Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout07-160 - Resolutions RESOLUTION NO. 07-160 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 07-040, REVISING CITY-WIDE TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT FEES FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF RECITALS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Ordinance No. 445 in March, 1991 creating and establishing the authority for imposing and charging city-wide transportation development fees; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has heretofore adopted Resolution No. 07-040, establishing city-wide transportation fees as authorized by Ordinance No. 445; and WHEREAS, the Engineering Division is responsible for reviewing the continued need for the described capital improvements, and revising the cost estimates and fees when appropriate; and WHEREAS, on June 20, 2007, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing concerning the fee revision adopted herein, and WHEREAS, the revised cost estimates and fee calculations applicable to the fee revision herein were available for public inspection and review fourteen (14) days prior to this public hearing, and WHEREAS, it is a requirement of the Development Mitigation Program approved by the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Agency (CMA) that project costs and fees, including transportation development fees, be updated annually; and WHEREAS, the San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG), in its role as the Congestion Management Agency (CMA) for San Bernardino County, has reasonably determined a Cost Escalation Factor for certain development fees including transportation development fees, in the amount of 12.7%, per the Caltrans Construction Items Index, as appropriate for the calendar year 2005-2006. All studies and calculations utilized by SANBAG in making said determination are hereby incorporated by reference herein, and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find as follows: (a) The purpose of the fee revision herein is to finance transportation improvements needed to mitigate the impacts of traffic generated by new development; and Resolution No. 07-160 Page 2 of 10 (b) The fees collected pursuant to this Resolution shall be used to finance only the public facilities described or identified in Exhibit "A" to Resolution No. 07- 040 (referred to as "Exhibit 'A"' herein), which is hereby incorporated by reference herein; and (c) The construction of the described or identified public facilities is consistent with the Circulation Element of the City's General Plan; and (d) There is a reasonable relationship between the need for the described public facilities, and the mitigation of traffic impacts associated with new development; and (e) The cost estimates set forth in Exhibit "A" are reasonable cost estimates for constructing these facilities, and the transportation development fees reasonably calculated to be generated by new development will not exceed the total of these costs; and (f) There is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the revised fee and the type of development for which the fee is charged; and WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. RESOLUTION NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find and resolve as follows: 1. The facts set forth in the Recitals, above, are true and correct. 2. Payment of fee. The revised Transportation Development Fee shall be paid upon issuance of any building permit. The City Engineer shall determine the amount of the fee based upon the size and type of development. 3. Revised Transportation Development Fee. Section 3 of Resolution No. 07-040 is hereby amended by increasing the Transportation Development Fee set forth in said section, by the amount of the SANBAG approved Cost Escalation Factor of 12.7%, from $4,130 per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (as defined in Resolution No. 07-040) to $4,654 per Equivalent Dwelling Unit. 4. Use of Fee. The revised Transportation Development Fee shall be solely used to pay for the public facilities described in Exhibit "A", or for reimbursing the City for developments' fair share of those capital improvements already constructed by the City, or to reimburse other developers who have constructed public facilities described in Exhibit "A". Resolution No. 07-160 Page 3 of 10 S. Fee Review. The Engineering Division shall review the estimated cost of the described capital improvements, the continued need for these improvements, and the reasonable relationship between such need and the traffic impacts of the various types of development pending or anticipated and for which this revised fee is charged. The City Engineer shall report the findings to the City Council at a noticed public hearing, and recommend any adjustment to this fee or other action as may be needed. 