () (/) inefficient manner? c) Result in the loss of availability of a known () () () (/) mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? Comments: a-b) The protect would be required to conform to applicable City standards for energy conservation. c) The protect site is located on the Day Creek alluvial fan, an area classified as a Mineral Resource Zone (MRZ-2). An MRZ-2 zone contains deposits of known value and marketability However, the State Geologist has determined that the area is not a Designated Area of available resources due to urbanization. Potenaalry Significant Impact Lass Issues and Supporting Information Sources PpteniWly unless man Sgnificant Mnigauon Sigmhcent No Im ad Inca ate0 I p I act 9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of () () () (/) hazardous substances (including, but not limited to od, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)v b) Possible interference with an emergency () () () (/) response plan or emergency evacuation plan 8t ~ f Initial Study for DRC2002-00750, SUBTPM16010 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 13 Potanlially Significant Impact Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources' Potanlmly unless roan Significant Mrtigaaon S~gn~ficanl No Im C Into eleE I C I cl c) The creation of any health hazard or potential () () () (/) health hazard d) Exposure of people to existing sources of () () () (/) potential health hazards e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable () () () (/) brush, grass, or trees? Comments• a/d) During a recent site visit, no hazardous materials storage or usage was noted. No evidence of improper hazardous disposal was observed, and no stained or discolored drams, catch basins, drip pads, or sumps were observed. Development of the site, would not expose people or the environment to existing sources of hazardous materials • a) All proposed driveways provide adequate access for emergency vehicles. Fire hose/extinguisher locations must be approved per Fire Department. All on-site streets provide appropriate turn radii for emergency vehicles. The prolect site is . within a developing industrial area, and significant amounts of vegetation do not occur within the area. b) The proposed prolect includes the subdivision of 7 4 acres of land into five parcels and construction/operation of five concrete tilt-up industrial buildings with two related office buildings totaling 117,790 square-feet Proposed operations including warehousing and distribution would not expose people or the environment to any known potential health hazards. e) The site is located in an industrial area and is not located in a brush/wildland fire hazard area PMenbally Significant Impaol Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources. PotantWllr unless roan Significant Mlllgaaon Sgnifirant No Im m Inw atatl I n I ect 10. NOISE. Will the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels () () (/) ( ) b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels () () () (/) Comments• a-b) The prolect would increase noise levels since the site is currently vacant and the development would add people and traffic to the area The site is within an area designated General Industrial and noise from the proposed prolect would be u b , D ldo • Initial Study for DRC2002-00750, SUBTPM16010 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 14 consistent with noise levels expected for the area. There are no sensitive receptors m the immediate vicinity of the site. Therefore there is no impact. Construction related short-term noise levels could be higher than existing ambient noise levels in the protect area, but would cease once construction of the protect is completed. The impact is considered less than significant as no sensitive receptors occur within the protect vicinity. aam~bfiy Sgmficenl Imp9a Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Paeaiely unless Than Slgmhwa Mnigetlan Sgnifiwni No Impea Incoryoraletl Impea Impact 11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon or result rn a need for new or altered government services rn any of the following areas: a) Fire protections O O O (/) b) Police protections O O O (/) c) Schools () () () (/) d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads () () () (/) e) Other governmental services () () () (/) Comments: a-e) Fire Protection -The site is located on the southeast corner of 6th Street and I-15 Freeway and is served by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. The nearest fire station is located on the southwest corner of Jersey Boulevard and Milliken Avenue, less than one-mile northwest of the protect site. The District is responsible for evaluating the protect through the City's Development Review and Growth Management process. The proposed protect would include structural fire protection standards contained in the Uniform Fire Code Therefore, no mitigation is required Police protection -Police Protection for the area is provided under a contract with the County Sheriff's Department All industrial buildings would include standard security devices such as lighting, and locks on all doors/gates Additional police protection is not required as the addition of 117,790 square-feet of mdustnal buildings would not have a substantial increase in the area to be patrolled as the protect site is small, at 7 4 acres, in proportion to the existing surrounding development. f._~ Schools -The proposed protect would generate new fob opportunities The City of Rancho Cucamonga has been a housing rich community since incorporation Development of mdustnal uses would allow the City to reach a fobs/housing balance by providing fobs for the local population Jobs created by this and other similar protects would likely draw employees from within the City or surrounding communities Therefore, the effect on school districts would be less than significant ~ , ©~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2002-00750, SUBTPM16010 Page 15 Public facilities -The proposed protect would generate additional truck traffic in the vicinity The applicant of this protect must pay afair-share of the cost of local road improvements, through the City's Transportation Development Fee Potentielty Significant Impel Legs Issues and Supporting Information Sources Pwennellr unless roan Spn~ficant Milpeaon SlgnMCant No Im ecl Into etetl I d 1 n 12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result rn a need for new systems or supplies or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gasp () () () (/) b) CommurncaUon systems O O U (/) c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution () () () (/) facihties~ d) Sewer or septic tanks () () () (/) e) Storm water drainages O O O (/) f) Solid waste disposals () () () (/) g) Local or regional water supplies () () () (/) Comments: a-g) The proposed protect includes the construction/operation of five concrete tilt-up industrial buildings and two office buildings totaling 117,790 square feet. Development at the currently vacant site would require extension of existing utilities available in the immediate area Utility systems installed to serve existing development within the area are adequate, and would not regwre mator modifications or alterations Solid waste disposal would be provided by the current City contracted hauler The protect would increase demand upon storm drain systems due to the increased runoff from new hardscape and roof tops proposed The site plan includes the construction of a new storm drain catch basin near the southwest comer of the site. A Final Drainage Plan is required by the City Engineer to address protected storm flows. Implementation of the approved plan would make this impact less than significant. Palenbalty Spnificant Impap Le99 Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potenaally unle99 roan Sgnificant I.Liigauon Spn~fiwnt No I d Into atetl 1 p I q 13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal• a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect O O O (/) O O O (/) 4jt~ ~V Initial Study for DRC2002-00750, SUBTPM16010 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 16 Paenimlty Significant Impaa Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Paenluly unless Then Significant Mingeam 9gn~finmt No I n Inco eletl I n I n c) Create light or glares O O (/) ( ) Comments• a-b) The protect site is not located along a scenic highway or vista. The protect site and surrounding area is designated General Industrial Existing and future buildings within the protect area will be of similar concrete tilt-up design. The proposed industrial buildings will be in accordance with design criteria established in the City's Development Code, Chapter 17.30 Industrial Districts Landscaping would be in accordance with approved plans and would buffer site activity. The impact is considered less than significant c) Development of the site would create a new light source as the site is currently vacant LighUglare proposed on site would be consistent with light sources from existing industrial development in the area The impact is not considered significant. Paenaeay Sgmficant p Issues and Supporting Inionnation Sources Paenlmnr ~ ~ T~ SpniLeant Mrtigahan Sgnifioant No I n Into ateE I a I a 14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal a) Disturb Paleontological resources () () () (/) b) Disturb archaeological resources () () () (/) c) Affect historical or cultural resources () () () (/) d) Have the potential to cause a physical change, () () () (/) which would affect unique ethnic cultural values e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses wthin O O O (/) the potential impact area Comments• a-e) The site is on an alluvial fan, an environment not generally associated with fossils. According to the City's Master Environmental Assessment the site was not identified as containing historic or cultural resources Additionally, the site is located in a developed area and to date, no resources have been uncovered in the vicinity of the protect site. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated to occur PolantWlly Significant Impact Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources WMlentlellr unleaa roan SigmM1Cant Mi0ga0on Sgn~ficanl No I an Inco eteC Im en Im n 15. RECREATION. Would the proposal P~, D ~°I Initial Study for DRC2002-00750, SUBTPM16010 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 17 Poteni~eey S~gndirant Ingen less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Polentielly unless men Spnihcent Mrtigaeon Sl~ifiwnt No I n I tea I n I n a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or () () () (/) regional parks or other recreational facilities b) Affect existing recreational opportunities () () () (/) Comments• a) The development of the site includes construction/operation of five industrial buildings with two related office buildings totaling 117,790 square feet End use of the proposed building would include warehousing and distribution. The number of people to be employed at the facility is currently unknown Industrial building of similar size and use within the City, generally require 25 to 30 employees. Jobs created by this and other similar protects would likely draw employees from within the City or surrounding communities. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has been a housing rich community since incorporation. Development of industrial uses would allow the City to reach a fobs/housing balance by providing fobs for the local population The addition of these employees would not increase demand for neighborhood or regional parks as they would likely be hired from within the City or surrounding communities. b) The proposed protect would not affect existing recreational opportunities, as the site is located on the southeast corner of 6'" Street and the I-15 Freeway within an industrial developed area There are no existing or proposed recreational opportunities within the vicinity of the site. Poteneelly SignRCent Inpen Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Pmentblly unless rnen S~pndirant Mrtigaeon Sign~firant No Im act Inco ete0 Im n Im ect 16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Potential to degrade: Does the protect have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the mator periods of California history or prehistory? O O (/) O C~ g, D ~ • Initial Study for DRC2002-00750, SUBTPM16010 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 18 aaea~alry Sgnifiamt Issues and Supporting Information Sources FalenOa~ly u~ss Tne Significant Mitigedon Signifieenl No I an Inca rated Im n I n b) Short term: Does the protect have the potential () () (/) ( ) to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time. Long-term impacts will endure well into the future ) c) Cumulative: Does the protect have impacts that () () () (/) are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a protect are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past protects, the effects of other current protects, and the effects of probable future protects.) d) Substantial adverse: Does the protect have () () () (/) environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly Comments: a) The site is within the Ontario Habitat Recovery Unit for the Delhi Sands Flower- Loving Fly (DSF) as identified within the US Fish & Wildlife Service Final Recovery Plan for the DSF dated September 14, 1997 In August 2001, Ecological Sciences performed a Focused Delhi Sands Flower-loving Fly Habitat Survey for the site. No DSF were observed during the focused surveys. Additionally, no other sign of recent DSF occupancy was detected (e g pupal skins) Abundance and diversity of sand inhabiting insects was much lower than would be expected on undisturbed Delhi sands formations Further, plant species indicative of potential DSF habitat were not detected Given the lack of important DSF indicator species, the low overall diversity and abundance of other sand inhabiting species typical of undisturbed Delhi sand ecological communities, and the absence of DSF during the 2001 DSF flight season, the subtect property does not currently support a DSF population The site is not located adtacent to an area known to support DSF. The nearest recent occurrence of DSF is located several miles south of the site. Further, based on information from off-site field visits, consultation with other entomologists, and results of other DSF surveys conducted in the general area, the 2001 DSF flight season was apparently "productive" relative to the above ground activity period for DSF • b) The Initial Study identified short-term impacts to air quality with development of the protect site. However, the short-term impacts would occur due to proposed construction activities and will not exceed established thresholds The impacts would cease once construction activities are completed Implementation of ~,,D ~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2002-00750, SUBTPM16010 Page 19 mitigation measures presented in this Irntial Study would ensure that short-term impacts would remain less than significant levels. c) The proposed protect is consistent with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan that was recently adopted along with the certification of a Program EIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Consideration for significant adverse environmental effects of bwid-out in the City and sphere of influence. The Cary made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and casual resources. Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources, however they would not reduce impacts to less than significant levels. As such, the City adopted statements of overndmg consideration balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Gwdelines Section 15092 and 15096(h) These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use protects that wdl be pedestnan fnendly and conservation of valuable natural open space With these findings and statements of overndmg consideration, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is regwred d) Development of five industrial bwldings and two related office buildings totaling 117,790 square feet would not cause substantial adverse effects on humans, either directly or indirectly The initial study identified impacts to air quality as having a potentially significant affect to the environment. However, proposed mitigation measures would reduce the impacts to less than significant. i g, ~ ~-a Sent By: Planning Research Int'1,~ • 714 505 1670; Nov-20- 2 8:52PA1; Pege 2!3 Initial Study for DRC2002-00750. SUBTPM16010 EARLIER ANALYSES City of Rancno Cucamonga Page 20 Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEOA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by miUganon measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Cmc Center Drive (checlt all that apply)• {~) Maater Environmental Assessment and General Plen EIR -City of Rancho Cucamonga (Certrfied October 17, 2001) (~) General Plan -City of Rancho Cucamonga (Certified October 17, 2001) (-~ Development Code- City of Rancho cucemange (Adopted December 7, 19133, Revised June 1999) (~) Ecological Sciences, Focused Delhi Sands Flower-Loving Fly Surveys on Six Parcels (110 acres), City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, Calitomta, December 21, 2001. (~) Jim Borer Certrfied Arborist #496, Arborist Report, October 30, 2002. APPLICANT CERTIFICATION Print Name and Title• ~ 1 G ~. e rd K W J K LY ~ ~ r,,tst-~ e I cemy that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I adtnawledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures Further, I have revised the proleot plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mfvgate the effects to a point where clearly no significant ornnronmentel effeofs would occur. Signature !/ 7~ Date: ~ gt~~-3 City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review m accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.• Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16010 and Development Review DRC2002-00750 Public Review Period Closes. May 14, 2003 Project Name. Vineyards East Prolect Applicant: RKW Development Corporation Prolect Location (also see attached map). Located at the southeast comer of 6th Street and the I-15 Freeway-APN 229-283-08, 10, and 11 Project Description: The subdivision of 7 4 acres of land into 5 parcels and the related Development Review of five industrial buildings totaling 117,790 square feet in the General Industrial District (Subarea 14) FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an . Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: ^ The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment ® The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but (1) Revisions m the protect plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the protect as revised may have a significant effect on the environment If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report wdl not be required Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period. . Mav 14. 2003 Date of Determination Adopted By gt~ ~1 RESOLUTION NO 03-71 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16010, A SUBDIVISION OF 7 4 ACRES INTO 5 PARCELS IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 14), LOCATEDATTHE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF 6TH STREET AND THE I-15 FREEWAY, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN. 229-283-08, 10, AND 11 A Rentals 1 RKW development Corporation filed an application for approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16010, as descnbed m the title of this Resolution Hereinafter m this Resolution, the subject Tentative Parcel Map request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the December 11, 2002, and continued to January 8, February 26, March 26, Apnl 23, and May 14, 2003, the Plamm~g Commission held a duly advertised public heanng for the above- descnbed map All legal preregwsites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Plamm~g Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth m the Rentals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng on December 11, 2002, and January 8, February 26, March 26, Apnl 23, and May 14, 2003, including wntten and oral staff reports, together v~nth public testimony, this Commission hereby spenfically finds as follows a The application applies to three parcels of land on 7 4 acres of land located at the southeast comer of 6th Street and the I-15 Freeway, and The applicant proposes to subdivide the land into five parcels, and c The property to the east of the subtect site is vacant, the properties to the north and south are improved with industnal bwldmgs, and the property to the west is the I-15 Freeway, and d The property is vacant and has occasionally been disn:d for weed control, and e The property is located within the City's designated Delhi Sands flower-lowng fly habitat zone, and Access into the site is from 6th Street or Hyssop Dnve, and . g Accompanying this application is a proposal to construct five industnaU manufactunng bwldmgs (DRC2002-00750) d, ~ ~5 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 03-71 SUBTPM16010 - RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION May 14, 2003 Page 2 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng and upon the specific findings of facts set forth m paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a The Tentative Parcel Map is consistent month the General Plan and Development Code, and b The design or improvements of the Tentative Parcel Map is consistent v~nth the General Plan and the Development Code, and The site is physically swtable for the type of development proposed, and d The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable m~ury to humans and wildlife or their habitat, and The Tentative Parcel Map is not likely to cause senous public health problems, and f The design of the Tentative Parcel Map will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property v~nthin the proposed subdivision 4 Based upon the facts and mfonnation contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, togetherv~nth all wntten and oral reports included forthe environmental assessment for • the application, the Planning Commission finds that there ~s no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitonng Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA gwdelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Decaretion and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained ~n said Mitigated Negative Decaretion with regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the protect is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project, which are listed below as conditions of approval c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considenng the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigation Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed probed will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources orthe habitat upon which v~nldlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained m the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the mfonnation provided to the Planning Commission dunng the public heanng, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, . this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every cond~Uon set forth below Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorp(or~ated(~he~rein by this reference 8 1 J 'lQ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 03-71 SUBTPM16010 - RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION . May 14, 2003 Page 3 Enameennn Droision 1) All street frontages shall be improved mGuding, but not limited to curbs and gutters, sidewalks, dnve approaches, street lights, street trees, sigrnng, stnpmg, etc., and as required Hyssop Dnve is a Gty Industnal Local street, 6th Street is a City Malor Diwded Artenal west of Charles Smith and Malor ArtenaUSecondary east of Charles Smith. The transition from Major Divided Artenal to Major/Secondary is subject to Traffic Engineer approval 2) Complete the south side of 6th street inGudmg parkway under the freeway The parkway may be a 4 5-foot vnde curb adjacent sidewalk If the bodge abutment interferes, then a speGal design shall be submitted to Gty for consideration 3) Improvements to 6th Street shall include removal and reconstruction of existing ac pavement to centerline of the street 4) Provide appropnate improvements for proper transdions and loirnng of existing improvements 5) Obtain nght-of--way on the south side of 6th Street from easterly Ime of proposed Lot 1 to Hyssop Dnve and install the improvements Permanent improvements are eligible for developer-to-developer reimbursement The reimbursement shall be processed within sut months of the improvements being accepted by the City Counal or nght to reimbursement shall tertrnnate 6) The transportation fee credit and/or reimbursement may be utilized for 6th Street improvements The exact limits of improvements eligible shall be determined dunng plan check consistent with the backbone concept. 7) Commercial dnveway shall be 35 feet minimum per City Standard 6) The developer shall obtain a Caltrans encroachment pertmt poor to issuance of budding permits Environmental Mitigation Water 1) Pnor to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan that identifies Best Management Practices to be implemented dunng the penod the site is under construction Best Management Practices shall be identified on the Grading Plans for review and approval by the City Engineer • Arr Quality 1) The site shall be treated wrath water or other sod-stabdizmg agent (approved by South Coast Air Quality Management Distract and the ~ ~ 0 r}~- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 03-71 SUBTPM16010 - RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION May 14, 2003 • Page 4 Regional Water Quality Control Board) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with South Coast Air Quality Management Distract Rule 403 2) Streets adjacent to the site shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated wrath vehicle traclung of sod off-site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site dunng such episodes. 4) Chemical sod stabilizers (approved by South Coast Air Quality Management Distract and the Regional Water Quality Control Board) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PMio emissions 5) The construction contractor shall select the construcbon equipment used on-site based on low emission factors and high-energy effiaency The construction contractor shall ensure the Construction Grading Plans inGude a statement that all construction egwpment well be tuned and maintained in accordance wrath the manufacturers' specifications. 6) The construction contractor shall utilize electnc or clean alternative fuel i powered equipment where feasible 7) The construction contractor shall ensure that Construction Grading Plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipmentwhen not in use 8) If the rndustnal buildings associated with Development Review DRC2002-00750 are constructed concurrently wrath the industnal buildings associated wrath Development Review DRC2002-00751, the contractor shall use low volatile organic compound paints sprayed over a penod of 65 days The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF MAY 2003 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Larry T McNiel, Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary gj t ~ ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 03-71 SUBTPM16010 - RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION . May 14, 2003 I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of May 2003, by the follovwng vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS Page 5 NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS V~ ~ T1 City of Rancho Cucamonga . MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16010 and Development Review DRC2002-00750 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified m the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed protect. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained m the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect 2 A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible gwdelmes. As monitoring . progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management -The MMP will be m place through all phases of the protect. The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The protect planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept m the protect file with the department having the original authority for processing the protect Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address• City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Diwsion 10500 Crnc Center Drive . Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Fj t ~ ~~ Mitigation Monitonng Program SUBTPM16010 and DR2002-00750 • March 26, 2003 Page 2 3 Appropnate specialists wdl be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed, as deterrnined by the protect planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropnate wntten approvals to the protect planner 4. The pro/ect planner or responsible City department wdl approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Forrn. After each measure is venfied for compliance, no further action is regwred for the speafic phase of development. 5 All MMP Reporting Fonns for an impact issue requmng no further monitonng wdl be signed off as completed by the pro/ect planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form 6 Unantiapated circumstances may apse requmng the refinement or addition of mitigation measures The protect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions An MMP Reporting Form wdl be completed by the protect planner or responsible Citydepartment and a copy provided to the appropnate design, construction, or operational personnel 7 The protect planner or responsible City department has the authonty to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occumng afterwntten notification has been issued. The protect planner or responsible City department also has the authonty to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occumng. The protect planner or responsible City department has the authonty to hold issuance of a business license unLl all mitigation measures are implemented 8 Any conditions (mitigation) that regwre momtonng after protect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division The Division shall regwre the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City These funds shall be used bythe City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the regwred penod of time In those instances requmng long-term pro/ect monitonng, the applicant shall prowde the City with a plan for monitonng the mitigation actvities at the pro/ect site and reporting the momtonng results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporter as an mdiwdual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented The momtonng/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner pnor to the issuance of budding permits ~~ l~ 1 D ~~ MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: SUBTPM16010 & DRC2002-00750 Applicant: RKW Develooment Coraoration Initial Study Prepared by: Warren Morellon Date: November 18, 2002 nP 1!. • .. ... -. -• .. . r .2~~,rSt c ^YF,yfl ~` rt ~ Water Y ,'f'~'fir,„~~°i u`;~~.11 ` ' " t ~ ,~'~ ~,e `, ' '"t „n . ,„ ~ s y {y Pnor to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall prepare a CE C Review of Plans A/D Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan that IdentiFles Best 2 Management Practices to be Implemented during the period the site Is under construction Best Management Practices shall be identified on the grading plans for rewew and approval by the City Engineer ~ . ~ ~'~~ Air Quality -?~.t>~ -'i~ ~~~~~ h~;~i~,' ." $ ~ a~ ~ a~~ - .mow,.. "~,~ , ~ ., . . - ~ • rte,, ~~. . The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent CP C (approved by South Coast Nr Quality Management District and the Rewew of Plans C 2 Regional W ater duality Control Board) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with South Coast Fur Quality Management District Rule 403 Streets adjacent to the site shall be swept according to a schedule CP C Review of Plans C 2 established by the City to reduce PM,a emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of censtruction Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed CP C Rewew of Plans C 2 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the sRe during such episodes Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by South Coast Air Quality CP C Review of Plans C 2 Management Oistnct and the Regional Water duality Control Board) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain Inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce: PM,o emissions The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment CP B Rewew of Plans C 2 used on-site based on low emission factors and high~nergy effiaenuy The construction contractor shall ensure the ConsWcdon Grding Plans Include a statementthat all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturers'speGfications The construction contractor shall utilize electricor ctean alternativefuel CP C Rewew of Plans C 2 powered equipment where feasible The consWction contractor shall ensure that Construction Grading CP B Review of Plans C 2 Plans mctude a statement that work crews will shut oR equipment when not in use 1 J Key to Checklist Abbreviations u Re`spOnSible PBfAOrI - ~ ~ ~'` ,' '.s. IYlonttoringlFrequen~ey ~?{ bc4',s" ... vw ~c+r .,xwaxa ", £4 Method at Verification y ~~ ,nust~:~mmsr . ~?i„ .Qt SenctlonsN``~~; ~:c ` '' ~ ~_F= x4rt.wrz~m:. ~..n -1.r 'T , CDD -Community Development Director or designee A • With Each New Development A - On-site Inspection 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map CP -City Planner or designee B - Pnor To ConsWcdon B -Other Agency Permit I Approval 2 -Withhold Grading or Bulding Permit CE -City Engineer or designee C -Throughout ConsWCbon C -Plan Check 3 - Withhotd Certificete of Occupancy BO -Building Official or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submdtal (Reports I Sludles I Plans) 4 -Stop Work Order PO -Police Captain or designee E - Operatin8 5 -Retain Depositor Bonds FC - Fue Chief or designee 6 -Revoke CUP IN W COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENy STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: SUBTPM16010 SUBJECT: SUBDIVISION OF 7 4 ACRES OF LAND INTO 5 PARCELS APPLICANT: RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LOCATION: SOUTHEAST CORNER 6TH STREET AND I-15 FREEWAY ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements coin lehon D 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, _/_/_ its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or rn the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be regwred by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense (without applicant's reimbursement) in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of its other obligations under this wndition 2 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 03-71, Standard _/_/_ Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved rn the construction/grading activities and are not regwred to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect B. Time Limits 1 This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning _/_/_ Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which _/_/~ include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file rn the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations SC-08-02 1 iJ I D ~ ` Project No SUBTPM16010 Completion Data 2. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, bulding, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 3 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable Ctty Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance 4 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits D. Landscaping 1 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subtect to Ctty Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Droision 2 Special landscape features such as mounding along 6th Street 3 Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this protect area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 4 On protects which abut the I-15 Freeway, the developer shall provide landscaping within the freeway right-of-way along the boundary of this protect or pay an to-lieu of construction cash deposit The landscape and irrigation plans shall be prepared in conformance with Caltrans and City Standards through the City of Rancho Cucamonga Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and City Engrneer Landscape and irrigation shall be installed prior to the release of occupancy of the protect If final approvals and/or installation are not complete at that time, the City will accept a cash deposit for future landscaping of the Caltrans right-of-way E. Environmental Mitigation measures are required for the protect The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be regwred to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $719 00 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions regwred by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit F. Other Agencies The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of budding permits • J-~_ ~-f_ -J___/- _/__1_ ~~- ~~- -~~_ ___/_~_ -~-~- SC-08-02 2 t ~ ~~ Protect No SUBTPM16010 Comoletion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) G. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans Including the following ~_/_ a Site/Plot Plan, b. Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, includtng isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and av conditioning, and g Planning Drnsion Protect Number (i e., TT #, CUP #, DR #, etc) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils ~~_ report Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "weY signature are required prior to plan check submittal 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation ~_/ coverage to the City pnor to permit issuance 4 Separate permits are requred for fencing and/or walls ~_J_ 5 Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by ~~_ the Bwlding and Safety Division H. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be _/~_ marked with the protect file number (i e , SUBTPM2002-16010) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development protect ~_/_ or mafor addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Bwlding and Safety Division prior to permits issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tracVparcel map _/~_ recordation and prior to issuance of bwiding permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday ~_/~ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays sc-os-oz 3 d , D ~~ Protect No SUBTPM16010 Comolehon Data 5 Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Division's public ~ _/~_ counter) 6 The following is required for side yard use for increase in allowable area _/_/_ a Prowde a reduced site plan (8 ~/z" x 11 "), which indicates the non-bwldable easement b Recorded °Covenant and Agreement for the Maintenance of a Non-Bwldable Easement," which is signed by the appropriate property owner(s) I. New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the Califomia Budding Code (CBC) for property line clearances ~~_ constdenng use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Provide compliance with the California Bulding Code for required occupancy separations ~~_ 3 Prowde draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC ~~_ Section 1505 4 Exterior walls shall be constructed of the regwred fire rating m accordance with CBC ~~_ Table 5-A 5 Openings m exterior walls shall be protected m accordance with CBC Table 5-A ~~_ 6 Prowde smoke and heat venting to accordance with CBC Section 906 ~_/_ 7. Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional requvements may be needed ~J_ ~. Grading 1 Grading of the subtect property shall be in accordance with California Building Code, City ~~_ Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A sods report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of Caltfomia to _/~_ pertorm such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engmeer or geologist and submitted at ~_/_ the time of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, ~~_ submitted, and approved by the Bwldtng and Safety Official prior to the issuance of bwlding permits 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is regwred for all new construction protects and for ~~_ existing bwldings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a Calrforma registered Crvd Engmeer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: K. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured ~_/_ from street centerline) 44 feet total feet on 6th Street southerly fro Hyssop Drive westerly line to I-15 Freeway right- ~~_ of-way ~ SC-08-02 4 1 Protect No SUBTPM16070 Comoletion Date L. 2 Comer property Ilne cutoffs shall be dedicated per Clty Standards 3 Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of building permits, where no map is involved 4 Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map 5 The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property interests necessary to construct the required public improvements, and If he/she should fail to do so, the developer shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Sections 66462 and 66462.5 at such time as the City decides to acquire the property interests required for the improvements Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the City if the City decides to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection with the subdivision Security for a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the City, at developer's cost The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. This condition applies in particular, but not limited to 6th Street Street Improvements All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb & Gutter AC. Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr Street Lights SVeet Trees Comm Treil Median Island Bike Troll Other 6th Street x x x x x x H sso Drive x x x x x x Improvement Plans and Construction Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first Prior to any work being pertormed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits regwred Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer _f-/- J~ ~___/- -/~- ~~- ~~~ ~~- _/~. ~~ SC-0&02 5 y 1 Y ~~ Protect No SUBTPM16010 Completion Date d Signal condwt with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or . reconstruction protect along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer 2) Condwt shall be 3-inch (at intersections) or 2-Inch (along streets) galvanized steel with pull rope or as specfied e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per Clty Standards or as dvected by the Clty Engineer. f Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be Installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots 4 Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be Installed per City Standards In accordance with the Citys street tree program 5 Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed legend and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans Where public landscape plans are required, tree Installation In those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans • The Clty Engineer reserves the right to adtust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional information, contact Laura Bonaccorsi at extension 4023 Min Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Grow Spacing Size' Gty Space 6th Street Magnolia grandiflora NCN 8' 30' O C 15 gal °Ma estic Beau " Hyssop Drive Brachychiton Bottle Tree 5' 25' O C 15 gal o ulneus 'TREES SHALL BE 15-GALLON SIZE UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans 2) Pnor to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may regwre backfill soil amendments, as determined by the Clty inspector 3) All street trees are subtect to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Division 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the Clty Engineer for conformance with adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all protect Intersections, including driveways Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have Imes of sight plotted as required A permit shall be obtained from Caltrans for any work within the following right of-way 6th Street at I-15 Freeway SC-08-02 6 ~ ~ 9 -~i~ ~~- ~-~- ~-~- ~~- ~~- -~~_ _/~. Project No SUBTPM16010 Comolehon Date M. Public Maintenance Areas and Li htin t L d h ~~! g g an scape e appropria e 1. A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form t Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of bwlding permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer N. Drainage and Flood Control 1 A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final ~J_ map approval or the issuance of bwlding permits, whichever occurs first All drainage facilities shall be installed as requred by the City Engineer. 2 Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surtace drainage entering _/~_ the property from adjacent areas 3. Public storm drain easements shall be graded to convey overtlows in the event of a blockage ~~_ in a sump catch basin on the public street. O. Utilities 1 Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, ~-J- gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as required 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary _/~_ 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requvements of the ~~_ Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fve Protection Distract, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of • compliance from the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district wdhin 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdmsion or prior to the issuance of permrts in the case of all other residential projects 4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved _/~_ Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any regwrements that may be received from them P. General Requirements and Approvals 1 An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided poor to final map approval or ~_/_ issuance of bwlding permits, whichever occurs fvst, for ail lots 2 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for ~_/_ all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to bwlding permit issuance if no map is involved APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: D. Security Lighting 1 All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power. ~_/_ These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell sc-oa-oz ~ Q~ ~~ ~0 Project No SUBTPM76070 Completion Date • R. 2 All bwldings shall have minimal secunty lighting to eliminate dark areas around the butldtngs, with direct lighting to be provided by all entryways Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development 3 Lighting in exterior areas shall be to vandal-resistant fixtures Security Hardware One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors If windows are within 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used S. 2 All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices Security Fencing All businesses or residential communities with secunty fencing and gates will provide the police with a keypad access and a unique code The initial code is to be submitted to the Police Cnme Prevention Unit along with plans If this code is changed due to a change to personnel or for any other reason, the new code must be supplied to the Police via the 24- hour dispatch center at (909) 941-1488 or by contacting the Cnme Prevention Unit at (909) 477-2800 extension 2474 or extension 2475 T Building Numbering Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective far nighttime visibility 2 Developer shall paint roof top numbers on one or more roofs of this development They shall be a minimum of three feet to length and two feet in width and of contrasting color to background The stencils for this purpose are on loan at the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED i ~~. ~_~_ ~~. ~-~. _~-~ -~-~- -/~_ SC-OB-02 8 ~ 1 ~ "\ FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT FIRE SAFETY DIVISION STANDARD CONDITIONS FD PLAN REVIEW#: FD-02-00821 PROJECT #: DRC2002-00750 and TPM16010 PROJECT NAME: Vineyard East DATE: October 30, 2002 PLAN TYPE: APPLICANT NAME: OCCUPANCY CLASS: FLOOR AREA (S): TYPE CONSTRUCTION: FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM REQUIRED: LOCATION: FD REVIEW BY: PLANNER: CommerclaUlndustnal and TPM RKW _Group S Largest 27 512 s f (5 Buildings on this site) Type V-N with 15 Steve Locatl Flre Protection Planrnng Specialist Warren Morelion FIRE DISTRICT USE ONLY Outstanding Fire District Issues Status - "Cleared° when regwred information is entered below. None ALL OF THE FOLLOWING TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMENTS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. THOSE PORTIONS OF THE PLANS COVERED BY COMMENTS IN SECTIONS B THROUGH E ARE CONSIDERED INCOMPLETE AS NOTED. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2770, EXT. 3009, TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING: PLEASE CONSIDER THIS PROJECT "INCOMPLETE" UNTIL ITEMS IN SECTIONS "B" THROUGH "E" ARE CORRECTED OR ADDRESSED A. Outstanding Fve Distract Completeness Issues Affecting Approval of Protect 1. There are no outstanding Fire District "completeness" items for this project. Any conditions, comments, or corrections are technical m nature and shall be addressed prior to issuance of regwred permits or a certificate of occupancy as indicated. B. Fire District Fees 1. No Fees Due: All fees due at this time have been paid. ~ t ~ °la • • C. Commundy Facilities Distracts Annexation 1 There are no Fire District annexation issues for this project. It is located within an existing Community Facilities District for fire protection D. Available Water Supply 1 There are no Fire District water supply or fve flow issues for this project based on one of the following: a The regwred verification of available water supply has been received The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distract WaterAvadabtl~ty for Fire Protection Fonn has been completed by the Water Distract and submitted to the Fire Safety Division, or b The ro ect does not re wre roof of available water su I or additional fire flow E. Fire Distract Access Issues to Be Addressed immediately t No Access Problems: There are no outstanding "incompleteness" items related to FD access for this protect For outstanding technical issues see below RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT- STANDARD CONDITIONS & REQUIREMENTS - General, Procedural, Technical, or Operational Information that shall be Included, Corrected, or Completed as noted below. The following are applicable to this project: FSR-1 General Requirements for Public and Private Water Supply 1 General Guidance for Fve Hydrants: The following provides general guidance for the spacing and location of fire hydrants Remember these are the maximum permitted distances between fire hydrants a The maximum distance between fire hydrants in commerciaUindustrial protects is 300-feet No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire hydrant. For cut-de-sacs the distance shall not exceed 100-feet b Fire hydrants are to be located 1 At the entrance(s) to a protect from the existing public roadways This includes subdivisions and industrial parks 2 At intersections. 3 On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible 4 As regwred by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs 5 The location of fire hydrants is based upon the operational needs of the Fire Distract to control afve 6 Fve hydrants shall be located a minimum of forty (40) feet from any building Contact the Fue Safe Division 909 477-2770 2 Minimum Fire Flow with Automatic Fire Sprinklers: The regwred minimum fve flow for this protect is 2250 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch This flow reflects a 50 percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire sprinkler system with central station monitoring This regwrement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as amended, and Fve Distract Ordinances and Standards 3 Hydrants Used to Supply Fire Flow: Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radws of the proposed protect may be used to provide the required fire flow subtect to Fue District review and approval Private fire hydrants on adtacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow Contact the Fire Safet Division 909 477-2770 C7~ V ~~ FSR-2 Prorate (On-Site) Water and/or Fire Sprinkler Underground Plans for Fire Protection 1 Exceeds Allowable Distance: When any portion of a faality or building is located more than 150-feet from a fire hydrant located on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility or burfding, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the requred fire flow shall be provided The distance is measured as vehicular path of travel on access roadways, not line of sight Contact the Fve Safety Division (909) 477-2770 2 Number of Fire Hydrants Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow or fraction thereof, subfect to standard spaang and distribution requirements Contact the Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770 3 Fire Sprinkler Underground: Prior to the issuance of a fire sprinkler system permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground to the Fire Safety Division for approval Contact the Fve Safety Division (909) 477-2770 FSR3 Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems- Technical Comments 1 Required Installations: Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance 15 or other adopted code or standard, requires an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in any of the following• a Commercial or industrial structures greater than 7,500 square feet Contact the Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770 FSR-4 Flre District Slte Access- Technical Comments 1 Private Roadways and Fire Lanes: The minimum specfications for private fire district access roadways are a The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet b. The inside firm radius shall be 20-feet c. The outside firm radus shall be not less than 50-feet d The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet e The mirnmum vertical clearance is 14 feet, 6 inches f At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet g The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9 degrees or 20 percent h The maximum grade of the driving surtace shall not exceed 12% i Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW) 2 Access Doorways: In addition to any exterior opemng regwred by the Building or Fire approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided as follows a In buildings without high-pled storage, one or more approved access doors shall be provided in150 lineal feet or major fraction thereof along the exterior wall that faces regwred access roadways or walkways b In bwldings with high-piled storage one or more approved access doors shall be provided in each 100 lineal feet or mafor fraction thereof, of the exterior wall that faces required access roadways When a railroad siding is installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fve Distract ' access to all re wired o enin s Contact the Fire Safe Dmsion at 909 477-2770 3 Access Walkways. Approved access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all regwred building exterior openings r1 L J • 4 Vegetation: Trees and shrubs planted in any median shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14-feet, 6- mchesfrom the ground up, so as not to impede fire vehicles Contact the Fire Safety Drvision (909) 477- 2770 5. Fire Lane Identification: All required fire lanes shall be identified by red curbing and signage A drawing of the proposed signage that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be submitted to and approved Contact the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District at (909) 477-2770 for a copy of the FD Fve Lanes standard SCR-10 Hazard Control Permits- Technical Comments The below indicated permit requrements are based on those permits commonly associated with the protects operations or budding construction As noted below Special Permits may be regwred, dependent upon approved use(s) the applicant must contact the Fire Safety Division for speafic information Note: Carefully review the Items below. There may be significant impact on the proposed project. Italicized text indicates a Rancho Cucamonga Fire District amendment. 1 General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not speafically described below, which in the tudgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property 2 To install any access control device, system, or any material under, upon or wdhm the regwred fire d~stnct access roadway. This includes any gate, barrier, traH~c-calming dewce, speed bump, speed hump or any dewce that delays, slows, or restricts Fire D~stnct response 3 High pled combustible storage 4 Pallets Idle storage, handling, repair, or manufacturing of combustible pallets m excess of 100 units at any one site. FSR-11 Hazardous Materials -Compliance with Disclosure and Reporting Regulations The San Bemardmo County Fire Department shall review your Busrness Emergency/Contingency Plan for compliance with minimum standards Contact the San Bernardino County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-8400 for forms and assistance The County Fire Department is the CaVEPA Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Certificate of Occupancy Restrictions: If the facility is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by Bwlding and Safety will not be finalized until the San Bemardmo County Fire Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan California Government Code, Section 65850 2 prohibits the City from issuing a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting specific hazardous material disclosure requirements A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be regwred if regulated substances are to be used or stored at the new faality Contact County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-8400 for forms and assistance 2 Rental or Lease Properties: Any business that operates on rented or leased property, and is required to submit a Plan, is regwred to submd a notice to the owner of the property in writing stating that the business is subtect to the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan mandates, and has complied with the provision, and must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within 5 working days after receiving a request from the owner. 3 Fire District Code Adoption: The Fve Code adopted by the Fire District has a provision regwring collection of information regarding hazardous materials at facilities for purposes of Fve Code implementation and emergency response FSR-12 Plan Submittal Required Notice Requred plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 1997/98 Bwlding, Fire, Mechanical, and Plumbing Codes, 1999 Electrical Code, Health and Safety Code, Public Resources Code, and RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD32, Gwdelines and Standards ~,9 ~S NOTE In addition to the fees due at this time please note that separate plan check fees for tenant improvements, fire protection systems and/or any consultant reviews wdl be assessed at time of submittal of plans. FSR-14 Alternate Materials and Methods The Fire Safety Diwsion wdl review requests for attemate materials and methods within the scope of our authority The request must be submitted on the Fve District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents Contact the Fire Safety Diwsion at (909) 477-2770 for assistance PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMIT- For Each Development Phase 1 Fire District Site Access Plan: Prior to the issuance of any grading permit the applicant shall submit a Fire Distract Site Access Plan to the Fire District for revew and approval The following, minimum information and detail shall be included a on a scaled site plan: a All roadways shall be clearly indicated Including roadway width, vertical clearances, cul-de-sac width, turn radu, curb cuts, angle of departure, grades, etc b. For private roadways or drive aisles less than 40-feet or less in width where parking may be permitted, identify the location of proposed fire lanes c Include a note stating all required fire lanes shall be identified by red curbing and signage d Include detail(s) to identfy which of the methods set forth in the Fire District "Fve Lane" standard wtll be used to mark the fve lane A copy of the Fve Distract "Fve Lane" Standard can be obtained by calling (909) 477-2770. e Roadway with a width of more than 40-feet parking is permitted on both sides f Roadway with a width of 32-feet or more parking is permitted on one side only. g The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9 degrees or 20 percent. h. The grade of any fve distract access roadway shall not exceed 12 percent i It water plans have been approved, include fve hydrant, control valves, and fve department connection locations If water plans are not approved fve hydrant, control valves, and fve department connection locations shall be mcluded on the Final Site Access Plan Contact the Fve Safe Dmsion at 909 477-2770 for assistance PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS- Complete the following: 1. Private/On-site Fve Hydrants: Prior to the issuance of any bwldmg permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, specrfications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for rewew and approval by the Fve Distract Pions and installation shall comply with Fve Distract standards Contac the Fve Safety Division for a copy of "Fve District Notes for Underground and Water Plans "Contact the Fve Safety Diwsion (909) 477-2770 2 Private Fire Hydrants/On-site Installation: All private on-site fve hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable pnor to delivering any combustible bwldmg matenals on-site (i a ,lumber, roofing matenals, etc) A representative of Fve Construction Services shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The budder/developer shall submit final test and inspection report to the Fve Safety Dmsion Contact Bwlding and Safety/Fve Construction Services (909) 477-2713 3 Public Fire Hydrants: Prior to issuance of any budding permit, the applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fve hydrants for the review and approval by the Fve District and the Water Distract On the plan show all existing fve hydrants within a 600-foot radws of the protect Contact the Fve Safety Dnnsion (909) 477-2770 4 Public Installation: All requred public fve hydrants shalt be installed, flushed, and operable prior to deliverng any combustible bwldmg materials on-site (i a ,lumber, roofing matenals, etc) Water Distract personnel shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The bwlder/developer shall submit a copy of the Water District inspection report to the Fve Safety Division Contact Water District to schedule testin • ~tU ~~Q 5 Building Use Letter- Required Letter. Prior to the issuance of any bulding permits, the applicant shall submit a detailed letter of intended use for each building on-site to the Fue D~str~ct for review and approval A form that may be used to meet this requirement is attached at the end of the Fire District comments Contact the Fire Safety Droision (909) 477-2770 PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION- Complete the following: 1 Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distract and City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, °Installahon of Reflective Hydrant Markers." On private property these markers are to be maintained in good condition by the property owner Contact Bwlding and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) a77-2713 2 Private Fire Hydrants- Final Acceptance: For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional test of the on-site fire hydrants shall be conducted by the bwlder/developer in the presence of the Water District or Fire Construction Services, as appropriate The bwlder/developer shall submit the final test report to the Fire Safety Division. 3 Fire Sprinkler System- Plans and Permit: Plans for the regwred automatic fve sprinkler system shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for review and approval No work is allowed without a Fire Construction Services permit Contact Bulding and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713. 4 Fire Sprinkler System- Final Inspection: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fve Construction Services Contact Bulding and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 5 Sprinkler Monitoring The fire sprinkler system monitoring system shall be installed, tested, and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system Monitoring is regwred wdh 20 sprinklers in Group I Occupancies, or 100 or more sprinklers in all other Occupances Contact Bwlding and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713. 6 Access ControUl-raffic Calming Device Permit A Fire District permd is regwred to install any access control device, trafficcalming device, or gate on any access roadway Applicable CC&R's, or other approved documents, shall contain provisions that prohibit obstructions such as traff~ccalming devices (speed bumps, humps, etc ), control gates, bollards, or other modrfications in fire lanes or access roadways without prior written approval of the Fire District, Fve Safety Division 7. Knox Rapid Entry System: A Knox rapid entry key vault shall be installed prior to final inspection Proof of purchase shall be subm~ted prior to final bulding plan approval Contact the Fire Safety Dmsion for specrfic details and ordering information Contact Bulding and Safety/Fve Construction Services (909) 477-2713 for inspection 8 Construction Access: Fire District access, a minimum 26-feet in width and 14-feet, 6-inches minimum clear height shall be provided These minimum clearances shall be maintained free and clear of any obstructions at all times, in accordance with Fire District Standards Contact the Fire Safety Dmsion (sos> a77-2770 9 Site Directory: A bulding or sde directory shall be provided, as noted below a Lighted directory within 20-feet of each primary entrance to the site The site directory shall be constructed, located, and installed in accordance with Fire Safety Dvision Standards Contact the Fire Safet Division at 909 477-2770 10 Fire Lanes. Prior to the issuance of any Certrficate of Occupancy, the fire lanes shall be installed in accordance with the approved fire lane plan The CC&R's or other approved documents shall contain an approved fire lane map and provisions that prohibit parking in the fire lanes The method of enforcement shall be documented The CC&R's shall also identrfy who is responsible for not less than annual inspection and maintenance of all regwred fire lanes Contact Bulding and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 ~~~ ~~ 11 Address- Other Than Single-family: New buildings other than single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness When the bulding setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street an additional non-illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance Contact Building and Safety/Fve Construction Services (909) 477-2713 12 Multi-unft Complexes: In multi-unit complexes approved address numbers, and/or bulding identrfication letters shall be provided on the front and back of all unds, suites, or buldings The Fire District shall review and approve the numbering plan in coordination with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 13 High-pile Combustible Storage-Permit: The applicant is requred to obtain a Fve District Permit for Storage of High-pile Combustible material Contact the Fire Safety Dvision (909) 477-2770 14 High-pile Combustible Storage- Plans: The applicant shall submit plans for the storage arrangement to Fire Construction Services. The applicant shall submit detailed plans and a Commodity Analysis report to Fire Construction Services for approval If the occupancy classrfication for the bulding is designated as Group S, Division 2, commodities stored shall be limited to light hazard classrfication only Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 15. Business Emergency/Contingency Plan: The applicant shall submit a Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for emergency release or threatened release of hazardous materials and wastes or provide a letter of exemption Contact the County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials/Emergency Response and Enforcement Division at (909) 387-8400 16 Submittal to the Fire District: Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy a copy of the County Fire Department approved Business Emergency/Contingency Plan -New Business (Hazardous Materials Release Response Plans and Inventory) shall be submitted to the Fve Distract In some cases additional information that is not in the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan may be required in order to support local fire prevention and emergency response programs Contact Fire Safety Dvision (909) 477-2770. 