6. Except as revised herein, all provisions of Resolution No. 07-040 including, but not limited to, provisions relating to fees, fee calculations and studies, definitions and provisions, shall remain in full force and effect. Exhibits "B" and "C" to Resolution No. 07-040 are hereby amended consistent with the fee revisions herein. 7. This Resolution shall take effect sixty (60) days following passage by the City Council. B. Any judicial action proceeding to attack, review, set aside, void or annul this Resolution shall be brought within 120 days of its adoption. 9. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. Please see the following page for formal adoption,certification and signatures Resolution No. 07-160 Page 4 of 10 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 20th day of June 2007. AYES: Gutierrez, Michael, Spagnolo, Williams NOES: None ABSENT: Kurth ABSTAINED: None Q�u Le/��✓ Diane Williams, Mayor Pro Tem ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a Regular Meeting of said City Council held on the 201h day of June 2007. Executed this 21s' day of June 2007, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adam , CMC, City Clerk Resolution No. 07-160 Page 5 of 10 EXHIBIT "A" CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TRANSPORTATION FEE PROGRAM PROJECTS AND PROJECT COSTS March 21, 2005 . Freewav Interchanges: Base Line Road at I-15 Freeway, widen NB and SB on-ramps = $200,000 (Total project cost = $950,000, Caltrans funds =$750,000.) Foothill Boulevard at I-15 Freeway, widen NB and SB on-ramps = $650,000 (Total project cost= $1.4 million, Caltrans funds = $750,000.) West Half of Base Line Road at I-15 Freeway Interchange = $10,560,000 (Assuming the east half is built by the City of Fontana) (Total construction cost = $16 million. ROW purchased by City RDA. 100% City of RC, New Development fair share percentage= 66%) Arrow Route at I-15 Freeway Interchange = . $15.080:000 (Total construction cost= $29 million,ROW purchased by City RDA. New Development fair share percentage= 52%) Total = $26,490,000 Railroad Grade Separations and Crossings: Haven Avenue at Metrolink Crossing $1.782.000 (Total Project Cost= $15,910,000,New Dev. Fair Share = 11%) 6`h Street, improve RXR crossing gates, west of Lucas Ranch= $300,000 6`h Street, install new RXR crossing gates, east of Santa Anita= $300.000 Hellman Ave, upgrade existing RXR crossing gates at g`h = $300.000 Total = $2.682.000 Bridges: 6`h at Cucamonga Creek Channel (50%RC, 50% Ontario)_ $250;000 91h at Cucamonga Creek Channel (widen) _ $250,000 Arrow Route at Etiwanda Ditch (widen existing bridge) _ $500,000 Banyan Street at Etiwanda Creek Channel (new) = $1,000;000 Hellman at Cucamonga Creek Channel (50% RC, 50% Ontario) _ $500,000 Resolution No. 07-160 Page 6 of 10 Whitman Avenue at Etiwanda Ditch (new) _ $500,000 Wilson Avenue at Day Creek Channel (new) _ $1,000,000 Wilson Avenue at Etiwanda Creek Channel (new)_ $2.000.000 Total = $6,000,000 Streets: 6`h Street, Santa Anita to Etiwanda (backbone only) _ 2,900 if $387,000 Arrow Route, Grove to Baker, widen 2 to 4 lanes = 1,800 1f $877,000 Arrow Route, widen south side 500 ft east of I-15 to 1,300 ft east=.806 if $687,000 Banyan, Etiwanda to East, north side only = 1,5001f $569,000 Banvan Street, East Ave to Wardman/Bulloch (new alignment) = 4,500 If $5,278,000 Base.Line Road, Etiwanda to I-15 Fwy, north side 2 to 3 lanes, = 4001f $331,000 Cherry Avenue, west side only, Wilson to 1-15 Fwy. = 2,600 If $561,000 Church Street, Archibald to Haven, widen 2 to 4 lanes = 2,500 If $1,020,000 East Ave, I-15 to Victoria,various bottlenecks = 600 If $355,000 East Ave.Fire Station to Wilson, (new) = 1,300 If $797.000 East Ave, Wilson Avenue to North Rim Way (new) 500 if $139.000 Etiwanda Ave., 6th to Arrow Route, widen 2 to 4 lanes, = 3,000 If $2.864,000 Etiwanda Ave. Miller to 850 ft north of Miller, widen east side = 850 if $205,000 Etiwanda Ave, Banyan to Wilson, curb and gutter east side only= 2.500 1f $949,000 Etiwanda Ave. existing northern terminus to North Rim Way(new) 500 if $189,000 Foothill Blvd, Vineyard to Hellman, widen 4 to 6 lanes = NA $200,000 Foothill Blvd.. Hellman to 700 ft east (north side only) = 2,7001f $225,000 Footh ll Blvd at Archibald, widen intersection = LS $4.371,000 Foothill Blvd., Archibald to Hermosa (4 to 6 lanes) = NA $1,266,000 Resolution No. 07-160 Page 7 of 10 Grove Avenue; 8`h to Tapia Via, widen east side 1 to 2 lanes = 2,000 if $644,000 Grove Avenue, SanBern to Foothill, widen east side 1 to 2 lanes = 470 If $404,000 Haven Avenue. Base Line to I-210 F Ay, west side only = 500 if $6,000,000 Crest Road (collector), Day Creek to East (new) 5,200 If $878,000 Miller Avenue, Etiwanda to East, widen 2 to 4 lanes = 2,700 If $1.323,000 Milliken Ave, 5'" St to 700 ft south of 5`h'west side only= 700 If $194,000 Victoria St, east PL of EHS to I-15 Fwy, improve both shoulders =400 If $195.000 Vintage Drive, Etiwanda.Avenue to 1300 ft west (new) = 1,300 if $256.000 Wilson Avenue, Milliken to Day Creek Blvd, new. = 6,500 If $4.000,000 Wilson Avenue, Etiwanda Ave to East Avenue, (backbone only= 2,700 If $311,000 Wilson Avenue, East Avenue to WardmanBulloch, new 4,000 If $3,155,000 Young's Canyon, Cherry Ave. to WardmanBulloch, new= 6,300 if $8.162.000 Total = $46,792,000 Summary: Freeway Interchanges = $26,490,000 Railroad Crossings = $21682,000 Bridges = $6,000,000 Streets = $46,792,000 Traffic signals, (56 each at S140,000) _ $7,840,000 Sienal Interconnect System = S4.517.000 Total = $94,321,000 Funds currently in Transportation Development Fee Account= -$20.000.000 Sub-Total = $74,321,000 Administration Fee (15%) _ $11.148.000 Total = $85,469,000 Resolution No. 07-160 Page 8 of 10 EXHIBIT "B" TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT FEES Updated: June, 2007 Land Use Fee Single Family Dwelling Unit (SFDU $4,654 per unit Multi-family Dwelling Unit (MFDU) $2,792 per unit Apartment $2,792 per unit Senior Housing-Attached (Apartments or Condos) $930 per bedroom Congregate Care Facility $930 per bed Commercial Shopping Center $6,976 per 1000 sf Industrial Park $2,792 per 1000 sf Warehouse $2,327 per 1000 sf Office/Business Park $5,585 per 1000 sf Hotel/Motel $3,722 per room Self Storage $92 per storage unit Day Care $1,163 per student Convenience Store with Gas Pumps $23,271 per gas pump Resolution No. 07-160 Page 9 of 10 EXHIBIT "C" San Bernardino Associated Governments i SANBAG 1170 W. 3rtl Street, San Bernardino, CA 92410 i - Phone: (909) 884-8276 Fax: (909)885-4407 " ��' '� Web: www.sanbao.ca.aov -San Bernardino County Transportation Commission -San Bernardino County Transportation Authority - *San Bernardino County Congestion Management Agency .Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies DATE: April 9, 2007 TO: City Managers FROM: Ty Schuiling, SANBAG Director of Planning and Programming SUBJECT: Development Mitigation Nexus Study Update The SANBAG Development Mitigation Nexus Study was approved in October, 2005 as the basis for local jurisdictions in the Valley and Victor Valley to establish development impact fee (DIF) or similar development mitigation programs for regional transportation improvements. The Nexus Study is to be updated every two years, coordinated with the biennial update of the Congestion Management Program. The current version of the SANBAG Development Mitigation Nexus Study (Nexus Study) and Appendix J of the Congestion Management Program are attached for your review and comment. The technical review and comment period on the Nexus Study and implementation language begins now and will extend through May 31, 2007. The report will then be revised, re- circulated, and reviewed at the policy level; with SANBAG Board approval anticipated to occur in conjunction with the 2007 Congestion Management Program (CMP) update, no later than November 2007. The version of the Nexus Study attached to the memo includes all amendments that were approved by the SANBAG Board of Directors from July 2006 to January 2007. Appendix J includes the revisions to the implementation language proposed by SANBAG at the January 2007 Comprehensive Transportation Plan Technical Advisory Committee (CTP TAC) meeting. During the Nexus Study comment period we are requesting the following from local jurisdictions: 1. Provide revised arterial project costs. Please mark up the Arterial Project List (Attachment 1 of the Nexus Study, included in this packet), showing estimated project costs for each arterial project as of the end of calendar year 2006. The Arterial Project List shows project costs as of the end of 2005, including the cost escalation based on the Board-approved factor of 12.9%between 2004 and 2005. At the March 2007 SANBAG Board of Directors Meeting, the Board approved the 2006 cost escalation factor to be applied to the Nexus Study. The escalation factor is 12.7% and this factor will be applied to all arterial; interchange and railroad grade separation projects if alternate cost information is not provided by your stat£ The Arterial Project List does not include the 2005-2006 12.7% cost escalation. Jurisdictions may update project costs directly to 2006 using new engineering cost estimates or may direct SANBAG to simply apply the 12.7% escalation factor to the Arterial Project List. Local jurisdictions may use a recent Project TrommittalOfNex StudvRepor106-06-13.doc Cities of..Adelanto,Barstow, Big Bear Lake, Chino, Chino Hills, Colton,Fontana,Grand Terrace,Hesperia,Highland,Loma Linda,Montclair Needles, Ontario,Rancho Cucamonga,Redlands,Rialto,San Bernardino, Twemynine Palms, Upland, Victorville, Fucatpa Towns of:Apple Dalley, Yucca Valley County of San Bernardino Resolution No. 07-160 Page 10 of 10 Study Report (PSR), new engineering estimate or some other planning-level estimate that is able to be substantiated as the basis for revising project costs. If a jurisdiction chooses to revise project costs in a manner other than use of the 12.7% escalation factor, SANBAG staff will review the cost escalation materials provided by local jurisdictions. 2. Provide revised interchange project costs. Please mark up the attached Table 1 with revised interchange project costs on those interchanges for which your jurisdiction anticipates being the lead agency (usually the jurisdiction in which most of the interchange is physically located). The costs are currently shown in 2005 dollars. Costs should be updated to 2006. In addition,the costs should be broken down by four phases: 1) Project Approval/Environmental Documentation; 2) Final design; 3) Right-of-way; and 4) Construction. Please reference the source of the cost information as well. If insufficient information exists to break the costs down into the four categories, please note that on the table and provide the updated total cost. Feel free to contact SANBAG if you are unable to provide updated cost information for any of the interchanges. An electronic version of Table 1 is being provided to your staff. 3. Provide local DIF program update timeline. During discussions on the Nexus Study update that occurred with the CTP TAC, local jurisdiction staff expressed the desire for flexibility in the timeline for updating local DIF programs in response to updates of the SANBAG Nexus Study. Consequently, it was agreed that local jurisdictions may choose allowed to update the regional transportation portion of their DIF programs at either the beginning of the fiscal year or the beginning of the calendar year. At this time, SANBAG requests that your jurisdiction select its preferred time for DIF program updates. This information will be compiled into a new table and included into the 2007 Nexus Study Update. Please use the attached form to specify the update schedule. 4. Provide comments on the text of the Nexus Study and on Appendix J of the CMP. Please review the text of the Nexus Study and the text of Appendix J and provide suggested edits,modifications, or additions as appropriate. SANBAG's proposed changes to the text of Appendix J are highlighted. SANBAG will circulate the electronic version of Appendix J to your staff to facilitate editing,and a marked up electronic version may be returned to us via e-mail. SANBAG staff is available to meet with representatives from your jurisdiction or to answer any questions you may have. Please direct your written comments and questions to Ryan Graham, Transportation Planning Specialist, at(909) 884-8276 or e-mail rgraham@sanbag.ca.gov. We appreciate your assistance and look forward to your comments.