17 Required County Permits: The applicant shall be required to apply for one or more of the following Hazardous Materials Handler Permit, a Hazardous Waste Generator Permit, an Aboveground Storage Tank Permit, and/or an Underground Storage Tank Permit Contact the County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials Dmsion/Fve Services Section at (909) 387-3080 18 Risk Management Plan: The applicant must demonstrate that the facility has met or is meeting all Risk Management Plan (RMP) regwrements if regulated substances are to be handled at the faality Contact the County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials/Emergency Response and Enforcement Division at (909) 387-8400 19 Fire District Confidential Business Occupancy Information: The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District °Confidential Business Occupancy Information" Fonn and submit to the Fire Safety Division This form provides contact information for Fire D~stnct use in the event of an emergency at the subiect building or property Contact Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770 Fire District Preliminary Review Letter -Template SL 10/10/02 Revision U • • ~, , D a~ • RESOLUTION NO 03-72 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO DRC2002-00750, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF 5 INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS ON 7 4 ACRES OF LAND IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 14), LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF 6TH STREET AND THE I-15 FREEWAY, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 229-283-08, 10, AND 11 A Rentals 1 RKW Development Corporation filed an application for approval of DRC2002-00750, as descnbed in the tale of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application " 2 On December 11, 2002, and continued to January 8, February 26, March 26, Apnl 23, and May 14, 2003, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the application 3 All legal prerequisites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution . NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Plannng Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby spenfically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Rentals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenn:d meeting on December 11, 2002, and January B, February 26, March 26, Apnl 23, and May 14, 2003, including wntten and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby speafically finds as follows a The application applies to the development of five industnal/manufactunngbuililings on 7 4 acre acres of land at the southeast comer of 6th Street and the I-15 Freeway, and b The property to the east of the subject site rs vacant, the properties to the north and south are improved v~nth industnal buildings, and the property to the west is the I-15 Freeway, and The properly is vacant and has occasionally been disced for weed control, and d The property is located wnthin the City's designated Delhi Sands flower-loving fly habitat zone, and Access into the site is from 6th Street or Hyssop Dnve, and f The property abuts the I-15 Freeway to the west, and g Accompanying this application is a proposal to subdivide the three-parcel site into five parcels (Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16010) ~t~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 03-72 DRC2002-00750 - RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION May 14, 2003 Page 2 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced meeting, including wntten and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specrfically finds and concludes as follows a That the proposed protect is consistent with the obtectives of the General Plan and development Code, and b. That the proposed design is m accord vwth the obtectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the d~stnct m which the site ~s located, and c That the proposed design is m compliance vvith each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code, and d That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, well not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or matenally intunous to properties or improvements m the vicinity • 4 Based upon the facts and mforrnation contained m the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all wntten and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the probed will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negatwe Declaration and Monitonng Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the • findings as follows: a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared incompliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA gwdelmes promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the mfortnation contained m said Mitigated Negative Declaration wrath regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Decaretion identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the protect is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect which are listed below as conditions of approval c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the Cal~fom~a Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considenng the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the probed, there is no evidence that the proposed probed vnll have potential for an adverse impact upon vwldlife resources or the habdat upon which vnldlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained m the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission dunng the public heanng, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth m Section 753 5(o-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations 5 Based upon the findings and contusions set forth m paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subted to each and every conddion setforth below . and m the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference ~t~ 1~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 03-72 DRC2002-00750 - RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION May 14, 2003 Page 3 Engmeenna Division 1) All street frontages shall be improved inGudrng, but not limited to curbs and gutters, sidewalks, dnve approaches, street lights, street trees, signing, stnping, etc ,and as required Hyssop Dnve is a City Industnal Local street, 6th Street rs a City Mator Divided Artenal west of Charles Smith Avenue and Mator ArtenaUSecondary, east of Charles Smith Avenue The transition from Malor Divided Artenal to Mayor/Secondary rs subject to Traffic Engineer approval 2) Complete the south side of 6th street including parkway under the freeway The parkway may be a 4 5-foot wide curb adjacent sidewalk If the bodge abutment interferes, then a speual design shall be submitted to City for consideration 3) Improvements to 6th Street shall include removal and reconstruction of ewsting ac pavement to the centerline of the street 4) Provide appropnate improvements for proper transitions and joining of ewsting improvements 5) Obtain nght-of-way on the south side of 6th Street from easterly Ime of proposed Lot 1 to Hyssop Dnve and install the improvements. Permanent improvements are eligible for developer-to-developer reimbursement. The reimbursement shall be processed Hnthin sor months of the improvements being accepted by the City Counal or nght to reimbursement shall terminate 6) The transportation fee credit and/or reimbursement may be utilized for 6th Street improvements The exact limits of improvements eligible shall be determined dunng plan check consistent Huth the backbone concept 7) Commeroial dnveway shall be 35 feet minimum per Gty Standard 8) The developer shall obtain issuance of building permits Caltrans encroachment permit poor to Environmental Mitigation Water 1) Pnor to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan that identifies Best Management Practices to be implemented dunng the penod the site is under construction Best Management Practices shall be identified on the Grading Plans for review and approval by the City Engmeer ~ r~ ~D~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 03-72 DRC2002-00750 - RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION May 14, 2003 Page 4 Air Quality 1) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-stabd¢ing agent (approved by South Coast Air Quality Management Distnct and the Regional Water Quality Control Board) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, m accordance v~nth South Coast Air Quality Management Distnct Rule 403 2) Streets adjacent to the site shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City io reduce PM~o emissions assoaated vmth vehicle tracking of sod off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions from the site dunng such episodes 4) Chemical sod stabilizers (approved by South Coast Air Quality Management Distnct and the Regional Water Quality Control Board) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions 5) The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-site based on low emission factors and high-energy effiaency The construction contractor shall ensure the Construction Grading Plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturers' speafia3tions 6) The construction contractor shall utilize electnc or clean altemabve fuel powered egwpment where feasible 7) The construction contractor shall ensure that Construction Grading Plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not rn use 8) If the mdustnal buildings assoaated with Development Review DRC2002-00750 are constructed concurrently with the mdustnal bwldings assoaated with Development Review DRC2002-00751, the contractor shall use low volatile organic compound paints sprayed over a penod of 65 days 6. The Sea~tary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF MAY 2003 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Larry T McNiet, Charnnan ~ , p 10'a PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 03-72 DRC2002-00750 - RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION . May 14, 2003 Page 5 ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of May 2003, by the following vote-to-mnt AYES• COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT. COMMISSIONERS L~ • v ~~ City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16010 and Development Review DRC2002-00750 This Mitigation Momtonng Program (MMP) has been prepared for use m implementing the mitigation measures identified m the Mitigated Negative Declaration fortheabove-listed protect. This program has been prepared m compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081 6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained m the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect 2 A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who will take action, what action wdl be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance wdl be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program Program Management -The MMP wdl be m place through all phases of the protect The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The protect planner oversees the MMP and rewews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department Procedures -The following steps wdl be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City m performing momtonng or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant 2. A MMP Reporting Form wtll be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified m the Mitigation Momtonng Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who will take action, what action wdl be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All momtonng and reporting documentation wdl be kept m the protect file with the department having the original authority for processing the protect. Reports wdl be available from the City upon request at the following address City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive • Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 d ~ ~ \0~ Mitigation Monitonng Program SUBTPM16010 and DR2002-00750 March 26, 2003 Page 2 3 Appropnate speaalists wdl be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed, as determined by the protect planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation actvities and provide appropnate wntten approvals to the protect planner 4. The protect planner or responsible City department wdl approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is venfied for compliance, no further action is required for the speafic phase of development. 5 All MMP Reporting Forrns for an impact issue requmng no further monitonng wdl be signed off as completed by the protect planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Fonn 6 Unantiapated circumstances may anse requmng the refinement or addition of mitigation measures The protect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions An MMP Reporting Forrn will be completed bythe protect planneror responsible Citydepartment and a copy provided to the appropnate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7 The protect planner or responsible City department has the authonty to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occumng afterwntten notification has been issued The protect planneror responsible City department also has the authonty to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occumng The project planner or responsible City department has the authonty to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented Any conditions (mitigation) that require momtonng after protect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division The Division shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required penod of time 9 In those instances requmng long-term protect momtonng, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitonng the mitigation activities at the protect site and reporting the monitonng results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporteras an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented The momtonng/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner pnor to the issuance of building permits r1 lJ d (~ \~5 MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: SUBTPM16010 & DRC2002-00750 Applicant: RKW Development Corporation Initial Study Prepared by: Warren Morelion Date: November 18, 2002 . - -• .. Water ,-,x6y~,,f,((~ r $,g~~`+'>~i.-;yy. '~'~ k '~ ~ , ~~:r~ t ~~~ *d' ~ ~~. a,~; 'r~. '°fi?r#, 3~'li~_ ( ~1 at ` - d i-=Y1C i J ~ . W 641 ~¢r , VY • ,(r ~ rv.4L, +i Pnor to issuance of grading permits, the appllcent shall prepare a CE C Review of Plans AID 2 Storm Water Pollution Prevention Pian that identifies Best Management Practices to be Implemented dunng the penod the site is under censWdion Besl Management Practices shall be Identified on the grading plans for review and approval by the City Engineer Air Quality - '+: ~ 4+ .. h;+ ` .,i l- ` .- r : :~,y ~'., -,~ ~ #~ ~ i~ -~ >> r," ~r as s,.v ~~ i ~ ` , ` La ~ ~ ^,4 ~. «N.\ ~ y 1M1 W` ~ .~3' ~ (i1 )M„r' Ja~+ i+~s 9 ~ ~ The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilinng agent CP C Review of Plans C 2 (approved by South Coast Air Quality Management Distnd and the Regional Water Quality Control Board) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accerdance vnih South Coast /4r Quality Management Disind Rule 403 Streets adjacent to the sde shall be swept according to a schedule CP C Review of Plans C 2 established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions assoaated vnth vehicle tredong oisoil off-site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of censW ction Grading operetions shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed CP C Revew of Plans C 2 25 mph to minimize PM,a emissions from the site dudng such episodes Chemicel soil stabilizers (approved by South Coast !ur Quality CP C Review of Plans C 2 Management Distnct and the Regional Water Quality Control Board) shall be applied to all Inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,a emissions The construction centredor shall select the construction egwpmenl CP B Revew of Plans C 2 used on-site based on low emission fadors and high-energy effiaency The censWction centiador shall ensure the ConsWchon Greding Plans mdude a statement that ali mnsW chon equipment will be tuned and maintained m aawrdance with the manufadurers'speafiattlons The consWdion centredor shall utilize eledncor dean altemahvefuel CP C Rewtew of Plans C 2 powered egwpment where feasible The censWdion contractor shall ensure that Construction Grading CP B Rewew of Plans C 2 Plans mdude a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not In use i • Key to Checklist Abbreviations Responsible Person ~;'~° rt` . ~,dr " ~~~N~ _c" _r ~ "'IUIcot4orinQ~F"reuency '~ a:~rw .wx~~°wm yus #m' •u e. ~ ° .~~,~ r ~ poi o ~~ ~~,~y~~tm.;~~~~.;~°, „~- ~a a'.c.~x~Y 4,:n4x _~.>> CDD -Community Development Drredor or designee A -With Each New Development A - On-site Inspectlon t -Withhold Recordatlon of Final Map CP -City Planner or designee B - Pnor To ConsWchon B -Other Agency Permd I Approval 2 - Wlthhoid Gredmg or Budding Permd CE -City Engineer or designee C -Throughout Construction C - Pfan Check 3 -Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO - Bwlding Offiaal or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (Reports / Studies I Plans) 4 -Stop Work Order PO -Police Captain or designee E -Operating 5 -Retain Depositor Bonds FC -Fire Chief or designee 6 -Revoke CUP COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMEN] STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DRC2002-00750 SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT OF 5 INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS TOTALING 117,750 SQUARE FEET APPLICANT: RKW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LOCATION: SOUTHEAST CORNER 6TH STREET AND I-15 FREEWAY ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements coin lehon D 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, _/_/_ its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relingwsh such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be regwred by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at ds sole discretion, participate at rts own expense (wdhout applicant's reimbursement) m the defense of any such action but such partiapation shall not relieve applicant of its other obligations under this conddion 2 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 03-72, Standard _/_/_ Conditions, and ail envvonmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading actmties and are not regwred to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect B. Time Limits 1 Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or DevelopmenUDesign Review approval shall expire if _/_!_ bwldmg permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained m accordance with the approved plans which _/_/_ include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file m the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations ~ ~ \~ SC-08-02 1 ( Protect No DRC2002-00750 Comolehon Date 2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all ~ _/~_ Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code ~~_ and State Fve Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distract and the Bwlding and Safety Division to show compliance The bwidings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and bwlding elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/~_ submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bwlding permts 5 Ali site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for ~_/_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development ~~_ Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance 7 A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and _/_/_ approved by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building permts Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adtacent properties 8 Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards The final design, locations, _/~_ and the number of trash receptacles shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bwlding permits • 9 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall _/_/_ be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 10 All bwlding numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, _/~_ including proper illumination 11 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property _/_/_ owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of bwlding permits D. Bui lding Design 1 All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or _/_/_ protections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adtacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Division Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner Details shall be included in building plans 2 For commercial and industrial protects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main _/_/_ building colors C SC-08-02 2 `' 1 ~ \~ Protect No DRC2002-00750 Comole4on Date E. F. G. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1 All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long When a side of any parking space _/_/ abuts a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide 2 All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall _/_/_ ' contain a 12-inch walk adtacent to the parking stall (including curb) 3 Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be ~~_ provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses 4 Ali parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, _/~_ entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards 5 Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and _/_/_ Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of building permits For residential development, private gated entrances shall provide adequate turn- around space to front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public right-of-way 6 Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or ~_/_ more parking stalls Designate two percent or one stall, whichever is greater, of the total number of stalls for use by the handicapped 7 Motorcycle parking area shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more _/_/_ parking stalls Developments with over 100 parking stalls shall provide motorcycle parking at the rate of one percent The area for motorcycle parking shall be a minimum of 56 square • feet Trip Reduction 1 Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commercial, office, industrial, and multifamily ~~_ residential protects of more than 10 units Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the regwred automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater After the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces regwred are 2 5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2.5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike rack In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces required exceed 100 Where this results in a fraction of 05 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole number. 2 Carpool and vanpool designated off-street parking close to the bwlding shall be provided for _/_/_ commercial, office, and industrial facilities at the rate of 10 percent of the total parking area Ii covered, the vertical clearance shall be no less than 9 feet 3 For industral protects with at least 40 car parking spaces, bicyclist-changing facilities shall be _/_/_ provided to encourage bicycle commuting Accessible restrooms with storage lockers for clothing and egwpment shall be sufficient Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home _/_/ landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed ~ landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision - Protect No DRC2002-00750 2 Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19 08 110, and so noted on the grading plans The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods 3 A minimum of 20% of trees planted within industrial protects, and a minimum of 30% within commercial and office prolects, shall be specimen size trees - 24-inch box or larger 4 Wrthin parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls 5 Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of bwlding 6 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 7 All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thrrnng condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage 9 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the regwred landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be regwred by the Engineering Division 10 Special landscape features such as mounding Is regwred along 6th Street 11 Landscaping and irrigation systems regwred to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 12 Ail walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division 13 Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19 16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code 14 On projects which abut the I-15 Freeway, the developer shall provide landscaping within the freeway right-of-way along the boundary of this protect or pay an in-lieu of construction cash deposit The landscape and irrigation plans shall be prepared in conformance with Caltrans and City Standards through the City of Rancho Cucamonga Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and City Engineer Landscape and irrigation shall be installed Comolehon Date -~-~- _~~- ~~ -/-/- ~~. / / ~-~_ -/~- / / ~J- -~~- -/~- -/-/_ Protect No DRC2002-00750 Comole6on Date prior to the release of occupancy of the project If final approvals and/or installation are not complete at that time, the Ctty will accept a cash deposit for future landscaping of the Caltrans right-of-way. . H. Signs 1 The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this ~_/_ approval Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall regwre separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any signs 2 A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for City Planner review and ~~_ approval pnor to issuance of bwldmg permits I. Environmental 1 Mitigation measures are requred for the project The applicant is responsible for the cost of ~~_ implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $719 00 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory pertormance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forteit J. Other Agencies 1 The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and ~~~ location of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner rewew and approval pnor to the issuance of bwldmg permits APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) K. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following _/~_ a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) Includmg the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and av conditioning, and . Sc-o&o2 5 e,o ~~a Prgact No DRC2002-00750 Completion Dete g Planning Dmsion Protect Number (i e , TT #, CUP #, DR #, etc) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are regwred prior to plan check submittal 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance 4 Separate permits are regwred for fencing and/or walls 5 Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the Building and Safety Division L. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved pnor to construction All plans shall be marked with the prolect file number (i e , DRC2002-00750) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2. Prior to issuance of bulding permits for a new commercial or industrial development prolect or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division prior to . permits issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Bwlding and Safety Official after tracUparcel map recordation and prior to issuance of building permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays 5 Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Division's public counter) 6 The following is required for side yard use for increase in allowable area a Provide a reduced site plan (8 Yz° x 11 "), which indicates the non-bwidable easement b Recorded "Covenant and Agreement for the Maintenance of a Non-Buildable Easement," which is signed by the appropriate property owner(s) M. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fve-resistiveness 2 Provide compliance with the California Bwlding Code for required occupancy separations 3 Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions • 4 Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC Section 1505 5 Exterior walls shall be constructed of the regwred fire rating in accordance with CBC Table 5-A S~_ot~o2 6 ~ , Q ~\3 ~-/_ ~_/- ~-/- ~-/- ~~- ~~- ~~- ~~_ ~~- ~-/. -/-/- ~_/- / / ~-/_ ~~- Prgect No DRC2002-00750 Completion Date 6 Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC Table 5-A ~~_ 7 Provide smoke and heat venting in accordance with CBC Section 906 ~~~ S Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed ~~_ N. Grading 1 Grading of the subfect property shall be in accordance with California Budding Code, City ~_/_ Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to ~_J_ pertonn such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at ~~_ the time of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, ~~_ submitted, and approved by the Bwlding and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is requred for all new construction protects and for ~~_ existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a Cahforrna registered Civil Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLI ANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: . O. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured ~~_ from street centerline) 44 feet total feet on 6th Street southerly from Hyssop Drive westerly line to I-15 Freeway ~~_ right-of-way/ 2 Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards ~~_ 3 Reaprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or _/~_ by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of bwlding permits, where no map is involved 4 Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated ~~_ or noted on the final map 5 The developer shall make a good faith effort to acqure the required off-site property interests _/~_ necessary to construct the required public improvements, and if he/she should fad to do so, the developer shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Sections 66462 and 66462 5 at such time as the City decides to acquire the property interests required for the improvements Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the City if the City decides to acquire the off-site property interests regwred in connection with the subdivision Security for a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the City, at . developer's cost The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal This condition applies in particular, but not limned to 6th - Street sc.os-o2 7 ~ , 9 ~~a Protect No DRC2002-00750 Comolehon Date P. Improvement Plans and Construction a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the Clty Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required i Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch (at intersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified u Street Improvements All public Improvements (Interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limned to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb & Gutter AC Pvmt Side• walk Drive Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Treil Median Island Blke Trail Other 6th Street x x x x x x H sso Drive x x x x x x e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of Intersections per Clty Standards or as directed by the Clty Engrneer f Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to Ctty Standards, except for single family residential lots Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed peY City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program -~-~- ~-~_ / / ~~. ~_% ~~- /~. / / ~_~- SGO>3-ff2 8 ~ `~ ~\S Protect No DRC2002-00750 Completion Date 5 Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed legend and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans The City Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional information, contact Laura Bonaccorsi at extension 4023 Q. Min Grow Street Name Bofan(cal Name Common Name Space Spacing Size' Qty 6th Street Magnolia grandiflora NCN 8' 30' O C 15 gal °Ma estic Beaut ° Hyssop Drive Brachychiton Bottle Tree 5' 25' O C 15 gal o ulneus 'TREES SHALL BE 15-GALLON SIZE UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Division 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only 6 Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required 7 A permit shall be obtained from Caltrans for any work within the following right of-way 6th Street at I-15 Freeway Public Maintenance Areas A signed consent and waiver forth to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Distracts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer R. Drainage and Flood Control A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surtace drainage entering the property from adjacent areas Public storm drain easements shall be graded to convey overflows in the event of a blockage in a sump catch basin on the public street S. Utilities Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as required The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary -/~_ -~-~- i -~~- -~-~- ~~. / / ~~- _/_/~ -~~- SC-08-02 9 Qj t P ~\~ Prgect No DRC2002-00750 Completion Data 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requrements of the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential protects 4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them T. General Requirements and Approvals 1 An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to final map approval or issuance of bwlding permits, whichever occurs fvst, for all lots 2. Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: U. V W. X. Security Lighting All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell All bwldings shall have mammal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings, with direct lighting to be provided by all entryways Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures Security Hardware One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors If windows are within 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used 2 All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices Security Fencing All businesses or residential communities with security fencing and gates will provide the police with a keypad access and a unique code The initial code is to be submitted to the Police Crime Prevention Unit along with plans If this code is changed due to a change in personnel or for any other reason, the new code must be supplied to the Police via the 24- hour dispatch center at (909) 941-1488 or by contacting the Crime Prevention Unit at (909) 477-2800 extension 2474 or extension 2475 Building Numbering Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for rnghmme wsibdity ~~- -~-~- ~~. -~~ ~~- 1 / ~~- ~-/- ~_~_ ~~- -~-~- SC-08-02 10 ~j ' ~ \\ T Protect No DRC2002-00750 Completion Date 2 Developer shall paint roof top numbers on one or more roofs of this development They shall _/~_ be a minimum of three feet in length and two feet m width and of contrasting color to • background The stencils for this purpose are on loan at the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED sGO~o2 ~ ~ 9 ~~~ FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT FIRE SAFETY DIVISION STANDARD CONDITIONS FD PLAN REVIEW#: FD-02-00821 PROJECT #: DRC2002-00750 and TPM16010 PROJECT NAME: Vineyard East DATE: October 30, 2002 PLAN TYPE: CommerciaUlndustreal and TPM APPLICANT NAME: RKW Development Corporation OCCUPANCY CLASS: Group S FLOOR AREA (S): Largest 27,512 s f (5 Buildings on this site) TYPE CONSTRUCTION: Type V-N FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM REQUIRED: Automatlo Flre Sprinkler System with MOrtltOfing LOCATION: South of 6 btw Hyssop and Interstate 15 FD REVIEW BY: Steve Locate, Flre Protection Planneng Specialist FIRE DISTRICT USE ONLY Outstandlna Fire District Issues Status - °Cleared° when requered Information is entered below: None ALL OF THE FOLLOWING TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMENTS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. THOSE PORTIONS OF THE PLANS COVERED BY COMMENTS /N SECTIONS B THROUGH E ARE CONSIDERED INCOMPLETE AS NOTED. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2770, EXT. 3009, TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING: ~J PLEASE CONSIDER THIS PROJECT "INCOMPLETE" UNTIL ITEMS IN SECTIONS "B" THROUGH "E" ARE CORRECTED OR ADDRESSED A. Outstanding Flre District Completeness Issues Affecteng Approval of Protect 1 There are no outstanding Fire District "completeness" items for this protect. Any conditions, comments, or corrections are technical in nature and shall be addressed prior to issuance of required permits or a certificate of occupancy as Indicated. B. Fire District Fees 1. No Fees Due: All fees due at this time have been paid. 47tY ~~\ C. Community Facddies Distracts Annexation t. There are no Fire District annexation issues for this protect It rs located within an existing Community Facilities District for fire protection D. Available Water Supply t There are no Fire District water supply or fire flow issues for this project based on one of the following: a. The requred verification of available water supply has been received The Rancho Cucamonga Fve Protection District WaterAvadabdrtv for Fire Protection Form has been completed by the Water Distract and submitted to the Fire Safety Diwsion, or b. The ro ect does not re wre roof of available water su I or additional the flow E. Fve Distract Access Issues to Be Addressed Immediately 1 No Access Problems: There are no outstanding °incompleteness° dems related to FD access for this protect For outstanding technical issues see below RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT- STANDARD CONDITIONS & REQUIREMENTS - General, Procedural, Technical, or Operational Information that shall be Included, Corrected, or Completed as noted below. The following are applicable to this project: FSR-1 General Requirements for Public and Private Water Supply t General Guidance for Fire Hydrants: The following provides general guidance for the spacing and location of fire hydrants Remember these are the maximum penmtted distances between fire hydrants a The maximum distance between fire hydrants in commerciaVindustnal protects is 300-feet. No portion of the eMerior wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cut-de-sacs the distance shall not exceed 100-feet b Fire hydrants are to be located 1 At the entrance(s) to a protect from the existing public roadways This includes subdivisions and industraal parks 2 At intersections. 3 On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible. 4 As required by the Fve Safety Division to meet operational needs 5 The location of fire hydrants is based upon the operational needs of the Fire Distract to control afire 6 Fire hydrants shall be located a minimum of forty (40) feet from any bwlding Contact the Fire Safe Division 909 477-2770 2 Mmrmum Fire Flow with Automatic Fire Sprinklers: The requred minimum fire flow for this protect is 2250 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch This flow reflects a 50 percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire sprinkler system with central station monitoring This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as amended, and Fve District Ordinances and Standards 3 Hydrants Used to Supply Fire Flow: Public fire hydrants located wdhin a 500-foot radius of the proposed protect may be used to provide the required fire flow subtect to Fve District review and approval Private fire hydrants on adtacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow Contact the Fire Safe Division 909 477-2770 FSR-2 Private (On-Site) Water and/or Fire Sprinkler Underground Plans for Fire Protection 1 Exceeds Allowable Distance: When any portion of a faality or building is located more than 150-feet from a fire hydrant located on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the faality or bulding, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the regwred fve flow shall be provided The distance is measured as vehicular path of travel on access roadways, not Ime of sight Contact the Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770 2 Number of Fire Hydrants Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of regwred fue flow or fraction thereof, subject to standard spacing and distribution regwrements Contact the Fire Safety Droision (909) an-2no 3 Fire Sprinkler Underground: Prior to the issuance of a fve sprinkler system permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, and calculations for the fue sprinkler system underground to the Fire Safety Dmsion for approval Contact the Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770 FSR-3 Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems- Technical Comments 1. Required Installations: Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance 15 or other adopted code or standard, regwres an approved automatic fve sprinkler system to be installed in any of the following a Commeraal or industrial structures greater than 7,500 square feet Contact the Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770 FSR-0 Fire District Site Access- Technical Comments 1 Private Roadways and Fire lanes: The minimum specrf~cations for private fire distract access roadways are. a. The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet b The inside tum radius shall be 20-feet c The outside tum radius shall be not less than 50-feet d The minimum radus for cui~de-sacs is 45-feet e. The minimum vertical clearance is 14 feet, 6 inches f At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet. g The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9 degrees or 20 peroent h The maximum grade of the driwng surface shall not exceed 12% i Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW) 2 Access Doorways: In addition to any exterior opening required by the Bwlding or Fire approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided as follows a In buildings without high-piled storage, one or more approved access doors shall be provided in150 lineal feet or major fraction thereof along the exterior wall that faces required access roadways or walkways b In buildings with high-piled storage one or more approved access doors shall be provided in each 100 lineal feet or major fraction thereof, of the exterior wall that faces regwred access roadways When a railroad siding is installed provisions shall be made to maintarn Fire District access to all re cared o emn s Contact the Fire Safe Division at 909 477-2770 3 Access Walkways: Approved access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all regwred bwlding exterior openings 4 Vegetation: Trees and shrubs planted in any median shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14-feet, 6- inchesfrom the ground up, so as not to impede fire vehicles Contact the Fire Safety Dwision (909) 477- 2770 5. Fire Lane Identification: All regwred fve lanes shall be identrfied by red curbing and signage A drawing of the proposed signage that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be submitted to and approved Contact the Rancho Cucamonga Fue Protection District at (909) 477-2770 for a copy of the FD Fve Lanes standard SCR-10 Hazard Control Permits-Technical Comments The below indicated permit regwrements are based on those permits commonly associated with the projects operations or budding construction As noted below Special Permits may be regwred, dependent upon approved use(s) the applicant must contact the Fire Safety Dmsion for speafic infomtation~ Note: Carefully review the items below. There may be significant impact on the proposed project. Italicized text Indicates a Rancho Cucamonga Fire District amendment. 1 General Use Permit shall be regwred for any actwity or operation not specifically described below, which in the judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property 2 To install any access control device, system, or any material under, upon or within the regwred fire district access roadway This includes any gate, bamer, traffic-calming device, speed bump, speed hump or any device that delays, slows, or restricts Fire Distract response. 3. High pled combustible storage 4. Pallets Idle storage, handling, repay, or manufacturing of combustible pallets in excess of 100 units at any one srte FSR-11 Hazardous Materials -Compliance with Disclosure and Reporting Regulations The San Bernardino County Fire Department shall review your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for compliance with minimum standards Contact the San Bernardino County Fire, Hazardous Materials Dmsion at (909) 387-8400 for forms and assistance The County Fve Department is the CaVEPA Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Certificate of Occupancy Restrictions: If the facility is a NEW business, a Certrficate of Occupancy issued by Budding and Safety will not be finalized until the San Bemardino County Fve Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan California Government Code, Section 65850 2 prohibits the City from isswng a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting specific hazardous material disclosure regwrements A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be regwred if regulated substances are to be used or stored at the new facility Contact County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-8400 for forms and assistance 2 Rental or Lease Properties: Any business that operates on rented or leased property, and is regwred to submit a Plan, is regwred to submit a notice to the owner of the property in writing stating that the business is subject to the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan mandates, and has complied with the provision, and must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within 5 working days after recewing a request from the owner. 3 Fire District Code Adoption: The Fire Code adopted by the Fve District has a provision regwring collection of information regarding hazardous materials at facilities for purposes of Fire Code implementation and emergency response FSR-12 Plan Submittal Required Notice Regwred plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 1997/96 Bwlding, Fire, Mechanical, and Plumbing Codes, 1999 Electrical Code, Health and Safety Code, Public Resources Code, and RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD32, Gwdelines and Standards 1 J ~, ~ fl ~aa u • • NOTE In addition to the fees due at this time please note that separate plan check fees for tenant improvements, fire protection systems and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed at time of submittal of plans FSR-14 Altemate Materials and Methods The Fire Safety Division will review requests for alternate materials and methods within the scope of our authority The request must be submitted on the Fire Distract "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents Contact the Fire Safety Division at (909) 477-2770 for assistance PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMIT- For Each Development Phase 1. Fire District Site Access Plan: Prior to the issuance of any grading permit the applicant shall submit a Fire Distract Site Access Plan to the Fire District for review and approval The following, minimum information and detail shall be included a on a scaled site plan a All roadways shall be clearly indicated Including roadway width, vertical clearances, cul-de-sac width, turn radu, curb cuts, angle of departure, grades, etc b For private roadways or drive aisles less than 40-feet or less in width where parking may be permitted, identify the location of proposed fire lanes c Include a note stating all required fire lanes shall be identified by red curbing and signage d Include detail(s) to identify which of the methods set forth in the Fire District "Fire Lane" standard will be used to mark the fve lane A copy of the Fire Distract "Fve Lane" Standard can be obtained by calling (909) 477-2770 e Roadway with a width of more than 40-feet parking is permitted on both sides f Roadway with a width of 32-feet or more parking is permitted on one side only g The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9 degrees or 20 percent h The grade of any fire district access roadway shall not exceed t2 percent. i If water plans have been approved, include fire hydrant, control valves, and fire department connection locations If water plans are not approved fire hydrant, control valves, and fire department connection locations shall be included on the Final Site Access Plan Contact the Fire Safe Division at 909 477-2770 for assistance PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS- Complete the following: 1 Private/On-site Fire Hydrants: Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District standards Contac the Fire Safety Divisicn for a copy of "Fire District Notes for Underground and Water Plans "Contact the Fve Safety Division (909) 477-2770 2 Private Fire Hydrants/On-site Installation: All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable prior to delivering any combustible bwlding materials on-site (i e., lumber, roofing materials, etc) A representative of Fire Construction Services shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The bwlder/developer shall submit final test and inspection report to the Fire Safety Division Contact Bwlding and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 3 Public Fire Hydrants: Prior to issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and the Water District On the plan show ail existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radws of the protect Contact the Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770 4 Public Installation: All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable prior to delivering any combustible bwlding materials on-site (i a ,lumber, roofing materials, etc) Water District personnel shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The builder/developer shall submit a copy of the Water District inspection report to the Fire Safety Division Contact Water Distract to schedule testin ~v~v ~d~~ 5 Building Use Letter- Required Letter: Prior to the issuance of any bulding permits, the applicant shall submit a detailed letter of intended use for each building on-site to the Fire District for review and approval A form that may be used to meet this requirement is attached at the end of the Fire Distract comments Contact the Fve Safety Division (909) 477-2770 PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION- Complete the following: 1 Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway m accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Pian 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers " On private property these markers are to be maintained in good condition by the property owner Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 2 Private Fire Hydrants- Final Acceptance: For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional test of the on-sde fire hydrants shall be conducted by the builder/developer m the presence of the Water Distract or Fve Construction Services, as appropriate The builder/developer shall submit the final test report to the Fire Safety Division 3 Fire Sprinkler System- Plans and Permit: Plans for the regwred automatic fire spnnkler system shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for review and approval No work is allowed without a Fve Construction Services permit. Contact Bulding and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 4. Fire Sprinkler System- Final Inspection: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fue sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fve Construction Services Contact Bulding and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 5 Sprinkler Monitoring The fire spnnkler system monitoring system shall be installed, tested, and operational immediately following the completion of the fire spnnkler system Monitoring is regwred with 20 sprinklers m Group I Occupancies, or 100 or more sprinklers in all other Occupancies Contact Butldmg and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 6 Access ControUTraffic Calming l>evrce Permit A Fire Distract permrt is required to install any access control device, trafficcalming device, or gate on any access roadway Applicable CC&R's, or other approved documents, shall contain provisions that prohibit obstructions such as traff~ccalming devices (speed bumps, humps, etc ), control gates, bollards, or other modrfications in fire lanes or access roadways without prior written approval of the Fire District, Fire Safety Division 7 Knox Rapid Entry System: A Knox rapid entry key vault shall be installed prior to final inspection Proof of purchase shall be submitted poor to final bulding plan approval Contact the Fire Safety Division for specrfic details and ordering information Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 for inspection 8 Construction Access: Fire Distract access, a minimum 26-feet in width and 14-feet, 6-inches minimum clear height shall be provided These minimum clearances shall be maintained free and clear of any obstructions at all times, in accordance with Fire Distract Standards Contact the Fire Safety Division (909)477-2770 9 Site Directory: A building or site directory shall be provided, as noted below a Lighted directory within 20-feet of each primary entrance to the site The site directory shall be constructed, located, and installed in accordance with Fire Safety Division Standards. Contact the Fve Safe Division at 909 477-2770 10 Fire Lanes• Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire lanes shall be installed in accordance with the approved fire lane plan The CC&R's or other approved documents shall contain an approved fire lane map and provisions that prohibit parking in the fire lanes The method of enforcement shall be documented The CC&R's shall also identify who is responsible for not less than annual inspection and maintenance of all regwred fve lanes Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 d~D~aa 11 Address- Other Than Single-family: New buildings other than single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness When the building setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street an additional non-illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 12 Mutti-unit Complexes: In multi-unit complexes approved address numbers, and/or bulding identification letters shall be provided on the front and back of all unds, suiles, or buldings The Fire District shall review and approve the numbering plan in coordination wilh the Cily of Rancho Cucamonga Contact Budding and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 13 High-pile Combustible Storage-Permit: The applicant is required to obtain a Fire D~stnct Permd for Storage of High-pile Combustible material Contact the Fve Safety Division (909) 477-2770 14. High-pile Combustible Storege- Plans: The applicant shall submil plans for the storage arrangement to Fire Construction Services The applicant shall submit detailed plans and a Commodity Analysis report to Fue Construction Services for approval If the occupancy classilication for the bulding is designated as Group S, Division 2, commodities stored shall be limded to light hazard classrfication only Contact Bulding and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 15. Business Emergency/Contingency Plan: The applicant shall submil a Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for emergency release or threatened release of hazardous materials and wastes or provide a letter of exemption Contact the County Fve Department, Hazardous Materials/Emergency Response and Enforcement Dvision at (909) 387-8400 16 Submittal to the Fire District: Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy a copy of the County Fire Department approved Business Emergency/Contingency Plan -New Business (Hazardous Materials Release Response Plans and Inventory) shall be submitted to the Fve District In some cases additional information that is not in the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan may be requred in order to support local fire prevention and emergency response programs Contact Fve Safety Division (909) 477-2770 17 Required County Permits: The applicant shall be requred to apply for one or more of the following Hazardous Materials Handler Permit, a Hazardous Waste Generator Permit, an Aboveground Storage Tank Permd, and/or an Underground Storage Tank Permit Contact the County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials Division/Fire Services Section at (909) 387-3080 18 Risk Management Plan: The applicant must demonstrate that the facility has met or is meeting all Risk Management Plan (RMP) regwrements if regulated substances are to be handled at the facility Contact the County Fve Department, Hazardous Materials/Emergency Response and Enforcement Division at (909) 387-8400. 19 Fire District Confidential Business Occupancy Information: The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distract "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" Form and submit to the Fire Safety Division This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subfect bwlding or property Contact Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770 Fire District Preliminary Review Letter -Template SL 10/10/02 Revision g, , p ~a5 T H E C I T Y O r RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE: May 14, 2003 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, Clty Planner BY Nancy Fong, AICP, Senior Planner SUBJECT: MODIFICATION NO 2 TO DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRCDR01-04 - AMERICAN BEAUTY DEVELOPMENT CO - A request to modify the pattem of residential uses for the planning area west of Day Creek Boulevard and south of Church Street, modify vanous graphics, and add Design Guidelines for multi-family and commercial development within the Vlctona Arbors Master Plan, generally bounded by Base Line Road, Church Street, Day Creek Channel, Foothill Boulevard, and Etiwanda Avenue - APN~ 0227-161-28, 31, 33, 35, 36 and 38, 0227-171-08, 11, 12, 20, 22, 23, and 25; 0227-201-04, 13 thru 18, 22, 28 thru 31, 33 and 36, and 0227-211-40 BACKGROUND: In February 2001, the City Council approved the Master Plan and the subdivision for Victoria Arbors. Currently, the City and the developer, through the formation of a Community Facilities Distnct, began grading and Installing the mayor infrastructure such as drainage, utilities, and the new Day Creek Boulevard. According to the developer, the single-family portion of the Master Plan has been sold to Standard Pacific and U.S Homes. Recently, staff received house product proposals for several phases of the single-family protect. The developer also stated that there are buyers for the planning area west of Day Creek Boulevard, south of Church Street and they have plans for multi-family and commercial development The potential developers for the multi-family development are Fairfield Development and D R Horton. The potential developer for the commercial development is Regency Group To accommodate future development proposals, adtustments to the mixed use pattem and adding design cntena for this planning area would be needed, which necessitates the modification to the Master Plan. ANALYSIS: A Prooosed Chanoes to the Plannino Area West of Dav Creek Boulevard. The Planning Area in question is located west of Day Creek Boulevard between Church Street and Foothill Boulevard (Exhibit "A") The approved land use mix shows a Mixed Use Commercial block at the corner of Foothill and Day Creek Boulevards, a Mixed Use Commercial or Medium High (18-24 dwelling units per acre) resldentlal block along Day Creek Boulevard, Mixed Use Medium-High residential or High Density Senior Housing and Mixed Use Low-Medium to Medium (4-10 dwelling units per acre) residential blocks ITEM E PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRCDR01-04 -AMERICAN BEAUTY DEV CO May 14, 2003 Page 2 west of the commercial block The developer proposes changes to the land use pattern (Exhibit "B") and as follows • Change the Mixed Use Medium-High (18-24 dwelling urnts per acre) or High Density Senior Housing residential block to Mixed Use High (24-30 dwelling units per acre) • Change the Mixed Use Commeraal or Medium-High (18-24 dwelling units per acre) residential blocks to Mixed Use High (24-30 dwelling unts per acre) • Change the Mixed Use Low-Medwm or Medwm (4-10 dwelling units per acre) residential block to Mixed Use Low-Medwm or Medium (4-14 dwelling urnts per acre). • Change the northern Mixed Use Commeraal or Medwm-High (18-24 dwelling units per acre) residential block to Mixed Use Medwm or Medwm-High (8-24 dwelling units per acre) According to the developer, the reason for the proposed change from Medwm-High to High residential is that the potential buyer, Fairfield Development, intends to develop an apartment protect with a density of approximately 24 22 urnts per acre, which exceeds the maximum density range for Medwm-High (18-24 dwelling units per acre) The proposed change would modify the land use mix acreage within the Victoria Arbors Master Plan The commercial acreage will be reduced from approximately 50 to 25 6 acres while the multi-family residential acreage will be increased from 22 4 acres of Medwm-High residential (18-24 dwelling urnts per acre) to 46 6 acres of High residential (24-30 dwelling units per acre) A rewew of the Regional Center Mixed Use Block in the General Plan is regwred in order to determine whether the proposed change is consistent with the General Plan It is discussed in the section below B Consistency with the General Plan Regional Center Mixed Use Block The Victoria Arbors Master Pan is part of the area identified in the General Plan as the "Regional Center Mixed Use Block " This block includes the Victoria Gardens Master Plan, the winery parcel, the Pierotti parcel, and the block within the Etiwanda Specific Plan (Exhibit "A") The purpose of the Mixed Use designation for this block is to stimulate and guide development that is tailored to the Regional Center The land use mix in the Mixed Use Block speafies the uses and range of development for each land use category Table III-4 shows the permitted land uses, the range of acreages and percentages for the permitted land uses and the "most case" dwelling urnt scenario (Exhibit "D") The reasons for the range is to allow flexibility in achieving a variety of densities and housing types with the intent of creating a truly contemporary urban complex on a par with the best practices in urban design The following are staff findings on comparing the proposed changes to this Table The range of acreage for multi-family is between 77 to 153 acres and the "most case" scenario is 98 acres The current acreage for multi-family based on the approved Master Plan is 41 acres (22 4 Victoria Arbors and 18 54 Victoria . Gardens) With the proposed changes from Victoria Arbors, the acreage for multi- family is increased to 65 acres (46 6 Victoria Arbors and 18 54 Victoria Gardens) The increase in acreage is still within the range allowed under the General Plan PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRCDR01-04 -AMERICAN BEAUTY DEV CO May 14, 2003 Page 3 • The range of dwelling units for multi-family is between 1,078 and 2,142 with the "most case" scenario at 1,372 dwelling urnts The total of the potential dwelling units with the proposed changes in Victoria Arbors is 1,668, which exceeds the "most case" scenario but is still within range • The single-family acreage and units for the General Plan "most case" scenario and the approved Victoria Arbors Master Plan are different The General Plan "most case" scenario shows 32 acres (208 urnts) while Victoria Arbors has 181 acres (709 unts) • The General Plan range of acreage and units for total residential is 107 to 185 acres and 1,206 to 2,398 units The total residential acreage based on the proposed changes is 246 acres, which exceeds the top range of 185, however, the total 2,377 residential units is still within the range • The General Plan percentage mix for residential land uses is three-fourths multi-family and one-fourth single-family while Victoria Arbors including the proposed changes and together with Victoria Gardens is more like one-fourth multi-family and three-fourths single-family The City Counal has long adopted a housing policy of a mix of 35 percent multi-family and 65 percent single-family Therefore, the Victoria Arbors proposed changes are consistent with this policy. Based on the above analysis, staff believes the proposed changes are consistent with the multi-family mix of this Regional Center Mixed Use Block However, staff believes that there is a need to adtust this table so that the General Plan and the actual approved master plans are consistent with one another Staff antiapates forwarding a General Plan Amendment for Planning Commission consideration in July C Changes to Various Graphics and Addition of Design Gwdehnes for Multi-famdv and Commeraal Development Because of the proposed changes to the residential pattern and the related circulation system, the base maps are changed The changes regwre revisions to the Master Plan and the various pages of Chapter 2 (Community Structure and Design Concepts), and Chapter 5 (Community and Recreation and Open Space), (Exhibit "C") Other changes to the Master Plan include extending private greenway/paseo through the residential developments and to the regional trail, and adding written criteria that reference the Development Standards and Design Gwdelmes of the Development Code that will apply to the Victoria Arbors Master Plan The Master Plan will also include additional written and graphic Design Gwdelmes that depict the character, style, and quality of multi-family and commercal development D Design Review Committee The Design Review Committee (McNiel, Stewart, and Coleman) reviewed the proposed changes to the Master Plan on April 1, 2003, and recommended approval subtect to the conditions One condition is to provide buffering between single-family and multi-family development, and between commercial and residential development Second is that the design of multi-family development shall not have buildings that line up along the streets or exhibit a rigid orientation pattern The site design should have a campus like setting with generous open space Appropriate conditions have been placed in the Resolution of Approval ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRCDR01-04 -AMERICAN BEAUTY DEV CO May 14, 2003 Page 4 E Environmental Assessment Staff has reviewed the proposed modifications in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Gwdelines promulgated thereunder and determined that no subsequent or supplement Environmental Impact Report or mitigated Negative declaration is required to be prepared per Section 15602 of the CEQA Gwdelmes CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public heanng in the Inland Vallev Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radws of the project site RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planrnng Commission approve the modification to the Master Plan DRCDR01-04 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval Respectfully submitted, Br uller City Planner BB•NF mlg Attachments Exhibit "A" - Approved Master Plan Land Use Pattem Exhibit "B" Exhibit "C" Exhibit "D" Exhibit "E" Exhibit "F" Draft Reso~ - Proposed Master Plan Land Use Pattem - Revised Pages of the Master Plan - General Plan Regional Center Land Use Mix Table III-4 - Companson for Proposed and Current Urnts/Density - Master Plan Concepts for Area West of Day Creek Boulevard ution of Approval for DRCDR01-04 Mod No 2 ~~ ~~ Rasa la.a Rasd M.aed Use NAP CR~Orr~ L Mned Winery Use $ Village Center - u Commmereial S Msaed use Ssngle Family 4fi /Acrt Mned use NAP ~~ Fi use Single Mired use Family Single Family ? d-6/Acre 4-6 /Acrc rT Temple Property Mrsed Uu p~i[E Msaed use ''- ~tNi: Miasd use $sngk Family Ssngk FamOY d-6 /Acre Mned nse I.6 /Acrt Sfngk Family 410 / Aeyyrt ~ T ve T a~ Mrsed use ° g Ssngle Family SO • 410y/Aert ~u T ~ . u ~ dF3 ~® c ~ ~ RmidemW , Y 5 r. ;~ asg6 Dttniry s, ya Smror aomsne•. ~ x E Ee f~ ~~{~ nit FatMWI lkaMVad Exhlblt 4 _' GAD L "~ n~Master Plan ~~a~ ~~ Mrsed Use Single Family dfi /Acrc NAP ll ~ ESP/ Mined use Single Family dfi /Aert ......... s>.ro. A.e.roam.ueraro..ed ' nine. MuW UV Gmme.v.l Re{va.lCarv O MYM Ur G®veW R.{I...I tltlaM ^ MuM meMWmm Nhl RUWmmly Nq4 Dm.7 Smkr Nswb{ ® W.eery Pnpeny ® MuW Use Wk{eCmnx Cemmvevl ^ MuW UU/MN °.. v'emmercW (MM H.{a nevurv Re sr Csmmvrnlt ^ MnM Uu M.d. Hf{a Reaamavl xqa pe.airv Maokmlly J/ O MnM UU Sinrk hmily 4lW AOe ///{' ^ M~aM Ne S~v{k F.wh 46l ACrt Vicr/t~o~r/i~'ga Arbors Master Plan Base Line Road to Foothill Blvd. 2 CHAPTER 2 COMMUNITY STRUCTURE & DESIGN CONCEPTS Base lab Raad Mlaed Use NAP Mined ~./ Ust l.~ 1¢e Ginter Mixed use / NAP '-~ f~ --idrsed Mrsed use uae Mrsed Usc Single Family Single Single Family Ofi/Acrc ~ Family 4-b/ACrc gT ~8.v •.. NAP Mued us< Singk Famiy d-f / A[rc Temple Property Mined UseO~lC.l' NAP Magid uu ~~ Single Family 4a IAcK .-~~.~ Mlaed uu Single Fumily s•to /Acrc or Med. Yaatigr. ResWmtW 614/Atre Mrsed Use 1i~6 Yuw}ay Pik lnap s{" ~# ~E EF f k Mised ose Smgk Family 46 /Acrc 1'rL:e:l U:. 1`rl_aiuw Ltls.ity I:CJIlt_IIIILI FooVAI Baubvatd Mrsed use ,J (~ (~ Single Family d-10 /Arse Ml:ed use Smgk Family 1-6 / Aerc '~a~ ~~~~~~~~~~ Tnae Arm le be MeuerpWeed 7 c ~ Mired .~~N a M see Mind Ur Ceumr4l W{balCetc MuM UV CenmecW RedsW Pdeltl .w Tl ® 111{1 eeml)a b 11 la W4eryM1ePrr.Y MI.N Uae Valge Cmler Cemmarui ^ M4~d UW M.x 0.ea/Csmveusul IMe6 Nqn UeadA Rea er Gmmveu0 MnN Ux Med Hqn ReWesIW M J$ xqn Jr ^ Mum u.r sins4 F.mnr. 4la Aire T (EIMer4NAae er YlWAee) /teary ~, ~ a MnN Ua Sueb gm11r 4d Arr~ Master Plan Amendment (NEON? Exhlbrt 4 as PP Victoria Arbors Master Plan Base Line Road to Foothill Blvd. 2 CHAPTER 2 COMMUNITY STRUCTURE & DESIGN CONCEPTS Base Lme Roatl ~yuwiuiuiii're - boxed ~ Use boxed Uu Vdlage Center \.\P U Commmeraal 0 ..• .••. •.. uuw.wuw wulr \L+ed me 4'rull ar \AP r Winery mrwa o ~ boxed use Single JLxed use Famih amum Singig Famlh 4-b /Acre 4-6/Acre bhzed use Single Famdy 4-6 Lore boxed Use Single Famlh 3-b /Acre \P Temple Property Mtxed Use NAP Mixed use Mixed use `v ww~+'~iw'.IaHF1 Sln le FamJ Smgie Famdy 46/AcreY 4-6/Acre w Mixed use w Single Famdv 4-10 L\cre a~ ' boxed use Single Famdy 4-10 /Acre Mrsed Use Medmm fhgh Residential or High Denary Senwr Ilouang boxed use Commercml Regional Related ~DS West a~ Exhibit 4 L- s ' ~. E ~u° c`~ ,: E ~ fi EU `e~~ ~ E `u° ~ .a,!~r~ ~a~~ Ciledml Lend! a>-1...11!11 ~~~ t'rv~iuir, r~'NutrP IIII~pt'f _ ~ i _ ~. ~U Lam, Uctona Park b zed use C meraal Regl al Related FootndlBwlevartl Existing Master Plan W.ed Uu Commttn.I Reyon.I R[Ined ^ Nned uu NM~om H~gllRmd<nuvl or x~gh Den n $en or Homing Oi amerv Propenr O Need UU\dl.ge Cenur COmmtt[wl ^ +1..ee ma+1 x aeacommeraa Ixlee x,ge Denene ae. or commern.p r~ ~ ( ^ Y xlned Use+IM 14gh Rn~demul ^ H~gA Densn. Nulubm~F J"I ^ + +Inetl Uu SmRIe F.mih 1101ACre ~• (EnM1eN-61A<re or ]-10/AOe) +Ined Use Single Femdr iW Atre Victoria Arbors Master Plan Base Line Road to Foothill Blvd. Mixed use &ngle FamdF 4fi /Acre Mixed Use Regonai Related Commernal NAP ~ `e~~a • ~ ~~~~~~~~~ TM1eu Arne to Le M1lsalerpl.nned `~~ Q, Mrsed Vu Commertnl Reg~ona Cennr 2 CHAPTER 2 COMMUNITY STRUCTURE & DESIGN CONCEPTS Base Line Road °"""°'--' ~~ M111xxd ../ - Ust I_$ m° Village C¢nter DLxed Use Comm msnml \AP U o' DLxed use Single Famdv 4-bl.\cre SLxed me Singlg Family 4-b / Acrc DLxed me /AAP M1Lxed use Single DLxed Use Single Famiy 4-b /Acre \.\P Temple Property DLxed Use \AP Mired use ara~+~7: DLxed use Single Famih Single Famiy 4fi /.\cre DLxed use 4-6 /Acre Single Family 4-10/.\~c-r.ye ~ ~ V Need use Single Family 4-10 /Acre or Ned Dennty Resildenhal 614J/yAcre V Mixed Use High Dennty Multi-Family v z"z` ~9 & n I'iL:a llae \~ 1'dedww 11_u.u~ f'e~lJinn~l D D a DLxed use Singlc Famdv 4-b /Acre Mixed Use Regional Related Cammeraal NAP ~a~ `Qj~ ,egend anann. Tnex Areaarobe M1laslerPlenned ~ ~~ m<rntl Regional Center ^ Nned Ux COm `~ ' i~ Nned Ux Com eraal Reg~onnl Relaletl Ydona PaM1 Loop ^ M1Haed use Meamm Nigh Rai4eneal or H~gM1 Uena~U Semor Houamg Hued use Mixed use }" ®} nme.v napeny Commereial Commer ~` Regional Rel Region laced ~ nH.ea us<zauge ame. eommea~a ^ M1o.m u.e/+1 x ae./enmmer<m 1Heil H~gn Dens~h Rn or CommertuH FOOmtlI BOU¢vard I'"f ^ xRaeJ uu tiled xrgn ResMennal V ^ H~gA Uenne xlultrbmib ^ xLretl Ux Single ivmtlr 110/A<re IEnper JNA<r<or ]-10/ACrel ^ xLaeJ Ux SinRle FvmiM1 JfilAtr< ~ I)swest Victoria Arbors Master Plan ~,am t~ Master Plan Amendment (NEW) , Base Line Road to Foothill Blvd. Exh/brt 4 2 CHAPTER 2 COMMUNITY STRUCTURE & DESIGN CONCEPTS ~ !: • ^ ^ ^ ' 1~~~~~ ~..~~~ !~.rr~~ ^ I r~ ~~ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ I ^ mm~~3 ~~ ~ I ~~ Base Line Road m C d Q W 'O C A 3 ._~ W ViCtona oop ~ •~• vay a.~ccn rceywna~ uan - ^~ ~ ~ Day Creek Blvd. Senic 8~ ' Recreation Corridor Trail j ~ •~~•• Local Trail Connections ~~ ~ ^.^^ Private Trail Connection IBo=v~_ o unit- PP Y ~ COMMUNITY STRUCTURE Exhibit 5 COMMUNITY STRUCTURE & DESIGN CONCEPTS CHAPTER 2 3 1~~. w ~-. m``e %r' 1~ ;• ~ ~ ~y- w Z W Y J J LEGEND r~ i ~~ 'T~ ~ ---- ~_~ ~'e ^T~'9/ ~ PPRK LANE ~ 1.L-- ~~-r 1 Y ~kr~_ BASELINE ROAD ~~~^ V~ctona Park Lane Trail ~~~~ Day Creek Blvd. Scenic & Recrea[~on Corr~dorTrail [o Epicenter ~~~~ Church Street Trail ~~~~ Local Trail O City Traii -Roadside Lane Regwnal TraJ EXHIBIT 16 COI~'IlVIUNITY TRAIL SYSTEM FOOTHILL i iii'--t~ ~ ~ j ~ ~_ ~ ~ 11~ ~ ~ J 1 !! i~~~-~ ~ i~ ~ • ~ ---- - W a a 0 Z Q W D ARROW ~/ HIGHWAY • C J ^ I pppppppppppp~ppppppO 1 ~ ^ ~~ ' Yill~f f Dlf~ef'I R ' • r • 1 ^ • I ^ ^ ^ i ^~uuu~~~~i 1 ~ ^ ^ ^ ~n ^ ^rr~s~sses~• •~~~~ 0 e ^ Base Line 1 m 3 C Q v c i W i COMMUNITY RECREATION & OPEN SPACE CHAPTER S 4 EXAMPLE OF WRAP-AROUND PORCH EXHIBIT 3'~ u N E W SITE PLANNING GUIDELINES FOR MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Multi-family Residential site planning Shall follow the. Cay of Rancho Cucamonga Residential Design Guidelines and the Multi-Family Development Standards in the City of Rancho Cucamonga Devel- opment Codes Muln-Family architectural design shall be consistent with the gwdelmcs and standards found m Part IL, Multi-Family Residential Archi- recture, Chapter 7, Architectural Guidelines of this Master Plan document. SITE PLANNING GUIDELINES FOR MIXED- USE COMMERCIAL Mixed-Use Commercial site planning shall follow the City of Rancho Cucamonga Commerual Design Guidelines and the Commcraal Develop- ment Standards m the City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Codes Commercial architectural design shall be consistent with the guidelines and standards found mPart V,Mixed-Use Commercial Architecture, Chapter 7, Archuccrural Gwdehnes of this Master Plan document • S CHAPTER 6 SITE PLANNING GUIDELINES VICTORIA ARBORS MASTCR PLAN 3'-0" X 2'-0" Plant with Parthenocissus Wide tricuspidata Pre-Cast Concrete Cap Unpainted Slump Block Pilaster Minimum 150' o c Slump Block Cap Slump Block with Sack Finish, Painted White ~ : ~r. 1 _ y ~~ ~~,~,- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ..,...s. L ~ ., _c."~ mat 1 7 ~ s / t[ Je id . _ . _ .. t.,. - mo ~ r ~ _> >..~ 79 1 ..~. _ ~ _ ~ .r~ .~r.u..a.'1 ~.-..~... Exhrbrt 40 VICTORIA THEME WALL • ARCHITECTURAL GUIDELINES CHAPTER 7 15 VICTORIA ARBORS MA51 ER PLAN W Z II. MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECTURE The mule-Eamlly portions of Victoria Arbors should also reflect the character of "Wme Country" Many of the elements required and encouraged for single-family residential architecture in Vicrona arbors also apply to attached homes The following apply to multi-family. Prohibited Styles and Materials: "Santa Barbara" style with white or pmk stucco walls and shallow-pitched red rile roofs is prohibited, as are the Spanish Colonial styles with similar characteristics The use of red barrel rile is prohibited • 16 CHAPTER 7 ARCHITECTURAL GUIDELINES I^1 I• VICTORIA ARBORS MASTER PLAN GOOD EXAMPLE OF ITALIAN~MEDITER- RAINEAN STYLE MULTI-FAMILY TUSCAN-STYLE MULTI-FAMILY WITH WINDOW TREATMENT, NA LC ONI ES AND TRELLIS TRAMONTO, LAKE NEVADA RESORT • Encouraged Styles: European and Mediterranean influenced archuec- mre is encouraged, particularly from France and Italy Monterrey style archuecnire Is an acceptable Spanish-influenced arch¢ecture Porches• While porches are not practical on medwm-high and high-density housing, they may be apphcable on certain low-medmm attached product, and are encouraged when possible Trellises and Arbors: These structures are architectural icons within Victoria Arbors and must be included within multifamily projects They are a good structural element to give human scale to large mule-family bwldings They can be used vertically to esplanade plants on walls, horizontally as shade structures above entrances and windows and as independent structures within the landscape . Balconies and Window Treatment: Balconies add detail and fenestration to buildings and provide alternative, sheltered outdoor space within which to relax The various balconies, verandas and balustrades shown earher In this chapter can apply romulti-family structures as well as single-family homes Window treatment Is an ~m~~r~~~~ PIPmP~~ ,n defining architectural style to buildings The windo consistent with the style of Roofing: Roofing is also important i styles and character All of t and gwdelmes found earls apply to multifamily r 1 LJ ARCHITECTURAL GUIDELINES CHAPTER 7 17 VICTORIA ARBORS MASTER PLAN MEDITERRANEAN STYLE MUI.T I-FAMILY WITH DORMERS AND GOOD WINDOW TREAT-MENT RECREATION CENTER WITH TOWER AND INTERESTING WINDOW TREATMENT III. VILLAGE COMMERCIAL/ WINERY ARCHITECTURE (Mixed ,~ - ~~ ~~ Frlippi Winery Use Village Commerc[al) The Mixed Use Village Commeraal area of Victoria Arbors is contiguous to the hisronc Elena (now Filippi) Winery The Village Commercial and Winery properties must be master planned at a more refined level as one protect, although they may be processed and developed separately It is necessary for these properties to work out shared access points, internal vehicular and pedestrian connections and pedestrian space connections Therefore, it is necessary for the arrangement and placement of buildings on both properties to be appropriately integrated to faalitate these shared connections When completed the two properties should visually and functionally appear as one element Grocery stores, drug stores, restaurants and other community and neighborhood-serving uses fall under Village Commercial category (See Chapter 3 -Land Use) It Is expected that the winery property will continue to operate ns winery and wine sales outlet, and ro supplement that wuh one or more restaurants as well as shops and other related uses The theme of tha area well be a winery estate, wrth a working winery The histonc portion of the winery building and related winery operation bwldmgs will all be funcuomng out-buildings It has been determined through a histonc survey that the winery site is historically significant - represennng some of the last physical remnants of Cucamonga Valley's rich cultural past The buildings are of industrial/agrarian architecture. They evolved through a series of functional, non-descript additions It Is assumed that most 18 CHAPTER 7 ARCHITECTURAL GUIDELINES VICTORIA AR60 R5 MASTER PLAN U • Colden Vine Winery FeGppi Winery Property Fd,ppi Wuiery Sales Room of the existing sheds and secondary buildings well be removed over time as the winery property develops. It is also expected that the winery buildings) that remain will be Improved within historic preservation hmuations. A SIZE AND MASSING The archuectural design of the Village Commercial area shall be one and two story buildings (excepting towers or other architectural features which may be three stones) with trellises over walkways, arcades and openings that create interest, and relate to a human scale ` Larger bmldmgs must be brought down to pedestrian scale through the use of covered entrances, trellises, arbors and other scale- . reducing elements All sides of the buildings should receive adequate enrichment and fenestration through the use of window/door treatments, dormers, and other methods of adding building fenestra- tion, detail and interest Speaal landscape treatment, including training of vines on walls and trellises can also break up the visual impact of large buildings. B. CHARACTER AND STYLE • New buildings in the village commercial area will reflect the Winery Estate theme. This style could be the Early California Monterrey theme, or French or Italian influenced estates or villas Many of the ARCHITECTURAL GUIDELINES CHAPTER 7 19 VICTORIA ARBORS MASTER PLAN Sterllug Winery St Jean Winery With Itakan Influences Hertz Cellars wineries m Napa and Sonoma Valleys have been • built to capture the European winery character, others have captured early Californian flavor Either is acceptable on this site C. PEDESTRIAN OPEN SPACE Pedestrian open spaces should possess a human scale and incorporate trellises and arbors wuh vines, and period cast Iron and steel furniture for outdoor sealing and enjoyment Awnings are permitted to provide accent to the buildings, however, trellises are preferred Small tower elements at corners are encour- aged. The use of wine making arnfacts such as manual grape crushers as elements to enrich the pedestnan spaces is encouraged The use of winery-related materials in the landscape, • such as wine barrels for trash containers, is also highly encouraged 20 CHAPTER 7 ARCHITECTURAL GUIDELINES • VICTORIA AR60RS MASTER PLAN Character photos on tbu page are from the Golden Verse Winery exb:brt at Desney Calrfornra Adventure and the SC Jean Wrnery Restaurant IV. MIXED USE COMMERCIAL (South of Church St., West of Day Creek Blvd., and North of Foothill Blvd. I Thls area includes Regional Related Commercial and Mixed Use Commeraal. The streetscape design along Foothill Blvd. shall be consistent with 3 The Foothills Blvd Route 66 Visual Improvement ~+' Plan. The streetscape deslgn along Day Creek Z Blvd. shall be conslstent with the Day Creek Blvd. Master Plan and Chapter Four -Community Landscape Guidelines m this Vlctona Arbors Master Plan • ARCHITECTURAL GUIDELINES CHAPTER 7 21 VICTORIA ARBORS MASTER PLAN Exhrbrt 41 PHOTOMONTAGE OF SOUTH WINERY ENTRY THIS GRAPHIC ILLUSTRATES ENTAY CHARACTER ONLY FINAL DESIGN MAY DIFFER (SEE EXHIBIT 43 FOR LOCATIONI ST FRANCIS WINERY ~ -1 ~IMa ~~~ The architecture of Regional Related and Mixed Use Commercial should reflect the theme of "Wine Country" to the degree possible The following elements that apply to Village Commeraal, also apply here Size and Massing: The archuectural design of these commercial areas may be one and two story buildings excepting decorative architectural features (which are encouraged) that may be three stories. Trellises over walkways, arcades or openings that create interest and relate to human scale are strongly encouraged • Largcr buildings must be brought down to pedestrian scale through the use of covered entrances, trellises, arbors and other scale-reducing elements 22 CHAPTER 7 ARCHITECTURAL GUIDELINES C~ THE MUMM WINERY -NOTE USE OF ARCADES TO BRING BUILDING DOWN TO PEDESTRIAN SCALE • VICTORIA ARBORS MASTER PLAY BURK RANCH- NOTE USE OF ARBORS WITH VINES AND ROOF TAEATM ENT CHARLES KRUG WINERY -NOTE ROOF TR EATMENT~ WINDOW TREATMENT AND MATERIALS • All sides of the buildings should receive adequate enrichment and fenestration through the use of window/door treatments, arbors and other methods of adding building interest and reducnon of scale Special landscape treatment, including training of vines on walls and trellises can also break up the visual Impact of large buildings. • Larger commeraal buildings should capture the character of large winery bulldmgs, which typically reflect European architecture with simple forms, vines trained on walls and interesting entry features • ARCHITECTURAL GUIDELINES CHAPTER 7 23 VICTORIA ARBORS MASTER PLAN JORDAN WINERY -GOOD EXAMPLE OF TRAINED VINES ON BUILDING KORBEL WINERY -EXAMPLE OF TRAINED VINES ON BUILDING IV. PUBLIC AND COMMUNITY • FACILITIES Public and Community Faclhnes In Vlctona Arbors include a Neighborhood Park, Linear Parks or Pascos, an Elementary School and landscaping m pubhc rights-of-way. Design and development of pubhc and community facihues and open space must also reflect the VICCOrla Arbors destgn theme: wine country This means that landscaping in the school and park should reflect the landscaping theme elsewhere in [he protect (landscaping m pubhc rights-of--way are discussed m Chapter 4) Buildings m the neighborhood park (shade structure and rest room) should include trellis or arbor elements. School buildings must also include trellis elements. Any visnor traveling through the community should be aware they are m Victoria Arbors, because of the consistency in use of materials and continuity of destgn, Including pubhc spaces. • 24 CHAPTER 7 ARCHITECTURAL GUIDELINES VICTORIA ARBORS MASTER PLAN LEGEND • • • ® DAY CREEK BOULEVARD (Per City Master Plan)' ® VICTORIA LOOP RHUS LANCEA (FORMAL) WITH 5' WIDE SIDEWALK THE MEDIAN TO BE PLANTED WITH LIQUIDAMBAR STRACIFLUA "FESTIVAL" (FORMAL) ® CHURCH STREET PRIMARY TREE SHALL BE MAGNOLIA GRANDIFLORA "SAMUEL SOMMER"(INFORMAL) WHERE SPACE ALLOWS, THE BACKGROUND TREE SHALL BE GEIJERA PARVIFOLIA (INFORMAL) A 6' WIDE MEANDERING WALK WILL BE PROVIDED MEDIAN SHALL HAVE LAGERSTROEMIA INDICA "NATCHEZ" (FORMAL) d ARBOR LANE A 40' WIDE PEDESTRIAN ISLAND WILL INCLUDE A MINIMUM 10' WIDE WALKWAY AND REGIMENTED PLACEMENT OF PLATANUS ACERFOLIA "BLOODGOOD" TREES PARKWAYS PLANTED WITH PINUS CANARIENSIS (FORMAL) AN INNER CIRCLE OF CALIFORNIA FAN PALMS (FORMAL) WILL BE PLACED THE NORTHERN TERMINIS OF THE PEDESTRIAN ISLAND ~ VICTORIA LINEAR PARK THIS LINEAR PARK CONTINUES FROM VICTORIA PARK LANE WITH A 10' MEANDERING WALKWAY AND A 50/50 MIX OF PINUS CANARIENSIS AND PLATANUS ACERFOLIA "BLOOD- GOOD" (INFORMAL) ® ETIWANDA AVENUE EUCALYPTUS CAMALOULENSIS IN 13' WIDE PLANTING AREA BETWEEN CURB AN WALK PINUS CANAR- IENSISAND PLATANUS ACERFOLIA "BLOODGOOD" TO BE USED INFORMALLY BEHIND WALK (IN YARDS) WASHINGTONIA ROBUSTA INTERSPERSED EVENLY WITH PYRUS CALLEYANA "ARISTOCRAT" TRIANGULATED TREE ROWS TO FLANK A MEANDERING 10' TRAIL ON EASTSIDE OF THE STREET, AND A MEANDERING 6' SIDEWALK ON WESTSIDE OF THE STREET MEDIAN WILL ALSO INCORPORATE PYRUS CALLEYANA "ARISTOCRAT" O BASELINE ROAD (Per City Master Plan -East of Haven)a MAGNOLIA GRANDIFLORA "SAMUEL SOMMER" IN TRIANGULAR FORMATION PINUS CANARIENSIS USED AS OCCASIONAL INFORMAL BACKDROP LIQUIDAMBER STYRACIFLUA "FESTIVAL" IS THE ACCENT TREE THE 5' WIDE CONCRETE WALK SHALL MEANDER TO ALLOW PLANTING AREA FOR TREES (MAY REQUIRE SIDEWALK EASEMENTS) INTERIOR STREETS CERCIS OCCIDCNTALIS, GEIJERA PARVIFLORA, LAGERSTROMEA INDICA (FAURIAL HYBRIDS), MAGNOLIA "ST MARY", PYRUS CALLERYANA, AND RHUS LANCEA NOTE ALL TREES TO BE SITED AND SPACED PER CITY ENGINEERING DIVISION • ALL PUBLICLY MAINTAINED PARKWAYS MUST INCORPORATE 40% DECORATIVE HARDSCAPE MEDIAN DESIGN HARDSCAPE PER THE ENGINEERING DIVISION LEGEND Community Entry at Commercial use Southeast and Southwest corner at Baseline Road and Day Creek Boulevard (See detailed plamJ Community Entry at Commercial use (Southeast and southwest corners) At Residential use (Northeast and Northwest corners) (See detailed plan Special Community Entry TT (See de(mled plamJ Regional City Gateway (See Aetmled y(amJ CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN EXHIBIT 8 COMMUNITY LANDSCAPE GUIDELINES CHAPTER 4 VICTORIA ARBORS MASTER PLAN :! III. DEVELOPING THE COMMUNITY professional and corporate offices, and other support commercial uses that do not conflict with the commercial potential further south along the I-15 corndor at Fourth Street. raeLElu-a '~f ~ n THE REGIONAL CENTER LAND USE MIX I , ~-ii' ++" Estimated • Acreage Range "Most Case" Percent • Density (dWacm) Acres/Dwelling Land Use Ran a Dwellin Unrt Ran a Units du Commercial -retail, service 20% - 45% 102-230 acres _ 225 acres commercial, office, tounst commercial Public/Ouasi Public - 5% -12% 26-61 acres 40 acres performing arts center, trails, landscape/hardscape, public s aces Residential 15%- 30% 77-153 acres ~ 98 acres ~ 14 du/acm~ ~4 du7acre 11 1 078 to 2 142 du 1 372'du Residential -Low Medium 6% 32 acres 32 acres ~ 4.8 du/acre 8 du/acre 128 to 256 du 208 dui Total Residential 21 %- 36% 107-185 ecres 130 acme 1,206 to 2 398 du 1,580 du ROW - collector/locel roads 20% - 25% 102-128 acres 115 acres TOTALS 100% 510 acres 510 acres 1 The acreage m tli~s category also mGudes land for local pads and school purposes 2 Indicates target densrry, not a range Actual densdy may increase up to 20 dWae as long as the total of 1,372 dwelling unds a not exceeded 3 Indicates target dwelling units based on histonc cltf' e~enence where development occurs midway between 50 and 75% of the range Public/Quasl public uses include a performing arts center, public parks or pnvately owned spaces open to the public during normal hours of operation, pedestnan paths and sidewalks, bikeways, landscape and hardscape areas within and connecting to public spaces, schools to serve residential uses, and other public facilities necessary to achieve a well supported development and assure a high level of amenities. J Residential uses are Intended to be an integral part of the development, rather than separate enclaves Isolated by arterial highways from the rest of the development. Buffering, building design and onentation, lighting control, noise control and other considerations to assure a high standard of residential quality are expected as part of the design for integration of uses The Intent Is to create a truly contemporary urban complex on a par with the best practices in urban design A variety of densities and housing types Is envisioned, from muftrfamlly condominiums and apartments to detached single family residential. Housing types that cater to the Irfestyles of couples and professionals without children are one example of the emerging market niche that is particularly ~ ~~ t1 ~~ ({`ty'ojRancho Cucamonga Gen'lr/ Plan r^ ~r,~ Page //l-sS October77, 2007 C~~/.o5/ D`~uAOlPwrjorp.wmrlcP LU Masur Reporwx s `0 ~I 'r ,11 REGIONAL CENTER MIXED USE BLOCK -LAND USE MIX '° `, ;T.'.~' '•`t - # "'"~~GENERAL-PLA ~ ~ x .~~'=~°" < .MAS,TE ~ RPLAN ~~r N PERCE ,~„~<,, .. TAGESrBY,~ACREAGE ; , ~• ~ ,. LAND USE ~ ~Acrea'-e~&~l^Jnifs ~ "` Acrea ~e '3& Unit , a'-'e~l . Maste~~Plan~~~: , ~ .-,, Ran a =~ ~Most'tGase Curcent~ RfO osed slam ~ Currentru 'Pro 'osed: Commercial 102-230 225 205 180 20-45% 40% 35% Public/Quasi Public 26-61 40 48 48 5_12P g% g% Multi-family Residential 77-153 98 (d) 41 (e) 65 15-30% 8% 13% Units # 1,078-2,142 1,372 d 834 a 1,668 Single-family Residential 32 32 181 181 6% 36% 36% Units # 128-256 208 f 709 709 Total ~ -, Residential ;~..~ ~ ~~ ~'a'" ~~r •-~', "'107, 485 . _ .. ~ 130 222 246 2 -36 ° ¢^' '~<.,~~ 44°~ ; , a, Y=`} ,+ ~~ ~ 48 / ~ n, Units # ~ ~ ~ 1;206 2;398 ' ~~~~ ~1t580 ~ 543 2 3 7 , o .- r s ,;;;,? ,.- ., „ , ~ $ 7 , ~. tr }w ! ROW 102-128 115 35 36 20-25% 7% 7% TOTALS 510 510 510 510 100% 100% 100% (d) "MH", units - 22 34 X 19 + 409 (proposed Lewis project) (e) 46 63 ac "H" plus 18 54 ac "MH", units - (46 63 x 27 plus 409 from Lewis protect) (f) Arbors 555 lots + 136 lots ESP + 18 tots from out parcels (#) actual, as proposed, estimated at mid-range, or a combination of them I \final\pingcomm\Rancho Cucamonga LAND USE MIX xls • ! i ~ • ! ' ' ~ I ~ EDISON Ui1LRY CORRIDOR ' I COMMERCIAL II ; ' DEVELOPEMENr cNAMBRAY AT MERffAQE A~ t~ ~ ' _ , , ,,. , 1 , VICTORIA ARBORS VICTORIA ARB • psi+i~l+p!.'•yt''+Yp p '_I: A III\~fl, ~,!^•~ p~d;;;;I,,~ - ~ ~ 'VIA ° ~, 9~.+'+;yE~:~tu~,l p, ~ - ~ - _ - -- ce Qy'19p;'~"!~np i -. I`m, 4~ P -~-=;. v DAY! _ - - - --~ -- - EBEEK-~="_*+. r'f ~~~1-i~..f )'.Illy l'~~ '~7 '-~ ',~~ ~~~~1~._ RESIDENTIAL DEVELC (DR NORTON) •I ~~ '~I, ~T'" 'I +. BOVLE '-- =~:._~__~~ i --L- I ~~~~ { ~ ~ , i II , ,_ ,~ _~ i° t 'I ;~~. -Z ,~,~ rRaccr ra Tha Ke~Ch Com pe niea ~~~ ITKC..' VICTORIA ARBORS DEVELOPEMENT EXHIBIT ~"` ~ n rre a~ ti. a on Mq asem a ~ RESOLUTION NO 03-73 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MODIFICATION NO 2 TO DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRCDR01-04 FOR A REQUEST TO MODIFY THE PATTERN OF RESIDENTIAL USES FOR THE PLANNING AREA WEST OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD, SOUTH OF CHURCH STREET, MODIFY VARIOUS GRAPHICS, AND ADD DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR MULTI-FAMILY AND COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE VICTORIA ARBORS MASTER PLAN, GENERALLY BOUNDED BY BASE LINE ROAD, ETIWANDA AVENUE, FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AND DAY CREEK CHANNEL, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0227-161-28, 31, 33, 35, 36, AND 38, 0227- 171-08, 11, 12, 20, 22, 23, AND 25, 0227-201-04, 13 THRU 18, 22, 28 THRU 31, 33, AND 36; AND 0227-211-40 A ReGtals 1 On March 7, 2001, the Planning Commission approved and adopted Resolution No 01-04 approving a Development Review for the Residential Master Plan for Victoria Arbors (the "Development Review") 2 On March 26, 2003, the Planning Commission approved Amendment No 1 through the adoption of Resolution No 03-54, amending Condition No 22 of the Planning Drv~sion • Conddions of Approval to allow recreational vehiGe storage to be provided by approved facilities Nnthin a 1-mtle radws of the exterior boundary of the Vidona Planned Community 3 American Beauty Development Company filed an application for Amendment No 2 to Development Review No DRCDR01-04, as described in the title of this Resolution, hereinafter in this Resolution, the subiect Development Review Amendment Request is referred to as "the application " 4 On May 14, 2003, this Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and conGuded said meeting on that date All legal prerequisites poor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, deterrnined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby spe~cally finds that all of the facts set forth in the ReGtals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on May 14, 2003, inGuding written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to property generally bounded by Base Line Road to the . north, Etiwanda Avenue to the east, Foothill Boulevard to the south, and Day Creek Channel to the west, and ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 03-73 DRCDR 01-04-AMERICAN BEAUTY DEV CO • May 14, 2003 Page 2 b The property to the north of the subject sde consists of existing single-family residential and a commercial center within the Windrows Village of the Vidona Community Plan, the property to the south is being graded for the future Vidona Gardens Regional Center (approximately 175 acres), the property to the east is vacant, unimproved land ~th a Low-Medwm Residential designation vinthin the Etnnianda Specific Plan, and the property to the west consists of the Day Creek Flood Control Channel and Edison utility comdor, and c The proposed protect continues to be consistent with the General Plan Mixed Use Disthd as further defined in the Vidona Community Plan, and d The proposed probed continues to conform to the standards and regulations in Vidona Community Plan, and e. The proposed probed will continue to comply with the environmental mitigation listed in the EIR document entitled "Final Environmental Impact Report Vidona Arbors Village SCH No. 98041137." 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the spec findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a The proposed protect continues to be consistent with the obtedives of the General Plan, and b The proposed use continues to be in accord with the ob~edives of the Vidona Community Plan and the purposes of the distnd in which the site is located, and c The proposed use continues to be in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Vidona Commurnty Plan, and d The proposed use together with the conditions applicable thereto will continue not to be detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare or materially intunous to properties or improvements rn the vicirnty. 4 This Commission hereby determines that none of the elements set forth in Public Resources Code Section 21166 or Section 15162 of the Calrfomia Environmental Quality Act Guidelines ("CEQA Guidelines") exists and therefore determines, in accordance with Public Resources Code Section 21166 and Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines, that no subsequent or supplemental Environmental Impact Report or Mitigated Negative Declaration is required to be prepared, prior to adopting this Resolution 5 Based upon the findings and contusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subted to each and every condition set forth below Planning Division 1) Approve the changes as shown in the May 14, 2003, Staff Report Exhibit "C" titled Victoria Arbors Master Plan Amendment dated May 7, 2003 ~a~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 03-73 DRCDR 01-04 -AMERICAN BEAUTY DEV CO May 14, 2003 Page 3 2) Provide buffenng between single-family and multi-family development, and between commeraal and residential development 3) The design for multi-family development should not have bwldings that line up along the streets or exhibit a ngid onentaUon pattern The sde design should have acampus-like setting Nnth generous open space 4) All conditions of approval contained in Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 01-23 and 03-54 shall apply 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certrfy to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF MAY 2003 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY' Larry McNiel, Chainnan ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Plamm~g Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Plamm~g Commission held on the 14th day of May 2003, by the following vote-to-mnt AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS. ABSENT COMMISSIONERS ~a ~ • T H E C I T Y O F R A N C h O C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE: May 14, 2003 TO. Chairman and Members of the Planning Commisslon FROM. Brad Buller, Clty Planner BY. Ruben Warren, Planning Technician SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2003-00348 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend Section 17 08 (Residential Distncts) of the Development Code regarding second dwelling units within the Very Low, Low, and Low-Medium (1-2, 2-4, and 4-8 dwelling units per acre, respectively) Resldentlal Distncts to comply with State Assembly BIII 1866 BACKGROUND Recently, the State approved Assembly BIII 1866, where the approval of a second dwelling unit becomes a ministerial act Effective July 1, 2003, a local agency Is preempted from requiring a discretionary permit The municipality may continue to apply basic development standards and claim the second dwelling units as evidence of satisfying housing elements At the February 12, 2003, Planning Commission hearing, staff requested consideration for amending the second dwelling unit section of the Development Code to be In compliance with State Law The Planning Commisslon directed staff to process the amendment for their review ANALYSIS A Existing Reoulations of Second Dwelling Units Currently second dwelling units, also commonly known as "granny flats" are permitted by Conditional Use Permit In the Very Low, and Low-Medwm Residential District with lots of 10,000 square feet or greater. The unit shall not exceed 640 square feet, however, If the lot Is greater than 20,000 square feet, a maximum of 950 square feet is permissible Development standards such as setbacks, lot coverage, parking requirements, and architectural elements are applicable Per Section 1704 035 of the Development Code, a public hearing and notification to properties within a 300-foot radius Is required for the Conditional Use Permit At the hearing the Clty Planner takes an action on the permit B Proposed Chanoes to Regulations for Second Dwelling Units. As prescribed by State mandate, a Conditional Use Permit and the public hearing process can no longer be . required for second dwelling units The Development Code will Ilst second dwelling units as permitted In the Very Low, Low, and Low-Medium Residential Distncts The Clty will review second dwelling units for compliance with development standards through the plan check process As approval of second dwelling units becomes a ministerial act, ITEM F PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DCA DRC2003-00348 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA May 14, 2003 . Page 2 development cntena requinng Design Review must be eliminated. Staff recommends adding design standards which clanfy second dwelling units must be designed to match the pnmary dwelling in architectural style, colors, roofing matenal, and architectural details as reflected in the attached exhibit (Exhibit "A"). Also, the second dwelling units must comply with the development cntena under Hillside and Equestnan Overlay Districts rf the lots are within those distncts. CORRESPONDENCE• This item was advertised as a public heanng in the Inland Vallev Dailv Bulletin newspaper. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT• Staff has reviewed the proposed amendment in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder and determined that it is exempt pursuant to State CEQA Gwdelines, Section 15061 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution recommending approval of Development Code Amendment DRC2003-00348 to the City Counal. Respectfully submitted, • Brad Buller City Planner BB•RW/tc Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Section 17.08 030 -Use Regulations (changes) Exhibit "B" - February 12, 2003 Planning Commission Staff Report Draft Resolution Recommending Approval of Development Code Amendment DRC2003-00348 • ~a Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17 08 030 USE VL L LM M MH H 17 Utility or Service Faabty C C C C C C C Accessory Uses 1 Accessory Structure P P P P P P 2 Antenna P P P p p p 3 Caretaker's Residence C C C C C C 4 Guest House P P P - - 5 Home Occupation P P P P P P 6 Lodging Umt p p p - - _ 7 Other Accessory Uses P P P P P P 8 Private Garage P P P P P P 9 Pnvate Swimming Pool p P P P p p 10 Second Dwelling Unit (including P F P elder cottage) 11 Recreational Vehicle Storage Yard - C C C C C 12 Feed & Tack Store (if accessory to C _ _ _ _ _ commercial stable) 13 Dormitory (rf accessory to college or C C C C C C school) 14 Uses in Historic Structures C C C C C C D Temporary Uses 1 Temporary Uses as prescribed in Section 17 04 070 and subtect to P P P P P P those provisions 2 Temporary trailers for use in contuncbon with religious and C C C C C C agricultural uses for a specified interim period P =Permitted Use C =Conditional Use Permit requued Special Use Regulations Agricultural Uses Prior to development, the following agricultural uses are either permitted or conditionally permitted on lots of 2 5 acres or more • a Permitted Uses EXHIBIT "A-1" ~_J 17 oa-4 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17 08 030 Notes • (A) Young animals bom to a permitted animal kept on the site maybe kept until such animals a2 weaned (cats and dogs - 4 months, large animals - 6 months, horses - 12 months) (B) As established by Conditional Use Permit review (C) A minimum of 20,000 square feet ollot is required to maintain these ammals (D) More than 5 birds or rodents per each 5,000 square /eet of site area maybe permitted subtect to approval o/ a Conditional Use Permit (E) A pony, which is defined as any horse measunng 14 hands and 2 inches or less in height at fhe withers, maybe kept in addrhon to the keeping of two horses or rn lieu of two horses, three ponies maybe kept on a 20,000 square /pot lot Home Occupations The use of a residence for business purposes shall be permitted sublect to issuance of a Home Occupation Permit (See Section 1704 060) Mobile Homes One mobile home is permitted on a lot in a residential Distnct, except Very Low, sublect to the following requirements The mobile home is placed on a permanent foundation system in compliance with all applicable building regulations The mobile home construction is certified under the National Mobile Home Construction and Safety Standards Act of 1974 and which was constructed after October of 1976 Documentation indicating certification and construction date • must be submitted to the Building and Safety Division in order to secure valid budding permit(s) The Design Review Committee shall determine if the placement of the mobile home is compatible to the immediate area in which it is being placed in accordance with Section 17 06 010 and the following criteria (1) The design of the mobile home unit shall be similar in character and appearance to other dwellings in the area for such things as unit size, roof overhangs, roof materials and exterior materials (2) All building setbacks, parking, coverage, height, width and sign requrements of the base District shall apply Recreational Vehicle Storage Yard The parking and storage of recreational vehicles in proximity to residential users shall be permitted only on lots of 2 acres or more unless part of a master planned development, sublect to approval of a Conditional Use Permit All storage activities shall be screened from public view by a combination of block or masonry wall, berming, dense landscaping, or building mass Retail or wholesale activity, Commercial dismantling, repay or storage wrecking activities or the storage of funk or salvage materials or dismantled parts are prohibited Second Dwelling Units Permitted sublect to • and the following cntena EXHIBIT "A-2" ~ I 17 OS-7 3/01 Rancho Cucamon¢a Development Code Section 17 08 030 a The unit may be constructed as an accessory budding or attached to the pnmary residence on aparcel in asingle-family residential district b The unit is not for sale, but for rental purposes only, or use by a member of the immediate family c The lot contains an existing single-family detached residence, and does not contain a guest house d The unit shall not exceed 640 square feet ~f the parcel is less than 20,000 square feet, rf greater than 20,000 square feet, the second unit can exceed 640 square feet but may not be greater than 950 square feet or 30 percent of the main dwelling unit, rf attached (Und size is exclusive of encosed parking space requirement ) Lot Size A second dwelling unit may be established on a lot or parcel of land hawng a minimum of 10,000 square feet Height A detached second dwelling unit shall be limited to one story, shall not exceed 16 feet in height, and shall not exceed the height of the mom dwelling unit e The unit shall have a separate entrance from the main residence f The unit shall provide parking and access per Chapter 17 12 and provide one enclosed parking space per bedroom, not to exceed two enclosed spaces per unit The enclosed parking space shall not be located in the regwred front or side yard setback for the pnmary unit Temporary removable units shall provide one off-street parking space g The urnt construction shall conform to the site development criteria applicable to accessory buildings or additions to main residence in the base distrid in which the unit is located h. The unit shall match the architectural style of the primary residence in design features such as, but not limited to, material, colors, roofing, scale, surface treatments, and details. i. The unit shall conform to the Hillside and/or Equestrian Overlay District in which it is located. ~ The use of temporary/removable structures for a second dwelling unit shall be limited to the sole occupancy of one or two adult persons who are 60 years of age or over and related to the occupants of pnmary residence by blood, mamage, or adoption Further, said structure shall be restricted to the area at the rear of the primary residence and adequately screened from public view from the street 1 k The applicant shall submit to the Bwiding and Safety Division written certification from the affected water and sewer distract that adequate water and sewer facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed unit For units using septic facilities allowable by the Santa Ana Regional Quality Control Board and the City, EXHIBIT "A-3" 17 08-8 3/01 r H E ANC 8 O I T Y O F U C A M O N G A StaffRepart DATE February 12, 2003 TQ Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FRgyt Brad Buller, Clty Planner gY; Ruben Warren, Planning Techniaan SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO INITIATE DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to consider amending the Development Code regarding second dwelling units per Assembly BIII 1866 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Our current review process for a second dwelling unit requires a Condibonal Use Permit with neighbor notrficebon and a City Planner public heanng. The State recently passed Assembly Bill 1866 when; the approval of a second dwelling unit becomes a ministerial act and a local agency is prohibited from requinng a discretionary permit, to be effective July 1, 2003. However, the City can continue to regulate development standards such as parking ratio, setback, lot coverage, architectural review, size of units, and so forth. Essentially, the new State Law mandates that the City Planner approve the second dwelling unit if it meets appligble City development standards through the plan check process. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission direct staff to initiate an amendment to the Development Code for consistency with Assembly Bill 1866. Respectfully submitted, s Brad Buller City Planner BB~RW:Is Attachments. Exhibit "A" - Assembly Bill 1866, Section 2 • Il~n ~~ - 7 - Ch. 1062 of amts for which committed assistance was not provided If a city or county does not amend its housing element to identify adequate sties to address any shortfall, or fails to complete the rehabilitation, acquisition, purchase of affordabdrty covenants, or the preservation of any housing amt within two years after committed assistance was provided to that unit, rt shall be prohibited from identifying amts pursuant to subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) of paragraph (2) in the housing element that rt adopts for the next planning penod, as defined in Section 65588, above the number of amts actually provided or preserved due to committed assistance SEC. 2. Section 65852.2 of the Government Code u amended to read. 65852 2 (a) (1) Any local agency may, by ordinance, Provide for the creation of second amts insingle-family and multifamily testdential woes. The ordinance may do any of the following: (A) Designate areas within the Junsdiction of the local agency where sewnd amts may be permitted The designation of areas may be based on coterie, that may include, but are not limited to, the adequacy of water and sewer semces and the ttirpact of second amts on traffic flow (B) Impose standards on second units that include, but ere not limited to, parlang, height, setback, lot coverage, arohitectural review, maximum size of a amt, and standards that prevent adverse impacts on any real property that is listed in the Cahfomta Register of I3tstonc Places (C) Provide that second amts do not exceed the allowable density for the lot upon which the second amt is located, and that second amts are a residential use that is consistent with the existing general plan and caning designation for the lot. (2) The ordinance shall notbe considered in the application of any local ordinance, policy, or program to limit residential growth. (3) When a local agency receives its first application on or after July 1, 2003, for a permit pursuant to this subdivision, the application shall be considered mmistenally without discretionary review or a heanng, notwithstanding Section 65901 or 65906 or any local ordinance regulating the issuance of vanances or special use permits Nothing in this paragraph may be construed to requue a local government to adopt or amend an ordinance for the creation of second amts. A local agency may charge a fee to reimburse tt for costs that it incurs as a result of amendments to iliis paragraph enacted dunng the 2001-02 Regular Session of the Legislature, including the costs of adopting or amending any ordinance that provides for the creation of second units. (b) (1) When a local agency which has not adopted an ordinance governing second amts in accordance with subdivision (a) or (c) receives 90 EXHIBIT "A" 1 I ~~iz/a3 Ch 1062 - 8 - its fast application on or after July 1, 1983, for a permit pursuant to this subdivision, the local agency shall accept the application and approve or disapprove the apphcaaon mrmstenally without discretionary review pursuant to this subdivision unless rt adopts an ordinance m accordance with subdivision (a) or (c) within 120 days after receiving the apphcaaon Notwithstanding Section 65901 or 65906, every local agency shall grant a vanance or special use persist for the creation of a second unit >f the second unit complies with all of the followuig (A) The unit is not intended for sale and may be rented. (B) The lot is zoned for single-family or multifamily use. (C) The lot contains an existing single-family dwelling. (D) The second unit is either attached to the existing dwelling and located within the living area of the existing dwelling or detached fiom the existing dwelling and located on the same lot as the existing dwelling. (E) The increased floor area of an attached second unit shall not exceed 30 percent of the exstug living area. (F) The total area of floorspace for a detached second unit shall not exceed 1,200 square feet (G) Requnements relating to height, setback, lot coverage, arolutecairal review, site plan renew, fees, charges, and other zoning requu+emenis generally applicable to residential consaucaon in the zone in which the property is located. (l;) Local building code requuemeau which apply to detached dwellings, as appropnate. (n Approval by the local health officer where a pnvate sewage disposal system is beuig used, ,f requaed. (2) No other local ordinance, policy, or regulation shall be the basis for the denial of a building pemut or a use permit under this subdivision. (3) This subdivision establishes the maximum standards that local agencies shall use to evaluate proposed second units on lots zoned for residential use which contain m existing single-family dwelling No additional standards, other than those provided m this subdivision or subdivision (a), shall be utilized or imposed, except that a local agency may requve an applicant for a pemvt issued pursuant to this subdivision to be an owner-occupant. (4) No changes in zoning ordinances or other ordinances or any changes in the general plan shall be requued to implement this subdivision. Any local agency may amend its zoning ordinance or general plan to inwrporare the policies, procedures, or other provisions applicable to the creation of second amts if these provisions are consistent with the hmitaaons of this subdivision. 90 ~~ ~~ - 9 - Ch 1062 (5) A second amt which conforms to the requuements of this subdivision shall not be wnsidered to exceed the allowable density for the lot upon which rt is located, and shall be deemed to be a residential use which is consistent with the existing general plan and zoning designations for the lot The second amts shall not be wasidered in the application of any local ordinance, policy, or program to limit residential !~~ (c) No local agency shall adopt an ordinance which totally precludes second amts within single-fiumly or multrfamdy caned areas unless the ordinance contains findings acknowledging that the ordinance may limit housing opporhuuties of the region and further wntauis findings that specific adverse impacts on the public health, safety, and welfare that would result from allowing second units within single-family and miiltifamily coned areas justify adopting the ordinance. (d) A local agency may establish muiimum and maximum amt size requnements for both attached and detached second amts No minimum or maximum size for a second amt, or size based upon a percentage of the existing dwelLng, shat! be established by ordinance for either attached or detached dwellings which does not permit at least an efficiency unit to be constructed in wmpliance with local development standards. - (e) parking regwrements for second units shall not exceed one padang space per amt or per bedroom. Addihoml parking may be requned provided drat a findingg is made that the additional parkurg requirements are directly related to the use of the sewed amt and are wnsistent with existing neighborhood standards applicable to existing dwellings. Off-street parking shall be permitted m setback areas m locations determined by the local agency or through tandem parking, unless specific findings are made that parking in setback areas or tandem parking is not feasible based upon specific site or regional topographical or fire and life safety wnditions, or that n is not permitted anywhere else m the~unsdiction (f) Fees charged for the constmction of second amts shall be determined in accordance with Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 66000). (g) Thrs section does not Lmit the authonty of local agencies to adopt less restnctive requirements for the creation of sewed amts. (h) Local agencies shall submit a wpy of the ordinances adopted pursuant to subdivision (a) or (c) to the Department of Housing and Commumty Development within 60 days after adoption. (i) As used in this section, the following terms mean• I Fri Ch 1062 - 10 - (1) "Lrving area," means the interior habitable area of a dwelling untt including basements and attics but does not include a garage or any accessory structure. (2) `Local agency" mesas a crty, county, or crty and county, whether general law or chartered. (3) For purposes of thrs section, "netghborhood" has the same meaning as set forth in Section 65589.5 (4) "Second rinrt" means an attached or a detached resrdential dwelling amt whrch provrdes complete independent living facrhhes for one or more persons. It shall include permanent provtstons for living, sleeping, eating, cooking, and samtahon on the same parcel as the Burgle-faintly dwelling u srtuated A second amt also includes dre following: (A) An efficiency amt, as defined in Section 17958.1 of Health and Safety Code (B) A manufactured home, as defined in Section 18007 of the Health and Safety Code ~) Nothutg in this section shall be construed to supersede or in any way alter or lessen the effector application of the Cahfortva Coastal Act (Dtvtston 20 (commencing wrth Section 30000) of the Public Resources Code), except that the-local govertrment shall not be required to hold public hearings for coastal development permit applications for second rintts. SEC 3 Section 65915 of the Government Code is ammded to read. 65915 (a) When an applicant proposes a houstrtg development within the~unsdtction of a city, county, or city and county, that local govemment shall provide the applicant incentives or concessions for the production of housing amts as prescribed in this chapter. All tines, counties, or crhes and counties shall adopt an ordinance that specifies how compliance with flits section will be ttnplemented. (b) A city, county, or city and county shall either grant a density bonus and at least one of the concessions or incentives identified in subdivision (j), or pronde other incentives or concessions of eginvalent financial value based upon the land cost per dwelling amt, when the applicant for the housing development agrees or proposes to construct at least any one of the followug• (1) Twenty percent of the total amts of a housing development for lower income households, as defined m Section 50079.5 of the Health and Safety Code (2) Ten percent of the total amts of a housurg development For very low income households, as defined in Section 50105 of the Health and Safety Code 90 I O RESOLUTION NO 03-74 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2003-00348, A REQUEST TO AMEND SECTION 17.08, RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA DEVELOPMENT CODE REGARDING SECOND DWELLING UNITS WITHIN THE VERY LOW, LOW, AND LOW-MEDIUM (.1-2, 2-4, AND 4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE, RESPECTIVELY) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS TO COMPLY WITH ASSEMBLY BILL 1866, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals 1 The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Development Code Amendment DRC2003-00348, as descnbed in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Code Amendment request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 14th day of May 2003, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and concluded said heanng on that date . 3 All legal prerequisites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the Crty of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 The Planning Commission hereby spec~cally finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon substantial evidence presented to the Planning Commission dunng the above-referenced public heanng on May 14, 2003, including wntten and oral staff reports, together Hnth public testimony, the Planning Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The State of Caldomia recently passed Assembly Bdl 1866, which was signed into law by the Governor and mandates that second dwelling units be handled as a ministenal action (i.e ,without discretionary review) for the express purpose of providing affordable housing in the state, and b The proposed amendment applies to property located in the Very Low, Low, and Low-Medium Residential Distracts within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and c The application would implement Assembly Bdl 1866 by modifying the land use regulations table applicable to the Residential Distracts to allow second dwelling units as a permitted use within the Very Low, Low, and Low-Medium Residential Distracts, and d The proposed amendments will not have a significant impact on the environment 1 1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 03-74 DCA DRC2003-00348 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA May 14, 2003 Page 2 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the Planning Commission dunng the above-referenced public heanng, and upon the specific findings of facts set forth ~n paragraphs 1 and 2 above, the Planning Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a. The proposed amendment does not conflict vwth the Land Use Polices of the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and with related development. The amendment will offer compliance v~nth State Assembly Bdl 1866, which mandates that approval of a second dwelling unit be a ministenal act, and prohibits a discretionary permit, effective July 1, 2003. b The proposed amendment, together with the conditions applicable thereto, vwll not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or matenally intunous to properties or improvements in the vicnity This amendment eliminates regwrements which wdl become void, and c The application is consistent with the objectives of the Development Code 4 The Planning Commission hereby finds and determines that the project identified in this Resolution is in compliance with the Cal~fomia Environmental Quality Ad of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, and further, specifically finds that based on substantial evidence, it can be seen with certainty that there ~s no possibility that the proposed amendment well have a signrficant effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed amendment is exempt pursuant to Section 15061 of the State CEQA Guidelines 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, the Planning Commission recommends approval of Development Code Amendment DRC2003-00348, as shown in the attached Ordinance 6 The Secretary shall certrfy to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF MAY 2003 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Laity T McNiel, Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certrfy that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of May 2003, by the following vote-to-Hnt `~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 03-74 DCA DRC2003-00348 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA . May 14, 2003 Page 3 AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES. COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS ~I3 ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2003-00348, A REQUEST TO AMEND SECTION 17.08 030, RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA DEVELOPMENT CODE REGARDING SECOND DWELLING UNITS WITHIN THE VERY LOW, LOW, AND LOW-MEDIUM (1-2, 2-4, AND 4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE, RESPECTIVELY) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS TO COMPLY WITH ASSEMBLY BILL 1866, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A. Rentals. 1 On May 14, 2003, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng with respect to the above referenced Development Code Amendment and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted its Resolution No 03-74, recommending that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt said amendment. 2 On ,the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the amendment to the Development Code 3 All legal preregwsites pnor to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred B Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows SECTION 1: This City Councl hereby speafically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Rentals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2 Based upon substantial evidence presented to the City Counnl dunng the above-referenced public heanng on ,including wntten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, the City Councl hereby speafically finds as follows. a The State of Califomia recently passed Assembly Bill 1866, which was signed into law by the Governor and mandates that second dwelling units be handled as a mimstenal action (i a ,without discretionary review) for the express purpose of providing affordable housing in the state, and b The proposed amendment applies to property located in the Very Low, Low, and Low-Medwm Residential Distracts within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and c. The application would implement Assembly Bill 1866 by modifying the land use regulations table applicable to the Residential Distracts to allow second dwelling units as a permitted use within the Very Low, Low, and Low-Medwm Residential Distracts, and d. The subtect amendment identified in this Ordinance is exempt from the regwrements of the Califorrna Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Gwdelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of Division 6 Title 14 of the California Code of Regulation ~' CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO DCA DRC2003-00348 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Page 2 SECTION 3• Development Code Section 17 08 030, Table 17 08 030 -Use Regulations for Residential Distracts, is hereby amended to change second dwelling urnts to a permitted use in the Very Low, Low, and Low-Medium Residential Distracts, in words and figures, as shown in the attached Exhibit "A-1 " SECTION 4 Development Code Section 17.08 030.E. -Special Use Regulations, is hereby amended to read, in words and figures, as shown in Exhibit "A-2" and "A-3 " SECTION 5 If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Ordinance is, for any reason, deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent tunsdiction, or preempted by legislative enactment, such decision or legislation shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance The City Counal of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or words thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, clauses, phrases, or words might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional or preempted by subsequent legislation. SECTION 6 The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California `~ Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17 08 030 USE VL L LM M MH H 17 Ubhty or Sernce Facility C C C C C C C Accessory Uses 1 Accessory Structure P P P P P P 2. Antenna P P P P P P 3 Caretaker's Residence C C C C C C 4. Guest House P P P - - - 5 Home Occupation P P P P P P 6 Lodging Umt P P P - - - 7 Other Accessory Uses P P P P P P 8 Pnvate Garage P P P P P P 9 Pnvate Swimming Pool P P P P P P 10 Second Dwelling Umt (including F P P elder cottage) 11 Recreational Vehicle Storage Yard - C C C C C 12 Feed 8 Tack Store (if accessory to C commercial stable) 13 Dormdory (rf accessory to college or C C C C C C school) 14 Uses in Historic Structures C C C C C C D Temporary Uses 1 Temporary Uses as prescribed in Section 17 04 070 and subject to P P P P P P those provisions 2 Temporary traders for use in wnlunction wdh religious and C C C C C C agricultural uses for a speafied interim period P = Permitted Use C = CondR~onal Use Permit requued Special Use Regulations Agricultural Uses Prior to development, the following agricultural uses are either permitted or conditionally permitted on lots of 2 5 acres or more Permitted Uses ~~ EXHIBIT "A-1" ~ I 17 os-4 Rancho Cucamonea Development Code Section 17 08 030 Notes • (A) Young ammo/s bom to a permitted animal kept on the site maybe kept until such ammals are weaned (cats and dogs - 4 months, large ammals - 6 months, horses - 12 months) (B) As established by Condrbonal Use Permit rewew (C) A minimum of 20,000 square /eet of lot rs required to maintain these ammals (D) More than 5 bads or rodents per each 5,000 square /eet of site area maybe permitted subtect to approval of a CondNOnal Use Permit (E) A pony, which rs defined as any horse measuring 14 hands and 2 inches or less rn height et the withers, maybe kept rn addrt~on to the keeping of two horses or m lieu of two horses, three ponies maybe kept on a 20, 000 square foot lot 3 Home Occupations The use of a residence for business purposes shall be permitted subject to issuance of a Home Occupation Permd (See Section 1704 060) 4 Mobile Homes One mobile home is permitted on a lot in a residential District, except Very Low, subject to the following requirements a The mobile home is placed on a permanent foundation system in compliance with all applicable budding regulations b The mobile home construction is certified under the National Mobile Home Construction and Safety Standards Act of 1974 and which was constructed after • October of 1976 Documentation indicating certification and construction date must be submitted to the Bwlding and Safety Division in order to secure valid budding permit(s) c The Design Review Committee shall determine if the placement of the mobile home is compatible to the immediate area in which it is being placed in accordance with Section 17 O6 010 and the following criteria (1) The design of the mobile home unit shall be similar in character and appearance to other dwellings in the area for such things as unit size, roof overhangs, roof materials and exterior materials (2) All bwlding setbacks, parking, coverage, height, width and sign regwrements of the base District shall apply Recreational Vehicle Storage Yard The parking and storage of recreational vehicles in proximity to residential users shall be perimtted only on lots of 2 acres or more unless part of a master planned development, subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit a All storage actiwties shall be screened from public view by a combination of block or masonry wall, berming, dense landscaping, or budding mass Retail or wholesale actmty, Commercial dismantling, repair or storage wrecking activdies or the storage of junk or salvage materials or dismantled parts are proh~bded 6 Second Dwellino Units Permitted subject to and the following criteria EXHIBIT "A-2" ~ I ~'" 17 08-7 3/01 Rancho Cucamonea Development Code Section 17 08 030 The unit may be constructed as an accessory building or attached to the primary • residence on aparcel in asingle-family residential district The unit is not for sale, but for rental purposes only, or use by a member of the immediate family The lot contains an existing single-family detached residence, and does not contain a guest house d. The unit shall not exceed 640 square feet rf the parcel is less than 20,000 square feet, rf greater than 20,000 square feet, the second unit can exceed 640 square feet but may not be greater than 950 square feet or 30 percent of the main dwelling unit, rf attached (Unit size is excluswe of enclosed parking space regwrement ) Lot Size A second dwelling unit may be established on a lot or parcel of land having a minimum of 10,000 square feet Height A detached second dwelling unit shall be limited to one story, shall not exceed 16 feet in height, and shall not exceed the height of the main dwelling and e The unit shall have a separate entrance from the main residence f The unit shall provide parking and access per Chapter 17 12 and provide one enclosed parking space per bedroom, not to exceed two enclosed spaces per unit The enclosed parking space shall not be located in the required front or • side yard setback for the pnmary unit Temporary removable unds shall provide one off-street parking space g The and construction shall conform to the sde development criteria applicable to accessory buildings or additions to main residence in the base district in which the unit is located h. The unit shall match the architectural style of the primary restdenee in design features such as, but not limited to, material, colors, roofing, scale, surface treatments, and details. i. The unit shall con/orm to the Hillside and/or Equestrian Overlay District in which it is located. ~ The use of temporary/removable structures for a second dwelling and shall be limited to the sole occupancy of one or two adult persons who are 60 years of age or over and related to the occupants of pnmary residence by blood, marriage, or adoption Further, said structure shall be restricted to the area at the rear of the pnmary residence and adequately screened from public view from the street l k The applicant shall submit to the Building and Safety Division written certification from the affected water and sewer district that adequate water and sewer facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed unit For units using septic facilites allowable by the Santa Ana Regional Quality Control Board and the City, EXHIBIT "A-3" I _6 3/01 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Sectron 17 08 030 a The unit may be constructed as an accessory building or attached to the primary residence on a parcel in asingle-family residential d~stnct b The unit is not for sale, but for rental purposes only, or use by a member of the immediate family c The lot contains an existing single-family detached residence, and does not contain a guest house d The unit shall not exceed 640 square feet if the parcel is less than 20,000 square feet, if greater than 20,000 square feet, the second unit can exceed 640 square feet but may not be greater than 950 square feet or 30 percent of the main dwelling unit, if attached (Unit size is exclusive of enclosed parking space regwrement ) Lot Size A second dwelling unit may be established on a lot or parcel of land having a minimum of 10,000 square feet Height A detached second dwelling unit shall be limited to one story, shall not exceed 16 feet in height, and shall not exceed the height of the main dwelling unit e The unit shall have a separate entrance from the main residence f The unit shall provide parking and access per Chapter 17 12 and provide one enclosed parking space per bedroom, not to exceed two enclosed spaces per unit The enclosed parking space shall not be located in the required front or side yard setback for the pnmary umt Temporary removable units shall provide one off-street parking space g The unit construction shall conform to the site development cntena applicable to accessory buildings or additions to main residence in the base district in which the umt is located h. The unit shall match the architectural style of the primary residence m design features, such as but not Irm~ted to, material, colors, rooting, scale, surface treatments, and details. r The unit shall conform to the Hillside and/or Equestrian Overlay Distract in which it is located. _ j: t The use of temporary/removable structures for a second dwelling unit shall be restricted to the area ~ at the rear of the pnmary residence and adhere to all development cntena in y , this section. _ _ _ .. ~. ...... n,.. ~ k T6 '~ a .....~ .........~M •.. C....L.... ~7flR C __ 1 k The applicant shall submit to the Bwlding and Safety Division written certification from the affected water and sewer district that adequate water and sewer facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed unit For units using septic facilities allowable by the Santa Ana Regional Quality Control Board and the City, EXHIBIT "A-3" 17 08-8 3/01 f'J~ a-' fI8 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 03-74 DCA DRC2003-00348 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA May 14, 2003 Page 2 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the Planning Commission dunng the above-referenced public heanng, and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, the Planning Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a The proposed amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan, the ob~edives of the Development Code, and with related development The amendment will offer compliance with State Assembly Bill 1866, which mandates that approval of a second dwelling unit be a ministenal act, and prohibits a discretionary permit, effective July 1, 2003 b The proposed amendment, together wrath the conditions applicable thereto, wall not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or matenally intunous to properties or improvements in the vicinity This amendment eliminates requirements which well become void, and c The application is consistent with the obtectives of the Development Code 4 The Planning Commission hereby finds and determines that the project identified in this Resolution is in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, and further, specifically finds that based on substantial evidence, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed amendment well have a signficant effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed amendment is exempt pursuant to Section 21080.17 of the Public Resource Code and Section 15282(1) 4a064{b)(3) of Division 6 Title 14 of the California Code of Regulation 5 Based upon the findmgs and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, the Planning Commission recommends approval of Development Code Amendment DRC2003-00348, as shown in the attached Ordinance The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF MAY 2003 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Lany T McNiel, Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of May 2003, by the following vote-to-wit ~~ ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2003-00348, A REQUEST TO AMEND SECTION 17 08 030, RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA DEVELOPMENT CODE REGARDING SECOND DWELLING UNITS WITHIN THE VERY LOW, LOW, AND LOW-MEDIUM (1-2, 2-4, AND 4-B DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE, RESPECTIVELY) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS TO COMPLY WITH ASSEMBLY BILL 1866, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A Recitals 1 On May 14, 2003, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng with respect to the above referenced Development Code Amendment and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted its Resolution No 03-74, recommending that the City Councl of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt said amendment 2. On June 4, 2003, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the amendment to the Development Code All legal prerequisites pnor to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred B Ordinance The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows SECTION 1 This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct SECTION 2 Based upon substantial evidence presented to the City Councl dunng the above-referenced public heanng on June 4, 2003, including wntten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, the City Council hereby specifically finds as follows a The State of California recently passed Assembly Bill 1866, which was signed into law by the Governor and mandates that second dwelling units be handled as a ministenal action (i e , Hnthout discretionary review) for the express purpose of providing affordable housing in the state, and b The proposed amendment applies to property located m the Very Low, Low, and Low-Medium Residential Distncts vnthin the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and c The application would implement Assembly Bill 1866 by modifying the land use regulations table applicable to the Residential Distncts to allow second dwelling units as a permitted use within the Very Low, Low, and Low-Medum Residential Distncts, and d The subtect amendment identified in this Ordinance is exempt from the regwrements of the Cal~fomia Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 21080.17 of the Public Resource Code and Section 15282(1) 450r~(3) of Division 6 Title 14 of the Calrfomia Code of Regulation ~~ ~y T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE May 14, 2003 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, Clty Planner BY Brent Le Count, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00237 - ROBINSON'S MAY - A request to construct a two story, 180,080 square foot department store (Robinson's May) within the Vlctona Gardens Regional Center In the Mixed Use District of the • Vlctona Community Plan, located north of Foothill Boulevard, south of Church Street, between Day Creek Boulevard and the I-15 Freeway - APN 0227-161-48 and 49, 0227-171-36, 0227-201-35 and 45 thru 48, and 0227-211-30 and 39 thru 43 This action is within the scope of the protect reviewed In an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (State Clearinghouse No 20010301028) prepared for Development Agreement 01-02, Vlctona Community Plan Amendment 01-01, and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTT15716 Said EIR was certified by the City Council on February 20, 2002, and no additional environmental review for the discretionary actions mentioned In this notice Is required pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Backoround The project is located within phase one of the Victoria Gardens Regional Center, the design review for which was approved by the Planning Commission In November of 2002 Robinson's May, along with the other "major" tenants (Macy's, JCPenny, and one other as yet unknown tenant), are subtect to their own independent design rewew On January 22, 2003, the applicant had a Workshop with the Planning Commission to review the protect design The Commission discussed areas of concern Including variation In colors and materials, use of cornices, reducing the boxy appearance of the building, screening and buffering the loading dock from visual Intrusion, as well as • seasonal winds out of the east, and that the design of the building and surrounding landscaping should be sensitive to the pedestrian experience ITEM G PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2003-00237 - ROBINSON MAY May 14, 2003 • Page 2 B Surrounding Land Use and Zoning The site ~s surrounded by vacant land planned for various shops and restaurants and active open space elements of the Victoria Gardens Regional Center, which is a Mixed Use Distract in the Victoria Community Plan C General Plan Designations The site and surrounding area are designated Mixed Use per the General Plan D Site Characteristics The site is occupied by remnant vineyards and slopes gently from north to south at approximately 2 to 3 percent Day Creek Boulevard and Church Street are under construction to the west and north, respectively Access to the site wdl be provided by the internal circulation system of the Regional Center accessed by the aforementioned streets, as well as the planned Victoria Gardens Loop to the south and east E Parking Calculations The site is surrounding by large parking fields to be developed with Victoria Gardens The overall center is parked at a ratio of 4 5 spaces per 1,000 square feet This parking ratio was arnved at as a result of a special parking study done for the Regional Center ANALYSIS • A General The building will be located on the south side of the future South Main Street within the center, at the southerly terminus of the Town Green (the bwlding's north entrance is aligned with the Town Green) There are vast parking fields to the south, smaller parking lots on the east and west sides of the bwldmg, and on-street parallel parking along the north side of the budding on South Main Street All four sides of the building will have pedestnan entrances all of which utilize glass, colored stucco, decorative cornice work, and horizontal change of bwldmg plane to prove visual interest and a sense of arrival Also, all of the entrances will have double door foyers There is a truck loading dock proposed on the southeast corner of the bwldmg The dock area is actually tucked under the second floor and a screen wall that appears to continue the first floor along the south elevation is provided in order to conceal the existence of the loading dock Finally, the entire perimeter of the bwldmg is proposed to be at the same grade level so that customers do not have to go up or down steps B Design Review Committee The Committee (McNeil, Coleman) reviewed the project on April 15, 2003, and requested that the utility enclosure be restudied and brought back for further review The Committee reviewed the revised design on May 6, 2003, and recommended approval subject to providing additional landscaping C Technical Review Committee The Grading and Technical Review Committees have reviewed the protect and recommend approval subject to conditions outlined in the attached Resolution of Approval D Environmental Assessment On February 20, 2002, the City Council adopted a Protect Environmental Impact Report as environmental clearance for the various agreements and entitlements associated with the Victoria Gardens Regional Center The current Development Review is consistent with the scope of work and type of development ~, a PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2003-00237 - ROBINSON MAY • May 14, 2003 Page 3 analyzed by the protect Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Furthermore, there have been no changes m the circumstances surrounding the protect nor has new information surfaced to indicate that the project wdl have substantial environmental impacts beyond those discussed m the EIR Therefore, no subsequent or supplemental EIR is necessary. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of DRC2003-00237 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval. Respectfully submitted, Braller City Planner BB•BLC\ma Attachments. Exhibit "A" Exhibit "B" . Exhibit "C" Exhibit "D" Exhibit "E" Exhibit "F" Exhibit "G" Exhibit "H" Exhibit "I" Draft Resol - Location Map - Site Plan - Grading Plan - Landscape Plan - Floor Plans - Roof Plan - Elevations and Illustratives - Sidewalk Studies - Design Review Committee Minutes dated Apnl 15 and May 6, 2003 ution of Approval for DRC2003-00237 "1 P~ 1 ,i T U ROBINSONS • MAY A DIVISION OF THE MAY DEPARTMENT STORES COMPANY AT VICTORIA GARDENS RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DEVELOPMENT/DESIGN REVIEW ~ •[lt <ORLORRN ••EO CiRTEE rc ...~.°.°. "~°,.... ~~ ~.. •., ..~ • •- • • •••••• ••- ' "~'"°' °"'° INITIAL SUBMITTAL - ~_ ,-_ MARCH 11, 2003 LOCATION MAP SITE PLAN DRAWING INDEX -- -- -- - I 3 nwoaar«.aas• . 9II _ __ N " d Ee~II1~~ __- _ routtum¢ts m PNMNNNe § ~ ~ y~wES~u 1NEIREti~1 RNIII~ = II II ) ~ i1 I'RM I l ~ -~ I eP~ 1 lAA t6 3 I - _ I I ~ " 1 0 ~ ® p 1 n¢M " ^ AM Q ^~ tl WIIER Q V ' II ~M1~ 1 e e ~ PROJECT DATA "" '~ " PDBQ~bOI~S MAY r~aeR.Rrooa~o,u a _ _ .~Pµe.r. -- e ~ _ o~ ~ " ' ,.,.,e~,~,o.~. [~w ~ ,p ^ COVER SHEET II ~ ~ d less __ __ -_ -b:- -~ __ _~__ _ ______m_ CONCEPT OESION _1 ~[al tl S I l ~ v t°i • 4 p g g ~@ A 3 € S ~ Q 9 ~ ~Y~ ~~~ ~~~ ~8 8 o' ~~ ~ ~ ~a~ ~ . l~ qq ~ ~i x R ~ ~ ~ u , ,~ e R l! • i t ~ f i ~ o W ~ R ii € ~ R '/Yi G}I'f _ '~/ 11l ~+ c c, G 9EE SHEET NO 1] 0 N W W N =~~ . BEE BNEEi NO ~1 00 R~~~~~NCE ONLY HALF SIZE D~,WI~IGS '"'~ VICTORIA GARDENS TREE PLADTIDG LEGEBD ~ ^ o- _~------ - ~:~ i LIMIT OE WORK LIMIT OE WORN SHRUB & GROUDD COVER PLADTIOG LEGEDD PLAB TIBG DOTES ® m ® ~ µ a e ur..e r..rw vuum e~r~nv~ ® ® ® VI ICI /~1 ~t-T~ vs~e~~onsv ari¢~muwnmw~nv~tis•~..i III 'UI IIn o t..A.l~ I~/k~OJ ^ ~~ fi~~ ~ ~ ~ ® unY S~rvle~ Y~rl ® Call LOLL fR[E ® 0 1-BGO 422-4133 ®.. . ~. Q • .-... , I~ it !~l ~~ iii f~' P•5c1~emWk RmtYy ~°"" S~} v ~du I, }~ ei ~ E F 3 B j C ~~~~ ' gi a ~~$~ p ~ ~~~3~~ ®r - ® - - - _- _ ® - -- 133L15 ~ % ' ': 3 u 0 ~ J~ a ,g r a ~`o " ~U ~ 0 ~ ~ o~ ~ I Q I ~.~~~. ~~~ ~~_-- -- e ~~ __ ~~ $ ~ F W Z C W f0 Q U y~i ,. ® ~ - • J,i e !!1[ v ~ u ~ ~~ ~~i ' J J 3 G e V i V 1. e ~ i s u• ' E a' Q~~~ ~ $ e~ ~~?i# e ~~~~@}@} ~ ~~Yi~5 ~ 133L15 7 y.. _ y~ --- - __ - jl I y-. I 1 I 1 I I .. y., I I I I I I :2 I I I I I " ~ I I I I 1 I I I _ 0 - ~-- I I ---r---r---t---r---r-- ~---r--~--- -- ~ - r--- r / I I I I I ~ I I I I I I ~ .- p ~ I I I I I I p~ I I I S ~ ,. o __ __. _ ~ _ _ _ ~ _ _ ~ _ - _ ~ _ _ I _ _ _~ _ _ ~ _ _ ~ _ - _ ~ _ I I _ _ __ ___ - - Z 9 I I I I I I I I I I 4 " m I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I _ ._ --- ---r---r---t----t---r--~- --- -- --- - --- --- _ - - - r t r I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I--I ---I---I -- I---~ -- I--- I---~ -- ~---I -- I- - F I I I I I I I I I I I W I I I I I I I I I I I I C I I I I I I I I I I I F ----- --r---r---r---r---r---t----t---r---r---r---r--- 'r Z Q -g Y II I I I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I I I I I _ -_ E II I I I I I I I I I ----- ---r---r---+---r---r----r---r---r---r---r- - - ~ r I I I I I I I I I I I ~ I 1 ~' ~ _ p Q p ~, p I I I I I I I I I p I I I I 5~ ~ ~ 4 I I I I I I I ~ 4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -- - I I I I I I I I I I I ---r---r---r---r----r---r---r- --- -- - o r r e I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I \\ I `~ I I I I ~ I I I l I I -- -- -- -- - -- -- -- -- --- --- -- --'~--- - _ ? ~ ~ ~ I I 1 1 I ~ I a l I I I I I 1 I I I B I _ " m -- -- I I 1 I ---r -- I 1 ~ 1 1 --r---r-SSSLLL ,~-~-r-- - 9 1 k I -r--999 -- - ~ r ~ 9 I I I I t I l I ! I I I I I I _' y.. y.. y,. I-- I" I ~- I I I - -- ~- - q1 ' p i I I, I k I - I - I p P I ~P I I I I I I ~ I - I I I I I p p I I I I I I S~ I ~,~ I I I I I I e_y _ -et - o-A[ D-PZ -~ ~p ~' as F W W G N F W Z K W {0 a U ~/ '~ : , < ~i ~la ~ ii [~44 Ile~~e ' ` £ 3 G '~ r o ~ ~ i ~ a z n ° . j' 1; ii=li E a ;~ 0 4 0 ~ ~ U ... ; ...... f;f'; ~!J'•; I r i = r. ~ ~ a a ~¢ 1 ~s ~~ : _ t33als ~ :~ _ : , I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ I r• , f W W C N W C W m U ~) ~ ~ l/-~ i e I I I I _, i I I i ~ I I I I I I I I I I I - ~ - ~ ---r---r-- -- -r--- -- --- --- --- --- --- --- - r r r I r I I r o I I I I I I I I I I ~ I , ~- i I I I I I : I I I ~ I ~ _ U' _ I I I I I I i I I I I _ " ~ 9 m I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I --- I I i I I I I I t ----I---r---r- --- -- ---I--- --- --- I 1 -- ------ - r r I r I y I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I _ 5 f _ _ ___ ~ I I I ~ I I I I W ~ I I I I I I I i I W ~ +t I I I I I I I I F ~ - --- --- --- - --- --- --- -- - --- - ~- -- --- : . r I r I r I r I I p I I I I I I I I I p T '! ~ qq : e eB ~ Q A a ~ ~ ~ I I I I I I I S I l . e ~ E ~` ' I I I I I I ~ I @@ I I ~ - - -r---I---r---I---r---I--- ---r- -I--- --I-- ~ ' I I I I I I I I Q s ~ I I I I I I I I I ' N _ _ _ _ _ I _ I - I _ _ I _ I _ I - - I I I _ _ uQl I I I I I I `I I I I I I I I I I I '~~~ I ~ I I I I I I I I I I I l a - ---I---r---I----I---r---r--- ------ --- --- -- - r r I a : ° I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I t : ~ m -~- __ ___ --I---I- I I --~---I --~---1-- I- -I-- I--- - - ~ I I ~ I 1~ 1 I I I ~ I I I I I I I bbb I I I I ¢ ¢ I I I I I ] ( ~~ I t ~ I g g I # I - - --- --- ---- -- - y~-t-- - r---I- I- -t-- -- - r r ~ 4 ~u I I 1 I I I 7 1 I 1 I I 1 I ' I t \ I - M x, ~. Y~ I I I i I I I I 4 1 I I 1 I p@ I I . 1 I I I I I I3 I I I . I 1 ei ' ~` e I I I I I I I I I I I I I .-u - o-ae - - -~ >~ 33x15 e~1611 R V~ % e ~~%~~6 '!~ F s N I 4~e }!°~} S A E F ~~ z a@ @ 9 ~ s' 8 ~ s ` ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ @ s e ~ gpp . ° A B A A ~ 0 ~ A 4 6 6 6 6 'x` 6 6 6 6 j~i 1~ ^5 F5 Mei?~ 'S IS p p g p R __ ~> ~i ~S -~i-J-- ~~ ~~ ' -y -- ~ LI ~c7^d=rj~{ s W ~ ~ R ~ "=iM1- ~ e ;o.~,.~, ~ ~ ~ ~ p 6666 3 '}.°i, e 3 -_ 1i, .. E~ ~. •~< - ~ 6 8 -- ~~~_ly` ~ 8 ~ ~4 --~~ ~ 3 `~ I 1 ie_ AA'A I S~ g _ ~~ _~ 666 I-~ _ d_ Jl ~ V ~ _ o V im-- _ n9l`jtl/l ~IA~v - P z 6 e 8 ! '~~' % ~ 3~ € p-i ~~ z o n ~ a S + 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ B @ @ p g ~ gg °@ 8 E ~ e e 6 e e S A j~~"~A'~~ tl A ~~ '~ I~~Y~% ~ L.d ii~ 45 1 ~ ,~ ' pia p~ ' 4 ~ -a. _ y y Q e C 5 q p e S 6 A ~ ~~ o -_ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ 5 Y ~~ 60 8 „, a6 r x~, 3 ~r~~~~` ~ -- t 9 s ~ ' ~s~~~ p p 6~ ~a n ..i; w-` ~_.., pv ~ d g 4 9 . . :h,,~6s; ~ ~ Q ~ ~ 4~~/ta3 ~ ~~ G 6 B ~ ~. c.,_ ~ y~ ~ 9 i l ~ 1 D i 36~@ _f. ~ - ES. E~ S a ~ - A -~-P' - 6 _ `y -g __ - = e 6 ~ g ~ i ' ' ~v •~:GS t 37r ~'ra r ~ ~ ae A~~~:f,~i _ ~ ! ~~pf3.~; ~ @ ka~ ~ a ~ _ 666 '. J•'i ~@a~ `j,. ~..~~ ~S• it=`T `tit: I a~.~~3f ~~il aV'~ g ';'~r,~~x> e ,~xp Q a au'.y;y, --__ g ~ ` I --- -~\a f A 6 i u z ~ a1€!It ~ c E ~~7~IE 55 ~ a i 4E{~~i r std' ({4 !+ ~(~s }.{` I ~~ T _e s Y~r . €~ v $~ 9 3' ~ € 1 3 e~~i~, +~j" Si~ Bae ~ a ~ ' "3 t, f tt r--.t~ ~ ' ,~ ~ n " ,e y<q. ' // N .1 .~' f. \~ €~ i JJ 3 F ~ A isF ` ~ W;< i, ~ U b 's a ~t~4 :~~,~x ~ e1~!!i ! u ['a°,~ ~.~ e p S Z " ~ o '~ F tl :r 3. .F' ~ e F ~ ~ O V o ~ ~ .: a_ f;~t`:': ~la~7 a l a j a i Y ~ W Ma $ i Q P ¢g 9 ` i pp Y } e llll~ ~ ! 3 ~ ¢ C V ~ i 1.! [,~! C ~ E~ I f! ~ ~ in t I~ J ' ~ ~ ~' u Q k L''te ~ 4 s~ ~~ 3 0 i Q%ye H ~~ ~ ~€ ~ 0 s< ~~~ ir. , ,. DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7.00 p m. Brent Le Count April 15, 2003 . DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00237 - ROBINSON'S MAY - A request to construct a two story, 180,080 square foot department store (Robinson's May) within the Victoria Gardens Regional Center in the Mixed Use District of the Victoria Community Plan, located north of Foothill Boulevard, South of Church Street, between Day Creek Boulevard and the I-15 Freeway - APN• 0227-262-35, 36, and 38; 0227-171-22 and 23, 0227-201030, 33, 35, and 36, 0227-211-24, 39, and 40 thru 43. Desion Parameters• The budding will be located on the south side of the future South Main Street within the center, at the southerly terminus of the Town Green (the building's north entrance is aligned with the Town Green). There are vast parking fields to the south, smaller parking lots on the east and west sides of the bwldmg, and on-street parallel parking along the north side of the budding on South Mam Street. All four sides of the bwldmg will have pedestrian entrances all of which utilize glass, colored stucco, decorative cornice work, and horizontal change of budding plane to prove visual interest and a sense of arrival. Also, all of the entrances will have double doorfoyers. There is a truck loading dock proposed on the southeast comer of the budding The dock area is actually tucked under the second floor and a screen wall that appears to continue the first floor along the south elevation is provided in order to conceal the existence of the loading dock Finally, the entire perimeter of the bwldmg is proposed to be at the same grade level so that customers do not have to go up or down steps Plannino Commission Workshop On January 22, 2003, the applicant had a Workshop with the Planning Commission to review protect design. The Commission discussed areas of concern including variation in colors and materials, use of cornices, reducing the boxy appearance of the budding, screening and buffering the loading dock from visual intrusion as well as seasonal winds out of the east and that the design of the budding and surrounding landscaping should be sensitive to the pedestrian experience. The attached revised drawings are in response to Commission input. Staff Comments• The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion Secondary Issues: Once all of the mator issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: 1. Provide enhanced paving treatment in the driveway entrance to the loading dock area at the southeast corner of the budding. The intent is to maintain a high level of visual interest relatroe to the pedestrian experience as customers walk by the dock area 2 Provide tree planting staggered relative to the street tree planting within the planters located adtacent to the budding so as to provide a strong tree canopy over the side walks on the east, west, and south sides. 3. Consider providing additional areas of glazing along the base of the building to act as display windows to further enhance casual interest (similar to the glass displays at entry points 4 Provide dense shrub planting (more than 3-foot on center) along the base of the budding to act as a "living" wainscoting since there is only colored stucco proposed for the budding base 5. Provide decorative enhanced paving across private streets connecting each entry to parking lots DRC COMMENTS DRC2003-00237 - ROBINSON'S MAY April 15, 2003 Page 2 6 A bus bay turnout is proposed on the north side of the private street east Robinson's May This bay will eliminate landscaping that would otherwise provide a buffer forthe loading area at the southeast comer of the budding Staff suggests relocating to the west of Robinson's May. Policv Issues• The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the protect design without discussion: 1. Roof egwpment and ground-mounted equipment shall be fully screened from public view, including passers by on the I-15 Freeway. Should screening be necessary, it shall be of the highest architectural and visual quality to match budding architecture. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends that the Design Revew Committee recommend approval of the subfect Development Review application subiect to the above comments and any other comments the Committee may have. Design Review Committee Action• Members Present: Larry McNiel, Dan Coleman Staff Planner: Brent Le Count The applicant presented a reused Site Plan with an Edison transformer and emergency generatorat the southeast comer within a 10-foot high enclosure. The Committee requested that the protect be revised m light of staff's comments and the following additional comments to which the applicant agreed 1 Coordinate with Forest City to re-align the drive aisle immediately to the east of the site m the vianity of the southeast corner The intent is to move the drive aisle easterly so that at least 10 feet of sidewalk/landscape width can be provided from the face of curb to the face of the utility enclosure wall 2 Provide dense landscaping on the northern and southern ends of the utility enclosure near the southeast corner of the budding Include vine planting framed to climb the enclosure walls. 3 Provide a bench or other pedestrian oriented fixture at the base of the east side of the utility enclosure wall and provide a decorative shade overhang element above. 4 Relocate the proposed bus bay east of the southeast comerof the site to provide more room for landscaping to screen the loading dock If relocation is infeasible, then provide as dense as possible landscaping m this area to achieve the screening affect 5 The metal canopies over the main customer entrances shall be extended further out over the sidewalk/entrance. The applicant agreed to an overall dimension of 4 feet. 6 The bwlding surfaces on the north elevation that may be exposed during the interim between construction of the Robinson May store and the two mall shops on the north side shall be painted/treated m a visually attractive fashion A suggestion would be to paint the exposed surfaces to represent a facsimile the future mall shops that will be built there 7 It is not necessary to expand the area of win(d~o~w displays ~\~~' CONSENT CALENDAR COMMENTS 7.00 p m Brent Le Count May 6, 2003 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00237- ROBINSON'S MAY-A requestto construct atwo- story, 180,080 square foot department store (Robinson's May) within the Victoria Gardens Regional Center in the Mixed Use District of the Victoria Community Plan, located north of Foothill Boulevard, south of Church Street, between Day Creek Boulevard and the I-15 Freeway- APN: 0227-161-48 and 49; 0227-171-36; 0227-201-35 and 45 thru 48, and 0227-211-30 and 39 thru 43 This action is within the scope of the project reviewed in an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (State Clearinghouse No. 20010301028) prepared for Development Agreement 01-02, Victoria Commundy Plan Amendment 01-01, and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTT15716. Said EIR was certified by the City Counal on February 20, 2002, and no additional environmental review for the discretionary actions mentioned in this notice is required pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166 Design Review Committee Action Members Present Larry McNiel, Pam Stewart, Dan Coleman Staff Planner Brent Le Count The applicant presented the Committee with a revised plan showing a 10-foot wide driveway on the east side of the bwidmg as measured from the east wall of the equipment enclosure to the curb face The Committee requested that landscaping be provided on the north and south ends of the enclosure to screen the enclosure Ground cover, shrubs, and climbing vines were suggested within the landscaping. The applicant clarified that a planter existed on south side and agreed to duplicate on north side. The Committee recommended approval with this change ~~~ • RESOLUTION NO 03-75 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO DRC2003-00237, A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A TWO STORY, 180,080 SQUARE FOOT DEPARTMENT STORE (ROBINSON'S MAY) WITHIN THE VICTORIA GARDENS REGIONAL CENTER IN THE MIXED USE DISTRICT OF THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN, LOCATED NORTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, SOUTH OF CHURCH STREET, BETWEEN DAY CREEK BOULEVARD AND THE I-15 FREEWAY, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN 0227-161-48 AND 49, 0227-171-36, 0227-201-35 AND 45 THRU 48, AND 0227-211-30 AND 39 THRU 43 A Rentals 1 May Design and Construction filed an application forthe approval of Development Review DRC2003-00237 as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter m this Resolution, the subtect Development Review request is referted to as "the application " 2 On the 14th day of May 2003, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date 3 All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred • B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, detertnined, and resolved bythe Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting on May 14, 2003, mGuding written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby speafically finds as follows a The application applies to property located within the Victoria Gardens Regional Center to be accessed via the internal circulation system of the Center that is connected to Day Creek Boulevard, Church Street, and Victoria Gardens Lane and is presently vacant with remnant vineyards, and b The surrounding property is vacant and occupied by remnant vineyards with Day Creek Boulevard under construction to the west, Church Street under construction to the north, the I-15 Freeway to the east, and Foothill Boulevard to the south, and c The protect is designed with 360-degree architectural quality consistent with the design ob~echves of the Development Code, and • d The protect will provide the community and surrounding region vnth a conveniently accessible retail service, and ~- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 03-75 DRC2003-00237 - ROBINSON'S MAY MAY 14, 2003 . Page 2 e The project is part of the master planned Victona Gardens Regional Center and thus exhibits compatibility with the planned surrounding circulation system and development 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and conGudes as follows a The proposed project is consistent vnth the obtectives of the General Plan, and b The proposed use is in accord with the obtectives of the Development Code and the Victona Community Plan and the purposes of the distnct in which the site is located, and c The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and the Victona Community Plan, and d The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or matenally intunous to properties or improvements in the wGnity 4 The City Councl approved the overall Vctona Gardens Regional Center via entenng into a Development Agreement and a Development Disposition Agreement with the applicant, and by approving a Tentative Parcel Map and Victona Community Plan Amendment on February 20, 2002 . The City Council adopted a Protect Environmental Impact Report as environmental clearance for these agreements and entitlements The current Development Review application is consistent wdh the scope of work and type of development analyzed by the Protect EIR Furthermore, there have been no changes in the circumstances surrounding the protect nor has new information surfaced to indicate that the protect would have substantial environmental impacts beyond those discussed in the EIR Therefore, no subsequent or supplemental EIR is necessary based upon the findings as follows a The protect is within the scope of that evaluated by the Protect Environmental Impact Report for the Victona Gardens Master Plan, Development Agreement, Tentative Parcel Map, and Development Disposition Agreement as certified by the City Council on February 20, 2002 (State Cleannghouse No 20010301028), and b There have been no substantial changes made either to the protect or the circumstances surcounding the protect since the City Council certified the Protect Environmental Impact Report on February 20, 2002, and c No new information of substantial importance has ansen since the Protect EIR was certified to indicate that the protect would have significant effects not discussed in the EIR orthat the mitigation measures imposed are infeasible 5 Notwithstanding any other provision or condition in this Resolution, nothing herein shall be interpreted as a waiver or modification of the approved Development Agreement and Master Plan for Victona Gardens, and in the event of any conflict between this Resolution and the Development Agreement or the Master Plan, the Development Agreement or Master plan shall supersede and be • controlling G ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 03-75 DRC2003-00237 - ROBINSON'S MAY MAY 14, 2003 Page 3 6 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Drvision 1) Provide dense landscaping on the northern and southern ends of the utility encosure near the southeast comer of the budding InGude vine planting trained to climb the enclosure walls 2) Provide a bench or other pedestnan onented fixture at the base of the east side of the utility enclosure wall and provide a decorative shade overhang element above 3) Relocate the proposed bus bay east of the southeast comer of the site to provide more room for landscaping to screen the loading dock If relocation is infeasible, then provide as dense as possible landscaping in this area to achieve this screening effect 4) The metal canopies over the main customer entrances shall be extended further out over the sidewalk/entrance 5) The budding surfaces on the north elevation that may be exposed dunng the intenm between construction of the Robinson's May store and the two mall shops on the north side shall be painted/treated in a visually attractive fashion A suggestion would be to paint the exposed surfaces to represent a facsimile of the future mall shops that will be bwlt there. 6) Roof egwpment and ground-mounted egwpment shall be fully screened from public view, inGudmg motonsts on the I-15 Freeway Should screening be necessary, it shall be the highest architectural and visual quality to match buldng archdecture 7) Provide enhanced paving treatment in the dnveway entrance to the loading dock area at the southeast comer of the budding The intent is to maintain a high level of visual interest relative to the pedestnan expenence as customers walk by the dock area 8) Provide tree planting staggered relative to the street tree planting Hnthrn the planters located adjacent to the bwiding so as to provide a strong tree canopy over the sidewalks on the east, west, and south sides 9) Street tree planting (i e , speaes, size, spaang, location) shall be consistent with the Victona Gardens Master Plan. 10) Provide dense shrub planting (more than 3-foot on center) along the ~~ base of the budding to act as a living" wainscoting since there is only colored stucco proposed for the building base Gay PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 03-75 DRC2003-00237 - ROBINSON'S MAY MAY 14, 2003 Page 4 11) All applicable Conditions of Approval of Tentatve Parcel Map 15716 and Development Agreement DA01-02 shall apply 12) Prowde 10-foot ~nnde (minimum) sidewalks around the bulding wdh tree wells at back of curb consistent with the adopted Vidona Gardens Master Plan Sidewalk shall be natural concrete with a retardant finish or exposed aggregate finish, with saw-cut toints every 5 feet on center 13) The applicant shall make a good faith effort to work with Forest City to design adequate truck fuming radws at on-site intersections and enforce established truck routes for all delivery and trash pick-up activity so as to avoid hawng trucks run over planters or curbs, into walls, etc 14) Coordinate with the mall developer to provide decorative enhanced paving leading from entry doors across the pnvate streets to the parking lots • 15) Provide landscaping on the north and south ends of the utddyenGosure on the east side of the building to screen the enclosure Ground cover, shrubs, and Gimbing vines are suggested vnthin the landscaping Engineenna Diwsion • 1) All applicable Conditions of Approval of Tentative Parcel Map 15716 and Development Agreement DA01-02 shall apply 2) Acknowledgement is given that those improvements to be installed by the Community Fatalities Distnct are satisfied conditions Any improvements or conditions not part of the Community Fatalities Distnct probed must be satisfied by the developer pnor to issuance of any budding permits The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF MAY 2003 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Laity T McNiel, Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary ~~aa PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 03-75 DRC2003-00237 - ROBINSON'S MAY • MAY 14, 2003 I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Plannmg Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Plannmg Commission held on the 14th day of May by the follovwng vote-to-wit AYES C~ Page 5 NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT. COMMISSIONERS. ~~O J •~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DRC2003-00237 SUBJECT: ROBINSONS MAY APPLICANT: MAY DESIGN/CONSTRUCTION LOCATION: VICTORIA GARDENS REGIONAL CENTER ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: ~. General Requirements Completion Date 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, _/~_ its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to reiingwsh such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 03-75, Standard _/_/_ Conditions, and ail environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not requred to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect B. Time Limits 1 DevelopmenUDesign Review approval shall expire if bwlding perrnits are not issued or _/~_ approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which ~_/_ include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and the Victoria Community Plan 2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all ~ / Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner _ _ SC-03-03 1 ~~O y Prgect No DRC2003-00237 Completion Date D. 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Bwldmg Code ~_/_ and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fve Protection District and the Bwldmg and Safety . Dwision to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Rewsed site plans and budding elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/_/_ submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bwldmg permits 5. All site, grading, landscape, irngation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/_/_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, budding, etc) or pnor to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdiwsion, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waroe compliance with all sections of the Development _/_/ Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, Development Agreement No DA01-02, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance 7 A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and ~~_ approved by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of bwldmg permits Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adtacent properties 8. Trash receptacle(s) are regwred and shall meet City standards The final design, locations, ~_/ and the number of trash receptacles shall be subtect to Cary Planner review and approval pnor to the issuance of bwldmg permits 9- All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc , shall ~_/_ be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults . 10 All budding numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and conase manner, _/_/ including proper illumination Shopping Centers 1 A uniform hardscape and street furniture design including seating benches, trash ~_/_ receptacles, free-standing potted plants, bike racks, light bollards, etc ,shall be utilized and be compatible with the architectural style Detailed designs shall be submitted for Planning Division review and approval prior to the issuance of bwldmg permits. 2 Provide for the following design features in each trash enclosure, to the satisfaction of the _/_/_ City Planner a Architecturally integrated into the design of (the shopping center/the protect) _/,~_ b Separate pedestrian access that does not require the opening of the main doors and to _/_/_ include self-closing pedestrian doors c Large enough to accommodate two trash bins _/_/_ d Roll-up doors _/_/_ e Trash bins with counter-weighted lids _/_/_ f Architecturally treated overhead shade trellis _/_/_ g Chain link screen on top to prevent trash from blowing out of the enclosure and _/_/ designed to be hidden from view 3 Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours _/_/_ SC-03-03 2 °` ~ / Project No DRC2003-00237 Completion Date 4 The enure site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours 5 Signs shall be conveniently posted for "no overnight parking" and for "employee parking only " 6 All operations and businesses shall be conducted to comply with the following standards which shall be incorporated into the lease agreements for all tenants a Noise Level -All commercial activities shall not create any noise that would exceed an exterior noise level of 60 dB during the hours of 10 p m until 7 a m and 65 dB during the hours of l a m until 10 p m b Loading and Unloading - No person shall cause the loading, unloading, opening, closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar obtects between the hours of 10 p m and 7 a m unless otherwise specified herein, in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to a residential area Textured pavement shall be provided across circulation aisle, pedestrian walkway, and plaza They shall be of brick/tile pavers, exposed aggregate, integral color concrete, or any combination thereof Full samples shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bulding permits The lighting fixture design shall compliment the architectural program It shall include the plaza area fighting fixtures, budding 6ghUng fixtures (exterior), and parking lot fighting fixtures 9 Any outdoor vending machines shall be recessed into the building faces and shall not extend into the pedestrian walkways The design details shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of bulding permits ~. Building Design All roof appurtenances, including au conditioners and other roof mounted egwpment and/or protections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adlacent properties and streets as regwred by the Planning Division Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner Details shall be included in building plans For commercial and industrial protects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main building colors F. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1 All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long When a side of any parking space abuts a bulding, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide 2 All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall contain a 12-inch walk adlacent to the parking stall (including curb) 3 Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across crculation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/recreational uses 4 All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards 5 Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of building permits For residential development, private gated entrances shall provide adequate turn- around space in front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public right-of-way -/-/- -/-/- ~-/- / / / / ~~- ~-/- ~-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/~- SC-03-03 3 ~ ~l Protect No DRC2003-00237 Completion Date G. H. 6 Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or ~_/_ more parking stalls Designate two percent or one stall, whichever is greater, of the total number of stalls for use by the handicapped 7 Motorcycle parking area shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more ~_/_ parking stalls Developments with over 100 parking stalls shall provide motorcycle parking at the rate of one percent The area for motorcycle parking shall be a minimum of 56 square feet Trip Reduction 1 Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commercial, office, industrial, and multifamily ~~_ residential projects of more than 10 units Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the required automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater After the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces required are 2 5 percent of the regwred automobile parking spaces Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2 5 percent of the regwred automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike rack In no case shall the total number of bicycle parkmg spaces required exceed 100 Where this results in a fraction of 0 5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole number 2 Carpool and vanpoDl designated off-street parkmg close to the bwlding shall be provided for ~~_ commercial, office, and industrial facilities at the rate of 10 percent of the total parking area If covered, the vertical clearance shall be no less than 9 feet 3 Transit improvements such as bus shelters, bus pullouts, and bus pads shall be provided _/~_ Bus shelters shall also include an adjoining bike rack (minimum 3 capacity) on a concrete pad Bus shelter shall be located outside public right-of-way and shall be privately maintained • Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and vrigation plan, including slope planting and model home _//_ landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 Wdhin parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three ~_/_ parking stalls 3 Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of _/_/ one tree per 30 linear feet of budding 4 For multifamily residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible _/~_ for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and tramming Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage 5 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be _/~_ included in the regwred landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscapmg plan which may be regwred by the Engineering Division 6 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, _/~_ the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division 7 Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for City Planner review and _/_/~ approval prior to issuance of bwlding permits These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species SC-03-03 4 ~~~ Protect No DRC2003-00237 Completion Date 6 Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of . Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19 16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code I. Signs 1 The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall regwre separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any signs J. Other Agencies 1 The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) K. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following • 2 3 4 5 6 SC-03-03 a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, i Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Division Project Number (i e , TT #, CUP #, DR #, etc) clearly identified on the outside of ali plans Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the Building and Safety Division Developers wishing to participate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) can i contact the Bulding and Safety Division staff for information and submittal requirements 5 G, 2~ -/~. -/-/- J-/_ ~~. ~~- -/-/- -/-/- /~- -/-/- Prgect No DRC2003-00237 Completion Date L. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be ___/~_ marked with the prolect file number (i e , DRC2003.00237) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Bwldmg and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development prolect _/_/_ or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Bwldmg and Safety Division prior to permits issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tracUparcel map _/_/_ recordation and prior to issuance of bulding permits M. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the California Budding Code (CBC) for property line clearances ___/~_ considering use, area, and fve-resistiveness. 2 Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind° instructions ~~_ 3 Plans for food preparation areas shall be approved by County of San Bernardino _/~_ Environmental Health Services prior to issuance of budding permits 4 Provide smoke and heat venting in accordance with CBC Section 906 _/_/_ 5 Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional regwrements may be needed _/~~ N. Grading 1 Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Bwldmg Code, City _/~_ Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to _/_/_ perform such work 3 The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, _/_/_ submitted, and approved by the Bwldmg and Safety Official prior to the issuance of bwlding permits APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: O. Security Lighting 1 All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power _/_/_ These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell 2 All bwldings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings, _/_/_ with direct lighting to be provided by all entryways Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development 3 Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures _/_/ SC-03-03 6 ~ CJ Protect No DRC2003-00237 Completion Date •P. Security Hardware 1 One-inch single c wtthm 40 inches o used 2 All garage or rollm 3 Ail roof openings gates, or alarmed Q. Windows ylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors If windows are f any locktng dewce, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be g doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices grvtng access to the building shall be secured with either von bars, metal 1 Storefront windows shall be visible to passing pedestrians and traffic 2 Security glazing is recommended on storefront windows to resist window smashes and impede entry to burglars 3 Security/burglar bars are not recommended, particularly in residences, due to the delay or prevention of a speedy evacuation m case of fve R. Building Numbering 1 Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflectroe for rnghmme wsibdiry 2 Developer shall paint roof top numbers on one or more roofs of this development They shall be a minimum of three feet m length and two feet in width and of contrasting color to background The stencils for this purpose are on loan at the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department S. Alarm Systems 1 Install a burglar alarm system and a panic alarm tf needed Instructing management and employees on the operation of the alarm system will reduce the amount of false alarms and m turn save dollars and lives 2 Alarm companies shall be provided with the 24-hour Sheriff's dispatch number (909)941-1488 APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED -/-/- -/-/- -/~- ~-/_ -/~J_ -/___/_ ~~- -/-/- ~-/- -/.~- SC-03-03 7 l7\ 30 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT FIRE SAFETY DIVISION STANDARD CONDITIONS FD PLAN REVIEW#: DRC2003-00237 PROJECT #: PROJECT NAME: DATE: PLAN TYPE: APPLICANT NAME: OCCUPANCY CLASS: DRC2003-00237 Robinson -May ADril 14. 2003 Technical Review FLOOR AREA (S): 180,000 square feet TYPE CONSTRUCTION: Type III FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM REQUIRED Sprinklers, Alarm LOCATION: Victoria Gardens Regional Center FD REVIEW BY: Tlm Feleran, Fire Inspector PLANNER: FIRE DISTRICT USE ONLY Outstanding Fire District Issues Status - "Cleared° when requred information is entered below: Protect Complete ALL OF THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2770, TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WTI'H THE FOLLOWING. RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT- STANDARD CONDITIONS & REQUIREMENTS - General, Procedural, Technical, or Operational Information that shall be Included, Corrected, or Completed as noted below. The following is applicable to the above project. FSC-1 General Reqwrements for Public and Private Water Supply 1 General Guidance for Fire Hydrants: The following provides general guidance for the spacing and location of fire hydrants Remember these are the maximum permitted distances between fire hydrants a Installed as pert of the master plan for this protect Contact the Fire Safe Division 909 477-2770 2 Minimum Fire Flow with Automatic Fire Sprinklers: The required minimum fire flow for this protect is 4000 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch This flow reflects a 50 percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire sprinkler system with central station monitoring This regwrement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as amended, and Fire District Ordinances and Standards ~~ FSC-3 Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems- Technical Comments 1 Required installations: Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance 15 or other adopted code or standard, regwres an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in any of the following a Commercial or industrial structures greater than 7,500 square feet FSC-4 Fire District Site Access- Technical Comments 1 Access Roadways Defined: Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets, and highways, as well as private roads, streets, drive aisles and designated fire lanes Part of protect master plan 2 Fire Lane Identification: All regwred fire lanes shall be identified by red curbing and signage A drawing of the proposed signage that meets the minimum Fire Distract standards shall be submitted to and approved Contact the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District at (909) 477-2770 for a copy of the FD Fire Lanes standard FSGS Fire Alarm System 1 Required Installation: An automatic fve alarm (and detection) system is regwred by RCFPD Ordinance 15, based on use or floor area, or by another adopted code or standard Refer to Ordinance 15 and/or the Calrforma Fire Code for specrfic requrements FSC-10 Hazard Control Permits- Technical Comments The below indicated permit requirements are based on those permits commonly associated with the protects operations or building construction As noted below Speaal Permits may be required, dependent upon approved use(s) the applicant must contact the Fire Safety Division for specific information Note Carefully review the items below. There may be significant impact on the proposed protect. Italicized text indicates a Rancho Cucamonga Fire District amendment. 1 General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which m the judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property 2 Operate a place of public assembly 3 High piled combustible storage FSC-12 Plan Submittal Required Notice Regwred plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 1997/98 Bwlding, Fire, Mechanical, and Plumbing Codes, 1999 Electrical Code, Health and Safety Code, Public Resources Code, and RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD32, Guidelines and Standards NOTE In addition to the fees due at this time please note that separate plan check fees for tenant improvements, fve protection systems and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed at time of submittal of plans FSG14 Alternate Materials and Methods The Fire Safety Division will review requests for alternate materials and methods within the scope of our authority The request must be submitted on the Fve District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents Contact the Fve Safety Division at (909) 477-2770 for assistance ~3a PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS- Complete the following: 1 Prrvate/On-site Fire Hydrants. Prior to the issuance of any bwlding permd, the applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District standards Contac the Fire Safety Division for a copy of "Fire Distract Notes for Underground and Water Plans "Contact the Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770 2. Private Fire Hydrants/On-site Installation. All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable pnor to delivering any combustible bwlding materials on-site (i a ,lumber, roofing materials, etc) A representative of Fire Construction Services shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The builder/developer shall submit final test and inspection report to the Fve Safety Division. Contact Bulding and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 3 Public Fire Hydrants: Prior to issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fve District and the Water District On the plan show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the protect Contact the Fve Safety Division (909) 477-2770 4 Public Installation: All requred public fue hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable pnor to delivering any combustible building materials on-site (i a ,lumber, roofing materials, etc) Water Distract personnel shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The bwlder/developer shall submit a copy of the Water Distract inspection report to the Fire Safety Droision Contact Water Distract to schedule testing PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION- Complete the following: 1 Hydrant Markers: Ail fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers ° On private property these markers are to be maintained in good condition by the property owner Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 ' 1 Private Fire Hydrants- Final Acceptance: For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional test of the on-site fire hydrants shall be conducted by the builder/developer in the presence of the Water Distract or Fire Construction Services, as appropriate The bwlder/developer shall submit the final test report to the Fire Safety Diwsion 2 Fire Sprinkler System- Plans and Permit: Plans for the required automatic fire sprinkler system shall be submitted to Fve Construction Services for review and approval No work is allowed without a Fire Construction Services permit Contact Bwlding and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 3 Fire Sprinkler System- Final Inspection: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services Contact Bwlding and Safety/Fue Construction Services (909) 477-2713 4 Sprinkler Monitoring The fire sprinkler system monitoring system shall be installed, tested, and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system Monitoring is regwred with 20 sprinklers in Group I Occupances, or 100 or more sprinklers in all other Occupancies Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 5 Fire Alarm System: Plans for the fire alarm system shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for review and approval No work is allowed without a Fire District permit Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 6 Knox Rapid Entry System: A Knox rapid entry key vault shall be installed prior to final inspection Proof of purchase shall be submitted prior to final bwlding plan approval Contact the Fire Safety Division for specrfic details and ordering infonnation Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 for inspection 7 Frre Lanes. Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire lanes shall be installed in accordance with the approved fire lane plan The CC&R's or other approved documents shall contain an approved fire lane map and provisions that prohibit parking in the fire lanes The method of enforcement shall be documented The CC&R's shall also identify who is responsible for not less than annual rns action and maintenance of all re cared fire lanes Contact Buildin and Safe /Fire Construction ~...~ ~~ ~J J J ~~ Services (909) 477-2713 8 Address- Other Than Single-family. New buildings other than single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness When the bwlding setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street an additional non-illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance Contact Bwlding and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 9 Fire Alarm System- Final Inspection and Testing: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm (and detection) system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fve Construction Services Contact Bwlding and Safety/Fve Construction Services (909) 477-2713 10 Fire Distract Confidential Business Occupancy Information: The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fue District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" Form and submit to the Fire Safety Division This form provides contact information for Fire Distract use m the event of an emergency at the subject budding or property Contact Fire Safety Divlslon (909) 477-2770 Items or Issues Not Identified Elsewhere 1 Fire Dlstrlct Forms and Letters Note: If these conditions are part of the final Standard Condrt~ons issued by the Planning Division referenced Fire Distract forms and letters are not included Contact the Fire Safety Division for copies of }orms or letters. The }orms and letter are also found in previously issued Fire Distract comments. Fire Distract Rewew Letter (P&E)- Template SL 10/31/02 Revision C-~'3y FSC-3 Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems- Technical Comments 1 Required Installations: Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance 15 or other adopted code or standard, regwres an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in any of the following a Commercial or industrial structures greater than 7,500 square feet FSC-4 Fire District Site Access- Technical Comments 1 Access Roadways Defined Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets, and highways, as well as prroate roads, streets, drive aisles and designated fire lanes Part of protect master plan 2 Fire Lane Identification: All regwred fire lanes shall be identified by red curbing and signage A drawing of the proposed signage that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be submitted to and approved Contact the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District at (909) 477-2770 for a copy of the FD Fire Lanes standard FSC-8 Fire Alarm System 1 Required Installation. An automatic fire alarm (and detection) system is regwred by RCFPD Ordinance 15, based on use or floor area, or by another adopted code or standard Refer to Ordinance 15 and/or the California Fire Code for specific requrements FSC-10 Hazard Control Permits- Technical Comments The below indicated permit requirements are based on those permits commonly associated with the protects operations or building construction As noted below Special Permits may be regwred, dependent upon approved use(s) the applicant must contact the Fire Safety Division for specific information Note: Carefully review the items below. There may be significant impact on the proposed project. Italicized text indicates a Rancho Cucamonga Fire District amendment. 1 General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the tudgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property 2 Operate a place of public assembly 3 High piled combustible storage FSC-12 Plan Submittal Required Notice ILON~O I Requred plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with fi99y~99 Bwlding, Fire, Mechanical, and Plumbing Codes, 1999 Electrical Code, Health and Safety Code, Public Resources Code, and RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD92'Guidelines and Standards NOTE In addition to the fees due at this time please note that separate plan check fees for tenant improvements, fire protection systems and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed at time of submittal of plans FSC-14 Alternate Materials and Methods The Fire Safety Division will review requests for alternate materials and methods within the scope of our authority The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents Contact the Fire Safety Division at (909) 477-2770 for assistance C.~' .~ FSC-15 Public Safety Communications. No person shall construct or develop any commeraal or industrial building or structure or any part thereof or cause the same to be done which fails to support adequate radio coverage for City emergency workers, including, but not limited to firefighters and police (RCFPD Ord 39, Appendix 1-A Section 9 1) This building shall be constructed with 2 inch raceways in the walls which can accommodate any cable necessary to meet this requirement Such raceways shall include an opening in the roof which allows for placement of an exterior antenna and access to each floor Contact Fire Construction Services at (909) 477-2713 for radio coverage standards, testing procedures and approved mitigation measures PRIOR TO ISSUA OF IL G PERMITS- Complete the following: 1 PrivatelOn-site Fire Hydrants: Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District standards Contac the Fire Safety Division for a copy of "Fire District Notes for Underground and Water Plans "Contact the Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770 2. Private Fire Hydrants/On-site Installation• All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable poor to delivering any combustible building materials on-site (i a ,lumber, roofing materials, etc) A representative of Fire Construction Services shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The bwlder/developer shall submit final test and inspection report to the Fire Safety Division Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 3 Public Fire Hydrants Prior to issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire Distract and the Water District On the plan show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the protect Contact the Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770 4 Public Installation: All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable prior to delivering any combustible bwlding materials on-site (i a ,lumber, roofing materials, etc) Water District personnel shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The bwlder/developer shall submit a copy of the Water District inspection report to the Fire Safety Division Contact Water District to schedule testing PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION- Complete the following: 1 Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installahon of Reflective Hydrant Markers " On private property these markers are to be maintained m good condition by the property owner Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 1 Private Frre Hydrants- Final Acceptance• For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional test of the on-site fire hydrants shall be conducted by the builder/developer in the presence of the Water District or Fire Construction Services, as appropriate The builder/developer shall submit the final test report to the Fire Safety Division 2 Fire Sprinkler System- Plans and Permit. Plans for the requred automatic fire sprinkler system shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for review and approval No work is allowed without a Fire Construction Services permit Contact Bwlding and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 3 Frre Sprinkler System- Final Inspection Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services Contact Building and SafetylF~re Construction Services (909) 477-2713 4 Sprinkler Monitoring The fire sprinkler system monitoring system shall be installed, tested, and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system Monitoring is required with 20 sprinklers in Group I Occupances, or 100 or more sprinklers in all other Occupancies Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 5 Fire Alarm S stem: Plans for the fire alarms lain shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for G .~ 3